# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.016 {I3}, |a(L1+L2)exp=0.0051 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.00055 {I24}, |a(M)exp=0.00155 {I40} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Absolute intensity per 100 |a decays= 22 {I3} (1967Ah02) 
M$From K:L12:M=0.9 {I2}: 2.0 {I2}: 0.8 {I1} (1967Ah02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI if I|b(to 42.7-keV level)=4.9%, the intensity balance at the 42.7-keV level yields I|g(42.7|g)=0.101 {I26} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=989.225 {I17} was measured by 1982Ho07 in {+249}Bk(n,|g){+250}Bk, followed by |b{+-} decay; I|g=21 {I4} per 100 neutron captures (1982Ho07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=1031.921 {I25} was measured by 1982Ho07 in {+249}Bk(n,|g){+250}Bk, followed by |b{+-} decay; I|g=14.1 {I27} per 100 neutron captures (1982Ho07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E|g=1028.1 {I4} was measured by 1982Ho07 in {+249}Bk(n,|g){+250}Bk, followed by |b{+-} decay; I|g=1.4 {I4} per 100 neutron captures (1982Ho07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition was seen in ce spectrum taken in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Total Ice=0.00095 {I18}, calculated from the branching for this E0 transition, measured in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay, and I|g(1111.5|g)=0.0024 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
The observed |g peak at 1175.5 keV had more than one component. Intensity of the 1175.5|g deexciting the 1218.5-keV level was obtained by 1979Re01 from comparison of singles and (L x-ray)(|g) coincidence spectra. Placement of the weaker component is not well established. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E from 2.22-h {+250}Cf |e decay. A peak observed by 1979Re01 at 1103.33 is assumed doublet: the measured intensity of the 1103-keV peak relative to 1201- and 1244-keV gammas deexciting the 1244-keV level does not agree with the relative intensities measured in {+250}Es |e decay. 
RI I|g(1103-keV peak)=0.0020 {I3} was measured. I|g(1103.0|g from 1244-keV level)=0.00076 {I26}, calculated from the adopted branching of I|g(1103|g)/I|g(1201.79|g)=0.072 and I|g(1201.79|g)=0.0105 {I6}. The remaining intensity, 0.0012, is assigned to second part of the doublet, not yet placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$K/Total ce=0.79 {I6}, L/Total ce=0.153 {I14}, M/Total ce=0.042 {I6}; 
Total Ice=0.0116 {I17}, calculated from I|g(1223.92|g)/Ice(1266.6|g)=0.33 {I3}/0.620 {I52}, measured in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay, and I|g(1223.92|g)=0.0062 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
$K/Total ce=0.56, L/Total ce=0.11, M/Total ce=0.040; 
TI I(|g+ce)=0.028 {I7}, calculated from I(|g+ce)(1253.8|g)/I|g(1154.8|g)=1.77 {I43}, measured in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
Placement of this |g between the 1427- and 871-keV levels is based on the 3- level seen in (d,d') at 1429 keV and on observation of (555|g)(828|g) coincidences by 1979Re01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI calculated from I|g and |a. The authors of 1977Fr03 obtained ce intensities from the measured Ice(L2), and listed I(|g+ce)=2.1 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI 1977Fr03 listed I(|g+ce)=12.9 {I15} by adding expected L1, L2, M2 and higher shell electrons. Because the uncertainties on Ice's are larger than that for I|g, I(|g+ce) calculated from I|g and |a is given for 80.412-keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=0.21 {I3} is calculated from Ice(L3; measured)=1.09 {I15}, |a(L3)(E2 theory)=5.24 and Ice(M2; measured)=0.51 {I4}, |a(M2)(E2 theory)=2.400. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E |g was not observed in 8.6-h {+250}Es |e decay. Energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from I|g(119|g)/I|g(1028|g)=0.0015 {I5}/10.9 {I3}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E |g was not observed in 8.6-h {+250}Es |e decay. Energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from I|g(165|g)/I|g(1028|g)=0.0030 {I4}/10.9 {I3}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E |g was not observed in 8.6-h {+250}Es |e decay. Energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from I|g(199|g)/I|g(1028|g)=0.0024 {I3}/10.9 {I3}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
MR E2 admixture of |<20% listed in 1977Fr03 was determined from L1/L3=0.6 {I1}/<0.3. The L2 line was masked. |a(L1)(exp)=0.6 {I1}/0.05 {I2}=12 {I6} gives |d=0.9 {I+12-6}. 
