# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$138.892 {I7} (1972Pr04), 138.97 {I4} (1970Be06), 138.947 {I8} (1971Lu08), 138.932 {I10} (2012Kr05). 
RI$Weighted ave. of 99.1 {I19} (2012Kr05), 108 {I5} (1972Pr04), 100 {I6} (1970Be06), 95.7 {I21} (2002Ma18). 
M from L subshell ratios: L1:L2:L3=100.0 {I21}: 23.9 {I11}: 8.5 {I4} (1972Pr04), also 100 {I4}: 24.3 {I25}: 10.4 {I13} (1969Co08). |a(L)exp=0.401 {I20} (1972Pr04), |a(L)exp=0.38 {I3} (1970Be06), |a(L)exp=0.42 {I4} (1969Co08). 
MR Weighted ave. of 0.353 {I21} (1969Co08) and 0.316 {I15} (1970Be06, 1972Pr04). '-' sign from 1973Kr05 (|q,H,t). Also listed in 1984Gh01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E From E(ce) measurements (1970Be06). 
RI I|g<0.01 estimated from ce(L1)<0.003 (1970Be06) 
TI Deduced from |g|g measurements; |g not seen by 1972Pr04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$106.993 {I10} (1972Pr04), 107.10 {I4} (1970Be06), 107.16 {I8} (1971Lu08), 107.019 {I10} (2012Kr05). 
RI$Weighted ave. of 14.6 {I3} (2012Kr05), 16.1 {I8} (1972Pr04), 12.8 {I7} (1970Be06). 
MR$Weighted average of 0.16 {I1} (1984Gh01) and 0.171 {I13} (2008ZaZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 180.03 {I3} (1972Pr04), 180.15 {I6} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 4.6 {I5} (1972Pr04), 4.5 {I5} (1970Be06) 
M |a(K)exp=1.00 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.14 {I3}, L1:L2:L3=100 {I15}: 28 {I9}: 15 {I15} (1972Pr04). 
MR Other: 0.63 {I9} from conversion electrom data. See |d footnote. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 219.13 {I5} (1972Pr04), 219.18 {I8} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 7.0 {I5} (1972Pr04), 6.6 {I6} (1970Be06) 
M |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3}, K/L=1.5 {I4}, L1:L2:L3=<44: 100 {I19}: 63 {I11} (1972Pr04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 357.7 {I2} (1972Pr04), 357.8 {I3} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.25 {I8} (1972Pr04), 0.30 {I18} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 181.81 {I3} (1972Pr04), 181.89 {I6} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 4.9 {I5} (1972Pr04), 4.7 {I5} (1970Be06) 
M |a(K)exp=0.92 {I11}, K/L=6.9 {I14}, L1:L2:L3=100 {I15}: 21 {I10}: 15 {I9} (1972Pr04). 
MR |d=0.49 {I7} from conversion electron data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 288.79 {I5} (1972Pr04), 288.98 {I15} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 3.6 {I3} (1972Pr04), 4.0 {I3} (1970Be06) 
M |a(K)exp=0.087 {I15} (1972Pr04), 0.077 {I19} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 361.79 {I5} (1972Pr04), 361.92 {I12} (1970Be06) 
RI$others: 7.5 {I6} (1972Pr04), 6.4 {I4} (1970Be06) 
M |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3} (1972Pr04), 0.17 {I3} (1970Be06). 
MR$Weighted average of -0.314 {I27} (2008ZaZY), -0.33 {I3} (1984Gh01), and -0.26 {I7} (1985Be03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 280.482 {I10} (2012Kr05), 280.43 {I3} (1972Pr04) 280.50 {I8} (1970Be06), and 280.457 {I35} (1971Lu08). 
RI$From 2002Ma18. Others: 31.9 {I3} (2012Kr05), 31.5 {I16} (1972Pr04), 33.0 {I17} (1970Be06). 
M |a(K)exp=0.35 {I3}, K/L=5.7 {I3}, L1:L2:L3=100 {I5}: 18: 4: <5 (1972Pr04); |a(K)exp=0.27 {I3}, K/L=5.6 {I7} (1970Be06); 
MR$0.18 {I11} from conversion electron data. See |d footnote. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 2012Kr05. Others: 321.56 {I3} (1972Pr04), 321.63 {I10} (1970Be06), 321.627 {I35} (1971Lu08). 
RI$Weighted ave. of 31.9 {I3} (2012Kr05), 32.3 {I16} (1972Pr04), 35.0 {I20} (1970Be06), 32.2 {I2} (2002Ma18). 
M |a(K)exp=0.244 {I18}, K/L=6.1 {I9}, L1:L2:L3=100 {I11}: 18 {I8}: 14 {I14} (1972Pr04); |a(K)exp=0.182 {I21}, K/L=6.4 {I9} (1970Be06). 
MR Other: +0.236 {I16} (2008ZaZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From (2012Kr05). Others: 387.46 {I4} (1972Pr04), 387.48 {I12} (1970Be06), 387.509 {I58} (1971Lu08). 
RI$Weighted ave. of 31.3 {I3} (2012Kr05), 31.9 {I16} (1972Pr04), 29.0 {I20} (1970Be06), 31.8 {I2} (2002Ma18). 
M |a(K)exp=0.138 {I10}, K/L=6.3 {I9}, L1:L2:L3=100 {I15}: 23 {I10}: <11 (1972Pr04); |a(K)exp=0.131 {I17}, K/L=5.6 {I10} (1970Be06). 
MR |d=0.25 {I10} from conversion electron data. See |d footnote. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 460.547 {I10} (2012Kr05), 460.49 {I3} (1972Pr04) 460.56 {I12} (1970Be06), and 460.501 {I65} (1971Lu08). 
RI$From 2002Ma18. Others: 100 {I1} (2012Kr05), 100 {I5} (1972Pr04), 100 {I6} (1970Be06). 
MR$Others: -0.49 {I2} (1985Be03) and -0.634 {I17} (2008ZaZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 377.31 {I7} (1972Pr04), 377.60 {I20} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 1.8 {I2} (1972Pr04), 1.7 {I2} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 418.35 {I8} (1972Pr04), 418.16 {I20} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 1.38 {I14} (1972Pr04), 1.6 {I2} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 484.25 {I5} (1972Pr04) and 484.22 {I15} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 4.3 {I3} (1972Pr04), 4.8 {I5} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 557.36 {I8} (1972Pr04) and 557.41 {I15} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 33 {I3} (1972Pr04), 39.1 {I50} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 379.04 {I15} (1972Pr04), 379.0 {I5} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.35 {I9} (1972Pr04), 0.20 {I8} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 420.30 {I5} (1972Pr04), 420.07 {I20} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 4.2 {I3} (1972Pr04), 3.7 {I4} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 559.26 {I8} (1972Pr04), 559.22 {I15} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 12.3 {I12} (1972Pr04), 15.5 {I20} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 298.83 {I5} (1972Pr04), 298.71 {I15} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 4.7 {I4} (1972Pr04), 4.8 {I3} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 524.98 {I8} (1972Pr04), 525.3 {I2} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.40 {I4} (1972Pr04), 0.40 {I6} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 598.438 {I78} (2012Kr05). 598.1 {I3} (1972Pr04), 598.6 {I4} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.017 {I8} (1972Pr04), 0.02 {I1} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI I|g deduced from coincidence experiment does not agree with the relative branching measured in {+191}Ir(nn,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 234.58 {I6} (1972Pr04), 234.60 {I12} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 1.30 {I17} (1972Pr04), 1.2 {I1} (1970Be06) 
MR$Weighted average of -0.20 {I13} (nuclear orientation - 1973Kr05) and -0.41 {I7} (2007ZaZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$From 2012Kr05. Others: 333.3 {I3} (1972Pr04), 333.0 {I3} (1970Be06). 
RI$Weighted ave. of 0.067 {I5} (2012Kr05), 0.07 {I4} (1972Pr04), 0.04 {I2} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 514.95 {I10} (1972Pr04), 515.2 {I2} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.28 {I5} (1972Pr04), 0.40 {I6} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 695.12 {I10} (1972Pr04), 695.3 {I2} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.072 {I14} (1972Pr04), 0.09 {I2} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 154.808 {I10} (2012Kr05), 154.74 {I3} (1972Pr04), 154.68 {I10} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.76 {I11} (1972Pr04), 0.63 {I7} (1970Be06). 
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.8 {I3} (1972Pr04). |d=1.3 {I6} from |a(K)exp datum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 251.62 {I4} (1972Pr04), 251.66 {I8} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 5.5 {I4} (1972Pr04), 5.4 {I4} (1970Be06). 
MR$Unweighted average of -0.132 {I7} (2008ZaZY) and -0.079 {I20} (1984Gh01) other: |d=0.45 {I14} from conversion electron data, see |d footnote. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 2012Kr05. Others: 350.2 {I2} (1972Pr04), 350.2 {I3} (1970Be06). 
RI$Weighted ave. of 0.138 {I4} (2012Kr05), 0.18 {I6} (1972Pr04), 0.16 {I5} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 532.02 {I5} (1972Pr04), 532.3 {I2} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 2.10 {I15} (1972Pr04), 2.2 {I2} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 573.33 {I10} (1972Pr04), 573.4 {I2} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.49 {I5} (1972Pr04), 0.54 {I6} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 639.09 {I10} (1972Pr04), 639.3 {I2} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.19 {I3} (1972Pr04), 0.21 {I3} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 712.10 {I10} (1972Pr04), 712.1 {I2} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.39 {I6} (1972Pr04), 0.50 {I5} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 142.130 {I8} (1972Pr04), 142.26 {I6} (1970Be06), 142.139 {I10} (2012Kr05). 
RI$Others: 1.9 {I2} (1972Pr04), 1.4 {I2} (1970Be06). 
M |a(K)exp=1.5 {I3} (1972Pr04), |a(K)exp=2.0 {I4} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: 181 (1972Pr04) seen in coincidence spectra only with I|g=0.008 at the limit of detection. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 440.986 {I19} (2012Kr05), 440.95 {I5} (1972Pr04), and 440.90 {I20} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 2.32 {I16} (1972Pr04), 2.2 {I2} (1970Be06). 
M |a(K)exp=0.085 {I17} (1972Pr04), |a(K)exp=0.09 {I3} (1970Be06) 
MR$From 1973Kr05. Other: |d=0.19 {I4} and 0.32 {I10} from listed |a(K)exp values, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Using the Limitation of relative statistical weight method of 668.147 {I55} (2012Kr05), 668.09 {I9} (2005Za15), 668.3 {I3} (1972Pr04), and 667.0 {I4} (1970Be06). 
RI$Using the Limitation of relative statistical Weight method of 0.026 1 (2012Kr05), 0.016 {I2} (2005Za15), 0.019 {I9} (1972Pr04), and 0.03 {I1} (1970Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 709.904 {I27} (2012Kr05), 709.93 {I15} (1972Pr04), 710.0 {I4} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.052 {I13} (1972Pr04), 0.04 {I2} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 848.85 {I15} (1972Pr04), 848.9 {I4} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.11 {I2} (1972Pr04), 0.12 {I2} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 413.729 {I16} (2012Kr05), 413.8 {I2} (1972Pr04), and 414.0 {I3} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.12 {I4} (1972Pr04), 0.11 {I3} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 735.3 {I3} (1972Pr04), 735.5 {I4} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.027 {I7} (1972Pr04), 0.030 {I6} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 2012Kr05. Others: 874.36 {I15} (1972Pr04), 874.2 {I3} (1970Be06) 
RI$Weighted ave. of 0.46 {I3} (2012Kr05), 0.48 {I7} (1972Pr04), 0.58 {I6} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 784.447 {I56} (2012Kr05), 784.2 {I2} (1972Pr04), and 784.2 {I4} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.017 {I4} (1972Pr04), 0.02 {I1} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 891.26 {I15} (1972Pr04), 891.0 {I4} (1970Be06) 
RI$Others: 0.072 {I11} (1972Pr04), 0.080 {I12} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Using the Limitation of relative statistical Weight method of 778.513 {I14} (2012Kr05), 778.48 {I15} (1972Pr04), and 777.4 {I4} (1970Be06). 
RI$Others: 0.042 {I9} (1972Pr04), 0.06 {I2} (1970Be06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$other values: E|g=80.19 {I5} (1957Bo12), E|g=80.27 {I4} (1970Ba56). Other: 1966Sy01. 
M$from L1:L2:L3 (exp)=54.5 {I3}:10.9 {I2}:225 {I1} 
Also: |a(K)exp=103.0 {I8} (from I(K| x ray)/I|g assuming |w(K)=0.958 {I4} given by 1996Sc06) (2004Ni14). Other: |a(K)exp=104 {I3} (I(K| x ray)/I|g) (1987Li16); |a(K)exp=92.6 {I9} (I(K| x ray)/I|g) (1988Zh11). K:L:M:N:(O+P)(exp)= 2.08 {I4}:290.4 {I6}:101.4 {I6}:26.6 {I3}:3.8 {I1} (Ice(K) deduced from I(K| x ray) (Ir fluorescence yield =0.95)); (O+P)/N3(exp)=0.228 {I2} (1975Ma32). Other ce data: 1970Ba56, 1969Bi01, 1957Bo12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E rounded-off value from Adopted Gammas. 
E|g(ordinary atom) - E|g(muonic atom)=-0.27 {I5} (1974Ba77); |g observed by 1977Li20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from relative intensities of emission lines from completely magnetized {+193}Os source (1967Wa20) (sign convention not stated by authors, but sign apparently consistent with later data (1984Gh01)); |d=0.61 {I5} (1967At03). Other: 1968At01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from adopted gammas I|g(154|g)/I|g(336|g)=0.40 {I13} which would indicate that all the observed intensity belongs to this location in level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI from branching ratio in adopted gammas; |g possibly masked by impurity (477|g of {+7}Li) (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Peak superimposed on impurity ({+7}Li, 477|g); I|g calculated from relative branching in Coulomb excitation (1987Pr10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g not resolved from impurity (517|g in {+34}Cl) contaminant; I|g deduced from relative branching in {+193}Os |b{+-} decay (1987Pr10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
|g not observed but expected from {+193}Os |b{+-} decay and {+192}Ir(n,|g) data. I|g calculated from relative branching from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
|g not seen, but expected on the basis of {+193}Os |b{+-} and {+192}Ir(n,|g) data. I|g deduced from relative branching in adopted levels (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1969Av03 
Masked by x-rays (1972Pr04); observation confirmed from analysis of x-ray spectrum (1969Av03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR 2000Be07 ( particle-|g(|q) ). Others: -0.44 {I+2-4} (1970Av02); -0.75 {I25} (1958Mc02); 0.329 {I12} (|b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g(218.8|g)/I|g(357.7|g)=0.63 {I4} (1972Pr04) 
RI 219|g is also placed from the 7/2- 299.4 keV level by 1987Mc01; however, all I|g is shown here. 
M,MR 2000Be07 ( particle-|g(|q) ). Others: -0.34 {I4} ( |g(|q), 1984Mu19); -0.22 {I3} (1958Mc02); -0.42 {I+8-14} (1970Av02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$R{-ADO}=1.13 {I13} 
M$2011Fa07 note the R{-ADO} value is consistent with non-stretched, |DJ=0, transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.020 keV from 0.003 in the fitting procedure. 
$Intensity divided equally in two placements in 2008Ba25 without specifying a supporting argument. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$others: 43.1 {I3} (1966Wi06), 42.8 {I2} (1964Wi07), and 43.0 {I4} (1965Jo10) 
M$|a(L)exp=12.1 from I|g(43|g)/I(L| x ray) (1978In01), |a(L)exp=9.6 {I15} (1964Wi07), 9.2 {I9} (1965Jo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Adopted Gammas, not observed in decay measurements in this dataset, with intensity deduced from |g-branching ratios in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$others: 82.3 {I10} (1964Wi07), 82 {I1} (1966Wi06), 78 {I3} (1965Jo10) 
RI$from 1978In01. 1964Wi07 give I|g=0.183 {I11} and 1965Jo10 give 0.32 {I8} for a 78|g. No Ir K| x ray observed by 1978In01 that is also consistent with the non-observation of 82.3|g. It should be noted that 1978In01 incorrectly quote this limit as 0.002 in two places in the paper while it is correctly given as 0.2 in two other places. An examination of the spectrum shown by the authors clearly reveals the discrepant values 
M$M1 from ce data: I(K| x ray)/I|g 1964Wi07 deduce |a(K)exp=9.4 {I5}; |a(K)exp=5.6 {I12} from 1965Jo10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce) intensity balance, with deduced I|g values of 39.2|g and 41.1|g, and theoretical conversion coefficients from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(41.1|g)/I(84.2|g)=0.8/198.0 in 2008Ba25 in (n,|g) E=th and I|g(84.2)=55 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 83.5 {I5} (1968He11) and 84.3 {I20} (1968Lu01) 
RI$from I|g(84.3|g + 82.3|g)=60 {I6}, average of 63 {I6} (1968He11) and 58 {I6} (1968Lu01), and deduced I|g(82.3|g)=5.0 {I5} 
$L1/L2|<1.4 (1969PrZU). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$others: 111.0 {I5} (1968He11), 112.4 {I20} (1968Lu01) 
RI$from 1968He11, 1968Lu01. 
MR$other: 1.2 {I1} from L1/L3=0.57 {I10}, L2/L3=1.19 {I9} (1969PrZU). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce) intensity balance at 112 level, known I|g values of 27.9|g, 29.9|g and 112.2|g, and theoretical conversion coefficients from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce) intensity balance at 84 level, deduced I|g values of 27.9|g, 41.1|g and 84.3|g, and theoretical conversion coefficients from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2, |d=0.025 {I2} from ce data; M1(+E2) in Table VI of 2008Ba25; E2 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I2}:10.3 {I3}:2.17 {I10}:22.9 {I7}:2.48 {I7}: 0.27 {I2}:5.54 {I16}:0.68 {I3}. 
$Ice(L1)=321 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2, |d=0.012 {I2} from ce data; M1(+E2) in Table VI of 2008Ba25; E2 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I2}:8.5 {I3}:1.20 {I4}:24.0 {I13}:4.6 {I5}:0.20 {I4}:5.02 {I14}. 
$Ice(L1)=97 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce spectrum; not reported in |g-ray data. 
RI$from 2008Ba25. 
$Ice(L3)=21.5 {I17}. 
$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2+N3=1.15 {I17}:66.4 {I2}:100 {I2}:20.9 {I8}:25.8 {I7}:14.4 {I16} 15.4 {I4}:8.3 {I2}:4.7 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1)=53 {I3}. 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I2}:69 {I3}:58 {I3}:23.3 {I10}:18.5 {I8}: 16.3 {I7}:6.0 {I2}:9.9 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I4}:14.3 {I7}:14.6 {I8}:17.8 {I10}:1.7 {I3}:6.52 {I10}. 
$Ice(M1)=1.66 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=38.9 {I25}:100 {I2}:16.1 {I5}:10.2 {I6}:18.8 {I6}:4.5 {I8}. 
$Ice(L1)=23.0 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I2}:24.8 {I8}:66.1 {I19}:52.4 {I17}:8.2 {I4}: 17.9 {I5}:14.8 {I4}:1.42 {I17}:8.23 {I23}. 
$Ice(K)=113 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I2}:20.5 {I9}:7.2 {I4}:25.0 {I13}:2.5 {I2}: 0.25 {I5}:7.9 {I7}:1.9 {I3}. 
$Ice(L1)=28.0 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2, |d=0.18 {I1} from ce data; M1(+E2) in Table VI of 2008Ba25; E2 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I2}:21.3 {I7}:2.88 {I13}:0.64 {I13}:5.0 {I2}: 0.93 {I8}:0.75 {I13}:1.26 {I5}. 
$Ice(K)=179 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=37.2 {I22}. 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3::100 {I6}:17.2 {I11}:32.4 {I20}:23.9 {I15}:5.2 {I4}: 9.1 {I7}:5.7 {I5}:1.4 {I2}:3.9 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.030 keV from 0.003 in the fitting procedure. 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=61.256. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$from ce spectrum; not reported in |g-ray data. 
RI$from 2008Ba25. 
$Ice(L1)=64 {I5}. 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I2}:5.9 {I2}:58.2 {I16}:31.1 {I11}:2.41 {I13}: 15.4 {I4}:8.3 {I2}:4.7 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2+N3=100 {I2}:9.6 {I3}:35.8 {I12}:25.8 {I8}:2.8 {I3}: 11.9 {I3}:6.7 {I3}:3.5 {I4}. 
$Ice(L1)=98 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ce spectrum; not reported in |g-ray data. 
RI$from 2008Ba25. 
$Ice(L1)=20.7 {I21}. 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1=100 {I5}:7.8 {I12}:0.82 {I12}:19.4 {I14}:5.6 {I6}:6.7 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N2+N3=100 {I7}:13.9 {I12}:82 {I6}:62 {I5}:4.4 {I5}:22.7 {I16}: 18.8 {I14}:11.6 {I15}. 
$Ice(K)=25.7 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.042 keV from 0.014 in the fitting procedure. 
$Ice(M1)=20 {I3}. M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I3}:10.3 {I6}:1.5 {I2}:14.6 {I4}. 
E$level-energy difference=22.310. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2, |d=0.16 {I2} from ce data; M1(+E2) in Table VI of 2008Ba25; E2 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=65 {I3}; L1 also observed. 
$K:L1:L2:M1:N1=100 {I5}:20.0 {I11}:2.5 {I2}:4.0 {I3}:1.43 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I15}:19 {I3}:5.4 {I10}:2.5 {I5}:4.6 {I8}:2.5 {I6}:1.3 {I3}: 1.25 {I24}. 
$Ice(K)=12.2 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I2}:39.7 {I19}:28.9 {I11}:23.9 {I9}:13.4 {I9}:7.3 {I7}:4.2 {I10}. 
$Ice(L1)=5.8 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N2+N3=100 {I6}:20.0 {I13}:77 {I5}:51 {I4}:5.1 {I6}:17.6 {I12}: 12 {I3}:3.9 {I9}. 
$Ice(K)=7.4 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N2+N3=100 {I7}:26 {I3}:82 {I9}:58 {I4}:12.8 {I18}:21.7 {I25}: 17 {I3}:7.2 {I14}. 
$Ice(K)=6.7 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2+N3::100 {I10}:11 {I3}:61 {I7}:40 {I5}:9.9 {I21}:6.7 {I11}:5.9 {I13}. 
$Ice(K)=1.62 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2+N3=100 {I6}:20.4 {I13}:55 {I4}:45 {I3}:13.6 {I10}:10.8 {I14}:4.8 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=6.4 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2+N3=100 {I9}:14.4 {I16}:20.7 {I21}:17.9 {I21}:9.7 {I12}:6.0 {I11}: 1.8 {I3}. 
$Ice(K)=9.6 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp, and also in Table VI of 2008Ba25; E2 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=3.98 {I24}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N2+N3=64 {I3}:11.0 {I5}:100 {I2}:97 {I6}:10.4 {I24}: 27 {I3}:26.2 {I19}:14 {I3}. 
$Ice(K)=2.29 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) from ce data and also in Table VI of 2008Ba25; E2 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=6.1 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$E2+M1 from ce data; E2(+M1) in Table VI of 2008Ba25; M1 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=2.00 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.020 keV from 0.005 in the fitting procedure. 
E$level-energy difference=198.117. 
$Ice(K)=1.46 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.020 keV from 0.003 in the fitting procedure. 
RI$total intensity=33.8 {I8}. Intensity divided in two equal parts for two placements (2008Ba25). Basis of this division of intensity is not specified by the authors. Perhaps it is from |g|g-coin data. 
M$M1+E2 in Table VI of 2008Ba25, but M1 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=7.4 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp also gives E1+M2 with |d=0.39 {I8}, but |DJ|p requires M1+E2 for placement from 377 level and E2 for placement from 436 level. 
$Ice(K)=0.23 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$E2+M1 from |a(K)exp; E2(+M1) in Table VI of 2008Ba25; M1 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=0.77 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.010 keV from 0.003 in the fitting procedure. 
E$level-energy difference=262.729. 
$Ice(K)=1.07 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$E2+M1 from ce data, and in 2008Ba25; M1 is inconsistent with |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=0.25 {I5}. 
M$E2 or M1+E2 (1998Ba85). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives M1 with |a=0.107; |DJ|p requires M1+E2 for placement from 436 level and E1 for placement from 518.6 level. M1 given in 2008Ba25. 
$Ice(K)=0.243 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
$Placement is questionable due to mult=E3 implied by |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=0.41 {I4}. 
M$|a(K)exp gives M1+E2, but |DJ|p requires E3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.028 keV from 0.007 in the fitting procedure. 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=124.811. 
$Ice(K)=1.94 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.015 keV from 0.005 in the fitting procedure. 
E$level-energy difference=181.053. 
$Ice(K)=0.27 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)<0.10. 
M$|a(K)exp gives (E1), as also in Table VI of 2008Ba25, but |DJ|p requires M1+E2 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|DJ|p suggests E1, but |a(K)exp gives M1+E2 for the doublet. 
$Ice(K)=0.33 {I9}. 
M$M1 or M1+E2 (1998Ba85); (M1+E2) listed in Table VI of 2008Ba25. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$M1 listed in Tables IV and VI of 2008Ba25, but E2 required by |DJ|p. 
E$605.66 {I6} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.106 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)<0.10. 
M$|a(K)exp gives E1, as also listed in Table VI of 2008Ba25. But |DJ|p requires M1+E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$520.16 {I3} (from ce data), 2008Ba25, in their Table VI, quote 520.567 with I|g=2.88 (or renormalized value of 7.2 {I5}) from the 669.4 level, while in their Table IV, quote two gamma rays of E|g=520.35 {I7} with I|g=2.0 {I6} and 520.57 {I6} with I|g=7.2 {I5} between the same levels at 669.4 and 148.9 keV. Level-energy difference of 520.44 {I1} favors placement of 520.35 gamma from this level. 
$Ice(K)=0.103 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 listed in Tables IV and VI of 2008Ba25, their |DJ|p implies E2. 
E$557.04 {I4} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.25 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)<0.05. 
M$E1 from |a(K)exp as also listed in Table VI of 2008Ba25, but |DJ|p requires M1+E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$531.38 {I4} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.229 {I18}. 
M$M1 from |a(K)exp as also listed in Tables IV and VI of 2008Ba25, but |DJ|p in 2008Ba25 requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$565.034 {I18} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.127 {I23}. 
M$M1 from |a(K)exp as listed in Tables IV and VI of 2008Ba25, but |DJ|p requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$596.00 {I7} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.046 {I17}. 
M$from |a(K)exp for a doublet, as also listed in Tables IV and VI of 2008Ba25. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives M1 for the doublet, as also listed in Tables IV and VI of 2008Ba25, but |DJ|p requires [E1]. 
E$527.182 {I22} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.115 {I21}, contribution from other lines subtracted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=2.3 {I3}. 
M$|a(K)exp gives M1+E2, as listed in Table VI of 2008Ba25, but their |DJ|p requires M2, which, in the opinion of evaluators is also unlikely. E1 implied by presently assigned |DJ|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.37 {I9}. 
M$|a(K)exp gives M1, as listed in Table VI of 2008Ba25, but their |DJ|p implies M2, which, in the opinion of evaluators is also unlikely. E1 implied by presently assigned |DJ|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.11 {I3}. 
M$|a(K) exp gives M1+E2, as also listed in Table VI of 2008Ba25, but |DJ|p requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$576.77 {I3} (from ce data). 
$Ice(K)=0.38 {I3}. 
M$|a(K)exp is too high for either M1 or E2, almost agrees with pure M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$From 2005Ca02. 
RI$Arbitrary units. The values are efficiency-corrected counts, in the obtained |g-ray spectra with arbitrary overall normalization (2005Ca02). 
M$Hindrance factors suggest that if the 116 transition is directly depopulating an isomer, it is likely to have E1 multipolarity, which is supported by the lack of observed x-ray events by 2005Ca02. 
$2011St21 also report E|g=116.4 {I5}, on his intensity scale, I|g=100 {I17}. This |g-ray de-excites a 73 ns {I11} isomer, but the level scheme is unknown, so not placed in level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Placement from ({+60}Ni,2n|g), where |g|g coin rules out alternative placement within g.s. band tentatively suggested in (HI,xn|g) for a 725.9|g. 
M |D|p=yes from level scheme for D transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
R=1.14 {I6} (2006Jo04). 
I|g(157.6|')/I|g(79|' and 101|')=1.06 {I12} (1998Ki20). 
Other E|g: 510 keV (1997Ju04), 508 keV (1998Se20); 508.9 (I|g=100 {I5}) (1998Ki20); authors do not state the uncertainty in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
R=1.22 {I9} (2006Jo04). 
Other data: E|g=662.3, I|g=86 {I6}; I|g(157.6|')/I|g(79|' and 101|')=1.20 {I14} (1998Ki20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
R=1.46 {I14} for 384.0|g+384.4|g (2006Jo04). 
Other E|g (I|g): 385.0 (26 {I2}) for unplaced |g (1998Ki20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
R=1.03 {I14} (2006Jo04). 
Other data: E|g=739.5, I|g=49 {I7}; I|g(157.6|')/I|g(79|' and 101|')=0.88 {I17} (1998Ki20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 682.6 {I3} from ({+58}Ni,2n|g), 683.2 {I2} from ({+84}Sr,2p2n|g) and 683.7 {I1} from ({+60}Ni,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement of 374.1 {I3} |g feeding 2181 level in ({+84}Sr,2p2n|g) is not adopted. That |g probably belongs here, consistent with implied branching of 15 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 861.7 {I4} from ({+58}Ni,2n|g), 861.9 {I5} from ({+84}Sr,2p2n|g) and 862.1 {I10} from ({+60}Ni,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 241.5 {I2} from ({+58}Ni,2n|g), 241.7 {I2} from ({+84}Sr,2p2n|g) and 242.2 {I2} from ({+60}Ni,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI doublet in Sn({+60}Ni,xn|g); E|g is from ({+84}Sr,2p2n|g), I|g is weighted average from ({+58}Ni,2n|g) and ({+84}Sr,2p2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
The 4+ to 4+ placement shown in table ii of 2006Jo04 is a misprint; it should be 6+ to 4+. 
M R=1.40 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=26 {I+10-6} 
$B(E2)(4+ |) 2+)/B(E2)(2+ |) 0+)=0.55 {I19} (2018Ce02) 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(4+ |) 2+)/B(E2)(2+ |) 0+)=0.57 {I+38-23} using extreme limits of B(E2)(W.u.) values deduced by compiler. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E from {+180}Hg |a decay (1993Wa03). 
RI Not reported. 
E The limit of the 179|g transition is determined to be <2% of the 300 keV (4+ to 2+) transition with no evidence of such transition in {+176}Au |b{++}/|e decay (1999Da18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.58 {I8}, A{-4}=0.01 {I9} 
MR$|d=0.34 {I2} by assuming K=5/2. Others: |d=-0.35 {I+14-25} from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.58 {I8}, A{-4}=0.01 {I9} 
MR$|d=0.34 {I2} by assuming K=5/2. Other: |d=-0.35 {I+14-25} from |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
This transition proceeds only by electron conversion (1999Da18) (see also {+178}Au |e decay dataset below) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(M1)+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.01 {i9}, A{-4}=+0.27 {i11}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.11 {i1}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.010 {i2}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.0025 {i4}. Theory: |a{-K}=0.0225, |a{-L}=0.00581, |a{-M}=0.00141. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.14 {i13}, A{-4}=-0.20 {i17}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.06 {i4}, theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.0174, |a{-K}(E2)=0.00634 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}(exp)<0.09 (electron line contaminated by a strong K electron line from the 624 keV transition in {+178}Os) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M R=0.6 {i1}; A{-2}=-0.17 {i9}, A{-4}=+0.07 {i12} 
B(E1)=5.7 {i14} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,636.3)/B(E2,241.5)=9.2 {i20} 10{+-7} b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,241.5) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
B(E1)=0.24 {i7} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,1047.9)/B(E2,241.5)=0.38 {i11} 10{+-7}b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,241.5) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
B(E1)=3.5 {i8} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,940.4)/B(E2,308.8)=5.5 {i12} 10{+-7} b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,308.8) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
B(E1)=8.8 {i21} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,476.4)/B(E2,323.1)=13.6 {i29} 10{+-7} b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,323.1) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
B(E1)=1.4 {i6} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,834.6)/B(E2,377.1)=2.1 {i9} 10{+-7} b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,377.1) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from energies of cross-over |g cascade: 170.4+250.6 keV. 
M Strong electron transition without corresponding |g-ray, X(E0/E2)=0.010 {i4}. |a{-K}(exp)=1.0 {i2}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.18 {i5}. Theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.1015, |a{-L}(M1)=0.0164, and |a{-K}(E2)=0.0270, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00854. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(M1)+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.01 {i9}, A{-4}=+0.27 {i11}; unknown sign for |d. |a{-K}(exp)=0.11 {i1}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.010 {i2}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.0025 {i4}. Theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.0743, |a{-L}(M1)=0.0120, |a{-M}(M1)=0.00276, and |a{-K}(E2)=0.0199, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00555, |a{-M}(E2)=0.00137. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.14 {i13}, A{-4}=-0.20 {i17}. |a{-K}(exp)=0.06 {i4}. Theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.0174, |a{-K}(E2)=0.00634. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}(exp)<0.09 (electron line contaminated by a strong K electron line from the 624 keV transition in {+178}Os). Theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.0352, |a{-K}(E2)=0.0111. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M R=1.2 {i1}; A{-2}=+0.20 {i4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {i5} 
CC |a{-tot}(exp)=0.65 {i5} from the intensity balance at the 2+ level (2000Ko16). From theory: |a{-tot}(M1)=1.465, |a{-tot}(E2)=0.630, |a{-tot}(E1)=0.105. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)=1.16 {i10} e{+2}b{+2} (1986Dr05) 
Q{-t}=6.4 {i3} eb (1986Dr05). 
M R=1.2 {i1}; A{-2}=+0.12 {i4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {i5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.96 {i7} e{+2}b{+2} (1986Dr05) 
Q{-t}=5.5 {i2} eb (1986Dr05). 
M R=1.1 {i1}; A{-2}=+0.12 {i6}, A{-4}=+0.03 {i7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
B(E1)=5.7 {i14} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,636.3)/B(E2,241.5)=9.2 {i20} 10{+-7} b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,241.5) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 
M R=0.6 {i1}; A{-2}=-0.17 {i9}, A{-4}=+0.07 {i12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
2000Ko16 list this transition as (E2). This misprint is inconsistent with the J|p change between the initial and final states in their proposed level scheme. 
B(E1)=1.4 {i6} 10{+-5} W.u., deduced by 2000Ko16 from their experimental ratio B(E1,834.6)/B(E2,377.1)=2.1 {i9} 10{+-7} b{+-1}, and a calculated B(E2,377.1) assuming Q{-0}=6.4 {i3} eb from 1986Dr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by a strong 396.6 line from {+178}Hg 
M R=1.2 {i2}; A{-2}=+0.16 {i4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {i6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E uncertainty unstated by authors but probably ~1 keV, the same as for other E|g data from this study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$|g(t) for the 153.7|g yields T{-1/2}=7.1 s {I12} which implies this transition originates from an excited state populated in the |e decay of {+179}Au. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=256.4 {I3}, I|g=30 {I6} (1977Hu05). 
$|a(K)exp=0.116 {I24}. 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=0.10 {I4}, A{-44}/A{-0}=-0.017 {I24}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=324.0 {I3}, I|g=18 {I3}, from a 1183 (2+) level (1977Hu05). 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=0.45 {I6}, A{-44}/A{-0}=0.84 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=524.2 {I3}, I|g=44 {I7} (1977Hu05). 
$|a(K)exp=0.057 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.010 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.005 {I2}. 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=-0.02 {I4}, A{-44}/A{-0}=0.24 {I5}. 
MR$<-11 from |g|g(|q) (1999Da18). 
CC$from sum of |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, and |a(M)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=707.7 {I5}, I|g|?4 (1977Hu05). 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=0.21 {i10}, A{-44}/A{-0}=0.034 {i19}. 
$|a(K)exp=0.21 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.034 {I19}; unresolved from the 708.9|g 
CC$from |a(K)exp+|a(L)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=808.4 {I4}, I|g|?30 {I6} (1977Hu05). 
$|a(K)exp<0.012 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=-0.19 {i6}, A{-44}/A{-0}=-0.15 {i7}. 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp. E2 favored from level scheme. 
MR$<-13 from |g|g(|q) (1999Da18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp<0.009 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=0.31 {I18}, A{-44}/A{-0}=0.90 {I20}. 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp, E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0087 {I19}. 
$A{-22}/A{-0}=-0.09 {I9}, A{-44}/A{-0}=0.20 {I11}. 
$E|g=1032.1 {I7}, I|g=23 {I5} from a 1183 (2+) level (1977Hu05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M non-stretched Q from DCO in ({+40}Ar,3n|g); |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp favors E2 with possible M1 admixture assuming precision of datum has been significantly overestimated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition not observed; E|g from level energy difference. 
TI |<1980 from intensity balance at 79 level; |>1560 from intensity balance at 94 level if 23|g and 73|g are pure M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(L12)exp=1.15 {I15}; value exceeds both M1 theory (0.57) and E2 theory (0.83), but authors assign M1+E2. Based on the ce spectrum in fig 4a, the stated precision appears optimistic; the evaluator suspects a typographic error, and adopts E2(+M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp|?0.04; designated by authors as abnormal E1, possibly analogous to a 161|g in {+183}Pt connecting 9/2[624] and 7/2[514] levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition not observed; E|g from level energy difference. 
TI authors' estimate, based on intensity balance at 276 level, assuming no |e feeding to that level (none is expected since |DJ=(3)) and |a(159|g)|?1 (for anomalous E1 transition). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from ce data; doublet of 1309.2|g and 1309.6|g. The 1309.2|g is largely attributable to an E1 transition in {+181}Ir which has little impact on ce energy and intensity. 
