# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 76.2 {I1} (1971Be53), 76.4 {I2} (1974HeYW) 
$|a(K)exp=1.82 {I20} (1989Ad10) 
MR$from 1989Ad10; +0.65 {I5} from L1/L3=0.75 {I10}, K/L=2.3 {I3} (1966Av02); sign from |g|g(|q) 
$L1:L2:L3=82 {I12}:91 {I14}:100 (1962Sc09), 75 {I10}:107 {I15}:100 (1966Av02) 
|a(K)exp=2.4 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 197.25 {I15} (1974HeYW) 
$|a(K)exp=0.139 {I8} 
$L1:L2:L3=125 {I19}:113 {I19}:100 (1962Sc09), K/L=3.0 {I5} (1966Av02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 22.2 {I7} (1989Ad09) and 24.6 {I3} (2014Mi17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0123 {I7} (1989Ad09) 
MR$from 1989Ad10; 0.00 {I4} from A{-2}=+0.056 {I9} (1970Va38) (601|g)(197|g)(|q) Others: -0.08 {I6} from A{-2}=+0.075 {I11} (1970Be67), -0.03 {I9} from A{-2}=+0.064 {I19} (1966Go26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 36.9 {I11} (1989Ad09) and 41.8 {I6} (2014Mi17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0094 {I5} (1989Ad09) 
MR$from 1989Ad10; -0.47 {I4} from A{-2}=+0.126 {I4} (1970Va38), -0.47 {I5} from A{-2}=+0.128 {I11} (1966Go26), -0.48 {I5} from A{-2}=+0.130 {I8} (1970Be67) via (678|g)(121|g)(|q); see also 1962Al19, 1962Sc09, 1964Mc17 
|a(K)exp=0.0087 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00363 {I21} (1989Ad09) (1970Be67) VIA (956G)(121G)(THETA). OTHERS: 1962Sc09, 1964Mc17, 1970Va38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 23.3 {I7} (1989Ad09) and 26.6 {I3} (2014Mi17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.00279 {I14} 
MR$from 1989Ad10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0014 {I4} (1989Ad09) 
M$from 1989Ad10; they propose M1(E1), but M1 is not compatible with the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$E1 from Adopted Gammas; M1+E2, |DJ=1 from A{-2}(exp)=0.11 {I2} from 1984Ba62 not adopted 
MR$|d=0.62 {I15} 12 or 2.8 {I11} 6 if M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2, |DJ=0,1 from A{-2}(exp)=-0.024 {I11} 
MR$|d=-1.0 {I7} if |DJ=1; -0.10 {I+15-12} or 2.1 {I10} 6 if |DJ=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$8.2 
$A{-2}=-0.36 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I8} ({+3}He,4n|g) 
M$D(+Q), |DJ=1 (1980Ko07); |D|p=no (1996Ur01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$100 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I9} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0051 {I+6-4} 
M$Q, |DJ=2, (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$688.2 in the decay scheme of 1996Ur01; 687.5 in the decay scheme of 1980Ko07 (not in the table of observed |g's); 688.5 in the decay scheme of 1980PiZU 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$11.0 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I2} 
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), M1+E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$14.3 
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I1} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.130 {I+20-50} 
M$E1, |DJ=0 according to 1996Ur01; Q, |DJ=0 (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$1.7 
$A{-2}=-0.27 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I10} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=-0.38 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (|a,3n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$36.4 
$A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I5} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=-0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} 
M$D, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), E1 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$4.8 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I4} 
M$D, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), E1 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$24.8 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.29 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I10} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0051 {I10} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$in the decay scheme of 1980Ko07 but not in their table of |g rays, while 285.5|g from this level in |g table but not in the decay scheme, which signals a typographical error. 258|g confirmed by 1996Ur01 
RI$3.1 
$A{-2}=-0.21 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I3} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (|a,3n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$33.5 
$A{-2}=+0.40 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I8} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=-0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I3} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0067 {I+10-15} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$9.1 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} ({+3}He,4n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I10} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$20.1 
$A{-2}=0.36 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I5} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I5} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$9.4 
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I2} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=-0.27 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (|a,3n|g) 
M$(D+Q), |DJ=1 (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$2.7 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I8} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I10} (|a,3n|g) 
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$8.5 
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0011 {I3} 
M$D, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), M1 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$25.7 
$A{-2}=+0.51 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I6} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0033 {I15} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$10.4 
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I6} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I10} 
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), M1+E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$8.9 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.18 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I10} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$7.8 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I6} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=-0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0045 {I+20-15} 
M$D, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), M1 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$10.1 
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.300 {I100} 
M$D, |DJ=1 (|g(|q)), M1 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$7.3 
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (|a,3n|g) 
M$E1 according to 1996Ur01; D, |DJ=1, (M1) (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$6.7 
$A{-2}=+0.58 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I15} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.35 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I6} (|a,3n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (1980Ko07); E2 according to 1996Ur01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$5.7 
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I5} ({+3}He,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I8} (|a,3n|g) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0058 {I+15-30} 
M$Q, |DJ=2 (|g(|q)), E2 (|a(K)exp), (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M E1+M2 with |d=+0.026 {I13} from {+148}Sm |b{+-} decay, +0.08 {I4} from (HI,xn|g), and <0.4 from (n,n'|g). However, RUL estimate of |d is |<0.007 and the evaluator has set the mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR +0.25 {I10} or -1.5 {I5} from |g|g(|q); -0.03|<|d|<+1.02 from |g(|q,T); all from {+148}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from Ice data in {+148}Eu |e decay. M1+E2 from (n,n'|g); however, since this |g is doubly placed in this reaction, the result is suspect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR +0.42 {I10} or +2.0 {I5} from |g|g(|q); +0.55 {I+17-11} or -2.8 {I+11-9} from |g(|q,T) all from {+148}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=2.5|*10{+-3} {I8} (1970GrYP) 
MR +0.026 {I13} (1977Ka14); |d|<0.18 from |<3%, M2 mixing (1970GrYP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI absolute I|g=22.2% {I5} (1971Ca23), 24.3% {I25} (1971Mo04), 24% {I2} (1962Re03), 23% {I5} (1963Ba31) 
|a(K)exp=4.7|*10{+-4} {I14} (1963Ba31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I4} (1970GrYP), 0.0020 {I4} (1963Ba31) 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |d from |g(|q,t) (1984Kr09) 
The mixing ratio, |\q(E{-0}/E{-2})|\=0.55 {I14}; and the ratio X(E{-0}/E{-2})=0.014 {I7}, both calculated using the given |d, Rossel conversion coefficients (1978Ro22), and weighted average of |a(K)exp= 11.7|*10{+-3} {I10} (1984Kr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR +0.25 {I10} or -1.5 {I5}, from |g|g(|q) (1985Si16), -0.03|<|d|<+1.02 from |g(|q,t) (1984Kr09) 
The mixing ratio, 1.1|<|\q(E{-0}/E{-2})|\|<26; and 0.085|<X(E{-0}/E{-2})|<50; both calculated using -0.03|<|d|< 1.02, Rossel conversion coefficients (1978Ro22), and weighted average |a(K)exp=9.7|*10{+-3} {I9} (1984Kr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q,t) (1984Kr09). Others: -2.5 {I5}, -4.5 {I15}, or -0.55 {I20} from |g|g(|q) (1985Si16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q,t). Second possible value |d=-0.38 {I+16-34} is not compatible with |a(K)exp data (1984Kr09). |d=1.9 {I+25-6} from E2=78% {I17} (1987Ad08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR +0.42 {I10} or +2.0 {I5} from |g|g(|q) (1985Si16); +0.55 {I+17-11} or -2.8 {I+11-9} from |g(|q,t) (1984Kr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from (|g,|q,t) (1984Kr09). Others: 1.1 {I+8-4}, from %M1=45 {I24} (1987Ad08), -1.0 {I4}, or -0.8 {I+2-15} (1985Si16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 1985Si16. Other: -0.05 {I+14-11} or +1.05 {I25} (1984Kr09) 
The mixing ratio, |\q(E{-0}/E{-2})|\=0.65 {I30}; and the ratio, X(E{-0}/E{-2})=0.07 {I7}, both calculated using |d=+1.05 {I25}, Rossel conversion coefficients (1978Ro22), and weighted average of |a(K)exp=2.39|*10{+-3} {I33} (1984Kr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 2005Li14 
RI$quoted by 2005Li14 as from 2000Bh03 
$B(M1)=0.0147 {I19} (2005Li14); B(E2)=1388|*10{+-4} {I150} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from 2005Li14; other: 1465 (1993Zi05) 
RI$quoted by 2005Li14 as from 2000Bh03 
$B(E1)=0.98|*10{+-5} {I8} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
E,RI$quoted by 2005Li14 as from 2000Bh03 
$B(M1)=0.205 {I41} (2005Li14); B(E1)=2.26|*10{+-5} {I46} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2512.3 {I5} (1993Zi05) and 2513.5 {I2} (2005Li14) 
RI$from 2005Li14 
$B(M1)=0.0361 {I19} (2005Li14); B(E1)=0.400|*10{+-5} {I21} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2762.1 {I5} (1993Zi05) and 2763.2 {I9} (2005Li14) 
RI$from 2005Li14 
$B(M1)=0.1480 {I79} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3037.6 {I5} (1993Zi05) and 3039.0 {I4} (2005Li14) 
RI$from 2005Li14 
$B(M1)=0.0339 {I19} (2005Li14); B(E1)=0.374|*10{+-5} {I21} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3080.9 {I5} (1993Zi05) and 3082.2 {I2} (2005Li14) 
RI$from 2005Li14 
$B(M1)=0.1219 {I86} (2005Li14); B(E1)=1.348|*10{+-5} {I95} (2005Li14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.167 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.033 {I12} 
MR weighted average of +2.33 {I11} (1997Go20), and +2.26 {I22} (1985GoZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.091 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I11} 
MR weighted average of -0.57 {I3} (1997Go20) and -0.56 {I3} (1985GoZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.09 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I14} 
MR weighted average of -0.56 {I3} (1997Go20) and -0.55 {I4} (1985GoZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M M1+E2, |d=-0.91 {I9}; A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1997Go20); M1+E2, |d=-0.80 {I7} (1985GoZL); however, since this |g is doubly placed, this result is suspect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} 
MR weighted average of -0.19 {I5} (1997Go20), and -0.22 {I4} (1985GoZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M E2; A{-2}=0.29 {I7}, A{-4}=0.04 {I9} (1997Go20). However, since this |g is doubly placed, this result is suspect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2}; |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I10} (1985Si16) 
DCO=0.99 {I1}; lin pol=0.54 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1979Ha19; 0.15 {I+16-9} from |a(exp) (1979Ha19) 
M A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I2} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=30|*10{+-4} {I6} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.63 {I5}; lin pol=0.21 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=60|*10{+-4} {I5} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=0.98 {I2}; lin pol=0.18 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I13} (1979Ha19) 
|d(M2/E1)=0.03 {I5} from |g(|q); 0.10 {I+7-12} from |a(exp) (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.67 {I2}; lin pol=0.40 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I3}, |a(K)exp=1.8|*10{+-2} {I3} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=1.7|*10{+-2} {I2} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.00 {I2}; lin pol=0.49 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.45|*10{+-2} {I10} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=0.40|*10{+-2} {I10} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=0.98 {I3}; lin pol=0.49 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I4} (1985Si16) 
DCO=1.00 {I5}; lin pol=0.31 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=0.022 {I10} (1979Ha19) 
|d(M2/E1)=0.04 {I8} from |g(|q); 0.09 {I+8-15} from |a(exp) (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.78 {I5}; lin pol=0.44 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=0.007 {I3} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=0.99 {I2}; lin pol=0.55 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.38 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I9}, |a(K)exp=0.017 {I4} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (1979Ha19) 
MR from 1979Ha19; 0.50 {I+15-13} from |a(exp) (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.74 {I15}; lin pol=-0.8 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, |a(K)exp=31|*10{+-4} {I12} (1979Ha19) 
|d(M2/E1)=0.04 {I4} from |g(|q); 0.16 {I+12-20} from |a(exp) (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.67 {I2}; lin pol=0.22 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.37 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.016 {I4} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.05 {I5}; lin pol=0.42 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I10} (1985Si16); |a(K)exp=0.0065 {I20} (1979Ha19) 
DCO=1.00 {I5}; lin pol=0.46 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.57 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I8}; |a(K)exp=0.016 {I3} (1985Si16) 
MR from 1979Ha19 
DCO=2.3 {I2}; lin pol=-0.12 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.38 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5}; |a(K)exp=0.059 {I9} (1985Si16) 
DCO=1.81 {I2}; lin pol=0.43 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+149}Eu |e decay, value is from 2011In01. Others: 22.519 {I8} (1982Me10) and 22.494 {I11} (1970An17) 
MR$from subshell ratios in {+149}Eu |e decay (2011In01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 18.3 {I11} from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay, 17.93 {I23} from {+149}Eu |e decay, and 16.9 {I6} from (|a,n|g). Others: 97 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) and 46 {I12} from (|m{+-},2n|g) are discrepant 
MR$+0.6 {I4} from |g(|q,t) in {+149}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q,t) in {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay. Others: <0.1 from |g(|q) in in-beam |g-ray; <0.8 from ce data in {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$|g(|q,t) data in {+149}Eu decay. Others: -0.03 {I4} from |g(|q) in in-beam |g ray, +0.27 {I+30-45} from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$others: 9.6 {I17} from Coulomb excitation; 16.5 {I23} from (|a,n|g) and 19 {I8} from (|a,3n|g) are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 9.6 {I6} from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay, 23.1 {I19} from {+149}Eu |e decay, 8.3 {I17} from (|a,n|g), and 8.1 {I17} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.6 {I6} from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay, 8.3 {I17} from (|a,n|g), and 8.1 {I17} from (|a,3n|g). Other: 23 {I2} from {+149}Eu |e decay seems discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 76 {I4} from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay, 85.5 {I27} from {+149}Eu |e decay, 88 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 96 {I27} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 13.9 {I17} from (|a,3n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Poor fit, deviates by 0.28 keV 
RI$from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay. Others: 3.5 {I8} from Coulomb excitation and 4.5 {I18} from (|a,3n|g); 2.27 {I22} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant 
M$ce data in in-beam |g-ray 
MR$|g|g(|q) in {+149}Pm |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 26.9 {I18} from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay, 25 {I9} from {+149}Eu |e decay, 24.0 {I22} from (|a,n|g), 31.3 {I18} from (|a,3n|g), and 22.7 {I14} from Coulomb excitation 
M$|g(|q,pol) in in-beam |g-ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,3n|g). Others: 100 {I4} from {+149}Pm |b{+-} decay, 100 {I9} from {+149}Eu |e decay, 100 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 100.0 {I26} from Coulomb excitation 
M$ce data in in-beam |g-ray 
MR$|g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 4.92 {I25} from (|a,n|g), 4.6 {I7} from (|a,3n|g), and 3.5 {I7} from Coulomb excitation 
M,MR$|g(|q,pol) in in-beam |g-ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.09 {I+10-15} from ce data, and -0.02 {I10} from |g(|q) data (1979Ha19) in {+148}Nd(|a,3n|g),{+150}Nd({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+149}Eu |e decay (2011In01), |g not observed in {+149}Pm |b{+-} 
RI$from I|b(22.5 level)<46% (see comment for I|b to 22.5 level). For I|b(22 level)=0%, I|g(22|g)|?0.2 
M,MR$from {+149}Eu |e decay; |d(E2/M1) from ce measurements by 2011In01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/100 decays=3.1 {I2} (1966Mc11). Others: 1970Ch09, 1960Bu06 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1984Pr04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.075 {I8}, K/L=6.5 {I7}, L/M=4 {I1} (1960Ar05). Others: |a(K)exp=0.16 {I5}, K/L=9.0 {I15} (1960Sc08), K/L=8.0 {I25} (1952Ru10) 
$A{-2}=+0.097 to +0.30 in |g(|q,t) (1984Pr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from {+149}Eu |e decay 
$(281|g)(277|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I5} (1976MiZJ). Consistent with |d=0.14 from {+149}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 22.4999 {I9} deduced from an average of nine conversion electron lines and 22.5012 {I17} from gamma-ray spectroscopy, both measured by 2011In01. Others: 22.519 {I8} (1982Me10) and 22.494 {I11} (1970An17) 
$Relative I|g=55.5 {I20} (1992Ca11), 59.6 {I25} (1982Me10), 56.8 {I40} (1976Ga10) 
$%I(|g+ce)=84 {I4} from I|g and |a. From Ice(22|g)/Ice(277K)=185 {I8} (1970An17), %I(|g+ce)=56 {I3}. The ce data of 1966Av05 give %I(|g+ce)(22|g)=82. Discrepancy is probably due to problems in finding relative ce intensities 
M,MR$from 2011In01 for penetration parameter |L=-2 {I10} (2011In01). |d=0.0742 {I18} for |L=2.9 {I12} and 0.0722 {I20} for |L=1.5 {I15} Other: 0.0715 {I11} (1981Ar17,1970An17) 
$Subshell ratios from ce data: L2/L1=0.30 {I2}, 0.30 {I2}; L3/L1=0.30 {I2}, 0.29 {I2}; M2/M1=0.29 {I2}, 0.29 {I2}; M3/M1=0.32 {I2}, 0.31 {I2}; N3/N1=0.25 {I6}, 0.26 {I5}; P1/N1=0.013 {I2}, 0.014 {I3}; (O2+O3)/O1=0.59 {I7}, 0,64 {I8}. First value for Eu{-2}O{-3}, second for EuF{-3} (2011In04) 
$Measured electron intensities (2011In01): L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N3:P1:O1:O2+O3::(49.1 {I3}):(14.5 {I2}):(14.7 {I2}): (10.9 {I1}):(3.1 {I1}):(3.5 {I1}):(2.4 {I2}):(0.6 {I2}):(0.03 {I1}):(0.32 {I3}):(0.21 {I2}) 
$L- and M- subshell ratios. Weighted average of values deduced from 1981Ar17 and 1970An17. 1981Ar17 give following Ice values relative to ce(K)=100 for 277|g. ce(L1)=10640, ce(L2)=2756 {I85}, ce(L3)=2809 {I85}, ce(M1)=2490 {I150}, ce(M2)=585 {I64}, ce(M3)=585 {I64}, ce(N)=745 {I110}, ce(O)+ce(P)=160 {I53}. Values from 1970An17 are: ce(L1)=9100 {I700}, ce(L2)=2590 {I180}, ce(L3)=2560 {I170}, ce(M1)=2050 {I50}, ce(M2)=590 {I80}, ce(M3)=570 {I120}, ce(N)=800 {I100}, ce(O)+ce(P)=200 {I50}. Others: 1966Av05, 1962Wa32, 1961Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=15.8 {I2} (1992Ca11), 15.73 {I20} (1982Me10), 15.8 {I2} (1976Ga10) 
MR$from |g(|q) in in-beam |g-ray. |g(|q,t) in {+149}Eu |e decay gives +0.6 {I4} (1981KrZS); |d(E2/M1)<0.9 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=86.9 {I5} (2004Mi43), 88.4 {I4} (1992Ca11), 88.1 {I10} (1982Me10), 88.2 {I3} (1976Ga10) 
$Measured I|g/100 decays=4.13 {I3} (2004Mi43), 3.55 {I4} (1982Me10) 
MR$from |g(|q) in in-beam |g-ray. Others: |g(|q,t) in {+149}Eu |e decay gives +0.036 {I18} (1981KrZS); |d(E2/M1)<1.0 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=100.0 {I6} (2004Mi43), 100 (1992Ca11), 100.0 {I10} (1982Me10), 100.0 {I4} (1976Ga10) 
$Measured I|g/100 decays=4.75 {I4} (2004Mi43), 4.03 {I4} (1982Me10) 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1981KrZS). Other: <0.6 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)(theory)=0.028 is used for normalization of ce data for other transitions 
$Relative I|g=8.7 {I3} (1992Ca11), 8.91 {I10} (1982Me10), 9.6 {I2} (1976Ga10); NRM weighted average taken. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$1982Me10 deduce |a(L)exp=0.05, incorrectly 
$Relative I|g=0.52 {I5} (1992Ca11), 0.571 {I25} (1982Me10), 0.45 {I1} (1976Ga10); NRM weighted average 
MR$from ce data and |g|g(|q) assuming |d(328|g)=+0.27 {I40} (1980Kr15). 
$(179|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.114 {I36}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1980Kr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=13.60 {I8} (1992Ca11), 13.45 {I13} (1982Me10), 14.5 {I2} (1976Ga10); NRM weighted average 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1981KrZS). Other: >1.8 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=12.10 {I4} (1992Ca11), 12.73 {I13} (1982Me10), 13.0 {I2} (1976Ga10); NRM weighted average 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$1982Me10 give |a(K)exp=0.13, |a(L)exp=0.04, which cannot be reproduced from their intensity data 
$Relative I|g=0.28 {I3} (1992Ca11), 0.323 {I25} (1982Me10) 
MR$from |g(|q) in in-beam |g-ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=0.53 {I3} (1992Ca11), 0.571 {I25} (1982Me10) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1980Kr15) 
$(281|g)(277|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.043 {I35}, A{-4}=-0.032 {I40} (1980Kr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=1.35 {I4} (1992Ca11), 1.117 {I25} (1982Me10), 1.1 {I1} (1976Ga10); NRM weighted average 
M$from |a(K)exp (1982Me10) 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1981KrZS). Other: >3 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$1982Me10 give |a(K)exp=0.0086 and assign M1+E2. But from authors' intensities evaluators deduce |a(K)exp=0.28 which is too high for an M1+E2 assignment. Evaluators suggests that Ice(K)=0.96 {I8} (1982Me10) is in error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$From authors' intensities, evaluators deduce |a(K)exp=0.10 {I1}. Evaluators suspect that Ice(K)=0.96 {I8} (1982Me10) is in error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.4 or |?+6 from |g(|q) (1979Ha19); >0.8 from |a(K)exp in 1979Ha19 
RI$mostly contributed by an impurity. From the Adopted Gammas, I|g should be |?1.4. I|g=1.3 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=0.01 {I8} from |a(K)exp, +0.20 {I10} from |g(|q) (1979Ha19) 
RI$complex peak in ({+3}He,4n|g) 
$I|g=2.4 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19) 
$|g(|q) and |a(K)exp for complex peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.02 (or <+6.5) from |g(|q) (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=100 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 100 (1994Ba01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$value given by 1979Ha19 is too high; probably contributed largely by a contaminant. I|g=2.4 (1977Kl04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$other: 1.8 {I+25-6} from |a(K)exp in 1979Ha19 
$I|g=15.4 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 20.5 {I4} (1994Ba01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=92.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 65.3 {I6} (1994Ba01) 
$Positive sign of A{-4} in 1979Ha19 in ({+3}He,4n|g) seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.6 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 3.01 {I11} (1994Ba01) 
M$|g(|q) data consistent with |DJ=0, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.09 {I+10-15} from |a(K)exp, -0.02 {I10} from |g(|q) (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=23.0 in (|a,3n|g) for a complex peak (1979Ha19), 39.5 {I3} (1994Ba01) 
$I|g(198|g)/I|g(125|g)=13.2 (1994Ba01) is high by a factor of |?2, as compared to results from many other studies. It is likely that I|g(198|g) as reported by 1994Ba01 contains contribution from an impurity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I8} from |a(K)exp, -0.06 {I3} from |g(|q) (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=60.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 48.6 {I3} (1994Ba01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-6.5 {I25} from |g(|q) for a complex line (1979Ha19) 
$Complex |g, contaminated by a line in {+56}Fe 
$I|g=2.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.29 {I11} for 314.2+316.7 (1994Ba01) 
M$|g(|q) data in 1979Ha19 and pol value in 1990UrZW consistent with |DJ=0, M1 transition (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Kl04. This |g is not reported by 1979Ha19 
M$assigned by evaluators from |g(|q) data in 1977Kl04 
$I|g=1.8 (1977Kl04), 1.69 {I12} (1994Ba01) 
$|g from 1977Kl04, 1976SiZW and 1994Ba01. This |g was unplaced in 1977Kl04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I+7-6} from |a(K)exp, -0.02 {I5} from |g(|q) (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=22.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 25.2 {I4} (1994Ba01) 
$I|g(493|g)/I|g(451|g)=3.3 (1994Ba01) is low by a factor of |?2 
$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I9} from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=3.5 {I15} from |a(K)exp, +2.5 {I10} from |g(|q) (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=4.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 3.7 {I4} (1994Ba01, |g not placed) 
$Evaluators assume that A{-4} listed in Table 3 of 1979Ha19 from (|a,3n|g) refers to A{-2}, instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Fig. 11 in 1979Ha19; E|g=735.2 in authors' Table 3 is a misprint 
$I|g=2.9 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1994Ba01, I|g=4.55 {I12} (1994Ba01). Placement is shown in 1990UrZR and 1994Ba01 
$I|g(121|g)/I|g(614|g)=0.114 {I3} (1994Ba01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=55.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19). E|g and I|g not listed by 1994Ba01, although, transition is shown in the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=10.4 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 3.01 {I24} (1994Ba01) 
$I|g(735|g)/I|g(651|g)=0.61 (1994Ba01) is low by a factor of |?16 
M$|a(K)exp in 1979Ha19 gives |d(E2/M1)>2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.60 {I30} from |g(|q), 0.42 {I15} from |a(K)exp (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=2.5 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 2.03 {I11} (1994Ba01, |g unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.06 {I7} from |g(|q), 0.13 {I9} from |a(K)exp (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=31.3 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 37.3 {I4} (1994Ba01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.1 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 14.0 {I3} (1994Ba01) 
M$assigned by evaluators from pol value in 1990UrZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.25 {I20} from |g(|q), 0.85 {I40} from |a(K)exp (1979Ha19) 
$I|g=3.3 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 3.02 {I17} (1994Ba01, |g unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=7.0 in (|a,3n|g) (1979Ha19), 2.95 {I24} (1994Ba01) 
$I|g(781|g)/I|g(472|g)=0.24 (1994Ba01) is low by a factor of |?30 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$E|g=626.0 {I17}, I|g=2.04 {I20} (1994Ba01) 
$I|g(626|g)/I|g(791|g)=2.1 (1994Ba01). But 626|g is likely a complex |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Partial |g-ray |s (mb)=25 {I3} 
E$|g from Fig. 3 and text in 2010Da13, not shown in level-scheme Fig. 1 of 2010Da13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 333.92~{I3} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 333.9~{I1} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 333.971~{I12} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 333.9~{I2} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 333.94~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 333.9~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
M$from K/L of 1967Pr08.. 
BE2W$From B(E2)(|^)=1.32 {I6} (Coul. ex.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 406.51~{I3} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 406.5~{I1} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 406.52~{I5} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 406.49 {I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
BE2W$From B(E2)(2+ to 0+)=0.051 {I5} (Coul. ex.). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 740.4~{I5} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 740.6~{I1} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
TI,M$from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 439.38~{I7} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 439.401~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 439.3~{I2} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 439.39~{I7} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 439.6~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
M$from {+149}Sm(n,|g) E=th. 
BE2W$From B(E2)(2+ to 4+)=0.96 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 305.7~{I2} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 305.4~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 305.70~{I8} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 305.68 {I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 712.22~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 712.2~{I1} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 712.205~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 712.2~{I3} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 712.23~{I15} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1046.12~{I8} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1046.2~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 1046.12~{I8} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1047.9~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$from 1973PrZI. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 297.9~{I2} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 298.061~{I14} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 298.06~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 5.1~{I9} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 6.71~{I16} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 7.6~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 737.50~{I8} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 737.455~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 737.5~{I3} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 737.47~{I17} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 737.6~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I7} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 100.0~{I20} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 100~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 425.33~{I7} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 425.3~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 425.10~{I7} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 3.0~{I3} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 3.1~{I6} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 2.2~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 831.85~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 831.8~{I1} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 831.92~{I25} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 831.28~{I24} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$from 1966Sm03 in (n,|g) mult=E2 on basis of |a(K)exp. From 1973PrZI, mult=E1 on basis of |a(K)exp. Mult=E1 on basis of |g(|q) and |a(K)exp from 1969Re11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$on basis of |a(K)exp, 1966Sm03 give mult=E2, but other authors assign E1. On basis of |g(|q) and |a(K)exp, 1969Re11 assign E1. 
E$weighted average of 1165.77~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1165.7~{I2} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 1165.74~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1165.1~{I13} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$weighted average of 420.1~{I5} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 420.48~{I9} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 2.3~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1.3~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 453.48~{I16} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 453.38~{I10} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 453.40~{I6} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$|a(K)exp allows E1 or E2 but E1 ruled out by decay scheme. 
RI$weighted average of 3.0~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 3.3~{I6} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 4.1~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 859.95~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 860.1~{I5} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 859.867~{I18} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 859.28~{I20} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 70~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 50~{I13} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 73.5~{I12} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 85~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1193.87~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1193.7~{I2} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 1193.826~{I24} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1193.1~{I7} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$|g(|q) studies support E2 (1969Re11). 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 100~{I22} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 100~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 100~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 209.45~{I12} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 209.4~{I1} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 209.36~{I2} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 7.2~{I16} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 10.4~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 921.61~{I16} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 921.7~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 921.2~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I8} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)), 100~{I13} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,RI$observed only in ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
E$E0 transition to ground state reported by 1963Gr18. Energy and intensity as given are from 1976Ba18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 505.521~{I25} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 505.4~{I1} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 505.44~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 505.5~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
M$from K/L in {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 78.7~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 78.76~{I1} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 0.157~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 0.37~{I18} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 286.293~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 286.28~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 0.19~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 0.28~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 584.274~{I12} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 584.3~{I2} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 584.24~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 584.5~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 100~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$from |g(|q) and |a(K)exp mult=E1 (1969Re11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 251.60~{I10} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 251.596~{I25} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 251.56~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 41~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 43.4~{I22} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 46~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 345.93~{I8} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 345.955~{I19} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 345.93~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I11} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 100~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 100~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+E0)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1083.33~{I8} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1083.34~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1082.6~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 41~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 41.0~{I24} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 44~{I6} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 377.73~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 377.74~{I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$from {+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 403.36~{I10} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 402.97~{I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed by 1969Re11 through |g(|q) studies. 
RI$weighted average of 47.2~{I19} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 45~{I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 675.856~{I25} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 676.1~{I3} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 675.77~{I14} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal), 675.6~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
RI$weighted average of 100.0~{I19} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 100~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 310.82~{I8} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 310.73~{I4} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 458.4~{I2} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 458.36~{I6} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 458.17~{I6} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 3.2~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 3.3~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 10.0~{I19} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 731.06~{I16} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 731.220~{I24} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 731.31~{I16} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed by 1969Re11 through |g(|q) studies. 
RI$weighted average of 26~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 25.2~{I7} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 33~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1170.9~{I3} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1170.587~{I24} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1170.2~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed by 1969Re11 through |g(|q) studies. 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I12} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 100.0~{I14} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 100~{I19} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y). 
E$weighted average of 284.995~{I26} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 285.01~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$weighted average of 9.0~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 11.5~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 448.789~{I12} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 448.68~{I6} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 571.259~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 571.21~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed in |g(|q) aligned. 
RI$weighted average of 22.3~{I5} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 26~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 596.53~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 596.34~{I18} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
RI$from {+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 869.256~{I14} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 869.21~{I20} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed in |g(|q) aligned. 
RI$from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1308.675~{I23} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1308.1~{I9} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed by 1969Re11 through |g(|q) aligned. 
RI$weighted average of 48.2~{I10} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 48~{I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 492.56~{I8} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 492.33~{I21} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 911.0~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 910.88~{I4} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 910.73~{I25} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1350.7~{I5} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1350.29~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1347.9~{I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$confirmed in |g(|q) aligned. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 461.761~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 461.59~{I6} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$determined by 1973MeZX from |a(K)exp data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 748.057~{I12} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 749.31~{I17} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 773.283~{I15} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 773.97~{I24} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1485.49~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1489.3~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
$This and some of the other |g rays which are shown as originating at the 1819-keV level could energetically be assigned to the 1821- or the 1822-keV level instead. 1966Sm03 assigned the 1489-keV transition to the 1821-keV level in (n,|g), but 1977Si12 assigned it to the 1819-keV level in |e decay. 
M$1966Sm03 suggest (E2)(M1) mixture (doublet) on basis of |a(K)exp while 1973MeZX give E2 on basis of |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 372.728~{I25} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 372.75~{I5} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 464.11~{I7} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 464.09~{I8} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 542.972~{I25} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 542.95~{I9} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 
M$from (n,|g) and {+150}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 558.1~{I1} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 558.1~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 917.44~{I16} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 917.7~{I6} ({+150}Eu |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1223.28~{I6} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1223.0~{I2} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1629.79~{I4} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1629.4~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1963.71~{I8} ({+150}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68 h)), 1963.0~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (12.8 h)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 756.51~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 756.2~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1261.98~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1263.2~{I6} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 272.79~{I9} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 272.82~{I3} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 590.71~{I11} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 590.85~{I10} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 816.44~{I8} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 816.19~{I23} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1321.91~{I3} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 1323.6~{I7} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 509.84~{I5} ({+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y)), 510.01~{I9} ({+149}Sm(n,|g) E=thermal) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$used to normalize branching in (n,|g) and |e decay(36.9~y). 
M$from (n,|g) and {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 311.2~{I2} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 311.3~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
M$from |a(K)exp in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0075 {I20} 
E$weighted average of 511.9~{I5} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 512.1~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
RI$due to the overlap of the 512.1-keV peak with the annihilation peak, the authors obtained this relative intensity from coincidence data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 549.0~{I5} ({+148}Nd(|a,2n|g) E=26~MeV), 549.5~{I3} ({+150}Nd(|a,4n|g) E=45~MeV) 
M$from (|a,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1977Si12 do not see this line in singles, but have inconclusive coincidence evidence for its presence in spectra gated by the 584.26-keV |g ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+E0)
decay_comment:
E$1973MeZX give E|g=370.71 {I2} and place this transition as originating from levels 1417 and 1819. 
