# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2192.5 {I5} (1969Li10), 2192.6 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2192.58 {I16} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 2193 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.132 {I23} (1989Si17), 0.073 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.093 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 460.97 {I24} (1982Ak03), 460.9 {I5} (1989Si17) and 461.09 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.078 {I13} (1982Ak03), 0.085 {I21} (1989Si17), 0.14 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.10 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 474.6 {I3} (1969Li10), 474.46 {I17} (1982Ak03), 474.38 {I10} (1989Si17) and 474.44 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.23 {I4} (1982Ak03), 0.26 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.22 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.190 {I20} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 542.97 {I24} (1982Ak03), 543.4 {I5} (1989Si17) and 542.78 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.14 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.183 {I19} (1989Si17), 0.13 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.27 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 660.74 {I24} (1982Ak03), 661.4 {I6} (1989Si17) and 660.89 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.077 {I13} (1982Ak03), 0.09 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.11 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.120 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 787.85 {I30} (1982Ak03), 789.0 {I5} (1989Si17) and 788.2 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.057 {I14} (1982Ak03), 0.026 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.041 {I8} (1994Mo06) and 0.020 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 826 {I1} (1969Li10), 826.40 {I19} (1982Ak03), 826.2 {I3} (1989Si17) and 826.44 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.29 {I4} (1982Ak03), 0.200 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.28 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.29 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1594.8 {I4} (1969Li10), 1594.73 {I8} (1989Si17) and 1594.80 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1595 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.58 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.61 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.63 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2204.3 {I3} (1969Li10), 2204.12 {I7} (1989Si17), 2204.215 {I40} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 2204.051 {I23} (2002MoZP). Other: 2204 {I2} (1967Bu17) and 2204 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I3} (1960Lu07); other: 0.0026 (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 10.83 {I19} (1989Si17), 11.02 {I9} (1994Mo06), 10.89 {I24} (1998Mo14), 11.1 {I3} (2000Sa32), 10.75 {I9} (2002MoZP) and 10.76 {I5} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 547.05 {I17} (1982Ak03), 547.1 {I3} (1989Si17), 547.61 {I24} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.08 {I1} (1982Ak03), 0.070 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.074 {I7} (2000Sa32); other: <0.008 (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 934.0 {I5} (1989Si17) and 934.10 {I20} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1989Si17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1599.5 {I4} (1969Li10), 1599.3 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1599.58 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.27 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I6} (1989Si17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.72 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.72 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.73 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 501.96 {I20} (1982Ak03), 502.2 {I6} (1989Si17) and 501.96 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.041 {I7} (1982Ak03), 0.039 {I9} (1989Si17), 0.040 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.035 {I19} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 536.6 {I8} (1969Li10), 536.83 {I19} (1982Ak03), 536.94 {I20} (1989Si17) and 536.77 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.14 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.154 {I19} (1989Si17), 0.14 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.12 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 722.93 {I19} (1982Ak03), 723.4 {I3} (1989Si17) and 722.98 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I4} (1960Lu07) 
RI$weighted average of 0.075 {I11} (1982Ak03), 0.10 {I5} (1989Si17), 0.073 {I9} (1994Mo06) and 0.107 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 991.83 {I36} (1982Ak03) and 991.49 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.015 {I7} (1982Ak03), 0.022 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 0.050 {I22} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1657.4 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1657.00 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I7} (1989Si17), 0.10 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.14 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2266.4 {I6} (1969Li10), 2266.6 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2266.51 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.038 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.037 {I2} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 0.034 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average 877.91 {I36} (1982Ak03) and 878.03 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.022 {I7} (1982Ak03) and 0.026 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 915.68 {I24} (1982Ak03), 915.8 {I4} (1989Si17) and 915.74 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.070 {I14} (1982Ak03), 0.049 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.065 {I8} (1994Mo06) and 0.043 {I6} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1684.1 {I3} (1969Li10), 1683.99 {I4} (1989Si17), 1683.96 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1684.020 {I23} (2002MoZP). Other: 1685 {I6} (1967Bu17) and 1685 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.51 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.49 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.43 {I4} (2000Sa32); other: 1.556 {I13} (2002MoZP). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2293.7 {I3} (1969Li10), 2293.36 {I12} (1989Si17), 2293.45 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 2293.37 {I3} (2002MoZP). Other: 2292 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 2293 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.70 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.67 {I3} (1994Mo06), 0.72 {I6} (2000Sa32) and 0.677 {I10} (2002MoZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1752 {I1} (1989Si17) and 1751.44 {I74} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.017 {I9} (1989Si17) and 0.002 {I1} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2360.9 {I6} (1989Si17) and 2361.00 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0041 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.0033 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.0060 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 334.87 {I19} (1982Ak03) and 334.78 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.072 {I14} (1982Ak03), 0.066 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 0.090 {I17} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 658.61 {I24} (1982Ak03), 658.8 {I5} (1989Si17) and 658.86 {I21} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.037 {I8} (1982Ak03), 0.019 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.046 {I8} (1994Mo06) and 0.030 {I8} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 693.3 {I8} (1969Li10), 693.00 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 693.3 {I5} (1989Si17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.012 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.013 {I6} (1989Si17) and 0.012 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1045.4 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1045.76 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.029 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.051 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.037 {I20} (2000Sa32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1813.7 {I4} (1989Si17) and 1813.73 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.026 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.024 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.020 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2423.7 {I6} (1969Li10), 2423.5 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2423.27 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.013 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.010 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.018 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 452.88 {I20} (1982Ak03) and 452.92 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.068 {I11} (1982Ak03) and 0.067 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 683.3 {I5} (1969Li10), 683.13 {I17} (1982Ak03), 683.22 {I6} (1989Si17) and 683.2 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.18 {I3} (1982Ak03), 0.171 {I19} (1989Si17), 0.18 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.190 {I20} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 704.9 {I5} (1989Si17) and 704.97 {I25} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.094 {I21} (1989Si17), 0.11 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.113 {I29} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 786.1 {I4} (1969Li10), 786.1 {I4} (1989Si17) and 786.43 {I16} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.68 {20} (1989Si17) and 0.70 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 904.1 {I5} (1969Li10), 904.30 {I17} (1982Ak03), 904.25 {I25} (1989Si17) and 904.38 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.15 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.23 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.14 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.16 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1032.5 {I6} (1969Li10), 1032.37 {I8} (1989Si17) and 1032.46 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.21 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.13 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.17 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1070.0 {I3} (1969Li10), 1069.96 {I8} (1989Si17) and 1070.01 {I16} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.62 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.56 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.65 {I6} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1172.9 {I6} (1969Li10), 1173.05 {I10} (1989Si17) and 1172.90 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.098 {I12} (1994Mo06) and 0.132 {I9} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1838.6 {I3} (1969Li10), 1838.36 {I5} (1989Si17) and 1838.33 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.83 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.74 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.77 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2448.0 {I3} (1969Li10), 2447.71 {I10} (1989Si17), 2447.860 {I100} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 2447.67 {I3} (2002MoZP). Other: 2448 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 3.37 {I4} (1989Si17), 3.42 {I3} (1994Mo06), 3.46 {I9} (1998Mo14), 3.30 {I10} (2000Sa32), 3.41 {I4} (2002MoZP) and 3.40 {I2} (2004Mo07). 
M$from |a(K)exp|?0.0004 (1960Lu07) and |a(K)exp|?0.0003 (1967Ma51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 273.5 {I5} (1969Li10), 273.76 {I24} (1982Ak03), 273.7 {I4} (1989Si17) and 273.80 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.25 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.38 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.27 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.29 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 394.00 {I19} (1982Ak03), 394.0 {I10} (1989Si17) and 394.05 {I8} (1993Di09). 
RI$weighted average of 0.033 {I4} (1982Ak03), 0.019 {I8} (1989Si17), 0.024 {I3} (2000Sa32) and 0.032 {I3} (1993Di09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 487.25 {I20} (1969Li10) and 487.95 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 634.84 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 634.72 {I21} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1994Mo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 753.0 {I3} (1969Li10), 752.84 {I17} (1982Ak03), 752.84 {I3} (1989Si17) and 752.86 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.30 {I4} (1982Ak03), 0.29 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.28 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.28 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 821.2 {I3} (1969Li10), 821.17 {I17} (1982Ak03), 821.18 {I3} (1989Si17) and 821.19 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 821.7 {I10} (1967Ma51) and 825 {I5} (1967Bu17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.37 {I6} (1982Ak03), 0.33 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.36 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.37 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1104.0 {I4} (1969Li10), 1104.8 {I3} (1989Si17) and 1104.79 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.17 {I1} (1989Si17), 0.16 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.16 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1207.8 {I3} (1969Li10), 1207.68 {I3} (1989Si17) and 1207.72 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1207.8 {I8} (1967Ma51) and 1208 {I2} (1967Bu17). 
RI$weighted average of 1.00 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.98 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 1.04 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1873.4 {I3} (1969Li10), 1873.16 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1873.10 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1873 {I2} (1967Bu17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.49 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.46 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.51 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2482.8 {I4} (1989Si17) and 2482.7 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 2482 {I3} (1967Bu17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0043 {I19} (1989Si17) and 0.0021 {I4} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 961.84 {I36} (1982Ak03), 962 {I1} (1989Si17) and 961.61 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.046 {I12} (1982Ak03), 0.021 {I10} (1989Si17), 0.03 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.022 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1230.5 {I10} (1989Si17) and 1230.65 {I38} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.047 {I24} (1989Si17), 0.015 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.08 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1896.7 {I4} (1969Li10), 1896.3 {I3} (1989Si17) and 1895.92 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1896 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.38 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.31 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.35 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2505.6 {I4} (1969Li10), 2505.6 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2505.39 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 2505 {I3} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0128 {I21} (1989Si17), 0.012 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.025 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 304.05 {I4} (1982Ak03) and 303.97 {I3} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 0.069 {I15} (1982Ak03), 0.055 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 0.065 {I20} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 496.88 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 496.90 {I18} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1982Ak03, 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Si17. 
$Placement from 965|g and 934|g coincidence (1989Si17). Possible placement between the 2694- and 1729-keV levels from the energy fit (1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.021 {I10} (1989Si17) and 0.024 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1130.8 {I4} (1989Si17) and 1130.29 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.10 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.078 {I9} (1994Mo06) and 0.080 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1898.7 {I4} (1989Si17) and 1898.68 {I16} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.14 {I5} (1989Si17), 0.11 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.10 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1166.9 {I10} (1989Si17) and 1167.27 {I18} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.026 {I9} (1989Si17), 0.027 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.028 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1935.8 {I4} (1989Si17) and 1935.52 {I20} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06; others: 0.11 {I5} (1989Si17) and 0.16 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 396.3 {I6} (1969Li10), 396.05 {I17} (1982Ak03), 396.01 {I12} (1989Si17) and 396.01 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.060 {I9} (1982Ak03), 0.066 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.059 {I7} (1993Di09) and 0.053 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 943.31 {I20} (1982Ak03), 943.3 {I4} (1989Si17) and 943.34 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.034 {I8} (1982Ak03), 0.036 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.037 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.050 {I26} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1330.0 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1329.93 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.024 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.026 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.039 {I17} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1994.7 {I15} (1969Li10), 1994.7 {I15} (1989Si17) and 1994.6 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.013 {I7} (1989Si17) and 0.020 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2604.5 {I10} (1989Si17) and 2604.5 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0010 {I3} (1989Si17) and 0.0008 {I2} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2021.8 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2021.47 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.041 {I16} (1989Si17), 0.045 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.057 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2630.9 {I5} (1989Si17) and 2630.90 {I28} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0021 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.0018 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.0050 {I17} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 949.81 {I36} (1982Ak03) and 949.83 {I50} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.009 {I6} (1982Ak03) and 0.012 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2053.2 {I3} (1969Li10), 2052.94 {I15} and 2052.94 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.151 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.15 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.16 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2662.0 {I10} and 2662.6 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0010 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.0006 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.0004 {I1} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 485.95 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 485.92 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.052 {I11} (1982Ak03) and 0.048 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 677.41 {I21} (1982Ak03) and 677.41 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1982Ak03, 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 699.94 {I27} (1982Ak03) and 699.82 {I18} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.044 {I9} (1982Ak03) and 0.035 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 847.07 {I19} (1982Ak03) and 847.16 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.052 {I12} (1982Ak03), 0.057 {I7} (1994Mo06) and 0.053 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 930.5 {I5} (1989Si17) and 930.15 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.043 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.10 {I2} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 0.08 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1033.2 {I10} (1989Si17) and 1033.31 {I18} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.051 {I13} (1989Si17) and 0.043 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1317.1 {I3} (1969Li10), 1316.96 {I15} (1989Si17) and 1316.99 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.19 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.16 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.20 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1419.7 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1419.70 {I29} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.011 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.011 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.013 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2084.2 {I12} (1969Li10), 2085.0 {I5} (1989Si17) and 2085.22 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.021 {I6} (1989Si17) and 0.018 {I1} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2695.1 {I4} (1969Li10), 2694.8 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2694.55 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.070 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.066 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.062 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 494.31 {I20} (1982Ak03), 494.6 {I10} (1989Si17) and 494.19 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.031 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.019 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.031 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.019 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 687.51 {I24} (1982Ak03), 687.7 {I6} (1989Si17) and 687.58 {I21} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.016 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.013 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.015 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.014 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2089.7 {I7} (1969Li10), 2089.51 {I15} (1989Si17) and 2089.79 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.121 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.096 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.12 {I3} (2000Sa32). 
M$>M2 suggested by |a(K)exp=0.036 (1967Ma51). It is unlikely based on the decay pattern; however E1 or E2 ruled out . 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2699.5 {I10} (1969Li10), 2699.4 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2699.12 {I20} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0064 {I19} (1989Si17) and 0.0061 {I5} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 630.93 {I17} (1982Ak03) and 630.79 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.039 {I6} (1982Ak03) and 0.035 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 709.12 {I30} (1982Ak03) and 708.7 {I6} (1989Si17) and 708.89 {I23} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.031 {I9} (1982Ak03), 0.030 {I9} (1989Si17), 0.042 {I11} (1994Mo06) and 0.025 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 976.18 {I19} (1982Ak03) and 976.2 {I10} (1989Si17) and 976.18 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.029 {I8} (1982Ak03), 0.049 {I26} (1989Si17), 0.033 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.035 {I13} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1303.8 {I4} (1969Li10) and 1303.76 {I8} (1989Si17) and 1303.73 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.26 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.21 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.20 {I5} (2000Sa32). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.015 (1967Ma51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1341.5 {I3} (1989Si17) and 1341.49 {I16} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.049 {I26} (1989Si17), 0.046 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.059 {I29} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2110.4 {I3} (1969Li10), 2109.90 {I12} (1989Si17) and 2109.96 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.189 {I17} (1989Si17), 0.19 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.17 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2719.4 {I10} (1969Li10), 2719.4 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2719.28 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0043 {I11} (1989Si17) and 0.0038 {I4} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 281.1 {I6} (1969Li10), 281.00 {I20} (1982Ak03), 280.94 {I12} (1989Si17) and 280.97 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.17 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.13 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.17 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 519.93 {I20} (1982Ak03) and 519.90 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.035 {I6} (1982Ak03), 0.036 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.039 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 524.61 {I20} (1982Ak03), 525.0 {I6} (1989Si17) and 524.59 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.038 {I6} (1982Ak03), 0.034 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.037 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.039 {I13} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 734.3 {I6} (1969Li10), 733.90 {I17} (1982Ak03), 733.65 {I10} (1989Si17) and 733.92 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.086 {I12} (1982Ak03), 0.102 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.085 {I8} (1994Mo06) and 0.092 {I17} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 964.1 {I3} (1969Li10), 964.10 {I17} (1982Ak03), 964.08 {I3} (1989Si17) and 964.11 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 964.8 {I10} (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 0.82 {I10} (1982Ak03), 0.83 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.80 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.80 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1066.9 {I8} (1989Si17) and 1067.50 {I27} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.062 {I26} (1989Si17), 0.055 {I20} (1994Mo06) and 0.051 {I24} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Si17, assigned to {+210}Pb in 1993Di09. 
RI$weighted average of 0.041 {I19} (1989Si17) and 0.035 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2770.3 {I4} (1969Li10), 2770.0 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2769.83 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.055 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.053 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.048 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 938.64 {I20} (1982Ak03) and 938.65 {I16} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.030 {I8} (1982Ak03) and 0.028 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1020.5 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1021.53 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.026 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.034 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.036 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2176.8 {I6} (1989Si17) and 2176.49 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.007 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.015 {I6} (2000Sa32); other: |?0.0085 (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2786.1 {I4} (1969Li10), 2786.1 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2785.81 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.013 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.012 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.030 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 282.04 {I36} (1982Ak03) and 282.0 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1982Ak03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Si17, not assigned to {+214}Po in 1993Di09. 
RI$from 2000Sa32; other: <0.021 (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2827.6 {I10} (1969Li10), 2827.0 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2826.92 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0064 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.0048 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.011 {I6} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Si17, not assigned to {+214}Po in 1993Di09. 
RI$weighted average of 0.021 {I13} (1989Si17) and 0.034 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2251.2 {I4} (1989Si17) and 2251.60 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.015 {I9} (1989Si17) and 0.012 {I1} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2860.9 {I8} (1989Si17) and 2861.1 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0007 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.0009 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.0008 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1595 {I1} (1989Si17) and 1594.79 {I30} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1989Si17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2259.7 {I4} (1989Si17) and 2260.39 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.019 {I9} (1989Si17), 0.019 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.020 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2280.7 {I4} (1969Li10), 2280.4 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2280.29 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.019 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.020 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.030 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2284.4 {I7} (1989Si17) and 2284.33 {I18} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.011 {I1} (1989Si17), 0.011 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.011 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2893.7 {I4} (1969Li10), 2893.6 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2893.46 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.015 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.012 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.017 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2312.5 {I10} (1969Li10), 2312.2 {I4} (1989Si17) and 2312.48 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.026 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.019 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.018 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2922.2 {I4} (1969Li10), 2922.1 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2921.86 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.034 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.029 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.035 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 
RI$from 1994Mo06; other: <0.0021 (1989Si17) and 0.005 {I1} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2928.7 {I8} (1989Si17) and 2928.52 {I22} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0021 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.0024 {I2} (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2324.8 {I10} (1989Si17) and 2325.20 {I25} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0043 {I21} (1989Si17), 0.0037 {I4} (1994Mo06); other: 0.009 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2934.9 {I8} (1989Si17) and 2934.51 {I25} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0012 {I5} (1989Si17, 0.012 listed as a typo from Priv. Comm. from B. Singh with Y. A. Akovali, May 1995), 0.0010 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.005 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1667.0 {I15} (1989Si17) and 1665.84 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.013 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.018 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.046 {I9} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2331.7 {I4} (1969Li10), 2331.3 {I3} (1989Si17) and 2331.36 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.047 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.048 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.076 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2369.3 {I6} (1989Si17) and 2369.58 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.006 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.008 {I3} (2000Sa32); other: 0.0064 (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2979.0 {I4} (1969Li10), 2978.8 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2979.01 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.031 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.030 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.034 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 
RI$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06; others: <0.021 (1989Si17) and 0.05 {I1} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2377.2 {I5} (1969Li10), 2377.0 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2376.83 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.025 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.019 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.034 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2390.9 {I6} (1989Si17) and 2390.81 {I21} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0043 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.0034 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.006 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3000.1 {I4} (1969Li10), 3000.0 {I2} (1989Si17) and 2999.8 {I3} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.019 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.019 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.030 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Si17, not assigned to {+214}Po in 1993Di09. 
RI$weighted average of 0.036 {I9} (1989Si17) and 0.033 {I9} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1636.6 {I4} (1989Si17) and 1636.25 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.041 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.024 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.06 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 
RI$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06; others: |?0.0021 (1989Si17) and 0.0040 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2444.6 {I7} (1989Si17) and 2444.9 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.017 {I9} (1989Si17) and 0.017 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3054.0 {I4} (1969Li10), 3053.9 {I2} (1989Si17) and 3053.8 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.049 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.041 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.057 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3081.7 {I4} (1969Li10), 3081.7 {I3} (1989Si17) and 3081.89 {I25} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.0085 {I17} (1989Si17), 0.011 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.020 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. Other: 1715.9 (1989Si17). 
RI$from 2000Sa32; other: <0.005 (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3093.9 {I8} (1989Si17) and 3094.0 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.0021 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.0008 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.0010 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3142.5 {I7} (1969Li10), 3142.6 {I4} (1989Si17) and 3142.5 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0043 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.0026 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.0060 {I28} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2551.0 {I10} (1989Si17) and 2550.4 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3161.2 {I10} (1969Li10), 3160.5 {I7} (1989Si17) and 3160.6 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0021 {I5} (1989Si17), 0.0010 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.0030 {I17} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3182.8 {I10} (1969Li10), 3183.6 {I4} (1989Si17) and 3183.6 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0042 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.0028 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.0060 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 609.31 keV {I1} (1995Ko54) and 609.31 keV {I6} (1976Ku08); others: 609 keV {I6} (1956As38) and 606 {I15} (1963Le17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.127 {I4} (1995Ko54) and 0.126 {I8} (1976Ku08) relative to 100 |a decay. Other: 0.16 {I5} (1963Le17) and 0.20 {I5} (1956As38). 
M$|a(exp){-tot}=0.022 {I6} deduced from (|a)(ce)/(|a)(|g) (1963Le17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$As observed in 2018Ka47. 
MR$0.37 {I20} from Adopted Gammas of {+214}Po in ENSDF database. 
M$from Adopted Gammas of {+214}Po in ENSDF database. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
CC$experimental value, deduced by 2021An14 by comparing intensity of 325|g transition to 49|g transition in a 426|g gated spectrum. 2021An14 note that |a(K)exp corresponds to a dominant M1 transition with the possibility of small E2 and/or E0 contribution. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ce(L1)/ce(L2) exp=0.516 {I47}, ce(L1)/ce(L3) exp=1.035 {I92} (1970Da09), and ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=30.6 {I9}:4.5:8.3 {I5}:3.6 {I9} (1972HeYM). Other values: |a(K)exp=0.107 {I16}, |a(L3)exp=0.016 {I5}, ce(L3)/ce(L1)+ce(L2) exp=0.40 {I6} (1970Kr08). |d=3.7 {I+10-6} if all data are used. |d=4.0 from ce data (1999Li05) is in agreement, but conversion coefficients or K/L/M ratios are not given in this study. 
Other values: E|g=271.6, I|g=87 (1957Pi31), E|g=268, I|g=11.0 (1957Pa07). Other: 1966Po02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$dominant M1 from |a(K)exp (1999Li05), and probably also from K/L/M ratio, but no numerical data are given in this work. M1 from intensity balance arguments in the decay of {+215}Bi to {+215}Po (2003Ku26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Others: 1968Br17, 1965Va10. 
M,MR from ce(L1)/ce(L2) exp=2.4 {I5} and ce(L1)/ce(L3) exp=2.8 {I4} (1970Da09). |d=0.58 from ce data (1999Li05) is in agreement, but conversion coefficients or L/M ratio are not given in this study. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other values: E|g=401, I|g=77 (1966Po02); E|g=400.6, I|g=48 (1957Pi31). Others: 1965Va10, 1957Pa07. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.027 {I12} and ce(K)/ce(L3) exp=7 {I2} (1970Kr08). Other: E2 from ce data (1999Li05), but no coefficients or ratios are given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$dominant M1 from |a(K)exp (1999Li05), but no numerical data are given in this work. 
CC$for M1 
E,RI$E|g=516.5 {I5}, I|g=0.22 {I5} (1970Da09) were not included in the input for averaging. Other: 1965Va10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of E|g's from {+216}Bi |b{+-} decay (2.25 min), {+216}Bi |b{+-} decay (2.25 min+6.6 min) and {+220}Rn |a decay. 
M from {+220}Rn |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of E|g's from {+216}Bi |b{+-} decay (2.25 min) and {+216}Bi |b{+-} decay (2.25 min+6.6 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from 1977Ku15 
RI I|g per 100 decays; recommended value from 1986LoZT based on measurements by 1984Ge07, 1977Ku15 
M from |a|g(|q) (|a decay of J|p=0+ parent) (1989Po03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$889 (2014Mo02), placed from a 1591.4 level by 2003Ku25. 
RI$weighted average of 5.7 {I7} (2003Ku25) and 7 {I2} (2014Mo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$E2 or E1 from measured Ice(K)<0.2 (1977Vy02), and |a(K)exp<0.1, but E2 gives a better |g-intensity balance at the 254.2 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from Ice(K)=0.46 {I23} to 0.76 {I23} (1977Vy02), with implied |a(K)(exp)=0.41 {I21} to 0.67 {I21} (in 0.20-0.88 range), which is consistent with M1, M1+E2, E3 or E4. The high multipolarities are less likely as these would imply the 264.68 level to be an isomer of long half-life, which is not the case from observed |a|g-coincidences 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1956Ma28. 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(theory). Measured value is I|g|?0.07 (1956Ma28) 
TI$from I|a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
ECC$deduced by authors from intensity balance considerations 
M$E2(+M1) assigned by 2019Gh11, but |DJ|p requires E2. 
$I(7381|a-130.0|g-coin)=2.0 {I8} 
$I(7217|a-130.0|g-coin)=39 {I4} 
$I(7166|a-130.0|g-coin)=14 {I3} 
$I(7074|a-130.0|g-coin)=32 {I7}; 7074|a is unplaced 
$I(6724|a-130.0|g-coin)=5 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
ECC$deduced by authors from intensity balance considerations 
$I(7217|a-150.8|g-coin)=100 
$I(7166|a-150.8|g-coin)=26 {I4} 
$I(6724|a-150.8|g-coin)=9 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$from half-life of the isomer, lack of x-rays in coin with 141|g, and systematics in this mass region 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From K/(L+M+...)exp=3.1 {I2} (2014Au03). |d was determined by the evaluator using the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$R=0.83 {I5} (2014Au03). The x-ray intensity in a spectrum produced by gating on 533|g is consistent with Mult=M1+E2, but not with a pure Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed directly, but required by the out-of-beam coincidence relationship. E|g is from level energy differences 
RI$Estimated from the reported 20% out-of-beam intensity for the 634.9|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 2014Au03 
M,MR$From K/(L+M+...)exp=3.1 {I2} (2014Au03). |d was determined by the evaluator using the briccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$calculated value using the assumption that in a closed loop of transitions, the energy shift is zero. Two loops were used, weighted average of those results given here; partially overlaps with the K|a x-ray peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$From K/(L+M+...)exp=0.45 {I4} (2015Au01). The 339|g K-conversion peak overlaps with the L+M+... conversion peaks from the 269- and 276-keV transitions. The number of 269- and 276-keV L+M+... conversion events were estimated using I|g(269|g)/I|g(276|g), the number of observed 269- and 276-keV K conversion events, and the theoretical K/(L+M+...) ratios for the 269-keV E2 and 276-keV M1 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$From 1992Hu04; other: 391 keV (1981Ri04) 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.088 {I12} and K/L=0.62 {I1} (1992Hu04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$From 1992Hu04; other: 391 keV (1981Ri04) 
M$From the |a(K)exp=0.088 {I12} and K/L=0.62 {I1} in 1992Hu04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From parallel |g-ray cascades depopulating the 3485.5-keV level: (1155.5 keV {I8} + 285.8 keV {I2} + 63.5 keV {I3} + 38.5 keV {I2}) - (948.5 keV {I7} + 544.2 keV {I5}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Derived from 285.8 keV {I2} and 365.8 keV {I2} |g-ray energies depopulating the 2330 keV isomer. 
M$from intensity balance (2018Au01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.211 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.030 {I17}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=34 {I3}. Delayed component of 19 ns {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.41 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=44 {I3}. Delayed component of 23 ns {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.098 {I19}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}; |a from intensity balance considerations. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=40 {I3}. Delayed component of 24 ns {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=0.15 {I7}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=18 {I3}. Delayed component of 23 ns {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.183 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=25 {I4}. Delayed component of 18 ns {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=0.0 {I1}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=12 {I1}. Delayed component of 30 ns {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=26 {I2}. Delayed component of 24 ns {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO(gate on 577|g)=0.95 {I9}; DCO(gate on 649|g)=1.02 {I11}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=19 {I5}. Delayed component of 16 ns {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I5}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=27 {I2}. Delayed component of 26 ns {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.58 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I7}. 
RI$Delayed intensity, I|g(delayed)=11 {I3}. Delayed component of 13 ns {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$intensity from the 649-keV gated |g|g-coin data, and normalized to the intensity of the 577-keV transition in the singles spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$measured K/LM+ (2018Au01) consistent with M1 or E1, however, angular distribution data and previous measurements support M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Derived from 285.8 keV {I2} and 365.8 keV {I2} |g-ray energies depopulating the 2330 keV isomer. 
RI$From I(|g+ce)=8 {I2} (2018Au01) and |a 
M$from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$From 1975Gi02 ({+204}At IT decay (108 ms)). Other: 585.3 keV {I2} in 1969MoZU ({+204}At IT decay (108 ms)) 
M$|a(K)exp<0.13, K/LM=1.5 {I1} from {+204}At IT decay (108 ms) (1969MoZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$No other |g rays with energies above 40 keV were observed to have excitation functions consistent with {+204}At assignment. Other: 585.3 keV {I2} in 1969MoZU 
M$|a(K)exp<0.13, K/LM=1.5 {I1} (1969MoZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.12, |a(L)exp=0.027; A{-2}=-0.42 {I1}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2} (1984Da19); A{-2}=-0.35 {I4} (1982Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0060 {I15}, A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2} (1984Da19); A{-2}=0.28 {I4} (1982Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.052 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.025 {I5} (deduced by assuming that 331.6|g is E1), A{-2}=0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1984Da19); A{-2}=0.29 {I5} (1982Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.057 {I11}, A{-2}=-0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=0.04 {I7} (1984Da19); A{-2}=A{-2}=-0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=0.12 {I10} (1982Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.043 {I4}, A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2} (1984Da19); A{-2}=-0.18 {I4} (1982Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. Not observed directly but required by the coincidence relationships. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.092 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.12 {I1}, |a(M)exp=0.044 {I11} (assuming that 494.1|g is E2); A{-2}=0.03 {I6}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8} (1984Da19). The isotropic angular distributions are attributed to relaxation of the alignment during the long lifetime of the isomer (1984Da19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. Not observed directly, but required in the out-of-beam coincidence relationship between 467.9|g and 493.8|g (below the 17/2- level) and 332.8|g and 372.3|g (above the 17/2- level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. Not observed directly, but required in the out-of-beam coincidence datam since 176.1|g and 191.6|g have delayed components with T{-1/2}=63.8 ns {I21}. 
RI$From I(|g+ce)(126.4)/I(|g+ce)(9)|?0.7, estimated from delayed |g-ray spectrum (1982Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$The absence of a prompt component in the 126.4|g(t) spectrum suggests that this |g ray directly depopulates an isomer 
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I5} and |a(exp) from intensity balance considerations (1982Sj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=291 {I23} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=644 {I14} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I4}, A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1000 {I25} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2}, A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.04 {I2} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=1000 {I17} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=100 {I23} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=427 {I36} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6}. Contaminated by the 332.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=27 {I4} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=98 {I6} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.06 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.010 {I7}, A{-2}=0.10 {I12}, A{-4}=0.05 {I20}. 
TI$Value inferred from the ns isomer decay intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=345 {I23} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=457 {I12} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.12, |a(L)exp=0.027; A{-2}=-0.42 {I1}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2}. Partially overlap with 471.5|g (A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}) (1984Da19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=192 {I19} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=227 {I10} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$A{-2}=0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I4}. Conversion coefficient values are contaminated by these for the 403.6|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=28 {I3} 
M$|a(exp)=17.0 {I30}; A{-2}=-0.10 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I20}. 
$I|g (delayed) inferred from the in-beam intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=707 {I36} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=546 {I13} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0060 {I15}, A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=98 {I15} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=309 {I11} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(exp) values unresolved from that for 468.0|g, A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1073 {I33} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=600 {I36} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.052 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.025 {I5} (deduced by assuming that 331.6|g is E1), A{-2}=0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=77 {I12} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=198 {I21} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(L)exp=0.057 {I11}, A{-2}=-0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=0.04 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=23 {I4} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=83 {I10} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$A{-2}=0.47 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.60 {I40} 
TI$Value inferred from the ns isomer decay intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=19 {I4} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=69 {I11} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$A{-2}=0.04 {I26}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I42} 
TI$Value inferred from the ns isomer decay intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=116 {I25} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=380 {I13} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2}, A{-2}=0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=13.1 {I25} 
$I|g (delayed) from intensity balance (by the evaluator). I|g (delayed)<47 in 1984Da19 
RI$I|g (delayed)<75 (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$Unresolved from 121.7|g of unknown origin 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=30 {I14} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=129 {I10} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$A{-2}=-0.22 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=942 {I22} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=610 {I14} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.043 {I4}, A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=6 {I1} 
M$A{-2}=0.06 {I18}, A{-4}=0.16 {I31} 
$I|g (delayed) inferred from the in-beam intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=42 {I6} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=226 {I10} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$A{-2}=0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=143 {I11} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=597 {I14} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(exp)<0.18; A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=30 {I7} 
RI,M$Unresolved from 299|g in {+204}At. 
RI$I|g (delayed)=111 {I19} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=7.2|*10{+-4} {I16} 
E$From adopted gammas. Not observed directly, but required by the coincidence relationships 
$I|g (delayed) from intensity balance (by the evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=142 {I7} 
RI$I|g (delayed)=542 {I11} (deduced from the decay of the 67.9 ns isomer). 
