# LEVEL

level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$2 from 1968Co20. 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=98 |mb/sr for L=(0) component and 68 for L=2 component (1987Li02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$from 1974Se10. Other: 4748 {I5} (1968Co20). Both 1974Se10 and 1968Co20 note the presence of an overlapping contaminant transition from {+89}Sr. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$0 from 1974Se10 and 1968Co20. 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=4280 |mb/sr for L=0 component and 291 for L=2 component (1987Li02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$0 from 1974Se10 and 1968Co20. 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=2570 |mb/sr for L=0 component and 64 for L=(2) component (1987Li02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$2 from 1968Co20 for 6008 {I8}. 
$d|s/d|W{-max}=274 |mb/sr for L=0 component and 31 for L=(2) component (1987Li02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |G=0.00294 eV {I15} (1977Me10). Other: 0.11 ps {I3} (1959Of14). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.060 eV {I6} (2007Sc36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.150 eV {I24} (1971Me07), 0.168 eV {I39} (2000Ka08) and 0.171 eV {I19} (2004Ka62) 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.202 eV {I16} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.51 eV {I6} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 162 {I18} (2004Ka62). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from |G=0.034 eV {I6} (2004Ka62). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.073 eV {I11} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.112 eV {I20} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 26 {I5} (2004Ka62). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.15 eV {I3} (1975Me06), 0.17 eV {I4} (2000Ka08), 0.173 eV {I24} (2004Ka62), and 0.197 eV {I22} (2007Sc36). All values are corrected for branching as measured in 2004Ka62. 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.123 eV {I14} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.32 eV {I4} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 55 {I7} (2004Ka62). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.29 eV {I7} (2004Ka62) and 0.33 eV {I3} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.35 eV {I3} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.88 eV {I20} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 94 {I22} (2004Ka62) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.13 eV {I3} (2004Ka62) and 0.138 eV {I24} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.15 eV {I3} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.37 eV {I10} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 37 {I9} (2004Ka62) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 1.90 eV {I23} (1980Is03), 1.9 eV {I5} (2004Ka62) and 2.08 eV {I15} (2007Sc36). All values are corrected for branching as measured in 2004Ka62. 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=1.98 eV {I14} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=5.5 eV {I14} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 547 {I136} (2004Ka62) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 2.8 eV {I3} (1980Is03) and 2.89 eV {I22} (2007Sc36). Other: 2.54 eV {65} (2004Ka62). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=3.08 eV {I23} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=7.6 eV {I20} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 730 {I187} (2004Ka62) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.27 eV {I7} (2004Ka62) and 0.33 eV {I4} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.35 eV {I4} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.81 eV {I21} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 77 {I20} (2004Ka62) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$from 2007Sc36. Other: 0.032 eV {I9} (2004Ka62). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.087 eV {I23} (2007Sc36), g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.097 eV {I28} (2004Ka62) 
S$other: 8.6 {I25} (2004Ka62). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 4.1 eV {I5} (1980Is03) and 4.2 eV {I3} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=4.2 eV {I3} (2007Sc36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 1.31 eV {I27} (1980Is03) and 1.36 eV {I13} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=1.44 eV {I14} (2007Sc36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 2.5 eV {I5} (1980Is03) and 1.93 eV {I19} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=2.06 eV {I20} (2007Sc36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.8 eV {I8} (1980Is03) and 3.1 eV {I3} (2007Sc36). 
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G=3.3 eV {I3} (2007Sc36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
BE2$weighted average of 0.0822 {I24} (1974Fi05) and 0.099 {I5} (1968Pe02). Other: 0.140 {I10} (1956He83). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$B(E3) from 1982VaZI (Bates measurement). Other: 0.068 {i4} (1982VaZI, Darmstadt measurement), 0.062 {i4} (1974Fi05), 0.081 {i3} (1968Pe02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
$Possibly doublet since form factor shows no clear 4+ distribution and energies determined from forward and backward scattering seem to be discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$|b{-L}=0.11 
S$Others: 0.085 from ({+16}O,{+16}O') (1973Be13). 0.08 from ({+22}Ne,{+22}Ne') (1974Gr16). 
T$weighted average of 0.152 ps {I12} (2012Ku14) and 0.152 ps {I16} (1988Ku01), both from DSAM. Other: 0.119 ps {I16} from B(E2) (1973Ch13). 
G$from transient field technique (2012Ku14). Other: +1.15 {I17} from transient field technique (1988Ku01) 
BE2$from 1973Ch13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4,5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Other: 0.24 ps {I+30-10} 
J$684|g to 5-, 1534|g to 3-; J=3 gives best fit in |g(|q) data (1993BaYX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$based on D 349|g to (6)- and levels with J>6 not expected to be populated in (n,n'|g), 1993BaYX proposed J|p=(6-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$measured F(|t) of depopulating 1780|g is different from 2678|g depopulating the 4514.12 level, establishing these as two distinct levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$Other: 14 fs {I8} (2008Go25). 
E$measured F(|t) of depopulating 2678|g is different from 1780|g depopulating the 4513.97 level, establishing these as two distinct levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$(Q) 5170|g to 0+. 
E$measured F(|t) of 5169.9|g is sufficiently different from |g's depopulating the 5169.01 level to suggest the 5170.1 level is distinct. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
$RMS charge radius: (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=4.2418 fm {I23} (2004An14 evaluation; and 2008 update available at http://cdfe.sinp.msu.ru) 
J$hyperfine structure (1987Bu11). L=2 and Ay(|q) in (pol d,p) 
J$ 1/2+ in 1997Mo25 calculation 
T$weighted average (LWM method) of 50.65 d {I5} (2005Am01), 50.61 d {I5} (2002Al02), 50.75 d {I25} (1972La14), 50.55 d {I9} (1971Ba28), 50.52 d {I3} (1965An07), 50.36 d {I18} (1959Os37), and 50.5 d {I2} (1955He81); normalized |h{+2}=1.3. Methods generally used timing of |b using 4|p proportional counter. Others: 1965Fl02, 53 d (Novey et al, NNES 9, 678 (1950)), 55 d (1949Go20), 54.5 d (1946Gr06), 55 d 5 (1939St01,1937St01), 54 d (1939Li10) 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure measurement (1987An02). Q is recalculated value by 2002Ma09. 1989Ra17 quoted Q from from 1987An02. Others: |m=-1.147 {I2} (1990Bu12,1990Li28), Q=-0.315 {I23} (1987An02), -0.278 {I25} (1990Bu12,1990Li28). 
|D<r{+2}>({+88}Sr-{+89}Sr)=-0.124 fm{+2} {I5} (1990Bu12,1996Li25,1992Ne09,1992Li24). Others: -0.147 fm{+2} {I8} (1985Bu20), -0.10 {I4} or -0.21 {I10} (1987An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g to 11/2-; |g from (19/2)-; possible |DJ=0 transition to 15/2-. 13/2- was proposed in (|a,n|g) (1981Wa10) based on |g(|q) and polarization. The |g(|q) data in 1981Wa10 are consistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole for 1593|g to 11/2-. The polarization measurement in 1981Wa10 had a large uncertainty, thus M1+E2 assignment for 1593|g based on these data could be suspect 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L=2 and Ay(|q) in (pol d,p) for a 3687 {I6} level which is associated with 3699.8 level populated in (n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1 |g to (19/2)-. Positive parity proposed by 2012Hw05 based on coupling of 15/2- to 3- octupole state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
d|s/d|W (at 180|')=0.14 mb/sr, 0.40 mb/sr, 0.98 mb/sr at E=26.7 MeV, 28.6 MeV, 30.5 MeV, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
d|s/d|W (at 180|')=0.17 mb/sr, 0.40 mb/sr, 0.80 mb/sr at E=26.7 MeV, 28.6 MeV, 30.5 MeV, respectively 
T$from DSA (1973HaUN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$pseudolevel indicated by TAGS data (1997Gr09). Uncertainty assigned by the evaluator based on 100 keV bin chosen by 1997Gr09 in the spectral analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
S$4.76 (1968Co03), 3.9 from C{+2}S=0.65 (1977Bl08), 5.16 (1984Sa05) 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.15 fm {I+12-9} (1984Sa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
S$others: 1.81 (1968Co03), 1.76 from C{+2}S=0.88 (1977Bl08), 1.78 (1984Sa05) 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.43 fm {I+12-8} (1984Sa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Spectroscopic amplitude=-0.2 from coupled-channel analysis of non-stripped state described as 2+ coupled to d{-5/2} neutron (1977Bl08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
S$others: 0.548 (1968Co03), 0.60 from C{+2}S=0.10 (1977Bl08), 0.54 (1984Sa05) 
E$1931 (1968Co03) 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.38 fm {I+14-9} (1984Sa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$2000 (1968Co03) 
S$other: 1.85 (1968Co03), 2.12 from C{+2}S=0.53 (1977Bl08), 2.16 (1984Sa05) 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.23 fm {I+13-8} (1984Sa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ 2057 (1968Co03) 
Spectroscopic amplitude |<0.05 is from coupled-channel analysis of non-stripped state described as 2+ coupled to d{-5/2} neutron (1977Bl08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_comment:
E$2266 (1968Co03) 
Spectroscopic amplitude=-0.02 from coupled-channel analysis of non-stripped state described as 3- coupled to d{-5/2} neutron (1977Bl08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$2443 {I3} (1978Cl04), 2455 (1968Co03) 
S$others: 1.36 (1968Co03), 1.40 from C{+2}S=0.35 (1977Bl08), 1.52 (1984Sa05) 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.29 fm {I+13-8} (1984Sa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
E$2558 (1968Co03) 
Spectroscopic amplitude=+0.05 is from coupled-channel analysis of non-stripped state described as 3- coupled to d{-5/2} neutron (1977Bl08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
S$others: 5.89 (1968Co03), 5.03 (1973Sl01), 7.20 from C{+2}S=0.90 (1977Bl08) 
E$2671 (1968Co03), 2689 (1977Bl08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
E$2710 (1977Bl08), 2691 (1968Co03) 
Spectroscopic amplitude=+0.07 from coupled-channel analysis of non-stripped state described as 3- coupled to d{-5/2} neutron (1977Bl08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,5/2+)
level_comment:
L,S$others: 0.141 for L=(2) (1968Co03). From coupled-channel calculations, spectroscopic amplitude=-0.15 (1977Bl08) for 7/2- 
E$2805 (1968Co03,1978Cl04), 2819 (1977Bl08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Reported by 1977Bl08 only and, tentatively, described a non-stripped (9/2-) state arising from 3- coupled to d{-5/2} neutron 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3082 (1977Bl08), 3070 (1973Sl01) 
L,S$from C{+2}S=0.01 for L=2 (1977Bl08). Other: 0.036, 0.015 for L=(2,1) in 1973Sl01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
S$0.317 (1968Co03), 0.308 (1973Sl01), 0.24 from C{+2}S=0.06 (1977Bl08) 
E$3137 (1977Bl08), 3128 (1978Cl04,1968Co03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from 10558 y {I11} obtained from weighted average of 10527 d {I51} (1965An07, decay measured over 11.2 y), 10557 d {I11} (2004Sc04, decay measured over 17 y), and 10561 d {I14} (1994Ma50, decay measured over 33 y). Conversion from days to years calculated using tropic year (1 year =365.24 d). Others: 10702 d {I584} (1958An40, specific activity), 10227 d {I146} (1965Fl01, decay), 10410 d {I329} (1965Fl01, specific activity), 10513 d {I14} (1992ScZZ, decay measured over 4 y), 10495 d {I4} (1996Wo06, decay measured over 6 y), 7270 d {I110} (1950Po67, decay), 10117 d {I146}, (1955Wi15, specific activity), 10282 d {I13} (1978La21, decay), 10589 d {I92} (1983Ra09, decay), 10665 d {I37} (1989Ko57, decay) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+89}Sr,{+90}Sr)=0.153 fm{+2} {I4}, LASER spectroscopy (1992Ne09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=3,(4); D(+Q) 1375.4|g to 2+. |g|g(|q) in {+90}Kr |b{+-} decay yields J=2 or 3, with J=2 providing the better fit. Combined with data from (t,p) experiment, J=3 is tentatively adopted here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$I|b=0.57% (1997Gr09). From I(|g+ce) balance at this level, the |b feeding is 0.003 % {I40}, consistent with zero feeding 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
G$weighted average of g=-0.16 {I30}, -0.02 {I20}, and -0.16 {I15} measured at E({+86}Kr)=3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 MeV/nucleon, respectively (2014Ku10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
G$weighted average of g=-0.03 {I25}, +0.06 {I38}, and -0.06 {I28} measured at E({+86}Kr)=3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 MeV/nucleon, respectively (2014Ku10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+91}Sr-{+88}Sr)=0.374, uncertainty 0.003 (statistical), 0.016 (systematic) (1990Bu12). 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.275 fm {I4} (2004An14). 
J 5/2 from laser spectroscopy (1987Bu11). |b{+-} decay to 1/2- {+91}Y g.s. (log| {If{+1u}t}=9.34) has first-forbidden unique shape (1953Am08). Probable configuration=(|n d{-5/2}) (1990Bu12). 
T unweighted average of 9.67 h {I2} (1953Am08), 9.7 h {I1} (1954He78), 9.48 h {I1} (1969Kn01), 9.75 h {I7} (1972Eh02). Others: 9.53 h (1972Ch13); 9.7 h {I11} and 9.2 h {I13} (2001Na43; from 1024|g(t) without and with Cd capsule, respectively). 
MOMM1 from collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy (2011StZZ, from 0.885 {I2} (1990Bu12); supersedes -0.8868 {I6} from 1989Ra17); uncertainty includes estimate for hfs anomaly). 
MOME2 From 2011StZZ (revision by 2002Ma09 of earlier datum,+0.44 {I4}, using recalculated hfs constants). Other Q: +0.047 {I12} (2011StZZ, from 1990Bu12; supersedes +0.44 {I4} with Sternheimer correction (1989Ra17)). From collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J E2(+M1) transition to 5/2+ g.s.; shell-model calculations predict a low-energy 3/2+ level (1973Wa36,1970Ma53). 
T from |b{+-} decay. 
MOMM1 From g=-0.231 {I11} (time-differential PAC, 1993Wo07); Knight shift and diamagnetic correction not included but expected to be <2%. Other g: 1994Ka40 (tentative value of 0.080 {I2} which implies |m=0.120 {I3}, inconsistent with 1993Wo07). Datum rounded to -0.35 {I2} in 2011StZZ. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J proposed in ({+36}S,F|g); (13/2+) suggested in ({+24}Mg,Fxn|g), but D 1084|g feeds (9/2+) 994. Possible one-phonon octupole vibrational state, (|n d{-5/2})~#3- (2013Hw01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_comment:
J 1226|g to (11/2-) 2078; (15/2-) proposed by 2013Hw01 by analogy with {+89}Sr(3672 level). Possible structure: |n d{-5/2} ~# 5- (2013Hw01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_comment:
J D |DJ=1 332|g to (19/2-) 3946; |p=+ suggested by 2013Hw01, by analogy with {+89}Sr. Possible structure: (15/2-)~#3- (2013Hw01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+88}Sr,{+92}Sr)=0.512; uncertainty is 0.005 (statistical only), 0.021 (systematic included) (1990Bu12). For discussion of differential changes in |D<r{+2}>, see 1996Li25. 
J see comment on 815 level. 
T unweighted average of 2.594 h {I6} (2008Le19) and 2.627 h {I9} (2003NiZY) (the weighted average is 2.604 h {I15}), the two highest precision measurements available. Other GeLi data: 2.71 h {I1} (1971Pa31). Other NaI scin data: 2.71 h {I2} (1960Fr05), 2.84 h {I22}, 2.73 h {I10}, 2.79 h {I19}, 2.77 h {I17}, 2.74 h {I18}, 2.45 h {I7}, 2.57 h {I7} (1956He77). The weighted average of all data is 2.667 h {I16}; this rises to 2.669 h {I15} if the statistical outlier datum (2.45 h {I7}) is excluded. However, these averages may not be reliable since these data are discrepant. 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.295 fm {I6} (2004An14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J analogous to 3- states in {+88}Sr and {+90}Sr at 2734 and 2207, respectively; D 1371|g to 2+ 815. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J energy systematics of lower-N Sr isotopes suggest a 5- level in this vicinity (2000Fo13); D 1092|g to (4)+ 1673. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2(+),(1)
level_comment:
J |g|g(|q) rules out J=4, favors J=2, but also permits 1,3; strong |g to 0+ g.s. If J=2, |g|g(|q) implies |d(2007|g)<-0.53, favoring |p=+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J 1341|g to (4)+ 1673 so J=(2 to 6). J|p=(4+) proposed in ({+36}S,Fxn|g) but (5,6+) in {+248}Cm SF decay. Possible dominant configuration: |p (1p{-3/2}{+-1} 1p{-1/2}){-2} |n(1d{-5/2}{+4}){-2}) (2002St06) if J=4. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J 1455|g to (4)+ 1673; (5,6+) from {+248}Cm SF decay; possible configuration: |p (1p{-3/2}{+-1} 1p{-1/2}){-2} |n(1d{-5/2}{+4}){-4}) (2002St06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J authors note that 5- or 6+ cannot be totally excluded, but favor 4+. Possible dominant configuration: |p (1p{-3/2}{+-1} 1p{-1/2}){-2} |n(1d{-5/2}{+4}){-2}) (2002St06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J authors note that 7- cannot be totally excluded. Possible dominant configuration: |p (1p{-3/2}{+-1} 1p{-1/2}){-2} |n(1d{-5/2}{+4}){-4}) (2002St06) if J=6; however, adopted |p=- and shell-model calculations predict the second 6+ state at somewhat higher energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E level not adopted. 793|g is placed in a later study feeding the 2766 level instead (see {+159}Tb({+36}S,Fxn|g) dataset), implying E(level)=3559. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
|m: from fast ion beam collinear LASER spectroscopy (1990Bu12 and 1990Li28); value relative to {+87}Sr. 
Q: 2002Ma09; revision of Q=0.264 {I25} from 1990Bu12 and 1990Li28, from collinear fast beam LASER spectroscopy. 
|D<r{+2}>: 0.590 {I25} relative to {+88}Sr, from collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy (1990Bu12). 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.306 {I7} (2004An14). 
J: from hyperfine structure measurements (1987Bu11). |p: from comparison of |m with Schmidt values for J=5/2. 
T weighted average of 7.43 min {I3} (1972He41), 7.41 min {I4} (1986Ok03), 7.54 min {I6} (1960Fr05) and 7.32 min {I10} (1969Ca03). Others: 8.22 min {I14} (1972Eh02), 6.95 min {I7} (1974Gr29). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1 From g-factor=-0.227 {I13} (2004Sa69; TDPAC) if hyperfine field for Sr in Fe is -23.83 {I7} tesla and J(213 level)=9/2; note that J=9/2 is highly tentative, however. 
J E2 213|g to 5/2+ g.s.; 1566|g from (11/2-) 1780; log| {Ift}|>7.4, log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5 from 5/2-; 2558|g from 2771 level (for which J|p=(7/2-) or higher). However, g-factor is similar to that calculated and/or observed for low-lying 3/2+ states in neighboring nuclides (2004Sa69), and authors assume J=3/2; if J|p(213)=3/2+, either the 1566|g and 2558|g are misplaced in |b{+-} decay or J|p(1780)=(11/2-) is incorrect. 
T from 2004Sa69 in |b{+-} decay. Others: 4.6 ns {I3} (1986Ka20), 4.6 ns {I5} (1983Ka41), 4.6 ns {I3} (1970MaZC) and 5 ns {I1} (1982Ka03), all from |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 2004Sa69. Others: 4.6 ns {I3} from 1986Ka20 (|b|g delayed coin), 4.6 ns {I5} (1983Ka41), 4.6 ns {I3} (1970MaZC) and 5 ns {I1} (1982Ka03). 
g-factor=-0.227 {I13} (2004Sa69) from TDPAC assuming hyperfine field for Sr in Fe at low temperature is -23.83 {I7} tesla. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$J|p=(21/2+) assigned as a member of the g.s. band in 2003Hw01 now assigned in the Erratum as a level with no J|p assignment since mult=M3 implied for the 574.2|g is considered unlikely by authors. This correction also leads to removal of J|p and band assignment for the 4795 level in the Erratum. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$J|p=(25/2+) and member of g.s. band in 2003Hw01 removed in the Erratum. See comment for the 3881 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 1986Ok03. Others: 75.1 s {i4} (1983Ok07), 76.7 s {i9} (1979En02), 78.9 s {i10} (1976KiZK), 75.3 s {i7} (1974Gr29), 74.1 s {i3} (1973Gr14), 78.9 s {i8} (1973Ta09). 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.324 fm {I8} ( 2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$assignment adopted from 2009Rz01 based on E1 |g to 4+. 1980Ju03 (94Rb |b{+-} decay makes the (4+) assignment based on log| {Ift}=7.21 from 3(-) parent. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$Q |g to 3(-) and D+Q |g to 4+ reported in 2009Rz01; Based on log| {Ift}=7.34 in |b{+-} decay from 3(-) parent J|p should be (2,3,4). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J$adopted from 2009Rz01 based on (Q) |g to 3(-); from the log| {Ift}=7.28 in the |b{+-} decay from 3(-) parent the spin should be (2,3,4). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_comment:
J$from {+94}Sr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, based on E1 assignment for the 767.3-keV transition in 2009Rz01. In addition, there is evidence in 2009Rz01 for transitions from 3923 level to (5-) and (6-) levels. J|p=8+, as assigned in Figure 1 of 2017Re04, is incorrect, per email communication with first author (June 7, 2017). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime=7.80 ps {I+50-40}(stat) {I7}(syst) (2017Ch28) from RDM. Authors compare their value with |t=10 ps {I4} from 1991Ma05 (Nucl. Phys. A523, 197) from |b|g|g(t). Compiler notes another recent measurement of |t=10 ps {I5} from |g|g(t) in {+235}U(n,F|g) (2017Re05: Phys. Rev. C95, 054319). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$J=1/2 from CFBLS (1987Bu11); |p=+ from J and |m 
T$Weighted av of 23.7 s {i3} (686|g) (1986Ok03. Ge(Li)) and 24.17 s {i20} (686|g), 24.06 s {i22} (827|g), 23.46 s {i27} (2247|g), and 23.59 s {i46} (2717|g) (1974He03. Ge(Li)). Others: 24.0 s {i10} (827|g), 23.9 s {i14} (1278|g), and 23.8 s {i13} (2247|g) (1986Ok03); 24.69 s {i43} (945|g), 27.2 s {i11} (1278|g), and 20.47 s {i73} (2933|g) (1974He03); and 25.9 s {i16} (1973Ta09. Ge(Li)). 25.1 s {i2} (1979En02. |b{+-}'s; Si) and 24.8 s {i2}, 25.5 s {i1}, and 30.0 s {i3} (1974Gr29. 4|p|b; scin,milking) are discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.0 from 5/2-; E2 |g to (3/2)+ and no observed |g to 1/2+. 
T$Weighted av of 20.9 ns {i5} (|b-352|g(t) in |b{+-} decay, 24.0 ns {i12} (fragment-204|g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay), 23.1 ns {i12} and 22.0 ns {i11} (fragment-352|g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay), 21.8 ns {i11} and 22.6 ns {i12} (fragment-352|g(t)) in (n,F|g), 26 ns 2 (fragment-204|g(t) in {+254}Cf SF decay) and 22 ns 3 (325|g(t) + 204|g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$from 2015Cz01 
T$from the 682.5|g-203.9|g time distribution (2015Cz01). Other: 21.9 ns {I5} in {+95}Sr Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (updated in 2009) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 1990Ma03. Others: 1.04 s {i1} (1988Ma01), 1.10 s {i2} (1979En02), 1.015 s {i19} (1978Wo09), 1.06 s {i4} (1975Ba36), 1.0 s {i1} (1976SiZU) 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.361 {I11} (2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) for cascade 414|g-815|g uniquely determined J=2 and J=0 for levels 814.9 and 1229.28. RUL 
T$from 1991MaZS. Others: 4.5 ps {i24} (1991Ma05), see also 1989Ma38 in |b{+-} Decay 
E$815.5 in 1991MaZS in |b{+-} Decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ Total of 10520 implantations observed, and 5385 correlated decay sequences. 
T$ values listed in table I: 940 ms {I45} (syst) {I60} (stat), from maximum likelihood method (MLH); 950 ms {I25} (syst) {I25} (stat), least-squares fit method. Value in Adopted dataset for {+96}Sr in ENSDF database is 1.07 s {I1}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+0.47 {I+5-4} (2016Cl03) 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-0.30 {I+45-41} (2016Cl03) 
MOME2$value listed here is in units of eb, whereas 2016Cl01 give this in efm{+2} units. The uncertainty is statistical 
$Measured spectroscopic quadrupole moment is indicative of weak prolate deformation 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2). Other: 4.8 ps {I28} from |b|g(t) in 1991Ma05 (Nucl. Phys. A523, 197) agrees with the value from B(E2), but is less precise 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
T$2016Cl01 use T{-1/2}=115 ps {I12} (from 1991Ma05) in their GOSIA2 analysis to constrain the influence of 1229-keV level excitation on the excitation probability of the 815-keV level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$4.8 ps {I28} in {+96}Sr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database; 3.5 ps {I+8-7} (2016Cl01: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 022701) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$relative population of 1465 level to 1229 level was determined as 1.50 {I52}. 
S$0.29 {I13} in ADWA calculations 
S$angular distribution could not be extracted for this state. C{+2}S is deduced from population relative to the 1229 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$J=1/2 collinear fast beam LASER spectroscopy (1987Bu11, 1990Li28,1990Bu12); |p=+ from shell model: 3s1/2 is the only available low-energy J=1/2 level for N=59 nucleus. 
T$weighted average of 420 {I20} ms (1987PfZX), 429 {I5} ms (1986Wa17), 420 {I40} ms (1982Ga24), 390 {I30} ms (1981En05), 441 {I15} ms (1978Wo09). Others: 403 {I5} ms (1983Re10, earlier report by 1986Wa17), 430 {I30} ms (1979En02, earlier report by 1981En05), 850 {I50} ms (1971Tr02), |?400 ms (1970Ei02). 
%B-N$recommended value (1993Ru01); 0.03 {I2} (1987PfZX), <0.05 (1986Wa17), <0.02 (1983Re10), 0.005 {I2} (1982Ga24), 0.27 {I9} (1981En05). 
MOMM1$measured by collinear fast beam LASER spectroscopy - accelerated beam. Others: -0.498 {I2} (2005St24,1990Bu12), -0.500 {I1} (1989Ra17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 3/2+; configuration=g7/2 
T$weighted average of 170 ns {I10} ({+97}Rb |b{+-} decay) and 165 ns {I25} ({+252}Cf SF decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$M1,E2 |g to 1/2+ g.s. and M1+E2 |g from 5/2+, 687; band head of positive parity band with E2, |DJ=2 {I237}.5|g and higher Q, |DJ=2 |g's 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(3/2)-,(5/2)-,(7/2)- from M1+E2 |g from (5/2)-, 714; (3/2)- from |g to 1/2+, g.s.; band head of negative parity band with M1+E2 |DJ=1 stopover 57.7|g and cascade of Q, |DJ=2 crossover |g's 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 1/2+, g.s.; band head of positive parity band with M1+E2 |DJ=1 stopover 102.0|g and cascade of Q, |DJ=2 crossover |g's 
B2$from {+248}Cm SF 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(1/2)-,(3/2)-,(5/2)- from E1 |g to (3/2)+, 585; (5/2)- from no |g to 1/2+, g.s.; band head of negative parity band with M1+E2 |DJ=1 stopover 69.1|g and signature partner of band based on (3/2)-, |a=-1/2 
T$other: 1.7 ns ({+97}Rb |b{+-} decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$3/2-,5/2-,7/2- from E1 |g to 5/2+, 687; 7/2- from |DJ=2, Q in-band |g to (3/2)-, 645 
B2$from {+248}Cm SF 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$based on analogy with 9/2[404], 1038.8 isomeric level in {+99}Zr (2003Ur01) as adopted in {+238}U(|a,F|g), {+248}Cm SF, and {+252}Cf SF datasets; previously (11/2-) was suggested by 1980MoZJ ({+252}Cf SF) on the basis of systematics with N=57 and N=59 nuclei. 
T$mean value of 263 ns {I24} ({+252}Cf SF) and 526 ns {I13} ({+239}Pu(n,F|g) E=th, 2005Zl01) with an uncertainty which covers both values. These values are strongly discrepant and remeasurement is needed. The value from {+252}Cf SF is the weighted average of 265 ns {I27} (2003Hw03) and 255 ns 56 (2006Hw01). Others (same dataset): 515 ns {I15} (1980MoZJ - 2003 correction suggests 255 ns {I10}); 382 ns {I11} (1974Su04 - it does not seem certain the measured 522.4|g pertains to {+97}Sr). The 515 ns {I15} (1980MoZJ) corrected to 255 ns {I10} (2003) might suggest that the 2003Hw03, 2006Hw01 results (same group) from {+252}Cf SF (w. aver. 263 ns 24) are correct; however some authors of 1980MoZJ (and 2003 correction) and 2005Zl01 are common, which might suggest that the result of 2005Zl01 (526 ns {I13}) from {+239}Pu(n,F|g) is correct (see also corresponding comments in {+252}Cf SF and {+239}Pu(n,F|g) E=th datasets) 
B2$weighted average of 0.441 {I15} ({+252}Cf SF) and 0.441 {I26} ({+248}Cm SF) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2)
level_comment:
J$(3/2+,5/2,7/2+) from |g's to (3/2)+, 586 and (7/2)+, 822; (7/2) excluded from log| {Ift}=6.2 from 3/2+ g.s. of {+97}Rb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
B2$deduced from Q{-0}=3.86 {I23} eb for |n9/2[404] isomer band 
J$from similarity to 9/2[404], 1038.8 isomeric level in {+99}Zr (2003Ur01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
B2$recalculated by 2004Ur06 ({+248}Cm SF) using data of 2003Hw03 
J$adopted by 2003Hw03 from similarity to 9/2[404], 1038.8 isomeric level in {+99}Zr (2003Ur01). Previously (11/2-) was suggested by 1980MoZJ on the basis of systematics with N=57 and N=59 nuclei. 
T$weighted average of 265 ns {I27} (2003Hw03) and 255 ns {I56} (2006Hw01). Others: 515 ns {I15} (1980MoZJ) (in a priv comm in 3/2003 to the editors two of the coauthors of 1980MoZJ (Pfeiffer, Pinston) suggest correcting the T{-1/2} to 255 ns {I10} to the same scale as T{-1/2}(308 level)); 382 ns {I11} (1974Su04 - this value is used in 2004Hw02 to compare with 265 ns {I27} (2003Hw03); however while 1974Su04 report T{-1/2} for a 522.4|g, it does not seem certain that this |g pertains to {+97}Sr) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 2005Zl01. 1999Ge01 report T{-1/2}(140|g)=0.43 |ms {I3} presumably associated with this level, or this and 308 level (see table 1 and fig. 9) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$in Erratum, authors note value of 526 ns {I13} measured by 2005Zl01: Phys. Rev. C 72, 067302 (2005), and that more work is needed to confirm the half-life of this isomer. 