TI transition intensity is listed as (1.0-1.9) by 1977Fr03. Since the intensity balance at the 1377.85 level requires I(|g+ce)(66.759|g)|>I(|g+ce)(79.998|g), the higher number is given here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
MR E2 admixture of |<7% listed in 1977Fr03 was determined from L1/L3=10.0 {I5}/0.5 {I5}. |a(L1)(exp)=10.0 {I5}/1.07 {I9} gives |d=0.21 {I+25-21}. 
|a(|d=0.14 {I14})=15.4 {I+16-7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E adopted from 8.6-h {+250}Es |e decay. E|g=42.7 {I2} was obtained by 1980Ah03 from the electron lines. 
RI calculated from Ice(M)=7.5 {I4} (1980Ah03) and |a(M)=266 only the ce(M) and ce(N) lines of this transition were observed. 
M adopted from 8.6-h {+250}Es |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
|g was not observed; its energy is from 8.6-h {+250}Es |e decay; I|g is calculated from intensity balance at the 141.88 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Its energy was measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI photon intensity is calculated from the ratio measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay: I|g(126|g)/I|g(989|g)=0.0140 {I12}/100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Its energy was measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI photon intensity is calculated from the ratio measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay: I|g(160|g)/I|g(989|g)=0.0633 {I44}/100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E |g was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from I|g(119|g)/I|g(1028|g)=0.0015 {I5}/10.9 {I3}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E |g was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from I|g(165|g)/I|g(1028|g)=0.0030 {I4}/10.9 {I3}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E |g was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from I|g(199|g)/I|g(1028|g)=0.0024 {I3}/10.9 {I3}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. This transition was not observed in {+250}Es |e decays. 
RI calculated from I|g(303|g)/I|g(1133|g)=0.51 {I5}/4.30 {I22}, measured in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
The expected ce intensities from E2 component are Ice(K)=0.00180, Ice(L)=0.00048. The measured Ice(K)=0.015 {I3} is then mostly due to the E0 component: Ice(K; E0)=0.013 {I3}. The unobserved higher-shell electron intensity, Ice(LMN), can be estimated as 0.0046 by assuming the same ratio observed for the 1154.3 keV E0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI transition was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay. Its energy was measured by 1979Re01 in {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. The intensity, I|g=0.0094 {I13}, is calculated from I|g(1296|g)/I|g(1154|g)=15 {I2}/159 {I8}, also measured by 1979Re01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E this |g was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay; its energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from adopted branching ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E 1516.22|g was not observed in 2.22-h {+250}Es |e decay; its energy is from {+250}Bk |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated from adopted branching ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E measured by 1963Le17. E|g=154.35 {I6} was measured in {+250}Es |e decay. 
RI measured by 1963Le17. Intensity balance at the 296.23-keV level gives I|g=0.00152 {I19}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from E(level), |g is masked by K|b{-1} x ray (E(K|b{-1} x ray)=130.85) 
RI$deduced by 1984Li05 from an excess of K|b{-1} x ray (K|b{-1} x ray/K|a{-1}| x ray=0.53 {I4} (measured)=0.343 (theory)) and K|a{-1}| x ray/I|g(178|g)=3.19 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(L1)+ce(L2)=1.52 {I13} (2005Ah09) 
MR$Calculated from measured conversion coefficients using BrIccMixing v2.3d. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1:M2:M3:M4:M5=24:11: 16: 14: 0.4 {I2}: 0.4 {I4}, N12:N3:O123= 8: 3.7: 3.5, L3:M1=24:11 (1971Ah01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 44.0 keV {I5} in Coulomb Excitation 
M$from |a(M)exp=240, |a(N+O+...)=70 with uncertainties better than 15% in {+252}Es |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from Cf({+18}O,X|g) (2010Ta10). 
