# LEVEL

level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 4218 {i3} from (e,e'), 4210 {I7} from (p,p'), 4211 {I10} from (t,p) and 4211 {I11} from (t,|a) 
J$L(e,e')=4 and L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2-, but L(t,p)=(0) is in disagreement. 
$B(E4)|^=0.0011 {I3} (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average 4344 {I10} from (t,p), 4347 {I6} from (e,e'), and 4346 {I7} from (p,p') 
J$L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2- gives J|p=(1 to 5)+ for a group at 4358 {I11} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$from (e,e'). Others: 4491 {I10} from (t,p) and 4494 {I7} from (p,p') 
J$L(e,e')=2 from 0+. 
$B(E2)|^=0.0014 {I2} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J$spin=7 from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); L(|a,{+2}He)=7 from 0+. 
$Possible configuration=|ng{-9/2}|np{-3/2}+|ng{-9/2}|n,f{-5/2}{+-1} (1994Pa20). 1990Fi07 suggest configuration=|nf{-5/2}|ng{-9/2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$L(e,e')=2 from 0+; 4572.9|g to 0+, probable 1963|g to 4+. 
$B(E2)|^=0.0013 {I2} in (e,e') (1988Br10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$possible doublet in (p,p'). 
J$L(e,e')=2 from 0+ and L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2-. 
T$from B(E2)|^=0.0030 {I5} in (e,e') (1988Br10) and adopted branching of 4640.3|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 4719 {I3} from (e,e'), and 4720 {I7} from (p,p'). Probable doublet in (p,p'|g) 
J$L(e,e')=4 from 0+ 
$B(E4)|^=0.00040 {I10} (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 4750 {I10} from (t,p), 4760 {I6} from (e,e'), 4762 {I7} from (p,p') and 4762 {I11} from (t,|a) 
J$probable 4759|g to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4886 {I10} from (t,p), 4887 {I6} from (e,e'), 4894 {I7} from (p,p'), and 4888 {I11} from (t,|a) 
J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+ and L(t,|a)=1 from 3/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+:4+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 4958 {I10} from (t,p) and 4966 {I7} from (p,p') 
J$probable 3617|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 4993 {I6} from (e,e'), 4985 {I10} from (t,p), and 4991 {I7} from (p,p'). Others: 5000 {I50} from (d,{+3}He) probably a multiplet; 5011 {I11} from (t,|a) probably a doublet 
J$L(e,e')=2 from 0+. See also comment for 5009 level 
$B(E2)|^=0.0030 {I2} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (p,p'). 
J$L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2- from a probable doublet at 5011 {I11} and L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 3/2- for a probable multiplet at 5000 {I50} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5026 {I10} from (t,p) and 5028 {I10} from (p,p'). 
J$see comment for 5009 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 5085 {I10} from (t,p), 5095 {I3} from (e,e'), 5087 {I10} from (p,p') and 5090 {I11} from (t,|a) 
J$L(e,e')=4 from 0+ and L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2-. 
$B(E4)|^=0.0013 {I3} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 5209 {I10} from (t,p), 5216 {I3} from (e,e'), 5217 {I10} from (p,p') and 5210 {I11} from (t,|a). Other: 5200 {I50} from ({+12}C,{+10}C) 
J$L(e,e')=4 from 0+ and L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2-. 
$B(E4)|^=0.00053 {I14} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3,4+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (p,p') 
J$probable 2675|g to 4+ and 3939|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$from (e,e'). Others: 5370 {I10} from (p,p'), 5378 {I11} from (t,|a) 
J$L(e,e')=3 from 0+ and L(t,|a)=2 from 3/2-. But the 5378 group in (t,|a) may correspond to 5369 and/or 5386. 
$B(E3)|^=0.0020 {I4} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+:4+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (p,p') 
J$probable 3106|g and 4037|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5430 {I50} from (|a,{+2}He), 5410 {I50} from ({+12}C,{+10}C), and 5441 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$L(|a,{+2}He)=5 from 0+; possible configuration=|nf{-5/2}~#|nd{-5/2} (1990Fi07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (e,e'). Other: 5480 {I10} from (p,p'), 5481 {I11} from (t,|a), 5500 {I100} from (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(e,e')=(3) from 0+, but L(t,|a)=1 from 3/2- gives (0 to 3)+. 
$B(E3)|^=0.00067 {I13} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_comment:
J$spin=8 from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); L(|a,{+2}He)=8,(6) from 0+. 
$Possible configuration=|ng{-9/2}{+2} (1990Fi07,1994Pa20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6030 {I50} from (|a,{+2}He) and 6050 {I50} from ({+12}C,{+10}C) 
J$L(|a,{+2}He)=6,(8) from 0+. 
$Possible configuration=|ng{-9/2}|nd{-5/2} (1990Fi07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$from (e,e'). Other: 6121 {I11} from (t,|a) 
J$L(e,e')=3 from 0+ 
$B(E3)|^=0.00118 {I23} from (e,e') (1988Br10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (t,|a) 
J$L(t,|a)=3 from 3/2-; probable 6444|g to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$spin=0 from 2117|g-1346|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th (2020Ma37); primary |g from 1- expected to be E1; 310|g, 492|g and 1187|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E,J$from 2020Ma37. The authors state that J|p=2+ is firmly established in their (n,|g) E=th experiment, but no further details are given. This level is not seen in other studies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$2020Ma37 note that 0+ is established based on a 702|g-3154|g correlation cascade from a (n,|g) E=th experiment at ILL, which has not been published 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$S(n)=9657.46 {I20} (2021Wa16) 
J$s-wave capture in 1/2- ({+63}Ni g.s.), strong |g transition to 0+. The 0- component in the capture state is expected to be negligible 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|b{-2}(neutron)=0.210, |b{-2}(proton)=0.212 (1996La04). Other: |b{-2}=0.139 for |p+ and 0.175 for |p{+-} data (2004Sa28) 
$B(E2)(neutron)=0.125, 0.135 (1996La04), 0.207 (1993Pe09,1989Oa01) 
$B(E2)(proton)=0.078 (1996La04), 0.067 (1993Pe09,1989Oa01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|b{-2}=0.222 (1976Co04), 0.19 {I3} (1996Ch03) in ({+16}O,{+16}O'), 0.104 (1975Re17) in ({+18}O,{+18}O') 
$|b{-2}R=0.90 fm or 0.86 fm (1977We05) ({+16}O,{+16}O'); 0.87 fm (1976Vi01) (({+16}O,{+16}O') and ({+18}O,{+18}O')) 
$B(E2)|^=0.069 {I5} (1996Ch03) in ({+16}O,{+16}O'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{-2}=0.206 {I21} (1989Va02), 0.22 (1976An21), 0.15 {I1} (1969An34), 0.22 (1969Be20), 0.231 (1963Di11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L$from 1987Ba78 
$|b{-2}=0.129 (1987Ba78); 0.139 {I2} or 0.149 {I1} (1985Al24); 0.19 (1975Al34); 0.16 (1974Tr04); 0.17 {I2} (1974Co28); 0.16 (1972Re15); -0.14 (1971Go36). Sign of |b{-2} deduced from relative phase of elastic and inelastic |s(|q) (1971Go36) 
$|b{-2}R=0.96 (1992Yo01), 0.99 fm {I5} (1975Al12), 0.89 fm {I9} (1970Br07) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=8 (1987Ba78), 10.3 (1985Al24), 10.8 (1970Br07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L$from 1987Ba78 
$|b{-4}=0.042 (1987Ba78), 0.032 {I2} (1985Al24). |b{-4}R=0.24 fm {I2} (1970Br07) 
$B(E4)(W.u.)=1.0 (1987Ba78), 1.6 or 1.7 (1985Al24), 0.85 (1970Br07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1985Al24. Others: 3170 (1987Ba78), 3200 (1970Br07) 
L$from 1987Ba78, 1985Al24 and 1970Br07, but 1972He23 quote L(|a,|a')=4 from their unpublished results. A level near this energy is assigned L=4 in (e,e') (3163 level) and (p,p') (3165 level). There are either two separate levels or L-assignment is suspect 
$|b{-2}=0.05 (1987Ba78), 0.04 (1985Al24). |b{-2}R=0.34 fm {I3} (1970Br07) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2 (1987Ba78), 0.5 or 0.8 (1985Al24), 1.6 (1970Br07) 
E,L$1970Br07 give a single group at 3200 with L=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L$from 1987Ba78 
$|b{-3}=0.108 (1987Ba78), 0.123 {I2} or 0.133 {I2} (1985Al24), 0.16 (1975Al34), 0.15 {I2} (1974Co28) 
$|b{-3}R=0.78 (1992Yo01), 0.84 {I6} (1975Al12), 0.73 {I7} (1970Br07) 
$B(E3)(W.u.)=5.7 (1987Ba78), 13.0 or 14.1 (1985Al24), 7.45 (1970Br07), 2.7 (1963Br29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$giant quadrupole resonance from 1992Yo01. 
T$resonance width (1992Yo01) 
$%EWSR=90 {I16} (1992Yo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSA method. Disagrees with value from Coul. Ex. (DSA method and that deduced from B(E2) value), see adopted levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Other: 0.91 ps 4 from B(E2)|^=0.0703 {I29} 
MOME2$reorientation method (1971ChZT,1971ChZF) 
$g factor=+0.184 {I31} (2001Ke02), +0.46 {I13} (1978Ha13) 
$B(E2)|^=0.0703 {I29}, weighted average of 0.070 {I10} (2020Ma37), 0.0718 {I29} (2014Al20), 0.065 {I4} (1971ChZT), 0.087 {I17} (1960An07), 0.077 {I15} (1960An07), 0.090 {I18} (1959Al95) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$from 1969Ma26. 1968Hi06 deduce L=1+3 or 2+3, indicating a probable doublet. For L=3, C{+2}S=1.4-1.6 (1968Hi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=0 from 1680|g-1346|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th (2020Ma37); 1680|g E2, |DJ=2 to 2+ 
T$other: 4.1 ps {I+5-4} from B(E2) measured in Coulomb excitation in (2020Ma37) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from 2403|g-1346|g in (n,|g) E=th (2020Ma37); 2403|g M1+E2 to 2+ 
T$from line-shape analysis for 2403|g observed in {+65}Cu({+11}B,{+12}C) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E,J$from 2020Ma37. The authors state that J|p=2+ is firmly established in their (n,|g) E=th experiment, but no further details are given. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-,1-
level_comment:
$A{-|g}(meV)=340 {I20} 
$E(n)(Lab)=0.5873 keV {I10}. Other: 0.5884 keV {I12} (2015We14) 
$E(n)(Lab)=0.58725 keV {I9} (2013Le01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-,1-
level_comment:
$A{-|g}(meV)=810 {I40} 
$E(n)(Lab)=1.366 keV {I2}. Other: 1.3631 keV {I31} (2015We14) 
$E(n)(Lab)=1.366 keV {I1} (2013Le01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$A{-|g}(meV)=43 {I9} 
S$430 {I9} from 2018MuZY is a misprint. 
$E(n)(Lab)=9.154 keV {I8} 
$E(n)(Lab)=9.154 keV {I4} (2013Le01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$A{-|g}(meV)=100 {I10} 
$E(n)(Lab)=9.776 keV {I6}. Other: 9.787 keV {I18} (2015We14) 
$E(n)(Lab)=9.776 keV {I3} (2013Le01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=+0.11 eb {I3} 
T$mean lifetime |t=1.28 ps {I16} (2022Li54, from E2 matrix element). Same value of T{-1/2} is obtained by compiler. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-0.4 eb {I+1-3} 
T$T{-1/2}=2.65 ps {I+17-25} or |t=3.82 ps {I+25-36} deduced by compiler from B(E2) for 1264|g. 2022Li54 list mean lifetime |t=2.13 ps {I23} or T{-1/2}=1.48 ps {I16} (from E2 matrix element) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=2.04 ps {I13} (2022Li54, from E2 matrix element); for 100% branching through the 1521.6|g. Compiler obtains T{-1/2}=1.42 ps {I9} if 100% branching is considered for the 1521.6|g, same value as in 2022Li54; and 1.26 ps {I9} if deduced branching ratio of 13% {I4} is used for 590.8 transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$T{-1/2}=4.2 ps {I+34-17} or |t=6.1 ps {I+49-25} deduced by compiler from B(E2) for 2972|g, E2 and its |g-branching ratio. 2022Li54 list mean lifetime |t=2.58 ps {I12} or T{-1/2}=1.79 ps {I8} (from E2 matrix element) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=6.5 ps {I9} (2022Li54, from E2 matrix element). Compiler obtains T{-1/2}=4.6 ps {I+7-5} from B(E2) for 1680.1, E2 transition, and its |g-branching ratio; nearly the same value as in 2022Li54 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$T{-1/2}=0.66 ps {I+16-12} or |t=0.95 ps {I+23-17} deduced by compiler from B(E2) for 3275.9|g, E2 and its |g-branching ratio. 2022Li54 list mean lifetime |t=1.1 ps {I8} or T{-1/2}=0.76 ps {I56} (from E2 matrix element) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 2.520 h {I1} (1980RuZY), 2.521 h {I5} (1968Re04), 2.522 h {I7} (1977Ba64), 2.5172 h {I3} (1987Ju05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T weighted mean of 67 |ms {I4} from |g(t) with pulsed beam (1978Ho06) and 73 |ms {I5} from {+64}Ni(d,p|g). Other: >2.0 |ms from {+64}Ni(n,|g) E=thermal 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 25 ns {I5} (1994Pa20), 26.7 ns {I10} (1995Bl01), 25.6 ns {I11} (1997Is13), and 22 ns {I2} (2006Ge16, 2005Ge09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E(level), L, S': from 1963Fu04. Level not observed in other data, probably an impurity. May correspond to {+63}Ni or {+59}Ni peaks labelled by 1970An25. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E(level), L, S': from 1963Fu04. Level not observed in other data, probably an impurity. May correspond to {+63}Ni or {+59}Ni peaks labelled by 1970An25. |DE(level) not given but estimated by the evaluators to be |?20 keV from the resolution. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Possible unresolved doublet indicated by reported L-values. L=3, S'=0.86 (1970An25); L=4, J|p=9/2+, S'=1.5 (1973TyZZ); L=3+4, S'=0.52+1.02 (1970Tu02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L L=1, S'=0.06 (1970An25) but L=2, J|p=5/2+, S'=0.096 (1973TyZZ) and L=2 s'=0.156 for a level at 3032 (1963Fu04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E from 1967Te02. 
L from 1963Fu04, 1970Tu02, 1972Li10. 
S': from 1970Tu02. 
L=0 or 3, J|p=1/2+ or 7/2- reported for a level at 3411 in 1973TyZZ. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E from 1963Fu04. Uncertainty not given but estimated by the evaluators to be |?20 keV from the resolution. Note: a level at 5840 {I15} is reported in 1983ScZL. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E from 1963Fu04. Uncertainty not given but estimated by the evaluators to be |?20 keV from the resolution. Note: a level at 6040 {I15} is reported in 1983ScZL. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E from 1963Fu04. Uncertainty not given but estimated by the evaluators to be |?20 keV from the resolution. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E from measured E|g (1978Mu05). 
T from measurement of delayed-|g coincidence with pulsed-beam in {+64}Ni(d,p|g) data (1978Mu05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$level energy mentioned in the text in the context of 1609 -> 310 ->0 cascade seen in particle-|g coin spectrum. In a previous (d,p) work, there was a level proposed at 1603 keV {I10} with L(d,p)=2, implying J|p=3/2+,5/2+ (1970An25: Nucl. Phys. A157, 561) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from text, listed as 2300 in Table II of 2017Cr04. This level corresponds to known levels at 2302, 2325 and 2336. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
T$2020Po12 quote reference 28 for lifetime of |?0.7 ps (assumed here as mean lifetime) from another work to be published by M. Sferrazza et al. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$2020Po12 quote reference 28 for lifetime of <300 fs (assumed here as mean lifetime) from another work to be published by M. Sferrazza et al. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$6098.3 {I4} in 2020Po12. S(n)=6098.08 {I14} (2017Wa10: AME-2016) 
J$s-wave capture in 0+ g.s. of {+64}Ni 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+60}Ni,{+65}Ni)=0.385 fm{+2} {I18}. Total charge radius R{-c}=3.856 fm {I3} (2022Ma04) 
$isotope shift |d|n({+60}Ni,{+65}Ni)=1317.5 MHz {I26}(stat) {I94}(syst) (2022Ma04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T from {+66}Ni |b{+-} decay, weighted average of 55.1 h {I10} (1956Jo20), 54.8 h {I3} (1956Kj07), and 53.5 h {I7} (1956Ru45). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J (4+) from L(t,p)=(4) disagrees with (5-) yrast state in (HI,xn|g) suggested from analogy with {+64}Ni 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J L(|a,{+2}He)=(5). At the largest angle measured, this level could not be separated clearly from the 5170 level with a dominant configuration=(|n g{-9/2}){++2}{-8+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
configuration: at the largest angle measured, this level could not be separated clearly from the 5170 level with a dominant configuration=(|n g{-9/2}){++2}{-8+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Interpreted as oblate state 
$Branching for E0 transition is deduced as |<0.1% from theoretical monopole transition strengths |r{+2}(E0)|<0.018 (2017Le06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Interpreted as prolate state 
$Branching for E0 transition is deduced as |<3% from theoretical monopole transition strengths |r{+2}(E0)|<0.09 (2017Le06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$A 1020 {I1} gamma in 1988Bo06 (Nucl. Phys. A477, 89) from {+66}Co decay was not seen by 2017Ol01. Note that this level with a 1018 gamma from it is populated in in-beam |g-ray studies (e.g. in 2012Br15, and 2017Le06 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 162502) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g|g(|q) in 2012Br15. Note that J|p=(3+) in {+66}Ni Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (March 2009 update) is incorrect 
T$from |b(1245.6|g)(t), weighted average of four measurements (2017Ol03). Note that the half-life determined by recoil-distance method using a plunger system is measured as 134 ps {I9} by 2017Le06. The two values differ by about 3|s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+60}Ni,{+66}Ni)=0.493 fm{+2} {I17}. Total charge radius R{-c}=3.870 fm {I3} (2022Ma04) 
$isotope shift |d|n({+60}Ni,{+66}Ni)=1526.8 MHz {I26}(stat) {I113}(syst) (2022Ma04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1 from NMR on oriented nuclei 
T from {+67}Ni |b{+-} decay (1983Ru06) 
J$Allowed |b{+-} to 67Cu, 3/2-(gs). From shell model configuration=(|n p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from log| {Ift} 4.2 for |b{+-} decay from (7/2-) level; |g to (1/2)-. Configuration=(|n f{-5/2}){+-1} (1998Gr14) 
T$From 2003Ma50 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
MOMM1$from g=0.125 {I6} (2002Ge16,2004Ge11); 
J$from assigned multipolarity and expected configuration=(|n g{-9/2}) (1998Gr14). 
T from 1998Gr14. Others: >0.3 |ms (1994Pa20,1994Pa32), >0.6 |ms (1997Is13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$from assigned multipolarity and expected configuration=(|n g{-9/2}) (1998Gr14). 
T from 1998Gr14. Others: >0.3 |ms (1994Pa20,1994Pa32), >0.6 |ms (1997Is13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
L$|s(|q) gives L=3,4, but 9/2+ requires L=4 
$Configuration=|ng{-9/2} 
$Feeding=3.6% 
T$from |g|g(t) (2014Di08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)
level_comment:
L$|s(|q) distribution and DWBA analysis exclude L|>3 
J$low-spin from |g decay pattern, further 1/2+ is favored from transition strength to this level. 1/2- would imply an unphysical large spectroscopic factor of 1.9 {I5} 
$Feeding=27.4% 
$Possible configuration=|ns{-1/2} 
S$1.1 {I3} for 1/2+, 1.9 {I5} for 1/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
L$1,2,3 from |s(|q) obtained from gate on 694|g, but L=3 adopted based on additional information 
$Feeding=0.8% {I12}. |s(total)=0.64 mb 
$Asymptotic Normalization Constant (ANC)=0.6 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
L$3.4 from |s(|q) obtained from gate on delayed |g-coin, but L=4 adopted based on additional information. Note that 2015Di04 underline L=3 in Table III, which seems a misprint 
$Configuration=|ng{-9/2} 
$Feeding=3.6% {I22} 
T$from |g|g(t) (2015Di04,2014Di08). Weighted averaged value from 2015Di04, 13.3 |ms {I2} (1998Gr14: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 766) and 13 |ms {I1} (2002Ge16: J. Phys. G28, 2993) is 13.3 |ms {I2} (2015Di04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|s(|q) obtained from gate on 1724|g 
$Feeding=2.6% {I12}. |s(total)=2.85 mb 
$Asymptotic Normalization Constant (ANC)=2.5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
L$1,2 from |s(|q) obtained from gates on 483|g, 1201|g and delayed- gamma coin, but L=2 adopted based on additional information. 
$Feeding=5.8% {I6}. |s(total)=4.6 mb 
$Configuration=|nd{-5/2} 
$Asymptotic Normalization Constant (ANC)=0.6 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
L$1,2 from |s(|q) obtained from gates on 1070|g, 2270|g, 2583|g, and delayed |g-coin, but L=2 adopted based on additional information. 
$Feeding=8.2% {I5}. |s(total)=6.8 mb 
$Configuration=|nd{-5/2} 
$Asymptotic Normalization Constant (ANC)=0.2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Feeding=8.0% {I12}. |s(total)=6.4 mb 
$|s(|q) obtained from gates on 2697|g, 1354|g, 1184|g, and 1054|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
L$1,2 from best fit of |s(|q) obtained from gates on 1896|g and 3621|g, and DWBA analysis; but L=0 is not ruled out 
J$low-spin from |g decay pattern, further 1/2+ is favored from transition strength to this level. 1/2- would imply an unphysically large spectroscopic factor of |?2 
$Feeding=27.4% {I27}. |s(total)=30.6 mb 
$Possible configuration=|ns{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+60}Ni,{+67}Ni)=0.514 fm{+2} {I25}. Total charge radius R{-c}=3.873 fm {I3} (2022Ma04) 
$isotope shift |d|n({+60}Ni,{+67}Ni)=1796.6 MHz {I26}(stat) {I130}(syst) (2022Ma04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 1998Fr15. The authors also give this value in 2001Fr21. Other: 19 s {I+3-6} (1988ScZH,1988KoZT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in {+58}Ni({+70}Zn,X|g). Others: 211 ns {I50} from I(ce)(t) and I(e{++},e{+-})(t) in ({+14}C,{+16}O|g), and 340 ns {I30} from |g(t) in ({+86}Kr,X|g). 
J$L=0 in ({+14}C,{+16}O); E0 transition to 0+ g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced from B(E2)=0.026 {I4} in Coulomb Excitation and adopted |g-ray properties. 
J$L=2 in ({+14}C,{+16}O); Coulomb Excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$assuming that the 511|g's observed in {+68}Co |b- decay (1.6 s) originate from pair production to the g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from 0.86 ms {I5} in {+130}Te({+64}Ni,X|g),{+208}Pb({+64}Ni,X|g) and 0.86 ms {I5} in Ni({+86}Kr,X|g), both from |g(t) 
J$E3 815|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$The relative order of the 324|g-272|g cascade is reversed in {+198}Pt({+70}Zn,X|g) giving a level at 3172.7 rather than 3120.9. The evaluator adopts the ordering given in {+68}Co |b decay (0.20 s) since I|g(272|g)>I|g(324|g) in that decay. The in-beam I|g data are consistent with this order. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-,7-)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.46 from J|p=(7-), 595|g to 5-. 
$Member of |nf{+-1}{-7/2}|ng{++1}{-9/2} multiplet (2000Mu10). A simple |d interaction predicts J|p=7- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.78 from J|p=(7-), 709|g to 5- 
$Member of |nf{+-1}{-7/2}|ng{++1}{-9/2} multiplet (2000Mu10). A simple |d interaction predicts J|p=6- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
BE2$weighted average of 0.0255 {I60} (2002So03) from |s(0{++}|)2{++})=105 mb {I25}, 0.026 {I6} (2002So03) relative to B(E2)({+70}Zn)=0.148 {I7} and 0.028 {I+12-10} (2008Br18). Other: 0.029 {I7} earlier result from same experimental setup as 2002So03 given in 2000Az01, 2000Az03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(d|s/d|W{-exp})/(d|s/d|W{-DWBA})=0.4 
L$strong forward enhancement characteristic of L=0 observed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(d|s/d|W{-exp})/(d|s/d|W{-DWBA})=0.13 
L$strong forward enhancement characteristic of L=0 observed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+60}Ni,{+68}Ni)=+0.620 fm{+2} {I21}; deduced total charge radius R{-c}({+68}Ni)=3.887 fm {I3} (2020Ka22) 
$Measured isotope shift |d|n({+60}Ni,{+68}Ni)=+1992.3 MHz {I27}(stat) {I147}(syst) (2020Ka22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$the same level is quoted at 1770 keV {I30} for {+68}Ni Adopted Levels in ENSDF database, energy obtained from reaction data. In another reaction study at NSCL-MSU by 2013Re18, first 0+ level was established at 1603.5 keV {I3} keV 
T$from time difference between |b-decay electrons and internal conversion (2014Su05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$soft isoscalar giant monopole resonance (2014Va07,2015Va13) from (|a,|a'), 12.6 MeV {I3} from (d,d'), a new type of neutron-dominated excitation 
L$mixed for monopole and dipole resonances 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$isoscalar giant dipole resonance (2014Va07,2015Va13) from (|a,|a') 
L$mixed for monopole and dipole resonances 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance (ISGQR) from (|a,|a'), 15.4 MeV {I16} from (d,d') (2014Va07,2015Va13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) from (|a,|a'), and 20.8 MeV {I6} from (d,d') is fragmented with centroid at 21.1 MeV {I19} (2014Va07,2015Va13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$the same level is quoted at 1770 keV {I30} in {+68}Ni Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 
T$from delayed time difference plot between two coincident events recorded within 2 |ms from two plastic scintillators, one from |b rays and the other from delayed electrons from E0 transition or electrons (or positrons) from pair conversion of E0 transition (2015Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$measured by 2015Wi02 from time difference between implantation of {+68}Ni ions and decay, gated on decays with 815|g from the isomeric state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=301 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I38} from values of 292 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I35} by DWEIKO and 312 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I40} by ECIS (2021Ca22). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average from 11.2 s {I9} (2001Fr21,1998Fr15) and 11.4 s {I3} (1985Bo49). Other: 10 s {I3} (1985Ru05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%IT$from RUL, B(M4)(W.u.)<30 
T$ weighted average of 3.5 s {I5} (1999Mu17) and 3.4 s {I7} (1999Pr10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$ weighted average of 3.5 s {I5} (1999Mu17) and 3.4 s {I7} (1999Pr10) 
J$Configuration |np{-1/2}{+-1}|ng{-9/2}{{+2}}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
E$Suggested as an isomer by authors (1998Gr14). Supported by similar isomers identified in valence partner {+91}Nb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from 1998Gr14 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 766), and assumed uncertainty of 1 keV in gamma-ray energies connected with this isomer 
$Configuration=|np{-1/2}{+-1} (2015Li33) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$Coulomb excitation from 0+ ground state. 
BE2$from Coulomb excitation; relative to B(E2)=0.268 {I8} for the first 2+ state of {+76}Ge. 
T$deduced by evaluators from B(E2) and adopted |g-ray properties 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from |b|g(t) in {+70}Co |b{+-} decay (0.47 s). 
J$from non-observation in multinucleon transfer reactions and absence of 1567|g in |b-delayed, |g-ray spectrum. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in Ni({+86}Kr,X|g),{+9}Be({+76}Ge,X|g) 
J$E2 183|g to 6+ 
$configuration=(|ng{-9/2}){++2} (1998Gr14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$relative to B(E2)=0.268 {I8} for the first 2+ state of {+76}Ge. 
T$deduced by evaluators from B(E2) and adopted |g-ray properties 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) using sum of 183|g, 448|g, 970|g and 1259|g (1999Le68). Others: 0.21 |ms {I5} (1998Gr14), 0.200 |ms (1997Pf03). 
J$configuration=(|ng{-9/2}){++2} (1998Gr14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$(4+) proposed in 2015Ch25 based on the decay pattern and absence of any observed |b-feeding to this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$level proposed by 2015Ch25 based on unplaced 1256.8|g from {+70}Co |b{+-} decay (0.47 s) (2000Mu10). 
J$(0+,2+) proposed by 2015Ch25 based on population of only low-spin (J|<4) states in this reaction, unlikely presence of J=1 or 3 states based on shell model considerations and absence of any observed |b feeding to J=4+ levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+60}Ni,{+70}Ni)=0.806 fm{+2} {I24}. Total charge radius R{-c}=3.910 fm {I3} (2022Ma04) 
$isotope shift |d|n({+60}Ni,{+70}Ni)=2377.2 MHz {I49}(stat) {I181}(syst) (2022Ma04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 2.49 s {I18} (2021Pe08, implants-|b-correlated decay curve, followed for 12 s; 2.56 s {I3} (2001Fr21,1998Fr15, |b-|g-correlated decay curve). Other: 1.86 s {I35} (1990Be13, |b-fragments-correlated decay curve; T{-1/2} seems discrepant) 
$Configuration=|ng{-9/2}~#({+70}Ni g.s.) 
$1998FrZY is superseded by 1998Fr15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$isomer identified by 2009St07 in {+71}Co |b{+-} decay; T{-1/2} measured from decay curve for 454|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$ordering of the 252-813 |g cascade is interchangeable, thus the level is either at 813 or 252 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from 1065.4 {I6} - 566.9 {I2}. Other: 499 (2012Ra10,2009St07) 
T$isomer identified by 2009St07, T{-1/2} measured from decay curve for 454|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$from 2012Ra10 
$A possible 532|g from this level to 281 level was not observed either due to large hindrance factor for M1 transition in competition with E2 transition or that it is obscured by a strong 534-keV |g ray from {+71}Ni decay to {+71}Cu 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5,6)
level_comment:
$2016Mo07 point out that no additional |g rays were observed feeding or deexciting the 3509 level, and that the level was defined only on the basis of the relative intensities of the 77- and 1571-keV transitions. However, compiler notes that relative intensity of the 77-keV transition is not given in authors' Table II. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$From 2018Co06 based on systematics known in the lighter Ni isotopes. The assignment is tentative 
$|s(p,p')=0.3 mb {I1}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=1.099 s, %|b{+-}n=1 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=12 s, %|b{+-}n=0.5 (2016Ma12). 
T$from decay curve for |b gated |g spectra (2001Fr21). Others: 0.6 s {I1} (1998Am04), 0.90 s {I15} (1990Be13) 
J$tentative assignment (2001Fr21); possible g{-9/2} orbital. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$If 992|g is the only transition from this level, then measured B(E2)|_ gives level T{-1/2}=2.5 ps {I+|@-13} or >1.2 ps (compiler) 
$Measured excitation |s=18 mb {I+20-18} (2020Go06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Measured excitation |s=38 mb {I15} (2020Go06) 
$If 1115|g is the only transition from this level, then measured B(E2)|_ gives level T{-1/2}=1.5 ps {I+12-4} (compiler) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 2021Pe08 using the |t correlation method where each |b is correlated to the preceding implant within 20 s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=1.2 s, %|b{+-}n=2.3 (2003Mo09). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=5.5 s, %|b{+-}n=1.0 (2016Ma12). 
T$from |b(implant) correlations (2014Xu07, see detailed analysis of the decay curve on Figs. A.66, 67, 68 and Tables A.39, 40, pages 191-193 of 2014XuZZ thesis). Others: 0.9 s {I2} (1998Fr15,2001Fr21); 0.54 s {I16} (1998Am04); 1.1 s {I5} (1990Be13). Weighted average of all the four values is 508.0 ms {I61}, however, the most precise value from 2014Xu07 is preferred. 
T$theory (T{-1/2} and/or %|b-n): 2005Ni02, 2005Bo19, 1989Kr02, 1997Mo25 
$In |b|g and |g|g studies of {+74}Ni decay, 1998Fr15 reported two most intense |g rays at 166.1 {I1} and 694.3 {I2}, forming a cascade. These |g rays feed levels either in {+74}Cu through |b{+-} decay or in {+73}Cu through |b{+-}n decay. The latter possibility, however, seems less likely (1998Fr15) since the |g-ray intensities imply %|b{+-}n=30, much higher than the theoretical value of 2.3% (2003Mo09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$From Adopted Levels 
$|s(p,p')=14 mb {I4}. The quoted uncertainty contains statistical (20%) and systematic components. The cross section was obtained with and without considering feeding by 786|g, and also assuming 25% {I5} contribution from an expected, but unobserved, 3- state at 2-3 MeV. 
$Deduced |b{-2}=0.21 {I3} from deformation length |d(p,p')=1.04 fm {I16} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2) deduced by 2014Ma85 from measured angle-integrated cross section for 0+ to 2+ excitation=148 mb {I+50-52}, and using DWEIKO computer code to translate this cross section into B(E2) value. 2014Ma85 quote B(E2) in e{+2}fm{+4} units, whereas here it is listed in e{+2}b{+2} units as in ENSDF database 
T$deduced by evaluator from B(E2) value in 2014Ma85 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$From 2018Co06 based on similarities with {+72}Ni. The assignment is tentative 
$|s(p,p')=0.9 mb {I5}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$From 2018Co06 based on systematics known in the lighter Ni isotopes. The assignment is tentative 
$|s(p,p')=0.6 mb {I2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Authors compared their B(E2) value with 0.0642 {I220} measured by 2014Ma85: Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 182501 in Coulomb excitation 
T$deduced by compiler from measured B(E2) 
$Measured excitation |s=118 mb {I19} (2020Go06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+75}Ni) in Si detectors (2010Ho12). The authors used method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved. Others: 344 ms {i+20-24} (2005Ho08, previous result from 2010Ho12), 0.6 s {i2} (1998Am04). 
J$7/2+ proposed from systematics (2012Au07) and theory (1997Mo25). Shell-model calculations quoted in 2005Gr29 (also 2010RaZY) support 9/2+ for {+69,71,73,75}Ni isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from |b|g-coin decay curve (2014Xu07). Other: 344 ms {I25} in {+75}Ni Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$If 950|g is the only transition from this level, then measured B(E2)|_ gives level T{-1/2}=3.6 ps {I+72-14} (compiler) 
$Measured excitation |s=29 mb {I20} (2020Go06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$A total of 1441 implants were detected, and 43 correlated |bn coincidences were observed (2010Ho12) 
T$weighted average of 234.6 ms {I27} (2014Xu07, from |b|g-coin decay curve) and 238 ms {I18} (2010Ho12,2005Ho08, from measurement of time sequence of decay events correlated with the implanted {+76}Ni nuclei in Si detectors; maximum likelihood analysis with input parameters of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei, and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved). Other: 0.24 s {I+55-19} (1998Am04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Configuration=|ng{-9/2}{+2} (2004Sa13) 
T$from |g(t) method, weighted average of values from the four transitions (2015So23). Previous (less precise) measurements: 636 ns {I90} (2014Ra20), 409 ns {I+58-50} (2012Ka36); 0.59 |ms {I+18-11} (2005Ma59); 0.24 |ms {I8} (2004Sa13). Weighted average of all the above values, except the seemingly discrepant result from 2004Sa13, is 547.4 ns {I52}, in agreement with the result taken from 2015So23 only. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) method, weighted average of values from the four transitions (2015So23). Previous (less precise) measurements: 636 ns {I90} (2014Ra20), 409 ns {I+58-50} (2012Ka36); 0.59 |ms {I+18-11} (2005Ma59); 0.24 |ms {I8} (2004Sa13). Weighted average of all the above values, except the seemingly discrepant result from 2004Sa13, is 547.4 ns {I52}, in agreement with the result taken from 2015So23 only. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$Configuration=|ng{-9/2}{+2} (2004Sa13) 
E$2418.2 {I5} in the Adopted Levels 
T$from |g(t) method, weighted average of values from the four transitions (2015So23). Previous (less precise) measurements: 636 ns {I90} (2014Ra20), 409 ns {I+58-50} (2012Ka36); 0.59 |ms {I+18-11} (2005Ma59); 0.24 |ms {I8} (2004Sa13). Weighted average of above values, except seemingly discrepant result from 2004Sa13, is 547.4 ns {I52} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode has been observed in 2014Xu07 and 2010Ho12, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. Beta-delayed one-neutron decay mode has also been detected by 2010Ho12 
$%|b{+-}n: weighted average of 30 {I24} (2010Ho12, |b{+-}n-correlated events with ion implants); and 24 {I16} (2014XuZZ, |b|g-implant analysis) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=257.7 ms, %|b{+-}n=23, %|b{+-}2n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=770 ms, %|b{+-}n=48.6, %|b{+-}2n=0.3 (2016Ma12). 
$The observed activity is assumed to correspond to the g.s. of {+77}Ni 
J$From systematics, dominated by an odd neutron hole in the 1g{-9/2} orbital in the shell-model calculations (2017Sa32). Also 9/2+ from systematic trend in 2017Au03, and from |W{-n}=9/2+ (theory, 2019Mo01) 
T$from 2014Xu07 (|b|g-coin decay curve). Other: 128 ms {I+36-32} (2010Ho12) (|b-implants decay curve; earlier value of 128 ms {I+27-33} in 2005Ho08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode detected. Calculated (1997Mo25) %|b{+-}n=49 
T$from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+78}Ni) in Si detectors (2005Ho08, 2007Sc29). The authors used method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ A total of 13 implants were detected, and 3 correlated |bn coincidences were observed 
T$ from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+78}Ni) in Si detectors (2010Ho12) The authors used method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved . In previous publication T{-1/2}=100 ms {I+100-60} (2005Ho08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from |b|g-coin decay curve (2014Xu07). Other: 0.11 s {I+10-6} in {+78}Ni Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode has been observed in 2014Xu07. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=37.6 ms, %|b{+-}n=62.1, %|b{+-}2n=4.8 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=84.9 ms, %|b{+-}n=21.2, %|b{+-}2n=1.3 (2016Ma12) 
E$the observed activity is assumed to be in its ground state 
J$1/2+ in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$from 2014Xu07, decay curve of time difference between implantations and correlated |b decays using maximum likelihood (MLH) method and including half-lives of parent, daughter, and grand-daughter nuclei together with |b-delayed neutron emission channels. 
$Since no events were observed for neighboring hydrogen-like peaks, the misidentification of {+79}Ni in 2010Oh02 is not likely 
$ Measured |s=5 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?50% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode has been observed in 2014Xu07. Theoretical %|b{+-}n=44.3, %|b{+-}2n=12.7 (1997Mo25) 
T$from 2014Xu07; measured from decay curve of time difference between implantations and correlated |b decays using maximum likelihood (MLH) method and including half-lives of parent, daughter, and grand-daughter nuclei together with |b-delayed neutron emission channels Theoretical T{-1/2}=182 ms (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1 count assigned to {+81}Ni by 2017Su15, which is assumed by the evaluator to correspond to the g.s. activity of {+81}Ni 
$Measured production |s=5|*10{+-12} mb {I+11-4} (2017Su15) 
$|b{+-} decay mode assumed by the evaluator. 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=34, %|b{+-}2n=53 (2019Mo01) 
J$ 3/2+ from systematics (2021Ko07), 1/2+ in theoretical calculations (2019Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$1 count assigned to {+82}Ni by 2017Su15, which is assumed to correspond to the g.s. activity of {+82}Ni 
$Measured production |s=6|*10{+-12} mb {I+14-5} (2017Su15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$ from 2013Bl04, based on re-analysis of data in 2005Bl15 and flight time of 1.3 |ms 
J$ 3/2- from syst (2012Au07); 1/2- in 1997Mo25 theoretical predictions. 
$ No experimental events due to {+53}Cu were observed. Estimated production |s=1|*10{+-10} b in Ni({+58}Ni,X),E=74.5 MeV/nucleon, which is consistent with non-observation of events related to {+53}Cu nuclide. If this nuclide were bound, 2013Bl04 estimate that about 1250 events should have been detected in the above reaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from 1994Bl10(non-observation). 
J$Estimated from trends in neighboring nuclides with the same Z and n parities (2012Au07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$S(p)({+55}Ni)=4615 keV, thus no delayed protons can be emitted from the IAS doublet identified at 4579+4599. 2013Tr09 state that no protons were detected indicating that delayed proton branch is small. 2007Do17 reported a |b{++}-delayed proton branch of 15.0% {I43}, which appears questionable in view of non-confirmation by 2013Tr09. 
J$from shell-model calculations using KB3G56-ISB interaction (2021Ru09). Same J|p is proposed by 2013Tr09, with T{-z}=-3/2. Others: 3/2- (syst, 2021Ko07), |W{p}=1/2- (theory, 2019Mo01) 
T$weighted average of 57 ms {I3} (2013Tr09, from (implant)|b correlated decay curve fitted for parent decay, growth and decay of daughter nuclide {+55}Ni and background); and 55.5 ms {I18} (2020Gi02, from implants-decay correlated events, same T{-1/2} in 2017GoZT). Other: 27 ms {I8} (2007Do17, from |b{++}-delayed proton decay curve) appears questionable since 2013Tr09 did not observe any proton decay branch from {+55}Cu decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1 
J$analogy to g.s., 4+ in {+56}Co mirror nucleus 
T$from 2001Bo54. Others: 78 ms {I15} (1998Ra15), 82 ms {I9} (2002Bl17,2002Lo13). 
T$NRM weighted average of 80.2 ms {I7} (2020Gi02,2017GoZT, correlated implants-decay events at RIBF-RIKEN); 80 ms {I2} (2017Ku12, {+56}Cu implants)|b correlated decays at GANIL); 82 ms {I9} (2002Lo13,2002Bl17, correlated implants-decays at GANIL); 93 ms {I3} (2001Bo54, |g-decay curves at GSI); 78 ms {I15} (1998Ra15, |b|g-coin decay curve at GSI). In NRM weighted average, uncertainty in 2001Bo54 gets inflated to 5.4 ms from the stated uncertainty of 3 ms. Weighted average is 80.8 ms {I13}, but reduced |h{+2}=4.4 is larger that the critical |h{+2}=2.4 at 95% confidence level. Unweighted average is 82.6 ms {I27} 
$Total number of {+56}Cu implanted ions=1.77|*10{+5} in Ni({+64}Zn,X), E=79 MeV/nucleon (2017Ku12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=LT;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$excitation energy below the proton-decay threshold. This peak may have components of g.s and levels up to 1037, (2+) level 
J$L=2 in {+56}Ni(p,n) inverse reaction suggests positive parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$probable doublet, both with J|p=1+ 
J$log| {Ift}=3.8 {I1} from 0+ parent state; analogy to 3432,1+ and 3496,1+ levels in {+56}Co mirror nucleus, as reported in 2013Fu15 in ({+3}He,t). In {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database, corresponding two levels are 3436, 0+,1+ and 3510, (0+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1 
J$log| {Ift}=3.44 {I11}, superallowed |b decay from 0+ parent state; isobaric analog state (IAS) of g.s. in {+56}Zn. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$two peaks at 2.8 and 4.8 MeV are visible in this energy range from Fig. 2e in 2011Sa52. Part of this structure may contain 3446, 1+ level 
J$from L=0, Gamow-Teller transition in {+56}Ni(p,n) inverse reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
$E(p)=831 {I10}, I(p)=3.0 {I4} 
E$this level corresponds to 1450.7, 0+ in {+56}Co mirror nucleus; level from {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$Estimated %|g=66 {I22} from this level (2014Or04), which probably accounts for 11.5% {I26} missing branching ratio 
$E(p)=1131 {I10}, I(p)=23.8 {I11} 
E$this level correspondence to 1720.2, 1+ in {+56}Co mirror nucleus; level from {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
$E(p)=1977 {I10}, I(p)=4.6 {I8} 
E$this level may correspond to 2635.6, 1+ in {+56}Co mirror nucleus; level from {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database and also from 2013Fu15 in ({+3}He,t), although the energy difference of 76 keV {I12} seems somewhat large 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$E(p)=2101 {I10}, I(p)=17.1 {I9} 
E$this level corresponds to 2729.9, 1+ in {+56}Co mirror nucleus, level from {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database and also from 2013Fu15 in ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$E(p)=2863 {I10}, I(p)=21.2 {I10} 
E$this peak is broader in the spectrum than the other peaks. 2014Or04 suggest that this group corresponds to three states at 3432,1+, and 3496,1+ seen by 2013Fu15 in the mirror nucleus {+56}Co. In {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database, corresponding two levels are 3436, 0+,1+ and 3510, (0+). 2014Or04 included 3527,0+ level in {+56}Co also in this group, but this level is now considered to correspond to the 3531 level in {+56}Cu. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1 
$Estimated %|g=56 {I6} from this level (2014Or04), but only 45% is accounted for by 861.2 and 1834.5 |g rays; remaining 11% (|?5 units of absolute photon intensity) must be associated with unobserved gamma-rays from 3510 level 
$E(p)=2948 {I10}, I(p)=18.8% {I10} 
E$Isobaric Analogue State (IAS). This level corresponds to 3527, 0+ in {+56}Co mirror nuclide; level from 2013Fu15 in ({+3}He,t) and also in {+56}Co Adopted Levels in ENSDF database). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$|s(>)=3.2 mb/sr {I5} (2011Sa52) 
E$two peaks at 2.8 and 4.8 MeV are visible in this energy range from Fig. 2e in 2011Sa52 
J$from 2011Sa52, L=0, Gamow-Teller transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Events associated with {+54}Co (from 2p decay of {+56}Cu) are also present in this region above |?10 MeV excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$ super-allowed decay to J|p=3/2-, T{-z}=+1/2, g.s. of {+57}Ni (1984Sh28) 
T from 1996Se01. Others: 199.4 ms {i32} (1987HaZN), 223 ms {i16} (1984Sh28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2- : 9/2-)
level_comment:
E from adopted levels 
J,ISPIN if 2.58-MeV proton decay is isospin allowed and |b{++}-decay to state is allowed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E calculated by evaluator based on the s(p)({+57}Cu)=695 keV {i18} 
J,ISPIN syst. E(level) agrees well with the {+57}Ni analog. 