T$Compiler's note: results from more recent measurements: 515 ns {I10} (2013Ru07: Phys. Rev. C 87, 064317); 504 ns {I8} (2018Rz01: Phys. Rev. C 98, 064315); and 526 ns {I17} (2019Es04: Phys. Rev. C 100, 064309); suggesting that values of 265 ns {I27} in 2003Hw03, and 255 ns {I30} (2006Hw01: Phys. Rev. C 73, 044316) are discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ Total of 9763 implantations observed, and 5082 correlated decay sequences. 
T$ values listed in table I: 450 ms {I25} (syst) {I30} (stat), from maximum likelihood method (MLH); 456 ms {I5} (syst) {I13} (stat), least-squares fit method. Value in Adopted dataset for {+97}Sr in ENSDF database is 429 ms {I5}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
$ 2012Ka36 seem to associate this isomer with known 170-ns isomer at 309 keV, but half-life is closer to that of known isomer at 832, (9/2+) with reported values of 526 ns {I13} and 265 ns {I27} 
$ Number of implanted fragments=3.2|*10{+3} 
T$ from |g(t) method (2012Ka36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from the 522.1|g-141.0|g time distribution (2015Cz01). Other: 169 ns {I9} in {+97}Sr Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (updated in 2009) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from 141|g-167|g(t) (2019Es04). Result is a weighted average of 313 ps {I6} (from slope method), 310 ps {I5} (from convolution method) and 310.5 ps {I28} (centroid-shift method). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 9.7 ps {I55} from 308|g-355.4|g(t) and 10.4 ps {I69} from 308|g-522.8|g(t) (2019Es04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
S$for J=3/2, 0.13 {I5} for J=5/2 
S$0.17 {I7} for J=3/2 in ADWA calculations, and 0.11 {I4} for J=5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius=4.438 fm {I22} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+88}Sr,{+98}Sr)=1.656 fm{+2} {I6} (2013An02) 
T$weighted average of 0.652 s {I3} (2017Ur03, weighted average of 0.650 s {I5} from decay curves for 428.6- and 444.7-keV |g rays, and 0.652 s {I3} from decay curve for 119.3-keV |g ray; note that 2017Ur03 list 0.651 s {I2} in their summary Table II), and 0.653 s {I2} (1986ReZU). Others, with much less precision: 0.640 s {I20}(syst) {I35}(stat) from maximum likelihood method (MLH), 0.577 s {I1}(syst) {I30}(stat) from least-squares fit method (2012Qu01), 0.650 s {I40} (1987PfZX), 0.645 s {i50} (1982Ga24), 0.7 s {i1} (1981En05), 0.6 s {i1} (1979En02), 0.66 s {i7} (1978Wo09), 1.04 s {I11} (1976AmZW), 0.845 s {i43} (1971Tr02,1970KlZZ). 
%B-N$weighted average of 0.23 {I3} (1993Ru01) and 0.23 {I5} (1986ReZU, earlier values of 0.23 {I2} in 1986Wa17 and 0.18 {i2} in 1983Re10). Others: 0.36 {i11} (1981En05), 0.8 {i2} (1987PfZX,1982Ga24). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+97}Sr-{+98}Sr)=0.578 fm{+2} {i9} (1996Li25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$144.2|g E2 to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 2.77 ns {I14} in (n,F|g) (|g|g(t),2017Re05), 2.80 ns {i8} (|b|g(t),1989Ma47,1989Ma38) and 2.74 ns {i12} (|g|g(t),1987Oh05) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay. Others: 4 ns {i1} (|b(ce)(t), 1980Sc13); 3.6 ns {I4} (|b(ce)(t), 1979Az01) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay; 4.0 ns {I+30-15} (|g(x ray)(t), 1980ChZM in {+254}Cf SF decay; see {+252}Cf SF decay dataset). 
T$Weighted average of all the above value is 2.80 ns {I8}. 2016Pr01 evaluation gives mean lifetime |t=4200 ps {I200} or T{-1/2}=2.91 ns {I14}. 
MOMM1$|g|g(|q,H) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (1989Wo05) 
MOME2$from reorientation method in Coulomb excitation (2016Cl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$71.0|g E2 to 2+ 
T$weighted average of 21.2 ns {i17} (|g|g(t),2002Lh01), 25 ns {i2} (|b-ce(t),1980Sc13), and 23 ns {I2} (|b-ce(t),1979Az01) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$289.3|g E2 to 2+ and |g|g(|q) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay 
T$weighted average of 80 ps {I6} from |b|g|g(t) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (1989Ma47) and 83.9 ps {I76} from |g|g(t) in (n,F|g) 
MOME2$from reorientation method in Coulomb excitation (2016Cl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay consistent with J=6; negative parity is ruled out since it would require an unreasonably large B(M2) value for 433.2|g; member of g.s. band 
T$weighted average of 11 ps {I6} from |g|g(t) in (n,F|g) and 7.86 ps {I24} from B(E2) of 433.2|g in Coulomb excitation 
MOME2$from reorientation method in Coul. ex. (2016Cl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$655.8|g and 871.4|g to 0+; possible |g to 4+ 
T$from B(E2) value of 655.8|g in Coulomb excitation 
MOME2$from reorientation method in Coulomb excitation (2016Cl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$566|g to 6+; member of g.s. band 
T$from Doppler-profile method (1996Sm04) in {+248}Cm SF decay 
MOME2$from reorientation method in Coulomb excitation (2016Cl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$from re-analysis by 2002PfZX of |g|g(|q) data in 1984Be50 with a configuration=|n9/2[404]~#|n3/2[411], K|p=3+; also proposed by 2002Lh01 based on arguments of hindrances of |g transitions, |b feedings and band head of a possible K=3 band. Note that 1984Be50 give J=2 based on their |g|g(|q) data and a 1837|g to 0+ ground state. But the 1837|g was not observed by 2002Lh01. It is also pointed out by 2002Lh01 that J=3 cannot be rejected by |g|g(|q) of the 1693-144 cascade in 1984Be50. 
T$weighted average of 13 ns {I3} from |g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay (2004Li66) and 7.1 ns {I8} from |g|g(t) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (2002Lh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$suggested by 2002Lh01 in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay based on possible band assignment; 1544.5|g to 4+ and 140.6|g to (3+); possible |b{+-} feeding from (3+); possible 1111|g to 6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$689.6|g to 8+; member of g.s. band 
T$from Doppler-profile method (1996Sm04) in {+248}Cm SF decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+:4+)
level_comment:
J$1979.6|g to 2+ and 286.2|g to (3+). 2002Lh01 in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay suggest (2-) from model calculation with configuration=|n9/2[404]~#|n5/2[532]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay consistent with J=2; 2315.8|g to 0+. Note that (2+) is inconsistent with a possible strong |b{+-} feeding from 0(-) parent in {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay (115 ms) as also given in 2002Lh01, which could imply that this level could be |b{+-} fed mostly by the decay of (3+) isomer in {+98}Rb rather than by the decays of both parent states equally as assumed by 2002Lh01, if the (2+) assignment can be confirmed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$2100.2|g to 4+ and 1666.8|g to 6+; possible K|p=6+ bandhead 
T$from |g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay (2004Li66) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3,4)
level_comment:
J$2498.2|g to 4+ and possible |b{+-} feeding from (3+). configuration=|n3/2[411]|n5/2[532], K|p=4- proposed by 2002PfZX as an analogy with the 1619, 4- level in {+100}Sr based on decay pattern and the hindrance of the 2498|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$2.80 ns {I8} (|b|g|g(t),1989Ma47,1989Ma38), 2.74 ns {I12} (|g|g(t),1987Oh05), 4 ns {I1} (|b-ce(t),1980Sc13), 3.6 ns {I4} (1979Az01, |b-ce(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$21.2 ns {I17} (|g|g(t),2002Lh01), 25 ns {I2} (|b-ce(t),1980Sc13), 23 ns {I3} (1979Az01,|b-ce(t)) 
$|b{-2}=-0.23 {I2} from two-level mixing analysis (2016Pa03) 
$Mixing of the first two 0+ states is 8.6% (2016Pa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$from re-analysis by 2002PfZX of |g|g(|q) data in 1984Be50 with configuration=|n9/2[404]~#|n3/2[411], K|p=3+; also proposed by 2002Lh01 based on arguments of hindrances of |g transitions, |b feedings and band head of a possible K=3 band. Note that 1984Be50 give J=2 based on their |g|g(|q) data and a 1837|g to 0+ ground state. But the 1837|g was not observed by 2002Lh01. It is also pointed out by 2002Lh01 that J=3 cannot be rejected by |g|g(|q) of the 1693-144 cascade in 1984Be50. 
T$7.1 ns {I8} from |g|g(t) (2002Lh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$2002Lh01 suggest (4+) based on band assignment; 1984Be50 suggest 1 or 2 based on their placement of 1979|g to 0+ ground state, which is now placed from 2124 level to 144 level by 2002Lh01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4+)
level_comment:
J$2002Lh01 suggest (2,3); 1984Be50 give J=1 based on |g|g(|q) but in evaluator's opinion it is difficult to get a unique value since |d(1456|g) has a wide range of values 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in 1984Be50 consistent with J=2 and 2002Lh01 suggest (1,2). Note that (2+) is inconsistent with the possible strong |b{+-} feeding feeding from 0(-) parent as also given in 2002Lh01, which could imply that this level could be |b{+-} fed mostly by the decay of (3+) isomer in this dataset rather than by the decays of both parent states equally as assumed by 2002Lh01, if the (2+) assignment can be confirmed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+:4)
level_comment:
J$configuration=|n3/2[411]~#|n5/2[532], K|p=4- proposed by 2002PfZX as an analogy with the 1619, 4- level in {+100}Sr based on decay pattern and the hindrance of the 2498|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<6141 {I17} from Q(|b{+-}) (for {+98}Rb decay)-S(n)({+98}Sr), where Q(|b{+-})=12054 {I16} and S(n)=5913 {I5} from 2017Wa10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$2.80 ns {I8} (|b|g|g(t),1989Ma47,1989Ma38), 2.74 ns {I12} (|g|g(t),1987Oh05), 4 ns {i1} (|b-ce(t),1980Sc13), 3.6 ns {I4} (1979Az01, |b-ce(t)) 
$g factor=0.38 {i7} (|g|g(|q,H),1989Wo05) 
$Mixing of the first two 2+ states is 1.3% (2016Pa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$21.2 ns {I17} (|g|g(t),2002Lh01), 25 ns {I2} (|b-ce(t),1980Sc13), 23 ns {I3} (1979Az01, |b-ce(t)) 
$|b{-2}=-0.23 {I2} from two-level mixing analysis (2016Pa03) 
$Mixing of the first two 0+ states is 8.6% (2016Pa03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(3+) from re-analysis by 2002PfZX of |g|g(|q) data in 1984Be50 with configuration=|n9/2[404]~#|n3/2[411], K|p=3+; also proposed by 2002Lh01 based on arguments of hindrances of |g transitions, |b feedings and band head of a possible K=3 band. Note that 1984Be50 give J=2 based on their |g|g(|q) data and a 1837|g to 0+ ground state. But the 1837|g was not observed by 2002Lh01. It is also pointed out by 2002Lh01 that J=3 cannot be rejected by |g|g(|q) of the 1693-144 cascade in 1984Be50. 
T$7.1 ns {I8} from |g|g(t) (2002Lh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) (1984Be50) consistent with J=2 and 2002Lh01 suggest (1,2). Note that (2+) is inconsistent with the possible strong |b{+-} feeding feeding as also given in 2002Lh01, which could imply that this level could be |b{+-} fed mostly by the decay of (3+) isomer in {+98}Rb rather than by the decays of both parent states equally as assumed by 2002Lh01, if the (2+) assignment can be confirmed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+1.13 {I1} 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-0.63 {I+32-28} 
T$2016Cl03 use T{-1/2}=2.80 ns {I8} from 1989Ma47 in their GOSIA analysis. other: 2.01 ns {I21} (2016Cl03, using RDDS method, and the intensities of the stopped and in-flight components). This value is lower than 2.77 ns {I6} from B(E2). 2016Cl03 ascribe the disagreement to underestimation of number of counts in the stopped peak due to decrease of the Miniball efficiency for decays occurring after the implantation in the silicon detector. 2016Cl03 deduce a scaling factor of 1.4 from comparison of their measured T{-1/2} and that in the literature. This factor was applied to measured lifetime of a level in {+98}Rb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$2016Cl03 use T{-1/2}=22.8 ns {I14} from average of 21.2 ns {i17} in 2002Lh01 and 25 ns {i2} in 1980Sc13 in their GOSIA analysis. 
T$the uncertainty in lifetime=32.8 ns {I2} quoted by 2016Cl03 as from average of values from 2002Lh01 and 1980Sc13 could be a misprint. 
$E2 matrix element (to 144,2+)=+0.404 {I+14-17} 
$<Q{+2}>=0.33 e{+2}b{+2} {I3} (2016Cl03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$2016Cl03 use T{-1/2}=80 ns {I6} from 1989Ma47 in their GOSIA analysis. 
$E2 matrix element=+1.76 {I5} 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-2.82 {I+21-22} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from 7.86 ps {I6} from GOSIA anlaysis, with a 3% systematic uncertainty added by evaluators 
$E2 matrix element=+2.46 {I+11-10} 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-1.86 {I+33-31} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element (to g.s.)=-0.101 {I8} 
$E2 matrix element (to 215,0+)=+0.41 {I3} 
$E2 matrix element (to 144,2+)=0.07 {I+10-5}, sign not known 
$M1 matrix element (to 144,2+)=0.09 {I+1-2}, sign not known 
$E2 matrix element (to 433,4+)=+0.23 {I+9-8} 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=+0.04 {I+32-20} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$2016Cl03 use T{-1/2}=2.97 ps {I48} from 1996Sm04 in their GOSIA analysis. 
$E2 matrix element=+2.37 {I+17-14} 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-1.4 {I+15-13} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
T$deduced by evaluators from B(E2) value in 2016Cl01. Note that no E2 matrix element or B(E2) value is given in 2016Cl03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-N Recommended value (1993Ru01). See 1986ReZU 
MOMM1,MOME2 $from hfs (LASER) (1991Li05,1990Li28) 
J from hfs (LASER) and analysis of |m (1991Li05,1990Li28) 
T$from 1986ReZU. Others: 0.42 s {I+12-9} (2012Qu01), 0.274 s {I4} (1983Re10), 0.266 s {I5} (1983Wo10), 0.30 s {I3} (1982Ga24), 0.29 s {I4} (1978Ko29), 0.6 s {I2} (1975As04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.464 fm {I24} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+88}Sr,{+100}Sr)=1.867 fm{+2} {I15} (2013An02) 
T$weighted average of 181 ms {I+16-13} (2011Ni01, (ion)|b-correlated decay curve); 165 ms {I24} (1993Ru01); 201 ms {I1} (1986ReZU, supersedes 204 ms {I2} in 1986Wa17); 193 ms {I4} (1987Wo07,1986Wo01), 214 ms {I8} (1983Mu19), 170 ms {I80} (1978Ko29). Other: 200 ms {I20} (1985IaZZ). Uncertainty was increased to 2 ms for value in 1986ReZU in the averaging procedure. Half-lives measured using decay curves for |g, |b, neutrons, |bn and |b(ion) correlations 
$%|b{+-}n: unweighted average of 1.48 {I12} (1993Ru01), 1.1 {I3} (1987PfZX), and 0.75 {I8} (1986ReZU, supersedes 0.73 {I3} in 1986Wa17). 
$|d<r{+2}>({+100}Sr,{+88}Sr)=1.83 fm{+2} {I7} (1988Si06,1990Bu12). Measured by non-optical detection in fast-beam laser spectroscopy. The {+100}Sr isotope was mass separated from fission of uranium by 600-MeV protons. See also 1996Li25 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=387.9 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=102.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.5 (2016Ma12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from Doppler-broadened lineshape (2012Sm02) in {+248}Cm SF decay, quoted uncertainty includes statistical and systematic 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$1201.7|g to (4+); 4- suggested by 1995Pf04 from possible configuration=|n3/2[411]~#|n5/2[532] 
T$unweighted average of 122 ns {I9} (2012Ka36, |g(t) in ({+238}U,F|g)) and 85 ns {I7} (1995Pf04, |g|g(t) in |b{+-} decay). Weighted average is 99 ns {I18}, but with reduced |h{+2}=10.5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from Doppler-broadened lineshape (2012Sm02), statistical uncertainty=0.24 ps, systematic uncertainty=0.21 ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from Doppler-broadened lineshape (2012Sm02), statistical uncertainty=0.10 ps, systematic uncertainty=0.08 ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) (1990Lh01), recommended in the Adopted Levels. Other: 5.15 ns {I20} from |b(ce)(t) (1979Az01). 
$|b{-2}=0.40 {I1} from T{-1/2} and rotational model 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from the Adopted Levels. Other: 85 ns {I7} from |g|g(t) (1995Pf04) 
$Possible configuration=|n3/2[411]~#|n5/2[532] (1995Pf04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<8203 {I23} from Q(|b{+-}) (for {+100}Rb decay)-S(n)({+100}Sr), where Q(|b{+-})=13574 {I21} and S(n)=5371 {I9} from 2017Wa10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<4034 {I23} from Q(|b{+-}) (for {+100}Rb decay)-S(2n)({+100}Sr), where Q(|b{+-})=13574 {I21} and S(2n)=9540 {I8} from 2017Wa10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$weighted av: 121 ms {i6} (1983Wo10), 114 ms {i4} (1986Wa17) 
J$based on strong |b feedings to (5/2+) states in {+101}Y. Could be the n [532]5/2 Nilsson orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$possible g.s. band member 
T$From unresolved 92.2|g and 92.8|g with the assumption that T{-1/2}(92.2|g) |?0.6 ns by analogy with the first excited state in {+99}Sr (1995Lh04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$Assuming similar moment of inertia for {+99}Sr and {+101}Sr, possible member of a rotational band 
E$This questionable level was not adopted 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J,%B-N$from Adopted Levels for {+101}Sr in ENSDF database 
T$ measured by 2011Ni01 from the analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve. Earlier value: 118 ms {I3} (Adopted Levels for {+101}Sr in ENSDF database) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%B-N$Weighted average of 4.8% {i23} (1986ReZS) and 6.0% {i20} (1987PfZX 
T weighted average of 72 ms {i10} (1987PfZX), 69 ms {i15} (1986ReZS) and 68 ms {i8} (1986Hi02). T{-1/2} from |g decay of 93|g and 243|g in {+102}Sr decay (1986Hi02), |b{+-} delayed neutron decay (1987PfZX) or growth and decay of |b counting rate (1986ReZS) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E from 1995Lh03 
T by |b|g(t) and centroid-shift method (1995Lh03) 
J from energy systematics of first 2+ state in other even-strontium isotopes 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T by |b|g(t) and centroid-shift method 
J from energy systematics of first 2+ state in other even-strontium isotopes 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%B-N$from Adopted Levels for {+102}Sr in ENSDF database 
T$ measured by 2011Ni01 from the analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve. Earlier value: 69 ms {I6} (Adopted Levels for {+102}Sr in ENSDF database) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$group of levels, where x<9780 {I330} from Q(|b{+-})({+102}Rb)=14650 {I310} (syst) and S(n)({+102}Sr)=4870 {I110} (2012Wa38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=2.2, %|b{+-}2n=0.01 (1997Mo25) 
E$measured half-life is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+103}Sr 
J$5/2+ from systematics (2012Au07) and theoretical considerations (1997Mo25) 
T$measured by 2015Lo04 from (implanted ions)|b correlated curves in time and position using maximum likelihood method. Other: 68 ms {I+48-20} (2011Ni01, from the same lab as 2015Lo04). See 2015Lo04 for comparison of their experimental value with several theoretical calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=9.2, %|b{+-}2n=0.0 (1997Mo25) 
$Measured |s=15 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?40%. Probability of misidentification of {+106}Sr isotope<0.001% (2010Oh02) 
T$measured by 2015Lo04 from (implanted ions)|b correlated curves in time and position using maximum likelihood method. Other: 43 ms {I+9-7} (2011Ni01, same lab as 2015Lo04). See 2015Lo04 for comparison of their experimental value with several theoretical calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$theoretical %|b{+-}n=19 (2019Mo01) 
J$1/2+ from theoretical considerations (2019Mo01); [5/2+] assumed by the evaluators from systematics 
T$from 2015Lo04; Also: 40 ms {I+36-13} in 2011Ni01 from a maximum-likelihood analysis of HI-|b(t); assumed to correspond to the {+105}Sr g.s. 
CONF$5/2+[413] assumed by the evaluators on the basis of J{+|p} from systematics 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=11.1, %|b{+-}2n=0.03 (1997Mo25) 
$Measured |s=15 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?40%. Probability of misidentification of {+106}Sr isotope<0.001% (2010Oh02) 
T$measured by 2015Lo04 from (implanted ions)|b correlated curves in time and position using maximum likelihood method. See 2015Lo04 for comparison of their experimental value with several theoretical calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Measured |s=1 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?40% 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight in 2010Oh02, as communicated to the evaluator by T. Kubo in an e-mail reply of July 14, 2010. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the calculated value of 34.7 ms (1997Mo25) 
$Probability of misidentification of {+107}Sr isotope=0.48% (2010Oh02) 
J$ 7/2- predicted in calculations (1997Mo25) 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=28.3, %|b{+-}2n=3.2 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$As shown in A/Q particle identification plot in Fig. 1 of 2019Si33, a larger number of events were assigned to {+76}Y as compared to only two in the earlier work from RIBF-RIKEN (2017Su26). 
E$it is assumed that the observed decay events correspond to the ground state of {+76}Y 
J$proposed configurations: |p5/2[422]~#|n3/2[312] at a deformation after the crossing or |p3/2[301]~#|n3/2[431] before the crossing; however, J|p=1- for the g.s. of mirror nucleus favors the configuration after the crossing, and also consistent with Gallagher-Moszkowski (GM) rules (2019Si33) 
T$from (implanted ions)|b-correlated decay curve for nine observed correlated events, and analysis by logarithmic binning (Schmidt) method (2019Si33) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$From detection of |b{++} and |g events, 2002Fa13 conclude that |b{++} decay mode is dominant while proton emission branch is expected to be small. The ground state is probably unbound towards proton emission. 
J$probable 5/2[422] orbital from comparison of neighboring nuclides and microscopic-macroscopic calculations (1999Ja02) 
T$from time-correlated events (2001Ki13,2002Fa13,2007WeZX), total of 12 events associated with the {+77}Y isotope. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from timing of |b radiation. Weighted average of 50 ms {I8} (2001Ga24) and 55 ms {I+9-6} (2001Ki13,2002Fa13,2007WeZX). Other: 47 ms {I5} (2007Na13) from timing of 281|g correlated with positrons from {+78}y decay. The 281|g is possibly from a level of this energy in {+78}y. Since assignment of 281|g is not yet certain, the half-life from 2007Na13 is not used in the averaging procedure. Weighted average would be 49 ms 5 if this half-life is included 
J$from syst of N=Z nuclides; possible super-allowed Fermi transition, assumed to Be the single g.s. to g.s. transition (2001Ga24). Proposed configuration=|n5/2[422]~#|p5/2[422], T=1 (1998Uu01) as IAS of {+78}Sr g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,J$x |<500 (1998Uu01), estimated from 2-quasiparticle rotor model calculations as a function of deformation without residual p-n interaction. Inclusion of residual p-n interaction also predicts a low-lying 5+ state but in that case it may be g.s., depending on the value of the deformation parameter. Possible |b feeding of 4+ and 6+ states in {+78}Sr supports 5+ assignment. Proposed configuration=|n5/2[422]|p5/2[422], T=0 (1998Uu01) 
T$from timing of |g rays. Average of 5.7 s {I+7-6} (2007WeZX, 2002Fa13,2001Ki13) and 5.8 s {I6} (1998Uu01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J,T$ from 'adopted levels'. This isomer is populated strongly in the reaction used by 2007Na13, implant-decay correlations for high-energy protons suggest that |?90% events feed this isomer. But the half-life is too long to correlate it with prompt |g rays feeding this isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=369 ps {I+77-54} (2020Ll01) for fully stripped ion, determined using a 2D |h{+2}-minimization procedure, as described in 2016Mi04 (Phys. Rev. C 93, 024318). Systematic uncertainties have been included 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$probable configuration=5/2[422] (1987LeZT,1988Bu09,1990Sa06) 
T$weighted average of 14.9 s {I6} (1992Mu12) and 14.4 s {I15} (1992Gr09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$ from 1998Do04. Others: 33.8 s {I6} (1981Li12) and 38 s {I1} (1982De36) 
J$ probable |e,|b{++} feedings to 2+, 4+ and 6+ levels in {+80}Sr (see {+80}Y |e decay); configuration=|p5/2[422]+|n3/2[301] (2000Do10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$ weighted average of 5.0 s {I5} (2001No07) and 4.7 s {I3} (1998Do04). 
T$ 6.8 s {I5} for fully-ionized (bare) {+80}Y (2001No07) 
J$M3(+E4) |g to (4-); configuration=|p5/2[422]-|n3/2[301] (2000Do10) 
$ |b{-2}=0.37 (2000Do10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T weighted average of 72.0 s {I15} (1981Li12), 74 s {I3} (1982De36) and 69.0 s {I11} (1993Mi11), from |g(t), and 70 s {I5} (1982De36) from |b(t). No evidence for the 5-min activity reported by 1970HaYC (1981Li12). 
$T{-1/2}=70.0 s {I14} from w.a. of 1981Li12 and 1993Mi11 data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J E2 |g to (9/2+); |g to (11/2+). 
T from recoil distance Doppler shift (1994Jo12) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 
Q(transition)=3.59 {I+28-23} (2002Ka61) from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
Q(transition)=2.9 {I5} (2002Ka61) from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
J E2 |g to (13/2+); |g to (15/2+). 
T from DSA in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). Other: 0.68 ps {I+32-17} from DSA in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 0.26 ps {I+5-4} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) and 0.34 ps {I+10-7} from DSA in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 
Q(transition)=2.52 {I+23-21} (2002Ka61) from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
Q(transition)=2.06 {I+36-23} (2002Ka61) from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
T determined from spectra gated from above the 1227|g. Other T{-1/2}: 0.15 ps {I6} from DSA in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T determined from spectra gated from above the 1098|g. 
Q(transition)=2.5 {I+9-6} (2002Ka61) from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T |?0.20 ps, without correction for feeding (1994Jo12), in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 
Q(transition)=2.5 {I+8-4} (2002Ka61) from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T determined from spectra gated from above the transition. 
Q(transition)=2.52 {I+23-21} (2002Ka61). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T determined from spectra gated from above the transition. 
Q(transition)=2.06 {I+36-23} (2002Ka61). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_comment:
From 1993Mi11 only. J|p and band assignment not adopted (level assigned to different band in ({+32}S,2|ap|g)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.1 to 0+ {+82}Sr. 
Configuration=((|p (422)5/2+)(|n (413)7/2+)) or (|p [301]3/2-)(|n [301]1/2-) 
T$from 1998Oi02; others: 9.5 s {I4} (1981Li12,1981HaYZ) and 9.5 s {I5} (1982De36). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
J$|?(16) suggested by 2003Le08; (17) VIM (2016Da01). Other: |?(20) (1995Da30) 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$heavier odd-A Y isotopes possess a 9/2+ isomeric state which decreases in energy with decreasing neutron number, (E(9/2+)-E(gs)= 909 keV in {+89}Y, 381 keV in {+87}Y and 19.8 keV in {+85}Y). Strong |e feeding of the 62-keV isomeric level in {+83}Y from {+83}Zr with J|p=(1/2-) suggests that the isomeric state has low spin, and the 9/2+ has become the ground state in {+83}Y. 
T$weighted average of 7.06 min {I8} (1972Tu07) and 7.1 min {I1} (1976Li27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$from 1972Tu07. Others: 2.7 min {I3} (1976Li27), 2.5 min {I3} (1987Ra06). 
J$E3 62|g to 9/2+; log| {Ift}=5.3 from {+83}Zr parent with J|p=(1/2-) 
%EC+%B+$from 1987Ra06. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from delayed coincidence of 243|g-97|g (centroid shift) in {+83}Zr |e decay 
J$E2 97|g to 9/2+; log| {If{+1u}t}=8.7 from {+83}Zr parent with J|p=(1/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.1 from {+83}Zr parent with J|p=(1/2-), 319|g to 7/2-, 688|g to 5/2-, 758.5|g to 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.1 from {+83}Zr parent with J|p=(1/2-), 1547|g to 7/2-, 1751|g to (5/2+), 1916|g to 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
J$(E2) 1079.5|g to 21/2+; band assignment 
MOMM1$from transient field technique (1998LuZU,2011StZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from effective T{-1/2}=0.69 ps {I7} (1988Li07), measured with RDDS, however, not corrected for side feeding. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.9 ps {I3} (1988Li07) from RDDS, 0.90 ps {I14} (1989Cr08) from RDDS, and 1.04 ps {I14} (1989Cr08) from DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from RDDS in 1989Cr08. Other: 1.8 ps {I3} (1988Li07) from RDDS, however, not corrected for side feeding. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM in 1989Cr08. Others: 0.69 ps {I14} (1988Li07) and 0.49 ps {I14} (1989Cr08), both from RDDS, however, not corrected for side feeding. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from effective lifetime of T{-1/2}=1.0 ps {I3} (1988Li07,1989Cr08), both from RDDS, however, not corrected for side feeding 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from effective lifetime of T{-1/2}=0.69 ps {I14} (1989Cr08) from RDDS, however, not corrected for side feeding. Other: effective T{-1/2}=0.9 ps {I3} (1988Li07) from RDDS, also not corrected for side feeding. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from effective T{-1/2}=3.1 ps {I3} (1989Cr08) from RDDS, however, not corrected for sidefeeding. Other: effective T{-1/2}=4.8 ps {I3} (1988Li07) from RDDS also not corrected for sidefeeding. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.9 ps {I2} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=1.0 ps {I+3-2}. Other T{-1/2}=0.43 ps {I7} from 1989Cr08 
$Transition quadrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.3 {I+3-2}, |b{-2}=0.23 {I+2-3} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.6 ps {I+2-1} (2019Ro14), from gating below only, |t(side feeding)=0.3 ps {I+10-2}. Other T{-1/2}=0.43 ps {I+11-9} from 1997Jo03 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.3 {I+2-3}, |b{-2}=0.24 {I+2-3} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.35 ps {I3} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=1.1 ps {I3}. Other T{-1/2}=0.26 ps {I6} from 1989Cr08; not listed in the ENSDF database 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.5 {I1}, |b{-2}=0.26 {I1} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.22 ps {I+13-11} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=0.7 ps {I+8-2}. Other T{-1/2}=0.34 ps {I+8-4} from 1994Jo16; not cited by 2019Ro14. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=3.1 {I+13-6}, |b{-2}=0.31 {I+13-7} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 27/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.35 ps {I+11-7} (2019Ro14), from gating below only, |t(side feeding)=0.2 ps {I+11-2}. Other T{-1/2}=0.20 ps from 1997Jo03. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=1.9 {I2}, |b{-2}=0.21 {I2} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.13 ps {I2} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=1.0 ps {I5}. Other T{-1/2}=0.20 ps {I5} from 1989Cr08; 0.194 ps {I+35-28} (1997Jo03). Value from 1989Cr08 is not listed in the ENSDF database. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=3.1 {I+3-2}, |b{-2}=0.31 {I+3-2} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.16 ps {I+9-6} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=0.9 ps {I+3-2}. Other T{-1/2}=0.19 ps {I+3-6} from 1994Jo16, not cited by 2019Ro14. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.7 {I+8-5}, |b{-2}=0.28 {I+8-6} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.20 ps {I6} (2019Ro14) |t(side feeding)=0.6 ps {I+12-5}. Other T{-1/2}=0.20 ps {I+8-7} from 1997Jo03. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=1.9 {I+4-2}, |b{-2}=0.20 {I+4-2} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 33/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.15 ps {I2} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=0.4 ps {I1}. Other T{-1/2}: |<0.27 ps, effective value from 1989Cr08; 0.222 ps {I+35-28} (1997Jo03). 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.1 {I+2-1}, |b{-2}=0.21 {I+2-1} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.78 ps {I+14-11} (2019Ro14) from gating below only, |t(side feeding)=0.7 ps {I+5-3}. Other T{-1/2}<0.46 ps from 1994Jo16; not cited by 2019Ro14. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=1.2 {I+7-5}, |b{-2}=0.12 {I1} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (35/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.07 ps {I+3-2} (2019Ro14) |t(side feeding)=0.4 ps {I2}. Other T{-1/2}<0.24 ps (effective value) from 1997Jo03. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.5 {I+5-4}, |b{-2}=0.25 {I+5-4} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 37/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.04 ps {I2} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=0.25 ps {I5}. Other T{-1/2}=0.049 ps {I+28-21} from 1997Jo03. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=3.0 {I+1-6}, |b{-2}=0.27 {I+13-6} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.24 ps {I+10-9} (2019Ro14) from gating below only, |t(side feeding)=0.07 ps {I+79-7} 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=1.8 {I+5-3}, |b{-2}=0.18 {I+5-3} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (39/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.04 ps {I2} (2019Ro14); |t(side feeding)=0.2 ps {I+4-1} 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.7 {I+11-5}, |b{-2}=0.28 {I+11-5} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 41/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.05 ps {I2} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=0.20 ps {I+8-7}. Other T{-1/2}=0.014 ps {I+56-7} from 1997Jo03. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.2 {I+6-3}, |b{-2}=0.19 {I+7-3} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (41/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.10 ps {I3} (2019Ro14) from gating below only, |t(side feeding)=0.01 ps {I+22-1} 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.0 {I+4-3}, |b{-2}=0.20 {I+4-3} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (43/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.16 ps {I+11-7} or T{-1/2}=0.11 ps {I+8-5} (2019Ro14), effective value, not corrected for side feeding. The value given in the data field is an upper limit. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})>1.1 {I+4-3}, |b{-2}>0.11 {I+4-3} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 45/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.05 ps {I+3-2} (2019Ro14), |t(side feeding)=0.03 ps {I+5-3}. Other T{-1/2}=0.014 {I+55-7} from 1997Jo03. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=1.7 {I+5-4}, |b{-2}=0.15 {I+5-4} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (45/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.03 ps {I+4-2} (2019Ro14); |t(side feeding)=0.09 ps {I+17-7} 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.9 {I+49-11}, |b{-2}=0.30 {I+49-13} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (49/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.01 ps {I+3-1} (2019Ro14); |t(side feeding)=0.02 ps {I+5-2} 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})=2.9 {I+140-13}, |b{-2}=0.30 {I+141-13} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (49/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.10 ps {I+3-2} or T{-1/2}=0.069 ps {I+21-14} (2019Ro14), effective value, not corrected for side feeding. The value given in the data field is an upper limit. Other T{-1/2}=0.007 ps {I+35-7} in 1997Jo03 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})>0.9 {I1}, |b{-2}>0.08 {I1} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (53/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$Measured mean lifetime |t=0.08 ps {I+4-3} or T{-1/2}=0.055 ps {I+28-21} (2019Ro14), effective value, not corrected for side feeding. The value given in the data field is an upper limit. 
