# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 249.2 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 250.24 {I7} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 192.2 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 190.8 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 8.4 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 5 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 325.8 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 326.32 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 100 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 269.8 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 270.16 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 100 {I9} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g)), 100 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 438.2 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 439.2 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 17.5 {I8} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 18 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 248.0 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 248.9 {I2} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 490.6 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 491.14 {I15} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 659.8 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 660.6 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 353.1 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 353.53 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 103.7 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 103.50 {I8} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 653.6 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 654.3 {I2} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 644.6 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 645.4 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 763.2 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 764.3 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 98 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 50 {I10} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 894.0 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 895.2 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 100 {I17} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 738.1 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 739.0 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 8.9 {I6} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 4.4 {I12} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g)), 11 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 841.4 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 842.7 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 100 {I9} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g)), 100 {I11} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 867.3 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 868.4 {I6} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 311.1 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 312.2 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 56.9 {I21} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 47 {I6} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g)), 35 {I6} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1049.4 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 1050.9 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 100 {I12} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g)), 100 {I17} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 995.8 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 996.9 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1036.4 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 1038.4 {I7} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1131.4 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 1133.0 {I8} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1126.0 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 1127.5 {I8} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1256.2 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 1252 {I1} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M,CC$1982Ga06 report |a=0.9 to 2.5 based on intensity balance arguments. 1980DaZO report |a=0.93 {i9}, probably also from intensity balance arguments, but no details are given. These results allow mult=M2 (|a=1.17) or mult=E2 (|a=0.85). If E2, then B(E2)(W.u.)=1.5|*10{+-7}, a value about three orders smaller than other reduced E2 transition probabilities in this mass region (1979En04). If M2, then |b(M2)(W.u.)=7.4|*10{+-6}. A possibly similar, highly retarded M2 transition has been seen in {+76}Br decay (see 1982Ga06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$E|g=178.0 3 (|e decay), 177.8 3 (in-beam |g) 
$I|g=100.0 6 (|e decay), 100 4 (in-beam |g) 
M,MR$from |a{-K}(exp) and |g(|q) (|DJ=1) in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$E|g=213.3 4 (|e decay), 213.6 2 (in-beam |g) 
$I|g=88 10 (|e decay), 93 7 (in-beam |g) 
M$there could be a M1 component based on |a{-K}(exp) in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=45.6 1 (|e decay), 45.6 3 (in-beam |g) 
$I|g=100 22 (|e decay), 100 32 (in-beam |g) 
M$dipole from |a(K)exp in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g); M1 excluded by |D|p determined from other evidence 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 89 {I7} in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g) 
$E|g=259.0 4 (|e decay), 259.2 2 (in-beam |g) 
M$evaluators treat multipolarity assignment from in-beam |g-ray data as tentative, due to sharp disagreement in |g-branching ratio for this |g ray in |e decay and in-beam |g-ray study. |DJ=0 from |g(|q) in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$E|g=454.3 5 (|e decay), 454.5 2 (in-beam |g) 
$I|g not given in in-beam |g 
M$|DJ=0 from |g(DCO) in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$E|g=503.0 4 (|e decay), 503.1 2 (in-beam |g) 
$I|g=100 51 (|e decay), 100 14 (in-beam |g) 
M$Q from |g(|q) in ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=654.2 5 (|e decay), 654.4 2 (in-beam |g) 
RI$from ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g), where the level is strongly populated. Other: I|g=13 {I3} in |e decay seems discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|g-ray branching ratio is low by a factor of |?3 as compared to that in Adopted Gammas, value taken from ({+40}Ca,|a3p|g), where 681 level is strongly populated. 
$I|g(503)/I|g(654)=89 {I6}/11 {I6} (1999Mi17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. Other: 26.8 from K-conversion peak observed at 13.3; with I(ce)/I(ceK)(188|g)=0.42 {I13} (1990He08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$too high by a factor of |?4, as compared to that in Adopted Gammas, where the value is from {+73}Kr |e decay 
$|DJ=0 (1987He27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.18 {I14}, R{|q}=2.25 {I5}, |D{-asym}=0.10 {I7} 
MR$weighted average of +0.62 {I+13-17} from |g(|q) and +0.42 {I+8-15} from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol). 2022Bh04 give +0.52 {I+15-23} 
$Monopole transition strength |r{+2}(E0)=0.073 spu {I6} (2022Bh04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) (1991Ho01). |d=0.25 (1991Ho01) is too high since it gives B(E2)(W.u.)=1140 {I130}. |d<0.14 from RUL(E2)=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) (1991Ho01). |d=0.25 (1991Ho01) is too high since it gives B(E2)(W.u.)=760 {I140}. |d<0.18 from RUL(E2)=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) (1991Ho01). |d=0.12 (1991Ho01) is too high since it gives B(E2)(W.u.)=1780 {I240}. |d<0.05 from RUL(E2)=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) (1991Ho01). |d=0.16 (1991Ho01) is too high since it gives B(E2)(W.u.)=1900 {I400}. |d<0.07 from RUL(E2)=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
This placement suggested by evaluators on the basis of {+74}Kr |e decay. I|g deduced from {+74}Kr |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from (HI,xn|g); unplaced in 1983Wi01 
$A{-2}=-0.01 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} 
$ A2=-0.1 IN (3HE,P2NG) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from (HI,xn|g); unplaced in 1983Wi01 
A{-2}=-0.54 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.3 {I1} 
$A{-2}=-0.6 in ({+3}He,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$18 (1981Ga11) for doublet 
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} 
R(DCO)=0.61 {I11} for 128.2+128.6 |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$38 (1991Ho01), 37 (1981Ga11) 
$A{-2}=-0.56 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} 
R(DCO)=0.42 {I4} 
$ DCO=0.34 7, 0.35 3 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$89 (1991Ho01), 100 (1981Ga11) 
R(DCO)=0.24 {I2} 
$ DCO=0.20 2, 0.22 1 (1991Ho01) 
$ A2=-0.43 2, A4=+0.02 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$13 (1991Ho01), 24 (1981Ga11) 
R(DCO)=0.41 {I4} 
$ DCO=0.36 4, 0.31 4 (1991Ho01) 
$A{-2}=-0.43 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$7.5 (1991Ho01), 5 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=26% {I4} (1999Ga11) 
$ A{-2}=+0.31 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I15} 
R(DCO)=1.03 {I13} 
$ DCO=1.02 19, 1.07 13 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$56 (1991Ho01), 63 (1981Ga11) 
R(DCO)=0.25 {I2} 
$ DCO=0.21 2, 0.26 2 (1991Ho01) 
$A{-2}=-0.52 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$44 (1991Ho01), 25 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=37% {I2} (1999Ga11), 36% {I1} (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=1.08 {I4} 
$ DCO=0.89 8, 0.95 3 (1991Ho01) 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$18 (1981Ga11) 
$ A{-2}=-0.24 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.06 {10}. Note that sign of A{-2} is inconsistent with |DJ=2 
R(DCO)=1.18 {I14} for 283.0+283.8 |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$21 (1991Ho01), 26 (1981Ga11) 
A{-2}=-0.63 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I10} 
R(DCO)=0.29 {I3} 
$ DCO=0.29 2, 0.23 3 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$11 (1991Ho01), 8 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=32% {I2} (1999Ga11), 33% {I1} (1991Ho01) 
$ A{-2}=+0.21 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I1} 
R(DCO)=1.36 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$8.2 (1991Ho01), 11 (1981Ga11) 
R(DCO)=0.53 {I6} 
$ DCO=0.34 5, 0.53 8 (1991Ho01) 
$A{-2}=-0.46 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$39 (1991Ho01), 19 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=71% {I2} (1999Ga11), 82% {I1} (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=1.07 {I4} 
$ DCO=1.07 8, 0.97 7 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$6.3 (1991Ho01), 1 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=57% {I1} (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=1.29 {I10} 
$ DCO=0.97 26, 1.07 14 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$19 (1991Ho01), 14 (1981Ga11) 
R(DCO)=0.36 {I4} 
$ DCO=0.34 2, 0.32 2 (1991Ho01) 
$A{-2}=-0.47 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$22 (1991Ho01), 13 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=93% {I1} (1991Ho01) 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I12} 
R(DCO)=0.94 {I5} 
$ DCO=1.11 21, 0.98 8 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$4.9 (1991Ho01) 
$Branching=61% {I2} (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=0.86 {I10} 
$ DCO=0.93 15, 0.85 13 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$7.0 (1991Ho01), 3 (1981Ga11) 
$Branching=63% {I1} (1991Ho01) 
A{-2}=-0.8 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.4 {I4} 
R(DCO)=0.27 {I4} 
$ DCO=0.32 10, 0.33 3 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$8.0 (1991Ho01), 2 (1981Ga11) 
$I|g(894)/I|g(408)=63 {I1}/37 {I1} (1999Lo17) 
R(DCO)=0.90 {I7} 
$ DCO=0.94 12 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$3.4 (1991Ho01) 
$Branching=78% {I3} (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=0.99 {I8} 
$ DCO=0.98 22, 1.03 8 (1991Ho01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$6.7 (1991Ho01) 
$Branching=79% {I3} (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=1.09 {I6} for 1105.7+1108.6 |g's 
$ DCO=1.09 20, 1.04 9 (1991Ho01) FOR 1105.7+1108.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$11 (1991Ho01) 
R(DCO)=1.09 {I6} for 1105.7+1108.6 |g's 
$ DCO=1.09 20, 1.04 9 (1991Ho01) FOR 1105.7+1108.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
I|g(219)/I|g(153) is from {+75}Kr |e decay. This ratio is not too different in other reactions, but in ({+30}Si,p2n|g) this ratio is >12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.35 {I16} 
E$an 1152.8|g from (23/2+) member was tentatively proposed by 1985Lu02. No 1152.8|g is reported by 1999So10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 119.6 {I3} (1995BeZS), 119.6 {I3} (1974Ho35), 119.5 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=119.6 {I3}, I|g=2.04 {I7} (1974Ho35) 
$ E|g=119.5 {I2}, I|g=1.68 {I14} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$average of 132.5 {I3} (1995BeZS), 132.5 {I2} (1974Ho35), 132.5 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=132.5 {I2}, I|g=70 (1974Ho35) 
$ E|g=132.5 {I2}, I|g=70 {I8} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$average of 22.3 {I3} (1995BeZS), 22.1 {I2} (1974Ho35), 22.2 {I1} (1974Ro12) 
M$E1 or M1 from intensity balance; M1 is required by |DJ|p. 
$ E|g=22.1 {I2}, I|g=1.84 {I11} (1974Ho35) 
$ E|g=22.2 {I1}, I|g=1.96 {I7} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$average of 154.7 {I3} (1995BeZS), 154.5 {I3} (1974Ho35), 154.7 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=154.5 {I3}, I|g=21.8 {I11} (1974Ho35) 
$ E|g=154.7 {I2}, I|g=20 {I3} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$ from spectrum obtained with a high-resolution planar detector (appendix |b{-3}, p111 in 1995BeZS) 
M$M1 or E1 from |a(K)exp. log| {Ift} supports negative parity for J=1/2 for 179.4 level 
$ E|g=179.4 {I2}, I|g=0.27 {I3} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 88.5 {I3} (1995BeZS), 88.4 {I2} (1974Ho35), 88.4 {I1} (1974Ro12) 
M$ E2 or M2 from ce data, but E2 from RUL 
$ E|g=88.4 {I2}, I|g=3.59 {I14} (1974Ho35) from 374 level 
$ E|g=88.4 {I1}, I|g=3.1 {I6} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$average of 273.2 {I3} (1995BeZS), 273.1 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=273.1 {I2}, I|g=0.56 {I7} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$average of 352.5 {I3} (1995BeZS), 352.5 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=352.5 {I2}, I|g=0.77 {I7} (1974Ro12); placed from a 507.2 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$average of 153.3 {I3} (1995BeZS), 153.2 {I3} (1974Ho35), 153.3 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=153.2 {I3}, I|g=8.4 {I5} (1974Ho35) from a 285.7 level 
$ E|g=153.3 {I2}, I|g=5.9 {I8} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$average of 241.7 {I3} (1995BeZS), 241.7 {I2} (1974Ro12) 
$ E|g=241.7 {I2}, I|g=1.26 {I14} (1974Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ from figure 2.15 in 1995BeZS. In Table 3.2 and figure 2.17 it listed as 1249.8. In an email reply of April 5, 2012, Dr. R. Rubio suggested that 1249.0 is a better value 
$ E|g=1249.5 {I5}, I|g=0.45 {I5} (1974Ho35); from a 2042.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$assigned by authors to {+74}Se, but shown by 1985Lu02 and 1989Ma27 to be due, at least in part, to {+75}Br. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in {+76}Br IT decay 
$B(M2)(W.u.): greatest retardation in the systematics of M2 transitions in A=45-90 region (1979En04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(150.5|g)/I|g(104.9|g) disagree in {+76}Kr |e and (p,n|g) it is possible to relocate 150.5|g from 252 level in {+76}Kr |e decay and from 363 level in (p,n|g). The 150|g may be a doublet with only a part of the intensity from this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (HI,xn|g) 
MR$+0.2 to +1.8 from |g(|q,pol); <0.2 from RUL<300 for E2 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<305 upper limit exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (HI,xn|g). Other: 112.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Others: 100 {I10} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 100 {I7} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 100 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
MR$-0.3 to -2.4 from |g(|q,pol); <0.16 from RUL<300 for E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 254.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 254.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 253.9 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 10.1 {I9} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 20.5 {I24} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 13.2 {I10} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 17.0 {I9} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 164.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 165.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I8} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 221.7 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 222.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 34.3 {I24} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 46.6 {I34} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
M$|DJ=0, dipole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighed average of 364.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 364.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 5.0 {I21} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 15.8 {I19} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 238.3 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 238.0 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 237.9 {I2} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Others: 100 {I7} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 100 {I7} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 100 {I6} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (HI,xn|g). Others: 350.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 349.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 20.5 {I18} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 15.9 {I23} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 13.7 {I10} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 11.1 {I28} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 221.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 220.4 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I10} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 330.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 330.6 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 60 {I4} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 21.6 {I25} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 386.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 385.7 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 20 {I4} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), and 49 {I6} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 443.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 442.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 9 {I4} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 19.5 {I21} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (HI,xn|g). Others: 93.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 93.4 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Others: 100 {I8} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 100 {I8} from (HI,xn|g) 
MR$<0.12 for RUL(E2)<300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 331.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 331.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 331.3 {I2} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 86 {I4} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 96 {I8} from (HI,xn|g). Other: 164 {I13} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 301.0 {I4} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 300.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I11} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 521.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 521.0 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 58 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 74 {I11} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g) only 
M$D, |DJ=1 from R(ADO) in ({+12}C,p3n|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.0|*10{+2} {I+13-10} upper bound exceeds RUL=300 
E$from (HI,xn|g). Others: 432.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 431.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Others: 100 {I10} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 100 {I8} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 100 {I7} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 525.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 525.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 526.0 {I2} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 14 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 7.7 {I19} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 9.3 {I14} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 350.4 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 349.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 44 {I7} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 47 {I4} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 650.4 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (HI,xn|g). Others: 390.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 390.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 69.7 {I28} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 32 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 26.3 {I21} from (HI,xn|g) 
MR$-0.16 to -1.3 from |g(|q,pol); <0.6 from RUL<300 for E2 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.8|*10{+2} {I+21-15} upper bound exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 823.3 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 822.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 823.4 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Others: 100 {I7} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) and 100 {I21} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 921.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) and 922.3 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 409.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 409.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 62 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 72 {I7} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 759.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 759.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I9} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)<0.35 from RUL<300 for E2 
E$weighted average of 482.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 481.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 482.1 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Others: 100 {I8} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) and (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 873.7 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 872.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 872.8 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 19.3 {I20} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 41 {I7} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 13 {I4} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 960.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 959.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 959.6 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 471.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 469.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 52 {I7} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 33 {I4} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 880.0 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 879.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I11} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 497.8 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 497.6 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 633.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 634.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 70 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 40 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 1115.4 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I15} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 470.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 471.2 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 39 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 77 {I12} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 941.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 941.0 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,2|an|g). Other: 100 {I15} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 527.9 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 527.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I13} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 62 {I16} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1025.7 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 1025.0 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 100 {I37} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1115.0 {I6} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 1115.0 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 1114.0 {I6} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 536.0 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 536.4 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: |<33 from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 1063.9 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 100 {I27} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1375.4 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 1374.6 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 1374 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1552.6 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g) and 1552.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g). Other: 1550 {I4} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1498.9 {I8} from ({+30}Si,2|an|g), 1496.7 {I5} from ({+12}C,p3n|g), and 1496 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g from 1990Bu07, I|g from 1981We07 
$|g(|q) data disagree with that expected for |DJ=2 (from |DJ|p) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$this |g is reassigned by 1997Wi01 and 1997Pa35 from a 3286 level. Instead a 497.8|g deexcites a 2579 level in 1997Pa35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 45.5 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 45.50 {I15} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 50 {I5} (1973Pa02) and 46.8 {I34} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=17.5 {I8}, Ice(L+M)=2.28 (1973Pa02). Ice(L+M) is deduced from Ice(L+M)(45.5|g)+Ice(K)(57.2|g)=2.55 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 57.2 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 57.0 {I2} (1973Lo07). Placement suggested on the basis of {+76}Br IT decay; placed from 317 to 260 level by 1973Pa02; unplaced in 1973Lo07 
RI$unweighted average of 0.14 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 0.26 {I5} (1973Lo07) 
M$from the Adopted dataset. |a(K)exp in 1973Pa02 is too low to be consistent with mult=M2 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.27, Ice(L+M)(57.2|g)+Ice(K)(63.6|g)=0.078 {I7} (1973Pa02). Ice(K) is deduced from Ice(L+M)(45.5|g)+Ice(K)(57.2|g)=2.55 {I16} 
$|a(L+M)exp from 1958-Carter work cited in Table 2 of 1973Pa02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 104.9 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 105.0 {I3} (1973Lo07) 
RI$other: 0.086 {I26} (1973Lo07, seen only in |g|g-coin) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
E$also from 1973Lo07 
RI$from 0.56 {I10} for the doublet, weighted average of 0.50 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 0.69 {I14} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$also from 1973Lo07; placement suggested by the evaluators 
RI$from 0.56 {I10} for the doublet, weighted average of 0.50 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 0.69 {I14} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 252.0 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 252.2 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 16.2 {I16} (1973Pa02) and 17.2 {I9} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.035 {I3} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 63.6 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 63.8 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.17 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 0.43 {I7} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)(63.6|g)+Ice(L+M)(57.2|g)=0.078 {I7} (1973Pa02) 
$|a(K)exp from 1958-Carter work cited in Table 2 of 1973Pa02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 270.2 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 270.4 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 54 {I6} (1973Pa02) and 52.7 {I34} (1973Lo07) 
M$|a(K)exp and |a(L+M)exp for 270.2|g+271.6|g consistent with E1 for both |g rays in 1973Pa02 
$Absolute Ice(K)(270.2+271.6)=0.105 {I3}, Ice(L+M)(270.2+271.6)=0.011 {I2} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 315.7 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 315.8 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$from 1973Lo07. Other: 100 {I10} (1973Pa02) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.093 {I6}, Ice(L+M)=0.011 {I1} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 166.7 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 166.8 {I3} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.42 {I9} (1973Pa02) and 0.51 {I10} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 214.5 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 214.4 {I4} (1973Lo07). Placement suggested by the evaluators on the basis of (135|g)(214|g)-coin in 1973Lo07; it is placed from 260 to 46 level in 1973Pa02 and unplaced in 1973Lo07 
RI$unweighted average of 0.78 {I8} (1973Pa02) and 0.51 {I6} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 271.6 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 271.8 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 11.5 {I12} (1973Pa02) and 11.7 {I14} (1973Lo07) 
M$|a(K)exp and |a(L+M)exp for 270.2|g+271.6|g consistent with E1 for both |g rays in 1973Pa02. See comment for 270.3|g from 315 level 
$Absolute Ice(K)(270.2+271.6)=0.105 {I3}, Ice(L+M)(270.2+271.6)=0.011 {I2} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 40.0 {I6} (1973Pa02) and 39.4 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.14 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 0.34 {I12} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 103.3 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 103.20 {I15} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 8.5 {I9} (1973Pa02) and 9.8 {I9} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.300 {I10}, Ice(L+M)=0.061 {I8} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 309.8 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 309.9 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 6.6 {I7} (1973Pa02) and 6.2 {I9} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 91.1 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 90.9 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.53 {I11} (1973Pa02) and 2.1 {I4} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.030 {I2} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 295.0 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 294.8 {I3} (1973Lo07). Unplaced in 1973Lo07 
RI$weighted average of =0.50 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 0.51 {I14} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 446.2 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 446.5 {I3} (1973Lo07). Placement from 1973Pa02 
RI$from 1.27 {I27} for the doublet, weighted average of 1.00 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 1.54 {I26} (1973Lo07). See also 446.4 from 898 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 96.6 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 96.7 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.28 {I6} (1973Pa02) and 0.60 {I9} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.015 {I3} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 134.8 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 6.5 {I7} (1973Pa02) and 7.2 {I9} (1973Lo07) 
M$ce data for 134.9|g+136.4|g consistent with M1 for both |g rays (1973Pa02) 
$Absolute Ice(K)(134.9+136.4)=0.180 {I10}, Ice(L+M)(134.9+136.4)=0.026 {I4} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 136.4 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 136.2 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 2.74 {I28} (1973Pa02) and 2.4 {I5} (1973Lo07) 
M$ce data for 134.9|g+136.4|g consistent with M1 for both |g rays (1973Pa02) 
$Absolute Ice(K)(134.9+136.4)=0.180 {I10}, Ice(L+M)(134.9+136.4)=0.026 {I4} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 199.8 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 199.9 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 3.00 {I30} (1973Pa02) and 3.43 {I52} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.030 {I3} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$also from 1973Lo07 
RI$weighted average of 30.7 {I31} (1973Pa02) and 30.0 {I26} (1973Lo07) 
$Absolute Ice(K)=0.018 {I3} (1973Pa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 451.9 {I2} (1973Pa02) and 452.1 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 25.1 {I25} (1973Pa02) and 23.2 {I35} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Lo07. Other: 35.6 {I2} (1973Pa02), placed from 316 level 
RI$unweighted average of 0.22 {I5} (1973Pa02) and 0.69 {I9} (1973Lo07) 
M$possible dipole since total conversion coefficient of 37.5 for E2 may make it difficult to observe this |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 548.5 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 548.1 {I4} (1973Lo07). Placement suggested by evaluators 
RI$weighted average of 0.50 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 0.26 {I9} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Pa02. Other: 299.2 {I2} in 1973Lo07 probably a doublet corresponding to 299.0 and 300.2 in 1973Pa02 
RI$from 1973Pa02. Other: 2.57 {I26} in 1973Lo07 probably for a doublet corresponding to 299.0 and 300.2 in 1973Pa02 
$Absolute Ice(K)(299.0+300.2)=0.012 {I3} (1973Pa02) 
$|a(K)exp for 299.0|g+300.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 499.6 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 499.9 {I3} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 1.20 {I12} (1973Pa02) and 1.12 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 552.5 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 552.8 {I3} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 4.3 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 3.4 {I7} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 822.5 {I6} (1973Pa02) and 822.7 {I5} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.64 {I7} (1973Pa02) and 0.77 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 868.2 {I5} (1973Pa02) and 868.3 {I5} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.64 {I7} (1973Pa02) and 1.03 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 446.2 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 446.5 {I3} (1973Lo07). Placement from 1973Lo07 
RI$from 1.27 {I27} for the doublet, weighted average of 1.00 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 1.54 {I26} (1973Lo07). See also 446.4 from 446 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement suggested by evaluators on the basis of (452|g)(91|g)-coin in 1973Lo07, who place this transition from a 807.5 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 543.2 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 543.6 {I2} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.75 {I8} (1973Pa02) and 0.86 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 581.5 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 581.8 {I4} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 1.31 {I13} (1973Pa02) and 1.03 {I26} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 582.5 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 581.8 {I4} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 2.91 {I29} (1973Pa02) and 2.40 {I34} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 898.5 {I5} (1973Pa02) and 897.9 {I6} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.42 {I9} (1973Pa02) and 0.51 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Lo07. Other: 484.5 {I4} (1973Pa02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.17 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 0.34 {I10} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Lo07. Other: 490.2 {I4} (1973Pa02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.47 {I10} (1973Pa02) and 0.60 {I16} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 684.3 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 684.6 {I3} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.39 {I8} (1973Pa02) and 0.86 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 232.7 {I3} (1973Pa02) and 232.3 {I4} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.140 {I28} (1973Pa02) and 0.34 {I9} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 431.6 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 431.9 {I5} (1973Lo07) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.20 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 0.60 {I14} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 730.8 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 731.5 {I4} (1973Lo07) 
RI$from 1973Pa02. Other: 0.51 {I17} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 795.8 {I4} (1973Pa02) and 796.5 {I5} (1973Lo07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.75 {I8} (1973Pa02) and 1.20 {I34} (1973Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from 1990Wi02. The |g shown in level-scheme figure in 1997Wi01 without E|g value. Level-energy difference is 313.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$in 1997Pa35, only a tentative placement is shown from 3286 level; main placement of 595.8|g is from a 4301 level which is given in Adopted dataset. 
E$ 595.2 (1990Wi02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$-0.27 {I10} or -1.6 {I4} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g). |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) consistent with lower value of |d. RUL=300 for E2 gives |d<1.6 
M$from T{-1/2}(162 level) and RUL for E2 and M2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$ce data in {+77}Kr |e decay give M1,E2. DCO ratio in ({+18}O,|a2n|g) indicates |DJ=1, mainly dipole 
MR$+0.10 {I5} or infinity from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$|d(E2/M1)=-0.8 {I5} from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g); DCO ratio in ({+18}O,|a2n|g) indicates |DJ=1, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$in 1989NaZZ and 1974De51 483.4|g and 483.1|g (from 2021 level) proposed as unresolved doublet. Other studies place it from 1274 level only 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0052 {I14}, B(E2)(W.u.)=29 {I8} for |d=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$other: 11 {I2} in 1973EbZQ 
E$|g not consistently present in all in-beam |g-ray studies, 1989NaZZ suggested contribution from an impurity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1989NaZZ suggest a doublet with E|g=483.4 and 483.1, the other transition placed with 2021 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$comparison with other studies suggests that this line in 1989NaZZ probably belongs mostly to an impurity. Expected I|g=0.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement is from ({+6}Li,3n|g). Placement from a 1788 level in (|a,2n|g) is not confirmed in any other study 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=146.6 {I5}, I|g=39 {I4} (1975Mo20, at E(p)=2.8 MeV) 
$|d=-0.87 {I30} or -5.7 {I37} from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=425.1 {I5}, I|g=6.8 {I20} (1975Mo20, at E(p)=2.8 MeV) 
$|d=+0.58 {I3} or +4.3 {I10} from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=471.1 {I5}, I|g=4.2 {I10} (1975Mo20, at E(p)=2.8 MeV) 
$|d=-0.38 {I20} or -8.1 {I42} from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=5.0 (1967Ho16), |a(L)exp=1.6 {I1} (1974Ho37). K/L=3.0 {I2} (1974Ho37), 4.3 {I3} (1967Ho16), 3.6 (1955Th01) 
M$from K/L and |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Transition detected as conversion electrons 
TI$from intensity balance at 106 level 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from K/(L+M)=1.3 {I10} (1955Th01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Ho22 
M$from ce data. |a(K)exp=0.033 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0053 {I8} (1974Ho37, 1967Ho16, 1955Th01). K/L=6.2 {I10} (1974Ho37), 10 {I2} (1967Ho16), 8.3 (1955Th01) 
MR$from ce data |d<0.07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Ho22 
M,MR$from ce data. |a(K)exp=0.045 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0085 {I13} (1974Ho37, 1955Th01). K/L=5.3 (1974Ho37), 7.8 {I20} (1967Ho16), 4.7 (1955Th01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$this |g most likely corresponds to 196.0 {I3} in {+77}Se(|a,2np|g), {+75}Ge({+7}Li,5n|g) (1982Be03), where it is placed as a g.s. transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$the measured intensity is too high as compared to that of 148.6|g. Expected intensity=30, from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ probable multiplet, partly deexcites a level at 196 keV; also contributed by a 195|g from {+74}Br 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$placement of this |g is treated as questionable. This |g is most likely a doublet with a major fraction deexciting a level at 423 keV as in ({+11}B,3n|g) (1996La13). A minor fraction may deexcite a 197 level known from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$ 66 5 (1980Ga11) 
$A{-2} for 46.8+46.3 |g rays 
E,RI$doublet from |g|g data, with most of the intensity deexciting the 228 level. 
M$|a(exp)>1.8 is deduced from an intensity balance at the 228 level (1980Ga11), requiring |d|>0.14, if mult=D+Q. This is consistent with |g(|q). RUL then rules out E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$placement is treated as questionable by the evaluators. Possibly a multiplet. Major fraction of this |g ray may deexcite a level at 423 keV as in ({+11}B,3n|g) (1996La13) and/or may be contributed by 197.1|g from {+19}F also 
E(p)=4609-4619 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from weighted average of +0.08 {I3}, 0.09 {I3} (|g(|q) in Coul. ex.), +0.10 {I3} (|g(|q) in ({+7}Li,4n|g) E=32 MeV), +0.03 {I3} (|g(|q) in (|a,p2n|g)), 0.107 {I14}, and 0.086 {I11} (from T{-1/2}=51 ps {I12} and B(E2)=0.040 {I3} (1967Ro03), B(E2)=0.0260 {I22} (1985Si08) in Coul. ex.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$average value deduced from T{-1/2}(261 level)=0.13 ns {I2} and B(E2)=0.0070 {I6} (1967Ro03), 0.0040 {I4} (1985Si08). Use of T{-1/2}=0.91 ns {I8} (1970Be79) leads to |d=0.35 {I5}. Lower |d value is supported by |d=-0.04 {I5} deduced from |g|g(|q) data in {+78}Kr |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$average value (of 0.13 {I2} and 0.096 {I14}) deduced from T{-1/2} (from (|g,|g'),(1970We01)) and B(E2)(|^)(Coul. ex.)=0.0211 {I18} (1967Ro03), 0.0115 {I20} (1985Si08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$18 {I2} in (|a,p2n|g) is too low by a factor of |?3 
|d(Q/D)=+4.7 {I+38-15} from |g(|q) in (d,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. 
ce(K)/ce(L+M)=10.6 (1954Th39). |a(K)=0.013 for this transition used as normalization for other |g-rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from Adopted Gammas. Other: |d=-0.04 {I5} from |g|g(|q) of 345|g-261|g (1973Lu07), assuming M1 for 345|g. |d must be nonzero since level is populated in Coul. ex. 
$K/(L+M)=8.0 (1954Th39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=+0.006 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I8} for |g|g(|q) of 136|g-261|g, assuming |d=-0.04 {I5} for 261|g 
$K/(L+M)=8.6 (1954Th39) 
M$|a(K)exp and K/(L+M) imply almost pure E2 for 136|g, in disagreement with |d=0.25 from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.008 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I14} for 300|g-307|g (1973Lu07) 
MR$from |a(K)exp (1954Th39). |g|g(|q) (1973Lu07) does not give a unique value 
$K/(L+M)=10.8 (1954Th39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp agrees with M1 or E1. But J|p change favors M1. |g|g(|q) agrees with pure dipole mult. 
A{-2}=+0.135 {I28}, A{-4}=-0.036 {I38} for 345|g-261|g (1973Lu07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=+0.332 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I2} for 1115|g-217|g (1970Be79,1969Be82). In deducing |d evaluators consider A{-2} only. A{-4}=+0.06 does not agree with the required spin sequence 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|g ray given by 1988NaZP in the table only as a 11/2+ to 13/2+ transition. The assignment here is based on level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) (1994Sp05). Others: +0.088 {I30} or -4.9 (1967Ro03). B(E2)=0.0395 {I33} (1967Ro03) and T{-1/2}=51 ps {I12} give |d=0.107 {I14}. B(E2)=0.0260 {I22} (1985Si08) gives |d=0.086 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$average of values from T{-1/2} in (|g,|g') and B(E2) values from 1967Ro03 and 1985Si08 
$A2=-0.005 17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in 1994Sp05. Other: |d=+0.21 {I5} or -12 {I+5-23} from |g(|q) in 1967Ro03. |d=12 {I+5-23} gives T{-1/2}=20 ps {I2} which disagrees with 1.3 ps {I4} from (|g,|g') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. Other: 207.2 {I4} (1974Co11) 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.25 {I2} (1967Sc14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+80}Br IT decay (1970Ne11,bent-crystal measurement) 
M$from ce data in {+80}Br IT decay and (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,|g), where all the intensity was assigned to 271 level. From (p,n|g) reaction, it seems some of this intensity may belong with 357 level 
|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 (1973MeZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.43 {I24} 
M$|g(|q) in (d,2n|g). Transition rates and |DJ|p give M1 (1984Do02) 
|a for M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E,RI$271.372 and 271.4 form a doublet. Intensity given here is from (d,2n|g) 
If E1, B(E1)(W.u.)=8|*10{+-6} {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1970Ne11 (bent-crystal spectrometer measurement). Others: 37.07 {I3} (1972De67), 1960Sc04, 1950Li07, 1939Va02 
M$from |a measurements. |g|g(|q) and ce-ce(|q) data are also consistent with this assignment 
CC$1.59 {I10} (1960Sc04). Others: 1950Li07, 1950Ro07, 1944Be07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$from 1972De67. Others: 1960Sc04, 1954Li19, 1950Li07, 1950Ro07, 1939Va02 
M$from |a value. |g|g(|q) and ce-ce(|q) data are consistent with M3 and E1 assignments to 49 and 37 transitions, respectively 
CC$ 298 {I11} (1992Ch25), 314 {I13} (1980MeZY); from relative intensities of x-rays and |g-rays. 