POSSIBLE DECAY TO 56NI(G.S.), E(P)=4.65 MEV 5, AND 56NI(2702), E(P)=1.95 MEV 5. PROTON ENERGY DIFFERENCE=2.70 MEV 7 AGREES WELL WITH ENERGY OF FIRST-EXCITED STATE IN 56NI (2700.6 7; 1987Hu04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$ value is measured relative to the magnetic dipole moment of +2.2273602 {I13} for g.s. of {+63}Cu 
J$ 3/2 consistent with observed hyperfine structure 
$ Isotope shift ({+57}Cu-{+63}Cu)=3.449 GHz {I20} (2010Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1/2 
$J|p from {+57}Cu Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (Sep 1998 update). 
T$measured by 2017Ku12 from ({+57}Cu implants)|b correlated decay curve. Others: 183 ms {I17} in 2002Lo13 (Phys. Rev. C66, 025803; from GANIL); 196.3 ms {I7} in 1996Se01 (Phys. Rev. C53, 96); 199.4 ms {I32} in 1987HaZN (Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclei Far from Stability, Rosseau Lake, J11, also T. Shinozuka et al., Proc. Conf. Osaka, p108 (1989)); 223 ms {I16} in 1984Sh28 (Phys. Rev. C30, 2111(R)). Value of 196.3 ms {I7} from 1996Se01 is listed in {+57}Cu Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 
$Total number of {+57}Cu implanted ions=5.49|*10{+5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$Angle-integrated |s{-exp}=2.00 mb {I40} 
$|G{-p}=5.7|*10{+-12} eV, |G{-|g}=1.9|*10{+-4} 
$Calculated C{-2}S{-Sm}=0.75 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$Angle-integrated |s{-exp}=0.28 mb {I6} 
$|G{-p}=1.9|*10{+-7} eV, |G{-|g}=8.6|*10{+-3} 
$Calculated C{-2}S{-Sm}=0.71 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$Angle-integrated |s{-exp}<0.2 mb 
$|G{-p}=5.5|*10{+-3} eV from shell-model calculations, |G{-|g}=9.0|*10{+-3} 
$Calculated C{-2}S{-Sm}=0.0018 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$Angle-integrated |s{-exp}<0.2 mb 
$|G{-p}=5.3|*10{+-1} eV from measured C{+2}S of analog state in {+57}Ni also by 2019Ka44, |G{-|g}=6.8|*10{+-3} 
$Calculated C{-2}S{-Sm}=0.039 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ Isotope shift({+58}Cu,{+63}Cu)=3.14 GHz {I18} (2010Co01) 
$ Isotope shift({+58}Cu,{+65}Cu)=1.99 GHz {I30} (2008St12) 
$ 2010Co01: Cocolios et al, Phys Rev C (accepted Jan 11, 2010; pre-publication copy received from the authors Jan 12, 2010) 
MOMM1$ 2010Co01: from in-gas-cell laser hyperfine spectroscopy at LISOL facility, where radioactive source was produced in (p,n) reaction on {+58}Ni target at CRC in Louvain-La-Neuve. The measurements were made with reference to magnetic moment of {+63}Cu. The authors also measured isotope shifts. 2008St12: from in-source laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE, CERN using Zr(p,X) reaction at 1.4 GeV. The isotope shift relative to {+65}Cu was also measured 
J$ log| {Ift}=4.9 to 0+; L({+3}He,t)=0+2. Hyperfine structure measurements of 2010Co01 rule out 0+, and are consistent with 1+. 
$ From comparison of measured magnetic-dipole moment with calculated values from shell-model using GXPF1 interaction, proposed dominant configuration=|pp{-3/2}~#|np{-3/2} (2010Co01) 
T$ from 1965Fr06 (also 1965Fr03). Others: 3.0 s {I7} (1973Di17), 3.2 s {I2} (1969Jo24), 3.21 s {I2} (1962Mi13), 3.30 s {I10} (1958Ge33), 3 s (1954Ty33), 3.04 s (1952Ma55) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ From |g(t)-radio frequency method in (p,n|g) 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 1+; also L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2 and L({+3}He,t)=(2+4) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
%P$ from author's estimation of %|g<3 in 1998Ru01 and conservative lower limit of 93% in 2002Ru09 
%P$ Main decay is through prompt proton transition of angular momentum 3 to 5 and E(p)(c.m. system)=2290 {I20} (2002Ru09) to 3701, 9/2+ level in {+57}Ni. Weak proton transition to 3864, 11/2- level in {+57}Ni is not confirmed by 2002Ru09. 
$A 2330|g from this level proposed earlier is not confirmed by 2002Ru09. 
$Proton decay is identified from the observation of following |g transitions in {+57}Ni in coincidence experiments: 769 (from 769 level), 2577 (from 2577 level), 1124 and 2932 (from 3701 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$analog of 9071 level in {+58}Ni. Wide structure at 9200 {I400} in (p,n) with |G|?1.3 MeV. Other levels may be involved in this peak. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$analog of 11003 level in {+58}Ni. Wide structure at 11200 {I400} in (p,n) with |G|?0.7 MeV. Other levels may be involved in this peak 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$analog of 12738 level in {+58}Ni. Wide structure at 13000 {I400} in (p,n) with |G|?0.5 MeV. Other levels may be involved in this peak. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
%P$ from author's estimation of %|g<3 in 1998Ru01 and conservative lower limit of 93% in 2002Ru09 
T$0.042-0.40 ps (2001Ru11) 
J$ from 2001Ru02 
$ Main decay is through prompt proton transition of angular momentum 3 to 5 and E(p)(c.m. system)=2290 {I20} (2002Ru09) to 3701, 9/2+ level in {+57}Ni. Weak proton transition to 3864, 11/2- level in {+57}Ni is not confirmed by 2002Ru09. 
$A 2330|g from this level proposed earlier is not confirmed by 2002Ru09. 
$Proton decay is identified from the observation of following |g transitions in {+57}Ni in coincidence experiments: 769 (from 769 level), 2577 (from 2577 level), 1124 and 2932 (from 3701 level). DCO(1124|g)=0.47 {I13} (2001Ru02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ from 2001Ru02 
Q(transition)=2.75 {I+27-24} (2001Ru02) 
$ Weak (|?8%) proton decay from this level, originally proposed, is not confirmed by 2002Ru09. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=1.65 {I25} 
E$ isobar analog state of {+58}Ni g.s. 
E$ 200 (1983Ra30), 197 4 (1969Ki10), 200 (1968Is01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=4.2 {I6} 
E$ 10.6 (strong) and 12.0 MeV (weak) groups in spectral figure 2 of 2008An15 
$B(>)=1.58 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$J|>2 from |g(|q)(1972St26) 
T$from 2005Co22, delayed |g-radio frequency coin method. Corresponding B(E2) value is consistent with 3+ state as a collective quadrupole excitation of the 1+ g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$ Fermi |b strength function=2 (2007Ze06) 
E$ analog of g.s. of {+58}Ni 
E$ 200 10 (1973Ru03), 202 15 (1972Be38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$analog of 9526 level in {+58}Ni. Note that negative parity (E1 excitation is also assigned to {+58}Ni parent level in (|g,|g') work (2000Ba63). Thus 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$analog of 9843 level in {+58}Ni. A corresponding state reported in {+58}Ni(e,e') (1987Me16) with T=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$analog of 10157 level in {+58}Ni. A corresponding state reported in {+58}Ni(e,e') (1987Me16) with T=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu, {+59}Cu)=-0.635 fm{+2} {I9} (stat) {I71} (syst). (2016Bi08). 
J L=1 in ({+3}He,d), (|a,t), (d,n); log| {Ift}=5.8 to 5/2- 339 level in {+59}Cu |e decay. 
T from 1958Bu07 ({+59}Cu |e decay). Others: 1955Li38 (82 s {I1}), 1955Yu04 (83 s {I1}), 1956Pr12 (83 s {I1}), 1939De01 (81 s {I2}) - all from ({+59}Cu |e decay). 
MOMM1 From CLS (2011Vi03, 2014StZZ). Other values: +1.910 {I4} (2010Co01), +1.891 {I9} (2004Go39), +1.84 {I3} (2008St12). 
MOME2 From CLS and reevaluation (2013StZZ, 2014StZZ). Other: -0.19 {I2} (2011Vi03, 2014StZZ - cls). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E Excited level at 2710 {I7} with L({+3}He,d)=3 could correspond to either 2706 or 2715 level, as could L=3 levels at 2690 in (|a,t) and at 2693 in (d,n). 
J J Ne 3/2 or 7/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); Q |g to 1/2-; D(+Q) |g to 5/2-. L=3 in ({+3}He,d) and (|a,t) for 2706 and/or 2715 level(s). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E a level at 2710 {I7} with L({+3}He,d)=3 could correspond to either 2706 or 2715 level, as could L=3 levels at 2690 in (|a,t) and at 2693 in (d,n). 
J 7/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); Q |g to 3/2-; mixed D+Q |g to 5/2- and 7/2-. L=3 in ({+3}He,d) and (|a,t) for 2706 and/or 2715 level(s). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$From ({+3}He,d|g) 
J 3/2 from W(90|')/W(147|') in ({+3}He,d|g); L(d,n)=1. L({+3}He,d)=1 for 3729 and/or 3742 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E From ({+3}He,d|g). Fragment of {+59}Ni(g.s.) IAS. 
J L({+3}He,d)=1; 3/2 from W(90|')/W(147|') in ({+3}He,d|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(-)
level_comment:
E From ({+3}He,d|g). Possible {+59}Ni(5/2-, 339 level) analogue fragment, but E is high cf. systematics. 
J not 7/2, from W(90|')/W(147|') in ({+3}He,d|g); 5/2,7/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g). |p=- if analogue state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2(-)
level_comment:
J J=5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g). L({+3}He,d)=3 for 4301 and/or 4307 level(s). |p=- if analogue state. 
E Possible fragment of {+59}Ni(5/2-, 339 level) analogue, but E is high cf. systematics. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_comment:
E From ({+3}He,d|g). Possible 1/2- {+59}Ni(465 level) analogue. 
J (1/2) from d-p angular correlation in ({+3}He,dp); L({+3}He,d)=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$From {+59}Zn |e decay 
J L({+3}He,d)=1; J=(1/2) from angular correlation in ({+3}He,dp). 
T from (p,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$Unweighted ave. of data from (p,|g), {+59}Zn |e decay, and ({+3}He,d), ({+3}He,dp). 
T from (p,|g). 
J L({+3}He,d)=1. 
E Fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(878 level) analogue. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$From {+59}Zn |e decay 
J 3/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); L({+3}He,d)=1. 
Analogue of 3/2- {+59}Ni(878 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Probable analogue of 5/2- {+59}Ni(1189 level). 
J 3/2,5/2 from branching statistics in (p,|g); L({+3}He,d)=3. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Analogue of 1/2- {+59}Ni(1301 level). 
J L=1 in ({+3}He,d); J=1/2 from (d,np) correlation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g) 
J 3/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); |e decay from 3/2- {+59}Zn is allowed (log| {Ift}=5.5 {I1}); L({+3}He,d)=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g) 
J log| {Ift}<5.9 from 3/2- in {+59}Zn |e decay; D+Q |g to 1/2-, |g to 7/2-; probable 3/2- {+59}Ni(1735 level) analogue. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g) 
J 5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); |e decay from 3/2- {+59}Zn is allowed (log| {Ift}=5.7 {I2}). L({+3}He,d)=3 for 5712 level and/or 5719 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2,5/2(-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E From ({+3}He,pn|g) 
J 3/2,5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); |g to 1/2-. L({+3}He,d)=3 for 5712 level and/or 5719 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2(-)
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Analogue of 7/2- {+59}Ni(1948 level). 
J 7/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); proposed analogue has |p=-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of {+59}Ni(2415 level) if |p=-. 
J (3/2) from (p,|g); |g to 7/2(-). J|p=(3/2+,5/2+) in (p,p),(p,p'|g) for 6197 and/or 6201 level(s). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2,5/2
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(2415 level) analogue if |p=-. 
J From (p,|g); |g to 1/2-. J|p=(3/2+,5/2+) from (p,p),(p,p'|g) for 6197 and/or 6201 level(s). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible 3/2- {+59}Ni(2415 level) analogue fragment. 
J 3/2,5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); L({+3}He,d)=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J 5/2 in (p,|g), |g to 1/2-. Inconsistent with J|p=5/2+ in (p,p),(p,p'|g) from R-matrix resonance parameters for |s(E(p),|q). 
T see comment on J|p. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E From (p,p),(p,p'|g) - same excitation energy for two levels with 1/2- and 3/2- assignments. 1/2- state present both in primary and secondary - however total widths have significant difference. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_comment:
E From (p,p),(p,p'|g). Possible fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(2894 level) analogue. 
J 3/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); |g to 7/2(-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
E In (p,p),(p,p'|g) another 1/2- state at 6707.8 {i20} listed from a secondary reference, absent in primary reference 1976Ar01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(2894 level) analogue. 
J 3/2,5/2 from (p,|g); |g to 7/2(-); |g to 1/2-. May be same level as a (1/2-,3/2-) level at 6724.2 {I20} in (p,p),(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E Two closeby level energies, 7647.2 {i20} and 7648.9 {i30} in (p,p),(p,p'|g) with same 1/2+ assignment, evaluator assume same state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of 9/2+ {+59}Ni(3054 level) analogue. 
J 9/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); L({+3}He,d)=4. 
(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=1.1 eV {I1} (1976Ar01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
J 3/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g). 
Differs from (1/2)-, 6841.1 {I24} level in (p,p),(p,p'|g) provided J from (p,p),(p,p'|g) is correct. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E from (p,|g). Note another comparable resonance level energy, 6879.9 {i20} with 1/2+ assignment from secondary reference.  
J Also 5/2 in (p,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of 9/2+ {+59}Ni(3054 level) analogue. 
J L(|a,t)=4; D |g 7/2(-) and 11/2(-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_comment:
E,J Possible analogue of 3132 or 3182 level of {+59}Ni. D+Q |g to 1/2- and 5/2-. Presumed to be different level from 1/2- levels at 6938.5 {I20} and 6943.4 {I20} in (p,p),(p,p'|g); however, J from (p,p),(p,p'|g) may not be reliable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of 3/2 {+59}Ni(3182 level) analogue. 
J L({+3}He,d)=1. This level presumed to differ from 3/2+, 6946.1 {I20} level in (p,p),(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
J from 1994Ho31 in (p,|g), presumably based on 6959|g(|q); possible fragment of {+59}Ni(3182 level) analogue (J=3/2) (1994Ho31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Possible fragment of 3/2 {+59}Ni(3182 level) analogue. Probably same as (1/2,3/2)- level or (3/2,5/2)+ level at 6967.4 {I22} and 6964.9 {I22}, respectively, in (p,p),(p,p'|g). 
J |g to 3/2- and 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
E From (p,|g) 
J L(d,n)=2 for possible doublet; probably the same level as the 7139.6 {I20} (5/2+) level in (p,p),(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
J D(+Q) gammas to 1/2- and 5/2-. 1994Ho31 suggest that this is analogue of the {+59}Ni(3354 level) (J|p unknown). L=2 in ({+3}He,d), ({+3}He,dp). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,3/2-)
level_comment:
J D |g to 3/2-; |g to 7/2-. 4586|g to (9/2-) favors 5/2, 1994Ho31, in (p,|g), suggest that this is analogue of a 3389-keV {+59}Ni level, but the evaluator is uncertain which of the adopted levels corresponds to that state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
E Possible fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(3452 level) analogue. 
J 3/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); need |p=- for analogue. |p=+ for 3 nearby levels in (p,p),(p,p'|g), but (p,|g) and (p,p),(p,p'|g) may excite different states. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
E Possible fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(3452 level) analogue. 
J D+Q |g to 3/2-, |g to 5/2-; |p=- favored from |d(7347|g). 
Presumed to differ from 5/2-, 7349.5 {I22} and 1/2-, 7349.9 {I22} levels in (p,p),(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Note a comparable level at 7392.6 {i20} in (p,p),(p,p'|g) may be the same level - but with 3/2-. 
J 5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g); L({+3}He,d)=2. Possible analogue of 5/2(+) {+59}Ni(3540 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E From (p,|g) 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J L({+3}He,d)=2 for 7447 {I9} level. 
Probably same level as 3/2+, 7438.4 {I22} level in (p,p),(p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). May be same level as 3/2+, 7470.1 {I20} and/or 3/2-, 7473.4 {I20} level from (p,p),(p,p'|g). 
$Other |G=40 ev {i11} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Probably comprised of two or more of 7496.2 {I20} (1/2+), 7502.6 {I20} (3/2-) and 7506.4 {I20} (5/2+) levels from (p,p),(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
E Suggested 5/2+ {+59}Ni(4506 level) analogue fragment (from ({+3}He,d)), but E is low cf. systematics. 
J L({+3}He,d)=2; (5/2) from d-p angular correlation in ({+3}He,dp). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
E From (p,|g). Suggested 5/2+ {+59}Ni(4506 level) analogue fragment (from ({+3}He,d)), but E is low cf. systematics. 
J L({+3}He,d)=2; (5/2) from d-p angular correlation in ({+3}He,dp). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E,T from (|p{++},|p{+-}). For gdr~#ias resonance; not a discrete level. See source dataset for parameters for T{-<} and T{->} components of resonance. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E from 1975Co21. Others: 914 (1985Di05), 912 {I1} (1975Kl06). 
J J=5/2 from |g(|q) (1980Ho31). This result and adopted |p=- assumed by 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_comment:
E from 1975Co21. Others: 1399 (1985Di05), 1399 {I1} (1975Kl06). 
J from |g(|q) (1975Tr05); this result and adopted |p=- assumed by 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_comment:
E from 1975Co21. Others: 1865 (1985Di05), 1865 {I1} (1975Kl06). 
J=7/2 from |g(|q) (1975Tr05); 7/2- assumed by 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
J |g(|q) allows J=3/2 but not 1/2 or 5/2 (1975Tr05); fed from J=1/2 resonance. This J and adopted |p=+ assumed by 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J 5/2,7/2 from |g(|q) (1975Tr05), when 1975Tr05 report two closeby levels at 3022 and 3025, later of spin-parity 3/2-. However 1985Di05 report only one level at 3024. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
g{-9/2} antianalogue state. 
E from 1975Co21. Others: 3042 (1985Di05), 3042 {I1} (1975Kl06). 
J from |g(|q), 1975Co21 and 1982Sz01. This J and adopted |p=+ assumed by 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J 5/2+ assumed by 1985Di05; however, level may differ from adopted 3580 level to which this J|p is assigned. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=947 {I2} 
E From Ep and Sp. Analogue of 1/2- {+59}Ni(465 level). 
S from 1957Bu64; 949 {I4} in 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1100 {I2} 
E From 1985Di05. 4499.8 {I20} from E(p) and S(p). 
T from (2J+1)|G{-|g}|G{-p0}/|G=0.0252 eV {I16} (1980Co02), assuming |G{-p0}/|G=0.31 {I3} from ({+3}He,d), |G=|G{-p0}+|G{-|g} and J=1/2. 
S from 1957Bu64; 1098 {I4} in 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1376 {I1} 
Fragment of J|p=3/2- {+59}Ni(878 level) analogue. 
E 4771.1 {I11} from E(p) and S(p). 
Other J: 3/2 from |g(|q) (1975Tr05). 
T from (2J+1)|G{-|g}|G{-p0}=0.120 eV {I8} (1980Co02), assuming |G{-p0}/|G=0.65 {I4} from ({+3}He,d), |G=|G{-p0}+|G{-|g} and J=3/2. 
S from 1970Ho34. Others: 1376 {I2} (1957Bu64), 1378 {I4} (1985Di05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1423.6 {I4} 
E From E(p) and S(p). Fragment of 3/2- {+59}Ni(878 level) analogue. |G=50 eV {I50} (1959Bo14). 
S from 1963Bo07. 1985Di05 report 1424 {I4}. 
An additional transition (E|g=3432 {I1}, I|g>2) deexciting this level to an otherwise unknown level is reported in 1970Ho34; it is also reported in 1968Tr04, but absent in 1985Di05 and 1977Kr06. Evaluator omits that |g here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1663 {I2} 
Analogue of J|p=5/2- {+59}Ni(1189 level). 
E$from E(p) and S(p). 5051 {I4} from 1985Di05. 
S from 1957Bu64. 1664 {I4} from 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1716 {I2} 
E from E(p) and S(p). 5102 {I4} from 1985Di05. 
S from 1957Bu64. 1985Di05 report 1717 {I4}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1833 {I2} 
S,E$E(p)=1833 {I2} from 1957Bu64; also observed in 1975Tr05 but absent in 1985Di05. E(level) from E(p) and S(p). 
J from |g(|q) for 5219 to 1399 and 6905 to 5219 transitions (1977Co03). 
T weighted average of 9.4 fs {I14} and 11.1 fs {I14} (from DSAM) and 12.1 fs {I28} (based on measured |G{-|g}/|G=0.86 {I4} and (2J+1)|G{-|g}|G{-p0}/|G=0.046 eV {I5} for 5219 level) (1977Co03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2,5/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1843.5 {I6} 
Analogue of J|p=1/2- {+59}Ni(1301 level). 
E from E(p) and S(p). 5227 {I4} from 1985Di05. 
S from 1963Bo07 (cf. 1844 from 1985Di05). 
|G=100 eV {I50} (1959Bo14). 
Data for this resonance are erroneously attributed to an 1884 resonance in 1994Ho31. Those authors also report a 2923|g feeding an otherwise unknown 3/2- 2310 level; this |g is omitted here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1870 
E: from 1985Ti04. E(p): from E(level) and S(p). Reported by 1985Ti04; structure visible in yield function of 1985Di05, but not listed in tables. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1881 {I4} 
J from |g(|q), 1975Tr05. 
Note that data reported for this resonance in 1994Ho31 are actually for the 1844 resonance. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2143 {I4} 
Fragment of 5/2- {+59}Ni(1680 level) analogue. 
J 5/2 from |g(|q) in 1983Si24. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2172 {I4} 
J Other: 3/2,5/2 from |g(|q) (1983Si24). 
Fragment of 5/2- {+59}Ni(1680 level) analogue. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2244 {I4} 
J from |g(|q) (1975Tr05). 
S E(p)=2238 in 1975Tr05. E(p)=2232 in 1983Si24 and 1960Ca12. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2266 {I4} 
E(p)=2256 in 1983Si24; J=1/2,3/2,5/2 from |g(|q) (1983Si24). 
Fragment of J|p=3/2- {+59}Ni(1735 level) analogue. 
1994Ho31 report a |g branch to an otherwise unknown 2337 level; the evaluator omits that |g and final level here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2525 {I4} 
Analogue of 7/2- {+59}Ni(1948 level). 
1994Ho31 suggest that this level has J|p=5/2- and that it is the analogue of an otherwise unknown 5/2- {+59}Ni level at 1969 keV; in the absence of any supporting evidence, the evaluator rejects this suggestion. Their reported photon branching also differs significantly from that shown here (4983|g (19%), 4498|g (73%), 3909|g (8%)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2601 {I4} 
E,S E(p)=2603 resonance of 1983Si24 could be 2598 and/or 2601 resonances of 1985Di05. 
J J=5/2 from |g(|q) (1983Si24), but result unreliable if resonance is complex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2670 {I4} 
E(p)=2668 resonance of 1983Si24 probably corresponds to E(p)=2670 resonance of 1985Di05, but may include a contribution from the 2664 resonance since |d(g.s. transition) from 1983Si24 is inconsistent with that from 1985Di05 for 2670 resonance. 1983Si24 assign J=3/2 based on |g(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2835 {I4} 
Possible fragment of J|p=3/2- {+59}Ni(2415 level) analogue. 
Other J: 3/2 from |g(|q) in 1983Si24, assuming authors observed this resonance alone. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2872 {I4} 
Possible J|p=3/2- {+59}Ni(2415 level) analogue fragment. 
Other J: 3/2 from |g(|q) for E(p)=2869 resonance (1983Si24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2958 {I4} 
Other J: 3/2,5/2 from |g(|q) for E(p)=2960 resonance (1983Si24); not adopted because that resonance may be complex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2976 {I4} 
Other J: 3/2 from |g(|q) for E(p)=2978 resonance (1983Si24), but 1983Si24 may not have resolved the 2971 and 2976 resonances of 1985Di05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2999 {I4} 
Other J: 3/2 from |g(|q) for E(p)=2999 resonance (1983Si24). 
1994Ho31 suggest that this level is the analogue of the 3/2- {+59}Ni(2415 level). However, others have nominated the 6197, 6201 and 6238 levels, instead, as fragments of that analogue state. Also, 1994Ho31 report a 5.3% photon branch to the 3115 level. The evaluator does not adopt this; 1985Di05 should have seen such a branch too, but did not. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,3/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3047 {I4} 
Other J: 5/2,3/2 from |g(|q) for E(p)=3051 resonance (1983Si24); however, it is not clear whether 1983Si24 resolved the 3041 and 3047 resonances. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3056 {I4} 
J from |g(|q) for E(p)=3062 resonance (1983Si24). 
1994Ho31 suggest this is analogue of an otherwise unknown 1/2-,3/2- {+59}Ni(2533 level); evaluator rejects this. 1994Ho31 also report a strong |g from this level to an otherwise unknown 5/2- 2337 level; the evaluator assumes that this is, instead, the transition to the 3/2- 2324 level, reported in 1983Si24. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2,5/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3108 {I4} 
J from |g(|q) for E(p)=3106 resonance (1983Si24). Evaluator assumes that resonances 9 keV below and 11 keV above were resolved from this one in 1983Si24. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3131 {I4} 
Analogue of {+59}Ni(2627 level) (J|p=7/2-). 
1994Ho31 report 6 of the 23 gammas listed here as deexciting this level, but the branch to the 2716 level (expected to be the strongest) is not one of those. If one assumes that 1994Ho31 failed to resolve the 3777|g and 3784|g, the consistency between branching from 1994Ho31 and 1985Di05 is greatly improved. However, it is possible that 1994Ho31 also failed to resolve the E(p)=3131 resonance from the weaker 3125 resonance. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3440 {I4} 
E$In Adopted Levels high spin state (19/2+) at 6769.3 - probably a different level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3550 {I4} 
Possible fragment of |p=9/2+ {+59}Ni(3054 level) analogue. 
E 6902.8 {I5} (1975Co21). 
J confirmed by (p,p'|g) angular correlation data (1982Sz01). 
Other E(p): 3568 (1960Ca12), 3546 (1975Co21), 3547 (1975Kl06), 3556 (1980Ho31). 
(2J+1)|G{-p0}|G{-|g}/|G=6.5 eV {I5}; weighted average of 6.2 eV {I7} (1975Co21), 6.9 eV {I8} (1976Ar01). Others: 1980Ho31 (8 eV {I4}), 1960Ca12 (7.5 eV), 1975Kl06 (5.4 eV {I10}), 1972Sz01 (10.0 eV {I9}), 1970Fo09. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3605 {I4} 
J from 1994Ho31, presumably based on 6959|g(|q). 
Possible fragment of J=3/2 {+59}Ni(3182 level) analogue. (1994Ho31). 1994Ho31 report an additional |g branch from this level; the evaluator does not adopt it because it feeds an otherwise unknown 2310 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3613 {I4} 
Possible fragment of J=3/2 {+59}Ni(3182 level) analogue. 
E Other: 6970.1 {I10} (1985Ti04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3848 {I4} 
J from |g(|q) 1994Ho31. Authors suggest that this is analogue of the {+59}Ni(3354 level) (J|p unknown). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3903 {I4} 
J D |g to 3/2- from |g(|q) (1994Ho31); |g to 7/2- 1399. Authors suggest that this is analogue of a 3389-keV {+59}Ni level, but the evaluator is uncertain which of the adopted levels corresponds to that state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4099 {I4} 
Possible analogue of {+59}Ni(3563 level) (1985Di05); |?30 keV below level proposed in (p,X). Not adopted as analogue. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4173 {I4} 
Suggested analogue of L(p,d)=3 {+59}Ni(3730 level), but J=7/2 for that state from (pol p,d) is not consistent with probable J(7517). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,L from fig. 2 of 1993InZZ; absent from table 1. Almost certainly a {+61}Cu level (see table 2 of 1993InZZ); level not included in adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Possible analogue of {+59}Ni(g.s.). 
1993InZZ report E=3940 and C{+2}S'=0.84 (if 2p{-3/2} orbital). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Probable {+59}Ni(465 level) analogue. E=4330 {I50} in 1969Ok01. 
L,S from 1969Ok01. C{+2}S'=0.11 in 1993InZZ. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E possible {+59}Ni(878 level) analogue (1969Ok01). 
For L=1 component of E=4810 doublet in 1993InZZ, C{+2}S'=0.11 assuming 2p{-3/2} orbital. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(1302 level) analogue. E=5190 {I50} in 1969Ok01; E=5270, C{+2}S'=0.13 in 1993InZZ. 
|G{-p0}=66 eV {I10} (1976Vi06). C{+2}S' is from 1969Ok01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E 1976Vi06 report a possible doublet at E=6520 {I30}. 
|G{-p0}=510 eV {I140}, 370 eV {I50} for doublet (1976Vi06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
E,J possible doublet. 
S from 1993InZZ for L=2 component of E=7180 doublet. 
|G{-p0}=3.4 keV {I5}, 1.9 keV {I3} (1976Vi06) for doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S from 1993InZZ, for component of E=7180 doublet. 
|G{-p0}=1.9 keV {I4}, 1.00 keV {I15} (1976Vi06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E for doublet. L and C{+2}S' are for component of doublet. 
|G{-p0}=1.08 keV {I15}, 6.4 keV {I10} (1976Vi06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E average of 3897 {I7} (1976Bi07) and 3912 {I9} (1976Ga19). 
{+59}Ni(g.s.) analogue fragment. 
|G{-p0}/|G<0.01 (1976Ga19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(1680 level) analogue (1976Ga19); however, 5521 and 5550 levels are associated with that analogue in (p,|g). 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.98 {I4} (1976Ga19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
Association with {+59}Ni(1948 level) analogue (1976Ga19) rejected by evaluator; E|?40 keV lower than suggested in (p,|g), and analogue requires J=7/2. 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.98 {I2}; |G{-p1}/|G=0.010 {I5} (1976Ga19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(3054 level) analogue fragment. 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.92 {I4}; |G{-p1}/|G=0.060 {I15}; |G{-p2}/|G=0.012 {I5} (1976Ga19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2,11/2
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(3054 level) analogue fragment. 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.87 {I4}; |G{-p1}/|G=0.012 {I2}; |G{-p2}/|G=0.010 {I5} (1976Ga19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(3026 level) analogue (1976Ga19). However, E exceeds that for 3054-level analogue and is more appropriate for 3182-level (J=3/2) analogue. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(3452 level) analogue fragment (1976Ga19); however, E|?60 keV below that adopted from (p,|g). 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.75 {I4}; |G{-p1}/|G=0.20 {I4} (1976Ga19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(3454 level) analogue fragment (1976Ga19); however, E|?50 keV below that adopted from (p,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(4506 level) analogue fragment. 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.77 {I3}; |G{-p1}/|G=0.21 {I2} (1976Ga19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
Possible {+59}Ni(4506 level) analogue fragment. 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.84 {I4}; |G{-p1}/|G=0.170 {I15} (1976Ga19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
Double IAS. E from 1991Mo02 based on Q=-15.9 MeV {I1} (1991Mo02). Other Q: -16.10 MeV {I6} (1994Sm05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
$Ep{-c.m.}=1.94E3 keV 2 (doublet) feeds {+58}Ni 4+ state at 2459.21 keV, branching 2% {i1} and %Ip{-rel}=0.1 {i1} compared to most intense 2890|g from this level (2002Ru06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
$Ep{-c.m.}=1.94E3 keV 2 (doublet) feeds {+58}Ni 4+ state at 2459.21 keV, branching 11% {i3} and %Ip{-rel}=0.7 {i2} compared to most intense 2923|g from this level (2002Ru06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_comment:
$Ep{-c.m.}=1.90E3 keV 3 feeds {+58}Ni 8+ state at 6604.6 keV, branching 9% {i2} and %Ip{-rel}=1.4 {i3} compared to most intense 1556|g from this level (2002Ru06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2-
level_comment:
$Ep{-c.m.}=2.47E3 keV 3 feeds {+58}Ni 7- state at 6084.7 keV, branching 53% {i8} and %Ip{-rel}=0.6 {i2} compared to 4931|g intensity from this level (2002Ru06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_comment:
$Ep{-c.m.}=1.97E3 keV 4 feeds {+58}Ni 8+ state at 6604.6 keV, branching 8% {i3} and %Ip{-rel}=0.4 {i2} compared to most intense 3922|g from this level (2002Ru06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3166.6 
S 0.110 keV {I11} (1970Br33), 0.160 keV {I32} (1976Ar01), 0.30 eV {I3} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3388.2 
$|G{-p0}=0.03 {I1} 
J,L From 1976Ar01; Ep=3386.5 in 1976FlZY may represent the same resonance level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3388.5 
$|G{-p0}=0.012 {I4} 
J 5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g) (1979Kr20). 
|G{-p1}=20 eV {I10} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3451.3 
$|G{-p0}=0.0110 {I11} 
J 3/2 from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g) (1979Kr20). 
S 50 eV {I10} (1976Ar01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3475.0 
$|G{-p0}=0.0097 {I4} 
|G{-p1}=1.41 eV {I20} (1976Ar01); others:1 eV {I1} (1976FlZY), 3.7 eV (1982Sz01) (cf. 2.0 in ({+3}He,dp)). |G{-p0}/|G=0.86 {I5} (1976Ar01). Other |G{-p0}: 15 eV {I5} (1976FlZY). 
J confirmed by (p,p'|g) angular correlation data (1982Sz01). 
Other E(p): 3489 (1980Ho31), 3473.3 {I30} in (p,p) (1976Ar01). 
(2J+1)|G{-p0}|G{-|g}/|G=1.1 eV {I1} (1976Ar01) 
$|G from |G{-p0} (9.7 eV {I4}) + |G{-p1} (1.41 eV {I20}) + |G{-|g} (0.13 eV {I2}) from 1976Ar01. 
E Possible fragment of analogue of Ni(3054 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3506.6 
$|G{-p0}=0.080 {I8} 
|G{-p1}=5 eV {I2}, J=3/2 (1976FlZY); J=1/2 (1976Ar01). 
J (1/2,3/2)- from |s(E(p),|q); 3/2 from |g(|q) (1979Kr20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3519.0 
$|G{-p0}=0.070 {I4} 
S weighted average of 69 eV {I3} (1976Ar01), 80 eV {I8} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3546.4 
$|G{-p0}=0.0244 {I8} 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.70 {I4} (1976Ar01). 
$|G from |G{-p0} (24.4 eV {I8}) + |G{-p1} (9.6 eV {I12}) + |G{-|g} (1.1 eV {I2}) (1976Ar01). Other |G: 65 eV {I10} (1972Ma51); 50 eV {I11} from |G{-p0}=35 eV {I5} (1976FlZY) if |G{-p0}/|G=0.70 (as in 1976Ar01). 
Possible fragment of analogue of Ni(3054 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3586.1 
$|G{-p0}=0.0140 {I15} 
|G{-p1}=10 eV {I4} (1976FlZY). |G{-p0}=80 eV {I16} in 1976Ar01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3608.6 
|G{-p1}=78 eV {I10} (1976FlZY). J=3/2,5/2, |G{-p0}=180 eV {I18}, 75.6 eV {I25}, from 1976FlZY, 1976Ar01, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2)-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3612.1 
J=3/2,1/2, |G{-p0}=35.5 eV {I39}, 130 eV {I13} from 1976Ar01, 1976FlZY, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3687.5 
$|G{-p0}=0.018 {I5} 
J 5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g) (1979Kr20). 
|G{-p1}=11 eV {I3} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3743.2 
$|G{-p0}=0.0315 {I7} 
|G{-p1}=20 eV {I5} (1976FlZY). Data of 1976FlZY imply |G{-p0}/|G=0.94 {I3} (cf. 1.00 from 1976Ar01). 
Possible analogue of Ni(3182 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3752.3 
$|G{-p0}=1.7 {I2} 
|G{-p1}=264 eV {I30} (1976FlZY). |G from |G{-p0}+|G{-p1} implies |G{-p}/|G=0.87 {I10} (cf. 0.8 in 1976Ar01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3785.7 
$|G{-p0}=0.809 {I42} 
|G{-p0}/|G=0.9 (1976Ar01). 
S other: 600 eV {I60} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3798.3 
$|G{-p0}=0.084 {I20} 
S weighted average of 100 eV {I20} (1976Ar01), 60 eV {I25} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3914.7 
$|G{-p0}=1.4 {I2} 
|G{-p1}=555 eV {I103} (1976FlZY). |G from |G{-p0}+|G{-p1} implies |G{-p0}/|G=0.72 {I13} (cf. 0.68 from 1976Ar01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3936.2 
|G{-p1}=28 eV {I8} (1976FlZY); |G{-p0}=40 eV {I4} (1976Ar01), 130 eV {I20} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3939.9 
|G{-p1}=11 eV {I2} (1976FlZY). |G{-p0}=151 eV {I7} (1976Ar01), 450 eV {I45} (1976FlZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4000.2 
$|G{-p0}=0.081 {I10} 
E,J,L from 1976Ar01; not reported by 1976FlZY. E scale of 1976Ar01 is |?5 keV lower than that of 1976FlZY so this level differs from the 7356 level of 1976FlZY only if authors' J assignments are correct. Not adopted. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$S{-1}S{-2}=1.28 
Excited in all the above reactions; p{-3/2} transfer consistent with |s(|q) in ({+13}C,{+12}B) (1988Vo08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$S{-1}S{-2}=2.86 
E From ({+16}O,{+15}N) (1986OkZU). Also excited in ({+13}C,{+12}B), ({+10}B,{+9}Be). f{-5/2} transfer consistent with |s(|q) in ({+13}C,{+12}B). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$S{-1}S{-2}=2.53 
E From 1988Vo08. Other: 3060 (1986OkZU). g{-9/2} transfer (T{-<} state) consistent with |s(|q) in ({+13}C,{+12}B). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$S{-1}S{-2}=1.0 
E From 1988Vo08 ({+13}C,{+12}B); g{-9/2} transfer (T{->} state) consistent with |s(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$Fast beam laser spectroscopy (2011Vi03). |m=+1.219 {I3} atomic beam (1968Ph04,2005St24,2011StZZ); deduced using a hyperfine-structure ratio and the magnetic moment value of the standard {+63}Cu. Value subject to hyperfine anomaly correction. 
T weighted average of five values: 24.39 min {I9} (1982Gr10), 24.0 min {I3} (1972Du09), 22.9 min {I1} (1966Sh12), 23.4 min {I2} (1954Nu26), and 24.6 min {I3} (1947Le07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$atomic beam (1958Re10,1957Ni09); hyperfine structure (2011Vi03, 2010Vi07). Parity from L({+3}He,d)=1. 
$Dominant configuration=|pp{-3/2} from comparison of measured g factor with predictions from shell-model calculations (2010Vi07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$ from 2011Vi03 (also 2010Vi07), hyperfine structure using collinear laser spectroscopy. Value of Q=-0.211 {I10} in 2011Vi03 and -0.21 {I2} in 2010Vi07 re-evaluated by 2013StZZ. Other |m: +2.14 {I4} (atomic beam, 1966Do01) 
T$weighted average of 3.32 h {I3} (1954Be84), 3.27 h {I10} (1956Ru45), 3.408 h {I10} (1969Ri04, uncertainty increased to 0.030 in averaging procedure), 3.26 h {I5} (1972Du09), 3.34 h {I1} (1972Cr02), 3.39 h {I4} (1973Ne02) 3.24 h {I16} (1982Ma41), 3.333 {I5} (1982Gr10, uncertainty is statistical, increased to 0.010 in averaging procedure), 3.36 h {I6} (2006Ab30). Others: 3.4 h {I1} (1937Ri01,1937Th01,1950Ku05,1950Bo34), 3.33 h (1948Co08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 5/2-. (5/2-) proposed for a 2335 {I5} group in (|a,p) is in disagreement, if same level as 2336.4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=(4) suggests (7/2+,9/2+), but |g to 3/2- and |g from a 6627, 1/2- level requiring high multipolarities disfavors such an assignment. It is possible there are two separate levels near this energy, one with a high spin of 7/2 or 9/2 and the other of low spin of 1/2,3/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$ |s(|q) and DWBA in (|a,p) suggest (11/2-); but gamma rays from 3/2 resonances at 6362, 6372 and 6393 suggest a maximum spin of 7/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$ |s(|q) and DWBA in (|a,p) suggest (7/2,9/2), but it is in conflict with |g from a 1/2+ resonance at 6802 keV. There may be two separate levels near this energy, one of high spin 7/2 or 9/2 and the other of low spin of 1/2 or 3/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$there is probably a doublet at 1876 keV. The dominant component is probably a fragment of the analog of the 283-keV, 1/2-, state in {+61}Ni. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$probably a fragment of the analog of the 656-keV, 1/2-, state in {+61}Ni. E(p)=2242 {I5} (1988Iz01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=0.36 mb/sr 
E$probable analog of 3/2-, g.s. and 5/2-, 67-keV in {+61}Ni. C{+2}S(2J+1)=2.28 for configuration=1f{-5/2}. 
$May correspond to 6450 {I40} + 6520 {I40} (1976Bo06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=0.16 mb/sr 
E$probable analogs of 3/2-, 1100-keV, 5/2-, 1132-keV, 3/2-, 1185-keV levels in {+61}Ni. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$evaluators assume 5860.6, but it could be 5906.6 as well 
$A 5960.6 {I10} level in table 4 of 1989Ti01 seems a misprint. In 1999-Nuclear Data Sheets (1999Bh04), Ep(lab) deduced from this value was listed at 1108.2, which also seems a misprint. 
