# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2,E3]
decay_comment:
RI This value is given in 1994Xu09 and 1996Xu03 as 1.5 {I10}, but this value is too large. For its minimum (1 |s) value of 0.5 and the minimum |a(M2)=30.7, its minimum I(|g+ce) is 16; this gives a feeding of the 256 level of 55 units plus the I(|e+|b{++}) feeding and a depopulation of only 49 units. If there is a significant E3 component with |a=68.8, this discrepancy becomes quite large. 1994Xu09 and 1996Xu03 show |? 5% of the |e+|b{++} decay to the 256-keV level, which suggests I|g=0.15, and this value is used here. 
CC For mult=M2, |a=31.5 and for mult=E3, |a=68.8. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI 0.32 {I9} (scaled value=0.10 {I3}) given by 1997Ap02 is the same as that for 1297.4 |g. It is probably a misprint since such a peak is not apparent in figure 1 of 1997Ap02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.01 {I10} 
$R{-DCO}=1.59 {I3} 
RI$the quoted intensity may have contribution from 442-keV transition from 6518 level (2016Pr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.54 2 
M$D interpreted by 2013Mo35 as (E1) from comparison with 279.2|g, 286.4|g, and 356.2|g known (M1(+E2)) transitions with DCO=0.65-0.69 (2013Mo35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E From 1982To14; other: 27.6 (1982Ba75). 
RI If transition intensity is 100, I|g is 33. 
M From |a{-L}(exp)=1.50 {I15} (1982Ba75). 
CC |a(exp)=1.8 {I1} and |a{-L}(exp)=1.50 {I15} (1984Al31 and 1982BaZE). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$D interpreted by 2013Mo35 as (E1) from comparison with 279.2|g, 286.4|g, and 356.2|g known (M1(+E2)) transitions with DCO=0.65-0.69 (2013Mo35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
RI calculated from Ice(L1+L2+L3)=133 {I40} (1980Bu25) and |a(L). 1980Bu25 report I|g=0.27. Requiring an exact intensity balance at the 142.0 level (that is, I(|g+ce)(31.7|g)=I(|g+ce)(88.2|g)=114, assuming no |e+|b{++} feeding of this level) yields I|g(31.7|g)=0.11 
M deduced from comparison of measured L-subshell ratios with theoretical values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$in their table of E|g values, 1980Bu25 give E|g=295.2, whereas, on their decay scheme, they show E|g=295.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from I(K|a{-1}| x ray)/I|g(110|g) in the delayed |g spectrum, 1979Fo11 measure |a(K)exp=1.87 {I20}, consistent with the value (adopted |a(K)=1.98 for E{-g}=110.12) for a pure M1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1 transition from R=0.75 {I9}. Commented by 2015Re03 is that this is might be E1, but this is not adopted the table or the drawing of the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI$Computed from |a and the listed I(|g+ce) value. 
M From L and M subshell ratios (1975Al26,1982Vy06) in {+156}Er |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI$Computed from |a and the listed I(|g+ce) value. 
M From L and M subshell ratios (1975Al26,1982Vy06). 
TI$Value is I{-e} for this transition (1999KaZV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of: 17.0~{I17} (1975Al26); and 20.0~{I20} (1999KaZV). 1982Vy06 list 17.0~{I17}. 
M,MR$From L and M subshell ratios (1975Al26,1982Vy06). 1999KaZV indicate mult=M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$1999KaZV place this |g from the 82.2 level. However, 2003KaZQ do not definitely assign this |g to the {+156}Er decay. 
M$From 1999KaZV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From identification (2003KaZQ) of a 6.98~{I5} keV conversion line as an M{-3} line from an E1 transition. 1999KaZV assign it as an M{-1} line from a 9.11-keV M1 transition. 
RI$Computed from Ice(M{-3})=18~{I6} (2003KaZQ) and |a(M3)=2.77 for an 8.72 E1 |g. 
M$From 2003KaZQ. 1999KaZV identify the 6.98~{I5} electron line as an M{-1} line and report mult=M1. 
TI$From I|g and |a. 2003KaZQ estimate I(|g+ce)|?60. 1999KaZV report I{-e}=27~{I9} for a 9.11|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(L{-1})=3.0~{I8} (2003KaZQ) and |a(L1)=14.6. 
M,MR$From |a(L1)exp|>11 and the relative intensity ratios of 1, |?0.40,|?0.65, respectively, for the L1, L2, L3 lines, 2003KaZQ conclude mult is M1+1.5%E2 for this transition. 1999KaZV report E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement is that of 1999KaZV, but 2003KaZQ question its association with the {+156}Er decay. 
M$From 1999KaZV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E This |g may be from the 203 level. 
M Multipolarity assignment of (M1+E2) by 1977BoYR is inconsistent with J|p assignments in {+157}Er |e decay which require E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI value is taken from 1975AlYW since it gives better intensity balance at this level; 1977AnYX gives |? 100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E 1977BoYR suggest this |g is doublet with second component having lifetime of 0.3 s. 
M Multipolarity assignment of (M1+E2) by 1975AlYW and 1977BoYR is inconsistent with J|p assignments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M Multipolarity assignment of (M1+E2) by 1977BoYR is inconsistent with J|p values which require E1. |a(M1+E2)=0.74 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Placement of this |g here is doubtful since the associated T{-1/2} is different from that of 121-keV |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E from 1996Go06. 
M from M-shell and N-shell ce ratios (1996Go06). 
TI from intensity balance at the 74 level assuming the 2nd forbidden |e transition to this level is negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=10.8~{I14} 
E from 2000KoZT; others: 71.904 {I4} (1996Go06) and 71.904 {I6} (1998KaZV). 
RI From 1230 {I16} (1977AnYX), 1600 {I100} (1982Vy06), and 1658 {I33} (1998KaZV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.162~{I17} 
E from 1998KaZV; other: 115.33 {I2} (1977AnYX) 115.36 {I5} (1982Vy06). 
RI From 20.9 {I19} (1977AnYX), 30 {I6} (1982Vy06), and 24.2 {I13} (1998KaZV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.22~{I4} 
M,MR Assigned E1 by 1972Ha41 and 1977AnYX and M1+E2 by 1982Vy06 with |d |? 0.65, but all consistent with |d given here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$%I|g=1.05~{I16} 
E from 1998KaZV; other: 341.58 {I6} (1977AnYX). 
M Assigned E1 by 1968Ab14 and 1971TrZQ and E2 by 1982Vy06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.014~{I5} 
TI From I{-ce}(L1) and |a(M1). 
RI From I{-|g+ce} and |a(M1); measured I{-|g} < 3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.040~{I9} 
E from 1998KaZV; other: 276.9 {I1} (1977AnYX). 
RI From 5.9 {I15} (1977AnYX) and 5.3 {I17} (1998KaZV); other: 12 {I4} (1982Vy06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
E$a transition of this energy may also depopulate the 464 level. 
RI$Calculated from I|g(1+|a) and |a. 
TI$From I|g(1+|a)/I|g(206)=0.142~{I9}, as observed in the isomeric decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a{-K}(exp) < 0.08, based on |a{-K}(exp)(166)/|a{-K}(exp)(205) < 0.02, compared to |a{-K}(E1)=0.069. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated from transition intensity and |a for pure M3. 
TI$Calculated to agree with transition intensity of 166 G. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated by 1979Ad08 from ce data; other: 31.0 {I20} (1979Ad08). 
MR$Authors' limit; their |a{-K}(exp) gives |d=+1.0 {I+7-4} and their K/L gives |d < 0.09, which are not consistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Placement by evaluator based on {+159}Ho isomer decay (8.3~s) (1971Ge01) 
TI$From I|g(1+|a)(40)/I|g(205)=0.142 {I10} as observed in {+159}Ho isomer decay (8.3~s). 
RI$Calculated from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g is not observed, but evaluator assumes this level decays to the 205 level. |g is thus an intraband transition. 
TI$Value calculated to give equal |e+|b{++} feeding of the 205 and 212 levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Placed by evaluator as a possible mode of depopulation. 
TI$Calculated by evaluator to give intensity balance at 464 level in the absence of any |e+|b{++} feeding. The value will be larger if there is any |e+|b{++} feeding. From intensity balance at 424 level, I|g(1+|a)(40) < 31. In contrast, from the ce data of 1979Ad08 for the sum of both 40 |g's, I|g(1+|a)=36 {I12} for E2 and/or M3 multipolarity. With I|g(1+|a)(40)=41 {I5} from the 205 level, that from the 464 level is I|g(1+|a)(40)=-5~{I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Includes contribution from radioactivity. 
M$Measurements give (D), but J{+|p}'s require E2 and |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E from {+160}Ho IT decay (5.02 h) 
M deduced by 1966Av03 from measured subshell ratios in 5.02-h {+160}Ho IT decay 
MR$%M4<0.03 (2010VaZZ, from |a(K)exp, {+160}Ho IT decay (5.02 h)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E from {+160}Er |e decay 
MR from 1990Go02 in {+160}Er |e decay. These authors conclude that, at the 99% confidence level, %M2<0.0006 in the 7.133 |g. 
CC calculated value for pure E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1,M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g ray postulated by 2010VaZZ ({+160}Er |e decay) as observed in a "fresh" spectrum of {+160}Er source with no evidence, reason for which its existence is questionable (|DE|g is adopted by evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 1966Av03 
M$from measured subshell ratios (1966Av03); %M4<0.03 (2010VaZZ) 
RI$calculated from I(|g+ce) and theoretical |a for E3 multipolarity. 
EKC$1.83 {I17} (stat) {I7} (syst) (2010VaZZ, from comparison of Ho K x rays and 59.98|g intensities in the |g spectrum of {+160}Ho IT decay (5.02 h)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 1966Av03 
RI$calculated from I(|g+ce)=76.2 {I20} using |a(E3)=930 {I16}. (If |d=0, one gets 0.082 {I10} with|a(E3)=923 {I14}) Note that this value of I(|g+ce) is smaller than that of the feeding |g, because of the |e+|b{++} branch from this level. 
M$from measured subshell ratios (1966Av03) 
MR$%M4<0.03 (2010VaZZ, from |a(K)exp) 
EKC$1.83 {I17} {I7} 
EKC$from 2010VaZZ, 
$from comparison of Ho K x rays and 59.98|g intensities in the |g spectrum of {+160}Ho IT decay (5.02 h) (uncertainties are stat and syst in this order) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$calculated from I(|g+ce)=100 using |a(E1)=17.3 {I3}. 
MR$from 1990Go02 (at the 99% confidence level) 
CC 1990Go02 report the following measured values of ratios of conversion coefficients for the 7.133 |g: |a(M1)exp/|a(M2)exp=0.81 {I8}; |a(M1)exp/|a(M3)exp=0.39 {I4}; |a(M4)exp/|a(M3)exp=0.06 {I6}; |a(M2)exp/|a(M5)exp=0.71 {I7}; |a(N1)exp/|a(N3)exp=0.48 {I12}; |a(N1)exp/|a(N4,5)exp=0.57 {I14}; |a(N6,7)/|a(N1)exp=0.20 {I5}; |a(N6,7)exp/|a(O2,3)exp=0.29 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1,M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g ray postulated by 2010VaZZ as observed in a "fresh" spectrum of {+160}Er source with no evidence, reason for which its existence is questionable (|DE|g is adopted by evaluator and I|g follows from the |e feeding of the parent level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference 
M from level scheme, |D|p=yes. From RUL, |d(M2/E1)<0.001 
TI from I(|g+ce)(11.1)/I|g(118|g)=0.57 {I3} in {+160}Ho IT decay (3.2 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in {+160}Ho IT decay (3.2 s). (A small amount of M2 is not excluded by this value.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference. |g shown on level scheme given by 1996Dr03, but not listed in their tables of data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 18 {I1} (1988Bh05) and 18.5 {I15} (2010VaZZ) 
EKC$|a(K)exp=2.0 {I6}, from measured I(K x ray) and I|g values, after removal of the contribution to the K x-ray peak from the 118 |g (assumed to be pure E1); |a(K)exp=1.8 {I3} (1988Bh05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M from level scheme, |D|p=yes. From RUL (applied to the (HI,xn|g) data), %M2 must be less than 0.0001 
CC value for a pure E1 transition 
TI from intensity balance at 107 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp<0.53, from measured I(K x ray) and I|g(118|g), assuming no contribution to K x-ray peak from the 107 |g. This conservative upper limit for |a(K) indicates that this |g is E1 (although a small M2 admixture is not ruled out). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from decay scheme 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I4} (1988Bh05) and 46 {I5} (2010VaZZ) 
ECC$3.8 {I4} (1988Bh05); 3.3 {I4} is deduced by evaluator from I{-|g+ce}=100%, calculated normalization and I{-|g}=41.1 {I39} 
M,MR$from M1 from 1988Bh05 and |d calculated by evaluator from |a=3.3 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI reported I|g are discrepant: 79 (1972Ka37) and 32 (1972Wo08) from {+161}Er |e decay. I|g=128 (1971Fu08) from {+159}Tb(|a,2n|g) reaction, but there the 87|g is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
The B(E2)(W.u.) value was calculated assuming that I|g(36.7|g)=0 and thus represents an upper limit. of the 36.7 |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI no I|g given since all 4 |g's from level are multiply placed 
M assigned E2 (1972Ha41,1979DzZZ), but |g multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI no I|g given since all 6 |g's from level are multiply placed 
M assigned M1,E2 (1972Ka37), but |g multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI doublet, but other component is not placed. 
M |g(|q) indicates D, but |g is doublet in in-beam study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E placements conflict; 1972Ka37 place a 1193 |g from 1404 and 1656 levels only and 1972Wo08 place it from 1491 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI reported I|g=32 divided by evaluator based on I{-|g}(153)/I{-|g}(252)=4.2/40 from 252 level in {+161}Er |e decay. 
M |g(|q) indicates D, but |g is doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E placements conflict; 1972Ka37 place a 1193 |g from 1404 and 1656 levels and 1972Wo08 place it from 1491 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M assigned E1 (1972Ka37); but then decay of this |g to 7/2+ level conflicts with placement of other |g's to 1/2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M quoted assuming that this |g is the same as the 573.3 |g in the (|a,2n|g) study, for which mult=Q is reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp/|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp = 100/18/2.4/|? 1.1/< 9 (1972Ha41) 
MR$from 1972Ha41 and supported by |g(|q) from in-beam study; but assigned E2 by 1972Ka37 from |a(K)exp=1.1 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp/|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp = 100/8/65/40 (1965Gr35) and |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=0.74 {I5} (1965St08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$not observed in this decay, but I|g deduced by evaluator from {+161}Ho Adopted Gammas data. 
M$Q assigned from |g(|q) from in-beam study. E2 from J|p values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ce data (1996Go06). 
RI$reported value is |? 10 (1972Ka37), but this leads to an overpopulation of the 211 level by 14% of the decays, so evaluator has assigned an I|g value of 5.6, which produces an intensity balance at the 211 level with no |e feeding of it. 
M$from |a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp=100/21 {I3}/26 {I4} (1996Go06) and |a(M1)exp/|a(M2)exp/|a(M3)exp=100/19 / 19 {I3} (1996Go06) and 100/21/17 (1972Ha41). 
MR$from ce ratios, 1996Go06 deduce |d < 0.078 if penetration included and |d=0.030 {I2} if penetration is excluded. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$values are discrepant: 42 {I4} (1972Ka37) and 93 {I20} (1972Wo08). 
M$from |a(K)exp/|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(M)exp = 100/20/2.1/5.7 (1972Ha41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$for 105.4+105.7 doublet |a(K)exp/|a(L2)exp=100/73 (1972Ha41) and |a(K)exp=0.69 (1972Ka37) and from 1979DzZZ assignment for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp/|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp/|a(M)exp = 100/12/39/37/21 (1972Ha41) and |a(K)exp=0.55 {I14} (1972Ka37). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$value deduced by evaluator from I|g(271)/I|g(370) ratio from in-beam study. Line is doublet with I|g=5 {I2}. 
M$D assignment from |g(|q) from in-beam study; E1 from J{+|p}'s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$|g placement by evaluator based on placement from in-beam study. 
M$from |a(K)exp/|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp/|a(M)exp = 100/19/|? 2.1/weak/4 (1972Ha41) and |a(K)exp=4.2 {I12} (1972Ka37). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.44 (1972Ka37) report mult=E2. However, from L1, L2 and L3 line intensities, 2008Eg01 conclude that the dominant mult is M1. The data, however, do not appear to provide a unique |d value for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$for 105.4+105.7 doublet, |a(K)exp/|a(L2)exp=100/73 (1972Ha41) and |a(K)exp=0.69 (1972Ka37) and from 1979DzZZ assignment for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from the average |a(K)exp(152+153) |< 0.16 (1972Ka37) one or both of these |g's is E1 and from 1979DzZZ assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.017 {I3} (1972Ka37) and 0.011 {I2} from combination of I|g of 1972Wo08 and I(e-) of 1965Gr35. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$If this placement is correct and the existence of the level is confirmed, then |p=-. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.032 {I15} (1972Ka37). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement conflicts; 1972Ka37 place a 1193 |g from 1404 and 1656 levels and 1972Wo08 place it from 1491 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp |< 0.0008 (1972Ka37), mult=E1. This assignment is not included here and in the Adopted Gammas, because then decay of this |g to 7/2+ conflicts with placement of other |g's to 1/2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI reported I|g=3.4 for doublet. Intensity divided by evaluator on basis of {+161}Er |e decay data. 
M |g(|q) indicates D, but |g is multiply placed (1971Fu08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) indicates Q (1970Re12,1971Fu08), but {+161}Er decay data indicate E1, which agrees with J|p's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI reported I|g=3.4 for doublet. Intensity divided by evaluator on basis of {+161}Er |e decay data for the other placement. 
M |g(|q) indicates D, but |g is multiply placed (1971Fu08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0079 {I8} (2013Bl07) 
$|a(K)exp: from 20m1 spectra. Others: 0.0077 {I7} (1m), 0.0081 {I7} (20m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$2016Ba65 list this |g only from 5/2- to 5/2+, but in the decay dataset in the ENSDF database, this |g ray is doubly placed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$2016Ba65 list this |g only from 3/2- to 3/2+, but in the decay dataset in the ENSDF database, this |g ray is doubly placed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$2016Ba65 list this |g from 5/2- to 3/2-, but in the decay dataset in the ENSDF database, J(1524 level)=(5/2,7/2)- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=1.41|*10{+4} {I5} exceeds RUL=100 
The computed B(E3)(W.u.) value is regarded as approximate only, since the |a value cannot be reliably calculated. See the comment in the {+162}Ho IT decay data set. The value listed there, 4.77|*10{+7} {I7}, was used in the B(E3)(W.u.) calculation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI value computed from partial |g half-lives given by 1978Sc10; based on private communication from authors of 1972WaYO. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of: 12.7 {I14}, from Ice(L1)=61.5 {I70} and |a(L1)=4.85 {I7}; 12.8 {I27}, from Ice(L2)=5.7 {I12} and |a(L2)=0.446 {I7}; and 12.5 {I21}, from Ice(L3)=0.91 {I15} and |a(L3)=0.0726 {I11} (with Ice(L1), Ice(L2) Ice(L3) measured by 1999IsZZ and |a(L1), |a(L2), |a(L3) calculated by code BrIcc) 
M,MR$from L-subshell ratios. The evaluator computes, at the 1|s level, the uncertainty in |d(E2/M1) to be <0.043. Note that 1999IsZZ quote %E2=0.21 {I12} for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of: 7.3 {I9}, from Ice(L1)=10.7 {I13} and |a(L1)=1.459 {I21}; 7.0 {I10}, from Ice(L2)=0.92 {I13} and |a(L2)=0.1310 {I19}; and 6.7 {I14}, from Ice(L3)=0.14 {I3} and |a(L3)=0.0209 {I3} (with Ice(L1), Ice(L2) Ice(L3) measured by 1999IsZZ and |a(L1), |a(L2), |a(L3) calculated by code BrIcc) 
M,MR from L-subshell ratios. The evaluator computes, at the 1|s level, the uncertainty in |d(E2/M1) to be <0.023. 1974Vi05 report |d<0.084. However, 1999IsZZ quote %E2=0.29 {I18} for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of: 0.124 {I25}, from Ice(L1)=0.15 {I3} and |a(L1)=1.210 {I17}; 0.135 {I27}, from Ice(L2)=0.10 {I2} and |a(L2)=0.741 {I11}; and 0.135 {I27}, from Ice(L3)=0.10 {I2} and |a(L3)=0.739 {I11} (with Ice(L1), Ice(L2) Ice(L3) measured by 1999IsZZ and |a(L1), |a(L2), |a(L3) calculated by code BrIcc) 
M from relative intensities of K, L2, L3 conversion lines 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$calculated with the formula I|g=[Ice(M2)+Ice(M3)+Ice(N2,3)]/[|a(M2)+|a(M3)+|a(N2)+|a(N3)], using Ice(M2)=10 {I2}, Ice(M3)=10 {I2}, Ice(N2,3)=4.5 {I7} (1999IsZZ) and |a(M2)=4.32|*10{+6} {I16}, |a(M3)=6.10|*10{+6} {I22}, |a(N2)=1.04|*10{+6} {I4}, |a(N3)1.44|*10{+6} {I6} (code BrIcc) |a(M2)=4320000 {I160000}, |a(M3)=6100000 {I220000}, |a(N2)=1040000 {I40000}, |a(N3)=1440000 {I60000} (code BrIcc) 
RI$also 1.84 {I20}, weighted average of: 2.3|*10{+-6} {I5}, from Ice(M2)=10 {I2} and |a(M2)=4.32|*10{+6} {I16}; 1.7|*10{+-6} {I3}, from Ice(M3)=10 {I2} and |a(M3)=6.10|*10{+6} {I22}; and 1.8|*10{+-6} {I3}, from Ice(N2,N3)=4.5 {I7} and |a(N2)=1.04|*10{+6} {I4}, |a(N3)1.44|*10{+6} {I6}. 
M$from Ice(M2)/Ice(M3)/Ice(N2,N3)=10 {I2}/10 {I2}/4.5 {I7} (1999IsZZ); 
CC$computed using RAINE (2002Ba85). Since E|g lies so close to the L1 and L2 subshell binding energies, |a cannot be reliably calculated by standard BrIcc code, reason for which RAINE computer code package was used. 
TI$I(|g+ce)=90 {I11} calculated from I|g and |a, which covers the expected I(|g+ce)=100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Values 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.17 {I6} (1958Go78), 0.2 (1966Bo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$|a=1.65 {I17} from intensity balance discrepant with |a(M1)=2.61 or |a(E2)=2.86, implying a missing intensity of 16 {I2} feeding the 100 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K-shell binding energy is within 1 keV of E|g=56.64 keV, thus theoretical KC is difficult to calculate, experimental EKC=12.0 7 is used for total conversion coefficient 
$|a(K)exp=12.0 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_comment:
M$unlikely multipolarity for this |g ray. Either J|p=9- for 377.2 level is incorrect or 95.7|g is misplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=170 {I17}:18 {I2}:7.0 {I10} (1999IsZZ). Others: (L1+L2):L3:M=100:5.3:25 (1966Jo07), 2<|a(L)exp<15 (1954Br96). 
MR$from %E2=0.20 {I+12-6} in 1999IsZZ from their measured L-subshell ratios. BrIccMixing gives |d=0.041 {I+7-6}, using L1/L2, L1/L3 and L2/L3 from 1999IsZZ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=28 {I3}:3.1 {I4}:1.2 {I2} (1999IsZZ). Others: (L1+L2):L3>5 and (L1+L2):M=2.9 (1966Jo07). 
TI$100-I(|g+ce)(94|g) 
MR$from %E2=0.27 {I12} in 1999IsZZ from their measured L-subshell ratios. BrIccMixing gives |d=0.065 {I10}, using L1/L2 and L1/L3 from 1999IsZZ, inclusion of L2/L3 gives |d=0.086 {I12}, but with reduced |h{+2}=3.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce), |a and I|g normalization 
$L1:L2:L3=<2:100 {I10}:110 {I11} (1999IsZZ). Others: (L1+L2):L3:M:N=100:108:49:15 (1966Jo07), L:M=2 (1954Br96). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 0.168 {I9} from subshell ratios in {+165}Dy |e decay (2.334 h) and +0.157 {I5} from E2 and M1 matrix elements in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 0.168 {I9} from {+165}Dy |b{+-} decay (2.334 h) and +0.157 {I5} from E2 and M1 matrix elements from 2003Iw01. Other: 0.17 {I4} from |a|g(|q) (1965As03) 
$A{-2}=+0.008 {I26} (1965As03), +0.007 {I7} (1958Ma36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1966Bo16. Others: 940 {I66} (1970WaZO), 730 {I73} (1967Se09), 900 (1985Si06) 
M$A{-2}=+0.016 {I21} (1985Si06), +0.012 {I24} (1965As03) 
MR$others: +0.18 {I3} (1985Si06), +0.17 {I3} (1965As03), +0.20 {I5} (1958Ma36) from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0096 from adopted branching, ce(K)-ratio (1963Di09) and |a(K)(E2)=0.015 for 472|g 
MR$Other: -0.09 {I5} from A{-2}=-0.167 {I17} (1985Si06) is in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$ce(K)(428|g):ce(K)(544|g):ce(K)(638|g)=11 {I5}:13 {I4}:|?8 (1963Di09) 
$Theoretical |a for assumed |D(E|g)=2 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=-0.062 {I22} (1985Si06) 
RI$0.266 in 1985Si06 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I24} deduced from |g-branching, ce-branching, and |a(K)(689|g) for E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1965Sc09. Others: 94.692 {I3} (1971Lu08), 94.705 {I3} (1964Re09), 94.697 {I5} (1963Ma08), 94.697 {I4} (1962Ni11), 94.702 {I10} (1962Ha46) 
MR$weighted average of 0.168 {I9} from subshell ratios (1991Mi26) and +0.157 {I5} from E2 and M1 matrix elements in Coulomb excitation (2003Iw01). 
$|a(K)exp=2.62 {I20}, K:L1:L2:L3=1000 {I150}:120 {I6}:22 {I4}:8.6 {I20} (1963Pe11). Others: |a(K)exp=2.5 {I2}, K:L1:L2:L3=1000 {I30}:128:19.7 {I6}:9.6 {I3} (1962No07); |a(K)exp=2.60, K:L1:L2:L3=1000:133 {I7}:17.8 {I18}:8.2 {I8} (1972Ma06); for L:M:N+O and L:M1:N1 see 1970Mi15, 1963Pe11, 1962Vo02. |d=0.168 {I9} (1991Mi26) from L1/L2/L3=100.0 {I5}/14.2 {I3}/8.0 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
E$from 1965Sc09. Others: 361.676 {I30} (1971Lu08), 361.699 {I25} (1964Re09) 
M,MR$from ce data in 2014Mi01 (earlier values from the same experimental group reported in 1991Mi26: K/L=5.2 {I3}; L/M=8.1 {I14}; L1:L2:L3=100.0 {I9}:12.2 {I7}:5.5 {I8}). Others: K/L=6.3 {I18} (1965Bo40). |a(K)exp=0.22 {I4}, K/L=4.8 {I12} (1963Pe11). The |d(E3/M2) value is deduced by evaluators by fitting ce data in 2014Mi01 using BrIccMixing code. 2014Mi01 give |d(E3/M2)=0.329 {I22} using a somewhat different procedure. Inclusion of ce data from 1965Bo40 and 1963Pe11 gives |d(E3/M2)=0.33 {I6}. Fitting with all the ce data, including those from 1991Mi26 gives |d(E3/M2)=0.28 {I6}, with a large and unacceptable reduced |h{+2}=12, with L/M, L1/L2 and L1/L3 data from 1991Mi26 poorly fitted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.126 {I36}; K/L=5.4 {I7} (1991Mi26). Others: >5.5 (1963Pe11), K/L=4.3 {I6} (1962Vo02). L1/L2/L3=100 {I6}/15 {I4}/<7 (1991Mi26) 
E$from 1965Sc09. Others: 279.759 {I20} (1971Lu08), 279.784 {I41} (1964Re09), 279.755 {I30} (1962Ni11) 
MR$|g(|q,t) (1982HaYO) gives -0.38 {I+3-1} or +5.3 {I4}. The ce data of 1991Mi26 gives 0.55 {I16} from K/L and L1/L2, which supports lower |d of 1982HaYO 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$other: 15.87 {I32} (1972Ma06) 
M,MR$|g(|q,t) (1982HaYO) gives +0.18 {I1} or +9.9 {I+11-9}. |a(K)exp=0.018 {I7} (1963Pe11); 0.014 {I3} (1991Mi26) support lower |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.87 {I5} (1972Ma06) 
M$M1+E2 for 1055.76|g inconsistent with adopted |DJ|p which requires E1+M2 
MR$from |g(|q), may also be |d|>+2.1 (1982HaYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. Transition unobserved, but expected. 
TI =1580 {I270} from intensity balance at 263 level in (n,|g) E=thermal. However, this leads to B(M2)(W.u.)(258|g)>69 and B(E2)(W.u.)(72.9|g)>300, both of which exceed RUL (assuming |a(72|g)=9.62, |a(258|g)=0.844). I(|g+ce)(3.1)=17.5|*10{+4} would Be needed to reduce B(M2)(W.u.)(258|g) to 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I(544|g):I(489|g)=87 {I4}:100 {I5} from 2007ChZX in (n,|g) E=thermal. I|g=1667 {I500} in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin is grossly discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I(409|g):I(427 from 598 level)=0.5 {I1}:0.83 {I20} in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin and I(427|g) here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 167 {I33} in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin suggest that |g is contaminated in that reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI branching may Be overestimated; independent (n,|g) E=thermal studies report I|g data that differ by an order of magnitude. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI from (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin. Placement is considered doubtful because it implies M2 multipolarity which seems unlikely. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement tentatively suggested by evaluator; E|g is not consistent with placement from 876 level, but (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin establishes that it deexcites a level in the vicinity of 873.6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
Reported only in (n,|g) E=thermal; not accompanied in that reaction by any of the transitions deexciting this level in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Reported in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin only; may deexcite a different level in the vicinity of the 882 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not observed in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin. Placement from 961 level established by |g|g coin; however, |g could have an additional placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(701|g) here and I(701|g):I(876|g)=100 {I15}:38 {I15} in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin. However, placement requires M2 multipolarity for this |g so it is shown as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI from I(840|g):I(948|g)=2.2 {I9}:1.1 {I3} in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g|g coin. Branch should have been seen in other studies, but was not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Evaluator tentatively places |g from this level rather than the 1114.7 level because it fits this placement better. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:M4=3.4 {I20}:89 {I5}:100 {I5}:19 {I2}:20 {I2}:1.1 {I2} (1964Br10). Others: 1960Ge04, 1960Ru05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3=100:9.3:1.6 (1960Ge04); 100 {I3}:9.5 (1960Ru05); 100 {I24}:7.6 {I24}:<4 (1964Br10). 
E from 1964Br10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from K:L1:L2:L3:M1=100:13.7:1.2:0.19:3.4 (1960Ge04); 100 {I8}:11.6 {I7}:0.99 {I11}:0.13 {I4} (1964Br10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from L12:L3:M:N=20:20:14:2 (1973PrZI); |a(L12)exp=7.8 {I31}, |a(L3)exp=7.8 {I31}, |a(M)exp=5.9 {I29}, |a(N)exp=0.8 {I5} (1973PrZI). |a(L3)exp=14 {I5}, L2:L3:M:N=125 {I38}:138 {I41}:54 {I16}:16 {I5} (1967Mo05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E 82.465 4 (1965Sc09); 82.35 7 (1963Or02). 
M from |a(L1)exp=1.0 {I5} (1973PrZI); |a(K)exp=2.8 {I14}, |a(L1)exp=0.5 {I3} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=82.49 {I5}, I|g=0.68 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
K:L1:M:N=100 {I15}:15 {I2}:4.7 {I14}:1.6 {I5} (1967Mo05); K:L1:L2:L3=100 {I15}:13 {I2}:1.7 {I5}:<0.9 (1967Mo05, thin source); K:L12:M:N=24:5:2:<1 (1973PrZI). |a(K)exp=1.5 {I4}, |a(L12)exp=0.29 {I15}, |a(M)exp=0.13 {I6}, |a(N)exp<0.06 (1973PrZI). 
E 116.833 10 (1963Or02) 
Other: E|g=116.84 {I4}, I|g=13.0 {I6} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; transition expected but not observed (see 1978Ba78). 
TI from I(|g+ce) imbalance at 180 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
K:L2:L3=100 {I30}:29 {I14}:29 {I14}; |a(K)exp=0.74 {I24} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=126.21 {I5}, I|g=0.89 {I6} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
K:L12:M:N=4:1:<1:<1 (1973PrZI); K:L12=9.8 {I12}:1.1 {I2} (1967Mo05); |a(K)exp=0.16 {I6}, |a(L12)exp=0.039 {I23} (1973PrZI). 
E 136.653 14 (1963Or02); 136.665 8 (1965Cs09 CRYST). 
Other: E|g=136.67 {I4}, I|g=23.3 {I11} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
L12:M:N=5:<1:<1 (1973PrZI); |a(L12)exp=1.9 {I10} (1973PrZI); |a(L1)exp=0.47 {I20} from 1967Mo05 and 0.80 {I15} quoted by 1967Mo05 from other work. 
E 69.736 40 (1963Or02 CRYST); 69.769 7 (1965Sc09 CRYST). 
Other: E|g=69.79 {I4}, I|g=1.76 {I10} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; transition expected but not observed (see 1978Ba78). 
TI from I(|g+ce) imbalance at 264 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(L2)exp=2.8 {I15}, |a(L3)exp=4.5 {I24} (1967Mo05) one obtains mult=E2(+M1), |d>1.6. The level scheme requires |DJ=2. E1+M2 would require |d>1.2 and thus is excluded by RUL. 
Other: E|g=72.89 {I7}, I|g=0.27 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
K:L12:M:N=5:1:<1:<1 (1973PrZI); K:L1=66 {I10}:9.5 {I24} (1967Mo05); |a(K)exp=1.2 {I5}, |a(L12)exp=0.2 {I1} (1973PrZI). |a(K)exp=0.68 {I19} and 0.66 {I12} (thin source) (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=149.32 {I4}, I|g=3.62 {I19} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 
E 149.306 10 (1965Sc09 CRYST); 148.805 14 (1963Or02 CRYST). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
K:L1:M=100 {I30}:21 {I10}:9 {I5} and |a(K)exp=3.0 {I10} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=87.47 {I4}, I|g=1.14 {I6} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(L12)exp=0.26 {I14} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=108.22 {I5}, I|g=0.64 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.8 {I8}, K:L12=178 {I71}:36 {I18} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=111.30 {I4}, I|g=0.47 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.8 {I3} (1973PrZI), 0.42 {I14} and 0.43 {I10} (thin source) (1967Mo05) for doublet dominated by this transition. 
RI 1.27 {I13} for doublet minus I|g=0.10 {I3} (|g|g coin, 2000Pr03) from 597 level. 
E 181.24 4 (1965Sc09) 
Other: E|g=180.96 {I5}; I|g=1.51 {I8} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); probably includes 180.5|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.10 {I4} (1967Mo05); 0.11 {I2} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=290.61 {I4}, I|g=1.55 {I8} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=197.58 {I5}, I|g=0.55 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); probably a 197.7|g+197.3|g+197.1|g unresolved multiplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 84.68 {I7}, I|g=0.229 {I26} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly for unresolved doublet. 
Placement from 348 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.17 {I7} (1967Mo05); 0.18 {I3} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=245.00 {I7}, I|g=0.76 {I8} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.08 {I4} (1967Mo05); 0.11 {I3} (1988Ba79). |a(L12)exp=0.019 {I6} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=333.61 {I4}, I|g=1.67 {I10} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.18 {I3} (1967Mo05, thin source); |a(K)exp=0.33 {I13} (1973PrZI); K:(L1+L2)=17 {I6}:3.0 {I15} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=239.13 {I4}, I|g=3.62 {I19} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 
E 239.08 5 (1965Sc09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.19 (1967Mo05). 
Placement from 638 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=167.40 {I4}, I|g=0.89 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
K/L12=9 {I6} and |a(K)exp=2.6 {I10} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=105.54 {I5}, I|g=0.377 {I26} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=192.62 {I8}, I|g=0.23 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); probably unresolved doublet (193.1|g+192.3|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI from 1989Du03. Other: 0.30 {I9} (1967Mo05). 