EKC$ |a(K)exp=210 {I21} (1992Ch25), 208 {I8} (1980MeZY). Others: |a(K)exp=298 {I30} (1960Sc04), Ice(L1)/Ice(L3)=1.00 {I25} (1952Mi38), 1952Ha14, 1950Li07. 
(49|g)(37|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.125 {I23} (1978Ta24). (49 ce)(37ce) (|q): A{-2}=0.28 (1955Sh91), 0.292 {I24} (1956Br96) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$ |a(K)exp=0.0079 {I11} (1978Do06), 0.0111 {I9} (1994HoZU) 
M$from |a(K)exp in 1994HoZU; |a(K)exp in 1978Do06 gives E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.23 {I6} (1978Do06), 0.128 {I18} (1994HoZU) 
M$from |a(K)exp in 1978Do06; |a(K)exp in 1994HoZU gives E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I9} (1978Do06), 0.0070 {I9} (1994HoZU) 
M$from |a(K)exp in 1994HoZU. |a(K)exp in 1978Do06 gives E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ |a(K)exp=0.45 {I5} (1978Do06), 0.321 {I27} (1994HoZU). 
$ |a(L1)exp=0.053 {I7} (1978Do06) 
M$from |a(K)exp in 1994HoZU; |a(K)exp in 1978Do06 gives M1 
Placement from (d,2n|g) results 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.030 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.027 {I18} (1973MeZM); A{-2}=-0.03 {I1} in differential PAD (1973Pl07) 
M$from 'adopted gammas' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$for 218.9|g+219.4|g, I|g=51 {I2} 
A{-2}=+0.092 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.012 {I25} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
MR$from 1977Do08. Other: +0.15 (1973MeZM) 
A2=+0.105 15, A4=-0.018 18 (1973MeZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.045 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I25} (1977Do08); A{-2}=+0.237 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.031 {I19} (1973MeZM) 
MR$+0.015 {I50} (1977Do08), +0.10 (1973MeZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$from branching in (n,|g). I|g=42 {I2} for doublet 
$ A{-2}=+0.37 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=+0.351 15, A4=0.+018 19 (1973MeZM) 
MR$+0.8 to +3.0 (1977Do08); -0.10 (1973MeZM). Value from 1977Do08 disagrees with mult=M1 from ce data in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.281 {I29}, A{-4}=+0.015 {I29} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=-0.234 15, A4=-0.0017 17 (1973MeZM) 
MR$from 1977Do08. Other: -0.05 (1973MeZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=+0.005 15, A4=-0.013 18 (1973MeZM) 
MR$from 1973MeZM 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$19 {I1} for 294.1|g+294.3|g 
$ A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=-0.121 15, A4=-0.006 17 (1973MeZM) 
MR$+0.08 {I5} if J(331)=3 (1977Do08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$0.75 {I15} (1977Do08). I|g(110|g)/I|g(367|g) is high by a factor of 5 as compared to that in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$1.8 {I3} (1977Do08). I|g(330|g)/I|g(367|g) is high by a factor of 5 as compared to that in (n,|g) 
Placement suggested by 1977DaZS and 1973MeZM 
A{-2}=-0.077 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I3} (1973MeZM) 
MR$-0.10 (1973MeZM) if J(366)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=+0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=+0.019 15, A4=-0.018 18 (1973MeZM) 
MR$+0.06 (1973MeZM) if J(366)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.64 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I5} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=-0.516 17, A4=+0.038 15 (1973MeZM) 
MR$-1.6 {I1} (1977Do08), +0.10 (1973MeZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7} (1977Do08). Other: 1973MeZM 
A2=-0.277 16, A4=+0.051 17 (1973MeZM) 
MR$-2.2 {I5} (1977Do08), -0.01 (1973MeZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$13.1 {I20} (1977Do08). Possible doublet, a weak component may be associated with 765 level 
A{-2}=-0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1977Do08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$16.2 {I20} (1977Do08) 
A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1977Do08) 
MR$-0.50 {I15} if J(958)=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$1.1 {I2} (1977Do08). I|g is high as compared to Branching in (n,|g). Part of this intensity may belong with 737 level as suggested by 1977Do08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$ DCO |? 0.85 (2011Wa21). A value of 1.0 is expected for |DJ=2,Q or |DJ=0 (J to J), dipole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$2000Ra25 proposes that 1348|g depopulates the (13)+ level of band 1, but the coincidence data in 2011Wa21 do not support such an assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$2000Ra25 (Nucl. Phys. A678, 258) proposed that the 1348|g depopulated the 3658, (13)+ level, but the |g|g-coin data in 2011Wa21 did not support this assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min). 
MR from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. Other: 0.45 {I+14-15} from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp in {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min) 
B(E2)(W.u.): same value from measured B(E2)|^=0.0508 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min). 
MR other: M1+93(2)% E2 yields |d=3.6 {I+7-5}, 290|g-276|g A{-22}=0.060 {I9} and A{-44}=0.14 {I14} (1980MuZR). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 37.8 {I4} from {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min) and 35.1 {I27} from Coulomb excitation. Others: 46 {I23} from (p,|g) and 45 {I4} from (n,n'|g). 
B(E2)(W.u.): same value from measured B(E2)|^. 
MR |d(D,Q): -3.0 {I5} or -0.08 {I5} from (p,|g); the latter |d implies a T{-1/2}(566 level) value which is inconsistent with RUL and |d(290|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2)|^=0.00226 {I13}. Other: B(E2)W.u.=1.10 {I+21-17} using the T{-1/2} and adopted |g-ray properties. 
MR sign from (p,|g). Other: +0.08 {I4} from (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 491.7 {I6} from (p,|g) and 491.2 {I3} from Coulomb excitation 
RI weighted average of 14.9 {I15} from (n,n'|g) and 15.3 {I12} from Coulomb excitation. Other I|g: 26 {I4} from (p,|g), 157 from (d,n|g) if I|g(767)=100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2)|^=0.0315 {I16}. Other: 10.7 {I12} from adopted T{-1/2} and 767.01|g-ray properties. 
E$weighted average of 766.9 {I5} from {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (57.28 min), 767.0 {I1} from (p,p'|g), and 767.2 {I4} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 767.0 {I7} from (p,|g) 
MR from B(E2)|^ and T{-1/2} in Coulomb excitation. Also others: -0.16 {I3} and 0.33 {I5} from |g(|q), from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)<452 upper limit exceeds RUL=300 
M,MR E1 or M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp<0.05, |a(L)exp<0.003 in {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min); adopted |D|p=no. |d from |a(L)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 31.26 {I23} from {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min), 33 {I6} from (p,|g), 33 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 32 {I4} from Coulomb excitation 
MR +0.32 {I20} or +1.6 {I5} from (p,|g); evaluator rejects latter value because it gives B(E2)(W.u.)=241 {I93} (possible, but abnormally high for this mass region [see 1979En04]). Other: |d=0.40 {I+4-5} from M1+13.5(25)%, 553|g-276|g A{-22}=-0.182 {I27} and A{-44}=-0.02 {I5} (1980MuZR). 
M D+Q from (p,|g); |p from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2)=0.058 {I5}. 
E$weighted average of 828.33 {I17} from {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min), 828.2 {I7} from (p,|g), and 828.7 {I5} from Coulomb excitation 
RI Weighted average of 100 {I7} from |b{+-} decay (18.5 min), 100 {I4} from Coulomb excitation, 100 {I22} from (p,|g) and 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g). 
MR other: +0.16 {I+5-10} (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from Coulomb excitation; D+Q from (p,|g). 
MR weighted average of -0.24 {I3} from (p,|g) and -0.193 {I12} from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation and -0.19 {I+3-4} in (d,n|g). Other: 0.30 {I4} from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1996Ja09); the weighted average -0.21 {I2} including the other datum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 835.5 {I5} from {+81}Se |b{+-} decay (18.5 min), 835.4 {I11} from (p,|g), 836.5 {I4} from (|a,p2n|g), and 836.5 {I5} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$weighted average of 42 {I17} from (|a,p2n|g), 41 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 23 {I7} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 60 {I30} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average 789.6 {I7} from from (p,|g) and 789.1 {I5} from |b{+-} decay (18.5 min). 
RI from (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
M,MR from (d,n|g) for intraband |g. 
RI I(679|g):I(1109|g)=3.2 {I8}:6 {I2} from (|a,p2n|g), but 2.1:1.7 from (d,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI see comment on 679|g from 1946 level. 
M Q from (d,n|g); M2 unlikely since it would lead to T{-1/2}(1946 level)>0.6 ns from RUL (|g|g coin observed from that level); intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 260.2 {I2} (1969Zo06), 260.0 {I2} (1971Do09), 260.306 {I10} (2015Kr02). 
M from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp (1971Na18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 767.3 {I10} (1969Zo06), 767.0 {I5} (1971Do09), 766.6 {I5} (1977Kr18 - shown for {+81g}Se decay with I|g=0.15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2015Kr02. Corresponding E|g is probably 789.1 {I5} listed in 18.45-min decay dataset. In 1969Zo06, no determination for isomeric decay. In 2015Kr02, not have much evidence for this line to belong to the 18.45-min decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI unresolved from transition in {+81}Kr. From adopted branching and I(561|g) here, I(835|g)=2.3 {I4} is expected for this transition. I|g=17.7 {I8} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR average of abs(|d)=0.102 {I4} if J=1/2, 0.072 {I3} if J=3/2 (from B(E2) and T{-1/2}). 
$A{-2}'=0.000 {I13} for |g(|q) (1972Ro27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from B(E2)|^ and T{-1/2} assuming J=3/2; abs(|d)=0.157 {I10} if J=1/2. A{-2} from |g(|q) consistent with 0, as expected for J=1/2 or 3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$ unweighted average of 13 {I1} (1972Ro27) and 19 {I2} (1985Si08). 
MR +0.25 {I13} or -3.2 {I+10-22} from |g(|q) (1972Ro27); the latter solution implies B(E2)(W.u.)>180, making it less plausible. 
$A{-2}'=+0.029 {I27} for |g(|q) (1972Ro27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$ unweighted average of 87 {I1} (1972Ro27) and 81 {I2} (1985Si08). 
MR absolute value from B(E2) and T{-1/2}, if J(767 level)=5/2; sign from |g(|q) in 1972Ro27. Other: -0.16 {I3} or +7.8 from |g(|q) (1972Ro27); 0.33 {I5} from |g(|q) measurements (A{-2} and A{-4}) in 1996Ja09. 
$A{-2}'=-0.014 {I10} for |g(|q) (1972Ro27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$ unweighted average of 87 {I4} (1972Ro27) and 76 {I4} (1985Si08). 
MR -0.193 {I12} from A{-2} for 561|g(|q) combined with beam-561|g-276|g triple angular correlation data (1972Ro27); 0.30 {I4} (1996Ja09) from |g(|q). 
$A{-2}'=+0.016 {I10} for |g(|q) (1972Ro27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$ unweighted average of 13 {I4} (1972Ro27) and 24 {I4} (1985Si08). 
M stretched Q from |g(|q) measurements (1996Ja09). Other |g(|q) in 1972Ro27. 
$A{-2}'=+0.33 {I2} for |g(|q) (1972Ro27); <+0.219 expected for J=7/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 275.94 {I5} (1969Zo06), 275.9 {I1} (1971Do09), 275.6 {I3} (1969Ba34), 275.8 {I5} (1967Ra08), and 275.993 {I10} (2015Kr02). 
RI from 2015Kr02. Others: 100 (1969Zo06), 100 (1971Do09), 100 {I3} (1969Ba34 - rescaling 10.2 {I3}), 100 {I5} (1967Ra08 - rescaling 10.2 {I5}). 
MR 0.45 {I+14-15} from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp, but datum probably too imprecise to be reliable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 538.2 {I1} (1969Zo06), 538.2 {I2} (1971Do09), 538.0 {I4} (1969Ba34), 539.0 {I5} (1967Ra08), 538.188 {I14} (2015Kr02), 538.2 {I1} (1977Kr18). 
RI from 2015Kr02. Others: 6.9 {I7} (1969Zo06), 7.7 {I8} (1971Do09), 6.3 {I16} (1969Ba34 - rescaling 0.64 {I16}), 7.8 {I20} (1967Ra08 - rescaling 0.8 {I2}), 7.3 {I4} (1977Kr18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 290.08 {I5}(1969Zo06), 289.9 {I1} (1971Do09), 290.141 {I10}(2015Kr02), 290.19 {I5} (1977Kr18), 289.9 {I5} (1967Ra08), 289.9 {I3} (1969Ba34). In 1969Ba34, authors could not prove it as doublet. 
RI weighted average of 82 {I8} (1969Zo06), 82 {I9} (1971Do09), 84.3 {I8} (2015Kr02), 87 {I4} (1977Kr18), 85 {I4} (1967Ra08 - for both placement - rescaling 8.7 {I4} ), 82 {I3} (1969Ba34 - rescaling 8.4 {I3}). In 1969Ba34, authors could not prove it as doublet. 
MR 1.23 {I22} from |a(K)exp, >0.64 from |a(L)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 566.04 {I5} (1969Zo06), 565.9 {I2} (1971Do09), 566.0 {I4} (1969Ba34), 566.1 {I5} (1967Ra08), 566.131 {I14} (2015Kr02), 566.11 {I7} (1977Kr18). Other: 552 and 560 (1962Su07). 
RI weighted average of 33.0 {I33} (1969Zo06), 32.5 {I50} (1971Do09), 29.9 {I29} (1969Ba34 - rescaling 3.05 {I30}), 28.4 {I29} (1967Ra08 - rescaling 2.9 {I3}), 31.8 {I3} (2015Kr02), 33.3 {I15} (1977Kr18). Other: 37 {I8} for doublet 552 and 560 (1962Su07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 649.8 {I1} (1969Zo06), 649.7 {I3} (1971Do09), 649.996 {I14} (2015Kr02), 649.9 {I1} (1977Kr18). 
RI weighted average of 3.5 {I4} (1969Zo06), 4.0 {I4} (1971Do09), 3.79 {I4} (2015Kr02), 4.00 {I35} (1977Kr18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 178.3 {I1} (1969Zo06), 177.9 {I3} (1971Do09), 178.424 {I20} (2015Kr02), 178.4 {I1} (1977Kr18). 
RI weighted average of 0.98 {I10} (1969Zo06), 0.80 {I8} (1971Do09, recalculated by evaluator), 0.94 {I4} (2015Kr02), 0.93 {I6} (1977Kr18). 
M E1 or M1(+E2), based on |a(K)exp alone. If M1+E2, |d<0.28 from |a(L)exp, <0.84 from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 290.1 {I1} (1969Zo06), 290.0 {I7} (1971Do09), 289.9 {I3} (1969Ba34), 290.0 {I5} (1977Kr18), 289.9 {I5} (1967Ra08). 
RI weighted average of 1.9 {I5} (1969Zo06), 2.5 {I5} (1971Do09), 3.2 {I8} (1977Kr18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E 552.4 {I1} (1969Zo06), 552.5 {I2} (1971Do09), 552.1 {I4} (1969Ba34), 553.0 {I5} (1967Ra08), 552.456 {I14} (2015Kr02), 552.44 {I8} (1977Kr18). 
RI weighted average of 12.5 {I12} (1969Zo06), 13.6 {I14} (1971Do09), 13.2 {I20} (1969Ba34 - rescaling 1.35 {I20}), 14.7 {I29} (1967Ra08 - rescaling 1.5 {I3}), 13.6 {I1} (2015Kr02), 13.6 {I9} (1977Kr18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 828.27 {I5} (1969Zo06), 828.2 {I2} (1971Do09), 827.7 {I3} (1969Ba34), 829.0 {I5} (1967Ra08), 828.432 {I14} (2015Kr02), and 828.37 {I15} (1977Kr18). Other: 832 (1962Su07). 
RI weighted average of 40.2 {I40} (1969Zo06), 43.9 {I44} (1971Do09), 40 {I5} (1969Ba34 - rescaling 4.1 {I5}), 25 {I6} (1962Su07), 48 {I5} (1967Ra08 - rescaling 4.9 {I5}), 43.6 {I4} (2015Kr02), 44 {I2} (1977Kr18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI from 1977Kr18. Other: 835 {I2} - reported in 1969Zo06, however, comparable 834.1|g was expected from contaminant {+83}Se, an upper limit I|g <0.0003% was reported for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 787 {I2} (1969Zo06), 789.2 {I5} (1971Do09), 789.2 {I7} (1977Kr18 - not placed in the level scheme). 
RI weighted average of 0.4 {I1} (1969Zo06) and 0.38 {I5} (1974Ve12 - rescaled I|g=0.039 {I5} (in level scheme) relative to I|g(275.990)=100 instead of 10.23, I|g=0.930 {I5} in Table I appears to be a misprint). Other: < 0.2 (2015Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g estimated by authors from peak containing {+80}Kr impurity line; E|g=290.0 {I1}, I|g=5.7 {I8}, A{-2}=+0.33 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I8} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Pol=0.24 {I11} for |g contaminated by an {+80}Br transition for which Pol is slightly negative; 1986Fu04 estimate Pol|?+0.4 for the 640.6|g alone. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E 46 keV {I2} from 1965Em02. 
|a(K)exp from I(K| x ray)/I|g if |w(K)=0.618 (value of |a(K)exp of 1965An01 corrected by the evaluators for the improved value of |w(K)). 
ECC from absolute I|g compared to the total 6.13-min activity. The latter was determined from the activity of daughter {+82}Br (35.282 h). 
M from |a(exp), |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from fig.4 in 1977Do08. E=856.80 keV {I9} in table 2 in 1977Do08, E=856.2 keV {I4} from 1984Fe01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$questionable placement as measured energy disagrees with level energy difference 329.0 keV; not included in least-squares fitting 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$questionable placement as measured energy disagrees with level energy difference 635.5 keV; not included in least-squares fitting 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 356.6 {I1}, 100 {I3} (1982Ze02). 
M,MR$D(+Q) from R(DCO) in coincidence with 609|g; |D|p=no from linear polarization in 1989Wi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 224.4 {I1}, 66 {I4} (1982Ze02). 
M,MR$D(+Q) from R(DCO)=0.95 {I4} gated on D 356|g; |D|p=no from linear polarization in 1989Wi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 572.1 {I2}, 9.5 {I10} (1982Ze02) 
M,MR$R(DCO)=1.02 {I3} gated on D 356|g and R(DCO)=0.98 {I3} gated on D 510|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 609.6 {I1}, 44 {I3} (1982Ze02) 
M$Q from R(DCO)=1.69 {I5} gated on D 225|g and R(DCO)=1.50 {I7} gated on D 356|g; |D|p=no from linear polarization in 1989Wi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1064.6 {I2}, 19.2 {I15} (1982Ze02) 
M$R(DCO)=1.53 {I12} gated on D 225|g and R(DCO)=0.93 {I11} gated on Q 609|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1974Kr27 doubly place a 442|g as depopulating the 779- and 3137-keV levels. The level energy difference from the 779-keV level is 442.5 keV whereas it is 443.5 keV from the 3137-keV level. 2015Kr02 find that the transition is well fit as a singlet and thus conclude that its contribution to the placement from the 3137-keV level is negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1973Fe08 placed this |g ray in {+83}Se |b{+-} decay (70.1 s) only. 
RI$other: 0.32 {I12} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.88 {I8} (1974Kr27), 0.8 {I1} (1973Fe08). 
E$placed by 1973Fe08 and 1974Kr27 as depopulating the 1810-keV level. However, E|g differs by more than 12|s from the level energy difference and thus, 2015Kr02 propose a placement as depopulating the 1239-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=322.2 {I3}, I|g=0.10 {I5} observed in 1973Fe08 
RI$other: 0.28 {I5} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.86 {I11} (1974Kr27). 
E$questionable placement as measured energy disagrees significantly with level energy difference=328.94 keV; not included in least-squares fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: 4.00 {I15} (1974Kr27), 4.5 {I3} (1973Fe08). 
E$questionable placement as measured energy disagrees with level energy difference=609.59 keV; not included in least-squares fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.48 {I9} (1974Kr27). 
E$adopted J|p's suggest an E5 or M6 multipolarity for this transition; not included in the adopted levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$adopted J|p's suggest an E5 or M6 multipolarity for this transition; not included in the adopted levels. 
RI$other: 0.31 {I8} (1974Kr27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=2072.4 {I7} and I|g=0.4 {I1} observed in 1973Fe08; unplaced transition with E|g=2075 {I2} and I|g=0.5 {I1} observed in 1974Kr27. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement by evaluator based on data in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g). Placement is supported by observed coincidences with 225|g and 356|g in 1974Kr27. The 1042|g is unplaced in both 1974Kr27 and 1973Fe08. 
RI$others: 1.82 {I8} (1974Kr27), 1.5 {I1} (1973Fe08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=473 {I1}, I|g=0.25 {I5} observed in 1974Kr27. 
RI$other: 0.21 {I5} (1973Fe08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1974Kr27 place a 1093 {I1} transition with I|g=0.39 {I12} from the 1091.9-keV level. This, however, results in an energy mismatch of 10|s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=1110.2 {I9}, I|g=0.71 {I5} observed in 1974Kr27. 
RI$other: 0.6 {I1} (1973Fe08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=1665 {I2}, I|g=0.80 {I9} observed in 1974Kr27. 
RI$other: 0.8 {I1} (1973Fe08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.6 {I3} (1974Kr27) 
E$questionable placement as measured energy disagrees significantly with level energy difference=635.52 keV; not included in least-squares fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transitions with E|g=665.0 {I3} and I|g=4.3 {I2} observed in 1974Kr27. 1973Fe08 place a transition with E|g=664.8 {I1} and I|g=4.7 {I3} as depopulating a level at 1021 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=1684.2 {I10}, I|g=0.3 {I1} observed in 1973Fe08. 
RI$other: 0.65 {I8} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=2419.9 {I4}, I|g=0.6 {I1} observed in 1973Fe08. 
RI$other: 0.60 {I8} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placed by evaluator after introducing the 2134-keV level found in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g). |g not placed by 1974Kr27. 
RI$other: 0.54 {I6} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.96 {I6} (1974Kr27), 1.0 {I1} (1973Fe08). 
E$questionable placement as measured energy disagrees with level energy difference=1245.06 keV; not included in least-squares fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=1435.8 {I3}, I|g=1.2 {I1} observed in 1973Fe08 
RI$other: 1.28 {I9} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 1974Kr27. Alternate placement by 1973Fe08 is from the 2737-keV level, however, this results in population of a 1021-keV level, the existence of which could not be confirmed by 2015Kr02. Thus, the placement of 1974Kr27 is adopted here. 
RI$others: 0.94 {I9} (1974Kr27), 0.9 {I3} (1973Fe08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced transition with E|g=2045.2 {I5}, I|g=1.0 {I1} observed in 1973Fe08 
RI$other: 1.39 {I15} (1974Kr27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this |g ray is placed from a 3856 level in recent high-spin studies by 2005Fo05 and 2006As07 with an intermediate |g ray of 1419 keV which was not seen by 2004Zh27 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this |g ray has not been seen in any of the two more recent heavy-ion |g-ray studies (2005Fo05,2006As07) thus has been omitted in Adopted Levels, Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$R{-593|g-1227|g}(22|')=0.95 {I5}; R{-593|g-1227|g}(46|')=0.97 {I4} 
$15/2- for final level given in table 3 of 2006As07 is a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. 
TI$155 {I22} if 2660|g feeds the g.s.; 206 {I22} if 2660|g feeds the 5.1 level. I|b{+-}(g.s.)=2.3 {I23} has been used to yield I(|g+ce)(|g rays to g.s.)=97.7 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$deduced by compiler from intensity balance at 4.37 level, assuming the level decays only by a gamma transition, which is mostly converted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$note that 2016Ur04 use a value of 0.889 {I21} which was a value given in literature for E|g=48.3 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|DJ=0 or 2 from 589.1|g-875.2|g(|q), but |DJ=2 is ruled out by 662.9(|DJ=1)-801.5 and 589.1-875.2(|DJ=2) cascades from 1464 level to 5/2- g.s., since it would require |DJ=3 for 801.5|g which is unlikely (2021Ny01) 
$589.1|g-875.2|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.047 {I10} 
MR$from measured intensity ratio I|g(110.9)/I|g(159.1)=0.65 {I4}. 
MR$Other: 0.44 {I15} from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.047 {I10} 
M,MR$1999Ge01 reported a M1 multipolarity, however, the |a(K)exp value and the ratio of intensities suggest an E2 admixture. Using I|g(110.9)/I|g(159.1)=0.65 (and an estimated uncertainty of 5% based on Fig. 4), one obtains |d=0.24 {I2}. Alternatively, using |a(K)exp=0.047 {I10}, |d=0.44 {I15}. In either case, the sign of the mixing ratio cannot be determined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in 1999Ge01: Phys. Rev. C59, 82 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (2015Cz01: Phys. Rev. C92, 0141328). Other: 0.24 {I2} in {+88}Br Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 
CC$2017Cz01 list 0.054 {I10} from 1999Ge01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from Table I of 2017Cz01, E|g=111.3 in authors' level-scheme Fig. 4 
M$from 2015Cz01 and also from {+88}Br Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 
CC$2017Cz01 give 0.56 {I10} from 2015Cz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M,MR$from estimated |a(exp), and assuming 50% uncertainty for estimating |d 
E$|g not seen but required by |g|g-coin data with gate on 259.1|g showing 121.6 and 363.6 |g rays. E|g is from level-energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from {+88}Br Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.15 {I4} or -4.5 {I+7-10} from (111.0|g)(159.1|g)(|q) and 4 -> 2 -> 1 spin sequence for 270, 159 and 0.0 levels. Larger value of mixing ratio is rejected since it is inconsistent with internal conversion coefficient measurement from 1999Ge01 (Phys. Rev. C59, 82). which gives M1+E2 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from PPP (prompt cube) and DDP (delayed-delayed-prompt cube) ratios. 2015Cz01 mention in the text that the value is total |g intensity. It is the photon intensity according to e-mail reply of Sept 22, 2015 from W. Urban. 
$(111.0|g)(159.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.022 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.025 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$(113.9|g)(159.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.009 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.042 {I25} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.04 {I7} or +4.8 {I+26-13} from (113.9|g)(159.1|g)(|q) and 3 -> 2 -> 1 spin sequence for 273, 159 and 0.0 levels. Larger value of |d(Q/D) is less likely as dominant E2 transition is expected to result in long half-life of the 273-keV level, which is not observed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. 2015Cz01 in Table 1 list 26.3 
TI$from |g|g-coin data, 2015Cz01 estimate the transition intensity of the unobserved 26-keV transition to be the same as the photon intensity of the 285.6|g 
M$based on the 26- and 126.6-keV competing transitions, 2015Cz01 state that multipolarity of the 26-keV transition is not E1, and that it should be the same as for the 126.6-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$(159.3|g)(285.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.089 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.023 {I29} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.5 {I1} or +7.8 {I+46-23} from (159.3|g)(285.6|g)(|q) for 4 -> 3 -> 1 spin sequence for 445, 286 and 0.0 levels. The 285.6-keV transition is assumed as stretched quadrupole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$(172.0|g)(113.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.055 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.022 {I50} 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.04 {I6} or +13 {I+81-6} from (172.0|g)(113.9|g)(|q) for 4 -> 3 -> 2 spin sequence for 445, 273 and 159 levels. Other: |d(Q/D)=+0.64 {I12} or -13 {I+7-100} for 3 -> 3 -> 2 spin sequence for 445, 273 and 159 levels. In this analysis, |d(Q/D)=+0.04 {I7} was assumed for the 113.9-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(118.7|g)(172.0|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.066 {I31}, A{-4}=+0.054 {I68} 
$|d(Q/D)=0 from (118.7|g)(172.0|g)(|q) for 5 -> 4 -> 3 spin sequence for 564, 445 and 273 levels. Other: |d(Q/D=+0.90 {I+32-20} or -13 {I+8-|@} for 4 -> 4 -> 3 spin sequence for 564, 445 and 273 levels. Sign of larger mixing ratio of 13 should be negative, according to e-mail reply of Sept 22, 2015 from W. Urban 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1342.3|g)(172.0|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.100 {I47}, A{-4}=0.000 {I95} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.31 {I14} or +2.5 {I9} from (1342.3|g)(172.0|g)(|q) for 5 -> 4 -> 3 spin sequence, or |d(O/Q)=|d(H/O)=0 for 6 -> 4 -> 3 and 7 -> 4 -> 3 spin sequences for 1787, 445 and 273 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$(139.2|g)(1342.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.149 {I55}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I12} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.41 {I+18-14} from (139.2|g)(1342.3|g)(|q) for 7 -> 6 -> 4 spin sequence, or |d(Q/D)=+0.26 {I+11-9} for 6 -> 5 -> 4 spin sequence for 1926, 1787 and 445 levels. Value of +0.38 {I21} is deduced by the compilers from upper and lower limits of the values in 2015Cz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$according to e-mail reply received Sept 22, 2015 from W. Urban 686.4 is the correct value, not 686.1 listed in authors' Table I 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentative assignment to {+89}Br decay with T{-1/2}=0.56 s {I8} (1982Re08). It may deexcite a level at 130 in {+89}Br since no other |g more intense than the 130|g was observed (1982Re08) in {+89}Se |b{+-} decay within a time interval of 2 s, and the shape of the {+89}Br |b spectrum (1981Ho17) does not indicate any isomer in {+89}Br with T{-1/2}>2 s 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 710.1 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 709.7 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)), 709.1 {I3} ({+16}O({+58}Ni,2n|g)), 709 {I4} (Coulomb excitation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 611.8 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 611.6 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)), 612.5 {I4} ({+16}O({+58}Ni,2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 791.6 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 791.5 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)), 790.2 {I4} ({+16}O({+58}Ni,2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 995.5 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 995.5 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 996 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1685 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1683.9 {I9} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1685 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1184.9 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1185.9 {I8} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1186 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 959.1 {I8} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 960.0 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 960 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From {+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g), other: 1653 (HI,xn|g), not observed by {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g). Other: 1643 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1354.9 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1355.1 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1356 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1509.2 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1508.1 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1510 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1369.2 {I8} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1367 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1368 (HI,xn|g) 
M$(D) in {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g). The other two high-spin datasets would give a Q value based on the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1661.9 {I6} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1664.2 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1665 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1432.1 {I9} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1434 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1435 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1738.6 {I6} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1736.0 {I6} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1741 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Observed only by (HI,xn|g). DE|g was taken as 3.7 keV=1741 - 1737.3, that is, the difference between the adopted energy and that from the (HI,xn|g) dataset for the other gamma from the same level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1830 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g)), 1825 {I2} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2p2n|g)). Other: 1832 (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g), other: 1949 (HI,xn|g). 
M${+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g) gives M|g=Q. If it were M2, it would have B(M2)(W.u.)=1.5|*10{+3}, which is larger than the recommended upper limit of 1. As a result M|g=E2 is adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+40}Ca({+40}Ca,2|a|g), other: 1917 (HI,xn|g). 
M$(Q) from Level scheme, (M2) is ruled out as it would have B(M2)(W.u.)=7.|*10{+3}, which is larger than the recommended upper limit of 1. As a result M|g=(E2) is adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$E1 implied by 2000Ch07, but adopted |DJ|p implies E2 
TI$from I(|g+ce)(224|g)+I(|g+ce)(368|g). I|g=387 {I62} in 2000Ch07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$other: 0.76 {I8} from E2/M1 |g-intensity ratio (2002Ke03) 
RI$24 {I6} 
$I|g(249)/I|g(393)=13.7 {I12}/28.8 {I12} (1993Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$other: 0.62 {I11} from E2/M1 |g-intensity ratio (2002Ke03) 
RI$6 {I3} 
$I|g(267)/I|g(516)=13.3 {I11}/32 {I3} (1993Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$<5 
$This |g is placed from a 5342, (27/2+) level in Adopted dataset as in {+40}Ca({+40}Ca,|a2pn|g) (2010St05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$1882 in {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,2pn|g),({+40}Ca,|a2pn|g) (2002Ke03), which is also listed in Adopted dataset. Value of 1862 in 2010St05 could be a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)=1.9 {I5}, X(E0/E2)=0.017 {I4}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.113 {I27} (2005Ki02, evaluation) 
$|r{+2}{-0}=0.085 {I19} (2003Bo05) 
$B(E0)=0.15 {I8} (2001Ko15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$ |g not observed directly since it coincides with with strong |g from {+74}Ga decay; the intensity here is inferred from known branching ratio I|g(1204)/I|g(748) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)(E2)/I(|g+ce)(E0)=1.2 {I5} (2003Bo05) 
$|r{+2}{-0}=0.085 {I19} (2003Bo05), 0.090 {I20} (1997Ch46) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ Ice(K)=0.0386 {I9} per 100 decays of {+74}Rb (2013Du14). Ice(L)/Ice(K)=0.141 {I7} (2013Du14) 
$ |r{+2}(E0)=0.088 {I9} (2013Du14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 2022Sp04: Phys. Rev. C 106, 054305 (2022). Uncertainty from e-mail reply of May 06, 2023 from M. Spieker. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from ce and angular correlation data (1998Sk01). Other: -2.06 {I+7-23} from ({+32}S,2pn|g) (1987He01). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by 2 to 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from ce and angular correlation data (1998Sk01). Others: -1.2 {I+3-2}, -0.29 {I1}, -2.4 {I+7-38} from |g(|q) 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -1.18 {I+11-23} (1987He01) and -1.1 {I+3-2} (1990Sk06 data reanalyzed by 1998Sk01). Others: -0.27 {I1} (1998Sk01, reanalyzed data of 1990Sk06 with constrained attenuation parameter), -2.5 {I7} or -0.27 (DCO data of 1998Sk01). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -1.04 {I13} (1990Sk06), -1.0 {I2} (1990Sk06 data reanalyzed by 1998Sk01). Others: -1.9 {I+6-18} (1987He01), -0.43 {I2} (1998Sk01, reanalyzed data of 1990Sk06 with constrained attenuation parameter), -2.6 {I7} or -0.32 {I11} (DCO data of 1998Sk01). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from 1990Sk06. Other: -2.9 {I7} or -0.26 {I9} (DCO data, 1998Sk01) 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from 1990Sk06 data reanalyzed by 1998Sk01. Others: -2.70 {I13} (1990Sk06), -1.8 {I+10-15} (1987He01), -0.25 {I1} (1998Sk01, reanalyzed data of 1990Sk06 with constrained attenuation parameter). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -1.7 {I+5-8} (1987He01) and -2.52 {I19} (1990Sk06). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by 2 to 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) (1990Sk06). Others: -0.23 {I10} or -5.6 {I16} from DCO (1998Sk01). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -1.09 {I21} (1990Sk06) and -1.6 {I+3-2} (1990Sk06 data reanalyzed by 1998Sk01). Other: -0.04 {I7} or -6.8 {I7} from DCO (1998Sk01). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more 1 to 2 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -1.24 {I30} and -1.44 {I19} (1990Sk06). 