$S{-0}=6.7 {I19} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$spin from atomic-beam method (1966Do01,1968Ph04,2010Vi07); parity from log| {Ift}=4.99 {I6} from 0+ in {+62}Zn |e decay 
MOMM1,MOME2$ from hyperfine structure using resonance Ionization laser ion source (RILIS) used to laser ionize the atoms followed by high- resolution isotope separation (HRS) and ISCOOL Paul trap at ISLODE-CERN (2011Vi03). Previous preliminary results from the same group are: |m=-0.3809 {I12}, Q=0.00 {I2} (2010Vi07,2011StZZ). Other: |m=-0.380 {I4} (1968Ph04, 1989Ra17, atomic beam) 
T$Weighted average of two sets of data from 1997Zi06 (also 2002Un02). Others: 10.5 min {I5} (1937He05, also Nature 138, 723 (1936); Physica 4, 160 (1937)); 10.5 min {I3} (1937Bo10), 10.0 min {I1} (1937Ri01), 9.92 min {I5} (1939Cr03), 10.1 min {I1} (1947Le07), 9.88 min (1948Wa13), 9.9 min (1948Pe03), 9.80 min {I7} (1951Go43), 9.8 min (1952Ma28), 9.73 min {I2} (1954Be84), 10.1 min {I2} (1954Nu27), 9.94 min {I4} (1958Po07), 9.90 min {I4} (1961Sa19), 9.76 min {I2} (1965Eb01), 9.79 min {I6} (1965Li11), 9.7 min (1966Ch24), 9.7 min {I1} (1969Bo11), 9.73 min {I2} (1969Jo07), 9.80 min {I2} (1975Ca40). Weighted average of all data listed with quantified uncertainties is 9.76 min {I2}, but with reduced |h{+2}=2.5 to 5.4 depending on which method is used. LWM gives 9.90 min {I17} in order to include the most precise value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$ TDPAC method (1993Lo10). Others: +1.32 {I3} (1973Bl07, 1989Ra17, TDPAD), +1.34 {I12} (1970BoZE,TDPAC). compilation 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+62}Zn |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J J=3 from |g(|q) in {+62}Ni(p,n|g); |p=+ from L(d,|a)=4(+2). Consistent with L(d,t)=1+(3), L({+3}He,d)=1 
T$from DSAM in {+62}Ni(p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$J=2,3 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); 3 from DCO in {+52}Cr({+16}O,|apn|g); |p=+ from L({+3}He,d)=1. Consistent with L(d,t)=1+(3), L(d,|a)=(2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ target; 3 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g). However, L({+3}He,d)=2 gives conflicting parity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Implies the existence of two levels around 1428 keV, since 752|g is not reported in {+62}Zn decay and cannot be placed from the 1429.59 level within the uncertainties. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=1 from 3/2- target; consistent with L(d,|a)=2+(4). Gammas to 3+ and 4+; possible gamma to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
E$ note that a doublet has been defined at 1677.6 and 1678.1, based on (|a,n|g) results; 922.4, 1040 and 1434.0 |g transitions were seen only in (|a,n|g) data, not in later heavy-ion studies (1999Si03,2001Mu14). This also suggests higher spin for 1677.6 level and lower for 1678.3 level 
J$|DJ=1 d+Q |g to 4+ from |g(|q) and DCO ratios; L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ target assuming 1680 {i5} group corresponds to 1677.6 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:3)(+)
level_comment:
E$ see comment for 1677.6 level 
J$ gammas to 1+ and 2+; L(d,t)=1(+3) from 3/2- target assuming 1680 {I6} group corresponds to 1678.3 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$ gammas to 2+ and (3)+; L({+3}He,d)=0 from 3/2- target assuming 1684 {I10} group corresponds to 1682.1 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=4 from 3/2- target; L(d,|a)=(5) from 0+ target. Positive parity suggested in ({+16}O,|apn|g) seems incorrect 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E estimated from the statement by 1975Ca18 that Q=-9.35 MeV (from 1967Ve10) gives correct location of their quasi-elastic IAS 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E assumed that quasi-inelastic 2+ IAS observed by 1975Ca18 is the analog of first 2+ level of {+62}Ni 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
Decay by unreported |g ray(s) is probable since I|g of incoming gammas exceeds I|g of outgoing gammas. Other branches are known in {+59}Co(|a,n|g) and {+62}Ni(p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E 1507.4 if this level decays by the 832|g, or 1504.9 if by the 777|g; within the uncertainties given by 1977Ch04, this level cannot decay by both of these |g rays. Possible doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E 1977Ch04 propose a doublet because there are so many modes of deexcitation. 978.8|g reported in Table 1 of 1977Ch04 should be deleted (1978ChZG). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E if E|g uncertainties estimated by 1977Ch04 are valid, this is a triplet with E=1743.4, 1745.0 and 1748.9 keV (1978ChZG). Only one of these possible levels has been adopted: level with the 1046.7|g decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
g=+0.63 if hyperfine field in Ni is -47.2 kG (1969SuZT) 
T 1976Ch17, 1977Ch31. 1969SuZT give 11.5 ns 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J assignment of 3+ quoted by 1970Da15 from {+60}Ni(|a,pn|g) data of 1969SuZT is not supported by |g|g(|q) of 1973Bl07, which suggests J=4+. Data on {+64}Zn(d,|a) give L=4 for this level (1973Da28), allowing J|p=(3,4,5)+. Measurements by 1976Ch17 from {+60}Ni(|a,pn|g) and other reactions indicate J=4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$spin from optical spectroscopy (1976Fu06) and collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07); |p=- from L(t,|a)=1 from 0+. 
MOMM1$from 2019StZV evaluation based on +2.221535 {I3} measured by 1978Lu08 using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance method with {+109}Ag as reference. Other: +2.2236 {I4} (2010Vi07), using collinear and in-source laser spectroscopic technique. 
MOME2$from 2021StZZ compilation based on 0.210 {I15} measured by 1982Ef01 using Muonic X-ray hyperfine structure. Other: -0.211 {I7} from 2010Vi07 using collinear laser spectroscopy. See also 2021StZZ compilation 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu, {+63}Cu)=-0.140 fm{+2} {I7} (stat) {I20} (syst) (2020De21). 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu, {+63}Cu)=-0.148 fm{+2} {I1} (stat) {I17} (syst) (2016Bi08). 
$Evaluated rms charge radius=3.8823 fs {I15} (2013An02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,{+3}He)=1 from 0+; L-1/2 from analyzing powers 
T$weighted average of 0.215 ps {I22} from (|a,p|g) by DSAM, 0.196 ps {I7} from (|g,|g') by nuclear resonance fluorescence, and 0.22 ps {I2} from Coulomb excitation by DSAM, 0.219 ps {I48} from (d,{+3}He|g) by DSAM. 
BE2$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 0.0098 {I34} from (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+; L-1/2 from analyzing powers 
T$weighted average of 0.57 ps {I7} from (|a,p|g) by DSAM, 1.9 ps {I+6-3} from (|a,pn|g) by DSAM, 0.57 ps {I3} from (|g,|g') by nuclear resonance fluorescence, 0.52 ps {I+24-17} from (d,{+3}He|g) by DSAM, and 0.61 ps {I4} from Coulomb excitation by DSAM. Other: 0.54 ps {I+7-6} from B(E2)|^=0.0355 {I16} 
BE2$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 0.0170 {I25} from (e,e'), which gives a |d(962|g)=-0.33 {I4} inconsistent with values from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g) and Coulomb excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+; L+1/2 from analyzing powers 
T$weighted average of 0.61 ps {I6} from (|a,p|g) by DSAM, 0.8 ps {I+3-2} from (|a,pn|g) by DSAM, 0.53 ps {I+6-5} from (|g,|g') by nuclear resonance, 0.51 ps {I+14-10} from (p,p'|g) by DSAM, 0.81 ps {I+20-18} from (d,{+3}He|g) by DSAM, and 0.61 ps {I6} from Coulomb excitation by DSAM. Other: 0.52 ps {I4} from B(E2)|^=0.0445 {I30} and adopted |g branching ratios. 
BE2$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 0.0073 {I17} from (e,e') is inconsistent with 0.039 {I4} calculated from adopted T{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,{+3}He)=L(t,|a)=L(d,n)=L({+3}He,d)=3 from 0+; 742.27|g E2 to 1/2- 
T$weighted average of 2.0 ps {I3} from (|a,p|g) by DSAM, 1.15 ps {I+28-19} from measured width in (|g,|g') , 1.7 ps {I+59-11} from (d,{+3}He|g) by DSAM. Other: 0.26 ps {I+16-9} from B(E2)|^=0.013 {I4} in Coulomb excitation and adopted |g branching ratios is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,{+3}He)=L(t,|a)=1 from 0+; 584.9|g D(+Q) to 5/2- 
T$weighted average of 122 fs {I12} from (|a,p|g) by DSAM, 114 fs {I+16-13} from width in (|g,|g'), 97 fs {I+22-18} in (p,p'|g) by DSAM, 300 fs {I+550-130} in (d,{+3}He|g) by DSAM. Other: 20 fs {I+20-12} deduced from B(E2)|^=0.0096 {I9} in Coulomb excitation and adopted |g branching ratios is in a disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$weighted average of 1.14 ps {I28} from (|a,p|g), 1.4 ps {I+14-10} from (|a,pn|g), 0.65 ps {I+16-11} from width in (|g,|g'), 0.53 ps {I+14-9} from (p,p'|g), and 0.66 ps {I+24-18} from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 0.24 ps {I+4-3} from B(E2)|^=0.0115 {I15} in Coulomb excitation and adopted |g-ray branching ratios is in a disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(t,|a)=1 from 0+; 1048.8|g M1+E2 to 5/2- 
T$weighted average of 35 fs {I8} from (|a,p|g) by DSAM, 32 fs {I+7-5} from (p,p'|g) by DSAM, and 44 fs {I+7-5} from width in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 0+; probable 342.5|g from 7/2-. But (1/2)- from (|a,p|g) 
T$weighted average of 0.15 ps {I7} from (|a,p|g) and 0.30 ps {I+10-5} from (p,p'|g), both by DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$534.0|g M1+E2 to 3/2-, 754.2|g D(+Q) to 7/2- 
T$weighted average of 115 fs {I+26-13} from (p,p'|g) by DSAM and 175 fs {I+65-37} from width in (|g,|g') and adopted |g-ray branching ratios 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(pol d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$weighted average of 0.24 ps {I8} from (|a,p|g), 0.37 ps {I+11-6} from (p,p'|g), and 0.165 ps {I+52-45} from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 1.4 ps {I+14-7} from (|a,pn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2336.55 {I10} from (p,|g):E=res 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=L({+3}He,d)=3 from 0+; 2336.5|g D(+Q) to 3/2- 
T$from DSAM in (p,p'|g). Other: 1.3 ps {I+4-3} from width in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J$from L(t,|a)=2 from 0+. E3 excitation from 3/2- indicates 9/2+ for a level at 2300 {I100} in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2404.7 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res 
J$2404.7|g E2 to 3/2-; L(d,{+3}He,d)=L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+ 
T$weighted average of 0.13 ps {I+10-5} from (d,{+3}He|g) and 0.125 ps {I+37-21} from (p,p'|g), by DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$(3/2,5/2) from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g); 1827.7|g D(+Q) to 1/2- 
T$from DSAM in (p,p'|g). Other: 109 fs {I+39-23} from width in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$9/2+ from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g) 
T$from DSAM in (|a,pn|g). Other: >67 fs from (d,{+3}He|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 2535.93 {I8} from (p,|g):E=res 
J$allowed |e+|b{++} decay from 3/2- parent; Mult=E2 for 443.07|g to 7/2- ruled out by RUL; 
T$from DSAM in (p,p'|g). Other: 0.109 ps {I+39-23} from width in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3 for a level 2674 {I5} and L(t,|a)=3 for a level at 2673 {I10} most likely correspond to this level, even though they may be probably multiplets also including other components. 
T$from DSAM in (d,{+3}He|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g) 
J$1350.1|g E2, |DJ=2 to 7/2-, 469.0|g M1(+E2) to 9/2-. E4 excitation from 3/2- for a level at 2730 {I50} in (e,e') is consistent, which could indicate it is the same level here while there is no other level around with J|p consistent with L(e,e')=4 from 3/2- 
T$weighted average of 0.58 ps {I15} from (|a,p|g) and 0.8 ps {I+6-2} from (|a,pn|g), by DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2-)
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g) 
J$1131.0|g to 3/2-, 1716.8|g to 5/2-; L(p,t)=4 from 3/2- for a level at 2680 {I10}, which may be a multipet including this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2716.9 {I4} from (n,|g):E=res 
J$allowed |e+|b{++} feeding from 3/2- parent; 624.4|g to 7/2- 
T$from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 for a level at 2780; Mult=E2 for 244.3|g to 5/2- ruled out by RUL 
T$from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2806.6 {I5} from (p,|g):E=res 
J$L(d,n)=1 from 0+ for a level at 2810; 1481.0|g to 7/2- 
T$from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 2831.3 from (p,|g):E=res 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+ for a level at 2835 {I5} and L(t,|a)=3 for a level at 2836 {I15}, which could be a doublet of 2833+2836. E2 excitation from 3/2- in (e,e') for a level at 2800 {I100} very likely correspond to this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g) 
J$976.0|g to 7/2-, 2166.0|g to 1/2-; L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+ for a level at 2835 {I5} and L(t,|a)=3 for a level at 2836 {I15} level, both probably doublet of 2833+2835 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same level as the 2858 level, but the evaluator lists it here as a separate level considering a large energy difference 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=1 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=L({+3}He,d)=1 from 0+; 1706.6|g to 7/2- can't be M3, since it would require an isomeric T{-1/2}>0.24 |ms based on B(M3)(W.u.)=10 from RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J$9/2 from DWBA analysis of |s(|q) in (|a,p) for a level at 3210; L(p,t)=4 from 3/2- for a level at 3210 {I20}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,{+3}He)=1 from 0+ for a level at 3296 {I5}, with L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers (1991Se09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(t,|a)=3 from 0+ and L(p,p')=L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=3 from 3/2- give 3/2+,5/2+, which is likely for a doublet of 3307+3310; 2627.25|g to 1/2- level. Other: E3 excitation from 3/2- in (e,e') gives 9/2+ for a level at 3300 {I100} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(d,{+3}He)=1 from 0+ for a level at 3434 {I5}; (3/2) from DWBA analysis of |s(|q) for a level at 3434 in (|a,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g) 
T$from DSAM in (|a,pn|g). Other: |<0.42 ps from DSAM in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$1008.9|g to 9/2-; 11/2- proposed in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) based on |g decay pattern, but now experimental evidence is available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
J$from L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 0+ for a level at 3600 {I20}. E2 excitation from 3/2- in (e,e') for a level at 3600 {I100} is consistent, which could be the same level here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2)+
level_comment:
J$from L(p,p')=L(p,t)=3 from 3/2-; 3049.24|g to 1/2-. But (5/2) from analysis of |s(|q) in (|a,p) for a level at 3712 is in a disagreement, which may indicate a different level in (|a,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2-)
level_comment:
$This level from (p,|g):E=res is considered by the evaluator as a different level from 3775.2 {I4} in (d,{+3}He|g) because they have no overlapping de-exciting |g transitions 
J$1712.22|g to (1/2)- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
E$from (p,p') and (p,t) 
J$from L(p,p')=L(p,t)=3 from 3/2-; (9/2+) from analysis of |s(|q) in (|a,p); E3 excitation from 3/2- in (e,e') gives 9/2+ for a level at 3800 {I100}, which could indicate it is the same level here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3 from 3/2- for a level at 3890 {I20}; L(p,t)=3 from 3/2- for a level at 3900 {I20}; L(t,|a)=2 from 0+ for a level at 3895 {I15} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
J$1255.4|g to 11/2-; 13/2- proposed in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) based on |g decay pattern, but no experimental evidence is available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,|ap|g) 
J$1623.9|g E2, |DJ=2 to 9/2+; 668.1|g D, |DJ=1 to 11/2+ 
T$from DSAM in (|a,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-:7/2-)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 3/2- and 5/2- disfavor 7/2+ and 1/2+, respectively. Other: (9/2) from (|a,p) for a level at 4135 is in disagreement, which might indicate a different level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1649.8|g E2, |DJ=2 to 9/2+; 694.1|g M1+E2 to 11/2+ (|a,pn|g). 
T$from DSAM in (|a,pn|g). Other: <0.56 from (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from 1983Ka24 using IPAD. See also 2020StZV evaluation. 
J$spin=17/2,13/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g); 342|g E2, |DJ=2 to 13/2+ 
T$from 342|g(t) in (|a,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$447.1|g M1+E2 to 13/2+; spin from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g) and excitation function 
T$from DSAM in (|a,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+:19/2+)
level_comment:
J$13/2,15/2+,19/2+ proposed in (|a,p|g) based on |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) while no evidence is available; 421.4|g to 17/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$11/2 from |g(|q), linear polarization, and yield curve of the 956-keV decay |g. 11/2- leads to unreasonably large B(M2)(W.u.) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$13/2+ and 9/2- from |g(|q) and linear polarization of decay data. 9/2- is unfavored considering yield curve and M2 strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
J$17/2+ and 13/2 from |g(|q) and linear polarization of the 341-keV |g ray. The yield curve of decay |g indicates a spin higher than 13/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 192 fs {I7} (1977Ca14,1981Ca10), 204 fs {I17} (1960Cu03), 215 fs {I21} (1961Ro06), 243 fs {I90} (1967Mo26), 194 fs {I16} (1975Bo40), and 284 fs {I76} (1972Wh08), using resonance scattering method 
$g|G{-0}=1.19|*10{+-3} eV {I4} (1981Ca10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.55 ps {I3} (1977Ca14,1981Ca10), 0.50 ps {I12} (1960Cu03), 0.62 ps {I10} (1961Ro06), 0.76 ps {I11} (1968Ta04), and 0.82 ps {I21} (1972Wh08), using resonance scattering method. 
$g|G{-0}=1.25|*10{+-3} eV {I6} (1981Ca10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.58 ps {I8} (1977Ca14,1981Ca10), 0.50 ps {I32}, (1972Wh08), and 0.50 ps {I+6-5} (from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 1976Sw01 and adopted |G{-0}/|G=0.838 {I4}) 
$W(|q)g|G{-0}{+2}/|G=1.04|*10{+-3} eV {I14} (1981Ca10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 1976Sw01 and adopted branching ratio |G{-0}/|G=0.721 {I5}. Other: <0.54 ps (1972Wh08) 
$W(|q)g|G{-0}{+2}/|G=0.260|*10{+-3} eV {I38} (1981Ca10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$1/2- excluded from |g(|q) of resonantly scattered |g. 
T$from |G=4.0|*10{+-3} eV {I5}, weighted average of 3.4|*10{+-3} eV {I22} (from g|G{-0}=2.6|*10{+-3} eV {I17}, 1981Ca10) and 4.0|*10{+-3} eV {I5} (from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G=2.5|*10{+-3} eV {I3}, 1976Sw01), using adopted |G{-0}/|G=0.787 {I9}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$1/2- is excluded from |g(|q) of resonantly scattered |g. 
T$from |G=0.0105 eV {I14}, deduced from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G and adopted |G{-0}/|G=0.517 {I19} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$3/2- excluded from g|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G (1976Sw01). 
T$from |G=0.0026 eV {I7}, deduced from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G and adopted |G{-0}/|G=0.443 {I33} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$average of 0.23 ps {I+4-3} (1965Es01), 0.18 ps {I2} (1967No04), 0.19 ps {I3} (1977Do16), and 0.27 ps {I2} (1973Fi15), all using DSAM. 
T$|t=0.33 ps {I+5-4} (1965Es01), 0.26 ps {I3} (1967No04), 0.39 ps {I2} (1973Fi15) 
BE2$weighted average of 0.0113 {I8} (1980Ku08), 0.010 {I1} (1956Te26), 0.013 {I2} (1962Er05), 0.0119 {I8} (1964El03), 0.0116 {I12} (1964Ro10), and 0.0120 {I6} (1998Si25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.67 ps {I6} (1965Es01), 0.57 ps {I6} (1967No04), 0.61 ps {I6} (1977Do16), and 0.59 ps {I4} (1973Fi15), all using DSAM. Other: 0.54 ps {I+7-6} from measured B(E2)|^=0.0355 {I17} and |d(962|g)=-0.479 {I21} from this dataset 
T$|t=0.96 ps {I+9-8} (1965Es01), 0.82 ps {I8} (1967No04), 0.85 ps {I6} (1973Fi15) 
BE2$weighted average of 0.0343 {I24} (1980Ku08), 0.038 {I6} (1962Er05), 0.036 {I4} (1964El03), 0.0349 {I35} (1964Ro10), and 0.0360 {I17} (1998Si25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.60 ps {I8} (1964Ro10), 0.58 ps {I6} (1965Es01), and 0.64 ps {I6} (1977Do16), all using DSAM. Other: 0.51 ps {I4} from measured B(E2)|^=0.0445 {I30} and |g branching ratios in this dataset 
T$|t=0.83 ps {I+9-8} (1965Es01) 
BE2$weighted average of 0.0406 {I30} (1980Ku08), 0.053 {I11} (1962Er05), 0.057 {I5} (1964El03), 0.040 {I5} (1964Ro10), and 0.045 {I4} (1998Si25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by the evaluator from measured B(E2)|^ and |g branching ratios in this dataset 
BE2$unweighted average of 0.0164 {I12} (1980Ku08) and 0.0086 {I24} (1998Si25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J>9/2 from feeding and excitation function of decay |g; 11/2+ from multipolarity and |d of the 956-keV |g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$feeding from (15/2+) level, deexcitation to (11/2+) and 9/2+ levels implies J=(11/2, 13/2); (13/2+) from E2 |g to 9/2+ level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$yrast-isomeric state from intense feeding, E2 |g to 13/2+ level. 
T$from |t=5.9 ns {I1}, weighted average of 5.9 ns {I1} from (|a,p2n|g) (1983Ka24) and 6.1 ns {I6} from (|a,p|g) (1980Ch28), using 342|g(t). 
$g=+0.184 {I12}, measured using TIPAD method (1983Ka24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
E$from E(p)=1298.27 {I9} (1986De14). Other: 7400.0 {I5} from E(p)=1298 in 1972Ki15 
J$from 1972Ki15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
E$from E(p)=1374.89 {I7} (1986De14). Other: 7472.7 {I5} from E(p)=1372 in 1972Ki15 
J$from 1972Ki15, 1968Tr04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
E$from E(p)=1432.74 {I22} (1986De14). Other: 7529.8 {I4} from E(p)=1430 in 1972Ki15 
J$from 1972Ki15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)
level_comment:
E$from E(p)=1509.57 {I8}, doublet (1986De14). Other: 7605.7 {I4} from E(p)=1507 in 1972Ki15, 1968Tr04 
J$from 1972Ki15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E,J$E(p)=2481; IAS({+63}Ni g.s.); |G{-|g}=1.5 eV (1975Kr10), 1.02 eV (1974Ra07). Probably includes J=3/2 or 5/2 resonance (1977Kr05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$E(p)=3751 {I4} (1972Sz01); not 9/2+ (1976Ar01); 3749.8 (1978Br35). 
$|G{-p}|G(7301|g)/|G=0.10 eV {I4} (1972Sz01), 0.05 eV {I3} (1978Br35). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$E(p)=3774 {I4} (1972Sz01); 3774.7, doublet (1978Br35). 
$|G{-p}|G(7324|g)/|G=0.21 eV {I5} (1972Sz01), 0.08 eV {I4} (1978Br35). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$E(p)=3786 {I4} (1972Sz01), 3788.0 (1978Br35). 
$|G{-p}|G(7336|g)/|G=0.45 eV {I5} (1972Sz01), 0.11 eV {I4} (1978Br35). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
$|G{-p}|G(7349|g)/|G=0.66 eV {I6} (1972Sz01), 0.16 eV {I5} (1978Br35). 
E$E(p)=3790.8 (1978Br35), others: 3799 (1979Vo01), 3790 {I4} (1972Sz01). 
J$9/2+ IAS (1972Sz01,1978Br35); not 9/2+ IAS (1979Vo01,1976Ar01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
J$9/2 from |g(|q) in 1978Br35; 9/2+ IAS (1972Sz01,1978Br35). 
$|G{-p}|G(7349|g)/|G=0.24 eV {I7} (1978Br35). 
E$E(p)=3795 (1978Br35). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$E(p)=3804 (1979Vo01), E(p)=3806 {I4} (1972Sz01), 3807 (1978Br35). 
J$9/2+ IAS (1972Sz01) 
$|G{-p}|G(7354|g)/|G=0.24 eV {I4} (1972Sz01), 0.09 eV {I5} (1978Br35). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=2481 {I2}, IAS(g.s. {+63}Ni) (1970Br33). Other: 2481 (1975Kr06). 
$Other |G{-p}=800 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=2 eV, S=0.39 (1974Ra07). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g0}=0.44 eV {I8} (1975Kr06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=2612.3 (1974Wi15). Other: 2612 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=20 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.069 eV, |G{-|g}=0.13 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=2613.9 (1974Wi15). Other: 2613 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=15 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.119 eV, |G{-|g}=0.04 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J,T$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2636.5 (1974Wi15). 
$|G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.019 eV, |G{-|g}=0.03 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2637.6 (1974Wi15). Other: 2638 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=10 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.101 eV, |G{-|g}=0.19 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2639.0 (1974Wi15). Other: 2639 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=5 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.026 eV, |G{-|g}=0.13 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=2646.6 (1974Wi15). Other: 2646 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=15 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.225 eV, |G{-|g}=0.26 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2650.6 (1974Wi15). Other: 2649 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=10 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.248 eV, |G{-|g}=0.15 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
T$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2653.6 (1974Wi15). 
$|G{-p}=5 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.122 eV, |G{-|g}=0.16 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2656.4 (1974Wi15), IAS(156 {+63}Ni). Other: 2656 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=10 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.278 eV, |G{-|g}=0.09 eV (1974Wi15). 
$|G{-p}=400 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=20 eV, S=0.11 (1974Ra07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=2661.7 (1974Wi15). Others: 2658 {I2} (1970Br33), 2659 (1975Kr06). 
$|G{-p}=40 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.585 eV, |G{-|g}=0.34 eV (1974Wi15). 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g0}=0.24 eV {I10} (1975Kr06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=2663.1 (1974Wi15). Other: 2659 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=125 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=1.194 eV, |G{-|g}=0.38 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J,T$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2666.4 (1974Wi15). 
$|G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.195 eV, |G{-|g}=0.04 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J,T$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2667.5 (1974Wi15). 
$|G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.164 eV, |G{-|g}=0.09 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J,T$from 1974Wi15. 
$E(p)(lab)=2670.4 (1974Wi15). 
$|G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.228 eV, |G{-|g}=0.11 eV (1974Wi15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J$1/2- from 1970Br33, 3/2- from 1976Ar01. 
T,L$from 1976Ar01. Other: |G{-p}=20 eV (1970Br33). 
$E(p)(lab)=2993.5 from 1976Ar01. Other: 2992 {I2} (1970Br33). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3035.7 (1976Ar01). Other: 3034 {I2} (1970Br33). 
J$1/2- from 1970Br33, 3/2- from 1976Ar01. 
T,L$from 1976Ar01. Other: |G{-p}=25 eV (1970Br33). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J$from 1976Ar01. Other: 1/2- (1970Br33). 
T$other: 110 eV (1970Br33). 
$E(p)(lab)=3044.3 from 1976Ar01, IAS(518 {+63}Ni). Other: 3044 {I2} (1970Br33). 
$|G{-p}=600 eV, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=54 eV, S=0.07 (1974Ra07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J,T$from 1976Ar01. Other: 1/2-, 95 eV (1970Br33). 
$E(p)(lab)=3059.8 from 1976Ar01. Other: 3058 {I2} (1970Br33). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J,T$from 1976Ar01. Other: 1/2-, 30 eV (1970Br33). 
$E(p)(lab)=3061.8 from 1976Ar01. Other: 3060 {I2} (1970Br33). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3516.6, IAS(1001 {+63}Ni) (1976Ar01). 
$|G{-p}=2.2, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=0.056, S=0.10 (1974Ra07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3749.8 (1978Br35), 3751 {I4} (1972Sz01). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.05 eV {I3} (1978Br35), 0.10 eV {I4} (1972Sz01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3774.7, doublet (1978Br35); 3774 {I4} (1972Sz01). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.08 eV {I4} (1978Br35), 0.21 eV {I5} (1972Sz01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3787, IAS(1292 {+63}Ni) from 1976Ar01 in (p,p) and 1972Sz01 and 1978Br35 in (p,|g). Other: 3788.0 (1978Br35), 3786 {I4} (1972Sz01). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.11 eV {I4} (1978Br35), 0.45 eV {I5} (1972Sz01), 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3790.8 (1978Br35), 3790 {I4} (1972Sz01). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.16 eV {I5} (1978Br35), 0.66 eV {I6} (1972Sz01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3793.8 (1978Br35). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.13 eV {I4} (1978Br35). 
$3893.8 in 1978Br35 is likely a misprint. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(lab)=3807.4 (1978Br35), 3806 {I4} (1972Sz01). 
$|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.09 eV {I5} (1978Br35), 0.24 eV {I4} (1972Sz01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E$estimated by the evaluator. 
$IAS(2294 {+63}Ni); |G{-p}=8.3, |G{-p'}(to 1172)=1.45, |G{-p'}(to 2047)=0.026, S=0.14 (1974Ra07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
S$others: 0.281 for a triplet of 2063+2082+2093 (1968Sm01); 0.46 for a doublet (1965Bl14); 0.20 (2013Sc06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E,J$IAS of {+63}Ni g.s. (1976Bo06,1979Fi02) 
L,S$from 1979Fi02 
$%p>99 to g.s. and <1% to 2+ level in {+62}Ni (1979Fi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
E,J$unresolved doublet: J=5/2-, IAS of 87 level in {+63}Ni; J=3/2-, IAS of 155 level in {+63}Ni (1976Bo06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E,J$IAS of 1292 level in {+63}Ni (1976Bo06,1979Fi02) 
S$coupling the 2+ core to a proton: C{+2}S<0.01 for L=2, 0.52 for L=4 (1979Fi02) 
$%p=81 {I13} to g.s. and 19 {I4} to 2+ level in {+62}Ni (1979Fi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E,J$IAS of 2291 level in {+63}Ni (1976Bo06,1979Fi02) 
L,S$from 1979Fi02 
$%p>95 to g.s. and <5 to 2+ level in {+62}Ni (1979Fi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E,J$IAS of 2514 level in {+63}Ni (1976Bo06,1979Fi02) 
S$coupling the 2+ core to a proton: C{+2}S=0.01 for L=2, 0.77 for L=4 (1979Fi02) 
$%p=10 {I3} to g.s. and 90 {I13} to 2+ level in {+62}Ni (1979Fi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1331 {I3} (1979Ha03) and 1327 {I5} (1991Se09) 
S$others: 1.4 (1979Ha03), 1.5 (1978Ze04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2088 {I4} (1979Ha03) and 2092 {I5} (1991Se09) 
S$others: 0.5 (1979Ha03), 0.45 (1978Ze04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3293 {I8} (1979Ha03) and 3297 {I5} (1991Se09) 
L$other: L=1(3) (1979Ha03) 
S$other: 0.09 for L=1 and J=3/2 (1979Ha03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E,L$this level is only resolved in (d,{+3}He|g) in 1992Se03 by the same authors of 1991Se09, which state that the |s(|q) of this level exhibited L=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 4260 {I20} (1979Ha03) 
L$other: 3(1) (1979Ha03) 
S$other: 0.7 for L=3 and J=7/2 (1979Ha03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$spin measured by 2010Vi07 by hyperfine structure using collinear laser spectroscopy; parity from L(d,{+2}He)=L(t,{+3}He)=0. Dominant configuration=|pp{-3/2}~#|nf{-5/2} 
MOMM1,MOME2$collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN, 2010Vi07). Value of |m=-0.2164 in 2010Vi07 is evaluated to -0.2166 in 2019StZV. Value of Q=+0.072 in 2010Vi07 is evaluated to +0.075 in 2016St04 and 2021StZZ. Other: |m=-0.217 {I2} (1966Do01,1963Do02, atomic-beam method) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+64}Cu)=-0.09 fm{+2} {I1}(stat) {I2}(syst) (2020De21, collinear resonance ionization laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+64}Cu)=-0.116 fm{+2} {I3}(stat) {I13}(syst) (2016Bi08, collinear resonance ionization laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN) 
T$weighted average of 12.6975 h {I36} (2018Ab02, statistical uncertainty=0.0005 h, systematic uncertainty=0.0036 h, ionization chamber); 12.706 h {I5} (2017Pi09, weighted average of four different measurements: 12.707 h {I19} using a well counter for gamma radiation, 12.700 h {I18} from decay curve for 511-keV radiation using HPGe detector, 12.712 h {I14} and 12.706 h {I5} using two different ionization chambers); 12.718 h {I23} (2012Am05, liquid scintillation counting); 12.696 h {I12} (2012Lu14, ionization chamber, value also cited in 2012Be24); 12.702 h {I8} (2012Be24, measurement made at NPL, Teddington, using an ionization chamber); 12.704 h {I5} (2010Wa46, ionization chamber, value also cited in 2012Be24); 12.694 h {I28} (2008Fa12, weighted average of 12.675 h {I33} at 293 K and 12.708 h {I23} at 12K, 511-radiation counting using HPGe detector); 12.700 h {I5} (1989Ab22, |g decay, uncertainty of 0.001 h in 1989Ab22 increased by evaluators); 12.701 h {I3} (1982RuZV,1980RuZY, ionization chamber, earlier value of 12.701 h {I7} in 1972MeZM from the same lab); 12.704 h {I6} (1974Ry01, 4|p|b counter); 12.699 h {I2} (1973De56); 12.72 h {I1} (1972Em01, weighted average of 12.71 h {I1}, 12.72 h {I2}, 12.72 h {I4} using NaI(Tl) detector and ionization chamber, also 1972WyZZ and 12.78 h {I5} in 1957Wr37); 12.701 h {I11} (1968He20, average of three measurements: 12.695 h {I20}, 12.702 h {I15}, 12.709 h {I15}, 511-radiation counting). Weighted average of all the values, including the 19 values, with less precision, listed below is 12.702 h {I3} with reduced |h{+2}=4.7 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.5 at 95% confidence level. With small adjustment in uncertainties of a few of the less precise values, NMR weighted average gives 12.702 h {I2}, with reduced |h{+2}=2.5, and RT weighted average gives 12.701 {I2} with reduced |h{+2}=1.7 
$T{-1/2} articles not seen: 1973De56, 1968Ke12, 1967Vi08, 1966Li09, 1951Hi88 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q), |g(lin pol) in (p,n|g); |g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on polarized {+63}Cu; L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-; L({+3}He,t)=0 and Gamow-Teller transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) in (p,n|g); L(d,p)=1+3 from 3/2-; L({+3}He,p)=2. However, primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV is inconsistent with 3+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g) give J=2,4; L(d,|a)=4 and L({+3}He,p) from 0+ gives (3+,4+,5+); parity from L(d,p)=3 from 3/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on pol {+63}Cu and |g(|q), |g(lin pol) in (p,n|g); parity from L(d,p)=1 from 3/2- and L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; L(d,t)=1+3 from 3/2- for 573+606 unresolved group 
T$>0.12 ps (DSAM in (p,n|g) (1974Ca14)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=1 from |g(|q), |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g) and |g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on polarized {+63}Cu; parity from L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-, L({+3}He,t)=0+2 from 0+, L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+. Other: L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ for a 661 group inconsistent with J=1 
T$>0.12 ps (DSAM in (p,n|g) (1974Ca14)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
E$probably a doublet (739+746) in particle-transfer reactions 
J$spin from |g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on pol {+63}Cu and |g(|q) in (p,n|g); parity from L(d,p)=1 from 3/2- for 739+746 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q), |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g); L(d,t)=1 from 3/2- for the 739+746 doublet; L({+3}He,p)=2+4 for a 745 {I10} group; L(d,|a)=2(+4) for a 742 {I4} group. A primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV is inconsistent with 3+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in (p,n|g) strongly supports spin 0. Parity from L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-. L({+3}He,p)=2 giving (1+,2+,3+) and primary |g from 2- in (n,|g) E=0.579 keV are inconsistent with J=0 assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) in (p,n|g) and L(d,p)=1+3 from 3/2-. However, primary transition from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV is inconsistent with 3+ 
$Cautionary note: 617|g is the only transition from the 895 level seen in all the |g-ray studies where this level is populated, for example, (n,|g) E=Th; (p,n|g); ({+7}Li,pn|g); (|a,pn|g); and other reactions. The next common transition is 321 keV, seen in several studies but with different intensities, while not reported in (p,n|g). For the other transitions shown here from this level, there are major differences about their observations and intensities, as noted in comments in the |g-ray Table. It is possible there are two or more levels near 895 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on pol {+63}Cu; |g(|q), |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g) and L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-; L({+3}He,t)=L(d,{+2}He)=0; L({+3}He,p)=0+2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+),2(+)
level_comment:
$Probably a doublet (1241+1243) in particle transfer reactions and (n,|g) E=res 
J$|g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on pol {+63}Cu; L(d,p)=1 from 3/2- for a 1236 group; L({+3}He,p)=0 for a 1241 group gives 0+,1+. J|p=3+ assigned by 2018Sa02 in ({+7}Li,pn|g) without any supporting evidence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) in (pol n,|g); L(d,|a)=0+2 from 0+; L(d,t)=L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-; L({+3}He,p)=0; L({+3}He,t)=0 and Gamow-Teller transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$|g to 1+ (g.s.); L(d,p)=1+3 from 3/2-; L(d,|a)=4 from 0+; L({+3}He,p)=2 for 1359 group which overlaps 1354 and 1363 levels suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of these two levels. J|p=4+ proposed in ({+7}Li,pn|g) inconsistent with |g to 1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
E$possible doublet in (d,p) and (d,|a) 
J$L(d,p)=0+4 from 3/2-; L(d,|a)=(3) from 0+. J|p=4- assigned in ({+7}Li,pn|g) without supporting arguments. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+,3+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 2+; L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+. But L(d,p)=4 from 3/2- (for a possible doublet) is inconsistent with positive parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$DPAD method in (d,p|g) (1972Bl16). Other: +1.02 {I6} (from (|a,pn|g), 1971SuZR). 
J$|g(|q) in (|a,pn|g). L(|a,d)=5 for a 1590 group and agreement of |s(|q) with DWBA calculations for configuration=|pp{-3/2}~#|ng{-9/2} 
T$weighted average of 22 ns {I3} ({+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g), 1997Is13 (also 2001Is02)); 19 ns {I2} (|g(t) in (|a,pn|g)), 1976Ch36); 20.4 ns {I7} (|g(t) in (d,p|g), 1972Bl16) and 20.4 ns {I6} (|g(t) in (|a,pn|g), 1971SuZR). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2)
level_comment:
J$primary |gs from 1- and 2- in (n,|g) E=2, 2.66 keV; |gs to 1+, 3+. L(d,p)=4 from 3/2- for a doublet suggests |p=- for one component. L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ for a 1589 group is inconsistent with J=1,2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 2- in (n,|g) E=2.66 keV; 1032.7|g to 4+, 998.0|g to 2+. L(d,|a)=0(+2) from 0+ suggests 1+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_comment:
J$possible |gs to (3+) and (0)+. L(d,p)=0(+2,3) from 3/2- and L(d,|a)=(0+2,1) suggest two levels near this energy with J|p=1-,2- and J|p=1+; L({+3}He,p)=2 for a 1689 group which overlaps 1683 and 1700 levels suggests positive parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (0)+, but L(d,p)=2+4 from 3/2- and L(d,|a)=(3) from 0+ suggest 2-,3-,4-; L({+3}He,p)=2 for a 1689 group which overlaps 1683 and 1700 levels suggests positive parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ for a group at 1737 {I10} and 1165.2|g to (4)+ limits J|p to be (3+,4+,5+); 1293.9|g from the 3033.6 level with J|p limited to (0,1,2)- from other evidence. See J|p comment for 3033.6 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2,3+)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 1+ and (3)+; L({+3}He,p)=2 for 1741+1775 doublet suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of the five levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_comment:
J$primary |gs from 1- and 2- in (n,|g) E=0.577, 2 keV; |gs to 1+ and 3+; L(d,p)=3(+1) from 3/2-. See J|p comment for 1768 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_comment:
J$primary |gs from 1- and 2- in (n,|g) E=0.577, 2 keV; |g to 1+ and L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-; L({+3}He,p)=2. L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ disagrees with J=1,2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=(0+2) from 0+; L(d,p)=1 from 3/2- for a group at 1900 {I8}; L({+3}He,p)=2(+0) for a group at 1907 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2,3-)
level_comment:
J$primary |gs from 1- and 2- in (n,|g) E=0.577, 2 keV and |g to (3+). L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ and L(d,p)=(0,1) for a 2050 group suggest positive parity for one of two levels near 2050 keV. See J|p comment for 2041 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, (M1+E2) |g to 6-. 1976Ch36 assigned 5-, assuming the level corresponds to L(d,p)=4 group. But L(d,|a)=3 group suggests the level may also correspond to 2075 level populated in (n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV and |gs to 1+, 4+. L(d,|a)=4(+2) from 0+ suggests 3+. L(d,p)=1 from 3/2- agrees with 2+. L({+3}He,p)=2 for 2146 group suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of the two levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 2280+2301 levels and Gamow-Teller transitions. Also L({+3}He,p)=2 for 2290 level suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of the two levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 2280+2301 levels and Gamow-Teller transitions. See also comment for 2279.8 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (LE 3)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 1-,2- in (n,|g) E=th; 1119|g to 1(+),2(+) L({+3}He,p)=2 for 2369 group suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of the three levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5,6+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 4+, and yrast pattern of population in ({+7}Li,pn|g) reaction. See also comments for 2417 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+,3+)
level_comment:
E$triplet in (d,|a) 
J$|g to 1+; L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ for a group at 2414 {I10}. But L(d,p)=0+4 from 3/2- suggests 2- for a questionable level at 2415 {I10}; L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ suggests 3+,4+,5+ for a group at 2415 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV; |g to 1+ and L(d,p)=0+2 from 3/2-. Also L(d,|a)=(1) from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+,1,2,3+)
level_comment:
J$2332|g to 2+, 2491|g to 1+. L(d,p)=2 from 3/2- and L(d,|a)=3 from 0+ for a group at 2494 {I9} suggest 2-,3-,4- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3+)
level_comment:
J$1830.3|g to 1+, 1918.7|g to 4+. But L(d,|a)=3 from 0+ and L(d,p)=2 from 3/2- give (2-,3-,4-) for a 2494 {I9}, which could indicate a different level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=(0+2) from 0+ suggests (1+) and L(d,p)=(0) from 3/2- suggests (1-,2-). See comment for 2507 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=(0+2) supports (1+) for a questionable level at 2534 {I10}, whereas, L(d,p)=0(+2) from 3/2- for a group at 2534 {I10} suggests 1-, 2-; 192.5|g from 2726, (3+) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=(0+2) from 0+. L({+3}He,p)=2 for a 2608 group suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of the three levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ and L(d,p)=0 from 3/2- for doublets suggest J|p=3+,4+,5+ and J|p=1-, 2-. See J|p comment for 2594 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (LE 3+)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 1-,2- in (n,|g) E=th and |g to (1+). L(d,|a)=0(+2) from 0+ and L(d,p)=2(+0,1) from 3/2- suggest (for doublets) J|p=1+ and J|p=0- to 4- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=L(d,{+2}He)=0. But L(d,p)=4(+0) from 3/2- for a doublet suggests |p=- for one of the levels; 1+,2- from (d,{+2}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=0 from 3/2-. L(d,|a)=(3+1) from 0+ favors 2-. L({+3}He,p)=2 for a 2679 group suggests 1+,2+,3+; 1+,2- from (d,{+2}He). There may be two levels near this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; 957|g to (5+), 1428|g to (1)+; primary |gs from 1-,2- in (n,|g) E=th. But primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV is inconsistent with (3)+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_comment:
J$primary |gs from 2- and 1- in (n,|g) E=0.577, 2.06 keV; |gs to 1+ and (3)+; L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-; 1+,2- from (d,{+2}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=0 from 3/2-. Others: L(d,|a)=(0+2) from 0+ suggesting 1+ and L({+3}He,p)=0 for 2801+2827 suggesting 0+,1+ for this doublet are inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2,3+)
level_comment:
J$1476|g to (3)+, 2830|g to 1+. Others: L(d,p)=0+2 from 3/2- for a doublet suggests 1-, 2-. L(d,|a)=(2,3) from 0+ for a doublet suggests J|p=1+,2+,3+ or 3-,4-,5-; L({+3}He,p)=0 for 2801+2827 suggests 0+,1+ for this doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+,1+
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+; L(d,p)=1 from 3/2- for a doublet. L(d,|a)=(3) from 0+ for a doublet suggesting 3-,4-,5- is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2907 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2913 {I11} from (d,p), 2905 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 2913 {I11} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+; L(d,p)=1 from 3/2-; L(d,|a)=(0+2) from 0+; L({+3}He,p)=(0+2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV and L(d,p)=2 from 3/2- gives J|p=(0-,1-,2-); 1293.9|g to the 1740 level with J|p limited to (3+,4+,5+) by L(d,|a)=4 from 0+. J|p(3033.6)=(2-) then further limits J|p(1740) to be (3+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$binned data from 3.0 to 3.25 MeV. Gamow-Teller transition from 0+ g.s. of {+64}Zn in ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=L(d,{+2}He)=0; L({+3}He,p)=2. Others: L(d,p)=0 from 3/2- for 3192+3233 suggesting negative parity is inconsistent; L(d,{+2}He)=0, Gamow-Teller transition in (d,{+2}He), (t,{+3}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0,1,2)
level_comment:
J$|g to 1+; primary |g from 1- in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV; L(d,p)=0 from 3/2- for 3290+3311 suggests J|p=1-,2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1,2,3-)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 for 3472+3513 suggests 1+,2+,3+ for any of the five levels in the range 3465-3524; |g to (2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+,1,2)
level_comment:
J$|g to 1+ and 2+. L(d,p)=2 from 3/2- for a triplet suggests 0 to 4-. See J|p comment for 3465 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
J$primary |gs from 2- and 1- in (n,|g) E=0.579 and 2.038 keV; |gs to 1+ and 2+. See J|p comment for 3465 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2+)
level_comment:
J$2724.8|g to (0)+. L(d,p)=2 from 3/2- for 3604+3623 suggests 0 to 4-. L({+3}He,p)=1 for a 3607 group suggests 0-,1-,2- for any of the two levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2+)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 2+ and (0)+; primary |g in (n,|g) E=2.038 keV. L(d,p)=(0) from 3/2- for 3763+3791 suggests 1-,2- for one level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
E$energy is consistent with 3798 level from (|a,pn|g) and ({+7}Li,pn|g), but J|p assignment from (|a,d) is in disagreement with (9-) from in-beam |g-ray work 
J$L(|a,d)=8 for a 3790 group and agreement of |s(|q) with DWBA calculations for configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ng{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+,1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 3804+3827 levels; L({+3}He,p)=2 for a group at 3802 {I10} suggests (1+,2+,3+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 3966+3995+4031+4063+4101+4136 levels, and Gamow-Teller transition for 3966 level. Also L({+3}He,p)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 3966+3995+4031+4063+4101+4136 levels, and Gamow-Teller transition for 3966 level; |g to 3+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=2; |g to 1+; L({+6}Li,{+6}He) from 0+ for 4039+3998; L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 3966+3995+4031+4063+4101+4136 levels. But L(d,p)=2 from 3/2- suggests |p=- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 3966+3995+4031+4063+4101+4136 levels, and Gamow-Teller transition for 4063 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-,2-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 1+; L(d,p)=2 from 3/2-; L({+3}He,p)=1. L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 3966+3995+4031+4063+4101+4136 levels suggests (0+,1+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
J$possible configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|nd{-5/2} or configuration=|pd{-5/2}~#|ng{-9/2} and systematics of population in (|a,d) (1994Fi01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 4599+4630 levels, and Gamow-Teller transitions for both the levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+,1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0 for composite of 4877+4916+4957+5000+5030+5053+5116 levels; and 5053 level interpreted as Gamow-Teller transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$6810 and 6826 form a doublet in ({+3}He,t) with L=0 
J$component of IAS of {+64}Ni g.s.; L({+3}He,t)=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$6810 and 6826 form a doublet in ({+3}He,t) with L=0 
J$component of IAS of {+64}Ni g.s.; L({+3}He,p)=0; L({+3}He,t)=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2-
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$S(n)=7915.868 {I24} (2021Wa16) 
$S(n)=7915.867 {I24} (2016Te05, measured from energy of primary ground state transition. 
