# LEVEL

level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level in (n,|g) is possibly different from that in particle-transfer reactions since 5/2,7/2- level is not expected to Be populated in (n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(-),3/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g's to 1/2- and 5/2-; log| {Ift}=6.1 from 1/2+; L(d,t)=L(d,p)=(3,1) 
E$probable doublet in (d,t) and (d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 2.49 ns {I3} (1971Si20), 2.38 ns {I7} (1967Ba27), 2.37 ns {I7} (1966Ra28), 2.42 ns {I15} (1963Li08), 2.35 ns {I20} (1952Be26). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 71 ps {I5} (1974Do01), 70 ps {I15} (1972Si42), 71 ps {I7} (1966Ra28), 66 ps {I6} (1963Li08,1964Li12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from isomer produced in (|g,|g') excitation (2001Li17). Others: 42.6 min {I2} (1969Kl06), 39.7 min {I6} (1968Bo28), 43.0 min {I5} (1965Sm02), 42 min {I1} (1955Bo29), 44.4 min {I5} (1948Mo33), 43 min {I1} (1948Ho37,1937Mc04, 1937He04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$Isomer shift=+0.27 keV {I17} (1983Gu02) from x rays, +0.26 keV {I15} (1974Ba77) from |g's. 
$Other: B(E2)=0.362 {I10}, Q=+0.95 {I6} (1979Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$B(E2)(from 158, 5/2- level)=0.060 {I10} (1983Gu02) 
$Isomer shift=-0.56 keV {I38} (1983Gu02) from x rays; +0.41 keV {I12} (1974Ba77) from |g's. See 1983Gu02 for discussion of discrepancy. 
$Other: B(E2)=0.216 {I10}, Q=+0.62 {I15} (1979Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
g=+0.352 {I13} from 1977Kr11 I|g(|q,T{-1/2},h). 
T$weighted average of 2.32 ns {I8} (1961Gr29,1962Ba37), 2.53 ns {I15} (1961Re12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$S(n)+E(n), S(n)=6663.9 {I3} (2003Au03), E(n)=23.1 eV {I1}. 1975Lo03 used S(n)=6665.3 for level-energy determination 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$S(n)+E(n), S(n)=6663.9 {I3} (2003Au03), E(n)=89.9 eV {I2}. 1975Lo03 used S(n)=6665.3 for level-energy determination 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$value is probably too low because of difficulties in measuring a level of this half-life with a transient field. 
T$from 'adopted levels' 
$B(E2)=0.375 {I17} (given by 1971Ka03) renormalized to 0.363 {I7}, using 'adopted' T{-1/2}(158 level)=2.45 ns {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$367.942|g E2 to 0+; L(d,d')=2 
T$From Coulomb excitation, using B(E2)|^=0.853 {I7} (1980Sp05). Other: 44 ps {I3} from |g|g(|Dt) in 2019Ol05 
BE2$Others: 0.853 {I15} in 1979Bo16, 0.95 {I11} in 1970Ka09 and 0.855 in 1981Gu07 
MOME2$Recommended by 2021StZZ, based on +1.11 {I11} and +0.96 {I11} in 1979Bo16. Other: +1.07 {I19} in 1980Sp05 
MOMM1$Recommended by 2020StZV based on g=+0.326 {I26} in 1995Br34 (transient field integral perturbed angular correlations). Others: g=0.40 {I7} (1974Do01, but revised in 1986Ko02), g=0.31 {I8} (1970Ka09, but revised in 1986Ko02), g=0.29 {I6} in 1986Ko02, normalized to g=0.52 for 2+ state in {+198}Hg 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$579.300|g E2 to 2+; L(d,d')=4 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.477 {I21}. Other: 6 ps {I3} from |g|g(|Dt) in 2019Ol05 
BE2$Weighted average of 0.466 {I47} (1979Bo16) and 0.479 {I23} (1981Gu07) 
MOMM1$Recommended by 2021StZZ based on g=+0.254 {I43} in 1995Br34 (transient field integral perturbed angular correlations). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1254.14|g E2 to 0+, 306.863|g to 4+; L(d,d')=2 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.0080 {I15} (1979Bo16). Other: 8 ps {I6} from |g|g(|Dt) in 2019Ol05 
BE2$Other: B(E2)(2+ to 2+)=0.015 {I3} (1979Bo16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J$From 711.70|g M1(+E2) to 4+, 1291.1|g M1(+E2) to 2+ and 1610.9|g from 1+. However, J|p=4+ from p'(|q) in {+200}Hg(p,p') and L(d,d')=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$759.5|g E2 to 4+; p'(|q) in {+200}Hg(p,p'); L(d,d')=2 from J|p=4+; band structure 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.46 {I4} in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
J$1604.50|g M1+E2 to 2+, 313.23|g to 3+, 341.375|g to 1+; direct beta feeding in {+200}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=(1-)) favors J=1,2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
J$1975.8|g M1(+E2) to 2+; 498.81|g to 3+; Non observation in res n-capture (J|p=0- and 1-) favors J=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$2609|g (E3) to 0+; p'(|q) in {+200}Hg(p,p'); L(d,d')=3 
T$Using B(E3)|^=0.41 {I4} and by assuming that E|g=2609 keV {I3} is the only depopulating transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$1042.4|g M1 to 3+; 1754.6|g to 4+, 331.3|g to 1+; feeding from n-capture (J|p=1-) resonance state; L(d,d')=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$546.1|g (M1) to 2+; 903.5|g to 3+; direct feeding by E1 primary 5150.1|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$851.36|g M1+E2 to 2+, 1408.0|g E2+M1 to 1+, 1121.4|g (M1) to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 5050.3|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1322.4|g M1 to 2+, 1538.2|g to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4974.7|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1503.2|g E2(+M1) to 1+, 3074.2|g (M1) to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4954.2|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1476.6|g M1+E2 to 1+, 3185.8|g (M1) to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4842.4|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$2901.3|g E2(+M1) to 2+, 3269.4|g (M1) to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4758.9|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1557.7|g M1(+E2) to 2+, 3288.9|g (M1) to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4739.2|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1163.5|g M1+E2 to 1+, 1838.1|g to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4675.5|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
J$1811.2|g to 2+, 2432.7|g to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4575.4|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$2462.6|g to 0+; 901.69|g to 1-; direct feeding by primary E1 4537.8|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
J$1163.5|g (M1+E2) to (1,2)+, 1879.3|g to 3+, 2139.7|g to 0+; direct feeding by primary E1 4372.3|g in {+199}Hg(n,|g)E=th:primary 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$Others: 0.853 {I15} in 1979Bo16, 0.95 {I11} in 1970Ka09 and 0.855 in 1981Gu07 
MOME2$Weighted average of +1.07 {I19} in 1980Sp05 and +1.11 {I11} in 1979Bo16 
MOMM1$From g=+0.326 {I26} in 1995Br34. Others: g=0.40 {I7} (1974Do01, but value revised in 1986Ko02), g=0.31 {I8} (1970Ka09, but value revised in 1986Ko02), g=0.29 {I6} in 1986Ko02, normalized to g(2+)=0.52 in {+198}Hg 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$Weighted average of 0.466 {I47} (1979Bo16) and 0.479 {I23} (1981Gu07) 
MOMM1$From g=+0.254 {I43} in 1995Br34 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.484 {I49} 
$d|s/d|W=0.982 mb/sr {I99} at 5|', 0.0731 mb/sr {I75} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.104 {I11} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0713 mb/sr {I74} at 5|', 0.208 mb/sr {I21} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0043 {I6} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0123 mb/sr {I15} at 5|', 0.0079 mb/sr {I10} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0711 {I73} 
$d|s/d|W=0.122 mb/sr {I13} at 5|', 0.0256 mb/sr {I28} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0261 {I28} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0137 mb/sr {I16} at 5|', 0.0485 mb/sr {I51} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0001 {I1} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0005 mb/sr {I2} at 5|', 0.0001 mb/sr {I1} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0062 {I8} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0202 mb/sr {I22} at 5|', 0.0019 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0695 {I71} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0483 mb/sr {I50} at 5|', 0.142 mb/sr {I14} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0010 {I2} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0022 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0014 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.100 {I10} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0972 mb/sr {I99} at 5|', 0.0863 mb/sr {I87} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0082 {I10} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0019 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0060 mb/sr {I7} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0017 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0069 mb/sr {I9} at 5|', 0.0035 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0364 {I39} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0166 mb/sr {I19} at 5|', 0.0352 mb/sr {I37} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0050 {I10} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0218 mb/sr {I24} at 5|', 0.0027 mb/sr {I8} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0026 {I4} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0018 mb/sr {I5} at 5|', 0.0068 mb/sr {I8} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0016 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0010 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0014 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0012 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0012 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0017 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0194 {I21} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0162 mb/sr {I18} at 5|', 0.0165 mb/sr {I17} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0007 {I2} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0011 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0011 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0103 {I12} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0098 mb/sr {I12} at 5|', 0.0085 mb/sr {I9} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0194 {I21} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0099 mb/sr {I12} at 5|', 0.0147 mb/sr {I16} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0009 {I2} 
J$ previous 0+ assignment is inconsistent with |s(5|')/|s(17.5|') ratio in and lack of forward peaking for L=0 transfer (2013Be21) 
$d|s/d|W=0.0011 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0019 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0008 {I2} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0010 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0013 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0072 {I9} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0026 mb/sr {I5} at 5|', 0.0047 mb/sr {I6} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0068 {I9} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0091 mb/sr {I11} at 5|', 0.0094 mb/sr {I10} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0006 {I2} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0016 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0020 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0030 {I5} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0011 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0015 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0024 {I4} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0082 mb/sr {I10} at 5|', 0.0016 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0045 {I6} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0077 mb/sr {I10} at 5|', 0.0048 mb/sr {I6} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0101 {I12} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0108 mb/sr {I13} at 5|', 0.0180 mb/sr {I19} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0066 {I8} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0036 mb/sr {I6} at 5|', 0.0045 mb/sr {I6} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0038 {I5} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0009 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0026 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0038 {I5} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0030 mb/sr {I5} at 5|', 0.0034 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0048 {I6} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0038 mb/sr {I6} at 5|', 0.0107 mb/sr {I12} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0187 {I20} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0112 mb/sr {I13} at 5|', 0.0134 mb/sr {I14} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0274 {I29} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0218 mb/sr {I24} at 5|', 0.0633 mb/sr {I64} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0096 {I11} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0020 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0047 mb/sr {I6} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0009 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0005 mb/sr {I2} at 5|', 0.0008 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0072 {I9} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0163 mb/sr {I19} at 5|', 0.0037 mb/sr {I5} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0076 {I10} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0051 mb/sr {I9} at 5|', 0.0055 mb/sr {I7} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0040 {I7} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0017 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0036 mb/sr {I5} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0003 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0014 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0007 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0022 {I4} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0034 mb/sr {I5} at 5|', 0.0024 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0094 {I12} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0074 mb/sr {I9} at 5|', 0.0078 mb/sr {I9} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0060 {I8} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0070 mb/sr {I9} at 5|', 0.0076 mb/sr {I9} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0014 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0021 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0009 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0158 {I18} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0109 mb/sr {I13} at 5|', 0.0119 mb/sr {I13} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0030 {I5} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0011 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0027 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0088 {I11} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0070 mb/sr {I9} at 5|', 0.0092 mb/sr {I11} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0113 {I13} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0034 mb/sr {I5} at 5|', 0.0063 mb/sr {I8} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0061 {I9} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0042 mb/sr {I6} at 5|', 0.0132 mb/sr {I15} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0020 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0016 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0018 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0022 {I4} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0033 mb/sr {I5} at 5|', 0.0030 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0011 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0011 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0007 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0009 {I2} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0026 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0022 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0015 {I3} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0012 mb/sr {I3} at 5|', 0.0014 mb/sr {I2} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0028 {I4} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0019 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0030 mb/sr {I4} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0068 {I9} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0068 mb/sr {I9} at 5|', 0.0089 mb/sr {I10} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s(|q=30|')/d|W (mb/sr)=0.0091 {I11} 
$d|s/d|W=0.0137 mb/sr {I16} at 5|', 0.0115 mb/sr {I13} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$Optical spectroscopy (1931Sc03,1935Sc04); |p from |m and L(d,t)=1. 
MOMM1$Measured using the nuclear magnetic resonance using optically pumped ions technique; Other: 0.560226 {I3} (1961Ca21) 
MOME2$Measured using the muonic x-ray hyperfine structure technique; Others: 0.38 {I4} (1986Ul02), 0.39 {I5} or 0.27 {I4} (1979Ha08), 0.41 {I4} (1965Mu15), 0.46 {I4} (1960Mc11) and 0.53 {I4} (1975Ed01) 
$Magnetic octupole moment=-0.15 (1976Fu06) 
$Isotope shift studied by 1973BoVN, 1975Ge04. Hyperfine anomalies studied by 1973Re04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$1.5648|g M1+E2 to 3/2-; |g|g(|q) in 1983Sc38 excludes J|p=3/2- and 5/2- 
T$From |g-ce(|Dt) in 2007Me12. Other: 56 ns {I19} from B(E2)|^=0.127 {I20}, weighted average of 0.104 {I25} and 0.145 {I22} (1979Ha08). Since the uncertainties quoted in 1979Ha08 are only statistical and the Coulomb excitation contributions to the 26 keV level (J|p=5/2-) were not taken into account, the value should be considered as approximate 
$B(E2)|^=0.104 {I25} and 0.145 {I22} (1979Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$From nuclear resonant scattering in 2005Is19 
J$26.34|g M1+E2 to 3/2-; L(d,t)=1+3; L(d,p)=1+3; J|p=5/2- from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1980Bo05) 
T$From the time difference between the incident X-ray and the fluorescence signal from the {+201}Hg atom in 2018Yo02. Other: 630 ps {I50} from ce-|g(|Dt) in 1983Sc38 
$B(E2)|^|<0.07 (1983Sc38), 0.00 {I15} and 0.00 {I18} (1979Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$30.6|g M1+E2 to 1/2-; 32.19|g M1+E2 to 3/2-; |g|g(|q) in {+201}Tl |e decay excludes J|p=1/2- 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.14 {I5} (1983Sc38); others: 0.2 ns (1961Re12), |<2 ns (1961Be29) and >0.1 ns (1971Wa17) 
$B(E2)|^=0.14 {I5} (1983Sc38) in Coulomb excitation; Others: 0.13 {I15} and 0.10 {I4} (1979Ha08) 
MOME2$0.3 {I15} or 0.09 {I20} (1979Ha08) using muonic x-ray hyperfine structure technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$165.88|g M1 to 1/2-, 167.43|g M1+E2 to 3/2-; L(d,t)=1; |g|g(|q) in 1975Ho08 and 1983Sc38 excludes J|p=3/2- 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.016 {I3}, weighted average of 0.017 {I4} (1983Sc38) and 0.014 {I4} (1980Bo05). Other: <2 ns in 1961Be29. 
$B(E2)|^=0.017 {I4} (1983Sc38) and 0.014 {I4} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation, and 0.017 {I12} (1979Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J$352.42|g M1(+E2) to 3/2-; 358.36|g M1+E2 to 5/2-; population in Coulomb excitation 
$B(E2)|^=0.085 {I5} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$414.49|g E2 to 3/2-, 388.26|g M1+E2 to 5/2- 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.152 {I6} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation 
$B(E2)|^=0.152 {I6} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3; 464.39|g M1+E2 to 3/2- 
$B(E2)|^=0.209 {I5} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.209 {I5} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2,5/2
level_comment:
J$517.0|g to 5/2-; 542.6|g to 3/2-; population in {+201}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=3/2+) argues against J|p=7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$521.0|g E2 to 5/2-; not population in {+201}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=3/2+) argues against J|p=1/2- 
T$Upper limit from 1964Br27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-,5/2-
level_comment:
J$385.1|g to 1/2-, 526.8|g to 5/2-; population in Coulomb excitation would argue against J|p=3/2+ 
$B(E2)|^=0.035 {I2} (1980Bo05) in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3. The feeding of this level in {+201}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=3/2+) would argue against J|p=7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$218.9|g M2+E3 to 9/2-; L(d,t)>4 
T$Weighted average of 92 |ms {I3} (1961Kr01), 100 |ms {I6} (1962Eu01) and 94 |ms {I3} (1976Uy01) in {+201}Hg IT decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$From 2005Is19 
T$From the time difference between the incident X-ray and the fluorescence signal from the {+201}Hg atom in 2018Yo02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$|d|n({+202}Hg,{+198}Hg)=-10100 MHz {I180} (2021Da01) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+202}Hg,{+198}Hg)=+0.197 fm{+2} {I3}(stat) {I14}(syst) (2021Da01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$439.56|g E2 to 0+; L(p,t)=2. 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.608 {I5}. Other: 24 ps {I5} (1955Me35) in {+202}Hg(|g,|g'). 
$B(E2)|^=0.608 {I5}, weighted average of B(E2)|^=0.616 {I9} (1979Bo16) and 0.605 {I5} (1980Sp05). Other: B(E2)|^=0.65 {I8} (1970Ka09) 
MOMM1$From g=+0.392 {I31} in 1995Br34,2020StZV using the transient field perturbed angular correlation technique. Others: g=0.37 {I4} (1990Ba40), 0.44 {I9} (1986Ko02), 0.51 {I14} (1970Ka09) and 0.50 {I10} (1974Do01). 
MOME2$From 1980Sp05,2021StZZ. Other: 0.32 {I14} (1979Bo16). Both values were deduced using the reorientation effect in Coulomb excitation technique. The agreement between 1980Sp05 and 1979Bo16 is poor, but the former value is recommended by the evaluator. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$960.1|g E2 to 0+; L(p,t)=2 
$B(E2)|^(0{++} to 2{++}{-2})=0.0035 {I10} and B(E2)|^(2{++}{-1} to 2{++}{-2})=0.053 {I18} (1979Bo16) 
T$Weighted average of 11 ps {I4} from B(E2)|^ in 1979Bo16 and 16 ps {I4} from B(E2,520.13|g)(e{+2}b{+2}) in 1985Ag01. Others: 28.6 ps {I26} from B(E2,960.1|g)(W.u.) and 29 ps {I5} from B(E2,520.13|g)(W.u.) in 2019Ke01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$680.4|g E2 to 2+ 
$B(E2)|^(2{++}{-1} to 4{++}{-1})=0.34 {I1} (1979Bo16) 
T$Weighted average of 2.05 ps {I4} (2019Ke01), 2.11 ps {I19} (1985Ag01) and 2.03 ps {I6} (1979Bo16). Values determined from the B(E2) data 
MOMM1$From g=+0.341 {I68} in 1995Br34,2020StZV using the transient field perturbed angular correlation technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$129.2|g from 4+, 222.2|g M1+E2 to 2+, 1182.4|g to 0+ 
T$Weighted average of 11 ps {I+2-10} from B(E2,742.8|g)(W.u.) and 11 ps {I+8-11} from B(E2,222.2|g)(W.u.) in 2019Ke01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=4, 351.6|g (E2) to 2+ 
T$Weighted average of 5.4 ps {I7} from B(E2,351.6|g)(W.u.) and 5.9 ps {I6} from B(E2,872.0|g)(W.u.) in 2019Ke01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1389.5|g (E2) to 0+, 950.0|g (E2+M1), |DJ=0 to 2+ 
T$From B(E2,1389.5|g)(W.u.)=0.013 {I1} in 2019Ke01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$456.3|g to 4+; 615.6|g (E2),|DJ=0 to 2+ 
T$From B(E2,1135.6|g)(W.u.)=0.47 {I2} in 2019Ke01. Other: 1.1 ps {I4} from B(E2,615.6|g)(W.u.)=17 {I6} in 2019Ke01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2; 1354.8|g M1+E2 to 2+, 1794.4|g to 0+ 
T$From B(E2,833|g)(W.u.)=6 {I3} in 2019Ke01. Other: 0.08 ps {I6} from B(E2,1794.4|g)(W.u.)=0.13 {I6} in 2019Ke01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$868.9|g E2 to 4+ 
T$From B(E2,868.9|g)(W.u.)=24.9 {I1} in 2019Ke01. Other: 0.65 ps {I6} from B(E2,868.9|g)=0.175 e{+2}b{+2} {I15} in 1985Ag01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$84.2|g to 5-; systematics in neighboring nuclei 
T$From 164|g-440|g(|Dt) and the centroid-shift analysis (2021Su02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$669.3|g to (4+); 1853.5|g to 2+; J>3 from excitation function in {+202}Hg(n,n'|g) 
T$From B(E2,1853.5|g)(W.u.)=3.40 {I5} in 2019Ke01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$1869.6|g to 2+; J>3 from excitation function in {+202}Hg(n,n'|g); feeding from J|p=1-,2- neutron capture state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$991.4|g to (1+,2+); feeding from J|p=1-,2- neutron resonance capture state; observation in Coulomb Excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$From p(|q) in {+202}Hg(p,p'); J>3 from excitation function in {+202}Hg(n,n'|g); 1045|g to 4+, 1917.2|g to 2+; population in Coulomb Excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$From |a(|q) in Coulomb Excitation; p(|q) in {+202}Hg(p,p') 
T$Upper limit from B(E3)(W.u.)=21 {I1} in 2019Ke01. Other: <20.7 ps an upper limit from B(E3)|^=0.42 {I4} in 1991Li03 
$B(E3)|^=0.42 {I4} from Coulomb Excitation (1991Li03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_comment:
J$692.8|g to (11-); systematics of similar structures in neighboring nuclei 
CONF$Probable |n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2-
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From 2021Wa16 
J$Thermal neutron capture from {+201}Hg(J|p=3/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.608 {I5}, weighted average of B(E2)|^=0.616 {I9} (1979Bo16) and 0.605 {I5} (1980Sp05). Other: B(E2)|^=0.65 {I8} (1970Ka09) 
MOMM1$g=0.366 {I35} (1990Ba40), 0.44 {I9} (1986Ko02) and 0.59 {I15} (1970Ka09) 
MOME2$0.17 {I14} or 0.32 {I14} in 1979Bo16 and 1.01 {I13} in 1980Sp05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^(0{++} to 2{++}{-2})=0.0035 {I10} and B(E2)|^(2{++}{-1} to 2{++}{-2})=0.053 {I18} in 1979Bo16. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
E$Other: 2709 keV {I3} from 1981Ba45 (|a,|a') E(|a)=27 MeV, magnetic spectrometer |a'(|q). 
$B(E3)|^=0.42 {I4} (1991Li03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$ previous 0+ assignment in 1990Ve13 is not confirmed in 2013Be21 
$d|s/d|W=0.0113 mb/sr {I13} at 5|', 0.0102 mb/sr {I12} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$ previous 0+ assignment in 1990Ve13 is not confirmed in 2013Be21 
$d|s/d|W=0.0025 mb/sr {I4} at 5|', 0.0016 mb/sr {I3} at 17.5|' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$From optical spectroscopy (1964Re03); |p from L(d,p)=3 and |m 
T$Weighted average of 46.582 d {I23} (46.582 d {I2} in 1980Ho17, but uncertainty increased to 0.05% by the evaluator), 46.600 d {I23} (46.600 d {I10} in 1982RuZV, but uncertainty increased to 0.05% by the evaluator), 46.612 d {I19} (1983Wa26), 46.639 d {I23} (2006Da20) and 46.615 d {I27} (2014Un01). Others: 47.00 d {I3} (1968La10), 46.60 d {I2} (1972MeZQ, superseded by 1982RuZV), 46.76 d {I8} (1972Em01), 46.62 d {I3} (1982HoZJ, superseded by 2014Un01), 46.6 d {I1} (2001Li17) and 46.615 d {I27} (2002Un02, superseded by 2014Un01) 
MOMM1$Recommended (corrected for a diamagnetic shielding) in 2019StZV. Measured values are: +0.84895 {I13} (1970Ki05), 0.856 {I9} (1970Re14 - corrected for a diamagnetic shielding) and 0.830 {I20} (1964Re03). 
MOME2$Recommended in 2016St14, based on data in 1970Re14. Others: +0.343 {I36} (1986Ul02) and 0.5 {I8} (1964Re03). 
$|d<r{+2}>({+198}Hg,{+203}Hg)=0.232 fm{+2} {I4} (stat) {I16} (syst) (2021Da01) and |d<r{+2}>({+198}Hg,{+203}Hg)=0.2288 fm{+2} {I36} (stat) (1986Ul02) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=1; L(d,t)=(1) 
T$Using B(E2)(W.u.)=0.127 for the |n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) (J|p=1/2-) to |n(f{-5/2}{+-}) (J|p=5/2-) E2 transition in {+205}Pb and |a(7.49|g)=4.1E5, a half-life of |?6.5 |ms could be expected 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$341.5|g to (9/2-); shell-model predictions 
T$Weighted average of 21 |ms {I5} (1964Br27), 27 |ms {I5} (1986Ze03) and 21.9 |ms {I10} (2011St21) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (39/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$145.5|g E2 to (35/2+) 
T$From 261|g+533|g+847|g+1320|g (start)-369|g+639|g+1013|g+1066|g (stop)(|Dt) (2011Sz01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (53/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$ 753.9|g to (47/2-), 1320.3|g to (49/2-); shell model predictions 
T$From 2152|g (start)-261|g+533|g+847|g+1320|g (stop)(|Dt) (2011Sz01) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-2})|n(i{-13/2}{+-3}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 21 |ms {I5} (1964Br27), 27 |ms {I5} (1986Ze03) and 21.9 |ms {I10} (2011St21) 
$Experimental isomeric ratio=11.8% {I+11-20} (2011St21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (53/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$From 2152|g (start)-261|g+533|g+847|g+1320|g (stop)(|Dt) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-2})|n(i{-13/2}{+-3}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$Charge distribution studied: |D<r{+2}>({+204}Hg,{+198}Hg)=0.333 {I11} (1989BuZP), |D<r{+2}>({+204}Hg,{+A}Hg)=0.298 {I28}, 0.271 {I26}, 0.194 {I19}, 0.182 {I23}, 0.099 {I28} for A=198-202, respectively (1978Le09), |D<r{+2}>({+204}Hg,{+206}Hg)=-0.107 {I5} (1999GaZX). Other: 1979Ha08 
$Isotope shifts: 1977Du03, 1975Ro10, 1972Bo09 
$ ------------------------- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$436.551|g E2 to 0+; L(d,{+3}He)=2, vector analyzing power 
BE2$0.427 {I3}, weighted average of 0.429 {I4} in (e,e') (1989BuZP) and 0.427 {I6} (1979Bo16) and 0.423 {I5} (1981Es03) in Coul. ex. 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.427 {I3} 
MOME2$From Coul. ex., assuming negligible contributions from low-lying unobserved states (1981Es03). Other: 0.39 {I20} or 0.24 {I20}, depending on positive or negative interference of the E2 matrix elements (1979Bo16). 
MOMM1$This value is deduced by the evaluators from |m({+198}Hg)=0.75 {I5} (average of 1995Br34 and 1990Ba40) and |m({+204}Hg)/|m({+198}Hg)=0.89 {I10}. Note that g({+204}Hg)/g({+198}Hg)=0.95 {I11} in 1974Do01, but |w{+2}|t{-c} is changed by evaluators from 4.6 ns{+-1} 8 (1974Do01) to 4.1 ns{+-1} 7, due to change in T{-1/2}(437-keV level) from 36 ps {I2} to 40.3 ps {I3}. Others (renormalized to the same |m({+198}Hg) value): 0.55 {I10} (1970Ka09) by IMPAC method and 0.62 {I18} (1986Ko02) by TF method 
MOMM1$ 1974Do01 was by recoil-in-vacuum normalized to recoil-in-gas; 1970Ka09 was by perturbed AC's after ion implantation and yielded 0.80(20) from the ratio g(204)/g(198)=0.73(12), but using the same updated g(198) as above this becomes 0.55(10); 1986Ko02 was by transient field and yielded 0.86(18), again depending upon mu(198), so the updated value becomes 0.62(18). All three values are consistent. Wtd avg would give 0.62(6). 
$|b{-2}=0.061 from optical model in (|a,|a'), -0.069 from coupled-channels analysis in (p,p'). The sign convention in (|a,|a') is not explained; in (p,p') it is based on the sign for {+198}Hg. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$691.74|g E2 to 2+; population in Coul. ex., (e,e'), and (p,p') 
$B(E2)=0.218 {I16} (1985Ag01). Other: 0.34 {I11} (1981Es03). Both values were deduced by the evaluators from B(E2)(4+ to 2+)=0.121 {I9} (1985Ag01) and 0.19 {I6} (1981Es03). 
T$From B(E2)(4+ to 2+)=0.121 {I9} (1985Ag01) 
$B(E4)|^=0.045 {I6} from (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$From excitation function in (n,n'|g); 1280.2|g (M1+E2) to 2+. 
J$xfunc says J=2, G(THETA) says DJ=0 or 1 (M1+E2) (E1 out by ~3sigma) ==> JPI=2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$1392.15|g (E1) to 2+; intense feeding of this level in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=2-) favors J|p=(1-,2,3-); absence of observed |g to 0+ g.s. and the lack of population in (e,e') and (p,p') favor 2-; excit. function in (n,n'|g) indicates J=(2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1404.82|g M1+E2 to 2+; 1841.38|g M1 to 0+; L(d,{+3}He)=2. 
J$Probable excitation in (P,P') favors 1- or 2+, however? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
J$723.0|g M1+E2 to 4+ and 1414.9|g M1+E2 to 2+ indicate J|p=3+. However, their corresponding excit. functions in (n,n'|g) suggest J=2 for the 1851 keV level; 1851.7|g to 0+ g.s. is observed tentatively only in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay. If this is confirmed, 3+ can be ruled out. 
J$Decays to 2+ and 4+ restrict Jpi to 2+,3,4+; xfunc says J=2, but ADs prefer J=3 and rule out E1 ==> not 3-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$1511.10|g to 2+, 1947.76|g to 0+; L(d,{+3}He)=2; population in Coul. ex. and (e,e') favor 2+. 
J$Decays to 0+ and 2+ restrict Jpi to 1,2+; L=2 selects (1,2,3)+, VAP says not 3+, leaving 1+,2+; [weaker argument: AD of 1511 rules out DJ=1 E1, so no 1-]; (e,e') prefers natural parity and Coulex likes E2 transitions ==> 2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$1552.8|g to 2+; population in Coul. ex., (e,e'), and (p,p') favors natural-parity levels; direct population in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=(2-)) rules out 4+. 
J$Decay to 2+ ==> (0+,1,2,3,4+); AD of 1553 in (n,n'g) indicates not stretched E1, ruling out 1-,3-, and anisotropy rules out J=0 ==> (1+,2,3+,4+); (e,e') tends to populate natural-parity states, ruling out 1+,2-,3+ ==> (2+,4+); finally, logft=5.9 indicates not 4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$1657.9|g M1+E2 to 2+; excit. functions in (n,n'|g) favor J>3 
$Possible observation in (E,E') suggests natural parity (3-,4+), but these are unfavored by 1657.9G(THETA). (e,e') is uncertain, however. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_comment:
J$1694.7|g to 2+; L(d,{+3}He)=2, but it is an unresolved doublet 
J$If proven to be the 2120 level of (D,3HE), then JPI=(1,2)+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+,3+)
level_comment:
J$1704.3|g (M1+E2) to 2+; direct population in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=(2-)) 
J$Decay to 2+ ==> (0+,1,2,3,4+), but logft rules out J=0 and 4. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1062.8|g E2 to 4+; L(p,p')=6 
J$Also have E1 from 7-, but use that to assign 7- not other way around. 
T$From B(E2)(6+ to 4+)=0.139 {I17} (1985Ag01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3,4,5
level_comment:
J$1107.7|g D to 4+; 
J$...not consistent with stretched E2 or non-stretched E1 ==> (3,4+,5). If indeed in (e,e'), favor nat.parity ==> (3-,4+,5-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$1134.7|g E1 to 4+; population in (e,e') and (p,p') 
J$Also J GE 3 in (D,6LI), stretched (most likely) dipole in (n,n'g) and (9Be,9Be'g), L=2+5 composite state in (d,3He). 
BE5$0.041 {I9} from (e,e') (1989BuZP) 
$BE5|^(W.u.)=10.8 24 
$Possible configuration= |p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3)
level_comment:
J$1827.80|g to 2+; excit. function in (n,n'|g); direct population in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=(2-)) makes 0+ and 4+ unlikely. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$109.6|g E1 to 6+; population in (e,e') and (p,p') 
T$Weighted average of 6.7 ns {I5} from (d,pn|g) (1984Sc19) and 6.9 ns {I3} from ({+9}Be,{+9}Be'|g) (1994Po21). 
$B(E7)|^: 32|*10{+-4} {I13} from (e,e') 
$BE7|^(W.u.)=3.9 16 
$Possible configuration: admixture of |p[(s{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+}|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-1}] and |p[(d{-3/2}){+-1}(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1,2,3
level_comment:
J$1959.0|g to 2+; direct population in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=(2-)) rules out 0+ and 4+ 
J$possible G to 2+ in 204AU B-, probably excited in (P,P'), (E,E'). 
J$Latter suggests natural parity, (0+,1-,2+,3-,4+) all of which could decay to 2+. There is no decay to 4+, contrary to previous evaluation! Logft=7.2 ==> (1,2,3), but it is getting high enough that DJ=2 may be a possibility. Therefore, cannot really draw any conclusions here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,4+,6+)
level_comment:
J$1386.2|g M1,E2 to 4+; population in (e,e') and (p,p') rules out 3+ and 5+ 
J$G to 4+ and A2>0 in (n,n'g) ==> (2+,3+,4,5+,6+); possible observation in (e,e') and (p,p') suggest natural parity ==> (2,4,6)+. Not strong enough argument, though, since the latter are not firm. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$Population in (e,e'), (|a,|a'), (p,p'), and Coul. ex. Collective octupole vibration 
J$G's to 2+ and 4+ in (n,n'g). 
BE3$Weighted average of 0.42 {I4} in (e,e') (1989BuZP) and 0.37 {I4} in Coul. ex. (1991Li03). 
$|b{-3}=0.076 from optical model in (|a,|a'), 0.089 from coupled-channels analysis in (p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3)
level_comment:
J$1598.4|g to 4+, 897.9|g to (2-); direct population in {+204}Au |b{+-} decay (J|p=(2-)) makes 4- assignment unlikely. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$From L=3 in (p,p'), (e,e'); 2376.26|g to 2+ 
BE3$From (e,e') 
$|b{-3}=0.046 from coupled-channels analysis in (p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5,6)-
level_comment:
J$770.2|g to 5-; L(d,{+3}He)=2+5. 
J$Decay to 5- ==> (3-,4,5,6,7-), L=5 ==> (4,5,6)-. Note no L=2 component b/c ==> (1,2,3)+ which contradicts observed G. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E$a multiplet 3320 keV {I15} level is observed in (d,{+3}He) with L=2+5, neither component of which is consistent with J|p=3- deduced in (e,e') and (p,p') for this level. 
BE3$From (e,e') 
$BE3UP(W.u.)=6.3 8 
$|b{-3}=0.048 from coupled-channels analysis in (p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
E$Weighted average of 3475 {I14} in (e,e') and 3460 {I15} in (d,{+3}He). 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=2; population in (e,e') favors 2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0,2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,{+3}He)=0+2; possible observation in (e,e') and (p,p') favors (0,2)+ 
J$[assuming the L(3890) and G(3869),C(3860) are the same state...] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Levels observed in (e,e') and in (p,p') do not overlap within uncertainties and may be two distinct states. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$1984Cr01: (2+,3+) Although no G to GS observed, 2+ assignment may be valid because similar situation exists in 200Hg, with rather weak second 2+ to 0+ decays. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1984Cr01: Similar decay strength to g.s. and 2+ at 437, so J=1 proposed; no (-) states expected below 3-, so 1+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$1984Cr01: moderately fed by B-, primarily decays to first 2+, no decay to g.s. observed, but may be weak, hence (2+,3+-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+,3+)
level_comment:
J$1984Cr01: moderately fed by B-, primarily decays to first 2+, no decay to g.s. observed, but may be weak. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$1984Cr01: no Jpi assigned. Another level was assigned at 3669. Removed by Schmorak upon re-placement of 1828 and 1680 gammas. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$436.7 23 2+ 40.1 PS 4 Changed our minds...average the BE2 in the AL,G and get T1/2 there. 
J$"known unambiguously from literature" 
T$Calculated from BE2UP using EG and ALPHA from adopted gammas. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$M(E0)[e(fm){+2}]=1.1 {I7} 
J$This state is either 0+ or 1+ from (e,e'p) (1987Qu01), but 1+ would be a transverse excitation, whereas state was observed clearly at forward angles. Fourier-Bessel analysis describes it as 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$From comparison of the shape of the form factor (q_eff positions of max and min) with states already assigned Jpi. [q_eff = effective energy-momentum transfer] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$From comparison of the shape of the form factor (q_eff positions of max and min) with states already assigned Jpi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$AD of 436.58 consistent w/E2...well, almost, should be larger, unless it is smaller due to deorientation of the alignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)
level_comment:
J$Shape of xfunc of 1280.2 indicates spin ~2; nonzero a2 rules out 0. 
J$AD essentially rules out E1 (A2 not large enough), so probably (2+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$Note that the level is assigned (2-) in adopted levels 
J$Shape of xfunc of 1392.3 consistent w/2+ assigned by 1984Cr01 (gammas from 204Au beta decay). AD of 1392.3 could be DJ=0 or E2 or strongly mixed DJ=1 M1+E2. E2 ruled out because anisotropic AD ==> not 0+ --> 2+ and xfunc ==> not 4+ --> 2, but most likely J=2. Either parity works. Evaluator says J=(2), 1989Ga07 more confident, 2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1,2+
level_comment:
J$Decays to g.s. and first 2+. Can't be 0->0, and not likely to have DJ>3, so (1,2+). AD of 1841.4 rules out E2 and thus 2+, while AD of 1405.0 rules out E1 and thus 1-. Evaluator says Jpi=(1+), 1989Ga07 are less confident, 1,2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$Decays to g.s. and first 2+; large a2>0 for 1680.9 and 2117.5. 1989Ga07 say ==> 2+; strongly mixed DJ=1 M1/E2 not ruled out by AD, but cannot have E2 component in 1+ --> 0+ ==> Jpi=2+ only option. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3)
level_comment:
J$AD of 1704.3 consistent with anything but E2, could even be 0->2 since AD would be flat. Evaluator says J<=3. 1989Ga07 do not include the J=0 case. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$AD of 1134.7 consistent with DJ=1 dipole ==> (3,5); xfunc indicates J GE 4 ==> 5; no proof of parity change, however. Evaluator says J=5; 1989Ga07 call it 5-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)
level_comment:
J$Evaluator tentatively assigns (2+), 1989Ga07 left off the (+) even though G to 4+ would require it.... Note, an 1863 AD was not fitted. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$G to g.s. rules out J=0. AD is not useful. 1989Ga07 assign nothing, although we are able to say it should be Jpi=(1,2+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$Large a2<0 for 1440G rules out E2 and DJ=0 E1. In fact, rules out E1 and DJ=0 M1 as well, leaving only M1+E2. Evaluator says 3+,5+, but 1989Ga07 make no assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$ADs of 1547.0 and 2238.7 both have a2<0, with large uncertainties. Decays are to 4+ and 2+, respectively. E2 and DJ=0 E1 ruled out for both, so the former gives (3,4+,5) and the latter (1,2+,3), and the only overlap is for J=3. 1989Ga07 suggest (3-), but no justification given for parity choice. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$From fit to AD. 
$198Hg known to have oblate def, so beta2<0 taken for all. 
$BpE2(0+ to 2+)=3770e2fm4=0.377(eb){+2} (w/estimated 10% unc) deduced from beta2,fol(m); should be equal to EM BE2=0.425(eb){+2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$From fit to AD. 
$Sign of beta4 taken from prelim calcs on 198,200Hg. 
$BpE4(0+ to 4+)=0.049 e2b4; EM BE4=0.0447(60) e2b4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
J$From fit to AD. 
$Direct excitation of 6+ known from (e,e'); therefore, beta6 def included here. beta6<0 gave better description of ADs. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
$Appears to be direct excitation of 7- here, only small % accountable by two-step excitation; therefore, beta7 def included here. beta7<0 gave slightly better description of ADs. 
J$Not a very good AD fit, esp. at low angles! Not great proof of 7-? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$From fit to AD, confirming ass't in (e,e') by 1989BuZP (assumed to be the same state at E=4100(17)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J$1984Sc19 argue J<6 because depopulating 1134G has more intensity at lower E(d) than does the g1062 depopulating the 6+ 2191 state. 
J$CE and G(THETA) indicate stretched E1, so should be definitive 5-, but 1984Sc19 give it as tentative. 
$Proposed configuration: |p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3)
level_comment:
J$From adopted levels. 1984Sc19 assigned 1172.0|g and 109.6|g as both decaying from a 7- state at 2301. Other reactions find two distinct, nearly degenerate states with J|p=7- and J=(2). See adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 1984Sc19 based on ce(t). 
$Proposed configuration: admixture of |p[(s{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+}|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-1}] and |p[(d{-3/2}){+-1}(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|q=75|') (|mb/sr)=52 {I16} 
E$Impurity peaks in d' spectra prevented definitive identification. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|b{-3}=0.076 octupole vibration using scattering potential from optical model fit to elastic scattering data. 
J$Assignment supported by angular distributions from inelastic scattering, which agree with octupole phonon coupled-channels predictions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration (no collectivity, though!): PI[(s{-1/2}){+-2}]NU[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(f{-5/2}){+-1}] 
J$AD of 436 ~weakly supports AL,G assignment as 2+. But it's gotta be! 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration (no collectivity, though!): PI[(s{-1/2}){+-2}]NU[(f{-5/2}){+-2}] 
J$AD of 692 supports assignment as 4+, but why is a2 so much larger than for 436 or 1062? Interference from 72Ge(n,n'g) peak? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$Note that the level is assigned (2-) in adopted levels 
$1994Po21 claims: 2+; AL,G: (2-) 
J$2+ requires that 1392 be DJ=0. Even with |delta|>>0, A2 never gets negative enough to be consistent with measured value. JPI=2- means DJ=0 E1, which is not consistent. AD looks like DJ=1 M1+E2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: (2+); AL,G: (1,2)+ 
J$Decays to 0+,2+ (though the former, 1841G, not observed in 1994Po21). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: (3+); AL,G: (2,3)+ 
J$d(a2) is too large to say what mult 723 has! AD of 723G is somewhat inconsistent with E1, but not conclusive. JPI fixed by G's to 2+,4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: 2+ ; AL,G: 1+,2+ 
J$No AD info, decays to 2+; also to 0+, in (n,n'g) by 1989Ga07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration for a JPI=6+ assignment (no collectivity!): PI[(s{-1/2}){+-1}(d{-3/2}){+-1}]NU[(f{-5/2}){+-2}] 
$1994Po21 claims: 6+ ; AL,G: 6+ 
J$AD of 1062 weakly supports AL,G assignment as 6+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: (5+); AL,G: (3+,4+,5+) 
J$"a2<0" to 4+, but d(a2)=|a2|! ~consistent w/dipole, but not 4- -> 4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration: |p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+} 
$1994Po21 claims: 5- ; AL,G: 5- 
J$a2<0 to 4+; consistent w/dipole, but not 4- -> 4+. level populated by l=5 in (d,3He) by 1989Gr09. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$Degeneracy with (2+) level not explicitly noted in 1994Po21. 