M$Q from I|g(in-plane)/I|g(out-of-plane)=1.33 {I22} in Cf({+18}O,X|g); E2 from assignment to rotational band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from Cf({+18}O,X|g) (2010Ta10). 
M$Q from I|g(in-plane)/I|g(out-of-plane)=1.1 {I3} in Cf({+18}O,X|g); E2 from assignment to rotational band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from Cf({+18}O,X|g) (2010Ta10). 
M$Q from I|g(in-plane)/I|g(out-of-plane)=1.4 {I4} in Cf({+18}O,X|g); E2 from assignment to rotational band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$M1 with |d=0.0 {I23} from |a(L1+L2)exp=2.2 with uncertainty better than 15% in {+252}Es |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(L12)exp=31 {I3}, L12/L3=6.7 {I9}, L:M:N+=51 {I7}: 15.0 {I15}: 6.7 {I7} (1982Ah01). Theory |a(L12)=32.8 {I9}, L12/L3=7.2 {I10}, L:M:N+=51: 13.1 {I5}: 5.1 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$absolute measurement in % of |a decay. 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=4.6 {I5}, K:L12:M:NO=40 {I3}: 9.3 {I9}: 2.6 {I3}: 1.0 {I3} (1982Ah01). Theory: |a(K)=4.6 {I5}, K:L12:M:NO=40: 11.0: 2.81: 1.09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=1.31 {I13}, K:L12:L3:M=14.4 {I12}: 4.2 {I4}: 0.53 {I18}: 1.2 {I2}. Theory: |a(K)=1.31 {I17}, K:L12:L3:M=14.4: 4.4 {I3}: 0.49 {I5}: 1.27 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp|<0.13, |a(L)exp|<0.04 (2005He27). |a(K)exp is from ratio of K x-ray and I|g, while |a(L)exp is estimated from energy summing between |a's and L conversion electrons. 
M$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g transition has not been observed. E|g is from level energies. Transition considered to be highly converted (2006Ch52) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 405.6 {I1} keV (1978Ah02), 405.5 {I3} keV (2000Ah02), and 405.2 {I3} keV (2005He27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 453.1 {I1} keV (1978Ah02), 453.0 {I3} keV (2000Ah02), and 452.8 {I3} keV (2005He27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$From the reported I{-|g} and I{-ce}, the K-conversion coefficient is |a{-K}|?0.6. This is inconsisten with the reported value of |a{-K}|?0.06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$From the reported I{-|g} and I{-ce}, the K-conversion coefficient is |a{-K}|?1.5. This is inconsistent with the reported value of |a{-K}|?0.01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 405.5 {I3} keV (2000Ah02) and 405.2 {I3} keV (2005He27). 
RI$Weighted average of 72.7 {I72} (normalized to the intensity of the 453-keV transition in 2000Ah02) and 76 {I8} (2005He27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Tentatively assigned gamma (1982Ah01) 
E$|g observed in {+257}Fm |a decay (1982Ah01). |g exhibits growth during decay which suggests that it belongs in the decay of {+257}Fm daughter, {+253}Cf. {+253}Cf decays mainly by |b{+-} (%|b{+-}=99.69 {I4}); {+253}Cf |a decay does not show a |g of this energy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$[E1] implied by J|p assignments in 1993Mo18 
$See comment for 189.1|g about placement of this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$[M1+E2] implied by J|p assignments in 1993Mo18 
$Placement of this transition based on energy sum of 189.1+214.7 gammas, also supported by nearly balance intensities of the two transitions in a cascade, however the ordering of the two transitions is not established 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance considerations at 447.9 and 376.8 levels, mult=E1 is more consistent than either M1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2012He09. E(58|g) was also seen in 2011Lo06 (shown in Fig.4 in 2011Lo06) 
M$From 2012He09 who notes that for M1 transition, the expected I(|g+ce)(58.3|g)/I(|g+ce)(221.5|g)=1. The experimental ratio is 0.73 {I25} for M1, 4.1 {I15} for E2, 0.022 {I10} for E1; thus M1 (or M1 with small E2 admixture) for 58.3|g is most probable. 
