# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.021 {I5} (1974ViZS) indicates M1+E2 with |d=1.5 {I4}. See comments in adopted gammas. Evaluator assign from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0015 {I4} (1974ViZS). 
Placement in level scheme by 1970Pl01. From |a(K)exp 1974ViZS suggest that |g is E1 and does not place it in level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.26 {I6}, K/L12=4.3 {I6}, L12/M12=3.3 {I5} (1974ViZS); other: |a(K)exp=0.145 (1970Pl01), K/L1=9.8 (1958Br88). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from Ice(K)=0.220 {I15} (1974ViZS) and |a(K)=0.176 {I13} 
M,MR K/L12=5.7 {I7}, L1/L2=9.0 {I2} (1974ViZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI intensity divided on the basis of coincidence data (1974ViZS) 
M |a(K)exp=0.046 {I12} for the multiplet (1974ViZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I21} (1974ViZS). Theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00327, |a(K)(E2)=0.00840. |a(K)exp indicates E1, but level scheme requires M1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI intensity division on the basis of |g|g data (1974ViZS) 
M |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I8} for the multiplet (1974ViZS). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00279 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI intensity division based on |g|g data, I|g(multiplet)=0.30 {I10} (1974ViZS) 
M |a(K)exp=0.014 {I6} for the multiplet (1974ViZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(45|')/I|g(90|')=1.77 
E$2014Th02 (p,2n|g) measure a 668.4 keV {i2} |g ray in |g|g spectra and do not find any signature of a doublet (without a broadened peak width) in coincidence with 550.6|g. Evaluator considers 669.8|g same as 668.4|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1979Go15), A{-2}=+0.28 {I2} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.41 (1974Tj02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I8} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.19 (1974Tj02) 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.172 (1974Tj02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.053 {I11} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0489 A{-2}=+0.18 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I9} (1977Go12,1979Go15); A{-2}=+0.25 {I6} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.43 (1974Tj02) 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.342 (1974Tj02) 
MR from |g(|q) (1977Go12), |d not reported in 1979Go15. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.035 {I8} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0320 A{-2}=+0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I8} (1977Go12,1979Go15); A{-2}=+0.28 {I5} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.49 (1974Tj02) 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.068 (1974Tj02) 
MR from |g(|q) (1977Go12) (mistakenly shown as |d of 720.0|g in table 1 of 1977Go12), |d not reported in 1979Go15. Adopted |d=1.5 {I+10-5} from {+193}Hg decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.065 {I13} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0583, |a(K)(E2)=0.0162; A{-2}=+0.28 {I5} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.19 (1974Tj02) 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.143 (1974Tj02) 
MR adopted |d=1.4 {I+12-5} from {+193}Hg decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00877, |a(K)(M1)=0.0270; A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1979Go15); A{-2}=+0.26 {I3} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.17 (1974Tj02) 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.413 (1974Tj02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.043 {I9} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0326, |a(K)(E2)=0.0102; I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.23 (1974Tj02). Data suggests a M1, |DJ=1 transition, level scheme requires E2 multipolarity. Possibly a doublet with the major component the 668.2|g from the 2087-keV 21/2- level. 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.135 (1974Tj02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0075 {I15} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00637; A{-2}=-0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1979Go15); A{-2}=-0.26 {I2} (1975LaYS); I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=0.94 (1974Tj02) 
RI I|g/I|g(407.6)=0.229 (1974Tj02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} (1979Go15) 
Stretched octupole character inferred from |g(|q). The partial T{-1/2} for the 1947.0 level via 1249.3|g (=50 ns) is low relative to the Weisskopf single-particle estimate for E3 (=116 ns). E3 is nevertheless preferable to other assignments (1979Go15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1979Go15), A{-2}=+0.30 {I5} (1975LaYS) 
M prompt decay of 2079.8 level (2.51 ns) consistent with E2 assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.014 {I3} (1975LaYS); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00802, |a(K)(M1)=0.0241; A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1979Go15); A{-2}=+0.33 {I4} (1975LaYS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)=0.72 {I20} (1979Go15); theory: |a(M1)=0.579, |a(E2)=0.192; A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} (1979Go15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)=0.97 {I20} (1979Go15); theory: |a(E2)=0.792, |a(E1)=0.123, |a(M1)=1.84; A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1979Go15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$Other possible value of -0.07 {I5} is ruled out by 2014Th02 from comparison with previous ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$According to e-mail reply of Jan 17, 2014 from T. Thomas, value of |d should be +0.44 {I+22-19} as in authors' table 6, if |d(381|g)=-2.93 is correct. Value of |d=+0.22 {I+22-19} listed in authors' table 1 should be disregarded. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$Other possible value of +0.35 {I8} is ruled out by 2014Th02 from comparison with previous ce data of 1974ViZS ({+193}Hg |e Decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$From Figure caption A.2. A value of |d=-0.20 {I13} in Table 1 is a misprint (communications with 1st Author) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=+0.28 {I17} for J(1477)=9/2, +0.47 {I8} for J(1477)=11/2; |d(O/Q)=+0.02 {I9} for J(1477)=13/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 137.17 {I10} from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms), 137.0 {I1} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), and 137.0 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) and |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 170.78 {I10} from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms), 170.8 {I1} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), and 170.6 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms). 
M,MR$from ce data in {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) (1977Pa20), with sign of |d from |g(|q) in 1977Pa20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 128.57 {I10} from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms), 128.4 {I1} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), and 128.6 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and (|a,3n|g). Others: 100 {I50} from (p,n|g), and 100 {I16} from (p,2n|g); 100 from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 162.22 {I12} from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms), 162.3 {I1} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), and 162.2 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37.0 {I30} from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms), 35.0 {I21} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), 37.8 {I19} from (|a,3n|g), and 36 {I4} from (p,2n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) (1977Pa20), with sign of |d from |g(|q) in 1977Pa20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,3n|g). Others: 69.0 {I7} from {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) and 69.0 {I7} from (p,2n|g) 
E$from ce data in (|a,3n|g). Other: 69.0 {I7} from ce data in {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) 
M$from ce data in (|a,3n|g) and {+194}Au IT decay (420 ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 201.8 {I3} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 202.5 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,3n|g). Other: <14 from ({+7}Li,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 364.7 {I2} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), 364.8 {I5} from (|a,3n|g), and 364.54 {I18} from (p,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 100 {I36} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 142.9 {I1} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 143.0 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,3n|g). in ({+7}Li,5n|g), a 279.3|g is placed from 888, (10+) to 609, (9+) level, inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole suggested by |g(|q) data in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 313.6 {I2} from ({+7}Li,5n|g), 313.3 {I3} from (|a,3n|g), and 313.2 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) (|DJ=1) in ({+7}Li,5n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) and (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 221.7 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 85 {I7} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 79 {I11} from (|a,3n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) in ({+7}Li,5n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 364.5 {I2} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 364.6 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 100 {I15} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 193.0 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 100 {I25} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 414.3 {I3} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 414.5 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 55 {I5} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 34 {I7} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 492.3 {I5} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 492.7 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 83 {I6} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 82 {I18} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 685.4 {I3} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 685.0 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 223.4 {I2} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 222.6 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 24 {I4} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 36 {I14} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 715.7 {I3} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 715.1 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 100 {I27} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 343.0 {I2} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 343.2 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: <36 from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 1058.3 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 436.3 {I4} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and 436.5 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,5n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g); |g|g(ADO) in ({+7}Li,5n|g) consistent with |DJ=0 or 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 35.19 {I7} (1977Pa20) and 35.27 {I8} (1975Ya14) 
RI$from 1977Pa20. Other: 80 {I23} from 1975Ya14 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=32 {I5} (1977Pa20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 45.32 {I7} (1977Pa20) and 45.25 {I9} (1975Ya14) 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=13.4 {I12} (1977Pa20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
E$from ce data in 1977Pa20 
RI$from ce(L)(26.9|g)/ce(L)(45.3|g)=1.03 {I13} (1977Pa20) and mult=M2. Others: 0.24 {I5} from I(|g+ce) balance at 80 level, <0.5 from |g-ray measurements (1977Pa20) 
M$|a(L)exp>2400 (1977Pa20) rules out mult=D,E2. The intensity balance at 80.5 level restricts multipolarity to M2, E3, M3 or M4. The upper limits on B(EL)(W.u.) rule out M4. The M3 is less likely since B(M3)(W.u.)=9.1 is very close to RUL=10 for M3. The M2 assignment is chosen simply because of preference of 5+ for 107-keV isomer rather than 6+. A similar 5+ isomer reported in {+192}Au (1977Pa20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 137.16 {I10} (1977Pa20) and 137.20 {I14} (1975Ya14) 
RI$from 1977Pa20. Other: 65 {I5} (1975Ya14) 
M$from |a(L)exp=0.78 {I9}, |a(K)exp<1.2 (1977Pa20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$existence of transition required by intensity balance at 245 and 278 levels. Energy deduced from level energy difference. 
RI$deduced from weighted average of I(|g+ce) balance at 245 (I(|g+ce) (33.6|g)=81 {I13}) and 278 (I(|g+ce)(33.6|g)=53 {I19}) levels, with theoretical |a{-T} calculated by the BrIcc code 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 170.78 {I10} (1977Pa20) and 170.77 {I12} (1975Ya14) 
RI$from 1977Pa20. Other: 102 {I7} (1975Ya14) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=1.07 {I13}, |a(L)exp=0.24 {I5} (1977Pa20). Sign(|d) from |g(|q) in 1977Pa20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 128.58 {I10} (1977Pa20) and 128.55 {I12} (1975Ya14) 
M$from |a(L)exp=1.12 {I8} (1977Pa20), relative to a known E2 transition from {+133}Ba; |a(K)exp<0.9 normalized to theoretical |a(L)=1.08 for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Pa20. Other: 162.22 {I16} (1975Ya14) 
RI$from 1977Pa20. Other: 36 {I4} (1975Ya14) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.65 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.32 {I8} (1977Pa20). Sign(|d) from |g(|q) in 1977Pa20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E$from ce data in 1977Pa20 
RI$from ce(L)(69|g)/ce(L)(128.6|g)=2.69 {I28} (1977Pa20) and mult=E3. Others: 0.39 {I5} from I(|g+ce) balance at 407 level; <10 from |g-ray spectrum (1977Pa20) 
M$L/(M+N)=2.2 {I3} and |a(L)exp>26 (1977Pa20) rule out mult=D,E2; E3 proposed by 1982Ne05 based on their ce data (not explicitly given). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 170.7 (1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 121 {I5} (1975La21) and 106 {I8} (1982Ne05) 
M$M1 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 128.6 (1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 110 {I5} (1975La21) and 97 {I8} (1982Ne05) 
M$E2 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 162.1 (1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 40.5 {I20} (1975La21) and 36 {I6} (1982Ne05) 
M$M1 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 291.3 (not assigned by 1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 12.0 {I11} (1975La21) and 8 {I3} (1982Ne05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 142.8 (1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 40.8 {I20} (1975La21) and 42 {I3} (1982Ne05) 
M$M1/E2 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$In ({+7}Li,5n|g), this |g is placed from 888, (10+) level to 609, 9+ level, which is inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole from 279|g(|q) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 313.2 (not assigned by 1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 15.2 {I15} (1975La21) and 14 {I3} (1982Ne05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 231.8 (not assigned by 1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 5.6 {I7} (1975La21) and 6 {I3} (1982Ne05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 221.5 (1975La21) 
RI$other: 58 {I3} in 1975La21 could be for the doublet 
M$M1/E2 in 1982Ne05 
$|g(|q) for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 364.5 (not assigned by 1975La21) 
RI$other: 58 {I4} in 1975La21 could be for the doublet 
M$E2 in 1982Ne05 
$|g(|q) for 364.8+364.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 192.9 (1975La21) 
RI$unweighted average of 51.3 {I22} (1975La21) and 31 {I6} (1982Ne05) 
M$M1/E2 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 414.4 (not assigned by 1975La21) 
RI$unweighted average of 10.4 {I17} (1975La21) and 17 {I3} (1982Ne05) 
M$E2 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 436.5 (not assigned by 1975La21) 
RI$weighted average of 13.0 {I17} (1975La21) and 8 {I3} (1982Ne05) 
$|g(|q) for a superimposed line, as it is inconsistent with |DJ=1, M1+E2 in 1982Ne05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g data of 1971Er03, 1974Fa06, 1973Vi09, and I(ce) data of 1973Vi09 and adopted conversion coefficients. 
T{-1/2}(200|g)>1 ms, <1 s (1974PoZQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI from I|g and |a 
|a(K)exp: 0.35 {I5} (1967Fr05), 0.27 {I3} (1955Jo22). Other: {+195}Hg |e decay 
MR -0.39 {I3} (1978DeZE) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
TI from weighted average from I(ce) data for 318|g relative to the 261|g and 56|g from 1973Vi09 and I|g/I|g(261|g) data of 1973Vi09 1971Fr03, 1966Ha47, and 1974Fa06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=1.18 {I11}, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=6.3 {I3} other |a(K)exp: 1.10 {I6} (1971Fr03), 0.96 {I10} (1970Ca07). 
MR from |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=100 {I9}:11.5 {I14}:2.4 {I7} (1973Vi09), 100:11.8 {I18}:|?2 (1971Fr03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
TI$from adopted branching ratio and intensity balance at 318 level. 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Other I|g=0.003 {I2} (1974Fa06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
TI$from adopted branching ratio and intensity balance at 318 level. 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Others: 0.016 {I3} (1966Ha47), 0.022 {I11} (1974Fa06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.042 {I4}, |a(K)exp/|a(L12)exp=6.1 {I6}. Other |a(K)exp: 0.048 {I7} (1971Fr03), 0.043 {I4} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 
MR from A{-2}=+0.170 {I23} (1970Ca07). Other |d|?0.33 from |a(K)exp=0.042 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.0245 {I24}, |a(K)exp/|a(L12)exp=6.6 {I8}; other |a(K)exp: 0.022 {I2} (1971Fr03), 0.020 {I2} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
CC doublet |a(K)exp=0.0121 {I23}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0029 {I7}; other |a(K)exp: 0.010 {I2} (1970Ca07,1971Fr03,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.0182 {I30}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0043 {I13}; other |a(K)exp: 0.0165 {I25} (1971Fr03), 0.021 {I2} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI doublet apportioned via |g|g-coin is inconsistent; I|g(841|g to g.s.)=43% (1974Fa06,1971Fr03), 61% (1973Vi09,1970Ca07) of I|g composite 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0114 {I28}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0025 {I11}; other |a(K)exp: 0.007 {I3} (1971Fr03), 0.0077 {I16} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.0112 {I11}, |a(L)exp=0.0040 {I7}, E(L1+L2)C/|a(L3)exp=7.3 {I20}; other |a(K)exp: 0.015 {I2} (1971Fr03), 0.011 {I1} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI$authors quote 0.921 {I17}. The evaluator assumes that the uncertainty is a misprint. 
|a(K)exp=0.0088 {I23} 
MR from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.0118 {I24}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0021 {I6} (1973Vi09); other |a(K)exp: 0.0072 {I14} (1971Fr03), 0.0079 {I8} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 
MR from A{-2}=+0.22 {I5} (1970Ca07). Other |d|?0.66 from |a(K)exp=0.0118 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.0110 {I13}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0020 {I3} (1973Vi09); other |a(K)exp: 0.0074 {I14} (1971Fr03), 0.0092 {I10} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.0090 {I3}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0013 {I3} (1973Vi09); other |a(K)exp: 0.0061 {I12} (1971Fr03), 0.0071 {I14} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$authors quote 0.272 {I9}. The evaluator assumes that the uncertainty is a misprint. 
|a(K)exp=0.04 {I2} (1971Fr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=100:99 {I6}:87 {I4} (1970Fo08), 100:96 {I10}:75 {I10} (1971Fr03), 100 {I6}:92 {I6}:94 {I6} (1973Vi09). |a(M1)exp:|a(M2)exp:|a(M3)exp=89 {I11}:100:91 {I9} (1971Fr03), 97 {I7}:100 {I8}:92 {I7} (1973Vi09). |a(L)exp:|a(M)exp:|a(N)exp:|a(O+...)exp=100 {I6}:24.4 {I19}:6.5 {I5}:2.3 {I3} (1973Vi09). 
MR from L-subshell ratios (1970Fo08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(L)exp=0.151 {I23}, |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=37 {I13}:100 {I9}:58 {I9}. Other |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=45 {I19}:100 {I31}:70 {I31} (1970Fo08,1971Fr03,1958Br88) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Fa06. Others: 436 {I27} (1973Vi09), 434 {I40} (1971Fr03), 430 {I25} (1966Ha47) 
CC |a(K)exp=0.352 {I24}; |a(L)exp=0.073 {I7}; |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=100 {I5}:19.9 {I14}:6.2 {I5} (1973Vi09), 100:19.5 {I20}:7.0 {I15} (1971Fr03), 100 {I8}:20 {I6}:6.5 {I14} (1970Fo08). 
MR from L-subshell ratios (1973Vi09,1971Fr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI from ce(L)=436 {I18} (1973Vi09), |a(L)=2416. Others: I|g=0.187 calc from I(|g+ce) balance at 262 level, 0.31 {I10} (1974Fa06) 
CC measured total I(ce)=598 {I29} (1973Vi09), |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp:|a(M2)exp:|a(M3)exp:3|a(N):|a(O+...)exp=1 \.8 {I2}:100 {I4}:91 {I4}:28 {I2}:25 {I2}:12.8 {I9}:4.5 {I4} (1973Vi09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI others: 0.30 {I4} (1973Vi09), 0.24 {I3} (1971Fr03,1966Ha47) 
CC |a(K)exp=5.4 {I11}, |a(L)exp=4.1 {I10}, |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=100 {I11}:31 {I4}:67 {I8}. Other |a(K)exp: 6.5 {I10} (1970Ca07), 8 {I2} (1971Fr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.153 {I18}, |a(L)exp=0.149 {I20}; |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=34 {I4}:100 {I8}:58 {I5} (1973Vi09), 29 {I5}:100:56 {I8} (1971Fr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.031 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0124 {I24}, |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=78 {I10}:100 {I11}:42 {I7}; other |a(K)exp: 0.042 {I8} (1971Fr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.055 {I5}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0095 {I10} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.055 {I5} (1971Fr03), 0.049 {I5} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.17 {I3}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.030 {I6} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.135 {I26} (1971Fr03), 0.11 {I1} (1970Ca07), 0.15 {I2} (1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.039 {I7}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0055 {I12} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.031 {I5} (1966Ha47), 0.04 {I1} (1970Ca07), 0.05 {I2} (1971Fr03). 
MR from |a(K)exp=0.039 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.16 {I4}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.029 {I9} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.18 {I4} (1971Fr03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.012 {I3}. Other |a(K)exp: 0.012 {I2} (1966Ha47), 0.015 {I2} (1970Ca07), 0.011 {I3} (1971Fr03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.096 {I9}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.015 {I2} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.11 {I3} (1971Fr03), 0.083 {I12} (1966Ha47). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.068 {I6}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.012 {I2} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.064 {I12} (1971Fr03), 0.063 {I6} (1970Ca07,1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.035 {I4}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0069 {I13} (1973Vi09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.038 {I19} (1971Fr03), 0.023 {I3} (1966Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$I|g=0.61 {I22} for E|g=898.8 {I3} corresponds to 897-899 doublet (1973Vi09) 
|a(K)exp=0.0067 {I36} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI$total relative intensity of 8.90 {I9} (2015Do01) divided by compiler based on intensity ratio of 0.75 {I8} between the two components as given in {+195}Hg |e decay (10.53 h) dataset in ENSDF database. Uncertainty of |?10% on this ratio is not used here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$6 for 162.7|g and 16 for 208.3|g in figure 12 of 2000Gr32 are misprints confirmed by e-mail in July 2001 from one of the authors (Guenther) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
Intensity imbalance at the 232.5 level supports an E2 admixture. 
MR from 1982Ha04. |d{+2}<0.025 (1967Wa02). 
HF(M1)=1.8|*10{+4}, HF(E2)=0.020. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
CC E3 |a(theory)'s multiplied by 0.975 {I10} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:(M4+M5):(N+O)=<10:18:450:340:100:85:6:65 (1967Wa02); |a(exp)=240 {I50} (1971Ro16). See 9.7 h isomer decay. 
HF=160 wu; B(E3)=1.4|*10{+-5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
CC E3 |a(theory)'s mult. By 0.975 {I10} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:(M4+M5):(N+O)=<10:18:450:340:100:85:6:65 (1967Wa02); |a(exp)=240 {I50} (1971Ro16). 
TI from I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(147|g+285|g+316|g). |SIce=1151. 
HF=160 wu, B(E3)=1.4|*10{+-5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M K:L1:L2:L3:M:(N+O)=160:25:165:110:100:25; M1/E2<0.03, A{-2}=-0.046 {I65} from |g|g(|q) supports E2 (1967Wa02). 
B(E2)=0.23 from T{-1/2}; HF=0.030 wu. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K:L1:L3:M=340 {I60}:60:2:15; E2/M1=0.05 {I+9-2} (1967Wa02). An intensity imbalance at the 232.5 level supports an E2 admixture. 
MR from 1982Ha04. |d{+2}<0.025 (1967Wa02). 
HF(M1)=1.8|*10{+4}, HF(E2)=0.020. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
CC M4 |a(theory)'s mult. By 0.975 {I5} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M3:(M4+M5):(N+O)=265:220:50:340:75:110:13:70 (1967Wa02); |a(exp)=250 {I40} (1971Ro16). 
HF(M4)=0.23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$(391|g)(228|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.23 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I11} 
$(391|g)(234|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.03 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$1.535 {I228} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(84.7)/I|g(188.2|g)=1.68 {I153}, 2.20 {I38}, 8.29 {I449}, 1.332 {I215} and 1.201 {I742}. I|g(84.69)/I|g(188.2|g)=1.535 {I230} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$126.14 {I81} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(147.8)/I|g(188.2|g)=124.05 {I127}, 129.53 {I100}, 126.43 {I148}, 131.45 {I194}, 132.24 {I278}, 123.98 {I178}, 123.94 {I76} and 126.16 {I54}. I|g(147.8)/I|g(188.2|g)=126.14 {I147} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24. Compiler's note: reduced |h{+2}=5.2 is larger than the critical |h{+2}=2.0 at 95% confidence level, implying that uncertainty on the weighted average may be underestimated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Placement in this decay proposed by 2020Mo24 based on in-beam |g-ray study by 2000Gr32: Phys. Rev. C 62, 064304 
RI$3.021 {I65} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(263.8)/I|g(188.2|g)=2.940 {I229}, 3.084 {I188}, 2.897 {I306}, 2.794 {I341}, 2.788 {I388}, 3.335 {I342}, 2.738 {I190} and 3.094 {I87}. I|g(263.8)/I|g(188.2|g)=3.021 {I70} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 
M$M1 and E2 in 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$4.525 {I102} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(137.7)/I|g(188.2|g)=4.413 {I328}, 4.4737 {I281}, 4.241 {I442}, 4.890 {I645}, 4.823 {I1201}, 5.186 {I671}, 4.511 {I176} and 4.456 {I175}. I|g(137.7)/I|g(188.2|g)=4.525 {I115} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$11.623 {I140} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(285.5)/I|g(188.2|g)=11.687 {I258}, 12.239 {I247}, 11.649 {I355}, 10.667 {I466}, 11.421 {I524}, 11.295 {I407}, 10.881 {I268} and 11.706 {I116}. I|g(285.5)/I|g(188.2|g)=11.623 {I172} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24. Compiler's note: reduced |h{+2}=2.8 is somewhat larger than the critical |h{+2}=2.0 at 95% confidence level 
M$E2 in 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$17.36 {I14} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(168.4)/I|g(188.2|g)=17.20 {I46}, 17.72 {I37}, 17.51 {I69}, 17.63 {I84}, 16.83 {I84}, 18.42 {I81}, 17.03 {I30} and 17.36 {I20}. I|g(168.4)/I|g(188.2|g)=17.36 {I18} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$8.050 {I119} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(316.2)/I|g(188.2|g)=8.008 {I268}, 8.675 {I262}, 8.065 {I386}, 7.471 {I469}, 7.349 {I483}, 7.930 {I380}, 7.435 {I248} and 8.131 {I102}. I|g(316.2)/I|g(188.2|g)=8.050 {I141} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24. Compiler's note: reduced |h{+2}=2.3 is slightly larger than the critical |h{+2}=2.0 at 95% confidence level 
M$M1 and E2 in 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$2020Mo24 determined multipolarity M1 from measured K-x ray intensities and gamma-ray intensities in two different analysis methods: 100% M1 in one method and |?75% M1 in the other. In Table 20, authors list M1 and E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$1.274 {I86} from weighted average of I|g(174.9)/I|g(188.2|g)=1.210 {I247}, 1.422 {I254}, 1.421 {I469}, 1.518 {I793}, 1.138 {I185} and 1.299 {I120}. Same values in authors' Tables 8 and 20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I(K| x ray+77|g)=550 {I50} minus I(K| x ray)=85 (1965He04); others: 330 {I3} (1965Ha15), 488 {I43} (1974HeYW) 
MR from L-subshell ratios (1959Va13,1972Pa40) via {+197}Hg decay 
L1:L2:L3=100:42 {I7}:35 {I8} (1967Ba63), 100:51 {I1}:37 {I1} (1971Kr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from (L1+L2)/L3=66 {I5} (1970Sh10, {+197}Hg decay) 
L1:L2:L3=100:9.3 {I5}:1.4 {I3} (1966Ga07) 
K:L1:L2=608 {I8}:100:7.8 {I1} (1971Kr06), K/L=5.9 {I2} (1966Ga07) 
|a(K)exp=0.93 {I20} (1965He04). Others: 1964Po05, 1965Ha15, 1971Kr06, 1973Ba66 
I(ce) L-subshell spectrum (1973Ba66) conflicts with others 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0821, |a(L)=0.0469, |a(M)=0.01186, |a(N+..)=0.00370, |a=0.1446 if mult=E2 
|a(K)=0.1061, |a(L)=0.0483, |a(M)=0.0121, |a(N+..)=0.0038, |a=0.15 if mult=E2(+M1), |d=3.4 
RI from 1965He04. Others: 4.9 {I10} (1974HeYW), 7 {I1} (1965Ha15) 
MR from (L1+L2)/L3=2.8 {I3} (1970Sh10, {+197}Hg decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E obscured by 129.8|g via {+195}Pt IT decay 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a 
TI from intensity balance at the 279 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) (1971Mc14), Coul. ex. other: -0.34 {I4} from (130|g)(279|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.299 {I12} (1956Ka09) 
|a(K)exp=0.32 {I4}, |a(exp)=0.44 {I10} (1966Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average from 77.345 {I8} (1963Ma08) cryst and 77.352 {I2}(1974HeYW) semi 
MR from L-subshell ratio data (1959Va13,1972Pa40), sign from Mossbauer 
L1:L2:L3=100:44 {I4}:33 {I2} (1959Va13), 100:44 {I3}:35 {I2} (1972Pa40). Others: 1953Mi22, 1955Jo22, 1961Ju05, 1970Pl05 
M1:M2:M3=100:44 {I4}:41 {I4} (1972Pa40). Others: 1959Va13 
|a(L)exp=2.5 (1951Hu17), 2.5 {I3} (1976Re13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1974HeYW. Other: 191.39 {I5} (1972Wi21) 
RI from 1979He12. Others: 3.7 {I4} (1967Bu22), 2.69 {I25} (1974HeYW), 2.9 {I4} from (ce(K) 191|g)/(ce(L) 77|g)=1.6 {I2}/185 (1961Ju05) 
MR from (L1+L2)/L3=66 {I5} (1970Sh10) 
K/L=5.87 {I20} (1970Sh10), L1:L2:L3=100:9.5 {I4}:2.7 {I4} (1967Ba44) 
|a(K)exp=0.90 {I10} (1955Jo22). Others: 1960Fe03, 1965He04, 1967Ba44 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0821, |a(L)=0.0470, |a(M)=0.01187, |a(N+..)=0.00370, |a=0.1447 if mult=E2 
|a(K)=0.1061, |a(L)=0.0483, |a(M)=0.01209, |a(N+..)=0.00377, |a=0.1702 if mult=E2(+M1), |d=3.4 
E from 1974HeYW. Other: 268.75 {I5} (1972Wi21) 
RI from 1979He12. Others: 0.26 {I8} (1967Bu22), 0.21 {I4} (1974HeYW) 
MR from (L1+L2)/L3=2.8 {I3} (1970Sh10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other: 201.6 {I3} (1971Mc14, Coul. ex.) 
RI from 1965Ha15. Others (Coul. ex.): 1.42 (1970Sh12), 1.50 {I12} (1971Mc14) 
M from |g(|q) 1971Mc14, Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other: 279.01 {I5} (1972Wi21) semi 
MR from |g(|q) 1971Mc14, Coul. ex. Other: 0.45 {I4} from L1:L2:L3 (1970Pl05) 
L1:L2:L3=100:17.9 {I27}:4.8 {I7} (1970Pl05); K/L=5.3 (1955Jo22), 4.8 {I5} (1970Sh10) 
|a(K)exp=0.29 {I3} (1955Jo22). Other: 1965He04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E others: 130.2 (1953Mi22,1959Va13), 130.42 {I7} (1972Wi21) 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. Others: 4.4 {I3} (1966Sm01, {+197}Au IT decay), |?3.5 (1970Pl05) 
L1:L2:L3=5.6 {I17}:100:61 {I6} (1970Pl05), L2/L3=1.3 {I1} (1959Va13), K/L=0.11 (1955Jo22) 
TI from intensity balance at the 279 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_comment:
RI other: 0.12 {I3} from ce(K)(409|g,M4)/ce(L)(279|g, M1+E2)=0.054 {I11} 
|a(K)exp=2.0 {I8} (1970Pl05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E|g (1963Ma08,1974HeYW), |d (1975Pr09) from (|g,|g) Mossbauer 
1974Ul01 studied |a(exp) dependence on neutral vs +10 charge {+197}Au 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0821, |a(L)=0.0470, |a(M)=0.01186, |a(N+..)=0.00370,|a=0.1446 if mult=E2 
|a(K)=0.1060, |a(L)=0.0483, |a(M)=0.01208, |a(N+..)=0.00377, |a=0.1702 if mult=E2(+M1), |d=3.4 
E from {+197}Hg |e decay (64.14 h) 
RI calculated from I|g-branching ratio via {+197}Hg |e decay 
MR from L1+L2/L3=2.8 {I3} (1970Sh10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972Wi21 ({+197}Hg |e decay) 
MR others: -0.41 {I4} (1958Mc02), -0.33 {I9} (1958Ma36), -0.40 {I4} (1971Mc14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from |DE(levels) established by (268.5|g)(279|g)-coin (1971Mc14) 
RI |DJ=0 component subtracted from I|g doublet 
MR from |g(|q) (1971Mc14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: (n,n'|g) 457.7 {I3} (1971Ba29), 457.9 {I3} (1971Ne01) 
Placement based on ({+58}Ni,{+58}Ni'|g) (1988St16) and (d,d'), (n,n'), (n,n'|g) excitations 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1988St16 and 1981Ve12. Others: (n,n'|g) 1971Ba29, 577.1 {I4} (1971Ne01) 
Placement from 1988St16 and 1981Ve12. Other: 1979Bo10 based on (d,d'), (n,n'), (n,n'|g) excited states 
M other |g(|q) measurement: 1981Ve12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$ intensity not determined due to overlap with 511 annihilation peak. The palcement from 1059.7 level is from |g|g coin evidence 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$listed as 728.4 in text (page 2) of 2005Fo06 
RI$not determined because of contamination from an impurity; placement from 1277 level is from |g|g coin evidence 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
50.5|g would not have been seen experimentally since it is expected to have a large conversion coefficient 
TI From I(|g+ce) value of 333.82|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_comment:
E From 1973Pa08 
RI From I(|g+ce) and |a 
I|g(exp)<1.5 (1973Pa08) 
ce(L)=99 {I14}, |a(L)=1670 (1973Pa08). 
M M3, M4, E4 from |a(L)exp>56; M3 ruled out from no evidence of ce(K); B(M4)(W.u.)=0.31 is consistent with B(M4)(W.u.)=0.24 ({+196}Au), 0.48 ({+195}Au), 0.25 ({+198}Tl) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$direct measurement by 1969Ok02, deduced from ce spectra of 1967Ba45 
RI$average of 9 {I3} (1966Pr05) and 11.5 {I30} (calculated from ce intensity of 1967Ba45) 
M,MR$deduced from L1:L2:L3=100:27 {I5}:14 {I4} (1967Ba63) 
$ ICE(L)=30 (1967Ba45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=317.17 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.194 {I15} (1970Ba37), 0.194 {I25} (1967Ba45), |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02); other: |a(K)exp=0.186 {I23} (1969Ok02); K/L=5.4 {I6} (1969Ok02), 5 {I1} (1966Pr05). 
$ ICE(K)=6.3 7 (1967Ba45,1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.45 {I4} (1970Ba37); other: |a(K)exp=0.48 {I8} (1967Ba45), -0.50<|d<0.22 from |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02); K/L=4.5 {I10} (1966Pr05) 
$ ICE(K)=7.2 9 (1967Ba45), 6.5 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} (1970Ba37), 0.017 {I3} (1969Ok02), 0.23 {I5} (1967Ba45) 
$ ICE(K)=0.83 17 (1967Ba45), 0.67 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=225.71 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.49 {I6} (1970Ba37) 
$ ICE(K)=0.54 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted av: 6.2 {I3} (1969Ok02), 6.3 {I5} (1970Ba37), 6.3 {I9} (1974HeYW), 6.7 {I5} (1967Ba45). 2004Mi09 give I|g(468.09+465.76)=13.00 {I9} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I3} (1970Ba37), <0.03 (1967Ba45) 
$ Theory: KC(E2)=0.0222, KC(E1)=0.0083, KC(M1)=0.087 
$ ICE(K)<0.17 (1967Ba45), 0.11 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02) and |a(K)exp=0.059 {I7} (1970Ba37), 0.062 {I7} (1969Ok02), 0.062 {I10} (1967Ba45); |d from |g|g(|q); ; K/L=6 (1966Pr05), 7.3 {I8} (1969Ok02) 
$ ICE(K)=5.75 (normalized,1967Ba45,1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1967Ba45) 
TI$calculated from intensity balance in the level scheme, no direct |b{+-} feeding is expected to this level (2U transition). 