E$In other words, they had 2299.3 and 2299.4 in one of their tables, but not the other or in the level scheme. Also no suggestion of any other spin assignment. So not clear if they knew about that state. 
J$No basis for assignment except comparison to 1984Sc19. Take state with same lifetime from adopted levels. 
T$from 1062.4|g(t). 
$Proposed configuration: |p[(d{-3/2}){+-1}(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: (9-); AL,G: >=5; could be (5-,6,7,8,9-) -> too many! 
J$a2>0 of 424G suggests E2, but d(a2)>|a2|! Decays to (7-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: (6-); AL,G: (5-,6,7-) 
J$No AD info; decays to 7- and to 5- (both from AL,G) ==> (5-,6,7-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$1994Po21 claims: (8+); AL,G: new state 
J$No AD info; decays to 2723 (9-) [actually to (5-,6,7,8,9-)]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.425 {I4}, weighted average of 0.427 {I6} (1979Bo16) and 0.423 {I5} (1981Es03). Other: 0.37 {I4} (1970Ka09). 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.425 {I4}. 
MOME2$0.40 {I20} (1981Es03). The authors assume negligible contributions from low-lying unobserved states. Other: 0.39 {I20} or 0.24 {I20} (1979Bo16), depending on positive or negative interference of the E2 matrix elements. 
MOMM1$0.67 {I9}. This value is deduced by the evaluators from |m({+198}Hg)=0.75 {I5} (average of 1995Br34 and 1990Ba40) and |m({+204}Hg)/|m({+198}Hg)=0.89 {I10}. Note that g({+204}Hg)/g({+198}Hg)=0.95 {I11} in 1974Do01, but |w{+2}|t{-c} is changed by evaluators from 4.6 ns{+-1} 8 (1974Do01) to 4.1 ns{+-1} 7, due to change in T{-1/2}(437-keV level) from 36 ps {I2} to 40.4 ps {I4}. Other: 0.55 {I10} (1970Ka09) 
$-----1970Ka09----- Ex=436.8(4); BE2(0+ -> 2+) = 0.37(4) (eb){+2}; g(2+)=0.40(10) -> mu=0.80(20) from deduced g(204)/g(198)=0.73(12) and g(198)=0.55(11) from 1964Ko15; tau=67(7)ps -> t1/2=46(5)ps calculated from BE2 
$-----1974Do01----- om{+2}*tau=4.6(8) ns{+-1} and g(2+)=0.95(11)*g(198Hg 2+) assuming tau=52(3)ps -> t1/2=36(2)ps. 437 not resolved from c439. 
$-----1977Kr11----- Another MOMM1(198HG), 0.70(14). 
$-----1979Bo02 (also 1979Bo16)----- Q2=0.24(20) or 0.39(20) eb; BE2(0+ -> 2+) = 0.427(6) (eb){+2} 
$-----1981Es03----- deB-W analysis assumed only 1128 nearby (<1.8MEV); there is also a Jpi=0+ 1636 [seen in (e,e'),(e,e'p),(d,3HE)] and a J=(2) 1717 [seen in (n,n'|g),(p,p')]. Since these states were not observed, presumably too weak to contribute. They also assume 1128 level is 4+ and has M40=0. BE2(0+ -> 2+) = 0.423(5) (eb){+2}, Q2 = 0.40(20) (eb) 
$1981Es03 (cont'd): level observed in (p,p') as well (438 2). 
$----- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.218 {I16} (1985Ag01) and 0.34 {I11} (1981Es03). Values were deduced by the evaluators from B(E2)(4+ to 2+)=0.121 {I9} (1985Ag01) and 0.19 {I6} (1981Es03) 
T$From B(E2)(4+ to 2+)=0.121 {I9} (1985Ag01) 
$1981Es03: level observed in (p,p') as well (1131 2). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.201 {I25}, deduced by the evaluators from B(E2)(6+ to 4+)=0.139 {I17} (1985Ag01) 
T$From B(E2)(6+ to 4+)=0.139 {I17} 
J$1985Ag01: JPI assigned based on RI(THETA) yield. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$Observed in 1991Li03 but cites energy from (|a,|a') of 1981Ba45. Level also seen in (p,p') of 1981Es03 (2682 {I3}) and 1991Ho07 (2672 {I4}). 
J$From 1991Li03. 
$B(E3)|^=0.37 {I4}, weighted average of 0.40 {I6} and 0.35 {I5} at E({+12}C)=54 and 55 MeV, respectively (1991Li03). The B(E3)|^ value corresponds to B(E3)(W.u.)=22 {I3}, which is comparable to the values for collective 3- states in the even A|>198 Hg isotopes. 
$1991Li03: BE3 value, weighted mean of 0.40(6) and 0.35(5) at E(12C) = 54 and 55 MeV, respectively. 
$(In (E,E') the measured BE3W=24 2) -> [needed here?] 
$Observed in (p,p') by 1981Es03 (2682 3). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$L transfer and vector analyzing power give 1+,2+; the latter is taken by 1989Gr09 from earlier Nuclear Data Sheets assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+
level_comment:
J$1989Gr09 said 1,2+, but this might have just been misleading notation since 1- should not be populated with L=2 in this reaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$1+,2+ from j=3/2 transfer in 1989Gr09. J|p=2+ taken by 1989Gr09 based on earlier Nuclear Data Sheets assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$L=5 for stronger member of multiplet. 1989Gr09 assume h{-11/2} transfer, J|p=5- based on 5- state in {+206}Hg. L=2 member indicates probable (1,2)+ level nearby, assuming d{-3/2} transfer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) using time difference between sum of 424|g and 965|g with sum of 1063|g, 692|g and 437|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15+
level_comment:
E$ordering of 735.7|g and 791.8|g is not determined, alternative placements would results in the 15+ level at 5180-keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 22+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$921|g exhibits no prompt (in beam) component. T{-1/2} limit deduced from experimental considerations of structure of beam pulsing. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)(W.u.) value for 692-keV transition. Value is 2.91 ps {I21} in {+204}Hg Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$this level is identified by 2017St09 as the main fragment of the 2+ mixed-symmetry state (MSS), based on large B(M1)|_ value of 0.200 {I23} for the 1511-keV transition to the first 2+ state, the assignment is also supported by the theoretical predictions 
T$mean lifetime |t=84.6 fs {I+142-74} from DSAM (2017St09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$predicted by shell-model calculations. 
E$ from sum of the 422.7, 964.8, 597.2, and 1013.9-keV |g rays which have equal half-lives, and are suggested to decay into the 7- isomer state, but the ordering of gamma-ray transitions is unknown. 
T$ from decay curve of delayed |g rays (2011St21). 
$Experimental isomeric state population ratio<10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$From 1975Ro10 using the optical pumping technique; |p from L(d,p)=1 
T$Weighted average of 5.1 min {I1} (1953Bu88) and 5.5 min {I3} (1960Po01). Other: 31.2 min {I25} for a fully-ionized {+205}Hg{+80{++}} atom (2010Ku02) 
MOMM1$From 1975Ro10,2014StZZ using the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance technique. 
CONF$|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$501.28|g (E1) from 9/2+, 210.3|g E3 from 13/2+, 966.62|g (M1) to 5/2- and 878.83|g to 3/2-. 
CONF$|n(f{-5/2}{+-1})~#|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},d{-3/2}{+-1}){-1{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J$161.4|g M2 from 13/2+; 1015.63|g to 5/2-. 
CONF$|n(f{-5/2}{+-1})~#|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},d{-3/2}{+-1}){-2{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$161.4|g M2 to 9/2-, 210.3|g E3 to 7/2-; systematics of similar isomers in neighboring nuclei 
T$Weighted average of 1.04 ms {I10} in {+204}Hg(d,p|g) (1986Ze03) and 1.10 ms {I4} in {+204}Hg(t,d|g) (1985Ma48). 
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_comment:
J$164.1|g (M1) to 9/2+ level; 455.1|g to 13/2+. 
CONF$Suggested in 1994Po21 (based on a shell-model predictions) as the |n(i{-11/2}{++1}) single-particle state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$722.6|g to (19/2+), 950.2|g to (17/2+); proposed configuration 
T$From (810.0|g+950.2|g)(t) in {+9}Be({+208}Pb,x|g) (2011St21) 
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}{+-1})~#|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},h{-11/2}{+-1}){-5{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$From adopted levels. 
$E=376 keV (1970An14). 
S$Using J=3/2 and 5/2, respectively. 
CONF$|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$From adopted levels. 
$E=468 keV (1970An14). 
S$Using J=5/2 and 3/2, respectively. 
CONF$|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$From adopted levels. 
T$From |g(t) (ms pulsed-beam experiment) using gates on the 379.42|g, 966.62|g and 1015.63|g. 
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_comment:
J,CONF$Suggested in 1994Po21 (based on a shell-model predictions) as the |n(i{-11/2}{++1}) single-particle state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From (810.0|g+950.2|g)(t) in 2011St21 
$Experimental isomeric state population ratio=3.3% {I+2-4} 
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}{+-1})~#|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},h{-11/2}{+-1}){-5{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 8.5 min {I1} (1962Ka27), 8.1 min {I4} (1964Wo05) and 8.15 min {I10} (1968Wo08). Others: 7.5 min {I10} (1961Nu01), 8.36 min {I+80-60} and 8.34 min {I+106-85} (1998Zh22) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+204}Hg,{+206}Hg)=-0.107 {I5} and |D<r{+2}>({+205}Hg,{+206}Hg)=-0.071 {I5} (2000Ga58) 
$Measured isotope shift relative to that of {+198}Hg: |d|n({+206}Hg,{+198}Hg)=-20930 MHz {I160} (2021Da01) 
$Measured radius relative to that of {+198}Hg: |d<r{+2}>({+206}Hg,{+198}Hg)=+0.409 fm{+2} {I3}(stat) {I29}(syst) (2021Da01). Other: 1986Ul02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1068.2|g E2 to 0+ 
T$From B(E2,exp)=4.4 W.u. {I6} in Coulomb Excitation (2023Mo04). Other: <21 ps from |g|g coin. data in {+204}Hg(t,p|g) (1982Be38). 
$Configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},d{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$1034.2|g E3 to 2+ 
T$Weighted average of 2.15 |ms {I21} (1982Be38), 2.09 |ms {I2} (2011St21), 2.08 |ms {I4} (2018La03) and 2.19 |ms {I7} (2015Al09) 
MOMM1$From the measured g-factor=1.09 {I1} in {+204}Hg(t,p|g) (1982Be38,2020StZV) using the perturbed angular distribution technique. The value is corrected for diamagnetic shielding and Knight shift. 
MOME2$From Q=0.65 {I13} determined in 1984Ma43 using the perturbed angular distribution technique and relative to Q({+199}Hg)=0.83 {I9}. The value was corrected by the evaluator to the adopted Q({+199}Hg)=0.95 {I7} (2021StZZ). 
$Configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 92 ns {I8} (2001Fo08), 90 ns {I10} (2001La09), 96 ns {I15} (2009Al29), 112 ns {I4} (2011St21) and 106 ns {I15} (2018La03) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_comment:
$Configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1},h{-11/2}{+-1}){-7-} |n(g{-9/2}p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5-}. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From 1034|g(t) and 1068|g(t) using the pulsed-beam technique in 1982Be38 
MOMM1$5.45 {I5} from the measured g-factor=1.09 {I1} in 1982Be38 using the perturbed angular distribution technique. The value was corrected for diamagnetic shielding and Knight shift 
MOME2$0.65 {I13} in 1984Ma43 using the perturbed angular distribution technique. This value is relative to Q({+199}Hg)=0.83 {I9} 
$Configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels 
$Configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) 
$Isomeric ratio is 3.7% {I7} (2002Pf01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 2001Fo08 using a time spectrum produced by summing gates on 364|g(t), 1157|g(t) and 1257|g(t). Other: 90 ns {I10} in 2001La09 using a time spectrum produced by gating on the same transitions as in 2001Fo08 
$Configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From sum of 1034|g(t) and 1068|g(t) in 2011St21. Other: 2.08 |ms {I4} in 2018La03 and 2.19 |ms {I7} (2015Al09) 
$Experimental isomeric state population ratio=21.9% {I+12-29} (2011St21) 
$Configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1}~#h{-11/2}{+-1}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From sum of 1156|g(t) and 1257|g(t) in 2011St21. Other: 106 ns {I15} in 2018La03 
$Experimental isomeric state population ratio=2.2% {I+7-8} (2011St21) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-2}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$From systematics. The assignment is tentative 
T$from |b(t) and |g(t) following {+207}Hg |b{+-} decay (1981JoZW) 
CONF$Expected |n(2g{-9/2}){++1} configuration. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
$Measured isotope shift relative to that of {+198}Hg: |d|n({+207}Hg,{+198}Hg)=-25790 MHz {I190} (2021Da01) 
$Measured radius relative to that of {+198}Hg: |d<r{+2}>({+207}Hg,{+198}Hg)=+0.503 fm{+2} {I4}(stat) {I35}(syst) (2021Da01) 
J$from Table I of 2021Da01. Compiler's note: 9/2+ was firmly assigned by 2020Ta03 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 062502) from L(n)=4 transfer in {+2}H({+206}Hg,p) reaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J$could not be unambiguously determined by 2021Da16. Authors adopt value from 2020Ta03. 
MOMM1,MOME2$from hyperfine structure measurement (2021Da16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from 1997Zh18. Earlier value from these authors has been reported as 42 min {I+23-12} (1994Zh02,1993Zh35,1993Zh07,1993ZhZU) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 132 s {I50} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. Previous value of 41 min {I+5-4} in {+208}Hg Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (April 2010 update), taken from 1997Zh18 (Chin. Phys. Lett. 14, 507; also 1998Zh22: Phys. Rev. C58, 156) is in severe disagreement with the present measurement. 2016Ca25 also cite in their reference 54 (private communication from Zs. Podolyak) an independent measurement at ISOLDE-CERN giving a half-life of less than a few minutes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from decay curve in 2020Ca25. Other: 144 s {I18} from accumulation curve in 2020Ca25 assuming a constant implant rate, not adopted by the authors; 41 min {I+23-12} from Adopted Levels of {+208}Hg in ENSDF database (2010 update); 132 s {I50} from 2016Ca25. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Measured isotope shift relative to that of {+198}Hg: |d|n({+208}Hg,{+198}Hg)=-32030 MHz {I160} (2021Da01) 
$Measured radius relative to that of {+198}Hg: |d<r{+2}>({+208}Hg,{+198}Hg)=+0.624 fm{+2} {I3}(stat) {I44}(syst) (2021Da01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from systematics in neighboring N=129 isotones (J|p=9/2+ in {+211}Pb, {+213}Po and {+215}Rn); J|p=9/2+ is predicted in 1997Mo25. 
T$weighted average of 35 s {I+9-6} from |b-324.0|g(t), 35 s {I+13-8} from |b-208.2|g(t), 42 s {I+24-11} from |b-738.8|g(t) and 36 s {I+16-8} from |b-1424.2|g(t) (1998Zh22,1998Zh19) 
$configuration=|n(g{-9/2}){++1}. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from {+209}Hg Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Sep 2013 update) 
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 6 s {I1} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. Previous value of 36 s {I+7-4} in {+209}Hg Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Sep 2013 update), taken from 1998Zh22 (Phys. Rev. C58, 156; also 1998Zh19: Eur. Phys. J. A54, 507) is in severe disagreement with the present measurement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
J$(3-) in 2013Go10, based on unobserved but expected highly converted 20 keV |g-ray feeding the (2+) state, 663|g to 0+ g.s., and calculated reduced transition strengths. Shell model calculation can not reliably predict the location of a 3- state, because it does not allow core excitations and also the 3- state in the lead region is very fragmented as mentioned in 2013Go10. For {+208}Pb, {+210}Pb, and {+214}Pb nuclides 3- state is prediction at much energy. 
T$From 663|g(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
J$(3-) in 2013Go10, based on unobserved but expected highly converted 20 keV |g-ray feeding the (2+) state, 663|g to 0+ g.s., and calculated reduced transition strengths. Shell model calculation can not reliably predict the location of a 3- state, because it does not allow core excitations and also the 3- state in the lead region is very fragmented as mentioned in 2013Go10. For {+208}Pb, {+210}Pb, and {+214}Pb nuclides 3- state is prediction at much higher energy. 
T$From 663|g(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 64 s {I12} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. 
$%|b{+-}n: beta-delayed neutron branching ratio deduced from implant-|b and implant-|b-neutron correlations detected in forward and backward directions (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=19 (1997Mo25) 
E$ it is assumed that the observed fragments correspond to nuclei in their ground state 
J$ 9/2+ from systematics (2012Au07), and 5/2+ predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of >100 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 10 s for |b decay (2012Au07) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Hg isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20%. Production |s=7.63 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress. From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), |? 50 events are assigned to {+211}Hg 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 26 s {I8} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. 
$%|b{+-}n: beta-delayed neutron branching ratio deduced from implant-|b and implant-|b-neutron correlations detected in forward and backward directions (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
%B-$the |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=2 (2019Mo01) 
T$ >300 ns from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 21 s for |b decay (2019Mo01) 
$Production |s=1.71 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from first author of 2010Al24, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), |?45 events are assigned to {+212}Hg; from figure 5 of 2017Ca12 |?70 events are assigned to {+212}Hg 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=4 (2019Mo01) 
E$ it is assumed that the observed fragments correspond to nuclei in their ground state 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), |? 35 events are assigned to {+213}Hg 
J$ 9/2+ from systematics (2021Ko07), and 5/2+ predicted in 2019Mo01 calculations. 
T$Calculated value 10 s for |b decay (2019Mo01), and systematic value of 15 s for |b decay (2021Ko07). 
$ Production |s=0.546 nb (from e-mail reply of H. Alvarez-Pol to B. Singh (Dated: Oct 29, 2010), which also stated that further analysis was in progress). 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Hg isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} and |b{+-}-delayed neutron decays are expected. 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=10 (2019Mo01) 
T$Experimental lower limit: 300 ns based on the minimum time-of-flight through FRS (2006Ca30); Actual halflife is expected to be much longer based on calcuated half-life for |b decay: 5.5 s (2019Mo01). 
$Production |s=0.247 nb with 10% statistical and 20% systematic uncertainties (2010Al24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ Production |s=61.8 pb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=4 (2019Mo01) 
E$ the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+215}Hg nuclei 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), 4 or 5 events are assigned to {+215}Hg 
T$ >300 ns from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical value of 0.40 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (2021Mo01), and systematics value of 1 s for |b decay (2012Au07) 
J$ 3/2+ from systematics (2012Au07), and 1/2 predicted in 2019Mo01 calculations 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number of Hg isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Production |s=53.0 pb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), 3 or 4 events are assigned to {+216}Hg 
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=6.5 (1997Mo25) 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 0.73 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 0.1 s for |b decay (2011AuZY) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Hg isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-,5-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ 2004Ke06 searched for |a decay, but none was observed, thus proton decay mode is assigned |?100%. Calculated half-lives (1997Mo25): 1.2 ms for |a decay and 362 ms for |b decay. This suggests that |a decay mode should compete favorably. 
E$ it is assumed by 2004Ke06 that the observed proton decay is ground state to ground state decay. There is no indication of a high-spin isomer in the data of 2004Ke06. From WKB calculations, high-spin level available for proton emission from h{-11/2} orbital should be at energy higher than 950 keV. Such a level may have either too short a half-life to be detected in the experiment of 2004Ke06 or it may decay by |g emission. 
J$ based on (7/2-,9/2-) for {+175}Hg g.s. and L=0 proton transition to this level from {+176}Tl g.s.. The L=0 (s{-1/2} orbital) transition is assigned from comparison of measured half-life of {+176}Tl decay with WKB calculations of half-life of 1.49 ms for s{-1/2}, 11.2 ms for d{-3/2} and 17.5 s for h{-11/2} orbitals. 
T$ from timing of proton decay (2004Ke06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A,%P$From 1999Po09, measured directly from decay energy spectra. 
$E|a=6907 keV {I7}, E(p)=1156 keV {I20} (1999Po09) 
J$Favored |a-decay to the {+173}Au g.s. (J|p=(1/2+)); J|p systematics. 
CONF$|p(s{-1/2}{+-1}) orbital. Favored |a-decay to the {+173}Au g.s. (|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})); comparisons between the measured partial proton half-life of T{-1/2}=67 ms {I37} and WKB calculations of 28 ms |p(s{-1/2}{+-1}), 0.21 s |p(d{-3/2}{+-1}) and 340 s |p(h{-11/2}{+-1}); systematics of configurations in neighboring odd-Z nuclei. 
$production cross section |s |? 10 nb (1999Po09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%A,%P$From 1999Po09, measured directly from decay energy spectra. Other: %|a= 45 {I20}, %p=55 {I20} in 2004Ke06 
$E|a=7487 keV {I13}, E(p)=1958 keV {I10} (1999Po09); Other: E|a=7472 keV {I11}, E(p)=1954 keV {I12} (2004Ke06). 
E$From measured E{-iso}(p) and E{-gs}(p) in 1999Po09 
T$Other: 160 |ms {I+70-40} from |a(t) and 290 |ms {I+150-110} from p(t) in 2004Ke06 
J$Favored |a-decay to the {+173}Au isomer (J|p=(11/2-)); J|p systematics. 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1}) orbital. Favored |a-decay to the {+173}Au isomer (|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})); comparisons between the measured partial proton half-life of T{-1/2}=451 |ms {I106} and WKB calculations of 1.8 ns |p(s{-1/2}{+-1}), 12.5 ns |p(d{-3/2}{+-1}) and 15 |ms |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})); systematics of configurations in neighboring odd-Z nuclei. 
$production cross section |s |? 30 nb (1999Po09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T From 2002Ro17. 
%|e+%|b{++}|?47, %|a|?53 (2003Au02) 
The {+178}Tl g.s. decays by four |a branches to states in {+174}Au, and by |e decay to {+178}Hg. The |a transition energies are: 6.859 {i5}, 6.785 {i5}, 6.704 {i5} and 6.616 {i15} MeV, with relative I(|a) of 10, 18, 59 and 13%, respectively (2002Ro17). Other: 1997Ca16 report E|a=6.87, 6.79, 6.71 MeV, for the first three branches. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-,5-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2013Li49 from summed |a spectrum in 6590-6870 energy interval. 
$ All decay modes are measured by 2013Li49 by comparison of intensities of |a decays from {+178}Tl parent and {+178}Hg daughter, using %|a=89 {I3} for the latter from literature. 
$ For beta-delayed fission, i.e. fission of {+178}Hg, eight events were assigned to this decay mode, and six |g rays were detected in prompt coincidence with these events. 
J$ possible configuration=|p3s{-1/2}{+-1}~#|n1h{-9/2} (2013Li49) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%A Only |a decay has been observed. Theory predicts a partial T{-1/2} of 0.7 s (1997Mo25), implying %|a|?70. 
J from J|p(g.s.) systematics for heavier odd-A Tl isotopes. 
T from 6569|a(t) (1998To14). Others: 0.42 s {I6} (2002Ro17, 6568|a), 0.43 s {I35} (1996Pa01, 6568|a), 0.16 s {I+9-4} (1983Sc24, 6560|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%A Only |a decay has been observed. 
E |>659; see comment above concerning |a decay from {+179}Tl. 
T weighted average of 1.7 ms {I2} (2002Ro17, 7201|a(t)), 1.8 ms {I4} (1998To14, 7213|a(t)), 1.6 ms {I8} (1998To14, 7096|a(t)), 0.7 ms {I+6-4} (1996Pa01, 7201|a(t)) and 1.4 ms {I5} (1983Sc24, 7200|a(t)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ Branching ratio determined using %|a=75 {I3} for {+179}Hg decay; {+179}Hg is |b daughter of {+179}Tl decay. 
T$ from time distribution of 6560|a peak (ISOLDE-CERN data); and time distribution between recoil implantations and subsequent |a decays (Er-6561|a-6433|a triple correlation) at SHIP-GSI. Value is weighted average of 263 ms {I17} (ISOLDE-CERN) and 267 ms {I13} (SHIP-GSI) (2013An10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+)
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2017Ba04). Dominant configuration=|p3s{-/2}{+-1} 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+179}Tl)=-12900 MHz {I290} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+179}Tl)=-1.274 fm{+2} {I29}(stat) {I89}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 2010An13. Others: 1.1 s {I2} (2013KoZR), 0.94 s {I25} (2013El08, from |b-delayed fission(t)), 1.5 s {I2} (1998To14), 0.97 s {I+9-8} (1987La23), 1.9 s {I9} (1993BoZK), and 0.70 s {I+12-9} (1987La23) 
J$direct feeding to 4+ and 6+ states in {+180}Hg; proposed configuration of |p3s{-1/2} coupled with |n1h{-9/2} (2013KoZR,2011El07). 
%EC+%B+,%A$from 2010An13 
%A$other: 7 {I5} from 2003An27 
%ECSF$from 2013El08. Others: 3.6|*10{+-3} {I7} (2010An13, earlier analysis of same data in 2013El08), |?1.0|*10{+-4} from 1987La23 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J$2017Ba04 analyzed their data assuming J=4 and 5 as proposed in literature, however, the authors favor J=4 based on a comparison of measured magnetic moment with configurations of |p3s{-1/2}~#|n1h{-9/2} or |p3s{-1/2}~#|n2f{-7/2}; former configuration is expected to be dominant for {+180}Tl g.s. Note that J|p=(5-), arising from the same configuration, in {+180}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Feb 2015 update) 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+180}Tl)=-12730 MHz {I220} for J=5, and -12680 MHz {I220} for J=4 (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+180}Tl)=-1.254 fm{+2} {I22}(stat) {I88}(syst) for J=4 (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$From the systematics of the {+183-197}Tl isotopes, a 1/2+ and 9/2- isomer pair is expected. 
T$from {+181}Tl |a-decay (1998To14). Other: 3.4 s {I6} from {+181}Tl |a-decay (1984ScZQ) 
$E|a=6578 {I10} from 1998To14; E|a=6566 {I20} from 1984ScZQ. Q(|a)=6724 {I9} calculated from E(|a), disagrees with Q(|a)=6324 {I9} from 2003Au03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$From 2009An14. 
T$from 2009An14. Others: 1.4 ms {I5} (1998To14), 2.7 ms {I10} (1984ScZQ) 
$E|a=6186 {I10} from 1998To14; E|a=6180 from 1993BoZK 
E$The 9/2- to 9/2- |a-decay energy systematics of odd Bi isotopes predicts a 7280 keV peak, but it could not be identified in 2004An07, due to other signals of similar energies. 
J$From the systematics of the {+183-197}Tl isotopes, a 1/2+ and 9/2- isomer pair is expected. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+)
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2017Ba04). Dominant configuration=|p3s{-/2}{+-1} 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+181}Tl)=-11890 MHz {I160} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+181}Tl)=-1.174 fm{+2} {I16}(stat) {I82}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%A$from comparison of the number of detected {+181}Tl and {+181}Hg alpha decays corrected by the branching of {+181}Hg which was taken as %|a=27 % {I2}. 
T$from |a(t) selecting events belonging to the high-energy side of of the {+177}Au and {+181}Tl peaks (E|a=6180-6225 keV) (2018Cu04). 
${+181}Tl was found to decay with E|a=6183 {I7} (2018Cu04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%A$|<5 (1997Ba21), <4 (1993BoZK), <5 (1991Bo22); no |a observed by 1997Ba21 following decay of {+186}Bi |a decay. 1986Ke03 reported E|a=6406 {I10}, in disagreement with E|a=6050 from 1993BoZK. In a recent communication (e-mail reply of July 16, 2015, from C. Van Beveren, KU, Leuven, Belgium), the evaluator learned that a paper on the |a decay of {+182},{+184}Tl is forthcoming from the experiments by the Leuven group at ISOLDE-CERN facility 
T$from decay curve for |g rays (1991Bo22). Others: 2.8 s {I6} from decay curve for 6050|a and 2.0 s {I3} from decay curve for |b radiation (1993BoZK). Theoretical values of |b-decay half-life of 3.88 s and |a-decay half-life of 26.9 s (1997Mo25) suggest %|a|?13% 
J$possible |b feeding of 8+ state in {+182}Hg; syst of neighboring thallium nuclides 
$2003An27 also do not have much evidence for |a decay from {+182}Tl and do not confirm 6406|a from 1986Ke03 and 6050|a from 1993BoZK 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J$possible configuration=|p3s{-1/2}~#|n1h{-9/2}, same as that for {+180}Tl g.s. Measured magnetic moment is consistent with (4-) state in {+180}Tl 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+182}Tl)=-11340 MHz {I180} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+182}Tl)=-1.120 fm{+2} {I18}(stat) {I78}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
E$note that this level was labeled as ground state in {+182}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (July 2015 update) 
J$measured magnetic moment is consistent with (7+) states in heavier Tl nuclei 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+182}Tl)=-11370 MHz {I310} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+182}Tl)=-1.123 fm{+2} {I30}(stat) {I78}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1 HFA correction included. 
|D<r{+2}>=-1.056 {I74} (2013Ba41). Systematic uncertainty (due to scaling uncertainties of electronic factor and specific mass shift) is shown here; the statistical uncertainty (arising from isotope shift uncertainties) is 28 (2013Ba41). 
For isotope shift for 276.9 nm transition and magnetic hfs constants, see 2013Ba41. 
%|e+%|b{++}: |e decay observed (1992BoZO,1992BlZW,1999Ba45). 
J from systematics of heavier odd-A Tl isotopes. 
T from K| x ray(Hg)(t) (1992BoZO,1992BlZW). Other: 6.9 s {I14} from accumulation of |a line from {+183}Hg |a decay following {+183}Tl |e decay (1992BoZO). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E from E|g in {+187}Bi |a decay (38 ms). 
J E is consistent with energy systematics for (|p d{-3/2}){+-1} levels in {+185}Tl through {+201}Tl (E=285 to 385) (2001Mu26); population in {+187}Bi |a decay (38 ms) is consistent with observations for h{-9/2} to d{-3/2} transitions from heavier odd-A Bi isotopes (1999Ba45). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%A from 2006An11. Other: |?1.5, tentative value based on one correlated 7000|a({+187}Bi)-6380|a({+183}Tl) event (1999Ba45). Decays by 6333?|a, 6384|a and 6456|a (2006An11). 
%IT from systematics, this level would be expected to deexcite via an E3 transition to the d{-3/2} state, but such a transition has yet to be identified. 
E from private communication from A.N. Andreyev to 2011Ve01, uncertainty unstated by 2011Ve01 in {+187}Bi |a decay (38 ms). E=625 {I7} from energy difference between |a group feeding this state and that feeding the g.s.. 
T from {+144}Sm({+42}Ca,p2n|g):E=195 MeV (2004Ra28; |a-recoil(t)). Other: 60 ms 15 from {+183}Tl |a decay (1980Sc09). 
J allowed |a decay from (9/2-) {+187}Bi; supported by systematics of heavier odd-A Tl isotopes (see 2001Mu26). Probable configuration=(|p h{-9/2}); oblate state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J Possible (|p h{-11/2}){+-1} bandhead (2001Mu26), based on energy systematics for heavier odd-A Tl isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T from spectrum of time difference between detection of recoil and 347|g in ({+42}Ca,p2n|g):E=209 MeV. Other: 1.3 |ms {I4} from ({+42}Ca,p2n|g):E=209 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
E from private communication from A.N. Andreyev to authors of 2011Ve01, uncertainty unstated by 2011Ve01. E=625 {I7} from energy difference between |a group feeding this state and that feeding the g.s.. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E level energy fixed at adopted value for least-squares fit. 
T From exponential fit to time difference between pairs of recoils and |a decays, assuming exponential background (2004Ra28) 
$Three |a groups observed by 2004Ra28 from the decay of 9/2- isomer with E|a (relative I|a): 6330 {I10} (78 {I9}); 6384 {I16} (16 {I4}); 6456 {I15} (4 {I2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T from spectrum of time difference between detection of recoil and 347|g. Other: 1.3 |ms {I4} from recoil-69|g time spectrum. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2017Ba04). Dominant configuration=|p3s{-/2}{+-1} 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+183}Tl)=-10460 MHz {I160} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+183}Tl)=-1.033 fm{+2} {I15}(stat) {I72}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+183}Tl)=-7960 MHz {I160} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+183}Tl)=-0.775 fm{+2} {I15}(stat) {I54}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T weighted average of 9.7 s {I6} from |a(t) and |b(t) (1993BoZK), 10 s {I2} from both 6162|a(t) and 5988|a(t), and 11 s {I2} from |g(t) following |e decay (1976To06), and 11 s {I1} (1976Co24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
J likely configuration: |p 3s{-1/2}{+-1} ~# |n 1i{-13/2} (2003An26); systematics for heavier odd-odd Tl isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J E1 117.5|g from (3+) 117.5+y; systematics for heavier odd-odd Tl isotopes. Likely configuration: |p 3s{-1/2}{+-1} ~# |n 3p{-3/2} (2003An26). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J unhindered |a decay from (3+) {+188}Bi. Likely configuration: |p 1h{-9/2} ~# |n 3p{-3/2} (2003An26). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
E from energy difference between |a feeding this level and that feeding 0.0+x level in {+188}Bi |a decay (265 ms). 
J unhindered |a decay from (10-) {+188}Bi. Likely configuration: |p 1h{-9/2} ~# |n 1i{-13/2} (2003An26). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 2
level_comment:
MOMM1$with hyperfine structure anomaly (HFA) correction. Value without HFA correction is 0.316 {I98} 
$|d<r{+2}>({+184}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.995 fm{+2} {I30} {I70} (2013Ba41). First uncertainty is from uncertainties in isotope shifts, the second is systematic due to electronic factors and specific mass shift 
J$2- from systematics for g.s. (2012Au07). In ENSDF Adopted Levels, no J|p is given for g.s. but (2-) is listed for an isomer at 0+y 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 2016Va01: J. Phys. G43, 025102 
J$configuration=|p3s{-1/2}~#|n3p{-3/2} 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+184}Tl)=-9930 MHz {I320} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+184}Tl)=-0.979 fm{+2} {I32}(stat) {I69}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$from {+184}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Oct 2009 update), where it was assigned for the ground state 
J$comparison of measured magnetic moment with theoretical calculation using additivity relations supports the dominant configuration= |p3s{-1/2}~#|n1i{-13/2} with about 20% admixture of configuration= |p2d{-3/2}~#|n1i{-13/2}, but the authors note that the measured value of magnetic moment drops out of trend for 7+ states of other Tl nuclei 
J$configuration=|p3s{-1/2}~#|n1i{-13/2}, mixed with other configurations, as discussed by 2017Ba04 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+184}Tl)=-9890 MHz {I240} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+184}Tl)=-0.976 fm{+2} {I24}(stat) {I68}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E,T$from 2015Va10: Phys. Rev. C92, 014325 
J$comparison of measured magnetic moment with theoretical calculation using additivity relations supports the configuration= |p1h{-9/2}~#|n1i{-13/2}, but the authors note that the measured value of magnetic moment drops out of trend for 10- states of other Tl nuclei 
$|d|n({+205}Tl,{+184}Tl)=-7960 MHz {I210} (2017Ba04) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+184}Tl)=-0.777 fm{+2} {I20}(stat) {I54}(syst) (2017Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$From decay rate of K|a{-1}| x ray (Hg) (1993BoZK, 1991BoZV). Other value: 18 s {I2}, from growth and decay of {+185}Hg in a {+185}Tl source (1991BoZV). 
J analogy to other odd-A thallium isotopes suggests s{-1/2} assignment for the ground state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$%|a: If r{-0}=1.505 {I20} (based on r{-0}({+180}Pt)=1.512 {I11} and r{-0}({+182}Hg)=1.50 {I2} from 1998Ak04), T{-1/2}({+185}Tl)=1.93 s {I8}, Q(|a)=5744 {I50} (based on E|a=5976 {I4} from {+185}Tl(454.8 {I15}) to {+181}Au(90 {I50})), then HF(5976|a) between 1 and 4 implies %|a({+185}Tl) is of the order of 2 {I1}. However, the Q(|a) assumed here differs from Q(|a)=5690 {I50} (2003Au03). 
T$Weighted average of 2.0 s {I1} (1993BoZK), 1.7 s {I2} (1976To06), 1.8 s {I2} (1977Sc03), and 2.0 s {I2} (1980Sc09). 
J$168.8|g (E3) to (3/2+). Energy systematics of h{-9/2} states in odd-A thallium isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
MOMM1$with hyperfine structure anomaly (HFA) correction. Value without HFA correction is 1.608 {I38} 
$|d<r{+2}>({+185}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.938 fm{+2} {I41} {I66} (2013Ba41). First uncertainty is from uncertainties in isotope shifts, the second is systematic due to electronic factors and specific mass shift 
J$(1/2+) for {+185}Tl Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
MOMM1$with hyperfine structure anomaly (HFA) correction. Value without HFA correction is 3.78 {I21} 
$|d<r{+2}>({+185m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.731 fm{+2} {I29} {I51} (2013Ba41). First uncertainty is from uncertainties in isotope shifts, the second is systematic due to electronic factors and specific mass shift 
E$from Adopted Levels of {+185}Tl in ENSDF database 
J$(9/2-) for {+185}Tl Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E$2020St11 propose 2- state as the g.s. of {+186}Tl based on the measured E|a=5670~keV {I51} feeding the 129~keV level in {+182}Au and measured mass of the 7+ state in the literature. 
J E1 293.7|g from (3+) 
T$From |a-|g coin (t) (2020St11). Other: 4.16~s~{I10} (from |a(t) - possible |a contribution from 7+ state (27.5~s) - 2020St11 note). 
$%|a - 2020St11 identified |a=5670~keV {I51} decay from this level. Unable to extract the %|a branching due to poor energy resolution. 
$configuration=[|ps{-1/2}~@|ni{-3/2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$ Weighted ave. of 20~keV {I40} (2014Bo26, 2017Au03) from mass measurement, and 77 keV {I56} (2020St11) from |a decay studies. 
J Systematics of heavier odd-odd Tl isotopes. Probable configuration=((|p s{-1/2})+(|n i{-13/2})){-7+} (1981Kr20). 
T$From 1977Co21 (|g(t) - {+186}Tl |e decay). Other values: 27~s {I3} (1977Be23), 28 s {I2} (1975Ha27), 48 s {I3} (1974Ha10), 30~s~{I5} (1976To06), |J30~s (1976Ij01). 
%A$From 1977Ij01. 2020St11 also notes for evidences of small |a branch from this level. 
MOMM1,MOME2$From fast beam collinear laser spectroscopy (1995Sc54). |m measured relative to |m({+205}Tl) - not listed in 2020StZV. Also reported Q=0.06 {I10} (1995Sc54), does not include Sternheimer correction. N.J. Stone (2016St14) by email (dated: 01/21/21) opined that it fails the criterion for considering/listing. 
$|d<r{+2}>({+186m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.9324 fm{+2} {I15} (unc of iso. shift) {I650} (sys) (reported in 2013Ba41 based on data from 1995Sc54). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+,7+,8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J M1 89.5|g to (7+); absence of |g from (10-) isomer; possible configuration=((|p 3s{-1/2})-(|n i{-13/2})){-6+} (based on expected E splitting for 3s{-1/2}-i{-13/2} doublet (1991Va04)) favors J|p=6+. 
T$From {+190}Bi |a decay: high spin (1991Va04) 
E$ See level 414 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J From systemtics of heavier odd-odd Tl isotopes. Unhindered |a decay from (3+) parent. Possible configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})-(|n 3p{-3/2})){-3+} (1991Va04). 
T$From {+190}Bi |a decay: low spin (1991Va04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E Other: 390 {I40} (2021Ko07) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+186m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.719 fm{+2} {I23} (unc of iso. shift) {I50} (sys) (2013Ba41). 
E$x=77~keV~{I56} (2020St11) yields isomeric level energy of 451~keV~{I56} and 396~keV {I39} from mass measurement in 2014Bo26, 2017Au03. Wt. ave. 414~keV~{I39} (uncertainty is the lowest input value). 
J from systematics, E3 to (7+); unhindered |a decay from (10-) parent. J=10 gives good agreement between measured 2.55(6) and calculated and calculated 2.27 {I1} magnetic moment (2013Ba41). For details of the calculation see (2013Ba41, 2012Ba32, 1986Ul02). Possible configuration=({+}|p h{-9/2})(|n i{-13/2})10- 
T$Wt. ave. of data from {+186}Tl IT decay: 3.40~s~{I9} (2020St11), 3~s {I1} (1977Be23), 4.5 s {I13} (1977Co21), 4.5 s {I+10-15} (1975Ha27), and ({+32}S,5n|g),({+35}Cl,4n|g): 2.9 s {I2} (1981Kr20). 
MOMM1$Laser spectroscopy - with hyperfine structure anomaly (HFA) correction. Value without HFA correction is 2.568 {I61} (2013Ba41,2019StZV). 
$%IT and %|e+%|b{++} from 2020St11 
$configuration=[|ph{-9/2}~@|ni{-13/2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From Adopted Levels. Others: 3.40~s~{I9} (374|g(t), ce(t) - 2020St11), 3~s {I1} (374|g(t) - 1977Be23), 4.5~s {I13} (374|g(t) - 1977Co21), and 4.5~s {I+10-15} (374|g(t) - 1975Ha27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from |a|g(t) (2020St11) using all |g's from the decay of the (2-) except the 104-keV transition. Other: 4.16 s {I10} from |a's with energies between 6.4 and 6.5 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from exponential fit of K-ce and 374|g(t) (2020St11). 
%EC+%B+$from comparison of |g-rays in {+186}Hg to those from IT decays (2020St11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
MOMM1$From 1992Sc25 (collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy); {+205}Tl standard. |m consistent with that expected for a pure |p s{-1/2} shell-model configuration (1992Sc25). Same value in 2005St24. 
J systematics of heavier odd-A Tl isotopes; supported by |m. 
T the decay of {+187}Tl g.s. to {+187}Hg was observed by 1980WoZP. T{-1/2} should be considered preliminary (private communication). 
%A$Estimated by the evaluator using |a t, calculated by 1997Mo25. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From {+191}Bi |a decay (12.4 s) 
MOMM1,MOME2$both from 1992Sc25 (collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy). |m is consistent with that expected for a pure |p h{-9/2} shell model configuration (1992Sc25). 
J systematics of heavier odd-A Tl isotopes; supported by |m. 
T from 1981Mi12 in {+187}Tl IT decay. Other values: 18 s {I3} (1976To06), 16 s {I1} (1977Sc03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T$Estimated from 191 and 201 keV |g-t. Possible contamination of the 191 and 201 keV lines from {+184}Ir and {+187}Ir is noted (({+32}S,4n|g)-2000By02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-,27/2,29/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J From possible mult E1,M1 and E2 of 478.2|g 
T From gated 286+366+479 keV |g-t (({+32}S,4n|g)-2000By02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
Note that adopted |p=+ for this level; also, the adopted band assignment differs from that in 1994Re02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
E the adopted order for the 285 and 392 cascade gammas is reversed in 1994Re02; the adopted E(level) is, thus, 1453 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
E this level is assigned to a 1/2[530] band in adopted levels. Additionally, the adopted order for the 374 and 404 cascade gammas is the reverse of that in 1994Re02, and the resulting adopted level at 1465 keV is assigned to the 1/2[660] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
Level not adopted; a 362.7|g (here 360.6) is placed elsewhere in the other (HI,xn|g) studies. The 734.1|g of this dataset from this level is absent in other (HI,xn|g) studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 33/2-
level_comment:
The adopted energy for the level deexcited by the 601|g is 3512 because, there, the 601|g is placed to directly feed the 2908 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E From 2000By02. 