M,CC |a(K)exp>0.078. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
This placement of E|g=1935.9 {I1} is shown as uncertain in the level diagram, but definite in |g-table. The placement is supported by possible 1936|g-50|g coin; however, E|g=1935.19 {I16} is expected. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition not observed, but I(|g+ce) is expected to be strong, based on the decay pattern systematics of the 1/2[521] rotational band. E|g is rounded-off value from the Adopted Gammas data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Placed by evaluator; this 13/2+ to 11/2+ intraband transition is expected but not previously observed (E|g is out of range for ({+40}Ar,3n|g) study by 1990De03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.1 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.2 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.8 {I4}. A{-4} is not consistent with a |DJ=2 transition; there could plausibly be a typographical error in sign. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.72 {I21} (1974Ca28), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.0085 {I16} (1999Da18), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.17 {I6} (1999Da18), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from 0->2->0 cascade assignment from (345|g)(155|g)(|q) and from intensity balance. Lifetime of the 155-keV level is not known but observation of 155|g in |g|g coin suggests that it is short, consequently from RUL, the 155|g is expected to be E2 rather than M2 
$ ICE(K)=100 (1974Ca28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$6.0 {I10} (1974Ca28) is too low by a factor of 2 from that in 1999Da18 
$(345|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.29 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.82 {I7} 
$ ICE(K) AP 0.7 (1974Ca28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$ from 1974Ca28, conversion electron data 
RI$|<0.5 (1974Ca28) 
TI$deduced by the evaluators from Ice(K)=10.0 {I20} (1974Ca28); assuming 80% contribution from K-shell 
$|a(K)exp>1.0, |a(L)exp>0.18 (1999Da18). 1974Ca28 give K/L=6.4 {I13} and |a(K)exp|>6.6 
$ ICE(K)=10.0 20 (1974Ca28) 
$ X(E0/E2)=0.014 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.062 {I13} (1974Ca28,1999Da18) multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 
RI$ GE 9 (1974Ca28) IN FOOTNOTE; BUT LE 9 IN TABLE ^I OF 1974Ca28 
$|a(K)exp=0.062 {I13} from Ice(K) of 1974Ca28 and I|g from 1999Da18 
$ ICE(K)=4.5 9 (1974Ca28) 
ELC$undetermined due to contamination from 510|g from {+182}Re L-line and 500|g M-line from {+182}Pt 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.72 {I21} (1974Ca28) multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 
$(701|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.24 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I22} 
$|a(K)exp>0.27, |a(L)exp>0.027 (1999Da18) 
$ ICE(K)=2.9 5 (1974Ca28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$deduced by the evaluators from |a(K)exp 
RI$4.8 {I5} (1974Ca28) is too low by a factor of |?2 from that in 1999Da18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.0085 {I16} (1999Da18), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 
$(1027|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.32 {I10} 
$ ICE(K)=0.30 6 (1974Ca28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$ from 1974Ca28, conversion electron data 
RI$|<0.5 (1974Ca28) 
TI$deduced by the evaluators from Ice(K)=2.6 {I4} (1974Ca28); assuming 80% contribution from K-shell 
M$seen in ce data only; mult=E0+? 
$ ICE(K)=2.6 4 (1974Ca28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$ E2 assigned by 1997Po02, but |DJ|p requires |DJ=1 which allows M1+E2. The |g(|q) result would imply large significant mixing ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR D(+Q), |d=-0.10 {I+22-10} from (HI,xn|g), but |a(L)exp and |a(K)exp in |e decay imply M1+E2, |d=3 {I+7-1} and are considered adequate to establish |D|p=no for 115|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=3.5 {I4} assuming recommended normalization. 
M L12:L3=70:71, |a(L3)exp=3.0 (1984Ma41); L1:L2:L3=100 {I30}:1600 {I300}:1500 {I300} so |d(M1,E2)>3 (2000Ro41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=3.0 {I5} assuming recommended normalization. 
M |a(L3)exp=2.3 (1984Ma41); K:L3=390 {I80}:900 {I250} (2000Ro41). |d(E2,M1)>4.0 (2000Ro41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.9 {I3} assuming recommended normalization. 
M from Adopted Gammas. E2+M1, |d=3 {I+7-1} from |a(L3)exp=0.63 (1984Ma41) and |a(K)exp=0.9 {I3} (2000Ro41); |d is inconsistent with that from (HI,xn|g) but |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp do establish |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
KC=0.69 10,LC=0.088 13,MC=0.0019 3,NC+=0.0064 10 
%I|g=11.0 {I17} assuming recommended normalization. 
M |a(K)exp=0.69 (1984Ma41) for anomalous E1 transition, |l=58 {I9}. |a(theory)=0.1208. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR from L1:L2:L3=240 {I50}:180 {I40}:130 {I30} (2000Ro41). 
CC consistent with |a|?15 from I(|g+ce)=35 {I5} assuming intensity balance through the 243 level (for which the |DJ=3, |D|p=yes |e feeding is presumed to be negligible) and measured I|g=2.2 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR I(ce(K))|?1.6 so |a(K)exp|?0.041 {I9} for doublet. |d calculated assuming other member of doublet is E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))=0.34 so |a(K)exp|?0.036, consistent with significant E2 admixture in both members of doubly placed line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))(612.5+613.2+614.5)=0.15 so |a(K)exp(triplet)=0.029 {I6}, consistent with all three triplet partners being E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))(727.5+729.6)=0.26 so |a(K)exp=0.029 {I6} for doublet, consistent with M1 component in this, the more intense member of doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))|?0.03 so |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I13}; a little low for E2, but an E1 assignment would be inconsistent with level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))(649.9+651.3)=0.42 so |a(K)exp=0.072 {I15}; consistent with mostly M1 in both components of doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))|?0.3, but includes an Ir contaminant line, so |a(K)exp<0.03, consistent with E1 or M1; level scheme requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))(1532.2+1536.6)=0.08 so |a(K)exp=0.00113 {I24}; consistent with both transitions being E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M I(ce(K))(1656.7+1658.3)=0.04 so |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I7}, suggesting E2 multipolarity for both components of doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR from A{-2}=-0.34 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8}. Note, however, that conversion electron data in |e decay indicates significantly larger |d and rules out |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E for doublet; 376.1 shown in level scheme in 1990Ny02 for this placement and 376.5 for alternative placement. 
M A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI from I(|g+ce)=100 and |a(M3). 
M from L1:L2:L3=36 {I7}: <36:179 {I38} (1998Ro32); I(L3) rounded to 180 {I40} in 2000Ro41. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR %E0=0 {I1}, %M1=82 {I5}, %E2=18 {I4} (1992Xu02) from |e decay. |d(M1,E2) from 1992Xu06; possible small E0 component. Other |d=+18 +|@-13 from |g|g(|q) (1974Ca13) in |e decay. 
CC based on |a(K)exp in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR %E0=22 {I2}, %M1=32 {I+21-29}, %E2=46 {I+29-21} (1992Xu02) from |e decay; |d(M1,E2)-1.2 {I+5-35} (1992Xu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR possible E0 component; %E0=0.3 {I3} from |e decay (1992Xu02). |d from |d=-2.3 {I+11-}|@ (1992Xu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.051 {I10} (1974Ca13), 0.045 {I6} (1992Xu02); other: 1972Fi12. %E0=3.1 {I5}, %M1=44 {I+15-11}, %E2=53 {I+11-15} (1992Xu02) in |e decay. |d(M1,E2)=+1.1 {I3} (1992Xu06) in |e decay. 
CC based on |a(K)exp=0.045 {I6} in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0126 {I14} (1992Xu02); %E0=0.0 {I2}, %M1=51 {I8}, %E2=49 {I8} (1992Xu02) in |e decay. 
MR from |e decay (1992Xu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E from |e decay; E|g=439 {I1} in IT decay. 
Other I|g: 109 {I13} in |e decay, 120 {I25} in IT decay. 
M from IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E from |e decay. E|g=118 {I1} in IT decay and 118.1 in ({+34}S,4n|g). 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in ({+34}S,4n|g); ce data in IT decay imply |d(E1,M2)|?0.44, |a=6.3 {I20} if |D|p=no but also allow M1 or E2, consistent with adopted band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR %E0=0.3 {I4}, %M1=51 {I+12-10}, %E2=49 {I+10-12} (1992Xu02) from |e decay; |d(M1,E2) from 1992Xu06 in |e decay; possible E0 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I2} (1990Ca22); not consistent with E2 character implied by authors' level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?3.7, |a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=1.50. Assigned as E1+M2 in 1966Bu08 implying |d|?0.44. However, |a(K)exp is also consistent with M1 and (|a(L)exp)+(|a(M)exp) with E2. Adopted band structure requires |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.24 {I6} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=61.6 s {I9} for |g(t), 63.7 s {I20} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.091 {I20} (1972Fi12). 
Other I|g: 80 {I8} (1974Ca13), 84 {I11} (1971Hu02). 
T{-1/2} parent=56.5 s {I6} for |g(t), 52.3 s {I6} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp>11 (1974Ca13), |a(K)exp>5.3 (1992Xu02). Other |a(K)exp: 1972Fi12. %E0>75 (1992Xu02). 
T{-1/2} parent=46.2 s {I27} for |g(t), 58.9 s {I14} for ce(K)(t), 65 s {I5} for ce(L)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.051 {I5} (1992Xu02), 0.052 {I10} (1974Ca13), 0.07 {I3} (1972Fi12). %E0=0 {I1}, %M1=82 {I5}, %E2=18 {I4} (1992Xu02). |d from 1992Xu06. Other |d=+18 +|@-13 from |g|g(|q) (1974Ca13). 
Other I|g: 11.9 {I15} (1974Ca13), 14 {I5} (1971Hu02). 
T{-1/2} parent=66.6 s {I12} for |g(t), 59.9 s {I20} for ce(K)(t), 79 s {I9} for ce(L)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 7 {I3} (1971Hu02). 
M |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2} (1974Ca13) 
T{-1/2} parent=66.2 s {I16} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.041 {I7} (1974Ca13), 0.055 {I16} (1972Fi12) 
Other I|g: 35 {I4} (1974Ca13), 40 {I6} (1971Hu02). 
T{-1/2} parent=52.9 s {I6} for |g(t), 53.3 s {I14} for ce(K)(t), 53.5 s {I14} for ce(L)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 1.10 {I15} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=66 s {I3} for |g(t), 63.7 s {I20} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.30 {I3} (1992Xu02); 0.29 {I6} for doublet in 1974Ca13. Other |a(K)exp: 0.6 {I4} (1972Fi12). %E0=22 {I2}, %M1=32 {I+21-29}, %E2=46 {I+29-21} (1992Xu02). |d(M1,E2)=-1.2 {I+5-35} (1992Xu06). 
T{-1/2} parent=79 s {I5} for |g(t), 71.8 s {I24} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0060 {I12} (1974Ca13). 
Other I|g: 10.7 {I12} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=70.9 s {I17} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.60 {I14} (1974Ca13); exceeds |a(K)(M1). However, I|g=0.73 {I14} and E|g=291.9 {I4} in 1974Ca13 is for 291.0|g+294.4|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
I|g=13.2 {I15} in 1974Ca13, 18 {I10} (1971Hu02). 
M |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2} (1974Ca13); other: 0.010 {I7} (1972Fi12). 
MR +9 +|@-5 from |g|g(|q) (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=66.2 s {I14} for |g(t), 65 s {I6} for ce(K)(t), 75 s {I9} for ce(L)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.054 {I21} (1974Ca13); other |a(K)exp=0.07 {I5} (1972Fi12). |d(M1,E2)|>1.2. 
Other I|g: 2.8 {I6} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent: 57.9 s {I18} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.022 {I3} (1992Xu02), 0.023 {I5} (1974Ca13); other |a(K)exp: 0.013 {I7} (1972Fi12). Possible E0 contribution (%E0=0.3 {I3}); %M1=17 {I+29-17}, %E2=82 {I+17-29} (1992Xu02). |d(M1,E2)=-2.3 {I+11-}|@ (1992Xu06). Other |d: 1.5 {I+10-4} (1974Ca13). 
Other I|g: 6.5 {I8} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=54.5 s {I10} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.014 {I7} (1974Ca13), mult=M1,E2; however, level scheme requires |DJ=2. 
Other I|g: 2.5 {I3} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=56.5 s {I16} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.19 {I5} (1992Xu02). Other |a(K)exp: 0.08 {I5} (1972Fi12). %E0<12 (1992Xu02). 
T{-1/2} parent=88 s {I4} for |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
E|g=524.6 {I3}, I|g=0.80 {I15} (1974Ca13) for possibly contaminated line. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.36 {I4} (1992Xu02). Other |a(K)exp: 0.24 {I7} (1974Ca13); possibly unreliable due to contamination. %E0=22 {I2} (1992Xu02). 
CC based on |a(K)exp=0.36 {I4}. 
T{-1/2} parent=47.5 s {I10} for |g(t), 76 s {I5} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.012 {I4} (1992Xu02), |<0.009 (1974Ca13). %E0<0.75 (1992Xu02). 
T{-1/2} parent=73 s {I3} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E|g=586.4 {I2}, I|g=2.3 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.025 {I6} for presumed multiplet in 1974Ca13. 
M from decay scheme. |a(K)exp is consistent with M1+E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.051 {I10} (1974Ca13), 0.045 {I6} (1992Xu02); other: 1972Fi12. %E0=3.1 {I5}, %M1=44 {I+15-11}, %E2=53 {I+11-15} (1992Xu02). |d(M1,E2)=+1.1 {I3} (1992Xu06). 
CC based on |a(K)exp=0.045 {I6}. 
T{-1/2} parent=61.9 s {I20} for |g(t), 60 s {I3} for ce(K)(t), 75 s {I9} for ce(L)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas. 
Other I|g: 4.7 {I6} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=64.8 s {I21} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
From 1974Ca13; absence of |g in 2006KrZT and implied M3 multipolarity lead evaluator to indicate placement as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.042 {I24} (1972Fi12); mult=E2(+M1), |d(M1,E2)|<1.7, but level scheme does not allow M1 component. 
Other I|g: 1.0 {I5} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=51.4 s {I20} for |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I16} (1974Ca13) implies E2(+M1); D+Q transition from Adopted Gammas. 
T{-1/2} parent=53.4 s {I10} for |g(t), 57 s {I7} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1974Ca13. Other E|g: 783 {I1} in 2006KrZT. 
Other I|g: 1.8 {I2} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent: 55 s {I3} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.0126 {I14} (1992Xu02), 0.009 {I3} (1974Ca13). %E0=0.0 {I2}, %M1=51 {I8}, %E2=49 {I8} (1992Xu02). |d from 1992Xu06. 
T{-1/2} parent=54.1 s {I12} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp>0.4 (1992Xu02), >0.37 (1974Ca13). %E0>24 (1992Xu02). 
CC based on |a(K)exp>0.4. 
T{-1/2} parent=59 s {I3} from ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=627.5 {I3}, I|g=0.60 {I8} in 1974Ca13 suggests the presence of a contaminant in that experiment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.8 {I1} (1974Ca13). 
M |a(K)exp|<0.006 (1992Xu02). 
MR -1.6 {I+8-}|@ (1992Xu06). 
T{-1/2} parent=57 s {I5} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E >5|s from expected value; datum excluded from least-squares fit. 
Other I|g: 1.10 {I10} (1974Ca13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} (1974Ca13) 
T{-1/2} parent=53.3 s {I11} for |g(t), 58 s {I3} for ce(K)(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.64 {I9} (1974Ca13). 
M from Adopted Gammas. 
T{-1/2} parent=52.5 s {I22} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 1.05 {I15} (1974Ca13). 
M from Adopted Gammas. 
T{-1/2} parent=62 s {I4} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 1.05 {I10} (1974Ca13). 
M from Adopted Gammas. 
T{-1/2} parent=52.2 s {I26} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} (1992Xu02). %E0=0.3 {I4}, %M1=51 {I+12-10}, %E2=49 {I+10-12} (1992Xu02). |d(M1,E2) from 1992Xu06. 
Other I|g: 1.9 {I2} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent=55.5 s {I22} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=1084.8 {I3} in 1974Ca13. 
Other I|g: 1.00 {I15} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent: 57 s {I4} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 479.6 {I2} in 1974Ca13. 
Other I|g: 0.63 {I9} (1974Ca13). 
T{-1/2} parent: 46.9 s {I19} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 4.1 {I6} (1974Ca13), 7.4 {I25} (1971Hu02). 
T{-1/2} parent: 53.1 s {I9} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.60 {I9} (1974Ca13). 
E ~6|s from expected value; datum excluded from least-squares fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 1.10 {I20} (1974Ca13); possibly includes 1455.5|g, but E|g=1459.4 {I3} (1974Ca13) argues against this. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=2.8 {I3}, E|g=1713.8 {I4} in 1974Ca13 is presumed to be for 1713.1|g+1716.5|g doublet. 
T{-1/2} parent: 79 s {I5} from |g(t) (1992XuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (1990Ca22). Pure |DJ=1; if |D|p=no, some Q admixture would be expected, so |D|p=(yes) is assigned. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=18.8 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} (1990Ca22) for triplet that is probably dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of data from (|a,6n|g) and {+186}Au |e decay. 
$I(ce)/I|g(799)=0.099 {I20} (1970Jo02 - {+186}Au |e decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M stretched Q from DCO ratio in {+188}Os(|a,6n|g); M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. g.s. band intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.42 {I7} or +3.8 {I9} from |g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07 - {+186}Au |e decay) |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$ Weighted average of data from {+186}Au |e decay and (|a,6n|g). I|g Other: 29 {I9} in (|a,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M DCO consistent with pure stretched D or with D+Q (|d|>1.4) |DJ=0 transition. |DJ=1, |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from DCO ratio in (|a,6n|g); M1(+E2) from K/L and |a(K)exp in (|a,4n|g). 
MR |<0.46 from K/L in (|a,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from ce data of 1970Jo02; 191.5 {I3} from 1972Fi12. 
K:L1:L2:L3=100:20 {I3}:54 {I5}:42 {I5} (1970Jo02). (L1+L2)/L3=1.89 {I23}, L1/L2=0.34 {I5} from 1970Jo02). |a{-k}=0.19 (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI I|g<0.4. A very weak |g observed by 1972Fi12 at 470.8 keV can be explained, by summing 191.5 + 279.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from ce data of 1970Jo02; 415.5 {I3} from 1972Fi12. Other |a(K)exp: 0.072 {I30} (1970Jo02). 
MR -0.38 {I4} or +19 {I+20-8} from |g(|q,H,t); 0.3 {I3} from |a(K)exp. -0.38 results in |a{-k}=0.95 which fits value from (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR -0.85 {I9} or +10 {I+11-3} from |g(|q,H,t); 0.3 {I+16-3} from |a(K)exp. 
Tentative placement from 1972Fi12; confirmed in (|a,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M $ |d(E3/M2)=+0.25{++44}{--21} or +3.7{++136}{--23} from |g(|q,H,t), however an E3/M2 1141 keV transition would not compete with a 1143 keV E1, multiplicity not adopted. 
MR +0.25 {I+44-21} or +3.7 {I+136-23} from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a{-k}=0.72 {I13} (1972Fi12) suggesting M1 multipolarity 
MR -0.309 {I23} or +1.79 {I9} from |g(|q,H,t); 0.3 {I3} from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.71~{I8}; consistent with pure stretched D or with Q(+D) (|d|>1.4) |DJ=0 transition (1990He19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.54~{I12} from K/L=6.2~{I8} (read from fig. 6 of 1979Ri08) and K/K(299)=5.8~{I8} from delayed intensities from 4.6~ns isomer (1979Ri08), assuming I(|g+ce)(243)=I(|g+ce)(299), |a(M+..)(243)/|a(L)(243)|?0.3 and mult(299|g)=E2. 
$|d(M1,E2)|<0.46 from K/L. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR +59 +|@-30 or -16 {I+8-}|@ if J(51.2)=1/2; |d=-3.2 {I3} if J(51.2)=3/2 (1992Ro15). From |a(K)exp=0.17 assuming 5% uncertainty yields |d=5.2 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$%E0|?74 (1979Be51); X(E0/E2)=0.3 {I+12-0}.1 with |d=-0.6 {I+4-5} for M1+E2 (1992Ro15); penetration parameter |l|?-80 with |d=-0.41 {I16} or |l|?213 with |d=-0.96 {I17} (1992Ro15). 
CC$|?3.9 - Estimated by the evaluator using |d=-0.6 {I+4-5} and the |W(E0) values for K,L1,L2 shells (obtained using Bricc). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$%E0|?83 (1979Be51); X(E0/E2)>0.17 with |d{+2}<5 (1992Ro15); penetration parameter |l<-80 or >160 (1992Ro15). 
CC$|?6.3 - Estimated by the evaluator using |d|?2.2 and the |W(E0) values for K,L1,L2 shells (obtained using Bricc). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$+1.8 {I+3-2} or -0.01 {I6} if J(51.2)=1/2; +2.3 +1.2-6 or +0.78 {I+25-19} if J(51.2)=3/2 ({+187}Au |e decay - 1992Ro15). |d |?0.4 from |a(K)exp=0.02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=20.7. Other: |a(K)exp=18 {I4} from I(117|g) and I(delayed K x rays), assuming that all delayed platinum K x rays were due to conversion of the 117.3|g ({+186}Os(|a,3n|g)-1976Pi03) 
RI$from 1979Be51. This value agrees better with the intensity balance through the 174 level. Other value: 1.4 {I1} (1983Gn01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.3, |a(L1)exp=0.3, |a(L2)exp=0.07, |a(L3)exp=0.08. The |a(K)exp is consistent with M1, but |a(L1)exp, |a(L2)exp, and |a(L3)exp are significantly too large. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR +59 +|@-30 or -16 {I+8-}|@ if J(51.2)=1/2; |d=-3.2 {I3} if J(51.2)=3/2 (1992Ro15). From |a(K)exp=0.17 assuming 5% uncertainty yields |d=5.2 {I11}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=3.4 
MR$%E0|?74 (1979Be51); X(E0/E2)=0.3 {I+12-0}.1 with |d=-0.6 {I+4-5} for M1+E2 (1992Ro15); penetration parameter |l|?-80 with |d=-0.41 {I16} or |l|?213 with |d=-0.96 {I17} (1992Ro15). 
CC$|?3.9 - Estimated by the evaluator using |d=-0.6 {I+4-5} and the |W(E0) values for K,L1,L2 shells (obtained using Bricc). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|?0.05 (1979Be51); |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3} (1983Gn01) 
MR$pure E2 if J(51.2)=1/2, -9.5 +4.5-73.1 if J(51.2)=3/2 (1992Ro15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=5.4 (1979Be51); |a(K)exp=5.7 {I14} (1983Gn01) 
MR$%E0|?83 (1979Be51); X(E0/E2)>0.17 with |d{+2}<5 (1992Ro15); penetration parameter |l<-80 or >160 (1992Ro15). 
CC$|?6.3 - Estimated by the evaluator using |d|?2.2 and the |W(E0) values for K,L1,L2 shells (obtained using Bricc). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$or -7 {I+2-6} (1992Ro15); Other: 1.1 {I4} from |a(K)exp=0.07 {I2}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.07 {I2} (1983Gn01); |a(K)exp=0.07 (1979Be51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E 498.8 keV in 1979Be51 and 1992Ro15 
M |a(K)exp>0.95 (1979Be51). E0+M1+E2 proposed by 1979Be51 and 1983Gn01, %E0|?60 (1979Be51). 1992Ro15 ruled out E0 component from the spin assignments and attributed the large |a(K)exp to an anomaly in the M1 conversion. Other: |a(K)exp=1.7 for doublet (1986RoZI). 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from |a(K)exp>0.95. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp>0.58 (1979Be51); |a(K)exp=0.8 {I3} (1983Gn01); |a(K)exp=1.7 for doublet (1986RoZI). 1979Be51 and 1983Gn01 expected E0 component (%E0|?60 (1979Be51)) for the 498|g due to high |a(K)exp value. Either of the E0 component or abnormal M1 conversion in the mass region for this element is possible, however 1992Ro15 states it is difficult to determine unambiguously. Without a specific J|p assignment for this level, (M1+E2) is assigned by the evaluator. 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from |a(K)exp>0.58. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR +0.24 {I3} if J(620)=3/2, 0 |+1.5 if J(620)=1/2 (1992Ro15) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.030 (1979Be51); |a(K)exp=0.032 (1986RoZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.036 (1979Be51); |a(K)exp=0.017 (1986RoZI) 
MR$or -2.6 {I+8-18} (1992Ro15). |d |?0.3 from |a(K)exp=0.036. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$+1.8 {I+3-2} or -0.01 {I6} if J(51.2)=1/2; +2.3 {I+12-6} or +0.78 {I+25-19} if J(51.2)=3/2 (1992Ro15). |d |?0.4 from |a(K)exp=0.02. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.02 (1979Be51); |a(K)exp=0.019 (1986RoZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$In the adopted levels, 379.0|g placed from 3992.2 keV (J=37/2) and 379.1|g from 2070.7 keV (J|p=25/2-). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$Placement of a 397.6|g is only from 902.8 keV level in {+173}Yb({+18}O,4n|g) and the 573 keV level is absent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Placement of a 546.6|g is from 2263.7 keV level (J|p=25/2-) only in {+173}Yb({+18}O,4n|g) and this level is absent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Placement of a 481.4|g is from 2745 keV level (J|p=29/2-) in {+173}Yb({+18}O,4n|g) and this level is absent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$Placement of 504.5|g and 504.7|g from 3297.5 keV and 1657.9 keV levels, respectively, in {+173}Yb({+18}O,4n|g) and this level is absent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Placement of a 542.0|g is from 3287.1 keV level (J|p=33/2-) in {+173}Yb({+18}O,4n|g) and this level is absent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Placement of a 294.1|g is from 3075.8 keV level (J=33/2) (different band member) in {+173}Yb({+18}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
E from 1976Pi03 
M$|a(K)exp=18 {I4} from I(117|g) and I(delayed K x rays), assuming that all delayed platinum K x rays were due to conversion of the 117.3|g (1976Pi03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From K/L1=7.4 {I14}, L1/L2=0.44 {I9}, L1/L3=0.77 {I17} (1970Jo02), K/L3=5.8 {I7} and |a(L3)exp=0.0143 {I7} (1972Fi12); K/L=2.4, |a(L)exp=0.032 (1971Hu02); DCO=1.13 {I3} and POL=0.11 {I3} (2017Mu12); K/L|?2 (1979Ri08); A{-2}=0.216 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.030 {I11} (1967Ne02); A{-2}=0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(L3)exp=0.0060 {I4} (1972Fi12). Others: |a(K)exp=0.055 {I5} (1970Jo02) and K/M=13.9, |a(K)exp=0.055, |a(L)exp=0.004 (1971Hu02). However, 1972Fi12 pointed out that ce(K)(340|g) is complex. DCO=1.02 {I10} and POL=-0.05 {I9} (2017Mu12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0114 {I4} (1972Fi12); |a(K)exp=0.009 (1971Hu02). DCO=1.10 {I3} and POL=0.11 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(L3)exp=0.0023 {I3} (1972Fi12). Also |a(M)exp=0.0027 {I5} (1972Fi12), but the authors pointed out that this line is complex in ce data. DCO=1.02 {I2} and POL=0.12 {I2} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.270 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I14} (1967Ne02); A{-2}=0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 95 {I10} in (HI,xn|g) 
M$From |a(L3)exp=0.0055 {I7} (1972Fi12). A{-2}=-0.08 {I5}, A{-4}=0.08 {I5} (1988KaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 40.2 {I16} in (HI,xn|g) 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.078 {I11} (1972Fi12) for 413.3|g+414.79|g. A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=-0.22 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I16} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(L)exp=0.0057 {I10} (1972Fi12). DCO=1.17 {I7} and POL=0.09 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.43 {I14}, A{-4}=0.08 {I17} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.023 {I2}, |a(L3)exp=0.0066 {I25}, |a(M)exp=0.0050 {I18} (1972Fi12). Authors' |a(L3)exp agrees with |a(L) rather than with |a(L3). Ice(L3) given by 1972Fi12 should possibly be interpreted as (Ice(L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$850.9 {I3} in (HI,xn|g) 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.22 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.038 {I2}, and |a(M)exp=0.0098 {I20} (1972Fi12). A{-2}=-0.63 {I5}, A{-4}=0.19 {I5} (1988KaZW) 
MR$-1.1 {I+20-2} from |g(|q) (1988KaZW) 
CC$0.27 {I1}, deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp + |a(M)exp in 1972Fi12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.95 {I5} and POL=0.10 {I4} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.187 {I22}, A{-4}=-0.078 {I25} (1967Ne02); A{-2}=0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.061 {I3} and |a(L)exp=0.011 {I2} (1972Fi12) indicate E0 admixtures 
CC$0.076 {I5} deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp |* (1 + M/L + N/L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.065 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0075 {I8} (1972Fi12) indicate E0 admixtures 
CC$0.076 {I3} deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp |* (1 + M/L + N/L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=0.12 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=-0.22 {I18}, A{-4}=0.05 {I24} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$ DCO=0.49 {I2} and POL=0.12 {I3} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=-0.30 {I5}, A{-4}=0.06 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=0.07 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=-0.15 {I12}, A{-4}=0.02 {I16} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.20 {I2} and POL=0.28 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.53 {I2} and POL=0.11 {I3} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=-0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.95 {I5} and POL=0.12 {I6} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.11 {I1} and |a(L)exp=0.089 {I8} (1972Fi12) 
CC$0.225 {I14} deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp |* (1 + M/L + N/L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.77 {I3} and POL=-0.17 {I11} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.51 {I5}, A{-4}=0.03 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.50 {I7}, A{-4}=0.11 {I8} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.06 {I3} and POL=0.10 {I4} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.01 {I5} and POL=0.10 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.37 {I5}, A{-4}=0.03 {I6} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.11 {I4} and POL=0.13 {I3} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1979DaZN); A{-2}=0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1988KaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.07 {I5} and POL=0.24 {I7} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.25 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I13} (1979DaZN); A{-2}=0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1988KaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.14 {I4} and POL=0.10 {I4} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.38 {I7}, A{-4}=0.06 {I9} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.96 {I7} and POL=0.12 {I3} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.16 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I9} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.15 {I4} (2017Mu12); K/L|?0.7 (1979Ri08); A{-2}=0.22 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.23 {I10} (1979DaZN); A{-2}=0.10 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1988KaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.016 {I2} (1972Fi12), which suggests E0 admixtures 
CC$0.0200 {I25} deduced from ce(K)/(|g+ce) and |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.17 {I5} and POL=0.22 {I4} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I7} (1979DaZN); A{-2}=0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1988KaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.21 {I20} and POL=0.15 {I10} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.38 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I10} (1979DaZN); A{-2}=0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1988KaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.27 {I6} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.44 {I11}, A{-4}=0.05 {I13} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.20 {I6} and POL=0.07 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.31 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I13} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.11 {I4} and POL=0.11 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.28 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I9} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.05 {I4} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I6} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.28 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I9} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1970Jo02), 266.02 {I2} (1978CoYZ), 265.6 {I5} (1972Fi12) 
M$from K/L1=7.4 {I14}, L1/L2=0.44 {I9}, L1/L3=0.77 {I17} (1970Jo02), K/L3=5.8 {I7} and |a(L3)exp=0.0143 {I7} (1972Fi12); K/L=2.4, |a(L)exp=0.032 (1971Hu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1970Jo02), 340.42 {I2} (1978CoYZ), 339.9 {I5} (1972Fi12) 
RI$Other: 22.7 {I30} (1971Hu02) and 23.5 {I5} (1972Fi12) 
M$from |a(L3)exp=0.0060 {I4} (1972HuZL). Others: |a(K)exp=0.055 {I5} (1970Jo02) and K/M=13.9; |a(K)exp=0.055, |a(L)exp=0.004 (1971Hu02). However, 1972Fi12 pointed out that ce(K)(340|g) is complex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1970Jo02), 606.06 {I2} (1978CoYZ), 605.6 {I5} (1972Fi12) 
RI$Other: 15.5 {I21} (1971Hu02) and 14.6 {I3} (1972Fi12) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0114 {I4} (1972HuZL); |a(K)exp=0.009 (1971Hu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$405.49 in ce data (1970Jo02), 405.0 {I5} (1972Fi12) 
RI$Other: 7.7 {I20} (1971Hu02) and 8.2 {I2} (1972Fi12) 
M$from |a(L3)exp=0.0023 {I3} (1972HuZL). Also |a(M)exp=0.0027 {I5} (1972Fi12), but the authors pointed out that this line is complex in the ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 4.1 {I20} (1971Hu02) and 5.49 {I11} (1972Fi12) 
M$from |a(L)exp=0.0039 {I4}, |a(K)exp=0.014 (1971Hu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I2} (1972HuZL). Also |a(L3)exp=0.0066 {I25}, |a(M)exp=0.0050 {I18} (1972Fi12). Authors' |a(L3)exp agrees with |a(L) rather than with |a(L3). Ice(L3) given by 1972Fi12 should possibly be interpreted as (Ice(L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.22 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.038 {I2}, and |a(M)exp=0.0098 {I20} (1972HuZL) 
CC$0.27 {I1} from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp + |a(M)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.061 {I3} and |a(L)exp=0.011 {I2} (1972HuZL) indicate E0 admixtures 
CC$0.076 {I5} deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp|*(1 + M/L + N/L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.065 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0075 {I8} (1972HuZL) indicate E0 admixtures 
CC$0.076 {I3} deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp|*(1 + M/L + N/L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ce(K)(471|g)/ce(K)(266|g)=0.16 {I3} (1970Jo02) gives ce(K)(471|g)=2.8 {I5} using ce(K)(266|g)=17.3 {I7} (1972Fi12). However, no such transition reported in the ce data of 1972Fi12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From 1972Fi12. Other: 499.58 {I25} in 1978CoYZ deviates by 5|s 
RI$Other: 0.13 {I1} (1972Fi12) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I1} and |a(L)exp=0.089 {I8} (1972HuZL) 
CC$0.225 {I14} deduced from |a(K)exp + |a(L)exp |* (1 + M/L + N/L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.016 {I2} (1972HuZL) suggests E0 admixtures 
CC$0.0200 {I25} deduced from ce(K)/(|g+ce) and |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.13 {I3} and POL=0.11 {I3} (2017Mu12); K/L|?2 (1979Ri08); A{-2}=0.216 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.030 {I11} (1967Ne02); A{-2}=0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.10 {I3} and POL=0.11 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.02 {I2} and POL=0.12 {I2} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.270 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I14} (1967Ne02); A{-2}=0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.17 {I7} and POL=0.09 {I5} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.43 {I14}, A{-4}=0.08 {I17} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From 1988KaZW 
M$A{-2}=-0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=0.12 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=-0.22 {I18}, A{-4}=0.05 {I24} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.12 {I3} and POL=0.10 {I6} (2017Mu12); A{-2}=0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} (1988KaZW); A{-2}=0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I5} (1979DaZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$in (|a,3n|g) and the previous evaluation, this |g was placed from a 1530 keV level with (23/2-). In ({+18}O,5n|g), coincidence relations found the 740.7 feeding the 945 keV level. This matches the 184 |g feeding the 1512 keV level followed by the 557 |g populating the 954 keV level. The 18.6 keV and and 184 |g's match and are parallel to the 202 |g feeding the 1512 keV level but with the order of the 18.6 and 184 |g rays now reversed. See 2009Hu12 for further discussion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
CC$from intensity balance through 237 level. Transition placed by the evaluators on the basis of energy sums 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=59 {I3}, using the calculated normalization. 