RI$from I|g/I|g(346|g)=0.20 {I4} in |b-decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
$Seen only by 1973MeZX, 1978MeZK; placed on basis of energy fit. 
RI$0.41 {I5} is value for multiplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=1.12 {I9} for the doubly placed transition and I|g=0.83 {I17} deduced for the component from the 1417 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1973MeZX declare this to be a double linewidth I|g=10.4 {I7}. See 1976Ba18, page 252, for discussion. I|g(tot. Peak)=10.4 {I7}. From |b{+-} decay 0.92 {I12} may be placed from the 1046.14 level leaving I|g=9.5 {I7} for placement from the 1819 and 2117 levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(peak)=2.35. 1976Ba18 deduced I|g from (n,|g) data. 
$Coincidence data of 1977Si12 do not support this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$a 340-342 doublet interpreted by 1973MeZX as M1/E2. 1976Ba18, from other data, consider an E0/E1 mix. 1977Si12 assign this |g ray to the 2024.60 level, noting the difficulties with the multipolarity assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$1963Yo07 found no 740-keV photon. 1968Ku10 attribute all or most of their 740 peak to summing. ce(K) reported by 1961Ha23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$assumed E2 by 1966Sm03 (|a(K)=0.0325) for normalization of electron and photon data. Mult=E2 from K/L (1967Pr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(272)/I|g(712)=0.014 {I5} in |b{+-} decay and I|g(712)=3.07 {I21}. 
M$1966Sm03 attribute E2 and E1+M2 character to this apparent doublet. The E2 assignment would be in agreement with a transition from the 1046 level, while the E1+M2 assignment would be appropriate for a transition from the 2095 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1),(E2)
decay_comment:
RI$the total intensity reported by 1966Sm03 for this multiply placed |g ray is 1.77 {I18}. For this level one can estimate I|g=0.25 {I4} from I|g(1047|g)/I|g(712|g)=0.081 in |b{+-} decay and I|g(712|g)=3.07 {I21} (n,|g) thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$|a(K)exp+|a(L)exp given, calculated from |a(K)exp (1966El05) and |eL/|eK (1956Ch21). 
E$E0 transition to ground state reported by 1963Gr18. Energy and intensity are from 1976Ba18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$multiplet in (n,|g) and |e. I|g deduced by 1976Ba18 from E1,E2 mixture in (n,|g) data. I|g(peak)=0.031 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+E0)
decay_comment:
RI$a wt av of I|g(1083|g)/I|g(251|g) from |e and |b{+-} decays is 0.95 {I7}. From I|g(251|g)=0.23 {I2} in (n,|g) thermal one expects I|g(1083|g) from level 1417 to be 0.22 {I3}. The measured I|g(1083|g) is 0.35 {I4} so that there is an excess of 0.35 {I4}-0.22 {I3}=0.13 {I5} for possible placement elsewhere. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(310)/I|g(1170) in {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y) and I|g(1170) in 1966Sm03. I|g(peak)=0.066 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Assigned to 1713.27-keV level on basis of {+150}Pm |b{+-} decay data. But, an inconsistency of branching results from this placement: I|g(548|g)/I|g(1379|g)=0.013 {I5} from |b{+-}, 0.083 {I8} from (n,|g) thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Assigned to 1713.27-keV level on basis of {+150}Pm |b{+-} decay data. From I|g(667)/I|g(1379)=0.050 {I10} in |b{+-} decay one expects I|g(667)|<0.024 from decay of this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1969Re11 assign a 773 |g ray to level 2191 but the branching ratios for I|g(773)/I|g(749) in |e decay and (n,|g)thermal indicate there is little or no intensity left for a second placement of I|g(773). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$the total intensity reported by 1966Sm03 for this multiply placed |g ray is 1.77 {I18}. For this level one can estimate I|g|<0.20 from I|g(1047|g)/I|g(1485|g) in |e decay and I|g(1485|g)|<0.42 (estimated by evaluator). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g(adopted) taken from E decay is 1485.49 {I3}. 
$This, and some of the other |g rays which are shown as originating at the 1819-keV level, could energetically be assigned to the 1821- or the 1822-keV level instead. 1966Sm03 assigned the 1489-keV transition to the 1821-keV level but 1977Si12 assigned it to the 1819-keV level. 
M$1966Sm03 suggest (E2)(M1) on basis of |a(K)exp while 1973MeZX give E2 on basis of |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$1966Sm03 suspect this to be a doublet with E1 and E2 components. E1 agrees with the conversion electron data of {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9 y). 
RI$the total intensity reported by 1966Sm03 for this multiply placed |g ray is 1.77 {I18}. For this level one can estimate I|g|<0.5 from I|g(1047|g)/I|g(751|g) in |e decay and I|g(751|g)<0.2 (estimated by evaluator). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Placed in decay scheme by 1973MeZX in |e decay. The branching ratio I|g(756)/I|g(1262) is 0.246 {I16} in |e decay and 0.21 {I7} in (n,|g)thermal, leaving open the possibility that excess 1262|g may exist in (n,|g)thermal for placement elsewhere. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=0.098 {I10} for the doubly-placed 272.8|g and I|g=0.043 {I16} for the placement from the 1046 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$the total intensity reported by 1966Sm03 for this multiply placed |g ray is 1.77 {I18}. For this level one can estimate I|g|<0.08 from I|g(1047|g)/I|g(1343|g) in |e decay and I|g(1485|g)|<0.2 (estimated by evaluator). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
EKC,ELC$Calculated from I|g=0.033 {I5} (1969Re04) and I{-ce}(K)=0.0013|*10{+-3} {I9}, I{-ce}(L)=0.0002|*10{+-3} {I1} (1970Pa20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$Experimental value was normalized to theory. 
M$this transition was taken to be pure E2 in order to normalize electron and |g-ray intensities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$intensity per 100 decays reported by 2018Sa22, based on summed |g-transition intensity to the g.s. as 90%, allowing 10% |b feeding for the g.s. Compiler's note: absolute intensity of 334|g was determined as 75.0% {I8} in 1977Ho09, and evaluated as 68% {I4} in the ENSDF dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(712|g)(334|g)(|q) data plotted in Fig. 9 of 2018Sa22, but A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients not listed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$T{-1/2}({+150}Pm decay)=2.6 h {I1} from decay curve for 737|g 
$(737|g)(334|g)(|q) data plotted in Fig. 9 of 2018Sa22, but A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients not listed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.018 {I25} from |g|g(|q) for 1 |) 2 |) 0 cascade 
$(831.5|g)(334.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.270 {I27}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I30} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$T{-1/2}({+150}Pm decay)=2.7 h {I1} from decay curve for 1324|g 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.046 {I35} from |g|g(|q) for 2 |) 2 |) 0 cascade 
$(1324.1|g)(334.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.216 {I42}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I46} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$compiler's note: possibly a sum line in 2018HaAA, as this line was not reported in any of the previous studies. 
$T{-1/2}({+150}Pm decay)=2.7 h {I1} from decay curve for 1658|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.024 {I25} from |g|g(|q) for 1 |) 2 |) 0 cascade 
$(1379.2|g)(334.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.276 {I28}, A{-4}=0.000 {I31} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.03 {I11} from |g|g(|q) for 2 |) 2 |) 0 cascade 
$(1735.7|g)(334.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.270 {I72}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I78} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$T{-1/2}({+150}Pm decay)=2.6 h {I1} from decay curve for 2069|g 
E$compiler's note: possibly a sum line in 2018HaAA, as this line was not reported in any of the previous studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.026 {I19} from |g|g(|q) for 2 |) 2 |) 0 cascade 
$(2033.1|g)(334.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.231 {I51}, A{-4}=+0.012 {I55} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$compiler's note: possibly a sum line in 2018HaAA, as this line was not reported in any of the previous studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this |g does not fit the level scheme, deviates by 3 keV. 2018Sa22 pointed out that this transition may deexcite a separate level at 2701 keV. Compiler assigns this transition as tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$placement of this |g confirmed by 2018Sc08 from |g|g-coin. In results from (n,|g), the placement of this |g was rejected 
$(273|g)(439|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.26 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(252|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} 
$(252|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(437|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I10} 
$(437|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.58 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(612|g)(712|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.123 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} 
$(612|g)(1046|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.49 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(621|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I10} 
$(621|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.60 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(904|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} 
$(904|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(1024|g)(712|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.168 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I32} 
$(1024|g)(1046|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(1214|g)(712|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.141 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} 
$(1214|g)(1046|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$placement of this |g confirmed by 2018ScAA from |g|g-coin. In results from (n,|g), the placement of this |g was rejected 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(209|g)(712|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.153 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.440 {I24} 
$(209|g)(1046|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.24 {I8}, A{-4}=+1.14 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(252|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I10} 
$(252|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.18 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
$(1084|g)(334|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I10} 
MR$magnitude of |d, without any sign specification 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(437|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I11} 
$(437|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.534 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(621|g)(832|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.05 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} 
$(621|g)(1166|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.46 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$2018Sc08 give 100 {I3}, but in the opinion of the compiler, uncertainty for this branching ratio is redundant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$2018Sc08 give 100 {I5}, but in the opinion of the compiler, uncertainty for this branching ratio is redundant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$placement of this |g confirmed by 2018Sc08 from |g|g-coin. In results from (n,|g), the placement of this |g was rejected 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$ce data in (n,|g) give mult=E2(+M1) with |d>1 which disagrees with mult=(E1) from proposed J{+|p}'s 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1963Ge10) 
RI$from decay scheme, deduced I(|g+ce)=58% {I12} which gives I|g=0.27~{I7}. Feeding to g.s. and 4.8 level=10% {I3} 
$ce(M1:M2:M3:M4:M5)=1.0:0.50~{I10}:0.76~{I15}:0.021~{I8}:0.011~{I4} (1963Ge10) 
$ce(N1,N2,N3,N4,N5,O1,O2,O3) also observed but ratios not given (1963Ge10) 
MR$from M1/M2 and M2/M3 ratios (1963Ge10). Other M subshell (1963Ge10) give |d<0.07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(L2/L3)=1.14~{I5} (1985GrZT) 
MR$from Ice(L2)/Ice(L3) (1985GrZT). Sign from |g|g(|q). Others from |g|g(|q): -0.30~{I10} (1975Wa02), -0.20~{I2} (1981Ya07); -0.06~{I14} (1977Ho21), -0.24~{I16} (1974Si12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(L1/L2)=9.1~{I5} (1985GrZT) 
MR$from Ice(L1)/Ice(L2) (1985GrZT). Sign from |g|g(|q). Others from |g|g(|q): -0.10~{I4} (1975Wa02), -0.10~{I5} (1981Ya07), -0.07~{I7} (1977Ho21), -0.099~{I23} (1977Bu12), -0.16~{I10} (1974Si12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(L1/L2)=5.35~{I51} (1985GrZT) 
MR$from Ice(L1)/Ice(L2) (1985GrZT). Others from |g|g(|q): +0.13~{I+30-16} (1975Wa02), 0.14 (1971Be23),|>0.15 (1977Bu12), -0.45~{I25} (1974Si12). Sign of |d uncertain 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$deduced from |g|g (1973Co29). From summing of Ice of 1964Be10, I(|g+ce)=2.6 {I9} 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a for mult and |d as given 
$Ice(L1)=1, Ice(L2)=5.3~{I10}, Ice(L3)=6.3~{I10}, Ice(M)=2.5~{I10}, Ice(M2)=Ice(M3)=1, Ice(N)=1 (1964Be10) 
MR$from L subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$ce(L1/L2)=14.5~{I26} (1985GrZT) 
MR$from Ice(L1)/Ice(L2) (1985GrZT). Others from |g|g(|q): -0.02~{I1} (1981Ya07), +0.15~{I25} (1977Bu12), +0.06~{I8} (1974Si12). From |g(|q) |d=+0.01~{I3} (1975Wa02). ce data (1964Be10) give |d<0.12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(L1/L2)=9.3~{I10} (1985GrZT) 
MR$from Ice(L1)/Ice(L2) (1985GrZT). Sign from |g|g(|q) others from |g|g(|q): -0.13~{I6} (1977Ho21), -0.076~{I23} (1977Bu12), -0.14~{I8} (1974Si12),<0.12 (1971Be23). From |g(|q), |d=-0.10~{I3} (1975Wa02). ce data give 0.20~{I5} (1964Be10), 0.12~{I4} (1962Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
ICE(K)=4.1, ICE(L)=0.76 10, ICE(L1)=0.76, ICE(M)=0.17 5 (1964Be10). OTHERS: 1963Ma16, 1962Ha24 
$|a(K)exp=0.0090~{I14} (1963Bu02), 0.102~{I14} (1965Be13). Direct measurement of |a(K)exp from internal and external conversion of 340|g. This transition used for normalization of ce data for other transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$DCO(1)=1.45~{I10}, DCO(2)=2.5~{I3}. DCO(1) is inconsistent with expected |DJ=2; DCO(2) is marginally consistent with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.30~{I3}, A{-4}=-0.13~{I8} (1976Co12). DCO(1)=1.01~{I3}, DCO(2)=2.86 {I7} 
A2=+0.33 2, A4=-0.07 2 (1976Ge03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.47~{I5}, A{-4}=+0.14~{I9} (1976Co12). DCO(2)=1.29~{I5} 
A2=-0.54 2, A4=+0.01 2 (1976Ge03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.51~{I8}, A{-4}=+0.21~{I10} (1976Co12). DCO(2)=1.28~{I6} 
A2=-0.62 2, A4=+0.02 2 (1976Ge03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.34~{I10}, A{-4}=-0.07~{I2} (1976Ge03). DCO(1)=1.01~{I3}, DCO(2)=2.90~{I8} 
A2=+0.25 5, A4=-0.05 10 (1976Co12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. E|g=502.6 in table 1 (1994Kh01) 
$DCO(2)=1.3~{I3} consistent with |DJ=1, D+Q; 1994Kh01 assign |DJ=1, E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.59~{I7} (1976Co12). DCO(1)=2.28~{I6}, DCO(2)=1.28~{I3} 
A2=-0.60 2, A4=+0.01 2 (1976Ge03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.37~{I7} (1976Co12). DCO(1)=2.22~{I6}, DCO(2)=1.20~{I6} 
A2=-0.45 2, A4=+0.01 3 (1976Ge03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.36~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.09~{I2} (1976Ge03). DCO(1)=1.00~{I3}, DCO(2)=2.88 {I9} 
A2=+0.31 4, A4=-0.06 10 (1976Co12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$424.20~{I25} (1976Co12) 
$DCO(1)=1.37~{I9}, DCO(2)=1.65~{I20}. DCO(1) suggests |DJ=1 with significant D+Q admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.33~{I8}, A{-4}=-0.22~{I13} (1976Ge03). These values suggest |DJ=0, D+Q; but adopted |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=3.5~{I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.60~{I21}, |a(L2)exp=0.62~{I22}, |a(L3)exp=0.36~{I15} 
MR$adopted value=-0.22~{I2} (see adopted |g's) which gives |a=6.02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=3.7~{I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.9~{I4}, |a(L2)exp=1.6~{I6}, |a(L3)exp=1.0~{I4} 
MR$adopted value=-0.076~{I9} (see adopted |g's) which gives |a=6.04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.36~{I12}, |a(L)exp=0.19~{I5}. ce data give mult=E2(+M1) with |d>1. However, proposed J{+|p}'s of 315.3 and 168.4 levels give E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$This |g feeds 821.98 and/or 822.78 level. Mult(4773|g)=(E1) and adopted J{+|p}'s for the 822 doublet suggest deexcitation from 821.98 level, although energy agreement favors deexcitation from the 822.78 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR |d(E2/M1)=+19 {I+5-4} (1982La26); I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=6.5 {I3} ({+152}Eu |e decay (13.517 y)) 
CC from {+152}Eu |e decay (13.517 y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR |d(E2/M1)=2.1 {I3} (1982La26, Coulomb excitation). I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=10.0 {I6} ({+152}Eu |e decay (13.517 y)) 
CC from {+152}Eu decay (13.517 y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp in 13-y Eu |e decay gives |d(M2/E1)=0.24~{I+4-6}; however this value of |d, assuming that the measured T{-1/2} is correct, gives B(M2)(W.u.)>260. The RUL limit is 1, and suggests |d<0.014 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$From Coulomb excitation. Others: <38 from (n,n'|g), 12 from (|a,2n|g) 
M$Dipole from angular distribution. |D|p=yes from placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$The measured |d gives a value of B(M2)(W.u.) much larger than the RUL limit of 1, suggesting that the |d value is too large. RUL<1 requires |d<0.007 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$|a=0.0053~{I3} for |d=-0.5~{I2}, and 0.0041~{I3} for |d=-1.6~{I4} 
MR$-0.5~{I2} or -1.6~{I4} 
RI$From Coulomb excitation. I|g/I|g(1193|g)=0.564~{I23} from (|a,2n|g), <0.33 from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From (n,n'|g). E|g=982.19~{I23} is reported in Coulomb excitation, and E|g=981.0~{I3} in 4.12-min Pm |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Assigned in Coulomb excitation to the 1944.6 level, and in (n,n'|g) to the 1945.1 level. The E|g data in (n,n'|g) agree well with placement from the higher-energy member of the doublet, suggesting that Coulomb excitation is exciting both members of the doublet; however, none of the other transitions from this level is seen in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From Coulomb excitation and not included in the least-squares adjustment which gives E|g= 283.08~{I8}. This transition is not reported in (|a,2n|g); however, in that reaction a 276|g is seen and placed feeding the 1764~{I5}- level. No 276|g is reported in Coulomb excitation. The two works are from the same group 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Rounded-off value from the least squares adjustment, which gives E|g=756.37~{I10}. The value 759.9~{I3} reported in Coulomb excitation may be a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Rounded-off value from the least squares adjustment, which gives E|g=486.09~{I13}. The value 487.03~{I9} reported in Coulomb excitation may be a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(958|g)=0.086~{I9} in 13-y {+152}Eu |e decay compared with 0.7~{I+5-4} here suggests that this |g does not belong with the 1768 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0092~{I21}. |a(K)exp gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>0.8; however, placement from a J=0 level rules out any admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from 1979Ar16 
TI$Weighted average of Ice(K)=0.020~{I2} (1979Ar16) and 0.0163~{I16} (1986Pa14) with Ice(K)/|S\ Ice=0.880 (E0 theory). The evaluator has adjusted the value from 1986Pa14, quoted as Ice(K)/I|g(563|g)=0.0094~{I17}, to correspond to the present Ice(K)/I|g intensity scale and adopted I|g(563|g) 
M |a(K)exp>0.5 (1979Ar16); K/L>5.9 (1975Sc32); |r=0.26 {I3} (1990Ka35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.037~{I4} and |d(Q/D)=+19~{I+5-9} one gets mult=E0+M1+E2 
MR |d(E2/M1)=+19 {I+5-4}, I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=6.5 {I3} (adopted |g's) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from 1979Ar16 
TI$Weighted average of Ice(K)=0.013~{I2} (1979Ar16) and 0.0096~{I30} (1986Pa14) with Ice(K)/|S\ Ice=0.878 (E0 theory). The evaluator has adjusted the value from 1986Pa14, quoted as Ice(K)/I|g(961|g)=0.0062~{I19}, to correspond to the present Ice(K)/I|g intensity scale and adopted I|g(961|g) 
M |a(K)exp>0.1 (1979Ar16); |r<0.1 (1990Ka35) 
I(ce(K))/I|g(961|g)=0.0062 {I19} (1986Pa14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From 2007Ku20. Others: 1.49~{I14} (1973MeXQ), 1.5~{I4} (1971Ba63). the transition is not seen by 1975Pr05 
M |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from 1979Ar16 
TI$From Ice(K)=0.0010~{I5} (1979Ar16) and Ice(K)/Ice=0.880 (E2 theory) 
M |a(K)exp>0.1 (1979Ar16); |r<0.016 (1990Ka35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00051 {I13} 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (weighted average from 1960De16 and 1959Wo52) 
Looked for monoenergetic positrons, I|b{++}/I|g(1389)<3.4|*10{+-7} (1985Co23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI,M$I|g =82.5~{I25} for a peak that includes a {+150}Nd impurity line. |a(K)exp=0.036~{I6}, A{-2}=0.289~{I14}, A{-4}=-0.04~{I2}, and lin pol=+0.50~{I4} for the doublet. The impurity line is a 6+ to 4+ transition, presumably with mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.07~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.06~{I3}; |a(K)exp=0.041~{I6}; lin pol=-0.28~{I6}; |d(E2/M1)=+6~{I+9-2} gives |a(K)=0.055~{I1} 
CC$From Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=+0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I3}; lin pol=-0.20 {I8}; |a(K)exp=0.027~{I3}. |d(Q/D)=+1.6~{I3} gives |a(K)=0.0080~{I4} 
CC$From Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$The authors report I|g=2.44~{I7} in singles, and 2.0~{I4} in |g|g so there is possibly a small part of this intensity that could belong elsewhere 
M,RI A{-2}=+0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}; lin pol=+0.44 {I16}; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I8}; lin pol=-0.30 {I12}; 
$|a(K)=0.00210 (E2 theory) used as a calibration point 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$The authors report E|g=380.6~{I2} with I|g=0.90~{I4}. I|g=0.7 is assigned to the 1506 level from |g|g, and I|g=0.2 is assigned as an impurity line. A{-2}=-0.17~{I9} and A{-4}=-0.03~{I10}, lin pol=+0.06~{I14} are determined for the composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=+0.28~{I3}, A{-4}=-0.02~{I5}; |a(K)exp=0.0053~{I15}. From |g(|q), |d=-0.5~{I2} or -1.6~{I4}. From |a(K)exp, |d<1.2 so the small solution is favored 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.34 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.17 {I4}; lin pol=+0.32 {I10}; |a(K)=0.0015 (E2 theory) used as a calibration point 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I8}; -0.45<|d(Q/D)<+1.0; |a(K)exp=0.058 {I9} 
CC$From Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$The data are conflicting. The authors suggest mult=E2 and/or M1 from A{-2}=+0.39~{I4}, A{-4}=+0.06~{I6}, lin. pol=+0.8~{I2}, and |a(K)exp=0.0077~{I19}. from Adopted Levels, J{+|p} is 4+, requiring mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.49 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I10} the authors assign mult=M1+E2, with |d=-2.8~{I+12-7}. This assignment is in conflict with the adopted J{+|p}=(4-) for the 1821 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.49 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I16}; |a(K)exp=0.039 {I17}; |d=+0.3~{I5} gives mult=M1+(E2). |a(K)(M1)=0.0214 compared with |a(K)exp=0.039~{I17} suggests the possibility of an E0 component 
CC$From Adopted Gammas for mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.00867, the E2 theory value, is used for normalization of I|g and Ice(K) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI,M$The authors report I|g=1.32~{I5} and A{-2}=+0.35~{I4}, A{-4}=-0.16~{I5}, lin pol=+1.0~{I2} for the 294|g and an impurity line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI,M$The authors report I|g=4.1~{I3} and A{-2}=-0.15~{I6}, A{-4}=+0.10~{I18}, lin pol=+0.48~{I7}, and |a(K)exp=0.0021~{I5} for the 717|g and an impurity line. The impurity line is E2, so |a(K)exp is consistent only with mult(717.9|g)=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$The authors determine E|g=843.7 with I|g=3.8 for this placement from the 2348 level and an impurity line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI,M$The authors report I|g=2.82~{I9} and A{-2}=+0.29~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.02~{I4}, lin pol=+0.59~{I10} for the 430.2|g and an impurity line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI,M for 375.5|g+impurity doublet: I|g=5.76 {I18}, A{-2}=+0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3}; lin pol=+0.35 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I9}; lin pol=+0.4 {I2}; |a(K)exp<0.003 for the 684.6|g and the known 684.7 E0 transition from the 684.7 level. |a(K)=0.00486 for E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g/I|g(867|g+1112|g)=0.00115~{I6} in Adopted Gammas, one expects I|g=0.102~{I12}. Most of the intensity of this transition must belong elsewhere 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Transition looked for by 1986Be12 but only an upper limit could be obtained. Not reported by 2009GaZR. The 10+ member of the g.s. band is thus probably not populated in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=961.27~{I8}. The entry May be a typo. The transition is seen with this placement in other datasets 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=664.71~{I4}. The entry May be a typo. The transition is seen with this placement in other datasets 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=852.66~{I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=160.58~{I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=540.98~{I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=1390.49~{I5}. The entry May be a typo. The transition is seen with this placement in other datasets 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Authors' value of 748.2~{I6} appears to be a misprint. E|g=738.8~{I7} from the least-squares fit, and E|g=737.84~{I7} in (n,n'|g). The evaluator assumes that the energy should be 738.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=1540.71~{I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$In (n,n'|g) a doublet is proposed at 1945 with the 1260|g being placed from the second member of the doublet. See Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=820.64~{I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=1239.07~{I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=1637.84~{I11}. The entry May be a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=510.27~{I16}. The entry May be a typo, otherwise the placement must be incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=623.98~{I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=681.09~{I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=766.35~{I10}. The entry May be a typo. The transition is seen in (|a,2n|g) with this placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=1892.37~{I14}. The entry May be a typo, otherwise the placement must be incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=756.34~{I10}. The entry May be a typo, otherwise the placement must be incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment for the level energies. This adjustment gives E|g=767.16~{I6}. The entry May be a typo, otherwise the placement must be incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Value of 1969Va09 is excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.661~{I10} (1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1978Ar24, 1967Ma29). K/L=1.73~{I3} (1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1978Ar24, 1957Ke08). L2/L1=2.58~{I12} (1981Ka40), 2.43~{I24} (1978Ar24), 2.30~{I26} (1967Ma29), 2.297~{I13} (1970SpZW), 2.22~{I4} (1957Ke08). L3/L1=2.66~{I13} (1981Ka40), 2.45~{I24} (1978Ar24), 2.260~{I15} (1970SpZW), 2.27~{I26} (1967Ma29), 2.16~{I5} (1957Ke08). The E2 theory values are 2.439 and 2.415 for L2/L1 and L3/L1, respectively, so the values of 1970SpZW and 1957Ke08 are 9.0% {I17} and 5.9% {I6} low for L2/L1, and 6.4% {I6} and 10.0% {I21} low for L3/L1, respectively. The experimental L2/L3 values agree well with theory, 1.016~{I5} for 1970SpZW and 1.028~{I24} for 1957Ke08 compared with 1.010 for E2 theory. L/M=4.34 {I7} (1960Mu05, 1957Ke08). M2/M1=2.72 {I5} (1970SpZW), 3.4 {I1} (1957Ke08). M3/M1=2.76 {I10} (1970SpZW), 3.3 {I2} (1957Ke08). The E2 theory values are 2.72 and 2.76, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Values of 1993Ka30, 1990St02, and 1970No06 are excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0809~{I16}, K/L=3.91~{I9} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1978Ar24, 1967Ma29). |a(L)exp=0.0210~{I9} (1991Go22). |a(M)exp=0.00466~{I14} (1983KaZJ). L2/L1=0.78~{I3} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40, 1967Ma29). L3/L1=0.61~{I3} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40). Other: L3/L1=0.39~{I4} of 1967Ma29 is discrepant. E2 theory values are |a(K)=0.0808, K/L=3.90, |a(L)=0.0207, |a(M)=0.00465, L2/L1=0.772, L3/L1=0.603 
MR$From |g|g(|q), 1985KrZU report |d(M3/E2)=-0.01~{I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0357~{I11} (1990Ka35, 1981Ka40, 1991Go22, 1967Ma29). |a(K)(E2 theory)=0.00479, and from the evaluation of 1982La26 one has |d(E2/M1)=19~{I+5-4}, which gives |a(K)(theory)=0.00480. from these data one gets Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)=6.4~{I3}. |a(M)exp=0.0019~{I4} (1983KaZJ). K/L=7.0~{I8} (1991Go22), other: 7.2~{I13} (1967Ma29). The value of 4.0~{I4} reported by 1981Ka40 is discrepant. L/M=3.3~{I5} (1991Go22), other: 3.3~{I14} (1967Ma29). I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=6.1 {I15}, |r=0.23 {I2} (1990Ka35); 
MR |d(E2/M1)=+19 {I+5-4} (adopted gammas (1982La26), includes 1973Ka05,1971Ru05,1970RaZF). Other: +31 +|2-17 (1985KrZU) 
From (ce(K))(|g)(|q) 1973Ka05 deduce penetration parameter -365|<|l|<+290 and |d(E0/E2)=2.47 {I31} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0037~{I5} (1991Go22, 1983KaZJ, 1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)= 0.00557 (M1), 0.00331 (E2) which give |d>1.2. Placement to 0+ requires pure mult 
RI$The value of 1970Ri19 is excluded 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990St02. The value of 212.569~{I15} reported by 1990Me15 is not consistent with the level energy difference of 212.516~{I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Exclude 1970Ri19 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0491~{I15} (1991|g022, 1990Ka35, 1985Co08, 1982TrZV, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). The value for 1991Go22 is deduced by the evaluator from the authors' unresolved ce intensity for ce(K)(656|g)+ ce(L)(615 E0 in Gd). K/L=4.5~{I+29-15} (1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.00931 (M1) and 0.00536 (E2), and from the evaluation of 1982La26 one has |d=+2.1~{I3}, which gives |a(K)(M1+E2 theory)=0.00611~{I18}. From these data one gets Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)= 8.0~{I3} and Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(M1+E2)=7.0~{I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00127~{I19} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.00104 (E1), 0.0104 (M2). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.09~{I12} (1985KrZU), 0.16~{I+5-10} from |a(K)exp, <0.07 from RUL (B(M2)(W.u.)<1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1977Ge12 are excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.106~{I19} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.0862 (M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -8.0 {I6} (1985KrZU) and -9.6 {I3} (1982La26). Other: -7.5 {I+5-25} (1992De29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00202~{I5} 91985co08, 1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). |a(L+...)exp=0.000281~{I17} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.00277 (M1), 0.00178 (E2). |a(L)+(theory)=0.000467 (M1), 0.000315 (E2). from |a(K)exp, |d=2.1~{I+6-3}, and from |a(L+...)exp, no M1 component is required. placement in the decay scheme is to the 0+ g.s., so pure mult is required. Note that 1991Go22 report |a(K)exp=0.00180~{I8}, consistent with mult=E2; however, 1981Ka40 report |a(K)exp=0.00212~{I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From 2007Ku20. Others: 0.18~{I2} (1993Ka30), 0.15~{I3} (1990Me15), 0.17~{I2} (1990St02), 0.12~{I1} (1980Sh15),|?0.04 (1975LeZH), |<0.02 (1972Bb05), 0.06~{I2} (1971Ba63) 
M$The adopted T{-1/2}=0.76~ps~{I14} for the 1234 level, and |d(Q/D)=1.0~{I6} rule out mult=E1+M2 
MR$From linear polarization (2002Za07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00302~{I20} (1985Co08, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). Other: the value of 0.00441~{I25} from 1981Ka40 seems discrepant. |a(L)exp=0.040~{I3} (1991Go22, 1982TrZV, 1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.00473 (M1), 0.00285 (E2) and |a(L)(theory)=0.000632 (M1), 0.000414 (E2). From |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp one gets |d>2.0 and >3.6, respectively 
MR$Unweighted average of -6.5~{I3} (1982La26), -6.9~{I+7-8} (1985KrZU) -5.3~{I4} (2008ZaZY) 
MR from 1982La26. Other: -6.9 {I+7-8} (1985KrZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 1998Hw07 is excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00184~{I12} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). |a(L)exp=0.000226~{I12} (1991Go22). Other: 0.00035~{I5} (1982TrZV). |a(K)(theory)=0.00262 (M1), 0.00170 (E2) and |a(L)(theory)=0.000348 (M1), 0.000235 (E2). |a(K)exp gives |d>1.6 and |a(L)exp gives |d>6.0 
MR from 1982La26. Others: -34 {I+6-8} (1992De29), -8.1 {I+6-7} (1985KrZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04 
RI$The 209|g is a triplet with I|g=0.0209~{I20}. 2004Ca04 determine I|g=0.0045~{I15} for placement from the 1643 level in Gd, and 0.0162~{I26} for placement from the 1293 level in Sm. A third placement is from the 1318 level in Gd, whose intensity from branching in Tb |e decay is 0.0099~{I4}. The sum of these components is 0.0213~{I30}, consistent with the value measured for the triplet 
RI$Unweighted average of 0.0241~{I10} (2007Ku20) and 0.0162~{I26} (2004Ca04). the transition is a doublet and is not resolved in the other works 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 1975LeZH is excluded 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.045~{I10} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.0197 (E1), 0.0742 (E2), 0.500 (M2). This gives mult=E1+M2 with |d=0.24~{I+4-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 2007Ku20, 1990Me15, and 1972Bb05. The other works May include the 330.58|g from the 1372 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$The 482|g is placed from the 1293 level in Sm and from the 1606 level in Gd. 2007Ku20 resolve the Sm component which constitutes 92% of the total intensity. The evaluator assumes that the measured energy can be assigned to this placement 
M$|a(K)exp=0.054~{I12} (1991Go22, 1990Ka35, 1982TrZV). The value for 1991Go22 is deduced by the evaluator from the authors' unresolved ce intensity for Ice(K)(482|g)+Ice(L)(444|g doublet). |a(K)(theory)=0.0201 for mult=M1 and 0.0116 for E2 give Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)=3.6~{I10} for mult=E0+E2, and Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(M1)=1.7~{I6} for mult=E0+M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 2007Ku20, 1990Me15, and 1972Bb05. The value of 0.28~{I4} given in 1990Me15 is assumed by the evaluator to be |a mistake and is taken as 0.028~{I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0028~{I3} (1990Ka35, 1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.00333 (M1), 0.00208 (E2) 
MR from 1982La26. Other: -3.9 {I25} (1985KrZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 0.72~{I5} given in 1990St02 is probably a misprint. the evaluator assumes that the value should be 1.72~{I5} and includes it in the weighted average 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0108~{I8} (1991Go22, 1982TrZV, 1967Ma29). Note that the reported values are all smaller than the E1 theory value of 0.0130 
MR -0.00 {I3} (1985KrZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0118~{I9} (1991Go22,1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.0194 (M1), 0.0112 (E2) 
MR from 1970Ba32. Other: +4.5 {I+18-11} (1985KrZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.000490~{I26} ( 1985Co08, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). Other: the value of 0.00060~{I4} from 1981Ka40 seems discrepant. |a(K)(theory)= 0.000481 (E1), 0.00347 (M2). |a(L)exp=0.000061~{I3} (1991Go22). |a(L)(theory)=0.0000610 (E1), 0.000478 (M2) 
MR$An unweighted average of A{-2} and A{-4} values from |g|g(|q) data of 1973Ka05, 1970Ba32, 1970He29, 1970RaZF, 1970Ru09, 1969Aq01, 1969La09 and 1992De29 give |d=+0.043~{I3} 
Monoenergetic e+ observed, for data see 1972Sv02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04. The transition is not fully resolved in the other works from the 344|g in Gd 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2007Ku20. The transition is also placed in Gd and is unresolved in the other works. The placement in Sm is dominant and the evaluator assumes that the measured energy can be assigned to this placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990St02. The value of 556.562~{I27} reported by 1990Me15 is not consistent with the level energy difference of 556.458~{I12}. The value May be a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00059~{I5} (1991Go22, 1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.000624 (E1). other: the value of 0.00024~{I7} from 1967Ma29 is discrepant 
MR$0.00 {I2} (combined results of 1973Ka05, 1970He29, 1971Ba54, 1970Ba32, 1969Aq01). Others: +0.04 {I2} (1985KrZU), -0.007~{I17} (2008ZaZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1977Ge12 are excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00050~{I8} (1967La13). |a(L)(theory)=0.000453 (E1) 
MR 0.00 {I3} (1985KrZU), 0.00 {I6} (combined results of |g|g(|q) (1970Ba32,1970He29,1969Aq01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Transition not seen. E|g is a rounded-off value from the E(level) difference and I|g is the limit determined by 2007Ku20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Transition not seen. E|g is a rounded-off value from the E(level) difference and I|g is the limit determined by 2007Ku20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 2007Ku20. Others: 0.068~{I6} (1993Ka30), 0.056~{I5} (1990Me15). the high values are inconsistent with data in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0070~{I4} (1981Ka40) and 0.0036~{I17} (1967Ma29) do not agree. |a(K)(theory)=0.00283 (E1), 0.00775 (E2). Placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 
MR +0.07 {I+11-9} (1985KrZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 1970Ri19 is excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00040~{I3} (1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.000418 (E1) 
MR -0.01 {I3} (1985KrZU), -0.01 {I6} (1970Ba32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$Mult=d(+Q) with |d=-0.05~{I12} (1971Ba54). Placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 
MR -0.05 {I12} (1971Ba54) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 0.0030~{I6} given in 1993Ka30 is probably a misprint. the evaluator assumes that the value should be 0.030~{I6} and includes it in the weighted average 
M$Ice(K)(1608|g in Sm + 1606|g in Gd) from 1967La13 is consistent only with mult=E1 for one transition and mult=E2 for the other. placement of the 1604|g in Gd, from 2+ to 0+ requires mult=E2. this then establishes mult(1608|g)=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 0.0056~{I4} given in 1990Me15 is probably a misprint. the evaluator assumes that the value should be 0.056~{I4} and includes it in the weighted average 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$E is from the level energy difference and I|g is the limit from 1971Ba63. 2007Ku20 report I|g<0.09. 1990St02 report E|g=239.47~{I33} with I|g=0.04~{I1}, 1972Bb05 report E|g=238.8~{I10} with I|g=0.25~{I12}, from |g|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04 
E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990Me15. The value of 683.70~{I9} from 2004Ca04 appears to be discrepant. E|g=683.29~{I3} is expected from Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990Me15. The value of 727.42~{I16} reported by 1990St02 appears to be discrepant 
RI$From 2007Ku20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00072~{I5} (1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.000905 (M1), 0.000691 (E2). |a(K)exp allows some M1; however, placement in the decay scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$B(M1)=0.038 |m{-N}{+2} {I8}, B(E2) |< 2.8 e{+2}fm{+4} (2021Id01) for |d=0.0 
RI$reported as 23 {I+5-4} in 2021Id01 
MR$other: -3.56 {I+124-351} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$B(M1)=0.033 |m{-N}{+2} {I10}, B(E2)=6.0 e{+2}fm{+4} {I+85-38} (2021Id01) for |d=-0.32 
RI$reported as 36.4 {I+40-35} in 2021Id01 
MR$other: -1.49 {I+46-42} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$B(E1)=1.8|*10{+-3} e{+2}fm{+2} {I+6-7}, B(M2)=124 |m{-N}{+2}fm{+2} {I+512-124} (2021Id01) 
RI$reported as 209 {I+19-18} in 2021Id01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$B(M1)=0.050 |m{-N}{+2} {I+20-12}, B(E2)=54 e{+2}fm{+4} {I+19-25} (2021Id01) 
RI$reported as 52.3 {I+35-33} in 2021Id01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Theoretical K-shell conversion coefficient=0.00779 {I11} from BrIcc 
CC$theoretical value from BrIcc code 
$In Table 1 of 2014Sm02, 562.98|g listed as 2{++}{-2} to 4{++}{-1} transition seems a misprint; it should be 0{++}{-2} to 2{++}{-1}, according to level scheme in ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.056 {I14} (2014Sm02). Other value: 0.069 {I6} (1999Wo07: review article). K-shell coefficients used were 0.0078 {I1} for 562.98|g (theory from BrIcc code), and 0.0359 {I13} for 688.67|g from ENSDF database 
MR$value corresponds to |d{-|g}(E2/M1). 