T Estimated from 191 and 201 keV |g-t. Possible contamination of the 191 and 201 keV lines from {+184}Ir and {+187}Ir is noted (2000By02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1$ hyperfine structure with HFA correction (2012Ba32). Previous value=3.7932 {I65} (1992Sc25) without the HFA correction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+187m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.616 {I31} {I43} (2013Ba41). First uncertainty is from uncertainties in isotope shifts, the second is systematic due to electronic factors and specific mass shift 
E$from Adopted Levels of {+187}Tl in ENSDF database 
J$(9/2-) in Adopted Levels of {+187}Tl in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$Systematics of neighboring odd-odd Tl nuclides (A=190-204). Possible |e feeding of low-spin states (J|<4) in {+188}Hg supports this assignment 
T$From 824.5|be{+-}(t), 0+ to 0+ transition in {+188}Hg (1984Co17, 1978CoYZ and 1976Ha25). 
CONF$ |ps{-1/2}~#|np{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$|D<r{+2}>({+205}Tl-{+188}Tl)=-0.78 fm{+2} {I9} (1992Me07). Other hyperfine structure measurements: 1990Di09, 1992Bu17, 1992Sc25 
MOMM1,MOME2$Collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07). Q value is also adopted in 2016St14. 
E$From ((10{+-}),{+192}Bi)=140 keV {I30} (2017Au03) and E|a=6348 keV {i5} to the 7+ isomeric state and E|a=6245 keV {i5} to the (2-) ground state in {+192}Bi |a decay (39.6 s) 
J$J from laser spectroscopy (1992Me07); |p from |m and systematics in odd-odd thallium isotopes. The experimental |m(exp)=+0.483 {I8} compares well with value of 0.471 deduced using the additivity rule (1992Me07) 
T$Weighted average of 73 s {I2} using 772.4|b|g(t), 6+ to 4+ transition in {+188}Hg and 70 s {I2} using 504.3|b|g(t), 6+ to 4+ transition in {+188}Hg (1984Co17,1978CoYZ and 1976Ha25). Other: 84 s {I30} (1970Va27) 
CONF$ |ps{-1/2}~#|ni{-13/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$103.1|g M1 to 7+ in {+192}Bi |a decay (39.6 s) (1991Va04). 
T$|a|g(t) in {+192}Bi |a decay (39.6 s) (1991Va04) 
CONF$ |ps{-1/2}~#|ni{-13/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$184.6|g E1 to (2-); favored decay from {+192}Bi |a decay (J|p=(3+)). Note that (1-) is tentatively proposed by 1981To02 in {+192}Bi |a decay 
CONF$|ph{-9/2}~#|np{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$268.8|g M2 to 7+ in (HI,xn|g) (1981Kr20) 
T$From |g(t) in (HI,xn|g) (1981Kr20) 
CONF$|ph{-9/2}~#|ni{-13/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$M1 33.6|g to 9-. Favoured |a decay from (10-) in {+192}Bi to this state. 
T$|a|g(t) in {+192}Bi |a decay (39.6 s) (1991Va04) 
CONF$|ph{-9/2}~#|ni{-13/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From ((10{+-}),{+192}Bi)=140 keV {I30} (2017Au03) and E|a=6348 keV {i5} to the 7+ level and E|a=6245 keV 5 to the (2-) ground state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$184.6|g E1 to (2-); favored decay from {+192}Bi |a decay (J|p=(3+)) 
T$From |a|g(t) in 1991Va04 
CONF$|ph{-9/2}~#|np{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$ suggested by model calculations, expected configuration=|p1/2[400] (prolate) (2009Sa09); favored |a decay from {+193}Bi |a decay (3.2 s) with parent J|p=(1/2+) 
T$from 1976Ha25 (also 1974Ha10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$RMS charge radius (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=5.424 fm {I6} (2004An14,evaluation). The evaluators assume that this value corresponds to the isomer in {+189}Tl and not the g.s. No value is listed in the recent evaluation by 2013An02 
MOMM1$hyperfine structure with HFA correction (2012Ba32). Other value: +3.878 {I6} (1987Bo44, collinear fast atomic beam laser spectroscopy) 
MOME2$collinear fast atomic beam laser spectroscopy (1987Bo44, also 1987Bi08, 1986BoZY thesis, 1985Bo46). Other: 1992ScZU 
E$ from {+193}Bi |a-decay (1985Co06). Value of 258 keV proposed in 1996RiZZ on the basis of interconnecting |g rays between the high-spin and low-spin structure is proven incorrect by 2009Sa09 in their |g|g coin data from {+182}Pb |e decay, where several |g rays were observed similar to the ones in the in-beam study of 1996RiZZ 
J$suggested by model calculations, expected configuration=|p9/2[505] (oblate) (2009Sa09); favored |a decay from {+193}Bi |a decay (63.6 s) with parent J|p=(9/2-) 
%IT$from B(M4)(W.u.)<10 (RUL). 
T$from 1976Ha25 (also 1974Ha10). Other: 1.4 min {I4} (1972Va12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$|g to (1/2+); model calculation, expected configuration=|p1/2[400] (prolate) (2009Sa09) 
E$ a level of this energy was also seen by 1996RiZZ. However the |g transition establishing this level and subsequent band appears to have been based on coincidences not confirmed in |b decay study (2009Sa09). The placement of the deexciting |g is also not confirmed in 2009Sa09 due to lack of evidence from |g|g coincidence data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$ gammas to (7/2-) and (11/2-); model calculation, expected configuration=|p11/2[505] (prolate) (2009Sa09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E1 |g to (11/2-); |g to (13/2-); model calculation, expected configuration=|p13/2[606] (oblate) (2009Sa09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Q{-t}=1.1 {I1} (2007Ch41) 
J$ E2 |g to (13/2+); (M1) |g to (15/2+); band member. Note that log| {Ift}=6.79 from (13/2+) parent is too low for a |DJ=2, |D|p=no |b transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, (M1) |g to (15/2+); |g to (13/2+); band member. Note that log| {Ift}=6.98 from (13/2+) parent is too low for a |DJ=2, |D|p=no |b transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$ |DJ=1, (M1) |g to (17/2-). J|p was proposed as (21/2-) in 1991Po15 (also in 2007Ch41), based on |DJ=2, Q assignment in 1991Po15. But in 1995Re18, the 502 transition is proposed as a stretched dipole based on DCO ratios for the cascading 303 and 199 transitions, parallel to the 502 transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$ from Adopted Levels, see the comments therein 
T$From Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$ 257.6 keV proposed in 1996RiZZ for the (9/2-) isomer based on connection of high-spin states to low-spin states is not confirmed by |e decay study of 2009Sa09 from their |g|g coincidence data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,T$from Adopted Levels based on |a decay studies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Q{-t}=2.5 {I3} (2007Ch41) with assumed E2 for 502.0|g 
J$ proposed as (21/2-) in 1991Po15 and 2007Ch41. In 1996RiZZ and 1995Re18, it is proposed as (19/2-) from stretched dipole character of 502|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$rearrangement of the 502-664-502 cascade as 664-502-502 in Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset defines a level at 1645, instead of the 1484 level here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$spin from laser spectroscopy (1992Me07), parity from E1 |g from 1+. Possible configuration=|ps{-1/2}~#|np{-3/2} 
MOMM1,MOME2$Collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07) 
T$from 1976Bi09 (also 1974Ha10). Other: 2.9 min {I2} (1970Va27) 
$%|e|?60, %|b{++}|?40 (from decay scheme). 
$Evaluated rms charge radius=5.4121 fm {I56} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl,{+190}Tl)=-0.6693 fm{+2} {I3} (2013An02) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl-{+190}Tl)=-0.7063 fm{+2} {I4} {I490}(syst) (2013Ba41); first uncertainty is from isotope shift, the second uncertainty is systematic from the scaling uncertainty of the specific mass shift. 
$|d<r{+2}>({+205}Tl-{+190}Tl)=-0.68 fm{+2} {I8} (1990Di09) 
$Isotope shift: |D|n({+205}Tl-{+190}Tl)=-7040 MHz {I240} (2013Ba41) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
E$from measured mass excess=-24289.3 {I64} for the 7+ isomer (2013St25,2014Bo26) and mass excess=-24372 {I8} for the g.s. (2017Wa10), as also given in 2017Au03. Others: 89 {I12} (2013St25), 63 {I10} (2019Gh11, deduced from known |a-decay energies from previous work in 1991Va04). 
J$spin from laser spectroscopy (1992Me07), parity from agreement of measured magnetic moment with semiempirical estimated value of 0.471 (1992Me07) for |ps{-1/2}~#|ni{-13/2} configuration. Also systematic occurrence of the 7+ isomer in odd-odd thallium isotopes. 
T$weighted average of 3.6 min {I3} (2013St25); 3.7 min {I3} (1976Bi09, also 1974Ha10); 3.4 min {I2} (1975Va20, 3.9 min {I3} in 1970Va27, also 1970FeZY). In the averaging procedure, uncertainty increased to 0.3 min in 1975Va20 
MOMM1,MOME2$Collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy (CFBLS) (1992Me07). Other: |m=+0.495 {I4} (1987Bo44, CFBLS method) 
$%|e|?65, %|b{++}|?35 (from decay scheme). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+205}Tl-{+190m}Tl)=-0.7223 fm{+2} {I5} {I510}(syst) (2013Ba41); first uncertainty is from isotope shift, the second uncertainty is systematic from the scaling uncertainty of the specific mass shift 
$|D<r{+2}>({+205}Tl-{+190}Tl)=-0.69 fm{+2} {I8} (1990Di09) 
$Isotope shift: |D|n({+205}Tl-{+190m}Tl)=-7380 MHz {I180} (2013Ba41) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$from |a|g(t) (1991Va04) 
J$E1 |g to 2- 
E$this level may be the same as 151.31 populated in {+190}Pb |e decay, but opposite parities are suggested from the mult(151.3|g)=E1 in {+194}Bi |a decay (1991Va04) and mult(151.19|g)=(M1,E2) in {+190}Pb |e decay (1981El03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) (1981Kr20) 
E$proposed by the evaluators, where x is likely to be low energy 
$1991Va04 (from study of {+194}Bi |a decay) suggest that the placement of 161.9|g from this isomer is incorrect for the following reasons: no (10-) to (8-) |a transition observed, no coincidences observed between 5598|a and 5660|a with a possible (9-) to (8-) M1 |g transition, and E1 hindrance factor of 161.9|g is high by three to four orders of magnitude, as compared to those for neighboring Tl nuclides 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT;ISO=M3
level_comment:
E$level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
T$estimated by 1991Va04 in {+194}Bi |a decay from lack of |a|g-coin, and non-observation of gamma de-excitation from this level to lower levels, although a gamma ray with <10 keV cannot be excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E$level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
E$from difference of |a groups to (9-) and 201.2 levels 
T$estimated by 1991Va04 in {+194}Bi |a decay from lack of |a|g-coin, and non-observation of gamma de-excitation from this level to lower levels, although a gamma ray with <10 keV cannot be excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,J$isomer from 1981Kr20 only, considered as uncertain by evaluators. In the Adopted dataset, isomer is tentatively placed from a level of unknown energy decaying possibly by a low-energy (highly converted) transition to the 245 level. Existence of this isomer in {+190}Tl needs to be confirmed 
T$from |g(t) with beam pulses (1981Kr20) 
E$1991Va04 (from {+194}Bi |a decay) suggest that the placement of 161.9|g from this level is incorrect. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
%|e+%|b{++}=?,%|a=? 
J populated in {+195}Bi(J|p=1/2+) unhindered |a decay (87 s). J|p=1/2+ g.s. occurs in heavier odd-A Tl isotopes. 
T Unobserved activity. T{-1/2}=20 min in NUBASE (2021Ko17) from systematics. 
RMS charge radius: 5.414 fm {i7} (2004An14) 
Isotope shift (IS): |D<r{+2}>=-0.627 fm{+2} {i66} (1992Me07), with respect to {+205}Tl. 2013Ba41 list |D<r{+2}>=-0.6544 {I7} (stat) {I460} (syst) from 1992Me07. 
MOMM1 From 2019StZV, 1992Me07 - collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E From 2021Ko07 - NUBASE. Also 297 keV {i7} in {+195}Bi |a decay (183 s) (1985Co06). 
J atomic beam (1984Be40). Energy systematics of the 9/2- state in A=183-193 odd-mass Tl isotopes. Configuration: |p (h{-9/2}){+1} (2013Ba41). 
T From 1974Va19, based on several |g(t) (earlier value 5.2 min {i4} (1970FeZU) - same research group). Other values: 5.42 min {i30} (1988WoZZ), 5.8 min {i5} (1975UnZZ), 6 min {i1} (1974ZgZY). 
%|e+%|b{++}=100 %|e=98.2 {I+6-17}, %|b{++}=1.8 {I+17-6} (1974Ma14). Other:%|b{++}<3 (1974Va19). 
MOMM1 From 2019StZV, 2012Ba32 (Resonance ionization spectroscopy). Others: +3.903 {I3} (1987Bo44 - collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy), 3.880 {i7} (1992Me07 - collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy). 
MOME2 From 2016St14, 1992Me07 - collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy. Others: 2.28 eb {I3} (1987Bo44 - collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (no Sternheimer correction)), -2.27 eb {I3} (1985Bo46). 
Isotope shift (IS): |D<r{+2}>=-0.471 fm{+2} {i56} (1992Me07), with respect to {+205}Tl. 2013Ba41 list |D<r{+2}>=-0.4899 {I6} (IS unc) {I340} (sys. unc) referring from 1992Me07. Others: -0.43 fm{+2} {i5} (1987Bo44) listed in previous evaluation (2007Va21) most likely based on reported IS -8.265 GHz {I65} (1987Bo44) with respect to {+205}Tl. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
E from {+191}Pb |e decay. Other: 341 keV {i7} from {+195}Bi (87 s) |a decay. 
J from systematic trends for the 3/2+ state in {+185-201}Tl odd-A nuclei, which indicate an energy in the range of about 330-350 keV for the 3/2+ level in {+191}Tl (see e.g. 1981Mi11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
J J|?(23/2+), from 1998Re04, in (HI,xn|g):SD dataset. See also 1992Ha35 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
T from 1974Va19. 
E from {+195}Bi (183 s) |a decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E From E|a=5422 keV {I5} and Q|a({+195}Bi). 297 keV {I7} (2021Ko07 - NUBASE). 
J from 9/2- level systematics (1985Co06); HF of |a-transition from 9/2- state in {+195}Bi; configuration=|p(h{-9/2}) (1985Co06, and references therein). 
T From Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E$From 2021Ko07 - NUBASE. Also 297 keV {i7} in {+195}Bi |a decay (183 s). 
T From Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+192}Tl-{+205}Tl)=-0.60 {I7} (1992Me07). 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=5.416 {I7} (2004An14). 
MOMM1 collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07); value relative to |m=+1.63821461 {I12} for {+205}Tl. 
MOME2 collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy; -0.328 {I11} from 1992Me07, increased by evaluator by 2% (Sternheimer correction). 
T weighted average of 9.4 min {I2} (1979To06,1981So09) and 10.6 min {I5} (1975Va20). Others: 1961An03, 1963Di10, 1968Pe13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
E since the 251|g from the (8-) isomer is coincident with most transitions reported by 1996RiZZ in {+160}Gd({+37}Cl,5n|g), the 217+x isomer must have been strongly populated in that study even though no linking transition between it and the 237+x level fed by the 83|g (or the 0.0+x level) has been observed; thus, K is at least 6~h to 8~h for levels observed in ({+37}Cl,5n|g) above the 217+x level. If the E=491 {I40} level fed in |a decay: high spin is synonymous with the 320.4+x level from ({+37}Cl,5n|g) then x=171 {I40}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+192}Tl-{+205}Tl)=-0.61 {I7} (1992Me07). 
MOMM1 collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy (1989Ra17, from 1987Bo44); value relative to |m=+1.62225787 {I12} for {+203}Tl and |m=+1.63821461 {I12} for {+205}Tl. Other value: +0.502 {I8} (collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy, 1992Me07). 
MOME2 from collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy; +0.464 {I20} from 1992Me07, increased by evaluator by 2% (Sternheimer correction). 
E from E|g=250.6 from 217+x 20, assuming x=171 {I40}. 
J possible configuration: (s{-1/2}i{-13/2})7+ (1991Va04); supported by |m (1992Me07). 
T from 1975Va20 (10.8 min {I2}), 1981So09 (10.8 min {I3}). Others: 1961An03, 1963Di10, 1968Pe13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
E from Q(|a) and measured E|a in {+196}Bi |a decay: low spin. 
J based on |a hindrance (HF=1.6 {I8}) from (3+) parent in {+196}Bi |a decay: low spin. Possible |a-parent configuration is (|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 3p{-3/2})3+ (1991Va04); other members of this intruder multiplet have not yet been identified. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_comment:
J (M1) 83|g from (10-) 320+x level. Level also proposed in (O,xn|g) study to allow for possible missed level(s) between the level deexcited by the 250.6|g and that deexcited by the 83|g; J=9 favored by analogy with neighboring higher-mass Tl isotopes (1988Hu03). 
Probably deexcited by an unobserved E|g<40 transition, analogous to higher A isotopes of Tl (1980Kr02, 1988Hu03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
E 491 {I40} from E(5112|a) in {+196}Bi |a decay: high spin and Q(|a), assuming E=271 {I5} for the (10-) isomer in {+196}Bi. Thus, x=171 {I40}, provided that this is indeed the level fed in |a decay: high spin. 
J |a decay from (10-) in {+196}Bi |a decay: high spin is probably allowed (HF=3.1 {I14}). Possible |a-parent configuration is (|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 1i{-13/2})10- (1991Va04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
MOMM1 differential perturbed angular distributions (1989Ra17, from 1982Da17); value relative to |m=3.607 {I8} for {+19}F(197 level). 
MOME2 estimate from differential perturbed angular distributions (1989Ra17, from 1982Sc27); other estimate: 0.42 {I7} (differential perturbed angular distributions, 1983Ma79). 
E (237+x-z)=217+x 20, where 0|<z|<40 keV (1991Va04) and x=171 {I40}; z represents the energy of an unobserved transition from an expected level lying between the level deexcited by the 250.6|g and the one deexcited by the 83|g. 
J (E1) 251|g to (7+) 138; J expected to increase with energy in (HI,xn|g) reactions. Analogous to 8- isomers known in higher A Tl isotopes. 
T from |g|g(t) in (O,xn|g) (1982Da17). Other values: 272 ns {I10} (|g|g(t), 1980Kr02) in (O,xn|g); 313 ns {I44} (2004Gl04, 2003Gl05) from fragment-|g(t) in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
E from E(5153|a) and Q(|a). E=180 {I40} proposed in evaluation by 2003Au02. 
J from 1991Va04, based on low HF for |a decay from (3+) {+196}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
E from E(5112|a) and Q(|a), assuming E=271 {I5} for the (10-) isomer in {+196}Bi. 
J from 1991Va04; based on low HF for |a decay from (10-) {+196}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T |g|g(t) (1982Da17). Other value: 272 ns {I10} (|g|g(t), 1980Kr02). 
g-factor=+0.207 {I5} (1982Da17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Represents possible J=9 and/or 10 member(s) of expected (|p h{-9/2})~#(|n i{-13/2}) multiplet. 1980Kr02 postulate that highly converted, E|g|<40 keV transition(s) analogous to a transition known in {+196}Tl may occur between the cascading 83|g and the delayed 250.6|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
J 11- favored by 1980Kr02; adopted value is (10-) based on the presumption that this is the level fed in {+196}Bi |a decay: high spin. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J+6
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Band assignment and deexciting |g unconfirmed in {+160}Gd({+37}Cl,5n|g) (1996RiZZ), so level is not adopted. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,J from Adopted Levels (217+x level, assuming x=171 {I40}). 
T from fragment-|g(t). E|g unstated; presumably the known 251|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
E see comment on E(237+x level). 
J from Adopted Levels. 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E,J from Adopted Levels. 
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment; it has a 45 keV uncertainty that has not been included here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E,T from Adopted Levels (217+x level, with x=171; |DE=45). 
E since the 251|g from the 8- isomer is in cascade with most transitions reported by 1996RiZZ, it is clear that the isomer has been strongly populated even though no direct link to the isomer was identified. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
Limit for possible |a decay: <2|*10{+-4}% (1963Ka17). 1961Fo06 assign a 5800-keV |a group to either {+193}Tl or {+194}Tl. 
MOMM1 from collinear fast atom beam laser spectroscopy (1987Bo44,2014StZZ). 
J$J from atomic beam (1976Ek03); parity from shell model, |m. (3s1/2 level is the only J=1/2 level available for Z=81). 
T$weighted average of 22.6 min {i10} (1961An03) and 21.0 min {i8} (1974Va23). Other values: 30 min {i3} (1960Ch05), 25 min {i3} (1963Di10). 
Isotope shift: |D<r{+2}> =-0.465 {i55} fm{+2}, relative to {+205}Tl (1989MeZZ) 
RMS charge radius: 5.4302 {i58} fm (2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1 From 1987Bo44,2014StZZ: collinear fast atom beam laser spectroscopy. Other value: +3.82 {i3} (2014StZZ,2012Ba32). 
MOME2 From 1987Bo44,2014StZZ: collinear fast atom beam laser spectroscopy. 
E x<13 from IT decay 
J$Long half-life indicates high-spin state. From shell model and measured |m the g9/2 level is the only available level for Z=81 (one proton-hole nucleus). |m also agrees with near-prolate nucleus described by 9/2[505] with |b(2)=0.15, |b(4)=-0.02 and |g=-0.55|' (1992Re08). Systematics of {+191}Tl, {+195}Tl, {+197}Tl, {+199}Tl. 
T$from 1963Di10. 
%IT$deduced from relative I(|g+ce) values for transitions in {+193}Hg and {+193}Tl (1976GoZP). 
Isotope shift: |D<r{+2}> =-0.395 {i46} fm{+2}, relative to {+205}Tl (1989MeZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=V
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_comment:
E$3134 keV 4 depopulating from this state. Proposed feeding by 1998Bo20 does not fit to members of normal band of (HI,xn|g) 2016NdZZ. 
J$from 1998Bo20. Also from least-squares fits to E|g's using empirical expansions relating second moment of inertia and angular frequency 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=V;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_comment:
E$3113 keV 5 depopulating from this state. Proposed feeding by 1998Bo20 does not fit to members of normal band of (HI,xn|g) 2016NdZZ. 
J calculated J=19/2 (1992Wu01,1993Hu06,1994Zh40) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=V;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_comment:
E$3046 keV 6 depopulating from this state. Proposed feeding by 1998Bo20 does not fit to members of normal band of (HI,xn|g) 2016NdZZ. 
J calculated J=21/2 (1992Wu01,1993Hu06,1994Zh40) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%IT|<75, from {+193}Tl IT decay (2.11 min) (1976GoZP) 
T$from {+193}Tl IT decay (2.11 min) (1963Di10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$15/2+ in 1992Re03 
T$2016NdZZ estimate the value using Recoil Shadow Attenuation Method (RSAM) and list t{-1/2}=0.6 ns, however, used the term "lifetime". The evaluator assumes half-life. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=V
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_comment:
J$from 1998Bo20. Also from least-squares fits to E|g's using empirical expansions relating second moment of inertia and angular frequency 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$spin from atomic-beam method (1976Ek03); parity from shell-model assignment based on comparison of experimental and calculated |m. 
T$same value of 33.0 min {I5} is measured by 2003Su30 (|g-decay curve) and 1960Ju01 (decay curve for internal conversion lines). Others: 34 min {I2} (1976Ek03, decay curve for resonance in hyperfine structure measurements); 35.1 min {I10} (1968Pe13, |g-decay curve). Weighted average of all the four values is: 33.3 min {I5} 
MOMM1$from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07). Others: 0.14 {I1} from atomic beam magnetic resonance (1976Ek03). 
MOME2$from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07). 
$Evaluated rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.4259 fm {I46} (2013An02). 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+194}Tl, {+205}Tl)=-0.5261 {I5} (2013An02). Others: -0.531 fm{+2} {I63} (1992Me07), -0.5551 fm{+2} {I39}(stat){I50}(syst) (2013Ba41, re-analysis of isotope-shift data in 1992Me07 with the unified electronic parameters set). 
$Configuration=|ps{-1/2}~#|nf{-5/2}+|ps{-1/2}~#|np{-3/2} (1976Ek03,1984Be40). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0)-
level_comment:
J$192.0|g E2 to 2- and |e feeding from 0+ (log| {Ift}=6.6). Spin of 1- is considered unlikely since in that case the transition may be M1+E2 type rather than pure E2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
J$225.0|g M1(+E2) to 2- and 1294.4|g (E1) from 1+. Absence of |e feeding from 0+ favors J=2. Also in {+198}Tl, 2- and 3- levels at 259 and 275, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from mass difference of {+194g}Tl and {+194m}Tl masses, measured with ISOLTRAP (2013St25,2014Bo26). Other: |?250 from extrapolation of energies of 7+ isomers in {+196}Tl at 394.2 {I5} and {+198}Tl at 543.6 {I4} from their Adopted Levels. 
J$from systematics of 7+ isomers in {+196}Tl to {+204}Tl. 
T$from 1960Ju01, decay curves for conversion lines 
MOMM1$weighted average of +0.530 {I8} from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07) and 0.540 {I5} from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1987Bo44). Other measurements: 1990Di09, 1984Be40, 1975Ka17,1969Go21. 
MOME2$from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1992Me07). Other: 0.62 {I1} (1986BoZZ). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+194}Tl, {+205}Tl)=-0.525 fm{+2} 63 (1992Me07), -0.5481 fm{+2} {I5}(stat){I380}(syst) (2013Ba41, re-analysis of isotope-shift data in 1992Me07 with the unified electronic parameters set). 
$No IT decay (1972Am03,1960Ju01). No Tl K| x ray or L| x ray observed (1972Am03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
J$270.5|g M1(+E2) to 2-; no |e feeding from 0+ favors J=3. But the choices J=1,2 are not ruled out. Comparison with 2- and 3- levels in {+198}Tl at 259 and 275, respectively, suggests 2- for 225 level and 3- for 270 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$163.9|g M1+E2 to 1-, 367.8|g (M1(+E2)) to 2-, 175.7|g M1 to (0)-; |e feeding from 0+ (log| {Ift}=6.7). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$460.05|g (M1+E2) to 2-, 189.4|g (M1(+E2)) to (3)-; |e feeding from 0+ log| {Ift}=6.7 (log| {If{+1u}t}=7.8) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$589.1|g (M1(+E2)) to 2-, 318.69|g (M1(+E2)) to (3)-; |e feeding from 0+ log| {Ift}=7.1 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.2) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,J,T$from Adopted Levels. E(level)=0.0+x in 1979Kr09 and 2014Ma55. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$from mass measurement in 2013St25 (also 2014Bo26). The level energy kept fixed, without its uncertainty, in the least-squares adjustment procedure. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J optical spectroscopy and |m analysis (1976Fu06,1978LeZA). 
configuration=|p 1/2+[402] (1982Hi04) 
MOMM1$from {+205}Tl standard and optical spectroscopy (1969Go21). Others: measured |m=+1.66 {I13} for {+195}Tl-{+205}Tl J=1/2 g.s. (1976Ek03), +1.59 {I9} (1984Be40) 
T from |g(t) measurement (1961Ju06). Others: 1.2 h {I1} (1955Kn34, 1957An53), 1.13 h {I6} (1978Go15), 1.05 h {I6} (1977WeZM). 
Change of the mean-square charge radius |D<r{+2}>=-0.462 (fm){+2} 49 (1989MeZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J J=9/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,6n|g), |p from E3 |g to 3/2+ 
configuration=|p 9/2-[505] (1982Hi04) 
T from |g(t) measurement in {+195}Tl IT decay (3.6 s). 
MOMM1$ hyperfine structure with HFA correction (2012Ba32). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
E may correspond to E(level)=1619.1 (1982Hi04) 
Branching: I|g(428|g)/I|g(742|g)=1.1 {I1} (1977CoZM), 0.9 {I2} (1977LiZG) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
|m=+0.072 {I3} (1992Me07). 
MOMM1 Others: 0.07 {I1} (1976Ek03,1989Ra17) includes effect of hyperfine anomaly. Others: 1989MeZV, 1989MeZZ. 
The electronic g-factor |g(J)(2p1/2)=0.66576 {I5} (1976Ek03); |g(J)=0.665692 from Fowler (UCRL-18331, 1968); dipole constant R(MHZ)=|+228.6 {I9} (1984Be40) 
Q=-0.178 {I14} (1992Me07). 
J atomic beam (1976Ek03). Parity from shell-model assignment based on comparison of experimental and calculated |m. 
T from 1960Ju01, 1958An52. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_comment:
J 191.7|g E2 to 2-, fed with log| {Ift}=6.37 from J|p=0+, and systematics of even-A {+198}Tl, {+200}Tl. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
Branching: Based upon the assumption that essentially all |e decays go through the 84(E2) transition in {+196}Hg and all IT decays go through the 120(M4) transition in {+196}Tl; ce(L3)(84)/ce(L3)(120)=16.9 {I17} (1960Ju01), and using theoretical conversion coefficients with 1.5% uncertainties. 
|m=+0.549 {I8} (1992Me07) 
Q=+0.763 {I21} (1992Me07) 
J 120.1|g M4 to (3-). 
T from 1960Ju01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 343.9|g E1(+M2) to (7+). 
Bandhead, because the 343.9|g is the strongest line and it is in delayed coincidence with all the other members of the |g-ray cascade. 
T from time distributions of 343.9|g (1978Kr12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
J based on rotational structure of negative-parity band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from time distributions of 343.9|g. 
Assigned as the bandhead because 343.9|g is the strongest line and is in delayed coincidence with all the other members of the cascade. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J J=1/2 from (1957Br32,1976Ek03) atomic beam and |p=+ from optical spectroscopy (|m analysis) (1966Da15,1976Fu06,1978LeZA). Interpreted as 3s1/2 proton-hole state. HF(5240|a)<1.8 (1980Sc26) for |a decay from 1/2+ in {+201}Bi isomer (59 min). 
|m=+1.58 {I2} ({+205}Tl standard, 2001StZZ,1989Ra17,1966Da15) optical,+1.59 {I9} (2001StZZ,1989Ra17,1984Be40). 
T from 1961Ju05. Others: 2.8 h {I4} (1955An01), 2.8 h {I2} (1955Kn34), 2.7 h {I2} (1957An53), 2.83 h {I15} (1979Br12) 
Change of mean-square charge radius |D<r{+2}>=-0.394 (fm){+2} {i41} (1989MeZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J (222|g)(386|g)(|q), E3 |g to 3/2+ 
T from 1953He57. Others: 0.55 s {I10} (1957An54), 0.53 s {I3} (1963Di10), 0.55 s {I2} (1965Sc18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
J intraband M1+E2 cascade, E2 crossover transitions 
I|g-branching ratios via (|a,4n|g) disagree with ({+3}He,3n|g) and {+197}Pb decay (43 min). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
J M1+E2 |g to 9/2-, log| {Ift}=6.95 from 13/2+ 
Interpreted as h11/2 shell-model state (1979CoZI); {+195}Tl analog populated at 1361 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
J intraband M1+E2 cascade, E2 crossover transitions 
Branching: I|g(416|g)/I|g(724|g)=1.0 {I2} ({+197}Au(|a,4n|g)), 0.61 {I8} ({+197}Pb |e decay (43 min)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
J intraband M1+E2 cascade, E2 crossover transitions 
Branching: I|g(299|g)/I|g(715|g)=0.47 {I10} ({+197}Au(|a,4n|g)), 0.25 {I5} ({+197}Pb |e decay (43 min)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
J M1+E2 |g to 15/2-, E2 |g to 13/2-; (321|g)(737|g)(|q) in {+197}Au(|a,4n|g) 
Branching: I|g(321|g)/I|g(737|g)=0.67 {I17} ({+197}Au(|a,4n|g)), 0.27 {I4} ({+197}Pb |e decay (43 min)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_comment:
E alternate E(level)=3174.7 for inverted 102.6|g-107.2|g cascade 
J intraband (M1+E2) |g decay to (25/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T from 1953He57. Others: 0.55 s {I10} (1957An54), 0.53 s {I3} (1963Di10), 0.55 s {I2} (1965Sc18) 
(222|g)(386|g)(|q): anisotropy=0.31 {I5}, A{-2}(386|g)=0.19 {I3} (1966Sc28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
1U-transition rate (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.3) derived from level intensity balance is exceptionally fast 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
Band assignment based on B(E2)(695|g)/B(E2)(308|g)=0.86 {I20} exp, 1.1 theory (triaxial rotor) 
Branching: I|g(695|g)/I|g(308|g)=1.4 {I3} (1978Li10), 1.1 {I2} (1974Ne16); ({+3}He,3n|g) and {+197}Pb decay results differ from (|a,4n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
Band assignment based on B(E2)(715|g)/B(E2)(299|g)=2.1 {I3} exp, 1.4 theory (triaxial rotor) 
Branching: I|g(299|g)/I|g(715|g)=0.30 {I6} (1978Li10), 0.5 {I2} (1974Ne16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2
level_comment:
MOMM1$without hyperfine structure anomaly (HFA) correction 
$|d<r{+2}>({+197m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.272 fm{+2} {I26} {I19} (2013Ba41). First uncertainty is from uncertainties in isotope shifts, the second is systematic due to electronic factors and specific mass shift 
E$from Adopted Levels of {+197}Tl in ENSDF database 
J$9/2- in Adopted Levels of {+197}Tl in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Decay mode from {+197}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 
T$measured by 2018Hi07 from 385.9|g(t). Value of 0.54 s {I1} is given in {+197}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
MOMM1 Atomic Beam Magnetic Resonance(AB); {+203}Tl standard. 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.438 fm {I5} (2004An14). 
T From 1954Mi16, 1954Pa19 
J J=2 from atomic beam (1976Fu06); |p=- from decay to 0+ and 4+ states in {+198}Hg 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-,1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J E2 |g to 2-, log| {Ift}=6.2 from 0+ 
T From (K| x-ray)(173.4|g)(t) in {+198}Pb |e decay (1959Jo21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2-,3-
level_comment:
J M1(+E2) |g to 2-, log| {If{+1u}t}|?7.2 from 0+. log| {If{+1u}t}|?7.2 but feeding is weak and the log| {Ift} should probably be considered as a lower limit. J|p=1 if the log| {Ift} argument is reliable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J J=7 from atomic beam (1976Fu06); |p=+ from M4 and M1 cascade to 2-. 
T From ce(t) in {+198}Tl IT decay (1960Ju01). Others: 1.8 h (1949Or01), 1.75 h (1954Mi16), 1.90 h (1956Fi23). 
%IT, %|e+%|b: deduced from I(|g+ce)(587.2|g+767.3|g) (representing all decays by |e+|b{++}) relative to I(|g+ce)(259.6|g+282.8|g) (representing all decay by IT) (1971Pa06). 
MOMM1 Atomic Beam Magnetic Resonance(AB); {+203}Tl standard. Other: 0.64 {I7} (1976Fu06,1978LeZA,1984Be40). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T From ce(t) decay curves (1960Ju01). Others: 1.8 h (1949Or01), 1.75 h (1954Mi16), 1.90 h (1956Fi23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$ <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.447 fm {I4} (2004An14, evaluation) 
J$spin from atomic beam (1957Br32); parity from comparison of measured |m with that expected for |ps{-1/2} orbital 
T$timing of ce(K) from a sample prepared by electromagnetic separation, (1960Ju03) 
MOMM1$optical spectroscopy (1961Hu04,1961Hu08,1966Da15). Other: +1.58 {I7} (atomic beam magnetic resonance,1976Ek03,1984Be40), compilation by 2005St24. See also 1984Be40 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) ({+199}Tl IT decay) 
T$weighted av: 28.9 ms {I6} (1963De38), 27 ms {I4} (1963Di10), 26.6 ms 14 (1965Gr04), 29.2 ms {I10} (1967Co20), 28.4 ms {I2} (1977KoZH) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted av: 28.9 ms {I6} (1963De38), 27 ms {I4} (1963Di10), 26.6 ms 14 (1965Gr04), 29.2 ms {I10} (1967Co20), 28.4 ms {I2} (1977KoZH) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-,11/2-,13/2-)
level_comment:
J$825|g to 11/2- level is (M1+E2); |g(|q) suggests J=(13/2) (1986Li26) 
J$ 9/2,11/2,13/2 (1970Ne06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
J$1986Li26 deduce 17/2- from |DJ=2, Q assignment to 535|g; 1970Ne06 favored 13/2+ over (17/2-) from |g(|q) and |a(K)exp 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1958Ma21); |m 
T$From 1962Ja10; Others: 26.1 h {I4} (1957He43) and 27 h {I1} (1954Mi16) 
MOMM1$Atomic beam magnetic resonance technique. Negative sign is favored by theory. Others: |m|<0.15 (1961Hu04,1961Hu08) 
CONF$Probable a mixture of |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) and |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$147.63|g E2 to 2-; log| {Ift} in {+200}Pb |e decay favors J=0,1 
T$From 1959Jo21; Others: 7.3 ns {I3} (1960Ba05) and 8 ns {I2} (1957As64). All values are from {+200}Pb |e decay 
CONF$Dominant |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$109.54|g M1 to 0-, 257.19|g M1+E2 to 2- 
CONF$Probable dominant |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
J$289.24|g M1 to 2-; log| {Ift} in {+200}Pb |e decay favors J=2 
CONF$Probable dominant |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
J$323.7|g to 2-; 217.2|g M1+E2 from 4-; the absence of feeding from the 5+ level at 762 keV would argue against J=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
J$540.9|g E2 to 2-; absence of |e feeding in {+200}Pb |e decay favors J>2 
CONF$Probable |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$212.7|g E3 to 4- 
T$Weighted average of 34.1 ms {I10} (1963De38), 33 ms {I2} (1967Co20) and 37 ms {I4} (1963Di10) 
CONF$Probably a mixture of |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) and |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$221.1|g E1 to 4- 
T$From 220.0|g-541.0|g(|Dt) and 262.0|g-541.0|g(|Dt) in 2019Ro12. Other: 0.33 |ms {I5} in 1972Is01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$490.4|g E1 to 7+; 357.9|g E1 to (6)+ 
T$Weighted average of 6.9 ns {I5} (311|g-490|g(|Dt)) and 7.1 ns {I5} (230|g-490|g(|Dt)) and centroid-shift analysis in {+197}Au({+207}Pb,x|g) (2019Ro12); Other: 4.8 ns {I2} from |g|g(t) in {+198}Pt({+6}Li,4n|g) (1981Kr03) 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (26-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$99.2|g E2 to (24-) 
T$From |g{-1}-|g{-2}(t) (2019Ro12) using |g{-1}=285.3- and 749.3-keV, and |g{-2}=217.1-, 229.8-, 310.8-, 311.1-, 348.2-, and 490.2-keV transitions 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-3},f{-5/2}{+-1},p{-3/2}{+-1}). The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Based on the observed weak 493.8|g in parallel to 490.4|g; both transitions are proposed in 1981Kr03 to feed the same level (J|p=7+ at 753.6 keV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 6.9 ns {I5} (311|g-490|g(|Dt)) and 7.1 ns {I5} (230|g-490|g(|Dt)) and centroid-shift analysis (2019Ro12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (26-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$From |g{-1}-|g{-2}(t) (2019Ro12) using |g{-1}=285.3- and 749.3-keV, and |g{-2}=217.1-, 229.8-, 310.8-, 311.1-, 348.2-, and 490.2-keV transitions 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-3},f{-5/2}{+-1},p{-3/2}{+-1}). The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1958Li45,1958Ma21); L(p,t)=0; |m 
T$Weighted average of 3.0408 d {I13} (1982La25, original uncertainty of {I0.0040} d is 3|s), 3.0400 d {I28} (1994Si26), 3.0380 d {I17} (2004De02), 3.0486 d {I30} (2004Sc04, supersedes 3.0380 d {I7} (1979De42) and 3.043 d {I3} (1989Sc17)) and 3.0456 d {I15} (2014Un01, corrected in 2020, supersedes 3.0447 d {I9} (1982HoZJ), 3.0456 d {I15} (1992Un01,2002Un02,2012Fi12) and 3.046 d {I6} (2014Un01)). Others: 3.00 d {I13} (1950Ne77) and 3.063 d {I33} (1960He05). A value of 3.0422 d {I17} was evaluated in 2004Wo02. 
MOMM1$Using collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy technique. Other: 1.60 {I7} (1984Be40,2014StZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$588.3|g to 3/2+; systematics of similar isomers in {+197,199}Tl 
T$Unweighted average of 1.8 ms {I1} (1962Mo19), 2.3 ms {I2} (1963De38), 2.1 ms {I2} (1964Br27), 1.8 ms {I1} (1965Gr04), 2.65 ms {I20} (1967Co20), 2.1 ms {I1} (1975Uy01) and 2.035 ms {I7} (1977KoZH). Others: >60 ns 1977Sl01 
CONF$|p 9/2[505] (h{-9/2}) Nilsson orbital at oblate deformation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J$826.26|g M1+E2 to 3/2+; log| {Ift} in {+201}Pb |e decay excludes 1/2+. Note that L(p,t)=(0) is inconsistent with the adopted here assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$319.0|g M1+E2 to (9/2-). |g(|q) in 1977Sl01 does not support |DJ=0 assignment, and hence, 9/2- possibility can be excluded. Strong population of this level in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g) would favor 11/2- compared to 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2
level_comment:
J$493.9|g D to (9/2-); |g(|q) in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g) does not support |DJ=0 assignment, and hence, J=9/2 possibility can be excluded. Strong population of this level in {+202}Hg(d,3n|g) would favor J=11/2 over 7/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From 2013Bo18. The observed 148, 158, 314 and 853 keV delayed gammas are expected above the 2748.0-keV level, but their ordering is unknown. 
J$Tentative J=(33/2) in 2013Bo18 
T$From sum of (148,158,314,319,333,444,726,785,853)|g(t) in 2012BoZQ, 2013BoZT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$Unweighted average of 1.8 ms {I1} (1962Mo19), 2.3 ms {I2} (1963De38), 2.1 ms {I2} (1964Br27), 1.8 ms {I1} (1965Gr04), 2.65 ms {I20} (1967Co20), 2.1 ms {I1} (1975Uy01) and 2.035 ms {I7} (1977KoZH). Others: >60 ns 1977Sl01 
CONF$|p 9/2[505] (h{-9/2}) orbital at oblate deformation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From 2013Bo18. The observed 148, 158, 314 and 853 keV delayed gammas are expected above the 2747.9-keV level, but their ordering is unknown. 
J$Tentative J=(33/2) in 2013Bo18 
T$From sum of (148,158,314,319,333,444,726,785,853)|g(t) in 2012BoZQ, 2013BoZT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
T$for GDR for T=0.92 MeV with SLO model. Others: |G varies from 3.9 to 5.2 MeV for different model parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
T$for GDR for T=1.1 MeV with SLO model. Others: |G varies from 4.1 to 5.9 MeV for different model parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
T$for GDR for T=1.2 MeV with SLO model. Others: |G varies from 4.9 to 7.4 MeV for different model parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1958Ma35); |m. 