RI$0.106 {I19} from I(|g+ce) and |a. Others: 0.10 {I3} from I(ce(L)) (1967Ba45), |a(L)=247 {I43}; <0.15 from |g spectrum (1967Ba45) 
M,MR$from L1:L2:L3=100 {I5}:16 {I2}:36 {I5} (1967Ba45) 
$ ICE(L)=23 (1967Ba45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from K/L=1.0 {I2} (1966Pr05), |a(K)exp=0.20 {I2} (1970Ba37) 
$ ICE(K)=5.1 (1967Ba45), 4.3 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.070 {I7} (1970Ba37), 0.051 {I+12-6} (1967Ba45) 
$(192|g)(543|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.060 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.014 {I24} (1969Ok02) 
$ ICE(K)=0.79 16 (1967Ba45), 1.04 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from 1969Ok02 and 1974HeYW. 2004Mi09 give I|g(468.09+465.76)=13.00 {I9} 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.080 {I6} (1970Ba37), 0.079 {I18} (1969Ok02), 0.081 {I25} (1967Ba45); and |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02) 
$(468|g)(246|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.109, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1969Ok02) 
$ ICE(K)=0.58 17 (1967Ba45), 0.54 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.090 {I9} (1970Ba37), 0.095 {I20} (1969Ok02), 0.10 {I3} (1967Ba45) and |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02) 
$(475|g)(317|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1969Ok02) 
$ ICE(K)=0.75 19 (1967Ba45), 0.72 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.026 {I5} (1970Ba37); also |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02) 
$(714|g)(77|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.003 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I24} (1969Ok02) 
$ ICE(K)=0.30 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I5} (1970Ba37); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.013, |a(K)(E1)=0.0020, |a(K)(E2)=0.0050 
$ ICE(K)=0.069 (1970Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
I|g=0.31 {I6} from I(|g+ce) and |a; I(|g+ce) deduced from intensity balance in level scheme 
1968Bo22 observed prompt coincidences of 494 |g with L-conversion electrons from 55-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(tot,378|g) |J 0.7 from total intensity balance between 638-keV and 378-keV |g rays in {+9}Be({+208}Pb,X|g) (2011St21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences (not observed directly). The authors in 2011St21 observed no K X-rays, thus suggesting that E|g is below the K-electron binding energy (B{-e{+-}}(K)=80.725 keV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From the observed K- and L-conversion electron lines of 825 keV and 896 keV, respectively. The E|g was not directly observed 
M$From the measured K/L(exp)=3.4 {I9} (2009PoZZ), but E3 assignment (K/L(theory)=3.7) cannot be unambiguously excluded 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From 2009Po01, based on the observed K- and L-conversion electron lines of 825 keV and 896 keV, respectively. The E|g was not directly observed 
M$From the measured K/L(exp)=3.4 {I9} (2009PoZZ), but E3 assignment (K/L(theory)=3.7) cannot be unambiguously excluded 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,M$from adopted gammas for {+175}Hg in ENSDF database. This |g not seen in |a|g coincidence data of 2010An01 due to high conversion coefficient for 80|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 2009An20 in {+181}Pb |a decay. Other: 77 keV in 2003Me20 and 78 keV in 2005CaZV 
M$From |a(exp)=2.7 {I9} using the intensities of the (6990-7060)-keV |a group and 77.2-keV |g-ray in {+181}Pb |a decay (2009An20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(exp)=2.4 {I4}, from intensities of K|a, K|b x rays of Hg and 246|g in {+144}Sm({+36}Ar,3n|g ) (2003Me20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 2009An20 
M$From |a(exp)=2.7 {I9} using the intensity of 6990-7060 |a group and 77.2|g in 2009An20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp, deduced from observed I(K| x ray) in 2002Je09; value is consistent with pure E2, but small M1 component cannot be ruled out. M1 component inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Q from R=1.24 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.25 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.16 {I9}. Not M2 from intensity balance argument; see comment on mult(136.2|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$calculated in {+180}Tl |e decay from relative branching of 105|g and 272|g and conversion coefficient. I|g leads to rather large B(E2) strength. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)/ce(tot)=0.85 {I18} 
TI$from |SI(|g+c.e.) feeding the 420 level. Direct feeding of J|p=0+ is not expected. 
E$from Si spectrum gated on 272|g and 671|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$deduced from I(|g+ce) 
TI$from |g|g coincidence spectrum gated on 622|g which populates the 602 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$calculated from I|g(272|g), the relative branching ratio of the 272|g (89%) and 105|g (11%) determined from |g|g coincidences, and |a(E2)=4.575 for the 105|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$ Alternate placement for 90.3|g from 9/2- to 7/2- has been discussed 2009An17, but considered less likely due to problems with multipolarity assignment and consideration of band systematics 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=4.7 {I13} (2014Br05) 
M$from |a(exp)=4.7 {I13}, quoted by 2014Br05 (in reference 15) from {+182}Tl decay results yet to be published 
E$|g ray reported on the basis of {+182}Tl decay results yet to be published (reference 15 in 2014Br05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ transition not listed in 2010Sc03. It is omitted in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset since 930 level is omitted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
ECC$quoted by 2014Br05 (in reference 15) from {+182}Tl decay results yet to be published 
E$|g ray reported on the basis of {+182}Tl decay results yet to be published (reference 15 in 2014Br05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=7.2 {I13} from |g-ray intensity imbalance; this measured value is much larger than the theoretical |a(M1) and |a(M2) conversion coefficients, implying a large E0 component of this transition (2017Ra11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placed from a level at 1547.6 in Table 1 but in the decay scheme in Figure 4 it is placed from the 1548.6 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$2023St03 mention that relative intensity of the 335.0, E0 transition could not be measured as its K-conversion line overlaps K-conversion line of 332.4|g and L- and M+.. conversion line of 260.9|g. 
$|r{+2}(E0)=186 (2023St03) 
$Branching ratio=100 for 335.0, E0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition from |g(ce)-coin data 
$Relative branching ratio=5.8|*10{-5} {I8} 
$Deduced B(E2: 16.1)/B(E2: 351.1)=2.9 {I4} (2023St03). Using B(E2)(351.1, 2+|)0+)=0.33 e{+2}b{+2} {I2} from Coulomb excitation (2019Wr01), 2023St03 deduce E2 matrix element (335,0+ to 351.1,2+)=2.2 eb {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=6.7 {I8} 
$|d(E2/M1) limit at 95% confidence interval (2023St03) 
$Deduced q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=50 {I+33-7}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.110 {I40} (2023St03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=9.9 {I59}, from comparison of intensity of the 1218|g in different gates and subtracting contribution from conversion electrons 
$|a(exp) limit at 95% confidence level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio <12, transition observed as a conversion line, |g-intensity limit is with 95% confidence interval 
$|a(K)exp limit at 95% confidence level 
M$E0 component suggested from |a(K)exp>0.90. 2023St03 list E0(+M1+E2) in Table I. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E average of 67.4 {I3} from |a decay (15.2 s) and 66.8 {I3} from {+155}Gd({+32}S,4n|g) E=159 MeV. 
M from |a(exp) in |a decay (15.2 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Placement of this |g from J=3/2 {I67}-kev member of 1/2[521] band suggested in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV is not adopted. Other E|g: 88.9 {I5} from ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV. 
M Q intraband |g from ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 25 {I5} from ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV and 39 {I8} from ({+32}S,4n|g) E=159 MeV; note, however, that the former study does not report a known 253|g in the 9/2[624] band which may, conceivably, have been unresolved from the 252|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement of E|g (I|g)=191.4 {I5} (40 {I20}) from this level in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV is rejected by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E 303.0 {I2} in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV. 
RI I(303|g):I(436|g)=78 {I8}:100 {I30} in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Placed as J=31/2 to 27/2 transition in 1/2[521] band in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV but |g is absent in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=159 MeV, so evaluator considers level and placement to be uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 626.3 {I5} in ({+32}S,4n|g) E=160 MeV for weak |g; possibly |g is contaminated or misplaced in one or both studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 61 {I9} in |e decay and 67 {I6} in ({+32}S,4n|g): E=156,160 MeV. 
Other E|g: 722.2 {I3} from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO is low for suggested |DJ=2 character of transition in ({+32}S,4n|g): E=156,160 MeV but compatible with J=5 for 1817 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.6 {I7} 
DCO=0.76 {I11}; low for |DJ=2 character of transition implied by level scheme from 1995De30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 17% in Adopted dataset for {+184}Hg in ENSDF database as of Feb 11, 2014 is a misprint. A request made on Feb 11, 2014 to make a correction in ENSDF database. This correction in ENSDF database has now been made. 
$Revised uncertainty of 11 is from e-mail reply of Feb 12, 2014 from L. Gaffney, using correct uncertainty of 1.7% in branching ratio; see also Erratum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g(119.4)/I|g(286)=1.32 {I24}/100.00 {I24} in Adopted dataset for {+184}Hg in ENSDF database; whereas this ratio is 3.0 {12}/100 in e-mail reply of May 16, 2014 
RI$see T{-1/2} comment for 653 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=5.9 {I12}, I(|g+ce) intensity relative to the transition intensity of the 375.4, E0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$Deduced |r{+2}(E0)=0.0041 {I14} (2023St03) 
$I(E0) obtained form the intensity of K-shell electrons multiplied by 1.2 to account for other shells. 
$Branching ratio=100 for E0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=8.0 {I11} 
$|a(exp) obtained indirectly from the intensity of |g rays. |a(K)exp from |a(exp)-(|a(L)exp + |a(M+)exp) 
MR$deduced by 2023St03 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=50 {I+61-7} (2023St03) 
$Deduced |r{+2}(E0)=0.090 {I30} (2023St03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio<0.6 
$Intensity limit with 95% confidence interval, obtained from singles spectrum after subtracting contribution from daughter activities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio<3.7 
$|a(K)exp limit with 95% confidence interval 
$Transition observed in conversion electron spectrum only, |g intensity and branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio<11.7 
$|g not observed, |g intensity and branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval from |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=4.5 {I14}. 
$|a(K)exp limit with 95% confidence interval 
$Electron intensity relative to the 589.1-keV |g transition intensity 
$I(E0) obtained form the intensity of K-shell electrons multiplied by 1.2 to account for other shells. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=58 {I7} 
$Intensity from difference of singles spectrum and gated coincidence spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio<5.4 
$|a(K)exp limit with 95% confidence interval 
$Transition observed in conversion electron spectrum only, |g intensity and branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=100 {I8} 
$Intensity from difference of singles spectrum and gated coincidence spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio<10.2 
$|g not observed, |g intensity and branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval from |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=24 {I5} 
$Intensity from difference of singles spectrum and gated coincidence spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E,RI,M from {+185}Hg IT decay (21 s). |DE estimated by evaluator from the conversion electron spectrum of 1982Bo27. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3)exp=17.4 {I14}:16.6 {I43}: 15.4 {I68}:5.5:.4:5.4. 
TI % Ice exp=71 {I22}. 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1)+ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(M4)+ce(M5)exp= <0.7:14.2:12.3:3.7:3.3:0.9. 
TI % Ice exp=54 {I10}. 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 26.2 from Table 2 of |g-ray data, 26.02 {I10} from Table 3 of ce data 
M,MR$from 2013Sa43, deduced from their ce data 
$I(ce,L1)=145 {I20}, I(ce,L2,estimated)=120, I(ce,L3)=111 {I39}, I(ce,M1)=44.7, I(ce,M2+M3)=91.3, I(ce,N1+N2+N3)=30.3, 
$L1/L3=1.31, M1/(M2+M3)=0.49 {I10}, L1/(N1+N2+N3)=4.8 {I7}, L3/(N1+N2+N3)=3.7 {I13}, M1/(N1+N2+N3)=1.50 {I15}, (M2+M3)/(N1+N2+N3)=3.0 {I3}. Total intensity=627 {I113}. It seems the intensities are for 1000 decays of {+185}Hg isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from 2013Sa43, deduced from their ce data 
$I(ce,M1)=3.2 {I6}, I(ce,M2)=179 {I33}, I(ce,M3)=231 {I42}, I(ce,N2)=45 {I8}, I(ce,N3)=57 {I11}. Total intensity=627 {I113}. It seems the intensities are for 1000 decays of {+185}Hg isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce spectrum and listed in authors' table 3 of ce data. Other E|g=26.2 from |g ray spectrum in Table 2. 
M,MR$from 2013Sa43, deduced from their ce data 
$I(ce,L1)=145 {I20}, I(ce,L2,estimated)=120, I(ce,L3)=111 {I39}, I(ce,M1)=44.7, I(ce,M2+M3)=91.3, I(ce,N1+N2+N3)=30.3, 
$L1/L3=1.31, M1/(M2+M3)=0.49 {I10}, L1/(N1+N2+N3)=4.8 {I7}, L3/(N1+N2+N3)=3.7 {I13}, M1/(N1+N2+N3)=1.50 {I15}, (M2+M3)/(N1+N2+N3)=3.0 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from 2013Sa43, deduced from their ce data 
$I(ce,M1)=3.2 {I6}, I(ce,M2)=179 {I33}, I(ce,M3)=231 {I42}, I(ce,N2)=45 {I8}, I(ce,N3)=57 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E,M$from {+185}Hg Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in ENSDF database, taken from 1982Bo27 (Nucl. Phys. A386, 308), uncertainty of 0.1 keV is from 2013Sa43 whereas in ENSDF database it is listed as 0.5 keV, which seems an overestimate 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$Calculated from |a(K)exp=2.8 {I3} (1977Be23) and K/L=5.3 {I14} (1977Co21), assuming M+/L=0.33 ({+186}Tl |e Decay (27.5 s). 
 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI probably stronger than 770|g (from ({+34}S,4n|g)); not reported in {+186}Tl |e decay but may be masked there by 349.1|g from daughter. 
M$From ({+36}S,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Reported in ({+36}S,4n|g) only; strength comparable to that for 498|g (based on line width in drawing). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$placed as member of |DJ=2 intraband cascade in ({+36}S,4n|g) and ({+28}Si,4n|g), based on unenumerated DCO or |g(|q) data; M1+E2 from |a(K)exp for doublet dominated by this transition in {+186}Tl |e decay favors |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from ({+34}S,4n|g). 
M$from DCO ratio and linear polarization in ({+36}S,4n|g). Q in ({+28}Si,4n|g) in disagreement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M stretched Q from |g(|q) in ({+34}S,4n|g) for doublet in which this is minor component; intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from ({+28}Si,4n|g). Presumed to be the same |g as the differently-placed 642.6|g in ({+36}S,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$calculated from I(523ce(K)) (normalized so |a(K)exp(216)=2.8 {I3}) (1977Be23) and K/L=5.7 {I8} (1977Co21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$Calculated from |a(K)exp=2.8 {I3} (1977Be23) and K/L=5.3 {I14} (1977Co21), assuming M+/L=0.33. Other |a(K)exp: 3.1 {I7} (1977Co21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Placement from (1994De25). 
M E2(+M1) (|d|>1.4) from |a(K)exp; feeds 0+ state. 
Placement from 1994De25. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI a 607|g depopulates levels in both {+186}Hg and the {+186}Pt granddaughter (1977Co21, based on observation of K| x ray(Hg)-607|g coin and K| x ray(Pt)-607|g coin). Therefore, 1977Co21 determine I|g from on-line data (I|g=14.5 in one off-line run). 
M Other: E1 from |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I20} (1977Be23); however, if line were a doublet (as in (HI,xn|g)), |a(K)exp would be consistent with an E2 component of |<31%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placed from a 1232 level by 1977Co21 and 1977Be23; relocated by evaluators to be consistent with reported observation of 1906 level in {+186}Tl |e decay (1994De25) and with adopted placement of the 826.0|g from that level in ({+36}S,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E $1977Co21 and 1977Be23 report that |g of this energy definitely belongs in {+186}Hg (from |g|g coin), but this E|g is also present in the {+186}Au daughter of {+186}Hg. Presumably, I|g may include some contribution from the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1977Be23; placement by evaluators, based on HI data. 
RI$1.8~{I2} from 1977Be23 is presumably for 477.9|g+478.6|g; I|g|?1 for 478.6|g in 1994De25, leaving I|g|?0.8 for this placement. 
M$E2 for presumed doublet (from |a(K)exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
In ({+36}S,4n|g) and ({+28}Si,4n|g), the 398|g is a doublet; it is likely that it is a doublet in this reaction also since adopted branching indicates that I(398|g) is roughly half I(811|g), contrary to relative I|g indicated in figure of 1984JaZS. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.34 {I29} (1983Ja18); interpreted by authors as stretched Q, but does not rule out D+Q |DJ=0,1 or D |DJ=0. However, adopted level scheme requires D |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$I(E0) obtained form the intensity of K-shell electrons multiplied by 1.2 to account for other shells. 
$Branching ratio=100 for E0 transition 
$|r{+2}(E0)>50 (2023St03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio=100 {I5} 
MR$deduced by 2023St03 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)>21 at 95% confidence interval; |r{+2}(E0)=59 {I23} (2023St03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio <11 
$|g not observed, |g intensity and branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval from |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp limit 1t 95% confidence interval 
$Relative branching ratio <2.5 
$Transition observed in conversion electron spectrum only, |g branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Relative branching ratio <16.8 
$|g not observed, |g branching upper limit given with 95% confidence interval from |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.030 {I7} (1976Bo04), 0.031 {I3} (1984Co17); |a(L)exp=0.009 {I2} (1984Co17). Others: A{-2}=0.31 {I5}, a{-4}=-0.04 {i4}, pol=0.46 {i7} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from ce data in {+188}Tl |e decay (1984Co17). 
M$from |a(K)exp>1.3 {I1} (1984Co17), >1.3 and |a(L)exp>0.22 (1976Bo04) 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.0077 {I+22-32} (1994Jo13,1999Wo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.085 {I21} (1976Bo04), 0.087 {I5} (1984Co17); |a(L)exp=0.013 {I4} (1984Co17). Others: DCO=1.30 {i15} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0061 {I15} (1976Bo04), 0.0065 {I7} (1984Co17). Others: a{-2}=0.2 {i1}, pol=0.4 {i2} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}=0.29 {i6}, a{-4}=-0.06 {i10}, pol=0.4 {i1} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.15 {i3} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.049 {I7} (1976Bo04), 0.040 {I4} (1984Co17). Others: a{-2}=0.33 {i13}, pol=0.43 {i15} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0073 {I8} (1984Co17), 0.0078 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.0020 {I3}, and K/L=3.9 {I8} (1976Bo04). Others: a{-2}=0.27 {i15} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.018 {I5} (1984Co17) consistent with both M1 and E2, but the latter agrees with the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.071 {I18} (1976Bo04), 0.083 {I15} (1984Co17). Other: a{-2}=0.26 {i6}, pol=0.42 {i12} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I3} (1976Bo04), 0.019 {I2} (1984Co17), |a(L)exp=0.0048 {I8} (1984Co17). Other: A{-2}=0.30 {I6}, a{-4}=-0.1 {i1}, pol=0.7 {i2} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I4} (1984Co17), |a(L)exp=0.0036 {I9} (1976Bo04). Other: A{-2}=0.37 {i10} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0085 {I13} (1976Bo04), 0.0065 {I11} (1984Co17), |a(L)exp=0.0021 {I3} and K/L=4.1 {I8} (1976Bo04). Other: A{-2}=0.26 {i10}, a{-4}=0.06 {i10}, pol=0.5 {i2} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4} (1976Bo04), 0.0020 {I3} (1984Co17). Other: a{-2}=-0.24 {i10}, pol=0.3 {i1} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.014 {I4} (1984Co17). Other: A{-2}=0.31 {I6}, a{-4}=-0.04 {i4}, pol=0.53 {i13} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$E2 from |a(K)exp=0.066 {I16} (1976Bo04). |a(K)exp=0.021 {I5} (1984Co17) suggests E1. Other: A{-2}=0.29 {I5}, a{-4}=0.03 {i10}, pol=0.45 {i8} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} (1976Bo04), 0.020 {I10} (1984Co17). Other: a{-2}=-0.20 {i8}, a{-4}=0.0 {i1}, pol=0.26 {i8} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|<0.005 (1976Bo04) gives E1, whereas |a(K)exp=0.0093 {I35} (1984Co17) gives E2. Other: A{-2}=-0.12 {I8}, a{-4}=-0.01 {i10}, pol=0.2 {i1} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} (1976Bo04), 0.023 {I9} (1984Co17). Other: A{-2}=0.34 {i15}, pol=0.58 {i25} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.21 {i5} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15); DCO=1.5 {i3} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ); |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.19 {i10}, pol=0.45 {i10} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.25 {i8} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ); |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.32 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {i10}, pol=0.4 {i1} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.47 {i11} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.29 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i10}, pol=0.4 {i2} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.23 {i10} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.29 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {i3}, pol=0.43 {i10} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.20 {i7} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.28 {i10}, pol=0.3 {i1} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=0.80 {i10} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.21 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.13 {i10}, pol=0.25 {i8} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.41 {i11} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.29 {i9}, A{-4}=-0.1 {i1}, pol=0.23 {i7} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.30 {i10} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.23 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {i10} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.56 {i12} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.28 {i10}, A{-4}=-0.05 {i6}, pol=0.3 {i1} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.43 {i9} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.35 {i15}, A{-4}=-0.15 {i15} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.4 {i3} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {i10}, pol=0.38 {i11} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.32 {i12} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.30 {i15} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.46 {i12} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.21 {i6}, pol=0.4 {i2} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.42 {i11} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.36 {i9}, pol=0.46 {i14} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.29 {i20} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.24 {i8} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.23 {i17} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.33 {i7}, pol=0.7 {i3} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.60 {i10} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.33 {i15} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.25 {i21} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.3 {i2} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). Other: DCO=1.47 {i25} in {+156}Gd({+36}S,4n|g) (1993BeZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15) 
M$A{-2}=0.26 {i12} in {+164}Dy({+28}Si,4n|g) (1988Ha15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I10}, pol=0.38 {I11} 
E$The ordering of the 468-472 cascade is adopted from 1993BeZJ. It is reversed in 1988Ha15 thus defining a level at 4153.8 instead of the present level at 4157.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}=0.0077 {I+22-32} (1994Jo13) 
E$from ce data (1984Co17). 
$I(|g+ce)=0.31 {I3}, deduced from ce(K)(824)/ce(K)(413|g)=0.080 {i9}, ce(L)(824)/ce(K)(413|g)= 0.017 {I2} (1984Co17). Other: |>58% (1994Jo13) 
M$from |a(K)exp>1.3 {I1} (1984Co17), >1.3 and |a(L)exp>0.22 (1976Bo04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0085 {I13} (1976Bo04), 0.0065 {I11} (1984Co17), |a(L)exp=0.0021 {I3} and K/L=4.1 {I8} (1976Bo04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Pol=+0.35 {I8} 
E$from level-scheme Fig. 3 in 1981Bo08. E|g=255.7 in authors' Table 1 seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$Note that positive A{-4} is inconsistent with stretched quadrupole 
$I|g(142|')/I|g(90|')=1.44 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$K(853)/K(733)=0.7 {I1}, deduced from ce-ce coincidence intensities in the ce(L)(59 keV) gate 
$I|g(142|')/I|g(90|')=1.05 {I29} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$others: 61 {I2} from ({+14}N,5n|g) and 74 {I7} from ({+24}Mg,4n|g). These values are too high probably due to unresolved peaks 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ce data in {+190}Tl |e decay (3.7 min). From ce data in in-beam |g ray work, mult=E2+M1 with |d|?0.85 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0015 {I3} (2001Ko16) 
E$811.7 {I10} (1993Ca23) was assigned to SD-1 band 
M$from DCO measurement (1995Cr02) 
$Branching ratio=0.29 {I4} (1995Cr02), 0.35 {I4} (2001Ko16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g from ce data (1983Gu05). Uncertainty assigned by evaluators 
RI$from I(|g+ce)(420.0)=I(|g+ce)(23.9), assumed E2 and |a=5300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
Placement from adopted levels, gammas. A reverse ordering of the 467-680 cascade feeding the 2465 level was tentatively suggested by 1986Hu02 which defined levels at 2931 (10+) and 3611 (12+) instead of the presently adopted 3277 (12+) and 3743 (14+), respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M,MR$from K/L and |g(|q) 
$I|g(38|')/I|g(90|')=0.56 {I10} 
$I|g(45|')/I|g(90|')=0.70 {I7} (1972In02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty assigned by evaluators 
$Reported in ce-ce coin data as ce(M)(23.9|g) (1983Gu05) 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce)(419.9|g)=I(|g+ce)(23.9|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(38|')/I|g(90|')=1.49 {I14}, 1.44 {I17} 
$Placement is from high-spin levels, gammas. The ordering of the 621.6|g-633.9|g cascade was reversed in 1982Gu10 which defined the intermediate level at 3346 instead of the present level at 3358 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g now assigned to a different level at 2318.3, based on results from in-beam |g-ray work. Some component may, however, deexcite this level also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M Conflicting assignments: Dominant E2 from |a(L)exp=109 and |a(M)exp=33.3 ({+191}Tl |e decay (5.22 min) 1976GoZE - Table 4-4), while dominant M1 from |d=0.04 from %E2=0.2 in 1987BoZT based on ce measurements, data were not listed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 390.5 {I3} (HI,xn|g), 390.3 {I3} (|a,7n|g), and 390.3 {I7} {+191}Tl ec decay (5.22 m). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 535.5 {I3} (HI,xn|g), 535.3 {I3} (|a,7n|g), and 535.2 {I10} {+191}Tl ec decay (5.22 m). 
MR from |g(|q) (1975Li16) in {+194}Pt(|a,n|g) dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E Other: 52.1 (1987BoZT) 
MR from |a(L)exp=30.9 and |a(M)exp=9.7 (1976GoZE - Table 4-4). Other: |d=0.08 from %E2=0.64 in 1987BoZT is smaller almost by an order. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce(K)/ce(L) exp=1.2 {i3} (1974Va19). I{-e}=18.8 {I19} (1976GoZE) yields |a(K)exp=0.188 and normalized to |a(K)=0.1407 (theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from |g|g coincidences (1988WoZZ). Also 49.0 in 1987BoZT 
M from |a(L)exp=109 and |a(M)exp=33.3 (1976GoZE - Table 4-4). Other: |d=0.04 from %E2=0.2 in 1987BoZT based on ce measurements data not listed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |a(K)(exp)=0.16 {i4}, average of 0.20 {i3} (1976GoZE: I{-e}=15.6 {I20} - overlapping electron line) and 0.12 {i3} (1974Va19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Doublet. I|g(doublet)=27.6 {i23}. Coincidences with the 261.5, 521.7, and 566.8-keV |g rays (1988WoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Doublet. I|g(doublet)=10.7 {i11}. Coincidences with the 207.5-keV |g ray (1988WoZZ) 
M from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.09 {i4}. I{-e}=0.088 {I55} (1976GoZE - overlapping electron line). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.033, |a(K)(E2)=0.010. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |a(K)exp=0.05 {i3} (data I|g and Ie=1.0 {I3} data yield |a(K)exp=0.5 {i3}, indicates inconsistency either in I|g or Ie). |a(K)exp=0.0673 with overlapping electron line (1976GoZE - Table 4-4). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.002 {i2}. I{-e}=0.063 {I40} (1976GoZE - overlapping electron line). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.016, |a(K)(E2)=0.0057 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.008 {i5}. I{-e}=0.063 {I40} (1976GoZE - overlapping electron line) yields |d=1.8 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$for unresolved doublet, intensity from |g|g coin measurements - (1974Be11, 1975Li16) 
A{-2} and A{-4} are for unresolved 166.6-166.9 keV doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
TI$ for unresolved doublet, intensity from |g|g coin measurements - (1974Be11, 1975Li16), 
M A{-2} and A{-4} for unresolved 166.6-166.9 keV doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 52 {i3} (1986Hu02: complex line, intensity estimated from coincidence spectra), 1990Ye03 quote I|g=59.6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 24 {i6} (1986Hu02). 
M$Angular distribution coefficients indicate |DJ=1 stretched dipole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 4 {i1} (1986Hu02: complex line, intensity estimated from coincidence spectra). 
$The multipolarity (probable E2) suggested both by DCO values from 1992Ye01, and by angular distribution coefficients from 1986Hu02 disagrees sharply with the |D|p=1 required by the assigned J|p values of the levels proposed in both references for the placement of this |g ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 44 {i9} (1986Hu02: undivided intensity from superposition of |g lines of 166.6 and 166.9 keV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 26 {i7} (1986Hu02: undivided intensity from superposition of |g lines of 480.1 and 480.2 keV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 44 {i3} (1986Hu02: undivided intensity from superposition of |g lines of 166.6 and 166.9 keV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 519.9 {I3} (1992Ye01) and 519.5 {I3} (1986Hu02). 
RI$I|g=6 {i2} (1986Hu02: complex line, intensity estimated from coincidence spectra). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 875.2 {I4} (1992Ye01), 874.6 {I5} (1986Hu02). 
RI$Other: 2.3 {i8} (1986Hu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=787 keV, I|g=4 {i1} (1986Hu02: complex line, intensity estimated from coincidence spectra). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 268.8 {I3} (1992Ye01), 268.5 {I3} (1986Hu02). 
RI$Other: 5 {i2} (1986Hu02). 
M$|g{|q}, DCO indicates D, intensity balance requires M1 (1992Ye01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: E|g=440.3 {i3} keV, I|g=1.8 {i5} (1986Hu02: complex line, intensity estimated from coincidence spectra). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: E|g=799.8 {i3} keV, I|g=0.7 {i2} (1986Hu02: complex line, intensity estimated from coincidence spectra). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 364.4 {I3} (1992Ye01) and 364.6 {I3} (1986Hu02). 
RI$Other: 1.6 {i5} (1986Hu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$Tander (2007Va21 subgroup) Ig value: 1.00 {I4} 
E|g=469.6 keV, I|g=0.80 {i3} (1989Mo08). E|g=470.7 keV (2004Si19,1999SiZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of 0.81 {I15}, 1.1 {I3} from {+192}Tl |e decay (9.6 min+10.8 min) and 0.88 {I16}, 0.50 {I8} from {+192}Pt(|a,4n|g), {+194}Pt(|a,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M M1 from |a(K)exp in {+192}Tl |e decay, but stretched Q from |g(|q) in {+170}Er(Mg,xn|g); establishes |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E from (|a,xn|g). |DE{-|g} unstated by authors; uncertainty in level energy difference is |?0.4 keV. 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a in {+192}Pt(|a,4n|g), {+194}Pt(|a,6n|g). 
M from (|a,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,M from {+192}Pt(|a,4n|g), {+194}Pt(|a,6n|g). 
E uncertainty unstated by authors; E|g=28.2 {I5} from level energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E Complex peak (wider than normal). 
Order of 629|g and 633|g in (|a,4n|g) is the reverse of that adopted here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=30.0 {I15}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=11.0:91.1. 
K/L=3.9 {I11}, |a(K)exp=0.0113 {I18} (1975Va20). Other |a(K)exp: 0.013 {I4} (1968Pe13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=12.6 {I6}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=14.7:4.78. 
K/L=2.3 {I17} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.016 {I2} (1981So09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.016 {I5} (1968Pe13), 0.015 {I4} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g(exp)=6.5 {I4} was estimated to be 25% from 2+ level placement and 75% from 3+ level placement on basis of coincidence data and I|g, as determined for several mixtures of two parent isomers (1981So09). 
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=13.1 {I7} for doublet; |?42% of this (i.e., |?5.5 {I3}) deexcites the 1114 level, based on |g|g coin data (1981So09). I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=15.5:4.37. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=1.23 {I12}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=1.29:0.44. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.080 {I22} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=1.43 {I10}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=1.10:1.9. 
|a(K)exp=0.009 {I3}. Other |a(K)exp: 0.023 {I16} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=1.48 {I11}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=1.33:3.03. 
|a(K)exp=0.027 {I4}. Other |a(K)exp: 0.022 {I11} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=6.2 {I3}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=-1.9:33.5. 
K/L=7 {I5} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} (1981So09), 0.009 {I3} (1968Pe13), 0.0088 {I22} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=8.5 {I4}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=-1.4:39.5. 
K/L=3.5 {I20} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I4} (1981So09), 0.0025 {I7} (1975Va20), 0.0030 {I9} (1968Pe13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=1.06 {I6}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=0.21:5.41. 
K/L=0.48 {I13}, |a(L)exp=0.91 {I10} (1975Va20); |a(L)exp=1.2 {I3} (1981So09); |a(L)exp=1.1 {I3} (1968Pe13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=2.66 {I14}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=0.33:11.9. 
K/L=4.4 {I16}, |a(K)exp=0.077 {I12} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.020 {I3} (1981So09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.067 {I20} (1968Pe13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
May include component from {+192}Pb (1981So09). 
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=0.24 {I9}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=-0.42:2.45. 
K/L=4.6 {I26} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.30 {I10} (1981So09), 0.15 {I7} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M adopted value. 
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=0.69 {I9}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=0.14:3.08. 
|a(K)exp=0.021 {I4} (1981So09); value lies mid-way between E1 and E2 theoretical values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=1.18 {I10}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=0.53:3.54. 
MR adopted value; |d=0.81 {I15} from |a(K)exp (1975Va20), 1.1 {I3} from K/L. |d=1.79 {I+24-19} from |a(K)exp of 1981So09 appears to be erroneous. 
K/L=3.7 {I7} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} (1981So09), 0.39 {I4} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=0.33 {I7}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=0.02:1.45. 
K/L=1.6 {I8} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.10 {I4} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(low-J enhanced source)=0.87 {I7}. I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=0.23:3.04. 
K/L=5.6 {I19} (1975Va20); |a(K)exp=0.18 {I2} (1981So09). Other |a(K)exp: 0.32 {I7} (1975Va20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g(low J):I|g(high J)=-0.05:2.1. 
|a(K)exp=0.042 {I11} (1981So09). 