CC$taken from Adopted Gammas for {+152}Sm in ENSDF database. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From {+152}Sm(n,|g); others: 39 {I9} from {+153}Sm IT decay and 21 {I2} from {+153}Pm |b- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI From {+152}Sm(n,|g); other: 1.0 {I3} from {+153}Pm |b- decay. 
M,MR From intensity balances and TAGS data (1995Gr19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI From {+152}Sm(n,|g). Other: 25.7 {I21} from {+153}Pm |b- decay. 
M (E2,M1) from conversion data; M1 ruled out from placement in level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 539.2 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 539.5 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 6.0 {I17} from (n,|g) E=th and 9.7 {I19} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 622.71 {I8} from {+153}Pm |b{+-} decay, 622.76 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 622.9 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 67.3 {I42} from {+153}Pm |b{+-} decay, 78.0 {I55} from (n,|g) E=th, and 73.4 {I64} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 630.24 {I8} from {+153}Pm |b{+-} decay, 630.24 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 630.4 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I54} from {+153}Pm |b{+-} decay, 100.0 {I72} from (n,|g) E=th, and 100.0 {I66} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 568.52 {I24} from (n,|g) E=th and 568.2 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 11.1 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th and 24.6 {I31} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 659.95 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th and 659.5 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I68} from (n,|g) E=th and 100.0 {I70} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 734.89 {I13} from (n,|g) E=th and 735.2 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 567.50 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th and 567.2 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 39.0 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th and 38.1 {I72} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$average scale factor in between datasets: 2.56=0.5x(2.5+2.62) from 567|g and 750|g intensity ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 749.9 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th and 750.4 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
RI$weighted average of 14.4 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th and 14.8 {I39} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3225.6 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th and 3224.9 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3371.8 {I12} from (n,|g) E=th and 3371.3 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3934.6 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th and 3934.9 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3943.5 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th and 3942.6 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4310.6 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th and 4311.0 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4341.4 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th and 4340.9 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4231.32, 11.6 {I11} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4468.3 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th and 4467.6 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4474.4 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th and 4475.7 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4505.6 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 4507.4 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4507.41, 17.3 {I11} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4524.3 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th and 4525.4 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4525.29, 2.4 {I9} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4545.7 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 4546.2 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4546.22, 10.9 {I7} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4644.6 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th and 4645.1 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4544.06, 3.3 {I6} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4697.2 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th and 4697.4 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4597.23, 22.2 {I9} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4757.9 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th and 4757.4 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4758.62, 6.8 {I7} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4884.0 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th and 4884.6 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4884.29, 32.5 {I13} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4951.5 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th and 4951.5 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$4951.26, 9.9 {I4} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5117.8 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th and 5118.3 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$5117.67, 27.6 {I11} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5133.3 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th and 5133.2 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5172.7 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 5172.7 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$5172.19, 23.7 {I13} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5237.8 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 5238.0 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th: two |g cascade 
E,RI$5237.24, 24.6 {I3} from (n,|g) E=2 keV:arc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Calculated from |g energy differences in {+152}Sm(n,|g). This transition was not observed directly, but its existence was inferred (1969Sm04) from L x ray intensities. 
RI$Chosen to give approximately equal |b- feeding of levels at 0 and 7.5 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC The |g energy is too low for internal conversion in the L{-1} subshell, but it is allowed in the L{-2} and L{-3} subshells. From |a(M) and the evaluator's estimated of |a(L) and |a(N+..), |a(M1) |? 2|*10{+2} and |a(E2) |? 4|*10{+5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
CC From calculated |a(L) and |a(M) and estimated |a(N+..), |a(M1) |? 143 and |a(E2) |? 3.9|*10{+4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Conversion electrons corresponding to 1099|g found only by 2009WiZU (Coul. ex.) 
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.096 {I42} (2009WiZU) 2022Ki03 evaluation results for E0, 1099.3 transition and E2, 1017.2|g: |r{+2}(E0){-exp}|=0.110 {I40}, q{+2}{-K}=2.3 {I8}, X(E0/E2)=0.31 {I10} for T{-1/2}=0.90 ps {I21} 
TI$see corresponding comment in Coul. Ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
CC$DO NOT DELETE 0.0052 32 - NOT FROM BrIcc BUT BY EVALUATOR (NN) 
CC$|a(M1+E2)=0.00206 {I4} 
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I19} from (n,n'|g) and 100.0 {I19} from Coulomb excitation 
MR$from 2012Mo23, with the other value, |d=-0.48 {I2}, rejected by 2012Mo23 due to the Alaga rule. Others: |d=+56~{I+130-25} or |d=-42 {I2} in (n,n'|g), 2006De19 
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}|<0.0094 {I15} (2014Sm02, Coul. Ex.) using |a(K)=0.00257 {I4} for 911|g (theory from BrIcc code), and |a(K)exp|<0.0067 {I6} for 1096|g from current experiment. Other value: <0.0063 (2009WiZU). 2022Ki03 evaluation results: |r{+2}(E0){-exp}|<0.009, q{+2}{-K}|<3.1, X(E0/E2)|<0.45, |a(K)exp|<0.0067 {I6} , |d=-30 {I21}, T{-1/2}|>2.4 ps 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.72 {I9} is for |d=-30 {I21}. The other calculated value, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.15 {I2} for |d=-0.48 {I2}, is rejected by 2012Mo23 from Alaga Rule 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 65.8 {I14} from (n,n'|g) and 64.0 {I19} from Coulomb excitation. Other value: 74 {I4} (|b{+-} decay (1.73 m)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$20.7 {I18} from Coulomb excitation. Other value: 31.9 {I21} from (n,n'|g). Value from Coulomb excitation preferred because the branching ratios (and B(E2)(W.u.)|_ values) measured by 2012Mo23 for the |g's decaying this level give consistent T{-1/2} values indicating that the branching ratio from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
CC$DO NOT DELETE 0.013 7 - NOT FROM BrIcc BUT BY EVALUATOR (NN) 
CC$|a(M1+E2)=0.00216 {I3} 
RI$weighted average of 83.7 {I28} from (n,n'|g) and 80 {I6} from Coulomb excitation 
MR$from 2006De19 in (n,n'|g), which also report |d=-1.1~{I3}. 
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.0082 {I+120-82} (2014Sm02) 2022Ki03 evaluation results: |r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.012 {I9}, q{+2}{-K}=4.9 {I34}, X(E0/E2)=0.8 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.0079 {I+87-73}, |d>50, T{-1/2}=43 ps {I+10-16} (original reference not found) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$5.4 {I4} from Coulomb excitation. Other value: 8.0 {I9} from (n,n'|g). Value from Coulomb excitation preferred because the branching ratios (and B(E2)(W.u.)|_ values) measured by 2012Mo23 for the |g's decaying this level give consistent T{-1/2} values indicating that the branching ratio from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I22} from (n,n'|g) and 100.0 {I24} from Coulomb excitation 
MR$from 2012Mo23, with the other value, |d=-0.51 {I7}, rejected by 2012Mo23 due to the Alaga rule. In 2006De19, (n,n'|g), report |d=-0.59~{I3} or -8.5~{I15}. 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.2 {I3} is for |d=-19 {I10}. The other calculated value, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.65 {I6} for |d=-0.51 {I7}, is rejected by 2012Mo23 from Alaga Rule 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From (n,n'|g). In {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min), a questionable |g with E|g=958.1 {I4} is shown. 
RI$From I|g(956.9|g)/I|g(1796.8|g) in (n,n'|g) and I|g(1796.8|g). from {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min), I|g|<12, but |g is shown as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min). |g not reported by 2006De19 in (n,n'|g). 
RI$From I|g(909.7|g)/I|g(1655|g) in {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min) and I|g(1655|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(1863|g)/I|g(1024|g) in (n,n'|g) and I|g(1024|g). In {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73~min), I|g|<150. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E From (|g,|g'); |g not reported in {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73 m). 
RI Computed from I|g(3111) and I|g(3111)/I|g(3193)=0.57 {I4} (from (|g,|g')). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR From |g(|q) in (|g,|g'), mult=D+Q. Since a parity change is involved in the transition, mult is not M1+E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g not reported in (n,n'|g). Its placement from this level would require mult=M3. The evaluator regards this placement as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2006De19, in (n,n'|g), report a 214.6 {I7} |g but do not place it from this level. IT is not included it in the Adopted Gammas data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Presence of |g deduced from |g|g coincidences; E|g is from level energy difference. 
RI From intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the table of I|g values given by 1977Be05. On their scheme, I|g = 7 is given. 
M$E1 multipolarity is not consistent with J|p's of 1- to 1-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$2006De19 do not list an I|g value for this |g. From the I|g data of 1986Be52, one computes I|g(81.95)=1.08|*10{+3}~{I23} on the intensity scale of 2006De19. However, since the data of 1986Be52 were measured at 90|', while those of 2006De19 were taken at 125|', this computed value may not be realistic. 
M$From the adopted values. 2006De19 do not report a mult for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$2006De19 report |d=+56~{I+130-25} or -0.42~{I2}. From consideration of the two-proton-quasiparticle makeup of this state, 2005DeZV suggest that |d is positive. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$2006De19 also report |d=-1.1~{I3}. From consideration of the two-proton-quasiparticle makeup of this state, 2005DeZV suggest that |d is positive. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2006De19 report I|g=1.9~{I2} for the composite peak. The difference is placed from the 1815 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(528|g)/I|g(375|g) in {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min) and I|g(375|g). 2006De19, in (n,n'|g) report I|g=1.9~{I2} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(637|g)/I|g(1733|g) in {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min) and I|g(1733|g). 2006De19, in (n,n'|g), report I|g=11.9~{I5} for the composite peak, from which I|g=0.6 is deduced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Conversion electrons corresponding to 1099|g found in spectrum measured only by 2009WiZU 
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.096 {I42} (2009WiZU) 2022Ki03 evaluation results for E0, 1099.3 transition and E2, 1017.2|g: |r{+2}(E0){-exp}|=0.110 {I40}, q{+2}{-K}=2.3 {I8}, X(E0/E2)=0.31 {I10} for T{-1/2}=0.90 ps {I21} 
TI$From I(1018|g)=91.1 {I15} and |a(K)=0.00203 {I3} one can get the corresponding relative intensity of the K-shell conversion electrons Ice(K)(1018|g)=0.185 {I4}; this multiplied by q{+2}{-K} = Ice(K)(1099|g)/Ice(K)(1018|g) = 2.3 {I8} gives Ice(K)(1099|g)=0.43 {I15}. Using the ratio of the electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)/|W{-Tot}(E0) = 0.85 {I6} calculated by the code BrIcc, one finally gets Ice(K)(1099|g)=0.50 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$ Relative sign of E2 matrix element=+ (2012Mo23) 
RI$62.7 {I16} is quoted by the authors of 2012Mo23 as the I|g(911.2|g) calculated from the ratio relative to I|g(1096.0|g)=87.0, of 0.75, adopted in 2009Re14; however 62.7/87.0=0.72 with higher unc 
M$Adopted value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$MRE2M1=-30 21 (2012Mo23,2022Ki03) (not working in BrIcc & JAVA_RULER_28Feb2022 @ Mar 11, 2022) 
$MR2KE0E2<3.1 (2022Ki03) (neither this) 
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}|<0.0094 {I15} (2014Sm02) using |a(K)=0.00257 {I4} for 911|g (theory from BrIcc code), and |a(K)exp|<0.0067 {I6} for 1096|g from current experiment. Other value: <0.0063 (2009WiZU). 2022Ki03 evaluation results: |r{+2}(E0){-exp}|<0.009, q{+2}{-K}|<3.1, X(E0/E2)|<0.45, |a(K)exp|<0.0067 {I6} , |d=-30 {I21}, T{-1/2}|>2.4 ps 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.72 {I9} is for |d=-30 {I21}. The other calculated value, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.15 {I2} for |d=-0.48 {I2}, is rejected by 2012Mo23 from Alaga Rule 
$ Relative sign of E2 matrix element=- (2012Mo23) 
M$Adopted value 
MR$ from |g(|q) data (2012Mo23). The other solution of |d=-0.48 {I2} is rejected by 2012Mo23 on the basis of comparison of experimental and predicted (by Alaga rule) B(E2) ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$MRE2M1>50 (not working in BrIcc & JAVA_RULER_28Feb2022 @ Mar 11, 2022) 
$MR2KE0E2=4.9 34 (2022Ki03) (neither this) 
$|r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.0082 {I+120-82} (2014Sm02) 2022Ki03 evaluation results: |r{+2}(E0){-exp}=0.012 {I9}, q{+2}{-K}=4.9 {I34}, X(E0/E2)=0.8 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.0079 {I+87-73}, |d>50, T{-1/2}=43 ps {I+10-16} (original reference not found) 
M,MR$Adopted value 
$ Relative sign of E2 matrix element=- (2012Mo23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.2 {I3} is for |d=-19 {I10}. The other calculated value, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.65 {I6} for |d=-0.51 {I7}, is rejected by 2012Mo23 from Alaga Rule 
$ Relative sign of E2 matrix element=+ (2012Mo23) 
M$Adopted value 
MR$ from |g(|q) data. Other solution of |d=-0.51 {I7} is rejected on the basis of comparison of experimental and predicted (by Alaga rule) B(E2) ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
CC the authors give |a(K)exp<0.04. The evaluator has assumed that this is a misprint (otherwise, the mult could not be uniquely established) and that the correct entry should have been <0.004. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<0.009 allows E1 or E2. Level scheme rules out E2. Note: the authors give |a(K)exp<0.09, but the evaluator has assumed that this is a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$Value from 1990He11, {+156}Pm |b{+-} decay. From {+252}Cf SF decay, 1995Zh15 report I|g=152, while 1998Ga12 report I|g=87. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1990He11 report this uncertainty as 0.1. However, this seems unusually small. The evaluator has assumed that it is a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$As assigned by 1990He11. The ce data are also consistent with mult=E1+M2, with %M2 between 8 and 9. However, from RUL, |d(M2/E1)|<0.01. Thus, there is no parity change involved in the 117.42 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$2014Wa53 seem to take this value from 1995Zh15, figured like intense in the level scheme drawing (Fig. 3 therein) and for which the evaluator assume 0.1 keV uncertainty 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Reduced hindrance f{-|n}=487 {I38} (2014Pa55), assuming the the 349-keV transition feeds the K|p=2+, |g-vibrational band (|n=3). Reduced hindrance f{-|n}=[T{-1/2}{+|g}(exp)/T{-1/2}{+|g}(Weisskopf)]{+1/|n}, where |n=|DK-|l, |l=multipole order 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$estimated by evaluators from rotational band systematics of nuclei in this mass region 
TI$from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Reduced hindrance f{-|n}=487 {I38} (2014Pa55), assuming the the 349-keV transition feeds the |g band with |n=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 105.2 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 105.0 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 167.1 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 167.0 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 273.2 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 273.3 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 262.1 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 262.2 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 535.3 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 535.3 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 
RI$44.3 from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 362.3 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 362.7 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 624.4 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 624.7 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 
RI$56.5 from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 320.2 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 320.4 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 
RI$8.9 from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 682.5 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 682.6 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 427.2 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 427.7 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 
RI$54.0 from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 747.4 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 747.4 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 
RI$100 from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 382.1 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 382.4 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 
RI$<45 from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 809.3 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2np|g) and 809.1 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor-fit; uncertainty was increased to |DE|g=0.6 keV in the fitting procedure. Level-energy difference=433.40 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=0.9 {I1} at 134|', 0.8 {I1} at 158|', values for the 440.5 doublet (1994Pa14) 
M$from the coincidence with the 273.3 M1+E2 |g, it is possible to assign a (E2) value instead of a (M1+E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g is Weighted av. (external) from {+139}Gd |b{++} decay (5.8 s) and {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,3p|g). E|g=117.2 {I1} in {+92}Mo({+54}Fe,5p2n|g) (2011Cu01) seems discrepant, too high by |?1 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from literature (1995Va22), but note that it is M1/E2 in 1995Va22 
$Observation of this |g in the delayed spectrum suggests a connecting transition between the 148-keV isomer and 117-keV level. There is no evidence of a 30-keV transition in recoil-decay tagged |g spectrum. There could be a link through a 5-keV transition from the 122-keV level to 117-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d(E2/M1)>0.85, 2011Cu01 assign E2 without any further arguments. Evaluators treat this assignment as tentative 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Hindered E1 transition is probably due to difference in nuclear shape between the isomeric |pg{-7/2} state and |ph{-11/2} ground state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|g placement from ({+54}Fe,n5p|g) (2006Ta08), also measured in {+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g) (2002Cu05) 
M$|a(exp) limits in ({+54}Fe,n5p|g) (2006Ta08; E2 not excluded); {+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g): (E1) from different parent level (2002Cu05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|g placement and mult from ({+54}Fe,n5p|g) (2006Ta08); also measured in {+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g)-2002Cu05 ((E1), from different parent level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|g ray from ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25), while unplaced in {+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g) (2002Cu05) 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$75; both I(292.9|g) and I(484.5|g) are lower limits in ({+51}V,2pn|g); the branchings listed here are calculated from these limits 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$100; both I(292.9|g) and I(484.5|g) are lower limits in ({+51}V,2pn|g); the branchings listed here are calculated from these limits 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) propose this unobserved transition based upon possible (646.8|g)(386.1|g) coincidence. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$average of the values in ({+51}V,2pn|g) and {+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g) 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$64; both I(601.7|g) and I(709.4|g) are lower limits in ({+51}V,2pn|g); the branchings listed here are calculated from these limits 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$100; both I(601.7|g) and I(709.4|g) are lower limits in ({+51}V,2pn|g); the branchings listed here are calculated from these limits 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$42; both I(821.0|g) and I(832.3|g) are lower limits in ({+51}V,2pn|g); the branchings listed here are calculated from these limits 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$100; both I(821.0|g) and I(832.3|g) are lower limits in ({+51}V,2pn|g); the branchings listed here are calculated from these limits 
M$deduced in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$646.8+647.7 form a doublet structure 
M$deduced in {+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g) (2002Cu05); confirmed in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g deduced by 1991Fi03 based on estimated B(E3) of transition feeding the 174.6 level that substantially exceeds 1 W.u., contrary to expectations based on systematics of E3; this indicates that most of the observed intensity of 174.6|g is due to a 10.7-keV, M1 transition (not observed) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from measured K x ray minus contribution from electronic conversion of 174.6|g; deduced |a(K)exp matches E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
%I|g=11.9 {I24}, using the calculated normalization. 
Mult: |a(K)exp=0.34 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.053 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.1 {I3}, using the calculated normalization. 
E,RI,M$from Fig. 13 - decay scheme (1991Fi03). Uncertainties assumed by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
%I|g=11.0 {I19}, using the calculated normalization. 
RI 41 {I12} in 1988Tu05 (I|g=38 if I|g(174.8|g)=100) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$2003He25 propose this unobserved transition based upon the possible (646.8|g)(386.1|g) coincidence. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g deduced by 1991Fi03 based on estimated B(E3)|_ of transition feeding the 174.6 level that substantially exceeds 1 W.u., contrary to expectations based on systematics of E3; this indicates that most of the observed intensity of 174.6|g is due to a 10.7-keV, M1 transition (not observed) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7}; DCO=2.03 {I24}; |DJ=(0) 
Placement not adopted from this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5}; DCO=1.7 {I7} for 309.4|g({+141}Eu)+ 309.5|g({+141}Sm)+310.2|g({+142}Gd) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.36 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I10}; DCO=1.02 {I15} for 899.1|g({+141}Eu)+ 899|g (unknown origin) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.06 {I1}. Compiler obtains 0.051 {I+7-5} by using 84% branching for 1249.7 transition (from {+143}Eu Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database), it appears that 2015Ra12 did not correct for the branching ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.23 {I3} (1984RuZW), balance of I(|g+ce) for 2912 level 
RI from 1984RuZW (renormalized to I(386|g)=650 (1979Ha48)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.76 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1979Ha48). Others: A{-2}=-0.50 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} (1984RuZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.37 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1979Ha48). Others: A{-2}=-0.42 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7} (1984RuZW) 
RI not very reliable because of admixture of {+145}Gd |g-lines 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI from 1979Ha48. Other: 98 {I7} (1984RuZW) 
M A{-2}=-0.37 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I10} (1979Ha48). Others: A{-2}=-0.30 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I10} (1984RuZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
RI$normalized line in {+147}Sm(|a,p4n|g) dataset, |DI|g=15 adopted by the evaluators based on experimental data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
ECC$ce(K)=204 {i12} (1978Ma47); ce(K)=102 {i5}, ce(L1)=13, ce(L2)=0.95 {i15}, ce(L3)=0.26 {i8} (1973Ga26); 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3+:N:O+=100.0 {i35}:13.6 {i5}:1.00 {i15}:<0.3:2.9 {i4}:0.32 {i16}:<0.2:0.80 {i11}:0.18 {i8} (1970An18) 
CC$|a(K):|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3):|a(M1):|a(M2):|a(M3)+:|a(N):(|a(O)+|a(P)) \=100.0 {I14}:13.05 {I18}:1.025 {I16}:0.1918 {I60}:2.805 {I40}:0.2474 {I40}:0.0472 {I40}:0.707 {I12}:0.1233 {I17} from exp. subshell ratios 
MR$from 1973Ga26. |d<0.01 (1963Bo44). |d=0.000 {I8} from exp. subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
ECC$ce(K)=208 {i12} (1978Ma47); ce(K)=104 {i4}, ce(L1)=13.8 {i4}, ce(L2)=1.1 {i1}, ce(L3)=0.18 {i2} (1973Ga26); 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3+:N:O+P=102.2 {i35}:13.6 {i4}:1.02 {i15}:0.10 {i6}:3.0 {i4}:0.27 {i14}:<0.1:0.77 {i9}:0.16 {i8} (1970An18) 
CC$|a(K):|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3):|a(M1):|a(M2):|a(M3)+:|a(N):(|a(O)+|a(P)) \=100.0 {i14}:13.03 {i18}: 1.071 {i22}:0.204 {i17}:2.794 {i40}:0.2406 {i50}:0.0501 {i40}:0.708 {i10}:0.1233 {i17} from exp. subshell ratios 
MR$from 1973Ga26. |d<0.01 (1963Bo44). |d=0.0000 {I25} from exp. subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1976Se02; not observed by 1981Ka07. E|g=230.2 {I5}, I|g|?0.02 (1978Ma47). 