BE2W$anomalous B(E2)(W.u.) value, exceeds RUL(IS)=300 by more than 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1998Sk01 
RI$from I|g(178.95)/I|g(179.26)=90 {I4}/43 {I4} (1998Sk01) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.044 {I13} (1998Sk01) deduced from |a(K)exp(178.95|g+179.26|g)=0.022 {I3} (1998Sk01) and mult(178.95|g)=E1. |a(K)exp(178.95|g+179.26|g)=0.024 {I6} listed in 1995BeZS thesis 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$quoted as -1.18 {I+11-23} by 1998Sk01 from data of 1987He01 
A{-2}=-0.69 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.25 {I13} 
EG=253.3, RI=44 4 (1987He01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A2=-0.52 2, A4=+0.044 4 
A{-2}=-0.52 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I1} (1998Sk01) 
MR$-1.2 {I+3-2} or -0.29 {I1} (reanalysis of 1990Sk06 data by 1998Sk01). 1990Sk06 give -1.26 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-1.1 {I3} or -0.27 {I1} from A{-2}=-0.52 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I1} (1998Sk01) 
A2=-0.44 5, A4=+0.03 1 (1990Sk06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.65 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I1} (1998Sk01) 
A2=-0.65 2, A4=+0.052 4 (1990Sk06) 
A2=-0.69 3, A4=+0.06 1 (1990Sk06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=-0.01 {I3} from A{-2}=+0.24 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1998Sk01) 
MR(M3/E2)=-0.04 2 FROM A2=+0.33 4, A4=-0.04 2 (1990Sk06) 
MR(M3/E2)=-0.02 14 FROM A2=+0.25 11, A4=-0.05 5 (1990Sk06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=-0.60 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I3} (1998Sk01) 
MR=-1.09 21 FROM A2=-0.68 7, A4=+0.06 2 (1990Sk06) 
MR=-1.63 10 FROM A2=-0.61 6, A4=+0.09 2 (1990Sk06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=0.37 {I2} 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.033 {I3}. Sign from reanalysis of angular distribution data in 1990Sk06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$ not given in 2012St19, but based on earlier measurements reported in 1998Sk01, it is expected to be a strong transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0,0+ to 0+)=0.079 {I11}; X(E0/E2)=0.020 {I1} (2005Gi17) 
$q{-|K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.203 {I8}, X(E0/E2)=0.0188 {I12}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.077 {I12} (2022Ki03 evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ce data in {+76}Rb |e decay and |g(|q) in ({+12}C,2n|g) Large M1 component seems inconsistent with systematics of |d values for second 2+ to first 2+ transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+40}Ca,4p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0024 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>1.5 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0,0+ to 0+)=0.079 {I11}; X(E0/E2)=0.020 {I1} (2005Gi17) 
TI$Ice(K)=0.029 relative to I|g(424|g)=100 (2005Gi17). Evaluators have added 20% to this value to account for intensity from L, M and higher shells. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E$possible 813.9 {I3} K-conversion line in electron spectrum which may be E0 transition to 770, 0+ level 
$|r{+2}(E0,0+ to 0+)>0.007; X(E0/E2)=0.15 {I3} for 376|g, 0.009 {I3} for 1174|g (2005Gi17) 
TI$Ice(K)=0.0002 relative to I|g(424|g)=100 (2005Gi17). Evaluators have added 20% to this value to account for intensity from L, M and higher shells. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 2005Gi17 only, listed only in authors' table III, intensity or branching ratio is not available. Transition also not shown in authors' level scheme figure. The evaluators treat this transition as uncertain 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from branching ratio in 2005Gi17. Other: 8.1 {I9} in Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
$I|g(2816.6|g)/I|g(2392.8|g)=<56/100 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from delayed x-ray and |g spectra in {+63}Cu({+16}O,pn|g) reaction, 1982ClZZ give |a(K)exp<0.78, while |a(K)=0.30 for E1 and 0.40 for M1 (2008Ki07). The decay scheme supports E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1, D from |g(|q) and D+Q from |g|g(|q); (M1+E2) from |DJ|p and Weisskopf estimates for <0.39 ps half-life of level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$intensity seems too strong by a factor of |?4 as compared to that in other studies 
MR$not included in Adopted Gammas due to discrepant I|g in this study 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$intensity is too low by a factor of |?2 as compared to that of 254|g in several other studies and in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$inconsistent with |d=-0.21 {I5} in Adopted Gammas 
RI$intensity is too low by a factor of |?2 as compared to that of 874.8|g from other studies and in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.136 {I6}, X(E0/E2)=0.024 {I1}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.047 {I13} (2005Ki02 evaluation, data from 1995Gi13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1199|g is placed from three different levels by 1999Su02 in reaction data but placement from 3775 level in {+78}Rb |e decay is inconsistent with level-energy difference. 
E$ poor fit, level-energy difference=1201.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(562|g)(455|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.41 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.73 {I35} (1974Sa32), consistent with J(1017 level)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from electron detection (1995Gi13) 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.136 {I6}, X(E0/E2)=0.024 {I1}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.047 {I13} (1995Gi13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(664|g)(455|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7} (1974Sa32); consistent with J=3, 4 for 1119 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$two placements and intensity division based on in-beam |g-ray data of 1999Su02 in {+58}Ni({+23}Na,3p|g) reaction. 1981Ba40 proposed only the placement from 2764 level. Total I|g=8.89 {I20} (1981Ba40). Placement from 3774 level proposed by 1999Su02 is not consistent with level-energy difference, thus it is not included here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
RI$two placements and intensity division based on in-beam |g-ray data of 1999Su02 in {+58}Ni({+23}Na,3p|g) reaction. 1981Ba40 proposed only the placement from 3725 level. Total I|g=3.77 {I25} (1981Ba40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.240 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.051 {I11}, POL=+0.41 {I3} 
$ EG=455.0 5, IG=100 (1974Sa32); IG=64.3 (1993Bi04) 
$ A2=+0.23 2, A4=-0.01 2 (1974Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.293 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.076 {I11}, POL=+0.48 {I4} 
$ EG=664.1 5, IG=66 7 (1974Sa32); IG=54.6 (1993Bi04) 
$ A2=+0.29 1, A4=-0.04 2 (1974Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.11 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I15}, POL=+0.12 {I5} 
$ EG=692.5 5, IG=9 2 (1974Sa32) 
$ A2=+0.01 2, A4=+0.02 3 (1974Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I3}, POL=+0.15 {I21} 
$ A2=+0.12 7, A4=+0.02 9 (1974Sa32) 
$ EG=1147.5 5, IG=4.7 5 (1974Sa32); IG=3.9 (1993Bi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$large 
A{-2}=+0.020 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.188 {I24}, POL=+0.31 {I8} 
$ A2=+0.16 4, A4=+0.05 5 (1974Sa32) 
$ EG=1109.9 5, IG=14.0 14 (1974Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.199 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.057 {I25}, POL=+0.60 {I11} 
$ EG=725.0 5, IG=5.7 6 (1974Sa32); IG=7.4 (1993Bi04) 
$ A2=+0.32 5, A4=-0.08 6 (1974Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.29 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I15}, POL=-0.38 {I19}. A{-2}=+0.36 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I10} (1974Sa32). Sign of A{-2} is opposite in 1974Sa32 and 1980Ro02. 
$ EG=753.0 5, IG=2.4 3 (1974Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.294 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.091 {I12}, POL=+0.55 {I6} 
$ A2=+0.27 3, A4=-0.08 4 (1974Sa32) 
$ EG=858.7 5, IG=39 4 (1974Sa32); IG=38.0 (1993Bi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.307 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.044 {I24}, POL=+0.51 {I12} for a doublet 
$ A2=-0.24 4, A4=-0.01 5 (1974Sa32) 
$ EG=1629.8 5, IG=7.5 8 (1974Sa32); IG=6.7 (1993Bi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3}, POL=+0.53 {I9} 
$ A2=+0.29 6, A4=+0.03 9 (1974Sa32) 
$ EG=1015.0 5, IG=13.0 13 (1974Sa32); IG=18.1 (1993Bi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I5} 
$Placement is suspect. 1979He18 place this transition from 2399, 3- level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ 1402.9 (1982An06) 
RI$see 290.1|g. Transition is placed from the 4396 level by 1985Wi01 and 1982An06. A 1402.5|g is placed by 1989Gr21 from an 8469 level. The 8469 level would not likely have been populated by 1985Wi01 or 1982An06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ |s(at 30 MeV |a)=0.99 b {I10} (1971Mc12) 
E$ 455.1 (1982An06) 
A{-2}=+0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} 
A2=+0.26 2, A4=-0.06 3 (1971Mc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ |s(at 30 MeV |a)=0.78 b {I8} (1971Mc12) 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} 
A2=+0.31 3, A4=-0.05 4 (1971Mc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ |s(at 30 MeV |a)=0.56 b {I6} (1971Mc12) 
E$ 858.2 (1982An06) 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} 
A2=+0.29 5, A4=-0.10 7 (1971Mc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ |s(at 30 MeV |a)=0.35 b {I3} (1971Mc12) 
E$ 1015.3 (1982An06) 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I9} 
A2=+0.46 16, A4=+0.34 24 (1971Mc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(539)/I|g(1310)=43 {I4}/57 {I6} (1985Wi01) 
E$ 538.9 (1982An06) 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ |s(at 30 MeV |a)=0.169 b {I17} (1971Mc12) 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I12} 
A2=+0.31 15, A4=+0.02 21 (1971Mc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ 1402.9 (1982An06) 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I8} 
RI$see 290.1|g. Transition is placed from the 4396 level by 1985Wi01 and 1982An06. A 1402.5|g is placed by 1989Gr21 from an 8469 level. The 8469 level would not likely have been populated by 1985Wi01 or 1982An06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ from 'adopted gammas' 
$ |d(E2/M1)=+0.40 {I9}, deduced (by evaluators) from E2 and M1 matrix elements of 2006Be18 
$B(E2)(|_)=0.013 {I+6-4}; B(M1)(|_)=0.028 {I+2-5} 
$E2 matrix element=+0.26 {I+6-5} 
$M1 matrix element=+0.38 {I+1-3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=-1.32 {I+12-55}, deduced (by evaluators) from E2 and M1 matrix elements of 2006Be18 
$B(E2)(|_)=0.049 {I+3-9}; B(M1)(|_)=0.034 {I7} 
$E2 matrix element=+0.50 {I+2-5} 
$M1 matrix element=-0.41 {I+12-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ |d(E2/M1)=+3.2 {I+23-12}, deduced (by evaluators) from E2 and M1 matrix elements of 2006Be18 
$B(E2)(|_)=0.040 {I5}; B(M1)(|_)=0.002 {I3} 
$E2 matrix element=-0.60 {I+2-3} 
$M1 matrix element=-0.12 {I+5-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp in (p,n|g) gives E2+M1, |d=0.8 {I4} or E1+M2, |d=0.6 {I2}. |DJ|p requires E1+M2. But |d(M2/E1)=0.6 {I2} gives B(M2)(W.u.)=130 {I65} which exceeds RUL (for M2) by a factor of |?100. This would suggest that |a(K)exp data are not definite 
CC$for E1 
If E1, B(E1)(W.u.)=1.3|*10{+-6} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
IF M1, BM1W=0.0110 48. IF E2, BE2W=1040 460. 
MR$RUL of 300 for E2 would limit |d(E2/M1)(116|g) to <1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from 1971Li02 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
$Ice(K):Ice(L+M)=2.6 {I2} (1971Li02), 3.0 {I3} (1969Ha03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$intensity is in equilibrium with 50-s {+79}Kr isomer decay 
ICE(K)=98 5 
|a(K)=2.10 used for normalization of ce data for other |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E|g and I|g from |g|g and level scheme 
ICE(K)=0.055 10 FOR THE 505, 506 DOUBLET 
$|a(K)exp for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance at 149 level, assuming mult(19.1|g)=M1. 1990Sc07 give I|g=44 {I3} which is too large to explain the intensity balance at 149 and 130 levels 
M$from |g(|q) and |DJ|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.5 {I5}, +0.2 {I7} (1990Sc07) 
$|d=+1.96 {I45} from 1983Ka03 is uncertain since it is inconsistent with RUL for M2 which requires |d<0.01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.26 {I6}, -0.27 {I7}. Values of linear pol coefficients calculated from A{-2}; A{-4} and |d are -0.61 {I6}, -0.59 {I5}, which disagree with the experimental values 
$|d=+2.2 {I18} (1982Be48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.48 {I6}, +0.47 {I9} 
$A{-2}, A{-4}, POL for 1025.5|g+1025.9|g, but contribution from 1025.5 is negligible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp implies E2+M1 with |d=0.8 {I4} but is inconsistent with |DJ|p. For mult=E1+M2, |d=0.6 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp agrees better with M1 but inconsistent with |DJ|p. |d=0.44 {I18} for E1+M2 and 0.5 {I3} for M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$ce(K) and ce(L) from 1993Gi01 in {+80}Rb |e decay. 
$ |r{+2}(E0: to g.s.)=0.021 {I9}; X[(B(E0):E0 to g.s.)/(B(E2):E2 to 617,2+)]=0.022 {I2} (1993Gi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,2n|g),(|a,4n|g). Values from heavy-ion reactions relative to I|g for 248.6|g are too high 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$from 'adopted gammas'. From A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=0.38 {I10} (1967Ra12) for (639|g)(617|g)(|q), deduced |d|>+8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$I(E0)/I(E2)<0.07 (from ce data with 95% confidence limit,1993Gi01) 
$ |r{+2}(E0: to 617,2+)<0.05; X(E0/E2)<0.028 (1993Gi01,95% confidence limit) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$ce(K) and ce(L) from 1993Gi01. 
$ |r{+2}(E0: to g.s.)=0.021 {I9}; X(B(E0):E0 to g.s.)/(B(E2):E2 to 617,2+)=0.022 {I2} (1993Gi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0015 used for normalization of ce data (1981Fu03) 
A{-2}=+0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}. POL=+0.38 {I2} 
$ A2=+0.11 4, A4=-0.10 7 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3}. POL=-0.15 {I11}. |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I2} 
$ A2=-0.059 21, A4=-0.01 3 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3}. POL=+0.48 {I2}. |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I1} 
$ A2=+0.202 23, A4=0.00 4 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I4}. POL=+0.04 {I20}. |a(K)exp=0.003 {I1} 
$ A2=+0.234 20, A4=+0.03 4 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.52 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I3}. POL=-0.36 {I28} (1981Fu03). 
$ A2=+0.31 8, A4=-0.04 17 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6}, POL=+0.51 {I16}. |a(K)exp=0.0008 {I2} 
$ A2=+0.21 4, A4=-0.01 7 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from (p,2n|g) results. 1981Fu03 give I|g<0.3 
E$from (p,2n|g) 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I8} (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2}, POL=+0.51 {I9}. |a(K)exp=0.0006 {I1} 
$ A2=+0.20 5, A4=-0.09 9 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5}, POL=-0.24 {I12}. |a(K)exp=0.025 {I5} 
$ A2=-0.04 7, A4=-0.23 12 (1979Yo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.92 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I16}, POL=+0.11 {I18}. |a(K)exp=0.005 {I3}. 1970McZS give A{-2}=+0.79 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I17}; the reversal in signs of A{-2} and A{-4} should be noted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 49.57 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 49.5 {I1} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 49.5 {I2} from (|a,3n|g), and 49.59 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
M from |a(K)exp {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and RUL. 
MR from |a(K)exp in Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 266.2 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 266.2 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), and 266.7 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.23 {I15} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 1.9 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 456.73 {I3} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 456.9 {I1} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 456.6 {I2} from (|a,3n|g), and 456.9 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Other: 100 {I19} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) 
M From |a(K)exp=0.00099 {I12}, weighted average of 0.00097 {I12} from (p,n|g) and 0.0014 {I5} from Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 499.44 {I8} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 499.4 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), and 499.5 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 25.1 {I10} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 27.8 {I17} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 33.5 {I9} from (|a,n|g), and 30.6 {I13} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 549.02 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 548.9 {I1} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), and 549.1 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100.0 {I30} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 100 {I7} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), and 100.0 {I31} from (|a,n|g) 
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.00195 {I19}, weighted average of 0.00190 {I20} from (p,n|g) and 0.0025 {I7} from |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 59.65 {I15} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 59.5 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI from |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 608.45 {I8} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 608.7 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$From (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
M From |a(K)exp in (p,n|g); |d(M1,E2)|>0.33. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 446.16 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 446.3 {I1} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), and 446.4 {I1} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 243.94 {I13} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 245.0 {I5} from (|a,3n|g), and 244.1 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 5.78 {I18} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), and 8.0 {I6} from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I48} from (|a,n|g), 
M from |a(K)exp in Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 
MR weighted average of +1.8 {I+8-5} from (|a,n|g) and 1.3 {I+8-4} from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I4} in |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Others: 510.4 {I3} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 510 {I1} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I4} (weighted average of 0.0025 {I5} from (p,n|g) and 0.0025 {I7} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h)), mult.=E2(+?) with |d(D,Q)>0.7 or |d(Q,O)<0.28. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 682.3 {I1} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 682.4 {I1} from (p,n|g). Other: 682.3 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 100 {I4} from (|a,n|g) 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g); |DJ=2 from level scheme. However, D(+Q), |DJ=1 from 683|g(|q) in (|a,n|g) is inconsistent and this discrepancy is unexplained. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Other: 732.1 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) 
RI$weighted average of 42.9 {I24} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 47 {I8} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 824.2 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 823.9 {I2} from (|a,3n|g), and 824.3 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I8} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 100 {I5} from (|a,3n|g), and 100 {I21} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR D+Q from (|a,n|g); pol=-0.11 {I11} (|a,3n|g). Other |d: |?0.7 from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 873.8 {I3} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 873.4 {I2} from (|a,3n|g), and 873.9 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 59 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 62 {I6} from (|a,3n|g), and 61 {I13} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E From (|a,5n|g). Other: 446.1 {I2} in (|a,3n|g); in (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g), |g is doublet including strong component from 636 level. 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g), but transition may have more than one placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From (p,n|g). Others: 853.0 (|a,5n|g), 852.7 {I4} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$From (|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I12} (|a,3n|g), 73 {I6} from (p,n|g). 
MR |d(E1,M2)|<0.23 from |a(K)exp<0.00032 (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From (p,n|g). Other: 902.3 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 92 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 63 {I9} from (|a,3n|g). Other: I|g=137 {I7} in (p,n|g); 902|g may be complex there. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 218.2 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 219.2 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 6.3 {I16} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 6.7 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Other: 283.1 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 15.0 {I32} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
M,MR |a(K)exp from (p,n|g) allows M1 (pure) or E1+M2 (with |d=0.28 {I7}) from |a(K)exp=0.0060 {I9}; adopted |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 729.09 {I6} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 729.6 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$From {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Others: 100.0 {I32} from (|a,n|g) and 100 {I21} from (p,n|g) 
Other E|g: 729.62 {I9} from (p,n|g). 
M Other: D in (|a,n|g); adopted |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 885.0 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 884.4 {I2} from (|a,3n|g), and 884.0 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
MR Other |d: -0.73 {I+25-47} from (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 926.6 {I5} from ({+11}B,p2n|g), 926.4 {I2} from (|a,3n|g), and 926.9 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
M Stretched Q from (|a,n|g); not M2 from RUL; pol=+0.53 {I4} in (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 339.64 {I20} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 340.0 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.4 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), 932.0 {I4} from (|a,3n|g), and 931.9 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min). Others: 100 {I17} from (|a,3n|g) and 100 {I6} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 981.6 {I2} from |e decay (30.5 min) and 981.7 {I4} from (|a,3n|g). Other E|g: 980.4 {I1} in (p,n|g) for contaminated |g. 
RI Unweighted average of inconsistent data (viz. 41 {I14}) from (|a,3n|g), 45 {I14} from (p,n|g), 76 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min). The weighted average is 71 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Other: 357.8 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 34.0 {I11} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 37.3 {I27} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR from |a(K)exp in {+81}Rb |e decay. Other: E1 from (p,n|g); E1 is inconsistent with log| {Ift}=5.7 to 994 level from 3/2-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 537.60 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 537.9 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Other: 100 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
Other E|g: 537.9 {I2} in (p,n|g). 
M from |a(K)exp from Rb |e decay (4.571 h), mult.=E2(+M1) for doublet, 90% of whose I|g is assigned to this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 803.69 {I6} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 803.8 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37.4 {I11} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 32.7 {I33} from (p,n|g) 
M from |a(K)exp in Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1014.4 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 1015.3 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI from |e decay (30.5 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 388.86 {I7} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 389.0 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 56.0 {I29} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 41.8 {I28} from (p,n|g) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I6}; weighted average of 0.0028 {I6} in (p,n|g) and 0.0042 {I14} from Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 476.69 {I3} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 476.8 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 64.3 {I17} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 49 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
M Note: |a(K)exp<0.0006 in (p,n|g) but |a(K)(E1)=0.00097. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 568.90 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 569.0 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 71.7 {I20} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 53 {I5} from (|a,n|g), and 57.6 {I28} from (p,n|g) 
M From |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I3}; weighted average of 0.0016 {I4} from (p,n|g) and 0.0015 {I6} from Rb |e decay (4.571 h); D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 834.75 {I6} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 835.2 {I2} from (p,n|g). 
RI$From {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Others: 100 {I17} from (|a,n|g) and 100 {I5} from (p,n|g). 
Other E|g: 835.14 {I18} from (p,n|g) for a contaminated |g. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.00065 {I18}; weighted average of 0.00062 {I22} from (p,n|g) and 0.0007 {I3} from Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1100.3 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h), 1099.9 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min), and 1099.6 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$Same value in {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Other: 657.5 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min). Other: 100 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
M From (|a,n|g). D,E2 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Other: 1157.0 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) 
RI$weighted average of 51 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 42 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 319.09 {I10} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 319.4 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 23.8 {I25} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 36 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 537.8 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 538.9 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I38} in {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
Other data: E|g=538.9 {I2}, I|g=100 {I17} in (p,n|g). Possibly present in (|a,n|g) also. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 822.8 {I5} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 824.3 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
E|g=824.3 {I2} for doublet in (p,n|g); divided intensity given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1090.6 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 
RI$other: 7.5 {I15} in {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 40.4 {I26} from (|a,n|g) and 84 {I16} from (|a,3n|g) 
M From |g(|q) (|a,n|g) and systematics 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E From (|a,n|g); E=758.1 {I3} for doublet in (p,n|g). 
RI From (p,n|g); doublet intensity suitably divided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 742.2 {I2} from (|a,3n|g) and 742.5 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) and 100 {I13} from (p,n|g) 
M From |g(|q), pol (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Other: 987 {I1} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI From (p,n|g), suggesting |g is complex in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Doubtful branch. Seen only in (p,n|g) and too strong to have been overlooked in (|a,n|g) and (|a,3n|g), so evaluator suspects |g is misplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 33.5 {I18} from (|a,n|g) and 40 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.006 {I+6-2} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=19 {I+20-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I6} from (|a,3n|g) 
M From |g(|q), pol (|a,3n|g) 
MR Weighted average of -0.89 {I+30-20} (|a,n|g) and -0.5 {I3} (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1041.1 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Other: 94 {I13} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E for doublet, but >98% of doublet's intensity is due to this placement. E|g=644.0 {I1} for doublet in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI E|g=761.9 {I1} but I(762|g) is comparable to I(1195|g) and I(644|g) in (p,n|g), suggesting that 762|g is complex in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1194.6 {I2} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 1195.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
E$ Other: 1195.2 {I2} in (p,n|g). 
RI$ Other: 69 {I15} in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ Other: 1744.0 {I10} (p,n|g) 
RI I(1744|g)/I(1195|g)=1.4 {I5} in (p,n|g) for E|g=1744 {I1}, suggesting that 1744|g may be complex in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1108.12 {I16} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 1107.9 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Other: 95 {I15} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from (p,n|g); in (|a,3n|g), a 1216.2|g is placed from a 2192-keV level, but the 1257|g which also deexcites that level is absent in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1853 {I1} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 1854.2 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 79 {I10} (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1902.6 {I7} from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min) and 1904.3 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min). Other: 100 {I11} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR,RI From (|a,n|g). D+Q from |g(|q), magnetic and electric character from RUL. Other: |d |?-0.8 from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1363.8 {I6} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 1364.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 14 {I7} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 35 {I8} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1427.74 {I20} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 1428.9 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). Other: 100 {I11} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1874.0 {I4} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 1874.6 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 43 {I7} from {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) and 52 {I8} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E A 1176.5|g is placed in (|a,3n|g) from a 2786-keV level, but the 1809|g which also deexcites that level is absent in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1158.5 {I8} from ({+11}B,p2n|g) and 1159.5 {I2} from (|a,3n|g) 
M from |g(|q), pol (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 51 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 46 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
M D from |g(|q) (|a,n|g); systematics favor E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 46 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 44 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
M D from |g(|q) (|a,n|g); systematics favor E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from (|a,3n|g); a 1257.3|g is placed from this level in (|a,n|g), but absence of 1216|g in that reaction favors a placement of that |g from a 3392 level instead (as in (|a,3n|g)). 
M D from |g(|q) (|a,n|g); systematics favor E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from (|a,n|g). The 1428|g from (p,n|g) and {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h) is placed, instead, from the 2064 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI from I(|g+ce)=100 and |a. 
M |a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp+|a(M)exp)=4.7 {I1} (2005Ka46, 2005Ka39), 4.53 {I3} from measured |b and ce spectra (1975Va24), 5.16 {I30} (1956Do52), 3.6 {I5} (1969Ha03). |a(exp)=0.54 {I7} (1956Do52). |a(K)exp=0.50 {I7} (2005Ka46, 2005Ka39). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from Adopted Gammas 
ECC from 1956Do52. 
|a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp)=5.16 {I30} (1956Do52), |a(K)exp/|a(LM)exp=3.6 {I5} (1969Ha03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 1981FrZY report E|g=1100.3 {I5}, tentatively assigned to {+81}Kr, but associated with "long" T{-1/2} isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E strong coin seen with 446.1|g deexciting the 637 level and feeding the 190.6 level. Therefore, the 456.7|g may be a doublet deexciting both the 457 and 1093 levels. A{-2}=+0.039 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E the 510.4-keV transition is known from (p,n|g) reaction and decay studies. In (|a,n|g), it could not be seen because it was masked by the intense annihilation peak, but its existence is confirmed indirectly by coin data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI possibly a g.s. transition exists but is masked in (|a,n|g) by a more intense 729.3|g. I|g=6.7 {I4} for observed line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.37 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I13}; consistent with D+Q, but |g may have an additional placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=1000, A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4}, Pol=+0.53 {I4} for triplet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=110 {I10}, A{-2}=-0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I11}, Pol=+0.6 {I3} for doublet with {+81}Br |g; doublet dominated by this component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=250 {I10}, A{-2}=+0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3}, Pol=+0.54 {I18} for (1257|g+1258|g) doublet. Divided intensity given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Shown in fig. 5 of 1986Fu03 but absent from list of observed |g rays. Placement not included in Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
I|g=61 {I6}, A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}, Pol=+0.2 {I3} for doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=250 {I10}, A{-2}=+0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3}, Pol=+0.54 {I18} for (1257.0|g+1258|g) doublet dominated by this transition. Divided intensity given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M M1 (|d=-0.1) for I|g=187 {I8} triplet including an {+81}Br |g, based on A{-2}=-0.34 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7}, Pol=-0.19 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Pol=+08 {I3} 
$Pol datum for doublet dominated by this transition. 
I|g=20 {I2} for doublet with {+81}Br line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other: 446.1 {I5} (1977Wi08) 
I|g=138.3 {I34} for doublet. 
EKC Weighted average of 0.00268 {I26} (1979To08) and 0.0028 {I3} (1972AgZS, assuming E3-theory value for |a(K)exp(190)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from n-gated |g spectrum. I|g=103.2 {I27} in singles |g spectrum for 510|g + |g{+|+} doublet. 
|a(K)exp from n-|g coincidence data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 4.6 {I8} from n-gated |g spectrum. From adopted branching and I(682|g), I(183|g)=7.9 {I17} is expected here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 4.4 {I7} for probable doublet. From adopted branching and I(874|g) here, I(824|g)=3.8 {I8} is expected from 874 level, leaving I|g=0.6 {I11} from 1280 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 729.8 {I3} (1977Wi08) 
|a(K)exp=0.00077 {I10} (indicating mult.=M1) for multiplet consisting of 729.6 transitions and the 732|g doublet; at least half the multiplet's I|g deexcites the 920 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E tentatively placed by evaluator; a complex line with similar E|g is observed in (|a,3n|g) and placed from 976, 1828 and 2534 levels; the latter two levels do not appear to be populated in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy difference=981.52 
RI in |g singles spectrum this |g is overlapped by |g from {+41}K(p,p'|g) reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp. This conflicts with adopted mult=(M1+E2), based on |a(K)exp from Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 834.7 {I3} (1977Wi08) and 835.2 {I1} (1979To08). 
E unresolved from {+81}Br |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Tentatively placed by 1979To08, but E|g=1554.6 {I5} is reported from this level in {+81}Rb |e decay (4.571 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1088.84 
E|g=1087.3 {I1} for triplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. Other: 190.32 {I3}: weighted average of 190.4 {I2} (1970Wa38), 190.1 {I3} (1973Br32), 190.30 {I3} (1975Va24), 190.4 {I2} (1977Li14), 190.4 {I5} (1981FrZY), 190.54 {I10} (1982Gr07), and 190.4 {I3} (1968Li06). 
RI 64.5 (in 1968Li06 - value set to the strongest branch). 
M |a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp+|a(M)exp)=4.53 {I3} (1975Va24). |a(K)exp(190)/|a(K)exp(446)=190 {I30} (1975Va24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 456.7 {I2} (1970Wa38), 456.9 {I2} (1973Br32), 456.71 {I3} (1975Va24), 456.9 {I1} (1977Li14), and 456.7 {I5} (1968Li06). 
RI 3.0 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 548.9 {I2} (1970Wa38), 549.05 {I4} (1975Va24), 548.9 {I1} (1977Li14), and 547.7 {I12} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.4 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 609.0 {I10} (1970Wa38), 608.2 {I3} (1973Br32), 608.45 {I8} (1975Va24), 608.5 {I2} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 446.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 446.3 {I2} (1973Br32), 446.14 {I2} (1975Va24), 446.3 {I1} (1977Li14), and 446.33 {I10} (1982Gr07), and 446.0 {I5} (1968Li06). 
RI 22.0 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 244.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 244.2 {I3} (1973Br32), 243.80 {I8} (1975Va24), 244.3 {I2} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g coin (1977Li14). 
E$weighted average of 510.5 {I5} (1975Va24), 510.4 {I3} (1977Li14) from |g|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1981FrZY; this |g is placed by 1981FrZY only. 1977Li14 assigned |g to {+81}Rb (30.5 min) decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 729.0 {I3} (1970Wa38), 729.0 {I3} (1973Br32), 729.09 {I6} (1975Va24), 729.1 {I1} (1977Li14) from |g|g coin, and 729.7 {I10} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.4 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 339.70 {I20} (1975Va24), 339.4 {I4} (1977Li14). 1975Va24 place this |g from the 1677-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 357.7 {I2} (1970Wa38), 357.9 {I2} (1973Br32), 357.38 {I4} (1975Va24), 357.7 {I2} (1977Li14), and 357.6 {I5} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.7 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 386.09 {I6} (1975Va24), 386.0 {I3} (1977Li14). 1981FrZY placed their E|g=386.2 {I5} line in the {+81}Rb level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E from 1975Va24. Others: 537.6 {I2} (1970Wa38), 537.6 {I2} (1973Br32), and 537.6 {I10} (1977Li14), and 537.7 {I5} (1968Li06). 