$L1:L2:L3=35 {I10}:115 {I25}:60 {I20} 
E$from 1970Fi16 
CC$from 1970Fi16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1970Fi16. Transition placed by the evaluators on the basis of Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
RI$from 1973Ja16 
M$from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of 605.21 {I12} (|e decay), 604.48 {I17} (|a,2n|g) and 604.46 {I17} (p,2n|g). Weighted average is 604.84 {I26} with normalized |h{+2}=9.5 
MR$from |a(K)exp and K/(L1+L2) ratio in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(E2,M1)
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of 907.30 {I9} (|e decay), 906.5 {I2} (|a,2n|g) and 906.5 {I2} (p,2n|g). Weighted average is 907.07 {I26} with normalized |h{+2}=11.4 
RI$NRM weighted average of 97.2 {I24} (|e decay), 46 {I12} (|a,2n|g) and 89 {I11} (p,2n|g). Weighted average is 95 {I7} with normalized |h{+2}=8.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$deduced from ce(K)/ce(K)(296|g)=0.0124 {I5} (1973Jo11), 0.0110 {I25} (1972Fi12) and ce(L1+L2)/ce(K)(296|g)=0.0019 {I5} (1971Hu11). ce(L3)/ce(K)(296|g)<0.0018 (1971Hu11) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.62 {I12} (1972Fi12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(E2,M1)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=3.2 {I4} (1973Jo11) 
$|a(M)exp value is for M1 to M5 shells 
$I(E0)=0.10 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for 1203.4|g+1205.5|g 
E,RI$from 1972Fi12, who also report a 1205.5|g (I|g=0.41). Only one |g at 1203.1 (I|g=0.70 {I20}) reported by 1973Jo11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$5.2 {I5} (1972HuZL) 
M$(M1,E2) from ce data 
$|d(E2/M1)=1.2 {I+11-5} from |a(K)exp; also Mult=M1 is not excluded 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=604.5 {I2} (1976Hj01) 
$Placement from 1974Ya03. 1976Hj01 placed it deexciting 1733 level 
$E|g=604.46 {I17}, I|g=1.8 {I5} (1974Ya03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=422.6 {I3} (1976Hj01) 
$E|g=422.3 {I4}, I|g=2.1 {I3} (1974Ya03) 
$Placement from 1974Ya03. Unplaced in 1976Hj01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=597.6, I|g=4.8 (1976Hj01) 
$I|g(598|g)/I|g(302|g)=0.53 is high by |?25% as compared to the adopted branching ratios (see the Adopted Gammas) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=343.4, I|g=16.5; ce(K)=2.3, ce(L)=0.4 (1976Hj01) 
$ce(K), ce(L), |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp for 342.6|g+343.5|g+345.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=369.3, I|g=1.4 (1976Hj01) 
MR$from |g(|q) (1976Hj01), but note that positive A{-2} is inconsistent with |DJ=1, dipole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=219.1, I|g=5.5; ce(K)|?0.7, ce(L)=0.9 (1976Hj01) 
$ce(K), ce(L), |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp for 217.2|g+219.1|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=687.8; ce(K)=0.12 for doublet (1976Hj01) 
RI$from 1976Hj01. Total intensity of doublet=10.3 {I11} (1976Cu02), 11.5 (1976Hj01) 
$|a(K)exp, A{-2} and A{-4} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=217.1, I|g=3.0; ce(K)|?0.7, ce(L)=0.9 (1976Hj01) 
$ce(K), ce(L), |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp for 217.2|g+219.1|g 
$Placement from 1976Hj01, unplaced in 1976Cu02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=342.4, I|g=11.5; ce(K)=2.3, ce(L)=0.4 (1976Hj01) 
$ce(K), ce(L), |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp for 342.6|g+343.5|g+345.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=345.6, I|g=3.0; ce(K)=2.3, ce(L)=0.4 (1976Hj01) 
$ce(K), ce(L), |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp for 342.6|g+343.5|g+345.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=441.0, I|g=100 {I5} (2008Ma58) 
RI$total intensity for 441.3|g and 441.2|g doublet 
$R{-ADO}=1.17 {I9} for unresolved 441.3|g and 441.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$intensity is not given by 2014Li21, as the |g line is unresolved from the strong 620.0 from the first 10+ state at 2535 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=507.0 (2008Ma58) 
$R{-ADO}=1.20 {I17} and I|g for unresolved triplet: 507.4|g, 506.6|g and 508.3|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$intensity is not given by 2014Li21, as the |g line is unresolved from the strong 441.3|g from the first 4+ state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E|g=507.1 (2008Ma58) 
RI$intensity is not given by 2014Li21, as the |g line is unresolved from the strong 507.4|g from the 3577, 16+ state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From |a in {+189}Os(|a,2n|g), E2 is the main component (1977Ke18); Q from |g(|q) in {+190}Os(|a,3n|g) (1977Sa01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=0.057 {I16} (|a,2n|g), E2 is the main component (1977Ke18); Q from |g(|q) in {+190}Os(|a,3n|g) (1977Sa01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 380.3 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 380.2 {I1} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 71 {I7} from (|a,2n|g) and 84 {I8} from (|a,3n|g) 
M M1 predominant from (|a,2n|g), D(+Q) from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M From I{-e} measurements in (|a,2n|g), M1 is the main component (1977Ke18); D(+Q) from |g(|q) in {+190}Os(|a,3n|g) (1977Sa01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.015 {I4} (|a,2n|g), E2 is the main component (1977Ke18); Q from |g(|q) in {+190}Os(|a,3n|g) (1977Sa01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 207.0 {I5} from ({+11}B,p5n|g), 207.6 {I3} from (|a,2n|g), and 207.8 {I6} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 559.0 {I5} from ({+11}B,p5n|g), 559.2 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 559.3 {I3} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 687.0 {I5} from ({+11}B,p5n|g), 687.5 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), and 687.3 {I2} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 100 {I13} from ({+11}B,p5n|g), 100 {I10} from (|a,2n|g), and 100 {I7} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 55 {I9} from ({+11}B,p5n|g), 47 {I10} from (|a,2n|g), and 54 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 66 {I6} from ({+11}B,p5n|g), 68 {I16} from (|a,2n|g), and 63 {I6} from (|a,3n|g) 
M |g(|q) data in ({+11}B,p5n|g), (|a,3n|g), (|a,2n|g) is consistent with a |DJ=0 transition. However, I{-e}(K)exp=0.4 for 430.3 K + 432 K in (|a,2n|g) supports E2, although M1 was excluded as the main component (1977Ke18 - (|a,2n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M Q in 1977Sa01 and 1977Ke18 (|g(|q) in {+190}Os(|a,3n|g) and {+189}Os(|a,2n|g), respectively); E2 from intensity balance (2005Ku01); M2 strength exceeds recommended upper limit with adopted level T{-1/2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI Unweighted average of 27 {I5} from (|a,3n|g) and 12 {I4} from ({+11}B,p5n|g). 
M$M1 in ({+11}B,p5n|g), D(+Q) in (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from level energies difference. 441 in Table I, transition was very weak and unresolved from the strong multiplet at 445 keV. Its existence was confirmed indirectly from coincidences (2005Ku01). 
RI deduced from observed coincidences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from level energies difference - E|g not seen in |g-ray spectrum. 64 in Table I (2005Ku01) 
RI deduced from coincidences between transitions in bands (F), (I), and (J). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1976Pi03. Other values: 94 {I10} (1968Io01), 90.8 {I3} (1967Co20) 
M |a(K)exp=1.1 {I3} (1967Co20) is consistent with E2, E3, and E4 multipolarities. Not E3 or E4 from RUL for T{-1/2}(100.6 level)|<100 |ms. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 30.27 {I6} (1976Pi06). 
RI Other: 269 {I40} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(N1) exp=403 {I40}:50 {I11}:14 {I5}: 88 {I7}:10 {I3}:28 {I5} (1967Jo06). L1/L2=8.1 {I19}, L1/L3=29 {I11}, M1/M2=8.8 {I27} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=85 {I16} from ce data, considering ce(M2)<230 as 115 {I115}. 
M from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(O) exp=9.0 {I15}:210 {I20}:185 {I20}: <230:54 {I6}:4.0 {I14} (1967Jo06); discarded ce(K) exp=17 {I4}, outlier in ce data fit, and ce(N2) exp=28 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(N1):ce(N3): ce(O1) exp=205 {I15}:20 {I5}:95 {I15}:52 {I5}:5.3 {I15}:23 {I4}: 18 {I3}: 10 {I4}: 4.0 {I15} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 158.89 {I4} (1976Pi06) and 158.83 {I4} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(M):ce(N) exp=80 {I20}:21 {I2}:6.9 {I14} (coin with lines of other isotope):9.7 {I15}: 1.4 {I2} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.92 {I24}, L1/L2=3.0 {I7}, |a(M)=0.11 {I2}, |a(N)=0.016 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: : 136.16 {I4} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=66 {I5}:10.2 {I10}: 3.1 {I4}: 1.4 {I3}:5.8 {I8}:1.8 {I4} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=1.65 {I21}, L1/L2=3.3 {I5}, L1/L3=7.3 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: : 166.56 {I3} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=<230 (coin with other lines):29 {I3}:9.4 {I15}: 5.1 {I10}: 10 {I2}:<24 (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). L1/L2=3.1 {I6}, L1/L3=5.7 {I13}, |a(M)=0.051 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from ce data fit: Mult(24.39|g): from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3) \:ce(N1):ce(N23) exp: 95 {I25}:56 {I25}:86 {I30}:20 {I4}:14 {I3}:19 {I3}:10 {I3}:12 {I3} (1967Jo06). 1967Jo06 assigned an E1 multipolarity to this transition based on the L subshell ratios; however, M1 + 2% E2 gives a best fit and is consistent with the placement of the 24.39-keV transition on the level scheme given in 1976Pi06. L1/L2=1.7 {I9}, L1/L3=1.1 {I5}, M1/M2=1.4 {I4}, M1/M3=1.1 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 244.32 {I6} (1967Jo06). 
M from |a(L)exp=0.06 {I2} ((|S ce(L) (1967Jo06))/I|g) 
MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=2.5 {I5}:0.63 {I10}:0.29 {I10}; ce(M) exp=0.13 {I3} rejected, outlier in ce data fit. ce(K)<24 (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). L1/L2=4.0 {I10}, L1/L3=8.6 {I34} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 253.90 {I5} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=13.0 {I10}:1.94 {I20}:4.7 {I5}:2.2 {I4}: 3.5 {I7}; ce(N) exp=2.1 {I4} (1967Jo06) rejected, outlier. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 247.43 {I8} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR From ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=6.7 {I8}:1.12 {I15}:1.34 {I20} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.15 {I2}, L1/L2=0.8 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 268.25 {I10} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR From ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=31 {I7}:5.0 {I15}:0.61 {I20}:0.14 {I6}: 2.5 {I10} - all had coin with other lines (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.27 {I6}, L1/L2=8 {I4}, L1/L3=36 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other: 277.84 {I3} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=100: 16.9 {I10}: 1.5 {I3}:0.12 {I6}:4.1 {I4}: <3.6 (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 271.62 {I5} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp= <31 (coin with other lines): 4.1 {I3}:1.74 {I20}: <2.2 (coin with other lines): 2.3 {I3} (1967Jo06). L1/L2=2.4 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR From ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=16 {I2}:3.9 {I5}: <0.50 (mix with other lines) (1967Jo06). |a(K)=1.9 {I4}, |a(L1)=0.46 {I10} 
RI From ce data of 1967Jo06, considering ce(L2)<0.5 as 0.25 {I25}. Other: 9 {I1} from 1976Pi06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.13 {I5}, obtained from 114.37 keV ce line observed by 1967Jo06 with Ice=2.0 {I5} and assigning it to K conversion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 263.05 {I15} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=7.8 {I10}:1.9 {I3}: <2.2 (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 283.88 {I6} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=79 {I4}:11.4 {I10}:1.64 {I20}: 1.06 {I15}: <6.5 (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.20 {I2}, L1/L2=7.0 {I10}, L1/L3=10.8 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 293.45 {I6} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(M) exp=30 {I5} (coin with other lines):5.3 {I10} (coin with other lines):<2.5 (coin with other lines): 2.3 {I5} (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 132.98 {I4} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=151 {I10}:25.4 {I15}:3.5 {I5}:2.1 {I5}: 4.9 {I7} (1967Jo06). |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3}, L1/L2=7.3 {I11}, L1/L3=12 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=2.7 {I11}, obtained from 29.97 keV ce line observed by 1967Jo06 with Ice=8 {I2} and assigning it to K conversion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=2.0 {I11}, obtained from 67.47 keV ce line observed by 1967Jo06 with Ice=12 {I4} and assigning it to K conversion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 390.23 {I5} (1967Jo06) and 390.27 {I4} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=17.9 {I15}:3.4 {I3}:0.44 {I10}:0.6 {I3} (1967Jo06). |a(K)exp=0.112 {I12}, L1/L2=7.7 {I19}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 399.84 {I7} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=7.9 {I6}: <1.9 (coin with other lines):1.7 {I3}:0.5 {I3}: <1.5 (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E Other: 421.44 {I6} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(M) exp=16.3 {I15}:3.05 {I20}:0.35 {I11}:0.46 {I7} (1967Jo06). |a(K)exp=0.080 {I9}, L1/L2=8.7 {I28}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other: 442.18 {I10} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L12):ce(M) exp=3.4 {I3}:0.51 {I8}:0.37 {I6} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.097 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 451.87 {I10} (1967Jo06). 
RI For doublet with 451.21|g, placed from 1113.4 keV level 
M |a(K)exp<0.076, |a(L1)exp=0.021 {I2}, |a(L2)exp<0.004, |a(L3)exp=0.0053 {I8} (deduced value using ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3)= <5.9:1.63 {I15}:<0.3: 0.42 {I6} - (1967Jo06) and I|g) for the doublet, and theory: E2 (0.023,0.003,0.0025,0.0011) and M1 (0.084,0.012,0.0011,0,0001), would require multipolarity |>3 for at least one of the transitions forming the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=1.3 {I7}, obtained from 69.00 keV ce line observed by 1967Jo06 with Ice=65 {I20} and assigning it to K conversion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 280.34 {I10} (1967Jo06) 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=11.7 {I10}:1.54 {I20}: 2.81 {I30}:1.71 {I20}: <3.6 (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: : 87.55 {I6} (1976Pi06). 
RI Other: 12 {I1} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1) exp=4.4 {I6}:1.5 {I6}:0.55 {I22}:0.8 {I2} (1967Jo06). L1/L2=2.9 {I12}, L1/L3=8.0 {I34} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Weighted average of 194.17 {I3} (1976Pi06) and 194.11 {I3} (1967Jo06) 
M,MR From ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=93 {I10} (coin with other lines):18.8 {I15}:2.3 {I4} (coin with other lines):1.6 {I3}: 4.7 {I8} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.58 {I7}, L1/L2=8.2 {I16}, L1/L3=11.8 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E Other: 206.46 {I5} (1976Pi06). 
RI from doublet I|g=130 {I10} (1976Pi06) minus I|g=82 {I17} from 660 keV level decay. 
M |a(K)exp=0.58 (76(ce)/130(I|g)) for the doublet is compatible with assignment. ce(K):ce(L1):ce(2):ce(M) exp = 76 {I5}: 14.0 {I28}: <31: 5.3 {I8} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 386.92 {I5} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=24.0 {I15}: 3.7 {I3}:<5.9:0.60 {I15}:1.61 {I20}:<1.9 (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.11 {I1}, L1/L2=6.2 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 477.98 {I7} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp= <20.9:2.62 {I20}:0.43 {I6}: 0.17 {I2}:0.87 {I10}: <0.21 (1967Jo06). L1/L2=6.1 {I10}, L1/L3=15.4 {I22} 
RI Other: 347 {I35} from ce data fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 487.58 {I7} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp= 3.27 {I20}:0.62 {I10}:0.31 {I15}:0.18 {I2}:0.18 {I3} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 368.89 {I12} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=2.1 {I5}:0.33 {I8}:0.13 {I5} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.081 {I20}, L1/L2=2.5 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other: 525.75 {I8} (1967Jo06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.067 {I20} and |a(L12)exp=0.012 {I3} (deduced from ce data ce(K):ce(L12):ce(M) exp = 3.4 {I3}:0.60 {I7}: 0.13 {I2} (1967Jo06)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 408.20 {I12} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(M) exp=4.0 {I4}:0.79 {I9}:0.33 {I6}:0.31 {I6} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.074 {I12}, L1/L2=2.4 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 565.06 {I7} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(M) exp=0.83 {I9}:0.18 {I3}:0.11 {I3}:0.12 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.021 {I6}, obtained from 496.1 keV ce line observed by 1967Jo06 with Ice=0.21 {I4} and assigning it to K conversion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Other: 446.55 {I15} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L12) exp=1.73 {I20}:0.30 {I5}, and |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Other: 467.06 {I8} (1967Jo06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3}, |a(L12)exp=0.012 {I3} (deduced value using ce data ce(K):ce(L12) = 3.5 {I5}:0.53 {I8} of 1967Jo06 and I|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(206|g)/I|g(353|g)=0.45 {I9} in adopted gammas. 
M |a(K)exp=0.56 for the doublet is compatible with assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E Other: 353.91 {I12} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M) exp= 6.0 {I6}:1.56 {I15}:1.37 {I15}:0.89 {I15}:0.46 {I15} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other: 495.72 {I12} (1967Jo06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3}, |a(L12)exp=0.0106 {I22}, |a(M)exp=0.0046 {I23} - (deduced using ce data ce(K):ce(L12):ce(M)=2.7 {I3}: 0.36 {I4}: 0.16 {I3} of 1967Jo06 and I|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 701.93 {I10} (1967Jo06) and 701.96 {I12} (1976Pi06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.030 {I10}, |a(L12)exp=0.0059 {I21} using ce(K):ce(L12) = 0.97 {I10}:0.19 {I4} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Other: 732.40 {I25} (1967Jo06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I6} from ce(K):ce(L12) = 0.14 {I2}:<0.10 (1967Jo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 210.05 {I8} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR From ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(M) exp=19.4 {I20}:4.0 {I5}:0.57 {I15}:2.6 {I5} (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.55 {I7}, L1/L2=7.0 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 713.81 {I6} (1967Jo06) and 413.73 {I5} (1976Pi06). 
M,MR from ce(K):ce(L12):ce(L3):ce(M):ce(N) exp=19.4 {I10}:<20.9: 0.29 {I4}:1.7 {I3}: <1.4 (1967Jo06). |a(K)=0.089 {I7}, |a(L3)=0.0013 {I2}, |a(M)=0.0078 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E Uncertainty increased from 1976Pi06 value (499.62 {I5}); outlier in level energy fit, original uncertainty appeared to be incompatible with the complexity of the energy spectrum in the region. A closer E|g=502.09 {I15} in 1967Jo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E Other: 586.46 {I8} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L12):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=5.2 {I5}:0.77 {I7}:0.064 {I20}: <0.4 (1967Jo06); ce(N)=0.19 {I4} discarded, outlier in ce data fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 620.15 {I12} (1967Jo06). 
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.025 {I3} (ce(K):ce(L12):ce(L3):ce(M) exp=1.57 {I15}:0.36 {I4}:0.12 {I3} (1967Jo06)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E Other: 674.21 {I8} (1967Jo06). 
M from ce(K):ce(L12):ce(L3):ce(M) exp =1.74 {I15}:0.22 {I3}:<0.06:0.09 {I2} (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E Quoted value is the level energy difference, which disagrees with doublet energy (451.85 {I5} keV - 1976Pi06), and was not included in the level energies fit. Placement from 1976Pi06 |g-|g coincidence measurement. Other: 451.87 {I10} (1967Jo06). 
RI For doublet with 451.85|g, placed from 451 keV level 
M same as for the |g from 451.83 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Other: 625.93 {I20} (1967Jo06) 
E2+M1, |d=0.73 {I23}, from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I6} (1967Jo06). Inconsistent with 1976Pi06 placement on level scheme from |g-|g coinc measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Other: 659.63 {I25} (1967Jo06) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I7} and |a(L12)exp=0.0034 {I11} using ce(K):ce(L12) exp =0.31 {I5}:0.057 {I10} (1967Jo06) |a(K)=0.018 {I3}, |a(L12)=0.0034 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 561.90 {I17} (1967Jo06) and 561.59 {I14} (1976Pi06). 
M$ form |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3} from ce(K)=0.32 {I4} (1967Jo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 920.96 {I25} (1967Jo06) and 920.66 {I25} (1976Pi06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.013 {I6} from ce(K)=0.65 {I15} (coin with other lines) (1967Jo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E Other: 627.61 {I20} (1967Jo06). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.057 {I22} and |a(L12)exp=0.010 {I5} from ce(K):ce(L12)=0.68 {I7}: 0.12 {I3} (1967Jo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
I{-e}exp=4.8 (1977Ke18) for 310.5 L + 380.3 K shells. 
RI contains an unplaced component, with I|g=6, whose assignment to {+191}Pt is uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M Main component not M1 (1977Ke18). I{-e}exp=0.4 for 430.3 K + 432 K (not assigned). |a(K)(theory) for E2 or E1 using I|g gives I{-e}=0.3 or 0.12, respectively, favours E2. However, |g(|q) data is consistent with a |DJ=0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 19.30 {I13} from |e decay and 18.61 {I26} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d). Others: 14 {I3} from (|a,xn|g), 17.4 {I15} from (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR other |d: |>4.5 from |a(K)exp in {+192}Au |e decay; 6.5 {I+10-7} from |a(K)exp (1974Vo13) in |b{+-} decay; +7 {I2} in (|a,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 14.0 {I13} in |e decay, 39 {I14} in (|a,xn|g), 8.0 {I15} in Coulomb excitation, 28 {I3} in (p,2n|g). 
Other |d: +6 {I2} in (|a,xn|g), 3.9 {I+7-14} in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 580.80 {I8} from (p,2n|g), 580.88 {I12} from (|a,2n|g) and 580.9 {I2} from ({+11}B,p4n|g). Other E|g: 585 in {+198}Pt({+136}Xe,X|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 176.98 {I4} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d), 176.84 {I8} from |e decay and 176.8 {I3} from (p,2n|g). 
RI weighted average of 8.1 {I19} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d), 11.3 {I11} from |e decay and 10 {I2} from (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 593.38 {I5}, 594.0 {I3} and 593.5 {I3} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d), 593.46 {I4} from |e decay and 593.39 {I12} from (p,2n|g) (weighted average is 593.43 {I5}). 
RI weighted average of 79.1 {I19} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d), 81.7 {I27} from |e decay and 72 {I8} from (p,2n|g). 
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |g-ray linear polarization (oriented nuclei) in |b{+-} decay (73.829 d) and |a(K)exp in Au |e decay. Other: 0.11 {I+5-11} from |a(K)exp in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 765.8 {I3} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d), 765.6 {I2} from |e decay and 765.7 {I3} from (p,2n|g). 
RI from |e decay. Others: 2.5 {I11} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d) and 18 {I4} from (p,2n|g). 
M,MR from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1061.49 {I4} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d), 1061.62 {I4} from |e decay and 1061.46 {I15} from (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
B(E3)(W.u.): from measured B(E3)|^=0.17 {I3} in Coulomb excitation. Other B(E3)|^: 0.19 from (|a,|a'). 
E unweighted average of 1378.0 {I2}, 1378.2 {I3}, 1378.8 {I10}, 1378.0 {I5}, 1379.0 {I5} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d) and 1378.0 {I2} from |e decay (weighted average is 1378.16 {I15}). 
Other I|g: 2.3 {I6} from |b{+-} decay (73.829 d). 
M K/L consistent with E3, but |a(K)exp favors E2 in {+192}Ir |b{+-} decay (73.829 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
K/L=2.0 {I3}, L1/L2=0.76 {I8}, (L1+L2)/L3=3.1 {I4} (1966Ny01). 
E 316.50 {I3} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K/L=2.4 {I6}, L1/L2=0.7 {I1}, (L1+L2)/L3=3.6 {I9} (1966Ny01); |a(K)exp=0.066 {I11}. 
E 295.94 {I3} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 
RI weighted average of 38.5 {I5} (1972Fi12), 38.8 {I5} (2008Mc04). 
MR 2.5 {I+6-4} from ce data in {+192}Au |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
K/L=3.1 {I5} (1966Ny01). 
E 612.50 {I4} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 
RI weighted average of 7.48 {I6} (1972Fi12), 7.46 {I10} (2008Mc04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K/L=2.1 {I7}, (L1+L2)/L3=5.1 {I7} (1966Ny01); |a(K)exp=0.055 {I9}. 
E 308.45 {I2} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 
RI weighted average of 5.94 {I10} (1972Fi12), 6.05 {I15} (2008Mc04). 
Other |d: |>4.9 from |a(K)exp in {+192}Au |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K/L1=3.7 {I8} (1966Ny01), |a(K)exp=0.021 {I4}. 
E 604.43 {I2} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 
MR 1.2 {I+4-3} from |a(K)exp; K/L1 appears to be incorrect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|>0.20 {I3} from I|g<0.10 in 1972Fi12. 
TI approximate value deduced from Ice(K) and theoretical K/L ratios for E0 transitions (1969Ha61). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.015 {I3}. 
E 588.66 {I5} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 
Other I|g: 0.51 {I3} (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 884.7 {I1} (2008Mc04) from Au |e decay. 
RI deduced from I|g(416.5), I|g(588.6), and relative photon branching from 1201 level in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 517.80 {I20} (0.70 {I10}) (1972Fi12) for doubly-placed |g. 
Placement from 2257 rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.035 {I8}. 
CC based on |a(K)exp. 
Other E|g (I|g): 826.72 {I17} (0.11 {I1}) (1972Fi12). 
Placement from a 3360 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|>0.060 {I10} from I|g|<0.12 (1972Fi12). 
E from 1966Ny01. 
TI deduced from Ice(K) and theoretical K/L ratios for E0 transitions (1969Ha61). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.070 {I8} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.028 {I8}; exceeds |a(K)(M1), implying E0 component. However, E2 is expected from Adopted Levels, Gammas. 
Placement from 2423 rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I7}; |a(K)exp consistent with some M1 admixture, but level scheme is not. 
Other data: E|g=1313.14 {I20} (1966Ny01); I|g=0.74 {I2} (1972Fi12). 
Placement from 2891 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.41 {I14}; implies large E0 component, unless ce line is contaminated or misidentified. 
Placement from a 3146 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0063 {I14}. 
Placement from an 1189 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 
Other I|g: 0.21 {I1} (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.17 {I1} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I14} suggests E2 assignment, inconsistent with adopted J|p(2041 level). 
Placement from 2835 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0018 {I7}; favors E2, but E1 cannot be ruled out. Level scheme implies |D|p=(yes). 
Placement from 2629 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other data: E|g=1263.8 {I2} (1972Fi12), 1264.2 {I4} (1966Ny01); I|g=0.046 {I9} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0072 {I21} implies M1. However, E(ce) is high, suggesting ce line may be contaminated; if so, |a(K)exp will be an overestimate. The level scheme implies E2. 
Placement from 2453 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 1198.0 {I7} (0.17 {I4}) (1970Pl09). 
Placement from a 1514 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I5}. Possibly overestimated; E(ce) is high suggesting ce line may include 1519|g. E1 and E2 assignments possible. 
KC(E1)=0.00086, KC(E2)=0.0020. 
Other data: E|g=1517.8 {I3} (1966Ny01); I|g=0.22 {I2} (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I4}; it is unclear whether the 1812|g contributes to the reported I(ce). E2 appears most likely, but is inconsistent with adopted level scheme. 
KC(E1)=0.00064, KC(E2)=0.00148. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00047 {I16}; |a(K)exp implies mult=E1, inconsistent with mult(1518|g) which deexcites the same level as this |g. 
KC(E1)=0.00049, KC(E2)=0.00111. 
Other I|g: 0.61 {I15} (1970Pl09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 1241.8 (0.05 {I3}) (1970Pl09); poorly resolved |g. 
Placement from 2423 rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other data: E|g=476.95 {I20} (1966Ny01), 477.16 {I20} (1972Fi12); I|g=1.86 {I19} (1972Fi12), are presumably for a different or contaminated |g. |a(K)exp=0.035 {I8} implies M1+E2 for that line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from 1972Fi12; I|g=0.33 {I2} from 2008Mc04. 
M |a(K)exp=0.047 {I14} for probable multiplet dominated by this transition exceeds |a(K)(M1). However, level scheme implies pure mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 1036.4 {I6} (0.6 {I1}) (1970Pl09). 
Placement from a 1353 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00148 {I26} for doublet, assuming 1966Ny01 failed to resolve the 2234.8|g. This exceeds |a(K)(E2). 
Other E|g: 2236.89 {I20} (1966Ny01). 
Other I|g: 9.6 {I10} (1970Pl09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I9}; suggests possible E0 component. 
E from 1966Ny01; 1683.5 {I3} from 2008Mc04. 
Other I|g: 0.22 {I2} (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I11}; a little high for, but not inconsistent with, the pure E2 multipolarity required by the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Complex, with at least 2 unresolved peaks in ce spectrum; 1966Ny01 suggested second placement from 2614.6 level. |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I7} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from 1972Fi12. Other: 3.3 {I2} (2008Mc04). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I4}, K/L=5.7 {I6} (1966Ny01). 
Placement from a 2909 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.37 {I1} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.016 {I3}. 
Placement from a 3360 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.52 {I3} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0052 {I10}. 
Placement from a 2676 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.66 {I2} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0068 {I19}. 
Placement from a 2201 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.010 {I4}. 
Other E|g: 969.3 {I4} (1972Fi12), 969.7 {I3} (1966Ny01). 
Other I|g: 0.130 {I25} (1972Fi12), 0.08 {I3} (1970Pl09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0068 {I18} for doublet; unresolved from 1207.22|g in ce spectrum. |a(K)exp favors M1, but level scheme suggests E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0008 {I3}; probably E2, but E1 and M1 cannot be ruled out. 
Other I|g: 0.27 {I7} (1970Pl09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.022 {I5}. 
Other I|g: 0.35 {I2} (1972Fi12) for doublet. 
Placement from a 3146 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0060 {I21}. 
Placement from 3156 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 
Other I|g: 0.11 {I1} (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 1308.1 {I7} (0.15 {I5}) (1970Pl09). 
Placement from a 1308 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.35 {I10} for broad peak (1970Pl09). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I4} (mult=(E2,M1)). 
Placement from a 3146 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 769.83 {I10} (1966Ny01) 
M |a(K)exp=0.24 {I6}; much greater than |a(K)(M1). 
Placement from 2048 and 3146 levels rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.026 {I6} for probable doublet, >>|a(K)(M1); however, level scheme implies E2 for this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I5}. 
Other I|g: 0.72 {I15} (1970Pl09) for possible doublet. 
Placement from 2757 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 2408 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 
M |a(K)exp=0.024 {I7}; greatly exceeds |a(K)(M1). 1966Ny01 do not report the 1224.9|g; possibly it contributes to their E=1226.4 {I5} ce line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I6}. 
Other E|g: 2296.5 {I8} (1970Pl09). 
Placement from a 2909 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2614 level shown in table I of 2008Mc04 is incorrect according to an e-mail reply from Dr. McCutchan on July 28, 2008. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 1.01 {I15} (1970Pl09). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I3}. 
Placement from a 2952 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0098 {I24}. 
Other I|g: 0.08 {I1} (1972Fi12). 
Placement from a 1308 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0051 {I16}. 
Other E|g (I|g): 1352.9 {I3}, 1353.16 {I20} (0.10 {I1}) (1972Fi12); 1353.4 {I9} (0.13 {I5}) (1970Pl09). 
Placement from a 1353 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} for doublet. 
Other I|g: 0.10 {I1} (1972Fi12). 
Placements from 2238 and 2408 levels rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.23 {I2} (1972Fi12). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0074 {I14}. 
Placement from a 2857 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00069 {I17} for multiplet. 
Other I|g: 0.80 {I22} for poorly resolved 2243.3|g+2246.6|g, each with I|g=0.40 {I15} in 1970Pl09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI E|g=997.07 {I20} (I|g=0.33 {I2}) in 1972Fi12 may be associated with 996.3|g or 997.7|g in 1966Ny01, or both. 
M |a(K)exp=0.014 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 0.16 {I4} (1970Pl09) for E|g=1097.4 {I7}. 
Placement from 2375 or a 3146 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I8}; implies M1, but this is inconsistent with placement of 997|g and 2575|g from same level as this |g. 
Other I|g: 0.15 {I7} (1970Pl09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=906.8, I|g=0.13 {I4} for doublet in 1970Pl09. Placements from a 2952 and a 3360 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 1180.3 {I3} (1966Ny01). 
M |a(K)exp=0.10 {I4}; possibly ce line is complex (E|g seems a little low). 
Placement from 2375 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.016 {I4}. 
Placements from 1133 and 2891 levels rejected by 2008Mc04. 
Other I|g: 0.08 {I1} (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.036 {I10}; greatly exceeds |a(K)(M1). 
Placement from an 1133 level rejected by 2008Mc04. 
Other E|g (I|g): 1132.55 {I23} (0.070 {I15}) (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.041 {I10}; exceeds |a(K)(M1). 
Placements from 1514 and 1823 levels rejected by 2008Mc04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other data: E|g=1291.20 {I25}, I|g=0.15 {I1} (1972Fi12). However, it is unclear how this line is related to E|g=1289.7 {I8} and 1292.6 {I5} in ce data from 1966Ny01. If it corresponds to the latter, |a(K)exp(1292)=0.014 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I11} for doublet ce spectrum. 
Other E|g (I|g): 1580.0 {I3} (0.90 {I5}) for doublet (1972Fi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 100 in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
K:L:M=100:50:18; |a(L)exp=0.027 {I8}. 
A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 74.0 {I4} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(K)exp=0.021 {I7}; K:L:M=48:10:2.7. 
A{-2}=+0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M adopted T{-1/2} and RUL exclude |D|p=yes option from |g(|q). 
A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 15.5 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(K)exp=0.013 {I4}; K/L=3.4. 
A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI 42.5 {I3} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I14}, K/L=8.2 from (|a,4n|g); |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I17} from (|a,2n|g). 
A{-2}=-0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 11.1 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(L)exp=0.078 {I24} from (|a,2n|g). 
A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI 1.8 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (1976Hj01). 
M favored by intensity balance at 1365 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI 8.6 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(K)exp=0.089 {I27}; K:L:M=76:10:5 from (|a,2n|g). 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I2} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.010 {I3}; K:L:M=37:10:1.5 from (|a,4n|g). 
A{-2}=+0.36 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI 0.8 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(L+...)exp=3.9 {I12} from (|a,4n|g). 
M from |a(L+...)exp, deduced from intensity balance at 2172 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI 1.0 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
M (Q) from |g(|q), not M2 from RUL; E2 favored by intensity balance. 
A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.13 {I4}, mean value from (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g); K/L=4.9 from (|a,2n|g). 
A{-2}=-0.82 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I6} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 3.4 {I2} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
|a(K)exp=0.018 {I6}, K/L>3 from (|a,4n|g). 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.03 for 564.9|g and 565.8|g combined (from (|a,4n|g)). 
A{-2}=+0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1976Hj01) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E 40.4 {I3} from level energy difference. 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce)(104.7|g)=24.6, I(|g+ce)(40.4|g)/I(|g+ce)(104.7|g)<0.0013 (1978Ti02), and |a(E2 theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 0.3 {I1} in (|a,2n|g) at 27 MeV (2006Le06). 
M Q from |g(|q), not M2 from T{-1/2} and RUL. 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I10} (1976Hj01); A{-2}=+0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I6} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.03 from (|a,4n|g); this allows mult=E2 or E1. 
A{-2}=+0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1976Hj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios, |g|g(|q). 
K/L=2.2 {I1}, (L1+L2)/L3=3.15 {I20} (1966Sc20); L/(L+M+)=1.75 {I5} (1983Ha34); L1:L2:L3=1.303 {I13}:1.928 {I15}:1 (1967Ka04,1968Ni07); L1:L2:L3=100 {I1}:149 {I1}:75.8 {I9} (1964He19); L:M:N+=4.2 {I4}:1:0.29 (1968Bo01); M1:M2:M3=175 {I9}:285 {I14}:151 {I7} (1967Dr03); N1/N3=1.055 {I32} (1971HeZA); O/N=0.149 {I8} (1957Ke01); K/L1=7.58 {I12}, L1:L2:L3=1.28 {I2}:1.90 {I3}:1 (1974Vo13). 
%I|g=82.84 {I12} assuming proposed decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M E0 admixture not found (1969Ma14,1971Do12,1973Al27). 
MR$other data: +7.1 {I3} (|g|g(|q), 1987Me14), +10 {I+3-2} (|g|g|g(|q), 1975Pa23), +8.8 {I3} (|g|g(|q), 1974He08), +5.4 {I2} (|gce(|q), 1974Vo13), +7.4 {I2} (|g|g(|q), 1974YaZK), +6 {I+3-1} (|g(|q,t), 1970Hi12), +5.6 {I+15-11} (|gce(|q), 1970Hi02), +9.1 {I+17-27} (|g|g(|q), 1969Gr19), +15 {I+10-5} (|g(|q,t), 1969Re06). 
|a(K)exp=0.0678 {I16}; K/L=2.2 {I2}, (L1+L2)/L3=3.3 {I2} (1966Sc20); M1:M2:M3=215 {I11}:374 {I19}:217 {I15} (1967Dr03); L1/L3=1.307 {I15} (1971HeZA); K/L1=7.32 {I13}, L1:L2:L3=1.32 {I3}:1.91 {I3}:1 (1974Vo13); K/L3=8.90 {I5} (1969Ma14); K/M=8.9 {I2} (1957Ke01,1957Ke66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp and from |g|g(|q), nuclear orientation (1969Re06). |a(K)exp=0.0123 {I54} (1966Sc20); |a(M)exp=5.9|*10{+-4} {I5} (1967Dr03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios below, and from |g|g(|q), nuclear orientation (1969Re06). 
K/L=3.7 {I3}, (L1+L2)/L3=5.3 {I3} (1966Sc20); K/L1=7.20 {I16}, L1:L2:L3=3.10 {I7}:2.33 {I8}:1, |a(K)exp=0.0211 {I8} (1974Vo13); |a(M)exp=1.55|*10{+-3} {I9} (1967Dr03); L:M:N+=4.3 {I5}:1:0.3 (1968Bo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 136.38 {I10} (1966Sc20), 136.39 {I4} (1973Ge05), 136.36 {I30} (1988Li06). 
MR $others: 2.0 {I3} (from |a(K)exp=0.80 {I8}), 3.7 {I3} (from K/L), 1.65 {I7} (from L1/L3), 1.53 {I5} (from L1/L2). 
|a(K)exp=0.74 {I11} (1966Sc20); |a(K)exp=0.80 {I8}; K/L=0.75 {I3} (1960Ma17); L1:L2:L3=100:210 {I10}:170 {I10} (1957Ke01,1957Ke66); (L1+L2)/L3=1.7 {I2} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other data: +6.9 {I5} (|g|g(|q), 1987Me14), +8.1 {I+14-10} (|g|g(|q), 1974He08), +8.0 {I6} (|g|g(|q), 1974YaZK), +7.1 {I6} (|g(|q,t), 1970Hi12), +6.3 {I+6-5} (|g|g(|q), 1970Be08), +9.9 {I10} (|g|g(|q), 1969Gr19), +8 {I2} (|g|g(|q), 1969Kh04), +7.3 {I2} (|g(|q,t), 1969Re06), 6.5 {I+10-7} from |a(K)exp in 1974Vo13. 
|a(K)exp=0.0627 {I16}, K/L=2.2 {I1}, (L1+L2)/L3=3.13 {I20} (1966Sc20); M1:M2:M3=100:169 {I5}:87 {I4} (1957Ke01,1957Ke66); L1/L3=1.396 {I18} (1971HeZA); |a(K)exp=0.0611 {I10}, K/L1=7.25 {I17}, L1:L2:L3=1.30 {I5}:1.86 {I6}:1 (1974Vo13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR other data: -1.2 {I1} (|g|g(|q), 1987Me14), -1.90 {I9} (|g|g(|q), 1974He08), -1.2 {I1} (|g|g(|q), 1974YaZK), -2.5 {I2} (|g|g(|q), 1970Be08), -3.0 {I+9-12} (|gce(|q), 1970Se08), -2.0 {I2} (|g|g(|q), 1969Gr19), -1.5 {I1} (|g(|q,t), 1970Hi12), -3.3 {I+4-7} (|gce(|q), 1970Hi02), -1.5 {I1} (|g(|q,t), 1969Re06), 1.40 {I8} (from |a(K)exp). 
|a(K)exp=0.0213 {I6} (1966Sc20); K/L=4.7 {I1} (1957Ke01,1957Ke66); K/L1=6.6 {I3}, L1:L2:L3=11.5 {I15}:3.4 {I4}:1 (1974Vo13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 280.03 {I5} (1969LeZU) and 280.51 {I15} (1988Li06); other: 280 {I1} (1966Sc20). 