$Transition qudrupole moment (Q{-t})>0.9 {I+2-1}, |b{-2}=0.09 {I+2-1} (2019Ro14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$4,5,6 from log| {Ift}=6.3 to 6+, 2808 in {+84}Sr daughter ({+84}Y |e decay (39.5 min)); (6+) based on identification of |g-vibrational band up to (7+) in {+84}Sr daughter ({+84}Zr |e decay, 2000Do10) 
T$weighted average from 43 min {I2} (1962Ya02), 39 min {I2} (1962Ma44), 38.5 min {I20} (1971Do01), 40 min {I4} (1976Ia01), and 39 min {I1} (1981DeZD). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$log| {Ift}=4.5 to 0+, g.s., and log| {Ift}=4.5 to 2+, 793, in {+84}Sr daughter ({+84}Y |e decay (4.6 s)) 
T$from 1976Ia01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=0 |g from (4-), 210 keV; |p=(+) from E2 |g to (6+), g.s. 
$Possible configuration=|p1g{-9/2}~#|n1g{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$0 to 4 from E2 and D |g cascade to 1+, 67 keV; 4 to 8 from D plus D |g cascade to (6+) g.s.. |p=(-) from (E1) |g to (4+), 112 keV 
$Configuration=|p3/2[301]~#|n5/2[422] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
%EC+%B+$from Adopted Levels 
$No |g decay to {+84}Y g.s. was observed by 2000Do10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$1994Ch01 assumed that their lowest observed level was the (6+), 39.5 min isomer at about 500 keV above the 1+, 4.6 s g.s.. However we adopted in this evaluation an inversed order of these states, having the (6+) state the ground state, and the 1+ the higher lying state (see adopted levels, gammas dataset) 
J$the authors deduced deformation parameter |b|?0.17 from B(E2) values for the stretched E2 transitions. The signature splitting observed for the |p=+ band agrees with J|p=6+ (1993Ch03) 
T$adopted value (see Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$the authors also give T{-1/2}=2.1 ps {I8} in another of their tables, it is not clear which of the two is the correct value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$existence of isomer deduced by observation of 112.4|g(t) decay curve with two components 
J$|DJ=0 |g from (4-), 210 keV; |p=(+) from E2 |g to (6+), g.s. 
$Possible configuration=|p1g{-9/2}~#|n1g{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$existence of isomer deduced by observation of prompt and delayed |g's, |g(t) measurements for the delayed |g's (61.7, 63.4, 80.9, 98.1, 112.4, and 148.6), and coincidence measurement (112.4|g and 61.7|g, gated by the 98.1|g and 148.6|g, respectively) 
J$0 to 4 from E2 and D |g cascade to 1+, 67 keV; 4 to 8 from D plus D |g cascade to (6+) g.s.. |p=(-) from (E1) |g to (4+), 112 keV 
$Configuration=|p3/2[301]~#|n5/2[422] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=1; systematics of odd-A Y isotopes. 
$T{-1/2}: weighted average of 2.9 h {I2} (1966Ho04), 2.55 h {I10} (1965Ni02), and 2.68 h {I5} (1963Do07). Others: 1963Bu06, 1962Ya02, 1962Pa02, 1962Ma44, 1949Ro03 (authors assigned the observed 3.7-h activity to {+84}Y but it most likely belonged to {+85}Y) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4; comparison of |m with Schmidt values. 
$T{-1/2}: weighted average of 4.7 h {I2} (1966Ho04), 4.9 h {I3} (1965Ni02), and 5.0 h {I2} (1963Do07). Others: 1963Bu06, 1962Pa02, 1952Ca29 
%IT$From RUL if J|p=9/2+ and J|p(g.s.)=1/2-. 
MOMM1$low-temperature nuclear orientation (1988Be46). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=3; |DJ=2, E2 |g to (1/2)-; comparison of |m with Schmidt diagram values 
$T{-1/2}: weighted average of 176 ns {I7} from {+72}Ge({+16}O,p2n|g) and 182 {I10} from |e decay (7.86 min). 
MOMM1$from g factor=+0.542 {I9} (time-dependent PAD in external magnetic field in {+85}Rb({+3}He,3n) reaction (2000Io02). Other: +1.33 {I8} (1982RaZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, dipole |g to (9/2)+; log| {Ift}=7.5 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.8) from (7/2+). Positive parity is tentatively suggested in ({+37}Cl,2p2n|g), but log| {Ift} value disfavors such an assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2,Q |g to (7/2)+; |DJ=1,(M1+E2) gammas to (9/2)+ and (13/2+). 
$Large differences in branching ratios of |g rays between the reaction and decay studies, the evaluators have adopted data from the reaction work. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$probable |b feeding from (7/2+); gammas to (5/2)+ and (9/2)+. 5/2+,7/2+ is not likely if 208.0|g to (11/2-) is confirmed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2,9/2)
level_comment:
J$probable |b feeding from (7/2+), log {Ift}=6.8; gammas to (7/2)+ and (9/2)+; possible |g to (5/2)+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$probable allowed |b feeding from (7/2+), log {Ift}=5.5; gammas to (7/2)+ and (11/2+) 
E$this level may be the same as 2427 populated in ({+3}He,d), if |g to (11/2+) is incorrectly assigned 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (p,p'); IAR of 1355, 5/2+ level in {+85}Sr, confirmed by comparison of |G{-p} with the spectroscopic factor of the parent level in {+84}Sr(d,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (p,p'); IAR of 2325, (5/2)+ level in {+85}Sr confirmed by comparison of |G{-p} with the spectroscopic factor of the parent level in {+84}Sr(d,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=3.2 {I11} 
$E(p)(lab)=4343 {I15} 
E,J$IAR of the 1355, 5/2+ level in {+85}Sr 
WIDTHP$from (2J+1)|G{-p}=10 keV {I3} and J|p=5/2+ of the parent level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.49 {I12} 
$E(p)(lab)=4381 {I15} 
E$IAR of the 1403, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=1.2 {I3} 
E,J$IAR of the 1793, 3/2+,5/2+ level in {+85}Sr 
$E(p)(lab)=4794 {I15} 
WIDTHP (2J+1)|G{-p}=7.4 keV {I16}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.04 {I2} 
E$IAR of the 1842, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 
$E(p)(lab)=4857 {I15} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.8 {I2} 
E,J$IAR of the 2325, (5/2)+ level in {+85}Sr 
$E(p)(lab)=5331 {I15} 
WIDTHP From (2J+1)|G{-p}=11 keV {I3} and J|p=5/2+ of the parent level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.08 {I2} 
$E(p)(lab)=5521 {I15} 
E$IAR of the 2496, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.43 {I13} 
E$IAR of the 2527, 3/2+,5/2+ level in {+85}Sr 
$E(p)(lab)=5547 {I15} 
WIDTHP (2J+1)|G{-p}=7.2 keV {I18}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.07 {I2} 
$E(p)(lab)=5617 {I15} 
E$IAR of the 2602, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.013 {I3} 
$E(p)(lab)=5766 {I15} 
E$IAR of the 2748, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.13 {I3} 
$E(p)(lab)=6322 {I15} 
E$IAR of the 3301, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.09 {I2} 
$E(p)(lab)=6488 {I15} 
E$IAR of the 3455, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2J+1)|G{-p}/|G{-p}(theory).=0.12 {I3} 
E$IAR of the 3582, 1/2+ level in {+85}Sr 
$E(p)(lab)=6625 {I15} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$the angular correlation of the 852-983-795 cascade is consistent with stretched quadrupole transitions. 
T$other: 4.4 ps {I8} (1985BuZP). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
MOMM1$static nuclear orientation (1988Be46). 
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.2513 fm {I23} (2013An02), based on measured value in 2007Ch07 
J$|b spectrum to 2+ level in {+86}Sr has 2-yes shape; log| {Ift}=6.3 to 3-. 
T$from 1972Em01. Others: 15 h {I1} (1962Ki04), 14.6 h {I2} (1951Hy24), 14.6 h (1951Ca46) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E2(+M1) |g to 4-. Probable member of the (|p2p{-1/2})(|n1g{-9/2}) multiplet. 
T$from |g|g(t) (2010Ru07) 
MOMM1$TDPAD method (2010Ru07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1$static nuclear orientation (1988Be46). 
J$(E3) |g to (5)- 
T$from decay curve for 218|g. Value adopted here is from weighted average of 47.2 min {I4} (2010Ru07), 48 min {I2} (1972Si11), 48 min {I1} (1962Ki04), 49.0 min {I15} (1961Ha17) 
%IT$from IT decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$differential perturbed angular correlation (1968Tr11) 
J$E1 |g from 1+. E2 |g to 4-. 
T$weighted average of 29 ns {I4} (2010Ru07, |g|g(t) in in-beam |g-ray study) and 28.5 ns {I21} (|g|g(t) in {+86}Zr |e decay, 1968Tr11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from TDPAD in {+86}Sr(p,n) and {+85}Rb({+3}He,2n) (2000Io02), reanalysis in 2010Ru07 to give g=+0.63 {I2}, instead of -0.083 {I3} in 2000Io02. 
J$(E1) transition to (5)-; L({+3}He,t)=6 for a 292 {I20} group 
T$|g(t) (2010Ru07). Other: 125 ns {I6} (2000Io02, same group as 2010Ru07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, dipole |g to (8+). In ({+3}He,t), possibly a doublet with L=(3+10) giving J|p=(2-,3-) for one of the levels and (9+) for the other 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, (E2) |g to (8+); excitation function 
T$From recoil-distance method in ({+14}N,4n|g) (1984Bu26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12(-)
level_comment:
J$band structure in {+52}Cr({+37}Cl,2pn|g) and {+76}Ge({+14}N,4n|g) |DJ=1, D+Q gammas to 11(-); D+Q |g to (12-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13(+)
level_comment:
J$band structure in {+52}Cr({+37}Cl,2pn|g) and {+76}Ge({+14}N,4n|g) |DJ=2, Q |g to 11(+); |DJ=1, D |g to (12+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14(+)
level_comment:
J$band structure in {+52}Cr({+37}Cl,2pn|g) and {+76}Ge({+14}N,4n|g) |DJ=1, D |g to 13(+); |DJ=2, Q |g to 12(+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15-)
level_comment:
J$band structure in {+52}Cr({+37}Cl,2pn|g) and {+76}Ge({+14}N,4n|g) |DJ=1, D(+Q) |g to (14-), |DJ=2, Q |g to (13-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (16-)
level_comment:
J$band structure in {+52}Cr({+37}Cl,2pn|g) and {+76}Ge({+14}N,4n|g) |DJ=1, D+Q |g to (15-); |DJ=2, Q |g to (14-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T,G$from time-differential perturbed angular correlation (1968Tr11). Other: 29 ns {I3} from |g|g(t) (1966Hy01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$7- was suggested in 2000Io02 
$g=-0.083 {I3} (2000Io02), but reanalyzed by some of the same authors, with revised g=+0.63 {I2}, |m=+3.78 {I12} (2010Ru07) 
G$the experimental value agrees well with -0.084 27 derived from configuration=(|p2p{-1/2}|n1g{-9/2}){-5-} coupled to 2+ phonon state (2000Io02). However, 2010Ru07 performs a new analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1984Bu26 propose J=11. However, J|p=(12+) is more likely from A{-2} and A{-4} values of 933|g(|q), and from a statement by the the authors that excitation function and |g(|q) of 933|g are similar to those of 1107|g from 1325, (10+) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
MOMM1 from 2007Ch07 using laser spectroscopy 
$|D<r{+2}>=+0.057 fm{+2} relative to {+89}Y (2007Ch07) 
J$J from atomic-beam resonance (1975Ru06) and |p from L=1 in ({+3}He,d). 
T$weighted average of 79.6 h {i2} (1984Pr01), and 80.3 h {i3} (1969Zo04); both from {+87}Y |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$ %IT and %|e+%B calculated from measured I{-|b+}=0.75 {I5} and theoretical |e/|b+ ratio for decay to {+87}Sr. 
J J from atomic-beam resonance (1975Ru06) and |p from L=4 in ({+3}He,d). 
T from 1984Pr01 by |g(t); others: 12.5 {I2} (1967Mi13) and 13.2 {I2} (1969Zo04). All values are from {+87}Y |e decay. 
MOMM1 from 2007Ch07 using laser spectroscopy other: 6.05 {I7} (1991Hi04) by nuclear magnetic resonance on oriented nuclei and relative to 6.23 {I7} for {+89m}Y, 6.10 {I+32-15} (1978Ma02) by nuclear orientation 
MOME2 from 2007Ch07 using laser spectroscopy 
$|D<r{+2}>=+0.032 fm{+2} relative to the ground state (2007Ch07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$From intensity arguments in (p,|g). It is unlikely to populate the 1404.47 level at 13/2+ in this reaction Also as this level is populated by feeding from a 7/2- at 1979 keV, there is very little liklihood that this level is the same as the 13/2+ level at 1404.47 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$From excitation in (p,n|g) J|p is limited to 9/2-,11/2+, or 13/2. In addtion |g(|q) for the 1210|g transition to the 9/2+ level at 380 is consistent only with J=11/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (p,t) from J|p=1/2- and 5/2- ruled out in analyzing power measurements in (p,|a),(pol p,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$(p,n|g) resonance data allows 3/2+ or 5/2+, while excitation data rules out 5/2+. (p,|a),(pol p,|a) data rule out 5/2- and 3/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$average of 1851 {i8} from (|a,p), 1848 {i4} from ({+3}He,d), 1857 {i5} from (p,t) and 1846 {i3} from (p,|a); other: 1846.7 in (p,|g). 
J$L=0 in (p,t) from 1/2-, L=1 in ({+3}He,d) and (|a,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) (p,2n|g). However, (p,|a),(pol p,|a) data indicate 11/2+. In (p,n|g), the authors give 9/2-,11/2- from excitation, but decay to 5/2- makes the 11/2- assignment very unlikely 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J$allowed values from angular distribution and analyzing powers from (p,|a) are (9/2-,11/2+) narrowed by |g to 5/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
J$L=4 in ({+3}He,d). If the 1410 |g to 5/2- is from this level, J{+|p} is 7/2+; the alternative is that the 7/2-,9/2- 2202 level is also populated in the {+87}Zr |e+|b+ decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J$J|p=15/2- + 7/2+ is assigned from |s(|q) and analyzing power in (p,|a)(pol p,|a) for the 2365 + 2367 doublet. J|p=15/2- is established for the 2367 level giving J|p=7/2+ for the 2365 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E average of 2407 {I4} from ({+3}He,d), 2413 {I5} from (p,t), and 2408 {I3}; other: 2408.3 from (p,|g). 
J$L=2 in ({+3}He,d) and |g to J|p=1/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$From stretched quadrupole presumed E2 to 13/2+ level established by angular correlations in (|a,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
E$Average of 2445 {i2} from (p,|g) and 2451 {i5} from (p,t) 
J L=3 in (p,t) from J|p=1/2- and from comparison of primary |g strength in (p,|g) with the |g strength to the 381 level, it follows J|p=5/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from DCO of |g to 21/2+ level. Assigned as 23/2+ in previous evaluation (2009He09), but the assignment of (19/2+) is still consistent with angular distribution and DCO measurements, and fits better with systematics of yrast states of N=48 isotones (see 1998Sc22 for more detailed discussion) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J from from |g angular distribution in (|a,2n|g). Assigned 25/2 in previous evaluation (2002He09) and changed due to having re-assigned the daughter state to (19/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J from from |g angular distribution in (|a,2n|g). Assigned 25/2 in earlier evaluation (2009He09) and changed due to having re-assigned the daughter state to (19/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2-)
level_comment:
J from (D+Q) |g to (21/2-) level and |g to (19/2-). and feeding from a |DJ=1 transition from a (25/2-) level itself fed from a (27/2-) bandhead level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+,13/2+)
level_comment:
J$Previously (7/2+,9/2+), however as the logft value is still consistent with 13/2+, it is not clear that this level can be unambiguously differentiated from the 13/2+ 1405 level in the Adopted Set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_comment:
J$from Adopted Levels. Assigned (11/2-) in 1998Sc22, although no DCO ratios were obtained for populating or depopulating transitions, and the authors do not discuss on what experimental basis this assignment was made 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_comment:
J$Originally assigned 27/2(+) in 1998Sc22. However as the authors note, the B(E1) strength for the 108 transition feeding the level from the 5935 state with (29/2-) exceeds RUL. No other experimental information is sufficient to adopt a definite value for parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$As the authors note, if a positive parity, this would result in excessively large B(M2)(W.u.) values for the |DJ=2 {I615} and 706 transitions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Based on subsequent measurements, it seems likely that the 170 keV |g depopulating this level is the same as that depopulating the 2649 keV level and therefore this level is not included in the Adopted Levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$other: <0.1 ns (1988Ko08). 
J$assignment in Adopted Levels is (19/2+) and decay includes |g to (17/2+) level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
level_comment:
J$other: from comparison of primary |g strength with the |g strength to the 381 level, it follows J{+|p}=5/2+,7/2-, (1976PiZM). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+,7/2+
level_comment:
J$other: from comparison of primary |g strength with the |g strength to the 381 level, it follows J{+|p}=5/2- (1976PiZM). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
E$Could correspond to the 2995.6 keV (17/2+), 2996 keV 5/2+, or 2996.1 keV (7/2,9/2,11/2) levels in the Adopted Levels. Evaluators assume the 5/2+ assignment at these higher energies is more likely. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Observed by 1973Mo11 only and the relative intensity in their spectrum is approximately 1% of that of the ground state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+ & 9/2-
level_comment:
$|s=52.2 
J assignments in Adopted Levels are (7/2+) and (9/2-). 
E,J other: 1975Pe01 report a level at 2270 with J{+|p}=(9/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$average of 79.9 h {I7} and 81.3 h {I7} from 388.5|g(t) and 81.2 h {I8} and 80.1 h {I10} from 484.8|g(t) (2019Ja03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
E$from the Adopted Levels of {+87}Y in the ENSDF database 
T$weighted average of 13.56 h {I12} and 13.52 h {I29} from 380.8|g(t) (2019Ja03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=3 on 0+ target; |b{++} spectrum of decay to 2+ level has unique-forbidden shape (1963Rh01), analyzing power in (pol d, |a) 
T$weighted average of 106.63 d {I5} ( 2005Am01), 106.62 d {I4} (2012Fi12, corrected value of 106.63 d {I4} from 2002Un02,1982HoZJ), 106.65 d {I13} (1997Ma75), 106.66 d {I5} (1983Wa26), 106.612 d 32 (1980Ho17), 107.1 d {I14} (1976Bo19) and 106.6 d {I4} (1975La16). The uncertainty of the 1980Ho17 measurement was increased from 0.014 d to 0.032 d following 2005Am01 
MOME2,MOMM1$from resonance cell laser spectroscopy (2007Ch07). 
$|d<r{+2}>{+89,88}=+0.009 fm{+2} {I1} (2013An02, 2007Ch07). 
$configuration=|p2p{-1/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=5 on 0+ target; L(p,d)=4 on 1/2- target, analyzing power in (d,|a),(pol d,|a). C{+2}S(p,d) and C{+2}S(d,t) fit the (2J+1)-rule if J=5. 
T$From centroid shift method in {+85}Rb(|a,n|g) (1988Ko08). Other: 0.7 ns {I2} from RDM in {+85}Rb(|a,n|g) (1973BrXF). 
$configuration=|p2p{-1/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=0+2 on 0+ target; L(p,d)=1 on 1/2- target. 
T$weighted average of 0.301 ms {I5} (1959Li44), 0.37 ms {I3} (1955Hy29), 0.30 ms {I3} (1967Iv04) and 0.300 ms {I3} (1974Ba88) 
$configuration=|p2p{-1/2} |n2p{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4 on 9/2+ target. C{+2}S({+3}He,d) and C{+2}S(|a,t) fit the (2J+1)-rule if J=(8,9). E3 443|g to 5- rules out 9+. 
T$weighted average of 13.4 ms {I6} (1974Ba06), 13.9 ms {I3} (1975Va16), 13.5 ms {I5} (1974Fi18), 14.5 ms {I7} (1962Mo19), 14.2 ms {I3} (1974Ba88), 13.8 ms {I14} (1967Iv04), 14.5 ms {I10} (1976Ga33) and 15.5 ms {I20} (1966Me02). 
MOME2,MOMM1$from resonance cell laser spectroscopy (2007Ch07). 
MOMM1$other: +4.87 {I5} from NMR on oriented nuclei (1980Kl01). 
$|d<r{+2}>=+0.026 fm{+2} relative to ground state (2007Ch07). 
$configuration=|p1g{-9/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4 on 9/2+ target. C{+2}S equals the sum of J=6 and J=7 transition strengths; hence, it is concluded that the 712 observed in ({+3}He,d) is a doublet. 483.5|g to 5- indicates that the 715 level is the 6+ member. 
$configuration=|p1g{-9/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=1+2 on 0+ target, L(p,d)=1+2 on 1/2- target indicate an unresolved doublet of J|p=1-,2- and J|p=1+,2+,3+ levels. |g(|q) in {+88}Sr(p,n|g) uniquely indicates J=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=1 on 1/2- target. L({+3}He,p)=0 on 0+ target. C{+2}S(p,d) and C{+2}S(d,t) fit the (2J+1)-rule if J=0. 
$configuration=|p2p{-1/2} |n2p{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4 on 9/2+ target, M1 128|g to (6)+, 842.5|g to 4- 
$configuration=|p1g{-9/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4 on 9/2+ target. L({+3}He,p)=4 on 0+ target. C{+2}S({+3}He,d) fits the (2J+1)-rule if J=4. 
$configuration=|p1g{-9/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-,4-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Probably different from 1477 level since L(d,|a)=3 is in conflict to J|p=(9)+. 
J$L(d,|a)=3 on 0+ target. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4 on 9/2+ target. C{+2}S({+3}He,d) fits the (2J+1)-rule if J=(8,9). Since the 675 level is the 8+ member of the multiplet, the 1477 is the 9+. 
$configuration=|p1g{-9/2} |n1g{-9/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$(10+) from |g(|q) in {+87}Rb(|a,3n|g), (8+,10+) from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge({+18}O,3np|g),{+76}Ge({+18}O,p5n|g) with (8+) favored. (10+) is adopted tentatively. If J|p=(8+), the spins of the cascade ending on the 2444 level have to be lowered by two units. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(M1+E2) 214|g to (12-) and assumption of increasing spin with increasing excitation energy. Other: (14-) based on the 214|g to (12-) measured as (E2) in {+82}Se({+11}B,5n|g). See comment on 214|g in Adopted Gammas. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in 1974Fi18. Others: 13.8 ms {I14} (1967Iv04) and 14.5 ms {I7} (1962Mo19) both from |g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$assuming p{-3/2} transfer for the L=1 component. 
$d|s/d|W{-max}(d,t)=40 (1973Da10), d|s/d|W{-max}({+3}He,|a)=38 (1971Co20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$0.49 for p{-3/2} transfer 
$d|s/d|W{-max}(d,t)=360 (1973Da10), d|s/d|W{-max}({+3}He,|a)=280 (1971Co20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$0.9 for p{-3/2} transfer 
$d|s/d|W{-max}(d,t)=300 (1973Da10), d|s/d|W{-max}({+3}He,|a)=380 (1971Co20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$for p{-3/2} transfer 
$d|s/d|W{-max}(d,t)=450 (1973Da10), d|s/d|W{-max}({+3}He,|a)=660 (1971Co20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$From Adopted levels for {+88}Y in the ENSDF database 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_comment:
T$Based on comparison of the deuteron-|g time difference for the 373 keV, 232 keV and the 483 keV |g transitions which being indistinguishable up to a few nanoseconds implies an upper limit of a few nanoseconds for the half-life of this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-,1,2,3+
level_comment:
E$Authors state that this level could possibly be the same level at 1575.5 keV with an associated 868.7 reported tentative in 1974Ba06: Nucl.Phys. A218, 355 (1974) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$From Adopted levels for {+88}Y in the ENSDF database. Not listed in Table 1. Compilers have included this level as tentative based on text in 2016Hu02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4,5,6)-
level_comment:
E$Authors state that this level could possibly be the same level at 1881 keV {I5} reported in 1971Co20: Phys.Rev. C4, 803 (1971). Compilers note a misprint in the reference quoted by the authors: Ref [7] should be Ref [8] in 2016Hu02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4,5,6)-
level_comment:
E$Authors state that this level could possibly be the same level at 1913 keV {I5} reported in 1971Co20: Phys.Rev. C4, 803 (1971). Compilers note a misprint in the reference quoted by the authors: Ref [7] should be Ref [8] in 2016Hu02 
J$Compilers note inconsistency with statement provided by authors (2016Hu02) that J|p=(3,4,5,6)- similar to 1266 keV. The J|p at 1266 was given as (2,3,4)- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4,5,6)-
level_comment:
$J|p is given as (3,4,5)- in Table 1; J|p assignment given here is from Fig. 3 and text in 2016Hu02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Authors state that this level could possibly be the same level at 2056 keV {I5} reported in 1971Co20: Phys.Rev. C4, 803 (1971). Compilers note a misprint in the reference quoted by the authors: Ref [7] should be Ref [8] in 2016Hu02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4,5,6)-
level_comment:
E$Authors state that this level could possibly be the same level at 2305 keV {I5} reported in 1971Co20: Phys.Rev. C4, 803 (1971). Compilers note a misprint in the reference quoted by the authors: Ref [7] should be Ref [8] in 2016Hu02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$RMS charge radius: (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=4.2422 fm {I21} (2004An14 evaluation; and 2008 update available at http://cdfe.sinp.msu.ru) 
J$L=1 and Ay(|q) in (pol d,{+3}He). Optical spectroscopy measurements of 1950Ku69, 1949Cr17 and 1940Wi08 consistent with 1/2 
$Configuration=|pp{-1/2} 
MOMM1$NMR (1977Ha12). Others: -0.1374208 {I4} (1965Ba42), -0.13732 {I3} (1954Br09), 1950Ku69, 1949Cr17. 2007Ch07 used |m=-0.1374154 {I3} as a standard reference for measurements of magnetic moments in other Y nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+89m}Y - {+89g}Y)=+0.021 fm{+2} (2007Ch07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$laser spectroscopy using IGISOL facility at Jyvaskyla. Other: |m=+6.23 {I7} (1991Hi04,1996Oh03), NMR on oriented nuclei. g=1.385 {I16} (1991Hi04), sign from 1996Oh03. 