M$|a(exp)=0.87 {I31}; A{-2}=-0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=756 {I29} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.092 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.12 {I1}, |a(M)exp=0.044 {I11} (assuming that 494.1|g is E2); A{-2}=0.03 {I6}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8}. The isotropic angular distributions are attributed to relaxation of the alignment during the long lifetime of the isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Transition not observed. Its existence is suggested by the 108-ns component observed for the 412|g in {+204}Pb({+6}Li,3n|g). E|g is from the E(level) difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.19 {I3} and |a(exp) deduced from an intensity balance in the 108-ns delayed spectrum in {+204}Pb({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I7} A{-4}=0.1 {I1} and |a(exp) deduced from an intensity balance in the 108-ns delayed spectrum in {+204}Pb({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$Alternate placement from the 1018 level, suggested by 1984Sc44 must have a negligible fraction of the intensity since no 344|g-344|g coin was reported by the authors. From intensity balance arguments, I|g(344|g from 1018) must be less than |?240. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.075 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Observed in coin with the 344|g, and placed by the authors from 1041 keV to 747 keV levels, apparently a typing error. 1984Sc44 places this transition from the 1041 keV to 674 keV levels, but this placement is inconsistent with the coin data. The present evaluators suggest a placement from a new level at 1114 keV, which accommodates two additional transitions, one of which is now defined as multiply placed. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Transition not observed. Its existence is suggested by the 108-ns component observed for the 412|g. E|g from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I7} A{-4}=0.1 {I1}; |a(exp) deduced from an intensity balance in the 108-ns delayed spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=5.9 {I+23-17}. |a(K)=2.18(M1), 0.100(E1), 9.74(M2). |a(K)exp suggests mult=E1+M2, with |d=1.2 {I+11-3}; however, if the placement in the level scheme is correct, |D|p=no. Also, the deduced |d is very large for an M2 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$the energy fit is poor. Not included in the least-squares adjustment. The adjustment yields E|g=1669.62 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. The measured I(ce(M))=12 {I6} gives I|g=0.40 {I20} 
TI$from an intensity balance at the 23.5 level. The measured ce(M)=12 {I6} gives I(|g+ce)=67 {I33} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$ce(L1)=13 {I4}, ce(L2)=2.0 {I7}, ce(M)=3.9 {I5}. These intensities, along with the adopted mult give I|g=0.57 {I18}, 0.78 {I27}, and 0.64 {I8}, respectively. A weighted average gives I|g=0.64 {I7} and thus I(|g+ce)=22.3 {I24}. The normalization to the I|a values gives I|g=0.48 {I6} and I(|g+ce)=16.7 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
TI$from an intensity balance at the 72 level 
M$the directly measured quantities are I|g=1.6 {I5}, ce(L12)=6.3 {I5}, and ce(N)=0.21 {I7}. These data are mutually inconsistent, with |a(N)exp and ce(N)/ce(L12) both lying outside the M1 and E2 theory values. |a(L12)exp gives |d<0.36 and thus |a=7.8 {I17}. The measured I|g and the adopted I(|g+ce) give |a=5.4 {I+29-15}. The evaluator adopts mult=M1 from (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
TI$from the decay scheme, I(|g+ce)|>I(|g+ce)(169.9|g) (=0.63 {I13}). I(|g+ce) is deduced by taking I|a|<1% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$seen only in the ce spectrum of 1973GoXM. Not reported by 2005Ku06 
RI$from I(|g+ce) for mult=M1 
M,TI$the measured quantities are ce(L12)=4.5 {I8}, ce(M)=1.8 {I6}, and ce(N)=0.3. These data do not distinguish between M1 and E2. The authors assign a tentative M1 multipolarity. For mult=M1, one gets I(|g+ce)=7.5 {I14} from ce(L12), and 13 {I4} from ce(M). The evaluator adopts I(|g+ce)=12 {I4} from an intensity balance at the 63.6 level. See general comment on I(|g+ce) and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$the measured quantities are I|g=5.7 {I5}, ce(K)=19.7 {I50}, and ce(L12)=4.3 {I4}. From K/L12 one gets |d<0.77. The measured I|g appears to be too large since it yields a value of |a(L12)exp that is smaller than the M1 theory value. The evaluator adopts mult=M1 
RI,TI$from ce(K) one gets I|g=3.8 {I10}, I(|g+ce)=28 {I7} and from ce(L12) one gets I|g=4.6 {I4} and I(|g+ce)=34 {I3}. A weighted average gives I(|g+ce)=33 {I4} and from |a one gets I|g=4.4 {I4}. Normalization to the I|a values then gives I(|g+ce)=25 {I3} and I|g=3.3 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g/I|g(124|g)=0.05 {I1} (2005Ku06). 1973GoXM report I|g|?0.5 
M,MR$the measured quantities are I|g=0.5 and I(ce(K))=0.4, with no uncertainties quoted. These data give |d|?2.3 and |a|?2.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$2005Ku06 report I|g/I|g(145|g)=0.71 {I13}, but since the possible |a feeding to the 208 level has not been observed, no absolute I|g or I(|g+ce) intensities can be deduced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from an intensity balance at the 72 level, and the assumption that there is no direct feeding of the 72 level, one gets |a=6.1, in good agreement with the M1 theory value of 6.11. Any direct feeding of this level would increase the deduced |a and require some E2 admixture; however, as pointed out by the authors, the absence of a measurable halflife (<1 ns) suggests that the mult is mainly dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$authors' value of 1118.5 in table 1 and in the drawing must be a misprint. The transition is placed connecting the 1090 and 72 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from an intensity balance at the 1255 level, and the assumption that there is no direct feeding of the 1255 level, one gets |a=37, compared with |a(theory)=0.88 (E1), 24.8 (M1), and 361 (E2). Any direct feeding of the 1255 level would decrease the deduced |a value. The placement requires |D|p=no. The authors point out that the absence of a measurable halflife (<1 ns) suggests that the mult is mainly dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from an intensity balance at the 1300 level, and the assumption that there is no direct feeding of the 1300 level, one gets |a=4.0. Any direct feeding would decrease this value. From an intensity balance at the 1300 in the 1.5-ns delayed spectrum, using the authors data from table 2, one gets |a|>4.4. These two results establish mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}<0. From an intensity balance at the 1526 level in the 1.5-ns delayed spectrum, one gets |a|>3.9. Compared with |a(theory)=0.17 (E1), 3.86 (M1), and 1.47 (E2), and the non-measurable halflife (<1 ns), one get mult=mainly M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$the authors point out that the absence of a measurable halflife (<1 ns) for this low-energy transition suggests mult=mainly dipole. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}|?0. The authors assign mult=E1(+M2) but show no |a(K)exp. This assignment is perhaps based on the absence of any ce line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from level scheme. Not observed but required by |g|g 
M$the authors point out that the absence of a measurable halflife (<1 ns) suggests that the transition is mainly dipole. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.74 {I15} for the 286.3|g+288.2|g. A{-2}=-0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I6}. The data are consistent only with mult=M1 for both transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.74 {I15} for the 286.3|g+288.2|g. A{-2}=-0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I5}. The data are consistent only with mult=M1 for both transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from level scheme. Not observed but required by |g|g 
M$from the non-measurable halflife (<1 ns), the authors suggest that the mult must be mainly dipole. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.29 {I5} for the 351.9|g+354.4|g. A{-2}=-0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I2}. The authors assign mult=M1 or E1. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from the non-measurable halflife (<1 ns), the authors suggest that the mult must be mainly dipole. Placement in the level scheme suggests |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0348 {I17}, K:L:M=163 {I6}:73 {I5}:20.3 {I23} in {+209}Rn |e decay (1974Vy01), |a(K)exp=0.035 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.03 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} in ({+3}He,3|g) (1985Ra21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.050 {I7} from 1974Vy01 in {+209}Rn |e decay; |a(K)exp=0.055 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} from 1985Ra21 in ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=0.07 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.133 {I22} from 1975Be39 in (|a,4n|g), for 577.07+577.60 doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from ({+6}Li,3n|g) and ({+3}He,3n|g) 
E$weighted average of values from (|a,4n|g), ({+6}Li,3n|g) and ({+3}He,3n|g) 
M$|a(L)exp=0.52 {I5}, A{-2}=-0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} from 1985Ra21 in ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=3.9 {I5} and A{-2}=-0.044 {I43} from 1975Be39 in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (|a,4n|g), ({+6}Li,3n|g) and ({+3}He,3n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.011 {I1}, A{-2}=+0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} from 1985Ra21 in ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=0.016 {I3}, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=4.5 {I4}, A{-2}=+0.091 {I8} from 1975Be39 in (|a,4n|g), A{-2}=+0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} from 1976Sj01 in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.329 {I24}, K:L:M=443 {I26}:71 {I6}:18.6 {I13} (1974Vy01), |a(K)exp=0.32 {I3} (1973Jo14) from {+209}Rn |e decay, |a(K)exp=0.33 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I8} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.036 {I3}, K:L:M=75 {I6}:13.1 {I17}:3.7 {I11} (1974Vy01), |a(K)exp=0.04 {I1} (1973Jo14) from {+209}Rn |e decay, |a(K)exp=0.040 {I2} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of values from ({+6}Li,3n|g) and ({+3}He,3n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I8} from 1985Ra21 in ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 386.43 {I7} for a doublet from {+209}Rn |e decay and 386.4 {I2} for a doublet from ({+3}He,3n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.229 {I21} for a doublet from 1974Vy01, 0.2 {I1} from 1973Jo14 in {+209}Rn |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.100 {I17} (1974Vy01), |a(K)exp=0.08 {I6} (1973Jo14) from {+209}Rn |e decay |a(K)exp=0.100 {I17} is much larger than the M1 value suggesting a E0 component 
CC$0.121 {I21} from |a(K)exp=0.100 {I17} and assumption that ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.826 for M1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.049 {I3}, K:L=44.5 {I20}:7.3 {I17} (1974Vy01); |a(K)exp=0.06 {I2} (1973Jo14) from {+209}Rn |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.049 {I8} (1974Vy01) from {+209}Rn |e decay, |a(K)exp=0.04 {I1} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$635.3 {I5} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.062 {I5}, A{-2}=+0.02 {I7}, A{-4}=0.0 {I1} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$664.2 {I5} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) 
M$A{-2}=-0.07 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} from {+209}Bi({+3}He,3n|g) (1985Ra21); A{-2}=-0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2} from {+206}Pb({+6}Li,3n|g) (1976Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I1}, A{-2}=+0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=0.0222, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=3.3 {I3} and A{-2}=-0.091 {I12} (1975Be39) from (|a,4n|g), A{-2}=+0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I1} (1976Sj01) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp) based on intensity balance and I(|g) in delayed spectrum in 1976Sj01 from ({+6}Li,3n|g), A{-2}=+0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=6.3 {I8} (1975Be39) from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.078 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I5} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g), A{-2}=-0.59 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1976Sj01) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.183, A{-2}=-0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=0.23 {I2}, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=5.9 {I4} and A{-2}=-0.123 {I14} (1975Be39) from (|a,4n|g), A{-2}=-0.26 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.4 {I3} (1976Sj01) from ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.03 {I1} and A{-2}=-0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} for the 753.7+754.4 doublet (1985Ra21) in ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.008 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.21 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I9} (1985Ra21) in ({+3}He,3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,4n|g), I(386.6|g)/I(810.6|g)=5/6.7 from ({+3}He,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.129 {I11}, K:L=17.2 {I10}:2.97 {I20} (1974Vy01); |a(K)exp=0.2 {I1} (1973Jo14) from {+209}Rn |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.055 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (1985Ra21) from ({+3}He,3n|g), |a(exp)=0.07 {I1}, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=2.0 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.133 {I22} (1975Be39) from (|a,4n|g), for 577.07+577.60 doublet; T{-1/2}=0.89 |ms {I3} implies mult=E3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$|<625 {I39} for this multiply placed transition if normalized to I(2114.05|g)=100 {I4}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.229 {I21} for a doublet from 1974Vy01, 0.2 {I1} from 1973Jo14 in {+209}Rn |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.05 {I1} and A{-2}=-0.38 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I9} for the 759.3+760.3 doublet (1985Ra21) in ({+3}He,3n|g), mult=D from |g(|q) (1990Mu04) in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$transition is placed from the 2712 level by 1974Vy01; however, this placement is not consistent with the |g|g data of 1973Jo14 where the 577|g is not seen in coincidence with the 1038|g. The 577|g is placed as a ground-state transition in the in-beam studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$placed by 1974Vy01 from the 3544 level. In ({+3}He,3n|g), the 722|g is placed from the 1131 level. The agreement in energy in the measured |a(K)exp suggests that the same transition is being observed in the two experiments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$transition shown on the level scheme in 1974Vy01, but not in table of gammas. Intensity deduced by evaluators based on intensity balance at the 2822 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and theoretical conversion coefficient assuming mult=M1 
M$lifetime limit T{-1/2}<5 ns rules out a pure E2 multipolarity (1976Sj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and theoretical conversion coefficient 
M$from conversion coefficient based on intensity balance and I(|g) in delayed spectrum (1976Sj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.055 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} for 577.0+577.7 and I(577.0|g)/I(577.7|g)=95/11 given mult(577.7|g) is E3 from 1975Be39 in (|a,4n|g). |a(K)exp=0.55 in 1985Ra21 is a typographical error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from 1975Be39 in (|a,4n|g). Also, A{-2}=+0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2} (1985Ra21), T{-1/2}=24 ns 2 rules out mult=pure M2 
$RI$2 1 from 1978Ad05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.030 {I3}, but A{-2}=-0.33 {I4} and A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} imply a stretched dipole (1985Ra21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g for the doublet and I|g(386.4|g) determined from branching in |e decay. 4 {I2} for 386.3|g in 1978Ad05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=0.016 {I3}, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=4.5 {I4}, A{-2}=+0.091 {I8} from 1975b39 
$|g-branching: I(148|g)/I(725|g)=0.072 from singles spectrum; 0.051 from delayed spectrum; 0.054 {I18} from authors' deduced I(|g+ce) for the 725.1|g and 577.0|g based on intensity-balance arguments, the requirement I(|g+ce 148.0|g)=I(|g+ce 577.0|g), and adopted |a's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=6.3 {I8} from an intensity balance at the 1321.6 level using delayed intensities (1975Be39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=0.23 {I2} from intensity balance in delayed spectrum, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=5.9 {I4}, A{-2}=-0.123 {I14} from 1975Be39 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=0.07 {I1} from intensity balances, and also |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=2.0 {I2} and A{-2}=-0.133 {I22} for the 577.0+577.4 doublet from 1975Be39 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.44 {I8}, K/L=2.8 {I4} 
A{-2}|?0 
B(M2)(W.u.)=0.0026 from configuration=(|n 2g{-9/2}){+1} to configuration=(|n 2f{-5/2}){+-1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$4.4 {I13} in ({+7}Li,4n|g) and 7.7 in (|a,2n|g) are in disagreement 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+211}Rn |e 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced from level scheme; |g unobserved. 
TI$I(|g+ce)(24.2|g)/I(|g+ce)(713.6|g)=3.3 {I3}, deduced from intensity balance in IT decay 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g(at 48 MeV)=1.0 {I2} 
RI$646.7|g is listed twice in table 2 of 2001Ba79, one with I|g=5.3 {I5} and the other with I|g=3.2 {I5}; the former value is adopted here since it agrees with the branching ratio of 24 {I2} and with I|g values at 48 MeV 
Branching ratio=24 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g from |a and I(|g+ce)|?40 (1970Be37) 
M$|a|g(|q) suggests a stretched E2 transition (1970Be37). 
CC$|a excludes |a(K). K-shell binding energy=95.73 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$prompt I|g=3.4 (1970Be53) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.032 {I6} mult=E3 or M1+E2; from K/L=2.5 {I4} mult.=E3 or M4. (|a(K)exp measured relative to |a(K)(1066.9|g) E2 transition, 1985Ka07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(exp)=1.6 {I3} from relative cascading intensities, |a(L)exp=0.20 {I3}, L/M=4.3 {I9}. (|a(L)exp measured relative to |a(K)(1066.9|g) for E2 transition, 1985Ka07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.083 {I8}, K/L=1.06 {I11} (1985Ka07). (|a(K)exp measured relative to |a(K)(1066.9|g) E2 transition.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from E(level) difference 
TI$from intensity balances at 2617 and 2641 levels; weighted average of 73 {I11} (from intensity balance at 2641 level) and 79 {I10} ((from intensity balance at 2617 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=7.2 {I7} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.47 {I5}, K:L2:M+N=7.2 {I7}:4.6 {I4}:1.4 {I4}; |a(L12)exp=0.31 {I2} (1972As12); K/L=0.6 (1956St60) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=1.0 {I4} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.104 {I24}, L12/L3=3.5 {I19} (1972As12); and from |g|g(|q) (1985BuZT) 
$|d(M3/E2)=-0.12 {I7} (1990Ve05) 
(250|g)(192|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.18 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I11} (1990Ve05) 
(250|g)(866|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.179 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}(1990Ve05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from K/L=1.9 {I5} (1956St60) and |g|g(|q) (1985BuZT) (theory: K/L(E2)=2.45, K/L(M1)=5.70, K/L(M4)=1.82) 
(442|g)(674|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.230 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.025 {I15} (1990Ve05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.21 {I3} 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.021 {I3}. Also |d=-0.01 {I17} from |g|g(|q) 
(853|g)(947|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1990Ve05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.08 {I3} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} 
$|d(M3/E2)=+0.03 {I7}, >+32 or <-7 (1990Ve05); the latter two values are unrealistic, as 934.7 transition is not expected to be pure M3 
(935|g)(866|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9} (1990Ve05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.7 {I2} 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3}. (M1+E2 also allowed by |a(K)exp, but ruled out by the decay scheme). 
(678|g)(853|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (1990Ve05) 
(678|g)(1127|g)(|q)+(1127|g)(674|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.066 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I15} (1990Ve05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.10 {I3} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I4} 
(1363|g)(442|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.040 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I17} (1990Ve05) 
(1363G)(442G)(THETA): A2=-0.068 8, A4=-0.014 15 (QUOTED BY 1990Ve05 FROM A 1985 ^JINR PREPRINT P6-85-760, BY SAME AUTHORS AS 1985BuZT) 
(1363|g)(250|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.038 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1990Ve05) 
(1363G)(250G)(THETA): A2=-0.079 9, A4=+0.001 19 (QUOTED BY 1990Ve05 FROM A 1985 ^JINR PREPRINT P6-85-760, BY SAME AUTHORS AS 1985BuZT) 
(1363|g)(169|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.001 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} (1990Ve05). The corresponding values from 1985BuZT disagree 
(1363G)(169G)(THETA): A2=+0.296 5, A4=+0.008 5 (QUOTED BY 1990Ve05 FROM A 1985 ^JINR PREPRINT P6-85-760, BY SAME AUTHORS AS 1985BuZT). THESE VALUES SEEM DISCREPANT SINCE DEDUCED MR(169)=0.46 2 DISAGREES WITH 2.8 4 FROM CE DATA AND 2.9 4 FROM GG(THETA) (1990Ve05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 49.1 {I15} from {+208}Pb({+7}Li,3n|g) and 50.0 {I15} from {+212}At IT decay (152 |ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 7.7 {I10} from {+208}Pb({+7}Li,3n|g) and 8.0 {I8} from {+212}At IT decay (152 |ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 7.3 {I5} from {+208}Pb({+7}Li,3n|g) and 7.5 {I5} from {+212}At IT decay (152 |ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 13.6 {I17} from {+208}Pb({+7}Li,3n|g) and 12.5 {I25} from {+212}At IT decay (152 |ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 29 {I7} from {+208}Pb({+7}Li,3n|g) and 33 {I5} from {+212}At IT decay (152 |ms) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$K| x ray/I|g(160.3|g)=3 {I1} (1996Li37) 
RI$deduced by evaluators from measured |a and |g feeding. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$a weak transition at 55 keV is observed in coincidence with the 8933-keV |a peak, however feeding of the 55-keV level could not be identified. 
RI$|? 0.03 normalized to 100 total decays from both the 0.70 |ms g.s and the 133-keV, 71 ns isomer measured in secular equilibrium with the {+220}Ac parent (1996Li37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$I(K| x ray)=3.0 {I5} in |a-K| x ray coin is consistent with M1 multipolarity. Also K| x ray/I|g(160.3|g)=3 {I1} suggests M1. 
RI$1.0 {I2} normalized to 100 total decays from both the 0.70 |ms g.s and the 133-keV, 71 ns isomer measured in secular equilibrium with the {+220}Ac parent (1996Li37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$transition-intensity balance at 160-keV level requires |a|?25, thus the 45-keV |g ray is predominately M1. 
RI$0.15 {I5} normalized to 100 total decays from both the 0.70 |ms g.s and the 133-keV, 71 ns isomer measured in secular equilibrium with the {+220}Ac parent (1996Li37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$excit shows that this |g feeds the ground state. 
M$|g(|q) rules out |DJ=0,2; |a(L)exp|?0.7 indicates M1. 
$A{-2}=-0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.60 {I15}; |g(|q) shows |DJ=1 with A{-4}=0.09 {I2} suggesting Q admixture. 
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=0.09 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.35 {I5} suggests M1; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q or |DJ=0 d transitions. 
$A{-2}=-0.04 {I4}, A{-4}=0.04 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$E|g=567.1 given in table 2 in 1982Lo01 is possibly a misprint. The level scheme (fig. 7) gives 567.6 which fits the level energies. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.090 {I15} 
$A{-2}=-0.01 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$although the transition is assumed to be M1, A{-4}=0.20 {I4} in |g(|q) suggests some E2 admixture. 
$A{-2}=0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=0.20 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.26 {I7}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q or |DJ=0 d transition. 
$A{-2}=-0.1 {I2}, A{-4}=0.2 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.068 {I15}; |g(|q) rules out a pure Q or D transition. 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I10}, A{-4}>0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.073 {I10}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q and |DJ=0 d transitions. 
$A{-2}=-0.2 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp|?0.03; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q and |DJ=0 d,Q transitions, A{-4}=0.13 {I5} indicates |DJ=1 d+Q transition. 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=0.123 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$E|g=526.4 given in table 2 (1982Lo01) seems to be a misprint. The value, 526.7 appears on level scheme (fig.7) and agrees with the deduced level energy. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I3} suggests M1; A{-4}=-0.23 {I14} in |g(|q) indicates Q admixture. 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.23 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4}; |g(|q) data suggest |DJ=2 Q or |DJ=1 d+Q transition. 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0086 {I20}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=0,1 Q transition. 
$A{-2}=0.21 {I10}, A{-4}=0.04 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.43 {I5}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q and |DJ=0 d transitions. 
$A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I4}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q and |DJ=0 d transitions. 
$A{-2}=-0.29 {I15}, A{-4}=0.3 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.017 {I5}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=0,2 Q and |DJ=0 d transitions, A{-4}=0.4 {I2} suggests Q admixture. 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I14}, A{-4}=0.4 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.13 {I6}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=1,2 Q, |DJ=0 d transitions. 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2} 
M$1982Lo01 assign E1, however, |a(K) is more consistent with M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted Gammas. Tentative E|g=75.0 keV observed in |g|g coin spectrum with (278.1|g, 377.2|g) (1982Lo01) was not seen in {+208}Pb({+7}Li,3n|g) (1999Ba30). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.012 {I5}; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=0,1 Q and |DJ=1 d transitions. 
$A{-2}=0.4 {I3}, A{-4}=0.2 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.02 suggests M1+E2; |g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q and |DJ=0 d transitions 
$A{-2}=-0.3 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.06 suggests M1; |g(|q) rules out pure D (A{-4}=0.26 {I15}), |DJ=2 Q and |DJ=0 d transitions 
$A{-2}=-0.14 {I9}, A{-4}=0.26 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Its existence is inferred from the observed (188.4)(386.7|g) coincidences. Intensity balance at 1111.3 level yields I(|g+ce)(18.4)/I|g(405.1|g)<1.2 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E A low-energy (50-keV) unobserved |g transition was postulated to explain the observed isomer (2003LaZZ - ({+7}Li,p2n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
The large B(E3)(W.u) value implies |DJ=|DL=3 transition, which is consistent with the |p (i{-13/2}{++1}) |) |p (f{-7/2}{++1}) orbitals change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Its existence is inferred from the observed (188.4)(386.7|g) coincidences (1980Sj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E Other: 405.1 (1981Bo29) 
RI |g overlapped with 405-keV transition in {+212}Po, and I|g=58 was measured for the total peak. The {+213}At and {+212}Po components were deduced by 1980Sj01 from |g|g-coincidence measurements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
It was not possible to exclude the prompt component of 188.4|g due to higher Compton background at this energy region (1980Sj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E A low-energy (50-keV) unobserved |g transition was postulated to explain the observed isomer (2003LaZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
M Proposed in 2003LaZZ based on predicted E3 strength of 23 W.u. {I2} compared to 26 W.u. {I1} in {+212}At (27 W.u. {I1} in the ENSDF). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 100.63 {I2} (1994Ar23), 99.52 {I6} (1995Bu17) and 100.25 {I2} (1999Gr33). 
M$|a(L)exp=1.2 {I6} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 118.0 {I2} (1968Le07,1969LeZW), 117.67 {I5} (1994Ar23), 118.18 {I9} (1995Bu17) and 117.82 {I3} (1999Gr33). 
M,MR$From |a(L)exp=1.5 {I8} (1969Dz06). Note that |a(exp)=13.5 {I86} (1999Gr33) is not consistent with either M1 or E2 (|a(M1)=7.6, |a(E2)=3.9) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 218.0 {I4} (1968Le07,1969LeZW), 218.30 {I2} (1994Ar23), 218.14 {I3} (1995Bu17) and 218.12 {I2} (1999Gr33). 
M$From K:(L1+L2):L3=1.50 {I7}:1.40 {I15}:0.53 {I5} in 1969Dz06. |a(exp)=0.14 used as a normalization in 1995Sh01. |g anisotropy in 1992Li26 is also consistent with Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 53.54 {I18} (1995Bu17) and 53.81 {I3} (1999Gr33). 
M$|a(L)exp=8 {I4} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 171.83 {I3} (1999Gr33), 171.68 {I4} (1995Bu17), 172.05 {I5} (1994Ar23). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.3 {I1} (1995Sh01); |a(exp)=0.84 {I2} (1999Gr33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01 and 1999Gr33. Other: 96.12 {I18} (1995Bu17). 
M$|a(L)exp>2.5 (1995Sh01) would imply a sizable E2 component (|a(L,M1)=1.98, |a(L,E2)=6.6). Note, that |a(exp)=25 {I15} (1999Gr33) is not consistent with either M1 or E2 (|a(M1)=2.6, |a(E2)=8.9). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 150.21 {I3} (1999Gr33), 150.04 {I4} (1995Bu17), 150.43 {I5} (1994Ar23). 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=2.6 {I5} (1995Sh01) and 2.2 {I7} (1969Dz06). Other: |a(exp)=3.5 {I9} (1999Gr33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 382.34 {I4} (1999Gr33), 381.81 {I4} (1995Bu17), 382.36 {I2} (1994Ar23). 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.25 {I10} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 410.64 {I5} (1999Gr33), 409.93 {I7} (1995Bu17), 410.73 {I2} (1994Ar23). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.03 {I1} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 324.10 {I6} (1999Gr33), 323.99 {I6} (1995Bu17), 323.99 {I3} (1994Ar23). 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.4 {I2} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 359.86 {I4} (1999Gr33) and 359.92 {I6} (1995Bu17) 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.4 {I1} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 100.63 {I2} (1994Ar23), 99.52 {I6} (1995Bu17) and 100.25 {I2} (1999Gr33). 
RI$Unweighted average of 14.7 {I9} (1994Ar23), 8.9 {I27} (1999Gr33) and 13.3 {I18} (1995Sh01). Other: 10.1 {I5} (1995Bu17) 
M$|a(L)exp=1.2 {I6} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 118.0 {I2} (1968Le07,1969LeZW), 117.67 {I5} (1994Ar23), 118.18 {I9} (1995Bu17) and 117.82 {I3} (1999Gr33). 
RI$From 1999Gr33. Others: 3.28 {I17} (1994Ar23), 0.44 {I18} (1995Sh01) and 2.16 {I27} (1995Bu17) 
M,MR$From |a(L)exp=1.5 {I8} (1969Dz06). Note that |a(exp)=13.5 {I86} (1999Gr33) is not consistent with either M1 or E2 (|a(M1)=7.6, |a(E2)=3.9) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 218.0 {I4} (1968Le07,1969LeZW), 218.30 {I2} (1994Ar23), 218.14 {I3} (1995Bu17) and 218.12 {I2} (1999Gr33). 
RI$1000 {I9} (1995Sh01), 1000 {I34} (1994Ar23), 1000 {I13} (1999Gr33) and 1000 {I27} (1995Bu17) 
M$From K:(L1+L2):L3=1.50 {I7}:1.40 {I15}:0.53 {I5} in 1969Dz06. |a(exp)=0.14 used as a normalization in 1995Sh01. |g anisotropy in 1992Li26 is also consistent with Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 53.54 {I18} (1995Bu17) and 53.81 {I3} (1999Gr33). 
RI$Weighted average of 1.16 {I27} (1999Gr33) and 1.50 {I44} (1995Sh01). Other: 0.41 {I5} (1995Bu17) 
M$|a(L)exp=8 {I4} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 171.83 {I3} (1999Gr33), 171.68 {I4} (1995Bu17), 172.05 {I5} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 6.80 {I18} (1999Gr33) and 5.8 {I11} (1995Sh01). Others: 5.17 {I17} (1994Ar23) and 7.12 {I27} (1995Bu17) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.3 {I1} (1995Sh01); |a(exp)=0.84 {I2} (1999Gr33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E$Rounded off from 1995Bu17. Other: 314.20 {I5} (1994Ar23). 
RI$From 1999Gr33. Others: 0.58 {I10} (1994Ar23) and 0.41 {I7} (1995Bu17), but those were found in 1999Gr33 to be significantly affected by coincidence summing 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01 and 1999Gr33. Other: 96.12 {I18} (1995Bu17). 
RI$From 1999Gr33. Others: <0.88 (1995Sh01) and 1.3 {I4} (1995Bu17) 
M$|a(L)exp>2.5 (1995Sh01) would imply a sizable E2 component (|a(L,M1)=1.98, |a(L,E2)=6.6). Note, that |a(exp)=25 {I15} (1999Gr33) is not consistent with either M1 or E2 (|a(M1)=2.6, |a(E2)=8.9). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 150.21 {I3} (1999Gr33), 150.04 {I4} (1995Bu17), 150.43 {I5} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 4.20 {I18} (1999Gr33), 5.31 {I88} (1995Sh01) and 3.62 {I17} (1994Ar23). Other: 5.32 {I9} (1995Bu17) 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=2.6 {I5} (1995Sh01) and 2.2 {I7} (1969Dz06). Other: |a(exp)=3.5 {I9} (1999Gr33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 282.12 {I9} (1999Gr33), 282.36 {I15} (1995Bu17), 282.25 {I5} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.63 {I9} (1999Gr33), 0.71 {I27} (1995Sh01) and 0.56 {I9} (1994Ar23). Other: 0.11 {I4} (1995Bu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 382.34 {I4} (1999Gr33), 381.81 {I4} (1995Bu17), 382.36 {I2} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 2.95 {I18} (1999Gr33), 2.74 {I88} (1995Sh01) and 3.02 {I17} (1994Ar23). Other: 2.97 {I18} (1995Bu17) 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.25 {I10} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 410.64 {I5} (1999Gr33), 409.93 {I7} (1995Bu17), 410.73 {I2} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 10.55 {I18} (1999Gr33), 9.7 {I18} (1995Sh01) and 10.3 {I9} (1994Ar23). Other: 11.17 {I18} (1995Bu17) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.03 {I1} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 324.10 {I6} (1999Gr33), 323.99 {I6} (1995Bu17), 323.99 {I3} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 1.70 {I9} (1999Gr33), 1.06 {I27} (1995Sh01) and 1.38 {I9} (1994Ar23). Other: 1.7 {I7} (1995Bu17) 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.4 {I2} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 437.00 {I5} (1999Gr33) and 435.68 {I10} (1994Ar23). 
RI$From 1999Gr33. Others: ~~0.09 (1995Sh01) and 0.34 {I6} (1994Ar23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 537.8 {I8} (1999Gr33), 537.0 {I2} (1995Bu17) and 538.02 {I10} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.45 {I4} (1999Gr33), 0.18 {I9} (1995Sh01) and 0.34 {I10} (1994Ar23). Other: 0.27 {I4} (1995Bu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 468.3 {I7} (1999Gr33) and 469.6 {I2} (1995Bu17) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.13 {I3} (1999Gr33) and 0.18 {I9} (1995Sh01). Other: 0.26 {I4} (1995Bu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1999Gr33 (same in 1995Bu17). Other: 568.4 {I10} (1995Sh01) 
RI$From 1999Gr33. Others: ~~0.09 (1995Sh01) and 0.14 {I4} (1995Bu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 359.86 {I4} (1999Gr33) and 359.92 {I6} (1995Bu17) 
RI$Weighted average of 3.58 {I18} (1999Gr33), 3.19 {I88} (1995Sh01) and 3.19 {I17} (1994Ar23). Other: 3.5 {I11} (1995Bu17) 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.4 {I1} (1995Sh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$From 1999Gr33 (same in 1995Bu17). Other: 577.0 {I8} (1995Sh01) and 577.76 {I6} (1994Ar23). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.26 {I4} (1999Gr33), 0.35 {I9} (1995Sh01) and 0.41 {I6} (1994Ar23). Other: 0.33 {I5} (1995Bu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1995Sh01. Others: 446.30 {I8} (1999Gr33) and 445.07 {I20} (1995Bu17) 
RI$From 1999Gr33. Others: ~~0.09 (1995Sh01) and 0.08 {I4} (1995Bu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|d(E2/M1)<0.2 from |a(L)exp, but pure M1 from intensity balance obtained from I|a and I(|g+ce) 
ELC$from I(L-x rays)/I|g(58.9)=130 {I30}/68 {I20}, and fluorescence yield |w=0.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)>8.0 from |a(K)exp and >2.5 from |a(L)exp. Both values are consistent with intensity balance argument; however assigned J|p values require E2 
EKC$from I(K-x rays)/I|g(150.9)=50 {I22}/252 {I25}, and fluorescence yield |w=1 
ELC$from I(L-x rays)/I|g(150.9)=98 {I30}/252 {I25}, and fluorescence yield |w=0.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Existence of this transition implied from observation of weak 150.9|g in coincidence with 5172|a, and required by intensity balance arguments 
TI$From I|a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
ECC$deduced by 2001Li44 from I|g(145)/I|g(151)=0.5 {I2} in (5172|a)|g-coin data and mult=E2 for 150.9|g 
MR$from |a(exp); consistent with intensity balance argument 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$corrected by the evaluator from I(|g+ce) assuming E2 multipolarity. No actual multipolarity was given by the authors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=1.1 was assumed by 2015Ga19 in their data analysis, from comparison to known values in the region. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From 2015Ga19 
RI$<19 {I9} in 2015Ga19 is probably a typo, since B(E2)(W.u.)<0.4 in 2015Ga19 is consistent with I|g < 1.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.7 {I1}. Note, that the value is somewhat larger than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+1.2 {I4}. Note, that the value is somewhat larger than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.9 {I4}. Note, that the value is somewhat larger than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.7 {I1}. Note, that the value is somewhat large than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 
E,RI$Other: E|g=442.9 keV {I2}, I|g=18 {I4} (1994Fr11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.7 {I1}. Note, that the value is somewhat large than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 
E,RI$Other: E|g=310.6 keV {I2}, I|g=15 {I2} (1994Fr11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+1.2 {I4}. Note, that the value is somewhat large than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 
E,RI$Other: E|g=598.0 keV {I2}, I|g=42 {I7} (1994Fr11). I|g differs significantly from that reported by 2001Ne11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.9 {I4}. Note, that the value is somewhat large than that expected for a pure E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$Other: |a(exp) deduced from intensity-balance considerations favors E1 rather than M1 assignment in {+192}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Based on |g(|q) the E1 multipolarity is assigned in 1981Ho29, but the |a(exp) deduced from intensity balance considerations in 2002Do19 favors M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$DCO is for gate on |DJ=1, dipole transition 
M$The intensity balance is consistent with M1 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp) deduced from intensity balances consideration favors E1 rather than M1 assignment; A{-2}=-0.18 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$M1 suggested by 1981Ho29 on the basis of T{-1/2}; however, intensity balance favors E1; A{-2}=-0.22 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$660 {I40} with {+109}Ag target relative to 740 {I50} for 5/2- to 1/2- g.s. transition in {+109}Ag 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_comment:
E$From {+205}Fr |e decay (2010De04), based on the observed 558.7-keV ce line in coincidence with the Rn X rays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at the 31.40-keV level and by assuming no direct %|e+%|b{++} feeding to this level (|DJ=3) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_comment:
E$From 2010De04, based on the observed 558.7-keV ce line in coincidence with the Rn X rays. The |g rays is highly contaminated 
RI$From %|e+%|b{++} feeding to this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce) in 1981Ho29 and corrected by |a(M1)=1.185 from 1978Ro21. 
M$Other: from total |a deduced from intensity balance in |g|g coin studies in 1981Ho29 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce) in 1981Ho29 and corrected by |a(M2)=0.333 from 1978Ro21 
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I5} (2008An01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.018 {I4} and |a(L)exp=0.0068 {I16} (2008An01); A{-2}=0.13 {I2} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.15 {I1} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 100 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I7} and |a(L)exp=0.0076 {I18} (2008An01); A{-2}=0.13 {I1} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g) ; A{-2}=0.16 {I2} and A{-4}=0.31 {I22} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 104 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.011 {I3} and |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I4} (2008An01); A{-2}=0.11 {I3} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.12 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.48 {I16} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 97 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas 
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I4} (2008An01). Note, that 684|g is labeled as E1 in Table 1 in 2008An01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.11 {I7} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.06 {I2} and A{-4}=-0.48 {I32} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 90 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} and |a(L)exp=0.0097 {I23} (2008An01); A{-2}=-0.08 {I2} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.01 {I3} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g). 
TI$Other: 55 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I5} and A{-4}=0.17 {I8} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=-0.38 {I11} and A{-4}=0.40 {I16} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g); using |a deduced from intensity balance in |g|g coin data 
TI$Other: 31 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I5} (2008An01); A{-2}=0.00 {I3} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.03 {I6} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g). 