M |a(K)exp implies mult=M1, in disagreement with stretched Q assignment from reaction data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E erroneously shown as E|g=343 in both 1994Le08 and 1995Le33; level energy difference is 143 keV. 
M I|g(158|')/I|g(86|')=0.66 {I14} (1994Le08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M I|g(158|')/I|g(86|')=1.96 {I24} or 1.89 {I23} (1994Le08); two data points are shown at this energy in fig. 1 but only one transition is known. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
K/L=5 {I2} (1983Gu05); rules out E2. Authors favor mult=E1. 
A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1975Li16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.90 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} (1975Li16) implies mult=D+Q. 
MR$weighted average of 0.94 {I+19-16} (from K/L, 1983Gu05) and 0.50 {I8} (from angular distribution, 1975Li16). 
K/L=4.0 {I4} (1983Gu05); inconsistent with mult=E1+M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI I(|g+ce)(upper limit)=29 {I4} (I(|g+ce) balance at 8+ 2447 level). 
(L1+L2)/L3=1.1 {I2} (1983Gu05); rules out magnetic multipoles and E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1975Li16). 
M from K/L and the ratio Ice(K)(10+ to 9-)/Ice(K)(9- to 7-) in coincidence spectra using a 28.4|g(12+ to 10+) gate (1983Gu05). 
K/L=5.8 {I10} (1983Gu05); implies mult=E1,M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
TI |g|g coincidence data used to resolve I(|g+ce)(416.3|g+416.5|g). 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1975Li16) for multiplet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
See comment with 629.2|g. 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (1975Li16). 
TI includes contributions from 633.1|g in {+193}Hg and 634.8|g in {+192}Hg. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 (in {+170}Er(Mg,xn|g)...) reversed the order of 629.2|g and 633.0|g. 
TI includes contribution from 628.7|g in {+191}Hg (1975Li16). 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10} (1975Li16) for impure line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M L1/L2=8.2 {i10}, M1/M2=7.6 {i12} (1974ViZS). Theory: M1: L1/L2=9.7, M1/M2=8.9; E1: L1/L2=1.22, M1/M2=1.39; E2: L1/L2=0.0197, M1/M2=0.0213 
TI$From (Ice(L12) + Ice(M12)) expt. + Ice (other) theory + I|g from Ice(L1)=5.6 {i4} expt. (1974ViZS) and |a(L1)=14.94 (theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M L1:L2:L3=1.25 {i7}: 0.24 {i2}: 4.10 {i16} (1974ViZS). Theory: L1:L2:L3=1.20: 0.24: 4.05 
TI$From (Ice(L) + Ice(M)) expt. + Ice (other) theory + I|g deduce from from Ice(L)=5.59 {i18} expt. (1974ViZS) and |a(L)=4120. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR From |a(K)exp=0.018 {i6}. |d deduced by evaluator, BriccMixing gives 0.8 {i8} and 0.8 {I+10-7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=-0.74 {i5}, A{-4}=+0.15 {i7}; A{-2} does not agree with A{-2} measured in (HI,xn|g) experiment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-1}=+0.38 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {i9} 
TI includes contributions from 633.1|g and 634.8|g in {+192}Hg. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.02 {i10}, A{-4}=+0.14 {i15}; contains contribution of contaminating 133.0 keV line in {+192}Hg. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.23 {i6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {i8}; |g(|q) from {+194}Pt(|a,5n|g) at 65 MeV. 
TI includes contribution from 745.4|g in {+192}Hg. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.30 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.37 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.98 {i1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=9.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M A{-2}=-0.34 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i5} (1986Hu02), does not agree with |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g); DCO=0.33 {i4} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=4.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M DCO=0.93 {i20} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=61 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.33 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.38 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.07 {i1} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=18 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=-0.66 {i2}, A{-4}=0.13 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=-0.67 {i5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {i7} (1986Hu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
I|g from 1997FoZX 
Unobserved transition, existence required from observed coincidences of 989-keV |g with members of Band (8) (1995Fo13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
I|g=23 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=-0.30 {i1}, A{-4}=0.05 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=-0.16 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.51 {i1} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=41 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.29 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i2} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.39 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i10} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.95 {i1} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=12 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=+0.30 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.96 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
I|g=14 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=-0.07 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {i3} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=-0.19 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i10} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.75 {i2} (1997FoZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=12 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.32 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i2} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.40 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.01 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=0.9 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M DCO=0.68 {i7} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=0.7 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M A{-2}=-0.30 {i15} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.47 {i6}. |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=25 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.33 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.40 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.91 {i1} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=28 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.30 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {i4} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.40 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.16 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.99 {i2} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=14 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.36 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i2} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.33 {i4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {i6} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.15 {i3} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=5.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M A{-2}(757.4|g+757.8|g)=+0.42 {i20} (1986Hu02), DCO=1.19 {i9} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=14 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=+0.43 {i4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i5} (1986Hu02), DCO=1.02 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=22 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.29 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.26 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i4} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.99 {i1} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=15 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.29 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i3} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.46 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.16 {i9} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.07 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=2.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M A{-2}=+0.28 {i10}, A{-4}=0.00 {i12} (1986Hu02), DCO=1.41 {i20} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=10.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
E 1998We23 report E|g=639.6 keV 
M A{-2}=0.38 {i2}, A{-4}=0.00 {i2} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.37 {i10}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i14} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.02 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=3.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M A{-2}(757.4|g+757.7|g)=+0.42 {i10} (1986Hu02), DCO=1.01 {i5} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=15.0 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M A{-2}=0.37 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.49 {i11}, A{-4}=-0.17 {i13} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.07 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=4 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=+0.35 {i8}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i10} (1986Hu02), DCO=0.95 {i2} (1997FoZX). Its a 37/2+ to 37/2+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=5 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.31 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.20 {i6} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.45 {i9}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i13} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.93 {i2} (1997FoZX); band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=7 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.34 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i2} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.45 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i7} (1986Hu02). DCO=1.07 {i3} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=4 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=+0.42 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.16 {i9} (1986Hu02), DCO=1.02 {i7} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=10 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.27 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.35 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i6} (1986Hu02). DCO=0.94 {i1} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a complex line, I|g=1.7 estimated from coincidence spectra. 
M DCO=1.05 {i20} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=4 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=0.34 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i1} (1998We23). Other: A{-2}=+0.41 {i8} (1986Hu02); band structure. DCO=0.93 {i3} (1997FoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=4 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=+0.31 {i9}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i11} (1986Hu02), DCO=0.91 {i6} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition uncertain due to low statistics and overlap with Hg x-rays. Existence required from observed coincidence data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Transition uncertain due to low statistics and overlap with Hg x-rays. Existence required from observed coincidences of transitions above the (43/2-) level with those below the 41/2- level (1995Fo13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M DCO=0.51 {i2}. 
1986Hu02 lists an unplaced |g with E|g=252.4 {i3}, I|g=4 (deduced from coincidences), A{-2}=-0.6 {i4} possibly corresponding to this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.23 {i30} (gate |DJ=1) (1997FoZX) indicates D, no assignment for final level in this dataset, Adopted Level (47/2+) to (43/2+) suggest Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a 873.1|g with I|g=1.4, but, based on very weak arguments. suggest an (E2) multipolarity. 
M DCO=0.53 {i1}; |D|p=yes from level scheme (1995Fo13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
1986Hu02 report a 868.8|g with I|g=1.0, part of a complex line, from this level. 
I|g=1.0 (1986Hu02) 
M A{-2}=+0.21 {i13}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i18} (1986Hu02), DCO=1.04 {i8} (1997FoZX); band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
I|g=7.81 (1993Ro03) 
M DCO=0.48 {i2}; M1 from DCO and intensity balance (1993De42). 1998We23 report A{-2}=-0.38 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {i2} for an M1/E2 transition of 284.2 keV at high excitation energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=8.88 (1993Ro03) 
M DCO=1.02 {i6}; |DJ=2 from DCO (1993De42). 1998We23 report A{-2}=0.26 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {i2} for an E2 transition of 772.0 keV at high excitation energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
I|g=4.94 (1993Ro03) 
M DCO=0.49 {i3}; M1 from DCO and intensity balance (1993De42). 1998We23 report A{-2}=-0.44 {i2}, A{-4}=0.02 {i1} for an M1/E2 transition of 197.3 keV at high excitation energies (see also the 197.1 keV |g ray: the quoted A{-2} and A{-4} values could possibly belong to that |g ray). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
I|g=3.25 (1993Ro03) 
M DCO=0.50 {i10}; M1 from DCO and intensity balance (1993De42). 1998We23 report A{-2}=-0.39 {i2}, A{-4}=0.14 {i2} for an M1/E2 transition of 160.1 keV at high excitation energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
I|g=5.17 (1993Ro03) 
M DCO=0.48 {i2}; M1, |DJ=1 from DCO and intensity balance (1993De42). 1998We23 report A{-2}=-0.43 {i2}, A{-4}=0.12 {i1} for an M1/E2 transition of 357.1 keV at high excitation energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 427.91 {I9} from {+194}Tl |e decay (33.0 min), 428.20 {I25} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 427.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 427.9 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 427.9 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 636.34 {I14} from {+194}Tl |e decay (33.0 min), 636.30 {I25} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 636.6 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 636.6 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 636.4 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 735.0 {I3} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 734.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 734.8 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 734.7 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 749.0 {I3} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 748.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 748.8 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 748.7 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 96.90 {I8} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 97.0 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 97.0 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,5n|g). Other: 100 {I20} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 110.96 {I8} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 111.0 {I3} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 111.2 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 83 {I20} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min) and 78 {I8} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 227.98 {I8} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 227.6 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 227.6 {I2} from (|a,xn|g) 
MR$other: 0.25 {I5} from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 233.10 {I15} from {+194}Tl |e decay (32.8 min), 232.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 232.9 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 232.7 {I2} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$also from ce data in (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 565.1 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 565.0 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 564.7 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,M$transition observed in ce data in (|a,xn|g) (1983Gu05) 
RI$from relative |g+ce intensity balance at 2423 level in ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 280.1 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 280.2 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 280.2 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 544.6 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 544.6 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 544.4 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g). Other: 412.9 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 611.2 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 611.2 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 611.0 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 706.2 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 706.2 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 705.9 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 643.2 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 643.0 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 643.0 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 574.7 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 574.7 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 574.4 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) and ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.0 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 931.4 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$|g(|q) from ({+13}C,5n|g) is consistent with D+Q, |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 485.2 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 485.2 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 485.1 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 236.3 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 236.2 {I2} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$Q from |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g); (E2) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Other: 235.5 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$Q from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) and (|a,xn|g) for a doublet; E2 is favorable at low energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 743.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 743.6 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 743.6 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) and (|a,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 305.9 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g) and 306.0 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$Q from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) and (|a,xn|g); E2 is favorable at low energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 671.5 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 671.3 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$|g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) and |g|g(DCO) consistent with mult=Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 383.0 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 383.2 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 382.7 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,5n|g). 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 990.1 {I8} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 989.2 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 710.5 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 710.4 {I2} from ({+13}C,5n|g), and 710.3 {I3} from (|a,xn|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 592.6 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 592.8 {I3} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Other: 506.7 {I3}, I|g=100 {I20} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) and |g|g(DCO) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 891.9 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 891.7 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+13}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from (L1+L2)/L3=5.1 {I10}, K/L=3.0 {I6}, L/M=1.3 {I5} (1960Ju01) 
RI$deduced from composite I|g=220 {I25} (1972Am03) for 33.0-min and 32.8-min activities on the basis of intensity balance at 428 level in the decay of 32.8-min isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 645.5 {I7} (1968Pe13), 645.2 {I3} (1972Am03) 
M$dominant E2 from |a(K)exp=0.015 in 1972Am03, but dominant M1 from |a(K)exp=0.029 {I9} in 1968Pe13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 428.4 {I5} (1968Pe13) 
RI$total I|g=220 {I25} (1972Am03) distributed in two parts on the basis of intensity balance at 428 level. The other component belongs to {+194}Tl |e decay (33.0 min). Other total I|g: 232 {I35} (Pb target), 610 {I91} (U target) (1968Pe13) 
M$(L1+L2)/L3=5.1 {I10}, K/L=3.0 {I6}, L/M=1.3 {I5} (1960Ju01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 636.8 {I5} (1968Pe13) 
RI$total I|g=150 {I20} (1972Am03) distributed in two parts on the basis of intensity balance at 1064 level. The other component belongs to {+194}Tl |e decay (33.0 min). Other total I|g: 151 {I23} (Pb target), 189 {I29} (U target) (1968Pe13) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 (1972Am03), 0.014 {I4} (1968Pe13), 0.013 (1966Pe06), |a(L)exp=0.0028, K/L=4.5 (1972Am03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 734.7 {I5} (1968Pe13) 
RI$others: 31 {I6} (Pb target), 29 {I6} (U target) (1968Pe13) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.008 (1972Am03), 0.011 {I3} (1968Pe13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 748.9 {I5} (1968Pe13) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0033 (1972Am03), 0.0034 {I10} (1968Pe13), 0.0024 (1966Pe06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1968Pe13 using permanent-magnet spectrograph plates. The same value is quoted by 1972Am03 
RI$other: 10.7 {I59} (Pb target), 9.1 {I46} (U target) (1968Pe13) 
M$|a(L)exp=4.0 {I4}, L/(M+N)=2.9 (1972Am03), |a(L)exp=4.2 {I8} (1968Pe13), (L1+L2)/L3=1.24 {I5}, L/M=3.6 {I4}, M/(N+O)=2.7 {I3} (1960Ju01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 228.4 {I10}, with I|g=7.3 {I37} (1968Pe13). 1972Am03 place this |g from a 1292 level which is discarded by evaluators. See comments for 219.0|g 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.31, K/L=1.8, K/(M+N)=8 (1972Am03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$placement based on results in (HI,xn|g); unplaced in 1972Am03 
M$|d(E2/M1)>5 from |a(K)exp=0.11 (1972Am03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$other: 209.7 {I10} (1968Pe13) 
RI$other: 7.1 {I36} (Pb target), 6.7 {I39} (U target) (1968Pe13) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.2, K/L=1.6, K/(M+N)=4.7 (1972Am03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$1996Fo01 state that all intensities are normalized to that of 427.9|g. The authors do not explicitly quote I|g for 427.9, the evaluators assume that to be 100. 
$Q{-2}A{-2}=+0.22 {I1}, Q{-4}A{-4}=-0.06 {I1} (1998We23) 
$Q{-2}A{-2}=+0.27 {I1}, Q{-4}A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} (1998We23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$Q{-2}A{-2}=+0.24 {I1}, Q{-4}A{-4}=-0.09 {I1} (1998We23) 
$Q{-2}A{-2}=+0.28 {I1}, Q{-4}A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} (1998We23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ce data in (|a,4n|g) (1983Gu05) 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) balance at 2424 level that, I(|g+ce)(52.0|g)=I(|g+ce)(59.5|g+280.2|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ce data in (|a,4n|g) (1983Gu05) 
RI$deduced from intensity balance at 2476 level, assuming no side feeding to this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2} is consistent with |DJ=1, D+Q. 1986Hu02 suggest pure dipole, but expected A{-2}|?-0.3 for |DJ=1, dipole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Complex line with total I|g=4.5 {I9}. 
$|g(|q) for unresolved line, as negative A{-2} is inconsistent |DJ=2, Q transition as suggested by |DJ|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Line contaminated by 232.2|g in {+193}Hg 
E$from 1977Gu05. Other: 232.8 {I3} (1975Li16) 
$E|g=233, I|g=29 {I4} (1980Kr21) 
$E|g=232.7, I|g=24 {I3} in-beam, 25 {I2} out-of-beam (1974Pr13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition observed in ce data (1983Gu05); not observed in 1974Pr13 
TI$deduced from intensity balance at 2424 level, assuming no side feeding to this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Transition observed in ce data (1983Gu05); energy uncertainty for this prominent line estimated by evaluators from ce spectrum in Fig. 5 of 1983Gu05 
TI$deduced from intensity balance at 2476 level, assuming no side feeding to this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$This |g is placed from 4498, (19-) to 4115, (17-) in the Adopted levels, as 1975Li16 missed observing a 235.5|g above the 3879, 15- level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$transition not seen, but required by |g|g. E|g from the level energy difference. 
TI$from I(|g+ce)/I(|g)(300|g)=37 {I9}/100 {I7} ({+195}Tl |e decay.). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I(ce(L1))=3540 {I110} and |a(L1)exp=18.7, and measured total I(ce)=5155 {I204} (1973Vi09) 
M from |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp:|a(M1)exp:|a(M2)exp:|a(M3) exp:|a(N)exp:|a(O+...)exp= 100 {I3}:11.4 {I6}:1.5 {I2}:21.9 {I11}:2.7 {I3}:0.33 {I4}:6.3 {I4}:1.50 {I8} 
MR from |a(L2)exp/|a(L1)exp=0.114 {I7} (1973Vi09), 0.112 {I12} (1969Ba42), 0.115 (1961Re12) and |a(M2)exp/|a(M1)exp=0.125 {I13} (1973Vi09). |a(L3)exp/|a(L1)exp and |a(M3)exp/|a(M1)exp ratios deviate below theory possibly because of penetration effect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI derived from I(ce(M))=1129 {I130} (1973Vi09) and |a(M)=61 
M from |a(M1)exp:|a(M2)exp:|a(M3)exp:|a(N1)exp:|a(N2)exp:|a(O+. ..)exp= 100 {I10}:13.5 {I14}:4.1 {I7}:25 {I2}:3.6 {I6}:6.2 {I5} (1973Vi09). Other |a(M1)exp:|a(M2)exp:|a(M3)exp=100:14.2 {I29}:7.1 {I19} (1969Ba42), 100:15 {I6}:5 {I2} (1961Ju06). 
MR based on M-subshell ratios of 1973Vi09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I(ce(L2))=38 {I3}, I(ce(L3))=32 {I2} (1973Vi09), and |a(L2)=37.5, |a(L3)=37.0 
M from |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp:|a(M2)exp:|a(M3)exp=<7:119 {I9}:100 {I6}:24 {I4}:30 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I(ce(L3))=2400 {I70} and |a(L3)=828, and measured total I(ce)=5535 {I280} (1973Vi09) 
M$from |a(K)exp:|a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp:|a(M1)exp:|a(M2)e xp:|a(M3)exp:|a(M4)exp+|a(M5)exp:|a(N)exp= 19.3 {I13}:40.2 {I16}:8.2 {I6}:100.0 {I3}:11.8 {I8}:3.2 {I4}:30 {I18}:2.3 {I2}:13.3. Others: |a(K)exp:|a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp=15.0 {I24}:41 {I2}:9.7 {I12}:100 (1969Ba42,1961Ju06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI $from I(|g+ce) and |a; other I|g=25 deduced from I(ce(L1))=470, |a(L1)=18.7 is based on ce(K)(242|g)/ce(L1)(37|g)=0.055 {I3} (1961Ju06) normalized to ce(K)(242|g)=26 {I3} (1973Va27) 
M from |a(L1)exp:|a(L2)exp:|a(L3)exp:|a(M)exp:|a(N1)exp=100:11 2:2.9 {I5}:29 {I3}:6.4 {I6} (1961Ju06) 
MR from |a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp (1973Vi09,1969Ba42,1961Re12, 1961Ju06) {+195}Hg IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI $from adopted branching of 16 and 53|g's and intensity balance at 53 level 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M,MR $from |a(M1)exp/|a(M2)exp/|a(M3)exp (1973Vi09) {+195}Hg IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI $from adopted branching of 16 and 53|g's and intensity balance at 53 level 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M from |a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp (1973Vi09) {+195}Hg IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp/|a(L3)exp=0.41 {I2} (1969Ba42) 
M 1969Ba42 deduce E5 admixture of <0.5% on the basis of comparison of L-subshell ratios. 
TI$Required for intensity balance at 176 level 
RI$From I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.17 {I2}, |a(K)exp/|a(L12)exp=3.3 {I7}, |a(L3)exp/|a(L12)exp=0.27 {I20} (1978Go15); |a(L)exp=0.07 {I2} (1977GoZW); |a(K)exp=0.23 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.054 {I12} (1973Va27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.267 {I40}, |a(K)exp/|a(L12)exp=3.7 {I11} (1978Go15); |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.077 {I23} (1977GoZW); |a(L)exp=0.076 {I24} (1973Va27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.069 {I14}, |a(K)exp/|a(L12)exp=1.9 {I5} (1978Go15); |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.039 {I8} (1977GoZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0535 {I50}, |a(K)exp/|a(L12)exp=6.3 {I13}, |a(L12)exp/|a(M)exp=2.1 {I8} (1978Go15); |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=6.0 (1973Va27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=0.53 {I5} (1998Ne01), 1.10 {I8} (1991Me06) 
M consistent with I|g(283|g)-I|g(914|g) cascade at E|a=34-50 MeV and I(|g+ce) balance about 1461 level; |g(|q) A{-2}=-0.15 {I10} (1974Pr09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.1 {I1} (1998Ne01), 1.08 {I8} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.4 {I1}; similar |g(|q) anisotropies observed for transitions between 21/2 states in {+197}Hg,{+199}Hg 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=0.47 {I7} (1998Ne01), 0.68 {I7} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I12} (1986AgZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.06 {I8} (1998Ne01), 1.01 {I8} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.43 {I15} (1974Pr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=0.94 {I6} (1998Ne01), 1.0 {I1} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.50 {I10} (1974Pr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=0.90 {I12} (1998Ne01), 1.03 {I8} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.35 {I15} (1986AgZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.07 {I9} (1998Ne01), 1.04 {I8} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.45 {I10} (1974Pr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.0 {I1} (1998Ne01), 0.55 {I5} (1991Me06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.45 {I15} (1974Pr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M linear polarization (1998Ne01) perhaps consistent with E2 
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.0 {I2} (1998Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M linear polarization (1998Ne01) perhaps consistent with E2 
I|g(30|')/I|g(90|')=1.2 {I2} (1998Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI branching: I|g(611)/I|g(1036)=3.6 (1968Pe13), 4.6 (1973BeYM). 
M from |a(K)exp in {+196}Tl |e decay. 
MR based upon |a(K)exp=0.028 {I5} (1973BeYM), 0.021 {I5} (1968Pe13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E an unobserved interband transition is proposed on the basis of the following observations: 724|g is seen in coincidence with 223|g, 386|g and 556|g; I(696|g) is found to be lower by about 15% than the 223|g, 556|g and 690|g in all coincidence spectra obtained by gating on the 386|g and higher-spin transition in the negative-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M deduced from ce(K)(278)/ce(K)(223) in the spectra in coin with 96|g and K/L (1983Gu05). 
E,RI |DE,I|g estimated by evaluator. 
RI from (10+) to 9- level, Branching|<3% (1983He14) in (|a,4n|g). Others: Branching|?5% (1991Me06) in (|a,6n|g); |<15% proposed by 1981Kr04, not confirmed in the spectrum gated by 223|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M from DCO=0.87 {I18} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.30 {I5}; A{-4}/A{-0}=0.01 {I7} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=90 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
M from DCO=0.99 {I5} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.36 {I2}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.05 {I3} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI 70 relative to 426|g as 1000 (1981Kr04) 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.31 {I2}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.06 {I3} (1983He14). 
M from DCO=1.12 {I5} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=130 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
M from DCO=0.97 {I5} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.34 {I1}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.06 {I2} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
This interband transition has not been detected in other even-A Hg nuclei (1983He14). 
M from DCO=0.55 {I5} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.34 {I5}; A{-4}/A{-0}=0.05 {I7} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M from DCO=0.40 {I16} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.55 {I5}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.06 {I9} (1983He14). 
Sidefeeding transition populating positive-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI corrected for contributions from unresolved lines in {+195}Hg and {+197}Au (1983He14). I|g=220 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
M from DCO=1.00 {I5} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.27 {I2}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.01 {I3} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M from DCO=0.58 {I11} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
This interband transition has not been detected in other even-A Hg nuclei (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M from DCO=0.97 {I4} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.31 {I3}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.06 {I4} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M from DCO=1.00 {I7} (1991Me06) and known J|p. 
RI I|g=90 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
M A{-2}/A{-0}=0.31 {I2}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.05 {I3} both contains 40% contribution from the 411.8|g 2+ to 0+ transition in {+198}Hg (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M stretched quadrupole transition, DCO ratio R=1.16 {I14} (1993Ce04) 
RI estimated from figure 1 of 1993Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted av: 426.09 {I8} (1962Wa16), 426.13 {I15} (1961Be14) 
M supported by |a(L+M)exp=0.009 {I3} (1952St40); E2 theory: |a(L)=0.0095, |a(M)=0.0024. 
M K/L=2.75 {I28} (1958An52), E2 theory: K/L=2.92 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M based upon |a(K)exp=0.014 {I8} (1973BeYM). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.018, |a(K)(E2)=0.0060. The measurement of |a(K)exp is not sufficiently accurate to permit choosing between E2 and M1. |DJ=2 from decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M based upon low limit for I|g, |a(K)exp>0.06; theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.0012, |a(K)(M2)=0.015. Supported by log| {Ift}=10.3, deduced from level feeding. 
TI 0.0040 {I12} from ce (1973BeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI required for intensity balance at 426 level. 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g=222 {I33} includes 1.84-h component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI required for intensity balance at 1062 level 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g=125 {I19} includes 1.84-h component 
M supported by |a(K)exp=0.014 {I4} (1968Pe13), 0.012 (1973BeYM). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
TI required for intensity balance at 1757 level 
E identified in conversion electron spectrum (1968Pe13) 
M L1:L2:L3=<0.07:1.00 {I4}:0.97 {I4}; M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5)=<0.3:1.00 {I7}:0.96 {I7}:0.028 {I16}; L/M=4.0 {I4}; M/N=3.4 {I4} (1960Ju01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=0.21 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1983He14). Others: A{-2}=0.26 {I2} (1984Go06), A{-2}=0.48 {I10} (1974Pr13). 
TI$1000 (2006Le06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=0.18 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1983He14). Others: A{-2}=0.30 {I2} (1984Go06); A{-2}=0.45 {I10} (1974Pr13). 
RI others: I|g=950 (1981Kr04); 810 {I50} (1984Go06); 880 {I40} (1974Pr13). 
TI$801 {I9}(2006Le06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI I|g=390 {I50} (1984Go06); 410 {I40} (1974Pr13). 
TI$372 {I6}(2006Le06) 
M A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}; A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1983He14). A{-2}=-0.08 {I1} (1984Go06). A{-2}=-0.11 {I15} (1974Pr13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.23 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1983He14). A{-2}=0.43 {I8} (1984Go06). Others: A{-2}=0.31 {I4} (1980Kr21), A{-2}=0.50 {I15} (1974Pr13). 
RI others: I|g=430 (1981Kr04); 250 {I40} (1984Gu06); 320 {I30} (1974Pr13). 
TI$170 {I3}(2006Le06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M (L1+L2)/L3=1.3 {I2} (1983Gu05). 
RI I|g=4 from 1981Kr04. 
TI$235 {I25}(2006Le06) 
M from L-subshell intensity ratio (1981Kr04), and A{-2}=0.30 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.00 {I6} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI derived from the coincidence data (1983He14). 
1983He14 find mutually coincidence 300.5|g and 301.5|g, but neither transition occurs in coincidence with the 84|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI others: I|g=240 (1981Kr04); I|g=150 {I30} (1974Pr13). 
M deduced from K/L=1.2 {I1} (1983Gu05) and A{-2}=0.30 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1983He14). A{-2}=0.46 {I15} (1974Pr13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=-0.29 {I5}; A{-4}=0.19 {I7} (1983He14). 
E placed by 1983He14 as defining the 8- level. 1981Kr04 show a tentative 8- to 7- 301|g, and 1983Gu05 define the 8- by a 217.2|g to 7-, with mult=M1+E2, |d=0.55 from K/L=4.9 {I5}. 1983He14 pointed out that the isotopic assignment of 217 K conversion line must be questioned. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M form A{-2}=0.23 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1983He14). Others: A{-2}=0.26 {I4} (1980Kr21), A{-2}=0.56 {I15} (1974Pr13). 
RI 723|g/478|g=44(5)/32(4) (1980Kr21); I|g=400 (1981Kr04). I|g=260 {I30} (1974Pr13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M deduced from ce(K)(278)/ce(K)(223) in the spectra in coin with 96|g and K/L=5 (1983Gu05). 
RI branching intensity from 10+ to 9- level: |<15% supposed by 1981Kr04, not confirmed in the spectrum gated by 223|g; Branching|<3% (1983He14); |?5% (1991Me06) 
TI$0.3 {I1}(2006Le06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 1974Pr13 placed 97|g from 10+ to 8+. 
TI$2.7 {I3}(2006Le06) 
M (L1+L2)/L3=1.3 {I2} (1983Gu05). 
M from L-subshell intensity ratio (1981Kr04); A{-2}=0.27 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (1983He14). A{-2}=0.6 {I2} (1974Pr13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI other: I|g=190 relative to 426|g (1981Kr04). I|g=70 {I20} (1974Pr13) 
M from A{-2}=0.31 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} (1983He14). A{-2}=0.6 {I2} (1974Pr13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 1974Pr13 placed 405|g from 12+ to 10+. 
M from A{-2}=0.33 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1983He14). A{-2}=0.6 {I2} (1974Pr13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=0.32 {I6}; A{-4}=0.00 {I9} (1983He14). 
Sidefeeding transition populating positive-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=-0.80 {I11}; A{-4}=0.54 {I13} (1983He14). 
Sidefeeding transition populating positive-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=90 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
M from A{-2}=0.36 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=0.30 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.16 {I6} (1983He14). 
Sidefeeding transition populating positive-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=-0.98 {I3}; A{-4}=0.23 {I6} (1983He14). 
Sidefeeding transition populating positive-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=130 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
M from A{-2}=0.34 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
This interband transition has not been detected in other even-A Hg nuclei (1983He14). 
M from A{-2}=-0.34 {I5}; A{-4}=0.05 {I7} (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=-0.55 {I5}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1983He14). 
Sidefeeding transition populating positive-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI corrected for contributions from unresolved lines in {+195}Hg and {+197}Au (1983He14). It is possible that I|g(278|g)=220 of 1983Gu05 were also affected by such impurities. 
Placement is based on the scheme of 1983He14. 
M stretched quadrupole from A{-2}=0.27 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1983He14). But mult=E1 deduced from ce(K)(278)/ce(K)(223) in the spectra in coin with 96|g and K/L=5 (1983Gu05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=90 relative to 426|g as 1000, |g ray not placed in level scheme (1981Kr04). 
RI derived from the coincidence data (1983He14). 
M A{-2}=0.31 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} both contains 40% contribution from the 411.8|g 2+ to 0+ transition in {+198}Hg (1983He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E an unobserved interband transition is required on the basis of the following observations: 724|g is seen in coincidence with 223|g, 386|g and 556|g; I(696|g) is found to be lower by about 15% than the 223|g, 556|g and 690|g in all coincidence spectra obtained by gating on the 386|g and higher-spin transition in the negative-parity band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI from I|g(278|g)=19 and authors' statement that branching of 278|g from 2342 level is |?5%. 
M from band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from discussion in the text of the paper, based on R(ADO) ratio 
$R(ADO)=0.67 {I12}, POL=+0.04 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$7.425 {I23} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(426.0)/I|g(355.7|g)=7.422 {I76}, 7.583 {I73}, 7.482 {I55}, 7.423 {I87}, 7.358 {I130} and 7.400 {I24}. I|g(426.0)/I|g(355.7|g)=7.425 {I30} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1974HeYW. Others: 133.94 {I5} (1961Ju05), 134.0 {I1} (1970Pl05), 133.88 {I5} (1972Wi21), 133.99 {I7} (1979Br12) 
L1:L2:L3=26 {I3}:145 {I9}:100 {I5} (1959Va13), 17 {I4}:132 {I14}:100 (1970Pl05), 26 {I3}:137 {I10}:100 (1972Pa40) 
K/L=0.42 (1951Hu17), 0.46 {I2} (1959Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E from 1972Wi21. Others: 165.0 {I1} (1970Pl05), 164.75 {I15} (1974HeYW) 
RI from I(|g+ce)(134|g,E2)=I(|g+ce)(165|g,M4). Others: 0.95 {I10} (1965Ha15), 0.6 {I2} (1967Bu22), 0.93 {I10} (1970Pl05), 0.99 {I7} (1977Re03), 0.72 (1951Hu17) from I(ce(K) 165|g)/I(ce(K) 134|g)=1.45 
L1:L2:L3=54 {I3}:13 {I1}:100 {I3} (1959Va13), 58 {I6}:13 {I3}:100 (1970Pl05), 59.1 {I16}:14.4 {I3}:100 (1972Br02) 
K/L=0.44 (1951Hu17), 0.25 (1952Co01), 0.28 {I1} (1959Va13) 
|a(exp)=340 {I5} (1987Vi08), 350 {I90} (1957Co49), 275 {I19} (1977Re03); |a(K)exp=47 {I12} (1977Re03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E from 1961Ju05, ce s 
RI derived from % absolute |g ray intensity I|g=0.0042 {I11} (1993Ch44) and |a=227. Other: I|g=0.061 {I14} deduced from ce(M1)=2.2 {I5} (1961Ju05), |a(M1)=36. 