J$L=4 and Ay(|q) in (pol d,{+3}He) 
$Configuration=|pg{-9/2} 
T$from Itoh et al., Proceedings of Symposium on Nuclear Data, Tokai, JAERI, p185 (1994) as quoted by 2003Au02. Others: 16.06 s {I4} (1967Yu01), 1968Bo52, 1966Du07, 1962Br42, 1955Sw92, 1951Go42 
BE5|^=0.00056 {I5} (e,e'); |b{-5}=0.055 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L=1 and Ay(|q) in (pol d,{+3}He) 
$Configuration=|pp{-3/2} 
T$from (|g,|g') (1993Hu05). Other: 19 fs {I8} from (p,p'|g) 
B(E2)|^=0.0097 {I11} (e,e'); |b{-2}=0.079 {I13} (n,n'); 0.060 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L=3 and Ay(|q) in (pol d,{+3}He) 
T$from B(E2)|^. Others: 0.62 ps {I14} from DSA in (|a,2n|g), 0.9 ps {I8} (p,p'|g) 
$Configuration=|pf{-5/2} 
B(E2)|^=0.0164 {I15} (e,e'). |b{-2}=0.079 {I10} (n,n'); 0.072 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1 |g to 3/2-, |g to 9/2+ and L(p,p')=3 from 1/2- 
T$other: 0.35 ps {I14} (p,p'|g) 
B(E3)|^=0.0258 {I23} (e,e'). |b{-3}=0.160 {I17} (n,n'); 0.156 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=L(e,e')=3 from 1/2-; log| {Ift}=7.5 from 9/2+ 
T$from (p,p'|g) 
B(E3)|^=0.037 {I3} (e,e'). |b{-3}=0.14 {I3} (n,n'); 0.146 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=4; L(p,p')=5 from 1/2- 
T$from (|a,2n|g) (1992Fu04). Other: 0.12 ps {I6} (p,p'|g) (1973BeYD) 
|b{-5}=0.047 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=L(n,n')=2 from 1/2-; L({+3}He,d)=1+4 
T$from (|g,|g') (1993Hu05) 
|b{-2}=0.087 {I16} (n,n'); 0.066 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(e,e')=L(p,p')=2 from 1/2-; excitation function in (n,n'|g) 
T$from B(E2)|^(e,e'). Other: 0.10 ps {I+13-4} from (|g,|g') (1993Hu05) 
B(E2)|^(e,e')=0.0145 {I12} 
|b{-2}=0.065 {I8} (n,n'); 0.046 (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)
level_comment:
E$there may be a second level near this energy (at 4236.2) as proposed in (n,n'|g) from the observation of a tentative 3326.2|g 
J$|g to 9/2+; excitation function in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, (E1) |g to 17/2-; |DJ=1, (M1+E2) |g to 17/2+ 
T$recoil-distance method in ({+18}O,xnp|g), not corrected for side feeding thus should be considered as upper limit 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2,5/2-
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=0+2 for a 6480 group suggests a doublet with J|p=1/2+ for one and 3/2+,5/2+ for the other 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from Itoh et al., Proceedings of Symposium on Nuclear Data, Tokai, JAERI, p185 (1994) as quoted in 2003Au02 compilation. Others: 15.28 s {I17} (1998Do17), 16.06 s {I4} (1967Yu01), 1968Bo52, 1966Du07, 1962Br42, 1955Sw92, 1951Go42 
g factor from 1991Hi04, sign from 1996Oh03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
From 1978Da13 only. Population of this level in (|a,2n|g) is considered (evaluator) uncertain since 3107|g with I|g=25 (1978Da13) should have been detected in other studies, either as a double escape or as a full energy peak 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=4999 {I15} 
|G{-|g}(to 1507)=8 eV {I2} (1972PaYW). |G{-|g}(1745)=3.5 eV {I10} (1972PaYW), 4 eV {I3} (1969Ri08). |G{-|g}(to g.s.)=7 eV {I2} (1969Ri08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=5993 {I15} 
WIDTHG0 Weighted average of 18 eV {I3} (1972PaYW) and 11 eV {I4} determined from (2J+1)|*' |G{-p}|*' |G{-|g0}/|G=14 eV {I5} (1968Sh03), with |G, |G{-p} taken from 1968Co02 in (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=6983 {I15} 
WIDTHG0 Determined from (2J+1)|*' |G{-p}|*' |G{-|g0}/|G=17 eV {I6} (1968Sh03), with |G, |G{-p} taken from 1968Co02 in (p,p'). The 6914 and the 6983 resonances are not resolved, and from J|p and RUL it is concluded that a contribution from the 6914 resonance is negligible 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=7415 {I15} 
WIDTHG0 Weighted average of 11 eV {I2} (1972PaYW) and 14 eV {I5} determined from (2J+1)|*' |G{-p}|*' |G{-|g0}/|G=17 eV {I6} (1968Sh03), with |G, |G{-p} taken from 1968Co02 in (p,p') 
|G{-|g}(to 1745 level)|<2 eV (1972PaYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}=23.9 fs +25-21 (1993Hu05). Other: 20.4 fs {I13} (1972ArZD) 
$g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.0381 eV {I21} (from T{-1/2} in 1993Hu05), 0.052 eV {I17} (1968Al13). |G{-0}=0.0191 eV {I10} (1993Hu05), 0.0223 eV {I14} (1972ArZD), 0.028 eV {I8} (1968Al13) 
S$others: 98 {I12} (1997Re13), 65 {I4} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}=19.9 fs {I+21-19} (1993Hu05). 
g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.0423 eV {I26}. |G{-0}=0.0220 eV {I13} from T{-1/2} and branching(2882|g)=96% in 1993Hu05 
S$others: 31 {I4} (1997Re13), 19.6 {I12} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}=45.0 fs {I+15-11} (1993Hu05). 
g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.020 eV. |G{-0}=0.0110 eV {I23} from T{-1/2} in 1993Hu05 and branching(3067|g)=91% from Adopted Gammas 
S$other: 12 {I2} (1997Re13), 8.2 {I17} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}=0.10 ps {I+13-4} (1993Hu05). 
g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.010 eV {I6}. |G{-0}=0.0040 eV {I22} from T{-1/2} in 1993Hu05 and branching(3107|g)=83% from Adopted Gammas. Branching(3107)=87% (1993Hu05) 
S$other: 5.8 {I9} (1997Re13), 4.0 {I22} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}=0.11 ps {I+7-3} (1993Hu05). 
g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.0074 eV {I28}. |G{-0}=0.0032 eV {I12} from T{-1/2} in 1993Hu05 and branching(3139|g)=78% from 1993Hu05 
S$others: 4.5 {I8} (1997Re13), 2.9 {I11} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.093 eV {I10}. |G{-0}=0.048 eV {I6} from T{-1/2} in 1993Hu05 for J=3/2 and branching=95% from Adopted Gammas 
$T{-1/2}=9.3 fs +11-10 (1993Hu05) for J=3/2 and branching(3992|g)=95% (1993Hu05). T{-1/2}=12.6 fs {I+16-13} for J=5/2 
S$others: 28 {I4} (1997Re13), 22.4 {I25} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
g|G{+2}{-0}/|G=0.115 eV {I14}. |G{-0}=0.038 eV {I5} from T{-1/2} in 1993Hu05 for J=5/2 and branching(4170|g)=100% from Adopted Gammas 
$T{-1/2}=10.1 fs {I+15-11} (1993Hu05) for J=5/2. T{-1/2}=7.5 fs {I+10-8} (for J=3/2) 
S$others: 24 {I3} (1997Re13), 26 {I3} (1993Hu05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
E$1997Re13 report a level at 5792.3 {I5}, probably represents 5789+ 5796 in 2009Be03 
T$other: 0.13 eV {I3} for a 5792 level (1997Re13) 
S$other: 15 {I3} (1997Re13) for a 5792 level in 2009Be03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=4999 {I15} 
T$from 1973Gr08. Others: 16 keV (1968Co02), 19 keV (1971Kr21), 12 keV (1969Wi15), 20 keV (1970Co11) 
WIDTHP$from 1973Gr08. Others: 8 keV (1968Co02), 6.3 keV (1971Kr21), 4 keV (1969Wi15) 
E(p)(lab)=5056 (1968Co02,1970Co11,1975Ra18), 5070 (1974Cu04, 1973Gr08,1971Kr21), 5090 (1969Wi15), 5080 (1964Fo03) 
IAR of {+89}Sr g.s., 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=5993 {I15} 
E(p)(lab)=6062 (1968Co02,1970Co11,1975Ra18), 6100 (1968Sh03), 6065 (1975Ge14) 
IAR of 1032, 1/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=6914 {I15} 
|G=32 keV (1970Co11) 
WIDTHP$from 1973Gr08. Others: 11 keV (1968Co02), 5 keV (1969Wi15), 32 keV (1970Co11) 
|G{-|g}(7000+7070)=7 eV {I3} (1968Sh03) 
E(p)(lab)=6993 (1968Co02,1970Co11), 7000 (1972Bo40,1968Sh03, 1976Ha47), 7010 (1969Wi15), 6987 (1975Ra18) 
IAR of 1940, 5/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=6983 {I15} 
|G=57 keV (1970Co11) 
WIDTHP$from 1973Gr08. Others: 23 keV (1968Co02), 28 keV (1969Wi15), 57 keV (1970Co11) 
|G{-|g}(7000+7070)=7 eV {I3} (1968Sh03) 
E(p)(lab)=7063 (1968Co02,1970Co11,1975Ra18), 7070 (1968Sh03), 7080 (1972Bo40,1976Ha47), 7090 (1969Wi15) 
IAR of 2008, 3/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=7415 {I15} 
T$others: 60 keV (1968Co02), 70 keV (1969Wi15), 68 keV (1970Co11) 
WIDTHP$from 1973Gr08. Others: 18 keV (1968Co02), 22 keV (1969Wi15) 
E(p)(lab)=7500 (1968Co02,1970Co11), 7510 (1968Sh03), 7530 (1972Bo40,1969Wi15,1976Ha47) 
IAR of 2451, 3/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=7578 {I15} 
|G=20 keV (1973Sl01), 26 keV (1970Co11) 
E(p)(lab)=7660 (1970Co11), 7650 (1973Sl01) 
IAR of 2570, (3/2)- in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=7704 {I15} 
|G=20 keV, |G{-p}=4 keV (1969Wi15) 
E(p)(lab)=7790 (1970Co11), 7800 (1973Sl01), 7810 (1969Wi15) 
IAR of 2675, 7/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=7835 {I15} 
|G=30 keV (1973Sl01,1970Co11) 
E(p)(lab)=7892 (1968Co02), 7920 (1970Co11,1973Sl01) 
IAR of 2805, (7/2-,5/2+) in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=8099 {I15} 
|G=70 keV (1969Wi15), 40 keV (1968Co02), 66 keV (1970Co11) 
|G{-p}=7 keV (1969Wi15), 5.6 keV (1968Co02) 
E(p)(lab)=8192 (1968Co02,1970Co11), 8210 (1969Wi15) 
IAR of 3128, 3/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=8216 {I15} 
|G=40 keV (1969Wi15), 50 keV (1968Co02), 57 keV (1970Co11) 
|G{-p}=1.5 keV (1969Wi15), 3.0 keV (1968Co02) 
E(p)(lab)=8310 (1968Co02,1969Wi15), 8330 (1970Co11) 
IAR of 3249, 5/2+ in {+89}Sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(c.m.)=8710 {I15} 
T$from 1973Sl01. Other: 15 keV (1970Co11) 
E(p)(lab)=8810 (1970Co11), 8780 (1973Sl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1967Be69. E=16800 {I300} (1984Va29), 16700 {I50} (1971Le28), 16700 (1975Sh04) 
|G(total)=4.0 MeV {I3} (1984Va29), 4.1 MeV {I1} (1971Le28), 3.95 MeV {I6} (1967Be69) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ measured binding energy=23.11 MeV {I11} (2001Ho30), 22.0 MeV {I5} (1996Ha05), 22.1 MeV {I16} (1991Pi07) 
$ L=0, s orbit, d|s/d|W=0.60 |mb {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
L$L=3, S=1 admixture is indicated by (pol p,p') data (1985Pl02) and other microscopic (1982Me02,1978In03) analyses of this state 
S$|b{-5}. Others: 0.045 (1969Sc25), 0.060 (1968Be54), 0.07 (1967Aw02). At E(p)=185 MeV, |b{-5}=0.042 or 0.034 (1978In03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
L$L=0, S=1 strong component is indicated by (pol p,p') data (1985Pl02) and other microscopic (1982Me02,1978In03) analyses of this state 
S$|b{-2}. Others: 0.051 (1969Sc25), 0.064 (1968Be54), 0.08 (1967Aw02), 0.072 (1967St13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
L$no evidence is found for S=1 admixture in (pol p,p') data (1985Pl02) and other microscopic (1982Me02,1978In03) analyses of this state 
|b{-2}=0.058 (1969Sc25), 0.066 (1968Be54), 0.08 (1967Aw02), 0.067 (1967St13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$tentatively identified (1975Hu11) as a (13/2+) state arising from coupling of a p{-1/2} proton to |pg{-9/2}|pp{-3/2}{+-1}. 
1982Me02 QUOTE L=(4) AND B4'=0.022 FROM 1973HuZU, BUT THESE VALUES DO NOT APPEAR IN 1975Hu11 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
S$1.91 (1968Pr02). S=1.14 (1967Ka15). Reanalyzed S=0.60 (quoted by 2001Kr01 from a priv comm from one of the authors of 1980St28) 
2p{-1/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
S$1.10 (1968Pr02). S=0.51 (1967Ka15). Reanalyzed S=0.30 (quoted by 2001Kr01 from a priv comm from one of the authors of 1980St28) 
1g{-9/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
S$4.25 (1968Pr02). S=2.2 (1967Ka15). Reanalyzed S=1.20 (quoted by 2001Kr01 from a priv comm from one of the authors of 1980St28) 
2p{-3/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
S$7.80 (1968Pr02), S=2.0 (1967Ka15). Reanalyzed S=2.40 (quoted by 2001Kr01 from a priv comm from one of the authors of 1980St28) 
1f{-5/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$giant resonance-like structure dominated by 1f7/2 transfer with some contribution from lower L values as suggested by small angle behavior of |s(|q) (1980St28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$a weak and wide structure consistent with L=(0) reported by 1984Se21 and tentatively interpreted as due to 2s{-1/2} hole state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$2620 (1978Gu17) 
J$|s(|q) possibly consistent with DWBA for J|p=9/2+ (for 2622 level in Adopted Levels) (1975Pe02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$2870 (1978Gu17) 
J$|s(|q) does not fit DWBA expected for J|p=(7/2)+ (for 2871 level in Adopted Levels) (1975Pe02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$|s/|s(DWBA)=0.012 
E$3070 (1978Gu17) 
J$|s(|q) does not fit DWBA expected for adopted J|p=(5/2)- (for 3107 or 3139 levels in Adopted Levels) (1975Pe02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J$11/2- in level-scheme Fig. 1 of 2016Li34 is a misprint 
$Configuration=|p[(1f{-5/2}2p{-3/2}){+9}(2p{-1/2}1g{-9/2})] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$J from atomic beam (1978Fu06); |p from L=2 in (d,p) and (|a,{+3}He); L=1 in (t,|a) and (d,{+3}He). 
T$weighted average (using the limitation of relative statistical weights method (1988WoZO)) of 64.053 h {I20} (2004Ko18), 63.46 h {I13} (1969Gr38), 64.6 h {I8} (1967Bi02), 64.21 h {I8} (1968La10), 64.06 h {I11} (1966Ri01), 63.74 h {I10 }(1963Vo02), 64.8 h {I2} (1956He77), and 64.24 h {I30} (1955Vo03). 
MOMM1$from atomic beam measurement (1962Pe01) 
MOME2$from 2016St14 evaluation based on 2008Py02 and 1998Bi20. Other: -0.155 {I3} (1962Pe01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (d,p) and (|a,{+3}He); L=1 in (t,|a) and (d,{+3}He). |g|g(|q) in {+90}Y IT decay (3.19 h). 
T$from delayed coin in {+90}Y IT decay (3.19 h). 
MOMM1$from integral perturbed angular correlations (IPAC) (1974Kl06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$L=4 in (t,|a) and (d,{+3}He); 479|g E5 to 2-. 
T$weighted average (using the limitation of relative statistical weights method) of: 3.244 h {I5} (1992An19), 3.19 h {I1} (1967Gr02), 3.15 h {I5} (1962Ab03), 3.2 h {I1} (1961Ca12), 3.14 h {I10} (1961He09), and 3.19 h {I6} (1961Ha17). The uncertainty has been increased to include the most precise value of 3.244 h {I5} (1992An19). 
MOMM1$from Colinear Laser Spectroscopy (CLS) (2007Ch07); other: +5.1 {I5} from low temperature nuclear orientation of 480 kev transition (1988Be46) 
MOME2$from Colinear Laser Spectroscopy (CLS) (2007Ch07,2016St14) 
%B-$from measured I(2319|g)/I(480|g); see {+90}Y |b{+-} decay (3.19 h). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$L=4 in (t,|a) and (d,{+3}He); circular polarization of primary |g ray to this level in (n,|g); 776|g E1+M2 to 2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
J$tentative assignment from (n,|g); supported by L=4 transfer in (t,|a) and (d,{+3}He) reaction; 365.2|g to 7+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_comment:
J$L=0 in (d,p). S-factor(1211)/S-factor(1371)=2.9 {I1} agrees with 3.0 (theory) for J|p(1211)=0- and J|p(1371)=1-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) and lin pol in ({+18}O,np|g) and ({+18}O,3np|g); 238|g M1+E2 to 8+. 
E$the ordering of 239|g and 642|g may be reversed, which would result in a level at 2859.0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (d,p). S-factor(2476)/S-factor(2624)=1.96 {I10} agrees with 1.67 (theory) for J|p(2475)=2- and J|p(2624)=1-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$since the reversed ordering of the 538.7-527.2 cascade is not ruled out, this level is either at 7882.9 or 7894.4 
T$from DSA measurement in {+82}Se({+11}B,3n|g) 
J$D 527.2|g to (14+); band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (16+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSA measurement in {+82}Se({+11}B,3n|g) 
J$D 538.7|g to (15+), 1065.8|g to (14+); band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
E,T$from the Adopted Levels 
%B-$from measured I|g(2319|g)/I|g(479.5|g)=1.89|*10{+-5} {I18} (1976Gr16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$since the reversed ordering of the 538.7-527.2 cascade is not ruled out, this level is either at 7882.9 or 7894.4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.176 h {I12} (stat) {I6} (syst) from 202|g(t) and 3.180 h {I15} (stat) {I6} (syst) from 479|g(t) (2020Kr06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from 202.5|g(t) and 479.5|g(t) (2014Li50), weighted average of 3 measurements for each transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J J=1/2 from atomic beam (1962Pe21); L(t,p)=0 on 1/2- target. 
T from 1971Ba28. Other measurements: 58.8 d {I2} (1963Ho15), 59.1 d 2 (1961Wy01), 58.3 d {I8} (1956He77), 57.5 d {I5} (1955Ka12), and 58.5 d 10 (1954Bu38). 
MOMM1 From atomic beam magnetic resonance (1989Ra17 and 2011StZZ, from 1962Pe21); relative to {+89}Y. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J L(t,|a)=4; M4 transition to 1/2-. 
T from 1969Kn01. Other measurement: 50.30 min {I25} (1953Am08). 
MOMM1 From NMR on oriented nuclei (2011StZZ from 1991Be18), assuming the hyperfine field for Y in Fe is -30.67 T 18. Other |m: 6.01 {I+31-15} (1991Be18) and 5.96 {I6} (1992Be50) arising from different assumed values for the latter field. Additionally, |m({+87}Y, 381)/|m=1.016 {I1} (1992Be50). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
J M1,E2 750|g to 9/2+ 556; 652|g to 3/2- 653; J|p(p,|a)=(5/2+). 1305|g feeds 1/2- g.s., but it is a very weak branch. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-,9/2-
level_comment:
J L(t,p)=4 on 1/2- target. 
Probably differs from 1552 level seen in (t,|a). Otherwise, L(t,|a)=3 and L(t,p)=4 on 1/2- target would determine J|p=7/2-; such a state would exhaust 50% of the f{-7/2} proton hole strength, in contradiction to shell-model systematics (1975Pr04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J 3/2-, 5/2- from L(t,p)=2 on 1/2- target; (5/2-) from (p,|a). L(t,|a)=(3), inconsistent with L(d,{+3}He)=(1). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J L(t,|a)=3. L(t,p)=2 on 1/2- target. However, 1651|g to 9/2+; transfer reactions and decay may populate two different levels at this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2,25/2+)
level_comment:
J (23/2) proposed in ({+24}Mg,X|g), (25/2+) in ({+82}Se,p2n|g. 619|g to (21/2+) 3528 and 579|g to (19/2,21/2) 3568; 334|g-619|g cascade from (25/2+) 4481 through this level to (21/2+) 3528 level cannot be stretched Q - Q (see comment on J(4481)) but, for either, ADO and DCO in ({+82}Se,p2n|g) favor |DJ=0,2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
J 954|g to (21/2+) 3528 in ({+82}Se,p2n|g). |DJ=(0,2) 334|g to 4147. (25/2+) is supported in ({+24}Mg,X|g), where 954-keV crossover |g eliminates the possibility that each of the 334|g and the 619|g in that cascade to (21/2+) 3528 is |DJ=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%IT: |b{+-} decay searched for, but not observed (1953Am08). 1953Am08 conclude %|b{+-} does not exceed 1.5%. 
T From 1969Kn01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L L(d,{+3}He)=(1); L(t,|a)=(3), based on fewer data points, but consistent with Adopted Levels, Gammas. 
C{+2}S(t,|a)=0.65 if L=3. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+92}Y,{+89}Y)=+0.385 fm{+2} (2007Ch07). 
|m, Q: from LASER spectroscopy. |m: relative to |m({+89}Y)=-0.1374154 {I3} (1977Ha12). 
T from 1966No08. Others: 3.53 h {I2} (1960Fr05), 3.50 h {I5} (1962Bu16) 
J the |b{+-} spectrum in the log| {If{+1u}t}=9.24 decay to the 0+ g.s. of {+92}Zr has first-forbidden unique shape (1962Bu16). J=2 confirmed in LASER spectroscopy (2007Ch07, 2006Ca38). 
Configuration=((|p 2p{-1/2}){+1}((|n 2d{-5/2}){+3}5/2)) (see, {Ie.g.}, 1974Su06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J possibly 6+ based on shell-model calculations (2007Bu35). 
T from time correlations between implanted {+92}Y nuclei and |g-ray events in {+92}Y IT decay (2009Fo05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (J+5)
level_comment:
E,J Q 1023|g to (J+3) 1282+x. However, alternative values of E=2308.0+x, spin=J+4 are possible because order of 1023|g and 1027|g has not been established. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
J tentative J|p of 6+ is supported by shell-model calculations. 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+93}Y,{+89}Y)=+0.526 (2007Ch07). 
J |DJ=2, yes shape for |b spectrum for decay to {+93}Zr g.s. (1959Kn38). L(d,{+3}He)=1 determines J|p=1/2-,3/2-. J|p({+93}Zr)=3/2+,5/2+ from L(p,|a)=2. Hence, J|p({+93}Y)=1/2-, J|p({+93}Zr)=5/2+. 
|m: from g=-0.2780 {I17} (2004Ni21; NMRON, if hyperfine field for y in Fe is -29.4 {I2} tesla). Other: -0.12 {I3} from LASER spectroscopy (2007Ch07; see also 2006Ca38). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 1/2-,3/2- from L(d,{+3}He)=1; shell-model calculations (2007Bu35) cannot account for two low-lying 1/2- states. J=3/2 for analogous states in {+95}Y and {+91}Y. 
T from {+93}Y |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>(759 level, g.s.)=+0.064 (2007Ch07). 
|m,Q: from LASER spectroscopy (2007Ch07). See also 2006Ca38. 
J L(d,{+3}He)=4; E3 168|g to (3/2)- 590; J=9/2 analogous to {+95}Y, {+91}Y. However, |s(|q) is not well fitted by 9/2+ DWBA prediction in (p,|a) and apparent I|b to this level from 5/2+ in |b{+-} decay favor J=7/2, contrary to the results of shell-model calculations which predict a low-lying 9/2+ state but no 7/2+ state (2007Bu35). 
T from {+93}Y IT decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J L(d,{+3}He)=3; RUL requires T{-1/2}>39 |ms if the 876|g feeding the 1/2- g.s. has M3 multipolarity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
J suggested in {+238}U({+82}Se,X|g) based on comparison with shell-model calculations (2007Bu35) and Q 792|g to (9/2)+ 759 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E may include the 3825 level of 1977Bi01; however, only the 1972|g placed from that level is weak enough to be consistent with the |b{+-} feeding deduced in 1997Gr09. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$log| {If{+1u}t}=8.9 to 0+. Spectrum has unique-forbidden shape (1971Ca34). 
T$from 18.6 min {i2} (1976Si11), and 18.7 min {i1} (1971Ca34). These two values are measured by following the 919 |g in {+94}Zr. Other T{-1/2} deduced from integral |g or |b measurements: 16.3 min {i2} (1974Gr29), 19.7 min {i5} (1973Si43), 19.4 min {i5} (1972Eh02), 18.7 min {i2} (1971Ca34), 19.9 min {i5} (1966No08), 20.35 min {i20} (1961Fr03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$from analysis of IAS decay in ({+3}He,|ap). Also 1974Gi09 deduce (3-) by comparison of (d,|a) angular distribution with the 3- state at 200 keV in {+90}Y. In conflict with this assignment, 1974Su06 give L(d,|a)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$from possible (E3) |g to 2- and (M2) |g to (3-) compatible with shell model calculations and comparison with nearby nuclei 
T$from {+94}Y IT decay (1999Ge01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 10.3 min {i1} (1966La17, |g's; scin), 10.9 min {i2} (1961Fr03, |b's; NaI), 10.7 min {i2} (1967Va03, |b's; scin), 10.3 min {i2} (1973Ca26,954|g; Ge(Li)), and 10.2 min {i1} (1974Gr29. 4|p|b; scin). 
MOMM1$using continuous beam laser spectroscopy (CBLS) technique (2007Ch07) 
$|D<r{+2}>(95,89)=+0.723 fm{+2}, deduced from isotope shift (2007Ch07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$969|g(t) (2009Ur02); the authors also quote 14.9 ns {i5} in "summary" section as half-life determined in {+248}Cm SF decay, but in the text half-life from this SF decay is listed as 16 ns {i3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) for 1145.3-461.5-171.8 |g cascade and 682.3+1246.3 summed |g; weighted average of 71 ns {i6} and 62 ns {i4}, respectively (2009Ur02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 51.2 |ms {I9} (2009Ur02), 58 |ms {i8} (1982Pr01), 56.8 |ms {i20} (1976SeZN), 60 |ms {i5} (1976MoZJ), and 54.0 |ms {i25} (1969Wa29), from |g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$122.3|g is M1. |g|g(|q) of 809.4-122.3 cascade excludes J=1. |g|g(|q) is in conflict with |d from |a(K)exp if 122.3|g is E1+M2 
T$from 1990Ma03. Others: 5.4 s {i1} (1988Ma01); also 6.3 s {i2} (1979En02), 6.0 s {i3} (1975Sa15), and 6.0 s {i4} (1975Kh05) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+96}Y,{+89}Y)=+0.82 {I8} (syst uncertainty, 2007Ch07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$809.4|g from 931.7, 1+ level is E1. |g|g(|q) of 809.4-122.3 cascade excludes 1-2-1 sequence 
T$from 1989Ma38. Other: 260 ps {i40} (1987Oh05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$from 1989Ma38. Other: |<139 ps (1988Br08) 
J$279.4|g from 931.7, 1+ level is E1+M2. J=0 excluded by |g to 0- g.s. |g|g(|q) of the 279.4-530.0, 530.0-122.3, 279.4-(530.0)-122.3 cascades and |a(K)exp(279.4) are internally consistent only if J=2 and not if J=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (2007Ch07) and log| {Ift}=4.7 to 8+, no |b to 6+. 
T$average of 10.0 s {i3} (1975Sa15), 9.6 s {i3} (1975Kl11), 9.6 s {i3} (1975Ba36), and 9.3 s {i3} (1974GrZN) 
E$from end point beta minus energy difference between ground state and isomer as calculated by 2003Au02. 
$|D<r{+2}>({+96}Y,{+96}Y(g.s.))=+0.102 {I10} (syst uncertainty, 2007Ch07) 
$|m,Q from laser spectroscopy (2007Ch07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E,J,T$from {+96}Y Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database. 
$In the present work, no transitions were found, which could feed this isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5,6-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Is03 using fast-timing |g|g|g(t) method, with a double gate on the 122 and 731 keV |g rays 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$1+,2+ in {+96}Y Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database. 2018Wa19 state that 2+ is preferred from M1(+E2) multipolarity of 213.2-keV transition from 931.7, 1+ level; multipolarity assignment of 213.2|g from {+96}Y Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from shell model 
T$weighted average of 3.5 {I2} s (1987PfZX), 3.76 {I2} s (1986Wa17), 3.6 {I4} s (1982Ga24), 3.1 {I2} s (1981En05), 3.6 {I3} s (1976KaYO), 3.70 {I10} s (1976MoZC). Others: 3.72 {I11} s (1983Re10, earlier report by 1986Wa17), 3.3 {I2} s (1979En02, earlier report by 1981En05), 3.7 s (1978St02). 
%B-N$weighted average of 0.054 {I4} (1986Wa17), 0.06 {I1} (1981En05). Others: 0.061 {I7} (1983Re10, earlier report by 1986Wa17), 0.006 {I1} (1982Ga24) 
MOMM1$measured by LASER spectroscopy (2007Ch07,2006Ca38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$configuration=(|p 1g{-9/2}) expected from shell model. log| {Ift}=5.1 to 7/2+ 1264-keV level in {+97}Zr 
T$weighted average of 1.18 {I4} s (1986Wa17), 1.5 {I3} (1976KaYO), 1.21 {I3} s (1976MoZC), 1.11 {I3} s (1970Ei02). Other 1.19 {I4} s (1983Re10, earlier report by 1986Wa17), 1.2 s (1978St02). 
%B-,%IT$from {+97}Y IT decay (1.17 s) (1976MoZC) 
%B-N$from 1986Wa17. Other: 0.11 {I3} (1983Re10, earlier report by 1986Wa17) 
MOMM1,MOME2$measured by LASER spectroscopy (2007Ch07,2007Bi14,2006Ca38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.9 {I2} from 1/2+ {+97}Sr; (E1) |g from 1/2+,3/2+ 2211.92-keV level; |g to (5/2+) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to (21/2+) level; no |g's to levels with J<21/2. 
T$weighted average of 138 {I15} ms (1987Bo19) and 144 {I10} ms (1986Lh01) in {+97}Y IT decay (142 ms) 
%IT,%B-$from {+97}Y IT decay (142 ms) 
MOMM1,MOME2$measured by LASER spectroscopy (2007Ch07,2007Bi14,2006Ca38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
T$1990Bu01 give T{-1/2}<0.2 ps measured by centroid shift method. However, this T{-1/2} gives B(E1)(W.u.)>0.014 for the [E1] 480.0 |g which is higher than the limit set by RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$9/2+ in 1986Lh01 
T$from adopted levels 
%B-,%IT,%B-N$from adopted levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
Also contains configuration=((|p 1g9/2)((|n 2d5/2,-1)(|n 1g7/2))6+), considering the E3 transition from (27/2-) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 138 {I15} ms (1987Bo19) and 144 {I10} ms (1986Lh01) 
%IT,%B-$from comparison of coin intensity of 699|g, 818|g, 840|g ({+97}Y |b{+-} (142 ms)) with intensities of 792|g, 911|g, 321|g, 669|g, and 990|g ({+97}Y IT decay (142 ms)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius=4.371 fm {I13} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+89}Y,{+98}Y)=+1.110 fm{+2} {I1} (2013An02) 
J$single peak seen in hyperfine structure using collinear laser spectroscopy at IGISOL facility, JYFL (2010Ba31,2007Ch07). J=0 is also also consistent with (428|g)(119|g)(|q) in {+98}Sr |b{+-} decay (1989BeZG,1988MaYY); and |g|g(|q) data in SF decay (2017Ur03). Parity is from E1-M1 cascade of 428|g-119|g from 1+. Calculations (1989Br31) based on IBFFM model suggest configuration=|pp{-1/2}~#|ns{-1/2} 
T$weighted average of 0.550 s {I30} (1987PfZX, earlier value of 0.655 s {I50} in 1982Ga24); 0.548 s {I1} (1986ReZU, earlier values of 0.548 s {I2} in 1986Wa17, and 0.51 s {I1} in 1983Re10); and 0.65 s {I6} (1977Si05, earlier value of 0.60 s {I5} in 1975Kh05). Uncertainty inflated by evaluators from 0.001 s to 0.002 s. Others: 0.6 s (1978St02), <0.3 s (1971Tr02) 
%B-N$weighted averaged of 0.35 {I2} (1993Ru01), 0.3 {I1} (1987PfZX,1982Ga24), and 0.23 {I5} (1986ReZU, earlier values of 0.24 {I1} in 1986Wa17 and 0.21 {I4} in 1983Re10). 