$It is noted by the evaluator that if 58.3|g is pure M1, I|g should be 2.1, deduced from |g intensity balance at 58.2 level: I(|g+ce)(58.3|g)=I(|g+ce)(221.5|g)=109.2 units. If I|g=1.3 {I3} is correct, then 58.3|g may be M1+E2 with |d |? 0.35. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Expected by 2006Lo12 based on the 150|g in coincident with |?55- and |?70-keV electrons and the presence of a structure at 100 keV in the electron single spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 209.3 {I2} (2012He09) and 209.5 {I5} (2011Lo06) 
RI$From 2012He09 
M$From |a(LMN+)exp=2.8 {I22} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp=4.4 {I12} (2012He09), |a(K)exp=4.9 {I19} (2012He09) |a(LMN+)exp=3.42 {I87} (2011Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 150.4 {I2} (2012He09) and 151.2 {I4} (2011Lo06) 
RI$From 2012He09 
M$From |a(LMN+)exp=0.11 {I3} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp<0.98 (2004He28), |a(L)exp<0.3 (2004He28), |a(LMN+)exp=0.11 {I2} (2011Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 221.5 {I2} (2012He09) and 221.8 {I2} (2011Lo06) 
RI$From 2012He09 
M$From |a(LMN+)exp=0.04 {I1} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp<0.17 (2004He28), |a(L)exp<0.05 (2004He28), |a(LMN+)exp=0.023 {I4} (2011Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 279.5 {I2} (2012He09) and 279.8 {I2} (2011Lo06) 
RI$From 2012He09 
M$|a(LMN+)exp=0.08 {I2} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp<0.35 (2004He28), |a(L)exp<0.1 (2004He28), |a(K)exp=0.145 {I22} (2011Lo06), |a(LMN+)=0.076 {I12} (2011Lo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$From 2012He09 who notes that for M1 transition, the expected I(|g+ce)(58.3|g)/I(|g+ce)(221.5|g)=1. The experimental ratio is 0.73 {I25} for M1, 4.1 {I15} for E2, 0.022 {I10} for E1; thus M1 (or M1 with small E2 admixture) for 58.3|g is most probable. 
$It is noted by the evaluator that if 58.3|g is pure M1, I|g should be 2.1, deduced from |g intensity balance at 58.2 level: I(|g+ce)(58.3|g)=I(|g+ce)(221.5|g)=109.2 units. If I|g=1.3 {I3} is correct, then 58.3|g may be M1+E2 with |d |? 0.35. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(LMN+)exp==2.8 {I22} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp=4.4 {I12} (2012He09), |a(K)exp=4.9 {I19} (2012He09) |a(LMN+)exp=3.42 {I87} (2011Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(LMN+)exp=0.11 {I3} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp<0.98 (2004He28), |a(L)exp<0.3 (2004He28), |a(LMN+)exp=0.11 {I2} (2011Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(LMN+)exp=0.04 {I1} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp<0.17 (2004He28), |a(L)exp<0.05 (2004He28), |a(LMN+)exp=0.023 {I4} (2011Lo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(LMN+)exp=0.08 {I2} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3} (2006Lo12), |a(K)exp<0.35 (2004He28), |a(L)exp<0.1 (2004He28), |a(K)exp=0.145 {I22} (2011Lo06), |a(LMN+)=0.076 {I12} (2011Lo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ from ce data. A 101-keV peak seen in |g-ray spectrum is too intense to be accounted for this highly converted transition Other: 101 {I1}, estimated energy from Harris expansion 
$Ice(L1+L2)=100 {I21}, Ice(L3)=47 {I13}, Ice(M)=51 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M$Based on measured internal conversion coefficients in 2018Re07. Note that |a{-K} measured in this reference agrees with |a{-K}=8.3 {I29} in 2006He20 but disagrees with |a{-K}(exp)=16.7 {I27} reported by 2011As03. 
E$Weighted average of 199.9 keV {I3} (2006He20) and 200.09 keV {I11} (2011As03). 