RI based on I|g=0.0099 {I6} (1988Li06) and I|g<0.005 (1985Ei01). Other I|g: 0.030 {I2} (1986Me07). 
MR from |a(K)exp. 
|a(K)exp=0.32 {I23} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q) (1987Me14). Other values: +11 {I+5-2} (|g|g(|q) and |g linear polarization (oriented nuclei), 1985Ri13), +7 {I+4-3} (|g|g(|q), 1974He08), +3.1 {I14} (|g|g(|q), 1974YaZK), -4 -7+3 (|g(|q,t), 1970Hi12), 3.9 {I+7-14} from |a(K)exp. |d from (L1+L2)/L3 is consistent with pure E2. 
|a(K)exp=0.0324 {I22}, K/L=3.7 {I5}, (L1+L2)/L3=4.7 {I5} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q), nuclear orientation (1969Re06) and |a(K)exp; <6% M3 admixture (|g|g(|q), 1974SiZC). 
|a(K)exp=0.0135 {I10} (1974Vo13), 0.014 {I4}(1966Sc20); K/L=3.8 {I5} (1970Wi08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from 1969LeZU. Other: 177.01 (1988Li06, uncertainty 0.03 to 0.3). (1988Li06). 
RI weighted average of 0.0048 {I15} (1988Li06) and 0.006 {I2} (1985Ei01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 593.38 {I5} (1973Ge05), 594.0 {I3} (1985Ei01), 593.5 {I3} (1988Li06). 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1062.0 {I4} (1966Sc20), 1061.48 {I4} (1973Ge05), 1061.6 {I5} (1985Ei01), 1061.46 {I30} (1988Li06). 
MR other value: <0.055 (|g|g(|q), 1975MiZM). 
|a(K)exp=0.00200 {I9}, K/L=6.6 {I4} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 1379.0 {I5} (1966Sc20), 1378.0 {I5} (1973Ge05), 1378.8 {I10} (1985Ei01), 1378.2 {I3} (1988Li06) (weighted average is 1378.35 {I22}). 
M K/L implies E3, but |a(K)exp favors E2 over E3. 
|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4}, K/L=5.2 {I4} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placed by evaluator; transition not resolved from 484.6|g (in {+192}Os), but known from {+192}Au |e decay and (particle,xn|g) reactions. 
E from Adopted Gammas. 
RI deduced from I(1090|g) here and I(485|g):I(1090|g)=100 {I8}:24.6 {I23} from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1090.5 {I4} (1966Sc20), 1089.9 {I8} (1973Ge05), 1090.3 {I5} (1985Ei01), 1089.55 {I30} (1988Li06). 
MR from |a(K)exp. 
|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I7}, K/L=6.4 {I5} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
CC$From Bricc. Note 1.642 keV 2 |g energy is within 1 keV to the N1-shell binding energy of 0.723 keV. Others: 12000 (1991Ba63), 4010 (1978Ro21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$From Bricc. Note 1.642|g is within 1 keV to the N1-shell binding energy of 0.723 keV. Others: 12000 (1991Ba63), 4010 (1978Ro21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E from 1968Sv01 
M |a(K)exp=135 {I11} (measured I(x ray)/I|g (1976Sa22)); K/L=0.198 {I15}, L1/L2=4.6 {I4}, L1/L3=0.46 {I3} (1968Sv01); theory: |a(K)(M4)=137, K/L=0.26, L1/L2=4.40, L1/L3=0.466. Others: K:L1:L2:L3=58:48:15:100 (1962Ha24); K:L1:L3:(M+N)=10:14:29:15 (1957Ew34). 
Competing crossover transition not seen (1957Ew34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M N1/N2=5.5 {I15}, N2/N3>3, N1/O1=1.5 {I5} (1968Sv01) 
CC From BRICC. Others: 12000 (1991Ba63), 4010 (1978Ro21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced from Ice(M1)=2550 {i330} (1968Sv01)*0.29=740 {I95} and |a(M1)=83.5 {I12} (Bricc) 
M,MR From M1/M2=7.0 {I10}, M2/M3=3.8 {I10} (1968Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR From K/L=1.1 {I4}, L1/L2=0.68 {I4}, L1/L3=0.86 {I7} (1968Sv01) 
RI$From Ice(K)/|a(K)(Bricc). Ice(K)=59 {i9} (1968Sv01)*0.29=17.1 {I2}.6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR From K/L12=3.9 {I5}, L1/L2=3.34 {I15}, L1/M1=3.6 {I7} (1968Sv01) 
RI$From Ice(K)/|a(K)(Bricc). Ice(K)=980 {i60} (1968Sv01)*0.29=284 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=3.3 {I7}. Ice(K)=312 {i20}*0.29=90 {I6}. Also K/(L1+L3)=5.1 {I10}, L1/L3=3.4 {I6}, M1/M2=2.1 {I5} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=2.7 {I7}. Ice(K)=57.9 {i45}*0.29=16.8 {I13}. Also K/L1=5.6 {I25}, L1/L2>3.1, L1/M1=4.9 {I21} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(L1)=27.9 {i25} (1968Sv01)*0.29=8.1 {I7} and |a(L1)=2.0 (Bricc). 
M From L1/L2=8.7 {I15} (1968Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M From L1/L2=10.5 {I10}, L1/L3>25 (1968Sv01). 
RI$From Ice(L1)=69 {i6} (1968Sv01)*0.29=20 {I2} and |a(L1)=8.83 {I13} (Bricc). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=3.1 {I5}. Ice(K)=205 {i15}*0.29=59 {I4}. Also K/L12=5.2 {I11}, L1/L2=9.7 {I15} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.11 {I2}. Ice(K)=7.1 {i7}*0.29=2.1 {I2}. Also K/M=7.1 {I20} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.15 {I3}. Ice(K)=9.5 {i11}*0.29=2.8 {I3}. Also K/L23=1.5 {I5}, L2/L3=2.4 {I11}, L1/L3<1.5 (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From (Ice(L)/|a(L). Where (Ice(L)=L1+L2+L3=45.5 {i41}*0.29=13.2 {I12}. 
M,MR From L1/L2=8.4 {I8}, L1/L3>27 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=1.4 {I3}. Ice(K)=58.5 {i40}*0.29=17.0 {I12}. Also K/L12=5.3 {I9}, L1/L2=10.9 {I20}, L1/L3>5 (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.35 {I4} (Ice(K)=283 {i15}*0.29=82 {I4}). Also Also K/L=4.8 {I2}, L1/L2=6.6 {I16}, L1/L3=20 {I6} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.216 {I10} (Ice(K)=100*0.29=29). Also K/L=4.8 {I22}, L1/L2=1.5 {I7}, L1/L3=2.5 {I13} (1968Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.093 {I22} (Ice(K)=9.3 {i9}*0.29=2.7 {I3}). Also K/L3=6.2 {I14} (1968Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.29 {I9} (Ice(K)=12 {i3} (1968Sv01)*0.29=3.5 {I9}). Also K/L12=7.5 {I38}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.107 {I9} (Ice(K)=24.5 {i10} (1968Sv01)*0.29=7.1 {I3}). Also K/L12=5.7 {I6}, K/L3>29 (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(L1)/|a(L1). Where Ice(L1)=11.0 {I16} (1968Sv01)*0.29=3.2 {I5} and |a(L1)=5.47 {I8}. 
M From L1/L2=8 {I4}, L1/L3>10 (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.37 {I10} (Ice(K)=3.5 {i5}*0.29=1.01 {I14}). Also L1/L2>1, L1/L3=1.25 {I75} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.36 {I16} (Ice(K)=8.8 {i10}*0.29=2.55 {I29}). Also K/L1=11 {I6}, L1/L2>1 (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.112 {I20} (Ice(K)=6.8 {i8}*0.29=1.97 {I23}). Also K/L=3.8 {I11}, L1/L2=2.4 {I7}, L1/L3=11 {I4} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.085 {I20} (Ice(K)=4.7 {i7}*0.29=1.36 {I20}). Also K/L=4.4 {I15}, L12/L3=7 {I4} (1968Sv01). From L12/L3 ratio, the |g is mainly E2; too high |a(K)exp seems to indicate that perhaps the I|g(477.0) and I|g(478.4) were not correctly resolved. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.072 {I23} (Ice(K)=2.0 {i5}*0.29=0.58 {I15}). Also K/L12=5.6 {I25}, L12/L3>0.7 (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=Ice(K)/I|g=0.08 {I4} (Ice(K)=1.3 {i5}*0.29=0.38 {I15}). Also K/L12=4.5 {I19} (1968Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 328.467 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 328.470 {I6} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 328.45 {I3} from (n,n'|g). Others: 328.5 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d), 328.5 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), and 328.5 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 293.544 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 293.549 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 293.55 {I7} from (|a,2n|g), 293.50 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 293.5 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I11} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 100 {I6} from (|a,2n|g), 100 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 1.0E2 {I5} from muonic atom 
MR$for |d(E2/M1), from |g|g(|q) in {+194}Au |e decay 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.00046 {I16} (1999Wo07 evaluation). 
$E0/E2 mixing ratio(q)=-0.17 to +0.24 with penetration parameter (|l)=-170 to +270 (1971Do12). 
CC$for E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 622.003 {I20} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 622.010 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 621.8 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), 622.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g), and 622.0 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$weighted average of 13.40 {I16} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 13.85 {I12} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 19 {I6} from (|a,2n|g), and 12.2 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 482.823 {I13} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 482.6 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d), 482.800 {I8} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 482.75 {I12} from (|a,2n|g), 482.80 {I6} from (n,n'|g), and 482.9 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 300.751 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 300.74 {I8} from (|a,2n|g), 300.74 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 300.6 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I11} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 100 {I7} from (|a,2n|g), and 100 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 594.288 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 594.299 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 594.3 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) and 594.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 18.87 {I30} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 18.58 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 14 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) and 11.3 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$11.3 {I9} from (n,n'|g) not used in averaging. 
MR >+50 or <-10 (|g|g(|q) in {+194}Ir |b{+-}). ce data in {+194}Au |e decay give 0.8 {I+6-4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M1))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 418.27 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 418.195 {I23} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 418.2 {I3} from (|a,2n|g), 417.96 {I11} from (n,n'|g), and 418.1 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$weighted average of 16.2 {I22} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 14.3 {I15} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 14 {I4} from (|a,2n|g), and 14.4 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 607.502 {I24} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 607.496 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 607.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), 607.63 {I9} from (n,n'|g), and 607.5 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 100 {I20} from (|a,2n|g), and 100 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 901.077 {I25} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 901.0 {I1} from Coulomb excitation. Others: 900.9 {I6} from (|a,2n|g) and 901.05 {I17} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 10.7 {I4} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 8 {I4} from (|a,2n|g), and 7.2 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 645.169 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 645.164 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 645.16 {I10} from (n,n'|g) and 645.2 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 100.0 {I22} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 938.719 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 938.720 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 938.6 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 50.7 {I15} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 49.7 {I5} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 61 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.337 {I23}, X(E0/E2)=0.0082 {I5}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.00019 {I10} (2005Ki02,evaluation). Other: |r{+2}(E0)=0.00016 {I8} (1999Wo07,evaluation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 562.4 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d), 562.478 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 562.5 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), 562.64 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 562.4 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 600.5 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d), 600.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g), and 600.6 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
M$from ce data in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 499.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), 499.65 {I9} from (n,n'|g), and 499.3 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1093.9 {I2} from (n,n'|g) and 1093.5 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 203.056 {I21} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 202.96 {I5} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 202.8 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 18.7 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 16.61 {I32} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 13.6 {I17} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 621.295 {I36} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 621.250 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 621.8 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 621.4 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 39 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 63 {I31} from (|a,2n|g), and 37.3 {I34} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 810.569 {I18} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 810.533 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 811.0 {I5} from (|a,2n|g), 810.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g), and 811 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$unweighted average of 9.67 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 8.27 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 13 {I6} from (|a,2n|g), and 7.8 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1104.073 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1104.056 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 1104.0 {I3} from (|a,2n|g), 1104.01 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 1104 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 100 {I16} from (|a,2n|g), and 100 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1432.56 {I8} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 
RI$weighted average of 3.33 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 3.27 {I6} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 857.224 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 857.265 {I24} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 0.976 {I13} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 0.69 {I17} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1150.799 {I12} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1150.780 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1150.8 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 100.0 {I11} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 111.7 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 
M$deduced from intensity balance in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 244.769 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 244.798 {I22} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 2.91 {I16} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 3.09 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 589.202 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 589.208 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 589.18 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 45.1 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 43.5 {I4} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 34 {I4} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 700.687 {I20} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 700.675 {I16} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 700.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 8.77 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 9.08 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 44 {I4} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 889.986 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 889.969 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 889.90 {I15} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 17.67 {I18} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 18.08 {I30} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 29.3 {I29} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 
MR$from ce and |g|g(|q) in {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: +1.51 {I40} from |g(|q) in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1183.539 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1183.535 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1183.60 {I12} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 100.0 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 100 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
MR$unweighted average of +1.32 {I9} (1983Ri14) and +0.9 {I1} (1973Si22) from |g(|q) in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and +1.09 {I+18-16} from ce and |g|g(|q) in {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1511.98 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1512.073 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 7.9 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 6.7 {I15} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
$Level-energy difference=1512.998 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 925.269 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 925.251 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 925.5 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 925.3 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$unweighted average of 24.94 {I23} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 26.12 {I26} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 48 {I4} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1218.813 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1218.791 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), 1218.75 {I13} from (n,n'|g), and 1218.8 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 100.0 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$transition seen only in ce data in {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
$ q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.53 {I4}, X(E0/E2)=0.0238 {I18}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.010 {I4} (2005Ki02,evaluation). Other: |r{+2}(E0)=0.011 {I4} (1999Wo07, evaluation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 699.332 {I29} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 699.257 {I18} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$unweighted average of 7.60 {I25} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 8.43 {I23} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1000.173 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1000.190 {I15} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 999.99 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 76.2 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 99 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 76 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1293.723 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1293.708 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1293.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 71.4 {I6} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 73.7 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 91 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
MR$E2/M1 ratio from |g|g(|q) in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). 
CC$from {+194}Au |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 1622.185 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 1622.4 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I11} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 859.396 {I25} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 859.370 {I24} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 4.38 {I20} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1048.655 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1048.633 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1048.55 {I13} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 66.4 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 66.4 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 93 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1342.204 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1342.170 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1342.12 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 100.0 {I19} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1670.680 {I16} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1670.665 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$unweighted average of 14.87 {I13} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 14.00 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1156.48 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1156.550 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1156.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1450.137 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1450.098 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1450.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 61.6 {I24} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 68.6 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 84 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1778.25 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1778.532 {I20} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 9.2 {I8} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 8.19 {I27} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 409.8 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 409.69 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) and ce data in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 364.852 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 364.836 {I6} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 364.8 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 23.45 {I28} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 23.55 {I23} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 69 {I7} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 530.184 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 530.173 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 9.16 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 9.03 {I8} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1175.377 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1175.360 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1175.4 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 31.69 {I28} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 31.52 {I28} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 25.9 {I24} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1468.910 {I10} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1468.904 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1468.99 {I12} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 100.0 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1797.408 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1797.404 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.16 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 8.69 {I8} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 894.07 {I18} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 894.51 {I13} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 113 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1194.529 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 1194.8 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1489.01 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 1488.6 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 217 {I28} from (n,n'|g) 
$Level-energy difference=1488.112 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1565.116 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1565.20 {I8} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1595.802 {I23} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1595.807 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1595.6 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 84.5 {I13} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 91.7 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 93 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1924.327 {I28} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1924.273 {I20} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1924.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio for 514|g, 696|g and 1114|g deduced from T{-1/2}(1926 level) and B(E2) values from 1996Wu07 in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 1007.55 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1007.57 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 27.7 {I32} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 25.89 {I34} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 149 {I15} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1119.118 {I16} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 1118.7 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 27.6 {I5} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 30.1 {I32} from (n,n'|g) 
M$D+Q suggested in ce data ({+194}Au |e decay) is inconsistent with |DJ=2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1308.304 {I40} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1308.331 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1308.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 62.9 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), and 62.2 {I5} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 122 {I14} in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1601.947 {I17} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1601.891 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1601.8 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1675.147 {I24} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1675.188 {I18} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1675.27 {I15} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1421.72 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1421.679 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$unweighted average of 8.3 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 9.75 {I9} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1715.243 {I25} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1715.235 {I16} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1715.2 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 20.0 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 19.75 {I24} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 49 {I5} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2043.727 {I17} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 2043.719 {I15} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 2043.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 562.4 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 
M$from ce data in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1430.95 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 1430.996 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 1431.6 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 100 {I11} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1724.535 {I27} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1724.40 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 79 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1441.733 {I19} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1441.703 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1441.6 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 55.2 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 53.7 {I6} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 62 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1735.272 {I21} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1735.245 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1735.2 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 100.0 {I18} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1463.445 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1463.434 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 100.0 {I11} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1756.93 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1756.998 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 8.1 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 8.67 {I8} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$seen only in ce data in {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=61 {I21}, X(E0/E2)=6.1 {I21} (2005Ki02,evaluation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) and Coulomb excitation. Others: 687.8 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 
M$from ce data in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) with |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1186.408 {I26} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1186.325 {I19} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 56.4 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 54.8 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1487.058 {I14} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1487.102 {I16} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Other: 100.0 {I10} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1780.571 {I18} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1780.543 {I22} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$unweighted average of 26.1 {I4} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 24.1 {I4} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1492.020 {I27} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1492.065 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 41.1 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 42.4 {I5} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1785.631 {I21} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1785.636 {I17} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 2114.099 {I26} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 
RI$unweighted average of 59.2 {I6} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 62.6 {I6} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
M$ce data gives |d(E2/M1)<0.5, |DJ|p requires M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 1512.15 {I21} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1511.6 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I6} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h), 43 {I4} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h), and 32.2 {I34} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 1805.729 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 1805.7 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h). Others: 100.0 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1518.652 {I22} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1518.659 {I14} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 1518.7 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 100.0 {I22} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1812.18 {I7} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1812.228 {I17} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 
RI$weighted average of 33 {I9} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 44.9 {I7} from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Others: 1829.524 {I33} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.18 h) and 1829.4 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 948.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+194}Au |e decay (38.02 h). Other: 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$seen in ce data, with intensity deduced from measured I(ceL) and theoretical |a(L1)=2.35 assuming Mult=M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$ce data in {+194}Au |e decay (30.02 h) suggests M3, which disagrees with E2 expected from J|p=2+ for 2397 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 338.8 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d). Others: 100 {I16} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I11} from ({+82}Se,X|g) 
M$from ce data in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d); |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) consistent with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 390.8 {I5} from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 
RI$from {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d). Other: 63 {I19} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (171 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). |g also reported in ({+82}Se,X|g) and ({+209}Bi,X|g) 
M$|g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) consistent with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g of the doublet=70 {I4} divided in two equal parts that is roughly consistent with the coincidence intensities and intensity balance 
$|a(K)exp for the doublet consistent with E1 and E2 assignments for the two components 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 328.50 {I3} (1974HeYW), 328.464 {I6} (1996TeZW), 328.481 {I10} (2015Do06), and 328.50 {I3} (1960Ba17). Others: 328.47 {I15} (1970Be30) and 328.5 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 100.0 {I13} (1996TeZW), 100 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 100 {I5} (1964Be23) 
M$L1:L2:L3=1.53 {I18}:1.96 {I20}:1.00 (1970Ag05); M1:M2:M3=1.25 {I25}:1.87 {I34}:1.00 (1970Ag05); |a(K)exp=0.0505 {I20} (1965Le17), 0.0409 {I22} (1960De17), 0.056 {I6} (1956Th11); |a(K)exp=0.10 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.057 {I10}, |a(M)=0.008 {I4} (1949St17). 
$Ice(K)=100 used to obtain I|g values of transitions where only ce data are available. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 293.548 {I7} (1996TeZW), 293.548 {I10} (2015Do06), and 293.58 {I3} (1974HeYW). Others: 293.55 {I4} (1960Ba17) 293.53 {I4} (1960De15), and 293.57 {I15} (1970Be30) 
RI$weighted average of 18.1 {I6} (1964Be23), 17.5 {I9} (1970Be30), 16.6 {I9} (1974HeYW), 17.5 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 17.24 {I17} (2015Do06). Other: 18.9 {I13} (1971Vi15) 
M$L1:L2:L3=1.19 {I8}:1.90 {I12}:1.00 (1970Ag05); M1:M2:M3=1.2 {I4}:1.8 {I6}:1.0 (1970Ag05); |a(K)exp=0.062 {I7} (1956Th11), 0.034 {I5} (1949St17), 0.065 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.067 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.071 {I6} (1971Vi15); |a(L)exp=0.017 {I7} (1949St17), K/L=1.89 {I20} (1960Ba17). 
MR$from |g|g(|q): average of +16 {I2} (1996TeZW) and +14.3 {I21} (1971Kr01). Others: +30 {I+11-39} (|g|g(|q),1969Ha43); >4.5 from L- and M-subshell ratios (1970Ag05). 
$q(E0/E2) mixing=-0.17 to +0.24 with penetration parameter (|l)=-170 to +270 from (294 ce(K))(329|g)(|q) (1971Do12). 
$(293|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.123 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.293 {I8}; A{-2}=-0.127 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.325 {I10} (1971Kr01) A{-2}=-0.101 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.323 {I22} (1969Ha43). 
$Ice(K)=25.2 {I12}, weighted average of 24.0 {I4} (1964Be23), 27.6 {I10} (1971Vi15), and 24.0 {I24} (1960Ba17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.071 {I4} from adopted Ice(K) and I|g here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 621.995 {I12} (1996TeZW), 622.019 {I10} (2015Do06), and 622.05 {I6} (1960Ba17). Others: 622.01 {I11} (1960De15); 621.74 {I5} (1974HeYW) and 622.1 {I3} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
RI$weighted average of 2.40 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 2.40 {I2} (2015Do06). Others: 3.85 {I20} (1974HeYW), 3.85 {I25} (1964Be23), and 4.15 {I25} for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0128 {I12} deduced from Ice(K)=0.63 {I6} (1971Vi15) and I|g=2.40 {I2} here; |a(K)exp=0.0087 {I8} (1964Be23) and 0.0088 {I5} (1970Be30), K/L=4.2 {I8} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak ; 
$Other Ice(K): 0.685 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.77 {I8} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 482.80 {I4} (1974HeYW), 482.793 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 482.811 {I10} (2015Do06). Others: 482.65 {I15} (1970Be30), 482.7 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 482.88 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 1.86 {I10} (1970Be30), 1.84 {I10} (1974HeYW), 1.92 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 1.920 {I19} (2015Do06). Others: 1.86 {I25} (1964Be23); 2.33 {I13} (1971Vi15) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0174 {I20} (1971Vi15), 0.021 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.0207 {I13} (1970Be30); L1/L2=1.5 {I3}, L1/L3=3.0 {I10} (1970Ag05); K/L=4.9 {I8}, L12/L3=6 (1960Ba17) 
$(483|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.101 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}. 
$Ice(K)=0.80 {I2}, weighted average of 0.79 {I2} (1964Be23), 0.83 {I8} (1971Vi15), and 0.95 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0204 {I6} from adopted Ice(K) and I|g here 
$Placed from 1962 and 2298 levels by 1960Ba17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 300.750 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 300.751 {I10} (2015Do06). Others: 300.71 {I15} (1970Be30), 300.77 {I6} (1974HeYW), and 300.71 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 1.459 {I23} (1996TeZW) and 1.432 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1.35 {I10} (1974HeYW), 1.18 {I19} (1964Be23), and 1.44 {I12} (1970Be30) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp and L-subshell ratios. |g|g(|q) give two solutions for each correlation, a low value (-0.10 {I8}, +0.2 {I4}, +0.01 {I12}) and a high value (+6 {I4}, >6), only the latter is consistent with |d value from ce data. 
$|a(K)exp=0.061 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.074 {I12} (1964Be23); L1:L2:L3=1.21 {I15}:1.79 {I22}:1.00 (1970Ag05); K/L2=3.5 {I1}, K/L3>8 (1960Ba17) 
$(301|g)(622|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I11}. 
$(301|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.006 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4}. 
$(301|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.009 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3}. 
$Ice(K)=1.78 {I4} from 1964Be23. Other: 1.80 {I18} (1960Ba17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0604 {I15} from adopted Ice(K) and I|g here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 594.3 {I3} (1971Vi15), 594.270 {I22} (1996TeZW), and 594.311 {I14} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.276 {I12} (1996TeZW) and 0.267 {I2} (2015Do06). Other: 1.07 {I13} for a composite peak (1971Vi15) 
M,MR$from the Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp=0.0227 {I26} from Ice(K)=0.124 {I14} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.267 {I2} here gives |d=1.3 {I3}. It should be noted that 593.35|g and 594.28|g are not fully resolved in |g-ray data of 1971Vi15. The adopted value is taken from |g|g(|q) data in {+194}Ir |b{+-} where only the 594.28|g is present. 
$(594|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.43 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I13}; probably contains 593|g also. |d=-0.54 {I18} or -3.2 {I15} (1996TeZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M1))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 417.95 {I15} (1996TeZW) and 418.197 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 418.06 {I20} (1970Be30) and 418.1 {I3} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
RI$weighted average of 0.07 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 0.066 {I7} (2015Do06). Other: 0.140 {I11} (1970Be30) and 0.130 {I15} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I11} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
$Ice(K)=0.073 {I29} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 607.498 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 607.493 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 607.5 {I3} (1970Be30), 607.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), 607.54 {I8} (1974HeYW), and 607.61 {I8} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.50 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.46 {I5} (1974HeYW), 0.493 {I8} (1996TeZW), 0.472 {I4} (2015Do06), and 0.9 {I4} (1964Be23). Other: 0.685 {I10} (1971Vi15) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0093 {I8} (1971Vi15), 0.007 {I+7-3} (1964Be23), 0.0122 {I10} (1970Be30). 
$Ice(K)=0.132 {I10}, weighted average of 0.125 {I10} (1964Be23), 0.130 {I10} (1971Vi15), and 0.150 {I15} (1960Ba17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0135 {I11} from adopted Ice(K) and I|g here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 901.18 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 901.071 {I17} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.060 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0506 {I11} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 645.11 {I15} (1970Be30), 645.2 {I3} (1971Vi15), 645.18 {I3} (1974HeYW), 645.152 {I9} (1996TeZW), 645.174 {I10} (2015Do06), and 645.32 {I8} (1960Ba17) 
RI$unweighted average of 3.8 {I3} (1964Be23), 3.62 {I18} (1970Be30), 3.90 {I19} (1971Vi15), 3.40 {I20} (1974HeYW), 3.86 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 3.55 {I3} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0098 {I10} (1971Vi15), 0.0104 {I11} (1964Be23), 0.0109 {I7} (1970Be30); K/L=4.7 {I5}, L12/L3=7 (1960Ba17). 
$(645|g)(622|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=+1.16 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=0.81 {I2}, from 1964Be23. Others: 0.78 {I7} (1971Vi15) and 0.90 {I9} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0107 {I4}, from Ice(K)=0.81 {I2} and I|g=3.69 {I8} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 938.69 {I15} (1970Be30), 938.71 {I3} (1974HeYW), 938.706 {I9} (1996TeZW), 938.737 {I10} (2015Do06), and 938.87 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 2.2 {I3} (1964Be23), 1.87 {I10} (1970Be30), 1.88 {I13} (1971Vi15), 1.76 {I15} (1974HeYW), 1.90 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 1.818 {I18} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0044 {I7} (1964Be23), 0.0052 {I4} (1970Be30). 
$(939|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.332 {I21}, A{-4}=+1.21 {I3}. 
$Ice(K)=0.202 {I10}, weighted average of 0.198 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.220 {I22} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.202 {I10} and I|g=1.834 {I18} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$transition seen in ce data only (1960Ba17,1964Be23). 
TI$from Ice(K)=0.067 {I3} (1964Be23) and ce(K)/ce=0.8611 for E0 (BrIcc) 
M$|a(total)exp=0.004 {I2} for a gamma line at 1270 {I20} (1956Th11); |a(K)exp>0.024 (1970Be30), >0.012 (1964Be23). 
$Ice(K)=0.069 {I4}, weighted average of 0.067 {I3} (1964Be23), and 0.080 {I8} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 562.4 {I3} (1970Be30), 562.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), 562.6 {I3} (1974HeYW), 562.449 {I20} (1996TeZW), and 562.492 {I14} (2015Do06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.128 {I10} (1970Be30), 0.15 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.147 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 0.127 {I1} (2015Do06). Other: |?0.20 (1971Vi15) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I4} deduced from Ice(K)=0.027 {I10} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.138 {I6} here, gives |d(M2/E1)=0.19 {I+8-13} or Mult=E2. |g|g(|q) data give a low value (-0.3 {I3} or -0.05 {I17}) and a high value (-5 {I+3-}|@ or >+4), the former is consistent with |a(K)exp. 
$Placement from 1997Te09. 
$(562|g)(483|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10}. 
$(562|g)[483|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 58.8 {I3} from |g|g data (1996TeZW) and 59.5 {I3} from ce data (1971Vi15). Estimated branching is 1% from 1432 level. 
RI$from Ice(L1)=0.63 {I13} and assigned Mult (1971Vi15). 
M,MR$M1(+E2), |d<0.1 from L1/L2>7 (1971Vi15), but E2 required by |DJ|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 202.76 {I20} (1970Be30), 203.0 {I3} (1971Vi15), 203.01 {I10} (1974HeYW), 203.085 {I13} (1996TeZW), 203.004 {I10} (2015Do06), and 202.91 {I6} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.54 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.57 {I6} (1971Vi15), 0.573 {I15} (1996TeZW), and 0.566 {I11} (2015Do06). Other: 1.2 {I3} (1974HeYW) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.054 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.062 {I9} (1971Vi15), giving |d<0.03. Other: |d=-0.09 {I7} from 203|g-328|g(|q), +0.5 {I3} or +1.3 {I7} from 203|g-607|g(|q) of 1996TeZW, only the first value consistent with |a(K)exp. 
$(203|g)(607|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7}. 
$(203|g)[901](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I9}. 
$Placed from 2366 level by 1960Ba17. 
$Ice(K)=0.65 {I6}, weighted average of 0.72 {I7} (1971Vi15) and 0.60 {I6} (1960Ba17, 1964Be23). 
$|a(K)exp=0.056 {I5}, from Ice(K)=0.65 {I6} and I|g=0.568 {I11} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 621.259 {I15} (1996TeZW) and 621.242 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 621.62 {I15} (1970Be30) and 621.74 {I5} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak; 621.2 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 1.39 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 1.33 {I1} (2015Do06). Other: 3.85 {I20} (1974HeYW), 3.81 {I19} (1970Be30) and 4.15 {I25} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0055 {I6}, using Ice(K)=0.150 {I15} (1971Vi15) and adopted I|g=1.33 {I1} here. |g|g(|q) data of 1996TeZW is also consistent with |d=0 (evaluators' estimate), 1996TeZW quote |d=+0.33 {I10} or +1.8 {I4} from 621|g-483|g(|q), and -0.010 {I25} from 621|g-328|g(|q). 
$(621|g)(483|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.144 {I20}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3}. 
$(621|g)[483|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.134 {I22}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 810.65 {I8} (1974HeYW), 810.53 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 810.530 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 810.5 {I3} (1970Be30), 810.47 {I20} (1971Vi15), and 810.9 {I6} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.285 {I12} (1996TeZW) and 0.283 {I3} (2015Do06). Others: 0.31 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.28 {I6} (1971Vi15), and 0.34 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0026 {I10} (1971Vi15) and 0.0021 {I7} (1970Be30) gives |d<0.1. 
$Also placed from 2357 level by 1960Ba17. 
$Ice(K)=0.0148 {I15}, weighted average of 0.013 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.015 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.0150 {I15} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.0148 {I15} and I|g=0.283 {I3} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1104.04 {I15} (1970Be30), 1103.9 {I2} (1971Vi15), 1104.06 {I5} (1974HeYW), 1104.044 {I10} (1996TeZW), 1104.068 {I10} (2015Do06), and 1104.12 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 3.39 {I17} (1970Be30), 3.48 {I13} (1971Vi15), 3.54 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 3.39 {I3} (2015Do06). Others: 3.91 {I19} (1964Be23) and 3.27 {I20} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00185 {I15} (1964Be23), 0.00213 {I14} (1970Be30); L1/L2=15.4 {I25}, L1/L3=16.3 {I47} (1970Ag05) 
$(1104|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.122 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} gives |d=-0.062 {I21} or +9.92 {I21}, only the former consistent with |a(K)exp. 
$Ice(K)=0.150 {I5}, weighted average of 0.148 {I5} (1964Be23), 0.15 {I10} (1971Vi15), and 0.170 {I17} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00214 {I8}, from Ice(K)=0.150 {I5} and I|g=3.42 {I4} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1432.50 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 1432.543 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1432.0 {I6} (1970Be30), 1431.6 {I4} (1974HeYW), 1432.3 {I3} (1960Ba17) could be for a doublet 
RI$weighted average of 0.116 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 0.112 {I2} (2015Do06). Others: 0.24 {I5} (1970Be30) and 0.30 {I5} (1974HeYW) could be for a doublet 
$|a(K)exp>0.0013 (1964Be23), 0.0029 {I7} (1970Be30) could be for a doublet. 
$Ice(K)=0.0153 {I15}, weighted average of 0.0144 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0180 {I18} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0067 {I7}, from Ice(K)=0.0153 {I15} and I|g=0.112 {I2} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 857.59 {I25} (1996TeZW) and 857.263 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.0124 {I25} (1996TeZW) and 0.020 {I2} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1150.78 {I5} (1974HeYW), 1150.765 {I11} (1996TeZW), and 1150.792 {I10} (2015Do06). Others: 1150.80 {I15} (1970Be30), 1150.9 {I2} (1971Vi15), and 1150.91 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 2.42 {I22} (1964Be23), 2.29 {I13} (1970Be30), 2.3 {I7} (1971Vi15), 2.26 {I15} (1974HeYW), 2.34 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 2.295 {I23} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.00369 {I25} (1970Be30), 0.0038 {I+23-12} (1971Vi15); L1/L2=6.8 {I16}, L1/L3|?13 (1970Ag05). Other: |a(total)exp=0.003 {I1} for a gamma line at 1160 {I20} (1956Th11). 
$(1151|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.368 {I25}, A{-4}=+1.20 {I4}. 
$Ice(K)=0.175 {I5}, weighted average of 0.173 {I5} (1964Be23), 0.174 {I16} (1971Vi15), and 0.200 {I20} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00370 {I11}, from Ice(K)=0.175 {I5} and I|g=2.306 {I23} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1479.3 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1479.27 {I10} (2015Do06), and 1479.75 {I25} (1960Ba17). Transition seen in ce data only 
M$L1/L2=26 {I7} (1970Ag05) consistent with E0. Others: |a(K)exp>0.087 (1964Be23), >0.45 (1970Be30), >0.89 (1971Vi15). 
TI$deduced from Ice(K)=2.00 {I5} (1971Vi15) and ce(K)/ce=0.8617 for E0 (BrIcc) 
$Ice(K)=1.99 {I13}, unweighted average of 1.77 {I3} (1964Be23), 2.00 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 2.20 {I22} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 244.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), 244.92 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 244.790 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.033 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0313 {I7} (2015Do06). Other: 0.045 {I7} (1977Vy01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.22 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=0.13 {I3} (1971Vi15) and adopted I|g=0.0313 {I7} here gives |d(E2/M1)=1.4 {I+8-4} or |d(M2/E1)=0.35 {I+6-7}, but Mult=E2 is required by |DJ|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 589.06 {I15} (1970Be30), 589.24 {I7} (1974HeYW), 589.199 {I10} (1996TeZW), 589.222 {I14} (2015Do06), and 589.39 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.7 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.414 {I24} (1970Be30), 0.41 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.457 {I10} (1996TeZW), and 0.438 {I4} (2015Do06). Other: 0.528 {I10} (1971Vi15) is discrepant 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I+10-4} (1964Be23), 0.0180 {I16} (1970Be30). Other: |d=+7.8 {I18} from 589|g-301|g(|q) or -0.16 {I14} from 589|g-328|g(|q) (1996TeZW), only the former is somewhat consistent with |a(K)exp. 
$(589|g)(301|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.51 {I6}. 
$(589|g)[594|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=0.159 {I12}, weighted average of 0.153 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.180 {I18} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0158 {I20}, from Ice(K)=0.159 {I12} and I|g=0.49 {I5} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 700.66 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 700.677 {I16} (2015Do06). Others: 700.6 {I6} (1970Be30) and 700.8 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.10 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.096 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 0.0918 {I9} (2015Do06). Other: 0.773 {I10} for a composite peak (1971Vi15) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0101 {I27} deduced from Ice(K)=0.019 {I5} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0919 {I9} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 889.976 {I24} (1996TeZW) and 889.967 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 889.7 {I3} (1970Be30), 889.97 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 890.09 {I15} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.26 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.25 {I6} (1971Vi15), 0.19 {I3} (1974HeYW), 0.200 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 0.182 {I2} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0128 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=0.048 {I2} and I|g=0.183 {I3} here, and |g|g(|q) in 1996TeZW with |d=+0.8 {I19} from 890|g-293|g(|q) or +0.4 {I7} from 890|g-328|g(|q) 
$(890|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I13}. 
$(890|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I15}. 
$Ice(K)=0.048 {I2}, weighted average of 0.047 {I2} (1964Be23) and 0.053 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1183.52 {I5} (1974HeYW), 1183.523 {I21} (1996TeZW), and 1183.539 {I10} (2015Do06). Others: 1183.63 {I20} (1970Be30), 1183.4 {I2} (1971Vi15), and 1183.63 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 1.30 {I25} (1964Be23), 1.04 {I10} (1970Be30), 1.1 {I7} (1971Vi15), 1.04 {I10} (1974HeYW), 1.030 {I18} (1996TeZW), and 1.006 {I10} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00502 {I20} deduced from Ice(K)=0.104 {I4} and I|g=1.012 {I10} here, L1/L2=16.9 {I77} (1970Ag05), and |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW with |d=+1.5 {I6}. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0039 {I8} (1964Be23), 0.0049 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.004 {I+8-2} (1971Vi15) 
$(1183|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I6}. 