TI$Other: 30 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.34 {I10} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.21 {I10} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$26 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) reaction at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I13} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=-0.11 {I37} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 13 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I6} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=-0.52 {I9} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$5 (E1) or 10 (M1) in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g) at 88 MeV (1981Ho29); I(|g+ce)=4 (E1) or 8 (M1) in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.018 {I5} (2008An01); A{-2}=0.04 {I3} and A{-4}=0.25 {I6} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.16 {I5} and A{-4}=0.16 {I7} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 20 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.55 {I4} and A{-4}=0.64 {I61} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=-0.50 {I6} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$16 (E1) or 18 (M1) in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g) at 88 MeV (1981Ho29); I(|g+ce)=18 (E1) or 20 (M1) in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.22 {I3} and A{-4}=-0.45 {I46} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=0.18 {I18} and A{-4}=0.29 {I28} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$Other: 15 in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.56 {I40} in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g); A{-2}=-0.13 {I30} in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI$4 (E1) or 5 (M1) in {+197}Au({+14}N,5n|g) at 88 MeV (1981Ho29); I(|g+ce)=6 (E1) or 7 (M1) in {+194}Pt({+16}O,4n|g) at 95 MeV (1981Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Anisotropy of 20% {I15} was measured for 665.1|g in {+207}Rn IT decay (1974Re06), thus suggesting mult=Q. The balance of the level scheme in 1974Re06 requires mult.=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$257|g was in coincidence with all |g-rays above the 1904 keV level, but the connecting transitions were not observed in {+196}Pt({+16}O,5n|g) (2003Lu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$665.1|g was in prompt (40 ns) coincidence with Rn K| x ray 
M$Anisotropy of 20% {I15} was measured for 665.1|g (1974Re06), thus suggesting mult=Q. The balance of the level scheme requires mult.=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$234|g was not seen in beam-on spectra, and hence was assigned to depopulate the isomer directly 
M$|a(K)exp=3.6 {I9} from K| x ray/I|g in 1974Re06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$257|g was in coincidence with all |g-rays above the 1904 keV level, but the connecting transitions were not observed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from ({+16}O,4n|g). I|g=1.12 {I17} in |e decay. Note, however, that I|g from coin is |?2 times that in singles and thus agrees well with in-beam value (see table V in 1981Ri02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from E(level) difference. Transition not observed but existence inferred from observed 89|g-470|g coincidences 
TI relative I(|g+ce) calculated from requirement of intensity balance at the 1659 level (data from |e decay. From ({+16}O,4n|g). I(|g+ce)=9.8 {I11} in the absence of side feeding) 
RI from I(|g+ce), I|g=1.2 {I4} if M1 and 0.31 {I9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from energy level difference. Not observed. Existence inferred from coincidence data in ({+16}O,4n|g) 
M from decay scheme, multipolarity=M1 or E2. Note that B(M1)(W.u.)|?0.039, B(E2)(W.u.)|?490 for I(|g+ce)(3.1|g)|?89% and |a=4.8|*10{+3} (M1), 1.4|*10{+7} (E2) (from 1978Ro21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E from energy level difference. Not seen but presence inferred from coincidence data in ({+16}O,4n|g) 
TI from intensity balance at the 1659 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Not observed. Existence inferred from coincidence data 
TI from intensity balance at the 1658 level, I(|g+ce)=6.4 {I7} relative to I|g(635.8|g)=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from measured I|g and I(|g+ce) determined from an intensity balance of delayed components at the 1828 level the authors obtain |a=20 {I4}. |a(theory)=14.4 (E2), 3.8 (M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E not observed. Existence inferred from coincidence data. E|g from energy level differences 
M from decay scheme, multipolarity=M1 or E2. Note that B(M1)(W.u.)|?0.039, B(E2)(W.u.)|?490 for |a=4430(M1), 1.33|*10{+7}(E2) (values from 2005KiZT) and I(|g+ce)(3.1|g)|?89%. Note that the |a values do not include any M-shell conversion since the transition energy is very close to the M-shell binding energies. The B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values are thus upper limits 
TI I(|g+ce)|?53 from intensity balance at the 2618 level. From intensity balance at the 2621 level one obtains I(|g+ce)|?45 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4}. From measured I|g and I(|g+ce) determined from an intensity balance of delayed components at the 2465 level, the authors obtain |a=0.56 {I45}. |a(theory)=0.16 (E1), 4.0 (M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I8} gives mult=dipole. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} give mult=dipole. |a(K)exp|<0.8 {I3} gives mult= E1, E2, or M1. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from measured I|g and I(|g+ce) determined from an intensity balance of delayed components at the 3739 level, the authors obtain |a=4.2 {I13}. |a(theory)=4.68 (M1), 1.74 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}. |a(K)exp|<0.11 {I3}. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from measured I|g and I(|g+ce) determined from an intensity balance of delayed components at the 3925 level the authors obtain |a=5.9 {I12}. A{-2}=-0.11 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.31 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+208}Rn Adopted dataset in ENSDF database (June 2007 update) 
CC$theoretical value from BrIcc code 
$Efficiency-corrected |g-ray intensities for {+208}Rn in coincidence with the projectile and target in 43.9|'-51.9|', 35.5|'-43.9|' and 25.0|'-35.5|' angular ranges were 136 {I15}, 130 {I14} and 120 {I14}, respectively. Corresponding intensities for the targets were: 401 {I25}, 342 {I23}, 263 {I20} 
$From E2 matrix element given in column 2 of Table 4 in 2016Gr07, compiler obtains B(E2)=0.098 {I+43-35}, and correspondingly, B(E2)(W.u.)=13 {I+6-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$from {+213}Ra |a decay (2.73 min). I|g/I|g(215|g)=0.12 {I11} in {+213}Ra |a decay (2.15 ms) (2006Ku26) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=8.1 {I24} in {+213}Ra |a decay (2.73 min) (2006Ku26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from estimated E2 admixture <58% based on intensity balance in {+213}Ra |a decay (2.73 min) (2006Ku26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$Not observed, but inferred in {+213}Ra |a decay (2.73 min) (2006Ku26) from intensity balance at the 328 level. Intensity limit of I(113.3|g)/I(328.3|g)<0.15 in 2006Ku26 is based upon systematics of N=123 isotones. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$Estimated by 2006Ku26 from intensity balance, life-time limit, and ce data. M1+E2 is not excluded from {+213}Ra |a decay (2.73 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=1.10 {I6}, |a(K)exp=0.89 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.27 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} from {+198}Pt({+16}O,5n|g) (1985Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.22, A{-2}=-0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}. |a(K)exp is consistent with E1 or E2(+M1); the placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is consistent with D or E2. The placement in the level scheme requires mult=E2 from {+198}Pt({+16}O,5n|g) (1985Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.071 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.056 {I7}, A{-2}=+0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} from {+198}Pt({+16}O,5n|g) (1985Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$M1 or E3 from |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.005 {I1}, A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} from {+198}Pt({+16}O,5n|g) (1985Po08); T{-1/2} rules out M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I6} from {+198}Pt({+16}O,5n|g), consistent with a |DJ=0 pure dipole (1985Po08); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$0.42 {I15} from 1976Ra37 per 100 |a decays. I(104.8|g)/I(214.9|g)=29 {I5}/100 {I3} (2006Ku26). 
M$|a(exp)=8.1 {I24} in 2006Ku26 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition not observed, it is inferred by 2006Ku26 from intensity balance at the 328 level. Intensity limit of I(113.3|g)/I(328.3|g)<0.15 in 2006Ku26 is based upon systematics of N=123 isotones. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=1.10 {I6}, |a(K)exp=0.89 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.27 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1985Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.22, A{-2}=-0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}. |a(K)exp is consistent with E1 or E2(+M1). The placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 
$EKC LT 0.22 in 1985Po08 could be in a typographical error and should be EKC LT 0.022 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.41 is consistent with D or E2. The placement in the level scheme requires mult=E2. A{-2}=+0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1985Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$unassigned in Table 2 and not shown in the level scheme, but included in the table of branching ratios (Table 4) in 1985Po08 
M$A{-2}=-0.02 {I8}, A{-4}=0.00 {I9} (1985Po08) in consistent with D, the level scheme requires Mult. E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=8 {I1} is larger than the calculated value for M1; A{-2}=-0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1985Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$M1 or E3 from |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.005 {I1}, A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1985Po08); T{-1/2} rules out M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E unobserved; based on delayed |g-spectra in (HI,xn|g). 
RI from I|g(120|g)-Branching=6.6% in (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Estimated in 2006Ku26 ({+214}Ra |a decay:68.6 |ms) - |g ray not observed. Experimental limit |<50 in 1979Po19 and 1982Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.065 {I7}, and |g(|q) (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.056 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.015 {I1} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)<0.07 (transition intensity balance - 1982Po03); |a(L)exp=0.144 {I17} (deduced from prompt spectra - 2005Po10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M $from |a(K)exp=0.016 {I4} (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.018 {I1} ; |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0060 {I4}; |a(L3)exp=0.00144 {I15} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M $from |a(K)exp=0.083 {I16} (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.114 {I5}; |a(L)exp=0.012 {I3} (deduced from prompt spectra -2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.068 {I7} (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.0542 {I23}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0295 {I13} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.051 {I5} (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.0462 {I13}, |a(L3)exp=0.0037 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.0074 {I4} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0084 {I9} (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.0097 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0024 {I3}, |a(M)exp=0.00082 {I19} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.024 {I3} and |a(L)exp|?0.008 (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.0167 {I11}, |a(L)exp=0.0035 {I8} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=5.2 {I20} (transition intensity balance - 1982Po03). |a(L)exp=0.51 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.109 {I14} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.036 {I7} (1982Po03); |a(K)exp=0.034 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.0130 {I12}, |a(M)exp=0.0041 {I10} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M $from |a(K)exp=0.0084 {I13} (1982Po03), ; |a(K)exp=0.0092 {I5}; |a(L)exp=0.0029 {I2} |a(M)exp=0.00062 {I16} (2005Po10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M From |a(exp)=0.14 {I9}, |a(exp) determined from analysis of |g-ray intensity balances in coincidence with the 665.3 transition as a direct conversion coefficient measurement was not possible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.010 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0031 {I12} (deduced from prompt spectra - 2005Po10) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Using the Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight method (LWM) (1985ZiZY) of discrepant data 643.7 {I2} (2006Ku06) and 641.9 {I2} (2000He17). 
RI From 2000He17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+210}Rn Adopted dataset in ENSDF database (Mar 2014 update) 
CC$theoretical value from BrIcc code 
$Efficiency-corrected |g-ray intensities for {+210}Rn in coincidence with the projectile and target in 50.5|'-58.0|', 41.9|'-50.5|' and 30.4|'-41.9|' angular ranges were 95 {I17}, 103 {I18} and 108 {I18}, respectively. Corresponding intensities for the targets were: 413 {I36}, 473 {I38}, 417 {I36} 
$From E2 matrix element given in column 2 of Table 4 in 2016Gr07, compiler obtains B(E2)=0.095 {I+36-30}, and correspondingly, B(E2)(W.u.)=13 {I+5-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.10 {I2} (1993Da10). A{-2}=+0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1}. |a(K)exp=0.0071 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I3} (1981Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.04 {I3} (1993Da10). |a(exp)=3.2 {I2} deduced by evaluator from |g-ray transition intensity balance. |a(exp)=4.3 {I4} (1981Po08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.03 {I7}, |a(K)exp<0.04 (1993Da10). A{-2}=-0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}. |a(K)exp|<0.023 (1981Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M$Branching deduced from intensity balance and nonobservation of a |g ray suggests mult=M2 or E3, the latter seems unlikely from systematics of E3 transition strengths in this region (1993Da10). However, the B(M2)(W.u.) of 4.1 {I12} exceeds RUL of 1.00 by 2 to 3 sigma. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M From RUL and |a(exp)>10.5 {I17}, deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance (1981Po08). |a(exp)=11.4 {I17}, deduced by evaluator from |g-ray transition intensity balance using |g-ray data from 1993Da10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$ from P.M. Davidson's Masters Thesis, University of Auckland, Australia (1990). This |g ray not listed in 1993Da10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.23 {I3} (1993Da10). A{-2}=+0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}. |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I11} (1981Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.27 {I3} (1993Da10). A{-2}=+0.40 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6}. |a(K)exp=0.0099 {I12} (1981Po08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.37 {I18}, |a(K)exp=0.004 {I2} (1993Da10). Originally proposed (1993Da10) as pure E1, but both A{-2} and |eK(exp) are consistent with a small M2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 227.72 {I10} in {+212}Fr |e decay, 227.6 {I1} in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) 
M$from ce measurements in {+212}Fr |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g). Other: 422.0 {I2} in (HI,xn|g) 
M$Q is assigned in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) based on DCO ratio, however, the DCO is also consistent with a (D+Q) |DJ=0 transition.t 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$value of 0.11 {I3} from (HI,xn|g) results in a B(M2)(W.u.) of 60 {I4} which significantly exceeds RUL. |d not adopted here. 
E$other: 105.8 {I1} in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I8} in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g), M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 
E$other: 226.3 {I1} in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I8} in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Q is assigned in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) based on DCO ratio, however, the DCO is also consistent with a (D+Q) |DJ=0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$D from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g), |D|p=yes from level scheme 
RI$other: 73 {I14} in {+209}Bi({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M$E3 and M2 are excluded by RUL. E2 remains the only possibility. This point has been discussed in e-mail communication of B. Singh on Dec 18, 2009 with G.D. Dracoulis, and there is general agreement with the conclusions drawn here, and for implied positive parity of 8557-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.34 {I5} (from I(ce(K))=6.1 {I9}; |a(K)exp relative to |a(K)(227.72|g E2)=0.126); K/L23=0.23 {I4}, L2/L3=1.77 {I14}, K:M:N=10:11.0 {I20}:3.1 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0008 {I1}, |a(M)exp=0.00024 {I6} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=0.18 {I1} (1988St17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.007 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.0009 {I1} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=0.349 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.105 {I22} (1979Ho06). Other: A{-2}=0.20 {I1} (1988St17). 
$|g(pol)=0.62 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=1.4 {I5} (1988St17), fits only for mixed E1+M2. 
MR$calculated by the evaluators from the measured |a(exp) with BrIccMixing. 
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I1} (1988St17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp<0.032 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.009 {I1} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=0.361 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.105 {I32} (1979Ho06). Other: A{-2}=0.18 {I1} (1988St17). 
$|g(pol)=0.58 {I10} (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.184 {I29}, A{-4}=0.004 {I43} (1979Ho06), Other: A{-2}=-0.15 {I2} (1988St17). 
$|g(pol)=0.54 {I12} (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.028 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.021 {I3} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=0.664 {I52}, A{-4}=0.003 {I68} (1979Ho06). 
$|g(pol)=0.76 {I29} (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=15 {I6} (1988St17) 
MR$calculated by the evaluators from the measured |a(exp) with BrIccMixing. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp<0.172 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.059 {I8}, |a(M)exp=0.036 {I5} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=0.430 {I51}, A{-4}=0.003 {I72} (1979Ho06) 
$|g(pol)=0.98 {I21} (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.153 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.042 {I5} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=-0.335 {I57}, A{-4}=-0.018 {I81} (1979Ho06) 
$|g(pol)=-0.43 {I16} (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.965 {I32}, A{-4}=0.275 {I43} (1979Ho06) 
$|g(pol)=0.25 {I14} (1979Ho06) 
MR$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.050 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.018 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.006 {I2} (1988St17). 
$A{-2}=-0.213 {I49}, A{-4}=0.008 {I73} (1979Ho06) 
$|g(pol)=-0.39 {I12} (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.212 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I25} (1979Ho06), Other: A{-2}=-0.17 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.07 {I3} (1988St17). 
$|g(pol)=0.33 {I10} (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.574 {I23}, A{-4}=0.025 {I32} (1979Ho06), Other: A{-2}=0.19 {I3} (2009Dr12) 
$|g(pol)=0.79 {I19} (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.323 {I42}, A{-4}=-0.098 {I57} (1979Ho06), Other: A{-2}=0.09 {I4} (2009Dr12) 
$|g(pol)=0.40 {I27} (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M$E3 and M2 are excluded by RUL. E2 remains the only possibility. This point was discussed in email communication with first author and there is general agreement with the conclusions drawn here, and for implied positive parity of the 8557-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.632 {I51}, A{-4}=0.044 {I65} (1979Ho06). Other: A{-2}=0.10 {I4} (2009Dr12) 
$|g(pol)=0.55 {I24} (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 704.3 {I5} from {+213}Fr |e decay and 705.0 {I2} from (HI,xn|g) 
M$from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp measurements (2016Pr08 - {+213}Fr |e decay (34.17 s)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E Others: 894.5 {I2} (1989Lo02), 896.0 (1988Fu10), 894.5 (1983Lo16). 
M |a(K)exp=0.016 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.0059 {I4}, and |a(M)exp=0.0016 {I2} (1988St10). 
Polarization amplitude=-0.04 {I2} (1988Fu10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E Others: 631.7 {I2} (1989Lo02), 632.7 (1988Fu10), 631.7 (1983Lo16). 
M |a(K)exp=0.008 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.0014 {I2}, and |a(M)exp<0.0009 (1988St10). 
Polarization amplitude=-0.01 {I2} (1988Fu10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Other: 905.4 (1989Lo02). This transition was placed by 1989Lo02 to deexcite a level at 8724 + |D' keV, 8831.8+y in this dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Others: 135.3 {I2} (1989Lo02), 135.1 (1988Fu10), 131.3 (1983Lo16). 
A4$For doublet 
M |a(exp)=2.46 {I4} (1988St10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E Other: 767.6 (1988Fu10). 
M E3 is expected from the level scheme; angular distribution is consistent with this multipolarity; no conversion electron line was observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2} (1988St10). The |a(K)exp value is presented for 553|g with a multipolarity M1 in Table 3 (1988St10). Evaluator presents the same |a(K)exp value and M1 multipolarity for both the 552.5|g and 553.1|g from (45/2-) state at 4048.0+x and 31/2- state at 2737.4+x levels, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E Others: 727.8 {I2} (1989Lo02) and 728.7 (1988Fu10). 
M there are disagreements between the experimental Ice's and the angular distributions measured by 1988St10 and by 1989Lo02: |a(K)exp<0.0065, |a(L)exp=0.004 {I1} (1988St10), |a(K)exp=0.019 (1989Lo02); angular distribution: A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.22 {I2} (1988St10), -0.02 {I4} (1989Lo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Comparable 795.5|g from (37/2) level as (E3) in 1983Lo16. 
E Others: 795.8 {I2} (1989Lo02), 797.2 (1988Fu10), 795.5 (1983Lo16). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0048 {I4} and |a(L)exp=0.0013 {I3} (1988St10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement of 842.6|g between the 37/2+ state at 3029.3+x and the 31/2- state at 2186.7+x keV requires the 842.6|g to be an E3 transition, with B(E3)(W.u.)=0.7 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E Others: 412.2 {I2} (1989Lo02), 411.8 (1988Fu10). 
M |a(K)exp=0.035 {I4}, and |a(L)exp=0.005 {I1} (1988St10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other: 551.8 {I2} (1989Lo02). 
M |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2} (1988St10). The |a(K)exp value is presented for 553|g with a multipolarity M1 in Table 3 (1988St10). Evaluator presents the same |a(K)exp value and M1 multipolarity for both the 552.5|g and 553.1|g from (45/2-) state at 4048.0+x and 31/2- state at 2737.4+x levels, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E Other: 1008.1 {I2} (1989Lo02). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0155 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.0049 {I5}, and |a(M)exp=0.0014 {I3} (1988St10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other measurement: 369.4 (1989Lo02). 
M,MR From |a(K)exp=0.22 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.12 {I1} (1988St10). |d=0.00 {I12} using the BriccMixing code. 
Intensities measured by 1989Lo02 suggest that the 350.0|g is stronger, and therefore, should be below the 370.1|g. However, if the above placement between the above |g switched, then placement of 1053.3|g from 5928.8+x keV level to this level (1988St10) do not fit the level energy difference. So, 1988St10 level structure is followed by the evaluator. 1053.3|g is not reported in 1989Lo02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR From |a(K)exp=0.23 {I4}, and |a(L)exp<0.09 (1988St10). There is disagreement between the multipolarity assignments of 1988St10 and 1989Lo02. |a(K)exp=0.23 {I4} was deduced, and M1 was suggested by 1988St10; from a weak K line, 1989Lo02 deduced E1 multipolarity. However, since the 720.1|g (parallel to the cascading 350.0 and 370.1 gammas) and the 370.1|g are (M1), the 350.0|g probably is not E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Other: 165.7 {I2} (1989Lo02). 
M,MR From |a(exp)=3 {I1} (1988St10). |d=0.3 {I8} using the BriccMixing code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E From 1989Lo02. 
M$(E3) from A{-2}/A{-0}=0.36 {I2}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.02 {I3}; |a(K)exp|<0.025 (1989Lo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E From 1989Lo02. 
M$(E3) from A{-2}/A{-0}=0.34 {I7}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.41 {I10}; |a(K)exp|<0.024 (1989Lo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp measurements (2016Pr08). 
MR$The subshell |a(exp) values yield |d=0.00 {I12} using the BriccMixing code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2019Pa45. 
TI$from I(7715|a)=0.123 {I11}. 
M$from the Adopted Gammas. 
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 696 (1981Go06) and 693.6 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 1000 with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 100 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0125 {I9}; |a(L)exp=0.0031 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.00104 {I2}; A{-2}=+0.18 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=+0.29 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.09 {I9} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 446 (1981Go06) and 446.0 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 928 {I6} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 79 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.029 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.011 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.0032 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.19 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=+0.09 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 302 (1981Go06) and 302.5 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 862 {I3} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); |?65 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(K)exp(301.5|g+302.9|g)=0.077 {I4}; |a(L)exp(301.5|g+302.9|g)=0.055 {I3}; |a(M)exp(301.5|g+302.9|g)=0.020 {I3} with both transitions are of E2 character; A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}; A{-4}=-0.05 {I1} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=-0.29 {I3}; A{-4}=0.10 {I4} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 182 (1981Go06) and 182.5 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 446 {I2} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 31 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(M)exp=0.14 {I2}; |a(tot)exp=0.7 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.25 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=+0.12 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 300.4 (1983Lo01) 
RI$others: 560 {I3} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); |?50 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(K)exp(301.5|g+302.9|g)=0.077 {I4}; |a(L)exp(301.5|g+302.9|g)=0.055 {I3}; |a(M)exp(301.5|g+302.9|g)=0.020 {I3} with both transitions of E2 character; A{-2}=+0.22 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I1} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}; A{-4}=+0.10 {I4} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 30 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08). 
M$from A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 32 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08). 
M$from A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 27 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08). 
M$from A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}; A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$other: 465.8 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 367 {I2} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 42 (1983Lo01). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0163 {I15}; |a(L)exp=0.008 {I1}; A{-2}=-0.26 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=-0.19 {I5}; A{-4}=+0.25 {I7} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 22 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08). 
M$from A{-2}=+0.35 {I9}; A{-4}=-0.11 {I13} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$other: 26 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08). 
M$from |a(K)exp=1.0 {I2}; |a(L)exp|<0.25; A{-2}=+0.18 {I4}; A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 280.4 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 229 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 23 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(L)exp|<0.11; |a(M)exp|<0.06; A{-2}=+0.23 {I1}; A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} (1987Dr08). Other: (E1), from A{-2}=-0.15 {I7}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I13} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 13 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08). 
M$from A{-2}=+0.47 {I10}; A{-4}=+0.05 {I15} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 947.1 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 104 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 24 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.008 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.90 {I4} (1987Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 270.1 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 54 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); |?20 (1983Lo01). 
M$from decay scheme (1987Dr08); assigned as E1 based on A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$other: 471.1 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 225 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 48 (1983Lo01). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0150 {I22}; |a(L)exp=0.008 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.24 {I1}; A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=-0.15 {I6}; A{-4}=+0.16 {I10} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 180.3 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 71 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 34 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(L)exp=0.46 {I2}; A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}; A{-4}=+0.06 {I5} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=+0.11 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 162.0 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 46 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 44 (1983Lo01). 
M$|a(L)exp=0.58 {I6}; A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}; A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other 255.5 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 47 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 42 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(tot)exp<0.3; A{-2}=-0.26 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1987Dr08); A{-2}=-0.13 {I3}; A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 768.9 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 10 {I3} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 29 (1983Lo01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.11 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.025 {I4} with K conversion line contaminated by a transition in {+213}Rn (1987Dr08); assigned as E3 based on A{-2}=+0.18 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I10} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 155.0 (1983Lo01). 
RI$others: 3 {I1} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); |<10 (1983Lo01). 
M$on the basis of intensity balance with 226.8|g (1987Dr08); assigned as E1 based on I|g(|q) and intensity balance referring to a incorrect theoretical |a(tot)=8.3 for M1 transition (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 227.4 (1983Lo01). 
RI$other: 8 {I2} with E({+9}Be)=45 MeV (1987Dr08); 16 (1983Lo01). 
M$from A{-2}=+0.16 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.11 {I7} (1983Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$K| x ray/|g|?1 (|a(K)exp|?0.1) (1994Sh02), |a(L)exp=0.14 {I3} (1987El02). Assignment to {+219}Ra |a decay is not definite. 
CC$ overlaps M1 and E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
TI$from a precise measurement of 7675|a abundance (1987El02). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.55 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.10 {I2}, and |a(M)exp=0.020 {I3} (1987El02). 
MR$ from ce data 
E$other value: 316.0 (1994Sh02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(total), |a(K), |a(L), |a(M), |a(N) and |a(O) are theoretical conversion coefficients from BrIcc computer code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=461.9 {I2}, I|g=100 {I5} from 1987Co11 
$A{-2}=0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08{I9} (1987Co11) 
$R(anisotropy)=1.12 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=378.9 {I2}, I|g=67 {I4} from 1987Co11, may be contaminated by a |g in {+219}Ra. 
$R(anisotropy)=1.04 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=385.4 {I2}, I|g=59 {I3} from 1987Co11 
$A{-2}=0.27 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11{I14} (1987Co11) 
$R(anisotropy)=1.13 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=419.4 {I2}, I|g=56 {I3} from 1987Co11, may be contaminated by a |g in {+218}Ra. 
$R(anisotropy)=1.18 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=465.9 {I2}, I|g=13{I2} from 1987Co11, assigned as deexciting a 10+ state at 2111.5 keV. 
$R(anisotropy)=1.26 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition was not observed. Its existence was deduced by 1997Li12 from observation of the 88.9|g in coincidence with the 6662|a feeding the 93.02 level. 
E$deduced by evaluators from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition was not observed. Its existence was deduced by 1997Li12 from observation of the 88.9|g in coincidence with the 6662|a to the 93-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 93.1 {I2} (1989Ac01), 89 {I2} (1961Ru06) 
RI$Others: 24 {I3} (1989Ac01), 115 {I16} (1961Ru06, presumably includes the Rn K-x rays and the 88.9|g) 
M$(L1+L2)/L3=2.2 {i2} (1989Ac01; not corrected for possible ceK(174|g)contribution on L1 line). Consistent with E2 but there might be very small contribution of M1. 
CC$From BrIcc code assuming E2 because the contribution of M1 is very small. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 56.16 {I5} (1997Li12) and 56.3 {I1} (2015Ah04). Other: 56.2 {I2} (1989Ac01) 
RI$from 1997Li12. Others: 13.7 {I17} (2015Ah04), 3.1 {I4} (1989Ac01) 
M$deduced from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 149.2 {I1} (1997Li12) and 149.12 {I3} (2015Ah04). Others: 149.0 {I1} (1989Ac01), 152 {i2} (1961Ru06) 
M$(L1+L2)/L3=1.72 {i9} (1989Ac01), |a(L1+L2)exp=0.46 {I12}, |a(L3)exp=0.34 {I9} (2015Ah04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$This transition was not observed. It would be obscured by the K-x rays. It is tentatively proposed by 1997Li12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 174.3 {I1} (1997Li12) and 174.28 {I8} (2015Ah04) Others: 174.1 {I2} (1989Ac01), 176 {i2} (1961Ru06). 
RI$weighted average of 17 {I2} (1997Li12) and 16.6 {I17} (2015Ah04). Others: 18 {I2} (1989Ac01), 15 {I4} (1961Ru06) 
M$deduced from intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 324.22 {I5} (1976Ku08) and 324.31 {I1} (1995Ko54). 
RI$from 1969Pe17 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.059 (1974Va28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 144.0 {I5} (1976Ku08) and 144.8 {I5} (1995Ko54). 
RI$from 1976Ku08. Other: <0.00025 {I7} (1995Ko54) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 472.5 {I1} (1976Ku08) 
RI$other: 0.0040 {I3} (1976Ku08) 
M$possibly E1 from |a(K)exp|?0.01 (|a(ce) and |a|g coin data of 1963Le17); but a definitive assignment could not be made from the available data (according to private communication from author of 1963Le17 to 1987El12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp|?0.025 (1963Le17) 
E$other: 515.6 {I1} (1976Ku08) 
RI$other: 0.0015 {I1} (1976Ku08) 
M$from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from level energy. Measured values are E|g=4.1 {I1} (1998Sh02), 4.4 (1972HeYM, ce data) 
TI$deduced by evaluators from transition intensity balance, assuming no direct |a feeding to this level 
M,MR$M1+E2, |d=0.062 {I3} from ce data (1974Ri05). 1972HeYM also claim dominant M1 from N-subshell ratios. BriccMixing also gives dominant M1, but is also consistent with E2(+M3) with |d=0.0121 {I13}. 1998Sh02 argue that ce data for N1 shell in 1974Ri05 is not independent of tails of peaks for N2 and N3 shells, and that the data could be consistent with pure E2 also. Evaluators consider the multipolarity assignment as tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. Measured values are E|g=10.1 {I1} (1998Sh02), 10.0 (1972HeYM, ce data) 
RI$deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance of 421 {I5} relative units at 14.4 level, and I|g(10.0|g)/I|g(14.4|g)=0.85 {I9} from measured ce intensities (1974Ri05), and theoretical |a for assigned multipolarities. 
M$from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from level energy. Measured values are E|g=14.4 {I1} (1998Sh02), 14.4 (1972HeYM) 
RI$deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 14.4 level, and I|g(10.0|g)/I|g(14.4|g)=0.85 {I9} from measured ce intensities and theoretical |a (1974Ri05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=122.32 {I7} (1998Sh02), 122.319 {I10} (1976Bl13), 122.3 {I1} (1972HeYM), 122.4 {I2} (1970Kr01), 122.3 {I1} (1970Da08), 122.3 {I2} (1968Br17), 122 (1966Po02), 122.2 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=21.0 {I6} (2021Si11), 21.6 {I12} (2019Ma02), 21.79 {I11} (2015Co07), 21.63 {I27} (2015Ko06), 21.38 {I27} (2015Pi10), 21.2 {I6} (1998Sh02), 20 {I3} (1976Bl13), 19.6 {I15} (1972HeYM), 21.3 {I6} (1970Kr01), 21 {I4} (1968Br17). Other: 26 {I4} (1970Da08) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 1.226 {I36} (2021Si11), 1.39 {I6} (2019Ma02), 1.312 {I6} (2015Co07), 1.304 {I12} (2015Ko06), 1.30 {I1} (2015Pi10), 1.01 {I11} (1976Bl13), 1.19 {I5} (1972HeYM), 1.19 {I2} (1970Kr01), 1.33 {I13} (1970Da08), 1.15 {I15} (1968Br17). 
MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.126 {I11} from analysis of |a|g(|q), and recommended |d=-0.128 {I9} as an averaged value. Evaluators obtain |d=0.127 {I15} using BrIccMixing code. Pure M1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$5747|a(122|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.043 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I37} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.130 {I20}, assuming 5/2 |) 7/2 transition 
$5747|a(122|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.046 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.015 {I30} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=31.9 {I1} (1998Sh02), 31.992 {I30} (1976Bl13), 31.6 {I2} (1970Kr01), 31.2 (1957Pi31). 
RI$from 1970Kr01. Other: 0.0024 (1998Sh02). I|g=0.0102 {I11} (1976Bl13) is too large to be consistent with 52% |a feeding to the 158 level. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.055 {I6} (1976Bl13), 0.00010 {I2} (1970Kr01) 
M$>80% E2 or |d(E2/M1)>2 from ce data (1970Kr01). E2 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=144.23 {I3} (1998Sh02), 144.235 {I10} (1976Bl13), 144.2 {I1} (1972HeYM), 144.3 {I2} (1970Kr01), 144.19 {I4} (1970Da08), 144.2 {I2} (1968Br17), 144 (1966Po02), 144.2 (1957Pi31) 
$I|g=56.9 {I10} (2021Si11), 57.7 {I31} (2019Ma02), 57.8 {I3} (2015Co07), 57.5 {I6} (2015Ko06), 57.7 {I8} (2015Pi10), 57.3 {I19} (1998Sh02), 57 {I8} (1976Bl13), 62 {I6} (1972HeYM), 61 {I9} (1970Da08), 57.9 {I17} (1970Kr01), 57 {I7} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 3.32 {I6} (2021Si11), 3.71 {I15} (2019Ma02), 3.481 {I16} (2015Co07), 3.469 {I20} (2015Ko06), 3.51 {I3} (2015Pi10), 2.90 {I30} (1976Bl13), 3.72 {I25} (1972HeYM), 3.24 {I7} (1970Kr01), 3.13 {I32} (1970Da08), 3.1 {I3} (1968Br17). 
MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.11 {I3} from analysis of |a|g(|q) data, and recommended |d=-0.12 {I1}, combined with results of ce data. Evaluators obtain 0.121 {I17} using BrIccMixing code. 1998Sh02 cited |d=0.12 {I2} from ce data. 
$5716|a(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.380 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.037 {I30} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.068 {I22}, assuming 5/2 |) 5/2 transition 
$5716|a(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.322 {I42}, A{-4}=-0.074 {I50} (1970Da08) 
$5716|a(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.37 {I4} (1998Sh02), implies negative |d 
$5716|a(144|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.364 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.018 {I18} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=154.20 {I3} (1998Sh02), 154.209 {I10} (1976Bl13), 154.2 {I1} (1972HeYM), 154.3 {I2} (1970Kr01), 154.18 {I3} (1970Da08), 154.30 {I15} (1968Br17), 154 (1966Po02), 154.1 (1957Pi31) 
$I|g=100.0 {I14} (2021Si11), 100.0 {I36} (2019Ma02), 100 (2015Co07), 100.0 {I8} (2015Ko06), 100.0 {I10} (2015Pi10), 100.0 {I24} (1998Sh02), 100 {I10} (1976Bl13), 100 {I6} (1972HeYM), 100 {I10} (1970Da08), 100.0 {I20} (1970Kr01), 100 {I7} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 5.83 {I8} (2021Si11), 6.43 {I23} (2019Ma02), 6.02 {I3} (2015Co07), 6.03 {I5} (2015Ko06), 6.08 {I6} (2015Pi10), 5.03 {I51} (1976Bl13), 6.04 {I35} (1972HeYM), 5.58 {I11} (1970Kr01), 5.23 {I52} (1970Da08), 5.4 {I4} (1968Br17). 
M,MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.0150 {I75} from analysis of |a|g(|q) data, consistent with pure M1. BrIccMixing gives 0.015 {I13}. 1998Sh02 cited |d(E2/M1)=0.08 {I6} from ce data 
$5716|a(154|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.094 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.054 {I15} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.033 {I7}, assuming 5/2 |) 7/2 transition 
$5716|a(154|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.099 {I29}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I33} (1970Da08) 
$5716|a(154|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I2} (1998Sh02), implies negative |d 
$5716|a(154|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.111 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.019 {I15} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=158.65 {I5} (1998Sh02), 158.634 {I10} (1976Bl13), 158.6 {I1} (1972HeYM), 158.7 {I2} (1970Kr01), 158.62 {I4} (1970Da08), 158.7 {I2} (1968Br17), 158 (1966Po02), 158.6 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=12.4 {I6} (2019Ma02), 12.27 {I6} (2015Co07), 12.22 {I17} (2015Ko06), 12.2 {I4} (1998Sh02), 12.1 {I17} (1976Bl13), 11.9 {I11} (1972HeYM), 12.2 {I4} (1970Kr01). Others: 14.7 {I22} (1970Da08), 13.0 {I16} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.795 {I30} (2019Ma02), 0.749 {I4} (2015Co07), 0.737 {I8} (2015Ko06), 0.612 {I60} (1976Bl13), 0.72 {I5} (1972HeYM), 0.683 {I14} (1970Kr01), 0.76 {I8} (1970Da08), 0.70 {I7} (1968Br17). 
MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.205 {I18} from analysis of |a|g(|q) data, and recommended an averaged value of |d=-0.205 {I18}, consistent with result from ce data. BrIccMixing code gives 0.20 {I3}. 1998Sh02 cited |d=0.23 {I4}. 
$5716|a(159|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I3} (1998Sh02), implies negative |d 
$5716|a(159|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.053 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.026 {I35} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=110.8 {I1} (1998Sh02), 110.857 {I10} (1976Bl13), 110.8 {I3} (1972HeYM), 110.9 {I1} (1970Kr01), 110.8 {I1} (1970Da08), 110.8 {I2} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.850 {I17} (2015Co07), 0.93 {I6} (2015Ko06), 1.02 {I8} (1998Sh02), 1.05 {I15} (1976Bl13), 1.08 {I15} (1970Da08), 0.81 {I7} (1970Kr01), 1.04 {I17} (1968Br17). Other: 0.47 {I20} (1972HeYM) seems discrepant. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0512 {I10} (2015Co07), 0.056 {I6} (2015Ko06), 0.053 {I5} (1976Bl13), 0.029 {I12} (1972HeYM), 0.045 {I4} (1970Kr01), 0.056 {I6} (1970Da08), 0.056 {I8} (1968Br17). 
