# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The E|g, I|g values from 1982Ra19, 1973Me25 and 19878Bu13 for this |g are listed from 484 level 
$Ice(K)=0.6 {I3} and 0.8 {I4} (1980AdZP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=361.05 {I14}, I|g=32 {I3} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=360.51 {I10}, I|g=32.7 {I20} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=361.0 {I2}, I|g=28.8 {I11} (1978Bu13, placed from a 613 level) 
$Ice(K)=1.5 {I7} and 1.7 {I8} (1980AdZP) 
$|a(K)exp values overlap M1 and E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=373.01 {I14}, I|g=15.1 {I25} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=372.45 {I10}, I|g=13.4 {I15} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=372.0 {I2}, I|g=12.7 {I52} (1978Bu13, unplaced) 
$Ice(K)=0.2 {I1} (1980AdZP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=458.56 {I10}, I|g=15.0 {I21} (1982Ra19, placed from 591 level only based on |g|g-coin data). 1980AdZP placed this |g from 783 level, which is not consistent with |g|g-coin data in 1982Ra19. Evaluators prefer assignment of 458.77|g from 591 level 
$E|g=458.12 {I12}, I|g=12.4 {I10} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=532.82 {I38}, I|g=6.7 {I2} (1982Ra19, uncertainty for I|g seems too low in comparison to those for other I|g values) 
$E|g=532.69 {I20}, I|g=4.6 {I10} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=687.3 {I1}, I|g=11.7 {I25} (1982Ra19, placed from 874 level) 
$E|g=686.60 {I15}, I|g=10.2 {I10} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=686.0 {I2}, I|g=14.7 {I12} (1978Bu13, unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g placed from 1719 level in 1980AdZP 
$E|g=770.8 {I5}, I|g=5.9 {I17} (1982Ra19, tentative placement) 
$E|g=770.68 {I40}, I|g=3.7 {I7} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Total I|g=19.9 {I8} for the doublet (1980AdZP) 
$E|g=356.83 {I10}, I|g=21 {I3} (1982Ra19, combined I|g for double placement, 15 {I3} from 948 level, 10 {I4} from 484 level) 
$E|g=356.52 {I10}, I|g=20.8 {I15} (1973Me25, combined I|g for double placement, other placement from 484 level) 
$E|g=356.2 {I2}, I|g=16.9 {I14} (1978Bu13) 
$Ice(K)=0.6 {I3} and 0.8 {I4} (1980AdZP) 
$|d(E2/M1)>1.5 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=454.97 {I15}, I|g=2.2 {I10} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=454.70 {I30}, I|g=3.0 {I6} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=455.2 {I2}, I|g=10.2 {I7} (1978Bu13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This |g is placed from 1734 level only in 1980AdZP, whereas 1982Ra19 place this |g from 1361 level only, based on its observation in coincidence with 120|g. Evaluators prefer the assignment in 1982Ra19 
$E|g=1240.58 {I18}, I|g=4.7 {I13} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=1240.57 {I35}, I|g=6.2 {I10} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g is unplaced in 1980AdZP 
$E|g=1571.8 {I4}, I|g=2.9 {I10} (1982Ra19, tentative placement) 
$E|g=1572.33 {I55}, I|g=2.5 {I7} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Tentative placement by 1982Ra19 from 944 level only, while 1980AdZP place this |g from 1719 level only. For E|g, I|g data for this |g in 1982Ra19 and 1973Me25, see the listing of |g-ray data for 944 level. Evaluators place this |g from both the levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Tentative placement suggested in 1987Pe01 evaluation based on level-energy difference; unplaced in 1980AdZP 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This |g is unplaced in 1980AdZP 
$E|g=1861.0 {I4}, I|g=2.8 {I4} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=1862.27 {I45}, I|g=4.6 {I15} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This |g is unplaced in 1980AdZP 
$E|g=1886.9 {I8}, I|g=1.8 {I3} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=1887.05 {I45}, I|g=4.3 {I15} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g is unplaced in 1980AdZP 
$E|g=1478.6 {I2}, I|g=1.0 {I3} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=1479.02 {I45}, I|g=2.6 {I8} (1973Me25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=1.05 {I7} (1979Ri06). Using E|g=87.54 {I6} from the Adopted Gammas, and BrIccMixing, |d(E2/M1)=1.10 {I+8-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$1974Ri12 place this |g in a cascade of 197.5|g-61|g-109.8|g to ground state with no observed coincidence data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$R(asym)=0.81 {I10} 
$ Uncertainty of 0 on R(asym) seems a misprint. The evaluators have assigned 0.10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 832|g-228|g(|q) in {+166}Lu |e decay (2.65 min); larger |d solution rejected based on measured |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR -0.2 {I1} or -10 {I+3-13} from 997|g-228|g(|q) (2007Mc08) in {+166}Lu |e decay (2.65 min); |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I3} in (|a,xn|g) rules out the first option. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1151.1 {I4} in |e decay (2.65 min) and 1152.0 {I3} in (|a,xn|g). 
RI from |e decay (2.65 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M Q from DCO ratio in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) for intraband |g. However, |g may Be a doublet in this reaction based on I(289|g)/I(151|g)=8 {I4} cf. adopted value of 1.7 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=1.1 {I3}, |a(L)exp=1.4 {I3} and |a(M+N)=0.51 {I9} (1974De09). 
%I|g=25.4 {I6} assuming recommended normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.10 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.045 {I4} (1974De09) and A{-2}=+0.104 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I26} for 228|g-102|g(|q) (2007Mc08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from A{-2}=+0.019 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.075 {I25} for 832|g-228|g(|q) (2007Mc08). (evaluator's analysis gives |d=+0.50 {I+8-7} or -2.6 {I+5-7}; second solution is rejected because |a(K)exp from (|a,xn|g) implies pure M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas. Consistent with |a(K)exp=0.006 {I4} (1974De09). 
MR from Adopted Gammas. |d=-0.2 {I1} or -10 {I+3-13} from authors' analysis of A{-2}=-0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} for 997|g-228|g(|q) (2007Mc08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,TI from Adopted Gammas. I(|g+ce) based on adopted branching and I(|g+ce) feeding level, assuming no |e+|b{++} branch to level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.28 {I18} (1974De09).(|a(K)exp consistent with M1 or E2 but |DJ=2 from decay scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.70 {I26} (|a(exp) have been deduced from |g|g coincidence measurement) (1974De09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI possibly contaminated by another transition (1987Be07). 
DCO=1.33 {I19} (1987Be07) for possibly contaminated |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from 1973Sa14. Other E|g: 102.2 {I3} (1972Li34). 
A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1981Wa23); A{-2}=+0.063 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.027 {I12} (1967Ne02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from 1973Sa14. Other E|g: 102.9 {I3} (1984Fi18), 102.2 {I3} (1972Li34). 
M A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4} (1972Li34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from 1973Sa14. Other E|g: 227.8 {I3} (1984Fi18); 228.1 {I3} (1972Li34). 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1972Li34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other E|g: 337.7 {I3} (1972Li34); 337.3 {I2} (1973Sa14); 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0455 {I10} (1984Fi18) and A{-2}=+0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1972Li34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1983Fi12. All or most of 932.4|g+932.1|g doublet I|g belongs to the 932.1|g, based on |g assignment in 1984Fi18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0202 {I5} (1984Fi18) and A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1972Li34). 
E from 1984Fi18. Other E|g: 430.4 {I2} (1973Sa14), 430.2 {I3} (1972Li34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I4} (1984Fi18) 
|g is unplaced in 1984Fi18; placed by evaluator, consistent with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E other E|g: 569.3 {I4} (1973Sa14); 569.7 {I3} (1972Li34). 
M |a(K)exp=0.018 {I5} (1984Fi18) (0.018 {I2} in 1983Fi12) for doublet; A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1972Li34) for line contaminated by E2 |g in {+207}Pb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<0.0010 (1984Fi18). 
1984Fi18 indicate that this |g also deexcites the 1039 level, but E|g does not fit that placement. 
See 1983Na14 for 925|g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.34 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (1972Li34); |a(K)exp=0.020 {I13} (1984Fi18). 
E other E|g: 603.8 {I2} (1972Li34), 603.3 {I4} (1973Sa14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placed by evaluator, consistent with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 1984Fi18 place it between the J=12 and J=10 members of the |g band but, in Adopted Levels, Gammas, E|g=466.9 for that transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from Er(|a,Xn|g), {+166}Er({+3}He,3n|g), dataset in ENSDF database, based on measured K-shell conversion coefficient=0.017 {I3} (1984Fi18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, and B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 
E,M$from (|a,3n|g), D+Q; M1+E2 from level scheme 
RI$others: 60 {I6} from (O,xn|g), 72 {I8} from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,M$from (|a,3n|g), |DJ=2; Mult=M2 ruled out by RUL 
RI$others: 100 {I10} from (O,xn|g) and (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,M$from (|a,3n|g), D+Q; M1+E2 from level scheme; E2 ruled out by RUL 
RI$unweighted average of 15 {I3} in (O,xn|g) and 39 {I4} in (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 263.4 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 263.5 {I3} from (O,xn|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I9} from (|a,3n|g), 100 {I15} from (O,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp in {+154}Sm({+16}O,3ne{+-}) (2019Sm01); see details listed in {+124}Sn({+48}Ca,5n|g) dataset; Q, |DJ=2 from (|a,3n|g) and (O,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 316.6 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 316.8 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$others: 55 {I9} from (|a,3n|g), 97 {I15} from (O,xn|g) 
M$D+Q from (O,xn|g); E1+M2 from level scheme; M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 
E$others: 236.5 {I2} from (O,xn|g), 236.5 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 24.5 {I19} from (|a,3n|g) and 54 {I6} from (O,xn|g) 
M$D+Q from (O,xn|g) and (|a,3n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 314.2 {I2} from (O,xn|g), 314.2 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$from (O,xn|g) and (|a,3n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp in {+154}Sm({+16}O,3ne{+-}) (2019Sm01); see details listed in {+124}Sn({+48}Ca,5n|g) dataset; Q, |DJ=2 from (O,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from (|a,3n|g); (M1) from RUL, as B(E2)(W.u.) is much larger than value of 1000 from RUL for E2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 341.2 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 341.2 {I2} from (O,xn|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from (O,xn|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from (|a,3n|g) and (O,xn|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), I|g from (|a,3n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp in {+154}Sm({+16}O,3ne{+-}) (2019Sm01); see details listed in {+124}Sn({+48}Ca,5n|g) dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 329.9 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) and 329.4 {I5} from (|a,3n|g), I|g from (|a,3n|g). 
RI$from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.036 {I+8-6}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=147 {I+34-24} 
E$others: 339.4 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 339.8 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 22.2 {I9} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 21.1 {I33} from (O,xn|g), and 18.2 {I30} from (|a,3n|g). 
M$D+Q from (O,xn|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 416.4 {I2} from (O,xn|g), 416.3 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from (O,xn|g) and (|a,3n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Measured I|g(61.2|g)=2.4 {I8}, relative to 100 for 400.5|g (2013Gl01) from |g|g-coin data in {+154}Sm({+18}O,5n|g) and using intensity balance arguments. See details listed in {+124}Sn({+48}Ca,5n|g) dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 401.0 {I1} from (|a,3n|g), 400.5 {I2} from (O,xn|g), and 400.5 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from (O,xn|g) and (|a,3n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 409.1 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 409.1 {I2} from (O,xn|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I14} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 548.3 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 548 {I1} from (O,xn|g), and 549.1 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from (O,xn|g). Other: 50 {I14} from (|a,3n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,3n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp in {+154}Sm({+16}O,3ne{+-}) (2019Sm01); see details listed in {+124}Sn({+48}Ca,5n|g) dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 10 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) and 11.1 {I23} from (O,xn|g) 
M$D+Q from (O,xn|g) and (|a,3n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 508.9 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 508.9 {I2} from (O,xn|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I10} from (|a,3n|g) and (O,xn|g) 
M$Q from (O,xn|g); likely E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 479.4 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 479.4 {I2} from (O,xn|g), and 479.9 {I1} from (|a,3n|g) 
M$Q from (|a,3n|g); likely E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.25 {I+12-15} or -3.0 {I+10-19} (1981Kr08); evaluators consider lower value as more likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M$|d(Q/D)=+3.2 {I28}, if J(2012)=9/2, |d(Q/D)=+0.6 {I7} if J(2012)=7/2 (1981Kr08) from |e decay; |DJ|=2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 547.0 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 547.0 {I2} from ({+17}O,4n|g), and 547.3 {I1} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 557.4 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 557.4 {I5} from ({+17}O,4n|g), and 558.7 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 589.0 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 588.9 {I2} from ({+17}O,4n|g), and 589.3 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 553.4 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) and 553 {I1} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
M$from (O,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 600.7 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) and 600 {I1} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
M$from (O,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 742.6 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) and 742 {I1} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
M$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 803.2 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) and 801 {I1} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
M$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=0.93 {I5} (1985Ba47) 
M$|a(K)(theory)=0.0757 for E2 and 2.68 for M3 gives pure E2, when compared with |a(K)exp, with no M3 admixture; |a(L+M)exp gives |d(M3/E2)<0.11, consistent with pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)theory=0.0465 for E2 and 1.39 for M3 gives |d(M3/E2)<0.075, when compared with |a(K)exp value; |a(L+M)exp gives |d(M3/E2)<0.11; both consistent with pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)theory=0.241 for E2 and 0.579 for M1 gives pure E2, with no M1 admixture, when compared with |a(K)exp value; |a(L+M)exp overlaps M1 and E2 for all |d values. 2019Sm01 give |d{+2}(E2/M1)|>2.5 or |d|>1.58. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Measured I|g(61.2|g)=2.4 {I8}, relative to 100 for 400.5|g (2013Gl01) by determining I|g values of 416.8|g, 339.4|g and 401.0|g with gate on 479.9|g in |g|g-coin and using intensity balance arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$I|g:I|g(593.2)=66 {I4}:100 {I6} (1996Sm05). 
M,MR$|a(K)theory=0.347 for M1 and 0.143 for E2 gives M1+E2, with |d(E2/M1)=1.6 {I6}, when compared with |a(K)exp value. 2019Sm01 give |d{+2}(E2/M1)|>0.9 or |d|>0.95 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement as shown in level-scheme Fig. 3 of 1975Li03. In authors' Table 154.0|g appears assigned as transition from the 13/2- level, and 154.7|g as unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from an unplaced |g in Table 1 in 1975Li03; placement from a 225.7|g shown in authors' level-scheme Fig. 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 in 1975Li03, E|g=479.7 in authors' Fig. 3 
$Positive A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=29.66 {I1}, I|g=420 {I36} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=170 {I20}, scaled to 374 {I44} (1976Me06) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.71 {I5}:1.02 {I6} (1987BaZB) 
$L1:L2:L3=124:93:129 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=5.25:3.52:4.40:1.55:0.97:1.37:0.91 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from energy difference between 29.7 and 33.9 levels. Transition unobserved, but existence confirmed in |g|g-coin (1976Me06). 
TI$|>568 {I81} and |<813 {I102} based on I(|g+ce) balance at 34 and 30 levels, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=33.91 {I1}, I|g=81 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=35 {I4} (1976Me06) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.69 {I3}:1.01 {I5} (1987BaZB) 
$L1:L2:L3=36:26:39 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=1.65:1.03:1.82:0.38:0.21:0.34:0.21 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=24.63 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g<1.6, scaled to <3.5 (1976Me06) 
$L1:L2:L3=111:90:103 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.70 {I3}:0.78 {I4} (1987BaZB) 
$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N=2.3:1.5:1.5:0.57:0.57:0.52 (1971Ab04) 
$I|g in 1976Me06 implies |a(L)exp>87 
MR$from L-subshell ratios (1987BaZB). Other: 0.157 {I+19-22} (1975VyZY, L-subshell ratios). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=28.88 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g<20, scaled to <44 (1976Me06) 
$L1:L2:L3=0.5:34:34 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3:M2=< 0.12:1.15:1.37:0.46 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=44.77 {I2}, I|g<80 (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=13 {I3}, scaled to 29 {I7} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$L1:L2:L3=7.7:3.1:4.6 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
$E|g=78.67 {I2}, I|g=52.5 {I25} for 78.33|g + 78.67|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=16 {I2}, scaled to 35 {I4} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2:L3=65 {I18}:8.8:129:129 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=67.37 {I2}, I|g=11.9 {I14} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=6 {I1} (1976Me06) 
$L1:L2:L3=17:5.9:8.5 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=0.63:0.23:0.27:0.17:0.068:0.12 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=100.22 {I2}, I|g=8.4 {I12} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=4.8 {I16} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=10 {I3}:1.0:9.0:7.7 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=0.05:0.32:0.30:0.08:0.08 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=120.31 {I3}, I|g=24.7 {I14} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=6.0 {I10}, scaled to 13.2 {I22} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=3.1 {I7}:0.5:|<0.13:|<0.10 (1975VyZY) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=144.97 {I3}, I|g=43 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=24 {I2} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=3.6 {I8}:0.26:<0.13 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1976Me06 
$E|g=178.87 {I4}, I|g=59.0 {I36} for 178.87|g+179.69|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=29 {I3}, scaled to 64 {I7} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=11.3 {I20}:1.0:1.65:1.78 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.43:|?0.05:0.08:0.06 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=179.69 {I4}, I|g=59.0 {I36} for 178.87|g+179.69|g, Ice(K)=2.3 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g<3, scaled to <6.6 (1976Me06, placed only from 179.8 level) 
$|a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas. This |g reported in all the three in-beam |g-ray reaction studies 
RI$from ({+17}O,4n|g),({+18}O,5n|g) (1982Ro08), expected I|g=8.7 {I12} if M1, but no such transition has been reported in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of the two values 
$E|g=127.42 {I7}, I|g=10.0 {I11} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=4.0 {I15} (1976Me06, unplaced) 
M$from the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=188.66 {I5}, I|g=48.0 {I24} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=22 {I1} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=10 {I2}:0.72:1.23:1.6 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.4:|<0.04:0.07:0.06 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=183.61 {I5}, I|g|?4, Ice(K)|?0.25 (1975VyZY) 
$I|g|?3, scaled to |?6.6 (1976Me06) 
$K:L1=0.08:0.02 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=213.19 {I4}, I|g=86 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=39 {I2} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=31 {I6}:4.13:0.41:|<0.1 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=1.23:0.16:|?0.02:<0.01 (1971Ab04) 
MR$|<0.18 in 1975VyZY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=160.49 {I2}, I|g=7.3 {I16}, Ice(K)=3.6 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=2.7 {I2}, scaled to 5.9 {I4} (1976Me06) 
M$E2(+M1) for doubly placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of the two values 
$E|g=205.45 {I10}, I|g=11.5 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=3.5 {I7}, scaled to 7.7 {I15} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of the two values 
$E|g=209.56 {I10}, I|g=20 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=8.4 {I7} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=239.22 {I4}, I|g=237 {I10} for 239.0|g+239.22|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=90 {I5}, scaled to 198 {I11} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2:L3=57 {I10}:8.44:0.8:<0.1 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=1.86:0.28:0.034:<0.01 (1971Ab04) 
$M1 from ce data; M1+E2 with |d=+2.9 {I+15-9} from |g(|q), where measurement affected by the presence of 239.0|g, but I|g(239.2|g)/I|g(239.0|g)=9.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=69.83 {I2}, I|g|<0.8 (1975VyZY) 
$I|g<2, scaled to <4.4 (1976Me06) 
$L1:L2:L3=0.77:7.7:6.5 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3:M2=<0.057:0.21:<0.12:0.057 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$placement from 258.6 level only in 1976Gr06. Somewhat poor fit in this location with level-energy difference=179.85 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=258.54 {I4}, I|g=36 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=15.0 {I10} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=8.3 {I15}:1.1:0.13:0.15 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.32:0.043:|?0.005 (1971Ab04) 
MR$-2.6|<|d|<+0.2 (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=19.68 {I2} (1975VyZY). Ice(M1)=0.23 (1971Ab04) 
$I|g<4, scaled to <9 (1976Me06) 
TI$>2 from Ice(L1)|?1.5 (1975VyZY), |<37 from intensity balance at 259 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=89.49 {I2}, I|g=3 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=1.0 {I3} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=4.1 {I10}:|?0.26:3.1:2.6 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N=0.25:|?0.02:0.17:0.17:|?0.03:|?0.03 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=248.64 {I7}, I|g=23 {I3}, Ice(K)=0.6 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=8.0 {I15} (1976Me06) 
MR$<0.10 from |a(K)exp; +0.45 {I+11-48} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=278.2 {I1}, I|g=107 {I10} for 278.2|g+278.9|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=10 {I3}, scaled to 22 {I7} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06; deduced from |g|g-coin data for 278.22|g, 278.5|g and 278.92|g (unresolved) triplet 
$K:L1:L2:L3=6.6 {I13}:1.2:0.5:|?0.08 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.27:0.05:<0.009 (1971Ab04) 
$|d(E2/M1)=1.1 {I+5-3} (1975VyZY) from subshell data; but |a(K)exp exceeds |a(K) for M1, assuming that Ice(K for 278.2|g) in 1975VyZY includes no contribution from the 278.5|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=222.79 {I4}, I|g=27.1 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=13.0 {I10} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=2.8 {I5}:0.68:1.1:0.69 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.13:0.02:0.03:0.02 (1971Ab04) 
$|d(O/Q)=+0.30 {I+59-31} (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of the two values 
$E|g=243.5 {I5}, I|g=6 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=9.0 {I15}, scaled to 20 {I3} probably for 242.8|g+243.5|g doublet (1976Me06) 
E$from 1975VyZY. Other: 243.4 {I1} (1971Ab04) probably for 242.8|g+243.5|g doublet. 
$|a(K)exp implies |d|<0.06; |g(|q) gives |d=+0.20 {I14} (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$E|g=95.27 {I2}, I|g=6.2 {I12} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=3.0 {I6} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=38 {I10}:3.4:0.52:0.13 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=1.25:0.13:<0.02 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=229.78 {I4}, I|g=26.5 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=11.6 {I10} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=6.5 {I13}:0.91:<0.15 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.31:0.05:<0.009 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=274.41 {I2}, I|g=6 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.26 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=2.2 {I2}, scaled to 4.8 {I4} (1976Me06, unplaced) 
E$unweighted average of the two values. Somewhat poor fit in the decay scheme as level-energy difference=274.49 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=278.9 {I1}, I|g=107 {I10} for 278.2|g+278.9|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=21 {I4}, scaled to 46 {I9} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06, deduced from |g|g-coin from 278.22|g, 278.5|g, 178.92|g (unresolved) triplet 
$K:L1=2.5 {I5}:0.18 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1=0.057:0.007 (1971Ab04) 
$Ice(K) in 1975VyZY may include contribution from the 278.5|g established by 1976Me06 using |g|g-coin. If the 278.9|g is E1 (as required by the level scheme), Ice(K)=1.6 {I6} and |a(K)exp=0.07 {I3} for the 278.5|g component, consistent with E2 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=308.47 {I8}, I|g=8.7 {I9} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=308.47 {I9}, I|g=3.4 {I3} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=1.3 {I3}:0.21:<0.05 (1975VyZY) 
MR$+0.04|<|d|<+4.53 or |<-5.7 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
TI,M$Ice(L1)=1.5, I|g|<0.8 (1975VyZY), so |a(L1)exp|>1.9, consistent with M1(+E2), with E1 ruled out. I(|g+ce)<3 if M1, |?440 if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$E|g=78.33 {I2}, I|g=52.5 {I25} for 78.33|g+78.67|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=6 {I2}, scaled to 13 {I4} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2:L3=88 {I25}:26:4.3:2.1 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=5.25:0.63:0.12:<0.06:0.12:<0.02 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1976Me06 
$E|g=138.7 {I2}, I|g|?5 (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=2.0 {I7}, scaled to 4.4 {I15} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=239.0 {I1}, I|g=237 {I10} for 239.0|g+239.22|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=10 {I5}, scaled to 22 {I11} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2:L3=5.4 {I10}:0.77:0.21:<0.08 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.23:0.034:<0.011 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1975VyZY. 1976Me06 quote the same value as in 1971Ab04 
$E|g=317.55 {I10}, I|g=46.8 {I30} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=317.65 {I10}, I|g=17.0 {I12} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=4.3 {I8}:1.08:<0.08 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.19:0.033:<0.011 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=102.56 {I2}, I|g=16.5 {I30} for 102.56|g+102.08|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=2.0 {I7}, scaled to 6.6 {I15} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2=24 {I7}:4.1:0.77 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1=1.25:0.14:0.02:0.011:0.34 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=232.12 {I4}, I|g=5.3 {I13} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=2.1 {I2}, scaled to 4.6 {I4} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2=0.76 {I15}:0.16:<0.16 (1975VyZY) 
MR$-3.0|<|d|<+0.2 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=332.3 {I1}, I|g=4.5 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.4 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=332.48 {I15}, I|g=1.3 {I2}, scaled to 3.6 {I6} (1976Me06) 
$Placement of 332.36|g from 411 or 571 levels in 1976Me06, whereas 1976Gr06 suggested placement only from 411 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
$E|g=377.00 {I9}, I|g=24.9 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.23 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=377.08 {I11}, I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06) 
MR$|<0.08 from |a(K)exp; +0.08|<|d|<+0.90 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=381.50 {I15}, I|g=19.1 {I25} for 381.50|g+382.00|g, Ice(K)=0.18 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=381.35 {I15}, I|g=6.0 {I6}, scaled to 16.8 {I17} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=411.06 {I10}, I|g=19.9 {I24}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=410.86 {I10}, I|g=6.3 {I5} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=102.08 {I2}, I|g=16.5 {I30} for 102.08|g+102.56|g (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=5.0 {I10} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06. 
$K:L1:L2=28 {I7}:5.2:0.77 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:M1=1.37:0.17:<0.02:0.05 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
TI$based on Ice(K)=1.8 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$Ice(K)=5.0 {I11} if E2, 2.2 {I5} if M1 (Rosel |a(K)). 
M$|a(K)exp rules out E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 1975VyZY. 1976Me06 quote the same value as in 1971Ab04 
$E|g=340.90 {I15}, I|g=10.5 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$Uncertainty in 1975VyZY is assumed to be 0.15 keV as in 1971Ab04, rather than 1.5 keV 
$E|g=340.91 {I15}, I|g=4.2 {I4} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=1.1 {I2}:0.1:<0.05 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1976Me06 
$E|g=385.68 {I15}, I|g=18.9 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.24 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=385.46 {I12}, I|g=6.0 {I8} (1976Me06) 
M$|a(K)exp gives E1 for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1976Me06 
$E|g=352.3 {I2}, I|g=9.8 {I25} for 352.3|g+350.5|g, Ice(K)=0.06 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=352.03 {I10}, I|g=3.4 {I3}, scaled to 9.5 {I8} (1976Me06), probably for 350.5+352.3 doublet as in 1975VyZY 
RI,M$I|g=9.5 {I8} (1976Me06), presumably for 350.5|g+352.3|g doublet since, otherwise, |a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} for this doublet in 1975VyZY, too low to be consistent with E1. Ice(K)=0.06 {I2} for each component (1975VyZY) favors E1 for each, therefore, evaluators assign I|g=4.8 {I4} for each |g. 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.26 {I+70-90} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); anisotropy excludes J(431)=5/2 based on magnitude of |d required if |DJ=2 (1981Kr08). |a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1975VyZY. 1976Me06 quote the same value as in 1971Ab04 
$E|g=372.5 {I1}, I|g=8.8 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.8 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=372.38 {I15}, I|g=3.0 {I3}, scaled to 8.4 {I8} (1976Me06, unplaced) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2=0.049:0.009:<0.002 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=396.83 {I15}, I|g=21.6 {I21} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=396.99 {I10}, I|g=8.0 {I6} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=0.9 {I2}:0.077:<0.05 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of the two values 
$E|g=401.25 {I6}, I|g=82.0 {I41} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=401.05 {I7}, I|g=28.0 {I15} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=5.16:0.75:<0.10 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.193:0.033:<0.008 (1971Ab04) 
MR$-0.02 {I9} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=123.19 {I3}, I|g=13.1 {I13} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=15 {I4}:2.6:|<0.26 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.57:0.1:|?0.021:0.008 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=162.42 {I4}, I|g=1.0 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g<1 (1976Me06) 
$K:L2:L3=1.3 {I3}:0.08:|<0.08 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=182.07 {I4}, I|g=41.0 {I28} (1975VyZY); evaluators assume that uncertainty of 28 in 1975VyZY is a misprint 
$I|g=20 {I1}, scaled to 44.0 {I22} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$K:L1:L2:L3=8.8 {I20}:0.77:1.42:1.3 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.34:0.05:0.075:0.05 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=201.56 {I5}, I|g=5 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.5 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=1.0 {I3}, scaled to 2.2 {I7} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1976Me06, second in 1975VyZY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=261.85 {I2}, I|g=28.0 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=14.0 {I10}, scaled to 30.8 {I22} (1976Me06), which may be for 261.85|g+263.5|g doublet in 1975VyZY 
$K:L1:L2=5.4 {I10}:0.91:<0.1 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2=0.21:0.034:|?0.005 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=362.0 {I2}, I|g=11.2 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.52 {I10} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=361.53 {I25}, I|g=3.3 {I3} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.5|<|d|<+3.6 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), 1.6 {I+24-6} from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
$E|g=406.73 {I11}, I|g=15.7 {I19}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=406.71 {I15}, I|g=5.2 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.3|<|d|<+2.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |<0.11 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from Ice(L1)=1.8 and adopted mult. 
RI$|?0.23 from I(|g+ce), adopted mult and |d. Other: |<1.3 (1975VyZY) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.8:|?0.4:|?0.4 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=57.60 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
TI$from Ice(L)|?18 and assumed mult. 
$L1:L2:L3=9.0:|<4:|?7 (1975VyZY) 
$1975VyZY suggest mult=(E1) is inconsistent with this placement; note also that E|g fits poorly, with level-energy difference=57.89. Evaluators show tentative placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=199.12 {I5}, I|g=23.0 {I34} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=12 {I2} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=3.0 {I8}:0.31:0.52:0.44 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.14:0.02:0.03:0.02 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=298.6 {I1}, I|g=9.0 {I22} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=3.0 {I6}, scaled to 6.6 {I13} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1=0.63 {I12}:0.1 (1975VyZY) 
MR$-0.1|<|d|<+0.9 (1981Kr08); |a(K)exp inconsistent with pure M1 or pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=398.80 {I15}, I|g=11.2 {I12} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=398.94 {I30}, I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06, placed only from 677 level) 
$K:L1:L2=0.51 {I10}:0.08:<0.06 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1=0.023:0.0034 (1971Ab04) 
M$(M1+E2) for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.5 {I6} (1976Me06) scaled to 4.2 {I17} 
E$1976Me06 proposed alternative placement of 443.0|g from 569.4 level, which would be consistent only with mult(443.0|g)=E2 and J|p(569.4 level)=7/2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=133.84 {I3}, I|g=10.5 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=5.0 {I5} (1976Me06) 
$K:L2:L3=9 {I2}:|?0.08: <0.08 (1975VyZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=235.9 {I4}, I|g=22.7 {I30} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=9.2 {I10} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=2.0 {I4}:0.43:0.46:0.4 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=0.086:0.017:0.018:0.015 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=374.5 {I2}, I|g=8 {I3}, Ice(K)=0.26 {I6} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=374.90 {I20}, I|g=1.5 {I5}, scaled to 4.2 {I14} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06; 8 {I3} in 1975VyZY. 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1976Me06, second in 1975VyZY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$E|g=427.7 {I2}, I|g=5.7 {I11}, Ice(K)=0.16 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=427.32 {I15}, I|g=1.6 {I2} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.08|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.38 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). Other: |d=0.38 {I+9-10} from |a(K)exp. |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=494.8 {I2}, I|g=7.2 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.07 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=494.44 {I18}, I|g=1.7 {I3}, scaled to 4.8 {I14} (1976Me06, unplaced) 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=330.2 {I2}, I|g=4.0 {I12} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=330.58 {I30}, I|g=0.8 {I2}, scaled to 2.2 {I6} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=356.36 {I17}, I|g=7.9 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=356.12 {I15}, I|g=2.1 {I3}, scaled to 5.9 {I8} (1976Me06) 
M$first |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=539.7 {I2}, I|g=5.8 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.17 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=539.50 {I40}, I|g=2.2 {I3} (1976Me06) 
MR$-13.3|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.2 for first A{-2} if J(569)=7/2; -|@|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.5 for second A{-2} if J(569)=5/2; -4.16|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.02 for third A{-2} if J(569)=3/2 (1981Kr08). M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g. 
$Double placement suggested in 1981Kr08 only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=151.96 {I2}, I|g=5.8 {I17} (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=2.4 {I2}, scaled to 5.3 {I4} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1=3.9 {I8}:0.54 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1:L3=0.14:0.02:0.006 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=270.0 {I2}, I|g|?2 (1975VyZY) 
$I|g=1.0 {I1}, scaled to 2.20 {I22} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=392.75 {I15}, I|g=19.7 {I20} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=392.55 {I10}, I|g=6.0 {I6} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2=1.35 {I20}:0.34:<0.05 (1975VyZY) 
$K:L1=0.031:0.0057 (1971Ab04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
$E|g=445.65 {I8}, I|g=33 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.24 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=445.41 {I10}, I|g=10.5 {I17} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.01|<|d|<+0.70 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |<0.11 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=513.1 {I1}, I|g=50 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.38 {I10} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=513.30 {I80}, I|g=12.0 {I40} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1975VyZY; E|g=569.86 {I13} in 1976Me06 is possibly for a doublet. 
RI$I|g=16.9 {I30} for 570.0|g+570.7|g in 1975VyZY; 5.0 {I4} scaled to 14.0 {I11} in 1976Me06. From Ice(K)(570.0|g), |a(K)exp(570.0|g) (ruling out E1), and I|g(570.0)|>10 {I2} assuming |a(K)exp|<|a(K) (M1 theory), evaluators adopt I|g=14 {I6} for this component of the doublet, leaving I|g=3 {I7} for the 570.7|g. Alternatively, from Ice(K)(570.7|g), I|g(570.7)|<13 {I3} and |>2, respectively, assuming |a(K)exp|>|a(K)(E1) and |<|a(K)(M1). 
MR$-1.2|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.7 from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=594.6 {I2}, I|g=8.5 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.17 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=594.30 {I30}, I|g=3.2 {I5} (1976Me06) 
M$M1(+E2) for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of the two values 
$E|g=599.7 {I2}, I|g=16.0 {I27}, Ice(K)=0.36 {I6} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=599.00 {I20}, I|g=5.8 {I6}, scaled to 16.2 {I17} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=368.85 {I10}, I|g=6.2 {I20} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=368.61 {I20}, I|g=2.0 {I3}, scaled to 5.6 {I8} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
M$E2(+M1) for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=437.2 {I5}, I|g=3.0 {I9}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=437.84 {I20}, I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=464.4 {I2}, I|g=4.8 {I8}, Ice(K)=0.10 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=464.23 {I20}, I|g=1.9 {I3} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=677.4 {I2}, I|g=13 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.04 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=677.14 {I15}, I|g=3.0 {I4}, scaled to 8.4 {I11} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06, respectively 
$This |g placed by 1976Me06, 1977Gr21 (and 1981Kr08) from 677 and/or 1305 level(s); level scheme requires mult=M1,E2 for placement from 677 level and E1 from 1305 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=479.4 {I7}, I|g=3 {I1}, Ice(K)|?0.068 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=479.97 {I30}, I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06) 
$Placement of 479.88|g from 719 or 788 level in 1976Me06, whereas in 1976Gr06, only placed from 788 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) for doubly-placed |g. 