$Ice(K)=0.104 {I4}, weighted average of 0.103 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.102 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.120 {I12} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1512.0 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1511.9 {I3} (1974HeYW), 1512.33 {I11} (1996TeZW) for a composite peak. 
RI$weighted average of 0.040 {I17} (1996TeZW), and 0.076 {I9} (2015Do06). Others: 0.19 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.18 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.19 {I3} (1974HeYW) are undivided for a doublet 
$Total intensity=0.171 {I1} for doublet in 2015Do06 and divided by evaluators for placement from 1512 based on {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.3 h) dataset, remaining intensity is assigned from 2134 level. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I+15-11} (1971Vi15) and 0.0029 {I8} (1970Be30) for the doublet is consistent with M1,E2 for both components; E2 required by |DJ|p. 
$Ice(K)=0.0121 {I10}, weighted average of 0.0110 {I10} (1964Be23), 0.0140 {I14} (1960Ba17), and 0.0125 {I20} for a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 925.265 {I14} (2015Do06), 925.15 {I7} (1974HeYW), and 925.240 {I15} (1996TeZW). Others: 925.28 {I12} (1960Ba17), 925.09 {I20} (1970Be30), and 925.3 {I2} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.495 {I5} (2015Do06), 0.75 {I25} (1964Be23), 0.48 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.60 {I8} (1971Vi15), 0.48 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 0.508 {I13} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I+30-13} (1964Be23), 0.0061 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.0056 {I+16-12} (1971Vi15) . 
$Ice(K)=0.062 {I3}, weighted average of 0.060 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.068 {I7} (1971Vi15), and 0.068 {I7} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0061 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.062 {I3} and I|g=0.497 {I5} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1218.802 {I10} (2015Do06), 1218.76 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 1218.776 {I12} (1996TeZW). Others: 1219.01 {I20} (1960Ba17), 1218.79 {I22} (1970Be30), and 1218.9 {I2} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 1.894 {I19} (2015Do06), 1.86 {I10} (1970Be30), and 1.95 {I4} (1996TeZW). Others: 2.17 {I19} (1964Be23), 2.0 {I7} (1971Vi15), and 1.76 {I15} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.00337 {I22} (1970Be30), 0.0032 {I+21-10} (1971Vi15). 
$Also placed from 2142 level by 1960Ba17. 
$Ice(K)=0.130 {I5}, weighted average of 0.128 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.129 {I8} (1971Vi15), and 0.160 {I16} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00333 {I13}, from Ice(K)=0.130 {I5} and I|g=1.903 {I19} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$transition seen in ce data only (1960Ba17, 1964Be23). 
$I|g<0.62 (1964Be23) 
TI$deduced from Ice(K)=0.072 {I6} and ce(K)/ce=0.8618 for E0 (BrIcc) 
$|a(K)exp>0.0053 (1964Be23), >0.027 (1970Be30). 
$Ice(K)=0.072 {I6}, weighted average of 0.068 {I5} (1964Be23) and 0.081 {I8} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 699.20 {I15} (1996TeZW) and 699.258 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.023 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 0.0254 {I7} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1000.168 {I14} (2015Do06), 1000.17 {I18} (1960Ba17), 1000.3 {I3} (1970Be30), 1000.2 {I2} (1971Vi15), 1000.19 {I15} (1974HeYW), and 1000.239 {I21} (1996TeZW) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.235 {I2} (2015Do06), 0.34 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.35 {I6} (1971Vi15), 0.27 {I3} (1974HeYW), and 0.286 {I10} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0081 {I8} deduced from Ice(K)=0.049 {I3} and I|g=0.296 {I22} here L1/L2=6.9 {I19}, L1/L3>18.3. Others: |d=-1.3 {I24} or +1.0 {I19} from 1000|g-293|g(|q), or -0.5 {I13} from 1000|g-328|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0070 {I14} (1970Be30), 0.0068 {I+20-14} (1971Vi15) 
$(1000|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I10}. 
$(1000|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.16 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I12}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0495 {I25}, weighted average of 0.0485 {I25} (1964Be23), 0.049 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.057 {I6} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1293.709 {I14} (2015Do06) and 1293.69 {I8} (1996TeZW). Others: 1293.9 {I5} (1960Ba17) and 1293.7 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.2 {I1} (1970Be30), 0.28 {I7} (1971Vi15), and 0.214 {I23} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.012 {I+5-3} (1971Vi15), 0.015 {I8} (1970Be30), >0.0093 (1964Be23) 
MR$from Adopted Gammas. Other: <0.8 from |a(K)exp above and +0.07 {I14} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW 
$(1294|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.29 {I18}. 
$Ice(K)=0.065 {I3}, weighted average of 0.059 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.067 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.073 {I7} (1960Ba17). 
CC$from |a(K)exp=0.0144 {I7}, from Ice(K)=0.065 {I3} and I|g=0.221 {I2} given here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1622.2 {I6} (1970Be30), 1622.23 {I15} (1974HeYW), 1622.21 {I10} (1996TeZW), and 1622.6 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.32 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.31 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.26 {I4} (1974HeYW), and 0.26 {I5} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00192 {I23}, deduced from Ice(K)=0.0118 {I14} and I|g=0.300 {I3} here. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0016 {I4} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0118 {I14}, weighted average of 0.0101 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.0130 {I13} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 859.3 {I13} (1970Be30), 859.46 {I4} (1996TeZW), 859.353 {I17} (2015Do06), and 860.2 {I8} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0961 {I9} (2015Do06), 0.10 {I4} (1970Be30), and 0.0911 {I23} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0041 {I4} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0080 {I8} and I|g=0.0954 {I12} here. Other |a(K)exp: 0.003 {I2} (1970Be30). 
$Ice(K)=0.0080 {I8} (1960Ba17). Other: |?0.0064 (1964Be23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1048.647 {I10} (2015Do06), 1048.72 {I16} (1960Ba17), 1048.58 {I15} (1970Be30), 1048.6 {I2} (1971Vi15), 1048.58 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 1048.621 {I10} (1996TeZW) 
RI$weighted average of 1.417 {I14} (2015Do06), 1.55 {I25} (1964Be23), 1.41 {I8} (1970Be30), 1.5 {I8} (1971Vi15), 1.41 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 1.48 {I3} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0093 {I+30-20} (1964Be23), 0.0103 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.010 {I+16-5} (1971Vi15), L1/L2=14.3 {I29} and L1/L3>50 (1970Ag05). Others: |d=-0.7 {I7} or -0.02 {I18} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW 
$(1049|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4}. 
$(1049|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5}. 
$Ice(K)=0.298 {I6}, weighted average of 0.297 {I6} (1964Be23), 0.30 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.35 {I4} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.01018 {I23}, from Ice(K)=0.298 {I6} and I|g=1.428 {I14} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1342.173 {I10} (2015Do06) and 1342.164 {I16} (1996TeZW). Others: 1342.44 {I20} (1960Ba17), 1342.4 {I3} (1970Be30), 1342.1 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 1342.15 {I10} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 2.128 {I21} (2015Do06), 2.55 {I25} (1964Be23), 1.96 {I17} (1970Be30), 2.51 {I10} (1971Vi15), 2.03 {I15} (1974HeYW), and 2.17 {I4} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.00590 {I16} deduced from Ice(K)=0.260 {I5} and I|g=2.15 {I4} here, L1/L2=6.6 {I12}, L1/L3=54 {I24} (1970Ag05), and |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW with |d=-0.26 {I6}. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0049 {I6} (1964Be23), 0.0064 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.0051 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
$(1342|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.41 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5}. 
$Ice(K)=0.260 {I5}, weighted average of 0.258 {I5} (1964Be23), 0.260 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.32 {I3} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1670.671 {I14} (2015Do06) and 1670.64 {I3} (1996TeZW). Others: 1670.9 {I6} (1960Ba17), 1670.8 {I3} (1970Be30), 1670.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 1670.66 {I15} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.301 {I3} (2015Do06) and 0.293 {I12} (1996TeZW). Others: 0.23 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.283 {I25} (1971Vi15), and 0.36 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0031 {I10} (1970Be30) and 0.0030 {I7} (1971Vi15) gives M1(+E2) with |d<0.9, but |DJ=2 from decay scheme requires E2. 
$Ice(K)=0.0166 {I18}, weighted average of 0.0143 {I20} (1964Be23), 0.018 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.0180 {I18} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.0166 {I18} and I|g=0.301 {I3} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 304.87 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 304.887 {I17} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.030 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 0.0290 {I6} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 814.9 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 814.58 {I6} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0121 {I22} (1996TeZW) and 0.0100 {I6} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 855.806 {I17} (2015Do06), 856.08 {I20} (1960Ba17), 855.5 {I13} (1970Be30), 855.8 {I2} (1971Vi15), and 855.87 {I3} (1996TeZW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.17 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.106 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.105 {I1} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0139 {I14} deduced from Ice(K)=0.030 {I3} and I|g=0.105 {I1} here gives |d(E2/M1)=0.53 {I+22-24} or |d(M2/E1)=0.66 {I6}; |DJ|p requires M1+E2. Other |a(K)exp: 0.009 {I3} (1970Be30), >0.0065 (1971Vi15) 
$Ice(K)=0.030 {I3}, weighted average of 0.031 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.024 {I4} (1971Vi15), and 0.034 {I4} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1156.560 {I14} (2015Do06), 1156.61 {I6} (1974HeYW), and 1156.525 {I19} (1996TeZW). Others: 1156.59 {I20} (1960Ba17), 1156.60 {I20} (1970Be30), and 1156.5 {I2} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.744 {I7} (2015Do06), 0.87 {I25} (1964Be23), 0.71 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.79 {I4} (1971Vi15), 0.76 {I6} (1974HeYW), and 0.738 {I20} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0085 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.130 {I4} and I|g=0.745 {I7} here, and L1/L2=11.6 {I17}, L1/L3>73 (1970Ag05), gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.87 {I5}, with the former consistent with |d=+0.5 {I6} or +0.20 {I24} for J(1778)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Others: |d<-0.1 {I4} or >+5 from |g|g(|q) for J(1778)=1, but this spin ruled out by Mult=D+Q from ce data for 855.8|g to 3+. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0072 {I+40-22} (1964Be23), 0.0088 {I9} (1970Be30), 0.0081 {I+13-11} (1971Vi15) 
$(1156|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6}. 
$(1156|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=0.130 {I4}, weighted average of 0.128 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.13 {I1} (1971Vi15), and 0.150 {I15} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1450.104 {I14} (2015Do06) and 1450.084 {I21} (1996TeZW). Others: 1450.48 {I20} (1960Ba17), 1450.3 {I3} (1970Be30), and 1450.06 {I15} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.509 {I5} (2015Do06), 0.51 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.53 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.55 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 0.520 {I12} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0042 {I5} deduced from Ice(K)=0.044 {I5} and I|g=0.511 {I5} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.6 or |d(M2/E1)=0.75 {I9}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.27 {I10} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW for J(1778)=2. Other |d: -0.55 {I5} from |g|g(|q) for J(1778)=1, but this spin ruled out by ce data for 855.8|g. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0039 {I4} (1970Be30) 
$(1450|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.41 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=0.044 {I5}, weighted average of 0.041 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.051 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1778.6 {I4} (1971Vi15) and 1778.52 {I16} (1996TeZW) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.082 {I19} (1971Vi15) and 0.066 {I10} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0022 {I10} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0028 {I11} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.061 {I2} here, gives M1,E2, and |DJ|p requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 250.098 {I17} (2015Do06), 250.2 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 250.12 {I4} (1996TeZW). Other: 250.1 {I13} (1970Be30), unplaced 
RI$weighted average of 0.053 {I5} (1996TeZW), 0.0596 {I6} (2015Do06), 0.050 {I6} (1977Vy01), 0.05 {I3} (1970Be30) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.025 {I10}, deduced from Ice(K)=0.030 {I12} (1971Vi15) I|g=0.0594 {I7} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 318.122 {I10} (2015Do06) and 318.124 {I18} (1996TeZW). Others: 318.11 {I20} (1970Be30), 318.2 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 318.14 {I8} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.348 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 0.345 {I3} (2015Do06). Others: 0.52 {I8} (1970Be30) and 0.30 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.035 {I13}, deduced from Ice(K)=0.25 {I9} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.345 {I3} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 364.846 {I10} (2015Do06) and 364.832 {I6} (1996TeZW). Others: 364.97 {I6} (1960Ba17), 364.77 {I15} (1970Be30), 364.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 364.87 {I4} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 2.55 {I19} (1964Be23), 2.42 {I14} (1970Be30), 3.02 {I19} (1971Vi15), 2.52 {I15} (1974HeYW), 2.56 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 2.540 {I25} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.046 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.048 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.038 {I3} (1971Vi15), L1:L2:L3=1.88 {I27}:1.94 {I27}:1.00 (1970Ag05). 
$Ice(K)=2.38 {I6}, from 1964Be23. Others: 2.38 {I10} (1971Vi15) and 2.50 {I25} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0456 {I12}, from Ice(K)=2.38 {I6} and I|g=2.548 {I25} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 530.164 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 530.182 {I10} (2015Do06). Other: 529.9 {I3} (1971Vi15); 529.06 {I10} (1974HeYW) is discrepant 
RI$weighted average of 0.987 {I18} (1996TeZW) and 0.975 {I9} (2015Do06). Other: 3.6 {I4} 1974HeYW) and 3.9 {I3} (1971Vi15) for a doublet 
M$|a(K)exp=0.006 {I1}, deduced from Ice(K)=0.125 {I14} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.977 {I9} here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1175.366 {I10} (2015Do06), 1175.34 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 1175.353 {I11} (1996TeZW). Others: 1175.46 {I20} (1960Ba17), 1175.37 {I15} (1970Be30), and 1175.3 {I2} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 3.39 {I3} (2015Do06), 3.48 {I22} (1964Be23), 3.29 {I18} (1970Be30), 3.4 {I9} (1971Vi15), 3.36 {I20} (1974HeYW), and 3.51 {I7} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00138 {I12} (1964Be23), 0.00146 {I10} (1970Be30), 0.0014 {I4} (1971Vi15), L1/L2>14, L1/L3>21 (1970Ag05). |d=+0.02 {I5}, -0.07 {I19}, or -0.07 {I8} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW consistent with mult=pure dipole. 
$(1175|g)(622|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I9}. 
$(1175|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.014 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}. 
$(1175|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.036 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}. 
$Ice(K)=0.097 {I3}, weighted average of 0.098 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.095 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.120 {I12} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00139 {I5}, from Ice(K)=0.097 {I3} and I|g=3.41 {I3} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1468.914 {I10} (2015Do06), 1469.36 {I25} (1960Ba17), 1468.92 {I15} (1970Be30), 1468.9 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1468.89 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 1468.882 {I15} (1996TeZW) 
RI$weighted average of 10.76 {I11} (2015Do06), 11.9 {I6} (1964Be23), 10.6 {I6} (1970Be30), 11 {I3} (1971Vi15), 10.5 {I6} (1974HeYW), and 10.94 {I18} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00101 {I8} (1964Be23), 0.00114 {I8} (1970Be30), 0.0012 {I4} (1971Vi15), L1/L2=26 {I7}, L1/L3=21 {I6} (1970Ag05). |d(M2/E2)=-0.006 {I9} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW consistent with mult=pure dipole. 
$(1469|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.247 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.054 {I17}. 
$Ice(K)=0.248 {I5}, weighted average of 0.246 {I5} (1964Be23), 0.265 {I15} (1971Vi15), and 0.26 {I3} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00112 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.248 {I5} and I|g=10.82 {I11} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1797.418 {I14} (2015Do06), 1798.0 {I4} (1960Ba17), 1797.44 {I20} (1970Be30), 1797.3 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1797.31 {I8} (1974HeYW), and 1797.378 {I21} (1996TeZW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.935 {I9} (2015Do06), 0.95 {I8} (1970Be30), 0.94 {I7} (1971Vi15), 1.06 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 0.98 {I3} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp>0.0028 (1964Be23), 0.00107 {I11} (1970Be30), 0.00078 {I12} (1971Vi15). 
$Ice(K)=0.021 {I3}, unweighted average of 0.021 {I1} (1964Be23), 0.015 {I2} (1971Vi15), and 0.026 {I3} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00109 {I16}, from Ice(K)=0.021 {I3} and I|g=0.940 {I9} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06 for a doublet. Others: 1802.62 {I4} (1996TeZW), 1803.0 {I6} (1970Be30), 1803.1 {I4} (1971Vi15), and 1803.1 {I8} (1960Ba17) could be also for a doublet 
RI$from 2015Do06 for a doublet. Others: 0.21 {I1} (1996TeZW), 0.25 {I8} (1971Vi15), and 0.30 {I9} (1970Be30) could be also for a doublet; 0.87 {I25} (1964Be23) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I9} (1970Be30), 0.0022 {I+15-8} (1971Vi15), |?0.00062 (1964Be23) for a composite peak 
$Ice(K)=0.0122 {I12}, weighted average of 0.0115 {I12} (1971Vi15) and 0.0130 {I13} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak. Other: |?0.011 (1964Be23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 894.02 {I6} (1996TeZW), 893.794 {I17} (2015Do06), and 894.4 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.060 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0401 {I6} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I21} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0097 {I10} and I|g=0.050 {I10} here gives |d(E2/M1)=1.1 {I+8-4} or |d(M2/E1)=0.53 {I10}, with the former consistent with |D|p=+ based on L(p,d)=1+3 from 1/2- 
$Ice(K)=0.0097 {I10}, weighted average of 0.0086 {I20} (1964Be23) and 0.0100 {I10} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1194.526 {I14} (2015Do06) and 1194.60 {I7} (1996TeZW). Others: 1195.1 {I4} (1960Ba17), 1194.9 {I13} (1970Be30), 
RI$unweighted average of 0.050 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 0.0672 {I6} (2015Do06). Others: 0.31 {I19} (1964Be23) and 0.13 {I5} (1970Be30) could be for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0008 {I+16-4} (1964Be23) and 0.0020 {I8} (1970Be30) could be for a composite peak. 
$Ice(K)=0.0058 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0054 {I5} (1964Be23) and 0.0066 {I7} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1488.3 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 1489.02 {I5} (2015Do06). Others: 1487.0 {I3} (1974HeYW) and 1487.9 {I5} (1960Ba17) for a doublet; 1486.8 {I6} (1970Be30) is discrepant. 
$Poor fit, level-energy difference=1488.11 
RI$weighted average of 0.028 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 0.0187 {I8} (2015Do06). Others: 0.22 {I5} (1970Be30) and 0.20 {I4} (1974HeYW) for a doublet 
$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I11} (1970Be30), >0.0015 (1964Be23) for a doublet. 
$Ice(K)=0.0206 {I22}, weighted average of 0.018 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.0220 {I22} (1960Ba17) for a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1996TeZW. Other: 1817.0 {I5} (1977Vy01) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.014 {I5} (1996TeZW), 0.06 {I2} (1977Vy01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1565.28 {I6} (1996TeZW) and 1565.126 {I17} (2015Do06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.086 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 0.0632 {I8} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,M$transition seen in ce data only (1960Ba17, 1964Be23). 
TI$deduced from Ice(K)=0.0175 {I18} and ce(K)/ce=0.8626 for E0 (BrIcc) 
$Ice(K)=0.0175 {I18}, weighted average of 0.015 {I4} (1964Be23) and 0.0180 {I18} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 253.6 {I3} (1971Vi15), 253.6 {I4} (1996TeZW) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.005 {I4} (1996TeZW) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.40 {I+20-15} deduced from Ice(K)=0.043 {I13} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0052 {I6} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 412.290 {I17} (2015Do06) and 412.20 {I11} (1996TeZW). Other: 412.3 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.025 {I7} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.072 {I+24-21} deduced from Ice(K)=0.044 {I13} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0292 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=0.9 {I+8-5} or |d(M2/E1)=0.49 {I12}, and |DJ|p requires M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1302.4 {I6} (1970Be30), 1302.29 {I8} (1974HeYW), 1302.24 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 1302.55 {I15} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.422 {I13} (1996TeZW) and 0.436 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.50 {I25} (1964Be23), 0.45 {I9} (1970Be30), and 0.43 {I4} (1974HeYW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I4} deduced from Ice(K)=0.044 {I3} and I|g=0.435 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=0.56 {I+22-23} or |d(M2/E1)=0.68 {I5}, and |DJ|p requires M1+E2. Other |d: -1.7 {I17}, 0 to -4 {I+4-}|@, -0.9 {I+4-}|@ (1996TeZW). Other |a(K)exp: 0.0042 {I+53-17} (1964Be23), 0.0047 {I10} (1970Be30). 
$(1302|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I9}. 
$(1302|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I9}. 
$Ice(K)=0.044 {I3}, weighted average of 0.043 {I2} (1964Be23) and 0.051 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1595.797 {I19} (1996TeZW) and 1595.812 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1595.8 {I3} (1970Be30), 1595.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1595.8 {I1} (1974HeYW), and 1596.2 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 3.00 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 3.00 {I3} (2015Do06). Others: 2.9 {I8} (1970Be30) and 2.8 {I3} (1974HeYW); 4.7 {I6} (1964Be23) and 6.0 {I6} (1971Vi15) for a doublet 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I+9-6} (1964Be23), 0.0041 {I12} (1970Be30), and 0.0040 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.243 {I15} (1971Vi15) and I|g=3.00 {I3} here. 
MR$from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW, consistent with |d<0.3 from ce data above. 
$(1596|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.167 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4}. 
$Ice(K)=0.250 {I15}, weighted average of 0.245 {I20} (1964Be23), 0.243 {I15} (1971Vi15), and 0.29 {I3} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00407 {I25}, from Ice(K)=0.250 {I15} and I|g=3.00 {I3} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1924.13 {I15} (1970Be30), 1924.2 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1924.18 {I5} (1974HeYW), 1924.225 {I22} (1996TeZW), 1924.300 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1924.60 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 3.26 {I13} (1964Be23), 3.30 {I17} (1970Be30), 3.5 {I7} (1971Vi15), 3.22 {I20} (1974HeYW), 3.63 {I13} (1996TeZW), and 3.24 {I4} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00225 {I11} (1964Be23), 0.00219 {I13} (1970Be30), and 0.0021 {I+6-4} (1971Vi15) gives |d<0.3 
$Ice(K)=0.150 {I3}, weighted average of 0.148 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.151 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.180 {I18} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00224 {I6}, from Ice(K)=0.150 {I3} and I|g=3.27 {I5} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1007.0 {I6} (1970Be30), 1007.5 {I2} (1971Vi15), 1007.53 {I4} (1996TeZW), 1007.589 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1007.5 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.14 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.20 {I6} (1971Vi15), 0.108 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.0992 {I10} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0071 {I10}, deduced from Ice(K)=0.0144 {I20} and I|g=0.0994 {I13} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=1.1 {I+5-3} or |d(M2/E1)=0.53 {I+6-7}, with the former consistent with |D|p=+ based on L(p,d)=1+3 from 1/2-. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0040 {I14} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0144 {I20}, weighted average of 0.012 {I2} (1964Be23) and 0.0160 {I16} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1119.8 {I6} (1970Be30), 1119.3 {I3} (1996TeZW), 1119.117 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1119.7 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.22 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.21 {I5} (1971Vi15), 0.10 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 0.106 {I1} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0046 {I5} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0100 {I10} and I|g=0.106 {I2} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=1.9 {I+9-5} or |d(M2/E1)=0.46 {I+4-5}, but |DJ|p requires E2 
$Ice(K)=0.0100 {I10}, weighted average of 0.0092 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0110 {I11} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1308.2 {I6} (1970Be30), 1308.55 {I20} (1974HeYW), 1308.32 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 1308.59 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.24 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.25 {I5} (1971Vi15), 0.24 {I3} (1974HeYW), 0.224 {I8} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0034 {I4}, from Ice(K)=0.0167 {I19} and I|g=0.239 {I2} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=1.7 {I+11-5}, or |d(M2/E1)=0.49 {I5}, with the former consistent with |D|p=+ based on L(p,d)=1+3 from 1/2-. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0036 {I5} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0167 {I19}, weighted average of 0.0152 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.0190 {I19} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1601.9 {I3} (1970Be30), 1601.7 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1602.01 {I10} (1974HeYW), 1601.848 {I24} (1996TeZW), 1601.904 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1602.0 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.377 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 0.385 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.40 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.39 {I7} (1971Vi15), and 0.45 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0041 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.032 {I2} and I|g=0.384 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2, |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW gives |d=-0.5 {I4} or -0.55 {I4}, with the former consistent with |d from ce data. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0036 {I5} (1970Be30) 
$(1602|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.52 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I9} 
$Ice(K)=0.032 {I2}, weighted average of 0.030 {I2} (1964Be23), 0.032 {I2} (1971Vi15), and 0.036 {I4} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 163.4 {I3} (1970Be30), 164.0 {I3} (1971Vi15), 163.6 {I3} (1974HeYW), 164.01 {I3} (1996TeZW), 163.926 {I22} (2015Do06), and 163.94 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.200 {I17} (1970Be30), 0.22 {I3} (1974HeYW), 0.190 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 0.209 {I4} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$from K/L1=7.7 {I7}, L1/L2=7.1 {I25}, L1/L3=16 {I8} (1971Vi15); K/L=4.6 {I1}, L1/L3>14 (1960Ba17); |a(K)exp=1.2 {I2} deduced from Ice(K)=5.0 {I5} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.205 {I5} here. Other |a(K)exp: 1.0 {I5} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 223.99 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 223.907 {I21} (2015Do06). Other: 224.0 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.0550 {I23} (1996TeZW), 0.052 {I10} (1977Vy01) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I7} deduced from Ice(K)=0.27 {I8} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0544 {I10} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=1.7 {I+14-5} or |d(M2/E1)=0.30 {I6}, with the former consistent with |DJ|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 290.8 {I3} (1971Vi15) and 290.690 {I16} (1996TeZW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.32 {I1} (1996TeZW) and 0.327 {I5} (2015Do06). Other: 0.18 {I6} (1977Vy01) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.012 {I5} deduced from Ice(K)=0.08 {I3} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.326 {I5} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 338.88 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 339.137 {I26} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.018 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0168 {I6} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 449.13 {I20} (1970Be30), 449.1 {I3} (1971Vi15), 449.36 {I7} (1974HeYW), 449.303 {I12} (1996TeZW), and 449.335 {I14} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.240 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.243 {I2} (2015Do06). Others: 0.268 {I21} (1970Be30) and 0.30 {I3} (1974HeYW); 0.44 {I4} (1971Vi15) could be for a composite peak 
M$|d<0.1 from |a(K)exp=0.081 {I+19-15} (1971Vi15) 
$Ice(K)=0.073 {I7} (1971Vi15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 528.767 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 528.782 {I10} (2015Do06). Others: 528.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), 529.06 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 528.95 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 2.85 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 2.83 {I3} (2015Do06). Others: 3.2 {I3} (1964Be23), 3.9 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 3.6 {I4} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0265 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=1.54 {I3} and I|g=2.84 {I3} here, L2/L3>2.7, K/L2=17 {I3}, K/L3>45 (1970Ag05). Other |a(K)exp: 0.0233 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.0200 {I12} (1970Be30), and 0.020 {I2} (1971Vi15), for a composite peak. Other |d: -0.45 {I9}, -5.5 {I23}, -1.3 {I3}, -0.77 {I10}, -2.4 {I4} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Sign of |d from |g|g(|q) 
$(529|g)(202|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.21 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I10}. 
$(529|g)(1104|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.309 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3}. 
$(529|g)[1104|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I5}. 
$Ice(K)=1.54 {I3}, weighted average of 1.53 {I3} (1964Be23), 1.58 {I10} (1971Vi15), and 1.80 {I18} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1038.45 {I20} (1970Be30), 1038.56 {I8} (1974HeYW), 1038.57 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 1038.80 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.56 {I25} (1964Be23), 0.51 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.53 {I6} (1971Vi15), 0.52 {I5} (1974HeYW), and 0.50 {I7} (1996TeZW) 
M$|d<0.07 from |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I2} (1970Be30), 0.0014 {I+14-5} (1964Be23). Other |d: -0.19 {I3} or +0.00 {I15} (1996TeZW,|g|g(|q)). 
$(1039|g)(301|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7}. 
$(1039|g)[594|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0163 {I15}, weighted average of 0.0155 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0190 {I19} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00159 {I15}, from Ice(K)=0.0163 {I15} and I|g=0.499 {I5} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1339.26 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 1339.250 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1339.7 {I6} (1970Be30), 1339.3 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 1339.6 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
$Level-energy difference=1339.300 
RI$weighted average of 0.354 {I13} (1996TeZW) and 0.361 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.48 {I24} (1970Be30), 2.51 {I10} (1971Vi15), and 0.45 {I10} (1974HeYW) 
$|a(total)exp=0.007 {I3} for a gamma line at 1340 {I20} (1956Th11). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.015 {I2} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.360 {I4} here, gives |d=0.30 {I+5-6}; |d=0.0 {I9} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. 
$(1339|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1633.0 {I3} (1970Be30), 1632.86 {I15} (1974HeYW), 1632.79 {I3} (1996TeZW), 1632.858 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1633.5 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.385 {I25} (1971Vi15), 0.429 {I13} (1996TeZW), and 0.429 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.37 {I4} (1970Be30) and 0.47 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.00066 {I15} (1970Be30) gives |d<0.11; |d=-0.23 {I13} or -1.08 {I29} from |g|g(|q) (1996TeZW). 
$(1633|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.40 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I11}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0063 {I10}, weighted average of 0.005 {I1} (1964Be23) and 0.0070 {I7} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1081.8 {I19} (1970Be30), 1080.63 {I21} (1996TeZW), 1080.91 {I10} (2015Do06), and 1081.6 {I4} (1960Ba17). This transition was placed from 2312 level in 1970Be30 and 1971Vi15 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.05 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.020 {I8} (1996TeZW), <0.15 (1971Vi15) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0098 {I14} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0046 {I5} and I|g=0.023 {I2} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.4 or |d(M2/E1)=0.84 {I+13-12}, with the former more likely. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0039 {I20} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0046 {I5}, weighted average of 0.0039 {I7} (1964Be23) and 0.0050 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2015Do06. Others:1675.1 {I5} (1996TeZW) with I|g=0.10 {I7} (1996TeZW); 1675.7 {I3} (1974HeYW) with I|g=0.27 {I4}, 1675.9 {I6} with I|g=0.17 {I5}, and 1675.9 {I3} with I|g=0.226 {I25} for a composite peak. See also 1676|g placed from 2298 level 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I14} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
$Ice(K)=0.0195 {I25}, unweighted average of 0.0170 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0220 {I22} (1960Ba17), for a composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 227.15 {I4} (2015Do06) and 226.94 {I10} (1960Ba17). Placement from 1960Ba17 and 2015Do06; not seen in 1996TeZW. Also placed from 2312 level by 1960Ba17. 
RI$from 2015Do06 
$Ice(K)=0.30 {I3}, weighted average of 0.33 {I7} (1964Be23) and 0.30 {I3} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 373.33 {I14} (1996TeZW) and 373.102 {I22} (2015Do06) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.0111 {I25} (1996TeZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 421.65 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 421.538 {I17} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.050 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 0.0439 {I5} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Table 4 of 2015Do06. According to e-mail reply of July 8, 2015 from K. Krane, values E|g=776.63 {I8}, I|g=0.0082 {I8} are for a doublet, the other component belonging to double-escape peak of 1797.4|g. 
$Level-energy difference=776.52 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1421.65 {I7} (1974HeYW), 1421.667 {I20} (1996TeZW), and 1421.686 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1421.6 {I3} (1970Be30), 1421.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 1421.77 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.54 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.54 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.60 {I5} (1974HeYW), 0.598 {I13} (1996TeZW), and 0.578 {I5} (2015Do06) 
RI$0.54 {I31} in Table I of 1971Vi15 is most likely 0.540 {I31} 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00458 {I18}, from Ice(K)=0.0544 {I21} and I|g=0.580 {I5} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.78 {I4}, with the former consistent with |d=+0.4 {I5} or -0.01 {I18} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: >0.0047 (1964Be23), 0.0049 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.0049 {I5} (1971Vi15). 
$(1422|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.09 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I7}. 
$(1422|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I7}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0544 {I21}, weighted average of 0.0535 {I20} (1964Be23), 0.054 {I4} (1971Vi15), and 0.066 {I7} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1715.16 {I20} (1970Be30), 1715.23 {I6} (1974HeYW), 1715.195 {I21} (1996TeZW), 1715.252 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1715.7 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 1.30 {I25} (1964Be23), 1.12 {I9} (1970Be30), 1.14 {I10} (1974HeYW), 1.20 {I4} (1996TeZW); 0.12 {I4} in Table I of 1971Vi15 is most likely a typo and should be 1.2 {I4}, considering other I|g values are in agreement with those of other studies 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0026 {I5} deduced from Ice(K)=0.053 {I5} and I|g=1.175 {I14} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<1.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.69 {I+14-13}, with the former consistent with |d=-1.10 {I12} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0019 {I+8-5} (1964Be23), 0.00223 {I23} (1970Be30) 
$(1715|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.60 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.33 {I6}. 
$Ice(K)=0.053 {I5}, weighted average of 0.051 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.064 {I7} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2043.67 {I6} (1974HeYW), 2043.68 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 2043.730 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 2043.67 {I15} (1970Be30) and 2044.1 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 6.21 {I25} (1964Be23), 6.0 {I3} (1970Be30), 6.3 {I3} (1971Vi15), 5.92 {I4} (1974HeYW), 6.3 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 6.01 {I8} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00189 {I7}, from Ice(K)=0.231 {I8} and I|g=5.95 {I4} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.76 {I3}, with only the former consistent with this transition feeding 0+ g.s., which requires pure dipole. Other |a(K)exp: 0.00181 {I+25-22} (1964Be23), 0.00187 {I11} (1970Be30) 
$|a(total)exp=0.0018 {I5} for a gamma line at 2050 {I15} (1956Th11). 
$Ice(K)=0.231 {I8}, weighted average of 0.230 {I5} (1964Be23) and 0.28 {I3} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1430.95 {I8} (1996TeZW); 1431.6 {I4} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
RI$weighted average of 0.121 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 0.115 {I1} (2015Do06). Other: 0.30 {I5} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1724.26 {I6} (1996TeZW) and 1724.539 {I17} (2015Do06). Other: 1724.1 {I13} (1970Be30) 
RI$weighted average of 0.096 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 0.0893 {I9} (2015Do06). Other: 0.13 {I7} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1140.98 {I11} (1996TeZW), 1141.0 {I4} (1960Ba17), 1141.0 {I2} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.031 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 0.0309 {I5} (2015Do06). Others: 0.6 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.04 {I2} (1977Vy01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0123 {I19}, from Ice(K)=0.0078 {I12} and I|g=0.0309 {I5} here 
$Ice(K)=0.0078 {I12}, unweighted average of 0.0075 {I2} (1964Be23), 0.0058 {I6} (1971Vi15), and 0.0100 {I10} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1441.68 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1441.705 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1442.0 {I6} (1970Be30), 1441.87 {I15} (1974HeYW), and 1442.0 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.26 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.30 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.33 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.273 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 0.254 {I2} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0042 {I4}, from Ice(K)=0.0218 {I19} and I|g=0.255 {I3} here, gives |d(E2/M2)<0.6 or |d(M2/E1)=0.74 {I7}, with only the former consistent with |d=0.0 {I3} or +3 +|@-3 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: >0.0013 (1964Be23), 0.0039 {I9} (1970Be30). 
$(1442|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I11}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0218 {I19}, weighted average of 0.0207 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.0250 {I25} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1735.2 {I3} (1970Be30), 1735.3 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1735.31 {I10} (1974HeYW), 1735.21 {I3} (1996TeZW), 1735.251 {I14} (2015Do06). Other: 1735.8 {I3} (1960Ba17) for a doublet 
RI$weighted average of 0.492 {I17} (1996TeZW) and 0.473 {I5} (2015Do06). Others: 0.47 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.46 (1974HeYW); 5.2 {I4} in Table 1 of 1971Vi15 is most likely a typo and should be 0.52 {I4} 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00292 {I21}, from Ice(K)=0.0284 {I20} and I|g=0.475 {I5} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.80 {I+7-6}, with only the former consistent with |d=+0.12 {I6} for J(2063)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |d: -0.36 {I5} for J(2063)=1 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: >0.0041 for a doublet and 0.00278 {I29} (1970Be30) 
$(1735|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I8}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0284 {I20}, weighted average of 0.0262 {I15} (1964Be23), 0.031 {I2} (1971Vi15), and 0.034 {I4} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 2063.68 {I23} (1996TeZW), 2063.7 {I5} (1977Vy01) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.013 {I4} (1996TeZW), 0.016 {I4} (1977Vy01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1463.429 {I19} (1996TeZW) and 1463.436 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1463.1 {I6} (1970Be30), 1463.7 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1463.45 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 1463.69 {I25} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 1.2 {I3} (1970Be30), 1.19 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 1.094 {I22} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00214 {I22} deduced from Ice(K)=0.048 {I5} and I|g=1.095 {I11} here gives Mult=E2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.40 {I4}, but |DJ|p=2+ requires E2. Other |a(K)exp: >0.00091 (1964Be23), 0.0012 {I3} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.048 {I5}, weighted average of 0.047 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.042 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.064 {I7} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1757.2 {I6} (1970Be30), 1756.98 {I6} (1996TeZW), and 1757.6 {I15} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.10 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.096 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.0949 {I9} (2015Do06). Other: 0.0566 {I19} (1971Vi15) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00103 {I11} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0020 {I2} and I|g=0.0949 {I9} here, gives Mult=E2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.26 {I+4-5}, but |DJ|p=2+ requires E2. 