MR$From 2018Re07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Based on internal conversion coefficients from 2018Re07. 
E$Weighted average of 192.1 keV {I3} (2006He20) and 191.91 keV {I16} (2011As03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Based on internal conversion coefficient from 2011As03. 
E$Weighted average of 194.5 keV {I5} (2006He20) and 195.3 keV {I2} (2011As03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Based on internal conversion coefficient from 2011As03. 
E$Weighted average of 163.3 keV {I4} (2006He20) and 163.3 keV {I2} (2011As03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 166.8 keV {I4} (2006He20) and 166.7 keV {I2} (2011As03). 
M$Based on internal conversion coefficient from 2006He20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 358.3 keV {I3} (2006He20) and 358.5 keV {I2} (2011As03). 
M$Based on spin-parities of initial and final states (2006He20) and non-observation of associated conversion electrons in 2018Re07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$ from estimated low conversion electron intensity 
$ From |g|g coin, 76.8|g and 150.5|g are parallel 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.6 gives E1 or E2. E1 is preferred from intensity arguments. E3 is excluded from lifetime arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$ 188.0|g is in coin cascade with both 76.8|g and 150.5|g. None of the three |g rays is in coin with 338.2|g or 398.2|g 
M$|a(K)exp<0.87 gives E1 or E2. E1 is preferred from intensity arguments. E3 is excluded from lifetime arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 45.000 {I15} (1973Ah04) and 44.988 {I10} (1971Po20, deduced from precise ce data for 693.7 and 648.7 gamma rays) 
M$|a(L)exp>200 (1962Un01) 
TI$deduced by evaluator from summed transition intensity of |g rays feeding the 45 level + I(|b) to 45 level 
RI$deduced by evaluator from I|g+ce(45|g) and total conversion coefficient for 45|g. Other: measured value of 0.049 {I5} in 1973Ah04 seems to have been underestimated, possibly due to detection efficiency issues for low-energy |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.20 {I2} (1975FrZZ) 
E$weighted average of 104.350 {I15} (1973Ah04) and 104.360 {I12} (1971Po20, deduced from precise ce data for 648.7 and 544.3 |g rays, and 688.5 and 584.2 |g rays) 
M$|a(exp)=20 {i5} (1962Un01); L1/L2=0.066 {i2} (1975FrZZ,1971Po20) 
$Ice(L):Ice(M+N+O)=3.0 {I4}:1.0 {I2} (1962Un01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.98 {I7} (1975FrZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00256 {i40} (1975FrZZ), 0.03 {i1} (1962Un01) 
$Ice(K)=0.027 {I8} (1962Un01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$648.12 {I40} (1963Ho07) from ce data 
RI$other: 31.6 {I22} (1975FrZZ) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0255 {i7}, K/L1=4.91 {i15}, L1/L2=0.97 {i3}, L1/L3=5.32 {i25} (1975FrZZ). Others: |a(K)exp=0.023 {i3} (1962Un01). Using ce intensities from 1962Un01 and I|g from 1973Ah04, evaluator obtains |a(K)exp=0.0269 {i20}, |a(L)exp=0.0128 {i14} and |a(M+...)exp=0.0045 {i15} 
MR$deduced by the evaluator from ce data in 1975FrZZ 
$Ice(K):Ice(L):Ice(M+N+O)=0.78 {I2}:0.37 {I3}:0.13 {I4} (1962Un01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$693.05 {I40} (1963Ho07) from ce data 
RI$other: 27.0 {I19} (1975FrZZ) 
M$from K/L1=4.90 {i15}, L1/L2=1.03 {i3}, L1/L3=6.06 {i25} (1975FrZZ). Other: |a(K)exp=0.021 {i3} (1962Un01) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L):Ice(M+N+O)=0.83 {I3}:0.38 {I4}:0.15 {I4} (1962Un01) for 694+689 doublet 