$Placement from 1981Kr08 only. 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21 placed 539.66|g from 569 level only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=689.8 {I2}, I|g=7.7 {I21}, Ice(K)|<0.03 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=688.85 {I50}, I|g=0.8 {I1}, scaled to 2.2 {I3} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$E|g=719.9 {I3}, I|g=6.8 {I6}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=719.74 {I25}, I|g=1.8 {I3} (1976Me06, unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
$E|g=470.8 {I2}, I|g=11 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.54 {I10} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=470.55 {I25}, I|g=3.2 {I5} (1976Me06) 
MR$+0.3|<|d|<+10.8 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |<0.31 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
$E|g=549.0 {I5}, I|g=5.6 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.11 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=549.00 {I30}, I|g=1.0 {I3}, scaled to 2.8 {I8} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
$E|g=609.5 {I2}, I|g=10.5 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.12 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=609.35 {I16}, I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06) 
MR$-|@<|d|<-0.4 or +2.1|<|d|<+|@ from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |>1.2 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
$E|g=709.9 {I2}, I|g=13.0 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.075 {I20} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=709.73 {I15}, I|g=3.6 {I5}, scaled to 10.1 {I14} (1976Me06) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.30 {I+50-27} or |>1.8 (magnitude of |d) from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); smaller |d not consistent with |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=788.5 {I2}, I|g=5.4 {I6}, Ice(K)=0.03 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=788.38 {I20}, I|g=2.0 {I5} (1976Me06) 
$|d(O/Q)=-0.25 {I+53-75} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=591.4 {I1}, I|g=22 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.25 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=591.19 {I13}, I|g=8.6 {I10} (1976Me06) 
MR$other: 2.5 +|@-10 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=964.0 {I2}, I|g=11.5 {I10}, Ice(K)|?0.023 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=963.61 {I15}, I|g=3.6 {I5} (1976Me06) 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=988.4 {I2}, I|g=27.4 {I17} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=988.40 {I10}, I|g=9.2 {I5} (1976Me06) 
MR$+0.3|<|d(Q/D)|<+12.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=855.9 {I4}, I|g=5.4 {I11}, Ice(K)|?0.034 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=855.70 {I40}, I|g=2.0 {I7} (1976Me06) 
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1188.6 {I1}, I|g=37.3 {I19}, Ice(K)=0.035 {I10} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1188.48 {I10}, I|g=12.9 {I6} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1267.4 {I2}, I|g=100 {I3}, Ice(K)=0.093 {I20} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1267.24 {I8}, I|g=36.1 {I25} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
$E|g=1126.8 {I2}, I|g=16.2 {I13}, Ice(K)=0.016 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1126.56 {I12}, I|g=5.6 {I5} (1976Me06) 
$|DJ=2 ruled out by |g(|q) which implies unrealistic 4.4% M3 admixture for |DJ=2, E2+M3 (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp inconsistent with |D|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1305.4 {I2}, I|g=20.6 {I16}, Ice(K)=0.012 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1305.48 {I12}, I|g=7.4 {I11} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.38 {I+12-9} or +6.4 {I+81-25} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d favors |D|p=no. E1 from |a(K)exp inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=784.8 {I2}, I|g=20 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.047 {I10} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=784.82 {I10}, I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06, unplaced) 
|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I5} implies mult=E1 and, hence, |p=+ for 1356 level. However, |p=- is favored by nuclear orientation for doubly-placed 595|g from 1951 level assuming it has |p=-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$E|g=642.2 {I2}, I|g=7.5 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=642.06 {I15}, I|g=2.5 {I3}, scaled to 7.0 {I8} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
MR$+0.3|<|d(Q/D)|<+9.4 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp for doubly-placed line, but level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=925.4 {I3}, I|g=1.8 {I6} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=925.15 {I35}, I|g=1.0 {I2}, scaled to 2.8 {I6} (1976Me06) 
RI$weighted average of the two values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1227.4 {I2}, I|g=37.5 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.020 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1227.22 {I20}, I|g=13.0 {I13} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D) (1981Kr08) favors |D|p=no; but E1 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1376.1 {I2}, I|g=19.1 {I11}, Ice(K)|?0.010 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1375.95 {I12}, I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06) 
MR$-2.0|<|d|<-0.4 from |g(|q), rules out |DJ=1, dipole transition (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d favors |D|p=no; E1 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1394.1 {I2}, I|g=15.5 {I11}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1394.04 {I17}, I|g=5.0 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.1|<|d|<+1.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1470.0 {I2}, I|g=9.9 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1469.89 {I43}, I|g=1.7 {I3}, scaled to 4.8 {I8} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1506.9 {I2}, I|g=78.3 {I45}, Ice(K)=0.04 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1506.83 {I8}, I|g=27.0 {I20} (1976Me06) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.18 {I7} or |>12.8 (magnitude of |d) from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1629.7 {I5}, I|g=10.0 {I14}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1629.70 {I70}, I|g=1.7 {I3}, scaled to 4.8 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$-4.6|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). First |a(K) exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-12.6|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.1 if 9/2 to 7/2; or -|@|<|d|<-0.8 if 9/2 to 9/2 (1981Kr08). 
$This placement affirmed by |g|g-coin (1975VyZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1397.7 {I2}, I|g=30.0 {I16}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1397.57 {I10}, I|g=10.5 {I10} (1976Me06) 
MR$-9.8|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.8 or |>4.6 (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d favors |D|p=no. However, E1 is favored from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
$E|g=1510.4 {I5}, I|g=21.5 {I24}, Ice(K)=0.013 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1510.39 {I15}, I|g=7.4 {I11} (1976Me06) 
MR$+0.47 {I+22-14} or +3.6 {I+15-33} (1981Kr08); |d favors |D|p=no. However, E1 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1633.9 {I3}, I|g=35.5 {I32}, Ice(K)=0.015 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1633.64 {I15}, I|g=10.5 {I10}, scaled to 29.4 {I28} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 
MR$+0.04 {I12} or +7.9 {I+39-872} (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1951.6 {I2}, I|g=15.0 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1951.36 {I20}, I|g=5.0 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.6|<|d(O/Q)|<+6.6 (1981Kr08). E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
$E|g=1164.3 {I3}, I|g=10.2 {I10}, Ice(K)|<0.02 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1164.16 {I20}, I|g=3.1 {I5} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.1|<|d|<+48.2 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), with 7/2 to 7/2 transition ruled out; |<0.4 from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
$E|g=1275.4 {I2}, I|g=18.8 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.012 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1275.35 {I30}, I|g=6.0 {I9} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.2|<|d|<+1.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), while excluding 7/2 to 5/2 or 3/2; |<0.1 from |a(K)exp 
$An alternative 7/2- to 5/2+ placement from the 1306 level is rejected by 1981Kr08 because, for that, |d=0.47 {I+4-2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1541.9 {I2}, I|g=19.0 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1541.96 {I15}, I|g=6.1 {I6} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.34 {I+37-44} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1644.3 {I3}, I|g=45.4 {I28}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1644.51 {I11}, I|g=13.6 {I13}, scaled to 38.1 {I37} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.23 {I20} (1981Kr08), ruling out |DJ=1, dipole. |a(K)exp consistent with E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1675.8 {I4}, I|g=14.0 {I12}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1675.35 {I40}, I|g=3.3 {I6}, scaled to 9.2 {I17} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1713.6 {I3}, I|g=24.6 {I12}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1713.62 {I15}, I|g=7.2 {I9} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1873.0 {I2}, I|g=10.5 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.007 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1873.15 {I46}, I|g=2.3 {I4}, scaled to 6.4 {I11} (1976Me06) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=|?4:0.34:4.56:4.7:0.09:1.37:1.48 (1971Ab04) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 
MR$-0.1|<|d(Q/D)|<+1.3 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 
E$poor fit in the decay scheme, with level-energy difference=1873.97 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1976Me06. 1894.4|g in 1975VyZY with I|g=35.7 {I14} and Ice(K)|?0.01 is most likely a doublet corresponding to 1893.30|g and 1895.38|g in 1976Me06 
$I|g=3.0 {I10}, scaled to 8.4 {I28} (1976Me06). 
E$poor fit in the decay scheme, with level-energy difference=1894.11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1555.3 {I6}, I|g=5.2 {I12} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1554.50 {I35}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1976Me06) 
MR$-4.2|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.2 for first A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 or -2.5|<|d(O/Q)|<+0.1 for second A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2 (1981Kr08); doubly-placed line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1665.2 {I3}, I|g=20.9 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1665.60 {I20}, I|g=4.5 {I7}, scaled to 12.6 {I20} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.01 {I+26-20} for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2; |d(Q/D)=+0.7 {I+4-12} for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 (1981Kr08); E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1697.1 {I7}, I|g=7.6 {I28} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1696.10 {I34}, I|g=3.0 {I5}, scaled to 8.4 {I14} (1976Me06) 
E$alternative placements from 2013 level (in 1976Me06) and from 1998 level (in 1976Gr06) are ruled out by |g|g-coin and |g(|q) data in 1981Kr08; consequently, all I(1696|g) is assigned from 1974 level 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.07 {I+51-38} or +1.9 {I+20-11} for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2; |d(Q/D)=+0.40 {I+26-18} or +5.8 {I+119-33} for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1976Me06. 1894.4|g in 1975VyZY with I|g=35.7 {I14} and Ice(K)|?0.01 is most likely a doublet corresponding to 1893.30|g and 1895.38|g in 1976Me06 
$I|g=6.0 {I10} scaled to 16.8 {I28} (1976Me06). 
MR$-1.9|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.4 for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2; -0.2|<|d(Q/D)|<+1.5 for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1973.8 {I2}, I|g=38.5 {I17}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I4} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1973.96 {I14}, I|g=13.4 {I13} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.02 {I13} or +1.7 {I+6-4} for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2; |d(Q/D)=+0.45 {I12} or +4.7 {I+34-15} for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2; doubly-placed line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1255.8 {I3}, I|g=8.2 {I9}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1255.37 {I20}, I|g=3.3 {I5} (1976Me06) 
$Placed by 1981Kr08 from 1974 level also, but E|g does not fit that placement. 
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I28}; |a(K)exp |< 0.00135 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1534.8 {I3}, I|g=13 {I1} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1534.59 {I21}, I|g=4.8 {I7} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.25 {I+21-18} if 9/2 to 7/2 transition for a doubly-placed |g (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1941.1 {I2}, I|g=44.5 {I32}, Ice(K)=0.036 {I19} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1941.40 {I12}, I|g=14.7 {I15} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.08 {I16} or |>4.0 (magnitude of |d) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=673.9 {I4}, I|g=6.7 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.04 {I2} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=673.88 {I25}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1976Me06) 
$|a(K)exp consistent with E2(+M1) or E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1548.4 {I2}, I|g=18.0 {I19}, Ice(K)=0.020 {I6} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1548.44 {I15}, I|g=6.8 {I7} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.28 {I44} (1981Kr08); |a(K)exp favors E2 over E1, contrary to |D|p=(yes) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=1740.7 {I3}, I|g=12.9 {I45}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1740.33 {I27}, I|g=3.4 {I6}, scaled to 9.5 {I17} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06 
MR$+0.5|<|d|<+4.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). |a(K)exp based on I|g from 1976Me06 allows E1 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1979.5 {I2}, I|g=28.3 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.013 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1979.58 {I15}, I|g=10.4 {I10} (1976Me06) 
E,RI$alternative placement from 2013 to 7/2+ 33 level, proposed by 1976Me06, is ruled out by coincidence and nuclear orientation data (1981Kr08); hence, all I(1980|g) is assigned to the 1980-level placement. 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.60 {I+25-15} or +2.9 {I+16-11} (1981Kr08), favors |D|p=no, as required by level scheme; however, |a(K)exp favors E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1936.5 {I3}, I|g=17 {I5}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I6} for 1933.5|g+1936.5|g (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1936.88 {I20}, I|g=5.6 {I8}, scaled to 15.7 {I22} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=1961.4 {I2}, I|g=25.5 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I6} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1961.43 {I15}, I|g=8.5 {I12} (1976Me06) 
MR$|a(K)exp implies E1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
MR$-0.3|<|d|<+9.8 if J(1356)=7/2; -0.3|<|d|<+1.6 if J(1356)=9/2 (1981Kr08); |a(K)exp gives M1(+E2); multiply-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1426.8 {I2}, I|g=25.4 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.015 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1426.82 {I12}, I|g=8.0 {I12} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.25 {I+12-15} or -3.0 {I+10-19} (1981Kr08), |a(K)exp implies E1(+M2); lower |d preferred by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1445.0 {I4}, I|g=8.3 {I12}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1444.87 {I27}, I|g=2.4 {I4} (1976Me06) 
MR$-0.3|<|d|<+1.7 (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1521.7 {I3}, I|g=12.0 {I34}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1521.41 {I23}, I|g=3.4 {I5}, scaled to 9.5 {I14} (1976Me06) 
RI$from 1976Me06 
MR$+0.3|<|d|<+0.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d in favors |D|p=no but |a(K)exp and level scheme favor |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1578.7 {I2}, I|g=13.6 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I3} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1578.86 {I15}, I|g=3.9 {I6} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06; implied mult=E1 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1680.8 {I3}, I|g=20.8 {I14}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1680.81 {I25}, I|g=4.0 {I6}, scaled to 11.2 {I17} (1976Me06) 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1720.2 {I4}, I|g=4.7 {I6} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1719.76 {I70}, I|g=1.0 {I2}, scaled to 2.8 {I6} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1758.8 {I2}, I|g=10.8 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1759.59 {I38}, I|g=2.2 {I3}, scaled to 6.2 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$0.0|<|d=+47.0 (1981Kr08) for doubly-placed |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1964.7 {I2}, I|g=12 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.013 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1664.81 {I23}, I|g=4.2 {I6} (1976Me06) 
MR$-2.6|<|d|<+0.2 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); D or E2 from |a(K) exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-0.32 {I40} or +1.6 {I+24-9} for first A{-2} if J(2012)=9/2; -0.28 {I+25-35} or -2.6 {I+14-52} if J(2012)=7/2 for second A{-2}; doubly-placed |g (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1833.2 {I3}, I|g=10.5 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1833.38 {I28}, I|g=2.9 {I4} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.30 {I+32-29} or +1.5 {I+13-7} for first A{-2} if J(2012)=9/2; -0.31 {I+22-46} or -2.4 {I+13-26} for second A{-2} if J(2012)=7/2 (1981Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1933.5 {I3}, I|g=15.0 {I30}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I6} for 1933.5|g+1936.5|g (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1933.70 {I23}, I|g=5.0 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$+0.4|<|d|<+5.9 for first A{-2}, |D|p=(no) if J(2012)=9/2; -0.09|<|d(Q/D)=+1.33 for second A{-2} if J(2012)=7/2 (1981Kr08). |DJ|=2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1983.2 {I10}, I|g=7.5 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1983.35 {I32}, I|g=2.6 {I4} (1976Me06) 
MR$-6.8|<|d|<+0.1 (1981Kr08); |DJ=1 transition if |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=2012.9 {I2}, I|g=39.0 {I18} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=2013.12 {I15}, I|g=13.4 {I13} (1976Me06) 
$|d(Q/D)=+0.32 {I9} or +9.6 {I+225-42} (1981Kr08); favors |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1735.3 {I3}, I|g=19.2 {I13}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1735.31{I25}, I|g=4.6 {I7}, scaled to 12.9 {I20} (1976Me06) 
$First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06, favoring E1 in the first case and E2 in the second, but |D|p=(no) from level scheme 
MR$+0.4|<|d|<+4.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1752.8 {I3}, I|g=5.4 {I15} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1752.30 {I70}, I|g=0.8 {I2}, scaled to 2.2 {I6} (1976Me06). 
E$poor fit in the decay scheme, with level-energy difference=1751.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1926.2 {I2}, I|g=9.7 {I9} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1926.76 {I18}, I|g=2.9 {I4} (1976Me06) 
MR$-4.4|<|d|<-0.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=+0.40 {I8} or +4.7 {I+24-14} (1981Kr08) for a doubly-placed |g; |a(K)exp giving E1 is inconsistent with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=1701.8 {I4}, I|g=5.1 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1701.80 {I50}, I|g=1.5 {I3} (1976Me06) 
$+0.3|<|d|<+9.6 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1889.9 {I2}, I|g=14.3 {I8} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1889.79 {I35}, I|g=2.0 {I5}, scaled to 5.6 {I14} (1976Me06) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.25 {I25} or |>2.1 (1981Kr08). 
$Designation as M1+E2 transition in 1981Kr08 seems a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1899.5 {I2}, I|g=14.3 {I19} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=1899.95 {I25}, I|g=3.0 {I5}, scaled to 8.4 {I14} (1976Me06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=2204.3 {I2}, I|g=7.3 {I5} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=2204.43 {I30}, I|g=1.8 {I3}, scaled to 5.0 {I8} (1976Me06) 
MR$+0.2|<|d|<+11.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=2271.5 {I5}, I|g=24.0 {I12} (1975VyZY) 
$E|g=2271.86 {I20}, I|g=7.2 {I7} (1976Me06) 
MR$+0.2|<|d|<+0.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), magnitude(|d) favors |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$obtained by 1982Ro08 from intensity balance at 186 level, assuming that the 60|g is pure M1. For E2, evaluators estimate I|g|>4.9 based on I(|g+ce)(60|g)|>117 {I18} and |a(E2)=24.8. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average from (p,2n|g), |e decay (5.5 min) and |e decay (6.7 min). 
M from K/L in (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.) deduced from B(E2)|^=0.050 {I5} for 1233.2 level (Coulomb excitation, 1982Ro07) and B(E2)(single particle)=0.0275. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; |g unobserved but must exist. 
BE3W,M From observed B(E3)|^=0.22 {I4} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; |g unobserved but must exist. 
BE3W,M From observed B(E3)|^=0.09 {I2} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI from |e decay (5.5 min). Placement shown as tentative because similar E|g is placed instead from 2428 level in |e decay (6.7 min), and |g is absent in (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 33 {I6} in |e decay (5.5 min), but line may Be complex there. |g is absent in (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from |e decay (6.7 min). E|g also fits a 1973 to 585 placement (see 1972Ch44), but 1999Ba65, in |e decay (6.7 min), placed it from 1674 level only, even though they observed a 1973 level; I(123|g)/I(1387|g)=0.14 {I3} and 0.18 {I4} in the respective studies, allows a single placement, but this placement alone is not consistent with |g|g coin data (1970Ch28) in 5.5-min decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I(979|g):I(781|g)=177 {I15}:37 {I4} (1970Ch28). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I5} (1970Ch28) for 984|g+979|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?0.0012 (1970Ch28). 
I(1364|g):I(1165|g):I(467|g):I(385|g)=38 {I4}:10.2 {I15}:9.0 {I15}:19.5 {I20} (1970Ch28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I9} (1970Ch28) for 1257|g+1265|g (where I(1257|g):I(1265|g)=15 {I2}:32 {I3}); this favors mult=M1,E2 but does not rule out E1 for one of the transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<0.0018 (1970Ch28) consistent with E1 or E2. 
I(1463|g):I(1265|g):I(380|g):I(100|g)=21 {I3}:32 {I3}:10.9 {I17}:4.8 {I10} (1970Ch28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
I(1510|g):I(1311|g):I(1013|g)=4.4 {I10}:33 {I3}:7.1 {I10} (1970Ch28), or 12 {I4}:7 {I2}:12 {I2} (for doublet) in 1970Ar16; note that branching from 1970Ch28 disagrees with that adopted from |e decay (6.7 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Tentatively placed in accord with Adopted Levels. From I(123|g) and adopted branching from 1674 level, I(223|g)|?3.5 is expected here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
May be same |g ray as the E|g=372.17 line placed instead from a 2428 level in |e decay (6.7 min); consequently, placement is shown as tentative here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI I(1089|g)/I(123|g) here is much larger than in 6.7-min decay; 1970Ch28 did not report a 1091.6|g known in 6.5-min decay, so possibly the 1089.3|g of 1970Ch28 is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E for doubly-placed |g. 
M |a(K)exp<0.0016 (1970Ch28) for doublet dominated by this transition. 
RI see comment on 1388|g from 1973 level. 
I(1388|g from 1674):I(1089|g):I(372|g):I(123|g)= 27 {I8}:9.0 {I17}:5.3 {I9}:4.8 {I9} (1970Ch28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E for |g which may be a doublet. 
RI I(1388|g)=35 {I3} for doubly-placed |g. Based on adopted I(123|g)/I(1388|g from 1674 level)=0.18 {I3} and I(123|g)=4.8 {I9} here, I(1388|g)=27 {I8} from 1674 level, leaving I|g=8 {I8} to be placed from this level. |g is coincident with 112|g, absent in 6.7-min |e decay. 
M |a(K)exp<0.0016 (1970Ch28) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.25 {I5} (1970Ch28) for 229|g+223|g doublet in which the 229|g is the stronger component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=71 {I8} for |g that was also placed from the 1651 level in 1972Ch44. The 1651 level was observed in |e decay (6.7 min) also, but the 348.3|g was not (see 1999Ba65). If I(348|g)<I(479|g) (=10.0 {I15}) from 1651 level, 61<I(348|g from 1999 level)<71 {I8}, so the evaluator assigns I|g|?66 here. 
M |a(K)exp=0.036 {I9} (1970Ch28) for doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI probably includes small component (|?3.4) from 223|g from 1674 level (see comment on that transition). 
M |a(K)exp=0.25 {I5} (1970Ch28) for 229|g+223|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I5} (1970Ch28) for 984|g+979|g. 
%I|g=12.9 {I25} assuming adopted normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp>0.075 deduced from Ice(K)|?0.03 and detection limit (=0.4) for 1156-keV photons (1970Ch28); I(|g+ce)(1156|g) is insignificant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?0.03 (1970Ch28). 
Contribution to I(|g+ce) from E0 portion insignificant (Ice(K)|?0.06 cf. I|g|?2 in 1970Ch28). E=1146.0 in 1970Ch28. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?0.04 (1970Ch28). 
Contribution to I(|g+ce) from E0 component insignificant (Ice(K)|?0.08 cf. I|g|?2 in 1970Ch28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?0.011 (1970Ch28). 
E weighted average of 1012.9 {I3} (1970Ch28) and 1013.0 {I6} (1999Ba65). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Evaluator assigns placement as uncertain because |g is very weak and a 1686|g appears to deexcite a separate level in 5.5-min |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.013 {I6} implies M1 admixture (|a(K)(M1)=0.014, |a(K)(E2)=0.0059); however, M1 is not consistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1(+E2)]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR from intensity balance at 2405 level, I(|g+ce)(24|g)|<192 {I13}, so |a(exp)(24|g)|<319 at 68% confidence level; this implies |d(M1,E2)<0.39. [|a(M1)=36.6, |a(E2)=2242, |a(E1)=3.11.] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I9} (1970Ch28) for 1257|g+1265|g (where I(1257|g):I(1265|g)=15 {I2}:32 {I3}); this favors mult=M1,E2 but does not rule out E1 for one of the transitions. 
Other I|g: 9 {I2} (1970Ch28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M K:L:M= |?45:6.5:1.9 (1966Gr04); K(1197) corrected by evaluator for I(ce)|?2 contribution from L(1145) which overlaps it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=99 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.41 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}, I(30|')/I(90|')=0.97 {I2} (1985Ba47). A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g). A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1972Mo44). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=100 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.265 {I26}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I3}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.00 {I2} (1985Ba47). A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g). A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} (1972Mo44). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI combined value for 384.3|g and 384.8|g. 
I|g=113 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for doublet. 
M A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g). A{-2}=+0.37 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I7} (1972Mo44). Not M2 from RUL. 
A{-2}=+0.251 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.105 {I26}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.11 {I2} (1985Ba47) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI for 1018|g+1016|g doublet. 
I|g=3 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.58 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I17}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.36 {I10} (1985Ba47) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=91 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.17 {I2} (1985Ba47). A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g). A{-2}=+0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1972Mo44). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=7 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for doublet. 
M A{-2}=-0.26 {I15}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.09 {I10} (1985Ba47) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI combined value for 510.5|g and 511.0|g (1995Fi01). 
I|g=104 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for doublet. 
M I(30|')/I(90|')=1.000 {I2} (1985Ba47) for doublet (reported uncertainty possibly a misprint of 0.02). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
I|g=2 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=-0.56 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I3}, I(30|')/I(90|')=0.75 {I9} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI for 553|g doublet (1995Fi01). 
I|g=93 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g); not M2 from RUL. 
A{-2}=+0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.25 {I2} (1985Ba47) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
I|g=8 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=-0.22 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I20}, I(30|')/I(90|')=0.98 {I18} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=53 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.10 {I2} (1985Ba47). A{-2}=+0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
I|g=8 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=-0.15 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I24}, I(30|')/I(90|')=0.78 {I4} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=39 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.27 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I9}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.13 {I8} (1985Ba47). A{-2}=+0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I6} (1972Jo02) from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
I|g=9 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.51 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.34 {I17}, I(30|')/I(90|')=0.78 {I9} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=48 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.13 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.16 {I2} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=6 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for 597.6|g and 597.7|g. 
M I(30|')/I(90|')=1.12 {I13} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 630.5 in 1993Ol02. 
I|g=7 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=-0.25 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I10}, I(30|')/I(90|')=0.56 {I4} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=20 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M A{-2}=+0.26 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I15}, I(30|')/I(90|')=1.13 {I3} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI the reported value and its precision appear to be far too high, suggesting a typographical error; possibly 8.8 {I2} was intended. 
I|g=12 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47). 
M I(30|')/I(90|')=1.23 {I12} (1985Ba47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI for 826.2|g+826.5|g+828.5|g multiplet. 
I|g=15 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for contaminated |g. 
M I(30|')/I(90|')=0.99 {I3} (1985Ba47) for contaminated |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=24 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for possible doublet. 
M I(30|')/I(90|')=1.25 {I5} (1985Ba47) for possible doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI combined value for 891.4|g and 893.0|g. 
I|g=14 for E({+48}Ca)=201 MeV (1985Ba47) for doublet. 
M I(30|')/I(90|')=0.95 {I6} (1985Ba47) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$according to e-mail reply of Feb 4, 2016 from S. Pascu, this |g feeds the 585 level rather than the 286 level as shown in 2015Pa14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$other: 309 {I28} from author's adopted T{-1/2} of 84 ps {I7}, which combines their result with T{-1/2}=89 ps {I9} from 2015Pa14 (Phys Rev C 91, 034321). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR -0.058 {I9} from nuclear orientation (1982Da23) in |e decay; <0.041 from |a(K)exp=0.049 {I8} (weighted average of 0.046 {I10} from |e decay and 0.052 {I12} from (n,|g) E=thermal). B(M2)(W.u.)|<1.0 (from RUL) implies |d|<0.033, so evaluator adopts |d=-0.017 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E for doublet dominated by this transition. 
RI divided intensity from |e decay (34.06 h). 
M,MR M1+E2, |d=1.1 {I3} from |a(K)exp in |e decay for doublet dominated by this transition; other component is known from (n,|g) to have |a(K)exp>|a(K)(M1) so mult=E2(+M1) is likely for this transition. An M1 component is inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
Transition not seen in {+168}Yb(n,|g) E=thermal, but would be expected, if placement in {+169}Lu |e decay (34.06 h) were correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,CC |d(M1,E2)=-0.74 {I+11-13} or +10 {I+50-5} and q(E0/E2)=5.8 {I+8-7} or 3.57 {I14} from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Large |a(K)exp, suggesting probable E0 component for doubly-placed |g, probably results from the alternative placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp in (n,|g) E=thermal suggests M1 multipolarity, inconsistent with this placement, but line appears to Be complex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ba09. 
TI from intensity balance at 24.2 level; |e+|b{++} feeding to this level is not expected (|DJ=3, |D|p=yes). 
M from ce subshell ratios: L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5):N:O=|<50:500 50:600 {I50}:<8:140 {I15}:160 {I15}:29 {I3}:71 {I7}:6 {I2} (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=6.4 {I9} (1978Ba73), 7.2 {I11} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 1220 {I150}:170 {I20}:80 {I15}:50 {I10}:37 {I7}:19 {I3}:11.5 {I20} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3=100:46.9 {I13}:34.4 {I7} (1987BaZB). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(L)exp=4.7 {I3} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N= 75 {I7}:130 {I15}:130 {I10}:|?20:|?40:|?40:19 {I2} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3=100:161 {I5}:164 {I5} (1987BaZB). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1973Bo38. 
RI deduced from Ice(L)=19.3 {I43} (1977Ar17) and |a(L)(theory). 
M from ce subshell ratios: L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2:O= 350 {I100}:60 {I15}:55 {I25}:70 {I16}:12 {I2}:10 {I3}:17 {I3}:3 {I1}:3.3 {I10} (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38,1977Ar17). 
|a(K)exp=1.4 {I3} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O= 50 {I9}:5.0:83:85:1.33:26.6:26.6:13.3:3.3 (1973Bo38); K:L1:L2:L3=|<50:5.5 {I5}:95 {I3}:100 (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR sign from nuclear orientation (|d=-0.3 {I+3-6}, 1982Da23); |d<0 supported by |d=-0.40 {I9} from {+167}Er(|a,2n|g)). 
|a(K)exp=3.0 {I3} (1978Ba73), 3.0 {I6} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N:O= 66 {I11}:10:2.5:<0.83:2.5:0.66:0.83:0.17 (1973Bo38); K:L1:L2:L3=190 {I15}:27 {I2}:8.1 {I10}:4.5 {I7} (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38). 
|a(K)exp=0.38 {I10} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N= 76 {I16}:6.6:20:15:1.7:5:3.3:2.5 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=3.63 {I8} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N= 133 {I20}:16.6:3.3:<0.66:5.0:0.83:1.33 (1973Bo38); K:L1:L2=240 {I30}:31 {I4}:4.3 {I15} (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios (1977Ar17). 
|a(K)exp=2.0 {I4} (1978Ba73), 1.9 {I3} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:M= 140 {I10}:18.3 {I14}:1.7 {I3}:|?4.6 (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N:O= 108 {I20}:19.9:2.0:0.20:6.64:0.66:1.66:0.50 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.046 {I10} (1978Ba73) and K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O= 108 {I20}:18.6:2.7:2.7:5:0.7:0.7:0.15:0.35 (1973Bo38). |a(K)exp=0.59 {I9} (1977Ar17) is presumed to be erroneous. 
MR -0.058 {I9} from nuclear orientation (1982Da23) but <0.042 from |a(K)exp=0.046 {I10} (1978Ba73). B(M2)(W.u.)|<1.0 (from RUL) implies |d|<0.033, so evaluator adopts |d=-0.017 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Other |d: 0.42 {I3} (ce subshell ratios, 1987BaZB). 
|a(K)exp=0.80 {I15} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N= 515 {I90}:73:11.6:5:18.3:3.3:5.0 (1973Bo38); L1:L2:L3=100:27.0 {I22}:16.7 {I22} (1987BaZB). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38). 
|a(K)exp=0.28 {I5} (1978Ba73), 0.30 {I4} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O= 432 {I83}:50:99.6:66.4:11.6:2.5:16.6:13.3:3.3 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E from 1973Bo38. 
RI deduced from Ice(M1)=0.33 {I6} (1977Ar17) and |a(M1)(theory). 
M from ce subshell ratios (1977Ar17); M1+E2 with |d<0.055 (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23). 
L1:M1:M2=36 {I6}:8.0 {I13}: |<1.6 (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38). 
|a(K)exp=0.24 {I5} (1978Ba73), 0.28 {I4} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O= 531 {I90}:55:222:178:13.3:56.4:50:25.0:6.6 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR sign from Adopted Gammas. 
|a(K)exp=1.6 {I3} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N= 150 {I23}:23.2:8.3:2.3:6.6:1.7:1.7 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.032 {I15}, deduced from I|g and I(ce(K))=0.0058 {I25} (1978Ba73); inconsistent with |a(K)(theory)=0.168 for required E2 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from 1973Bo38. 
I(|g+ce)(14.2|g) cannot exceed 0.9 {I9} and I(|g+ce)(34.8|g) cannot exceed 1.5 {I7} based on intensity balances at the 243.8 and 264.3 levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E from 1973Bo38. 
TI See comment with 14.2|g. 
M from ce subshell ratios (1977Ar17). 
L1:L2=11.6 {I13}:|?1.2 (1977Ar17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR sign from |d=-0.14 {I+7-24} from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu24). 
|a(K)exp=3.5 {I5} (1978Ba73), 4.0 {I5} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 1050 {I100}:160 {I12}:32 {I3}:24 {I3}:32 {I3}:8.7 {I7}:5.7 {I10} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3=100:21.3 {I9}:16.4 {I5} (1987BaZB). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR other values: -0.28 {I+9-8} (|g|g(|q), 1980Bu24), -0.11 {I+16-25} (from {+167}Er(|a,2n|g)). 
|a(K)exp=1.55 {I25} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O= 32 {I5}:4.2:0.75:0.22:1.0:0.18:0.07:0.25:0.066 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |d=+0.03 {I21} (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests possible M2 admixture. 
|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2} (1978Ba73). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from Adopted Gammas; other value: -0.02 {I22} (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23). 
|a(K)exp=1.3 {I2} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N= 300 {I50}:36:6.6:1.3:8.3:1.7:2.5 (1973Bo38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR sign from |d=-0.17 {I+6-8} from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu24). Other |d: +0.10 {I9} (1982Da23, nuclear orientation). 
|a(K)exp=0.18 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g=2.33 {I13} and requirement that I(470|g from 570 level)/I(379|g) and I(470|g from 749 level)/I(360|g) should be identical in |e decay and (n,|g) E=thermal. 
|a(K)exp=0.042 {I10} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g=0.533 {I16} and I|g=0.115 {I26} for 659.6-level placement. 
M,MR M1+E2, |d=1.1 {I3} from |a(K)exp=0.021 {I2} for doublet dominated by this transition; other component is known from (n,|g) to have |a(K)exp>|a(K)(M1) so mult=E2(+M1) is likely for this transition. An M1 component would be inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E from Adopted Gammas. 
RI deduced from I|g(635.4|g+636.1|g)=2.72 {I9} and I|g(636.1|g)=2.1 {I7}. 
|a(K)exp>0.03 from I(ce(K)) (1978Ba73) and I|g here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp consistent with pure M1; -0.10|<|d|<+2.07 (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture. 
|a(K)exp=0.022 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp|>0.028 {I9}. 
For 505.4|g+502.8|g; component from 1463 level, suggested by 1978Ba73, very weak. Relative branchings from 749 level in {+168}Yb(n,|g) E=thermal imply more than I|g=0.59 intensity here from this level if all I|g for a 505.4|g in that data set deexcites the 749 level and evaluator presumes that the 504|g is a doublet in that reaction. 
RI combined value for 502.8|g+505.4|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from Adopted Gammas. E|g=761.35 {I3} in 1978Ba73. 
RI deduced from I|g(761.0|g+761.9|g)=3.11 {I26} and I|g(761.9|g)=2.2 {I4}. 
|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I10} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Alternative placement from 1177 level, as suggested by 1980Ba07 and 1993Dz02, not likely. Relative branchings from 920 level in {+168}Yb(n,|g) E=thermal require more than I|g=0.20 here. 
|a(K)exp=0.043 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M E1 for 889.8|g and 960.6|g established by low |a(K)exp from preliminary normalization. Adopted normalization of 1978Ba73 assumes pure E1 for both. 1982Da23 report |d=+0.018 {I29} for 889.8|g (nuclear orientation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC estimated from |a(K)exp. 
TI deduced from I|g, |a(K)exp, and K/L ratios for E0 transitions (1969Ha61)). 
M,CC from |a(K)exp=0.0367 {I26} (1978Ba73) and nuclear orientation (1982Da23). 1982Da23 report two solutions for |d(M1,E2) (-0.74 {I+11-13}, +10 {I+50-5}), and combining these with |a(K)exp, one can deduce q(E0/E2)=5.8 {I+8-7} or 3.57 {I14}, respectively, and |a=0.042 if |W(E0,K):|W(E0,L1):|W(E0,L2)=1.14:0.164:0.0047. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g=0.39 {I7} for 247.2|g+247.8|g, separate Ice components for doublet (1978Ba73), and known E2 multipolarity for 247.8|g. 
|a(K)exp=0.16 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g(520|g)=0.293 {I25} and I|g=0.080 {I15} for 591-level placement. 
|a(K)exp=0.0096 {I28} for doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Alternative placement from 1716.1 level, as suggested by 1978Ba73 and 1993Dz02, not likely. 1980Ba07 assign all intensity to this 1168-level placement on basis of ce|g coin data. 
|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |d=-0.21 {I+13-17} (if J(1177.0 level)=7/2) or |d=-0.41 {I22} (if J=9/2) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture. 
|a(K)exp=0.0053 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(272.1|g+272.7|g)=0.37 {I6} and I|g(272.1|g)=0.12 {I4}. 
|a(K)exp=0.017 {I9} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |d=-0.7 {I+2-10} (if J(1444.7 level)=7/2) or |d=+0.88 {I24} or -0.02 {I+16-11} (if J=9/2) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture. 
|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=6.8|*10{+-4} {I11} for doublet. 
RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g for each placement; I|g=13.6 {I3} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I4} favors mult=E2, inconsistent with this placement. Consequently, the evaluator shows the placement as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M -0.65|<|d|<+3.30 (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests little, if any, M1 admixture. 
|a(K)exp=0.0017 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g for each placement; I|g(exp)=5.56 {I12} for doublet. 
|a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M restricted to M1+E2 by |a(K)exp and two |d values (both large) (+10 {I+18-4} (if J(1707.8 level)=7/2 or -2.8 {I+15-158} (if J=9/2)) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23). 
|a(K)exp=9|*10{+-4} {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g for each placement; I|g(exp)=1.86 {I26} for doublet. 
|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I4} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g for each placement; I|g(exp)=3.02 {I8} for doublet. 
|a(K)exp=8.9|*10{+-4} {I33}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Multipolarity cannot be determined with available data (|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I6}; |d=+0.03 {I+10-8} or +1.03 {I18} from nuclear orientation (1982Da23)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Alternative placement from 1716 level, as suggested by 1978Ba73, not likely. Additional intensity to 832 level would make intensity balance there negative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |d=-0.8 {I+2-4} (if J(1954.6 level)=5/2) or |d=0.00 {I7} (if J=7/2) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture. 
|a(K)exp=0.0021 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I3} for doublet. 