RI$from 1976Se02, normalized to 1981Ka07 by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$|DI|g is not specified by the authors of 1981Ka07, the evaluators assumed |DI|g=1 by analogy with the data for other transitions 
ECC$ce(K)=100 (1978Ma47); ce(K)=50 {i3}, ce(L1)=6.5 {i5}, ce(L2)=0.50 {i7}, ce(L3)=0.085 {i20} (1973Ga26); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3+:N:O+P=50.7 {i30}:6.78 {i20}:0.54 {i9}:<0.1:1.44 {i15}:0.15 {i8}:<0.1:0.42 {i8}:<0.1 (1970An18) 
CC$|a(K):|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3):|a(M1):|a(M2):|a(M3)+:|a(N):(|a(O)+|a(P)) \=100.0 {i14}:13.02 {i18}:1.04 {i30}:0.206 {i30}:2.789 {i40}:0.2444 {i80}:0.0507 {i70}:0.708 {i10}:0.1230 {I17} from exp. subshell ratios 
MR$from 1973Ga26. -0.041<|d<-0.018 (1963Bo44). |d=0.08 {I15} from exp. subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$for the doublet: the second transition from 647.6 keV level, its total intensity is approximately three times less according to fig. 2 of 1980Er04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$doublet, the second transition from 647.6 keV level, energy difference between members is <0.2 keV (1980Er04) 
CC$for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$for doublet line 
E$doublet with 274.8|g, I|g=32 {I16} from 647.5 keV level 
$A{-2}=-0.040 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$for doublet line 
E$doublet with 358.2|g, I|g=75 {I18} from 647.5 keV level. A{-2}=-0.039 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$for doublet line 
E$doublet with 274.76|g, I|g=170 {I16} from 289.3 keV level. A{-2}=-0.040 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$for doublet line 
E$doublet with 358.2|g, I|g=36 {I18} from 372.7 keV level. A{-2}=-0.039 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
TI$deduced by compiler from I(|g+ce)(275.0+358.2, both from 6- to 5- levels) 
$|a(total)(exp) deduced from I(|g+ce) and I|g in 1988Er02 (compiler). 2022Ze02 give 74 {I26} 
M,MR$from deduced |a(total)(exp). Other: <0.035 (2022Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains |d(E2/M1)<0.50 for 275.0 doublet; <0.55 in 2022Ze02 
$Compiler obtains B(M1)(W.u.)>0.17 using T{-1/2}<5.55 ps 
RI$from |g|g-coin. Other: I|g=170 {I16} (1988Er02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)(56.3|g)=I(|g+ce)(316|g)=2.48 {I22}. Using I|g(56|g)=0.23 {I2}, compiler obtains |a=(2.48 {I22}/0.23 {I2})-1=9.7 {I13}, from which mult=M1(+E2),|d<0.35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$80.9 {I146} from |g|g-coin (2022Ze02). Other: I|g=36 {I18} (1988Er02) 
$Compiler obtains B(M1)(W.u.)=0.016 {+3-2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains |d(E2/M1)<0.50 for 275.0 doublet 
RI$from |g|g-coin (2022Ze02). Other: I|g=32 {I16} (1988Er02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
M$assumed assignment (compiler) 
TI$deduced by compiler from I(|g+ce)(358|g+275|g), both from 7- level to 6- levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR +0.13 {I2} from (396|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.016 {I8} (1971Va37); +0.10 {I4} from (766|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.022 {I13} (1971Va37); +0.14 {I5} from (1131|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.009 {I14} (1971Va37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.13 {I2} from (396|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.016 {I8} (1971Va37); +0.10 {I4} from (766|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.022 {I13} (1971Va37); +0.14 {I5} from (1131|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.009 {I14} (1971Va37) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=100:14.2:|<1.8:|<0.23 (1966Av02) 
EKC$other: 0.16 {I2} (1958Ad38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from (370|g)(396|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I2} (1970Kl07) |d<0.20 from |a(K)exp (1966Av02) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=100:17:|<2.6:|<0.4 (1966Av02) 
EKC$other: |a(K)exp=0.051 {I10} (1958Ad38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
RI$a fraction of 0.31 {I3} for the I|g of this [M2] |g was deduced by 1977Gr23 from |a(K)exp(995|g doublet) and used by evaluator to extract the (here) adopted I|g value from I|g(996|g doublet)=11.8 {I7} 
$|a(K)exp=0.00350 {I25} for 996|g doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$placement changed to this level by 1980Vy01 from 1399 level (1977Gr23); 1980Vy01 report E|g=330.2 {I3}, I|g=0.38 {I6}, which corresponds to 329.7|g doublet of 1977Gr23 (the other |g placed at 1565 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$0.0018 {I9} (1977Gr23); 0.0.0022 {I9} (1980Vy01) 
M$M1,E2 based on |a(K)exp (1977Gr23 and 1980Vy01); the evaluator adopts E2 from J arguments (see Adopted Levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0011 {I3} (1977Gr23), |a(K)exp=0.0011 {I5} (1980Vy01) 
M$E1,E2 based on |a(K)exp (1977Gr23); the evaluator adopted E2 based on J arguments (see Adopted Levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
EKC$0.055 {I3} (1977Gr23); 0.061 {I4} (1980Vy01) 
$K:L1:L2:L3 = 100:11:|<1.4:|<0.6 (1966Av02) 
MR |d|<0.35 (L2/L3 in 1966Av02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$a fraction of 0.31 {I3} for the I|g of the [M2] component of the 995|g doublet was deduced by 1977Gr23 from |a(K)exp(995|g doublet) and used by evaluator to extract the (here) adopted I|g value of this |g from I|g(996|g doublet)=11.8 {I7} 
$|a(K)exp=0.00350 {I25} for 996|g doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0013 {I4} (1980Vy01) corresponds to the 1566|g doublet 
M$M1,E2 suggested by 1980Vy01 based on |a(K)exp(1566|g doublet) is not adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0043 (1980Vy01) 
M$E2 based on |a(K)exp. This value is not adopted since contradicts |D|p=yes (see Adopted Levels). It seems that 1980Vy01 list |a(K) value (the only one in their |a(K)exp data with no uncertainty). 1977Gr23 give no |a(K)exp for this |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I16} (1980Vy01) 
M$(E1) based on |a(K)exp in 1980Vy01. This value is not adopted since contradicts |D|p=no (see Adopted Levels). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0059 {I18} (1980Vy01) 
M$M2,E3 based on |a(K)exp is not supported by level scheme arguments (no |p change); next possible assignment is (M1) (|a(K)(M1) slightly out the range of |a(K)exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$M2,E3 based on |a(K)exp is not supported by level scheme arguments (no |p change); next possible assignment is (M1) (|a(K)(M1) slightly out of the range of |a(K)exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A2,A4$in agreement with theoretical coefs. (A{-2}(max)=0.413, A{-4}(max)=-0.175) if |s/J is taken to be 0.30 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M$D(+Q), |DJ=0 (from A{-2},A{-4}); M1+E2 from 1977Fl09 not adopted because |D|p=yes (Adopted Levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
MR |d=+0.05 {I14} if J(initial)=29/2, 0.09 {I12} for J=25/2 
M$D, E1 (1977Fl09) not adopted because |D|p=no (Adopted Levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 (from A{-2},A{-4}); E1(+M2) from 1977Fl09 not adopted because |D|p=no (Adopted Levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.007 {I2}; this value has been corrected for a 2% contribution of the 396 keV M2 transition in {+147}Eu. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.3 {I5} (normalized to |a(K)exp(233|g)), compatible with |a(K)exp; E4 was ruled out by T{-1/2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ce data in {+149}Gd |e, |d(E2/M1)>1.3. From |g(|q) in (p,4n|g) mult=Q 
RI$others: 45 {I1} in (d,2n|g), 87 {I25} in ({+13}C,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$from (d,2n|g) and (d,3n|g). I|g=77 {I18} in ({+13}C,3n|g); 59 {I5} (p,2n|g) seem too high. This |g is not reported in |e decay, probably because it is too weak to be detected 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from (d,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 25.0 {I94} from ({+13}C,3n|g), 28.9 {I11} from (d,2n|g), 17.6 {I44} from (p,2n|g), and 22.4 {I78} from (p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (d,2n|g). Others: I|g=100 {I13} in ({+13}C,3n|g), 100 {I7} in (p,2n|g), 100 {I10} in (p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 614.9 {I2} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), 615.05 {I8} from (d,2n|g), 615.50 {I15} from (d,3n|g), and 615.4 {I2} from (p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 725.1 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), 725.9 {I2} from (d,2n|g), and 725.6 {I3} from (p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=149.72 {I1} (2006Ri11), 149.736 {I3} (1990Me15), 149.740 {I14} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=100.0 {I6} (2006Ri11), 100.0 {I7} (1990Me15), 100.0 {I19} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=100 {I3}, Ice(L1)=12.3 {I6}, Ice(L2)=1.24 {I13}, Ice(L3)=0.32 {I13}, Ice(M1)=3.5 {I5}, Ice(M)=4.7 {I10}, Ice(N)=0.91 {I30} 
MR$from L1:L2:L3=12.2 {I6}:1.24 {I13}:0.32 {I12} (1966Av05,1966Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=459.84 {I2} (2006Ri11), 459.812 {I4} (1990Me15), 459.821 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=1.224 {I22} (2006Ri11), 1.199 {I10} (1990Me15), 1.222 {I17} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.060 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
$E|g=346.66 {I3} (2006Ri11), 346.651 {I3} (1990Me15), 346.648 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=49.8 {I5} (2006Ri11), 48.80 {I15} (1990Me15), 49.1 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
M$from L1:L2:L3=3.2 {I3}:0.21 {I4}:0.016 {I7} (1966Av05) 
$Ice(K)=19.9 {I6}, Ice(L1)=3.0 {I3}, Ice(L2)=0.21 {I4}, Ice(L3)=0.016 {I7}, Ice(M1)=0.7 {I2} 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1987Be33). Other: -0.08 {I+11-5} (1986Va16). ce data consistent with pure M2 
$(347|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.009 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.011 {I23} (1962Pr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$E|g=496.41 {I2} (2006Ri11), 496.383 {I2} (1990Me15), 496.380 {I7} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=3.35 {I6} (2006Ri11), 3.431 {I15} (1990Me15), 3.41 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
M$from L1:L2:L3=0.024 {I4}:0.024 {I6}:0.0051 {I25} (1966Av05) 
$Ice(K)=0.188 {I10}, Ice(L1)=0.024 {I4}, Ice(L2)=0.024 {I6}, Ice(L3)=0.0051 {I25}, Ice(M1)=0.012 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=384.54 {I2} (2006Ri11), 384.52 {I2} (1990Me15), 384.545 {I12} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.154 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.157 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.160 {I4} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=534.31 {I2} (2006Ri11), 534.296 {I4} (1990Me15), 534.288 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=6.49 {I12} (2006Ri11), 6.41 {I5} (1990Me15), 6.5 {I1} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.224 {I12}, Ice(L1)=0.027 {I7}, Ice(M1)=0.006 {I2}, (Ice(L)=0.020 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=132.00 {I1} (2006Ri11), 132.001 {I9} (1990Me15), 132.06 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.187 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.186 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.147 {I8} (1987Ad02, seems discrepant, not used in averaging) 
$Ice(K)=0.27 {I2}, Ice(L1)=0.05 {I2}, (Ice(L)=0.11 {I3} 
$(132|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I12} (1975Se18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=516.57 {I2} (2006Ri11), 516.545 {I2} (1990Me15), 516.549 {I7} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=5.58 {I10} (2006Ri11), 5.53 {I10} (1990Me15), 5.60 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
RI$6.28 {I6} (1975Al14) is not used in averaging 
$Ice(K)=0.170 {I5}, Ice(L1)=0.028 {I7}, Ice(M1)=0.007 {I2}, (Ice(L)=0.020 {I4} 
$(516|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.120 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.024 {I25} (1975Se18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=666.29 {I1} (2006Ri11), 666.290 {I4} (1990Me15), 666.286 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=1.853 {I22} (2006Ri11), 1.801 {I10} (1990Me15), 1.822 {I28} (1987Ad02) 
M,MR$from ce data |d(E2/M1)>1.3; from |g(|q) in (p,4n|g) mult=Q 
$Ice(K)=0.022 {I3}, Ice(L1)=0.003 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2006Ri11 
E$others: 82.50 {I15} (1975Al14), 83.01 (1996Vy02) 
RI$others: 0.065 {I15} (1975Al14), 0.06 {I2} (1992Ca11), 0.11 {I1} (1996Vy02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=214.28 {I2} (2006Ri11), 214.28 (1990Me15), 214.268 {I13} (1987Ad02). Uncertainty of 0.015 keV assumed in 1990Me15 
$I|g=0.409 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.387 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.409 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp 
$Ice(K)=0.074 {I38} 
$(214|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I10} (1975Se18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=252.19 {I2} (2006Ri11), 252.222 {I4} (1990Me15), 252.203 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.563 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.538 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.580 {I11} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
M$|d(E2/M1)=2.5 {I+33-8} from |a(K)exp, but |DJ|p requires E2 
$Ice(K)=0.095 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=598.84 {I4} (2006Ri11), 598.94 {I4} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.047 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.0400 {I21} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=748.62 {I2} (2006Ri11), 748.601 {I2} (1990Me15), 748.603 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=17.19 {I20} (2006Ri11), 16.94 {I26} (1990Me15), 17.08 {I27} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.1 
$Ice(K)=0.051 {I7} 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1986Va16). Others: +0.034 {I21} (quoted by 1986Va16 from another work), 1987Kr11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=776.59 {I5} (2006Ri11), 776.78 {I4} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$I|g=0.033 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0298 {I14} (1987Ad02). Other: 0.035 {I7} (1996Vy02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=128.74 {I2} (2006Ri11), 128.75 {I3} (1990Me15), 128.77 {I11} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.081 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.078 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.069 {I7} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.039 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=260.73 {I3} (2006Ri11), 260.737 {I6} (1990Me15), 260.735 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=2.69 {I5} (2006Ri11), 2.687 {I29} (1990Me15), 2.69 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.05 
$Ice(K)=0.099 {I6} 
$(261|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.110 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I5} (1975Se18) 
$|g(|q,t): 1987Kr11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=298.63 {I1} (2006Ri11), 298.634 {I5} (1990Me15), 298.634 {I10} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=57.9 {I6} (2006Ri11), 57.66 {I24} (1990Me15), 57.9 {I10} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=8.6 {I3}, Ice(L1)=1.13 {I11}, Ice(L2)=0.073 {I18}, Ice(L3)|<0.015 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1987Be33). Others: +0.15 {I3} (1986Va16), +0.11 {I3} (quoted by 1986Va16 from another work). Combining experimental |a values above and L1:L2:L3=1.13 {I11}:0.073 {I18}:0.015 gives |d<0.35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=645.31 {I1} (2006Ri11), 645.315 {I2} (1990Me15), 645.309 {I7} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=3.12 {I4} (2006Ri11), 3.035 {I15} (1990Me15), 3.02 {I4} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.12 
$Ice(K)=0.014 {I2} 
$(645|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1975Se18) 
$|g(|q,t) data: 1987Kr11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g reported only by 1975Al14 and 1996Vy02. Interpreted by 2006Ri11 as a sum line, an upper limit set 
$I|g=0.028 {I12} (1996Vy02), 0.056 {I19} (1975Al14) 
E$794.7 {I3} in 1975Al14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=264.60 {I4} (2006Ri11), 264.63 {I3} (1990Me15), 264.72 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.081 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.064 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.095 {I3} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$|a(K)exp marginally agrees with M1 
$Ice(K)=0.035 {I10} 
$Placement from 1013 level in 1975Al14 is not supported by 1987Ad02 and 2006Ri11, and from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=649.15 {I7} (2006Ri11), 649.06 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.033 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.0223 {I16} (1987Ad02); unweighted average 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=798.90 {I2} (2006Ri11), 798.94 {I2} (1990Me15), 798.90 {I2} (1987Ad02). 
$I|g=0.108 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.093 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.104 {I3} (1987Ad02). Other: 0.090 {I5} (1996Vy02) 
M$(M2) from 1996Vy02 proposed by 1996Vy02 for 798.9|g is inconsistent with positive parity for the 798 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=278.34 {I2} (2006Ri11), 278.28 {I2} (1990Me15) 
$I|g=0.185 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.143 {I3} (1990Me15): unweighted average 
$(278|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.160 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.035 {I30} (1975Se18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=352.79 {I5} (2006Ri11), 352.81 {I2} (1990Me15), 352.72 {I9} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.074 {I9} (2006Ri11), 0.088 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.088 {I6} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=662.91 {I1} (2006Ri11), 662.89 {I1} (1990Me15), 662.905 {I10} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.568 {I10} (2006Ri11), 0.578 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.594 {I11} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.013 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=812.62 {I2} (2006Ri11), 812.64 {I3} (1990Me15), 812.632 {I10} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.305 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.303 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.305 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.0039 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=341.66 {I5} (2006Ri11), 341.65 {I6} (1990Me15), 341.65 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.136 {I17} (2006Ri11), 0.157 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.167 {I11} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=416.09 {I4} (2006Ri11), 416.04 {I3} (1990Me15), 416.11 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.048 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.045 {I4} (1990Me15), 0.0493 {I15} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=726.23 {I2} (2006Ri11), 726.16 {I4} (1990Me15), 726.21 {I1} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.168 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.166 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.162 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.0033 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=875.95 {I2} (2006Ri11), 875.83 {I1} (1990Me15), 875.943 {I10} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$I|g=0.320 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.313 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.312 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.0036 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=761.10 {I3} (2006Ri11), 761.22 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.017 {I1} (2006Ri11), 0.0156 {I19} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=138.10 {I1} (2006Ri11), 138.09 {I2} (1990Me15), 138.28 {I4} (1987Ad02). Value from 1987Ad02 not used in averaging 
$I|g=0.141 {I8} (2006Ri11), 0.171 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.181 {I7} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I6} (using weighted average of Ice(K) values). |a(K)exp=0.24 {I6} gives E1+M2 while 0.42 {I6} is consistent with E2. |a(L1)exp gives E2 or E1+M2 
$Ice(K)=0.086 {I27} (1975Al14), 0.17 {I2} (1992Ca11), 0.20 {I3} (1966Ha23) 0.15 {I4} (1966Av05), Ice(L1)=0.04 {I2} (1966Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=184.50 {I2} (2006Ri11), 184.51 {I1} (1990Me15), 184.52 {I2} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.108 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0930 {I34} (1990Me15), 0.099 {I3} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I4} from ce(K) in 1975Al14), 0.46 {I5} (from weighted averaged ce(K)). The former value gives E2 or E1+M2, while the latter (>than that for M1) is inconsistent with either mult 
$Ice(K)=0.027 {I8} (1975Al14), 0.092 {I9} (1992Ca11), 0.08 {I2} (1966Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=266.82 {I6} (2006Ri11), 266.97 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.036 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.063 {I3} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$Ice(K)|?0.02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=398.82 {I3} (2006Ri11), 398.77 {I3} (1990Me15), 398.82 {I1} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.092 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.088 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0937 {I23} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved doublet. 
$E|g=436.62 {I17} (2006Ri11). Others: 436.36 {I2} (1990Me15), 436.37 {I1} (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet 
$I|g=0.043 {I6} (2006Ri11). Others: 0.132 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.132 {I3} (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=933.13 {I2} (2006Ri11), 932.925 {I6} (1990Me15), 933.134 {I14} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$I|g=1.288 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1.287 {I10} (1990Me15), 1.31 {I4} (1987Ad02) 
$|d(E2/M1)>1.4 from |a(K)exp, but |DJ|p requires E2 
$Ice(K)=0.0062 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=125.99 {I2} (2006Ri11), 125.98 {I1} (1990Me15), 125.98 {I2} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.300 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.313 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.250 {I7} (1987Ad02). Value from 1987Ad02 not used in averaging 
$|a(K)exp=0.46 {I8} (ce(K) from 1975Al14,1966Av05), 0.97 {I6} (ce(K) from 1992Ca11,1966Ha23). Mult=E2 from former and M1 from latter. 
$Ice(K)=0.21 {I4} (1966Av05), 0.26 {I6} (1975Al14), 0.59 {I9} (1966Ha23), 0.48 {I2} (1992Ca11), Ice(L1)=0.07 (1966Ha23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=272.32 {I3} (2006Ri11), 272.317 {I5} (1990Me15), 272.322 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=6.61 {I13} (2006Ri11), 6.66 {I10} (1990Me15), 6.69 {I13} (1987Ad02) 
MR$from experimental |a values above, and L1:L2:L3=0.18 {I2}:0.016 {I4}:0.0073 (1966Av05), using the BrIccMixing program. 
$Ice(K)=1.30 {I4}, Ice(L1)=0.18 {I2}, Ice(L2)=0.016 {I4}, Ice(L3)|<0.0073, Ice(M1)=0.04 {I2} 
$(272|g)(666|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.143 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.013 {I20} (1985Be64) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=404.32 {I3} (2006Ri11), 404.294 {I5} (1990Me15), 404.302 {I9} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.402 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.416 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.413 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} (ce(K) from 1975Al14), 0.032 {I12} (ce(K) from 1966Ha23) 
$Ice(K)=0.0086 {I26} (1975Al14), 0.026 {I10} (1966Ha23) 
$(404|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I10} (1975Se18) 
$(404|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.025 {I18} (1985Be64) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved doublet. 
$E|g=478.78 {I2} (2006Ri11), 478.71 {I1} (1990Me15), 478.710 {I8} (1987Ad02). 
$I|g=0.424 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.475 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.473 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.010 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=788.87 {I2} (2006Ri11), 788.878 (1990Me15), 788.873 {I8} (1987Ad02). Uncertainty assumed as 0.010 keV in 1990Me15 
$I|g=15.11 {I22} (2006Ri11), 15.12 {I15} (1990Me15), 15.32 {I26} (1987Ad02) 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1987Be33). Others: +0.43 {I6} (1987Be33 for 5/2 to 7/2 transition), >5 (from ce data). |d from |g|g(|q) data is not deduced due to large discrepancy in A{-2} values from 1985Be64 and 1975Se18 
$Ice(K)=0.106 {I7}, Ice(L1)=0.018 {I6}, (Ice(L)=0.035 {I16}, Ice(M1)=0.0045 {I15} 
$(789|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.100 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1975Se18) 
$(789|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.233 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.023 {I30} (1985Be64) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=938.63 {I3} (2006Ri11), 938.605 {I5} (1990Me15), 938.626 {I11} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=5.03 {I4} (2006Ri11), 4.97 {I6} (1990Me15), 4.95 {I10} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.034 {I4}, Ice(L1)=0.005 {I2}, (Ice(L)=0.0046 {I6}, Ice(M1)=0.0016 {I3}, Ice(M)=0.0018 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=418.35 {I4} (2006Ri11), 418.77 {I13} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$I|g=0.010 {I2} (2006Ri11), 0.0108 {I13} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=492.93 {I6} (2006Ri11), 492.81 {I7} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.034 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0385 {I25} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=802.91 {I2} (2006Ri11), 802.93 {I2} (1990Me15), 802.95 {I2} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.098 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.088 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0891 {I27} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=952.61 {I3} (2006Ri11), 952.68 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0266 {I15} (2006Ri11), 0.0220 {I9} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=992.21 {I4} (2006Ri11), 992.205 {I4} (1990Me15), 992.192 {I15} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.066 {I2} (2006Ri11), 0.0661 {I20} (1990Me15), 0.0675 {I18} (1987Ad02). Other: 0.064 {I4} (1996Vy02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved doublet. See comments for 478.78|g for data from 1990Me15 and 1987Ad02. E|g=478.29 {I6} in ce spectrum (1975Al14), but it is not clear how the authors resolved the two components of a doublet at this energy 
$Ice(K)=0.0047 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M1))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$E|g=552.76 {I2} (2006Ri11), 552.75 {I2} (1990Me15), 552.768 {I16} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.156 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.171 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.181 {I5} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>0.4 or E1+M2 with |d=0.47 {I15}; the latter value seems less probable due to significant M2 mixture 
$Ice(K)=0.0039 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=862.87 {I3} (2006Ri11), 862.86 {I3} (1990Me15), 862.861 {I12} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.135 {I2} (2006Ri11), 0.140 {I4} (1990Me15), 0.1360 {I28} (1987Ad02) 
M$|a(K)exp gives M2. But it is inconsistent with |DJ=0,1 which would favor E1 component over M2 
$Ice(K)=0.0051 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1012.61 {I4} (2006Ri11), 1012.59 {I5} (1990Me15), 1012.61 {I2} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0514 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.0465 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.0466 {I14} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=186.63 {I3} (2006Ri11), 186.729 {I53} (1990Me15), 186.75 {I7} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.024 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.0206 {I25} (1990Me15), 0.0192 {I16} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=349.12 {I10} (2006Ri11), 348.96 {I10} (1990Me15) 
$I|g=0.133 {I10} (2006Ri11), 0.20 {I5} (1990Me15) 
$Ice(K)=0.012 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=431.30 {I2} (2006Ri11), 431.294 {I12} (1990Me15), 431.298 {I12} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.145 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.142 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.147 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.3 
$Ice(K)=0.0031 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=563.58 {I25} (2006Ri11), 563.48 {I10} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.024 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.0212 {I22} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=601.21 {I3} (2006Ri11), 601.206 (1990Me15), 601.196 {I15} (1987Ad02). Uncertainty of 0.020 keV assumed in 1990Me15 
$I|g=0.126 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.122 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.1216 {I26} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp: ce(K) may be composite of 599|g and 601|g 
$Ice(K)=0.0039 {I8} (probably for both 599|g and 601|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=947.88 {I3} (2006Ri11), 947.820 {I6} (1990Me15), 947.873 {I10} (1987Ad02): unweighted average 
$I|g=1.99 {I3} (2006Ri11), 1.973 {I34} (1990Me15), 1.99 {I4} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.15 
$(948|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7} (1975Se18) 
$(948|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.063 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I9} (1985Be64) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=1097.54, I|g=0.018 {I7} in 1996Vy02. 2006Ri11 interpreted this |g ray as a sum line, and set an upper limit of 0.004 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1015.25 {I9} (2006Ri11), 1015.31 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0260 {I24} (2006Ri11), 0.0252 {I10} (1987Ad02). Other: 0.027 {I2} (1996Vy02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=673.43 {I2} (2006Ri11), 673.65 {I15} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0076 {I12} (2006Ri11), 0.0067 {I9} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1207.58 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1207.71 {I7} (1990Me15), 1207.81 {I12} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0030 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.00220 {I20} (1990Me15), 0.0024 {I2} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=421.55 {I20} (2006Ri11), 421.63 {I18} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.010 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.0071 {I11} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1220.49 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1220.64 {I12} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0020 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0016 {I1} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved doublet. 
$E|g=436.24 {I3} (2006Ri11). Others: 436.36 {I2} (1990Me15), 436.37 {I1} (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet 
$I|g=0.091 {I4} (2006Ri11). Others: 0.132 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.132 {I3} (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet 
M$|a(K)exp=0.046 {I16} for the doublet is consistent with M1 for the main placement with 1231 level 
$Ice(K)=0.012 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=482.66 {I2} (2006Ri11), 482.63 {I2} (1990Me15), 482.636 {I12} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.155 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.157 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.155 {I4} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.0066 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=734.85 {I3} (2006Ri11), 734.84 {I2} (1990Me15), 734.87 {I1} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.262 {I8} (2006Ri11), 0.274 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.261 {I6} (1987Ad02) 
$Ice(K)=0.0037 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1081.57 {I3} (2006Ri11), 1081.58 {I6} (1990Me15), 1081.58 {I3} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0356 {I27} (2006Ri11), 0.0362 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.0382 {I14} (1987Ad02) 
$|a(K)exp marginally agrees with M2 
$Ice(K)=0.0016 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1231.4 {I2} (2006Ri11), 1231.0{I2} (1990Me15) 
$I|g=0.0005 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.00073 {I20} (1990Me15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1096.79 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1096.70 {I5} (1990Me15), 1096.59 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.005 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0029 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0035 {I3} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1246.27 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1246.4 {I1} (1990Me15), 1246.41 {I8} (1987Ad02) 
$I|g=0.0046 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.00445 {I34} (1990Me15), 0.0041 {I2} (1987Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from the Adopted Gammas, most of the intensity must belong with 666 level. However, the authors attribute this |g to 1334 level only. But from the Adopted Gammas, I|g|?3 with 1334 level 
$E2 in 1977Na27 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(938|g)/I|g(789|g)=2 disagrees with 0.33 from {+149}Gd |e decay. From the published |g-ray singles spectrum it seems that the I|g(789|g)=2.7 may be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO is inconsistent with |DJ=1, dipole, while it is typical value |DJ=2, quadrupole or |DJ=0, dipole 
$E1 in 1994Ur01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$M1+E2 in 1977Fl09 
M,MR$1977Fl09 propose this as a 7/2+ to 7/2+ transition. But 1994Ur01 use this as a reference E2 transition. Note that A{-2} and A{-4} in 1977Fl09 are consistent with a stretched quadruple transition (|DJ=2), with |DJ=0 also possible but less common. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$E2 with |d(O/Q)=-0.07 {I15} for J(2495)=23/2- or 15/2-; M1+E2 with |d(E2/M1)=-0.84 {I51} for J(2495)=19/2- (1977Fl09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 169.3~{I2} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 169.3~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 17~{I7} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 24~{I6} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 226.9~{I1} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 226.9~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I10} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 100~{I5} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 144.7~{I4} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 144.7~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 1.4~{I6} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 0.40~{I10} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 201.8~{I1} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 201.8~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 1.4~{I6} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 2.0~{I5} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 314.1~{I1} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 314.1~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I5} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 100~{I5} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 371.6~{I1} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 371.6~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 65~{I4} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 62~{I3} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 171.5~{I2} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 171.5~{I1} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100~{I12} ({+152}Sm(p,3n|g)), 100~{I6} ({+136}Xe({+19}F,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$this as yet unobserved transition is inferred from the decay of the 562 state to be the major mode of decay of the 589-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 21.543~{I3} (1989Di05), 21.50~{I3} (1983Vo10), 21.540~{I6} (1974HeYW), 21.529~{I14} (1970An17), 21.54~{I2} (1970Fo02), 21.6~{I1} (1969Ho30), 21.55~{I5} (1968Gr25). Other: 21.497~{I13} (1982BaZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from B(E3)=0.0160 {I15} (Coul. ex.) and T{-1/2}=58.9 |ms {I5}. From {+151}Gd |e decay, I|g<1.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from {+151}Gd |e decay. This placement is considered uncertain by the evaluator since it is not confirmed in in-beam |g-ray studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g and I|g of |g's from 546 level from (n,n'|g). In high-spin data, 214|g is not reported and 546|g is assigned to a 1503 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from Coul. ex. only. This |g ray is considered uncertain (by evaluator) since no evidence is provided in other reactions such as (p,2n|g) (1979Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$A 325.6|g in (n,n'|g) is assigned from 522 level only. This |g can proceed to any of three levels near 307~keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Suggested placement (only by 1995Jo18 in ({+19}F,4n|g), with I|g=31~{I3}) is considered suspect (by evaluator) in view of no such assignments in other reactions where this level is populated fairly intensely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Di05. Other: 21.540~{I6} (1974HeYW). Others: 1959Ac28, 1952Wi25, 1950Sc07 
M,MR$from 'adopted gammas' 
$|a(L)exp=20~{I4}, (|a(L)exp/(|a(M)exp)+|a(N)exp)=2.2~{I4}, |a(M)exp/|a(N)exp=2.2~{I2} (1959Ac28) 
$I(K| x ray-a)/I(21.54|g)=0.0058~{I2} (1971Ca44), 0.0040~{I2} (1981Un02) 
$I(K| x ray-|b)/I(21.54|g)=0.0010~{I2} (1981Un02) 
$See 1981Un02 for intensities of L-x rays relative to 21.54|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from L- and M- subshell ce data (1981Ar17, 1970An17) 
$ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3)=12.7:1.66~{I12}:0.82~{I7} (1981Ar17), 9.9~{I9}:1.22~{I11}:0.57~{I5} (1970An17), 12.8~{I2}:1.35~{I3}:1.10~{I20} (1968Gr25). Others: 1967Gr29, 1966Ha23, 1966Av05, 1958An34, 1958Sh61 
$ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3)=2.7~{I4}:0.41~{I5}:0.20~{I5} (1981Ar17), 1.93~{I3}:0.265~{I5}:0.129~{I4} (1970An17). Others: 1958An34, 1958Sh61 
$ce(M):ce(N):ce(O+P)=2.33~{I12}:0.55~{I25}:0.18~{I4} (1970An17) others: 1968Gr25, 1966Av05, 1967Gr29, 1966Ha23 
$|a(L1)exp=22~{I2}, |a(L2)exp=2.8~{I3}, |a(L3)exp=1.4~{I2}, |a(M1)exp=4.6~{I3}, |a(M2)exp=0.7~{I1} |a(M3)exp=0.33~{I7} (average of 1981Ar17 and 1970An17) |a(N)exp=1.1~{I5}, |a(O+...)exp=0.36~{I8} (1970An17). Others: 1968Gr25, 1967Gr29, 1966Av05, 1966Ha23, 1958Sh61, 1958An34 
E$weighted average of 1983Vo10, 1982BaZX, 1970An17, 1970Fo02, 1969Ho30 and 1968Gr25. See 'adopted gammas', also 
RI$value from 1982BaZX not included in weighted average 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
ICE(K)=100, ICE(L)=20 1, ICE(M)=6.5 15 (1968Gr25) OTHERS: 1982BaZX, 1967Gr29, 1966Av05, 1966Ha23, 1958Sh61, 1958An34 
$ce(L1)/ce(L3)=21/2.5 (1966Ha23) 
M$from ce(L1)/ce(L3). See also (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1967Gr29 give Ice(K)|?0.1; however, in the published ce spectrum, not much evidence is there for the presence of a ce(K)(225|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$|a(L)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>1, |g|g(|q) gives |d=0.00~{I5} or +10~{I+10-2} (deduced by the evaluator from |g|g(|q) (1985Be64)) 
$(107|g)(243|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.053~{I17}, A{-4}=+0.013~{I9} (1985Be64) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.7~{I2}. |a(K)exp=0.043~{I3}. This value of |a(K)exp does not indicate M1 since it is less than |a(K)(E2). Low |a(K)exp must be due to contribution from 286.4|g expected to be E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.9~{I4}. |a(K)exp=0.85~{I4}, |a(L)exp=0.13~{I1}. |a(K)exp does not indicate M1 since it is less than |a(K)(E2) but |a(L)exp agrees with M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.8~{I2}. |a(K)exp=0.051~{I9}, |a(L)exp=0.015~{I7}. |a(K)exp is less than for |a(K)(E2). |a(L)exp gives M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This placement is considered suspect (by evaluator) since it is not confirmed in other reactions where this level is populated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.98~{I2}. |a(K)exp=0.011~{I2}. |a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>0.9 
INCORRECTLY LABELED IN TABLE 2 (1995Jo18) WITH 1719 LEVEL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.8~{I4}. |a(K)exp(465.9|g+466.0|g)=0.006~{I2}. |a(K)exp is consistent with E1 and E2 for the doublet or E1 for both 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(556|g) relative to 511|g and 772|g is low, as compared to results of 1993Ve04 in ({+6}Li,5n|g), by factors of|?3 and|?6, respectively. 1995Jo18 assigned part of 556|g (I|g=1.0) from 752 level, in contradiction to other studies. If all of the intensity of 556|g is assigned here, the agreement with ({+6}Li,5n|g) is better 
$DCO=1.2~{I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.5~{I7}. |a(K)exp(172.6|g+172.8|g)=0.19~{I3}. |a(K)exp and DCO ratios are consistent with M1 and E1 for the two components of the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.8~{I2}. |a(K)exp(465.9|g+466.0|g)=0.006~{I2}. |a(K)exp agrees with E2 and E1 for the two components of the doublet or E1 for both 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1993Ve04. 1995Jo18 suggest, in table 2, placement from a 2885, 29/2+ level to 2237, 25/2+ level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.6~{I4}. |a(K)exp(172.6|g+172.8|g)=0.19~{I3}. |a(K)exp and DCO ratios are consistent with M1 and E1 for the two components of the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
TI$transition is not directly observed by 1993Ve04. Intensity is inferred (1993Ve04) from I|g of |g rays from 2955 level in coincidence with gammas feeding the 3046 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$out of total I|g=44.7~{I9}, I|g=1.9~{I2} is assigned (by evaluator) to a 260|g from 503 level, based on results from Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=25.8~{I5} divided (by evaluator) using I|g(416|g)/I|g(394|g)=0.72~{I20} in 'adopted gammas' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$using adopted branching ratios from Coulomb excitation, expected I|g(293|g multiplet)=12.8~{I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$deduced from B(E2) and adopted branching ratio. This value overlaps values for J=3/2, 5/2 or 7/2 
$A{-2}=-0.042~{I11}, A{-4}=+0.012~{I13} for 196.5+195.8 doublet (1977Dr04) 1972Th09 deduce |d=-0.9~{I4} from A{-2}=-0.15~{I3}, A{-4}=-0.075~{I25}. In view of the unresolved doublet, this value of |d is suspect 
$K/L=5.5 for the doublet (1959Be68) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(286.0|g+286.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.067~{I6}, A{-4}=-0.001~{I7}. Other: 1972Th09 
$({+16}O)(286.0|g+286.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.32~{I4}, A{-4}=+0.04~{I5}. After correcting for 286.3|g, A{-2}=+0.07~{I8}, A{-4}=+0.14~{I10} which leads to |d=0.7~{I6} 
$K/L=3.6 for 286.0|g+286.3|g (1959Be68) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(307.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.025~{I4}, A{-4}=+0.008~{I5}. Other: 1972Th09 
$({+16}O)(307.5|g)(|q):A{-2}=+0.024~{I17}, A{-4}=0.00~{I2} 
MR$0.27~{I7} for J=7/2 
$K/L=6.7 (1959Be68) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$only a small fraction of the intensity may belong here. In (p,2n|g) (1979Lo06), no 579|g was reported where 579.8 level was populated fairly intensely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$out of total I|g=7.6, I|g=1.1 is assigned (by evaluator) to a 260|g from 503 level, based on results from Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on I|g(416|g)/I|g(394|g)=0.72~{I20} in 'adopted gammas' from decay of 416 level, I|g|?9 should be associated with 416 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$out of total I|g=13~{I2}, I|g=1.2~{I2} is assigned (by evaluator) to a 260|g from 503 level, based on results from Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from branching in 'adopted gammas', a substantial fraction of the intensity should be assigned from 600.2 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on I|g(416|g)/I|g(394|g)=0.72~{I20} in 'adopted gammas', I|g|?7 should be associated with 416 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.33~{I9}, A{-4}=-0.20~{I12}. Negative A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=1 indicated by negative A{-2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$38~{I11} from I|g(416|g)/I|g(394|g)=0.72~{I20} in 'adopted gammas' 
$1976Ta10 show this |g as deexciting the 416 level only, but it mainly deexcites the 612 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on I|g(416|g)/I|g(394|g)=0.72~{I20} in 'adopted gammas', I|g|?38 should be associated with 416 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$out of total I|g=2.5~{I10}, I|g=1.0~{I1} is assigned (by evaluator) to a 260|g from 503 level, based on results from Coul. ex. 