RI 2.4 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 803.6 {I2} (1970Wa38), 803.4 {I2} (1973Br32), 803.74 {I6} (1975Va24), 803.5 {I2} (1977Li14), and 803.6 {I5} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.8 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI from 1975Va24. Not seen by other authors. E|g is 4|s lower than expected for this placement, so evaluator shows it as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 388.7 {I2} (1970Wa38), 389.2 {I2} (1973Br32), 388.84 {I6} (1975Va24), 389.0 {I2} (1977Li14), and 388.2 {I5} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.5 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 476.8 {I2} (1970Wa38), 476.4 {I3} (1973Br32), 476.68 {I3} (1975Va24), 476.8 {I1} (1977Li14), and 476.6 {I8} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.5 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E from 1975Va24. Others: 569.0 {I2} (1970Wa38), 568.8 keV {I3} (1973Br32), 568.9 {I1} (1977Li14), 568.8 {I8} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.6 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=835.03 
E weighted average of 835.0 {I2} (1970Wa38), 834.7 {I2} (1973Br32), 834.73 {I6} (1975Va24), 834.8 {I2} (1977Li14), and 835.4 {I10} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.7 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI from 1975Va24. Not seen by other authors. E|g is low for this placement, so evaluator shows it as doubtful. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1981FrZY; tentatively assigned to {+81}Kr, T{-1/2} designated as "long". However, 1977Li14 assign E|g=1099.9 {I2} to {+81}Rb |e decay (30.5 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 537.6 {I2} (1970Wa38), 537.6 {I2} (1973Br32), 538.2 {I1} (1975Va24) and 537.6 {I10} (1977Li14). 
RI from |g|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 601.2 {I10} (1970Wa38), 602.0 {I5} (1973Br32), 602.60 {I15} (1975Va24), 602.3 {I3} (1977Li14). Not seen by 1981FrZY, not placed by 1973Br32. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E 1981FrZY placed in their scheme an 882.8|g from the 1280-keV level in disagreement with level energy difference which is 823 keV. In the table, the 882.8|g does not appear, but an 822.8|g does. Placement not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 1091.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 1090.0 {I4} (1975Va24), 1090.4 {I5} (1977Li14). Placed by 1973Br32 only; 1975Va24 and 1977Li14 could not place |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 701.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 701.7 {I10} (1973Br32), 701.53 {I12} (1975Va24), 701.5 {I5} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E placed from this level by 1977Li14 only. Others placed |g deexciting the 701 or 1338 levels. Weighted average of 701.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 701.7 {I10} (1973Br32), 701.53 {I12} (1975Va24), 701.5 {I5} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 757.7 {I2} (1970Wa38), 757.8 {I3} (1973Br32), 758.23 {I12} (1975Va24), 758.3 {I2} (1977Li14). Not seen by 1981FrZY. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1975Va24. Others: 977.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 977.1 {I3} (1973Br32), 977.1 {I2} (1977Li14), and 978.0 {I8} (1968Li06). 
RI 0.6 (relative to I|g(190)=64.5 in 1968Li06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ weighted average of 1041.3 {I2} (1970Wa38), 1041.1 {I3} (1973Br32), 1041.25 {I5} (1975Va24), 1041.1 {I2} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ weighted average of 1069.7 {I2} (1970Wa38), 1069.2 {I4} (1973Br32), 1069.44 {I11} (1975Va24), 1069.3 {I3} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1108.6 {I2} (1970Wa38), 1108.1 {I4} (1973Br32), 1107.93 {I15} (1975Va24), 1108.0 {I2} (1977Li14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1427.3 {I3} (1973Br32), 1427.91 {I22} (1975Va24), 1427.8 {I2} (1977Li14). Not seen by 1981FrZY. 1973Br32 placed |g from a tentative 1883-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$K/K+L+=0.76$ L/K+L+=0.07 
$ce(K)(1488|g)/ce(K)(1475|g)=0.31 {I3}; ce(K)(1488|g)=4.7|*10{+-6} {I5} per 100 {+82}Rb decays (1985Ze03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)(2172|g)/ce(K)(2168|g)=4.1 {I10}; ce(K)(2172|g)=1.4|*10{+-5} {I3} per 100 {+82}Rb decays (1985Ze03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.19 {I18} 
RI$listed as 0.5 {I10} in 2021Ra20, which results in possible negative uncertainty. Authors also deduce a B(E2) value which is negative within the uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed in {+83}Rb |e decay only. Placement is questionable as it would indicate M2 or E3 multipolarity for the transition, the latter is excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$(D+Q) from |g(|q) in {+80}Se(|a,n|g), |D|p=no from level scheme. 
RI$others: 17 {I3} in {+83}Rb |e decay and 8.9 {I17} in {+80}Se(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$(D+Q) from |g(|q) in {+82}Se(|a,3n|g) and {+76}Ge({+11}B,p3n|g); E1+M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Ch32. Other values: 520.389 {I12} (1988Al01); 520.41 {I3} (1976Va03); 520.423 {I25} (1990Me15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Ch32. Other values: 552.588 {I20} (1988Al01); 552.65 {I2} (1976Va03); 552.664 {I21} (1990Me15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Ch32. Other values: 529.591 {I13} (1988Al01); 529.64 {I1} (1976Va03); 529.653 {I11} (1990Me15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: I|g(681|g)/I|g(648|g)=0.24 {I1} (1981Ca01) 
M$indicated as M1+E2 in 1981Ca01 with |d=-0.10 {I+2-3}, however, this is inconsistent with their assignment as a 5/2- to 7/2+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) in 1982Es01 and 1986Pi05 both indicate stretched Q character. 1981Ca01 found (M1+E2) multipolarity with |d=-1.43 {I+24-5}. 
RI$other: I|g(1003|g)/I|g(1012|g)=0.071 {I3} (1981Ca01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) in 1982Es01 and 1986Pi05 both indicate stretched Q character and comparison to RUL excluded M2. 1981Ca01 found (M1+E2) multipolarity with |d=0.51 {I+2-4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 9.4058 {I3} (2012Sl01), 9.396 {I3} (1993Ko45), and 9.4059 {I8} (1992Pi10). Others: 9.40 keV {I2} (1971Ru17), 9.40 keV {I3} (1972De67), 9.40 keV {I1} (1972Ko35), and 9.39 keV {I1} (1976Va03). 
MR$weighted average of 0.00129 {I3} (1993Ko45) and 0.00130 {I8} (1980Sp07). Derived from L/M-subshell conversion ratio. 
ECC$deduced from |a(K)exp/(|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp)=0.312 {I5} of the 32|g (weighted average of 0.305 {I9} (1972Ko35) and 0.315 {I6} (1980Sp07)). Ratio of K| x ray to 9.4|g=3.14 {I4} (weighted average of 3.15 {I6} (1972Ko35) and 3.13 {I5} (1971Ru17)), fluorescence yield=0.643 {I19} (1979Kr13) and |a(K)(exp)(32|g)=462 {I18} (1971Ru17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 32.1517 {I5} (2006Ve03), 32.1515 {I11} (1992Pi10), 32.1510 {I8} (1989St05), and 32.1521 {I8} (1993GoZL). Values from 1989St05 and 1993GoZL have been corrected for change in {+241}Am standard. Others: 32.16 keV {I2} (1971Ru17), 32.1 keV {I1} (1972De67), 32.14 keV {I5} (1972Ko35), and 32.16 keV {I3} (1976Va03). 
$|a(K)exp=462 {I18} (1971Ru17), corrected for fluorescence yield=0.643 (1979Kr13). 
M$from |a(K)exp (1971Ru17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$ EG=1213.5, RI=5.4 6 (1970Ha21) 
$(1213|g)(882|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.108 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} 
$|d(M3/E2)=+0.01 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$ EG=1462.8, RI=3.8 4 (1970Ha21) 
$(1464|g)(882|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.078 {I26}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7} 
$|d(M3/E2)=-0.04 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ EG=2484.6, RI=13.6 14 (1970Ha21) 
$(2484|g)(882|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.252 {I28}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4} 
MR$+0.002 {I30} for J=1, +0.79 {I15} for J=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=3927.6, RI=16.0 16 (1970Ha21) 
M$ Measured anisotropy [I|g(0|')/I|g(90|')]-1=0.59 {I6} at 8.5 mK (1992Pr06) in NMR work on oriented nuclei. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$ Measured anisotropy [I|g(0|')/I|g(90|')]-1=0.53 {I1} at 8.5 mK (1992Pr06) in NMR work on oriented nuclei. This anisotropy is larger than expected from theory which has been attributed by 1992Pr06 to possible M2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$although 1987Ha21 argued against its placement from 2345.6 level due to lack of coin, the evaluators have adopted this placement in keeping with the |b{+-} and (|a,2n|g) studies. The agreement of relative branching support this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.024 {I7} from E2 matrix element (to g.s.)=+0.35 {I5} (2002Os07), quoted as 0.024 {I3} by 2002Os07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(1016|g)/I|g(1898|g)=2.12 {i7} quoted by 2002Os07 seems in error, it is inverse of that quoted in ENSDF 
$B(E2)(|_)=0.024 {i19} from E2 matrix element (to 881.6,2+)=+0.35 {i14} (2002Os07), quoted as 0.024 {i10} by 2002Os07 
$M1 matrix element (to 881.6,2+)=+0.35 {i10} (2002Os07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(|_)=0.0058 {i14} from E2 matrix element (to g.s.)=+0.17 {i2} (2002Os07), quoted as 0.0055 {i6} by 2002Os07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(|_)=0.053 {i14} from E2 matrix element (to 881.6,2+)=+0.69 {i9} (2002Os07), quoted as 0.053 {i7} by 2002Os07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$authors obtained this intensity from observation of the strong 1897.8-keV transition and I|g(1016)/I|g(1898)=47.1 {I16}/100, taken from {+84}Kr Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Me06. Other: 304.47 keV {I5} (1970Wo08). 
RI$relative to 100.0 for 151.195|g from {+85}Kr |b{+-} decay 
EKC,ELC,EMC$determined by peak-to-|b spectrum method (1970Wo08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Wi01. 
RI$from 1989Wi01: I|g(60)/I|g(1932)=0.045 (E(|a)=21 MeV), 0.040 (E(|a)=19 MeV), 0.038 (E(|a)=16 MeV), 0.019 (E(|a)=13 MeV) 
M$from |a(exp)=7.1 {I14} (1989Wi01,from an intensity balance in delayed |g-ray spectrum). M2 is possible from |a(exp) but rejected by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$60.3 in 1989Wi01 
M$from |a(exp)=7 {I+3-2} (1989Wi01,from an intensity balance in a delayed spectrum 
RI$other: I|g(60)/I|g(1932)=12 {I2}/97 {I5} (1989Wi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(685.6|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.098 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I11} 
$|d(O/Q)=0 for J(2250)=4 
$(685.6|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=+0.25 {I15} for 685.6|g, compared to POL(theory)=+0.10 {I5} for 4 -> 2 -> 0, E2 - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(785|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.318 {I45}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I10} 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.10 {I7} for J(2350)=2, +0.82 {I23} for J(2350)=3 
$(785.0|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=+0.6 {I3} for 785.0|g, compared to POL(theory)=+0.44 {I12} for 2 -> 2 -> 0, M1+E2 - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(501.4|g)(2349.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.23 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I27} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.03 {I20} or -2.3 {I+8-15} for J(2851)=2; +0.5 {I+15-3} or +1.1 {I+10-2} for J(2851)=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(1286.3|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.092 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.016 {I54} 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.47 {I5} for J(2851)=2, -0.03 {I3} for J(2851)=3 
$(1286.3|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=+0.4 {I2} for 1286.3|g, compared to POL(theory)=+0.42 {I5} for 2 -> 2 -> 0, M1+E2 - E2 cascade; and +0.19 {I15} for 3 -> 2 -> 0, E1+M2 - E2 cascade 
$(1286.3|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=-0.48 {I22} for 1564.7|g, compared to POL(theory)=-0.12 {I3} for J -> 2 -> 0, D+Q - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(1361.6|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.319 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.013 {I33} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.06 {I2} for J(2926)=1, -0.33 {I3} for J(2926)=3, no solution for J(2926)=2 
$(1361.6|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=-0.58 {I15} for 1361.6|g, compared to POL(theory)=-0.48 {I5} for 1 -> 2 -> 0, M1+E2 - E2 cascade; -0.99 {I8} for 3 -> 2 -> 0, M1+E2 - E2 cascade 
$(1361.6|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=-0.28 {I12} for 1564.7|g, compared to POL(theory)=-0.42 {I3} for J -> 2 -> 0, D+Q - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$(1534.4|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.066 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.042 {I41} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.43 {I3} for J(3099)=2; +0.01 {I2} for J(3099)=3 
$(1534.3|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=+0.15 {I10} for 1534.3|g, compared to POL(theory)=+0.21 {I8} for 2 -> 2 -> 0, M1+E2 - E2 cascade; and +0.06 {I4} for 3 -> 2 -> 0, E1+M2 - E2 cascade 
$(1534.3|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=-0.13 {I10} for 1564.7|g, compared to POL(theory)=-0.07 {I3} for J -> 2 -> 0, D+Q - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1217.2|g)(1534.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.362 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.051 {I56} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.75 {I30} for J(3099)=3; no solution for J(3099)=1. In both cases |d(Q/D)=+0.01 assumed for 1534.3|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1389.8|g)(1361.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.12 {I20} or +2.3 {I10} for |d(1361.6)=+0.06 and J(2926)=1; -0.18 {I3} for |d(1361.6)=-0.33 and J(2926)=3 
$(1389.8|g)(2926.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.004 {I65}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I14} 
$Any value for |d(Q/D) of 2926.3|g is possible assuming |d(1389.8)=+0.12 or +2.3, and for J(2926)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1465.3|g)(1286.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.363 {I31}, A{-4}=-0.039 {I75} 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.03 {I4} or -2.1 {I2} for |d(1286.3)=+0.47 and J(2851)=2; +0.36 {I8} or +1.5 {I2} for |d(1286.3)=-0.03 and J(2851)=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$(1966.5|g)(2349.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.224 {I31}, A{-4}=-0.021 {I75} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.04 {I4} for J(4316)=2, +0.53 {I15} or +1.3 {I3} for J(4316)=3 
$(1966.5|g)(2349.6|g)(|q,pol): POL=-0.5 {I3} for 1966.5|g, compared to POL(theory)=-0.42 {I8} for 2 -> 2 -> 0, E1+M2 - E2 cascade 
$(1966.5|g)(2349.6|g)(|q,pol): POL=+0.3 {I2} for 2349.6|g, compared to POL(theory)=+0.36 {I6} for J -> 2 -> 0, D+Q - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$(2751.4|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.254 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I30} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.01 {I2} for J(4316)=2, +0.61 {I8} for J(4316)=3; no solution for |d(Q/D) for J(4316)=1 
$(2751.4|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=-0.42 {I8} for 2751.4|g, compared to POL(theory)=-0.45 {I5} for 2 -> 2 -> 0, E1+M2 - E2 cascade 
$(2751.4|g)(1564.7|g)(|q,pol): POL=+0.33 {I8} for 1564.7|g, compared to POL(theory)=+0.44 {I3} for J -> 2 -> 0, D+Q - E2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$(3758.7|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.38 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I33} 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.2 {I3} for J(5323)=2, +0.82 {I45} for J(5323)=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Fig. 7 in 2016Ur04. Authors' Table IV has incorrect entry of 3167.7, which is |g from 6094 level 
RI$compiler assumes that value of 0.3 {I1} given in Table IV of 2016Ur04 is correct, as apparent from their I|b feeding 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$(4885.6|g)(1564.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.34 {I8}, A{-4}=0.00 {I18} 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.12 {I13} for J(6450)=2, +0.84 {I35} for J(6450)=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1) deduced by compiler. 2018He09 give B(M1)=0.17 {I13} 
$B(M1): statistical uncertainty=0.01, systematic uncertainty=0.13 (2018He09) 
$B(E2): statistical uncertainty=0.0001, systematic uncertainty=0.0027 (2018He09). Compiler obtains B(E2)=0.0038 {I+69-34} 
E$this |g ray is not seen by 2018He09 but included in the calculation of side feeding corrections. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from |b{+-}. Others: 531.91 {I 13} {+86}Kr(n,|g), E=thermal, and 532.12 {I 5} from {+88}Br |b-n decay, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from (n,|g). This |g cannot be the 1840 |g seen in |b{+-} decay because the stronger |g's deexciting the 2372.35 level in |b{+-} decay have not been seen in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The transition is a poor fit and is not included in the least square adjustment to fit the energy levels. That adjustment gives 1099.04 {i8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$ (263.6|g)(1419.7|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.92 {I6}, R(46|')=0.96 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 {I4}, 
$ (263.6|g)(421.5|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.07 {I5}, R(46|')=1.04 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$( 509.1|g)(263.6|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.04 {I5}, R(46|')=1.02 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 {I4} 
$ (509.1|g)(421.5|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.11 {I5}, R(46|')=1.05 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$ (1266.6|g)(680.9|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.95 {I6}, R(46|')=0.97 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 {I4} 
$ (1266.6|g)(1577.6|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.08 {I6}, R(46|')=1.04 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$|DI|g not provided by 1986Sk02, estimated by evaluators based on |DI|g of other strongly observed transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 0.97 {I2} (1980Ho03). 
E$Unplaced in 1986Sk02; placed by 1980Ho03 on the basis of a level identified in (t,p). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 2.99 {I11} (1980Ho03). 
E$3279.67 from level energy difference. Placed from a level at 4054 by 1980Ho03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.036 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} for (752|g)(460|g)(|q) 
MR$+0.06 {I3} or 6.9 {I-12+17} for J=5 for the 2857-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} for (1517|g)(869|g)(|q) 
MR$+0.10 {I3} or +5.6 {I+16-34} for J=5 for the 3161-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} for (1523|g)(869|g)(|q) 
MR$+0.06 {I1} for J=4 and +0.46 {I11} for J=5 for the 3168-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I10} for (754|g)(1523|g)(|q) 
MR$+0.33 {I17} or +2.6 {I-9+14} for J=7 for the 3922-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only by 2011Li34. 2013Cz02 argue that this transition results from the {+70}Ge(n,n'|g) process. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$stretched Q or |DJ=0, D from |g|g(|q); the former is excluded by considering the decay of the 1328|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$9.0 {I3} given in 2013As07 is likely a typo given the overall uncertainties assigned to comparable transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LE
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(M1) and B(E2) were deduced by 2017El04 from |d(E2/M1)=0.08 {I+9-5} measured by 2016Mo34 (Phys. Rev. C 94, 054323), and known branching ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$estimated by 2017El04, the 2420|g was not seen by the authors. Also not given in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$from (790.0|g)(953.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} gives mult(790.0|g)=|DJ=1, dipole and mult(953.9|g) of |DJ=2, quadrupole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$from RUL(E2)=300 
RI$not given by 1981Ho17 since in this region accurate efficiency calibration was not possible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$from RUL(E2)=300 
RI$from intensities of feeding |g rays, I|b(28.6)=16 and |a=6.9 {I22} for |d(28.5|g)<0.24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(799|g)(707|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} 
E$in {+235}U(n,F|g), this transition is assigned to {+91}Kr; thus it is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(401|g)(655|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} 
$(401|g)(1362|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(468|g)(799|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I1} 
E$in {+235}U(n,F|g), this transition is assigned to {+91}Kr; thus it is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$in {+235}U(n,F|g), this transition is assigned to {+91}Kr; thus it is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(1255|g)(799|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I2} 
E$in {+235}U(n,F|g), this transition is assigned to {+91}Kr; thus it is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(707.6|g)(799.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.214 {I36}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} 
E$in {+235}U(n,F|g), this transition is assigned to {+91}Kr; thus it is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$not seen in {+248}Cm SF decay; consequent to exclusion of 4005.5 keV level, this |g ray is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$from (655.5|g)(707.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.129 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.090 {I27} 
RI$other: 53 {I3} (2012Mu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Mult=Q for J(1764)=4. |d(Q/D)=+0.242 {I+17-16} for J(1764)=3, +0.194 {I+15-13} for J(1764)=2 from (401.7|g)(1362.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.100 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I20} (2017Rz01) 
RI$other: 47 {I7} (2012Mu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Mult=Q for J(1764)=4. |d(Q/D)=+0.182 {I+53-48} or +2.75 {I+38-48} for J(1764)=3, +0.244 {I45} for J(1764)=2 (2017Rz01) 
M$from (1057.1|g)(707.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.062 {I33}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I74} (2017Rz01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$(1123.4|g)(707.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.095 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I33} (2017Rz01) 
RI$other: 100 {I5} (2012Mu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$(1022.8|g)(1123.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.023 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I22} (2017Rz01) 
RI$other: 53 {I3} (2012Mu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=+0.47 {I+15-11} or +1.72 {I+47-48} for J(3085)=5; +0.05 {I+12-15} for J(3085)=4 from (1254.7|g)(1123.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.180 {I43}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I94} (2017Rz01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$Q for J(3224)=6. |d(Q/D)=+0.33 {I+15-11} or +2.38 {I+95-66} for J(3224)=5; -1.39 {I+40-52} or +0.21 {I+15-16} for J(3224)=4 
M$(1393.4|g)(1123.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.122 {I58}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I123} (2017Rz01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Presumed by evaluator to be same |g as the 1121|g reported in coincidence with the 301|g in 2000PfZZ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$(799.3|g)(406.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.54 {I+24-23} or +3.5 {I+75-32} for J(301)=5/2. Mult(406.7|g)=Q for J(301)=3/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-1.90 {I15} or -0.28 {I+3-4} from (799.3|g)(707.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-0.15 {I2} from (799.3|g)(707.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}, if J=9/2 for 707.7 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$(468.5|g)(799.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.28 {I5} for J(1975)=11/2, +0.36 {I3} for J(1975)=13/2. Mult(468.5|g)=Q for J(1975)=15/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.)|?17 (B(E2)|?0.042) is a preliminary value from Coulomb excitation; the uncertainty is 10-15%. 
M Q from {+248}Cm SF decay; Coulomb excited transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; transition shown in level scheme in fig. 4 of 2000Rz02, but energy not given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M (1034|g)(769|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I1}. Linear polarization of 1034|g=+1.0 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M (1297|g)(769|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I1}. E|g=1269 in listing of |g|g(|q) data in table 1 of 2000Rz02 for the first of these transitions is assumed to be a typographical error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M D from |a(K)exp in {+93}Br |b{+-} decay; |D|p=no based on shell-model (2000PfZZ); analogy to N=57 isotone {+97}Zr and N=59 nuclides {+99}Zr and {+97}Sr. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M D from |a(K)exp determined from I(K| x ray) relative to I(ce); |D|p=no based on shell-model considerations (2001Lh01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$ absolute intensity=74 {I10} (2013Mi13, average of their value of 64% and the literature value of 84%) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$ B(E2) deduced from E2 matrix element=0.498 eb {I27} (2012Al03) obtained from measured Coulomb-excitation cross section 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$ B(E2) deduced from E2 transitional matrix element=+0.498 eb {I27} (2012Al03,2013Al05) obtained from measured Coulomb-excitation cross section 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved transition due likely to low efficiency for low energy gammas. Presence is suggested by the observation of the 834.9|g in both prompt and delayed gated spectra (2020Ge11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance, it is expected to be dipole, M1 is chosen from comparison with neighboring N=59 isotones. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$ Coulomb excitation from 0+ 
E$ a 241-keV |g ray assigned in {+238}U({+136}Xe,F|g) to deexcite the first 2+ state in {+96}Kr was not seen by 2012Al03. Instead 2012Al03 assign a 554-keV |g ray. From its time distribution and other details specified in 2012Al03, this |g ray is assigned to {+96}Kr rather than {+96}Rb. The origin of 241-keV |g ray seen in {+238}U({+136}Xe,F|g) remains unknown 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$ B(E2) from E2 matrix element=+0.66 eb {I7} (2012Al03) obtained from measured Coulomb-excitation cross section 
E$ a 241-keV |g ray assigned by 2009Ma47 to deexcite the first 2+ state in {+96}Kr was not seen by 2012Al03. Instead 2012Al03 find a 554-keV |g ray. From its time distribution and other details specified in 2012Al03, this |g ray is assigned to {+96}Kr rather than {+96}Rb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ detailed discussion in 2009Ma47 is given about the assignment of of 241|g as 2+ to 0+ transition rather than 4+ to 2+. But 2012Al03 did not observe this |g ray in Coulomb excitation experiment. Instead, they assigned a 554.1-keV |g ray to the decay of first 2+ state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$ B(E2) deduced from E2 matrix element=+0.66 eb {I7} (2012Al03, 2013Al05) obtained from measured Coulomb-excitation cross section 
E$ note that a 241-keV |g ray assigned by 2009Ma47 to the decay of first 2+ state in {+96}Kr is not seen by 2012Al03 (also 2013Al05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) in e{+2}b{+2} units. Compiler obtains B(E2)=0.12 {I+3-2} and B(E2)(W.u.)=66 {I+19-12}, uncertainties from upper and lower bounds of half-life. 2018Mo30 point out that this B(E2) value is consistent with B(E2)=0.13 {I1} for the first 2+, isobaric analog state in {+74}Kr, as expected from isospin symmetry 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$ weighted average of measured values: 4.6 {I9} and 4.4 {i13} by two different methods 
TI$ 4.5 {I+19-8} given in 2003Hu01 using a somewhat different approach for taking into account conversion coefficients 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$from ({+40}Ca,3pn|g):E=128 MeV. Others: 100 {I15} from {+76}Sr |e decay and 100 {I10} from ({+39}K,n2p|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g(DCO) in ({+40}Ca,3pn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 33 {I5} from {+76}Sr |e decay, and 52 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,3pn|g):E=128 MeV. Others: 17 (ratio of cross sections for 145 and 246 |g rays in delayed |g spectrum from IT decay), 6 {I1} from {+40}Ca({+39}K,n2p|g). 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(DCO) in ({+40}Ca,3pn|g); |p=(no) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2011Wa12. In 1995Ha13 an 1143.4|g was placed from a 2905 level 
RI$from I(1143|g)/I(1036|g)=3 {I1}/4 {I1} in 1995Ha13 in ({+40}Ca,3pn|g):E=128 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1995Ha13. E|g=1026 in 2011Wa12. In 1995Ha13 this |g was placed from a 4307 level in their band #5, but 2011Wa12 placed it from 4305 level connecting bands 3 and 5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$intensity balance at 101 level gives |a<0.6 which implies |d(E2/M1)<1. However, |g(|q) and intensity balance in in-beam |g-ray studies are consistent with |DJ=1, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$RUL<300 for E2 transitions suggests magnitude of |d<0.8 
$Note that B(E2)(W.u.) is much larger than RUL=300 for E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$E|g=146.5 {I2} (1997Ha08). I|g=56.5 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$From |g(|q), |d<0.03 for D+Q 
$R(|q)=0.60 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$E|g=162.0 {I5} (1997Ha08). I|g=4.4 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$From |g(|q), |d<0.03 
$R(|q)=0.60 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. Presence of this transition is inferred (1983Li11,1997Ha08) from (502|g)(160|g). Other: 24.78 (1983Li11) 
TI$from intensity balance at 332 level (1983Li11) assuming no side feeding 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 184.86 {I8} (1983Li11), 184.5 {I2} (1997Ha08) 
$I|g=26.5 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$$ R(|q)=1.10 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=223.2 {I2} (1997Ha08). I|g=3.6 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$I|g(223)/I|g(368)=0.21 (1997Ha08), 0.37 (1983Li11) 
$R(|q)=0.35 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=246.7 {I2} (1997Ha08). I|g=1.6 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$I|g(246)/I|g(470)=0.076 (1997Ha08), 0.123 (1983Li11) 
$R(|q)=0.31 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 469.88 {I13} (1983Li11), 470.0 {I2} (1997Ha08) 
$I|g=13.0 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$R(|q)=1.14 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 501.81 {I15} (1983Li11), 502.0 {I2} (1997Ha08) 
$I|g=26.6 (1983Li11, at 117 MeV) 
$R(|q)=1.11 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$placement is from 1997Ha08. Other tentative placement, from 8643 level (in 1986Lu08), is rejected 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$ Placement based on study by 1991McZZ 
E,RI$E|g from 1972LiZL, with I|g/I|g(103|g)=0.13 {I3}. 1981Ba40 reported E|g=46.8 and noted the absence of coincidences with any of the {+78}Kr transitions. Placement of the transition in cascade with the 103|g would lead to too many x rays (see comment on the 103|g). The placement of the 47|g in parallel with the 103|g is consistent with the I|g and I(x ray) data 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.76 {I11} (1991McZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 103.23 {I10} (1975BaWR) and 103.36 {I10} (1972De54) 
RI$from 1975BaWR relative to I|g(455|g)=100 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.10 {I2} (1991McZZ). But |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I10} (1995Gi13) suggests E2. M1 is supported in other considerations: using the experimental determination that %IT|?10, and that about 75% of the IT decay is accounted for by I|g(103|g), 1975BaWR deduced that |a(exp)|?0.3. They also quoted |a(exp)=0.25 {I5}, based on a measurement of the K-|a x rays and corrected for higher-shell conversion and fluorescence yield (the authors actually quoted I(x ray)/I|g(103|g)=0.25 {I5}, but stated that the fluorescence yield had been corrected for, so presumably the quoted value is actually |a(exp)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1 suggested by 1997Mu02 based on level lifetime and transition probability 
RI$quoted by 1992Gr09 from h. Grawe et al., 1981 Ann Rep hmi b373, 89 (1982) 
E$ 46.8 (1997Mu02), 46.9 (1982Li17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$much weaker in 1997Mu02; |?15, estimated (evaluators) from level-scheme figure 3 of 1997Mu02 
E$ 211.7 (1997Mu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Branching ratio for 105|g and 144|g is from {+79}Sr |e decay. I|g(105|g)/I|g(144|g)=15 {I1}/18 {I4} from in-beam |g ray is in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Branching ratio of 324|g and 219|g is from {+79}Sr |e decay. I|g(219|g)/I|g(324|g)=100 {I6}/18 {I3} from in-beam |g-ray is in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(414|g)/I|g(279|g)=100 {I2}/20 {I2} (1990Sk02) is in disagreement with value from 1993Ho15 adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$in ({+28}Si,3p|a|g) (1995Su27), a cascade 2189|g-1956|g feeds the 45/2+ level at 11834, but from |g|g coin, 2189|g and 1956|g are parallel above the 11834 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.54 {I7} (1982De36) allows E1 or M1 but |DJ|p supports E1. |a(K)exp=4.1 {I3} given by 1981Li12 is probably in error (1982LiZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.12 (1982De36) gives M1 or E1 but |DJ|p supports M1. |a(K)exp=0.56 {I24} given by 1981Li12 is probably in error (1982LiZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$915|g from 2505 level is the main transition, the 507|g is weak. Its branching estimated from thickness of arrows in level scheme figures given by 1998Ta07 and 2003We13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.02 {I14}. 
$ T{-1/2}=8 ns {I2} given for 83.7|g is most likely contributed by the half-life of the feeding 77.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D from DCO ratio in {+55}Mn({+29}Si,2pn|g); adopted |D|p=no. For B(E2)(W.u.)<300, mult.=M1(+E2) with |d<0.5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E for presumed doublet in |e decay; see comment under {+81}Sr |e decay. E|g=486.5 from {+68}Zn({+19}F,|a2n|g). 
RI from (|a,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M (D+Q) from DCO ratio in {+55}Mn({+29}Si,2pn|g) for intraband |g. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0459 {I+48-41} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=269 {I+28-24} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from {+81}Sr |e decay; in {+79}Br(|a,2n|g), a 477|g is placed from both the 631-keV level and a 1464-keV level, based on |g|g-coin data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M Q from |g(|q) in {+79}Br(|a,2n|g); an M2 transition could not compete with the D transition deexciting same level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E see comment on 1211|g from 1513 level. 
M D from |g(|q) in {+79}Br(|a,2n|g); |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|g seen in {+53}Cr({+31}P,2pn|g) also, but placed differently there. 
M from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn({+19}F,|a2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Reported in {+68}Zn({+19}F,|a2n|g) only. Possibly masked by strong 760|g in other reaction studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Reported in {+68}Zn({+19}F,|a2n|g) only, where a (presumably different) 958.5|g (also present in {+53}Cr({+31}P,2pn|g)) appears in cascade with this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E others: 1677 ({+19}F,|a2n|g), 1674 ({+29}Si,2pn|g) 
M Q from DCO ratio in {+55}Mn({+29}Si,2pn|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 86.2 keV {I2} (1977Li14) and 86.6 keV {I5} (1981FrZY). 
RI From (97.9 {I4})/(1+17.66 {I31}) 
M From |a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp+|a(M)exp)=2.57 {I30} (1956Do52). [|a(K)/(|a(L)+|a(M))=2.22 (E3 theory)]. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
From level scheme in fig. 1 of 1989Ta09. Weak |g which appears in some gated spectra but not in others. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 86.2 keV {I2} (1977LiZP) and 86.6 keV {I5} (1981FrZY). 