M from |a(L1)exp=4.6 {I27} (1967Mo05) using I|g value of 1989Du03. 
Other E|g: 38.492 {I8} (1989Du03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=410.45 {I4}, I|g=1.98 {I11} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); probably an unresolved doublet (410.3|g+411.1|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
|a(L12)exp<2 (1973PrZI); |a(L12)exp=0.6 {I4} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=98.86 {I5}, I|g=0.43 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp<0.4 (1973PrZI), 0.09 {I3} (1967Mo05); 0.11 {I2} (1988Ba79). |a(L12)exp=0.023 {I5} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=304.63 {I4}, I|g=2.16 {I11} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E 221.25 3 (1965Sc09). 
|a(K)exp=0.21 {I3}, K:L12=21.0 {I25}:3.6 {I7} (1967Mo05, thin source). 
Other: E|g=221.18 {I4}, I|g=3.30 {I18} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 0.064 {I13} ('Budapest data' for E|g=341.54 {I19}, 2007ChZX) but 0.28 {I6} (1967Mo05) suggests presence of contaminant in 1967Mo05 datum, so evaluator adopts the former datum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=524.35 {I6}, I|g=0.42 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 
Placement from 705 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.019 {I4} (1988Ba79). Other |a(K)exp: 0.020 {I13} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=489.45 {I4}, I|g=1.85 {I10} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.012 {I3} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=543.69 {I4}, I|g=1.61 {I8} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.3 {I8} (1973PrZI); |a(K)exp=0.26 {I11} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=199.66 {I5}, I|g=0.77 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.32 {I21}, 0.60 {I20} (1967Mo05), mult=M1,E2 for doublet. 
RI from |g|g coin (2000Pr03); I|g=0.25 {I4} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=76.69 {I6}, I|g=0.53 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly an unresolved doublet. 
Placement from 1023 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 693 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=263.14 {I20}, I|g=0.077 {I21} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.30 {I5} (1988Ba79). Other: 0.26 {I9} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=233.15 {I14}, I|g=0.61 {I6} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.08 {I2} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=391.86 {I4}; I|g=0.82 {I8} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from |g|g coin (2000Pr03). 
Other: E|g=508.83 {I7}, I|g=0.53 {I4} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly |g is complex in this study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=0.80 {I16} for doublet; I|g=0.03 from |g|g coin (2000Pr03) for other placement. 
Other: E|g=512.76 {I8}, I|g=0.52 {I4} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); presumably this also is for a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=132.35 {I18}, I|g=0.17 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); may not have resolved a close doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=542.74 {I4}, I|g=3.12 {I21} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=133.89 {I15}; I|g=0.19 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); may be a multiplet, but I|g suggests the presence of an impurity as well in this study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.32 {I21}, 0.60 {I20} (1967Mo05). 
Other data: E|g=179.28 {I7}, I|g=0.354 {I26} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=232.02 {I15}, I|g=0.37 {I8} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly for a 232.0|g+232.3|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 876 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=208.48 {I12}, I|g=0.129 {I18} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); probably for unresolved 208.3|g+208.9|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 736 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=306.55 {I9}, I|g=0.177 {I16} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement from 870 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Absent in 'Budapest data' in 2007ChZX so placement is shown here as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 736 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=471.53 {I15}, I|g=0.068 {I16} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.03 {I1} (1988Ba79). 
Other: E|g=487.45 {I5}, I|g=0.63 {I4} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=242.8 {I3}, I|g=0.060 {I28} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); may be a 242.9|g+241.8|g doublet, but I|g is consistent with that for the 241.8|g alone whereas E|g matches that for the stronger 242.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
Placement from 662 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=140.14 {I7}, I|g=0.43 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 905 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=423.52 {I16}; I|g=0.23 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 947 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=171.2 {I4}, I|g=0.042 {I15} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=161.14 {I10}, I|g=0.114 {I14} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); inconsistent data may indicate presence of an impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.030 {I19} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=455.53 {I4}, I|g=1.26 {I6} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 979 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=74.93 {I6}, I|g=0.50 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); discrepant data suggest presence of an impurity and/or a multiplet in that study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=131.27 {I4}, I|g=0.15 {I4} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); discrepancy suggests presence of an impurity in this study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 558 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=138.85 {I22}, I|g=0.11 {I4} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); discrepancy suggests presence of an impurity in this study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.40 {I25} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=214.46 {I8}, I|g=0.171 {I19} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 1062 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=406.53 {I14}; I|g=0.17 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 791 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=163.30 {I5}, I|g=0.359 {I24} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 815 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=216.79 {I25}, I|g=0.045 {I14} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). May include 216.1|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 1062 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=389.72 {I16}; I|g=0.12 {I3} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Absent in 'Budapest data' in 2007ChZX and far too strong to have been overlooked there if this were a {+166}Ho line; not included in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from |g|g coin (2000Pr03). 
Other: E|g=442.05 {I9}, I|g=0.35 {I5} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly a 442.0|g+442.2|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 951 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=225.81 {I22}, I|g=0.050 {I18} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 1011 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=317.18 {I12}, I|g=0.143 {I22} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 684 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
RI I|g=0.052 {I18} for E|g=335.89 {I19} line ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX) but I|g=0.62 {I13} (crystal data) and 0.32 {I8} (Ge(Li) data) in 1967Mo05. Unless there is a typographical error in I|g from 2007ChZX, it seems likely that the 336|g branching adopted here is much too high. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.24 {I17} (1967Mo05). 
Other: E|g=256.23 {I24}, I|g=0.148 {I18} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 597 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=267.14 {I13}, I|g=0.320 {I24} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from |g|g coin; I|g=0.60 for doublet (1967Mo05). 
The 'Budapest data' in 2007ChZX include two ~555 keV transitions from the 815 level: E|g=554.00 {I16}, I|g=0.31 {I5} and E|g=555.30 {I20}, I|g=0.21 {I5}, but the latter energy does not fit placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 825 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=169.70 {I7}, I|g=0.242 {I23} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=242.8 {I3}, I|g=0.060 {I28} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); may be a 242.9|g+241.8|g doublet, but I|g is closer to that from 1967Mo05 for the weaker 241.8|g alone. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 725 level rejected in 2000Pr03. 
Other: E|g=535.89 {I16}, I|g=0.137 {I23} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=4227.2 {I5}, I|g=0.058 {I26} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly a 4226|g+4229|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=4615.2 {I6}, I|g=0.092 {I21} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly a 4614|g+4616|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=4667.8 {I4}, I|g=0.053 {I14} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); data suggest presence of a contaminant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=4702.9 {I7}, I|g=0.060 {I16} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); data suggest presence of a contaminant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=4903.4 {I3}, I|g=0.150 {I18} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); data suggest line may be complex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other: E|g=5697.3 {I6}, I|g=0.061 {I24} ('Budapest data', 2007ChZX); possibly a 5695|g+5700|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement not adopted; E|g expected from Adopted Gammas is 301.4 and I(304|g)/I(220|g) here is much too large for the 304|g to have been unnoticed in independent studies in which the 220|g was observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I(544|g)/I(488|g) is much larger than the adopted value; possibly, |g is contaminated in this experiment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not included in Adopted Gammas; this E|g implies a level at 602.2 {I7} for which no other evidence exists. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Probably a doublet deexciting both the adopted 597.0 and 598.4 levels. From adopted branching for 597 level, I(427|g)/I(543|g)=0.069 {I27}, so I(427|g) from 597 level expected here is 0.07 {I3} leaving 0.83 {I20} to deexcite the 598 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I(614|g)/I(488|g) is much larger than the adopted value; possibly, |g is contaminated in this reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not included in Adopted Gammas; none of the previously-known transitions from the 683 level is present and no |g with this energy has been reported in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Probably deexcites the 719.7 level instead; see comment on 347.6|g. E|g would be consistent with placement from the 719.7 level if |g fed the 263.8 (rather than the 260.7) member of the 262.1-keV doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Based on Adopted Gammas, this |g should be accompanied by an order of magnitude stronger 455.6|g; probably the 456.0|g which 2000Pr10 place from a separate 717.0 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
May deexcite the adopted 788.6 or 792.8 level but other gammas known to deexcite those levels are not seen here and no |g with the appropriate energy for the former placement has been reported in (n,|g) E=thermal. Not included in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Presumably does not deexcite either 806.6 or 807.0 level because those placements would imply E3 or M4 multipolarity, respectively. Omitted from Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not included in Adopted Gammas because it is unclear which member of a probable 808 multiplet is deexcited by it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not included in Adopted Gammas; E|g fits placement poorly and |g is far too strong to have been overlooked in other studies that excited this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The evaluator considers this placement to be doubtful since it implies M2 multipolarity for the 485|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement not adopted. This E|g would imply the existence of a level for which no other evidence exists. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not included in Adopted Levels, Gammas. Presumably does not deexcite 882 level because it is too strong to have been overlooked in other studies; also E|g fits placement poorly. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
TI$27.9% {I9} based on adopted normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp, determined from comparison of K x-rays and |g-ray intensities in singles and coincidence spectra (1977Tu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp, determined from comparison of K x-rays and |g-ray intensities in singles and coincidence spectra (1977Tu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M to avoid negative I(|g+ce) balance at the 187 level, |a(exp)(44|g)>3.5 ruling out E1. E2 multipolarity would imply excessively strong |b{+-} feeding to 187 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$This |g-ray was not observed, its existence is deduced from the energy difference between the two proton peaks in the decay of {+145}Tm 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$ 11.7 {I5} for 451.8+451.4; 50% assigned for each component arbitrarily 
R=1.00 {I9} for 451.4+451.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$ 14.0 {I17} for 257.1+256.8, about 60% intensity for 257.1 
R=0.9 {I2} for 257.1+256.8 
$ E|g=257.5 {I3}, I|g=46 (1982No07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$ from |a(K)exp deduced from measured K| x ray(Er)/I(131|g) in K| x ray-|g coin (1982No07) 
$ E|g=131.1 {I3}, I|g=40 (1982No07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$174.1 {I15} for 810.1+809.4+808.0, about 85% intensity for 810.1 
R=1.43 {I2} for 810.1+809.4+808.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 111.3 {I1} (1987To02) from {+149}Tm |e decay, 111.0 {I1} (1985To11) and 111.3 {I3} (1989Fi01) from IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Fi01. Other: 630.5 {I3} from 1985To11 
RI$1989Fi01 give I|g=36 but note that I|g=7 {I3} belongs to a |g from {+149}Ho decay. Other: I(631|g)/I(111|g)=248 {I25}/100 (1985To11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I7} 
E$weighted average of 360.4 {I2} ({+150}Tm |e decay), 360.4 {I2} ((HI,xn|g): 2.55 |ms delayed) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from level scheme. I(|g+ce)(39.4|g) lower than I(|g+ce)(404.5+973.7) leads to |a(39.4|g) lower than 1.4. This agrees only with E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from conversion electron spectrum assuming E1; average of 6~{I3} (1996Ga24) and 10~{I3} (1987To05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$ 801.8 (1997Co24) 
RI$ observed intensity in 1988Ba02 is 24.5 10 but AP 95% is contributed by 151TM decay, only AP 1.3 is from 0.58-s 151Er isomer decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
TI$estimated from I(|g+ce)(288.7|g) 
RI$based on I(|g+ce)=95.3 (1988Ba02) and |a(E3) (only L and higher shells considered for |a; K-shell binding energy is 57.49~keV) 
E$seen only in ce spectrum in 1988Ba02. 
M$from a fit of observed ce(L) line with theoretical L subshell ratios (1988Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0025~{I10} for doublet 
M$|DJ=1, dipole from |g(|q) (1990An25) is inconsistent with E2 from ce data in 2000Fo15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0045~{I20} 
M$|DJ=2 is favored over |DJ=1, dipole from |g(|q) data (1990An25); but |a(K)exp gives E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.056~{I7}, |eK(exp)/|a(L)exp=6.5~{I10} 
M$|DJ=2, quadrupole from |g(|q) (1990An25) is inconsistent with M1 from ce data in 2000Fo15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0077 {I30} gives E3 or M1, but E3 is more likely if the 420-ns isomer decays through the 894.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=1.0 {I8} (1992Ku13) 
MR$|d=+2.0 or -3.5 (1992Ku13) 
CC$|a=0.516 for |d=2.0 and 0.491 for |d=3.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR -1.0 or +1.5 (1992Ku13) 
CC$For the possible |d values with a 20% uncertainty in |d assumed by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) indicates a dipole transition (1980Ba33); |g|g(|q) indicates |d=0 (1992Ku13) (mult.=E2 in table I of 1992Ku13 is possibly a misprint) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI from the I|g(63.5|g)/I|g(151.6|g) value of 1991To08 and I|g(152|g), one computes I|g(63.8|g)=2.7 {I12} 
MR computed by the evaluator from |a(M)exp=0.24 {I11} (1977Ag01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M the reported |a(K)exp value (0.15 {I5}, 1977Ag01) is smaller than that for either an E2 (|a(K)=0.360) or an M1 (|a(K)=0.731) transition, suggesting that it might be E1 (for which |a(K)=0.090). The placement in the level scheme, however, indicates that there should be no parity change between the two levels involved. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from a simultaneous linear-polarization and angular-distribution measurement (1987Be21). 2001Ni13 show mult=E1, but inferred from J|p considerations only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.98 {I1}. A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3}. POL=+0.32 {I5} 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.04 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.99 {I1}. A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I2}. POL=+0.27 {I5}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.03 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.98 {I2}. A{-2}=+0.33 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}. POL=+0.38 {I10}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.03 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.90 {I3}. A{-2}=+0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I2}. POL=+0.23 {I5}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.11 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.96 {I2}. A{-2}=+0.29 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I1}. POL=+0.37 {I6}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.02 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.96 {I4}. A{-2}=+0.25 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I8}. POL=+0.92 {I29}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.02 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.98 {I1}. A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I2}. POL=+0.39 {I6}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.08 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.95 {I8}. A{-2}=+0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.24 {I4}. POL=+0.42 {I7}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.10 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.98 {I3}. A{-2}=+0.40 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2}. POL=+0.62 {I13}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.03 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=0.98 {I3}. A{-2}=+0.46 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}. POL=+0.34 {I6}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.08 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.55 {I2}. A{-2}=-0.34 {I6}, A{-4}<0.01. POL=+0.55 {I19}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M2/E1)=-0.04 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=1.01 {I3}. A{-2}=+0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4}. POL=+0.31 {I12}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.04 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=1.05 {I3}. A{-2}=+0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I1}. POL=+0.42 {I7}. 
M 2001Ni13 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.04 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g), mult=Q. RUL eliminates M2. This transition is the basis for normalizing the |g and ce intensities to obtain |a(K)exp values for the other transitions in both the {+156}Tm |e Decay and the (HI,xn|g) studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From the heavy-ion study of 2011Re06. E|g=484.85 {I15} is reported in {+156}Tm |e Decay, but the evaluator has chosen the listed value for purposes of internal consistency. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$In (HI,xn|g), a 1368.0 |g is placed from a 14044.0 level, assumed to be the same as the 14033.2 level here. However, 2009Pa17 report a 1367.0 |g, which they place from a level at 13401.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Listed uncertainty is assumed by the evaluator. 
M$From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1973Be43), mult=Q. RUL eliminates M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From EKC=0.026 8 (1975Ag02), 0.024 10 (1980Zo02), 0.017 2 (1974Go14), and G(THETA) in (HI,XNG) (1973Be43). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI The ce lines of this transition and those of the 930.46 |g from the 930-keV, 2+ level form a doublet structure. However, since this is an E0 transition, all of the |g intensity is assigned to the 930.42|g. 
M |a(K)exp for 930+930.4 corresponds to M1 or M1,E2, and is interpreted as arising from an E0 transition and an E2 |g. 
M From EKC=0.0082 23 (1975Ag02) and 0.0068 34 (1980Zo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI The major part of this I|g is from this level (1975Ag02). 
M From EKC=0.0093 25 (1975Ag02) and 0.0075 16 (1980Zo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp for 930+930.4 corresponds to M1 or M1,E2, and is interpreted as arising from an E0 transition and an E2 |g. 
M From EKC=0.0082 23 (1975Ag02) and 0.0068 34 (1980Zo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
CC Computed from |a(K)exp and theoretical |a/|a(K) ratios. 
EKC Average of 0.042 {I11} (1975Ag02) and 0.032 {I8} (1980Zo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E |g is questionable, since it was not reported by 1975Ag02 and weaker lines were reported by them in this energy region. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI From 1980Zo02. 1975Ag02 report a single value (3.2 {I6}) for the combined 1516.3 and 1518.0 |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.026~{I8} (1975Ag02) and 0.024~{I10} (1980Zo02) ({+156}Tm |e decay) and 0.017~{I2} (1974Go14) ({+148}Sm({+12}C,4n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0084~{I14} (1974Go14). |g(|q) (1973Be43) indicates a stretched quadrupole. RUL eliminates M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp<0.0061 (1974Go14). |g(|q) establishes the spin sequence 9|)8 and |d|<0.29 for this transition (1973Be43). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR In the scheme of 1976Su05 this G is between 11+ and 9+ levels and from G(THETA) data it is assigned E2. This is OK here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR$|g(|q) establishes the spin sequence 11|)10 and the listed |d for this transition (1973Be43). From |a(K)exp=0.020~{I7} (1974Go14), mult=E1, with |d(M2/E1)|<0.15. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$R=0.27~{I3}. The small R value suggests that this transition is a mixed E2/M1 transition with a large negative mixing ratio (2011Re06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M From the limit on I{-|g} (1977Ag01) and the I{-|g+ce} value, which is a lower limit, the evaluator deduces |a > 60. Since |a(E1)=0.9, |a(M1)=9.6, and |a(E2)=267, one could assign mult=E2(+M1). In discussion of lifetime, 1983Be17 assume this is an M1 transition. A mixture with 75% M1 would satisfy both cases. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M This multipolarity and that for the 549-keV |g are not both consistent with the final state J|p values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$31/2(-) to 29/2+ stated in table I of 2006Ev02 is incorrect, it should be 23/2(-) to 21/2+ as in authors' figure 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$R(ang)=0.69 {I7}, A{-2}=-0.27 {I5}. Note that R(ang) and A{-2} values are the same as for 450.3|g. It is possible that these values are common for 450.3+450.8 doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$ quoted intensity of 2.3 is assumed to be the combined intensity for the doublet 
$R(ang)=1.65 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.44 {I2} for 924.5 doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$ placement shown from 75/2- to 73/2- in table II of 2006Ev02, but placed from 71/2- to 69/2- in authors' figure 3. Since it seems to fit in both places, this |g has been included with both levels 
$R(ang)=0.69 {I7}, A{-2}=-0.27 {I5}. Note that R(ang) and A{-2} values are the same as for 450.8|g. It is possible that these values are common for 450.3+450.8 doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$-0.18~{I+41-12} (1984Si05) in HI dataset seems too large to be realistic in view of expected short half-life of level and Recommended Upper Limits (RUL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=1.70~{I25} 
$|a(K)exp=0.0079~{I20} (1975Ag01) 
M Assignment from |a{-K}(exp) is E2(+M1), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.37~{I6} 
$|a(K)exp=0.020~{I4} (1975Ag01) 
M Assignment from |a{-K}(exp) is E2(+M1), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.85~{I13} 
$|a(K)exp=0.016~{I3} (1975Ag01) 
M Assignment from |a{-K}(exp) is E2(+M1), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.27~{I4} 
$|a(K)exp=0.031~{I5} (1975Ag01) 
M Assignment from |a{-K}(exp) is E2(+M1), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.20~{I3} 
$|a(K)exp<0.078 (1975Ag01) 
M Assignment from |a{-K}(exp) is E1,E2, but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI Measured value is < 0.10; intensity balance at 527 level requires < 0.03. 
$|a(K)exp>0.705 (1975Ag01) 
TI Equals I(ce)=0.080 {I9} if |g is pure E0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=1.55~{I22} 
$|a(K)exp=0.0029~{I8} (1975Ag01) 
M Assignment from |a{-K}(exp) is E2(+M1), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.015~{I16} 
TI From I{-ce}(K)=0.023 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=0.026 {I5} if transition is pure E0. 
$|a(K)exp>0.5 (1975Ag01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.26~{I5} 
$|a(K)exp<0.010 (1975Ag01) 
M Assigned E1,E2 from |a{-K}(exp), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.27~{I8} 
$|a(K)exp<0.007 (1975Ag01) 
M Assigned E1,E2 from |a{-K}(exp), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.142~{I21} 
$|a(K)exp<0.018 (1975Ag01) 
M |a{-K}(exp) indicates E1,E2, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.81~{I12} 
$|a(K)exp<0.003 (1975Ag01) 
M Assigned E1,E2 from |a{-K}(exp), but J|p's require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$29~{I1} (1984Si05) 
$0.01~{I10}, -0.11~{I8} (1984Si05), P(90|')=-0.04~{I22} (1984Si05) 
MR$-0.18~{I+41-12} (1984Si05) seems too large to be realistic in view of expected short half-life of level and Recommended Upper Limits (RUL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$1028 listed for this |g on the level scheme (Fig. 1) of 2013DiZZ differs from |DE(levels), which was adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|g ray inferred at (18+) by 2013DiZZ with previously assigned 647.9|g moved at (20+) (|DE|g postulated by evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$Value chosen to give I(|e+|b{++})=0.0 for 2nd-forbidden branch from {+159}Tm to the 9/2+ level at 182~keV. 
M$Reported as M1, but |g is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Division of I|g in {+159}Tm |e decay assumes possible 247 |g from 428 level has negligible intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
BM1W$Calculation assumes 247 |g has negligible intensity. 
RI$from (HI,xn|g); other: 37 {I5} from {+159}Tm |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$Value for the other 119 |g chosen to give I(|e+|b{++})=0.0 for 2nd-forbidden branch from {+159}Tm |e decay to the 9/2+ level at 182~keV. 
M$Reported as M1, but |g is doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Authors' uncertainty of 0.7~keV assumed to be typographical error. Other: 84.90 {I10} (1975St07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$For 119 doublet, total I|g=70 {I7}. Value for this |g transition is chosen to give I(|e+|b{++})=0.0 for the branch to the 9/2+ level at 182~keV since it is a 2nd forbidden transition. 
M$Reported as M1, but |g is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
RI$For 119 doublet, total I|g=70 {I7}. Value for the other 119 |g chosen to give I(|e+|b{++})=0.0 for the branch to the 9/2+ level at 182~keV since it is a 2nd forbidden transition. 
M$Reported as M1, but |g is doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Given as 762.1 {I15} (1975Ag03), but uncertainty assumed to be a typographical error since this is strongest |g in this region. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 74.5 s {+160}Tm |e decay; 
CC$estimated from |a(K)exp and theoretical K/Tot in 74.5 s {+160}Tm |e decay I|g from 9.4 min {+160}Tm |e decay 
$X(E0/E2)=0.97 {I21} from 9.4 min {+160}Tm |e decay (2014Bl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp in 74.5 s {+160}Ho |e decay (2014Bl12) is consistent with M1+E2, |d=-7 {I+3-17} measured in (HI,xn|g) (2006Du02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$estimated from |a(K)exp and theoretical K/Tot in 74.5 s {+160}Tm |e decay 
M$from 74.5 s {+160}Tm |e decay (2014Bl12) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.330 {I82} (2014Bl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp from table III in 2014Bl12, uncertainty=0.0021 in text on page 5 
$Contribution to electron intensity from 729, E2 |g in {+160}Dy subtracted 
M$|a(K)exp agrees with M1+E2 with |d|?1, however E0 admixture cannot be ruled out (2014Bl12) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.023 {I5}, assuming no M1 component for multipolarity of 729|g (2014Bl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$estimated from |a(K)exp and theoretical K/Tot|?0.87 
$X(E0/E2)=0.97 {I21} (2014Bl12) 
$Contribution to electron intensity from 879, M1+E2 |g in {+160}Dy subtracted 
E$incorrectly listed as 894 in level-scheme figure 7 of 2014Bl12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$based on |a(K)exp (2014Bl12) 
$|a(K)exp from table III in 2014Bl12, listed as 0.0034 {I8} in text on page 5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$estimated from |a(K)exp and theoretical K/Tot|?0.87 
M$based on |a(K)exp (2014Bl12, photon and electron spectra) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.97 {I21} (2014Bl12) 
$Contribution to electron intensity from 879, M1+E2 |g in {+160}Dy subtracted 
E$incorrectly listed as 894 in level-scheme figure 7 of 2014Bl12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp consistent with M1+E2, |d=-7 {I+3-17} as measured earlier in 2006Du02 (HI dataset). No E0 admixture is evident 
$X(E0/E2)=0 (2014Bl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$estimated from |a(K)exp and theoretical K/Tot|?0.87 
M$based on |a(K)exp (2014Bl12, photon and electron spectra) 
$|a(K)exp from table III in 2014Bl12, uncertainty=0.005 in text on page 5 
$X(E0/E2)=0.330 {I82} (2014Bl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.318 {I85}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I87} 
M mult=D(+Q) in |g(|q). Placement in level scheme indicates |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition not confirmed by 2011Ol02 
RI$I|g(270|g)/I|g(1142|g)=1.00 in {+148}Nd+{+16}O (1987Si07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.045 {I80}, A{-4}=+0.073 {I85} 
M$|g(|q) is isotropic. 1987Si07 assign mult=(M1+E2) based on |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition observed in {+148}Nd+{+16}O by 1987Si07 but not confirmed by 2011Ol02 (based on |DE{-levels} E|g should have been 333.0) 
RI from I|g(335|g)/I|g(439.4|g)=0.24 in {+148}Nd+{+16}O and I|g(439.0|g) from {+116}Cd+{+48}Ca (2011Ol02) 
$A{-2}=+0.033 {I28}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I30} 
M |g(|q) is isotropic. 1987Si07 assign mult=(M1+E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition observed in {+148}Nd+{+16}O by 1987Si07 but not confirmed by 2011Ol02 
RI from I|g(382|g)/I|g(439.4|g)=0.083 in {+148}Nd+{+16}O and I|g(439.0|g) from {+116}Cd+{+48}Ca 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition observed in {+148}Nd+{+16}O by 1987Si07 but not confirmed by 2011Ol02 
RI deduced from intensity imbalance in {+148}Nd+{+16}O and normalized to I|g(504.8) from {+116}Cd+{+48}Ca (2011Ol02) 
M from |g(|q), mult=D for the 551+552 doublet. 1987Si07 assign mult=(E1) to this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition observed in {+148}Nd+{+16}O by 1987Si07 but not confirmed by 2011Ol02 
RI from I|g(347|g)/I|g(517.4|g)=0.078 in {+148}Nd+{+16}O and I|g(517.4|g) from {+116}Cd+{+48}Ca (2011Ol02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI Discrepant values are I|g(190)=157 from (|a,3n|g) (1970Hj02), and I|g(190)|<29 from {+161}Er IT decay (7.5 |ms) (1970Bo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI discrepant value is I|g(207)=91 from (|a,3n|g) study (1970Hj02), but I|g(207)=50(13) in {+161}Er IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 100 {I10}/47 {I5}/57 {I6} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR <0.05 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 750/100 {I10}/21.2 {I26}/22.2 {I26} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=3 (1964Ab11), 0.4 {I2} (1975Ad08), and 3.2 (1980Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=3.6 {I7} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 679 {I121}/100 {I9}/25.0 {I24}/22.8 {I22} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=2 (1964Ab11), 5 {I3} (1975Ad08), and 6.4 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.42 {I7} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 981 {I125}/100 {I19}/300 {I31}/256 {I25} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08 and 1964Ab11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 100 {I10}/25 {I4}/18 {I4} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=0.7 {I4} (1975Ad08) and 0.7 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.7 {I3} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 732 {I113}/100 {I11}/14.1 {I13}/7.0 {I7} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=0.5 {I10} (1975Ad08) and 3.5 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.51 {I9} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 732 {I113}/100 {I11}/12.4 {I14}/4.2 {I6} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=1.5 {I15} (1975Ad08) and 4.8 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.117 {I19} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)=1167 {I167}/100 {I13} (1989Ab18). Other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 100 {I11}/33 {I4}/29 {I4} (1989Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=1.0 {I6} (1975Ad08) and 1.1 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=2.0 {I3} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 739 {I108}/100 {I11}/16.6 {I15}/12.5 {I15} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=5.2 (1980Ab18); other: M1 (1975Ad08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.19 {I4} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 929 {I171}/100 {I14}/186 {I29}/143 {I29} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(M1)(exp)/|a(M2)(exp)=100 {I35}/35 {I10} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=0.36 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.5 {I6} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 974 {I158}/100 {I21}/505 {I53}/474 {I53} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %M1=13.7 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.31 {I22} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 725 {I107}/100 {I11}/16.8 {I14}/8.2 {I7} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=3 {I2} (1975Ad08) and 5.4 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.30 {I12} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)= 738 {I221}/100 {I29}/|<14 (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2 |< 9.8 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.8 {I4} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 1067 {I200}/100 {I13}/1307 {I133}/1353 {I133} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 100 {I11}/25 {I3}/12.7 {I13} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=0.5 {I3} (1975Ad08) and 0.6 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.7 {I7} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 1040 {I160}/100 {I12}/1240 {I120}/1280 {I120} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.36 {I19} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 839 {I12}/100 {I13}/199 {I28}/166 {I23} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=59.8 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.69 {I7} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)= 754 {I98}/100 {I11}/20 {I3} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=11.7 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.93 {I17} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)= 747 {I107}/100 {I12}/15 {I3} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=5 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=1.2 {I5} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 712 {I153}/100 {I20}/34 {I7}/20 {I7} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=25 {I10} (1975Ad08) and 16.6 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.87 {I17} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 743 {I106}/100 {I14}/29 {I4}/16 {I4} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=17 {I10} (1975Ad08) and 15 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.38 {I9} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 450 {I100}/100 {I10}/25 {I5}/30 {I5} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.15 {I4} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)= 643 {I129}/100 {I14}/|?29 (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.80 {I12} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 740 {I96}/100 {I12}/14.2 {I15}/5.8 {I6} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=5.1 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.084 {I21} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)/|a(L3)(exp)= 867 {I200}/100 {I10}/113 {I3}/80 {I7} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)(exp)=0.13 {I3} and |a(K)(exp)/|a(L1)(exp)/|a(L2)(exp)= 707 {I133}/100 {I13}/27 {I4} (1980Ab18); other: 1975Ad08. 
MR from %E2=39 (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.) value calculated directly from B(E2)|^=5.01 {I3}. 
M from ce ratios K/L1=12.5 (1963Ab02) and 12.8 (1965Ab05), L1/L2=0.15 (1963Ab02,1965Ab05,1987BaZB), L1/L3=0.16 (1987BaZB), L2/L3=1.0 (1963Ab02) and 0.95 (1965Ab05), and L/M/N (1965Ab05), as well as |a(L)exp=1.48 {I21} (1974De47). Also from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (1976We24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M from ce ratios K:L1:L2:L3=40:5.1:6.7:5.3 (1965Ab05) and |a(K)exp=0.11 (1975St12). Also from |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) (1975Fe06) and (|a,2n|g) (1976We24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I3} (1974De47) for the combination of this |g and the 570 E1 from the 1572 level. See also 1975St12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0044 {I6} (1974De47) for combination of this |g and that from 1128 level; both are deduced to be E2. 1975St12 give |a(K)exp=0.007 and deduce that one transition is M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I3} (1974De47) for the combination of this |g and 899.9 from 1002 level; both are deduced to be E2. 1975St12 give |a(K)exp=0.0043 and deduce that one component is E2,M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), 1976We24 report |d=-0.04 {I+27-17} or -6.6 {I+44-}|@; evaluator assigns this as M1,E2 rather than E1,M2. |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I8} (1974De47) for combination of this |g and one from the 1572 level, which indicates that the stronger |g (from the 1572 level) is E1. Also, |a(K)exp=0.0056 (1975St12) for this combination. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I3} (1974De47) for the combination of this |g and the 900.7 from 900 level; both are deduced to be E2. 1975St12 give |a(K)exp=0.0043 and deduce that one component is E2,M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0044 {I6} (1974De47) for combination of this |g and that from the 900 level. Data are consistent with E1, E2, or M1 for components from the 1128 level. E1 is ruled out by the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.028 {I3} (1974De47), compared to |a(K)(E2)=0.0025 and |a(K)(M1)=0.0046. 
CC deduced by the evaluator from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I7}, 1974De47, in {+162}Tm |e decay, assign mult=E2. 2002Ca35 point out that this does not exclude mult=E1. E2 excluded by |D|p. Other: |a(K)exp|?0.002 (1975St12 ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (1976We24), |d=+0.48 {I+28-15} or +2.6 {I+15-7}; evaluator assigns M1+E2 rather than E1+M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (1976We24), |d=-3.5 {I+22-0} or |>+18; evaluator assigns M1+E2 rather than E1+M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I3} (1974De47) for the combination of this |g and that from the 900 level, this |g is deduced to be E1. Also |a(K)exp|<0.0095 (1975St12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I8} (1974De47) and 0.0056 (1975St12) for the combination of this |g and one from the 1002 level; the lower value indicates primarily E1 and the upper one mostly E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$other value, 930.1 {I4} ({+9}Be) (2012Sw01) 
RI$weighted average of 26.1 {I18} ({+9}Be) (2012Sw01) and 31 {I4} ((|a,2n|g), 1976We24) 
M$|g(|q) reported in ((|a,2n|g), 1976We24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$other value, 1359.6 {I2} ({+9}Be) (2012Sw01) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I9} ({+9}Be) (2012Sw01) and 100 {I7} ((|a,2n|g), 1976We24) 
M$|g(|q) reported in ((|a,2n|g), 1976We24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in (|a,3n|g) (1976Zo02) and from |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) (1975Fe06) and in (|a,2n|g) (1976We24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$X(E0/E2)=0.31 {I11}, q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)=4.4 {I15} (1974De47 and 2005Ki02 evaluation). 
$X(E0/E2)=0.24 {I6} (2013Bl07, weighted average of 0.23 {I9}, 0.25 {I10}, 0.24 {I9}), q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)=3.41 {I85} (deduced by the evaluator from X(E0/E2) value of 2013Bl07) 
TI$weighted average of 0.237 {I81} and 0.211 {I54}, deduced by the evaluator from the respective q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)=I{-K}(E0)/I{-K}(E2) and I(985.1|g) values from 1974De47 and 2013Bl07, and |a(K)(985.1|g) and K/Tot(|D|W(E0))(1087.16|g) (from BrIcc code) 2007Re16 previous evaluation uses |a{-T}(985.1|g) instead of |a(K)(985.1|g) and K/Tot(|D|W(E0))(1087.16|g), which gives the same result 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$weighted average of 0.028 {I3} (1974De47) and 0.025 {I3} (2013Bl07) 
RI$weighted average of 15.5 {I8} (2002Ca35) and 15.0 {I8} (2013Bl07) 
$q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)=11.3 {I16} and |r{+2}(E0)=0.068 {I14} (2022Ki03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI value normalized to I|g(1171|g)/I|g(1069|g) from 2002Ca35 and I|g(1069|g) from 1974De47. This value is considerably different from that reported by 1974De47, who place most of the intensity of this |g elsewhere in the level scheme (from the 1500.49, 2+ level). 2002Ca35 show that this latter placement is incorrect and indicate that essentially all the intensity of this |g is associated with the decay of the 1171 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
EKC$0.00135 {I25} (2013Bl07, for combined 1250|g and 1254.7|g) 
RI$weighted average of 67.8 {I25} (1974De47) and 67.9 {I33} (2013Bl07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E this is probably the same as the 418.6 {I4} |g, with I|g=0.40 {I16}, reported by 1974De47 but not placed by them. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI the I|g values reported by 2002Ca35 for the |g's deexciting this level were normalized to I|g(519|g) as reported by 1974De47. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 70 {I3} (2002Ca35), 78 {I3} (1974De47) and 78 {I4} (2013Bl07) 
EKC$0.00113 {I17} (2013Bl07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 12.3 {I10} (1974De47) and 12.6 {I10} (2013Bl07) 
EKC$weighted average of 0.008 {I5} (1974De47) and 0.0082 {I7} (2013Bl07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E this placement is shown by 1977Ja06 and is reasonable, but it is not clear if any experimental evidence supports it, and there is no I|g information. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+18}O,5n|g). E|g=106.05 {I4} in {+163}Tm |e for a weak |g 
M$|DJ=1 |g from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). M1 or E1+M2 from |a(K)exp in {+163}Tm |e. Comparison to RUL excludes E1+M2 
RI$from ({+18}O,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+18}O,5n|g). In {+163}Tm |e decay 190.0|g is assigned to deexcitation of the 439.5 level only, but part of the intensity (|?10% of the total intensity in |e decay) probably belongs to the decay of the 190 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.0701:0.0228:0.0286 
$L1:L2:L3=100:31.0 {I6}:38.5 {I8} (1987BaZB) 
M,MR$from adopted gammas. |d<0.05 from L-subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(M1):|a(M2):|a(M3)=0.46:0.44:0.72 
E$|g from 1980Ab18 only. Placement is doubtful due to intensity balance problems (evaluators) 
$M1:M2:M3=5 {I2}:5 {I2}:6 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.20 {I6}:1.33 {I21}:1.35 {I22} 
$|a(K)exp=2.47 {I9}. |a(L3)exp=0.82 {I16} (1991GaZZ) 
$L1:L2:L3=100:435 {I38}:435 {I38} (1987BaZB) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.294:0.028:0.006 
MR$other: 0.11 {I6} from L1/L2=8.8 {I11} (1987BaZB) 
$K:L1:L2:L3=4263 {I400}:575 {I60}:43 {I5}:8.2 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.623:0.060:0.013 
$|a(K)exp=4.8 {I2} 
$K:L1:L2:L3=251 {I30}:34 {I4}:3.4 {I4}:0.70 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from adopted gammas 
$|a(K)exp=4.4 {I14}. 