T$From 2011Hi19, includes both statistical and systematics uncertainties. Others: 12.47 d {I8} (2002Un02,2014Un01), 12.6 d {I1} (1984Ta09), 12.23 d {I2} (1975Co19), 12.4 d {I1} (1966Le06) and 12.0 d {I1} (1957Ha97) 
MOMM1$From 1976Ek03, 2019StZV using the atomic-beam magnetic resonance method. The sign of |m is expected to be negative based on theory 
CONF$Admixture of |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) and |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-)
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=1 would suggest J|p=0-,1- or 2-. Since this level is not fed in {+202}Tl IT decay, J|p=2- can be excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-)
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=(1) would suggest J|p=(0-,1- or 2-). Since this level is not fed in {+202}Tl IT decay, J|p=2- can be excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$459.72|g E3 to 4-; L(p,d)=6. 
T$Weighted average of 592 |ms {I4} [490.5|g(t)] and 589 |ms {I4} [459.7 |g(t)] in 2007Fo06. Others: 565 |ms {I10} (1965Gr04), 585 |ms {I25} (1958Du80), 536 |ms {I15} (1973Sa22), 500 |ms (1972Gu06), 570 |ms (1991Be41) and 572 |ms (1977HeZJ). 
MOMM1$From g=0.128 {I6} based on |g(|q,H,t) measurement in {+204}Hg(p,3n|g) (1974Ha06,2020StZV) 
CONF$Dominant |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15-,16-)
level_comment:
J$54.1|g to (15-); the absence of a transition from the J|p=(20+) isomer excludes a possible J=17 assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (16-)
level_comment:
J$253.0|g E2 to (16-), 429.0|g to (15-); the absence of a transition from the J|p=(20+) isomer excludes a possible J|p=17- or 18- assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (20+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$285.8|g E3 to (17-) 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 
T$From 134|g(t) and 493|g(t) in 2020Wa24 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 592 |ms {I4} [490.5|g(t)] and 589 |ms {I4} [459.7 |g(t)] in 2007Fo06. Others: 565 |ms {I10} (1965Gr04), 585 |ms {I25} (1958Du80), 536 |ms {I15} (1973Sa22), 500 |ms (1972Gu06), 570 |ms (1991Be41) and 572 |ms (1977HeZJ). 
$Isomeric ratio=17.0 % {I26} in {+9}Be({+238}U,x) (2013Bo18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
MOMM1$From g=0.128 {I6} based on |g(|q,H,t) measurement (1974Ha06). 
CONF$Dominant |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$Optical spectroscopy (1931Sc02,1932Ja02), NMR (1950Pr51) and hyperfine structure (2017Ba04); |p from |m, L(d,{+3}He)=0 and L(p,t)=0 
MOMM1$Recommended in 2019StZV, based on 1950Pr51 and 1963Ba23 data 
CONF$|p(s{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$279.1952|g M1+E2 to 1/2+; L(d,{+3}He)=2; L(p,t)=2 
T$Weighted average of 290 ps {I30} (1957Be57), 290 ps {I20} (1960Ba16), 283 ps {I17} (1960Go15), 281 ps {I6} (1961Sc04), 275 ps {I14} (1962De14), 283 ps {I7} (1964Ro19) using delayed coincidence technique and 266 ps {I45} (1956Me77) and 293 ps {I14} (1961De32) using the resonance fluorescence technique. Others: 208 ps {I60} (1955Az33), 220 ps {I30} (1960Jo15), 241 ps {I10} (1960Pe16), 194 ps {I28} (1967Pa09), 210 ps {I30} (1971Sh35); 271 ps {I2} (centroid shift method, 1962De14) it is too precise and it was superseded by 275 ps {I14} (slope method 1962De14); 298 ps {I35} (1958Mc02) and 284 ps {I83} (1956Me77) in Coulomb Excitation depend on |d 
MOMM1$+0.16 {I5} (liquid source) and +0.03 {I9} (metal source)) from g=+0.11 {I3} and +0.02 {I6}, respectively, in 1965Ka02 using T{-1/2}=0.277 ns {I21} from 1962De14. Others: -0.2 {I17} (1979Ha06) and +0.35 {I26} (1962De04) 
CONF$Dominant |p(d{-3/2}{+-1}) 
$B(E2)|^=0.111 {I8} (using |d=1.16 {I7}, 1973Kr02), 0.124 {I14} (using |d=1.50 {I8}, 1958Mc02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$401.320|g M1+E2 to 3/2+; 680.515|g E2 to 1/2+; L(d,{+3}He)=2; L(p,t)=2 
T$From B(E2)|^(680|g)=0.211 {I19} (1973Kr02) in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$535.09|g to 5/2+, 936.36|g to 3/2+, 1215.85|g to 1/2+; I|g(936)/I|g(1216)=6.7 {I14} favors J|p=5/2+ compared to 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$551.64|g to 5/2+; 953.33|g to 3/2+; 1232.8|g to 1/2+; L(d,{+3}He)=2; vector analyzing power in {+204}Pb(t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J$639.58|g to 5/2+; 1040.94|g to 3/2+; 1321.3|g to 1/2+; L(p,t)=(2); vector analyzing power in {+204}Pb(t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
J$232.01|g E1+M2 to 9/2+; L(d,{+3}He)=5; vector analyzing power in {+204}Pb(t,|a) 
CONF$Dominant |p(h{-11/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J$Based on excitation function data in {+203}Tl(n,n'|g) (2020Fo05) and systematics of similar states in neighboring nuclei; 409.8|g to 7/2+ 
CONF$Proposed intruder |p(h{-9/2}{++1}) state. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$497.24|g to (1/2+,3/2+); 537.11|g to (7/2+); 930.4|g to 5/2+; vector analyzing power in {+204}Pb(t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$From L(p,t)=(2); comparison of |s(|q) with DWBA calculations in {+206}Pb(p,|a) (1985Fi05); vector analyzing power in {+204}Pb(t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
J$2310.1|g to 1/2+, 473.78|g to (7/2-,9/2+); L(d,{+3}He)=2; vector analyzing power in {+204}Pb(t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
J$1464|g to 3/2+; comparison of |s(|q) with DWBA calculations in {+206}Pb(p,|a); 3911.4|g from J|p=(1/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)
level_comment:
J$(9/2,21/2+) from comparison of |s(|q) with DWBA calculations in {+206}Pb(p,|a), but non population in the decay of the (25/2+) isomer would argue against J|p=21/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$In analogy with a similar isomer in {+205}Tl. 
T$From |g(t) for 232|g, 280|g, 328|g, 589|g and 795|g in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g) (1998Pf02) 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1}~#|n(p{-1/2}){+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$From multiple decay branches; 6419.1|g (E1) to 1/2+; The absence of population of J|p=7/2- levels would argue against J|p=3/2- 
T$From 1970Mo16 in {+203}Tl(|g,|g'). |G(0)/|G(|g)=0.26 in 1970Mo16 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Values from {+203}Hg |b{+-} decay: 208 ps {I60} (1955Az33), 290 ps {I30} (1957Be57), 290 ps {I20} (1960Ba16), 283 ps {I17} (1960Go15), 241 ps {I10} (1960Pe16), 281 ps {I6} (slope) and 291 ps {I7} (centroid shift) (1961Sc04), 271 ps {I2} (centroid shift) and 275 ps {I14} (slope) (1962De14), and 283 ps {I7} (1964Ro19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels. Values from {+203}Pb |e decay: 279 ps {I10} (slope) (1961Sc04) and 298 ps {I7} (centroid shift), and 220 ps {I30} (1960Jo15). 
MOMM1$+0.16 {I5} (liquid source) and +0.03 {I9} (metal source)) from g=+0.11 {I3} and +0.02 {I6}, respectively, in 1965Ka02 using T{-1/2}=0.277 ns {I21} from 1962De14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$In analogy with {+205}Tl. 
T$From |g(t) for 232|g, 280|g, 328|g, 589|g and 795|g. 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1}~#|n(p{-1/2}){+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels. Values from {+203}Tl(|g,|g'): 266 ps {I45} (1956Me77), 293 ps {I14} (1961De32), 194 ps {I28} (1967Pa09) and 210 ps {I30} (1971Sh35) 
MOMM1$+0.35 {I26} in 1962De04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J$Based on excitation function data in 2020Fo05 and systematics of similar states in neighboring nuclei 
CONF$Proposed intruder |p(h{-9/2}{++1}) state. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g=-0.01 {I11} (1979Ha06) 
$B(E2)|^=0.111 {I8} (using |d=1.16 {I7}, 1973Kr02), 0.124 {I14} (using |d=1.50 {I8}, 1958Mc02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g=1.03 {I43} (1979Ha06) 
$B(E2)|^=0.211 {I19} (using 680|g, 1973Kr02) and 0.210 {I27} (using 680|g, 1958Mc02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$upper limit based on observation of 409.8|g in prompt beam-data and non-observation in beam-off data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From (350|g)(588|g)(t) (2022Bo04). This value can be compared with 7.9 ns {I+13-10} (1977Sl01: Nucl. Phys. A275, 166) measured by |g|g(t) using several |g rays, where absolute energy of the level could not be determined. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$measured by 2022Bo04 from (summed I|g)(t) for |g rays below the 3266-keV isomer. This value can be compared with 7.7 |ms {I5} measured by 1998Pf02 (Phys. Lett. 444B, 32). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From (350|g)(588|g)(t) (2022Bo04). This value can be compared with 7.9 ns {I+13-10} (1977Sl01: Nucl. Phys. A275, 166) measured by |g|g(t) using several |g rays, where level energy could not be specified. 
$Transition intensity balance at 2048.5 level=0 {I12} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$measured by 2022Bo04 from (summed I|g)(t) for |g rays below the 3266-keV isomer. This value can be compared with 7.7 |ms {I5} measured by 1998Pf02 (Phys. Lett. 444B, 32) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2024Yu11). 
$|d|n({+203}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-1026 MHz {I104} (2024Yu11) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+203}Tl,{+205}Tl)=-0.107 fm{+2} {I11}(stat) {I3}(syst) (2024Yu11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
$Branching from I(K| x ray)=1.64% {I4} by 1990Sc08, K fluorescence yield=0.962 {I4} from 1996Sc06, and |eK/|e=0.5836 {I14} (based on Q=344.3 {I13} and theory for first forbidden unique |e decay). 
$ BR = I(XK)/[omegaK*(CK/EC)] 
$For branching see 204TL EC decay. Other: see 1987Sc06 
J$atomic beam; |b{+-} to {+204}Pb unique shape. 
T$Weighted average of 3.754 y {I4} (1965An07), 3.825 y {I3} (1968Ho07), 3.774 y {I5} (1969Bo24), 3.7730 y {I19} (1969Jo02), and 3.793 y {I5} (1970Ha32). Others: 4.11 y {I13} (1958Ed17), 3.78 y {I4} (1959Fi27), 3.91 y {I2} (1959Wa13), 3.57 y {I4} (1961Wy01), 3.81 y {I4} (1962Le05), 3.91 y {I9} (1962Ni01), 3.80 y {I2} (1963Ha17), 3.78 y {I7} (1964Sp11), 3.68 y {I5} (1965Fl02), and 3.85 y {I4} (1968La10). 
MOMM1$From 1976Ek03 using the atomic beam magnetic resonance technique 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(f{-5/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){- 0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)-
level_comment:
J$L=1 in (d,p) and (p,d); excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g) and comparison with {+202}Tl level scheme. Note, that a level at 130-keV was populated in (d,t) (no energy uncertainty was quoted) and L=3 was assigned. 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){- 0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$Excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g); T{-1/2} consistent with RUL. 
$for E2 to GS 
T$From |g|g(t) with planar Ge(Li) and NaI(Tl) detectors in (n,|g). 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){- 0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)-
level_comment:
J$L=1 in (p,d); 154.01|g to (0-). 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-3/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){- 0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2-
level_comment:
J$L=1 in (p,d) and (d,t); 553.56|g from the 872.52-keV level (J|p=(3,4)-) rules out 0-. 
J$...also fed by primary (but not strong) G in (N,G) 
J$If absent-primary G argument for 873.5 level is valid and the JPI of that level is indeed (3,4)-, then the 553.56G decaying from it to this level implies JPI NE 0-. Without that argument, could be 2- to 0-. 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-3/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){- 0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)-
level_comment:
J$L=3 in (p,d); lack of feeding by primary |g from J|p=0+,1+ in (n,|g) may rule out 2-. 
J$ CONF=((P,S1/2)(N,F5/2,-1)), large ^S in (P,D) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$Excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g) and comparison with {+202}Tl level scheme. 
J$G(THETA) for IT DECAY of 414.03G. [supportive, but weak arg.] 
T$from 1958Du80 in IT decay. 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(d{-3/2}){+-1}]|n[(f{-5/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){- 0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)-
level_comment:
J$L=1 in (p,d); tentative 278.8|g to (0-). 
J$285G to (1)- and tentative 279 and 423G's to (0-) and 2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_comment:
$No energy uncs in (d,t), so don't know if 660 is consistent. 
J$Possible L=1 in (d,t) and (p,d); 278.33|g to (3,4)- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_comment:
$No energy uncs in (d,t), so don't know if 660 is consistent. 
J$Possible L=1 in (d,t) and (p,d); 483.29|g to (0-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)-
level_comment:
J$L=3 in (p,d); non-observation in IT decay favors J<4; possible L=1 in (d,t) favors 2-, but lack of observed feeding by primary |g from J|p=0+,1+ in (n,|g) suggests J>2. 
J$If J=4, should have had competitive decay from 7+ isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-,2-)
level_comment:
E$possibly the same level as 737.5? Depends on calib of 1973Fu17.... 
J$Possible L=1 in (p,d) and (d,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)-
level_comment:
J$L=3 in (p,d); not fed by primary |g from J|p=0+,1+ in (n,|g) 
J$Note, validity of preceding argument affects 318.92 level JPI.... 
J$No longer a "G to (1)-", 733.1 has been moved to 1051 level! 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L=6 in (p,d), (d,t), and (d,|a), with (d,|a) favoring 7+; T{-1/2} consistent with RUL for 689.9|g E3 decay to (4-). 
J$(d,a) favors J=L+1.... 
T$Weighted average of 60.7 {I12} |ms in 2008Fo03, 65 {I3} |ms in 1975Uy01, 63 {I2} |ms in 1966MoZZ, and 62 {I5} |ms in 1958Du80. 
MOMM1$From 1972Ma59 using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution method, not corrected for Knight shift or diamagnetic shielding; these corrections are expected to mostly cancel, but yield a larger uncertainty than was quoted in 1972Ma59. 
$ -->(Prev. eval. doubled the unc.) 
$Proposed dominant configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){-0+}. 
$plus admixtures of PI[(h{-9/2}){+-1}]NU[(f{-5/2}){+-1}], d3/2i13/2, h11/2f5/2, and h11/2p3/2 also possible (1972Ma59). For pure configuration, |m=+0.70 (1980Sc26) indicating substantial configuration mixing. 1972Ma59 has calculated MOMM1's for various configs: +0.65 for s1/2 x i13/2 -0.91 for d3/2 x i13/2 +7.2 for h11/2 x f5/2 +6.4 for h11/2 x p3/2 +4.7 for h9/2 x f5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_comment:
J$L=6 in (d,t) and (p,d); excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g) and comparison with {+202}Tl level scheme. 
$Possible configuration=|p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){ \-0+}. 
$coupling to 6+ expected to be unfavored compared to 7+ coupling (1103.9 level). 
$CONF=((P,S1/2,-1)(N,I13/2,-1)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
E$May be two distinct levels. In (n,|g), only a 1234.69|g decay was observed, whereas in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g), only 961.0|g decay. 
J$1234.69|g to (1)-, 961.0|g to (4-) (assuming one unique level); J|?4 from excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g) may support the existence of a second nearby level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5)
level_comment:
J$985.4|g to (4-); J|?4 from excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g). This level is likely distinct from the 1405 level in (p,d), as a higher J value is expected here than is possible through L=1 transfer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
J$Excitation function in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g) and comparison with {+202}Tl level scheme; 349.9|g to (7)+, 168.1|g to (6)+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$fed by primary G in (N,G) ==> Jpi most likely (0,1,2,3+); 1524.5G to 2- GS ==> (0-,1,2,3,4-); hence, (0-,1,2,3+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$Populated via L=5 or 6 in (p,d), this level differs from the 1709.7-keV level populated by primary |g from J|p=0+,1+ in (n,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (LE 3)
level_comment:
J$Primary |g from J|p=0+,1+ in (n,|g); possible L=3 in (p,d) and (d,t) would make a 2- assignment likely. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$668.9|g to (8,9+) rules out this being the same as the 2320-keV level populated by L=(3) in (p,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$The 350|g and 668|g reported in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g) as being from the decay of an unplaced (12-) isomer are also observed in {+205}Tl(n,2n|g). Strong population of a J=12 level is not expected in the n-induced reaction, and these |g's are likely from a level below the isomer. Thus, the energy of the proposed (12-) level is above 2318.8 keV. 
J$L=11 in (d,|a); J|p=(12-) proposed by 1998Pf02 based on analogy with {+206}Tl. 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}) \{-0+}. 
T$From 350|g(t) and 668|g(t) by 1998Pf02 in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g). The possibility that feeding from the higher-lying 1.6-|ms isomer may influence the lifetime fit for this level was not discussed in 1998Pf02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$Based on the relative population of the 1.6- and 2.6-|ms isomers in 1998Pf02, the former is expected to be at a higher energy. 
T$From |g(t) in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$From adopted levels 
T$Weighted average of 60.7 {I12} |ms (2008Fo03), 65 {I3} |ms (1975Uy01), 63 {I2} |ms (1966MoZZ), and 62 {I5} |ms (1958Du80). 
$|m=+1.187 {I6} by 1972Ma59, but not corrected for Knight shift or diamagnetic shielding; these corrections are expected to mostly cancel, but yield a larger uncertainty than was quoted (1972Ma59). 
$ -->(Prev. eval. doubled the unc.) 
$Proposed dominant configuration: |p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){-0+} 
$plus admixtures of PI[(h{-9/2}){+-1}]NU[(f{-5/2}){+-1}], d3/2i13/2, h11/2f5/2, and h11/2p3/2 also possible. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E$The 350|g and 668|g reported in 1998Pf02 as being from the decay of an unplaced (12-) isomer are also observed and placed in the {+204}Tl level scheme by 2008Fo03 in (n,2n|g). Strong population of a J=12 level was not expected in the n-induced reaction, and the 668|g, depopulating a level at 2318.8 keV (see adopted levels), was not observed in the delayed spectra of 2008Fo03. Therefore, these |g's likely do not directly depopulate the isomer, but may be fed by a decay path by-passing the isomer in (n,2n|g). Thus, the energy of the proposed (12-) level is above 2318.8 keV. 
E$The 2319 level was likely populated directly or via a decay path that by-passed the (12-) isomer in (n,2ng), so the G's are observed but are not necessarily delayed (though it is unclear whether the 668G was not seen in the delayed spectrum because it was not delayed or because of contaminants, etc.). 
J$Proposed by 1998Pf02 based on analogy with {+206}Tl, with possible configuration |p[(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}]. 
T$From 350|g(t) and 668|g(t) in 1998Pf02. The possibility that feeding from the higher-lying isomer may influence the lifetime fit for this level was not discussed in 1998Pf02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (20+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E$Based on the relative population of the 1.6- and 2.6-|ms isomers in 1998Pf02, the former is expected to be at a higher energy. 
J$Proposed by 1998Pf02 with no experimental basis given. 
J$No basis for assignment given, probably from assumed configuration PI[(h{-11/2}){+-1}]NU[(i{-13/2}){+-2}(f{-5/2})] 
T$From |g(t) in 1998Pf02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from 689.9|g(t) in beam-off mode (2008Fo03); 414.1|g(t) was also measured to be 61.4 {I24} |ms, but feeding from other levels possibly influencing the half-life could not be excluded by 2008Fo03. The 689.9|g directly de-excites the (7)+ isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-,4-
level_comment:
J$1980Sm02 assign J|p=4- to this level based on measured L value; evaluators have made the J|p assignment less restrictive. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-,1-,2-
level_comment:
E$possibly a doublet of 626.31 and 629.40 (see adopted levels). 
S$quoted as 0.065 by 1980Sm02, which may be an error. Changed by evaluators to 0.65 based on similar quoted d|s/d|W values for this and the 473-keV levels. 
S$presumably changed to 0.65 because the 473 level has C2S=0.65 with d(sigma)/d(Omega)_max=1240, similar to this level's 1280...? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
J$Assignment by 1980Sm02 made tentative by evaluators. 
$Possible configuration: |p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}]; coupling to 7+ expected to be favored over 6+ coupling (1289-keV level) 
$CONF=((P,S1/2,-1)(N,I13/2,-1)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$Assignment by 1980Sm02 made tentative by evaluators. 
$Possible configuration: |p[(s{-1/2}){+-1}]|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}]; coupling to 6+ expected to be unfavored compared to 7+ coupling (1103-keV level). 
$CONF=((P,S1/2,-1)(N,I13/2,-1)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
L$1980Sm02 give L=1 in Fig.4, but have L=1+3 tabulated. 
S$for the L=1 and L=3 components, C{+2}S=0.004 and 0.016, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1980Sm02 make the restrictive assignment of J|p=(4-) without offering justification; evaluators leave J|p unassigned. 
S$for L=5; 0.93 if L=6. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1980Sm02 make the restrictive assignment of J|p=(5-) without offering justification; evaluators leave J|p unassigned. 
S$for L=5; 1.56 if L=6. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (LE 4)-
level_comment:
L,S$Can be L=1+3, with C{+2}S<0.017 and 0.073 for the two components, respectively, or L=3 alone, with C{+2}S=0.11. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from |b(t) using an algorithm which filters instabilities in the decay curve due to correlations with atmospheric conditions during the measurement (2017Hi12). Authors state value is preliminary. 
J$From the Adopted Levels of {+204}Tl in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$Optical spectroscopy (1931Sc02,1932Ja02), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1950Pr51) and Hyperfine Structure (2013Ba41); |p from |m and L=0 in {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He), {+206}Pb(pol t,|a) and {+208}Pb(pol p,|a). 
MOMM1$From 1963Ba23,2014StZZ using the nuclear magnetic resonance technique. Others: +1.6379 {I13} (1998Gu22), based on a value given by 1968FoZZ using the atomic beam magnetic resonance technique. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$203.67|g M1+E2 to 1/2+; L=2 in {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He), {+206}Pb(pol t,|a) and {+208}Pb(pol p,|a). 
T$Weighted average of 1.46 ns {I8} (1971Sh35) in {+205}Hg |b{+-} decay, 1.41 ns {I10} (1972Ba53) in {+205}Tl(|m{+-},|g) and 1.50 ns {I10} (1967Ma45) in Coulomb excitation 
MOMM1$From 2014StZZ using the transient field integral perturbed angular correlations technique. Others: +0.02 {I12} (1979Ha06) in Coulomb excitation, using the transient field integral perturbed angular correlations technique and 0.41 {I5} (1972Ch07) in {+205}Tl(|m{+-},|g) using hyperfine structure of muonic x-rays technique 
MOME2$From 1972Ch07,2016St14 in {+205}Tl(|m{+-},|g) using hyperfine structure of muonic x-rays technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$415.71|g M1+E2 to 3/2+; 619.35|g E2 to 1/2+; L=2 in {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He),{+206}Pb(pol t,|a) and {+208}Pb(pol p,|a). 
T$From Coulomb excitation (1973Kr02) 
MOMM1$From g=0.89 {I26} in Coulomb excitation (1979Ha06,2014StZZ), using the transient field integral perturbed angular correlations technique; Others: +2.0 {I3} (2014StZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$521.30|g M1+E2 to 5/2+; 937.08|g M1+E2 to 3/2+; L=2 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a), {+206}Pb(pol t,|a), and {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$256.14|g to 7/2+; 560.7|g to 5/2+; 976.30|g to 3/2+ and 1180.2|g to 1/2+. The level is not populated in {+205}Hg |b{+-} decay (J|p=1/2-), which argue against J|p=3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
J$L=0 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a), {+206}Pb(pol t,|a) and {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He); 1014.7|g to 3/2+; 1218.7|g to 1/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$L=2 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a), {+206}Pb(pol t,|a) and {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He); 1136.56|g M1+E2 to 3/2+; 720.8|g to 5/2+ level; 1340.28|g to 1/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$505.82|g M1+E2 to 7/2+; 810.13|g to 5/2+; L=4 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a) and {+205}Tl(p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$54.38|g (E1) to 9/2+; L=5 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a) and {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He). 
T$From 203.9|g(t), 720.1|g(t) and 505.9|g(t) in {+204}Hg({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1977HaZJ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$6091.9|g, most likely E1 or M1 from 1/2-; 374.70|g to (5/2+), 630.90|g to 7/2+, 1350.73|g to 3/2+ and 1555.9|g to 1/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L=2 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a) and {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He); 646.9|g to 1/2+; 1247.2|g to 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$1001.2|g to 1/2+; 1600.2|g to 5/2+; 2220.9|g to 1/2+; 5425.3|g from 1/2-; L=2 and Ay(|q) in {+208}Pb(pol p,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$964.85|g to 3/2+; 1163.23|g to 3/2+; L=2 in {+206}Pb(pol d,{+3}He); E|g from 7646.16 keV (J|p=1/2-) state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J$1291.14|g to 3/2+,5/2+; 1491.50|g to 3/2+; 2011.3|g to 5/2+ 
MOMM1,MOME2$using hyperfine structure of muonic x-rays (1972Ch07,2014StZZ,2016St14) 
J$1282.75|g to 3/2+; 2003.79|g to 5/2+; L=3 in {+205}Tl(p,p'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2)
level_comment:
J$892.4|g to (3/2+,5/2+); 1713.0|g to (5/2+); 2275.8|g to 5/2+; 2693.3|g to 3/2+; 4752.1|g from 1/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$739.16|g E3 to 19/2-. 
T$From From |g(t) in 1982Ma05 and 1984Be14 ({+204}Hg(t,2n|g)). Other: |>3 |ms in {+204}Hg(|a,p2n|g) (1976BeXF). 
MOMM1$using g=0.544 {I8} (1982Ma05,2014StZZ) and the differential perturbed |g ray angular distribution technique in {+204}Hg(t,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (35/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$1217|g to (29/2+); systematics of similar structures in neighboring nuclei. 
T$From 2256|g-1217|g(|Dt) + 2256|g-328|g(|Dt) in {+208}Pb({+48}Ca,x|g) (2004Wr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (41/2+)
level_comment:
J$2256|g to (35/2-); systematics of similar structures in neighboring nuclei. 
CONF$[|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-2})]~#3{+-}. Assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$A mixture of |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-7{+-}} and |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-8{+-}} configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_comment:
$A mixture of |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-9{+-}} and |p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-7{+-}} configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1982Ma05 and 1984Be14. 
$|m=+6.80 {I10} using g=0.544 {I8} (1982Ma05). 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-7{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$From |G{-0}=0.025 eV {I6} and |G{-0}/|G=0.56 {I6} in 1972Wo21. 
E$Excited by the 7252-keV |g from {+63}Cu(n,|g) (1972Wo21). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 203.4|g(t) in 1972Ba53 and the slope method. Both, statistical (0.03) and systematics uncertainties are included. A consistent value of 1.42 ns {I11} is obtained using the centroid-shift analysis (1972Ba53). 
$|m=0.41 {I5}; Q=0.74 {I15} (1972Ch07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
CONF$Probably a mixture of configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#2{++} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 35/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 2256|g-1217|g(|Dt) + 2256|g-328|g(|Dt) in 2004Wr01 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$for beta decay of fully ionized {+205}Tl, measured in the Experimental Storage Ring at GSI (2024Si18). 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+205}Tl in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$From atomic-beam magnetic resonance (1969Cu09,1968Ro12,1969Fu11); |p from L=1 in {+208}Pb(d,|a), L=1 in {+205}Tl(d,p), and L=0 in {+207}Pb(t,|a). 
T$Weighted average of 4.23 min {I3} (1941Fa04), 4.19 min {I2} (1953Sa11), 4.29 min {I5} (1959Po64), 4.27 min {I5} (1970Fl12), 4.183 min {I17} (1971Pe03), 4.14 min {I5} (1972CoYX), and 4.27 min {I5} (1972Wi18). Others: 4.2 min {I2} (1972Gr01) and 4.2 min (1961Nu01). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$265.862|g E2 to 0- ; L=3 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
T$From 1984Bh06 [{+205}Tl(d,p|g)] using the p-|g delayed coincidences and the centroid-shift analysis. Other: 1.25 ns {I20} from |a-|g(t) in {+210}Bi |a decay (3.04|*10{+6} y) (1961Ru02). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$304.896|g M1 to 0-; L=1 in {+205}Tl(d,p) and {+208}Pb(d,|a), and L=0 in{+207}Pb(t,|a) 
T$From {+205}Tl({+17}O,{+16}O|g) (1975Do12) using the recoil distance technique 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$330.13|g M1 to 1-, 369.18|g M1 to 2-; L=1 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=(1) in {+205}Tl(d,p) 
T$From {+205}Tl({+17}O,{+16}O|g) (1975Do12) using recoil distance technique 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$649.42|g M1 to 0-; L=(1) in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$535.53|g M1 [|g|g(|q)] to 2-; L=3 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and {+205}Tl(d,p), and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
T$From {+205}Tl({+17}O,{+16}O|g) (1975Do12) using the recoil distance technique 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$686.31|g to 2-; L=5 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) 
T$From {+205}Tl({+17}O,{+16}O|g) (1975Do12) using recoil distance technique 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$998.2|g E2 [|g|g(|q)] to 0-, 196.8|g to 3-; L=3 in {+205}Tl(d,p) and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
$Dominant configurations=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) + |p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$1116.9|g M1 [|g|g(|q)] to 0-, 481.8|g to 2-; L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$1331.8|g M1 [|g|g(|q)] to 0-; L=1 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_comment:
J$1055.3|g M1 [|g|g(|q)] to 1-; L=1 in {+208}Pb(d,|a). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$598.2|g M1+E2 [|g|g(|q)] to 3-; 5103|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L=4 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=5 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
T$From |g(t) in 1976Ha44 [{+206}Tl IT decay]. Other: 71 ns {4} from sum of 266|g(t), 453|g(t) and 686|g(t) in 2011St21 [{+9}Be({+208}Pb,x|g)] 
MOMM1$Using g-factor=0.853 {I12} in 1976Ha44, 2020StZV [{+206}Tl IT decay] deduced using the time-differential, perturbed-angular distribution technique. The value is corrected for diamagnetism and Knight shift. 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$837.1|g M1+E2 [|g|g(|q)] to 1-, 126|g to 0-, 851.2|g to 2-; L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$216.26|g to (5)+; L=6 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) 
T$From |g(t) in 1976Ha44 [{+206}Tl IT decay] 
MOMM1$g-factor<0.35 in 1976Ha44 [{+206}Tl IT decay] using the time-differential, perturbed-angular distribution technique. 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) with small |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) admixtures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$998.4|g and 1343.0|g to 1-; 4855|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+); L=(1) in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_comment:
J$88.5|g to (7)+; 304.9|g to (5)+; L=6 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=5 in {+207}Pb(t,|a). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$1843.4|g (E2) to 0-, 1042.1|g M1(+E2) to 3-; L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)+
level_comment:
J$368.2|g to (6)+, 457.2|g to (7)+; L=8 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) with |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) admixtures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$1540.3|g to 1-; 4313|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+) 
$Dominant configurations=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) + |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-7/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$1591.8|g M1+E2 [|g|g(|q)] to 1-, 841.8|g to 2-; 4262|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+) 
$Dominant configurations=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) + |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
J$616.3|g to (6)+, 242.7|g to (8)+ 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) with |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) admixtures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-)
level_comment:
J$1048.8|g, 1263.8|g and 2075.7|g M1 [|g|g(|q)] to 1-, 1382.3|g to 2- 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$1378.0|g to 1-, 1496.1|g to 2-; 4008|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+); L=1 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) and L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a). 
$Dominant configurations=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) + |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
J$From the analysis of {+205}Tl(d,p) reaction data. 
$Probable configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(g{-9/2}{++1}) (1965Er02,1969Wh05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$From analysis of {+205}Tl(d,p) reaction data. 
$Probable configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(g{-9/2}{++1}) (1965Er02,1969Wh05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12)-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L=11 in {+208}Pb(d,|a) for a level reported at 2610 (1977Fr11); 316.8|g, 564.2|g M4 to (8)+ 
T$Weighted average of 3.6 min {I2} (1976Be44), 3.76 min {I4} (1976Ha44), and 3.73 min {I4} (1978Ur01). Other: 3.77 min {I2} in 1977UrZY, superseded by the value in 1978Ur01. 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$2154.4|g to 1-, 2002.4|g to 3-; 3699|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+); L=2 in {+207}Pb(t,|a). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$1642.3|g to 0-, 2353.3|g to 1-; 3500|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$2406.0|g to 2-, 3041.1|g to 0-; 3462|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+); L=1 in {+208}Pb(d,|a). 
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$From analysis of {+205}Tl(d,p) reaction data. 
$Probable configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(d{-5/2}{++1}) (1965Er02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$4150.8|g to 2-, 4416.2|g to 0-; 2087|g, primary |g ray from thermal neutron-capture state (J|p=0+,1+) 
$Dominant configuration=|p(g{-7/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$From analysis of {+205}Tl(d,p) reaction data. 
$Probable configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(s{-1/2}{++1}) (1965Er02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Other: 3.2 ns {I3} from |a-|g(t) in 1961Ru02, but this value is most likely associated with the 265.6 keV level (1984Bh06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1976Ha44. 
$g-factor=0.853 {I12} in 1976Ha44 using the time-differential, perturbed-angular distribution technique. This value is corrected for diamagnetism and Knight shift. 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1976Ha44. 
$g-factor<0.35 in 1976Ha44 using the time-differential, perturbed-angular distribution technique. 
$Dominant configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
$Dominant configuration=|p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) with |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) admixtures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12)-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 3.6 min {I2} (1976Be44), 3.76 min {I4} (1976Ha44), and 3.73 min {I4} (1978Ur01). Other: 3.77 min {I2} in 1977UrZY, superseded by 1978Ur01. 
$Dominant configuration=|p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From sum of 266|g(t), 453|g(t) and 686|g(t) in 2011St21 
$Experimental isomeric state population ratio=14.2% {I+21-32} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1$from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy in 1985Ne06. 
$|D<r{+2}>({+208}Tl-{+207}Tl)=0.099 fm{+2} {I15} (1992La03) 
J$L=0 in {+205}Tl(t,p) and {+208}Pb(d,{+3}He),(pol d,{+3}He) 
T$Weighted average of 4.76 min {I2} (1931Cu01), 4.77 min {I5} (1940Fa04), 4.79 min {I2} (1953Sa11) and 4.77 min {I3} (1967Tr01). The quoted uncertainty is 2|s to account for systematics uncertainties not reported by the authors. Others: T{-1/2}({+207}Tl{+71+})=25.3 min 24 for fully stripped ions from T{-1/2}({+207}Tl{+71+})/T{-1/2}({+207}Tl-n eutral)=5.3 {I5} in 2005Oh08 
CONF$|p(3s{-1/2}){+-1} (1992Gr19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$351.059|g M1+E2 to 1/2+; L=2 in {+208}Pb(d,{+3}He),(pol d,{+3}He) 
T$From |a-ce(t) (1970Ko34, 1971Ko37) in {+211}Bi |a decay. Others: 53 ns {I2} in {+207}Pb(|m{+-},|g) differs from the adopted value, but is characteristic for the |m-capture process (1981Bu14,1981Bu02) 
CONF$|p(2d{-3/2}){+-1} (1992Gr19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L=5 in {+208}Pb(d,{+3}He),(pol d,{+3}He) and a systematics of the 11/2- states in the mass region 
T$From |g(t) in {+207}Tl IT decay (1.33 s) (1965Ec02) 
CONF$96% |p(1h{-11/2}){+-1} and 4% (|p(d{-5/2}){+-1})x3{+-} (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L=2 in {+208}Pb(d,{+3}He),(pol d,{+3}He); 1682.7|g to 1/2+; 1331.7|g to 3/2+ 
CONF$84% |p(2d{-5/2}){+-1} and 16% (|p(h{-11/2}){+-1})~#3{+-} (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
E$2994 possibly unresolved line in {+208}Pb(pol d,{+3}He) (1992Gr19) 
J$1637.1|g to 11/2-, 2634.1|g to 3/2+ and observed direct |b-feeding from (9/2+) g.s. of {+207}Hg; L=4 in (pol d,{+3}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
E$2994 possibly unresolved line in {+208}Pb(pol d,{+3}He) (1992Gr19) 
J$1756.3|g to 11/2- and 2753.3|g to 3/2+ and observed direct |b-feeding from (9/2+) g.s. of {+207}Hg; L=4 in (pol d,{+3}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L=(4,5) in {+208}Pb(d,{+3}He),(pol d,{+3}He) 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}){+-1} or |p(g{-7/2}){+-1} (1992Gr19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(7/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(3s{-1/2}){+-1}x3{+-} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(5/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(3s{-1/2}){+-1}x3{+-} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(9/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}x3{+-} quadruplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(7/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}x3{+-} quadruplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(5/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}x3{+-} quadruplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(3/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}x3{+-} quadrupled 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(11/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(3s{-1/2}){+-1}x5{+-} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$(9/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(3s{-1/2}){+-1}x5{+-} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$Probably unresolved lines (1969Ha11) 
J$(7/2-:13/2-) based on the weakly coupled particle-hole-vibrational approach (1969Ha11) 
CONF$Probable member of the |p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}x5{+-} multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 351.06-keV |g(t) (1981Bu14) 
T$differs from the adopted value, but such a short half-life is characteristic for the |m- capture process (1981Bu14,1983Bu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
L,S 1992Gr19 searched for a possible L=0 contribution to this peak, corresponding to the L=0 peak in (t,p) at 4337 {I20}. An upper limit for C{+2}S of 0.03 was estimated 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2,11/2)
level_comment:
S$For g{-7/2} 
Also:0.34 for h{-11/2} (1992Gr19) 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}){+-1} or |p(g{-7/2}){+-1} (1992Gr19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
L,S$1992Gr19 searched for a possible L=0 contribution to this peak, corresponding to the L=0 peak in (t,p) at 4521 {I20}. An upper limit of 0.01 was estimated. 1984La26 report L=2+5 for a peak at 4550. 
CONF$|p(d{-5/2}){+-1} (1992Gr19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$(17/2+) assumed in 2000Re12 and based on Particle-Vibration Coupling Model prediction 
CONF$92% (|p(1h{-11/2}){+-1})x3{+-} and 8% |p(d{-5/2}){+-1}x(3{+-}){+2} (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_comment:
CONF$39% |p(d{-3/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}g{-9/2}) and 30% |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}g{-9/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 35/2(+)
level_comment:
CONF$94% |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}j{-15/2}) for +ve parity; 94% |p(h{-11/2}{+-1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}i{-11/2}) for -ve parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
E$from Adopted Levels of {+207}Tl in ENSDF database; not observed in this work 
CONF$|p(0g{-7/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$the existence of this level is indicated by the observation of a |g peak at 3142 in coincidence with the 351|g (2019BeAA). If this state corresponds to the adopted 3474, 7/2+ level, it would imply an observed |b-feeding intensity of 0.008% {I1} (2019BeAA). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2024Yu11). 
$|d|n({+207}Tl,{+205}Tl)=1023 MHz {I175} (2024Yu11) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+207}Tl,{+205}Tl)=0.107 fm{+2} {I19}(stat) {I3}(syst) (2024Yu11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 11/2
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum (2024Yu11). 
$|d|n({+207m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=1030 MHz {I290} (2024Yu11) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+207m}Tl,{+205}Tl)=0.108 fm{+2} {I31}(stat) {I3}(syst) (2024Yu11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$|D<r{+2}>({+208}Tl-{+207}Tl)=0.099 fm{+2} {I15} (1992La03) 
J$log| {Ift}=5.68 to 4- and 5.61 to 5- limits J(g.s.) to 4 or 5. |a|g(|q) is consistent with J(40 level),J(g.s.)=4,5. Not consistent with 3,4; 4,4; 5,4; 5,5; 6,5. The 40|g is M1. |p from |m 
T$from 1971Ac02 (rounded off from 3.0527 min {I33}). Others: 1957Ba05 (3.100 min {I15}), 1967La20 (3.055 min {I6}), 1970Mu21 (3.17 min {I5}). 
$configuration: |m is larger than expected for a pure configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} 5+ state. 1992La03 point out that a 25% admixture of configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} would explain the reduction in |m; however, this admixture leads to disagreement with the {+208}Tl-{+207}Tl rms radius change 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J M1 |g to 4+. |a|g(|q) allows 3,5. The J=5 member of the expected multiplet is assigned to the 328 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
J$1989Mo19 suggest interpretation as spin isovector monopole resonance (sivmr). The excitation energy is consistent with RPA calculations, and the angular distribution is consistent with DWIA calculations for such a resonance; however, other possibilities, such as L=2, J|p=1+ cannot Be unambiguously ruled out. In (|p{+-},|p{+0}), 1986Er09 report E=7000 {I3000} with |G=12000 {I7000} for the sivmr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$proposed by 1993Be19 as the spin isovector monopole resonance; however, 1995Lh02 show that |s(|q) is not consistent with DWBA calculations for L=0, but instead is fit reasonably well by L=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$(|a)(ce(L) 39.85|g)(t); measured recoil of atoms (1965Se02). Others(ps): |?4 (1956Bu26), 2.6 {I10} (1958Si81) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|G=12000 {I7000} 
E$authors quote excitation energy of 12000 {I2800} relative to target 
J$from L=0 and non spin-flip nature of the (|p{+-},|p{+0}) reaction at forward angles 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
E$from 1999An13. Other: |?1300 (1987Gl05) 
WIDTH$from 1999An13. Other: |?3500 (1987Gl05) 
J$probable giant dipole resonance (1999An13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0)-
level_comment:
E$from 1989Mo19. Others:5100 {I500} (1999An13), |?4500 (1997Ra32, 1998Lo12), 2000 to 20000 (1996Ol01, 1997Ri05) 
WIDTH$other: 3500 {I700} (1999An13), |?3000 (1997Ra32, 1998Lo12) 
J$1989Mo19 suggest identification as the spin isovector dipole resonance (sivdr). The excitation energy is close to that predicted by RPA calculations. |s(|q) is consistent with DWIA calculations for small momentum transfer, but is inconsistent at large transfer with either spin-dipole or spin-quadrupole shapes. Unresolved high-spin states could account for the deviation. The cross section ratio for the T+1 (p,n) and T-1 (n,p) reactions are consistent with sivdr. A multipole decomposition analysis by 1997Ra32 shows that this peak has components 
L$from 1996Ol01, 1997Ra32, 1997Ri05, 1998Lo12 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0)+
level_comment:
E$from 1986Er09. Others: |?9800 (1995Lh02), |?9500 (1997Ra32,1998Lo12) 
L$from 1997Ra32, 1998Lo12 
WIDTH$other: |?5500 (1997Ra32,1998Lo12) 
J$probable giant monopole resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$from 1989Mo19. Other: 13.0|*10{+3} {I13} (1999An13), |?14000 (1997Ra32, 1998Lo12) 
WIDTH$other:8200 {I1500} (1999An13), |?12000 (1997Ra32, 1998Lo12) 
L$from 1997Ra32, 1998Lo12 
J$1989Mo19 suggest interpretation as spin isovector monopole resonance (sivmr). The excitation energy is consistent with RPA calculations, and the angular distribution is consistent with DWIA calculations for such a resonance; however, other possibilities, such as L=2, J|p=1+ cannot be unambiguously ruled out. In (|p{+-},|p{+0}), 1986Er09 report E=7000 {I3000} with |G=12000 {I7000} for the sivmr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1993Be19. Other: |?16500 (1995Lh02) 
WIDTH$other: |?3500 (1995Lh02) 
J$proposed by 1993Be19 as the spin isovector monopole resonance; however, 1995Lh02 show that |s(|q) is not consistent with DWBA calculations for L=0, but instead is fit reasonably well by L=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1999An13. Other: |?19000 (1997Ra32, 1998Lo12) 
J$possible spin dipole resonance (1997Ra32) 
WIDTH$other: |?15000 (1997Ra32, 1998Lo12) 
L$from 1997Ra32, 1998Lo12 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$from {+208}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (June 2007 update) 
T$measured by 2018Ba44 (see Fig. 7c in this paper) from |b-,|g-decay curve. This value can be compared to 3.053 min {I4} in {+208}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2024Yu11). 