M from |a(K)exp/(|a(L)exp+|a(M)exp)=2.57 {I30} (1956Do52). |a(K)/(|a(L)+|a(M))=2.22 (E3 theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} from {+83}Sr |e decay suggests multipolarity is a mixture of M1 and E2. However, B(E2)(W.u.)>1.5|*10{+3} is deduced from T{-1/2}<150 ps (1973Br32) and |d. Therefore, 1973Br32 exclude any E2 component. If T{-1/2}|?1.2 ns (see comment with 99-keV level), B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) are in agreement with M1+E2 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+83}Sr |e decay. However, I|g=96 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g). Evaluator adopts the first value, since B(E2)(W.u.)>300 if I|g>38. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR$others: 1.6 |< |d |< 16 from |g|g(|q) in {+83}Sr |e decay, +0.4 {I+4-2} from |g(|q) in {+76}Ge({+11}B,4n|g),{+76}Ge({+10}B,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+76}Ge({+11}B,4n|g),{+76}Ge({+10}B,3n|g), E1+M2 is excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+83}Sr |e decay, |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+83}Se |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+83}Sr |e decay, |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+83}Sr |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$D from |g(|q) in {+80}Se({+6}Li,3n|g), |D|p=yes from level scheme 
MR$-9 {I+3-13} from {+76}Ge({+11}B,4n|g),{+76}Ge({+10}B,3n|g) would result in too large a B(M2) strength, assuming E1+M2 multipolarity for the transition as derived from the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g ray not observed in 1980Ga17, which estimate intensity as smaller than 0.1% that of the 737|g intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1/L2=9.1 {I2} (2014In02); L1/L3=16.8 {I4} (2014In02); L1/(L2+L3)=5.9 {I1} (2014In02), 9.6 {I16} (1972Mo16); L/M=6.3 {I2} (2014In02), 5.5 {I5} (1972Mo16); M1/(M2+M3)=24.0 {I23} (2014In02). 
E$from 2014In02. Other: 5.23 {I9} (1972Mo16) 
TI$from intensity balance assuming no direct population of the 5.2-keV level. From |DJ=2,|D|p=yes, I|b(5.2)<0.25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$K/L=5.2 {I2}, L/M=5.5 {I6} (1972Mo16), |a(K)exp=29.3 {I35}, K/L=5.5 {I1}, L1/(L2+L3)=2.8 {I2}, K/M=30 {I2} (1968Et01). 
E$from 2014In02. Other: 42.33 {I15} 1972Mo16. 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce)=247 (2000Sh49) and |a. Others: 5.3 {I5} (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} (1968Et01). 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce)=1.77 (2000Sh49) and |a. Others: 1.52 {I6} (1982Gr07), 1.37 {I10} (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.014 {I2}, K/(L+M)=10 {I2} (1968Et01). 
RI$others: 1.46 {I11} (1982Gr07), 1.78 {I24} (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0065 {I5}, K/(L+M)=8 {I2} (1968Et01). 
RI$others: 5.52 {I20} (1982Gr07), 5.2 {I4} (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0071 {I3}, K/(L+M)=7.4 for 381.2 and 381.5-keV doublet transitions (1968Et01). 
RI$other: 46.9 {I16} (1982Po04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0014 {I2} (1968Et01). 
RI$others: 14.7 {I5} (1982Po04), 15.4 {I4} (1982Gr07), 16.9 {I12} (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0016 {I4} (1968Et01). 
RI$others: 5.3 {I2} (1982Po04), 5.41 {I12} (1982Gr07), 5.25 {I38} (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.32 {I6} (1982Gr07), 0.40 {I9} for multiply placed transition, also placed as depopulating a 1808-keV level (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0071 {I3}, K/(L+M)=7.4 for 381.2 and 381.5-keV doublet transitions (1968Et01). 
RI$other: 8.3 {I8} (1982Po04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=722.7 {I5} with I|g=0.053 {I15}, while 1973Br32 place a 722.4 {I6} transition with I|g=0.05 {I2} as depopulating a 1808-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=808.7 {I3} with I|g=0.136 {I10}, 808.5 {I8} transition with I|g=0.08 {I4} unplaced by 1973Br32. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=902.95 {I30} with I|g=0.24 {I13}, while 1973Br32 place a 903.2 {I4} transition with I|g=0.21 {I2} as depopulating a 2147-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1005.1 {I2} with I|g=0.073 {I7}, while 1973Br32 place a 1005.4 {I5} transition with I|g=0.08 {I3} as depopulating the 2090-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1010.35 {I20} with I|g=0.093 {I7}, while 1973Br32 place a 1010.8 {I4} transition with I|g=0.11 {I3} as depopulating the 1749-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=645.8 {I2} with I|g=0.160 {I15}, while 1973Br32 place a 645.5 {I4} transition with I|g=0.27 {I6} as depopulating the 1749-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=935.8 {I4} with I|g=0.095 {I20}, while 1973Br32 place a 935.4 {I4} transition with I|g=0.15 {I3} as depopulating a 2178-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1035.4 {I4} with I|g=0.12 {I2}, while 1973Br32 place a 1035.3 {I4} transition with I|g=0.15 {I4} as depopulating the 2090-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: <2.04 (1982Gr07) and <2.08 (1973Br32) for doublet transition, also placed from the 1799-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$likely corresponds to E|g=659.6 {I4} with I|g=0.80 {I6} observed in 1982Gr07. 1973Br32 observe a 659.1 {I3} transition with I|g=1.21 {I14} which they multiply place from 760-, 1083-, and 1695-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1054.45 with I|g=0.68 {I2}, while 1973Br32 place a 1054.7 {I3} transition with I|g=0.72 {I7} as depopulating a 1054-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.096 {I7} (1982Gr07), 0.09 {I2} for multiply placed transition, also placed as tentatively depopulating a level at 2147 keV (1973Br32). 
M$from the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.13 {I4} (1982Gr07), 0.18 {I5} for multiply placed transition, also placed as tentatively depopulating the 737-keV level (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4} (1968Et01). 
RI$others: 2.85 {I11} (1982Gr07), 3.02 {I21} (1973Br32). 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) with A{-2}=+0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I11} for 438|g-762|g cascade (1973Br32). 
M,MR$other: from |g|g(|q) in 1973Br32, 0.03|< |d |<0.37 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1277.8 {I4} with I|g=0.095 {I15}, 1277.8 {I4} transition with I|g=0.15 {I2} unplaced by 1973Br32. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1296.1 with I|g=0.435 {I14}, while 1973Br32 place a 1296.5 {I3} transition with I|g=0.46 {I4} as depopulating the 2056-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=630.9 {I3} with I|g=0.10 {I2}, while 1973Br32 place a 630.8 {I6} transition with I|g=0.12 {I4} as depopulating a 1054-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe a doublet E|g=1382.6 {I6} and E|g=1384.9 {5} with combined I|g=0.512 {I20}, E|g=1382.6 {I6} with I|g=0.16 {I4} unplaced by 1973Br32. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1050.6 {I3} with I|g=0.375 {I15}, while 1973Br32 place a 1050.7 {I4} transition with I|g=0.35 {I5} as depopulating the 2135-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1649.5 {I5} with I|g=0.120 {I10}, while 1973Br32 place a 1648.8 {I5} transition with I|g=0.07 {I1} as depopulating the 1749-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.46 {I5} (1982Gr07), 0.56 {I6} for multiply placed transition, also placed as depopulating the level at 2135 keV (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=652.8 with I|g=0.25 {I3}, while 1973Br32 place a 652.5 {I4} transition with I|g=0.33 {I8} as depopulating the 1695-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.460 {I15} (1982Gr07), 0.49 {I4} (1973Br32), for a multiply placed transition, also placed as depopulating 1044- and 2147-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: <2.04 (1982Gr07) and <2.08 (1973Br32) for doublet transition, also placed from the 1038-keV level. 
M$D+Q from A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7} for 994|g-762|g cascade (1973Br32); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in 1973Br32, 1.2 |< |d |<5.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=674.0 {I3} with I|g=0.23 {I2}, while 1973Br32 place a E|g=673.9 {I4} transition with I|g=0.23 {I3} as depopulating the 1916-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=709.1 {I4} with I|g=0.050 {I8}, while 1973Br32 place a E|g=710.6 {I6} transition with I|g=0.09 {I2} as depopulating the 1749-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=916.91 {I4} with I|g=0.441 {I13}, while 1973Br32 place a 916.9 {I3} transition with I|g=0.43 {I4} as depopulating a 2020-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1044.0 with I|g=1.16 {I4}, while 1973Br32 multiply place a 1044.3 {I3} transition with I|g=1.20 {I16} as depopulating 1044-, 1085.5, and 2147-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1098.1 with I|g=0.86 {I3}, while 1973Br32 place a 1098.4 {I3} transition with I|g=0.89 {I6} as depopulating the 1103-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1130.41 {I15} with I|g=0.133 {I8}, while 1973Br32 place a 1130.7 {I4} transition with I|g=0.13 {I3} as depopulating a 1695-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 4.28 {I11} (1982Gr07), 4.13 {I22} (1973Br32). 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in 1973Br32, 2.3 |< |d |<7.0 
M$D+Q from A{-2}=+0.203 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.103 {I24} for 1147|g-762|g cascade (1973Br32); |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.80 {I3} (1982Gr07), 0.76 {I4} for multiply placed transition, also placed as depopulating a level at 2020 keV (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=2015.0 with I|g=0.153 {I10}, while 1973Br32 place a 2015.0 {I4} transition with I|g=0.15 {I2} as depopulating a 2020-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.260 {I8} (1982Gr07), 0.27 {I3} for multiply placed transition, also placed as tentatively depopulating the level at 2056 keV (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.316 {I10} (1982Gr07), 0.36 {I3} for multiply placed transition, also placed as tentatively depopulating a level at 2147 keV (1973Br32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1973Br32 tentatively place a 838 {I1} transition with I|g=0.03 {I3} as depopulating the 1598-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1038.55 {I25} with I|g=0.29 {I3}, while 1973Br32 place a 1038.8 {I3} transition with I|g=0.20 {I7} as depopulating a 1044-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1973Br32 place a 1331.6 {I8} transition with I|g=0.05 {I3} as depopulating the 2090-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe a single 1396.7 {I8} transition with I|g=0.061 {I8} which could correspond to the closely spaced 1396.0-and 1397.6- keV transitions observed by 2000Sh49. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1086.3 {I3} with I|g=0.116 {I18}, while 1973Br32 place a 1086.5 {I4} transition with I|g=0.13 {I2} as depopulating a 1085.5-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe a doublet E|g=1382.6 {I6} and E|g=1384.9 {5} with combined I|g=0.512 {I20}, while 1973Br32 place a 1385.4 {I4} transition with I|g=0.35 {I7} as depopulating a 1808-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=1765.7 {I4} with I|g=0.050 {I6}, while 1973Br32 place a 1765.2 {I5} transition with I|g=0.08 {I3} as depopulating a 1808-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1982Gr07 observe E|g=2147.64 with I|g=0.570 {I17}, while 1973Br32 place a 2147.6 {I4} transition with I|g=0.62 {I4} as depopulating a 2147-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=18.1 {I17} 
M$R(DCO)=1.40 {I9} gated on Q 1017|g (2006Ga10). 
MR$other: +1.5 {I+10-8} (1985Zh09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=24.2 {I9} 
M$R(DCO)=1.73 {I7} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.93 {I9} gated on Q 999|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=15.2 {I8} 
M$R(DCO)=1.27 {I8} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.11 {I9} gated on Q 823|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=70 {I3} 
M$R(DCO)=1.08 {I4} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.00 {I9} gated on Q 752|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=12.5 {I14} 
M$R(DCO)=0.31 {I2} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.44 {I5} gated on Q 752|g (2006Ga10). 
MR$-0.9 {I+3-4} from 1985Zh09 is calculated assuming J|p=13/2+ for 1943-keV level (adopted J|p=15/2+). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-0.9 {I+3-13} from 1985Zh09 would result in too large a B(M2) strength, assuming E1+M2 multipolarity for the transition derived from the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.2 {I5} 
M$R(DCO)=1.83 {I13} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.05 {I9} gated on Q 1103|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2006Ga10. E|g=425.4 {I4} in 2009Sc22 is 3 keV different from E|g derived from level energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=11.7 {I9} 
M$R(DCO)=1.07 {I7} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.98 {I7} gated on D 182|g (2006Ga10). 
MR$from |d=+0.02 {I3} or -0.01 {I2} (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=6.9 {I5} 
M$R(DCO)=1.07 {I3} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.99 {I7} gated on D 182|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.8 {I8} 
M$R(DCO)=0.77 {I5} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.56 {I8} gated on Q 752|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=18.9 {I25} 
M$R(DCO)=0.60 {I4} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.98 {I12} gated on D 1620|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=6.0 {I4} 
M$R(DCO)=0.58 {I4} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.62 {I22} gated on Q 752|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.7 {I4} 
E$level-energy difference=103.7. Other: 104.2 (2006Ga10). 
M$R(DCO)=2.7 {I10} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.6 {I4} gated on D 182|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.0 {I8} 
M$R(DCO)=0.82 {I12} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.02 {I6} gated D+Q 258|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.2 {I4} 
M$R(DCO)=1.0 {I3} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.28 {I15} gated on D 100|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=43.2 {I18} 
M$R(DCO)=0.97 {I4} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.97 {I9} gated on Q 1096|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.1 {I3} 
M$R(DCO)=0.52 {I7} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.06 {I7} gated on D 405|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=12.5 {I5} 
M$R(DCO)=0.55 {I3} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.96 {I4} gated on D 182|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2006Ga10. E|g=597.3 {I5} in 2009Sc22 is 1.9 keV different from E|g derived from level energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=6.0 {I4} 
M$R(DCO)=0.51 {I3} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.98 {I6} gated on D 362|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=6.6 {I11} 
M$R(DCO)=1.28 {I10} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=2.11 {I16} gated on D 182|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.2 {I3} 
M$R(DCO)=0.45 {I24} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.98 {I7} gated on D 362|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=13.8 {I8} 
M$R(DCO)=0.45 {I2} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.57 {I9} gated on Q 970|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=1 {IAP} 
E$from 2006Ga10, |g not observed in 2009Sc22. 
E$questionable placement, as |D|p of levels would indicate E3 or M4 multipolarity, both of which result in transition probabilities well above RUL. Not included in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.4 {I4} 
M$R(DCO)=0.54 {I4} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.53 {I8} gated on Q 1096|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=14.2 {I12} 
M$R(DCO)=1.1 {I5} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=0.99 {I10} gated on Q 1096|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, not used in the fitting procedure. Level-energy difference=396.6 
M$R(DCO)=0.60 {I10} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.8 {I3} 
M$R(DCO)=2.06 {I14} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.8 {I6} gated on D 362|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.4 {I5} 
M$R(DCO)=1.14 {I17} gated on Q 752|g (2009Sc22), R(DCO)=1.9 {I3} gated on D 182|g (2006Ga10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$Initial level energy of 6422.6 in table I of 2009Sc22 is incorrect 
M$R(DCO)=2.2 {I6} gated on D 182|g/362|g (2009Sc22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
MR$From |a(exp) as deduced from the intensity balance in {+84}Rb IT decay 
CC$From intensity balance in {+84}Rb IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_comment:
RI$Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LWM) of 53.7 {I32} (1984La02), 52.5 {I11} (1979Er03), 50.5 {I5} (1969Kn05), and 44.7 {I11} (1982Gr07). Other: 45.1 {I24} (1976Sl07) and 45.5 (1970Pa09) 
M,MR$From |a(exp) as deduced from the intensity balance. |d=0.83 {I10} from |a(K)exp. 
CC$From intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
RI$Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LWM) of 61.3 {I29} (1984La02) and 60.0 {I15} (1982Gr07), 51.8 {I11} (1979Er03), and 49.8 {I5} (1969Kn05). Others: 69 {I6} (1976Sl07) and 82 {I9} (1970Pa09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$From |a and I(|g+ce)=100-I(|g+ce)(219|g) 
$The B(M1)(W.u.)=0.4 {I1} given by 1991Do04 is in error, as it is based on |a|?62 from the tables of Rosel et al (1978Ro22), which do not include the L1 contribution to |a. If one takes |a=361 from BrIcc for the 3.4-keV M1 transition, the result is much lower, e.g. B(M1)(W.u.)|?0.08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From |a and I(|g+ce)=55 {I18}, derived from authors' B(E2)(W.u.) 
M$A{-2}>0 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.0 {I7} (1991Do04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$previous value of 151.159 corrected to 151.195 by B. Singh; May 15, 2015. GTOL rerun to deduce level energies. Thanks to Prof. K. Krane (Oregon State University) for pointing out this typographical mistake, May 14, 2015 
M$from |b{+-} decay (4.480 h). 
MR$deduced from B(E2)|^ in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (p,|g), |b{+-} decay (4.480 h), and |e decay (67.63 min). 
RI$weighted average of 0.58 {I6} from (p,|g) and 0.59 {I9} calculated from T{-1/2}=40 ps {I3} (weighted average of 40 ps {I4} from Coulomb excitation and 39 ps {I7} from (p,|g)) and B(E2)|^ from Coulomb excitation if J(281)=1/2. Other: 0.27 {I15} from |e decay (67.63 min). 
BE2W$weighted average of 2.16 {I27} from Coulomb excitation if J(281)=1/2 and 2.11 {I27} calculated from T{-1/2}=40 ps {I3} (weighted average of 40 ps {I4} from Coulomb excitation and 39 ps {I7} from (p,|g)), E|g, and I|g=0.58 {I6} from (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$from |b{+-} decay (10.756 y) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.00143 {I24} (1990Je03), 0.0005 {I1} (1980Me06) and 0.0006 {I3} (1962Al11). Weighted average is 0.0063 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (p,|g), (n,n'|g), and |e decay (67.63 min). 
RI$weighted average from (n,n'|g) and |e decay (67.63 min). 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00076 {I10}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.6 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$somewhat poor fit, level-energy difference=868.9 
E$weighted average from |e decay (64.84 d), (p,|g), and (n,n'|g). 
M,MR$deduced from B(E2)|^ in Coulomb excitation, T{-1/2}, and I|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average, from ({+7}Li,4n|g), (p,|g), and (n,n'|g). 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.074 {I8}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=146 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g). For (n,n'|g) 1980Ba29 report that contributions due to {+87}Rb are possible. 
RI$for (n,n'|g) 1980Ba29 report that contributions due to {+87}Rb are possible, but I|g is confirmed by I|g=23 from (p,|g). 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0040 {I10}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.4 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.05 {I+7-2}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=28 {I+44-11}. If E1, B(E1)(W.u.)=7|*10{+-4} {I+12-3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Bo26, curved-crystal spectrometer. 
ECC,EKC,ELC,EMC$determined by peak-to-|b spectrum method (1970Wo08) 
RI$the uncertainty of 0.5 represents statistical and fitting uncertainty only (1980Me06); evaluators include 1% additional systematic uncertainty in quadrature 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp. 
EKC$Internal-conversion spectrometer, normalized to |a(K) of several isotopes with known |a(K) (1971Vo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from B(E2)|^(281) and T{-1/2} follows I|g=0.59 {I9}. This value is in accordance with that in Adopted Gammas but disagrees with 4.5 quoted by 1973Bo24. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$as recommended by 2000He14 based on curved-crystal measurement of 1983Ku03. Others: 514.004.92 {I50} (1993Ch32,HPGe detector), 1988Al01, 513.997 {I2} (1980Me06), 513.996 {I16} (1971He20,Ge), 513.98 {I3} (1968Le03,Ge) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0059 {I3} (1971Vo06), ce spectrum normalized to |a(K) of several isotopes with known |a(K) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g tentatively assigned to {+85}Rb by 1980Me06 but assignment is confirmed by other experiments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}, POL=+0.34 {I8} (1989Wi01) 
$A2=+0.33 2 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=779.4 1, IG=79 3, A2=+0.33 4, A4=-0.01 5 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$1849.9 2 (1982Ze02) 
$A{-2}=+0.09 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I11} (1995Sc04) 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=+0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1}, POL=+0.54 {I14} (1989Wi01) 
$A2=+0.37 2 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=1183.5 1, IG=43 2, A2=+0.31 4, A4=-0.04 5 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.96 {I4} (|DJ=1,dipole gated). A{-2}=-0.48 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I20} (1995Sc04) 
MR$from DCO. Other: -0.20 {I13} from A{-2} and A{-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1365.8 2, IG=2.3 3 (1989Wi22) 
$A2=-0.80 20 (1989Wi22) 
$DCO=0.50 {I2}. A{-2}=-0.78 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I12} (1995Sc04) 
MR$from A{-2} and A{-4}. Other: |>+0.6 from DCO 
$EG=1365.9 1, IG=1.9 2, A2=-1.00 7, A4=+0.16 10 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$EG=1392.6 2, IG=2.9 3; A2=-0.80 10 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=1392.3 2, IG=2.6 2, A2=-0.75 4, A4=-0.04 6 (1982Ze02) 
$DCO=0.50 {I2}. A{-2}=-0.79 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I9} (1995Sc04) 
MR$from DCO. Other: -0.43 {I14} from A{-2} and A{-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=-0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2}, POL=+0.26 {I5} (1989Wi01) 
$A2=-0.25 3 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=349.7 1, IG=31 1, A2=-0.22 3, A4=+0.01 4 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.60 {I8}, 0.58 {I2}. A{-2}=-0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I7} (1995Sc04) 
MR$from DCO. Other: 0.00 {I5} from A{-2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=-0.27 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2}, POL=-0.21 {I7} (1989Wi01) 
$EG=227.8 1, IG=19.7 7, A2=-0.26 3, A4=+0.01 4 (1982Ze02) 
$A2=-0.27 3 (1989Wi22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=+0.50 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I10} (1989Wi01) 
$A2=+0.34 7 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=436.9 1, IG=2.8 4, A2=+0.53 5, A4=+0.14 20 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=+0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}, POL=+0.33 {I19} (1989Wi01) 
E$from |g|g, 1982Ze02 propose this |g to Be a doublet, the other component with an intensity of 37% of the total, no placement is suggested in the level scheme 
$A2=+0.28 3 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=1014.4 1, IG=26 1, A2=+0.09 3, A4=-0.07 4 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.27 {I12} (1989Wi22) 
$EG=622.1 2 (1989Wi22) 
$EG=621.7 2, IG=6.1 5, A2=-0.43 11, A4=0.00 1 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.24 3 (1989Wi22) 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I8} (1982Ze02) 
$EG=192.3 1, IG=5.7 3 (1982Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E4)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_comment:
E$from {+86}Rb IT decay 
M$E4 or (M3) from |a(K)exp and |a(exp) measured in IT decay (1969Sc10); M3 ruled out by |DJ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E4)
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
E$weighted average of 556.03 {I25} (1969Sc10) and 556.1 {I25} (1970Pa09) 
EKC,ECC$From I(K| x ray)/I|g(556) and Ice/I|g(556) (1969Sc10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.46 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.3 {I2} 
R(DCO)=1.54 {I5}, 1.2 {I2} 
M$|g(|q) and DCO are consistent with |DJ=0, dipole; however, sign of A{-4} should be negative for |DJ=0 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$ Dominant M1 character interpreted as proton spin flip from 2p{-1/2} to 2p{-3/2} 
BE2W$Limit from RUL, which leads to |d<1.1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1979Bo26. Others: 402.7 {i3}, (1971Sh01), 402.60 {i10}, and 402.578 {i20}, (1973GeYV). 
MR from {+87}Rb Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1971Sh01, but is a poor fit and not resolved by 1973GeYV from the double-escape peak of the 2554|g . Not included in the least-squares fit which gives E|g=1532.96 {I12} for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E uncertainty in energy of this weak |g seems to be underestimated by 1973BlZH and was increased by the evaluator from 0.1 to 0.2 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Note that the 1175 |g from the 1578 level may be influenced by an 1175 |g in {+85}Rb and also by the 1175|g from the 1/2-,3/2- member of the 1578 level doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
E$Note that the branching ratio for this transition is significantly smaller than the branching ratios for both 1578|g transitions from the 1578 doublet in the Adopted Levels. This suggests that one or both of the adopted branchings may be incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from a{-2}=-0.148 {I27} from |g(|q) (1964Al28). 1964Al28 also report another |d=-1.70 {I+35-40}, but rule it out because the resulting B(M1)(W.u.)=8x10{+-5} is considered to be unacceptably low. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
E$this transition was suggested as depopulating a (1/2,3/2)- state 1578.05 level in the literature. 2005Fo05 note that the two levels at 1578.05 and 1577.9 cannot be resolved based either on energy or the branching ratios (which are almost the same for both levels), however, the assignment of this |g ray to (1/2,3/2)- level seems unlikely as the population of such a non-yrast state in the fission of the compound nuclei is not expected. 
M$E3 multipolarity proposed for this |g ray as it is seen in coincidence with all the transitions above the isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$transition may be part of sequence of strong M1 transitions, similar to that which is observed above 7 MeV in {+89}Y. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$R(ADO)=1.02 {I7} 
M$From Adopted levels and consistent with the Q multipolarity determined from R(ADO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(exp). 
CC,TI$|a(exp) from intensity balance since |b feeding is negligible for a third-forbidden transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.320 {i15} (1976Bu05), 196.288 {i15} (1973GeZZ), both from Ge(Li), and 196.292 {i17} from curved-crystal spectrometer (1979Bo26). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. 
TI$from intensity balance since |b feeding is negligible for third-unique forbidden transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp. 
EKC$from 1974WoZO (also quoted in 1976Bu05). 
EKC$Other: 0.029 {I3} (1973HaZW); results in a small negative feeding of the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M,CC$|d probably small since a larger |a would result in a large negative feeding of the 362 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E|g, I|g and placement from 1972Po13. 1973He01 give E|g=196.2 {I5}, I|g=1.1 {I5}. Least-squares fit of the level scheme supports 1972Po13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Po13. Placement from 1973He01 (E|g=762.9 {I3} for doublet) 
PLACEMENT FROM 1694 LEVEL (1972Po13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g, I|g and placement from 1972Po13. 1973He01 give E|g=197.5 {I3}, I|g=9.1 {I7}. See also comment for 197.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$ (974.4|g)(221.0|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.16 {I4} consistent with |DJ=2,quadrupole --> |DJ=1,dipole cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$ (836.0|g)(809.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I8}, consistent with |DJ=2,quadrupole --> |DJ=2,quadrupole cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$ (1193.0|g)(836.0|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.17 {I5}, consistent with |DJ=2,quadrupole --> |DJ=2,quadrupole cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (809|g)(197|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=0.88 {I8}, W(46|')/W(75|')=0.95 {I6} 
$ (809|g)(974|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=1.11 {I8}, W(46|')/W(75|')=1.05 {I7} 
$ (809|g)[974|g](220|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=0.86 {I9}, W(46|')/W(75|')=0.95 {I6} 
$ (809|g)[197|g](411|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=0.87 {I8}, W(46|')/W(75|')=0.90 {I8} 
$ (809|g)[197|g][411|g](220|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=0.90 {I8}, W(46|')/W(75|')=0.95 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (836|g)(809|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=1.14 {I9}, W(46|')/W(75|')=1.09 {I8} 
$ (836|g)[809|g][974|g](220|g)(|q): W(22|')/W(75|')=0.89 {I9}, W(46|')/W(75|')=0.96 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.05 {I4} or +8.5 {I+48-22} for J(1492.98 level)=6 from |g|g(|q) in {+235}U(n,F|g) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.76 {I+13-11} or -3.5 {I+8-14} for J(1492.98 level)=5 from |g|g(|q) in {+235}U(n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$all |g|g(|q) solutions in {+235}U(n,F|g) lead to significant quadrupole admixture suggestive of mult=(M1+E2) rather than (E1+M2) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.47 {I+42-31} or +1.8 {I+26-17} for J(1127.9 level)=5 from |g|g(|q) in {+235}U(n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI$main depopulating intensity via {+90}Rb |b{+-} decay (258 s). 
$|a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=6.2 {I12} (1979Du04) 
M$|a(K)exp/|a(L)exp yields E2, M2 or M3. From atomic beam measurements, J of ground state is 0 and J of 106.9-keV isomer is 3, resulting in M3 as only possible multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(965|g)(56|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.044 {I89}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I21} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.24 {I+21-28} or +3 {I+16-3} for J(1127.9 level)=5 
$|d(O/Q)=0 for J(1127.9 level)=6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,D+Q
decay_comment:
$(288|g)(1042|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.038 {I26}, A{-4}=+0.007 {I56} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.05 {I4} or +8.5 {I+48-22} for J(1492.98 level)=6. 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.76 {I+13-11} or -3.5 {I+8-14} for J(1492.98 level)=5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$all |g|g(|q) solutions lead to significant quadrupole admixture suggestive of mult=(M1+E2) rather than (E1+M2) 
$(365|g)(965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.059 {I48}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I10} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.47 {I+42-31} or +1.8 {I+26-17} for J(1127.9 level)=5. 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.45 {I+18-16} or -1.46 {I+56-39} for J(1127.9 level)=6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(211|g)(288|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.029 {I31}, A{-4}=+0.064 {I68} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.01 {I+12-11} or +16 {I+|@-11} for J(1703.67 level)=7. 
$|d(Q/D)=+1.0 {I+11-4} or -4.4 {I+23-|@} for J(1703.67 level)=6 
$(211|g)(365|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.036 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.018 {I64} 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.07 {I5} or +8.8 {I+54-25} for J(1703.67 level)=7 and J(1127.9 level)=5. 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.06 {I42} or +8.8 {I+48-24} for J(1703.67 level)=7 and J(1127.9 level)=6. 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.81 {I+15-12} or -2.9 {I+6-11} for J(1703.67 level)=6 and J(1127.9 level)=5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR calculated by the evaluator from |a(K)exp. 
EKC Weighted average of 0.108 {I11} from I(K| x ray)/I|g and 0.110 {I10} from I(93ce(K),{+91}Sr)/I(109ce(K),{+91}Rb)=10.0 {I3} (1975Wo05). Other: 0.067 {I12} (1974Ac01). 
%I|g(109)=43.1 {I24} using adopted normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
(142.0|g)(142.2|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}; not M2 from RUL. 
M |DJ=2, Q from |g|g(|q) with |DJ=1, 142.2|g in gate. 
$ B(E2)(W.u.)=7.2 {I4} (2012Ur01); however, the evaluator obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=5.8 {I4}. Apparently 2012Ur01 did not account for the conversion coefficient. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
B(E1)(W.u.)=2.3|*10{+-6} {I7} (2012Ur01). The compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)=2.0|*10{+-6} {I6}. It seems 2012Ur01 did not account for conversion coefficient 
M |DJ=1 transition from (734.5|g)(276|g)(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 142.4-keV transition observed in coincidence spectra double-gated on the previously known 142.5-keV transition and another transition in {+92}Rb. 
RI I(142.4|g)/I(142.5|g)=0.70 assumed by 2009Hw03. 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. Existence of transition was indirectly confirmed in a coincidence spectrum double-gated on the 286.9|g and 734.5|g (authors report a 33 keV low-energy cutoff for their experiment). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI,M from {+248}Cm SF decay (2010Si17). However, I|g=4.3 from {+252}Cf SF decay (2009Hw03); reason for inconsistency is unclear (I(373|g) and I(552|g) are clearly comparable in figs. 3 and 9 of 2010Si17 in {+248}Cm SF decay, but no published spectra from 2009Hw03 include the 552|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
RI from {+248}Cm SF decay (2010Si17). Other: 43 from {+252}Cf SF decay (2009Hw03). 
M Q, |DJ=2 from {+248}Cm SF decay (2010Si17); level scheme implies |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M from 998|g-381|g(|q) in {+248}Cm SF decay assuming that 998|g is Q as suggested by similarity of E|g for {+92}Kr and {+93}Rb (2010Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E $others: 253.357 {I22} and 253.13 {I3} (1979Bo26), 253.58 {I25} (1974Ac04). 
I|g=41.1% {I16} based on recommended decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
E others: 266.87 {I3} (1979Bo26), 266.78 {I2} (1974Ac04). 
I|g=20.6% {I10} based on recommended decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E others: 323.92 {I2} (1974Ac04), 323.28 {I3} (1979Bo26; presumed misprint). 
I|g=24.1% {I11} based on recommended decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M from 998|g-381|g(|q); this assumes that 998|g is Q, |DJ=2 analogous to |g of similar E in {+92}Kr where structure is very similar to that of {+93}Rb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=99.6 
M$expected multipolarity based on level half-life with B(E2)(W.u.)=17 (2016Mi18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced by compilers from level-energy difference, |g transition not observed but required by |g|g-coin data. 2016Mi18 give E|g=32.6 {I4} 
TI$intensity given in Table I of 2016Mi18 is transition intensity i.e. I(|g+ce) deduced by the authors from number of coincidences between the 135- and 187-keV transitions, as confirmed in e-mail reply of Nov 9, 2016 from K. Miernik 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From text 0f 2005Pi13; not listed in authors' table I or ~II. 
E$Assignment of isomeric transition for this |g ray supported by E2 character and its transition intensity. 
TI$Ice(K)=68 {i7}; Ice(L)=27 {i5}; Ice(M+) assumed (by the evaluators) as 9 {i2} from 0.33(Ice(L)). Summed intensity=104 {i9}, consistent with 100 
M$From comparison of conversion electron intensity ratios with that predicted by theory (K/L=2.9 for E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$there is a |g transition of 433 from 6+ to 4+ in {+98}Sr, but 2016Cl03 find inconsistency in the yields of this line at forward and backward angles, suggesting the presence of another line, possibly belonging to {+98}Rb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 123.7 {I5} (2012Ka36) and 124.0 {I7} (2009Fo05). 2009Fo05 place this |g from 178 level 
RI$other: 19 {I3} per 100 fragments (g.s.+isomer) (2009Fo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. This transition is not observed by 2012Ka36 and 2009Fo05; placed from a 54 level by 2009Fo05 assuming the 124|g deexcites the 178 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 178.4 {I5} (2012Ka36) and 178.0 {I7} (2009Fo05). 