$Probable typographical error in 1980Ab18 on Ice(K), which is 10% of Ice(K) of 1982Vy07, which gives |a(K)exp={ 0.47 {I21}} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.518 {I4}:0.090 {I15}:0.053 {I16} 
$|a(K)exp=3.7 {I3} 
$K:L1:L2:L3=135 {I15}:21 {I2}:3.7 {I4}:2.3 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.041:0.12:0.11 
$|a(K)exp=0.50 {I6} 
$K:L1:L2:L3=5.2 {I8}:0.50 {I5}:1.7 {I2}:1.5 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.076 {I1}:0.010 {I1}:0.0044 {I11} 
$|a(K)exp=0.58 {I17}. K:L1:L2:L3=4.2 {I9}:0.56 {I12}:0.08 {I2}:0.04 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2)=0.022:0.0038 {I5} 
$|a(K)exp=0.092 {I21}. K:L1:L2=1.6 {I3}:0.22 {I3}:0.040 {I3}. ce(L2) derived from a complex line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1976Ab09 
CC$near threshold for |a(K). |a(K) estimated as 8 {I8} (evaluators) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.5 {I5}:6.0 {I6}:3.0 {I3}. ce(L1) from complex line 
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=1.1 {I2}:3.1 {I9}:3.4 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.0278 {I2}:0.00275 {I14}:0.00071 {I11} 
$|a(K)exp=0.188 {I7} for 239.6|g+241.3|g 
$K:L1:L2:L3=98 {I10}:13.2 {I15}:1.30 {I15}:0.33 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.015:0.0014 {I1}:0.00031 {I6} 
$|a(K)exp=0.110 {I4} for 297.9|g+299.7|g 
MR$from K:L1:L2:L3=58 {I6}:8.0 {I8}:0.70 {I7}:0.16 {I4}, assuming insignificant contribution from 297.9|g (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2)=0.0050:0.0039 
$|a(K)exp=0.042 {I6} (1980Ab18). K:L1:L2=1.5 {I2}:0.20 {I5}:0.15 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.053:0.0055 {I4}:0.0014 {I3} 
$|a(K)exp=0.393 {I15}. K:L1:L2:L3=58 {I6}:7.9 {I10}:0.8 {I1}:<0.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2):|a(L3)=0.019:0.0018 {I1}:0.00045 {I9} 
$|a(K)exp=0.124 {I5}. K:L1:L2:L3=43 {I5}:5.8 {I6}:0.50 {I4}:0.20 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1):|a(L2)=0.0094 {I5}:0.00159 {I17} 
$|a(K)exp=0.085 {I4} 
$K:L1:L2=4.9 {I6}:0.65 {I7}:0.11 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.100 {I19} (1980Ab18) gives M1(+E2) with |d|<0.55, but |DJ|p requires M2. No ce data available from 1982Vy07 
$|a(K)exp=0.100 {I19} (1980Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty from table in 1982Vy08. 1982Vy07 quote 0.12 
M$|a(K)exp=0.021 {I4} gives |d(E2/M1)=1.1 {I+8-4} but |DJ|p requires E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.12 (1976Ab09) gives E1 but |DJ|p requires M1,E2. 1980Ab18 note that the peak is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=0.85 {I11} 
$1982Vy07 place this |g from the 1593 level only. Least-squares analysis suggests double placement (evaluators). Equal intensity assigned, arbitrarily, in each place 
$|a(K)exp=0.0013 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1997Ha23 report { 18.0 {I95}}. The uncertainty may be a misprint, it should perhaps be { 18.0 {I9}} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$1997Ha23 report { 86.89 {I107}}. The uncertainty may be a misprint, it should perhaps be { 86.89 {I11}} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I2}. Sign of A{-4} is opposite to that expected for |DJ=2, stretched transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|?7 expected from a comparison of branching ratio in ({+18}O,5n|g) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I8} for a complex line 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I18} in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$This |g seen in both the activities of {+164}Tm |e. From relative branching ratios, this |g should have been seen in (|a,2ng) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ce data in |e decay (5.1 min) and (|a,2n|g); sign from |g(|q), where |d=-4.8 {I+15-59} or 0.00 {I+7-14} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$(M1) assumed in {+160}Gd({+9}Be,5n|g) (2012Sw02). 
$Assuming M1, reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=1.81|*10{+4} {I12}, |n=1 (2015Ko14 evaluation, using branching ratio=32.5 {I12}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=43.4 {I16}, |n=6 (2015Ko14 evaluation, using branching ratio=2.8 {I6}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=40.6 {I8}, |n=6 (2015Ko14 evaluation, using branching ratio=12.2 {I11}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+18}O,4n|g); linear pol in ({+9}Be,5n|g),E=59 MeV 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=432 {I56} from B(E2)|_=2.3 {I3} in Coul. ex. (1980Ya03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=282 {I132} from B(E2)|_=1.5 {I7} in Coul. ex. (1980Ya03) 
M$|DJ=(2),(Q) from |g(|q) in ({+9}Be,5n|g),E=59 MeV; population in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=357 {I170} from B(E2)|_=1.9 {I9} in Coul. ex. (1980Ya03) 
M$|DJ=(2),(Q) from |g(|q) in ({+9}Be,5n|g),E=59 MeV; population in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp) in ({+9}Be,5n|g) (2012Sw02) 
$Reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=2.78|*10{+3} {I12}, |n=2 (2015Ko14 evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$It is possible that part or all of this |g populated a known 8+ level at 1744 keV, which also decays through a 386-keV transition 
RI$7.2 {I15} (1987Ad06) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$1.8 relative to 100 for 315|g seems too low by a factor of 10. I|g(91)/I|g(315)=0.30 (1976We24) 
$A2=+0.12 23, A4=-0.01 29 (1976We24) 
$Other A{-2} and A{-4}: 1976We24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$147 {I5} (1976We24) 
$A2=+0.27 14, A4=+0.01 16 (1976We24) 
$Other |g(|q): 1976We24, 1976Da10, 1974Ba07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$A2=-0.09 16, A4=+0.008 20 (1976We24) 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4}. Other: +0.13 {I26} or -7.7 {I+51-|@} (from |g(|q), 1976We24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|D(EKC)=0.0001 (1984Fi07) SEEMS A MISPRINT 
MR$from |a(K)exp. Other: +0.02 {I+111-2} or +12 {I+|@-7} (1976We24) from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$negative A{-2} is consistent with |DJ=1, dipole or quadrupole. Mult=E2 in Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset based on ce data in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-1.5 {I+8-30} or +12 {I+|@-7} (1976We24) from |g(|q). |a(K)exp gives |d<2.8, supporting the lower value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives E1+M2 with |d=0.44 {I4}; also consistent with E2, but |DJ|p suggests E1. M2 component of 16% is less likely from RUL, assuming the level half-life is <20 ns or so. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A2=+0.24 9, A4=+0.14 13 (1976We24) 
M$|g(|q) data are consistent with |DJ=0, dipole, although, 1976We24 give |d=+5.0 {I+55-47}, and dominant E2 in {+164}Tm |e decay (5.1 min) 
$Other A{-2}, A{-4}: 1976We24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives E1+M2 with |d=0.49 {I3}; also consistent with E2+M1, |d=1.5 {I3} but |DJ|p suggests E1. M2 component of 19% is less likely from RUL, assuming the level half-life is <20 ns or so. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas 
$|a(K)exp=1.31 {I11} (1968Bo37), |a(K)exp=1.25 {I9} (1973KaZW). 
$Measured I(ceK)=87, I(ceL)=104, I(ceM)=45 (1966Jo07); these are intensities/1000 |b{+-} decays. Total ce intensity=251/1000 |b{+-} decays, including 0.33(IceM) for shells higher than M. Using |a=4.15, corresponding I|g=60, giving I(|g+ce)(91.4 transition)=311/1000 |b{+-} decays or 31.1% of total |b{+-} decays. Note that 1966Jo07 deduce 26% from the same data, which seems incorrect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ average of 91.39 3 (1971De22); 91.43 3 (1990Ad07). 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=1000:45:655:680:230:50 (1965Ab05); L1:L2:L3=12 {I3}:110 {I17}:110 {I17} (1990Ad07). 
$ CEK=134 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3=255 {I35}:27 {I5}:50 {I9}:46 {I9} (1990Ad07). 
$ CEK=2.55 35 
K:L2:L3:M:N=100:29:14:6:2 (1965Ab05); K:L:M=(100 10):(43 4):(10 1) (1971De22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
I|g<0.3, ce(K)=0.13 {I3}, ce(L)=0.020 {I5} 
EKC>0.022 (1971De22) 
X(B(E0)/B(E2)(1155|g))=0.26 {I7} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$ 1415.8 10 (I|g=0.4 3) in 1971De22 is assigned from this level. But E0 is assigned by 1990Ad07 from ce data for this transition 
RI$5.2 {I2} for 1416.6+1417.77, but no photons are expected for 1416.6 
ce(K)(1416.6)=0.021 {I4} 
X(B(E0)/B(E2)(1325|g))=0.14 {I5} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp 
I|g<0.1, ce(K)=0.018 {I4}, ce(L1)=0.003 {I1} 
X(B(E0)/B(E2)(388|g))>0.09 (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
I|g<0.3, ce(K)=0.04 {I1}, ce(L)=0.007 {I2} 
EKC>0.033 (1971De22) 
X(B(E0)/B(E2)(1674|g))=0.51 {I15} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2+E0 (1990Ad07) from |a(K)exp=0.048 {I18} is in disagreement with the Adopted placement. 
CEK=0.024 8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
CEK=0.014 3. (0.0141 3 listed in 1990Ad07 seems a misprint) 
EKC=0.0064 (1971De22) 
X(B(E0)/B(E2))=0.64 {I19} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2+E0 (1990Ad07) is based on |a(K)exp=0.07 {I2}. However, |a(K)exp agrees with M2 also. 
CEK=0.11 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
I|g<0.3, ce(K)=0.12 {I3}, ce(L)=0.020 {I5} 
EKC>0.023 (1971De22) 
X(B(E0)/B(E2)(2081|g))=4.5 {I15} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
E$ uncertainty of 0.03 (1990Ad07) seems a misprint 
CEK=0.016 5 
X(B(E0)/B(E2))=0.7 {I3} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
CEK=0.010 3 
EKC=0.0046 (1971De22) DISAGREES WITH 0.020 8 FROM 1990Ad07 
X(B(E0)/B(E2))=14 {I6} (1990Ad07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
$ If E1, reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=114-13000; effective f{-|n}=11-130 
$ If M1, reduced hindrance factor f{-|n}=36-1300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$<0.024 from ce data, but RUL=1 for B(M2)(W.u.) gives negligible M2 admixture, thus |d(M2/E1) is assigned as zero. Note that |d<0.024 gives B(M2)(W.u.)<450 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$E1 in 1982Vy03 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=46 {I4}:18.3 {I13}:26.9 {I16} (1980Ab18). 
MR$<0.024 from L1:L2:L3 (1980Ab18). Other: |d=-0.14 {I+5-6} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02). However RUL=1 for B(M2)(W.u.) does not permit any M2 admixture, thus pure E1 is assigned 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from |g-transition intensity balance. 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(total). Other: |?0.05 (1980Ab18) 
$Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=0.49 {I16}:2.5 {I5}:2.9 {I6} (1980Ab18) 
$M1:M2:M3=<37.5:60:100 (1970Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$(E2) in 1982Vy03 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=25.5 {I25}:2.9 {I3}:23.0 {I22}:17.8 {I17} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=18.2 {I19} Penetration parameter is deduced as |?0 (1991GaZZ) from |a(L3)exp 
MR$from subshell ratios. Others: -23.4 to +25.8 (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02); 6 +|@-3 (1991GaZZ) from |a(L3)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=100:33:67; M1:M2:M3=100:|?33:|?59 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=1.9 {I3}:0.95 {I12}:1.05 {I12} (1980Ab18); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp from Ice(K)=0.082 {I16} (1980Ab18) and I|g, with assumed 50% uncertainty for I|g is much larger than |a(K)(M1)=2.5 and |a(K)(E2)=1.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.66 {I8}:0.066 {I8}:0.164 {I16}:0.131 {I16} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=0.70 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2=833:100:<33 (1970Ab18); 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.37 {I6}:|?0.05:|<0.016 (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=0.44 {I5} 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.22 {I+13-10} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$M1:M2:M3=100:9.1:|?1.8 (1970Ab18) 
$|a(K)=0.197 {I4} from BrIcc was used for normalization of |a(K)exp for other transitions. Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=100:14.6:1.34:0.24 (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=100.0 {I19} 
$|d(E2/M1)=0.12 {I+5-7} from L- and M-subshell data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2:L3=666:100:11:<3.3 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=12.2 {I16}:1.64 {I16}:0.181 {I16}:0.066 {I16} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=13.3 {I6} 
MR$from ce and |d=-0.30 {I10} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02); sign from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.29 {I3}:0.06 {I1}:0.082 {I8} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=0.54 {I5} for doublet 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.42 {I2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$E2 in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2=677:100:|?10:|<3.1 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=6.8 {I12}:1.00 {I12}:0.10 {I2} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=3.7 {I9} 
MR$from K, L1 and L2 intensities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=189 {I13}:23.6 {I15}:7.6 {I5} (1980Ab18) 
$|d=-0.16 {I4} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 
MR$from L1, L2, M1, M2 and M3 electron intensity ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=10.0 {I16}:1.4 {I2}:1.30 {I12}:0.93 {I12} (1980Ab18). 
$Ice(K)=13.1 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$M1:M2:M3=100:|?333:|?256 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.90 {I8}:2.7 {I3}:3.0 {I3} (1980Ab18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$L1:L2:L3=100:11:<2.1; M1:M2=100:11 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=14.4 {I16}:1.44 {I16}:0.36 {I8} (1980Ab18). 
MR$from ce ratios (1980Ab18). Other: -0.20 {I2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2:L3=778:100:11:|<1.9 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=37 {I4}:5.1 {I5}:0.52 {I5}:0.115 {I16} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=45 {I4} 
MR$from ce ratios (1980Ab18). Other: +0.26 {I2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.53 {I12}:0.074 {I8}:0.056 {I8}:0.041 {I8} (1980Ab18) 
$Ice(K)=0.50 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$E2 in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2:L3=833:100:20:|?10 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=2.1 {I5}:0.28 {I3}:0.056 {I7}:|?0.028 (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=1.68 {I10} 
MR$from L1, L2 and L3 intensity ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI$from |g-transition intensity balance at 384.3 level 
M$small E2 admixture is also possible (1980Ab18) 
$Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=0.66 {I25}:0.41 {I16}:0.33 {I16} (1980Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.030 keV for least-squares fitting. 
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.41 {I8}:0.11 {I3}:0.070 {I16} (1980Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.02 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.74 {I16}:0.066 {I16}:0.49 {I8}:0.49 {I8} (1980Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2=600:100:|<17 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=2.3 {I3}:0.39 {I4}:0.049 {I8}:0.020 {I2} (1980Ab18) 
MR$from ce ratios (1980Ab18). Other: +0.44 {I+16-15} (|g|g(|q),1988Ul02) 
$Ice(K)=2.6 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$E2 in 1982Vy03. |d(E2/M1) from |a(K)exp in 1980Ab18. |a(K)exp in 1982Vy03 gives M1+E2, |d=2.0 {I5} 
$Ice(K)=0.176 {I22}. Ice(K)=0.25 {I4} (1980Ab18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.08 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.11 {I2}:0.014 {I3}:0.028 {I3}:|<0.014 (1980Ab18) 
MR$from |a(K)exp (1980Ab18,1982Vy03) and K/L1 ratios in 1980Ab18 and 1970Ab18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3=1333:100:|<25:|?33 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.72 {I2}:0.082 {I8}:0.0164 {I16}:0.0164 {I16} (1980Ab18). Other: E1(+M2) with -0.25<|d<+0.01 (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 
$Ice(K)=0.95 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$(M1) in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2:L3=|?714:100:10:|?2.3; M1:M2=100:|<12 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=2.7 {I3}:0.27 {I3}:0.066 {I16} (1980Ab18) 
$Ice(K)=13.8 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.056 keV for least-squares fitting. 
M$(M1) in 1982Vy03, M1+E2 in 1980Ab18; |DJ|p requires M1 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=1.8 {I3}:0.24 {I3}:0.033 {I8}:0.033 {I8} (1980Ab18) 
$Ice(K)=2.2 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K) value. Others: 0.086 (1983Mo10); -0.23 {I+7-8} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 
M$M1 in 1982Vy03 
$K:L1:L2=800:100:|?10 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=3.3 {I7}:0.41 {I4}:|?0.04 (1980Ab18) 
$(346.9|g)(242.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.057 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.034 {I38} (1975Fu13) 
$Ice(K)=4.30 {I21} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.024 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$K:L1:L2:L3=700:100:|?10:<2.5 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.76 {I8}:0.107 {I12} (1980Ab18). Other: M1(+E2) with |d=-0.20 {I17} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 
$Ice(K)=0.76 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3=700:100:|<20:<10 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.41 {I8}:0.066 {I8}:|<0.016 (1980Ab18) 
$Ice(K)=0.403 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.036 keV for least-squares fitting. 
M$(E1) listed by 1980Ab18 is inconsistent with 1/2+ to 1/2+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2=717:100:<17 (1970Ab18) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.33 {I3}:0.041 {I4}:|?0.004:|?0.003 (1980Ab18). Other: |d(M2/E1)=-0.13 {I+3-2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 
$Ice(K)=0.341 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3=500:100:8.3:<4 (1970Ab18) 
MR$M1(+E2) with |d=+0.06 {I6} from |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02) 
$Ice(K)=1.62 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.020 keV for least-squares fitting. 
M$E2 in 1982Vy03, M1+E2 in 1980Ab18 for a complex line 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.21 {I4}:0.029 {I3}:0.0033 {I8}:0.0021 {I4} (1980Ab18) (for 330.777|g+330.885|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.040 keV for least-squares fitting. 
M$see comment for 330.777|g 
$Ice(K)=0.172 {I9} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.30 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K)=0.025 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3=685:100:7.7:<2.3 (1970Ab18) 
$M1+E2 in |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02) with |d=-0.18 {I4} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02) 
$Ice(K)=0.97 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp is close to |a(K)(theory)=0.0052 for E2 and disagrees with mult=E1 from level scheme 
$Ice(K)=0.0299 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.26 keV for least-squares fitting. 
E$|g to 589.905 and/or 589.781 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.12 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K)=0.0008 {I3} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.24 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K)=0.204 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.24 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K)=0.0159 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.28 keV for least-squares fitting. 
$Ice(K)=0.0141 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp close to |a(K)(E2)=0.00312 disagrees with mult=E1 from level scheme 
$Ice(K)=0.00286 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$314.8+311.8 form a doublet with 25% component having T{-1/2}>70 ns, and 75% component <10 ns. The 311.8|g belongs to {+164}Er 
$A{-2} for 314.8|g+311.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$doublet: 60% component with T{-1/2}<10 ns, 40% component with T{-1/2}|?120 ns. Only one component is assigned here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$155.6+153.3 form a doublet with 12% component having T{-1/2}>100 ns, and 88% component <10 ns. The 153.3|g is unassigned 
$A{-2} for 153.3|g+155.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E from {+166}Ho |b{+-} decay (26.824 h). 
M based on ce data from {+166}Ho |b{+-} decay (26.824 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from |e decay (1987Kr12). Other |d: -22 {I+13-7}, -7 {I+23-3} in |e decay; >50 from (n,n'|g); -19 {I+9-38}, -38 {I+24-}|@, >25 in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 86.3 {I15} from |b{+-} decay (26.824 h), 81 {I4} from (n,n'|g) and 90.5 {I10} from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from {+166}Tm |e decay; -45 {I+19-137} from (n,n'|g), -8 {I+3-15} from Ho |b{+-} decay (1200 y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E from |b{+-} decay (1200 y) 
MR from |b{+-} decay (1200 y). Other |d include: -45 {I+8-13} from |b{+-} decay (1200 y), <-7 from (|a,2n|g), -75 {I+26-134} from (n,n'|g); however, data from |e decay range from +8.4 {I7} to -6.2 {I+10-8} and source of discrepancy is not known. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from {+166}Tm |e decay. Other |d: |>50 from (n,n'|g), -3.3 {I+12-30} from Coulomb excitation, 3.8 {I+34-12} and -10 {I+4-27} from |b{+-} decay (1200 y). However, discrepant data exist, e.g., +5.5 {I+28-14} in |e decay or -16 +427 and +566 -522-616 in |b{+-} decay (1200 y). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 55.0 {I10} from |e decay, 57 from Coulomb excitation, 43.9 {I24} from (n,n'|g), 70 {I7} from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
I|g(215.9|g)/I|g(810.3|g)=0.0502 {I22} ({+166}Tm |e decay), 0.109 {I11} in (|a,2n|g), 0.0432 in Coulomb excitation, <0.029 in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
I|g(529.8|g)/I|g(810.3|g)=0.164 {I7} ({+166}Tm |e decay). 0.167 {I23} in (|a,2n|g), 0.156 in Coulomb excitation, 0.300 {I23} in (n,n'|g). 
MR other values: see |b{+-} decay (1200 y) and (n,n'|g) data sets. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 51 {I9} in (n,n'|g). 
M,MR E1 from |e decay; D(+Q), |d=-0.02 {I6} or -5.4 {I+13-30} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR -0.01<|d(D,Q)<0 from {+166}Tm |e decay; mult=D+Q and |d(D,Q)=+0.01 {I+7-5} or +2.2 {I+3-4} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 52 {I6} in (n,n'|g). 
M from |e decay; |d(D,Q)=-0.08 {I+9-6} or +1.55 {I+21-23} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 5.8 {I7} from {+166}Ho |b{+-} decay (26.824 h), 18 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2)=0.018 {I2} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in (|a,2n|g) and |g(|q,H,t) in |b{+-} decay (1200 y). 
MR from |g(|q,H,t) {+166}Ho |b{+-} decay (1200 y). Other |d: |<-1 or |>+4, >+1.4 or <-6 in |b{+-} decay (1200 y); +1.6 {I+10-6} or -0.75 {I20} in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 22 {I4} in (n,n'|g). 
M D(+Q) from (n,n'|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 
|d(D,Q)=-0.03 {I+10-6} or +1.02 {I+14-18} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 37.7 {I9} from |b{+-} decay (1200 y) and 36.5 {I11} from |e decay. Other I|g: 48 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR from {+166}Ho |b{+-} decay (26.824 h). Other |d: -0.04 {I+8-9} or -3.0 {I+7-11} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in {+164}Dy(|a,2n|g). 
|d(D,Q)=-11 {I+3}- infinity from |g(|q) in {+164}Dy(|a,2n|g) for |g that may Be doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E E|g=1495.57 {I18} for unplaced |g in {+166}Tm |e decay. 
M from (n,n'|g). 
MR +0.41 {I+7-4} or +4.2 {I8} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 32 {I11} from |e decay, 48 {I5} and 67 {I6} from (|g,|g'), and 33 {I8} from (n,n'|g) (weighted average is 50 {I7}). 
M D+Q from (n,n'|g), |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 
MR -1.6<|d(D,Q)<-0.28 from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M D+Q from (n,n'|g); M1 from |e decay. 
MR weighted average of -0.11 {I+5-8} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g), -0.17 {I5} and -0.21 {I9} from |g|g(|q) in |e decay. Other solution in (n,n'|g) (-2.7 {I5}) rejected. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of I(2384|g):I(2465|g)=52 {I5}:100 {I8} in |e decay. And 38 {I6}:100 in (|g,|g'). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR |d(D,Q)=+0.36 {I+6-4} or +9 {I+7-3} in (n,n'|g) (1992Be29) if J(2506 level)=3, but |g(|q) does not rule out stretched Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1992Ar06. Other precise E|g: 80.557 {I4} (1963Ma08 cryst), 80.574 {I8} (1962Ha46 cryst.), 80.574 {I4} (1965Sc09 cryst.), 80.53 {I5} (1960Ma19). 
RI %I|g(81)=6.55 {I7} (1994Co02). Other %I(81|g): 6.7 {I5} (1962Cl03); 6.6 {I4} (1981Se09); 6.3 {I4} (1966Ne06); 6.1 {I4} and 7.2 {I6}, respectively, from I(ce(L))/I|b=0.240 {I15} (1966Da04) and I(ce)/I|b=0.49 {I4} (1974Gr41) and E2 theory. 
M from |a(K)exp=1.72 {I6} (1969Ne02), 1.69 {I6} (1971Ca08), 1.76 {I15} (1960Ma19). M+N/L=0.320 {I3} (1966Da04) cf. 0.306 from E2 theory. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1970Re16. Other E|g: 184.5 {I2} (1992Ar06), 184.5 {I10} (1977Al27). 
RI weighted average of 1970Re16, 1977Al27, 1989Ch45. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from Adopted Gammas. 
E weighted average of 705.352 {I26} (1992Ar06), 705.22 {I10} (1977Al27), 705.31 {I4} (1970Re16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=1.4|*10{+-3} {I4} (1974Gr41). 
E weighted average of 1379.437 {I6} (1992Ar06), 1379.36 {I10} (1977Al27), 1379.43 {I6} (1970Re16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M no photon was observed; |a(K)exp|>0.3 (1974Gr41). 
E,TI from ce data (1974Gr41). I(ce(K) 1460)/I(ce(K) 1379)=0.2 {I1}, so I(ce(K) 1460)=0.030 {I15} if |a(K)(1379)=0.00150. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M from linear polarization (1969He02). 
MR from 1968Fo11. 
E weighted average of 1581.833 {I7} (1992Ar06), 1581.88 {I10} (1977Al27), 1581.89 {I8} (1970Re16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 80.573 {I15} (1970Re16), 80.589 {I5} (1975Mo13), 80.572 {I15} (1982So12), 80.56 {I1} (1986Og03), 80.585 {I15} (1988Ad05), 80.566 {I3} (1992Wa33), 80.577 {I7} (1992Ar06). Weighted average is 80.572 {I4}. 
RI this value appears to be too low; intensity balance at the 81 level requires I(|g+ce)(81|g)=|S(I(|g+ce) to 81 level)=138.3 {I5}, so I|g(81)=17.78 {I21} is expected assuming |a(E2 theory)=6.78. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g(%)=69.9 {I14} (1989Da18); 70.21 {I35} (1996Mo11); 72.58 {I22} (1994Mi22); 72.4 {I7} (2000Hi01); 72.6 {I5} (2002Be04). 
E weighted average of 184.407 {I15} (1970Re16), 184.415 {I6} (1975Mo13), 184.42 {I2} (1982So12), 184.41 {I1}(1986Og03), 184.405 {I15} (1988Ad05), 184.404 {I7} (1992Ar06), 184.412 {I3} (1992Wa33). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 280.456 {I20} (1970Re16); 280.46 {I2} (1982So12); 280.46 {I1} (1986Og03); 280.450 {I26} (1988Ad05); 280.450 {I8} (1975Mo13); 280.468 {I7} (1992Ar06); 280.465 {I2} (1992Wa33). Unweighted average is 280.458 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR from Adopted Gammas. 
E weighted average of 705.09 {I7} (1992Ar06), 705.34 {I4} (1992Wa33); 706.2 {I9} (1988Ad05); 705.09 {I7} (1986Og03). Data are discrepant. Unweighted average is 705.4 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 785.81 {I7} (1992Ar06); 785.955 {I17} (1992Wa33); 785.90 {I7} (1988Ad05); 785.81 {I7} (1986Og03). Unweighted average is 785.87 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from Adopted Gammas. Others: -9 {I+5-319} (1975Ba39), -9 {I+5-}Infinity (1981La27); (-8 {I+3-15}, neodimium ethyl sulfate; -12 -29+5, Ho metal) (1981Kr12); -36 {I+32-11} (1990Ha34; sign from table 2, misprinted in table 1). 
E unweighted average of 594.536 {I24} (1992Ar06), 594.423 {I25} (1988Ad05), 594.52 {I3} (1986Og03), 594.36 {I3} (1982So12), 594.48 {I8} (1970Re16). Data are discrepant. Weighted average is 594.47 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1981Kr12. |d from |b{+-} decay: -18 {I+9-}|@ (1975Ba39); (-20 {I+2-4} Ho metal; -18 -8+5, neodimium ethyl sulfate) (1981Kr12); -19 {I+10-}Infinity (1981La27); -45 {I+8-13} (1985Ma22 and 1990Ha34). Note that data from 1981Kr12 and 1990Ha34 do not overlap, however. 
E weighted average of 778.862 {I12} (1992Ar06), 778.818 {I18} (1988Ad05), 778.82 {I2} (1986Og03), 778.81 {I3} (1982So12), 778.82 {I4} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 778.826 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1996Mo11. 
RI weighted average of 0.044 {I14} (1996Mo11) and 0.055 {I14} (2002Be04). 
Placement from 1996Mo11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 365.736 {I9} (1992Ar06), 365.765 {I4} (1992Wa33) 365.741 {I22} (1988Ad05) 365.76 {I2} (1986Og03), 365.74 {I3} (1982So12), 365.739 {I25} (1970Re16), 365.777 {I16} (1975Mo13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1992Wa33. 
RI weighted average of 0.0192 {I11} (1992Wa33) and 0.0195 {I6} (2006Ku03, relative to adopted I(810|g)=79.0). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from Adopted Gammas. |d from |b{+-} decay: -10 {I+4-27} (1975Ba39); 3.8 {I+34-12} or 0.61 {I+18-14} (1981Ka37); -16 -27+4 (1981La27); -16 {I+9-}Infinity (1981Kr12); +566 -522-616 (1990Ha34; solution includes |@). 
E unweighted average of 691.304 {I12} (1992Ar06), 691.260 {I18} (1988Ad05), 691.24 {I3} (1986Og03), 691.24 {I3} (1982So12), 691.21 {I5} (1970Re16). Weighted average is 691.279 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 875.63 {I5} (1992Ar06), 875.658 {I21} (1988Ad05), 875.69 {I4} (1986Og03), 875.60 {I4} (1982So12), 875.64 {I5} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 875.644 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 119.035 {I10} (1992Ar06), 119.040 {I2} (1992Wa33); 119.09 {I4} (1988Ad05); 119.07 {I1} (1986Og03), 119.08 {I4} (1982So12), 119.04 {I3} (1970Re16). (unweighted average is 119.059 {I10}.) 
M,MR D+Q from 119|g-876|g(|q) for intraband |g (1996Al31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Other I|g: I|g(119|g)/I|g(215.8|g)=0.063 {I5} (1969Su07). 
E weighted average of 215.871 {I10} (1992Ar06), 215.889 {I2} (1992Wa33), 215.90 {I1} (1986Og03), 215.91 {I4} (1982So12), 215.875 {I30} (1970Re16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1981La27. Other |d: -85 {I+45-}Infinity (1965Re02); -25 {I3} (1975Ba39); 158 +infinity-130 (1981Ka37); (-60 -45+19, neodimium ethyl sulfate; -62 -40+17, Ho metal) (1981Kr12); -43 {I+5-7} (1990Ha34); . 
E weighted average of 529.811 {I10} (1992Ar06), 529.835 {I18} (1988Ad05), 529.76 {I2} (1986Og03), 529.79 {I3} (1982So12), 529.81 {I3} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 529.801 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 810.325 {I10} (1992Ar06), 810.282 {I16} (1988Ad05), 810.27 {I1} (1986Og03), 810.28 {I2} (1982So12), 810.31 {I4} (1970Re16). Data are discrepant; weighted average is 810.294 {I12}. 
MR from 1990Ha34. Other |d: -37 -10+7 (1965Re02); -20 {I4} (1975Ba39); 24 {I+54-10} (1981Ka37); -20 {I+3-4} (1981La27); (-15 {I1},neodimium ethyl sulfate; -21 {I2} Ho metal) (1981Kr12); -36 {I+7-11} (1985Al22); 1963Ge09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 140.702 {I20} (1992Ar06), 140.692 {I5} (1992Wa33), 140.73 {I4} (1988Ad05), 140.72 {I2} (1986Og03), 140.81 {I10} (1982So12), 140.62 {I4} (1970Re16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Other I|g: I|g(140.7|g)/I|g(259.7|g)=0.037 {I9} (1969Su07). 
E weighted average of 259.70 {I3} (1992Ar06), 259.741 {I3} (1992Wa33), 259.717 {I18} (1988Ad05), 259.76 {I2} (1986Og03), 259.76 {I2} (1982So12), 259.716 {I20} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 259.732 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 304.8 {I1} (1996Mo11), 305.03 {I5} (1992Ar06), 304.86 {I7} (1992Wa33), 304.82 {I4} (1988Ad05), 305.03 {I5} (1986Og03). Data are discrepant. Weighted average is 304.92 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1981Kr12. |d data: (76 +infinity-71 or 1.6 {I+11-3} (1981Ka37)); (+10.0 {I+16-12}, Ho metal; +9.4 {I+29-16}, crystal of neodymium ethyl sulfate) (1981Kr12); +25 {I+17-7} (1985Ma22 and 1990Ha34); however, -20 {I+9-90} (1975Ba39 and 1981La27). 
E unweighted average of 670.565 {I12} (1992Ar06), 670.525 {I21} (1988Ad05), 670.49 {I2} (1986Og03), 670.49 {I2} (1982So12), 670.51 {I4} (1970Re16). Data are discrepant. Weighted average is 670.531 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 950.963 {I10} (1992Ar06), 950.955 {I28} (1988Ad05), 950.97 {I3} (1986Og03), 951.00 {I4} (1982So12), 950.94 {I6} (1970Re16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 160.077 {I20} (1992Ar06), 160.074 {I6} (1992Wa33), 160.09 {I3} (1988Ad05), 160.09 {I2} (1986Og03), 160.09 {I10} (1982So12), 160.06 {I5} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 160.080 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
M,MR from 1985Ma22. 
Other I|g: I|g(160.1|g)/I|g(300.75|g)=0.032 {I4} (1969Su07). 
E weighted average of 300.731 {I9} (1992Ar06), 300.756 {I3} (1992Wa33), 300.730 {I24} (1988Ad05), 300.77 {I1} (1986Og03), 300.77 {I2} (1982So12), 300.744 {I20} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 300.750 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1985Al22. |d data: -80<|d<+30 (1975Ba39); 11 -7+infinity or 0.20 {I+14-12} (1981Ka37); (-13 -15+5, neodimium ethyl sulfate; -51 {I+21-}Infinity, Ho metal) (1981Kr12); -32 -98+14 (1981La27); -63 {I+12-19} (1985Al22); -238 {I+152-303} (1985Ma22); -238 +153+320 (1990Ha34; solution includes |@). 
E weighted average of 464.819 {I12} (1992Ar06), 464.839 {I7} (1992Wa33), 464.825 {I20} (1988Ad05), 464.80 {I3} (1982So12), 464.83 {I4} (1970Re16). Other: 464.76 {I2} (1986Og03), statistical outlier. Unweighted average is 464.823 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1981Kr12. Other |d: -70 -260+30 (1965Re02); -22 {I+5-7} (1975Ba39); 63 -44+infinity (1981Ka37); -22 -7+5 (1981La27); (-16.6 -18+15, neodimium ethyl sulfate; -23 {I4}, Ho metal) (1981Kr12); -18 {I+2-3} (1985Al22); -17.3 {I+13-15} (1990Ha34); 1963Ge09. 