$5607|a(111|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.99 {I46}, A{-4}=-0.64 {I39} (1970Kr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=255.1 {I2} (1998Sh02), 255.3 {I2} (1976Bl13), 255.0 {I5} (1972HeYM), 256 (1970Kr01), 255.0 {I6} (1970Da08), 255.2 {I3} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.829 {I21} (2015Co07), 0.73 {I11} (2015Ko06), 0.93 {I12} (1998Sh02), 0.87 {I21} (1976Bl13), 1.0 {I4} (1970Da08), 1.1 {I3} (1968Br17). Other: 0.54 {I16} (1972HeYM) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0499 {I13} (2015Co07), 0.044 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.044 {I9} (1976Bl13), 0.032 {I10} (1972HeYM), |?0.04 (1970Kr01), 0.05 {I2} (1970Da08), 0.060 {I15} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=269.47 {I3} (1998Sh02), 269.462 {I10} (1976Bl13), 269.4 {I1} (1972HeYM), 269.6 {I2} (1970Kr01), 269.41 {I3} (1970Da08), 271.0 (1968Br17), 270 (1966Po02), 269.6 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=219 {I11} (2019Ma02), 221.9 {I11} (2015Co07), 218.2 {I30} (2015Ko06), 217.8 {I29} (2015Pi10). Others: 240.5 {I26} (2021Si11), 244 {I8} (1998Sh02), 260 {I30} (1976Bl13), 225 {I16} (1972HeYM), 260 {I40} (1970Da08), 243 {I7} (1970Kr01), 260 {I40} (1968Br17); all appear to be systematically higher as compared to the more recent measurements, although, except for value in 2021Si11, others agree within the uncertainties. Weighted average of all the values is 224.1 {I23}, but with reduced |h{+2}=6.9, as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.9. NRM weighted average of all the data is 222.1 {I16}, with reduced |h{+2}=2.8, where uncertainty in 2021Si11 gets adjusted to 7.1 from 2.6. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 14.02 {I15} (2021Si11), 14.1 {I5} (2019Ma02), 13.37 {I7} (2015Co07), 13.16 {I15} (2015Ko06), 13.24 {I12} (2015Pi10), 13.41 {I50} (1976Bl13), 13.6 {I6} (1972HeYM), 13.6 {I3} (1970Kr01), 13.6 {I10} (1970Da08), 14.0 {I15} (1968Br17). 
MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.149 {I4} from analysis of |a|g(|q) data, and recommended the same value for |d. BrIccMixing code gives 0.149 {I10}. M1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=117.7 {I24}:19:2.3 {I1}:0.1 {I1}, weighted average of ce data from 1970Da08 and 1970Kr01. 
$5607|a(269|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.180 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I6} (1974Ri05) 
$5607|a(269|g)(lin pol)(|q): B{-2}=+0.019 {I7}, B{-4}=0.0007 {I22} (1974Ri05). 
$5607|a(269|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.181 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.007 {I22} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.140 {I12}, assuming 3/2 |) 3/2 transition 
$5607|a(269|g)(lin pol)(|q): B{-2}=+0.023 {I7}, B{-4}=-0.0023 {I27} (cited by 1974Ri05 from 1970CaZT). 
$5607|a(269|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.195 {I45}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I48} (1970Da08) 
$5607|a(269|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.184 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I15} (1972HeYM) 
$5607|a(269|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.18 (1957Pi31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=179.6 {I1} (1998Sh02), 179.518 {I55} (1976Bl13), 179.7 {I2} (1972HeYM), 179.7 {I2} (1970Kr01), 179.6 {I3} (1970Da08), 179.6 {I3} (1968Br17), 180 (1966Po02), 179.8 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=2.50 {I21} (2019Ma02), 2.678 {I18} (2015Co07), 2.54 {I10} (2015Ko06), 2.68 {I25} (1998Sh02), 2.7 {I4} (1976Bl13), 2.6 {I4} (1972HeYM), 2.9 {I5} (1970Da08), 2.6 {I7} (1970Kr01), 2.8 {I8} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.161 {I12} (2019Ma02), 0.1613 {I10} (2015Co07), 0.153 {I6} (2015Ko06), 0.136 {I14} (1976Bl13), 0.158 {I20} (1972HeYM), 0.146 {I4} (1970Kr01), 0.150 {I18} (1970Da08), 0.15 {I4} (1968Br17). 
EKC$not completely separated from Auger lines (1970Kr01) 
M$M1+E2 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$5540|a(179|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.17 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I6} (1970Kr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=323.90 {I5} (1998Sh02), 323.870 {I10} (1976Bl13), 323.9 {I1} (1972HeYM), 324.1 {I2} (1970Kr01), 323.88 {I5} (1970Da08), 323.90 {I15} (1968Br17), 324 (1966Po02), 323.9 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=59.9 {I34} (2019Ma02), 60.7 {I3} (2015Co07), 60.7 {I6} (2015Ko06), 59.7 {I6} (2015Pi10), 60 {I5} (1972HeYM). Others: 65.4 {I10} (2021Si11), 70.0 {I21} (1998Sh02), 71 {I8} (1976Bl13), 70 {I10} (1970Da08), 71.5 {I20} (1970Kr01), 69 {I9} (1968Br17); all seem systematically higher than some of the recent measurements and 1972HeYM. Weighted average of all the values is 61.1 {I6} with reduced |h{+2}=7.4 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.8. NRM weighted average is 60.7 {I4} with reduced |h{+2}=2.7, where uncertainties in 2021Si11, 1998Sh02 and 1970Kr01 get adjusted upward by a factor of |?2. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 3.81 {I6} (2021Si11), 3.85 {I17} (2019Ma02), 3.655 {I18} (2015Co07), 3.661 {I21} (2015Ko06), 3.63 {I2} (2015Pi10), 3.60 {I18} (1976Bl13), 3.65 {I15} (1972HeYM), 4.00 {I8} (1970Kr01), 3.60 {I36} (1970Da08), 3.7 {I4} (1968Br17). 
MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.035 {I49} from analysis of |a|g(|q) data, and recommended pure M1. BrIccMixing gives |d=0.38 {I4}, but with large reduced |h{+2} of 14. M1+E2 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$5540|a(324|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.040 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.021 {I20} (1974Ri05) 
$5540|a(324|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.033 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I20} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.058 {I14}, assuming 3/2 |) 5/2 transition 
$5540|a(324|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.007 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.036 {I30} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=333.9 {I1} (1998Sh02), 334.039 {I56} (1976Bl13), 333.9 {I1} (1972HeYM), 334.4 {I2} (1970Kr01), 333.8 {I1} (1970Da08), 333.9 {I2} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=1.255 {I9} (2015Co07), 1.24 {I5} (2015Ko06). Others: 1.78 {II1} (1998Sh02), 1.45 {I25} (1976Bl13), 1.6 {I3} (1972HeYM), 2.4 {I6} (1970Da08), 1.85 {I15} (1970Kr01), 1.6 {I3} (1968Br17); all appear to be systematically higher than the recent measurements. Weighted average of all the values is 1.261 {I22} with reduced |h{+2}=6.4 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.0. NRM weighted average is 1.257 {I15} with reduced |h{+2}=2.8, where uncertainty in 1998Sh02 gets adjusted upward to 0.21 and that in 1970Kr01 to 0.24. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0756 {I6} (2015Co07), 0.0750 {I29} (2015Ko06), 0.073 {I10} (1976Bl13), 0.094 {I15} (1972HeYM), 0.103 {I8} (1970Kr01), 0.124 {I24} (1970Da08), 0.086 {I13} (1968Br17). 
M$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1), |d>3.2, also consistent with E1. E2 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=338.32 {I5} (1998Sh02), 338.280 {I10} (1976Bl13), 338.3 {I1} (1972HeYM), 338.6 {I2} (1970Kr01), 338.3 {I1} (1970Da08), 338.3 {I1} (1968Br17), 338 (1966Po02), 338.0 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=42.9 {I19} (2019Ma02), 43.25 {I21} (2015Co07), 43.4 {I4} (2015Ko06), 42.6 {I5} (2015Pi10), 43 {I3} (1972HeYM). Others: 48.9 {I9} (2021Si11), 49.8 {I16} (1998Sh02), 49 {I6} (1976Bl13), 50 {I8} (1970Da08), 51 {I12} (1970Kr01), 50 {I6} (1968Br17); all appear to be systematically higher than some of the recent measurements and 1972HeYM. Weighted average of all the values is 43.5 {I4} with reduced |h{+2}=5.9 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.8. NRM weighted average is 43.3 {I3} with reduced |h{+2}=1.9, where uncertainty in 2021Si11 gets adjusted to 2.1 and that in 1998Sh02 to 2.5. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 2.85 {I5} (2021Si11), 2.76 {I10} (2019Ma02), 2.605 {I13} (2015Co07), 2.614 {I13} (2015Ko06), 2.59 {I2} (2015Pi10), 2.48 {I12} (1976Bl13), 2.61 {I10} (1972HeYM), 2.88 {I7} (1970Kr01), 2.59 {I27} (1970Da08), 2.70 {I25} (1968Br17). 
MR$2016Jo02 deduced |d(Q/D)=-0.235 {I30} from analysis of |a|g(|q), and recommended the same |d value. BrIccMixing gives 0.23 {I5}. M1+E2 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$5540|a(338|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.177 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.028 {I17} (1974Ri05) 
$5540|a(338|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.183 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.025 {I28} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.138 {I15}, assuming 3/2 |) 3/2 transition 
$5540|a(338|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.206 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.040 {I30} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=328.4 {I1} (1998Sh02), 328.381 {I29} (1976Bl13), 328.5 {I1} (1972HeYM), 328.7 {I2} (1970Kr01), 328.5 {I1} (1970Da08), 328.30 {I15} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=3.36 {I3} (2015Co07), 3.28 {I7} (2015Ko06), 3.7 {I12} (1998Sh02), 3.7 {I5} (1976Bl13), 2.7 {I5} (1972HeYM), 3.1 {I7} (1970Da08), 3.70 {I18} (1970Kr01), 3.7 {I5} (1968Br17). Small contribution (~2.2%) from {+211}Po and {+207}Tl decays. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.2021 {I16} (2015Co07, some contribution from {+211}Po and {+207}Tl decays), 0.198 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.188 {I11} (1976Bl13), 0.161 {I25} (1972HeYM), 0.207 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.162 {I32} (1970Da08), 0.20 {I2} (1968Br17). 
M$E1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=342.80 {I7} (1998Sh02), 342.898 {I44} (1976Bl13), 342.9 {I1} (1972HeYM), 342.3 (1970Kr01), 342.9 {I1} (1970Da08), 342.8 {I2} (1968Br17) 
RI$from 2015Ko06. Evaluators assume that 2015Ko06 have corrected the contribution (~18%) from {+211}Pb decay. Others: 3.25 {I4} (2015Co07), 3.9 {I3} (1998Sh02), 3.9 {I5} (1976Bl13), 1.6 {I4} (1972HeYM), 3.9 {I11} (1970Da08), 4.14 {I23} (1970Kr01), 3.7 {I5} (1968Br17). About 18% of the intensity could belong to the decay of {+211}Pb 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.1958 {I21} (2015Co07, some contribution from {+211}Pb decay), 0.175 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.200 {I16} (1976Bl13), 0.097 {I22} (1972HeYM), 0.231 {I12} (1970Kr01), 0.21 {I6} (1970Da08), 0.20 {I2} (1968Br17). 
M$E1 or E2 from ce data (1970Kr01). E1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=249.3 {I1} (1998Sh02), 249.4 {I3} (1972HeYM), 249.3 {I5} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.622 {I14} (2015Co07), 0.60 {I10} (2015Ko06), 0.68 {I17} (1998Sh02), 0.7 {I3} (1972HeYM), 0.67 {I19} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0375 {I9} (2015Co07), 0.036 {I6} (2015Ko06), 0.040 {I18} (1972HeYM), 0.036 {I10} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=361.7 {I1} (1998Sh02), 362.062 {I17} (1976Bl13), 361.3 {I2} (1972HeYM), 361.7 {I3} (1970Kr01), 361.5 {I3} (1970Da08), 361.6 {I5} (1968Br17), 362 (1966Po02). Uncertainty increased to 0.085 keV for least-squares fit. 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.435 {I33} (2015Ko06), 0.49 {I12} (1998Sh02). Others: 0.566 {I12} (2015Co07, assigned to {+211}Pb decay), 0.74 {I15} (1968Br17), 0.80 {I10} (1976Bl13), 0.53 {I14} (1972HeYM), 0.96 {I21} (1970Da08), 0.82 {I9} (1970Kr01). The 362+363 doublet is separated only in 2015Ko06, 1998Sh02 and 1968Br17. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0341 {I7} (2015Co07, assigned to {+211}Bi decay), 0.0262 {I20} (2015Ko06), 0.040 {I3} (1976Bl13), 0.032 {I8} (1972HeYM), 0.046 {I5} (1970Kr01), 0.05 {I1} (1970Da08), 0.04 {I1} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=371.7 {I1} (1998Sh02), 371.675 {I15} (1976Bl13), 371.9 {I1} (1972HeYM), 372.0 {I3} (1970Kr01), 371.5 {I3} (1970Da08), 371.7 {I2} (1968Br17), 371 (1966Po02), 371.1 (1957Pi31). Uncertainty increased to 0.075 keV for least-squares fit. 
RI$weighted average of I|g=7.1 {I4} (2019Ma02), 7.22 {I5} (2015Co07), 8.3 {I10} (1976Bl13). Others: 8.3 {I7} (2015Ko06), 8.5 {I4} (1998Sh02), 9.5 {I11} (1972HeYM), 10.5 {I19} (1970Da08), 8.66 {I24} (1970Kr01), 10.2 {I13} (1968Br17); all seem systematically high. Weighted average of all the values is 7.31 {I13} with reduced |h{+2}=7.3 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.0. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.457 {I18} (2019Ma02), 0.435 {I3} (2015Co07), 0.50 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.57 {I5} (1972HeYM), 0.484 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.54 {I8} (1970Da08), 0.55 {I5} (1968Br17). 
M$M1+E2 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$5502|a(338|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.292 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I38} (1970Kr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=376.1 {I2} (1998Sh02), 376.0 {I3} (1970Da08), 376.0 (1970Kr01), 377.0 {I6} (1968Br17, tentative assignment) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.092 {I5} (2015Co07), 0.093 {I10} (2015Ko06). Others: 0.22 {I7} (1998Sh02), <0.08 (1972HeYM), |?0.23 {I8} (1970Da08), <0.18 (1970Kr01), |?0.13 (1968Br17). 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0056 {I4} (2015Co07), 0.0056 {I6} (2015Ko06), <0.005 (1972HeYM), <0.01 (1970Kr01), 0.012 {I4} (1970Da08), |?0.007 (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=34.5 {I2} (1998Sh02), 33.6 {I5} (1968Br17) 
$I|g=1.9 {I6} (1968Br17, uncertain I|g). No intensity given by 1998Sh02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.319 {I15} (2015Co07), 0.292 {I22} (2015Ko06), 0.27 {I12} (1998Sh02). Other: 0.74 {I15} (1968Br17). In other studies, 362-363 doublet is not separated. See also I|g comment for 362.05|g 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0192 {I9} (2015Co07), 0.0176 {I13} (2015Ko06), 0.04 {I1} (1968Br17, for doublet). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=372.9 {I1} (1998Sh02), 372.881 {I61} (1976Bl13), 373.3 (1970Kr01), 373.0 {I4} (1968Br17, uncertain) 
RI$unweighted average of I|g=1.882 {I22} (2015Co07), 0.85 {I7} (2015Ko06), 0.88 {I9} (1998Sh02, no uncertainty stated by authors, 10% uncertainty assumed by evaluators), 1.9 {I3} (1976Bl13). Others: |?0.90 (1970Kr01), |?1.8 (1968Br17). 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.1133 {I13} (2015Co07), 0.051 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.098 {I11} (1976Bl13), <0.08 (1972HeYM), |?0.05 (1970Kr01), |?0.1 (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=106.7 {I1} (1998Sh02), 106.783 {I32} (1976Bl13), 106.5 {I3} (1972HeYM), 106.8 {I2} (1970Kr01), 106.8 {I2} (1970Da08), 106.6 {I3} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.354 {I18} (2015Co07), 0.42 {I3} (1998Sh02), 0.41 {I6} (1976Bl13), 0.43 {I14} (1972HeYM), 0.42 {I11} (1970Da08), 0.34 {I7} (1970Kr01), 0.43 {I8} (1968Br17). 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0213 {I11} (2015Co07), 0.021 {I2} (1976Bl13), 0.026 {I8} (1972HeYM), 0.019 {I4} (1970Kr01), 0.022 {I6} (1970Da08), 0.023 {I4} (1968Br17). 
M$M1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=175.5 {I2} (1998Sh02), 175.5 {I4} (1972HeYM), 175.7 {I2} (1970Kr01), 176.0 {I3} (1970Da08) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.2620 {I17} (2015Co07), 0.284 {I35} (2015Ko06), 0.34 {I7} (1998Sh02), 0.34 {I9} (1972HeYM), 0.24 {I7} (1970Kr01). Doublet in 1970Da08 and 1968Br17 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.01578 {I10} (2015Co07), 0.0171 {I21} (2015Ko06), 0.021 {I5} (1972HeYM), 0.014 {I4} (1970Kr01), 0.043 {I6} (1970Da08, for 176+177), 0.03 {I1} (1968Br17, for doublet). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=430.6 {I3} (1998Sh02), 430.5 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.34 {I4} (2015Co07), 0.393 {I9} (2015Ko06), 0.34 {I10} (1998Sh02), 0.32 {I9} (1972HeYM). There could be |?28% contribution from a |g in {+211}Pb decay, which may or may not have been considered in the quoted intensities. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0206 {I19} (2015Co07, mixed with line from {+211}Pb decay), 0.0237 {I5} (2015Ko06), 0.019 {I5} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=445.06 {I5} (1998Sh02), 445.031 {I12} (1976Bl13), 444.9 {I1} (1972HeYM), 445.5 (1970Kr01), 444.92 {I7} (1970Da08), 445.0 {I1} (1968Br17), 446 (1966Po02), 445.5 (1957Pi31) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=22.1 {I14} (2021Si11), 19.9 {I11} (2019Ma02), 20.22 {I10} (2015Co07), 20.27 {I22} (2015Ko06), 20.02 {I23} (2015Pi10), 22.7 {I9} (1998Sh02), 22 {I3} (1976Bl13), 20.7 {I20} (1972HeYM), 25 {I4} (1970Da08), 22.5 {I20} (1968Br17). I|g=26.8 {I20} (1970Kr01) seems discrepant 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 1.29 {I8} (2021Si11), 1.28 {I5} (2019Ma02), 1.218 {I6} (2015Co07), 1.222 {I6} (2015Ko06), 1.217 {I8} (2015Pi10), 1.14 {I5} (1976Bl13), 1.25 {I10} (1972HeYM), 1.50 {I11} (1970Kr01), 1.27 {I13} (1970Da08), 1.22 {I5} (1968Br17). 
M$from ce data (1970Kr01). M1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 
$5434|a(338|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.106 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I30} (1970Kr01); deduced |d=-0.188 {I14}, assuming 3/2 |) 3/2 transition and +0.247 {I12} for 5/2 |) 3/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=104.0 {I2} (1998Sh02), 104.254 {I66} (1976Bl13), 103.7 {I4} (1972HeYM), 103.7 {I3} (1968Br17) 
$I|g from 2015Co07. Others: 0.34 {I5} (1998Sh02), 0.35 {I6} (1976Bl13), 0.28 {I17} (1972HeYM), 0.26 {4} (1968Br17), all seem high as compared to most precise value in 2015Co07 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0119 {I6} (2015Co07), 0.018 {I2} (1976Bl13), 0.017 {I10} (1972HeYM), 0.014 {I2} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=177.3 {I1} (1998Sh02), 177.4 {I3} (1972HeYM), 177.4 {I2} (1970Kr01), 177.3 {I3} (1970Da08), 176.8 {I4} (1968Br17) 
$I|g=0.86 {I6} (2019Ma02), 0.708 {I13} (2015Co07), 0.63 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.83 {I8} (1998Sh02), 0.79 {I14} (1972HeYM), 0.83 {I8} (1970Kr01). Doublet in 1970Da08 and 1968Br17 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.055 {I3} (2019Ma02), 0.0426 {I8} (2015Co07), 0.0381 {I23} (2015Ko06), 0.047 {I8} (1972HeYM), 0.046 {I4} (1970Kr01), 0.043 {I6} (1970Da08, doublet), 0.03 {I1} (1968Br17, possible doublet). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=288.1 {I1} (1998Sh02), 288.183 {I27} (1976Bl13), 288.1 {I2} (1972HeYM), 288.3 {I2} (1970Kr01), 288.4 {I3} (1970Da08), 287.8 {I3} (1968Br17), 288 {I1} (1966Po02) 
$I|g=1.96 {I12} (2019Ma02), 2.488 {I27} (2015Co07), 2.42 {I7} (2015Ko06), 2.1 {I4} (1972HeYM). NRM weighted average taken, where uncertainty in 2019Ma02 gets adjusted to 0.23. Others: 2.80 {I10} (1998Sh02), 2.8 {I4} (1976Bl13), 2.8 {I5} (1970Da08), 2.82 {I13} (1970Kr01), 3.0 {I5} (1968Br17), all seem high as compared to some recent values. Weighted average of all the values is 2.49 {I5} with reduced |h{+2}=4.9 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.9. NRM weighted average of all the values is 2.50 {I4}, with reduced |h{+2}=2.9, and uncertainty in 2019Ma02 adjusted to 0.21. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.126 {I6} (2019Ma02), 0.1498 {I16} (2015Co07), 0.146 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.144 {I7} (1976Bl13), 0.127 {I18} (1972HeYM), 0.158 {I7} (1970Kr01), 0.147 {I16} (1970Da08), 0.16 {I2} (1968Br17). 
M$from ce data (1970Kr01). E1 listed by 1998Sh02 from ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=432.4 {I3} (1998Sh02), 432.08 {I11} (1976Bl13), 432.6 {I2} (1972HeYM), 432.4 (1970Kr01), 432.0 {I6} (1970Da08), 431.8 {I2} (1968Br17) 
$I|g=0.493 {I23} (2015Co07), 0.50 {I5} (2015Ko06), 0.61 {I5} (1998Sh02), 0.49 {I9} (1976Bl13), 0.54 {I14} (1972HeYM), 0.63 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.62 {I9} (1968Br17). Other: |?0.57 (1970Da08) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0297 {I14} (2015Co07), 0.0299 {I28} (2015Ko06), 0.025 {I4} (1976Bl13), 0.033 {I8} (1972HeYM), 0.036 {I5} (1970Kr01), |?0.03 (1970Da08), 0.034 {I4} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.132 {I11} (2019Ma02), 0.206 {I25} (2015Co07), 0.049 {I24} (1998Sh02). Doublet in 1998Sh02, other component has I|g=0.073 {I24}. 2019Ma02 and 2015Co07 report a single line. I|g is adopted from 1998Sh02, based on the split intensity in this work. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0085 {I7} (2019Ma02), 0.0124 {I15} (2015Co07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=387.6 {I2} (1998Sh02), 388.0 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
RI$from 2015Co07, authors incorrectly mention contribution from {+219}Rn decay, should be for 383|g instead. Others: 0.27 {I10} (1998Sh02), 0.23 {I9} (1972HeYM), |?0.074 (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0052 {I7} (2015Co07), 0.014 {I5} (1972HeYM), |?0.004 (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.022 {I8} (2015Co07), 0.024 {I10} (1998Sh02). I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0013 {I5} (2015Co07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=165.9 {I2} (1998Sh02), 165.5 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
$I|g=0.058 {I24} (2019Ma02), 0.10 {I5} (1998Sh02), 0.08 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0037 {I15} (2019Ma02), 0.005 {I3} (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=383.0 {I5} (1972HeYM), 382.5 {I5} (1970Da08), 383.0 {I6} (1968Br17, uncertain assignment). This |g is not reported by 1998Sh02 
RI$from I|g=0.038 {I9} (2015Co07), with subtraction of 18% contribution from {+219}Rn decay. Others: 0.07 {I5} (1972HeYM), 0.29 {I11} (1970Da08), |?0.04 (1968Br17). 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0023 {I6} (2015Co07), 0.004 {I3} (1972HeYM), 0.015 {I5} (1970Da08), |?0.006 (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=527.6 {I1} (1998Sh02), 527.611 {I13} (1976Bl13), 527.0 {I6} (1972HeYM), 527.5 {I5} (1970Kr01), 527.0 {I7} (1970Da08), 527.4 {I3} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=1.09 {I6} (2019Ma02), 1.094 {I13} (2015Co07), 1.06 {I4} (2015Ko06), 1.24 {I8} (1998Sh02), 1.08 {I13} (1976Bl13), 1.1 {I3} (1972HeYM), 1.3 {I3} (1970Da08), 1.31 {I12} (1970Kr01), 1.30 {I16} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.070 {I4} (2019Ma02), 0.0659 {I8} (2015Co07), 0.0637 {I23} (2015Ko06), 0.055 {I3} (1976Bl13), 0.064 {I15} (1972HeYM), 0.073 {I7} (1970Kr01), 0.070 {I14} (1970Da08), 0.070 {I7} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.051 {I8} (2019Ma02), 0.055 {I10} (2015Co07), 0.037 {I12} (1998Sh02) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0033 {I5} (2019Ma02), 0.0033 {I6} (2015Co07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.019 {I8} (2019Ma02), 0.043 {I9} (2015Co07), 0.024 {I10} (1998Sh02) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0012 {I5} (2019Ma02), 0.0026 {I6} (2015Co07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=251.2 {I2} (1998Sh02), 251.78 {I13} (1976Bl13), 251.8 {I3} (1972HeYM), 252.0 (1970Kr01), 251.7 {I6} (1970Da08), 251.9 {I2} (1968Br17) 
$I|g=1.062 {I19} (2015Co07), 1.05 {I7} (2015Ko06), 0.73 {I24} (1998Sh02), 1.24 {I23} (1976Bl13), 1.1 {I4} (1972HeYM), 1.1 {I4} (1970Da08), 0.66 {I17} (1970Kr01), 1.3 {I3} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0640 {I11} (2015Co07), 0.063 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.063 {I9} (1976Bl13), 0.035 {I15} (1972HeYM), 0.037 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.057 {I20} (1970Da08), 0.068 {I15} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=255.7 {I3} (1998Sh02), 255.6 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
$I|g=0.10 {I5} (1998Sh02); 0.08 {I5} (relative), 0.005 {I3} (per 100 decays) (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=221.4 {I1} (1998Sh02), 220.6 {I3} (1972HeYM), 221.4 {I2} (1970Kr01), 221.5 {I3} (1968Br17) 
$I|g=0.47 {I3} (2019Ma02), 0.504 {I16} (2015Co07), 0.46 {I4} (2015Ko06), 0.63 {I10} (1998Sh02), 0.56 {I10} (1972HeYM), 0.54 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.65 {I19} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0304 {I19} (2019Ma02), 0.0304 {I10} (2015Co07), 0.0279 {I24} (2015Ko06), 0.034 {I5} (1972HeYM), 0.030 {I6} (1970Kr01), 0.035 {I10} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=260.4 {I3} (1998Sh02), 260.5 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
$I|g=0.12 {I5} (1998Sh02); 0.10 {I5} (relative), 0.006 {I3} (per 100 decays) (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=598.7 {I1} (1998Sh02), 598.722 {I24} (1976Bl13), 598.8 {I10} (1972HeYM), 598.9 {I5} (1970Kr01), 598.5 {I7} (1970Da08), 598.5 {I5} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=1.34 {I6} (2019Ma02), 1.441 {I19} (2015Co07), 1.43 {I3} (2015Ko06), 1.5 {I3} (1972HeYM), 1.48 {I19} (1968Br17). Others: 1.66 {I8} (1998Sh02), 1.65 {I19} (1976Bl13), 1.8 {I4} (1970Da08), 1.85 {I17} (1970Kr01); all seem high as compared to values near 1.4, although, weighted average of all the values is 1.445 {I23}, with reduced |h{+2}=2.3 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.9 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.086 {I4} (2019Ma02), 0.0867 {I12} (2015Co07), 0.0859 {I18} (2015Ko06), 0.084 {I4} (1976Bl13), 0.090 {I18} (1972HeYM), 0.104 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.093 {I15} (1970Da08), 0.080 {I8} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g from 1998Sh02. Other: 245.2 {I3} (1972HeYM) 
$I|g=0.17 {I5} (1998Sh02); 0.15 {I5} (relative), 0.009 {I3} (per 100 decays) (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=609.1 {I1} (1998Sh02), 609.332 {I36} (1976Bl13), 609.0 {I10} (1972HeYM), 609.2 {I5} (1970Kr01), 609.0 {I10} (1970Da08), 609.1 {I2} (1968Br17) 
$I|g from 2015Ko06. Evaluators assume that 2015Ko06 have applied correction for contributions from {+219}Rn and {+211}Pb decays for a line close to 609 keV. Others: 0.902 {I10} (2015Co07), 1.00 {I6} (1998Sh02), 0.98 {I12} (1976Bl13), 0.68 {I25} (1972HeYM), 1.21 {I22} (1970Da08), 1.31 {I17} (1970Kr01), 0.93 {I13} (1968Br17). None of these authors mentioned contribution from {+219}Rn and {+211}Pb decays NRM weighted average of all the values is 0.905 {I16}, with uncertainty in 2015Ko06 adjusted to 0.16. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0543 {I7} (2015Co07, also from {+219}Rn and {+211}Pb decays), 0.0306 {I15} (2015Ko06), 0.050 {I3} (1976Bl13, also from {+211}Pb decay), 0.041 {I15} (1972HeYM), 0.073 {I10} (1970Kr01), 0.063 {I9} (1970Da08), 0.050 {I5} (1968Br17). Absolute intensity of the 609.4|g from {+219}Rn and {+211}Pb decay can be 0.047% {I7} according to data in the ENSDF database for these decays (as of April 2021), and 0.037% {I9} according to DDEP evaluations: 2011BeZW for {+219}Rn decay and 2013BeZP for {+211}Pb decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.085 {I10} (2015Ko06) and 0.061 {I20} (1998Sh02). I|g/100 decays=0.0051 {I6} (2015Ko06). Other: I|g/100 decays=0.0056 {I12} (2015Co07) for a 619.8|g, assigned to the decay of {+219}Rn, although, this intensity agrees with that in 2015Ko06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=623.5 {I3} (1998Sh02), 623.4 (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.109 {I31} (2019Ma02), 0.135 {I14} (2015Co07), 0.121 {I13} (2015Ko06), 0.15 {I7} (1998Sh02), 0.15 {I8} (1968Br17). 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.007 {I2} (2019Ma02), 0.0082 {I8} (2015Co07), 0.0073 {I8} (2015Ko06), 0.008 {I4} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=131.7 {I2} (1998Sh02), 131.2 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
$I|g=0.10 {I5} (1998Sh02); 0.08 {I5} (relative), 0.005 {I3} (per 100 decays) (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=199.3 {I3} (1998Sh02), 199.4 {I5} (1972HeYM) 
$I|g=0.049 {I24} (1998Sh02), 0.050 {I33} (relative), 0.003 {I2} (per 100 decays) (1972HeYM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=487.4 {I2} (1998Sh02), 488.0 {I8} (1972HeYM), 487.6 {I5} (1970Kr01), 488.0 {I5} (1970Da08), 487.0 {I5} (1968Br17) 
RI$NRM weighted average of I|g=0.100 {I9} (2019Ma02), 0.137 {I5} (2015Co07), 0.100 {I25} (2015Ko06), where uncertainty in 2015Co07 gets adjusted to 0.15. Others: 0.195 {I25} (1998Sh02), 0.18 {I9} (1972HeYM), 0.24 {I7} (1970Kr01), 0.18 {I4} (1968Br17), |?0.29 (1970Da08), all seem high. 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0064 {I6} (2019Ma02), 0.0083 {I3} (2015Co07), 0.0060 {I15} (2015Ko06), 0.011 {I6} (1972HeYM), 0.013 {I6} (1970Kr01), |?0.015 (1970Da08), 0.010 {I2} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=631.7 {I7} (1998Sh02), 632.0 (1970Kr01), 632.0 {I10} (1970Da08) 
RI$from 1998Sh02. Others: 0.57 {I19} (1970Da08), <0.07 (1970Kr01), <0.037 (1972HeYM) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): <0.005 (1972HeYM), <0.01 (1970Kr01), 0.03 {I1} (1970Da08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of I|g=0.047 {I10} (2015Co07), 0.020 {I10} (1998Sh02). I|g/100 decays=0.0028 {I6} (2015Co07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=368.5 {I1} (1998Sh02), 368.8 {I2} (1972HeYM), 369.5 (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.223 {I5} (2015Co07), 0.25 {I4} (2015Ko06). Others: 0.15 {I7} (1998Sh02), 0.13 {I6} (1972HeYM), |?0.37 (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0134 {I4} (2015Co07), 0.0152 {I25} (2015Ko06), 0.008 {I4} (1972HeYM), |?0.02 (1968Br17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=711.3 {I2} (1998Sh02), 711.2 {I7} (1968Br17) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.047 {I6} (2019Ma02), 0.061 {I5} (2015Co07), 0.063 {I17} (1998Sh02), 0.065 {I19} (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0030 {I4} (2019Ma02), 0.0037 {I3} (2015Co07), 0.0035 {I10} (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=390.0 {I2} (1998Sh02), 391.0 {I8} (1972HeYM), 390.0 {I6} (1968Br17). Other: 393.5 {I5} (1970Da08) 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.088 {I11} (2015Co07), 0.12 {I5} (1998Sh02), 0.05 {I4} (1972HeYM). Others: 0.21 {I8} (1970Da08 for a 393.5|g), |?0.13 (1968Br17) 
$Measured I|g(per 100 decays of {+223}Ra): 0.0053 {I7} (2015Co07), 0.003 {I2} (1972HeYM), 0.011 {I4} (1970Da08 for a 393.5|g), |?0.007 (1968Br17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of I|g=0.049 {I21} (2015Co07), 0.020 {I10} (1998Sh02). I|g/100 decays=0.0029 {I13} (2015Co07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.040 {I12} (2015Co07), 0.0049 {I24} (1998Sh02). I|g/100 decays=0.0024 {I7} (2015Co07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1977Ku25, corrected for a change in calibration (new {+198}Au E|g=411.80205 {I17} (1995HeZZ)) 
RI recommended value from 1991BaZS, based on measurements by 1984Ge07, 1983Sc13, 1983Va22, 1982Sa36, 1969Pe17, and calculated value from I(5449|a) and intensity balance at 241.0 level 
M K:L2:L3=100:65:61 (1954Ro10); theory: K:L2:L3=100:62.3:31.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M from I(|g+ce)(293|g)=I|a(5161), with a 10% uncertainty assigned to I|a (compare data for the 645, 633 levels), one gets |a=0.18 {I17}. Theory values are 0.0352 (E1), 0.149 (E2), 0.639 (M1). Note that E1 and E2+M1 are not excluded 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 2021Be13 as weighted mean of 4.032 {I25} by NPL and 3.991 {I23} by NIST; the standard uncertainty estimated as that of the most precise individual determination by NPL and NIST . 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$I|g(867|g)/I|g(681|g)=0.7 {I+6-4}, deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.) ratio, assuming pure E2 for 681. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Di09 and 1977Zo01. Other measured energies: 186.0 {I1} (1969Li10), 185.97 {I5} (1971Lo19), 186.196 {I12} (1974AlZT), 185.8 {I2} (1975Ha31), 186.19 {I10} (1976De48), 186.19 {I16} (1982Ak03). Earlier measurements: 1951Co15, 1960St20, 1964Ew04. 
RI$weighted average of measured absolute intensity (per 100 decays) of 3.555 {I29} by 2018Ma11 (note that authors quote uncertainty of 0.027 in their Table 3); 3.64 {I4} (2001La14); 3.59 {I6} (1991Li11), 3.50 {I5} (1983Ol01); 3.51 {I6} (1983Sc13). Other: 3.29 {I3} (1983Co22) appears discrepant, although this value agrees with 3.28 {I3} from intensity balance at the 186-keV level. 