RI$other: 7 {I1} per 100 fragments (g.s.+isomer) (2009Fo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=379E1 {I13} 
$Other I|g values for {+208}Pb target: 2790 {I180} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 2890 {I130} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 440 {I220} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 2050 {I80} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 1500 {I150} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 450 {I60} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=500E1 {I50} 
$Other I|g values for {+208}Pb target: 2530 {I190} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 3050 {I300} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 600 {I60} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 2500 {I150} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 2090 {I110} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 640 {I40} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=413E1 {I14} 
$Other I|g values for {+208}Pb target: 520 {I120} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 1440 {I150} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 630 {I50} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 1110 {I110} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 1580 {I120} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 560 {I40} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=433E1 {I18} 
$Other I|g values for {+208}Pb target: 600 {I130} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 1570 {I130} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 640 {I60} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 1050 {I120} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 1550 {I120} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 640 {I50} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=120E1 {I20} 
$Other I|g values for {+208}Pb target: 550 {I40} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 730 {I60} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 180 {I20} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 410 {I30} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 380 {I30} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 131 {I16} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=80E1 {I30} 
$Other I|g values for {+208}Pb target: 60 {I60} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 170 {I30} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 101 {I14} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 210 {I20} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 81 {I11} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$There is a |g transition of 433 from 6+ to 4+ in {+98}Sr, but 2016Cl03 find inconsistency in the yields of this line at forward and backward angles, suggesting the presence of another line, possibly belonging to {+98}Rb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=210 {I80} 
$Other I|g value for {+208}Pb target: 50 {I16} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range 
$I|g values for {+60}Ni target: 90 {I12} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 36 {I9} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g not observed in 2007Da04 using a different reaction. 2007Da04 suggest that it may depopulate a level in a sideband. It is not included in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 503.7 4 (1989Gr07) 
DCO=0.98 {I5} 
$ I|g(45|')/I|g(90|')=1.32 {I12} for a 505|g (1972InZO,1972InZU) is consistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$No internal conversion correction was applied as the nuclei were in their fully stripped charge state, according to e-mail reply of May 17, 2020 from Ryan Llewellyn. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average (NRM) of branching ratio measurements of 56 {I3} in {+24}Mg({+58}Ni,2pn|g) (1990Ch07); 66.7 {I17} in {+58}Ni({+24}Mg,2pn|g) (1990Ch07); and 41 {I4} from relative intensity data in {+54}Fe({+28}Si,2pn|g) (2007Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$value of 82 {I4} from branching ratio data in {+58}Ni({+24}Mg,2pn|g) (1990Ch07) seems discrepant, thus not used in the averaging procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of all the three available values 
RI$value of 89 {I9} from branching ratio data in {+58}Ni({+24}Mg,2pn|g) (1990Ch07) seems discrepant, thus not used in the averaging procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$value of 72 {I17} from branching ratio in {+58}Ni({+24}Mg,2pn|g) (1990Ch07) seems discrepant, thus not used in the averaging procedure 
M$|DJ=1, dipole from DCO in {+54}Fe({+28}Si,2pn|g). Other: |d(E2/M1)|<1 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from relative intensity data. Value of 84 {I9} from branching ratio data in {+24}Mg({+58}Ni,2pn|g) (1990Ch07) seems discrepant, thus not used in the averaging procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(381)/I|g(222)=15.1 {I9}/84.9 {I9} (1990He04) 
$RI=4.6 (1990Ch07), 9.7 4 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(322)/I|g(169)=18.9 {I12}/81.1 {I12} (1990He04) 
$RI=4.8 (1990Ch07), 12.1 5 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(490)/I|g(268)=39.8 {I24}/60.2 {I24} (1990He04) 
$RI=7.4 (1990Ch07), 17.2 9 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(601)/I|g(333)=52.0 {I54}/48.0 {I54} (1990He04) 
$RI=5.5 (1990Ch07), 14.8 19 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(680)/I|g(265)=78.9 {I20}/21.1 {I20} (1990He04) 
$RI=11.0 (1990Ch07), 27.8 14 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(690)/I|g(357)=68.0 {I28}/32.0 {I28} (1990He04) 
$RI=8.4 (1990Ch07), 19.2 10 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(792)/I|g(435)=77.6 {I34}/22.4 {I34} (1990He04) 
$RI=4.0 (1990Ch07), 15.0 12 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio: I|g(864)/I|g(429)=76.6 {I43}/23.4 {I43} (1990He04) 
$RI=7.0 (1990Ch07), 11.8 12 (1990He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$ total intensity from the decay of g.s. and isomer=100.0 {I16}; some fraction (about 20 units) may belong to the decay of of 4.8-s isomer. From the present decay scheme at least 60 units must be from the decay of the 30.5-s activity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1277.5 {I3} (I|g=3) (1981Li12) placed from a 1663 level corresponds to 1276.6|g+1278.7|g doublet from 1999Do01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ A{-4} is listed as { 13 {I11}} in Table I of 2003Si06, which seems a misprint; divided by 100 here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$72 {I7} in (|a,2n|g) (1983Hi01) 
E$594.1 quoted by 1987Da05 seems a misprint 
A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.098 {I6}. DCO=1.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$5.4 {I6} for 1316.9|g in (|a,2n|g) (1983Hi01) 
A{-2}=+0.26 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I3}. DCO=0.95 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.53 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.59 {I11} 
$Signs of A{-2} and A{-4} are inconsistent with |DJ=2, Q transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ quoted by 2008Ka32 from literature, sign reversed by compilers to conform to Krane-Steffen convention 
$POL=-0.2 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.3 {I6} in {+81}Y |e decay (which implies |d(E2,M1)>2.4 and |D|p=no); intensity balance at the 79 level in (|a,xn|g) rules out E1 and M1. Compatible with |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; |g not observed. 
M$B(M1)(W.u.)=2.0|*10{+-4} {I2} is atypical for this mass region. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M authors of 1983Ar16 ((|a,n|g),(|a,3n|g)) from the |g(|q) data consider B(E1)(W.u.)=8.3|*10{+-6} 14 more likely in this mass region than B(M1)(W.u.)=5.0|*10{+-4} {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.5 {I3} (2005Ka39) 
M,MR D+Q, |d=-0.08 {I3} from (|a,n|g); M1(+E2), |d|<0.14 from |a(K)exp in {+81}Y |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 82 {I5} from {+81}Y |e decay and 80 {I8} from ({+29}Si,p2n|g). Other I|g: 32 in (|a,n|g). 
MR -0.5 {I2} from (|a,n|g); abs(|d)<0.5 if B(E2)(W.u.)<300. 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.2|*10{+2} {I+28-19} exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M D from ({+29}Si,p2n|g); pure E1 or highly mixed (|d=-1.3 {I4}) M1+E2 from (|a,n|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI limit from {+81}Y |e decay. However, I|g=200 {I20} in ({+29}Si,p2n|g) and 125 {I32} (for possible doublet) in (|a,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from (|a,xn|g). May include contribution from 929.1|g which deexcites the 2791 level in other (HI,xn|g) reactions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from ({+29}Si,|a2p|g). E=855.3 {I4} for doublet in (|a,xn|g); E|g=854.5 in ({+30}Si,|a2pn|g). 
M Q from ({+29}Si,p2n|g) for intraband |g, |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A comparable 929.3|g placed from 1740 level in (|a,n|g). 
M Q from ({+29}Si,p2n|g). For (E2), B(E2)(W.u.)=2.8E2 {I+11-6} upper bound exceeds RUL=300. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E average of 993.5 ({+31}P,p2n|g), 993.8 ({+30}Si,|a2pn|g), and 995.6 ({+29}Si,|a2p|g). 
M Q from ({+29}Si,p2n|g) for intraband |g, M2 rule out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E from (|a,xn|g). Other: 1097.5 {I5} from ({+29}Si,p2n|g). 
M Q from ({+29}Si,p2n|g); not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D from ({+29}Si,p2n|g); |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 
Other I|g: I(306|g):I(751|g)=25 {I6}:100 {I21} in ({+29}Si,p2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
other I|g: 10.6 {I28} from ({+29}Si,p2n|g). 
M D from ({+29}Si,p2n|g); |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 1194 from ({+29}Si,p2n|g) 
M DCO from ({+29}Si,p2n|g) is higher than expected for Q transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E other: 1134.3 ({+30}Si,|a2pn|g) 
M from DCO ratio in ({+30}Si,|a2pn|g) for intraband |g; |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E a comparable 1060|g from (21/2-) and 1134.8|g from from (25/2-) in the adopted dataset. The latter |g is from 29/2- state in this dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M E2 suggested by systematics (1988Mo17). 
This |g is placed differently in Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ weighted average of 79.23 {I4} (1985Li12) and 79.17 {I4} (1982De36). 
RI other: 82 {I1} (relative to I|g(124)=100) and 0.91% {I25} (1982De36 - %I|g appears to be erroneous). 
M from |a(K)exp=2.3 {I6} ((K| x ray)-|g coin, 1982De36) which implies |d(E2,M1)>2.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E 9.82 {I8} from level energy difference; transition not observed. 
TI from intensity imbalance at 79 and 89 levels, respectively, I(|g+ce)|<109 {I3} and |>12.7 {I4} (assuming mult(114|g)=M1 and I(|g+ce)(43|g) negligible). Note that |a(k)(exp)(43|g)=1.5 {I3} (2005Ka39) implies I(|g+ce)(43|g) is not negligible. An estimated value I(|g+ce)(43|g)=228 does not yield a satisfactory intensity balance to resolve the beta feeding as of the footnote. Measurement of I|g(43) is needed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference in 1993Mi11. 
M,MR from Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp=1.5 {I3} (2005Ka39; measured relative to |a(K)exp(79.2|g)). This implies mult=M1(+E2) with |d|<0.14, consistent with adopted value. 
Total intensity of 43.3|g was estimated as |?228 using |a(k)(exp)(43|g)=1.5 {I3} (2005Ka39), total intensity and |a(k)(exp) of 79.2|g: (alpha(k)(43)/alpha(k) (79))* TI (79) * correction for electron intensity of 43 by (alpha from the data/alpha(k) from 2005Ka39)=1.87 (11)/1.5 (3) =[1.87 (11)/ 2.3 (6)]* 224.8 (26)*[1.87 (11)/1.5 (3)]=0.81 (2) * 224.8 (26) * 1.25 (26) = 227.6 (2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E other: 124.17 {I4} (1982De36). 
RI other: 100 (relative) and 1.1% {I1} (1982De36 - %I|g appears to be erroneous). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI |g not observed by 1985Li12; E|g is from level energy difference in 1993Mi11, I|g is limit from 1985Li12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 408.18 {I6} (1982De36) and 408.36 {I11} (1985Li12). 
RI other: 35 {I6} (relative to I|g(124)=100) and 0.4% {I1} (1982De36 - %I|g appears to be erroneous ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}, A{-4}; attenuated due to level T{-1/2} and consistent with Q; |a(exp)>1.7 from intensity balance at 79 level rules out E1 and pure M1; excit for 79|g limits J(79 level) to 3/2 or 5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from Adopted Gammas. Not seen by 1983Ar16; probably below detection threshold (1983ArZY). 
TI |>521 from intensity balance at 89 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M authors consider B(E1)(W.u.)=8.3|*10{+-6} 14 more likely in this mass region than B(M1)(W.u.)=5.0|*10{+-4} 9. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Pol(90|')=+0.12 {I7} 
M authors consider B(E1)(W.u.)=2.6|*10{+-5} more likely in this mass region than B(M1)(W.u.)|?1.0|*10{+-3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
36<I|g<59. A{-2}=+0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}, pol (90|')=+0.25 {I17} for possible doublet are consistent with mult.=E2; polarization excludes J to (J-1) transition (1983Ar16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Pol(90|')=-0.22 {I4} 
RI I|g=94 (58+36), A{-2}, A{-4}, Pol(90|') all for a doublet. A{-2}(277.5|g) is clearly >0 from I(278|g)/I(287|g) in spectrum gated by 689|g (assuming |g(|q) from 1976Fr10 for mult=(M1) |g in {+81}Rb); this implies considerable mixing for a |DJ=1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4}, pol (90|')=+0.18 {I7} for a possible doublet with I|g=60 (31+(29)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Placement by the evaluators based on 1994Ta01. There seems to be an error in the placement of this transition in 1991Ba12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge({+12}C,3n|g). 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge({+12}C,3n|g) and {+80}Kr(|a,n|g),{+82}Kr(|a,3n|g), non-zero value of |d makes E1+M2 unlikely. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$Q from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge({+12}C,3n|g) and {+80}Kr(|a,n|g),{+82}Kr(|a,3n|g), M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge({+12}C,3n|g) and {+80}Kr(|a,n|g),{+82}Kr(|a,3n|g); E1+M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 
MR$from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge({+12}C,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$223 keV in figure 1 of 1990DoZX is incorrect because it does not fit the level diagram. Evaluator assumes 223 is typographical error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.47 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I11} (1980Ar02); A{-2}=+0.41 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I3}, POL=+0.46 {I15} for E(|a)=14 MeV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.95 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I6} (1980Ar02); A{-2}=-1.00 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I3}, POL=+0.13 {I7} for E(|a)=14 MeV and A{-2}=-0.94 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I3}, POL=0.00 {I11} for E(|a)=18 MeV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1980Ar02); A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I3}, POL=+0.52 {I10} for E(|a)=14 MeV and A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5}, POL=+0.55 {I6} for E(|a)=18 MeV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.91 {I6}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2} (1980Ar02); A{-2}=-0.83 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I3}, POL=-0.12 {I6} for E(|a)=14 MeV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.39 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I6} (1980Ar02); A{-2}=+0.46 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I4}, POL=+0.31 {I19} for E(|a)=18 MeV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=100 (1962Ya02) 
$ EG=793.1 2 (1970Re03), 793.0 5 (1981FrZY,1971Do01), 794 1 (1969Za06), 793.0 3 (1976Ia01). RI=100 USED FOR NORMALIZATION IN EACH PAPER 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$1970Re03 resolved doublet 658.3 and 660.6 with I|g=4.5 {I5} and 11.5 {I10}, respectively. Combined E|g and I|g given in other studies: E|g=660.5 {I5}, I|g=25.9 {I26} (1981FrZY); E|g=660.5 {I5}, I|g=12.6 {I10} (1971Do01); E|g=662 {I1}, I|g=16.5 {I22} (1969Za06) 
RI$ INTENSITY OF 11.5 TAKEN FROM 1970Re03 SEEMS LOW BY AP 4 UNITS FROM INTENSITY BALANCE. PERHAPS AVERAGE SHOULD BE TAKEN ?? 
MR$from evaluators' analysis of: A{-2}=-0.161 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1984Ak02) for (661|g)(793|g)|q) which is consistent with 2-2-0 cascade. 1984Ak02 give 27% {I5} E2 implying |d=0.61 {I7} 
$ (661|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=-0.23 5, A4=+0.10 9 (1970Re03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1453.4 2, IG=1.8 4 (1970Re03). EG=1453.2 5, IG=1.4 2 (1981FrZY). EG=1456 2, IG=3.8 10 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(974|g)(793|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.093 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I23} (1984Ak02) consistent with 4-2-0 cascade. A{-2}=+0.93 quoted by 1984Ak02 is likely a misprint. |a(K)exp gives E2,M1 
EKC$ AVERAGE OF 0.00063 13 (1970Re03), 0.00069 6 DEDUCED FROM ICE(K)=61 6 (1962Ya02) AND IG=79 4 
$ (974|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=+0.01 2, A4=-0.10 4 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=974.4 2, IG=79 4 (1970Re03). EG=974.1 5, IG=76 8 (1981FrZY). EG=974.3 5, IG=62.6 20 (1971Do01). 974.3 3 (1976Ia01,944.3 QUOTED IN THE PAPER SEEMS A MISPRINT). EG=975 1, IG=79 6 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.24 {I8} or +2.3 {I5}, evaluators' analysis of A{-2}=+0.032 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I25} (1984Ak02) for (602|g)[661|g](793|g)(|q) which is consistent with 3-2-2-0 cascade using |d(661|g)=+0.59. |a(K)exp gives mainly M1. 1984Ak02 give |<1.0% E2 implying |d|<0.1 
EKC$ 0.0036 6 DEDUCED FROM ICE(K)=39 6 (1962Ya02) AND IG=9.7 5. EKC=0.00155 7 IS LISTED IN 1971NDS OF A=84 FROM 1970Re03 
$ (602|g)[661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=-0.01 8, A4=-0.05 13 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=602.2 2, IG=9.9 5 (1970Re03). EG=602.2 5, IG=8.9 9 (1981FrZY). EG=602.2 5, IG=5.2 10 (1971Do01). EG=603 1, IG=10 2 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (1262|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=-0.06 13, A4=+0.09 22 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=1262.6 2, IG=2.5 2 (1970Re03). EG=1262.5 5, IG=3.5 4 (1981FrZY). EG=1265 1, IG=3.0 9 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=994.8 2, IG=4.2 4 (1970Re03). EG=994.6 5, IG=3.9 4 (1981FrZY). EG=994.6 5, IG=3.0 20 (1971Do01). EG=996, IG LE 4 (1969Za06). 
$ (994|g)[661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.02 14, A4=-0.17 24 (1970Re03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1654.6 2, IG=2.63 25 (1970Re03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FrZY). EG=1657 1, IG=2.0 7 (1969Za06). 
$ (1654|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=+0.10 23, A4=+0.3 4 (1970Re03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ EG=1144.3 2, IG=3.3 3 (1970Re03). EG=1143.9 5, IG=3.3 3 (1981FrZY). EG=1144 2, IG=1.8 7 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Note that the placement from 2448 level in 1970Re03 and 1981FrZY is in disagreement with results from (p,p'|g) and (|a,|a'|g) studies of 1973Re01 and high-spin studies 
E$level-energy difference=679.2 
$ (680|g)[602|g][661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.01 2, A4=+0.28 34 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=680.4 2, IG=4.5 4 (1970Re03). EG=680.4 5, IG=5.2 5 (1981FrZY). EG=682.0 5, IG=3.4 6 (1971Do01). EG=682 1, IG=5.9 25 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$tentative placement from a 3449 level (1981FrZY) not supported by |g|g data of 1970Re03. Placement based on high-spin data 
$ EG=1001.1 2, IG=2.9 3 (1970Re03). EG=1000.9 5, IG=2.1 (1981FrZY). EG=1001.3 5, IG=3.0 20 (1971Do01). EG=1000 4, IG=2.4 10 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$(1040|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.097 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1984Ak02) consistent with 6-4-2-0 cascade. |a(K)exp gives E2,M1 
EKC$ AVERAGE OF 0.00044 9 (1970Re03), 0.00054 11 DEDUCED FROM ICE(K)=34 7 (1962Ya02) AND IG=57 3. 
$ (1040|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.02 3, A4=-0.02 4 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=1039.8 2, IG=58 3 (1970Re03). EG=1039.5 5, IG=57 6 (1981FrZY). EG=1039.6 5, IG=37.0 20 (1971Do01). EG=1039.8 3 (1976Ia01). EG=1040 1, IG=50 12 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$tentative placement from a 3385 level (1981FrZY) not substantiated. Placement based on high-spin data 
$ EG=1330.9 3, IG=3.1 3 (1970Re03). EG=1330.1 5, IG=2.7 3 (1981FrZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I16} 
EKC$ AVERAGE OF 0.0022 9 (1970Re03) AND 0.0055 6 DEDUCED FROM ICE(K)=63 6 (1962Ya02) AND IG=10.3 5 
$ (462|g)[1040|g][974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.01 8, A4=-0.06 14 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=462.8 2, IG=10.4 5 (1970Re03). EG=462.7 5, IG=9.9 10 (1981FrZY). EG=462.7 5, IG=6.2 10 (1971Do01). EG=465 1, IG=10 1 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (1502|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.02 11, A4=+0.15 19 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=1502.8 2, IG=6.8 7 (1970Re03). EG=1502.9 5, IG=5.9 6 (1981FrZY). EG=1502.8 5, IG=3.0 20 (1971Do01). EG=1503 1, IG=7.6 18 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$1970Re03 resolved doublet 703.6 and 705.8 with I|g=5.9 {I6} and 3.8 {I4}, respectively. Combined E|g and I|g given in other studies: E|g=704.5 {I5}, I|g=8.6 {I9} (1981FrZY); E|g=704.1 {I5}, I|g=7.3 {I15} (1971Do01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ EG=1110.3 2, IG=3.3 3 (1970Re03). EG=1110.4 5, IG=2.9 3 (1981FrZY). EG=1113 1, IG=1.8 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1255|g)[1040|g][974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=-0.07 7, A4=-0.09 12 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=1255.0 2, IG=6.7 7 (1970Re03). EG=1255.4 5, IG=6.7 7 (1981FrZY). EG=1254.8 5, IG=2.5 15 (1971Do01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (2295|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.03 2, A4=-0.4 4 (1970Re03) 
$ EG=2295.3 4, IG=1.92 25 (1970Re03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FrZY). EG=2294 2, IG=2.5 3 (1969Za06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ according to comment in 1995Ch29 this |g is a transition in {+84}Y which is expected to be populated in the reaction studied in 1994Ga15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ according to comment in 1995Ch29 the intensity of this |g ray is much larger than expected and is explained by them as due to contribution from a similar energy transition in {+84}Y which is expected to be populated in the reaction studied in 1994Ga15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.21 {I7} 
E$placement of this |g from 2448 level is considered by the evaluators as suspect. This |g is placed from a 2735-keV level in {+84}Y |e decay and in {+76}Ge({+12}C,4n|g),{+81}Br({+6}Li,3n|g). Another |g at 680.1 is placed from a 3488,(7-) level in the in-beam |g-ray study (1982De05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$ according to e-mail reply of May 31, 2012 from authors, E|g=1422 not 1442 as in earlier version on arXiv webpage 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=288.4. This |g is not used (by compiler) in the fitting procedure 
RI$8.3 {I21} in literature is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$|d=-0.75 {I+52-105} listed in 2017Du08, but |DJ|p implies E2. Perhaps the |d value is for J=3 for 2887 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$LWM average of values from (|a,n|g), IT decay, |e decay (2.68 h), (4.86 h), and ({+13}C,4n|g) 
MR$from |a(K)exp in IT decay. Other: -0.18 {I+9-18} from {+82}Kr(|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E weighted average from (|a,n|g), (p,n|g), IT decay, and |b{++} decay (2.68 h) and (4.86 h). 
RI from intensity balance in IT decay. For |a an uncertainty of 1.4% is assumed. 
M from |a(K)exp/(|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp) in IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+85}Y |e decay (4.86 h). |g also reported in (p,n|g) but the intensity is a factor of 30 larger. |g not reported in any of the other in-beam |g-ray studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$from weighted average of values from ({+13}C,4n|g) and ({+12}C,3n|g). Values in (|a,n|g) are generally much higher at different beam energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M,MR$DCO and pol in ({+13}C,4n|g). |d(M2/E1)=+0.65 {I30} from ({+12}C,3n|g), but |d(M2/E1)|<0.05 from RUL assuming level half-life<20 ns 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A2=+0.28 6, A4=0 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1981Bu02) 
RI$7 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 6 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.57 6, A4=+0.08 5 
$A{-2}=-0.77 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I6} (1981Bu02) 
RI$13 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 11 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.28 5, A4=+0.01 5 
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1981Bu02) 
RI$14 at E({+12}C)=40, 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A2=+0.20 8, A4=-0.10 10 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=0 (1981Bu02) 
RI$23 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 24 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A2=+0.21 4, A4=-0.14 6 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3} (1981Bu02) 
RI$29 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 32 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A2=+0.22 4, A4=-0.09 4 
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I2} (1981Bu02) 
RI$40 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 47 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$454|g (I|g=11, 17) placed from a 3967 level in 1988ZhZV 
$A{-2}=-0.58 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I4} (1981Bu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$494|g (I|g=3) placed from a 2862 level in 1988ZhZU. Note that ordering of 454-167 cascade is reversed in other studies 
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=0 (1981Bu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.23 6, A4=-0.07 10 
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7} (1981Bu02) 
RI$ 7 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 10 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.32 7, A4=+0.02 8 
$A{-2}=-0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I4} (1981Bu02) 
RI$14 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 21 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A2=+0.25 8, A4=-0.08 5 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1981Bu02) 
RI$11 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 14 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$526|g (I|g=6, 12) placed from a 4493 level in 1988ZhZU 
$A{-2}=-0.77 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I13} (1981Bu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.39 6, A4=+0.04 6 
$A{-2}=-0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=0 (1981Bu02) 
RI$12 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 17 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.22 4, A4=-0.06 8 
$A{-2}=-0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1981Bu02) 
RI$7 at E({+12}C)=40 MeV, 10 at 46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$312|g (I|g=5,4) placed from a 3385 level in 1988ZhZU 
$A{-2}=-0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1981Bu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$5 at E({+12}C)=46 MeV (1988ZhZW) 
$Note that a 600|g is placed from a 3981 level in (|a,3n|g) (1977Ar04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.05 {I7} from gate on 1288.8|g, 0.61 {I4} from gate on 264.9|g, 1.90 {I13} for gate on 368.4|g 
$POL=+0.081 {I6} from gate on 679.7|g, +0.073 {I5} from gate on 264.9|g, +0.072 {I7} from gate on 368.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=+0.37 {I6} from gate on 264.9|g consistent with |DJ=1, dipole 
$POL=+0.09 {I5} from gates on 264.9|g and 368.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.25 {I9} from gate on 1111.6|g, 2.5 {I3} from gate on 454.2|g 
$POL=+0.0744 {I16} 
M$|DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.08 {I7} from gate on 368.5|g, 0.396 {I22} from gate on 264.9|g 
$POL=+0.099 {I29} from gates on 368.5|g and 265.4|g 
$In e-mail reply of Feb 6, 2012 from S. Kumar, POL should be positive sign instead of negative in Feb 2 document 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.49 {I12} from gate on 1111.6|g, 2.51 {I19} from gate on 368.5|g 
$In e-mail reply of Feb 6, 2012 from S. Kumar, DCO should be 1.49 {I12} rather than 1.19 {I8} in Feb 2 document 
$POL=+0.180 {I17} from gate on 1111.6|g, +0.180 {I15} from gate on 368.5|g, +0.18 {I4} from gate on 444.0|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.96 {I7} from gate on 1111.6|g, 0.85 {I6} from gate on 679.9|g, 1.97 {I14} from gate on 454.2|g 
$POL=+0.078 {I14} from gate on 368.5|g, +0.079 {I5} from gate on 264.9|g, +0.075 {I11} from gate on 679.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.99 {I12} from gate on 368.4|g, 0.76 {I5} from gate on 264.9|g 
$POL=+0.171 {I13} 
M$|DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.51 {I4} from gate on 1111.6|g 
$POL=+0.090 {I12} from gate on 368.5|g, +0.089 {I12} from gate on 1288.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.56 {I5} from gate on 1111.6|g 
$POL=-0.078 {I32} from gate on 454.2|g, -0.079 {I28} from gate on 1288.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO from Feb 6 reply. Other DCO are: 1.02 {I18}, 2.4 {I4}, suggest mixed M1+E2. Mult=Q in 2012KuZX seems incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.84 {I7} from gate on 679.9|g, 3.3 {I4} from gate on 454.2|g 
$POL=+0.160 {I21} 
M$|DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.49 {I3} from gate on 1111.6|g 
$POL=-0.046 {I9} from gate on 1288.8|g, -0.043 {I7} from gate on 1111.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.48 {I3} from gate on 1111.6|g 
$POL=-0.039 {I9} from gate on 1111.6|g, -0.039 {I11} from gate on 454.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=0 
$A2=+0.10 4, A4=-0.01 4, ^POL=-0.28 4 (1980Ek03) AT EA=18 MEV 
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5}, POL=-0.20 {I3} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3}, POL=+0.63 {I6} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 
$A2=+0.34 2, A4=-0.12 2, ^POL=+0.55 4 (1980Ek03) AT EA=18 MEV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$17.5 at E|a=21 MeV 
RI$50.0 20 AT EA=14 MEV (1980Ek03) 
$A{-2}=-0.60 {I4}, A{-4}=0 
$A{-2}=-0.90 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I2}, POL=+0.21 {I6} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.66 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3}, POL=-0.44 {I13} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 
RI$24.0 9 AT EA=14 MEV (1980Ek03) 
$Branching ratio: I|g(1030)/I|g(1262)=77.4 {I12}/22.6 {I12} (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Ek03 only. 
RI$from I|g(1262|g)/I|g(1030|g)=7.0 {I4}/24.0 {I9} (1980Ek03) 
$A{-2}=-0.45 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 
RI$7.0 4 AT EA=14 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.67 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4}, POL=+0.22 {I27} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 
RI$14.0 7 AT EA=14 MEV (1980Ek03) 
$Branching ratio: I|g(1395)/I|g(1627)=62 {I3}/38 {I3} (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Ek03 
RI$from I|g(1627|g)/I|g(1395|g)=8.7 {I9}/14.0 {I7} (1980Ek03) 
RI$8.7 9 AT EA=14 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$7.0 at E|a=21 MeV 
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I4} 
$A2=+0.43 4, A4=-0.11 4 (1980Ek03) AT EA=14 MEV 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I3}, POL=+0.66 {I21} (1980Ek03) at E|a=18 MeV 
$Branching ratio: I|g(1426)/I|g(1658)=33.6 {I13}/66.4 {I13} (1980Ek03) 
RI$11.0 5 AT EA=14 MEV; 9.2 4 AT EA=18 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$17.7 at E|a=21 MeV 
$A{-2}=-0.57 {I7}, A{-4}=0 
$A{-2}=-0.93 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I6}, POL=+0.52 {I17} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 
$A2=-0.73 3, A4=+0.12 3, ^POL=+0.08 12 (1980Ek03) AT EA=18 MEV 
RI$22.0 9 AT EA=14 MEV, 17.9 7 AT EA=18 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI unresolved from (|a,2n) line. 
$A2|?+0.6 (1977Ar04) 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}, POL=-0.76 {I11} (1980Ek03) at E|a=18 MeV 
RI$AP 19.0 AT EA=14 MEV, 23.3 9 AT EA=18 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$32.7 at E|a=21 MeV 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4}, POL=+0.57 {I6} (1980Ek03) at E|a=14 MeV 
$A2=+0.28 3, A4=-0.10 4 (1980Ek03) AT EA=18 MEV 
RI$12.0 5 AT EA=14 MEV, 28.0 11 AT EA=18 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$28.0 at E|a=21 MeV 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I2}, POL=+0.63 {I13} (1980Ek03) at E|a=18 MeV 
RI$17.1 7 AT EA=18 MEV (1980Ek03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$from {+86}Y |e decay (14.74 h). In in-beam |g-ray data, branching ratio of 11.0 {I10} in (|a,2n|g) (1983Fi05) and 22.1 {I8} in ({+9}Be,5n|g) are high by a factor of 2 to 4 as compared to that in decay data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$[M2+E3] in {+82}Se({+9}Be,5n|g) from DCO (2014Li25) seems unlikely in view of short half-life of 3055.87 level 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.012 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement of 503.0|g to 2+ level in {+86}Y |e decay (14.74 h) is highly questionable as its implied M4 multipolarity is inconsistent with short half-life of 3291 level. Also this |g ray has not been confirmed in (|a,2n|g) (1983Fi05), ({+9}Be,5n|g) (2014Li25) and ({+13}C,3n|g) (2014KuZZ) experiments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1077.1 {I7} (1967Pi03), 1075.3 {I12} (1965Ma09), 1077.2 {I5} (1963Ha41). 