$Evaluator deduces Ice(K)=0.56 {I4} and Ice(L)=0.243 {I17} for 693.67|g using its I|g value from 1973Ah04, |a(K)(theory)=0.0225 {I4}, and |a(L)(theory)=0.00981 {I14} from BrIcc; the remaining Ice(K)=0.27 {I5} Ice(L)=0.14 {I4} is assigned to the 688.5|g from 734 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$deduced from precise ce data for 688.5 and 648.7 |g rays, and 584.2 and 544.3 |g rays (1971Po20) 
M,MR$E2(+M1) with |d>1.75 suggested by 1975FrZZ from measured L2/L3 and M2/M3 values, but the numerical values of these subshell ratios were not listed in the communication. Also in an e-mail communication of April 4, 2017, I. Ahmad (ANL), first author of 1973Ah04 and a collaborator of author of 1975FrZZ, suggested that |d(E2/M1) cannot be deduced since values for M1 multipolarity are very small. Evaluator assigns this transition mainly as E2 based on estimate by 1975FrZZ 
$Conversion electron intensity of the 39.8-keV transition is not available but expected to be weak as mentioned in 1975FrZZ priv. comm. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$583.26 {I40} (1963Ho07) from ce data 
RI$other: 3.2 {I2} (1975FrZZ) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0296 {i15}, K/L1=4.43 {i22}, L1/L2=0.86 {i5} (1975FrZZ). Others: |a(K)exp=0.042 {i5} (1962Un01), using ce intensity from 1962Un01 and I|g from 1973Ah04, evaluator also obtains |a(K)exp=0.042 {i5} 
$Ice(K)=0.123 {I13} (1962Un01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$688.20 {I40} (1963Ho07) from ce data 
RI$other: 13.6 {I10} (1975FrZZ) 
$Ice(K)=0.27 {I5}, Ice(L)=0.14 {I4} deduced by the evaluator, see comment for 693.67|g 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0240 {i7}, K/L1=5.17 {i15}, L1/L2=1.03 {i3} (1975FrZZ). Other: |a(K)exp=0.022 {i4}, |a(L)exp=0.011 {i3} and K/L=1.9 {i6} (deduced by evaluator from ce data given above) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$|g was seen in coincidence with 693.8|g (authors of 1989Ha10 listed it as being in coincidence with 696|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$from intensity balance at 160 level, value is in relative units on the same scale as gamma-ray intensities 
E$from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ In coin with 8360-8445 |a group. Placement of 42.0|g is either from 306.2 level or above the 209.1 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$From 2007Ch26. 2020Br08 suggests an energy of 478 {I2} keV, but there is very little evidence for this peak in their |g spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy. Other: E|g=|?125 listed in level-scheme Fig. 6 in 2022Te01 based on E|a values of 9.31 and 9.19 MeV cited from 2022Lo03. 
CC$29 {I+117-20} for E|g=102 {I30} 
$This transition is not listed in the Adopted dataset, as there seems no evidence yet that it has been observed directly. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$other results: estimated from extrapolation of spin vs. |w expansion in 2002He01 as 107.4 keV {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$identified as a doublet based on the width of the peak (2.3 keV), that is twice as large as the other lines in this energy range. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$ from 2007Lo11 
M$from |a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp)=1.3 {I2}, |a(L)exp/(|a(M+...)exp)=2.8 {I5} (2007Lo11) 
E$ form 2007Lo11 
CC$ from BrIcc code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp|a(M+...)exp|a(N+...)exp)=1.3 {I2}, |a(L)exp/(|a(M+...)exp|a(N+...)exp)=2.8 {I5} (2007Lo11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E,M$From text, not shown in Fig. 2. 2016He08 estimate a probability of coincidence with |a particles as |?0.22, considering the number of |a decays and 62.6|g as M1 transition with a conversion coefficient of 50.9. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$In Table 1. {I556}.6 {I5} and 556.8 {I5} are listed. Compiler list average value (also listed in the text). 