$For 260.5+261.6, A{-2}=+0.16~{I12}, A{-4}=+0.05~{I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$out of total I|g=6.6~{I7}, I|g=1.0~{I1} is assigned (by evaluator) to a 260|g from 503 level, based on results from Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas of {+151}Eu in the ENSDF database. 
RI$emission probability (2011Sh37) per 100 decays, resulting from the decay of {+151}Sm from an absolute gamma emission rate of 995 Bq/mg {I30} and {+151}Sm sample activity of 3.07|*10{+6} Bq/mg {I8}. Other: 0.0318 {I22} in {+151}Sm decay dataset in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$The weighted average of 21.5413 keV {I7} (from measured electron energy E{-e(L1)} = 13.4893 keV {I6}), 21.5415 keV {I10} (from measured electron energy E{-e(L2)} = 13.9246 keV {I9}) and 21.5412 keV {I12} (from measured electron energy E{-e(L3)} = 14.5643 keV {I11}). . 
MR$absolute value was determined from the measured intensity ratios for internal conversion electrons (L{-1}:L{-2}:L{-3} = 40.7 {I12}: :5.3 {I4}: 2.6 {I3}) and calculated internal conversion coefficients using computer code NICC without including the nuclear structure effect in 2016In02. The admixture parameter |D = 9.32|*10{+-4} {I68} was deduced using the measured |d. The analysis was performed separately with the experimental data in 2016In02 and the data in 1970Au17 and in 1981Ar17. The results of the analysis given in 2016In02 are ~||d(E2/M1)~| = 0.0301 {I9} and |D = 9.05 |*10{+-4} {I51}. Other: ~||d(E2/M1)~| = 0.0285 {I12} and |D = 8.14 |*10{+-4} {I67} including the data in 1970An17 and 1981Ar17 and the nuclear structure effect, |l=3.2 {I19} in 2016In02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$average of -3.3 {I+9-14} from DCO and -3.3 {I+13-30} from DCO and pol measurement. 
$DCO=0.44 {I7}, |D=0.038 {I35} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.54 {I9}, |D=0.024 {I15} 
MR$average of -6.2 {I+25-88} from DCO and -6.3 {I+33-88} from DCO and pol measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.68 {I10}, |D=-0.0079 {I28} 
MR$average of -0.08 {I+10-9} from DCO and -0.10 {I+2-11} from DCO and pol measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from adopted gammas. Not seen in 96-min {+152}Eu IT decay. 
RI from I|g/I|g(89.847|g)=0.0041 {I5} in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$The evaluator has increased the authors' original value of E=89.847 by 17 parts per million to correct for the change in the value of the 411 {+198}Au standard line 
M from |a(K)exp=0.30 {I5} (1965Ta03) based on (L| x ray)(K| x ray)/(L| x ray)(|g). Others: |a(K)exp|<0.31 (1963Ki18), 0.28 {I3} (1975Pr05) based on K| x ray/|g. K/L=7.2 {I10} (1965Ta03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
TI$From 100/normalization factor 
M$L1:L2:L3=2~{I2}:100:100~{I30}, L/M=2.7~{I+7-2} (1965Ta03). The subshell ratios are consistent with mult=E2 or E3. L/M(theory)=4.26 (E2), 3.82 (E3) slightly favors mult=E3. B(E2)(W.u.)=2|*10{+-10} would be unusually small, whereas B(E3)(W.u.)=0.00013 is reasonable. Mult=E3 is thus ADOPTED 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Authors' value of 5817.99 seems to be a misprint. They quote a final level energy of 489.62, which would require E|g=5816.99. this corrected energy agrees with E|g=5816.5~{I8} from 2007ChZX who also report |s =3.7~b~{I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=51 {I16}, |a(L2)exp=3.7 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=5.7 {I18}, |a(N1)exp=1.1 {I3}; theory: |a(L1)=23.9, |a(L2)=2.21, |a(M1)=5.12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp<0.47, |a(L2)exp=4.4 {I13}, |a(L3)exp=3.9 {I9}, |a(M)exp=2.0 {I3}; theory: |a(L1)=0.273, |a(L2)=3.15, |a(L3)=3.64, |a(M)=1.66 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=3.3 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.44, |a(L2)exp=0.037 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=0.0092, |a(M1)exp=0.097 {I24}, |a(N1)exp=0.032 {I5}; theory: |a(K)=3.27 {I5}, |a(L1)=0.426 {I7}, |a(L2)=0.050 {I10}, |a(L3)=0.022~{I11}, |a(M1)=0.0913~{I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp=0.35 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.26 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=0.27 {I3}, |a(M)exp=0.20 {I3}; theory: |a(L1)=0.370, |a(L2)=0.189, |a(L3)=0.272, |a(M)=0.180 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.32 {I2}, |a(L1)exp=0.030 {I2}, |a(L2)exp=0.0050 {I6}, |a(L3)exp=0.0095 {I7}, |a(M)exp=0.0084 {I7}; theory: |a(K)=0.318, |a(L1)=0.0320, |a(L2)=0.00702, |a(L3)=0.00896, |a(M)=0.0104 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from adopted gammas; |a(L1)exp=51 {I20}, |a(L2)exp=5 {I3}, |a(M1)exp=9 {I5}, |a(N1)exp=6 {I3}; theory: |a(L1)=29.8~{I5}, |a(L2)=5.5~{I15}, |a(M1)=6.40~{I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=2.5 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.59 {I15}, |a(M1)exp=0.9 {I2}; theory: |a(L1)=2.22 {I4}, |a(L2)=0.61 {I13}, |a(M1)=0.475 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=3.0 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.5 {I2}, |a(L3)exp<0.20, |a(M1)exp=0.64, |a(N1)exp=0.18 {I2}; theory: |a(L1)=1.93, |a(L2)=0.169, |a(L3)=0.0310, |a(M1)=0.413 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=12 {I3}, |a(L2)exp<3.4, |a(M1)exp=2.5 {I5}, |a(N1)exp=0.6 {I1}; theory: |a(L1)=13.1, |a(L2)=1.20, |a(M1)=2.81 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=1.2 {I3}, |a(L2)exp<0.12, |a(L3)exp<0.37, |a(M)exp<0.60; theory: |a(L1)=1.29, |a(L2)=0.112, |a(L3)=0.0205, |a(M)=0.308 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=2.6 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.25 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=1.3 {I2}, |a(M1)exp=0.4 {I2}; theory: theory: |a(L1)=2.44, |a(L2)=0.214, |a(L3)=0.0395, |a(M1)=0.523 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=0.13 {I4}, |a(L2)exp<0.51, |a(L3)exp<0.22; theory: |a(L1)=0.124, |a(L2)=0.0423, |a(L3)=0.0578 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp=0.9 {I3}, |a(K)exp=6 {I3} for the 64.4596|g+64.5670|g doublet; theory: |a(K)exp=5.52, |a(L1)=0.724 for E|g=64.51 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp<6.5, |a(L2)exp=0.8 {I3}, |a(L3)exp<0.49, |a(M1)exp=1.1 {I3}: theory: |a(L1)=5.61, |a(L2)=0.503, |a(L3)=0.094 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=3.2 {I7}, |a(L1)exp=0.57 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.20 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.12 {I1}, |a(M)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(N1)exp=0.03 {I1}; theory: |a(K)=3.76, |a(L1)=0.488 {I7}, |a(L2)=0.097 {I7}, |a(L3)=0.071 {I7}, |a(M)=0.144 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.48 {I13} for the 150.6691|g+150.6883|g doublet; theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.488, |a(K)(E2)=0.361 for E|g=150.68 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=3.5 {I8}, |a(L1)exp<0.92, |a(M1)exp=0.18 {I7}; theory: |a(K)=2.98, |a(L1)=0.390, |a(M1)=0.0835 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=3.2 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.57 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.17 {I2}, |a(L3)exp=0.16 {I2}; theory: |a(K)=4.10, |a(L1)=0.530 {I8}, |a(L2)=0.159~{I8}, |a(L3)=0.138~{I11} {I10}, |a(L3)=1.2 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=3.3 {I6}, |a(L2)exp|?0.7, |a(M1)exp=1.1 {I2}; theory: |a(L1)=3.21, |a(L2)=0.284, |a(M1)=0.688 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<4.1, |a(L1)exp<0.35, |a(L2)exp<0.06, |a(L3)exp<1.0; theory: |a(K)=0.561, |a(L1)=0.0549, |a(L2)=0.0142, |a(L3)=0.0186 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.4 {I9}, |a(L1)exp<0.36: theory: |a(K)=2.20 (M1), 1.60 (E2); |a(L1)=0.286 (M1), 0.141 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=3.9 {I11}, |a(L1)=0.36 {I9}; theory: |a(K)=3.56 (M1), 2.36 (E2); |a(L1)=0.465 (M1), 0.206 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<3.7, |a(L1)exp=0.39 {I15}; theory: |a(K)=2.32 (M1), 1.68 (E2); |a(L1)=0.302 (M1), 0.147 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1 suggested by |a(L1)exp=0.45 for the 82.2465|g+82.2735|g doublet; however, placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp<8.9, |a(L2)exp<9.5, |a(L3)exp<1.5, |a(M)exp<1.1. |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp are consistent only with mult=E1 or M1. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.2 {I4}; theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.453, |a(K)(E2)=2.13; placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes, and |a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)=0.15 {I+4-5}; however, this large an M2 admixture would require, from RUL, a halflife >0.2 |ms, suggesting that |a(K)exp is too large 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=3.2 {I16}, |a(L1)exp=1.0 {I5} for dominant component of multiplet. |a(K)exp and |a(L1) are reasonably consistent with M1, which is what the authors show, or with E2; however, placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes. Mult=E1+M2 gives good agreement with both |a(K)exp and |a(L1)exp for |d|?0.5, but as for the 78|g, this would require a large halflife. theory: |a(K)=0.324 (E1), 2.17 (M1), 1.58 (E2); |a(L1)=0.0326 (E1), 0.283 (M1), 0.140 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.25 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.011-0.10, |a(L2)exp<0.06, |a(L3)exp<0.027; theory: E2: |a(K)=0.256, |a(L1)=0.0257, |a(L2)=0.0384, |a(L3)=0.0338; M1: |a(K)=0.356, |a(L1)=0.0464, |a(L2)=0.00356, |a(L3)=0.000623 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<4.1, |a(L1)exp<0.35, |a(L2)exp<0.6, |a(L3)exp<1.0; theory: E1: |a(K)=0.559, |a(L1)=0.0548, |a(L2)=0.0142, |a(L3)=0.0186; M1: |a(K)=3.92, |a(L1)=0.513, |a(L2)=0.0434, |a(L3)=0.00783 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.96, |a(L1)exp=0.19 for the 106.3117|g+106.3339|g doublet; theory: |a(K)=1.31, |a(L1)=0.171 for E|g=106.32 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$M |a(K)exp<0.023, |a(L12)exp<0.07, |a(L3)exp<0.006: theory: |a(K)=0.0285, |a(L12)=0.00355, |a(L3)=0.000421 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.85, |a(L2)exp=0.08 {I2}, |a(L3)exp=0.08 {I2}; theory: M1: |a(K)=1.10, |a(L2)=0.0116, |a(L3)=0.00206; E2: |a(K)=0.838, |a(L2)=0.239, |a(L3)=0.239 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.35 {I12} |a(L1)exp<0.12; theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.241, |a(K)(M1)=0.338, |a(L1)(E2)=0.0244, |a(L1)(M1)=0.0439 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.26 {I8}, |a(L1)exp<0.08, |a(L23)exp<0.034; theory: E2: |a(K)=0.253, |a(L1)=0.0254, |a(L23)=0.0710; M1: |a(K)=0.352, |a(L1)=0.0459, |a(L23)=0.00414 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.4 {I1}; theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.105, |a(K)(E2)=0.495. |a(K)exp agrees best with E2; however, placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.48 {I13} for the 150.6691|g+150.6883|g doublet; theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.489, |a(K)(E2)=0.361 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.05 {I4}; theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0854, |a(K)(E2)=0.0522, |a(K)(E1)=0.0148. |a(K)exp is consistent with E1; however, placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?3.0 for the 65.7931|g+65.8478|g+65.9486|g multiplet; theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.719, |a(K)(E2)=3.00, |a(K)(M1)=5.18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.15 of the 197.55 - 197.93 multiplet where I(197.55|g)/I|g(total)|?0.3; theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.0384. |a(K)(E2)=0.158, |a(K)(M1)=0.230 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.21 {I5} for the 186.6223|g+186.7420|g+186.8670|g multiplet; theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.270, |a(K)(E2)=0.188 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
With the adopted J|p for this level, this |g would have mult=M2; the |g probably does not belong here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.03. |a(K)=0.069 (M1), 0.041 (E2), 0.012 (E1). The authors assign mult=M1,E2; however, E1 is not ruled out, and |a(K)exp seems too small for M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp>0.04. |a(K)=0.0355 (E2), 0.0603 (M1). Placement in the level scheme not consistent with M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR From 0.82 {I4} (1961Ru01) and 0.75 {I13} (1962Su01) from |a{-K}(exp) and L subshell ratios. Others: 0.82 {I10} (1960Be16) from |a{-K}(exp) and 1.12 {I3} (1961Mo07) from |a{-K}(exp) and L subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E From level energies. 
M From L subshell ratios (1960Mo12,1961Mo07). 
TI Average of values relative to I|g(103) from intensity balances at the 83 level in {+153}Sm b- and {+153}Gd |e decays, assuming no |b- or |e feeding of the 83 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR Value is associated with a penetration parameter of |l=5.3 {I8}; another analysis of |a{-K}(exp) and L subshell ratio data gives |d=0.118 {I+2-4} with |l=5.7 {I+12-10} (1971Pr15) and |d=0.120 {I2} with |l=5.0 {I+6-7} (1972Kr20). Others: 0.27 {I13} (1971Kr19) from |g|g(|q); 0.123 {I4} (1961Ru01) and 0.129 {I5} (1965Ba37 reanalysis of earlier data) from L subshell ratios; 0.148 {I10} (1961Mo07), 0.105 {I15} (1962Su01), 0.101 {I1} (1969Sm04) from |a{-K}(exp) and L subshell ratios; and 1970Me26 and 1974Se08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI From {+152}Eu(n,|g) and (d,3n|g). Others: 12 {I3} from {+153}Sm |b- decay. 
M From |a{-K}(exp) (1974Se08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=?
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR From 0.126 {I8} (1962Su01) from |a{-K}(exp) and L subshell ratios, 0.137 {I1} (1965Ba37) from reanalysis of earlier L subshell ratio data, and 0.139 {I7} (1969Sm04) from L subshell ratio data. Others: +0.085 {I6} (1971Kr19) from |g|g(|q) and 1961Mo07, 1961Ru01, and 1970Me26; 1.55 {I+26-20} from (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI From {+153}Sm |b- decay. Others: 3.24 {I10} ({+153}Gd |e decay) and 3.6 {I4} ({+152}Eu(n,|g)). 
MR From 0.055 {I10} (1970Me26) from L{-1}/L{-2} ratio and 0.055 {I10} (1974Se08) from |a{-K}(exp). 
$B(M2)(W.u.)=60 overpasses RUL limit indicating that the M2 mixing could be overestimated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=?
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR From 0.35 {I5} (1974Se08) from |a{-K}(exp) and 0.14 (value quoted in 1966Bl06) from L{-1}/L{-3} ratio. 
RI From {+153}Sm |b- decay. Others: 2.87 {I17} ({+153}Gd |e decay) and 3.2 {I3} ({+152}Eu(n,|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=?
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI From {+153}Sm |b- decay. Others: 1.49 {I7} ({+153}Gd |e decay) and 1.7 {I3} ({+152}Eu(n,|g)). 
MR From 0.77 (quoted in 1966Bl06) and 0.85 {I7} (1974Se08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI From (d,3n|g). Others: 34.7 {I26} ({+152}Eu(n,|g)), 39.7 {I25} (Coulomb excitation), and 35 {I7} ({+7}Li,4n|g). 
MR From 0.69 {I6} (1960Be16) and 0.58 {I5} (1965As03) from |a{-K}(exp) and 0.67 {I10} (quoted in 1965As03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI Average of values from {+152}Eu(n,|g) and (d,3n|g). Other: 184 ({+150}Nd({+7}Li,4n|g)). 
M$from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E The |g's of 186.2 and 319.7 assigned in {+152}Eu(n,|g) from this level have not been adopted. 
RI From ({+7}Li,4n|g). Other: 8.6 {I29} (d,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Values are discrepant; 542.7 {I2} ({+153}Sm |b- decay) and 541.42 {I24} (n,n'|g). 
RI From {+153}Sm |b- decay. Other: 40 {I8} ({+153}Eu(n,n'|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$70 {I4} (2006Le32), 72 {I4} (1999Sc12), 65 {I4} (1998Bo18), 63 {I2} (1992Ch44), 68 {I4} (1987Co04), 55 {I9} (1985Ab08), 63 {I6} (1973HeYW), 75 {I4} (1964Al09), 68 {I8} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$254 {I5} (2006Le32), 258.3 {I29} (1999Sc12), 279 {I8} (1998Bo18), 255 {I4} (1992Ch44), 284 {I5} (1987Co04), 222 {I33} (1985Ab08), 233 {I20} (1973HeYW), 263 {I13} (1964Al09); other: 207 {I10} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 54.1919 {I4} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 68.2539 {I5} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 
RI From 1964Al09; but not reported in other measurements, so presence of |g is not assured by these data. However, this |g is reported in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 151.6204 {I12} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 
RI$3.47 {I21} (2006Le32), 3.93 {I21} (1999Sc12), 3.50 {I10} (1992Ch44), 4.4 {I8} (1985Ab08), 3.0 {I5} (1973HeYW), 5.1 {I16} (1969Pa03), 5.3 {I15} (1966Bl06), 3.2 {I5} (1964Al09); other: 8 {I2} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$1579 {I20} (2006Le32), 1591 {I20} (1999Sc12), 1639 {I34} (1998Bo18), 1620 {I50} (1992Ch44), 1626 {I29} (1987Co04), 1930 {I273} (1985Ab08), 1620 {I140} (1974HeYW), 1730 {I100} (1964Al09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI Values are quite discrepant, varying from 55 {I2} (1992Ch44) to 117 {I5} (1987Co04). 
RI$61 {I7} (2006Le32), 80 {I7} (1999Sc12), 55 {I2} (1992Ch44, unc increased to 2.3), 117 {I5} (1987Co04), 50 {I8} (1985Ab08), 110 {I12} (1973HeYW), 61 {I4} (1964Al09), 65 {I8} (1962Su01) 
K/L{-1}=10/1.17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$37 {I8} (2006Le32), 53.4 {I24} (1999Sc12), 58 {I4} (1998Bo18), 59 {I2} (1992Ch44), 51 {I8} (1985Ab08), 32 {I4} (1973HeYW), 58 {I3} (1964Al09), 43 {I6} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$25.0 {I6} (2006Le32), 24.50 {I28} (1999Sc12), 25.3 {I11} (1998Bo18), 25.0 {I4} (1992Ch44), 27.0 {I5} (1987Co04), 30 {I5} (1985Ab08), 28.0 {I25} (1973HeYW), 23.6 {I5} (1969Pa03), 24.5 {I5} (1966Bl06), 21 {I2} (1964Al09); other: 33 {I4} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 96.8799 {I7} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 
RI Seen only in coincidence by 1969Un03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 118.1085 {I10} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 
RI From 1992Ch44; other value: 0.06 {I6} (1985Ab08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 166.5503 {I15} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 
RI$From 1992Ch44; other value: < 0.25 (1985Ab08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E From evaluator's adjustment to new energy scale (2000He14) of 172.2988 {I20} from 1970Mu04 in {+152}Eu(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.65 {I4} (1999Sc12), 0.65 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.80 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.73 {I13} (1969Pa03), 0.64 {I20} (1966Bl06); other values: 0.39 {I5} (2006Le32), 1.00 {I18} (1985Ab08), 1.4 {I3} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$18.75 {I21} (2006Le32), 18.37 {I23} (1999Sc12), 19.3 {I21} (1998Bo18), 18.9 {I2} (1992Ch44), 19.9 {I26} (1985Ab08), 23.8 {I20} (1973HeYW), 23.1 {I30} (1969Pa03), 22.3 {I20} (1966Bl06), 23 {I2} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.169 {I10} (2006Le32), 0.15 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.20 {I5} (1992Ch44), 0.17 {I3} (1985Ab08), 0.20 {I3} (1973HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$3.92 {I24} (2006Le32), 4.34 {I7} (1999Sc12), 4.3 {I8} (1992Ch44), 5.3 {I7} (1985Ab08), 5.0 {I4} (1973HeYW, reported 5 {I4} looks typo), 4.68 {I40} (1969Pa03), 5.1 {I8} (1966Bl06), 5.5 {I6} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$9.91 {I10} (2006L232), 10.02 {I11} (1999Sc12), 9.8 {I21} (1998Bo18), 10.4 {I1} (1992Ch44), 11.6 {I15} (1985Ab08), 11.9 {I8} (1974HeYW), 8.8 {I25} (1969Pa03), 11.6 {I10} (1966Bl06), 12 {I1} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$7.09 {I7} (2006Le32), 7.04 {I10} (1999Sc12), 7.2 {I2} (1992Ch44), 7.3 {I9} (1985Ab08), 8.6 {I6} (1973HeYW), 8.2 {I25} (1969Pa03), 9.1 {I14} (1966Bl06), 6.2 {I6} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.65 {I6} (2006Le32), 0.60 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.70 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.84 {I13} (1985Ab08), 0.70 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.74 {I8} (1969Pa03), 0.81 {I15} (1966Bl06); other value: 1.8 {I5} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$0.12 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.13 {I1} (1992Ch44), 0.150 {I22} (1985Ab08), 0.12 {I6} (1969Pa03), 0.12 {I6} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$0.110 {I10} (2006Le32), 0.140 {I24} (1999Sc12), 0.14 {I1} (1992Ch44), 0.13 {I2} (1985Ab08), 0.10 {I3} (1973HeYW), 0.12 {I3} (1969Pa03), 0.13 {I3} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.46 {I10} (2006Le32), 0.63 {I7} (1999Sc12), 0.62 {I3} (1992Ch44), 0.84 {I13} (1985Ab08), 1.00 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.61 {I20} (1969Pa03), 0.85 {I16} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1.001 {I22} (2006Le32), 1.17 {I3} (1999Sc12), 1.07 {I3} (1992Ch44), 1.21 {I18} (1985Ab08), 1.30 {I20} (1973HeYW), 1.15 {I23} (1969Pa03), 1.38 {I20} (1966Bl06), 1.0 {I3} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.406 {I21} (2006Le32), 0.35 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.36 {I1} (1992Ch44), 0.39 {I6} (1985Ab08), 0.40 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.45 {I15} (1969Pa03); other value: 0.54 {I10} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.73 {I3} (2006Le32), 0.70 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.61 {I9} (1992Ch44), 0.99 {I15} (1985Ab08), 0.50 {I10} (1973HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.76 {I3} (2006Le32), 0.62 {I4} (1999Sc12), 0.65 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.84 {I15} (1985Ab08), 0.70 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.60 {I12} (1969Pa03), 0.75 {I20} (1966Bl06); other: 1.3 {I3} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2.27 {I24} (2006Le32), 2.31 {I4} (1999Sc12), 2.30 {I10} (1992Ch44), 2.8 {I4} (1985Ab08), 2.80 {I20} (1973HeYW), 2.5 {I9} (1969Pa03), 2.5 {I3} (1962Su01); other value: 3.5 {I7} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.85 {I5} (2006Le32), 0.75 {I6} (1999Sc12), 0.77 {I8} (1992Ch44), 1.06 {I16} (1985Ab08), 0.65 {I5} (1969Pa03); other value: 1.40 {I10} (1973HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.447 {I11} (2006Le32), 0.42 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.38 {I1} (1992Ch44), 0.34 {I5} (1985Ab08), 0.50 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.45 {I15} (1969Pa03); other value: 0.72 {I15} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$3.10 {I50} (2006Le32), 3.56 {I10} (1999Sc12), 3.8 {I1} (1992Ch44), 3.2 {I5} (1985Ab08), 4.50 {I30} (1973HeYW), 4.2 {I6} (1969Pa03), 4.43 {I65} (1966Bl06), 4.4 {I5} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$1.39 {I3} (2006Le32), 1.49 {I3} (1999Sc12), 1.53 {I5} (1992Ch44), 1.42 {I21} (1985Ab08), 1.90 {I20} (1973HeYW), 1.8 {I3} (1969Pa03), 2.05 {I40} (1966Bl06), 1.4 {I2} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.213 {I21} (2006Le32), 0.304 {I24} (1999Sc12), 0.20 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.25 {I4} (1985Ab08), 0.30 {I5} (1973HeYW), 0.32 {I14} (1969Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 1992Ch44, sustained by 0.0087 (1969Un03, given with no unc); other values: 0.029 {I4} (1985Ab08), 0.0025 {I25} (1969Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.55 {I4} (2006Le32), 0.57 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.53 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.77 {I14} (1985Ab08), 0.80 {I10} (1973HeYW), 0.50 {I10} (1969Pa03), 0.48 {I12} (1966Bl06); other value: 1.0 {I3} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1.48 {I5} (2006Le32), 1.62 {I4} (1999Sc12), 1.61 {I4} (1992Ch44), 1.51 {I23} (1985Ab08), 2.00 {I20} (1973HeYW), 1.60 {I13} (1969Pa03), 1.93 {I30} (1966Bl06), 1.8 {I6} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$4.58 {I21} (2006Le32), 4.04 {I14} (1999Sc12), 4.5 {I1} (1992Ch44), 5.0 {I7} (1985Ab08), 5.10 {I40} (1973HeYW), 5.25 {I75} (1969Pa03), 5.54 {I80} (1966Bl06), 4.2 {I5} (1962Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted mean value of <0.005 (1969Pa03) and 0.0053 {I5} (1969Un03, unc adopted by evaluator); other value: 0.0117 {I18} (1985Ab08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$The measured values 0.24 {I4} (2006Le32), 0.030 {I5} (1992Ch44), 0.132 {I20} (1985Ab08) are discrepant. Adopted is the mean values with unc that covers all values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.158 {I21} (2006Le32), 0.233 {I24} (1999Sc12), 0.14 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.33 {I5} (1985Ab08), 0.30 {I5} (1973HeYW), 0.21 {I10} (1969Pa03); other value: 0.60 {I12} (1966Bl06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.37 {I3} (2006Le32), 0.41 {I17} (1999Sc12), 0.26 {I1} (1992Ch44), 0.48 {I7} (1985Ab08), 0.30 {I10} (1973HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.155 {I21} (2006Le32), 0.16 {I3} (1999Sc12), 0.16 {I4} (1992Ch44), 0.18 {I3} (1985Ab08), 0.20 {I3} (1973HeYW); other value: 0.1 {I1} (1969Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.010 {I2} (1992Ch44), 0.027 {I15} (1969Pa03), 0.013 {I4} (1966Bl06); other value: 0.023 {I3} (1985Ab08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E From level energies. 
RI From I{-ce}(LM)=1.17 (1963Gr09) I(|g+ce)+1.3 and then from |a=3290, I|g=0.0004. The measured values are very different; they include 0.005 {I1} (1974Se08), 0.089 {I9} (1985Si03), 0.072 {I11} (1988Su13), 0.006 {I1} (1988Ve05), and 0.019 {I3} (1995Ku34). 
TI From intensity balance at 83-keV level. Other: 1.3 from I{-ce}(LM)=1.17 (1963Gr09) and |a's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI The seven values included are somewhat inconsistent in that the reduced-|h{+}=3.7 for the average. 
MR Computed with penetration parameter |l=5.3 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$From limit of I(|e,151) |< 0.015%, if the 54 is the only |g from this level, I|g(54) < 0.0026 for |a=18.4. In contrast, the reported values include 0.058 {I8} (1988Su13) and 0.027 {I2} (1995Ku34). Therefore, there is a problem with this |g placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI The five reported values are reasonably consistent (reduced-|h{+2}=2.2) and an average of 0.056. However, if the |e feeding to this level is |<0.015% with no |g feeding, even if this is the only |g from this level its I|g is < 0.026 and if other |g depopulate this level. In the {+153}Sm |b- decay and {+152}Eu(n,|g), the I|g(151)/I|g(68) ratio is between 5 and 9, so the limit may be much lower. Therefore, this |g may be misplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI The reported values are inconsistent, namely, < 0.01 (1992Ch44), 0.060 {I15} (1988Su13), 0.02 {I1} (1988Ve05), and 0.021 {I1} (1995Ku34), 0.00163 {I20} (2017ShZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Data of 1997Ba58 would allow either this |g or 129.5 to be placed here; but value of 132.1 {I4} in 2002Sm09 supports this assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Data of 1997Ba58 would allow either this |g or one of 222.3, 222.4, or 222.5 keV to be placed here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E Data of 1997Ba58 would allow either this |g or 267.7 to be placed here. 
$R{-DCO}=0.90 {I8} (1997Ba58) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Data of 1997Ba58 would allow either this |g or 170.2 to be placed here; but value of 174.0 {I4} in 2002Sm09 supports this assignment. 
$R{-DCO}=1.5 {I4} (1997Ba58) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI I|g(222.3+222.4+222.5)=11 {I4}. 
E Data of 1997Ba58 would allow either this |g or one of 222.3, 222.4, or 223.2 keV to be placed here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Data of 1997Ba58 would allow either this |g or 200.9 to be placed here. 
$R{-DCO}=1.80 {I9} (1997Ba58) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E |g is shown in scheme of 1997Ba58. Possible tabulated |g's of 109.3 and 111.3 keV are placed from 193 and 588 levels, so this placement requires a second placement of one of these |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI Weighted average of 35.2 {I22} (1962Go23), 42 {I6} (1964DeZY), 45.4 {I35} (1966Bo16), and 38.5 {I31} (1967Se09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from G-detector point source measurement. Others: 30.29 {I19} from X-detector point source measurement, 30.02 {I24} from S-detector point source measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from G-detector point source measurement. Others: 22.46 {I14} from X-detector point source measurement, 22.30 {I20} from S-detector point source measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from G-detector point source measurement. Others: 2.49 {I2} from X-detector point source measurement, 2.55 {I4} from S-detector point source measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from G-detector point source measurement. Other: 0.096 {I17} from X-detector point source measurement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from G-detector point source measurement. Other: 0.041 {I4} from X-detector point source measurement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
CC$For a discussion of the problems associated with this value, see the {+154}Eu IT decay data set. 
E From difference in level energies. 
M Half-life indicates mult=E3 or M3. The analogous state in {+152}Eu decays via an E3 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(M1)=4.97 and |a(E2)=134. 
M Shown as M1+M2 in the (n,|g) level-scheme table of 1987Ba52, a probable misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M ce data are consistent with E1 assignment for this component and with M1(+E2) for component from 364.0 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E From the |g-ray "line list" of 1987Ba52. Listed as 190.352 in their (n,|g) level-scheme table. 
RI 1987Ba52 indicate possible double placement, but other placement not given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M ce data are consistent with (E2) for this component and E1 assignment for component from 295 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M Shown as M1+M2 in the |g-ray line list of 1987Ba52, but this is most likely a misprint, since it is shown as M1+E2 in their level-scheme table. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Reported as E2 or E1 for doubly placed |g; from the J|p's this |g can be M1,E2 and the other is E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Reported as E1 for triply placed |g, but |a{-K}(exp) allows some E2 or M1 contribution; J|p's require E1 for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Reported as E1 for doubly placed |g, but |a{-K}(exp) allows some E2 or M1 contribution; J|p's require E1 for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Reported as M1 for doubly placed |g, but |a{-K}(exp) allows M1,E2 or and E1 and an M1. The J|p's for both placements imply M1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Reported as M1 for doubly placed |g, but |a{-K}(exp) allows M1,E2 or an E1 and an M1. The J|p's for both placements imply M1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Value reported in the level-scheme table (table 3) of 1987Ba52. In their |g-ray line list (their table 1) 305.523 is listed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E Existence of transition proposed by 1987Ba52. 
TI Deduced by evaluator from intensity balances at 99 and 100 levels; 1987Ba52 suggest I|g(1+|a) |? 80. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI Deduced from I|g(32.6)/I|g(100.8) in (n,|g) (1987Ba52). This value gives I|g(1+|a)=59, compared to I|g(1+|a) |? 36 from Ice data of (1976Ch08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E From level energies observed in {+153}Eu(d,p) (1987Ba52). From the inability to observe L-subshell conversion lines in this isomer decay, 1976Ch08 deduce E|g < 13 keV. 
CC If mult=E3, |a(8.6 keV)>5.6x10{+7}, but the E{-|g} value lies within 1 keV of 2 of the L-shell binding energies. Also, there is a large energy dependence in the theoretical |a values in this energy region. Thus, the evaluator regards the |a value for this transition as highly uncertain. 
TI Chosen to give intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q) in {+155}Sm |b{+-} decay, 1971Be23 report %E1=98.4 and %M2=6.0 for this transition. Although these two values cannot both be correct, it seems clear that %M2 is too large in any event. RUL<1 implies that |d<0.0012 for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q), 1971Be23 report |d=0.18. This yields B(M2)=67 4, much larger than allowed by RUL. RUL<1 implies |d<0.015. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g). The main part of this |g in {+153}Eu(2n,|g) is placed in {+154}Eu. I|g value computed by the evaluator from I|g(235.7|g)/I|g(372.1|g) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) and I|g(372.667|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1986Pr03, (2n,|g). On this intensity scale (namely I|g(195.6|g)=100), the value of I|g(1002|g) as measured in the {+155}Sm |b{+-} decay would be 196 {I47}. 