$Ice(K)=0.0020 {I2} (1960Ba17). Other: 0.0018 (1964Be23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$seen in ce data (1960Ba17, 1964Be23) 
TI$deduced from Ice(K)=0.111 {I4} and ce(K)/ce=0.8630 for E0 (BrIcc) 
M$|a(K)exp>0.054 (1964Be23), >0.13 (1970Be30), >0.13 (1971Vi15), which are larger than any of pure Mult for this transition feeding 0+ g.s., and can be explained only by this transition being E0 
$Ice(K)=0.111 {I4}, weighted average of 0.110 {I5} (1971Vi15), 0.110 {I4} (1964Be23), and 0.130 {I13} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1186.27 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 1186.332 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1186.3 {I2} (1971Vi15) and 1187.1 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.09 {I4} (1977Vy01), 0.121 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.107 {I1} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I7}, from Ice(K)=0.0108 {I16} and I|g=0.108 {I2} here gives |d(E2/M1)=1.1 {I+6-4} or |d(M2/E1)=0.55 {I7}, with only the former consistent with |D|p=+ based on L(p,d)=1+3 from 1/2-. 
$Ice(K)=0.0108 {I16}, weighted average of 0.011 {I2} (1964Be23), 0.0079 {I15} (1971Vi15), and 0.0130 {I13} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1486.8 {I6} (1970Be30), 1486.9 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1487.0 {I3} (1974HeYW), 1487.16 {I3} (1996TeZW), 1487.089 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1487.9 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.22 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.26 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.20 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.200 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 0.196 {I2} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I6}, from Ice(K)=0.0199 {I22} and I|g=0.197 {I2} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.95 {I+15-13}, with only the former consistent with |D|p=+. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0026 {I3} (1949St17), 0.0040 {I11} (1970Be30), 0.0034 {I7} (1971Vi15), >0.0018 (1964Be23) 
$Ice(K)=0.0199 {I22}, weighted average of 0.018 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.018 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.0220 {I22} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 189.8 {I3} (1971Vi15) and 190.07 {I8} (2015Do06). This transition was placed from 1622 level by 1971Vi15 
RI$from 2015Do06. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.67 {I+39-27} deduced from Ice(K)=0.075 {I22} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0055 {I10} here. 0.42 {I+15-18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 846.9 {I6} (1970Be30), 846.8 {I2} (1971Vi15), 846.786 {I10} (1996TeZW), 846.896 {I14} (2015Do06), and 847.42 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.09 {I3} (1970Be30), <0.10 (1971Vi15); 0.997 {I20} (1996TeZW) is discrepant 
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I6} (1970Be30), and 0.020 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.027 {I4} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0657 {I6} here give |d(E2/M1)<0.4, and |DJ|p requires pure M1. 
$Ice(K)=0.028 {I3}, weighted average of 0.027 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.027 {I4} (1971Vi15), and 0.030 {I3} (1960Ba17). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0208 {I23} deduced from Ice(K)=0.028 {I3} and I|g=0.0657 {I6} here, gives Mult=M1 or E1+M2 with |d=0.95 {I12}, but only the former consistent with this transition feeding 0+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1492.06 {I6} (1996TeZW) and 1492.067 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1491.8 {I3} (1970Be30), 1491.97 {I15} (1974HeYW), and 1492.7 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.42 {I19} (1964Be23), 0.29 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.31 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.29 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.293 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.283 {I3} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0045 {I7}, from Ice(K)=0.026 {I4} and I|g=0.285 {I3} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.5 or |d(M2/E1)=0.87 {I+16-14}, with only the former consistent with |d=+0.4 {I8} or -0.2 {I3} from |g|g(|q) (1996TeZW). Other |a(K)exp: 0.0026 {I+29-11} (1964Be23), 0.0036 {I6} (1970Be30) 
$(1492|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I11}. 
$(1492|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I12}. 
$Ice(K)=0.026 {I4}, unweighted average of 0.022 {I2} (1964Be23) and 0.029 {I3} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1785.63 {I20} (1970Be30), 1785.7 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1785.47 {I7} (1974HeYW), 1785.62 {I3} (1996TeZW), 1785.645 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1786.3 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.64 {I8} (1970Be30), 0.61 {I5} (1971Vi15), 0.62 {I6} (1974HeYW), and 0.689 {I25} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00276 {I15} deduced from Ice(K)=0.038 {I2} and I|g=0.672 {I6} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.81 {I5}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.04 {I3} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0033 {I4} (1971Vi15), 0.0027 {I4} (1970Be30), >0.0042 (1964Be23) 
$(1786|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6}. 
$Ice(K)=0.038 {I2}, weighted average of 0.036 {I2} (1964Be23), 0.041 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.044 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2114.06 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 2114.105 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 2114.16 {I20} (1970Be30), 2113.93 {I20} (1974HeYW), and 2114.0 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.40 {I9} (1964Be23), 0.40 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.440 {I13} (1971Vi15), 0.46 {I5} (1974HeYW), 0.447 {I23} (1996TeZW), and 0.418 {I4} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00204 {I22}, from Ice(K)=0.0176 {I19} and I|g=0.421 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.4 or |d(M2/E1)=0.91 {I+13-11}, with only the former consistent with this transition feeding 0+ g.s., which requires pure dipole 
$Ice(K)=0.0176 {I19}, weighted average of 0.0160 {I20} (1964Be23) and 0.0190 {I19} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 1208.5 {I4} with I|g=0.4 {I2} from ce data (1960Ba17, 1964Be23), unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2015Do06 only. See also placement from 1802 level 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I9} (1970Be30), 0.0022 {I+15-8} (1971Vi15), |?0.00062 (1964Be23) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1512.0 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1511.9 {I3} (1974HeYW), 1512.33 {I11} (1996TeZW) for a composite peak 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.162 {I15} (1996TeZW), 0.19 {I3} (1974HeYW), 0.19 {I5} (1970Be30), and 0.18 {I3} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp>0.0017 (1964Be23), 0.0029 {I8} (1970Be30), 0.0035 {I+15-11} (1971Vi15) for a doublet. See also the placement from 1512 level. 
$Ice(K)=0.0121 {I10}, weighted average of 0.0110 {I10} (1964Be23), 0.0140 {I14} (1960Ba17), and 0.0125 {I20} for a doublet. 
$Total intensity=0.171 {I1} for doublet in 2015Do06 and divided by evaluators for placement from 1512 based on {+194}Ir |b{+-} decay (19.3 h) dataset, remaining intensity is assigned from 2134 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1805.7 {I6} (1970Be30), 1806.1 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1805.72 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 1805.9 {I8} (1960Ba17) 
$Level-energy difference=1805.624 
RI$weighted average of 0.29 {I9} (1970Be30), 0.32 {I8} (1971Vi15), 0.237 {I12} (1996TeZW), and 0.218 {I2} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0026 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.0117 {I12} and I|g=0.219 {I3} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.5 or |d(M2/E1)=0.79 {I10}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.25 {I4} for J(2134)=1 or +0.27 {I6} for J(2134)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: >0.0015 (1964Be23), 0.0017 {I9} (1970Be30), 0.0017 {I+9-5} (1971Vi15). 
$(1806|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.03 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I8}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0117 {I12}, weighted average of 0.0113 {I12} (1971Vi15) and 0.0120 {I12} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1518.62 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 1518.662 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1518.8 {I6} (1970Be30), 1518.4 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1518.5 {I2} (1974HeYW), and 1518.9 {I6} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.13 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.11 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.11 {I2} (1974HeYW), and 0.108 {I7} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0037 {I4}, from Ice(K)=0.0085 {I9} and I|g=0.112 {I1} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.7 or |d(M2/E1)=0.74 {I8}, with the former more likely. Other: |a(K)exp: >0.0012 (1964Be23), 0.0028 {I9} (1970Be30), 0.0050 {I+35-19} (1971Vi15). 
$Ice(K)=0.0085 {I9}, weighted average of 0.0073 {I10} (1964Be23), 0.0110 {I20} (1971Vi15), and 0.0090 {I9} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1812.21 {I25} (1996TeZW), and 1812.8 {I6} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.055 {I12} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0042 {I4}, from Ice(K)=0.0043 {I4} and I|g=0.0503 {I8} here gives Mult=M1 or |d(M2/E1)=1.5 {I+4-3}, with the former more likely 
$Ice(K)=0.0043 {I4}, weighted average of 0.0041 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.0050 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Other: 1535.5 {I3} (1996TeZW) 
$Level-energy difference=1535.966 
RI$unweighted average of 0.016 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0328 {I8} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1829.50 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1829.523 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1829.6 {I3} (1970Be30), 1829.41 {I10} (1974HeYW), and 1830.1 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.48 {I19} (1964Be23), 0.39 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.365 {I19} (1971Vi15), 0.41 {I5} (1974HeYW), 0.421 {I17} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.0232 {I24} and I|g=0.392 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.92 {I12}, with only the former consistent with -0.41 {I7} for J(2158)=1, +0.02 {I12} for J(2158)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0022 {I+20-9} (1964Be23), 0.0028 {I3} (1970Be30) 
$(1829|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.23 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I12}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0232 {I24}, weighted average of 0.0220 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.028 {I3} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Ice(L1)=5.4 {I15} and assigned mult and |d. 
M,MR$from L1/L2=8.5 {I16} (1971Vi15), |d<0.1; |d=0 required by 0+ to 1+ transition. 
$|a(total)exp=0.013 {I5} for a gamma line at 2150 {I15} (1956Th11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 239.43 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 239.445 {I17} (2015Do06). Other: 239.5 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.099 {I8} (1996TeZW), 0.0792 {I16} (2015Do06), and 0.090 {I10} (1977Vy01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.56 {I11} deduced from Ice(K)=0.92 {I18} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.080 {I3} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.4; |DJ|p=1+ requires pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 366.42 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 366.356 {I16} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.058 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 0.0475 {I10} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1835.33 {I7} (1974HeYW), 1835.244 {I24} (1996TeZW), and 1835.282 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1835.19 {I20} (1970Be30) and 1835.9 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.45 {I19} (1964Be23), 0.58 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.66 {I4} (1971Vi15), 0.64 {I6} (1974HeYW), 0.679 {I25} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00154 {I12} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0203 {I16} and I|g=0.642 {I6} here. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0021 {I+20-8} (1964Be23), 0.00166 {I15} (1970Be30). 
$Ice(K)=0.0203 {I16}, weighted average of 0.0196 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0240 {I24} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$transition seen in ce data only (1960Ba17, 1964Be23). 
TI$deduced from Ice(K)=0.314 {I17} and ce(K)/ce=0.8631 for E0 (BrIcc) 
M$|a(K)exp>0.16 (1964Be23), >0.36 (1970Be30), which are larger than any of pure Mult for this transition feeding 0+ g.s., and can be explained only by this transition being E0. 
$Ice(K)=0.314 {I17}, weighted average of 0.310 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.38 {I4} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1262.42 {I9} (1996TeZW) and 1262.124 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.046 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0401 {I6} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1562.91 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 1562.889 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1562.81 {I20} (1970Be30), 1562.8 {I3} (1974HeYW), and 1563.4 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.469 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 0.456 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.51 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.55 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.56 {I7} (1974HeYW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0039 {I3}, from Ice(K)=0.037 {I3} and I|g=0.458 {I5} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.84 {I7}, with only the former consistent with low values of |d=+0.1 {I7}, -0.22 {I25} for J(2185)=1, -0.5 {I16}, +0.3 {I4}, +2.0 +|@{I-16}, -7 {I+5-}|@ for J(2185)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0034 {I4} (1970Be30), >0.0028 (1964Be23) 
$(1563|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I10}. 
$(1563|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I10}. 
$Ice(K)=0.037 {I3}, weighted average of 0.0354 {I20} (1964Be23) and 0.044 {I5} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 856.37 {I7} (1996TeZW), 1856.3 {I13} (1970Be30) 
RI$weighted average of 0.058 {I3} (1996TeZW), 0.0606 {I6} (2015Do06), 0.050 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.07 {I4} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 702.6 {I3} (1971Vi15), 703.09 {I20} (1996TeZW), and 702.532 {I18} (2015Do06). Other: 703.54 {I5} (1974HeYW), 703.43 {I15} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.15 {I12} (1996TeZW); 0.66 {I6} (1974HeYW), 0.773 {I10}, 0.71 {I6} (1970Be30), 1.5 {I8} (1964Be23) for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.028 {I9} deduced from Ice(K)=0.022 {I7} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0388 {I10} here, consistent with M1, but it also gives |d(M2/E1)=0.63 {I17}; |a(K)exp=0.011 {I+14-5} (1964Be23) for a composite peak consistent with M1 but not E1,M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 781.97 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 781.975 {I17} (2015Do06). Other: 781.8 {I20} (1970Be30). 
RI$weighted average of 0.071 {I8} (1996TeZW), 0.0564 {I5} (2015Do06), and 0.09 {I5} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1291.7 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1291.89 {I11} (1996TeZW), and 1291.8 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.2 {I1} (1970Be30), 0.18 {I4} (1971Vi15), 0.106 {I10} (1996TeZW), and 0.127 {I1} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0073 {I8}, from Ice(K)=0.019 {I2} and I|g=0.127 {I2} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=1.00 {I+14-12}, with the former more likely. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0039 {I20} (1970Be30), 0.0052 {I+23-15} (1971Vi15), >0.0024 (1964Be23) 
$Ice(K)=0.019 {I2}, from 1971Vi15. Others: 0.015 {I4} (1964Be23) and 0.0200 {I20} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1592.46 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1592.495 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1592.4 {I3} (1971Vi15); 1592.9 {I1} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
RI$weighted average of 1.85 {I10} (1996TeZW) and 1.68 {I2} (2015Do06). Others: 6.0 {I6} (1971Vi15) and 2.8 {I3} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
$|a(total)exp=0.003 {I1} for a gamma line at 1590 {I20} (1956Th11). 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0039 {I4} deduced from Ice(K)=0.134 {I12} (1971Vi15) and I|g=1.69 {I3} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.88 {I+11-10}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.2 {I6} or -0.4 {I5} for J(2214)=1 and +0.3 {I9} or 0.0 {I6} for J(2214)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0031 {I9} (1970Be30) and >0.0033 (1964Be23) for a composite peak, consistent with M1 
$(1592|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I10}. 
$(1592|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I17}. 
$Other Ice(K): 0.170 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.200 {I20} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1885.9 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1885.86 {I6} (1996TeZW), and 1886.078 {I14} (2015Do06). Other: 1886.50 {I5} (1974HeYW), 1886.8 {I3} (1960Ba17), 1886.50 {I15} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
RI$weighted average of 2.1 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 2.65 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 5.7 {I9} (1971Vi15), 5.3 {I3} (1974HeYW), 5.84 {I25} (1964Be23), and 5.4 {I3} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
$|a(total)exp=0.0014 {I4} for a gamma line at 1890 {I15} (1956Th11). 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.156 {I15} (1971Vi15) and I|g=2.64 {I6} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=1.00 {I+14-12}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.26 {I3} for J(2214)=1, +0.25 {I4} for J(2214)=2 from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.00207 {I12} (1970Be30) and 0.00192 {I+27-24} (1964Be23) for a composite peak, consistent with M1. 
$(1886|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I6}. 
$Other Ice(K): 0.230 {I4} (1964Be23) and 0.28 {I3} (1960Ba17) for for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 101.38 {I14} (1996TeZW) and 101.47 {I4} (2015Do06). Other: 101.4 {I3} (1971Vi15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0081 {I22} (1996TeZW) and 0.0099 {I6} (2015Do06) 
M$from |a(K)exp=4.0 {I15} deduced from Ice(K)=0.8 {I3} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0098 {I6} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 106.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), 106.48 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 106.52 {I4} (2015Do06). Other: 107.24 {I6} (1960Ba17) is discrepant and placed from the 1924 level by 1960Ba17 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.0137 {I25} (1996TeZW) 
M$from K/L1=8 {I4}, L1/L2>3.5 (1971Vi15); |a(K)exp=4.0 {I10} deduced from Ice(K)=1.2 {I3} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0146 {I6} here. Other: |a(L1)exp=8.0 {I8} deduced from Ice(L1)=2.4 {I2} (1960Ba17 and and 1964Be23) and I|g here gives Mult=M2, inconsistent with ce data above and |DJ|p, which could indicate a different transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 151.8 {I6} (1970Be30), 151.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), 151.91 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 151.799 {I17} (2015Do06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.108 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 0.117 {I2} (2015Do06) 0.092 {I12} (1977Vy01). Other: 0.10 {I5} (1970Be30) 
M$from L1/L2>9 and K/L1=5.7 {I12} in 1971Vi15, and |a(K)exp=1.35 {I13} deduced from Ice(K)=3.2 {I3} (1971Vi15) and adopted I|g=0.116 {I3} here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 162.6 {I3} (1971Vi15), 162.64 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 162.509 {I25} (2015Do06). Other: 163.6 {I3} (1974HeYW) and 163.4 {I3} for a composite peak. See also 163.4|g from 1961 level 
RI$weighted average of 0.039 {I3} (1996TeZW), 0.0413 {I13} (2015Do06), and 0.035 {I6} (1977Vy01). Other: 0.22 {I3} (1974HeYW) for a doublet 
M,MR$from L1/L2>5 and K/L1=6.2 {I16} (1971Vi15), and |a(K)=1.23 {I13} deduced from Ice(K)=1.03 {I10} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0407 {I13} here. Other |a(K)exp: 1.0 {I5} (1970Be30) for a composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 171.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), 171.91 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 171.822 {I18} (2015Do06). Other: 171.8 {I6} (1970Be30, unplaced) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.113 {I10} (1996TeZW), 0.100 {I10} (1977Vy01), 0.08 {I4} (1970Be30) 
M,MR$from L1/L2>8.4 and K/L1=7.3 {I14} (1971Vi15) and |a(K)exp=1.12 {I7} deduced from Ice(K)=2.56 {I14} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.112 {I2} here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 285.32 {I3} (1996TeZW), 285.312 {I14} (2015Do06), and 285.34 {I5} (1960Ba17). Others: 285.3 {I7} (1970Be30) and 285.3 {I3} (1971Vi15). Also placed from 1798 and 2398 levels by 1960Ba17. 
$Level-energy difference=285.160 
RI$weighted average of 0.09 {I3} (1970Be30), 0.081 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 0.0801 {I9} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.14 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.09 {I3} (1971Vi15) deduced from Ice(K)=0.15 {I5} and I|g=0.0802 {I9}. Other |d: +0.4 {I5} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Sign of |d from |g|g(|q) 
$(285|g)[1601|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.41 {I18}. 
$Ice(K)=0.225 {I24}, weighted average of 0.24 {I6} (1964Be23), 0.15 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.240 {I24} (1960Ba17). 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.137 {I15} deduced from Ice(K)=0.225 {I24} and I|g=0.0802 {I9} here gives |d(E2/M1)=1.5 {I+3-2} or |d(M2/E1)=0.35 {I3}, with the former consistent with |D|p=+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 291.2 {I3} (1971Vi15), 291.4 {I6} (1996TeZW), and 291.54 {I7} (2015Do06) 
$Level-energy difference=291.25 
RI$weighted average of 0.035 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 0.040 {I5} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.078 {I29} deduced from Ice(K)=0.061 {I21} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.038 {I5} here. Other |d=+0.8 {I6} from |g|g(|q) for J(2215)=2, inconsistent with |d from ce data 
$(291|g)[1342|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.13 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 418.41 {I12} (1996TeZW) and 418.197 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 418.06 {I20} (1970Be30) and 418.1 {I3} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.07 {I3} (1996TeZW); 0.130 {I15} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I11} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak gives |d(E2/M1)>3, but inconsistent with |DJ|p which requires E1 
$Ice(K)=0.073 {I29} (1971Vi15) for a composite peak, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 436.81 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 436.987 {I20} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.022 {I4} (1996TeZW) and 0.0195 {I6} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 544.78 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 544.831 {I17} (2015Do06). Others: 544.4 {I6} (1970Be30), 544.9 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 544.66 {I20} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.041 {I15} (1970Be30), 0.051 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.0399 {I8} (2015Do06). Other: <0.30 (1971Vi15) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.048 {I8} deduced from Ice(K)=0.039 {I6} and I|g=0.0400 {I9} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.7 or |d(M2/E1)=0.66 {I9}, with the former consistent with |DJ|p=+. Other |a(K)exp: 0.044 {I18} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.039 {I6}, unweighted average of 0.037 {I6} (1964Be23), 0.029 {I5} (1971Vi15), and 0.050 {I5} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 593.4 {I3} (1971Vi15), 593.319 {I16} (1996TeZW), and 593.386 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 593.70 {I5} (1974HeYW), 593.58 {I15} (1970Be30), and 593.72 {I11} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak 
RI$weighted average of 0.470 {I13} (1996TeZW) and 0.465 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.6 {I3} (1964Be23), 1.07 {I13} (1971Vi15), 0.746 {I41} (1970Be30), and 0.77 {I5} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.047 {I5} deduced from Ice(K)=0.45 {I5} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.465 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2 or |d(M2/E1)=0.80 {I8}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.25 {I18} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.031 {I4} (1970Be30) and 0.037 {I+51-17} (1964Be23) for a composite peak. 
$(593|g)[1293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I16}. 
$Other Ice(K): 0.57 {I6} (1960Ba17) and 0.47 {I5} (1964Be23) for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 668.16 {I20} (1970Be30), 668.27 {I10} (1974HeYW), 668.247 {I17} (1996TeZW), 668.240 {I14} (2015Do06), and 668.56 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.182 {I11} (1970Be30), 0.180 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 0.174 {I2} (2015Do06). Other: 0.17 {I2} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I3} (1970Be30), and 0.032 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0114 {I10} and I|g=0.175 {I2} here, give |d<0.3, and |DJ|p requires pure dipole 
$Ice(K)=0.114 {I10}, weighted average of 0.11 {I1} (1964Be23) and 0.120 {I12} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 703.42 {I15} (1970Be30), 703.6 {I3} (1971Vi15), 703.56 {I4} (1996TeZW), and 703.521 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 703.54 {I5} (1974HeYW) and 703.61 {I10} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.61 {I12} (1996TeZW), 0.71 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.773 {I10} (1971Vi15) and 0.66 {I6} (1974HeYW); 1.5 {I8} (1964Be23) for a composite peak 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0254 {I8} deduced from Ice(K)=0.34 {I1} and I|g=0.654 {I6} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=0.27 {I+9-13} or |d(M2/E1)=0.71 {I2}, with the former consistent with |d=+0.24 {I6} (or +1.46 {I19}) from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp=0.0236 {I22} (1970Be30) 
$(703|g)(1183|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.48 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I9}. 
$Ice(K)=0.34 {I1}, from 1964Be23. Others: 0.34 {I3} (1971Vi15) and 0.40 {I4} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 736.240 {I22} (1996TeZW) and 736.253 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 735.92 {I20} (1970Be30), 736.2 {I3} (1971Vi15), 736.23 {I15} (1974HeYW), and 736.45 {I15} (1960Ba17) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.208 {I16} (1970Be30), 0.233 {I11} (1971Vi15), 0.22 {I3} (1974HeYW), 0.171 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 0.174 {I2} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I3} (1971Vi15) and 0.0235 {I24} (1970Be30) gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3, but this transition feeding 0+ requires pure dipole. 
E$also placed from 2357 level by 1960Ba17. 
$Ice(K)=0.108 {I8}, weighted average of 0.100 {I6} (1964Be23), 0.125 {I11} (1971Vi15), and 0.120 {I12} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 948.31 {I15} (1970Be30), 948.2 {I2} (1971Vi15), 948.29 {I4} (1974HeYW), 948.310 {I9} (1996TeZW), 948.341 {I10} (2015Do06), and 948.40 {I12} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 3.7 {I3} (1964Be23), 3.71 {I19} (1970Be30), 3.96 {I19} (1971Vi15), 3.53 {I20} (1974HeYW), 3.76 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 3.62 {I3} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0118 {I+20-18} (1971Vi15), 0.0127 {I7} (1970Be30), 0.0126 {I+23-19} (1964Be23), and L1/L2=11.2 {I18}, L1/L3>72 (1970Ag05) give |d(E2/M1)<0.5, but this transition feeding 0+ requires pure dipole 
$Ice(K)=0.964 {I10}, weighted average of 0.963 {I10} (1964Be23), 0.96 {I9} (1971Vi15), and 1.10 {I11} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1593.63 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 1593.526 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1592.9 {I3} (1970Be30), 1593.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1592.9 {I1} (1974HeYW), and 1592.9 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 1.19 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 1.22 {I2} (2015Do06). Others: 2.7 {I8} (1970Be30), 6.0 {I6} (1971Vi15), and 2.8 {I3} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00285 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0712 {I7} (1971Vi15) and I|g=1.22 {I2} here gives |d(E2/M1)=0.74 {I8} and also |d(M2/E1)=0.64 {I2}; |a(K)exp=0.0031 {I9} (1970Be30) and >0.0033 (1964Be23) for a composite peak {I+27-24} consistent with M1. See also comments for 1592|g from 2214 level. 
$Other Ice(K): 0.170 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.200 {I20} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1887.0 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1886.89 {I6} (1996TeZW), and 1887.037 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1886.50 {I5} (1974HeYW), 1886.8 {I3} (1960Ba17), 1886.50 {I15} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
RI$unweighted average of 3.7 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 2.84 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 5.7 {I9} (1971Vi15), 5.3 {I3} (1974HeYW), 5.84 {I25} (1964Be23), and 5.4 {I3} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00167 {I25} deduced from Ice(K)=0.113 {I12} (1971Vi15) and I|g=3.3 {I4} here; |a(K)exp: 0.00207 {I12} (1970Be30) and 0.00192 {I+27-24} for a composite peak. See also comments for 1886|g from 2214 level 
MR$from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other: 1.4 {I+29-6} from ce data above 
$(1887|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.66 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.29 {I12}. 
$Other Ice(K): 0.230 {I4} (1964Be23) and 0.28 {I3} (1960Ba17) for for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2215.39 {I21} (1970Be30), 2215.5 {I4} (1971Vi15), 2215.15 {I15} (1974HeYW), 2215.47 {I6} (1996TeZW), 2215.515 {I14} (2015Do06), and 2215.6 {I7} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.292 {I19} (1964Be23), 0.282 {I22} (1970Be30), 0.289 {I19} (1971Vi15), 0.32 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.285 {I18} (1996TeZW), and 0.263 {I4} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00179 {I23} (1964Be23), 0.00185 {I23} (1970Be30), 0.0018 {I3} (1971Vi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Other: 807.1 {I3} (1996TeZW) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.033 {I8} (1996TeZW) and 0.0175 {I5} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1316.82 {I7} (1996TeZW) and 1316.858 {I14} (2015Do06). Other: 1317.3 {I13} (1970Be30) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.13 {I5} (1971Vi15), 0.118 {I8} (1996TeZW), 0.08 {I4} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1617.62 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1617.601 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1617.6 {I6} (1970Be30), 1617.73 {I15} (1974HeYW), and 1617.8 {I6} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.34 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.42 {I3} (1971Vi15), 0.34 {I4} (1974HeYW), 0.368 {I12} (1996TeZW), and 0.364 {I4} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00081 {I12} (1970Be30). |d=-0.5 {I18} or -2.1 {I24} from |g|g(|q) (1996TeZW) consistent with ce data. 
$(1618|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I11}. 
$(1618|g)[293|g](328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.42 {I11}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0065 {I9}, unweighted average of 0.0056 {I1} (1964Be23) and 0.0073 {I7} (1960Ba17). 
$|a(K)exp=0.00087 {I12}, from Ice(K)=0.0065 {I9} and I|g=0.365 {I4} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1911.1 {I6} (1970Be30), 1911.30 {I15} (1974HeYW), 1911.08 {I4} (1996TeZW), 1911.162 {I14} (2015Do06), and 1911.1 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.209 {I24} (1970Be30), 0.174 {I16} (1971Vi15), 0.21 {I3} (1974HeYW), and 0.209 {I10} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00065 {I23} (1970Be30). 
$Ice(K)=0.0028 {I9} (1964Be23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 243.66 {I17} (1996TeZW) and 243.65 {I3} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.015 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0122 {I7} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1665.42 {I13} (1996TeZW) and 1665.319 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.045 {I7} (1996TeZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1958.87 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1958.904 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1958.9 {I3} (1970Be30), 1958.74 {I20} (1974HeYW), and 1959.7 {I6} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.277 {I13} (1971Vi15), 0.288 {I13} (1996TeZW), and 0.271 {I3} (2015Do06). Others: 0.30 {I13} (1964Be23), 0.27 {I3} (1970Be30), and 0.26 {I4} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.0016 {I+20-8} (1964Be23). 
$Ice(K)=0.0115 {I12}, weighted average of 0.010 {I2} (1964Be23) and 0.0120 {I12} (1960Ba17). 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00206 {I22} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0115 {I12} and I|g=0.272 {I3} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.6 or |d(M2/E1)=0.75 {I9}, with the former more likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 189.1 {I3} from ce data with I|g=0.0063 {I12} deduced from Ice(K)=0.120 {I24} (1971Vi15). 
$Suggested (1971Vi15) placement with 811 level is incorrect since this |g not seen in {+194}Ir |b{+-} (171 d) and in in-beam |g-ray reactions where this level is strongly populated. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.89 {I+37-27} deduced from Ice(K)=0.120 {I24} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0066 {I10} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Other: 627.7 {I6} (1996TeZW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0061 {I17} (1996TeZW) and 0.0076 {I5} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 676.2 {I6} (1970Be30), 675.9 {I3} (1971Vi15), 675.75 {I11} (1996TeZW), 675.947 {I16} (2015Do06), and 676.1 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.4 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.10 {I3} (1970Be30), and 0.079 {I20} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.019 {I7} (1970Be30), and 0.034 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=0.049 {I8} and I|g=0.0707 {I7} here. 
$Ice(K)=0.049 {I8}, unweighted average of 0.037 {I7} (1964Be23), 0.064 {I7} (1971Vi15), and 0.046 {I5} (1960Ba17) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.034 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=0.049 {I8} and I|g=0.0707 {I7} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.4 or |d(M2/E1)=0.83 {I+15-13}, with the former consistent with |D|p=+. Other |a(K)exp: 0.019 {I7} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 818.87 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 818.854 {I18} (2015Do06). Others: 818.9 {I2} (1971Vi15) and 818.7 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.056 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 0.0542 {I7} (2015Do06). Other: 0.050 {I10} (1977Vy01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0200 {I22} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0223 {I24} and I|g=0.0543 {I7} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=0.83 {I9}, with only the former consistent with this transition feeding 0+, which requires pure dipole 
$Ice(K)=0.0223 {I24}, weighted average of 0.021 {I3} (1964Be23), 0.020 {I4} (1971Vi15), and 0.0240 {I24} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1031.0 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1030.9 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.017 {I5} (1996TeZW), 0.030 {I10} (1977Vy01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0135 {I12} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0048 {I4} and I|g=0.0173 {I5} here gives |d(E2/M1)<0.2 or |d(M2/E1)=1.05 {I12}, with only the former consistent with this transition feeding 0+, which requires pure dipole 
$Ice(K)=0.0048 {I4}, weighted average of 0.0042 {I7} (1964Be23) and 0.0051 {I5} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1675.9 {I3} (1996TeZW); 1675.9 {I6} (1970Be30), 1675.7 {I3} (1974HeYW), and 1675.9 {I5} (1960Ba17) for a composite peak 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.13 {I7} (1996TeZW); 0.17 {I5} (1970Be30), 0.226 {I25} (1971Vi15), and 0.27 {I4} (1974HeYW) for a composite peak 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I14} (1970Be30) for a composite peak 
$Ice(K)=0.0195 {I25}, unweighted average of 0.0170 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0220 {I22} (1960Ba17), for a composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1969.65 {I7} (1974HeYW), 1969.64 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 1969.690 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1969.63 {I20} (1970Be30) and 1970.1 {I3} (1960Ba17) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Others: 0.68 {I9} (1964Be23), 0.72 {I4} (1970Be30), 0.742 {I25} (1971Vi15), 0.71 {I7} (1974HeYW), and 0.80 {I3} (1996TeZW) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00184 {I13} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0283 {I20} and I|g=0.750 {I7} here, gives |d(E2/M1)=0.54 {I+29-33} or |d(M2/E1)=0.67 {I5}, with only the former consistent with |d=-0.35 {I4} from |g|g(|q) of 1996TeZW. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0019 {I+6-5} (1964Be23), 0.00184 {I18} (1970Be30), and 0.0017 {I5} (1971Vi15). 
$(1970|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I8}. 
$Ice(K)=0.0283 {I20}, weighted average of 0.0271 {I20} (1964Be23), 0.026 {I7} (1971Vi15), and 0.034 {I4} (1960Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2297.9 {I6} (1970Be30), 2298.2 {I3} (1974HeYW), 2298.41 {I14} (1996TeZW), 2298.167 {I17} (2015Do06), and 2298.7 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0453 {I25} (1971Vi15), 0.0424 {I5} (2015Do06), 0.046 {I8} (1970Be30), and 0.056 {I8} (1996TeZW). Other: 0.720 {I15} (1974HeYW) is discrepant. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00215 {I23} deduced from Ice(K)=0.00188 {I20} and I|g=0.0426 {I6} here. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0017 {I4} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.00188 {I20}, weighted average of 0.0016 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.00200 {I20} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 197.8 {I3} (1971Vi15), 198.16 {I20} (1996TeZW), and 197.79 {I6} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.009 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0069 {I16} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.3 {I+7-4} deduced from Ice(K)=0.19 {I3} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0071 {I16} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 1970Be30 and 1971Vi15 only; this transition could be the same transition in 1996TeZW and 2015Do06 which depopulates the 2003 level. See 1081|g from 2003 level. 
RI$limit from 2015Do06. Others: 0.05 {I3} (1970Be30), <0.15 (1971Vi15) 
$|a(K)exp=0.004 {I3} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1388.74 {I19} (1996TeZW) and 1389.119 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.026 {I7} (1996TeZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1500.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), 1500.92 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 1500.573 {I21} (2015Do06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.054 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 0.0421 {I5} (2015Do06). Other: 0.63 {I3} (1971Vi15) is discrepant, and it is most likely that it should read as 0.06 {I3} instead of 0.63 {I3}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0041 {I12} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0040 {I10} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.048 {I6} here, gives M1,E2, but |DJ|p=2+ requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1689.87 {I3} (1996TeZW) and 1689.839 {I14} (2015Do06). Others: 1690.1 {I6} (1970Be30), 1689.7 {I2} (1974HeYW), and 1690.2 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.20 {I6} (1970Be30), 0.28 {I4} (1971Vi15), 0.28 {I5} (1974HeYW), 0.202 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.212 {I2} (2015Do06) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I5} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0158 {I22} and I|g=0.213 {I3} here, give |d(E2/M1)<0.4 or |d(M2/E1)=0.95 {I+17-15}, with the former consistent with |D|p=+. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0034 {I11} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0158 {I22}, unweighted average of 0.0136 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.0180 {I18} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 1984.1 {I6} (1970Be30), 1983.3 {I4} (1971Vi15), 1983.39 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 1983.9 {I4} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.06 {I2} (1970Be30), 0.060 {I5} (1971Vi15), 0.070 {I7} (1996TeZW), and 0.0592 {I6} (2015Do06). Other: 0.21 {I11} (1964Be23) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0198 {I33} deduced from Ice(K)=0.024 {I4} and I|g=0.0593 {I6} here. This large value can be explained only by the presence of a strong E0 component. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0034 {I11} (1970Be30) 
CC$from 1.33(|a(K)exp), where |a(K)exp=0.0198 {I33} 
$Ice(K)=0.024 {I4}, unweighted average of 0.0225 {I20} (1964Be23), 0.018 {I3} (1971Vi15), and 0.030 {I3} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 2311.72 {I21} (1970Be30), 2312.01 {I15} (1974HeYW), 2311.86 {I8} (1996TeZW), and 2312.7 {I8} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.311 {I25} (1964Be23), 0.278 {I16} (1970Be30), 0.289 {I19} (1971Vi15), 0.308 {I20} (1996TeZW), and 0.286 {I4} (2015Do06). Other: 0.28 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00122 {I16} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0072 {I9} and I|g=0.287 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<1.7 or |d(M2/E1)=0.64 {I9}; but |DJ|p requires E2. Other |a(K)exp: 0.00110 {I9} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0072 {I9}, unweighted average of 0.0063 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.0080 {I8} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Level-energy difference=68.7 
RI$deduced from Ice(L1)=0.19 {I6} (1971Vi15) and calculated |a(L1)=2.35 from BrIcc assuming Mult=M1. I|g=0.041 {I13} if Mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 140.5 {I3} (1971Vi15), 140.547 {I23} (1996TeZW), and 140.494 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.079 {I5} (1996TeZW), 0.0865 {I17} (2015Do06), and 0.095 {I10} (1977Vy01) 
M$L1/L2=11.3 {I33}, K/L1=6 {I2}, and |a(K)exp=3.4 {I6} deduced from Ice(K)=6.0 {I10} (1971Vi15) and I|g=0.0860 {I19} here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$seen in ce data only (1960Ba17, 1964Be23, 1971Vi15); placement by 1971Vi15 
RI$not seen and only a limit given in 2015Do06. Other: 0.21 {I4} deduced from Ice(K)=0.027 {I4} (1971Vi15) and assumed Mult=E2; 0.078 {I12} if Mult=M1. The possibility of its being a higher multipolarity or an E0 transition still exists, however. 