J$s-wave capture in {+63}Cu (g.s. J|p=3/2-). From |g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on oriented {+63}Cu, J=1 fraction determined as 94% {I2} (1983De28). From |g(circ pol), J=1 fraction >92% (1973Ko16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
E$resonance state with S(n)+E(n), where E(n)(lab)=0.579 keV {I1} (2018MuZY), S(n)=7915.868 {I24} (2021Wa16) 
J$from 2018MuZY 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$resonance state with S(n)+E(n), where E(n)(lab)=2.038 keV {I3} (2018MuZY), S(n)=7916.868 {I24} (2021Wa16) 
J$from 2018MuZY 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
E$resonance state with S(n)+E(n), where E(n)(lab)=2.642 keV {I4} (2018MuZY), S(n)=7916.868 {I24} (2021Wa16) 
J$from 2018MuZY 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3+)
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$resonance state with S(n)+E(n), where E(n)(lab)=24 keV, S(n)=7916.868 {I24} (2021Wa16) 
J$s- or p-wave capture in {+63}Cu g.s., J|p=3/2-; |g to (0)+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
J$1969Lu07 assigned 9+ to this group based on large cross section, but |s(|q) data and DWBA calculations by 1994Fi01 support 7+ with configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|nd{-5/2} or configuration=|pd{-5/2}~#|ng{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2-
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$S(n)=7916.868 {I24} (2021Wa16) 
$S(n)=7915.867 {I24} (2016Te05, measured from energy of primary ground state transition. 
J$s-wave capture in {+63}Cu (g.s. J|p=3/2-). From |g(|q) in (pol n,|g) on oriented {+63}Cu, J=1 fraction determined as 94% {I2} (1983De28). From |g(circ pol), J=1 fraction >92% (1973Ko16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+),2(+)
level_comment:
E$doublet of levels (1240.5 and 1242.6) proposed on the basis of energy sums (1972Bl16). See also (n,|g) data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$g factor based on g=+1.442 {I3} for 5/2+ level of {+19}F 
T$from |g(t) (1972Bl16) 
J$from |g(|q), g factor and T{-1/2}(level) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1+ suggested in Fig. 1 of 2009Po07, (1+) in Fig. 2 of 2008Gr10. L=0 is assigned in 2009Po07 for a group of seven levels between 4877 and 5116. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$broad peak at 200-600 keV consists of several unresolved levels including the 344, 1+ level 
$d|s/d|W=0.17 mb/sr {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$weak cross section did not allow J|p assignment, angular distribution shows contribution from 2- 
$d|s/d|W=0.044 mb/sr {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$binned data from 3.0 to 3.25 MeV (2009Hi08) 
L,J$from 2009Hi08, weak presence of 2+ as in authors' Fig. 2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 12.700 h {I18} from 511|g(t), 12.707 h {I19} from well counter measurement, and 12.712 h {I14} and 12.706 h {I5} from ionization chamber measurements (2017Pi09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
MOMM1 Nuclear magnetic resonance (1978Lu08,1989Ra17,2004St24). 
MOMM1 Other value: +2.387 {I7} Resonance cell laser spectroscopy (2009Co14). 
MOME2 Optical spectroscopy (1972St38,1989Ra17,2004St24). 
Isotope shift (1998Da11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 99 fs {I5}, from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'); 95 fs {I18}, from Coulomb Excitation; and 110 fs {I6}, from {+65}Cu(n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 0.285 ps {I9}, from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'), 0.30 ps {I4}, from Coulomb Excitation, and 0.280 ps {I7}, from {+65}Cu(n.n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 0.42 ps {I12}, from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'); 0.41 ps {I8}, from Coulomb Excitation; and 0.4 ps {I3}, from {+65}Cu(n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 116 fs {I15}, from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'); 68 fs {I+28-16}, from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g), and 120 fs {I+80-40}, from {+65}Cu(n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,5/2-)
level_comment:
E |g-decay modes in {+65}Cu(p,p'|g), {+64}Ni(p,|g) and {+65}Cu(n,n'|g) are all different indicating a possible multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E 3163 {I3} from the least-squares fit to E|g data. 
T T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=5.5 fs {I6} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2+)
level_comment:
T T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=16 fs {I3} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 
E doublet indicated by L(t,|a)=1 and J|p=(1/2+,3/2+) in {+64}Ni(p,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E 3892 {I4} from the least-squares fit to E|g data. 
T From T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=8.6 fs {I13} in {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E weighted average of 3923 {I3} from {+64}Ni(p,|g), 3923 {I4} from {+65}Cu(n,n'|g) and 3926 {I2} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g') 
T T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=5.9 fs {I6} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E 3955 {I4} from the least-squares fit to E|g data. 
T T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=3.8 fs {I4} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2,5/2+)
level_comment:
E 4054 {I3} from the least-squares fit to E|g data. 
T T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=2.38 fs {I25} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E 4275 {I4} from the least-squares fit to E|g data. 
T T{-1/2}/(2J+1)=3.8 fs {I7} from {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E resonance at E(lab)=3172 {I10}; IAS of {+65}Ni(g.s.). In {+64}Ni({+3}He,d) reaction, 5 levels from 10750 {I40} to 13090 {I40} have been seen and assigned as IAS of various levels in {+65}Ni. However, because of the poor resolution, it is not possible to establish a one-to-one correspondence between these levels and those seen in the {+64}Ni(p,p), (p,p'), (p,n), IAR reaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
An L=2+4 doublet at 3800 {I50} was reported in 1965Bl14. The L=2 component has been identified as the 3768 level (1976Br36). The data for this component are from 1965Bl14. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
IAS of {+65}Ni g.s., J|p=5/2- and E(level)=63, J|p=1/2-; the corresponding C{+2}S' are 2.5|?and 1.4|?. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
IAS of {+65}Ni E(level)=2336, J|p=5/2- and the possible level with E(level)|?2330, J|p=9/2+; the corresponding C{+2}S' are |?0.6 and |?1.1, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
|G=4.6|*10{+-3} eV {I2}. Weighted mean of 4.8|*10{+-3} eV {I6} (1971ImZY), 4.8|*10{+-3} eV {I4} (1972ArZD) and 4.36|*10{+-3} eV {I26} (from g|G(0)=2.18|*10{+-3} eV 13, 1981Ca10). Others: 4.6|*10{+-3} eV {I14} (1969Ru01), 5.1|*10{+-3} eV {I24} (1972Wh08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
|G=1.60|*10{+-3} eV {I5}. Weighted mean of 1.73|*10{+-3} eV {I10} (1968Me09), 1.63|*10{+-3} eV {I9} (1972ArZD), 1.54|*10{+-3} eV {I6} (1979DaZC) and 1.65|*10{+-3} eV {I19} (from g|G(0)=2.47|*10{+-3} eV {I28}, 1981Ca10). Others: 1.0|*10{+-3} eV {I3} (1963Ka29), 1.5|*10{+-3} eV {I4} (1964Be21), 1.8|*10{+-3} eV {I2} (1970Ka34), 1.0|*10{+-3} eV {I10} (1972Wh08), 1.9|*10{+-3} eV {I7} (1973Ko31). 
J from |g(|q) data of 1964Be21, 1968Me09. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
|G=1.1|*10{+-3} eV {I3}. Unweighted mean of 1.349|*10{+-3} eV {I14} (from g|G(0){+2}/|G=1.95|*10{+-3} eV {I2}, 1976Sw01) and 0.83|*10{+-3} eV {I14} (from gw(|q)|G(0){+2}/|G=1.13|*10{+-3} eV {I19}, 1981Ca10). Other: >0.11|*10{+-3} eV (1972Wh08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
g|G(0){+2}/|G=2.9|*10{+-3} eV {I3} (1976Sw01). 
J |g(|q) data rule out J=1/2 (1976Sw01, L=1 for p stripping and pickup assumed). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
g|G(0){+2}/|G<0.24|*10{+-3} eV (1976Sw01). 
E from adopted levels. 
T{-1/2}/(2J+1): adopted |g branching=0.022 {I8}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
g|G(0){+2}/|G=6.5|*10{+-3} eV {I7} (1976Sw01). 
J |g(|q) data rule out J=1/2 (1976Sw01, L=1 for p stripping and pickup assumed). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E|g-E(res)=9.3 eV {I8} (1967Gi15). 
|G=0.63 eV {I24}. Weighted mean of 0.67 eV {I35} (1967Gi15) and 0.59 eV {I33} (1971Be22). 
E from 1967Gi15, uncertainty not available. 
J from |g(|q) data of 1967Gi15. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E|g-E(res)=11.2 eV {I8} (1974Wo05). 
|G=0.07 eV {I+6-2} (1974Wo05). 
E from 1974Wo05, uncertainty not available. 
J from |g(|q) data of 1974Wo05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E|g-E(res)=9.4 eV {I7} (1967Gi15). 
|G=0.33 eV {I3}; |G(0)/|G=0.90 {I5} (1975MoYT). Other widths (corrected for |G(0)/|G=0.90 {I5}): 1.0 eV {I4} (1967Gi15), 0.52 eV {I12} (1971Be22). 
J (1/2) from |g(|q) and |g-linear polarization data of 1975MoYT. J=(1/2) from |g(|q) data of 1967Gi15 but J=(5/2) favored from |g(|q) data of 1971Ol03. 
T 1.38 fs {I13} from |G. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Spectral peak comprises population to the 2526-(9/2+), 2533-(1/2-,3/2-,5/2-), and 2534-(7/2+,9/2+) keV levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
|g(|q) (1964El03,1964Ro10) reported to be consistent with J=1/2 
T weighted mean of DSA measurements 90 fs {I25} (1965Es01) and 100 fs {I26} (1977Do16). 
B(E2): weighted mean of 0.0087 {I13} (1956Te26), 0.010 {I2} (1962Er05), 0.0102 {I11} (1964Ro10), and 0.0100 {I5} (1998Si25). Other: 0.0078, uncertainty not available (1964El03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T weighted mean of 0.37 ps {I7} (1965Es01) from DSA and 0.26 ps {I5} from B(E2) and adopted |d(1115|g). Other: 0.55 ps {I10} (1977Do16) 
B(E2): weighted mean of 0.027 {I4} (1956Te26), 0.028 {I5} (1962Er05), 0.035 {I4} (1964Ro10), and 0.0306 {21} (1998Si25). Other: 0.026 {I1} includes only relative uncertainty (1964El03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J=7/2 from {+16}O-|g(|q) (1964El03) 
T weighted mean of 0.36 ps {I7} (from B(E2)|^) and 0.53 ps {I11} (by DSA, 1965Es01). 
B(E2)|^: weighted mean of 0.034 {I6} (1962Er05) and 0.043 {I8} (1964Ro10). Other: 0.030 {I1} (1964El03) includes only relative uncertainty. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$ Hyperfine structure parameters measured in 2010Vi07 and found in agreement with those in literature 
J$ spin measured in 2010Vi07, parity from comparison of level energies, with shell-model calculations. 
$ Dominant |pp{-3/2} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t), fast timing technique (2014Bo12) 
$Level interpreted by 2014Bo12 as member of |pp3/2~#3- multiplet; 3- is octupole phonon state in {+64}Ni 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T unweighted average of 5.05 min {I5} (1946Me01), 5.18 min {I10} (1950Ca01), 5.2 min {I1} (1951Fr19), 5.17 min {I7} (1951Ro22), 5.12 min {I5} (1951Sc56), 5.07 min {I2} (1953Ba48), 5.10 min {I2} (1953Sa11), 5.20 min {I5} (1954Ko07), 5.1 min {I1} (1974Ar22), 5.13 min {I3} (1974Ry01), 5.10 min {I2} (1989Ab18), 5.063 min {I20} (1990KaZW), 5.080 min {I12} (1992KaZM). Others: 5.3 min 1 (1965Bo42), 5.40 min (1989Ah03). 
MOMM1 From atomic-beam magnetic resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from delayed |g|g coincidences in {+65}Cu(d,p|g) 
MOMM1 From differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays in {+65}Cu(d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3)
level_comment:
J$from primary |g in thermal-neutron capture assumed to be dipole to this level and |g's to 2+,3+,4+ levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E the level mainly populated in this reaction probably corresponds to the level observed at 1017.1 {I2} in thermal {+65}Cu(n,|g) (1969Da09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from measurement of delayed-|g|g coincidences. 
G From measurement of |g(|q,H,t), uncorrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
E observed in {+64}Ni(|a,d) (1980TsZW,1980TsZV) level reported at 1200 {I100} (1961Sa09) 
J (6-) favored from excitation modes of (|a,d) reactions and systematics of Cu isotopes (1980TsZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
E 3700 (1980TsZW) with an uncertainty of |?200 keV as estimated by the evaluator 
J (9+) favored from excitation modes of (|a,d) reactions and systematics of Cu isotopes (1980TsZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$ spin measured in 2010Vi07, parity from comparison of level energies, g factors and quadrupole moments with shell-model calculations. 
$ |pp{-3/2}~#|n(p{-1/2},f{-5/2},p{-3/2}) mixed configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 89|g+186|g+316|g+563|g(t) in 2011Lo01 
MOME2$ deduced from electric field gradient V{-zz} determined from quadrupole frequencies and known static quadrupole moments in {+63}Cu and {+65}Cu. Same value is obtained from weighted average of Q{-s}=0.187 eb {I12} and 0.186 eb {I11}, values deduced relative to measured quadrupole frequencies and known Q{-s}=-0.212 eb {I4} and -0.195 eb {I4} for the 3/2- ground states of {+63}Cu and {+65}Cu, respectively. Sign of Q is not determined. 
CONF$|p3/2[312] (p{-3/2})~#|n9/2[404] (g{-9/2}); oblate deformation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J L(t,p)=0 
T weighted average of 61.88 h {I14} (1968Re04), 61.00 h {I25} (1970Ma56), 61.83 h {I7} (1972La14), 62.01 h {I14} (1974Ro18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$ spin measured in 2010Vi07, parity from comparison of level energies, g factors and quadrupole moments with shell-model calculations. 
$ Dominant |pp{-3/2} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$measured through collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). 
T$weighted average of 32 s {I2} (1953Fl10), 30 s {I1} (1964Ba13), 31.6 s {I10} (1969Va16), 30 s {I3} (1971Si19), and 30 s {I3} (1974Ar22). 
MOMM1$Collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). Other: +2.48 {I8} (2002We03). 
MOME2$Collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). 
$%|b{+-}=100. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) in {+68}Cu IT decay. 
J$the 637|g-84|g cascade from 6- to 1+, along with T{-1/2} of the 6- level and mult(84|g)=D, is consistent only with J|p(84 level)=2+, mult(84|g)=M1, and mult(637|g)=M4. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) in {+68}Cu IT decay. 
J$the 110|g-610|g cascade from 6- to 1+, along with mult(110|g)=E3 or M3 and T{-1/2} of the 610 level, is consistent only with J|p(610 level)=3+, mult(610|g)=E2 and mult(110|g)=E3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$measured through collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). 
T$from |g(t) in {+68}Cu IT decay (1971Si19). Others: 3.8 min {I1} (1969Wa22), 3.8 min {I1} (1974Ar22). 
MOMM1$Collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). Other: +1.24 {I8} (2002We03). 
MOME2$Collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). 
$%IT=86 {I2}, %|b{+-}=14 {I2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g). Symmetrized from 0.7 ns<T{-1/2}<4 ns. 
J$693|g to 2+, 179|g from 4-, and member of |p2p{-3/2}|n1g{-9/2} multiplet from large |s in {+68}Zn(t,{+3}He). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
T$Expected to be on the order of ps, based on observation of Doppler broadened lineshape of 179|g (2007St03). 
$B(E2; 721(6-) to 956(4-))=0.0068 {I6} (2007St03). 
J$Coulomb excitation from 6- isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) in 2003Ho31 
J$E2 610|g to 1+. 1975Ti01 and 1972Sw01 assign the level as 3- and the 610|g as M2, however, this is excluded by RUL. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in 1971Si19. Others: 3.8 min {I1} (1969Wa22), 3.8 min {I1} (1974Ar22). 
$%IT=86 {I2}, %|b{+-}=14 {I2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
$B(E2; 722(6{+-}) to 956(4{+-}))=0.0068 {I6}. 
T$expected to be on the order of ps based on observed Doppler broadened lineshape of 178|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6
level_comment:
J$from 2020De21 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu, {+68}Cu)=0.17 fm{+2} {I1} (stat) {I3} (syst) 
E$from the Adopted Levels of {+68}Cu in the ENSDF database (March 2012 update). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$ measured from hyperfine spectra (2010Vi07), |p confirmed from (pol t,|a) and (d,{+3}He) 
MOMM1, MOME2$ from resonance cell laser spectroscopy. Compiled by 2011StZZ. Other: +2.84 {I1} NMR on oriented nuclei with |b detection (2000Ri14) 
T$weighted average of 2.7 m {I1} (1985Ru05) and 3.0 m {I1} (1966Va12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$ from {+70}Zn(pol t,|a) differential cross section and analyzing powers 
T$Deduced by evaluators from experimental B(E2)(W.u.)(2008St04) in Coulomb Excitation and adopted branching ratio 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Deduced by evaluators from experimental B(E2)(W.u.)(2008St04) in Coulomb Excitation and adopted branching ratio 
J$ L(d,{+3}He)=3 for 0+ target 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Deduced by evaluators from experimental B(E2)(W.u.)(2008St04) Coulomb Excitation and adopted branching ratio 
J$band member; (E2) 1870 |g to 3/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from g factor =0.225 {I25} measured using the Time Dependant Perturbed Distribution in combination with heavy ion gamma correlation technique (2002Ge16). Compiled by 2011StZZ. 
J$74 |g to 11/2- and 189.9 |g to (9/2+) 
T$From (HI,xn|g) in 2002Ge16. Others: 360 ns {i20} (2012Di03), 330 ns {I80} (1999BrZS), 0.36 |ms {I5} (1998Gr14), and 360 ns {I30} (1997Is13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$ position of g.s. peak gives Q=-5605 keV 10 from mass excess of -65750 keV 10 for {+69}Cu from 1978Ze04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$systematics suggest that this possible doublet state may be 5/2- and 7/2-. |s(|q) cannot differentiate between these two; analyzing power data are not in agreement with either value though 5/2- appears more likely. 
E$probable doublet with the spacing of the two unresolved levels estimated to be less than 15 keV by 1981Aj02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$the analyzing power data are in fairly good agreement with shape but not with absolute values predicted for J|p=7/2- level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From 2002Ge16. Others: 360 ns {I20} (2012Di03), 330 ns {I80} (1999BrZS), 0.36 |ms {I5} (1998Gr14), and 360 ns {I30} (1997Is13) 
$Configuration=|p|n|n{+-1} 
G$measured using the Time Dependant Perturbed Distribution in combination with heavy ion gamma correlation technique (2002Ge16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2)-
level_comment:
J$ For 5/2-, one expects log {If{+1u}t}>8.5 with |b- feeding <1 %. Limit of |b- feeding by author could be accounted for by the existence of high energy |g's that have escaped detection 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$ measured from hyperfine spectra, parity from comparison of level energies 
$ Dominant |p2p{-3/2} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$Authors (2016Mo21) suggest this level is not a doublet based on the smaller value of the spectroscopic factor as compared to previous work by Zeidman and Nolen (1978Ze04: Phys.Rev. C18, 2122 (1978)) who suggests the level is a doublet. In addition there is no evidence of a broader peak at 1.23 MeV, as all peaks have an average width |s=18 keV {I2} 
T$0.90 {I13} with r{-0}=1.20 fm and a{-0}=0.70 fm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$Adopted levels of {+69}Cu in ENSDF adopts (5/2, 7/2)- for this state but 2016Ku11 eliminates (7/2)- based on the multipolarity of 1216.6|g deduced using the observed phase difference of oscillations between the L=2 and L=1 transitions in R(t) spectra. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from the time difference between the implantation and correlated |g-transitions in 2016Ku11. All the observed |g-ray transitions below the isomer were summed to produce the decay curve. The quoted uncertainty is statistical only. 
G$using TDPAD method in 2016Ku11. Experimental R(t) function was fitted by the theoretical curve and |h{+2}-minimization was applied. The uncertainty quoted includes the statistical uncertainty {I8} and the systematic uncertainty {I5} due to the variation of the magnetic field at the target position. The authors of 2016Ku11 stated that the sign of the g-factor was determined from the sign dependence of the nuclear spin alignment as a function of the momentum distribution and the E2 character of 189.7|g. The + sign is also in agreement with the Shell Model calculations. Please note that the g-factor of this state was measured using the same technique but in different reaction in 2002Ge16. 
$Shell model calculations give g{+free}=+0.261 and g{+eff}=+0.226 using JUN45 interaction and g{+free}=+0.274 and g{+eff}=+0.236 using jj44b interaction. The wave function of the state is dominated by |pp{+1}{-3/2}~#|np{+1}{-1/2}g{+1}{-9/2} and |pp{+1}{-3/2}~#|nf{+4}{-5/2}p{+1}{-1/2}g{+3}{-9/2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 
T$from |b(t); a three component exponential decay was used to account for the 6- ground state, 1+ 243-keV isomer and a constant background (2004Va08). Others: 42 s {I7} (1999Pr10), 52 s {I4} (1975Re09), 42 s {I3} (1971Ta03). 
MOMM1$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). Other: (+)1.50 {I11} from LASER spectroscopy (2002We03). 
MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 
T$from |g(t) of the 209|g, 387|g, 553|g and 708|g from the 3247-keV level in {+70}Zn (2004Va08). 
%B-,%IT$from 2004Va07,2004Va08 
MOMM1$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). Other: (-)3.50 {I12} from LASER spectroscopy (2002We03). 
MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 
E$confirmed in high-precision mass measurement where 100.7 keV {I26} was deduced (2004Va07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
J$Coulomb excitation from 6- ground state; member of ((|p 2p{-3/2})(|n 1g{-9/2})) multiplet 
$B(E2) (6- to 4-)=0.0069 {I9} (2011Ra42) 
$B(E2) (3- to 4-)=0.0073 {I10} (2011Ra42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 
T$from |b(t); a three component exponential decay was used to account for the 6- ground state, 1+ 243-keV isomer and a constant background (2004Va08). Others: 4 s {I1} (1975Re09) and 5 s {I1} (1971Ta03) 
%B-,%IT$from 2004Va07,2004Va08 
MOMM1$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07). Other: +1.86 {I4} from LASER spectroscopy (2002We03). 
MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$Coulomb excitation from 3- isomeric state; member of ((|p 2p{-3/2})(|n 1g{-9/2})) multiplet 
$B(E2) (6- to 5-)|< 0.0011 {I2} (2011Ra42). 
$B(E2) (3- to 5-)=0.0136 {I15} (2011Ra42). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from |b(t); a three component exponential decay was used to account for the 6- ground state, 1+ 243-keV isomer and a constant background (2004Va08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$high precision mass measurement in 2004Va07 gives 100.7 keV {I26} 
T$from |g(t) of the 209|g, 387|g, 553|g and 708|g from the 3247-keV level in {+70}Zn (2004Va08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3
level_comment:
J$from 2020De21 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu, {+70}Cu)=0.29 fm{+2} {I2} (stat) {I5} (syst) 
E$from the Adopted Levels of {+70}Cu in the ENSDF database (2016 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1
level_comment:
J$from 2020De21 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu, {+70}Cu)=0.32 fm{+2} {I2} (stat) {I5} (syst) 
E$from the Adopted Levels of {+70}Cu in the ENSDF database (2016 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Change in radius |d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+71}Cu)=+0.44 fm{+2} {I2}(stat) {I7}(syst). Isotope shift |d|n(|n{+71}Cu-|n{+65}Cu)=+2787 MHz {I4} (2020De21, ISOLDE-CERN, RILIS ion source and ISCOOL gas-filled linear Paul trap). See also review article 2017Ne04 about Collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN 
$Change in radius |d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+71}Cu)=+0.407 fm{+2} {I11}(stat) {I44} (syst). Isotope shift |d|n(|n{+71}Cu-|n{+65}Cu)=+1526.5 MHz {I91} (2016Bi08, ISOLDE-CERN, RILIS ion source and ISCOOL gas-filled linear Paul trap) 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy and collinear laser spectroscopy at CERN, ISOLDE facility (2009Fl03, 2010Vi07); measured value of +2.2747 {I8} is evaluated by 2019StZV to +2.2772 {I8}. Other: +2.28 {I1} from |b-NMR method on nuclei oriented at low temperatures (2008St01) is in agreement. See also 2011Go17 for analysis of magnetic moments from laser spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance frequencies from |b-NMR experiments; and 2017Ne04 review article 
MOME2$from in-source laser spectroscopy and collinear laser spectroscopy at CERN, ISOLDE facility (2010Vi07), measured value of -0.190 {I16} in this work is re-evaluated by 2016St14 to -0.200 {I17}. See also 2017Ne04 review article about Collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. 
J$from in-source laser spectroscopy and collinear laser spectroscopy at CERN, ISOLDE facility (2009Fl03, 2010Vi07). Negative parity is suggested by dominant |p2p{-3/2} orbital assignment from comparison of measured static magnetic and quadrupole moments with large-scale shell-model calculations (2010Vi07), as well as L(d,{+3}He)=1+3 from 0+ target for an unresolved level at 110 {I190} populated in {+2}H({+72}Zn,{+3}He) 
T$from timing of |g rays; weighted average of 19 s {I3} (1999Pr10) and 19.5 s {I16} (1983Ru06). 
$Configuration: |p2p{-3/2}{+1}~#|n1g{-9/2}{+2} (2008St01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
J$level is Coulomb excited from 3/2(-) 
T$measured B(E2)(W.u.) in 2008St04 (listed in Adopted Gammas) could not be used to obtain level half-life since |d(454|g) is unknown 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$level is Coulomb excited from 3/2(-); L(d,{+3}He)=1+3 from 0+ target for an unresolved level at 110 {I190} populated in {+2}H({+72}Zn,{+3}He), which, in comparison with neighboring nuclei such as {+69}Cu, corresponds to g.s., 3/2(-) + 534 level, |pf{-5/2}, and not 454, (1/2-) level. 
T$measured B(E2)(W.u.) in 2008St04 (listed in Adopted Gammas) could not be used to obtain level half-life since |d(534|g) is unknown 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$level is Coulomb excited from 3/2(-); configuration=|p2p{-3/2}~#(2+ in {+70,72}Ni) consistent with B(E2) values (2008St04) 
T$deduced (evaluators) from B(E2)(W.u.)=10.7 {I12} (2008St04) and branching ratio 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3 for 1860 {I150} suggests 5/2-,7/2-, with preference for 7/2-, |pf{-7/2} orbital (by 2015Mo22) for 1846 and/or 1895 levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$132.9|g to (15/2-); band member. Proposed configuration=|ng{-9/2}{+2}~@|pp{-3/2} (1998Is11) 
T$weighted average of 0.275 |ms {I14} from Ni({+86}Kr,X|g) and 0.25 |ms {I3} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
E,J$wide peak which may contain more than one state, however, angular distribution is well fitted with only L(d,{+3}He)=3; 7/2- with |pf{-7/2} orbital preferred by 2015Mo22 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+&(3/2)+
level_comment:
E,J$doublet with L(d,{+3}He)=0+2, |ps{-1/2}{+-1} for 1/2+ and (3/2)+ with |pd{-3/2}{+-1} orbitals preferred by 2015Mo22 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by evaluators from experimental B(E2)(W.u.) and branching ratio 
$Configuration=|p2p{-3/2}~#2+ in {+70,72}Ni proposed earlier is consistent with B(E2) values (2008St04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=|ng{-9/2}{+2}~@|pp{-3/2} (1998Is11) 
T$weighted average (by 1998Is11) of four values obtained from |g(t) of 133.0|g, 494.7|g, 939.1|g and 1189.1|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-&5/2-
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=0.8,1.4 
E$assumed to be a doublet consisting of 3/2- ground state and 5/2-, 534 keV state. From energy and L-transfer considerations, known level at 454, 1/2- could also be a part of this composite peak, but 2015Mo22 provide arguments, based on comparison with much weaker population of 1110, 1/2- level, as compared to 3/2- g.s. in {+69}Cu in (d,{+3}He), that this level is not expected to be populated strongly in the present work 
$C{+2}S: 0.8 {I2} for L=1, 3/2- (|pp{-3/2}); 1.4 {I6} for L=3, 5/2- (|pf{-5/2}), with the assumption of no contribution from the 454, 1/2- level 
$Proposed configuration: 60% |pp{-3/2}~#0+, 14% |pp{-3/2}~#2+ for the 3/2- g.s.; 36% |pf{-5/2}~#0+, 22% |pf{-5/2}~#4+ for the 5/2- at 310 keV theoretical level energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=3.7 {I6} 
E$wide peak which may contain more than one state, however, angular distribution is well fitted with only L=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) (2003Ma50) in {+9}Be({+76}Ge ,X) reaction. Value taken from table 1 of 2003Ma50. Listed as 320 ps {I17} in figures 1 and 2 of 2003Ma50. B(E2)(W.u.)=2.94 listed in authors' table gives 376 ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from |b(t) (2006Th12). Other: 6.6 s {I1} from |g(t) in 1983Ru06. 
J$In a simple shell model picture, the odd proton will occupy the p{-3/2} orbital while the odd neutron will occupy either the p{-1/2} or g{-7/2}. This will render J|p=1+, 2+, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-. Since the 270 keV isomer de-excites with a E2-M1-E1 cascade, it will be possible assign it 6- and 2+ to the ground state. However, detailed shell model calculations in 2006Th12 are very inconclusive. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$ from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Fl02); parity from comparison of measured |m and Q moments with shell-model model predictions. Calculated magnetic moment is positive for all the calculated 2+ states up to about 800 keV in these model predictions 
$ Best agreement of experimental |m and Q with and calculated moments is obtained for a predicted 2- state at 211 keV using jj44b interaction and for a predicted 2- state at 645 keV using JUN45 interaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$ spin measured in 2010Vi07, parity from comparison of level energies, g factors and quadrupole moments with shell-model calculations. 
$ Dominant |pf{-5/2}~#|ng{-9/2} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=2.92 s, %|b{+-}n=0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=294 s, %|b{+-}n=0.7 (2016Ma12) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+73}Cu)=0.523 fm{+2} {I15}(stat) {I58}(syst) (2016Bi08); the systematic uncertainty for isotope shift resulted from those in the atomic factors. 
J$spin from hyperfine structure measurement in 2009Fl03 and 2010Vi07, parity from comparison of level energies, g factors and quadrupole moments with shell-model calculations. Dominant |pp{-3/2} configuration for odd-A Cu isotopes, with some |ng{-9/2}{+4} admixture for {+73}Cu as suggested by 2001Fr21. See also 2017Ne04 review article 
T$weighted average of 4.4 s {I3} (1998Hu20) and 3.9 s {I3} (1983Ru06) 
MOMM1$measured relative to that for {+65}Cu g.s.=+2.3817 {I3}. Previous measurements: |m=+1.7426 {I8} (2009Fl03,2010Vi07); also listed in 2014StZZ 
MOME2$value of -0.200 {I10} in 2010Vi07 is re-evaluated to -0.210 {I10} by 2016St14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by the evaluator from experimental B(E2)(W.u.)=14.9 {I18} in Coulomb excitation (2008St04). 
$Configuration=|p2p{-3/2}~#2+ in {+70,72}Ni proposed earlier is consistent with B(E2) values (2008St04) 
J$possible |pp{-3/2}~#(2+ in {+72}Ni) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from recoil-distance Doppler-shift (RDDS) method (2015Sa09) in {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g) 
J$possible |pf{-5/2}~#(2+ in {+72}Ni) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$Measured B(E2)(W.u.)=23.1 {I21} (2008St04) 
$Level and |g first reported by 2008St04 
$Since |d(135|g) is unknown, level half-life cannot be deduced 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$Measured B(E2)(W.u.)=4.4 {I5} (2008St04) 
$Since |d(166|g) is unknown, level half-life cannot be deduced 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured B(E2)(W.u.)=14.9 {I18} (2008St04) 
T$deduced by evaluator from experimental B(E2)(W.u.). 
$Configuration=|p2p{-3/2}~#2+ in {+70,72}Ni proposed earlier is consistent with B(E2) values (2008St04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+74}Cu)=0.505 fm{+2} {I18}(stat) {I72}(syst) (2016Bi08). The systematic uncertainty for isotope shift resulted from uncertainties in the atomic factors 
%B-N$1991Kr15 claim to have observed delayed neutrons from {+74}Cu decay, but %|b{+-}n is not determined in this work 
J$ from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Fl02); parity from comparison of measured |m and Q moments with shell-model model predictions. Calculated magnetic moment is positive for all the calculated 2+ states up to about 800 keV in these model predictions. Best agreement of experimental |m and Q with calculated moments is obtained for a predicted 2- state at 208 keV using jj44b interaction and for a predicted 2- state at 44 keV using JUN45 interaction. Dominant configuration=|pf{-5/2}~#|ng{-9/2} 
T$weighted average of 1.75 s {I6} (2005Va19, timing of |g rays), 1.594 s {I10} (1991Kr15, timing of delayed neutrons), 1.59 s {I5} (1989Wi11, timing of |g rays). Uncertainty of 0.010 s given by 1991Kr15 increased by a factor of 5 in the averaging procedure. Others: 1.51 s {I27} (1990Be13), 1.60 s {I15} (1987LuZX) 
MOMM1,MOME2$from hyperfine structure measurements using collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Fl02,2010Vi07). Value of Q=+0.26 {I3} in 2010Fl02 is re-evaluated to +0.27 {I3} by 2016St14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$from hyperfine structure measurement by 2010Fl02 (Phys. Rev. C 82, 041302(R)), and parity from comparison with shell-model calculations 
$Moments compared with literature values measured at the same laboratory: |m=-1.068 {I3}, Q=+0.26 {I3} (2010Fl02, and 2010Vi07: Phys. Rev. C 82, 064311); also compared with shell-model calculations using A3DA-m and PFSDG-U interactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from fit using a linear background and two-component curve consisting of an exponential decay for the parent and growth and decay of the daughter contributions (2019Le05,2022Na07) 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+74}Cu in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-N$relative to %|b{+-}n=3.17 {I19} for {+144}Cs 
J$ spin from hyperfine structure using collinear laser spectroscopy technique (2009Fl03); and from in-source laser spectroscopy, at the ISOLDE-CERN facility (2011Ko36). Parity from comparison of measured magnetic moment with shell-model calculations 
T$weighted average of 1.222 s {I8} (2011Il01, deduced from weighted average of decay of 8 gamma rays), 1.224 s {I3} (1991Kr15, neutron and |b growth and decay curves). Others: 1.32 s {I32} (1990Be13, time correlation method), 1.3 s {I1} (1985Re01, neutron and |b growth and decay), 1.38 s {I8} (1987LuZX, multispectrum measurements). 
MOMM1$ hyperfine structure using laser spectroscopy (2009Fl03), value is relative to |m=+2.3817 {I3} for {+65}Cu g.s. Other: +1.01 {I5} (2011Ko36, in-source laser spectroscopy) 
MOME2$ collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Vi07) 
$ Dominant (|?90%) configuration=|p1f{-5/2} (2010Da06), with significant coupling to the 2+ vibrational excitation, as suggested by the deviation of measured magnetic moment from Schmidt value. Measurements of spin=3/2 and magnetic moments for {+71}Cu and {+73}Cu suggest inversion of |p2p{-3/2} to |p1f{-5/2} orbitals in |ng{-9/2} mid-shell 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$minimal feeding from both the higher spin states of {+75}Cu and the reaction was observed but no feeding-correction was mentioned in 2016Pe14. 
$Possible configuration: |pf{-5/2}~#2{++} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$spin from hypefine structure measurement by 2009Fl03 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 142501), and 2011Ko36 (Phys. Rev. C 84, 034320). Parity from comparison with shell-model calculations 
$Moments compared with literature values measured at the same laboratory: |m=+1.0062 {I13}, Q=-0.269 {I16} (2009Fl03, and 2010Vi07: Phys. Rev. C 82, 064311); also compared with shell-model calculations using A3DA-m and PFSDG-U interactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$assigned by 2019Ic02 from no oscillatory pattern observed for the 61.7-keV |g ray. Previous assignment was 3/2- or 1/2- in 2016Pe14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
MOMM1$from g factor=0.93 {I4}, measured by 2019Ic02 using TDPAD method. 
J$assigned by 2019Ic02 from observed oscillatory pattern for the 66.2-keV |g ray. Previous assignment was 3/2- or 1/2- in 2016Pe14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from fit using a linear background and two-component curve consisting of an exponential decay for the parent and growth and decay of the daughter contributions (2022Na07) 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+75}Cu in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+76}Cu)=+0.58 fm{+2} {I2}(stat) {I10}(syst) (2020De21) 
$Isotope shift |d|n({+65}Cu,{+76}Cu)=-4848 MHz {I5} (2020De21) 
%B-N$from 2009Wi03, weighted average of two measurements giving 7.3 {I6} and 7.0 {I6}; the first is from comparison of relative intensities of the most intense |g rays in {+76}Zn and {+75}Zn; second is from comparison of absolute intensities of most intense |g rays from nuclei in |b{+-}n branch to the number of ions deposited. This value is considered as composite for the 638-ms and 1.27-s activities. Previous value was 7 {I1} in 2008Wi01. Other %|b{+-}n measured values: <7.2 (2010Ho12), 2.2 {I5} (2000KoZH), 3 {I2} (1986ReZR) 
$Measured %|b{+-} decay=88 {I3} which populates {+76}Zn (2009Wi03) 
J$spin from hyperfine structure in 2017De30, negative parity from comparison with shell-model calculations. 
T$weighted average of 599 ms {I18} (2010Ho12), 653 ms {I24} (2005Va19), 641 ms {I6} (1991Kr15), 570 ms {I60} (697|g(t),1990Wi12), and 637 ms {I20} (2022Si25). Others: 647 ms {I5} (2000KoZH), 0.61 s {I10} (1986ReZR), 0.35 s {I8} (697|g(t),1987LuZX). 
T$details of the half-life measurements are as follows. 2010Ho12: measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+76}Cu) in Si detectors (2010Ho12) The authors used method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved. 2005Va19: from |g-decay curves with laser-on and laser-off, single component exponential decay fits. 1991Kr15: measured decay curve for delayed neutrons from {+76}Cu decay 
MOMM1,MOME2$from hyperfine structure measurement using Collinear Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy (CRIS) (2017De30). Measured value of |m=-1.0895 {I15} is re-evaluated to |m=-1.0907 {I15} by 2019StZV. Measured value of Q=+0.34 {I2} is re-evaluated to Q=+0.36 {I2} by 2021StZZ. 2017De30 compared measured |m and Q with shell-model calculations using A3DA-m and PFSDG-U interactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$from 599|g(t), apparent T{-1/2}({+76}Cu isomer)=0.84 s {I6}; but after subtraction of 698|g contribution, T{-1/2}({+76}Cu isomer)=1.27 s {I30} (1990Wi12) which is assigned to a second, longer-lived isomer in 1990Wi12. This isomer was not confirmed by 2005Va19 in their resonance ionization laser spectroscopy; and the decay curves for 599|g and 698|g showed no time differences. 2009Wi03 (same first author as in 1990Wi12) mentioned disagreement about the existence of the isomer citing 1990Wi12 and 2005Va19 papers, and appeared to have considered only one activity for {+76}Cu. 2010Ho12 do not discuss the isomer in {+76}Cu. Its existence is considered as highly uncertain by the evaluators 
J$1,2,3 proposed by 1990Wi12 based on decay mode and expected shell-model considerations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Measured change in the mean-squared charge radius: |d<r{+2}>({+65}Cu,{+77}Cu)=+0.59 fm{+2} {I2}(stat) {I11}(syst) (2020De21, collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN). 
$Measured isotope shift (IS) for {+77}Cu=-5234 MHz {I5} (2020De21, collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN). 
%B-N$weighted average of 29.2 {I30} (2018Ra27, ion-|b-n); 31.0 {I38} (2010Ho12, ion, |b-n); 30.3 {I20} (2009Il01, ion-|b, n, |g|g, their earlier values: 30.0 {I27} in 2009Wi03 and 36 {I3} in 2008Wi01). 2012Ko29 (from the same group as 2009Il01) also analyzed |b{+-}n=30 {I2} for {+77}Cu decay. 2009Pa35 give apparent percent feedings of 21.6% to the first 2+ level and 4.7% to the first 4+ level in {+76}Zn. Measured %|b feeding to {+77}Zn=70 {I7} (2009Wi03) agrees well with 100-(measured %|b{+-}n)=69.9 {I20}. The analysis in 2018Ra27 is consistent with %|b{+-}2n=0.000 {I2}, as expected for forbidden |b{+-}2n decay mode of {+77}Cu. See also 2020Li32 evaluation Others: %|b{-}n|>26 (2009Pa35, |b-n); >10 (2000KoZH, |b,n); 15 {I+10-5} (2002Pf04, compilation) 
J$spin from hyperfine structure in 2017De30, and from 2011Ko36, in-source laser spectroscopy at the CERN-ISOLDE facility. Parity from comparison of measured magnetic dipole moment with shell-model calculations, using A3DA-m and PFSDG-U interactions (2011Ko36). Proposed (2011Ko36) configuration=|pf{-5/2} with 15% admixture of |pp{-1/2}~#2+ (vibrational excitation) 
T$weighted average of 476.8 ms {I34} (2014XuZZ, |b-|g); 466 ms {I+21-20} (2010Ho12, ion,|b,n; earlier value of 450 ms {I+13-21} in 2005Ho08); 467.4 ms {I21} (2009Pa35, |b-n); 480 ms {I9} (2009Il01, |g decay curves for 114|g, 505|g and 1277|g); 466 ms {I5} (2000KoZH, |b,n); 469 ms {I8} (1991Kr15, n). Other: 471 ms {I25} (2018Ra27, n). See also 2020Li32 evaluation 
MOMM1$from hyperfine structure studies using collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017De30); measured |m=+1.5945 {I17} (2017De30) is re-evaluated to +1.5863 {I17} by 2019StZV. Other: |m=+1.61 {I5} (2011Ko36, in-source laser method, data analyzed in comparison with magnetic moment=+2.2273456 {I14} for {+63}Cu g.s. with J|p=3/2- used as a reference). 