RI$1991Mi04: measured I|g, disintegration rate following |b-decay of {+86}Rb. Deduced |g emission probability for 1077 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ICE(K)=59 5 
$(777|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.065 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (1984Ak02) 
$(777G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=+0.040 23, A4=+0.02 4 (1970Ar03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|d(M3/E2)=-0.008 {I13} from |g|g(|q) 
$ICE(K)=32 2 
$(1153|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.089 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1984Ak02) 
$(1153G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=+0.107 13, A4=+0.006 20 (1970Ar03) 
$(1153G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=+0.093 13, A4=+0.154 24 (1965Va02) 
$(1153G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=+0.097 17, A4=+0.005 40 (1962Ya01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$ICE(K)=56 3 
$(628|g)(1854|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.123 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1} (1984Ak02) 
$(628G)(777G)(THETA): A2=-0.129 5, A4=-0.041 9 (1984Ak02) 
$(628|g)(777|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.049 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I20} (1984Ak02) 
$(628G)(777G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=-0.004 24, A4=+0.04 4 (1970Ar03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$ICE(K)=61 3 
$(443|g)(1153|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.017 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I16} (1984Ak02) 
$(443|g)(1153|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.016 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I22} (1984Ak02) 
$(443G)(1153G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=-0.012 18, A4=-0.005 29 (1970Ar03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$ICE(K)=4.2 8 
$(1921|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.120 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} (1984Ak02) 
$(1921G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=+0.041 8, A4=+0.019 20 (1975Be59) 
$(1921G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=-0.01 3, A4=-0.05 5 (1970Ar03) 
$(1921G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=-0.073 11, A4=+0.005 21 (1965Va02) 
$(1921G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=-0.074 13, A4=+0.05 3 (1962Ya01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$ICE(K)=3 1 
$(826|g)(1153|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.060 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I27} (1984Ak02) 
$(826|g)(1153|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.066 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} (1984Ak02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ICE(K)=43 2 
MR$or -2.4 {I3} 
$(703|g)(628|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.088 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I9} (1984Ak02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$evaluators treat the placement of this |g as highly questionable since it is not confirmed in (|a,2n|g) (1983Fi05), ({+9}Be,5n|g) (2014Li25) and ({+13}C,3n|g) (2014KuZZ) experiments; and due to implied and unlikely M4 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$(645G)(443G)(THETA): A2=+0.146 10, A4=-0.021 17 (1984Ak02) 
$(645|g)(443)(1153|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.103 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I33} (1984Ak02) 
MR$+0.27 {I6} or -1.2 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$(2568|g)(1077|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1984Ak02) 
$(2568G)(1077G)(THETA): A2=+0.065 9, A4=+0.002 10 (1975Be59) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.08 {I2} (1971Is04); in delayed |g-ray spectra, transition intensity of 99|g is the same as those of 627, 1154, and 1078 |g rays in the cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty increased from 0.03 to 0.30 by evaluators 
$DCO=1.2 {I3}; gate on 476.2|g, |DJ=1,dipole. POL=-0.063 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty increased from 0.03 to 0.30 by evaluators 
$DCO=1.36 {I22}; gate on 476.2|g, |DJ=1,dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.06 {I11}; gate on 1553.0|g, |DJ=2,quadrupole. POL=+0.11 {I33}. Note misprint in footnote h in Table 1 of 2016Ku17: multipolarity of 1553.0-keV transition should be (Q) not (D) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$listed as (D) by 2016Ku17, however, this disagrees with |DJ of 2 from their proposed spin assignments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty increased from 0.03 to 0.30 by compiler 
$DCO=1.36 {I22}; gate on 476.2|g, |DJ=1,dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ There is a possibility for a second placement from the 6074 level, but the evaluators are adopting the placement suggested by 1986Wi16 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
B(M1) calculated assuming a small mixing ratio as the known mixing ratios for transitions for isotope seem to be consistently small at less then 0.5 (absolute) with with one exception for the 2235|g from the 2235 keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ There is a possibility for a second placement from the 4863 keV level, but the evaluators are adopting the placement suggested by 1986Wi16 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M From |a(exp) 
E from 1988Al01 as measured in {+87}Y (80 h) |e+|b+ decay. 
EKC weighted average of 0.180 {I15} (1961Hu12), 0.16 {I2} (1970Ca17), 0.162 {I10} (1970Kl02), 0.177 {I6} (1970Le07), and 0.19 {I1} (1971Vo06). K/L from 1966Sa16; other 7.5 (1963Gr41). 
ECC from average of 0.212 {I3} (1968Go30) and 0.211 {I6} (1970Le07). 
RI from I{-|g}(1+|a)=100 and |a=0.213 {I 3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 108.7 {I11} (1969Zo04), 110.0 {I5} (1984Pr01), and 108.8 {I5} (1988Al01); average gives a reduced-|h{+2}=1.62 and the external uncertainty has been adopted. This is the measured value at secular equilibrium, which is 0.966 times the value that would be observed if the 388 level had an insignificant half-life. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.106 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.005 {I21} 
Pol=+0.25 {I5} 
M$M2 exceeds RUL by 1 to 2 |s. Using the minimum |d and maximum T{-1/2}, B(M2)(W.u.)>12, while the maximum |d and minimum T{-1/2} yields B(M2)(W.u.)<575. The RUL limit is 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Not reported by 1981Ek01. From I|g(235|g)/I|g(1091|g)=0.067 in 1975Ar06 
A{-2}=-0.29 {I11}, A{-4}=0 (1975Ar06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The authors' uncertainty of 0.01 keV is likely a typo as none of the other transitions have such a small uncertainty. Evaluators increased to 0.10 keV based on the uncertainties of nearby transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$The authors did not assign a multipolarity based on this work, but used that from 1975Ar06 and 1981Ek01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) and |g(|q)(lin pol) in (|g,|g'); |a(K)exp in {+88}Y |e decay. 
E$from {+88}Y |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) and |a(K)exp in {+88}Y |e decay. 
E$from {+88}Y |e decay. 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.002 {I9} from {+88}Y |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+88}Rb |b{+-} decay, |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+88}Rb |b{+-} decay. Other: +0.01 {I3} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g), E=thermal 
M$Q from |g(|q) in {+80}Se({+11}B,p2n|g), M2 excluded by comparison to RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$|d(M2/E2)=+0.5 {I+5-2} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) results in M2 transition strength which exceeds RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$D from |g(|q) in {+80}Se({+11}B,p2n|g), D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g), |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) measured in {+88}Rb |b{+-} decay. Parity from adopted |D|p. Other: -0.06 {I+7-6} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D from comparison to RUL, |D|p=no from level scheme. 
E,RI$from {+88}Rb |b{+-} decay. 
RI$Other: 85.9 {I9} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: <60 for multiply placed transition in (n,|g), E=thermal 
M$D from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g), |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement is questionable, if J|p=(4+) assignment to 5092 level is correct, as this transition would imply M3 multipolarity. 
E$observed only in (n,|g), E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only in (n,|g), E=thermal. Tentative placement as transition would imply M3/E4 multipolarity if J|p=(3-) for 5424.61 level is correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only in (n,|g), E=thermal. Tentative placement as transition would imply M2 or E3 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement is questionable, if J|p=(4+) assignment to 5835.58 level is correct, as this transition would imply M3 multipolarity. 
E$observed only in (n,|g), E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only in (n,|g), E=thermal 
E$tentative as placement would require M2+E3 multipolarity for the transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only in (n,|g), E=thermal 
E$tentative as placement would require M3+E4 multipolarity for the transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentative placement as transition would imply E3/M4 multipolarity if J|p=3+ for 6257.85 level is correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$Other: <0.03 (1969He16) 
RI$weighted average of 14.68 % {I13} (2002Mi07) and 14.24 % {I10} (2003Su38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(exp), |a(K)exp from 1971Al06. |a(K)exp/|a(L+...)exp=7.8 {i3} (1971Al06). 
$Internal pair creation coefficient 0.00023 {i3} (1971Al06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
ECC$Weighted average of 0.00028 {I3} (1971Al06) and 0.000345 {I24} (1966Ha07). 
EKC$Weighted average of 0.00025 {I3} (1971Al06), 0.000301 {I21} (1966Ha07) and 0.00034 {I7} (1952Me50). 
$|a(K)exp/|a(L+...)exp=7.0 {i5} (1966Ha07), 8.0 {i2} (1971Al06). K/L(E1)=9.3 
$ce(K)/(|g+ce)(exp)=0.874 {i15} (1966Ha07). 
M$from |a(K)exp. 
MR$from weighted average of A{-2} and A{-4} values measured by |g|g(|q) in 1973He22, 1968Ha36, 1968Lu13, and 1953St25. 
RI$Others: 92.0 {I7} (1974Ar12), 94.9 {I5} (1973Sc40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=0.71 {I7} (gated on 850.4, |DJ=2 Q transition) 
$R(DCO)=1.06 {I8} (gated on 936.4, |DJ=1, D transition) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=100 
M$A{-2}=+0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I5} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.274 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.069 {I8} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.08 {I9} 
M$A{-2}=-0.10 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I7} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.02 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.04 {I22} 
M$A{-2}=+0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.196 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I12} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.73 {I8} 
M$A{-2}=+0.30 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I12} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.275 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.049 {I23} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.10 {I3} 
E$Observed only by 2008Go25 in this placement. 1993BaYX report an unplaced 1650.2|g, however, the F(|t) is significantly different from that of the 3485.9|g to suggest the 1650|g is not a transition from the 3487 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.43 {I19} 
M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.103 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.015 {I12} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.53 {I10} 
M$A{-2}=+0.43 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I11} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.268 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.141 {I24} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.18 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I10} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.12 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I10} (1993BaYX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.67 {I20} 
M$A{-2}=-0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.279 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.014 (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.86 {I8} 
M$A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (2008Go25). 
MR$+0.20 {I10} or +1.5 {I+3-2} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.63 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=+0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I6} (2008Go25). 
MR$-0.36 {I6} or +1.6 {I2} was derived by 2008Go25 assuming J=5 for the 4171-keV level, whereas adopted J=3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.02 {I5} 
M$A{-2}=-0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.75 {I4} 
M$A{-2}=+0.37 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I13} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.36 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I13} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.81 {I4} 
M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.68 {I12} 
M$A{-2}=+0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.23 {I2} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.36 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I10} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2008Go25 observe a 768.36 {I15} transition with I|g=0.28 {I2} which is unplaced in {+88}Sr and also belongs to {+86}Sr. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.28 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.24 {I13} (2008Go25). 
MR$-1.5 {I+9-90} was derived by 2008Go25 assuming J=2 for the 4354-keV level, whereas adopted J=(3) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.78 {I4} 
M$A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.50 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=+0.24 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I9} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.41 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I9} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.58 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=-0.78 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I15} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.81 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10} (2008Go25). 
MR$-0.8 {I+3-4} is derived by 2008Go25 on the basis of |g(|q) data. Adopted J|ps indicate this is an E1(+M2) transition. Such a large value of |d would result in an M2 strength greater than the RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.31 {I2} 
E$from 2008Go25. A 936.7 {I1} transition was observed by 1993BaYX but not placed in the level scheme. 
M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I10} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.54 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=+0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I5} (1993BaYX). 
M$other: D from A{-2}=+0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I6} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.39 {I2} 
RI$given as 16.9 {I4} in Table 5 of 1993BaYX. Corrected by the evaluators so that |SI|g out of the level =100 
M$A{-2}=-0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7} (2008Go25). 
MR$calculated assuming J=3 for the 4641-keV level (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.34 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=-0.25 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I11} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.21 {I2} 
M$A{-2}=+0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I4} (1993BaYX) 
M$other: D from A{-2}=-0.17 {I9} (2008Go25); this is in disagreement with |DJ=2 for the transition from the Adopted J|ps. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.30 {I2} 
M$A{-2}=+0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I3} (1993BaYX); A{-2}=+0.38 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I14} (2008Go25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.34 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I6} (2008Go25). 
MR$-0.50 {I10} or >10 assuming J=2 for 4924-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.21 {ILT} 
TI$includes a contribution from {+86}Sr 
M$A{-2}=-0.71 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I20} (1993BaYX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$2008Go25 report an unplaced transition with E|g=1501.6 {I1} and I|g=0.19 {I3}. 
M$A{-2}=-0.55 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1993BaYX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g appears in Table 5 of 1993BaYX, but is not in Fig. 19 and inconsistent with the proposed 2,3,4 spin for this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.28 {I2} 
E$from 2008Go25, not observed in 1993BaYX. Considered questionable as placement would require M3 or E4 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$misplaced if J=4+ assignment to level is correct which would require M4 or E5 multipolarity for the transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$ branching ratios are from ({+11}B,p3n|g). In (|a,n|g), I|g(1593)/I|g(284)=3.2, but 284|g in this reaction is unresolved. 
M$ M1+E2, |d=+0.30 {I3} from |g(|q,pol) data in (|a,n|g). E2 required by 15/2- assignment proposed in ({+11}B,p3n|g) (2001St14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=-0.57 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4}. However, POL=+0.88 {I20} is in disagreement. |d=-0.24 {I6} and A{-2}, A{-4} values predict POL=-0.06. 1457|g could be contributed by a contaminant also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I3}, POL=+0.12 {I24} 
MR$0.00 {I5} or |d=+4.1 {I+23-11} for J|p=9/2+ and |d=0 for J|p=9/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.43 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}, POL=-0.72 {I24} 
MR$0 for J|p=11/2+ and |d=+0.43 {I8} for J|p=13/2-. The yield function favors J|p=11/2+ for this state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, POL=-0.34 {I27} 
M$ M1+E2, |d=+0.30 {I3} proposed by 1981Wa10 based on |g(|q) and polarization data, but this assignment is inconsistent with E2 required by adopted spin-parity assignment. While |g(|q) would be consistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition, negative value of polarization coefficient points towards M1 rather than E2 transition. With large uncertainty for polarization coefficient, it is possible that M1 assignment is insecure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q from |g(|q) in {+82}Se({+11}B,p2n|g),{+12}C({+86}Kr,2|a|g) and |g|g(|q) in {+90}Kr |b{+-} decay; M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
M,MR$(1375|g)(831|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.089 {I13}, A{-4}=0.051 {I15} (1981Ta05), |d is for J=3 for 2207 level. 
MR$other: +0.464 {I21} for J=2 (1981Ta05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1665|g)(831|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1981Ta05) 
MR$+0.53 {I18-11} for J=3 or +0.03 {I4} for J=2 (1981Ta05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1738|g)(831|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I7}, A{-4}=0.11 {I8} (1981Ta05) 
MR$-0.12 {I12} for J(2570)=3 or +0.64 {I18} for J(2570)=2 or -0.06 {I8} for J(2570)=1 (1981Ta05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$(3304|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.169 {I35}, A{-4}=0.01 {I7} 
MR$-0.07 {I3} for J(4135)=1 and 0.60 {I8} for J(4135)=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$(3572.8|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.239 {I66}, A{-4}=0.24 {I15} 
MR$-2.3 {I5} for J(4405)=2 and 0.6 {I2} for J(4405)=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M D |DJ=1 from ({+36}S,F|g); possibly E1, analogous to {+89}Sr (2013Hw01). However, 2002St06 suggested M1 instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp: weighted average of 1.10 {I9} (1975Wo05) and 1.05 {I10} (1974Ac01). The datum from 1975Wo05 is the unweighted average of 1.19 {I6} from I(ce(K))/I|g and 1.01 {I7} from I(K| x ray)/I|g. 
K/(L+M+)=5.38 {I21} (1970Ma07). 
MR from |a(K)exp; |d>1.1 from K/L. |d=0.8 {I+5-2} from K/(L+M+) is inconsistent with |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.94 {I25} (D gated); DCO=0.39 {I19} (Q gated). |D|p=yes proposed by 2013Hw01 by analogy with {+89}Sr. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 814.4 in {+208}Pb({+18}O,Fxn|g). 
M Q |DJ=2 from |g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm SF decay; not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Q from DCO ratio in {+159}Tb({+36}S,Fxn|g); partial T{-1/2}<5 ns because seen in prompt coin in {+248}Cm SF decay, so not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E for contaminated line; 792.8 from {+248}Cm SF decay also. |g is placed differently in {+208}Pb({+18}O,Fxn|g) (feeding a 3786 level), implying a 4579 level which has not been adopted by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 1020.2 {I5} in {+159}Tb({+36}S,Fxn|g), but may be a doublet in that reaction; 1020.8 in {+248}Cm SF decay. 
RI from {+159}Tb({+36}S,Fxn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.56 {I15}, Q 858|g in gate; consistent with pure stretched D for 1092|g and stretched Q for 858|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E contaminated by a 1345|g of unknown origin. 
M DCO=1.0 {I4}, Q 858|g in gate; however, result may be unreliable due to contamination of this transition by an impurity |g. Interpreted by authors as |DJ=0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E contaminated by a {+191}Tl line. 
M DCO=1.5 {I5} for |DJ=1 1092|g in gate; may be unreliable due to {+191}Tl contamination of |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI possibly an unresolved doublet, so I|g may be overestimated. 
M DCO=1.0 {I3} for |DJ=1 1092|g in gate; may be unreliable due to complex nature of |g. Interpreted by authors as |DJ=2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Q |DJ=2 from (1371|g)(815|g)(|q); not M2 from RUL because |g observed in prompt coin (partial T{-1/2}<5 ns). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$(581|g)(1371|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=0.05 {I13} 
M$(1371|g)(815|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.179 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.037 {I32} 
$|d=0.15 {I6} for J(2186)=2, 0.35 {I5} or 1.7 {I2} for J(2186)=3. 
$|d=-0.10 {I17} or -2.8 {I11} both for J(2186)=3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$(1093|g)(sum|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I6} 
MR$0.54 {I8} for J(2767)=4, 0.11 {I4} or 5.2 {I12} for J(2767)=5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g absent in {+252}Cf SF decay even though it should have been strong enough to have been detected in that experiment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 213.433 {I12} (1979Bo26), 213.39 {I5} (1977Bi01), 213.39 {I5} (1974Ac04). 
|d(M1,E2)>2.4 from adopted |a(K)exp. 
|a(K)exp: from 1986Ka20. Others: 0.038 {I8} (1974Ac04), 0.04 {I1} (1972Mc04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 432.633 {I23} (1979Bo26), 432.51 {I5} (1977Bi01), 432.62 {I5} (1974Ac04). 
I|g=20.2% {I12} based on recommended decay scheme normalization (cf. 13.2% {I8} from I(432|g)/I{-n} in {+94}Rb |b{+-}n decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp deduced from I(ce) using the 837 transition as calibration standard. The value is in accordance with M1 or E2 multipolarity. The |g|g data from the {+252}Cf SF decay dataset indicate an E2 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$|g|g(|q) analyzed assuming J(2604)=(4), J(1926)=(3). |d=-0.54 {I+15-31} or |d=-2.5 {I+10-14} from 678-1090 cascade assuming 1090|g is pure E1. -0.71<|d<+1.81 from 678-(1090 unobserved)-837 cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$|g|g(|q) analyzed assuming J(2650)=(3), J(2146)=(4). |d=-0.55 {I+17-30} or |d=-3.1 {I+20-25} from 504-1309 cascade assuming 1309|g is pure E2. |d=-0.35 {I+9-7} or |d=-7 {I+2-5} from 504-(1309 unobserved)-837 cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$+0.29 {I+7-6} if J(2704 level)=2; +0.13 {i6} if J=3. |d=0 if J=4 also possible within two standard deviations. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This gamma from an (8+) feeds the 2971.1 level, which in turn feeds the 2145, 4+ level, implying that J|p(2971.1)=6+, at an energy lower than the 6+ belonging to the g.s. cascade. As a consequence, this transition is considered highly questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This gamma from an (8+) feeds the 2773 level, which in turn feeds the 2603, (4-) level. This would imply that either the 130.2 |g or the 1189.4 |g will have a rare E3 or M2 character, as a result we consider this gamma questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GE
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) deduced by compiler. 2017Re05 give B(E2)>0.008, where |g-ray branching ratio has not been considered, as confirmed in email communication with first author (June 7, 2017). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,M$from {+94}Sr Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (March 2011 update). 
$B(E2) is in e{+2}b{+2} units, Statistical uncertainty is dominant. Systematic uncertainty is stated by 2017Ch28 as 0.0002. B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler using lifetime in the present work. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp 
E$weighted average of 352.0 {I1} ({+95}Rb |b{+-} decay), 352.0 {I3} ({+252}Cf SF decay), 352.1 {I4} ({+235}U(n,F|g), {+239}Pu(n,F|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$E2 from |a(K)exp. in |b{+-} decay 
E$weighted average of 204.0 {I1} ({+95}Rb |b{+-} decay), 204.0 {I3} ({+252}Cf SF decay), 204.2 {I4} ({+235}U(n,F|g), {+239}Pu(n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from the J|p of initial and final levels. 
E$weighted average of 682.8 {I4} ({+95}Rb |b{+-} decay), 682.4 {I3} ({+252}Cf SF decay) 
RI$from {+95}Rb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+95}Rb |b{+-} decay; not observed in {+96}Rb |b{+-}n decay 
M$from |a(K)exp in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1 from |a(K)exp 
%IG$Affiliation method; Ge(Li). Others: 47.5% {i21} (revised by evaluator from 57% {i4} (1983Kr11. %I|g({+95}Y 954|g)=19 {i2}; %|b{+-}n({+95}Rb)=8.6 {i5}) using current values) and 46% (1989WaZV. Ge(Li); assuming independent fission yields of 1988Wa12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$transition highly converted since no corresponding |g was seen. T{-1/2}=6.7 ns excludes high mult. 
$|r=0.43 {i5} (1980JuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 24 {I3} ({+96}Rb |b{+-} decay), 22 {I4} ({+238}U(|a,F|g)) and 42 {I8} ({+248}Cm SF decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 70 {I6} ({+96}Rb |b{+-} decay), 50 {I3} ({+238}U(|a,F|g)) and 67 {I8} ({+248}Cm SF decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$transition highly converted since no corresponding |g was seen. T{-1/2}=6.7 ns excludes high mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=1.16 {I6} 
A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2}, POL=-0.3 {I2} 
$ (|g|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, POL=+0.15 {I9}; correlating |g rays: 814.8, 977.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
DCO=1.14 {I5} 
$ A{-2}=-0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2}. POL=-0.3 {I2} 
$ (|g|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2}; POL=+0.28 {I12} (2009Rz01); correlating |g rays: 491.0, 659.3, 673.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2) value deduced by compiler from E2 matrix element in 2016Cl03 
RI$for {+120}Sn target in 103.8|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range (2016Cl03). Values at other angles: 350 {I20} for {+109}Ag target in 37.5|'-139.9|' range, 240 {I30} for {+120}Sn target in 71.0|'-103.8|' (c.m.) range, 167 {I15} for {+120}Sn target in 35.9|'-71.0|' (c.m.) range (2016Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Weak |g ray claimed to be observed, at the detection limit, only at high c.m. angles (2016Cl03,2016Cl01) 
RI$for {+120}Sn target in 103.8|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range (2016Cl03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GE
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) deduced by compiler. 2017Re05 give B(E2)>0.049, where |g-ray branching ratio has not been considered, as confirmed by first author of 2017Re05 in email communication of June 7, 2017 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$(692|g)(469|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.128 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.060 {I37} 
M$(692|g)(815|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.246 {I17}, A{-4}=0.173 {I34} 
MR$0.77 {I15} or 3.4 {I11} or 0.87 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$(659|g)(674|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.113 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I33} 
M$(659|g)(491|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.098 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.049 {I29} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
%IG$using the calculated normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I5} (1983Kr11); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.00162, |a(K)(E2)=0.00204 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
%IG$using the calculated normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0021 {I8} (1983Kr11); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00190, |a(K)(M1)=0.00152 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.50 {I6} (weighted average of |a(K)exp=0.53 {I15} and 0.53 {I12} (1990Lh02) and |a(K)exp=0.48 {I8} (1983Kr11)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=1 d for 167.1|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 141.0|g from 167.1|g-141.0|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=1 d for 519.9|g and sum of |DJ=2 Q, E2 transitions (probably 305.3|g+442.9|g) from 519.9|g-sum ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 687.0|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 305.3|g from 687.0|g-305.3|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from |a(exp) for 57.6|g; compatible with D(+Q) for 57.6|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 223.8|g from 57.6|g-223.8|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 126.6|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 223.8|g from 126.6|g-223.8|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 237.5|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 375.5|g from 237.5|g-375.5|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 388.4|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 223.8|g from 388.4|g-233.8|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 442.9|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 305.3|g from 442.9|g-305.3|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 509.7|g and |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 375.5|g from 509.7|g-375.5|g ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 522.8|g and sum of |DJ=2 Q, E2 transitions (probably 233.8|g+388.4|g) from 522.8|g-sum ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 575.1|g and sum of |DJ=2 Q, E2 transitions (probably 305.3|g+442.9|g) from 575.1|g-sum ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compatible with |DJ=2 Q, E2 for 653.5|g and sum of |DJ=2 Q, E2 transitions (probably 233.8|g+388.4|g) from 575.1|g-sum ang correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$522.7 from 1980MoZJ 
E$|DE adopted by evaluator by similarity to the other |g's in the |n9/2[404] isomer band 
M$depending on J|p assignment of 830 level, this transition can be either [M2] (11/2-), or [M1+E2] (9/2+). Both hypotheses are supported by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cm SF decay (2019Ur01). Others: 144.5 {I1} (2002Lh01), 144.4 {I2} (1977Wo07), 144.2 (1987Ma58), 144.5 (1984Be50), 144.7 (1979Pe17), 144.6 (1980Sc13), 144.224 {I6} (1979Bo26, curved crystal) from {+98}Rb decay (96 ms); 144.6 {I3} (1982Kr11, {+100}Rb |b{+-}2n decay); 144.9 (2004Li66) and 144.3 (1997Ha64) from {+252}Cf SF decay. Value from 197Bo26 is the most precise but seemingly discrepant, in view of higher values by |?0.4-0.5 keV in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cm SF decay (2019Ur01). Others: 289.3 {I1} (2002Lh01) 289.2 {I2} (1977Wo07) in {+98}Rb decay (96 ms) are in agreement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cm SF decay (2019Ur01). 
M$|g|g(|q) in {+252}Cf SF decay (2019Ur01) (see data in {+248}Cm SF), and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. This transition is considered in GOSIA analysis by 2016Cl01 
RI$deduced from B(E2) values in Coulomb excitation (by evaluators). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cm SF decay 
MR$deduced by 2016Cl03 from B(E2) and B(M1) matrix elements, sign is unknown. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 3.9 {I13} from {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (96 ms) and 6 {I3} from {+252}Cf SF decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cm SF decay 
M$|g|g(|q) in {+252}Cf SF decay (2019Ur01) (see data in {+248}Cm SF), and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cf SF decay (2019Ur01). Others: 812.5 (1996Sm04), 810.0 (2001Ur01) in {+248}Cm SF decay; 805.6 (2004Li66) in {+252}Cf SF decay. The spread in the available E|g values make the precise energy of this transition uncertain. This may be the reason 2019Ur01, in Fig. 2 of their paper place E|g value and the corresponding level energy in parentheses. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 144.4 {I2} (1977Wo07), 144.2 (1987Ma58), 144.5 (1984Be50), 144.7 (1979Pe17), 144.6 (1980Sc13), 144.224 {I6} (1979Bo26, curved-crystal data). Value from 1979Bo26 is the most precise, but seems discrepant, in view of several other values which point to a higher energy by about 0.4-0.5 keV, as for example 144.70 {I5} in 2019Ur01 from prompt |g rays in {+248}Cm SF decay 
M$ce(K)/ce(L)+=6.0 {i4} (1980Sc13) 
RI$from total I|g=100 for combined source (2002Lh01) and I|g|?20 for {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (115 ms) deduced by evaluators. Others: 100 in 1977Wo07, 1979Pe17, 1980Sc13 for combined source 
$I|g(per 100 decays of {+98}Rb)=34 {I3} (1987Ma58). Other: 51 {I2} (1982Kr11,1980JuZY) 
$K- and L-conversion lines detected in coin with 656|g (2016Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 70.8 (1979Pe17), 70.9 (1984Be50), 70.9 (1980Sc13) 
RI$from |g+ce intensity balance with ce(K)(216)/ce(K)(71|g)=1.14 {I3} (1980Sc13), K/L(216, theory)=9.1, |a(K)(71|g)=2.86 {I5} and |a(total)(71|g)=3.55 {I6} (from BrIcc). Others: 3.3 (1979Pe17), 11 (1980Sc13) 
M$ce(K)/ce(L)+=5.3 {I8} (1980Sc13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference 
M$|a(K)exp>100, ce(K)/ce(L)=8.7 {I6} (K/L(theory)=9.1) (1980Sc13), ce(L)/ce(K)=0.14 {I1} (2016Pa03) 
TI$see comments for I(71|g) 
$K- and L-conversion lines detected in coin with 656|g (2016Pa03) 
$Measured I(215,E0)/[I(|g+ce)(71,E2)]=0.72 {I6} (2016Pa03) 
$Deduced |r{+2}(E0)=0.053 {I5} (2016Pa03). Using an alternative method, 2016Pa03 deduce |r{+2}(E0)=0.049 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 289.2 {I2} (1977Wo07), 289.4 (1987Ma58), 289.5 (1984Be50), 289.5 (1979Pe17), 289.4 (1980Sc13) 
RI$others: 34 {I3} (1977Wo07), 28.0 (1979Pe17), 29 (1980Sc13) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.021 {I3} (1980Sc13). (289|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.102 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1984Be50). 
$I|g(per 100 {+98}Rb decays)=13 {i1} (1987Ma58) 
$In table 2, 1984Be50 give 0.010 {i2} which is a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 433.3 (1984Be50), 433.6 (1980Sc13) 
RI$other: 6 (1980Sc13) 
$(433|g)(289|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.35 {I22}, A{-4}=0.0 {I4}; (433|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.0 {I3} (1984Be50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 655.6 {I2} (1977Wo07), 655.9 (1984Be50), 655.8 (1979Pe17), 655.3 (1980Sc13) 
RI$from I|g=8.4 {I8} in 2002Lh01 for combined intensity and I|g<1.7 (deduced by evaluators) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (115 ms). Others: 3.3 (1977Wo07), 10 (1980Sc13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 727.4 (1984Be50), 726.6 (1979Pe17), 726.6 (1980Sc13) 
RI$others: 1.6 (1979Pe17), 0.4 (1980Sc13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 871.5 (1984Be50), 871.3 (1979Pe17), 870.7 (1980Sc13) 
RI$others: 1.6 (1979Pe17), 2.00 (1980Sc13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$others: 1455.1 {I4} (1977Wo07), 1455.6 (1979Pe17), 1455.7 (1984Be50) 
RI$others: 7 {I1} (1977Wo07), 5.7 (1979Pe17) 
MR$from (1456|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.60 {I38} (1984Be50). 1984Be50 quote |d>+3.11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1692.9 {I4} (1977Wo07), 1693.1 (1979Pe17), 1693.3 (1984Be50) 
RI$others: 13 {I2} (1977Wo07), 8.1 (1979Pe17) 
$|d(Q/D)>+1.5 for J(1837.5)=2 from (1693|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.25 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.49 {I28} (1984Be50). 1984Be50 quote |d=+3.32 to +36.73. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 605.5 (1979Pe17), 605.6 (1984Be50) 
RI$others: <1.5 (1979Pe17) 
$(606|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.38 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I34} (1984Be50). 1984Be50 give |d>+2.49, but in evaluator's estimate, it is difficult to get a unique value since |d(1456|g) has a wide range of values 
$Coincidence with 1325|g (1984Be50) unexplained 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$others: 1771.6 (1979Pe17) 
RI$others: 2.4 (1979Pe17) 
MR$+0.05 to +4.5 from (1772|g)(289|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.44 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.27 {I50}. 1984Be50 give |d>6.98 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 630.4 {I3} (1977Wo07), 630.7 (1979Pe17), 631.0 (1984Be50) 
RI$others: 3 {I1} (1977Wo07), 4.9 (1979Pe17) 
$(631|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.33 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I29} (1984Be50). 1984Be50 give |d=+0.86 to +2.29 for J(2231)=1, but in evaluator's opinion it is difficult to get a unique value since |d(1456|g) has a wide range of values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$others: 2171.8 {I6} (1977Wo07), 2171.9 (1979Pe17, placed from a 2606 level), 2171.7 (1984Be50) 
RI$others: 18 {I3} (1977Wo07), 18.7 (1979Pe17) 
MR$+0.5 to +20.0 from (2172|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.27 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.37 {I29}. 1984Be50 give |d=+2.6 to +14.6 
$A{-4} uncertainty=0.02866 in Table 2 of 1984Be50 is a misprint since it is inconsistent with J=0,1,2,3 for 2316 level and so it should be 0.2866 which is consistent with J=2 but not J=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$others: 3008.4 {I10} (1977Wo07), 3009.0 (1979Pe17), 3010.5 (1984Be50) 
RI$others: 3 {I1} (1977Wo07), 4.9 (1979Pe17) 
MR$from (3009|g)(289|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.47 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I36}. 1984Be50 give |d=-3.1 to +11.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(289.4|g)(144.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.092 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.015 {I15}, consistent with 4 |) 2 |) 0 cascade (2019Ur01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(433.3|g)(289.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.101 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.019 {I15}, consistent with 6 |) 4 |) 2 cascade (2019Ur01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(566.3|g)(433.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.121 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.019 {I27}, consistent with 8 |) 6 |) 4 cascade (2019Ur01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(689.5|g)(433.3|g+289.4|g+144.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.090 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.024 {I26}, consistent with 10 |) 8 |) 6 cascade (2019Ur01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+248}Cf SF decay (2019Ur01). Others: 812.5 (1996Sm04), 810.0 (2001Ur01) in {+248}Cm SF decay; 805.6 (2004Li66) in {+252}Cf SF decay. The spread in the available E|g values makes the precise energy of this transition uncertain. This may be the reason 2019Ur01, in Fig. 2 of their paper place E|g value and the corresponding level energy in parentheses. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=144.3, I|g=100 (1997Ha64) 
$Intensity of 145|g=0.0040 transitions/fission of {+254}Cf (1980ChZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from |SI(|g+ce to 144 level)|?25, including uncertain transitions. Note that total I|g=100 for combined source, so I|g|?80 is allocated to 144|g in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (96 ms). 