E weighted average of 830.601 {I15} (1992Ar06), 830.583 {I18} (1988Ad05), 830.58 {I2} (1986Og03), 830.57 {I2} (1982So12), 830.56 {I4} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 830.579 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI from 1986Og03. Note that adopted E|g=1263.412 {I16} and that adopted I|g is comparable to that of 1447|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 339.75 {I5} (1992Ar06), 339.807 {I10} (1992Wa33, misprinted as 338.807 in table 1), 339.788 {I25} (1988Ad05), 339.71 {I3} (1986Og03), 339.67 {I4} (1982So12), 339.78 {I8} (1970Re16). Data are discrepant. Weighted average is 339.789 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q), oriented nuclei (Ho metal) (1990Ha34). Other |d: >2 (1975Ba39); |d|<-1 or |d|>+4 (1981Kr12); |d>+1.4 or |d<-6 (1981La27). 
E unweighted average of 644.689 {I15} (1992Ar06), 644.570 {I8} (1992Wa33), 644.598 {I26} (1988Ad05), 644.78 {I5} (1986Og03), 644.51 {I6} (1982So12), 644.45 {I10} (1970Re16). Data are discrepant. Weighted average: 644.598 {I24}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1010.27 {I6} (1992Ar06), 1010.290 {I13} (1992Wa33), 1010.302 {I26} (1988Ad05), 1010.27 {I6} (1986Og03), 1010.25 {I5} (1982So12), 1010.25 {I10} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 1010.272 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 497.0 {I1} (1996Mo11), 496.86 {I4} (1992Ar06), 496.929 {I10} (1992Wa33), 496.935 {I19} (1988Ad05), 496.86 {I4} (1986Og03), 496.88 {I5} (1982So12). Unweighted average: 496.911 {I22}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 616.0 {I1} (1996Mo11); 615.84 {I9} (1992Ar06), 615.85 {I5} (1992Wa33), 616.08 {I8} (1988Ad05), 615.84 {I5} (1986Og03). Unweighted average is 615.92 {I5}. 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
From {+166}Tm |e decay. I|g calculated from I|g(712.89|g):I|g(496.88|g)=(2.19 {I4}):(0.99 {I2}) ({+166}Tm |e decay) and I(496.88|g)=0.172 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 1306.60 {I15} (1992Ar06), 1306.90 {I3} (1992Wa33), 1307.30 {I8} (1988Ad05) and 1306.16 {I15} (1986Og03). (weighted average is 1306.91 {I11}.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 520.86 {I5} (1982So12), 520.85 {I5} (1986Og03), 520.99 {I4} (1988Ad05), 521.0 {I1} (1989Da18), 520.85 {I5} (1992Ar06), 521.041 {I25} (1992Wa33), 521.0 {I1} (1996Mo11). Data are discrepant. Weighted average is 520.97 {I3}. Extremely weak component of 521|g from 786 level will have no significant effect on this E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 639.97 {I9} (1992Ar06), 640.019 {I10} (1992Wa33), 640.003 {I24} (1988Ad05), 639.97 {I5} (1986Og03); 640.0 {I1} (1982So12); unweighted average is 639.992 {I10}. Other E|g: 639.77 {I6} (1970Re16); statistical outlier. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from I(640|g) here and I(737|g)/I(640|g)=2.74 {I12} in |e decay (where the 737|g is not a doublet), I(737|g from 1596 level)=0.351 {I18}. From table above, I|g=0.524 {I5} for doublet, so I|g(737|g from 1692 level) is 0.17 {I3}. 
MR from Adopted Gammas. 
E from 1988Ad05. Others did not deconvolute observed doublet. E|g for doublet: 736.70 {I7} (1992Ar06), 736.653 {I27} (1988Ad05), 736.65 {I4} (1986Og03), 736.68 {I5} (1982So12), 736.67 {I8} (1970Re16); weighted average 736.661 {I19}, unweighted average 736.671 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1331.04 {I13} (1992Ar06), 1331.5 {I5} (1992Wa33), 1331.45 {I14} (1988Ad05), 1331.04 {I13} (1986Og03). Unweighted average is 1331.26 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1120.35 {I5} (1992Ar06), 1120.329 {I14} (1992Wa33), 1120.324 {I28} (1988Ad05), 1120.35 {I5} (1986Og03), 1120.33 {I4} (1982So12), 1120.31 {I7} (1970Re16). Unweighted average: 1120.332 {I6}. 
|d(D,Q)=0.00 {I+3-5} (1981La27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR from Adopted Gammas. Other |d: +0.05 {I+5-7} (1981La27). 
E weighted average of 1400.79 {I2} (1992Ar06), 1400.75 {I4} (1988Ad05); 1400.76 {I5} (1986Og03); 1400.73 {I4} (1982So12), 1400.72 {I8} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 1400.750 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 476.38 {I6} (1992Ar06), 476.380 {I26} (1992Wa33), 476.37 {I4} (1988Ad05), 476.38 {I6} (1986Og03). Unweighted average: 476.3775 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from deconvolution of doublet (1988Ad05). 
RI see comment on 737|g from 1596 level. Doublet intensity has been suitably divided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|d(D,Q)=-0.02 {I+7-6} or +9 {I+9-6} (1981La27). 
E weighted average of 1146.81 {I9} (1992Ar06), 1146.818 {I15} (1992Wa33), 1146.84 {I4} (1988Ad05), 1146.83 {I5} (1986Og03), 1146.86 {I4} (1982So12); 1146.82 {I7} (1970Re16). Unweighted average: 1146.830 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR from Adopted Levels. Other |d: -0.025 {I25} (1981La27). 
E weighted average of 1427.24 {I2} (1992Ar06), 1427.24 {I6} (1988Ad05), 1427.17 {I5} (1986Og03), 1427.25 {I4} (1982So12), 1427.05 {I8} (1970Re16). Unweighted average: 1427.19 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 94.679 {I9} (1992Ar06), 94.672 {I2} (1992Wa33), 94.697 {I23} (1988Ad05), 94.70 {I1} (1986Og03), 94.68 {I3} (1982So12), 94.653 {I30} (1970Re16). Unweighted average: 94.680 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 121.175 {I10} (1992Ar06), 121.174 {I2} (1992Wa33), 121.209 {I26} (1988Ad05), 121.20 {I1} (1986Og03), 121.161 {I30} (1970Re16). Other E|g: 121.30 {I10} (1982So12); statistical outlier. Unweighted average: 121.184 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 190.747 {I16} (1992Ar06), 190.746 {I3} (1992Wa33), 190.759 {I29} (1988Ad05), 190.80 {I3} (1986Og03), 190.81 {I2} (1982So12), 190.711 {I25} (1970Re16). Weighted average is 190.748 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 214.79 {I3} (1992Ar06), 214.814 {I9} (1992Wa33), 214.79 {I2} (1986Og03), 214.79 {I4} (1982So12), 214.76 {I5} (1970Re16). The unweighted average is 214.789 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
Unweighted average of E|g for doublet: 410.950 {I8} (1992Ar06), 410.974 {I5} (1992Wa33), 410.96 {I3} (1988Ad05), 410.95 {I1} (1986Og03), 410.92 {I2} (1982So12), 410.941 {I25} (1970Re16). Weighted average of these data is 410.962 {I6}. 
MR from 1981Kr12. Other |d: -0.27 {I18} (1965Re02); 0.23 {I2} (1963Ge09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 570.940 {I10} (1992Ar06), 571.034 {I18} (1988Ad05), 570.94 {I2} (1986Og03), 570.97 {I3} (1982So12), 570.998 {I30} (1970Re16); data are discrepant. Weighted average is 570.962 {I18}. 
MR from 1981Kr12. Other |d: -0.08 {I+12-8} (1965Re02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 711.680 {I8} (1992Ar06), 711.701 {I24} (1988Ad05), 711.68 {I1} (1986Og03), 711.68 {I2} (1982So12), 711.69 {I4} (1970Re16). Unweighted average: 711.686 {I4}. 
MR from 1981Kr12. Other |d: -0.024 {I29} (1965Re02); +0.01 {I2} (1981La27); 0.06 {I+11-6} (1963Ge09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1241.52 {I2} (1992Ar06), 1241.484 {I28} (1988Ad05); 1241.47 {I4} (1986Og03), 1241.51 {I4} (1982So12), 1241.44 {I6} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 1241.485 {I14}. 
MR from 1981La27. Other |d: -0.09 {I6} (1965Re02); +0.21 {I12} (1981La27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1992Wa33; measured using 50 mm thick Pb filter. 
RI from 1992Wa33. Other I|g: 0.018 {I5} (1988Ad12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 135.257 {I14} (1992Ar06), 135.259 {I4} (1992Wa33), 135.275 {I26} (1988Ad05), 135.30 {I2} (1986Og03), 135.30 {I10} (1982So12), 135.238 {I35} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 135.272 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 161.707 {I14} (1992Ar06), 161.728 {I6} (1992Wa33), 161.78 {I3} (1988Ad05), 161.78 {I2} (1986Og03), 161.75 {I8} (1982So12), 161.75 {I5} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 161.749 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 231.32 {I4} (1992Ar06), 231.320 {I10} (1992Wa33), 231.322 {I26} (1988Ad05), 231.31 {I2} (1986Og03). Other E|g: 231.39 {I3} (1982So12), 231.28 {I4} (1970Re16) (statistical outliers). Unweighted average: 231.318 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 451.528 {I9} (1992Ar06), 451.554 {I6} (1992Wa33), 451.531 {I26} (1988Ad05), 451.53 {I2} (1986Og03), 451.50 {I2} (1982So12), 451.524 {I25} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 451.528 {I7}. 
MR from 1985Ma22. Other |d: -0.17 {I13} (1981Kr12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 611.620 {I17} (1992Ar06), 611.615 {I26} (1988Ad05), 611.49 {I3} (1986Og03), 611.53 {I3} (1982So12), 611.52 {I7} (1970Re16). Data are discrepant. Weighted average is 611.583 {I26}. 
MR from 1981Kr12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 752.332 {I10} (1992Ar06), 752.281 {I19} (1988Ad05), 752.30 {I2} (1986Og03), 752.27 {I3} (1982So12), 752.27 {I4} (1970Re16). Unweighted average is 752.291 {I12}. 
MR from 1981Kr12. Other |d: 0.00 {I2} (1981La27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1282.06 {I6} (1992Ar06), 1282.050 {I19} (1992Wa33), 1282.08 {I4} (1988Ad05), 1282.06 {I6} (1986Og03), 1282.07 {I4} (1982So12). Unweighted average is 1282.064 {I5}. Other E|g: 1282.12 {I7} (1970Re16); statistical outlier. 
MR from 1981La27. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1992Wa33; measured with 50 mm thick Pb filter. 
RI from 0.0047 {I4} (1992Wa33). Other I|g: 0.0040 {I11} (1988Ad12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I(80.6|g)=11.5 {I3} assuming adopted normalization. 
M from L1:L2:L3=2270 {I115}:26700 {I1400}:27500 {I1400} and |a(K)exp=2.2 {I6}; (K:L:M=0.40 {I4}:1:0.32 {I3} (1966Zy01)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3=330 {I20}:580 {I30}:500 {I25} and |a(K)exp=0.19 {I8}.; (K:L:M=2.1 {I1}:1:0.36 {I2} (1966Zy01)). 
MR |d(E2/M3)=+0.09 {I10} (1985DaZV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 520.65 10 (1970Re16); 521.2 10 (1967Bu14) 
L1:L2=0.4 {I2}:0.15 and |a(K)exp=0.012 {I5} for the doublet. 
RI,E I|g is from I|g(521|g from 786 level)/I|g(705|g)=0.0172 {I4} (2006Ku03) and I(705|g). E|g=520.945 {I15}, I|g=1.32 {I3} for doublet in 1989Ad11, so I|g(521|g from 1596 level)=0.32 {I4}. Note, however, that the resulting 521|g branch from the 1596 level is somewhat smaller than the value adopted from |b{+-} decay (1200 y). 1989Ad11 estimated E|g=520.99 {I4}, I|g=0.89 {I9} and E|g=520.92 {I4}, I|g=0.42 {I7} for the respective components of the doublet they observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q) (1987Kr12). Other: -22 {I+13-7} (1980Bu26), -7 {I+23-3} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 
M from L1:L2:L3=7.0 {I7}:0.7 {I1}:0.7 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.0067 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(786|g)/I|g(705|g)=0.906 {I10} (2006Ku03) and I(705|g); in excellent agreement with I|g=52.4 {I11} from 1989Ad11. 
M from L1:L2:L3=3.3 {I10}:1.3 {I4}:0.5 {I2} and |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3=4.5 {I5}:1.3 {I2}:0.8 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.0076 {I20}. 
MR from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). Other |d: >+31 from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26); +5.5 {I+74-22} (1985DaZV); -1.3 {I+3-5} from 594|g-184|g(|q) (1993AdZY), however, evaluator cannot reproduce this value using the authors' stated A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E 778.80 4 (1970Re16); 779.8 6 (1967Bu14) 
MR from Adopted Gammas. Data from |e decay: +8.4 {I7} from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26); +15 {I+26-6} (1985DaZV), +10 {I+130-5} from 598|g-778|g(|q) (1993AdZY), -6.2 {I+10-8} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX); reason for discrepant results is not known. 
M from L1:L2:L3=11 {I1}:2.2 {I3}:1.0 {I2} (|a(K)=4.79|*10{+-3} (E2 theory)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 410.61 14 (1970Re16) 
I|g(411|g):I|g(691|g)=0.0233 {I5}:1.85 (2006Ku03). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.019 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E 691.21 4 (1970Re16); 691.8 5 (1967Bu14) 
MR from Adopted Gammas. |d from |e decay: -3.7 {I5} from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26); -8.5<|d<+7.0 (1985DaZV), -13 {I9} from 691|g-184|g(|q) (1993AdZY), +5.5 {I+28-14} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 
M from L1:L2:L3=5.6 {I6}:0.5 {I2}:0.5 {I2} and |a(K)exp=0.0068 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(875|g):I|g(691|g)=1.026 {I16}:1.85 (2006Ku03). 
M from L1:L2:L3=2.0 {I2}:0.4 {I1}:0.2 and |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I4}. 
MR |d(E2/M3)=-0.07 {I9} (1985DaZV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas; E2 from L1:L2=1.0 {I2}:0.2 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.006 {I2}. 
MR from Adopted Gammas; <-17 from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26). +0.39 {I+19-17} from 810|g-184|g(|q) (1993AdZY); however, evaluator obtains -0.35 {I+9-11} and -3.8 {I+11-21} (first solution preferred) using authors' stated A{-2} and A{-4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR <-0.01 from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26); +0.16 {I4} from 672|g-785|g(|q) (1993AdZY). 
M from L1:L2:L3=1.9 {I2}:0.2 {I1}:0.2 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I5}. 
RI IG(1248.7):IG(727.8):IG(654.4):IG(557.5)=5 2:11.5 3:11 1:11 2 (1967Bu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas; consistent with |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I12} (1979Ad06) and 0.0021 {I4} (1993BaZS). 
E 1265.3 10 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2=6.7 {I7}:1.0 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.10 {I2}. 
MR from A{-2}=+0.22 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I15} for 215|g-345|g(|q) (1993AdZY). Other |d: 0.75 {I25} from ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2=7 {I1}:0.8 {I3} and |a(K)exp=0.053 {I12}. 
MR from A{-2}=+0.05 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I15} for 215|g-404|g(|q) (1993AdZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas. M1 from L1:L2:L3=14 {I2}:1.0 {I2}:0.3 and |a(K)exp=0.043 {I9}. 
MR from Adopted Gammas. |d=-0.17 {I3} from A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} for 215|g-460|g(|q) and |d=-0.21 {I9} from A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I9} for 460|g-672|g(|q) (1993AdZY). 
RI IG(1652.8):IG(459.6):IG(403.9):IG(389.4):IG(345.6)= 20 6:124 10:37 4:2.8 LT:15.5 15 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR <-0.03 from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26); -0.05 {I8} from A{-2}=-0.10 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I16} for 1653|g-184|g(|q) (1993AdZY). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0005 {I2}. 
E 1654.6 15 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I14} (1979Ad06,1989Ad11) and 0.0033 {I5} (1993BaZS). 
RI IG(1152.3):IG(1078.9)=55 6:6.5 30 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3=110 {I11}:10 {I1}:2.5. |a(K)exp=21 {I9} is not consistent with M1; probably I|g or Ice contained a typographical error. 
E,RI from 1979Ad06; not reported in 1989Ad11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M from Adopted Gammas. E1 from |a(K)exp=0.8|*10{+-3} {I4} (1979Ad06), 0.00092 {I20} (1993BaZS). 
MR from Adopted Gammas. Other |d: +0.1 {I2} (1985DaZV), +0.05 {I10} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI from 1989Ad11; E|g=215.185 {I185} 14, I|g=28.0 {I9} for doublet. 
M from L1:L2:L3=22 {I3}:3.7 {I4}:4.2 {I5} and |a(K)exp=0.034 {I7}. 
MR from 1985DaZV. Other |d: -0.04 {I8} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I2}. 
E 1177.8 6 (1967Bu14) 
MR weighted average of +0.24 {I4} from 1177|g-876|g(|q) (1993AdZY), +0.11 {I7} from 1177|g-876|g(|q) (1993AdZY) and +0.16 {I11} (1985DaZV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I2}. 
MR -0.11 {I8} (1985DaZV); however, |d=+0.30 {I6} from 1273|g-778|g(|q) (1993AdZY). 
E 1275.3 6 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26). Others: 3.7 {I+57-18} (1987Kr12). +4.3 {I+10-7} from 1868|g-184|g(|q) (1993AdZY), +3.6 {I+24-12} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.81|*10{+-3} {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26). Others: +9 {I+19-4} (1985DaZV), +6.0 {I+76-24} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 
E 2053.7 10 (1967Bu14) 
RI IG(2052.4):IG(1868):IG(1346.9):IG(1273.4):IG(1176.6): IG(560.8):IG(194.7):IG(154.5):IG(131.0)=770 80:145 15:32 3: 610 60:390 40:9.5 20:36 4:9.5 10:27 3 (1967Bu14). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.77|*10{+-3} {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I2}. 
MR weighted average of -0.18 {I7} (1985DaZV) and -0.09 {I4} from 1374|g-785|g(|q) (1993AdZY). Others: +0.01 {I14} from 1374|g-705|g(|q) (1993AdZY), -0.34 {I+17-12} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 
E 1374.9 8 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26) based on %E2=87.4 and %M1=12.6 {I3}. Other: +2.3 {I+6-4} from 1895|g-184|g(|q) (1993AdZY) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.76|*10{+-3} {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.72|*10{+-3} {I7}. 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26). Others: +10+|@-6 (1985DaZV), +10 +|@-6 from |g(|q,H,t) (1995KrZX). 
E 2080.9 10 (1967Bu14) 
RI IG(2079.6):IG(1895.3):IG(1374.1):IG(1300.6):IG(1203.8)= 270 27:42 5:200 20:52 LT:52 4 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.99|*10{+-3} {I44}. 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu26). 
E 2094.2 10 (1967Bu14) 
RI IG(2093.3):IG(1907.5):IG(1313.4)=65 7:13 4:13 4 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1993BaZS. 
M M1+E2 from L1/L2=0.25, L2/L3=1.3 (1993BaZS). However, level scheme requires E1. Consequently, placement is shown as uncertain here and transition is omitted from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I10}. 
MR from 1985DaZV. 
E 1506.6 10 (1967Bu14) 
RI IG(2210.6):IG(1505):IG(1430.5)=15 6:350 40:300 50 (1967Bu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M E2,M1 from |a(K)exp=0.7|*10{+-3} {I4}; D from Adopted Gammas. 
RI IG(2678.8):IG(2596.8)=30 7:24 6 (1967Bu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.31 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1976We24); inconsistent with stretched Q required by level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.017 {I38}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I5}, |d=-84 {I+57}- infinity (1976We24) implies mult=(E2+M1), |d<-27 for multiply-placed |g. Based on adopted branching from 1075 level, most or all of I(810.3|g) is attributable to this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I9} (1976We24). 
MR -1.2 {I+4-8} or -6 + infinity -3 from |g(|q); |a(K)exp<|a(K)(E2) and <|a(K)(M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.22 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I17} (1976We24) imply D+Q, |d=-3.1 {I+9-15} but transition is multiply-placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
MR A{-2}=+0.03 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.25 {I10} imply |d(D,Q)=-11 {I+3}- infinity (1976We24); however transition may be doubly-placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from weighted average of |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=1.50 {I6} (1996Ma18), 1.50 {I4} (1991Zi01) and 1.63 {I7} (1973Me17). 
M from 1973Me17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI weak branch; consistent with |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}|?3 expected by authors from earlier decay studies (1973Me17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.051 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.035 {I13} (1992Be29, 2000De59), P(|g)=0.73 {I+8-10} (1992Be29). 
1/|d(D,Q)=0.00 {I2} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.139 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} (1992Be29). A{-2}=-0.136 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (2000De59). 
MR -45 {I+19-137} from 2000De59; -23 {I+7-120} from 1992Be29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.054 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.064 {I12}, P(|g)=1.32 {I+22-15} (1992Be29). A{-2}=+0.052 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.061 {I12} (2000De59). 
MR -75 {I+26-134} from 2000De59; -67 {I+30-44} from 1992Be29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.180 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.119 {I14} (1992Be29, 2000De59), P(|g)=0.39 {I+7-11} (1992Be29). 
1/|d(D,Q)=0.00 {I2} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.143 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3}, P(|g)=0.52 {I+15-17} (1992Be29). 
MR -21 {I+5-111} from |g(|q) (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.204 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.052 {I24} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.08 {I+9-6} or +1.55 {I+21-23} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.339 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.051 {I20}, P(|g)=1.8 {I+10-7} (1992Be29). 
+0.2<|d(D,Q)<+0.8 (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.288 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, P(|g)=0.7 {I+4-3} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.03 {I+10-6} or +1.02 {I+14-18} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.005 {I10}, A{-4}=0.0, P(|g)=1.02 {I+28-23} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.04 {I+8-9} or -3.0 {I+7-11} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.388 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I23}, P(|g)=3.7 {I+150-18} (1992Be29). 
+0.08<|d(D,Q)<+0.65 (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.300 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3}, P(|g)=2.0 {I+12-6} (1992Be29). 
MR +0.41 {I+7-4} or +4.2 {I8} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.018 {I16}, A{-4}=0.0 (1992Be29). 
|d(D,Q)=+0.09 {I+25-15} or 1/|d=-0.20 {I+25-16} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I10}, P(|g)=2.0 {I+12-6} (1992Be29). 
-0.007<|d(D,Q)<+1.3 (1992Be29), mult=D+Q for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.053 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.015 {I23} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.22 {I+4-3} or +4.9 {I+7-8} (1992Be29). 
Placement from 1992Be29; no other evidence exists for this level or for a 2089 level from which the 1824|g was placed previously. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1981Bo40 show two placements for this |g but, based on adopted branching from the 2046 level, all its intensity can be exhausted by this placement alone. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6}, P(|g)=2.0 {I+12-6} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.03 {I+12-6} or +1.40 {I+23-27} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1992Be29) for doubly-placed |g. 
MR +0.20 {I3} or -22 {I+8-57} (1992Be29) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I8} (1992Be29) for doubly-placed |g. 
MR -0.11 {I+5-8} or -2.7 {I+5-6} (1992Be29) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1992Be29. 
M A{-2}=-0.06 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I8} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.47 {I+14-19} or 1/|d=-0.02 {I+12-13} (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I8} (1992Be29) for doubly-placed |g. 
MR -0.11 {I+5-8} or -2.7 {I+5-6} (1992Be29) for doublet.. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I9} (1992Be29). 
MR -0.15 {I+5-10} or -2.4 {I+4-5} (1992Be29). 
E presumed to be the 1505|g mentioned in 1992Be29; unplaced in 1981Bo40. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5}, P(|g)=1.1 {I+11-6} (1992Be29). 
E presumed to be the 1629|g mentioned in 1992Be29; unplaced in 1981Bo40. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1992Be29. 
M A{-2}=+0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I7} (1992Be29). 
MR -3.2 {I+11-7} or -0.19 {I+8-9} (1992Be29) if J(2441)=3; +2.3 {I+6-5} or -0.41 {I10} (1992Be29) if J(2441)=4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1992Be29. 
M A{-2}=-0.014 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.17 {I10} (1992Be29); not consistent with stretched Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from 1992Be29. 
M A{-2}=+0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1992Be29). 
MR |d(D,Q)=+0.36 {I+6-4} or +9 {I+7-3} (1992Be29) if J(2506 level)=3, but |g(|q) does not rule out stretched Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2 From<2+{-|g} M(E2) 2+{-g}> =+0.518 {I26} (1992Fa01). 
A{-2}=-0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.46 {I7} and A{-2}=-0.24 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.40 {I12} (1972Do01). 
MR from 1972Do01. Others: -38 {I+24}- infinity (1972Do01); |>25 (1978Mc02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2 From<2+{-|g} M(E2) 0+{-g}> =+0.372 {I19} (1992Fa01). 
I|g(786|g)/I|g(705|g)=0.85 {I4} and 80 {I5} (1972Do01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI this value appears to be an order of magnitude too large; evaluator suspects a typographical error in 1992Fa01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2 From<4+{-|g} M(E2) 4+{-g}> =+0.727 {I36} (1992Fa01). 
A{-2}=-0.47 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.55 {I9} (1972Do01). 
MR from 1972Do01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2 From<4+{-|g} M(E2) 2+{-g}> =+0.315 {I16} (1992Fa01). 
I|g(876|g)/I|g(691|g)=0.53 {I5} (1972Do01). 
A{-2}=+0.51 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.43 {I19} (1972Do01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 6.636 {I49} (CMI measurement) and 6.61 {i7} (LNHB measurement). Value is 6.62 {I7} for LNHB measurement in Table 5 (compilers note). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. 
$I(|g+ce)|?250 from intensity balance at 264.9 level in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=10.3 {I19} based on I(351|g):I(430|g)=3.3 {I6}:2.6 {I4} in (n,n'|g) and I|g=91 {I27} in (n,|g). E|g(430) is a little high in (n,n'|g); this may perhaps indicate the presence of a contaminant, resulting in an overestimate of I(430|g) and an underestimate of 351|g branching. I|g(351)I|g(430)=3.3 {I6}/2.6 {I4} in (n,n'|g), where 83|g was masked by an impurity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 430.0 {I3} in (n,|g) and 430.0 {I5} in |b{+-} decay. Other E|g: 430.8 {I2} in (n,n'|g). 
RI$from |b{+-} decay. Other I|g: |?25 in (n,|g) after large correction for contaminant. I|g(430)I|g(351)=2.6 {I4}/3.3 {I6} in (n,n'|g), where 83|g was masked by an impurity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from |b{+-} decay, (n,|g) and (n,n'|g). 
RI$from |b{+-} decay. Others: 16.7 {I24} in (n,|g), 31 {I6} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from |b{+-} decay and (n,|g). Complex line at 398.85 {I10} in (n,n'|g) 
RI$from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 810.53 {I12} in (n,|g) and 810.53 {I11} in (n,n'|g). Other E|g: 812.5 in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=403.11 {I25}, I|g=0.14 {I4} (1965Ko13) 
$E|g=403.20 {I15}, I|g=0.140 {I20} (1970Mi01), |?20% of total I|g=0.186 {I25} from {+150}Sm 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1970Mi01 attribute <10% of total intensity=1.48 {I8} to {+168}Er. 
$E|g=498.6 {I3}, I|g=3.0 {I6} (1965Ko13, intensity seems too high) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placed by evaluators, based on (n,n'|g) results. Unplaced by 1970Mi01, but authors suggested that, although 810.5|g fits well between the 1384.4 and 573.8 levels, it is unreasonable to place it there because of its high intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$doublet; 1970Mi01 attribute |?40% of intensity to {+168}Er; total I|g=0.97 {I9}. Theory predicts very low intensity for 645.7|g relative to I|g values for other transitions from 1059.0 level to the 1/2[521] rotational band; a component of 645.7|g, therefore, probably belongs elsewhere. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition masked by strong background line resulting from (n,n'|g) on germanium; E|g is from Adopted Gammas, I|g from I|g(256.2|g) and adopted branching from 434.4 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$4.0 {I13} can be deduced from I|g(315 doublet)=5.7 {I5}, I(399|g)=4.9 {I5} and adopted I|g(315.4|g)/I|g(398.8|g)=0.81 {I24}; however, the 399|g in (n,n'|g) is also complex, so this gives only an upper limit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1979Bo44 attribute |?30% of intensity to background line from (n,n'|g) on germanium; total I|g=3.4 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$1979Bo44 attribute |?50% of intensity to background line from (n,n'|g) on germanium; total I|g=1.9 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=86 {I2} for most intense |g for stopped nuclei with gate at 293|g from 17/2+ 
$I|g=100 for most intense |g for stopped nuclei with gate at 439|g from 25/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Evaluators consider the placement of this transition from 19/2+ to 13/2+ as questionable, since implied mult=M3, which is highly unlikely. This |g ray is not included in the Adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$I|g=100 for most intense |g for stopped nuclei with gate at 368|g from 21/2+ 
$I|g=53 {I2} for most intense |g for stopped nuclei with gate at 508|g from 29/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=79.3 (1969Tv01) 
$|a(K)exp from (x ray)|g-coin (1966As02). 
MR$from |d{+2}=0.10 (1971Da17), with 20% uncertainty assumed by evaluators; sign from 1966As02. Magnitude disagrees with |d=-0.20 {I4} from p|g|g(|q) (1966As02); 1971Da17 suggest that |g|g(|q) results in 1966As02 may have been affected by hyperfine interactions. |d=0.40 {I11} from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E|g=98.3 (1969Tv01) 
$|a(K)exp from (x ray)|g-coin (1966As02). 
MR$weighted average of -0.27 {I3} (1966As02, p|g|g(|q)) and -0.45 {I15} (1985Oh03, -0.45 {I15} from |g(|q) and -0.6 {I10} from DCO ratio). Other |d: 0.71 {I16} from |a(K)exp (1966As02); 0.33 {I+17-10} (1959De29); 0.302 {I20} deduced from crossover-to-cascade branching ratio and using Eq. 2 (1969Tv01) is in agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E|g=1116.1 (1969Tv01) 
MR$from 1985Oh03 (average of -0.33 {I15} from |g(|q), -0.15 {I15} and -0.24 {I50} from DCO ratios). Evaluators obtain averaged |d=-0.24 {I10}. Other |d: 0.296 {I30}, deduced from crossover-to-cascade branching ratio and using Eq. 2 (1969Tv01) is in agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E|g=214.8 (1969Tv01) 
$Evaluators note that positive A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition 
$Measured I|g(215.6|g)/I|g(116.9|g)=0.80 {I5} (1966Bo16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E|g=138.7 (1969Tv01) 
MR$from 1985Oh03 (average of -0.20 {I10} from |g(|q), -1.0 {I10} and -0.35 {I15} from DCO ratios). Other |d: 0.304 {I40}, deduced from crossover-to-cascade branching ratio and using Eq. 2 (1969Tv01) is in agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$Evaluators note that positive A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition 
$E|g=255.2 (1969Tv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$from 1985Oh03 (average of -0.30 {I10} from |g(|q), -0.30 {I15} and -0.9 {I6} from DCO ratios). 
$Evaluators note that negative A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=1, dipole + quadrupole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.15 {I45} from DCO ratio in 1985Oh03, but this does not include uncertainty in alignment attenuation factors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.20 {I10} from |g(|q) in 1985Oh03, but this does not include uncertainty in alignment attenuation factors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=79.3 {I2} (1968Fu09) 
$K:L1=|?250:50 (1962Ha24) 
$L2 is weak (1962Ha24) 
M,MR$from the Adopted Gammas; |a(K)exp in {+167}Ho |b{+-} decay gives M1+E2 with |d|?1.2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from intensity balance at 207.8 level. 
E,M,MR$from the Adopted Gammas, based on subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Unobserved, but expected from decay scheme; E|g deduced from energy difference between 281.6 and 264.9 levels. I(|g+ce) deduced from intensity balance at 264.9 level. 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a(theory) for M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=131.7 {I3} (1968Fu09) 
RI$see comment with 131|g from 668 level; remaining intensity is attributed to 131.7|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=83.5 {I2} (1968Fu09) 
$K:L1:L2=|?150:30:|?15 (1962Ha24) 
MR$from |a(K)exp and K, L1, L2 ratios using BrIccMixing code, assuming 50% uncertainty in |a(K)exp, K and L2 intensities and 20% in L1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas; transition probably not resolved from 346.5|g in {+167}Ho |b{+-} decay (1968Fu09) 
RI$deduced from I|g(83.5|g) and adopted |g branching ratio for 430.0 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Observed in coincidence spectrum only. 
RI$deduced from intensity balance at 536.3 level; I|g(131|g+131.7|g)=0.2 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=321.3 {I2} (1968Fu09) 
MR$from combined fit to |a(K)exp and K/L1 ratio, assuming 20% uncertainty in each value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$Measured absolute intensity=41.9% {I16} (2016Ch04) 
$Other E|g=207.8 (1968Fu09) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=19.76 {I24}:2.0 {I2}:16.7 {I17}:10.0 {I10}, and K:M:N:O:=19.76 {I24}:7.5 {I8}:2.0 {I3}:0.3 {I1} (1979ArZU) 
$K:L2:L3:M:N=1000:820:430:370:100 (1959Ha09); L1/L2=0.16 {I1} and L1/L3=0.25 {I1} (1987BaZB); K/L=0.72 {I7} (1957Mi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from I|g(207.8|g) and Ice(L)(57.1|g)/Ice(K)(207.8|g)=18.7 {I9}/19.76 {I24} (1979ArZU). 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=7.3 {I6}:5.6 {I4}:5.8 {I5}:1.5 {I2}:1.4 {I2}:1.5 {I2}, and L1:M45:N:O=7.3 {I6}:0.04 {I2}:1.1 {I1}:0.14 {I3} (1979ArZU); L1/L2=1.43 {I4}, L1/L3=1.17 {I3} (1987BaZB); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=280:235:245:180:50 (1959Ha09) 
MR$deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code 
$|a(L)exp=18.3 {I7} in 1991Mu15 implying |d=2.7 {I+6-4} seems discrepant in view of much lower |d(E2/M1) value from subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
RI$upper limit of 0.46 {I6} deduced from I|g(207.8|g) and Ice(L)(264.9|g)/Ice(K)(207.8|g)|<0.1/19.76 {I24} (1979ArZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Measured absolute intensity=1.73% {I7} (2016Ch04) 
$K:L1:M=2.2:0.35:0.1 (1959Ha09) 
$Other E|g=531.5 (1968Fu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
BE2W From measured B(E2) in Coulomb excitation. 
E from level energy difference. Existence implied in Coulomb excitation; possibly obscured in (n,|g) E=thermal by 99|g from 1193 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI E|g from level energy difference. Unobserved |g needed for intensity balance at the 1217 level in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 38 {I10} from |b{+-} decay. 
M,MR D+Q with |d=-5.0 {I+19-26} from (n,n'|g). |a(K)exp in (n,|g) and |e decay is consistent with pure M1 but allows small E0 component; 1999Wo07 estimate |r{+2}=0.8|*10{+-3} {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 28.7 {I19} from {+170}Er({+136}Xe,X|g), 28.2 {I22} from 1991DaZT in (n,|g) E=thermal and 25 {I3} from (n,n'|g). Other: 20.6 {I8} (2007ChZX, Budapest data) in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR estimate from (n,|g) E=thermal based on Alaga rule. 
BE2 From measured B(E2) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp in (n,|g) E=thermal implies |d<0.22, but measured B(E2) requires nonzero E2 component. 
BE2 From measured B(E2) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 11.5 {I14} from 1991DaZT in (n,|g) E=thermal and 16.1 {I13} from {+170}Er({+136}Xe,X|g). Other I|g: 16.2 {I25} (2007ChZX) from (n,|g) E=thermal for probable doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI estimate from I|g(1351.2|g)/I|g(422.3|g) for 1615.3 level in {+168}Tm |e decay and I|g(1352.5|g)/I|g(1068.1|g) for 1616.8 level in {+167}Er(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E rounded value from level energy difference; |g expected but not observed. 