RI 1970Se15 attribute remaining portion (I|g=55) of total I|g (=81.5) to {+168}Yb. 
M angular distribution data are consistent with Q, but no assignment is made because of complexity of peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) data are consistent with Q, but no assignment is made because of complexity of peak. A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} for triplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
1970Se15 indicate this placement as questionable; evaluator assigns all intensity to 191.0 level placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$estimated from level intensity balances; 1970Se15 attribute remaining portion (I|g=30) of total I|g (=44.8) to {+168}Yb. 
M A{-2}=+0.32 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I4} for contaminated line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g=19.3 {I27} and requirement that I(470|g from 570 level)/I(379|g) and I(470|g from 749 level)/I(360|g) should each be identical in |e decay and (n,|g) E=thermal. 
|a(K)exp=0.043 {I12} (for 470.6|g doublet and 470.8|g combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement proposed by 1988DzZW but not adopted; E|g somewhat too low. In table in 1988DzZW, |g deexcites only the 707 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E placement is doubtful because stronger branches expected from the 1078 level are not observed in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI far too strong relative to 1448|g based on Adopted Gammas; possibly the 926|g is complex in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placed by 1988DzZW from the 1696 level also, but that placement would require an M3 transition so is rejected by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/ce=0.87 
I(ce(K))/I(1145|g)=0.0027 from {+170}Lu |e decay. 
|r{+2}(E0)=0.027 {I5} (evaluation in 1999Wo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
I|g: unweighted average of 8.0 {I8} and 18.7 {I13} from (|a,4n|g) and (|a,2n|g), respectively. 
MR -0.42 {I7} or -1.63 {I20} from (|a,2n|g). 
CC for range of |d allowed by |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); |d larger than typical for E1+M2. 
MR -0.41 {I5} or -1.75 {I15} from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 10.2 {I17} in (|a,2n|g). 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); |d larger than typical for E1+M2. 
MR -0.37 {I7} or -1.95 {I25} from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 28.3 {I22} in (|a,2n|g). 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); |d larger than typical for E1+M2. 
MR -0.51 {I6} or -1.50 {I20} from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 50 {I17} from (|a,4n|g) and 55 {I9} from (|a,2n|g). 
M D+Q from (|a,2n|g); |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI 35 {I12} for |g possibly contaminated by {+27}Al(n,n'|g) line in (|a,2n|g); however, I|g=110 {I10} from (|a,4n|g). Reason for discrepancy has not been identified. 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp in (|a,2n|g), Q from DCO ratio in (|a,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M stretched Q from DCO in (|a,4n|g); |a(K)exp(1087 doublet) in (|a,2n|g) consistent with E1+E2 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M two |a(K)exp measurements in |e decay are mutually inconsistent; they imply mult=E1 (1988DzZW) or M1 (1972Ca21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M E2 or E1+M2 (|d=0.28 {I+6-7}) from |a(K)exp in |e decay; |D|p=yes from level scheme. Mixed multipolarity inconsistent with level scheme if J(2820)=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M M1+E2 from |a(K)exp in |e decay; mixed multipolarity inconsistent with level scheme if J(2820)=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp in |e decay favors mult=M1, but large uncertainty may render result unreliable. Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp in |e decay exceeds |a(K)(M1) significantly; level scheme inconsistent with M1+E0 or M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E recommended value from evaluation by 2000He14. Others: 84.25523 {I8} (1979Ke04), 84.2551 {I3} (1979He19) (relative to different standard). 
I|g(84|g)=2.48% {I6} (weighted average of 2.37 {I4} (1990Ke01), 2.56 {I4} (1988KuZM; presumably supersedes 2.56 {I7} at 95% confidence level from 1987GeZU) and 2.54 {I6} (1973Pl08), based on measured source activity and I|g). Ice{-LMN}=11.5% {I6} (1990Ke01). See comment on mult(84|g) for summary of ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0029 (1972Ca21); |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I2} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)) 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.91 {I10} for 985|g-84|g(|q) (1969PaZR). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0065 {I18} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)) implies mult=E2+M1: M1 component inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/ce=0.87. 
RI observation limit resulting from proximity of strong 1226|g. 
I(ce(K))/I(1145|g)=0.00269 from |a(K)exp and I|g limits (1972Ca21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0103 (1972Ca21); |a(K)exp=0.0094 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). 
CC estimated from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00087 (1972Ca21); |a(K)exp=0.00088 {I8} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). 
A{-2}=-0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} for 1280|g-84|g(|q) (1969PaZR). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0016 (1972Ca21) for doublet dominated by this |g. 
A{-2}=+0.22 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.92 {I19} for 1396|g-84|g(|q) (1969PaZR). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/ce=0.87 
|a(K)exp|>0.15 (1972Ca21). 
I(ce(K))/I(1482|g)=0.00111 from |a(K)exp>0.15 if I|g<10 (1972Ca21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/ce=0.87 
|a(K)exp|>0.14 (1972Ca21). 
I(ce(K))/I(1482|g)=0.00321 from |a(K)exp>0.14 if I|g<31 (1972Ca21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0021 {I5} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)) allows mult=E2,M1; M1 inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00062 (1972Ca21), mult=E1; however, 1988DzZW deduce |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3}, mult=M1(+E2). The evaluator favors the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0033 (1972Ca21); |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). K/L=2.25 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0076 {I12} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)); implies mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g, but alternative placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0076 {I12} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)); implies mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g, but this placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Other |a(K)exp: 0.00025 (1972Ca21) for doublet. 
M if this component were E2, |a(K)exp=0.00046 would be expected for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp|<0.0064 (1972Ca21); 0.0035 {I10} (1988DzZW). Mult=E2 from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00043 {I4} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)) for doublet. Other |a(K)exp: 0.00030 (1972Ca21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00036 {I4} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)) for doublet dominated by this component. Other |a(K)exp: 0.00025 (1972Ca21) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0077 {I23} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)), mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g; however, this placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp from 1972Ca21 is low for E1 but similar to |a(K)exp for 2364 and 2412 E1 transitions in 1972Ca21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0047 {I9} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp; |DJ=2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0042 (1972Ca21) for 916.65|g+916.90|g doublet; mult(916.65|g)=E1 is required by level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0040 (1972Ca21); |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I3} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)) 
M |a(K)exp is for doublet dominated by 1133.6|g. 1132.86|g (mult)=[M1,E2] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00057 {I17} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E2,M1 from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00060 {I14} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). Other |a(K)exp: 0.00037 (1972Ca21). 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp; E2 inconsistent with log| {Ift} from 0+ in |e decay to 2661 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00021 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E1 from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00060 (1972Ca21), mult=M1, but |a(K)exp<0.00028 adopted in 1988DzZW implying mult=E1. Level scheme implies M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$placed by evaluator, based on E|g, and multipolarity; 1990Gr19 placed |g from 1985 level, but E|g is too low for that placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp for doublet: 0.0012 (1972Ca21), 0.00140 {I10} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)); consistent with E1-M1 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0043 {I14} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)) indicates mult=M1; however, placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.09 (I(ce), 1960Ha18; I|g, 1972Ca21) suggests mult=M1; K/L implies E1 or M1(+E2). Uncertainties may, however, be large. M1 inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0145 (1972Ca21); |a(K)exp=0.012 {I3} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). 
M$E2 favored by |a(K)exp but inconsistent with level scheme; E1+M2 would imply |d=0.28 {I+6-7}. However, mixed multipolarity inconsistent with level scheme if J(2820)=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp|<0.023 (1972Ca21); 0.0297 {I23} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). K/L=5.0 (1960Ha18). 
M E2 component inconsistent with decay scheme if J(2820)=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M M1+E2 from |a(K)exp but mixed multipolarity inconsistent with level scheme if J(2820)=0. 
Other |a(K)exp: |<0.0022 for doublet dominated by 1307.55|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M E2 from ce data of 1990AbZT and |a(K)exp=0.038 {I5} (1988DzZW), not consistent with either placement of |g-ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp favors mult=M1, but large uncertainty may render result unreliable. Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.018 {I4} (1988DzZW) exceeds M1(theory) for doubly-placed |g 
E$placement is tentative in 1990Gr19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0075 (1972Ca21) and |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I24} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)) imply mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E1, E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0042 (1972Ca21) for 916.65|g+916.90|g doublet implies mult(916.9|g)=M1 if mult(916.65|g)=E1 as required by level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0009 {I5} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00031 {I9} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00038 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). 
M E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g is inconsistent with this 1- to 0+ placement and also with alternative placement from 3092 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I11} (1988DzZW) for doubly-placed |g. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0037 {I19} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)); however, 1970Dz11 do not report the 1648.8|g, so their 1646.2|g may be a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00038 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)) for doubly-placed |g; however, E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with this placement and also with alternative placement from 3008 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0017 {I8} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)) gives mult=M1,E2; 1988DzZW deduce |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}, too low for pure M1. adopted level scheme requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other |a(K)exp: 0.0023 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)); |a(K)exp|<0.0042 (1972Ca21). 
M (M1) from |a(K)exp; however, level scheme requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00069 {I11}, mult=E1,E2 (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)). 1988DzZW adopt |a(K)exp=0.00058 {I9}, favoring E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00127 {I19} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)) for 2029.4 {I4} transition; that line may possibly be contaminated or misassigned to {+170}Lu in ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0041 {I12} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M M1+E0+E2 from |a(K)exp, but level scheme requires |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0022 {I13} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)). 
M M1(+E2+E0) from |a(K)exp; |DJ=1 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2+E0)
decay_comment:
1990Gr19 estimate |a(K)exp>0.012 assuming I|g does not exceed I|g for weak lines in same region of |g spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0010 {I3} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E1,E2 from |a(K)exp; not E2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other |a(K)exp: 0.00087 (1972Ca21). Datum may be low; |a(K)exp=0.0011 if intensities renormalized so |a(K)exp(1972Ca21)=|a(K)(E1) for 1860|g. However, mult=E1 required by decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00104 {I21} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)) for 2019.0 {I8} transition; significantly different from that adopted here from 1988DzZW. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0129 {I16} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). 
M M1 from |a(K)exp; inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M note that |a(K)exp exceeds |a(K)(M1) suggesting presence of E0 component, inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I5} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)). 
M E2,M1 from |a(K)exp; inconsistent with adopted level scheme. 
M E2,M1 from |a(K)exp; E2 inconsistent with log| {Ift} from 0+ in |e decay to 3196 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Other |a(K)exp: 0.00027 {I6} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)); value is midway between those expected for E1 and E2, suggesting that line might be complex. Adopted |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0155 {I16} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M M1 from |a(K)exp; E1 required by placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$placed from 3146 level also in 1990Gr19 but E|g does not fit that placement. 
1990Gr19 estimate |a(K)exp>0.008 assuming I|g does not exceed I|g for weak lines in same region of |g spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00089 {I25} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1973TeZT, I(ce)). 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp; pure |DJ=1 required by level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00035 {I12} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1970Dz11, I(ce)). 
M E2,M1 from |a(K)exp; |DJ<2 from log| {Ift}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00043 {I11} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)). 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp; |DJ<2 from log| {Ift}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0011 {I4} (1972Ca21, I|g; 1968Ba54, I(ce)), mult=M1+E2+E0 or M2; |e feeding of parent level favors the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |d(D,Q)=-0.42 {I7} or -1.65 {I20} from |g(|q); not E1+M2 from RUL. 
A{-2}=-0.69 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
KC=0.00109. 
M |a(K)exp and |g(|q) consistent with E1+E2 for doublet. 
|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I4} (1981Wa14) for doublet. 
A{-2}=0.00 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.16 {I8} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.22 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I9} implies |DJ=1 (1981Wa14). 
M |a(K)exp implies mult=M1+E2; however, |D|p=yes from placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC=0.049 10,LC=0.0081 9,MC=0.00183 18,NC+=0.00054 6, CC=0.060 12. 
A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}; A{-4}=+0.09 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC=0.025 5,LC=0.0041 6,CC=0.030 6. 
A{-2}=-0.183 {I18}; A{-4}=-0.021 {I23}. J to J-1 transition (1981Wa14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
KC(M1)=0.01513,LC=0.00221. 
|a(K)exp corrected for assumed E1 multipolarity of relatively weak 698.1-keV component of doublet (1981Wa14). 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I5}; A{-4}=+0.12 {I7} for 698.0|g+698.1|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
KC=0.02203. 
|a(K)exp is for doublet dominated by this transition. 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
KC=0.00262. 
M |a(K)exp and |g(|q) consistent with E1+E2 doublet. 
|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I4} (1981Wa14) for doublet. 
A{-2}=0.00 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.16 {I8} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
KC(E2)=0.02196. 
|a(K)exp=0.026 {I5} (1981Wa14) for doublet in which this transition is a minor component. 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$magnitude from subshell ratios in |e decay, sign from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. Nuclear orientation in |e decay favors negative sign, but adopted sign supported by |d for three other |DJ=1 transitions in g.s. band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$other: 41 {I5} in (|a,3n|g) E=35, 40 MeV, 37.9 {I6} in Coulomb excitation. 
MR$other: 0.71 {I21} from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,3n|g) E=35, 40 MeV. Other E|g: 163.847 {I5} for doublet in |e I|g; other: 94 {I10} in (|a,3n|g) E=35, 40 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(Yb K| x ray)/I|g(66.7|g)=6.98 {I34} (1970Mo07) and 6.5 {I9} (1966Di02), |a(K)exp=7.3 4 and 6.8 {I9}, respectively, assuming K-fluorescence yield=0.951. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.46 {i10}, a{-4}=-0.27 {i13} (1972Li25); not analyzed in 1976Kr21 and not consistent with Adopted multipolarity, |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(163.8|g) and relative photon branchings from 230.6 level in {+171}Lu |e decay (8.24 d). I|g=113 for doublet. 
A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1972Li25) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g=194 {I19} for both placements of 163.8|g and I|g=91 {I14} for 259.1 level placement. 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1972Li25) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1972Li25) for doublet. 
RI$deduced from I|g(91.4|g) and adopted relative photon branchings from 259.1 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.58 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1972Li25) for doublet. 
M inferred from coefficients for 109.3|g and 109.8|g combined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.66 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I59} (1972Li25) for doublet. 
RI$deduced from I|g(241.6|g) and adopted relative photon branchings from 449.6 level. I|g=300 {I30} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas. 
RI deduced from I|g=300 {I30} for both placements of 132.2|g and I|g=105 for 449.6 level placement. 
A{-2}=-0.66 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1972Li25) for 132.2|g+132.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1972Li25) for 241.6|g+242.1|g. 
M inferred from coefficients for 241.6|g and 242.1|g combined; this transition dominates doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g=113 {I11} for both placements of 154.7|g and I|g=55 {I14} for 230.6 level placement. 
A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1972Li25) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1972Li25) for doublet. 
M uncertain due to interference from 6+ to 4+ transition in {+172}Yb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.34 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I9} (1972Li25) for 329.9|g+331.1|g. 
M$inferred from coefficients for 329.9|g and 331.1|g combined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.16 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I10} (1972Li25). 
RI,M$uncertain due to interference from 8+ to 6+ transition in {+172}Yb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.57 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1972Li25). 
M$A{-2}=-0.57 suggests dipole; E1 required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.66 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1972Li25) for 132.2|g+132.9|g. 
M$inferred from coefficients for 132.2 and 132.9|g combined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI reported precision is higher than for much stronger lines; evaluator suspects typographical error (possibly, I|g=84 {I7} instead). 
DCO=0.32 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 1041.13 {I14} (0.68 {I8}) (2007ChZX). 
RI includes component from {+172}Yb (1972Wa10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$doublet (broader than normal peak); includes component from {+13}C. 
Other E|g (I|g): 1265.10 {I22} (0.27 {I4}) (2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Doublet (peak broader than normal). 
RI includes component from {+174}Yb. 
Other E|g (I|g): 5284.9 {I5} (4.9 {I5}) (2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=6.3 {I7}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=242 {I6}:486 {I11}:489 {I11}:56.4 {I11}:104.0 12:122.0 {I16}:62 {I3} (1966Ka11); K/L=1.4 {I1} (1975Ar15). 
MR$from subshell ratios and BrIccMixing; sign is from Adopted Gammas. A{-2}=+0.9 {I5} (implying |d=-0.6 {I+6-12}) (1985Kr07) is inconsistent with adopted |d=+0.693; |d=+2.0 {I+50-12} (1976Kr04) may not be reliable due to limited resolution and source impurities (see discussion in 1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1981Ba52. Other E|g: 9.150 {I8} (1974Bo55). 
RI$deduced from intensity balance at 66.7 level (|e+|b{++} feeding of 76 level not expected (first-forbidden and |DK=3)); value compares with I|g(exp)=0.303 {I24}, as deduced from Ice(N)(9.2|g) and intensity data for 66.7|g (1975Ar15). 
$M1:M2:M3:N=15.5 {I10}:2.2 {I4}:2.1 {I5}:3.7 {I5} (1975Ar15). 
$Ice(N)(9.2|g)|?one third Ice(L1)(19.4|g) (1969Ba38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.59 {I13}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5)=940 {I66}:111 {I2}:1776 {I37}:1784 37:23.3 {I7}:441 {I13}:510 {I15}: 11.9 {I4} (1966Ka11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1989GoZU (precision measurement of 8 ce lines). Other E|g: 19.384 {I8} (1974Bo55), 19.388 {I1} (1981Ba52), 19.402 {I10} (1984Ad02). 
RI$I|g(calc) deduced from intensity balance at 75.9 level (|e+|b{++} feeding of g.s. band not expected (|DJ=0, but |DK=3)); value compares with I|g(exp)=31.7 {I9}. The discrepancy between I|g(calc) and I|g(exp) could be explained by anomalous conversion of the 19.4|g (1975Ar26 suggest the latter explanation on the basis of L- and M-subshell ratios). 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M4:M5:N:O=10.1 {I15}:13.8 {I10}:22.1 {I17}:3.04 {I35}:1.12 {I8}:1.34 9:3.17 {I18}:0.36 {I2} (1966Ka11); L1:L2:L3=0.76 {I4}:0.69 {I4}:1.00 (1975Ar26); M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5)=0.64 {I3}:0.72 {I3}:1.00:0.42 {I3} (1975Ar26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$L1:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:N:O=396 {I59}:433 {I36}:51 {I8}:46 {I7}:49 {I7}:15 {I2}:22 {I3}:15 {I2} (1966Ka11); L1:L2:L3=0.6 {I1}:|?0.6:0.6 {I1} (1975Ar15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1981Ba52. 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=1290 {I70}:283 {I27}:222 {I26}:225 {I28}:65 {I12}:56 {I12} (1966Ka11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M:N=2840 {I70}:299 {I14}:99 {I12}:734 {I22}:170 {I12} (1966Ka11); L1:L2:L3=9.6 {I4}:3.1 {I2}:1.00 (1975Ar26); A{-2}=+0.47 {I26}, |d=-0.05 {I15} (1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=6.1 {I4}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(N1+N2):O=1170 {I81}:192 {I3}:68.6 {I29}:56.4 28:50.4 {I15}:19.5 {I6}:16.1 {I5}:16.2 {I6}:1.6 {I6} (1966Ka11); A{-2}=+0.80 {I18}, |d=-0.31 {I+13-18} (1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=4.29 {I30}; K:L1:M1:M2:M3=4530 {I290}:649 {I40}:144 {I8}:41 {I4}:21 {I2} (1966Ka11); A{-2}=+0.81 {I8}, |d=-0.30 {I+6-7} (1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.23 {I3}; K:L1:L2:L3=55 {I9}:11 {I2}:28 {I2}:25 {I2} (1959Ha09,1966Ka11). 
RI$deduced from intensity balance at 230.6 level (|e+|b{++} feeding of g.s. band not expected (first forbidden, |DK=3)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=3.66 {I23}; K:L1:L2:L3=1600 {I80}:211 {I12}:54 {I5}:46 {I5} (1966Ka11); A{-2}=+0.71 {I14}, |d=-0.25 {I+9-11} (1985Kr07). A{-2}=+0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I9} for 689|g-91|g(|q) (1977Se05) implies |d=-0.22 {I+11-13} if |d(689|g)=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from I|g=0.54 {I3} for both placements of 163.8|g and I|g=0.186 15 for 230.6 level placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.92 {I9}; K:L1:L2:L3:M=1140 {I30}:201 {I24}:39 {I4}:15 {I4}:32 {I5} (1966Ka11); A{-2}=+0.59 {I7}, |d=-0.16 {I4} (1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.141 {I18}; L1:L2:L3:(M1+M2+M3):(M4+M5):N1:O1=4.8 {I9}:11.2 {I18}:7.1 11:5.6 {I10}:0.10:1.4 {I3}:0.41 {I22} (1980EgZX); K:L1:L2=29 {I2}:4.0 {I8}:10 {I2} (1966Ka11); A{-2}=-0.45 {I14}, |d=+0.01 {I13} (1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1980EgZX. E|g=241.40 {I3} (1981Ba52) and 241.41 {I4} (1984Ad02) are presumably for 241.7|g+240.6|g doublet. 
RI$see comment with 240.6|g. 
$|a(K)exp=0.16 {I3} (ce data from 1980EgZX); K:L1:L2:L3=3.8 {I6}:0.30 {I9}:0.42 9:0.30 {I7} (1980EgZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(exp)=0.062 {I3} for 241.4|g; I|g apportioned to give I|g(240.6|g)=0.0074 {I5} and I|g(241.4|g)=0.055 {I3} on basis of I|g(240.6|g)/I|g(256.6|g)=0.158 {I5} in Coulomb excitation. 
$K:L1:L2:L3=2.0 {I4}:0.11 {I6}:0.19 {I8}:0.16 {I9} (1980EgZX). 
M,MR$from Adopted Gammas. 
$Placement from Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from Adopted Gammas. 
$|a(K)exp=0.112 {I14}; K:L1:L2:L3=3.0 {I5}:0.33 {I6}:0.45 {I8}:0.30 {I8} (1980EgZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0132 {I3}; A{-2}=-0.55 {I4}, |d=+0.76 {I+14-19} (1985Kr07). A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I10} for 627|g-86|g(|q) (1977Se05), implying |d=+1.4 {I+149-3} if |d(86|g)=-0.222 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0085 {I2}; K/L=8.8 {I19} (1966Ka11); L1:L2:M=1.28 {I6}:0.15 {I5}:0.30 {I5} (1980EgZX); A{-2}=+0.91 {I5}, |d=-1.52 {I16} (1985Kr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$1981Ba52 report E|g=689.373 {I13} in table 1, but 689.324 in table 3. 
$|a(K)exp=0.00261 {I9}; M1/N1=4.5 {I13} (1980EgZX); A{-2}=+0.210 {I14}, |d=+0.029 {I9} (1985Kr07). A{-2}=-0.007 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} for 689|g-164|g(|q) (1977Se05) not consistent with conclusions of 1985Kr07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=-0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I8} (1977Se05) for 794|g-155|g(|q) if |d(155|g)=+0.521 {I16}. Other |d: 0.5 {I+3-4} from |a(K)exp=0.0099 {I10}; |d=+1.1 {I4} or 0.0 {I2} from A{-2}=-0.44 {I13} (1985Kr07, nuclear orientation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$see Table I of 2018Ka48 for a complete breakdown of uncertainty contributions in terms of sensitivity coefficients. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
ce(K)(1076|g)/ce(K)(1094)|<7 (1968Wi22) 
M$(1076|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I12} (1972WuZZ,1973HoYJ) give |d(Q/D)=-0.02 {I6}. Mult=E1 from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
ce(K)(912|g)/ce(K)(1094)=34 {I9} (1968Wi22) 
MR$from (912|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1972WuZZ,1973HoYJ). |d=-0.60 {I+9-15} is also possible from |g|g(|q). |d=-2.36 {I15} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from (1094|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.44 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.022 {I23} (1972WuZZ, 1973HoYJ). |d=-0.58 {I+7-12} is also possible from |g|g(|q). A{-2}=-0.28 (1970He17). Mult=M1+E2, |d=-4.0 {I3} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$(1387|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.076 {I14}, A{-4}=0.36 {I10} (1972WuZZ). |d=-5.1 {I+11-16} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.69 {I+15-11} or +5 {I+4-2} from (1398|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=0.20 {I9} (1972WuZZ). Mult=M1+E2(+E0), |d(E2/M1)=0.8 {I5} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,Q
decay_comment:
MR$-0.40 {I+18-28} or -5 {I+3-34} from (1289|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.17 {I13}, A{-4}=0.01 {I18} (1972WuZZ). Mult=M1+E2, |d=2.8 {I+7-10} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-7.2 {I+17-28} or -0.32 {I4} from (1470|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1972WuZZ). Mult=M1+E2, |d=-7.6 {I+19-36} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+D
decay_comment:
MR$(1530|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.146 {I14}, A{-4}=0.36 {I3} (1972WuZZ). Mult=E2+M1(+E0) from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,Q
decay_comment:
MR$>10 or -0.20 {I6} from (1584|g)(79|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I7} (1972WuZZ). Mult=E2(+M1), |d=+55 {I+94-22} from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1993He18 
RI$from I(|g+ce)(79|g)(per 100 decays)=99.2 {I2}. Weighted average of 1978Bo18, 1978Hn01 and 1970Se05 gives 15.8 {I7}. I|g=16.8 {I13} (1978Hn01) 
CEK GT 2600, CEL1=1140 19, CEL2=16605 40, CEL3=16898 40, CEM1=267 6, CEM2=4643 50, CEM3=4783 50, CE(M4+M5)=96 6, CEN=2006 25, CEO=490 13 ( 1968Ka01). OTHER CE DATA: 1961Ha23, 1962Br40, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1960Io01, 1957Bo61 
MR(E2/M1)=4.9 4 FROM L- AND M-SUBSHELL RATIOS BUT DJPI REQUIRES E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 181.530 {I4} (1978Bo18) and 181.519 {I6} (1965Ka17,from ce(L3) line) 
M$from L1/L2=0.43 {I2}, L1/L3=0.57 {I2} (1968Ka01) and |a(K)exp=0.210 {I8} 
|d(M3/E2)=-0.002 {I35} (1984Kr14), <0.05 from L-subshell ratios 
CEK=2630 70 (1978Bo18), CEL1=296 4, CEL2=694 6, CEL3=518 5 CEM=331 19, CEN=89 6 (1968Ka01). OTHER CE DATA: 1961Ha23, 1963Tu01, 1965Ka17, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1960Io01, 1957Bo61 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=0.00 {I10} (1984Kr14), -0.030 {I7} (1983No10), <0.07 from ce data 
M$from L1/L3=3.0 (1961Ha23) and |a(K)exp=0.072 {I5} 
CEK=52.2 13 (1978Bo18), CEL1=16, CEL3=5.3, CEM=4.3 (1961Ha23) MR(E2/M1)=3.1 +8-5 FROM CE DATA. OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-2.47 {I8} (1983No10), -1.9 {I1} (1976Kr04), -1.88 {I+9-14} (1982BuZH), -1.7 {I2} (1969Vu01), 2.7 {I+12-6} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0047 {I3} 
CEK=43.7 14 (1978Bo18), CEL=7.3 3, CEM=1.9 2 (1968Ka01) OTHER 1972Ba50, 1969Vu01, 1968Ka01, 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-4.05 {I3} (1983No10), -3.2 {I2} (1976Kr04), -3.75 {I11} (1982BuZH), -3.3 {I4} (1969Vu01), -3.5 {I2} (1967Bl01,1971Wa03), >4 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.00262 {I17}, |a(L)exp=0.00045 {I2} 
CEK=100 (USED FOR NORMALIZATION OF OTHER CE INTENSITIES), CEL=15.8, CE M=4.7 5 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1968Ka01, 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1970Se05 report E|g=960.4 {I3}, I|g=0.18 {I6}. |g not reported by 1978Bo18. |a(K)exp<0.10 
CEK LE 2 (1972Ba50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1993He18 
MR$from L1/L2=0.230 {I12}, L2/L3=1.045 {I21}, M1/M2=0.261 {I10}, M2/M3=0.935 {I28} (1968Ka01) and |a(K)exp=1.62 {I6}. Sign(|d) from -2.4 {I2} (1976Kr04) and -2.33 {I15} (1982BuZH) 
CEK=4834 127, CEL1=707 6, CEL2=3064 19, CEL3=2930 19, CEM1=191 6, CEM2=732 13, CEM3=783 13, CEN=484 13, CEO=63 6 (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1962Br40, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1957Bo61 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=-0.05 {I+8-10} (1984Kr14), <0.09 from |a(K)exp 
|a(K)exp=0.0062 {I6} 
CEK=1.75 8 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=8.81 {I12}. Intensity divided based on adopted gammas 
MR$>2.5 (from |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00062 {I10}), +41 {I+50-15} (1982BuZH), >+21 (1976Kr04), -23 {I3} (1983No10), >13 (1969Vu01) 
MR=-0.90 12 (1984Kr14) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
CEK=12.2 4, CEL=1.6 2 (1968Ka01), CEM=0.6 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$0.80 {I6} (1970Se05) 
|d(M3/E2)=+0.04 {I7} (1984Kr14), <0.06 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.00228 {I24} 
CEK=0.47 4 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.10 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1993He18 
M,MR$from L1/L2=0.43 {I4}, L2/L3=1.17 {I8}, M1/M2=0.31 {I10}, M2/M3=1.00 {I14} (1968Ka01). 