$Average measured neutron energy from {+77}Cu decay=450 {I150} (2009Pa35) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E$the level is tentative in 2017Sa32, but based on {+9}Be({+78}Zn,p|g) data in 2018Va08, the level is certain from the observation of a strong 2068|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,J$tentative level proposed in revised data Table and comments received, June 5, 2020 from the authors of 2017Sa32 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$level introduced by compiler to account for population of neutron-unbound levels, as suggested by %|b{+-}n values measured by 2010Ho10 and 2014XuZZ x<6105 {I500} from Q(|b{+-})-S(n)({+77}Cu), where Q(|b{+-})=12063 {I500} and S(n)=5958.1 {I71} (2017Wa10 and mass measurement by 2017We16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-,5-,6-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%B-N$ from comparison of absolute intensities of most intense |g rays from nuclei in |b{+-}n branch to the number of ions deposited, measured %|b decay=35 {I8} which populates {+78}Zn (2009Wi03). Others: |>65 {I8} (2005Va19), 15 {I+10-5} (2002Pf04) 
J$(4-,5-) proposed by 2005Va19 based on absence of apparent |b feeding to (2+) and (6+) levels in {+78}Zn and from shell-model predictions with configurations: |p2p{-3/2}|n1g{-9/2}{+-1}, |p2p{-1/2}|n1g{-9/2}{+-1} and |p1f{-5/2}|n1g{-9/2}{+-1}. 2008Wi01 also suggest possible configuration=|pp{-3/2}{+-1}~#|ng{-9/2}{+-1}, however, they suggest that |pf{-5/2} orbital may also be contributing to the structure of this state as indicated by properties of {+79}Cu decay. 2009Gr06 propose (6-) possibly based on |b feedings to (6+) and (8+) levels in {+78}Zn. Since the decay scheme of {+78}Cu to {+78}Zn is not known well, the evaluators assign (4-,5-,6-) based on shell-model configurations listed above 
T$from timing of delayed neutrons. Weighted average of 342 ms {I11} (1991Kr15) and 323 ms {I+11-19} (2005Ho08). Others: 290 ms {I100} (2005Va19), 250 ms {I90} (from timing of 737|g,1987LuZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ A total of 4653 implants were detected, and 310 correlated |bn coincidences were observed 
T$ from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+78}Cu) in Si detectors (2010Ho12) The authors used method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved. In previous publication T{-1/2}=323 ms {I+11-19} (2005Ho08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3:6)
level_comment:
MOMM1$ in-source laser method, data analyzed in comparison with magnetic moment=+2.2273456 {I14} for {+63}Cu g.s. with J|p=3/2- used as a reference (2011Ko36) 
J$ hyperfine structure data are consistent with J=3-6 and |m=0.0 {I4}. The data analyzed assuming J|p=6- as proposed in |b decay studies (2009Gr06: Acta Phys Pol B 40, 447) are displayed in figure 5 of 2011Ko36 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-,5-,6-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from |b|g-coin decay curve (2014Xu07). Other: 335 ms {I11} in {+78}Cu Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 
J$from {+78}Cu Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
J$spin of 6 is consistent with hyperfine structure in 2017De30, but spins of 4,5 and 7 are also possible. A similar conclusion was arrived in 2011Ko36 (Phys Rev C 84, 034320), where spins of 3,4,5 or 6 were assigned from hyperfine structure study. Negative parity from comparison with shell-model calculations 
$Moments compared with shell-model calculations using A3DA-m and PFSDG-U interactions, and with measured |m=0.0 {I4} (2011Ko36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n: from weighted average of 72 {I12} (2010Ho12) and 55 {I17} (1991Kr15). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=156.8 ms, %|b{+-}n=25.4, %|b{+-}2n=0.0 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=1.14 s, %|b{+-}n=56.5, %|b{+-}2n=0.2 (2016Ma12) 
E$the observed activity is assumed to be in its ground state 
J$5/2- from systematics (2012Au07,2012Ko29), 1/2- in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$weighted average of 241.3 ms {I21} (2014Xu07,2014XuZZ), 257 ms {I+29-26} (2010Ho12), 188 ms {I25} (1991Kr15). If the low value from 1991Kr15 is excluded, weighted average is 241.4 ms {I22}. In 2014Xu07, T{-1/2} is from |b|g-coin decay curve; 2014XuZZ also give 249 ms {I12} from |b decay. In 2010Ho12, T{-1/2} is from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+79}Cu) in Si detectors, using method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved. 
$In 2010Ho12, a total of 754 implants were detected, and 81 correlated |bn coincidences were observed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode has been observed by 2010Ho12 and 2014Xu07 
E$the observed activity is assumed to be in its ground state 
J$1/2- neutron orbital and 1/2- proton orbital in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$weighted average of 113.3 ms {I64} (2014Xu07) and 0.17 s {+11-5} (2010Ho12). In 2014Xu07, T{-1/2} is from |b|g-coin decay curve. In 2010Ho12, T{-1/2} is from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+80}Cu) in Si detectors, using method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved. 
$In 2010Ho12, a total of 16 implants were detected, and no correlated |bn coincidences were observed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=80, %|b{+-}2n=6 (2019Mo01); %|b{+-}n=100 (2002Pf04) 
$Only |b{+-} decay mode has been observed in 2014Xu07 
E$the observed activity is assumed to be in its ground state 
J$ 5/2- from systematics (2021Ko07), 1/2- in theoretical calculations (2019Mo01) 
T$from 2014Xu07, decay curve of time difference between implantations and correlated |b decays using maximum likelihood (MLH) method and including half-lives of parent, daughter, and grand-daughter nuclei together with |b-delayed neutron emission channels 
$ Measured production |s=70 pb {I35} (2010Oh02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ Measured |s=3 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?50% 
T$From |b{+-} measurement (2014XuZZ); Calculated values: 46.8 ms (1997Mo25), 40 ms (2002Pf04) 
$Since no events were observed for neighboring hydrogen-like peaks, the misidentification of {+82}Cu is not possible (2010Oh02) 
$Calculated: %|b{+-}n=45 {I9} (2014XuZZ), 52.8 (2014Mi23), 98.9 (2002Pf04), 28.1 (1997Mo25); %|b{+-}2n=30 {I8} (2014XuZZ), 39.3 (2014Mi23), 63.6 (1997Mo25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{+-} decay is the only decay mode possible, followed by delayed neutron decays through one- and two-neutron emissions, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=25.5 ms, %|b{+-}n=68, %|b{+-}2n=23, %|b{+-}3n=5, %|b{+-}4n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=27.7 ms, %|b{+-}n=33.6, 32.0; %|b{+-}2n=4.7, 5.2; %|b{+-}3n=0.368, 0.532, %|b{+-}4n=0 (2021Mi17), the two values are for different fission barriers. 
$21 events were assigned to {+83}Cu by 2017Su15, which are assumed by the evaluators to correspond to the g.s. activity of {+83}Cu 
$Probability of misidentification of {+83}Cu<0.01% (2017Su15). 
$Measured production |s=0.17 pb {I+5-4} (2017Su15) 
J$1/2- (theory, 2019Mo01); 5/2- (syst, 2021Ko07) 
T$half-life is not measured, but expected to be greater than few hundred ns from the flight time of fragments through the separator. Based on decreasing trend of half-lives as the neutron number increases in n-rich nuclei, evaluators estimate T{-1/2}<30 ms from literature half-lives of 33 ms for {+82}Cu, 73 ms for {+81}Cu, 114 ms for {+80}Cu, and 241 ms for {+79}Cu. Other: 21 ms from systematics (2021Ko07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
%B-$decay mode not observed, however, inferred by compiler as only energetically allowed decay mode. 
$3 counts assigned to {+84}Cu by 2024Sh17, which are assumed by the compiler to correspond to the g.s. activity of {+84}Cu 
$production cross section could not be determined, as mean position at the focal plane was outside the slit opening (2024Sh17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%2P$ Others: 87 {+10-17} (2005Bl15). 
T$ From 2011As08. Other: 3.2 ms {I+18-8} (2005Bl15). 
$ Q(2p)=1280 {I210} (2011As08). Other: 1480 keV {I20} (2005Bl15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%2P$ other: 87 {+10-17} (2005Bl15). 
T$ Determined as 1.59 ms {+60-35} (2011As08) by time difference between implantation and decay events. Other: 3.2 ms {I+18-8} (2005Bl15). 
$ Q(2p)=1280 {I210} (2011As08). other: 1480 keV {I20} (2005Bl15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$5/2- from theory (2019Mo01) and systematics (2021Ko07) 
T$from 2007Do17 (|b{++}-delayed proton decay curve). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-2 
$%|ep is weighted average of 88.5 {I26} (2016Or03,2014Or04) and 86.0 {I49} (2007Do17) 
T$weighted average of 32.9 ms {I8} (2016Or03,2014Or04, from time correlations between {+56}Zn implants and protons and least-squares fit; authors also report 32.8 ms {I8} in 2016Or03 with maximum likelihood minimization fit; T{-1/2}=27 ms {I8} from 1834.5|g decay curve (2014Or04), and 31.2 ms {I11} (2016Or03) using Batemann equations for fitting of the correlation-time spectrum containing all the follow-up decays; value of 32.9 ms {I8} is adopted in 2016Or03); and 30.0 ms {I17} (2007Do17, from (implants)(proton) correlated events) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from implant-p(t) based on 325 proton decays (2020Ci04) 
%B+P$from 325 proton decay events observed for 545 {+57}Zn events and a detection efficiency of 66% {I7} (2020Ci04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 86.5 ms {I32} (e-mail communication of July 30, 2014 with Professor B. Rubio, University of Valencia), 88 ms {I5} (2012OrZY), 90 ms 8 (2009Fu15), 83 ms {I10} (2005Ka46), 83 ms {I10} (2002Lo13), 86 ms {I18} (1998Jo18). Methods: |g decay timing (2009Fu15), |b-gated timing (1998Jo18), |b(fragment) timing correlations (2002Lo13,2012OrZY). Method not discussed in 2005Ka46. 2012OrZY (and result of new experiment communicated on July 30, 2014), 2009Fu15 and 2002Lo13 are from GANIL; 2005Ka46 and 1998Jo18 are from ISOLDE-CERN. Since all are independent experiments even though some authors are the same on above publications, weighted averaging of all data is justifiable 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1 
$|ep decay mode from {+58}Zn Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (July 2014 update) 
T$measured by 2017Ku12 from ({+58}Zn implants)|b correlated decay curve; also 83 ms {I2} from decay curve for 203|g and 98 ms {I19} from 848|g decay curve in 2017Ku12. Others: 83 ms {I10} in 2002Lo13 (Phys. Rev. C 66, 025803); 88 ms {I5} in 2012OrZY (AIP Conf. Proc. 1491, 81); 90 ms {I8} in 2009Fu15 (Int. J. Mod. Phys. E18, 2134); 83 ms {I10} in 2005Ka46 (Eur. Phys.J. A25, Supplement 1, 129); 70 ms {I15} in 2001Ma96 (Eur. Phys. J. A12, 269); 86 ms {I8} in 1998Jo18 (Eur. Phys. J. A{-3}, 271). Value is 86.7 ms {I24} in {+58}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 
$Total number of {+58}Zn implanted ions=1.77|*10{+5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
%B+P$from 88 proton decay events observed for over 36000 {+58}Zn events and a detection efficiency of 35 % {I3} (2020Ci04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%|ep is weighted average of 0.09% {I2} (1984Ar12) and 0.23% {I8} (1981Ho19). 
MOMM1 predicted value is -0.57 {I10} (2001Bu08), based on linear correlation between g.s. g-factors and superallowed |b-decay strengths of mirror nuclei. 
J from super-allowed |e decay with log| {Ift}=3.71 {I2} to 3/2- {+59}Cu(g.s.). 
T Weighted ave. of 182.2 ms {I18} (1984Ar12 - from |b(t) with mass-separated source), 210 ms {I20} (1981Ho19), 173 ms {I14} (2002Lo13,2002Bl17), 213 ms {I34} (2014Ro14), 174 ms {I2} (2017RuZX - same group reports 173.3 ms {I33} in 2014Ru08) at 99% level. Uncertainty is the lowest input value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$Unweighted average of 1969Ho01 (2.42 min {i2}) and 1972Du09 (2.33 min {i5}), both |g(t) with NaI and separated sources. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$L=3 or (0) for a 3520 {i30} group in ({+3}He,n); (M1+E2) to 2+ and from 3(+),4(+). However, 2(+), 4(+) for a 3520 {i30} group in ({+3}He,n). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
J configuration=((|n f{-5/2})(|n g{-9/2}))7- or configuration=((|p f{-5/2})(|p g{-9/2}))7-, see ({+12}C,{+10}Be) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,n)=(2,3) for E=8730 {i30}. A (4+) level at 8750 {i50} is reported in ({+12}C,{+10}Be) but it decays to (0+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$ allowed |b transitions to 1/2- (log| {Ift}=5.96) and 5/2- (log| {Ift}=5.20) levels in {+61}Cu from {+61}Zn |e 
T$from 1972Du09. Others: 88.8 s {I18} (1955Li39), 88.5 s {I10} (1959Cu86), 85.9 s {I6} (1969Ho02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
T$|g-intensity balance at 124 level suggests that this level is long-lived, estimated mean lifetime |?8 ns (2006An31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J$(1/2,3/2,5/2) (1984Th07) 
$|g-branching ratios in 1984Th07 seem incorrect especially for 519|g. These are taken from 1982Sm01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J$9/2- (1982Sm01), 9/2, however lower spins are not completely excluded (1984Th07), 9/2- (1989Sc28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-,11/2-
level_comment:
J$7/2-,11/2- proposed based on 1274|g(|q) (1989Sc28). 11/2- is inconsistent with negative A{-2} for 1274|g to 7/2-, but 11/2- is assigned in Adopted Levels based on E2 multipolarity of 1273.6|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J$9/2,13/2- proposed based on 1532|g(|q) (1989Sc28). 13/2- is inconsistent with negative A{-2} for 1532|g to 9/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From electronic fast-timing method with lifetime of 4.6 ns {I1} (2017Qu05). Compiler notes that a misprint in "Section V. Conclusions" of 2017Qu05, stating that 4.6 ns {1} is the half-life. It should instead be the lifetime 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 9.186 h {i13} (1982Gr10, from decay curve for two |g rays followed over 8 to 11 half-lives, but no details); 9.231 h {I20}, 9.23 h {I6} (1972Cr02,|g counting, average of measurements for four |g rays of 260, 394, 548 and 597 keV at two different energies of E({+3}He) beam in {+64}Zn({+3}He,X) reaction; 9.34 h {I4} and 9.39 h {I5} at two other beam energies not used in the averaging procedure because of low counting rates and apparent discrepant results); 9.3 h {I2} (1967Ro01, |g decay curve, but no details); 9.2 h {I1} (1967An01, from decay curves for several conversion lines, but no other details); 9.13 h {I3} (1964Ru06, |g|g counting method, eight runs, but no other details); 9.3 h {I2} (1954Nu27,|g counting, but no details). Others: 8.4 h {I2} (1953Ku08, preliminary value from a composite decay curve of several activities produced), 9.33 h (1950Ha65, from positron decay curve), 9.5 h (1948Mi12, from electron counting using GM counter). Reduced |h{+2}=1.5. Uncertainty is obtained by multiplying uncertainty of 0.0125 by (reduced |h{+2}){+1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$ from g factor=+0.37 {I10} (2002Ke02) using projectile Coulomb excitation in inverse kinematics and transient magnetic fields. Data reanalyzed in 2010Mo14 with the same result of g=+0.37 {I10} 
J$E2 |g to 0+ 
T$ from evaluation by 2011PrZZ, based on mean lifetime measurements of 4.2 ps {I7} (2007St16), 4.3 ps {I3} (2002Ke02), 4.2 ps {I3} (1981Wa09) and 2.5 ps {I+10-20} (1977BrYO) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, M1+E2 |g to 2+; not 1 from excitation function 
T$>0.7 ps from DSAM, <2.8 ps from RDM, {+58}Ni({+6}Li,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,d)=L(p,t)=2 
T$DSA in ({+3}He,2n|g) 
E$identified as one component of one-phonon mixed-symmetry 2+ state (2010Al28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in ({+3}He,2n|g); L(p,t)=(2) 
T$DSA in ({+3}He,2n|g) 
E$identified as second component of one-phonon mixed-symmetry 2+ state (2010Al28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$ 2010Al28 identify the 3209 {I4}+ state as a good candidate for a two-phonon mixed symmetry state. However, non-observation of expected transition to the one-phonon mixed symmetry 2+ state at 2803 keV does not allow a confirmed identification of such an excitation 
J$from |g|g(|q) (2010Al28). J|p=3- is ruled out since such an adoption would give a large quadrupole (M2) admixture for 1023.7|g which is inconsistent with RUL. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 4+ 
T$from DSAM in ({+3}He,2n|g). Others: 0.17 ps {I+14-7} from (|a,2n|g); 0.25 ps +17-7 in ({+6}Li,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 
E$not the same as 3840 level seen in ({+6}Li,d) with L=1; evaluators assume 3840 is same as 3870 {I30} L=1 level in ({+3}He,n) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$3,5 from |g(|q), linear polarization; 5 from excitation function in ({+6}Li,pn|g); |p=- from L({+6}Li,d); gammas to 4+ states 
T$from DSAM in ({+3}He,2n|g). Other: 0.69 ps {I+14-49} in ({+6}Li,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$<3.5 ps from RDM, >0.7 ps from DSAM in {+58}Ni({+6}Li,pn|g) 
J$3,5,7 from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol); yrast population disfavors 3; transition strength arguments (RUL) restrict parity to be the same as that of 4042; 7- supported by shell-model calculations (1990Bo27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(7,9) from |g(|q), linear polarization and excitation function in ({+6}Li,pn|g); same parity as that of 4904 level 
T$0.7 ps<T{-1/2}<7 ps from RDM and DSA, {+58}Ni({+6}Li,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$3 or 5 from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol); 5 from excitation function. Possibly the first 5- from systematics of even-A Zn nuclei 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$4 or 6 from |g(|q); excitation function supports 6+; transition strength arguments (RUL) exclude negative parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5,7
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$3,5 or 7 from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol); yrast population disfavors 3; transition strength arguments (RUL) restrict the parity to be the same as that for 4042 level 
T$ <3.5 ps from RDM; >0.7 ps from DSAM for 5122 and 5130 levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7(-),9(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$5,7 or 9 from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) with same parity as that of the 4904 level; 5 rejected by excitation function 
T$ <7 ps from RDM, >0.7 ps from DSA 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$ absolute S=0.210, assuming the spectroscopic factor for the |a+triton configuration of {+7}Li is unity. S value is extremely sensitive to the choice of |a+target bound-state parameters used in the DWBA calculation. See 1988Ra28 for analysis of these and other other data using different geometrical parameters.  


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$S(|a)=0.21 
S$ 0.42 at 46 MeV, 0.40 at 60 MeV (1978Be52) 
$ Absolute spectroscopic factor=1.9 at 46 MeV, 4.3 at 60 MeV (1978Be25) 
E$ 930 (1971Fa12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$ from all studies 
$ d|s/d|W=0.93 mb/sr (E=15 MeV), 1.44 mb/sr (E=18 MeV), 0.90 mb/sr (E=21 MeV), all at 0|' (1974Ev02). Calculated (DWBA) cross sections: 2.74 |mb/sr, 3.8 |mb/sr, 3.6 |mb/sr at the respective energies above 
$ d|s/d|W=0.98 mb/sr {I3} (1975Al05), may contain contribution from {+12}C contamination on target 
$ d|s/d|W=0.8 mb/sr at 3|' (1972Gr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$1975Al05 reported an L=0 level at 5390 {I50} 
$ d|s/d|W=0.38 |mb/sr {I5} (1975Al05); may contain contribution from {+12}C contamination on target 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-&4+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=116 {I35} 
J$4+ from systematic trends and crude shell-model calculations with configuration=|pf{-5/2}{+2} (1990Bo27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+&7-
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=47 {I14} 
E$from Fig. 5 of 1990Bo27. E=4500, 4700 listed in Table IV of 1990Bo27 
J$7- is based on systematic trends; configuration= |nf{-5/2}~#|ng{-9/2} (1990Bo27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=171 {I51} 
J$based on crude shell-model calculations with configuration= |pf{-5/2}~#|pg{-9/2} (1990Bo27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=30 {I9} 
J$based on crude shell-model calculations with configuration= |pg{-9/2}~#|pd{-5/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=490 
L$ also from 1976Gu08, 1973Ku05, 1972Fa08, 1966Mc15, 1964Ba34 
$ d|s/d|W=911 |mb/sr 
$ d|s/d|W=442 |mb/sr {I12} at 19.0|' and E=51.9 MeV (1985Mi06) 
$ Enhancement factor=71 (1972Fa08) 
$ |s=280.5 |mb (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=197 
L$ also from 1976Gu08, 1973Ku05, 1972Fa08, 1964Ba34 
$ d|s/d|W=150 |mb/sr 
$ Enhancement factor=2.4 (1972Fa08) 
E$ Adopted value is 954.0 
$ E=0.95E3, |s=46.4 |mb (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=23 
L$ also from 1973Ku05, 1972Fa08 
$ d|s/d|W=19 |mb/sr 
$ Enhancement factor=0.38 (1972Fa08) 
E$ Adopted value is 1804.7 
$ E=1.80E3, |s=6.4 |mb (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=15 
L$ also from 1973Ku05, 1972Fa08 
$ d|s/d|W=2.6 |mb/sr 
$ Enhancement factor=0.014 (1972Fa08) 
$ E=2190, |s=6.1 |mb (1973Ku05). E=2170 10 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=0.7 
$ d|s/d|W=1.5 |mb/sr 
L$ also from 1973Ku05 for a 2380 group 
$ E=2380, |s=0.7 |mb (1973Ku05). E=2340 20 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=130 
$ d|s/d|W=23 |mb/sr 
L$others: 3 (1972Fa08); 3,4 (1973Ku05), 4+2 for 2750+2810 doublet (1976Gu08) 
$ E=2750, |s=63.2 |mb for 2750+2800 (1973Ku05). E=2740 20 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=49 
L$ from 1974Hi05, 1973Ku05. 4+2 for 2750+2810 doublet (1976Gu08) 
$ d|s/d|W=43 |mb/sr 
$ E=2800, |s=63.2 |mb for 2750+2800 (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=39 |mb/sr 
E$ Adopted value is 3209.2 
L$ others: 4 (1972Fa08); 4+2 for 3160+3210 doublet (1976Gu08) 
$ Enhancement factor=0.35 (1972Fa08) 
$ E=3220, |s=38.3 |mb (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=21 
L$ also from 1973Ku05, 1972Fa08 
$ d|s/d|W=19 |mb/sr 
$ E=3440, |s=5.9 |mb (1973Ku05). E=3440 10 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=1.9 |mb/sr 
L$|s(|q) is in poor agreement with DWBA for L=4 or L=3, or sum. Other: 1 or 2 for 3780 {I20} group in 1973Ku05, which may be a doublet corresponding to 3730 and 3830 levels in 1974Hi05 
$ E=3780, |s=5.8 |mb (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$N=1.5 
$ d|s/d|W=6.1 |mb/sr 
$ E=4000, |s=3.4 |mb (1973Ku05). E=3980 20 (1972Fa08) 
L$ also from 1973Ku05, 1972Fa08 
$ Enhancement factor=1.4 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$others: 4 (1972Fa08) for a 4170 group; 0 or 4 in 1973Ku05 for a 4160 group, which may correspond to 4090+4220 
$ d|s/d|W=3.8 |mb/sr 
$ Enhancement factor=0.15 (1972Fa08) 
$ E=4160, |s=9.9 |mb (1973Ku05). E=4170 10 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=4.3 |mb/sr 
L$ other: 3 in 1973Ku05 for a 4320 group in 1973Ku05 4380 level 
$ E=4320, |s=4.0 |mb (1973Ku05). E=4320 20 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=10 |mb/sr 
L$ also from 1972Fa08 for a 4570 group 
$ Enhancement factor=2.1 (1972Fa08) 
$ E=4600, |s=5.6 |mb (1973Ku05). E=4570 10 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ d|s/d|W=3.9 |mb/sr 
L$ DWBA fit is not shown in 1974Hi05. Other: (2) for a 4860 {I20} group in 1972Fa08 
$ E=4860 (1973Ku05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$others: 2,(3) (1972Fa08). 4 in 1973Ku05 for a 5020 group 
$ E=5090 (1973Ku05). E=5050 20 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$ from 1972Fa08. 1973Ku05 report a level at 5400 {I20}; |s(|q) shown, but no L value defined 
$ |s(integral)=8.2 |mb (1973Ku05) 
$ Enhancement factor=0.48 (1972Fa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ 960 20 (1972Gu12), 950 (1978Be25) 
L$ 2 (1972Gu12,1978Be25) 
S$other: 0.23 (1978Be25) 
$ d|s/d|W(50|')=1.3 |mb/sr {I2} (1972Gu12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ 3180 20 (1972Gu12), 3220 (1978Be25) 
L$ 3,4 (1972Gu12), 3 (1978Be25) 
S$other: 0.27 (1978Be25) 
$ d|s/d|W(50|')=4.2 |mb/sr {I3} (1972Gu12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ from 1972Gu12. Others: 3840 (1977Fu03), 3850 (1978Be25) 
L$ (1) (1978Be25), 1 for 3870+4040 doublet (1975Ju03) 
S$other: 0.30 (1978Be25) 
$ d|s/d|W(50|')=2.7 |mb/sr {I2} (1972Gu12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ from 1972Gu12. Others: 3990 (1977Fu03), 4030 (1978Be25) 
S,L$other: 0.10 for L=(5) (1978Be25) 
$ d|s/d|W(50|')=5.0 |mb/sr {I3} (1972Gu12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L$ 4 in 1975Fu02, but not given in their later paper (1977Fu03) 
S$other: 0.10 for L=(5) (1978Be25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$ 2010Al28 identify the 3209, 4+ state as a good candidate for a two-phonon mixed symmetry state. However, non-observation of expected transition to the one-phonon mixed symmetry 2+ state at 2803 keV does not allow confirmed identification of such an excitation 
J$from |g|g(|q) (2010Al28). J|p=3- is ruled out - would give a large quadrupole (M2) admixture for 1023.7|g which is inconsistent with RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$ g factor measured by 2002Ke02 using projectile Coulomb excitation in inverse kinematics and transient magnetic fields. Data reanalyzed in 2010Mo14 with the same result of +0.37 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$ assigned 0+ in ENSDF database based on earlier (p,t) studies (1974Hi05,1973Ku05) and |g|g(|q) in ({+3}He,2n|g) study (2010Al28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$from the Adopted Levels of {+62}Zn in the ENSDF database. (October 2011 update). This value was not included by authors in their energy calibration procedure. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$matched with 4008.4 {I7}, 0+ level in the ENSDF database. Compiler's note: the energy matching is poor, difference in energy being 72 keV {I6}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$matched with 4448.0 {I3}, (1+) level in the ENSDF database. Compiler's note: the energy matching is poor, difference in energy being 35 keV {I9}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$matched with 4620 {I20}, (0+) level in the ENSDF database. Compiler's note: the energy matching is poor, difference in energy being 68 keV {I21}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$2342.1 {I1} (2020Ma59) 
J$from (1388|g)(954|g)(|q) in 2020Ma59. J|p=2+, as proposed in 2013Le25 from L(p,t)=2, and also in 2019Le11 (Phys. Rev. C 100, 014320) is excluded with 99.9% confidence in the present |g|g(|q) data. Note that firm 0+ was assigned for this level in {+62}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, based on |g|g(|q) data in {+61}Ni({+3}He,2n|g) (2010Al28: Nucl. Phys. A847, 180); L({+6}Li,d)=0 in 1977Fu03 (Nucl. Phys. A284, 329); and L(p,t)=0 in 1974Hi05 (Phys. Rev. C 10, 1381) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$3046.3 {I1} (2020Ma59) 
J$(2093|g)(954|g)(|q) in 2020Ma59 consistent with 0+, but also allows J=1,2,3,4. 2020Ma59 assign definite 0+, combining their |g|g(|q) data and L(p,t)=0 in 2013Le25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_comment:
E$3180.9 {I3} (2020Ma59) 
J$(2227|g)(954|g(|q) (2020Ma59) allows J=1,2,3,4; |g to 0+ and probable |b feeding by Gamow-Teller transition from 0+ parent do not permit J=2,3,4. Compiler's note: 1- is not completely excluded by log| {Ift} value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
T$for GDR for T=0.9 MeV with SLO model. Others: |G varies from 5.5 to 7.9 MeV for different model parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
T$for GDR for T=1.5 MeV with SLO model. Others: |G varies from 6.6 to 8.6 MeV for different model parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$spin from optical-double resonance (1969La05,1976Fu06) and collinear laser spectroscopy (2017Wr01); |p=- based on L(p,d)=1 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 38.71 min {I80} (2021Ha10), 38.84 min {I15} (2015BoZY), 38.1 min {I8} (2000Le02), 38.47 min {I5} (1982Gr10), 38.5 min {I1} (1969Bo15), and 38.4 min {I1} (1968Go10). Others: 38.0 min {I1} (1974Co16) and 37.9 min {I2} (1969Bo11) are outliers. Weighted average of all values is 38.41 min {I8} with a reduced |h{+2}=4.9 and the unweighted average is 38.37 min {I12}. 
MOMM1$from 2019StZV evaluation based on -0.28156 {I5} measured using optical-double resonance in 1969La05. Other: -0.282 {I1} from hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). 
MOME2$from hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy (2017Wr01). See also 2021StZZ compilation. Other: +0.29 {I3} from 1969La05 using optical-double resonance. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+68,63}=-0.389 {I9}(stat){I43}(syst) (2019Xi07). 
$Note that 2021StZZ gives an incorrect reference of 1969La05 for the new value of Q from 2017Wr01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol p,d)=L(pol d,t)=3 from 0+; L-1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$from RDM in (|a,n|g). Other: 0.62 ns {I21} from gT{-1/2}=0.19 ns {I7} and if g=0.30, integral rotation (1977Ni01) in (|a,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(pol p,d)=L(pol d,t)=1 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$other: >0.35 ps from (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$1063.5|g E2, |DJ=2 to 3/2-. L(pol d,t)=3 and 1 from 0+ for an unresolved doublet and analyzing powers also suggests 7/2- for this component and 1/2- for the component at E=1065 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3 and 1 from 0+ for an unresolved doublet and analyzing powers suggests 7/2- for the component at E=1063 which agrees with other evidences, and 1/2- for this component. This is also supported by L({+3}He,|a)=3,1 from a doublet. Other: 5/2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$from |t=139 fs {I35}, weighted average of 190 fs {I+80-50} from (p,n|g) and 125 fs {I35} from (|a,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$from |t=0.345 ps {I90}, weighted average of 0.370 ps {I+180-110} from (p,n|g) and 0.335 ps {I90} from (|a,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3 from 0+; L-1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$from |t=102 fs {I+27-20}, weighted average of 90 fs {I+27-20} from (p,n|g) and 120 fs {I30} from (|a,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1210.7|g E2, |DJ=2 to 5/2-; 797.9|g M1+E2 to 7/2- 
T$|t=0.71 ps {I23}, weighted average of 0.71 ps {I23} from (|a,n|g) and 0.48 ps {I+100-22} from (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers. But J=5/2 from (p,n|g) is in disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g). Others: 3/2,5/2,7/2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) and (9/2+) from L(pol d,t)=(4) are in disagreement 
T$other: <0.28 ps from (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers 
T$other: 0.18 ps {I5} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant, which may stem from 1910|g not being recognized as a doublet by 1979Mu09 in (|a,n|g), as stated in 1982Pa01 in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1599.8|g E2, |DJ=2 to 5/2-, 1184.9|g M1+E2 to 7/2-. Other: 5/2,7/2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) is in disagreement 
T$from |t=0.24 ps {I+10-7}, weighted average of 0.24 ps {I+10-7} from (p,n|g) and 0.15 ps {I4} from (|a,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1 from 0+; L-1/2 transfer from analyzing powers. Other: (3/2) from (p,n|g) is in disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=3/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g); 2042.8|g M1+E2 to 1/2- 
T$other: 14 fs {I7} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant, and it could be for the unresolved doublet of 2288+2291 in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3 from 0+; L+1/2 transfer from analyzing powers. 
$This level is considered as a different level from the 2403 level in (p,n|g), considering that J|p=7/2- would require E2 for 1380|g inconsistent with |g(|q) in (p,n|g), and M3 for 1776.4|g which is not allowed based on RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_comment:
J$1769.8|g (D), |DJ=(1) to (13/2+); 590.9|g (D), |DJ=(1) to (17/2)+; |p=(-) from 1561.1|g from 5916, (19/2-) level. See comments at 5916 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_comment:
J$1561.1|g to (15/2), 570|g to (21/2)+; 317.6|g (D), |DJ=(1) from (21/2-). |p=(-) is assigned based on 653.4|g Q, |DJ=2 from |p=-, which in turn determines |p=(-) for 4355 level with J=(15/2) fed by 1561.1|g from this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2)-
level_comment:
J$1223.4|g E1, |DJ=1 to (21/2)+; 653.4|g Q, |DJ=2 to (19/2), 5916 level. This also determines |p=(-) for 5916 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$others: 640 (1967Bo39); unresolved multiplet of 627, 636, 649 and 694 (1967Fo05) 
S$others: 1.70 (1967Be18), 1.0 (1967Fo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$others: 1680 (1967Bo39), 1640 (1967Fo05) 
S$others: 0.69 (1967Be18) for J=7/2; 0.8 for J=5/2 (1967Fo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$others: 3320+3360 doublet (1967Bo39); 3280 (1967Fo05) 
L,S$from 1967Be18. Others: L=4, C{+2}S=0.66 for J=9/2 for a possible doublet of 3320+3360 (1967Bo39); 0.9 (1967Fo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$note that 6570 and 6571 as two separate levels in 1996HaZV correspond to a single level in ({+18}O,|a2n|g) by 2019Gh09 and ({+16}O,2pn|g) by 1998Si04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$5/2 also from |g(|q) in 1968Bi03 
T$from |t=760 ps {I170} using RDM in 1978Mu02. Other: 0.62 ns {I21} from gT{-1/2}=0.19 ns {I7}, and if g=0.30 (1977Ni01, integral rotation) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$3/2 from 1393|g(|q) and |g(lin pol); 3/2+ is ruled out since it would require a large B(M2)(W.u.) exceeding RUL 
T$from |t=125 fs {I35} (1979Mu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$3/2,5/2 in 1978Me17 based on their 1436.7|g to 3/2- g.s., which is not seen in 1979Mu09. See comments for 1436.7|g 
T$from |t=1000 fs {I300} (1979Mu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$5/2+ and 9/2- from 1327|g(|q) and |g(lin pol); 5/2+ is ruled out since it would require an unreasonably large B(M2)(W.u.) exceeding RUL 
T$from |t<400 fs (1979Mu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$3/2 from 2042|g(|q) and |g(lin pol); 3/2+ ruled out since it would require a large B(M2)(W.u.) exceeding RUL 
T$from |t=20 fs {I10} (1979Mu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$13/2-, 11/2+ from 1123|g(|q) and |g(lin pol); 13/2- is ruled out since it would require an unreasonably large B(M2)(W.u.) exceeding RUL 
T$from |t=420 fs {I130} (1979Mu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+,17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$This level is also confirmed in the |g|g-coin measurement using {+54}Fe({+11}B,np|g) by 1979Mu09 
J$21/2+ is preferred (1979Mu09) 
T$from |t<400 fs (1979Mu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$from 1966Mc15. Others: unresolved triplet of 627+637+650 in 1978Me17; 640 (1968Jo16) 
S$others: 0.27 for L=1 and J=1/2, 0.12 for L=1 and J=3/2, <0.3 for L=3 and J=5/2 (1978Me17); 0.84 for L=1 and J=1/2 (1966Mc15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$others: 1040 {I30} with L=(3+1) (1966Mc15) probably a doublet of 1023+1064; 1040 (1968Jo16) 
L$from 1978Me17. Others: 1(+3) from 1968Jo16, (3+1) from 1966Mc15 
S$from 1978Me17. Others: 0.13 for L=1 component (1968Jo16); 0.7 for L=3 component (1966Mc15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$1064+1066 unresolved doublet (1978Me17) 
L$assumed to be L=3 compolent of L=1+3 for the unresolved doublet (1978Me17) 
S$others: 0.37 for L=3 and J=7/2 component (1978Me17); 0.7 for J=5/2 and L=3 of a possible doublet at 1040 (1966Mc15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$1064+1066 unresolved doublet (1978Me17) 
L$assumed to be L=1 compolent of L=1+3 for the unresolved doublet (1978Me17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$others: 1220 {I30} with L=(3+1) (1966Mc15), 1220 (1968Jo16) 
S$others: 0.63 (1978Me17) and 0.25 (1966Mc15) for L=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 1420 {I30} with L=(3+1) from 1966Mc15 and 1420 with L=1 from 1968Jo16 are likely doublet of 1392 and 1436 levels in 1978Me17 
S$0.06 for L=1 and J=3/2 for a peak at E=1420 (1968Jo16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$from 1966Mc15. Other: 1680 (1968Jo16) 
L$other: (3+1) from 1966Mc15 
S$other: 0.85 for L=3 component (1966Mc15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$from 1966Mc15. Other: 1910 (1968Jo16) 
L$other: (3+1) from 1966Mc15 
S$other: 0.3 for L=3 component (1966Mc15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$from 1966Mc15. Other: 2640 (1968Jo16) 
L$other: (3+1) from 1966Mc15 
S$other: 0.4 for L=3 component (1966Mc15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=3.9283 fm {I15} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+66}Zn,{+64}Zn)=-0.162 fm{+2} {I2} (2013An02) 
$Measured change in isotope shift |d|n({+68}Zn,{+64}Zn)=-141.2 MHz {I12}(stat) {I66}(syst) (2019Xi07, collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE, CERN), with laser wavelength of 480.7254 nm to match the Doppler shifted transition. 
$Measured change in charge radius |d<r{+2}>({+68}Zn,{+64}Zn)=-0.279 fm{+2} {I4}(stat) {I34}(syst) (2019Xi07, collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE, CERN), with laser wavelength of 480.7254 nm to match the Doppler shifted transition. 
J$hyperfine structure measurements: 1929Sc01, 1931Mu02 
T$see footnote for lower limits for double |b decay 
T$ theoretical estimates: 2005Do07, 2000Se12, 1984Ab02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
J$E2 |g to 0+ 
B2$from (p,p'). Others: see (e,e'); (n,n'); (p,p'); (d,d'); ({+3}He,{+3}He') and (|a,|a'). |b{-2}(pol p,p')=0.26, 0.25 (1993Mo15). Negative sign is indicated by 1991Ku30 from an analysis of |s(|q)(|a,|a') data 
MOMM1$from transient fields in Coul. ex. (2005Le12,2010Mo14). Others: +0.89 {I9} (2002Ke02), +0.92 {I20} (1979Fa06), +0.84 {I18}, +1.04 {I24} (1978BeZJ,1979BrZP). 2010Mo14 reanalyzed their previously measured g factor of +0.45 {I3} in 2005Le12 using a different procedure for precession effect, and obtained the same value. Uncertainty of 0.06 in 2010Mo14 increased to 0.14 in 2020StZV evaluation 
MOME2$from electron scattering (1976Ne06,1977Ne05, value of -0.124 {I11} reanalyzed by 1981Ko06 to -0.143 {I21}. Others: -0.32 {I6} or -0.26 {I6} (1988Sa32, reorientation method in Coulomb excitation; -0.135 {I14} ((e,e'), 1972Li12); -0.01 {I+9-5} (Coul. ex., 2003KoZQ) 
T$weighted average of 1.97 ps {I6} (DSA in Coul. Ex.,2005Le12); 1.87 ps {I6} (DSA in Coul. Ex.,2002Ke02); 2.06 ps {I17} ((|g,|g'),1981Ca10); 2.8 ps {I7} (RDDS in ({+16}O,p2n|g),1977Al14); 1.71 ps {I21} (line shape in Coul. ex., 1973Fi15) and 2.16 ps {I15} ((|g,|g'),1971ImZY). Values deduced from B(E2) values in Coul. Ex. and (e,e') are somewhat lower: 1.76 ps {I4} (from B(E2)=0.168 {I4},1988Sa32); 1.82 ps {I10} (from B(E2)=0.162 {I9} and 1.83 ps {I13} from B(E2)=0.161 {I12},1975Th01); 1.73 ps {I15} (from B(E2)=0.170 {I15}, 1962St02). Weighted average of all the values is 1.84 ps 4. 2001Ra27 evaluation quotes 1.86 ps 17 from weighted average of 15 values (B(E2) in Coul. Ex.: 1988Sa32,1975Th01,1962St02,1960An07, 1956Te26; Doppler-shift method in Coul. Ex.: 1973Fi15; Doppler-shift in ({+16}O,p2n|g): 1977Al14; (|g,|g'): 1981Ca10,1977Ca14,1972ArZD,1965Ta13; (e,e'): 1977Ne05,1976Ne06,1970Af04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 0+ 
T$from B(E2)(|^)=0.00170 {I12} ((e,e'), 1977Ne05). Others (from (|a,n|g), ({+11}B,2np|g)): 1.4 ps {I7} (1977Al14), 2.1 ps {I14} (1977We10), 1.8 ps {I+6-3} (1976Ch11), >1.0 ps (1978Si02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E0 transition to 0+ 
T$|gce(t) in (p,p'|g) (1985Pa07). Others (from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g)): 2.4 ps {I+10-6} (1976Ch11), >1.0 ps (1978Si02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from transient fields in Coul. ex. (2005Le12, 2010Mo14 reanalyzed previously measured g factor in 2005Le12 of +0.53 {I16} using a different procedure for precession effect, and obtained g factor=+0.49 {I15}. 
J$|g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) 
$B(E4)=0.00034 {I10} from (e,e') 
T$from DSA method in Coul. ex. (2005Le12). Others: 0.21 ps {I+11-8} ((n,n'|g),1985Ko27); 0.29 ps {I8} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g),1978Si02); 1.0 ps {I6} (1977We10) and 0.8 ps {I3} (1976Le31) in ({+16}O,p2n|g),({+7}Li,2n|g); 0.44 ps {I9} (1976Ch11) in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E0 transition to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 0.15 ps {I+6-3} ((n,n'|g), 1985Ko27); 0.36 ps {I10} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g), 1978Si02); 1.0 ps {I+6-4} ((|a,n|g), 1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$937|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) 
T$from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). Weighted average of 1.2 ps {I3} (1980Si02); 3.5 ps {I21}, 1.7 ps {I7} (1977We10); 3.5 ps {I14} (1977Al14); 2.1 ps {I7} (1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q, lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) 
T$from (n,n'|g) (1985Ko27). Others: >2.6 ps (1976Ch11), >1.0 ps (1978Si02) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from transient fields in Coul. ex. (2005Le12) 
BE3$from (e,e'). Others: see (e,e') and (|a,|a'). 2002Ki06 quote 0.034 {I5} from average of 0.040 {I7} (1976Ne06) and 0.0307 {I23} (1970Af04) 
B3$from (p,p'). Others: see (e,e'); (n,n'); (p,p'); (d,d'); ({+3}He,{+3}He'); (|a,|a'). |b{-3}(pol p,p')=0.22, 0.21 (1993Mo15) 
J$L(e,e')=3. Strong population in (p,p') and other inelastic scattering experiments identifies this as an octupole state 
T$from DSA method in Coul. ex. (2005Le12). Others: 0.097 ps {I21} ((n,n'|g),1985Ko27); 0.080 ps {I21} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g),1978Si02); >1.0 ps (1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) 
T$weighted average of 0.069 ps {I+21-14} ((n,n'|g), 1985Ko27); 0.080 ps {I21} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g), 1978Si02); 0.056 ps {I15}, 0.045 ps {I12} ((|a,n|g), 1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). Also L(p,p')=L(|a,|a')=4. 