M$(E1) in 2016He08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$average of 111.4 {I2} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 111.4 {I3} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of 133.3 {I1} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 133.4 {I4} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of 156.9 {I2} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 156.9 {I3} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of 168.5 {I1} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 168.9 {I3} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of 179.5 {I1} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 179.4 {I3} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of 347.1 {I2} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 347.5 {I5} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 
RI$average of 57 {I22} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):GSI, and 100 {25} in {+254}No IT decay (184 |ms):LBNL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E|g=842 (2010Cl01,2006Ta19); 841 (2006He19) 
$I|g(778)/I|g(842)=0.03 {I2}, 0.16 {I50} (2010He10) 
$I|g(842)/I|g(214)=0.31 {I8} (2005Ee02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$E|g=152 (2010Cl01), 150 (2006He19) 
$I|g(152)/I|g(82)=1.10 {I40} (2006Ta19) for questionable |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=52 (2010Cl01) 
$Measured I(|g+ce) branching ratio=45.3 {I21} (2010He10, text on page 59), with the authors note that the 53-keV transition represents 47% {I2} of the decays of the isomer into the K=3 band. From these data, photon branching for 53|g=24.8 {I19}. Branching ratio data are not provided in 2010Cl01, however, the authors estimate reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=835 for 53-keV transition, and 183 for 778-keV transition, both assumed as E1, from which 2015Ko14 evaluation deduced relative photon branching ratio of 100 {I3} for 53|g and 23.7 {I24} for 778|g. 
M$observation of strong |g ray in spectra is consistent with its being E1, and not with M1 or E2 for which the respective theoretical conversion coefficients are 83 and 630. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Measured I(|g+ce) or I|g branching ratio=3.6 {I10} (2010He10). Other: |?4% in thesis by B. Sulignano (Mainz, 2007) 
$I|g(778)/I|g(841)=0.03 {I2}, 0.16 {I5} (2010He10, uncertainty of 0.50 in 2010He10 is probably a misprint) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$159.7 {I3} (2016WaZW in Table 9.1). It seems that E|g is too high by |?3 keV in 2016WaZW. 
TI$380 {I210} (2016WaZW in Table 9.1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E1]
decay_comment:
$The decay of the 184-|ms isomer through an intermediate 605-keV transition was also proposed by 2006Ta19 (experiment at ANL using Gammasphere array) 
E$604 {I3} (2016WaZW in Table 9.1) 
TI$from I(|g+ce)=103 {I19} if mult(605.7|g)=M1; 75 {I14} if mult(605.7|g)=E1 (2010He10). Other I(|g+ce)(604|g):I(|g+ce)(179|g):I(|g+ce)(159.3|g)=100 {I30}: 330 {I190}: 380 {I210} (2016WaZW in Table 9.1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (2004Hu11). Other: 101.2 {I6} (2016WaZW) 
$I|g=5.6 {I27}, I(ce(L))=120 {I30}, I(ce(M))=30 {I11} (2016WaZW) 
$Transition intensity/1000 recoils=440 {I35} (2004Hu11) 
$E(L1+L2)=73.2 {I9}, E(L3)=78.6 {I9}, E(M)=95 {I2} (2004Hu11) 
M$from comparison of measured I(M1+M2+M3+M4+M5)/I(L1+L2)=0.8 {I3}, I(L3)/I(L1+L2)=0.8 {I2} with theoretical values for E2, M1 and E1 (2002He24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$159.1 {I3} (1999Re02); 157.7 {I6}, 158.9 {I3}, 159.1 {I3} (2004Hu11), 159.1 {I2} (2016WaZW) 
$Transition intensity/1000 recoils=300 {I30} (2004Hu11) 
$E(L1+L2)=128.9 {I9}, E(L3)=136.4 {I9}, E(M)=152 {I2} (2004Hu11) 
$I|g=31 {I4}, I(ce(L))=82 {I23}, I(ce(M))=31 {I7} (2016WaZW) 
M$from comparison of measured I(M1+M2+M3+M4+M5)/I(L1+L2)=0.64 {I15}, I(L3)/I(L1+L2)=0.55 {I14} with theoretical values for E2, M1 and E1 (2002He24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$214.1 {I2} (1999Re02); 214.2 {I8}, 214.1 {I3}, 214.1 {I2} (2004Hu11), 214.5 {I2} (2016WaZW) 