M as reported by 1986Pr03. Placement in level scheme requires E2 if J|p 1/2- for the 1106.7 level, as proposed by these authors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.53~{I8} 
RI 1968Wi12 report I|g=49 {I5} for this transition. This was not used in computing the listed I|g value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$%I|g=74.4~{I5} 
%IG=74.6 37 
RI average includes I|g=2000 {I90}, as reported by 1970Re08, but excludes I|g=2200 {I40}, reported by 1967Ag05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.0141~{I12} 
RI 1969Un01 report I|g=0.091 {I23} for this transition. This was not used in computing the listed I|g value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.0023~{I8} 
RI 1966Fu11 report I|g=0.14 {I5}. This value was not used in computing the listed I|g value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.0057~{I8} 
RI 1969Un01 report I|g=0.08 {I2} for this transition. This was not used in computing the listed I|g value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$78.6379 10 36.0 12M1+E2 0.639 16 4.34 7 
$|a(K)exp=3.5 {I2}, K/K=1.00 {I3}, L1/K=0.148 {I10}, L2/K=0.145 {I5}, L3/K=0.150 {I5}, M1/K=0.020 {I1}, M2/K=0.044 {I5}, M3/K=0.032 {I2}, M1/K=0.020 {I1}, N1/K=0.011 {I1} 
MR$0.639 {I16} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.85 {I10} (value seems wrongfully associated to this transition) 
$L1/L1=1.00 {I5}, L2/L1=0.154 {I51}, L3/L1=0.077 {I38}, M1/L1=0.187 {I8}, N1/K=0.062 {I8} 
MR$0.12 {I+3-4} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.5 {I2}, K/K=1.00 {I9}, L1/K=0.11 {I2}, L2/K=0.063 {I11}, L3/K=0.065 {I2}, M1/K=0.026 {I1}, M2/K=0.0143 {I9}, M3/K=0.0134 {I27} 
MR$0.53 {I3} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.10 , K/K=1.00 {I5}, L1/K=0.146 {I8}, L2/K=0.0183 {I12}, L3/K=0.0045 {I7}, M1/K=0.033 {I2}, M2/K=0.0055 {I7}, N1/K=0.0090 {I7} 
MR$0.31 {I2} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=2.9 {I2}, K/K=1.00 {I4}, L1/K=0.088 {I5}, L2/K=0.026 {I3}, L3/K=0.009 {I2}, M1/K=0.029 {I6}, N1/K=0.0088 {I15} 
MR$0.184 {I17} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.82 {I8}, K/K=1.00 {I9}, L1/K=0.100 {I5}, L2/K=0.048 {I6}, L3/K=0.054 {I6}, M1/K=0.026 {I4} 
MR$0.62 {I5} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.93 {I8} (value seems wrongfully associated to this transition) 
$L1/L1=1.00 {I8}, L2/L1=0.098 {I11}, M1/L1=0.174 {I43} 
MR$0.06 {I+2-6} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.5 {I2}, K/K=1.00 {I3}, L1/K=0.148 {I10}, L2/K=0.145 {I5}, L3/K=0.150 {I5}, M1/K=0.020 {I1}, M2/K=0.044 {I5}, M3/K=0.032 {I2}, N1/K=0.011 {I1} 
MR$0.115 {I+17-20} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=2.8 {I2}, K/K=1.00 {I3}, L1/K=0.152 {I7}, L2/K=0.015 {I1}, L3/K=0.011 {I3}, M1/K=0.026 {I3}, N1/K=0.0051 {I7} 
MR$0.115 {I14} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.039 {I6} 
M from |a data, mult=E1, but placement indicates no parity change. Note that the |g is questionably placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.75 {I9} 
M from |a data, mult=E2+M1, with |d>0.5 is deduced. From level scheme, M1 is not allowed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.10 {I8}, K/K=1.00 {I5}, L1/K=0.130 {I6}, L2/K=0.0121 {I15}, M1/K=0.0121 {I3} 
MR$0.08 {I+4-8} (1986Pr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.17 {I5} 
M from |a data, mult=E2, but placement indicates a parity change. Note, however, that the placement is questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0039 {I15} 
M |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I15} (from (2n,|g), 1986Pr03) allows mult=M1,E2. Placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Most of the intensity of this doublet is placed elsewhere in the level scheme (see the discussion in the {+153}Eu(3n,|g) data set). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
BE1W$The range of values includes the uncertainty regarding the contribution of the 39 |g to the decay of this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice and |a(L). From a proportional-counter measurement, 1966Ha26 report I|g=7~{I4}. 
TI$From experimental |g and ce intensities (1966Ha26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g observed, but not placed, by 1966Ha26. Following 1991Ba06, the evaluator has associated it with the 219.27 |g seen in {+153}Eu(3n,|g) and has shown it as feeding the well-established 47.8, 2+ level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Reported by 1991Ba06 to be a part of a doublet, with most of its intensity placed elsewhere. These authors also point out that the energy fit corresponding to this placement is not particularly good. 
RI$1991Ba06 state that less than 10% of the intensity of this peak is to be associated with this placement of the 39 G. Most of it depopulates the 214 level. 
M$The composite 39 peak is E1. For both of the proposed placements, mult=E1 is indicated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E From ce data; from {+154}Sm reaction, value is 29.478 {I2}. 
RI From I(ce) and |a, I|g|?0.7. 
TI From ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$The intensity of both components of this doublet peak is 199~{I19} (1991Ba06). These authors state that<10% of this intensity belongs to the other placement, so that I|g for this placement is between 178 and 199 units. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI Authors' value is 280, but corresponding value in authors' table 2 and conversion coefficient both indicate 28.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from {+159}Sm |b{+-} decay (1987Wi14, constancy of the ratio of intrinsic M1 matrix element within the rotational band to its intrinsic quadrupole moment and |d(96)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from {+159}Sm |b{+-} decay (1987Wi14, deduced from calculation of E2 portion from Alaga rules and I|g(172)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
MR$0.50 {I18} (1987Wi14) from the constancy of the ratio of intrinsic M1 matrix element within the rotational band to its intrinsic quadrupole moment and |d(96). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M$from expected reduced M1 transition probabilities and a reasonable value for the intrinsic quadrupole moment, 1987Wi14 deduce that this transition is primarily M1 with only a few percent E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 220.90 {I18} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g) and 220.8 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g); M2 is ruled out bu RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 384.17 {I19} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g) and 384.4 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g); M2 is ruled out bu RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 488.75 {I17} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g) and 489.1 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g); M2 is ruled out bu RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 555.33 {I13} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g) and 555.6 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g); M2 is ruled out bu RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from 1997Br02 in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). This transition is from the K|p=(8-) isomer to the 8+ level of the g.s. band that is assumed to have K=0 and it is therefore hindered by K-forbiddenness, leading to a decrease in the transition strength of the E1 decay (1997Br02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 616.0 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g) and 616.4 {I2} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g), member of rotational band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). Other: 681.2 {I3} from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g), making the J|p=12+ state at E=2946 keV. 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g), member of rotational band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g). Other: 732 from {+92}Mo({+50}Cr,2p2n|g) 
M$Q from |g(DCO) in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,p2n|g), member of rotational band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 395.5 {I2} from 1998Cu03 and 395.8 {I2} from 2011Pr02 
RI$from 2011Pr02. Other: 100 {I7} from 1998Cu03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2011Pr02, 414.8 {I1} from 1998Cu03. 2011Pro2 also report a 414.9|g depopulating a level at 4363 keV. 
RI$weighted average of 49 {I6} from 1998Cu03 and 57 {I5} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 810.5 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 811.1 {I3} from 2011Pr02 
RI$weighted average of 39 {I6} from 1998Cu03 and 35 {I4} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 427.6 {I1} from 1998Cu03 and 428.1 {I2} from 2011Pr02 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 48 {I6} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 843.2 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 842.7 {I4} from 2011Pr02 
RI$weighted average of 54 {I14} from 1998Cu03 and 48 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 433.0 {I3} from 1998Cu03 and 433.0 {I2} from 2011Pr02 
RI$weighted average of 40 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 28 {I4} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 860.7 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 860.8 {I4} from 2011Pr02 
RI$from 2011Pr02, 23 {I4} from 1998Cu03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 402.0 {I2} from 1998Cu03 and 402.2 {I2} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 31 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 260.8 {I3} from 1998Cu03 and 261.3 {I3} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 34 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 32 {I1} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 208.9 {I3} from 1998Cu03 and 209.6 {I3} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 36 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 33 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 172.6 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 172.5 {I2} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 27 {I5} from 1998Cu03 and 30 {I1} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 252.6 {I2} from 1998Cu03 and 253.3 {I2} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 39 {I6} from 1998Cu03 and 31 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 229.4 {I3} from 1998Cu03 and 230.2 {I2} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 21 {I2} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 298.5 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 299.1 {I4} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 12 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 15 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 284.8 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 285.1 {I2} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 32 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 34 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 342.7 {I2} from 1998Cu03 and 342.2 {I2} from 2011Pr02. This |g is unplaced in 1998Cu03. 
RI$weighted average of 32 {I4} from 1998Cu03 and 27 {I3} from 2011Pr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$ 326 (1997Ro13) 
M$ D+Q also possible from DCO ratio 
RI$ 25 2 relative to 100 for 212+530 (1997Ro13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$E1 or M2 from |D|p=yes; E1 less likely from intensity arguments (2006Ol09, {+92}Mo({+54}Fe,|a2p|g) dataset) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.0 {I1}, typical for stretched Q; M2 excluded by RUL, based on T{-1/2}|<50 ns for 329 level from time gate for coincidences (1989Pa01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.0 {I1}, typical for stretched Q, considered |DJ=0, |D|p=no by 1989Pa01 as linking |g and g.s. bands 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.1 {I3}, typical for stretched Q, considered |DJ=1, |D|p=no by 1989Pa01 as in between signature partners of |g band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.4 {I3}, typical for non-stretched Q or D+Q, |DJ=1, |D|p=no by 1989Pa01 as linking |g to g.s. bands 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.5 {I1}, typical for stretched D, considered |DJ=1, |D|p=(yes) by 1989Pa01 as linking negative parity and g.s. bands 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.8 {I3}, stretched D or stretched Q; if stretched D then 787.1|g should be |DJ=3, overruled by its DCO; E2 linking g.s. and positive parity bands 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=0.72 {+2} estimated by 2006Ol09 from I(71|g)/I(676|g) (observed in 246 and 287 gates) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI because of large T{-1/2}=24.5 s measured I|g belongs to {+141}Gd IT decay, not to {+141}Tb |e decay with T{-1/2}=3.5 s 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$107 {I11} for doublet. From thickness arrows in Figure 1 2008Li08, estimated 92 {I11} from 1209, 4+ level and 15 from 4102, 12+ level 
$Anisotropy=0.19 {i4} consistent with E2 (1986Lu07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(exp) deduced from intensity balance (2008Li08) 
RI$for 193.3+192.6 
ADO=0.58 {i35} 
ADO=0.68 {i6} (2002Li22) for 193.3+192.6 
DCO=2.4 {i3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$The large I|g (and I(|g+ce)) suggests direct strong |e population of this 3/2+ level, but such |e transition from 12 s (11/2-) {+143}Tb is unlikely. Thus, it may originate from another, as yet unknown, low spin (5/2+) isomer of {+143}Tb with possible T{-1/2}=17 s {I4} or |?12 s (1986Re11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$stated to be from measured pol in a euroball experiment (2000Li14) 
DCO=0.55 {I3} (quadrupole gated) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$6.2 {I6} in {+114}Cd({+36}S,6n|g). The intensities from both reactions used to calculate side-feedings for lifetime determination 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) is isotropic because of large T{-1/2}=85 s; |a(K) was used for normalization of |a(K)exp for other gammas. See IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I1}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2}, |d=+0.10 {I4} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.021 {I5}, A{-2}=-0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.133 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.011 {I6} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.012 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0011 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I4}, A{-2}=-0.03 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I15} (1982Pa04). Others: A{-2}=-0.05 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.05 d(1983Ba10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.025 {I9}, A{-2}=-0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I5}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.017 {I5}, A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I7}, A{-2}=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0053 {I7}, A{-2}=-0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I6} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.016 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.018 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.28 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I2} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0022 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0057 {I10}, A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I6}, A{-2}=-0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2}, 30% E1+40% M2+39% E3 (1982Pa04). Others: |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I5}, A{-2}=+0.05 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9}, E1+(M2) (1983Ba10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.022 {I7}, A{-2}=+0.14 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I1}. Others: |a(K)exp|<0.03, A{-2}=+0.30 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I12} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00046 {I5}, A{-2}=-0.16 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.00046 {I6}, A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.00 (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.5 {I5}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.47 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.13 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.15 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.00 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0010 {I2} (E3) (1982Pa04). Others: |a(K)exp=0.00084 {I12}, A{-2}=+0.28 {I5} A{-4}=-0.13 {I6}, may be E1+M2 (1983Ba10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.007 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I1}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.006 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.33 {I9}, A{-2}=-0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (1982Pa04). Others: A{-2}=-0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} (1983Ba10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.005 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.52 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6}. Others: |a(K)exp|<0.01, A{-2}=-0.47 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.04 {I2} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I10}, A{-2}=-0.64 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5}. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I6}, A{-2}=-0.62 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1982Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$I(2165,E0)/I|g(193,E2)=4.5 {I9} (1989KlZY). If I(2165,E0)=20, I(|g+ce) of 193|g, calculated by the evaluators, equals 5.6 (in fig. 1 this value stated as 7). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$|g unobserved, ce measured. 
M$|g rays unobserved, the values of ce(K)(2165)/ce(K)(1579.3)|?3 and |a(1579.3, E3) establish E0 mult. for the 2165.0 keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from R=1.2 {I5}, pol=-0.6 {I5}, |DJ=0. A{-2}=+0.53 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I32} 
$|a(K)exp=0.02 (1986Ya06): great value for the E1 multipolarity is likely a typo. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.13 {I4} (1979Kl04) 
$A{-2}=-1.03 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.27 {I12} (1979Kl04), R=0.17 {I4}, pol=+0.1 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$R=0.77 {I13} 
M$D from anisotropy contradicts to 8+|)6- transition; transition is not suggested by 1986Ya06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.32 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I25}; R=0.7 {I3} 
M$apparently, mult.=D (|DJ=1) from |g(|q), R value has a large uncertainty, mult.=D contradicts to 10+|)12+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$=654.3 in table 1 is a misprint; =645.3 in fig. 1 (1994We01) 
$A{-2}=0.269 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.064 {I20}, pol=0.47 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$the values of |d and |D|d are concluded in parentheses by authors of 1994We01. 
$A{-2}=-0.44 {I3}, A{-4}=0.10 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.51 {I3}, A{-4}=0.13 {I4}, pol=-0.03 {I9} 
M$assignment is based on A{-2} and A{-4} values (evaluators). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$from comparison to RUL and |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g), ({+28}Si,5n|g), and (|a,n|g), respectively. However, see individual data sets for uncertainties of this assignment. Evaluators accept E3 since its use in ({+3}He,3n|g) for normalization gives |a(K)exp's consistent with mults determined by |g(|q) (1983Ko42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$unobserved transition required by the |g|g-coincidence analysis, with intensity from estimated total transition intensities in IT decay (516 ns) (2020Br06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3} 
M 1982Br13 assigned M1 on basis of a large negative A{-2}/A{-0}. 1982Ba46 obtained a smaller negative A{-2}/A{-0} and an |a(K)exp in agreement with E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.099 {i4} and |a(L)exp=0.015 {i1} (1997Wa04) 
MR$0.000(+18) or 0.0(11) (BrIccMixing) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0102 {i5} and |a(L)exp=0.0014 {i2} (1997Wa04) 
MR$0.00(+19) or 0.00(11) (BrIccMixing) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 (Gamma transitions in {+147}Gd, 1997Wa04); it differs from 1709.5 (Fig. 5a, 1997Wa04), probably a misprint 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.00040 {i12} (1997Wa04) for this |g, 1709.6|g (from 3122 level), and 1707.1|g (from 3119 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 (Gamma transitions in {+147}Gd, 1997Wa04); it differs from 1579.3 (Fig. 5a, 1997Wa04), probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 (Gamma transitions in {+147}Gd, 1997Wa04); it differs from 1718.7 (Fig. 5a, 1997Wa04), probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.00040 {i12} (1997Wa04) for this |g, 1709.6|g (from 2862 level), and 1709.6|g (from 3122 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.00040 {i12} (1997Wa04) for this |g, 1709.6|g (from 2862 level), and 1707.1|g (from 3119 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 (Gamma transitions in {+147}Gd, 1997Wa04); it differs from 3124.2 (Fig. 5a, 1997Wa04), probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 (Gamma transitions in {+147}Gd, 1997Wa04); it differs from 1127.4 (Fig. 5a, 1997Wa04), probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this value in Table 1, 2421.2 in Fig. 5a 
E$from Table 1 (Gamma transitions in {+147}Gd, 1997Wa04); it differs from 2421.2 (Fig. 5a, 1997Wa04), probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$See comment about the placement of this |g at parent level 
$A{-2}=0.33 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I14} (1977Ha04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} for 1628 doublet 
RI from I(|g)(1628.3)+I(|g)(1628.8) and I|g(1628.8) 
M from |a(K)exp of 1628 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} for 1628 doublet 
RI from |g|g 
M from |a(K)exp of 1628 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluator from I(|g+ce)=100.0 and |a(total) 
M$A{-2}=0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1982Br13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=0.08 {I9} (1982Br13) 
M$A{-2}=0.16 {I10} (1982Ba46) 
EKC$deduced from intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1982Br13), most likely Q transition, which contradicts the |DJ|p assignment of 2020Br06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1982Br13) 
M$1982Ba46 list average |a(K)exp=0.029 {I3} obtained for the 339-340 keV doublet and the A{-2}=-0.150 {I25} coefficient which indicate stretched dipoles 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 6621 level (previously placed by 1982Ba46 and 1982Br13) 
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I10} (1982Ba46) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 6236 level (previously placed by 1982Br13) 
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I22} (1982Br13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 5557 level (uncertainly placed by 1982Br13) 
M$A{-2}=0.36 {I13}, A{-4}=0.28 {I18} (1982Br13) for this and 984 {I1} at 6906 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 5557 level (previously placed by 1982Ba46 and 1982Br13) 
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1982Br13) 
M$A{-2}=0.11 {I5} (1982Ba46) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.04 {I4} (1982Ba46, for 435.3|g+434.5|g) 
EKC$for 435.3|g+434.5|g) 
M$435.3|g+434.5|g: 1982Ba46 state mult=E1 for one component and mult=E2 for the other. From the proposed level scheme, |D|p(434.5|g)=no, leaving mult(435.3|g)=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} (1982Br13) 
M$1982Ba46 list average |a(K)exp=0.029 {I3} obtained for the 339-340 keV doublet and the A{-2}=-0.150 {I25} coefficient which indicate stretched dipoles 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
MR +3 {I+4-1} or -0.12 {I19} if J|p=2+; or +0.31 {I12} if J|p=3+ from |g(|q) of oriented nuclei in |e decay (60 min) 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$other: I(130.8|g)/I(883.6|g)=0.67 {I8} from comparison of measured T{-1/2} and presented B(E3)(W.u.)(883.6|g) (1984Lu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0039 (1979ShZF,1993KrZW) normalization value; |a(L)exp=0.00062 {I4} (1993KrZW), |a(M)exp=0.000149 {I17} (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.73 {I24} (1992KrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I3} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW), |a(L)exp=0.00062 {I9} (1993KrZW) 
MR from 1993KrZW, 1992KrZN 
A{-2}=0.00 {I16} (1993KrZW,1992KrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I4} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW), |a(L)exp=0.00112 {I13} (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.39 {I15} (1992KrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I8} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW) 
MR +3 {I+4-1} or -0.12 {I19} if J|p=2+ or +0.31 {I12} if J|p=3+ (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.27 {I23} if J|p=2+; -0.23 {I19} if J|p=3+ (1993KrZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00162 {I11} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW) 
MR from 1985Ti01 (|g|g(|q)). Other: >+4 (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=0.030 {I20} (1993KrZW,1992KrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I5} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW) 
MR +2.0 {I+10-7} or +0.04 {I+19-14} (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.47 {I18} (1993KrZW,1992KrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I9} (1979ShZF), 0.0043 {I10} (1993KrZW) 
MR +0.02 {I+21-14} or +1.3 {I+4-5} (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.45 {I13} (1993KrZW,1992KrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I8} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW) 
MR -1.2 {I8} if J|p=3+; +0.6 {I8} if J|p=4+ 
A{-2}=-0.44 {I15} if J|p=3+, -0.46 {I15} if J|p=4+ (1992KrZN,1993KrZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I7} (1979ShZF,1993KrZW) 
MR -0.18 {I20} or +1.5 {I+10-6} (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.30 {I16} (1993KrZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1985Ti03. 2.49 {I7} (1979ShZF) 
MR +2.5 {I+14-8}, or -0.03 {I5} (1993KrZW) 
A{-2}=-0.38 {I18} (1992KrZN,1993KrZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1991CoZY show this |g depopulating the 3991 level. However, such a placement does not lead to a final level observed by them. The evaluator has assumed that E|g is correct, and the final level is 2869 keV as shown by 1991CoZY leading to an initial level of 4119.5 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1991CoZY show this |g depopulating the 4409 level. However, such a placement does not lead to a final level observed by them. The evaluator has assumed that the E|g is correct and the final level is 3358 keV as shown by 1991CoZY, leading to an initial level of 4312.5 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.35|*10{+-2} {I4}; also |DJ=2 from DCO (1990Dr06) assumed to be E2 
A{-2}=0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.44 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.39|*10{+-2} {I6}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 312 {I18} ({+3}He,3n); 272 {I16} ({+28}Si,4n); 301 {I18} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.73 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
E$from 2003Po02; also observed by 2000Po13 
RI$from 2002Bi03 measured branching ratios I|g(1273|g)=0.86% {I7} and I|g(489|g)=99.14% {I7} and relative intensity of I|g{-rel}=489|g; 2002Bi03 supersede I|g(1273|g)=0.85% {I11} (2000Po13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 15 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 16 {I2} ({+28}Si,4n); 19 {I2} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.23 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I7} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.59|*10{+-2} {I9}; also |DJ=2 from DCO (1990Dr06); assumed to be E2 
RI 630 {I40} ({+3}He,3n); 700 {I40} ({+28}Si,4n); 710 {I40} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.41 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.4|*10{+-2} {I4}; also |DJ=2 from DCO (1990Dr06) assumed to be E2 
RI 560 {I30} ({+3}He,3n); 680 {I40} ({+28}Si,4n); 700 {I40} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.41 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.80|*10{+-2} {I15}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 54 {I5} ({+3}He,3n); 17 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.67 {I9}, A{-4}=0.05 {I12} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.42 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.71 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 13 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 18 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); 12 {I2} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.42 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I12} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.34 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.04 
RI 16 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 26 {I5} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.5|*10{+-2} 
RI 24 {I4} ({+3}He,3n); 22 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.30 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I11} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.05 {I4}, A{-4}=0.03 {I6} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.96 {I7}; for the unresolved triplet of this |g and the 665-keV |g from the 10318 level and the 665.7-keV |g from the 9653 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.35|*10{+-2} {I5}; also |DJ=2 from DCO (1990Dr06) assumed to be E2 
RI 191 {I13} ({+3}He,3n); 270 {I30} ({+28}Si,4n); 238 {I24} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.22 {I1}, -0.06 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.45 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.4|*10{+-2} {I2}; also |DJ=2 from DCO (1990Dr06) assumed to be E2 
RI 164 {I10} ({+3}He,3n); 360 {I30} ({+28}Si,4n); 322 {I19} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.24 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.38 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.26|*10{+-2} {I10} measurement for unresolved 752.9 and 754.2 gammas 
RI 107 {I11} ({+3}He,3n); 201 {I20} ({+28}Si,4n); 182 {I18} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.16 {I1}, A{-4}=0.03 {I2} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=0.04 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.77 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=2.1|*10{+-2} {I9} 
I|g=4 {I2} (|a,4n), 16 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
A{-2}=-1.2 {I4}, A{-4}=0.4 {I5} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=0.04 {I7} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.7|*10{+-2} {I3} 
I|g=6 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
A{-2}=0.10 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I22} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.50|*10{+-2} {I8} unresolved measurement for the 882 and 884-keV gammas from the 2694 and 2695 levels, respectively 
RI 77 {I9} ({+3}He,3n); 85 {I20} ({+28}Si,4n); 77 {I15} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.53 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L)exp=0.26 {I8} 
RI 78 {I5} ({+3}He,3n); 192 {I15} ({+28}Si,4n); 184 {I10} (|a,4n) % photon branching: 60.3% {I10} (2000Po13); 61% {I3} (1993Pi01) 
A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.94 {I7}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 130.1-keV |g from 11587 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.50|*10{+-2} {I8} for the 882 and 884-keV gammas from the 2694 and 2695 levels, respectively 
RI 106 {I10} ({+3}He,3n); 330 {I30} ({+28}Si,4n); 255 {I25} (|a,4n); % photon branching: 39.7% {I10} (2000Po13); 39% {I3} (1993Pi01) 
A{-2}=0.40 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.40 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.59 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.24|*10{+-2} {I6} 
I|g=14 {I3} ({+3}He,3n) 
A{-2}=0.04 {I11}, A{-4}=0.03 {I15} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=12|*10{+-2} {I4} measurement of unresolved 241.5 keV and 243.1-keV gammas 
I|g=5 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
A{-2}=0.33 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I7} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.07|*10{+-2} {I2}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 50 {I5} ({+3}He,3n); 49 {I6} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I6} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I4} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.68 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=5.7|*10{+-2} {I11} 
RI 35 {I3} ({+3}He,3n), 40 {I8} ({+28}Si,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.85 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.8|*10{+-2} {I6}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 47 {I4} ({+3}He,3n); 54 {I8} ({+28}Si,4n); 71 {I11} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I4} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.71 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 1990Dr06 list this |g depopulating a 3135.0 level; this must be a typographical error and should read 3153.0 
RI 15 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 23 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); 32 {I2} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.40 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 8 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 14 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); 30 {I3} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=0.09 {I7} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.02 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.90 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.2|*10{+-2} {I3}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 12 {I3} ({+3}He,3n); 19 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); 25 {I2} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.31 {I8}, A{-4}=0.02 {I12} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.19 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.87 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=12|*10{+-2} {I4} measurement of unresolved 241.5 keV and 243.1-keV gammas 
I|g=5 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
A{-2}=0.06 {I9}, A{-4}=0.09 {I13} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=5.6|*10{+-2} {I17}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 15 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 22 {I4} ({+28}Si,4n); 23 {I2} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.74 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=16|*10{+-2} {I6}; also |DJ=1 from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 16 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 24 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); 47 {I3} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.54 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I4} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.49 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.52 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=4.9|*10{+-2} {I15} 
RI 11 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 41 {I10} ({+28}Si,4n); 55 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.76 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I4} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.82 {I6}, A{-4}=0.04 {I9} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.41 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI |?7 ({+3}He,3n); 17 {I4} ({+28}Si,4n); 22|?(|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.21 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.51 {I21}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 429.5-keV |g from the 4552 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<0.6|*10{+-2}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 14 {I4} ({+3}He,3n); 46 {I5} ({+28}Si,4n); 45 {I6} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=0.03 {I6} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.09 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I11} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.88 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI |?24 (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.13 {I10}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and another |g of the same energy from the 15728 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.39|*10{+-2} 
RI |?24 ({+3}He,3n) estimated from coincidence data, since this was an unresolved doublet in this reaction; 29 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.00 {I7}, A{-4}=0.02 {I10} (|a,4n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.22|*10{+-2} {I4}; also |DJ=2 from DCO (1990Dr06) assumed to be E2 
RI 78 {I8} ({+3}He,3n); 380 {I30} ({+28}Si,4n); 270 {I20} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.29 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.39 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.09|*10{+-2} {I2}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 30 {I5} ({+3}He,3n); 223 {I18} ({+28}Si,4n); 130 {I20} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.17 {I2}, A{-4}=0.12 {I3} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=0.05 {I5} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.71 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI |?10 ({+3}He,3n); 25 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); |?20 (|a,4n) 
DCO=0.82 {I6}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 551.8-keV |g from the 12139 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.43|*10{+-2} {I17} 
RI 29 {I4} ({+3}He,3n); 70 {I7} ({+28}Si,4n); 55 {I5} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.20 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.4|*10{+-2} {I2} 
RI 8 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 38 {I5} ({+28}Si,4n); 23 {I3} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.32 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I13} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.01 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I15} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.85 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<3|*10{+-2}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 38 {I5} ({+3}He,E(n)); 250 {I25} ({+28}Si,4n); 233 {I16} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.27 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.70 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$branching estimated to be 2.6% {I2} (2000Po13); 2.8% {I2} (1993Pi01); 11 {I3} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.2 {I4} 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.26|*10{+-2} {I10} measurement for unresolved 752.9 and 754.2 gammas 
RI 31 {I5} ({+3}He,3n); 200 {I20} ({+28}Si,4n); 187 {I18} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I2} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.48 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I8} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.32 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=9.8|*10{+-2} {I20}; also |DJ=1 transition from DCO (1990Dr06) 
RI 21 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 112 {I7} ({+28}Si,4n); 127 {I7} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=0.86 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 23 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n); 23 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.17 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I11} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.23 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 10 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 258 {I18} ({+28}Si,4n); 118 {I10} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.38 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.16 {I9}, A{-4}=0.03 {I13} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.45 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 7 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 276 {I19} ({+28}Si,4n); 105 {I9} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.06 {I13}, A{-4}=0.04 {I19} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.34 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 13 {I2} ({+3}He,3n); 56 {I6} ({+28}Si,4n); 96 {I6} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.19 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (|a,4n); A{-2}=-0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} ({+3}He,3n) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 68 {I6} ({+28}Si,4n); 51 {I8} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.51 {I21}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 430.5-keV |g from the 3368 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 95 {I8} ({+28}Si,4n); 88 {I7} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} ({+28}Si,4n) 
DCO=0.83 {I4}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 355.8-keV |g from the 13040 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 6 {I3} ({+3}He,3n); 500 {I40} ({+28}Si,4n); 220 {I15} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I1} (|a,4n); A{-2}=0.46 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I19} ({+3}He,3n) 
DCO=1.40 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 45 {I5} ({+28}Si,4n); 25 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.29 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I11} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.33 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 106 {I10} ({+28}Si,4n); 75 {I10} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.33 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 24 {I4} ({+28}Si,4n); 24 {I3} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.32 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I22} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.32 {I7}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 1187.7-keV |g from the 16112 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 620 {I40} ({+28}Si,4n); 239 {I12} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.26 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I1} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.33 {I3}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 330-keV |g from the 8640 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 180 {I13} ({+28}Si,4n) intensity of unresolved doublet from 7156 and 5439 levels; |?36 (|a,4n) 
DCO=0.85 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 548 {I33} ({+28}Si,4n); 181 {I13} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.28 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.39 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 40 {I5} ({+28}Si,4n); 23 {I3} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=-0.48 {I4}, A{-4}=0.09 {I14} (|a,4n) 
DCO=0.70 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI unresolved doublet in (|a,4n); intensity obtained from the branching ratio of the 334.9 and 465.8-keV gammas. 76 {I8} ({+28}Si,4n); 34 {I10} (|a,4n) 
DCO=0.74 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI from ({+28}Si,4n); |?50 (|a,4n) since it could not be resolved from the stronger 808.7-keV |g; 150 {I30} (|a,4n) 
DCO=0.62 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 246 {I20} ({+28}Si,4n); 30 {I4} (|a,4n) 
A{-2}=0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I9} (|a,4n) 
DCO=1.26 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI 180 {I13} ({+28}Si,4n) intensity of unresolved doublet from 5439 and 7156 levels; |?26 (|a,4n) 
DCO=0.64 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=1.10 {I9}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and another |g of the same energy from the 13889 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 1990Dr06 list this |g as depopulating a 9249 level; however, their energy level diagram shows this |g depopulating the 9259 level. The placement here follows the energy level diagram 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.96 {I7}; for the unresolved triplet of this |g and the 665-keV |g from the 10318 level and the 666.0-keV |g from the 2082 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.96 {I7}; for the unresolved triplet of this |g and the 665.7-keV |g from the 9653 level and the 666.0-keV |g from the 2082 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.75 {I2}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and the 697-keV |g from the 10761 level made of mostly this |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=1.10 {I9}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and another |g of the same energy from the 8005 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=1.13 {I10}; for the unresolved doublet of this |g and another |g of the same energy from the 3368 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 165.0 {I1} from {+149}Tb |e decay (4.17 min), 164.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 165.1 {I3} from (|a,5n|g) 
MR$value from L-subshell ratios and sign from |g|g(|q) in {+149}Tb |e decay (4.12 h). Other: -0.12 {I7} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 630.7 {I3} from {+149}Tb |e decay (4.17 min), 630.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 630.4 {I5} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from (|a,5n|g). I|g|?3 or <20 in {+149}Tb |e (4.17 min). This |g is contributed by impurities in both cases. |g not reported in {+149}Tb |e (4.12 h) and {+124}Sn({+30}Si,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) for a mixed line in (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 796.0 {I1} from {+149}Tb |e decay (4.17 min), 795.7 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 795.9 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$M1+E2 from |g(|q) and pol in (|a,5n|g); |DJ=1, D+Q |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,5n|g) and (|a,2n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q) in {+124}Sn({+30}Si,5n|g) (1991Fl02). Other: +0.19 {I1} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (1979RaZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 98.0 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 98.2 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Others: 100 {i3} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I6} from (|a,5n|g) are in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 180.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 180.6 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Other: 100 {I5} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$|g(|q) from (|a,5n|g) and (|a,2n|g) gives |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 289.3 {I3} from {+149}Tb |e decay (4.12 h) and 289.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in {+149}Tb |e decay, however, this mult would become unlikely if the 1167 level has a T{-1/2}<0.32 ns, which would only allow mult=D or E2 for this transition based on RUL and the branching ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 527.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 528.0 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,5n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 708.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 708.8 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q,pol) in (|a,5n|g), |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 813.0 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 813.3 {I2} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 100.0 {I13} from ({+30}Si,5n|g) and 100 {I11} from (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 833.7 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 834.2 {I3} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 99 {I3} from ({+30}Si,5n|g) and 77 {i8} from (|a,5n|g) in disagreement 
MR$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 20.6 {I6} from ({+30}Si,5n|g), 16.1 {I4} from (|a,2n|g), and 18.3 {I18} from (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 622.7 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 622.6 {I3} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 93 {I4} for a mixed line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 747.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 747.5 {I5} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {i4} in ({+30}Si,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 325.3 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 325.5 {I3} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Others: 56 {i6} in (|a,5n|g); 33 {i1} in (|a,2n|g) seems discrepant 
M,MR$from D+Q from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,5n|g). Other: |d=-1.9 {I+6-9} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 643.6 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 643.7 {I2} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Others: 100 {i10} in (|a,5n|g), 100 {i2} in (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 899.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 899.6 {I2} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Others: 99 {i10} in (|a,5n|g); 54 {i3} in (|a,2n|g) seems discrepant 
M$(Q) from |g(|q) in (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 661.3 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 661.4 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q,pol) in (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 292.3 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 292.5 {I3} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 21.3 {I4} from ({+30}Si,5n|g), 16.1 {I4} from (|a,2n|g), and 22.1 {I24} from (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 455.7 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 454.9 {I2} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$|d(Q/D)=-1.3 {I+10-13} for |DJ=1 in (|a,2n|g), but (Q), |DJ=2 from (|a,5n|g). However, A{-2} and A{-4} in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,5n|g) are similar and consistent, also with |DJ=2 or 0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) in (|a,5n|g) suggests |DJ=1 transition with large |d value which would indicate mult=M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 750.7 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 750.8 {I5} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Other: 100 {I10} from (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 703.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 703.6 {I2} from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,5n|g). Other: 100 {I10} in (|a,5n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and |g(|q,pol) in (|a,5n|g) with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 13.9 {I17} from ({+30}Si,5n|g) and 15.8 {I19} from (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 159.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 159.6 {I1} from (|a,5n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$M1+E2 in 1991Fl02 
$Other I|g: 29 (1991Fl02) 
$The ordering of 359.6-438.4 cascade is from 1995Fl01. It was reversed in their earlier paper (1991Fl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2} consistent with |DJ=2, Q; |DJ=0, dipole; or |DJ=1, D+Q. Revised J|p assignment in 1991Fl02 suggests |DJ=1, D+Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2} consistent with |DJ=2, Q; |DJ=0, dipole; or |DJ=1, D+Q. Revised J|p assignment for 12267 level in 1991Fl02 suggests |DJ=1, D+Q for the 698.9|g, not E2 as given in 1991Fl02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=135 {I15}:70 {I10}:54 {I7} (1972Vy08,1971GoZS) 
MR$from precise L-subshell ratios measured by 1987BaZB. Other: 0.93 {I4} using all the ce data, except seemingly discrepant K/M and L/M ratios from 1972Vy08. Sign is from |g|g(|q) (1992Tl02,1974Bu26). Other: 0.82 {I2} (1972Vy08) from their measured K/L ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from ce and |g|g(|q) data, with the sign from |g|g(|q) in 1992Tl02 
$(187|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.485 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I5} 1992Tl02). 