T$from DSA in Coul. ex. (2005Le12). Others: 0.42 ps {I+28-10} ((n,n'|g), 1985Ko27); 0.42 ps {I11} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g),1978Si02); 1.0 ps {I3} (({+7}Li,2n|g),1977We10); 1.4 ps {I+10-6} ((|a,n|g), 1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q, lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). J=3 is favored over J=2 
T$weighted average of 0.083 ps {I+21-7} ((n,n'|g), 1985Ko27); 0.087 ps {I21} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g), 1978Si02); 0.13 ps {I3} ((|a,n|g), 1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.14 from 0+ 
T$from DSA in (n,n'|g) (1985Ko27). Others: from (|a,n|g), ({+11}B,2np|g): 0.26 ps {I13} (1980Si02), 0.40 ps {I+21-12} (1976Ch11). Noting a large discrepancy in T{-1/2} results, 1985Ko27 repeated their measurement and obtained a consistent T{-1/2}=0.042 ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) gives 3+ (poor fit for 2+), but a 1295|g to 0+ (reported in (p,|g) and (n,n'|g), not in (|a,n|g), ({+11}B,2np|g)) is inconsistent with J=3 
T$weighted average of 0.16 ps {I+15-6} ((n,n'|g), 1985Ko27); 0.15 ps {I5} (|a,n|g),(({+11}B,2np|g), 1980Si02); 0.33 ps {I+14-8} ((|a,n|g), 1976Ch11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.1 from 0+; |g to 0+ 
T$from (n,n'|g) (1985Ko27). Others (from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g)): 0.042 ps {I14} (1980Si02); 0.014 ps {I8} (1976Ch11). Noting a large discrepancy in T{-1/2} results, 1985Ko27 repeated their measurement and obtained a consistent T{-1/2}=0.4 ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) and L(p,p')=2 
T$from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). Weighted average of 0.23 ps {I7} (1980Si02), 0.31 ps {I7} ((|a,n|g) (1976Ch11)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.04 from 0+ 
T$from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) (1980Si02). Others: 0.026 ps {I+19-15} (1976Ch11), 0.028 ps {I5} (in (|g,|g')) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in ({+11}B,2np|g); but L(p,p')=(1)+2 for a 3367 doublet and L(p,t)=2 for a 3340 group suggest 2+. 
E$there may be an additional 2+ level near this energy as suggested by L(p,t) and L(p,p') 
T$from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) (1980Si02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.63 from 0+ 
T$from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) (1980Si02). Others: <0.010 ps (1976Ch11), 0.044 ps {I11} (in (|g,|g')) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) 
T$from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) (1980Si02). Other: 0.17 ps {I+42-8} (1985Ko27) in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) and |g to 2+; but J=4 inconsistent with a tentative 3551|g to 0+ (in (p,|g)). There may be two different levels near 3552 
T$from 1980Si02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+,6-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$in (p,|g) E=2050 keV, 1980Er05 adopted this energy from (p,p') (1967Br10,1974Au04). This level is most likely different from that in (p,p') (E=3633 {I5} in 1987Ja04) due to different J|p values for the two levels 
J$comparison of measured yield in (p,|g),E=2050 keV with Hauser-Feshbach calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+:4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$0+,1,2,3,4+ from |g to 2+; L(|a,|a')=3 for a 3720 group suggests 3- for 3699 or 3718 
T$from 1980Si02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). Also L(p,p')=5 
T$from 1977Al14. Others: <1.7 ps (1977We10), >0.35 ps (1980Si02). T{-1/2}(3924.7 level) not lower than |?0.7 ps from RUL=1 for B(M2)(W.u.) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5)
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). L(p,t)=(2) is inconsistent. There may be an additional 2+ level near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). Also L(p,p')=6 
T$from 1980Si02. Others: 0.15 ps {I3} (1977We10), <0.14 ps (1976Le31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2 and |g to 4+. L(p,t)=(0) is inconsistent. There may be an additional 0+ level near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g); L(p,p')=4. Assignment of 6+ by 2004Ka18 in ({+28}Si,4p|g) on the basis of |DJ=2 deduced from |g|g(|q) of 1340|g is inconsistent with |g(|q,pol) data for 1340|g in 1980Si02 from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2n2p|g) 
T$from 1980Si02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g from 7-; |DJ=1 |g to (4+); analyzing power in (pol p,p') for a group at 4164 {I10}. 
T$from 1980Si02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). Also L(p,p')=6 
T$from 1980Si02. Others: 1.3 ps {I2} (1977We10), 42 ps {I21} (1977Al14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.44 from 0+; but L(p,p')=1 for a 4453 {I10} group gives negative parity, unless an unnatural parity state is populated in (p,p') 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,lin pol) in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) and L(p,p')=7 
T$weighted average of 105 ps {I13}, 99 ps {I10} (1977We10); 90 ps {I10}, 80 ps {I14} (1977Al14) 
MOMM1$integral PAC method, recoil into gas and vacuum (1983Ba69) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1 |gs to 5- and (5)+. Negative parity proposed in ({+28}Si,4p|g) (2004Ka18), (1998Ga11), but positive parity proposed by 1998Ga11 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_comment:
E,J$only one level proposed by 2004Ka18 in ({+28}Si,4p|g) E=122 MeV. 1998Ga11, 1997Fu08 and 1994Cr05 proposed two levels near this energy with J|p=8+ and 9-, respectively, with the placement of 1144|g from 9-. This placement also proposed by 1978Ne02 in (|a,n|g) and {+56}Fe({+14}N,|apn|g) based on 1144|g(|q) result consistent with |DJ=2, Q |g to 7- level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g); ({+28}Si,4p|g) E=115 MeV; and ({+54}Fe,2p|g), this level corresponds to 5681, 9- where the placement of 1046|g was differently ordered. 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to (9-) 
T$from 1977We10. Other: 4.0 ps {I5} (1977Al14). This half-life was assigned (1977We10,1977Al14) to 5681, 9- level; but with the reassignment of the 1314-1046 cascade, evaluators assign the half-life to 6998 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$proton capture state, E(p)(lab)=2098 keV 
J$|gs to 0+ and 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$average proton-resonance, E(p)=2.1-3.1 MeV range in the c.m. system 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,J$proton resonance state, E(p)=3217 resonance, identified as g{-9/2} IAR of 1546 level in {+64}Cu, with |g decay similar to the decay of 3251 keV resonance (1976Fo06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,J$proton resonance state, E(p)=3251 resonance, identified as g{-9/2} IAR of 1589 level in {+64}Cu; spin from I|g(90|')/I|g(0|') of primary transitions. Parity from decay modes and lack of 3+ in the parent nucleus {+64}Cu 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$proton-resonance state from E(p)(lab)=3.46 MeV and S(p)({+64}Zn)=7713.1 keV {I6} (2021Wa16) 
J$|g rays to 0+ and 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$An 809-keV transition from this level to the 1799-keV level was not observed in |g|g-coin data of 2007Mi12. An upper limit of 0.5% for the intensity from branching ratio I|g(809)/[I|g(809)+I|g(1618|g)], was given by the authors. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$0.34 and 0.18 for different optical parameter sets at E({+6}Li)=28 MeV; and 0.37 at E({+6}Li)=36 MeV (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) data gives minimum |h{+2} for J=4, although |h{+2} for J=6 is only somewhat larger. Possible |g to 2+ supports 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q,pol) give 5+; but |g(|q) data from 1980Si02 and 1978Ne02 disagree in A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients 
$Note that placement of a 999|g from this level, in addition to that from the 3007 level, proposed in 1978Ne02 was rejected by 1980Si02. But in later in-beam studies (2004Ka18,1998Ga11,1994Cr05) a 1000|g is shown to deexcite the 4077 level also 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$other: 42 ps {I21} (1977Al14) is in disagreement. 1980Si02 pointed out that the uncorrected feeding in 1977We10 and 1977Al14 from the 4635 level (T{-1/2}=94 ps) was probably responsible for this discrepancy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
E$with the reassignment of 1046|g in the Adopted dataset, based on results in 2004Ka18, this level corresponds to 6998, (11-) in the Adopted Levels 
J$|g(|q,pol) data give 9- or 7-, but heavy-ion excitation favors 9-. J=8 assignment by 1978Ne02, not supported by 1980Si02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E$from E(p)(lab)=3217 resonance, identified as g{-9/2} IAR of 1546 level in {+64}Cu 
J$|g decay similar to the decay of 3251 keV resonance (1976Fo06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E$from E(p)(lab)=3251 resonance, identified as g{-9/2} IAR of 1589 level in {+64}Cu 
J$from I|g(90|')/I|g(0|') of primary transitions. Parity from decay modes and lack of 3+ in the parent nucleus {+64}Cu 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from 1981Ca10 (probably taken from 1979 Nuclear Data Sheets (1979Ha35)) 
T$from 1981Ca10, 1977Ca14. Others: 2.16 ps {I15} (1971ImZY), 2.8 ps {I4} (1965Ta13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|D<r{+2}>({+66}Zn-{+64}Zn)=0.0225 fm {I30} (1980Wo02), 0.025 fm {I13} (1972Li26), 0.039 fm {I7} (1972Ne01) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+64}Zn-{+62}Ni)=0.0893 fm {I12} (1980Wo02) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+64}Zn-{+60}Ni)=0.132 fm {I20} (1972Li26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.162 {I9} (1977Ne05); 0.155 {I9} (1976Ne06); 0.126 {I9} (1976NeZS); 0.160 {I7}, 0.172 {I14} (1970Af04) 
$|bR=1.10 fm {I3} (1976Ne06); |b{-2}=0.21 (1972Li12); 0.210 {I10} (1970Af04) 
$Q=-0.143 {I21} (data of 1976Ne06,1977Ne05 analyzed by 1981Ko06). Others: -0.124 {I12} (1976Ne06); -0.135 {I16} (1972Li12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$B(E3)|^=0.040 {I7} (1976Ne06); 0.0309 {I18} (1976NeZS); 0.0307 {I23} (average of 0.0323 {I23} and 0.0291 {I15} from 1970Af04) 
$|bR=1.08 fm {I9} (1976Ne06); |b{-3}=0.117 {I6} (1970Af04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|b{-2}=0.260 {I18} (1987Ja04), 0.26, 0.25 (1993Mo15). Other |b{-2}=0.268 (1977Th05), 0.232 (1973Ta03), 0.28 (1973An28), 0.27 or 0.31 (1970Pe09), 0.29 (1968Jo16), 0.235 (1968Le23), 0.243 (1967Ed02), 0.27 or 0.29 (1964Be07), 0.235 (from stiffness parameter given by 1962Ma20). 1992Ke07 give |b{-2}=0.27 to 0.34 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,2+
level_comment:
$|b{-3}=0.235 {I16} (1987Ja04), 0.22, 0.21 (1993Mo15). Other |b{-3}= 0.218 (1977Th05), 0.248 (1973Ta03), 0.19 or 0.22 (1970Pe09), 0.235 (1968Le23), 0.24 (1968Jo16), 0.127 (from stiffness parameter given by 1962Ma20). 1992Ke07 give |b{-3}=0.18, 0.24 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.124-0.185 (1978Ro12); 0.11 (1968Al20); B(E2)(W.u.)=24 (1970Al16), 15.6 (1970Br07) 
S$from 1988Ba71. Others: 1.07 (1988Ba71), 1.2 (1970Al16) 
$|b{-2}=0.19-0.22 (1978Ro12); 0.22 (1975Ba77); 0.15 (1975Al34); 0.19 (1971Go36); 0.22 (1971Al11); 0.21 (1970Br07); 0.19 (1970Al16); 0.18 (1968Go35); 0.20 (1968Fu01); 0.22 (1965Wi04); 0.19 (1960Mc14). 1991Ku30 give |b{-2}=-0.20 from an analysis of (|a,|a') data 
$Angle integrated |s=33 mb {I3} at 12.1 MeV, 28 mb {I1} at 16.1 MeV (2016Or09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E,J$level from 2016Or09 
$Angle integrated |s=10.2 mb {I5} at 12.1 MeV, 13.6 mb {I5} at 16.1 MeV (2016Or09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=27 (1970Al16), 8.6 (1970Br07) 
S$from 1988Ba71. Other: 1.3 (1970Al16) 
$|b{-3}=0.21 (1975Ba77); 0.11 (1975Al34); 0.22 (1971Al11); 0.15 (1970Br07); 0.20 (1970Al16); 0.16 (1968Go35); 0.10 (1960Mc14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$15.42 MeV {I+97-90} (2019Bu26) 
$%EWSR=19 for E1 isoscalar giant dipole resonance (ISGDR) strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$Centroid=15.81|*10{+3} {I+35-27} with %EWSR=120 {I13} and rms width=4.7 MeV {I+22-18} from experimental moments 
$%EWSR=113 for E2 isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance (ISGQR) strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$Centroid=18.5|*10{+3} {I+12-4} with %EWSR=70 {I+14-11} and rms width=5.8 MeV {I+26-11} from experimental moments 
$%EWSR=64 for E0 isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$Centroid=23.3|*10{+3} {I+17-10} with %EWSR=108 {I+27-20} and rms width=8.7 MeV {I+29-19} from experimental moments 
$%EWSR=68 for E1 isoscalar giant dipole resonance (ISGDR) strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.168 {I4} (1988Sa32). Others: 0.112 {I6} (1998Si25), 0.161 {I12} (1975Th01), 0.170 {I15} (1962St02), 0.083 {I17} (1960An07), 0.12 (1959Al95), 0.11 {I2} (1956Te26). 
T$weighted average of 1.97 ps {I6} (2005Le12) and 1.87 ps {I6} (2002Ke02). Other: 1.71 ps {I21} (1973Fi15). For T{-1/2} from B(E2), consult the detailed comments for level half-life for 991.7 level in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
$Q=-0.32 {I6} (constructive interference), -0.26 {I6} (destructive interference) (1988Sa32); -0.01 {I+9-5} (2003KoZQ) 
$g factor=+0.447 {I29} (2005Le12); +0.45 {I3} (2010Mo14, reanalyzed using data from 2005Le12). Others: +0.445 {I46} (2002Ke02), +0.46 {I10} (1979Fa06), +0.42 {I9} (1978BeZJ), +0.52 {I12} (1979BrZP) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.5 ps {I21} for 429.8|g (1977We10), 1.7 ps {I7} for 936.7|g (1977We10), 3.5 ps {I14} (1977Al14, recoil distance) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$5- in 1977Al14 
T$from 1977We10, DSAM. Other: 42 ps {I21} (1977Al14, recoil distance) is in disagreement with other literature values 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 105 ps {I13} for 398.3|g and 99 ps {I10} for 641.3|g (1977We10, recoil-distance method); and 80 ps {I14} (1977Al14, recoil distance) 
$g factor |?0.23 (1983Ba69) from the following measured ratio: g factor (4635, 7- in {+64}Zn): g factor (4074, 6- in {+66}Zn): g factor (4250, 7- in {+66}Zn)=1.00 {I18}:0.64 {I14}:0.60 {I12}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(9-,8) in 1977Al14 
E$with the reassignment of 1046|g in the Adopted dataset, based on results of 2004Ka18, this level corresponds to 6998, (11-) in the Adopted Levels 
T$from 1977We10, DSAM. Other: 4.0 ps {I5} (1977Al14, recoil distance) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 56 fs {I+17-12} from 1207|g, 22 fs {I+21-16} from 2014|g, and 45 fs {I+14-10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_comment:
E$with the reassignment of 1046|g in the Adopted dataset, based on results of 2004Ka18, this level corresponds to 6998, (11-) in the Adopted Levels 
J$|g(|q,pol) data give 9- or 7-, but heavy-ion excitation favors 9-. J=8 assignment by 1978Ne02 not supported by 1980Si02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$level not included in the Adopted Levels since it is not confirmed in other in-beam |g-ray studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$with the reassignment of 1316|g from 5952 level in the Adopted dataset, based on results from 2004Ka18, this level probably corresponds to the 5952 level in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T Weighted average of the following results: 244.0 d {I2} (1972De24), 244.3 d {I4} (1974Cr05), 243.75 d {I12} (1975La16), 243.9 d {I3} (1983Wa26), 244.164 d {I99} (2002Un02), 244.15 d {I10} (2003Lu06), 243.8 d {I3} (2004Va02), and 243.66 d {I9} (2004Sc04). Other results: 245.0 d {I8} (1953To17), 243.5 d {I8} (1957Ge07), 246.4 d {I22} (1957Wr37), 243.1 d {I7} and 244.12 d {I12} (1965An07), 243 d {I4} (1968Ha47), 244.52 d {I7} (1973Vi13), 242.78 d {I19} (1965An07), 244.16 d {I10} (1992Un01). Some of these values may have been superseded, and other are probably affected by systematic uncertainties. 
T from weighted mean of the following 12 values: 245.0 d {I8} (1953To17), 243.5 d {I8} (1957Ge07), 246.4 d {I22} (1957Wr37), 243.1 d {I7} and 244.12 d {I12} (1965An07), 243 d {I4} (1968Ha47), 244.0 d {I2} (1972De24), 244.52 d {I2} (1973Vi13, but |s increased by evaluators to 0.20 as suggested below), 244.3 d {I4} (1974Cr05), 243.75 d {I12} (1975La16), 243.9 d {I3} (1983Wa26), and 244.16 d {I10} (1992Un01). For this average the internal uncertainty is 0.06, the reduced-|h{+2} is 1.72, and the external uncertainty is 0.07. The Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LRSW) analysis (1985ZiZY,1992Ra09) increases this uncertainty to include the most precise value, 244.16. Other values: 242.78 d {I19} (1965An07, not included because it is clearly too low), 4 values from 1972Cr02 which were actually used to identify the origin of the |g rays, 244.2 d {I1} (1982HoZJ, replaced by 1992Un01), and 243.97 d {I8} (1982DeYX, replaced by 1983Wa26).[Evaluated by Dick Helmer]. 
T For the above 12 values plus that of 242.78 d {I19}, the LRSW method increases the uncertainty of the 1973Vi13 value from 0.02 to 0.056 to reduce its relative weight from 89% to 50%. Then, the weighted avergae is 244.22 with a reduced-|h{+2} = 9.2 and an external uncertainty of 0.12. The method of Normalized Residuals (1992Ja06) with all 17 values increases the uncertainties for the four more discrepant values, namely to 242.8 {I6}, 258 {I5}, 244.52 {I21}, and 243.75 {I13} and then the weighted average is 244.06 d {I8}. The RAJEVAL method (1992Ra08) with all 17 values increases the uncertainties for five discrepant values, namely 244.12 {I18}, 242.8 {I8}, 258 {I7}, 244.53 {I25}, and 243.75 {I19} and then the weighted average is 244.09 d {I7}. The adopted value from the LRSW analysis is very similar to these two results, so the adopted value is not dependent on the analysis method. [Evaluated by Dick Helmer]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
|g(|q) of 1733|g in (|a,pn|g) favors 17/2, though 13/2 cannot be ruled out. |p=+ from E2 to 13/2+. 
T from (|a,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_comment:
J=17/2,21/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); J=17/2 is rejected because of resulting B(E2)(W.u.)|<0.3 which is small compared to other transitions in the same cascade. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
J |>(25/2) 
J$from coincidence observation of gammas in the SD band with with |g rays from the 6842, normal deformed level 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T weighted mean of delayed |b{++}|g coincidence measurements 1.65 |ms 5 (1960Au03) and 1.52 |ms {I9} (1975Ro25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From conversion electron |b+ coincidences (1975Ro25). Others: 0.46 ns {I7} (1968Li05), and 0.49 ns {I9} (1971Sh36) from delayed |g|g coincidences. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=7.32 {I10} is in disagreement with adopted J|p=7/2- indicating the presence of unobserved transitions. See {+65}Zn adopted gammas. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J=3/2 consistent with |g(|q) (1975We08) and |g yield (1974Ni01) 
g-factor=-0.70 {I17} from |g(|q,H,t) (1975We08,1978LeZA). Recalculated by the evaluators. See adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J=3/2 consistent with |g(|q) (1975We08) and |g yield (1974Ni01) 
g-factor=+0.63 {I23} from |g(|q,H,t) (1975We08,1978LeZA). Recalculated by the evaluators. See adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2- from |g(|q) and polarization (1978Ko11) 
T from 1977Ch14 at E|a=8.2 MeV. T{-1/2}>1.4 ps from 1978Ko11 at E|a=10.0 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2- from |g(|q) and polarization (1978Ko11); 7/2- from |g(|q), polarization and yield (1974Ni01) 
T from 1977Ch14 at E|a=8.2 MeV. T{-1/2}>1.4 ps at E|a=10.0 MeV (1978Ko11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2- from |g(|q) and polarization (1978Ko11); J=3/2 from yield (1974Ni01) 
T weighted mean of 1.3 ps {I+7-4} at E|a=8.2 MeV (1977Ch14) and 1.5 ps {I+7-4} at E|a=10.0 MeV (1978Ko11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2- from |g(|q) and polarization (1978Ko11) 
T weighted mean of 0.56 ps +24 -16 at E|a=8.2 MeV (1977Ch14) and 0.33 ps {I9} at E|a=10.0 MeV (1978Ko11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 9/2+ from |g(|q) and polarization (1977Lo03); J=9/2 from |g(|q) (1974Ni01) 
g-factor=-0.35 {I10} from |g(|q,H,t) (1975We21,1978LeZA). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 9/2- from |g(|q) and polarization (1978Ko11); 9/2- from |g(|q), polarization and yield (1974Ni01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 13/2+ from |g(|q) and polarization (1977Lo03); 13/2+ from |g(|q), polarization and yield (1974Ni01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2+ from |g(|q) and polarization (1977Lo03); J=11/2 from |g(|q) and yield (1974Ni01); J=11/2 from |g(|q) and yield (1978Ne02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
J|>13/2 from 1173 |g yield (1978Ne02) and J=13/2, 15/2 from observation of |g yield in {+63}Cu(|a,np|g){+65}Zn at E=24-31 MeV (1974Ni01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2
level_comment:
|g(|q) of 1710|g favors both J=17/2 and 21/2; the authors reject J=17/2 because if the 1710|g is assumed to be a 17/2 to 17/2 transition, B(E2)(W.u.) is |<0.3 which is small compared to other transitions in the same cascade. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$weighted average of neutron binding energy for {+65}Zn: 7979.5 {I7} (1974DeYS) and 7979.2 {I8} (1971Ot01) 
J from n capture in J|p=0+ nucleus. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,L,S': from 1963Li06. Level not observed in 1967Vo05. A tentative level is reported at 3450 {I30} in 1965Bo36. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L from DWBA analysis of |s(|q) for a level at 4400 {I40} (1963Li06). 
S': from 1963Li06, recalculated by the evaluators using a normalization factor of 1.53 (1977En02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L from DWBA analysis of |s(|q) for a level at 4780 {I40} (1963Li06). 
S': from 1963Li06, recalculated by the evaluators using a normalization factor of 1.53 (1977En02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J=5/2 
T 1.0 ps<T{-1/2}<18 ps. T{-1/2}>1.0 ps by DSA (1977Ch14). Other: T{-1/2}<18 ps from pulsed-beam delayed |g coincidences (1976Wh01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J: |g(|q) data consistent with J=1/2 or 3/2 (1974Ez01) 
T <26 ps from pulsed-beam delayed |g coincidences (1976Wh01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J=3/2 
T 1.0 ps<T{-1/2}<22 ps. T{-1/2}>1.0 ps by DSA (1977Ch14). Other: T{-1/2}<22 ps from pulsed-beam delayed |g coincidences (1976Wh01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from pulsed-beam delayed |g coincidences (1976Wh01). Other: T{-1/2}>0.46 ps by DSA (1977Ch14), T{-1/2}|<2000 ps from pulsed-beam delayed |g coincidences (1975Ro25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). 
T$from {+65}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Aug 2009 update) 
J$5/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
|m=+0.80 {I8}, transient field integral perturbed angular correlation (tf) (2002Ke02). 
|m=+1.06 {I10}, transient field integral perturbed angular correlation (tf) (2004An14). 
|m=+0.9 {I2}, perturbed angular correlation after ion implantation (IMPAC) (1979Fa06). 
MOME2$from Coulomb excitation (2003Ko51). Other: +0.24 {I9} (2020Ro06, from Coul. ex., preliminary value as stated by authors). Comment added March 30, 2021 by B. Singh 
T weighted average of 1.73 ps {I7} DSAM (2006Le24), 1.68 ps {I3} DSAM (2002Ke02), 1.61 ps {I10} Coul ex. (2003Ko51), 1.74 ps {I11} {+66}Zn(|g,|g') (1998Ba02,1981Ca10,1972Ka22,1972ArZD, 1967Be39), 1.56 ps {I10} Coul ex. (1973Fi15), 1.66 ps {I10} {+66}Zn(e,e') (1977Ne05). Other measurements: 1.3 ps {I8} {+63}Cu(|a,p|g) (1974Iv01), 1.5 ps {I7} {+66}Zn(|a,|a'|g) (1972Yo01), 1.7 ps {I+35-14} {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g), <2 ns {+66}Cu |b{+-} decay (1953En06). 
Isotope shift: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=3.9496 {i13} (2004An14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T others: <1.4 ps from (|a,|a'|g), and 0.83 ps {I+35-21} from {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g), 1.7 ps {I5} (2003Ko51). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 4 from |g(|q) in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from E2 |g to 2+. 
T weighted average of 0.19 ps {I6} (|a,p|g), 0.76 ps {I14} Coul ex. (2006Le24), and 0.35 ps {I2} Coul. ex. (2003Ko51). 
Others: 0.83 ps {I+42-28} from (|a,2n|g),0.19 ps {I6} from (|a,p|g), 0.17 ps {I+5-3} from (n,n'|g), and <0.7 ps from (|a,|a'|g). 
|m=+2.6 {I8}, transient field integral perturbed angular correlation (tf) (2004An14). 
|m=+2.6 {I8}, from |g-factor=+0.65 {I20} in Coul. ex. (2006Le24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)
level_comment:
E possible doublet indicated by conflicting parity measurements. 
J (1-,3-) from proton-capture yield in {+65}Cu(p,|g); (2-,3-) from L=(0) for a level at 2704 in {+67}Zn(d,t); (3+) from Hauser-Feshbach analysis in {+66}Zn(p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 4 from |g(|q) in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from L(p,p')=4 
T by DSA from {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g). Other: >2.1 ps by DSA from {+63}Cu(|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T From Coul. ex. (2006LeZU). 
T Others: 0.18 ps {I4} from {+66}Zn(|a,|a'|g), 0.23 ps {I14} from {+63}Cu(|a,p|g), and 0.17 ps {I4} from (n,n'|g). Other: 1.0 ps {I+6-3} from {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g). 
|m=+2.1 {I9}, transient field integral perturbed angular correlation (tf) (2004An14). 
|m=+2.1 {I9}, from |g-factor=+0.7 {I3} in Coul. ex. (2006Le24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Coul. ex. (2006Le24). 
T 1.7 ps {I+10-3} in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g), 0.5 ps {I+3-2} in (|a,p|g), 0.13 ps {I+56-10} in (|a,|a'|g), and 0.09 ps {I+5-3} in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g) 
J from log| {Ift}=6.14 {I4} in |e decay from 0+ and |g to 0+; |p=+ from M1,E2 to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$other: 42 fs {I+21-14} from DSA in (n,n'|g) 
J 1 from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|g,|g'); |p from L(p,p')=(1) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 0,1,2- from log| {Ift}=7.03 {I4} in |e decay from 0+; J=0 ruled out by |g to 0+, J|p=2- ruled out by T{-1/2}; |p=(-) from L(p,p')=(1) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
Lower J|p member of a J|p=(2+)+(4+) level doublet at 3737 {I10} reported in {+64}Zn(t,p). 
J J|p=(2+) from L(t,p)=(2) not adopted for this lower J|p member of 3737 {I10} doublet since J=1 from |g(|q) and reduced dipole |g rays in {+66}Zn(|g,|g') reported for a 3739.1 level. 
T from (|g,|g') with |G{-|g0}/|G=0.75 {I3} from adopted gammas 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5 from |g(|q) in {+64}Ni(|a,2pn|g); |p from E2 to 3-. 
T by recoil distance in {+55}Mn({+14}N,np|g). DSA measurements of 0.8 ps {I+11-4} from {+63}Cu(|a,p|g) and 6 ps {I+14-3} from {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g) do not take fully into account strong feeding from the 4252 (T{-1/2}=133 ps {I11}) and 4076 (T{-1/2}=29.8 ps {I14}) levels. Other: 0.21 ps {I+14-7} from (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$By recoil into gas and or vacuum (RIGV) (1983Ba69). 
MOME2$From electron scattering (Es); recalculated value (1981Ko06). 
T by recoil distance in {+55}Mn({+14}N,2pn|g). Other: >1.4 ps from (|a,p|g). 
J (6) from |g(|q), |g yields and decay systematics in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from (M1) to 5-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|p=+ from L(p,d)=1 for a level at 4100 {I30}; |p=- from L(p,p')=3 for a level at 4110 {I10}, indicating a possible doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J (6) from |g(|q) and |g yields in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from (E2) to 4+. L(p,p')=4 at 4189 {I7} 
T unweighted mean of DSA measurements 0.08 ps {I+6-4} in {+63}Cu(|a,p|g) and 0.21 ps {I+10-3} in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E unresolved doublet in (|a,{+2}He) at 4220 {I50}; L=7 assigned to the main level at 4220 with a tentative L=5 assigned to the 4400 level visible at some backward angles. 
MOMM1 From recoil into gas and/or vacuum (RIGV) (1981Ko06). 
J (7) from |g(|q) and |g yields in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from (E2) to 5-. 
T by recoil distance in {+55}Mn({+14}N,2pn|g). Other: >0.55 ps in (|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
configuration from ({+12}C,{+10}Be), ({+12}C,{+10}C) reaction where this level is seen strongly excited (1990Bo27). This level was seen weakly excited in the (|a,{+2}He) reaction (1990Fi07) 
J (8) from |g(|q), |g yields and decay systematics in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from (E2) to (6)+ 
T by DSA in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J (9) from |g(|q) in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g); |p from (E2) to (7-). 
T by recoil distance in {+55}Mn({+14}N,2np|g). T{-1/2}=2.8 ps {I+21-14} by DSA in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E 2453.5 {I11} from 1974Iv01. 
T weighted mean of 0.28 ps {I11} (1981Zh07) and 0.15 ps {I8} (1974Iv01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E 2830.3 {I16} from 1974Iv01. 
T by DSA from 1974Iv01. T{-1/2}=0.6 ps {I+3-2} by DSA from 1981Zh07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E 2943 {I3} from 1974Iv01. 
T from 1974Iv01. Other: T{-1/2}<0.07 ps (1981Zh07) 
L (1+4) from inspection of |s(|q) (1970Bu13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
T 0.8 ps {I+11-4} by DSA from 1981Zh07, but cannot take fully into account feeding from the 4076 (T{-1/2}>1.4 ps) and 4252 (T{-1/2}>0.5 ps) levels. T{-1/2}=46 ps {I3} from adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J J=2, 4 from |g(|q) (1977Ne04). J=2 ruled out by feeding from J|p=5- level at 3745. |p=- unlikely because deexciting |g's would require large M2 components. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J J=5 from |g(|q) (1977Ne04,1975Br25); |p=- from E2 to 3- level 
T 6 ps {I+14-3} by DSA |g line-shape analysis (1977Mo20) but does not take fully into account strong feeding from the 4250 and 4074 levels which have T{-1/2}=133 ps {I10} and 29.8 ps {I14} (1982Cl02), respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G g(4635, {+64}Zn):g(4074)=1.00 {I18}:0.64 {I14} (1983Ba69); ratio of the absolute values determined 
J J|p=(6-) favored from |g(|q) and |g yields (1977Ne04,1975Br25) and T{-1/2} (1982Cl02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J J=(6) favored by 1975Br25 from |g(|q), |g yields, and |g- decay systematics. |p from (E2) to 4+ level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G g(4635, {+64}Zn):g(4250)=1.00 {I18}:0.60 {I12} (1983Ba69); ratio of the absolute values determined 
J J|p=(7-) favored from |g(|q) and |g yields (1977Ne04,1975Br25) and T{-1/2} (1982Cl02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J J|p=(9-) favored by 1977Ne04 and 1975Br25 from |g(|q), T{-1/2}, and |g-decay systematics. 
T 2.8 ps {I+21-14} by DSA |g line-shape analysis (1977Mo20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J yield of 1225|g favors J>10 (1977Ne04) 
T uncertainty has been increased by the evaluators to include an uncertainty of 15% in the stopping powers. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E unresolved doublet; data include a small contribution from a level at about 4400 visible at some backward angles. L=7 assigned to the main level at 4220 with a tentative L=5 assigned to the 4400 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-
level_comment:
WIDTH |>2.3 eV {I2}, |<8 eV {I2} (1973Kn02) 
E from E(p) above threshold=148.4 eV {I9} (1973Kn02); and {+65}Cu(p,n) reaction Q=2134.4 {I3} (2003Au03) 
J from measurement of n(|q) isotropic within 10% (1973Kn02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Transition dominated by transferred proton p{-3/2-}; though an admixture of p{-1/2-} is not excluded (1976Wo02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from |G=0.262|*10{+-3} eV {I16}; this is the weighted average of 0.243|*10{+-3} eV {I21} (1981Ca10), 0.33|*10{+-3} eV {I9} (1967Be39), 0.30|*10{+-3} eV {I4} (1972Ka22), and 0.27|*10{+-3} eV {I3} (1972ArZD) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0}=1.2|*10{+-3} eV {I3} (1972Me14); |G{-|g0}/|G=0.77 {I4} (1971Ca14) 
J 2 from resonance fluorescence yield (1972Me14), (1) from |g(|q) (1968Sh14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0}=24|*10{+-3} eV {I3} (1972Me14) 
T calculated with |G{-|g0}/|G=0.75 {I3} from adopted gammas 
J 1 from |g(|q) (1972Me14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0}=0.22 eV {I2} (1969Sh10); |G{-|g0}/|G=0.71 (1968Sh14) 
T from |G=0.31 eV {I3} (1969Sh10) 
J 1 from |g(|q) (1968Sh14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G=0.21 eV {I4} (1970Sc27); |G{-|g0}=0.10 eV {I2} (1970Sc27) 
J 1 from |g(|q) (1973Sz02) 
T calculated from measured |G (1970Sc27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
B(E2): inconsistent with adopted T{-1/2}=0.19 ps {I7} and upper limit on branching ratio of g.s. transition (branching<0.23%) which gives B(E2)<1.5|*10{+-4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
B2 0.19 (1970Al16), 0.22 (1971Al11), 0.220 (1990Bu25), 0.217 (1990Bu25); the two values from 1990Bu25 are from DWBA and coupled-channels analysis, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 1.73 ps {I7} DSAM (2006Le24); 1.68 ps {I3} DSAM (2002Ke02), and 1.61 ps {I10} Coul. ex.. (2003Ko51). T{-1/2}=1.68 ps {I4}, deduced by evaluators from B(E2)|^=0.139 {I3}. Other value: 1.56 ps {I10} DSAM (1973Fi15). 
Weighted average of B(E2)|^=0.1380 {I25} (2006Le24), B(E2)|^=0.144 {I9} (2003Ko51), B(E2)|^=0.135 {I8} (1998Si25), B(E2)|^=0.154 {I13} (1975Th01), and B(E2)|^=0.145 {I13} (1962St02). 
MOME2$from Coulomb excitation (2003Ko51). Other: +0.24 {I9} (2020Ro06, from Coul. ex., preliminary value as stated by authors). Comment added March 30, 2021 by B. Singh 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Other value: 0.35 ps {I2} Coul. ex.. (2003Ko51) 
$ The g value agrees with +0.53 {I16} for the first 4+ state in {+64}Zn but differs greatly from -0.37 {I17} for the first 4+ state in {+68}Zn. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Quadruple shape invariant <Q{+2}>=0.143 e{+2}b{+2} {I8} 
$<Q{+3}cos(3|d)>=-0.039 {I14}, <cos(3|d)>=-0.7 {I3}, <|g>=44|' {I8} 
$Shape deformation parameter <|b>=0.224 {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
T$taken from literature by 2021Ro04 and used to normalize the Coulomb-excitation cross sections and, therefore, should not be considered as a result of this work (2021Ro24). 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 0+,g.s.)=37.2, used to normalize Coulomb-excitation cross sections and should not be considered as a result of this work (2021Ro04) 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=+32 efm{+2} {I12} 
$Spectroscopic quadrupole moment Q{-s}=+24 efm{+2} {I9} 
$Quadruple shape invariant <Q{+2}>=0.13 e{+2}b{+2} {I3} 
$Shape deformation parameter <|b>=0.21 {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Diagonal E2 matrix element<0 efm{+2} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 2+,1039)=53 efm{+2} {I10} 
$Transitional M1 matrix element (to 2+,1039)=-0.18 |m{-N} {I+3-5} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 0+,g.s.)=0.48 efm{+2} {I+5-7} 
$Q{-s}<0 efm{+2} (2021Ro04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 2+,1039)=6.9 efm{+2} {I12} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 2+,1873)=-5.1 efm{+2} {I10} 
$Quadruple shape invariant <Q{+2}=0.0074 e{+2}b{+2} {I19} 
$Shape deformation parameter <|b>=0.051 {I7} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Diagonal E2 matrix element>0 efm{+2} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 2+,1039)=34 efm{+2} {I3} 
$Q{-s}>0 efm{+2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 4+,2451)=(25-60) efm{+2} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 2+,1873)=+9 efm{+2} {I+2-5} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 2+,1039)=2.7 efm{+2} {I+12-9} 
$Transitional E2 matrix element (to 0+,g.s.)=-6.4 efm{+2} {I5} 
$Transitional M1 matrix element (to 2+,1039)=+0.14 |m{-N} {I+13-9} 
$Transitional M1 matrix element (to 2+,1873)=+0.33 |m{-N} {I13} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T weighted average of 9.34 |ms {I20}(1998At04),9.01 |ms {I3}(1996Hw03), 9.1 |ms {I4}(1975Ro25),9.20 |ms {I7}(1973Le18),9.15 |ms {I5}(1972Le37). 
J=1/2 from circular polarization data in polarized neutron capture; |p=- from L(d,p)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T other: 0.38 ps {I+24-10} from {+67}Zn(n,n'|g) 
J=5/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); |p=- from M1 to 3/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T others: 0.43 ps {I+28-14} from (n,n'|g); 0.20 ps {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
J=7/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); |p=- from E2 to 3/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T other: 0.69 ps {I35} from (n,n'|g) 
J=5/2 from |g(|q) and linear polarization data in (|a,n|g); |p=- from M1 to 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+),3/2,5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 43 fs {I11} from (|a,n|g) and 46 fs {I10} from (n,n'|g); the uncertainty on the (n,n'|g) value has been increased by a factor of 10 by the evaluator. 
J from |g transitions to 1/2- and 3/2-; |p=(+) from L(d,t)=(0) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G Others: +0.25 {I8} (1968Li02), +0.23 {I8} (1971Re01) 
T unweighted average of 1.06 ns {I4} (1975Ro25) and 1.026 ns {I14} (1972En08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
T 0.49 ps {I+7-6} (1978Ku05); 0.21 ps {I6} (1978Lo06) 
J 9/2- from |g(|q) and linear polarization of 1517|g (1978Lo06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
T 0.20 ps {I5} (1978Lo06); 0.42 ps {I+2-1} (1978Ku05) 
J=3/2, 7/2 from |g(|q) of 769|g; J=3/2 rejected because of unacceptable M2 strength (1978Lo06); |p=- from M1 to 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1/2 from |g(|q) and linear polarization data of 1284|g and 1584|g; however, J=3/2 cannot be rejected (1978Lo06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J 1/2- from circular polarization and L(d,p) (1975DeYM); J=1/2 from |g-ray circular polarization (1971Kn06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J 3/2- from circular polarization and L(d,p) (1975DeYM); J=1/2, (3/2) from |g-ray circular polarization (1971Kn06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J 3/2- from circular polarization and L(d,p) (1975DeYM); J=3/2 from |g-ray circular polarization (1971Kn06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E unresolved doublet formed by 1642 and 1676 levels though the main contribution is from the 1676 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E unresolved doublet formed by 1782 and 1808 levels though the main contribution is from the 1808 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from 2014Di03, weighted average of 9.144 |ms {I23} (from |b|b(t) between prompt and delayed events in the proportional counter), 9.22 |ms {I6} (from |b|g(t) between prompt events in the proportional counter and delayed events in the NaI(Tl) counter) and 9.22 |ms {I12} (from |b|g(t) between prompt events in the proportional counter and delayed events in the HPGe detector). Other: 9.07 |ms {I4} from Adopted Levels of {+67}Zn in ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). 
$|m=+0.875479 {I9} from literature used as reference for other Zn isotopes 
J$from {+67}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (April 2005 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from fast timing measurement using slope method (2022Ms01) with 209|g as start and 184.6|g as stop signal. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 1.48 ps {I8} from B(E2)|^ in (e,e'), 1.68 ps {I11} from Coul. Ex., and 1.62 ps {I2} from DSAM in Coul. Ex.:Proj. Others: 1.50 ps {I14} from B(E2)|^ in (d,d'), 1.88 ps {I16} from (|g,|g') (1981Ca10) and 0.90 ps {I21} from DSAM in Coul. Ex. (1974Iv01). 
MOMM1$from C-|g(|q,H,t) in Coul. Ex.: Projectile. Others +1.0 {I2} from transient field (1978BeZJ) and +0.9 {I3} from IMPAC (1979Fa06). 
MOME2$from (e,e') (1981Ko06). Other: +0.09 {I3} from GOSIA analysis of multi-step Coul. ex. (2004Ko03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 103 ps {I18} from B(E2)|^ in Coul. Ex.:Projectile and 70 ps {I35} from centroid-shift measurement in (p,p'|g) 
J$L(p,t)=L(t,p)=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 
T$from DSAM in Coul. Ex.:Projectile. Others: 1.6 ps {I3} from B(E2)|^ in (e,e'), 1.47 ps {12} from B(E2)|^ in Coul. Ex.:Projectile, >0.11 ps from DSAM in (|a,p|g). 
MOMM1$from C-|g(|q,H,t) in Coul. Ex.: Projectile. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM in Coul. Ex.:Projectile. Others: 0.24 ps {I+11-6} from DSAM in (n,n'|g) and 0.043 ps {I4} from B(E2)|^ in Coul. Ex.:Projectile 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J from L(p,t)=L({+6}Li,d)=4 
T$weighted average of 0.76 ps {I6} (2005Le12) and 0.82 ps {I6} (2005Le38) from DSAM in Coul. Ex.: Projectile and 0.60 ps {I6} (2004Ko03) from B(E2)|^ in Coul. Ex.:Projectile. 
MOMM1$from C-|g(|q,H,t) in Coul. Ex.: Projectile. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM in Coul. Ex.:Projectile. Others: 0.45 ps {I+14-8} from DSAM in (n,n'|g) and 0.42 ps {I14} from DSAM in Coul. Ex. 
BE3$0.038 {I8} from (e,e') and 0.0220 {I17} from (d,d'). 
MOMM1$from C-|g(|q,H,t) in Coul. Ex.: Projectile. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=(1) for E=3168 {I5} and L(|a,|a')=(5) for E=3170 {I30} discrepant. 
E$possible multiplet of levels in this region. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$J from |g|g(|q) in (|g,|g'); |p from L(d,{+3}He). L(p,t)=(0) for 3345 discrepant. 
T$Other: 15 fs {I+7-6} from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$D transition to 5- and yield function favor J=6; |p from L(d,p)=4. 
T$upper limit from |g|g(t) of 152|g in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$J=6 from yield function in (|a,p|g); |p from |g to 4+. L(t,p)=(5) for 3682 {I10} discrepant. 
E$possible multiplet of levels in this region. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 for a level at 3701; however, L(t,p)=0+4 for a level at 3712 {I10}. |g's to 2+ and 0+ favor J=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1,2+
level_comment:
T$adopted value of |G{-o}/|G=0.63 {I4} gives T{-1/2}=22 fs {I+8-5} for J=1 and 35 fs {I+11-6} for J=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
J$J from L(t,p)=(3); |p from L(d,p)=4. 
E$weighted average of 3806 {I10} from (t,p) and 3815 {I4} from (d,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$upper limit from |g|g(t) of 332|g in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 
J$L(|a,{+2}He)=(7), L(d,p)=4. This conflicts with yield function and |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g) which suggests J|p=(8-). 
$Configuration: (f{-5/2}g{-9/2}){-7-} (1990Fi07,1985Ja02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+)
level_comment:
J$4028|g to g.s., 1277|g to 3-, primary |g from 2-,3- capture state 
E$doublet in (d,p) with L=(4)+(1) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_comment:
J$1+ to 4+ from L(d,p)=1 and 3+,4+,5+ from L(p,p')=4 . 
E$weighted average of 4396 {I10} from (d,p) and 4389 {I10} from (p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
J$L(|a,{+3}He)=(8); E2(+M3) 709|g to the (6+) 3688 level and the yield function of the 709|g. 
$Configuration: (g{-9/2}){+2} (1990Fi07,1985Ja02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
J$based on observed feeding into known levels, the estimated spin of the lowest level in the super-deformed band is 17 {I2} (1999De20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from adopted levels 
T$from |G in 1981Ca10. Value apparently supersedes the authors' earlier value in 1977Ca14. Others: 1.41 ps {I+18-16} from |G (1972ArZD), 1.9 ps {I1} (1977Ca14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1,2+
level_comment:
J$(1) from |g(|q) (1972Me14) 
T$adopted value of |G{-o}/|G=0.63 {I4} gives T{-1/2}=22 fs {I+8-5} for J=1 and 35 fs {I+11-6} for J=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2): value of 1977Ne05 supersedes authors' earlier work (1976Ne06). Other: 0.108 {I14} (1973Li24). 