M from M1:M2:M3=6: |<1: |<0.6 (1961Ju05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI other: 63 {I5} (1973Va26) 
M from K:(L1+L2):L3=100:17 {I1}:0.25 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.38 {I4} (1961Ju05); |a(L)exp=0.35 {I5} (1973Va26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g coin; I|g(307.8|g+308.6|g)=36 {I3} (1973Va26) 
M doublet |a(K)exp=0.20 {I2} (1973Va26), 0.24 {I5} (1961Ju05); K/L=4.2 {I9}, (L1+L2)/L3|?7 (1961Ju05); |a(K)exp=0.20 is compatible with pure M1 and E2 components. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 1.880, LC= 0.317, MC= 0.0738, NC+=0.02377, CC=2.295 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.304, LC= 0.487, MC= 0.1262, NC+= 0.0395, CC=0.956 IF MULT=E2 
E other: 156.3 {I3} (1961Ju05) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.6 {I1} (1961Ju05), 0.7 {I2} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.1219, |a(L)=0.02018, |a(M)=0.00468, |a(N+..)=0.00149, |a=0.1482 if mult=M1; 
|a(K)=0.0283, |a(L)=0.00974, |a(M)=0.00242, |a(N+..)=0.00076, |a=0.0412 if mult=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.05 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.120 {I11} (1961Ju05), 0.126 {I12} (1979Br12); K/L=6.0 {I7} (1961Ju05), 6.0 {I9} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
KC= 0.1073, LC=0.01777, MC=0.00412, NC+=0.00131, CC=0.1305 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.0254, LC=0.00833, MC=0.00206, NC+=0.00065, CC=0.0364 IF MULT=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.041 {I13} (1961Ju05). Other: |?0.14 (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI other: 18 {I2} (1973Va26) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.124 {I11} (1961Ju05), 0.104 {I14} (1973Va26), 0.13 {I2} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
KC= 0.1028, LC=0.01701, MC=0.00394, NC+=0.00126, CC=0.1250 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.02449, LC=0.00790, MC=0.00195, NC+=0.00061, CC=0.0350 IF MULT=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.054 {I14} (1961Ju05), 0.036 {I5} (1973Va26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g coin; doublet I|g=6.3 {I9} (1973Va26) 
M doublet |a(K)exp=0.054 {I19} (1961Ju05), 0.056 {I11} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC= 0.0855, LC=0.01415, MC=0.00327, NC+=0.00105, CC=0.1040 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.02101, LC=0.00633, MC=0.00156, NC+=0.00049, CC=0.0294 IF MULT=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.066 {I16} (1973Va26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC=0.02384, LC=0.00388, CC=0.0290 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00763, LC=0.00159, CC=0.00975 IF MULT=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.014 {I3} (1961Ju05), 0.010 {I2} (1973Va26), 0.017 {I4} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2,M1]
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.00872, |a(L)=0.00189, |a=0.0112 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.0284, |a(L)=0.00463, |a=0.0345 if mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2,M1]
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.00830, |a(L)=0.00178, |a=0.0107 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.0266, |a(L)=0.00434, |a=0.0324 if mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC= 0.0361, LC=0.00590, CC=0.0439 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.01050, LC=0.00242, CC=0.01372 IF MULT=E2 
M from |a(K)exp|?0.016 (1973Va26), 0.015 {I4} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.01280, |a(L)=0.00207, |a=0.0156 if mult=M1 
M from |a(K)exp=0.049 {I13} (1961Ju05), 0.036 {I7} (1973Va26), 0.063 {I14} (1979Br12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC= 0.0626, LC=0.01033, CC=0.0764 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.01628, LC=0.00441, CC=0.02214 IF MULT=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.045 {I11} (1973Va26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.00580, |a(L)=0.00093, |a=0.00704 if mult=M1; 
|a(K)=0.00267, |a(L)=0.00045, |a=0.00327 if mult=E2 
M from |a(K)exp=0.004 {I2} (1979Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Doublet |g(|q): A{-2}=-0.36 {I8} (1977Ke18) 
M from doublet |a(K)exp and ce ratio data; see {+197}Tl |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0436, |a(L)=0.01848, |a(M)=0.00465, |a(N+..)=0.00145, |a=0.0682 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.2007, |a(L)=0.0334, |a(M)=0.00774, |a(N+..)=0.00247, |a=0.244 if mult=M1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.36 {I13} (1977Ke18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.01727, |a(L)=0.00479, |a=0.0236 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.0674, |a(L)=0.01112, |a=0.0822 if mult=M1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.45 {I10} (1977Ke18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.00903, |a(L)=0.00198, |a=0.0117 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.0297, |a(L)=0.00484, |a=0.0361 if mult=M1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-1.0 {I1} (1977Ke18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.00616, |a(L)=0.00122, |a=0.00778 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.01796, |a(L)=0.00292, |a=0.0218 if mult=M1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.7 {I2} (1977Ke18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other: 408.7 {I2} (1978Me11) 
|a(K)exp|<0.015 (1977Ke18) ce(K)/I|g normalized to |a(K)(426|g, E2, {+196}Hg) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=0.39 {I6} (1977Ke18), 0.20 {I10} (1974Pr09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.01045, |a(L)=0.00240, |a=0.0136 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.0359, |a(L)=0.00586, |a=0.0437 if mult=M1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-1.0 {I3} (1977Ke18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=0.38 {I7} (1977Ke18), 0.37 {I5} (1978Me11), 0.37 {I10} (1974Pr09) 
B(E2)(25/2- to 21/2-)=0.31 {I2}; analogs: 0.38 {I2} ({+195}Hg), 0.33 {I1} ({+193}Hg), 0.35 {I3} ({+191}Hg) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.00468, |a(L)=0.00087, |a=0.00584 if mult=E2; 
|a(K)=0.01240, |a(L)=0.00201, |a=0.0151 if mult=M1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-1.0 {I2} (1977Ke18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.043 {I9} (1978Me11) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=0.34 {I5} (1978Me11) 
B(E2)(33/2+ to 29/2+)>0.06; analogs: >0.12 ({+195}Hg), 0.25 {I1} ({+193}Hg), 0.27 {I2} ({+191}Hg) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR From A{-2}=-0.290 {I16} (1971Pa06). 
|a(K)exp|?0.015 (1968Pe13), 0.0224 {I19} (1954El04, {+198}Au |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp>0.1 (1971Be09), photon unobserved 
TI From ce(K)(1401.7|g)/I|g(989.7|g)=0.011 {I2} (1971Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0112 {I28} (1971Be09) 
MR From A{-2},A{-4} (1971Pa06,1971Be09). Other: |?0.05 from |a(K)exp (1971Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0057 {I14} (1971Be09) 
MR From |a(K)exp. Value is consistent with A{-2}, A{-4} (1971Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M Deduced from ce(K)/I|g (see 1971Be09, Fig. 1) by evaluator 
MR Consistent with A{-2}, A{-4} (1971Be09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Deduced from average of L- and M-subshell energies (1957An55). 
RI From 1971Pa06. Other: 0.7 {I1} (1971Be09) 
M From L1:L2:L3=2.5 {I8}:100:98 {I8}, M2:M3=1.0 {I1} (1957An55), |a(L)exp|?120 (1971Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp (1971Be09) in {+198}Tl |e decay (1.87 h). 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1977Gu05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Others: 411.8044 (1980Iw03), 411.795 {I9} (1963Mu05,1965Mu03) ce; 411.794 {I8} (1971He20) data of 1963Mu05, 1965Mu03 reevaluated. 
|a(K)exp=0.0302 {I3} from weighted average of 0.0302 {I4} (1965Be07), 0.0305 {I10} (1961Pe07), 0.03035 {I45} (1973El10). |a(exp)=0.0445 {I9} (1980Iw03). Other |a(K)exp: 0.0295 {I15}, 0.0305 {I15} (1972Sa34); 0.0311 {I12} (1969Sa31) K| x-ray/I|g; 0.0302 {I4} (1965Be07); 0.0299 {I7} (1965LeZZ) |b|g coin; 0.0296 {I9} (1965LeZZ) |bce coin. 
For other |a(K)exp dependent on 961|b spectrum shape factor, see 1952Si25, 1959Wa17, 1962Ha25, 1963Le11, 1964Pa20, 1965Ke04, 1965Pa08, 1972Na22. 
Other recommended values: |a(K)exp=0.0301 {I2}, |a(exp)=0.044 {I2} (1984HaZS). 
K:L1:L2:L3=673 {I13}:100:105 {I2}:45 {I1} (1959Ke20), 687 {I7}:100 {I1}:101 {I1}:45 {I1} (1964He19); L1:L2:L3=100:103 {I1}:44.6 {I4} (1969MaZU); K:L:M:N:O=269 {I2}:100:25.2 {I5}:7.7 {I4}:1.8 {I2} (1959Ke20); M1:M2:M3:M4+M5=192 {I13}:221 {I15}:100:3 {I2}, O/N=0.21 {I3} (1972Dr02). 
1965Pe05 deduce E2 particle parameters, |a(K)exp=0.0308 {I9} from |g|g(|q), |gce(|q) 
1965Ra07 measure ce transverse pol via 961|b(ce(K) 412|g) cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp: 0.0224 {I19} (1954El04), 0.019 {I5} (1956Vo20). 
|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.290 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.187 {I29} (1973Di15); A{-2}=-0.290 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.183 {I24} (1974Ka18). 
E others: 675.8874 {I19} (1980Iw03), 675.878 {I18} (1964Ka17) ce spectrometer, 675.879 {I18} (1971He20) semi, 675.871 {I18} (1974HeYW) semi, 675.8727 {I38} (1976Bo16) cryst (675.890 {I4} when corrected for the {+198}Au line E|g=411.8044 or 675.886 {I4} relative to 411.8020. 
MR From A{-2}=-0.290 {I16} (1971Pa06, {+198}Tl |e decay (5.3 h) ). Other: 1.06 {I16} from |a(K)exp=0.0224 {I19} (1954El04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp: 0.00450 {I31} (1954El04), 0.0046 {I6} (1956Vo20). 
E Others: 1087.6856 {I17} (1980De40) cascade |g's, 1087.69 {I3} (1964Ka17) ce spectrometer, 1087.671 {I24} (1971He20) semi, 1087.663 {I24} (1974HeYW) semi. 
|a(K)exp: 0.0045 {I3} (1954El04), 0.0046 {I6} (1956Vo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. 2021Su02 list 47.7 keV 
M$from {+198}Hg Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database. 
$In Table III, 2021Su02 give B(E2)(W.u.)=28 {I1}, same as listed in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(97.3)/I|g(524.1)=6.0/19 in 1977Gu05, with estimated uncertainty of 15% in I|g value. 
M$from {+198}Hg Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 
$In Table III, 2021Su02 give B(E2)(W.u.)=48 {I3}. Compiler obtains 51 {I8}; |?49 in ENSDF database. It appears that 2021Su02 have not considered uncertainty in the |g-ray branching ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Previous assignment of this |g ray from a 5284, (20+) level is revised in the present work, based on |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from {+199}Hg IT decay 
The B(E5)(W.u.) value is considerably higher than the syst (1973Ra32) values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$absolute measurement with 4|p(|b|g): I|g=36.8% {I11} (1963Ha16) 
M |a(K)exp=0.284 {I11}, |a(L1)exp=0.0387 {I8}, |a(L2)exp=0.252 {I3}, |a(L3)=0.172, |a(M)exp=0.121 {I8}, |a(N)exp=0.0304 {I20}, normalized to theoretical |a(L3) (1977Dr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$L1:L2:L3=7.85 {I12}: 0.902 {I20}: 0.157 {I23}, M1:M2:M3= 1.77 {I4}: 0.244 {I14}: 0.063 {I18} (1977Dr06), sign from: |d=-0.017 {I6} from ce|g(|q) (1968Th03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$L1:L2:L3=0.114 {I2}: 0.0218 {I5}: 0.00692 {I10}, M1:M2:M3= 0.0261 {I8}: 0.0054 {I6}: 0.0021 {I3}, K:L:M=0.74 {I6}: 0.142 {I2}: 0.0337 {I10} normalized to theoretical |a(L3) (1977Dr06); sign of |d from Coul ex. theory: |a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.114 {I1}: 0.0210 {I3}: 0.0069 {I2}, |a(M1):|a(M2):|a(M3)=0.0261 {I1}: 0.00536 {I9}: 0.00183 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_comment:
RI average of 29.0 (1971Ka24) and 23.6 {I24} (1969Kl06) 
M from |a(K)exp=3.51 {I28}, |a(K)exp/(|a(exp)-|a(K)exp)=1.32 {I4} (1969Kl06); theory (M4): |a(K)=3.58, |a(K)/(|a-|a(K))=1.34. Also 1965Sm02, 1956Po14 
MR |g|g(|q) (1975Ed01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M L1/L3=61 {I12}, L2/L3=6 {I2}, L/M=4.8 {I5}, M/N=3.1 {I3}, N/O=5 {I2} (1960Ju03); theory: L1/L3=45 {I4}, L2/L3=5.1 {I5}, L/M=4.29 {I1} 
RI calculated from adopted branching ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.8 {I1} (1975Ma05); K/L=5.1 {I6}, L/M=4.4 {I5}, M/N=4.4 {I10}, L1/L3=20 {I10} (1960Ju03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M K/L=5.4 {I11}, L1/L2>20 (1960Ju03), |a(K)exp=0.5 {I1} (1975Ma05) 
$(247|g)[50|g](158|g)(|q): isotropic (1962Ba37) 
$(247|g)(208|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1962Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M non observation in ce spectrum of 1960Ju03 excludes a predominantly M1 transition, decay scheme excludes E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K/M>16 (1960Ju03), |a(K)exp=0.24 {I5} (1975Ma05) 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.42 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (1962Ba37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$rounded energy from 'adopted gammas' 
M$A{-2}=+0.44, +0.51; A{-4}=-0.42, -0.44 consistent with 1/2(E2)5/2(E2)1/2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.65 {I25} from A{-2}=-0.97, -1.06; A{-4}=0.00 which is consistent with 1/2(E2)3/2(M1+E2)1/2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(403|g)/I|g(195|g)=3.6 {I3} disagrees with 6.7 {I10} in 'adopted gammas' 
MR$from A{-2}=+0.097; A{-4}=+0.00 which is consistent with 1/2(E2)3/2(M1+E2)1/2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0395 {I8} (1961Le17), 0.0402 {I14} (1962Ja10), 0.0400 {I25} (1962Va10) and |a(K)exp=0.036 {I7} (1974Br02); |g(|q) in 1981He10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0093 {I3} (1987Su15) and 0.0081 {I11} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01 and 1971Ha09 
MR$From |d=-1.72 {I12} (2011Be36), -2.20 {I+16-5} (1989Ah01) and 2.8 {I+13-8} (1971Ha09) using |g|g(|q), and |a(K)exp=0.0093 {I3} (1987Su15) and 0.0081 {I11} (1974Br02), and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0033 {I7} (1974Br02) and 0.0033 {I11} in {+200}Tl |e decay; A{-2}=0.27 {I5} (1984Kh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0071 {I13} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) (2011Be36,1989Ah01) 
MR$From 2011Be36. Other: +0.16 {I5} (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I17} (1987Su15), 0.0088 {I17} (1974Br02) and 0.0065 {I7} (1965Sa02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36,1989Ah01,1971Ha09,1957Li39 
MR$From +0.26 {I2} (2011Be36), +0.31 {I3} (1989Ah01), -0.27 {I+2-3} (1971Ha09) and -0.24 {I1} (1957Li39) using |g|g(|q), and |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I17} (1987Su15), 0.0088 {I17} (1974Br02) and the briccmixing program. The sign of |d is from 2011Be36 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I6} (1965Sa02), 0.0078 {I10} (1974Br02) and 0.0068 {I14} (1987Su15); |g|g(|q) (2011Be36,1989Ah01,1971Ha09) 
MR$From 1989Ah01. Others: 2.2 {I+3-4} (1971Ha09) and -0.09 {I15} (2011Be36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0062 {I7} in 1974Br02 and |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36,1989Ah01 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36. Other: +0.053 {I33} in 1989Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I9} (1987Su15) and 0.0058 {I8} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36,1989Ah01,1971Ha09 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36. Others: +0.047 {I+29-30} in 1989Ah01 and -0.01 {I4} in 1971Ha09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From {+200}Tl |e decay 
M$From |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(n,n') and |a(K)exp=0.030 {I5} in {+200}Tl |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I10} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36 and 1989Ah01 
MR$From |d=+0.03 {I5} (2011Be36) and -0.036 {I24} (1989Ah01) using |g|g(|q), and |a(K)exp=0.0054 {I10} (1974Br02), and the briccmixing program. The sign of |d is from 2011Be36 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0064 {I13} (1974Br02), 0.0056 {I9} (1987Su15) and 0.0050 {I8} (1965Sa02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01 and 1971Ha09 
MR$From |d=-0.38 {I15} (2011Be36) and -0.32 {I+6-10} (1989Ah01) using |g|g(|q), and |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I8} (1965Sa02) and 0.0056 {I9} (1987Su15), and the briccmixing program. The sign of |d is from 2011Be36. Other: 1.0 {I+2-5} from |g|g(|q) in 1971Ha09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36 and |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(n,n'|g); |a(K)exp=0.020 {I4} (1965Sa02) 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+200}Tl |e decay 
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36. Others (|g|g(|q)): -0.043 {I52} (1989Ah01), +0.07 (1965Sa02), 0.10 {I2} (1971Ha09) and 1.0 {I1} (1957Li39); |a(K)exp=0.020 {I5} (1974Br02) and 0.025 {I3} (1965Sa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+200}Tl |e decay 
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36. Others: |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I32} (1974Br02) and 0.0070 {I14} (1965Sa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp<0.004 (1972Cu07) and |g(|q) in {+198}Pt(|a,2n|g) and DCO in {+198}Pt({+9}Be,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I17} in 1974Br02 and 0.0042 {I5} (1965Sa02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36,1989Ah01,1971Ha09,1965Sa02 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36; Others: -0.14 {I4} in 1971Ha09, -0.25 in 1965Sa02 and +0.120 {I+43-47} in 1989Ah01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I8} in 1974Br02 and 0.007 {I3} (1965Sa02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36 and 1989Ah01 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36; Other: +0.87 {I+18-14} in 1989Ah01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0031 {I4} in 1974Br02; |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36 and 1989Ah01 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36; Other: +0.003 {I13} in 1989Ah01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From DCO in {+198}Pt({+9}Be,|a3n|g). Note, that Mult=M1+E2 is given in {+198}Pt(|a,2n|g) based on |g(|q) (1981He10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.008 {I3} (1977Gu05); DCO in {+198}Pt({+9}Be,|a3n|g) and |g(|q) in {+198}Pt(|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0395 {I8} (1961Le17), 0.0402 {I14} (1962Ja10), 0.0400 {I25} (1962Va10) and 0.030 {I4} (1965Sa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.102 {I9}, A{-4}=0.021 {I14}, from 579.30|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; A{-2}=0.102, A{-4}=0.009 from 579.28|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1965Sa02; A{-2}=0.148 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I39} from 579.28|e, 367.94|g coin. in 1965Sa02; |a(K)exp=0.016 {I2} (1965Sa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I7}, A{-4}=1.10 {I12} from 661.36|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; |a(K)exp=0.023 {I6} (1965Sa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.20 {I9}, A{-4}=0.32 {I17} from 886.20|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; |a(K)exp=0.036 {I11} (1965Sa02) 
MR$2.8 {I+13-8} from |g|g(|q) in 1971Ha09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.040 {I21}, A{-4}=0.06 {I4} from 1205.75|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; A{-2}=0.078 {I6}; A{-4}=0.029 {I9} from 1205.70|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1965Sa02; |a(K)exp=0.0065 {I7} (1965Sa02) 
MR$Others: -0.24 {I1} (1957Li39), -0.27 {I+2-3} (1971Ha09) and -0.25 (1965Sa02)from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.26 {I4}; A{-4}=0.25 {I7} from 1225.50|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I6} (1965Sa02) 
MR$Other: 2.2 {I+3-4} from |g|g(|q) in 1971Ha09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.24 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} from 1273.43|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09 
MR$Other: -0.01 {I4} using |g|g(|q) in 1971Ha09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1362.9 keV {I3} in 1971Ko03 
M$A{-2}=0.49 {I8}; A{-4}=0.19 {I13} from 1362.2|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I8} (1965Sa02) 
MR$Other: 1.0 {I+2-5} using |g|g(|q) in 1971Ha09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.057 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.015 {I15} from 828.32|g, 579.30|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; A{-2}=-0.031 {I21}, A{-4}=0.007 {I29} from 828.27|g, 579.28|g coin. in 1965Sa02; |a(K)exp=0.025 {I3} (1965Sa02) 
MR$Others (|g|g(|q)): 0.10 {I2} (1971Ha09), +0.07 (1965Sa02) and 1.0 {I1} (1957Li39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ko03 
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.38 {I2}; A{-4}=0.01 {I3} from 1407.64|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; Other: |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I6} (1965Sa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ko03 
M$A{-2}=0.14 {I3}; A{-4}=0.11 {I5} from 1514.90|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1971Ha09; A{-2}=0.104 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.017 {I20} from 1514.90|g, 367.94|g coin. in 1965Sa02; |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I5} (1965Sa02) 
MR$Other: -0.14 {I4} and -0.25 from |g|g(|q) in 1971Ha09 and 1965Sa02, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.02 (1977Gu05); A{-2}/A{-0}=0.22 {I2}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.06 {I4} (1981He10), consistent with J to J E1 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.008 {I3} (1977Gu05); A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.24 {I1}; A{-4}/A{-0}=0.05 {I2} (1981He10) 
E$The ordering of 573.5|g and 396.6|g is reversed compared to 1977Gu05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.046 {I7} (1977Gu05); A{-2}/A{-0}=0.33 {I3}; A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.07 {I4} (1981He10) 
E$The ordering of 573.5|g and 396.6|g is reversed compared to 1977Gu05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$From total |a deduced using intensity balance in 1999Go21, but the value was not reported by the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$ Other: -2.20 {I+16-5} (1989Ah01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0093 {I3} (1987Su15) and 0.0081 {I11} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ Other: +0.16 {I5} (1989Ah01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0071 {I13}; |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0077 {I17} (1987Su15) and 0.0088 {I17} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 
MR$ Other: +0.31 {I3} (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(339.4|g)/I|g(1225.44|g) in 1987Su15 and I|g(1225.44|g)=40 from 1974Br02 
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I8} (1987Su15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0068 {I14} (1987Su15) and 0.0078 {I10} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 
MR$From 1989Ah01; Other: -0.09 {I15} (2011Be36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0062 {I7}; |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 
MR$ Other: +0.53 {I33} (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I9} (1987Su15) and 0.0058 {I8} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 
MR$ Other: +0.047 {I+29-30} (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I10}; |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 
MR$From 1989Ah01. Other: +0.03 {I5} in 2011Be36 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0056 {I9} (1987Su15) and 0.0064 {I13} (1974Br02); |g|g(|q) in 2011Be36, 1989Ah01, 1974Br02 
MR$ Other: -0.38 {I15} (2011Be36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I5}; |g|g(|q) (2011Be36,1989Ah01) 
MR$ Other: -0.043 {I52} from |g|g(|q) (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0070 {I17}; |g|g(|q) (2011Be36,1989Ah01,1974Br02) 
MR$ Other: +0.10 {I4} (2011Be36) and +0.120 {I+43-47} (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I8}; |g|g(|q) (2011Be36,1989Ah01,1974Br02) 
MR$ Other: +0.87 {I+18-14} (1989Ah01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From 1997Ge09. Other: 1.565 keV {I6} (1987Dr06) 
M,MR$From 1987Dr06, based on N1/N2=1.2 {I2}, N1/N3=1.1 {I2}, N2/N3=0.92 {I15}, N4/N3=0.03 {I2} and N5/N3=0.04 {I2}. Other: |d=0.0145 {I+19-14} from N1/N2=0.94 {I31}, N1/N3=0.60 {I20}, N2/N3=0.64 {I5}, N4/N3=0.042 {I18}, N5/N3=0.043 {I23}, N4/N5=0.98 {I16}, O2/N3=0.158 {I30}, O3/N3=0.20 {I4}, O1/O3=0.64 {I12}, {I32}, O1/O2=0.81 O1/N3=0.128 {I30} and O2/O3=0.79 {I19} in 1997Ge09 
CC$4.7|*10{+4} {I7} from 1987Dr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From nuclear resonant scattering in 2005Is19. Other: 26.34 keV {I7} in 1983Sc38 
M,MR$From M1:M2:M3=100:12.0 {I20}:1.5 {I7} in 1983Sc38 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed directly, but required from the ce-|g coincidence data in 1983Sc38. E|g from level energy differences 
$B(M1)(W.u.) |? 0.0067 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From L3:L1=0.0136 {I21}, L2:L1=0.105 {I11} and L3:L2=0.130 {I24} in 1983Sc38; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N:O1=50.9 {I40}:5.0 {I6}:0.56 {I8}:14.2 {I15}:1.5 {I5}:4.0 {I5}:0.70 {I15} in 1960He05; A{-2}(135.5|g-30.6|g(|q))=0.159 {I26} in 1975Ho08 
MR$From L3/L1, L2/L1 and L3/L2 in 1983Sc38 and the briccmixing program. Others: |<0.03 from |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08; -0.0634|<|d|<+0.0515 from |g|g(|q) in 1978No06; 0.006 {I16} from from L1:L2:L3 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 
$B(M1)(W.u.) |? 0.16 {I+12-5}, B(E2)(W.u.) |? 10 {I+15-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From L1:L2:L3=100:11.3 {I5}:1.75 {I15} in 1983Sc38; L3:L1=0.0130 {I20}, L2:L1=0.094 {I8}, L3:L2=0.138 {I24}, L:M=3.9 {I4}, M1:M2=8.4 {I3}, M:N=4.6 {I6} in 1960He05; A{-2}(135.5|g-32.2|g)(|q)=-0.193 {I28} in 1975Ho08 
MR$From L3/L1, L2/L1 and L3/L2 in 1983Sc38 and the briccmixing program. Others: |<0.03 from |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08; -0.0361|<|d|<+0.0506 from |g|g(|q) in 1978No06; 0.013 {I11} from from L1:L2:L3 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 
$B(M1)(W.u.) |? 0.14 {I+10-4}, B(E2)(W.u.) |? 20 {I+17-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N1=56.0 {I4}:7.9 {I7}:0.77 {I15}:0.07 {I3}: 2.2 {I3}:0.60 {I9}; |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08 and 1983Sc38 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08; other: 0.000 {I4} from K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N1 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N1:O1=100:14.6 {I12}:1.6 {I2}:0.18 {I4}:4.0 {I4}: 1.10 {I15}:0.27 {I6} in 1960He05 
MR$From K:L1:L2:L3 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |g(|q) (A{-2}=-0.047 {I24}) in Coulomb excitation (1980Bo05). other (alternative): |d=-4.5 {I+1.2-1.7} (1980Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |g(|q) (A{-2}=-0.144 {I22}) in Coulomb excitation (1980Bo05). |d=-0.23 {I9} or -1.8 {I3} (1980Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=4 {I2}, K/L=3.2 {I6}, L/M+=3.4 {I9} (1990Lo17). 
MR$From K/L=3.2 {I6}, L/M+=3.4 {I9} (1990Lo17) and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(135.34|g)/I|g(167.43|g) in adopted gammas and I|g(167.43|g)=53 {I5}; Other: 18 {I5} in 1972Pa24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(165.88|g)/I|g(167.43|g) in adopted gammas and I|g(167.43|g)=53 {I5}; Other: 0.7 from I(|g+ce) in 1972Pa24 and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(526.9|g)/I|g(552.8|g) in adopted gammas and I|g(552.8|g)=44 {I5} 
RI$From adopted gammas, normalized to I|g(553|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$a value of 35 {I4} in 1972Pa24 would lead to I|b=0.64% {I11} and log {Ift}=3.80 which seem too low 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1997Ge09. Other: 1.565 keV {I6} (1987Dr06) 
RI$Estimated by the evaluator from intensity balance and the adopted decay scheme 
M$From N1/N2=0.94 {I31}, N1/N3=0.60 {I20}, N2/N3=0.64 {I5}, N4/N3=0.042 {I18}, N5/N3=0.043 {I23}, N4/N5=0.98 {I32}, O1/O2=0.81 {I16}, O2/N3=0.158 {I30}, O3/N3=0.20 {I4}, O1/O3=0.64 {I12}, O1/N3=0.128 {I30} and O2/O3=0.79 {I19} subshell ratios in 1997Ge09 and N1/N2=1.2 {I2}, N1/N3=1.1 {I2}, N2/N3=0.92 {I15}, N4/N3=0.03 {I2} and N5/N3=0.04 {I2} subshell ratios in 1987Dr06. 
MR$From 1987Dr06; Other: 0.0145 {I+19-14} in 1997Ge09 
CC$4.7|*10{+4} {I7} from 1987Dr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. Others: 26.34 keV {I7} in 1983Sc38 
RI$0.082 {I10} from I(ce(M1))(26.27|g)/I(ce(L1))(32.19|g)=0.0131 {I15} in 1983Sc38,|a(M1)(26.27|g)=11.52 {I17} and |a(L1)(32.19|g)=27.3 {I4} and I|g(32.19|g)=2.63 {I5} from the present evaluation 
M,MR$From M1:M2:M3=100:12.0 {I20}:1.5 {I7} in 1983Sc38 and using the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed directly, but required from the ce-|g coincidence data in 1983Sc38. E|g from level energy differences 
RI$ Estimated by the evaluator from intensity balance and the adopted decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average 2.2 {I2} (1975Ho08), 3.10 {I13} (1976HiZN), 2.57 {I6} (1979De42), 2.60 {I8} (1983Fu22), 2.60 {I8} (1990Ka08) and 2.53 {I5} (1990Co07) 
M$From L3:L1=0.0136 {I21}, L2:L1=0.105 {I11} and L3:L2=0.130 {I24} in 1983Sc38; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N:O1=50.9 {I40}:5.0 {I6}:0.56 {I8}:14.2 {I15}:1.5 {I5}:4.0 {I5}:0.70 {I15} in 1960He05; A{-2}(135.5|g-30.6|g(|q))=0.159 {I26} in 1975Ho08 
MR$From L3/L1, L2/L1 and L3/L2 in 1983Sc38 and the briccmixing program. Others: |<0.03 from |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08; -0.0634|<|d|<+0.0515 from |g|g(|q) in 1978No06; 0.006 {I16} from from L1:L2:L3 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average 2.2 {I2} (1975Ho08), 2.85 {I12} (1976HiZN), 2.60 {I9} (1979De42), 2.60 {I7} (1983Fu22), 2.72 {I6} (1990Ka08) and 2.58 {I5} (1990Co07) 
M$From L1:L2:L3=100:11.3 {I5}:1.75 {I15} in 1983Sc38; L3:L1=0.0130 {I20}, L2:L1=0.094 {I8}, L3:L2=0.138 {I24}, L:M=3.9 {I4}, M1:M2=8.4 {I3} M:N=4.6 {I6} in 1960He05; A{-2}(135.5|g-32.2|g(|q))=-0.193 {I28} in 1975Ho08 
MR$From L3/L1, L2/L1 and L3/L2 in 1983Sc38 and the briccmixing program. Others: |<0.03 from |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08; -0.0361|<|d|<+0.0506 from |g|g(|q) in 1978No06; 0.013 {I11} from from L1:L2:L3 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average 26.5 {I13} (1975Ho08), 26.5 {I10} (1976HiZN), 26.4 {I3} (1979De42), 26.5 {I4} (1983Fu22), 27.2 {I5} (1990Ka08) and 25.65 {I18} (1990Co07). Other 27.3 {I2} (2004De02) 
M$From K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N1=56.0 {I4}:7.9 {I7}:0.77 {I15}:0.07 {I3}: 2.2 {I3}:0.60 {I9}; |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08; other: 0.000 {I4} from K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N1 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 1983Sc38 
RI$From the decay scheme and I|g(141.1|g)/I|g(135.34|g)=0.11 {I2}, using the 26|g as a gate in 1983Sc38, and by assuming I|b(5/2-,26.27 keV)=0.5%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.6 {I1} (1975Ho08), 1.80 {I20} (1976HiZN), 1.5 {I2} (1979De42), 1.46 {I20} (1983Fu22), 1.45 {I2} (1990Ka08) and 1.55 {I5} (1990Co07) 
M$From K:L1=1.65 {I20}:0.25 {I5} in 1960He05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From 1990Co07; others: 100 (1975Ho08), 100.0 {I17} (1976HiZN), 100.0 {I11} (1979De42), 100.0 {I10} (1983Fu22) and 100.0 {I12} (1990Ka08) 
M$From K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N1:O1=100:14.6 {I12}:1.6 {I2}:0.18 {I4}:4.0 {I4}: 1.10 {I15}:0.27 {I6} in 1960He05 
MR$From K:L1:L2:L3 in 1960He05 and the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Possibly a doublet. See adopted levels for details. 