$(187|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1974Bu26) 
$(187|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.396 {I16}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (quoted by 1992Tl02 from a Ph.D. thesis by I. Kholbaev from JINR, Dubna (1977)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from (465|g)(352|g)(|q) (1992Tl02). Others: (465|g)(187|g)(|q) (1992Tl02) gives |d=+0.03 {I13}; ce data give |d(E2/M1)<0.5 
$(465|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.14 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I21} (1992Tl02) 
$(465|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I18} (1992Tl02) 
$(465|g)(352|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1992Tl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from (652|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1992Tl02). Other: |d(E2/M1)=0.9 {I+7-4} from ce data 
$(652|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1974Bu26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$from (862|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I11} (1992Tl02) 
$(862|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1974Bu26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$average of |d=-0.31 {I9} from (389|g)(817|g)(|q) and -0.12 {I4} for (389|g)(652|g)(|q) (1992Tl02). For J=3/2, |d=+0.21 {I11} and +0.49 {I8} (1992Tl02). Other: |d(E2/M1)<0.6 from ce data 
$(389|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.026 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} (1992Tl02) 
$(389|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7} (1974Bu26) 
$(389|g)(352|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (1992Tl02) 
$(389|g)(465|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1992Tl02) 
$(389|g)(652|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I4} (1992Tl02) 
$(389|g)(652|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1974Bu26) 
$(389|g)(817|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.010 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1992Tl02) 
$(389|g)(817|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I9} (1974Bu26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$for J=1/2, from (853|g)(187|g)(|q) (1992Tl02). J=3/2 gives |d=-2.0 {I8}. Small values of |d given by |g|g(|q) are ruled out by |a(K)exp value, as |a(K)exp gives E2 
$(853|g)(165|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.31 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.34 {I16} (1992Tl02) 
$(853|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.43 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I10} (1992Tl02) 
$(853|g)(352|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.101 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1992Tl02) 
$(853|g)(352|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1974Bu26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp; ce(K) contains some contribution from another transition (2300 level to 1124 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives M1 or M2+E3. The conversion electron line is is unresolved from that of another |g, but probably dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce) of 165.0|g is much higher than the intensity of the 630.7|g feeding this level. As the decay scheme is incomplete, this difference is most likely due to missing feeding transitions to the 165 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$M1+E2 in 1979RaZZ; |d(Q/D) is in disagreement with 0.93 {I2} from the value in the Adopted Gammas taken from L-subshell ratios in {+149}Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$M1+E2 in 1979RaZZ; E1 in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
$|d(Q/D)=+1.1 {I2} from |g(|q), in disagreement with adopted mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$this is from observed ce(K) corrected by evaluators to include ce(L), using theoretical ratios given by 1969Ha61. 
E$transition energy calculated from observed conversion electron energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp for 565.7+566.7+569.1 |g's mixed peak was measured. The mult of 566.7 was determined to be E2 in 5.8~min {+150}Tb decay and the mult(569.1|g) was assumed to be E2 to determine mult(565.7). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$this is from I(ce(K))=0.032 {I4}, corrected by evaluators to include ce(L), using theoretical ratios given by 1969Ha61. 
E$transition energy calculated from observed conversion electron energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp for 565.7+566.7+569.1 |g's mixed peak and from mult of 566.7 determined to be E2 in 5.8~min {+150}Tb decay and the assumption that the mult(569.1|g)=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g and I|g are from (|a,4n|g) with I|g(235.9|g) coming from I|g(235|g)/I|g(648|g) in that reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$placed from 2306.9 level by authors. From I|g(95|g)/I|g(274|g)=0.25 {I+16-9} in adopted gammas one expects I|g=10 {I+6-4} for placement from the 2213 level as proposed in {+150}Tb |e decay (5.8~min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$not resolved from |g{+|+}. From I|g(511|g)/I|g(274|g)=12 {I+8-4} in adopted |g's (from ce decay), one expects I|g(511|g)=470 {I+320-170}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$placed from 2306.9 level by authors. Placement from the 2211 level as proposed in {+150}Tb |e decay (5.8~min) is also expected. See comment on placement from 2212.7 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placed from 3220.7~keV (10-) level by 1977Ha21; hence 2711.5~keV level not included in Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placed from 3368.8~keV (11-) level by 1977Ha21; hence 2857.8~keV level not included in Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ CE DATA: 1987BaZB, 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Vi05, 1967Ko15, 1962Ha24, 1960Fr06 
MR$from L1/L2=0.99~{I2}, L1/L3=1.03~{I2} (1987BaZB). Sign from |g|g(|q). |d=0.83~{I3} from subshell data quoted in the above table from 1967Ko15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q). Subshell data in the table above give |d=0.29~{I+12-18}. L1/L2=14.2~{I7} (1987BaZB) is consistent with |d=0 
CE DATA: 1987BaZB, 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Ko15, 1967Vi05, 1962Ha24, 1961St15, 1960Fr06, 1958An38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$1982Ba51 propose a doublet at 148.73 and 149.00, but data of 1986BuZX do not confirm this 
$|a(exp)'s too large for mult=M1 or E2. Probably an impurity line in ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Ko15, 1967Vi05, 19 1960Fr06, 1958An38 
MR$from |g|g(|q). Consistent with |d deduced from (L1+L2)/L3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) 
CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Ko15, 1967Vi05, 1962Ha24, 1960Fr06, 1958An38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Vi05, 1967Ko15. 1962Ha24, 1961St15, 1960Fr06 
M,MR$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) 
$ce data for other transitions normalized to 251.86|g treated as M1. 
CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Ko15, 1967Vi05, 1962Ha24, 1961St15, 1960Fr06, 1958An38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1975Ku12, 1971Go27, 1967Vi05, 1967Ko15, 1962Ha24, 1961St15, 1960Fr06, 1958An38 
MR$from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Vi05, 1962Ha24, 1961St15 
M,MR$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(913|g complex)=0.0034~{I10} (1982Ba51,1971Go27) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp gives M1,E2 with no limit on |d value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.37~{I8} or +9.9~{I42} from |g|g(|q); mult from |a(K)exp 
CE DATA: 1982Ba51, 1975Ha18, 1971Go27, 1967Vi05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1982Ba51 give 1050.61~{I9} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0024~{I8} (1982Ba51,1971Go27) disagrees with expected E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.25~{I1}, A{-4}=-0.03~{I1}. Pol=+0.76~{I17} (1977Kl04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0052~{I10} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.16~{I6}, A{-4}=+0.04~{I10}, |d=+0.27. A{-2} value in disagreement with |DJ=1 and pure E1 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.069~{I5}, A{-4}=+0.010~{I7}, |d=-0.46. A{-2}=+0.42~{I6} (1977Kl04) disagrees with A{-2} from 1977Sm01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.20~{I1}, A{-4}=+0.03~{I1}, |d=+0.035. Pol=+0.40~{I10} (1977Kl04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0074~{I9} gives E1(+M2) with |d<0.16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.30~{I1}, A{-4}=-0.02~{I1}. Pol=+0.51~{I12} (1977Kl04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0110~{I15} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>1.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level energy difference=213.81 
M$A{-2}=-0.17~{I8}, A{-4}=+0.10~{I10}; consistent with |DJ=0, D+Q transition. however deduced |d=-0.8 is too large to be consistent with E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.36~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.01~{I2}, |d=-0.03 
A2=+0.41 4, A4=-0.12 5 (1990ShZQ) 
$|a(K)exp=0.125~{I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement from (347|g)(379|g). However, the positions of the 347|g and 379|g could be reversed thus defining the level at 1132 instead of 1164 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.35~{I1}, A{-4}=-0.11~{I1}. Pol=+0.69~{I14} 
$|a(K)exp=0.014~{I2} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.19~{I2}, A{-4}=+0.07~{I3}, |d=+0.05. Pol=+0.4~{I4} (1977Kl04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.006~{I2} gives mult=E1(+M2) with |d<0.25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.26~{I11}, A{-4}=+0.02~{I2}. Pol=+0.63~{I25} (1977Kl04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.007~{I2} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.31~{I17}, A{-4}=-0.11~{I21}. Negative sign of A{-2} in 1977Sm01 is a misprint. A{-2}=+0.41~{I10} (1977Kl04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.008~{I3} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.07~{I8}, A{-4}=-0.34~{I10} (1977Sm01). A{-2}=+0.36~{I4}, A{-4}=-0.03~{I4} (1977Kl04). A{-2} values quoted by 1977Sm01 and 1977Kl04 disagree 
$|a(K)exp=0.010~{I2} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.3~{I3}, A{-4}=-0.2~{I3} 
$Probably a doublet. See placement of 541|g deexciting a 2867 level suggested by 1977Kl04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.35~{I10}, A{-4}=+0.24~{I11}. Positive A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.38~{I8}, A{-4}=-0.08~{I10}, Pol=+0.8~{I6} (1977Kl04) 
$Probably a doublet. See placement of 540.8|g deexciting a 2004 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$Weighted average of I(|g+ce)/I|g(271|g)=0.140~{I5} from 13-y Eu |b{+-} decay 0.133~{I6} from 17.5-h Tb |e decay, and 0.120~{I9} from 9.3-h Eu |b{+-} decay 
$|r{+2}=0.066~{I14} (17.5-h Tb |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Non-zero |d(M3/E2) values have been reported in 17.5-h Tb |e decay, and in 13-y Eu |b{+-} decay; however, these values greatly exceed the RUL limit of B(M3)(W.u.)<10 which requires |d<4.4|*10{+-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR$|d(E2/M1)=-3.05~{I14} 
$|r{+2}=0.046~{I4} (17.5-h Tb |e decay). Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)=1.73~{I19} from |a(K)exp and |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
MR$|d=4.30~{I+7-6} 
CC$From |a(K)exp=0.0059~{I5} and |a/|a(K)=1.18 
M$A comparison of |a(K)exp=0.0059~{I5} with the theory value of 0.0044 deduced from the measured |d, suggests the possibility of an E0 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp in 13-y Eu |b{+-} decay. |a(K)exp in 17.5-h Tb |e decay requires mult=E1, inconsistent with the placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From the level energy difference. The transition is a doublet in 4.2-min Tb |e decay. E|g=439.8 in (|a,xn|g) and 440.7 in ({+9}Be,5n|g) 
M$Mult=D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g). |D|p=no from the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$|d=+0.018~{I+42-18} or +2.1~{I3}. |a(K)exp rules out the large solution 
MR$Other: +1.0~{I5} (1981Fe01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is larger than the theory values of 0.00511 for M1 and 0.00294 for E2. Placement in the decay scheme requires mult=E2. |g(|q) is consistent with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is consistent with mult=E1 or E2; however, placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=no 
MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.3~{I3} (1981Fe01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp lies between |a(K)=0.000310 for E1 and 0.000647 for E2. placement in the decay scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp has a large uncertainty and is more consistent with E2 than with E1; however, placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp lies between the theoretical values for E1 and M1 or E2. The placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp lies between the theoretical values for E1 and M1 or E2. placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is slightly larger than the theoretical values for M1 or E2. placement in the decay scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp in 17.5-h Tb |e decay suggests a possible E0 component, consistent with its placement as a 2+ to 2+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$The 2324|g is part of a doublet with the other component unplaced. From |a(K)exp for the doublet, one or both components must have an E0 component. If partly E0, the 2324|g to 4+ would give J{+|p}(3079)=4+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$0.034~{I5} per |b{+-} decay (from Ice(K)/|S\ |b{+-} 1957Na01). The authors' value of 0.035~{I5} has been corrected by the evaluator for updated theory values for |a(K) and K/L 
M$K/L=4.4~{I4}, L/M=4.0~{I14} (1975Sc32); theory: K/L=4.58, L/M=4.44 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.058~{I7}; K/L=4.5~{I10}, L12/L3=4~{I2} (1979Ar16). These data give mult=E2(+M1) with |d>1.1 from L12/L3, and >3.7 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Ar16 
M$no |g observed 
TI$From Ice(K)=0.0553~{I25}, a weighted average of values from 1979Ar16,1975Sc32,1960Ma11) and Ice(K)/Ice=0.877 (E0 theory) 
$|r=0.25~{I15} (1990Ka35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g/I|g(704|g)=0.0331~{I14} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay. The value of 0.118~{I12} reported by 1973MeXQ appears to be a typo. IT should perhaps be 0.0118~{I12}. From the decay scheme, I(|g+ce)(117|g) should be |<1.27I(|g+ce)(586|g). This requirement leads to I|g(117|g)<0.047 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Ar16 
M$no |g observed 
TI$From Ice(K)=0.120~{I9}, a weighted average from 1979Ar16 and 1975Sc32, and Ice(K)/Ice=0.877 (E0 theory) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Ar16 
TI$From Ice(K)=0.0069~{I21}, a weighted average from 1979Ar16 and 1975Sc32, and Ice(K)/Ice=0.876 (E0 theory) 
M$no |g observed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$1984Bu35 measured E|g-E|g(963|g in Sm)=6.966~{I6} keV. Using the ADOPTED value for E|g(963) of 963.367~{I7} one gets E|g=970.333~{I9} for E|g(970) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0009~{I4} (from I(ce(K))=0.0038~{I15} (1960Ma11). Mult=E1 from |g|g(pol) (1959Wo52) 
MR$From |g|g(|q) (1959Wo52) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From 1970Ad05 
RI$<0.004 
TI$From Ice(K)=1.75 {I7} and Ice(K)/Ice=0.877 (E0 theory) 
$|r{+2}=0.066 {I14} (2004AdZZ, 2003Ad25) 
M$|a(K)exp>437 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.30|<|d(M3/E2)|<-0.032 from |g(|q), and <0.05 from |a(K)exp. other: +0.04 {I20} (1981Fe01). From the RUL limit of B(M3)(W.u.)<10 one expects |d<4.4|*10{+-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$From |a(K)exp, |d=-3.05 {I14}, and Ice(E0)/Ice(M1+E2)=2.43 {I16} 
$|r{+2}=0.046 {I4} (2004AdZZ, 2003Ad25). |a(K)exp=0.0202 {I21} 
MR$|d(E2/M1)=-3.05 {I14} (1972Kr16). Others: -5.4 {I+15-26} (1990Ta19), -4.9 {I12} (1981Fe01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI$<0.013 
TI$I(|g+ce)=0.036 {I4} from Ice(K)=0.0314 {I34} and Ice(K)/Ice=0.878. A limit is given since the authors show a second placement from the 2989 level, based just on an energy fit; however; from branching in 13-y Eu |b{+-} decay, one deduces I(|g+ce)=0.040 {I12}, suggesting that most, if not all of the intensity belongs with placement from the 1048 level 
$X(E0/E2)=6.9 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$1970Ad05 report a doublet in their ce spectrum, with energies 764.3 and 766.3. Only a single line is seen in the photon spectrum. 2004AdZZ assume there is only a single transition, and deduce |a(K)exp by combining the Ice(K) values for the two ce lines. This yields |a(K)exp=0.0057 {I13}. If one takes Ice(K) for just the 764.3 ce line, one gets |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I8}, with the 766.3 line presumably corresponding to an E0 transition. From 13-y Eu |b{+-} decay, one has |a(K)exp=0.0052 {I8}, and from |d=+4.30 {I+7-6} one expects |a(K)=0.00435 {I7}. 
MR$+4.30 {I+7-6}. Others: +3.8 {I6} (1990Ta19),+3.5 {I+17-9} (1981Fe01), +4.3 {I7} (1975Kr16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)=0.214 (M1), 0.135 (E2). For large |d, |a(K)exp gives mult=E0+E2. for small |d, an E0 component is still suggested 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$|d<-16, >47 (1990Ta19), >+44, <-7.1 (1981Fe01). The value from 1990Ta19 has been calculated by the evaluator from the data of the authors. They give only the small |d solution which is ruled out by |a(K)exp. 1975Kr16 also give only the small solution 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$|d|<0.10 or 2.2 {I4} (1990Ta19). Other 1.8 {I7} (1981Fe01). |a(K)exp gives |d>1.2 which rules out the small solution of 1990Ta19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
MR$|d|<0.10 or 2.2 {I4} (1990Ta19). Other: +2.6 {I+21-10} (1981Fe01). from |a(K)exp, |d<0.9 which rules out the large solution of 1990Ta19. 1981Fe01 quote only the large solution 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is larger than the theory values of 0.00511 for M1 and 0.00294 for E2. Placement in the decay scheme requires mult=pure E2. |g(|q) is consistent with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2+E0)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0057 {I14} compared with |a(K)(M1)=0.00380 suggests the possibility of an E0 admixture, especially if the large |d solution of 1990Ta19 is the correct alternative 
MR$+0.03 {I+3-10} or +2.1 {I5} (1990Ta19),+1.9 {I+19-11} (1981Fe01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is consistent with mult=E1 or E2; however, placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=no 
MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.3 {I3} (1981Fe01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp is consistent with M1 or E2. |d=+0.29 {I+9-8} for J(2011 level)=2 (1981Fe01). 1990Ta19 report |d=+0.26 {I3} for J=3. Both works require a mixed M1+E2 mult for J=1 also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$|d analyzed by 1990Ta19 as a 1- to 1- transition from the 3140 level. Reanalysis by the evaluator shows that |g(|q,H,t) rules out J(2169)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$|d=-0.8 {I+2-5} or -4 {I+2-4} (1990Ta19) as reanalyzed by the evaluator for J=2. The authors assumed J=3. Other: 1981Fe01, also analyzed for J=3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$|d=-0.40 {I+4-2} or +23 {I+72-10} (1990Ta19) as calculated from the authors' data for J(2246)=2. The authors give a value for J=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$The value of |a(K)exp=0.092 {I17} given in 2003Ad25 is a misprint. The correct value is given in 2004AdZZ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I5} compared with 0.000530 (E1) and 0.00118 (E2) suggests mult=E2; however, placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From ce spectrum (1970Ad05). The energy fit is poor. The level energy difference gives 2213.56. The evaluator notes further that a comparison of the E|g values of 2004AdZZ with the E(ce) of 1970Ad05 for 16 transitions around E=2212 shows deviations of +0.1 to +2.0 keV with an average of +1.0 keV for the ce energies. the deviation of -1.9 for the 2211.7 line thus seems unlikely, suggesting that the placement from the 2557 level May not be correct. The evaluator thus shows this transition as tentative 
M$Absence of photon line and |a(K)exp>0.03 {I1} suggests mult=E0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Earlier work placed this transition from the 2299 level. placement from the 2667 level is established by 2004AdZZ on the basis of coincidence work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$The uncertainty in the value 0.0080 {I50} given by 2004AdZZ is probably a misprint. The uncertainty given in 2003Ad25 is 5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Earlier work placed this transition from the 2709 level. placement from the 2880 level is established by 2004AdZZ on the basis of coincidence work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2004AdZZ give I|g=0.1594 {I4}. The uncertainty quoted here is much too small. The minimum uncertainty quoted on the strong well-resolved peaks is 2%. The evaluator assumes that the correct value should be 0.159 {I4}. The uncertainty in the branching for this transition given in 2003Ad25 is also too small 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp lies between the theoretical values for E1 and E2. The placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes, for which |a(K)=0.000365 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is slightly larger than the theoretical values for M1 or E2. placement in the decay scheme requires mult=E2, for which |a(K)=0.00031 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is consistent with E1 or E2. |g(|q,H,t) gives |d=-0.74 {I+11-50} or -4.6 {I+18-24}, which rules out mult=E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E,M$Not seen in the photon spectrum by 2004AdZZ. E is from the ce data of 1970Ad05. I|g<0.003 and |a(K)exp>0.049 {I17} suggest an E0 component. If mult=E0, then Ice|?0.0002 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E,MR$Earlier work placed this transition from the 2495 level. placement from the 3110 level is established by 2004AdZZ on the basis of coincidence work. 1990Ta19 report -2.7|<|d|<-0.06, analyzed as a 1+ to 0+ transition from the 2495 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp>0.080 {I8} 
E$Energy fit is poor. This transition is not included in the least-squares adjustment. From that adjustment one expects E|g=1344.0 
M$The absence of a |g line and the large |a(K)exp require an E0 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$From table 2 of 2004AdZZ. The value of 2940.15 {I11} given in table 1 appears to be a typo. From the level scheme one expects E|g=2940.88 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Assignment considered tentative by the authors, but it is confirmed in 17.5-h Tb |e decay, with I|g/I|g(794|g)=0.261~{I10}, and thus an expected I|g of 0.81~{I13}. In 13-y Eu |b{+-} decay, this ratio is 0.50~{I7} which leads to an expected I|g of 1.6~{I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp(471.8|g+470.5|g)=0.0133 {I18}; A{-2}=+0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I5}; |DJ=2 from DCO; theory: |a(K)=0.0132 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp(470.5|g+471.8|g)=0.0130 {I18}; A{-2}=+0.50 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I16}; |DJ=2 from DCO; theory: |a(K)=0.0133 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.31~{I7}, A{-4}=+0.11~{I9} and DCO (1980Gu13) give mult=D+Q with a large Q component, interpreted as M1+E2 by 1980Zo02, but required to be E1+M2 by the revised spin assignment of 2006ShZY and of 2007Ca25 in ({+36}S,|a4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.0067~{I19} one gets mult=M1+E2 with |d>2.6, or E1+M2 with |d=0.33~{I+8-10}. 1980Zo02 assigned mult=M1+E2, which gives positive parity for the 2890 level. 2006ShZY propose negative parity and thus |D|p=yes. The revised J{+|p} assignment is supported by 2007Ca25 in ({+36}S,|a4n|g). A{-2}=+0.24~{I6}, A{-4}=-0.03~{I10} are consistent with either mult assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3=100~{I35}:12.1~{I4}:6.55~{I24}:4.46~{I17} (1985Co08). Other: 1967Ma29. K/L=4.46~{I10} (weighted average of 1985Co08, 1981Ka40, 1978Ar24, and 1967Ma29). The value of 1985Co08 used in this average comes from their subshell ratios. K/(M+N+O)=16.2~{I6} (1983KaZJ) 
Particle parameters: 1969Ag02, 1968Zg02, 1967Na09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.074~{I8} (1991Go22), 0.033~{I13} (1967Ma29). L1/L2=1.34~{I6}, L1/L3=1.85~{I8} (1987BaYQ). K/L=4.2~{I+65-23} (1967Ma29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$1985Co08 report E|g=615.406~{I11} based on calibration using data of 1990Me15. The value given here reflects the evaluator's changes to the uncertainties of 1990Me15. See the comment on E|g 
TI$from I(ce(K))=0.0330 {I10} (1991Go22,1985Co08,1979De22, 1967Ma29) and Ice(K)/Ice=0.877 (E0 theory) 
M no |g seen 
|r=0.25 {I15} (1990Ka35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1970No06 and 1970Ri19 are excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0186~{I7} (1991Go22),0.0193~{I7} (1985Co08), 0.0217~{I19} (1981Ka40), 0.0188~{I11} (1979De22), 0.0179~{I16} (1967Ma29). The ce(K) intensities used to generate these values have been corrected for the presence of the L1 line of the 368|g. K/L=4.9~{I3}, a weighted average from 1991Go22 and 1967Ma29 
M$2008ZaZY report |d=+0.032~{I22}; however, this is inconsistent with the RUL limit of B(M3)(W.u.)<10 which requires |d<4|*10{+-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1993Ka30, 1990St03, 1990Me15, and 1970Ri19 have been corrected by the evaluator for the contribution of I|g=0.0384~{I15} from the 316|g in Sm. The value of 1980Sh15 has been excluded 
M |a(K)exp=0.032 {I20} (1967Ma29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$The value of 1.37~{I4} given in 1993Ka30 is probably a misprint. the evaluator assumes that the value should be 1.73~{I4} and includes it in the weighted average 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0199~{I10} (1991Go22), 0.0225~{I10} (1985Co08), 0.0177~{I18} (1979De22), 0.027~{I5} (1967Ma29). K/L=12~{I+7-4} (1967Ma29) I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=1.74 {I9} from |a(K)exp and |d (evaluator); other: 1.7 {I2} (1990Ka35) 
MR$-3.05~{I14}. Other: -5.5~{I+22-50} (1985KrZU), -2.0~{I5} (1970Ba32) 
CC$From |a(K)exp, |d=-3.05~{I14}, and Ice(E0)/Ice(M1+E2)=2.43~{I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$The 493|g is placed from the 1579 level in Sm and from the 1109 level in Gd, with I|g(doublet)=0.149~{I8}. The value of 1993Ka30 is excluded. E|g is given as a rounded-off value from the level energies, and I|g is deduced from I|g/I|g(764|g)=0.0516~{I19} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay. I|g=0.114~{I5} for the component in Sm along with I|g for the doublet yields I|g=0.035~{I10} for the component in Gd, consistent with the value using the Tb decay ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1980Sh15 and 1975LeZH are excluded 
M$|d(E2/M1)=+4.30~{I+7-6} (1990Ka35) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0063~{I8} (1991Go22), 0.0055~{I16} (1990Ka35, 0.0052~{I14} (1983KaZJ) 
MR$4.30~{I+7-6} (1990Ka35). Ice(E0)/Ice(E2)=0.44~{I17} from the measured and theoretical |a(K) values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1970No06 and 1969Va09 are excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0089~{I5} (1991Go22), 0.0061~{I8} (1967Ma29) 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=+0.015~{I19} (1985KrZU), +0.1~{I2} (1983Bl07); -0.03~{I2} (1975He13), -0.04~{I4} (1970Ba32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00150~{I6} (1991Go22), 0.00168~{I6} (1985Co08), 0.00158~{I8} (1981Ka40), 0.00141~{I8} (1979De22), 0.00168~{I19} (1967Ma29) K/L=7.5~{I10} (1991Go22), 8.3~{I+27-16} 1967Ma29). K/Mn+=30~{I+10-6} (1991Go22) 
MR$+0.003~{I6} (1975He13), -0.050~{I+9-8} (1985KrZU), -0.02~{I2} 1983Bl07), +0.01~{I1} (1970Ba32), +0.026~{I10} (2008ZaZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$1990St02 report E|g=173.17~{I15} with I|g=0.03~{I1}, 1990Me15 report E|g=172.1~{I4} with I|g=0.0016~{I8}, and 1993Ka30 report I|g=0.063~{I2}; however, this transition is not reported in 17.5H Tb |e decay, nor in (|a,xn|g). From the energy level difference one expects E|g=173.08~{I5}. The transition, as placed here, is thus suspect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g/I|g(526|g)=0.884~{I29} in 17-5-h Tb |e decay. The directly measured values are not consistent, 0.08~{I2} (1993Ka30), 0.034~{I3} (1990Me15), 0.07~{I2} (1990St02) and 0.08~{I2} (1980Sh15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$The 1315|g is placed in Sm and in Gd with the Sm component dominant. For the component from the 1315 level, E|g is |a rounded-off value from the level energies, and I|g is from I|g/I|g(970|g)=1.62~{I5}, a weighted average of values in 17.5-h Tb |e decay and 9.3-h Eu |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Not resolved from the 209|g components from the 1643 level and a placement in Sm. E|g is a rounded-off value from the level energies, and I|g is from I|g/I|g(195|g+974|g+1318|g)=0.0099~{I4} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2+E0)
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1990Me15. I|g is somewhat higher than the value of 0.0064~{I5} that one deduces from I|g/I|g(974|g)=0.124~{I5} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$The 563|g is doubly placed with a second component reported in Sm with I|g=0.076~{I7} from the 684 level (2007Ku20). E|g is |a rounded-off value from the level energies and I|g is from I|g/I|g(974|g)=0.0222~{I8} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$The 324|g is placed from the 1434 and 1643 levels with I|g(doublet)=0.275~{I7}. The value of 1993Ka30 is excluded. I|g=0.0187~{I9} has been determined by 2004Ca04 for the component from the 1643 level leaving I|g=0.256~{I7} for the component from the 1434 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$The values of 1970Ri19 and 1990St02 are excluded 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0058~{I4} (1991Go22), 0.0048~{I8} (1967Ma29) 
MR$+4.1~{I+17-11} (1985KrZU), >+13 or <-16 (1975He13), >+12.5 or <-9.1 (1970Ba32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00217~{I9} (1985Co08), 0.0038~{I3} (1981Ka40) 
MR$From 1975He13. Others: +20~{I+23-8} (1985KrZU). >+17, <-13 (1970Ba32). 1970Ba32 also give a small solution but that is ruled out by |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$1993Ka30 report a doublet at this energy with I|g=0.054~{I5}, but show no placement for either component. 1990Me15 report a single peak with I|g=0.041~{I7}. The transition is not reported in any of the other sources, but May have been masked by the strong 444|g in Sm. A weighted average of these two values is 0.050~{I6}. from I|g/I|g(795|g+1206|g)=0.159~{I6} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay one expects I|g(441|g)=0.0235~{I16}. The evaluator adopts the value from the Tb ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$The 482|g is placed in Sm and Gd. For the component from the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference and I|g is from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.0360~{I11} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$The transition is placed in both Sm and Gd. For the component from the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference, and I|g is deduced from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.0906~{I25} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$The transition is placed in both Sm and Gd. For the component from the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference, and I|g is deduced from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.045~{I5} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$The transition is placed in both Sm and Gd. For the component from the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference, and I|g is deduced from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.329~{I9} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0073~{I31} (1967La13) does not agree with |a(K)exp=0.0019~{I2} measured in 17.5-h Tb |e decay. The Tb decay value gives mult=M1 while the value of 1967La13 would require an E0 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2004Ca04. This transition is an unresolved doublet in all other works, with the main component being from the 1293 level in Sm, with I|g=0.0162~{I26}. A weighted average of all measurements of the doublet gives I|g=0.0209~{I20}. The component from the 1643 level in this decay and the component in Sm sum to 0.0207~{I30}, in good agreement with the value measured for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$The 534|g is placed in Sm and Gd with I|g=0.1609~{I38}. The component from the 1769 level in Sm has I|g=0.0065~{I5} leaving I|g=0.154~{I4} for the component from the 1643 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0056~{I5} (1991Go22). The authors' Ice(K) value has been corrected by the evaluator for the contribution from the 1292.8|g in Sm following Eu |e decay 
MR$+0.043~{I17} (1985KrZU), -0.00~{I8} (1983Bl07), +0.00~{I3} (1975He13), -0.05~{I5} (1970Ba32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from the Adopted Gammas of {+152}Gd in the ENSDF database 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.039 {I3} is deduced by 2016Wi08 using X(E0/E2)=0.0122 {I5} from 2005Ki02 (ADNDT 89,77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$As given in 2019Sm03. Mult=E1 in Adopted Gammas of {+152}Gd in ENSDF database. 