$Ice(K)=0.013 {I4} (1964Be23), 0.0160 {I16} (1960Ba17), 0.027 {I4} (1971Vi15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$placement from 1960Ba17 and 1964Be23 only. See also the 1735 transition from 2064 level 
$Level-energy difference=1734.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$transition seen in ce data only (1960Ba17, 1964Be23, 1970Be30). |a(K)exp>0.014 (1964Be23) and >0.023 (1970Be30), are larger than any of pure Mult for this transition feeding 0+ g.s., and can be explained only by this transition being E0 
$Ice(K)=0.0066 {I5} (1964Be23), 0.0080 {I8} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1743.63 {I13} (1996TeZW) and 1743.918 {I18} (2015Do06) 
RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 0.041 {I5} (1996TeZW), 0.052 {I15} (1977Vy01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2365.56 {I20} (1974HeYW), 2366.07 {I12} (1996TeZW), 2365.919 {I17} (2015Do06), and 2366.1 {I8} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.070 {I6} (1964Be23), 0.076 {I11} (1970Be30), 0.083 {I8} (1971Vi15), 0.057 {I10} (1974HeYW), 0.086 {I10} (1996TeZW), and 0.0788 {I9} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I2} deduced from Ice(K)=0.0029 {I3} and I|g=0.0785 {I11} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=1.05 {I+15-13}, but the latter is ruled out by this transition feeding 0+. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0017 {I3} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.0029 {I3}, weighted average of 0.0027 {I3} (1964Be23) and 0.0030 {I3} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1474.20 {I13} (1996TeZW) and 1474.40 {I5} (2015Do06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.035 {I5} (1996TeZW) and 0.0271 {I8} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2015Do06. Other: 1775.82 {I21} with I|g=0.033 {I8} (1996TeZW) 
$Level-energy difference=1775.288 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Other: 2068.96 {I15} (1996TeZW), 2068.2 {I13} (1970Be30) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.03 {I2} (1970Be30), 0.0352 {I11} (1971Vi15), 0.028 {I5} (1996TeZW), and 0.0254 {I3} (2015Do06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2397.7 {I4} (1971Vi15), 2396.3 {I4} (1996TeZW), 2397.246 {I23} (2015Do06), and 2398.9 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0063 {I13} (1971Vi15), 0.007 {I3} (1996TeZW), and 0.0053 {I3} (2015Do06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0059 {I7} deduced from Ice(K)=0.00065 {I7} and I|g=0.0054 {I3} here, indicates Mult=M3, which is inconsistent with adopted J|p=2+ based on L(p,d)=1+3 from 1/2- 
$Ice(K)=0.00065 {I7}, weighted average of 0.00055 {I10} (1964Be23) and 0.00070 {I7} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2084.15 {I12} (1996TeZW), 2084.288 {I17} (2015Do06), and 2083.2 {I1.3} (1970Be30). See also 2085|g from 2085 level 
RI$unweighted average of 0.0578 {I10} (1971Vi15), 0.056 {I7} (1996TeZW), 0.0505 {I5} (2015Do06), and 0.07 {I4} (1970Be30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 2015Do06. Others: 2412.3 {I6} (1970Be30), 2412.98 {I21} (1996TeZW), and 2413.5 {I10} (1960Ba17) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0258 {I25} (1971Vi15) and 0.0235 {I4} (2015Do06). Others: 0.028 {I5} (1970Be30) and 0.028 {I7} (1996TeZW) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023 {I3} deduced from Ice(K)=0.00111 {I2} and I|g=0.0236 {I4} here, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.3 or |d(M2/E1)=1.5 {I+4-3}, but this transition feeding 0+ g.s. requires pure dipole. Other |a(K)exp: 0.0017 {I4} (1970Be30) 
$Ice(K)=0.00111 {I12}, weighted average of 0.00097 {I15} (1964Be23) and 0.00120 {I12} (1960Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(doublet)=5.0 {I8}. Separate intensities from |g|g data (1976Hj01) Other: 4.3 {I4} for a doublet (1974Ya03) 
$A{-2} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$78 {I4} for doublet. Separate intensities from |g|g data (1976Hj01). Other: 52.4 {I31} (1974Ya03), 49.7 {I5} (2006Le06)for doublet 
$A{-2} for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$6.4 {I10} for doublet. Separate intensities from |g|g (1976Hj01). Other: 1.7 {I2} (1974Ya03), 2.9 {I2} for doublet (2006Le06) 
$A{-2} for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Second possible placement with a 10+ level at 2862 (1984WuZX), but is less likely as discussed by 1996Wu07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=328.473 {I10}, I|g=100 {I1} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=328.448 {I14}, I|g=100.0 {I31} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=328.501 {I30}, I|g=100 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
$|g(|q) (1970Si17) shows L=1 for 1920|b to 328 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average 
$E|g=293.541 {I12}, I|g=19.1 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=293.541 {I14}, I|g=19.5 {I8} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=293.435 {I40}, I|g=18.1 {I15} (1974HeYW) 
MR$|d(E2/M1): from |g|g(|q) in {+194}Au |e decay 
$(294|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.115 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I2} (1974BeYP). Other: A{-2}=-0.071 {I42}, A{-4}=+0.31 {I7} (1962Bu03) 
$From A{-2}=-0.13 {I2} and A{-4}=0.00 {I2} for (301|g)(ce(K) 328)(|q) and (301|g)(ce(K) 294)(|q) (1967Al09), |d(294)=+8 {I2} and E0/E2=0.01-0.13; (645|g)(293|g)(|q) in 1975Ka42 gives |d=+27 {I5} 
$|a(K)exp gives |d=6.2 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$LWM weighted average 
$E|g=622.030 {I10}, I|g=2.56 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=621.971 {I19}, I|g=2.56 {I10} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=621.990 {I35}, I|g=2.52 {I18} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=111.4 {I4}, I|g=0.013 {I4} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03). This |g is not reported in 2016Kr06, but placed accepted in the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$E|g=300.756 {I10}, I|g=2.66 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=300.741 {I14}, I|g=2.66 {I11} (1976Cl03) 
$((301|g)(294|g)+(301|g)(294|g)(328|g))(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (1973Si22). Consistent with M1 or E2 for 301|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$E|g=594.287 {I10}, I|g=0.505 {I5} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=594.291 {I19}, I|g=0.477 {I15} (1976Cl03) 
$(594|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I6} (1973Si22). |d(594|g)>+50 or <-10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average 
$E|g=607.497 {I18}, I|g=0.0435 {I10} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=607.61 {I8}, I|g=0.030 {I3} (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=645.175 {I10}, I|g=9.02 {I9} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=645.146 {I20}, I|g=8.94 {I26} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=645.162 {I30}, I|g=9.14 {I60} (1974HeYW) 
$(645|g)(328|g+293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.107 {I56}, A{-4}=+0.32 {I7} (1962Bu03); A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.71 {I4} (1959Jo35). |g(|q) (1970Si17,1983Ri14) shows no anisotropy 
$(645|g)(293|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.049 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.340 {I8} (1975Ka42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=938.725 {I10}, I|g=4.57 {I13} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=938.690 {I23}, I|g=4.57 {I14} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=938.68 {I6}, I|g=4.56 {I30} (1974HeYW) 
$(939|g)(328|g)(|q): 1973Si22, 1976Cl03, 1975Ka42, 1965Ma10, 1962Bu03, 1960Ma19, 1959Jo35. See A{-2}, A{-4} coefficients below 
$A{-2}=+0.191 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.795 {I17} (1975Ka42) 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=+1.08 {I4} (1973Si22) 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I4}, A{-4}=+1.05 {I7} (1965Ma10) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.92 {I11} (1962Bu03) 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.87 {I4} (1960Ma19) 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.78 {I4} (1959Jo35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g from 2016Kr06 
$E|g=203.059 {I21}, I|g=0.0398 {I19} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=202.91 {I15}, I|g=0.023 {I5} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=621.295 {I36}, I|g=0.091 {I9} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=621.29 {I15}, I|g=0.073 {I10} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1104.073 {I10}, I|g=0.214 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1104.05 {I5}, I|g=0.198 {I8} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1104.17 {I13}, I|g=0.23 {I6} (1974HeYW) 
$(1104|g)(328|g)(|q): 1976Cl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=857.225 {I14}, I|g=0.0445 {I4} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=857.12 {I19}, I|g=0.054 {I6} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1150.800 {I10}, I|g=4.55 {I5} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1150.75 {I5}, I|g=4.56 {I15} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1150.94 {I10}, I|g=4.69 {I25} (1974HeYW) 
$(1151|g)(328|g)(|q): 1976Cl03, 1975Ka42, 1973Si22, 1965Ma10, 1962Bu03, 1960Ma19 
$A{-2}=+0.108 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.745 {I16} (1975Ka42) 
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.73 {I3} (1965Ma10) 
$A{-2}=+0.357, A{-4}=+1.14 (1962Bu03) 
$A{-2}=+0.128 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.85 {I4} (1960Ma19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$deduced from Branching in {+194}Au |e decay. Other: 0.021, from ce(K)(1479)/ce(K)(328|g)=0.037 (1960Ke09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$NRM-weighted average 
$E|g=700.693 {I14}, I|g=0.199 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=700.547 {I35}, I|g=0.190 {I31} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=700.68 {I8}, I|g=0.21 {I5} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=889.987 {I10}, I|g=0.402 {I4} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=889.976 {I35}, I|g=0.386 {I13} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=889.93 {I9}, I|g=0.39 {I8} (1974HeYW) 
MR$other: +1.51 {I40} from |g(|q) (1983Ri14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1183.540 {I10}, I|g=2.26 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1183.49 {I5}, I|g=2.32 {I8} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1183.68 {I14}, I|g=2.42 {I19} (1974HeYW) 
MR$others: +1.32 {I9} from |g(|q) (1983Ri14); +0.9 {I1} (1973Si22, from A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I5} for (1183|g)(328|g)(|q)); 1976Cl03 (value not explicitly given) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g and I|g from 1976Cl03. In 2016Kr06 and 1974HeYW, values are given for a doublet of 1511.98 and 1512.15 proposed in 1976Cl03 
$E|g=1512.072 {I14}, I|g=0.285 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1511.98 {I10}, I|g=0.180 {I22} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1512.6 {I2}, I|g=0.31 {I7} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=925.270 {I14}, I|g=0.108 {I1} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=925.26 {I6}, I|g=0.097 {I6} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=925.22 {I25}, I|g=0.08 {I3} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1218.813 {I10}, I|g=0.433 {I4} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1218.78 {I5}, I|g=0.429 {I17} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1219.00 {I15}, I|g=0.45 {I8} (1974HeYW) 
$(1219|g)(328|g)(|q) (1976Cl03) and |g(|q) (1983Ri14) are consistent with J=0 for 1547 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty for E|g was doubled in the least-squares fit procedure 
$E|g=699.331 {I29}, I|g=0.0362 {I7} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=699.49 {I36}, I|g=0.019 {I10} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1000.177 {I10}, I|g=0.363 {I4} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1000.12 {I4}, I|g=0.355 {I13} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1000.10 {I12}, I|g=0.38 {I8} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
$E|g=1293.726 {I14}, I|g=0.339 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1293.67 {I6}, I|g=0.352 {I23} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1294.20 {I20}, I|g=0.34 {I9} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 
MR$adopted |d(E2/M1) from (1294|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.37 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.30 {I13} (1973Si22). Others: 1.79 {I3} (from |g(|q), 1983Ri14), 1976Cl03 (value not explicitly given) 
CC$from {+194}Au |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1622.185 {I14}, I|g=0.474 {I5} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1622.20 {I8}, I|g=0.490 {I22} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1623.08 {I20}, I|g=0.45 {I8} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1048.656 {I14}, I|g=0.202 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1048.64 {I5}, I|g=0.199 {I9} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1048.68 {I10}, I|g=0.20 {I5} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1342.205 {I10}, I|g=0.305 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1342.16 {I6}, I|g=0.290 {I11} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1342.70 {I20}, I|g=0.32 {I9} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 
MR$others: -0.1 to -1.5 from (1342|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I12} (1973Si22). Other: 1976Cl03 (value not explicitly given) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1670.679 {I16}, I|g=0.0452 {I4} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1670.72 {I10}, I|g=0.0442 {I28} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1671.5 {I3}, I|g=0.05 {I2} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$I|g from 2016Kr06 
$E|g=1156.48 {I4}, I|g=0.0250 {I10} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1156.60 {I30}, I|g=0.014 {I3} (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=364.845 {I10}, I|g=0.335 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=364.867 {I15}, I|g=0.314 {I10} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=364.90 {I8}, I|g=0.32 {I9} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=530.186 {I14}, I|g=0.130 {I1} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=530.173 {I30}, I|g=0.121 {I5} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=530.23 {I10}, I|g=0.15 {I5} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1175.376 {I10}, I|g=0.449 {I4} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1175.38 {I5}, I|g=0.463 {I17} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1175.63 {I18}, I|g=0.43 {I12} (1974HeYW) 
$(1175|g)(622|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.054 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I3} (1974BeYP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1468.910 {I10}, I|g=1.42 {I1} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1468.91 {I7}, I|g=1.46 {I6} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1469.2 {I1}, I|g=1.53 {I12} (1974HeYW) 
$(1469|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1973Si22). |d(1469|g)=0.0 {I2}, consistent with E1. Others: 1976Cl03, 1965Ma10, 1953Kr07. Other: A{-2}=+0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.002 {I36} (1965Ma10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1797.406 {I14}, I|g=0.130 {I1} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1797.48 {I9}, I|g=0.134 {I7} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1798.3 {I4}, I|g=0.14 {I4} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1565.115 {I14}, I|g=0.161 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1565.15 {I8}, I|g=0.158 {I7} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1565.70 {I25}, I|g=0.20 {I4} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 
$(1565|g)(328|g)(|q): 1976Cl03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1924.323 {I28}, I|g=0.0155 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1924.42 {I14}, I|g=0.0136 {I13} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1926.0 {I5}, I|g=0.020 {I5} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Placement from 2016Kr06; unplaced in 1976Cl03 study. 
$E|g=1675.145 {I24}, I|g=0.0079 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1675.24 {I17}, I|g=0.0066 {I11} (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1715.241 {I25}, I|g=0.0108 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1715.28 {I11}, I|g=0.0100 {I9} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1716.0 {I3}, I|g=0.010 {I3} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=2043.727 {I17}, I|g=0.0541 {I5} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=2043.72 {I11}, I|g=0.0539 {I34} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=2045.8 {I5}, I|g=0.060 {I15} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1735.269 {I21}, I|g=0.0224 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1735.37 {I12}, I|g=0.0190 {I19} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1736.9 {I3}, I|g=0.020 {I5} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty for E|g was doubled in the least-squares fit procedure 
$E|g=1186.408 {I26}, I|g=0.0740 {I12} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1186.4 {I4}, I|g=0.064 {I12} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=1487.057 {I14}, I|g=0.131 {I1} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1487.05 {I8}, I|g=0.129 {I6} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1487.30 {I20}, I|g=0.16 {I3} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1780.568 {I17}, I|g=0.0341 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1780.69 {I11}, I|g=0.0396 {I28} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1782.0 {I3}, I|g=0.05 {I2} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1785.628 {I21}, I|g=0.0331 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1785.69 {I11}, I|g=0.0302 {I23} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1786.2 {I5}, I|g=0.04 {I1} (1974HeYW) 
$(1786|g)(328|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.13 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I14} (1965Ma10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=2114.096 {I26}, I|g=0.0196 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=2114.20 {I14}, I|g=0.0199 {I19} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=2116.0 {I5}, I|g=0.020 {I6} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g and I|g from 1976Cl03. In 2016Kr06 and 1974HeYW, values are given for a doublet of 1511.98 and 1512.15 proposed in 1976Cl03 
$E|g=1512.072 {I14}, I|g=0.285 {I3} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1512.15 {I21}, I|g=0.101 {I14} from |g|g-coin (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1512.6 {I2}, I|g=0.31 {I7} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=1805.726 {I14}, I|g=0.244 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1805.75 {I9}, I|g=0.249 {I13} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1807.0 {I5}, I|g=0.24 {I5} (1974HeYW). E|g not used in averaging 
$(1806|g)(328|g)(|q): 1976Cl03, 1965Ma10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$I|g is unweighted average. 
$E|g=1812.17 {I4}, I|g=0.0058 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1812.59 {I25}, I|g=0.0034 {I10} (1976Cl03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=1829.520 {I26}, I|g=0.0165 {I2} (2016Kr06) 
$E|g=1829.59 {I15}, I|g=0.0142 {I15} (1976Cl03) 
$E|g=1830.4 {I5}, I|g=0.020 {I5} (1974HeYW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$+1.2 {I2}. Others: +0.10 {I5} (1985Br31), +0.55 {I+31-20} (1970Br26), +1.1 {I2} (1982Ku22) from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Mult=E2 is discrepant with the conversion data from |b{+-} decay (3.8 h), which leads to mult=M1+E2 with |d=+1.7 {I+6-4}. The level scheme requires |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$seen in (n,|g), but energy is not consistent with placement from 455 level; no 325|g seen in (n,n'|g). Placement in |b{+-} decay may be wrong. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(306|g):I|g(456|g):I|g(496|g):I|g(565|g)=100:73:32:65 in (n,n'|g) suggest that perhaps too much of the 306|g intensity in |b{+-} decay is assigned to this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR M=E2(+M1), |d=1.9 {I+11-4} in {+194}Pt(n,|g), but |g to 9/2+ rules out (M1) component (evaluator). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from L-subshell ratios ({+195}Au decay); other |d=-0.16 {I2} (1972Ba22) |g-anisotropy 
(L1+L2)/L3=12.7 {I18} (1967Ba39). Other: 11.9 (1954Co29), 30.6 ({+195}Au |e decay). |a(exp)=9 {I5} (1952De34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI required for intensity balance at 98.9 level. 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g: 17.1 {I9} (1972PoZU), 20 (1972De67). 
MR from L-subshell ratios, sign from ce|g(|q): {+195}Au |e decay. 
|a(L1)exp|?807 (1954Co29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from doublet I|g=25.6 {I13} - I|g(M4,129.5|g)=0.74 {I4}; other doublet I|g: 25.6 {I13} (1972PoZU), 25.5 {I27} (1967Sc18) 
M consistent with K/L=0.44 {I6}, L1,2/L3=1.45 {I21} (1967Ba39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E av of 211.1 {I3} (1967Sc18) and 211.6 (1972PoZU) 
|a(K)exp: 0.48 {I7} (1967Ba39), 0.73 {I15} (1973Ja10, {+195}Ir |b{+-} decay) 
MR from Coul. ex. (1969Ku06) 
Other: I|g=0.315 {I36} (1967Sc18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Other: I|g=0.207 {I27} (1967Sc18) 
M from |a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp=100/10.4 {I14}/1.7 {I2} (1967Ba39) 
MR from Coul. ex. (1959Mc69,1966As02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1967Sc18. Other: 239.6 (1972PoZU) 
M from |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=1.0 {I2} (1973Ja10, 3.8-h {+195}Ir decay) 
Other: I|g=0.56 {I6} (1967Sc18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E from 1961Kr02. Others: 129.9 (1954Co29), 130.05 {I32} (1967Ba39). 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
TI$from intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M M=E2(+M1) with |d>2.0 (1987Ca03). But |g to 13/2+ rules out (M1) component (evaluator). 
MR |d>2.24 (1987Ca03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M M=E2(+M1) (1987Ca03). But |g to 9/2+ rules out (M1) component (evaluator). 
MR |d=1.9 {I+11-4} (1987Ca03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from 1965Ro09. 
MR from L-subshell ratios ({+195}Au decay), sign from 1972Ba22, 1965Ca12. Other |d=+0.129 {I26} p,|g(|q) (1966As02); +0.022 {I11} (1959Mc69). 
|a(K)exp=5.8 {I15} from K| x ray/I|g (1959Mc69) is in agreement with |d=0.13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1970Br26 
MR from |a(K)exp (1972HsZX). Others: +0.55 {I+31-20} (1970Br26) a,|g(|q), +0.10 {I5} (1985Br31), +1.1 {I2} (1982Ku22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from 1969Ku06 {+16}O,|g(|q). Others: +0.36 {I+3-4} (1970Br26), +0.37 {I2} (1959Mc69) a,|g(|q), +0.30 {I3} (1985Br31) a,|g(|q), +0.39 {I1} (1982Ku22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI 38 {I8} (1966Gr20) 
MR av: -0.13 {I3} (1959Mc69) a,|g(|q), -0.21 {I3} (1966As02) p,|g(|q), -0.24 {I4} (1982Ku22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Ja10 
RI from I|g(2.29 h and 3.67 h components)=45 {I2} and I|g(3.67 h component)=20.1 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI required for intensity balance at 98.9 level 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g=210 {I10} includes 2.29-h component 
MR,M$from L-subshell ratios ({+195}Au decay), sign from 1972Ba22, 1965Ca12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR,M from L-subshell ratios, sign from ce|g(|q): {+195}Au |e decay 
TI from intensity balance at 129.7 level and I|g-branching 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g=33 {I4} includes 2.29-h component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI from intensity balance at 129.7 level and I|g branching 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g=31 {I2} includes 2.29-h component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$ from {+194}Pt(n,|g), not observed in 1973Ja10. 
M,MR$from adopted gammas 
TI from intensity balance at 199.4 level. 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp: 1.4 {I5} (1973Ja10), 0.44 {I6} (1972HsZX, {+195}Au |e decay) 
MR,M from |a(K)exp (1972HsZX), sign from Coul. ex. (1970Br26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI from intensity balance at 211 level 
M from |a(K)exp=0.73 {I15} and |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=5 {I1} 
MR from Coul. ex. (1969Ku06) 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). Measured I|g=45 {I2} includes 2.29-h component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI doublet I|g=19 {I1}, I|g=1.3 (|g|g-coin) deexcites 449.7 level 
M |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=1.0 {I2} is close to E2 theory 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.50 {I10}, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=1.7 {I4} 
M from adopted |g radiations. Mult=E2 is discrepant with the conversion data from |b{+-} decay, which leads to mult=M1+E2 with |d=+1.7 {I+6-4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI from intensity balance at 612.7 level. 
RI from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). I|g=15 {I1} (1973Ja10) 
|a(K)exp=0.87 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972HsZX. Others: 98.904 {I10} (1974HeYW), 98.85 {I5} (1973Ja10, {+195}Pt |b{+-} decay (3.67 h)), 98.90 {I2} (1972PoZU,{+195}Pt IT decay (4.01 d)), 98.84 {I5} (1970Ah05), 98.84 {I20} (1970To19), 99.06 {I3} (1969Fi08), 98.8 {I3} (1967Sc18), 98.83 {I1} (1967Wa02), 98.9 {I5} (1965Ro19). 
MR from L-subshell ratios: 1975GaZE, 1974Av01, 1970Ah05, 1972HsZX. Others: -0.12 {I2} (1965Ca12) |g(|q,H,t) 
|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp: 100 {I3}/13.6 {I7}/3.83 {I23} (1970Ah05), 100/13.25 {I40}/3.75 {I20} (1972HsZX), 100/13.0 {I5}/3.53 {I17} (1974Av01), 100/13.5 {I7}/3.69 {I27} (1975GaZE). 
|a(K)exp=5.98 {I13}, |a(exp)=7.24 {I31} (1980Sa11); |a(exp)=7.13 (1987Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972HsZX. Others: 30.89 {I9} (1972PoZU, {+195}Pt IT (4.01 d) decay), 30.94 {I5} (1970Ah05), 30.80 {I6} (1970To19), 31.13 {I5} (1967Sc18),30.84 {I4} (1967Wa02). 
RI av of 6.8 {I4} (1970Ah05) and 7.1 {I4} (1972Ha21). Others: 9.31 (1964Go19), 12.3 {I18} (1965Ha13). 
MR 0.021 {I4} from L-subshell ratios (1970Ah05,1972HsZX), sign from ce|g(|q) (1968To04). Others: 0.014 {I3} with penetration parameter=+2.4 {I10} (1972HsZX) revised to +1.9 {I15} 
|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp: 100 {I4}/10.9 {I4}/1.8 {I2} (1970Ah05), 100/10.9 {I3}/1.8 {I7} (1972HsZX). Others: 1969Fi08, 1970To19, 1975GaZE. 
|a(M1)exp/|a(M2)exp/|a(M3)exp=100/12.1 {I6}/1.7 {I3} (1972HsZX). Other: 1970To19 
|a(L1)exp: 23 {I3} (1970Ah05), 28 {I4} (1969Fi08). |a(exp)=35 (1987Ch01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972HsZX. Others: 129.779 {I10} (1974HeYW), 129.70 {I5} (1973Ja10, {+195}Pt |b{+-} decay (3.67 h)), 129.79 {I2} (1972PoZU,{+195}Pt IT decay (4.01 d)), 129.78 {I3} (1970Ah05), 129.83 {I26} (1970To19), 129.91 {I3} (1969Fi08), 129.7 {I4} (1967Sc18). 
RI weighted av: 7.3 {I4} (1972HsZX), 7.6 {I4} (1972Ha21), 7.4 {I4} (1970Ah05) 7.2 {I7} (1967Sc18), 7.7 {I8} (1965Ha13), 8.0 {I5} (1974HeYW). Other: 8.38 (1964Go19). 
|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp: 10 {I2}/100/81 {I9} (1975GaZE), 11.7 {I5}/100/76.7 {I14} (1972HsZX), 7.3 {I22}/100 {I9}/73 {I7} (1970To19) 
|a(K)exp=0.35 {I12}, |a(exp)=1.76 {I19} (1969Fi08,1980Sa11); |a(exp)=1.75 (1987Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972HsZX. Others: 199.53 {I3} (1974HeYW), 199.46 {I10} (1973Ja10, {+195}Pt |b{+-} decay (3.67 h)), 199.4 {I2} (1970Br26), 119.8 {I3} (1967Sc18). 
RI av: 0.078 {I8} (1974HeYW), 0.080 {I8} (1972HsZX). Other: 0.093 {I10} (1967Sc18). 
MR from |a(K)exp=0.44 {I6} (1972HsZX), sign from 1970Br26 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1982Wa20 in {+194}Pt(n,|g). Others: 211.39 {I3} (1974HeYW), 211.32 {I10} (1973Ja10, {+195}Pt |b{+-} decay (3.67 h)), 209.6 {I4} (1970To19), 211.1 {I3} (1967Sc18), 211.2 {I3} (1965Ro09). 
RI av: 0.102 {I10} (1974HeYW), 0.10 {I1} (1972HsZX). Others: 0.12 {I1} (1967Sc18), 0.25 {I3} (1965Ha13). 
MR from Coul. ex. (1969Ku06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M based on |a(K)exp=0.0395 {I22} (1962Ja10),0.041 {I3} and 0.042 {I3} (1962Ge07), 0.0367 {I24} (1960De17), 0.042 {I3} (1956Th10). Supported by K/L=2.1 {I1}, L/M+=2.9 {I7}; see also {+196}Au |e decay and {+196}Pt Coulomb excitation. 
Measured prompt yrast |g production cross sections in {+196}Pt reaction with 1-250 MeV spallation neutrons (2001Ta31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR from {+196}Au |e decay (6.1669 d). 
M ce(E0)/I|g|?0.003 or 0.009 from Q{+2}=ce(E0)/ce(E2)|?0.05 or 0.17 with |a(K)=0.0529 from {+196}Au |e decay. 
$B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values corrected, B. Singh, Aug 13, 2021. Previous value of B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0158 {I7} in this dataset was incorrect since it corresponded to pure M1 for 332.98|g, not M1+E2, |d=-5.2 {I5}. Note that E0 admixture is considered insignificant, as indicated by measured ce(E0)/I|g|?0.003 or 0.009 in {+196}Au |e decay 
Measured prompt nonyrast |g production cross sections in {+196}Pt reaction with 1-250 MeV spallation neutrons (2001Ta31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) value edited, B. Singh, Aug 13, 2021. Previous value was 4|*10{+-6} {I4} in this dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Measured prompt yrast |g production cross sections in {+196}Pt reaction with 1-250 MeV spallation neutrons (2001Ta31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from K/L=2.7 {I8} in {+195}Pt(n,|g) E=thermal. 
Measured prompt nonyrast |g production cross sections in {+196}Pt reaction with 1-250 MeV spallation neutrons (2001Ta31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I|e: Ice(K)/|S I|g <0.01 (1982Ka28), |S I|g/I|g(779|g)=1.39 
$ce(K)<0.6 (1982Ka28) 
CEK ce(K) is given for per 1000 capture events where it is assumed that 80% percent of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state ce(K)<0.01% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1135-keV level (1982Ka28). 
X(E0)=B(E0)[0+ to 0+(0)]/B(E2)[0+ to 2+(356)]<0.005 (1982Ka28) in {+195}Pt(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
CC E3 |a(theory)'s mult. By 0.975 {I10} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
RI,E from {+196}Ir |b{+-} decay (1.40 h). 
M |g's to 2+, and from recommended upper limits for |g-ray strengths. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from recommended upper limits for |g-ray strengths. 
MR extrapolated using a theoretical model of Greiner (1966Gr32), see Coulomb excitation (1990Ma37). 
$1966GrZX reference corrected to 1966Gr32, B. Singh, Aug 13, 2021. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=26.9 {I11} (1982Ka28) 
CEK I|e is given for per 1000 capture events where it is assumed that 80% of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)=0.90% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1403-keV level (1982Ka28). 
TI I|e: From Ice(K)/|S I|g=0.90 (1982Ka28), |S I|g/I|g(1047|g)=1.024 
X(E0)=B(E0)[O+ to 0+(0)]/B(E2)[0+ to 2+(356)]=0.092 (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.016 {I6} consistent with E1+M2 or M1+E2. The decay scheme requires |D|p=yes. |a(K)exp gives |d=0.31 {I+9-11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
Measured prompt nonyrast |g production cross sections in {+196}Pt reaction with 1-250 MeV spallation neutrons (2001Ta31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.058 {I5} (1982Ka28) 
CEK Relative to 1249|g intensity as 100 from 1982Ka28. 
M from |a(K)exp in {+195}Pt(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=1.6 {I3} 
$|a(K)exp=0.089 {I11} (1982Ka28) 
CEK Relative to 1678|g intensity as 100 from 1982Ka28. 
$|a(K)(E2)=0.0046; |a(K)(M1)=0.015 
M from |a(K)exp in {+195}Pt(n,|g) E=thermal. E0 violates the O(6) selection rules for both |s and |t (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)<0.6 (1982Ka28) 
CEK I|e is given for 1000 capture events where it is assumed that 80% of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)<0.08% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1823-keV level (1982Ka28). 
X(E0)=B(E0)(0+ to 0+(0))/B(E2)(0+ to 2+(356))<0.03 (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(K)|<0.06 
$|a(K)exp<0.02 (1982Ka28) 
CEK Relative to 1492|g intensity as 100 from 1982Ka28. 
M from {+195}Pt(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=1.4 {I2} (1982Ka28) 
CEK I|e is given for 1000 capture events where it is assumed that 80% of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)=0.088% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1919-keV level (1982Ka28). 
X(E0)=B(E0)[0+ to 0+(0)]/B(E2)[0+ to 2+(356)]=0.060 (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2,M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M |g's to 6+. 
MR extrapolated using a theoretical model of Greiner (1966GrZX) see Coulomb excitation (1990Ma37). 
1966GrZX: w.greiner nucl.phys. 80 {I417} (1966). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=1.1 {I2} (1982Ka28) 
CEK I|e is given for 1000 capture events where it is assumed that 80% of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)=0.085% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 2199-keV level (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from level scheme deduced by evaluators, E|g=1558.1 keV from fig. 2 and table 1 of 1993Di05 may misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)/(1+|a) and required for intensity balance at 689 and 1136 level. Measured I|g: 31.8 {I12} (1977Ha32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M supported by K/L=2.1 {I1}, L/M+=2.9 {I7}. 
M see also {+196}Au |e decay and {+196}Pt Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M supported by |a(L)exp=2.8 {I5}, L/M+=3.9 {I5}; 
RI$Required for intensity balance at 1271 and 1374 level. Measured I|g: 17 {I2} (1968Ja06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1961Be14, 1976HeZF; also 355.68 {I6} (1960De17, calibration correction by evaluators) 
M supported by |a(K)exp: 0.0395 {I22} (1962Ja10), 0.041 {I3} and 0.042 {I3} (1962Ge07), 0.0367 {I24} (1960De17), 0.042 {I3} (1956Th10). Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0404, |a(K)(M1)=0.165 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.051, |a(L)=0.021 (from |a(K)exp and K/L/M+N+O from E2 theory) 
E from 1961Be14 
RI from 1967Ja02 
M based upon angular correlation; see comment under |d. Also from |a(K)exp: 0.059 {I4} (1956Th10), 0.056 {I3} (1962Ge07), 0.048 {I5} (1967Ja02,1963Ik01); also 1961Be14, theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.050, |a(K)(M1)=0.253. 
M theory predicts that monopole internal conversion transitions between states of equal J|p can compete with E2 transitions. Although conversion coefficients may be too insensitive to detect E0 admixtures, angular correlations have been so used. Two solutions have been identified. Q, |l: -0.22 {I7}, 2 {I6}, and +0.39 {I5}, 68 {I12} (1965Pe06); -0.25 {I11}, 2 {I7}, and +0.42 {I6}, 62 {I15} (1968IkZZ); -0.23 {I+16-20}, 6 {I9}, and +0.44 {I+9-10}, 67 {I11} (1971Do12). Q**2=(E0 ce)/(E2 ce) and |l=penetration factor. See also 1955Ch65, 1956Ch21, 1958Ch48, 1958Ge37, 1962Ge07 
MR 5.2 adopted. 
MR from angular correlation measurements: |d=-5 {I1} (1953St05), |d=-5.0 {I5} (1963Ik01), |d=-4.9 {I2} (1965Pe06), |d=-4.03 {I12} (1969Ha43), |d=-5.7 {I3} (1971Kr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from 1967Ja02; also |a(K)exp(689)/|a(K)exp(356)<2|*10{+-5} (1963Ik01), |a(K)exp(689)/|a(K)exp(333)<1/12000 (1957Al45), I|g=0.003 {I2} (1962Wa16), I|g(688.7)/ I|g(333.0)|<6.|*10{+-5} (1972Be53) 
M |a(K)exp=0.006 {I6} (1967Ja02,1963Ik01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1967Ja02, also 521.3 {I7} (1962Wa16) 
RI from 1967Ja02, also 1963Ik01 
M supported by |a(K)exp=0.015 {I2} (Ice(K) from 1963Ik01, I|g from 1967Ja02). |a(K)(theory)=0.017; see also {+196}Ir(1.4-h) |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E|g,I|g: from 1967Ja02 
M |a(K)exp=0.029 {I10} (if the 645 K-line of 1963Ik01 may be identified with the 659.5|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E placement based upon observation of coin with 356|g and absence of coin with either 333 or 326 |g. See also {+196}Ir |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E|g,I|g: from 1967Ja02; also 1963Ik01,1962Wa16 
M supported by |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I2} (1967Ja02,1963Ik01), also 1961Be14; theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.0015 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(|g+ce)=Ice: from I(cek)/I|g(779|g)<0.00021 {I3} (1982Ka28), and ce(E0)/ce(K)(E0)=1.16 (1969Ha61). 
CEK K-electron intensity I|e is given per 100 capture events where it is assumed that 80 percent of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)<0.01% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1135-keV level (1982Ka28). 
From X(E0)=B(E0)(to 0+(0))/B(E2)(to 2+(356)) <0.005 (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI I|g=2.3 {I2} for 100 n-capture events (1982Ka28). 
BE2 From T{-1/2}>1.29 ps for lower limit, B(E2)<0.023 from T{-1/2}>1.9 ps for upper limit (1990Bo29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(|g+ce)=Ice: from I(cek)/I|g(1047|g)=0.0117 {I11} (1982Ka28), and ce(E0)/ce(K)(E0)=1.16 (1969Ha61). Other: ce(K)=11 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.009 {I2} (1971Wa24, see footnote on mult). 
CEK K-electron intensity I|e is given per 100 capture events where it is assumed that 80 percent of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)=0.90% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1403-keV level (1982Ka28). 
From X(E0)=B(E0)(to 0+(0))/B(E2)(to 2+(356))=0.092 (1982Ka28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
CEK Relative to I|g(1677|g)=15 {I2} from 1982Ka28. Other: ce(K)=7 {I2} (1971Wa24, relative to ce(K)(356)=1420 {I55}). 
$|a(K)(E2)=0.0046; |a(K)(M1)=0.015 
M E0 violates the O(6) selection rules for both |s and |t (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(|g+ce)=Ice: from I(cek)/I|g(1467|g)<0.00095 {I9} (1982Ka28), and ce(E0)/ce(K)(E0)=1.16 (1969Ha61). 
CEK K-electron intensity I|e is given per 100 capture events where it is assumed that 80 percent of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)<0.08% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1823-keV level (1982Ka28). 
From X(E0)=B(E0)(to 0+(0))/B(E2)(to 2+(356)) <0.03 (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(|g+ce)=Ice: from I(cek)/I|g(1563|g)=0.0014 {I2} (1982Ka28), and ce(E0)/ce(K)(E0)=1.16 (1969Ha61). 
CEK K-electron intensity I|e is given per 100 capture events where it is assumed that 80 percent of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)=0.088% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 1919-keV level (1982Ka28). 
From X(E0)=B(E0)(to 0+(0))/B(E2)(to 2+(356))=0.060 (1982Ka28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(|g+ce)=Ice: from I(cek)/I(cek)(1402.7|g)=0.041 {I8} (1982Ka28) and ce(E0)/ce(K)(E0)=1.16 (1969Ha61). 
CEK K-electron intensity I|e is given per 100 capture events where it is assumed that 80 percent of capture events populate the 2(1)+ state. ce(K)=0.085% for E0 branch, relative to the total depopulating intensity from 2199-keV level (1982Ka28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E I|g=0.10 from 1970Or05. I|g would be 2.2 on the scale of 1979Ci04 it seems unlikely that they would not have seen it if it really belonged to {+196}Pt. 1979Ci04 show no |g to g.s. from the 2345 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from level scheme deduced by evaluators, E|g=1558.1 keV from fig. 2 and table 1 of 1993Di05 may be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$If M=E2 |a=0.0396; |a(K)=0.0278; |a(L)=0.0089; |a(M)=0.00219; |a(N+..)=0.00067 
M from recommended upper limits for |g-ray strengths. 
MR extrapolated using a theoretical model of GREINER (1966GrZX) 
1966GrZX: w.greiner nucl. Phys.80,417 (1966). 