|a(K)exp=1.06 {I21}, |a(L2)exp=0.40 {I1} 
CEK=930 13, CEL1=123 5, CEL2=281 6, CEL3=247 6, CEM1=19 6 CEM2=62 6, CEM3=62 6, CEN=32 6 (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1962Br40, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=+0.01 {I5} (1984Kr14), 0.000 {I14} (1983No10), <0.05 (from L1/L2=0.56 {I3}, L2/L3=1.37 {I7} (1968Ka01)) 
|a(K)exp=0.150 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.032 {I1} 
CEK=471 6, CEL1=51 2, CEL2=91 2, CEL3=67 2, CEM=51 6 (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW, 1963Tu01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0023 {I4} gives E2 
|d(E2/M1)>3.3 (1969Vu01) 
CEK=0.54 9 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$a small part of the intensity may belong with 1927 level 
MR$-2.4 {I+15-8} (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.00183 {I20} gives |d>2.5 
CEK=0.98 5 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.14 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00138 {I22} gives E2 
M$|g(|q,t) (1984Kr14,1976Kr04) consistent with E2 
CEK=0.56 7 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.10 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$0.056 {I7} (1970Se05) 
M,MR$from L1/L2=0.62 {I19}, L2/L3=1.3 {I3} (1968Ka01) and |a(K)exp=0.63 {I16} 
CEK=19 3, CEL1=3.8 13, CEL2=5.7 13, CEL3=4.4 13 (1968Ka01). CEM=3.9 (1961Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q,t) (1984Kr14) consistent with E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0097 {I15} gives |d(M3/E2)<0.06 
M$from L1/L2=0.79 {I14}, L2/L3=1.52 {I25}, L1/L3=1.20 {I26} (1968Ka01) and |a(K)exp=0.0097 {I15} 
CEK=28 6, CEL1=3.6 5, CEL2=4.5 5, CEL3=3.0 5, CEM=0.13 3 (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0022 {I3} gives |d>1.8 
CEK=0.26 3 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.06 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-7.6 {I+10-14} (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.00128 {I22} gives E2 
CEK=0.57 8 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.03 {I4} (1976Kr04), 0.0 (from |a(K)exp). |d=-0.207 {I6} (1983No10) is discrepant and gives B(M2)(W.u.)>>1 (RUL(M2)=1) 
|a(K)exp=0.0187 {I17} 
CEK=8.6 5 (1978Bo18), 20 (1961Ha23). CEL1=3.3 (1961Ha23). OTHER: 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.15 {I3} (1983No10), 0.0 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0101 {I7} 
CEK=21.2 13 (1978Bo18). CEL=3.3 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1960Tu01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$<-6 (1984Kr14) 
|a(K)exp=0.0023 {I3} for possible doublet gives |d=1.4 {I+11-5} 
CEK=0.38 4 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$0.33 {I3} (1970Se05) 
|d(M3/E2)=+0.04 {I20} (1984Kr14) 
|a(K)exp=0.0010 {I3} gives E2 
CEK=0.061 22 (1972Ba50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$0.00 {I4} (1976Kr04) 
MR=-9 +6-2 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.050 {I5} (1978Bo18) gives |d=1.0 {I2}. But |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3} (1972Ba50) is consistent with |d=0 
CEK=17.5 12 (1978Bo18), 37 7 (1972Ba50), 25 (1961Ha23). CEL=3.0 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.13 {I+6-5} (1976Kr04), -0.03 {I3} (1983No10) 
|a(K)exp=0.035 {I3} gives |d=0.7 {I2} 
CEK=40.9 11 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1964Ka07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$+3.2 {I2} (1982BuZH), >+20 (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.00135 {I19} consistent with E2 
CEK=0.60 6 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00156 {I20} gives |d>1.5 
CEK=2.50 10 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.26 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01 
MR$+18 {I3} (1976Kr04). |d=+0.267 {I12} (1984Kr14), +0.31 {I1} (1976Kr04) are inconsistent with |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0476 {I12} gives |d<1.2 
CEK=6.8 16 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Ka07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.03 {I2} (1983No10), +0.05 {I4} (1976Kr04), +0.08 {I+7-5} (1982BuZH) 
|a(K)exp=0.032 {I3} gives |d<0.7 
CEK=78.2 25 (1978Bo18). CEL=11 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+10 {I+4-3} (1976Kr04), +5.5 {I+7-6} (1982BuZH) 
|a(K)exp=0.00164 {I23} gives |d>2.5 
CEK=0.58 7 (1972Ba50). CEL AP 0.14, CEM=0.05 2 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+18 {I+5-3} (1976Kr04) 
MR=+0.31 1 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.00134 {I17} gives |d>2.5 
CEK=1.75 13 (1972Ba50). CEL AP 0.23, CEM AP 0.08 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.27 gives E1, E2 
CEK LT 16 (1961Ha23). 1970Se05 QUOTE EKC=0.191 16 FROM CE DATA OF 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp. 1976Kr04 give |d=+0.36 {I28} 
|a(K)exp|<0.021 gives |d<0.13 
CEK LE 7 (1978Bo18). CEL=1.4 (1961Ha23). 1970Se05 QUOTE EKC=0.048 30 FROM CE DATA OF 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d(M2/E1)=-0.13 {I18} (1980DaZI) 
|a(K)exp=0.0099 {I12} gives |d<0.15 
CEK=0.83 6 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.40 {I+36-22} (1976Kr04), -0.04 {I4} (1983No10) 
|a(K)exp=0.036 {I3} gives |d=0.7 {I2} 
CEK=15.6 7 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.10 {I8} (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.026 {I5} gives |d<0.8 
CEK=4.6 9 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$<-11 (1976Kr04) 
MR=-1.15 10 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.00131 {I19} gives E2 
CEK=0.92 9 (1978Bo18). CEL=0.10 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=+0.01 {I5} (1984Kr14), <0.4 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0017 {I6} 
CEK=0.53 18 (1972Ba50). CEL AP 0.10 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1978Bo18. Line unresolved in 1978Hn01 and 1970Se05 
|a(K)exp=0.68 for 145.21|g+146.03|g (1978Bo18) gives |d(E2/M1)=1.4 {I1} 
CEK(145G+146G)=44 (1961Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit in level scheme. Level energy difference gives 337.18 
|a(K)exp=0.08 {I4} gives M1,E2 
CEK AP 2 (1978Bo18), 2.6 (1961Ha23) 
Placement by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.034 {I5} 
CEK=2.4 2 (1978Bo18), 10 4 (1972Ba50), 3.9 (1961Ha23). OTHERS 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$level energy difference is 540.084 
RI$main intensity belongs with 1803 level 
MR$-0.18 {I3} (1983No10), -0.04 {I7} or +1.0 {I+2-1} (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} gives |d=0.6 {I3} 
CEK=25 2 (1978Bo18). CEL=3.3 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.05 {I4} (1976Kr04) 
MR=-7.0 +15-26 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.0217 {I17} gives |d<0.5 
CEK=5.87 23 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$or -0.84 {I+9-11} (1984Kr14). Others: <-9 or -1.2 {I2} (1976Kr04), >2.5 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.00145 {I21} 
CEK=0.90 9 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.12 4 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=+0.03 {I6} (1984Kr14), <0.3 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0015 {I3} 
CEK=0.40 8 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.06 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp. 1980DaZI give |d=-0.13 {I22} 
|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I5} 
CEK=0.115 22 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.04 2 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZw, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$or +0.21 {I4} (1984Kr14). Others: +12 {I+8-3} or +0.24 {I4} (1976Kr04), >0.7 (from |a(K)exp). Lower |d is not supported by |a(K)exp 
|a(K)exp=0.0016 {I4} 
CEK=0.28 7 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.10 4 (1964Dz01). OTHER: 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I17} gives M1,E2 but |DJ|p requires E1 
CEK=0.07 3 (1978Bo18) 
Placement by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+1.1 {I3} (1976Kr04), 1.6 {I+9-4} (from |a(K)exp) 
MR=-0.18 15 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.018 {I3} 
CEK=4.7 5 (1978Bo18), 2.3 9 (1972Ba50), 6.6 (1961Ha23). OTHER 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit in level scheme. Level energy difference is 1666.68 
MR$-6.1 {I+9-12} (1976Kr04) 
MR=+0.33 3 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp|<0.0011 gives E2 or E1 
CEK LE 0.18 (1972Ba50). OTHER: 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E,RI$ FROM 1978Bo18. LINE NOT RESOLVED IN 1978Hn01 AND 1970Se05 
|a(K)exp=0.68 for 145.21|g+146.03|g (1978Bo18) gives |d(E2/M1)=1.4 {I1} 
CEK(145G+146G)=44 (1961Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$or +0.09 {I+23-12} (1984Kr14). Others: +0.40 {I13} (1976Kr04), <+0.61 (1983No10), 0.6 {I2} (from |a(K)exp) 
L1/L2=0.87 (1963Tu01). |a(K)exp=0.173 {I12} 
CEK=202 4 (1978Bo18). ELC=38 (1961Ha23), EL1C=29 6 (1978Me13) OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07, 1963Tu01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1957Bo61 
K/L=7.4, L/M=2 (1960Pl03). K/L=5.8 (1960Tu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.40 {I14} (1976Kr04), +0.40 {I10} (1983No10), 0.68 {I13} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.104 {I7} 
CEK=96 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=17 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1978Me13, 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d(M2/E1)=+0.02 {I12} (1983No10), +0.04 {I7} (1976Kr04), <0.05 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0102 {I19} 
CEK=1.8 4 (1978Bo18). OTHER: 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.65 {I2} (1983No10), +1.2 {I+5-3} (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.060 {I4} gives |d=1.0 {I2} 
CEK=98 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=14 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 
K/L=4.3, L/M=1.9 (1960Pl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.94 {I+26-10} or +1.6 {I+2-4} (1976Kr04), +0.98 {I5} (1983No10), 1.2 {I2} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.043 {I3} 
CEK=52 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=10 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03. K/L=4.6, L/M=4.5 (1960Pl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
|g reported by 1978Bo18 only 
|a(K)exp|<0.085 gives D, E2, E3 
$CEK LE 1.3 (ASSUMED BY 1978Bo18 FROM 1961Ha23, BUT 1961Ha23 Q WEAK CEK LINE) KC= 0.0569 $LC= 0.00846 $MC=0.00188 $NC+=0.00056 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.08 {I2} (1983No10), +0.18 {I+9-7} (1976Kr04), <0.01 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0063 {I15} 
CEK=6.5 15 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$main intensity belongs with decay of 2073 level 
|a(K)exp=0.018 {I5} gives |d>1.3 
CEK=2.4 6 (1972Ba50). OTHER: 1968PrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=-0.06 {I14} (1984Kr14) 
|a(K)exp=0.0072 {I19} gives E2 
CEK=2.06 8 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, K/L=4.0 (1960Tu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.012 {I7} (1976Kr04), -0.025 {I2} (1983No10), -0.05 {I3} (1982BuZH) 
|a(K)exp=0.0145 {I16} gives |d=0.7 {I2} 
CEK=54.7 17 (1978Bo18). CEL=7.1 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 
K/L=4.5 7, L/M=2.1 (1960Tu01). K/L=8.1 (1960Pl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.026 {I24} (1976Kr04), -0.03 {I+9-7} (1982BuZH) 
|a(K)exp=0.0103 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00190 {I4} give |d=0.46 {I4} 
CEK=101 1, CEL=18.6 3 (1968Ka01). CEM=4.4 17 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.066 {I5} (1976Kr04), +0.06 {I2} (1982BuZH) 
|a(K)exp=0.0083 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00123 {I3}, |a(M)exp=0.00026 {I1} give |d=0.58 {I4} 
CEK=146 1, CEL=21.7 3, CEM=4.5 2 (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$or -0.75 {I12} (1984Kr14). Others: <-18, >+13, -1.0 {I2} (1976Kr04). |a(K)exp agrees better with larger |d 
|a(K)exp=0.0010 {I3} gives |d>1.5 
CEK=0.12 3 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|d(M3/E2)=-0.27 {I15} (1980DaZI), <0.35 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0009 {I5} 
CEK=0.08 4 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+16 {I+13-5} (1976Kr04), >6 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0064 {I7} 
CEK=3.22 12 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.34 {I3} (1976Kr04), <0.6 (from |a(K)exp) 
MR=-2.2 2 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.00162 {I22} 
CEK=0.58 5, CEL=0.11 4, CEM=0.04 2 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$or +2.7 {I+8-7} (1984Kr14), <2.6 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3} 
CEK=0.050 14 (1972Ba50). OTHER: 1964Dz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit in level scheme. Level energy difference gives 389.04 
|a(K)exp=0.015 {I5} gives |d(M2/E1)<0.2 but |DJ|p requires M1,E2. |a(K)exp excludes M1,E2 
CEK=0.7 2 (1978Bo18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI=1.193 (1978Bo18) IS A MISPRINT. IT SHOULD READ 0.193 (SEE 1980VyZZ) 
|a(K)exp=0.027 {I10} 
CEK=2.0 7 (1972Ba50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.09 {I5} (1976Kr04) 
MR GT +13 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.0145 {I15} gives |d=0.8 {I2} 
CEK=6.2 5 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Ka07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.35 {I25} (1976Kr04), -0.11 {I4} (1983No10), 0.6 {I3} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0102 {I12} 
CEK=7.2 7 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.070 {I9} (1976Kr04), -0.06 {I2} (1983No10), 0.66 {I7} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0073 {I2} 
CEK=13.4 3, CEL=1.2 2 (1968Ka01). CEM=0.4 2 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp. Others: +0.11 {I+12-9} or +1.0 {I+3-2} for J=3 and +0.51 {I7} for J=4 (1976Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.0059 {I8} 
CEK=1.22 14 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
PLACEMENT WITH THE 1476 LEVEL IS UNLIKELY 
|a(K)exp=0.058 {I4} 
CEK=4.41 16 (1978Bo18), 6.3 (1961Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.03 {I2} (1983No10), +0.08 {I+18-11} or +0.82 {I+20-26} (1976Kr04), 0.5 {I2} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.040 {I4} 
CEK=14.1 7 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03. K/L=1.7 (1960Tu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.34 {I1} (1983No10), -0.02 {I9} (1976Kr04), <0.4 (from |a(K)exp) 
MR=+1.0 2 (1976Kr04) DISAGREES WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.035 {I3} 
CEK=13.6 9 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.04 {I6} (1976Kr04) 
MR=-4.3 +9-14 (1976Kr04) DISAGREES WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.0239 {I20} gives |d=0.5 {I2} 
CEK=4.90 21 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Ka07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.012 {I5} gives M1,E2 but |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I8} for ce(K)=0.17 {I5} gives E1 
CEK=0.8 3 (1972Ba50). BUT 1978Bo18 QUOTE CEK=0.17 5 FROM 1972Ba50 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from 1976Kr04. Others: +0.21 {I+20-14} (1984Kr14), +0.11 {I+13-9} (1976Kr04), +0.03 {I3} (1983No10), 0.75 {I25} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0056 {I5} 
CEK=4.7 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=1.0 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1964Dz01, 1964Ka07, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.26 {I5} (1976Kr04) 
MR=-2.1 +2-3 (1976Kr04) DISAGREES WITH EKC 
|a(K)exp=0.0046 {I4} gives |d=0.7 {I2} 
CEK=4.53 17 (1978Bo18). CEL=0.74 10, CEM=0.22 7 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1980DaZI. 
|a(K)exp=0.0019 {I5} gives M1 
CEK=0.065 14 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement by evaluator 
E,RI$from 1978Hn01. E|g=2205.1 {I4}, I|g=0.050 {I17} (1970Se05). E|g=2206.5 {I4} (1981MeZT). |g not reported by 1978Bo18 
|a(K)exp=0.0013 {I8} gives M1,E2 
CEK=0.0064 21 (1981MeZT). 1981MeZT QUOTE EKC=0.00018 11 WHICH SEEMS TO BE IN ERROR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$or +0.62 {I+53-19} (1984Kr14), +0.12 {I+28-16} or -0.8 {I+4-3}(1976Kr04), 0.7 {I3} (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.021 {I3} 
CEK=5.5 5 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0055 {I6} gives |d=1.1 {I4} 
CEK=0.64 6 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01, 1957Bo61 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E|g=1080.81 {I4}, I|g=1.89 {I5} (1970Se05) not used in averaging 
MR$-0.17 {I7} (1976Kr04), <0.46 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.0060 {I5} 
CEK=2.5 3 (1978Bo18), 3.2 2 (1968Ka01), 3.3 2 (1972Ba50). OTH 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01. K/L AP 3.7 (1960Pl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1978Hn01. I|g=0.40 {I8} for a 1172.3|g (1970Se05) is probably contributed by a sum line. |g not reported by 1978Bo18 
|a(K)exp|<0.003 gives E1, E2 
CEK LE 0.04 (1972Ba50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.40 {I24} (1976Kr04), <0.25 (from |a(K)exp) 
|a(K)exp=0.00145 {I22} 
CEK=0.19 2 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.03 (1964Dz01). OTHER: 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement by the evaluator 
E,RI$from 1978Hn01. E|g=2264.5 {I4} (1981MeZT). |g not reported by 1978Bo18 
|a(K)exp=0.00066 {I28} gives |d(E2/M1)>1 
CEK=0.0051 21 (1981MeZT). 1981MeZT QUOTE EKC=0.00009 4 WHICH SEEMS TO BE IN ERROR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=0.242 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.047 {I5} (1981Cr03) and adopted gammas 
A2=0.240 8, A4=-0.035 10 (1980Wa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from adopted gammas 
A{-2}=0.350 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.113 {I9} (1981Cr03) 
A2=0.341 8, A4=-0.084 10 (1980Wa15) 
CEK=100 4 (1981Cr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0059 {I9}. A{-2}=0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=0.04 {I3} (1981Cr03). |a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)=1.4 {I+9-4} 
CEK(858G)=7.2 11 (1981Cr03). CEK IS CONTRIBUTED BY BACKGROUND ALSO 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0044 {I9}. A{-2}=0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1981Cr03). |a(K)exp is also consistent with M1+E2, with |d=0.9 {I+9-5} 
CEK=6.2 12 (1981Cr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0009 {I5} (1981Cr03) gives E1 but |DJ|p requires E2 
CEK=2.7 13 (1981Cr03). CEK IS ALSO CONTRIBUTED BY CEK(1120G)+CEL(1070G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I5} (1981Cr03) 
CEK=3.7 10 (1981Cr03). CEK IS ALSO CONTRIBUTED BY CEL(1026G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
CEK=22.7 14 (1981Cr03). CEK IS ALSO CONTRIBUTED BY CEL(858G) 
MR$-0.18 {I4} allowed by |g(|q) is inconsistent with |a(K)exp 
|a(K)exp=0.0037 {I4}. A{-2}=0.057 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.016 {I13} (1981Cr03) 
A{-2}=0.044 {I14}, A{-4}=0.033 {I20} (1980Wa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
CEK=63.2 17 (1981Cr03). CEK IS ALSO CONTRIBUTED BY CEL(1094G) 
|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I2}. A{-2}=-0.006 {I6}, A{-4}=0.090 {I9} (1981Cr03) 
FOR 1093 DOUBLET: A2=-0.026 12, A4=0.021 16 (1980Wa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.15 {I15}, A{-4}=0.25 {I20} 
|a(K)exp=0.0013 {I8} (1981Cr03) gives |d(M2/E1)<0.2 
CEK=6.3 14 (1981Cr03). CEK IS ALSO CONTRIBUTED BY CEK(964G) AND CEL(912G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} 
|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I5} (1980Wa15) gives |d(E2/M1)=1.5 {I+9-4} but ce(K) line is a poorly resolved triplet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.44 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I5} (1981Cr03) 
A2=0.23 8, A4=-0.11 11 (1980Wa15) 
|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I8}(1981Cr03), 0.0080 {I30} (1980Wa15). |a(K)exp (1981Cr03) is consistent with mult=M1+E2, |d=0.7 {I+6-4} 
CEK=8.6 13 (1981Cr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR$|g(|q) gives |d=0.0 {I+9-3}; |a(K)exp (1981Cr03) gives |d<0.1 
A{-2}=0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1981Cr03) 
A2=0.37 5, A4=0.05 6 (1980Wa15) 
|a(K)exp=0.0008 {I4} (1981Cr03), 0.0020 {I10} (1980Wa15) 
CEK=2.5 10 (1981Cr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.48 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I4} (1981Cr03) 
A2=0.40 6, A4=-0.03 7 (1980Wa15) 
CEK=19.0 18 (1981Cr03). CEK IS CONTRIBUTED BY CEK(1001G)+CEK( 
|a(K)exp=0.0070 {I10} (1980Wa15). ce(K) line is poorly resolved triplet. 1001|g is assumed as E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1981Cr03) 
A{-2}=-0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=0.05 {I4} (1980Wa15) 
MR$|a(K)exp=0.0037 {I9} (1981Cr03) gives |d(M2/E1)=0.47 {I11} or |d(E2/M1)>1. |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I3} (1980Wa15) gives E1. |d=+1.0 {I2} allowed by |g(|q) is ruled out by |a(K)exp 
CEK=5.1 12 (1981Cr03). CEK IS ALSO CONTRIBUTED BY CEL(961G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.41 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} 
|a(K)exp=0.0055 {I28} (1981Cr03) gives M1,E2. |a(K)exp=0.0103 {I15} (1980Wa15) is larger by |?40% than that for M1 
CEK=1.9 10 (1981Cr03) 
M$from 1980Wa15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/100 n-captures=0.00386 {I19} (1988Su01) 
CEK/100 N-CAPTURES=0.0039 4 (1978La14) 
X(E0/E2)=0.029 {I2} (1988Su01), 0.028 {I4} (1978La14) 
|r=0.048 {I7} (1978La14), 0.049 {I8} (1988Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
I|g=1.6 (1988Su01) per 100 n-captures seems a misprint. It should read 2.6. 
|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I7}, |a(L1)exp=0.0009 {I1} 
X(E0/E2)=0.08 {I1} (1988Su01), <0.106 (1978La14) 
|r(E0)=0.95 {I11} (1988Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
Transition from 1988Su01. ce(K)/100 n-captures=0.0435 {I21} 
X(E0/E2)=15.6 {I12}, |r(E0)=0.043 {I5} (1988Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/100 n-captures=0.0278 {I11} (1988Su01) 
CEK/100 N-CAPTURES=0.0269 24 (1978La14) 
|r(E0)=0.014 {I2} (1986An14), 0.015 {I2} (1988Su01) 
X(E0/E2)=2.93 {I20} (1988Su01), 2.8 {I3} (1978La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.07 {I7} (1988Su01) per 100-n captures is large by a factor of 7 
|a(K)exp=0.03 {I3} gives D,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Deviation is |?0.15 keV 
|a(K)exp=0.0022 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.0005 {I2}, |a(L2)exp=0.0005 {I2} 
X(E0/E2)|<0.04 (1988Su01), <0.029 (1978La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/100 n-captures=0.00242 {I10} (1988Su01) 
CEK/100 N-CAPTURES=0.0021 2 (1978La14) 
X(E0/E2)=0.38 {I3} (1988Su01), 0.34 {I4} (1978La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0087 {I17} gives |d(E2/M1)=0.9 {I+7-4} but |DJ|p requires E2 
EKC=0.087 QUOTED BY 1985Ge02 SEEMS TO BE A MISPRINT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
ce(K)/100 n-captures=0.000509 {I20} (1988Su01) 
CEK/100 N-CAPTURES=0.0004 1 (1978La14) 
X(E0/E2)=0.14 {I1} (1988Su01), 0.10 {I3} (1978La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
5433.2G, RI=8.1 24 (1975Gr32) IS MOST LIKELY A COMPOSITE OF 5430.7G AND 5436.4G REPORTED BY 1985Ge02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.0475 {I88} for 4278|g-3741|g, 0.0226 {I69} for 4278|g-2701|g, 0.015 {I11} for 4278|g-2544|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.0618 {I87} for 4338|g-3682|g, 0.0310 {I76} for 4338|g-3605|g, 0.0147 {I58} for 4338|g-3682|g, 0.0202 {I68} for 4338|g-2563|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.0188 {I71} for 4462|g-2361|g, 0.037 {I14} for 4462|g-2403|g, 0.0405 {I78} for 4462|g-3480|g, 0.107 {I13} for 4462|g-3558|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.031 {I13} for 4524|g-2380|g, 0.046 {I24} for 4524|g-2454|g, 0.030 {I12} for 4524|g-3418|g, 0.0372 {I92} for 4524|g-3496|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.030 {I10} for 4636|g-2187|g, 0.0340 {I96} for 4636|g-2228|g, 0.023 {I12} for 4636|g-2267|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.0198 {I79} for 4759|g-2063|g, 0.0173 {I63} for 4759|g-2106|g, 0.0417 {I79} for 4759|g-3183|g, 0.218 {I24} for 4759|g-3261|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.081 {I15} for 5540|g-1282|g, 0.047 {I11} for 5540|g-1326|g, 0.069 {I15} for 5540|g-1363|g, 0.048 {I11} for 5540|g-1438|g, 2.17 {I18} for 5539|g-2480|g, 0.141 {I14} for 5540|g-2480|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g|g)=0.081 {I12} for 5826|g-997|g, 0.083 {I12} for 5826|g-2117|g, 0.0697 {I99} for 5826|g-1039|g, 0.076 {I12} for 5826|g-1077|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from L1:L2:L3=7.1 {I7}:10 {I1}:10 (1966Ha23). M1+E2 (with |d=0.54) is also consistent with |a(K)exp=9.0 {I7} (1963Or01) and |a(L)exp=4.7 {I20} (1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.047 {I7}, as deduced from I|g and Ice, normalized through |a(K)=0.0247 (E2 theory) for 398.9|g. E3 is precluded by high L1/(L2+L3) ratio (1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$magnitude from weighted average of 0.232 {I14} (L1:L2:L3, 1959Ha09), 0.256 {I10} (|g|g(|q), 1965Ho05), 0.220 {I9} (L1:L2:L3, 1976KaYV), and 0.187 {I11} (|g|g(|q), ce|g(|q), 1982Bu16); sign from nuclear orientation (1975Kr11,1983Kr18). Other values range from -0.14 to -0.26. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$magnitude from weighted average of 0.21 {I2} (K:L1:L2:L3, 1970BaYI), 0.19 {I2} (L1:L2:L3, 1969Ka34), 0.22 {I2} (nuclear orientation, 1983Kr18), and 0.201 {I19} (|g|g(|q), ce|g(|q), 1982Bu16); sign from nuclear orientation (1975Kr11,1983Kr18). Other values range from -0.12 to -0.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR$magnitude from average of |?0.039 (L1:L2, 1976KaYW), |?0.021 (|a(K)exp, 1970BaYI), |?0.031 (K:L1:L2:L3, 1970BaYI), and |?0.015 (|g|g(|q), ce|g(|q), 1982Bu16); sign from |g|g(|q), ce|g(|q) (1982Bu16). Other measurements indicate pure E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$pure E1 deduced from ce subshell ratios of 1959Ha09, 1969Ka34, and 1976KaYW. M2/E1<0.001 (from particle parameter, 1965Ho05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=2.7 {I4} (x-ray and |g intensity data, 1983Va20) and L1:L2:L3=0.83 {I23}:0.34 {I15}:0.41 {I9} (1970BaYI). |d=0.26 {I+6-7} from |a(L)exp and |d=0.30 {I5} from L1:L2:L3. |d=0.17 {I14} (1992Ad08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from energy difference between initial and final states (transition shown on level scheme, but not listed in table). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+E3(+M2)
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q), {+174}Lu |e decay (3.31 y). 
MR$from |g|g(|q). |d(M2/E1)=0.05 {I9}, |d(E3/E1)=0.19 {I8} in {+174}Lu (3.31 y) |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR |d=-1.6 {I+4-3} from {+174}Yb(n,n'|g) (1986Yo08). 
M from |a(K)exp, {+174}Lu |e decay (142 d). 
MR from |g|g(|q), {+174}Lu |e decay (142 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other values: 76.46 semi (1973Ko13), 76.6 scin (1960Wi03), 76.50 (1969Gu15). Others: 1959Di44, 1960Ha18, 1960Ro14, 1963Ba28, 1967Gi06, 1967Ka13, 1968Li01, 1969Ka19. 
RI other values: 58 scin (1960Wi03), 90 (1969Gu15). 
M from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=<53:260:290:160 (1969Ka19). Other values: ce(K):ce(L):ce(M) exp=200:590:130 (1967Gi06); ce(K):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=140:300:290:160 (1960Ro14); ce(K):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N)+ce(O) exp=64:300:290:155:45 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E other values: 1065 (1974Sc15), 1064.85 (1973Ko13). 
RI other value: 0.45 {I8} (1974Sc15). 
MR from |a(K)exp=0.0052 {I24} (1974Sc15,1969BaZK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+E3(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$other values: 1241.64 (1973Ko13), 1241.9 (1974Sc15), 1241.76 (1969Gu15), 1241.5 {I10} (1967Ka13), 1235 {I5} (1965Ri05), 1228 (1960Wi03). Others: 1959Di44, 1960Ha18, 1962Pr02, 1963Ba28. 
M the angular distribution coefficients for the 1242-76 |g cascade are A{-2}(1242|g)=-0.122 {I35} and A{-4}(1242|g)= -0.113 {I44}, |g|g(|q) (1974Sc15). Mixing ratios |d(M2/E3)=0.05 {I9} and |d(E3/E1)=0.19 {I8} are consistent with these coefficients and with |a(K)exp=0.00089 {I9} if the spins of the levels are 2, 2, 0, respectively. The angular correlation coefficients are A{-2}=+0.062 {I16} and A{-4}=+0.090 {I26} (1974Sc15). Other values: A{-2}=+0.064 {I28} and A{-4}=+0.032 {I46}, consistent with E1+M2 and |d=-0.25 {I4} if the spins of the levels are 2, 2, 0, respectively (1966Pr02). |d(1)=0.04 {I6} and |d(2)=0.20 {I7} are consistent with E1+E3+M2, and with A{-2}(1242|g)=-0.23 {I12} and |a(K)exp=0.00089 {I9} if the spins of the levels are 2, 2, 0, respectively, |g|g(|q) (1975Kr11). 
ce(K):ce(L):ce(M) exp=23:4:|?1 s (1963Ba28). |a(K)exp=0.00066 {I33} s, scin, |g|g coin (1962Pr02); |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I4} (1974Sc15,1969BaZK). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$other values: 1318.28 (1973Ko13), 1318.24 (1969Gu15). 1318 (1974Sc15); 1318 {I2} (1967Ka13). 
RI$other values: 1.3 (1969Gu15); 0.42 {I16} (2.6 quoted by 1973Mi30 is incorrect) semi (1967Ka13), 0.61 {I4} (1974Sc15). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I14} (1974Sc15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 76.41 {I4} (1969Ka19). 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(176|g), using |a(theory,E2)=9.46 for 76|g, and assuming no |e feeding to 76-keV level. I|g=16 (1987Va34). 
M from ce(L1)/ce(L2)/ce(L3) exp: <20/100/110 {I10}, ce(L)/ce(M) exp: 3.6 (1969Ka19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
ce(K)/(ce(L1)+ce(L2))exp=2.2 {I2} (1969Ka19). 
E other values: 175.9 {I6} (1967Ka13), 176.66 (1969Gu15), 176.44 {I4} (1969Ka19). 
RI other values: 71 (1969Gu15), 80 {I20} (1967Ka13). 
M from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
ce(K)/(ce(L1)+ce(L2))exp=3.7 {I7} (1969Ka19). 
E other values: 272.9 {I4} (1967Ka13), 272.87 (1969Gu15), 273.16 {I5} (1969Ka19). 
RI other values: 97 (1969Gu15), 95 {I10} (1967Ka13). 
M from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other values: 994 {I3}, ce(K):ce(L):ce(M) exp=17/3/1 (1963Ba28); 992.13 (1969Gu15), 991.7 {I6} (1967Ka13). 
M multipolarity is consistent with |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I5} measured in (d,p|g) (1967Bo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(1215|g)=1.93 {I9}, I|g(149|g)/I|g(1214|g)|?0.14 in {+174}Tm |b{+-} decay, and I|g(149|g doublet)=0.30 {I5}. 
M1+E2 assigned by 1987Ge01 is not consistent with |a(K)exp=0.128 36, |a(L1)exp=1.8 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=3.2 {I4}, and |a(L3)exp=2.6 {I3} are apparently typographical errors. In addition, M1+E2 is not consistent with decay scheme spin assignments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(410|g)(286|g)(|q): a{-2}=-0.28 {I7}, a{-4}=-0.09 {I10} 
$(410|g)(555|g)(|q): a{-2}=+0.17 {I4}, a{-4}=+0.06 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(696|g)(269|g)(|q): a{-2}=+0.34 {I6}, a{-4}=+0.14 {I8} 
$(696|g)(520|g)(|q): a{-2}=-0.186 {I27}, a{-4}=-0.01 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$per 100 neutron captures: 19.9 {I9} (17.6 eV), 19.6 {I17} (31.4 eV), 20.5 {I22} (45.2), 33.3 {I13} (4.5 eV), 40 {I3} (35.7 eV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$per 100 neutron captures: 1.4 {I2} (17.6 eV), 1.2 {I2} (31.4 eV), 1.0 {I3} (45.2), 5.4 {I3} (4.5 eV), 4.6 {I4} (35.7 eV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$per 100 neutron captures: 4.5 {I2} (17.6 eV), 4.6 {I3} (31.4 eV), 4.4 {I5} (45.2), 7.0 {I4} (4.5 eV), 7.4 {I5} (35.7 eV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$E2 character is consistent with the small (g{-K}-g{-R}) value for this band, as deduced from 127|g and 231|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g of 982.45|g not the highest in {+175}Tm |b{+-} decay, probably because of the doublet in 1970Ja20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$experimental value from transition intensity balance at 602 level. 
RI$from I|g(47|g)/I|g(602|g)=6.7 {I23} in {+174}Yb(n,|g) 
M$from |a=6.4 {I11}, assuming no direct |b{+-} feeding to 602 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from |g|g coin (1969Fu03). Line was masked in singles spectrum by 396|g from {+175}Yb |b{+-} decay (1969Fu03, 1970Ja20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.40 {I8} (1967Bo33), |a(exp)=0.42 {I9}, |a(K)exp=0.9 {I5} from K| x ray |g coin is consistent with E1 multipolarity (1965Ve01). |a=0.28 {I14}, deduced by evaluator from a transition-intensity balance at 954 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced by evaluator from %|e=0.057 {I11} to 82.1 level, given by authors, and |a(82.1|g, E2)=7.07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.03 {I8} A{-4}=+0.0 
E Presented as unplaced |g in Table 1, but placed under 1778.47 keV level in Table 2 in 1999De40. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=3.75 {I25} (1966Ve07) and |a(K)exp=4.1 {I4} (1960Ho10); ce(K):ce(L1)+ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=100:32:12:18:10 (1973PrZI). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
M$From ce(K):ce(L1)+ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=100:32:12:18:10 (1973PrZI). 
E$226.6 {I15}, using Ge(Li) detector (1973PrZI). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty of 5.0 keV in Table I of 2015Ta12 should be 0.5 keV, as confirmed in e-mail reply of June 10, 2015 from M. Taylor 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E Unobserved, but required by |g|g coincidences. 
TI From intensity balances at 2502 and 2481 levels in {+153}Lu IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E Unobserved, but required by |g|g coincidences. 
TI$From average of 47, to give intensity balance at 2481 level, and 53, to give balance at 2502 level, with uncertainty covering both values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$The large hindrance of this transition, as well as those of a number of other such transitions in neutron-deficient nuclides in this mass region, has been discussed by 2002Ma80 in the framework of an extended seniority reduction formalism involving three valence orbitals, together with significant proton excitation out of the {+146}Gd core. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$Shown by 1990Mc02 as M1 in their level scheme and presumably based on intensity-balance considerations, although this point is not specifically addressed by these authors. From intensity-balance considerations at the 1225+x, (11-) level, the evaluator computes |a(exp)=0.41~{I13}. This is consistent with mult=M1, although an admixture of E2 (for which |a=0.217) is not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$The large hindrance of this transition, as well as those of a number of other such transitions in neutron-deficient nuclides in this mass region, has been discussed by 2002Ma80 in the framework of an extended seniority reduction formalism involving three valence orbitals, together with significant proton excitation out of the {+146}Gd core. 
M$From intensity balance, |a(exp)=1.14~{I21} (1990Mc02). This indicates that mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$assumed by 2016Ca42 in {+102}Pd({+58}Ni,p|a|g) dataset: D, due to higher lifetimes expected from higher mult's, (M1) from better compatibilty with intensities of other transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$assumed by 2016Ca42: D, due to higher lifetimes expected from higher mult's, (M1) from better compatibilty with intensities of other transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
The DCO ratio indicates a dipole transition. From its high energy compared with the in-band M1 and E2 transitions, 2001Yi03 assume that this is rather E1 and, thus, that the two bands involved have opposite parity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.55 {I12} 
The DCO ratio indicates a dipole transition. From its competition with the intraband transitions, 2001Yi03 conclude that it is E1 and, thus, that the two bands involved have opposite parity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.64 {I16} 
The DCO ratio indicates a dipole transition. From its competition with the intraband transitions, 2001Yi03 conclude that it is E1 and, thus, that the two bands involved have opposite parity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$ the evaluator assumes that the isomer decays to 135.6+x, (5/2+) through an M2 transition. This energy is consistent with a low-energy transition, below the K-shell binding energy of 63 keV as postulated by 1973An10. Transitions to other levels will be higher in energy than the K-shell binding energy. The M2 transition rate is consistent with RUL(M2)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$ the evaluator assumes that the isomer decays to 135.8+x, (5/2+) through an M2 transition. This energy is consistent with a low-energy transition, below the K-shell binding energy of 63 keV as postulated by 1973An10. Transitions to 0+x or g.s. would be higher than the K-shell binding energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The ordering of 217.6-91.2 cascade follows from the work of 2006Br12 in {+139}La({+28}Si,6n|g) 
RI$corrected (by 1995Hi12) for the contribution of a 215.8 |g from the decay of {+160}Yb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g not reported by 2006Br12 in {+139}La({+28}Si,6n|g). The 522.6 and 525.6 |g rays in {+139}La({+28}Si,6n|g) are placed from negative-parity levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Branching ratio: I|g(654)/I|g(524)=2.0 {I7} 
$668.1-654.4 cascade is reversed in {+139}La({+28}Si,6n|g) (2006Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$668.1-654.4 cascade is reversed in {+139}La({+28}Si,6n|g) (2006Br12) 
$ Branching ratio: I|g(668)/I|g(519)=1.34 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 22 {I11} (1996Zh05) and 31 {I3} (1997Gu18). 1997Ca29 report 50 {I6} for this |g branch. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 134 {I13} (1997Gu18) and 125 {I13} (1997Ca29). 1996Zh05 report 83 {I14} for this |g branch. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI value corrected (by 1995Hi12) for the contribution from the 173.8|g from the {+160}Yb decay 
CC At 173.9 keV CC(E1)=0.0821, CC(E2)=0.446, and CC(M1)=0.765. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M from comparison of |g intensities in singles and coincidence spectra, 1995Hi12 conclude that |a(exp)|?30 for this transition. Since |a(E1)=3.83, |a(E2)=3374, and |a(M1)=48.9 for a 22.5|g, mult is most likely M1 (although an admixture of E2 cannot be excluded). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
CC At 410.1 keV, CC(E1)=0.00984, CC(E2)=0.0312, and CC(M1)=0.0744. So, the maximum of TI(410) is about equal to the minimum of TI(196). Thus, if TI(22) is small, I(EC) to 196 level could be 0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
1997Gu18 place a 582.4|g out of the (16+) level, but do not specifically identify the final state, other than to indicate that it is probably the same as that populated by the 788|g from the (17+) level. 1997Ca29 place their 788.4|g between the (17+) and the (16-) levels, which suggests to the evaluator that this is also the final state for the 582.4|g. This placement, however, is inconsistent with mult=Q reported by 1997Gu18. 1997Ca29 report a 583.1|g, but do not place it in the level scheme other than to say that it deexcites this band. The evaluator has chosen to assume that these two |g's are the same and has tentatively placed the transition out of the (16+) level. 
E average of 582.4 (1997Gu18) and 583.1 (1997Ca29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(908.2|g)/I|g(583.1|g)=0.096 (1997Ca29) and I|g(582.4|g)=85 {I12} (1997Gu18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(524.1|g)/I|g(206.2|g)=0.193 (1997Ca29) and I|g(206.2|g)=39 {I4} (1997Gu18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E average of 787.6 (1997Gu18) and 788.4 (1997Ca29). 