M$A{-2}=-0.144 {I22} 
MR$|d=-0.23 {I9} or -1.8 {I3} (1980Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1975Co19 in {+202}Tl |e decay 
M$From K/L(exp)=2.6 and (L1+L2)/L3(exp)=3.5 (1953Be79), and |a(K)exp=0.03, |a(exp)=0.041, |a(L1)exp=0.0078, |a(L2)exp=0.0011, |a(L3)exp=0.0025 (1957Ha97). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From 1975Co19 in {+202}Tl |e decay 
RI$From 2019Ke01 in Coulomb Excitation 
M,MR$From 520|g-439|g(|q) in 1973BeYM [A{-2}=-0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I5}]; Other: A{-2}=0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=0.012 {I16} from |g(|q) in 2019Ke01, consistent with |DJ=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From 1989Ga07 in {+202}Hg(n,n'|g) 
RI$Weighted average of 11.7 {I12} (1984Ta09) in {+202}Tl |e decay, 13.0 {I14} (1975Br02) in {+201}Hg(n,|g) E=thermal, 14.9 {I12} (1989Ga07) in {+202}Hg(n,n'|g) and 14.0 {I3} (2019Ke01), 13.0 {I5} (1979Bo16), and 15.4 {I18} (1985Ag01) in Coulomb Excitation 
M$|a(K)exp(439|g)/|a(K)exp(961|g)=5.5 {I7} (1965Le04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I22} (2019Ke01); Other: A{-2}=0.40 {I3} (1989Ga07), |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 60 {I9} (1989Ga07), 50 {I5} (1975Br02), 36 (1984Sc19) 
M,MR$A{-2}=0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.039 {I54} (2019Ke01); Other: A{-2}=0.44 {I2} (1989Ga07), |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 20 (1984Sc19) and 17 {I8} (2019Ke01) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2637 {I403} using the adopted T{-1/2}, I|g and |a is anomalously high and violates RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 51 {I6} (2019Ke01), 59 {I6} (1975Br02), 50 {I4} (1989Ga07) and 58 {I5} (2021Su02). Other: 62 (1984Sc19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.28 {I11} (1989Ga07), |DJ=0 transition 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0067 {I27} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=14 {I6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.14 {I4} (1989Ga07), |DJ=0 transition 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0020 {I7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.80 {I29} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.12 {I4} if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=1337 {I475} if E2 using the adopted T{-1/2}, I|g and |a is anomalously high and violates RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I20} (1989Ga07) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.09 {I3} if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=680 {I240} if E2 using the adopted T{-1/2}, I|g and |a is anomalously high and violates RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=3.1 {I13} if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=1.6|*10{+5} {I6} if E2, both using the adopted T{-1/2}, I|g and |a are anomalously high and violates RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=1.0 {I3} if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=851 {I268} if E2 using the adopted T{-1/2}, I|g and |a seems anomalously high 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Unplaced in {+202}Hg(n,n'|g) and in Coulomb Excitation. Placed in 1997Sc07, based on the (n,n'|g) threshold which shows that this |g must deexcite a level at <2.5 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From 1984Sr01. Assigned by the authors to both {+202}Au and {+204}Au decays, but may also be due to {+203}Au decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From K/L(exp)=2.6 and (L1+L2)/L3(exp)=3.5 (1953Be79), and |a(K)exp=0.03, |a(exp)=0.041, |a(L1)exp=0.0078, |a(L2)exp=0.0011, |a(L3)exp=0.0025 (1957Ha97). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 0.410 {I6} (1959Bo47), 1.0 {I3} (1966Le06) 
M,MR$From 520|g-439|g(|q) in 1973BeYM [A{-2}=-0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I5}] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.075 {I6} (1984Ta09) and 0.074 {I5} (1965Le04). Others: 0.13 {I3} (1966Le06), 0.053 {I8} (1959Bo47) 
M$From |a(K)exp(439|g)/|a(K)exp(961|g)=5.5 {I7} (1965Le04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement based on adopted levels. Observed in coincidence with 351|g, 439|g, and 520|g in 1984Sc19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 23.4 {I7} (1985Ag01) 
M$From adopted gammas. A{-2}=0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=0.012 {I16} in 2019Ke01, consistent with |DJ=0 
MR$From adopted gammas 
$B(E2)(2{++}{-1} to 2{++}{-2})=0.034 e{+2}b{+2} {I7} in 1985Ag01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 282 {I9} in 1985Ag01 
M$From adopted gammas. A{-2}=0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I13} in 2019Ke01 
$B(E2)(4{++}{-1} to 2{++}{-1})=0.182 e{+2}b{+2} {I16} in 1985Ag01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$From 2019Ke01. Other: 0.026 {I5} in 1985Ag01 
M,MR$A{-2}=0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I22} in 2019Ke01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From adopted gammas. 
RI$Other: 32.8 {I10} in 1985Ag01 
$B(E2)(6{++}{-1} to 4{++}{-1})=0.175 e{+2}b{+2} {I15} in 1985Ag01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level-energy difference. 2021Su02 give 70.6 keV 
RI$From I|g(868.6|g)=11.2 {I11}, I|g(653.8|g)=100.0 {I28} and I|g(845.1|g)=18.7 {I13} determined from the 2021Su02 data by gating on |g rays above the (7-) level. Values reported to the evaluator by S. Tendel on June 19, 2023. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1973Me07. Other: 4922 in 1974Te01 
M$A{-2}=0.51 {I2}; polarization N(parallel)/N(perpendicular)=1.18 {I3} (1974Te01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+204}Au |b{+-} decay 
M$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g). 
$ ------------------------- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$From {+204}Au |b{+-} decay 
M$|DJ=0 dipole from excit. function and |g(|q) in (n,n'|g), electric character inferred from likely parity deduced for initial state. In ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g) data, an opposite sign for A{-2} is reported, and hence, |DJ=1 dipole, which is inconsistent with (n,n'|g). The evidence more strongly supports the former assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+204}Au |b{+-} decay 
$KC=0.019 10$LC=0.0033 14$MC=0.0008 3$NC+=0.00024 10 NC=0.00020 8$OC=3.7E-5 15$PC=2.6E-6 14 
M$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 
M$also confirmed that DJ=1 E1 ruled out by G(THETA) in (9BE). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+204}Au |b{+-} decay 
$CC=0.0048 17$KC=0.0039 14$LC=0.00063 21$MC=0.00015 5$NC+=0.00010 3 NC=3.7E-5 12$OC=6.9E-6 23$PC=5.3E-7 20$IPC=5.3E-5 13 
M$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$CC=0.0041 14$KC=0.0034 11$LC=0.00054 17$MC=0.00013 4$NC+=0.00013 4 NC=3.1E-5 10$OC=5.9E-6 19$PC=4.5E-7 16$IPC=8.9E-5 22 
E,RI$From {+204}Au |b{+-} decay. 
M$Inferred from known J|p's of initial and final levels, consistent with |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$CC=0.00197 3$KC=0.001432 20$LC=0.000227 4$MC=5.24E-5 8$NC+=0.000259 4 NC=1.311E-5 19$OC=2.47E-6 4$PC=1.85E-7 3$IPC=0.000243 4 
E,RI$From {+204}Au |b{+-} decay. 
$I(1947.76) compared to I(1511.1) is 5.31/100 in B-. But there is unc on the 100 (2.53), so the 100 may not actually be 100. Renormalizing results in relative uncs added in quadrature, = (5.31)*sqrt[(0.40/5.31)^2 + (2.53/100)^2] = 0.42 ~ 0.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$CC=0.0034 10$KC=0.0027 8$LC=0.00044 13$MC=0.00010 3$NC+=0.00019 5 NC=2.5E-5 8$OC=4.8E-6 14$PC=3.7E-7 12$IPC=0.00016 4 
M$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$CC=0.0034 10$KC=0.0026 8$LC=0.00042 12$MC=0.00010 3$NC+=0.00020 5 NC=2.4E-5 7$OC=4.6E-6 14$PC=3.5E-7 12$IPC=0.00017 4 
M$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$BE2(6->4) in Coulex = 0.139(17); BE2W = 0.007133 
$CC=0.00536 8$KC=0.00433 6$LC=0.000791 11$MC=0.000186 3$NC+=5.57E-5 8 NC=4.65E-5 7$OC=8.64E-6 12$PC=5.67E-7 8 
M$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and from Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) in ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g) and (n,n'|g) 
M$Although the A2 values deduced in (n,n'g) and (9Be,9Be'g) have opposite signs (+0.15 18 and -0.16 16, respectively), the uncertainties in both are large enough to be consistent with near-zero A2, indicating mixed M1+E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$CC=0.00184 3$KC=0.001540 22$LC=0.000229 4$MC=5.24E-5 8$NC+=1.87E-5 3 NC=1.308E-5 19$OC=2.47E-6 4$PC=1.87E-7 3$IPC=3.01E-6 5 
M$From ce and |g(|q) in (d,pn|g), and supported by |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From levels evergy difference; |g not observed, but inferred to exist in ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g) based on coin. relationships 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$KC=0.269 4$LC=0.0510 8$MC=0.01192 17$NC+=0.00349 5 NC=0.00294 5$OC=0.000523 8$PC=2.65E-5 4 
E,RI$From (|m{+-},n|g). 
M$From ce in (d,pn|g); stretched nature of transition is not confirmed in (d,pn|g), but it can be inferred from the known J|p's of the initial and final states 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$CC=0.001283 18$KC=0.000904 13$LC=0.0001324 19$MC=3.03E-5 5$NC+=0.00021 NC=7.56E-6 11$OC=1.429E-6 20$PC=1.107E-7 16$IPC=0.000206 3 
M$Inferred from known J|p's of initial and final states, supported by |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$CC=0.001284 18$KC=0.000493 7$LC=7.13E-5 10$MC=1.627E-5 23$NC+=0.000704 NC=4.07E-6 6$OC=7.70E-7 11$PC=6.07E-8 9$IPC=0.000699 10 
M$Inferred from known J|p's of initial and final states, supported by |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(d,pn|g) tentatively placed a 460.5|g from this level parallel to the 423.5|g. Evaluators have moved it to the 2761.2-keV level based on observation of 461.0|g in ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Observed in (d,pn|g), but placed tentatively in the level scheme. This transition was not confirmed in ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g), where a contaminant 570|g was identified. 
RI$Normalized to 497.7|g in (d,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$CC=0.001321 19$KC=0.000448 7$LC=6.47E-5 9$MC=1.476E-5 21$NC+=0.000793 NC=3.69E-6 6$OC=6.99E-7 10$PC=5.52E-8 8$IPC=0.000789 11 
E,RI$From {+204}Au |b{+-}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. E|g=436.56 keV {I5} in 1984Cr01 
$%IG=91.3 3, using the calculated normalization. $KC=0.0263 4$LC=0.00870 13$MC=0.00216 3$NC+=0.000636 9 $NC=0.000538 8$OC=9.50E-5 14$PC=3.47E-6 5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$KC=0.00991 14$LC=0.00224 4$MC=0.000538 8$NC+=0.0001603 23 NC=0.0001345 19$OC=2.45E-5 4$PC=1.313E-6 19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$CC=0.001321 19$KC=0.000448 7$LC=6.47E-5 9$MC=1.476E-5 21 $NC+=0.000793 1 NC=3.69E-6 6$OC=6.99E-7 10$PC=5.52E-8 8$IPC=0.000789 11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.19 {I11}, E1 ruled out by parallel 1405.0|g decay. 
M$AD is consistent with stretched E1 or M1, but the former gives J=1-, which means 1405.0 would be 1- --> 2+, i.e. E1 as well, inconsistent with its AD. Note that there cannot be an E2 component in 1+ --> 0+! 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.03 {I3}; J|p assignments by 1989Ga07 would require this |g to be E2, inconsistent with the deduced A{-2}. 
M$AD points to M1+E2 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.13 {I6}; |g to 0+ cannot be D with Q admixture or be |DJ=0, and pure dipole has A{-2}<0, thus this |g must be E2 despite the somewhat small value of A{-2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.68 {I11}; |g to 0+ cannot be D with Q admixture or be |DJ=0, and pure dipole has A{-2}<0, thus this |g must be E2 despite the somewhat large value of A{-2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I12}; J|p assignments by 1989Ga07 would require this |g to be Q, which is inconsistent with the deduced A{-2}. 
M$AD points to (D) assignment, and a contradiction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Value taken from table in 1984Sc19, which differs slightly from the energy shown in their level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Observed in |g|g coin but not placed in level scheme by 1984Sc19. Placement in the level scheme by the evaluators based on the 1107.7|g in (n,n'|g). See also the adopted level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$E1 assignment from ce (value not given in 1984Sc19), likely stretched from |g(|q), A{-2}=-0.12 {I11} (A4|&0). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement changed by evaluators from J=7 to degenerate J=(2) 2300.5-keV state based on the placement of the 1172.0|g in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Observed in |g|g coin but not placed in level scheme by 1984Sc19. Placement in the level scheme by the evaluators based on the 1386.2|g in (n,n'|g). See also the adopted level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement of this |g is changed to the 2761.1-keV level in adopted levels based on observation in ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.04 {I2}; small A{-2} value may be due to deorientation of the state. 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1841.2 5 0.3 --> not obs'd in 1994Po21 
RI$Intensities (BR) inferred from 1989Ga07 (n,n'g) -- 59%/41% 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.2 {I3}; 1994Po21 assign mult. Q based on |g(|q), but uncertainty is large enough to allow |DJ=0 or 1 D as well. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2117.4 5 0.2 --> not obs'd in 1994Po21 
RI$Intensities (BR) inferred from 1989Ga07 (n,n'g) -- 71%/29% 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.03 {I7}; A{-2} is surprisingly small, but this |g is associated with the 6+ to 4+ decay (see adopted level scheme) and is thus assigned as E2 here. 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement from degenerate 7- level based on adopted gammas. 
RI$Intensities (BR) inferred from 1989Ga07 (n,n'g) -- 21%/67%/12% 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement from degenerate (2+) level based on adopted gammas. 
RI$Intensities (BR) inferred from 1989Ga07 (n,n'g) -- 21%/67%/12% 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2239.1 5 2.5 --> not obs'd in 1994Po21 
RI$Intensities (BR) inferred from 1989Ga07 (n,n'g) -- 44%/56% 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Coincidence with 108.8|g proves this |g feeds the degenerate 7- level. 
M$A{-2}=0.3 {I5}. 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1979Bo16. 
$BE2=0.0849 8 [weighted average of 0.0846 10 (1981Es03) and 0.0854 12 (1979Bo16)]. 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$BE2=0.121 9 (1985Ag01), 0.19 6 (1981Es03). 
$1981Es03: M42=1.32 20 (destr.int.) or 1.30 20 (constr.int.); BE2(4+ -> 2+) = 26(9) W.u. = 0.19(6) (eb){+2} 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement of |g by 1985Ag01 consistent with adopted gammas (adopted E|g=1511.10). 
$1985Ag01: E=1510.9(5), RI=0.21(2); decays to 2+, fixes level E. 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement based on adopted gammas (adopted E|g=1552.8). 
$J=(2+) in adopted levels, no supporting evidence in Coulex, apart from the fact that it was observed at all.... 
$------------------------------ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by compiler from B(E4)(W.u.) for 1128 transition and level half-life=2.91 ps {I21} taken from {+204}Hg Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database. 
$B(E4)(W.u.): quoted by 2017St09 from 1989BuZP: Thesis, Univ.Amsterdam (1989)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
RI$compiler obtains 5.7 {I10} using B(E3)(W.u.)=20.5 {I17}, level T{-1/2}=161 fs {I21}, and relative intensities of other transitions from the 2675 level. This value disagrees with I|g<1.1 given by 2017St09 
$Other B(E3)(W.u.)=23 {I2} (from {+204}Hg Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|<0.05 in {+205}Au |b{+-} decay (1994We02); A{-2}=+0.18 {I1} in {+204}Hg(t,d|g) (1985Ma48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.08 {I2} in {+205}Au |b{+-} decay (1994We02); A{-2}=-0.11 {I4} in {+204}Hg(t,d|g) (1985Ma48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+205}Hg IT decay (1.09 ms) 
M$From intensity balance considerations in {+204}Hg({+9}Be,2|a|g) (1994Po21), and |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp in {+204}Hg(d,p|g) (1986Ze03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+205}Hg IT decay (1.09 ms) 
M$From intensity balance considerations in {+204}Hg({+9}Be,2|a|g) (1994Po21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$From |a{-T}(exp)=4.3 {I10} in {+204}Hg({+9}Be,2|a|g) (1994Po21), deduced from intensity balance considerations 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)=100 {I2} (1994We02) and |a. Other: 100 {I7} (2010FaZX) 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.05 (1994We02). This is an upper limit based on non observation of Hg K| x ray when gating on the 946.0|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)=63 {I2} (1994We02) and |a. Other: 51 {I5} (2010FaZX) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.08 {I2} (1994We02) from the observed Hg K| x ray yield when gating on the 813.1|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas 
RI$From I|g(879|g)/I|g(966|g)=0.1317 from adopted gammas and I|g(966|g)=7.0 {I18} in 1994We02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(966|g)/I|g(946|g)=0.16 {I4} using a 5 s implant-decay time correlated spectrum in 2010FaZX and I|g(946|g)=44 {I2} in 1994We02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(966|g)/I|g(946|g)=0.07 {I3} using a 5 s implant-decay time correlated spectrum in 2010FaZX and I|g(946|g)=44 {I2} in 1994We02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. 161.5|g from ce data in 1986Ze03 
M$From comparison between the relative intensities for the K and L subshell conversion electrons for 161.5|g and the corresponding hindrance factor. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Unobserved, but required from the intensity balance arguments. Deduced using the level's energy difference. 
RI$From the measured branching ratios of 19% {I1} (1985Ma48) and I|g(1015.63|g)=8.8 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=+0.22 {I2} in {+204}Hg(t,p|g) (1982Be38). The positive sign argues against a |DJ=1 transition; Mult.=M2 is excluded from systematics of first excited states in neighboring even-even nuclei 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.38 {I5} in {+204}Hg(t,p|g) (1982Be38). The measured ratio of A{-2}(1068|g)/A{-2}(1034|g)=0.58 {I9} is consistent with a J=5 to 2 transition for which A{-2}(2 to 0)/A{-2}(5 to 2)=0.6 can be expected, while A{-2}(2 to 0)/A{-2}(4 to 2)=1.0 could be expected if 1034|g were E2 (1982Be38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)(100|g)/I(|g+ce)(1257|g)=3.2 {I3}, determined using the I(|g+ce)(1157|g)/I(|g+ce)(1257|g) ratio in (HI,xn|g) (2001Fo08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.38 {I5} in 1982Be38. The measured ratio of A{-2}(1068|g)/A{-2}(1034|g)=0.58 {I9} is consistent with a |DJ=3 transition for which A{-2}(2+ to 0+)/A{-2}(5 to 2)=0.6 is expected, however A{-2}(2+ to 0+)/A{-2}(4 to 2)=1.0 if 1034|g was |DJ=2 (1982Be38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)(100|g)/I(|g+ce)(1257|g)=3.2 {I3}, determined using the I(|g+ce)(1157|g)/I(|g+ce)(1257|g) ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 277.4 {I5} from {+144}Sm({+42}Ca,p2n|g):E=209 MeV. 
M intensity balance at the 906 level is achieved if the 69|g and 277|g are assumed to have E1 and M1 multipolarity, respectively, in ({+42}Ca,p2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M if M2, hindrance would be comparable to that for 13/2+ to 9/2- transitions in {+195}Bi and {+197}At (2001Mu26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Uncertain transition, not confirmed in subsequent more extensive studies, so omitted from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M intensity balance at the 906 level is achieved if the 69|g and 277|g are assumed to have E1 and M1 multipolarity, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
M hindrance comparable to that for known 13/2+ to 9/2- transitions in {+195}Bi and {+197}At (2001Mu26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
E$deduced by compilers from level-energy difference 
TI$deduced by compilers from intensity balance at 444.8 level 
RI$deduced by compilers from I|g+ce and total conversion coefficient 
$Retardation factor=3.84|*10{+4} {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From |a{-tot}=0.3 {I2}, deduced by authors of 2003An26 ({+190}Bi |a decay: low spin) assuming cascade character of 105|g and 79|g. |a{-theo}=0.17 {I1} (E1), 3.1 {I1} (M1), and 16 {I1} (E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$From {+186}Tl IT decay. Other: 374.0~{I2} ({+32}S,5n|g),({+35}Cl,4n|g). 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.095 {I17} and K/L=1.5 {I9} in {+186}Tl IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 2020St11 
RI$From 2020St11. 
M$Assumed to estimate the total transition intensity of 266.5|g in 2020St11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E From level energy difference. 
TI$1.6~{I4}, estimated value in 2020St11 based on data in the literature, assuming transition multipolarity E3 for 18.2|g and conversion coefficient of 3.3 |* 10{+6} {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E From 2020St11 
RI$From 100/(1+0.249) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.095 {I17} (weighted average of 0.095 {I20} (1977Be23), 0.17 {I7} (1977Co21), and 0.07 {I4} (1981Kr20)). Also K/L=1.5 {I9} (1977Co21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 78.5 (1991Va04) 
M$From |a{-tot}=0.3 {I2}, deduced by authors of 2003An26, assuming cascade character of 105|g and 79|g. |a{-theo}=0.17 {I1} (E1), 3.1 {I1} (M1), and 16 {I1} (E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.042~{I8} (1991Va04 - deduced from balance of I|g, I(K| x ray) and I(L| x ray) coincident with feeding |a group; corrected for fluorescence. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Other: 89~{I1} (2003An26) 
M$From |a(K)exp=10.3 {I9} (2003An26). Other: |a(K)exp=17~{I8} (1991Va04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.07~{I4} (1981Kr20). Deduced from comparison of Hg daughter activity and I(K| x ray, Tl) decaying with the same half-life. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$estimated based on total intensity of 1.6 % {I4} for the 18-keV transition assuming pure M1 or pure E2 for the transitions depopulating the X+356 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 24 in ({+35}Cl,4n|g), 48 {I12} in table 5 of 1995La08 in ({+32}S,4n|g). 
M From ({+35}Cl,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E measurement of 1981Mi12 (semi). Other measurement: E|g=300 (1977Sc03; uncertainty not reported). 
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.121 {I18} from Ice(K)/I|g (1977Sc03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$the peak observed by 1977Sc03 near energy threshold of electron detector in their |g-ce coin experiment is attributed by authors to ce(N) for an E|?30 transition. E|g from level energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI a major part of the observed intensity is due to feeding from the 9/2- isomer in {+187}Tl, which was also created by the {+142}Nd+{+48}Ti reaction that was utilized to produce the {+187}Pb source. 
M,MR From adopted gammas. 
Coincident with K| x ray, 448.7|g, 511.0|g (1981Mi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO ratio suggests stretched D transition (1994Re02). Note that this |g feeds the 335 level in adopted levels, gammas, however. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M,MR from A{-2}=-0.71 {I5}, DCO=0.90 {I6}, DCO(D gate)=1.04 {I7} (1995La08). Magnitude of |d similar to 0.42 {I8} deduced by 1995La08 using crossover to cascade intensity ratio for J=13/2 member of same band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.35 {I12} (1995La08) and comparing RUL for E2 and M2. 
I(662|g)/I(268|g)=2.1 {I7} (table 5 of 1995La08) (presumably from gated spectrum) cf. 5.5 {I12} here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M D from A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, DCO=1.07 {I4}, DCO(stretched D gate)= 1.21 {I7}; E1 favored by intensity balance on 394.1|g and 331.5|g in the 392.8|g gated spectrum (1995La08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.34 {I7}, DCO=1.43 {I12}, DCO(stretched D gate)=1.9 {I5} (1995La08) and comparing RUL for E2 and M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.29 {I8}, DCO=1.21 {I7}, DCO(stretched D gate)=1.41 {I10} (1995La08) and comparing RUL for E2 and M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, DCO=1.33 {I6}, DCO(stretched D gate)=1.58 {I7} (1995La08) and comparing RUL for E2 and M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$from |a|g coin in {+192}Bi |a decay (39.6 s) (1991Va04,1988Hu03) 
M$|a(L)exp=40 {I10} from {+192}Bi |a decay (39.6 s) (1991Va04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$386.7 {i1} from ({+24}Mg,4n|g) (1988Kr16) not used. Weighted average of all three values is 386.5 {I2} with reduced |h{+2}=6.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$25% uncertainty is assumed by the evaluators 
E,RI$428.0 {I2} with I|g=157 {I8} in ({+24}Mg,4n|g) not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$ |g not seen in |e decay. In in-beam |g-ray data this |g is doubly placed with only a small component from 1646 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$ |DJ=1, dipole from |g(|q), |DJ|p 
RI$unweighted average from ({+24}Mg,4n|g) and ({+28}Si,4n|g), assuming 50% uncertainty in the value from the latter reaction 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$For B(M1)(W.u.) value, it is assumed that the 502.1|g is the dominant transition from 2148 level 
M$suggested as stretched dipole in 1995Re18, but stretched E2 in 1991Po15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$ |DJ=1, dipole (1995Re18) based on DCO ratios of 303 and 199 |g cascade in parallel to the 502|g 
E$ 502 (1988GoZN), but ordering in the cascade is different 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$ |DJ=2, Q transition based on DCO measurements as communicated to the evaluators by W. Reviol in a priv. comm. on Jan 30, 2011 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$ A 657|g placed from a different level in 1996RiZZ which requires it to be E2 from |DJ|p, but negative value of POL suggests M1. This |g may be a doublet. 
$Pol=-0.18 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E2 proposed in 1991Po15 but |DJ=1, dipole in 1995Re18 based on DCO ratios for the 303 and 199 cascade of transitions in parallel to the 502|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$probably corresponds to 754.7+761.7 doublet in 1991Po15, first from a 2163 level and the second from a 2308 level in Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$1991Va04 suggest that the placement of 161.9|g from a 0.75 ms isomer proposed by 1981Kr20 is incorrect. See comment for 245+x level 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp determined from K| x ray (1981Kr20), considered as uncertain by evaluators 
$If 245 level is an isomer of 0.75 ms half-life as suggested in 1981Kr20, B(E1)(W.u.)=1.43|*10{+-11} {I19}, B(M2)(W.u.)=6.3|*10{+-4} {I13}, giving unrealistically low B(E1)(W.u.) value by two orders of magnitude. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$on the basis of multipolarity and level lifetime, 1991Va04 suggest that this |g is different from 151.19|g reported in {+190}Pb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp (measured from K| x rays and I|g), considered as tentative by evaluators as not confirmed in other studies 
$1991Va04 (in {+194}Bi |a decay study) suggest that the placement of this |g from 250.9, (8-) level is incorrect for the following reasons: no (10-) to (8-) |a transition observed, no coincidences observed between 5598|a and 5660|a with a possible (9-) to (8-) M1 |g transition, and E1 hindrance factor of 161.9|g is high by three to four orders of magnitude, as compared to those for neighboring Tl nuclides 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference. Consistent with E|g=200 {I50} based on systematics of E|g for low-lying 3+ level to 2- g.s. transition in lower-mass Tl isotopes (1991Va04). |g has not been observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M D from |g(|q) in (O,xn|g); hindrance favors E1 (B(E1)(W.u.)=4|*10{+-8} cf. B(M1)(W.u.)=3|*10{+-6}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference. 1991Va04 predict E|g=200 {I50} based on systematics of E|g for the low-lying 3+ level to 2- g.s. transition in lower-mass Tl isotopes (1991Va04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (using target thick enough to stop all recoils) (1980Kr02). 
M D from |g(|q); E1 hindrance (B(E1)(W.u.)=4|*10{+-8} cf. B(M1)(W.u.)=3|*10{+-6}) consistent with systematics. Additionally, I(|g+ce)(422.8|g, {+192}Hg daughter)/I|g(251)=2.6 {I4} is incompatible with M2 or higher. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of measurements in {+193}Tl IT decay (365.0 keV, 1976Ha25) and (HI,xn|g) (365.3 keV, 1974Ne16). 
M,MR$from {+193}Tl IT decay (2.11 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)(139|g+148|g)=2.6 {i8} and |a(exp)(148|g+160|g)=3.0 {i8} (1996Bo02); theory: |a(K)(M1)=2.29 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)(167|g+181|g)=2.2 {i5} and |a(exp)(181|g+186|g)=1.8 {i7} (1996Bo02); theory: |a(K)(M1)=1.31 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)(181|g+186|g)=1.8 {i7} and |a(exp)(186|g+201|g)=1.4 {i6} (1996Bo02); theory: |a(K)(M1)=1.21 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1976Ha25. 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M,MR from K/L=3.8 {i4} (1963Di10); other: L/M=2.7 (1963Di10); theory: K/L=3.8 {i9}, L/M=4.1 {i5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI |g follows an isomeric transition with T{-1/2}=2.11 min and %IT|<75%. The equilibrium status of the source is not known. Therefore, I|g of this |g cannot be compared with I|g of the other |g's in the decay scheme. 1976Ha25 give I|g=100 
M,MR$from {+193}Tl IT decay (2.11 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.110 {i25} (1974Ne16); DCO=0.791 {i11} (1992Re08); A{-2}=-0.74 {i2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {i2} (1974Ne16); R{-ad}=0.91 {I8}, a{-pol}=-0.019 {I29} (2016NdZZ). 
MR from |g|g(|q) and |g(ce)(|q) (1996SaZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.21 {i5} (1974Ne16); R{-ad}=0.86 {I9} (2016NdZZ); DCO=0.791 {i11} (1992Re08); A{-2}=-0.74 {i2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {i2} (1974Ne16) for unresolved 323.8|g+320.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=1.29 {I23}, a{-pol}=0.06 {I3} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.0075 {i2} (1974Ne16); DCO=1.291 {i16} (1992Re08); A{-2}=+0.32 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {i5} (1974Ne16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=0.72 {I13}, a{-pol}=0.001 {I34} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.0060 {i15} (1974Ne16), theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00354, |a(K)(M1)=0.0299; DCO=0.704 {i23} (1992Re08); A{-2}=-0.19 {i4}, A{-4}=0.04 {i4} (1974Ne16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=0.79 {I8}, a{-pol}=-0.04 {I3} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.12 {i3}, K/L=4.3 {i8} (1974Ne16); DCO=0.81 {i3} (1992Re08); A{-2}=-0.51 {i8}, A{-4}=-0.16 {i8} (1974Ne16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=1.25 {I12} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.011 {i4} (1974Ne16); DCO=1.219 {i18} (1992Re08). theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00867 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=0.83 {I14}, a{-pol}=-0.07 {I3} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.12 {i3}, K/L=4.6 {i8} (1974Ne16); DCO=0.710 {i16} (1992Re08); A{-2}=-0.68 {i3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {i3} (1974Ne16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E,RI$416.9 is a doublet of 416.9|g and 417.4|g from 6271.2+x keV level. Undivided |g-ray intensity listed. 
M DCO=0.53 {i4} (1992Re08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Unobserved transition that lies at the shoulder of the x-ray peak tentatively placed based on observed coincidence relations. Placement from level scheme (Fig 4.1). In Table 4.1 - from 2226 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=0.73 {I16}, a{-pol}=-0.05 {I3} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.090 {i25} (1974Ne16); DCO=0.729 {i14} (1992Re08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Confirmed coincidence relation with 735.9|g from 1128.4 keV level, however, changed placement based on coincidences with both 406.6|g and 466.9|g from 1535- and 1595-keV level, respectively. In 1992Re08, 96.4 keV {i3}, from 2056.4+x, level not present in 2016NdZZ. 
M$R{-ad}=0.8 {I3} (2016NdZZ); DCO=1.24 {i5} (1992Re08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=1.29 {I25} (2016NdZZ); |a(K)exp=0.030 {i15} (1974Ne16); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00349, |a(K)(M1)=0.0292; DCO=1.191 {i19} (1992Re08); A{-2}=+0.24 {i17}, A{-4}=-0.05 {i17} (1974Ne16). In band transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$Placement from level scheme (Fig. 4.1). In Table 4.1 - from 1643 keV level - a misprint. Based on intensity balance at 2226.1 keV level, 2016NdZZ propose as an M1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=1.16 {I20} (2016NdZZ) 
E$Placement from level scheme (Fig. 4.1). In Table 4.1 - from 1128 keV level - is a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=0.78 {I9}, a{-pol}=-0.04 {I3} (2016NdZZ); DCO=0.884 {i24} (1992Re08); A{-2}=-0.49 {i15}, A{-4}=-0.02 {i15} (1974Ne16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From level scheme (Fig 4.1). In Table 4.1 - from 3191 keV level, which appears to be the same with this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$R{-ad}=0.74 {I21} (2016NdZZ)Expected to be a magnetic dipole transition (2016NdZZ) from 159.0|g and 929.0|g intensity comparisons of this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$Doublet of 601.0|g and 599.3|g from 4759 keV level. Undivided |g-ray intensity listed. 
M DCO=1.40 {i3} (1992Re08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Placement from level scheme (Fig. 4.1). In Table 4.1 - from 4749 keV level. 
M$R{-ad}=0.68 {I19} (2016NdZZ); DCO=0.60 {i3} (1992Re08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Placement from level scheme (Fig. 4.1). In table 4.1 - placement from 2661 keV level. 
M$R{-ad}=0.76 {I9} (2016NdZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$Doublet of 599.3|g and 601.0|g from 3642 keV level. Undivided |g-ray intensity listed. 
M$DCO=1.29 {i4} (1992Re08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E,RI$Doublet of 417.4|g and 416.9|g from 1929.7+x keV level. Undivided |g-ray intensity listed. Q 
M DCO=0.53 {i4} (1992Re08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 292.8 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 293.1 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 278.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 278.4 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I6} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 374.2 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 373.8 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 7.2 {I6} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 2.79 {I10} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 244.8 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 244.9 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I4} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 522.8 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 523.1 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 52.3 {I29} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 79.7 {I12} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 403.3 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 403.5 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I7} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 648.4 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 648.3 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 35.3 {I19} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 42.8 {I6} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 283.3 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 283.2 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 54.8 {I24} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 73.4 {I11} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 686.7 {I2} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I10} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 468.4 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I14} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 751.5 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 751.8 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 64 {I13} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 92.0 {I15} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 291.2 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 291.9 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 30 {I9} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 28.2 {I7} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 759.6 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 759.5 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 2939 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 162.4 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 162.5 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 478.5 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 478.3 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 179 {I30} from ({+18}O,5n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 769.6 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 769.1 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I21} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 247.5 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 248.6 {I3} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 35 {I4} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 41.4 {I9} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 726.0 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 725.8 {I3} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,4n|g). Other: 100 {I27} from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 3146 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 206.7 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 207.1 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 3958 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 215.6 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 215.5 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 137.3 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 136.9 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g). This |g is placed from the 694 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) by 2012Pa16 and re-placed from the 3778 level by 2014Ma55 in ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 3850 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 376.6 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 376.9 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 3743 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 322.3 {I3} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 322.2 {I1} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 3474 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 327.5 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 327.7 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 430.0 {I3} in ({+18}O,5n|g) and 428.6 {I2} in ({+13}C,4n|g). Note that this |g was placed from a 4279 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$This |g was placed from a 4340 level in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
E$weighted average of 381.2 {I5} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 381.3 {I2} from ({+13}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 95.8 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 96.3 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$unweighted average of 18.6 {I21} from 2014Ma55 and 10 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.87 {I10} (2014Ma55). 
$|g contaminated by {+194}Hg (1979Kr09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 278.2 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 277.9 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$from 1979Kr09. Other: 100 {I14} from 2014Ma55. 
$R{-ADO}=0.89 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 7.2 {I6} from 2014Ma55 and 8 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from R{-ADO}=1.30 {I21}, M2 less likely for a low-energy transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 244.9 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 244.7 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 59.7 {I14} from 2014Ma55 and 49 {I6} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.89 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 523.0 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 522.7 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 31.5 {I14} from 2014Ma55 and 26 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=1.35 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 403.5 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 403.2 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 44.1 {I29} from 2014Ma55 and 42 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.76 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 648.3 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 648.5 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 15.0 {I8} from 2014Ma55 and 18 {I3} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=1.22 {I27}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Kr09. Other: 283.3 {I5} from 2014Ma55. 