$Other values: I|g(186|g)/I|g(609|g of {+214}Bi in equilibrium)= 0.07812 {I31} (2002De03), 0.0785 {I5} (2002MoZP), 0.076 {I8} (2000Sa32), 0.0858 {I5} (1993Di09), 0.0823 {I3} (1983Bu14), 0.092 {I10} (1982Ak03), 0.0907 {I14} (1982Fa10), 0.076 {I4} (1981We18), 0.0900 {I11} (1977Zo01), 0.087 {I15} (1975Ha31), 0.0820 {I12} (1970Mo28), 0.079 {I8} (1964Ew04). I|g(609|g of {+214}Bi in equilibrium)=45.45% {I19} is adopted in {+214}Bi |b{+-} decay dataset in the ENSDF database (May 2021 update). Other I|g measurements: 2002MoZP, 1990MoZP, 1976De48, 1974AlZT, 1969Li10, 1969Wa27, 1969Gr33, 1967Ma51. 
M$from ce ratios measured by 1963Go21, 1955Ju14, 1954Ro05. 1973De50 |a(K)=0.200 {I9}, |a(L)=0.380 {I20} were deduced by 1973De50 from I(K| x ray)/I(186|g), I(L| x ray)/I(186|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(262|g)/I|g(186|g)=0.0014 {I2} (1993Di09,1971Lo19). Other measured ratios: 0.0029 (1960St20), 0.0025 (1956Ha71). I(262|g)=0.0049 {I13} from I(4340|a)=0.0059 {I15} and |a(262|g)=0.209; if I(|g+ce) of 187.1|g from the 635 level is negligible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition was not observed; its energy is from the level scheme. 
$I(|g+ce) from intensity balance at the 635.5 level, assuming negligible I(|g+ce) for the 187.1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition was not observed; its energy is from the level scheme. 
$I(|g+ce)(34.8|g)+I(|g+ce)(187.1|g)=0.00008 from the intensity balance at the 635.5-keV level. Intensity balance at the 448.4-keV level, without the assumption of 187.1|g feeding the 448.4 level is -0.0001 {I16}, suggesting negligible intensity of 187.1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(449|g)/I|g(186|g)=5.5|*10{+-5} (1971Lo19). Other measured ratio: 9|*10{+-5} (1960St20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$I|g(867|g)/I|g(681|g)=0.7 {I+6-4}, deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.) ratio, assuming 681 is pure E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From the observed summed (K+L+M)ce peak at 169 keV and GEANT4 simulations of the J|p=(1/2+) isomer decay in {+169}Tm({+40}Ar,4n|g) (2012Ja01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From the observed summed (K+L+M)ce peak at 169 keV and GEANT4 simulations of the J|p=(1/2+) isomer decay (2012Ja01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$From 1981Ri04. Uncertainty estimated by the evaluator from comparison of 391|g in {+202}At: E|g=391 keV in 1981Ri04 and 391.7 {I2} keV in 1992Hu04 (adopted in 2008Zh05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.04 {I4} (2008Ha39). The A{-2} value is inconsistent with the proposed stretched E2 assignment in 2008Ha39, where a possible contamination from a transition of similar energy in {+204}At is suggested 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.04 {I4}, but the value is inconsistent with the proposed stretched E2 assignment in 2008Ha39, where a possible contamination from a transition of similar energy in {+204}At is suggested 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed but placed in the level scheme by the authors by matching the sum energies with that of sequence III 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$DCO, gated on |DJ=2 (569|g) transition gives quadrupole, |D|p, from level-scheme, requires M2 
RI$ uncertainty of 0.02 quoted in 2010Ka29 revised to 1.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$433.5 {I4} from {+176}Yb({+37}Cl,4n|g) (2006Me03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.032 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.003 {I1}, A{-2}=+0.26 {I5} (2009Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$202.1 {I4} from {+176}Yb({+37}Cl,4n|g) (2006Me03) 
M$|a(exp)|<0.14 (2009Dr04), combined analysis for 201.9|g and 247.3|g, with the main contribution being from the latter. A{-2}=-0.12 {I5} (2009Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$247.4 {I4} from {+176}Yb({+37}Cl,4n|g) (2006Me03) 
M$|a(exp)|<0.14 (2009Dr04), combined analysis for 201.9|g and 247.3|g, with the main contribution being from the latter. A{-2}=-0.24 {I4} (2009Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$231.4 {I4} from {+176}Yb({+37}Cl,4n|g) (2006Me03) 
M,MR$from |a(exp)=1.33 {I13} (2009Dr04). Also A{-2}=-0.58 {I4} (2009Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$408.8 {I4} from {+176}Yb({+37}Cl,4n|g) (2006Me03) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.145 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.012 {I4} (2009Dr04). Also |a(exp)=0.25 {I13} and A{-2}=-0.46 {I7} (2009Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$619.5 {I5} from {+176}Yb({+37}Cl,4n|g) (2006Me03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.042 {I8}, K/L=1.6 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.07 {I12} (2009Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)|<0.14, combined analysis for 201.9|g and 247.3|g, with the main contribution being from the latter. A{-2}=-0.12 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)|<0.14, combined analysis for 201.9|g and 247.3|g, with the main contribution being from the latter. A{-2}=-0.24 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
RI$from I(|g+ce)= 51 {I10}, implied from the intensity balance, and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 139.0 keV {i1} (2004Ku24) and 138.6 keV {i2} (2000He17) 
M From |a(K)exp=4.6 {I4} (2004Ku24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Doublet with 224.7|g; |g-ray and level energy were calculated from the sum 62.6|g and 162.5|g in cascade to the g.s. Uncertain placement from uncertain level - not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=2 from DCO and from comparison with 632|g, 847|g transitions of (9+ to 7+) in {+208}Fr, {+212}Fr, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$ce-data indicates M1+E2 or E3; |g(|q) indicates D+Q |a(K)exp=0.32 {I10}; |a(exp)=1.13 {I34} (from delayed intensities) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from ce data; D+Q from |g(|q) 
MR$from |a(K)exp=0.38 {I19}; |a(L)exp=0.063 {I23}; |a(M)exp=0.03 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$obtained after subtraction of I|g of 300.6-keV line from {+207}Po using the 814-keV {+207}Po line for normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.017 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I12} (1977Be56) 
$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.007 {I2} 
M$from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$contaminated by Fe(n,n') line. Intensity from delayed spectrum. 
$A{-2}=-0.005 {I14} 
$|a(K)exp=0.0087 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.0020 {I2} 
M$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp. |g(|q) is not in agreement with pure Q transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.02 {I1}, A{-4}=0.019 {I15} 
$|a(exp)=1.23 {I13} (determined from delayed intensities) 
M$from |a(exp) and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.179 {I8}, A{-4}=0.03 {I1} 
$|a(exp)=0.50 {I6}, |a(K)exp=0.42 {I11} 
M$from |a(exp), |a(K)exp, and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I1} 
$|a(K)exp=0.043 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.025 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.008 {I1} 
M$from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, |a(M)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.06 {I2} 
$|a(exp)=0.86 {I6} (assuming the same delayed total intensity as the 471.9 transition), |a(K)exp=0.5 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.16 {I4} 
M$from |a(exp), |a(K)exp, and |a(L)exp; |g(|q) suggests D 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.047 {I27} 
$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.002 {I1} 
M$from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I3} 
$|a(K)exp=0.74 {I36}, |a(L)exp=0.096 {I30} 
M$|a(K)exp and |a(L)exp indicate M1, however, |g(|q) suggests stretched E2 character. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.39 {I1}, A{-4}=0.014 {I19} 
$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.04 {I1} 
M$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp; |g(|q) indicates D. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.39 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I3} 
$|a(K)exp=0.112 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I5} 
M$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp; |g(|q) suggests D 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=0.07 {I4} 
$|a(K)exp<0.14, |a(L)exp=0.010 {I5} 
M$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp; |g(|q) suggests D 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.29 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I165} 
$|a(exp)=1.5 {I3} (obtained from delayed intensities after subtraction of {+213}Fr component); |a(K)exp=2.5 {I9} (contaminated peak) 
M$from |a(exp) and |a(K)exp; |g(|q) indicates considerable E2 admixture, or a J-to-J transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} 
$|a(exp)=0.92 {I20} (determined from delayed intensities), |a(L)exp=0.30 {I5} 
M$from |a(exp) and |a(L)exp; |g(|q) indicates D 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$corrected for contamination from {+213}Fr. 
$A{-2}=0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} 
$|a(K)exp=0.044 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.027 {I6} 
M$from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.50 {I4}, A{-4}=0.06 {I6} 
$|a(K)exp=0.37 {I10} 
M$|a(K)exp suggests M2 or possibly M1, |g(|q) rule out M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.47 {I6} 
$|a(K)exp=0.022 {I6} 
M$from |a(K)exp, |g(|q) suggests a J to J transition or considerable E2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=1.05 {I45} 
M$1990By02 suggest E3 based on |a(exp) deduced from delayed intensity balance. In this calculation the competing 151|g was assumed to be M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=+0.08 {I1} or +0.17 {I2} and A{-4}=+0.00 {I2} or -0.01 {I2} (1986By01). 
M From |a(L)exp=0.16 {I6}, |a(M)exp=0.048 {I20} (1986By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=+0.73 {I8} or +0.16 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} or +0.00 {I3} (1986By01 - contaminant peaks were comparable > 1/3). 
M From total |a=0.83 {I18}, deduced from delayed intensity measurement (1986By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.11 {I1} or -0.09 {I2} and A{-4}=+0.03 {I1} or +0.01 {I3}. 
M From total |a=0.76 {I18} (1986By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From |a(L)exp=0.12 {I5}, |a(M)exp=0.067 {I23} (1986By01), pol=0.81 {I45} (1979Ho06) 
$ A{-2}=+0.22 {I3} or +0.26 {I6} and A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} or -0.09 {I8} (1986By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=0.28 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.051 {I15}, |a(M)exp=0.018 (5) (1986By01), pol=-0.32 {I8} (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The angular distribution is consistent with a dipole transition; the intensity balance at the 4675-keV level is worse if it is an E1 transition. |a(E1)=0.00812, |a(M1)=0.1038 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(94.4|g)/I|g(909.7|g)=4 {I1}/117 {I2}, measured by 1986By01. I|g(94.4|g) was not listed by 1991ByZZ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} or A{-2}=-0.09 {I10} (1986By01 - contaminant peaks were comparable > 1/3). 
CC for E1, as implied by the intensity balance at the 4675-keV level. |a(M1)=0.517. The angular distribution is consistent with a dipole transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=+0.19 {I2} or +0.23 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} or +0.01 {I7} (1986By01 - contaminant peaks were comparable > 1/3). 
M From |a(K)exp=0.06 {I4} (1986By01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.041 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0097 {I10} (1986By01), pol=-0.52 {I36} (1979Ho06). |d=0.00 {I19} using the |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.78 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4} or A{-2}=-0.81 {I11} (1986By01). 
M the measured large A{-2} value indicated some quadrupole admixture. Authors' earlier assignment of E1 (1986By01) from conversion electron measurement has been withdrawn (1991ByZZ). Since the ce(K 317|g) line was contaminated by the ce(M 222|g), the angular distribution measurements were more reliable for determination of its multipolarity. E1+M2 with any significant amount of M2 admixture is ruled out because of short half-life of the 6102-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.20 {I7} and M1/E2 in 1986By01 but different placement in 1986By01 compared to that in 1989By01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=+0.04 {I10} or +0.22 {I7} and A{-4}=-0.16 {I14} or -0.20 {I10} (1986By01 - contaminant peaks were comparable > 1/3). 
M From total |a<40, from intensity balance in 1986By01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)(M1)=828.1. Other multipolarities were ruled out by 1989By01 by considering the transition strength limits deduced from the measured T{-1/2}=6.2 ns which was assigned also to the 6724-keV level. 
0.21 {I4}<I|g<0.51 {I6} from intensity balance at the 6724-keV and 6715-keV levels, assuming that the 9.2-keV transition is M1 and the 621.8|g is an E3 transition. An assumption of E1 multipolarity and the intensity balance would yield 10<I|g<24 and 0.002<B(E1)(W.u.)<0.005. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M The angular distribution is consistent with dipole character for this transition. |a(E1)=0.00532, |a(M1)=0.0580. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.007 {I272} or -0.23 {I20} (1986By01 - contaminant peaks were comparable > 1/3) 
The angular distribution suggests a dipole character for the 182.5|g. |a(E1)=0.1106, |a(M1)=2.616. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M No ce line was listed for this transition. It is assumed that ce lines were weak, suggesting E1 or E2 multipolarity. The angular distribution coefficient listed is in agreement with a dipole character. |a(E1)=0.0243. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=+0.17 {I13} or +0.35 {I15} (1986By01 - contaminant peaks were comparable > 1/3) 
M From |a(exp)=6.2 {I3}, determined from the delayed intensity data (1989By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)=0.35 {I7}, deduced by 1989By01 (method was not discussed), and E3 multipolarity was assigned. Although |a(exp) is also consistent with an M1 transition [|a(M1)=0.3638], if its placement is correct, T{-1/2}(8094 level) suggests E3 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level scheme. Existence of this |g was inferred in (HI,xn|g) from |g|g-coincidence data (1994By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.47 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.110 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.035 {I3}; A{-2}=+0.36 {I3} (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.41 {I8}; |a(L)exp=0.10 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.023 {I4} (1993De26) 
E$other: 471.8 {I2} (1993De26). 
RI$other: 63 {I3} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.036 {I7}; |a(L)exp=0.011 {I1}; A{-2}=-0.12 {I5} for both 516|gs (1994By01). 
RI$given in 1994By01 as one of the |g doublets. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 299.2 {I2} (1993De26). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.50 {I10}; |a(L)exp(299.2|g+299.3|g)=0.12 {I1}; A{-2}=0.00 {I7} (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.45 {I18}; |a(L)exp=0.16 {I6}; |a(M)exp=0.048 {I20} (1993De26) 
RI$other: 13 {I2} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 442.8 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.17 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.05 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.03 {I6} (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.22 {I4}; |a(L)exp=0.042 {I9}; |a(M)exp=0.0054 {I20} (1993De26). 
RI$other: 5.2 {I6} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 607.0 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.097 {I10}; |a(L)exp(607.5|g+608.9|g)=0.016 {I3} (1994By01). 
RI$other: 2.6 {I5} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 906.5 {I2} (1993De26). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.017 {I1}; A{-2}=-0.19 {I3} (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.039 {I8}; |a(L)exp=0.0065 {I12} (1993De26) 
RI$other: 3.0 {I3} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 53.2 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(tot)exp=9 {I4} (1994By01). 
RI$other: 0.7 {I2} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.036 {I7}; |a(L)exp=0.011 {I1}; A{-2}=-0.12 {I5} for both 516|gs (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.018 {I5}; |a(L)exp=0.004 {I2} (1993De26). 
RI$given in 1994By01 as one of the |g doublets; other: 19 {I3} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$other: 580.5 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.21 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.053 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.025 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.60 {I23} (1994By01). |a(K)exp=0.23 {I4}; |a(L)exp=0.073 {I15}; |a(M)exp=0.037 {I8} (1993De26) 
RI$other: 7.4 {I7} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$other: 1023.0 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0120 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0048 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.0010 {I2}; A{-2}=+0.52 {I2} (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.015 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.0042 {I8}; |a(M)exp=0.0008 {I3} (1993De26). 
RI$other: 84 {I4} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$other: 118.7 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(tot)exp=9 {I1}; A{-2}=-0.06 {15} (1994By01). 
$Proposed sequence of 312.5|g and 118.5|g by 1994By01, reversed from 118.5|g and 312.5|g proposed by 1993De26 on the basis of shell-model calculations (Priv. Comm. from A. Byrne with Y. A. Akovali (1995El07)). 
RI$other: 6.0 {I4} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 312.7 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.026 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.011 {I7}; A{-2}=-0.17 {I2} (1994By01); |a(K)exp=0.032 {I13} (1993De26). 
RI$other: 100 {I5} (1993De26). 
$The total transition intensity of the 312.5|g is greater than that of 118.5|g which is placed cascading below the 312.5|g. If the placements of these |g's are correct, the intensity balance at the 1851-keV level suggests that the measured I|g(312.5|g) possibly includes some impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 738.3 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.006 {I1} (1994By01). 
RI$other: 11 {I2} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 892.0 {I2} (1993De26). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I15}, |a(L)exp=0.0014 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.47 {I5} (1994By01). |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I10} (1993De26) 
RI$other: 47 {I9} (1993De26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp(400|g+402|g)=0.26 {I5}; |a(L)exp(400|g+402|g)=0.10 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.35 {I20} (1994By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I26} (1994By01). 
$Another possible placement from energy fit only could be between the 3340+x and 3089+x levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E$from level scheme. Existence of this |g was inferred from |g|g-coincidence data (1994By01). 
$Intensity balance at the 3566+x level, when side feeding is neglected, yields I|g=0.061 {I25} (1994By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp(607.5+608.9)=0.097 {I10}; |a(L)exp(607.5+608.9)=0.016 {I3}; A{-2}=-0.29 {I8} (1994By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp(400.0|g+402.7|g)=0.26 {I5}, |a(L)exp(400.0|g+402.7|g)=0.10 {I2}; A{-2}=+0.50 {I17} (1994By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(tot)exp=0.75 {I25}; |a(K)exp=0.26 {I15} (with some contamination from {+215}Fr); |a(L)exp=0.12 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.58 {I11} (1994By01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$ from 1984Sc25. Others: 24 {I4} (1984De16), 45.4 {I17} (1985Dr04); the latter in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=670.2 (1982GoZU). EG=670, IG=65 13 (1984De16). EG=670.2 2, IG=98 4 (1984Sc25). EG=670.44 15, IG=100 4 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7}, POL=+0.42 {I5} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I5}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.60 {I6} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=700, IG=32 6 (1984De16). EG=699.9 2, IG=44 2 (1984Sc25). EG=699.98 15, IG=47 2 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.34 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I6}, POL=+0.39 {I6} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=-0.16 {I8}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.65 {I6} (1984De16) 
$K/L ratio overlaps E2 and E3 (1984De16) 
MR$from |g(|q); weighted average of -3.75 {I+55-40} (1985Dr04) and -7 {I+3-13} (1984De16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$ EG=136 (1984De16). EG=135.4 2, IG=7.1 3 (1984Sc25). EG=135.41 15, IG=8.1 3 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.09 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7} (1985Dr04). Non-observation in ce spectrum of 1984De16 suggests E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1985Dr04); |DJ=0 transition 
RI$ from I|g(165)/I|g(135)=0.568 {I32} (1985Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=450.5 (1982GoZU), EG=451, IG=38 4 (1984De16). EG=451.2 2, IG=57 2 (1984Sc25). EG=451.24 15, IG=60 2 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7}, POL=+0.50 {I14} (1985Dr04). POL for 451+449 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I5}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.45 {I5} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=313, IG=6 1 (1984De16). EG=313.6 2, IG=7.0 3 (1984Sc25). EG=313.30 15, IG=15.9 6 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6}, POL=+0.30 {I18} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} (1984Sc25). Non-observation in ce spectrum of 1984De16 suggests E1 
$ A2<0 (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=449, IG=25 3 (1984De16). EG=449.0 2, IG=42 1 (1984Sc25). EG=449.17 15, IG=35 1 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7}, POL=+0.50 {I14} (1985Dr04). POL for 451+449 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I10}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.46 {I5} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=478, IG=25 3 (1984De16). EG=478.7 2, IG=32 2 (1984Sc25). EG=478.85 15, IG=27 1 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I4}, POL=+0.42 {I9} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I7} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=-0.21 {I5}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.36 {I6} (1984De16) 
MR$from |g(|q); weighted average of -3.75 {I+50-40} (1985Dr04) and -6 {I+3-4} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=290.2 (1982GoZU). EG=291, IG=61 6 (1984De16). EG=290.9 2, IG=97 3 (1984Sc25). EG=290.94 15, IG=68 3 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6}, POL=+0.55 {I9} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.35 {I6} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=318 (1984De16). EG=318.5 2, IG=19 1 (1984Sc25). EG=318.53 15, IG=17.1 6 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I6}, POL=+0.49 {I21} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I7} (1984Sc25) 
$K/L ratio overlaps E2 and E3 (1984De16) 
MR$from |g(|q) (1985Dr04). Dominant E2 with <10% M1 admixture from ce data in 1984De16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=335, IG=12 2 (1984De16). EG=335.8 2, IG=19 1 (1984Sc25). EG=335.92 15, IG=18.2 7 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.23 {I8} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=133 (1984De16). EG=133.0 2, IG=32 3 (1984Sc25). EG=133.08 15, IG=40 2 for doublet (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} for doublet (1984Sc25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$ from 1984De16, based on K and L lines 
CC$ for M1 
$ EG=107 (1984De16). EG=107.4 3, IG=8 1 (1984Sc25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=133 (1984De16). EG=133.0 2, IG=11 3 (1984Sc25). EG=133.08 15, IG=40 2 for doublet (1985Dr04) 
MR$from |g(|q) (1984De16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=241, IG=23 2 (1984De16). EG=240.5 2, IG=27 1 (1984Sc25). EG=240.54 15, IG=18.7 7 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I7} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I5}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.30 {I5} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=201.6 (1982GoZU). EG=202, IG=100 10 (1984De16). EG=202.3 2, IG=101 3 (1984Sc25). EG=202.33 15, IG=54 2 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6}, POL=+0.53 {I17} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.23 {I4} (1984De16) 
$K/L ratio overlaps E1 or M1 (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=235, IG=79 8 (1984De16). EG=235.4 2, IG=79 3 (1984Sc25). EG=235.39 15, IG=44 2 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.22 {I4} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=555, IG=65 7 (1984De16). EG=555.4 2, IG=42 2 (1984Sc25). EG=555.52 15, IG=18.4 7 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6}, POL=+0.58 {I16} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I6}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.13 {I5} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ EG=649.0 2, IG=6 1 (1984Sc25). EG=649.14 15, IG=7.9 7 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I6} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=-0.36 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I14} (1984Sc25) 
M,MR$ from |g(|q) data. |d(E2/M1)=-1.27 {+18-12} (1985Dr04), but (E1) in 1984Sc25. Negative A{-4} is inconsistent with pure E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=262, IG=63 6 (1984De16). EG=262.0 2, IG=38 1 (1984Sc25). EG=262.01 15, IG=12.8 6 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I7}, POL=+0.46 {I37} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1984Sc25) 
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I5}, I|g(prompt)/I|g(delayed)=0.15 {I4} (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
$ EG=817 (1984De16). EG=817.5 2, IG=13 1 (1984Sc25). EG=817.55 15, IG=4.4 2 (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.50 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I7} (1985Dr04) 
$A{-2}=+0.57 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I7} (1984Sc25) 
$K/L ratio agrees better with E3 but also not far from E2 (1984De16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.14 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1985Dr04) 
E$from 1985Dr04. This |g ray was observed by 1984Sc25 in |a|g coin, but not placed in the level scheme. 
RI$ 7.6 {I3} (1985Dr04) relative to 100 for 670|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition assigned as deexciting the Ex=247.8 state in the level scheme; not assigned in the gamma ray transitions table. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M from intensity balance |g is not E2 
M M1 gives I(|g+ce)|?106, E2 gives I(|g+ce)|?2000, E1 gives I(|g+ce)|?3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g|g coin analysis in {+210}Pb({+11}B,4n|g) (1988Ai02) reveals that 363.6|g is multiplet and, therefore, the ordering of 340.6|g and 363.6|g is not unambiguous. 
M$DCO=1.32 {I11}; A{-2}=0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.63 {I6}, A{-2}=-0.24 {I3}. Total intensity for 278.0|g suggests E1 rather than M1 assignment, when considering the intensity balance at the 1077-keV level by gating on the preceding 154.4|g and 358.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from B(E1)/B(E2)=1.1|*10{+-6} {I4} (1988Ai02) 
M$DCO=1.31 {I31}, but it may be associated with 432.6|g, depopulating the 1688.9-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$from B(E1)/B(E2)=0.9|*10{+-6} {I2} (1988Ai02) 
M$DCO=0.75 {I8}, A{-2}=-0.19 {I6}. Doublet consisting of 202.3|g and 204.0|g transition, the former is E1 in {+215}Fr (1984Sc25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from B(E1)/B(E2)=0.9|*10{+-6} {I2} (1988Ai02) 
M$DCO=1.28 {I23}, A{-2}=0.34 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g|g coin analysis reveals that 363.6|g is multiplet and, therefore, the ordering of 340.6|g and 363.6|g is not unambiguous, as pointed out in 1988Ai02. 
M$DCO=1.32 {I11}; A{-2}=0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from B(E1)/B(E2)=1.1|*10{+-6} {I4} (1988Ai02) 
M$DCO=1.31 {I31}, buit it be associated with 432.6|g, depopulating the 1688.9-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$from I|a=44.6% {I40} and |g-ray transition intensity balance of 14.5 {I25} at 15.0 level. 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a(theory) for mult=E2 for 15.0-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$L1+L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a 
M,MR$from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 56 level. 1991Li19 list M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from (L1+L2)/L3 ratio. L1+L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a 
$E|g=84 {I1}, %I|g=0.17 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW); E|g=82, %I|g=0.23, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from (L1+L2)/L3 ratio. 1991Li19 list M1 L1+L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a 
$E|g=99 {I1}, %I|g=0.20 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW); E|g=96, %I|g=0.2, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$1991Li19 list M1 
$E|g=120 {I2}, %I|g|?0.03, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW); E|g=123, %I|g<0.05, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$1991Li19 list E1 from intensity balance 
$E|g=93 {I1}, %I|g=0.17 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$1991Li19 list E1(+M2), with <5% M2 admixture from intensity balance 
E|g=176 {I2}, %I|g|?0.05, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW). E|g|?170, %I|g<0.8, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$1991Li19 list E1(+M2), with <5% M2 admixture from intensity balance 
$E|g=192 {I1}, %I|g=0.25 {I15}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$1991Li19 list E1, possibly from decay scheme 
$E|g=216 {I1}, %I|g=0.15 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
M$(M1) in 1991Li19 from decay scheme and |g-transition intensity balance 
$E|g=207 {I2}, %I|g|?0.06, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
TI$intensity listed in Table I of 1991Li19 is assumed by evaluators as transition intensity. If it were just the photon intensity, then it produces a large non-physical negative intensity balance at 269-keV level, as well as gives too large an I|a to the 333 level from |g-transition intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Tentative placement proposed by evaluators based on level-energy difference. This |g was unplaced in 1991Li19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=73 {I1}, %I|g=0.20 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW). I(|g+ce)=0.01 from intensity balance at 778 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
ce(M) and ce(N) lines seen in ce spectrum. |g ray marked M1 in level scheme (1992Li31) 
TI$From |g-ray transition-intensity balance at the 73.0 level. 
From I(|g+ce)=181 {I11} and |a[M1]=172.6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$Deduced from transition-intensity balance at the 156.8-keV level; I|g from I(|g+ce)=73 {I15} and |a[M1]=159. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI other: I|g/10|*10{+3} |a's=53 (1969Le07) 
M |a(L)exp<0.057 (1973ChZH); theory: |a(L)(E1)=0.0252, |a(L)(E2)=0.841, |a(L)(M1)=0.619 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<2.9, |a(L)exp<0.15 (1973ChZH); theory: E1: |a(K)=0.0759, |a(L)=0.0145; E2: |a(K)=0.175, |a(L)=0.329; M1: |a(K)=1.84, |a(L)=0.336 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<0.62, |a(L)exp<0.03 (1973ChZH); theory: E1: |a(K)=0.0650, |a(L)=0.0123; E2: |a(K)=0.154, |a(L)=0.249; M1: |a(K)=1.54, |a(L)=0.280 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.4, K/L=10 (1973ChZH); theory: E1: |a(K)=0.0537, K/L=5.34; E2: |a(K)=0.129, K/L=0.73; M1: |a(K)=1.22, K/L=5.48 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.06 {I25} from (K| x ray)(|a)/|a|g (1966BrZX), K/L=4.9 (1973ChZH); theory: E1: |a(K)=0.0380, K/L=5.45; E2: |a(K)=0.095, K/L=0.98; M1: |a(K)=0.808, K/L=5.48 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.85, |a(L)exp<0.24 (1973ChZH): theory: E2: |a(K)=0.103, |a(L)=0.113; M1: |a(K)=0.90, |a(L)=0.164 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<1.65, |a(L)exp=0.09 (1973ChZH); theory: E2: |a(K)=0.0706, |a(L)=0.0565; M1: |a(K)=0.553, |a(L)=0.100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2, |a(L)exp<0.4 (1973ChZH); theory: E2: |a(K)=0.167, |a(L)=0.295; M1: |a(K)=1.72, |a(L)=0.313 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Adopted from |D' (J|p). Measured M1+E2, |d=0.69 {I27}, |a=6.0 {I14} 
This |g was interpreted by 1988Sh12 to be doublet with about 85% E2 and 15% M2 transitions decaying to the 99.62 and 99.85 keV levels, respectively. The assumed M2 part would be highly enhanced, having a B(M2)(W.u.) value of about 3200 which rules out this assumption. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)|<9.3 (and I|g|<0.0015) if there is no |b{+-} branch to the 26.02 keV level; I(|g+ce)=8.1 {I12} (and I|g=0.0013 {I2}) if I(|g+ce)(10.7|g)=5.2 {I12} (that is, if there is also no |b{+-} to 36.68-keV level). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)(10.7|g)|>4.0 from I(|g+ce)(10.7|g)/I(|g+ce)(36.7|g)= 8.5 {I15}/17.9 {I23}, as deduced in {+225}Ac |a decay, and I(|g+ce)(36.7|g)|>8.4. If there is no |b branch to the 36.68 keV level, the intensity balance yields I(|g+ce)(10.7|g)+I(|g+ce)(36.7|g)=16.3 {I14}; therefore, I(|g+ce)(10.7|g)=5.2 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$M1 admixture <10% (2003Ku44) 
RI |>0.0075 from Ice(M2 36.7|g)+Ice(M3 36.7|g)|>1.6 (measured) and the theoretical conversion coefficient of (|a(M2)+|a(M3))(E2)=214. If there is no |b branch to the 36.68-keV level, the intensity balance yields I(|g+ce)(36.7|g)=11.1 {I19}; therefore, I|g(36.7|g)=0.0099 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from measured Ice(M2 38.53|g)+Ice(M3 38.5|g)|>1.6 and the theoretical conversion coefficients. The intensity balance to the g.s. yields I|g<0.05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I(99.63|g)/I(62.95|g)=0.70 {I6}/0.14 {I2}, as deduced in {+225}Ac |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I|g(195.69|g)/I|g(157.26|g)=0.15 {I1}/0.33 {I2}, as measured in {+225}Ac |a decay, and I|g(157.26|g)=0.22 {I4}. I|g(195.69|g)|?0.15 was measured by 1977Vy02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I(253.53|g)/I(153.87|g)=0.113 {I5}/0.172 {I8} and I(253.53|g)/I(145.17|g)=0.113 {I5}/0.134 {I6}, as measured in {+225}Ac |a decay. I(253.53|g)+I(254.2|g of {+217}Po)=2.7 {I2} was measured, and I(253.53|g)|?0.6 was estimated by 1977Vy02 by decomposing the peak into components. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$2003Ku44, 2002Ya04 confirm this transition which was proposed by 1972Go29 and 1972Dz14 to account for intensity imbalances at the 26- and 37-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2:N3=0.2 {I1}:6.1 {I7}:6.2 {I8}:1.7 {I2}:1.7 {I2}:0.5 {I1}:0.5 {I1} 
$M1 admixture is <20% (2003Ku44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2:N3=0.11 {I7}:3.1 {I3}: 3.1 {I4}:0.8 {I1}:0.8 {I1}:0.25 {I5}:0.25 {I5} 
M$M1 admixture <10% (2003Ku44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$M1 admixture is >30% I|g; 2003Ku44 calculated I|g using ce data from 1972Dz14. 
ce(L3)=0.21 {I5}; L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=<0.05:0.25 {I3}:0.21 {I5}: 0.08 {I3}:0.06 {I2}. These conversion data suggest that possible M1 admixture is less than 40%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$E2 admixture is (3+-1)% 
RI$2003Ku44 calculated I|g using ce data from 1972Dz14. 
ce(L1)=1.30 {I15}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M3=1.30 {I15}:0.20 {I3}:0.070 {I15}: 0.39 {I5}:0.07 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
I|g=0.068 {I6} was measured. Intensity of the part deexciting the 393.28-keV level was deduced by the evaluator from I|g(119|g)/I|g(169|g)=0.28 {I4}/0.26 {I3}, as measured in {+221}Rn |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|g ray not observed. I|g deduced by evaluator to reproduce a |<24% |b{+-} feeding (reported by 1992Ku03) using |a=51100 for an (E2) adopted multipolarity. I|g|<20 (1992Ku03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
TI$from the |g-ray spectrum of 1992Ku03 evaluator concluded that the I|g value listed by 1992Ku03 actually corresponds to I(|g+ce). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ce(L1)+ce(L2)/ce(L3) (1995Sh03). Other value: |d=0.33, from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=11:6:7 (1959No41), consistent with M1+10% E2, or E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$M1 from {+223}Rn |b{+-} decay. |g ray possibly deexcites the 244.6 (7/2-) level. See adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR values measured in |b{+-} decay are 0.32 {I2} and 0.44 {I2}, but intensity balance at the 28 level in |b{+-} decay implies |d|>0.6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(M)exp=89 {I6}, |a(N)exp=35.7 {I26}. 
MR 0.32 {I2} from |a(M)exp; 0.44 {I2} from |a(N)exp, assuming no contribution from higher shells and |a(N)(M1)=5.31, |a(N)(E2)=195 from 2002Ba85. However, intensity balance at the 29 keV level implies a lower limit for |a(exp) of 1.1|*10{+3} {I2} and this corresponds to |d|?0.6, so the evaluators adopt |d=0.45 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=13.4 {I10}, |a(L3)exp=3.5 {I3}, |a(M)exp=4.3 {I3}, |a(N)exp<1.8. 
MR from |d=0.17 {I3} from |a(L)exp=16.9 {I10} and 0.19 {I3} from |a(M)exp. Note that |d<0.13 from |a(L12)exp and |d=0.250 {I12} from |a(L3)exp. 1997Bu03, however, adopted |d=0.31 {I4} from these data 
%I|g=1.16 {I7} assuming adopted normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=8 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=6.1 {I23}, |a(M)exp=5.4 {I20}. 
%I|g=0.44 {I10} assuming adopted normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<1.1, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=|<0.05, |a(L3)exp|<0.01, |a(M)exp|<0.10. 
%I|g=5.5 {I11} assuming adopted normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)|<40.5, |a(M)exp|<2.1 for doubly-placed |g dominated by this transition; not M1 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<0.37, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)|<0.11 consistent with E1 or E2. |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.4 {i9}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)|<0.37 suggest an M1 transition. It is inconsistent with the placement from this level unless, perhaps, the 202|g feeds the (3/2+) level at E=205 {i3} seen in (t,|a); this would not, however, explain observed |g|g coin data or absence of strong enough transition(s) to deexcite that (3/2+) level. 1997Bu03 suggest that the 409 keV level may be a doublet with levels of either parity. Therefore, at present E1 seems to be a better choice. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.52 if entire I(ce) for doublet is assigned to this placement. |a(K)exp=0.18 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.27 if entire I(ce) for doublet is assigned to this placement. |a(K)exp=0.18 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.046 {I7}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.008 {I1}. 
%I|g=2.62 {I17} assuming adopted normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.19, |a(L12)exp=0.04 if entire I(ce) for doublet is assigned to this placement. |a(K)exp=0.14 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.47 if entire I(ce) for doublet is assigned to this placement. |a(K)exp=0.14 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$the intensity imbalance at the 2017 level [I(|g+ce)(in)=65, I(|g+ce)(out)=40], suggests that the (6+) to (6+) 261.5|g may have an E0 component. One gets |a(261|g)=2.3 {I7} compared with |a(E2)=0.237 and |a(M1)=1.09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$2005Re02 report E|g=262.0 {I5}, I|g=12 {I2} 
TI$from an intensity balance at the 2017 level 
M$as pointed out by R. Julin, I(|g+ce) and I|g for the 261.5|g leads to |a=2.3 {I7} compared with |a=0.237 and 1.09 for mult=E2 and M1, respectively, suggesting that the 261.5|g may have an E0 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 643.6 keV {I5} from {+184}W({+30}Si,5n|g) and 644.4 keV {I5} from {+174}Yb({+40}Ar,5n|g). 