$|d<r{+2}>(relative to {+89}Y)=+1.088 fm{+2} (collinear laser spectroscopy, 2007Ch07) 
$Evaluations: 1993Ru01, 1984Ma39 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$113.4|g M1 to 0-; spin=1 also from |g|g(|q) in SF decay (2017Ur03). Calculations (1989Br31) based on IBFFM model suggest configuration=|pp{-1/2}~#|ns{-1/2}. log {Ift}=5.2 from 0+ is inconsistent (see comments in {+98}Sr |b{+-} decay) 
T$from |g(t) in {+98}Sr |b{+-} decay (1987Oh05). Other: |?11 ns (1979ScZV) (|b|g(t) in {+98}Sr |b{+-} decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$170.8|g E2 to 0-, 51.5|g M1+E2 to 1- 
T$from (171|g)|g(t); weighted average of 0.64 |ms {I2} (2017Ur03 in {+235}U(n,F|g):delayed |g); 0.61 |ms {I1} (2013RuZX, {+235}U(n,F|g), {+241}Pu(n,F|g); uncertainty of 0.02 |ms used in averaging); and 0.62 |ms {I8} (1972GrYM and 1970Gr38 in {+235}U(n,F|g)). Others: 0.62 |ms (1979ScZV in {+98}Sr decay), 0.62 |ms (1970Jo20 in {+235}U(n,F|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$204.3|g E2 to 2-; (121|g)(204|g)(|q) in SF decay (2017Ur03) supports J=4 for 375 level 
T$from |g|g(t). Weighted average of 35.0 ns {I5} (2017Ur03 in SF decay), and 35.8 ns {I8} (2002PfZZ,2004Br14 in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$49.9|g E1 from 496, (4)- level, 275.2|g to 2- 
T$|g|g(t) (2002PfZZ,2004Br14 in {+235}U(n,F|g),{+241}Pu(n,F|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+,6+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E$from mass measurement (2017Ur03) 
J$evidence of |b{+-} feeding with log| {Ift}=6.4 to 4+ and 5- levels, and no |b{+-} feeding to 2+ levels (see {+98}Y |b{+-} (2.32 s)). 1994St31 suggest J|p=5+ with configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ns{-1/2}, but 4- is suggested (1995HaZT) with configuration=|p2p{-1/2}~#|n1g{-7/2}. 2007Ch07 observed hyperfine structure with a minimum of four peaks in the spectrum, but could not assign a definite spin from these data. 2017Ur03 propose 7+ or 6+ with a preference for the former, based on decay pattern and shell-model considerations, and possible contribution from 9/2[404] neutron extruder orbital in its configuration 
T$weighted average of 2.36 s {I6} (2017Ur03), 2.1 s {I3} (1981En05), and 2.0 s {I2} (1977Si05) 
$No IT decay has been observed: %IT/%|b{+-}<0.25 (1977Si05) suggests %IT<20%. Other: 1991AyZZ 
$%|b{+-}n evaluations: 3.1 {I28} (1984Ma39), 3.6 {I22} (1975Iz03) 
$|m=+2.98 {I2} for J=4, +3.11 {I2} for J=5 (collinear laser spectroscopy, 2007Ch07, 2014StZZ); values are relative to those of {+89}Y. 
$Q=+1.73 {I19} for J=4, +1.80 {I20} for J=5 (collinear laser spectroscopy, 2007Ch07, 2016St14); values are relative to those of {+89}Y. 
$2007Bi14 for |m and Q corrected to 2007Ch07 (B. Singh, Feb 11, 2021) 
$|d<r{+2}>(relative to {+89}Y)=+0.863 fm{+2} for J=4, +0.860 fm {+2} for J=5 (collinear laser spectroscopy,2007Ch07); deduced (2007Ch07) |b{-2}=+0.33 {I3} for J=4, +0.31 {I3} for J=5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$121.2|g M1+E2 to 4-, 325.2|g to 2-; possible bandhead with configuration=|p1/2[303]~#|n9/2[404] (1987Ma58) 
T$from |g(t). Weighted average of 6.95 |ms {I6} (2017Ur03 in {+235}U(n,F|g):delayed |g), and 6.87 |ms {I5} (2013RuZX in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g)). Others from {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g): 7.2 |ms {I1} (1999Ge01), 8.0 |ms {I2} (1972GrYM,1970Gr38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$log {Ift}=4.9 (allowed |b transition) from 0+; 428.6|g E1 to 1-, 547.9|g to 0-. Possible configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ng{-7/2} (1989Br31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$36.2|g E1 from 1+, 564.0|g to 0-; |g|g(|q) in SF decay (2017Ur03) 
T$|b|g(t) in {+98}Sr |b{+-} decay (2004Br14). Other: |?4 ns (1979ScZV in {+98}Sr |b{+-}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M4
level_comment:
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
T$from decay curve for prompt lines above the 564+x level gated at 444.7-keV line below the isomer in SF data (2017Ur03). Other: 160 ns {I40} from SF data (2017Ur03) 
$Interpreted by 2017Ur03 as deformed state with a band built on it, as shown in authors' level-scheme Fig. 2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$100.6|g M1(+E2) to (4)-; possible band member 
T$from 2017Is03 in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g), presumably from fast-timing |g|g(t) method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$log {Ift}=4.4 (allowed |b transition) from 0+ 
T$|b|g(t) in {+98}Sr |b{+-} (2004Br14). Other: 9 ns (1979ScZV, |g|g(t) in {+98}Sr |b{+-}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$129.7|g to (5)-, 230.4|g to 4-; possible band member 
T$from 2017Is03 in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g), presumably from fast-timing |g|g(t) method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$158.0|g to (6-), 287.8|g to (5)-; possible band member 
T$from 2017Is03 in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g), presumably from fast-timing |g|g(t) method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M5
level_comment:
J$Interpreted by 2017Ur03 as a spherical state with configuration=|ng{-7/2}~#|pg{-9/2} 
T$from decay curve for summed gates on 228.6-54.7-313.9 cascade (2017Ur03) in {+235}U(n,F|g):delayed |g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$186.2|g to (7-), 344.2|g to (6-); possible band member 
T$from 2017Is03 in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g), presumably from fast-timing |g|g(t) method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M6
level_comment:
J$110.8|g E2 to (8-), band member. 
T$from |g(t). Unweighted average of 0.72 |ms {I2} (2017Ur03 in {+235}U(n,F|g):delayed |g), 0.80 |ms {I2} (2013RuZX) and 0.83 |ms {I10} (1972GrYM,1970Gr38) in {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F|g)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from (428|g)(119|g)(|q) and |a(K)exp values 1-1-0 or 1-2-2 spin sequences are possible (1988MaYY,1989BeZG) for 548-119-0 levels, but (428|g)(119|g)(|q) data in SF decay (2017Ur03) supports 1-1-0 spin sequence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$see J|p comment for g.s. about |g|g(|q) data 
T$from |g(t) in 1987Oh05. Other: |?11 ns from |b|g(t) or |g|g(t) (1979ScZV), details of this measurement are not available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$other: 0.62 |ms from |b|g(t) or |g|g(t) (1979ScZV), details of this measurement are not available. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$level required by 240.2|g from 615 level in Table V of 2017Ur03, although 2017Ur03 stated that this level was not populated in this decay, and was not listed in their Table V. 2002PfZZ and 1987Ma58 show a weak population of this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Level not listed by 2017Ur03, who deduced that population of this level is <0.2%. With J|p=4-, this level is not expected to be populated in |b{+-} decay from 0+ parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03. The (36|g)(445|g)(|q) data in {+252}Cf SF decay (2017Ur03) support J=1 or 2 for 564 level 
T$|b|g(t) (2004Br14). Other: |?4 ns (1979ScZV). Same value in Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
$See level population in {+248}Cm SF decay (2017Ur03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2-)
level_comment:
$A 595.4 {I2} |g with renormalized intensity of 1.8 {I3} is reported from this level only by 2002PfZZ. It is omitted here as a gamma ray of such an intensity should have been seen in 2017Ur03 and 1987Ma58 
J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1 in 2017Ur03 
$2017Ur03 place an 864.2 {I2} |g from this level with an intensity of 0.25 {I5}, but this |g ray fits poorly in the decay scheme, with a deviation of 3 keV. Evaluators note that an 864.0 {I2} |g with the same relative intensity is placed by 2017Ur03 from 1464 level, in agreement with previous studies 2002PfZZ and 1987Ma58. Evaluators omit the 864.2|g from 986 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
T$from decay curve for prompt lines above the 564+x level gated at 444.7-keV line below the isomer in {+252}Cf SF data (2017Ur03). Other: 160 ns {I40} from {+248}Cm SF data 
$Interpreted by 2017Ur03 as deformed state with a band built on it as shown in authors' level-scheme Fig. 2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) (2013RuZX). Others: 7.2 |ms {I1} (1999Ge01) and 8.0 |ms {I2} (1972GrYM,1970Gr38). 1999Ge01 measured 204.2|g(t), the reported value could be affected by the short half-life component from T{-1/2}(374)=35.8 ns 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$other: <0.5 ns from |g(t) in 2002PfZZ, 2004Br14 
$Transition quadrupole moment=4.4 {I14}, |b=0.49 {I16} (2017Is03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$other: <1.0 ns from |g(t) in 2002PfZZ, 2004Br14 
$Transition quadrupole moment=2.9 {I11}, |b=0.32 {I12} (2017Is03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$other: <1.5 ns from |g(t) in 2002PfZZ, 2004Br14 
$Transition quadrupole moment>3.4, |b>0.38 (2017Is03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$6.87 |ms {I2} from (204.3|g)(t) and 6.80 |ms {I5} from (170.8|g)(t) (2017Ur03); value was increased by 0.10 |ms {I5} (by 2017Ur03) to correct for beam rate of |?500 ions/s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
E$971.3 in Table IV and Fig. 2 of 2017Ur03 seems a misprint 
T$from decay curve for summed gates on 228.6-54.7-313.9 cascade (2017Ur03). Authors note that only the isomers with T{-1/2}>0.3 |ms can be observed with the experimental arrangement at Lohengrin facility in Grenoble 
$Interpreted by 2017Ur03 as a spherical state with configuration=|ng{-7/2}~#|pg{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M4
level_comment:
T$from decay curve for summed intensities of 100.6-, 129.7-, 158.0-, 186.2-, and 110.8-keV |g rays, with fit to an exponent plus background (2017Ur03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-N From 2012Ma63. Other values: 3.14% {I17} (1993Ru01), 1.09% {I11} (1986ReZU), 0.96% {I15} (1983Re10), 3.0% {I2} (1982Ga24), 1.2% {I8} (1975As04),1.7% {I6} and 1.6% {I8} included in 1993Ru01, and 2.5% {I5} (1996Me09). 
MOMM1,MOME2$Laser Resonance Spectroscopy (LRS) (2007Ch07). 
Isotope shift: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=+1.904 fm{+2} (2007Ch07). 
J clearly indicated by fit of level energies to the formula for rotational levels. The 3/2+ fit is much worse (1985Me09). 
T$Weighted average of 1.40 s {I7} (2012Qu01), 1.486 s {I7} (1993Ru01), 1.47 s {I2} (1983Re10), 1.40 s {I15} (1982Ga14), 1.51 s {I8} (1979Se01), 1.45 s {I22} (1975As04), and 1.48 s {I2} (1996Me09). Other: 1.1 s {I3} (1972Sc48). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J level spacing suggests a rotational band with |DJ=1 for the 1655, 1869, and 2114 levels. |g from the first member to (7/2+) and |g to the second member from (17/2+) determines J|p=(11/2+) for the bandhead. 
T$Other: 1.4 ns from |g|g(t) in IT decay (1985Me09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J |g's to the (13/2+) and (19/2+) members of the g.s. band; no |g to (11/2+) 
T$Others: 8.6 |ms {I8} (1985Me09), 11 |ms {i2} (1999Ge01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$Syst uncertainty =15 ms 
$ Total of 6061 implantations observed, and 3394 correlated decay sequences. 
T$ values listed in table I: 1355 ms {I65} (syst) {I85} (stat), from maximum likelihood method (MLH); 1400 ms {I15} (syst) {I70} (stat), least-squares fit method. Value in Adopted dataset for {+99}Y in ENSDF database is 1.484 s {I7}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=26.9 ps {I19} 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=0.97 {I+4-3}, Q{-0}=5.00 {I+23-22} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=6.2 ps {I6} 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.25 {I+7-6}, Q{-0}=5.90 {I+34-30} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=3.6 ps {I3} 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.27 {I+6-5}, Q{-0}=4.96 {I+25-23} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=3.3 ps {I9} 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=0.92 {I+16-11}, Q{-0}=3.65 {I+65-43} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.471 fm {I23} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+89}Y,{+100}Sr)=1.985 fm{+2} {I1} (2013An02) 
J$E1 10.7|g from 1+; evidence of |b feedings to 2+ and 0+ levels in {+100}Zr; 1- favored by proposed configuration=|p5/2[303]~#|n3/2[411] (1987Wo07). From available experimental data, 2- is less likely, but not totally excluded. 
T$weighted average (NRM) of 0.66 s {I+15-12} (2009Pe06); 0.71 s {I3} (1996Me09); 0.638 s {I17} (1993Ru01); 0.735 s {I4} (1986ReZU, supersedes 728 ms {I4} in 1986Wa17); 0.735 s {I7} (1986Wo01); 0.65 s {I15} (1985IaZZ); 0.682 s {I18} (1983Mu19); and 0.55 s {I15} (1977Kh03). Conventional weighted average gives 729 ms {I8}, but with reduced |h{+2}=5.8, larger than 2.0 at 95% confidence level. Others: 0.845 s {I75} (least-squares fit method), 0.840 s {I97} (maximum likelihood method), both from 2012Qu01; 0.740 s {I20} (1987PfZX). 
$%|b{+-}n: weighted average of 1.8 {I6} (1996Me09), 1.08 {I5} (1993Ru01), 0.9 {I3} (1987PfZX), 0.85 {I9} (1986ReZU, supersedes 0.81 {I4} in 1986Wa17), and 0.9 {I2} (1986Wo01). Note that this value corresponds to one or both the activities: 732-ms g.s. and/or 0.94-s. Other: |<10 (2009Pe06) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=282.5 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=304.4 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.6 (2016Ma12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from JYFLTRAP mass measurements (2007Ha32) at IGISOL facility in Jyvaskyla. 2017Au03 give 144 {I16}. Note that measurement by 2007Ha32 gives only the energy difference between the two activities, not the association of either the spin or the half-life with each of the two activities. In |b{+-} spectra measured by 1988GrZX (also M. Graefenstedt et al., in Conf. Proc. AIP 164, 30 (1987)), Q(|b)=9310 keV {I70} for 0.94-s activity, which gives isomer energy of 260 keV {I72}, using Q(|b)(for the g.s.)=9050 keV {I14} (2017Wa10). 
T$from decay curves of 352|g and 212.5|g: weighted average of 0.94 s {I3} (1977Kh03) and 0.8 s {I3} (1977Pf01) 
J$spin from collinear laser spectroscopy technique (2010Ba31), where 0.94-s activity is associated with the 4+ state. Parity from comparison of measured |m=+2.71 |m{-n} 1 (2007Ch07) with theoretical values of +2.92 |m{-n} for the expected 4+ state with |p5/2[422]~#|n3/2[411] configuration, and +0.46 |m{-n} for the expected 4- state with |p5/2[503]~#|n3/2[411] configuration. In 2007Ch07 experiment, J=3 was favored in spin, while J|>4 ruled out from the observed hyperfine structure pattern, J=1 suggested unrealistic |b{-2}>0.7, and J=2 suggested |b{-2}=0.47, much too large to be consistent with a rigid, strongly deformed nucleus. In their later experiment (2010Ba31), J=4 was confirmed. 
$%|b{+-}n: for one or both the 732-ms and 0.94-s activities. See detailed comment about %|b{+-}n value for the g.s. 
MOMM1,MOME2$laser-hyperfine spectroscopy (2007Ch07). According to an e-mail reply from the first author (B. Cheal) of 2007Ch07 on February 1, 2007, there seemed uncertainty as to which of the two activities was observed, but they claimed to have observed only one state which they arbitrarily assumed as the g.s., but their later work in 2010Ba31 associated the activity produced with the 0.94-s activity. Note that |m=+2.55 {I1} and Q=+1.71 {I19} in 2007Ch07 were for J(145 level)=3. In the later 2010Ba31, |m and Q values for J=1,2,3,4 and 5 are listed 
$|D<r{+2}>({+100}Y-{+89}Y)=+1.94 fm{+2} {i20} (2007Ch07,2010Ba31) for J(145)=4. 2010Ba31 list also values for J=1,2,3 and 5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$allowed |b feeding (log| {Ift}|?4.4) from 0+ parent 
$Configuration=|p5/2[422]~#|n3/2[422] (1987Wo07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<2757 {I18} from Q(|b{+-}) (for {+100}Sr decay)-S(n)({+100}Y), where Q(|b{+-})=7506 {I13} and S(n)=4749 {I13} from 2017Wa10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted av: 0.50 s {i5} (1983Wo10), 0.44 {i2} (1986Wa17), disagrees with 1.10 s {i15} (1974GrZN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n=1.94 {I18} (ENSDF database for {+101}Y) 
T$ from 2009Pe06, statistical uncertainty=+70-60 and systematic uncertainty=30 combined in quadrature by compilers 
J$from ENSDF database for {+101}Y 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ Total of 239 implantations observed, and 117 correlated decay sequences. 
T$ values listed in table I: 480 ms {I30} (syst) {I+140-110} (stat), from maximum likelihood method (MLH). Value in Adopted dataset for {+101}Y in ENSDF database is 450 ms {I20}. Other: 510 ms {I+76-67} (2009Pe06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=19.1 ps {I27} from text, 19.1 ps {I30} is given in Table III. 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.08 {I+9-7}, Q{-0}=6.07 {I+53-44} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=8.0 ps {I10}, considered as an upper limit, as 2017Ha12 state that correction for the feeding time into the 9/2+ state could not be deduced due to unresolved doublets 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.05 {I7}, Q{-0}=5.06 {I+37-31} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: HIGH J
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%|b{+-}n: weighted average of 6.0 {I17} (1986ReZS) and 4.0 {I15} (1996Me09). Should be considered as a combined value for both isomers 
E$from systematics in lighter Y isotopes, two {+102}Y isomers are expected. Experimental evidence for the existence of two isomers is based on a different I(152|g)/I(326|g) ratio obtained in the studies of 1983Sh13 and 1988HiZQ. J|p probably high because production method via {+235}U(n,F) favors high-spin isomer. Th high spin isomer is directly produced in the fission reaction. See also general comment 
T from 1983Sh13, |g(t). Contamination of T{-1/2} by low-spin isomer cannot be excluded. Others: 0.27 s {I7} (1981HiZX), 0.5 s {I1}, |b{+-} delayed neutron decay (1980KrZY). 0.44 s {I6} (1986ReZS). 0.9 s {I3} (1974GrZN) is probably incorrect 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: LOW J
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%|b{+-}n: weighted average of 6.0 {I17} (1986ReZS) and 4.0 {I15} (1996Me09) should be considered as a combined value for both isomers 
E the assignment based on mass-separated samples of A=102 produced in {+235}U(n,F) with {+102}Sr as major activity. As a consequence primarily the decay of the low-spin isomer of {+102}Y is fed in the |b{+-} decay of {+102}Sr and as such indirectly produced. 
T Weighted average of 0.30 s {I6} (1991Hi02) and 0.29 s {I2} (1996Me09). Slight contamination of T{-1/2} by high-spin isomer cannot be excluded. Other: 0.44 s {I6} (1986ReZS) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J,%B-N$from Adopted Levels for {+103}y in ENSDF database 
T$ measured by 2011Ni01 from the analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve. Earlier values: 230 ms {I20} (Adopted Levels for {+103}Y in ENSDF database); 260 ms {I+41-32} (2009Pe06: Phys Rev C 79, 035806 (2009)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=3.80, %|b{+-}2n=0 (2003Mo09) 
E$measured half-life is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+104}Y 
J$5/2+ neutron and 5/2+ proton orbital from theoretical considerations (1997Mo25) 
T$from weighted average of 198 ms {I20} (2015Lo04, ion-|b correlated curve); 197 ms {I4} (2011Ni01, ion-|b-correlated curve); 260 ms {I+61-51} (2009Pe06, ion-|b correlated curves, systematic uncertainty=10 ms and statistical uncertainty=+60-50 ms combined in quadrature), 180 ms {I60} (1999Wa09, neutron-decay curve) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$[5/2+] assigned by the evaluators from systematics 
T$from 2015Lo04; Others: 160 ms {I+86-62} (2009Pe06), 83 ms {I+5-4} (2011Ni01) 
CONF$5/2+[422] assigned by the evaluators 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=16.9, %|b{+-}2n=0.55 (2003Mo09) 
E$measured half-life is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+106}Y 
J$5/2+ proton and 1/2+ neutron orbital from theoretical considerations (1997Mo25). J|p=2+,3+ proposed in 2011Su11 based on comparison with J|p of {+108}Nb g.s. 
T$weighted average of 82 ms {I+10-5} (2015Lo04, ion-|b correlated curve), and 62 ms {I+25-14} (2011Ni01, ion-|b-correlated curve) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=35.4, %|b{+-}2n=0.12 (2003Mo09) 
E$measured half-life is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+107}Y 
J$5/2+ from systematics (2012Au07) and theoretical considerations (1997Mo25) 
T$from 2015Lo04 (ion-|b correlated curve) using maximum likelihood method. Other: 41 ms {I+15-9} (2011Ni01, ion-|b-correlated curve). Note that 2015Lo04 list uncertainty of 0.3 ms in their Table I, which seems a misprint in view of value plotted in their Fig. 2 and quoted uncertainties for other isotopes in Table I 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=34.8, %|b{+-}2n=2.4 (2003Mo09) 
E$measured half-life is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+108}Y 
J$5/2+ proton and 7/2- neutron orbital from theoretical considerations (1997Mo25) 
T$from 2015Lo04 (ion-|b correlated curve). Other: 25 ms {I+66-10} (2011Ni01, ion-|b-correlated curve) 
$ Measured |s=97 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?40% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$from systematics of the lighter, odd-A Y isotopes. J|p=5/2+ is predicted in 1997Mo25 
T$using ion-|b(t) in 2015Lo04. 
CONF$likely |p5/2+[422] orbital. The assignment is tentative. 
$%|b{+-}n=55.6 and %|b{+-}2n=1.5 are predicted in 1997Mo25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Theoretical |b decay half-life=29.7 ms (2019Mo01) 
$Tentative identification of {+77}Zr isotope. 
E$the observed event is assumed to correspond to the g.s. of {+77}Zr. 
J$|W{-n}=3/2+ (theory, 2019Mo01), also 3/2+ from systematics (2017Au03) 
T$100 |ms from systematics (2017Au03), 29.7 ms (theory for |b decay mode, 2019Mo01). 
$Measured cross section of 1.2|*10{+-10} mb {I+29-10} (2017Su31) in {+9}Be({+124}Xe,X),E({+124}Xe)=345 MeV/nucleon is consistent with theoretical (EPAX3.1a) cross section of 4.49|*10{+-10} mb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$estimated from time-of-flight (2007WeZX,2001Ki13). Actual half-life is expected to be much greater as suggested by calculated value of 260 ms (1997m025) and systematics value of 50 ms (2003Au02) 
$ Calculated %ECP is not given by 1997M025 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}>450 ns from time-of-flight. 
$Four counts were assigned to {+78}Zr from A/Q and Z distributions 
$Observed fragments were assumed to be in ground state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from 1999Bl08. Other: 80 ms {I+400-40} (2001Ki13,2000StZU). 
J$5/2+ from systematics (2012Au07) and from theoretical considerations (1997Mo25). Based on relativistic mean field (RMF) calculations, 2001Pa02 obtain 5/2+ for prolate shape (|b{-2}|?+0.5), 9/2+ for oblate shape (|b{+2}|?-0.18) and 1/2- for spherical shape. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$ from 2003Au02; weighted average of 4.1 s {I+8-6} (2000Re03) and 5.3 s {I+11-9} (2001Ki13,2002Fa13). Calculation of cluster decay of {+80}Zr: 1991Gu03 
|b{-2}|?0.4 (from energies of 2+ and 4+ states (1987Li14)). 1991Zh23 discuss this state in terms of superdeformation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$E{-GDR} deduced by compiler from excitation energy E{+*}=54 MeV, mean rotational energy |4E{-rot}|5=14 MeV {I7} and mean temperature |4T|5=1.6 MeV {I3} in Table 2, with |4T|5=[(E{+*}-|4E{-rot}|5-E{-GDR})/a]{+1/2}, where a=A/8 MeV{+-1} in 2017Ce01. 
$Mean angular momentum <J>=25 ~h {I6} 
$isospin-violating spreading remains constant with the excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=207 ps {I19} (2020Ll01) for fully stripped ion, determined using a 2D |h{+2}-minimization procedure, as described in 2016Mi04 (Phys. Rev. C 93, 024318). Systematic uncertainties have been included. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%ECP From 1999Hu05, based on comparison of measured T{-1/2} with partial proton T{-1/2} calculated using statistical model, assuming 24% {I8} of delayed protons (1977FaZW, 1980HaZG; p-386|g coin) feed the first 2+ state of {+80}Sr. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from decay curves of gammas (1982Li17). Other: 1982De36 report 2.5 min {I1} from positron activity but find no gammas. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 44 s {I1} (1982Li17), 45 s {I4} (1981SaZO), 44 s {I2} (1982De36) and 37.8 s {I11} (1983Ha06). 
J$from systematics; the g.s. of all other N=43 isotones ({+85}Mo, {+81}Sr, {+79}Kr) have J|p=1/2-. However, J|p=1/2+, 3/2, or 5/2- are also possible. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g). Other: 0.50 |ms {I25} from neutron-|g(t) in {+58}Ni({+28}S,2pn|g). 
J$E2 52.7|g to (1/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from neutron-|g(t) in {+58}Ni({+28}S,2pn|g) (1988Su15). Others: 2.0 |ms {I2} from |b|g(t) in {+83}Nb |e decay, 132 ns {I55} from |g|g(t) in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g). 
J$E1 24.3|g to (5/2-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$effective lifetime of 2.0 ps {I3} from RDDS in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g) (1989Fi06). 
J$682|g to (7/2+), M1+E2 630|g to (9/2+), band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$effective lifetime of 1.7 ps {I4} from RDDS in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g) (1989Fi06). 
J$E2 679|g to (7/2-), band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$effective lifetime of 0.83 ps {I21} from RDDS in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g) (1989Fi06). 
J$E2 922|g to (13/2-), band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$effective lifetime of 0.83 ps {I21} from RDDS in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g) (1989Fi06). 
J$E2 913|g to (15/2-), band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 1096|g to (17/2+), band assignment 
T$weighted average of 0.38 ps {I6} from RDDS and 0.35 ps {I14} from DSAM in {+54}Fe({+32}S,2pn|g) (1989Fi06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 25.7 min {i5} (1983Sh27), 27.6 min {i9} (1982Sa34), 24.0 min {i13} (1982Li17) other: 27 min {i2} (1982De36). Earlier reports of identification of {+84}Zr nuclide by 1971Yu02 with half-life of 5.0 min {I5} and that of 1965Za02 with half-life of 16 min {I4} were, most likely, incorrect nuclidic assignments 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+0.48 {I10} from g=+0.5 {I1} (1992Mo07), +0.24 {I35} (1999Te02), +0.5 {I5} (2001Zh44) 
T$2001Ra27 evaluation gives adopted T{-1/2}=14.1 ps 8 and B(E2)(|^)=0.438 {I25}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+0.51 {I23} from g=+0.4 {I3} (1992Mo07), +0.70 {I65}, +1.0 {I8} (1999Te02), +0.5 {I5} (2001Zh44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+0.57 {I35} from g=+1.9 {I11} (1992Mo07), +0.20 {I56} (1999Te02), +0.6 {I5} (2001Zh44) 
T$other: 1.9 ps {i4} (1996Ch02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+1.2 {I4} from g=+1.4 {I4} (Mountford's thesis, Manchester (1991), as quoted by 1993Ch41 and 1999Te02), +0.54 {I72} (1999Te02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+1.3 {I6} from g=+1.5 {I6} (1992Mo07), +1.0 {I6} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 1.25 ps {i7}, (1992Mo07), 1.5 ps {i4} (1996Ch02), 1.4 ps {i4} (1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+0.9 {I5} from g=+0.5 {I8} (1992Mo07), +1.2 {I7} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.53 ps {i3} (1992Mo07), 0.97 ps {i21} (1996Ch02), 1.04 ps {i21} (1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+0.8 {I6} from g=+0.9 {I7} (1992Mo07), +0.8 {I6} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.55 ps {i14} (1996Ch02), 0.60 ps {i3} (1992Mo07), 0.62 ps {i14}( 1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. Weighted average g=+1.0 {I5} from g=+1.3 {I5} (1992Mo07), +0.5 {I7} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.42 ps {i14} (1996Ch02), 0.340 ps {i21} (1992Mo07), 0.35 ps {i3} (1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$transient-field methods in heavy-ion |g-ray studies. g=+0.5 {I7} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.15 ps {i5} (1996Ch02), 0.12 ps (1992Mo07), 0.125 ps {i14} (1983Pr08), g-factor estimated as +0.6 {i1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|?(21) from 1995Ji08 and 2003Le08 
T$from Doppler-shift analysis (2006Ch09) 
$55% branching to normal-deformed states, but only about 2% is accounted for by three transitions from this level to the normal- deformed states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g factor: weighted average of +0.5 {I1} (1992Mo07), +0.24 {I35} (1999Te02), +0.5 {I5} (2001Zh44) 
T$other: 16.6 ps {i14} (1996Ch02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g factor: weighted average of +0.4 {I3} (1992Mo07), +0.70 {I65}, +1.0 {I8} (1999Te02), +0.5 {I5} (2001Zh44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g factor: weighted average of +1.9 {I11} (1992Mo07), +0.20 {I56} (1999Te02), +0.6 {I5} (2001Zh44) 
T$other: 1.9 ps {i4} (1996Ch02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g-factor: weighted average of +1.4 {I4} (Mountford's thesis, Manchester (1991) as quoted by 1993Ch41 and 1999Te02), +0.54 {I72} (1999Te02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g-factor: average of +1.5 {I6} (1992Mo07), +1.0 {I6} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 1.25 ps {i7} (1992Mo07), 1.5 ps {i4} (1996Ch02), 1.4 ps {i4} (1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g-factor: weighted average of +0.5 {I8} (1992Mo07), +1.2 {I7} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.53 ps {i3} (1992Mo07), 0.97 ps {i21} (1996Ch02), 1.04 ps {i21} (1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g-factor: average of +0.9 {I7} (1992Mo07), +0.8 {I6} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.55 ps {i14} (1996Ch02), 0.60 ps {i3} (1992Mo07), 0.62 ps {i14}( 1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g-factor: weighted average of +1.3 {I5} (1992Mo07), +0.5 {I7} (2001Zh44) 
T$others: 0.42 ps {i14} (1996Ch02), 0.340 ps {i21} (1992Mo07), 0.35 ps {i3} (1983Pr08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$others: 0.15 ps {i5} (1996Ch02), 0.12 ps (1992Mo07), 0.125 ps {i14} (1983Pr08), g-factor estimated as +0.6 {i1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$J|?(21) from 1995Ji08 and 2003Le08 
T$from Doppler-shift analysis (2006Ch09), details of this measurement are not yet available 
$55% branching to normal-deformed states, but only about 2% is accounted for by three transitions from this level to the normal- deformed states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$possible allowed |b feeding to (5/2+) and (7/2)+; 292|g from (1/2-), 10.9-s isomer is most likely of multipolarity higher than quadrupole 
T$from weighted average of 7.85 min {I4} (1972Tu07, |b counting) and 7.90 min {I10} (1977Ia01). Others: 8.4 min {I3} (1982De36), 7.92 min {I15} (1976Ia01, same group as 1977Ia01), 6.0 min {I10} (1971Yu02), 8.0 min {I5} (1971AwZZ), 7.7 min {I5} (1971Do01), 6 min (1963Bu06); inclusion of these other values in the averaging procedure does not change the adopted value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Both |e and IT decay modes have been observed but branching ratio is unknown. From relative photon intensities of 416.5|g in {+85}y from |e decay and 292.2|g in {+85}Zr from IT decay, it seems IT decay mode is dominant 
J$from analogy with other N=45 nuclei. 