RI$weighted average of 22.8 {I10} from 2014Ma55 and 25 {I3} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.89 {I11}. POL for 282.9+283.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 686.8 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 686.7 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 41.3 {I42} from 2014Ma55 and 42 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=1.26 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|g unplaced in 1979Kr09. 
E$weighted average of 154.6 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 154.7 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 30 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 32 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.86 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 175.6 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 175.3 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$unweighted average of 34.8 {I32} from 2014Ma55 and 51 {I6} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.84 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|g unplaced in 1979Kr09. 
E$weighted average of 227.0 {I5} from 2014Ma55 and 227.3 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 6.4 {I8} from 2014Ma55 and 4.2 {I14} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.77 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|g placed from a 2346.2+y level in 1979Kr09. 
E$weighted average of 289.5 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 289.4 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 43.7 {I24} from 2014Ma55 and 39 {I4} from 1979Kr09. 
$R{-ADO}=0.77 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|g unplaced in 1979Kr09. 
E$weighted average of 279.4 {I3} from 2014Ma55 and 279.2 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$weighted average of 23.6 {I29} from 2014Ma55 and 24 {I3} from 1979Kr09. 
$D from R{-ADO}=0.88 {I12}; E1 ruled out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$|g placed from a 2056.8+y level in 1979Kr09. In spectral Fig. 2, 1979Kr09 label this |g ray also from {+195}Tl 
E$weighted average of 459.6 {I5} from 2014Ma55 and 458.6 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$from 2014Ma55. Other: 39 {I4} from 1979Kr09 is discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|g placed from a 2056.8+y level in 1979Kr09. 2014Ma55 report weak |g rays of 740.5 and 742.6 keV, both placed differently. 458.6 and 741.9 |g rays were placed from the same level in 1979Kr09 
E$weighted average of 742.6 {I5} from 2014Ma55 and 741.9 {I2} from 1979Kr09. 
RI$from 2014Ma55. Other: 18 {I3} from 1979Kr09 is discrepant. 
$|DJ=2, Q from |g(|q); M2 ruled out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|DJ=2, Q from R{-ADO}=1.36 {I38}; M2 ruled out by RUL. 
E$placed from a 2056.8+y level in 1979Kr09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$This |g is placed from the 3378 level in Adopted Levels, Gammas, placed by 2014Ma55 in ({+18}O,5n|g) 
M$|DJ=2, Q from DCO data, no evidence from |g|g-coin that this level is long-lived. E2 given in 2012Pa16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$E2 in 2012Pa16 
E$in least-squares adjustment, uncertainty was increased to 0.3 keV to get |h{+2} below the critical value 
M$|DJ=2, Q from DCO, low-energy transition unlikely to be M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1977CoZM, {+195}Pb |e decay 
M from |a(exp) 
MR 1.8 {I+4-3} from K/L=3.8 {I3} (1963Di10). Other |d=2.1 from I(|g+ce)(99|g)=I(|g+ce)(384|g) and ce(K)(383|g)/ce(L)(99|g)=0.078 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$346|g is shown in E(level)=1648 in authors' decay scheme and |g|g table. But this transition does not fit between the 1648 and 1267 levels. The transition probably deexcites the 1612.7 level instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$authors report E|g=196.6 in their E|g, I|g table; but 196.1 in their decay scheme, in |g|g spectrum, and in their |g|g table. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Required for intensity balance at 483 level and from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Others: 243 {I4} (1974Ne16), 271 {I22} (1977LiZG), 285 {I13} (1982Hi04); 311 {I20} (1977CoZM) includes {+195}Pb g.s. decay. 
MR from K/L=3.8 {I3} (1963Di10) {+195}Tl IT decay. Other: |d=2.4 from |a(K)exp=0.076 
CC |a(K)exp=0.048 {I4} (1977CoZM), 0.076 (1974Ne16), 0.087 (1972Ho09, normalized to |a(L)(99|g,E3)=116) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M based on L3/L2=0.66 {I5} (1957An54), 0.57 (1957An53), no K-line 
RI$Required for intensity balance at 483 level and from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Other: 1.77 {I15} from 1977CoZM. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI from 1977LiZG. Other I|g=8.5 {I6} (1977CoZM) probably includes I|g(847.1|g), 8.0 {I13} (1982Hi04) includes I|g(848.3|g) 
CC |a(K)exp(848.7|g)=0.0082 {I19} deduced from doublet |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I16} if 847|g is E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI from 1977LiZG. Other: I|g=2.3 {I9} (1982Hi04). 
M based on |g(|q) A{-2}=+0.32 {I3} (1977LiZG), reaction |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI doublet=9.1 {I11} (for 672.3|g + 673.2|g) 
M doublet |g(|q): A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} for 672.3|g + 673.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M K:L2:L3:M:N=13 {I2}:9 {I2}:6 {I2}:8 {I2}:1.5 {I7} (1961Sv01). K/L=0.8 {I2}, L2/L3=1.7 {I6}, L/M=2.1 {I8}, M/N=5 {I2} (1961Sv01). E2 theory: K/L=0.87, L2/L3=1.6 
ce(K)(191.8)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.13 {I2} (1961Sv01). 
M M1 from 1982Hi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR based upon ce ratios: K(240)/K(253)=0.34 {I4}, ce(L)|<12 (1961Sv01); K(240)/L3(120)|<0.23 (1960Ju01). M1 theory: |a(K)/|a(L)=5.8, |a(K)/|a(L3)=850; E2 theory: |a(K)/|a(L)=1.3, |a(K)/|a(L3)=4.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M the strongest ce line in {+196}Pb |e decay. M1 theory: K/L=5.90, L/M=4.3, |a(K)=0.5321; E1 theory: K/L=5.87, L/M=4.3, |a(K)=0.03523. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E from {+196}Tl IT decay. 
M supported by Ice(K)(274.6)/Ice(L3)(120.1)=0.50 {I10}; K/L|>6(1960Ju01); M1 theory: K/L=5.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
CC M4 |a(theory)'s mult. By 0.975 {I5} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M supported by K:L:M:N=0.14 {I7}:1.00:0.33 {I3}:0.13 {I3} and L1:L2:L3=0.36 {I7}:0.14 {I5}:1.00 (1960Ju01); M4 theory: K:L:M=0.11:1.0:0.33, L1:L2:L3=0.37:0.078:1.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M Ice(K)(240.7)/Ice(L3)(120.1)|<0.23 (1960Ju01); in {+196}Pb |e decay, K/L|>2.8, K/L3>60 (1961Sv01); M1 theory: K/L=5.8, K/L3=850; E2 theory: K/L=1.3, K/L3=4.4 
TI From intensity balance at 240.8keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M Ice(L1)(33.7)/Ice(L3)(120.1)=0.25 {I10} (1960Ju01). 
TI From Ice(L1)=25 {I10} and |a{-L1}(M1)/|a(M1)=0.69 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M K/L|>6; M1 theory: K/L=5.9 Ice(K)(274.6)/Ice(L3)(120.1)=0.50 {I10} (1960Ju01) 
TI From measured conversion-electron data(1960Ju01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULTIPLIED BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M supported by K:L:M:N=0.14 {I7}:1.00:0.33 {I3}:0.13 {I3} and L1:L2:L3=0.36 {I7}:0.14 {I5}:1.00 (1960Ju01); M4 theory: K:L:M=0.11:1.0:0.33, L1:L2:L3=0.37:0.078:1.0 
TI From measured conversion-electron data(1960Ju01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M K:L2:L3:M:N=13 {I2}:9 {I2}:6 {I2}:8 {I2}:1.5 {I7} (1961Sv01). K/L=0.8 {I2}, L2/L3=1.7 {I6}, L/M=2.1 {I8}, M/N=5 {I2} (1961Sv01). E2 theory: K/L=0.87, L2/L3=1.6 
ce(K)(191.8)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.13 {I2} (1961Sv01). 
TI I(|g+ce)=34 {I5} (1961Sv01). 
M M1 from 1982Hi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
ce(K)(113)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.10 {I3} (1961Sv01). 
E from 1961Sv01 only. 
E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
ce(K)(126)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.06 {I2} (1961Sv01). 
E from 1961Sv01 only. 
RI From I(|g+ce)/(1+|a) and I(|g+ce) required for intensity balance at 240 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
ce(K)(175)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.08 {I3} (1961Sv01). 
E from 1961Sv01 only. 
E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M K/L>5, ce(K)=18 {I6} (1961Sv01). 
ce(K)(366.6)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.18 {I6} (1961Sv01). 
TI I(|g+ce)=38 {I12} (1961Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
ce(K)(127)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.06 {I2} (1961Sv01). 
E from 1961Sv01 only. 
E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
ce(K)(241)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.04 {I1} (1961Sv01). 
E from 1961Sv01 only. 
E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from ({+3}He,3n|g). Others: 385.6 {I2} (|a,4n|g), 385.85 {I10} ({+197}Pb |e decay) 
I(ce(K) 386|g)/I(ce(L) 222|g)=0.136 (1957An53,1957An54), 0.146 (1963Di10) 
|a(K)exp=0.09 {I3} (1965Sc18), 0.103 {I10} (1966Sc28), 0.068 {I11} (1979CoZI) 
K/L=3.5 (1957An53), 3.4 {I4} (1963Di10) 
MR derived from I(|g+ce)(386|g,M1+E2)=I(|g+ce)(222|g,E3) required for level intensity balance; sign from |g|g(|q) (1966Sc28). Others: 1.0 {I1} (|a(K)exp=0.103 {I10}), 1.8 {I4} (|a(K)exp=0.068 {I11}), +0.82 {I14} (A{-2}=0.19 {I3}), 2.4 {I8} (K/L=3.4 {I4}). Analog: |d(384|g,{+195}Tl)=1.8 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from 1957An54, ce. Others: 222.8 {I1} (1977Ve02), 222.5 {I2} (1978Li10) 
RI I|g/I|g(3850)=0.33 from I(ce) data 
|a(K)exp=0.41 {I5} (1965Sc18) K| x ray/I|g, scin; 0.38 {I6} (1979CoZI) semi 
L1:L2:L3=26 {I3}:217 {I12}:100 (1957An54); L1+L2/L3=2.5 (1957An53), 2.4 {I4} (1979CoZI) 
K/L=0.242 {I18} (1957An54), 0.28 {I5} (1963Di10), 0.226 {I41} (1979CoZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI at equilibrium I|g=350 {I27} minus I|g=294 via 43 min {+197}Pb |e decay 
|d=+1.7 {I3} (0.54-s IT decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC=0.00987, LC=0.00160, CC=0.01200 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00389, LC=0.00071, CC=0.00483 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0084 {I30} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC=0.01883, LC=0.00308, CC=0.02293 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00628, LC=0.00126, CC=0.00796 IF MULT=E2 
RI via |g|g-coin; I|g(8 min)/I|g(43 min)=1.8 {I6} 
Doublet |a(K)exp=0.009 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC=0.01941, LC=0.00318, CC=0.02364 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00642, LC=0.00130, CC=0.00815 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.016 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC=0.00791, LC=0.00128, CC=0.00962 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00332, LC=0.00059, CC=0.00410 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0053 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC=0.00749, LC=0.00121, CC=0.00910 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00319, LC=0.00056, CC=0.00393 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0046 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 385.6 {I4} (1972Ho09), 385.7 (1974Ne16), 385.8 {I3} (1977Ve02), 385.6 {I2} (1978Li10), 385.7 {I2} (1980Hi04) 
RI 350 {I27} measurement includes {+197}Pb isomer+g.s. decays at equilibrium. I|g=293 calculated from I(|g+ce)(222|g,E3)=I(|g+ce)(385.8|g) required for level intensity balance 
|a(K)exp=0.068 {I11} (1979CoZI), 0.076 ce(K)(1957An53)/I|g(1974Ne16), 0.077 (1972Ho09) 
MR from I(|g+ce)(386|g)=I(|g+ce)(222|g) and |g|g(|q) via 0.54-s {+197}Tl decay; other: 1.8 {I4} from |a(K)exp=0.068 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E others: 222.45 {I5} (1957An54), 222.4 {I3} (1972Ho09), 222.8 {I1} (1977Ve02), 222.5 {I2} (1978Li10), 222.4 {I2} (1980Hi04) 
|a(K)exp=0.38 {I6} 
K/L1+L2/L3=7.7 {I15}/24 {I4}/10 (1979CoZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 387.7 (1974Ne16), 388.0 {I3} (1977Ve02), 387.6 {I2} (1978Li10), 387.7 {I2} (1980Hi04) 
|a(K)exp=0.16 {I3} (1979CoZI), 0.17 ce(K)(1957An53)/I|g(1974Ne16) 
MR from 388|g(|q) A{-2}=-0.59 {I2} (|a,4n|g). Other |d|?0.25 from |a(K)exp=0.16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from (|a,4n|g). Others: 308.0 {I4} (1972Ho09), 307.7 (1974Ne16), 308.1 {I2} (1980Hi04) 
RI {+197}Hg fraction subtracted 
MR from 308|g(|q) A{-2}=-0.32 {I2} (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E others: 695.0 {I10} (1972Ho09), 695.4 {I2} (1978Li10) 
M from 695|g(|q) A{-2}=0.27 {I2} (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 558.0 {I9} (1972Ho09), 558.3 {I1} (1977Ve02), 557.6 {I2} (1978Li10) 
|a(K)exp=0.049 {I10} 
MR from 558|g(|q) A{-2}=-0.71 {I2} (|a,4n|g). Other |d=0.7 {I4} from |a(K)exp=0.049 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC= 0.0430, LC=0.00711, CC=0.0524 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.01176, LC=0.00287, CC=0.01557 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.026 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC=0.00672, LC=0.00109, CC=0.00816 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00295, LC=0.00051, CC=0.00363 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I27} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 0.0492, LC=0.00816, CC=0.0601 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.01307, LC=0.00331, CC=0.01748 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.044 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC=0.01760, LC=0.00288, CC=0.02143 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00597, LC=0.00119, CC=0.00755 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0093 {I37} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC=0.01646, LC=0.00269, CC=0.02003 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00567, LC=0.00111, CC=0.00716 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0091 {I35} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g-coin; I|g=3.4 {I3} via {+197}Pb isomer+g.s. decay at equilibrium 
Doublet |a(K)exp=0.0040 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC=0.01325, LC=0.00216, CC=0.01612 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00483, LC=0.00092, CC=0.00605 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.009 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC=0.01189, LC=0.00193, CC=0.01446 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00446, LC=0.00083, CC=0.00557 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 1.586, LC= 0.271, MC= 0.0633, NC+=0.02051, CC=1.940 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.2455, LC= 0.356, MC= 0.0925, NC+= 0.0298, CC=0.723 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.33 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 0.475, LC= 0.0805, MC=0.01879, NC+=0.00601, CC=0.581 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.0879, LC= 0.0586, MC=0.01502, NC+=0.00483, CC=0.1663 IF MULT=E2 
Doublet |g(|q): A{-2}=-0.36 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
KC= 0.935, LC= 0.1589, MC= 0.0372, NC+=0.01196, CC=1.143 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.1585, LC= 0.1588, MC= 0.0410, NC+=0.01318, CC=0.372 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 6.80, LC= 1.168, MC= 0.273, NC+= 0.0893, CC=8.33 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.575, LC= 3.59, MC= 0.939, NC+= 0.304, CC=5.41 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.24 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 5.99, LC= 1.029, MC= 0.2402, NC+= 0.0787, CC=7.34 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.558, LC= 2.92, MC= 0.766, NC+= 0.2484, CC=4.50 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.29 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 0.1338, LC=0.02247, MC=0.00523, NC+=0.00168, CC=0.1631 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.0295, LC=0.01063, MC=0.00265, NC+=0.00085, CC=0.0436 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 1.134, LC= 0.1934, MC= 0.0452, NC+=0.01459, CC=1.387 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.1871, LC= 0.2131, MC= 0.0552, NC+=0.01775, CC=0.473 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.36 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
KC= 0.959, LC= 0.1631, MC= 0.0381, NC+=0.01228, CC=1.172 IF MULT=M1; 
KC= 0.1621, LC= 0.1650, MC= 0.0427, NC+=0.01371, CC=0.384 IF MULT=E2 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.33 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
ECC$measured by 2018Hi07, from the measured (ce)|g-coin and |g singles spectra with T{-on}/T{-off}=6/3 s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$2019Na08 flag DCO is from 609-keV E2 gate, which is likely in error, since |DJ=1 is from the level scheme while DCO is consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 if the gate is E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E From 1960Ju01 
RI From |a and I(|g+ce) 
TI From intensity balance at 259.7 level 
M From M1:M2:M3=6:|?1:weak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=12 {I3}, |a(L)exp=14 {I3} (1960Ju01); |a(exp)=40.1 {I86} (1986Ve03). 
M From L1,2/L3=1.38 {I7}, |a(K)exp=12 {I3}, |a(L)exp=14 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
|a(L1)exp=0.55, L1/L2=7.6 (1977Kr04) 
M From |a(L)exp 
E$Other: 130.5 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ POL=+0.042 {I8} (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.012 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E1(+M2) with |d=-0.035 {I+12-8} from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 390.6 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.45 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.16 (1977Kr04) 
M$|a(L)exp suggests M1 
MR$From 1977Kr04 
E$Other: 279.0 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I4} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.36 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E2+M1 with |d=1.11 {I+17-15} from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 291.9 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=-1.60 {I+22-13} or 2.47 {I+28-23} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.45 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.45 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E2+M1 from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 290.5 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.36 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.16 (1977Kr04) 
M From |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in 1977Kr04. 
MR$From 1977Kr04 
E$Other: 326.1 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=-0.62 {I+13-75} or 1.11 {I+49-44} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.73 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest D+Q from |g(|q) 
E$Other: 456.8 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.41 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
|d=-0.53 or -1.54 {I+110-11}; L1/L2=7.2 rules out |d=-0.53 (1977Kr04). 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E2+M1 from |g(|q) 
E$Other: 122.2 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=-0.14 {I7} or 0.21 {I+8-11} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.45 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.80 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E2+M1 from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 188.6 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|d=-1.03 {I+50-45} or 1.60 {I+45-107} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.71 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I5} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.31 (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 312.6 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=-1.11 {I+53-27} or 1.48 {I+25-86} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.57 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I5} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.18 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E2+M1 from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 324.1 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.08 {I3} for unresolved doublet (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.4 {I2}, A{-4}=0 (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 603.0 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.024 {I12} (2010La15) 
|g(|q):=A{-2}=-0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.58 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest M1+E2 with |d=-0.16 {I+3-1} from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 259.0 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|d=-4.01 {I+52-69} or 9 {I+5-4} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.36 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 326.9 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.027 {I12} (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.49 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest M1+E2 with |d=-0.16 {I2} from |g(|q) 
E$Other: 246.0 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.06 {I4} (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2} (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 505.3 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|d=2.7 {I+13-7} or -2.25 {I+52-50} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.37 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I6} (1977Kr04) 
M,MR From 1977Kr04 
E$Other: 778.1 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=-0.21 {I+3-4} or 0.29 {I+3-4} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.58 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.44 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest E2+M1 from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 275.6 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.08 {I3} for unresolved doublet (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.18 {I20}, A{-4}=0 (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 602.4 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.024 {I10} (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.56 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.21 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest M1+E2 with |d=-0.19 {I2} from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 401.5 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.05 {I24} for unresolved doublet (2010La15) 
|d=-2.47 {I+22-27} or 3.49 {I+52-41} (1977Kr04) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.64 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=1.0 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest M1+E2 from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 196.4 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.06 {I4} (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I8} (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 472.1 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.05 {I3} (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.56 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1977Kr04) 
|a(K)exp=0.52 (1977Kr04) 
M 1977Kr04 suggest M1+E2 with |d=-0.21 {I7} from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
E$Other: 296.7 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.08 {I5} for unresolved doublet (2010La15) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.4 {I1}, A{-4}=0 (1977Kr04) 
E$Other: 698.2 {I2} (1977Kr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$from {+199}Tl IT decay 
TI$from {+199}Tl IT decay: I(|g+ce)(29|g)=I(|g+ce)(720|g)+I(|g+ce)(353| g) 
CC$given for E|g=29.3 {I3} (E|g calculated from E(level) difference) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI,M$from {+199}Tl IT decay 
E$from {+199}Tl |e decay (12.2 min) 
B(E3)(W.u.): compare to B(E3)(W.u.)=0.0086 {I9} for the analogous transition in {+201}Tl (1994Ra12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from K/L=3.5 {I3} (1963Di10) and (L1+L2)/L3=7.4 ({+199}Pb |e decay); sign is positive from |g|g(|q) (1963Di10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
CC for E|g=29.3 {I3} from E(level) difference (adopted E(level)) 
I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(353|g)+I(|g+ce)(720|g)=10 from decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q),A{-2}=0.20 {I+4-3} for 9/2(E3)3/2(M1+E2)1/2; also K/L=0.88 {I5} (1963Di10); also |a(K)exp=0.10 from (|a,2n|g) reaction; theory: |a(K)(E3)=0.097 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of |d deduced from (L1+L2)/L3=7.4, K/L=4.4 (10% uncertainty assumed by evaluator) (1957An53) and K/L=3.5 {I3} (IT decay). Sign is positive from |g(|q) (1963Di10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 'adopted gammas'. 
$|a(K)exp=0.075 {I20}, A{-2}=-0.333 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.017 {I12} for 366.7+369.3 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.15 {I2} and L12/L1=40 (in {+199}Pb |e decay); K/L=3.4 {I10} (1970Ne06) is in disagreement with K/L=5.3 in {+199}Pb |e decay. 
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I4}, K/L(90|')=6.8 {I15}, (K/L value not completely resolved in 367-keV transition) 
MR$A{-2}=-0.333 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.017 {I12} for 366.7+369.3 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|d(O/Q)=0.2 {I+4-3} (1986Li26) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3} (1986Li26) 
$ A2=+0.21 8, A4=-0.05 10 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp(90|')=0.023 {I4}, K/L(90|')=6.6 {I14} 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.67 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I3} (1986Li26) 
$ A2=-0.60 8, A4=+0.02 8 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I3}, K/L(90|')=6.8 {I10} 
MR$A{-2}=-0.57 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (1986Li26). Other: -0.30 {I+1-2} (1970Ne06) 
$ A2=-0.57 2, A4=-0.01 4 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0080 {I15} 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1986Li26) 
$ A2=+0.26 4, A4=-0.04 4 (1970Ne06) 
$|d(Q/O)=0.00 {I12} (1986Li26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I3}, K/L(90|')=3.5 {I10} 
MR$A{-2}=-0.52 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I3} (1986Li26). Other: -3 {I+1-3} (1970Ne06) 
$ A2=-0.48 8, A4=-0.04 8 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I2}, K/L(90|')=4.0 {I13} (1970Ne06) 
MR$A{-2}=-0.66 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1986Li26). Other: -0.29 {I14} (1970Ne06) 
$ A2=-0.54 10, A4=-0.1 1 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I4} 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1986Li26) 
$ A2=+0.35 16, A4=-0.25 16 (1970Ne06) 
$|d(O/Q)=+0.03 {I+21-19} (1986Li26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(90|')=0.010 {I4} or 0.008 {I3} gives mult=E1(+M2), |d=0.09 {I+5-9} (1970Ne06). 
$A{-2}=+0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I3} (1986Li26) 
$ A2=+0.34 10, A4=-0.1 1 (1970Ne06) 
$|d((L+1)/L)=+0.09 {I+5-9}; -0.12 {I9} (1986Li26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0045 {I15} 
MR$A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (1986Li26). Other: 0.03 {I5} (1970Ne06) 
$ A2=-0.17 5, A4=+0.01 5 (1970Ne06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.30 {I3}, |a(L12)exp=0.41 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.27 {I4}, (|a(M2)exp+|a(M3)exp)=0.19 {I4}; L12/L3=1.58 {I7} (1957As64); K/L(exp)=0.44 {I4}, L12/L3(exp)=1.5 {I2} and L/M(exp)=3.6 {I6} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=5.7 {I10}, |a(L1)exp=1.09 {I24}, |a(L2)exp=0.109 {I24}, |a(M1)exp=0.23 {I9}; K/L1/L2/M1(exp)=22 {I2}/4.2 {I7}/0.42 {I7}/0.9 {I3} and K/L(exp)=4.7 {I8} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.26 {I2}, |a(L12)exp=0.079 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.014 {I6}, |a(N1)exp=0.0070 {I14}; K/L(exp)=3.1 {I5}, L12/L3(exp)=5.5 {I23} (1963Wi04) 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L(exp) using briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L2)exp=3.0 {I7}, |a(M1)exp=8.2 {I22}, |a(M2)exp=1.6 {I7}, |a(M3)exp=1.4 {I9}; L1/L2/M1/M2/M3(exp)= 6.3 {I10}/0.66 {I10}/1.8 {I4}/0.35 {I4}/0.3 {I2} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.74 {I22}, |a(L12)exp=0.56 {I7}, |a(M1)exp=0.135 {I25}, |a(N1)exp=0.044 {I12}; K/L(exp)=4.8 {I6} and K/L12/M1/N1(exp)=69 {I4}/14.2 {15}/3.4 {I6}/1.1 {I3} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.53 {I13}, |a(L12)exp=0.09 {I3}; K/L(exp)=5.8 {I13}, K/L12(exp)=0.70 {I10}/0.12 {I3} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.166 {I19}, |a(L12)exp=0.029 {I3}, |a(M)exp=0.0060 {I8}; K/L(exp)=5.8 {I9}, L/M(exp)=4.7 {I8}, K/L12/M(exp)=4.4 {I5}/0.76 {I8}/0.16 {I2} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.37 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.14 {I6} in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03); DCO(D+Q)=1.33 {I5} and POL=+0.13 {I7} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.62 {I9} and A{-4}=-0.13 {I9} in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03); A{-2}=-0.66 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I16} and POL=+0.02 {I3} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+197}Au({+207}Pb,x|g) 
M$From intensity balance considerations in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+197}Au({+207}Pb,x|g) 
M$A{-2}=0.35 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} consistent with J to J stretched dipole transition; pure E1 is suggested from unpublished ce studies reported in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.16 {I3} and A{-4}=0.03 {I5} in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03); DCO(D)=1.11 {I3} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I4} and A{-4}=0.08 {I7} in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03); DCO(Q)=0.46 {I1}, POL=-0.04 {I2} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.42 {I5} and A{-4} was set to zero in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03); A{-2}=-0.23 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8}, DCO(D)=0.72 {I1} and POL=-0.04 {I2} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.23 {I13} with A{-4} set to zero in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03); DCO(Q)=0.47 {I2}, POL=-0.05 {I2} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.53 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7}, DCO(Q)=1.02 {I9} and POL=+0.14 {I4} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I8}, DCO(Q)=0.30 {I2}, POL=-0.03 {I3} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.54 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I1}, DCO(Q)=0.85 {I6}, POL=+0.15 {I4} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$Other: DCO(Q)=0.58 {I1} in {+198}Pt({+7}Li,5n|g) (2017Bh02), consistent with D, where 191.5|g was assigned as (M1+E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 1963Wi04 
RI$From |a(L1)=28.6 {I4} from BRICC for Mult.=M1 and Ice(L1)=6.3 {I10} in 1963Wi04, and normalization factor of 3.77, determined from |a(K)(147.63|g)=0.333 (BRICC), Ice(K,147.63|g)=100 (1963Wi04) and I|g(147.63|g)=1133 (1970Do11) 
M$|a(L2)exp=3.0 {I7}, |a(M1)exp=8.2 {I22}, |a(M2)exp=1.6 {I7}, |a(M3)exp=1.4 {I9}; L1/L2/M1/M2/M3(exp)= 6.3 {I10}/0.66 {I10}/1.8 {I4}/0.35 {I4}/0.3 {I2} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.78 {I5}, |a(L12)exp=0.135 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.039 {I5}; K/L(exp)=5.8 {I5}, L/M(exp)=3.4 {I4}, K/L12/M1(exp)=26.7 {I13}/4.6 {I3}/1.35 {I15} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.58 {I5}, |a(L12)exp=0.098 {I13}, |a(M1)exp=0.021 {I6}; K/L(exp)=5.8 {I9}, K/L12/M1(exp)=18.4 {I15}/3.1 {I4}/0.65 {I20} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.38 {I8}, |a(L12)exp=0.11 {I3}; K/L(exp)=3.4 {I10}, K/L12(exp)=0.68 {I10}/0.20 {I5} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.054 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.0089 {I13}; K/L(exp)=6.0 {I12}, K/L12(exp)=0.24 {I4}/0.040 {I5} (1963Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.08 {I2} and A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}, but values are inconsistent with proposed E2 multipolarity presumably due to the lost of alignment following decays of long-lived isomers 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a=0.06 {I2} from intensity balance considerations in 1981Kr03. A{-2}=0.01 {I2} and A{-4}=0.02 {I3}, but values are inconsistent with the proposed E1 multipolarity presumably due to the loss of alignment following the decay of a long-lived isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From intensity balance considerations in 1981Kr03; A{-2}=-0.04 {I4} (with A{-4} set to zero), but this value is inconsistent with that expected for a pure E1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.35 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} consistent with J to J stretched dipole transition; pure E1 is suggested from unpublished ce studies reported in 1981Kr03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. Transition was not measured directly, but suggested by the authors in analogy with {+198}Tl 
RI$From I(|g+ce)(3.4|g)/I(|g+ce)(493.8|g)=13 {i4} in 1981Kr03, I|g(493.8|g) and |a(3.4|g and 493.8|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.1069 {I21}, |a(L3)exp=0.00365 {I12}, K/L=3.76 {I6} (1974Ha18); K/L=3.9 {I3}, L12/L3=7.1 {I9} (1964Aa01); |a(K)exp=0.113 {I8} (1961Pe05); K/L12=4.2 {I2}, L12/L3=6.5 {I5} (1960Li08); |g|g(|q) in 1961Pe05; |a(K)exp=0.113 {I8} (1979Do09), normalized value adopted by the authors from the data of 1961Pe05; |a(K)exp=0.111 {I16} (1971Hn04); A{-2}=0.012 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I18} (1977Sl01) 
MR$From 1974Ha18, by taking into account the penetration effect and using |l=+4.0 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.193 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.00029 {I7} (1974Ha18); K/L=5.9 {I6}, L12/L3=7.1 {I9} (1964Aa01); |a(K)exp=0.210 {I25} and |g|g(|q) (1961Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} (1979Do09); A{-2}=-0.099 {I26}, A{-4}=0.026 {I38} (1977Sl01) 
MR$From 1974Ha18, by taking into account the penetration effect and using |l=+0.5 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0074 {I16} (1979Do09); |a(K)exp=0.0079 {I16} (1971Hn04); A{-2}=0.136 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.050 {I44} (1977Sl01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.051 {I6} (1979Do09); |a(K)exp=0.049 {I10} (1971Hn04); |a(K)exp=0.06 {I1} and |g|g(|q) (1961Pe05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.383 {I29}, A{-4}=0.052 {I46} (1977Sl01); DCO=1.13 {I3}, POL=-0.026 {I19} (2013Da15) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g) (1977Sl01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: I|g=29 {I3} in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g) (1977Sl01) 
M$A{-2}=0.204 {I50}, A{-4}=-0.062 {I77} (1977Sl01); DCO=0.53 {I4}, POL=+0.117 {I24} (2013Da15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.67 {I15} (1979Do09), indicating E0 admixtures, but |a(K)exp=0.37 {I13} (1971Hn04), consistent with M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.407 {I26}, A{-4}=0.010 {I37} (1977Sl01); DCO=1.48 {I4}, POL=-0.016 {I28} (2013Da15) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: I|g=38 {I7} in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g) (1977Sl01) 
M$A{-2}=0.33 {I15} with A{-4} set to zero (1977Sl01); DCO=0.54 {I2}, POL=+0.062 {I32} (2013Da15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.01 {I3}, POL=+0.077 {I30} (2013Da15); interpreted as Mult.=(M1+E2) and |d |? 0.3 in 1977Sl01 (A{-2}=0.162 {I10}, A{-4}=0.002 {I15}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. Not observed directly, but required by the coincidence relationship (2013Da15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas; Other: 588.0 {I2} (975Uy01). E|g=582.3 keV {I3} was reported in 1967Co20, but it was not confirmed by others 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.1069 {I21}, |a(L3)exp=0.00365 {I12}, K/L=3.76 {I6} (1974Ha18) ce(K)=1000, K/L=3.9 {I3}, L12/L3=7.1 {I9} (1964Aa01); |a(K)exp=0.113 {I8} (1961Pe05); K/L12=4.2 {I2}, L12/L3=6.5 {I5} (1960Li08); |g|g(|q) in 1961Pe05; |a(K)exp=0.113 {I8} (1979Do09), normalized value adopted by the authors from the data of 1961Pe05; |a(K)exp=0.111 {I16} (1971Hn04) 
MR$From 1974Ha18, by taking into account the penetration effect and using |l=+4.0 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.193 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.00029 {I7} (1974Ha18); ce(K)=240 {I10}, K/L=5.9 {I6}, L12/L3=7.1 {I9} (1964Aa01); |a(K)exp=0.210 {I25} and |g|g(|q) (1961Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} (1979Do09) 
MR$From 1974Ha18, by taking into account the penetration effect and using |l=+0.5 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$ce(K)=21 {I2} (1964Aa01); |a(K)exp=0.051 {I6} (1979Do09); |a(K)exp=0.06 {I1} and |g|g(|q) (1961Pe05); |a(K)exp=0.049 {I10} (1971Hn04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$In table II of 1979Do09 E|g=1470.91 keV is listed, which is a typo as evident from the spectrum shown in Figure 2 in 1979Do09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$ce(K)=3.0 {I5} (1964Aa01); |a(K)exp=0.67 {I15} (1979Do09). Note that |a(K)exp is larger than that expected from theory and one may expect E0 admixtures; |a(K)exp=0.37 {I13} (1971Hn04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=191; T{-1/2}|>60 ns from 588.3 |g(t). 