$|d|n({+208}Tl,{+205}Tl)=2118 MHz {I190} (2024Yu11) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+208}Tl,{+205}Tl)=0.223 fm{+2} {I21}(stat) {I6}(syst) (2024Yu11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$L(t,|a)=(0); analogy to the g.s. of {+207}Tl (J|p=1/2+) 
T$weighted average of 2.20 min {I7} from 1950Ha64, 2.161 min {I7} from 1993El08 (the value repeated by the same authors in 1994Ar23 and 1998Ar03), and 2.25 min {I14} from 1998Zh22 
CONF$|p(s{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$323.70|g M1+E2 to 1/2+, L(t,|a)=(2); analogy to E=350 keV {I6} level in {+207}Tl ({+208}Pb(t,|a)) 
CONF$|p(d{-3/2}){+-1}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$decays via an unobserved |g-ray transition to the 1121.1+x-keV 
T$from 661.2|g(t), 323.1|g(t) and 136.8|g(t) (2009Al29) 
CONF$|p(s{-1/2}){+-1}~#|n(g{-9/2}){++2}. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(t,|a)=(5); analogy to E=1341 keV {I6} level in {+207}Tl ({+208}Pb(t,|a)) 
CONF$|p(h{-11/2}){+-1}. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(t,|a)=(2); analogy to E=1674 keV {I6} level in {+207}Tl(t,|a) ({+208}Pb(t,|a)) 
CONF$|p(d{-5/2}){+-1}. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from 661.2|g(t), 323.1|g(t) and 136.8|g(t) (2009Al29) 
$Configuration=|p(3s{-1/2}){+-1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}){++2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$from expected (unobserved) |g-ray transition to E=1123+x-keV level with z=x+y. 
T$from 661.2|g(t), 323.1|g(t) and 136.8|g(t) in 2009Al29 
CONF$|p(s{-1/2}){+-1}~#|n(g{-9/2}){++2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from time difference between transitions feeding the 1228-keV level and those below the 1181-keV level, fitted as a growth and decay curve including both the 1228- and 1181-keV levels (2017Am01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
J$from fitting of the observed hyperfine spectrum with amplitude ratio of the two observed hyperfine components (2024Yu11). 
$|d|n({+209}Tl,{+205}Tl)=3130 MHz {I220} (2024Yu11) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+209}Tl,{+205}Tl)=0.330 fm{+2} {I23}(stat) {I8}(syst) (2024Yu11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
%B-N From 1961St20. 
T$from 1964We06. Other values: 1.32 min (1931Cu01), 1.3 min (1937De03), 1.50 min {I25} (1957Ko42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected; |b{+-} decay is seen in 2012Be28 through (implant)|b correlations. From calculations (1997Mo25), no |b{+-}-n decay mode is predicted 
E$ it is assumed that the observed fragments correspond to nuclei in their ground state 
T$ from (implant)|b|g correlations (2012Be28) from 3503 implants, using a fitting method for high background conditions 
J$ 1/2+ from systematics (2012Au07), and also predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Tl isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20%. Production |s=82 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress. From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number of events is assigned to {+211}Tl 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 76 s {I18} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. This value is in agreement with less precise value of 88 s {I+46-29} in {+211}Tl Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Feb 2013 update), taken from 2012Be28: Phys. Lett. B715, 293 
$%|b{+-}n: beta-delayed neutron branching ratio deduced from implant-|b and implant-|b-neutron correlations detected in forward and backward directions (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$from assumption that the observed fragments correspond to nuclei in their ground state 
J$from observed strong |b feeding of (4+) and (6+) levels in {+212}Pb and systematics of lighter Tl isotopes, J|p({+208}Tl)=5+ and J|p({+210}Tl)=(5+) 
T$from (implant)-|b decay curve analyzed using maximum likelihood method (2017Ca12,2016Ca25). Others: 96 s {I+42-38} (2012Be28) from implant-|b|g(t) with 2768 implant events and fitting method for high background conditions. 
%B-N$from implant-|b and implant-|bn correlations (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$ from shell-model calculations (2019Go10 - ({+238}U,X|g)). 1/2+ from systematics (2021Ko07). Configuration: |p (s{-1/2}{+-1}) 
T$From 2017Ca12: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method, also 24 s {I4} in 2016Ca25 - same research group. Others: 46 s {I+55-26} (2012Be28 - (implant)|b|g correlations of 2768 implants) also in 2014Mo15, 101 s {I+484-46} (2010Ch19). 
$%|b{+-}n: beta-delayed neutron branching ratio deduced from implant-|b and implant-|b-neutron correlations detected in forward and backward directions (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Tl isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20%. Production |s=9.74 nb (from e-mail reply of H. Alvarez-Pol to B. Singh (Dated: Oct 29, 2010), which also stated that further analysis was in progress. From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number of events is assigned to {+213}Tl 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from the analysis of implant-|b timing correlation with the maximum likelihood algorithm (2016Ca25, 2017Ca12). 
%B-N$from the analysis of implant-|b and neutron correlation. The efficiency of neutron detector (BELEN) was considered to be constant over the entire energy range at a value of 38% with 5% uncertainty (2016Ca25, 2017Ca12). 
$Production |s=2.50 nb with 10% statistical uncertainty and 20% systematic uncertainty (2010Al24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+215}Tl 
T$from implant-|b(t) and analyzed using analyzed by maximum-likelihood method (2016Ca25,2017Ca12). 
%B-N$from implant-|b and implant-|b-neutron correlations backward directions (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Production |s=0.243 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), 6 or 7 events are assigned to {+216}Tl 
E$ the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+216}Tl nuclei 
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=94 (1997Mo25) 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 7.4 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 2 s for |b decay (2011AuZY) 
J$ 1/2+ for proton and 3/2+ neutron configuration predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations; 5+ from systematics (2011AuZY) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Tl isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 6 s {I3} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. 
$%|b{+-}n: beta-delayed neutron branching ratio deduced from implant-|b and implant-|b-neutron correlations detected in forward and backward directions (2017Ca12,2016Ca25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$While no decay mode has been experimentally observed, evaluators assign %|b{+-}=100 by inference, as |b{+-} is the only decay mode energetically possible 
T$no experimental value has been reported. A lower limit of 300 ns is implied from time of flight through the separator as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Half-life is expected to be <10 s, based on T{-1/2}=6 s {I3} for {+216}Tl, 10 s {I4} for {+215}Tl, 11 s {I2} for {+214}Tl, 24 s {I4} for {+213}Tl (all values taken from 2016Ca25), and assuming a decreasing trend of half-lives with the increase of neutron number in n-rich nuclei. Theoretical values: 1.3 s (2003Mo09), 0.2 s (2016Ma12). 2017Au03 list 1 s from systematics. 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=80.9 (2003Mo09), 19.5 (2016Ma12) 
$Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Tl isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20%. Production |s=61.6 pb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), 4 or 5 events are assigned to {+217}Tl 
E$the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+217}Tl nuclei 
J$J|p=1/2+ for Z=81, A=193-207 nuclei suggests 1/2+ for g.s. of {+217}Tl, with s{-1/2} proton orbital, 1/2+ in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25), and from systematics (2017Au03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T From 2001RoZW. The authors report two |a decays at 202 and 147 |ms after implantation. The source for their reported error limits is unclear. From these two values the evaluators derive an estimated half-life of T{-1/2}=120 {i30} |ms. 
%|a|?100 (2003Au02). 
The {+178}Pb g.s. decays by an 7615 {i14} keV |a transition to the {+174}Hg g.s. (2001RoZW). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2016Ba60 from |a-|a correlated events, and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. This value is in agreement with 0.12 ms {I+29-5} measured by 2003BaZO (AIP Conf. Proc. 681, 144; their earlier value was 0.12 ms {I+22-5} in 2001RoZW: Intern. Conf on Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses, Aulanko, Finland, July 2-7, 2001, abstract PH-23). 
$Measured E|a=7610 {I30} (2016Ba60), assigned as g.s. to g.s. |a transition in the decay of {+178}Pb to {+174}Hg. Others: 7615 {I30} (2003BaZO, earlier value was 7615 {I14} in 2001RoZW) 
$Deduced Q(|a)=7785 {I31} from measured E|a value. 
$Deduced mass excess for {+178}Pb=3603 {I42} (2016Ba60). Others: 3569 {I24} (2012Wa38: AME-2012), 3609 {I45} (2003BaZO) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$Favored |a-decay to the (9/2-) excited state in {+175}Hg, following by 80 keV, M1 transition to the (7/2-) ground state of {+175}Hg. The assignment is tentative 
T$From 7350|a(t) in 2010An01. 
$E|a=7350 keV 20 (2010An01) 
CONF$Likely |nh{-9/2} configuration. The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 4.1 ms {I3} (2010Ra12) and 4.2 ms {I5} (2009An20), both from (recoil)|a correlations. Others: 4.5 ms {I11} (1999To11) and 4 ms {I+4-2} (1996To08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A$from gross theory, the |e+|b{++} branching intensity is expected to be about 2%. 
J$1/2- and 13/2+ isomer pair expected from systematics of heavier odd-A Pb isotopes. High-spin member is more strongly produced in heavy-ion reactions. 
T$from decay curve of 7065 keV |a particles (1996To01). Other: 50 ms {I+40-30} (1989To01) 
$E|a=7065 keV {I20} from 1996To01; 7044 keV {I15} from 1989To01. E|a=7211 keV {I10} from 1986Ke03, can not be confirmed by 1996To01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|e+%|b{++}|?2 (from syst,2012Au07). 
$(<r{+2}>){+1/2}(rms charge radius)=5.3788 fm {I35} (2013An02,evaluation) Predicted %|a=92, %|e+%|b{++}=8 based on calculated T{-1/2}(|b)=1.38 s and T{-1/2}(|a)=0.11 s (1997Mo25) 
T$from decay curve for |a lines (1999To11). Others: 55 ms {I+40-35} (1987To09), 331 ms {I158} (1984ScZQ) 
T$ theory: 2009De10, 2008AZh12 for |a decay 
$Measured |d|4r{+2}|5({+182}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.299 fm{+2} {I25} (2009Se13,2007De09,2006Se18), optical-isotope shifts by in-source laser spectroscopy. Uncertainty in isotope shift is 0.012 fm{+2} This result is consistent with a spherical shape (|b{-2}|?+0.05) for the g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+183}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.215 fm{+2} 13 (2007De09, 2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift alone is 0.008 fm{+2} (2007De09). 
%|a|?90 if %(|e+|b{++})|?10 (as estimated from gross |b-decay theory (1973Ta30)); only |a decay has been observed. 
T from 2002Je09. 
J by analogy with {+185}Pb and {+187}Pb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+183m}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.246 fm{+2} 13 (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift alone is 0.008 fm{+2} (2007De09). 
T from 2002Je09. Others: 1987To09 (300 ms {I80}, 6718|a); 1984ScZQ. 
E from E|a=6704 {I6} from this level to 171 level in {+179}Hg (weighted average of 6718 {I10} (1987To09), 6712 {I10} (1989To01) and 6698 {I5} (2002Je09)) and E|a=6777 {I6} from {+183}Pb g.s. to {+179}Hg g.s. (weighted average of 6798 {I25} (1980Sc09), 6781 {I15} (1989To01), 6775 {I7} (2002Je09)). 
J unhindered |a decay to (13/2+) 171 level in {+179}Hg. Note that {+185}Pb and {+187}Pb also have 13/2+ isomeric states. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,5/2-)
level_comment:
J structure of this state is predicted from calculations to be similar to that of {+187}Po g.s., i.e., prolate, 5/2-[512] state of mixed origin or 1/2[521] from 2f{-5/2} orbital. 
E from E|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,5/2-)
level_comment:
E from E|g. E=286 {I15} based on energy difference for |a groups feeding the g.s. and this level. 
J structure of this state is predicted from calculations to be similar to that of {+187}Po g.s., i.e., prolate and 5/2-[512] state of mixed origin or 1/2[521] from 2f{-5/2} orbital. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+183}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.215 fm{+2} 13 (2007De09, 2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift alone is 0.008 fm{+2} (2007De09, 2009Se13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+183m}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.246 fm{+2} 13 (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift alone is 0.008 fm{+2} (2007De09, 2009Se13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+184}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-1.150 {I5} (2007De09). See also 2006Se18. 
%A From 2004An07. This value is very different from %|a=23 {I14} reported by 2001Po05; however, it does fit smoothly into the systematics of reduced widths for even-mass Pb isotopes. 
T weighted average of 550 ms {I60} (1980Sc09) and 480 ms {I25} (1999To11). Other values: 315 ms {I+170-80}, 530 ms {I+700-200} (1999An52); 530 ms {I+80-60} (1982HeZM). From |a(t). 
J g.s. of even-even nucleus. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
E from {+188}Po |a decay. 
J (E0) transition to 0+ g.s.; E(level) consistent with systematics for excited 0+ states in nearby even-A Pb isotopes. 
Very tentatively associated with 0+ prolate structures known in {+186}Pb and {+188}Pb (1999An52); however, a 0+ oblate state is also expected (based on systematics) at comparable energy, and the proximity of these states may result in highly mixed configurations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
L s{-1/2} orbital p emission from {+185}Bi parent to 0+ {+184}Pb based on comparison of measured and calculated p partial half-lives. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
E from difference in E|a for |a's feeding this level and those feeding the ground state. 
Very tentatively associated with 0+ prolate structures known in {+186}Pb and {+188}Pb (1999An52); however, a 0+ oblate state is also expected (based on systematics) at comparable energy, and the proximity of these states may result in highly mixed configurations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$%|a=34 {I25} from the recoil-|a({+189}Po)-|a({+185}Pb) correlations (2005Va04) 
J$13/2+ and 3/2- for the low-lying two states from laser spectroscopy; this state is populated by the |a-decay of {+189}Po, J|p=(7/2-) 
T$From 2002An15. Others: 4.1 s {I3} from 1980Sc09 
$Only |a decay was observed. Q(|a)=6698 {I4} from 2002An15. E|a{-0}=6548, I|a{-2}<1.4%, HF>600; E|a{-1}=6486 {I5}, I|a{-2}=44% {I2}, HF=11 {I6}; E|a{-2}=6288 {I5}, I|a{-1}=56% {I2}, HF=1.5 {I8}; from 2002An15 and E|a{-1}=6290 {I15}, I|a{-1}=12% {I2}; E|a{-2}=6485 {I15}, I|a{-2}=18% {I3} (1980Sc09) 
MOMM1 from Laser Resonance Spectroscopy (2002An15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$%|a=50 {I25} estimated from the known |a-branching ratios of the neighboring Pb isotopes (2002An15) 
$Only |a decay was observed. E|a=6408 {I5}, HF=1.7 {I9} from 2002An15; E|a=6406 {I15}, HF=3.6 {I3}, assuming I|a=52% from 1980Sc09 
$%|e+%|b{++}|?40 theory (1973Ta30). 
J$see comments on the 0.0 level. 
T$from 2002An15. Other: 3.6 s {I3} (1980Sc09). 
MOMM1 from Laser Resonance Spectroscopy (2002An15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
$ |d|4r{+2}|5({+185}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.093 fm{+2} {I13} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.008 fm{+2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
$ |d|4r{+2}|5({+185m}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.125 fm{+2} {I13} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.008 fm{+2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ |d|4r{+2}|5({+186}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.048 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.005 fm{+2} 
%A Weighted average of 45% {I20} (1997Ba25), 50% {I25} (1997An09) and 38% {I9} (1999An22). Others: 5% (1972Ga27), 2.4% (1974Le02). 
T$Weighted average of 4.79 s {I5} (1980Sc09), 4.83 s {I3} (1994Wa23), 4.7 s {I1} (1984To09), 8 s {I2} (1974Le02), 7.9~s~{I16} (1972Ga27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J Assignment based on intensity balance and sum energy arguments and level energy systematics of neighboring nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_comment:
J Level tentatively assigned with J|p= 9{+-} by angular distribution information for the 918 keV transition. The angular distribution also allows an J|p = 8{++} assignment, which is unlikely due to the non-observation of the E2(8{++} to 6{++}) transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Uncertain level - not adopted. Adopted (14+) state of the prolate band is proposed at 3315.7 in ({+83}Kr,3n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%A From 2002An19, Other: 7 {I2} (1999An36) 
%EC+%B+$100%-%|a. 
J (|n p{-3/2})~#|p(0p-0h) configuration suggested in 1999An10. From systematics of g.s. J|p in {+189}Pb, {+193}Pb, {+195}Pb, {+197}Pb, and {+199}Pb, the low-spin isomer is expected to be the ground state. 
T measurement of 1981Mi12. 
|D<r{+2}>({+187}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-0.993 {I10} fm{+2} (2007De09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
%A From 1999An36. %|a=2.0 estimated by 1974Le02 from comparison of I|a(6073) with the {+196}Po |a produced by {+164}Dy({+40}Ar,8n) reaction. %|a=0.7 was estimated by 1972Ga27 from comparison of cross sections for the formation of Pb and Po nuclides by {+155}Gd({+40}Ar,xn) and {+164}Dy({+40}Ar,xn) reactions. 
E From {+187}Pb and {+187}Pb{+m} mass measurements by 2005We11. 2 keV {I15} is established in {+191}Po |a decay (22 ms). 19 keV {I10} in 2012Wa38-AME. 
J analogous to high-spin isomers of {+193}Pb, {+195}Pb, {+197}Pb; (|n i{-13/2})~#|p(0p-0h) configuration suggested in 1999An10. 
T measurement of 1981Mi12. Other measured values: 17.5 s {I36} (1972Ga27), 17 s {I4} (1974Le02). 
|D<r{+2}>({+187}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-1.025 {I10} fm{+2} (2007De09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
E Relative to the 33 keV level. For absolute energy |DE=13 keV of the 33 keV level should be considered in propagation. 
J (|n p{-3/2})~#|p(2p-2h) configuration suggested in 1999An10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from 494|g (M1) to (13/2+), HF, and the J|p of the parent nucleus (2002An19). Possible configuration (|n i{-13/2})~#|p(2p-2h). 
T based on observation of 6888|a and 494|g in prompt coincidence (1999An10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$Established in 2002An19 from the observations of the crossover 7336|a 15 decay from {+191}Po (3/2-) g.s. to {+187}Pb (13/2+) g.s. state and 7334|a 5 decay from {+191}Po (3/2-) g.s. to {+187}Pb (3/2-) metastable state. 
J (|n p{-3/2})~#|p(0p-0h) configuration suggested in 1999An10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$375|g (E0+M1+E2) to (3/2-) g.s., (|n p{-3/2})~#|p(2p-2h) configuration suggested in 1999An10. 
T based on observation of 6960|a and 375|g in prompt coincidence (1999An10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
J Author's tentative assignments, on the basis of systematic trends of heavier odd-A Pb isotopes, assuming the 0.0+x level is the low-energy isomer (J|p=13/2+) observed in this region. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_comment:
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+187m}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-0.993 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.006 fm{+2} 
J$3/2 is confirmed by 2009Se13 from analysis of measured quadrupole moment. Spin of 1/2 is rejected by hyperfine structure, and 5/2 is rejected as it gives too large a spectroscopic quadrupole moment and deformation which is inconsistent with measured rms radius 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+187}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-1.025 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.006 fm{+2} 
E$from 2005We11: Phys. Lett. A347, 81 (2005) 
J$|<7/2 rejected in the analysis by 2009Se13, but the authors state that negative sign of magnetic moment supports 1|ni{-13/2} orbital for the isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$spin from hyperfine structure measurement by 2009Se13: Eur. Phys. Jour. A41, 315 (2009); parity from trend of measured magnetic dipole moments of lightest Pb isotopes in agreement with 3p{-3/2} neutron configuration 
T$From Adopted levels in ENSDF (2009Ba12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$spin from hyperfine structure measurement by 2009Se13: Eur. Phys. Jour. A41, 315 (2009); parity from trend of measured magnetic dipole moments of lightest Pb isotopes in agreement with 1i{-13/2} neutron configuration 
E$From 2021Ko07 (NUBASE2020). Value is 33 keV {I13} in Adopted levels in ENSDF (2009Ba12). Both the values are based on mass measurements by 2005We11: Phys. Lett. A347, 81 (2005). 
T$From Adopted levels in ENSDF (2009Ba12). 
$Level energy kept fixed without uncertainty for deducing energies of levels above the 13/2(+) isomeric state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 307.9|g(t) (2022Zh22); new isomer identified by authors, and interpreted as a shape isomer due to large hindrance in B(E2)(W.u.) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$%|a: Weighted average of 8.0 {I6} (2003Va16), 9.3 {I8} (1999An22) and 8.5 {I13} (1996Bi17). Others: 3-10 (1992Wa14,1994Wa13) and 22 {I7} (1981To02) 
T$ weighted average of 25.5 s {I1} (1993Wa03,1992Wa14), 22 s {I2} (1981To02,1984To09), 24.5 s {I15} (1973Ho01), 26 s {I2} (1974Le02), 23.6 s {I45} (1972Ga27). Other: 1967Es05 quotes a value of 26 s, but without uncertainty. 
$|D<r{+2}>({+188}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-0.930 fm{+2} {i10} (2007De09,2009Se13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$From ce data in {+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g) (1999Le61). Others: 588 keV {I9} (2003Va16), 591 keV {I10} (1999An22) and 569 keV {I31} (1996Bi17) from Q|a and E|a. Note the discrepant value of 568 keV {I8} (1998Al27) 
J$E0 transition to g.s. This state is interpreted as an oblate 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$From ce data {+156}Gd({+36}Ar,4n|g) (1999Le61). Not observed in {+192}Po |a decay (2003Va16). 
J$E0 transition to g.s. A candidate for a prolate 0+ intruder state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$278.2|g E1 to 8+, 360.2|g E1 to 7+, 129|g E2 to (6-) 
MOMM1$From g=-0.037 {I3} using TDPAD (2010Io01) in {+164}Er({+28}Si,4n|g) 
T$Weighted average of 797 ns {I21} from sum of 723|g, 340|g, 370|g, 434|g and 360|g(t) in 2000By02, 830 ns {I210} from 370|g(t) in 1999Dr10 and 820 ns {I60} from |g(t) in 2010Io01 
CONF$K|p=8-, |n(7/2{+-}[514],9/2{++}[624]) at prolate deformation. Based on the measured g factor and systematics of similar structures in neighboring nuclei. An average of g{-K}-g{-R}=-0.182 {I18} from in-band branching ratios (2004Dr04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$335.4|g E1 to 10+. 
T$Weighted average of 26 ns {I4} from 335.4|g(t) in 1999Dr10 and 27 ns {I5} from |g(t) in 2010Io01 
$|m=+11.33 {i33}; from g=+1.03 {i3} using TDPAD (2010Io01) in {+164}Er({+28}Si,4n|g). 
CONF$ K|p=11-, |p(9/2{+-}[505]~#13/2{++}[606]) at oblate deformation. Based on the measured g factor and systematics of similar structures in neighboring nuclei. g{-K}-g{-R} |? +0.2 from in-band branching ratios (2004Dr04) is inconsistent with g factor for the 8{+-} state (2010Io01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E2 343.5|g to 10+. 
T$Weighted average of 94 ns {I14} from 343.5|g(t) (1999Dr10) and 99 ns {I10} from |g(t) (2010Io01) in {+164}Er({+28}Si,4n|g). 
$|m=-2.148 {I72}; from g=-0.179 {I6} using TDPAD (2010Io01) in {+164}Er({+28}Si,4n|g). 
CONF$ |n(i{-13/2}){+-2} at spherical shape 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$217.8|g (E2) to 17-. 
T$from |g|g|g(t) (2004Dr04) 
CONF$|p(9/2{+-}[505],13/2{++}[606])~#|n(7/2{++}[633],9/2{++}[624]) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$From ce data of 1999Le61. Level populated 4 % {I1} of the intensity of the 2+ to 0+ transition (1999Le61) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Other: 797 ns {i21} from sum of 723|g, 340|g, 370|g, 434|g and 360|g(t) in 2000By02 ({+155}Gd({+36}Ar,3n|g)) 
CONF$K|p=8-, |n(7/2{+-}[514],9/2{++}[624]) (prolate), supported by comparison of measured g{-K}-g{-R} with theoretical predictions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$From Adopted levels. Others: 0.83 |ms {I21} from 370|g(t) in 1999Dr10 and 0.82 |ms {I6} from |g(t) in 2010Io01 
$g=-0.037 {I3} from 2010Io01 
CONF$|n(7/2{+-}[514],9/2{++}[624]) (prolate) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$From adopted levels. 1999Dr10 assign J|p=12+ 
T$Weighted average of 26 ns {I4} from 335.4|g(t) in 1999Dr10 and 27 ns {I5} from |g(t) in 2010Io01 
$g=+1.03 {I3} from 2010Io01 
CONF$K|p=11-, |p(9/2{+-}[505]~#13/2{++}[606]) (oblate) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$from adopted levels. 1999Dr10 assign J|p=11- 
T$Weighted average of 94 ns {I14} from 343.5|g(t) in 1999Dr10 and 99 ns {I10} from |g(t) in 2010Io01. 
$g=-0.179 {I6} from 2010Io01. 
CONF$ |n(i{-13/2}){+-2} (spherical) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.4177 fm {I24} (2013An02 evaluation) 
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+189}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-0.890 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.008 fm{+2} 
$Other %A|?0.2 (1974Le02) 
T$from 2009Sa09. 
J$13/2+ and 3/2- isomers are expected from the systematics of {+187}Pb and {+191}Pb. 
MOMM1,MOME2$laser resonance ionization spectroscopy (2009Se13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from alpha-decay energy difference (2013Sa43) 
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+189m}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-0.918 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09,2009Se13); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.008 fm{+2} 
MOMM1,MOME2$laser resonance ionization spectroscopy (2009Se13) 
T$from 2009Sa09. Other: 51 s {I3} (1974Le02,1972Ga27). 
J$see J|p comment for g.s.; i{-13/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to (25/2+) 
E$this isomer is interpreted as bandhead of a shears structure with neutrons (in i{13/2} orbital) coupled to protons at |?60|' (2009Dr03) 
T$deduced from fitting of single exponential decay functions to the decay curves of both the 468 and 819 transitions in IT decay (2005Ba51) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from Adopted Levels, based on |a-decay data in 2013Sa43 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$ this isomer is interpreted as bandhead of a shears structure with neutrons (in i{13/2} orbital) coupled to protons at |?60|' 
T$deduced from fitting of single exponential decay functions to the decay curves of both the 468 and 819 transitions (2005Ba51) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$Half-life and decay modes are from {+189}Pb Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from |a decay (1996Ri12). Others: 1.2 min {I1} (1981El03), 1.2 min {I2} (1974Le02), 1.1 min (1967Es05), 1993An19 
$%|a: from 1992Wa14. Others: 0.5 {I2} (1996Bi17), 0.9 {I2} (1981El03), 0.21 {I7} (1974Ho26). 
$Structure of g.s. of {+190}Pb deduced essentially as spherical by 2015Es07 from study of |b{++}, |e decay of {+190}Pb g.s. by Total absorption gamma-ray technique (TAGS) and fitting the experimental spectrum with different models of the nucleus. 
$Evaluated nuclear rms charge radius: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.4222 fm {I23} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d|4r{+2}|5({+190}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-0.851 fm{+2} {I2} (2013An02) 
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+190}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-0.839 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09,2009Se13,2006Se18,2004DeZV); uncertainty from isotope shift is 0.005 fm{+2} 
$|D<r{+2}>({+190}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-0.840 fm{+2} {I10} (1991Du07), -0.839 fm{+2} {I10} (2007De09, 2009Se13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
E$from {+194}Po |a decay. 
J$E0 transition to g.s. Interpreted as an intruder state (1989De18) 
T$from (|a)(ce)(t) (1989De18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to (8)+ 
T$from {+166}Er({+28}Si,4n|g) (1998Dr06) 
$Configuration=|ni{+-2}{-13/2} (1998Dr06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x|?120 (1998Dr06). This level probably decays to 2615, (10+) level, through a transition of energy x. 
T$from {+166}Er({+28}Si,4n|g) (1998Dr06) 
$Configuration=|ni{-13/2}{+-2} (1998Dr06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to (8)+ 
T$from {+166}Er({+28}Si,4n|g) (2001Dr05). Other: 7.9 |ms {I4} (1985St16) 
$Configuration=|pi{-13/2}h{-9/2} (1998Dr06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J AP (10+)
level_comment:
J$the interband SD band transitions of 310, 350, 389 and 428 seen in coincidence with a large number of low-lying transitions from (9-) to (12+) levels. Most of the decay out of the band is from the two lowest states in the SD band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$12+ proposed by 1979Ro06 for a level of unknown energy probably corresponds to 2612+x level 
T$from |g(t) of the summed 773|g, 507|g, 540|g and 454|g (1985St16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x |? 120 from Fig. 1 of 1998Dr06 
T$from mean lifetime |t=36 |ms quoted by 1998Dr06 from an annual report by A.M. Baxter et al.: ANU-P/1352 (1997) 
This level probably decays to 2615, (10+) level, through a transition of energy x. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
RMS charge radius: 5.4217 fm {i26} (2004An14) 
J From |a decay hindrance factor of 2.4 {I11} to the 3/2(-) g.s. of {+187}Hg using the r{-0}({+187}Hg)=1.4964 {I71}, obtained from the r{-0} of neighboring even-even isotopes of {+187}Hg (2020Si16). Systematics of g.s. J|p in {+193}Pb, {+195}Pb, {+197}Pb, and {+199}Pb, the low-spin isomer is expected to be the ground state. 
%A Branching estimated by authors of 1974Ho26 
T From 1974Ho26 (K x-ray(t)). Other value: 1.3 min {i3} (1974Le02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
Isotope shift: |d<r{+2}> =-0.835 fm{+2} {i10}, relative to {+208}Pb (1991Du07). 
E From 2017Al34. Labeled as 0.0+x in the previous evaluation, (2007Va21). From mass excess measurements, x=55 keV {I12} was deduced in 2017Al34. In 2021Ko07 (NUBASE): 58 keV {I10}. 
J From systematics and HF |J2.6 of the 6700|a from the (13/2+) parent state in {+195}Po |a decay (1.92 s). 
T From 1981Mi11 (from several |g(t)). Other value: 2.03 min (1975UnZZ). 
$%|a from extrapolation of log E(|a) vs log T{-1/2}(|a) for 13/2+ state in {+187}Pb with slope chosen from that for adjacent sets of nuclides (1995Br38). 
MOMM1 From 2019StZV, 1991Du07 (Collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy). 
MOME2 From 2016St14, 1991Du07 (Collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (no Sternheimer correction)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J 5/2- or 7/2-, from population in the {+195}Po |a Decay (4.64 s) J{+|p}=3/2(-) and {+191}Bi |e Decay (12.4 s) J{+|p}=(9/2-) along with the hindrance factor of |a decay. J{+|p}=5/2- is proposed based on the systematics of the low-excitation energy levels in the neighboring odd-A Pb isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_comment:
E from energy reported in {+195}Po |a decay (4.64 s) dataset for the |g ray to the (3/2-) g.s. 
J Based on the E0 component of 597.2|g to 3/2(-) and the |a decay hindrance factor of 2 from (3/2-) ({+195}Po |a decay (4.64 s)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J The hindrance factor of 12 from (3/2-) state of {+191}Po |a decay is higher, yet expected (3/2-) to be a likely spin assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E From {+195}Po 1.92 s |a decay dataset, based on the |g-ray energy difference to the (13/2+) isomeric level. 
J From unhindered |a decay of the {+195}Po (1.92 s) isomeric (13/2+) state, and 669.6|g E0 component to (13/2+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
J 538.0|g D to (15/2+), 612.0|g D to (17/2+), and a non-M1 character for 224.7|g was expected for intensity balance at 1206.9+X ({+24}Mg,6n|g) (1998Fo02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_comment:
E,J Third level in the (15/2+) band according to 1998Fo02 in {+173}Yb({+24}Mg,6n|g). Authors of 1999La06 did not report the 580 and 649 keV transitions deexciting this level in ({+16}O,5n|g), presumably due to their low intensity, propose instead the 2081 keV level as member of the 15/2+ band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_comment:
E This level is proposed as the third member in the (15/2+) based band ({+16}O,5n|g), in disagreement with data in ({+24}Mg,6n|g). 
J 219.21|g M1 to (25/2+). Other: J|p=21/2+ on the rather weak basis of intensity balances in 1998Fo02 ({+24}Mg,6n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
J |g to (21/2+) and (23/2+) and (25/2+) states. 
E In 1999La06 ({+16}O,5n|g) the level was quoted from 1998Fo02 ({+24}Mg,6n|g), including 24.3 and 243.0|g transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_comment:
E This is the lowest member of the (27/2+)-based Dipole Band 2 proposed in 1998Fo02 ({+24}Mg,6n|g). 
J 184.78|g M1 to (25/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_comment:
This is the lowest member of the (29/2-) based Dipole Band 1 proposed in 1998Fo02 ({+24}Mg,6n|g). 
E The energy for this Dipole Band 1 band head, relative to the 13/2+ isomeric level, is determined by that of an unobserved |?72 keV transition. 
J From systematics of similar dipole bands in neighboring Pb nuclei ({+24}Mg,6n|g) 1998Fo02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E Level proposed only in 1999La06 ({+16}O,5n|g) as an additional member of the (13/2+) band. 
J 106.85|g E2 to (29/2+) 
T From 1999La06 ({+16}O,5n|g). Other: 0.33 |ms {i5} (2006IoZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J 5/2- or 7/2-, from population in the {+195}Po |a Decay (4.64 s) J{+|p}=3/2(-) and {+191}Bi |e Decay (12.4 s) J{+|p}=(9/2-), along with the HF of |a decay. Based on the systematics of the low-excitation energy levels in the neighboring odd-A Pb isotopes, J{+|p}=5/2- is proposed by authors of 2010Co13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J Proposed by authors of 2010Co13 based on the hindrance factor of 5985|a from the 3/2{+(-)} state of {+195}Po. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E from Adopted Levels. 
J from systematics and HF of the 6699 keV |a ray from the (13/2+) parent state in {+195}Po (2002Va13) 
T from Adopted Levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E from 2002Va13, based on the |g-ray energy difference to the (13/2+) isomeric level. For total uncertainty propagate 12 keV in quadrature. 
J based on the E0 component in 669.6|g transition to the (13/2+) isomeric level (2002Va13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
E from Adopted Levels. 
$ Suggested configuration: |n (i{-13/2}){+-1}~#(0+,{+192}Pb) 
T from Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
$ Suggested configuration: |n (i13/2){+-1}~#(2+{-1},{+192}Pb) 
E This excitation energy is in good agreement with that for the underlying spherical 2{++} state in {+192}Pb (see e.g. 2002Va13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-,29/2-)
level_comment:
J From adopted levels. 1998Fo02 proposed the option (27/2+,29/2-), but the positive parity is inconsistent with conversion coefficient measurements (see adopted dataset for discussion). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_comment:
This is the lowest member of the (29/2-) based Dipole Band 1 proposed by 1998Fo02. 
E The energy for this Dipole Band 1 band head, relative to the 13/2+ isomeric level, is determined by that of an unobserved transition to the 2439.6 keV level. The energy for this transition is estimated by 1998Fo02 on the basis of the systematics for similar band structures in neighboring neutron-deficient Pb isotopes, which provides a value of 72 {I5} keV. Therefore, the energy for this level with respect to the 13/2+ isomer state, as well as the energies for the other levels in this band, is uncertain by about 5 keV. This uncertainty is not contained in the errors quoted for the other members of this band. 
J from systematics of similar dipole bands in neighboring Pb nuclei 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (35/2-)
level_comment:
Accepting the assignment by 1998Fo02 of an E2 multipolarity for the 792.9 keV |g ray deexciting this level, leads to a ratio B(M1)/B(E2)=23 |m{+2}{-N}/(eb){+2} {I5} (1998Fo02). This value in 1998Fo02 is comparable to the ratio for similar levels in neighboring Pb nuclei (1996Ba54,1996Du18,1996Ka15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2-)
level_comment:
Accepting the assignment by 1998Fo02 of an E2 multipolarity for the 835.5 keV |g ray deexciting this level, leads to a ratio B(M1)/B(E2)=20 {I5} |m{+2}{-N}/(eb){+2} (1998Fo02). This value in 1998Fo02 is comparable to the ratio for similar levels in neighboring Pb nuclei (1996Ba54,1996Du18,1996Ka15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E from Adopted Levels. Authors of 1999La06 quote a calculated value of 148 keV, without any details. 
T from Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
This level is not seen by 1999La06, who adopt it for their level scheme from 1998Fo02, along with the deexciting |g rays. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E from Adopted Levels. 
J from systematics and HF of the 6699 keV |a ray from the (13/2+) parent state in {+195}Po (2002Va13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+206}Pb,{+192}Pb)=0.639 {I14} (1987Di06). 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=5.4287 {I25} (2004An14). 
%|a: weighted average of 0.0057 {i10} (from simultaneous measurement of |g, x-ray, |a spectra using detectors of known geometry and efficiency (1979To06)) and 0.0061 {I11} (1992Wa14; absolute |a and |g intensities). Other values: 0.0069 {I24} (1974Ho26), 0.0076 {I16} (1992Wa14; correlated |a intensities for {+196}Po and {+192}Pb decays). 
T from 1979To06, 1981So09. Other value: 2.3 min {I5} (1974Le02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J E0 769|g to 0+ g.s.; identified as |p(2p-2h) intruder state (1984Va11,1984Va19,1987Va09); likely configuration: ((|p 9/2[505]){+2}(|p 1/2[400]){+-2}) (1993Pl02). 
T from (|a)(ce)(t) in {+196}Po |a decay (1989De18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J E1 or E2 for 1238|g to g.s. restricts J|p to 1- or 2+; 2+ consistent with trend of similar states in {+194}Pb and {+196}Pb. May be J=2 member of ((|n i{-13/2}){+-2}) configuration, based on calculated energy for that state (1993Pl03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J 325|g to 4+ 1356; may be J=4 member of ((|n i{-13/2}){+-2}) configuration, based on calculated energy for that state (1993Pl03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J stretched E2 383|g to 6+ 1921. Likely configuration: ((|p 9/2[505])+(|p 7/2[514])) (1993Pl02). Probably oblate (2010Wi08). 
T from delayed coincidence in {+168}Er({+28}Si,4n|g) (2007Io03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_comment:
J E2 463|g to (5)- 1860; D 402|g to 6+ 1921; E2 191|g from (9)- 2514. Dominant configuration: ((|n i{-13/2})(|n p{-3/2})) (1993Pl02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)-
level_comment:
J M1+E2 184|g to (7)- 2323; 8- consistent with trend of similar states in {+194}Pb and {+196}Pb. Possible dominant configuration=((|n i{-13/2})(|n f{-7/2})) (1991La07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J E2 191|g to (7)- 2323; E1+M2 211|g to 8+ 2304. Dominant configuration: ((|n i{-13/2})(|n p{-3/2})) (1993Pl02). 
T from delayed coincidence in {+168}Er({+28}Si,4n|g) (2007Io03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J E1 67|g to (9)- 2514; E2 277|g to 8+ 2304. 
T weighted average of 164 ns {I7} from 162|g-(deexciting |g)(t) (2003WiZZ, fig. 3 of 2001Dr05 in ({+24}Mg,5n|g)) and 170 ns {I10} from 2007Io03 in ({+28}Si,4n|g). Others: 100 ns {I15} (1991La07) and 85 ns {I15} (1985St16) (from |g(t) or |g|g(t) in ({+16}O,6n|g), (Ar,xn|g) data set). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M4
level_comment:
MOMM1 Differential perturbed angular distributions (1989Ra17, from 1983St15). Other: -2.10 {I24} from g=-0.175 {I20} (2010Km01; TDPAD) in ({+238}U,X|g). 
Q: from TDPAD in ({+28}Si,4n|g). 
J (E2) 44|g to (10)+ 2581; consistency with level energy calculations of 1993Pl03. 
T weighted average of 1.07 |ms {I6} (2010Km01) from ({+238}U,X|g), 1.10 |ms {I5} from |g(t) in ({+40}Ar,xn|g) (1985St16) and 1.07 |ms {I10} (1983St16) from ({+40}Ar,xn|g). Others: 0.88 |ms {I20} (1979Ro06) from ({+40}Ar,xn|g); 1.5 |ms +|@-8 (2003Gl05, 2004Gl04) in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M5
level_comment:
Q: from TDPAD in ({+28}Si,4n|g). 
J E1 163|g to (10)+ 2581; (E3) 440|g to 8+ 2304. Likely configuration: ((|p 9/2[505])+(|p 13/2[606])), analogous to {+194}Hg and {+196}Hg (1993Pl02). 
T weighted average of 0.755 |ms {I21} from |g|g(t) (2001Dr05) and 756 ns {I20} from |g|g(t) in ({+28}Si,4n|g) (2007Io03). Other: 95 ns {I15} (beam-|g(t) in ({+16}O,6n|g), 1991La07); source of discrepancy not known. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
J D 486|g to 8+ 2304 so J=7,8,9; band assignment in ({+29}Si,5n|g) requires J|p=9+; possible |e feeding from (10-). A relatively strong (branching=93 {I33}) 928.7|g to (5)- 1860, proposed in |e decay, is absent in ({+24}Mg,5n|g), casting serious doubt on its placement from this level, so it has been omitted here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
J J|?(8,9) based on least-squares fit to expansions relating second moment of inertia and angular frequency, 1991He11 in (HI,xn|g): SD; |p=+ favored by analogy to {+194}Pb SD-1 band (1997Mc02). Intraband 215|g from (10+) 4640. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_comment:
J |DJ=0,2 2058|g to (10)+ 2581; J=10 supported by fit to dynamic moment of inertia; 2125|g to (9)- 2514; 2119|g to 8+ 2562. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
Intensity imbalance at level: 11 {I5}. Presumed to result from incompleteness of decay scheme; no |e feeding expected from either isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_comment:
Intensity imbalance at level: 9 {I5}; presumed to result from incompleteness of decay scheme; no |e feeding expected from either {+192}Tl isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)+
level_comment:
Intensity imbalance at level: [9.3 {I13} - I(|g+ce)(61)]|?0; negligible |e feeding is expected if J|p=8+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Tentatively introduced by evaluator to accommodate 120|g (unplaced by 1987Va09) in accord with Adopted Levels, Gammas. However, neither this level's known deexcitation |g nor those of the neighboring 2622.4 level is reported in |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11)-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Tentatively introduced by evaluator to accommodate 120|g and 163|g (unplaced by 1987Va09) in accord with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 
Intensity imbalance at level: 3.7 {I13}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
Intensity imbalance at level: 3.0 {I18} (assuming placement of 929|g from this level by 1987Va09 was incorrect). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 100 ns {I15} from |g(t) (1983St16) and 85 ns 15 from |g|g(t) (1991La07). Much lower than adopted value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
g-factor: from TDPAD. 