T$from timing of 292|g; weighted average of 10.9 s 3 (1976Ia01) and 12 s 2 (2005Ka39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 0+ 
T$average of 7.8 ps {i19} (RDM in {+58}Ni({+32}S,4p|g), 1998Ka19); and 7.3 ps {i14} (RDM in {+73}Ge({+16}O,3n|g), 1978Av02) 
MOMM1$IMPAD method (2001Zh44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 2+ 
T$from RDM (1998Ka19). Other: 6.0 ps {I27} (1978Av02) 
MOMM1$IMPAD method (2001Zh44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+,3-)
level_comment:
J$|g rays to (2+) and 4+; |g from (5-). J|p=4+ is preferred by 2000DoZV from some evidence of feeding of this level from 3030 of J|p=5+,6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 4+ 
T$from RDM (1998Ka19). Other: 8 ps {I4} (1978Av02) 
MOMM1$IMPAD method (2001Zh44) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, (E1) |g to 4+ 
T$from RDM (1978Av02). Other: 14 ps {I7} (1998Ka19, effective half-life) 
$g=+0.46 {I21} (1995Mo02, average value for 2705.6, 3424.0 and 4430 levels, transient-field method) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$recoil distance transient-field method (1999Te02). Others: -0.2 {I26} (1999Te02), -0.24 {I72} (1995We03, IMPAD method), -8 {I5} (1995Mo02, transient-field), -8.8 {I56} (2001Zh44, IMPAD method). 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 6+ 
T$from RDM (1998Ka19). Others: 62 ps {I7} (1985Wa10), 62 ps {I6} (1978Av02). 1998Ka19 point out that the omission of the data points beyond 2 mm distance gives T{-1/2}|?65 ps. 
Alignment in |ng{-9/2} quasiparticles is inferred (1995Mo02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g=+0.46 {I21} (1995Mo02, average value for 2705.6, 3424.0 and 4430 levels, transient-field method) 
J$|DJ=2, (E2) |g to (5-) 
T$average of 5.3 ps {I21} (1998Ka19) and 8.3 ps {I14} (1985Wa10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$recoil distance transient-field method (1999Te02). Other: g=+1.06 {I22} (1995Mo02, average value for 3532.6 and 4419.0 levels, transient-field) 
J$|DJ=0, M1(+E2) to 8+ 
T$from RDM (1998Ka19). Other: <3 ps (1985Wa10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$recoil distance transient-field method (1999Te02). Others: -13 {I9} (2001Zh44, IMPAD), -5 {I10} (1995Mo02, transient-field). 
J$|DJ=2 E2 |g to 8+ 
T$other: 2.2 ps {I7} (1998Ka19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g=+1.06 {I22} (1995Mo02, average value for 3532.6 and 4419.0 levels, transient-field) 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 8+ 
T$other: 7.6 ps {I28} (1998Ka19,effective half-life) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g=+0.46 {I21} (1995Mo02, average value for 2705.6, 3424.0 and 4430 levels, transient-field method) 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to (7-) 
T$other: 7.6 ps {I28} (1998Ka19,effective half-life) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$recoil distance transient-field method (1999Te02). Others: -4 {I10} (1995Mo02, transient-field), -3.6 {I72} (2001Zh44, IMPAD). 
J$|DJ=2, (E2) |g to 10+ 
T$other: 3.5 ps {I14} (1998Ka19,effective half-life) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$recoil distance transient-field method (1999Te02). Others: +26 {I8} (1995Mo02, transient field), +28 {I6} (1998Ju10, recoil distance transient-field), +11 {I13} (2001Zh44, IMPAD) 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to (12+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (16+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, (M1+E2) |g to (15+); |g to (14+) 
T$others: <1.0 ps (1985Wa10), 0.59 ps {I+14-2} (1991Ch40). 
MOMM1$IMPAD method 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
E$based on ordering of 933-908 cascade suggested by 2000Do04. Reversed ordering in 1991Ch40 gave E(level)=5042 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of |t=1.1 ps {I2} (from 1039|g gate), |t=1.55 ps {I14} (from 628|g gate), and |t=0.92 ps {I44} (from 718|g gate) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of |t=70.9 ps {I10} (from 234|g gate), |t=71.8 ps {I10} (from 1027|g gate), and |t=60 ps {I12} (from fast timing method). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J from log{Ift}=5.7 allows J|p=9/2+, 7/2+, or 11/2+. A log{Ift}=8.10 to a 5/2- level rules out 11/2+. log{Ift}=6.77 to the 11/2+ 1591.3 level rules out 7/2+. Collinear laser spectroscopy of cool bunched ion beams was performed on {+87}Zr providing information on mean-square charge radii, magnetic moments, and extracted quadrupole moments for the ground state. In addition, these measurements provide additional arguments for the 9/2+ assignment for the ground state based on Zr systematics of strong prolate deformations for N < 50 (2002Fo12) 
T from 1984Pr01. However, their measured results of 1.684 {I1} and 1.667 {I6} would give an average of about 1.682 {I3}. So, the authors seem to have chosen to increase their final uncertainty. Other: 1.69 h {I2} (1989Sh39). 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear LASER spectroscopy 
$|b{-2}=0.10 {I1} from 2002Fo12 
$Mean square charge radius around 18.7 fm{+2} corresponding to |b{-2} between 0.1 and 0.2 (2002Ca47) from LASER spectroscopy 
$The 9/2, as opposed to 7/2, spin assignment is consistent with the larger quadrupole moment. See 2002Fo12 for more detail. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
MOMM1$from collinear LASER spectroscopy 
J$Uniquely established using collinear laser spectroscopy, see 2002Fo12. E3|g from the 335 level to the 200 level and M1+E2|g from the 200 level to the gs, establishes |p(335 level)=- and J|p(200 level)=7/2+ 
T from isomeric decay. 
%IT no |e decay from this level has been observed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J from log{Ift}=5.8 from (9/2+) and |D\ J=1 transition to 9/2+ based on angular distribution measurement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$from 1973St29. Others: 82.6 d {I2} (private communication quoted by 1984Pr01), 85 d (1953Hy52). 
$|d<r{+2}>{+90,88}=0.061 fm{+2} {I5} (2013An02, 2003Th03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 1057|g to 0+, L(p,t)=2 
T$from DSAM in {+12}C({+84}Sr,{+88}Zr|g). Other: 0.83 ps {I+4-2} from DSAM in {+89}Y(p,2n|g) 
MOMM1$from transient field technique in {+12}C({+84}Sr,{+88}Zr|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,{+6}Li)=2; L(p,t)=(2), |g|g(|q) in {+89}Y(p,2n|g) 
T$from DSAM in {+12}C({+84}Sr,{+88}Zr|g). Other: 0.21 ps {I9} from DSAM in {+89}Y(p,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=4 
T$from DSAM in {+12}C({+84}Sr,{+88}Zr|g) 
MOMM1$from transient field technique in {+12}C({+84}Sr,{+88}Zr|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$E2 77|g to 6+, L(p,t)=(8,6) 
T$from |g(t) (1978Ha52). Others: 1.41 |ms {I+12-9} (2004Ch35) using |g(t); 1.28 |ms {I10}, 1.75 |ms {I20} from |g(t) in {+89}Y(p,2n|g). 
MOMM1$from g=-0.2264 {I20} measured by |g(H,|q,t) in heavy-ion reactions (1978Ha52). Other: g=-0.20 {I2} from {+89}Y(p,2n|g). 
MOME2$from time-differential perturbed |g-ray angular distribution of ions implanted in non-cubic crystals (1985Ra09). Sign determined by 1986Be06. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
J$7,9,11 from |g(|q) and linear polarization of populating 1003|g in {+74}Ge({+18}O,4n|g), 944.5|g to 5- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$(11,13)+ from |g(|q) and transition strength in {+74}Ge({+18}O,4n|g). High spin favored in heavy ion fusion reactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from |g(H,|q,t) (1978Ki06); value includes the lattice relaxation time. Other: 1.75 |ms {I20} from |g(t) in 1971Is04. 
G$from |g(H,|q,t) (1978Ki06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W{-max}=14 
L$(4,6) from DWBA analysis of 1969Ba08. 
E$1971Ba43 report an unresolved multiplet at 2.6 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.56 ps {I7} and 0.62 ps {I7} determined from a lineshape analysis of the 1818|g and 761|g, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E$Isomeric ratio R=69 % {I5} (2017Pa35) 
T$From |g(t) in 2017Pa35, but the gating |g-ray transitions were not given by the authors 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$RMS charge radius: (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=4.2715 fm {I11} (2004An14 evaluation; and 2008 update available at http://cdfe.sinp.msu.ru) 
$ |d<r{+2}>({+90}Zr,{+89}Zr)=+0.012 fm{+2} {I9} (2003Th03, statistical and systematic uncertainties of 0.005 and 0.008, respectively have been combined in quadrature by the evaluator) 
MOMM1,MOME2$ collinear laser spectroscopy (2003Th03, also 2002Ca47, 2002Fo12,2005Bi25). Others: |m=-1.072 {I23} (1997Hi06) and -1.08 {I2} (1996Oh03) using NMR on oriented nuclei and |g(|q,t,h). 
J$L=4 and Ay(|q) in (pol p,d) 
T$weighted average (LWM and normalized-residuals method) of 78.62 h {I17} (1984Sk01), 78.0 h {I2} (1969Ro02) and 78.43 h {I8} (1964Va03); normalized |h{+2}=2.9. Rajeval technique gives 78.45 h {I7} with |h{+2}=1 but the uncertainty of value from 1969Ro02 is adjusted to 0.5. Others: 79.4 h {I2} (1961Ra06,half-life incorrectly assigned to {+90}Zr decay), 79.0 h {I5} (1960Ha26), 79 h {I2} (1953Sh48), 78 h (1953Ka11), 79.3 h (1951Sh24), 77 h (1951Hy24), 78 h {I1} (1940Du05), 70 h (1940Sa08, Sagne et al., Phys. Rev 54, 542 (1938)) 
|n1g{-9/2}{+-1} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+90}Zr,{+89}Zr)=-0.018 fm{+2} {I10} (2003Th03, statistical and systematic uncertainties of 0.006 and 0.008, respectively, have been combined in quadrature by the evaluator) 
MOMM1$ collinear laser spectroscopy (2003Th03, also 2002Ca47, 2002Fo12,2005Bi25) 
J$L=1 and Ay(|q) in (pol p,d) 
T$weighted average (normalized residuals method) of 4.145 min {I9} (1992KaZM), 4.16 min {I6} (1969Ro02) and 4.18 min {I1} (1964Va03); |h{+2}=1.8. The LWM method gives 4.161 min {I12} with |h{+2}=3.4 and Rajeval technique gives 4.148 min {I9} with |h{+2}=0.6 but adjusting uncertainty to 0.04 for value from 1964Va03. Others: 4.40 min {I4} (1953Sh48), 4.25 min (1953Ka11), 4.4 min {I1} (1951Sh89), 4.5 min (1940Du05) 
|n2p{-1/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0 from 5/2+ target 
T$weighted average of 0.40 ps {I3} ((|a,n|g),1974Bi13) and 0.26 ps {I4} ((p,n|g),1972Gi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L=1 and Ay(|q) in (pol p,d) 
T$weighted average of 0.40 ps {I10} ((|a,n|g),1974Bi13) and 0.49 ps {I13} ((p,n|g),1972Gi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0 from 5/2+ target 
T$weighted average of 0.56 ps {I12} ((|a,n|g),1974Bi13) and 0.32 ps {I13} ((p,n|g),1972Gi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=(0), E1 |g to 13/2+; |DJ=2, M2+E3 |g to 9/2+ 
T$from |g(t) pulsed-beam in ({+18}O,xn|g) (1986Bi09). Other: <3.4 ns {I2} (RDDS in ({+18}O,xn|g),1986Wa25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0+2 for a 2130 keV doublet suggests 5/2+ for one level and (1/2:9/2)+ for the second; the latter associated with 2132.3 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2)+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=7.6 from (9/2+); |g to 9/2+; L(p,t)=0+2 for a 2130 keV doublet suggests 5/2+ for one level and (1/2:9/2)+ for the second. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, (M1(+E2)) |g to 13/2-; |DJ=1 |g to 13/2+ 
T$<3.4 ns {I2} from RDDS in ({+18}O,xn|g) (1986Wa25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$shell-model prediction for a 17/2- level at 2030 or 2080 (2012Sa36) 
T$|<3.4 ns {I2} from RDDS in ({+18}O,xn|g) (1986Wa25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=4 from 1/2-; L(p,d)=(4+1) suggests a doublet with J|p=(9/2+,7/2+) and (1/2-,3/2-). The higher spin level likely corresponds to 2298, (7/2)+ level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2+4+6 from 5/2+ target; |DJ=(1) |g to 9/2+; L(p,d)=(4+1) for a doublet 
T$weighted average of 87 fs {I14} ((|a,n|g),1974Bi13) and 73 fs {I21} ((p,n|g),1972Gi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=4 from 5/2+ target; |g rays to 9/2+ and 3/2- and RUL 
T$average of 0.13 ps {I4} ((|a,n|g),1974Bi13) and 0.12 ps {I4} ((p,n|g),1972Gi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=(4+1) suggests a doublet with J|p=(9/2+,7/2+) and (1/2-,3/2-). One of these levels may correspond to 2388.6 level, but the spin is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 from 5/2+ target; log| {Ift}=5.9 from (9/2+), |g to 9/2+ and RUL 
T$DSA in (p,n|g) (1972Gi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2)-
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=4 from 1/2- suggests 7/2-,9/2-; L(p,t)=0+3 from 5/2+ target for a 2732 {I3} group suggests 5/2+ for one level and (1/2:11/2)- for a second level, associated here with 2730 keV level; |g to 9/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0+3 from 5/2+ target for a doublet at 2732 keV; the latter component is associated with 2730 level. L({+3}He,|a)=4 for a probable doublet suggests 7/2+,9/2+ which may correspond to an additional level near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.6 from (9/2+) and |g rays to 5/2- and 5/2+. J|p=7/2+,9/2+ suggested by L=4 component of L(p,d)=3+4; L(p,t)=2 from 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from g factor=0.89 {I4} (TDPAD method,1988Ba11). 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 17/2+; |DJ=1, (E1) |g to (19/2-) 
T$weighted average of 5.12 ns {I16} (1986Bi09), |g(t) with pulsed beam in ({+18}O,xn|g) (1986Bi09) and 5.2 ns {I3} (RDDS in ({+18}O,xn|g), 1986Wa25). Other: 5.9 ns {I1} (|g|g(t),1981ArZM) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}|?7.2 (9/2+); |g to 9/2+. L({+3}He,|a)=3 for a 3530 group 
E$it is assumed by the evaluator that ({+3}He,|a) and (t,p) populate different levels as suggested by opposite parities from L transfers in the two reactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}|?7.4 from (9/2+). L(t,p)=2 from 5/2+ target. See also J|p and level energy comments for 3531.1 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to (17/2-); |DJ=1, M1 |g to (19/2-). L(pol p,|p{+-})=10 from 0+ for a 3810 {I80} level suggesting 21/2+ is inconsistent with negative parity from high-spin gamma-ray studies. Proposed (1984Gr22) configuration=(|pg{-9/2}{+2}~#|ng{-9/2}{+-1}) is also inconsistent with shell-model predictions. No 21/2+ level is predicted near this energy according to shell-model calculations by 2012Sa36 
T$DSA in ({+18}O,xn|g) (1986Wa25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2,11/2)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=7.3 from (9/2+). J|p=7/2- is proposed for a 3950 {I50} level in (pol p,d) from L=3 and Ay(|q); 5/2-,7/2- from L({+3}He,|a)=3 for a 3930 {I12} level. Thus either 3931 or 3948 level has J|p=7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$|DJ=(1) |g to (23/2)+; L(pol p,|p{+-})=12 from 0+ 
T$DSA in ({+18}O,xn|g) (1986Wa25). Other: 0.18 ps in (|a,3n|g) (1980ArZU) 
$ Configuration=(|pg{-9/2}{+2}~#|ng{-9/2}{+-1}) stretched (1984Gr22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$L=3 and Ay(|q) in (pol p,d). A complex structure is suggested in (pol p,d), the second component with L=(2), J|p=5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$L=3 and Ay(|q) in (pol p,d). Possible mixture of L(p,d)=(1) in a complex peak suggests (1/2-,3/2-) for second component 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$L=3 and Ay(|q) in (pol p,d). IAS of 5/2-, 1745 in {+89}Y 
E$wide structure in ({+3}He,|a) (1978Va05) 
|G=22 keV in (p,d) (1977IkZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
E$13800 {I2200} in (p,d), a wide structure 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=L(p,d)=3; IAS of an unresolved 7/2- state in {+89}Y 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from 1972Gi06. 1969Li17 propose 11/2 and exclude 7/2 from excitation function, but |g to 3/2- excludes 11/2 from RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
1975Gr11 conclude that this state is not a pure antianalog state (as concluded from L=1 by 1971Hi11), since with L=2, this population of this state in ({+3}He,t) involves spin-flip (S=1) through configuration= (|pg{-9/2}~#|ng{-9/2}{+-1}){-1+}~#|pp{-1/2}. Dominant configuration=(|pg{-9/2}{+2}){-0+}~#|np{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$from 1969Ba21. 595 {I8} (1977Ga18) 
S$1.6 (1981Du13), 2.7 (1969Ba21), 2.02 (1968Ru02), 1.7 (1967Fo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
S$3.0, 0.66, 1.88 (1977Ga18); 2.4 (1981Du13); 0.7 (1967Fo04) 
E$isobaric analog state of {+89}Y g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E$centroid of 7000-12300 structure (1981Du13). 1978Va05 report a wide structure centered at 9 MeV with L=4 (g9/2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2)+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=309 
J$9/2+ in Adopted Levels 
$ Enhancement factor=1.1 (1972Bb03) 
$ Integrated |s=74.0 |mb {I21} (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:11/2)-
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=75.4 
J$1/2- in Adopted Levels 
$ Enhancement factor=1.0 (1972Bb03) 
$ Integrated |s=17.5 |mb {I17} for 584 group (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2,7/2)-
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=94.9 
J$3/2- in Adopted Levels 
$ Enhancement factor=0.45 
$ Integrated |s=16.6 |mb {I17} for 1089 group (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2:15/2)-
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=28.9 
J$5/2- in Adopted Levels 
E$ 1450 3 (1972Bb03) 
L$ other: 1+3+5 (1972Bb03) 
$ Enhancement factor=0.35 
$ Integrated |s=19.5 |mb {I23} for 1437 group (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=124 
$ Enhancement factor=2.7 
E$ 1626 3 (1972Bb03) 
$ Integrated |s=22.4 |mb {I23} for 1612 group (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:11/2)-
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=11.3 
J$1/2- in Adopted Levels 
E$ 1743 3 (1972Bb03) 
L$ other: 1+3 (1972Bb03) suggests (3/2:7/2)-, in disagreement with adopted J|p=1/2- 
$ Enhancement factor=0.09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=156 
$ Enhancement factor=3.4 
$ Integrated |s=31.6 |mb {I21} for 1814 group (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:9/2)+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=6.52 
J$(5/2)+ in Adopted Levels 
L$ others: 2+4+6 (1972Bb03) suggests (7/2,9/2)+ in disagreement with adopted (5/2)+, (2) (1972Aw01) 
$ Enhancement factor=0.09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=21.3 
E,L$ doublet with 55% L=0 and 45% L=2 admixture 
J$5/2+ for one level and (7/2,9/2)+ for the other in 'adopted levels' 
$ Integrated |s=12.4 |mb {I20} for 2100 group (1972Aw01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:9/2)+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=1.10 
J$(1/2:5/2)+ in Adopted Levels 
$ Integrated |s=7 |mb {I3} for 2560 group (1972Aw01); probably corresponds to 2538+2563+2575 composite 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:9/2)+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=2.38 
J$7/2+,9/2+ in Adopted Levels 
L$ others: 1+3 (1972Bb03) in disagreement with L=2 (2002Gu03), and L=(2) (1972Aw01) 
E$ 2570 3 (1972Bb03) 
$ Enhancement factor=0.02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=9.73 
E,L$ doublet with 10% L=0 and 90% L=3 admixture 
J$(5/2+) for one level and (7/2,9/2)- for the other in Adopted Levels 
E$ 2725 3 (1972Bb03) 
$ Integrated |s=25 |mb {I3} for 2727 group (1972Aw01); probably corresponds to 2713+2732+2755 composite 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=2.50 
E,L$ doublet with 10% L=2 and 90% L=5 admixture 
J$5/2-,7/2- for one level and (5/2,7/2)+ for the other in 'adopted levels' 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=47.9 
L$ other: L=0 for a 2961 group in 1972Aw01, most likely corresponds to 2996 group in 2002Gu03 
$ Integrated |s=25 |mb {I3} for 2961 group (1972Aw01); probably corresponds to 2958+2996 composite 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:9/2)+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=3.91 
J$9/2+ in Adopted Levels 
$ Integrated |s=12 |mb {I4} for 3145 group (1972Aw01); probably corresponds to 3144+3153+3181 composite 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2:9/2)+
level_comment:
$INTEGRATED=7.72 
J$(7/2+,9/2+) in Adopted Levels 
$ Integrated |s=10 |mb {I6} for 3528 group (1972Aw01); probably corresponds to 3513+3535+3552 composite 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$|<3.4 ns {I2} (1986Wa25) (see figure 4 and section 3.1.2). The authors also quote >69 ns in table 2 and <69 ns (from |g|g(t)) in table 4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$other: 5.2 ns {I3} (RDDS 1986Wa25) 
G$TDPAD method 
Configuration=(|pg{-9/2}{+2}){-8+}(|ng{-9/2}{+-1}) + (|pg{-9/2}{+2}){-6+}(|ng{-9/2}{+-1}) (1988Ba11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
S$9.6 (1983Ka18); 8.9 (1981Cr02); 3.81, 4.01 (1980Ho18); 5.1 (1978An19); 8.5 (quoted by 1978An19 from Kallne et al., Gustaf Werner Inst. Rept. May 1975, at E(p)=185 MeV); 4.1, 4.8, 5.5 (1975Ro27); 9.5 (1973Ta07); 5.9, 6.8 (1971Ma58); 9.6 (1968Ba31). S=3.0 to 6.2 (for E(p)=22.9 to 185, 1984Al05). See 1984Al05 and 1983Ko23 for details of S factors vs E(p) (from 22.9 to 185 MeV) calculated with four different potential parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$595 (1991Du01), 590 {I20} (1968Ta07). 
S$1.2 (1983Ka18); 0.75 (1981Cr02); 0.98, 1.31 (1980Ho18); 0.99 (1978An19); 2.3 (quoted by 1978An19 from Kallne et al., Gustaf Werner Inst. Rept. May 1975, at E(p)=185 MeV); 2.1 (1975Ro27); 1.7, 2.1 (1973Ta07); 1.4 (1971Ma58); 1.7 (1968Ba31). S=0.4 to 1.3 (for E(p)=22.9 to 185, 1984Al05). See 1984Al05 and 1983Ko23 for details of S factors vs E(p) (from 22.9 to 185 MeV) calculated with four different potential parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$1.1E3 (1991Du01), 1090 {I20} (1968Ta07) 
S$2.1 (1983Ka18); 1.20 (1981Cr04); 2.73, 2.30 (1980Ho18); 2.3 (1978An19); 6.5 (quoted by 1978An19 from Kallne et al., Gustaf Werner Inst. Rept. May 1975, at E(p)=185 MeV); 3.1 (1975Ro27); 2.7, 2.2, 2.4 (1973Ta07); 1.4, 2.1 (1971Ma58), 2.4 (1968Ba31). S=0.8 to 1.8 (for E(p)=22.9 to 185, 1984Al05). See 1984Al05 and 1983Ko23 for details of S factors vs E(p) (from 22.9 to 185 MeV) calculated with four different potential parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$1460 (1991Du01), 1450 {I20} (1968Ta07) 
Contribution from 1520, (9/2)+ has been subtracted 
S$3.5 (1983Ka18) with |?20% contribution from 1520 level; 2.9 (1981Cr02); 1.5 (1978An19); 3.1 (quoted by 1978An19 from Kallne et al., Gustaf Werner Inst. Rept. May 1975, at E(p)=185 MeV); 2.9 (1975Ro27); 3.5, 4.0 (1973Ta07); 3.0 (1968Ba31). S=1.1 to 1.9 (for E(p)=22.9 to 185, 1984Al05). See 1984Al05 for details of S factors vs E(p) (from 22.9 to 185 MeV) calculated with four different potential parameters 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
E,L,S$from 1968Ba31. 
Not listed by 1991Du01, but the authors corrected the intensity of 1460 peak by subtracting contribution from 1513 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$1870 (1991Du01), 1860 {I20} (1968Ta07) 
S$0.53 (1983Ka18), 0.40 (1968Ba31), 0.42, 0.62 (1973Ta07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-&9/2+
level_comment:
E$2780 {I50} (1991Du01) 
S$0.29 for 2750, g{-9/2} (1983Ka18), 0.41 (1973Ta07) for g{-9/2} 
J$7/2+ suggested from Adopted Levels for L=4 component 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 78.380 h {I60}, 78.315 h {I30}, 78.341 h {I30}, and 78.332 h {I35} measured with the ionization chamber, 78.341 h {I61} and 78.324 h {I57} with the HPGe detector (2018Ga04). Units of min in Table 1 appear to be a typo. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from LWM method using 78.366 h {I35} from ionization chamber measurements and 78.375 h {I73} from 909|g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from ionization chamber measurements (2022Ko02) 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+89}Zr in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from delayed coincidence in {+90}Zr(p,p'e). Other: 62 ns {I4} (1959Kl46) 
J$E0 1760.7 transition to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from DSA measurements following projectile Coulomb excitation using {+90}Zr (2000Ja11). Others: 87.0 fs {I28} from (e,e') Coulomb excitation (1984He02), 93 fs {I5} from nuclear resonance fluorescence (1972Me04), 82 fs {I+16-12} from Doppler-Shift Attenuation in {+89}Y(p,|g) (1993Sa38) and 86.6 fs {I+49-42} from {+90}Zr(n,n'|g) (2013Pe16). 
MOMM1$from Transient Field Integral Perturbed Angular Correlation (2000Ja11,2014StZZ) 
J$E2 2186|g to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from (n,n'|g) 
MOMM1$From Nuclear Magnetic Resonance on Oriented Nuclei (1987Ed02,1987Ra17,2014StZZ). 
J$E5 2319.0|g to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from measurement with metallic sample in (n,n'|g) (2013Pe16). Others: 69 fs {I13} from Coul. ex. in (e,e') (1984He02), 72 fs {I21} from nuclear resonance fluorescence (1974Me13), 96 fs {I+6-5} from Doppler-Shift Attenuation in {+89}Y(p,|g) (1993Sa38), and 97 fs {I14} from Doppler-Shift Attenuation in {+90}Zr(n,n'|g) (1993BeZL). 
J$E2 3308.1|g to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 125 ns {I6} from delayed coincidence in {+90}Nb |e decay (1964Lo02) and 134 ns {I4} from |g(t) (1977Ha49). 
MOME2$from time-differential Perturbed Angular Distribution (1977Ha49,1989Ra17,2014StZZ). 
MOMM1$from time-differential Perturbed Angular Distribution, corrected for diamagnetic shift and Knight shift (1985Ra09,1989Ra17,2014StZZ). 
J$E2 141.2|g to 6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 15.1 fs {I9} from Coul. ex. in (e,e') (1984He02), 19.0 fs {I27} from nuclear resonance fluorescence, |G{-|g0}/|G{-|g}=1 was assumed, 14 fs {I+6-4} from Doppler-Shift Attenuation in {+89}Y(p,|g) (1993Sa38), 10 fs {I3} from Doppler-Shift Attenuation in 90Zr(n,n'|g) (1993BeZL) and 24 fs {I5} from DSA measurements in (n,n'|g) (2003Ga23) 
J$E2 3842|g to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from L(p,t)=4. Suggested to be the 4+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
J$shape of excitation function in (n,n'|g) consistent with J=4 or 5; L({+3}He,|a)=(4) and suggested to be the 5+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from L(p,t)=6; suggested to be the 6+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$shape of excitation function in (n,n'|g) consistent with J=5; ssuggested to be the 3+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet in ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$E2 4680.8|g to 0+; suggested to be the 2+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet in ({+3}He,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
J$E3 2741|g to 5-, E1 827.7|g to 6-; suggested to be the 7+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet in ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$Probable analog of {+90}Y(203). Not observed in (p,n) to the first excited state in {+89}Zr (1967Bl07). E(p)(lab)=5010 {I4}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM (2013Pe13). Value is the average of half-lives obtained from the metal and oxide scattering samples 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$likely contamination of the 2161.9|g from {+209}Bi makes the lifetime derived from DSAM using this transition suspect (2003Ga23) 
J$shape of excitation function consistent with J=4 (2003Ga23). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1,2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$positive part of the uncertainty is missing in Table II of 2003Ga23; estimated here from listed uncertainties for F(|t) value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$unresolved doublet (1983Va03). 
L$L=5 from 1968Di05. 1983Va03 report L=2, |bR=0.23, but state that L=2 alone cannot reproduce the |s(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$suggested to be the 4+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet (1981Fu10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$suggested to be the 5+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet (1981Fu10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$unresolved doublet (1983Va03). 
L$L=2 from 1968Di05. 1983Va03 report L=6, |bR=0.39. 
E$the 6+ state is suggested to belong to the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet (1981Fu10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$suggested to be the 3+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet (1981Fu10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$suggested to be the 7+ member of the configuration=((|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}(|n d{-5/2})) multiplet (1981Fu10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$%EWSR=75 {I9} (ISGMR) 
E,J,T$from 2018Gu05 
E$other: 16550 {I50} (2016Gu13) 
T$other: 4.2 MeV {I3} (2016Gu13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.066 {I6} ({+6}Li,{+6}Li') (1993Ho03); B(E2)|^=0.043 {I9}, ({+17}O,{+17}O') (1993Li24), B(E2)|^=0.059 {I+2-6} ({+6}Li,{+6}Li') (2010Kr01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$B(E3)|^=0.027 {I5}, ({+17}O,{+17}O')(1993Li24) ; B(E2)|^=0.086 {I+2 -9} ({+6}Li,{+6}Li')(2010Kr01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$cross section best reproduced by a calculation which considers only the Coulomb excitation contribution. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$excitation cross section measurements suggest that other sizable decay branches (apart from the observed 839|g and 4681|g) might exist from this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$cross section not well reproduced by DWBA calculation using standard deformed potential model, better agreement obtained when nuclear contribution is calculated from a microscopic form factor. 