$Q: data of 1977Ne05 analyzed by 1981Ko06 to extract quadrupole moment of 1077 level using a model independent method based on energy-weighted sum rule 
T$deduced from B(E2) and adopted |g-ray properties. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{-2}=0.220 {I15} (1987Ja05); Others: 0.217 (1968Le23), 0.19 (1970Pe09), 0.186 (1973Ta03), -0.19 (1980Fa07), 0.240 {I18} (1992Ke07), 0.21 (1993Mo15) 
$|b{-2}R=1.12 {I8} (1987Ja05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{-3}=0.225 {I16} (1987Ja05); Others: 0.217 (1968Le23), 0.17 (1970Pe09), 0.202 (1973Ta03), 0.220 {I17} (1992Ke07), 0.21 (1993Mo15) 
$|b{-3}R=1.14 {I8} (1987Ja05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2): 0.130 {I12} (1969Jo01) 
$|b{-2}: 0.23 (1969Jo01), 0.22 {I4} (1971Du09), 0.205 (1971Ha45), 0.170 (1992Ra31) 
$1971Ha45 deduce |b{-2} values in the range 0.150 to 0.205 for several sets of optical model potentials and parameters. Becchetti's surface potential gives |b{-2}=0.205 and an overall better fit than others. 
BE2$calculated from |b{-2} and thus model dependent. Uncertainties are statistical only. 
T$deduced from B(E2) and adopted |g-ray properties. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$B(E3): 0.0220 {I17} (1969Jo01) 
$|b{-3}: 0.198 (1969Jo01), 0.170 (1971Ha45). 
$1971Ha45 deduce |b{-3} values in the range 0.130 to 0.170 for several sets of optical model potentials and parameters. Becchetti's surface potential gives |b{-3}=0.170 and an overall best fit. 
BE2$calculated from |b{-2} and thus model dependent. Uncertainties are statistical only. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted av of 1.86 ps {I13} from B(E2)|^ (1998Si25), 1.56 ps {I14} from B(E2)|^ (1962St02) and 1.57 ps {I16} (1973Fi15) from DSAM. Other: 0.90 ps {I20} (1974Iv01) from DSAM. 
BE2$weighted average of 0.125 {I11} (1962St02) and 0.105 {I7} (1998Si25). B(E2)=0.1211 {I15} from the adopted T{-1/2} in the Adopted Levels. 
G$0.62 {I12} (1979BrZP). Other: 0.38 {I15} (1979Fa06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average from DSAM of 1.61 ps {I5} (2002Ke02), 1.61 ps {I4} (2005Le12), 1.62 ps {I3} (2005Le38) 
G$weighted average of +0.61 {I6} (2010Mo14), +0.54 {I6} (2007Bo04), +0.58 {I6} (reanalysis of data from 2005Le38 by 2010Mo14), +0.51 {I4} (reanalysis of data from 2005Le12 by 2010Mo14). Other: +0.44 {I5} (2002Ke02). 
MOME2$from GOSIA analysis of |g-ray yields in 2004Ko03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced from B(E2) and adopted |g-ray properties. 
BE2$for 1077(2+) to 1656(0+) excitation (2004Ko03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average from DSAM of 0.97 ps {I7} (2005Le12) and 1.04 ps {I7} (2005Le38). Other: 1.47 ps {I12} from B(E2)|^ (2004Ko03). 
G$weighted average of +0.54 {I19} (2010Mo14), +0.6 {I3} (2007Bo04), +0.56 {I18} (reanalysis of data from 2005Le38 by 2010Mo14), +0.56 {I18} (reanalysis of data from 2005Le12 by 2010Mo14). 
BE2$for g.s to 1883(2+) excitation (2004Ko03). 
$B(E2)(1077 to 1883)=0.030 {I6} (2004Ko03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average from DSAM of 0.31 ps {I3} (2005Le12) and 0.32 ps {I4} (2005Le38). Other: 0.043 ps {I4} from B(E2)|^ (2004Ko03). 
BE2$for g.s to 2338(2+) excitation (2004Ko03). 
$B(E2)(1077 to 2338)=0.016 {I5} (2004Ko03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.76 ps {I6} from DSAM (2005Le12), 0.82 ps {I6} from DSAM (2005Le38) and 0.60 ps {I6} from B(E2)|^ (2004Ko03). 
G$weighted average of +0.23 {I43} (2010Mo14), +0.6 {I3} (2007Bo04), +0.15 {I34} (reanalysis of data from 2005Le38 by 2010Mo14), -0.04 {I18} (reanalysis of data from 2005Le12 by 2010Mo14). 
BE2$for 1077(2+) to 2417(4+) excitation (2004Ko03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average from DSAM of 0.256 ps {I7} (2005Le38) and 0.263 ps {I14} (2005Le12). 
G$weighted average of +0.4 {I3} (2005Le12) and +0.3 {I4} (2007Bo04). Other: +0.3 {I4} (2005Le38). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$D(+Q) 152|g to 5- and the yield function of the 152|g favor J=6 
T$Upper limit from |g|g(t) measurement of 152|g in 1976Br23. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$1976Br23 assign (8-) based on (Q) 332|g to (6)- and the yield function of the 332|g. 
T$Upper limit from |g|g(t) measurement of 332|g in 1976Br23. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$L=1 qualitatively similar in ({+6}Li,d) (1979Ba11). 
$|s{+max} (|mb/sr) = 18 {I4} for L=4 and 32 {I7} for L=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
E$unresolved from 3940 {I50} level for angular distribution analysis. 
$Suggested configuration: (|np{-1/2}|ng{-9/2}){-5-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
E$unresolved from 3740 {I50} level for angular distribution analysis. 
$Suggested configuration: (|nf{-5/2}|ng{-9/2}){-7-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Likely doublet consisting of 8+ and 6+ levels. 
$J|p=6+ configuration of (|ng{-9/2}|n2d{-5/2}){-6+}, J|p=8+ configuration of (|ng{-9/2}){+2}{-8+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{-2}: 0.18 (1965Wi04), -0.20 (1968Go35), 0.16 (1971Al18), -0.23 (1971Go36), 0.20 (1975Ba77), 0.220 (1990Bu25, DWBA), 0.206 (1990Bu25, coupled channel) 
S$Other: 0.886 (harmonic vibrational model), 1.015 (asymmetric rotor model) both from 1988Ba71 coupled channel calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
S$for E2 strength (ISGQR) 
$Centroid=15.54|*10{+3} {I32} with %EWSR=60 {I10} and rms width=3.2 MeV {I+12} from experimental moments 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
S$for E0 strength (ISGMR) 
$Centroid=16.57|*10{+3} {I+20-14} with %EWSR=105 {I+11-10} and rms width=4.8 MeV {I+11-8} from experimental moments 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 55.6 m {I16} (1969Zo01), 55 m 1 (1968Ma12), 57 m 2 (1939Li02), and 58.5 m 12 (1956Ru45). Others: 51 m (1948Ho04), 52.5 m (1967Vi08), 52 m (1949Ha17) and 57 m 4 (1958Gu09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%IT,%B-$From %|b{+-}=0.033 {I3} (1970Ra08) 
MOMM1$from NMR on oriented nuclei. Compiled by 2011StZZ 
MOME2$ from static nuclear orientation with gamma detection. Compiled by 2011StZZ 
T$From 1977He20 in {+69}Zn IT Decay. Others: 13.59 h {I18} (2006Ab30) and 13.76 h {I3} (1974Ro18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$1/2-,3/2-,5/2- from allowed log {Ift}=4.82 {I8} from 3/2- in {+69}Cu |b{+-} decay, strong neutron-capture |g feeding from 1/2+ excludes 5/2-. Circular polarization of primary |g in polarized neutron capture rules out 1/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2
level_comment:
J$1/2,3/2,5/2+ from primary |g transition from 1/2+ neutron capture level; |g to 1/2- g.s. rules out 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$3/2- or 5/2+ from L transfer and vector analyzing power data in {+68}Zn(pol d,p); roughly equal feedings to 1/2- and 5/2- levels rule out 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$Possibly unresolved from 2919 in 1981Bi06; however cross section and analyzing power data show L=2 and J|p=5/2+ for a peak associated by the authors with the 2912 level of 1967Vo05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2+
level_comment:
L$L=1 (1967Vo05). L=1,2 (1981Bi06). Data of 1981Bi06 do not unambiguously distinguish between L=1 or L=2, although L=1 is favored. Vector analyzing power data in {+68}Zn(pol d,p) suggest J|p=3/2- or 5/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Unresolved state in 1981Bi06. However cross section and analyzing power data show L=2 and J|p=5/2+ in the vicinity of 2.92 MeV. L=2 in 1967Vo05 at 2.912 MeV and L=1 in 1975Is04 at 2.919 MeV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Kr01 from decay curves for 438.6|g. This value can be compared to 13.756 h {I18} in {+69}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 
$Decay modes from {+69}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01) 
J$9/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 
T$other: 13.742 h {I14} (2017Kr01: Appl. Rad. and Isot. 121, 28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
T$from 2011Be39 for 2|n2|b{+-} decay; also determined T{-1/2}|>3.2|*10{+19} for 0|n2|b{+-} decay. Others: |>2.3|*10{+17} for 2|n2|b{+-} decay and |>1.8|*10{+19} for 0|n2|b{+-} decay (2010Be41, 2010BeZO, 2009Be27, earlier results by same group as 2011Be39), |>2.2|*10{+17} (2007Bl15, 2006Zu02), |>1.3|*10{+16} for 2|n2|b{+-} decay and |>0.7|*10{+18} for 0|n2|b{+-} decay (2005Da47), |>1.3|*10{+16} (2003Ki08), >4.8|*10{+14} y (1952Fr23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from transient field technique in Coulomb Excitation. Others: +0.76 {I8} (2002Ke02), 0.82 {I20} (1979BrZP), 0.60 {I18} (1977HaZW), all from transient field technique in Coulomb Excitation, and 0.60 {I14} (1979Fa06) from IMPAC. 
T$weighted average of 3.67 ps {I21} from DSAM and 3.60 ps {I35} from RDDS, both in Coulomb Excitation. Others: 3.7 ps {I12} from RDDS in {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g), 2.5 ps {I2} from B(E2)=0.205 {I19} in (e,e'), 3.3 ps {I3} from B(E2)=0.160 {I14} in Coulomb Excitation. 
J$L(t,p)=2 
MOME2$from (e,e'); extracted using anharmonic-vibrator model and is model dependent. 
B2$from (pol p,p'). Other: 0.220 from (|a,|a'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2, L(d,{+3}He)=1(+3), strong population in Coulomb excitation 
T$from DSAM in Coulomb Excitation. Others: 1.4 ps {I4} from B(E2)=0.0050 {I13} from (e,e'), 0.24 ps {I+24-12} from DSAM in (n,n'|g) 
MOMM1$from transient field technique in Coulomb excitation. Other: +0.84 {I38} from reanalysis of transient field data (2010Mo14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=4 
T$weighted average of 2.0 ps {I+9-11} from RDDS in {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g) and 3.4 ps {I8} from RDDS in Coulomb Excitation. Other: 1.32 ps {I14} from DSAM in Coulomb Excitation (2009Mu06). 
MOMM1$from transient field technique in Coulomb excitation. Other: +0.84 {I52} from reanalysis of transient field data (2010Mo14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM in (n,n'|g) 
J$from L(d,{+3}He)=1+3 and J=2 from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 2004Va08 in {+70}Cu |b{+-} decay (33 s) assign (3+) to this level, however, this is unlikely given its direct population in Coulomb excitation. L(p,p')=(0) is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=3; analyzing power consistent with 3- in (pol p,p') 
B3$from (pol p,p') 
T$from DSAM in Coulomb Excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, L(t,p)=(5), population in Coulomb Excitation makes J|p=4- or 6- unlikely. J|p=4- proposed in (n,n'|g) based on population strength and J|p=4+ proposed in {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,X|g). 
T$from DSAM in Coulomb Excitation 
$Configuration=((|p 2p{-3/2}){+2}(|n 2p{-1/2}){+-1}(|n 1g{-9/2})) (2004Va08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4+)
level_comment:
J$strong |b feeding from J|p=3- parent, 209|g to 5-, 708|g to 2+ 
E$possibily the same as the 3235-keV level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5,6,7-)
level_comment:
J$assigned as 2+ in 2004Va08. However, direct feeding from 6- parent and 963|g to 5- makes J=2 unlikely. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(3+) in 2004Va08 is in conflict with adopted value which is based on 2538|g (not reported here) to 0+ and direct population in Coulomb Excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{-2}R: other: 0.868 (harmonic vibrational model) and 0.815 (asymmetric-rotor model) (1988Ba71) 
E$other: 880 {I30} (1971Al18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.67 ps {I21} from DSAM (2002Ke02) and 3.60 ps {I35} from RDDS (2013Ce01). Others: 3.3 ps {I3} deduced from B(E2) (1962St02), 2.2 ps {I2} deduced from B(E2) (1998Si25), and 3.3 ps {I6} deduced from B(E2) (2002So03). 
BE2$other: 0.160 {I28} (2002So03), 0.235 {I25} (1998Si25). 
G$from transient field technique (2009Mu06), same result obtained in reanalysis of data in 2010Mo14. 
G$Others: +0.38 {I4} from transient field technique (2002Ke02), 0.41 {I10} from transient field technique (1979BrZP), 0.30 {I8} from transient field technique (1977HaZW) and 0.30 {I7} from IMPAC (1979Fa06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G$from transient field technique (2009Mu06). Other: +0.42 {I19} (2010Mo14, reanalysis of transient field data) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from RDDS in 2013Ce01. Other: 1.32 ps {I14} from DSAM (2009Mu06). 
T$result from RDDS method is adopted here since 1) the DSAM results of 2009Mu06 cites difficulties in integrating the total 902|g peak shape due to a degeneracy with the 902|g from the 3- state and 2) the RDDS method is consistent with the result from {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g). 
G$from transient field technique (2009Mu06). Other: +0.21 {I13} (2010Mo14, reanalysis of transient field data) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=0.339 
B2$0.20 (1993Mo15), 0.229 (1968Le23), 0.240 {I17} (1987Ja05) 
J$analyzing power consistent with J|p=2+ (1993Mo15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=0.430 
B3$0.20 (1993Mo15), 0.216 (1968Le23), 0.210 {I15} (1987Ja05) 
J$analyzing power consistent with 3- (1993Mo15) 
E$other: 2870 {I20} (1967Ca15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
MOME2$extracted using anharmonic-vibrator model and is model dependent; a model-independent method using energy-weighted sum rule gives -0.235 {I27} (1981Ko06); another anharmonic-vibrator model analysis gives -0.21 {I3} (1972Li12) 
$|b{-2}R=1.23 {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=1432 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I124} from values of 1419 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I120} by DWEIKO and 1447 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I127} by ECIS (2021Ca22). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=53 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I7} from values of 62 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I7} by DWEIKO and 55 {Ie{+2}}fm{+4} {I6} by ECIS (2021Ca22). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$From 2016Eb03 with a 90 % C.L. The authors stated that switching to a prior uniform effective neutrino Majorana mass increased the limits on the T{-1/2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$Measured isotope shift (2019Xi07, collinear laser spectroscopy): |d|n({+68}Zn,{+71}Zn)=108.8 MHz {I24}(stat) {I44}(syst). 
$Measured change in radius (2019Xi07, collinear laser spectroscopy): |d<r{+2}>({+68}Zn,{+71}Zn)=0.227 fm{+2} {I7}(stat) {I23}(syst). 
MOMM1$hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). See also 2017Ne04 review article about Collinear laser spectroscopy measurements at ISOLDE-CERN. 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). Parity from L(d,p)=1 from 0+ target. Quasiparticle+phonon model calculations (2003Ho02) predict 1/2- g.s. Probable pure quasineutron state involving p{-1/2} orbital (2003Ho02) 
T$from |g decay curves. Weighted average of 2.36 min {I14} (2017Kr01) and 2.45 min {I10} (1961Th04). Others: 2.2 min (1962Ma24), 2.3 min (1958Le26), 2.2 min (1955Le03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Measured isotope shift (2019Xi07, collinear laser spectroscopy): |d|n({+68}Zn,{+71}Zn)=96.3 MHz {I11}(stat) {I43}(syst). 
$Measured change in radius (2019Xi07, collinear laser spectroscopy): |d<r{+2}>({+68}Zn,{+71}Zn)=0.191 fm{+2} {I3}(stat) {I23}(syst). 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). Other: (-)1.052 {I6} (NMR on oriented nuclei, 1989He05, authors' value of 1.035 {I18} revised by 1992Be51 based on their measurement of magnetic moment of {+65}Zn and improved determination of Zn hyperfine field in Fe; negative sign proposed by 1989He05 from theoretical magnetic moment). See also 2017Ne04 review article about Collinear laser spectroscopy measurements at ISOLDE-CERN. 
E$from {+70}Zn(n,|g) data in 2015BaZY, but details of this work are not available. 
J$spin from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). Parity from L(d,p)=4 from 0+ target. Quasiparticle+phonon model calculations (2003Ho02) predict 9/2+ as the first excited state, with probable pure quasineutron configuration=1g{-9/2}{+3} (2003Ho02,1989He05) 
T$from |g decay curves. Unweighted average of 4.155 h {I4} (2017Kr01) and 4.125 h {I7} (2012Re05). Others: 1967Vi08; 4.1 h {I1} (1964So01); 4.0 h {I1} (1961Th04); 4.1 h {I1} (1959La04); 3.92 h {I5} (1958Le26, |b{+-} counting using a Geiger counter, this value seems discrepant). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2; |g to 9/2+; probable pure d{-5/2} neutron state (2003Ho02) 
T$from |g|g(t) in (n,|g) (2015BaZY, details of this work are not available) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=1. 3/2- preferred by 2015Ce03 from comparison of experimental B(M1)(W.u.) and shell model calculations, but authors cautioned that this argument could not be used to assign J|p of this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_comment:
S$other: 0.67 (1967Vo05), 0.90 (1968Gr18) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=3.8 mb/sr (1967Vo05), d|s/d|W=2.6 mb/sr (1968Gr18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$3/2- preferred (2015Ce03) from comparison of experimental B(M1)(W.u.) and shell model calculations, but authors caution that this argument cannot be used to assign J|p of this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Beta feeding to this level was not reported by 2006Th12 and it was taken to be negligible on the assumption that the spin of {+72}Cu is equal to 2. In1983RU06, the g.s. feeding was reported as equal to 21% from the comparison between singles and gamma-gated beta intensities. Simply because the experimental conditions in 2006Th12 were considerable better than in 1983Ru06, we are adopting the results of the former reference. However, it should be pointed out that the g.s. |b- intensity remains uncertain. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=18.5 ps {I20}, average (by compiler) from |t=18 ps {I2} for unshifted peak, and 19 ps {I2} by conventional method (2017Do13). This value can be compared to mean lifetime |t=20 ps {I3} in {+72}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (May 2009 update); 19.79 ps {I25} (2012Fi02: Phys. Rev. C 85, 034334, from B(E2) in Coul. ex.); 17.9 ps {I17} (2012Ni09: Phys. Rev. C 85, 054321, RDDS method); 17.6 ps {I15} (2013Lo04, RDDS method) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=4.9 ps {I5}, average (by compiler) from |t=4.8 ps {I6} for unshifted peak, and 4.9 ps {I5} by conventional method (2017Do13). This value can be compared to mean lifetime |t=5.2 ps {I+8-7} (2013Lo04, RDDS method) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=3.5 ps {I4}, average (by compiler) from |t=3.3 ps {I6} for unshifted peak, and 3.6 ps {I4} by conventional method (2017Do13). This value can be compared to mean lifetime |t=3.0 ps {I9} (2013Lo04, RDDS method) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Deduced quadrupole invariants: <Q{+2}>=0.185 e{+2}b{+2} {I18}, (cos3|g)=0.34 {I10} (2023He06), giving deformation parameters: |b=0.241 {I12} and |g=23.3|' {I21}, close to maximum triaxiality. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Spectroscopic quadrupole moment Q=-0.24 {I3}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2023He06) from rigid rotor formalism. Authors point out that if the {+72}Zn nucleus can not be described by a rigid axial deformation, then magnitude of spectroscopic quadrupole moment Q=0.384 {I19}, larger than that from the Coulomb-excitation measurement indicating role of triaxiality in {+72}Zn. 
$E2 M.E. (g.s., 0+ to 652.7, 2+)=+0.424 {I2}(stat) {I21}(syst) (2023He06) 
$Diagonal M.E. (652.7, 2+ to 652.7, 2+)=-0.31 {I4}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2023He06) 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|_=0.0360 {I36}. This value can be compared to earlier measurements: 12.8 ps {I14} (2017Do13, RDDS method); 12.2 ps {I10} (2013Lo04, RDDS method); 12.4 ps {I12} (2012Ni09, RDDS method); 13.72 ps {I17} (2002Le17, Coul. ex.). 2017Do13: Eur. Phys. Jour. A53, 211; 2013Lo04: Phys. Rev. C 87, 054302; 2012Ni09: Phys. Rev. C 85, 054321; 2002Le17: Eur. Phys. Jour. A14, 1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Spectroscopic quadrupole moment Q=-0.27 {I+5-7}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2023He06) 
$E2 M.E. (652.7, 2+ to 1499.5, 4+)=+0.68 {I1}(stat) {I3}(syst) (2023He06) 
$Diagonal M.E. (1499.5, 4+ to 1499.5, 4+)=-0.36 {I+6-10}(stat) {I2}(syst) (2023He06) 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|_=0.0514 {I53}. This value can be compared to earlier measurements: 3.40 ps {I35} (2017Do13, RDDS method); 3.6 ps {I+6-5} (2013Lo04, RDDS method). 2017Do13: Eur. Phys. Jour. A53, 211; 2013Lo04: Phys. Rev. C 87, 054302. 
$2023He06 note that longer half-life in RDDS measurements, implying lower value of B(E2) (or less collectivity) could be due to underestimated correction for side feedings in RDDS measurements. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 M.E. (652.7, 2+ to 1511.0, 0+)=+0.14 {I+1-3}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2023He06) 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|_=0.0196 {I+39-76} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Spectroscopic quadrupole moment Q=+0.39 {I+4-3}(stat) {I2}(syst) (2023He06) 
$E2 M.E. (g.s., 0+ to 1657.3, 2+)=+0.074 {I+5-4}(stat) {I4}(syst) (2023He06) 
$E2 M.E. (652.7, 2+ to 1657.3, 2+)=+0.32 {I1}(stat) {I2}(syst) (2023He06) 
$M1 M.E. (652.7, 2+ to 1657.3, 2+)=-0.060 {I+70-30}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2023He06) 
$Diagonal M.E. (1657.3, 2+ to 1657.3, 2+)=+0.52 {I+5-3}(stat) {I3}(syst) (2023He06) 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|_(1657.6|g)=0.00110 {I+18-16} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
$Level included in the analysis of matrix elements, although, not observed in the present experiment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). See also 2017Ne04 review article 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 
T$weighted average of values extracted from decay curves of 217.4|g, 495.6|g and 910.6|g (2017Ve05). Other: 23.5 s {I10} from |b-decay curve in 1972Er05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). See also 2017Ne04 review article 
J$5/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01). J=5/2 is further confirmed by 2018Ya11 in the analysis of the ratio of the magnetic HFS constants for atomic states, in comparisons with those of neighboring Zn isotopes. 
T$from |g(t) in {+73}Cu |b{+-} decay (1998Hu20). Others: 13.1 ms {I18} (2017Ve05), |?10 ms (2018Ya11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$ weighted average of 95 s {I1} (1974Gr29) and 98 s {I2} (1972Er05). Both values are from gross |b spectrum from {+74}Zn |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 18.7 ps {I17} (2012Ni09,RDDS in {+2}H({+74}Zn,{+74}Zn'|g)); 19.8 ps {I25} (2013Lo04, RDDS in {+238}U({+76}Ge,{+74}Zn|g)); 17.0 ps {I13} (from B(E2)|^=0.204 {I15} in 2006Pe13 from Coul. ex.); 17.2 ps {I14} (from B(E2)|^=0.201 {I16} in 2007Va20 from Coul. ex.) 
J$level is Coulomb excited from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from RDDS in {+238}U({+76}Ge,{+74}Zn|g) (2013Lo04). Other: 3.1 ps {I4} from B(E2)|_=0.051 {I7} in Coul. ex. (2009Va01). Values of B(E2)|_=0.051 {I7} from Coul. ex. (2009Va01) and B(E2)|_=0.0116 {I+32-10} deduced from RDDS lifetime measurement in ({+76}Ge,{+74}Zn|g) reaction (2013Lo04) differ by a factor of 4.4. This disagreement is discussed in detail by 2013Lo04, concluding that additional measurements are needed to resolve the discrepancy. The evaluator has adopted here the higher lifetime from RDDS, based on a comparable B(E2)(W.u.) for the first 2+ state in {+74}Zn 
J$level is Coulomb excited via 2+ state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E,J$from Adopted Levels 
T$from 2009Va01, deduced from B(E2)|_ 
BE2$in 2006Pe13, value is relative to B(E2)|^=0.268 {I8} for the first 2+ state of {+76}Ge 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by evaluator from B(E2)|_=0.051 {I7} (2009Va01) 
$B(E2)|^=0.092 {I13} (deduced from B(E2)|_ in 2009Va01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$DWBA fit for J|p=0+ not good. 1984Be10 suggest that coupled channel effects are large, which may account for the discrepancy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$DWBA fit for expected L=2 not good. 1984Be10 suggest that coupled channel effects are probably large which may account for the poor fit. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J$spin from (1493|g)(606|g)(|q) (2023Ro02); possible spin of 1 rejected on the basis of 681|g to 4+, and possible spin of 4 rejected from unreasonable M3 admixture implied from |g|g(|q) and consequently large and unacceptable B(M3) value for 1493|g to 2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
E$ proposed as a |b-decaying isomer in {+75}Zn (2011Il01). Estimated half-life from systematics=5 s (2012Au07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
E$ proposed as a |b-decaying isomer in {+75}Zn (2011Il01) 
$ A total of 151.9 {I4} (or 29 {I6} absolute units) of relative intensity units are feeding this isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). 
J$7/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=SY;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01) 
T$from systematics (2017Au03: NUBASE-2016) 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+68}Zn,{+76}Zn)=+0.421 fm{+2} {I4}(stat) {I57}(syst) (2019Xi07) 
$|d|n({+68}Zn,{+76}Zn)=+221.3 MHz {I14}(stat) {I108}(syst) (2019Xi07) 
$Change in charge radius |d<r{+2}> and isotope shift |d|n measured by 2019Xi07 using collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. The Zn beams were produced from a thick UC{-x} target bombarded by a 1.4 GeV proton beam, and selectively ionized by the resonance ionization laser ion source (RILIS) 
T$from 1974Gr29 (integral |b(t)). Other values from the same laboratory: 4.9 s {I6} (1981Ru07); 5.4 s {I3} (1970OsZZ); 5.60 s {I6}, 5.1 s {I1}, 6 s {I1} (quoted by 1974Gr29). Other: 5.7 s (1981Gi17). Theoretical prediction: 1981Al25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$Coulomb excited state from 0+; systematics of even-even nuclei 
T$deduced from B(E2)|^=0.145 {I18} in Coulomb excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$level populated in Coul. ex. by two-step process; E(1296)/E(599)=2.16 is consistent with 4+ for this state 
T$deduced by evaluators from B(E2)|^=0.059 {I+15-11} in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$2022Si25 in {+76}Cu |b{+-} decay propose this level as possibly the 6+ yrast state seen in a high-spin experiment (Ref[38] in 2022Si25; unpublished) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$2021Ch56 in {+76}Cu |b{+-} decay state that this state may be high-spin negative-parity state formed by the occupation of the |n0g{-9/2} orbital; 2022Si25 propose 4- based on comparion of calculated |b feeding with their observed |b{+-} feeding. 
T$from distribution of time difference between the first and the second |g ray (|g|g(t)) fitted with an exponential decay plus a constant background (2021Ch56) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$proposed by 2022Si25 in {+76}Cu |b{+-} decay, based on measured |g intensity splitting with theoretical predictions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$2022Si25 in {+76}Cu |b{+-} decay proposed (3-) based on comparion of calculated |b feeding with their observed |b feeding 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)
level_comment:
J$3016.8|g to 0+; 2+ is disfavored by a predicted weak transition to g.s. relative to that of 2418|g if 2+, as compared to the observed relatively strong transition to g.s. (2022Si25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$2022Si25 propose this level as possibly the 6+ yrast state seen in a high-spin experiment (Ref[38] in 2022Si25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$2021Ch56 state that this state may be high-spin negative-parity state formed by the occupation of the |n0g{-9/2} orbital; 2022Si25 proposed (4-) based on comparion of calculated |b feeding with their observed |b feeding 
T$from distribution of time difference between the first and the second |g ray (|g|g(t)) fitted with an exponential decay plus a constant background (2021Ch56). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$2022Si25 proposed (3-) based on comparion of calculated |b feeding with their observed |b feeding 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)
level_comment:
J$2+ is disfavored by a predicted weak transition to g.s. relative to that of 2418|g if 2+, as compared to the observed relatively strong transition to g.s. (2022Si25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by evaluators from B(E2)|^ 
BE2$deduced from B(E2)|_=0.033 {I+8-6} (see comments for 698|g), average of values from 2009Va01 and 2023Il02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+68}Zn,{+77}Zn)=+0.440 fm{+2} {I5}(stat) {I64}(syst) (2019Xi07, laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN) 
$Measured isotope shift |d|n({+68}Zn,{+77}Zn)=236.0 MHz {I16}(stat) {I120}(syst) (2019Xi07, laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN) 
T$from 1986Ek01. Others: 2.20 s {I18} (1981Ru07), 1.4 s {I3} (1970OsZZ) 
J$three quasi particles (neutrons) arising from g{-9/2} orbital coupled to 7/2+ assumed from shell model and systematics. The g.s. feeds a suggested J|p=9/2+ state in {+77}Ga (2009Pa35,2009Il01) 
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01); measured |m=-0.9074 {I1} is re-evaluated to |m=-0.9067 {I1} by 2019StZV 
J$7/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Others: %|b{+-}>52 (2009Pa35), %IT>50 (1986Ek01) 
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+68}Zn,{+77}Zn)=+0.455 fm{+2} {I11}(stat) {I64}(syst) (2019Xi07, laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN) 
$Measured isotope shift |d|n({+68}Zn,{+77}Zn)=241.2 MHz {I38}(stat) {I120}(syst) (2019Xi07, laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN) 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Parity from agreement of measured |m with theoretical values (2017Wr01). Probable |np{-1/2} orbital (2009Pa35,2009Il01) 
T$from 772.43|g(t) (1986Ek01) 
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,3/2+)
level_comment:
J$5/2- proposed by 2009Pa35, 3/2+ by 2009Il01 and 2009Wi03, based on syst and shell-model predictions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Total feeding of this isomer is 31.4% {I33}, out of which 10.8% {I3} proceeds via IT decay and 20.6% {I33} via |b- decay (2009Il01) 
$Probable |np{-1/2} orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$level introduced by compiler to account for population of neutron-unbound levels, as suggested by %|b{+-}n values measured by 2010Ho10 and 2014XuZZ. 2009Pa35 estimate log {Ift}=4.1 for level decaying by neutrons to first 2+ level in {+76}Zn and 4.4 for level decaying to first 4+ level in {+76}Zn, but the feeding pattern of {+76}Zn levels could be more complex x<5368.9 {I34} from Q(|b{+-})-S(n)({+77}Zn), where Q(|b{+-})=9926.4 {I23} and S(n)=4557.5 {I25} (2017Wa10 and mass measurement by 2017We16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from {+78}Zn |b{+-} decay using |g spectrum multiscaling (1980Wo08). Other: 1.5 s {I6} (1981Ru07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n is unweighted average of 2.2 {I14} (2010Ho12 from 2109 implants and 19 correlated |bn coincidence events), and 1.3 {I4} (1991Kr15). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=1.66 s, %|b{+-}n=0.34 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=7.2 s, %|b{+-}n=2.0 (2016Ma12) 
J$9/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN, parity from excellent agreement of measured magnetic moment with large-scale shell-model predictions for |ng{-9/2}{+-1} configuration (2016Ya02) 
T$from 2010Ho12; measurement of time sequence of decay type neutron and |b events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+79}Zn) in Si detectors using method of maximum likelihood analysis which required, as input parameters, values of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all the nuclei involved. Others: 0.995 s {I19} (from decay curve of neutrons,1991Kr15), 1.0 s {I1} (1986Ek01), 2.63 s {I9} (1976Ru01), 3.00 s 9 (1974Gr29). In the measurements of 1976Ru01, 1974Gr29 and 1977Al17 the source was probably a mixture of {+79}Zn and {+79}Ga, 1991Kr15 report a more precise but much longer half-life than in 2010Ho12. Value from 2010Ho12 is preferred here due to better selectivity of the decay events and implants belonging to {+79}Zn activity. 2010Ho12 attribute the difference to the existence of a possible isomer in {+79}Zn whose contribution will depend on the reaction used to produce the source. Weighted average of the two widely results is not meaningful. The unweighted average of the two values is 0.87 s {I12}. 
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2016Ya02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Measured isomer shift |d|n({+79}Zn,{+79m}Zn)=61.3 MHz {I31} (2016Ya02) which gives difference in charge radii i.e. <r{+2}>({+79}Zn),{+79m}Zn)= +0.204 fm{+2} {I6}(stat) {I36}(syst) (2016Ya02) 
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2016Ya02) 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Large negative value of magnetic moment is consistent only with contribution from |n(3s{-1/2}{+1}1g{-9/2}{+-2}) with some mixing of |n2d{-3/2}{+1} orbital, giving a positive parity for the 1/2 isomer (2016Ya02). Also L(d,p)=(0) gives (1/2+) 
T$estimated by 2016Ya02 from no significant change observed in the intensity ratio of the most intense peaks in the hyperfine spectra for the ground state and isomer with different accumulation times. Authors also mention in the text half-life of a few hundred ms, as for the ground state 
$Proposed configuration=|n(3s{-1/2}1g{-9/2}{+-2}) with some mixing of |n(1g{-9/2}{+-2}2d{-3/2}{+1}) configuration, a 2h-1p intruder configuration (2016Ya02). Authors note that muti-particle-multi-hole such as 4h-3p configurations cannot be excluded as these can also give a magnetic moment in agreement with the experimental value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2 from angular distribution of 983|g-gated proton spectrum; also L(d,p)=0+2 (41% {I3} L=0 and 51% {I4} L=2 component) for 850-1550-keV region proton spectrum and comparison with DWBA calculations; also shell-model predictions; |g to 9/2+ rules out 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
E$from proton spectrum, expected to be an isomer from systematics; half-life and decay modes are not known 
J$L(d,p)=0+2 for 850-1550 keV region proton spectrum and comparison with DWBA calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2+)
level_comment:
E$1.34 MeV {I15} from proton spectrum 
J$prompt 236|g to (1/2+) is M1 or E1; feeding from higher states favors positive parity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2 from angular distribution of 441|g-gated proton spectrum; also L(d,p)=0+2 for 850-1550 keV region proton spectrum and comparison with DWBA calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$9/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN, parity from excellent agreement of measured magnetic moment with large-scale shell-model predictions for |ng{-9/2}{+-1} configuration (2016Ya02). 
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2016Ya02). 
T$from {+79}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (May 2016 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2016Ya02) 
$Measured isomer shift |d|n({+79}Zn,{+79m}Zn)=61.3 MHz {I31} (2016Ya02) which gives difference in charge radii i.e. <r{+2}>({+79}Zn,{+79m}Zn)= +0.204 fm{+2} {I6}(stat) {I36}(syst) (2016Ya02) 
E$from 2015Or01 (Phys. Lett. B 740, 298); also in {+79}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database. 
T$estimated by 2016Ya02 from no significant change observed in the intensity ratio of the most intense peaks in the hyperfine spectra for the ground state and isomer with different accumulation times. Authors also mention in the text half-life of a few hundred ms, as for the ground state. 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Large negative value of magnetic moment is consistent only with contribution from |n(3s{-1/2}{+1}1g{-9/2}{+-2}) with some mixing of |n2d{-3/2}{+1} orbital, giving a positive parity for the 1/2 isomer (2016Ya02). 
$Proposed configuration=|n(3s{-1/2}1g{-9/2}{+-2}) with some mixing of |n(1g{-9/2}{+-2}2d{-3/2}{+1}) configuration, a 2h-1p intruder configuration (2016Ya02). Authors note that muti-particle-multi-hole such as 4h-3p configurations cannot be excluded as these can also give a magnetic moment in agreement with the experimental value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$9/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN, parity from excellent agreement of measured magnetic moment with large-scale shell-model predictions for |ng{-9/2}{+-1} configuration (2016Ya02: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 182502). 
MOMM1,MOME2$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01). 
T$from {+79}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (May 2016 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1$from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN (2017Wr01) 
E$from 2015Or01 (Phys. Lett. B740, 298); also in {+79}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, and in 2017Au03 (NUBASE-2016) 
T$estimated by 2016Ya02 from no significant change observed in the intensity ratio of the most intense peaks in the hyperfine spectra for the ground state and isomer with different accumulation times. Authors also mention in the text half-life of a few hundred ms, as for the ground state. 
J$1/2 from measurement of hyperfine structure by collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE-CERN. Large negative value of magnetic moment is consistent only with contribution from |n(3s{-1/2}{+1}1g{-9/2}{+-2}) with some mixing of |n2d{-3/2}{+1} orbital, giving a positive parity for the 1/2 isomer (2016Ya02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E$from tof-ICR measurement using JYFLTRAP. Other: 943 {I14} from |d-tof-ms measurement using ISOLTRAP (2023Ni10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n: other: <1.8 (2010Ho12) 
T$weighted average of 562.2 ms {I30} (2014Xu07), 578 ms {I21} (2010Ho12), 0.54 s {I3} (1991Kr15), 0.55 s {I2} (1986Gi07) and 0.53 s {I5} (1986Ek01). Half-life in 2014Xu07 from |b|g-coin decay curve. Half-life in 2010Ho12 from measurement of time sequence of decay type events correlated with the implanted nuclei (of {+80}Zn) in Si detectors using method of maximum likelihood analysis with input parameters of |b-detection efficiency, background, half-lives of daughter and granddaughter nuclei and experimental or theoretical values of %|b{+-}n of all nuclei involved 
$In 2010Ho12, a total of 5043 implants were detected, and 45 correlated |bn coincidences were observed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.073 {I15} (2007Va20,previous result from the same group as 2009Va01) 
T$from systematics of even-even nuclei, level is Coulomb excited from 0+ 
T$from 2009Va01, deduced from B(E2)(|_) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.073 {I15} (2007Va20,previous result from the same group as 2009Va01) 
T$from 2009Va01, deduced from B(E2)(|_)=0.0144 {I29} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$2016Sh07 list uncertainty of 30 keV 
T$estimated value from line-shape analysis using the |h{+2} minimization procedure with GEANT4 simulated response function for the 1497, 2+ to 0+ transition (2016Sh07), the systematic uncertainty from the energy determination is included. Half-life of 0.52 ps {I11} of the 1497, (2+) level deduced from B(E2)(|_)=0.0144 {I29} (2009Va01: Phys. Rev. C79, 014309) is too short to significantly affect the line shape for the 482-keV transition. According to e-mail reply from Y. Shiga on March 3, 2016, listed value in the paper is the half-life. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J 5/2+ suggested in 2007VeZZ; possible configuration: (|n 2d{-5/2}). Based on the latest level scheme, |b decay feeding the {+81}Ga g.s. is negligible and 1/2+ can't be ruled out, authors noted in 2020Pa26. 
T weighted average of 290 ms {I50} (1991Kr15), 391 ms {I65} (2007Ve08, from 351|g({+81}Ga)(t)), 303.2 ms {I26} |b|g-coin decay curve (2014Xu07), 304 ms {I13} (2010Pa33), 290 ms {I4} (2020Pa26 - their preliminary value 297 ms {I4} 2013PaZU), and 474 ms {I+93-83} (2010Ho12). 
%|b{+-}n from 2020Pa26 [based on the measurements of {+81}Zn decay chain using %|b{+-}n({+81}Ga)=11.9 % {I7} (2008Ba34), %|b{+-}n({+81}Ga)=11.8 % {I8} in this evaluation]. Other %|b{+-}n: 10 {I3} (2010Pa33 - considering the 20% |b branch unaccounted by authors, otherwise 12 {I4} in 2010Pa33, also 2009Gr06), 30 {I13} (2010Ho12), and 7.5 {I30} (1991Kr15), 2005KoZU estimate %|b{+-}n({+81}Zn)>10 from {+80}Ga in {+81}Zn decay spectrum. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Possible configuration: |pf{-5/2}{+2}(0+)~#|nd{-5/2} (2017Sh42), suggesting 5/2+ for the ground state, as has been proposed earlier also 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n: value obtained by 2016Al10 from |b|g study of {+82}Zn to {+81}Ga by |b{+-}n decay and {+81}Ga |b{+-} decay to {+81}Ge, using literature value of absolute intensity for an 828-keV |g ray from |b{+-} decay of {+81}Ga. See more details in 2016Al10 
$ Theoretical values of %|b{+-}n: |?90 (2005Bo19). 41 (1997Mo25), 17 from KHF systematics, 35 and 100 from two QRPA models (2002Pf04). Theoretical %|b{+-}2n=0 (1997Mo25) 
$Production cross section=13 nb (1997Be70) in {+238}U on Be, E=750 MeV/a 
T$average of 155 ms {I26} (2016Al10), from gate on 351-keV |g ray from |b{+-}n decay of {+82}Zn to {+81}Ga, by fitting the growth and decay curve with Bateman equations and 177.9 ms {I25} (2014Xu07) from |b|g-coin decay curve. 2016Al10 give T{-1/2} uncertainties as 17 ms statistical and 20 ms systematics which have been added in quadrature. Other: 228 ms {I10} (2012Ma37), Theoretical calculations of |b decay half-life: 0.6 s (2005Bo19), 22.2 ms (1997Mo25), 52 ms from KHF systematics, 211 ms or 734 ms from two QRPA models (2002Pf04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$tentative level assignment, based on Ni78-II and A3DA-m shell-model calculations (2017Sh42) 
$Configuration=(|pp{-3/2}){+2}(0+) (2017Sh42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$tentative level assignment, based on Ni78-II and A3DA-m shell-model calculations (2017Sh42) 
$Configuration=(|pp{-3/2}{+2}){-0+} (2017Sh42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n=90 (calculated, 2005Bo19), 40 (systematics, 2012Mc04). 
J$5/2+ from systematics (2012Au07). 
T$from 2012Ma37 derived from growth and decay curve of 109.6-keV |g-ray. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2016Al10 from grow-in and decay curve for |b-gated 109|g transition. This value can be compared with 117 ms {I20} from 2012Ma37 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 112501), a previous measurement, also by the same experimental group as 2016Al10 
J$5/2+ given in Fig. 10 of 2016Al10, probably from systematics 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Half-life of the ground state is 117 ms {I20} as given in {+83}Zn Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Dec 2014 update) 
$Possible configuration=|pf{-5/2}{+2}{-0+}~#|nd{-5/2}{+3}, predicting 5/2+ from A3DA-m model space or 3/2+ from PFSDG-U calculations (2017Sh42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n from |b{+-}, |g data for {+84}Zn |) {+83}Ga |) {+82}Ge |b{+-}n decay chain (2014XuZZ) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=42.7 ms, %|b{+-}n=50, %|b{+-}2n=1, %|b{+-}3n=0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=44.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=31.5, 30.7; %|b{+-}2n=0.52, 0.68; %|b{+-}3n=0, 0.003 (2021Mi17, two values for different fission barriers). 
T$from 2014XuZZ, from (108.5|g)|b-coin data. Other: 65.0 ms {I60}, from analysis of implant-|b correlated decay curve with theoretical %|b{+-}n values for {+84}Zn decay, half-lives and %|b{+-}n values daughter and grand-daughter decays. Evaluators prefer value from |b|g-coin data, although, 108.5|g from {+84}Zn to {+84}Ga remains to be confirmed. Weighted average of the two values is 61 ms {I6}. 
$Measured |s=43 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?50% 
$Configuration=(|pf{-5/2}){+2}(0+) (2017Sh42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$observed fragments are assumed to correspond to the g.s. Since only one event was assigned by 2010Oh02 to this nuclide, evaluators consider the isotopic identification as tentative until further confirmation by better statistics 
$Measured |s=2 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty |?50% 
J$5/2+ suggested from systematics (2012Au07), 3/2+ in theoretical predictions of 1997Mo25 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight in 2010Oh02, as communicated to the evaluators by T. Kubo in an e-mail reply of July 14, 2010. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the systematics value of 50 ms (2012Au07) and theoretical value of 23 ms (1997Mo25). 