T from |g(t) (1985St16). Others: 1.07 |ms {I10} (1983St15), 0.88 |ms 20 (1979Ro06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J from Adopted Levels. 
T from exponential fit to sum of background-subtracted time spectra obtained by gating on 854|g, 565|g and 599|g (2010Km01). Other: 1.5 |ms +|@-8 from fragment-|g(t) (2003Gl05,2004Gl04). 
g-factor from TDPAD using sum of gates on 854|g, 565|g, 599|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
May be J=4 member of ((|n i{-13/2}){+-2}) configuration, based on calculated energy for that state (1993Pl03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
Q: from TDPAD in ({+28}Si,4n|g). 
T weighted average of 170 ns {I10} (2007Io03) and 164 ns {I7} (2003WiZZ from |g|g(t), using 162|g feeding level and |g deexciting level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
Q: from TDPAD in ({+28}Si,4n|g). 
T weighted average of 755 ns {I21} (2001Dr05) and 756 ns {I20} (2007Io03, from table 1; 758 ns {I20} is shown in fig. 2, and 2007Io01 report 755 ns {I20}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
Decay not observed. 
J$From shell model. Available low-spin configurations for N=111 are 2f5/2, 3p3/2 and 3p1/2; 3/2- is the g.s. in {+191}Pb, {+197}Pb and also in {+193}Hg and {+193}Po. 
RMS charge radius: 5.4298 fm {i22} (2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E Level energy 130 keV {i80} in 2017Au03 from systematics. 
J From shell calculations - configuration |ni{-13/2}. This high-J isomer is confirmed in {+197}Pb, {+199}Pb, {+201}Pb, {+203}Pb; also in {+199}Po, {+201}Po, {+203}Po. 
T from 1976Ha25. Other values: 5.0 min {i6}, 5.8 min {i3} (both from 1974Ne16). 
IT and |a decay not observed 
|m,Q: from collinear fast atom beam laser spectroscopy (2014StZZ,1991Du07). 
Isotope shift: |D<r{+2}> =-0.747 fm{+2} {i8} relative to {+208}Pb (1991Du07). Other: -0.746 fm{+2} {i12} (1989MeZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
J$Suggested in 2002Va13, based on the low hindrance factor for the 5622 keV |a ray feeding this level from 13/2+ state in {+197}Po |a decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$From 2014StZZ, 2004Io01: Time Dependent Perturbed Angular Distribution (TDPAD) method 
MOME2$From 2014StZZ, 2004Ba31): TDPAD method 
J E1+M2 |g to (21/2+) level 
T$From 2004Io01 - ({+28}Si,5n|g). Other: 22 ns {i2} (1991La07) -({+16}O,5n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
J Conflicting spin assignment (23/2+) in 2011Ba02 ({+28}Si,5n|g), based on 811.9|g (M1+E2) to (21/2+) level. 1991La07 - ({+16}O,5n|g) proposes 25/2+ with 811.9|g E2 from |a{-K}(exp) to (21/2+). Proposed (23/2+) assignment requires adjustment of many higher level spin assignments of ({+30}Si,5n|g) and other (HI,xn|g) datasets. Evaluator keeps (25/2+) for consistent links with higher excited levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_comment:
J$Conflicting J|p assignment: (25/2+) by 2011Ba02 ({+28}Si,5n|g). (27/2+) in ({+30}Si,5n|g), ({+24}Mg,5n|g), and ({+16}O,5n|g). Proposed (25/2+) assignment requires adjustment of many higher level spin assignments of ({+30}Si,5n|g) and other (HI,xn|g) datasets. Evaluator keeps (27/2+) for consistent links with higher excited levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$From 2011Ba02, 2014StZZ - Time Dependent Perturbed Angular Distribution (TDPAD) method. Other value: +9.9 {I4} from g=0.68 {I3} (1997Ch33). 2011Ba02 ({+28}Si,5n|g) also reanalyzed 1997Ch33 data and reproduce the g value for revised spin-parity of (27/2-). 
MOME2$From 2011Ba02, 2014StZZ: TDPAD method. Supercedes their earlier value 2.84 {i26} in 2004Ba31. 
J 2011Ba02 ({+28}Si,5n|g) propose (27/2-). E1 |g to (27/2+) level. 
T$From 2011Ba02 ({+28}Si,5n|g). Other values: 9.4 ns {I7} (1991La07), 8 ns {I2} from Recoil Shadow Anisotropy Method (2001Gu31), and 11 ns {I2} (1997Ch33). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$2742 keV {i80} in 2017Au03 from systematics. 
MOMM1$From 2014StZZ, 2004Io01: Time Dependent Perturbed Angular Distribution (TDPAD) method. 
MOME2$From 2014StZZ, 2004Ba31: TDPAD method. 
J (E2) |g to (29/2+) level 
T From 2004Io01 ({+28}Si,5n|g). Other: 104 ns {I+370-34} (2003Gl05,2004Gl04); 135 ns {I+25-15} (1991La07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (33/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J (M1) |g to (31/2-) level 
T From measured mean lifetime of 3.2 ps {i8} (2005Gl09 - ({+28}Si,5n|g)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
J$(33/2-) in 1996Du18 - ({+30}Si,5n|g) as 834|g feeding 29/2- state at 2584+x, however, adopted spin-parity is (27/2-) for the feeding state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E In the level scheme in ({+24}Mg,5n|g) 1996Ba54. this is the the level feeding by 232|g in dipole band 2 and depopulating by 197|g. However, a comparable 196.9|g placed from 4388+x level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
J$|?(23/2) 
E$4217 relative to the 13/2+ isomer was suggested by 1996Pe20 on the basis of a tentative 2222|g (I|g=0.042 {i20}) to 1995+x level. But this transition has not been confirmed in the work of 1999Ro21 using a larger detector array 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J+2
level_comment:
2282|g (I|g=0.035 {i20}) and 2352|g (I|g=0.034 {i20}) proposed by 1996Du05 as linking transitions to normal-deformed states have not been confirmed by 1999Ro21 using a larger detector array, thus these |g rays together with a 2222|g (1996Du05) have been omitted here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E$Based on two pairs of 5622|a and 757 keV {i1} |g-ray coincidences in {+197}Po decay (2002Va13) 
J$Suggested in 2002Va13, based on the low hindrance factor for the 5622 keV |a ray feeding this level from the 13/2+ state in {+197}Po. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E 130 keV {i80} from 13/2+ level systematics (2017Au03). 
J From Adopted Levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (41/2)
level_comment:
Despite the 4.4 keV energy difference, this Group 4 level appears to be the equivalent of the 5165.9 keV (43/2-) Group C level in 1996Du18 (see note in caption for Level table, and footnote for Group 4 regarding the difference in J). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (53/2)
level_comment:
E$Level not confirmed in later work ({+30}Si,5n|g). 426.1|g placed from 6657.6+x in Adopted Level. Level not adopted. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E$4217 relative to the 13/2+ isomer was suggested by 1996Pe20 on the basis of a tentative 2222|g to 1995+x level. But this transition has not been confirmed in the work of 1999Ro21 using a larger detector array 
J$|?(23/2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ from time spectra of 180|g and 556|g (2011Ba02) 
$ Configuration=|n(1i{-13/2}{+-2},3p{-3/2}) (2011Ba02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 27/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ From time spectra of 213|g (2011Ba02). 
$ Configuration=|n(1i{-13/2}{+-1})~#|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){-11}. Bandhead of a magnetic-dipole rotational (shears) band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$deduced by 2017Al34 from mass excesses of {+197}Po g.s and isomer. and measured E|a values of 6281 keV {I4} and 6383.4 keV {I24} from |a decays of {+197}Po g.s. and {+197}Po isomer, respectively. The |a energies are taken from respective |a decay datasets to {+193}Pb in the ENSDF database (A=193, March 2017 update). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 10.0 min {I4} (2003Su30), 12.0 min {I5} (1987El09), 9.2 min {I11} (1982Hi04), 11 min {I2} (1960Ju01) 
$ <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.4372 fm {I23} (2013An02 evaluation) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+194}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-0.689 fm{+2} {I4} (2013An02 evaluation). Other: |D<r{+2}>({+194}Pb,{+206}Pb)=-0.564 fm{+2} {I13} (1987Di06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$level proposed by 1987Va09 in {+194}Bi |e decay 
J$E0 transition to 0+ 
T$from |a|b(t) in {+198}Po |a decay (1989De18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$575.0|g E2, |DJ=2 to 2+. Observed anisotropy in |g(|q) data in (HI,xn|g):SD (1997Ha24) forbids 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$280.2|g E1, |DJ=1 to 4+; 3056.4|g from (6+) 
T$from |g|g(t) in ({+16}O,6n|g) (1986Pa18) 
$Probable configuration=((|n f{-5/2})(|n i{-13/2})+(|n p{-3/2})(|n i{-13/2})) (1986Va03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_comment:
J$421.0|g E2, |DJ=2 to (5)- 
$Probable configuration=((|n f{-5/2})(|n i{-13/2})+(|n p{-3/2})(|n i{-13/2})) (1986Va03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) and recoil-shadow anisotropy in ({+16}O,6n|g). Other: 17 ns {I4} from |g|g(|q) in ({+30}Si,4n|g) 
J$166.2|g E2, |DJ=2 to (7)-; 526|g from (11)- 
MOMM1$from time differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays following nuclear reactions (2004Vy01). Other: -0.63 {I36} (1985St16, TDPAD). 
$Dominant configuration=|n(2f{-5/2}{+-1}1i{-13/2}{+-1}) is consistent with measured g factor (2004Vy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$302.5|g E2, |DJ=2 to (6)+, 196.2|g (E1), |DJ=(1) to (7)- 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+194}Bi |e decay (1987Va09) 
$Configuration=((|p 9/2[505])(|p 7/2[514])) (1994Po08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$173.7|g E1, |DJ=1 to (9)-; 46.8|g from (12+) 
T$from |g|g(t) in ({+16}O,6n|g) (1986Pa18) 
$Possible configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+2}) (1986Va03). See ({+16}O,6n|g) dataset 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$level proposed by 1996Lo12 and 1997Ha24 in (HI,xn|g):SD. Population uncertain in {+194}Bi |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$configuration=|ni{-13/2}{+2} (1986Va03,1985St16) agrees with |m. See ({+16}O,6n|g) dataset 
T$from |g|g(t) in ({+16}O,6n|g). Quoted value is weighted average of 389 ns {I28} (2004Gl04), 350 ns {I10} (1985St16), 392 ns {I10} (1977Ro15), 335 ns {I30} (1972Al49). Other: 325 ns {I+100-46} from 2003Gl05 is superseded by 2004Gl04 
MOMM1$differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays following nuclear reactions (1985St16). Other: -1.90 {I7} (1977Ro15). 
MOME2$differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays from nuclear reactions (1985St16). Other: 0.48 {I3} (2004Io01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, E1 |g to (10)+ and E1 |g to (12+) 
T$weighted average of 139 ns {I7} (2005Dr11) and 133 ns {I15} (2004Vy01) in ({+30}Si,4n|g), 122 ns {I10} (1986Va03) and 135 ns {I25} (1986Pa18) in ({+16}O,6n|g). Method: |g|g(t), pulsed beam 
MOMM1$|g(|q,H,t) (time-dependent perturbed angular distribution method) (2004Vy01). Measured g factor is smaller than the calculated value of 1.10 for configuration=|p3s{-1/2}{+-1}~#p(h{-9/2}i{-13/2}). Considerations of Particle-vibration coupling and core excitations (giving 1.12) did not improve the agreement. The Nilsson model approach gives a value of 1.055 in better agreement, supporting proposed oblate deformation. 
MOME2$from TDPAD (2007Io03). Other: 4.5 {I9} from |g(|q,H), level-mixing spectroscopy technique (2002Vy01). 
$Configuration=|p9/2[505]~#|p13/2[606] (1994Po08,1986Pa18). 1986Va03 suggested configuration=|p1/2[404]{+-2}~#|p9/2[514]~#|p13/2[606] for J|p=10- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$from deexciting transitions to normal deformed levels (1996Lo12,1997Ha24). See (HI,xn|g):SD dataset 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$169.52|g (E2) to (6+); member of SD band 
T$RDDS (1997Kr03) for 170|g. Deduced Q(transition)=17.3 {I+40-24} (1997Kr03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$213.26|g (E2) to (8+); member of SD band 
T$RDDS (1997Kr03). Other: 6.0 ps {I22} (RDDS,1994Kr18). Deduced Q(transition)=20.7 {I+25-18} (1997Kr03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$256.32|g (E2) to (10+); member of SD band 
T$RDDS (1997Kr03). Other: 2.4 ps {I+14-10} (RDDS,1994Kr18). Deduced Q(transition)=18.2 {I+19-15} (1997Kr03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$260.1|g M1, |DJ=1 to (20-); band assignment 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1998Cl06); systematic uncertainty of 20% as stated in 1998Cl06 has been added in quadrature by evaluators 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$298.49|g (E2) to (12+); member of SD band 
T$from RDDS (1997Kr03) in (HI,xn|g):SD. Other: 1.8 ps {I+10-7} (RDDS,1994Kr18). Deduced Q(transition)=18.5 {I+32-20} (1997Kr03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (22-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$336.1|g M1, |DJ=1 to (21-); band assignment 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1998Cl06); systematic uncertainty of 20% as stated in 1998Cl06 has been added in quadrature by evaluators 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$375.7|g M1, |DJ=1 to (22-); band assignment 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1998Cl06); systematic uncertainty of 20% as stated in 1998Cl06 has been added in quadrature by evaluators 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (24-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$417.0|g M1, |DJ=1 to (23-), 793.2|g to (22-); band assignment 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1998Cl06); systematic uncertainty of 20% as stated in 1998Cl06 has been added in quadrature by evaluators 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (20+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$420.0|g to (18+); member of SD band 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1993Wi02). Deduced Q(transition)=23 {I+14-10} (1993Wi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (22+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$458.0|g to (20+); member of SD band 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1993Wi02). Deduced Q(transition)=22 {I+7-5} (1993Wi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (24+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$495.8|g to (22+); member of SD band 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1993Wi02). Deduced Q(transition)=20 {I+5-3} (1993Wi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (26+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$523.5|g to (24+); member of SD band 
T$from DSAM in (HI,xn|g):SD (1993Wi02). Deduced Q(transition)=21 {I+10-4} (1993Wi02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-,6-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level proposed by 1996Lo12 based on matching 478|g observed in (HI,xn|g) and in {+194}Bi |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level proposed by 1996Lo12 based on matching 788|g observed in (HI,xn|g) and in {+194}Bi |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) in 2004Vy01. 
$Dominant configuration=|n(2f{-5/2}{+-1}i{-13/2}{+-1}) is consistent with measured g factor (2004Vy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 139 ns {I7} from |g|g(t) in 2005Dr11 and 133 ns {I15} from |g|g(t) in 2004Vy01 
$Measured g factor (2004Vy01) is smaller than the calculated value of 1.10 for configuration=|p(3s{-1/2}{+-1}h{-9/2}i{-13/2}). Considerations of Particle-vibration coupling and core excitations (giving 1.12) do not improve the agreement. The Nilsson model approach gives a value of 1.055 in better agreement, supporting proposed oblate deformation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 17 ns {I5} (2001Gu31, recoil-shadow anisotropy), 18 ns {I3} (1985St16, |g|g(t)), and 15 ns {I5} (1972Al49, |g|g(t)). 
MOMM1$from g factor=-0.07 {I4} (1985St16, TDPAD). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) in 1986Pa18. Value is from authors' text. They quote 17 ns {I1} in a table. 
$Possible configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+2}) (1986Va03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 389 ns {I28} (2004Gl04), 350 ns {I10} (1985St16), 392 ns {I10} (1977Ro15), 335 ns {I30} (1972Al49). 
MOMM1$from g factor=-0.167 {I2} (1985St16). Other: -1.90 {I7} from g factor=-0.158 {I6} (1977Ro15). g factors are obtained from |g(|q,H,t) corrected by authors for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding. 
MOME2$from TDPAD in 1985St16. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 122 ns {I10} (1986Va03), and 135 ns {I25} (1986Pa18). 
$Measured g factor is smaller than the calculated value of 1.10 for configuration=|p(3s{-1/2}{+-1}h{-9/2}i{-13/2}). Considerations of Particle-vibration coupling and core excitations (giving 1.12) do not improve the agreement. The Nilsson model approach gives a value of 1.055 in better agreement, supporting proposed oblate deformation. 
MOME2$from |g(|q,H), level-mixing spectroscopy technique (2002Vy01). 
$Configuration=((|p 9/2[505])(|p 13/2[606])) (1986Pa18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
E$the 6+ member was reported at 4711 by 1996Br07, but in a later paper (1997Ha24) at 4878 as in 1996Lo12 and 1997Ha44 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$RDDS (1997Kr03). Other: 6.0 ps {I22} (RDDS,1994Kr18). Deduced Q(transition)=20.7 {I+25-18} (1997Kr03), 19.7 {I+75-20} (1994Kr18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$RDDS (1997Kr03). Other: 2.4 ps {I+14-10} (RDDS,1994Kr18). Deduced Q(transition)=18.2 {I+19-15} (1997Kr03), 23.6 {I+73-50} (1994Kr18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$RDDS (1997Kr03). Other: 1.8 ps {I+10-7} (RDDS,1994Kr18). Deduced Q(transition)=18.5 {I+32-20} (1997Kr03), 19.6 {I+57-39} (1994Kr18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
E deduced from {+199}Po |a decay (5.2 min) and {+195}Bi |e decay 
J HF(|a)=1.30 from 3/2- in {+199}Po |a decay (5.2 min) 
T from |g(t) measurement (1982Hi04). 
%EC,%B+$no evidence of |a decay observed (1977CoZM). See also isomeric (E=203,J|p=13/2+) branching comments. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E value deduced from {+199}Po |a decay: E|a(g.s.)=5952 {I2} and E|a(4.2-min isomer)=6059 {I3} (1989Zh06), and E(13/2+)=310 {I2} in {+199}Po. 
HF(|a)=1.2 from 13/2+ in {+199}Po |a decay (4.2 min) 
T from |g(t) measurement (1982Hi04). Others: 16.4 min {I3} (1974Ne16), 15.8 min {I13} (1977WeZM), 14.8 min {I4} (1977LiZG,1978Li10), 17 min {I1} (1957An53). 
%EC,%B+$no evidence of IT decay and |a decay observed (1974Ne16,1977CoZM). From systematics (1980Sc26), B(M4)(W.u.)(i13/2 to f5/2) lies in the range 1 to 3. If the {+195}Pb isomeric transition also lies in this range, then %IT=0.11 {I6}. %|a<0.01 from extrapolation of log(T{-1/2}(|a)) vs E|a data for {+187}Pb and {+191}Pb. 
|m=-1.1318 {I13} (1987Di06, 2011StZZ) 
MOMM1$ CFBLS, {+207}Pb standard (1987Di06). Other: -1.128 {I7} ({+207}Pb standard, 1991Du07). 
Q=+0.306 {I15} (1991Du07, 2011StZZ) 
MOME2$ CFBLS, {+207}Pb standard (1991Du07). Other: +0.29 {I1} (1987Di06). 
Change of the mean-square charge radius |D<r{+2}>=-0.664 (fm){+2} 13 (1989MeZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T others: >6 |ms (1978Ri01), >4 |ms (1980AlZS), 10.0 |ms (1978SaZE), 10.0 |ms {I7} (1976HeZD), 10.3 |ms +90-40 (2003Gl05,2004Gl04). 
Configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+-1}({+196}Pb 5-))21/2- (1986Pa18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 33/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1982AlZQ. Others: 50 ns {I30} (1985St16), 81 ns {I17} (1986Pa16), 95 ns (1986LaZT), 94 ns (1983RaZW, evaluator reassigned to this level). 
Configuration=(|n 1i{-13/2}){+-3} 
|m=-2.57 {I10} (1985St16, 2011StZZ). 
MOMM1$ TDPAD (1985St16). Other: -3.05 {I28} (1983RaZW) 
Other: g=-0.185 {I17} (1983RaZW) assigned by authors to 29/2+ level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
$35% feeding to normal-deformed bands. This level is expected to populate 13/2- member of the band from which 9% feeding to normal-deformed bands is estimated by 2005Jo10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
E to make comparisons easier with the even lead nuclei the isomeric 13/2+ state is considered as g.s. (1996Ka15,1995Fa19,1986Pa16,1986Pa18) x=201 {I4} from adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T others: >6 |ms (1978Ri01), >4 |ms (1980AlZS), 10.0 |ms (1978SaZE), 10.0 |ms {I7} (1976HeZD). 
Configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+-1}({+196}Pb 5-))21/2- (1986Pa18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 33/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1982AlZQ. Others: 50 ns {I30} (1985St16), 81 ns {I17} (1986Pa16), 95 ns (1986LaZT), 94 ns (1983RaZW, evaluator reassigned to this level). 
Configuration=(|n 1i{-13/2}){+-3} 
Other: g=-0.185 {I17} (1983RaZW) assigned by authors to 29/2+ level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 748|g E3 to 2+. 
Neutron two-quasiparticle state. i13/2 p3/2 (1985St16). 
T weighted average of 130 ns {I10} (|g|g(t) 1973Pa03), 134 ns {I20} ({+3}He-|g(t) 1973Dj01), and 185 ns {I20} (|g(|q,H,t) 1985St16). 
122 ns {I9} from B(E1)=1.16|*10{+-5} {I9} (1986Va03), 176 ns {I34} from B(E3)=3600 {I700} (1986Pa18), and 127 ns {I38} from B(E3)=5000 {I150} (1986Va03). 
MOMM1 g=+0.098 {I3} (1985St16) from DPAD if T{-1/2}=185 ns {I20}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-
level_comment:
J 942|g E1 to 2+, |g to g.s. not observed, log| {Ift}=6.97 from (3+). 
E this level was established through the 942|g-1049|g coin. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 138|g E2 to 7-, log| {Ift}=6.48 from (10-). 
Neutron two-quasiparticle state. 
T weighted average of 51 ns {I5} (1973Pa03), 61 ns {I14} (1973Dj01). 
56 ns {I5} from B(E2)=7.4|*10{+-3} {I7} (1986Va03), and 50 ns 5 from B(E2)=8.3|*10{+-3} (1986Pa18), |DT{-1/2} estimated by evaluator. 
MOMM1 From g=-0.037 {I10} by TDPAD (2004Vy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_comment:
J from qualitative trend of the 8- state in {+192}Pb, {+194}Pb and 165|g to 7-. But discrepant with log| {Ift}=6.80 from (10-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from time spectra (1987Pe13). 
J 198|g to (6+), rotational band member. Configuration=(9/2-[514])(7/2[514])8+ 
Proton 2-particle 2-hole intruder state. Band structure is disturbed by this J|p=8+ isomer (1983St15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 337|g E1 to 9-, log| {If{+1u}t}=6.16 from (10-). 
T from |g|g(t) (1986Pa18). <3 ns from in-beam delayed coincidence (1973WyZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 47.7|g (E2) to 10+. 
T weighted average of 269 ns {I5} (1977Ro15), 269 ns {I10} (1983St15), and 273 ns {I6} (1989Su12). Other: 295 ns {I30} (1973Pa03), 238 ns {I62} (2003Gl05), 223 ns {I40} (2004Gl04). 
Neutron two-quasiparticle state. 
MOMM1 From g=-0.1600 {I15} from |g(|q,H,t) and TDPAD in 1983St15. Other: g=-0.157 {I7} (1977Ro15). 
MOME2 From TDPAD (1981Zy02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 498|g E1 to 12+, 548|g E1 to 10+. Configuration=((9/2-[514])(13/2+[606]))11-. 
Proton 2p- {+2}H intruder state. 
T From |g|g(t) (1986Va03). Others: 74 ns {I10} (1987Pe13,1985PeZU); 72 ns {I5} (1986PeZV), 57 ns {I3} (2005Dr11) 
G From spin-precession, 0.93 from theory (1987Pe13). 
Theoretical value g=0.93 for configuration=(1/2+[404]-2, 9/2-(514)13/2+(606))11-. a member of a |DJ=1 rotational band built upon this isomer. 
MOMM1 From g=+1.04 {I5} by TDPAD (2004Vy01) 
MOMM1 Other: 10.6 {I9} (1987Pe13,1989Ra17) from spin-precession, 
MOME2 From LEMS (2001Ba86,2002Vy02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$ M1 |g to 15-, 4121. 1986Va03 suggests 15- on the basis of a combined analysis of the results of the angular distribution and conversion electron measurement and R(DCO). 
T from time spectrum for ce (1986Va03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17-
level_comment:
J$ M1 |g to 16-,4479. 1986Va03 suggests 16- on the basis of a combined analysis of the results of the angular distribution and conversion electron measurement and R(DCO). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 20+
level_comment:
J$ E2 |g to 18+,4964. 1986Va03 suggests (19-) on the basis of a combined analysis of the results of the angular distribution and conversion electron measurement and R(DCO). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 28+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$ E2 |g to 26+,7553; M1 |g to 27+,7892 
T$ From DSA (2002Si29). other: 0.104 ps 21 (1998Cl06), 0.17 ps {I4} (1995Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 22+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$0.187 ps {I35} from gating above (2002Ro30). Other: 0.23 ps 10 from line-shape analysis (1993Mo19) 
Q(transition)=17.3 {I+61-30} (1993Mo19), 21.2 {I17}, 19.2 {I18}(2002Ro30). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$ E2 |g to 27+,7892; M1 |g to 28+,8289 
T$ From DSA (2002Si29). other: 0.090 ps +21-14 (1998Cl06), 0.19 ps 3 (1995Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 24+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$0.118 ps {I21} from gating above (2002Ro30). Other: 0.12 ps +3-5 from line-shape analysis (1993Mo19). 
Q(transition)=19.1 {I+65-18} (1993Mo19), 21.9 {I15}, 20.2 {I18}(2002Ro30). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 30+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$ M1 |g to 29+,8738 
T$ From DSA (2002Si29). Other: 0.125 ps {I28} (1998Cl06), 0.16 ps 4 (1995Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 26+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$0.090 ps {I14} from gating above (2002Ro30). Other: 0.08 ps +5-2 from line-shape analysis (1993Mo19). 
Q(transition)=19.6 {I+30-40} (1993Mo19), 20.2 {I18}, 19.2 {I16}(2002Ro30). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-
level_comment:
J 942|g to 2+ is E1, |g-ray to g.s. not observed. 
E this level was established through the 942|g-1049|g coin. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$Placed in {+196}Bi low spin |e decay also. I|g deduced from intensity balance and branching ratios at 1739-keV level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_comment:
J$from systematics of the 8- state in {+192}Pb, {+194}Pb and 165|g to 7- (1987Va09). 
$From high spin |e-decay, |g to high spin. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
Configuration=(9/2- [514], 7/2- [514])8+. Proton 2p-{+2}H intruder state. Band-structure is disturbed by this J|p=8+ isomer (1983St15). 
B(E2)=0.0028 (1987Pe13) 
T from time spectra (1987Pe13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_comment:
|DJ=-1 from angular distribution coefficient and DCO ratio (1986Va03). 
J$configuration=((9/2-[514])(13/2+[606])11-. 
Interpreted as proton 2p-{+2}H state of which the particle pair is broken and coupled to maximum angular momentum. 
Theoretical value g=0.93 for configuration=(|9/2-[514] 13/2+[{-606]})11- 
G From spin precession (1986PeZV), from TDPAD (1985PeZU). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$ (E2) |g to 10+,2645 
Neutron two-quasiparticle state. 
T from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Ro15). Others: T{-1/2}=295 ns {I30} (1973Pa03); T{-1/2}=269 ns {I10} (1983St15); T{-1/2}=273 ns {I6} (1989Su12). 
G From |g(|q,H,t) and TDPAD. Other: g=-0.157 {I7} (1977Ro15). 
MOME2 From TDPAD (1981Zy02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$ E1 |g to 12+,2694, 10+,2645 
T from |g|g(t) (1986Va03). Others: 74 ns {I10} (1987Pe13,1985PeZU); 72 ns {I5} (1986PeZV), 57 ns {I3} (2005Dr11) 
G From spin-precession, 0.93 from theory (1987Pe13). 
Configuration=(9/2- [514], 13/2+ [606])11- 
CONF Proton 2p-{+2}H intruder state. 
Theory: g=0.93 for configuration=(1/2+[404]-2,9/2-[514], 13/2+[606]) 11-. a member of a |DJ=1 rotational band built upon this isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$ E2 |g to 27+,7892; M1 |g to 28+,8289 
T$ other: 0.090 ps +21-14 (1998Cl06), 0.19 ps 3 (1995Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+0.79 eb {I+10-9} (2017Pa12) 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-1.0 eb {I+9-8} (2017Pa12) 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)=0.62 {I+16-14} in 2017Pa12. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J HF=1.3 from 3/2- in {+201}Po |a decay (15.3 min) 
T unweighted average of 10 min {I2} (1979Ra04) and 6.2 min {I12} (1980Hi04) 
|m: others: -1.0753 {I22} (1989Ra17,1986An06); -1.0753 {I22} ({+207}Pb standard, 1989Ra17,1986An06); compared to -1.0742 {I12} for {+199}Pb standard (1989Ra17,1986An06). 
Q: other: -0.08 {I18} (1989Ra17,1986An06); -0.08 {I18} (1989Ra17,1986An06); compared to +0.078 {I86} for {+199}Pb standard (1989Ra17,1986An06). 
Change of mean-square charge radius |D<r{+2}>=-0.6038 (fm){+2} 50 (1986An06), -0.608 (fm){+2} 94 (1989MeZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
|m: others:-1.1045 {I27} (1989Ra17,1986An06); -1.1045 {I27} ({+207}Pb standard, 1989Ra17,1986An06), -0.975 {I40} ({+205}Pb standard, 1989Ra17), -1.084 {I19} or -1.103 {I14} (1991Du07) 
Q: others: +0.47 {I34} (1989Ra17,1986An06); +0.47 {i34} (1989Ra17,1986An06), +0.378 {i19} or +0.51 {I13} (1991Du07). 
Change of mean-square change radius |D<r{+2}>=-0.5739 (fm){+2} 47 (1986An06), -0.575 (fm){+2} 4 (relative to {+208}Pb, 1991Du07). 
J HF|?1.5 from 13/2+ in {+201}Po |a decay (8.9 min), M4 |g to 5/2-. 
T from unweighted average of 44.6 min {I9} (1979Ra04), 42 min {I2} (1957An53) and 42 min {I1} (1980Hi04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J E2 |g to 5/2-, M1+E2 |g to 3/2-, 5/2- based on intensity from |e decay feeding for {+197}Bi |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J M1 |g to 5/2-, E2 |g to 3/2-, (7/2)- based on |e decay feeding intensity from {+197}Bi |e decay seems to be most probable 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
J$ From R(DCO), 362 and 1367|g's 17/2+ and 13/2+, 319 are |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d. Only J(1687)=17/2+ compatible. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J M2+E3 |g to 17/2+, systematics with 21/2- isomers excited in {+195}Pb and {+199}Pb at 1756-keV and 2126-keV, respectively. 
T from |g(t) (1985St16). Others: |?0.7 |ms (1978Ri01), 0.47 |ms {I7} (1985Pa22,1984AlZA), 1.5 |ms {I2} (1977He06,1981He07), 1.5 |ms (1978SaZE). 
MOMM1 From g=-0.0506 {I6} (1985St16). 
|m: others: -0.531 {I7} (1989Ra17,1985St16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2)-
level_comment:
J M1 |g to 21/2-, systematics in {+199}Pb and {+195}Pb, weak-coupling model calculations (1985Pa22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 17/2+ and D |g to 21/2+.Feeding of 21/2+,2064, suggests J(2690) can not be less than 21/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 21/2+ and D |g to 25/2+. Feeding of 25/2+,2653, suggests J(2851) can not be less than 25/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J E2 to (29/2)+, weak-coupling model calculations (1985Pa22) 
T from |g(t) measurement (1985Pa22,1984AlZA,1978Ri01). Others: 75 ns 25 (1986Pa16), 56 ns {I8} (from B(E2)(33/2+ to 29/2+)=159.5 {I142}, 1986Pa16). 
|m=-2.51 {I10} (1989Ra17,1985St16) from g=-0.152 {I6} in {+198}Hg({+3}He, 4n|g); compared to -2.508 {I50} for {+199}Pb standard (1989Ra17,1985St16), -2.442 {I83} for {+205}Pb standard (1989Ra17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2)
level_comment:
E $|>3700 keV (1992Ku06). The energy of the observed bandheads which the 112keV transition into is 3758keV. 
J $from 1993Hu08. Other: 33/2 {I2} (1993Ku08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E $>3300 keV (1993Ku08). The energy of the observed bandheads is deduced from the available experimental data is over 3.3MeV. 
J $31/2 {I2} (1993Ku08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T others: |?0.7 |ms (1978Ri01), 1.5 |ms {I2} (1977He06), 0.47 |ms (1984AlZA), 0.47 |ms {I6} (1985Pa22). 
(32.5|g,57.4|g)(1005|g) coin observed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+,15/2+
level_comment:
J$11/2+,13/2+,15/2+ from M1+E2 975.5 |g to 13/2+,319. |=11/2+ from 391.7 |g from 17/2+,1687. E0 component argument here and in adopted seems incorrect or inconsistent. Only |g with E0 in adopted are for 1430 to 319, 1525 to 1174, 1624 to 1148, 1676 to 85 and 1774 to 1174, 1946(11/2+) to 1295(11/2+), and 2201 to 319. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_comment:
J$(21/2)-,(23/2)-,(25/2)- from M1 |g to (23/2)-,2301. (25/2)- from syst of {+197}Pb,{+199}Pb and {+201}Pb and weak-coupling model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_comment:
J$(23/2)-,(25/2)-,(27/2)- from M1 |g to (25/2)-,2393. (27/2)- from syst of {+197}Pb,{+199}Pb and {+201}Pb and weak-coupling model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_comment:
J$From R(DCO), |g's to 17/2+,1325 and 1687, and 21/2+,1881 and 2064,are |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d. Feeding of 21/2+,2064, suggests J(2690) can not be less than 21/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_comment:
J$From R(DCO), |g's to 21/2+,1881 and 2064, and 25/2+,2653, are |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d. Feeding of 25/2+,2653, suggests J(2851) can not be less than 25/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ From |g(t) measurement (1985Pa22, 1984AlZA,1978Ri01) 
J$25/2+ to 33/2+ from E2 |g to 29/2+,3080. (33/2+) from syst of {+197}Pb,{+199}Pb and {+201}Pb and weak-coupling model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_comment:
J$23/2-,27/2- from |DJ=1 E1 |g to 25/2+,2851. (27/2) from similarity to band 1 in {+199}Pb(1994Ba43) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2+)
level_comment:
J$R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d for |g to 25/2+,2653. (29/2+) from syst of {+197}Pb,{+199}Pb and {+201}Pb and weak-coupling model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 35/2
level_comment:
J$R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d for |g to 31/2,3768, and |DJ=1 d for |g 33/2,4082 and 4182. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 37/2+
level_comment:
J$R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d for |g to 33/2+,4082 and 3169, and |DJ=1 d for |g 35/2,4677,4497. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 43/2-
level_comment:
J$R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d for |g to 39/2-,5186, and |DJ=1 d for |g 41/2,5681 and 5480. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 55/2(+)
level_comment:
J$R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d for |g to 51/2(+),7147, and |DJ=1 d for |g 53/2(+),7551. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 57/2(+)
level_comment:
J$R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=2 E2 or |DJ=0 d for |g to 53/2(+),7551, and |DJ=1 d for |g 55/2(+),8016. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T from |g|g(t) (1985St16). Others: 1.5 |ms {I1} (1977He06), |?0.7 |ms (1981He07), 1.5 |ms (1978SaZE). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T From 1959Ju39. Other: 2.4 h {I2} (1957An53). 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.450 fm {I9} (2004An14). 
|D<r{+2}>: -0.409 fm{+2} {I12} (1987Za02), -0.528 fm{+2} {I11} (1983Th03) relative to {+206}Pb. See also 1985Ki03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}){+-1}|n(p{-3/2}){+-1} (1996Zh23) 
|m from TDPAD (2015StZZ) 
J E1 |g to 4+ 
T From |g(t) measurement (1987Ca23). Others: 49 ns {I5} (from (K x-ray)|g(t) in {+198}Bi |e decay (1972Al44,1973Pa04)), 60 ns {I15} (1972Is01), 63 ns {I3} (1972Kr08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
|m=-0.377 {I6} (1987Ca23,2011StZZ) 
MOMM1 TDPAD. Other: -0.376 {I16} (1985St16, TDPAD) 
J E2 |g to (5)- and proposed band structure 
T From |g(t) measurement (1987Ca23). Others: 3.7 |ms {I3} (1972Is01), 4 |ms (1973Dj01), |?5.3 |ms (1992Wa20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J E2 |g to (10)+ 
T From |g(t) measurement (1987Ca23). Others: 221 ns {I30} (1973Pa03), 240 ns {I20} (1986Ho03), 211 ns {I10} (1983St15). 
E believed to decay by low energy transition with 15.9 keV<E|g<88 keV (1979Al24) 
|m=-1.86 {I2} (1983St15,2011StZZ) 
MOMM1 TDPAD. Other: -1.73 {I13} (1977Ro15, TDPAD) 
Q=0.75 {I5} (1981Zy02,2011StZZ). 
MOME2 TDPAD; {+206}Pb standard. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9)-
level_comment:
For discussion of the possibility that 90.0|g transition from 9- 2231 level feeds the 7- 2141 level directly, or via an intermediate level, see 2231 level notes in (HI,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T From |g(t) measurement (1987Ca23). Others: 3.7 |ms {I3} (1972Is01), 4 |ms (1973Dj01), |?5.3 |ms (1992Wa20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+0.67 eb {I+11-10} (2017Pa12) 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=+0.5 eb {I+13-11} (2017Pa12) 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)=0.45 {I+17-12} in 2017Pa12. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$ <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.450 fm {I9} (2004An14, evaluation) 
MOMM1,MOME2$atomic-beam with LASER fluorescence spectroscopy (1986An06,1989Ra17,2005St24) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+199}Pb-{+208}Pb)=-0.516 fm{+2} 4 (1986An06) from isotope shift measurements. |D<r{+2}>({+199}Pb-{+201}Pb)=-0.107 fm{+2} 5 is ascribed to a change from f{-5/2} (in {+201}Pb) to p{-3/2} (in {+199}Pb) g.s. configurations 
J$spin from hyperfine structure, |p: |m and Q are consistent with |n 3p{-3/2} assignment (1983Th03) 
T$from 1955An01; other: |?80 min (1950Ne77) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
E$x<9.3 keV (1962Ju05,1957An53) from {+199}Pb IT decay 
J$See comment for 424.8+x level. Probable |n2f{-5/2} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$This level energy is inconsistent with results from 1962Ju05, who concluded that the energy difference between the f{-5/2} and p{-3/2} levels is less than 9.3 keV. The placement of the two |g's feeding this state may be inconsistent with some of the |g|g-coin results of 1978Ri04. 
J$M1+E2 |g from (7/2-,9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$M4 |g to 0+x level; the only possible shell model states available for an M4 transition in the N=117 nucleus are the i{-13/2} and f{-5/2} states. The i{-13/2} probably corresponds to 424.8+x and f{-5/2} to 0+x level 
T$from 1955An01. Other: 13 min {I1} (1956St05) 
%IT,%EC+%B+$ 1978LeZA (Table of Isotopes 1978) list %IT=93, %|e+%|b{++}=7 from a priv. comm. (from authors of 1973JoZF,1974JoZX) in 1974. But a copy of this communication is no longer available from the Table of Isotopes group. The e-mail queries (in July 2001) by the evaluator (of the 2006 evaluation of A=199) from two of the authors of 1973JoZF produced no response. Inspection of the gamma-ray spectrum from the decay of {+199}Pb isomer presented in 1973JoZF shows a dominant 425|g and a weak 382|g, the latter assigned to 9/2- isomer in {+199}Tl, suggesting that %IT branch is much stronger than the %|e+%|b{++} branch. But in the opinion of the evaluator, definitive information about the decay branches is lacking. 
E$others: 429.5 {I27} (2003Au02) based on x<9.3 (1962Ju05), 444 (1994Ba43,1999Po13) based on a proposed 19.6 level by 1978Ri04. But the existence of 19.6 level is considered as suspect since the |g|g coin evidence presented by 1978Ri04 is very tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 9.3 ns 6 (1988Pa12), 7.5 ns 3 (1988Ro08), 11 ns 3 (1985St16). Other: 33 ns 3 (1981He07) is discrepant (1981He07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
$Configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+-2}{-12+}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 
J$E2 |g to 25/2- level; measured g-factor agrees with proposed configuration 
MOMM1$TDPAD method (1988Ro08,1987Ca23,1989Ra17,2005St24). Other: -1.07 {I7} (1985St16) 
T$weighted average of 10.6 |ms {I5} (1989Su12,1988Pa12,1981He07), 10.0 |ms {I2} (1988Ro08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$TDPAD method (1988Ro08,1989Ra17,2005St24). Other: -2.51 {I5} (1985St16) 
$Configuration=(|n i{-13/2}){+-3} 
T$weighted average of 63 ns {I4} (1989Su12), 71 ns {I4} (1988Pa12). 55 ns {I5} (1988Ro08), 58 ns {I6} (1985St16), 55 ns {I8} (1981He07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_spin_parity: J AP (37/2)
level_comment:
E$z>5135+x, since the level decays into states between 4234+x and 5135+x 
J$possibly 37/2, since the bandhead feeds levels near 33/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=U
level_spin_parity: J1 AP (45/2)
level_comment:
E$u>4149+x, since the level decays into states between 3216+x and 4149+x 
J$possibly 45/2, since the bandhead feeds levels near 41/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$This level energy is inconsistent with results of 1962Ju05, who concluded that the energy difference between the f{-5/2} and p{-3/2} levels is less than 9.3 keV. The placement of the two |g's feeding this first excited state may be inconsistent with some of the |g|g-coin results of 1978Ri04. 