M from DCO ratios, the multipolarity is consistent with a stretched dipole. Arguing by analogy from the apparently similar situation in the neighboring {+161}Lu and {+163}Lu isotopes, 1997Ca29 assume that this transition is a stretched E1, which establishes the parity of this band relative to that (negative) of the yrast band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g computed by the evaluator from I|g(681.8|g)/I|g(398.9|g+192.9|g)=0.059 (1997Ca29) and I|g(398.9|g+192.9|g)=97 {I7} (1997Gu18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(726|g)/I|g(375|g)=1.6 {I2} (weighted average of 1.5 {I3} (1996Zh05) and 1.7 {I3} (1997Ca29)) and I|g(726|g)=46 {I5} (1997Gu18). 1997Gu18 report I|g(374|g)=42 {I5} but state that some portion of this intensity is to be assigned to the 374.5|g deexciting the (23-) level in this band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E |g not reported by 1996Zh14 
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(738|g)/I|g(374|g)=1.9 {I4} (weighted average of 1.9 {I5} (1997Ca29) and 1.7 {I10} (1996Zh05)) and I|g(738|g)=26 {I3} (1997Gu18). 1997Gu18 do not report an I|g value for this |g, stating simply that some portion of the intensity of the 374.1|g deexciting the (20-) level in this band is to be assigned to this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E 1996Zh05 show a 745.5 |g deexciting the (25-) level. 1996Ca03 show this |g (for which they report E|g=746) deexciting the (27-) level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(440.9|g+442|g)=26 {I6} for the two |g's deexciting the (28+) and (29+) levels (1997Gu18) and the I|g value deduced for the 443.0|g deexciting the (29+) level in this band (see the comment for this latter |g ). 1997Gu18 do not report the split in intensity for these two |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1997Ca29. 1997Gu18 report E|g=442 
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(883.9|g)/I|g(443.0|g)=1.5 {I4} and I|g(882.8|g)=18 {I4} (1997Gu18). 1997Gu18 report I|g=26 {I6} for the sum of the intensities of the 440.9 and 442|g's (deexciting the (28+) and (29+) levels, respectively) but do not divide this intensity between them. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI calculated from the |g branching (1.4 {I5}) from this level, as reported by 1997Ca29, and I|g(434.7|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E |g reported by 1997Ca29. 1997Gu18 show a (30+) level as questionable and deexciting via two questionable gammas having energies of 479 and 921 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$from comparison with I|g(71|g) in |g|g spectrum gated on 45|g 
$Observed, but not assigned, by 1982Br31 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from I|g(296)/I|g(330)=3.6 {I7}/16.3 {I16} and I|g(296)/I|g(271)=3.6 {I7}/9.3 {I11} (1999Do34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.22 {I24}; POL=-0.12 {I3} for 757.6+756.4 (2004Je03) 
$I|g(25|')/I|g(90|')=1.68 {I34} for doublet (2004Je03) 
M$|DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$I|g(25|')/I|g(90|')=0.49 {i10} (2002Je10); |d=-0.19 {I+8-12} is also possible but less likely from model considerations 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from {+146}Nd({+23}Na,5n|g),.. (1996Wa25). Other: 119.7 in {+121}Sb({+48}Ca,5n|g) (2007Br09). Evaluators assume that 118.8 and 119.7 correspond to the same transition 
M$|DJ=2, quadrupole from DCO ratio, RUL suggests E2 assuming the 130+x level is not isomeric 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$this 180.2|g must be different from 180.0|g from 203.3+x level populated in |e decay, since no 211.5|g is seen in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 40.2 {I23} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 31 {I7} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 37.5 {I16} from ({+19}F,4n|g). Other: 40 {I13} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 70.9 {I16} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 83 {I7} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 85.0 {I15} from ({+19}F,4n|g). Other: 109 {I9} from ({+16}O,4n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 98 {I5} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 82 {I20} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 104 {I5} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 75 {I25} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$from ({+19}F,4n|g). Others: 100 {I6} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 100 {I25} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 100 {I33} from ({+16}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 4.3 {I14} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 9.5 {I32} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 58.5 {I22} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 31 {I8} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 23.8 {I7} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 57 {I19} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 90 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 70 {I17} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 63.7 {I22} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 25.1 {I5} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 31 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 33.2 {I5} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 36 {I11} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 11.3 {I8} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 34 {I9} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 22.4 {I7} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 33 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 46 {I12} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 60.1 {I29} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 20.7 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 21.2 {I32} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 25.1 {I4} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 18 {I6} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 14.4 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 18 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 17.86 {I33} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 27 {I8} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 22.0 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 26 {I4} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 24.0 {I4} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 25 {I4} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 32.0 {I17} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 55 {I14} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 44.8 {I14} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 17.0 {I17} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 12.1 {I12} from ({+19}F,4n|g). Other: 2.8 {I9} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 11.6 {I5} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 13.3 {I33} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 15.3 {I4} from ({+19}F,4n|g), and 15 {I5} from ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from ({+31}P,4n|g). I|g(295.0)/I|g(579.7)=0.97 in ({+19}F,4n|g) is discrepant. This branching ratio is 0.18 {I6} in ({+16}O,4n|g). It seems that the relative intensity of the 579.7|g is too low by a factor of about 5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 72.6 {I15} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 49 {I13} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 49.5 {I10} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 83.0 {I25} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 47 {I12} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 69.3 {I15} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 77.3 {I19} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 87.1 {I17} from ({+19}F,4n|g). Other: I|g(244.1|g)/I|g(470.6|g)=100 {I25}/9.8 {I25} is significantly discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 60.2 {I18} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 58.4 {I14} from ({+19}F,4n|g). Other: 100 {I15} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 86.8 {I30} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 67.8 {I17} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 88.4 {I26} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 99.3 {I35} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 103 {I27} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 68.5 {I28} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 40.1 {I20} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 58 {I15} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 47.8 {I21} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 94.2 {I21} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 92 {I23} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 75.5 {I22} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 58.9 {I21} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 94 {I24} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 120 {I5} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 29.3 {I16} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 42 {I11} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 48.4 {I32} from ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 60.2 {I27} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 51 {I12} from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 90 {I4} from ({+19},4n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 29 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 52 {I16} from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: I|g(493|g)/I|g(892|g)=100 {I6}/53 {I5} from ({+19}F,4n|g) is significantly discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 974.78 {I31} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and ({+30}Si,4n|g) by 2004Sc14 is discrepant, however, it could correspond to 975.0|g from 10646.7+x, 71/2+ level in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$this gamma ray is not listed in Table 1 of 1995Sc39, but is listed in level-scheme Fig. 1 as 641. This |g is placed from the 4988+x level in ({+30}Si,4n|g) and adopted in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this |g could correspond to 628.8|g from 3823.8+x, 37/2- level or 629.6|g from 4453.4+x, 41/2- level in ({+30}Si,4n|g), from which the level scheme is adopted in Adopted Levels, Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1(+E2)]
decay_comment:
|g not observed but its existence is implied by |g|g coin data and presence of 139|g crossover transition; possibly highly converted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M3)
decay_comment:
E conversion lines at E(ce)=25.05 {I22} and 32.44 {I22} were interpreted as the L- and M-conversion lines of the isomeric M3 transition. L:M=36 {I20}:20 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E the conversion line at E(ce)=20.74 {I22} was interpreted as the M-conversion line of an E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI,M I|g=11.7 for multiplet; second component not identified by 1992Ho02. Authors assign mult=E1 based on intensity balance, but this may not be reliable because the 204|g is a multiplet. 
CC(E1)=0.0543. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|d(Q/D)=-1.9 {I+11-200} or -0.5 {I+5-8} (2005Am02) from DCO ratio, which is not listed by the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-3.1 {I+11-34} or -0.26 {I16} from DCO (2003Am01); authors support larger |d value in comparison to similar transitions of known mixing ratio in SD band of {+163}Lu. Note that 2003Am01 did list DCO value. DCO in 2015Ro27 seems consistent with |DJ=1, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-5.1 {I+16-25} or -0.07 {I7} from DCO (2003Am01); authors support larger |d value in comparison to similar transitions of known mixing ratio in SD band of {+163}Lu. Note that DCO value was not listed by 2003Am01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-3.9 {I+27-84} or -0.35 {I65} from DCO (2003Am01); authors support larger |d value in comparison to similar transitions of known mixing ratio in SD band of {+163}Lu. Note that DCO value was not listed by 2003Am01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.014 {I3}, as deduced from a simultaneous measurement of Ice(315.2|g) and I|g(315.2|g), using |a(L)=0.0823 (E2 theory) for 198.8|g in {+168}Yb for calibration of detector 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for a |g-ray energy of 310.0 keV, corresponding to unresolved 305.3|g from 305, 11/2+ level, and possibly mixed with 315|g in 7/2[523] band (an E1 |g reported from 315 level in {+167}Hf decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for a conversion line for 366.5|g, corresponding to 364.6|g from 694, 13/2+ level, and possibly mixed with L-conversion line of 315|g, the latter reported in {+167}Hf decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for a |g-ray energy of 226.3 keV, corresponding to unresolved 230.0|g from 934, 17/2+ level, and 221.1|g from 3044, 33/2+ level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for a conversion line for 504.7|g, corresponding to 510.2|g from 1444, 21/2+ level, and possibly mixed with another |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for a |g-ray energy of 226.3 keV, corresponding to unresolved 230.0|g from 934, 17/2+ level, and 221.1|g from 3034, 33/2+ level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement shown from 3437.7 level in Table IV of 2015Ro27 seems incorrect. The placement here follows from Fig. 1 in 2015Ro27 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Initial level: negative parity in Table IV of 2015Ro27 is a misprint, it should be positive as in level-scheme Fig. 1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for a conversion line for 691.5|g, probably corresponding to 693.0|g from 5349, 49/2- level, and mixed with an unknown 687|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$listed as 3 in table IV of 2015Ro27 (or 0.3 for revised normalization here). Evaluators assume that it is meant to be |<3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Final level: J|p=(81/2+) in Table IV of 2015Ro27 is a misprint, it should be (83/2+) as in authors' level-scheme Fig. 1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$|g|g-coin indicates that this |g is a doublet, but placement of other component could not be determined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$a 324|g unplaced in ({+3}He,5n|g) (1977Ba40); not seen in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) (2015Ro27). The evaluators consider this placement questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$doublet with 537|g from 2152.5+x level; this placement not seen other studies and not adopted in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$could correspond to the 560.6|g from 3814.8,(37/2+) and the 559.8|g from 3254.3,(33/2+) level in Adopted Gamma 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$probably corresponds to 760.0|g from 4373.5,(41/2-) level or the 765.1|g from 5907.4,(49/2-) level in Adopted Gammas 
$DCO for doublet, 765|g being self-coincident 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$could correspond to the 701.8|g from 5778.0,(49/2+), 704.2|g from 5125.6,(43/2+), or 706.1|g from 4521.2,(39/2+) level from two neighboring bands in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$could correspond to the 798.7|g from 7328.3,(57/2+) level, or 801.8|g from 6388.3,(53/2+) level in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$could corresponds to the 853.5|g from 7241.7,(57/2+) level, or 854.5|g from 8182.9,(61/2+) level in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$not seen in other studies (1990Yu01,2015Ro27) 
RI$deduced from I(243|g):I(122|g)=28.7:17.1 in {+170}Yb(p,4n|g) and I(243|g) in ({+3}He,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$212.8 in Table 1 of 1977Ba40, but 212.3 in authors' Fig. 3 and text; also in Table 1 and Fig. 1 of 1974Fo19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$212.8 in Table 1 of 1977Ba40, but 212.3 in authors' Fig. 3 and text; also in Table 1 and Fig. 1 of 1974Fo19 
RI$for 211.6+212.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$for triply-placed |g. Negligible intensity is expected from its possible placement from 2532 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1997Ba26; 202.5 {I4} in 1999Ba65, 202.8 in 1966Ha23. 
M transition is significantly converted (1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR from 1997Ba26; |a(exp)|?4.8 from intensity balance. Other: Ice(K)=100; K:L1:M=100:15:4 (1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR from 1997Ba26; |a(exp)|?7 from intensity balance. Other: Ice(K)|?90 for doublet; L1:M=18:5 (1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR from 1997Ba26. Ice(K)=19, K/L1=5.4 (1966Ha23); probably for 159.7|g+159.4|g doublet dominated by 159.7|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M DCO=0.46 {I3} (2002Ha33). 
Incorrectly indicated as a J|p=(11-) to J=(6) transition in table I of 2002Ha33; in fig. 3, it deexcites a (7-) level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M DCO=0.94 {I6} (2002Ha33). 
RI stated uncertainty of 0.6 is atypically low and evaluator assumes that it is a misprint for 6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
0.5<(L1+L2)/L3|<0.8 
M (L1+L2)/L3 is consistent with E2 or E3. The lifetime, compared to the Weisskopf estimate, corresponds to a retardation of 1|*10{+9} times for E2 and about 1|*10{+3} times for E3, and thus strongly favors E3 (1965Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI since negligible |e+|b{++} feeding of the 97 level is expected (|DJ|p=2, no), the level scheme implies I(|g+ce)(16|g)|?I(|g+ce)(68|g)=3.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from fig. 2b (coincidence spectra gated by 593|g or 137|g) and fig. 3 (part I); absent in table 1a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E|g is for doublet. I|g for this component is not stated in 1993Og01; authors assume it will be such that B(M1)/B(E2) for the intraband |DJ=1 and |DJ=2 transitions from the 683 level will be consistent with expected value of |?1.5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E From fig. 3 (Part II); absent in table 1. Note that labels for 565.6|g and 677.6|g were mistakenly interchanged on level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from gated spectra (table 1b of 1993Og01); 7.9 {I3} in table 1a appears to be a typographical error. 
DCO=1.09 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=1.92. 
M from strong intensity and retardation (T{-1/2}|>100 ns; value attributed to B. Skanberg in private communication to 1973Fo03). Multipolarities other than E1 would require 68.4|g to be at least four times more intense than any other transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=1.06 (for 146.8|g and 147.2|g combined). 
RI deduced from I|g<42.8 (for 146.8|g and 147.2|g combined), I|g(270.5|g)/I|g(147.2|g)|?1.24, and I|g(270.5|g)=31.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=0.68. Entire I|g is shown with this placement because alternative placement in uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI 23.1, I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=2.42 for |g arising largely from {+171}Lu. 
RI see comment with 169.1|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=0.65 (for 188.8|g and 189.2|g combined). 
RI deduced from I|g=100.0 (for 188.8|g and 189.2|g combined), I|g(358.3|g)/I|g(189.2|g)|?3.49, and I|g(358.3|g)=34.9. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI for 315.7|g and 316.2|g combined. 
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=0.76 (for 315.7|g and 316.2|g combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI for 107.0|g and unplaced 107.8|g combined. 
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=0.94 (for 107.0|g and unplaced 107.8|g combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI for 275.0|g and unplaced 276.3|g combined. 
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=1.45 (for 275.0|g and unplaced 276.3|g combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 14.8 for 161.3|g and unplaced 162.6|g combined. 
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=0.65 (for 161.3|g and unplaced 162.6|g combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 33.8 for 430.6|g and 431.7|g combined. 
I|g(E(p)=30 MeV)/I|g(E(|a)=50 MeV)=0.16 (for 430.6|g and 431.7|g combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 98.55 {I10} in |e decay and 98.55 {I5} in ({+11}B,5n|g). 
RI,M from |e decay. Some E2 admixture indicated by DCO ratio and intensity balance in ({+11}B,5n|g), inconsistent with 1+ to 0+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1(+E2)]
decay_comment:
E$Masked by K|b| x ray(Lu) in ({+11}B,5n|g); existence inferred from spectra coincident with 140|g and 101|g, and from distortion of x-ray intensity relations in spectra coincident with 60.5|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+(M3)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI,M,MR ce subshell ratios in |e decay are consistent with E2+M3 or M1+E2 multipolarity; I|g was calculated from Ice in |e decay assuming E2+M3 and |d|?0.03 (so |a|?25800). The M1+E2 option was rejected because band structure deduced in ({+11}B,5n|g) requires a |DJ=2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 70.42 {I10} in |e decay and 70.36 {I6} in ({+11}B,5n|g). 
RI,M from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$existence of |g inferred from observed distortion of Lu x-ray intensity relations in ({+11}B,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=910:90:390:280:40:110:100 (1969Tr02) 
RI 0.0871, from Ice=19.50 (1969Tr02) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2+(M3)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M1:M2:M3:N:O=32:180:250:100:20 (1969Tr02) 
RI 0.00087, from Ice=22.0 (1969Tr02) and |a=25200. 
M,MR from subshell ratios, |g is predominantly E2. Authors assign M1+E2 with |d=2.0. However the subshell ratios are also consistent with E2+M3, |d|?0.03 (from M1:M2). The latter is adopted for consistency with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$K:L1=180:35 (1969Tr02) 
RI 3.5 {I4} in 1970Ch17, but this may include I(115|g). 
M E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp, but K/L1=5 cf. 10 and 7 for E2 and M1, respectively, favors M1; feeds 0+ state so cannot be M1+E2. I(ceK) probably includes ce(M1) of 55.2|g (1969Tr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=1270:215:150:320:80:80 (1969Tr02) 
MR from L1/L3. however, subshell ratios are not mutually consistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
$K:L1:M=480:53:18 (1969Tr02) 
RI$other: 18.8 {I19} in 1970Ch17 for (208.1|g+209.3|g). 
MR 0.3 {I+5-3} from K/M; 0.7 {I4} from L1/M. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$K:L1+L2=270:41 (1969Tr02) 
M,MR |a(L12)exp midway between E1 and E2,M1 theory; mult=M1+E2 from |a(K)exp, but E2 component inconsistent with placement; inconsistency attributable to interference from ce(N)(99.9|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$K:L=3.3:0.6 (1969Tr02) 
ce(K)/ce=0.86 
I(ce)|?0.04 (1969Tr02) (from ce(K)+ce(L)=0.039). 
M ce is observed, but |g is not (1969Tr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp, mult=M1(+E2) or E1+M2 with |d=0.55; from decay scheme, |D|p=yes if mult(757|g)=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from DCO=0.74 {I5} and intensity balance, 1999Le45 assign M1+E2, inconsistent with J|p=1+ to 0+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E rounded value from Adopted Gammas. Transition included in fig. 2 of 1999Le45, but not in table I. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed by subtracting (246|g and 169|g)-|g coin spectrum from (246|g and 98.5|g)-|g coin spectrum. 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from intensity balance; DCO ratio analysis indicates a |DJ=0 transition (1999Le45; DCO ratio not reported). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1(+E2)]
decay_comment:
E$Masked by K|b| x ray(Lu). Existence inferred from spectra coincident with 140|g and 101|g, and from distortion of x-ray intensity relations in spectra coincident with 60.5|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E 565.0 in Fig. 1 and 569.8 {I2} in table I of 1999Le45; 565.76 {I11} expected based on sum of relevant cascade transition energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E 384.5 {I4} expected from sum of relevant cascade E|g values. E|g=363.2 {I3} in table I and E|g=363.2 in fig. 1 of 1999Le45. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from BrIccMixing using K/L3 ratio from |e decay and |d from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (analysis by 1976Kr21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of 0.35 {I11} from |a(K)exp in |e decay and +0.44 {I3} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (analysis by 1976Kr21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 70 {I35} from |e decay, 19 {I6} from (|a,2n|g). 
M D from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E|g is for possible doublet. Placement supported by coincidence data in |e decay; however, this transition is absent in ({+19}F,|a4n|g), and |g|g coin data indicate that, in |e decay, the more intense component of the doublet deexcites the 788 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E|g is for possible doublet; placement supported by coincidence data in |e decay. However, absence of this transition in ({+19}F,|a4n|g) (which also excites this level) renders this placement questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$intensity observed in (|a,2n|g) suggests transition should have been seen in ({+19}F,|a4n|g), however, it was not observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$intensity observed in (|a,2n|g) suggests transition should have been seen in ({+19}F,|a4n|g), however, it was not observed thus transition is considered tentative by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from Adopted Gammas. 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M from |a(L)exp. 
|a(K)exp=3.0 {I10} (I|g(K| x ray)/I|g (1965Bj01)); |a(L)exp=400 {I150} ((Ice(L)/I|g and (Ice(L)/I|g(K| x ray) (1965Bj01)), |a(L)exp=500 {I80} (simultaneous I|g and Ice measurements (1969Gi06)); L2/L3=0.93 {I10} (1970Gi03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced from energy difference between 72.8 and 71.2 levels 
TI intensity required to achieve intensity balance at the 71 level (|e+|b{++} feeding of 71 level not expected; |DJ=3). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g/I|g(469|g)=2.3 {I3} in 1970Gi03; I|g=320 {I100} in 1974Gn02. 
|a(K)exp=1.3, K/L3=24.9 {I10}, L1:L2:L3=100:43:28 (1970Gi03). 
MR$adopted value; deduced using K/L3 from 1970Gi03 and +0.45 {I3} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (analysis by 1976Kr21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
TI intensity required to achieve intensity balance at the 221 level (|e+|b{++} feeding of 71 level not expected; |DJ=2, |D|p=no). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.18 (1970Gi03). 
RI deduced from total I|g=6.0 {I20} for both placements and I|g=1.2 {I8} for 295.6-level placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=2.6, L1:L2:L3=13.3:2.8:1, K/L3=108 {I15} (1970Gi03). 
MR$adopted value; deduced using K/L3 from 1970Gi03 and +0.12 {I5} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (analysis by 1976Kr21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from coincidence data; I|g=10.8 {I20} for 224.0|g+225.5|g (1974Gn02). 
|a(K)exp|?0.18 (Ice(K) from 1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from coincidence data; I|g=34 {I4} for 194.3|g+193.0|g (1974Gn02). 
|a(K)exp|?0.25 (1970Gi03) for 194|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from coincidence data; I|g=10.8 {I20} for 224.0|g+225.5|g (1974Gn02). 
|a(K)exp|?0.09 for doublet (Ice(K) from 1966Ha23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR adopted values; |a(K)exp=0.32 (1970Gi03) exceeds |a(K)(M1)=0.172 and disagrees with |a(K)exp=0.09 {I1} measured in {+169}Tm(|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp|?0.21 (1970Gi03) for 193|g. 
RI from coincidence data; I|g=34 {I4} for 194.3|g+193.0|g (1974Gn02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g(|q) (1976Kr21), and applied to 742.9-level placement only. 1973Ke10 (in (|a,2n|g) suggest that different |g ray depopulates 220.8 level). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I|g=14.4 {I20}, |a(K)exp=0.020 for doubly-placed line (1974Gn02). From |g|g coin, the stronger component belongs with this placement. Thus, 6.2|<I|g|<16.4 from this level and I|g|<8.2 from the 519 level; the evaluator assigns I|g=11 {I5} and I|g=4 {I4}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_comment:
CC based on |a(K)exp. 
|a(K)exp=0.050 (1970Gi03). 
Based on |g|g coin, 1974Gn02 suggest that |g is a doublet with only half of its I|g belonging to this placement. No alternative placement is indicated, however. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 4.5 {I20} for doubly-placed line (1974Gn02). From |g|g coin, the stronger component belongs with this placement. Thus, 1.25|<I|g|<6.5 from this level and I|g|<3.25 from the 593 level; the evaluator assigns I|g=3.9 {I26} and I|g=1.6 {I16}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E corrected value (from private communication between evaluator and first author of 1998Bb02); published value of 277.91 {I18} is not correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.6 {I4}. 
M$DCO is inconsistent with proposed stretched Q character as suggested by the J|p assignments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I4} (1973Gr23). L3/(L1+L2)=0.06 {I2} (1978Gu18). A{-2}=+0.07 {I1} (1973Ke10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(220.1|g), I|g(306.4|g), and adopted relative photon branchings from 379.4 level. I|g=16 for doublet. 
A{-2}=+0.08 {I2} (1973Ke10) for 172.9|g+172.4|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.75 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.12 {I2} (1973Gr23) (Ice for 171.0|g+171.4|g). A{-2}=+0.31 {I2} (1973Ke10) for 171.0|g+171.4|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI combined value for 124.3|g and 124.7|g. 
|a(M)exp=0.10 {I2} for doublet (1973Gr23). A{-2}=-0.02 {I2} (1973Ke10) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.46 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.06 {I3} (1973Gr23) for 193.9|g doublet. 
RI deduced from I|g(225.3|g) and relative photon branchings from 559.3 level in {+171}Hf |e decay. I|g=27 for doublet. 
A{-2}=+0.14 {I3} (1973Ke10) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.46 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.06 {I3} (1973Gr23) for 193.9|g doublet. 
RI deduced from total I|g=27 for both placements and I|g|?8.7 for 558.9-level placement. 
M A{-2}=+0.14 {I3} (1973Ke10) for doublet dominated by 634.2-level placement; (E2) determined for 559.3-level placement in {+171}Hf |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI 4.4 {I13} at E|a=23.5 MeV, |q=90|' (1973Gr23). May be a doublet; I(540|g)/I(662|g)=0.51 is much larger than adopted value (0.13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.75 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.12 {I2} (1973Gr23) (Ice for 171.0|g+171.4|g). A{-2}=+0.31 {I2} (1973Ke10) for doublet. 
M probable value consistent with ce and angular distribution data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.80 {I20}, |a(L)exp=0.07 {I3} (1973Gr23). 
RI deduced from total I|g=16 for 172.3|g+172.9|g and total I|g=2.1 for 172.9|g. 
A{-2}=+0.08 {I2} (1973Ke10) for 172.3|g+172.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E placement from 1973Gr23. Probably a doublet. 
I(454|g doublet)I(237|g)=4.3 {I21}:1.8 {I11} at E|a=23.5 MeV and |q=90|' (1973Gr23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1962Va07) 
RI$I(|g+ce)/(1+|a) 
M$from L-subshell ratios in {+172}Hf |e decay (1966Ha23,1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1962Va07) 
TI$from I(|g+ce)(of |g's to 41.86 level) 
RI$I(|g+ce)/(1+|a) 
M$from L-subshell ratios. |d(E4/M3)<0.03 
L1:L2:L3:M:N=450:50:1300:665:160 (1966Ha23) 
L1:L2:L3:M1:M3:N1:N3=530:65:1250:125:375:40:125 (1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from L-subshell ratios. |d(M2/E1)<0.008 
L1:L2:L3:M:N=520:440:750:400:100 (1966Ha23) 
L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=600:440:780:130:90:160:80 (1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from L-subshell ratios and |a(L1)exp=1.8 
L1:L2:L3:M=53:<45:|?6:15 (1966Ha23) 
L1:L2=70:56 (1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=2.0, |a(L1)exp=0.28. |d(E2/M1)<0.6 
K:L1:M=175:25:7 (1966Ha23). ce(L3) is weak 
K:L1:M=170:25:10 (1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
TI$|a(K)=79 and I|g<0.4 gives I(|g+ce)<32. Normalized ce(M)>12.5 gives I(|g+ce)>16 
ce(M)>50 (relative to 650 for ce(K)(126|g)) (1966Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from L-subshell ratios and |a(K)exp=7.0 
K:L1:L2:L3:M=1100:200:23:5:55 (1966Ha23) 
K:L1:L2:M1=1050:150:20:40 (1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from L-subshell ratios 
K:L1:L2:L3:M=650:100:14:4:32 (1966Ha23) 
K:L1:L2:M:N=600:100:15:40:17 (1962Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp|?1.7. |d(E2/M1)<0.7 
L1:M=68:<22 (1966Ha23). Weak L2 line 
RI$deduced by 1979To18 from ce(L1) (1966Ha23) and |a(L1) (for M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$deduced from intensity balance at 123.7 level. 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from M2/M3|?0.6 (1962Va06). M/M+N+=0.75 (theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.013 {I5}, determined from I|g and Ice (relative) compared with {+137}Cs counterparts (used as standard) (1962Va06); |a(K)exp=0.013 was also determined with the internal-external conversion technique (1962Va06). |a(K)(E1 theory)=0.0178. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from assumed multipolarity and I(|g+ce)=46 {I6}, as obtained by comparing I|g(540.2|g) in singles spectrum with I|g measured in coincidence with 297.0|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E other values: 44.7 (1967Gi06), 44.65 (1960Ha18), 44.681 {I20} (1975Ki06), 44.73 {I2} (1969Ka19). 
RI other value: 2037 {I44} (1975Ki06). 
M,MR$from ce(L1)+ce(L2)/ce(L3) exp=37.7 {I40}, ce(L1)/ce(L3) exp=28 {I2} (1969Ka19). Other data reported: ce(L3)/ce(L) exp=0.028 {I3}, ce(L):ce(M):ce(N)+ce(O) exp=2410 {I50}:558 {I11}:128 {I2} (1967Gi06). Other values: ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=580 {I10}:100:52 {I2}, ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(M4)+ce(M5) exp=1000 {I100}:100:40 {I10}:50 {I10} (1969Ka19); ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M): ce(N) exp=1290:160:ap65:350:115 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other values: 67.075 {I25} (1975Ki06), 67.08 {I2} (1969Ka19), 67.10 (1969Gu15), 67.1 (1967Gi06), 67.05 (1960Ha18). 
RI$other value: 1107 (1969Gu15). Other: 1975Ki06. 
MR$from ce(L1)/ce(L3) exp=20 {I2} (1969Ka19). Sign from |g(|q,H,t) (1975Kr11). Other data reported: ce(L1)/ce(L2) exp=3-10, ce(M1)/ce(M2) exp=2.7 5 (1969Ka19). Other values: ce(K):ce(L):ce(M) exp=1230-2415:335 {I10}:68 {I3} (1967Gi06); ce(L1)/ce(L)+ce(M) exp=3.4 s (1960Ha18). |d >0 |g(|q,H,t) (1975Kr11). 
M from |a(K)exp=10.25 {I58} (1974Vi05). Other value: 11.01 {I44} (1975Ki06). This latter measurement was performed using a source produced by {+175}Lu(n,2n). Although authors have corrected the measured K| x ray intensity for x-ray fluorescence in the source, the correction may not have completely removed this contribution, causing an |?7% increase in the value of |a(K)exp. |a(K)exp=10.30 {I26} (1987Va34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other values: 111.66 (1969Gu15), 111.7 {I1} (1975Ki06), 111.8 (1967Gi06). 
RI$other values: 60 (1969Gu15), 51 {I3} (1975Ki06), 59 {I2} (1984Ke13). 
M from |a(L)(exp)=1.5 {I2}, calculated by evaluator assuming 67|g is M1+0.8% E2 using ce(L) from 1967Gi06 and I|g from 1987Va34. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$from 1969Ka19, 1987Va34. Other values: 59.1 (1967Gi06); 59.05 (1960Ha18). 
RI from intensity balance, I(|g+ce)(59|g)=17545 {I614}, and |a (theory,M3)=3320. 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=720 {I20}:100:1630 {I30} (1969Ka19). Other data reported: ce(M1)/ce(M3) exp=0.7 {I1} (1969Ka19). Other values: ce(L):ce(M):ce(N)+ce(O) exp=2570:717 {I20}:195 {I5} s (1967Gi06); ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=780:<180:1610:670:240 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E4]
decay_comment:
E from 1967Gi06, 1987Va34. 
RI$from intensity balance, I(|g+ce)(126|g)=754 {I529}, |a(theory, E4)=266. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(67|g)/I|g(111.7)=25:1.2 in (p,3n|g) (1987Br12) and I|g(67|g)=15.0 {I10} in ({+7}Li,3n|g) (1987Br31) because 1987Br31 reported I|g(111.6|g)=99.0 was mainly an impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=1.98 {I5} (weighted average of 2.07 {I6} (1966As02), 1.94 {I20} (1969Ni01), 1.80 {I18}, 1.90 {I8} (1970Re08), and 1.82 {I15} (1974Co18)) and K:L1:L2:L3 exp=674 {I4}:100.0 {I3}:41.5 {I8}:31.0 {I4} (1969Ni01). 
MR$Weighted average of +0.465 {I5} (1975Qu02) and 0.45 {I2} (1981Sk01). |d=0.468 {I20} deduced by evaluator from least-squares fit of |a(K)exp and K:L1:L2:L3 exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=1.19 {I8} (1966As02), K/L exp=4.3 {I5} (1960Be16). 
MR$weighted average 0.51 {I2} (1976Kr21) and 0.45 {I2} (1981Sk01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.096 {I8}, (weighted average of 0.084 {I6} (1966Ha04), 0.101 {I15} and 0.106 {I16} (1970Re08) and 0.114 {I8} (1971Gr41)) and K:L1:L2 exp=114 {I8}: 122 {I11}:28 {I6} (1971Gr41). Weak experimental evidence of nuclear penetration effects (1966Ha04,1971Gr41). 
MR$from 1972Kr18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I1} (weighted average of 0.022 {I1} (1966Ha04), 0.0248 {I24}, 0.0262 {I18} (1970Re08), 0.0212 {I12} (1971Gr41)) and K:L1:L2:L3 exp=100 {I2}:15.0 {I4}:3.60 {I24}:1.66 {I17} (1971Gr41). Possible nuclear penetration effects. (|l{-1}=-8.35 |l{-2}=170, see 1969Ha61,1976Mi07). 
MR$from 1972Kr18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0380 {I20} (weighted average of 0.037 {I2} (1966Ha04), 0.0422 {I30}, 0.0445 {I32} (1970Re08), 0.0349 {I21} (1971Gr41)) and K:L1:L2:L3 exp=100:15.4 {I3}:1.81 {I5}:0.33 {I4} (1971Gr41). Nuclear penetration effects |l{-1}=12.5 |l{-2}=53 (1969Ha61,1976Mi07). 
MR$from 1972Kr18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.090 {I4} (weighted average of 0.102 {I8} (1962Ba31), 0.092 {I5} (1966Se01) and 0.086 {I4} (1967Er01)) and |a(L1)exp=0.0121 {I5} |a(L2)exp=0.00115 {I7} and |a(L3)exp=0.00028 {I2} (1967Er01). 
MR$from 1976Kr21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) (A{-2}=-0.20 {I28}) the following limits are obtained: -0.3|<|d|<0.1 or -30|<|d|<-2 (1962De02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E This entry from authors' table, according to the numerical order of the table it may be a typo for 2943|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E In table 1 (2004Ga04), |g is presented as depopulating the 7/2+ level at 773.0 keV. This seems to be a typo. In the decay scheme 413.7|g is shown depopulating the 5/2+ state at 757.1 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition not observed, but expected from decay of the 1/2[541] rotational band. E|g is from E(level). Photons in the spectrum would be masked by the K| x ray peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Placement of 203.4|g is from a questionable (6+) state at 838.61 keV in (n,|g) thermal. In (p,n|g), it is placed from 5- state at 838.64 keV. Evaluator adopts this E|g from 5- state, based on relocation of the bandhead 5+ at 657.13 keV, of which (+6) state was a member in (n,|g) thermal, and questionable (6+) level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)=9 {I4} is consist with both M1(9.51) and E2(12.2). The M1 alternative would imply a reduced transition strength of 1.3 x 10{+-7} W.u., more than two orders of magnitude weaker than expected for a K-allowed M1 transition. In contrast, the assumption of E2 multipolarity implies a reduced transition strength within the expected range. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E not adopted based on the placement from a questionable level, which is not adopted and 0.020 intensity, which is labeled as close to detector sensitivity limit for many |g-rays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Assumed for transition level spin and parities. The |a(exp)=9 {I4} value consistent with both M1(9.51) and E2(12.2). The M1 would imply a reduced transition strength of 1.3 x 10{+-7} W.u., more than two orders of magnitude weaker than expected for a K-allowed M1 transition. In contrast, the assumption of E2 multipolarity implies a reduced transition strength within the expected range. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.105 {I10} A{-4}=+0.012 {I13} (1987De35). 
Branching ratio=I|g(388.8)/I|g(204.7)=0.89 {I5} (1987De35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Constrained by the 2- to 1- transition as noted in the email reply, where the second author states that this transition could be a M1 or E2 or a mix of both 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Constrained by the 2+ to 1+ transition as noted in the email reply, where the second author stated that this transition could be a M1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A misprint in 2016Ba28 in Table 1 indicating that this |g populates a 2- state in {+176}Lu which instead should be a 2+ as shown in Fig.11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M$M2 was assigned in 2016Ba28 based on the authors' |a(K)exp. However using BrICC, the |a(K) for a M2 transition is 0.443 {I8}, hence the compilers have not included the mult in the compilation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M$M1 was assigned in 2016Ba28 based on the authors' |a(K)exp. However using BrICC, the compilers cannot rule out E1 or E2 multipolarites. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) (1964Kr01,1974Kr12), |a(K)exp=1.41 {I9} (2012De24) (K/L1)exp=3.6 {I3}, (K/L1)exp=7.2 {I6} and (K/L1)exp=10.8 {I12} (1972Ag05); |a(K)exp=2.2 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.31 {I12}, |a(L2)exp=0.16 {I6}, |a(L3)exp=0.11 {I4}, |a(M2)exp=0.041 {I15} and |a(M3)exp=0.024 {I9} (1996Pe05); (K/L)exp=4.5 {I6} and ((L1+L2))/L3)exp=4.5 {I6} (1964Jo03); |a(K)exp=1.43, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.31, |a(L3)exp=0.086, |a(M)exp=0.11 and |a(N)exp=0.026 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.54 {I7} (1974Kr12) and 0.49 {I4} (1964Kr01), and |a(K)exp=1.41 {I9} (2012De24). The sign is from 1974Kr12. Others (not used in the analysis): (K/L1)exp=3.6 {I3}, (K/L1)exp=7.2 {I6} and (K/L1)exp=10.8 {I12} (1972Ag05); |a(K)exp=2.2 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.31 {I12}, |a(L2)exp=0.16 {I6}, |a(L3)exp=0.11 {I4}, |a(M2)exp=0.041 {I15} and |a(M3)exp=0.024 {I9} (1996Pe05); (K/L)exp=4.5 {I6} and ((L1+L2))/L3)exp=4.5 {I6} (1964Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$An anomalous E1 transition (see 1972Ag05 for details). |a(K)exp=0.61 {I12}, |a(L1)exp=0.122 {I23}, |a(L2)exp=0.047 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.028 {I5}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.32, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.09, |a(L3)exp=0.004, |a(M)exp=0.0029 and |a(N)exp=0.0011 (1971Ma45). 
CC$Experimental value of |a{-tot}=0.512 {i32} (1972Ag05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) (1974Kr12,1995Ya21); |a(K)exp=0.91 {I9} (2012De24), (K/L)exp=4.5 {I6} and ((L1+L2)/L3)exp=4.6 {I6} (1964Jo03); |a(K)exp=1.1 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.032 {I9}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.66, |a(L1+L2)exp=0.12, |a(L3)exp=0.015, |a(M)exp=0.045 and |a(N)exp=0.0097 (1971Ma45); |a(K)exp=1.22 {I54} (1972Ag05) 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.54 {I+12-9} (1974Kr12), |a(K)exp=0.91 {I9} (2012De24), (K/L)exp=4.5 {I6} and ((L1+L2)/L3)exp=4.6 {I6} (1964Jo03). The sign is from 1974Kr12. 