$Misidentification of {+85}Zn isotope is not possible since no events were observed for hydrogen-like peaks (2010Oh02) 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=32.3, %|b{+-}2n=7.4 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
%B-$decay mode not observed, however, inferred by compiler as only energetically allowed decay mode. 
$11 counts assigned to {+86}Zn by 2024Sh17, which are assumed by the compiler to correspond to the g.s. activity of {+86}Zn 
$Measured production |s=1.7|*10{+2} fb (2024Sh17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Proton decay is expected to be the primary mode since S(p)=-1250 {I180} (2017Wa10) 
J$3/2- proposed from systematic trend (2017Au03); 1/2- neutron orbital in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$from experimental search for {+59}Ga combined with expected number of transmitted nuclei based on abrasion-ablation model cross sections and the time of flight of 370 ns for {+59}Ga. Assuming a systematic uncertainty of one order of magnitude in calculated cross section, estimated T{-1/2}=43 ns {I+28-12}. Theoretical T{-1/2} for |b decay=42 ms (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1 
$J|p and |ep decay mode from {+60}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (Dec 2012 update) 
T$measured by 2017Ku12 from ({+60}Ga implants)|b correlated decay curve. Others: 70 ms {I13} in 2002Lo13 (Phys. Rev. C66, 025803); 70 ms {I15} in 2001Ma96 (Eur. Phys. J. A12, 269). Value of 70 ms {I13} from 2002Lo13 is listed in {+60}Ga Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 
$Total number of {+60}Ga implanted ions=4.96|*10{+4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$B(F)=3.1 {I1} 
$E(p)(c.m.)=2522 {I15} to g.s. in {+59}Zn, %I(p)=33 {I1} 
$E(p)(c.m.)=2067 {I15} to 463 level in {+59}Zn, %I(p)=10.2 {I5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.3 to 1/2-, and 5.6 to 5/2- levels in {+61}Zn from {+61}Ga |e decay 
T$weighted average of 162 ms {I10} (timing of |b(implant) correlations, 2014Ro14); 168 ms {I3} (timing of |b or |b-delayed proton events correlated with implanted {+61}Ga nuclei,2002We07); 148 ms {I19} (2002Lo13,2002Bl17) and 0.15 s {I3} (1993Wi18,1993Wi03). Other: 167.3 ms {I29} (2008Se10 evaluation) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
E$from E(p)(c.m.)=3170 {I30} (2007Bl09) (weighted average of E(p)(c.m.)=3162 {I30} (from (E(p)lab)=3110 {I30} (1987Ho01))) and E(p)(c.m.)=3220 {I60} (2007Bl09)) and S(p)({+61}Ga)=250 {I40} (2012Wa38). 
$E-mail reply on Aug 24, 2009 from B. Blank confirmed that E(p)=3220 {I60} is their c.m. value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1/2 
$J|p and |ep decay mode from {+61}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (Jan 2015 update). 
T$measured by 2017Ku12 from ({+61}Ga implants)|b correlated decay curve. Others: 162 ms {I10} in 2014Ro14 (Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 41; from GANIL); 148 ms {I19} in 2002Lo13 (Phys. Rev. C66, 025803; from GANIL); 150 ms {I30} in 1993Wi03 (Phys. Lett. 299B, 214). Value of 167 ms {I3} is listed in {+61}Ga Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Jan 2015 update) 
$Total number of {+61}Ga implanted ions=1.35|*10{+5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Decay modes and J|p from {+61}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 
$T{-z}=-1/2 
T$measured by 2014Ro14 from |b{++} decay correlation time spectrum 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=3.4877 {I2} to 0+, superallowed |b decay, 
T$ weighted average of 116.100 ms {I25} (2008Gr03, earlier value from the same group: 116.01 ms {I19} (2005Hy04)), 116.09 ms {I17} (2005Ca06), 116.19 ms {I4} (2004Bl03), 115.84 ms {I25} (2003Hy02), 114 ms {I2} (2002Bl17,2002Lo13), 116.34 ms {I35} (1979Da04), 115.95 ms {I30} (1978Al23), 116.4 ms {I15} (1978Ch11); with reduced |h{+2}=0.90. Others: 113 ms {I+6-5} or 110 ms {I+6-5} (1993Wi03,1993Wi18), 120.8 ms {I20} (1976BaXP), 115 ms {I10} (1976JaZP). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ from |g|g(t). Weighted average of 4.0 ns {I+21-15} (2004Ru03) and 3.2 ns {I11} (1998Vi06) 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 1(+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$B(GT)<0.054 {I+13-19} (2014Gr10) 
E,J$in 2013Da16 (Phys. Lett. B 726, 665), and 2004Ru03 (Phys. Rev. C 69, 034309), a level at 1017.7,2+ decaying by a 445.9|g to 571.8 level was proposed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Decay modes and J|p from {+62}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 
$T{-z}=0 
T$measured by 2014Ro14 from |b{++} decay correlation time spectrum 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E,J$from 2015He22. The authors suggest that the observed 977|g is a strong candidate for the decay of the T=1, J|p=2+ state based on systematics of T=1 triplet. Other: J|p=1+, T=0 in 2013Da16 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$981|g is strongest intensity transition, indicating decay of the T=1 level as it is the only one expected to be strongly populated in the inelastic scattering experiment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$spin=3/2 from fitting of hyperfine structure and agreement of measured quadrupole moment with shell-model calculations using jj44b and JUN45 interactions (2012Pr11) and parity=- from allowed |e+|b{++} feeding to 3/2- g.s. in {+63}Zn 
T$weighted average of 32.4 s {I5} (1971GiZS), 31.4 s {I8} (1970Du05), 33 s {I4} (1965Nu02). Other: 35 s {I1} (1964Fi01) is slightly discrepant. Weighted average of all gives 32.6 s {I7} with a reduced |h{+2}=2.7 
MOMM1,MOME2$extracted by 2012Pr11 from previous measurements of hyperfine coefficients by the same group as 2012Pr11 by collinear laser spectroscopy. Known |m and Q for {+71}Ga were used for calibration. The 3/2 is correct spin assignment, however 2012Pr11 list |m=+1.652 {I6}, Q=+0.424 {I25} for J=5/2 also and compare these with shell-model calculations. See also 2019StZV evaluation and 2021StZZ compilation. 
$2012Pr11 predict first three levels at 0, 3/2-; 118, 1/2- and 165, 5/2- using jj44b interaction. Using jun45 interaction, the first three levels are predicted at 0, 1/2-; 88, 3/2- and 237, 5/2-. But 1/2 spin for the ground state is not supported in the present experimental hyperfine structure 
$|d<r{+2}>({+71}Ga,{+63}Ga)=-0.643 fm{+2} {I15}(stat) {I135}(syst) (2012Pr11). 
$Isotope shift |d|n({+71}Ga,{+63}Ga)=+121 MHz {I6}(stat) {I18}(syst) (2012Pr11). 
$rms matter radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=3.91 fm {I26} (2004Li29). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$75.1|g M1+E2, |DJ=1 to 3/2-; 5/2- from systematics of neighboring odd-A Ga isotopes and shell-model predictions (1f{-5/2} single-particle orbit) (1991Ba20). 
$Shell-model calculations (2012Pr11) predict 1/2- with E(level)=118 using jj44b interaction and 3/2- at E(level)=88 using JUN45 interaction for the first excited state, and predict 5/2- for the second excited state using either interaction. In systematics of odd Ga isotopes in 1991Ba20, the 5/2- first excited state in {+63}Ga corresponds to the 5/2- second excited states in {+65,67,69}Ga isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$624.6|g D, |DJ=1 to 7/2(-); 9/2+ proposed by 1991Ba20 based on systematics of neighboring odd-A Ga isotopes and shell-mode predictions; band head 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$1304.6|g (Q), |DJ=(2) to (27/2) 
$Reversed ordering of the 1812-1305 |g cascade from 11974 level is possible, which can give level energy as 10670 keV instead of 10161 (2021Ru07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2)
level_comment:
E$2001We11 in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) report a doublet of 12831+12832 based on placements of 1921.9|g+1924.3|g doublet transitions and different ordering of |g cascades. Both the |g and level doublets are considered as a singlet by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g) as adopted here. See more detailed comments in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
J$1924.8|g Q, |DJ=2 to (33/2); band assignment. 2001We11 assigned J|p=39/2- to the 12832 component of the 12831+12832 doublet reported in ({+32}S,2|ap|g); J|p of 12831 component is not assigned but could be (37/2+) based on their band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Reversed ordering of the 1813-1304 |g cascade is possible, which can give level energy as 10670 keV instead of 10161 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E$The order of 1422.0|g-624.6|g from a 2047 level in 1991Ba20 is reversed in 2001We11, thus making a level at E=1422 instead, which is confirmed in a more detailed |g|g-coin measurement by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2)
level_comment:
E$From reversing of the order of 1772.8|g-649.1|g cascade from 6502 level in 1991Ba20 who originally propose an intermediate level at 4729 level. See comment at 1772.8|g from 5853 level. 
J$assigned by the evaluator based on 1772.8|g D, |DJ=1 to (17/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 35/2(-)
level_comment:
E$the order of 1868|g-1924|g from 12832 level is reversed in Adopted Levels, Gammas, making an intermediate level at 10908 instead 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$With the orders of 2497.4|g-1921.9|g cascade from this level and 1868.3|g-1924.3|g cascade from 12832 level being reversed in Adopted Levels, Gammas as adopted from 2021Ru07, the two close levels proposed by 2001We11 are considered as a single level at 10833 in Adopted Levels as adopted from 2021Ru07 and the doublet of 1921.9|g+1924.3|g for a peak structure at around 1922 reported in 2001We11 is considered as a single transition of 1924.8|g seen in 2021Ru07, also considering that it is unclear how the |g doublet is determined in 2001We11. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$%|e=98, %|b{++}=2 
$|d<r{+2}>({+71}Ga,{+64}Ga)=-0.579 fm{+2} {I18}(stat) {I119}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
$Isotope shift |d|n({+71}Ga,{+64}Ga)=+94 MHz {I7}(stat) {I15}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
$Measured matter r.m.s. radius=3.75 fm {I10} (2004Li29, from Si({+64}Ga,X),E=56.8 MeV/nucleon at GANIL, Glauber analysis); reduced strong absorption r{-0}=1.017 fm {I12}, with measured |s=2.51 b {I6} 
J$|b{++}|g circular polarization (1966De10,1967Ma04); L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+ target 
T$157.6 s {I7} from weighted average of 157.6 s {I7} (1990SuZR, probably from |g decay); 157.4 s {I7} (1973Da01, 992|g decay); 159 s {I2} (1972Mo08, 992|g decay); 2.7 min {I1} (1967Ko02, |g decay); 2.6 min {I1} (1953Cr15, |g-decay). Others: 2.6 min (1980Na15,1980NaZS, |g decay); 2.5 min (1953Co14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$(E2) |g to 0+ 
T$from pulsed-beam method in {+63}Cu({+3}He,2n) (1999Ta29). Other: >1 |ms (|g(t) in (p,n|g), 1974Ha42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
E$may be weakly populated in {+64}Ge |e decay 
T$from two-component analysis of 128|g(t) curve in (p,n|g) (1974Ha42), T{-1/2}|?3 ns or less 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$(2+,1+) from measured and calculated (Hauser-Feshbach) |s(|q) and |s(integral) in (p,n|g); |g from (4+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$population uncertain in {+64}Ge |e decay and in (p,n|g). The level suggested by the evaluator on the basis of 774.5|g seen in both these studies (but not placed) and a corresponding level at 818 reported in (p,n) and ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$value may be high, since the 1905 (from ({+3}He,t)) state was reported at 1950 in (p,n) 
J$|s(|q) and IAS of first 2+ state of {+64}Zn 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Suggested level population (evaluators) on the basis of an 818 level reported in (p,n|g) and ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
$No 42.9|g seen in prompt spectrum (I|g<3) (1974Ha42) 
T$|?3 ns or less; based on two-component analysis of 128|g(t) curve 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Level population suggested by the evaluator on the basis of an 818 group reported in (p,n) and ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$listed in 1974Ro16 as 0 {I4} 
J$from the Adopted Levels, also |s(|q) (1970Hi06) 
L$From 1970Hi06. Shape of |s(|q) resembles L=1 better than L=0 but 1970No05 show that this result is to be expected 
$Antianalog state (1970Hi06,1970No05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$1905.1 {I23} (1974Ro16), 2025 {I30} (1971Be29), 2050 (1970Hi06) 
$|s(g.s.)/|s(2050)=0.09 (1970Hi06) 
L$from |s(|q) (2019Di08,1970Hi06) 
J$|s(|q) and analog state of g.s. of {+64}Zn (2019Di08,1970Hi06) 
$Counts=16499 {I129} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$From Fig. 7a in 2019Di08, interpreted by authors as isospin T=3 analog state of 2660, 1+ level in {+64}Cu 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$from Fig. 7a in 2019Di08, interpreted by authors as isospin T=3 analog state of 3190, 1+ level in {+64}Cu 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T from measured I|b{++} (1957Da07). Evaluator's Note: this is the only published data with a quoted uncertainty. 
J$L=1 in (d,n),({+3}He,d); allowed |e to 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
E weighted average of 1083 {I15} ({+3}He,d) and 1085 {I10} ({+7}Li,{+6}He) 
J$L=4 in (d,n),({+3}He,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
E weighted average of 1851 {I15}, 1867 {I15}, and 1869 {I10} from (d,n), ({+3}He,d) and ({+7}Li,{+6}He) reactions, respectively 
J$L=1 in (d,n),({+3}He,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E anti-analog state of 1066 level in {+65}Zn (1979Ra12) 
J$L=4 in (d,n),({+3}He,d); DCO in (HI,xn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
I(|e+|b{++})=0 {I14} from the normalization used here; it is estimated to be <10% (1973Jo12). Other: <30% from measured growth of {+65}Ga daughter activity (1974Ro16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
E also seen by 1987Ni14 at 2208 
J: 5/2 consistent with |g|g(|q) data for a level at 2210 (1982Ra11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
E anti-analog state of the 1370 level in {+65}Zn (1982Ra11). 
J=3/2, 5/2 consistent with |g|g(|q) data for a level at 2820 (1982Ra11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E from 1974Ze01. Uncertainty not given but probably |?60 keV. Level not reported in 1967Be18, but a level is reported in {+64}Zn(d,n) at 1364 {I15}. 
L from DWBA analysis of |s(|q) (1974Ze01). 
C{+2}S' from 1974Ze01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$ Deduced from the measured A(5{Is}{+2}{IS}{-1/2},{+65}Ga)=+940.3 {I13} MHz in 2017Fa09 and A(5{Is}{+2}{IS}{-1/2},{+71}Ga)=+1358.2 {I16} MHz (2010Ch16), relative to |m({+71}Ga)=+2.56227 {I2} (2005St24) and J({+71}Ga)=3/2. 
MOME2$ Deduced from the measured B(4{Ip}{+2}{IP}{-3/2},{+65}Ga)=+75 {I1} MHz in 2017Fa09 and B(4{Ip}{+2}{IP}{-3/2},{+71}Ga)=+39 {I2} MHz (2010Ch16), relative to Q({+71}Ga)=+0.107 {I1} (2008Py02). 
J$Directly measured using the hyperfine structure analysis in 2017Fa09. |p from |m and the proposed mixed |pp{-3/2} and |pf{-5/2} configuration (2017Fa09). 
$Isotope shift |d|n=+101 {I5} MHz, measured relative to {+71}Ga. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J spin from atomic beam (1976Fu06); |p=+ from M1 from 1+ level. 
T weighted average of 9.57 h {I6} (1956Ru45), 9.5 h {I1} (1959Ca15), 9.33 h {I8} (1964Ru06), and 9.49 h {I3} (2006Ab30). Others: 9.45 h (1950La55) and 9.35 h (1967Va13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 1+,2+ from M1+E2 to 1+; not fed in |e decay from 0+ 
T weighted average of pulsed-beam delayed-|g coincidences: 23 ns {I2} from {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) and 23 ns {I2} from {+66}Zn(p,n|g). 
MOMM1 From time-dependent perturbed-angular distribution (TDPAD) of |g rays (1976Le03); does not include Knight shift correction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 1 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g), J=2 from H-F analysis in (p,n|g); |p=+ from M1 to 0+. 
T from delayed-|g|g coincidences in {+66}Ge |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E disagreement over the J|p assignment and the |g branchings from this level in {+66}Ge |e decay, (|a,n|g), (|a,np|g), and (p,n|g) suggest that there may be a level doublet at this energy. 
J there is some disagreement over the J|p assignment of this level. J=(3) from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) and (|a,np|g); J=3 from H-F analysis in (p,n|g). J=2 from |g(|q) of the 96|g doublet in (p,n|g). |p=+ from E2 to 1+ 
T$From pulsed-beam delayed-|g coincidences in (|a,np|g) (1978Mo21). Other value: 4.2 ns 2 (1997KoZW). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0,1)+
level_comment:
J=1,2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g), J=2 rejected by incompatible |d(182|g) values from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) and |a(K)exp in {+66}Ge |e decay; other: J=0,4 from H-F analysis in (p,n|g); |p=+ from M1 to 1+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) and |g-decay systematics in (|a,n|g), (|a,np|g), and H-F analysis in (p,n|g); |p=+ from M1 to 162.4-keV [(3)+] level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) and |g-decay systematics in (|a,n|g), (|a,np|g), and H-F analysis in (p,n|g); |p=+ from M1+E2 to 162.4-keV [(3)+] level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) of 601|g and excitation functions in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g), {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 
T from pulsed-beam delayed-|g coincidences in {+56}Fe({+13}C,2np|g), {+52}Cr({+16}O,np|g). Other value: 39 ns {I2} (1997KoZW). 
MOMM1 Other: +0.861 {I21} and +0.89 {I2} (1985Ra23) from time-dependent perturbed angular distribution (TDPAD) of |g rays. 
MOME2 From DPAD of |g rays (1985Ra23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)
level_comment:
J from 1268|g decay of J|p=(9) level at 3043, |g decay to J=(6) level at 1513, and observed weakness of population in the reactions {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) and {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J|p=9+ suggested in (|a,d) from strength of reaction |s, reaction systematics and shell model 
MOMM1 From integral perturbed angular correlation (IPAC) (1987Ba45). 
T value quoted by 1987Ba45 without giving any details. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T From (338|g)(43.8|g)(t) (1975Ro25) others, from delayed-|g|g coincidences: 12 ns {I1} (1969Ba31), 21 ns {I2} (1969Bo21), <12 ns (1970De39). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
g=0.129 {I7} (1978Fi03); Q=0.78 {I4} (1985Ra33) 
Other: +0.127 {I3} (1985Ra33) 
T from pulsed-beam delayed-|g coincidences (1978Fi03) 
g-factor: from |g(|q,H,t) (1978Fi03); from time differential perturbed angular distributions (TDPAD) (1985Ra33) 
Q: from TDPAD (1985Ra33) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$from Adopted Levels 
T value quoted by 1987Ba45 without giving any details. 
g-factor from perturbed angular distribution of an implanted source (1987Ba45) 
E given as 3034 by 1987Ba45; must be a misprint. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T nearly identical decay curves for the 43.9|g and 22.4|g measured after the beam pulse indicate T{-1/2}(43.9 level)<T{-1/2}(66.3 level) (1976Le03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 7 from |g(|q) of 601|g and excitation functions. 
T weighted mean of 52 ns {I8} (1978Mo21) and 63 ns {I7} (attributed incorrectly in 1976Le03 to an isomeric state at E(level)=1442.) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)
level_comment:
J (7) from |g decay from J|p=9+ at 3043, |g decay to J=6 at 1513 and observed weakness of population in the reactions {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) and {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J (11) favored by 1978Mo21 from comparison of level populations {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) and {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J (10) favored by 1978Mo21 from comparison of level populations in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) and {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13)
level_comment:
J (13) from 947|g(|q), calculated from |g(|q) of the 944|g+947|g doublet in {+64}Zn(|a,np|g) and |g(|q) of 944|g in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g), excitation functions, and comparison of level populations in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) and {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
E weighted average of 2970 {I30} (1994Fi01) and 2990 {I30} (1969Lu07) 
J from DWBA analysis (1994Fi01) and from strength of reaction |s, reaction systematics, and shell model (1969Lu07,1968Lu05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from (65.1|g)(43.9|g)(t) (1976Le03) T{-1/2}=17.3 ns {I20} from pulsed-beam delayed-43.9|g coincidence corrected for feeding from 66.3 level (assumed to have T{-1/2}=15.4 ns {I4}) (1974Di14). Others: uncorrected for feeding: 24.6 ns {I20} (1972He11), 23 ns {I2} (1976Le03) from pulsed-beam delayed-43.9|g. T{-1/2}=25 ns {I3} from (96.4|g)(43.9|g)(t) uncorrected for 96.4|g component feeding 66.3 level (1976Le03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from pulsed-beam delayed-22.4|g coincidence at E(p)=6.6 MeV. Other: pulsed-beam delayed-22.4|g coincidence measurement at E(p)=7.5-10 MeV, T{-1/2}=15.4 ns {I4} (1974Di14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J=1 from |g(|q) of 109|g (1971Na15); |p=+ most probable from compound nuclear-statistical model calculations. J=2 from H-F analysis (1994Ti02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
J 2 from |g(|q) (1971Na15); J=1 from H-F analysis of E(p)=6.7 data, J=2 from H-F analysis of E(p)=6.9, 7.1 MeV data (1994Ti02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
J antianalog state. L=0 transfer in this DWBA analysis does not give a good fit to the |s(|q) data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$ measured by 2010Se16, weighted average of four different results: 9.284 h {I20}, 9.299 h {I12}, 9.329 h {I12}, 9.289 h {I13} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+71}Ga,{+66}Ga)=-0.329 fm{+2} {I13}(stat) {I75}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
$Isotope shift |d|n({+71}Ga,{+66}Ga)=+94 MHz {I5}(stat) {I11}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
J$from {+66}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$level-energy taken from {+66}Ga Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database kept fixed with its uncertainty in the level-scheme fitting procedure 
$This level decays to g.s., 0+ through a 43.81|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$from TDPAD measurements (2020Gr05). 
J$from the agreement of the measured g-factor and the expected g-factor for the configuration |2|p{If}{-5/2}~#|n{Ig}{-9/2}|3{-7{+-}} (2020Gr05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$Unweighted average of 3.261 d {I1}(1972Le37),3.264 d {I4}(1978La21), 3.261 d {I1}(1978Me10),3.2594 d {I12}(1979De42),3.2607 d {I8}(1980Ho17), 3.26154 d {I54}(2002Un02) 3.2623 d {I15}(2004Sc04),3.2634 d {I16}(2004Da05). Others: 3.29 d {I8}(1938Ma01), 3.46 d(1948Ho04),3.26 d {I2}(1948Mc32), 3.33 d(1950Ho26),3.246 d {I13}(1955To27), 3.30 d {I7}(1964Ru06),3.27 d {I6}, 3.26 d {I5}, 3.53 d {I10}, 3.30 d {I6}, 2.90 d {I15}, 3.51 d {I5}, 3.78 d {I18}, 3.49 d {I18}(1972Cr02). 
J=3/2 from atomic beam data (1976Fu06); |p=- from L(p,t)=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from delayed coincidence data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g), {+53}Cr({+16}O,pn|g) 
J=1/2 from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(p,|g); |p=- from L(p,t)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J=5/2 from |g(|q) in {+67}Zn(p,n|g); |p=- from L(p,t)=2 
T weighted average of 0.17 ps {I5} from (|a,p|g) and 0.18 ps {I5} from (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$other: 0.07 ps {I+3-2} from {+67}Zn(p,n|g) 
J=3/2 from |g(|q) in {+67}Zn(p,n|g); |p=- from L(p,t)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2,7/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J=5/2 from |g(|q) in {+67}Zn(p,n|g); 7/2 from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g) 
T other: >0.62 ps from (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T other: >0.31 ps from (|a,p|g) 
J=1/2,5/2 from |g(|q) in {+67}Zn(p,n|g); |g to 7/2 rules out 1/2; |p=- from L(p,t)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J|<5/2 from |g(|q) of 1348|g and its decay to 1/2-, 167 level; measured cross section compatible with J=1/2 in {+67}Zn(p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 3/2+,5/2-,7/2+ from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g); L(p,t)=3 at 2374 {I2} rules out 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 7/2+,11/2- from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g); L(p,t)=4 at 2457 {I2} rules out 7/2+. J|p discrepant with L({+3}He,d)=(4) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J L(p,t)=2 at 2748 {I5}, L(d,n)=2 at 2748 {I15} and L({+3}He,d)=2 at 2770 {I20} give conflicting |p; may be a doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2- from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g); J|p=11/2+ obtained from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+57}Fe({+12}C,pn|g). The (|a,p|g) data could not resolve completely the 1343|g from the 1353|g; this may explain the discrepancy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2- from |g(|q) and linear polarization of 789|g and 1343|g (1978Al32). This experiment could not completely resolve 1343|g from 1353|g; which may explain J|p=11/2- obtained. J|p=11+/2 from {+57}Fe({+12}C,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
|Gp|G|g/|G=0.17 eV {I3} (1979Ra12); 0.32 eV {I6} (1972Sz01) 
E from E(p)=3333 {I5} resonance (1979Ra12). 
J from the identification of this resonance as the IAS of the 604 level in {+67}Zn 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
|Gp|G|g/|G=0.06 eV {I2} (1979Ra12) 
E from E(p)=3348 {I5} resonance (1979Ra12) 
J IAS of 604 level in {+67}Zn 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$ Deduced from the measured A(5{Is}{+2}{IS}{-1/2},{+67}Ga)=+978.0 {I61} MHz in 2017Fa09 and A(5{Is}{+2}{IS}{-1/2},{+71}Ga)=+1358.2 {I16} MHz (2010Ch16), relative to |m({+71}Ga)=+2.56227 {I2} (2005St24) and J({+71}Ga)=3/2. 
MOME2$ Deduced from the measured B(4{Ip}{+2}{IP}{-3/2},{+67}Ga)=+71 {I4} MHz in 2017Fa09 and B(4{Ip}{+2}{IP}{-3/2},{+71}Ga)=+39 {I2} MHz (2010Ch16), relative to Q({+71}Ga)=+0.107 {I1} (2008Py02). 
J$Directly measured using the hyperfine structure analysis in 2017Fa09. |p from |m and the proposed mixed |pp{-3/2} and |pf{-5/2} configuration (2017Fa09). 
$Isotope shift |d|n=+74 {I11} MHz, measured relative to {+71}Ga. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$from log| {Ift}=5.0 from 0+ in {+68}Ge |e decay. 
T$weighted average of 67.7 min {I3} (1960Gl04), 69.2 min {I14} (1961Ra06), 68.33 min {I9} (1965Eb01), 68.2 min {I1} (1965Bo42), 68.5 min {I5} (1971Oo01), 67.80 min {I8} (1971Sm02), 67.629 min {I24} (1983Iw02) and 68.2 {I7} min (2011Ra08). 
MOMM1$Atomic beam magnetic resonance (2001StZZ,1962Eh02) 
MOME2$Atomic beam magnetic resonance and atomic shielding calculations (2001StZZ,1972St38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$doublet in (d,|a) at 562. 
J$2 from Hauser-Feshbach analysis; |p from M1(+E2) 565|g to 1+ and L(d,t)=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 60 ns {I2} from (|a,n|g), 64 ns {I2} from {+55}Mn({+16}O,2pn|g),{+56}Fe({+15}N,2pn|g), and 62 ns {I6} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g). 
MOME2$TDPAD (2011StZZ,1985Ra33) 
MOMM1$TDPAD (2011StZZ,1978Fi03). Others: +0.707 {I14} (1973BaYF) and +0.72 {I2} (1985Ra33). 
J$7 from |g(|q); |p from E2 126|g to 5-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$Configuration: ((|p2p{-3/2})(|n1g{-9/2})){-6-} (1994Fi01). 
E$doublet in (d,|a) at 1321 {I4}. 
J$6 from |g(|q); |p from M1(+E2) 220|g to 5-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1340 {I4} in (p,n) and 1344 {I5} in (d,|a). 
E$doublet in (d,t) at 1336 {I3}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$strong population in (|a,d), assigned from expected configuration of ((|p1g{-9/2})(|n1g{-9/2})){-9+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from delayed pulse timing (1973BaYF); Other: 54 ns {I8} from delayed pulse timing (1976Mo22). 
G$from differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1973BaYF). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from pulsed-beam electronic timing (1978Fi03). 
G$obtained from the Larmor precession frequency of 1978Fi03 and weighted average of magnetic field (|b) measurements of 1967Ko28 and 1974KrZB. Other: g=+0.103 {I3} (using B from 1967Ko28) and +0.118 {I7} (using B from 1974KrZB). 
MOME2$from |g(|q,t) following recoil implantation (1980RaZG). 
$Configuration: |pf{-5/2}|ng{-9/2} (1978Fi03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2940 {I30} (1994Fi01) and 2880 {I30} (1969Lu07). 
J$from DWBA analysis (1994Fi01) and strong population in reaction and systematics (1969Lu07). 
$Configuration=((|p1g{-9/2})(|n1g{-9/2})){-9+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$2 from |g(|q) of 375|g (1968Bi03) and Hauser-Feshbach analysis (1993Ti03); |p from M1+E2 374.6|g to 1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+71}Ga,{+68}Ga)=-0.214 fm{+2} {I18}(stat) {I46}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
$Isotope shift |d|n({+71}Ga,{+68}Ga)=+46 MHz {I7}(stat) {I6}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
J$from {+68}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$From Adopted Levels of {+68}Ga in ENSDF database. 
T$From 1077|g(t) in 2016Ak04. Systematic and fitting uncertainties are included. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$From Adopted Levels of {+68}Ga in ENSDF database. 
T$weighted average of six measurements over three year period using two methods. Individual measurements are 67.802 m {I47}, 67.779 m {I36}, 67.790 m {I53} from ionization chamber measurements and 67.808 m {I55}, 67.855 m {I67}, and 67.728 m {I42} from HPGe measurements (2024Ra01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Ch16) and optical spectroscopy (1976Fu06), |p from L(p,t)=0 
MOMM1, MOME2$ from resonance cell laser spectroscopy. Others compiled by 2011StZZ. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 
B(E2): from Coul. ex. 
T$by pulsed beam delayed coincidences in Coul. ex. Others: <97 ps from {+69}Ga(p,p'|g); <330 ps from B(E2) and |d<0.6 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2): from Coul. ex. 
J from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,p'|g), |p from L(d,n)=3. 
T from DSA in {+69}Ga(|a,|a'|g). Others: 12.8 ps {I+17-13} from {+69}Ga(|g,|g'); 6.8 ps {I+44-31} from B(E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2): from Coul. ex. 
J from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g), |p from L(p,t)=0 
T$Others: 0.22 ps {I5} from Coul. ex.; 0.28 ps {I5} from {+69}Ga(|g,|g'); 0.27 ps {I+32-17} from B(E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2): from Coul. ex. 
J$from |g(|q) and |g yields in {+69}Ga(p,p'|g) and yield in (n,n'|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 
T$Inconsistent with <0.11 ps from (|a,p|g) but consistent with > 0.53 ps from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,p'|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 
B(E2): from Coul. ex. 
T$Others: 0.24 ps {I7} from {+69}Ga(|a,|a'|g); 0.23 ps {I3} from {+69}Ga(p,p'|g), 0.22 ps {I3} from {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); 0.240 ps {I+19-18} from (|g,|g'); 0.15 ps {I4} from DSA in Coulomb ex.; 0.15 ps {I3} from B(E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,p'|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 {I1}.4 {I7} 
B(E2): from Coul. ex. 
T$Others: 1.4 ps {I7} from {+69}Ga(p,p'|g); 1.04 ps {I+14-35} from {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g) ; 0.76 ps {I13} from DSA in Coul. ex.; 0.76 ps {I+14-10} from B(E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g), and |p from L(d,n)=3 
T others: 0.40 ps {I+18-10} from {+69}Ga(|g,|g'), |>0.97 ps from DSAM in {+68}Zn(p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) and |g yields in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g) and {+66}Zn(|a,p|g); |g to 5/2- 
T other: 0.38 ps {I+69-19} from DSAM in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,|g), and |p from L(p,t)=2 
T weighted average of 20 fs {I3} from {+69}Ga(|g,|g'), 20 fs {I10} from DSAM in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g), and 29 fs {I6} from DSAM in {+68}Zn(p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 at 1976 {I2} 
E$unresolved doublet at 1971 {I15} in {+68}Zn({+3}He,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-),5/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,|g), L({+3}He,d)=(1) gives |p=(-1) and prefers J=3/2 
T$others: 0.20 ps {I+11-6} from {+69}Ga(n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 
T$Others: 0.19 ps {I+8-5} from DSAM in {+68}Zn(p,|g) and 0.173 ps {I+13-11} in {+69}Ga(|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,|g), |p from L(p,t)=2 
T other: 29 fs {I12} from DSAM in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g), 40 fs {I7} in {+69}Ga(|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1/2 preferentially from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g); (3/2) from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,|g); |p from L(p,t)=2 If 3/2-, one would expect and L=0 component, however the isotropic |g(|q) rules out 3/2 
T other: 0.033 ps {I15} from DSAM in {+69}Ga(n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) and yield ratio in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); |p from L(p,t)=(3) 
T other: |>0.21 ps from DSAM in {+68}Zn(p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E possible doublet. J=(1/2,3/2) favored by |g decay modes in {+69}Ga(|g,|g') for possible level at 2565 {I4}; J|p=7/2+,9/2+ from L({+3}He,d)=4 for level at 2564 {I30}. J|p=5/2-,7/2- from L(d,{+3}He)=3 for level at 2560 {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$5/2,9/2 from |g(|q) and yield ratio in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); J|p=7/2+,9/2+ from L({+3}He,d)=4 for level at 2564 {I30} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
J J=9/2,11/2 from |g(|q) and yield ratio in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); |g from (15/2) makes J=9/2 unlikely 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) give J=9/2 or 13/2 and |g yields give 11/2 or 13/2 in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); |p from E2 to 9/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) consistent with J=11/2,13/2 or 15/2 and yields suggest J=15/2 or 17/2 in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); M1+E2 transition to 13/2 rules out 17/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) gives J=11/2 or 15/2 and yields give J<13/2 in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); |p from M1+E2 to 13/2(+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) gives J=17/2 or 13/2 and yields give J|>17/2 in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); |p from E2 to 13/2(+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2,13/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) consistent with J=11/2, 13/2 and 15/2; yields consistent with J=9/2,11/2 or 13/2 in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) consistent with J=11/2, 13/2 or 15/2; yield ratios favor J=15/2 or 17/2 in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); |p from M1+E2 to 13/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) and |p from linear polarization measurement in (|g,|g') 
T from |G in {+69}Ga(|g,|g') with J=5/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J 3/2 or 5/2 from |g|g(|q); 5/2 preferred from transition rate of 235|g (1975Pa22). 3/2 from |g|g(|q) (1976Ho09) 
K-capture probability for |b transition =0.876 {I27} (1992Be57) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J 5/2,7/2 from |g|g(|q) (1975Pa22), 7/2 preferred; 7/2 from |g|g(|q) (1969Kh10); 5/2 from |g|g(|q) (1976Ho09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(+)
level_comment:
J$9/2+ from |g(|q) and yields of 636|g and 484|g (1974Ha09); |p from L=4 (1970Bu23) 
L reported for a level at 1990 {I90} (1970Bu23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Authors suggest a possible doublet; however E=1488.14 with J|p=7/2- and E=1525.76 with J|p=3/2- from adopted levels suggests population in (d,n) of just the 7/2- level. 
S calculated for J=1/2 and J=5/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Probable doublet of E=1972.39 with J|p=9/2(+), and E=1973.10 with J|p(1/2)- from adopted levels 
S calculated for J=9/2 and J=1/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E reported by 1968Ok07 but not observed by 1970Co17. L=(1), C{+2}S'=0.68 (1968Ok07). Normalization factor not given. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$gW|G{-0}{+2}/|G=1.43 {I15} 
J 3/2 from dipole transitions from J|p=1/2 and 3/2 resonances; confirmed by |g(|q) of corresponding |g's (1973Mo05) 
|p: L(p,t)=0 
T 0.22 ps {I4} (1968La05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$gW|G{-0}{+2}/|G=10.3 {I6} 
J 3/2 from dipole transitions from J=1/2 and 3/2 levels; confirmed by |g(|q) of 5415|g (1973Mo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
J 1/2 from isotropic |g(|q) of 6874|g (1973Mo05) 
E$|G(0)>0.01 eV and <0.05 eV and |G(0)/|G<0.2 (1973Mo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$J from |g(|q) of 7306|g; |p from linear polarization measurement. |g(|q) gives J=5/2 and multi=D (1973Mo05) 
T$if J=5/2 and |G{-g}=0.105 eV 20 (1973Mo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
BE2$weighted average of 0.0066 {I10} (1972An17) and 0.0069 {I5} (1974LiZV). 
J 1/2-,3/2- from measurement of |g linear polarization (1965Al23) and |g(|q) (1964Al28). 
T by delayed coincidence with pulsed beam (1969Sh12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$0.149 ps {I26} from B(E2), adopted branching, and |d 
BE2$average of 0.034 {I5} (1972An17) and 0.0273 {I19} (1974LiZV). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$0.76 ps {I12} from B(E2) and adopted branching 
BE2 Average of 0.038 {I6} (1972An17) and 0.0288 {I26} (1974LiZV). 
J 7/2 from |g(|q) (1974LiZV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
J 13/2 uniquely from |g(|q) of 746|g; this is consistent with its yield function which gives J|>11/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2, 13/2 or 15/2 consistent with |g(|q) of 671|g; its yield ratio suggests 15/2 or 17/2, however, J=13/2 cannot be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$ Deduced from the measured A(5{Is}{+2}{IS}{-1/2},{+69}Ga)=+1067.7 {I18} MHz in 2017Fa09 and A(5{Is}{+2}{IS}{-1/2},{+71}Ga)=+1358.2 {I16} MHz (2010Ch16), relative to |m({+71}Ga)=+2.56227 {I2} (2005St24) and J({+71}Ga)=3/2. 
MOME2$ Deduced from the measured B(4{Ip}{+2}{IP}{-3/2},{+69}Ga)=+61 {I8} MHz in 2017Fa09 and B(4{Ip}{+2}{IP}{-3/2},{+71}Ga)=+39 {I2} MHz (2010Ch16), relative to Q({+71}Ga)=+0.107 {I1} (2008Py02). 
J$Directly measured using the hyperfine structure analysis in 2017Fa09. |p from |m and the proposed mixed |pp{-3/2} and |pf{-5/2} configuration (2017Fa09). 
$Isotope shift |d|n=+33 {I35} MHz, measured relative to {+71}Ga. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+71}Ga,{+69}Ga)=-0.116 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I28}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
$Isotope shift |d|n({+71}Ga,{+69}Ga)=+40 MHz {I4}(stat) {I4}(syst) (2012Pr11) 
J$from {+69}Ga Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 21.15 min {I5} (1977Sc10); 21.15 min {I6} (1975Bu07); and 21.10 min {I7} (1957Bu41). Other: 2015DuZZ 
J$J=1 from atomic beam (1976Fu06); parity from L(d,p)=1 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2012Pr11) 
%B-,%EC$from measurements of Zn K|a x-rays and 176|g in {+70}Ge (1977Sc10) 
$|d<r{+2}>{+71,70}=-0.096 fm{+2} {I21} (2012Pr11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) in (p,n|g) and E2 188|g to 2-. 
T$from |g|g(t) in (p,n|g). Others: 22 ns {I2} from |g|g(t) in {+68}Zn(|a,pn|g), 28 ns {I3} from recoil-|g|g(t) in {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g) (1997Is13). 
MOMM1$from TDPAD in {+69}Ga(d,p|g) (1976Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$in (n,|g) E=thermal two depopulating transitions of 612.3 keV and 755|g are observed while in {+67}Zn(|a,p|g) a single depopulating transition of 1263.5 keV is observed; the lack of overlap of depopulating transitions could indicate a closely spaced doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
J$Q 337|g to (5)-, yield function in (|a,p|g) consistent with J=7; tentative parity based on assumption that Q=E2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$L(d,p)=2+4 for 1822 {I2} and L(d,t)=1 for 1823 {I3} require two levels with opposite parities near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$difficulty in extracting information about the 185|g mixed with the strong 188|g makes this level questionable. 
J$|g(|q) suggests J=6 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=2.4 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 510 {I3} (1973Yn01), 506 {I6} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 0.52 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.54 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 653 {I3} (1973Yn01), 651 {I3} (1971Ar12) 
L,S$other: L=1, 1/4(2J+1)S=0.13 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.45 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 881 {I3} (1973Yn01), 875 {I5} (1971Ar12) 
L,S$other: L=4, 1/4(2J+1)S=1.4 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.225 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 904 {I3} (1973Yn01), 895 {I8} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 0.7 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.9 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1035 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1030 {I6} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 2.7 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.225 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1103 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1098 {I5} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 0.13+0.6 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.6 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1237 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1230 {I6} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 1.9 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.63 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1256 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1252 {I10} (1971Ar12) 
L,S$other: L=1, 1/4(2J+1)S=0.15 (1973Yn01). Note that L=1 is not consistent with Adopted J|p of this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$from 1973Yn01. Not consistent with L(d,t)=1 and Adopted |p=+. 
E$others: 1308 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1302 {I8} (1971Ar12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 1320 {I10} (1971Ar12). A 1330 keV {I3} level observed by 1973Yn01 could correspond to this or the 1336-keV level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.36 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1454 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1457 {I10} (1971Ar12) 
L,S$other: L=1, 1/4(2J+1)S=0.08 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$from 1973Yn01 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.33 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1537 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1534 {I10} (1971Ar12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.72 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1558 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1550 {I8} (1971Ar12) 
L,S$other: L=1, 1/4(2J+1)S=0.16 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.63 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1627 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1620 {I6} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 0.16 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.17 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1689 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1679 {I10} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 0.5 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$L=1 in (d,t) for E=1734 indicates a doublet 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.45 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$others: 1735 {I3} (1973Yn01), 1730 {I6} (1971Ar12) 
S$other: 0.11 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$L=1 in (d,t) for E=1822 indicates a doublet 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=0.15 mb/sr (1973Yn01). 
E$other: 1824 {I3} (1973Yn01) 
L,S$other: L=2, 1/4(2J+1)S=0.03 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$sum for doublet at 1010 keV and 1014 keV. 
E$others: 1018 {I10} (1973Yn01), 1019 {I5} (1971Ar12), likely both correspond to unresolved doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$sum for doublet at 1306 keV and 1313 keV. 
E$other: 1320 {I10} (1973Yn01). 
L,S$L=1, C{+2}S=0.12 (1973Yn01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$from Adopted Levels of {+70}Ga in ENSDF database. 
T$from 1039|g(t) in 2016Ak04. Systematic and fitting uncertainties are included. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$Nuclear rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.0118 fm {I18} (2013An02 evaluation) 
J$spin from optical spectroscopy (1932Ja04,1933Ca02) and collinear laser spectroscopy (2010Ch16). Parity from L(t,p)=0 from 3/2- target 
$Theoretical calculation of percentage occupation of the |pp{-3/2} and |pf{-5/2} orbitals in the ground state of {+71}Ga (2011Ma45) 
MOMM1$NMR method (1954Wa37), evaluated by 2019StZV. Other: 1948Be17. 
MOME2$+0.106 {I3} (1972St38,atomic beam magnetic resonance), 0.10 {I2} (1983Jo02,atomic beam laser fluorescence). Values recalculated as +0.109 {I2} (1998To31), +0.1040 {I8} (1998Pe11), and +0.107 {I1} (2018Py01) 
$In 2010Ch16 and 2012Pr11, |m and Q values, isotope shifts and change in radius values for the g.s. of {+71}Ga were used as calibrants for measurement of static moments of ground states of other odd-A Ga isotopes 
$Magnetic octupole moment=+0.180 {I5} (1957Sc28 recalculated original measurement of 0.146 {I20} in 1954Da26 by atomic and molecular beams) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$389.98|g |DJ=1 to 3/2-; L(d,{+3}He)=1 from 0+ 
T$deduced by the evaluators from B(M1)|^=0.83 {I34} (1991Ri08) in (e,e') and deduced |d(E2/M1)=0.0047 {I+35-30} based on B(M1)|^ and B(E2)|^ in (e,e'). It should be mentioned that deduction of B(M1)|^ value in (e,e') data may be model dependent. It is also of some concern that B(M1) values were not reported in authors' later work in 1994Ri07. Other: >2.8 ps from (|g,|g') 
$B(M1)|^ and B(E2)|^ from (e,e'). Other: B(E2)|^<0.00017 in Coulomb excitation. 