M${+209}Ra cg M; |a(K)exp<0.034 and K/L>3 in {+174}Yb({+40}Ar,5n|g) (2008Ha12) are consistent with E1 or E2, but E1 is ruled out, since the placement in the level scheme requires Mult.=E2; |g-ray anisotropy measurements in {+184}W({+30}Si,5n|g) (2004Re04) suggest also Mult.=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+174}Yb({+40}Ar,5n|g) 2008Ha12 
M$from |a(K)exp=4.0 {I5} in {+174}Yb({+40}Ar,5n|g) (2008Ha12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.034 and K/L>3 (2008Ha12) are consistent with E1 or E2, but E1 is ruled out, since the placement in level scheme requires E2 Mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 603.5 {I6} (2004Re04) and 603.4 {I5} (2005Re02) from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 604.5 {I6} (2004He25) from ({+12}C,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 601.2 {I5} (2004Re04) and 600.5 {I6} (2005Re02) from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 602.1 {I6} (2004He25) from ({+12}C,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 773.7 {I5} (2004Re04) and 773.9 {I5} (2005Re02) from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 774.6 {I4} (2004He25) from ({+12}C,6n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 577.1 {I5} (2004Re04) and 577.1 {I5} (2005Re02) from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 578.0 {I4} (2004He25) from ({+12}C,6n|g). 
E,RI$Other: 577.1 {I5}, I|g=100 {I12} (scaled to 100 (577|g) by evaluator) (2005Re02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 749.7 {I5} (2004Re04) and 749.4 {I5} (2005Re02) from ({+30}Si,4n|g) and 750.5 {I4} (2004He25) from ({+12}C,6n|g). 
RI$Other: 52.9 {I19} ({+12}C,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 603.5 {I6} (2004Re04) and 603.4 {I5} (2005Re02). 
RI$Others: 182 {I1} (scaled to 100 (577|g) by evaluator) (2005Re02), 105 {I6} (prompt) relative to 100 (518.2|g) (2004Re04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 601.2 {I5} (2004Re04) and 600.5 {I6} (2005Re02). 
RI$Others: 55 {I7} (scaled to 100 (577|g) by evaluator) (2005Re02), 32 {I6} (prompt) relative to 100 (518.2|g) (2004Re04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 773.7 {I5} (2004Re04) and 773.9 {I5} (2005Re02). 
RI$Others: 99 {I12} (scaled to 100 (577|g) by evaluator) (2005Re02), 39 {I2} (prompt) relative to 100 (518.2|g) (2004Re04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 749.7 {I5} (2004Re04) and 749.4 {I5} (2005Re02). 
RI$Other:63 {I8} (scaled to 100 (577|g) by evaluator) (2005Re02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: E|g=95 {I1}, I|g=7 {I4} (scaled to 100 (577|g) by evaluator) (2005Re02) 
M$Assigned in 2004Re04 from intensity balance at 1954 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=1.0 {I5} 
$Observed by 2005Ku31 only. 
M$from comparison of |a(exp) with |a(M1,theory)=0.742 and |a(E3,theory)=1.1, M1 and E3 are possible; Weisskopf half-life estimates for M1 T{-1/2}=8.57|*10{I+-7} |ms {I7} and E3 T{-1/2}=2.36 ms {I4} rule out E3 since |g ray is observed to be prompt according to 2005Ku31. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From comparison of |a(exp) and |a{-k}/|a with |a(M2,theory)=1.014 and |a(E4,theory)=1.387 M2 and E4 are possible; Weisskopf estimates for M2 T{-1/2}=0.09 |ms {I15} and E4 T{-1/2}=172 s {I5} compared with measured T{-1/2}=4.0 |ms {I5} rule out E4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|g observed only by 2005Ku31. 
M$from comparison of |a(exp) with |a(M1,theory)=0.742 and |a{+E3}(theo)=1.1, M1 and E3 are possible; Weisskopf half-life estimates for M1 T{-1/2}=8.57|*10{+-7} |ms {I7} and E3 T{-1/2}=2.36 ms {I4} rule out E3 since |g ray is observed to be prompt according to 2005Ku31. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
$From missing I|g 2004He25 obtain |a(exp)=1.07 {I4}. From line intensity of x-rays they determine experimental K/(L+M) conversion ratio |a{-k}/|a=0.44 {I3}. 
M$From comparison of |a(exp) and |a{-k}/|a with |a(M2,theory)=1.014 and |a(E4,theory)=1.387 M2 and E4 possible; Weisskopf estimates for M2 T{-1/2}=0.09 |ms {I15} and E4 T{-1/2}=172 s {I5} compared with measured T{-1/2}=4.0 |ms {I5} rule out E4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$1986Ko01 observed ce(L) and ce(M), energy uncertainty not given, |+2 keV assumed by the evaluator for further fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by the evaluator from the intensity balance of the 2577 keV level assuming no direct feeding and that I(|g+ce)(123)=I(|g+ce)(932), i.e. I(|g+ce)(36) = I(|g+ce)(618)-I(|g+ce)(1025)-I(|g+ce)(932). Similar, but less precise value of I(|g)(36)=56 {I14} was obtained from the intensity balance of the 2613 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2005Ku31. Other: 628.3 keV {I5} (2000He17). 
RI$deduced by the evaluator based on reported |a feeding and internal-conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$observed ce(L) and ce(M) in 1986Ko01 experiment, energy uncertainty not given, |+2 keV assumed by the evaluator for further fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by the evaluator from the intensity balance of the 2577 keV level assuming no direct population and that I(|g+ce)(123)=I(|g+ce)(932), i.e. I(|g+ce)(36) = I(|g+ce)(618)-I(|g+ce)(1025)-I(|g+ce)(932). Similar, but less precise value of I|g(36)=15.3 {I38} was obtained from the intensity balance of the 2613 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from 1986Ko01 using observed ce(L) and ce(M) in {+204}Pb({+12}C,4n|g). In 2005Ku31 the transition was not observed, but the level energy differences suggest a value of |?72 keV. 
RI$the uncertainty includes the uncertainty on |a feeding intensity as well as the uncertainty on the conversion coefficient. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 545.4 {I5} (2004He25), 546.2 {I1} (2006Ku26) 
$I|g(rel)=100.4 {I12}: Weighted average of 104 {I3} (1976Ra37) and 100 {I1} (2006Ku26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1061.2 {I5} (2004He25), 1062.1 {I1} (2006Ku26) 
$I|g(rel)=99.4 {I27}: Weighted average of 100 {I3} (1976Ra37) and 97 {I6} (2006Ku26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 160.4 {I5} (2004He25), 161.2 {I1} (2006Ku26). In 1976Ra37, a transition |?161|g was shown in Fig. 7 to feed the level at 1608.85 (9/2-), but argued it would not depopulate the isomeric state (J{+|p}=(17/2-)) as an E2 transition. 
$I|g(rel)=43.5 {I25}: Weighted average of 46 {I2} (1976Ra37) and 41 {I2} (2006Ku26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from IT decay (2006Ku26); others: 1381.2 {I10} (1971MaXI, 1971MaXH), 1381.9 {I5} (2004He25) and 1382.4 (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from IT decay (2006Ku26); others: 255.9 {I5} (1971MaXH, 1971MaXI), 256.6 {I2} (1972Co18), 256.8 {I4} (2004He25) and 256.9 (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from IT decay (2006Ku26); others: 179.4 {I5} (1971MaXH, 1971MaXI), 180.4 {I2} (1972Co18), 180.7 {I4} (2004He25) and 180.4 (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I1}; |a(L)exp=0.00067 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.00014 {I3} (1992St09). 
E$others: 1381.2 {I10} (1971MaXI, 1971MaXH) and 1381.9 {I5} (2004He25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.098 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.115 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.034 {I2} (1992St09). 
E$others: 255.9 {I5} (1971MaXH, 1971MaXI), 256.6 {I2} (1972Co18) and 256.8 {I4} (2004He25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp=0.447 {I10}; |a(M)exp=0.152 {I6} (1992St09). 
E$others: 179.4 {I5} (1971MaXH, 1971MaXI), 180.4 {I2} (1972Co18) and 180.7 {I4} (2004He25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=1.1 {I5}; |a(L)exp=0.30 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.12 {I3} resulted in |d=0.0 {I7} (1992St09). 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.33 {I10}; A{-4}=-0.06 {I11} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 207.9 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.042 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.028 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.0067 {I6}; A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}; A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.39 {I5}; A{-4}=+0.02 {I6}; polarization P(|q)=0.39 {I21} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 608.8 (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0226 {I5}; |a(L)exp=0.0075 {I4}; |a(M)exp=0.0018 {I2}; A{-2}=+0.30 {I3} (1992St09) |a(M)exp=0.018 {I2} in 1992St09 appears to be a typo; A{-2}=+0.42 {I6}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I7}; polarization P(|q)=0.63 {I24} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 817.4 (1979Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0079 {I12}; |a(L)exp=0.0011 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.0004 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.21 {I5}; A{-4}=-0.14 {I8} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.32 {I5}; A{-4}=-0.11 {I7}; polarization P(|q)=0.6 {I3} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 1078.4 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.1 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.037 {I2}; |a(M)exp=0.016 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.20 {I2} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.33 {I7}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I9} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 311.3 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I7}; A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}; A{-4}=0 (1992St09); A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I5}; polarization P(|q)=0.13 {I16} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 573.0 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp<0.016; A{-2}=-0.24 {I3}; A{-4}=0 (1992St09); A{-2}=-0.15 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I5}, polarization P(|q)=0.04 {I24} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 645.8 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp=1.2 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.32 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.15 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.29 {I14}; A{-4}=-0.34 {I17} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 149.0 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.20 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.06 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.27 {I4}; A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1979Ho06). 
E$other: 221.0 (1979Ho06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I10}; |a(L)exp=0.0017 {I6}; A{-2}=+0.23 {I10}; A{-4}=-0.18 {16} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.33 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.070 {I6}; |a(M)exp=0.016 {I4} (1992St09). 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I10} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.034 {I1}; |a(L)exp=0.019 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.006 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.88 {I15}; |a(L)exp=0.155 {I9} (1992St09). 
M$A{-2}=+0.41 {I8}; A{-4}=-0.6 {I11} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K 408.7|g+K 407|g)<0.02 with contribution from the E1, 407|g in {+215}Ra; A{-2}=-0.4 {I1}; A{-4}=0 (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I1}; |a(L)exp=0.004 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.007 {I4}; A{-2}=+0.24 {I8}; A{-4}=-0.19 {I10} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.013 {I1}; |a(L)exp=0.004 {I1}; |a(M)exp=0.001 {I1}; A{-2}=+0.29 {I8}; A{-4}=-0.08 {I13} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2} resulted in |d=0.0 {I3} (1992St09); A{-2}=-0.58 {I15}; A{-4}=0.3 {I2} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=0.12 {I5}; |a(M)exp=0.06 {I1} (1992St09); A{-2}=+0.38 {I8}; A{-4}=-0.34 {I12} (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp=0.29 {I13} with contribution from the |a(K 191.9|g) [E2] line; A{-2}=-0.33 {I9}; A{-4}=0 (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.053 {I4}; |a(M)exp=0.015 {I2} with contribution from overlaping conversion-electron lines of other E2 transitions in {+216}Ra, and another |g in {+214}Ra and an E2 transition in {+212}Rn (1992St09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$E|g=772.3 {I4} (2004He25), 773.2 {i10} (1988Fu10), 772.8 (1987AdZU), 771.5 (1983Lo16) 
$ POL=-0.13 {I1} (1988Fu10) 
$ EKC=0.0257 11, ELC=0.0096 6, EMC=0.0027 5 (1989Dr02). Value of EMC=0.00027 in 1989Dr02 seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=851.8 {I1} (2004He25), 852.4 {I10} (1988Fu10), 852.2 (1987AdZU), 850.1 (1983Lo16) 
RI$ 64 {I3} (1988Fu10) in {+206}Pb({+12}C,3n|g), E=67 MeV; 86 {I9} (1983Lo16) in {+208}Pb({+13}C,6n|g), E=95 MeV 
$ POL=-0.04 {I2} (1988Fu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=196.1 {I4} (2004He25), 195.9 {I10} (1988Fu10), 196.0 (1987AdZU), 195.1 (1983Lo06), 
RI$ 42 {I12} (1988Fu10) in {+206}Pb({+12}C,3n|g), E=67 MeV; 30 {I3} (1983Lo16) in {+208}Pb({+13}C,6n|g), E=95 MeV 
$ POL=-0.08 {I7} (1988Fu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$E|g=1048.3 {I4} (2004He25), 1048.3 {I10} (1988Fu10), 1048.1 (1987AdZU) 
RI$ 18 {I2} (1988Fu10) in {+206}Pb({+12}C,3n|g), E=67 MeV 
$ POL=-0.04 {I5} (1988Fu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=173.0 {I10} (1988Fu10), E|g=173.4 (1987AdZU). 
RI$ 2 {I1} (1988Fu10) in {+206}Pb({+12}C,3n|g), E=67 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=175.8 {I10} (1988Fu10), E|g=175.9 (1987AdZU). 
RI$ 5 {I2} (1988Fu10) in {+206}Pb({+12}C,3n|g), E=67 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=841.8 {I10} (1988Fu10), 841.6 (1987AdZU) 
RI$ 18 {I2} (1988Fu10) in {+206}Pb({+12}C,3n|g), E=67 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from intensity balance. For any multipolarity other than E1, I(|g+ce)(51|g) would be greater than I(|g+ce)(688|g). Note that |d(M2/E1)<0.07 from the requirement I(|g+ce)(51|g)<I(|g+ce)(688|g). From RUL, |d<0.002 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K/L>2.17 {I50} (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=0.24 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.248 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I19} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 35 {I3} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.35 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.338 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I17} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 100 {I7} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(tot)exp<0.63 (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=-0.220 {I20}, A{-4}=0.134 {I28} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 70.4 {I20} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2011MuZZ. In 1984Ro20 a 365.5|g with I|g=2 is tentatively placed from a level at 1415.7 keV. 
$A{-2}=-0.51 {I13}; A{-4}=-0.26 {I21} (1984Ro20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.39 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.359 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.070 {I34} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 43.6 {I31} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.32 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.13 {I2} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.283 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.030 {I32} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 35.4 {I12} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp<0.05 (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=-0.246 {I34}, A{-4}=-0.088 {I51} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 24.8 {I8} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.38 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.315 {I36}, A{-4}=0.009 {I49} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 38.3 {I21} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.36 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.282 {I24}, A{-4}=0.009 {I32} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 43.4 {I15} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.04 (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=-0.16 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=-0.206 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I18} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 49.5 {I19} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.34 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I2} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.324 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I33} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 35 {I15} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I2} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.161 {I41}, A{-4}=-0.074 {I57} (1984Su10) 
E$Doublet (1984Su10,1984Ro20). The other component is weak (1984Ro20). 
RI$other: 22.3 {I7} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$K/L=5.5 {I10}, |a(K)exp>1.2 (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=-0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=-0.211 {I28}, A{-4}=0.204 {I39} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 24.2 {I7} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp>0.13 (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=0.24 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.248 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I19} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 43 {I3} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$K/L=0.66 {I30} (1984Ro20). 
M$A{-2}=0.38 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.325 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.049 {I15} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 71.1 {I18} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.405 {I62}, A{-4}=0.123 {I84} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 15.0 {I6} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I1} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=-0.147 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I17} (1984Su10) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.07 {I3} (1984Ro20) suggests E2 multipolarity with M1 admixture. However, the angular distribution implies a dipole nature. The intensity balance at the 1896.4-keV level is: I(|g+ce)(404.7|g)-I(|g+ce)(228.9|g)|? 0, if 404.7|g is E2 and |?25 if it is M1. 
RI$other: 88 {I3} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.25 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I11} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.247 {I59}, A{-4}=0.136 {I81} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 13.4 {I8} (1984Su10). 
E$from 2011MuZZ. A 501.4|g is placed by 1987SuZY as directly feeding the 2303-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.47 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I3} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.299 {I40}, A{-4}=-0.111 {I54} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 30.6 {I9} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 2011MuZZ. A 425.6|g is placed by 1987SuZY as depopulating a level at 3257 keV. A 425.8|g is unassigned in 1984Ro20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.21 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I24} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=0.368 {I39}, A{-4}=0.003 {I53} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 21.8 {I10} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.27 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I11} (1984Ro20); A{-2}=-0.233 {I36}, A{-4}=-0.035 {I50} (1984Su10) 
RI$other: 22.8 {I9} (1984Su10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 1987SuZY. 1984Ro20 observe this |g but give no assignment, while 2011MuZZ place a 495.0|g as depopulating a level at 4680 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$DCO(D)=1.45 {I13}, POL=+0.10 {I5} 
M,MR$E1+M2 with |d=3.8 {I8} is ruled out because it would require an isomeric T{-1/2}(331)|?75 ns which however is not seen in the early-delayed analysis for isomer (2023Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$intensity range of 2.1 to 3.9, based on total intensity balance at the 29/2- and 33/2- states assuming the E 2 multipolarity of the 93-keV transition (2023Ma32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
TI$|>12 {I7} from intensity balance at the 793.4 level; <8.6 from intensity balance at the 389.1 level 
M$|DJ=1, dipole from |g|g(|q)(DCO) (1992Wi14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$Mult(83.7|g)>E1 would yield unreasonably large transition intensity (1982Fe04). 
RI$from I(|g)(83.7|g)/I(|g)(380.9|g)=25 {I5}/71 {I3} (1982Fe04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL for 416.9+415.0 doublet 
E,RI$doublet according to 1989Sc33. Part of the intensity of the 416.9 line belongs to 417|g from 3806 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$1982Fe04 report I(|g)(140.9|g)/I(|g)(440.0|g)=0.65 {I9}, which gives I(|g)(140.9)=17 {I2}; This ratio in 1986Go21, and 1983Ga11 is 0.32 {I5} and 0.20, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement proposed by the evaluators based on energy difference 
RI$I|g=4 {I1} is the measured intensity for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved transition with E|g=48.4 in E=65 MeV (1992Wi02) only. Here E|g is from level-energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 6.36 {I23} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15); 3.88 {I15} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02); 2.80 {I15} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 67 {I2} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 83 {I5} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02). Other: 123 {I6} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36). Unweighted average of all the three results is 91 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved transition with E|g=61.4 in E=65 MeV (1992Wi02) only. Here E|g is from level-energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 19.7 {I16} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15); 26.1 {I13} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02); 31.9 {I16} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from E=68 MeV (2017He15). Tentative |g with E|g=392.3 {I5} in E=65 MeV (1992Wi02). Not reported in E=67 MeV (1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 26.8 {I25} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15); 35.9 {I16} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02); 46.9 {I26} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 94 {I3} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 71 {I3} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02). Other: 46.9 {I26} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from E=68 MeV (2017He15). Tentative 373.3 {I5} |g in E=65 MeV (1992Wi02), with no intensity given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g from E=65 MeV (1992Wi02) only, with I|g=425 {I75}. Treated as uncertain by evaluators, since not confirmed in 2017He15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from E=68 MeV (2017He15). Tentative 392.6 {I5} |g in E=65 MeV (1992Wi02), with no intensity given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 56 {I4} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15); 36.4 {I15} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02); 30.7 {I16} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 21.7 {I11} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 25.5 {I10} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02). Other: 11.7 {I5} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 28 {I3} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 25.9 {I35} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02). Other: 11.7 {I5} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 34 {I6} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02) and 57 {I8} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36). Other: 13.4 {I15} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15). Unweighted average of all three results is 35 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from E=68 MeV (2017He15) only. Tentative |g in E=65 MeV (1992Wi02), with no I|g; |g not reported in 1987Co36 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 33.3 {I22} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 29.6 {I23} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02); 29.4 {I20} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 38.0 {I14} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 42 {I6} (E=65 MeV, 1992Wi02). Other: 59.5 {I27} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36). Unweighted average of all the three results is 47 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 84 {I4} (E=68 MeV, 2017He15) and 73 {I5} (E=67 MeV, 1987Co36). In E=65 MeV (1992Wi02), I|g is available for only the 465|g, thus no branching ratio can be deduced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 97.2 {I2} (1992Li09) and 97.10 {I17} (1987El02). 
M$|a(L)exp is |?60% lower than the theoretical value for M1 (1987El02), however, no other multipolarity is consistent with this conversion coefficient, thus definite M1 is assigned for 97.14-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
TI$from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 52-keV level using %|a=0 for 52-keV level (1992Li09). 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(theory) for assumed mult=[M1+E2] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 140.0 {I1} (1992Li09) and 140.02 {I9} (1987El02). 
M$|a(L)exp is consistent with M1 (|d(E2/M1)<0.5) (1987El02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
TI$from in-out intensity balance at 113.7 level. 20% uncertainty is assumed by the evaluators 
MR$from |a=132 {I62}, deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance at the 113-keV level using measured |a intensity of 13.2% from 1992Li09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 152.0 {I1} (1992Li09) and 151.98 {I12} (1987El02). 
M,MR$from |a=3.3 {I10} (deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance at the 152-keV level using measured |a intensity of 26.4% from 1992Li09). |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp from 1987El02 give |d(E2/M1)<1.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Assignment to {+219}Ra is considered questionable by evaluators, as this |g is not reported by 1992Wi02 and 2017He15, thus this |g is not included in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1992Wi02 and 2017He15. 1987Co36 placed it from a 1625, (27/2-) level in the same band as in 1992Wi02, but with a different ordering of |g rays in a cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$294.8 and 295 form a doublet in {+219}Ra 
M$|a(L)exp normalized to |a(K)=0.075 for 294.8|g assumed as E2. Measured |a(L)exp is consistent with E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1992Wi02 and 2017He15. 1987Co36 placed it from a 128.7, (11/2-) level in the same band as in 1992Wi02, but with a different ordering of |g rays in a cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1992Wi02 and 2017He15. 1987Co36 placed this |g from a 792 level feeding 495.4 level (corresponding 512.5 level here) 
E$249.5 and 249 form a doublet in {+219}Ra 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$doublet with |g in {+220}Ra 
$Placement from 1992Wi02 and 2017He15. 1987Co36 placed this |g from a tentative 1938 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$413.1, 414.0 and 415.1 form a multiplet in {+219}Ra and {+218}Ra 
$Placement from 1992Wi02 and 2017He15. 1987Co36 placed this |g from 542.7, (15/2-) level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$301.9 and 302 form a doublet in {+219}Ra 
$Placement from 1992Wi02 and 2017He15. 1987Co36 placed this |g tentatively from a tentative 1566 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$A 320.4 {I5} |g with I|g=2.3 {I11} in 1992Wi02 and a 321.3 {I10} with I|g=0.4 {I1} in 2017He15 was placed from 876, 17/2+ level. This placement is not included in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g is not reported in 1992Wi02 and 2017He15, treated as uncertain by evaluators and is not included in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this |g is a doublet with an unassigned |g ray. In 2017He15, this |g feeds 3791, 49/2- level. This placement is not included in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$doublet with an unassigned |g ray. 
$Tentative |g in 1987Co36 is not reported in 1992Wi02 and 2017He15 and is not included in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 2000Ri12, uncertainty assigned by evaluators. This |g is not given in 1992Wi02 Such a level was known from the |a decay of {+223}Th (1992Li09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g in 1992Wi02 only. With the intensity reported in 1992Wi02, this |g should have been detected by 2017He15. Evaluators treat this |g as uncertain 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g from 1992Wi02 only. With the intensity reported in 1992Wi02, this |g should have been detected by 2017He15. Evaluators treat this |g as uncertain 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp from gate at 362|g, and normalized to E2 for 334|g 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp 
E$from 2000Ri12, uncertainty assigned by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$from 2000Ri12, uncertainty assigned by evaluators. 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp 
$|a(L)exp from gate at 362|g, and normalized to E2 for 334|g, corrected for M line of 97|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp 
$|a(K)exp and |a(L)exp from gates at 359 and 396|g, and normalized to E2 for 295|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp. |d(E2/M1)<0.6 
$|a(K)exp from gates at 129|g and 334|g, and normalized to E2 for 362|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp 
$|a(L)exp from gates at 362|g and 388|g, and normalized to E2 for 334|g, corrected for M line of 97|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty of 0.1 keV in 2017He15 increased to 1.0 by evaluators, consistent with uncertainties for other weak |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 111.11 {I1} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay, 111.15 {I1} from {+226}Th |a decay, and 111.2 {I2} from ({+136}Xe,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 130.98 {I1} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay and 131.04 {I1} from {+226}Th |a decay 
RI$from {+226}Th |a decay. Other: 31.8 {I31} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay 
M$from intensity balance in {+226}Th |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 242.11 {I1} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay and 242.14 {I1} from {+226}Th |a decay 
RI$from {+226}Th |a decay. Other: 100 {I10} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 190.24 {I2} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay, 190.31 {I1} from {+226}Th |a decay, and 190.7 {I2} from ({+136}Xe,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 206.18 {I2} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay and 206.25 {I1} from {+226}Th |a decay 
RI$from {+226}Th |a decay. Other: 100 {I10} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. 
RI$from B(E2,157|g)/B(E1,172|g) ratio in Coulomb excitation; this |g has not been observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 723.45 {I4} from {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay and 722.9 {I4} from {+226}Th |a decay 
RI$other: 15 {I6} from {+226}Th |a decay is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 913.9 {I4} from {+226}Th |a decay 
RI$other: 66 {I33} from {+226}Th |a decay is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 111.15 {I1} (1995Ko54), 111.12 {I3} (1976Ku08). Others: 111.1 {I3} (1956Sm88, from L2, L3, M2, M3, N and O conversion lines using |b-ray spectrometer), 112 {I3} (1956As38), 111 {I2} (1967LoZZ), 111.3 (1969Pe17), 111 (1969Br10). 
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=111.135 
RI$weighted average of 2.908 {I145} (1995Ko54), 3.290 {I200} (1976Ku08), 3.3 {I2} (1969Pe17). Others: 3.8 {I4} (1961Ru06, author mentioned that intensities are not determined experimentally so limits on error are to be used from previous work 1956As38), 4.8 {I4} (1956As38) 
$Relative I|g=100 (1969Br10) 
M$L12:L3:M23:N=17.0 {I22}:11.6 {I19}:9.5 {I17}:3.2 {I7} (1967LoZZ), |a(L2)=2.4 {I4}, |a(L)=4.1 {I5} (1974Va28). I(ce) values given here were normalized to Ice(K)(230|g of {+226}Ac decay)=5.45. For absolute I(ce) values per 100|a decays, multiply by 0.269 {I18}. Value of |a(exp)=6.24 {I25} was deduced by 1969Pe17 from |a|g-coin data. Other: L/M+N+=3.12 (1969Br10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 131.04 {I1} (1995Ko54), 131.02 {I5} (1976Ku08). Other: 131 {I5} (1956As38), 131 (1969Br10). 
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=131.021 
RI$weighted average: 0.262 {I13} (1995Ko54), 0.278 {I13} (1976Ku08). Others: 0.4 {I1} (1956As38), 0.3 {I1} (1961Ru06, author mentioned that intensities are not determined experimentally so limits on error are to be used from previous work 1956As38) 
$Relative I|g=11 (1969Br10). 
M$from intensity balance. No ce lines were observed (1969Br10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 242.14 {I1} (1995Ko54), 242.12 {I5} (1976Ku08). Other: 242 {I3} (1956As38), 242 (1969Br10). 
RI$weighted average: 0.866 {I26} (1995Ko54), 0.866 {I40} (1976Ku08). Others: 1.2 {I1} (1956As38), 1.2 {I4} (1963Le17), 0.9 {I1} (1961Ru06, author mentioned that intensities are not determined experimentally so limits on error are to be used from previous work 1956As38). 
$Relative I|g=29 (1969Br10), 
M$from |a(K)exp|?0.06 (estimated by the evaluator from the (|a)(ce) spectrum shown by 1969Br10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 190.31 {I1} (1995Ko54), 190.30 {I5} (1976Ku08). Other: 197 {I10} (1956As38), 188 (1969Br10). 
RI$weighted average: 0.112 {I4} (1995Ko54), 0.109 {I6} (1976Ku08). Others: 0.40 {I5} (1956As38), 0.30 {I5} (1961Ru06, author mentioned that I|g are not determined experimentally so limits on error are to be used from previous work 1956As38) 
$Relative I|g=3.3 (1969Br10) 
M$from ce data of 1976Ku08 (measured ce intensities were not given). Only E2 multipolarity yields an intensity balance at the 301.42-keV level. Other: L/M+N+=1.8 (1969Br10), I(ce)=0.4 (1956As38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from 1992Ru01 in {+222}Fr |b{+-}. The E|g value not used in the least-squares fitting procedure. Fitted E|g=75.228 {I13}. 
RI$from I|g(75|g)/I|g(206|g)=0.017 {I4}/100 {I10} (1992Ru01,{+222}Fr |b{+-} decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 206.25 {I1} (1995Ko54), 206.23 {I5} (1976Ku08). Other: 207 (1969Br10). 
RI$weighted average: 0.192 {I6} (1995Ko54), 0.189 {I8} (1976Ku08). 
$Relative I|g=5.5 (1969Br10). 
M$from ce data of 1976Ku08 (measured ce intensities were not given). Only E1 multipolarity is consistent with the intensity balance at the 317.35 level. Other: I(ce)/I|g|<0.04 (1969Br10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 172.3 {I2} (1995Ko54), 172.3 {I3} (1976Ku08) 
RI$weighted average: 0.00030 {I15} (1995Ko54), 0.00020 {I2} (1976Ku08, |g observed only in |g|g-coin in this work) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 672.02 {I2} (1995Ko54), 671.9 {I3} (1976Ku08). 
RI$weighted average: 0.00029 {I2} (1995Ko54), 0.00028 {I3} (1976Ku08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$poor fit in the level scheme, level-energy difference=803.036; uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting procedure 
E$weighted average: 802.7 {I1} (1995Ko54), 802.7 {I5} (1976Ku08). 
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=803.037 
RI$unweighted average: 0.000013 {I4} (1995Ko54), 0.00006 {I2} (1976Ku08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 707.52 {I9} (1995Ko54), 707.5 {I5} (1976Ku08). 
RI$weighted average: 0.00005 {I1} (1995Ko54), 0.00006 {I2} (1976Ku08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 782.9 {I5} (1995Ko54), 783.0 {I5} (1976Ku08) 
RI$weighted average: 0.000052 {I10} (1995Ko54), 0.00009 {I3} (1976Ku08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from 1992Ru01 in {+222}Fr |b{+-} decay. 
RI$I|g(1025|g)/I|g(707|g+783|g)=0.060 {I10}/1.76 {I9} (1992Ru01,{+222}Fr |b{+-}) gives I|g(1025|g)=0.0000036 {I8}, which is adopted here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$I|g(59|g,E3)/I|g(190|g,E2)=7.7|*10{+-11} {I38} deduced by evaluators from B(E3)/B(E2) ratio. This |g is not included in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference in the Adopted Levels; |g not included in the Adopted dataset 
RI$from B(E1,15.8|g)/B(E1,206|g) 
$I|g(15.8|g,E3)/I|g(206|g,E1)=10|*10{+-16} {I5}, deduced by evaluators from B(E3)/B(E1) ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference in the Adopted Levels 
$I|g deduced by evaluators from B(E2,156.5|g)/B(E1,172|g) ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E not observed. From {+227}Th |a decay. 
RI from I|g(29|g)/I|g(79|g)|?0.0026 in {+227}Th |a decay, and I|g(79|g)=294 {I41} in {+223}Fr |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$|a=5.4E2 13 from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 29.9 level, and %|a=2.90 {I15} (1964Ba33). 
M$|d=0.54, from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=2.4:8.7:11 (1957Pi31); |d=0.29 {I7}, from |a(L)exp=270 {I80} (1970Ge02,1977Ma32); |d=1.7 {I4} from L| x ray intensities (1972Sc44). |d=0.41 {I10} from |a(exp)=5.4E2 13, deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 29.9 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 50.1 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=1.4:1.4:1.7 (1971Br28); |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). 
RI %I|g=8.4 {I6} (1969Pe17) and %I|g=8.18 {I17} (1990Ko40), both absolute intensity measurements, agree with %I|g=8 {I1}, from adopted I|g and decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other values: 31.63 {I5} (1957Pi31,1977Ma32), 31.63 {I2} (1970Ge02,1977Ma32). 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3) exp=3.6:4.1:5.4:1.5:2.5:2.1 (1957Pi31). 
MR$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=4.8 {I3}:5.3 {I3}:5.4 {I3} (1971Br28). Other value: |d=0.28 {I5}, from A{-2}=-0.88 {I5}, A{-4}=0.10 {I6}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.09 {I1}:3.5 {I2}:3.0 {I2} (1969Br27). A{-2}=0.49 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.33 {I5}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(exp)=2070 {I370}, deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 79.7 level, and I|a=3.00 {I15}. 
RI from 1990Br23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 79.8 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.13 {I1}:0.08 {I1}:0.085 (1969Br27); |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). A{-2}=0.44 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5} |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
E other value: 62.2 {I1} (1968Da10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other values: 93.5 {I10} (1966Po02), 94.0 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.082 {I8}:0.042 {I4}:0.041 {I4} (1971Br28). A{-2}=-0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E other value: 68.7 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M,MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.25 {I3}:0.20 {I2}:0.14 {I1} (1971Br28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.015:0.34 {I3}:0.26 {I3} (1969Br27); |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=0.46 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.27 {I12}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 95.2 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M from ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.062 {I6}:0.049 {I5} (1971Br28). A{-2}=-0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I5}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 113.1 {I1} (1968Da10). 
RI from 1971Br29. I|g=6.6 {I3} (1993Ab01). 
M from |a(L1)exp=0.032 (1971Br29,1977Ma32). A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.035 15, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.13 {I6} and I|g(44.|g from 174.58 level)=0.03 {I3}. 
M from |a(L1)exp=23 {I12} (1971Br28,1977Ma32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1971Br29. I|g=6.6 {I3} (1993Ab01). 
M$from ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.35:0.24 (1971Br27) and |a(L)exp=3.99 (1971Br29,1977Ma32). A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.035 {I15}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.44 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I13}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
E other value: 184.8 {I2} (1968Da10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2): exp=0.24:0.047 {I5}:0.006 {I1} (1971Br28). ce(L1)=47 given by 1971Br28 is probably a typographical error (1977Ma32). |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). 
MR$from A{-2}=0.58 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=54:9.7 {I10}:|?0.6 (1971Br28). 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 117.2 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M$from ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=|?0.005:|?0.003 (1971Br28); |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 236.0 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=61:8.7 {I9}:2.6 {I3}:1.7 {I3} (1971Br28). A{-2}=0.00 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other values: 256.2 {I1} (1968Da10); 256.25 {I5} (1965Br23,1977Ma32); 256.36 {I8} (1957Pi31). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=71:13 {I1}:47 {I5}:24 {I2} (1971Br28). A{-2}=0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 286.1 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=77: 13.3 {I8}:2.15 {I20} (1971Br28). A{-2}=0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a|g(|q) (1990Br23); |a(L1)exp|?0.26 (1971Br28,1977Ma32). A{-2}=-0.51 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
E other value: 43.7 {I2} (1968Da10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 206.0 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.033:0.0067:0.036 {I4}:0.020 {I2} (1971Br28); A{-2}=0.12 {I5}, A{-4}=0.04 {I6}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 2.1 {I4} (1990Br23), 4.1 {I7} (1998Jo08), and 1.9 {I2} (1971Br28, 1977Ma32). Negative sign is from 1998Jo08. |d=1.9 {I2} from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=12:|?2:2.4 (1971Br28,1977Ma32). 
E other value: 250.1 {I1} (1968Da10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L3) exp=69:13 {I2}: <0.003 (1971Br28). 
MR$from A{-2}=0.18 {I10}, A{-4}=0.05 {I15}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from 1972He18. 
E other values: 299.8 {I1} (1968Da10), 299.7 {I6} (1966Po02). 
M from |g(|q,H) and |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E other values: 329.7 {I1} (1968Da10), 329.7 {I8} (1966Po02). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1) exp=75:9 {I2} (1971Br28). A{-2}=0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 48.2 {I1} (1957Pi31,1977Ma32). 
M from ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=1.1 {I1}: 1.0 {I1} (1971Br29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 20.4 {I3} (1968Da10). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=34:5.4 {I10}:36 {I4}:18 {I4} (1971Br28); |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). A{-2}=0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other values: 210.6 {I1} (1968Da10), 211.4 {I7} (1966Po02). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1) exp=77:8.5 {I17} (1971Br28); |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=0.03 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 254.2 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1) exp=26:|?3.5 (1971Br28). A{-2}=0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other values: 272.5 {I2} (1968Da10); 272.9 {I10} (1966Po02). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.11 {I2} (1971Br28,1977Ma32). |d=4.9+21-22 from ce data; |d=-29+20-29 |g(|q,H); |d=-28+10-34 |a|g(|q); |d=8.5 {I18}, from A{-2}=-0.16, A{-4}=0.08 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
E other values: 304.4 {I2} (1968Da10), 304.5 {I10} (1966Po02). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=100:17:2.2 {I3}:0.25 {I8}; |a(K)exp=0.95 {I12} (1971Br28,1977Ma32) suggests an E0 component. |d=-0.22+5-7, |g(|q,H); |d=0.17+7-5, |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). |d=-0.07 {I4}, from A{-2}=0.52 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
CC experimental value (1966Po02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 334.2 {I1} (1968Da10), 333.7 {I13} (1966Po02). 