J$1978Ri04 assign (3/2)- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$others: 429.5 {I27} (2003Au02) based on x<9.3 (1962Ju05), 444 (1994Ba43,1999Po13) based on a proposed 19.6 level by 1978Ri04. But the existence of 19.6 level is considered as suspect since the |g|g coin evidence presented by 1978Ri04 is very tentative 
T$from 'adopted levels' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_spin_parity: J AP (37/2)
level_comment:
E$z>5135, since the level decays into states between 4234 and 5135 
J$possibly 37/2, since the bandhead feeds levels near 33/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
G$other: -0.074 {I5} (1985St16). For pure |n(i{-13/2}{+-2}f{-5/2}{+-1}), the expected value is -0.073 
T$from 1988Ro08. Other: 10.6 |ms {I5} (1981He07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$other: -0.152 {I3} (1985St16). For pure |ni{-13/2}{+-3} configuration, the expected value is -0.15 
T$from 1988Ro08. Others: 58 ns {I6} (1985St16), 55 ns {I8} (1981He07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_comment:
J$273.4|g M1 to 4+; 788.6|g from (5)-; non observation of |g to the 2+ level at 1026.6 keV would argue against J|p=3+ and 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$419.77|g E1 to 4+; strong population in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) (J|p=7+) requires J|>5 
T$Weighted average of 1.32 ns {I7} (1972Al44) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) and 1.40 ns {I9} (1988Pa12) and 1.3 ns {I1} (1989Su12) in (HI,xn|g) 
$A mixture of configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$245.2|g E2 to (5)- 
T$Weighted average of 47.6 ns {I25} (1972Kr08) and 44 ns {I2} (1973Pa04) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min), 43 ns {I3} (1974Lu03), 40 ns {I7} (1978Mc03) and 42 ns {I4} (1985St16) in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g), 46 ns {I1} (1987Fa15) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) and 44 ns {I2} (1989Su12,1988Pa12) in (HI,xn|g); Other: 50 ns {I10} (1972Is01) in {+203}Tl(p,4n|g) 
MOMM1$From g=-0.030 {I15} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) (1985St16) using time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 
MOME2$From {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) (1979MaYQ) using time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 
$A mixture of configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}), configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$29.5|g to (7)-; |m; analogy to similar structures in {+198}Pb, {+202}Pb and {+204}Pb 
T$Weighted average of 480 ns {I30} (1973Pa04) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min), 480 ns {I20} (1974Lu03) and 480 ns {I60} (1978Mc03) and 445 ns {I15} (1985St16) in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g), 424 ns {I10} (1987Fa15) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g), and 480 ns {I20} (1988Pa12), 480 ns {I30} (1989Su12) and 476 ns {I12} (2018La03) in (HI,xn|g); Others: 540 ns {I30} (1972Is01) in {+203}Tl(p,4n|g) and |?500 ns (1973Dj01) in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) 
MOMM1$From g=-0.0285 {I11} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) (1974Lu03) using the time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. Others: |m=-0.25 {I4} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) (1985St16) and -0.27 {I3} in (HI,xn|g) (1975Yo04) 
MOME2$From {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) (1979MaYQ) using time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$|m; analogy to similar structures in {+198}Pb, {+202}Pb and {+204}Pb 
T$Weighted average of 194 ns {I6} (1979Ma37) in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g), 202 ns {I5} (1987Fa15) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g), and 199 ns {I5} (1989Su12) and 195 ns {I8} (2018La03) in (HI,xn|g); Others: 180 ns {I30} (1978Mc03) in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g), 152 ns {I30} (1988Pa12), 160 ns {I30} (1973Pa03) and 158 ns {I30} (1975Yo04) in (HI,xn|g) 
MOMM1$Weighted average of -1.849 {I12} (1988Ro08), -1.836 {I7} (1987Fa15) and -1.81 {I2} (1983St15) using time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 
MOME2$Using time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique, normalized to Q=0.51 {I2} in {+206}Pb. 
$Configuration=|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (16+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$278.1|g E2 to (14+) 
T$From 1989Su12 in (HI,xn|g). Other: 5 ns {I1} (1987Fa15) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) 
$Configuration=|n(i{-13/2}{+-2})~#4{++} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17-)
level_comment:
J$665.6|g and 862.7|g E1 to (16+); relative population of this level in (HI,xn|g) and {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$67.7|g E2 to (17-); |m 
T$Weighted average of 67 ns {I5} (1987Fa15) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g), and 87 ns {I18} (2018La03), 73 ns {I4} (1989Su12), 77 ns {I5} (1988Pa12) and 60 ns {I15} (1973Pa03) in (HI,xn|g) 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M4
level_comment:
J$From 1988Pa12 in (HI,xn|g), based on systematics and shell model 
T$From 1988Pa12 in (HI,xn|g) 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-5}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels. Values measured in {+200}Bi |e decay: 1.32 ns {I7} from |g|g(t) in 1972Al44 and 1.50 ns {I8} from 245|g-420|g(t) in 1972Kr08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels. Values measured in {+200}Bi |e decay: 44 ns {I2} in 1973Pa04 and 47.6 ns {I25} in 1972Kr08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1974Lu03. Others: 40 ns {I7} (1978Mc03) and 42 ns {I4} (1985St16) 
$g=-0.030 {I15} (1985St16) and Q=0.32 eb {I2} (1979MaYQ) using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1974Lu03; Others: |?0.5 |ms (1973Dj01), 480 ns {I60} (1978Mc03) and 445 ns {I15} (1985St16) 
CONF$Pure |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}), from comparison between g(exp)=-0.0285 {I11} and g(th)=-0.025 {I8} in 1974Lu03 
$g=-0.0285 {I11} (1974Lu03) and -0.028 {I4} (1985St16); Q=0.40 eb {I2} (1979MaYQ); the time differential perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in 1979Ma37. Other: 180 ns {I30} (1978Mc03) 
$Q=0.79 eb {I3} from 1979Ma37 normalized to Q=0.51 eb {I2} in {+206}Pb using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$A mixture of configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1987Fa15 
$A mixture of configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}), configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 776.9|g(t) in 1987Fa15 
$g=-0.1530 {I6} from 1987Fa15, using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution technique. 
$Configuration=|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$Recommended in 1987Fa15, based on weighted average of 62 ns {I2} (278.1|g(t)) and 71 ns {I2} (861.3|g(t)) in 1987Fa15. Other: 77 ns {I10} from 665.2|g(t) in 1987Fa15 
$g=-0.094 {I7} from 1987Fa15, corrected for Knight shift, using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution technique 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) in 1988Pa12; Other: 1.3 ns {I1} in 1989Su12 
$A mixture of configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From 1989Su12 and 1988Pa12 
$A mixture of configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}), configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) and configuration=|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1988Pa12; Others: 480 ns {I30} (1989Su12) and 476 ns {I12} (2018La03) 
$g=-0.030 {I3} (1975Yo04) using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution technique 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 1989Su12. Other: 152 ns {I20} (1988Pa12), 158 ns {I30} (1975Yo04), 195 ns {I8} (2018La03), 160 ns {I30} (1973Pa03) 
$g=-0.157 {I6} (1975Yo04) using the time-differential perturbed angular distribution technique 
$Configuration=|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$From 1989Su12. Others: 87 ns {I18} (2018La03), 77 ns {I5} (1988Pa12) and 60 ns {I15} (1973Pa03) 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam magnetic resonance (1977Gu18); Favored |a decay from {+205}Po g.s. (J|p=5/2-); |m 
T$Weighted average of 9.300 {I75} (330.7|g(t)), 9.40 {I15} (691.9|g(t)) and 9.350 {I78} (945.4|g(t)) in 1981An11. Others: 8 h {I2} (1950Ne77), 8.4 h {I10} (1954Wa12), 9.4 h 2 (1955Be12) and 10.0 h {I8} (1960Li08). 
MOMM1,MOME2$From 1986An06, using the atomic beam with laser fluorescence spectroscopy technique. |m=+0.6753 {I5} in 1986An06, but diamagnetic correction applied in 2019StZV 
$|d<r{+2}>=-0.4093 fm{+2} {I34} (1986An06). Other: -0.4225 {I5} fm{+2} (1982Th05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$629.1|g M4 to 5/2- 
T$Weighted average of 60.1 s {I44} (1955Fi30) and 61 s {I2} (1956St05). Other: 50 s (1952Ho41). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$350.3|g E2 to 15/2+, 354.3|g M1 to 17/2+ 
T$Weighted average of 3.2 ns {I6} using (350|g,354|g,913|g,917|g)(t) in 1981He07 ({+200}Hg(|a,3n|g)) and 3.3 ns {I3} from |g|g(|Dt) and centroid-shift analysis in 2020Wa24 ({+197}Au({+207}Pb,X|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$|m; |p from 222.2|g E2 to negative parity state; systematics of similar isomers in neighboring Pb nuclei; proposed configuration 
T$From (222.3|g,350.3|g,354.3|g,600.3|g,913.2|g,917.1|g)(t) in 1988Ro08 ({+200}Hg(|a,3n|g)). Other: |?55 ns in 1981He07 
MOMM1,MOME2$Using the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$X<70 keV in 1981He07. 
J$From systematics. Consistent with the proposed configuration and |m 
T$From (222.3|g,350.3|g,354.3|g,600.3|g,913.2|g,917.1|g)(t) in 1988Ro08 ({+200}Hg(|a,3n|g)). Other: 540 ns {I40} |g(t) in 1981He07 ({+200}Hg(|a,3n|g)) 
MOMM1$Using the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (41/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$80|g E2 to (37/2+) 
T$Unweighted average of 52 ns {I2} from |g|g(|Dt) in 2019Ro12, using 902|g-(728|g,827|g) and 447|g-(728|g,827|g) in {+197}Au({+207}Pb,X|g), 43 ns {I3} from 80.1|g(t) in 1989Su12 ({+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g)), and 43 ns {I3} from (727.7|g,287.0|g,825.6|g)(t) in 1988Ro08 ({+200}Hg(|a,3n|g)) 
MOMM1$Using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J,T$From adopted levels. 
E$Deexcites to the 2719.6-keV level via a low-energy (E|g<80 keV) |g ray 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From (222.3|g,350.3|g,354.3|g,600.3|g,913.2|g,917.1|g)(t) in 1988Ro08. Other: 55 ns in 1981He07 
$g-factor=-0.063 {I3} (1988Ro08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$1981He07 stated that X<70 keV. 
T$From (222.3|g,350.3|g,354.3|g,600.3|g,913.2|g,917.1|g)(t) in 1988Ro08. Other: 540 ns {I40} |g(t) in 1981He07; 
$g-factor=-0.0697 {I4} (1988Ro08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 41/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(|Dt) in 2019Ro12, using 902|g-(728|g,827|g) and 447|g-(728|g,827|g) 
CONF$Dominant |n (p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$From 1981Na15. Others: |?3|*10{+5} y (1954Hu61), 5.42|*10{+4} y {I24} (1979NiZV) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+208}Pb,{+202}Pb)=-0.3280 fm{+2} {I27} (1986An06). Others: 1983Th03 (same authors as 1986An06), 1985Ki03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$422.13|g E2 to 2+; L(p,t)=4 
T$From |g|g(t) in 1977Th02. Other: 2.00 ns {I15} [|g|g(t), 1959Jo21]. 
MOMM1$Using g=0.002 {I4} measured with integral perturbed angular correlation technique (1977Th02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$786.99|g E5 to 4+; L(p,t)=9 
T$Weighted average of 3.53 h {I1} (1981An11), 3.5 h {I1} (1954Ma78) and 3.62 h {I3} (1957As65) 
$%|e+%|b{++} is weighted average of 9.8% {I5} in (1957Mc40) and 9.3 % {I8} (1972Gu06). The value of 1957Mc40 is weighted average of 9.9 % {I6} (using ce data) and 9.5 % {I10} (using |g-ray data). The value of 1972Gu06 is determined from I|g(490|g)/I|g(961|g)=0.100 {I10} and |a(490|g,E2) and |a(961|g,E2) 
MOMM1,MOME2$From 1986An06, 2021StZZ (LASER spectroscopy). Other: 1983Th03 (same authors as 1986An06) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+208}Pb,{+202m}Pb)=-0.3299 fm{+2} {I27} (1986An06). Other: 1983Th03 (same authors as 1986An06) 
CONF$|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$168.11|g E2 to 5- and 825.4|g E3 to 4+ 
T$Weighted average of 65.0 ns {I5} [168.1|g(t)], 65.0 ns {I3} [422.1|g(t)], 66.7 ns {I3} [657.3|g(t)], 65.0 ns {I3} [960.7|g(t)] in 1986Ja13 and 64.5 ns {I3} (2018La03). Other: 42 ns {I4} in 1974Lu03 
CONF$|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$179.7|g stretched E1 to 11- 
T$Weighted average of 24.6 ns {I5} [179.7|g(t)], 23.4 ns {I3} [888.1|g(t)], 24.5 ns {I2} [1021.5|g(t)] in 1986Ja13 and 23.5 ns {I6} [|g-|g(|Dt)] in 2019Ro12 
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$|m; syst of similar structures in neighboring nuclei. 
T$Weighted average of 120 ns {I6} [179.7|g(t)], 108.5 ns {I20} [853.3|g(t)], 105.5 ns {I30} [888.1|g(t)] and 112 ns {I9} [1021.5|g(t)] in 1986Ja13, 93 ns {I4} [797|g-(689|g+841|g)(|Dt) and 354|g-(689|g+841|g)(|Dt)] in 2019Ro12 and 103 ns {I10} [|g(t)] in 2018La03 
MOMM1$From g=-0.042 {I10} (corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding) in 1986Ja13. 
CONF$Dominant |n(f{-5/2}{+-2},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14+
level_comment:
J$215.0|g M1(+E2) to 13+, 932.9|g E2 to 12+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level decays to the 5059.0-keV and 5242.6+x-keV levels, but the deexciting transitions are not known 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$This level decays to 5059.0 keV level, but the deexcitation transitions are not known (2000Go47). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=U;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (19-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$Based on analogy to the 19- state in {+200}Pb; |m. 
MOMM1$From g=-0.099 {I3} (corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding) in 1987Fa15 and 1987Ja08 
T$Weighted average of 107 ns {I3} [1151.0|g(t)] and 109 ns {I8} [796.6|g(t)] in 1987Fa15, 113 ns {I6} [797|g-(689|g+841|g)(|Dt) and 354|g-(689|g+841|g)(|Dt)] in 2019Ro12, and 105 ns {I38} [|g(t)] in 2018La03 
CONF$Dominant |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$From (422|g)(960|g)(|q) A{-2}=0.108 {I7} (1956Wi39) 
T$From |g|g(|Dt) in 1977Th02. Other: 2.00 ns {I15} [|g|g(t), 1959Jo21] 
MOMM1$Deduced from g=+0.002 {I4} in 1977Th02, using the integral perturbed angular correlation technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$%|e+%|b{++} is weighted average of 9.8% {I5} in (1957Mc40) and 9.3% {I8} (1972Gu06). The value in 1957Mc40 is weighted average of 9.9% {I6} (using ce data) and 9.5% {I10} (using |g-ray data). The value in 1972Gu06 is determined from I|g(490|g)/I|g(961|g)=0.100 {I10} and |a(490|g,E2)=0.0295 {I5} and |a(961|g,E2)=0.00720 {I10} 
T$Weighted average of 3.53 h {I1} (1981An11), 3.5 h {I1} (1954Ma78) and 3.62 h {I3} (1957As65) 
CONF$|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=U;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 19-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$This level de-excites to the 5242.5+x kev, 17- and the 5251.7+x-keV, 18+ levels via yet unobserved low-energy |g-ray transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$This level decays to the 5059-keV, (16) and 5242.6+x-keV, 17- levels, but the de-exciting transitions are not known 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$This level decays to the 5059-keV, (16) level, but the de-exciting transition is not known 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 65.0 ns {I5} [168.1|g(t)], 65.0 ns {I3} [422.1|g(t)], 66.7 ns {I3} [657.3|g(t)], and 65.0 ns {I3} [960.7|g(t)] in 1986Ja13. Other: 42 ns {I4} in 1974Lu03 
CONF$|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 24.6 ns {I5} [179.7|g(t)], 23.4 ns {I3} [888.1|g(t)] and 24.5 ns {I2} [1021.5|g(t)] in 1986Ja13 
CONF$|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$g=-0.042 {I10} (corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding in 1986Ja13). 
T$Weighted average of 120 ns {I6} [179.7|g(t)], 108.5 ns {I20} [853.3|g(t)], 105.5 ns {I30} [888.1|g(t)] and 112 ns {I9} [1021.5|g(t)] in 1986Ja13 
CONF$Dominant |n(f{-5/2}{+-2},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 19-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$g=-0.099 {I3} (corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding in 1987Fa15,1987Ja08). 
T$Weighted average of 107 ns {I3} [1151.0|g(t)] and 109 ns {I8} [796.6|g(t)] in 1987Fa15 
CONF$Dominant |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0; systematics of neighboring {+205}Po (N=121) isotope; |m 
T$Weighted average of 51.88 h {I2} (1980Ho17), 51.92 h {I4} (2014Un01, 2002Un02,1982HoZJ), 51.99 h {I3} (average of 51.94 h {I1}, 52.01 h {I4} and 52.02 h {I6} in 2001Li17) and 52.02 h {I5} (1971Ch54). Others: 52.1 h {I2} (1961Pe12), 52.0 h {I5} (1941Fa04), 52 h {I1} (1954Pr04) and 52.1 h {I2} (1958Ba04). 
MOMM1$Recommended in 2019StZV. |m=+0.6864 {I5} in 1986An06 using the measurement by 1983Th03 and the laser induced fluorescence technique. 
MOME2$From 1986An06, 2016St14, based on the measurement by 1983Th03 using the laser-induced fluorescence technique. 
CONF$Dominant |n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 
$|d<r{+2}>(203,208)=-0.3045 fm{+2} {I25} (1986An06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2; 126.5|g E2 to 5/2- 
T$From 126|g(t) in 1961Be29 ({+203}Bi |e decay). Superseded T{-1/2}=55 ns {I5} in 1960Be19 ({+203}Bi |e decay). 
CONF$Dominant |n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$825.2|g M4 to 5/2- 
T$Weighted average of 6.7 s {I4} (1955Fi30), 6.5 s {I5} (1956St05), 6.09 s {I10} (1957As65), 7.1 s {I5} (1958Fr53), 6.4 s {I2} (1977Li04) 
CONF$Dominant |n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J$746.45|g M1+E2 to 3/2-; 933.4|g M1 to 5/2- 
CONF$Admixture of |n(p{-1/2}{+-1})~#2{++} and |n(p{-3/2}{+-1})~#2{++} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$258.4|g E2 to 17/2+. 
T$From |g|g(t) in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) (1977Sa18) using time spectrum produced by gating on the 258.2|g (below the isomer) and 239.6|g and 873.6|g (above the isomer). Other: 56 ns {I1} from 258.2|g(t) and 838.3|g(t) in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) (1986Ja21), but this value seems to be less accurate given the possible contribution from the J|p=(25/2-) isomer (T{-1/2}=122 ns {I4}). 
MOMM1$using measured g-factor=-0.061 {I2} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) (1986Ja21,2014StZZ) with the in-beam time differential perturbed angular distribution technique. However, there is a possible contribution from the J|p=(25/2-) isomer (T{-1/2}=122 ns {I4}) 
MOME2$ From 2016St14, using the time-dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2)+
level_comment:
J$633.8|g E2+M1 to (7/2)+; 1120.2|g (M1) to 9/2+; 1506.7|g E1 to 7/2-; direct feeding in {+203}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
J$381.7|g M1(+E2) to (7/2)+; 674.8|g to (11/2)+; 1112.0|g M1(+E2) to 9/2+; 1719.7|g E1 to 9/2-; direct feeding in {+203}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2-)
level_comment:
J$880.0|g to (9/2+); 1091.7|g to (7/2)-; 1576.0|g to 9/2-; 1841.9|g to to 5/2-; direct feeding in {+203}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
J$406.3|g M1(+E2) to (9/2)+; 1246.1|g M1+E2 to 9/2+; direct feeding in {+203}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_comment:
J$634.5|g M1 to (21/2)+; 873.8|g M1+E2 to 21/2+; 678.1|g to (19/2+) 
CONF$Dominant |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-3},f{-7/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) with |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},f{-7/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2})~#2{++} admixtures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$Based on the observed delayed component for the 979.5|g, but no direct decay to the J|p=(21/2-) level is observed in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
J$Tentative assignment based on shell-model predictions 
T$From 280|g(t) and 979|g(t) in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) (1988Ro08). 
MOMM1$Using g-factor=-0.059 {I3} (1988Ro08,2014StZZ) deduced using the in-beam time differential perturbed angular distribution technique. 
CONF$|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$154.3|g E3 to 23/2+; 1027.0|g M4 to 21/2+. 
T$Weighted average from |g(t) for 838.7|g (475 ms {I12}),258.6|g (487 ms {I10}), 874.0|g (475 ms {I19}), 634.2|g (466 ms {I40}) and 153.4|g (471 ms {I71}). This value is consistent with that deduced from |g(t) for the weak 1027.5|g (441 ms {I49}), 853.8|g (535 ms {I71}) and 174.0|g (458 ms {I82}), as well as for the doublet 239.6|g (460 ms {I110}) deduced using a two isomer fit. All data are from 1977Li04 in {+204}Hg(|a,5n|g). 
CONF$|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$568.1|g E2 to (33/2+). 
T$From 568|g-1529|g(|Dt) and centroid-shift method in {+197}Au({+209}Bi,X|g) (2020Wa24) 
CONF$ Probably admixture of |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) and |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-3}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$From adopted levels 
T$Weighted average of 6.7 s {I4} (1955Fi30), 6.5 s {I5} (1956St05), 6.09 s {I10} (1957As65), 7.1 s {I5} (1958Fr53), 6.4 s {I2} (1977Li04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) in 1977Sa18 using time spectrum produced by gating on the 258.2|g (below the isomer) and 239.6|g and 873.6|g (above the isomer) Other: 56 ns {I1} from 258.2|g(t) and 838.3|g(t) in 1986Ja21. This value is assumed to be less accurate given the possible contribution from the J|p=(25/2-) isomer (T{-1/2}=122 ns {I4}). 
$g-factor=-0.061 {I2} (1986Ja21) using in-beam time differential perturbed angular distribution technique. However, there is a possible contribution from the J|p=(25/2-) isomer (T{-1/2}=122 ns {I4}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 25/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$Based on the observed delayed component for the 979.5|g, but no direct decay to the J|p=(21/2-) level is observed. 
T$From 280|g(t) and 979|g(t) in 1988Ro08. 
$g-factor=-0.059 {I3} (1988Ro08) using in-beam time differential perturbed angular distribution technique. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$Weighted average from |g(t) for 838.7|g (475 ms {I12}),258.6|g (487 ms {I10}), 874.0|g (475 ms {I19}), 634.2|g (466 ms {I40}) and 153.4|g (471 ms {I71}). This value is consistent with that deduced from |g(t) for the weak 1027.5|g (441 ms {I49}), 853.8|g (535 ms {I71}) and 174.0|g (458 ms {I82}), as well as for the doublet 239.6|g (460 ms {I110}) deduced using a two isomer fit. All data are from 1977Li04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 2020Wa24, time distribution of 568- and 1529-keV |g rays, and centroid-shift analysis 
$Configuration=|ni{-13/2}{+-3}~#|nf{-5/2}{+-1}~#|np{-1/2}{+-1} with possible admixture of |ni{-13/2}{+-3}~#|np{-3/2}{+-1}~#|np{-1/2}{+-1} (2020Wa24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
T$1958Ri23 and 1966Ka23 report |a decay with T{-1/2}=1.4|*10{+17} y and E(|a)=2600 keV; however, this disagrees with adopted Q(|a)=1969.5 keV 12. 
$Charge radius measured: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.4795 fm 15 from (e,e) (1978Eu01) 
$Charge radius differences measured: |D<r{+2}>({+204}Pb,{+206}Pb)=-0.101 fm{+2} 17 combining x-ray and optical shifts (1973Le16), -0.105 fm{+2} 2 from collinear laser spectroscopy (1987Di06); |D<r{+2}>({+204}Pb,{+208}Pb)=-0.2231 fm{+2} 18 from laser spectroscopy (1986An06), -0.2080 fm{+2} 23 from atomic-beam laser resonance (1983Th03), -0.220 fm{+2} 9 from isotope shifts of K| x ray (1983Bo08), -0.238 fm{+2} 5 from optical isotope shifts (2005Wa34). 
$Isotope shifts measured: with above methods (1973Le16, 1986An06, 1987Di06, 1983Th03, 2005Wa34), muonic x rays (1975Ke05), two-photon laser spectroscopy (1980Ti04). 
$Neutron density radius relative to protons deduced: |Dr{-n-p}=0.22 fm 9 (1976Gi05), reanalysis of same data with different potential |Dr{-n-p}=0.0 fm 1 (1977Fr15). 
$Charge density measured with (e,e) (1987Ca02). 
$Penning trap mass measurement (2001Sc41). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$Other: 1980Ho19 measure E=897.17 {I13}, an isomer shift of -2.0 keV, in muonic atom. 
J$L=2 in (d,d'), (|a,|a'), (p,t); 899.15|g E2 to 0+ 
$B(E2)|^=0.166 {I2} (1978Jo04). Others: 0.166 {I9} (1974Ol02), 0.151 {I15} (1972Ha59), 0.146 {I15} (1971Gr31), and 0.174 (1984Pa02); ratio of B(E2)|^({+204}Pb)/B(E2)|^({+206}Pb)=1.7 {I2} (1962Na06), 1.7 (1965An13). 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.166 {I2} (1978Jo04) 
MOME2$From Coulomb excitation reorientation. Other: +0.19 {I14} (1974Ol02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L=4 in (p,t), (d,d'); 374.76|g E2 to 2+. 
T$Weighted average of 258 ns {I12} (1963Sa19), 280 ns {I12} (1967Li12) and 260 ns {I10} (1978So02) in {+204}Pb IT decay. 
MOMM1$Weighted average of +0.216 {I20} (1955Kr06) by angular correlation attenuation, +0.226 {I8} (1963Sa19) and +0.220 {I12} (1967Li12) by differential angular correlation method, and +0.224 {I4} (1974Lu03) by TDPAD. 
$B(E4): from (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$361.1|g and 813.1|g D(+Q)'s to 2+ levels and 438.0|g to 4+ imply J|p=2+,3; 438.0|g(|q) most likely rules out stretched E2, E1; Also, 604.0|g (M1+E2) from 2316.29-keV 2+ level favors |p=(+); nonobservation in (d,d') and in (p,t) favors unnatural parity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J$1049.2|g M1+E2 (|DJ=1) to 2+, 674.1|g (M1+E2) to 4+. 
J$Not clear from 1989DeZT which G's they measured polarizations for, so hard to base arguments on that! 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$883.8|g to 4+; 1258.9|g to 2+; possible feeding by 934.13|g from the 5- level at 3092 keV favors 4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$622.2|g and 911.74|g E5's to 4+ levels, L=9 in (p,t), (d,d'). 
$Proposed configuration=|n[(f{-5/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-1}] 
T$Weighted average of 67.5 min {I5} (1956He50), 66.9 min {I1} (1958Ba04), 66 min {I3} (1972Si22), 67.2 min {I9} (1977SmZV), and 68.4 min {I24} (2001Li17) in {+204}Pb IT decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$440.46|g E1 to 4+; 983.98|g E1(+M2) to 4+; L=5 in (p,t) (doublet with 2264.43-keV level); direct population in {+204}Bi |e decay (J|p=6+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$78.54|g E2 to 9-; 990.4|g E3 to 4+ 
T$from {+204}Bi |e decay (1978So02) 
$Possible configuration=|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-1}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_comment:
J$80.15|g M1(+E2) to 5- and 1064.32|g E1+M2 to 4+ implies J|p=4-,5-; however, a 5- assignment requires |d(1064.32)=0.3, which is ruled out by |a(K)exp in {+204}Bi |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3)
level_comment:
J$1173.7|g and 1625.7|g to 2+. I|g(1173.7|g) and I|g(1625.7|g) consistent with the two transitions being dipoles 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$L=3 in (p,t), (d,d'), (|a,|a'). 
$|b{-3}=0.0878 {I14} (1976Gi10) and 0.121 (1994Hi01) 
$B(E3): from 1978Sp08 in Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
J$1155.9|g M1+E2 to 4+; 1155.9|g(|q) in (n,n'|g) favors |DJ=1 transition; direct population in {+204}Bi |e decay (J|p=6+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
J$L=6 in (p,t). 
$Proposed dominant configuration=|n[(f{-5/2}){+-1}(f{-7/2}){+-1}](|n{+- \2}){-0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$1111.35|g and 1654.79|g E1(+M2)'s to 4+ levels; strong population in {+204}Bi |e decay (J|p=6+) favors 5- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_comment:
J$246.2|g M1+E2 to 10-; 1005.7|g E2 to 9- 
$Proposed configuration=|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(f{-5/2}){+-2}(i{-13/2}){+-1}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
E$from (p,t); two nearby levels were observed in (d,d') at 3799 and 3824 keV, but it is not clear which, if either, corresponds to this level. 
J$L=2 in (p,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_comment:
J$1569.3|g M1(+E2) to 5-; 971.21|g to 6-; 2802.1|g to 4+; direct feeding in {+204}Bi |e decay (J|p=6+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_comment:
J$585.7|g M1+E2 to 15+; 752.9|g E2 to 14+ 
$Proposed configuration=|n[(f{-5/2}){+-2}(i{-13/2}){+-2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_comment:
J$1046.7|g M1(+E2) to 15+; 1214.0|g E2(+M3) to 14+ 
$Proposed configuration=|n[(f{-5/2}){+-1}(p{-3/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (20)
level_comment:
J$1304.1|g D+Q to 19- 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(h{-9/2})(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}(i{-13/2}){+ \-2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21)
level_comment:
J$447.1|g D+Q to (20) 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(h{-9/2})(h{-11/2}){+-1}]|n[(p{-1/2}){+-2}(i{-13/2}){+ \-2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (22)
level_comment:
J$276.7|g D+Q to 21 
$Proposed configuration=|p[(h{-9/2})(h{-11/2}){+-1}] |n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(f{-5/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 258 ns {I12} (1963Sa19), 280 ns {I12} (1967Li12), 260 ns 10 (1978So02). 
$Q=0.68 {I15} from |g|g(t) of {+204}Pb implanted in crystal, TDPAC method (1974He16). 
$|m=+0.224 {I6} from weighted average of +0.216 {I20} (1955Kr06) by angular correlation attenuation, +0.226 {I8} (1963Sa19) and +0.220 {I12} (1967Li12) by differential angular correlation method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$From adopted levels 
T$Weighted average of 67.5 min {I5} (1956He50), 66.9 min {I1} (1958Ba04), 66 min {I3} (1972Si22), 67.2 min {I9} (1977SmZV), 68.4 min {I24} (2001Li17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$From the adopted decay scheme there is a 5.4% {I21} |g+ce imbalance; this is probably due to unplaced gammas. Feeding to this isomeric level cannot be detected by |g|g-coin measurements across the isomer because of its long lifetime. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) of 246.2|g, 759.8|g, and 1005.7|g determine J, whereas parity assignment by 1978Li01 was taken from comparison with shell model; however, it is unlikely that the 759.8|g has mult M2+E1 with so large an M2 component. Thus, the parity is also experimentally established. 
$Proposed configuration=|n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(f{-5/2}){+-2}(i{-13/2}){+-1}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (22)
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=|p[(h{-9/2})(h{-11/2}){+-1}] |n[(p{-1/2}){+-1}(f{-5/2}){+-1}(i{-13/2}){+-2}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2(+),3(+)
level_comment:
J$J=2,3 established by 361.1- and 813.1-keV D's to 2+ levels; 604.0-keV (M1+E2) from 2316.3-keV, 2+ level fixes |p=(+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) in 1988Ha16 indicate J|p=2+,3+, but the authors conclude it must be 2+ based on L=2 in (p,t) studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
J$J=4,5 from 1988Ha16. If J=5 then |d(1063.8|g)=0.3, which is excluded by |a(K)exp in {+204}Bi |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$1988Ha16 argue that this level does not involve intruder orbitals but can be described within the valence shell-model space, contrary to the conclusions of 1986Ka07 in (p,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3
level_comment:
J$1988Ha16 assigned J|p=2,3,4; evaluator further constrains J|p based on 1650.6-keV D(+Q) to 2+ and 1275.6|g to 4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$1721|g(|q) implies J=3; large n inelastic scattering cross section indicates strong collective nature of 3- level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$From adopted levels. 1994Hi01 present d|s/d|W results for the 3{-1}- level but do not quote E(level). 
$|b{-3}=0.121 coupling parameter fitted in 1994Hi01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$BE2UP=0.09(4) (eb)^2 corresponding to (beta2*R)^2=0.044 (beta2^2=2spu) from DW fit in 1967Bj01. 
E$Predominantly four-hole level, contains some collective strength. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$From 1981Ba45; strongly excited in 1971GrXR. 
$|b{-2}=0.039 from coupled-channels analysis (1981Ba45); other: 1967Al14. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$From 1981Ba45; strongly excited in 1971GrXR. 
$|b{-3}=0.0878 {I14} from coupled-channels analysis, 0.121 {I3} from folded-model analysis (1976Gi10); other: 1967Al14, 1981Ba45. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$From 1972Ha59. 
T$From adopted levels. 
$B(E2)|^=0.166 {I2} (1978Jo04), 0.166 {I9} (1974Ol02). Others: 0.151 {I15} (1972Ha59), 0.146 {I15} (1971Gr31), ratio of B(E2)|^({+204}Pb)/B(E2)|^({+206}Pb)=1.7 {I2} (1962Na06), 1.7 (1965An13). 
$Q=+0.22 {I8} [weighted average of +0.23 {I9} (1978Jo04) and +0.19 {I14} (1974Ol02)]. Analysis by 1978Jo04 accounts for influence of 3- (using the 3- to 2+ B(E1) from {+206}Pb) and 4+ levels. 
$|m<0.02 (1974Ol02,1986Bi13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1988Ha16 in (n,n'|g) report J|p=2+ for a level at 1582.8, and suggest that the 1582.7 E0 is due to an impurity; however, 1989Tr14 establish by (p,p') that there is a doublet at 1582 keV, conclusively refuting the suggestion of 1988Ha16. 1989Tr14 determine E(level)=1582.4 {I7} for the 0+ level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$Only one level indicated by 1977La10, but probably unresolved 0+ and 2+ levels (see adopted levels). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
E$Probably the 2405.0, 7- level; possibly admixed with the 2385.9, 5+ level [says NDS94...but 5+ unnatural!] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_comment:
L$Deduced to be tentatively L=(11) in 1974Or01 and 1983Ta05, but there is good agreement between the L=11 DWBA calculations and the data in these two works as well as in 1980KuZT, hence a firm L assignment has been adopted. 
$Proposed configuration=|n[(i{-13/2}){+-1}(h{-9/2}){+-1}](|n{+-2}){-0+}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$How did they get a correlated PI - G event across a ~1h isomer?? Are they just counting randoms some indefinite time after the PI stop? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$L=3 in {+204}Pb(d,p) and {+206}Pb(p,d); |m; systematics of single-particle states in the region 
T$Using T{-1/2}(|eL)=2.83|*10{+7} y {I14}, deduced from {+205}Pb/{+204}Pb=0.005068 {i62} and L-xray counting rate of 15.2 {i4} dpm (1958Wi40), |w(L)=0.367 {I15} (1996Sc06), and theoretical |eL/(|e+|b{++})=0.5992 {I14}, deduced using Q(|e)=50.6 keV {I5} (2017Wa10). 
MOMM1$Using the laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy in thermal atomic beam technique (1986An06,2014StZZ). Others: 0.6946 {I8} (1982Th05) and 0.704 {I5} (1987Ba85). 
MOME2$Using the laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy in thermal atomic beam technique (1986An06,2016St14). Others: 0.2 {I4} (1987Ba85). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+208}Pb,{+205}Pb)=-0.2032 {I35} (1982Th05) and -0.1967 {I16} (1986An06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$L=1 in {+206}Pb(p,d) and {+204}Pb(d,p); 2.328|g E2 to 5/2-. 
T$From |a-e{+-}(|Dt) in 1994Kr11 ({+209}Po |a decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$26.22|g M2 to 9/2- level; 310.35|g E3 to 7/2- level; 1013.8|g M4 to 5/2-; L=6 in {+204}Pb(d,p) and {+206}Pb(p,d). 
T$From 987.5|g(t) in 1971Ma59 ({+204}Hg(|a,3n|g)). Others: 5.54 ms {I10} (1973Sa22), 4.15 ms {I15} (1960Be19), 4.8 ms {I15} (1960Ve04), |?4.9 ms (1994Po20). 
MOMM1$Using differential perturbed angular distributions technique (1971Ma59,2014StZZ). 
MOME2$Using quadrupole interaction observed by relaxation time measurements technique (1975Ri03,2016St14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$115.10|g M1+E2 to 7/2-; 349.55|g M1+E2 to 5/2-; 570.60|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-; 626.71|g M1+E2 to 9/2-; 910.90|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-; 1351.52|g E2 to 3/2-; 1614.30|g M1+E2 to 5/2-; L=3 in {+204}Pb(d,p) and {+206}Pb(p,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$170.8|g to 9/2+, 1501.40|g (E2) to 3/2-, 1764.30|g M1+E2 to 5/2-; L=3 in {+204}Pb(d,p) and {+206}Pb(p,d); direct feeding in {+205}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$788.13|g to 9/2-, 1014.30|g M1+E2 to 5/2-, 1199.62|g to 3/2-; direct feeding in {+205}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-)
level_comment:
J$1815.6|g to 1/2-, 1818.0|g to 5/2-; 703.4|g from (5/2-,7/2-); no direct feeding in {+205}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J$444.8|g to 9/2+, 704.86|g to 9/2-, 1190.03|g M1+E2 to 13/2+; direct feeding in {+205}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J$757.09|g to 7/2-, 1760.0|g to 5/2-; L=3 in {+206}Pb(p,d); direct feeding in {+205}Bi |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$1551.0|g E2 to 13/2+; 1861.7|g E1(+M2) to 7/2-; 2565.1|g M2 to 5/2-; L=3 in {+205}Pb(d,d'); Ay(|q) in {+204}Pb(d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$1013.40|g M1+E2 to 9/2+, 764.99|g to (13/2)+, 1903.45|g E1(+M2) to 7/2-, 2607.7|g M2 to 5/2-; Ay(|q) in {+204}Pb(d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E$ Doublet (2702 keV {I5} and 2711 keV {I5} in {+205}Pb(d,d') 
J$L=(3) in {+205}Pb(d,d'); 2004.3|g to 7/2-; Ay(|q) in {+204}Pb(d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$1175.1|g E3 to 19/2+; 27.8|g to 21/2-. 
T$From 684|g(t) in 1976Li09 ({+204}Hg(|a,3n|g)(1976Li09)). Others: 226 ns {I17} from |g(t) in 1973Be32 and 217 ns (1994Po20) 
MOMM1$Using differential perturbed angular distribution technique (1976Li09,2014StZZ), 
MOME2$Using differential perturbed angular distribution technique (2016St14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M4
level_comment:
J$97.1|g E2 to 29/2+; 1251.7|g to (27/2-); 1535.6|g to 29/2-. 
T$ From 1535.6|g(t) in 1983St15. Others: 71 ns {I3} from 430.4|g(t) in 1976Li09 and 63 ns (1994Po20). 
MOMM1$From g=-0.148 {I5} using differential perturbed angular distribution technique (1983St15,2014StZZ). Other: -2.59 {I13} (g=-0.159 {I8}) using the perturbed angular distributions technique (1976Li09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From 987.5|g(t) in 1971Ma59. 
$|m=-0.975 {I40} (g=-0.150 {I6}) using differential perturbed angular distributions technique (1971Ma59). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 684|g(t) in 1976Li09. Others: 226 ns {I17} from |g(t) in 1973Be32. 
$|m=-0.845 {I14} (g=-0.0676 {I11}) using the perturbed angular distribution technique (1976Li09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 33/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ From 1535.6|g(t) in 1983St15. Other: 71 ns {I3} from 430.4|g(t) in 1976Li09. 
$|m=-2.44 {I8} (g=-0.148 {I5}) using the perturbed angular distribution technique (1983St15). Others: -2.59 {I13} (g=-0.159 {I8}) using the perturbed angular distributions technique (1976Li09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
T$T{-1/2}(SF)>1.0|*10{+23} y from search for fission product tracks in old Pb samples (1970Pr15). T{-1/2}(|a)>2.5|*10{+21} from search for 1135.5 keV |a decay events in 2013Be16 (90% C.L. level) 
$|D<r{+2}>(208,206)=0.127 {I3} fm{+2} (2005Wa34). Several articles contain information on isotope shifts and related quantities: shift of K and L x-ray energies (1973Le16,1981BoZQ); shift of optical line energies (1980Ti04,1982ReZV,1986Bo18,1988Bu20); shift in charge radius (1973Le16,1981BoZQ,1982ReZV,1983Th03,1986An06, 1987Di06,1988Ga27,1990Di09,1991Re08); and shift in energies of x rays in muonic atoms (1966Eh01,1969An26,1975Ke05,1984Ho15). The energies of the x rays from muonic atoms are given by 1966Ac02, 1969An02, and 1973Ma45. Other muonic atom articles: 1969Fo11, 1974Fo09 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-2) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 54 TO 65% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1962Mu05,1968Ti01,1968Ri11) AND 64 AND 68% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). THE OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (F5/2,-2) FROM 16 TO 25%; (P3/2,-2) FROM 12 TO 20%; (I13/2,-2) FROM 1.2 TO 12%; AND (F7/2,-2) FROM 1.7 TO 3%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$803.06|g E2 to 0+; L=2 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), {+208}Pb(p,t) and {+204}Pb(t,p) 
BE2$Weighted average of 0.090 {I13} (1992Ho08) in {+206}Pb(|p,|p') and 0.103 {I1} (1978Jo04), 0.108 {I10} (1966Hr01), 0.103 {I8} (1971Gr31) and 0.095 {I5} (1972Ha59) in Coulomb excitation. Others: 0.0957 (1984Pa02) in {+206}Pb(e,e'), 0.100 (1991Ho13) in ({+17}O,{+17}O') and 0.12 {I3} (1955St57), 0.115 (1960BaZZ) and 0.13 {I5} (1962Na06) in Coulomb excitation. 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.1027 {I10} (recommended here). Others: 9.1 ps {I6} (1970Qu02) and 12 ps {I3} (2019Ra28) using the Recoil Distance Doppler Shift technique 
MOME2$From 1978Jo04, 2021StZZ in Coulomb excitation 
MOMM1$From 1986Bi13,2020StZV (98% confidence level), reevaluation of the original data of 1974Ol02 (g=0.07 {I+7-3}) in Coulomb excitation. Other: |m=-0.02 {I14} from g=-0.01 {I7} using |g|g perturbed angular correlation in 1970Za03 [{+206}Bi |e decay] 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS DEDUCED TO BE 68% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01) AND 50 AND 52% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (P1/2,-1)(P3/2,-1) FROM 22 TO 29%; (F5/2,-2,2+) 8%; AND (P3/2,-2,2+) 4%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$1166.4-keV E0 transition to 0+; L=0 in {+208}Pb(p,t), {+204}Pb(t,p) and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
T$Weighted average of 0.67 ns {I7} (1972Ta18) and 0.77 ns {I4} (1976Ju03) in {+206}Pb(p,p'|g) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-2}) 
CONF$THE (F5/2,-2) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS DEDUCED TO 48% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01) AND 56 AND 70% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (P1/2,-2) FROM 22 TO 30%; AND (P3/2,-2) 0.8 TO 1.6%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J$537.5|g M1(+E2) to 2+ level; L(p,d)=3 and L({+3}He,d)=2 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 100 TO 112% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01,1968Ri11) AND 99.6 OR 100% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$663.75|g M1+E2 to 2+; 1466.78|g to 0+; L=2 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), {+208}Pb(p,t) and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},p{-3/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(P3/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS DEDUCED TO BE 61 AND 86% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01,1968Ri11) AND 53 AND 59% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). OTHER COMPONENT IS (P1/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) FROM 38 TO 43%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$343.55|g M1(+E2) to 3+, 880.92|g E2 to 2+; L=4 in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+208}Pb(p,t) 
BE4$From {+206}Pb(e,e') (1984Pa02) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P3/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 53 AND 61% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02) AS QUOTED IN 1965Lo05. OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (F5/2,-2) 31 AND 32%; (P1/2,-1)(F7/2,-1) 3.4 AND 9%; (P3/2,-1)(F7/2,-1) 2.2%; AND (F5/2,-1)(F7/2,-1),4+ 1.6 AND 1.8%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1704.45|g to 0+; L(p,d)=1 and L({+3}He,d)=0 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},p{-3/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(P3/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 100 AND 102% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01,1968Ri11) AND 99.0 AND 100% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). OTHER COMPONENT IS (F5/2,-1)(F7/2,-1) AT 1.0%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$980.99|g M1+E2 to 2+; 1784.7|g to 0+; L=2 in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-2}) 
CONF$THE (F5/2,-2),2+ COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03,1983Ri05). OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (P1/2,-1)(P3/2,-1) AND (P1/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) (1977Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$313.67|g M1+E2 to 4+, 1194.68|g E2 to 2+; L=4 in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+208}Pb(p,t) 
$Dominant configuration: probably a mixture of |n(p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1}) and |n(f{-5/2}{+-2}) 
CONF$THE (P3/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) AND (F5/2,-2),4+ COMPONENTS OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAVE BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03,1983Ri05). ANOTHER COMPONENT IS (P1/2,-1)(F7/2,-1) (1977Va09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$808.58|g M1+E2 to 3+; L=2 in {+208}Pb(p,t) and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P3/2,-1)(F5/2,-1),2+ COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03). OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (P1/2,-1)(P3/2,-1) AND (P1/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) (1977Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$516.18|g E3 to 4+; L=7 in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+208}Pb(p,t). 