MR$Others (not used in the analysis): |a(K)exp=1.1 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.032 {I9}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05); |d(|g|g(|q))=0.58 {I+13-15} (1995Ya21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0686 {I11}, |a(L1)exp=0.0070 {I12}, |a(L2)exp=0.0135 {I23}, |a(L3)exp=0.0151 {I26}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0032 {I6} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.09, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.02, |a(L3)exp=0.006, |a(M)exp=0.0049 and |a(N)exp=0.0011 (1971Ma45); |a(L)exp=0.020 {I2} (2012De24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) (1973Il02,1995Ya21); |a(K)exp=1.6 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.22 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.029 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0097 {I23} and |a(M1)exp=0.048 {I12}, |a(K)exp=1.17 {I16}, |a(L1)exp=0.20 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.028 {I8}, (1996Pe05); |a(L3)exp=0.014 {I7} (1972Ag05); (K/L)exp=5 {I1} (1964Jo03); |a(K)exp=1.12, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.19, |a(L3)exp=0.016, |a(M)exp=0.06 and |a(N)exp=0.025 (1971Ma45) 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=0.18 {I4} (1995Ya21), |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.28 {I6} (1973Il02), |a(K)exp=1.6 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.22 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.029 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0097 {I23} and |a(M1)exp=0.048 {I12} (1996Pe05) and |a(K)exp=1.17 {I16}, |a(L1)exp=0.20 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.028 {I8}, |a(L3)exp=0.014 {I7} (1972Ag05); (K/L)exp=5 {I1} (1964Jo03) The sign is from 1973Il02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) (1974Kr12); |a(K)exp=0.61 {I7} (2012De24); |a(L1)exp=0.055 {I18}, |a(L2)exp=0.073 {I20}, |a(L3)exp=0.017 {I6}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0127 {I25} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.55, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.10, |a(L3)exp=0.02, and |a(M)exp=0.0037 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.59 {I+31-15} (1974Kr12) and |a(K)exp=0.61 {I7} (2012De24). The sign is from 1974Kr12. Others (not used in the analysis): |a(K)exp=0.74 {I12}, |a(L1)exp=0.055 {I18}, |a(L2)exp=0.073 {I20}, |a(L3)exp=0.017 {I6}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0127 {I25} (1996Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.038 {I7}, |a(L1)exp=0.0042 {I8}, |a(L2)exp=0.0034 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0041 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.0008 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0013 {I4} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.045, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.011, |a(L3)exp=0.003, |a(M)exp=0.002 and |a(N)exp=0.0006 (1971Ma45); |a(K)exp=0.049 {I5} and |a(L)exp=0.012 {I2} (2012De24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.18 {I19}, |a(L1)exp=0.16 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.018 {I3}, |a(M1)exp=0.024 {I4} and |a(M2)exp=0.0053 {I12} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.74, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.128, |a(L3)exp=0.0087, |a(M)exp=0.0032 and |a(N)exp=0.0012 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |a(K)exp=1.18 {I19}, |a(L1)exp=0.16 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.018 {I3}, |a(M1)exp=0.024 {I4} and |a(M1)exp=0.0053 {I12} (1996Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.048 {I12}, |a(L1)exp=0.010 {I3}, and |a(L3)exp=0.0054 {I22} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.073, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.019, and |a(M)exp=0.004 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.070 {I23}, |a(L1)exp=0.009 {I3}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0018 {I6} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.063, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.009, |a(M)exp=0.0002 and |a(N)exp=0.00009 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |a(K)exp=0.070 {I23}, |a(L1)exp=0.009 {I3}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0018 {I5} (1996Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=6.7 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=1.2 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.25 {I8}, and |a(M2)exp=0.030 {I14} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(L1)exp=0.41, |a(M)exp=0.23 and |a(N)exp=0.12 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.0 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.39 {I15}, |a(L2)exp=0.7 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.8 {I3}, and |a(M3)exp=0.15 {I6} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.96, |a(L1)exp=0.1, |a(L2)exp=0.75, |a(L3)exp=0.67, |a(M)exp=0.42 and |a(N)exp=0.13 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) (1974Kr12); |a(K)exp=0.37 {i6} (2012De24); |a(K)exp=0.50 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.037 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.012 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.010 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.010 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.53 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.10 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.41 {I+19-11} (1974Kr12) and |a(K)exp=0.37 {I6} (2012De24). The sign is from 1974Kr12. Others (not used in the analysis): |a(K)exp=0.50 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.037 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.012 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.010 {I3} and |a(M2)exp=0.0095 {I50} (1996Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.034 {i4} (2012De24); |a(K)exp=0.028 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0024 {I8}, and |a(L3)exp=0.0018 {I6} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.024, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.005, |a(L3)exp=0.0013, |a(M)exp=0.0013 and |a(N)exp=0.0027 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.66 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.065 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.0041 {I32}, and |a(M1)exp=0.016 {I3} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.51, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.082, |a(L3)exp=0.0087, and |a(M)exp=0.0052 (1971Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I5}, |a(L1)exp=0.0036 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.0030 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0024 {I9} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.047, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0069, and |a(M)exp=0.0019 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.6 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.38 {I15}, |a(L2)exp=0.18 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.25 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.08 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.017 {I7} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=1.6, |a(L1)exp=0.24, |a(L2)exp=0.027, |a(M)exp=0.11 and |a(N)exp=0.028 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |a(K)exp=2.6 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.038 {I15}, |a(M1)exp=0.08 {I3} and |a(M2)exp=0.017 {I7} (1996Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.2 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.043 {I12}, |a(L3)exp=0.034 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.066 {I16} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=1.2 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.19 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.1 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.032 {I9}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.66, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.12, |a(L3)exp=0.015, |a(M)exp=0.045 and |a(N)exp=0.0097 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(L2)exp=35 {I8} and |a(L3)exp=38 {I8} (1996Pe05); |a(L2)exp=35.12, |a(L3)exp=39.05, |a(M)exp=32.14 and |a(N)exp=16.7 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.3 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.018 {I6}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0038 {I9} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.95, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.26, |a(L3)exp=0.03, |a(M)exp=0.07 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L2)exp=0.018 {I7} and |a(L3)exp=0.008 {I3} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.076 and |a(M)exp=0.0031 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.031 {I7}, and |a(L2)exp=0.0067 {I19} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.46 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.07 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0391 {I17} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.022 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.006 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1974Kr12; |a(K)exp=0.30 {i2} (2012De24); |a(L1)exp=0.078 {I23} and |a(M1)exp=0.023 {I7} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.56 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.048 (1971Ma45). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.52 {I5} (1974Kr12) and |a(K)exp=0.30 {I2} (2012De24). The sign is from 1974Kr12. Others (not used in the analysis): |a(L1)exp=0.078 {I24} and |a(M1)exp=0.023 {I7} (1996Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.026 {i2} and |a(L)exp=0.0063 {i6} (2012De24); |a(K)exp=0.028 {I8} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.025, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.006, and |a(M)exp=0.0015 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.84 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.051 {I14}, |a(L2)exp=0.23 {I6}, |a(M2)exp=0.050 {I13}, and |a(M3)exp=0.036 {I9} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.75, |a(L1)exp=0.06, |a(L2)exp=0.11, |a(L3)exp=0.021, and |a(M)exp=0.09 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=32.9 {I20} from |g-ray transition intensity balance (1981Hn03); |a(L2)exp=11.2 {I3} and ce(L2)/ce(L3)exp=1.24 {I3} (1990Bu31); ce(K)/ce(L)/ce(M)exp=31.6 {I16}/323 {I11}/91 {I7} (2012De24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0650 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.0070 {I13}, |a(L2)exp=0.0113 {I18}, |a(M1)exp=0.0016 {I7}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0028 {I8} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.09, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.027, and |a(M)exp=0.004 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.8427 {I13}, |a(L1)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L2)exp=0.024 {I5}, and |a(M1)exp=0.022 {I5} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.74, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.16, and |a(M)exp=0.05 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.051 {I11}, |a(L1)exp=0.0067 {I21}, and |a(L2)exp=0.0053 {I20} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.067 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.19 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.021 {I6}, and |a(L2)exp=0.027 {I13} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.37 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.076 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.017 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.009 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.007 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0042 {I20} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.08 and |a(M)exp=0.006 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.52 {I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.068 {I15}, and |a(L2)exp=0.028 {I7} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.38 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.059 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.076 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.017 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.009 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.007 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.004 {I2} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.08 and |a(M)exp=0.006 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+177}Yb |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp>0.0009 (1964Jo03); |a(K)exp (1964Ew04); |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I1} (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.16 {I4} and |a(L1)exp=0.013 {I4} (1996Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.16 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.018 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$121.6 {i1} (1995Ya21) 
RI$Weighted average of 59 {i4} (1995Ya21) and 62 {i6} (1970Br38) 
M$Others: (K/L1)exp=3.6 {i3}, (K/L2)exp=7.2 {i6} and (K/L3)exp=10.8 {i12} (1972Ag05); (K/L)exp=4.5 {i6} and ((L1+L2))/L3)exp=4.5 {i6} (1964Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$150.3 {i1} (1995Ya21) 
RI$Weighted average of 347 {i24} (1995Ya21) and 364 {i30} (1970Br38) 
M$Others: |a(K)exp=0.383 {I30}; |a(L1)exp=0.088 {I8}; |a(L2)exp=0.036 {I5}; |a(L3)exp=0.0046 {I12} (1972Ag05); L1/L3=27 {i7}, L2/L3=10 {i3} (1966He01); anomalous E1 transition 
CC$Experimental value of |a{-tot}=0.512 {i32} (1972Ag05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$147.3 {i1} (1995Ya21) 
RI$Weighted average of 3.1 {i7} (1995Ya21) and 3.3 {i10} (1970Br38) 
M$Others: |a(K)exp=1.22 {I54} (1972Ag05); |d(|g|g(|q))=0.58 {I+13-15} (1995Ya21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$138.6 {i1} (1995Ya21) 
RI$Weighted average of 24 {i2} (1995Ya21) and 24.2 {i24} (1970Br38) 
M$Others: |a(K)exp=1.17 {I16}, |a(L1)exp=0.20 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.028 {I8}, and |a(L3)exp=0.014 {I7} (1972Ag05); (K/L)exp=5 {i1} (1964Jo03); |d(|g|g(|q))=0.18 {i4} (1995Ya21) and +0.28 {i6} (1973Il02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$171.5 {i4} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(171|g)/I|g(319|g)=0.457 {i7} in adopted gammas and I|g(319|g)=0.08 {i4} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$300.5 {i5} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(300|g)/I|g(162|g)=0.116 {i17} in adopted gammas and I|g(162|g)=1.1 {i1} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$336.6 {i3} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(336.3|g)/I|g(457.96|g)=0.0193 {i27} in adopted gammas and I|g(456.96|g)=0.73 {i3} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(283.33|g)/I|g(94.14|g)=0.0022 {i22} in adopted gammas and I|g(94.14|g)=0.08 {i2} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(401.721|g)/I|g(94.14|g)=0.019 {i5} in adopted gammas and I|g(94.14|g)=0.08 {i2} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$430.5 {i3} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(430.473|g)/I|g(94.14|g)=0.061 {i12} in adopted gammas and I|g(94.14|g)=0.08 {i2} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$552.0 {i1} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(94.14|g)=0.74 {i11} in adopted gammas and I|g(94.14|g)=0.08 {i2} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$214.2 {i3} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(119.845|g)=0.125 {i20} in adopted gammas and I|g(119.845|g)=0.08 {i5} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(119.845|g)=0.0057 {i19} in adopted gammas and I|g(119.845|g)=0.08 {i5} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(119.845|g)=0.010 {i4} in adopted gammas and I|g(119.845|g)=0.08 {i5} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(119.845|g)=0.020 {i4} in adopted gammas and I|g(119.845|g)=0.08 {i5} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$549.9 {i4} (1995Ya21) 
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(119.845|g)=0.48 {i7} in adopted gammas and I|g(119.845|g)=0.08 {i5} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(552.102|g)/I|g(119.845|g)=0.164 {i25} in adopted gammas and I|g(119.845|g)=0.08 {i5} from 1995Ya21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 11.1 {i4} (1995Ya21) and 11.5 {i8} (1970Br38) 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1995Ya21 and |a(K)exp (1964Ew04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.2 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.31 {I11}, |a(L2)exp=0.16 {I6}, |a(L3)exp=0.11 {I4}, |a(M2)exp=0.041 {I15} and |a(M3)exp=0.024 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=1.43, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.31, |a(L3)exp=0.086, |a(M)exp=0.11 and |a(N)exp=0.026 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$An anomalous E1 transition. See 1972Ag05 for details. |a(K)exp=0.61 {I12}, |a(L1)exp=0.122 {I23}, |a(L2)exp=0.047 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.028 {I5}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.32, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.09, |a(L3)exp=0.004, |a(M)exp=0.0029 and |a(N)exp=0.0011 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.1 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.032 {I9}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.66, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.12, |a(L3)exp=0.015, |a(M)exp=0.045 and |a(N)exp=0.0097 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 147|g depopulating the 720.81 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0686 {I11}, |a(L1)exp=0.0070 {I12}, |a(L2)exp=0.0135 {I23}, |a(L3)exp=0.0151 {I26}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0032 {I6} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.09, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.02, |a(L3)exp=0.006, |a(M)exp=0.0049 and |a(N)exp=0.0011 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.6 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.22 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.029 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0097 {I23}, and |a(M1)exp=0.048 {I12} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=1.12, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.19, |a(L3)exp=0.016, |a(M)exp=0.06 and |a(N)exp=0.025 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.74 {I12}, |a(L1)exp=0.055 {I18}, |a(L2)exp=0.073 {I20}, |a(L3)exp=0.017 {I6}, and |a(M1)exp=0.013 {I3} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.55, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.10, |a(L3)exp=0.02, and |a(M)exp=0.0037 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.038 {I7}, |a(L1)exp=0.0042 {I8}, |a(L2)exp=0.0034 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0041 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.0008 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0013 {I4} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.045, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.011, |a(L3)exp=0.003, |a(M)exp=0.002 and |a(N)exp=0.0006 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.18 {I19}, |a(L1)exp=0.16 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.018 {I3}, |a(M1)exp=0.024 {I4} and |a(M2)exp=0.0053 {I12} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.74, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.128, |a(L3)exp=0.0087, |a(M)exp=0.0032 and |a(N)exp=0.0012 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.048 {I12}, |a(L1)exp=0.010 {I3}, and |a(L3)exp=0.0054 {I22} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.073, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.019, and |a(M)exp=0.004 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.032 {I11} and |a(L2)exp=0.006 {I4} (1996Pe05). Note, that values overlap with these for the 336.33|g depopulating the state at 1488.7 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.070 {I23}, |a(L1)exp=0.009 {I3}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0018 {I6} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.063, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.009, |a(M)exp=0.0002 and |a(N)exp=0.00009 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} and |a(L1)exp=0.0022 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.028 {I5} (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with these for the 552.1|g depopulating the 1728.4 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.50 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.037 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.012 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.010 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.010 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.53 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.10 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.028 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0024 {I8}, and |a(L3)exp=0.0018 {I6} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.024, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.005, |a(L3)exp=0.0013, |a(M)exp=0.0013 and |a(N)exp=0.0027 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with these for the 367.440|g depopulating the state at 1544.277 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.66 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.065 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.0041 {I32}, and |a(M1)exp=0.016 {I3} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.51, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.082, |a(L3)exp=0.0087, and |a(M)exp=0.0052 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I5}, |a(L1)exp=0.0036 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.0030 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0024 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.047, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0069, and |a(M)exp=0.0019 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.6 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.38 {I15}, |a(L2)exp=0.18 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.25 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.08 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.017 {I7} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=1.6, |a(L1)exp=0.24, |a(L2)exp=0.027, |a(M)exp=0.11 and |a(N)exp=0.028 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.016 {I5} and |a(L1)exp=0.0033 {I13} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.021 {I5} (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.2 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.043 {I12}, |a(L3)exp=0.034 {I10}, and |a(M1)exp=0.066 {I16} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=1.2 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.19 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.1 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0051 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.032 {I9}, |a(M2)exp=0.014 {I3} and |a(M3)exp=0.0014 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.66, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.12, |a(L3)exp=0.015, |a(M)exp=0.045 and |a(N)exp=0.0097 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 147|g depopulating the 268.801 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L2)exp=35 {I8} and |a(L3)exp=38 {I8} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(L2)exp=35.12, |a(L3)exp=39.05, |a(M)exp=32.14 and |a(N)exp=16.7 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.3 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.018 {I6}, and |a(M1)exp=0.0038 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.95, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.26, |a(L3)exp=0.03, |a(M)exp=0.07 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L2)exp=0.018 {I7} and |a(L3)exp=0.008 {I3} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.076 and |a(M)exp=0.0031 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} and |a(L1)exp=0.0041 {I18} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.029 {I7} (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0044 {I18} and |a(L1)exp=0.0020 {I11} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.016 {I1} (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I6} (1971Ma45). Value overlaps with that for the 822.5|g depopulating the 1676.9 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.031 {I7}, and |a(L2)exp=0.0067 {I19} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.46 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.07 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0391 {I17} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.022 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.006 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp=0.078 {I23} and |a(M1)exp=0.023 {I7} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.56 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.048 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.028 {I8} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.025, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.006, and |a(M)exp=0.0015 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.84 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.051 {I14}, |a(L2)exp=0.23 {I6}, |a(M2)exp=0.050 {I13}, and |a(M3)exp=0.036 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.75, |a(L1)exp=0.06, |a(L2)exp=0.11, |a(L3)exp=0.021, and |a(M)exp=0.09 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with these for the 145.874|g depopulating the 957.327 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.84 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.051 {I14}, |a(L2)exp=0.23 {I6}, |a(M2)exp=0.050 {I13}, and |a(M3)exp=0.036 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.75, |a(L1)exp=0.06, |a(L2)exp=0.11, |a(L3)exp=0.021, and |a(M)exp=0.09 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlaps with these for the 145.87|g depopulating the 907.7 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0650 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=0.0070 {I13}, |a(L2)exp=0.0113 {I18}, |a(M1)exp=0.0016 {I7}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0028 {I8} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.09, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.027, and |a(M)exp=0.004 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.8427 {I13}, |a(L1)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L2)exp=0.024 {I5}, and |a(M1)exp=0.022 {I5} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.74, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.16, and |a(M)exp=0.05 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.051 {I11}, |a(L1)exp=0.0067 {I21}, and |a(L2)exp=0.0053 {I20} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.067 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.19 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.021 {I6}, and |a(L2)exp=0.027 {I13} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.37 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.076 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.017 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.009 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.007 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.0042 {I20} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.08 and |a(M)exp=0.006 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with that for the 244.332|g depopulating the 1201.649 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0092 {I15} (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1030.021|g depopulating the 1470.992 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.52 {I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.068 {I15}, and |a(L2)exp=0.028 {I7} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.38 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.059 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.076 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.017 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.009 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.007 {I3}, and |a(M2)exp=0.004 {I2} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.08 and |a(M)exp=0.006 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with these for the 244.31|g depopulating the 1151.6 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.16 {I4} and |a(L1)exp=0.013 {I4} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.16 and |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.018 (1971Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0084 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1184.6|g depopulating the 1820.8 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1305.3|g depopulating the 1573.9 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.011 {I6} (1971Ma45). Note, that value overlaps with that for the 753.27|g depopulating the 1607.4 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0092 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1030.0|g depopulating the 1151.6 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0077 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1202.6|g depopulating the 1472.1 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.032 {I11} and |a(L2)exp=0.006 {I4} (1996Pe05). Note, that values overlap with that for the 336.335|g depopulating the state at 457.964 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1220.632|g depopulating the 1661.471 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1065.7|g depopulating the 1881.9 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Value overlaps with that for the 1236.7|g depopulating the 1873.7 keV and 1676.9 keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI,M$|a(K)exp=0.028 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0024 {I8}, and |a(L3)exp=0.0018 {I6} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.024, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.005, |a(L3)exp=0.0013, |a(M)exp=0.0013 and |a(N)exp=0.0027 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with these for the 367.440|g depopulating the state at 636.242 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1305.706|g depopulating the 1305.706 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.011 (1971Ma45). Note, that value overlaps with that for the 753.447|g depopulating the 1389.671 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1220.3|g depopulating the 1488.7 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 (1971Ma45). Value overlaps with that for the 822.5|g depopulating the 822.5 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Value overlaps with that for the 1236.7|g depopulating the 1873.7 keV and 1505.9 keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I3} (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1056.79|g depopulating the 1728.4 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} and |a(L1)exp=0.0022 {I9} (1996Pe05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.028 (1971Ma45). Note, that values overlap with these for the 552.102|g depopulating the 552.104 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0036 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1056.3|g depopulating the 1692.4 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0084 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1184.142|g depopulating the 1305.706 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1971Ma45). Value overlaps with that for the 1236.7|g depopulating the 1676.9 keV and 1505.9 keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023 (1971Ma45). Note, that the value overlaps with that for the 1065.7|g depopulating the 1505.9 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 52 {I4} (1967Ha09), 48.7 {I29} (1972Ch48), 48.3 {I14} (1981Hn03), 47.9 {I14} (2012Ko23), 52.5 {I9} (2012De24), and 48.2 {I8} (2014La20). Other: 62 {I3} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 27 {I3} (1964Al04), 29 {I2} (1967Ha09), 30.2 {I23} (1972Ch48), 28.4 {I14} (1981Hn03), 29.4 {I14} (2012De24), and 28.1 {I4} (2014La20). Other: 27.8 {I8} (2012Ko23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 28.3 {I15} (1972Ch48), 28.2 {I11} (1981Hn03), 27.1 {I7} (2012De24), and 27.4 {I7} (2014La20). Others: 32 {I5} (1964Al04), 25 {I3} (1967Ha09) and 24.8 {I8} (2012Ko23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 41 {I4} (1964Al04), 37 {I4} (1967Ha09), 41.0 {I22} (1972Ch48), 39.0 {I12} (1981Hn03), 38.0 {I6} (2012De24), 35.3 {I11} (2012Ko23) and 38.1 {I6} (2014La20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 86 {I4} (1964Al04), 78 {I8} (1967Ha09), 85.7 {I47} (1972Ch48), 85.6 {I25} (1981Hn03), 83.3 {I14} (2012De24), 78.1 {I23} (2012Ko23) and 83.1 {I23} (2014La20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 7.0 {I6} (1967Ha09), 7.2 {I7} (1972Ch48), 6.9 {I3} (1981Hn03), 7.4 {I3} (2012Ko23), and 6.60 {I12} (2014La20). Others: 9 {I2} (1964Al04) and 5.80 {I18} (2012De24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 25 {I5} (1964Al04), 23 {I2} (1967Ha09), 24.8 {I16} (1972Ch48), 26.1 {I7} (1981Hn03), 24.0 {I5} (2012De24), 24.3 {I8} (2012Ko23) and 25.1 {I6} (2014La20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 27 {I3} (1967Ha09), 25.1 {I30} (1972Ch48), 27.0 {I10} (1981Hn03), 26.2 {I9} (2012Ko23), 26.5 {I5} (2012De24), and 26.8 {I5} (2014La20). Other: 37 {I6} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 131 {I10} (1967Ha09), 137.5 {I70} (1972Ch48), 143 {I3} (1981Hn03), 129 {I4} (2012Ko23), 140.6 {I22} (2012De24), and 138.8 {I21} (2014La20). Other: 163 {I16} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 5.0 {I4} (1967Ha09), 5.0 {I5} (1972Ch48), 5.5 {I3} (1981Hn03), 5.39 {I18} (2012Ko23), 4.96 {I23} (2012De24), and 5.12 {I14} (2014La20). Other: 9 {I2} (1964Al04) 
CC$|a(exp)=33.5 from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
%I|g=75.3 {I8} assuming adopted normalization. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.17 {I5} and |a(L)exp/|a(K)exp=0.23 {I2} (1993Bo14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1987Ru04 only. Not observed by 1995Me03 who propose line as originating from summing effects. 
E$not included in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$42~{I28} from 1989Mc07 and based on systematics. 
BE2W$Uncertainty is only from T{-1/2} value. 
$BE2W=0.051 +42-15 
BE2W$The calculated B(E2)(W.u.) is almost independent of E|g over the allowed range. Uncertainty is from T{-1/2} value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From the systematics of the energy separation of the 8+ and 10+ states in the lighter-mass doubly even N=82 nuclides, 1989Mc07 estimate that the energy of the unobserved 10+ |) 8+ transition lies between 14 and 70~keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved transition proposed by 2024Al20 to account for the observation of the 141|g and 185|g in coincidence with the 45|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R{-ang}=1.6 {I4} 
$Placement is that shown on the level scheme of 2005Se11. In their table of |g-ray properties, they show it as a 12+|)10+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R{-ang}=1.4 {I3} 
$Placement is that shown on the level scheme of 2005Se11. In their table of |g-ray properties, they show it as a 10+|)8+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I10} 
M$Stretched dipole, from A{-2}. Intensity balance gives preference for M1 over E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$sum of I|g values for the 600.6 and 601.5 |g's 
$DCO(60|',180|')=1.31 {I20}, DCO(38|',90|')=0.79 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI sum of I|g values for the 600.6 and 601.5 |g's 
$DCO(60|',180|')=1.14 {I21}, DCO(38|',90|')=0.60 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$549.8 {I5} in {+126}Te({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
$|g(|q)for 549.9+549.4 consistent with stretched quadrupole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$R=0.68 {I13} 
E,RI$multiple line (1988Hu05). 
M$the angular-correlation ratio suggests a dipole transition, but the placement requires |DJ=2, quadrupole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$R=0.77 {I18} 
M$the angular-correlation ratio suggests a dipole transition, but the placement requires |DJ=2, quadrupole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from |g|g projection spectrum 
M$DCO suggests |DJ=1, dipole; but in {+94}Zr({+74}Ge,5n|g) (2014Ya30), DCO is consistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 376.8 {I1} (1983Sc18) 
RI$average of 22.0 {I20} (from I(|g+ce)=23.0 {I20} (1989Hi04)) and 18.6 {I21} (1992Ha10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q). |d=4.2 {I+22-12} is also allowed by |g|g(|q) but less likely from |d=0.34 {I3} calculated from branching ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q). |d=4.5 {I+|@-14} is also allowed by |g|g(|q) but less likely from |d=0.37 {I2} calculated from branching ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$other: 141.8 {I6} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 89 {I26} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 54 {I11} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 223.1 {I10} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 222.3 {I5} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: <31 from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 406.6 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 406.1 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I15} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 529.2 {I6} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 529.6 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I31} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$other: 751.6 {I6} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 81 {I24} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 46 {I10} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 405.3 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 405.1 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 27 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 25 {I5} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 437.3 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 437.1 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 334.6 {I10} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 14 {I5} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 7.9 {I16} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 842.7 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 842.5 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I15} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$other: 356.7 {I6} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 65 {I19} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 109 {I21} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 404.2 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 404.4 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I15} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+22}Ne,5n|g). Other: 645.5 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 61 {I9} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 69 {I7} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$other: 446.1 {I10} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average 97 {I30} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 125 {I25} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.7 {I6} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 934 {I1} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I30} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 416.6 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 416.3 {I3} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 84 {I12} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) and 97 {I18} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 501.4 {I4} from ({+40}Ca,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+40}Ca,5n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from ({+22}Ne,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement based on the work of 1993Ne01, placed from (51/2-) to 47/2- in 1987Bl06 in the same band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=16.1 {I11} in 1977Le08. 
M 651|g-159|g(|q) consistent with 2+(810)-2+(159)-0+(g.s.) sequence (W(|D|q=75|')/W(|D|q=15|')=0.99 {I12}) (2005Mc01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=536.0 {I4}, I|g=7.5 {I10} in 1977Le08; probably included large contribution from 537.6|g in {+166}Yb (2005Mc01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI 11.5 {I15} in 1977Le08. 
M from 906|g-159|g(|q) consistent with 0(1065)-2+(159)-0+(g.s.) sequence (W(|D|q=75|')/W(|D|q=15|')=0.50 {I10}) (2005Mc01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from table I of 2005Mc01; E|g=1133.75 {I11} in table II and 1134 in fig. 3. {I1132}.75 fits placement well, 1133.75 does not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.47 {I17} (|DJ=1, D gate); DCO=1.01 {I22} (|DJ=2 gate). Interpreted by authors as D, |DJ=0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 158.5 3 (1987Bl06); 158.7 3 (1983Ag01); 158.7 5 (1965St03). 
A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.12 {I5} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.52 {I1} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 311.8 3 (1987Bl06); 312.0 3 (1983Ag01); 311.0 9 (1965St03). 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.81 {I2} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 426.6 3 (1987Bl06); 426.7 3 (1983Ag01); 426.9 13 (1965St03). 
A{-2}=+0.34 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.98 {I2} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 509.5 3 (1987Bl06); 509.6 3 (1983Ag01); 509.5 15 (1965St03). 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.03 {I2} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E 829.6 3 (1983Ag01); 829.3 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=-0.29 {I8}; A{-4}=-0.07 {I9} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.65 {I19} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 565.5 3 (1987Bl06); 565.8 3 (1983Ag01); 564.0 17 (1965St03) 
A{-2}=+0.35; A{-4}=-0.07 (1983Ag01). DCO=1.04 {I3} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 352.5 3 (1983Ag01); 352.2 3 (1987Bl06). 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I7}; A{-4}=-0.15 {I8} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.08 {I14} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E 672.8 3 (1983Ag01); 672.2 3 (1987Bl06). 
A{-2}=-0.25 {I5}; A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.80 {I10} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 418.1 3 (1987Bl06); 418.5 3 (1983Ag01). 
A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}; A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.01 {I4} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E 525.2 3 (1983Ag01); 524.7 3 (1987Bl06). 
A{-2}=-0.25 {I7}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I9} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.68 {I8} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 594.0 3 (1987Bl06); 594.4 3 (1983Ag01); 593.8 18 (1965St03) 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.02 {I4} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 763.1 3 (1983Ag01); 762.7 3 (1987Bl06). 
A{-2}=+0.45 {I10}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I12} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.06 {I15} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 465.8 3 (1983Ag01); 465.4 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.09 {I4} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 274.8 3 (1983Ag01); 274.6 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I7}; A{-4}=-0.11 {I8} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.9060 (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 443.6 3 (1983Ag01); 443.4 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.01 {I2} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 440.1 3 (1983Ag01); 439.8 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.27 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.07 {I3} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 512.2 3 (1983Ag01); 510.4 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1983Ag01). DCO=0.97 {I3} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 560.4 3 (1983Ag01); 560.2 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.16 {I8} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.11 {I2} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 557.8 3 (1983Ag01); 557.5 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.07 {I6} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 628.4 3 (1983Ag01); 628.1 3 (1987Bl06). 
A{-2}=+0.27 {I8}; A{-4}=0.00 {I9} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.03 {I5} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E 739.1 3 (1983Ag01); 738.9 3 (1987Bl06) 
A{-2}=+0.16 {I10}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I13} (1983Ag01). DCO=1.12 {I5} (1987Bl06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 25.2 {I9} in ({+26}Mg,5n|g), and 17.0 {I6} in ({+16}O,4n|g). 
E$level-energy difference=680.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=170 {I7} in ({+26}Mg,5n|g) is discrepant, as this intensity could be for sum of the two |g rays: 775.0 and 775.7, the latter reported only in ({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$consistent with that for known transition deexciting first excited state of {+167}Hf; tentatively placed by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$shown as tentative because |g may be doublet in 1999Sm13. E|g is somewhat lower than expected for this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unrealistic low uncertainty of 0.1 in 1999Cr01 appears to be a misprint. Evaluators assign uncertainty of 1.0 
M$E2 in 1999Cr01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level scheme Fig. 1, absent in Table II of 1999Cr01. Observed and tentatively placed by 1999Sm13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)/I(|g+ce)(205|g)=0.03 in ({+14}N,6n|g) at 95 MeV (1983Ar09); includes contaminant. 
$Other E|g=750.2 {I7} (1983Ar09), contaminated |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Other I|g: <25 from (HI,xn|g). 
M D |DJ=0 or Q |DJ=2 from DCO in ({+76}Ge,4n|g); (E1) from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 20.6 {I16} (1989Hi04). 
M (752|g)(124|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.004 {I32}, A{-4}=+0.29 {I4} (2007Mc08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR (645|g)(262|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I4} (2007Mc08) |d>+10 or <-20 from |g|g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 14.0 {I19} (1989Hi04). 
E DE=9.5 quoted in table 3 of 1989Hi04 seems to be a misprint; most likely it is 0.95 KEV. Other: EG=907.2 10 (1976Le14) 
M (907|g)(124|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3} (2007Mc08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 4.7 13 (1989Hi04). 
M (935|g)(124|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.27 {I7} (2007Mc08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1983Ar09); A{-2}=+0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1972Li34). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1983Ar09); A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1972Li34). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1983Ar09); A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1972Li34). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} (1983Ar09); A{-2}=+0.34 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} (1972Li34). Not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1983Ar09) for 522.0 doublet; A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (1972Li34). Q from 1981Ja11; not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1983Ar09). Not M2 from RUL. 
$A2=+0.30 2, A4=+0.05 3 (1972Li34) FOR G CONTAMINATED BY 569.7G FROM 207PB. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1983Ar09). Not M2 from RUL. Other: A{-2}=+0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (1972Li34) for line contaminated by 12+ to 10+ transition in {+170}Hf. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=159.9 {I20}. Per email reply from first author to XUNDL compiler on April 5, 2016, the 1.4% implied uncertainty in theoretical conversion coefficients from the BrIcc code was not included in their B(E2) uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR -4.0|<|d|<-0.05 from |g(|q) in ({+14}N.4n|g). 0.35 {I10} based on branching and rotational model if K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR -6.0|<|d|<-0.03 from |g(|q) in ({+14}N,4n|g). 0.22 {I7} based on branching and rotational model if K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR -10|<|d|<+0.02 from |g(|q) in ({+14}N,4n|g). 0.18 {I5} based on branching and rotational model if K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E note that, in {+130}Te({+44}Ca,5n|g), E|g=1004.8 {I2} was proposed for this 67/2 to 63/2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M appreciable E1 component deduced from upper limit for total {+169}Ta decays (|<3430), relative to I|g(28.8|g) (limit determined from x-ray and |g{+|+} intensities). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M see comment with 28.8|g; authors state preference for E1 assignment (M1 also possible), on basis of similar, but less conclusive, argument. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Not observed (masked by 2+ to 0+ |g ray in {+170}Hf). E|g from Adopted Gammas, I|g from I(177|g) and adopted branching for 177 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g=29 {I3} for both placements of 99.6|g and I|g=3.4 for placement from 177.2 level (based on adopted branching). 
M,MR A{-2}=-0.19 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I16} for doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from adopted I|g(99.6|g)/I|g(177.1|g)=0.078 {I11} and I|g(177.1|g)=44.0. I|g=29 {I3} for 99.6|g doublet. 
1975Re05 deduce |d(D,Q)=0.70 {I21} from branching ratio and and rotational model assuming K=5/2, but it is unclear how, or if, they divided I(99.6|g) between its two placements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.40 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I13}. 
MR -4.0|<|d|<-0.05 from |g(|q). 0.35 {I10} based on branching. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.47 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I21}. 
MR -6.0|<|d|<-0.03 from |g(|q). 0.22 {I7} based on branching. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.32 {I11}, A{-4}=0.00 {I17}. 
MR -10|<|d|<+0.02 from |g(|q). 0.18 {I5} based on branching. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M angular distribution ratio is consistent with pure stretched D; probably E1 because M1 transition of such high energy would be expected to show E2 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 100.8 {I2} (1976Le04). 
RI from 1976Le04. 
%I|g=20.70 {I24} assuming adopted decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.9 {I3}. 
M |a(exp)=10.7 {I16} from intensity balance at 101 level rules out E1 and M2 or higher. Band structure favors E2 over M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
Coin with 320.8|g (6+ to 4+, g.s. band). |g(|q) isotropic; |a(K)exp consistent with mult=M1 (1981Li15). Placement from 1979Dr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E value given as 879.1 in 1989IrZZ and 1999Li42 clearly contains a typographical error; level energy difference is 897.1. 
A 786|g, tentatively placed from 28+ band member by 1981Li15, was not confirmed by 1989IrZZ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. 
M |DJ=3 transition; see comment in {+171}Hf IT decay data set. |D|p=(yes) from orbital assignments based on measured |m for g.s. and 22 level. 
B(E3)(W.u.): assuming %IT=100 for 22 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 98.80 {I15} from (HI,xn|g), 98.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g). 
RI from (HI,xn|g); however, see comment on I(183|g) from 245 level. 
M from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from (HI,xn|g). 
E$others: 183.2 {I3} from (HI,xn|g), 183.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g). 
RI$62 |< I|g |< 110 from (HI,xn|g); however, I|g=800 for E=183.6 {I1} transition in ({+18}O,7n|g) and 135 {I6} in ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 153.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,7n|g), 152.4 {I1} from |e decay. 
RI$unweighted average of 90 {I10} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 7.5 {I30} from ({+18}O,7n|g), and 30.2 {I31} from |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 116.3 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 116.81 {I15} from (HI,xn|g), 117.1 {I1} from |e decay, 116.3 {I4} from ({+18}O,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from |e decay; others: 75 {I25} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), |? 74 from (HI,xn|g). 
E$others: 209.0 {I5} from (HI,xn|g), 209.2 {I1} from |e decay, 208.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 59 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) and 53 {I7} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g); other: 0.9 {I3} from ({+18}O,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 139.6 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 139.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,7n|g), 140.1 {I2} from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from |e decay; others: 253.3 {I2} from (HI,xn|g), 253.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g), 252.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 129.4 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g), 129.8 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) 
RI from (HI,xn|g); other: 22 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from (HI,xn|g). 
E$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g); other: 204.2 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g). 
RI$from ({+18}O,7n|g); others: 25.5 {I15} in (HI,xn|g), 40 {I5} in ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 180.9 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) and 180.1 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 
RI$others: 43 {I15} from (HI,xn|g) and 86 {I57} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 
M from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 151.7 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g), 149.7 {I2} from (HI,xn|g). 