M,MR$weighted average of |d=0.58 {I7}, from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=370:70 {I10}:15 {I3}:|?2 (1971Br28), and |d=0.62 {I4}, from A{-2}=0.68 {I2}, A{-4}=0.12 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). Negative sign is from 1998Jo08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 262.9 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.038 {I15} (1971Br28,1977Ma32); |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=0.02 {I7}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 292.4 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M$from |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=0.36 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I9}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other values: 312.6 {I2} (1968Da10), 313.5 {I13} (1966Po02). 
M,MR$weighted average of |d=-0.14 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1990Br23); and |d=0.20 {I4}, from A{-2}=0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). Other value:|d=0.41+6-9, from |a(K)exp=0.52 {I8} (1971Br28,1977Ma32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other values: 342.4 {I1} (1968Da10), 342.4 {I8} (1966Po02). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=90:17 {I3}:7 {I1}:5 {I2} (1971Br28). Original values of ce(L2) and ce(L3) reported by 1971Br28 seem to be incorrect. Values presented here have been corrected by 1977Ma32. |d=-0.43+12-16, |g(|q,H); |d=-0.62+13-22, |a|g(|q) (1990Br23). |d=1.30 {I25}, from A{-2}=-0.62 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=0.29 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I8}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). Other value: |?0.2, from ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=0.07:0.023 {I2} (1971Br28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 212.7 {I2} (1968Da10). 
MR$sign is from |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2): exp=10.5:1.8 {I4}:0.35 {I7} (1971Br28). Other value: |d=-0.35 {I35}, from A{-2}=0.60 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 281.3 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=97:17 {I2}:|?3.4 (1971Br28). |d=-0.43+5-8, |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). A{-2}=-0.28 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I9}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 350.6 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I5} (1971Br28,1977Ma32). A{-2}=0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other values: 140.9 {I10} (1966Po02), 141.2 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M from |a(K)exp|?0.15 (1971Br28,1977Ma32). A{-2}=-0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=0.04 {I6}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=0.48 {I11}, A{-4}=0.46 {I17}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
E other value: 201.4 {I3} (1968Da10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from ce(K):ce(L1) exp=8.5:1.5 {I2} (1971Br28). A{-2}=0.48 {I6}, A{-4}=0.11 {I9}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$negative sign is from |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 
MR$weighted average of |d=0.12+2-1, |a|g(|q) (1990Br23), and |d=0.16 {I2}, from A{-2}=-0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=0.06 {I3}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). |d; other values: |d=0.04+7-8, |g(|q,H) (1990Br23). |d=0.25 {I8} from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=30:5.2 {I5}:0.67 {I13} (1971Br28). 
M$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=30:5.2 {I5}:0.67 {I13} (1971Br28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 314.8 {I2} (1968Da10). 
M from |a(K)exp|?0.024 (1971Br29,1977Ma32). A{-2}=0.52 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.6 {I2} (1971Br28,1977Ma32). A{-2}=0.34 {I9}, A{-4}=0.18 {I12}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other values: 383.3 {I2} (1968Da10), 384.0 {I8} (1966Po02). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.28 {I6} (1971Br28,1977Ma32). 
MR$from A{-2}=0.54 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I15}, |a|g(|q) (1998Jo08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 117.2 {I1} (1968Da10). 
M from ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=|?0.005:|?0.003 (1971Br28), and |a(L1)exp|?0.029 (1971Br28,1977Ma32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from Coulomb excitation based on extensive data for yield measurements. This value agrees with 54 {I19} from ({+58}Ni,{+60}Ni|g), but not with 26 {I10} from |a decay and 139 {I39} from ({+136}Xe,X|g). Weighted average of all four measurements is 43 {I13} with reduced |h{+2}=3.4 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Uncertainty of 12 in 142.7 and 182.3 |g rays confirmed in e-mail communication of June 12, 2014 from P. Butler 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1+L2)=131 {I28}, Ice(L3)=98 {I15}, Ice(M)=60 {I10}, Ice(N)=21 {I5} 
$E|g=84.38 {I3}, I|g=14.6 {I12} (1979Va20) 
$I|g=11.0 {I11} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=11.5 {I10}, Ice(L1+L2)=2.6 {I6} 
$E|g=215.969 {I16}, I|g=189 {I9} (1979Va20) 
$I|g=203 {I10} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp agrees with M1 or E2; E2 in Adopted Gammas 
$Ice(L1+L2)=1.9 {I7} 
$E|g=166.304 {I30}, I|g=2.4 {I2} (1979Va20) 
$I|g=2.33 {I11} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g/I|g(182|g)=0.56 {I13} from Adopted Gammas. 1980KuZL report I|g<0.8 and do not place this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$reported earlier by 1977Ku15 in their study of {+228}Th |a decay, I|g/I|g(742|g)|?1. Not listed in 1980KuZL or 1981Ku02, although a 992.1|g is labeled in spectrum figure 1 in 1981Ku02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp agrees with M1, E2 or E1, but |DJ|p requires E2 
$Ice(K)<0.2 
M$ E1,E2 from |a(K)exp<0.016; but E1 is inconsistent with |DJ|p 
$E|g=762.649 {I23}, I|g=14.1 {I7} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=762.53 {I6}, I|g=13.7 {I7} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=1.0 {I3} 
$E|g=837.062 {I19}, I|g=59 {I3} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=836.90 {I7}, I|g=60.0 {I30} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=968.77 {I11}, I|g=2.0 {I4} (1979Va20, I|g includes a sum peak) 
$E|g=968.50 {I10}, I|g=2.02 {I20} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.3 {I2} 
$E|g=799.718 {I25}, I|g=5.5 {I4} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=799.60 {I7}, I|g=6.29 {I32} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=3.3 {I7} 
$E|g=325.352 {I19}, I|g=6.0 {I4} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=325.32 {I5}, I|g=5.79 {I28} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$assuming 30% uncertainty in |a(K)exp 
$Ice(K)|?1.2 
$E|g=413.398 {I25}, I|g=4.5 {I3} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=413.40 {I5}, I|g=3.96 {I20} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=2.9 {I7} 
$E|g=335.058 {I19}, I|g=6.2 {I4} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=335.04 {I5}, I|g=6.16 {I25} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=1.2 {I5} 
$E|g=372.10 {I4}, I|g=4.0 {I3} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=372.06 {I5}, I|g=3.84 {I19} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=1.3 {I7} 
$E|g=382.514 {I25}, I|g=3.0 {I2} (1979Va20) 
$E|g=382.50 {I5}, I|g=2.84 {I14} (1980KuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=84.371 {I3} (1977Ku25) 
M$L1:L2:L3=5.19 {I21}:134.3 {I10}:100; M1:M2:M3=5.7 {I6}:121.9 {I9}:100 (1970SpZW); theory(E2): L1:L2:L3=4.8:129.7:100. From |a|g: |a(exp)=21.4 {I9} (1969Pe17), 19.6 {I14} (1968Du06), 18 {I4} (1966Co40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.55 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.48 {I18} (1989Po19) 
$E|g=166.407 {I4} (1977Ku25) 
M$from I(|g+ce)(161|g)=I|a(5173)=0.18 (1970Ba20), |a(exp)(166|g)=0.73 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from I|g/I(742|g)=1.14 {I26} in {+224}Fr |b{+-} decay in later work of these authors (1981Ku02). Spectrum in present work shows 911.2|g labeled as a background peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(17.36|g)/I|g(42.8|g)=18 {I9}/16 {I1}, as measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(42.8|g)=4.7 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(23.6|g)/I|g(55.1|g)=12 {I1}/26 {I4} as measured in {+229}Th |a decay. 
CC deduced in {+229}Th |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$(|a(L3)exp)=58 {i22}, |a(M)exp=34 {i24}, 
RI from I|g(37.8|g)/I|g(44.0|g)=0.32 {I16}/64 {I3}, as measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(44.0|g)=26 {I5}. I|g(37.8|g)=0.9 {I4} was given by 1983Ny01 which would imply large |b feeding from 3/2- {+225}Fr to the (7/2-) state at 69.36 keV in {+225}Ra. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp<0.12 
E 94.92 {I8} from {+229}Th |a decay. 
I|g(94.9|g)/I|g(77.5|g)=3.4 {I10} was measured in {+229}Th |a decay; this ratio yields I|g(94.9|g)=3.1 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=9.6 {i27}, 
I|g(56|g)/I|g(211|g)=0.28 {I2}/2.7 {I3}, measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(211|g)=8.5 {I7} from {+225}Fr |b{+-} decay yield I|g(56|g)=0.88 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=5.0 {i19}, |a(M)exp=1.2 {i2} 
I|g(87|g)/I|g(211|g)=2.5 {I1}/2.7 {I3}, measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(211|g)=8.5 {I7} from {+225}Fr |b{+-} decay yield I|g(87|g)=7.9 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(124.65|g)/I|g(211|g)=0.72 {I6}/2.7 {I3}, as measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(211|g)=8.5 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(167|g)/I|g(211|g)=0.200 {I10}/2.7 {I3}, as measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(211|g)=8.5 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(236|g)/I|g(211|g)=0.170 {I9}/2.7 {I3}, as measured in {+229}Th |a decay, and I|g(211|g)=8.5 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
TI$deduced by 1987He28 from |g|g coincidence data where 11.1|g is an unobserved intermediate transition. 
$ce line assigned as ce(L1 25|g) by 1970Tr04 could be ce(M1 11.1|g) (1987He28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
I|g=0.012 {I3} was measured. I|g of 134.2|g level is deduced by the evaluator from measured I(cek)=0.10 {I3} for deexciting the 284.49-keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
Intensity balance at the 226.9-keV level yields |a(126.4|g)=5.5 {I41}, suggesting M1,E2 multipolarity: |a(M1)=8.47, |a(E2)=3.61 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
TI from intensity balance at the 284.49-keV level. This value corresponds to |a(63.7|g)=21 {I+44-21}. 
The 63.7|g might be M1+E2, if |a|?21: |a(M1)=12.2, |a(E2)=82.7, |a(E1)=0.372. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI calculated from measured Ice(K)=0.1 and |a(K)=4.05, assuming M1 multipolarity. An E2 multipolarity would yield I|g=0.39 in which case, its photon would have been observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Ice(L2)=10.2 {I15} (1974Va28); Ice(L3)=4.8 {I11} (1967LoZZ); L12:L3:M23=32 {I6}:28 {I5}:12.9 {I5} (1967LoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g=0.463% {I12} was measured by 1990Ko40. This is 23% higher than the intensity adopted here based on the intensity balance. Note that the I|g's of 1990Ko40 for other nuclei are also consistently higher than the other available measurements. The intensity of the 53.2|g in {+234}U |a decay, for example, measured by 1990Ko40 is higher than the other measured I|g's and 27% higher than the evaluator's adopted intensity (see 1993Ak02) 
Ice(L2)=9.1% {I14} (1971Tr14); 9.2% {I8} from I|g and |a(L2)=24.39. L2:L3:M:N:O=100:95:50:14:3 (1954Ro32), L1:L2:L3=<3:100:80 (1957De56), L2:L3:M:n=91:83:46:14 (1971Tr14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Ice(L2)=0.038% {I15} (1971Tr14); 0.038 {I3} from I|g and |a(L2)=0.785. K:L2:L3:M:N=10 {I4}:38 {I15}:23 {I10}:16 {I7}:5 {I2} (1971Tr14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp|<0.20 and |a(L3)exp|<0.10 (1987Bo04). Other value: |a(L)exp + |a(M)exp|<2.6, from |g-ray intensity balance in {+226}Ra(n,|g) E=thermal (1981Vo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from (|a(L1)exp + |a(L2)exp)|<0.09, |a(L3)exp|<0.03, and |a(M)exp=0.026 {I5} (1987Bo04). Other: (|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp)|<0.9, from |g-ray intensity balance in {+226}Ra(n,|g) E=thermal (1981Vo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp|<0.07 (1987Bo04). Other: (|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp)|<2.6, from |g-ray intensity balance in {+226}Ra(n,|g) E=thermal (1981Vo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$71 {I9} in {+226}Ra(n,|g) E=thermal 
M$from |a(L)exp(135.5|g + 135.3|g)=0.3 {I1} either 135.5|g or 135.3|g must be E1. Decay scheme requires E1 multipolarity for 135.5|g (1987Bo04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 60 {I8} in {+226}Ra(n,|g) E=thermal 
M$from |a(K)exp(438.8|g + 437.1|g)=0.21 {I5} (1987Bo04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp|<0.06 (1987Bo04). Decay scheme requires E1. 
RI$other: 13 {I3} in {+226}Ra(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=1.5 {I3} (coincidence measurement), |a(L)exp=0.34 {I4} and |a(M)exp=0.076 {I1} (1987Bo04). Other value: |a(K)exp=1.5 {I3} (|g-K| x ray coin) (1981Vo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp|<0.18 (1987Bo04). Decay scheme requires E1. |a(K)exp=0.54 {I24}, a less reliable value measured by |g-K| x ray coin, suggests M1 multipolarity (1981Vo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E0
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=2.4 {I8} (1987Bo04). 
CC$From |a(K)exp=2.4 {I8} (1987Bo04) and |a/|a(K)=1.24 {I3} from BRICC. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.095 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.018 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.0046 {I8} and |a(N)exp=0.0011 {I5} (1987Bo04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance by assuming no direct |b{+-} decay feeding to this level. Note that I|g|?0.4 is reported by 1981Vo03, but it results in a significant feeding to this level, which seem highly unlikely given the |DL=3 nature of the transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=6.6 {I13} (|g-K| x ray coin) (1981Vo03), and |a(L)exp=1.0 {I3} (coincidence measurement) (1987Bo04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp(135.5|g + 135.3|g)=0.3 {I1} either 135.5|g or 135.3|g must be E1. Decay scheme requires E1 multipolarity for 135.5|g (1987Bo04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.095 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.018 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.0046 {I8} and |a(N)exp=0.0011 {I5} (1987Bo04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$ from (L1+L2)/L3/M/(N+...)=100/83.5/60/18.7 in agreement with theoretical prediction (100/82.5/50/15.6) for E2 |g-ray (1998Gu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$(L1+L2)/L3/M/(N+...)=100/57.4/39.6/13.6; theory:(100/56.9/37.7/15.1), |a(K)exp=0.27 {I5}; |a(K)theory=0.29 for E2 (1998Gu09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$proposed by 1998Gu09 based on conversion electron spectrum. 
M$|a(K)exp>1.4 (1998Gu09); |a(K)theory=0.0.0048 for E1, 0.057 for M1, and 0.013 for E2 (1998Gu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(L1+L2)(exp)=1.0 {i3}; theory: 0.017 for E1, 0.41 for E2, and 0.53 for M1. These values reveal strong component of E0 (1998Gu09) 
CC from |a(K)exp (value not given) from I(K| x ray) in |g|g and |a/|a(K) (theory, value not given) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)=133 {I40} (from I(322|g)(63.8|g)/I(322|g)(141|g), assuming the 141|g is E2) 
M$ from (L1+L2)/L3/M/(N+...)=100/83.5 {I23}/60 {I4}/18.7 {I20}; theory: (100/82.5/50/15.6) for E2 |g-ray (1998Gu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$(L1+L2)/L3/M/(N+...)=100/57.4 {I34}/39.6 {I27}/13.6 {I16}; theory: (100/56.9/37.7/15.1),|a(K)exp=0.27 {I5}; |a(K)theory=0.29 for E2 (1998Gu09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$proposed by 1998Gu09 based on conversion electron spectrum. 
M$|a(K)exp|>1.4; |a(K)theory=0.0048 for E1, 0.057 for M1, and 0.013 for E2 (1998Gu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 63.81 {I7} (1973Ta25 assigned to {+232}Th by evaluator), 63.84 {I6} (1989Sa01) 
RI from 1983Ro23 relative to I|g(84.4|g in {+224}Ra)=1.248 {I29} (1984Ge07) (the values given in 1983Ro23 are for I(84.4|g)=1.21% {I6}). Others: 0.24 {I3} (1983Mi30), 0.29 {I2} (1982Sa36) relative to I(238|g in {+212}Bi)=43.0% {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 140.83 {I15} (1989Sa01) 
RI$from I|g(141)/I|g(64)=0.078 {I14}. The ratio is a weighted average of 0.055 {I10} (1989Sa01), 0.075 {I13} (1983Mi30), 0.103 {I3} (1983Ro23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp|<0.48, |a(L1)exp + |a(L2)exp=0.72 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.35 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.26 {I3}, |a(N)exp=0.080 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=3.1 {I4}, |a(L1)exp + |a(L2)exp=0.32 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=0.015 {I8}, |a(M)exp=0.07 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Although not reported in the experimental papers, this transition is assumed to be a doublet placed also between 3{+-} and 1{+-} members of the K=0 octupole-vibrational band. Relative transition intensity of 25 {I8} for the 57.4|g deexciting the 3- state is obtained by assuming no |b transition feeding the 1- level at 710.9 keV. I(|g+ce)(57.4|g)=850 is given in 1987Ku04, and I|g=6.1 {I6} in 1986KuZL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Placement in level scheme is based on level systematics in even-even Ra and Th nuclides (2004Pe17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)=160 {I70} and |a=170 {I20}. 
E$Placement in level scheme is based on level systematics in even-even Ra and Th nuclides. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 91.8 {I4} (2000He17) and 91.8 {I8} (2020Zh01). 
TI$from I(9524|a)=26 {I2} to this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.31 {I31}, Ice(L)=0.08 {I4}, Ice(M)=0.04 {I4}. 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=0.0073 {I36}; |d overlaps all values 
CC$value within the uncertainty overlaps pure M1 and pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=1.6 {I7}, Ice(L)=0.92 {I47} 
M$from |a(K)(exp)=0.021 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.012 {I6}, and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.33 {I24}, Ice(L)=0.23 {I16} 
E$a 479-keV |g reported in 1982SaZO, placed from a 1498 level 
M$from |a(K)(exp)=0.041 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.029 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|g not seen in 1982GoZU 
$Ice(K)=1.1 {I4}, Ice(L)=0.18 {I9} 
M,MR$from |a(K)(exp)=0.18 {I9} and |a(L)exp=0.030 {I18}; |d deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code. 1985De14 deduce up to 90% E2 admixture, or |d<3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=7.4 {I12}, Ice(L)=2.3 {I8}, Ice(M)=0.53 {I18}. 
M,MR$from |a(K)(exp)=0.35 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.109 {I40}, |a(M)exp=0.025 {I9}, and |d=+0.65 {I+20-10} for |DJ=1 from |g(|q). From ce data, evaluators deduce |d=0.3 {I+5-3} using BrIccMixing code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the level scheme. The |g-ray is not seen, its existence was deduced by 1985De14 from the observed (154|g)(351|g) coincidence. Because of the prompt coincidences, T{-1/2}(1528.5 level)<10 ns; which implies M1 multipolarity for the 30.3|g (1985De14). 
TI$weighted average of 48 {I4} from intensity balance at the 1498 level, and 35 {I15} from intensity balance at the 1528 level, deduced by evaluators 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(theory) for M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=1.7 {I6}, Ice(L)=1.1 {I5}, Ice(M)=0.31 {I10}. 
M,MR$from |a(K)(exp)=0.037 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.024 {I11}, |a(M)exp=0.0067 {I23}, and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=53 {I13}, Ice(L)=12 {I3}, Ice(M)=3 {I1}. 
M,MR$from |a(K)(exp)=3.3 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.75 {I21}, |a(M)exp=0.19 {I7}, K/L=4.4 {I15}, and |d=+0.39 {I8} for |DJ=1 from |g(|q). From ce data, evaluators deduce |d=0.4 {I+5-4} using BrIccMixing code 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(L)=12 {I7}, Ice(M)=3 {I1}. 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=1.7 {I10}, |a(M)exp=0.43 {I15}, |d deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code. 1985De14 give M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$Ice(L)=6 {I4}, Ice(M)=4 {I3} (1985De14). 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=1.2 {I8}, |a(M)exp=0.8 {I6}; |d=0.17 {I+5-6} deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code. 1985De14 give |d(M2/E1)=0.15 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=55 {I8}, Ice(L)=19 {I3}, Ice(M)=5 {I3}. 
M,MR$from |a(K)(exp)=5.5 {I14}, |a(L)exp=1.9 {I5}, |a(M)exp=0.50 {I34}; BriccMixing code gives |d(E3/M2)<0.6, but this value gives B(E3)(W.u.) which is inconsistent with RUL, thus pure M2 is adopted as suggested in 1985De14, although, small E3 admixture is not excluded. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this |g is expected but not seen with certainty probably because it is obscured by strong 507.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
TI$listed in 1994De04. No ce data given for this transition, and since the |g energy is very close to the K-binding energy, the theoretical conversion coefficients are not reliable. 
$Intensity balance at the 789.16+y level: [I(|g+ce)(107.0|g) + I(|g+ce)(158.8|g) + I(|g+ce)(282.3|g)] - [I(|g+ce)(468.9|g) + I(|g+ce)(299.3|g)] = -19 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$The intensity balance at the 990.45+y level is [I(|g+ce)(308.5|g)+I(|g+ce)(360.0|g)+I(|g+ce)(574.3|g)]-[I(|g+ce) (191.4|g)+I(|g+ce)(428.1|g)]=-11 {I5}. Any E2 admixture would lower the conversion coefficient, and the intensity imbalance would become worse. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this |g was probably obscured in the singles by the 507.8|g. From 333.2|g+174.0|g, E|g=507.2 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -0.26 {I2} from DCO (1994Cr01) and 0.25 {I5} from |g(|q) (1986Dr07) 
$E|g=341.01 {I15}, I|g=82 {I4} (1986Dr07). E|g=340.8 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=0 transition; DCO value for |DJ=0, dipole is about the same as for |DJ=2, quadrupole transitions 
$E|g=221.5 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2} and A{-4} for a doublet 
$E|g=316.61 {I15}, I|g=50 {I1}, doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=316.6 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
TI$evaluators assume that the quoted intensity of 19.2 {I6} is the transition intensity, otherwise there is a large negative intensity balance at the 658 level, assuming, of course, that the placement of the 57.24|g in 1994Cr01 and 1985Kh01 is correct 
$E|g=56.6 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO for 359.11|g+359.96|g 
$E|g=359.21 {I15}, I|g=78 {I4} (1986Dr07); I|g is probably for a doublet. E|g=359.0 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO, A{-2}, A{-4} for 250.72 doublet, both |DJ=1, dipole (E1) 
$E|g=250.70 {I15}, I|g=52 {I2}, doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=250.7 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO, A{-2} and A{-4} for 150.99+150.78 doublet 
$E|g=150.84 {I15}, I|g=41 {I2}, doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=150.9 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO for 359.11|g+359.96|g 
$E|g=360.0 {I3}, part of 359.21 doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=360.2 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO, A{-2} and A{-4} for 150.99+150.78 doublet. 
$E|g=150.84 {I15}, I|g=41 {I2} for doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=150.6 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2} and A{-4} for a doublet 
$E|g=316.61 {I15}, I|g=50 {I1}, doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=316.4 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$value of 18 {I1} given by 1986Dr07 seems erroneous in view of statement by the authors in the text that this |g ray was very weak. Also this |g was not seen in the coincidence spectrum with gate at 236|g. Evaluators assume that there is a misprint in the quoted I|g value and that it is possibly 1.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2} and A{-4} for 147.26+146.3 doublet 
$Note that A{-4} is expected to be 0.0 for |DJ=1, pure dipole 
$E|g=146.90 {I15}, I|g=17 {I1}, doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=147.5 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$DCO, A{-2} and A{-4} for 147.26+146.53 doublet 
$Note that A{-4} is expected to be 0.0 for |DJ=1, pure dipole 
$E|g=146.90 {I15}, I|g=17 {I1}, doublet (1986Dr07). E|g=146.4 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$this |g forms a doublet with Ac K|b{-2} x ray (1994Cr01), thus no intensity is given 
$E|g=106.3 (1985Kh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$Evaluators have interpreted this |g ray as a doublet with I|g(doublet)=8.1 (6) (1996Li05). I|g=3.0 {I4} and E1 multipolarity was assumed from decay-scheme balance consistency. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Evaluators have interpreted this |g ray as a doublet with I|g(doublet)=8.1 (6) (1996Li05). I|g=5.1 {I5} was assumed from decay scheme balance consistency. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$Assumed by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance. 
M |a(E1)=0.257, |a(E2)=43.8, |a(M1)=8.74 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI other value: 5.0 {I6} (1990Sh15). 
M,MR from ce(L1) + ce(L2)/ce(L3) exp=2.5+6-4 (1989Ah05). 
E other value: 42.5 {I2} (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other value: 50.5 {I2} (1989Ah05). 
RI other value: 2.9 {I6} (1990Sh15) 
M,MR from ce(L1) + ce(L2)/ce(L3) exp=5.3+25-15 (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a=0.32 {I11}, |a(L3)exp<0.65, and ce(L1) + ce(L2)/ce(L3) exp= 1.6 {I5} (1989Ah05). 
E other value: 64.9 {I1} (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(doublet)=2.7 {I6} (1989Ah05) and I|g(45.6|g, 110 level)|?0.5. 
M$from experimental |a(doublet)=5.2 {I15} (1989Ah05), assuming the other 45.6|g which deexcites the 110 level is M1. 
E other value: 45.5 {I1} (1990Sh15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from experimental I|a(6356|a)=8.0, and I|a|?4 to 110 level. Only conversion electron lines were observed (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(doublet)=2.7 {I6}, experimental |a(doublet)=5.2 {I15}, and |g-ray transition intensity balance at 64.6 level needed to reproduce the experimental I|a=9.6. The existence of this doublet was inferred from the measured |a=5.2 {I15}, which could not be less than 36 (for pure M1) (1989Ah05). 
M from ce data (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 67.9 {I1} (1989Ah05). 
RI other value: 10.1 {I8} (1990Sh15). 
M from ce data (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E other value: 110.4 {I1} (1989Ah05). 
RI other value: 31 {I3} (1990Sh15). 
M from |a(K)exp<1.1 and |a(L)exp<2.0 (1989Ah05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$1993Sh07 placed 28.8|g from a 66.0 and 80.5 levels. 1994Ah03 reported two |g rays at 28.3 and 28.8, former from 80.4 level, and the latter from 52.1 level based on coincidence data 
$E|g=28.8 {I1}, I|g=1.33 {I20} (1993Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Part of 51.9|g from 130 level in 1993Sh07 
E$2004Sh25 argue against the placement or existence of this |g ray in 1994Ah03, and suggest that its appearance in |a|g coincidence data of 1994Ah03 may be due to |a+ce sum line. Its implied M2 multipolarity is also problematic for J|p=2+ for 52 level and 0- for g.s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$1993Sh07 placed 41.1|g from 78.4 level 
$E|g=41.1 {I1}, I|g=0.48 {I8} (1993Sh07) 
M$(M1) in 1993Sh07, but no argument given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$2004Sh25 suggest that this |g may belong to {+220}Fr from {+224}Ac |a decay, yet |a|g coincidence data in figure 3 of 1994Ah03 clearly show this |g ray, and this |g is also listed in |a|g|g coin data in table 4 of 1994Ah03. Its implied M2 multipolarity is, however, problematic, for J|p=3- for 78 level and 1+ for 29.8 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$1993Sh07 placed 54.2|g from a 184.2 level. 
$E|g=54.2 {I1}, I|g=1.30 {I15} (1993Sh07), placed from a 184.2 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=51.9 {I1}, I|g=2.20 {I20} (1993Sh07); 51.8, 52.0, 52.1 |g rays with total I|g=2.10 {I18} in 1994Ah03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$1993Sh07 placed 73.3|g from a 90.3 level. 
$E|g=73.3 {I3}, I|g=0.18 {I5} (1993Sh07), placed from a 90.3 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$1993Sh07 placed 53.1|g from a 90.3 levels. 
$E|g=53.1 {I1}, I|g=0.90 {I15}, mult=(E1) (1993Sh07), placed from a 90.3 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(250.5|g+252.6|g)=0.95 {I26} (1994Ah03) 
$E|g=252.6 {I10}, I|g=0.35 {I20} (1993Sh07); unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(242.6|g+244.7|g)=1.2 {I3} (1994Ah03) 
$E|g=245.0 {I10}, I|g=0.40 {I20} (1993Sh07); unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=269.0 {I10}, I|g=0.50 {I20} (1993Sh07); 267.8, 268.7, 269.1 |g rays with total I|g=0.86 {I13} in 1994Ah03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,M$2004Sh25 suggest placement of 330.4|g from 354 level based on |a|g coincidence displayed in top panel of figure 7 in 1994Ah03. This placement is consistent with M1 multipolarity from experimental K-conversion coefficient in 1994Ah03. Evaluators suggest double placement of this |g ray based on |a|g coincidence with |a groups to both the 354 and 360 levels (see |a|g coin figure 7 in 1994Ah03) 
$E|g=330.2 {I3}, I|g=1.1 {I5} (1993Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp(250.5|g+252.6|g)=0.95 {I26} (1994Ah03) 
$E|g=251.1 {I8}, I|g=0.45 {I25} (1993Sh07); unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from |a|g-coin (1973Ag01) in |a decay. Note that 1987Ah05 interpreted this |g-ray peak as an escape line in their |a|g-coin spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Measured I|g(absolute)=30.0% {I7} (1986He06), 39.3% {I12} (1981Di14), 33% (1955Ma61), 29% (1955St04) 
M$from measured L1:L2:L3=0.55 {I14}:0.64 {I16}:1.00 (1960As02). 
E$From 1987Ah05 in {+229}Pa |a decay. Others: 40.12 {I5} (1981Di14), 40.0 {I10} (1955St04), 41 {I2} (1955Ma61) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from |a|g-coin (1973Ag01). This |g ray at 30.1 keV was interpreted by 1987Ah05 as an escape peak in their |a|g-coin spectrum Fig. 2. A general uncertainty of 0.2 keV for E|g was assigned by 1973Ag01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from level scheme, transition was not observed. Existence is inferred from observation of 40.09|g in coincidence with 5670|a populating the 64.70-keV level. 