RI 417|g:604|g:938|g=13:75:12 (1981Bo32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI the probability of directly populating the 355.7 level has been reported by 1974Wa22 as 0.12 {I3} per muon capture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)>0.063 (2015Jo01) from T{-1/2}<8.3 ps. B(E2)(W.u.)<0.41 (2015Jo01) from T{-1/2}>1.3 ps in 1990Bo29: Phys. Rev. C42, 2271(R) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)>0.78 (2015Jo01) from T{-1/2}<8.3 ps. B(E2)(W.u.)<5 (2015Jo01) from T{-1/2}>1.3 ps in 1990Bo29 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.16 {I3} (2015WaAA) 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=24 {I5} 
E$presence of this transition is deduced from |g|g-coin evidence, energy is from level-energy difference, uncertainty is deduced by compiler 
RI$from intensity balance consideration and total conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.16 {I3} (2015Wa34) 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=24 {I5} 
E$presence of this transition is deduced from |g|g-coin evidence, energy is from level-energy difference, uncertainty is deduced by compiler 
RI$from intensity balance consideration and total conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$26.378 {I50} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(333.0)/I|g(355.7|g)=26.587 {I154}, 26.320 {I135}, 26.493 {I122}, 26.665 {I182}, 26.720 {I271}, 26.801 {I534}, 26.717 {I344} and 26.301 {I50}. I|g(333.0)/I|g(355.7|g)=26.378 {I73} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.0525 {I43} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(521.2)/I|g(355.7|g)=0.040 {I19}, 0.057 {I10}, 0.064 {I21}, 0.049 {I25} and 0.052 {I5}. Same value in authors' Table 8. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.126 {I12} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(326.4)/I|g(355.7|g)=0.174 {I36}, 0.104 {I30} and 0.124 {I12}. Same value in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.0547 {I38} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(758.3)/I|g(355.7|g)=0.080 {I42}, 0.052 {I10} and 0.055 {I4}. Same value in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.1912 {I62} in Table 7 of 2020Mo24 from weighted average of I|g(1091.3)/I|g(355.7|g)=0.277 {I55}, 0.223 {I37}, 0.189 {I16}, 0.186 {I34}, 0.254 {I96} and 0.189 {I7}. I|g(1091.3)/I|g(355.7|g)=0.1912 {I63} in Table 8 of 2020Mo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$%I|g=0.036 {I4} relative to 333|g, 0.036 {I4} relative to 355.7|g, and 0.035 {I4} relative to 426.1| (2023Kr10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$%I|g=0.046 {I5} relative to 333|g, 0.045 {I4} relative to 355.7|g, and 0.044 {I6} relative to 426.1| (2023Kr10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$%I|g=0.180 {I9} relative to 333|g, 0.176 {I8} relative to 355.7|g, and 0.172 {I9} relative to 426.1| (2023Kr10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from (n,|g) (1978Ya07); not reported in decay studies but required by intensity balance arguments 
LC=2.496, MC=0.578, NC+=0.1813, CC=3.26 IF MULT=M1; 
LC=15.48, MC=4.01, NC+=1.209, CC=20.70 IF MULT=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
KC=0.351, LC=0.0575, MC=0.01322, NC+=0.00414, CC=0.426 IF MULT=M1 
KC=0.0809, LC=0.0435, MC=0.01092, NC+=0.00334, CC=0.1387 IF MULT=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
KC=0.554, LC=0.0911, MC=0.2096, NC+=0.00656, CC=0.673 IF MULT=M1 
KC=0.1229, LC=0.0842, MC=0.0213, NC+=0.0065, CC=0.2349 IF MULT=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
KC=0.447, LC=0.0732, MC=0.01685, NC+=0.00527, CC=0.542 IF MULT=M1 
KC=0.1008, LC=0.0614, MC=0.01548, NC+=0.00473, CC=0.1824 IF MULT=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
KC=1.561, LC=0.259, MC=0.0596, NC+=0.01879, CC=1.898 IF MULT=M1 
KC=0.310, LC=0.407, MC=0.1042, NC+=0.319, CC=0.853 IF MULT=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
KC=0.1171, LC=0.01903, MC=0.00436, NC+=0.00136, CC=0.1419 IF MULT=M1 
KC=0.0299, LC=0.00990, MC=0.00243, NC+=0.00075, CC=0.0430 IF MULT=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1976PeZW. Other: 52.95 {I5} (1965Em01) 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a 
TI from intensity balance at the 53 level 
M deduced from L2/L3|?1 (1965Em01) 
(346|g)(53|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.166 {I15} (1982So05,1981Sa30), consistent with theoretical value of solid angular corrections A{-2}=+0.170. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E from 1974Al25. Other: 346.5 {I3} (1965Em01) 
M deduced from K/L=1.8 {I2}, |a(K)exp=4.02 {I8} (1987Vi08), 3.9 {I4} (ce/|g) (1965Ha15) semi, |a(exp)=7.7 {I4} (1983La26). Others: 1948Ho37, 1964Pr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1959Wa15 
TI$calculated from intensity balance; I|g|?3.3 from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M deduced from |a(exp)=20-25 (1959Wa15); theory: |a(E1)=1.8 {I4}, |a(E2)=1060 {I400} 
CC uncertainty in |a due to |DE 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from 1973Ur01 
M from |a(K)exp=0.087 (from (K| x ray)/|g, 1959Wa15) and T{-1/2}; theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0322, |a(K)(E3)=0.0852, |a(K)(E4)=0.225, |a(K)(M1)=0.127. 
B(E3)(W.u.)=2.26|*10{+-5} {I7}; |g transition is highly hindered, consistent with core-excitation model 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g-ray not observed, but (E0) mult suggested from e{+-} measurements in {+198}Pt(t,p|g) (1988Ya03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M$|g-ray not observed, but (E0) mult suggested from the observed weak ce line (1988Ya03). The placement is tentative 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from the observed 925 keV {I13} and 986 keV {I3} K- and L-ce lines in coincidence with 367|g in 2013Mo20 (B{-e{+-}}(K)=78.395 keV and B{-e{+-}}(L)=13.880 keV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from the observed 925 keV {I13} and 986 keV {I3} K- and L-ce lines in coincidence with 367|g in 2013Mo20 (B{-e{+-}}(K)=78.395 keV and B{-e{+-}}(L)=13.880 keV) 
$B(M4)(W.u.)=0.38 {I+27-11}, by assuming %IT=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$It is stated in 2008StZY that a time-walk effect may have resulted in a lower observed intensity for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E In Table 6.1, 473.1|g and 191|g are shown depopulating the 1761.5 keV level. From the tentative {+176}Au level scheme shown in fig. 6.9, evaluator calculates the level energy as 1316+y keV. 191|g is not placed in the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$a small E0 admixture can not be completely ruled out (2017An16) 
$|a{-K}(exp)=3.3 {I6}, |a{-exp}=8.2 {I7} (2017An16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$not observed directly; energy and intensity is deduced based on 317|g, 112|g and 107|g in coincidence with the 6199 |a decay; I(45|g):I(152|g):I(362|g)=16 {I1}:37 {I4}:46 {I7} (2017An16). 
M$|a{-exp}|>50, could be M1+E2 or E2 (2017An16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$R(DCO)=1.5 {I7} and |a(exp)=0.58 {I23} in 2017Ve03,2014AlZX, based on the K x-ray intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(tot)exp=19.3 {I25}, from comparison of number of 50.2| events and the number of 50.2|g-60.0|g coincidences (2021Gi08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$E1 excluded by multipolarities of parallel decay paths; M1 excluded by number of observed Au K xrays (2021Gi08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$|a(tot)exp=6 {I2} for scenario 1 (which assumes 56.7|g collects most of the excitation from higher lying states and 0.386 {I7} for scenario 2 which assumes a possible deexcitation bypassing the 56.7|g (2021Gi08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M from {+183}Tl |a decay based on characteristics of ce-|a summing, low observed I(K| x ray) and intensity balance arguments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp) based in intensity balance and from characteristics of ce-|a summing in {+183}Tl |a decay (53.3 ms). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 190 {I16} from recoil-decay tagged spectrum in ({+90}Zr,p|g); 104 {I12} in {+104}Ru({+78}Kr,2np|g). 
M anisotropy in ({+90}Zr,p|g) consistent with |DJ=2 or D, |DJ=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M probably E2. Observed shape of summed |a spectrum when gated by 52|g is consistent with ce(L)(89)-|a summing; E1 would give negligible ce-|a summing, M1 would lead to different shape due to dominance of ce(K) over ce(L). Also, M1 is ruled out by the observed low I(K| x ray) (2004Ra28) and E1 by intensity balance at the 62+x level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
52|g is in prompt coincidence with both the 89|g and the 62|g. Placement is supported by 6384|a and 6333|a energy difference of 51 {I19} (2004Ra28). 
M |a(exp)=11.5 {I14} (based on I|a=83% {I4} and adopted |g normalization) rules out E1 and E2. Observed ce(L)-|a summing in spectrum gated by 89|g is consistent with M1 or E2 (2004Ra28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(RDT)=64 {I4} for doublet; I|g=34 {I4} in ({+78}Kr,2np|g). Coincident only with transitions in i{-13/2} band. 
M anisotropy R=1.09 {I5} for doublet whose other component is |DJ=2 based on level scheme; this value is lower than expected if this placement is also |DJ=2 (or D, |DJ=0). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(RDT)=37 {I3}; I|g=22.1 {I25} in ({+78}Kr,2np|g). Coincident only with transitions in i{-13/2} band. 
M anisotropy R=1.43 {I6}; consistent with |DJ=2 or D, |DJ=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Transition is shown in level scheme (fig. 2) but not in table 1 of 2004Mu16, so its placement is indicated as uncertain here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E 679.3 in ({+78}Kr,2np|g), 680.4 in ({+90}Zr,p|g). 
I|g(RDT)=9.4 {I19}; I|g=4.5 {I7} in ({+78}Kr,2np|g). 
M anisotropy R=1.14 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Placement not adopted; it differs from that in Adopted Levels, Gammas where this |g deexcites a (13/2-) level with almost identical energy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Transition is presumably a doublet feeding both the (11/2-) state shown here and the (13/2-) state in Adopted Levels, Gammas which the E2 242|g deexcites. 
M based on authors' estimate (unstated) of |a(exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)=0.9, assuming I(|g+ce)(261.5|g)=I(|g+ce)(152.5|g) in spectrum gated on 353.5|g and adopted mult(261.5|g)=(E2); rules out E1 and M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp, determined from I|g and I(K x-ray) in {+107}Ag({+78}Kr,2p|a|g) reaction at Jyvaskyla 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M DCO=0.64 {I80}; uncertainty may be a typographical error, but |DJ=2 placement would be inconsistent with a DCO of 0.64 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from ({+35}Cl,4n|g). Other: 164.9 from ({+29}Si,5n|g). 
RI unweighted average of 56 {I4} from ({+29}Si,5n|g) and 69 {I6} from ({+35}Cl,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E from ({+35}Cl,4n|g). Other: 266.5 from ({+29}Si,5n|g). 
RI from ({+29}Si,5n|g). Other I|g: 100 {I10} from ({+35}Cl,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Should have been seen in ({+29}Si,5n|g) also, but was not; the evaluator, therefore, shows placement as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M interpreted by 1984Ma41 as an anomalous E1 transition. 
CC 0.45 based on experimental conversion coefficients. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
35/2- to 27/2- in table I of 2005So01 is a misprint; it should be 35/2- to 31/2- as shown in authors' level scheme drawing. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d deduced by compiler from mult=M1+40% {I10} E2 in Table 1 of 2017Ve02. Note that in the text on page 12, authors quote K/L=3.2 {I5} and mult=M1+44% {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains |d(E2/M1)<0.65 from K-conversion coefficient, and <3.0 from L-conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
M L3/(L1+L2)=1.6 {I4}, L2<<L1 (1990Ed01). (L1+L2):L3:M:N:O=232 {I35}:397 {I60}:197 {I30}:45 {I7}:18 {I6} (2005Sa40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
TI from |S(I(|g+ce) to 68 level)=2870 {I230}. 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M L3/(L1+L2)=1.6 {I4}, L2<<L1 (1990Ed01); (L1+L2):L3:M:N:O=232 {I35}:397 {I60}:197 {I30}:45 {I7}:18 {I6} (2005Sa40). 
%I|g=0.0303 {I10} assuming recommended decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
TI from |S(I(|g+ce) to 72 level); no |e+|b{++} expected to level. 
M N1 and O conversion lines observed (2005Sa40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g coin; I|g=40 {I4} for doublet (2005Sa40). 
M |a(L1)exp=2.4 {I4}, M1:M2:M3=1.00:0.21:0.09 (2005Sa40) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<3.5, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.26 {I10}, |a(L3)exp|<0.08 (2005Sa40). 
E|g=146.0 {I3}, I|g=48 {I4}, unplaced |g in 1978Ne10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.8 {I5}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.45 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.09 {I4} (2005Sa40). M1+E2 (|d=0.59) also possible, but |D|p=yes from level scheme. 
E|g=141.6 {I3}, I|g=19 {I3} (1978Ne10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.10 {I2}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.012 {I4} (2005Sa40); |a(K)exp|?0.10 (1970FiZZ). 
E|g=156.2 {I2}, I|g=910 {I90} in 1978Ne10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=52 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=6.3 {I10}, L2:L3=1.00:0.36 {I10}, (M1+M2):M3=1.00:0.04 {I1} (2005Sa40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.39 {I7}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.06 {I7} (2005Sa40); |a(K)exp|?0.25 (1970FiZZ). 
E|g=259.0 {I1}, I|g=84 {I10} (1978Ne10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.38 {I7}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.07 {I2} (2005Sa40); |a(K)exp|?0.25 (1970FiZZ). 
E|g=262.3 {I1}, I|g=67 {I8} (1978Ne10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.28 {I8}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.08 {I3} (2005Sa40). 
E|g=295.1 {I1}, I|g=160 {I20} (1978Ne10), |a(K)exp=0.04 {I2} (1970FiZZ) for line which may be a 294.8|g+295.7|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g coin; I|g=40 {I4} for doublet (2005Sa40). 
M |a(L1)exp=2.4 {I4}, M1:M2:M3=1.00:0.21:0.09 (2005Sa40) for doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=14 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=2.3 {I5} (2005Sa40). |a(K)=4.78 {I15}; |a(L)=0.802 {I24}; |a(M)=0.186 {I6}; |a(N+..)=0.0593 {I18} if pure M1. 
CC approximate value; from |a(K)exp x 1.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.0 {I6}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.62 {I15}, |a(L3)exp|<0.15 (2005Sa40). 
E|g=126.5 {I3}, I|g=14 {I4} (1978Ne10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.4 {I4}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.27 {I6} (2005Sa40). 
E|g=159.1 {I4}, I|g=60 {I10} (1978Ne10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.04 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.05 {I2} (2005Sa40); |a(K)exp=0.07 {I3} (1970FiZZ). 
E|g=236.2 {I2}, I|g=1000 (1978Ne10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E from ce data, magnetic spectrometer (1983Be48,1987KiZV). 
M reported by 1987KiZV from ce data. 
B(E2)(W.u.)=200 {I120} is consistent with the expected collective E2 character of this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)=900 from |SIce (1982Bo27). 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3) exp=460:23:260:110:13:78 (1982Bo27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)=770 from |SIce (1982Bo27). 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
MR$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3) exp=100:230:250:18:50:70 (1982Bo27). |d=0.31 (1985Ab03). 
Placement in levels scheme based on 36|g-253|g, and 253|g-283|g coin (1988Ko22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)=525 {I175} from |SIce (1982Bo27). 
MR from ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3) exp=52 {I22}:17:18 (1982Bo27). 
Placement in level scheme based on 193|g-105|g coin (1988Ko22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(222.8|g doublet)=100 and I|g(222.8|g from 330 level)=5.7 {I6} (1988Pa15). 
MR$from |a(K)exp=0.51; ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=51:7.7:2:1.4 (1982Bo27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI |g|g and |gce measurements involving the 222.8|g from the 330 level give I|g(222.8|g)=7.1 {I15} (from I|g(222.8|g)/I|g(193.7|g)=0.53 {I10}) and I|g(222.8|g)=5.5 {I6} (from I|g(222.8|g)/I|g(321.4|g)/I|g(330.2|g)=100/161 {I16}/224 {I22}) (1988Pa15). I|g(222.8|g)=5.7 {I6} is a weighted average of these values. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.51 {I+18-19} (1988Pa15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M |d=0.07, from 287.3|g - 424.1|g cascade; |d=0.03, from 377.7|g - 424.1|g cascade, |g|g(|q) (1979De03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(ce,L1)=92.7, I(ce,L2)=233, I(ce,L3)=243, 
$L1/L2=0.40 {I3}, L1/L3=0.38 {I3}, L2/L3=0.96 {I3} 
MR$from %E2=17 {I3} (2013Sa43) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Based on I(|g+ce)=373~{I20} feeding 39~ns isomer (1992Ja01), assuming mult=M1 for 57|g and 315.4|g. 
M$D from RUL; |D|p=no favored by isomer systematics in heavier odd-odd Au isotopes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.23~{I3}; A{-4}=+0.02~{I4}; compatible with pure L=1. 
$Placement from 1992Ja01; however, see comment on 612.9 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.28~{I2}; A{-4}=+0.04~{I3} for 162.6|g+163.4|g doublet. If A{-2}=-0.55~{I10} (as expected) for 163.4|g, A{-2}(162.6|g)=-0.12~{I9}, characteristic of a D+Q, |DJ=1 transition (though pure D is also possible) (1992Ja01). 
$Placement from 1992Ja01; however, see comment on 612.9 level. |g not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp. |a(L1)exp=0.29 (1983Po10) gives |d(M1,E2)=0. However, the L1 peak in the fig. 3 spectrum of 1983Po10 appears slightly broader than other single-line peaks so could conceivably include the L2 peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$reported as doublet with I|g=59~{I6}. The entire I|g is needed to balance the feeding through the 228 level. The existence of this second transition is inferred from observed coincidence with the 252|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$%E0|?76 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.66 {I17} (1988Pa15), |a(K)exp=0.62 {I7} (1998Ru04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$%E0=81 {I4} (1988Pa15) 
CC$Estimated by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.77 {I7}, weighted average of |a(K)exp=0.96 {I11} (1998Ru04) and |a(K)exp=0.64 {I9} (1988Pa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$Estimated by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.057 {I7}, weighted average of |a(K)exp=0.069 {I11} (1998Ru04), |a(K)exp=0.039 {I8} (1978Bo05), and |a(K)exp=0.10 {I2} (1988Pa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M Assigned from an estimated M/N subshell ratio, observing a conversion electron spectrum (fig 5-1978Bo05) by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.66 {I17} (1988Pa15), %E0|?76, |a(K)exp=0.62 {I7} (1998Ru04) 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from the |a(K)exp values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.96 {I11} (1998Ru04), |a(K)exp=0.64 {I9} (1988Pa15) 
MR$%E0=81 {I4} (1988Pa15) 
CC$Estimated by the evaluator from the weighted average |a(K)exp=0.77 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.044 {I11} (1998Ru04), |a(K)exp=0.065 {I10} (1978Bo05) 
E$1978Bo05 placed this |g feeding the 674 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.069 {I11} (1998Ru04), |a(K)exp=0.039 {I8} (1978Bo05), |a(K)exp=0.10 {I2} (1988Pa15) 
CC$Estimated by the evaluator from the weighted average |a(K)exp=0.057 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$1998Ru04 assigned E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp=0.06 {I3} (indicates |d=1.8 {I7}), decay scheme requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by the evaluator from I(|g+ce)/(1+|a). I|g=6.5 {I13} (1978Bo05). 
M |a(L)exp=75 {I20}, L1/L2<0.1, L2/L3|?1.3 (1978Bo05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.52 {I6} (using the running gate method - 1998Ru04). 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from the |a(K)exp value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=0.59 {I7} (using the running gate method - 1998Ru04). E0+M1(+E2) in 1998Ru04, 270.9|g is a 1/2- to 1/2- transition and so E2 component is forbidden and dropped out by the evaluator. 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from the |a(K)exp value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.22 {I8} (using the running gate method - 1998Ru04). 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from the |a(K)exp value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.20 {I3} (using the running gate method - 1998Ru04). 
CC Estimated by the evaluator from the |a(K)exp value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.81 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.19 {I2} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.3 {I1} and linear polarization=-0.10 {I5} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.22 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I7} (1989Jo02) 
Placement is from (13/2-) state at 749.9 keV in 1989Jo02, but the level is not reported in 1989Bo10. 525.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-1.10 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.19 {I8} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.2 {I1} and linear polarization=-0.2 {I1} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I3} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.6 {I2} and linear polarization=0.4 {I2} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.7 {I2} and linear polarization=0.4 {I2} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.94 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.50 {I13} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.3 {I1} and linear polarization=-0.5 {I3} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.5 {I2} (1989Bo10) 
Placement is shown from 35/2+ state at 3810.9 keV in 1989Jo02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.15 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I2} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.4 {I1} (1989Bo10) 
MR From 55% E2 as mentioned in 1989Bo10 referring 1987ViZY. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I1} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.5 {I1} and Linear polarization=-0.35 {I10} (1989Bo10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Placement is from (29/2+) state at 2923 keV in 1989Jo02 but the state is not reported in 1989Bo10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I2} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.3 {I1} and linear polarization=-0.07 {I2} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.14 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I2} (1989Jo02); R{-DCO}=0.7 {I1} and linear polarization=-0.19 {I7} (1989Bo10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} (1989Jo02) 
E Placement is from (33/2+) state at 3677.2 keV in 1989Jo02 but the state is not reported in 1989Bo10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Uncertain placement from (31/2-) state at 2924.6 keV in 1989Jo02, and the state is not reported in 1989Bo10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.32 {I17}, A{-4}=-1.40 {I25} (1989Jo02) 
E This |g-ray is placed from (53/2-) state at 6216.3 keV in 1989Jo02 but the state is not reported in 1989Bo10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.08 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I15} (1989Jo02) 
E Placement is from (49/2-) state at 5428.5 keV in 1989Jo02 but the state is not reported in 1989Bo10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Placement from (59/2-) state at 6859.5 keV in 1989Jo02 but the state is not reported in 1989Bo10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)=1940 (1985Ab03). The value of I|g=11, also quoted by 1985Ab03, would give I(|g+ce)=3509, implying a large |b{++}+|e feeding to the 16.0 level 
M,MR$From M1/M2/M3=100/21/17 in 1985Ab03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce)=1790 {I90} (1985Ab03) and |a for E1 Mult. 
M$ L1/L2/L3=100/54/68 in 1985Ab03 allows E1 or M1+E2 with |d=0.38 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$365|g and 366|g are unresolved. I|g from |g|g 
For 365|g+366|g, A{-2}=-0.07 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I11}. The absence of transition to the (13-) level would argue against Mult.=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unresolved doublet. I|g from |g|g 
M$For the unresolved doublet, A{-2}=+0.40 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ from level-energy difference. A transition seems to be present in level-scheme figure 2 of 2010Fa19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$observed as M-conversion line in singles and ce-|g coin by 1975Be17. 
M$from the systematics of analogous transitions in heavier odd-A Au isotopes, a 15-20% E2 admixture in this transition is expected. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of values from {+189}Hg |e decay (7.6 m) (1996Wo04) and {+189}Hg |e decay (7.6 m+8.6 m) (1975Be17) 
MR$From |e decay (8.6 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from {+191}Ir(|a,6n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 |g from |g(|q), and M1(+E2), |d<1.1 from |a(exp) in ({+12}C,4n|g), but |DJ|p requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from ({+19}F,4n|g). Other: 103.5 for an unplaced |g in ({+12}C,4n|g). Not reported in the other two high-spin studies 
RI$260 {I10} for 103.5-keV unplaced |g in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g), assuming 217.8|g in that reaction is the same as 218.6|g from ({+19}F,6n|g) and 219 or 218 in ({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$observed as M-conversion line in singles and ce-|g coin by 1975Be17. 
TI$from intensity balance by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L3/K taken from Table 2 of 1996Wo04 as the value listed in authors' Table 3 seems a misprint 
$|d=0.67 {I+14-15} from ce data in the present experiment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.055 {I1} from {+189g}Hg |e decay (1996Wo04). Other: |a(K)exp=0.019 {I5} from {+189}Hg |e decay (7.6 min+8.6 min) (1975Be17), implies a M1+E2 transition of |d|?1.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 2003Wu02 evaluation is inconsistent with |DJ|p; |a(K)exp=0.037 {I12} is consistent with M1 for the second component from the 2101.8 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Other: |a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} from {+189}Hg |e decay (7.6 min+8.6 min) (1975Be17), implies a pure E2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from table 3 of 1996Wo04. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I8} if I|g=2.5 {I10} is used. However, if I|g=4.5 {I5} from table 4 is used, |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} and |d=0.9 {I+16-8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$observed as M-conversion line in singles and ce-|g coin by 1975Be17. 
TI$deduced by evaluators from intensity balance argument 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$E2(+M1) (|d>3.0) from 1996Wo04 is not likely for |DJ=2 transition; also a(K)exp is consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 (|d>3.0) from 1996Wo04 is not likely for a |DJ=2 transition; also |a(K)exp is consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ 786.6 2 3.3 3 M1+E2 3.9 GT 0.011521 A |D\=2 transition makes an M1 component unlikely and the |a(K)exp is consistent with stretched E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$E2+M1,|d>0.2 from 1996Wo04 is inconsistent with |DJ=2 transition. Also |a(K)exp is consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$doublet. 
$Evaluators have corrected the K-electron intensity for contribution from the 670 keV transition that deexcites the 1383 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2,|d=0.8 {I+4-3} from 1996Wo04 is inconsistent with |DJ=2 transition, possible overlap with 682.2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2001MaZN, measured by recoil-catcher method. Uncertainty of 0.3 keV assigned by the evaluator. Other: 39 (1997Pe26,from Fig. 1); see {+174}Yb({+19}F,4n|g) dataset for 1997Pe26 and 2001MaZN 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$Placement from a 2451, 23/2- level in the Adopted dataset 
M$M1+E2 in 1975De20. Note that A{-2} is positive in |g(|q) data of 1979Go15 in (|a,6n|g) suggesting mult=(Q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$(E1) in 1975De20, however, this contradicts mult=Q in Adopted dataset taken from |g(|q) data in 1979Go15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$Transition related to 440-ns isomer and a fast component 
E$transition from this isomer is not reported or confirmed in later studies (1979Go15, 1992Ve05, 1992Bo23, 1993Pe17 and 1997Pe26). This |g is not included in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce)=6 for 65.1-keV transition relative to I|g(555.6|g)=63 {I5} in 2004Gu07, assuming M1 for 65.1-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce)=34 for 79.2-keV transition relative to I|g(249.6|g)=3 {I1} in 2004Gu07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance deduced I|g=2.0 instead of reported value of 1.4 
M,MR$from (L1+L2):L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O=1000:88:194:40:30:50:20 (1964Ja05). |a(L)exp=56 (1968Ki04). Uncertainties are probably 10% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 (1968Ki04), too low as compared to |a(K)(E1)=0.087. The line may be contributed by an impurity. The value of I|g=5.0 {I2} (1968Ki04) is also not in good agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 240.8 {I2} from {+191}Hg |e decay (49 min) and 241.4 {I5} from {+191}Hg |e decay (50.8 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 252.4 {I2} from {+191}Hg |e decay (49 min) and 252.6 {I4} from {+191}Hg |e decay (50.8 min) 
RI Other: 44 {I9} {+191}Hg |e decay (49 min) 
MR from {+191}Hg |e+|b{++} decay (50.8 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
CC$|a=1.38|*10{+7} {I20}, av of |a(13.7 keV)=1.19|*10{+7} and |a(13.1 keV)=1.57|*10{+7} (uncertainty due to 0.6 keV uncertainty in E|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 274.1 {I10} from {+191}Hg |e decay (50.8 min), 274.4 {I5} from ({+11}B,6n|g), and 274.1 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR Other: -0.9 {I+10-6} {+191}Ir(|a,4n|g) (1977Go12) 
E$weighted average of 357.0 {I4} from {+191}Hg |e decay (50.8 min), 357.0 {I5} from ({+11}B,6n|g), and 356.9 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 371.0 {I4} from {+191}Hg |e decay (50.8 min), 371.3 {I5} from ({+11}B,6n|g), and 371.0 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M Q in {+191}Ir(|a,4n|g) and RUL. In ({+11}B,6n|g) |a(K)exp suggest M1+E2 transition with |d=3.8 {I+7-5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in (|a,4n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.20 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.05 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, the values A{-2}=-0.4 {I1} and A{-4}=+0.07 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, the values A{-2}=-0.16 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.03 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.12 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.09 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
|DJ=2 from |g(|q) in ({+11}B,6n|g) and (|a,4n|g). Disagrees with Mult=M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.17 {I1} in ({+11}B,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in (|a,4n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.20 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.04 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D(+Q))
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.21 {I4} and A{-4}=+0.02 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.2 {I1} and A{-4}=+0.09 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.16 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.07 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.21 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.02 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
doublet in ({+11}B,6n|g) DCO analysis; A{-2}=+0.18 {I8} and A{-4}=-0.22 {I8} for the doublet are compatible with stretched E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is comparable for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=-0.3 {I1} and A{-4}=+0.6 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|g(|q) data in ({+11}B,6n|g) is consistent for a |DJ=1 transition, A{-2}=+0.05 {I8} and A{-4}=+0.4 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty assigned by the evaluator. |D(E|g)=1.5 keV quoted by 1997Sc22 seems in error in view of the uncertainties (0.2 to 0.5 keV) of other gamma rays in the band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Branching I|g(241|g)/I|g(252|g) not consistent with values from IT decay and {+191}Hg(50.8-min) |e decay, or with those from source I. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
TI from transition intensity balance at 252 level. 
M M2, M3, N,O lines observed in ce-spectrum. Absence of M1 line suggests E2 or E3 multipolarity. Multipolarity not E2 from RUL. 
This transition was also observed by 1954Gi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.31 {I8}, ce(K)/ce(L) exp=5.8 {I17} (1971Be61). 
MR from nuclear orientation (1985Va07). ce data yields 0.4 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.050 {I9}, ce(K)/ce(L) exp=5.9 {I14} (1971Be61). 
MR from nuclear orientation (1985Va07). ce data yields 0.0 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR From intensity flow in the level scheme, which requires stretched E2; mult=M1+E2 with |d=3.8 {I+7-5} from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Sign of A{-4} is incorrect for |DJ=2, stretched quadrupole transition, as required by level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M Q(+D) from |g(|q); deduced (E2) from decay scheme characteristics, see comment on J for 5141.2 level in adopted data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E From 1976Go22. Not listed in their latest publication 1979Go15. In 1976Go22, 674.2|g and 675.3|g are shown in their level schemes for {+191}Au and {+193}Au. In 1979Go15, only 674.8|g has been listed for {+193}Au in Table 3, which appears to be the average of 674.2|g and 675.3|g. This E|g not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) consistent with pure D, |DJ=1; 1982Ne05 favor E1, but evaluator considers this highly tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.26 {I7} assuming adopted decay scheme normalization. 
L1:L2:L3=100 {I4}:19.1 {I12}:13.3 {I7} (1971Ho04); L1:L2:L3=100:17:10, M1:M2:M3=100:16:13, L/M=4.2 (1963Ja11). 
E,MR from ce(L) data (1971Ho04). 
RI from I(|g+ce), as deduced from intensity balance at 31.6 level, and |a. I|g=26 {I6} from experiment (1968Ki04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
K/L1|?8.6, L1/L3|>8 (1963Ja11). 
Inconclusive coincidence data suggest possible second placement for 146.0|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
%I|g=7.2 {I12} assuming adopted decay scheme normalization. 
K/L=6.8, L1:L2:L3=97:10:<5; L/(M+N)=3.4 (1963Ja11). 
M from K/L and L subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
K/L|>4.5 (1963Ja11). 
Placement assumes 157.2|g-105.4|g coincidence; data are equally consistent with a 157.2|g-104.5|g cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1982Ne05) for contaminated line. 
RI combined value for 339.2|g and 340.7|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1982Ne05) for contaminated line. 
RI combined value for 339.2|g and 340.7|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced by authors using I(ce(L3)) and |a(L3)(E2 theory). 
M |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=8.5 {I9}, |a(M+...)exp|a(N+...)exp|a(O)ex p=6.1 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$From {+193}Hg |e decays (11.8 h) 
RI$Branching deduced using I(|g+ce) in {+193}Au IT decay (3.9 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_comment:
RI$Branching deduced using I(|g+ce) in {+193}Au IT decay (3.9 s) 
$Yields B(M4)(W.u.)=26 {I14}, note the value exceeds RUL=10 by 1 to 2 sigmas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$From (p,2n|g), in band transition. |a(K)exp=0.052 {I33} ({+193}Hg |e decay (11.8 h) indicates dominant E2 (>90%). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$From (p,2n|g). |a(K)exp=0.021 {I5} ({+193}Hg |e decay (11.8 h)) indicates M1+E2 with |d=1.5 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI from I(|g+ce)(38.22)=I(|g+ce)(219.75) in level scheme 
M from L1:L2:L3=42 {I4}:98 {I9}:100 
MR from L1/L3=0.50 {I10}, weighted average from 1970Fo08 and 1974ViZS ({+193}Hg (3.80 h) decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3=100:22 {I4}:4.7 {I+47-30} 
MR from weighted average of ce(L) ratios from 1970Fo08 and 1974ViZS ({+193}Hg (11.8 h) decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from 1974ViZS. 
M from (M1+M2+M3)/(M4+M5)=11.3 (1958Br88); other subshell ratios allow E2 or E3, but (M1+M2+M3)/(M4+M5)=71.2 (E2 theory), =9.13 (E3 theory) is consistent only with E3. L2/L3=0.65 (1954Gi04) 
TI from 99.97 - I(|g+ce)(289.8|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_comment:
E,TI from 1955Br41 
TI deduced from I(ce) relative to I(ce 257.97|g) and theoretical conversion coefficients (values not given by 1955Br41). 
TI upper limit |?3% from comparison of the ce-lines of the 290 and 256 transitions (1954Gi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M L1:L2:L3=205 {I12}: 320 {I20}: 330 {I20}; M1:M2:M3=43 {I5}: 85 {I9}: 95 {I9}. 
MR from L1/L3=0.50 {I10}, weighted average from 1974ViZS and 1970Fo08 ({+193}Au IT decay). 
TI I(|g+ce)(from equilibrium source) - I(|g+ce)(attributed to {+193}Hg(11.8 h) decay). I(|g+ce)=|SIce + I|g=11.7 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR L1:L2:L3=31 {I3}: 4.5 {I5}: 1.1 {I2}, K/L=6.0 {I7} 
TI |SIce + I|g; I|g=2.22 {I21} deduced from Ice(K)=2.20 {I15} and |a(K)=0.99 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=3.1 {I6} in equilibrium source less I|g=0.8 {I2} attributed to {+193}Hg (11.8 h) decay. 
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.081 {I14}, K/L1=5.7 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI estimated from coincidence data. It is not clear whether this |g belongs in this decay or the {+193}Hg (11.8 h) decay. See comment with the 539.0 level. 2014Th02 (p,2n|g) do not support this placement. Not adopted by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M From Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I16}, K/L12=6.1 {I13} (1974ViZS); Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00618 {I9}, K/L12=5.49 {I11}; |a(K)(M1+E2, |d=1.33 {40})=0.0101 20, K/L12=5.8 {i12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios (see {+193}Hg 3.80 h decay) 
MR from L1/L3=0.50 {I10}, weighted average from 1974ViZS and 1970Fo08 ({+193}Au IT decay). 
TI deduced from intensity balance at 38.2 level. I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(219.75|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI measured I|g=3.3 {I5} adjusted for contribution the {+193}Hg (3.80 h) decay 
M |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3}, L1:L2:L3=4.6 {I4}: 15.2 {I30}: 10.0 {I10} (1974ViZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI measured I|g=58 {I6} adjusted for contribution from the {+193}Hg (3.80 h) decay. 
M |a(K)exp=0.40 {I8}, K/L=6.6 {I10}, L1:L2:L3=260 {I13}:67 {I3}:24 {I2} (1974ViZS). 
MR from ce(L) ratios from 1974ViZS and L1/L2=4.5 {I8} (1970Fo08 ({+193}Au IT decay)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp=280 {I110}, L1:L2:L3=0.28 {I11}: 29.7 {I30}: 34.3 {I34}, M2:M3:M4:M5=8.3 {I10}: 8.1 {I10}: 0.65 {I16}: 0.95 {I24} (1974ViZS). 
TI from |SIce. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI measured I|g=0.12 {I3} adjusted for contribution from 3.80 h {+193}Hg decay 
M |a(K)exp=0.008 {I4} (1974ViZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI measured I|g=6.0 {I8} adjusted for contribution from 3.80 h {+193}Hg decay 
M K:L1:L2=83 {I6}: 10.2 {I12}: 37 {I4}, M2:M3=12.3 {I12}: 7.6 {I12} (1974ViZS); K/L12=1.4, L12/L3>1.3 (1958Br88). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from intensity balance at 687.4 level 
|g shows composite T{-1/2} in pre-equilibrium source, therefore, some of measured I|g=1.6 {I3} belongs in the 3.80 h decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.024 {I6}, K/L=2.6 {I3}, L1:L2:L3=15.2 {I18}: 14.0 {I17}: 5.6 {I7} (1974ViZS); K/L=3.13, L12/L3=2.6 (1958Br88). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g calculated from Ice(K)=0.24 {I2} and |a(K)=0.265 {I21} 
M,MR K/L12=4.4 {I6}, L1/L2=4.6 {I9} (1974ViZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated from Ice(K)=0.023 {I12} and |a(K)=0.0154 
M K/L=3.5 {I19}, L1:L2:L3=0.35 {I3}: 0.22 {I3}: 0.08 {I2} (1974ViZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.032 {I5}, K/L12=5.7 {I32} (1974ViZS); K/L1=4.6 (1958Br88). 
MR from |g(|q) (|a,xn|g); |d=1.0 {I3} from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.13 {I3}, K/L=3.6 {I6}, L1:L2:L3=9.2 {I14}: 1.2 {I3}: 0.56 {I10} (1974ViZS); Other: |a(K)exp=0.0555 (1970Pl01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.052 {I33} (1974ViZS) indicates dominant E2 (>90%) component. See comments in adopted gammas. 