RI from {+170}Er({+136}Xe,X|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from |b{+-} decay. Other I|g: 60 {I16} from (n,|g) E=thermal for doubly-placed |g. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I4}, mult=E2 for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI seen only in (n,|g) E=thermal two-photon cascade data. Placement shown as uncertain because such a strong branch should have been seen in other studies but was not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Note that mult=E2 from (n,|g) E=thermal is in conflict with placement of the M1 362|g from the same level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
From |b{+-} decay. Other E|g (I|g): 1530.1 {I3} (22 {I3}) from (n,n'|g), 1529.67 {I17} (20 {I7}) from (n,|g) E=thermal. 
Placement questioned in (n,|g) E=thermal but branching is consistent with that in |b{+-} decay and (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
From |b{+-} decay. Other E|g (I|g): 1603.8 {I2} (58 {I13} )from (n,n'|g), 1604.09 {I18} (34 {I14}) from (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
From |b{+-} decay. Other E|g (I|g): 2345.6 {I4} (100 {I25}) from (n,n'|g), 2345.58 {I17} (100 {I20}) from (n,|g) E=thermal. 
Placement questioned in (n,|g) E=thermal but branching is consistent with that in |b{+-} decay and (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from |b{+-} decay. Other E|g (I|g): 2425.1 {I2} (44 {I2}) from (n,n'|g), but 2425.35 {I20} (100 {I18}) from (n,|g) E=thermal. Possibly transition is a doublet in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp in (n,|g) E=thermal for doubly-placed |g. 
Other E|g: 1283.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2 From measured B(E2) in Coulomb excitation. 
E from level energy difference. |g seen in Coulomb excitation but E|g not stated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E for multiply-placed |g. 
RI from I(2229|g):I(2970|g) in two-photon cascade experiment in (n,|g) E=thermal and 2970|g branching here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. Other E|g: 687.6 from level energy difference in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI from adopted branching and I(99|g doublet)=0.85 {I15} and I(198|g) here, I(99|g from 1094 level)=0.59 {I8} leaving I|g=0.26 {I17} to deexcite the 1193 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E|g=673.48 {I13}, I|g=0.106 {I14} reported by 1973Ti02 but half-life was unexpectedly long. 
RI from I(748|g) and adopted I(674)/I(748|g)=0.380 {I21}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI from I(423|g) and adopted I(720|g)/I(422|g)=0.72 {I8}. |g possibly unresolved from stronger 720|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 0.40 {I8} for |g contaminated with a {+56}Co line. Other I|g: 0.88 {I8} (1973Ka07). 
Placed by evaluator consistent with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 1973Ti02 and 1973Ka07 placed |g from 1995 level instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M K:L1:L2:L3=37.4:3.7:37.4:37.0 (1975Ab06). 
%I|g=10.94 {I13} assuming recommended decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M K:L1=0.13:0.024 (1975Ab06). 
MR from |e decay: 1/(-0.003 {I8}) (i.e. |d<-91 or |d>+200) from 720|g-741|g(|q) (1998Al15); |d=+32 {I+24-9} from 741|g-890|g(|q) (1998Al15); |d=-28 {I+6-12} from |g|g(|q) (1981Iw04); -28 {I+9-23} (1975Be43); |d=+64 {I+135-26} from 720|g-741|g(|q) (1971La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K:L1=0.13:0.028 (1975Ab06). 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1981Iw04). Others: -4.9 {I3} (1975Be43); |d>71 (1975Ab06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K:L1=0.43:0.076 (1975Ab06). 
MR data from |e decay: 1/(+0.005 {I15}) (i.e., |d<-100 or |d>+50) from 816|g-80|g(|q) (1998Al15); +20 {I4} from |g|g(|q) (1981Iw04); +17 {I3} (1975Be43); +13 {I+9-3} (1975Ab06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E|g=447.501 {I2} for (446|g+448|g) doublet (1987Me04). 
M K:L1:L2:L3=2.0:0.31:0.048:0.01 (1975Ab06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M K:L1=0.055:0.014 (1975Ab06). 
|g|g(|q) data (1975Be43) consistent with D+Q and |d|>+12 or |<-47; |d=+30 {I+170-14} from |g|g(|q) (1981Iw04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M K:L1:L2:L3=4.13:0.8:0.12:0.12 (1975Ab06). 
MR -0.12 {I3} from |g|g(|q) in text and abstract of 1981Iw04 (but -0.13 {I2} in table II and fig. 5). Others: <0.095 (1975Ab06), +0.02 {I2} (1975Be43). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference. 
TI required for intensity balance at 1217.2 level. 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=1351.575 {I5} for (1351.2|g+1351.5|g) doublet (1987Me04). 
E from level-energy difference. 
RI estimate from apparent total I|g for doublet and I|g deduced for 1351.5|g. 
MR from 720|g-821|g(|q) (1998Al15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 2000Gr34 report a 741.0|g deexciting the 1737 level based on their two-photon cascade coin data. However, adopted branching for the 821 level implies that all or most of I(741.3|g) deexcites this level. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I3}; |a(L1)exp=0.00069 {I9}; |a(L2)exp=0.00007 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from L1/L3=0.203 {I8} (1980Sc15). Other: L1/L3=0.20 {I2} (1991DaZT). 
Other E|g (I|g): 74.88 {I4} (54 {I3}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00414 {I15}; |a(L1)exp=0.00058 {I3}; |a(L2)exp=0.000092 {I8}; |a(L3)exp=0.000053 {I5}. 
MR from sub-shell ratios (1987Ge02); inconsistent with adopted |d=+17.7 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.30 {I5}; |a(L3)exp=0.0090 {I15}. 
Other E|g (I|g): 99.07 {I3} (251 {I9}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data); presumably for 99.0|g+99.3|g doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from L1/L3=0.572 {I30} (1980Sc15, 1987Ge02). Others: L1/L2=0.51 {I10}, L1/L3=0.57 {I4} (1991DaZT). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M L1/L2=0.25 {I2}; L1/L3=0.23 {I2}. 
RI from 1991DaZT. Other: 37.2 {I15} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I(538|g doublet)=0.73 {I14} and adopted branching, I(538|g from 1359 level)=0.61 {I13}, so I(538|g from 2663 level)=0.12 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1994Ju02 suggest that the stronger component of this doublet deexcites the 1358 level. Based on adopted branching from the 1359 level and I(1279|g) here, the observed I|g=31.5 {I28} comprises I|g=20 {I3} for this placement, and I|g=12 {I4} deexciting a 2255 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M L1/L2=0.5 {I2}; L1/L3=0.5 {I2}. 
Other E|g (I|g): 137.39 {I10} (8.3 {I13}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data); probably includes 137.97|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I6}, as deduced from unresolved Ice for 546.8|g+547.0|g and |a(K)=0.0039 (E1 theory) for 547.0|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I5}, as deduced from unresolved Ice for 645.8|g+645.9|g and |a(K)=0.00276 (E1 theory) for 645.9|g. 
Other I|g: 65 {I3} (2007ChZX, Budapest data); may include 645.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 547.07 {I5} (69 {I3}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data); may include 546.8|g. 
M see comment with 546.8|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0008 {I1}. 
RI I|g(exp)=157 {I18} (1991DaZT) for doublet. Based on adopted branching for 3- 1541.6 level and I(448|g) here, I|g=14.6 {I5} deexcites that level leaving I|g=142 {I18} for this placement. Other E|g (I|g): 1277.57 {I8} (190 {I11}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data), presumably for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI much greater than (|?11 times) corresponding intensity in {+168}Tm |e decay, suggesting that 1489.5|g may be a multiplet in {+167}Er(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I7}. 
RI weighted average of 44 {I7} (1991DaZT) and 22.8 {I20} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0092 {I20}, mult=E2 for doubly-placed |g. 
Other E|g (I|g): 539.1 {I4} (4.7 {I20}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E differs from the unplaced 916.0 {I5} transition reported by 1996Gi09 because the latter is coincident with a 1786.09|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I6}, as deduced from unresolved Ice for 702.6|g+702.9|g and |a(K)=0.00223 (E1 theory) for 702.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 702.90 {I15} (19.5 {I27}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data), presumed to be for 702.6|g+702.9|g doublet. 
M see comment with 702.6|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 7.8 {I12} (1991DaZT) and 4.7 {I20} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0048 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I(1833.4|g+1834.0|g) in ce spectrum, and deduced multipolarity. Other E|g (I|g): 1834.01 {I11} (94 {I6}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data), presumed to be for doublet. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0005 {I1}, as deduced from unresolved Ice for 1833.4|g+1834.0|g assuming |a(K)(E1 theory)=0.0005 for 1833.4|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0031 {I4}. 
RI weighted average of 14.5 {I25} (1991DaZT) and 6.7 {I20} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0008 {I3}. 
RI weighted average of 19 {I3} (1991DaZT) and 12.1 {I20} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(1921.1|g+1922.6|g), ce spectrum, and multipolarities. 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I2}, as deduced from unresolved Ice for 1921.1|g+1922.6|g and |a(K)=0.0004 (E1 theory) for 1921.1|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3}; |a(L1)exp=0.00023 {I5}. 
Other E|g (I|g): 1767.22 {I12} (61 {I5}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.075 {I10}. 
An alternative placement from 2188.6 level (1994Ju02) is not supported by |g|g coin data of 1996Gi09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(1921.1|g+1922.6|g), ce spectrum, and multipolarities. Other E|g (I|g): 1921.81 {I18} (37 {I4}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data), presumably for doublet. 
M see comment with 1922.6|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.034 {I4}. 
Other E|g (I|g): 480.94 {I16} (6.8 {I11}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data); probably includes 480.6|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00085 {I20}. 
Placement from 2238 level by 1991Da12 is unconfirmed by |g|g coin from 1996Gi09, but supported by two-photon cascade data from 2000Gr34, so placement is shown as uncertain. 
RI weighted average of 59 {I7} (1991DaZT) and 39 {I3} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 
Other E|g: 1143.76 {I11} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0005 {I3}, mult=E1 for multiply-placed |g. 
1991Da12's placement from 2263 level rejected by 1994Ju02 based on their |g|g coin data; however, two-photon cascade data of 2000Gr34 do support this placement. Consequently, placement is shown here as tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 1992BoZF. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I5}, mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g. 
Other I|g: 18.8 {I27} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1991Da12's placement from 2298 level questioned by 1994Ju02 but confirmed by |g|g coin data of 1996Gi09. 
Other I|g: 9.4 {I27} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
I(13009|g):I(1482|g)=3.3 {I10}:2.2 {I7} (2000Gr34). 
E,RI seen only in (n,|g) E=thermal two-photon cascade work. Placement shown as uncertain because such a strong branch should have been seen in other studies but was not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0019 {I3} implies E2(+M1), but placement requires E1. Placed from 1902 level also in (n,n'|g), so 1354|g may be a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement from 2393 level by 1991Da12 rejected based on |g|g coin in 1996Gi09 but supported by |g|g coin in two-photon cascade study by 2000Gr34, so placement shown as uncertain here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.075 {I18} implies M1 multipolarity. However, see comment on 1200|g. 
Placement from 2451 level by 1991Da12 rejected based on |g|g coin in 1996Gi09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Alternative placement from 2559 level (1994Ju02) rejected by evaluator because E|g fits that placement very poorly and implied multipolarity would be high. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I5}, mult=E2; inconsistent with placement of 362|g from same level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I5} for multiply-placed |g; consistent with M1. 
Placement from 2474 level in 1991Da12 inconsistent with |g|g coin in 1994Ju02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
1991Da12's placement from 2412 level rejected by 1996Gi09 based on |g|g coin data; however, two-photon cascade data from 2000Gr34 appear to confirm this placement. Consequently, placement is retained but shown as uncertain here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 51 {I7} (1991DaZT) and 38 {I3} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 
M |a(K)exp=0.00051 {I7}, mult=E1 for doubly-placed |g. 
Placement from 2412 level by 1991Da12 confirmed by 2-photon cascade data from 2000Gr34 but rejected by 1996Gi09 based on |g|g coin data, so placement shown as uncertain here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from 2332 level by 1991Da12 rejected based on |g|g coin in 1996Gi09. The present placement is supported by |g|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement from 2425 level by 1991Da12 rejected by 1996Gi09 based on |g|g coin. However, |g is placed from 2425 level in |b{+-} decay and (n,n'|g) also, so placement is retained here and shown as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement from 2425 level by 1991Da12 rejected by 1996Gi09 based on |g|g coin. However, |g is placed from 2425 level in |b{+-} decay and (n,n'|g) also, so placement is retained here but shown as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I5}, mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g. 
Other I|g: 18.8 {I27} (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1994Ju02's placement from 2440.1 level not supported by |g|g coin data of 1996Gi09. Placed by evaluator consistent with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 
Other I|g: 13.4 {I27}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00078 {I9} for doubly-placed |g. 
Other E|g (I|g): 1657.44 {I25} (19 {I3}) (2007ChZX, Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement from 2478 level by 1991Da12 rejected by 1996Gi09 based on |g|g coin; however, two-photon cascade data of 2000Gr34 indicate 5393|g-2398|g coin, so placement from 2478 level is is shown here as uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0005 {I3}, mult=E1 for multiply-placed |g. 
Placed based on |g|g coin (1996Gi09). |g|g coin (1994Ju02) ruled out 1991Da12's placement from 2263 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I(1577|g):I(1675|g)=4.0 {I14}:3.9 {I14} from 2571 level (2000Gr34). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}, mult=E1,E2 for multiply-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00153 {I25}. 
|g|g coin from 1994Ju02 and 1996Gi09 rule out 1991Da12's placement from 2562 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I5}. 
Also placed from 2273 level in 1994Ju02 but |g|g coin (1996Gi09) does not confirm that placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI I(1839|g):I(1939|g)=13.0 {I25}:4.5 {I14} (2000Gr34). Placement shown as tentative because |g with this strength should have been seen by 1991DaZT but was not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
1994Ju02's placement from 2970 level not supported by |g|g coin data of 1996Gi09; however, 2000Gr34 do report coin with primary |g feeding this level, so placement shown as uncertain here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from weighted average of (|G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0})=1.67 {I4} (1996Ma18), 1.72 {I5} (1991Zi01) and 1.70 {I7} (1976Me04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.087 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.013 {I13} (2000De59); P{-|g}=0.74 {I+8-10} (1998Be62). 
M,MR from 2000De59. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.046 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.047 {I20} (2000De59); P{-|g}=1.16 {I+13-11} (1998Be62). 
M,MR from 2000De59. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.084 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.031 {I15}, P{-|g}=1.29 {I+27-21} (1998Be62); authors assign mult=Q, inconsistent with |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI too large relative to I(1563|g) for all I|g to belong with this placement; possibly deexcites the 2337 and/or 2263 level also, as in Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI from I(741|g):I(821|g)=1.05 {I4}:1.0 (1972Do01). Other: 633:575 (1978Mc02). 
M from |g(|q). A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.42 {I7} (1972Do01); W(0|')/W(90|')=0.906 {I13} (1978Mc02). 
MR |d|<-25 (|g(|q), 1978Mc02); 1972Do01 report |d|>29. Large |d favors |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI see comments with 557|g and 741|g. 
M Q from W(0|')/W(90|')=1.418 {I18} (1978Mc02); direct Coulomb excitation of 821 level observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
I(731|g):I(915|g): 1.80 {I13}:1.0 (1972Do01). Other: 8.7:4.8 (1978Mc02). 
M,MR from |g(|q). A{-2}=-0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.56 {I10} (1972Do01); W(0|')/W(90|')=0.63 {I13} (1978Mc02). Large |d favors |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. E|g=547.1 {I5} (974Ke04,1977Ke06) is inconsistent with E(level) from 1990Ko30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E also reported by 1995Os05. 
B(E2)(2056 (4+{-|g|g}) to 821 (2+{-|g}))=0.060 {I13} (1998Ha38; systematic uncertainties included), 0.039 {I9} (1993Os05); weighted average is 0.050 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$The compiler got B(E2)(W.u.)=2.30 {I+12-15}. It is likely authors's value of 0.22 {I10} is mistakenly calculated for B(E1)(W.u.) in unit of mW.u. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=1.5 mW.u. {I2} is misplaced under B(E2) in 2022Le11 
E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy difference=789.29 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$The compiler got B(E2)(W.u.)<0.77 for |d=0.09 {I+15-12}. 
MR$or -1.9 {I+8-6} with B(E2)(W.u.)=9 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
I|g=33 for 64.6|g and 67.3|g combined (1966Fu09); evaluator estimates I|g(64.6|g)/I|g(67.3|g)|?5 from spectrum in 1971Ha42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$evaluator assumes I|g=202 in 1971Ha42 (table 2) to be a misprint of I|g=20.2 (see authors' figures 4 and 11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)|?0.94 (value required by intensity balance of 65.5|g-84|g cascade), compared with |a(E1 theory)=0.983. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
K/L=5.9 {I15}. 
M from restriction to E1 or M1 by K/L, and elimination of M1 by low I|g(Er K| x ray) (M1 for 149.5|g would require I|g(Er K| x ray)>800, compared with I|g(exp)=326). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 78.63 {I3} (n,n'|g), 78.65 {I8} ({+170}Ho |b{+-} decay (2.76 min)). 
M from |a(exp) in {+170}Ho |b{+-} decay (2.76 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR <-70 from Coulomb excitation but +17 {I+6-3} from (n,n'|g); discrepancy in signs not understood. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+170}Ho |b{+-} decay (2.76 min). Others: 21 {I3} in (n,n'|g), 3.5 {I3} in Coulomb Excitation. 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); |D|p=(no) from magnitude of |d. 
Other |d: +0.08 {I+4-3} or (1/|d)=-0.03 {I+4-3} in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M D+Q from (n,n'|g); E2(+M1) from Coulomb excitation. 
MR from (n,n'|g). However, |d|<-16 in Coulomb excitation. Source of discrepancy in sign not apparent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from Coulomb excitation. 
MR -1.29 {I+7-12} or -9.8 {I+22-63} in (n,n'|g), -4.3 {I+23-99} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 73 {I6} from Coulomb excitation, 86 {I12} from (n,n'|g). Other: 21 {I11} in {+170}Ho |b{+-} decay (2.76 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI from |b{+-} decay (2.76 min). 
M |D|p=(yes) from level scheme, but |d=-30 {I+7-13} in (n,n'|g) is unreasonably large for E1+M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 32 {I8} in (n,n'|g), 19 {I4} in {+170}Ho |b{+-} decay (2.76 min). 
MR 0.15 {I+7-6} or -30<|d<-1.6 in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from ({+238}U,{+238}U'|g). Other: 142.9 {I2} in ({+136}Xe,X|g). Absent in (n,n'|g). 
RI I|g/I(268|g)=0.45 {I6} from ({+136}Xe,X|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from ({+238}U,{+238}U'|g). Other: 266.8 {I2} in ({+136}Xe,X|g). Absent in (n,n'|g). 
RI from ({+136}Xe,X|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$the 2701|g which accompanies this |g in (n,n'|g) is stronger than the 2621|g so it should have been seen here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1969Ha20. 
RI$from weighted average of I|g(79)/I|g(84, Yb)=0.00122 {I24} (1970Mo07), 0.00150 {I20} (1985Me18), 0.00140 {I8} (1986Ve01). Other: 1969Ha20. 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1973Me17. 
Branching: from weighted average of |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=1.64 {I8} (1996Ma18), 1.63 {I7} (1976Me04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Branching: from weighted average of |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.60 {I14} (1996Ma18), 0.67 {I28} (1976Me04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI branching: from weighted average of |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.466 {I 28} (1996Ma18), 0.45 {I4} (1976Me04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 36 {I3} in 1981Bo40. 
A{-2}=+0.257 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I19}, P{-|g}=2.06 {I+62-20}. Others: A{-2}=-0.15 {I26}, A{-4}=-0.55 {I23} (1983Gr30). Doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
P{-|g}=0.98 {I21} (1992Be29); A{-2}=+0.09 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I12} (1983Gr30). Mult=E2 assigned by 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.223 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.062 {I23}, P{-|g}=1.3 {I+9-5}. 
Placement taken from 2000Gr14; 1992Be63 assigned a doubly-placed 370.99|g to deexcite the J=8 g.s. band member. 1992Be29 placed this 374|g from the 1385 level and deduced -0.90<|d(D,Q)<-0.75 for the implied J=2 to 3 transition (not consistent with observed A{-4}<0). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI 63 {I3} in 1981Bo40. 
Other |d: 1983Gr30. 
A{-2}=-0.018 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I8}, P{-|g}=0.67 {I13} (1992Be29). Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30. Alternative placement of line (1992Be63) rejected by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.198 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.028 {I10}, P{-|g}=2.7 {I+12-5} (1992Be29). Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30, for 934|g+932|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Other |d: -0.35|<|d|<-0.2 or +2.2|<|d|<+4.0 (1983Gr30) 
A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3}, P{-|g}=1.7 {I+5-3}. Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 15.3 {I20} in 1981Bo40. 
A{-2}=+0.212 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.071 {I15}, P{-|g}=2.7 {I+13-6}. Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30, for 960|g+957|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR from 2000De59; |d(D,Q)=+0.08 {I+4-3} or (1/|d)=-0.03 {I+4-3} (1992Be29). 
A{-2}=-0.129 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.031 {I9}, P{-|g}=0.82 {I17} (1992Be29); A{-2}=-0.125 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.028 {I9} (2000De59). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR from 2000De59; (1/|d)=-0.11 {I+11-6} in 1992Be29. Other: 1983Gr30. 
A{-2}=+0.050 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.067 {I9}, P{-|g}=0.96 {I+21-18}; A{-2}=+0.048 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.064 {I9} (2000De59). Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30, for 932|g+934|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Other |d: 1983Gr30. 
A{-2}=+0.015 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.096 {I10}, P{-|g}=0.76 {I+16-15}. Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR -1.29 {I+7-12} or -9.8 {I+22-63}. Other: 1983Gr30. 
A{-2}=-0.196 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.053 {I16}. Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR +0.27 {I+9-6} or +6.6 {I+40-23} (1992Be29). Other: 1983Gr30. 
RI 9.4 {I2} in 1981Bo40. 
A{-2}=-0.252 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.028 {I16}, P{-|g}=1.0 {I3}. Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d(D,Q)=0.00 {I10} (1992Be29). 
A{-2}=-0.019 {I6}, A{-4}=0.0, P{-|g}=1.03 {I+25-20}. Others: A{-2}=-0.16 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I9} (1983Gr30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR 1992Be29 eliminate small |d solution based on P{-|g}; however, large |d inconsistent with level scheme. Other: 0|>|d|>-0.2 or |d<-10 (1983Gr30), based on |g(|q) alone. 
A{-2}=-0.011 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.013 {I17}, P{-|g}=0.99 {I12}. Other |g(|q): 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI 15.1 {I8} in 1981Bo40. 
A{-2}=-0.181 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.013 {I10}, P{-|g}=1.2 {I3}. Other |g(|q), |d: 1983Gr30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI 8.1 {I7} in 1981Bo40. 
MR -0.014 {I+4-5} or -3.8 {I6} (1992Be29). 
A{-2}=-0.181 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.033 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Other |d: +0.4|<|d|<+10 (1983Gr30) 
A{-2}=-0.139 {I14}, A{-4}=0.000 {I15}, P{-|g}=1.7 {I+6-4}. Others: A{-2}=+0.30 {I27}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I22} (1983Gr30). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.014 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I3}, P{-|g}=1.7 {I+27-6} for doublet. |d(D,Q)=-12 {I+3-5} if J to J-1 transition (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4}, P{-|g}=0.6 {I+4-3}, |d(D,Q)=-0.02 {I+3-4} for doublet assuming J=3 to 2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.253 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3}, P{-|g}=1.5 {I+7-4}, |d(D,Q)=-0.06 {I+3-4} for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 7 {I2} in 1981Bo40. 
A{-2}=-0.253 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3}, P{-|g}=1.5 {I+7-4}, |d(D,Q)=-0.06 {I+3-4} for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I5}; A{-2} differs from that expected for E2 transition from level with short T{-1/2} (1992Be29). Also, sign of A{-4} is incorrect for a J to J-2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4}. 
|d=-0.40 {I+7-8} or (1/|d)=+0.004 {I+6-5} if J=2 to 2 transition (1992Be29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR +0.22 {I+8-5} or +9 {I+12-3}, -6.4<|d<-2.0 for J(1769 level)=3, 4, respectively (for doublet). 
A{-2}=-0.223 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I3}, P{-|g}=1.5 {I+12-6} for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|d(D,Q)=-0.1 {I3} (1992Be29); |d>>0 solution excluded based on mult(1825|g). 
A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E alternative placement from a 2159 level suggested in 1998GlZY, but comparable strength 941|g which also deexcites that level is not reported in (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Multiplet (1992Be63); however, based on adopted 2039 level branching, essentially all I|g belongs to this placement, unless the 2039.3|g is itself a multiplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E rounded value from Adopted Gammas. 
M |g from level excited primarily by E2-E2 multiple Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI other I|g: 1.7 from thick target yield (1978Mc02). 
B(E2)=0.0016 {I4} from <2+{-|g} M(E2) 4+{-g}> =+0.09 {I1} (2011Di07). 
M from 2011Di07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.0336 {I+17-16} from <2+{-|g} M(E2) 2+{-g}> =+0.41 {I1} (2011Di07). 
A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.51 {I7} (1972Do01). W(0|')/W(90|')=0.913 {I16} (1978Mc02). 
MR from 1978Mc02. Other: |d=-57 {I+41-}|@ (1972Do01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.0205 {I13} from <2+{-|g} M(E2) 0+{-g}> =+0.32 {I1} (2011Di07). 
RI weighted average of 92.6 {I34} (1972Do01) and 87.8 {I28} from (BE2|_ to g.s.)/(BE2|_ to 79 level)=0.566 {I18} (1983Hu01). Others: 84 (1978Mc02), 98 {I10} (2011Di07; for 934|g+932|g). 
W(0|')/W(90|')=1.42 {I2} (1978Mc02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from B(E2), half-life and conversion coefficient. 
B(E2)=0.73 {I13} from <2+ M(E2) 0+(891)> =+1.91 {I+16-18} (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 95 from 1978Mc02. 
M from 2011Di07. 
B(E2)=0.0097 {I+9-17} from <2+ M(E2) 4+{-g}> =+0.22 {I+1-2} (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
B(M1)=0.0020 {I4} from <2+ M(M1) 2+{-g}> =0.10 {I1}; sign not determined (2011Di07). 
B(E2)=0.0005 {I+8-4} from <2+ M(E2) 2+{-g}> =-0.05 {I3} (2011Di07). 
MR 0.37 {I26} deduced by evaluator from E2 and M1 matrix elements. 
W(0|')/W(90|')=1.41 {I16} (1978Mc02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 65 from 1978Mc02. 
W(0|')/W(90|')=1.35 {I20} (1978Mc02). 
B(E2)=0.0016 {I4} from <2+ M(E2) 0+{-g}> =+0.09 {I1} (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI for I(934|g)+I(932|g) doublet. 
B(E2)=0.037 {I+5-14} from <3+{-|g} M(E2) 2+{-g}> =-0.51 {I+11-3} (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI limit from 2011Di07; |g not evident in spectrum in fig.1 or level diagram in fig. 2 of 2011Di07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 840 from 1972Do01. 
MR -38 {I+22-}|@ (1972Do01). 
MR 2.67 {I+19-26} deduced in 2011Di07 from matrix element for 2+ (K=0) to 2+{-g} and equation 4-254 in Bohr and Mottelson's book on Nuclear structure, volume II. 
A{-2}=-0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.62 {I11} (1972Do01). 
B(E2)=0.102 {I+11-8} from <4+ M(E2) 4+{-g}> =-0.96 {I+4-5} (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 1021 from 1972Do01. 
A{-2}=+0.43 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.52 {I19} (1972Do01). 
B(E2)=0.0121 {I7} from <4+ M(E2) 2+{-g}> =+0.33 {I1} (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 863 from 1972Do01. 
B(E2)=0.00028 {I+132-24} from <4+{-|g} M(E2) 4+{-|g}> =-0.05 {I7} (2011Di07). 
A{-2}=-0.42 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.66 {I21} (1972Do01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.0022 {I3} from <4+{-|g} M(E2) 2+{-g}> =+0.14 {I1} (2011Di07). 
Other E|g: 1045 from 1972Do01. 
Other I|g: 88 {I10} from 1972Do01. 
A{-2}=+0.58 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.40 {I25} (1972Do01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 46 {I7} from table 1 of 2011Di07, but line may be contaminated by a {+181}Ta line, so I|g given here as upper limit (2011Di07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 706.3 {I4} (2007ChZX), presumably for a doublet, but not so indicated by 2007ChZX 
RI$other: 9 {I5} per 100 n captures (2007ChZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weak |g only from {+172}Ho decay, considered suspect by the evaluator since implied (M3) multipolarity is unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$2000GrZV proposed placement from a 2548.9, 8+ level, but no such level seen in the high-spin study by 2010Dr02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)<0.5 deduced from intensity balance at 1263 level, assuming mult=D,E2 for 138|g and 229|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=0.26 {I3} from delayed intensity balance. This implies |d(M2/E1)=0.11 {I+4-2}, higher than expected for the two-orbital change required by the proposed initial and final state configurations. Alternatively, |a(exp) may be high due to a possible issue with systematic uncertainties in the efficiency calibration. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=0.071~{I7} from intensity balance (1987McZZ). It is consistent with E1 implied by level spins, but does not rule out E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=0.89~{I26} (1984ChZS) and |a(exp)=0.80~{I7} (1987McZZ). |a(exp) values are deduced from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$From an intensity balance at the 114.4+x level, I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(542.6|g), which yields |a=2.2~{I4}. Theory values are 2.11 (M1) and 1.85 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From an intensity balance at the 1018.2+x level, I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(361.4|g)+ I(|g+ce)(1018.2|g), which yields |a=0.14~{I11}. Theory values are 0.111 (E1), 0.951 (M1), and 0.673 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$From an intensity balance at the 1169.6+x level, I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(151.5|g)+ I(|g+ce)(1169.6|g)-I(|g+ce)(764.9|g), which yields |a=0.23~{I12}, consistent only with M1 or E2, with |a=0.279 and 0.152, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$From the requirement of an intensity balance at the 2345.1+x level, I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(106.5|g)=9.0~{I13}. From an intensity balance at the 2272.1+x level, I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce)(337.4|g)-I(|g+ce)(179.5|g)=5.0~{I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$An intensity balance at the 2272.1+x level, given mult(337.4|g)=E2, requires mult=E1 for both the 106.5|g and the 179.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$An intensity balance at the 2451.4+x level, using I(|g+ce)(106.5|g)+I(|g+ce)(179.5|g)=I(|g+ce)(337.4|g), gives |a=3.0~{I4}. Theory values are 2.81 and 2.69 for M1 and E2, respectively. The proposed level scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. This |g ray was not observed directly, due to the high electron conversion, but it was required by the coincidence relationship 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a{-T}(exp)=0.064 {I200} reported in 2018Na20 from intensity balance considerations. The quoted large uncertainty is probably a typo; most likely it is 0.020. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a{-T}(exp)=5.5 {I10} from intensity balance considerations 
BE2W$0.88 {I3} (by the compilers) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a{-T}(exp)=1.9 {I3} from intensity balance considerations implies M1 or/and E2 multipolarity. The authors assume Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a{-T}(exp)=0.77 {I24} from intensity balance considerations implies M2 or E3 multipolarity and hence one may expect longer lifetime to this level (by compilers). The authors assume Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a{-T}(exp)=0.88 {I73} from intensity balance considerations implies M2, E3 or M3 multipolarity and hence one may expect longer lifetime to this level (by compilers). The authors assume Mult=E3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a{-T}(exp)=3.8 {I9} from intensity balance considerations would imply M2 or E2 multipolarity and hence one may expect longer lifetime to this level (by compilers). The authors assume E1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.29 {I6} from relative intensities of K xrays and 115|g 
MR$derived by 2019Pa27 based on |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$for 578.2+577.1; 578.2|g component is much stronger than 577.1 
RI$75 (catcher foil spectrum) for composite line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$for 679.6+678.1; 679.6|g component is much stronger than 577.1 
RI$49 (catcher foil spectrum) for composite line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$23 (catcher foil spectrum) 
M$M1+E2 based on |a(K)exp contradicts |DJ=2 transition from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K/L=2.0 {I4} 
E The ordering of the 166.9-765.5-212.0 cascade is tentative due to similar intensities of the |g rays involved, thus the intermediate levels at 5208.8+x and 5974.2+x may be at different energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$50 (catcher foil spectrum); line also in {+153}Er 
RI Composite peak 
E The ordering of the 166.9-765.5-212.0 cascade is tentative due to similar intensities of the |g rays involved, thus the intermediate levels at 5208.8+x and 5974.2+x may be at different energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E,M$from {+144}Sm({+16}O,p4n|g) (2018Li19); {+144}Sm({+14}N,3n|g) (2007Ra21) give 908.2 {I5} |g, also (M1+E2) 
RI$from {+144}Sm({+16}O,p4n|g) (2018Li19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M From the measured and calculated K x-ray intensities and lack of L x rays in the {+156}Yb |e decay (1982To14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1983Ml01. 1999KaZV report E|g=115.3. 
RI$Listed uncertainty is that assumed by the evaluator. 
M From measured and calculated K x-ray intensities and lack of L x rays (1982To14). |a(K)exp=0.20 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I{-|g} values are from coincidences with this gate, so there is no value for this |g. 
M DCO=0.99 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From measured |a(K)exp = I{-Kx}/I{-|g} = 1.5 {I5} (1976Gi15) with estimated contribution to I{-Kx} from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Placement from 1989Ri01; 1989An04 place |g of this energy from a level of 8430 keV to the 33+ level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Value computed neglecting the contribution of the 125.9 |g. Including this will tend to reduce it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Value computed neglecting contributions from the 154.3 and 280.5 |g's. Including these may reduce it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 1983Ho10, where placement is questionable, but also reported by 1984La11 and 1985An09 with this placement. 
RI$Not seen by 1985Ho04, but intensity limit given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$value given with two decimals but with no unc in (HI,xn|g) dataset (2008Lu17 and 2008Su08). Because of missing information it is not clear how this transition was measured, reason for which its existence is questioned by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from adopted gammas. It is given with with two decimals but with no unc in (HI,xn|g) dataset (2008Lu17 and 2008Su08). Because of missing information it is not clear how this transition was measured, reason for which its existence is questioned by evaluator. Previously 28 {I20} was computed by 2005Re18 from the level-energy difference of parent level at 70 {I20} and the daughter level at 42. 
M from the level scheme, this transition can be either E3 or M3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$based on |a deduced from intensity balance at 42 level and relative ce intensity ratios L1:L2:L3=33:31:30 (1978Ad03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference 
M,MR,RI 1978Ad03 have deduced I(|g+ce)|?40 based upon analysis of their coincidence results. From this and their measured I(ce(L1)) they deduced an E2 component of |>30%. 