$In level-scheme Fig. 4, 1973Ag01, I(|g+ce)(24.6)/I(|g+ce)(64.7)=10/45 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g(34.8|g)=1.04 {I9} (1987Ah05) was measured. I|g(34.8|g) deexciting the 64.7-keV level was determined by 1987Ah05 from |g spectrum in coincidence with the 5670|a populating the 64.70-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$obtained by 1987Ah05 from subtraction of the component from the 64.7 level determined from |a|g-coin gated with |a to the 64.7 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$ce data suggest |d=0.0070 {I13}. Value given here is estimated from RUL=1 for M2 transitions 
CC$from experimental ce data in {+231}Pa |a decay; suggests anomalous conversion coefficient for E1 transition, since from BrIcc code, theoretical value=3.59 {I7} for E1(+M2) with |d<0.0020 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
CC$BrIcc code cannot be used for this transition since its energy is within 1 keV of L{-3} electronic shell binding energy. The total conversion coefficient listed here is taken from the DDEP evaluation of Feb 2010 by A. Arinc, where it was calculated by T. Kibedi using the RAINE code, giving conversion coefficient of 5.06 {I7} for the L{-3} shell 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$energy from {+231}Pa |a decay. Placement and branching ratio from {+227}Ra decay only. In {+231}Pa decay, this |g ray is placed from 84.5 and 387.2 levels. Evaluators treat this transition as uncertain since not confirmed in {+231}Pa |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
$Deduced B(M2)(W.u.)>7.6 is inconsistent with RUL=1 for M2 transitions. The transition could be mixed with E3 or the level half-life is longer than reported by 1963Ab04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$doublet in {+227}Ra decay; intensity split based on its intensity in {+231}Pa decay, where the 398|g is a single line, placed from 425 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$placement from the 330 level is considered as questionable since not confirmed in {+231}Pa |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average. 1974De11 give absolute I(|g+ce)=52% {I8} 
$E|g=27.3 {I5} (1969La04), 27.3 {I2} (1970Le11), 27.35 {I2} (1970De19), 27.38 {I2} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=440 {I140} (1970Le11), 588 {I21} (1970De19,1974De11), 640 {I50} (1979Te02), 673 {I10} (1986BaYK). Value from 1970Le11 is not included in averaging 
M$from |a(L)exp=3.7 {I3}, ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=84 {I16}:138 {I20}:126 {I25} (1974De11). Other values: |a(L)exp=2.8 {I3}, ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(M4)+ce(M5) exp=9:5:10:6 (1960As02). ce(L):ce(M):ce(N) exp=31:10:1.7 (1961Ba42). Other: 1970De19. Experimental value of |a(L)exp=3.3 {I3} (from weighted average of 2.8 {I3} (1960As02), 3.6 {I4} (1961Ba42) and 3.7 {I3} (1974De11, 3.0 {I3} in 1970De11)) 
CC$from experimental value of |a(L)exp=3.3 {i3} (weighted average of 2.8 {i3} (1960As02), 3.6 {i4} (1961Ba42) and 3.7 {i3} (1974De11, 3.0 {i3} in 1970De11)). |a(theory, E1)=3.55, using BrIcc code. Anomalous E1 transition as suggested by experimental conversion data 
MR$estimated by evaluators from RUL for M2 transition. Others: 0.0070 {I13} from |a(L)exp=3.3 {I3} is too large to be consistent with RUL=1 for B(M2)(W.u.); +0.23 {I10} from |g|g(|q) (1982An02) is inconsistent with the experimental conversion coefficients as well as with RUL=1 for B(M2)(W.u.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=29.8 {I5} (1969La04), 29.9 {I2} (1970Le11), 29.95 {I2} (1970De19), 30.01 {I3} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=6.3 {I21} (1970Le11), 5.88 {I31} (1974De11, 5.8 {I6} in 1970De19), 6.5 {I5} (1979Te02), 5.63 {I30} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=203 {I20}; ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=82 {I15}:74 {I12}:47 {I9} (1974De11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
CC$BrIcc code cannot be used for this transition since its energy is within 1 keV of L{-3} electronic shell binding energy. The total conversion coefficient listed here is taken from the DDEP evaluation of Feb 2010 by A. Arinc, where it was calculated by T. Kibedi using the RAINE code, giving conversion coefficient of 5.06 {I7} for the L{-3} shell 
$E|g from 1970De19, I|g from 1986BaYK 
$E|g=16.5 {I1} (1970De19) 
$I|g=13.4 {I5} (1986BaYK) for a 16.56|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$nrm weighted average 
$E|g=46.1 {I5} (1969La04), 46.2 {I2} (1970Le11), 46.37 {I2} (1970De19), 46.32 {I2} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=8.1 {I25} (1970Le11), 11.1 {I6} (1974De11, 13.2 {I13} in 1970De19), 12.97 {I64} (1979Te02), 10.6 {I7} (1986BaYK). Uncertainty of 0.2 in 1970De19 seems a misprint, it is likely to be 2.0 
MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.11 {I10} from |g|g(|q) (1982An02) consistent with pure E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=43.9 {I5} (1969La04), 44.1 {I2} (1970Le11), 44.16 {I2} (1970De19), 44.13 {I2} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=2.8 {I9} (1970Le11), 3.41 {I26} (1974De11, 3.8 {I6} in 1970De19), 3.77 {I40} (1979Te02), 2.7 {I5} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=74.1 {I3} (1970Le11), 74.18 {I4} (1970De19), 74.08 {I6} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=1.3 {I6} (1970Le11), 1.41 {I13} (1974De11, 1.6 {I3} in 1970De19), 1.24 {I20} (1979Te02), 1.35 {I5} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$(nrm) weighted average 
$E|g=38.0 {I5} (1969La04), 38.1 {I2} (1970Le11), 38.20 {I2} (1970De19), 38.19 {I2} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=6.3 {I21} (1970Le11), 8.6 {I7} (1974De11, 9.4 {I11} in 1970De19), 9.4 {I5} (1979Te02), 8.59 {I33} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=70 {I12} (1970De19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=54.8 {I5} (1969La04), 54.5 {I2} (1970Le11), 54.61 {I2} (1970De19), 54.56 {I3} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=3.8 {I14} (1970Le11), 4.12 {I24} (1974De11, 5.1 {I6} in 1970De19), 4.33 {I35} (1979Te02), 4.44 {I32} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance at 330 and 387 levels, I|g=0.17 {I3} is assigned from 387 level and main intensity of 1.99 {I13} from the 84.5 level. Other: 1.58 {I16} from 84 level and 0.96 {I10} from 387 level (1979Te02) 
$E|g=57.0 {I2} (1970Le11), 57.19 {I3} (1970De19), 57.19 {I3} (1979Te02) for the doublet 
$I|g=1.9 {I7} (1970Le11), 1.94 {I13} (1974De11, 2.5 {I3} in 1970De19), 2.54 {I26} (1979Te02), 2.34 {I15} (1986BaYK) for the doublet. Weighted averaged intensity of the doublet is 2.16 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=25.3 {I5} (1969La04), 25.2 {I2} (1970Le11), 25.54 {I6} (1970De19), 25.36 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=|?19 (1970Le11), 7.6 {I12} (1974De11, |?6 in 1970De19), 6.9 {I10} (1979Te02), 16.5 {I9} (1986BaYK) for a 25.28|g. Values in 1970Le11 and 1986BaYK seem discrepant and not used in averaging; these values are also inconsistent in intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=35.6 {I5} (1969La04), 35.8 {I3} (1970Le11), 35.82 {I3} (1970De19), 35.86 {I4} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.9 {I3} (1970Le11), 1.15 {I10} (1974De11, 1.00 {I17} in 1970De19), 0.94 {I5} (1979Te02); |g not listed in 1986BaYK 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=63.3 {I5} (1969La04), 63.5 {I2} (1970Le11), 63.67 {I3} (1970De19), 63.60 {I4} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=1.9 {I7} (1970Le11), 2.82 {I24} (1974De11, 3.2 {I3} in 1970De19), 2.7 {I3} (1979Te02), 2.70 {I9} (1986BaYK) 
M$from |a(L)exp=76 {I13} (1970De19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=52.4 {I5} (1969La04), 52.6 {I2} (1970Le11), 52.74 {I2} (1970De19), 52.66 {I3} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=3.8 {I14} (1970Le11), 4.41 {I27} (1974De11, 5.4 {I6} in 1970De19), 4.85 {I34} (1979Te02), 5.4 {I6} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=96.7 {I2} (1970Le11), 96.88 {I3} (1970De19), 96.80 {I3} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=4.1 {I11} (1970Le11), 5.5 {I5} (1974De11, 5.6 {I7} in 1970De19), 5.62 {I28} (1979Te02), 5.00 {I7} (1986BaYK) 
M$from |a(L)exp=9.8 {I16} (1970De19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=59.4 {I5} (1969La04), 60.2 {I3} (1970Le11), 60.50 {I3} (1970De19), 60.47 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.19 {I13} (1970Le11), 0.36 {I4} (1974De11), 0.41 {I7} (1970De19), 0.3 {I1} (1979Te02), 0.29 {I5} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$nrm weighted average 
$E|g=77.1 {I5} (1969La04), 77.2 {I2} (1970Le11), 77.36 {I3} (1970De19), 77.30 {I4} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=2.5 {I7} (1970Le11), 3.53 {I27} (1974De11, 4.3 {I6} in 1970De19), 4.31 {I20} (1979Te02), 3.45 {I7} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$intensity difficult to obtain since the line is strongly mixed with K-x rays. Values here are from 1979Te02 
$E|g=102.5 {I4} (1970Le11), |?103 (1970De19), 102.6 {I5} (1979Te02); also mixed with Ac x rays 
$I|g=2.8 {I10} (1970Le11), 1.35 {I25} (1974De11, |?1 in 1970De19), <0.8 (1979Te02), 0.9 {I2} (1986BaYK); mixed with Ac x rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=71.9 {I1} (1970De19,1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.12 {I4} (1974De11, 0.12 {I6} in 1970De19), 0.1 {I1} (1979Te02), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=124.4 {I5} (1970Le11), 124.6 {I1} (1970De19), 124.56 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.13 {I7} (1970Le11), 0.29 {I12} (1970De19), 0.29 {I9} (1979Te02), 0.23 {I13} (1982An02), 0.259 {I24} (1986BaYK). Value from 1970Le11 is not included 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=100.5 {I5} (1970Le11), 100.92 {I4} (1970De19), 100.77 {I4} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.75 {I32} (1970Le11), 1.35 {I13} (1974De11, 2.0 {I3} in 1970De19), 1.66 {I25} (1979Te02), 1.38 {I4} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=72.5 {I1} (1970De19), 72.78 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.18 {I4} (1974De11, 0.24 {I12} in 1970De19), 0.2 {I1} (1979Te02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=144.4 {I5} (1970Le11), 144.5 {I1} (1970De19), 144.33 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.25 {I14} (1970Le11), 0.76 {I25} (1970De19), 0.64 {I30} (1979Te02), 0.70 {I6} (1982An02), 0.69 {I6} (1986BaYK). Value from 1970Le11 seems discrepant, and not included in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$only from |g|g-coin (1979Te02). Evaluators treat this |g as questionable due to implied high multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=198.7 {I6} (1970Le11), 199 {I1} (1970De19), 198.89 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.06 {I4} (1970Le11), 0.35 {I13} (1970De19), 0.23 {I10} (1979Te02), 0.28 {I5} (1982An02), 0.246 {I24} (1986BaYK). Value from 1970Le11 seems discrepant, and not included in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$NRM weighted average 
$E|g=243.0 {I5} (1969La04), 242.9 {I4} (1970Le11), 243.0 {I1} (1970De19), 243.15 {I9} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=5.7 (1969La04), 2.5 {I7} (1970Le11), 2.18 {I20} (1970De19), 2.97 {I24} (1979Te02), 2.51 {I43} (1982An02), 1.87 {I4} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.57 {I14} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=246.0 {I2} (1970De19), 246.05 {I9} (1979Te02) 
$I|g= <0.06 (1970De19), 0.7 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.70 {I20} (1982An02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=273.5 {I5} (1969La04), 273.2 {I3} (1970Le11), 273.08 {I9} (1970De19), 273.15 {I9} (1979Te02), 273.237 {I117} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=0.27 (1969La04), 4.4 {I11} (1970Le11), 3.65 {I22} (1970De19), 3.48 {I24} (1979Te02), 3.48 {I18} (1982An02), 3.50 {I5} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.58 {I8} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=258.4 {I1} (1970De19), 258.54 {I15} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.15 {I4} (1970De19), 0.15 {I5} (1979Te02), 0.13 {I4} (1982An02), 0.06 {I2} (1986BaYK). Value from 1983Ba77 is not included in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=245.3 {I5} (1970Le11), 245.4 {I1} (1970De19), 245.77 {I9} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.44 {I14} (1970Le11), 0.47 {I7} (1970De19), 0.48 {I12} (1979Te02), 0.44 {I8} (1982An02), 0.382 {I32} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=256.1 {I5} (1969La04), 255.9 {I3} (1970Le11), 255.78 {I7} (1970De19), 255.76 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=6.3 (1969La04), 8.1 {I16} (1970Le11), 6.4 {I5} (1970De19), 6.34 {I41} (1979Te02), 7.00 {I48} (1982An02), 6.41 {I6} (1986BaYK) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.098 {I10}, ce(K)/ce(L) exp=0.70 {I26} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$absolute I|g=0.01649 {I27} deduced from source strength (1986BaYK). Other: 0.0169 {I8} (1970De19) is in agreement 
$E|g=283.9 {I5} (1969La04), 283.7 {I3} (1970Le11), 283.56 {I6} (1970De19), 283.65 {I5} (1979Te02), 283.690 {I13} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=100.0 {I8} in 1986BaYK 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.04 {I1}, ce(K)/ce(L)(exp)=5.7 {I22} (1979Te02). 
MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.040 {I+10-14} from |g|g(|q) (1982An02); uncertainty of 0.01 listed in the adopted value in table 5 of 1982An02 is a misprint 
$(284|g)[19|g](27|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.034 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.019 {I21} or A{-2}=+0.025 {I18} when A{-4} is set to zero (1982An02) 
$(284|g)(47|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.051 {I65}, A{-4}=+0.026 {I68} or A{-2}=+0.056 {I47} when A{-4} is set to zero (1982An02) 
$Anisotropy=0.2% {i5} in |g(|q,H,t) (1982An02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=300.5 {I5} (1969La04), 300.1 {I2} (1970Le11), 299.94 {I6} (1970De19), 300.02 {I5} (1979Te02), 300.069 {I8} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=230 for 300.5+303.2 (1969La04), 144 {I22} (1970Le11), 144 {I10} (1970De19), 149.6 {I75} (1979Te02), 143.2 {I55} (1982An02), 146.3 {I18} (1986BaYK) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.34 {I1} (1979Te02) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) (1982An02). Other: 1.0 {I4} from |a(K)exp (1979Te02) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.34 {I1} (1979Te02). If E1+M2, |d=-0.12 {I7} gives |a(K)(theory)=0.06 {I4} in disagreement with measured value of 0.34 {I11} 
$Anisotropy=0.3% {i4} in |g(|q,H,t) (1982An02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$split intensity ratio of 302.7 doublet based on 138 {I20} from 302 level and 10.6 {I26} from 387 level taken from 1982An02 which is consistent with the data in {+227}Ra to {+227}Ac decay. 
$E|g=303.2 {I5} (1969La04), 302.7 {I2} (1970Le11), 302.52 {I6} (1970De19), 302.65 {I5} (1979Te02), 302.669 {I6} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=230 for 300.5+302.6 (1969La04), 144 {I22} (1970Le11), 148 {I10} (1970De19, 294 {I8} in 1974De11 for 300.1+302.7 doublet), 140 {I11} (1979Te02), 149 {I20} (1982An02), 149.6 {I18} (1986BaYK) for 302.7 doublet. Weighted average for the 302.7 doublet is 149.3 {I18}. 1979Te02 give split intensity of 100 {I10} from 330 level and 40 {I5} from 387 level; whereas 1982An02 give 138 {I20} from 330 level and 10.6 {I26} from 387 level. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.037 {I10} for the doublet (1979Te02). 
MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.20 {I1} from |g|g(|q), |g|g(|q,H,t) (1982An02). 
$(303|g)(27|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.064 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I14} or A{-2}=+0.067 {I12} when A{-4} is set to zero (1982An02) 
$Anisotropy=2.3% {i4} in |g(|q,t) (1982An02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=330.2 {I5} (1969La04), 330.0 {I2} (1970Le11), 329.89 {I6} (1970De19), 330.06 {I5} (1979Te02), 330.057 {I15} (1979Bo30). Uncertainty was doubled to 0.12 keV in the averaging procedure 
$I|g=34 (1969La04), 81 {I16} (1970Le11), 82.4 {I40} (1974De11, 82.4 {I48} in 1970De19 ), 81.9 {I65} (1979Te02), 82.1 {I12} (1982An02), 82.4 {I10} (1986BaYK) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.28 {I7}, K/L(exp)=5.3 {I24}. Other values: |a(K)exp=0.41 {I5}, K/L1(exp)=3.85 {I38} (1968Ha22). 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1982An02). Other: 0.66 {I22} from ce data, but not using K/L1 ratio from 1968Ha22 
$Anisotropy=2.8% {i6} in |g(|q,H,t) (1982An02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
TI$from |g-ray intensity balance at 354 level. 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. Others: I|g=0.7 {I3} (1979Te02), |?0.6 (1970De19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=327.2 {I4} (1970Le11), 327.02 {I10} (1970De19), 327.26 {I10} (1979Te02), 327.130 {I188} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=2.5 {I13} (1970Le11), 1.88 {I14} (1970De19), 2.27 {I28} (1979Te02), 2.19 {I44} (1982An02), 2.22 {I4} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=354.6 {I2} (1970Le11), 354.38 {I8} (1970De19), 354.57 {I8} (1979Te02), 354.474 {I75} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=6.00 {I42} (1970Le11), 6.3 {I15} (1970De19 ), 5.07 {I56} (1979Te02), 5.92 {I16} (1982An02), 5.81 {I8} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.09 {I2} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=260.2 {I5} (1969La04), 260.2 {I3} (1970Le11), 260.14 {I8} (1970De19), 260.23 {I8} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=19 (1969La04), 11.3 {I24} (1970Le11), 10.9 {I7} (1970De19), 11.39 {I57} (1979Te02), 11.03 {I14} (1982An02), 10.97 {I13} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.35 {I7}, ce(K)/ce(L) exp=2.9 {I12} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=277.7 {I5} (1969La04), 277.2 {I3} (1970Le11), 276.99 {I9} (1970De19), 277.10 {I9} (1979Te02), 277.322 {I13} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=0.065 (1969La04), 5.0 {I11} (1970Le11), 4.24 {I28} (1970De19), 3.88 {I25} (1979Te02), 4.59 {I58} (1982An02), 4.12 {I6} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.37 {I7} (1979Te02). |d(E2/M1)=1.2 {I+3-2} is also consistent with |a(K)exp; but |DJ|p requires E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=313.0 {I5} (1969La04), 312.9 {I3} (1970Le11), 312.88 {I8} (1970De19), 312.94 {I5} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=4.1 (1969La04), 6.9 {I16} (1970Le11), 6.0 {I5} (1970De19), 7.05 {I56} (1979Te02), 5.93 {I17} (1982An02), 5.97 {I7} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.22 {I8}. Measured ce(K)/ce(L) exp=1.1 {I5} (1979Te02) is not in good agreement with |d=1.5 {I+9-5} which gives K/L(theory)=3.1 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=341.0 {I5} (1969La04), 340.8 {I2} (1970Le11), 340.61 {I7} (1970De19), 340.77 {I6} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=3.7 (1969La04), 10.0 {I28} (1970Le11), 10.5 {I7} (1970De19), 10.9 {I13} (1979Te02), 10.62 {I16} (1982An02), 10.80 {I13} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.084 {I20} (1979Te02). Measured ce(K)/ce(L) exp=0.76 {I30} is inconsistent with |d=0.23 {I4} which gives K/L(theory)=4.0 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=356.6 {I5} (1969La04), 357.2 {I2} (1970Le11), 356.96 {I7} (1970De19), 357.21 {I6} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=9.4 {I22} (1970Le11), 10.9 {I7} (1970De19), 9.67 {I82} (1979Te02), 10.35 {I46} (1982An02), 10.14 {I12} (1986BaYK) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.36 {I10} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average 
$E|g=351.4 {I1} (1970De19), 351.6 {I1} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.22 {I3} (1970De19), 0.15 {I6} (1979Te02), 0.44 {I7} (1982An02), 0.102 {I4} (1986BaYK). Discrepant data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average 
$E|g=379.5 {I5} (1969La04), 379.2 {I3} (1970Le11), 379.09 {I8} (1970De19), 379.41 {I6} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.65 (1969La04), 2.5 {I10} (1970Le11), 3.12 {I26} (1970De19), 2.89 {I23} (1979Te02), 2.96 {I10} (1982An02), 3.03 {I5} (1986BaYK). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.27 {I10}; measured ce(K)/ce(L) exp=4.6 {I24} (1979Te02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=395.7 {I4} (1970Le11), 395.5 {I1} (1970De19), 395.49 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.06 {I3} (1970Le11), 0.165 {I19} (1970De19), 0.11 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.12 {I2} (1982An02), 0.148 {I11} (1986BaYK). Value from 1970Le11 not used in averaging 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=398.4 {I5} (1969La04), 398.1 {I3} (1970Le11), 398.10 {I8} (1970De19), 398.19 {I9} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.075 (1969La04), 0.44 {I20} (1970Le11), 0.59 {I6} (1970De19), 0.49 {I9} (1979Te02), 0.49 {I12} (1982An02), 0.574 {I15} (1986BaYK). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=408.1 {I5} (1969La04), 407.7 {I3} (1970Le11), 407.71 {I6} (1970De19), 407.80 {I5} (1979Te02), 407.829 {I28} (1979Bo30) 
$I|g=0.34 for 408.1+410.5 (1969La04), 1.3 {I7} (1970Le11), 2.29 {I20} (1970De19), 2.13 {I18} (1979Te02), 2.07 {I16} (1982An02), 2.156 {I30} (1986BaYK). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.4 {I1}; measured ce(K)/ce(L) exp=7.5 {I23} (1979Te02); deduced |d(E2/M1)=0.0 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=434.9 {I8} (1970Le11), 435.1 {I1} (1970De19), 435.0 {I1} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.13 {I6} (1970Le11), 0.212 {I25} (1970De19), 0.12 {I3} (1979Te02), 0.18 {I1} (1982An02), 0.177 {I10} (1986BaYK). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average 
$E|g=50.98 {I5} (1970De19), 50.68 {I6} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.12 {I3} (1974De11, 0.09 {I4} in 1970De19), 0.3 {I1} (1979Te02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=364.2 {I5} (1969La04), 363.9 {I4} (1970Le11), 363.74 {I10} (1970De19), 363.93 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.38 {I21} (1970Le11), 0.47 {I5} (1970De19), 0.42 {I15} (1979Te02), 0.45 {I5} (1982An02), 0.488 {I14} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=392.5 {I5} (1969La04), 391.7 {I3} (1970Le11), 391.5 {I1} (1970De19), 391.67 {I9} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.70 (1969La04), 0.31 {I13} (1970Le11), 0.43 {I5} (1970De19), 0.52 {I8} (1979Te02), 0.35 {I5} (1982An02), 0.408 {I12} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=410.5 {I5} (1969La04), 410.3 {I10} (1970Le11), 410.5 {I1} (1970De19), 410.1 {I1} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.06 {I3} (1970Le11), 0.118 {I12} (1970De19), 0.19 {I4} (1979Te02), 0.21 {I6} (1982An02), 0.099 {I11} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=437.9 {I5} (1969La04), 437.9 {I8} (1970Le11), 437.9 {I1} (1970De19), 438.10 {I9} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.048 (1969La04), 0.25 {I14} (1970Le11), 0.259 {I26} (1970De19), 0.20 {I6} (1979Te02), 0.28 {I3} (1982An02), 0.283 {I16} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average 
$E|g=358.6 {I4} (1970Le11), 359.25 {I10} (1970De19), 359.57 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.38 {I21} (1970Le11), 0.57 {I6} (1970De19), 0.41 {I18} (1979Te02), 0.42 {I8} (1982An02), 0.512 {I15} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=384.8 {I3} (1970Le11), 384.7 {I1} (1970De19), 384.7 {I1} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.13 {I7} (1970Le11), 0.259 {I26} (1970De19), 0.18 {I4} (1979Te02), 0.18 {I5} (1982An02), 0.221 {I12} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=501 {I1} (1970Le11), 501.6 {I5} (1970De19), 501.0 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.013 (1970Le11), 0.035 {I13} (1970De19), 0.05 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.07 {I7} (1982An02), 0.053 {I11} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=491 {I2} (1970Le11), 491.0 {I6} (1970De19), 491.0 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.006 (1970Le11), 0.029 (1970De19), <0.04 (1979Te02), 0.04 {I2} (1982An02), 0.023 {I6} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=512.2 {I5} (1969La04), 510 {I1} (1970Le11), 509 {I1} (1970De19), 510.0 {I10} (1979Te02). Value from 1969La04 is not used in averaging 
$I|g=0.031 (1970Le11), 0.018 {I7} (1970De19), 0.05 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.10 {I4} (1982An02). Other: <0.02 (1969La04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=487.2 {I5} (1969La04), 486.6 {I10} (1970Le11), 486.7 {I3} (1970De19), 486.8 {I10} (1979Te02), 486.827 {I23} (1979Bo30). 
$I|g=0.063 {I31} (1970Le11), 0.112 {I24} (1970De19), 0.15 {I5} (1979Te02), 0.10 (1982An02), 0.091 {I9} (1986BaYK). Other: <0.02 (1969La04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. level-energy difference=514.6; E|g not used in the fitting procedure 
$E|g=516.2 {I5} (1969La04), 516 {I1} (1970Le11), 516.2 {I6} (1970De19), 516.1 {I10} (1979Te02). 
$I|g=0.050 (1970Le11), 0.082 {I20} (1970De19), 0.06 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.06 {I2} (1982An02), 0.093 {I9} (1986BaYK). Other: <0.02 (1969La04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=535 {I1} (1970Le11), 535.3 {I7} (1970De19), 536.6 {I10} (1979Te02). 1986BaYK give two |g rays near this energy: 535.3 with I|g=0.038 {I7} and 536.00 with I|g=0.020 {I7}, the latter is questionable 
$I|g=0.031 (1970Le11), 0.029 {I13} (1970De19), 0.05 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.04 {I2} (1982An02), 0.038 {I7} for 535.3|g (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=546 {I1} (1970Le11), 546.6 {I7} (1970De19), 546.6 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.025 (1970Le11), 0.035 {I13} (1970De19), 0.04 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.06 {I2} (1982An02), 0.056 {I8} (1986BaYK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=571 {I2} (1970Le11), 572.1 {I8} (1970De19), 571.0 {I10} (1979Te02) 
$I|g=0.019 (1970Le11), 0.029 {I13} (1970De19), 0.04 {I2} (1979Te02), 0.02 {I2} (1982An02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$Due to Coriolis mixing of i{-13/2} |n-orbitals. Data also consistent with M1+E2 with |d|?0.03, but not consistent with pure E2 or higher multipolarities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$The only |g-ray unambiguously assigned from |g|g due to large overleaping with {+228}Th X-rays (1995So11). Justified by the Coriolis mixing of K{+|p}=0{++} and 1{++} bands. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Observed in both electron and |g spectra 
CC from I(|g+ce) and I|g; theory: |a(E1)=6.86, |a(M2)=2.09|*10{+5}, |a(E1+M2)=1.0|*10{+5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$2008Bo29 placed 396.92|g from the 415 level only in Tables 1 and 2, but in Fig. 1 and Table 4, placement was also shown from 471 level. The latter placement appears incorrect, as implied multipolarity of E1 for this placement is inconsistent with M1 from |a(K) exp data in authors' Table 2. However, possibility of a small component of the 396.9 |g ray from the 471.6 level is not precluded. Evaluators assign the intensity given in 2008Bo29 to the placement from 415 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$440.6 from ({+209}Bi,{+210}Po) only. As values in ({+209}Bi,{+210}Po) (2002AbZV) are consistently lower as compared to those in ({+136}Xe,{+137}Cs) (1999Br17), the given E|g may be lower by |?4 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=1.6 {I5} from |a(L1+L2)exp, 2.0 {I9} from |a(M)exp and >2.0 from |a(N)exp 
$All experimental conversion coefficients deduced from (ce)|g and |g|g coin with 54.29|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Experimental conversion coefficient deduced from (ce)|g and |g|g coin with 54.29|g gives mult=M1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Evaluators assume that I|g<7, relative to 1000 for 54.29|g quoted in 2008Bo29 is the transition intensity, not the photon intensity, as otherwise, with large conversion coefficient for the 21.0 transition, there will be intensity balance problems at the 245.7 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E|g=204.98 {I3}, I|g=100 {I6} (1985Hi02) 
$ For experimental conversion coefficients, contribution from ce(K) and ce(L1+L2) of 204.79|g subtracted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=0.4 {I+14-4} from ce data 
RI$contributions from a 397.3-keV |g in Ra decay and 396.9-keV |g from Th subtracted 
$2008Bo29 placed 396.92|g from the 415 level only in Tables 1 and 2, but in Fig. 1 and Table 4, placement was also shown from 471 level. The latter placement appears incorrect, as implied multipolarity of E1 for this placement is inconsistent with M1 from |a(K) exp data in authors' Table 2. However, possibility of a small component of the 396.9 |g ray from the 471.6 level is not precluded. Evaluators assign the intensity given in 2008Bo29 to the placement from 415 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=0.0 {I+6-0} from ce data 
$Experimental conversion coefficient deduced from (ce)|g- and |g|g-coin with 54.29|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=381.76, I|g=3.0 in Fig. 5 of 2008Bo29 is incorrect 
$In Fig. 5 of 2008Bo29, this |g is also shown from 449 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$from ce measurements in 1989Dr02 (see {+217}Th IT decay (141 ns) dataset); also systematics of N=127 isotones 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E$from 2005Ku31. Other: 673.8 (1989Dr02). 
M$from |a(K)exp and K/L ratio; also systematics of N=127 isotones 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I(ce)=16 {I5} (1985Bo32) 
M$E2 or M2 from measured K/L ratio; M2 is highly unlikely as there is no evidence for long lifetime of 689.6 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g ray is considered by evaluator as corresponding to 388.9 {I6} |g from 1078.0, (3-) level in 2020Od01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g ray is considered by evaluator as corresponding to 173.1 {I4} |g from 2272.6, (11-) level in 2020Od01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g ray is considered by evaluator as corresponding to 413.7 {I4} |g from 2686.3, (13-) level in 2020Od01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R(|q)=0.93 {I3} 
M$from R(|q) and intensity balance arguments, from which mult=M1, E2 or M1+E2 is not allowed. In addition, no conversion line was seen in ce data of 1985Bo32 for this strong transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R(|q)=0.85 {I10} 
M$from R(|q) and intensity balance arguments, from which mult=M1, E2 or M1+E2 is unlikely. In addition, a 16+ level is reproduce in shell-model calculations 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Levels, where it is taken from 2006Re15. Authors in 2014Lo10 measured 386.7 {I18}, where large uncertainty is due to poor statistics 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Positive A{-2} is inconsistent with |DJ=1, E1 for 159.2|g; sign of A{-2} is possibly a misprint in table I of 2014Re12. (Compiler's comment) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$lower limit due to the presence of an unresolved doublet 
$A{-2} and A{-4} values obtained from gate on 250.9|g are approximate 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.20 {I7} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.21 {I10} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=183.2, I(|g+ce)=140 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=183.3, I(|g+ce)=100 (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=183 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=183.2, I(|g+ce)=100 (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.28 {I5} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.24 {I13} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=256.6, I(|g+ce)=125 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=256.5, I(|g+ce)=106 {I8} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=257 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=256.5, I(|g+ce)=118.0 {I40} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.10 {I6} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.07 {I9} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=211.4, I(|g+ce)=66 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=211.3, I(|g+ce)=39 {I3} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=211 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=211.2, I(|g+ce)=64.4 {I50} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.92 {I9} (1983Wa20) 
M$|DJ=1, dipole from |g(|q); (E1) from transition-intensity balance at the 749 level, and interband transition 
$E|g=99.1, I|g=30 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=34 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=99.1, I(|g+ce)=17 {I2} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=99 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=99.0, I(|g+ce)=33.0 {I40} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.32 {I10} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.40 {I14} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=310.5, I|g=44 {I5}, I(|g+ce)=51 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=310.2, I(|g+ce)=35 {I3} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=311 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=310.2, I(|g+ce)=45.7 {I34} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.83 {I6} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.01 {I8} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=173.5, I|g=64 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=65 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=174 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=173.3, I(|g+ce)=67.5 {I41} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.57 {I15} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=272.8, I|g=38.3, I(|g+ce)|?10 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=272.5, I(|g+ce)=9 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=273 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=272.5, I(|g+ce)=5.9 {I8} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.0 {I8} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.00 {I10} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=170.5, I|g=44 {I6}, I(|g+ce)=45 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=170.3, I(|g+ce)=33 {I3} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=171 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=170.4, I(|g+ce)=58.5 {I32} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.35 {30} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.10 {I11} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=343.7, I|g=23 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=26 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=343.5, I(|g+ce)=9 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=344 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=343.5, I(|g+ce)=15.6 {I30} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp for 161.1|g+161.2|g 
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.90 {I6} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.03 {I10} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=161.3, I|g=40 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=40 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=161.5, I(|g+ce)=33, 53 {I4} for doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=161 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=161.2, I(|g+ce)=49.1 {I29} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.55 {I14} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=332.0, I|g=21 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=24 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=331.8, I(|g+ce)=16 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=332 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=331.8, I(|g+ce)=15.7 {I21} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.90 {I10} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=0.92 {I6} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=207.0, I|g=45 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=45 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=206.4, I(|g+ce)=31 {I3} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=207 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=206.4, I(|g+ce)=47.1 {I23} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp could be for 368.1|g+367.8|g 
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=1.50 {I20} (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=368, I|g=9 {I5}, I(|g+ce)=10 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=367.9, I(|g+ce)=7, 16 {I} for doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=368 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=367.6, I(|g+ce)=8.0 {I25} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp for 161.1|g+161.2|g 
$E|g=161, I|g=30 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=30 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=160.9, I(|g+ce)=20, 53 {I4} for doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=161 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=160.9, I(|g+ce)=28.4 {I17} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp could be for 368.1|g+367.8|g 
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.52 {I17} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=368.3, I|g=18 {I5}, I(|g+ce)=20 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=367.3, I(|g+ce)=9, 16 {I} for doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=368 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=367.3, I(|g+ce)=12.1 {I30} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.83 {I11} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=0.99 {I10} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=228.9, I|g=23 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=23 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=228.6, I(|g+ce)=20 {I2} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=229 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=228.5, I(|g+ce)=23.3 {I11} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.49 {I24} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=390, I|g=6 {I3}, I(|g+ce)|?6 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=389.5, I(|g+ce)=9 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=390 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=389.4, I(|g+ce)=6.1 {I7} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=0.80 {I3} (1988ScZF) 
M$|DJ=1, dipole from |g(|q); (E1) from transition-intensity balance considerations at the 749 level, and interband transition 
$E|g=164.7, I|g=15 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=15 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=164.7, I(|g+ce)=15 {I2} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=165 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=164.6, I(|g+ce)=22.2 {I23} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.52 {I15} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=393.2, I|g=13 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=14 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=393.6, I(|g+ce)=7, 16 {I} for doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=393 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=392.9, I(|g+ce)=10.4 {I12} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.87 {I15} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.03 {I13} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=244.5, I|g=14 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=14 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=244.6, I(|g+ce)=15 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=245 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=244.3, I(|g+ce)=16.4 {I13} (1988ScZF, doublet) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.83 {I17} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=409.2, I|g=9 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=10 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=409.2, I(|g+ce)=4 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=409 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=409.0, I(|g+ce)=2.6 {I6} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=172.2, I|g=18 {I4}, I(|g+ce)=18 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=172.3, I(|g+ce)=11, 54 {I5} for doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=172 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=172.0, I(|g+ce)=14.3 {I9} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.64 {I13} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=416.7, I|g=17 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=18 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=416.9, I(|g+ce)=6 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=417 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=416.4, I(|g+ce)=10.6 {I17} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=257, I|g=10 {I3}, I(|g+ce)|?10 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=257 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=256.1, I(|g+ce)=10.0 {I10} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.62 {I16} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=429, I|g=8 {I3}, I(|g+ce)|?8 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=429.1, I(|g+ce)=8 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=429 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=428.1, I(|g+ce)=5.9 {I9} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g(28|')/I|g(90|')=0.90 {I15} (1983Wa20); I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=0.96 {I17} (1988ScZF) 
M$|DJ=1, dipole from |g(|q); (E1) from transition-intensity balance at the 749 level, and interband transition 
$E|g=185.4, I|g=11 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=11 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=185 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=185.0, I(|g+ce)=7.8 {I9} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.00 {I15} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=441, I|g=10 {I3}, I(|g+ce)=11 (1983Wa20) 
$E|g=441.0, I(|g+ce)=11 {I1}, possible doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=441 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=441.1, I(|g+ce)=6.6 {I8} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=0.60 {I20} (1988ScZF) 
M$from |g(|q) and |DJ|p. 
$E|g=260 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=260.2, I(|g+ce)=8.1 {I23} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=0.65 {I19} (1988ScZF); |g(|q) inconsistent with expected |DJ=2, quadrupole. 
$E|g=441.0, I(|g+ce)=11 {I1}, possible doublet (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=445 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=445.7, I(|g+ce)=2.3 {I9} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.61 {I15} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=462 (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=467.7, I(|g+ce)=2.6 {I4} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.20 {I19} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=463.9, I(|g+ce)=4 {I1} (1985Bo32) 
$E|g=462.5, I(|g+ce)=2.3 {I3} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.17 {I25} (1988ScZF); |g(|q) not quite consistent |DJ=1, dipole 
$E|g=239.2, I(|g+ce)=3.6 {I10} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g(154|')/I|g(85|')=1.41 {I20} (1988ScZF) 
$E|g=(481) (1987KoZF) 
$E|g=494.8, I(|g+ce)=1.1 {I3} (1988ScZF) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=14 {I6}, from I(|g+ce)=18 {I8} for {+233}Th and {+232}Th, and |a=0.331 (1988Da15) 
$R(ADO)=1.26 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=10.7 {I25}, from I(|g+ce)=13 {I3} for {+233}Th and {+232}Th, and |a=0.220 (1988Da15) 
$R(ADO)=1.31 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g=38 {I9}, from I(|g+ce)=42 {I10} for {+222}Th and {+223}Th, and |a=0.117 (1988Da15) 
$R(ADO)=0.74 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$R(ADO)=0.65 {I10}. Uncertainty of 0.01 in authors' Table I seems a misprint, considering the uncertainties for other R(ADO) values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g(176)/I|g(340)=2.8 {I3} (1993Ac02) 
E$from 1986Sc18. E|g=399.9 in figure 13 of 1993Ac02 is a misprint . 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from Adopted Gammas. E|g=93 (1961Ru06) 
TI from I|a imbalance at 93 level 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a 
CC |a is for E|g=98.1 keV, the adopted energy for this |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Ice(L3)=32 {I3}, L3/M=32 {I3}/23 {I3} (1974Va28); L12:L3:M:N=117 {I20}:102 {I15}:93 {I15}:24 {I5} (1967LoZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M from {+230}U |a decay; this transition was not observed in {+226}Ac decay. 
RI obtained by the evaluator from intensity balance at the 226-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from {+230}U |a decay; this transition was not observed in {+226}Ac decay. 
RI calculated by the evaluator from intensity balance at the 307-keV level (|b{+-} feeding, if any, has been neglected) and I|g(81|g)/I|g(235|g)=4.8 {I11}/117 {I8}, as measured in {+230}U decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from {+230}U decay; this transition was not observed in the {+226}Ac decay 
RI calculated by the evaluator. See comment for I|g(81.0|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI absolute intensity was determined to be I|g=0.60% {I4} by 1969Pe17 (|a|g) and I|g=0.59% {I9} by 1956As38 (renormalized by 1961Ru06). 
M |a(72|g)=53 {I3} was deduced by 1969Pe17 from |a|g data. See also {+226}Ac |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$questionable placement as transition would require M3 or E4 multipolarities based on adopted J|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$assigned as E1 by 1998Ma83 based on strength of 178.7 |g rays can the absence of corresponding ce in spectra gated by the 106.0-keV transition. 2002Ha30 argue for E2 multipolarity as the M and N conversion electrons from the 162.0-keV transition mask the L2 and L3 ce lines from the 178.7-keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$13/2+ to 11/2- transition shown in table IV of 2002Ha30 is a misprint. It should be 13/2- to 11/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$17/2+ to 15/2- transition shown in table IV of 2002Ha30 is a misprint. It should be 17/2- to 15/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$17/2+ to 13/2+ transition shown in table IV of 2002Ha30 is a misprint. It should be 17/2- to 13/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(N):ce(O)exp=1425:1545:720:200 (1959No41); ce ratios are consistent with E2 multipolarity, however, an M1 admixture cannot be ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from ce(M2)/ce(M1)exp=0.39 {I4}, ce(M3)/ce(M1)exp=0.24 {I3} (1997Mu08). 
M$from ce(M1)+ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(N)exp=50:8:15 (1959No41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement in level scheme is inconsistent with |a-|g coin results from {+231}U |a decay (1997Mu08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$questionable placement as the 294.6|g feeds a questionable 252.4-keV level which is not adopted by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance, and I|a=27.9 to 9.3 level. 
E$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas 
RI$deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity balance, and I|a=42.3 to 24.4 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from an upper limit on the L-conversion electron intensity (1997Mu08). 
E$other: unplaced 64.3 transition in 1994Li12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: unplaced 67.0 transition in 1994Li12. 
$1995Li04 proposed a 67.0-keV level (J|p=(1/2-)), which is populated mostly from a 142-keV level and deexcited by a 67.0-keV |g ray. The 142-keV level has been proven to be inconsistent with |a-|g coin data of 1997Mu08. The existence of the 67.0-keV level is therefore uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |g-ray transition intensity balance and comparison with measured K| x ray intensity (1997Mu08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g not resolved from the 623.27|g from 1645 level in {+228}Pa decay, I(doublet)=23 {I3}. Not reported in {+228}Ac decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ {+228}Ac decay reports unresolved doublets around 924.03 keV without uncertainty. {+228}Pa decay resolves the doublets to 924.0 {I1}, 924.5 {I1}, and 924.6 {I1}. There is also disagreement in the reported relative intensities. Since level decay in {+228}Pa is more complete than {+228}Ac decay, the evaluator adopts the |g-rays reported in {+228}Pa decay with their relative intensities. 