M$From adopted gammas; A{-2}=0, A{-4}=0 used for normalization since the |g(|q) is isotropic due to the large T{-1/2} involved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=22; T{-1/2}=2.4 ns {I+38-8} from 319.0|g(t). 
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.451 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.045 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=0 
E$493.9|g is not found to be in |g|g coin with any transition in {+201}Tl 
M$A{-2}=-0.203 {I18}, A{-4}=0.055 {I26}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.383 {I29}, A{-4}=0.052 {I46}. Alternative solution of |d=-2.9 {I-7+9} is also possible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences (adopted gammas). Not observed directly, but required by the coincidence relationship (2013Da15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Doublet with 240.3|g in {+202}Pb IT decay; I|g(241.1|g) deduced from I|g(240|g+241|g)=2.2 {I3} (1972Gu06) and I|g(240.3|g)=0.51 {I4} from {+202}Pb IT decay 
M$K/L=1.3 {I2} and L12/L3=2.5 {I3} (1957Mc40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$Recommended in 2000He14. 
MR$From |a(t)exp=0.2261 {I9}, weighted average of 0.2271 {I12} (recommended in 1985HaZA, based on all published conversion electron data until 1985) and 0.2250 {I12} (2000Sc05). Other: +1.51 {I5} using the briccmixing program and the following data: |d=+1.50 {I8} (1958Mc02), +1.15 {I10} (1973Kr02), +1.10 {I8} (1979Ha06), 1.7 {I4} (1977Da06), |a{K}exp=-0.1640 {I10} and |a{T}=0.2271 {I12} (recommended in 1985HaZA, based on all published conversion electron data until 1985) and 0.2250 {I12} (2000Sc05); K/L=3.39 {I6} and 3.34 {I10} (1958Ni28), 3.36 {I5} (1974Ha18), L/M+N+O=3.28 {I10} and 3.40 {I15}(1958Ni28), K/L1=6.64 {I7}, K/L2=10.05 {I15}, K/L3=21.2 {I6} and K/M=13.74 {I24} (1964He19) 
CC$0.2261 {I9}, weighted average of 0.2271 {I12} (recommended in 1985HaZA, based on all published conversion electron data until 1985) and 0.2250 {I12} (2000Sc05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$Recommended in 2000He14 
RI$From {+203}Pb |e decay (1989Ne05). 
M,MR$Using the briccmixing program and the following data: |d=0.030 {I2} (1965Ka02), <0.05 (1958Mc02), -0.079 {I29} (1973Kr02), 0.04 {I14} (1977Da06), 0.025 {I6} (1961Ge03), 0.043 {I10} (1960De04), -0.04 {I5} (1979Ha06); K/L1=6.4 {I5}, K/L2=67 {I10}, K/L3=794 {I99} (1964He19). Sign of |d is from 1973Kr02 and 1979Ha06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Recommended in 2000He14 
RI$From {+203}Pb |e decay (1989Ne05).Others: 22.0 {I24} in {+203}Tl(n,n'|g) (1981He14) and 28 {I3} in Coulomb excitation (1973Kr02) 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} in {+203}Pb |e decay (1960De04); |g(|q) in {+203}Tl(n,n'|g) (1977Da06) and Coulomb excitation (1973Kr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) in {+203}Tl(n,n'|g) (1977Da06) and A{-2}=0.140 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I10} in {+204}Hg(d,3n|g) (1977Sl01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) in {+203}Tl(n,n'|g) (1977Da06) and A{-2}=0.165 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.011 {I16} in {+204}Hg(d,3n|g) (1977Sl01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Two hyperfine components measured: 277.95 keV {I5} and 280.26 keV {I9}; I(277.9|g)/I(280.2|g)=2.1 {I3} (1974Ba77); Other: 278.13 {I9} and 280.71 {I16}; I(278.1|g)/I(280.7|g)=1.8 {I4} (1972Ba53) 
RI$From 1974Ba77. Other: 4.1 {I10} in 1972Ba53. 
MR$Value corresponds to |d{-|m}, which differs from the normal |d by the presente of 1s{-1/2} muon. It was deduced from the intensity ratio of hyperfine components and E|g of 1974Ba77. Other: |d{-|m}=0.94 {I14} (1972Ba53). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$279.16 keV {I2} (1973Kr02) 
M$A{-2}=0.765 {I38} (1979Ha06); |g(|q) in 1973Kr02 and 1958Mc02. 
MR$Others (from Coulex): +1.10 {I8} (1979Ha06), +1.15 {I10} (1973Kr02) and +1.50 {I8} (1958Mc02) 
CC$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$401.27 keV {I5} (1973Kr02) 
M$A{-2}=-0.44 {I7} (1979Ha06); |g(|q) in 1973Kr02. 
MR$Others: -0.079 {I29} (1973Kr02), -0.035 {I45} (1979Ha06) and |<0.05 (1958Mc02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=23.5; T{-1/2}=7.6 ns {I-21+10} from 279.1 |g(t). 
M$A{-2}=0.142 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=13.9; T{-1/2}=6.5 ns {I-35+23} from 795.0 |g(t). 
M$A{-2}=0.140 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=25.6; T{-1/2}=9.0 ns {I-24+19} from 231.9 |g(t). 
M$A{-2}=-0.104 {I5}, A{-4}=0.003 {I9}; |a(exp)=0.29 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Delayed I|g=21.3; T{-1/2}=8.7 ns {I-48+37} from 588.3 |g(t). 
M$A{-2}=0.137 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
TI$combined I(|g+ce) for 378.3 and 488.2 transitions, deduced by compiler from transition intensity balance at 1562.6 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$10 in 2022Bo04. 
TI$combined I(|g+ce)=98 {I8} for 10.2 and 115.0 transitions, deduced by compiler from transition intensity balance at 2048.5 level. From transition intensity balance at 2038.3 level, I(|g+ce)=95 {I8} for the 10.2 transition and the remaining |?3 for the 115.0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$85 in 2022Bo04. 
TI$deduced by compiler from transition intensity balance at the 2133.8 level 
RI$deduced by compiler from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$transition intensity balance at 2398.8 level suggests M1+E2, with |a(max)=0.48 or |d(E2/M1)|?0.45 (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$6 in 2022Bo04. 
TI$deduced by compiler from 100-I(|g+ce)(333.7 transition), assuming there are no other transitions from the 3265.5-keV isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g not observed, but inferred to exist by 1975RaYX in (n,|g). E|g and |DE|g come from the difference in level energies. 
RI$From branching ratio of I(|g+ce)(145.88)/I(|g+ce)(5.9)=0.022 {I12} in (n,|g) by 1975RaYX. 
E$This G excluded from GTOLling.... 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
MC=1.22E3 7$NC+=374 21 NC=308 17$OC=60 4$PC=5.6 3 
E$|g not observed, but inferred to exist in 1975RaYX. E|g and |DE|g come from the difference in level energies. 
E=145.89-139.97=5.92; DE=sqrt[(0.05){+2} +(0.04){+2}]=0.06 -> 0.1 
RI$From branching ratio of I(|g+ce)(145.88)/I(|g+ce)(5.9)=0.022 {I12} in 1975RaYX, assuming multipolarity M1 for 5.9|g and E2 for 145.88|g (see adopted level scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$A second |g with similar energy, tentatively placed in the level scheme by 1975RaYX, was found to be a background line in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=14 {I5} 
E$Two |g's near 348 keV were observed in 1975RaYX, but only one at 347.96 keV in 2007ChZX, with a single corresponding intensity. It is unclear which placement is correct for the latter, more precise energy, thus the energies from 1975RaYX are given (347.9 and 348.3) and the intensity from 2007ChZX given as an upper limit for both. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$292.4 5 0.12 11 RC FLAG=I FLAG=M Second Placement of G with this energy by 1975RaYX; 2007ChZX says bkgd 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=14 {I5} 
E$See comment for 347.9|g. 
E$Two G's near 348 KEV were observed in 1975RaYX, but only one with 347.96 KEV in 2007ChZX, with one corresponding intensity. It is unclear which placement is correct for the latter, more precise energy, thus the energies from 1975RaYX are given (347.9 and 348.3) and the intensity from 2007ChZX given as an upper limit for both. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$154.7 5 0.22 13 R FLAG=I 2007ChZX obs 'd bkgd line at this EG; 1975RaYX placed second G uncertainly (Out of sequence, but needed a G before a DG....) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1975RaYX; 1973Fu17 disagree, with placement instead from 1741.04-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1975RaYX; |g|g coin in 1973Fu17 disagrees, with placement instead from 471.93-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$A second |g with this energy, tentatively placed in the level scheme by 1975RaYX, was found to be a background line in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$two G's in 1975RaYX (with 417.1), but only a single G in 1967We04 with a total measured intensity of 0.15. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=1.8 {I3} 
E$Placement by |g|g coin in both 1975RaYX and 1973Fu17; 1967We04 and 1965Pr07 proposed different placements, from 757- and 1204-keV levels, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=5.6 {I5} 
E$A second |g with similar energy, placed in the level scheme by 1975RaYX, was found to be a background line in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=0.5 {I4} 
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1975RaYX; 1965Pr07 disagree, with placement instead from a 553-keV level. 
RI$two G's with EG AP 418 were observed in 1975RaYX, but only a single G in 1967We04 with a total measured intensity of 0.15. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=1.9 {I4} 
E$Placement by 1975RaYX and 1965Pr07; 1967We04 disagree, with placement instead from 1250.22-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=1.5 {I5} 
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1973Fu17 and by 1965Pr07; 1967We04 disagree, with placement instead from 1121.34-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=2.0 {I4} 
E$Placement by GG coin in 1973Fu17; 1967We04 and 1965Pr07 disagree, with Placement instead from 1204.2-keV level, but this may be the 714.86G from the 2007ChZX data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=0.4 {I3} 
$1013.5 2 0.12 9 F 
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1973Fu17 and by 1965Pr07; 1967We04 disagree, with placement instead from 2539.64-keV level. 
$The former is more consistent with the level scheme. 
E$~0.4 keV diff between EG and DEx, vs ~2.1 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Placement confirmed by |g|g coin in 1973Fu17. 1973Fu17 also observed a more intense, unplaced 424.5|g that is more consistent with the 424.81|g observed in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement by 1967We04 and 1965Pr07; 1973Fu17 disagree, with placement instead from 1013.22-keV level. 
E$from 1013 instead by GG in 1973Fu17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=0.4 {ILE} 
E$Placement by 1965Pr07; unplaced by 1973Fu17 and uncertain |g in 1967We04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=1.1 {I3} 
$was: 818.5 5 0.33 9 W 
E$Placement by 1973Fu17 and 1965Pr07; 1967We04 disagree, with placement instead from 2458.74-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=0.5 {I3} 
$was 931.5 2 0.15 9 F 
E$Placement by 1973Fu17 and 1965Pr07; 1967We04 disagree, with placement instead from 1948.87-keV level. 
$The former is more consistent with the level scheme. 
E$~0.8 keV diff between EG and DEx, vs ~4.6 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=1.4 {I2} 
$was: 950.0 2 0.42 6 F 
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1973Fu17; 1967We04 disagree, with placement instead from 1967.12-keV level. 
$The former is more consistent with the level scheme. 
E$~0.5 keV diff between EG and DEx, vs ~4.3 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$unnormalized=1.2 {I3} 
$was: 1110.6 2 0.36 9 F 
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1973Fu17; 1967We04 disagree, with placement from 1850.3-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Placement by |g|g coin in 1973Fu17. 
E$But note that the energies differ by ~2.9sigma with this Placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$The level claimed to be fed by the 1094.66|g in 1983Bu02 (E|?1118) is not seen to |g decay in that work; the authors suggest this may be due to a long halflife (T{-1/2}>500 ns) which exceeds their sensitive range. However, this |g and corresponding levels are considered to be uncertain in 1983Bu02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) in {+204}Hg(t,2n|g), {+205}Tl(|m{+-},|g), {+205}Tl(n,n'|g) and Coulomb excitation; conversion electron measurements in {+205}Tl(p,p') 
CC$0.46 {i4} from |a(K)exp=0.29 {I4} + |a(L)exp=0.132 {I6} + |a(M+...)exp=0.0397 {I34} (1982Gi11) in {+205}Tl(p,p'). Anomalous conversion coefficient, penetration factor |l=13.1 {I27} (1982Gi11). 
MR$From {+205}Tl(p,p') (1982Gi11). Others: 2 {I1} in {+204}Hg(t,2n|g) (1984Be14), +1.00 {I5} in {+205}Tl(|m{+-},|g), +1.7 {I+50-8} in {+205}Tl(n,n'|g) and +1.56 {I15} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From Coulomb excitation. 
M$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(n,n'|g) and Coulomb excitation, and |a(exp) in {+207}Pb(|m{+-},2n|g). 
MR$Weighted average of |d=-0.066 {I14} (1973Kr02) and -0.073 {I16} (1979Ha06) in Coulomb excitation. Others: -0.05 in Coulomb excitation (1958Mc02) and +0.09 {I12} in {+205}Tl(n,n'|g) (1977Da06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$Rounded off value from adopted gammas. E|g=192 keV {I8} was determined from calorimetric measurements in 2012Be06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from HI|gS experiment. Other: 78 {I2} in S-DALINAC, Darmstadt experiment 
$W(90|')/W(130|')=0.87 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from HI|gS experiment. Other: 65 {I2} in S-DALINAC, Darmstadt experiment 
$W(90|')/W(130|')=0.93 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.29 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.132 {I6} and |a(M+...)exp=0.0397 {I34} (1982Gi11). Values determined relative to |a(K)exp(279|g)=0.1639 {I10} in {+203}Tl 
CC$From the measured |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M+...)exp values in 1982Gi11. This is an anomalous value, due to penetration effect, with a penetration parameter |l=13.1 {I27}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.949 {I50} (1973Kr02); A{-2}=0.824 {I24} (1979Ha06). 
MR$From 1973Kr02. Others: 1.4 {I+3-2} (1979Ha06) and 1.46 {I16} (1958Mc02). Penetration parameter |l=13.5 {I25} (1973Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.497 {I25} (1973Kr02); A{-2}=-0.475 {I34} (1979Ha06). 
MR$From 1973Kr02. Others: -0.073 {I16} (1979Ha06) and -0.05 (1958Mc02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.092, |a(L)exp=0.057 and |a(M)exp=0.013 (1976TuZY); |a(K)exp=0.15 {I6} and K/L=1.5 {I3} (1961Ru02) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.37, |a(L)exp=0.060 and |a(M)exp=0.017 (1976TuZY); |a(K)exp=0.26 {I1} and K/L=6.3 {I1} (1961Ru02) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 and |a(L)exp=0.074 (1976TuZY) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y). Others: 95 {I14} in {+205}Tl(n,|g)E=th. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.18 and |a(L)exp=0.038 (1976TuZY) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average 23.6 {I42} in {+205}Tl(n,|g)E=th., 27.6 {I35} in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) and 25 {I5} in {+206}Hg |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.15 and |a(L)exp=0.033 (1976TuZY) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$From {+206}Hg |b{+-} decay (1970As05) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 (1976TuZY) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y); |g|g(|q) in {+205}Tl(n,|g)E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance considerations by assuming that there is no direct |b{+-} feeding to the 2- level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$ Others: E|g=267.7 keV {I2}, I|g=100 (1967Sp07) and E|g=266 keV, I|g=100 (1969La18) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.092, |a(L)exp=0.057 and |a(M)exp=0.013 (1976TuZY); |a(K)exp=0.15 {I6} and K/L=1.5 {I3} (1961Ru02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: E|g=304.8 keV {I3} (1967Sp07) and 305 keV (1969La18) 
RI$Unweighted average I|g=55.4 (1976TuZY), 54 (1967Sp07) and 54 (1969La18). A conservative |DI|g=5% was estimated by the evaluator 
M$|a(K)exp=0.37, |a(L)exp=0.060 and |a(M)exp=0.017 (1976TuZY); |a(K)exp=0.26 {I1} and K/L=6.3 {I1} (1961Ru02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: E|g=329.1 keV {I8} (1967Sp07) and 329 keV (1969La18) 
RI$Unweighted average I|g=1.46 (1976TuZY), 1.1 (1969La18) and |?2 (1967Sp07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 and |a(L)exp=0.074 (1976TuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: E|g=369.6 keV {I10} (1967Sp07) and 368 keV (1969La18) 
RI$Unweighted average I|g=1.25 (1976TuZY), 1.3 (1969La18) and |?1 (1967Sp07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.18 and |a(L)exp=0.038 (1976TuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From a |g-ray spectrum collected with isotopically separated source (1976TuZY) 
E$Other: 634 keV (1969La18) 
RI$Other: 0.02 (1969La18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: E|g=344.0 keV {I10} (1967Sp07) and 344 keV (1969La18) 
RI$Unweighted average I|g=1.40 (1976TuZY), 1.4 (1969La18) and |?2 (1967Sp07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.15 and |a(L)exp=0.033 (1976TuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: E|g=649.8 keV {I10} (1967Sp07) and 651 keV (1969La18) 
RI$Unweighted average I|g=7.7 (1976TuZY), 5.6 (1969La18) and |?4 (1967Sp07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 (1976TuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 265.86 keV {I9} (2007ChZX), 266.1 keV {I6} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 266.1 keV {I5} (1969Ra10) 
RI$Others: 93.3 {I31} (2007ChZX), 142 {I107} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 13.0 {I26} (1969Ra10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: 304.86 keV {I9} (2007ChZX), 304.9 keV {I4} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 304.6 keV {I5} (1969Ra10) 
RI$Others: 100.0 {I53} (2007ChZX), 158 {I53} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 7.8 {I16} (1969Ra10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: 330.09 keV {I9} (2007ChZX), 330.2 keV {I4} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
RI$Others: 118.7 {I44} (2007ChZX), 82 {I18} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Others: 649.30 keV {I15} (2007ChZX), 649.4 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
RI$Others: 47.1 {I44} (2007ChZX), 66 {I9} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 682|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3}; 711|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.49 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}; 837|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1}; 1194|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}; 1592|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7}; 5853|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.48 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 535.5 keV {I16} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
RI$Other: 14 {I7} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 598|g-536|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2}; 1042|g-536|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.09 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4}; 5504|g-536|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 732.3 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
RI$Other: 59 {I18} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
M,MR$From 5504|g-732|g(|q) in 2025Ci01 with A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Other: 711.0 keV {I4} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
RI$Other: 12 {I7} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 711|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.49 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}; 5143|g-711|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1055.2 keV {I4} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
RI$Other: 20 {I5} (1967We04, 1969WeZY) 
M$From 5143|g-1055|g(|q) in 2025Ci01 with A{-2}=-0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 4659|g-1194|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}; 1194|g-650|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 1049|g-1332|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.52 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}; 1049|g-1027|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.30 {I6}, A{-4}=0.02 {I9}; 4123|g-1049|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.04 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 1264|g-1117|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.52 {I4}, A{-4}=0.01 {I7}; 4123|g-1264|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 4123|g-1049|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.04 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I11}; 4123|g-1264|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}; 4123|g-2076|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Others: 4662.5 keV {I4} (1974Co21), 4662 keV {I3} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 4659 keV {I2} (1970BaZU), 4659.4 keV {I10} (1969Ra10) 
RI$Others: 6.9 {I3} (1974Co21), 5.3 {I18} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 3.7 {I16} (1970BaZU), 4.6 {I9} (1969Ra10) 
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 4659|g-1194|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}; 4659|g-1208|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}; 4659|g-1578|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}; 4659|g-1843|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 5015.7 keV {I4} (1974Co21), 5015 keV {I3} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5015.0 keV {I5} (1969Ra10) 
RI$Others: 53.4, used as a normalization in 1969Ra10, 1974Co21, 1967We04, 1969WeZY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Others: 5143.8 keV {I7} (1974Co21), 5144 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5142 keV {I3} (1970BaZU) 
RI$Others: 24.9 {I53} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 20.1 {I90} (1970BaZU), 4.3 {I3} (1974Co21) 
M$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 5143|g-711|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}; 5143|g-1055|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Other: 5387 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5385 keV {I2} (1970BaZU) 
RI$Other: 3.6 {I18} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 9.0 {I62} (1970BaZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1967We04, 1969WeZY. Other: E|g=5419 keV {I3}, I|g=28.3 {I90} (1970BaZU). Not observed in 2025Ci01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 5504.5 keV {I3} (1974Co21), 5506 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5504 keV {I2} (1970BaZU), 5503.3 keV {I10} (1969Ra10) 
RI$Others: 44.5 {I89} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 57 {I16} (1970BaZU), 3.3 {I7} (1969Ra10), 10.1 {I5} (1974Co21) 
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 2025Ci01: 5504|g-536|g(|q) with A{-2}=0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}; 5504|g-998|g(|q) with A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3}; 5504|g-732|g(|q) in 2025Ci01 with A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 5554.2 keV {I7} (1974Co21), 5854 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5853 keV {I4} (1970BaZU), 5853.3 keV {I10} (1969Ra10), 5852.5 keV {I5} (2007ChZX) 
RI$Others: 28.5 {I53} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 23.4 {I29} (1970BaZU), 3.3 {I7} (1969Ra10), 32.0 {I67} (2007ChZX), 4.7 {I3} (1974Co21) 
M$From 5853|g-650|g(|q) in 2025Ci01 with A{-2}=0.48 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1,M2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 5868.4 keV {I3} (1974Co21), 5869 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5867 keV {I3} (1970BaZU), 5867.0 keV {I10} (1969Ra10), 5867.8 keV {I4} (2007ChZX) 
RI$Others: 32.0 {I53} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 27.1 {I16} (1970BaZU), 5.2 {I10} (1969Ra10), 40.4 {I76} (2007ChZX), 6.9 {I3} (1974Co21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 6198.7 keV {I3} (1974Co21), 6199 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 6197 keV {I2} (1970BaZU), 6199.4 keV {I5} (1969Ra10), 6197.8 keV {I4} (2007ChZX) 
RI$Others: 49.8 {I89} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 36.1 {I37} (1970BaZU), 7.2 {I14} (1969Ra10), 48.4 {I76} (2007ChZX), 11.3 {I6} (1974Co21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1,M2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 6237.1 keV {I7} (1974Co21), 6238 keV {I2} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 6238 keV {I2} (1970BaZU) 
RI$Others: 17.8 {I53} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 5.3 {I8} (1970BaZU), 3.8 {I3} (1974Co21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 6504.3 keV {I6} (2007ChZX) 6504 keV {I3} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 6504 keV {I4} (1970BaZU) 
RI$Others: 17.8 {I44} (2007ChZX), 7.1 {I36} (1967We04, 1969WeZY), 3.7 {I8} (1970BaZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+211}Bi |a decay 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.204 {I4} in 1966Go13, 0.195 {I15} (1966Go13), 0.18 (1965Va10), 0.175 {I17} (1964Co22), 0.20 {I1} (1960Pe05). Also: |a(L)exp=0.033 {I5} (1960Pe05) 
MR$Based on angular correlations and |g-ray polarization measurements in 1966Go13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 351.06 {I12} (1988Hi14), 351.0 {I1} (1968Br17), 350.7 {I3} (1967Da10) 
RI$From I|a/(1+|a); Others: 14.0 {I14} (1967Da10); 12.3 {I6} (1976Bl13) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.204 {I4} in 1966Go13, 0.195 {I15} (1966Go13), 0.18 (1965Va10), 0.175 {I17} (1964Co22), 0.20 {I1} (1960Pe05); Also: |a(L)exp=0.033 {I5} (1960Pe05) 
MR$Based on angular correlations and |g-ray polarization measurements in 1966Go13; Other: 0.194 {I21} from |a(K)exp=0.204 {I4} (1966Go13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted dataset of {+207}Tl in ENSDF database. 
RI$absolute photon intensity measured by 2015Pi10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$reported in |b{+-} decay with I|g/I|g(433|g)=0.48, but this transition is not seen in |a decay. From the E(level) difference one expects E|g=164.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from the B|*|r measurements of 1956Si23, recalculated by the evaluator using revised fundamental constants (1987Co39) and electron binding energies (1967Be73) 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N12:o12=1000 {I25}:106 {I5}:8.2 {I33}:262 {I15}:30 {I5}:6.2 {I25}: 76 {I4}:10 {I4} (1963Se20). L1:L2:L3:M1:N:O=1000:92:8.0:231:57:13 (1957Zh05). |a=22.6 {I5} from |a|g-coin (1966Il01). From L3/L1, |d<0.012 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.230 {I15} (1955Ni19), 0.27 {I2} (1967Be19), 0.31 {I3} from (K| x ray)|g/|g (1966Il01). L1/K=0.23 {I+7-6} (1963Da11). L/K=0.15 {I4} (1967Be19), 0.21 {I4} (1955Ni19). Other: |a(K)exp=0.30 (1957Vo22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.43 {I12} (1967Be19), 0.25 {I9} (1955Ni19). Other: 0.12 (1957Vo22), 0.13 {I7} (1963Da11) using authors Ice(K)/Ice(K)(328|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.079 {I18} (1967Be19), 0.100 {I15} (1966Il01). 0.053 {I15} (1955Ni19). Other: 0.12 (1957Vo22). The value of 1966Il01 is from (K| x ray)|g/|g for the unresolved 473+493|g; however, the 493|g is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.086 {I22} (1978Av01), normalized to mult(583|g)=E2 in {+208}Tl |b{+-} decay, 0.115 {I6} (1967Be19), 0.100 {I7} (1955Ni19). Other: 0.11 (1957Vo22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$I(ce(K))=0.009 (1957Vo22) not seen by 1967Be19 who report I|g<0.01. These data give |a(K)exp>0.9, requiring mult |>M4 or an E0 component. The placement is not consistent with mult=E0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 323.81 keV {I5} (1977Vy02), 323.7 keV {I2} (1981Di14), 323.71 keV {I3} (1989Ko26), 323.69 keV {I5} (1998Ar03), 323.69 keV {I1} (1994Ar23) and 323.80 keV {I4} (2000Gr35). Other measurement: 1964Gr11 
RI$from I|g(323|g)/I|g(440|g in {+213}Po)=0.00639 {I12} (weighted average of 0.0062 {I3} (2000Gr35), 0.0057 {I5} (1998Ar03), 0.0057 {I4} (1994Ar23), 0.0062 {I6} (1989Ko26) and 0.00660 {I15} (1981Di14)) and %I|g(440|g)=26.10 {I17} (weighted average of 26.1 {I3} (1986He06) and 26.1 {I2} (2002Mo46). The latter value supersedes that of 25.4 {I3} (2000Gr35), which is from the same laboratory). The value of I|g(323|g)/I|g(440|g in {+213}Po)=0.0112 {I8} (1977Vy02) is excluded from the average, since it is much higher than others and is also superseded by 2000Gr35. Other: %I|g=0.154 {I3} from %I|a=8.45 {I11}, %|a=2.140 {I10} and |a. 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.131 {I15} (2000Gr35). Other (from the same group): |a(K)exp=0.40 {I9} (1998MaZO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; ce only were observed, E(ce) unstated by authors. 
M from {+188}Po |a decay, based on observation of ce-|a coin but absence of |g-|a coin in {+188}Po |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. 
M conversion electrons only are observed in coincidence with 7350|a (1999An52). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Comparable 424.1|g placed from 8{++}{-2} to 6{++}{-2} in Adopted Level scheme from ({+83}Kr,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$energy from level energy difference; intensity is from recoil-gated |a tagged 0{-2}{++} to 0{-1}{++} K electrons with a gate on the 392|g transition (2022Oj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From 2022Zh22 based on systematics of neighbouring {+185}Hg. Mult=E2 (or less likely E1) from upper limits of |a(K)exp extracted from measured K{-|a,|b} x-rays, which are attributed by the authors mainly to the decay of the isomeric transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$no intensity could be deduced for the unresolved 314.7-keV doublet, as stated in the data table received from the first author. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$Transition energy from measured E(ce)(K). No E|g has been observed. 
M$from K:L = 5:1 from ce data in {+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g) (1999Le61). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Transition energy from the measured E(ce)(K). Note that the energy overlaps with the much stronger 723.9|g, E2 2+ to 0+ transition. 
M$K:L = 5.4:1.0 from ce data in {+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g) (1999Le61). The measured large |a(K)exp=0.044 {I5} for the doublet 725|g indicate E0 component. A 767 keV {I12} E0 transition was reported in {+192}Po |a decay (1998Al27), but the population of this state was questioned in the later {+192}Po |a decay work (2003Va16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I15}, |a(exp)=2.9 {I5} from {+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g); E0 component inferred from large |a(exp) and A{-2} implies large E2 component. An M1 admixture should be expected, if K Ne 0 for the initial and final states. 
CC$From |a(exp) in 2004Dr04 ({+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.31 {I18}, |a(exp)=2.4 {I3}; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp) and A{-2} implies large E2 component. An M1 admixture should be expected, if K Ne 0 for the initial and final states. 
CC$From |a(exp) in 2004Dr04 ({+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=1.3 {I3}; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp). An M1 admixture should be expected, if K Ne 0 for the initial and final states. 
CC$From |a(exp) in 2004Dr04 ({+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)|?0.3; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp). An M1 admixture should be expected,if K Ne 0 for the initial and final states. 
CC$From |a(exp) in 2004Dr04 ({+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp>0.13, K/L=5 {I1} (1999Le61). Level populated 2-4 % of the intensity of the 2+ to 0+ transition (1999Le61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$doublet with the strong 723.5|g, 2+ to 0+ transition. |a(K)exp=0.044 {I5}, K/L=5.4 {I10} for the doublet. |a(K)=0.0098 expected for E2 (1999Le61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I15}, |a(exp)=2.9 {I5}; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp) and A{-2} implies large E2 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.31 {I18}, |a(exp)=2.4 {I3}; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp) and A{-2} implies large E2 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=1.3 {I3}; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp). An M1 admixture should be expected, if K Ne 0 for the initial and final states. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)|?0.3; E0 component inferred from large |a(exp). An M1 admixture should be expected, if K Ne 0 for the initial and final states. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Due to poor statistics, firm coincidence evidence of the placement of the 335.1-keV |g ray from recoil-isomer-tagged prompt |g|g spectra is lacking. Present placement is based on systematic arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
ECC$|a(K)exp multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to include higher shells. Other: |a(exp)=0.40 {I35} (2005Ba51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, |a(M)exp from 2009Dr03 
$L-conversion line contaminated by K lines of 267|g and 272|g, and M conversion line contaminated by K line of 279|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, |a(M)exp from 2009Dr03. Other: |a(exp)=0.30 {I30} (2005Ba51) 
$ ECC=0.30 30 (2005Ba51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from I|a 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(exp) 
M$|a(exp)=1.1 {I4} (2002Va13) 
ECC$from Adopted Gammas, based on |a(K)exp=0.41 {i16} (2009Dr03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from I|a 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(exp) 
M$|a(exp)=0.34 {I16} (2002Va13) 
ECC$|a(K)exp multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to include higher shells 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp deduced from K-x ray and |g intensities obtained from recoil-isomer tagged |g|g matrix with a gate on the 389-keV transition. In this procedure, theoretical x-ray intensities from the internal conversion of the 419-, 435-, and 413-keV |g-rays was subtracted from the total x-ray intensity, with the assumption of M1 for 413, 419 and 435 |g rays. If E1 is assumed for all these three |g rays, then |a(K)exp=1.35 {I4} (2015Ho14) for 206.4|g, inconsistent with either the E1 or M1 for this transition 
$R(|q)=0.56 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Due to poor statistics, firm coincidence evidence of the placement of the 335.1-keV |g ray from recoil-isomer-tagged prompt |g|g spectra is lacking. Present placement is based on systematic arguments 
$R(|q)=0.38 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M From measured total conversion coefficient {+195}Po |a Decay (4.64 s) (2002Va13). 
CC Measured value in 2010Co13 {+195}Po |a Decay (4.64 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M From measured conversion coefficient in {+195}Po (1.92 s) |a decay. 
CC Measured value in {+195}Po (1.92 s) |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 818.5 {I2} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) and 818.70 {I5} from ({+16}O,5n|g) 
M Other: (E2) in ({+16}O,5n|g), but no conversion coefficient datum is available. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 893.4 {I4} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) and 893.50 {I10} from ({+16}O,5n|g). 
M Other: (M1) in ({+16}O,5n|g), but no conversion coefficient datum is available. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 551.2 {I6} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) and 551.30 {I15} from ({+16}O,5n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 59 {I6} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) and 69 {I13} from ({+16}O,5n|g) 
M Suggested (M1) in ({+16}O,5n|g) (1999La06), but no supporting data was provided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 219.25 {I15} from ({+16}O,5n|g) and 218.5 {I6} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) 
RI$Other: 95 {I15} ({+16}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 212.60 {I20} from ({+16}O,5n|g) and 212.2 {I6} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) 
RI$Other: 100 {I30} ({+16}O,5n|g) 
M Suggested (E2) in 1999La06 ({+16}O,5n|g), but no supporting is available. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 781.10 {I15} from ({+16}O,5n|g) and 780.9 {I4} from ({+24}Mg,6n|g) 
RI$Other: 46 {I10} ({+16}O,5n|g) 
M Other: (M1) in ({+16}O,5n|g), but no supporting data is available. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
The existence of this unobserved |g transition is required by coincidence data in {+173}Yb({+24}Mg,6n|g) dataset (1998Fo02). 
M Considering J|p for the initial and final states in ({+24}Mg,6n|g) 1998Fo02, an E2 multipolarity, or higher, is expected for this |g ray. On the other hand, a M1 character is suggested in 1999La06 {+180}W({+16}O,5n|g), based on the ratio of reduced transition probabilities. 
E The energy is estimated from energy sum relations provided by the proposed level scheme in ({+24}Mg,6n|g) dataset (1998Fo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$The energy for this unobserved |g ray is estimated from energy sum relations provided by the proposed level scheme in ({+24}Mg,6n|g) (1998Fo02), and assuming that the energy value for the 72 keV |g ray is correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 597 {I1} (2002Va13). Placement from coincidences with the 6030|a transition (2002Va13). 