$I{-ce(L1)}<3 (1978Ad03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$value given with two decimals but with no unc by 2008Lu17 and 2008Su08. Because of missing information it is not clear how this transition was measured, reason for which its existence is questioned by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=2, Q transition quoted by 2008Su08 as obtained by DCO (with no evidence) and intensity balance ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$ E|g deviates by >3|s from the fit giving reduced |h{+2}=1.8, compared to critical |h{+2}=1.6. Uncertainty of 1 keV is assigned which gives |h{+2}=1.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
CC Value computed for |d=1. Note that the minimum value is |a=124, the value for a pure M1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E placement is that proposed by 1984Fo04, from {+152}Sm({+14}N,5n|g). |g is observed, but unplaced, by 1981Ad02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.29 {i1}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(176.6|g)=17.1 {i7} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.85 {i5}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(347.9|g)=24.1 {i11} is computed. This is the value listed here. 1995Sm02 do not list an I|g value for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.347 {i5}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(268.3|g)=34.7 {i5} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.43 {i21}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(395.5|g)=19 {i3} is computed. This is the value listed here. 1995Sm02 do not list an I|g value for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.84 {i3}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(322.6|g)=56 {i3} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.74 {i18}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(440.6|g)=72 {i5} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.77 {i4}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(398.1|g)=56 {i8} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.76 {i34}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(431.0|g)=95 {i19} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (5.00 {i25}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(479.4|g)=33 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (5.28 {i17}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(516.6|g)=64 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.40 {i4}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(494.5|g)=94 {i5} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 1995Sm02 do not list an I|g value for this placement. From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.13 {i13}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(517.1|g)=143 {i12} is computed. This is the value listed here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (3.05 {i13}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(544.9|g)=45 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.41 {i8}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(563.9|g)=54 {i4} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (7.09 {i38}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(571.7|g)=35 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (3.20 {i42}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(583.4|g)=70 {i10} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (10.76 {i118}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(590.6|g)=84 {i9} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.25 {i13}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(601.3|g)=32 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.05 {i12}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(607.0|g)=49 {i4} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.82 {i20}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(627.6|g)=48 {i4} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (5.93 {i89}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(614|g)=23 {i4} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.44 {i3}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(570.0|g)=40 {i3} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (|>7.77, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(632|g)|>22 is computed. This is the value listed here. 1995Sm02 do not list an I|g value for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.65 {i13}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(518.4|g)=38 {i8} is computed. This is the value listed here. 1995Sm02 do not list an I|g value for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E From 1984Fo04, {+152}Sm({+14}N,5n|g). Reported as 642 on the level scheme of 1995Sm02, but that value is not consistent with their reported level energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (8.90 {i107}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(655|g)=25 {i4} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.66 {i5}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(425.9|g)=40 {i4} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.59 {i5}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(484.3|g)=24 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (7.78 {i118}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(669|g)=17 {i3} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (0.92 {i3}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(536.2|g)=32 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.09 {i9}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(590.6|g)=31 {i3} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.19 {i13}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(643.9|g)=27 {i3} is computed. This is the value listed here. 1995Sm02 do not list an I|g value for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.1 {i2}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(686.8|g)=25 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (2.7 {i8}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(738.1|g)=15 {i5} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the directly measured |DJ=2/|DJ=1 |g branching (1.6 {i2}, 1995Sm02) of this level, I|g(771.9|g)=12 {i2} is computed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I7}; A{-4}=0.00 {I9}. (Values for both the 139.9 and 140.2 |g's.) 
RI peak contains two |g's. The listed I|g value is for the pair. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.02 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I6}. (Values for both the 188.3 and 189.0 |g's.) 
M ce data suggest E1 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.26 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.12 {I2}. (Values are for both the 516.6 and 517.1 |g's.) 
RI peak contains two |g's. The listed I|g value is for the pair. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
From 1995Sm02. 1984Fo04 report a 357.1 |g, but indicate that it is contaminated by a |g from {+162}Tm. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g) 
RI in {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g), 1987Dr07 report I|g(48.50|g)=380 {I50}, relative to I|g(73.87|g)=100 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 22.0 {I22} (1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g)) and 15.0 {I7} (1998Es06, {+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 46 {I5} (1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g)) and 42 {I3} (1998Es06, {+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1998Es06 ({+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). In {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g), 1987Dr07 report I|g=24.1 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 53 {I4} (1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g)) and 58.1 {I23} (1998Es06, {+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 94 {I10} (1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g)) and 89 {I4} (1998Es06, {+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 48 {I6} (1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g)) and 51.3 {I24} (1998Es06, {+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 41 {I5} (1987Dr07, {+152}Sm({+14}N,4n|g)) and 37 {I3} (1998Es06, {+130}Te({+37}Cl,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from 1987Dr07. 
RI 1987Dr07 report I|g(48.50|g)=380 {I50}, relative to I|g(73.87|g)=100 {I10}. (1987Dr07 report E|g=74.56 {I7} for the |g that 1998Es06 call 73.87) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.16 {I6}, A{-4}=0.2 {I1} 
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(115.55|g)=50 {I3} and I|g(67.95|g)/I|g(116.45|g)=1.35 {I21}, from 1987Dr07. (the latter two E|g values are those reported by 1987Dr07 and differ somewhat from those of 1998Es06.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$the |g-ray branching ratios are from {+165}Ho({+3}He,5n|g),(|a,6n|g); I|g(146.6)/I|g(262.3)=0.3/78 in {+130}Te({+37}Cl,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g from ce data. I|g from I(|g+ce) and |a 
$|a(M1):|a(M2):|a(M3)=0.010:0.70:1.00 
M$from M1<<M2|?M3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. |g expected from |g|g coin 
$I(|g+ce) from |g|g coin. I|g from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M$no E2 or M2 allowed by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.12 {I23}, K:L1:L2=6.4:1:|<0.24 
EKC$11.2 quoted by 1975Ad09 seems a misprint. It is assumed as 1.12 (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. Unresolved doublet at 312.62 
CC assuming |D|d=50% 
$|a(K)exp|?0.06 
RI$from |g|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I8} 
TI$I|g(1+|a)=380 {I40} not consistent with I(|g+ce)|>630 {I70} from |SI|g(1+|a) feeding state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from branching ratios in adopted gammas and I|g(144|g). I|g<42 for a composite line in ({+3}He,5n|g) 
$A{-2}=-0.05 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
TI$|>285 from total intensity feeding 23.2 level 
M$not E1 from |a(exp) deduced from I(|g+ce) and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=136 {I14} divided, based on branching in adopted gammas 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g(t) (1977RoYU) indicate a doublet consisting of a prompt component and an |?8.5 ns component 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0069 {I7} (2013Bl07) 
$|a(K)exp: from 20m spectra. Others: 0.0067 {I7} (1m), 0.0067 {I15} (1m20), 0.0080 {I9} (20m1). 
M,MR$other: compiler obtains M1+E2 with |d=0.7 {I3} based on |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1987Dr07 only. It is assumed that the 109, 3+ level of 1999Re05 corresponds to the 108.8+Z' level of 1987Dr07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$deduced by evaluators from L1/L2/L3=247 {I30}/34 {I4}/17 {I4}. 1982AdZZ give M1+0.35% {i10} E2 (implying |d=0.059 {i8}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from L1/L2/L3=90 {I10}/47 {I5}/64 {I7}. |d(M2/E1)<0.018 from L-subshell ratios. Note that these ratios also give M1+E2 with |d=0.23 {I2}, but the fit is somewhat poor with reduced |h{+2}=2.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$from 1997ZaZW. Other: <0.19 from |a(K)exp 
$|d(M2/E1)=0.39 5 from EKC 
$L1/L2=6 {I2}/|?0.5 
ICE: CEK=44 8, CEL1=6 2, CEL2 AP 0.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.60 16 from EKC 
$L1/L2=0.7 {I1}/|?0.05 
ICE: CEK=4.4 3 (SI(LI)), CEK=5.2 6, CEL1=0.7 1, CEL2 AP 0.05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.62 8 from EKC 
$L1/L2=0.9 {I1}/|?0.06 
ICE: CEK=5.2 3 (SI(LI)), CEK=6.3 8, CEL1=0.9 1, CEL2=0.06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.36 4 from EKC 
$L1/L2/L3=0.20 {I3}/0.10 {I3}/|?0.05 
ICE: CEK=1.6 2, CEL1=0.20 3, CEL2=0.10 3, CEL3 AP 0.05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.64 13 from EKC 
$K/L1=0.7 {I1}/0.09 {I2} 
ICE: CEK=0.86 9 (SI(LI)), CEK=0.7 1, CEL1=0.09 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.54 11 from EKC 
$K/L=1.0 {I2}/0.15 {I5} 
ICE: CEK=1.22 16 (SI(LI)), CEK=1.0 2, CEL=0.15 5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.70 13 from EKC 
$K/L=1.9 {I3}/0.3 {I1} 
ICE: CEK=2.2 1 (SI(LI)), CEK=1.9 3, CEL=0.3 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.40 12 from EKC 
M,MR$from 1997ZaZW. |a(K)exp and L1/L2 give |d(E2/M1)=0.26 {I+18-12} 
$L1/L2=2.0 {I5}/0.3 {I1} 
ICE: CEK=14 3, CEL1=2.0 5, CEL2=0.3 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from 1997ZaZW. Note that |a(K)exp=0.04 {I2} in 1982AdZZ is too high for M1, E2 or M2, thus the authors proposed mult=E0+E2 
ICE: CEK=1.26 11, CEK=0.9 3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)|<0.3 from ce data in {+165}Yb decay gives B(E2)(W.u.)<20510, much higher than RUL=1000 which gives |d(E2/M1)<0.06, which is adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in ({+11}B,4n|g) and DCO in ({+15}N,4n|g); E2 or M1+E2 from ce data in {+165}Yb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 130.26 {I7} from {+165}Yb |e decay, 130.0 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 130.0 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 130.2 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from DCO in ({+15}N,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 111.4 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g) and 111.8 {I2} from (|a,4n|g). Other: 111.9 {I10} from ({+11}B,4n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from DCO in ({+15}N,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+11}B,4n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
RI$others: 10.2 {I21} from ({+11}B,4n|g), 5.8 {I10} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 134.60 {I8} from {+165}Yb |e decay, 134.4 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 134.4 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 134.6 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from DCO in ({+15}N,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+11}B,4n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$from {+165}Yb |e decay. Others: 100 {I7} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 100 {I20} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 100 {I29} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 67 {I4} from {+165}Yb |e decay, 71 {I5} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 55 {I6} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 65 {I10} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 155.2 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 155.5 {I5} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 155.6 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$Others: 67 {I6} from ({+11}B,4n|g) and 111 {I11} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 285.3 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 285.9 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 285.8 {I2} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I9} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 100 {I15} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 116.1 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 116.6 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 116.7 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g). Other: 100 {I13} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 208.0 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g) and 208.8 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g). Other: 16 {I5} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 119.9 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 120.6 {I10} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 120.4 {I2} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 15.1 {I12} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 22 {I4} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 29 {I4} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 255.00 {I10} from {+165}Yb |e decay, 254.6 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 255.0 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 255.0 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g). Others: 100 {I11} from ({+11}B,4n|g) and 100 {I8} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 320.68 {I8} from {+165}Yb |e decay and 319.9 {I3} from ({+15}N,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 83.9 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g) and 84.2 {I1} from (|a,4n|g). Other: 84.5 {I10} from ({+11}B,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 16.4 {I7} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 20 {I4} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 14.6 {I15} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 204.0 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 204.1 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 204.4 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g). Others: 100 {I20} from ({+11}B,4n|g) and 100 {I12} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from DCO in ({+15}N,4n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+11}B,4n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 142.2 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 142.0 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 142.5 {I1} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g). Others: 100 {I10} from ({+11}B,4n|g) and 100 {I7} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 258.7 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 259.1 {I5} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 259.1 {I2} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 32.4 {I20} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 31.9 {I29} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 19.5 {I27} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from DCO in ({+15}N,4n|g) ; |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,4n|g). Others: 163.9 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g) and 164.4 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+15}N,4n|g). Others: 100 {I11} from ({+11}B,4n|g) and 100 {I12} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 306.3 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 306.6 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 306.6 {I2} from (|a,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 59.3 {I24} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 58 {I6} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 56 {I7} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 403.1 {I10} from ({+11}B,4n|g) and 403.7 {I5} from (|a,4n|g). |g not in ({+15}N,4n|g) 
RI$from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 355.0 {I2} from ({+15}N,4n|g), 355.0 {I3} from ({+11}B,4n|g), and 355.2 {I2} from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=1011.60 
M$DCO seems to indicate D, |DJ=2 but it is inconsistent with E2, |DJ=2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity=54 {I6}. 1973Ta18 estimate that |?10 units belong to the other placement, based on {+165}Yb |e decay 
$I|g=53 {I5} for doublet at E({+11}B)=60 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity for 203.4+204.1=160 {I16}. From {+165}Yb |e decay, 1973Ta18 estimate that the two components are of about equal intensity 
$I|g=239 {I24} for 203.4+204.1 at E({+11}B)=60 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$see comment for 203.4|g 
$|g(|q) for 204.4|g+203.2|g 
$I|g=239 {I24} for 204.4+203.2 at E({+11}B)=60 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
TI$from transition intensity balance 
M$from M1:M2:M3=|?860:|<200:|<200 (1978Ad06). 
MR$|d(E2/M1)|<0.3 from ce data in {+165}Yb decay gives B(E2)(W.u.)<20510, much higher than RUL=1000 which gives |d(E2/M1)<0.06, which is adopted here 
$Ice(M1)|?860, Ice(M2)|<200, Ice(M3)|<200 (1978Ad06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from K:L1:L2:L3=|?400:|<70:770:800 (1978Ad06). Others: L2/L3|?0.91 (1967Pa04), |a(L)exp=7.6 {I20} (1968Ta05) 
$Ice(K)|?400, Ice(L1)|<70, Ice(L2)=770, Ice(L3)=800 (1978Ad06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=1.42 with uncertainty of 0.50 assumed by evaluators. Others: K:L1:L2=|?1600:180:|?40 (1978Ad06). K/L|?5.5, |a(K)exp|?0.88 (1967Pa04) 
$Ice(K)|?1600, Ice(L1)=180, Ice(L2)|?40 (1978Ad06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)(52.10|g+22.78|g)|?4 (1978Ad06) based on |g|g-coin data. Evaluators divide equally between the two transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=9 {I3} from intensity balance in ({+11}B,5n|g) (2002Ca46). 
Placement from ({+11}B,5n|g); placement feeding 109+x level in (|a,3n|g) not confirmed in ({+11}B,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)|<1.5 (2002Ca46) in ({+11}B,5n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g). 
RI from (|a,3n|g). Other: 72 from ({+11}B,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI from (|a,3n|g). Other I(122|g):I(59|g)=45 {I15}:100 {I16} in (11b5ng). 
M from ce data in (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI from (|a,3n|g). Other: 64 from ({+11}B,5n|g). 
M |D|p=yes from |a(K)exp in (|a,3n|g); D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) and DCO ratio in ({+11}B,5n|g). However, level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from (|a,3n|g). Other: 98 from ({+11}B,5n|g). 
MR weighted average of +0.23 {I8} from DCO in ({+11}B,5n|g), +0.44 {I4} from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement from ({+11}B,5n|g); see comment on the 478.99 {I11} transition in (|a,3n|g) source data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=4.2 {I+3-2} (1963Ja06); K:L=580 {I50}:100 (1959Br17), K:L12:L3:M=630 {I200}:100:1.1 {I2}:14 {I2} (1959Gr06). 
E from 1973De22. Others: 82.3 {I1} (1961Gr33); 82.0 {I1} (1963Pa08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from 1996Dr07. 
Other I|g: I(41.29|g):I(74.92|g)=6.7 {I9}:17.8 {I9} in 1996Dr07. 
M,MR from intensity balance at the 74.9+x level (1996Dr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E from 1996Dr07; 62.2 {I1} in 2002Ca46. 
M from |a(K)exp=1.21 {I24} (1996Dr07) from I(K| x ray) in coincidence with 62|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E from 1996Dr07. Other E|g: 59.3 {I3} (2002Ca46). 
M |a(K)exp=1.18 {I24} (1996Dr07) from I(K| x ray) in coincidence with 59|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from 1996Dr07. Other E|g: 121.5 {I3} (2002Ca46). 
RI I(121.71|g):I(59.488|g)=7.5 {I25}:16.5 {I26} (1996Dr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from e-mail reply (of May 12, 2003) from one of the authors (M.A. Cardona). The E|g=325.7 in Table I and fig. 1 of 2002Ca46 is a typographical error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp=5.7 {I4}, |a(N+...)exp=0.45 {I6} (1995Ma07). 
Transition has both prompt and delayed components. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The evaluator has reversed the order of the 86.9|g and 120.29|g in order to achieve consistency with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placed here as a |g linking to a different band; however, in Adopted Levels, Gammas, this is an intraband transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from (|a,3n|g) experiment of 1995Ma07, but data reported only in conjunction with data from a different reaction in 1996Dr07. Placement from 1996Dr07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.43 {I20} (1995Ma07); A{-2}=+0.41 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I4} (1992Dr03). A{-4}=+0.09 {I40} in 1995Ma07 is presumably a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from (|a,3n|g) experiment of 1995Ma07 but data reported only in conjunction with data from a different experiment in 1996Dr07. Placement from 1996Dr07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 106.16 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 106.18 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), and 106.25 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Others: 100 {I9} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 116.57 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 116.69 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), and 116.77 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Others: 12.6 {I13} from (|a,2n|g); 39.2 {I26} from (p,n|g) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Other: 25.80 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.6 {I5} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 2.0 {I10} from (p,n|g). 
$|a=29.4 {I+23-14} for a 50% uncertainty in |d. 
$50% uncertainty assumed for |d when calculating B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 131.99 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 132.05 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 132.12 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Others: 100 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$161.45 {I6} with I|g=244 {I19} from (p,n|g) for a triplet; 161.25 with I|g=100 {I46} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 171.75 {I8} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 171.76 {I5} from (|a,2n|g), and 171.80 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100 {I28} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 100 {I18} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 177.22 {I3} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 177.27 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 177.33 {I6} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 98.24 {I3} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 98.30 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 3.9 {I4} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 3.20 {I29} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 9.1 {I31} from (p,n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$others: 143.46 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 143.53 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Others: 100 {I4} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g masked by neighboring intense |g rays in {+167}Yb |e decay 
RI$from I|g(280.55|g) and adopted I(103.32|g)/I(280.5|g)=2.9 {I10} in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 174.25 {I7} from (|a,2n|g) and 174.27 {I7} from (p,n|g). |g masked by neighboring intense |g rays in {+167}Yb |e decay 
RI$from I|g(280.55|g) and adopted I(174.26|g)/I(280.5|g)=2.04 {I63}, taken from average of values in (|a,2n|g) and (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 280.5 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 280.60 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay, 35 {I11} from (|a,2n|g), and 13 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 290.86 {I7} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 291.02 {I9} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. No intensity is reported in (|a,2n|g). Most intense |g in (p,n|g) for an unresolved doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. 
$I(|g+ce)=4.96 {I15} from intensity balance from {+167}Yb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 113.32 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 113.41 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Others: 100 {I9} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
$Small reduced transition probability attributed to pairing effects (1968Ta05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 176.23 {I3} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 176.34 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 30.7 {I11} from (|a,2n|g) and 28.2 {I22} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 116.66 {I3} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 116.69 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), and 116.77 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 184.1 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 184.01 {I15} from (|a,2n|g), and 184.17 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I57} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 100 {I5} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 209.92 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 210.01 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 44.6 {I12} from (|a,2n|g) and 47 {I4} from (p,n|g). Other: 43 {I29} from {+167}Yb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 85.10 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 85.21 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
M$D from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); (E1) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 90.83 {I6} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 90.84 {I1} from (|a,2n|g), and 90.91 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
M$also supported by |g(|q) from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 139.83 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 139.91 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); M1 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 256.67 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 77.3 {I15} from (|a,2n|g) and 86 {I9} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$weak |g from (|a,2n|g). In (p,n|g) a 343.28 {I15} |g is an unresolved doublet, placed from 460 and 779 levels. See comment for 342.95|g from 779 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 99.25 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38.2 {I30} from (|a,2n|g) and 46 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
M$D also from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 184.33 {I4} from (|a,2n|g) and 184.51 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I10} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 460.36 {I9} from {+167}Yb |e decay, 460.77 {I3} from (|a,2n|g), and 460.32 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 470.65 {I9} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 470.40 {I25} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. 
$level-energy difference=471.02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 112.88 {I4} from (|a,2n|g) and 112.95 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I8} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 203.75 {I4} from (|a,2n|g) and 204.00 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 11.1 {I6} from (|a,2n|g) and 14.7 {I26} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 379.9 {I3} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 379.60 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 415.4 {I2} from {+167}Yb |e decay and 415.60 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+167}Yb |e decay. Other: 53 {I7} from (p,n|g) for a doublet 
M$from ce data for a doublet in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 441.22 {I3} with I|g=100 {I8} from (|a,2n|g) and 440.92 {I15} with I|g=70 {I9} from (p,n|g), for a doublet 
M$from ce data for a doublet in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 547.43 {I3} with I|g=100 {I11} from (|a,2n|g), and 547.20 {I20} with I|g=100 {I9} from (p,n|g), for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 251.03 {I1} with I|g=85 {I8} from (|a,2n|g) for a doublet 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); M1 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 295.67 {I9}, I|g=100 {I11} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$for a doublet in (|a,2n|g); Mult=M1 for a single line in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 135.20 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 135.27 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 247.98 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 25.7 {I11} from (|a,2n|g) and 41 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 330.99 {I9} from (|a,2n|g) and 331.43 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I24} from (p,n|g) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 218.77 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 25.1 {I6} from (|a,2n|g) and 23.9 {I25} from (p,n|g) 
M$D also from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (p,n|g); for double placement, other from 371 level. Other E|g=228.92 from (|a,2n|g). Uncertainty doubled in the fitting of level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 372.43 {I15} with I|g=183 {I11} from (p,n|g) probably for a doublet with 372.96|g from 1161 level seen in (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce data in (p,n|g) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 413.39 {I12} from (|a,2n|g) and 413.50 {I25} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I14} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 271.12 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 271.26 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
M$(E2) also from ce data in (p,n|g) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=181.47 {I8} and I|g in (p,n|g) are not reliable as the peak is contaminated by other |g rays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) for a doublet. Other: 343.28 {I15} from (p,n|g) for a doublet placed from 460 and 779 levels. From data in (|a,2n|g), main placement of this |g is from 779 and a minor placement from 1430 level, while a weak 343.37|g is placed from 460 level. 
M$for a doublet in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 156.03 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 156.11 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I9} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 291.02 {I9} with I|g=202 {I22} from (p,n|g) for a doublet 
M$for a multiplet in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 664.79 {I20} from (p,n|g); doublet in both 
RI$263 {I13} for a doublet in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 381.01 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 380.60 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I12} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,M$for a doublet. Other: 371.26 {I30} from (p,n|g) for a doublet 
RI$from ({+7}Li,4n|g). Doublet in (|a,2n|g), where intensity is divided in two placements, based on branching ratio in ({+7}Li,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$from ({+7}Li,4n|g). Other: 27.4 {I8} in (|a,2n|g) is in disagreement 
M$D from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 397.38 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) and 397.57 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
M$(E2) also from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 371.26 {I30} from (p,n|g) for a doublet. Uncertainty doubled in the fitting of level scheme 
$level-energy difference=373.156 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g is for a doublet in (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,4n|g). Other: I|g is a doublet in (|a,2ng), I|g(480.5)/I|g(252.8)=0.82 {I20} versus 4.86 {I51} in ({+7}Li,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g not reported in ({+7}Li,4n|g). I|g(493)/I|g(498)=1.5 {I2}/4.2 {I3} in (|a,2n|g), 498|g is doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from ({+7}Li,4n|g). Other: 100 {I7} for a doublet in (|a,2n|g) 
M$Q for a doublet from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 10.45 {I5} (1993AbZZ), 10.41 {I3} (116.57 {I2}-106.16 {I2}), 10.43 {I11} (171.75 {I8}-161.32 {I8}) 10.3 {I3} (272.1 {I2}-282.4 {I2}), and 10.36 {I21} (290.86 {I7}- 280.5 {I2}). Differences of the same |g-ray energies in (|a,2n|g) and (p,n|g) cannot be used as for each set one |g ray is a doublet. The same value is recommended in the Adopted Gammas 
$Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=43 {I5}:14 {I2}:21 {I3} (1993AbZZ,1981AbZR) 
M,MR$from M-subshell ratios. The same value is recommended in the Adopted Gammas 
RI$from |a and I(|g+ce)=442 {I19} (deduced from transition intensity balance at the 10.4 level), assuming no |e+|b{++} feeding to this level 
$Thanks to Tibor Kibedi (ANU) who provided (Aug 15, 2021) calculated total theoretical conversion coefficients for L-, M-, N-, O- and P-shells, as well as subshells using "BrIccRaine" computer code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=106.14 {I5}, I|g=197 (1971GoYX) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=240:40:4.2:1.5:6.6:0.86:0.33:0.33 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=37 {I7}:2.5 {I5}/1 (1965Gr20) 
MR$deduced from L-subshell ratio in 1965Gr20. Other: 0.3 from sub-shell ratios in 1971Fu10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=116.55 {I5}, I|g=23.3 (1971GoYX) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=9.7 {I10}:0.86 {I9}:4.3 {I5}:4.3 {I5} (1993AbZZ, same values but without uncertainties in 1971Fu10) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=9.7:0.86:4.3:4.3:0.14:0.75:0.31 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=1:5.5 {I10}: 5 {I1} (1965Gr20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$E|g=25.90 {I10} (1971GoYX) 
$L1:L2:L3=|?0.2:|?0.2:|?0.5 (1971Fu10) 
$|a=29.4 {I+23-14} for a 50% uncertainty in |d. 
RI$from I(|g+ce)=6.6 {I20} deduced from I(|g+ce)(132.0|g)=28.7 {I8} and I(|g+ce)(25.8|g)/I(|g+ce)(132.0|g)=0.23 {I7} (1971Fu10, from |g|g coin), assuming |a=29.4. 
M,MR$reported in 1981AbZR with no experimental details given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=132.01 {I5}, I|g=19.8 (1971GoYX) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=6.5 {I8}:0.65 {I8}:2.0 {I3}:1.9 {I3} (1993AbZZ, same values but without uncertainties in 1971Fu10) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=6.5:0.65:2.0:1.9:0.32:0.33 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=1:5.0 {I10}:3.5 {I5} (1965Gr20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.12 {I3} (1993AbZZ) 
$1993AbZZ assigned E1 suggesting that quoted I(ce) is high by an order of magnitude. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=37.03 {I5} (1971GoYX) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.00:1.43 {I6}:1.64 {I5} (1987BaZB) 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=2.5:3.5:4.0:1.0:1.1:1.2:0.4 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=1:1.15 {I10}:1.03 (1965Gr20) 
RI$I(|g+ce)(37|g)=29 {I10} from I(|g+ce)(62.9|g)=317 {I54} and I(|g+ce)(37.0|g)/I(|g+ce)(62.9|g)=0.09 {I3} (1971Fu10, from |g|g-coin). Other: I|g(exp)=0.5 {I2} (in Table 1 of 1971Fu10) 
MR$deduced by evaluators from L-subshell data in 1987BaZB. Others: |d=0.283 {I15} from L-subshell data in 1965Gr20, assuming 25% uncertainty in L3/L1; 0.32 {I8} with L-subshell ratios from 1987BaZB and 1965Gr20, but the fit is somewhat poor. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=62.88 {I5}, I|g=21.7 (1971GoYX) 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=40:4.6:1.9:11:2.4:0.2:2.9 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=26 {i3}:3.6 {i4}:1 (1965Gr20) 
MR$deduced from L-subshell ratio in 1965Gr20. Other: 0.15 from sub-shell ratios in 1971Fu10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)/Ice(L1)=0.4 {I1}:0.05 {I2} (1993AbZZ) 
M$not M2 from K/L1 
RI,TI$from Ice(K)=0.4 {I1} (1993AbZZ), assuming mult=D,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas, |g masked by neighboring intense lines in {+167}Yb |e decay in 1971Fu10 
RI$from I|g(280.5|g) and adopted I(103.32|g)/I(280.5|g)=2.9 {I10} taken from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas, |g masked by neighboring intense |g rays in 1971Fu10 
RI$from I|g(280.5|g) and adopted I(174.25|g)/I(280.5|g)=2.04 {I63}, taken from average value of (|a,2n|g) and (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$this transition is expected from the observed values of I|g(143.5|g) in prompt and delayed (x ray)|g-coin data 
E$from energy difference between 293 and 286 levels. 
TI$from intensity balance at 286 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=113.30 {I5}, I|g=450 (1971GoYX) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=69:8.7:1.2:1.3:1.6:0.19:0.21:0.5 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.244 {I12}:0.270 {I15} (1987BaZB) 
$L1:L2:L3=7.4 {I20}:1:1 (1965Gr20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=176.31 {I10}, I|g=100 (1971GoYX) 
$Ice(K)=3.6 (1971Fu10) 
$L1:L2:L3=4.0 {I10}:1.3:1 (1965Gr20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: E|g=116.6 {I1} (1971Fu10). 
$Ice(K)/Ice(L1)=0.5 {I1}/|?0.08 (1993AbZZ) 
RI$from |a and I(|g+ce), the latter from intensity balance at 296 level, assuming no |e+|b{++} branch to that level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=460.4 {I4}, I|g=0.151 (1971GoYX, unplaced). 
$Ice(K)|?0.005 (1993AbZZ) 
M$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=470.6 {I2}, I|g=0.095 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced) 
$Ice(K)|?0.004 (1993AbZZ) 
M$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M,MR$from the Adopted Gammas. This |g not resolved from 113.32|g in {+167}Yb |e decay. 
RI$from |a and I(|g+ce)=0.017 {I17} from intensity balance at 497 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty increased to 0.05 keV in least-squares fit procedure 
RI$deduced from I|g(106.2|g) and adopted I(106|g):I(117|g)=100 {I5}:12.5 {I3} from 117 level. 
$E|g=116.6 {I2}, I|g=44 {I15} (1970Wi09, doublet) 
$E2 in 1980Ol05 and 1970Wi09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas 
RI$deduced from I|g(132.0|g) and adopted I(26|g):I(132|g)=1.6 {I5}:100 {I3} from 143 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas 
RI$from I(174|g) (1980Ol05) and I(281|g):I(174|g)=1.8 {I5}:3.7 {I4} (1976Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=7 {I3} is expected for this placement based in I(174|g) and adopted I(291|g)/I(281|g)=9.3 {I24}. 
$E1 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from difference between I|g=45 {I4} for both placements of 116.7|g and I|g=11.8 {I12} deduced for component placed from 116.7 level. 
$M1 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Note opposite signs for A{-2} in 1980Ol05 and 1970Wi09 
$E|g=184.3 {I1}, I|g=113 {I15} (1970Wi09, doublet) 
$M1,E2 in 1970Wi09; M1 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=184.3 {I1}, I|g=113 {I15} (1970Wi09, doublet) 
$M1,E2 in 1970Wi09 for doublet; E2 in 1980Ol05 for a single line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) for doublet. 
$E|g=343.1 {I1}, I|g=58 {I8} (1970Wi09, doublet) 
$(M1,E2) in 1970Wi09; E2 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Negative A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=1 transition 
$E|g=156.1 {I1}, I|g=37 {I5} (1970Wi09) 
$M1,E2 in 1970Wi09; M1 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) for a multiplet of several |g rays near this energy, some of which were proposed from |g|g-coin data only 
$E|g=291.2 {I2}, I|g=19 {I4} (1970Wi09) 
$E2 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Negative A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=1 transition 
$E|g=199.0 {I3}, I|g=6 {I3} (1970Wi09) 
$Dipole in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity for the doublet=23.6 {I13}, other placement from 1372 level. Intensity divided in the two placements by the evaluators based on the branching ratio: I|g(371.5)/I|g(304.4)=1.14 {I8} in {+164}Dy({+7}Li,4n|g) dataset, also recommended in the Adopted dataset. 
$|g(|q) for doublet. 
$E|g=371.0 {I4}, I|g=20 {I5} (1970Wi09) 
$E2 in 1980Ol05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) with assumed 50% uncertainty for mixing ratio 
$Negative A{-4} is inconsistent with |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity for the doublet=36.3 {I15}, other placement from 779 level. Intensity divided in the two placements by the evaluators based on the branching ratio: I|g(343)/I|g(435)=0.61 {I5} in {+164}Dy({+7}Li,4n|g) dataset, also recommended in the Adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity for the doublet=114.0 {I30}, other placement from 779 level. Intensity divided in the two placements by the evaluators based on the branching ratio: I|g(229)/I|g(446)=3.49 {I25} in {+164}Dy({+7}Li,4n|g) dataset, also recommended in the Adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$Placement from four levels in Table I of 1976Sv01 
$Ice(K)=0.43 {I3} 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=3.6 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$for an unresolved doublet as indicated by 1976Sv01, but the other placement is not given 
$Ice(K)=0.192 {I8} 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=1.66 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.20 {I4} for 174.27|g+174.0|g 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=2.00 {I20} for 174.27|g+174.0|g 
M$from (p,2n|g)/(p,n|g) excitation-strength ratios (1976Sv01). 
M$|a(K)exp gives mult=M1 for 174.27|g+174.0|g doublet (1976Sv01). But |DJ|p requires E1 for this placement, the placement of 174.0|g from 460 level, expected as M1 may be dominant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.129 {I8} for doublet 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=1.60 {I10} 
M$|a(K)exp gives E1 or E2 for doublet. |DJ|p required E1 for placement from 291.0 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$E1 quoted by 1976Sv01 from 1971Fu10 ({+167}Yb |e decay data) 
$Delayed |g 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.71 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.85 {I2} 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=1.60 {I10} 
M$|a(K)exp normalized to |a(K)(E2)=0.1422 (and not |a(K)(M2)=1.55) gives consistent |a(K)exp values for transitions of known multipolarities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$229.67 in Table I of 1976Sv01 seems a misprint, E|g listed as 228.7 authors' Fig. 11b 
$Ice(K)=2.58 {I5} for doublet 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.37 {I1} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$(M1) quoted by 1976Sv01 from 1971Fu10 ({+167}Yb |e decay data) 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.53 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.20 {I4} for 174.27|g+174.0|g 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=2.00 {I20} for 174.27|g+174.0|g 
M$|a(K)exp gives mult=M1 for 174.27|g+174.0|g doublet (1976Sv01). But |DJ|p requires E1 for this placement, the placement of 174.0|g from 460 level, expected as M1 may be dominant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.218 {I8} for 272.30|g+271.26|g 
$|a(K)exp for 272.30|g+271.26|g 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.66 {I22} probably for 272.30|g+271.26|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.20 {I2} for doublet 
$|a(K)exp for doublet gives mult=E1 or E2 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.94 {I3} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$mixed with a line from {+166}Er 
$Ice(K)=0.242 {I8} for doublet 
$|a(K)exp for doublet 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=1.70 {I15} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$mixed with a line from {+166}Er 
$Ice(K)=0.118 {I7} 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=1.90 {I20} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.054 {I7} for doublet 
$|a(K)exp for doublet 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.91 {I30} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.101 {I7} for doublet 
$|a(K)exp for doublet 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=1.50 {I35} for doublet 
RI$for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.097 {I7} for doublet 
$|a(K)exp for doublet 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=2.00 {I50} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$for doublet as indicated by 1976Sv01, but the other placement is unknown 
$Ice(K)=0.059 {I7} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unplaced in 1976Sv01. Placement from the Adopted Gammas 
$Ice(K)=0.048 {I7} for a doubly-placed |g 
$I|g(p,2n|g)/I|g(p,n|g)=0.95 {I30} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,M$placed by evaluators based on the Adopted Level, Gammas, but M1 from ce data is inconsistent |DJ|p, which requires E1. It is likely that this |g ray is a doublet 
$Ice(K)=0.133 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI |g is doubly-placed; however, |g|g coin data in (d,2n|g) indicate that most of the intensity belongs with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI |g is doubly-placed; however, |g|g coin data indicate that most of the intensity belongs with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI contaminated by |g from {+169}Tm and/or {+167}Tm; from |g|g coin, only a small fraction of I|g|?42 belongs with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from recoil-corrected level-energy difference. 
M,MR from subshell ratios in |b{+-} decay. Other |d: 0.036 {I+7-9} from |a(exp) in (|g,|g): Mossbauer effect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR -0.116 {I4} and -0.146 {I16} in Coulomb excitation; -0.145 {I14}, 0.143 {I5}, -0.160 {I16}, 0.149 {I3} and -0.21 {I6} in |e decay. Adopted value is weighted average of these discrepant data (using limitation of relative statistical weights method); the unweighted average is -0.153 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI from |e decay. However, I|g=10.21 {I5} (1999Ro03) in Coulomb excitation is not consistent with this. Other I(118|g)/I(110|g): 11 {I2} (1967Se09) and 11.0 {I10} (1977Ta10) in Coulomb excitation; 11 {I3} in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 39 {I6} in |e decay, 43 {I9} in (p,2n|g), 45.2 {I5} (1999Ro03), 49.1 {I11} (1977Ta10), 56 {I5} (1967Se09) in Coulomb excitation. 
M from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E|g from level scheme and I|g limit from |e decay. Possibly this is the unplaced E|g=101.0 {I5} |g seen in (p,2n|g); if so, I|g=18 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 99.6 {I12} (1999Ro03) and 93.7 {I24} (1977Ta10) in Coulomb excitation. Other I|g: 101 {I14} in (p,2n|g); 79 {I8} (1967Se09) in Coulomb excitation. 
MR unweighted average of -0.174 {I3} (1999Ro03), -0.123 {I14} (1977Ta10) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E|g from level scheme and I|g limit from |e decay. Possibly this is the unplaced E=72.0 {I5} |g seen in (p,2n|g); if so, I|g|?23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI from 1999Ro03 in Coulomb excitation. Other I|g: 52 {I5} (1977Ta10) in Coulomb excitation; 336 in (p,2n|g); 114 (1974Ba66) in (d,3n|g). 