E$dominant isoscalar component, exhausts 2.17% of the isoscalar dipole energy weighted sum rule strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$%ISEWSR=2.7 {I3} for |a; %ISEWSR=2.4 {I3} for protons. Both values read by compiler from graph in Figure 3 of 2021Cr01 for SGII interaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}: From measured mean lifetime {|t}=4.2 ps 4 (2022Pe15) by fitting the Decay Curve and performing the Differential Decay Curve Method (DDCM) using a Total Kinetic Energy Loss (TKEL) condition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}: From measured mean lifetime {|t}=18 ps +5-8 (2022Pe15) by fitting the Decay Curve and performing the Differential Decay Curve Method (DDCM) using a Total Kinetic Energy Loss (TKEL) condition. Systematic uncertainty was taken into account when having contaminated transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E,T$using correction factor from TAMU. Other: E=16.7 MeV {I2}, |G=4.4 MeV {I2} using correction factor from RCNP. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>(90,91)=0.096 {I11} (1988GaZS), 0.137 {I16} (1999GaZX); from LASER resonance fluorescence. 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.2844 fm {I10} (2004An14). Other: 4.33 (2005Bi25; read by evaluator from fig. 2). 
J J=5/2 from NMR (1957Br26); L(d,p)=2. 
MOMM1 From NMR (2011StZZ and 1989Ra17, from 1957Br26). 
MOME2 From 2000Ke03 and 2011StZZ, based on nuclear quadrupole coupling constants for ZrO and ZrS (1999Be77, molecular hfs) and quasirelativistic Douglas-Kroll calculations. Others: -0.206 {I10} from atomic beam NMR (1989Ra17, no polarization correction; datum of 1978Bu12 revised to -0.21 {I2} by 2011StZZ); -0.23 {I2} (1998Bo35, quasi-free of Sternheimer correction, atomic hfs); (-)0.257 {I13} (1993Yo11, atomic hfs). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(p,d)=0. 
T from DSAM in (|a,n|g). Other T{-1/2}: 0.17 ps {I+6-5} from DSAM in ({+13}C,{+12}C|g); 0.8 ps {I4} from B(E2)|^=0.009 {I4} in Coulomb excitation. 
|b{-2}=0.21 {I3} from (n,n'), 0.16 from (|a,|a'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(p,d)=2; vector analyzing power in (pol p,d). 
T weighted average of 0.19 ps {I+11-8} from DSAM in ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 0.35 ps {I11} from |G=1.3|*10{+-3} eV {I4} in (|g,|g'), 0.32 ps {I10} from DSAM in (|a,n|g) and 0.34 {I+4-3} from DSAM in (n,n'|g). (the unweighted average is 0.30 ps {I4}) 
|b{-2}=0.076 {I16} from (n,n'), 0.05 from (|a,|a'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=4; vector analyzing power in (pol d,p). 
T from |G=6.0|*10{+-3} eV {I8} in (|g,|g'). Others: 170 fs {I70} from DSAM in (|a,n|g), 73 fs {I+5-4} from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 
|b{-2}=0.103 {I12} from (n,n'), 0.08 from (|a,|a'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=2; vector analyzing power in (pol d,p). 
T from |G=41|*10{+-3} eV {I4} in (|g,|g'). Other T{-1/2}: <21 fs from DSAM in ({+13}C,{+12}C|g); 0.07 ps {I4} from DSAM in (|a,n|g); 11.8 fs {I14} from DSAM in (n,n'|g) (statistical uncertainty only). 
|b{-2}=0.082 {I11} from (n,n'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(p,d)=4; stretched (E2) |g to 5/2+. 
T from |G=3.8|*10{+-3} eV {I5} in (|g,|g'). Others: 0.24 ps {I7} from DSAM in (|a,n|g); 114 fs {I+12-10} from DSAM in (n,n'|g) (statistical uncertainty only). 
|b{-2}=0.052 {I7} from (n,n'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=5; L({+16}O,{+15}O)=(6) (J|p=1/2- ejectile); (octupole) transition to 5/2+. 
T from Doppler-shift attenuation observed in ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Note, however, that B(E3)(W.u.)(2170|g) will violate RUL, unless T{-1/2}>105 ps. 
|b{-3}=0.180 {I15} from (n,n'). Other: (|a,|a'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J L(p,p')=5; |g to 5/2+; 713|g from L(p,d)=4 level at 2902. 3/2+ and 5/2+ favored by Hauser-Feshbach analysis of (n,n'|g) (1974Gl06) and (|a,n|g) (1971Gl06), respectively. 
T 0.9 ps {I9} from |G=0.5|*10{+-3} eV {I5} from (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=4; D(+Q) |g to 5/2+ from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). Supported by J=7/2 from analyzing power in (pol d,p). 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 0.41 ps {I22} from |G=1.1|*10{+-3} eV {I6} from (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)-
level_comment:
J L(p,p')=5 for 5/2+ target; |DJ=0,1 90|g to (11/2)- 2170; 597|g from (13/2)+ 2857; (M1) 28|g from J|<15/2 {I2288}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1 from TDPAD in (|a,n|g) (1989Ra17 and 2011StZZ, from 1976Ba02). 
T from DPAD in (|a,n|g). Other T{-1/2}: |?35 ns from ({+6}Li,2np|g). 
J L(p,p')=5 on 5/2+ target; (M1) 28|g to J|<(13/2) 2260; |DJ=0,1 859|g from (17/2)+ 3147 level. |m supports configuration=(((|p p{-1/2})(|p g{-9/2}))5-~#(|n d{-5/2})). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,d')=(4); L(p,p')=3+5?; 1/2,3/2,5/2+ if primary |g from 1/2+ in (n,|g); 7/2- from Hauser-Feshbach analysis of (|a,n|g), but fit to data is poor; |g to 5/2+ g.s. 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 0.0702 ps {I11}, 0.0936 ps {I14} if J=5/2, 7/2, respectively; from ((2J+1)/(2J(g.s.)+1))*|G{-0}{+2}/|G=6.5|*10{+-3} eV {I1} in (|g,|g'), assuming |G{-0}/|G=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=0. 
T 
T from Doppler-shift attenuation observed in ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Other: 0.19 ps {I14} from |G=2.4|*10{+-3} eV {I18} from (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(p,p')=3; fed by primary |g from 1/2+ in (n,|g) E=thermal; |g to 5/2+. 
T 84 fs {I21} if |G=5.4|*10{+-3} eV {I14} from (|g,|g'). Other: 73 fs {I+25-17} from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 
|b{-3}|?0.21 from (|a,|a'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=1; |g to 5/2+. Supported by Hauser-Feshbach analysis in (|a,n|g). 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 0.08 ps {I4} if |G=6|*10{+-3} eV {I3} from (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(p,p')=3; D(+Q) |g to 5/2+; L(d,p)=(1); . 3/2- from Hauser-Feshbach analysis of (|a,n|g), but J=5/2 or 7/2 also appears possible. 
T if |G=18|*10{+-3} eV {I3} from (|g,|g'). Other: 22 fs {I+6-5} from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(p,p')=3; L(d,p)=(3); possible 732|g to 3/2+ 2042. However, 3/2- favored by Hauser-Feshbach analysis of (|a,n|g). 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 0.033 ps {I24} if J=5/2; from ((2J+1)/(2J(g.s.)+1))*|G{-0}{+2}/|G=4|*10{+-3} eV {I3} in (|g,|g'), assuming |G{-0}/|G=0.54. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 771|g to 3/2+ 2042; possible 416|g (not pure E2) to (9/2)- 2395; strong 2811|g branch to 5/2+ g.s. However, 9/2- favored in Hauser-Feshbach analysis from (|a,n|g), although J=5/2 or 7/2 also seem possible and (5/2+) is favored in (pol d,p). 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: |?11 fs if J=7/2; from ((2J+1)/(2J(g.s.)+1))*|G{-0}{+2}/|G=23|*10{+-3} eV {I4} in (|g,|g'), assuming |G{-0}/|G|?0.65. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
E weighted average of 2813 {I4} from (d,d') and 2805 {I5} from (p,p'). 
J L=3 from (p,p'0 on 5/2+ target. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J L(p,p')=4; E2 726|g to (9/2)+ 2131; 570|g to (15/2)- 2288. 
T from |g|g coin resolving time in ({+6}Li,2np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=2; vector analyzing power in (pol d,p). L(d,d')=(3) is in conflict with this assignment. 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(p,d)=4. 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 76 fs {I29}, 100 fs {I40} if J=7/2, 9/2, respectively; from ((2J+1)/(2J(g.s.)+1))*|G{-0}{+2}/|G=8|*10{+-3} eV {I3} in (|g,|g'), assuming |G{-0}/|G=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J |DJ=2 E2 290|g to (13/2)+ 2857; 859|g to (15/2)- 2288. 
T from |g|g coin resolving time in ({+6}Li,2np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T from {+6}Li-|g(t) in ({+6}Li,2np|g). Other: T{-1/2}=3.6 |ms {I1} (1985Ra09). 
MOMM1 From DPAD (1989Ra17 and 2011StZZ, from 1982RaZR); relative to |m({+90}Zr,3589). 
MOME2 From DPAD (1989Ra17 and 2011StZZ, from 1985Ra09); relative to {+91}Zr(g.s.), no polarization correction included. 
J isomeric state expected with configuration=((|p 1g{-9/2}){+2}(|n 2d{-5/2}))21/2+ (1976Br14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 0.3 ps {I9} if |G=1.5|*10{+-3} eV {I45} from (|g,|g'). 
J L=1 in (p,d) and (d,t); |g to 5/2+. L=(2) in (p,p') and (d,d') inconsistent with this assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
J L(p,d)=4. 
T 0.024 ps {I9}, 0.030 ps {I12} if J=7/2, 9/2, respectively; from ((2J+1)/(2J(g.s.)+1))*|G{-0}{+2}/|G=25|*10{+-3} eV {I9} in (|g,|g'), assuming |G{-0}/|G=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
J L(d,t)=2 for 4007 and/or 4024 levels; L=2 is inconsistent with adopted J(4007), suggesting it applies to the 4024 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=1; fed by primary |g from 1/2+ in (n,|g) E=thermal. 
T if |G=11|*10{+-2} eV {I5} from (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=2. However, L(d,d')=(3) and L(p,d)=1 are in conflict with this assignment, suggesting a possible multiplet at this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2-)
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=0,1. Excitation in (|g,|g'). 
T 3.0 fs {I18}, 6 fs {I3} if J=1/2, 3/2, respectively; from ((2J+1)/(2J(g.s.)+1))*|G{-0}{+2}/|G=50|*10{+-3} eV {I30} in (|g,|g'), assuming |G{-0}/|G=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
3/2- from two-point |g excit suggested in 1971Gl06, but data do not appear to exclude J=5/2 or 7/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
9/2- from two-point |g excit suggested by 1971Gl06, but data do not appear to exclude J=7/2 or possibly 5/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 1212 (2013Sh02), 1204 (1972Gr12), 1201 (1970Bi03), 1210 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.83 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 1476 (2013Sh02), 1468 (1972Gr12), 1459 (1970Bi03), 1480 (1963Co10) 
C{+2}S=0.018 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 1877 (2013Sh02), 1883 (1972Gr12), 1871 (1970Bi03), 1890 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.078 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2048 (2013Sh02), 2040 (1972Gr12), 2031 (1970Bi03), 2060 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.63 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2131 (2013Sh02), 2127 (1972Gr12), 2133 in table 6 of 1976Bl11. 
Weakly-populated with inconclusive |s(|q) in (d,p) and absent in (|a,{+3}He), so 2013Sh02 suggest that level may Be populated via an indirect process. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2203 (2013Sh02), 2195 (1972Gr12), 2186 (1970Bi03), 2210 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.34 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2559 (2013Sh02), 2554 (1972Gr12), 2541 (1970Bi03), 2580 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.24 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2690 (2013Sh02), 2693 (1972Gr12), 2681 (1970Bi03). 
L 1 from 2013Sh02 but (3) from 1976Bl11, (2) from 1972Gr12. 
C{+2}S=0.005, 0.003 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2813 (2013Sh02), 2807 (1972Gr12), 2792 (1970Bi03). 
L 2 from 2013Sh02 and 1972Gr12 but L=3 from 1976Bl11. 
C{+2}S=0.11 (2013Sh02) if J|p=3/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2875 (2013Sh02), 2869 (1972Gr12), 2853 (1970Bi03). 2880 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.21 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 2928 {I8} (2013Sh02), 2926 (1972Gr12). 
L from 2013Sh02; L=(3) from 1972Gr12. 
C{+2}S=0.018 (2013Sh02) if J|p=3/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 3291 (2013Sh02), 3284 (1972Gr12), 3270 (1970Bi03), other E: 3300 (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.15 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 3682 (2013Sh02), 3675 (1972Gr12). 3700, presumably for multiplet (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.10 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Other E: 3850 (2013Sh02), 3841 (1972Gr12), 3824 (1970Bi03). 3890 for multiplet with L=3 not adopted (1963Co10). 
C{+2}S=0.019 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
Observed but not analyzed because this is probably a multiplet of levels whose L values are unknown (1973Ra18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S=0.41 for 11/2- component if S=0.48 is assumed for the 7/2+ component (as determined by 1970Bi02 in their (d,p) study). 
Other E: 2171 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S=0.028 for 11/2- component if S=0.11 is assumed for the 3/2+ component (as determined by 1970Bi02 in their (d,p) study). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S=0.085 for 11/2- component if S=0.045 is assumed for the 3/2+ component (as determined by 1970Bi02 in their (d,p) study). 
Other E: 3917 (2013Sh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E probable multiplet dominated by known h{-11/2} (2170 and 4070) and g{-7/2} (2201 and 3469) states (1990Fo04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E probably arises from i{-13/2} orbital excitations, based on selectivity of this reaction for transfer to high spin orbitals (1990Fo04). May be same structure as observed in (|a,{+3}He) reaction. Not included in Adopted Levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 5/2+ from |g excit (1974Gl06). 
T 344 fs {I+58-42} (metal), 344 fs {I+68-48} (oxide) (2013Pe16); 1466|g and E(n)=2.0 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 7/2+,9/2+ from |g excit (1974Gl06). 
T 76 fs {I6} (metal), 69 fs {I+6-5} (oxide) (2013Pe16); 1882|g and E(n)=2.0 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 3/2+ from |g excit (1974Gl06). 
T 11.1 fs {I21} (metal), 11.8 fs {I+21-14} (oxide) (2013Pe16); 2042|g and E(n)=2.5 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J (9/2+) from |g excit (1974Gl06). 
T 115 fs {I+17-13} (metal), 112 fs {I+17-13} (oxide) (2013Pe16); 2132|g and E(n)=2.5 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2+ preferred over 7/2+ in |g excit (1974Gl06). 
T 344 fs {I+58-42} (metal), 344 fs {I+68-48} (oxide) (2013Pe16). 2201|g and E(n)=2.5 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Level not adopted; the 726|g tentatively deexciting it in (n,n'|g) probably deexcites the adopted 2857 level, absent in 1979Av02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L 4 from 1968Ba31 (|s(|q) not shown); (5) from 1976Bl11, but fit is very poor for both L=5 and L=4. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S 0.028 if J|p=1/2-. However, this may be a doublet since two levels are adopted in the vicinity of this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,J,T from Adopted Levels. 
No deexcitation |g reported by 2006ReZZ; E|g presumably too low to be observed in that experiment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E shown as 4068 by 2006ReZZ because order of 901|g-1545|g cascade was uncertain and tentatively reversed in their level scheme. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E shown as 3472 by 2006ReZZ because order of 2141|g-305|g cascade was uncertain and tentatively reversed in their level scheme. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=3.8612 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.0780 eV 23, |G{-n}=10.8 eV 5, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0770 eV 23 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=4.00832 {I6} 
|G{-|g}=0.250 eV 22, |G{-n}=0.089 eV 4, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.130 eV 5 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=7.2603 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.150 eV 5, |G{-n}=3.20 eV 19, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.287 eV 9 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 7.251 {I5} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=8.8551 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.218 eV 8, |G{-n}=6.0 eV 4, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.211 eV 7 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=9.60204 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.44 eV 4, |G{-n}=0.0200 eV 16, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0190 eV 14 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=12.20802 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.241 eV 20, |G{-n}=0.0070 eV 6, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0067 eV 6 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=12.39980 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.081 eV 8, |G{-n}=0.049 eV 4, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0310 eV 20 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=12.44288 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.057 eV 5, |G{-n}=0.046 eV 4, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0260 eV 17 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=13.365 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.068 eV 5, |G{-n}=30 eV 3, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0.068 eV 5 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=13.44390 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.053 eV 4, |G{-n}=53 eV 5, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.053 eV 5 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=16.894 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.099 eV 7, g|G{-n}=1.46 eV 15, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.092 eV 6 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=16.92958 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.279 eV 26, |G{-n}=0.0260 eV 25. |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0240 eV 20 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=16.9792 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.246 eV 21, |G{-n}=0.020 eV 2, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0.0180 eV 17 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=17.402 {I20} 
|G{-|g}=0.162 eV 12, |G{-n}=241 eV 18, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.162 eV 12 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 17.313 {I15} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=19.07930 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.0200 eV 18, |G{-n}=0.105 eV 11. |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0170 eV 13 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=19.098 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.11 eV 1, |G{-n}=0.70 eV 7, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.097 eV 7 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=19.713 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.270 eV 15, |G{-n}=13.0 eV 12, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.267 eV 15 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 19.685 {I10} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=26.469 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.065 eV 6, |G{-n}=1.30 eV 13, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.124 eV 10 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=26.538 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.210 eV 13, |G{-n}=5.8 eV 6, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.410 eV 25 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=28.827 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.150 eV 15, |G{-n}=1.10 eV 11, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.270 eV 24 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=35.356 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.59 eV 4, |G{-n}=38 eV 4, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.58 eV 4 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=39.507 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.180 eV 15, |G{-n}=1.30 eV 13, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.329 eV 24 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 39.54 {I2} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=40.40 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.160 eV 15, |G{-n}=58 eV 6, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.162 eV 15 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=41.39 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.98 eV 5, |G{-n}=236 eV 17, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=1.96 eV 11 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=42.0699 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.040 eV 4, |G{-n}=0.20 eV 2, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.068 eV 6 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=42.21 {I6} 
|G{-|g}=0.200 eV 19, |G{-n}=285 eV 28, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.203 eV 19 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=42.455 {I6} 
|G{-|g}=0.071 eV 7, |G{-n}=0.49 eV 5, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.062 eV 5 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=42.64 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.200 eV 17, |G{-n}=116 eV 11, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.200 eV 17 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=44.822 {I8} 
|G{-|g}=0.310 eV 22, |G{-n}=83 eV 8, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.63 eV 5 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 44.70 {I3} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=53.264 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.0250 eV 25, |G{-n}=0.81 eV 8, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0250 eV 24 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 53.38 {I3} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=53.371 {I8} 
|G{-|g}=0.094 eV 9, |G{-n}=1.50 eV 15, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.088 eV 8 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 53.45 {I5} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=53.672 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.190 eV 19, |G{-n}=0.48 eV 5, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.134 eV 10 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 53.77 {I5} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=54.353 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.240 eV 24, |G{-n}=0.098 eV 10, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.070 eV 5 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=54.546 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.250 eV 25, |G{-n}=0.22 eV 2, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.117 eV 8 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=55.80 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.190 eV 18, |G{-n}=64 eV 6, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.192 eV 18 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=56.52 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.250 eV 22, |G{-n}=41 eV 4, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.244 eV 21 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 56.43 {I3} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=57.790 {I4} 
|G{-|g}/|G=0.42 eV 4, |G{-n}=0.65 eV 6, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.257 eV 18 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=58.311 {I8} 
|G{-|g}/|G=0.180 eV 16, |G{-n}=9.4 eV 9, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.174 eV 15 (2008Ta04). Other E(res): 58.18 {I4} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=61.9000 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.200 eV 20, g|G{-n}=0.70 eV 7, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.313 eV 25 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=62.410 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.150 eV 15, |G{-n}=1.0 eV 1, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.128 eV 11 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=63.9419 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.160 eV 16, |G{-n}=0.70 eV 7, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.133 eV 11 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=64.95 {I6} 
|G{-|g}=0.079 eV 8, |G{-n}=127 eV 13, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.079 eV 8 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=65.18 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.47 eV 4, g|G{-n}=129 eV 13, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.94 eV 7 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=65.362 {I2} 
|G{-|g}=0.30 eV 3, |G{-n}=0.70 eV 7, |G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.212 eV 16 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2
level_comment:
$E(RES)(LAB)=68.591 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.43 eV 4, g|G{-n}=5.5 eV 5, g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G=0.80 eV 7 (2008Ta04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}{+2}/|G (eV)=46|*10{+-3} {I18} 
g|G{-0}{+2}/|G: after subtraction of the contribution from the 3684 level in {+13}C. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>(92,90)=0.224 {I26} (1999GaZX), 0.224 {I25} (1988GaZS); |D<r{+2}>(92,94)=0.170 {I19} (1988GaZS). 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.3057 fm {I9} (2004An14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (t,p), (p,t) and p,d,t,{+3}He,|a scattering. |m implies dominant role of d{-5/2} neutrons in wavefunction of this state (1999Ja13). 
T from B(E2)=0.080 {I6} (Coulomb excitation). 
MOMM1 from measured g-factor=-0.180 {I10} from |g(|q,H,t) in Coulomb excitation. Other |m: -0.06 {I10} from transient field integral PAC (1989Ra17, from 1980Ha31), assuming T{-1/2}=4.85 ps; -0.36 {I4} (2008We07; transient field). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 448|g-934|g(|q) in {+92}Y |b{+-} decay indicates a 0-2-0 cascade; L=0 in (t,p) and (p,t). 
T from {+92}Y |b{+-} decay. Other: 85 ps {I15} from (p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from measured g-factor=-0.50 {I11} from |g(|q,H,t) in Coulomb excitation. 
J L=4 in (t,p), (p,t), (p,p'), (t,t'), (|a,|a'). |m implies dominant role of d{-5/2} neutrons in wavefunction of this state (1999Ja13). 
T from |g|g(t), {+92}Y |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (p,t), (p,p'), (t,t'), (|a,|a'), ({+3}He,{+3}He'), (t,p). 
MOMM1 From measured g-factor in Coulomb excitation (transient field). 
Level exhibits structure expected for a mixed symmetry one-phonon Q excitation (2002We15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L=3 in (t,p), (p,t), (p,p'), (d,d'), (t,t'), ({+3}He,{+3}He'), (|a,|a'). 
For summary of B(E3)|^ data, see 1989Sp01; recommended value is 0.067 {I22} based on b{-3} from angular distribution in (p,p'). This corresponds to 4.4% {I15} of energy-weighted E3 sum rule. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L=4 in (t,p) and (|a,|a'). Note: evaluator assumes J=1,3 from (n,n') for 2360 {I20} level to be in error; alternatively, an additional level may exist at that energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J L=5 in (t,p), (p,p'), (|a,|a') and analyzing power in (pol p,p') (1979De11). See comment on J(2486 level) in (n,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 404|g and 258|g to 3- 2340 and 5- 2486, respectively; L(d,{+3}He)=1. If the 2486 and 2744 states are treated as members of the (p{-1/2},g{-9/2}) doublet, they exhaust the p{-1/2} pickup strength in (d,{+3}He). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L=4 in (t,p), (|a,|a'); however, if reported L(p,p')=(2) is correct, a (2+) level also must exist at approximately this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 2105|g to 2+ 934; D(+Q) 700|g to 3- 2340; 296|g to 4- 2744; J=3 from 700|g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=(3+5) for 5/2+ target; D(+Q) 1696|g to 4+ 1496, but J=5 requires |d(D,Q)=+0.36 {I5} and J=3 requires |d=-0.41 to -1.92 to 4+ level, violating RUL if |p=-. 
E,J if (d,p), (|a,{+3}He) and (n,n'|g) excite same state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J stretched Q transition to 6+ 2958 in ({+7}Li,2np|g). 
T from recoil-distance measurements in {+48}Ca({+48}Ca,4n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E values from (p,p') (1966St15) and E(t,p) are, respectively, 10-20 keV and 5-10 keV low. 
J E2(+M3) 2529|g to 2+ 934; L(t,p)=(4); 1968|g to 4+ 1495. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
2694|g to 2+ 934; 885|g to 4- 2744; 2133|g to 4+ 1495; L(t,p)=2+(4) for 3628+3640 doublet so this is presumed to be the L=(4) component. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 2706|g to 2+ 934; 1301|g to 3- 2340; L(t,p)=2+(4) for 3628+3640 doublet, with L=(4) component associated with 3628 level on basis of that level's |g decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J crossover 619|g to (7-) 3380 in ({+24}Mg,F|g); D |DJ=1 179|g to (8-) 3819 in {+88}Sr({+7}Li,2np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17,18+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J D,E2 593|g feeds (16+) 7446. (17-) suggested in ({+48}Ca,4n|g), but (18+) suggested in ({+13}C,3n|g). 
T from recoil-distance data, {+48}Ca({+48}Ca,4n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.)=0.66 {I4} (2010Sc32) 
B(E2)/B(E2)(934 level)=15.0 {I13} (2009ScZV). 
Predominantly a one-phonon state; form factor closely resembles that for 934, 2+ level (2010Sc32). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J not J=2 from 1414|g(|q); not J=4 from 1975|g(|q) and 843|g(|q) (2005Fr17); M1+E2 transitions to 2+ and 4+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J |p=- preferred based on small |d values for 700|g and 2105|g. J=4 excluded by 2105|g(|q); J=3 from 700|g(|q) (2005Fr17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J=2 from |g(|q) for 2518|g, 1957|g and 1605|g, but 1113|g(|q) shows slight preference for J=3 (2005Fr17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
|b{-02}: 0.25 (nuclear), 0.104-0.108 (charge). |b{-22}: 0.95 (nuclear), 0.0-0.41 (charge). (1990Ta14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G From transient field. Other g: -0.18 {I2} (2008We07, transient field). 
B(E2) from 1981Yo07. Other data: B(E2)({+92}Zr)/B(E2)({+94}Zr,920-level)=1.40 {I14} (1969Ga25); B(E2)=0.094 {I19} (1963Al31), 0.079 {I20} (1969Ga25). 
T from B(E2)=0.080 {I6}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (18+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E an alternative value of 9131 is possible because the order of 594|g and 1683|g was not established; however, the 1683|g appears to Be the weaker of the two. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)(second 2+ to 0+)=3.31 {I10} (2013Sc01) 
$Other B(E2)(W.u.)= 3.32 {I27} from PWBA analysis (2013Sc01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$covers a region between 12-35 MeV comprised mainly of high-energy octupole resonance (HEOR); contribution from low-energy octupole resonance (LEOR) in the range of about 10-15 MeV is low 
T$rms width 
$%E3 EWSR=69 {I9} for ISGOR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=1.12 ps {I+19-13} (stat) {I22} (syst) Doppler shift line-shape analysis (2017Su22). Authors point out that side-feeding lifetime for this level is of the same order of magnitude 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J |DJ=2, yes shape for |b spectrum in {+93}Y |b{+-} decay to {+93}Zr (1959Kn38); L(d,p)=2. J|p({+93}Y)=1/2-,3/2- from L(d,{+3}He)=1. Hence, J|p({+93}Y)=1/2-, J|p({+93}Zr)=5/2+. 
T weighted average of 1.53|*10{+6} y 10 (1972FlZM) and 1.64|*10{+6} y 6 (2010Ca01). Others: 1.13|*10{+6} y 11 (2010Ya01; reason for discrepancy not known); 1950St90 (1.5-8.5 |*10{+6} y). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (d,p); J=5/2 excluded by 679|g-267|g(|q) in {+93}Y |b{+-} decay. 
CONF |n(3s{-1/2})~#92ZR(0+) (2005Pa48). 
T |b|g and |g|g delayed coin (1968Pr11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J parentheses added by evaluator to J|p suggested from ({+28}Si,X|g), ({+31}P,X|g). 
CONF |n(2d{-5/2})~# {+92}Zr(2+) (2005Pa48). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2,5/2+)
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+; log| {Ift}=8.9 from 1/2-; the probable isobaric analog of this state (in {+93}Nb) has J|p=3/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E in {+173}Yb({+24}Mg,F|g), 2002Fo03 reported a 1655 {I13}/2+ level based on the reverse order of the 705|g-1334|g cascade. In {+176}Yb({+28}Si,X|g), the 1335|g is clearly stronger than the 705|g, so the evaluator adopts the placement that positions the 1335|g below the 705|g. 
J (13/2+) and (11/2-) proposed in ({+24}Mg,F|g) and ({+28}Si,X|g), respectively; the evaluator favors the former since it avoids the implication of M2 multipolarity for the 706|g from (15/2+,17/2+) 2990 level that would result from the level scheme in ({+28}Si,X|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J,T 1425|g to (9/2+) 950. J|p=(13/2-) suggested in ({+28}Si,X|g) but J|p=(11/2-) in ({+24}Mg,F|g). The former implies M2 multipolarity for the 1425|g and, if correct, the 2375 level should consequently exhibit T{-1/2}|>0.25 ns based on RUL; the evaluator considers (11/2-) to Be the more likely value. This may Be the 9/2-,11/2- 2363 level seen in (d,p); if so, J|p=(11/2)-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2+,17/2+)
level_comment:
J (15/2+) is proposed in ({+28}Si,X|g) but (17/2+) in ({+24}Mg,F|g); see also the comment on the 706|g. 504|g to (15/2-) 2486, 706|g to 2284. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+,21/2+)
level_comment:
275|g to (15/2+,17/2+) 2990. J|p=(17/2+) proposed in ({+28}Si,X|g) but (21/2+) in ({+24}Mg.(fragment)|g). If J=21/2, J(2990)=(17/2) is favored. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
J s-wave neutron capture by 0+ target. 