M From measured total conversion coefficient (2002Va13). Theoretical values are: |a(M1)=0.0676 {I10}, |a(E1)=0.0067 {I1}, |a(E2)=0.0194 {I3}. The difference from the experimental value is attributed to the large E0 component (2010Co13). 
CC Measured value reported in 2010Co13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 670 {1} (2002Va13) 
M from measured total conversion coefficient (2002Va13). Theoretical values are: |a(M1)=0.0501 {I7}, |a(M2)=0.133 {I2}, |a(E2)=0.0151 {I2}. The difference from the experimental value is attributed to the E0 component (2002Va13). 
CC Measured value in 2002Va13, deduced from conversion electron spectra gated by 6050|a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=1.05 {I7} 
M This stretched Q transition is assumed to be a stretched E2 in 1998Fo02, based on systematics of similar transitions in heavier neighboring Pb nuclei, and the assumed configuration for the connected levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=1.75 {I10} (|DJ=1 gated) 
M from DCO ratio and assuming that the transition of 893.4 keV has stretched M1 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=2.3 {I4} (|DJ=1 gated) 
M from DCO ratio, assuming that the transition of 893.4 keV has stretched M1 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
The existence of this unobserved |g transition is required by coincidence data (1998Fo02). 
E The energy is estimated from energy sum relations provided by the proposed level scheme (1998Fo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
The existence of this unobserved transition has been suggested in 1998Fo02 based on coincidence data, as part of a possible alternate path for the deexcitation of the 2512.0 keV level, following the previous decay of that level via the (unobserved, see below) 72 keV |g ray. See also Comments for the 94.6 keV |g ray. 
E The energy for this unobserved |g ray is estimated by 1998Fo02 from energy sum relations provided by the proposed level scheme and assuming that the energy value for the 72 keV |g ray is correct. Note that in the text of 1998Fo02 a value of 23.6 keV is listed, while in the level scheme shown in that same reference the authors quote a value of 22.6 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.99 {I10} 
M From DCO ratio and assuming that the 818.5 keV transition has a stretched E2 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Unobserved transition, expected from systematics (1998Fo02), connecting to the 2439.6 keV level. Support from coincidences seen by 1998Fo02. 
E From systematics of dipole bands in other odd-A Pb isotopes (1998Fo02). See also Comment for the 2512+x keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
The existence of this unobserved transition has been suggested in 1998Fo02 as a possible alternate path for the deexcitation of the 2512+x keV level. If valid, it should connect to the 2416.9 keV level. See also Comments for the 22.6 keV |g ray. 
E The energy for this unobserved |g ray is estimated by 1998Fo02 from energy sum relations provided by the proposed level scheme and assuming that the energy value for the 72 keV |g ray is correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.47 {I8} 
M Tentative multipolarity suggested by 1998Fo02, on the basis of the DCO ratio and in analogy with M1 bands in heavier Pb isotopes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<1.51 {i18}, |a(L1+L2)exp<0.32 {i6}, |a(M)exp>0.080 {i22} (mixed with the 270.80 keV transition K line), |a(K)/|a(L)exp=5.9 {i14}, |a(L)/|a(M)exp>3.5 {i9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 24.2 {I10} from ({+24}Mg,5n|g), 22.9 {I24} from ({+16}O,6n|g) and 13 {I5} from |e decay. 
M D from DCO in ({+24}Mg,5n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI from ({+24}Mg,5n|g). Others: 29 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g), 17 {I8} from |e decay. Weighted average of all three data is 16 {I4}. 
M,MR from |a(K)exp in ({+16}O,6n|g). Note, however, that B(M2)(W.u.) exceeds RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E from ({+16}O,6n|g). 
M from |a(K)exp. However, note that |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp and |a(L3)exp are inconsistent with |a(K)exp in ({+16}O,6n|g). Also, B(E3)(W.u.) exceeds RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
K/L=5.2 {I7} (1990Tr01). 
Placement based on absence of coincidences between 853.8|g and 768.5-transition ce. 
TI |S(Ice(K)+(Ice(L)+Ice(M)) (1987Va09). 
M from comparison of ce and |g-ray spectra in 650-850 keV region (K, L, M ce lines, but no corresponding photopeak, are observed), and coincidences with Pb K x rays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
KC=0.0141,LC=0.00232,MC=0.00054,NC+=0.00017 FOR E1 
|a(K)exp=0.026 {I10} (corrected for contribution from E1 383.9|g of {+192}Tl decay, but Ice(K) also includes |DJ=(0) 383.9 transition in {+192}Pb) (1987Va09)); authors favor mult=E1, inconsistent with adopted value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Intensity determination not possible (1987Va09). However, if J|p(2520) is 8+, no significant |e feeding to that level is expected; I(|g+ce) balance at that level then implies I(|g+ce)(61)=9.3 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E rounded value from Adopted Gammas; conversion electrons observed in coincidence with 5769|a (1989De18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0052 {I15} (1991La07). 
RI I(|g+ce)(502|g)/I(|g+ce)(854|g)=0.90 {I20} in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) (1979Ro06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.004 {I3} (1991La07). 
RI I(|g+ce)(504|g)/I(|g+ce)(854|g)=0.50 {I20} in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) (1979Ro06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0051 {I10} (1991La07). 
RI I(|g+ce)(565|g)/I(|g+ce)(854|g)=0.50 {I10} in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) (1979Ro06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0085 {I17} (1991La07). 
RI I(|g+ce)(463|g)/I(|g+ce)(854|g)=0.45 {I15} in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) (1979Ro06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0016 {I8} (1991La07). 
RI I(|g+ce)(600|g)/I(|g+ce)(854|g)=0.34 {I10} in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) (1979Ro06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI I(|g+ce)|<41 {I4} from I(|g+ce) balance at 2521 level, so I|g|<0.63 {I6} if mult is E2. 
RI I(|g+ce)(61|g)/I(|g+ce)(854|g)|<0.34 in ({+40}Ar,4n|g) (1979Ro06), from intensity balance at 2521 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)|<121 from I(|g+ce) balance at 2514 level. 
M (L1+L2)/L3=3.0 {I5} (1991La07). Also, 1979Ro06 report that E1 is the only mult compatible with their observed photon intensities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M 1991La07 report that the 44-keV transition is a fully converted E2 transition, but present no experimental data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.114 {I15} (1991La07). 
M |a(K)exp favors E3, but |a(K)exp, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp and |a(L3)exp are mutually inconsistent. Note that B(E3)(W.u.) for this transition exceeds RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 2057.7 {I6} (1997Mc02) and 2058.9 {I8} (2003WiZZ). 
Placement is from 2003Wi04. 1997Mc02 tentatively placed |g feeding the (9)- 2514.4 level rather than the (10)+ 2581 level; however, it is present in data correlated with delayed transitions, so it either feeds an isomer or, alternatively, a higher-lying level that feeds an isomer. The decay curve of the level it feeds identifies the isomer as the (10)+ 2581 level. 
Other I(|g+ce): 0.041 {I12} (1997Mc02); 0.08 from fig. 3 of 2003Wi04. 
M A{-2}=+0.44 {I19} (2003Wi04), consistent with |DJ=0 or 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
In prompt coincidence with 262-keV SD band transition and with transitions below the isomers (2003Wi04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 262.5 {I3} (1995Du07), 263.0 (1995As04). 
Other I(|g+ce): 0.75 {I13} (1991He11); 0.65 from fig. 3 of 2003Wi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
Not in prompt coincidence with 262-keV SD band transition or with transitions below the isomers (2003Wi04). 
Other I(|g+ce): 0.02 from fig. 3 of 2004Wi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.6 {I5} (2003Wi04), consistent with |DJ=0 or 2. 
Other I(|g+ce): 0.02 from fig. 3 of 2003Wi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 304.2 {I4} (1995Du07). 
Other I(|g+ce): 1.06 {I13} (1991He11); 0.98 from fig. 3 of 2003Wi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI |g not observed; E|g is from level energy difference. An upper limit of 8% is estimated by authors for this branch. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from 2001Dr05. Other: 120 (2007Io03). 
RI I|g(439.8):I|g(162.4):I|g(120.6)=11.1 {I10}:68.1 {I14}:20.8 {I8} (2001Dr05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E from 2007Io03; not reported by 1993Pl02, 2001Dr05 or 2010Wi08. 
% branching (=1.2 {I3}) and E|g are from 2007Io03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)/I(|g+ce)(946.5|g)=0.14 {I3} (1993Pl02). 
In fig 1 of 1993Pl02, a 627.1|g is also placed from a tentative 5477 level but that placement is not included in table 4 so it is not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
DCO ratio=0.73 {I5} (delayed); 0.61 {I10} (prompt). 
I(|g+ce)/I(|g+ce)(935.8|g)=0.50 {I10}; 1993Pl02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
DCO ratio=1.22 {I11} for doublet. From level scheme, |DJ=1 for for this transition. 
I(|g+ce)(doublet)/I(|g+ce)(935.8|g)=0.51 {I10} (1993Pl02) if |a(434|g)=0.042. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$From ({+24}Mg,5n|g). Other: 32 {i14} ({+16}O,5n|g) 
M |a{-K}(exp)=1.14 {i13}, |a{-L12}(exp)=0.11 {i6}; Theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.829 
 
$Evaluator's comment: 
M The angular distribution coefficients (30SI,5NG) and DCO (24MG,5NG) indicate a stretched quadrupole, but this is in disagreement with the measured |a{-K}. A possible explanation for the anomalously high |a(K) conversion coefficient might be a significant E0 component in the transition, |DJ=0. 
 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From ({+24}Mg,5n|g). 
M$From |a{-K}(exp)=0.0038 {i28} in 1991La07 ({+16}O,5n|g); theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.00785. (M1+E2) in 2011Ba02 ({+28}Si,5n|g). See level comments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From ({+30}Si,5n|g) and RUL 
B(M1)=1.1 {i2} |m{-N}{+2} (2005Gl09 ({+28}Si,5n|g)). 
1991La07 show a 253.6 keV |g deexciting their level at 3220 keV. This level is not established by later publications. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$From ({+30}Si,5n|g) and RUL. 
2005Gl09 ({+28}Si,5n|g) estimate B(M1)|>1.4 |m{-N}{+2}. 
1991La07 show a 381.7 keV |g deexciting their level at 2967 keV. This level is not confirmed in the newer references. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 15 {I6} ({+30}Si,5n|g) can be obtained from total intensity assuming 409.5|g as (E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$1996Ba54 ({+24}Mg,5n|g) place a 581.4-keV transition as deexciting their level at 4441 keV. This level has no analogue in the scheme of 1996Du18 ({+30}Si,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.19 {i11}. 
M The angular distribution coefficient value indicates stretched quadrupole. (M1) in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=1.04 {i26} indicates Q, however, placement 25/2+ to 25/2+ 
The evidence for the multipolarity of this transition is ambiguous (see 1996Du18, 1991La07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.63 {i13} indicates d(+Q), placement 27/2 to 25/2+ in 1996Ba54. 25/2+ at 2213.8+x is 23/2+ in Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
This |g ray not reported in other references. The closest match is the 330.4-keV transition from 1996Du18, placed there as deexciting their 6927-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
This |g ray may be the same as the 540.4 keV transition from 1996Du18, who place it as deexciting their 3822-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
This |g ray has not been reported in other references. 1996Du18 list a 739.7 keV |g with I|g=23.3 {i14}. The sum of the |g intensities of the 739.0 and 739.5 keV |transitions from the present authors is 20.8 {i40}. Therefore the transition seen in 1996Du18 may be an unresolved doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.51 {i16}. From a comparison of the total intensity for the 462.6 keV transition with that for the one of 164.3 keV, the authors argue that this |g ray cannot have an M1 multipolarity, leading to an E1 assignment. While the resultant I(|g+ce)=8.4 {i24} is then in very good agreement with that reported in 1996Du18, the required parity change also implies that one (or possibly more) of the transitions on top of the 4001.5-keV level have to be of parity-changing character. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.48 {i21}. The multipolarity of this transition is in doubt, since the authors, based on intensity balance arguments, suggest an E1 character, and therefore a parity change between the connected levels. This change does not agree with the proposed character of positive-parity levels suggested by 1996Du18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.52 {i16} 
E a comparable 196.9|g placed as deexciting 4388+x in Adopted Levels. In 1996Ba54, authors propose it to be the lowest member of the cascade of magnetic dipole transitions in Band 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.44 {i12} 
E This |g ray has been placed by 1996Du18 as deexciting their 4769-keV level, which is not established by the present authors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO=0.53 {i11} 
This |g ray has been placed by 1996Du18 as deexciting their 5815-keV level (Band 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.24 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {i8}. |a{-K}(exp)=0.0225 {i15}, |a{-L12}(exp)=0.00433 {i32}, |a{-L3}(exp)=0.0011 {i3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}(exp)=1.14 {i13}, |a{-L12}(exp)=0.107 {i57}; Theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.829. The anomalously high |a(K) conversion coefficient might be due to a significant E0 component in the transition, |DJ=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M,MR From |a{-K}(exp)=1.9 {i16}, |a{-L12}(exp)=0.21 {i12}; Also A{-2}=-0.29 {i6}, A{-4}=+0.33 {i12}. theory: |a{-K}(E1)=0.0594, |a{-K}(M2)=4.18, |a{-L12}(E1)=0.0090, |a{-L12}(M2)=1.087. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.10 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {i5}. |a{-K}(exp)=0.0208 {i22}, |a{-L12}(exp)=0.0091 {i15} 
MR Average of |d=0.08 {I+3-5} from |a{-K}, and |d=0.20 {I+3-4} from |a{-L12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L12/L3)(exp)=0.93 {i19}, |a(L/M)(exp)=5.1 {i17}; theory: |a(L12/L3)(M1)=125.2, |a(L12/L3)(E2)=1.23, |a(L/M)(M1)=4.26, |a(L/M)(E2)=3.79. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$ 2011Ba02 revised the assignment. E2 in earlier literature/evaluation (1991La07, 2006Ac01) 
$ R{-ADO}=1.0 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 965.0 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay, 965.1 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 965.1 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 575.0 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay, 575.1 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 575.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from {+194}Bi |e decay. Others: 100 {I11} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 100 {I12} from ({+16}O,6n|g), and 100 {I6} from (HI,xn|g):SD 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 280.3 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 280.1 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 280.2 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 594.7 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 594.9 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 594.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$deduced by 2005Dr11 in ({+30}Si,4n|g) from total conversion coefficient obtained from delayed intensity balances (not given in 2005Dr11 explicitly) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 421.0 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 420.9 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 421.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 166.2 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 166.3 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 166.2 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 178.5 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 178.3 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 178.1 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.1 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 196.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 196.4 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 24.4 {I22} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 40 {I12} from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 78 {I17} from ({+16}O,6n|g) is discrepant 
M$from ce data in {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and |g asymmetry in (HI,xn|g):SD 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 302.5 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 302.1 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 302.6 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s). Others: 100 {I16} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 100 {I28} from ({+16}O,6n|g), and 100 {I23} from (HI,xn|g):SD 
M$from ce data in {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 261.1 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 260.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 260.5 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 173.9 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 173.6 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 173.7 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Bi |e decay; tentative placement by 1996Lo12 in (HI,xn|g):SD. Other: 788 from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ce data in {+194}Bi |e decay (1987Va09). Other: 47.0 from ce data in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) (1991Fa05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 664.2 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 664.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 671.8 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s), 672.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 672.3 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Others: 493.2 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 493.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 304.8 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 304.9 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 304.4 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g) (2005Dr11). Others: 100 {I27} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 100 {I20} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
M$from ce data in ({+16}O,6n|g) (1986Pa18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 352.3 {I2} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 351.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 351.4 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g) (2005Dr11). Others: 159 {I21} from {+194}Bi |e decay (125 s+115 s) and 164 {I10} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) are discrepant 
M$from ce data and |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,6n|g), ce data in ({+36}S,4n|g), and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Other: ce(K) data in {+194}Bi|e decay gives E2, but the ce(K) line is very weak (1987Va09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 495.3 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 496 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g). Not seen in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g) (2005Dr11). Other: I(496|g)/I(352|g)=100 {I38}/100 {I25} in({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 705.3 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 705.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 52 {I13} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 33 {I10} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 787.5 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 787.7 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), with |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 799.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 800.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 43 {I13} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 24 {I7} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 357.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 358.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 11.7 {I44} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 31.1 {I67} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 863.7 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 863.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 100 {I13} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) and ({+16}O,6n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 352.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 351.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 845.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 845.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 767.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 767.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 459.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 459.4 from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 542.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 541.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), and ce data in ({+36}S,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.4 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 932.5 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1028.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1028.3 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1066.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1065.9 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 455.5 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 456 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 11.3 {I36} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 5.9 {I20} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 519.7 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 519.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g) and ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 364 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g), 364.6 from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 364.4 from ({+40}Ar,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Others: 100 {I16} from ({+36}S,4n|g) and 100 {I13} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 906.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 905.7 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g). Others: 907.1 from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 906.0 from ({+40}Ar,4n|g), 906.3 from ({+36}S,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Other: 73 {I13} from ({+36}S,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 441.7 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 441.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 574.7 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 574.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 857.7 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 858.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I28} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |DJ=(0) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 526.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 526.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 372.5 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$inferred from |g|g-coin in ({+30}Si,4n|g) (2009Ku03) and ({+16}O,6n|g) (2002Ka01), not observed directly 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 143.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 143.4 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I25} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 100 {I29} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 558.8 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 558.6 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 39 {I13} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 57 {I14} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 609.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 609.3 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce data in ({+16}O,6n|g) and ({+36}S,4n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 892.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 892.7 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 137.0 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 136.6 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g). This |g is placed from the 4643 level by 2002Ka01 in ({+16}O,6n|g) and here replaced by evaluators based on that of 2009Ku03 in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 596.6 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 597.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 613.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 613.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 130.2 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 130.1 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g). This |g is placed from 4506 level by 2002Ka01 in ({+16}O,6n|g) and replaced here by evaluators based on that of 2009Ku03 in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
RI$200 {I50} from ({+16}O,6n|g), but no intensity reported by 2009Ku03 in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 507.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 506.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I50} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1081.8 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1081.7 {I5} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$other: 166 {I66} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 283.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 284.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 326.2 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 326.3 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 590.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 591.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$other: I(591.2|g)/I(273.0|g)=100 {I15}/38 {I15} is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$this |g is placed from a 2646 level by 2002Ka01 in ({+16}O,6n|g), 1994Po08 in ({+36}S,4n|g) and 1993Me12 in ({+40}Ar,4n|g); it is placed from an unknown level by 1991Fa05 in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 659.2 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 659.5 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 162.6 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 162.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 47 {I3} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 78 {I22} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 29 {I7} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 753.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 753.3 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Others: 100 {I25} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 100 {I30} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 163.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 162.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 575.4 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 576 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 60 {I22} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 100 {I43} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 947.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I57} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 198.4 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 197 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I9} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1.2 {I8} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 514.7 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 514.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I12} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 361.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 361.2 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 714.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 714.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g), but |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) gives (D) with |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 119.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 119.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 415.8 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 416.2 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 133 {I67} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 630.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 632.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I33} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 232.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 303.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 303.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 145.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 144.7 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 461.6 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 461.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 375.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 376 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 43 {I11} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 95 {I25} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 727.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 727.5 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 100 {I22} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g), but |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) gives (D) with |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 288.1 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 287.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I24} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 614.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 614.7 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 29 {I12} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 197.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 196.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 459.7 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 459.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I11} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), and 23 {I8} from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 95 {I27} from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) is discrepant 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Others: 848.0 {I3} ({+30}Si,4n|g), 849.1 from ({+48}Ca,4n|g), 848.7 from ({+40}A{-4},4n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Others: 100 {I19} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 100 {I13} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and {+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 754.9 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 755.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 396.8 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 396.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I22} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 260.2 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 260.1 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1028.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1028.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce data in ({+36}S,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) and ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 347.6 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 347.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I19} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 635.7 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 636.0 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 3.5 {I18} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 13 {I6} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 581.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 581.1 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 676.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 677.4 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1241.3 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1241.5 {I5} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 498.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 498.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 376.3 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 376.4 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I33} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 773.1 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 773.5 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 19 {I6} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 17 {I8} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 336.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 336.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 374.2 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 374.3 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I30} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 721.8 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 722.2 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 29 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 20 {I10} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 653.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 654.1 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1007.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 1007.0 {I5} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.3 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 195.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 363 {I1} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 100 {I18} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 739.7 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 739.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 19 {I6} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 18 {I5} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 819.6 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 819.9 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 12 {I4} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 21 {I5} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 824.4 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 409.3 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 409.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), but |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) gives (Q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 376.0 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 375.5 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I40} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 712.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 711.7 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 17 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 12 {I6} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 208.5 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 208.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 396.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 396.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I33} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 771.0 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 771.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 24 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 33 {I17} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 255.9 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 255.7 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 4.6 {I18} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 8 {I4} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 260.7 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 260.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 100 {I22} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 248.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 249.1 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and ({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 270.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 269.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 416.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g), 417.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I24} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 792.8 {I10} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 793.3 {I5} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 22 {I8} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 24 {I10} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 212.3 {I3} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 212.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 227.6 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 328.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 328.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g), but |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) gives (Q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 424.0 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 423.7 {I3} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+30}Si,4n|g). Other: 100 {I33} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 266.8 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 267.3 {I2} from ({+16}O,6n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 306.9 {I5} from ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,6n|g) and |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.6 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.09 {I2}. The uncertainties on |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp from 1987Va09 seem to be underestimated in view of 30% uncertainty on |g-ray intensity 
CC$|a(K)exp+1.33(|a(L)exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$1987Va09 quote |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I8}; however, in the ce spectrum shown by the authors, the K-conversion line is not evident. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$doublet. The other component assigned to the decay of the 115 s +125 s isomers. Total I|g=5.6 {I5} divided by 1987Va09, probably from |g|g data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce data (1987Va09). A comparison of |g and ce spectra shows the existence of an E0 transition, which is assigned as a ground transition by 1987Va09 also based on coincidence relation with Pb K x rays and not coincidence with 965|g. 
$I(|g+ce)=0.02, deduced from transition intensity balance at 931 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=6.7 {I3} (1987Va09) 
M$1987Va09 quote |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I8}; however, in the ce spectrum shown by the authors, the K-conversion line is not evident. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 280.2 {I3} with I|g=70 {I5} (1976Ch30) 
M$from adopted gammas. Absence in ce data consistent with low conversion coefficient expected for mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Tentative placement from 1996Lo12 
$|a(K)exp=0.12 {I2}. Uncertainty quoted by 1987Va09 is incorrect, it should be at least 50% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 166.3 {I2} (1987Va09) and 166.1 {I3} (1976Ch30) 
RI$other: 46 {I3} from 1976Ch30 is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.40 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 173.8 {I2} (1987Va09) and 174.0 {I3} (1976Ch30) 
RI$other: 28 {I2} from 1976Ch30 is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$doublet. The other component is assigned to the decay of the 95-s isomer. Intensity division for two placements (with 2913 and 1637 level) is shown in figure 9 of 1987Va09, probably done the basis of |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance at 2628.7 level. 
E$transition seen in ce data (ce(L1), ce(L2), ce(L3), ce(M) lines corresponding to 47.0 keV observed). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$It could correspond to 396.8|g from 8259 level or 395.0|g from 7182 level in 2009Ku03. 
$R(|q)=0.74 {I9}, 1.0 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$deduced by 2005Dr11 from total conversion coefficient obtained from delayed intensity balances (not given in 2005Dr11 explicitly) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 in 2009Ku03 
RI$uncertainty of 0.1 in Table I of 2009Ku03 is probably a misprint in view of uncertainties of other transitions of comparable intensities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.2 in Table I of 2009Ku03 is probably a misprint in view of uncertainties of other transitions of comparable intensities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 in 2009Ku03 
$Initial level=6198.5 in Table I of 2009Ku03 seems incorrect in view of placement shown in level scheme Fig. 2 of 2009Ku03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Other: 965.2 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$from I(|g+ce)=27 (2002Ka01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0059 {I10} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18 and 1986Va03. Other: 575.1 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$other: I(575|g/965|g)=95 {I5}/100 (1986Va03). 
TI$other: 27 {I1} (1986Pa18). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0161 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.0038 {I8} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Others: 280.1 {I1} (1986Va03), 280.1 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$other: I(280|g/965|g)=92 {I4}/100 (1986Va03). 
TI$other: 25.3 {I5} (1986Pa18). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Other: 595 {I1} (2002Ka01). 
TI$other: 1.7 {I4} (1986Pa18). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I4} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Others: 421.1 {I2} (1986Va03), 421.2 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$other: I(421|g/965|g)=81 {I5}/100 (1986Va03). 
TI$other: 25.0 {I3} (1986Pa18). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.030 {I3}, |a(L+...)exp=0.0112 {I20} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18 and 1986Va03. Other: 166.1 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$other: I(166|g/965|g)=47 {I3}/100 (1986Va03). 
TI$24.3 {I3} in 1986Pa18 discrepant with 9 in 2002Ka01 9.1 in 2009Ku03. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.270 {I30}, |a{-L12}exp=0.301 {I20}, |a(L3)exp=0.180 {I20} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Other: 302 {I1} (2002Ka01). 
TI$other: 1.8 {I4} (1986Pa18). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.23 {I7} (1986Pa18) gives E2+M1 with |d=1.0 {I5}, but the ce(K) line is very weak in this work. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Others: 173.6 {I1} (1986Va03), 173.7 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$other: I(174|g/965|g)=75 {I5}/100 (1986Va03). 
TI$24.1 {I3} in 1986Pa18 discrepant with 3.2 quoted in 2002Ka01 3.3 in 2009Ku03. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.040 {I27}, |a(L)exp<0.020 {I6} (1986Pa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Pa18. Others: 351.9 {I2} (1986Va03), 352 {I1} (2002Ka01). 
RI$other: I(352|g/965|g)=19 {I3}/100 (1986Va03). 
TI$other: 3.4 {I4} (1986Pa18). 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.025 (1986Pa18), 0.014 {I5} (1986Va03). 
$DCO=2.7 {I7}, gating on |DJ=1, 173.7|g (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.4 {I1} (1986Va03) and 932.7 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$from I(|g+ce)=43 and |a{-T}=0.0076 from BrIcc. Other: I(933|g)/I(965|g)=34 {I3}/100 (1986Va03). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0070 {I15} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce)=12 (2002Ka01) and |a{-T}=0.252 {I4} from BrIcc. 
$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I6}, POL=-0.38 {I8} (1998Ka59) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 905.6 {I1} (1986Va03) and 906.0 {I2} (2002Ka01). 
RI$from I(|g+ce)=15 (2002Ka01) and |a{-T}=0.008 from BrIcc. Other: I(906|g)/I(965|g)=15 {I4}/100. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0058 {I20} (1986Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$also from 1986Va03. 
RI$other: I(442|g/965|g)=19 {I4}/100 (1986Va03). 
$|a(K)exp=0.009 {I2} (1998Ka59), |a(K)exp=0.012 {I6} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$416.2|g and 632.1|g placed by 2002Ka01 from two separate levels with close energies; they are placed from the same level by 2009Ku03 in ({+30}Si,4n|g), and in the Adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Ko08 
RI$weighted average of 78 {I9} (1996Br07), 82 {I4} (1993Ha20), 82 {I7} (1993Ko08), and 70 {I4} (1995Ga10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1996Br07. 
RI$unweighted average of 24 {I4} (1996Br07), 16 {I3} (1993Ha20), and 12 {I2} (1995Ga10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 575.4 (1990Br10), 574.2 (1993Ko08) 
RI$weighted average of 77 {I6} (1996Br07), 83 {I5} (1993Ha20), 88 {I6} (1993Ko08), and 75 {I7} (1995Ga10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.34 {I4} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 279.7 (1993Ko08) 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I10} (1996Br07), 54 {I4} (1993Ha20), 54 {I8} (1993Ko08), and 42 {I7} (1995Ga10) 
$R(asymmetry)=0.71 {I2} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 595.2 (1993Ko08) 
RI$weighted average of 21 {I6} (1996Br07), 32 {I5} (1993Ha20), 28 {I4} (1993Ko08), and 32 {I4} (1995Ga10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.30 {I8} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1990Br10. Others: 419.6 (1993Ko08), 421 (1997Ha24) 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I6} (1996Br07), 18 {I5} (1993Ha20), and 18 {I5} (1995Ga10). Other: 47 {I8} (1993Ko08) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 302.7 (1993Ko08). 
RI$weighted average of 8 {I3} (1996Br07), 17 {I3} (1993Ha20), and 15 {I3} (1993Ko08). Other: 5 {I2} (1995Ga10) is discrepant 
$R(asymmetry)=1.33 {I12} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: E|g=2348, I|g=1.6 {I3}) (1996Lo12,1997Ha44), placed from the 5047,8+ level of SD-1 band 
$R(asymmetry)=0.8 {I1} (1997Ha24) gives |DJ=1, D or |DJ=0, Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=2579, I|g=1.3 {I3} (1996Lo12,1997Ha44) 
$R(asymmetry)=0.7 {I1} (1997Ha24) gives |DJ=1, D or |DJ=0, Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 2636 (1996Lo12,1997Ha44) 
RI$weighted average of 1.8 {I6} (1997Ha24) and 2.0 {I4} (1996Lo12) 
$R(asymmetry)=0.8 {I2} (1997Ha24) gives |DJ=1, D or |DJ=0, Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$others: 2746 {I2} (1996Br07), 2742 (1996Lo12,1997Ha44) 
RI$weighted average of 3.3 {I6} (1997Ha24) and 2.5 {I4} (1996Lo12). Other: 2746|g carrying 6% {I2} of the full SD band intensity (1996Br07) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.1 {I2} (1997Ha24) 
$2746|g was shown (by 1996Br07) to deexcite (8+) level at 4881 keV, thus defining 6+ SD member at 4711. 1996Lo12, instead, propose this transition to deexcite 6+ level. In a later report (1997Ha24, same group as 1996Br07) this level is deduced at 4878 in agreement with that from 1996Lo12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 169.6 {I2} (1995Ga10), 169.6 (1990Br10), 169.9 (1993Ko08), 168.9 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 56 {I4} (1997Ha24), 64 {I9} (1996Br07), 49 {I13} (Fig. 2 of 1990Hu10), and 57 {I5} (Fig. 1 of 1995Ga10). Other: 32 {I4} (1993Ko08) is discrepant 
$R(asymmetry)=1.48 {I8} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 2439 (1996Lo12,1997Ha44) 
RI$weighted average of 0.9 {I4} (1997Ha24) and 1.1 {I3}(1996Lo12) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.0 {I2} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 2806 (1996Lo12,1997Ha44) 
RI$from 1996Lo12. Other: 1.7 {I5} (1997Ha24) 
$R(asymmetry)=0.7 {I1} (1997Ha24) gives |DJ=1, D or |DJ=0, Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 213.5 {I1} (1995Ga10), 213.2 {I1} (1994Hu10), 213.1 (1990Br10), 213.5 (1993Ko08), 213.0 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 90 {I5} (1997Ha24), 85 {I6} (1996Br07), 73 {I5} (1993Ko08), 102 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 73 {I13} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.45 {I4} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 256.5 {I1} (1995Ga10), 256.3 {I1} (1994Hu10), 256.4 (1990Br10), 256.3 (1993Ko08), 255.9 (1990Hu10) 
TI$others: 100 {I3} (1996Br07), 100 {I6} (1993Ko08), 100 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 100 {I16} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.40 {I5} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 298.4 {I1} (1994Hu10), 298.7 {I1} (1995Ga10), 298.8 (1990Br10), 298.3 (1993Ko08), 298.1 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 94 {I4} (1997Ha24), 88 {I6} (1993Ko08), 110 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 110 {I19} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.47 {I5} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 340.1 {I1} (1995Ga10), 339.5 {I1} (1994Hu10), 339.7 (1990Br10), 339.7 (1993Ko08), 339.6 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 92 {I4} (1997Ha24), 88 {I6} (1993Ko08), 93 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 99 {I13} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.40 {I5} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 380.4 {I1} (1995Ga10), 379.9 {I1} (1994Hu10), 380.0 (1990Br10), 379.9 (1993Ko08), 379.9 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 91 {I4} (1997Ha24), 88 {I6} (1993Ko08), 94 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 100 {I13} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 
$R(asymmetry)=1.42 {I5} (1997Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1995Ga10. Others: 418.6 {I2} (1994Hu10), 419.1 (1990Br10), 419.6 (1993Ko08), 419.4 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 88 {I6} (1993Ko08), 95 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 88 {I13} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1994Hu10. Others: 458.4 {I1} (1995Ga10), 458.4 (1990Br10), 457.6 (1993Ko08), 457.7 (1990Hu10) 
TI$unweighted average of 110 {I8} (1993Ko08), 85 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 61 {I13} (Fig. 2 of 1990Hu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1995Ga10. Others: 494.9 {I1} (1994Hu10), 495.6 (1990Br10), 495.0 (1993Ko08), 495.6 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 70 {I5} (1993Ko08), 83 {I10} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10), 59 {I13} (Fig. 2 of 1990Hu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1995Ga10. Others: 531.6 {I2} (1994Hu10), 531.9 (1990Br10), 532.5 (1990Hu10) 
TI$read off from Fig. 1 of 1995Ga10. Other: 67 {I13} (Fig. 2 of 1990Hu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1995Ga10. Others: 568.4 {I2} (1994Hu10), 567.9 (1990Br10), 568.5 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 52 {I5} (Fig. 1 of 1995Ga10) and 56 {I13} (Fig. 2 of 1990Hu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1995Ga10. Others: 602.5 {I1} (1994Hu10), 603.3 (1990Br10), 603.2 (1990Hu10) 
TI$weighted average of 42 {I5} (Fig.1 of 1995Ga10) and 49 {I13} (Fig.2 of 1990Hu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$this value seems low in comparison to the general pattern of intensities of |g rays in a typical SD band. The peak intensity shown in figure 1b (1994Hu10) also suggests a larger intensity for this |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)(5.1|g)/I(|g+ce)(586.5|g)=(41 {I5})/(59 {I5}) and I(|g+ce)(586.5 |g)=39.6 {I4} deduced from authors' values of B(E3), |d, |a, and T{-1/2}=10.0 |ms {I7} 