MR weighted average of -0.199 {I20} (1999Ro03), -0.127 {I35} (1977Ta10) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from M1:M2:M3 in 1968Ca06. 
E from level energy difference. 
M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N2:N3:(N4+N5):O1:(O2+O3)= 100:36.8 {I14}:38.0 {I14}:0.9 {I2}:1.0 {I2}:22.1 {I6}:6.4 {I3}:7.6 {I2}:0.20 {I2}: 3.7 {I1}:2.08 {I6} (1968Ca06); M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5)=100:31 {I3}:34 {I3}: |?1.2, N1:N2:N3=100:25 {I3}:41 {I5}, M/N=4.2 {I5}, N/O=6.4 {I10} (1971MaXG). Other: (|a(M)exp + |a(N)exp)=106 {I6} (from |bce coin (1959Ch31)); value is inconsistent with adopted multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from the recoil-corrected energy difference between E|g=118.18940 {I14} and E|g=109.77924 {I3} (2000He14). 
TI from intensity balance at 8.4 level; |e feeding not expected (|DJ=2, |D|p=no). |S(Ice)=253 {I7} (1976Ar06). 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M M1:M2:M3:N:O=43 {I5}:13 {I3}:15 {I3}:16 {I3}:3.3 {I5} (1976Ar06); M1:M2:M3:M4:M5=100:34.5 {I20}:39.0 {I20}:7.1 {I9}:5.8 {I8} (2000AlZY); O1:O2:O3:P1=18.6 {I7}:5.5 {I3}:4.4 {I3}:1.0 {I1} (2001KoZQ) (cf. 18.6:7.9:135:1.10 from theory). See {+169}Er |b{+-} decay and {+169}Tm(|g,|g) Mossbauer datasets for additional ce data. 
M,MR from Adopted Gammas (based on subshell ratios in |b{+-} decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from Adopted Gammas. |d from |e decay: -0.145 {I14} (1969Gu01, |g|g(|q)), 0.143 {I5} (from L2/L1=0.1224 {I23}, weighted average of data from 1969Gu01, 1975Me08, 1976Ar06, 1985AkZW, 1987BaZB), 0.149 {I3} (from L3/L1=0.0478 {I16}, weighted average of data from 1969Gu01, 1975Me08, 1976Ar06, 1985AkZW, 1987BaZB), -0.160 {I16} (|g|g(|q), 1978Ve07), and -0.21 {I6} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12); the weighted average of these is 0.1478 {I25} (unweighted average, 0.161 {I13}). 
M |a(K)exp=2.02 {I7} (Ice from 1976Ar06), 2.04 {I2} (1995Zh20); |a(L)exp=0.325 {I3} (Ice from 1990Wa28); L1:L2:L3=100:12.3 {I6}:4.79 {I16} (1969Gu01); K:L1:L2:L3=34.9 {I11}:4.87 {I9}:0.56 {I6}:0.24 {I2} (1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3=100:12.58 {I25}:5.0 {I2} (1975Me08); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:(O+P)= 129.0 {I16}:14.9 {I4}:5.6 {I2}:20.4 {I7}:3.8 {I3}:1.6 {I2}:6.1 {I10}:1.7 {I3} (1985AkZW); L1:L2:L3=100:12.7 {I5}:5.32 {I25} (1987BaZB). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.69 {I3} (Ice from 1976Ar06); K:M=1.28 {I6}:0.30 {I5} (1976Ar06); K:L1:L2:L3=31.9 {I5}:3.4 {I2}:16.0 {I4}:14.5 {I6} (1985AkZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI from intensity balance at 118.2 and 138.9 levels. Identical positive and negative corrections to I(|g+ce)(exp) (=34.4 {I16}) are consistent with zero |e feeding to each. 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. I|g(exp)=0.578 {I24} (1986Me07), 0.53 {I6} (1983Fu12), 0.486 {I33}, 0.535 {I29}, 0.45 {I4}, 0.514 {I27}, 0.547 {I8}, 0.55 {I5} (all from 2000Mo02); the average of these is 0.545 {I9}. 
MR unweighted average of 0.0323 {I21} (from L2/L3=0.135 {I5}, weighted average of data from 1969Gu01, 1976Ar06, 2000AlZY) and 0.0274 {I8} (from L3/L1=0.0526 {I22}, weighted average of data from 1969Gu01, 1976Ar06, 2000AlZY); the weighted average is 0.0280 {I16}. Other: 0.00 {I5} (|g|g(|q), 1967BeZX). 
M |a(L)exp=38 {I4}, |a(M)exp=8.7 {I7} (Ice from 1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=6.3 {I6}:0.82 {I7}:0.36 {I4}:1.42 {I13}:0.19 {I2}:0.08 {I1} (1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3=100:13.3 {I7}:5.4 {I8}, M1:M2:M3:(N+O)=100:13.7 {I3}:5.26 {I25}:30 {I4}, M/(N+O)=0.25 {I3} (apparently misprinted) (1969Gu01); L1:L2:L3=100:14 {I1}:5.0 {I6} (2000AlZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.545 {I5} (1995Zh20, K| x ray-|g coin); |a(L)exp=0.484 {I18} (Ice from 1990Wa28); L1:L2:L3=29.2 {I5}:114 {I2}:100 (1966Er03); L1:L2:L3=28.5 {I9}:113 {I2}:100 (1975Me08); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=6.2 {I3}:0.72 {I9}:2.5 {I1}:2.2 {I1}:1.6 {I3}:0.33 {I5} (1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3=28.8 {I6}:110 {I10}:100, L3/M3=4.17 {I15}, M1:M2:M3=28 {I3}:115 {I8}:100 (1968Gi06); K:L:M:N=44.9 {I14}:39.7 {I15}:9.78 {I15}:2.30 {I8} (1990Wa28). Other: 1972Ag03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR unweighted average of 0.41 {I3} (|a(L3)exp, 1972Ag03), 0.425 {I9} and 0.434 {I7} (from L2/L1=0.211 {I5} and L3/L1=0.118 {I3}, respectively, the weighted averages of data from 1969Gu01, 1975Me08, 1976Ar06, 1987BaZB), -0.20 {I+8-11} and -0.19 {I5} (1978Ve07, |g|g(|q)), -0.44 {I1} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12), 0.32 {I10} (|a(K)exp, 1990Wa28), -0.20 {I+4-3} (1994De01, |g|g(|q)), 0.19 {I+4-5} (|a(K)exp, 1995Zh20); uncertainty (0.04) expanded to 0.13 to include most precise datum. 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF ALL MR: -0.424 17. 
M |a(K)exp=0.515 {I5} (1995Zh20, K| x ray-|g coin), 0.498 {I14} (Ice from 1990Wa28), 0.48 {I3} (Ice from 1976Ar06), 0.52 {I3} (1973El15), 0.488 {I25} (Ice from 1976Ar06); |a(L3)exp=0.0071 {I7} (1972Ag03); L1:L2:L3=100:21.2 {I10}:12.0 {I4} (1969Gu01); K:L1:L2:L3=729 {I15}:100:21.2 {I8}:11.5 {I5} (1975Me08); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=10.7 {I7}:1.59 {I5}:0.31 {I3}:0.17 {I2}:0.43 {I3}:0.12 {I1} (1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3=100:21.3 {I9}:11.9 {I6} (1987BaZB); K:L:M:N=80.2 {I23}:14.91 {I18}:3.31 {I7}:0.84 {I3} (1990Wa28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -0.306 {I17} (1969Gu01, |g|g(|q)), 0.329 {I7} (from L2/L1=0.1430 {I23}, weighted average of data in 1969Gu01, 1975Me08, 1976Ar06, 1987BaZB), 0.320 {I8} (from L3/L1=0.0571 {I22}, weighted average of data of 1969Gu01, 1975Me08, 1976Ar06, 1987BaZB), -0.352 {I18} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12). Other values: -0.29 {I+5-10} (1978Ve07, |g|g(|q)), -6.1 {I+4-6} (1994De01, |g|g(|q)). 1994De01 advocate the larger of the |g|g(|q) solutions and attribute the discrepancy between their |d and that from ce data to penetration effects; the evaluator rejects this |d because, as also noted by 1999Sc05, it would have a deleterious effect on decay scheme intensity balance. 
M |a(K)exp=0.388 {I4} (1995Zh20), 0.375 {I14} (Ice from 1976Ar06), 0.386 {I7} (Ice from 1990Wa28), |a(K)exp=0.39 {I2} (1973El15), |a(K)exp=0.38 {I2} (1975Me08); L1:L2:L3=100:15.6 {I9}:6.1 {I3} (1969Gu01); K:L1:L2:L3=732 {I15}:100:14.2 {I3}:5.71 {I23} (1975Me08); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=13.4 {I5}:1.81 {I4}:0.25 {I2}:0.10 {I1}:0.5 {I1}:0.14 {I3} (1976Ar06); L1:L2:L2=100:14.3 {I4}:4.8 {I5} (1987BaZB); K:L:M=100.0 {I18}:16.85 {I23}:3.82 {I6} (1990Wa28); M/L=0.235 {I7}, N+/M=0.281 {I17} (1970Mi15). Other: 1972Ag03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.053 {I5} (Ice from 1962Gr16), 0.050 {I2} (Ice from 1976Ar06), 0.0514 {I10} (Ice from 1990Wa28); K/L=3.49 {I11}, K/L3=15.5 {I8} (1971Bo49); K:L1:L2:L3=1641 {I87}:195 {I7}:172 {I5}:100, M1:M2:M3=161 {I16}:152 {I15}:100, L/M=4.17 {I17} (1968Gi06); K:L=50 {I2}:15 {I2} (1976Ar06); K:L:M:N=3.73 {I7}:1.15 {I3}:0.266 {I13}:0.068 {I10} (1990Wa28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.0071 {I4} (1990AdZZ,1990Wa28) and 0.0116 {I1} (1986Me07). 
M from unenumerated ce data of 1993BaZQ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
See comment with 367.7 level. 
E from Adopted Gammas. 
RI upper limit estimated from spectrum (1990WaZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|d for possible M2 admixture: -0.01 {I6} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12); 0.0 from weighted average L2/L1=0.352 {I5} (1969Gu01, 1976Ar06, 1985AkZW, 1987BaZB, 2000AlZY); 0.013 {I+4-6} from weighted average L3/L1=0.475 {I8} (1969Gu01, 1976Ar06, 1985AkZW, 1987BaZB, 2000AlZY) (or<0.010 from unweighted average). 
M |a(K)exp=0.83 {I16} (Ice from 1976Ar06), 1.02 {I15} (K| x ray/|g measurement, 1974Vi05); |a(L1)exp=0.0911 {I25} (Ice from 1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3=100:37.2 {I20}:46.5 {I20} (1969Gu01); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=36 {I7}:3.96 {I11}:1.40 {I4}:1.80 {I6}:1.7 {I2}:0.40 {I5} (1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5):N1:N2:N3:(N4+N5):(O+P)= 100.0 {I13}:34.8 {I6}:48.3 {I7}:19.3 {I6}:7.9 {I4}:9.4 {I4}:1.5 {I2}:4.8 {I2}:1.5 {I2}: 2.4 {I4}:0.3 {I1}:0.17 {I2} (1985AkZW); L1:L2:L3=100:34.5 {I12}:45.5 {I24} (1987BaZB); L1:L2:L3=100:35 {I3}:42 {I3} (2000AlZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR <0.12 (from K/L1, 1972Ag03) and +0.5 {I4} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12). Other: 0.095 {I16} reported by 1976Ar06, but basis for this is unclear. 
M |a(K)exp=0.041 {I3} (Ice from 1972Ag03); K:L1:L2:L3=857 {I107}:100:15 {I6}:16 {I7} (1972Ag03); K:L=45 {I5}:10 {I5} (1976Ar06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR |<0.025 (from K/L1, 1972Ag03), 0.032 {I8} (1976Ar06), -0.123 {I+22-20} (|g|g(|q), 1978Ve07), -0.060 {I19} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12), -0.03 {I4} (1988MeZW, |g|g(|q), evaluator's analysis). 
M |a(K)exp=0.030 {I1} (Ice from 1972Ag03), 0.024 {I2} (Ice from 1976Ar06); K:L1:L2:L3=867 {I67}:100:13.8 {I12}:14.2 {I10} (1972Ag03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
RI from 0.00181 {I11} and <0.0055 (2000Mo02), 0.00267 {I10} (1990Wa28), 0.0034 {I9} (1976Ge12), 0.00292 {I11} (1972Bb13). 0.010 {I5} (2000Mo02, data set E-1) is a statistical outlier. Other I|g: 0.0228 {I16} (186me07), 0.019 {I1} (1978Ve07). 
M |a(K)exp=0.17 {I9} (Ice from 1990Wa28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.00172 {I31} (2000Mo02), 0.00049 {I3} (1990Wa28), 0.00084 {I28} (1976Ge12), 0.00103 {I20} (1972Bb13). Ice and I|g from 1990Wa28 imply |a(K)exp=0.35 {I5} (cf. |a(K)=0.074 for probable multipolarity). This suggests a major error in I|g or Ice(K) in 1990Wa28, probably the latter. I|g=0.00113 {I23} if the datum from 1990Wa28 is omitted from the weighted average. I|g=0.0034 {I5} (1986Me07) is a statistical outlier. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from 1990Wa28. Other I|g: 0.020 {I2} (1978Ve07). 
M from unenumerated ce data of 1993BaZQ. 
Seen in only one spectrum; existence questionable (1990Wa28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of 0.187 {I7} and 0.183 {I4} (based on L2/L1=0.168 {I6} and L3/L1=0.087 {I3}, respectively, from weighted average of data from 1969Gu01, 1976Ar06, 1985AkZW, 1987BaZB, 2000MeZW), and +0.167 {I17} (nuclear orientation, 1987Da11,1987Kr12). However, from time differential |g|g(|q), 1997De02 conclude that 94|g is pure M1 and discrepancy with |d from ce data is due to penetration effects; see comment on |d(198|g) also. 
M |a(K)exp=2.9 {I3} (Ice from 1976Ar06); L1:L2:L3=100:16.9 {I10}:9.3 {I4} (1969Gu01); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=7.5 {I7}:1.18 {I4}:0.19 {I3}:0.10 {I2}:0.4 {I1}:0.16 {I4} (1976Ar06); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N= 199.0 {I27}:31.9 {I5}:4.9 {I3}:2.5 {I2}:7.2 {I4}:1.6 {I2}:0.8 {I1}:0.25 {I3} (1985AkZW): L1:L2:L3=1.0:0.179 {I6}:0.085 {I5} (2000MeZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from unenumerated ce data of 1993BaZQ. 
Seen in only one spectrum; existence questionable (1990Wa28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.0077 {I43} and 0.0044 {I3} (2000Mo02), 0.00493 {I15} (1990Wa28), 0.0070 {I9} (1986Me07), 0.0045 {I8} (1976Ge21), 0.0045 {I6} (1972Bb13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000540 {I12} (1990Wa28), 0.00064 {I22} (1976Ge21), 0.00056 {I6} (1972Bb13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000329 {I7} (1990Wa28), 0.00042 {I25} (1976Ge21), 0.00038 {I4} (1972Bb13). Other I|g: 0.0015 {I3} (1986Me07). 
M |a(K)exp|<0.053 (Ice from 1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000297 {I20} (1990Wa28), 0.00039 {I28} (1976Ge21), 0.00036 {I3} (1972Bb13). Other I|g: 0.0009 {I2} (1986Me07). 
M |a(K)exp|<0.065 (Ice from 1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.00408 {I7} (1990Wa28), 0.0048 {I8} (1986Me07), 0.0048 {I8} (1976Ge21), 0.00414 {I20} (1972Bb13). 
M |a(K)exp=0.035 {I5} (Ice from 1970Al02); K/L=3.7 {I21} (1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.01154 {I18} (1990Wa28), 0.0111 {I8} (1986Me07), 0.013 {I1} (1978Ve07), 0.0132 {I11} (1976Ge21), 0.0117 {I5} (1972Bb13). 
M |a(K)exp=0.028 {I4} (Ice from 1970Al02); |a(K)exp=0.0340 {I24} (Ice from 1990Wa28); K/L=6 {I3} (1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.01390 {I25} (1990Wa28), 0.0116 {I8} (1986Me07), 0.020 {I5} (1978Ve07), 0.0154 {I14} (1976Ge21), 0.0137 {I6} (1972Bb13). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0178 {I21} (Ice from 1970Al02); |a(K)exp=0.0155 {I26} (Ice from 1990Wa28); K/L=6.0 {I19} (1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000333 {I8} (1990Wa28), 0.00034 {I25} (1976Ge21), 0.000341 {I36} (1972Bb13) other I|g: 0.0057 {I8} (1986Me07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.00535 {I9} (1990Wa28), 0.0063 {I10} (1986Me07), 0.005 {I2} (1978Ve07), 0.062 {I8} (1976Ge21), 0.00528 {I22} (1972Bb13). 
M |a(K)exp=0.025 {I3} (Ice from 1970Al02); |a(K)exp=0.017 {I4} (Ice from 1990Wa28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.00317 {I6} (1990Wa28), 0.0026 {I5} (1986Me07), 0.005 {I3} (1978Ve07), 0.0035 {I8} (1976Ge21), 0.00322 {I14} (1972Bb13). 
M |a(K)exp=0.021 {I7} (Ice from 1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000087 {I6} (1990Wa28), 0.00008 {I8} (1976Ge21), 0.000109 {I8} (1972Bb13). 
M |a(K)exp|<0.057 (Ice from 1970Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000212 {I5} (1990Wa28), 0.00025 {I22} (1976Ge21), 0.000224 {I17} (1972Bb13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000528 {I17} (1990Wa28), 0.00062 {I25} (1976Ge21), 0.000565 {I28} (1972Bb13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 0.000578 {I10} (1990Wa28), 0.00062 {I28} (1976Ge21), 0.000607 {I28} (1972Bb13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(exp)=290 {I49}, the weighted average of |a(exp)=325 {I35} (1964Ka02) and |a(exp)=220 {I50} (1968Wa05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|eB(E2)|^=1.1 {I3} (1955He64). 
A{-2}=-0.456 {I24}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1977Ta10). 
MR unweighted average of -0.116 {I4} from 1999Ro03 ({+58}Ni-|g(|q)) and -0.146 {I16} from 1965As03 (|a-|g(|q); A{-2}=-0.339 {I14}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1999Ro03. Others: 11.0 {I20} (1967Se09), 11.0 {I10} (1977Ta10). 
A{-2}=+0.44 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.39 {I15} (1977Ta10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.534 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.016 {I20} (1977Ta10). 
MR unweighted average of -0.146 {I3} (1999Ro03), -0.105 {I11} (1977Ta10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g/I(193|g)=0.452 {I5} (1999Ro03), 0.56 {I5} (1967Se09). 
A{-2}=+0.455 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I3} (1977Ta10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.025 {I4}, as deduced from |e(K)B(E2)|^=6.2|*10{+-5} {I9} (1963Di09) and |e(|g)B(E2)|^=2.45|*10{+-3} {I25} (1967Se09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I3}, as deduced from |e(K)B(E2)|^=2.4|*10{+-4} {I3} (1963Di09) and |e(|g)B(E2)|^=0.0132 {I13} (1967Se09). Other: 0.010 (1960Na13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.017 {I3}, as deduced from |e(K)B(E2)|^=2.9|*10{+-4} {I3} (1963Di09) and |e(|g)B(E2)|^=0.0167 {I22} (1967Se09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g/I(305|g)=0.996 {I12} (1999Ro03); other: 0.79 {I8} (1967Se09). 
A{-2}=-0.532 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1977Ta10). 
MR unweighted average of -0.174 {I3} (1999Ro03), -0.123 {I14} (1977Ta10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g/I(391|g)=0.587 {I7} (1999Ro03). 
A{-2}=-0.58 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I11} (1977Ta10). 
MR weighted average of -0.199 {I20} (1999Ro03) and -0.127 {I35} (1977Ta10) (as recommended in 1999Ro03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1999Ro03. 
RI from 0.14<I|g/I(470|g)<0.44 in 1999Ro03 if I(470|g)=12.1. I|g=3.3 estimated from rotational-model expectations (peak masked by intense 390.9|g in 1977Ta10); 1999Ro03 report 1.7<I|g<5.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(110|g) and I(110|g):I(118|g)=100:8.5 in (p,2n|g) E(p)=16 MeV (1974Ba66). 
I|g=8.5, A{-2}=+0.18 {I10} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
I|g=84, A{-2}=+0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 
RI deduced from I|g(177|g) and I(177|g):I(198.0|g)=53:84 in (p,2n|g) E(p)=16 MeV (1974Ba66); consistent with adopted branching. See also the comment on the 198.3|g from 1262 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(177.2|g) and adopted branching from 316.1 level. 
I|g=25.1, A{-2}=+0.09 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(193|g) and I(193|g):I(241|g)=24.3:10.6 in (p,2n|g) E(p)=16 MeV (1974Ba66); consistent with result from 1973FuZF. I|g=29 {I3} in (d,3n|g) may include component from (d,4n|g). 
I|g=10.6, A{-2}=+0.20 {I3} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(206.1|g) and adopted branching from 345.0 level. 
I|g=4.6 in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66), 2.6 in 10 MeV (p,2n|g) (1973FuZF). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(206.1|g) and adopted branching from 345.0 level. 
I|g=24.2 for doublet in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66), 55 in 10 MeV (p,2n|g) (1973FuZF). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g=169 {I17} for 226.8|g and 228.7|g combined, and I|g(226.8|g)=0.30 {I15}. 
I|g=59, A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(63.1|g) and I(261|g):I(63|g)=3.2:83.0 in (p,2n|g) E(p)=16 MeV (1974Ba66). 
A{-2}=+0.21 {I9} for doublet in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=39 {I4} for (117|g+118|g) and deduced I|g(118|g)=11 {I6} (see comment on 118|g from 118 level). 
I|g=22.2, A{-2}=+0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I(356.7|g+474.8|g), and relative branchings from 474.7 level in {+169}Yb |e decay (32.018 d). 
I|g=5.2 in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(141.8|g) and I(142|g):I(259|g) in (p,2n|g) E(p)=16 MeV (1974Ba66). 
I|g=7.8, A{-2}=+0.21 {I9} in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(514.9|g) and relative branchings from 633.0 level in {+169}Yb |e decay (32.018 d); 1974Ba66 assign transition to 1598.3 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(514.9|g) and relative branchings from 633.0 level in {+169}Yb |e decay (32.018 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI all intensity is attributed to 964.0 level placement (I|g, as deduced from I|g(514.9|g) and relative branchings from 633.0 level, is negligible). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(528.4|g) and relative branchings from 646.6 level for E(p)=16 MeV. 
I|g=1.4 in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=25.1, A{-2}=+0.09 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} for multiplet in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66); this includes component from (p,p'|g). 
RI upper limit deduced from I|g=63 {I6} for both placements of 307.7|g plus contaminant, assuming I|g=53 {I6} for 316 level placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$doubly placed by 1973FuZF, but unplaced by 1974Ba66 (who report neither the 782 level nor the 832 level); total I|g attributed to 781.6 level placement because I|g data for other |g's suggest 1974Ba66 excite only 782 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
1974Ba66 report transition with E|g=662.6, but assign it to another isotope. 
I|g=4 in 10 MeV (p,2n|g) (1973FuZF). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=2.2 in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 
RI deduced from I|g=25.2 {I25} for 172.7|g+175.0|g, and I|g(172.7|g)=12 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=3.2 in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66); A{-2}=+0.21 {I9} for doublet. 
RI deduced from I|g=37 {I4} for 261.1|g and 262.7|g combined, and I|g(261.1|g)=5 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=9.0 in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 
RI deduced from I|g(632.3|g) and relative branchings from 964.0 level in 1973FuZF. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g=30 {I3} for both placements of 336.6|g and I|g=13 {I6} for 345.0 level placement. 
I|g=24.2, A{-2}=-0.04 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I20} for doublet in 16 MeV (p,2n|g) (1974Ba66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI value can be attributed to 1112.6 level or 1548.4 level placement, but not both (see comment with 1113 level). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI upper limit deduced from I|g=12.0 {I12} for both placements of 494.2|g plus possible component from {+170}Er(d,2n|g), assuming I|g=2.5 {I13} for 633.0 level placement. Assignment to 1598 level is tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from weighted average of measured energies of the M1, M2, N1, N3 and O1 conversion electron lines (2015In02) 
MR$deduced by 2015In02 from previous measurements of subshell ratios and comparison with their measured ce sepctrum 
$Measured M2/M1=0.34 {I4}, N3/N1=0.40 {I6} (2015In02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from weighted average of measured energies of the L1, L2, L3, M1, M2, N1, and O1 conversion electron lines (2015In02) 
M$measured L2/L1=0.108 {I3}, L3/L1=0.057 {I3}, M2/M1=0.112 {I11}, M3/M1=0.050 {I14}, N2/N1=0.128 {I4}, N3/N1=0.046 {I4} (2015In02); possible nuclear structure effect on this transition analyzed and discussed by 2015In02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1 + E2]
decay_comment:
E$Although intensity was not provided by the author, the compiler assumes 0.6 keV uncertainty for the |g energy based on Fig.1 which shows I|g< 100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q), with alignment parameter |s/J|?0.42 {I3}. |d(E2/M1)=-0.15 {I2} from DCO and POL data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M E2 from |a(K)exp in (n,|g) E=0-136 eV; possible M1 component implied by |a(L1)exp would be inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR E2+M1 (|d=0.95 {I+33-15}) from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with this |DJ=2 placement; either |g is complex or misplaced or mult is incorrect (1986Ho12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI possibly includes the 409|g from |g|g coin in (n,|g) E=0-136 eV which deexcites the adopted 758.3 level; the 758.3 and 760.4 levels would not have been resolved in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR E2+M1, |d=1.6 {I+77-7} from |a(K)exp; M1 component inconsistent with other branching information for 1179 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1228.0 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal: |g coin. 
RI$other: 30 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal: |g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$reported in (n,|g) E=0-136 eV only. Possibly the 1354.7|g that deexcites a 1395 level in (n,|g) E=thermal: |g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
|a(L2)exp=68 {I7}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:M5=5.80 {I12}:67.6 14:82.8 {I17}: 0.979 {I20}:17.5 {I4}:22.4 {I4}:0.300 {I18}:0.311 {I12}. Data from 1996Ho12 are consistent with other L1:L2:L3=100 {I15}:1160 {I90}:1450 {I110} (1967Ba17). 
M,MR from subshell ratios (|h{+2}=23 for fit). However, |d>3 from |a(L2)exp. Other |d: 1.01 {I+11-8} from 1967Ba17. 
E$others: 38.713 {I2} (1966Sh03), 38.712 {I6} (1989Du03). 
RI$others: 0.170 {I17} (1966Sh03); 0.35 {I1} (1989Du03). 
 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 75.23 {I9} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.89 {I8} (2007ChZX) 
|a(L2)exp=1.18 {I11}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.585 {I12}:1.180 {I24}:1.180 {I24}:0.1070 {I21}:0.269 {I5}:0.284 {I6}. Other: L1:L2:L3=100 {I10}:197 {I20}:200 {I14} (1967Ba17) 
MR from subshell ratios. Other |d: 0.80 {I6} (1967Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 114.50 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 3.04 {I6} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.63 {I6}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.63 {I6}:0.0702 {I21}:0.305 {I6}:0.280 {I6}:0.0133 {I3}:0.112 {I2}:0.0725 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 110.95 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.311 {I15} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.59 {I3}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.588 {I12}:0.0637 {I13}:0.369 {I7}:0.604 {I12}:0.0136 {I10}:0.0866 {I17}:0.0892 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 149.66 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 6.77 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.80 {I6}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2= 0.795 {I16}:0.1020 {I20}:0.00882 {I18}:0.00121 {I5}:0.0225 {I5}:0.00233 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1994HoZZ. Others: 68.649 {I0} (1996Ho12), 68.54 {I6} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 1.67 {I22} (2007ChZX). 
For 144|g-ray doublet: |a(L1)exp=0.074 {I4}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.0738 {I15}:0.0422 {I8}:0.0519 {I10}:0.0131 {I10}:0.0107 {I3}:0.0137 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 144.480 {I1} for doublet. 
E$other: 144.43 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 5.67 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
For 144|g-ray doublet ce data, see comment on 144.5|g from 183.197 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1994HoZZ. Other: 68.649 {I0} in 1996Ho12. 
For doublet ce data, see comment on 68.6|g from 183.190 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
For doublet, |a(K)exp=0.157 {I9}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.157 {I3}:0.0150 {I3}:0.0232 {I5}:0.0204 {I4}:0.00377 {I15}:0.00629 {I13}:0.00615 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 89.73 {I11} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.110 {I20} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=4.4 {I4}; K:L1:L2=4.44 {I9}:0.388 {I12}:0.081 {I8}. 
M M1 from |a(K)exp; however, L subshell data indicate some E2 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$other: 165.69 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 3.13 {I6} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.62 {I3}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.616 {I12}:0.0772 {I15}:0.00760 {I15}:0.00214 {I15}:0.0159 5:0.00183 {I9}:0.00064 {I10}. 
MR subshell data not mutually consistent; deduced |d values range from 0 to 0.6 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 204.41 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 8.30 {I18} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.341 {I17}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2= 0.341 {I7}:0.0466 {I9}:0.00410 {I16}:0.00063 {I8}:0.01060 {I21}:0.00119 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L2)exp=4.0 {I6}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.261 {I10}:3.95 {I8}:4.00 {I8}:0.053 {I5}:0.885 {I18}:0.992 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 105.11 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.743 {I22} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=1.84 {I9}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 1.84 {I4}:0.236 {I5}:0.0333 {I7}:0.0213 {I9}:0.0676 {I14}:0.0147 {I13}:0.0101 {I15}. 
MR based on 0.67 {I11} from |a(K)exp, 0.25 {I2} from M subshell data, and 0.10 {I2} to 0.74 {I9} from L subshell data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 180.92 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 3.67 {I13} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.44 {I4}; K:L1:L2:M1:M2:M3= 0.443 {I9}:0.0564 {I11}:0.00745 {I15}:0.01240 {I25}:0.00184 18:0.00102 {I9}. Other: K:L1:L2=800 {I120}:100 {I7}:32 {I6} (1967Ba17) 
MR from subshell ratios. Other |d: 0.58 {I+12-7} (1967Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 219.65 {I5} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 3.47 {I6} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.191 {I10}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.191 {I4}:0.0240 {I5}:0.0157 {I3}:0.01150 {I23}:0.0060 {I4}:0.0041 3:0.00280 {I25}. Other: K:L1:L2:L3=630 {I60}:100 {I10}:65 {I10}:45 {I10} (1967Ba17) 
Other |d: 1.32 {I+26-16} (1967Ba17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 87.44 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.23 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=3.98 {I20}; K:L1:L2:M1:M2= 3.98 {I8}:0.577 {I17}:0.0600 {I24}:0.103 {I3}:0.0171 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 198.46 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.91 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.411 {I21}; K:L1:L2:M1:M2= 0.411 {I8}:0.0544 {I11}:0.0035 {I6}:0.0174 {I10}:0.0024 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 237.19 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 5.26 {10} (2007ChZX) 
|a(L1)exp=0.238 {I12}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2= 0.238 {I5}:0.0342 {I7}:0.00241 {I17}:0.00063 {I11}:0.00658 {I26}:0.00071 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$other: 63.92 {I22} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.16 {I8} (2007ChZX) 
For doublet: |a(L1)exp=0.93 {I11}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 0.930 {I19}:1.60 {I3}:1.99 {I4}:0.172 {I3}:0.355 {I7}:0.372 {I7}. 
MR from authors' analysis (1996Ho12). Evaluator obtains 0.65 {I5} from subshell ratios. |d=0.73 {I+17-16} from |a(L1)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 66.06 {I10} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.49 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
|a(L1)exp=1.42 {I14}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 1.42 {I3}:0.575 {I12}:0.573 {I11}:0.275 {I6}:0.157 {I3}:0.155 {I3}. 
MR from subshell ratios; however, |a(L1)exp exceeds |a(L1)(E2 theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 156.03 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.113 {I16} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.45 {I4}; K:L1:L2:M1= 0.45 {I3}:0.097 {I3}:0.0170 {I26}:0.027 {I3}. 
MR from |a(L2)exp; |a(K)exp and |a(M1)exp not consistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 231.71 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.57 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.254 {I15}; K:L1:M1=0.254 {I5}:0.0349 {I7}:0.0092 {I8} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1994HoZZ. Others: 130.027 {I0} (1996Ho12), 129.99 {I5} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.895 {I24} (2007ChZX). 
|a(K)exp=1.09 {I5}; K:L1:L2:M1:M2= 1.090 {I22}:0.145 {I3}:0.0163 {I3}:0.0313 {I6}:0.0040 {I5}. 
MR from |a(L1)exp and |a(K)exp; |a(L2)exp inconsistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 235.12 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.12 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.249 {I12}; K:L1:L2=662 {I18}:100:7.4 {I10} (1996Ho12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 310.97 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 2.38 {I5} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.106 {I5}; K:L1:L2:M1=0.1060 {I21}:0.0157 {I3}:0.0035:0.00348 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 171.81 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.372 {I17} (2007ChZX) 
$For 171|g-ray doublet ce data, see comment on 171.9|g to 183.197 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$For 171|g-ray doublet: |a(K)exp=1.38 {I12} (1994HoZZ,1996Ho12); K:L1:L2:M1:M2= 1.38 {I3}:0.0741 {I15}:0.0103 {I11}:0.0152 {I8}:0.0052 {I10} (1994HoZZ). However, |a(K)exp appears to be too high and is inconsistent with L1/K=0.17 {I3} in 1966Ho12; the latter implies |a(K)exp|?0.44 based on |a(L1)exp=0.0741 {I15} in 1994HoZZ. 
MR from authors' analysis (1996Ho12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(L3)exp=0.103 {I6}; L3:M2:M3=0.103 {I5}:0.051 {I11}:0.049 {I6} (1994HoZZ). 
MR from subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 153.70 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.093 {I14} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.350 {I25}; K:L1=0.350 {I7}:0.084 {I14} (1994HoZZ). 
M |a(K)exp consistent with pure E2 (expected from placement); |a(L1)exp implies |d(E2,M1)=0.7 {I3} suggesting ce line contamination. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.40 {I4}: K:L1=0.403 {I12}:0.081 {I10} (1994HoZZ). 
E$other: 175.2 {I3} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.047 {I17} (2007ChZX) 
MR 0.9 {I3} from |a(K)exp; |<0.4 from |a(L1)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 161.67 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.257 {I16} (2007ChZX) 
|a(L2)exp=0.067 {I4}; L1:L2:L3= 0.0314 {I16}:0.067 {I3}:0.0629 {I13}. L1/K=0.033 {I2} (1996Ho12). 
M,MR E2(+M1), |d|>2.2 from (n,|g) consistent with pure E2 as required by placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 266.81 {I11} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.128 {I14} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.126 {I14}; K:L1:L2:M1=0.126 {I4}:0.0176 {I23}:0.0050 {I23}:0.0063 {I19} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 288.34 {I8} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.164 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.115 {I10}; K:L1=0.115 {I5}:0.016 {I3} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 176.49 {I9} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.32 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.443 {I22}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1= 0.443 {I9}:0.0530 {I11}:0.0133 {I12}:0.0075 {I9}:0.0092 {I9}. 
MR from |a(K)exp; however, subshell ratios do not give an internally consistent value for |d. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 242.58 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.22 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.210 {I11}; K:L1:L2:L3:M1= 0.210 {I4}:0.0303 {I9}:0.0073 {I8}:0.0020 {I3}:0.0074 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 92.62 {I21} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.039 {I15} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=3.38 {I20}; K:L1:L2=3.38 {I7}:0.412 {I8}:0.085 {I12}. 
MR from subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 543.58 {I25} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.066 {I20} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0187 {I21}. 
M,MR E2+M1 (|d=1.0 {I+4-3}) from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with placement; either the |g is misplaced or the mult is incorrect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 352.91 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.521 {I22} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.067 {I4}; K:L1=0.0673 {I13}:0.0096 {I5} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 590.18 {I7} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.21 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0188 {I9}; K:L1=0.0188 {I4}:0.00336 {I24} (1994HoZZ). 