T$Weighted average of 125 |ms {I19} (1995An36), 126 |ms {I6} (1966MoZZ), 119 |ms {I3} (1973DaZL), 125 |ms {I2} (1973Sa22), 128 |ms {I5} (1957To22), 123 |ms {I4} (1957As65), 123 |ms {I3} (1960Be36), 130.5 |ms {I15} (1962Th12), and 123.3 |ms {I11} (1968Ta13). Others: 145 |ms {I15} (1953Al47), 141 |ms {I7} (1967Co20), 124 |ms (1994Po20) 
MOMM1$From g=-0.0217 {I4} in 1972Ma24,2020StZV. Other: -0.24 {I14} in 1970Qu03. 
MOME2$From 1975Ri03,2021StZZ using quadrupole interaction deduced from relaxation time technique. Others: 0.5 {I2} (1973DiZE) and |<0.2 (1970Qu03). 
$Dominant configuration=|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(I13/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 124% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01) AND 91 AND 94% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$L=0 in {+208}Pb(p,t) and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Dominant configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-2}) 
CONF$THE (P3/2,-2) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03). OTHER COMPONENT IS (P1/2,-2) (1977Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$184.02|g M1(+E2) to 7-; L=6 in {+207}Pb(p,d) 
T$From 1963Si12 
MOMM1$From g=+0.13 {I7} using |g|g perturbed angular correlation (1970Za03) 
$Dominant configuration=|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$718.92|g to 1+, 1082.7|g to 3+; L=2 in {+208}Pb(p,t) 
$Dominant configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-2}) 
CONF$THE (P3/2,-2),2+ COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03). OTHER COMPONENTS ARE (P1/2,-1)(P3/2,-1) AND (P1/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) (1977Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1844.49|g E1 to 2+, 963.82|g to 4+; L=3 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), {+206}Pb(d,d') and {+208}Pb(p,t) 
$Dominant configuration: octupole vibration coupled to the |n(p{-1/2}{+-2}) ground state 
T$From 1972Ha59 using DSAM in Coulomb excitation. Other: 0.28 ps {I14} (1971Gr31) using DSAM in Coulomb excitation. 
BE3$From 1968Zi02 in {+206}Pb(e,e'). Others: 0.66 {I7} (1971Gr31), 0.50 {I3} (1972Ha59), 0.60 {I4} or 0.65 {I4} (1978Sp08) 0.83 {I+18-25} (1966Hr01) and 0.35 {I2} (1998Wo15) from Coulomb excitation; 0.61 (1991Ho13) in ({+17}O,{+17}O'); 0.62 {I9} (1982Ho08) in (|p,|p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$581.97|g E2 to 7-, 784.58|g E1 to 4+; L=5 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), {+208}Pb(p,t) and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (F5/2,-1)(I13/2,-1),5- COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03,1983Ri05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_comment:
J$44.11|g M1(+E2) to 5-, 442.14|g (E2) to 6-, 1142.37|g E1 to 4+ 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J$664.17|g M1(+E2), |DJ=0 to 7-; L=7 in {+208}Pb(p,t) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (F5/2,-1)(I13/2,-1),7- COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03). ANOTHER COMPONENT IS (P1/2,-1)(I13/2,-1) (1977Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$1588.59|g M1 to 3+ level; L=4 in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+208}Pb(p,t) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-7/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(F7/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 86% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01) AND 80 AND 81% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02, 1973Ma42). OTHER COMPONENT IS (P3/2,-1)(F5/2,-1) AT 13%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_comment:
J$157.52|g M1(+E2) to 5-, 739.24|g M1 to 7- 
$Dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (F5/2,-1)(I13/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1961Gu03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$1332.33|g E1 to 4+, 632.25|g M1+E2 to 6-; L=5 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), {+208}Pb(p,t), and {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P3/2,-1)(I13/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1983Ri05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$2319.32|g to 2+; L=3 in {+207}Pb(p,d); |s(|q) in {+208}Pb(p,t). 
$Dominant configuration: |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-7/2}{+-1}) 
CONF$THE (P1/2,-1)(F7/2,-1) COMPONENT OF THE WAVE FUNCTION HAS BEEN DEDUCED TO BE 106% FROM MEASUREMENTS (1968Ti01) AND 98 AND 100% FROM MODEL CALCULATIONS (1968Tr02,1973Ma42). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$1595.27|g E1 to 4+, 895.12 M1+E2 to 6-; L=5 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) 
$Probable dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$1405.01|g E1 to 4+, 1018.63|g M1(+E2) to 6-; L=5 in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+206}Pb(d,d') 
$Probable dominant configuration: |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$2713|g to 2+; L=4 in {+208}Pb(p,t). Note, that L=(5) in {+206}Pb(p,p') would require J|p=4-, 5- or 6- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$L=3 in {+206}Pb(p,p'), analyzing power in (pol p,|a); L=3 in {+205}Tl({+3}He,d) would require J|p=(3,4)- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+ and 4+ levels suggest J|p=2+, 3+, 3-, or 4+; but L=(0) in (p,d) suggests J|p=0- or 1-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$1369.0|g E3 to 9-; 69.7|g E2 to 10+; L(p,t)=12 
T$Weighted average of 205 ns {I4} [1993Bl02,458.1|g(t)], 185 ns {I15} [1983St15,|g(t)], 198 ns {I6} [1979Ma37,|g(t)], and 200 ns {I14} [1971Be37,|g(t)]. Others: 424 ns {I35} [1971Be37,70|g(t)], 379 ns {I31} [1971Be37,1369|g(t)], 203 ns {I28} [2018La03,458|g,1299|g,1369|g(t)] 
MOMM1$From g=-0.1496 {I18} in 1983St15,2019StZV. Others: |m=-1.86 {I5} from g=-0.155 {I4} in 1972Na08 
MOME2$Based on Q({+200}Pb,12+)/Q({+206}Pb,12+)=1.553 {I10} (1979Ma37) 
$Dominant configuration: |n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-)
level_comment:
J$From analyzing power in (pol p,|a); 3242|g to 2+; L=(6,7) in {+206}Pb(p,p') would suggest J=6,7, but the level could be a doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$J|p=2+ in {+206}Pb(e,e') and L=2 in {+206}Pb(p,p') 
BE2$From {+206}Pb(e,e') in 1968Zi02. Others: 0.26 in Coulomb excitation and 0.19 {I3} (1992Ho08) in {+206}Pb(|p,|p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$L=(4) in {+206}Pb(p,p') and {+208}Pb(p,t), but J|p=(3-,4-) from analyzing power in {+209}Bi(pol p,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J$L=5 in {+204}Pb(t,p); L=(3) in {+205}Tl({+3}He,d). However, L=(2) in {+206}Pb(p,p') would suggest that the level may be a multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$From {+206}Pb(e,e'), but J|p=(5-) from L=(5) in {+206}Pb(p,p'). This level could be a doublet. 
BE2$From {+206}Pb(e,e') (1987Sc19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_comment:
J$1190.3|g M1+E2, |DJ=0 to 12+ 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$From {+206}Pb(e,e'); L=(2) in {+204}Pb(t,p); L=(3) in {+207}Pb(p,d) 
BE2$From {+206}Pb(e,e') (1987Sc19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14+
level_comment:
J$250.8|g M1 to 13+, 816.5|g E2 to 12+. 
$Possible configuration= |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)
level_comment:
J$From {+206}Pb(|g,|g'), but E2 excitation in {+206}Pb(e,e') would require J|p=2+ [B(E2)|^=0.0185 {I7}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$From {+206}Pb(|g,|g'), L=2 in {+204}Pb(t,p) and E2 excitation in {+206}Pb(e,e'). 
BE2$From {+206}Pb(e,e') (1987Sc19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_comment:
J$348.4|g to 14+ 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},d{-3/2}{+-1}) |n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$From E2 excitation in {+206}Pb(e,e'), but J=1 in {+206}Pb(|g,|g') 
BE2$From {+206}Pb(e,e') (1987Sc19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15-)
level_comment:
J$531.1|g (E1) to 14+. 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (16-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$From {+204}Hg({+9}Be,|a3n|g) 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (19+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From {+204}Hg({+9}Be,|a3n|g) 
J$97.3|g E1 to (18-). 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1})|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
MOMM1$From g=-0.0217 {I4} by 1972Ma24. Other: -0.24 {I14} (1970Qu03). 
MOME2$From 1973DiZE. Other: |<0.2 (1970Qu03) 
$Dominant configuration=|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 200 ns {I14} (1971Be37), 198 ns {I6} (1979Ma37), 185 ns {I15} (1983St15), 205 ns {I4} (1993Bl02). Other: 203 ns {I28} (2018La03) 
MOMM1$Based on g-factor=-0.1496 {I18} (1983St15). Other: |m=-1.86 {I5} from g-factor=-0.155 {I4} (1972Na08). 
MOME2$Based on Q({+200}Pb,12+)/Q({+206}Pb,12+)=1.553 {I10} (1979Ma37). 
$Dominant configuration=|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$Values from {+206}Bi |e decay are 145 |ms {I15} (1953Al47), 128 |ms {I5} (1957To22), 123 |ms {I4} (1957As65), 123 |ms {I3} (1960Be36), 130.5 |ms {I15} (1962Th12), and 123.3 |ms {I11} (1968Ta13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$The level is interpreted as a proton-pairing vibration state, with 70% of the theoretical strength being accounted for. Another 12% of the L=0 strength might be associated with the 2400 level. 
L$Small amount of L=2 transfer, presumably due to higher-J states, is also reported by 1977An19 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Measured values in (|a,2n) are: 205 ns {I4} [1993Bl02,458.1|g(t)], 185 ns {I15} [1983St15,|g(t)], 198 ns {I6} [1979Ma37,|g(t)], and 200 ns {I14} [1971Be37,|g(t)]. Note that T{-1/2}=424 ns {I35} [70|g(t)] and 379 ns {I31} [1369|g(t)] are also reported in 1971Be37 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 16(-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$State predicted by theory. 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1}) |n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From 1996Ra16 and includes the uncertainty from calibration E|g's 
J$Neutron capture on J|p=5/2- state in {+205}Pb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$5083 keV {I1} in 1986Ra01 seems a typo 
S$Other: 2.12 {I21} (2003En07), 2.6 {I4} (1980Ch22), 2.3 {I5} (1974Sw05), 1.6 {I6} (1977Co10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_comment:
E,S$Other: 7310 keV and |G{+2}{-|g0}/|G {-|g}=1.8 {I4} (1980Ch22) for both the 7302.6- and 7312.6-keV levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Authors give the level energy as 5480, but this appears to be an error; evaluator assigned 5580 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From 1970Qu02 using the recoil-distance Doppler shift technique. 
BE2$0.103 {I1} (1978Jo04), 0.12 {I3} (1955St57), 0.115 (1960BaZZ), 0.13 {I5} (1962Na06), 0.108 {I10} (1966Hr01), 0.103 {I8} (1971Gr31), 0.095 {I5} (1972Ha59) and 0.100 (1991Ho13). Also 1965An13 gives ratio of B(E2) values for the first 2+ states in {+204}Pb and {+206}Pb. 
MOME2$+0.05 {I9} from 1978Jo04. 
$g-factor=0.07 {I+7-3} from 1974Ol02. Re-analysis of the data of 1974Ol02 gives g-factor<0.015 at 98% confidence level (1986Bi13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From 1972Ha59. Other: 0.28 ps {I14} (1971Gr31). Both values deduced using Doppler shift attenuation technique. 
BE3$0.66 {I7} (1971Gr31), 0.50 {I3} (1972Ha59), 0.60 {I4} or 0.65 {I4} (1978Sp08), 0.83 {I+18-25} (1966Hr01), 0.61 (1991Ho13), and 0.35 {I2} (1998Wo15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J$Also analyzing power in 2001Mi33 
L$From 2001Mi33; L=(7) is assigned in 1970Sm06 and 1977La10, but L=5 in 1985Wi12 
$Dominant configuration=|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_comment:
E,J,L$From 2001Mi33. Other: E=4560 keV and J|p=7- in 1983Ta05 
$Dominant configuration=|n(f{-7/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_comment:
E,J,L$From 1983Ta05. Other: E=5390 keV {I35} and J|p=11- in 1989Ge03 
$Dominant configuration=|n(h{-9/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_comment:
E,J,L$From 2001Mi33. Other: E=6100 keV {I40} and J|p=8+,(9-) in 1989Ge03 and E=6200 keV and J|p=9- in 1983Ta05 
$Dominant configuration=|n(h{-9/2}{+-1},f{-7/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$Other: 1170 keV {I3} in 1983Fi10 
T$Weighted average of 0.67 ns {I7} (1972Ta18) and 0.77 ns {I4} (1976Ju03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$Optical spectroscopy (1931Mu02,1932Ko01), NMR (1950Pr51, see also 1976Fu06), Atomic and Molecular beams (1970Lu05); L(d,p),(p,d),(d,t), ({+3}He,|a)=1 
MOMM1$+0.592583 {I9} (1971Lu06) using NMR technique and 0.58219 {I2} (1969Gi04) using optical pumping with radioactive detection technique. Both values include a diamagnetic shielding correction, but not corrected chemical shifts. Recommended value in 1998Gu22 is +0.5925 {I6} 
CONF$|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 
$Isotope shifts (IS) have been measured and charge distribution deduced from muonic x-rays (1975Ke05; see also 1974Fo09,1973Le16); with optical two-photon spectroscopy (1980Ti04). IS have been measured for K x-rays and compared to theory (1983Bo08,1985Ki03). See also 1991Re08 for a discussion of the relevance to parity conservation. Optical isotope shifts and hyperfine structure (HFS) have been measured with LASER resonance fluorescence from atomic beams (1982Th05,1983Th03,1988Bu20,1992Fe08); Other IS and HFS measurements: 2000Bo54, 2005Wa06, 2005Wa22, 1998Se25, 1998Se22. 
$Charge distribution and isotope shifts have been calculated from electron scattering and muonic x-rays (1978Eu01). Charge density has been deduced from electron scattering (1987Ca02) 
$Isomer shifts in muonic-atoms have been analyzed for the 5/2-, 3/2-, and 7/2- states in {+207}Pb (1971Ri14,1983AnZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2; L(d,p),L(p,d),L({+3}He,|a),L(d,t)=3; 569.698|g E2 to 1/2-; Atomic and Molecular beams (1961Ax02) 
T$Weighted average of 130.2 ps {I15} (1971Ba32), 130.5 ps {I15} and 130.7 ps {I13} (1977Ku09). Others: 129 ps {I3} (1966Ko16), 129 ps {I3} (1974Aw01), 128 ps {I5} (1966Go35), 134 ps {I9} (1964Ro19), 110 ps {I11} (1963Le15), 129 ps {I3} (1978De14). All values are from {+207}Bi |e decay. 130 ps {I4} from B(E2)|^ in Coulomb Excitation 
BE2$0.213 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0214 {I10} (1972Ha59), 0.0210 {I15} (1971Gr31) and 0.0213 {I9} (1966Ko16) in Coulomb Excitation 
MOMM1$+0.80 {I3} (1973Ao01) using integral perturbed angular correlation technique 
CONF$|n(2f{-5/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,p),L(p,d),L({+3}He,|a),L(d,t)=1; 897.77|g M1+E2 to 1/2- 
T$Weighted average of 0.104 ps {I21} (1973Do20), 0.132 ps {I28}, (1972Ha59), and 0.118 ps {I35} (1971Gr31), all from DSAM in Coulomb excitation 
BE2$0.0121 {I5} (1972Ha59) and 0.0124 {I10} (1971Gr31) in Coulomb Excitation 
CONF$|n(3p{-3/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L(d,t),(p,d),({+3}He,|a)=6; 1063.656|g M4+E5 to 5/2- 
T$Weighted average of 0.81 s {I4}, 0.775 s {I38} (1986Al11), 0.810 s {I8} (1973Sa22), 0.80 s {I1} (1971Sc38), 0.77 s {I3} (1971Gl09), 0.81 s {I2} (1961Gl16), 0.84 s {I2} (1956Ca50), 0.799 s {I13} (1955Be24), 0.80 s {I2} (1952Ho41), 0.82 s {I2} (1951La18). Others: 0.743 s {I22} (1967Yu01), 0.797 s (1958Fa08), 0.948 s {I14} (1956Ve10), 0.8 s {I1} (1954Re33), 0.88 s {I10} (1953Fr17). All data are from {+207}Pb IT decay 
CONF$96%|n(1i{-13/2}){+-1}~#0{++} and 4%|n(2f{-7/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$L(d,t),(p,d),({+3}He,|a)=3; 1770.228|g M1+E2 to 5/2-; 1442.2|g E2 to 3/2- 
CONF$83%|n(2f{-7/2}){+-1}~#0{++} and 17%|n(1i{-13/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p'),(|a,|a')=3; 1726.23|g (E1) to 3/2-; 2054.29|g (E1) to 5/2- 
T$From DSAM in 1972Ha59 (Coulomb excitation). Other: 0.17 ps {I14} in 1971Gr31 (Coulomb excitation) 
BE3$0.23 {I3} (1972Ha59) and 0.19 {I2} (1971Gr31) in Coulomb excitation 
CONF$|n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44); Also: member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#(3-){-1}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3. E3+M4 excitation in (e,e') 
T$From weighted average of 0.65 ps {I20} using DSAM (1972Ha59) in Coulomb excitation and 0.66 ps {I14} in {+207}Pb(n,n'|g). Other: >0.41 ps (1971Gr31) 
BE3$0.29 {I2} (1972Ha59) and 0.26 {I3} (1971Gr31) in Coulomb excitation 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#(3-){-1}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5; L(d,p),(d,t),(p,d)=4; 388.24|g (E1) to 7/2-; 1094.77|g E2 to 13/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-9/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$447.81|g (M1) to 9/2+; 835.73|g (E1) to 7/2-; 1542.32|g (E2) to 13/2+ 
T$Other: >416 fs in 1998Ye02 
CONF$Probable member of the |n(2f{-5/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} sextuplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$2283.82|g D(+Q) to 3/2-; 2612.6|g to 5/2-; 3181.30|g D(+Q) to 1/2- 
CONF$Probable member of the |n(2f{-5/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} sextuplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$2305.03|g D(+Q) to 3/2-, 2632.97|g D to 5/2- 
CONF$Probable member of the |n(2f{-5/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} sextuplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5; L(p,d)=(6); 1592.22|g M1 to 13/2+; 2655.32|g (E3) to 5/2- 
CONF$Probable member of the |n(2f{-5/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} sextuplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=0; L(d,t)=(0); 2405.35|g E1 to 3/2-; 3302.77|g E1 to 1/2- 
T$From g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 2003En07. Others: 11.7 fs {I18} (1974Sw05), >2.5 fs (2003En07) in {+207}Pb(|g,|g') and 8 fs {I+4-3} (2007Ka07) in {+207}Pb(n,n'|g) 
CONF$Probable member of the |n(2f{-5/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} sextuplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=4; L(p,d),(d,t),({+3}He,|a)=5; 752.92|g E1 to 7/2+; 1075.63|g M1+E2 to 7/2- 
CONF$Probable |n(1h{-9/2}){+-1} configuration from (d,t) and ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=(5). (pol p,p') IAR consistent with 9/2+, but not with 11/2+. 701.88|g d,Q to 9/2+; 1796.51|g to 13/2+ 
CONF$|n(2g{-9/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,t),(pol d,t) is questionable 
J$L(p,p')=(5); L(d,p)=1,4; 748.40|g D to 9/2+; 1136.42|g D to 7/2-; 1843.09|g Q to 13/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=6; L(p,p')=(5); E5+M6 excitation in (e,e'); 782.00|g M1 to 9/2+; 1876.44|g (M1) to 13/2+ 
CONF$|n(1i{-11/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5. E5 excitation in (e,e'); 921.66|g D to 7/2+; 1244.33|g D to 7/2-; 1950.79|g Q,d to 13/2+. Note, that L=5 in {+208}Pb(p,d),(pol p,d) would favour 9/2- assignment 
CONF$Member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#5{-2}{+-}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5. (pol p,p') IAR consistent with 11/2+, not 9/2+; 1987.13|g M1+E2 to 13/2+ 
CONF$|n(1i{-11/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44); Also: member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#(5-){-2}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3. L(d,p)=2; 2736.46|g D to 3/2-; 973.0|g to 7/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2,3 consistent with J|p=3/2+,5/2,7/2-; IAR consistent with 5/2+, not with 9/2+, but fits to other J|p not attempted. 998.20|g Q to 9/2+1386.16|g D to 7/2-. Note that J|p=(9/2+,11/2+) from (E5) in (e,e') 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2,15/2,17/2
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Questionable population in (d,d'), (d,t),(pol d,t) and (n,n'|g) 
J$L(p,p')=7,8; 2225.0|g to 13/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(d,p)=2,3. (pol p,p') IAR consistent with 5/2+, but not with 9/2+; 1375.89|g Q,D to 5/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2; E2 excitation in (e,e'); 4103.8|g M1+E2 to 1/2- 
CONF$Member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#2{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_comment:
J$L=(7), S in (d,p). Consistent with 15/2- in (pol p,p') IAR. Note that J|p=19/2- at 4118 keV has been assigned by 2000Re12 in {+208}Pb({+136}Xe,X|g),({+208}Pb,X|g) with configuration=94%|n(1i{-13/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} and 6%|n(1f{-7/2}){+-1}~#(3{+-}){+2} 
CONF$|n(1j{-15/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2. E2 excitation in (e,e') 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.142 {I12} (2003En07). Other: 0.99 fs {I11} (1974Sw05). Note that 2003En07 gives T{-1/2}=0.35 fs {I6} in Table 7. 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#2{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03, 1974Sw05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-,9/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=4. E4 excitation in (e,e') 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-}~#4{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet. No experimental evidences for a doublet structure has been found in 1975Wa03. However, the strength of the transition is observed to be similar to the core excitation from where authors deduce a possible doublet structure. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2. Consistent with 5/2+ in (pol p,p') IAR; 3420.5|g to 3/2-, 1591.6|g to 9/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=6. E6 excitation in (e,e'). |s(e,e') favors 11/2-. 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#6{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,t),(pol d,t) is questionable 
J$L(d,p)=2. {I3490}.7|g to 3/2-; 1660.9|g to 9/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=6. E6 excitation in (e,e'). |s(e,e') favors 13/2-. 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#6{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(p,p')=(2). L(p,d)=3 
CONF$Probable |n(1i{-13/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} configuration from (p,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2(3). Consistent with 5/2+ in (pol p,p') IAR. 3683.5|g to 3/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(d,p)=0; 3729.7|g to 3/2-, 4627.4|g to 1/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(4s{-1/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=(8). E8 excitation in (e,e'), systematics of weak-coupling doublets favors J=15/2 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#8{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)-
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(p,p')=(8). E8 excitation in (e,e') 
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#8{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2)-
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$E10 excitation in (e,e'). Systematics favors 19/2- 
CONF$Possible configuration=(({+208}Pb 10+)(|n 3p{-1/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+,13/2+)
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(p,d)=(6). L({+3}He,|a)=(3) (1978Ga23) and L({+3}He,|a)=6 (1980Gu03). 
CONF$Suggested as a possible i13/2 state by 1978Ga23 and 1980Gu03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2,3,4 (1970Mo21). In (pol p,p') IAR, 7/2+ gives a better fit than 3/2+ or 5/2+. 
CONF$|n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$J=1/2,3/2 from |g(|q,|f) in 2009Pi14 and strength in (|g,|g'). (pol p,p') IAR consistent with 1/2+. L(d,p)=2 (1970JoZS), 0 (1970Mo21) suggests doublet in (d,p); 4980.4|g E1 to 1/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(4s{-1/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$7/2+ gives best fit in (pol p,p') IAR, but 3/2+ cannot be ruled out. L(d,p)=2,3,4 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$3/2+ gives best fit in (pol p,p') IAR, but 7/2+ cannot be ruled out 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-3/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2+)
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,t) is questionable 
J$L(p,p')=3, but L(p,d)=(5) would lead to J|p=9/2-,11/2- assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
E$Population in ({+3}He,|a) is questionable 
J$L(d,p)=2 (1970JoZS), 4 (1970Mo21). 3/2+ favored in (pol p,p') IAR. 4559.7|g to 5/2-, 5129.4|g to 1/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-3/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=4. L({+3}He,|a)=5+3,6 suggests that the ({+3}He,|a) reaction is populating a level different from the 5129. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(p,p')=3. Consistent with 7/2+, but not with 5/2+ in (pol p,p') IAR. L(d,p)=0+4 (1970JoZS), 2 (1970Mo21) suggests possible doublet in (d,p). 2451.7|g to 9/2+, 1542.1|g to 5/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L(d,p)=2. Strongly enhanced on d3/2 IAR in (p,p'|g) IAR. Consistent with 3/2+ in (pol p,p') IAR; 4647.6|g to 5/2-, 5217.6|g to 1/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-3/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3. E3 excitation in (e,e'). (pol p,p') IAR consistent with 7/2+, but no fit attempted for 5/2+ 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=2 
CONF$Probable |n(2f{-7/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} or |n(1h{-9/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} configuration from (p,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$From |s and analyzing power fits in (p,p') (1983Ba44); 2581.9|g to 9/2+, 4740.3|g to 5/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)-
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,d') is questionable 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=5; L(p,d), (pol p,d)=(5) 
CONF$Dominant |n(1h{-9/2}){+-1} configuration in ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3. {I7}/2+ consistent with (pol p,p') IAR. L(d,p)=2,4; 4859.7|g to 5/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$level excited in (|g,|g'). (pol p,p') IAR gives tentative 3/2+. 4920.0|g E1 to 5/2-, 5489.7|g E1 to 1/2- 
CONF$4.7% (|n3d{-3/2}), 35.4% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-1}{+-}]{-3/2+} and 38.8% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-2}{+-}]{-3/2+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3.(pol p,p') IAR consistent with 3/2+ not with 7/2+, but 5/2+ fit not attempted. 5003.2|g to 5/2-, 5574.2|g to 1/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$5591.4 (E1) to 1/2-; excitation in {+207}Pb(|g,|g'),(pol |g,|g') 
CONF$3.4% (|n4s{-1/2}), 40.9% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-1}{+-}]{-1/2+} and 34.3% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-2}{+-}]{-1/2+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,t),(pol d,t) is questionable 
J$5611|g E1 to 1/2-; excitation in {+207}Pb(|g,|g'),(pol |g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
E$Population in (d,t),(pol d,t) is questionable 
J$L(p,p')=(3). (pol p,p') IAR consistent with 7/2+, but fit to 5/2+ not attempted 
CONF$Dominant |n(2g{-7/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=(2,4). Excited in (|g,|g'). 3/2+ consistent with (pol p,p') IAR. 5690.0|g to 1/2- 
CONF$Dominant |n(3d{-3/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2+)
level_comment:
J$Enhanced on s1/2 resonance in (p,p'|g) IAR (1981Di08) 
CONF$Probable configuration=((|n 4s{-1/2})(|n 3p{-3/2}){+-1}(|n 3p{-1/2}){+-1}) (1981Di08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2
level_comment:
E$6179|g could be interpreted as an inelastic transition from a possible 6749 keV level to the first excited state at 570 keV (1980Ch22). However, this is ruled out in 2003En07. 
J$Excited in (|g,|g'). 6181.0|g to 1/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+,25/2+)
level_comment:
J$(M12) excitation in (e,e') 
CONF$Member of the |n((1j{-15/2}){++1}(1i{-13/2}){+-1})~#12{+-}({+208}P \b) multiplet in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+,25/2+
level_comment:
J$M12 excitation in (e,e') 
CONF$Member of the |n((1j{-15/2}){++1}(1i{-13/2}){+-1})~#12{+-}({+208}P \b) multiplet in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 27/2+,29/2+
level_comment:
J$M14 excitation in (e,e') 
CONF$Member of the |n((1j{-15/2}){++1}(1i{-13/2}){+-1})~#14{+-}({+208}P \b) multiplet in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2)
level_comment:
E$6179|g is interpreted as an inelastic transition to 570 keV level (1980Ch22). However, this is ruled out in 2003En07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E,J$Isobaric analog of the 351 keV level in {+207}Tl 
$|G=350 keV {I40} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(2d{-3/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
E,J$Isobaric analog of the 1348 keV level in {+207}Tl 
$|G=225 keV {I40} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(1h{-11/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E,J$Isobaric analog of the 1682 keV level in {+207}Tl 
$|G=350 keV {I40} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(2d{-5/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 0.81 s {I4}, 0.775 s {I38} (1986Al11), 0.810 s {I8} (1973Sa22), 0.80 s {I1} (1971Sc38), 0.77 s {I3} (1971Gl09), 0.81 s {I2} (1961Gl16), 0.84 s {I2} (1956Ca50), 0.799 s {I13} (1955Be24), 0.80 s {I2} (1952Ho41), 0.82 s {I2} (1951La18). Others: 0.743 s {I22} (1967Yu01), 0.797 s (1958Fa08), 0.948 s {I14} (1956Ve10), 0.8 s {I1} (1954Re33), 0.88 s {I10} (1953Fr17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 130.2 ps {I15} (1971Ba32), 130.5 ps {I15} and 130.7 ps {I13} (1977Ku09). Others: 129 ps {I3} (1966Ko16), 129 ps {I3} (1974Aw01), 128 ps {I5} (1966Go35), 134 ps {I9} (1964Ro19), 110 ps {I11} (1963Le15), 129 ps {I3} (1978De14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=0.0032 {I3} 
E,J$From the adopted levels 
T$From adopted levels. Other: T{-1/2}=269 fs {I30} from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G=0.0032 {I3} (1998No09) and |d=+0.092 (from adopted gammas) 
S$From |G{-0}=0.00163 eV 18 in 1998No09, and branching ratios from adopted gammas 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=0.0460 {I25} 
S$From |G{-0}=0.0460 eV 25 in 1998No09. Others: 0.039 {I6} (1974Sw05) and <0.18 (2003En07) 
T$Others: 11.7 fs {I18} (1974Sw05) and >2.5 fs (2003En07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=0.59 {I4} 
S$From |G{-0}=0.297 eV 19 in 1998No09. Others: 0.68 {I8} (1974Sw05) and 0.43 {I33} (2003En07) 
T$From g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 1998No09 and |d=+0.72. Other: 0.88 fs {I10} and 1.4 fs {I11}, from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 1974Sw05 and 2003En07, respectively, and |d=+0.72 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=1.39 {I12} 
S$Other: 1.10 {I12} (1974Sw05) 
T$From g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 2003En07 and |d=+1.2 {I2}. Other: 0.34 fs {I4} from g|G{-0}{+2}/|G in 1974Sw05 and |d=+1.2 {I2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=1.31 {I21} 
S$Other: 1.38 {I15} (1974Sw05) 
T$From B(E2)|^=0.142 {I12} (2003En07). Other: 0.99 fs {I11} (1974Sw05). Note that 2003En07 gives T{-1/2}=0.35 fs {I6} in Table 7. 
CONF$(|np{-1/2}){+1}~#2{++}({+208}Pb) (1974Sw05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=6.3 {I6} 
S$Weighted average of 6.0 {I7} (2003En07) and 7.1 {I11} (1980Ch22). Other: 3.6 {I5} (1974Sw05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=4.6 {I6} 
S$Weighted average of 5.4 {I8} (2003En07), 6.1 {I12} (1980Ch22) and 4.0 {I5} (1974Sw05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=11.5 {I11} 
J$Based on |g(|q,|f) in 2009Pi14 
S$Weighted average of 11.6 {I14} (2003En07) and 11.4 {I19} (1980Ch22) 
CONF$4.7% (|n3d{-3/2}), 35.4% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-1}{+-}]{-3/2+} and 38.8% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-2}{+-}]{-3/2+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=12.1 {I14} 
J$Based on |g(|q,|f) in 2009Pi14 
S$Other: 9.0 {I14} (1980Ch22) 
CONF$3.4% (|n4s{-1/2}), 40.9% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-1}{+-}]{-1/2+} and 34.3% [(|n3p{-1/2})~#1{-2}{+-}]{-1/2+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=5.5 {I9} 
J$Based on |g(|q,|f) in 2009Pi14 
E$5611|g could be interpreted as an inelastic transition from a possible 6179 keV level to the first excited state at 570 keV (1980Ch22) However, the observation of 5611|g in 2009Pi14, where the excitation energy was 5.6 {I1} MeV, proves the excistence of this state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=5.9 {I12} 
E$6179|g could be interpreted as an inelastic transition from a possible 6749 keV level to the first excited state at 570 keV (1980Ch22). However, this is ruled out in 2003En07. 
S$Other: 3.3 {I7} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2)
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G, eV=7.2 {I14} 
S$If both the 6179 and 6749|g's (and only these transitions) deexcite the 6749 level, then |G{-|g0}/|G=0.29 {I3} (1980Ch22). Otherwise |G{-|g0}/|G=0.53 {I3} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
$Mult.=M2+E3 
BE3$0.67 {I4} to the 2.6-MeV doublet (1968Zi02) 
CONF$Member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#3-({+208}Pb) doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+,7/2+
level_comment:
$Mult.=E3+M4 
BE3$0.67 {I4} to the 2.6-MeV doublet (1968Zi02) 
CONF$Member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#3-({+208}Pb) doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-
level_comment:
$Mult.=E2 
BE2$0.26 {I2} to the 4.1-MeV doublet (1968Zi02) 
CONF$Member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#2+({+208}Pb) doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (23/2+,25/2+)
level_comment:
$Mult.=(M12) 
CONF$Member of the |n((1j{-15/2}){++1}(1i{-13/2}){+-1})~#12{+-}({+208}P \b) multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$|G{+|l}{-lj}/|G{+0,lj}{-sp}=0.004 
CONF$|n(3d{-5/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44); Also: member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#3{-1}{+-}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
$|G{+|l}{-lj}/|G{+0,lj}{-sp}=0.420 
CONF$|n(1i{-11/2}){+-1} (1983Ba44); Also: member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#5{-2}{+-}({+208}Pb) doublet (1975Wa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-,9/2-
level_comment:
CONF$member of the |n(3p{-1/2}){+-}~#4{-1}{++}({+208}Pb) doublet; No experimental evidence for a doublet structure has been found in 1975Wa03. However, the strength of the transition is observed to be similar to the core excitation from which authors deduce a possible doublet structure. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$Strongly enhanced on d5/2 analog resonance 
$|g branching: decays mainly to the 898 keV level, but level seen in p-|g coincidence with a |g to the ground state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
J$Strongly enhanced on s1/2 analog resonance 
$|g branching: I|g(g.s.):I|g(570):I|g(898)=86% {I9}: |<3% {I6}:11% {I4}. From the adopted J|p values, the transition to the 570 keV level is expected to be M2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From B(E2) 
BE2$0.213 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0214 {I10} (1972Ha59), 0.0210 {I15} (1971Gr31) and 0.0213 {I9} (1966Ko16) 
CONF$|n(2f{-5/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 0.104 ps {I21} (1973Do20), 0.132 ps {I28} (1972Ha59), and 0.118 ps {I35} (1971Gr31), all DSAM. 
BE2$0.0121 {I5} (1972Ha59) and 0.0124 {I10} (1971Gr31) 
CONF$|n(3p{-3/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Other: 0.17 ps {I14} (1971Gr31) 
BE3$0.23 {I3} (1972Ha59) and 0.19 {I2} (1971Gr31) 
CONF$|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Other: >0.41 ps (1971Gr31) 
BE3$0.29 {I2} (1972Ha59) and 0.26 {I3} (1971Gr31) 
CONF$|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1}~#3{+-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 19280 {I60} (1978Du13) and 19310 {I40} (1978Ga09) 
$|G=350 keV {I60} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(3s{-1/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 19640 {I30} (1978Du13) and 19690 {I40} (1978Ga09) 
$|G=350 keV {I40} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(2d{-3/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 20640 {I30} (1978Du13) and 20650 {I60} (1978Ga09) 
$|G=225 keV {I40} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(1h{-11/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 21000 {I30} (1978Du13) and 2100 {I60} (1978Ga09) 
$|G=350 keV {I40} (1978Du13) 
CONF$|n(2d{-5/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$1978Be24 suggests that additional 1434 keV transition deexcites this level. However, E|g is inconsistent with such a placement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$From 1971Ko04. 1971Ya05 report 2740 keV, however, the authors' spectrum is consistent with 2640 keV, so the label may be a misprint 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$From 1971Ko04. 1971Ya05 report 3470 keV, but label the peak as the h9/2 hole state, whose adopted energy is 3414 keV 
CONF$|n(1h{-9/2}){+-1} (1971Ya05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$1064|g from this level to 570 level is missed in the prompt |g-ray spectrum due to long half-life of the 1633 isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$T{-1/2}(|a) from search for 392.3 keV |a decay events; at the 90% C.L. level (2013Be16) 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+207}Pb in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$from nuclear magnetic resonance measurements on lead nitrate Pb(NO{-3}){-2} in 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+207}Pb in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from L=3 in (|a,|a'), (d,d'), (p,p'), (e,e') 
T$from B(E3)=0.611 {I9}, a weighted average of 0.611 {I12} (1983Sp02) in Coulomb excitation, and 0.612 {I13} (1980Go12) in (e,e'). The value of 32 ps {I11} reported by 1962We14 in |b{+-} decay appears to Be in error. Other: 15.4 ps {I12} from B(E2) in (|a,|a') 
$Isomer shift=6.25 {I28} from muonic atom (1977Sh07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L=5 in (|a,|a'), (d,d'), (p,p'), (e,e') 
T$from |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L=5 in (|a,|a'), (d,d'), (p,p') 
T$<100 ps from |b{+-} decay and >0.69 ps from (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$M1 |g to 5-. Not seen in (|a,|a'), (d,d'), (p,t) or (t,p) thus J|p=4- or 6-. |g from 7- 5542 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=0+2 gives J|p=4- or 5-. Not seen in (|a,|a') or (d,d'), thus J|p=5- is ruled out. A confirming argument is the strength in (d,{+3}He) which rules out J=5, given J=5 for the 3708 and 3961 levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$J=5 from |g|g(|q) and ce data in |b{+-} decay. |p=- from L=0+2 in (d,{+3}He) 
T$|<18 ps from |b{+-} decay and >0.47 ps from (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=0. Not seen in (|a,|a') or (d,d') thus J|p is not 5-. A confirming argument is the dipole component of the 1380|g to 3- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$dipole |g to 3-, |g to 4-, and |g from 2- allow 2-,3-,4-. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 2- and 4-. Note that L=0 is given in (d,{+3}He), which gives 4- or 5-. The level is weakly excited and no |s(|q) is shown. Also, L=(6) is reported in (d,p), suggesting J|p=5- or 6-. The evaluator notes that |s(|q) in (d,p) is too forward peaked to Be fit with L=2 and/or 4, required for J|p=3-. If the reaction L values are correct, there must Be a doublet at this energy, possibly with J|p=5- for the second member. There is no evidence of a doublet in the high-precision |g data. Note finally that L=(3) in (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$L=2 in (|a,|a') 
T$weighted average of 0.78 fs {I4} from B(E2)=0.318 {I16} in (e,e') and 0.87 fs {I7} from |G in (|g,|g'). Both values were deduced using |G{-|g0}/|G=0.9954 {I15} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=4+6. The assignment is confirmed in {+208}Pb(p,p') IAR. See reference 24 of 2006He21 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$seen only in (d,{+3}He) and weakly excited so level is questionable 
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p3s{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=6. Not observed in (|a,|a'). Dipole component in |g to 5- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for 3d{-3/2} gives 2- or 3-. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 2-. Note that L=0 in (d,{+3}He) gives 4- or 5-; however, the state is weakly excited and no |s(|q) is shown 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=4 for configuration=|n2g{-9/2} allows J|p=4- or 5-. The 1647|g to 3- has a dipole component 
$For the neutron configuration see reference 24 of 2006He21 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L(p,p')=5. A confirming argument is L(d,{+3}He)=0+2, allowing 4- or 5-. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 4- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$L=4 in (|a,|a') and (d,d') 
T$from B(E4)=0.155 {I11} in (e,e') and |G{-|g0}/|G=0.00260 {I+27-35} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=0+2 allows 4- or 5-. The 1744|g to 3- has a dipole component 
$For the neutron configuration see reference 24 of 2006He21 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$seen only in (d,{+3}He) and weakly excited so level is questionable 
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$L(|a,|a')=8. L=8 also in (p,p') and (e,e') 
T$from |a|g(t) in (t,|a|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$the 474|g and 760|g to 6- levels have dipole components and the magnitude of |d for both transitions argues against mult=E1+M2. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 6-. L=(9) is reported in (p,p'), but the evaluator notes that L=5 or 7 seem to give as good a fit. Absence of gammas to levels with J<6 suggests 7- rather than 5-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(|a,|a')=3. J|p=3- from |s and form factor in (e,e'). L(p,p')=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=2. The 1511|g and 1000|g to J|p=5- levels have dipole components. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 4- or 6- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$dipole components in |g's to 3- and 4- levels. Not seen in (|a,|a') so J|p probably not 3- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(p,p')=(7). Not seen in (|a,|a') so J|p probably 6- or 8-. |g's to 5- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=1. Confirming arguments are J|p=1- from |s and form factor in (e,e') and J|p=1- from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$from (|g,|g'). Other: <9 fs from (n,n'|g) 
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=7 for j{-15/2} gives 7+ or 8+. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 7+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=7 for j{-15/2} allows 7+ or 8+. The 387|g to 6- has a dipole dipole component 