RI 17.3 {I7} in ({+18}O,7n|g), 7.7 {I7} in (HI,xn|g), 34 {I4} in ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 
M from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 25.3 {I17} in ({+18}O,7n|g), 16.8 {I26} in (HI,xn|g), and 19.2 {I19} in ({+48}Ca,5n|g) (weighted average is 21.5 {I25}). 
M from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 160.5 {I3} in (HI,xn|g), 159.9 {I1} in ({+18}O,7n|g). 
RI$other: 8.9 {I5} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 225.6 {I4} in (HI,xn|g), 224.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 
RI$from (HI,xn|g) where I|g(225|g):I|g(438|g)=25 {I9}: |? 100; other: 50 from ({+18}O,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 354.5 {I3} from ({+18}O,7n|g), 355.1 from (HI,xn|g). 
RI$other: 17.8 {I16} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from (HI,xn|g). 
E$others: 498.5 {I3}, placed in signature partner band in (HI,xn|g); 497.3 {I2} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 498.0 {I4} in (HI,xn|g) where |g was given alternate placement, 498.0 {I4} in ({+18}O,7n|g) 
RI$others: 6.3 {I23} in (HI,xn|g) and 6.3 {I23} in ({+18}O,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 507.7 {I4} in (HI,xn|g), 506.1 {I1} in ({+18}O,7n|g) 
M Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q intraband |g from (HI,xn|g); M2 excluded by comparison to RUL 
E$others: 658.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,7n|g), 659.4 {I3} from (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 666.6 {I3} in (HI,xn|g), 665.3 {I1} from ({+18}O,7n|g) 
M$Q |g from DCO in ({+18}O,7n|g); M2 excluded by comparison to RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 715.0 {I5} in (HI,xn|g), 714.1 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g) 
M Q intraband |g from {+128}Te({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at E=209 MeV. Other: 641.4 from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at 200 MeV. 
RI from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at 200 MeV. Other: 49 {I23} from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at 209 MeV. 
M Q intraband |g from {+128}Te({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at E=209 MeV. Other: 349.0 {I6} in (HI,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at 200 MeV. Other: 100 {I29} from 209 MeV data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at E=209 MeV 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at 200 MeV, Other: 67 {I29} from 209 MeV data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,5n|g) at 200 MeV. E|g=361 in figure 1 of 2000Cu01 does not fit placement and is presumed to be a misprint of 351. E|g=350 (1997Cu01 and 2012Zh22) in ({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M stretched D from DCO; |DJ=0 with large E2 admixture is also consistent with DCO but not likely from decay pattern. |D|p from decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$DCO for 362|g+362|g doublet consistent with D, |DJ=1. 
E$other: 359.7 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g) for |g possibly deexciting J=51/2 member of same band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M stretched D from DCO; |DJ=0 with large E2 admixture is also consistent with DCO but not likely based on decay pattern. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 845.0 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g) for |g with different placement; however, see comment on 843.9|g from 7183 level. 
M Q intraband |g in ({+48}Ca,5n|g); not M2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M (Q) intraband |g from {+128}Te({+48}Ca,5n|g). 
E$other: 845.0 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g), for |g placed out-of-band to J=45/2 member of gs band rather than in-band; possibly a doublet comprised of this transition and the out-of-band 846.7|g observed in ({+48}Ca,5n|g) but absent in ({+18}O,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1076.0 {I2} in ({+18}O,7n|g), 1085 in (HI,xn|g). 
M (Q) intraband |g from {+128}Te({+48}Ca,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference in Adopted Levels. 
M if %IT(22 level) exceeds about 0.1%, RUL requires |DJ|<3 for this transition; even if it were |?100%, the reduced transition probability would be unreasonably small if |DJ<3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. E|g=22.2 in 1974La24. 
TI 131 {I17} from intensity balance at 22 level, assuming no |e+|b{++} branch to this level (|DJ=(2), |D|p=(yes) transition) and %IT=100 from 22 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR from intensity balance at 61.9 level (assuming no |e+|b{++} feeding of level; log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5 for %|e+|b{++}<5). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Unobserved transition; existence (I(|g+ce)|>14 {I6}) suggested by intensity balance at 103 level. E|g from level energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g=14.7 {I15} for three placements and I|g=1.5 {I2} for 1001.3-level placement. I|g|>4.6 {I16} is obtained for 492.6-level placement based on intensity balance at the 493 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from intensity balance at (11/2-) 508.7 level (to which no significant |e+|b{++} feeding is expected because |DJ=3). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g=33 {I3} for both placements and I|g|<11.6 for 1977, 2-level placement. 
A{-2}=+0.31 {I11} (1972Re13) (where |g is not a doublet). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.218 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.053 {I18} (1979Dr08). A{-2}=+0.27 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I19} (1972Re13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.270 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.070 {I22} (1979Dr08). A{-2}=+0.33 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I21} (1972Re13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.272 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.099 {I21} (1979Dr08). A{-2}=+0.46 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I15} (1972Re13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from intensity balance at 508.2 level; I|g=94 {I5} for doublet. 
A{-2}=+0.260 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (1979Dr08) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.52 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I23} (1972Re13). 
I|g for 440.9|g and the two placements of 440.0|g have been estimated from intensity balances at 866.1, 939.8, and 1257.0 levels. I|g(exp)=246 {I13} includes these three components, plus a possible 439.9|g component from {+23}Na contaminant. 
A{-2}=+0.114 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.029 {I13} (1979Dr08) for multiplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement not adopted. In the Adopted Levels, Gammas, this |g is the 25/2 to 21/2 transition in the 5/2[512] band, not the 23/2 to 19/2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I6} (simultaneous measurement of I|g and Ice in calibrated system) (1979Dr08). 
M from |a(K)exp. This value also consistent with E1(+50% M2), but angular distribution data (A{-2}=-0.31 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I16}) imply either <6% or >88% Q admixture (1979Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from delayed intensity balance for 190.6|g-148.9|g cascade (sidefeeding problem eliminated). M1 for 148.9|g and E1 for 190.6|g satisfy equation I|g(148.9|g)(1+|a(148.9|g))=I|g(190.6|g)(1+|a(190.6|g)). E1+M2 also gives required |a, but with prohibitively large M2 strength. 
A{-2}=-0.05 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I7} (1979Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I8} (1979Dr08). 
E$placement not adopted. In the Adopted Levels this |g is the 27/2 to 23/2 transition in the 5/2[512] band, not the 25/2 to 21/2 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI evaluator's interpretation of '85.15' entered in table 1 of 1979Dr08. 
A{-2}=+0.52 {I20}, A{-4}=0.0 {I3} (1972Re13) but {+172}Hf contamination present. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.35 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I6} (1979Dr08); may be unreliable due to difficult background subtraction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M not assigned; 1979Dr08 report A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6}, and 1972Re13, A{-2}=-0.39 {I19}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
I(149|g):I(1133|g)=93 {I3}:100 {I3} at E=200 MeV (1997Cu01). 
M DCO consistent with Q (|DJ=2) or D+Q (|DJ=1); authors propose the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E E|g=361 in figure 1 of 2000Cu01 does not fit placement and is presumed to be a misprint of 351; E|g=350 in fig. 1 of 1997Cu01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M stretched D from DCO; |DJ=0 with large E2 admixture is also consistent with DCO but not likely from decay pattern. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Q(transition)=4.0 {I7} (2000Cu01). 
M$interpreted by authors as Q, |DJ=2, but DCO also consistent with D+Q, |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty given as 0 in table 1 of 2000Cu01. 
$DCO=1.08 {I13}. Interpreted by 2000Cu01 as D+Q transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. Transition required by |g|g 
RI$from I|g(63|g)/I|g(1375|g)=0.3/30 (table II in 1994Wa07). 1994Wa07 state that intensity of 63|g is inferred from the intensity of the 993|g, assuming mult(63|g)=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced (evaluator) from in-out intensity balance at 95 level. 1973Ca10 give I|g=32.3 {I25} which leads to |?20% (negative) imbalance 
CEL=84 17 
M$|a(L)exp=2.6 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.363 9, CEL=0.10 2$ 
M$|a(K)exp=0.038 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.011 {I2}; K/L=3.6 {I7}. |a(K)exp is |?20% lower than that for E2 but K/L agrees with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.376 8, CEL=0.100 19, CEM=0.056 11 
M$|a(K)exp=0.047 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.013 {I3}, |a(M)exp=0.007 {I1}. Authors' uncertainty of 0.001 for |a(K)exp increased to 0.002 
X(E0/E2)=0.156 {I21} (1973Ca10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.290 6 
M$|a(K)exp=0.050 {I2}. Authors' uncertainty of 0.001 is increased to 0.002. K/L/M=100 {I2}/22.4 {I7}/11 {I4} 
X(E0/E2)=0.154 {I32} (1973Ca10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$ce observed (ce(K)=0.33 {I4}, ce(L)=0.044 {I13}), no |g ray reported 
X(E0/E2)=19 {I4} (1973Ca10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$ce observed (ce(K)=0.65 {I5},ce(L)=0.115 {I17},ce(M)=0.013 {I8}), no |g ray reported 
X(E0/E2)=6.0 {I7} (1973Ca10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.370 5, CEL=0.043 11, CEM=0.019 9 
M$|a(K)exp=0.080 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0093 {I24}, |a(M)exp=0.0041 {I19}. Authors' uncertainty of 0.001 for |a(K)exp increased to 0.002 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
CEK=0.094 23 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I9} gives E1+M2 with |d=0.5 {I1} or E2(+M1) with |d>0.9. But placement requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$from adopted gammas. 1973Ca10 interpret broadening of the peak due to 872.1|g as mixed with an impurity, but it is possible that part of this line is due, instead, to 875|g. It is assumed that the same level is populated in {+172}Ta |e decay and (HI,xn|g) reactions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.261 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.098 {I11} 
A2=0.33 2, A4=-0.07 2 (1975Sk01) 
A2=0.240 6, A4=-0.062 7 (1967Ne02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.284 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.087 {I11} 
A2=0.34 2, A4=-0.07 3 (1975Sk01) 
A2=0.318 10, A4=-0.036 11 (1967Di07) 
A2=0.325 10, A4=-0.039 12 (1967Ne02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.309 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.098 {I11} 
A2=0.36 3, A4=-0.09 3 (1975Sk01) 
A2=0.340 16, A4=-0.049 18 (1967Ne02) 
DCO=0.99 {I3} (1980Wa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.325 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.108 {I11} 
A2=0.36 3, A4=-0.08 3 (1975Sk01) 
A2=0.37 3, A4=-0.07 3 (1967Ne02) 
DCO=0.96 {I3} (1980Wa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.327 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.120 {I11} 
A2=0.36 3, A4=-0.11 4 (1975Sk01) 
A2=0.37 5, A4=-0.08 5 (1967Ne02) 
DCO=0.99 {I4} (1980Wa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.299 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.116 {I17} 
A2=0.31 5, A4=-0.09 7 (1975Sk01) 
A2=0.38 11, A4=-0.12 12 (1967Ne02) 
DCO=1.00 {I6} (1980Wa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
For 621.1|g+622.6|g+623.2: A{-2}=0.260 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} 
A2=0.31 6, A4=-0.16 8 (1975Sk01) 
DCO=0.99 {I7} (1980Wa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$ Poor fit. Level-energy difference=92.8 2. Note that E|g=92.9 5 in authors' earlier paper (1995Cu03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$ Poor fit. Level-energy difference=835.2 3. Note that E|g=838.2 5 in authors' earlier paper (1995Cu03). 
DCO=0.67 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ From level-energy difference (compilers). A 665.5 13 gamma (I|g=0.1 1) E2, proposed (by 1998Cu04) to deexcite this level does not fit the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ According to e-mail reply of July 28, 2008 from Dr. McCutchan, 742.3 in the table is a misprint. It should be 743.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ According to e-mail reply of July 28, 2008 from Dr. McCutchan, 1418.7 in the table is a misprint. It should be 1419.7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ (214|g)(95|g): R{-exp}(145|',3.80t)=1.031 {I6}, R{-exp}(145|',5.55t)=1.017 {I7}, R{-exp}(180|',3.80t)=1.021 {I8}, R{-exp}(180|',5.55t)=1.019 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ (776|g)(95|g): R{-exp}(145|',3.80t)=1.36 {I8}, R{-exp}(145|',5.55t)=1.61 {I12}, R{-exp}(180|',3.80t)=1.08 {I7}, R{-exp}(180|',5.55t)=1.07 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ (858|g)(95|g): R{-exp}(145|',3.80t)=1.17 {I5}, R{-exp}(145|',5.55t)=1.22 {I6}, R{-exp}(180|',3.80t)=1.08 {I7}, R{-exp}(180|',5.55t)=1.07 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ (980|g)(95|g): R{-exp}(145|',3.80t)=1.10 {I5}, R{-exp}(145|',5.55t)=1.09 {I5}, R{-exp}(180|',3.80t)=1.04 {I8}, R{-exp}(180|',5.55t)=0.95 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ (1086|g)(95|g): R{-exp}(145|',3.80t)=0.97 {I3}, R{-exp}(145|',5.55t)=0.97 {I3}, R{-exp}(180|',3.80t)=1.00 {I5}, R{-exp}(180|',5.55t)=1.01 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ (1241|g)(95|g): R{-exp}(145|',3.80t)=0.87 {I8}, R{-exp}(145|',5.55t)=0.98 {I12}, R{-exp}(180|',3.80t)=1.14 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$2015Ru03 quote B(E2)(W.u.)=199 {I3} from |t=1.70 ns {I2} measured using (ce)(ce)(t) technique by J.-M. Regis, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cologne (2011) (https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/4290/) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Very weak transition seen in ce spectrum only (Ice(K) (unresolved doublet)|<9, relative to Ice(K)=280 for 90.1|g+90.3|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Properties of analogous transitions in {+169}Yb and {+171}Yb were used to separate the complex 90-keV peak (E|g=90.3 {I1}, I|g=31 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.68 {I12}) into an E1 component (E|g=90.3 {I1}, I|g=28.8 {I29}) and an M1+E2 component (E|g=90.1 {I2}, I|g=2.2 {I6}, |d=0.23 {I2}). E|g=90.1 {I2}, as determined from ce data (1968Ha39), is attributed to the M1+E2 component, and E|g=90.3 {I1} (1973Re03), to the E1 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a=1.43 {I9}, as deduced from conversion-corrected intensity balance at 106.6 level. |a(E1 theory)=1.47. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.155 (1975Ca11); ce(K):ce(L):ce(M) 155:77 {I5}:24.5 {I24}; ce(K):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) 41:23:13:9 (1968Ha39). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC experimental value from 1975Ca11, 1971Ch26. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.048 {I14}, ce(K)/ce(L)=5.25 {I82} (1975Ca11,1971Ch26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) if D+Q and |DJ=0 (1971Ej01). |a(K)exp=0.10 {I1}, deduced by evaluator from data of 1971Ej01, suggests M1(+E2)+E0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) if D+Q and |DJ=0 (1971Ej01). |a(K)exp=0.09 {I1}, deduced by evaluator from data of 1971Ej01, suggests M1(+E2)+E0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) if D+Q and |DJ=0 (1971Ej01). |a(K)exp=0.09 {I2}, deduced by evaluator from data of 1971Ej01, suggests M1(+E2)+E0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty not given by 2008Mc01, 0.10 keV assigned by the compilers in comparison to similar uncertainties for other |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ According to e-mail reply of July 28, 2008 from Dr. McCutchan, 898.15 in the table is a misprint. It should be 895.15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$2015Ru03 quote B(E2)(W.u.)=201 {I3} from |t=1.79 ns {I2} measured using (ce)(ce)(t) technique by J.-M. Regis, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cologne (2011) (https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/4290/) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluator from Ice(L)|?44 (1960Ha18) and |a(L)(theory)=5.51. 
M,MR$from L1:L2:L3:M=7:20:|?19:|?9 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluator from Ice(K)=2.5 (1960Ha18) and |a(K)(theory)=1.22. I|g<22 reported by 1971Ga38. 
M$from K:L1:L2:L3=2.5:|?1:|?7:6.5 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluator from Ice(L23)=57 and |a(L2) + |a(L3)(theory)=6.22. 
M,MR$from L1:L2:L3:M:N|?30:29:28:|?20:6 (1960Ha18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
CC experimental value from {+176}Ta |e decay. 
M |d(M2/E1)=0.36 {I5}, |d(E3/E1)=0.53 {I7} (1972Lo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
|DJ=0,1 transitions from members of the octupole band (K|p=2-) to those of the g.s. rotational band (K|p=0+) are expected to have a significant E3 multipolarity component (1972Lo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M Reported as (E2) from conversion electron measurement in {+174}Yb(|a,2n|g), level scheme requires (M1+E2). 
M 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced by evaluator from I|g(1115|g)/I|g(156.8|g)=0.85 from the 1404 level in {+174}Yb(|a,2n|g), and I|g(1115|g)=9.2 {I7} for the doublet in {+176}Ta |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 401.4 keV {I5} (1975Ar11), 401.1 keV {I2} (1973Ko22), and 401.0 keV {I5} (1992Da03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.32 {I3} (1973Ko22), 0.365 {I22} (1983Sa44), and 0.48 {I3} (1992Da03). Other value: 0.9 {I2} (1975Ar11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from bent-crystal measurement of 1962Ha46. 
M from |a(K)exp=1.18 {I12} (1971Ge11) and ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp = 8.7 {I9}: 104 {I2}: 100 (1966Ha08,1966St01). Others: 1952Mi18, 1952Sc08, 1957Mc34, 1961Re09, 1962Fo15, 1962Re08, 1964He17, 1964Th02, 1965Av01, 1966Ba30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2+E3
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0029 and ce(K)/ce(L) exp=6.2. Matrix element ratios <M2>/<E1> =0.359 {I49}; <E3>/<E1> =0.529 {I66} were deduced by 1972Lo03 from |a(K)exp and ce(K)/ce(L) of 1971Be10. See also 1972Lo03 for a reanalysis of |g|g(|q) data from 1971Bo16. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 1971Be10 also placed this transition from an additional 1819 level based only on energy differences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp=0.51, deduced in 1971Be10 with ce data from 1960Ha18. Level scheme requires M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Obscured by {+175}Ta 125.9- and 126.6-keV |g rays. Assignment to {+176}Ta based on coincidence results. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Obscured by {+175}Ta 207.4-keV |g ray, and {+177}Ta 208.4-keV |g ray. Assignment to {+176}Hf based on coincidence results. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Reported as (E1,E2) from |a(K)exp|?0.0015 for Ice(1307.0|g + 1306.8|g) (1973Kh03,1973Kh08). Level scheme requires (M1+E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M E1 or E2 from |a|<0.26, deduced from transition intensity balance (1975Kh04). Decay scheme requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M E1 or E2 from |a|<0.16, deduced from transition intensity balance (1975Kh04). Decay scheme requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Authors presented E|g=1330 (possibly a misprint) and I|g=10 {I5}. Evaluator assumed 1301.3|g is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$ new decay branch from K|p=22- to K|p=14- is identified in 2010Mu13. Its existence implied from feeding of the K|p=14- member states from decay of the 45-|ms isomer in beam-off mode 
$ I(|g+ce)(37|g)/I(|g+ce)(97|g)=8.3 {I28}/91.7 {I78}, obtained by 2010Mu13 from |g|g coin data 
$ Reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=3.2, |n=6 (2010Mu13). Low value is discussed in terms of K-mixing 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) and electron conversion data. The briccmixing program and the following data were used for |d: |d=-4.85 {I5} (1992De53), -4.7 {I3} (1979Er12), -4.8 {I2} (1977Ke12), -4.7 {I2} (1974Kr12), -4.75 {I7} (1972Ho54), -4.5 {I3} (1972Ho39), -5.0 {I6} (1966Bl05, symmetrized from -4.7 {I+8-4}), -4.4 {I3} (1962Ma42), -4.3 {I3} (1958Be23), -4.6 {I4} (1957St07); (K/L)exp=0.82 {I9} (2012De24), |a(K)exp=0.78 {I5}, (L1/L2)exp=0.165 {I10}, (L2/L3)exp=1.15 {I5} and (L1/L3)exp=0.190 {I11} (1974Ag01); (K/L)exp= 0.723 {I23}, (L/M)exp=3.97 {I3}, (L1/L2)exp=0.170 {I3}, (L1/L3)exp= 0.191 {I2}, (L2/L3)exp=1.122 {I8}, (M1/M2)exp=0.152 {I6}, (M1/M3)exp= 0.162 {I6}, (M2/M3)exp=1.066 {I15} (1972Ho39); (K/L)exp=0.58 {I7}, (K/Mn)exp=1.97 {I24}, (L/Mn)exp=3.40 {I16} and |a(L)exp=1.35 {I10} (1961We11). Others (not used in the analysis): |d=-5.5 {I3} (1978Br37), -4.0 {I3} (1974Ag01), -3.7 {I3} (1970Hr01), -3.0 {I8}, -3.1 {I14}, -3.8 {I16}, -3.1 {I12} (1968To07), -5.4 {I4} (1957Of04), -4.0 {I2} (1955Ha84), -4.0 {I2} (1961We11); (K/L)exp=0.59 {I5}, (K/M)exp=1.97 {I16} and (L/M)exp=3.32 {I37} (2011De07), |a(K)exp=0.78 {I5} (1974Je02) and |a(K)exp=0.98 {I15} (1968To07). The sign is from 1974Kr12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d). 
M,MR$Mult. is from |g|g(|q) and electron conversion data. The briccmixing program and the following data were used for |d: |d(|g|g|q)=-3.0 {I7} (1974Kr12); (K/L)exp=1.2 {I4} (2011De07), (L1/L2)exp=0.24 {I6}, (L2/L3)exp=1.12 {I20} and (L1/L3)exp=0.27 {I7} (1974Ag01), (K/L)exp=1.24 {I7} and (L12/L3)exp=1.56 {I15} (1972Gr35). Others (not used in the analysis): (K/M)exp=8.1 {I22} (2012De24); (K/M)exp=2.3 {I10} and (K/L)exp=2.0 {I8} (2011De07); (K/L1)exp=6.1 {I16}, (K/L2)exp=1.45 {I24} and (K/L3)exp=1.62 {I32} (1974Ag01); |a(K)exp=0.42 {I4} and |a(L)exp=0.39 {I3} (1974Je02); (K/L)exp=1.06 {I8} (1961We11). The sign is from 1974Kr12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d). 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.106 {I11} (2012De24), 0.101 {I9} (1974Ag01), 0.090 (1974Je02) and 0.148 {I23} (1961We11); |a(L)exp=0.035 {I3} (1974Je02) and 0.057 {I9} (1961We11); |a(M)exp=0.018 {I3} (1961We11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) (1970Hr01,1974Kr12) and electron conversion data. |a(K)exp=0.90 {I11} (1974Ag01), |a(L1)exp=0.072 {I6} (1972Gr35) and 0.087 {I10} (1974Ag01), |a(L2)exp=0.028 {I3} (1972Gr35) and 0.038 {I8} (1974Ag01), |a(L3)exp=0.030 {I3} (1972Gr35) and 0.033 {I7} (1974Ag01). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.017 {I7} (1970Hr01) and -0.051 {I37} (1974Kr12), and |d(ce data)=0.014 {I57} using the analysis of ce data in 1974Ag01. The sign is from 1970Hr01 and 1974Kr12 
BM2W$Note that B(M2)(W.u.) exceeds RUL, presumably due to anomalous |a (penetration effect) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) (1979Er12,1977Ke12,1974Kr12) and electron conversion data. |a(K)exp=0.0433 {I19} (1972Gr35), 0.046 {I4} (1974Ag01), 0.043 {I4} (1974Je02) and 0.043 {I2} (1961We11); |a(L1)exp=0.0052 {I2} (1972Gr35) and 0.0063 {I6} (1974Ag01),|a(L2)exp=0.00091 {I5} (1972Gr35) and 0.00110 {I12} (1974Ag01),|a(L3)exp=0.00089 {I5} (1972Gr35) and 0.00100 {I12} (1974Ag01), |a(L)exp=0.0098 {I5} (2012De24), 0.0070 {I6} (1974Je02) and 0.0071 {I3} (1961We11); |a(M)exp=0.0020 {I1} (1961We11). Others: 1971Ho37 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=0.08 {I4} (1979Er12), -0.08 {I2} (1977Ke12) and +0.07 {I2} (1974Kr12). The sign is from 1974Kr12 
BM2W$Note that B(M2)(W.u.) exceeds RUL, presumably due to anomalous |a (penetration effect) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) (1979Er12,1974Kr12) and electron conversion data. |a(K)exp=0.094 {I5} (1972Gr35), 0.102 {I13} (1974Ag01), 0.078 {I7} (1974Je02) and 0.080 {I6} (1961We11); |a(L1)exp=0.0136 {I7} (1972Gr35) and 0.0170 {I24} (1974Ag01); |a(L2)exp=0.0023 {I3} (1972Gr35) and 0.0034 {I8} (1974Ag01); |a(L3)exp=0.000350 {I25} (1974Ag01); |a(L)exp=0.017 {I2} (1974Je02) and 0.0176 {I16} (1961We11); |a(M)exp=0.0042 {I9} (1961We11). 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=+0.18 {I1} (1979Er12) and +0.17 {I1} (1974Kr12), and |d(ce data)=0.18 {I5} using the analysis of ce data in 1974Ag01. The sign is from 1974Kr12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.066 {I8} and |a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, DCO(|DJ=2)=0.95 {I4} and DCO(|DJ=1)=1.01 {I9} (1998Mu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) (2014Mu03,1974Kr12,1969Hu06) and electron conversion data. 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.23 {I4} (2014Mu03), -0.36 {I4} (1974Kr12) and -0.344 {I20} (1969Hu06); (K/L)exp=3.8 {I4} (2012De24) and (L2/L1)exp=0.265 {I35} and (L3/L1)exp=0.1922 {I54} (1969Hu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.031 {i3} and |a(L)exp=0.0050 {i5} (1974Je02), and K/L=6.11 {I46}, K/(M+N)=18.5 {I29} and L/(M+N)=3.0 {I5} (1961We11); L2:L3:M23:N=35:23:22:5 (1967Pr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (L2/L1)exp=0.2328 {I56} and (L3/L1)exp=0.1345 {I35} (1969Hu06); (K/L)exp=7.0 {I9}, (K/M)exp=13.0 {I3} and (L/M)exp=1.9 {I5} (2012De24); |g|g(|q) in 2014Mu03, 1974Kr12 and 1969Hu06; A{-2}=-0.53 {I2}; DCO(|DJ=2)=0.63 {I7}; DCO(|DJ=1)=0.50 {I5} (1998Mu14) 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.34 {I3} (2014Mu03), -0.37 {I6} (1974Kr12) and -0.371 {I20} (1969Hu06); (L2/L1)exp=0.2328 {I56} and (L3/L1)exp=0.1345 {I35} (1969Hu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From (K/L)exp=2.5 {I4}, |a(K)exp=0.112 {I11} and |a(L)exp=0.046 {I6} (2012De24); DCO(|DJ=2)=1.2 {I3} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 5.6 {I5} (2014La20), 6.0 {I7} (2012De24), 5.43 {I33} (1998Mu14), 5.4 {I13} (1972Ch48) and 5.8 {I10} (1967Ha09). Other: 7.4 {I7} (1981Hn03) 
M$DCO(|DJ=2)=0.51 {i13} (1998Mu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.040 {I4} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, DCO(|DJ=2)=0.96 {I6} and DCO(|DJ=1)=0.83 {I8} (1998Mu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (L2/L1)exp=0.2215 {I80} and (L3/L1)exp=0.116 {I10} (1969Hu06), (K/M)exp=21.9 {I27} (2012De24) and |g|g(|q) in 2014Mu03, 1974Kr12 and 1969Hu06. 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.317 {I13} (2014Mu03), -0.33 {I5} (1974Kr12) and -0.362 {I16} (1969Hu06); (L2/L1)exp=0.2215 {I80} and (L3/L1)exp=0.116 {I10} (1969Hu06); (K/M)exp=21.9 {I27} (2012De24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.071 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.027 {I1} and |a(M)exp=0.0096 {I12} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.30 {I2} and DCO(|DJ=1)=1.14 {I22} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 2012De24. Other: 203.0 keV (1998Mu14) 
RI$Weighted average of 3.9 {I4} (2014La20), 3.9 {I4} (2012De24), and 3.9 {I3} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.026 {I3} and |a(L)exp=0.011 {I1} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, DCO(|DJ=2)=0.95 {I7}, and DCO(|DJ=1)=0.97 {I9} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (K/M)exp=14.6 {I38} (2012De24) and |g|g(|q) in 2014Mu03, 1974Kr12 and 1969Hu06. 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.296 {I13} (2014Mu03), -0.32 {I4} (1974Kr12) and -0.376 {I26} (1969Hu06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.045 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.013 {I1} and |a(M)exp=0.0035 {I6} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.18 {I2}, DCO(|DJ=2)=0.84 {I22} and DCO(|DJ=1)=1.26 {I14} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (L2/L1)exp=0.167 {I13} and (L3/L1)exp=0.0685 {I34} (1969Hu06); (K/L)exp=5.6 {I4},(K/M)exp=24.3 {I51} and (L/M)exp=4.4 {I9} (2012De24); |g|g(|q) in 2014Mu03, 1974Kr12 and 1969Hu06. 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.289 {I13} (2014Mu03), -0.33 {I5} (1974Kr12) and -0.358 {I34} (1969Hu06); (L2/L1)exp=0.167 {I13} and (L3/L1)exp=0.0685 {I34} (1969Hu06); (K/L)exp=5.6 {I4}, (K/M)exp=24.3 {I51} and (L/M)exp=4.4 {I9} (2012De24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 2012De24. Other: 242.07 {I10} (1981Hn03) 
RI$Unweighted average of 2.31 {I12} (2014La20) and 2.24 {I47} (2012De24). Other: 1.56 {I52} (1981Hn03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.020 {I1} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.15 {I3}, DCO(|DJ=2)=0.81 {I5} and DCO(|DJ=1)=1.01 {I13} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From From (K/L)exp=7.2 {I11} (2012De24) and |g|g(|q) in 1974Kr12 and 1969Hu06. 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following experimental data: |d(|g|g(|q))=-0.29 {I2} (1974Kr12) and -0.334 {I40} (1969Hu06), and (K/L)exp=7.2 {I11} (2012De24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.023 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.0066 {I6} and |a(M)exp=0.0024 {I2} (2012De24); A{-2}=+0.19 {I3}, DCO(|DJ=2)=0.93 {I13} and DCO(|DJ=1)=1.15 {I13} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$From 1964Al04. Other: 55.2 {I1} (2012De24) 
M$|a(t)exp=0.54 {I4} (2013La08,2014La20) from intensity balances, interpreted as anomalous E1. It should be noted that 55.15|g overlaps with the Hf X rays and determination of its |g-ray intensity is not unambiguous. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp=0.0144 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.0243 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0152 {I6}, ce(L1)/ce(L3) exp=0.94 {I4}, and ce(L2)/ce(L3) exp=1.60 {I3} (1990Bu31). |a(K)exp=0.1156 {I59}, |a(L)exp=0.053 {I5} and |a(M)exp=0.0125 {I8} (2012De24); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From measured conversion electron spectra in 1976ReZH ({+176}Yb(|a,3n|g)), but values are not provided by the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (K/L)exp=6.29 {I39} (1972Ch48) and |g(|q) (2014Mu03) {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and (K/L)exp=6.29 {I39} (1972Ch48) and |d=+0.302 {I4} (2014Mu03) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.31 {I1} and DCO(|DJ=1)=0.97 {I3} (1998Mu14). Proposed configuration and deduced transition strength 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I5} and DCO(|DJ=1)=0.60 {I10} (1998Mu14) Proposed configuration and deduced transition strength 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (K/L)exp=6.55 {I47} (1972Ch48) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) A{-2}=+0.18 {I3} and DCO(|DJ=1)=0.77 {I4} (1998Mu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (K/L)exp=6.24 {I51} (1972Ch48) and |g(|q) (2014Mu03) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m); DCO(|DJ=1)=0.74 {I5} (1998Mu14) 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and (K/L)exp=6.24 {I51} (1972Ch48) and |d=0.285 {I5} (2014Mu03) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 19.6 {I16} in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) 
M$(K/L)exp=4.9 {I6} (1972Ch48) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From (K/L)exp=6.26 {I60} (1972Ch48) and |g(|q) (2014Mu03) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m); DCO(|DJ=1)=0.78 {I6} (1998Mu14) 
MR$Using the briccmixing program and (K/L)exp=6.26 {I60} (1972Ch48) and |d=0.278 {I5} (2014Mu03) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 min). 