MR 0.52 {I12} from |a(K)exp; however, |a(L1)exp indicates pure M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 411.46 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 2.26 {I5} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0473 {I24}; K:L1:M1=0.0473 {I9}:0.00663 {I13}:0.00220 {I22} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 611.80 {I8} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.79 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0079 {I8} implies mult=E2, but placement requires E1; possible contamination of ce line (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 512.01 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.87 {I5} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I2}; K:L1=0.00361 {I14}:0.00050 {I6} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 446.31 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 1.54 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0421 {I21}; K:L1:M1=0.0421 {I8}:0.00611 {I24}:0.00159 {I16} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 343.29 {I6} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.343 {I15} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.081 {I4}; K:L1=0.0809 {I16}:0.0103 {I12} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 474.04 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.14 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.032 {I3}; K:L1=0.0320 {I10}:0.0037 {I3} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$presumably the E|g=510.43 {I11}, I|g=0.58 {I3} line from 2007ChZX which those authors placed from the 662 level, apparently in error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 693.19 {I9} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.29 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0099 {I6}. 
E$placed by 1994Sc51 in {+171}Tm also (the product of double neutron capture). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 99.19 {I17} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.063 {I12} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=2.13 {I13}; K:L1:M1=2.13 {I4}:0.169 {I19}:0.044 {I10} (1994HoZZ). 
MR from |a(K)exp. |d=0.9 {I7} from subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$other: 671.2 {I3} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.11 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
E$also placed by 1994Sc51 in {+171}Tm (the product of double neutron capture). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 268.69 {I9} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.200 {I16} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.124 {I14}; K:L1=0.124 {I4}:0.0240 {I19} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 499.32 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.84 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0067 {I5}; |a(L1)exp=0.00137 {I18} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 384.04 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.86 {I5} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.053 {I4}; K:L1=0.0531 {I11}:0.00796 {I16} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 496.52 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.76 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0305 {I15}; K:L1=0.0305 {I6}:0.00426 {I26} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 400.21 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.683 {I18} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0494 {I25}; K:L1=0.0494 {I10}:0.0062 {I8} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 107.95 {I12} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.105 {I12} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=2.36 {I12}; K:L1:L2=2.36 {I5}:0.329 {I7}:0.031 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=2.8 {I3}; K:L1:L2=2.80 {I6}:0.50 {I3}:0.099 {I14}. 
M |a(L1)exp consistent with pure M1, but cannot rule out small E2 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 632.37 {I6} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.70 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0141 {I7}. 
M,MR M1+E2 (|d=0.78 {I12}) from |a(K)exp in (n,|g); inconsistent with transition to J=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp=0.0027 {I2} implies mult=M1+E2, but placement requires E1; possible ce line contamination (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 724.48 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.65 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I5}; K:L1=0.0095 {I5}:0.00146 {I7} (1994HoZZ). 
MR from |a(K)exp; 0.60 {I11} from |a(L1)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 815.56 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.73 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0066 {I3}; K:L1=0.00654 {I13}:0.00095 {I6} (1994HoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 854.23 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 1.34 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0059 {I3}; K:L1=0.00589 {I12}:0.00085 {I3} (1994HoZZ). 
E also consistent with placement from 1092 to 237 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 824.19 {I10} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.303 {I21} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0016 {I2}. 
M E1 from |a(K)exp; inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 637.75 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 1.19 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0142 {I7}, mult=M1+E2 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 720.61 {I8} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.54 {I3} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0021 {I3}. 
M E1 from |a(K)exp; inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 372.57 {I11} (2007ChZX) 
RI$from 1994HoZZ. Others: 0.024 (1996Ho12), 0.146 {I21} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 800.43 {I18} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.116 {I22} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0072 {I9}, mult=M1+E2 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 303.59 {I8} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.130 {I12} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.110 {I12}. 
M M1(+E2) (|d|<0.7) from |a(K)exp; feeds J=(0) state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 783.41 {I15} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.17 {I4} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0079 {I17}. 
M,MR M1+E2 with |d=0.9 {I+9-4} from |a(K)exp; M1 component inconsistent with |DJ=2 placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 868.67 {I11} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.224 {I22} (2007ChZX) 
M E1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I4}; |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 477.19 {I8} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.228 {I24} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.030 {I6} implies mult=M1(+E2); E2 component inconsistent with placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 956.13 {10} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.31 {I6} (2007ChZX) 
M E1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0021 {I3}; |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 485.07 {I13} (2007ChZX) 
RI$other: 0.133 {I23} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0305 {I18}. 
M,MR M1+E2 (|d=0.50 {I+14-15}) from |a(K)exp; inconsistent with |DJ=2 placement to (0)- state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 995.3 {I4} (2007ChZX). 
RI$other: 0.101 {I22} (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0037 {I7}. 
M,MR E2+M1, |d=1.6 {I+77-7} from |a(K)exp; M1 component inconsistent with other branching information for 1179 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$other: 1354.51 {I23} (2007ChZX). Note that a 1354.7|g deexcites a a 1395 level in (n,|g) E=thermal:|g coin 
RI$other: 0.122 {I22} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 5326 {I6} (1968Lo09) for apparent doublet; second component unidentified. 
RI$other: 0.14 {I5} (1968Lo09) for apparent doublet; second component unidentified. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 5360 {I6} (1968Lo09) for apparent doublet; second component unidentified. 
RI$other: 0.076 {I19} (1968Lo09) for apparent doublet; second component unidentified. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 5428 {I5} (1968Lo09) for apparent doublet; second component unidentified. 
RI$other: 0.180 {I16} (1968Lo09) for apparent doublet; second component unidentified. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5737 {I3} (1968Lo09), 5737 {I2} (1966Sh03) 
RI$others: 0.880 {I17} (1968Lo09), 0.82 {I16} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5858 {I3} (1968Lo09), 5860.9 {I10} (1966Sh03) 
RI$others: 0.230 {I14} (1968Lo09), 0.29 {I6} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5900 {I3} (1968Lo09), 5900 {I3} (1966Sh03) 
RI$others: 0.320 {I15} (1968Lo09), 0.26 {I6} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5911 {I3} (1968Lo09), 5910 {I3} (1966Sh03) 
RI$others: 0.310 {I17} (1968Lo09), 0.29 {I6} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5945 {I3} (1968Lo09), 5945.0 {I5} (1966Sh03) 
RI$0.780 {I15} (1968Lo09), 0.79 {I16} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6003 {I3} (1968Lo09); 6003.8 {I5} (1966Sh03) 
RI$ 0.600 {I15} (1968Lo09), 0.62 {I13} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6356 {I3} (1968Lo09); 6356 {I2} (1966Sh03) 
RI$others: 0.190 {I12} (1968Lo09), 0.22 {I5} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6387.49 {I22} (1968Lo09); 6389 {I2} (1966Sh03) 
RI$others: 0.800 {I14} (1968Lo09), 0.80 {I16} (1966Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I{-|g1|g2}=1.1 {I4} 
E possibly the 409|g from |g|g coin in fig. 5 of 1996Ho12 which deexcites the adopted 758.3 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I{-|g1|g2}=4.6 {I7} 
E$not reported in 1996Ho12; also, E|g fits placement poorly, so evaluator shows placement as tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I{-|g1|g2}=0.3 {I1} 
E$deexcites 863.4 component of triplet of levels. 
E presumably the 626|g from |g|g coin in fig. 5 of 1996Ho12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I{-|g1|g2}=6.2 {I4} 
E$deexcites 862.8 and 863.4 components of triplet of levels. 
E presumably the 658|g from |g|g coin in fig. 5 of 1996Ho12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I{-|g1|g2}=0.6 {I2} 
E$deexcites 860.5 component of triplet of levels. 
E presumably the 745|g from |g|g coin in fig. 5 of 1996Ho12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 13.9 {I9} in (n,|g) E=thermal and 11.2 {I3} in |b{+-} decay. Other: 3.6 {I8} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) E=42 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 47.5 {I25} in (n,|g) E=thermal, 44.9 {I12} in |b{+-} decay, 52.9 {I7} in ({+7}Li,2n|a|g) E-27-34 MeV and 45.9 {I9} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 42 MeV; the weighted average is 49.3 {I21}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 506.8 {I4} and 506.5 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|a|g) at 27-34 MeV and at 42 MeV, respectively. 
RI$other: 5.3 {I20} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) E=42 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 519.4 {I4} and 518.8 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|a|g) at 27-34 MeV and at 42 MeV, respectively. 
RI$weighted average of 4.6 {I20} and 3.5 {I8} from ({+7}Li,2n|a|g) at 27-34 MeV and at 42 MeV, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 18 {I8} from I(496|g):I(706|g)=2.1 {I4}:9.3 {I19} in (n,|g) E=thermal and 13 {I7} from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 340.8 {I4} in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) E=27-34 MeV for peak that is broader than expected. 
RI$other: 200 {I8} in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) E=27-34 MeV for peak that is broader than expected. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp(352|g)=0.025 {I5} corrected for contribution from ce(M) of 296|g in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) E=42 MeV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from |SI(|g+ce) to 5.0 level, corresponding to 0% |b{+-} feeding of level; I(|g+ce) could range up to I(|g+ce)=933, corresponding to 2.3% |b{+-} feeding of level. 
$M1:M2:M3=100:38 {I3}:42 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.72 {I10} (Ice(K) from 1961Ar15); K/L=6.2 {I7} (1961Ar15); L1:L2:L3=100:13.1 {I2}:5.2 {I2} (1972Gr09); K/L=5.9 {I2} (1965Bo34). 
MR$from L subshell ratios; sign from nuclear orientation (1972Kr18). Other values: -0.16 {I3} (|g|g(|q), 1972Ag03); -0.19 {I3} (nuclear orientation, 1972Kr18); 1965Ag02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.68 {I9} (Ice(K) from 1961Ar15); L1:L2:L3=10:41 {I5}:39 {I5} (the L2 and L3 values were inverted in 1972Gr09, but subsequently corrected in a private communication from authors); K:L:M=1.6 {I2}:1.7 {I2}:0.44 {I5} (1961Ar15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
TI$from |S(I(|g+ce)) to 129.0 level less I(|g+ce)(124.0|g) (1961Ar15 determined absence of measurable |b{+-} feeding to either the 116.7 or 129.0 levels). 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
$M1:M2:M3=100:17 {I2}:8.3 {I16}; M:N:O=100:25 {I3}:4 {I1} (1965Bo34). 
MR$deduced from subshell ratios using BrIccMixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.55 {I6} (Ice(K) from 1961Ar15); L1:L2:L3=10:45 {I4}:37 {I3} (the L2 and L3 values were inverted in 1972Gr09, but subsequently corrected in a private communication from authors); K:L:M=5.1 {I5}:5.0 {I5}:1.7 {I2} (1961Ar15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$See comment with 308.3|g. 
$|a(K)exp=0.0186 {I8}; L1:L2:L3=100:9.3 {I7}:9.8 {I6}; K:L:M=0.56 {I2}:0.071 {I5}:0.019 {I2} (1961Ar15). 
M,MR$1972Kr18 report |d(E1,M2)=0.00 {I3} (nuclear orientation). Other data: A{-2}=+0.177 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.036 {I14}, |d(D,Q)=+0.07 {I3} for 296|g-124|g(|q) (1978Ba03); 1965Ag02 (|g's only partially resolved). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)=0.0161 (E1 value from theory used for normalizing the ce and |g intensity scales; 1972Gr09 increased |a(K) from 0.0152 (Hager-Seltzer) to 0.0161 to correct for penetration contribution evidenced by abnormal L subshell ratios for 295.9|g and 308.3|g). 
$L1:L2:L3=100:10.3 {I3}:11.1 {I9}; K:L:M=1.06 {I4}:0.144 {I7}:0.033 {I7} (1961Ar15). 
M$1972Kr18 report |d(E1,M2)=-0.17 {I11} (nuclear orientation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.019 {I2}. 
MR$deduced from |a(exp) and |d of 1972Kr18 using BrIccMixing program. Sign from 1972Kr18. Other: -0.06 {I10} (1972Kr18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(608.6|g+609.0|g)=0.027 {I5}. 
RI$from coincidence data; I|g(exp)=0.470 {I26} for 608.6|g and 609.0|g combined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.168 {I9}; K/L>6 (1961Ar15). 
M$|a(K)exp more consistent with M1 than M1+E2, but |g|g(|q) data imply an E2 admixture. 
MR$from A{-2}=+0.102 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.029 {I34} for 277|g-210|g(|q) (1978Ba03). Other data: |d=-0.37 {I7} (nuclear orientation, 1972Kr18); A{-2}=+0.124 {I5}, |d=-0.336 {I+7-2} if |d(D,Q)<0.025 for 210|g (277|g-210|g(|q), 1975Go06); A{-2}=+0.140 {I11} if attenuation is 0.85 {I5}, |d=-0.360 {I17} (|g-210|g(|q), 1976Pa16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I7}. 
MR$from nuclear orientation (1972Kr18). Other value: +0.06 {I4} (|g|g(|q) (1972Be85)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp=0.15 {I5} ((Ice(L) from 1961Ar15); L1:L2:L3=100:18 {I6}:19 {I6} (1972Gr09). 
MR$deduced from ce and subshell ratios using BrIccMixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(869.7|g+871.5|g)=0.0076 {I23}. 
M$uncertain because of interference from 871.5|g. 
MR$from nuclear orientation (1972Kr18); value subject to undetermined correction due to interference from 871.5|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.068 {I7}; K/L|?2 (1961Ar15; value not consistent with assigned multipolarity (K/L|?7 for M1, |?4 for E2)). 
MR$from nuclear orientation (1972Kr18). Other data: |d=+0.18 {I5} (|g|g(|q), 1972Be85); A{-2}=+0.018 {I12}, |d=+0.33 {I4} (|g-277|g(|q) if |d(277|g)=-0.34 {I2}, 1975Go06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Second placement reported in |g-ray table (838.3 level to 561.4 level), but neither initial nor final state is shown on drawing. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Second placement reported in |g-ray table (779.1 level to 481.0 level), but neither initial nor final state is shown on drawing. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$L1:L2:L3=0.6:0.24:0.38. |a(L1)exp=1.3 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.49 {I11}, |a(L3)exp=0.77 {I17} (1972Ba01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.052 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0069 {I15}, |a(M)exp=0.0029 {I5} (1972Ba01). |a(K)exp=0.027, |a(L)exp=0.0037 (1965Ha24). |a(K)exp|?0.12 (1961He10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 38.69 {I6} (1976MeZC) and 38.63 {I5} (1972Ba01) 
M,MR$L1:L2:L3:M=|?0.15:0.53:0.78:0.44. |a(L1)exp|?8.6, |a(L2)exp=31, |a(L3)exp=46 {I15}, |a(M)exp=26. |d is based on assigned uncertainty of 50% on Ice values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.063 {I14} (1972Ba01) gives M1(+E2) with |d<0.9; but |a(K)exp=0.028, |a(L)exp=0.0066 (1965Ha24) suggest E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.049 {I11} (1972Ba01) gives M1(+E2) with |d<0.5; but |a(K)exp=0.021, |a(L)exp=0.0044 (1965Ha24) suggest E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 29.42 {I5} (1974MeZS) and 29.32 {I5} (1972Ba01) 
M$|a(L2)exp=228 {I70}, |a(L3)exp=275 {I90}, |a(M2)exp+|a(M3)exp=140 {I45}, |a(N)exp=39 {I12} (1972Ba01). |d(E2/M1)>1.7. |a(L)exp=395 (1965Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1=63.2:6.7:0.61:0.22:2.2. |d(E2/M1)=0.05 {I2} from L-subshell ratios. |a(K)=8.08, |a(L1)exp=0.86 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.078 {I18}, |a(L3)exp=0.028 {I6}, |a(M1)exp=0.28 {I6} (1972Ba01). Ice(K) for 68|g (mult=M1 as given by subshell ratios) is used for normalization of ce data for other transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:M1:N1=8.3:0.56:1.6:0.38. |a(L1)exp=1.3 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.087 {I20}, |a(M1)exp=0.26 {I6}, |a(N1)exp=0.059 {I13} (1972Ba01). |a(L)exp=1.5 (1965Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced from energy difference between 116.14|g and 118.6|g. 
TI$deduced from intensity balance at 2.5 level (no direct |b{+-} feeding for decay to g.s. band (|DK=3)). 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
%I|g=46.6 {I24} 
M$deduced from |a(total)=0.09 {I17}, required by decay-scheme intensity balance; |a(K)exp<0.9 is consistent with E1, but does not rule out M1 and/or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1, M1, or E2 from |a(total)=0.31 {I20}. Decay scheme requires E1. Intensity balance; |a(K)exp<0.9 is consistent with E1, but does not rule out M1 and/or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp) gives M1 or E2; M1 preferred since 8+ state (required by E2) is not expected below 1 MeV excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
M$ M1 cannot be ruled out from |a(expt), but E1 is preferred from assigned spins and parities of levels involved 
TI$ inferred from intensity balances. 
$If 37|g is M1, B(M1)=2.2|*10{+-7} {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E deduced from ce(L) and ce(M) peaks (1995Ni10) 
M$|a(exp)>23 (1995Ni10) from the ce intensities and an upper limit on I|g. This limit rules out E1 and M1. RUL limits mult to Q, and systematics suggest that mult=E2 is more likely than mult=M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From |a{-K}(exp)=1.3 {I3}. Value determined from the intensity of the Yb K x rays relative to I|g(96.8) measured in coincidence with positrons in the {+154}Lu |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From |a{-K}(exp)=1.3 {I3}, from intensity of Yb K x rays relative to I|g(96.8) measured in coincidence with positrons in the {+154}Lu |e decay (1988Vi02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M 1993Zh10 indicate that mult=M1 is measured for this |g, but do not present the data from which this conclusion is drawn. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$See the discussion of the |d value for this transition in the high-spin data set. 
CC$Value for a pure E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 3027.3 level. 
MR$From |g(|q) and intensity balance, 1981Li09 deduce |d=-0.07~{I4}. However, the implied B(M2)(W.u.) value exceeds RUL for M2 transitions. From RUL, the magnitude of |d should be <0.004. 
CC$Value for a pure E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+160}Lu |e decay 
M$E2 based on DCO (2019Ma70) contradicts E1 based on |a(K)exp (1984Au13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+160}Lu |e decay 
M$contradictory assignments: M1+E2 (2019Ma70) versus E1 (2019Sa61 and 1984Au13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 adopted by 2019Ma70 in (HI,xn|g) dataset based on DCO which however based on polarization better fits E1(+M2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$A{-p}=0.17 {I40} (2019Ma70) 
M$electric character based on polarization adopted by 2019Ma70 in (HI,xn|g) dataset as E2 which however does not exclude E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$482.7|g and 902.9|g decaying from 2051, (6)- level are the same as 484|g and 903.6|g and decaying from 2051, (6)- level but placed in different bands by different autors (see comments on respective levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 adopted by 2019Ma70 in (HI,xn|g) dataset based on polarization which however does not exclude E1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1983Ge08. |g not reported by 1984Au13. 
RI normalized to I|g(1292.7) using the relative I|g values reported by 1983Ge08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$mean value of 395.6 {I1} (2019Sa61) and 395.39 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
$DCO(Q)=1.04 {I3}, IPDCO=+0.10 {I3}, R(|q)=2.45 {I6} (2019Sa61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 509.2 {I1} (2019Sa61) and 508.73 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
$DCO(Q)=0.89 {I6}, IPDCO=+0.09 {I3} (2019Sa61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=1.02 {I9} (2019Ma70) 
M$Q,E2 based on DCO (2019Ma70) contradicts E1 based on |a(K)exp (1984Au13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=0.78 {I7}, A{-p}=-0.15 {I12} (2019Ma70) 
$DCO(Q)=0.56 {I15}, IPDCO=+0.25 {I18}, R(|q)=1.21 {I13} (2019Sa61) 
M$contradictory assignments: M1+E2 (2019Ma70) versus E1 (2019Sa61). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$A{-p}=-0.20 {I27} (2019Ma70) 
M$2019Ma70 adopted electric character based on polarization measurement there is no proof that this is a |DJ=2 Q transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this transition is expected but unobserved by 2010Ba02 and remains unobserved by 2019Sa61 as well 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=0.98 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
M$M1+E2 adopted by 2019Ma70 based on DCO which however better fits Q,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=0.58 {I5}, A{-p}=0.24 {I8} (2019Ma70) 
M$M1+E2 adopted by 2019Ma70 based on DCO which however based on polarization better fits E1(+M2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 589.5 {I1} (2019Sa61) and 589.27 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
$DCO(Q)=1.04 {I9}, IPDCO=+0.10 {I1}, R(|q)=2.34 {I4} (2019Sa61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=0.72 {I6} (2019Ma70) 
M$M1+E2 adopted by 2019Ma70 based on DCO which however better fits D(+Q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$A{-p}=0.17 {I40} (2019Ma70) 
M$electric character based on polarization adopted by 2019Ma70 as E2 which however does not exclude E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$483|g and 903|g decaying from 2050, (6-) level are the same as 484|g and 903.6|g and decaying from 2051, (6)- level but placed in different bands by different autors (see comments on respective levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$A{-p}=0.44 {I15} 
M$M1+E2 adopted by 2019Ma70 based on polarization which however does not exclude E1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
$DCO(Q)=0.49 {I7}, IPDCO=+0.11 {I9}, R(|q)=1.20 {I5} (2019Sa61) 
MR from measured quadrupole content of |?96% (1980Ri02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 637.5 {I1} (2019Sa61) and 637.03 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
$DCO(Q)=0.82 {I9}, IPDCO=+0.13 {I5} (2019Sa61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 404.2 {I1} (2019Sa61) and 404.02 {I10} (2019Ma70) 
$DCO(Q)=1.04 {I3}, IPDCO=+0.08 {I4}, R(|q)=2.51 {I12} (2019Sa61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(256.4|g)/I|g(414.5|g)=0.49 {i12} (1982Ch12). 
E value reported by 1980Ri08. 1990TeZW show this |g in their level scheme, but do not give an energy for it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(653.9|g)/I|g(414.5|g)=0.72 {i15} (1982Ch12). 
E value reported by 1980Ri08. 1990TeZW show this |g in their level scheme, but do not give an energy for it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g(788.9|g)/I|g(532.8|g)=0.49 {i9} (1982Ch12). 
E value reported by 1982Ch12. 1990TeZW show this |g in their level scheme, but do not give an energy for it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E 1980Ri08 report E|g=759.5 and 1983HaYY report E|g=767 for the transition assigned to connect these two states. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E 1980Ri08 report E|g=850 and 1983HaYY report E|g=855 for the transition assigned to connect these two states. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) (1980BeYG), R{-DCO} and A{-P} (2018Md01) in {+150}Sm({+16}O,4n|g). See the comment in the (HI,xn|g) data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M mult=Q from |g|g(|q) in {+162}Lu |e decay (1983Ge08). From the observed |g decay from this level, the evaluator has concluded that the deexciting |g's are much more reasonably assigned as E2 than M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M mult=Q, from |g|g(|q) in {+162}Lu |e decay (1983Ge08). The evaluator has regarded mult=E2 to be a more reasonable choice than the alternative, mult=M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$observed 945 keV peak in electron spectra corresponding to K ce of 1006, E0, 0+ to 0+ |g transition (2013Bl07, |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$(E2+M1) assigned from |a(K)exp; however value is considerably larger than that predicted for E2+M1 transition, which could indicate an E0 contribution. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 8.4 ps {I27} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 5.7 ps {I7} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 4.6 ps {I7} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 2.2 ps {I3} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 32.6 ps {I47} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 8.4 ps {I12} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W computed by the evaluator from the partial lifetime of 12.0 ps {I28} reported by 1992Mc02 for this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI the split in the intensity of this doubly placed transition is that given by 1992Mc02. 1987Mo21 report I(|g+ce)=152 for the doublet. 
$R{-DCO}=1.009 {I6}, A{-P}=0.119 {I10} (2018Md01) 
M$from 1980BeYG, |g(|q), mult=Q; E2 from 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.084 {I7}, A{-P}=0.134 {I10} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp, mult=E2 for the 519.8, 521.4 doublet (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 
TI 1987Mo21 report I(|g+ce)=108 for the 519.8, 521.4 pair of |g rays. The split in intensity between these two |g's is that given by 1992Mc02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=0.947 {I48}, A{-P}=0.171 {I114} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.042 {I2} (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=0.915 {I19}, A{-P}=0.164 {I13} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01. 1980BeYG report |a(K)exp=0.095 {I3}, which the evaluator assumes is a misprint and should be 0.0095 {I3}. For mult=E2, |a(K)=0.0100, for mult=M1, |a(K)=0.0243 and for mult=M2, |a(K)=0.0695. From |g(|q) given by 1980BeYG, mult can be Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=0.567 {I35}, A{-P}=0.061 {I59} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I2} (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=0.944 {I26}, A{-P}=0.195 {I68} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp>0.06 (1980BeYG). |a(K)=0.0084 for E1 and |a(K)=0.0245 for E2. From DCO, 1987Mo21 report mult=E2/M1. 2018Md01 also reported M1, although based on their R{-DCO} and A{-P} values this would be rather an E2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.010 {I13}, A{-P}=0.068 {I32} (2018Md01) 
M 1980BeYG report |a(K)exp=0.021 {I1} for this doublet. |a(K)=0.0180 and 0.0458 for E2 and M1, respectively. 1987Mo21 conclude that both members of the doublet are E2; and the |a(K)exp value is consistent with this, although some admixture of M1 is not excluded by the data. E2 is confirmed by 2018Md01 
TI the split in intensity of this doubly placed transition is that given by 1992Mc02. 1987Mo21 report I(|g+ce)=46.5 {I9} for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.089 {I10}, A{-P}=0.112 {I17} (2018Md01) 
M$|g(|q) (1980BeYG) indicates mult=Q. |a(K)exp=0.005 for the 607.4,610.2 pair of transitions (1980BeYG) rules out M2. E2 is confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-P}=0.036 {I36} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.015 {I1} (1980BeYG); electric character confirmed by (2018Md01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) (1980BeYG), mult=Q. The evaluator has regarded M2 as unlikely. See the comment for the other member of this doublet (the 4+ to 2+ transition within the g.s. band). 
TI the split in intensity of this doubly placed transition is that given by 1992Mc02. 1987Mo21 report I(|g+ce)=152 for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.115 {I12}, A{-P}=0.151 {I28} (2018Md01) 
M$|g(|q) indicates mult=Q for the 621.2, 623.0 doublet (1980BeYG). Both 1980BeYG and 1987Mo21 assign both transitions as E2, which is confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.102 {I12}, A{-P}=0.184 {I58} (2018Md01) 
M$1980BeYG report |a(K)exp=0.021 {I1} for this doublet. |a(K)=0.0180 and 0.0458 for E2 and M1, respectively. 1987Mo21 conclude that both members of the doublet are E2; and the |a(K)exp value is consistent with this, although some admixture of M1 is not excluded by the data. E2 is confirmed by 2018Md01 
TI the split in intensity of this doubly placed transition is that given by 1992Mc02. 1987Mo21 report I(|g+ce)=46.5 {I9} for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.011 {I6}, A{-P}=0.054 {I12} (2018Md01) 
TI$1987Mo21 report I(|g+ce)=108 for the 519.8, 521.4 pair of |g rays. The split in intensity between these two |g's is that given by 1992Mc02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.184 {I17}, A{-P}=0.136 {I20} (2018Md01) 
M |g(|q) indicates mult=Q for the 621.2, 623.0 doublet (1980BeYG). Both 1980BeYG and 1987Mo21 assign both transitions as E2, confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.017 {I23}, A{-P}=0.194 {I18} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I1} (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.112 {I10}, A{-P}=0.199 {I68} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.012 {I4} (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.073 {I38}, A{-P}=0.075 {I23} (2018Md01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0089 {I4} for the 588.4,589.9 doublet (1980BeYG) is consistent with mult=E2 for both transitions. DCO and |g(|q) for each transition indicate mult=Q. E2 is confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=0.930 {I10}, A{-P}=0.185 {I65} (2018Md01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0089 {I4} for the 588.4,589.9 doublet (1980BeYG) is consistent with mult=E2 for both transitions. DCO and |g(|q) for each transition indicate mult=Q. E2 is confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.025 {I36}, A{-P}=0.146 {I37} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0090 {I15} (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.110 {I16}, A{-P}=0.175 {I71} (2018Md01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0083 {I10} (1980BeYG), confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=1.089 {I22}, A{-P}=0.069 {I48} (2018Md01) 
M$DCO ratio indicates mult=Q. |a(K)exp=0.0096 {I1} for the 646.8, 649.4 pair of |g's (1980BeYG) makes M2 unlikely. E2 is confirmed by 2018Md01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 22.30 {I26} (2004Mc01) and 22.55 {I44} (2013Bl07) 
EKC$0.0104 {I9} (2013Bl07, from 1m20 spectra only) 
M$|DJ=0, E2 from |a(K)exp (2013Bl07); possible |DJ=0, M1+E2 with |d=2.0 {I+6-4} deduced from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 14.28 {I23} (2004Mc01) and 14.21 {I28} (2013Bl07) 
EKC$0.0047 {I3} (2013Bl07) 
M$from |a(K)exp (2013Bl07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 11.6 {I3} (2004Mc01) and 11.74 {I23} (2013Bl07) 
EKC$0.0060 {I5} (2013Bl07, weighted average of 1m20 and 1m values with 20m value excluded as outlier) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp (2013Bl07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 3.27 {I14} (2004Mc01) and 3.2 {I3} (2013Bl07, from 1m20 only) 
M from 1983Ge08, |g|g(|q). These data indicate a 0|)2|)0 |g cascade, with both transitions having mult=Q. The evaluator has considered mult=E2 for the initial transition to be more reasonable than the alternative, M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$observed 945 keV peak in electron spectra corresponding to K ce of 1006, E0, 0+ to 0+ |g transition (2013Bl07) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.078 {I22} for E0, 1006 |g and E2, 839.4 |g transitions, respectively; weighted average of 2013Bl07 values: 0.083 {I42} (method A, 1m20 spectra), 0.075 {I40} (method B, 1m20 spectra), 0.080 {I42} (method C, 1m20 spectra), and 0.072 {I71} (method A, 1m spectra). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 2.65 {I14} (2004Mc01) and 3.21 {I18} (2013Bl07) 
EKC$0.037 {I4} (2013Bl07) 
ELC$0.0076 {I13} (2013Bl07) 
M$(E2+M1) assigned in 2013Bl07, however |a(K)exp is considerably larger than that predicted for E2+M1 transition, which could indicate an E0 contribution. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 3.58 {I22} (2004Mc01) and 3.9 {I5} (2013Bl07, weighted average of 1m20 and 1m values) 
EKC$0.0026 {I5} (2013Bl07, from 1m spectra only) 
M$from |a(K)exp (by evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 4.88 {I18} (2004Mc01) and 5.38 {I36} (2013Bl07, weighted average of 1m20 and 1m values) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 4.59 {I18} (2004Mc01) and 5.45 {I33} (2013Bl07, weighted average of 1m20 and 1m values) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 5.43 {I19} (2004Mc01) and 5.63 {I34} (2013Bl07, weighted average of 1m20 and 1m values) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$7.8 for a 395|g (1983Ge08) 
$A 395|g placed from a 450 level and a 400|g placed from a 772 level in 1983Ge08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$divided on the basis of I|g(483|g)=6.4 and I|g(484|g)=19.2 (1983Ge08). 
$|g placed from 538 level only by 1980Be39, unplaced in 1980AdZU, probable doublet from 1983Ge08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from |e decay and its appearance in 370|g-gated spectrum (figure 1 of 1983Ko05). Level-energy difference=74.4. E|g=75.0 in {+163}Lu |e decay 
RI$from adopted branching ratios and I|g(78.6|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.12 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I20} 
M$from |g(|q). |d=0.46 {I13} from K/L=0.5 {I1} (1979Ri06). But K/L may be contaminated by ce(73|g)'s (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g to 4+ implies mult=M2, reported in {+152}Sm({+16}O,4n|g) (1995No04), not in {+124}Sn({+44}Ca,4n|g) (1996Xi01); treated as questionable by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 202.5 {I5} from ({+40}Ar,5n|g) and 202.1 {I2} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 51 {I5} from ({+40}Ar,5n|g) and 55 {I6} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from ({+40}Ar,5n|g). Other: 209.5 {I2} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
RI$from ({+40}Ar,5n|g). Other: 100 {I10} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 274.6 {I5} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 11.0 {I10} from ({+40}Ar,5n|g) and 7.9 {I17} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 804.2 {I5} from ({+40}Ar,5n|g) and 804.6 {I5} from ({+17}O,4n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) and ce data in ({+17}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=87.57 {I17}, I|g=24.8 {I25} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=87.4 {I2}, I|g=11.4 {I16} (1978Bu13) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=30 {I6}:3.0 {I15}:30 {I6}:30 {I2}:7 {I2}:7 {I2} (1980AdZP) 
M,MR$from the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset. Others: |d(E2/M1)|>2.8 from data for K, L1, L2, L3, M2 and M3 shells, and using BrIccMixing code; |<15% M1, or |d(E2/M1)|>2.4 (1980AdZP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=120.68 {I15}, I|g=100 (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=120.58 {I5}, I|g=100 (1973Me25) 
$E|g=120.2 {I2}, I|g=100 {I7} (1978Bu13) 
$Ice(K)=156 {I31} and 158 {I32} (1980AdZP) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1=156 {I31}:22 {I5}:3.0 {I15}:0.9 {I5}:5.0 {I25} (1980AdZP) 
$|d(E2/M1)=0.7 {I+4-2} using data for K, L1, L2, L3 and M1 shells, but reduced |h{+2} is large. Using only the data for L1, L2 and L3 shells, |d(E2/M1)=0.16 {I+8-5}, closer to the values of |<0.18 listed by 1980AdZP 
$|a(K)(120.6|g,M1(+E2),|d|<0.18)=1.56 were used for normalization of |a(K)exp values in 1980AdZP. Here evaluators use |a(K)(120.6|g)=1.63 {I4} for |d(E2/M1)(120.6)=0.16 {I+8-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=132.50 {I10}, I|g=84 {I9} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=132.43 {I10}, I|g=92 {I5} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=132.0 {I2}, I|g=84.9 {I64} (1978Bu13, placed from a 252 level) 
$Ice(K)=12 {I3} and 10 {I2} (1980AdZP) 
$K/L1=5.7 {I12} in earlier evaluations not found in 1980AdZP 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1982Ra19; |g not listed in 1980AdZP, although, observed as an L-shell conversion line 
$Ice(L)=15 {I3} (1980AdZP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=174.30 {I30}, I|g=40 {I8} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=174.22 {I10}, I|g=50 {I5} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=173.7 {I2}, I|g=38.4 {I59} (1978Bu13, placed from a 426 level) 
$|d(E2/M1) from K, L, L1 and L2 electron data. 1980AdZP give |<15% E2 or |d(E2/M1)|<0.42 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced |g from 1973Me25 only, |g not reported in 1980AdZP and 1982Ra19. Tentative placement suggested in 1987Pe01 evaluation based on level-energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=203.61 {I10}, I|g=28.2 {I33} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=203.58 {I5}, I|g=42 {I5} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=203.0 {I2}, I|g=51.5 {I37} (1978Bu13, unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=324.03 {I34}, I|g=6.1 {I10} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=324.70 {I20}, I|g=5.0 {I5} (1973Me25) 
$Ice(K)=0.2 {I1} and 0.50 {I25} (1980AdZP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=217.33 {I10}, I|g=16.1 {I17} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=217.40 {I5}, I|g=19 {I2} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=216.6 {I2}, I|g=26.7 {I22} (1978Bu13, placed from a 643 level) 
$Ice(K)|>2 and 5.9 {I12} (1980AdZP) 
$|d(E2/M1)<0.75 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)<0.75 
$E|g=270.73 {I15}, I|g=19.7 {I17} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=271.03 {I6}, I|g=20.5 {I15} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=270.4 {I2}, I|g=18.4 {I13} (1978Bu13, unplaced) 
$Ice(K)|>1.2 and 4.5 {I22} (1980AdZP) 
$|d(E2/M1)<1.0 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=253.61 {I15}, I|g=16.8 {I25} (1982Ra19) 
$E|g=253.44 {I10}, I|g=16 {I2} (1973Me25) 
$E|g=252.2 {I2}, I|g=15.3 {I13} (1978Bu13, placed from a 252 level) 
$Ice(K)=1.5 {I7} and 5.0 {I25} (1980AdZP) 
$|a(K)exp values overlap M1 and E2 