M$from |a(exp) (2016WaZW) 
$Transition intensity/1000 recoils=240 {I20} (2004Hu11) 
$E(L1+L2)=185.9 {I12}, E(L3)=192.6 {I12}, E(M)=206 {I3} (2004Hu11) 
$I|g(214)/I|g(778)=0.93 {I37} (2010He10) 
$I|g=60 {I5}, I(ce(L))=35 {I6}, I(ce(M))=17 {I3} (2016WaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$267.3 {I3} (1999Re02); 266.5 {I10}, 267.2 {I3}, 267.3 {I3} (2004Hu11), 267.8 {I1} (2016WaZW) 
M$from |a(exp) (2016WaZW) 
$Transition intensity/1000 recoils=180 {I20} (2004Hu11) 
$E(L1+L2)=237.8 {I14}, E(L3)=245.6 {I14}, E(M)=258 {I4} (2004Hu11) 
TI$from 2004Hu11. I(|g+ce)=72 {I13} (1999Le42) 
$I|g=54 {I5}, I(ce(L))=14 {I4}, I(ce(M))=6 {I2} (2016WaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from comparison of K x-rays and LMN+ ICEs counts with those expected from theory, M1 and E2 character can be ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E E|g=225.3 keV observed in |a|g coin measurement may be transition from 7/2- to 9/2+. E|g|?250 keV used here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$from 2009He20, observed in coin with 9952-10067 |a group range (average |a energy=10008 {I26}) 
M$possible E1, estimated from number of observed |a|g coincidences 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from 2013Ru11, based on E|a values. Authors mention that the simulated |g-ray yield is marginal and consistent with an empty spectrum from the Ge detector. 
M$M1 or E2 suggested by 2013Ru11, but no arguments are provided. It is that the |g-ray would have been seen clearly if it were E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$number of counts=3 (2015Ga24) 
$Two more photons of 164.4 {I26} and 165.7 {I22} keV were observed by 2015Ga24, in coincidence with 9.58 MeV {I2} and 9.55 MeV {I5} particles. The photon energies are close to K{-|b2} x-rays of 167.12 keV, but from intensity arguments, the 166-keV photons could only be assigned as discrete |g ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$number of counts=7 (2015Ga24) 
$E|g=362 {I1}, mult=E2 in 2013Ru11 
$A pair of photons with energies of 126.6 {I12} and 227.0 {I25} keV seen in |g|g-coin (2015Ga24), which the authors interpret as the two summing to about 362 keV, and arising from the detection of two Compton scattered photons between two of the unshielded Ge detectors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$number of counts=1 (2015Ga24) 
$In coincidence with 9530|a. However, no |a peak was observed in the |a spectrum in coin with 434|g (2015Ga24), thus the placement of 434|g is tentative 
$E|g=434 {I1}, mult=E2 in 2013Ru11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$number of counts=1 (2015Ga24) 
$In coincidence with 9480|a. However, no |a peak was observed in the |a spectrum in coin with 479.6|g (2015Ga24), thus the placement of 479.6|g is tentative 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$2001Ho06 note that E|g is close to the theoretical energy of 299 keV from the yrast 8+ to 6+ levels in {+266}Hs 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$218|g in coincidence with 11.15 MeV |a 
$2001Ho06 note that E|g is close to the theoretical energy of 299 keV from the yrast 8+ to 6+ levels in {+266}Hs 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$|g counts=2 
E$from 2013Ru11 
M$from 2013Ru11, based on expected 0.13 K x-rays and 0.2 |a+e{+-} summing events above 9.9 MeV in the |a spectrum per 194|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$|g counts=6 
$In 2013Ru11, 237|g and 194|g were placed in parallel from 237 level, and the 194|g to a 43-keV level 
M$from 2015Ga24 and 2013Ru11, based on expected 0.11 K x-rays and 0.2 |a+e{+-} summing events above 9.9 MeV in the |a spectrum per 237.4|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$transition proposed from observed electron line E(ce)=0.36 MeV {I1} in coincidence with 9.57-MeV |a, the former interpreted as L2-conversion electron line of a |g ray, with L2-shell binding energy of |?40 keV for Cn 