M$ce(K)/ce(L)+=6.0 {i4} (1980Sc13) 
$K- and L-conversion lines detected in coin with 656|g (2016Pa03) 
$I|g(per 100 decays of {+98}Rb)=34 {I3} (1987Ma58). Other: 51 {I2} (1982Kr11,1980JuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=2.1 {I2} in 2002Lh01 for combined source (96 ms and 115 ms) and I|g=1.18 {I16} (deduced by evaluators) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (96 ms). See comments for I(71|g) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (96 ms) 
M$ce(K)/ce(L)+=5.3 {I8} (1980Sc13) 
$K- and L-conversion lines detected in coin with 656|g (2016Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference 
M$|a(K)exp>100, ce(K)/ce(L)=8.7 {I6} (K/L(theory)=9.1) (1980Sc13), ce(L)/ce(K)=0.14 {I1} (2016Pa03) 
TI$from ce(K)(215)/ce(K)(71|g)=1.14 {I3} (1980Sc13), K/L(theory)=9.1, |a(K)(71|g)=2.86 {I5} and |a(total)(71|g)=3.55 {I6} (from BrIcc), I|g(71|g)=0.9 {I3}. Total intensity=10.0 from 1984Be50 for combined source 
$K- and L-conversion lines detected in coin with 656|g (2016Pa03) 
$Measured I(215,E0)/[I(|g+ce)(71,E2)]=0.72 {I6} (2016Pa03) 
$Deduced |r{+2}(E0)=0.053 {I5} (2016Pa03). Using an alternative method, 2016Pa03 deduce |r{+2}(E0)=0.049 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.5 to +20.0 from (2172|g)(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.27 {i16}, A{-4}=+0.37 {i29}. 1984Be50 give |d=+2.6 to +14.6 
$A{-4} uncertainty=0.02866 in Table 2 of 1984Be50 is a misprint since it is inconsistent with J=0,1,2,3 for 2316 level and so it should be 0.2866 which is consistent with J=2 but not J=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g counts=399E2 {I15} 
$Counts for {+208}Pb target: 38000 {I500} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 38100 {I500} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 4730 {I440} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$Counts for {+60}Ni target: 26700 {I900} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 17700 {I900} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 5700 {I500} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$This |g is not observed in 2016Cl01 but considered in the fitting procedure 
$It is noted in Table I of 2016Cl01 that this transition strength is deduced from half-lives in 2002Lh01 and 1980Sc13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g counts=1082E1 {I14} 
$Other counts for {+208}Pb target: 1410 {I50} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 4680 {I80} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 1390 {I60} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$Counts for {+60}Ni target: 2510 {I100} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 4140 {I80} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 1410 {I50} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g counts=1910 {I50} 
$Other counts for {+208}Pb target: 56 {I13} in 29.2|'-41.9|' (c.m.) range, 380 {I30} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 390 {I20} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$Counts for {+60}Ni target: 200 {I20} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 610 {I30} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 250 {I30} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. This transition is considered in GOSIA analysis by 2016Cl01 
$I|g(438)/I|g(656)=0.042 {I+52-27}, deduced by evaluators from B(E2) values for the respective |g transitions 
$It is noted in Table I of 2016Cl01 that this transition strength is deduced using branching ratio from 2002Lh01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g counts=110 {I30} 
$Other counts for {+208}Pb target: 47 {I9} in 45.2|'-68.1|' (c.m.) range, 29 {I7} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$Counts for {+60}Ni target: 51 {I12} in 54.0|'-69.9|' (c.m.) range, 60 {I10} in 72.7|'-97.5|' (c.m.) range, 24 {I6} in 100.0|'-112.9|' (c.m.) range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$|g counts=42 {I13} 
$Other I|g value for {+208}Pb target: 12 {I5} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$|g not observed for {+60}Ni target. 
MR$deduced by 2016Cl03 from B(E2) and B(M1) matrix elements, sign is unknown. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$It is noted in Table I of 2016Cl01 that this transition strength is deduced using branching ratio from 2002Lh01. 
$From B(E2) values in 2016Cl01, evaluators deduce I|g(871)/I|g(656)=0.25 {I+9-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g counts=140 {I40} 
$Other value of count for {+208}Pb target: 45 {I10} in 132.5|'-139.9|' (c.m.) range 
$|g not observed for {+60}Ni target 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Note that B(E2) value or corresponding matrix element is not given in 2016Cl03 
$This |g is not observed in 2016Cl03 but considered in the fitting procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains B(E2)=0.118 {I+20-21} using the upper and lower limits of lifetime. 
$No internal conversion correction was applied as the nuclei were in their fully stripped charge state, according to e-mail reply of May 17, 2020 from Ryan Llewellyn. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3(+E4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in (HI,xn|g) (2001No07) 
MR$ce data (2001No07) give |d<0.65; RUL=100 for E4 gives |d<0.05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3(+E4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$|a(K)exp gives |d<0.65; but RUL=100 for E4 restricts |d<0.05 
CC M3,E4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10,0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$ DCO=1.6 {I6} (dipole gated). A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} 
M$A{-2} and A{-4} consistent with |DJ=0, dipole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E 113.5 {I1} (1994Jo12) and 113.29 {I3} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 113.4 {I1} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E 149.7 {I1} (1994Jo12), 149.62 {I2} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 149.7 {I1} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E 119.1 {I1} (1994Jo12), 118.87 {I2} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 119.2 {I1} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 268.7 {I1} (1994Jo12), 268.47 {I13} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 268.4 {I3} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
RI unweighted average of 76.0 {I15} (1994Jo12), 49.3 {I15} (1985Li12) in {+58}Ni({+28}Si,|ap|g). Reason for the discrepancy is unknown. 
M Q from DCO ratio; not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E 175.3 {I1} (1994Jo12), 175.39 {I3} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 175.3 {I2} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E 248.6 {I2} (1994Jo12), 248.79 {I7} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 248.3 {I2} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 422.8 {I4} (1994Jo12), 423.50 {I22} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 423.2 {I4} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E 414.9 {I1} (1994Jo12), 414.87 {I12} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 414.0 {I4} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
RI weighted average of 111 {I5} (1994Jo12), 92.3 {I19} (1985Li12) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 533.8 {I2} (1994Jo12), 534.0 {I3} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 532.6 {I5} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 537.5 {I2} (1994Jo12), 537.76 {I15} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 536.3 {I5} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D from DCO ratio; |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 
E 155.9 {I1} (1994Jo12), 155.29 {I2} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 155.7 {I2} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 341.6 {I2} (1994Jo12), 341.93 {I7} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 340.8 {I3} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 630.2 {I2} (1994Jo12), 630.56 {I10} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 629.1 {I6} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E 899.2 {I3} in ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 897.8 {I9} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
M (D) from DCO ratio; |D|p=(yes) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E 643.7 {I2} (1994Jo12), 644.86 {I18} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 642.5 {I6} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E 799.3 {I1} (1994Jo12), 800.30 {I19} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 799.2 {I8} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 363.1 {I2} (1994Jo12), 363.62 {I22} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 362.3 {I4} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
RI unweighted average of 26 {I4} (1994Jo12), 49 {I4} (1985Li12) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 704.3 {I3} (1994Jo12), 704.93 {I13} (1985Li12) both in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 703.1 {I7} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 843.6 {I4} and 844.0 {I3} in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 842.4 {I8} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
M Q intraband |g from ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E 1033.5 {I2} and 1034 {I1} in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1032.8 {I10} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
M Q from DCO ratio; not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E 1208.0 {I6} in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1208.7 {I12} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
RI other: 24 from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E 1227.3 {I2} and 1227 {I3} in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1226.0 {I12} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
M Q from DCO ratio; not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E 1357.1 {I4} and 1360 {I5} in ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1356.0 {I14} in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
M stretched Q from DCO ratio; not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 118.87 {I2} (1985Li12). 
DCO=0.93 {I6} (1994Jo12) datum is inconsistent with |DJ=1. 
67% {I1} branch (1985Li12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other: 268.47 {I13} (1985Li12). 
RI other: 33 {I1} if I|g(119)=67 {I1} (1985Li12) 
M DCO=0.97 {I7} (1994Jo12). Not M2 from RUL. 
33% {I1} branch (1985Li12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 289.09 {I18} (1985Li12) for doublet. 
M DCO=0.91 {I13} (1994Jo12); consistent with a value expected for the |DJ=0 transition indicated by deduced band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
other E|g: 248.79 {I7} (1985Li12). E|g=248.15 in fig. 2 of 1985Li12 is presumed to be erroneous. 
DCO=0.51 {I5} (1994Jo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E other: 414.87 {I12} (1985Li12). 
RI other: 48 {I1} if I|g(533)=52 {I1} (1985Li12) 
DCO=0.59 {I4} (1994Jo12). 
48% {I1} branch (1985Li12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 534.0 {I3} (1985Li12). 
M DCO=1.00 {I24} (1994Jo12). Not M2 from RUL. 
52% {I1} branch (1985Li12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 289.09 {I18} (1985Li12) for doublet. 
M DCO=0.86 {I11} (1994Jo12) is very high for what is expected (from deduced band structure) to be a D transition; suggests significant Q admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 537.76 {I15} (1985Li12). 
RI I|g(538):I|g(289)=28 {I3}:72 {I3} reported in 1985Li12 does not take into account the fact that the 289|g is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 155.29 {I2} (1985Li12). 
DCO=0.65 {I12} (1994Jo12) 
I|g(156):I|g(570.5+570.9)=10 {I1}:90 {I1} (1985Li12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other E: 570.92 {I6} from 1985Li12; presumed to be for doublet. 
M DCO=1.04 {I5} (1994Jo12). A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} for doublet dominated by this transition (1985Li12). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 341.93 {I7} (1985Li12). 
RI I|g(342):I|g(630)=29 {I3}:71 {I3} (1985Li12). 
M DCO=1.11 {I16}, possibly contaminated by {+83}Y |g (1994Jo12). A D |DJ=1 transition is expected here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Presumed to be the same transition as that with E|g=713.2 {I7} and placed elsewhere in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 814.41 {I17} (1985Li12). 
99% {I1} branch (1985Li12). 
DCO=0.83 {I3}, possibly low due to contamination by an {+83}Y |g (1994Jo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Presumed to be the same transition as that with E|g=872.2 {I9} and placed elsewhere in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$corrected for T{-1/2}=2.8-min isomer decay. 
$|a(K)exp=73 {I18}, ce(K)/(ce(L)+ce(M)+ce(N))exp=1.06 {I37} (1987Ra06). 
M$from |a(K)exp and subshell ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.2 {I3}, |a(L+...)exp=0.13 {I3} (1987Ra06); |a(exp)=1.1 {I2} (1982De36). 
RI$|DI|g estimated by evaluator. 
M$from ce data. |d<0.2 from |a(exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.5 {I1}, |a(L+...)exp=0.017 {I4} (1987Ra06); |a(exp)=0.9 {I6} (1982De36) 
RI$other: 76 {I3} (1982De06) 
M$from ce data in 1987Ra06. |a(exp) from 1982De36 suggests E2, however, uncertainty on the measurement is large. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=0.011 {I2} (1992Bu10) 
RI$other: 54 {I3} (1982De06). 
M$from |a(exp); |d < 0.7 from |a(exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 618 {I60} (1992Cr03). 
M$R{-DCO}=1.05 {I7} (1997Jo03), A{-2}=+0.14 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I2} (1988Li07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1646.0 {I17} in {+83}Y Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 
$B(E2)(W.u.) is a lower limit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compilers' note: RUL=300 for B(E2)(W.u.), which puts limits on the expected value of level lifetime 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1958.6 {I20} in {+83}Y Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 
$B(E2)(W.u.) is a lower limit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced from a delayed spectrum when the 79-ns component is totally decayed; corrected for its own lifetime (2005Io02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
M$D or E2 |g from I(148|g)/I(61|g) ratio; |DJ=1, (D) from angular distribution coefficient A{-2}<0 (|DJ=1, D+Q not excluded); (M1(+E2)) based on |D|p=(no) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$D |g from I(148|g)/I(61|g) ratio; according to 2005Io02, (E1) is more likely, based on B(E1)(W.u.)=1.16|*10{+-6} {I14}, similar to values reported for E1 transitions in this region (while B(M1)(W.u.) is far from the usual values for M1 transitions in this region) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$D |g from I(112|g)/I(98|g) ratio; |DJ=0 supported by angular distribution coefficient A{-2}>0; according to 2005Io02, (E1) is more likely, based on B(E1)(W.u.)=6.9|*10{+-7} {I8}, similar to values reported for E1 transitions in this region (while B(M1)(W.u.) is far from the usual values for M1 transitions in this region) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$ce data in {+85}Zr |e decay (7.86 min) suggest M1,E2; but |g(|q) in ({+37}Cl,2p2n|g) consistent with dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Branching ratios of all |g rays from 2925.6 level are from ({+37}Cl,2p2n|g). Values in ({+16}O,p2n|g) are incomplete 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0044 {I7}, |a(L+...)exp|a(M+...)exp|a(N)exp=0.00084 {I8} (1992Bu10) 
M$1992Bu10 give M1, but comparison of their experimental conversion coefficients and theoretical values suggests M1,E2; adopted mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g from 1977Ia01 only; tentative placement proposed by the evaluators on the basis of level-energy difference. It should be pointed out that a peak near this energy, as part of unresolved doublet with 1938.3 peak, is present in the spectrum figure 1 of 1992Bu10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty of 0.01 keV in 1985Di13 seems unrealistically small, evaluators have assigned 0.05 keV based on minimum uncertainty assigned in 1985Di13 for some other strong |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$1985Di13 give |d=-3.8 {I5}. This value leads to B(E2)(W.u.) value which exceeds RUL. From |g(|q) data, 1985Di13 list |d=-(4.0 {I+24-12}) or -0.16 {I10}. Because 1985Di13 quote B(M1)(W.u.)=0.28 {I+14-4}, it can be concluded that lower value of |d is more likely, and that listed final value of -3.8 {I5} is a misprint in 1985Di13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=0.14 {I2} based on the relative intensities of the 94 keV and 208 keV gammas (2010Ru07,2000Io02) and the 94|g(|q) (1984Da06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Delayed measured I|g(83.9)/I|g(94.1)=0.176 {I6} leads to I(|g+ce)(94.1)/I(|g+ce)(83.9)=91.8 {I3}/8.2 {I3} (2000Io02) 
$|a(exp)=1.38 {I5} from I(|g+ce)(94.1)/I(|g+ce)(208.1)=0.441 {I46} and |a(208|g)=0.052 {I5} (2000Io02) 
$A{-2}=+0.103 {I11} (2000Io02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$Placement based on 314-688-667 cascade in 2000BuZW. Earlier placement was above 3189 level 
$A{-2}=-0.34 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp:|a(L1)exp:|a(M1)exp=100:8.3:1.7 (1962Ki04) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.051 {I10}, average of 0.067 {I11} (1977LaZN), 0.04 {I1} (1962Ki04), and 0.05 {I1} (deduced from |a(exp)=0.06 {I1} of 1961Ha17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M$|a(L3)exp/|a(L2)exp=1.5 {I5} (1962Ki04) consistent with E1, E2, E3; not with M1, M2 or M3. However, B(E1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) are unreasonably small 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=1.016|*10{+-3} {i97} gives mult=M1,E2. Placement in level scheme requires |DJ=2. See dataset from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=1.19|*10{+-3} {i33} gives mult=M1,E2. Placement in level scheme requires |DJ=2. See dataset from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
EKC$=0.53|*10{+-3} {i13} from (p,n|g) 
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp, but placement in level scheme requires |DJ=2 
$B(E2)(W.u.) calculated assuming Q is E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
EKC$=1.77|*10{+-3} {i45}, from (p,n|g) 
M$Using |d from 1980Fi06 with the |a(K)exp from 1980Ta13 and comparing with calculations from BrICC yields the M1+E2 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$Not well determined. (p,n|g), In {+87}Zr |b{++} there is only a weak 921|g, with the spectrum suggesting roughly half that of the 1692|g, whereas (p,n|g) shows the 920|g intensity as slightly less than the 1692|g. In (p,|g) the 920|g intensity is a little over 4 times as high as that of the 1692|g, suggesting, for this case at least, a doublet was observed. In |b{++}, the 1279|g shown dexciting the 2072.7 was not observed, indicating another level close to this energy, as shown here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Transition strengths calculated assuming relative intensity of 3 {i3} for the 27.2|g, based on (|a,2n|g). Using this, B(M2)(W.u.)=37 {I+51-31} which exceeds RUL of 1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from (|a,2n|g) angular distribution and E1+M2 for |d=+0.2 {i4} is eliminated from RUL 
MR from (|a,2n|g); other: -0.08 {I8} from {+80}Se({+11}B,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from {+80}Se({+11}B,4n|g); other: +0.05 {I2} from {+85}Rb(|a,2n|g) 
BE2W$not calculated due to large uncertainty in mixing ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.20 {i20} 
M$Although a calculated mixing ratio of -0.20 {i20} for M2/E1 is reported in ({+11}|b,4n|g), an M2 component is excluded by RUL for larger half-lives reasonably close to 2.1 ps 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$(D+Q) from direction correlation of oriented nuclei in {+80}Se({+11}|b,4n|g) and additional support from level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M,MR reported as E1+M2 with |d=-0.5(4), but this |d gives B(M2)(W.u.)=4.|*10{+2} {I+6-4} which is too large and |d must be essentially zero. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E from {+87}Y Adopted |g's. 
EKC deduced from theoretical |a{-K}=0.181 {I3} for the 388 M4 |g in {+87}Sr and the measured ratio Ice{-K}(381)/Ice{-K}(388)=1.135 {I19} (1966Sa16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
A weak 921 keV was observed but not placed in 1971AwZZ. From the spectra shown, it seems the 921|g has about half the intensity of the 1692 |g. Comparison with data from the 87Sr(p,n|g) reaction (1980Ta13) indicates that this may be the same transition depopulating the (7/2+,9.2+) level at 2073 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=1.01 {I4} (combined value from a doublet) 
RI$From the value of the 1024 peak with the component from the 1024 |g transition from the 2428 level subtracted out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.62 {I2}, 0.90 {I3} (|DJ=1 gated) 
M$D+Q from R(DCO). If the adopted |d of +0.20 {i4} is used E1+M2 is eliminated from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D,Q)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.32 {I2} 
The DCO ratio was smaller than the theoretical results and so no mixing ratio was derived (1998Sc22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D,Q)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.21 {I4} 
The DCO ratio was smaller then theoretical results and so no mixing ratio was derived (1998Sc22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.64 {I7} 
MR$-0.20 {i20} 
M$Although a calculated mixing ratio of -0.20 {i20} for M2/E1 is reported, an M2 component is excluded by RUL for larger half-lives reasonably close to 2.1 ps 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=1.45 {I13} (|DJ=1 gated). 
M$Supports the tentative |p=- assignment, as |p=+ results in an M2 of over 130 W.u., excluded by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.24 {I6} 
M$DCO suggests mult=dipole and placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes; however, this leads to B(E1)(W.u.)=0.02, which exceeds the RUL of 0.01. This was noted in 1998Sc22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from adopted levels. 
M$A{-2}=+1.10 {I 10}, A{-4}=+0.25 {I 10} from Table 1, 1980Fi06, but authors state that contaminant peaks add unknown systematic error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from measured I{-|g}(169)=59 {i6} and I{-|g}(169)=9 {i9} deexciting the 2207 level. 
M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I 2}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I 3}, from Table 2, 1980Fi06, but unresolved doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.44 {I 11}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I 15}, from Table 3, 1980Fi06 implying mult=dipole, and M1 from level structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this placement is considered as questionable by 1980Fi06 because of possible {+86}y impurities; however, it is confirmed by 1988Ko08, because at the E{-|a} value at which they have measured {+86}Y is practically not produced. 
RI$Could be a doublet 
M$A{-2}=+0.14 {I 2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I 3}, from Table 3, 1980Fi06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.44 {I 2}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I 3}, from Table 2, 1980Fi06. Angular distributions give D+Q and RUL eliminates E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.52 {I 11}, A{-4}=0, from Table 3, 1980Fi06 
RI$Calculated using branching ratio of 0.29 {i3} from ({+11}B,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.28 {I 6}, A{-4}=0.02, from Table 2, 1980Fi06, but unresolved doublet 
RI$Unresolved doublet with 768 |g from 3595 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I 2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I 4}, from Table 2, 1980Fi06, but unresolved doublet 
RI$Unresolved double with 771 |g from 3447 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The authors place the 409|g tentatively from the 1202, 1509, and 2210 levels. The branching from the 1202 levels agrees with that from (p,n|g) so the evaluator assigns all the intensity to this placment. Also, the placement from the 1509 level is not confirmed in other reactions populating this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The authors place the 574|g tentatively from the 1756 and the 1979 levels. In (p,n|g) the 574|g is placed only from the 1756 level with branching that agrees wiath that from (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The 1279|g was originally placed by the authors as deexciting the same 2073.31 level as the 920.29|g and 1691.7|g. However, as the 1279|g was not observed in |b{++} decay or (p,n|g), it is likely originating from a different level as shown by the evaluators here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$The spectrum from {+87}Zr |b{++} decay suggests the 920|g has roughly half the intensity of the 1692|g. The (p,n|g) data show the 920|g with intensity slightly less than the 1692|g. Therefore, it is very likely that this is a doublet, a large part of which is unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$=1.016|*10{+-3} {i97} 
M$M1, E2, but placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2, so M1 is ruled out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$=1.19|*10{+-3} {i33} 
M$M1, E2, but placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2, so M1 is ruled out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
EKC$=1.77|*10{+-3} {i45} 
M$D,Q, but since J|p from the Adopted Levels is (15/2+) and this |g decays to a (13/2+), E1 can be ruled out leaving M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.54 {I 3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I 3} Although authors note that contaminant peaks add an unknown systematic error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+1.10 {I 10}, A{-4}=+0.25 {I 10} Although authors note that contaminant peaks add an unknown systematic error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E this placement is by the evaluators and is based on the {+87}Y Adopted |g's. Because this |g is very weak in this reaction no unique assignment can be made on the basis of the observed coincidences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$E1 or M1 from K/(L+M) in {+87}Rb(|a,3n|g), |D|p=no from level scheme. 
E$from {+74}Ge({+18}O,p3n|g),{+76}Ge({+18}O,p5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$other: (E2) from ADO ratio in {+82}Se({+11}B,5n|g), however, E2 is not allowed by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$D from angular distribution and linear polarization in {+74}Ge({+18}O,3np|g),{+76}Ge({+18}O,p5n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I4} for E(p)=5.45 MeV and A{-2}=-0.247 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I16} for E(p)=5.60 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=23.5 {I9} 
M$|DJ=0, M1 also fits |g(|q) and |g(|q)(lin pol) data. 
$R(DCO)=1.75 {I8}, 1.42 {I12} (E1 gated). 
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1}, POL=+0.55 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=26.3 {I10} 
$R(DCO)=0.53 {I3}, 0.52 {I4} (E2 gated); R(DCO)=0.99 {I6}, 0.96 {I8} (E1 gated). 
$A{-2}=-0.34 {I2}, POL=-0.26 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=29.1 {I10} 
$R(DCO)=0.53 {I2}, 0.51 {I3} (E2 gated); R(DCO)=0.97 {I7}, 0.96 {I8} (E1 gated). 
$A{-2}=-0.38 {I3}, POL=-0.24 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=17 {I3} 
$R(DCO)=0.57 {I9}, 0.46 {I6} (E2 gated); R(DCO)=0.85 {I8}, 0.94 {I13} (E1 gated). 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I5}, POL=-0.11 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.0 {I10} 
$R(DCO)=0.58 {I11} (E2 gated); R(DCO)=0.88 {I12}, 0.79 {I10} (E1 gated). 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I10}, POL=+0.06 {I36} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Determined based on an intensity balance between the 483 and 128 keV |g transitions assuming an E1 multipolarity for the former and a M1 for the latter transition. 90% of decay intensity remains unobserved. Authors speculate possible 11 keV and 40 keV gamma transitions from this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Transition was observed and authors state that it is more likely associated with the 1832 keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp) in {+89}Y IT decay. E5 admixture is suggested by L=5 in (e,e'), (p,p'), (n,n') and (|a,|a') from 1/2- 
MR$deduced by the evaluator from B(E5)|^ in (e,e') 
$B(E5)(W.u.) is from (e,e'). Other: B(E5)(W.u.)=0.25 (|a,|a') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from T{-1/2}(level) and B(E2)|^. Sign(|d) from anisotropy in (n,n'|g) which gives |d=+0.69 {I4}, +6 {I1}, -0.15 {I5} or -1.4 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1969Ro02 
RI$from 1964Va03, relative to I|g(588|g in {+89}Zr)=100. Others: 7.1 {I4} (1971Ar18), 7.2 {I8} (1969Ro02), 7.7 {I18} (1953Sh48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_comment:
M$from Adopted Gammas 
A{-2}=A{-4}=POL=0 (normalized value). |g(|q) data for other transitions normalized to 909|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by a line from {+37}Ar. Total I|g=4.5 {I4} 
For doublet: A{-2}=+0.04 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-14.3 (1988Ba32), -0.08 {I3} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I5}, POL=+0.25 {I10} 
A2=-0.05 7, A4=+0.07 10 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.290 20, A4=0 (1979Fi05) 
A2=-0.25 6, A4=0.00 6 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I6}, POL=+0.83 {I24} 
A2=+0.19 8, A4=+0.04 10 (1988Ba32) 
A2=+0.083 24, A4=+0.06 4 (1979Fi05) 
A2=+0.17 11, A4=-0.20 11 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(450.5)/I|g(777.0)=0.062 {I6} (1992Fu04), 0.033 {I12} (1988Ba32) 
|d(Q/D)=-0.15 {I10} (1988Ba32) 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I9}, POL=-0.44 {I17} 
A2=+0.28 13, A4=0.00 10 (1988Ba32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d(Q/D)=-0.03 {I8} (1988Ba32), <+0.05 (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5}, POL=+0.35 {I4} 
A2=-0.22 2, A4=+0.06 3 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.231 21, A4=+0.07 3 (1979Fi05) 
A2=-0.41 8, A4=0.00 8 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.07 {I10} (1988Ba32) 
A{-2}=-0.12 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I2}, POL=-0.31 {I10} 
A2=-0.10 3, A4=+0.07 5 (1988Ba32) 
A2=+0.18 3 , A4=0 (1979Fi05) FOR A DOUBLET 
A2=-0.09 12, A4=0.0 3 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d(Q/D)=-0.10 {I16} (1988Ba32), -0.06 {I3} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4}, POL=+0.36 {I9} 
A2=-0.36 6, A4=+0.08 8 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.288 20, A4=+0.05 4 (1979Fi05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1992Fu04. E|g=1360.3 {I3} (1988Ba32) 
A{-2}=-0.21 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I11} (1992Fu04). A{-2}=+0.41 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I10} (1988Ba32). Note disagreement of sign of A{-2} 
Placement from 1992Fu04 on the basis of 1361-1984 |g|g, thus suggesting incorrect placement from 6199 level by 1988Ba32. Poor energy agreement and different sign of A{-2} in 1988Ba32 may suggest that there are two different |g rays near this energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1988Ba32. |d=-0.09 {I3} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I6}, POL=-0.18 {I5} 
A2=-0.28 4, A4=-0.02 5 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.346 25, A4=+0.00 3 (1979Fi05) 
A2=-0.16 7, A4=0.00 17 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I6}, POL=+0.40 {I9} 
A2=+0.25 5, A4=-0.03 6 (1988Ba32) 
A2=+0.296 20, A4=+0.03 3 (1979Fi05) 
A2=+0.53 9, A4=0.0 3 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 1992Fu04. 1988Ba32 suggested it from 5880 level which does not agree with energy difference. Appearance of a 570|g in |g|g with gate at 95|g (figure 3 in 1988Ba32) supports placement from 4825 level, not 5880 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d(Q/D)=+0.03 {I13} (1988Ba32) 
A{-2}=-0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I10}, POL=+0.37 {I8} 
A2=-0.17 4, A4=+0.10 6 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.47 7, A4=0.00 2 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.23 {I9} (1988Ba32) 
A{-2}=+0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, POL=-0.47 {I7} 
A2=+0.13 4, A4=+0.02 5 (1988Ba32) 
A2=+0.110 20, A4=+0.02 3 (1979Fi05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1988Ba32. |d=-0.07 {I2} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} 
A2=-0.14 9, A4=-0.20 10 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.28 3, A4=+0.01 5 (1979Fi05) 
A2=-0.21 5, A4=0.00 11 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I8}, POL=+0.21 {I4} 
FOR 470.5G+471.1G: A2=-0.362 20, A4=+0.06 4 (1979Fi05) 
FOR 470.5G+471.1G: A2=-0.46 6, A4=0.00 13 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.05 {I11} (1988Ba32), -0.18 {I6} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}, POL=-0.23 {I5} 
A2=-0.30 5, A4=+0.07 7 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.468 15, A4=+0.033 24 (1979Fi05) 
A2=-0.37 3, A4=0.00 7 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I10} 
FOR 470.5G+471.1G: A2=-0.362 20, A4=+0.06 4 (1979Fi05) 
FOR 470.5G+471.1G: A2=-0.46 6, A4=0.00 13 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by 1984|g double escape peak. Total I|g=3.0 {I5} 
For composite line A{-2}=+0.09 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.6 {I2} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.52 {I6}, POL=-0.20 {I17} 
A2=-0.82 8, A4=0.0 (1988Ba32). UNCERTAINTY OF 0.80 (1988Ba32) ON A2 SEEMS TO BE A MISPRINT 
A2=-0.82 8, A4=0 (1979Fi05) 
A2=-0.65 18, A4=0.0 4 (1978Da13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by a line from {+37}Ar. Total I|g=3.0 {I2} 
For composite line A{-2}=-0.02 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by an unidentified isotope. Total I|g=1.5 {I2} 
|d(Q/D)=+0.14 {I13} (1988Ba32) 
For composite line A{-2}=-0.41 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I8} 
A2=+0.01 7, A4=+0.27 10 (1988Ba32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
|d(Q/D)=+4.0 {I3} (1988Ba32) 
A{-2}=-0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I9} (1992Fu04). A{-2}=+0.36 {I20}, A{-4}=0.0 (1988Ba32). Note disagreement of sign of A{-2} 
A2=+0.04 7, A4=0 (1979Fi05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|d(Q/D)=-0.17 {I7} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.35 {I6} 
A2=-0.35 7, A4=-0.10 8 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.48 5, A4=+0.16 8 (1979Fi05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by 402.7|g (mult=M1) from {+87}Rb. Total I|g=3.2 {I3} 
|d(Q/D)=+0.09 {I20} (1988Ba32), <+0.08 (1979Fi05) 
For composite line: A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4}, POL=-0.24 {I12} 
A2=-0.11 13, A4=-0.8 18 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.164 21, A4=+0.04 4 (1979Fi05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.10 {I20} (1988Ba32), -0.35 {I10} (1979Fi05) 
A{-2}=-0.42 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I10}, POL=-0.25 {I25} 
A2=-0.06 11, A4=-0.15 15 (1988Ba32) 
A2=-0.64 5, A4=+0.15 8 (1979Fi05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1997Re13. Others: 1508.0 {I2} (2009Be03), 1507.2 {I1} in table 1 and 1507.6 in figure 2 of 1993Hu05 
I|g(150|')/I|g(90|')=1.52 {I12} gives |d=+0.69 {I4}, +6 {I1}, -0.15 {I5} or -1.4 {I2} (1968Al13). |d(E2/M1)=0.15 is consistent with B(E2)(e,e') and T{-1/2} (|g|g') 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.99 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2881.6 {I2} (2009Be03), 2881.48 {I10} (1997Re13), 2881.6 {I1} (1993Hu05) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.91 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3067.6 {I2} (2009Be03) and 3067.7 {I1} (1997Re13). Other: 3067.0 {I3} in table 1 and 3067.2 in figure 2 of 1993Hu05 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.06 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3107.6 {I2} (2009Be03), 3107.4 {I3} (1997Re13) and 3106.9 {I6} (1993Hu05) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.20 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3139.4 {I3} (2009Be03), 3139.0 {I4} (1997Re13) and 3139.0 {I5} (1993Hu05) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.2 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3516.5 {I2} (2009Be03), 3515.8 {I3} (1997Re13) and 3515.6 {I6} (1993Hu05) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.06 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3992.3 {I2} (2009Be03), 3992.0 {I1} (1997Re13). Other: 3991.8 {I3} in table 1 and 3991.5 in figure 2 of 1993Hu05 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.81 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4171.6 {I3} (2009Be03), 4171.2 {I1} (1997Re13). Others: 4170.2 {I4} (1993Hu05), 4172.0 (1997Re13) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.07 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4616.7 {I5} (1997Re13) and 4617.7 {I15} (2009Be03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.3 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.8 {I4} 
E$weighted average of 4991 {I1} (1997Re13) and 4993.3 {I15} (2009Be03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|G{-0}=0.10 {I6} (1976CaZD) 
E$others: 5624.6 {I2} (1997Re13), 5625 (1976CaZD) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.89 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.2 {I3} 
E$1997Re13 report 5792.5 {I5}, probably represents 5789+5796 in 2009Be03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1984Bu28 only. This transition is considered suspect (evaluator) since it is not confirmed by 1986Na18 and in {+89}Zr |e decay where such a transition should have been detected 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$based on I|g=26 in figure 2 of 1986Na18. In table I, authors value of 22.5 {I22} seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_comment:
RI$includes contributions from {+89}Zr |e decay. 
M$ from Adopted Gammas 
A{-2}=-0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1}, POL=+0.02 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.69 {I13} 
$ADO ratio seems consistent with |DJ=1, dipole rather than with |DJ=0 (assumed dipole) transition assigned in 2016Li34. Low value of ADO may indicate a significant quadrupole admixture in the |DJ=0 transition (compilers' note). 