MR$from method 1 in 2019Sm03. 
$|d=0.0032 {I23}, A{-2}=-0.069 {I2}, A{-4}=0.000 (method 1). 
$|d=0.0036 {I23}, A{-2}=-0.068 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.002 {I3} (method 2) 
$|d=0.0038 {I27}, A{-2}=-0.068 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I4} (method 3) 
$|d=0.0039 {I27}, A{-2}=-0.069 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I4} (method 4) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$if feeding second 0+ state at 615.4 keV. E|g=2496 listed in Table 5.1 (2014BeZX) is probably a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$If feeding first 4+ state at 755.4 keV. E|g=2677 listed in Table 5.1 (2014BeZX) is probably a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR From 0.261 {I6} (1982Al24 in {+153}Tb |e decay) and 0.246 {I12} (1996SpZZ in {+152}Gd(n,|g)); other: 0.26 {I1} (1962Ha24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR From 0.101 {I10} (1996SpZZ from (n,|g)) and 0.187 {I17} (1982Al24); other: 0.23 (1975Vy01 from |e decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$From analysis of 1973Sa45 which gives |l=-11 {I+12-8}; others: |d=0.058 {I3} (1982Al24), -0.25 {I+12-17} (1983Pr07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR From 0.032 (1975Vy01), 0.045 {I+18-13} (1982Al24), and -0.026 (1975Al09). A |g of 87.55 keV depopulates the 303 level and may influence these values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI From 41.9 {I21} from |e decay and 35.5 {I10} from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q), 1983Pr07 gives |d=+0.06 {I9}. From Ice data, |d=0.057 {I2} (1982Al24) or |d=0.00 with |l=-11 {I+12-9} (1973Sa45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M Data include 174.38 |g from 303 level. 
MR From |g(|q), |d=0.00 {I3} (1978Wa14), data may include 174.38 |g from 303 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR Data are discrepant; |d=+0.40 {I3} (1996SpZZ) and -0.13 {I10} (1983Pr07 from |g(|q)). Evaluator assumes latter data is less likely to involve a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR From Ice (1996SpZZ); other: from |g(|q), |d=0.46 {I+50-13} (1983Pr07) excluding the larger value from the latter reference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI From (n,|g); other: 124 {I6} in |e decay and 18 {I5} in (|a,n|g). 
MR From |g(|q), |d=0.003 {I23} (1983Pr07) and 0.01 {I2} (1978Wa14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From {+152}Gd(n,|g); other: 9.6 {I15} in |e decay. 
M There is a |g of 273.49 from 368 level which may interfere with data on which this assignment is based. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Not reported in (n,|g). 
M |g is also placed from 442 and 548 levels, so mult may not apply here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From (n,|g); other: 21.8 {I12} in |e decay. 
M Measurements suggest E2+M1, but J|p's require E2. 
MR From |g(|q), |d=+0.04 {I14} or -0.27 {I+22-43} or -3.9 {I+15-51} (1983Pr07); J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E In |e decay, this is strongest |g from this level with I|g=104 {I5} relative to 513 |g, but not placed here in (n,|g), so placement probably not correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI 149 {I22} from I|g(320)/I|g(636) ratio in |e decay, but not reported in (n,|g), so may not be correct placement. Also, |g would have M3 multipolarity for Adopted J|p's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI 31.8 {I18} from I|g(346)/I|g(636) ratio in |e decay, but not reported in (n,|g), so may not be correct placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From (n,|g); other: from |e decay 6 {I4} from I|g(610)/I|g(504)=0.11 {I9} (note 678 |g not reported). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI From |e decay; other: 26 {I3} from (n,|g) normalized for 1071 |g. 
M Assigned E1,E2, but J|p's require E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI From Ice(L) and |a{-L}(M1)=0.57 and |a{-L}(E2)=4.00. Also, see comment associated with I|g(76.3). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
CC Evaluator's estimate |a(M1) |? 500 and |a(E2) |? 2|*10{+6}. 
TI Value assigned to give 100% decay from the isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI The 75.0, 76.0, and 77.9 |g's are not resolved; the latter two also occur in (|a,3n|g), where they are not resolved, but a relative I|g is given. From Ice(L)=1.4 {I5} and |a{-L}, I|g(76)=18 {I7}. Also, from I|g(75+76+77)=28 {I3} (1970Bo02), I|g(75)=4 {I3}, and I|g(78) |? 2.5, then I|g(76)=21 {I5}. This I|g(76) value is adopted here. In (|a,3n|g), I|g(77)/I|g(76) |? 0.11, which is in agreement with the ratio of 2.5/21 adopted here. 
M Recognizing the E1-E2 doublet character of the 79 |g observed in (|a,3n|g) and the isomer decay removes the multipolarity discrepancy pointed out by the authors. 
CEL,CEM See comment for 77.9 |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
CEL,CEM 1970Bo02 report Ice(L)=9.8 {I12} and Ice(M)=3.1 {I7} for a |g of |? 79 keV. Based on the I|g and multipolarities for the 76.0 and 77.9 |g's, the evaluator assigns |? 15% of these intensities to the 76.0 |g and the remainder to the 77.9 |g. 
RI See I|g comment for 76 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E From level energy difference 
RI Calculated from I|g(1+|a) and |a, for M1 multipolarity 
TI From 1982Al24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI Only placed here by 1991Gr21; main placement from 129 level. 
M Measurements give M1+E2 for doublet; J|p's requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI 1991Gr21 also places |g from 436 level. 
M,MR |g is doubly placed, so mult. and |d may not apply. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI From the three references, I|g=2.64 {I16}. This probably includes I|g=1.3 and 0.8 from 442 and 548 levels (1982Al24), leaving 0.5 from this level. Other: 0.8 (1982Al24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI |g placed here by 1991Gr21; main placement is from 316 level. 
M,MR |g is doubly placed, so E1+M2 assignment and |d may not apply and J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI Values range from 4.9 {I9} to 7.0 {I5}. 
M From 1982Al24. Assignment is inconsistent with |a{-K} of 1975Vy01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI Values range from 5.9 {I9} to 8.3 {I4}. Value may include the I|g=0.8 for 354.4 |g from 483 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI Values range from 6.8 {I15} to 14.2 {I1}. 
E |g is also placed from 782 level in 1991Gr21. 
M,MR mult. and |d assigned, but |g may be doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From 1982Al24; average of three is I|g=0.50 {I15}, which includes the 419 |g from the 709 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E |g is also placed from 782 level in 1991Gr21. 
RI Average of values from 1991Gr21 and 1974Pe16; in contrast 1975Vy01 gives 0.5 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Previous evaluation only places |g from 775 level, but 1991Gr21 only places it from this new level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Previous evaluation only places |g from 955 level, but 1991Gr21 only places it from this new level. 
RI Values range from 1.4 {I4} to 3.0 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Previous evaluation only places |g from 1422 level, but 1991Gr21 only places it from this new level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Placement doubtful since mult. conflicts with J|p's. 
M Assigned M1, but |g multiply placed and J|p's require E1 or M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E |g is also placed from 782 level in 1991Gr21. 
M Previously assigned M1 and 1991Gr21 assigns E1, but |g may be doubly placed. J|p's require E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI Previously this |g only placed from 865 level with I|g=1.6 {I5}, and only placed here in 1991Gr21 with I|g=0.21 {I2}. 
M Assigned E1 from 1991Gr21 based on previous Ice data, but J|p's require M1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Placement doubtful; in previous evaluation |g is placed only from 508 level and energy fit is poor, but in 1991Gr21 it is only placed here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E May be doublet with |g's of 392.9 and 393.8 from this level. 
RI Values range from 1.8 {I3} to 4.0 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI From 1982Al24; average of the three is I|g=0.50 {I15} for the 418.9 |g placed from the 548 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Previous evaluation only places this |g from this level, but 1991Gr21 only places it from new 607 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Previous evaluations has |g of similar energy from 490 and 720 levels, whereas 1991Gr21 has only this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI Average of values from 1991Gr21 and 1974Pe16; in contrast 1975Vy01 gives 0.5 {I5} and 1991Gr21 gives 1.14 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI Values range from 6.8 {I15} to 14.2 {I1}. 
M,MR Assigned E2+M1, but |g may be doublet and J|p's require E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI From I|g(doublet)=8.7 {I5} and I|g(component from 945 level) as given by 1982Al24. 
MR Value is questionable since authors may not have been aware that the peak is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Final level is 315.36 or 315.988 
M,MR Previous assignment M1+E2 and |d=-3.1 {I4} with final level of 316.11, but 1991Gr21 assigns E1 and final level 315.42. |g may be doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO much less than 1 
E Assignment from 17/2+ to 15/2+ shown in Table I of 2002Br52 seems to be an error; it should be 21/2+ to 19/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp=2.81 {I17}, |a(L2)exp=2.09 {I13}, |a(L3)exp=2.28 {I14} (1996SpZZ) 
MR Other: 0.270 {I6} from {+153}Tb |e decay (1982Al24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp=1.47 {I12}, |a(L2)exp=0.320 {I26}, |a(L3)exp=0.340 {I27} (1996SpZZ) 
MR Other: 0.157 {I11} from {+153}Tb |e decay (1982Al24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=5.15 {I41}, |a(L1)exp=0.79 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.08 {I6}, |a(L3)exp=0.050 {I9}, |a(M2)exp=0.030 {I4} (1996SpZZ) 
MR Other: 0.190 {I18} from {+153}Tb |e decay (1982Al24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.02 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.140 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.0100 {I4} (1996SpZZ) 
MR From {+153}Tb |e decay (1982Al24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(M1)exp=0.23 {I5} (1996SpZZ) 
M Assigned (E1,M2) from placement and other studies, but here |g is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.670 {I27}, |a(L1)exp=0.090 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.0200 {I24}, |a(L3)exp=0.0100 {I16} (1996SpZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L2)exp=0.56 {I23}, |a(L3)exp=3.8 {I12} (1996SpZZ) 
M ce data imply M1,E2 but |DJ|p requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
CC$weighted average of the measured values 1.194~{I19} (1995Ma03) and 1.200~{I20} (1962Lu03), both from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. See the comment on the |a(exp) value in the {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay data set. 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=0.0~{I10} (1978We08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.091~{I6} (1972Na21,1968Ng01). Others: 1974Go30, 1996SpZZ. 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=-0.009~{I+22-26} (1978We08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0087~{I5} (1977Ya04), 0.009~{I1} (1996SpZZ), and 0.0075~{I30} (1972Na21). Others: 1972Vy04, 1968Br20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp>3.0 (1996SpZZ). Others: 1968Br20, 1969An01, 1972Na21, and 1977Ya04. 
TI$From {+153}Gd(n,|g) and {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Others: 1.2~{I6} from {+154}Tb |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.031~{I1} (1971Ri08,1974Go30,1972Vy04,1996SpZZ). 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=-0.009~{I+11-12} (1978We08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay; from {+153}Gd(n,|g), I|g=0.75~{I2}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.48~{I9} (1996SpZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0155~{I11} (1971Ri08,1977Ya04,1972Na21,1996SpZZ). Other: 1968Br20. 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=+0.001~{I1} (1969Ha36) and +0.010~{I20} (1977Gu10). Others: 1983Gi07 and 1989Ki10. |d(E2/M1)<-22 (1969HaZJ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.040~{I3} (1968Br20,1971Ma65,1971Ru05,1972Na21,1972Vy04,1977Ya04, and 1996SpZZ). Others: 1964Ha47 and 1968Ng01. 
MR$|d(E2/M1) from 1977Gu10, 1983Gi07, and 1989Ki10. Others: 1969Ha01, 1969HaZJ, 1971Wh01 and 1992Ak03. 
MR K(E0)/K(M1+E2)=7.8 and K(E0)/G(E2)=0.0336 11 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, for comparison |a(M1+E2)=0.00635. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0080~{I15} (1971Ru05,1996SpZZ). Others: 1968Br20 and 1972Vy04. 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=+0.02~{I2} (1969Ha36,1977Gu10,1983Gi07,1989Ki10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00346~{I10} (1968Br20,1968Ng01,1971Ru05,1972Na21,1972Vy04, 1977Ya04,1996SpZZ). Penetration parameter: 70<|l<190 (1983Gi07). 
MR$unweighted average of -8.0~{I10} (1970Ru09), -10.2~{I10} (1971La11), -9.5~{I+6-8} (1977Gu10), -9.7~{I10} (1983Gi07), -10.2~{I8} (1983Le19), -8.1~{I5} (1989Ki10) and -10.1~{I+9-12} (1992Ak03). Others: 1960De16, 1969BoZK,1969Ha01,1969Ha36,1969HaZJ,1969Va09,1971Wh01, 1972Go35, and 1973Ob01. 
MR K(E0)/G(E2)=0.00033 9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00245~{I10} (1968Br20,1968Ng01,1972Na21,1972Vy04,1977Ya04,1996SpZZ). 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=0.0~{I9} (1978We08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.044~{I3} (1971Ru05,1972Na21,1974Go30,1977Ya04,1996SpZZ). Others: 1968Br20,1968Ha28,1969An01. 
MR$unweighted average of +2.2~{I9} (1977Gu10), +2.9~{I+21-9} (1978We08), and +3.5~{I+10-8} (1982Da12). Others: 1969HaZJ, 1971Ru05, 1971Wh01. 
MR K(E0)/K(M1+E2)=6.7 
CC$Value based on |a(K)exp, for comparison |a(M1+E2)=0.0071~{I2} for the mixed multipole with the listed value of |d and neglecting the presence of an E0 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Others: 24.3~{I14}, 28.9~{I11}, and 29.1~{I15}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00425~{I15} (1971Ru05,1996SpZZ). Others: 1968Br20, 1968Ng01, 1972Na21, and 1972Vy04. 
MR$unweighted average of -5.7~{I3} (1971Wh01), -5.9~{I6} (1970Ru09), -4.9~{I+8-18} (1972Go35), -6.1~{I2} (1977Gu10), -7.0~{I+10-8} (1983Gi07), -7.6~{I4} (1989Ki10) and -5.8~{I+13-18} (1992Ak03). Others: 1969Ha36, 1969HaZJ, 1969Va09, and 1978We08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00235~{I10} (1968Br20,1968Ng01,1971Ri08,1972Na21,1996SpZZ); other: 1972Vy04. 
MR$unweighted average of -8.5~{I10} (1970Ru09), -6.6~{I7} (1971La11), -7.8~{I+3-2} (1977Gu10), -6.0~{I+11-16} (1978We08), -7.1~{I+5-4} (1983Gi07), -8.7~{I4} (1989Ki10) and -7.1~{I+26-30} (1992Ak03); others: 1960De16, 1969Ha36, 1969HaZJ, 1969Va09, 1971Wh01, 1972Go35, 1973Ob01, and 1982Da12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). |a(K)exp=0.017~{I2} (1971Ri08,1974Go30,1972Vy04) which implies E2 character, but peak is a doublet. 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=-0.004~{I11}, but peak is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0009~{I1} (1996SpZZ). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.16~{I+31-18} (1977Gu10). 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.052 exceeds RUL=0.01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Others: 31.8~{I10} from {+153}Gd(n,|g) and 19.8~{I25} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020~{I1} compared to |a(K)(E1)=0.0012. 
MR$From -0.01~{I+8-6} (1971Wh01) and +0.08~{I3} (1977Gu10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0009 (1996SpZZ). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=+0.04~{I3} (1977Gu10,1982Da12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Other: 4.2~{I4} from {+153}Gd(n,|g) where |g is multiply placed. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.024~{I2} (1996SpZZ) which implies E2, but |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0039~{I3} (1971Ru05,1977Ya04,1996SpZZ). Others: 1972Na21 and 1972Vy04. 
MR$unweighted average of -4.4~{I5} (1971Wh01), -3.0~{I10} (1969Va09), -4.0~{I+3-4} (1977Gu10), -3.8~{I3} (1989Ki10). Others: 1969Ha36, 1969HaZJ, 1978We08, and 1983Gi07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020~{I2} (1977Ya04,1996SpZZ). 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=0.05~{I7} (1977Gu10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From Sm(|a,xn|g); from {+153}Gd(n,|g) I|g(318)>I|g(648) but with large uncertainty. 
M$DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.00~{I7} (1978We08); |g is assumed to be E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.039~{I7} (1974Go30). 
MR$From 1978We08. Others: 3.5~{I+25-20} and 1.8~{I+3-2} quoted in 1974Go30. 
MR K(E0)/K(M1+E2)=4.3. 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, for comparison |a(M1+E2)=0.0095~{I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=+0.04~{I+21-23} (1978We08); |g is assumed to be E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.000635~{I15} (1968Br20,1968Ng01,1971Ru05,1972Na21,1996SpZZ). 
MR$unweighted average of +0.047~{I5} (1969Va09), +0.015~{I12} (1970Ru09), +0.054~{I10} (1972Go35), and +0.025~{I20} (1983Gi07). Others: 1960De16, 1964Ca12, 1989Ki10 and 1992Ak03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). |a(K)exp=0.0050 (1972Vy04), but |g is multiply placed. 
MR$|d(Q/D)=0.012~{I+33-12} (1982Da12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From 1996SpZZ (n,|g). In {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay, I|g=100~{I35} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0006~{I1} (1975So03,1996SpZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0,E2,M1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Others: 45.0~{I9} from (n,|g) and 27~{I4} from {+154}Tb |e decay (21.5 h). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.033~{I8} (1977Ya04,1996SpZZ). 
MR K(E0)/K(M1+E2)=3.1 11. 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp. For comparison, |a(E2,M1)=0.012~{I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.30~{I6} (1996SpZZ) which implies M1,E2, but |g is doubly placed. |g not reported in {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). |g not reported in {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
RI$from {+154}Eu, |b{+-} decay. Others: 19~{I5} from {+154}Tb |e decay (22.7 h); 35~{I2}, from Sm(|a,xn|g); and>18 from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0054~{I16} (1996SpZZ). DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E0+M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Other: 21.5~{I9} from {+153}Gd(n,|g), where most of the intensity must be from another level. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.093~{I11} (1996SpZZ) which implies E0,M1,E2, but this is for another placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0,M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.011~{I4} (1971Ru05,1972Vy04). 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, for comparison, |a(M1,E2)=0.0080~{I23}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0,M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Other: 30~{I12} from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0032~{I12} (1996SpZZ). 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, for comparison |a(M1,E2)=0.0018~{I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0006 (1996SpZZ). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.00~{I2} (1971Wh01,1977Gu10,1983Gi07,1989Ki10). Others: 1969Ha36 and 1969HaZJ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0124~{I21} (1974Go30). DCO and linear polarization (2019Ma70). 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=0.00~{I22} (1978We08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
RI$from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. In (n,|g) I|g=8.1~{I11}, but peak is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. From {+153}Gd(n,|g), I|g=10.9~{I16}. Other: 9.5~{I7}, from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.029~{I4} (1971Ri08,1996SpZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h). From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay, E|g=1522.19~{I16}, but this leads to a poor energy fit. 
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay, I|g=3.0~{I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E0+M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.167~{I22} in (n,|g) (1996SpZZ) and>1.4 in decay (1968Br20), both of which imply an E0 component, but note that in those studies, there are two closely spaced "533" |g's. Others: 1969An01 and 1972Na21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Reported I|g=63~{I22} divided by evaluator, based on calculation of I|g(1716.9) from 1838 level in (n,|g) from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay data for 1838 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0030~{I5} (1968Br20,1972Na21) or 0.062~{I11} (1968Ng01,1996SpZZ); the |d value agrees with the smaller value. 
MR$unweighted average of +0.10~{I10} (1972Go35), +0.06~{I3} (1977Gu10), +0.02~{I3} and -0.10~{I8} (1983Gi07) and 0.01~{I7} (1992Ak03). Other: 1973Ob01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0019~{I1} (1968Br20,1968Ng01,1971Ru05,1972Na21,1972Vy04,1996SpZZ). 
MR$unweighted average of +0.040~{I11} (1969Va09), +0.015~{I15} (1970Ru09), -0.04~{I4} (1972Go35), +0.04~{I+2-4} (1973Ob01), +0.05~{I4} (1977Gu10), +0.05~{I4} (1983Gi07), and 0.00~{I4} (1983Le19). Other: 1960De16. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0013~{I5} (1972Na21). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.07~{I17} (1983Gi07), 0.18~{I15} (1992Ak03), both from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 
CC$value for a pure E1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Other: 22.8~{I18} from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00037~{I10} (1972Na21). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.000~{I10} (1977Gu10,1983Gi07,1989Ki10), 0.20~{I7} (1992Ak03), both from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Others: 1960De16, 1971Wh01, and 1972Go35. 
CC$value for a pure E1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.053~{I7} (1974Go30). 
MR$From -0.69~{I+12-14} (1978We08). Others: 1.0~{I+7-6} and 1.2~{I+4-3} quoted in 1974Go30. 
MR K(E0)/K(M1+E2)=3.8. 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, compared to |a(M1+E2)=0.0130~{I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From Sm(|a,xn|g). Other: 9.8 from {+150}Nd({+9}Be,5n|g). 
M$angular distribution (1972Re04, 1978We08). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=+0.06~{I+15-13} (1978We08); |g is assumed to be E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From 1994Wu01 (|a,2n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.10 (1972Vy04). 
MR$|d(E2/M1)=-0.004 (1978We08) 
MR K(E0)/K(M1+E2)=AP 1.0 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, compared to |a(M1,E2)=0.056~{I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h and 22.7 h). Others: 21~{I5} from {+153}Gd(n,|g), 139~{I22} from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay and 68~{I10} from (|a,2n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0100~{I11} (1971Ri08,1972Vy04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From {+153}Gd(n,|g) and {+154}Tb |e decay (22.7 h). Others: 54~{I14} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h) and not observed in {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Reported as strongest |g from level in {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay, but not reported in other studies, so assignment is doubtful. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h and 22.7 h). Others: 109~{I10} from {+153}Gd(n,|g) and 70~{I13} from {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Others: 120~{I40} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h) and 82~{I4} from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0021~{I7} (1996SpZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
RI$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay. Other: 560~{I41} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$angular distribution (1978We08) and linear polarization (2019Ma70). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.03~{I+5-4} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.95~{I11} (1975So03), 0.73 (1972Vy04), and<0.52~{I7} (1996SpZZ). 
MR$From 1978We08 (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (22.7 h). Other: 39~{I4} from (|a,2n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.042~{I6} (1975So03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1994Wu01 (|a,2n|g). This |g is not reported in the |e decay of 22.7 h {+154}Tb, where, based on relative-intensity considerations, it should have been observed. In (n,|g) |g of 647.7~{I2} placed here and 1775 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$Values disagree; I|g(1900)/I|g(2024)=10~{I3} from {+153}Gd(n,|g) and 0.35~{I17} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.0 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Value represents an upper limit, since the peak contains |a contribution from a transition in {+153}Gd. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Division for doubly placed |g in (n,|g) based on evaluator's estimate of limit for I|g(1033)/I|g(683) in {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (21.5 h). Other: 152~{I24} from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020~{I7} (1975So03,1996SpZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (21.5 h). Other: 248~{I72} from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00061~{I25} (1975So03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=?
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$From Sm(|a,xn|g). Other: 61~{I5} from {+154}Tb |e decay (22.7 h). 
M$|a(K)exp<0.00092 (1971Ri08). Other: 0.0063 (1972Vy04). 
MR$from 1978We08 (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$From Sm(|a,xn|g). Other: 172~{I11} from {+154}Tb |e decay (22.7 h). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00059~{I13} (1971Ri08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$evaluator's division of doublet with I|g=4.1~{I4}, based on failure to report 945 |g from 2342 level in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0007~{I3} (1996SpZZ) which is interpreted as E1 or E2; this conflicts with J{+|p} assignments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.022 (1974Go30) which is interpreted as (E2) (|g is doubly placed); DCO (2019Ma70). 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=+0.02~{I8} (1978We08), which assumes |g is E2, but |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.046~{I12} (1974Go30). |a(K)exp > |a(K)(M1) > |a(K)(M1+E2) > |a(K)(E2) signals E0 component 
MR$From 1974Go30. 
CC$Based on |a(K)exp, for comparison |a(M1+E2)=0.0145~{I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Value is from 2001KuZS, {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h). Placement and I|g value are from J.L. Wood (priv. comm., April, 2008). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+153}Gd(n,|g). 
M$|a(M1)exp=0.23~{I5} (1996SpZZ), which is interpreted as M1, but |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay. Other: 25~{I6} relative to I|g(1934) from {+153}Gd(n,|g) where 1490 is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from angular distribution (1978We08), M1+E2 from level scheme. 
MR$0.543 {I+100-7} and -0.394 {I+59-72} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h) where it is doubly placed; in (n,|g) I|g=62~{I8} but is only placed from 1294 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=42~{I5} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h) and<32 in (n,|g) from evaluator's estimate of the intensity limit for unreported |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h) where it is doubly placed; in (n,|g) |g is placed only from two other levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 36~{I5} from {+154}Tb |e decay (9.973 h) and<32 from evaluator's estimate of intensity limit for unreported |g from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+153}Gd(n,|g). Other: 31~{I3} from {+154}Tb |e decay (21.5 h). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.030~{I1} (1996SpZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.016~{I2} (1971Ri08,1972Vy04,1974Go30), which is interpreted as E2 (|g is doubly placed); DCO confirms E2 (2019Ma70). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+153}Gd(n,|g), E|g=2809.8~{I4}, but this is not in agreement with E|g to the ground state. 
RI$from {+154}Tb |e decay (21.5 h) (2014BeZX). Other: 87~{I7} from {+153}Gd(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+154}Tb |e decay (21.5 h) (2014BeZX; authors normalized this branching ratio to 100 for 2949.5|g). Others: 47 {I4} from {+153}Gd(n,|g) (1996SpZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC$Weighted average of the measured values 1.200~{I20} (1962Lu03) and 1.194~{I19} (1995Ma03). The former value was determined by a high-accuracy coincidence-sum method using a 4|p NaI(Tl) detector. The latter used the measured T{-1/2} value and the B(E2) of the deexciting |g to deduce |a(exp). The B(E2) value employed in this calculation was obtained from the weighted average of the following B(E2)|^ values: 3.85~{I8} (1977Ro08,1977Ro26), 3.90~{I6} (1977Sc33) and 3.83~{I4} (1977Wo02), from Coul. ex.; and 3.87~{I6} (1983La08), from muonic x-ray studies. (The |a(exp) value actually reported by 1995Ma03 was 1.193~{I19}. The slight difference between this and the |a(exp) given above results from a different choice of statistical weights used by the evaluator, in accordance with ENSDF policy.) Note that the theoretical value from 2005KiZW is 1.187, with an estimated uncertainty of 1.4%. The listed subshell coefficients have been scaled up from the calculated ones to be consistent with the adopted |a value. 
EKC,K/T$From 1962Lu03, |a(K)exp=0.635~{I16} and ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.531~{I7} 
$K/L=1.54~{I3}, an average of 1.51~{I3} (1957Ke08) and 1.57~{I5} (1966Ja02). 
$L1/L2/L3 L1:L2:L3=1.00:2.69~{I8}:2.46~{I6}, from 1957Ke08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$From the adopted values. The listed subshell coefficients do not include a contribution from the E0 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From 1996Al31, |g|g(|q). The other value consistent with the |g|g(|q) data implies a sizable M1 component, which has been rejected on physical grounds. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$2004BeZQ list I|g=0.0390~{I20} for a 267.44 |g, which the evaluator assumes represents a doublet consisting of this |g and the 267.54 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(E2,M1)
decay_comment:
E,M$From 2004Ku13. Evaluator associates this with the 422.1 |g, which is unplaced in 2004BeZQ. 2004BeZQ report I|g=0.0063~{I26} for the 422.1 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$2004BeZQ list I|g=0.0390~{I20} for a 267.44 |g, which the evaluator assumes represents a doublet consisting of this |g and the 267.46 |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$From 2004BeZQ. 2004Ku13 place a 293.26~{I22} |g from this level, but this is a poor energy fit. The evaluator associates the 295.7 |g with this 293.26 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Poor energy fit. In 2004BeZQ, a 1522~{I1} |g is listed, but is placed from a 1894.7 level, whose existence 2004Ku13 do not confirm. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$In 2004BeZQ, a 229.01 |g is listed, but is placed from |a 1276.6 level, whose existence 2004Ku13 do not confirm. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$This value gives I(|g+ce)(123)=796~{I120} units. A more precise value of 851~{I24} is obtained from the feeding of this level, with the reasonable assumption that there is no |e+|b{++} feeding. 
CC$Calculated value. From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay, this value is measured to be 1.197~{I14}. See the comment there on this value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$Deduced from |a(K)exp=0.044~{I3}. See the Adopted Gammas data set. 
MR$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g placed by 1975So03 to this activity and level, but other |g's from this level are not seen and no feeding of it is observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.017 {I1}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I1}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (3.0 {I3}) for 2934.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.025 {I3}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I1}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (3.0 {I3}) for 2934.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.005 {I5}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I1}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (3.0 {I3}) for 2934.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.027 {I1}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I1}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (3.0 {I3}) for 2934.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.031 {I11}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.00 {I11}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (6.6 {I4}) for 2949.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.049 {I18}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.00 {I11}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (6.6 {I4}) for 2949.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.040 {I2}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.00 {I11}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (6.6 {I4}) for 2949.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.036 {I11}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.00 {I11}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (6.6 {I4}) for 2949.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.016 {I5}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.00 {I11}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (6.6 {I4}) for 2949.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.0146 {I26}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I2}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (1.5 {I2}) for 3090.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.060 {I4}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I2}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (1.5 {I2}) for 3090.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.071 {I7}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I2}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (1.5 {I2}) for 3090.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from branching ratio for this transition (0.26 {I2}) (2014BeZX), and branching ratio (1.000 {I9}) (2014BeZX) and relative intensity (0.6 {I2}) for 3122.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$This value gives I(|g+ce)(123)=550~{I100} units. A more precise value of 601~{I56} is obtained from the feeding of this level, with the reasonable assumption that there is no |e+|b{++} feeding. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$Theoretical value since |a(K)exp indicates negligible E0 component. 
MR$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Value may include I|g of 124.4|g from 1770 level. 
$A{-2}=+0.05 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I00} (1965Ej01) 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I8} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.100 {I17}, A{-4}=0.046 {I24} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.01 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
MR$0.00 {I97} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$0.0827 {I119} (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.031 {I4} (1965Ej01) 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.26 {I1}, A{-4}=0.057 {I18} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.009 {I+22-26} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.02 {I11}, A{-p}=0.15 {I10} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$0.0306, normalized to theoretical value (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I6} (1965Ej01) 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.077 {I16} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.009 {I+11-13} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.01 {I10}, A{-p}=0.15 {I5} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$996.36 {I17} (1994Wu01), 996.13 {I14} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=0.046 {I60} (1978We08) 
MR$0.00 {I89} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.95 {I4} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.009 {I49}, A{-4}=-0.037 {I24} (1978We08) 
M$|a(K)exp > |a(K)(M1) > |a(K)(M1+E2) > |a(K)(E2) signals E0 component 
EKC$0.040 {I4} (1974Go30) 
MR$2.9 {I+210-90} (1978We08) 
$A{-2}=0.013 {I29}, A{-4}=-0.166 {I38}, A{-p}=-0.153 {I52} (1982Da12) 
MR$-3.53 {I+83-100} (1982Da12) 
$R(DCO)=0.85 {I12}, A{-p}=-0.04 {I10} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I5} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.2 {I+13-27} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.88 {I30}, A{-p}=0.11 {I20} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$756.66 {I8} (1994Wu01), 756.67 {I14} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I58} (1978We08) 
MR$0.16 {I+22-19} or 21 {I+|@-17} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.88 {I3}, A{-p}=-0.05 {I2} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$1004.80 {I8} (1994Wu01), 1004.60 {I13} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=0.092 {I20} (1978We08) 
MR$-6.0 {I+11-16} (1978We08) 
$A{-2}=-0.042 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I36}, A{-p}=0.156 {I58} (1982Da12) 
MR$6.14 {I+169-237} (1982Da12) 
$R(DCO)=0.93 {I2}, A{-p}=-0.05 {I4} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(427.0+427.8)=52.4~{I26} 
EKC$0.0170 {I22} (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.059 {I1} (1965Ej01) 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.32 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.079 {I15} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.004 {I11} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.00 {I10}, A{-p}=0.14 {I15} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1982Da12 
$A{-2}=-0.181 {I34}, A{-4}=-0.066 {I46}, A{-p}=0.435 {I112} (1982Da12) 
MR$-0.049 {I+27} (1982Da12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$892.62 {I12} (1994Wu01), 892.64 {I13} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=-0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I20} (1978We08) 
MR$-1.96 {I+78-115} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.91 {I3}, A{-p}=-0.13 {I5} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I17} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.091 {I90} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.004 {I+70-66} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.99 {I10}, A{-p}=0.12 {I10} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp > |a(K)(M1) > |a(K)(M1+E2) > |a(K)(E2) signals E0 component 
EKC$0.039 {I7} (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I13} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.084 {I19} (1978We08) 
$A{-p}=-0.05 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
MR$1.30 {I+21-18} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=0.041 {I56} (1978We08) 
MR$0.04 {I+21-23} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.95 {I20}, A{-p}=0.03 {I10} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$|g observed by 1978We08 and placed by evaluator. 
$A{-2}=-0.312 {I40}, A{-4}=-0.100 {I50}, A{-p}=0.433 {I112} (1982Da12) 
MR$0.012 {I+33-12} (1982Da12) 