M$(K/L)exp=0.526 {I17} and [ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3)]exp=0.139 {I14}:1.00 {I5}:0.520 {I26} (1972Ch48) in {+177}Hf IT decay (51.4 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 113-keV level. Values measured in {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d) are 173.0 {I25} (2014La20), 171.7 {I23} (2012De24), 170 {I5} (2012Ko23), 179 {I4} (1981Hn03), 179 {I8} (1972Ch48), 179 {I13} (1967Ha09) and 251 {I13} (1964Al04), but those can be affected from the {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) decay feedings 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 249-keV level, I|g(249.6742|g)=49.2 {I6} and I|g(136.7245|g)/I|g(249.6742|g)=0.2327 {I19}, weighted average of 0.243 {I6} (2012Ko24), 0.234 {I4} (2001Sc23), 0.229 {I3} (1987Me17), 0.223 {I16} (1964Al04) and 0.24 {I8} (1961We11) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) - others: 0.184 {I11} (2016Lu16), 0.274 {I3} (2011De07), 0.274 {I26} (1974Ag01), 0.306 {I22} (1967Ha09)), and 0.234 {I5} (2014La20), 0.236 {I9} (2012Ko23), 0.228 {I10} (1981Hn03), 0.222 {I21} (1972Ch48) and 0.249 {I17} (1967Ha09) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d) - others: 0.315 {I11} (2012De24)and 0.27 {I5} (1964Al04)). Values measured in {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d) are 11.47 {I23} (2014La20), 14.7 {I5} (2012De24), 11.0 {I4} (2012Ko23), 11.4 {I5} (1981Hn03), 11.4 {I11} (1972Ch48), 11.7 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 17 {I3} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 249-keV level and I|g(136.7245|g)/I|g(249.6742|g)=0.2327 {I19}, weighted average of 0.243 {I6} (2012Ko24), 0.234 {I4} (2001Sc23), 0.229 {I3} (1987Me17), 0.223 {I16} (1964Al04) and 0.24 {I8} (1961We11) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) - others: 0.184 {I11} (2016Lu16), 0.274 {I3} (2011De07), 0.274 {I26} (1974Ag01), 0.306 {I22} (1967Ha09)), and 0.234 {I5} (2014La20), 0.236 {I9} (2012Ko23), 0.228 {I10} (1981Hn03), 0.222 {I21} (1972Ch48) and 0.249 {I17} (1967Ha09) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d) - others: 0.315 {I11} (2012De24)and 0.27 {I5} (1964Al04)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 321-keV level, I|g(208.3662|g)=437 {I6} and I|g(71.6418|g)/I|g(208.3662|g)=0.0158 {I4}, weighted average of 0.0152 {I11} (2016Lu16), 0.0163 {I2} (2012Ko24), 0.01674 {I21} (2001Sc23), 0.0171 {I5} (1987Me17), 0.015 {I1} (1974Ag01), 0.0146 {I6} (1967Ha09) and 0.0140 {I10} (1964Al04) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) - others: 0.01780 {I7} (2011De07), 0.0030 {I10} (1961We11) and 0.0091 (1955Ma12)), and 0.0137 {I6} (2014La20), 0.0155 {I11} (2012De24), 0.0128 {I4} (2012Ko23), 0.0158 {I6} (1981Hn03), 0.0145 {I14} (1972Ch48), 0.0137 {I8} (1967Be34), 0.0140 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 0.015 {I3} (1964Al04) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 321-keV level, I|g(71.6418|g)/I|g(208.3662|g)=0.0158 {I4}, weighted average of 0.0152 {I11} (2016Lu16), 0.0163 {I2} (2012Ko24), 0.01674 {I21} (2001Sc23), 0.0171 {I5} (1987Me17), 0.015 {I1} (1974Ag01), 0.0146 {I6} (1967Ha09) and 0.0140 {I10} (1964Al04) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) - others: 0.01780 {I7} (2011De07), 0.0030 {I10} (1961We11) and 0.0091 (1955Ma12)), and 0.0137 {I6} (2014La20), 0.0155 {I11} (2012De24), 0.0128 {I4} (2012Ko23), 0.0158 {I6} (1981Hn03), 0.0145 {I14} (1972Ch48), 0.0137 {I8} (1967Be34), 0.0140 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 0.015 {I3} (1964Al04) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d)), and I|g(321.3159|g)/I|g(208.3662|g)=0.0210 {I3}, weighted average of 0.0189 {I19} (2012Ko24), 0.02002 {I19} (2001Sc23), 0.0217 {I2} (1987Me17), 0.0198 {I18} (1974Ag01), 0.0220 {I12} (1967Ha09), 0.0199 {I14} (1964Al04), 0.0228 {I10} (1961We11) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) - others: 0.0152 {I11} (2016Lu16), 0.02470 {I7} (2011De07) and 0.0146 (1955Ma12)), and 0.0214 {I8} (2014La20), 0.0228 {I4} (2012De24), 0.0199 {I9} (2012Ko23), 0.0203 {I18} (1981Hn03), 0.0227 {I18} (1972Ch48), 0.0191 {I10} (1967Be34), 0.0186 {I21} (1967Ha09) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d) - other: 0.0197 (1964Al04)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 321-keV level and I|g(208.3662|g)=437 {I6} and I|g(321.3159|g)/I|g(208.3662|g)=0.0210 {I3}, weighted average of 0.0189 {I19} (2012Ko24), 0.02002 {I19} (2001Sc23), 0.0217 {I2} (1987Me17), 0.0198 {I18} (1974Ag01), 0.0220 {I12} (1967Ha09), 0.0199 {I14} (1964Al04), 0.0228 {I10} (1961We11) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (6.6 d) - others: 0.0152 {I11} (2016Lu16), 0.02470 {I7} (2011De07) and 0.0146 (1955Ma12)), and 0.0214 {I8} (2014La20), 0.0228 {I4} (2012De24), 0.0199 {I9} (2012Ko23), 0.0203 {I18} (1981Hn03), 0.0227 {I18} (1972Ch48), 0.0191 {I10} (1967Be34), 0.0186 {I21} (1967Ha09) (from {+177}Lu |b{+-} decay (160.4 d) - other: 0.0197 (1964Al04)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 4.2 {I2} (1981Hn03), 4.21 {I9} (2014La20), 4.5 {I5} (2012De24), 4.06 {I14} (2012Ko23), 5.4 {I5} (1967Ha09) and 5.0 {I6} (1972Ch48). Other: 5 {I1} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 40.8 {I12} (1981Hn03), 39.8 {I8} (2014La20), 35.8 {I10} (2012De24), 36.5 {I11} (2012Ko23), 38 {I4} (1967Ha09), 45 {I3} (1972Ch48). Other: 65 {I7} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 28.6 {I4} (2014La20), 29.0 {I5} (2012De24), 28.0 {I9} (1981Hn03), 28.9 {I18} (1972Ch48), 27.8 {I12} (1967Be34), 26 {I3} (1967Ha09). Other: 34 {I3} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 9.9 {I3} (2014La20), 10.42 {I14} (2012De24), 10.9 {I4} (2012Ko23), 10.0 {I4} (1981Hn03), 11.5 {I8} (1972Ch48), 10.5 {I5} (1967Be34) and 9.4 {I7} (1967Ha09). Other: 12 {I2} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 126.1 {I18} (2014La20), 127.3 {I18} (2012De24), 125 {I4} (2012Ko23), 126.6 {I25} (1981Hn03), 127 {I6} (1972Ch48), 127 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 125 {I6} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 7.65 {I13} (2014La20), 7.4 {I4} (1981Hn03), 7.5 {I8} (1972Ch48), 7.7 {I5} (1967Be34), 6.6 {I9} (1967Ha09). Others: 9.1 {I3} (2012De24) and 11 {I2} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From 2012Ko23. Others: 44.5 {I7} (2014La20), 42.6 {I5} (2012De24), 45.3 {I15} (1981Hn03), 47.1 {I23} (1972Ch48), 45 {I4} (1967Ha09) and 43 {I4} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 14.11 {I29} (2014La20), 14.6 {I4} (2012De24), 13.1 {I5} (2012Ko23), 14.9 {I5} (1981Hn03), 14.5 {I12} (1972Ch48), 14.2 {I6} (1967Be34), 14 {I1} (1967Ha09) and 13 {I3} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(181.9|g)/I|g(341.6423|g)=0.0556 {I24} in adopted gammas and I|g(341.6423|g)=13.88 {I22}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 13.8 {I4} (2014La20), 14.4 {I4} (2012De24), 13.4 {I5} (2012Ko23), 13.7 {I6} (1981Hn03), 14.9 {I13} (1972Ch48), 13 {I1} (1967Ha09) and 14 {I4} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.5 {I2} (2014La20), 1.43 {I13} (2012De24), 1.51 {I20} (1981Hn03) and 1.8 {I2} (1967Ha09). Other: 12 {I2} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 130.9 {I14} (2012De24) and 127 {I4} (2012Ko23). Others: 136.2 {I20} (2014La20), 136 {I3} (1981Hn03), 150 {I7} (1972Ch48) 133 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 134 {I7} (1964Al04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 112.6 {I23} (2014La20), 108.2 {I14} (2012De24), 106 {I3} (2012Ko23), 115.2 {I25} (1981Hn03), 117 {I5} (1972Ch48) and 108 {I9} (1967Ha09). Other: 121 {I6} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 13.11 {I29} (2014La20), 11.0 {I5} (2012De24), 12.2 {I5} (2012Ko23), 14.8 {I5} (1981Hn03), 14.3 {I10} (1972Ch48), 12.6 {I7} (1967Be34), 12 {I2} (1967Ha09) and 10 {I2} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 25.4 {I4} (2014La20), 24.9 {I10} (2012De24), 23.1 {I7} (2012Ko23), 26.0 {I8} (1981Hn03), 24.5 {I16} (1972Ch48), and 24 {I2} (1967Ha09). Other: 37 {I7} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 102.5 {I20} (1981Hn03), 100.8 {I14} (2014La20), 94.7 {I14} (2012De24), 93 {I3} (2012Ko23), 96 {I8} (1967Ha09), 105 {I5} (1972Ch48). Other: 110 {I6} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 8.2 {I6} (1981Hn03), 8.1 {I3} (2014La20), 8.3 {I6} (2012Ko23), 7.7 {I9} (1967Ha09) and 8.4 {I8} (1967Be34). Others: 6.3 {I3} (2012De24), 14.9 {I13} (1972Ch48) and 20 {I4} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 145.8 {I28} (2014La20), 148 {I4} (2012De24), 137 {I4} (2012Ko23), 149 {I3} (1981Hn03), 146 {I6} (1972Ch48), 136 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 149 {I15} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(223.3|g)/I|g(426.4726|g)=0.0270 {I17} in adopted gammas and I|g(385.0304|g)=3.56 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average (external uncertainty) of 3.52 {I20} (1981Hn03), 3.64 {I16} (2014La20), 5.7 {I3} (2012De24), 3.56 {I18} (2012Ko23), 3.4 {I4} (1967Ha09) and 3.4 {I4} (1972Ch48). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 111.7 {I25} (1981Hn03), 109.2 {I16} (2014La20), 102.5 {I14} (2012De24), 105 {I3} (2012Ko23), 114 {I8} (1967Ha09) and 119 {I6} (1972Ch48). Other: 130 {I13} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 6.7 {I4} (1981Hn03), 6.75 {I10} (2014La20), 6.7 {I7} (1967Be34) and 5.4 {I3} (2012De24). Others: 7.8 {I9} (1967Ha09), 14.9 {I13} (1972Ch48) and 20 {I4} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 246 {I6} (1981Hn03), 241 {I5} (2014La20), 227 {I3} (2012De24) and 232 {I11} (1972Ch48), 224 {I7} (2012Ko23), 222 {I17} (1967Ha09) and 223 {I22} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.458 {I24} (2014La20) and 0.43 {I9} (2012De24). Other: 0.30 {I10} (1981Hn03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 19.2 {I15} (1981Hn03), 19.8 {I3} (2014La20), 19.2 {I3} (2012De24), 19.4 {I13} (1972Ch48) and 19 {I2} (1967Ha09). Others: 17.4 {I5} (2012Ko23) and 23 {I7} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 53.7 {I15} (1981Hn03), 51.8 {I7} (2014La20), 47.6 {I9} (2012De24), 55 {I3} (1972Ch48), 50.7 {I14} (2012Ko23), 48 {I4} (1967Ha09). Other: 79 {I8} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 2.9 {I4} (1981Hn03), 3.23 {I26} (2014La20), 4.3 {I6} (1972Ch48), 4.7 {I12} (1967Ha09), and 2.9 {I5} (1967Be34). Other: 5.12 {I23} (2012De24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 176 {I4} (1981Hn03), 171.7 {I23} (2014La20), 172.1 {I18} (2012De24), 167 {I8} (1972Ch48), 160 {I5} (2012Ko23), 161 {I12} (1967Ha09) and 185 {I19} (1964Al04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences 
RI$Using I(|g+ce)(14.050|g)=253.2 {I16} from transition intensity balance at the 1301-keV level and |a=217. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Using I(|g+ce)(55.15|g)=20.55 {I22} from transition intensity balance at the 1260-keV level and |a=0.333. Others: 13.5 {I10} (2014La20), 14.9 {I9} (2012De24) and 10.0 {I15} (1967Ha09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 301 {I6} (1981Hn03), 296 {I5} (2014La20), 273 {I3} (2012De24), 310 {I13} (1972Ch48), 271 {I8} (2012Ko23) and 287 {I26} (1967Ha09) and the external uncertainty. Other: 340 {I17} (1964Al04). Note, that I|g(228.4838)=282 {I4} from transition intensity balance at the 1086.9-keV level, which is in excellent agreement with the recommend value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.031 {I3} and |a(L)exp=0.0050 {I5} (1974Je02), and K/L=6.11 {i46}, K/(M+N)=18.5 {i29} and L/(M+N)=3.0 {i5} (1961We11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$292.0 keV is reported by 1973Hu04; unresolved doublet 
RI$From 1973Hu04 for 292.0|g; unresolved doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From measured |g(|q) and |a(exp) in 1976ReZH, but individual values are not given by the authors 
RI$From 1973Hu04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. Note, that E|g=153.3 keV is reported by 1998Mu14, but it does not fit the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.03 {I2}. Value in disagreement with that expected for a stretched E2 transition. DCO(|DJ=2)=1.2 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-0.40 {I2}, assuming K=9/2. 
RI$From I|g(242|g)/I|g(502|g)=8.1 {I7} and I|g(502|g)=83 {I3} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
MR$-0.61 {I7}, assuming K=9/2. 
RI$From I|g(325|g)/I|g(567|g)=8.2 {I16} and I|g(567|g)=50.0 {I21} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
MR$-0.27 {I2}, assuming K=9/2. 
RI$From I|g(249|g)/I|g(575|g)=9.7 {I17} and I|g(515|g)=46.7 {I21} (1998Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 60.0 {I5} (2016Dr15), 59.0 {I7} (2012Ko24), 60.1 {I5} (2010Di18), 59.6 {I6} (2001Sc23), 59.6 {I8} (1987Me17), 60 {I5} (1974Ag01), 61 {I4} (1967Ha09), 58 {I4} (1964Al04) and 62 {I2} (1961We11). Others: 55 {I5} (2016Lu16), 62.15 {I5} (2011De07) and 45.5 (1955Ma12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(136.7245|g)/I|g(249.6742|g)=0.2327 {I19} in the Adopted Gammas and I|g(249.6742|g)=1.918 {I10}. Measured values are: 0.32 {I2} (2016Lu16), 0.466 {I12} (2012Ko24), 0.543 {I6} (2011De07), 0.448 {I8} (2001Sc23), 0.457 {I6} (1987Me17), 0.52 {I5} (1974Ag01), 0.56 {I4} (1967Ha09), 0.43 {I3} (1964Al04) and 0.47 {I15} (1961We11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.918 {I12} (2012Ko24), 1.918 {I17} (2001Sc23), 1.9 {I2} (1974Ag01), 1.83 {I12} (1967Ha09), 1.93 {I14} (1964Al04) and 2.00 {I20} (1961We11). Others: 1.74 {I5} (2016Lu16), 1.982 {I4} (2011De07), 2.00 {I2} (1987Me17) and 1.36 (1955Ma12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences 
RI$Using I|g+ce(14.050|g)=253.2 {I16} from transition intensity balance at the 1301-keV level and |a=217. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Using I|g+ce(55.15|g)=20.55 {I22} from transition intensity balance at the 1260-keV level and |a=0.333. Others: 13.5 {I10} (2014La20), 14.9 {I9} (2012De24) and 10.0 {I15} (1967Ha09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$B(E2) for this transition significantly exceeds the RUL, with B(E2)(W.u.)=1.0|*10{+5} {I4}. This suggests a problem with either the T{-1/2} of the level or the I|g of the 62.2|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI observed in {+178}Lu |b{+-} decay (28.4 min) only. Relative intensity: I|g(244)=0.3 {i2} relative to I|g(204)=3.9 {i9} (1973Or03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E unobserved transition, energy from adjusted level energy differences in {+178}Hf IT decay (31 y). 
RI from evaluator estimate in {+178}Hf IT decay (31 y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
 -ea- 1975Ka15 report Eg=203.8(2) keV, Ig=5.1(14), deexciting the 1513 keV level, and Eg=204.1(2), Ig=1.1(3), from the 1566 keV level. 1973Or03 report a single gamma Eg=203.8(5), Ig=3.9(9). It is not clear if the 1973Or03 data contain contributions from both transitions. Adopting the 1975Ka15 values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
|d(M2/E1)|<0.036 from |a(exp)=0.52 {I3} (1980Va04). |d(E3/E1)|<0.007 from ce(L1)/ce(L2) exp=0.32 (1960Ha18,1980Va04). 
M from |a(exp)=0.52 {I3}, |a(L12)exp=0.058 {I13}, and |a(M)exp=0.019 {I6} (1980Va04). |a(K)exp=0.59 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.089 {I21}, and |a(M)exp=0.030 {I7} from 1976De20 indicate a possible M2 admixture of 0.24% {I11}. Other values: |a(exp)=0.480 {I9}, |a(K)exp=0.398 {I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.0378 {I19}, |a(L2)exp=0.0130 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0148 {I8} (1989Ki24). Values are relative to |a(K)(93|g,E2)=1.11 and |a(K)(325|g,E2)=0.0444 from theory. 
RI I|g(88|g)/I|g(93|g)=3.864 {I24} (1989Ki24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI not observed. I|g<0.016% at 90% confidence level. Other values from Ice(K)(515|g)/Ice(K)(426|g)|<0.00073: I|g(515|g)|<0.046, (if E3), I|g(515|g)|<0.014 (if M2) (1989Ki24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Experiment: |a(K)=0.93 {i23}, |a(L)=2.68 {i16}, |a(M)=0.85 {i6} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)=1.08, |a(L)=2.72, |a(M)=0.68. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Experiment: |a(K)=0.148 {i7}, |a(L)=0.071 {i4}, |a(M)=0.0195 {i10} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.140, |a(K)(M3)=6.63, |a(L)(E2)=0.070, |a(L)(M3)=2.79, |a(M)(E2)=0.0172, |a(M)(M3)=0.708. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.0443 {i20}, |a(L)(exp)=0.0124 {i8}, |a(M)(exp)=0.0050 {i8} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0441, |a(K)(M3)=1.381, |a(L)(E2)=0.0138, |a(L)(M3)=0.412, |a(M)(E2)=0.0033, |a(M)(M3)=0.101. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.0217 {i10}, |a(L)(exp)=0.0056 {i7}, |a(M)(exp)=0.0015 {i4} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0221, |a(L)(E2)=0.0055, |a(M)(E2)=0.0013. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$Experiment: |a(tot)=0.52 {i3}, |a(L1+L2)=0.058 {i13}, |a(M)=0.019 {i6} (1980Va04); |a(K)=0.59 {i9}, |a(L)=0.089 {i21}, |a(M)=0.030 {i7} (1976De20). Theory: |a(tot)(E1)=0.487, |a(tot)(M2)=57.4, |a(K)(E1)=0.4, |a(K)(M2)=39.8, |a(L)(E1)=0.069, |a(L)(M2)=13.4, |a(L1+L2)(E1)=0.054, |a(L1+L2)(M2)=11.0, |a(M)(E1)=0.016, |a(M)(M2)=3.3. The evaluators deduce an average value for the mixing ratio of |d=0.042 {i9}, indicating an upper limit of |?0.3% for any M2 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.207 {i11}, |a(L)(exp)=0.069 {i4}, |a(M)(exp)=0.022 {i1} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.376, |a(K)(E2)=0.134, |a(L)(M1)=0.058, |a(L)(E2)=0.066, |a(M)(M1)=0.013, |a(M)(E2)=0.016. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.165 {i14}, |a(L)(exp)=0.060 {i7} (1976De20)l theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.293, |a(K)(E2)=0.104, |a(L)(M1)=0.045, |a(L)(E2)=0.046. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.095 {i6}, |a(L)(exp)=0.037 {i6}, |a(M)(exp)=0.009 {i3} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.234, |a(K)(E2)=0.083, |a(L)(M1)=0.036, |a(L)(E2)=0.033, |a(M)(M1)=0.0081, |a(M)(E2)=0.0080. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.0174 {i14}, |a(L)(exp)=0.0032 {i7}, |a(M)(exp)=0.0014 {i5} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0154, |a(K)(M3)=0.314, |a(L)(E2)=0.0034, |a(L)(M3)=0.074, |a(M)(E2)=0.00081, |a(M)(M3)=0.0176. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.058 {i8}, |a(L)(exp)=0.024 {i7} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.160, |a(K)(E2)=0.056, |a(L)(M1)=0.0244, |a(L)(E2)=0.0194. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)(exp)=0.0122 {i10}, |a(L)(exp)=0.0023 {i4}, |a(M)(exp)=8.4|*10{+-4} {i23} (1976De20). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0109, |a(K)(M3)=0.191, |a(L)(E2)=0.00223, |a(L)(M3)=0.0418, |a(M)(E2)=5.2|*10{+-4}, |a(M)(M3)=0.0099. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from adjusted level energy differences. 
RI$Estimated by evaluators based on intensity balance at the isomeric level, using theoretical total conversion coefficients, and assuming a pure E3 multipolarity for the 12.7 keV transition. 
M$|a(M)/|a(L)(exp)=0.44 {I+31-23}, 0.3|<|a(L2)/|a(L3)(exp)|<0.7 (1976De20). Note that the range of the measured conversion coefficients allows a significant M4 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4(+E5)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^10
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE5;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE5W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)/|a(K)(exp)=0.55 {i8}, |a(K)(exp)>2.5 (1980Va04); theory: |a(L)/|a(K)=0.50, |a(K)=5.06. These values are consistent with an |d(M4/E5)=0.12 {i10} mixing ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M |a(K)/|a(L)=3.4 {I3} (1974Ha63), |a(K)/|a(L)=5.7 {I4} (1972Gi05), |a(K)/|a(L)=5.7 {I5} (1971Oh03) 
E from 1972Si26. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0124 {I8} (1974Ha63), 0.0139 {I17} (1971Oh03). Also from |g|g(|q) in 1972Li03. 
MR |d=0.41 {I4}, from |g|g(|q) (1972Li03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)/|a(L)/|a(M) 248/43.9 {I20}/ 11.4 {I8} (1974Ha63). |a(K)/|a(L) 248/40.8 {I9} (1972Gi05), |a(K/L)=6.05 {I20} (1971Oh03). Also from |g|g(|q) in 1972Li03. 
E from 1974Ha63. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0076 {I4} and |a(K)/|a(L)=7.1 {I7} (1974Ha63). |a(K)/|a(L)=6.6 {I9} (1972Gi05),|a(K/L)=6.7 {I+14-10} (1971Oh03). Also |g|g(|q) in 1972Li03. 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1972Li03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI,M From 1972Li03 
Seen (for 9.3 m 178Ta |e decay) in singles and |g|g coincidence spectra (gate 1269|g) only in 1972Li03. Not observed in any of the other decay or reaction datasets. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Reported (for 9.3 m 178Ta |e decay) in 1972Li03 (|g|g-coin, gate 1216|g), and in 1972Si26. Not observed in any of the other decay or reaction datasets. In 1972Si26 it is not clear if the listed energy belongs to the "203" gamma (deexciting the 1513 level) and/or the "204" gamma from the 1566 level. Adopting the 1972Li03 data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K/L)|>0.2, |a(L1/L2)|?0.1, |a(L2/L3)=1.05, |a(L/M)=4.0 (1960Ha18); |a(tot)=5.0 {i3} (1963Fo02). Theory: |a(K/L)=0.40, |a(L1/L2)=0.082, |a(L2/L3)=1.06, |a(L/M)=4.0, |a(tot)=4.70. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K/L2)=2.9, |a(K/L3)=4.8, |a(K/M)=6.8, |a(L2/M)=2.4, |a(L3/M)=1.4 (1960Ha18). Theory: |a(K/L2)=4.4, |a(K/L3)=6.2, |a(K/M)=8.1, |a(L2/M)=1.9, |a(L3/M)=1.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K/L2)=5.8, |a(K/L3)=13.8, |a(K/M)=12, |a(L2/M)=2.5, |a(L3/M)=0.9 (1960Ha18). Theory: |a(K/L2)=8.3, |a(K/L3)=14.3, |a(K/M)=13.3, |a(L2/M)=1.6, |a(L3/M)=0.93. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K/L1)=3.8, |a(K/M)=13, |a(L1/M)=3.6 (1960Ha18). Theory: |a(K/L1)=7.9, |a(K/M)=17, |a(L1/M)=2.2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)=0.398 {i9}, |a(L1)=0.0378 {i19}, |a(L2)=0.0130 {i7}, |a(L3)=0.0148 {i8}, |a(M)=0.480 {i9} (1989Ki24). Other: |a(K/L)(exp)|>2.3, |a(L1/L2)(exp)=3.1, |a(L1/L3)(exp)=2.4 (1960Ha18). Theory: |a(K)=0.40, |a(L1)=0.041, |a(L2)=0.0129, |a(L3)=0.0150, |a(K/L)=5.8, |a(L1/L2)=3.2, |a(L1/L3)=2.8. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(216|g)/I|g(213|g)=0.003 {i1} (1979He11). Other: <0.3 (1975Wa24). 
M from adopted values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M Experiment: |a(K)=0.121 {i2}, |a(L2/L1)=0.077 {i7} (1989Ki24). Other values: |a(K/L1)=6.9, |a(K/M)=24 (1960Ha18). |d|<0.063 (1989Ki24) Theory: |a(K)=0.119, |a(L2/L1)=0.083, |a(K/L1)=7.1, |a(K/M)=29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E deduced by evaluators on the basis of the level scheme proposed in 1977Kh01, where the transition is shown in the drawing. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |a=1.5 {I5}, determined from transition intensity balance in a |g-ray spectrum measured between 6 and 230 |ms after irradiation (1977Kh01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
Part of multiplet. The other member is E|g=1016.6 {i4} keV, which is not placed in the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
Unresolved composite line (1974Co02). |g ray reported for the J|p=2+ level only in 1974Co02; not placed as deexciting this state in other experiments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Unresolved composite line (1974Co02). Multiply placed |g ray reported for the J|p=2+ level only in 1974Co02. Placed as deexciting the 1513.9 keV J|p=4+ state in 1977St10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Unresolved composite line (1974Co02). |g ray not placed as deexciting this state in other experiments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Unresolved composite line (1974Co02), multiply placed. |g ray reported for the J|p=2+ level only in 1974Co02; not placed as deexciting this state in other experiments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
This line is a member of a doublet, the other component is at E|g=256.6 keV, not placed in this dataset (1974Co02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
This |g is an unresolved doublet, the members connecting to levels at 1953.7 and 1957.0 keV (1977St10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E 1969Fa01 report a transition with E|g= 5820 keV. This may possibly be an unresolved doublet in their work, comprising the 5816.2 and 5823,2 keV transitions listed in 1977St10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
This |g is an unresolved triplet, connecting to levels at 1512.0 (K|p J=2- 4), 1513.6 (K|p J|p=2- 5) and 1513.9 keV (K|p J=4+ 4) (1977St10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Unresolved doublet in 1979Bo42, deexcites levels at 1174 and 1268 keV. 
RI Estimate based on I|g(doublet)=200 {i30} and the ratio I|g(level 1174)/I|g(level 1268)=0.76 (1979Bo42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(339|g)=19 {I5}, and I|g(1207|g)/I|g(339|g)=2.1 {I1} in adopted gammas. Measured I|g(1207|g)=85 {I10} indicates possible doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1979Bo42 also place this |g ray from the 1513 (J|p=2+) level. However, I|g(1421|g)/I|g(339|g)=1.5 {I5} agrees with 1.08 {I6} for the 1513.7 (J|p=4+) level from adopted gammas, consistent with 1421|g deexciting this level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=11 {I3}, I|g(1254|g + 1468|g)=37 {I6}, and I|g(1254|g + 1468|g)/I|g(1561|g)=4.6 {I3} in adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g|g(|q); A{-2}=0.1846 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.0169 {I14} (2020Zh37) with gate on 495|g Q transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. Others: 0.309 {I15} from B(E2) and T{-1/2}; 0.70 {I+12-11} from |a(K)exp in (n,|g) E=thermal; 0.22 {I+20-22} from |a(L)exp in Hf IT decay (25.05 d); 0.44 {I6} from |a(K)exp in Coulomb excitation; 0.44 {I9} from ce(K)/ce(L) in Coulomb excitation. 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2)=1.76 {I10} for 122 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,M from {+179}Hf IT decay (25.05 d). 
RI from ({+9}Be,|a2n|g). 
MR weighted average of -0.41 {I5} from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation and -0.33 {I8} from |g(|q) in Hf IT decay (25.05 d). Other: 0.26 {I+12-26} from |a(K)exp in Coulomb excitation; inconsistent |a(K)exp in {+179}Hf IT decay (25.05 d) may result from contaminated ce line. |d<0.38 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,M from {+179}Hf IT decay (25.05 d). 
RI from ({+9}Be,|a2n|g). 
From B(E2)|^=0.41 {I5} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI from I(|g+ce)=2917 {I104} from {+179}Hf IT decay (25.05 d) and |a=11500. 
M from {+179}Hf IT decay (25.05 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<|a(K)(E2) for transition with possible ce contamination in (n,|g) E=thermal; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I(1053|g):I(1197|g) for two-photon cascade data in (n,|g) E=thermal assuming 1197|g is not a doublet there. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M M1+E0 from |a(K)exp, but E0 component inconsistent with adopted J|p; it could conceivably arise from an undetected impurity in ce spectrum in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Doublet; branching deduced from suitably divided I|g. 
Other I|g: 133 {I27} in (n,|g) E=7.78 eV res; probably for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Doubly-placed |g in (n,|g) E=7.78 eV res only; E|g does not fit this placement in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
M M1+E0 from |a(K)exp in (n,|g) E=thermal is deduced from ce doublet; evaluator does not consider E0 component sufficiently certain to constitute the basis for a J assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI from I(1078|g doublet):I(1606|g) in (n,|g) E=7.78 eV res. 
|g placed elsewhere in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M anomalous E1 from |a(K)exp and subshell ratios in (n,|g). 
CC experimental value from (n,|g). Other values: 0.055 {I10} (1959Ho91), <0.16 (1966Ve07). |a(theory)=0.0494. 
Other E|g: 1959Ho91, 1951Bu50, 1951Ha84, 1951Ka46. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI from I(|g+ce)(214|g)=I(|g+ce)(160|g) required by intensity balance at 214 level. 
M M3 from |a(K)exp=19.4 {I12}, |a(exp)=35 {I2} (1959Ho91); |a(K)exp=17.5 {I20} (1966Ve07); |a(K)exp=17 {I2} (1968Ka23). 
E other: 1959Ho91. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(L)exp=0.17 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.06 {I2} (1970Hu15). |a(K)exp=1.49 {I16} (1970Hu15) is inconsistent with |a(L)exp, possibly indicating presence of impurity in ce(K) ({Ie.g.}, {+175}Lu(89 ce(L))). 
MR from Adopted Gammas. |d=-0.33 {I8} from |g(|q) (1975Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.67 {I11} (1970Hu15). |a(L)exp=0.12 {I2} (1970Hu15). 
MR from |g(|q) (1975Hu15). Other |d: |<0.8 from |a(K)exp; |<0.46 from |a(L)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.53 {I10} (1970Hu15). |a(L)exp=0.06 {I2} (1970Hu15). 
MR from |g(|q) (1975Hu15). Other |d: |<0.66 from |a(K)exp, |<0.79 from |a(L)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.29 {I5} (1970Hu15). |a(L)exp=0.02 {I1} (1970Hu15). 
MR from |g(|q) (1975Hu15). Other |d: |<0.48 from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
RI I(|g+ce)=140 {I5} from intensity balance at 1084 level. I|g from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
E from 1970Hu15. 
M from ce(L1)/ce(L3) exp |?1 and ce(L2)<<ce(L1) (1970Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from table 1; E=1041.2 in fig. 1 of 2000Mu06. 
A{-2}=+0.24 {I14}; consistent with |DJ=2 placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from fig. 1 of 2000Mu06; erroneously indicated as 25/2- to 21/2- transition in table I (instead of 25/2+ to 21/2+). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.050 {I3} (1989Ri03). K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=51 {I7}:9.5 {I25}:1.2 {I4}:1.0 {I5}:1.2 {I4}:0.5 {I3} (1976Be23). 
|a(exp): from |a(K)exp (1989Ri03) and subshell ratios (1976Be23). Anomalous E1 transition; |a(E1 theory)=0.0494. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.61 {I3} (1989Ri03). K:L1:L2:L3=3 {I1}:0.3 {I2}:1.5 {I5}:1.0 {I5} (1976Be23). |a(K)exp implies |d(M1,E2)>5.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=17.1 {I5} (1989Ri03), 17.3 {I17} (1976Be23). K:L1:L2:L3:(M1+M2):M3:N=505 {I40}:158 {I20}:29 {I9}:100 {I14}:48 {I8}:29 {I5}:18 {I4} (1976Be23). 
I|g=43 {I4} for 161|g triplet in 2007ChZX (Budapest data) is somewhat lower than summed I|g=66.6 for components resolved by 1989Ri03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(L)exp=6.1 {I4} (1989Ri03); L1:L2:M1:M2:N=240 {I40}:28 {I8}:70 {I18}:8 {I2}:23 {I3} (1976Be23). 
MR 0.117 {I+22-26} from |a(L)exp, 0.05 {I8} from subshell ratios. 1989Ri03 deduce |d=0.23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(L)exp=2.45 {I5} (1989Ri03); L1:L2:M1=65 {I10}:5 {I2}:12 {I4} (1976Be23). 
1989Ri03 deduce mult=M1+E2 with |d=0.14; however, |a(L)exp<|a(L)(M1) (2.90) and |d(M1,E2)<0.085 from L1/L2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.98 {I6} (1989Ri03). K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=15 {I5}:3.0 {I15}:23 {I3}:16 {I3}:8 {I3}:7 {I3} (1976Be23). 
M |d(M1,E2)>4.4 from |a(K)exp; M1 component inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=488.2 {I4}, I|g=3.7 {I12} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g is complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR 1989Ri03 deduce |d=0.33. 
|a(K)exp=0.123 {I4} (1989Ri03). 
Other I|g: 208 {I4} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.69 {I15} (1989Ri03). 
M E2+M1 (|d=0.7 {I5}) from |a(K)exp but |a(K)exp may be overestimated due to possible ce contaminant; M1 component inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.431 {I9} (1989Ri03). K:L1:L2:M=30 {I5}:4.5 {I10}:0.4 {I2}:1.2 {I5} (1976Be23). 
MR 1989Ri03 deduce |d|<0.23. 
Other I|g: 52.9 {I19} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.295 {I24} (1989Ri03). K:L1=3.5 {I10}:0.3 {I1} (1976Me23). |a(K)exp consistent with pure M1 (|d(M1,E2)<0.32); however, 1989Ri03 assign mult=M1+E2 with |d=0.37 (inconsistent with 1/2- to 1/2- placement). 
Other: E|g=239.17 {I7}, I|g=18.3 {I11} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=3.21 {I6} (1989Ri03). |a(L1)exp=0.9 {I4} (1976Be23). 
MR 1989Ri03 deduce |d=0.35. 
Other I|g: 4.4 {I12} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.15 {I8} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=139.78 {I21}, I|g=2.7 {I8} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.81 {I11} (1989Ri03). 
MR 1989Ri03 deduce |d=0.23. If authors' datum were |a(L)exp, |d would be 0.61 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.29 {I17} (1989Ri03). 
M |a(K)exp does not preclude a small M1 or M3 admixture; placement requires |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.47 {I7} (1989Ri03). 
M M1+E0 from |a(K)exp but |a(K)exp may be overestimated due to possible ce contaminant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.072 {I6} (1989Ri03). 
M M1+E0 from |a(K)exp; placement requires |DJ=1. 
Other: E|g=486.1 {I3}, I|g=6.7 {I12} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(doublet)=1.82 {I20} and |a(K)exp(doublet)=0.015 {I3} (1989Ri03), and assuming mult=E2, E1 for components from 721, 1186 levels, respectively (from decay scheme), |a(K)(E1)=0.0054 and |a(K)(E2)=0.0146, one can deduce I|g(from 720 level)=1.8 {I6} and I|g(from 1186 level)=0.0 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=87.13 {I11}, I|g=8.8 {I12} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g is complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.029 {I7} (1989Ri03). 
M E2(+M1) (|d(M1,E2)|>1.3) from |a(K)exp; M1 component inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0194 {I12} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=655.70 {I14}, I|g=10.9 {I11} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.103 {I10} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=318.45 {I19}, I|g=4.6 {I10} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.048 {I17} (1989Ri03). 
M M1+E2 from |a(K)exp but |a(K)exp may be overestimated due to possible ce contaminant; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.013 {I4} (1989Ri03). 
M |a(K)exp overlaps |a(K)(E2)=0.0161 (but not |a(K)(E1)=0.0059); however, |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I25} (1989Ri03). 
Tentatively placed by evaluator, consistent with branching in {+179}Lu |b{+-} decay; however, E|g is 6|s too low. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0102 {I21} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=736.1 {I3}, I|g=5.8 {I15} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0093 {I4} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=858.84 {I16}, I|g=15.5 {I15} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I15} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=998.3 {I3}, I|g=7.3 {I19} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E0
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0070 {I3} (1989Ri03). 
RI see comment on 1120|g from 1821 level. 
Other E|g: 1121.27 {I18} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0137 {I15} (1989Ri03). 
M |a(K)exp lies between |a(K)(E1) and |a(K)(E2); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00240 {I19} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=729.84 {I8}, I|g=33.0 {I15} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). possibly |g is complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI see comment on 1046|g from 1726 level. 
|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I6} (1989Ri03) and mult=M1+E2 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0152 {I15} (1989Ri03). 
M |a(K)exp low for E2 (|a(K)(E2)=0.0178) and ce line may include contaminant; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0096 {I15} (1989Ri03). 
M |a(K)exp is intermediate between |a(K)(E2)=0.0162 and |a(K)(E1)=0.0059 and ce line may include contaminant; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0050 {I5} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=571.95 {I11}, I|g=13.4 {I12} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g is close to that reported in {+179}Lu |b{+-} decay for 1199 to 122 transition; however, based on I(1076|g)/I(680|g)=15 {I8} in {+179}Lu |b{+-} decay and I(1076|g)=1.4 in (n,|g) E=thermal, I(681|g)=0.09 {I5} from 1199 level, leaving I(681|g)=0.27 {I7} unplaced in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I10} (1989Ri03), mult=E2(+M1) for doublet. 
RI see comment on 1077|g from 1755.8 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I10} (1989Ri03), mult=M1 for doublet. 
RI I(1199|g)/I(1077|g)=0.600 {I18} in {+179}Lu |b{+-} decay but 1.02 here, so evaluator concludes that 1199|g (I|g=3.1 {I3}) is a doublet with I|g=0.8 placed from the 1199 level, leaving I|g=2.3 unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0207 {I25} (1989Ri03). 
M |a(K)exp is low for E2 (|a(K)(E2)=0.0283) and may be overestimated due to possible ce contaminant; |D|p=yes from placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.023 {I8} (1989Ri03). 
M E2+M1 from |a(K)exp but |D|p=yes from level scheme; evaluator attributes this inconsistency to contamination of ce line. 
Other: E|g=513.8 {I5}, I|g=8 {I3} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). Evaluator suspects |g may be complex in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.014 {I5} (1989Ri03). 
M E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp but |D|p=yes from placement in level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0061 {I14} (1989Ri03). 
M E2 from |a(K)exp, but |a(K)exp may be overestimated due to possible contamination of ce line; |D|p=yes from placement. 
Other: E|g=759.2 {I3}, I|g=6.8 {I19} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0204 {I18} (1989Ri03). 
Other: E|g=635.57 {I21}, I|g=6.0 {I12} (2007ChZX; Budapest data). 