E cf. S(n)=6734.5 {I4} (2003Au03), 6735.9 {I23} (1977Ba33), 6733.0 {I11} (1972Gr23). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L from 1972BaZP and 1973Fa05. S'=0.042 in 1972BaZP, but peak is subject to contamination by strong (g.s.) proton group from {+94}Zr(d,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=2.01291 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.36 eV (2006MuZX); |G{-n}=0.0260 eV {I12} (2010Ta09, assuming the value (0.260 {I12})in footnote b of table II is misprinted); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.0443 eV {I11} (2010Ta09). Other |G{-n}: 0.0265 eV {I15} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=2.6894 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.115 eV {I2} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=25.2 eV {I3} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.1150 eV {I20} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=4.1212 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.250 eV {I4} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=3.0 eV {I2} (2006MuZX); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.460 eV {I6} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=4.6396 {I5} 
|G{-|g}=0.100 eV {I3} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=15.2 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.100 eV {I3} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=5.0457 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.165 eV {I4} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=1.07 {I7} eV (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.142 eV {I3} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=6.6389 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.224 eV {I5} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=0.98 {I4} eV (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.363 eV {I7} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=6.811 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.130 eV {I12} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=50 eV assumed by 2010Ta09 (cf. 73.0 eV {I5} (1976Bo31, 2006MuZX)); (2J+1)(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/2(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.132 eV {I12} (2010Ta09) (cf. 0.36 {I4} (1976Bo31, 2006MuZX)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=8.8450 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.110 eV {I6} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=4.00 eV {I15} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.107 eV {I5} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=9.1367 {I5} 
|G{-|g}=0.098 eV {I5} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=6.3 eV {I1} (2006MuZX); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.097 eV {I5} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=9.8210 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.085 eV {I4} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=1.4 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.160 eV {I7} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=11.9437 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.130 eV {I6} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=1.60 eV {I5} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.240 eV {I10} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=12.0131 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.200 eV {I10} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=9.0 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.195 eV {I10} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=13.0657 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.121 eV {I6} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=1.5 eV {I2} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.224 eV {I10} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=14.427 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.205 eV {I12} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=14.0 eV {I7} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.202 eV {I12} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=15.0279 {I8} 
J,L 2010Ta09 list J=3/2 and L=0, which are incompatible. Evaluator assumes L is misprinted and adopts L=1 from 1976Bo31 and 2006MuZX. 
|G{-|g}=0.057 eV {I5} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=0.25 {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.098 eV {I8} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=17.132 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.147 eV {I7} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=12.1 eV {I2} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.290 eV {I15} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=19.076 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.166 eV {I10} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=2.15 eV {I15} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.308 eV {I17} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=20.195 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.215 eV {I19} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=1.3 eV {I3} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.185 eV {I14} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=20.846 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.341 eV {I23} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=2.4 eV {I2} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.299 eV {I17} (2010Ta09). 
L,J L=0, J=1/2 is reported by 2010Ta09 but L=1, J=1/2 by 1976Bo31 and 2006MuZX; consequently, the evaluator does not adopt a parity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=21.977 {I1} 
|G{-|g}=0.237 eV {I18} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=2.8 eV {I3} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.218 eV {I15} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=23.114 {I10} 
|G{-|g}=0.150 eV {I14} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=108 eV {I3} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.150 eV {I14} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=25.665 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.077 eV {I15} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=2.5 eV {I5} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.075 eV {I14} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=26.776 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.120 eV {I12} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=1.15 eV {I25} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.220 eV {I21} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=27.327 {I5} 
|G{-|g}=0.200 eV {I24} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=22.5 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.198 eV {I24} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=28.098 {I6} 
|G{-|g}=0.068 eV {I14} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=12.5 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.14 eV {I3} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=28.167 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.28 eV {I4} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=6.0 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.26 eV {I3} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=30.398 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.073 eV {I17} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=4.6 eV {I7} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.072 eV {I17} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=30.932 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.241 eV {I21} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=12.0 eV {I5} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.47 eV {I4} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=32.490 {I3} 
|G{-|g}=0.310 eV {I23} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=11.5 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.60 eV {I4} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=33.094 {I9} 
|G{-|g}=0.100 eV {I11} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=12.0 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.100 eV {I11} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=35.035 {I20} 
|G{-|g}=0.290 eV {I19} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=65 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.289 eV {I19} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=35.677 {I12} 
|G{-|g}=0.42 eV {I3} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=52 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.41 eV {I3} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=35.961 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.234 eV {I21} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=26.5 eV {I5} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.46 eV {I4} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=37.507 {I7} 
|G{-|g}=0.187 eV {I10} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=14 eV {I3} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.185 eV {I10} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=38.740 {I10} 
|G{-|g}=0.125 eV {I11} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=4.5 eV {I15} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.121 eV {I11} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=38.922 {I8} 
|G{-|g}=0.100 eV {I11} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=5 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.200 eV {I22} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=39.345 {I9} 
|G{-|g}=0.44 eV {I6} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=70 eV {I6} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.44 eV {I6} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=39.42 {I4} 
|G{-|g}=0.120 eV {I17} (2010Ta09); |G{-n}=73 eV {I6} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.120 eV {I17} (2010Ta09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=41.20 {I8} 
|G{-|g}=0.235 eV {I25} (2006MuZX); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.46 eV {I5} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=43.75 {I9} 
|G{-|g}=0.336 eV {I20} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=5 eV {I2} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.32 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=45.03 {I9} 
|G{-|g}=0.38 eV {I5} (2006MuZX); |G{-n}=105 eV {I8} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.37 eV {I5} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=45.71 {I9} 
|G{-|g}=0.30 eV {I5} (2006MuZX); |G{-n}=36 eV {I6} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.30 eV {I5} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=46.87 {I9} 
|G{-|g}=0.74 eV {I16} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=530 eV {I20} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=1.48 eV {I16} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=47.57 {I10} 
|G{-|g}=0.08 eV {I3} (2006MuZX); |G{-n}=120 eV {I8} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.08 eV {I3} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=49.28 {I10} 
g|G{-n}=12 eV {I4} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.24 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=49.8 {I1} 
g|G{-n}=11 eV {I4} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.65 eV {I8} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=52.65 {I11} 
|G{-|g}=0.09 eV {I3} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=175 eV {I20} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.09 eV {I3} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=53.50 {I11} 
g|G{-n}=15 eV {I6} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.30 eV {I5} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=54.50 {I11} 
g|G{-n}=2 eV {I1} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.27 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=55.60 {I11} 
g|G{-n}=20 eV {I5} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.18 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=56.15 {I11} 
|G{-|g}=0.07 eV {I3} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=90 eV {I15} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.07 eV {I3} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=58.15 {I12} 
g|G{-n}=45 eV {I8} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.12 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=60.94 {I12} 
|G{-|g}=0.26 eV {I3} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=150 eV {I16} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.51 eV {I6} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=62.65 {I13} 
|G{-|g}=0.177 eV {I20} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=40 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.18 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=63.42 {I13} 
|G{-|g}=0.45 eV {I5} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=160 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.89 eV {I10} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=67.45 {I13} 
|G{-|g}=0.44 eV {I3} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=28 eV {I8} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.43 eV {I6} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=69.14 {I14} 
|G{-|g}=0.328 eV {I25} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=28 eV {I8} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.33 eV {I5} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=72.75 {I15} 
g|G{-n}=42 eV {I8} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.38 eV {I6} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=80.75 {I16} 
g|G{-n}=60 eV {I15} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.36 eV {I6} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=83.00 {I17} 
|G{-|g}=0.22 eV {I3} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=220 eV {I30} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.43 eV {I6} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=83.40 {I17} 
g|G{-n}=125 eV {I20} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.19 eV {I4} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=84.70 {I17} 
|G{-|g}=0.48 eV {I6} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=410 eV {I30} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.96 eV {I12} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=89.49 {I18} 
|G{-|g}=0.74 eV {I13} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=1080 eV {I40} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=1.48 eV {I25} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: [3/2]-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=91.20 {I18} 
|G{-|g}=0.62 eV {I8} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=30 eV {I20} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.61 eV {I16} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=93.15 {I19} 
|G{-|g}=0.49 eV {I8} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=460 eV {I50} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.98 eV {I15} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=94.35 {I19} 
|G{-|g}=0.29 eV {I6} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=380 eV {I60} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.57 eV {I12} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=98.85 {I20} 
|G{-|g}=0.47 eV {I5} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=180 eV {I25} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.47 eV {I10} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=100.35 {I20} 
|G{-|g}=0.68 eV {I8} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=550 eV {I50} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=1.36 eV {I16} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=103.90 {I21} 
g|G{-n}=80 eV {I40} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.49 eV {I20} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=104.50 {I21} 
g|G{-n}=80 eV {I40} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.22 eV {I10} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=106.05 {I21} 
|G{-|g}=1.32 eV {I15} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=1840 eV {I80} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=2.6 eV {I3} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=111.40 {I22} 
|G{-|g}=0.06 eV {I4} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=300 eV {I60} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.13 eV {I7} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=113.22 {I23} 
|G{-|g}=0.44 eV {I9} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=320 eV {I60} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.89 eV {I18} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=115.65 {I23} 
g|G{-n}=20 eV {I10} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=0.13 eV {I7} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=119.00 {I24} 
|G{-|g}=0.95 eV {I5} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=1140 eV {I60} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=1.9 eV {I3} (1976Bo31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$E(n)(lab)=120.00 {I24} 
|G{-|g}=1.46 eV {I20} (2006MuZX); g|G{-n}=550 eV {I100} (1976Bo31); g(|G{-n}|G{-|g})/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g})=1.46 eV {I20} (2006MuZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
T$>1.9|*10{+19} y for {+94}Zr(g.s.) to {+94}Mo(g.s.) 2|n 2|b{+-} decay, T{-1/2}> 0.23|*10{+19} y for {+94}Zr(g.s.) to {+94}Mo(g.s.) neutrinoless 2|b{+-} decay. Other: T{-1/2}>1.3|*10{+19} y for {+94}Zr(g.s.) to {+94}Mo(2+) 2|b{+-} decay (1987No03) 
$|D<r{+2}>(fm{+2}): ({+92}Zr,{+94}Zr)=0.176 {i20} (1987Bo56), ({+94}Zr,{+96}Zr)=0.126 {i23} (1987Bo56), 0.117 {i14} (1988Ga26) all from measured isotopic shifts 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.3312 fm {I9} ( 2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$From 1999Ja13 from |g-ray angular distribution of recoil ions slowing down in polarized Gadolinium following Coulomb excitation. Other: |m=-0.52 {I12} (1989Ra17) |m=-0.14 {i14} (1978Ge19). Both values are from |g-ray angular distribution of recoil ions slowing down in polarized iron following Coulomb excitation. 
J$L(p,t)=2 
T$from B(E2) in Coulomb Excitation 
$|D<r{+2}>({+94}Zr,{+96}Zr) (fm{+2})=0.117 {i14} (1988Ga26) optical isotopic shift 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g's to 2+, |g from 4+, supported by Wolfenstein-Hauser-Feshbach calculations for (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from centroid shift of electron-|g(t) (shifts have been determined relative to the cyclotron repetition pulse and relative to prompt curves from other isotopes). More accurate than 0.320 ns {i21} from (p,p'|g) measured the slope of the |g(t)-curve relative to protons. (1970Co10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$L=1,3,4 with |b{-L}{+2}|*100=0.137 {i18}, 0.130 {i17}, 0.157 {i21}, respectively. 
J$adopted J|p is in conflict with the DWBA fit which favors L=1,3 or 4 but does not rule out 0. Authors suggest that a possible reason for discrepancy could be the multiple excitation through the 2+ level at 918. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$ previous value was 121 fs {I14} (2007El01) 
E$ mixed-symmetry state from strong M1 transition to first 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$ previous value was 127 fs {I+9-8} (2008El09) 
E$one phonon mixed-symmetry (ms) state with anomalous decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ from table I in 2003Pe16. Listed as 0.30 ps {+35-12} in table I of erratum. Previous value was 194 fs {I+28-23} (2008El09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ previous value was 113 fs {I+12-10} (2008El09) 
E,J$candidate two phonon mixed-symmetry (ms) state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$ previous value was 6.5 fs {I+23-21} (2008El09) 
E,J$candidate two phonon mixed-symmetry (ms) state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from table I in 2013Pe16. Other: 0.30 ps {I+35-12} in table I of erratum: Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) (2013) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$ B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 {I9} (2014Sc04) 
$B(E2)(second 2+)/B(E2)(first 2+)=0.789 {I43} (2014Sc04). Using B(E2)(W.u.)=4.9 {I11} for first 2+ from 2001Ra27 evaluation, 2014Sc04 obtain B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 {I9} for second 2+ state. This value is in agreement with DSAM result from 2013Pe16, but with earlier DSAM value from the same group reported in 2008El09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$for the 0|n+2|n decay mode of {+94}Zr double-beta decay to the first excited state of {+94}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.) using the Bayesian analysis method (2017Do04). The authors also report a lower-limit of 2.0|*10{+19} y for the sensitivity at 90% C.L. using the Feldman-Cousins method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$covers a region between 12-35 MeV comprised mainly of high-energy octupole resonance (HEOR); contribution from low-energy octupole resonance (LEOR) in the range of about 10-15 MeV is low 
T$rms width 
$%E3 EWSR=58 {I8} for ISGOR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$for the 0|n+2|n decay mode of {+94}Zr double-beta decay to the first excited state of {+94}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.) using the Bayesian analysis method (2018Do06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$%ISEWSR=1.0 {I15} for |a; %ISEWSR=1.05 {I15} for protons. Both values read by compiler from graph in Figure 3 of 2021Cr01 for Skl3 interaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$for the 0|n2|b decay mode of {+94}Zr to the ground state of {+94}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.). Others: > 3.8|*10{+18} y for 0|n2|b decay mode to the 871 keV level of {+94}Mo, > 2.4 |*10{+18} y for 2|n2|b decay mode to the ground state of {+94}Mo, > 1.9 |*10{+17} y for 2|n2|b decay mode to the 871 keV level of {+94}Mo (2023Be10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$for the (0|n+2|b) decay mode of {+94}Zr to the 871.1 keV first excited state of {+94}Mo. Bayesian analysis was performed to deduce the upper limit of decay rate |G{+|b|b} < 3.36|*10{+-21} year{+-1} and lower limit of T{-1/2} at 90% C.L. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$from the weighted average of the following 7 values: 63 d {i5} (1940Sa08), 65 d {i2} (1951BrZZ), 65.2 d {i10} (1953Co23), 65.1 d {i9} (1965Si16), 64.05 d {i2} (1976Ha51, with the published uncertainty divided by 3 to convert to 1|s), 64.030 d {i6} (1980Ho17), and 64.09 d {i10} (1983Wa26) with reduced-|h{+2}=0.72. The Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight, (LRSW) method (1985ZiZY,1992Ra09) gives this same result even though the 1980Ha17 value has a relative weight of 98.6%, because the set is consistent. Other values: 65.5 d {i2} (1965Fl02, omitted because it is inconsistent with the other values) and 67.8 (1945Po01). If the value from 1965Fl02 is included, the set is inconsistent and the LRSW method increases the uncertainty of the value of 1980Ho17 from 0.006 to 0.05 and the resulting average is 64.09 with a reduced-|h{+2} of 7.8. If one leaves the value of 1965Fl02 in the data set, the discrepancy can be dealt with by the RAJEVAL method (1992Ra08) which increase its uncertainty from 0.2 to 0.88 and gives the resulting value of 64.032 d {i6}, or by the Normalized Residual method (1992Ja06) which increases this uncertainty to 0.58 and gives a result of 64.032 d {i6}. So, the adopted value is the same for each of these three methods. 
J$from first-forbidden unique shape of |b-spectra from 1/2-, corroborated by spectroscopic factor data from (d,p) reactions (1986Fr05,1973Bi04) 
MOMM1$NMR on oriented nuclei in iron; adopted value from 2005St24. 
MOME2$electric quadrupole alignment of {+95}Zr+{+95}Nb in a Zr single crystal; others: (+)0.29 {I5} (1992Be50) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+),3/2,5/2+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=7.8 to 8.8 (log| {If{+1u}t}|>8.5) from 1/2-. |g to 5/2+, supported by |s(|q) in {+94}Zr(p,p),(p,p') in {+95}Nb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(+)
level_comment:
J$5/2,7/2 from primary |g from p-wave res but none from s-wave in (n,|g) E=2,24 keV. |g to 1/2+, supported by |s(|q) in {+94}Zr(p,p),(p,p') in {+95}Nb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$from L=5 in (d,p),({+3}He,|a), {+94}Zr({+3}He,d) IAR, and ({+3}He,|a). L(p,d)=(4) and L(d,t)=4 are discrepant. L({+3}He,|a)=5,(4). Shown without parentheses in level scheme figure 6 of 2005Pa48 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2471 {I10} (p,p),(p,p')), 2450 {I10} ((d,p),(|a,{+3}He)) and 2472 {I8} ({+3}He,|a) 
J$from angular momentum transfer in stripping and pickup reactions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2641 {I11} (p,p),(p,p')), 2625 {I10} ((d,p),(|a,{+3}He)) and 2647 {I10} ({+3}He,|a) 
J$L(d,p),(|a,{+3}He)=2+5, L({+3}He,|a)=4, L(d,t)=(2), and 3/2+ from |s(|q) in {+94}Zr(p,p),(p,p') in {+95}Nb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p),({+3}He,|a)=2+5, L({+3}He,|a)=4, L({+3}He,d)=4, and 3/2+ from |s(|q) in {+94}Zr(p,p),(p,p') in {+95}Nb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3012 {I5} (p,p),(p,p')) and 2996 {I10} ((d,p),(|a,{+3}He)) 
J$from |s(|q) in {+94}Zr(p,p),(p,p') in {+95}Nb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3061 {I12} (p,p),(p,p')) and 3062 {I10} ((d,p),(|a,{+3}He)) 
J$From angular momentum transfer in (d,p),(|a,{+3}He)t 
J$(7/2-) from |s(|q) in {+94}Zr(p,p),(p,p') in {+95}Nb discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-,11/2-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$3386 and 3420 may be the same state. However, their energies do not overlap within uncertainties. 
J$L(d,p),(|a,{+3}He)=5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$from Adopted Levels 
J$from first-forbidden unique shape of |b-spectra from 1/2- supported by shell model systematics. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Observed only by 1986Fr05; not confirmed in 2003So23, strength less than 1% of that for ground state population 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
E$from 2003So23 
$d|s/d|w (30|')=230 |mb/sr; d|s/d|w (70|')=43 |mb/sr 
L,S$L=4, s(7/2+)=0.106 (1963Co10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
L,S$L=2+3 for states at 3.62 MeV and 3.68 MeV with s(3/2+ and 7/2-)=0.030+0.024 and 0.016+0.014, respectively (1963Co10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from T{-1/2}(2|n2|b)=2.0x10{+19} y {i3}(stat.) {i2}(syst.), ~NEMO-3 Collaboration (2006Sh31,2005Sa07,2005Si06). Values from geochemical methods: T{-1/2}=9.4x10{+19} y {i32} (2001Wi17), T{-1/2}=3.9x10{+19} y {i9} (1993Ka12). Neutrino-less values from 1999Ar25, ~NEMO-2 Collaboration, 90% ~CL, T{-1/2}(0|n2|b, g.s. to g.s.)>1.0x10{+21} y, T{-1/2}(0|n2|b, g.s. to 2+)>3.9x10{+20} y. 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.3498 {I11} (2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E0 to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 38.0 ns {i15} (1972Bu18), 37.8 ns {i12} (1972AnZZ), and 38.2 ns {i12} (1971AnZF). 1971AnZF list their data as mean life; by comparing this group's later measurement in 1972AnZZ, the evaluator has assumed that their result was T{-1/2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$stretched E2 to 0+ 
T$from DSAM following Coulomb excitation of {+96}Zr beams (2003Ku11), other: 0.31 ps {I13} from B(E2)=0.055 {I22} (1965Ga05, Coulomb excitation) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=3 
T$from recoil distance measurement {+96}Zr({+32}S,{+32}S'|g) (1993Ho19). Other: 50 ps {i7} from |b decay of 5.34-s {+96}Y (1990Ma45); 46 ps {i15} from |b decay of 9.6-s {+96}Y (1990Oh02) both by the centroid-shift method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$J=3 from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); |p=+ from M1 to 2+ 
T$from (n,n'|g); value may be about 20% lower than indicated because cascade feeding was not considered 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=(2) 
T$from (n,n'|g); value may be about 20% lower than indicated because cascade feeding was not considered 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |b decay of 5.34-s {+96}Y (1990Ma45); other: >1.4 ps (n,n'|g) 
J$E0 to 0+; however, L=5 in (|a,|a') and (p,p'); 1990MoZY in (d,d') did not observe L=5 at this energy. They suggest that L(|a,|a') and (L(p,p') results may be due to an impurity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+,5+,6+)
level_comment:
J$E2 to 4+ and |g to 5-. L(p,p')=4; however, this result is suspect because of 90Zr contaminant peak at 3308 keV. J|p(3309)=(5,6)- (1987StZX), 5- (1988StZS) in the |b decay of 9.6-s isomer of {+96}Y; no experimental details available. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$(0) or (5) (1993Ho01) 
$|b{-0}{+2}=3.6|*10{+-5} if L=(0) (E(p)=22 MeV); B(E5)(W.u.)=1.1 (E(p)=65 MeV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3621 from 22 MeV data (1993Ho01) 
L$(0) or 2 (1993Ho01) 
$|b{-0}{+2}=3.6|*10{+-5} if L=(0) (E(p)=22 MeV) (1993Ho01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3701 from 22 MeV data (1993Ho01) 
L$(0,2); |b{-0}{+2}=4.9|*10{+-5} if L=(0) (E(p)=22 MeV), B(E2)(W.u.)=0.22 (E(p)=65 MeV) if L=(2) (1993Ho01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3749 from 22 MeV data (1993Ho01) 
$B(E4)(W.u.)=1.5 (E(p)=65 MeV) 
L$(4), 5 (1993Ho01); B(E5)(W.u.)=6.0 (E(p)=22 MeV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 38.0 ns {i15} (1972Bu18), 37.8 ns {i12} (1972AnZZ), and 38.2 ns {i12} (1971AnZF). 1971AnZF list their data as mean life; by comparing this group's later measurement in 1972AnZZ, the evaluator has assumed that this was a misprint and their result is T{-1/2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$B(EL)(W.u.)=0.9|*10{+-5} 
S$=|b{-0}{+2} (22 MeV); 1.6|*10{+-5} (52 MeV); B(E2)=0.89 for L=(2) (22 MeV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$B(E2): 0.027 {i7} (1987Ry01), 0.025 {i5} (1995Lu01); deformation length: 0.639 fm {i3} (1987Ry01), 0.59 fm {i3} (1995Lu01) 
$M{-n}/M{-p}: 4.7 {i6} (1987Ry01), 3.7 {i5} (DOMP) (1995Lu01), 4.3 {i7} (B-M folding with B(E2)=0.022 {i5}) (1995Lu01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$B(E3): 0.104 {i26} (1987Ry01), 0.060-0.080 (1995Lu01); deformation length: 1.228 fm {i11} (1987Ry01), 1.11 fm {i6} (1995Lu01) 
$M{-n}/M{-p}: 2.7 {i5} (1987Ry01), 1.22 {i11} (DOMP with B(E3)=0.120) (1995Lu01), 1.82 {i12} (B-M folding with B(E3)=0.120) (1995Lu01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from recoil distance measurement using the 146.7|g following inelastic excitation by {+32}S ions (1993Ho19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$M{-n}/M{-p}: 1.10 {i10} (using B(E3)=0.12 which gives the largest value of M{-n}/M{-p}) (1993Ho02,1992Ho12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$for the 0|n2|b decay mode of {+96}Zr to the ground state of {+96}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.). Others: > 1.5 |*10{+19} y for 0|n2|b decay mode to the 778 keV level of {+96}Mo, > 7.4 |*10{+17} y for 2|n2|b decay mode to the ground state of {+96}Mo, > 3.8 |*10{+17} y for 2|n2|b decay mode to the 778 keV level of {+96}Mo, and > 1.0 |*10{+17} for |b{+-} decay to {+96}Nb (2023Be10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$L=0 in (d,p),(|a,{+3}He) 
T$weighted average of 16.744 h {I11} (1987Si22) and 16.755 h {I13} (2005Hu14); others: 16.90 h {I5} (1973Sa36), 17.0 h {I2} (1940Gr04,1950Bu54,1952Ma24) 
MOMM1$measured by resonance cell LASER spectroscopy (2003Th03,2005St24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L=4 in (d,p),(|a,{+3}He); |g to 1/2+ g.s. is not E4 (RUL), 
T$weighted average of 102 {I3} ns (1985Be20), 104 {I5} ns (1976SaYU), 106 {I7} ns (1996Lh03), and 97 {I16} ns (2006Hw01) 
MOMM1$from g-factor=+0.39 {I4} (time differential perturbed angular correlation) (1985Be20,1989Ra17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (d,p),(|a,{+3}He) dataset; J=5/2+ in (pol d,p) (same dataset). log| {Ift}=6.25 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.1) from (1/2-) {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (3.75 s) rather sustains 3/2+, in which case the intense 407|g decaying the 1807, (7/2-) would Be a (M2) transition, which seems less likely. (3/2+,5/2+) adopted here is a compromise until elucidating new measurements will Be done or other extra arguments will Be found. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=6.2 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s); (7/2) from D |g from (5/2+), 1996; (7/2-) from (E2) |g from 2264 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L=(2) member of the 1848 doublet seen in (d,p),(|a,{+3}He) (also supported by log| {Ift}=6.8 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.6) from (1/2-) {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (3.75 s)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$(1/2,3/2) from log| {Ift}=6.3 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.1) from (1/2-) {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (3.75 s) and (7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=6.2 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s) are discrepant; (5/2+) from E2 |g (D,E2 from RUL) to 1/2+ g.s. is the best compromise 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$(3/2+,5/2+) from L=(2) in (d,p) and (7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=6.2 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s) are discrepant; (5/2+) seems best compromise 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=5.9 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y (1.17 s) decay; (9/2-,11/2) from no |g's to 3/2+ and 5/2+; 1996Lh03 suggest (11/2-) previously assigned by 1993Ar09 to the close lying 2265 level populated in {+96}Zr(d,p),(|a,{+3}He) and {+96}Zr({+12}C,{+11}C) (from L=5 in (d,p),(|a,{+3}He) and 11/2 from {+96}Zr({+3}He,d) IAS), which is adopted here 
T$from 1996Lh03 ({+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2)
level_comment:
J$(7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=5.9 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y (1.17 s) decay; (7/2,9/2) from |g to 3/2+,5/2+, 1400 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$(7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=5.3 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s); (7/2,9/2) from |g to 7/2+, 1264, and |g to (7/2-), 1807 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$(7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=6.1 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s); (7/2+) from |g to 3/2+, 1103 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2,11/2+)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.0 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s), |g to 7/2+, 1264, and |g to 3/2+,5/2+, 1400 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.6 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s), |g to (3/2+,5/2+), 1859, and |g to 7/2+, 1264 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J$(1/2-,3/2-) from log| {Ift}=4.6 from (1/2-) {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (3.75 s); (3/2-) from |g to (5/2+), 1997 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$(1/2-,3/2-) from log| {Ift}=4.8 from (1/2-) {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (3.75 s); (3/2-) from E1 |g to (5/2+), 2057 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2,11/2+)
level_comment:
J$(7/2,9/2,11/2) from log| {Ift}=5.4 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s); (7/2-,9/2,11/2+) from |g to 11/2-, 2264, and |g to 7/2+, 1264; (7/2-,9/2) if 1617|g to (7/2-), 1807 is confirmed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+,11/2+)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.3 from (9/2)+ {+97}Y |b{+-} decay (1.17 s) and |g to (11/2-), 2264; (9/2+) if 2311|g to (7/2-), 1807 is confirmed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_comment:
CONF$25/2- doublet member of this configuration ({+97}Y |b{+-} decay (142 ms)) 
J$log| {Ift}=4.7 from (27/2-) parent ({+97}Y |b{+-} decay (142 ms)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_comment:
CONF$27/2- doublet member of this configuration ({+97}Y |b{+-} decay (142 ms)) 
J$log| {Ift}=4.8 from (27/2-) parent ({+97}Y |b{+-} decay (142 ms)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$by time-differential perturbed angular correlation; g-factor indicates a simple configuration=(|n g{-7/2}) (1985Be20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_comment:
CONF$25/2- doublet member of this configuration (from |b{+-} decay of 27/2- ((|p g{-9/2})(|n g{-7/2}h{-11/2}))) 
J$log| {Ift}=4.7 from (27/2-) of {+97}Y |b{+-}-decay parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_comment:
CONF$27/2- doublet member of this configuration (from |b{+-} decay of 27/2- ((|p g{-9/2})(|n g{-7/2}h{-11/2}))) 
J$log| {Ift}=4.8 from (27/2-) of {+97}Y |b{+-}-decay parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$J=5/2 from vector-analyzing power (1980HeZS); disagrees with log| {If{+1u}t}=8.11 from (1/2-) {+97}Y 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=2+4 needed to get agreement between (d,p) and (|a,{+3}He) data (1973Bi04) 
S$if peak is 2d3/2 + 1g7/2 doublet (1973Bi04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius=4.401 fm {I16} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+90}Zr,{+98}Zr)=+1.002 fm{+2} {I5} (2013An02) 
T$from 1976He10. Others: 1968DeZZ, 1967Hu08, 1960Or02. 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}({+90}Zr,{+98}Zr)=+0.981 fm{+2} {I5} (2003Th03,2002Ca37); systematic uncertainty=0.043 fm{+2}. Also 2005Bi25 from the same group 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E0 transition to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 64 ns {I7} from {+98}Y |b{+-} decay (0.548 s) and 65 ns {I10} from (n,F|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 368.8|g to 0+ 
T$from RDDS in {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) (2018Si26). Others: |>0.68 ps from B(E2)(W.u.)=8.9 {I20} or <11 (2018Wi09) deduced from |g-ray yields in Coulomb excitation; <4 ps from fast-timing |g|g-coin in {+235}U(n,F|g), {+241}Pu(n,F|g), and analysis by generalized centroid difference method (2017An15); <11 ps (2010Be30), <21 ps (1989Ma38), <0.2 ns (1982Ka03), all from |b|g(t) in {+98}Y decay (0.548 s); <0.20 ns (2001AhZY, |g|g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay) 
MOMM1$>+0.38 {I17} (integral PAC method, preliminary result from 2001AhZY) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E0 to 0+ 
T$from |b|g|g(t) or |b|g(t) in {+98}Y |b{+-} decay (0.548 s). Unweighted average of 0.611 ns {I33} (2010Be30), 0.865 ns {I42} (1989Ma38), 0.69 ns {I10} (1982Ka03). Weighted average is 0.71 ns {I9}, but reduced |h{+2}=11 is too high. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$620.5|g E2 to 2+; 204.3|g from 4+; probable band assignment (1995HaZT). However, |g|g(|q) in {+98}Y |b{+-} decay (2.32 s) suggests J=3 
T$from RDDS in {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) (2018Si26). Others: 20 ps {I6} from |b|g(t) in {+98}Y |b{+-} decay (2.32 s) (2010Be30); |<10 ps (2017An15, |g|g(t) fast-timing technique, |<14 ps in {+241}Pu(n,F|g), and |<10 ps in {+235}U(n,F|g)); 28 ps {I12} (from {+98}Y decay (2.32 s), quoted by 1994St31 from thesis by M. Liang, University of Koln (1992)). Note that in 2017An15, lifetime of this state could not be determined precisely due to imprecise lifetime of the first 2+ state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$636.5|g E2 to 2+; E0 to 0+ 
T$from |b|g(t) in {+98}Y |b{+-} decay (0.548 s). Weighted average of 0.318 ns {I27} (2010Be30), 0.283 ns {I15} (1989Ma38), and 0.24 ns {I10} (1982Ka03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1986Me11 quote 2+ from decay characteristics; however, no details of |g rays from this level are available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1986Me11 quote 3+ from decay characteristics; however, no details of |g transitions from this level are available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$647.6|g |DJ=2, E2 to 4+; band member 
T$from RDDS in {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) (2018Si26). Other: <10 ps from |b|g(t) in {+98}Y |b{+-} decay (2.32 s) (2010Be30) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1986Me11 quote 4+ from decay characteristics; however, no details of |g transitions from this level are available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1986Me11 quote 2+ from decay characteristics; however, no details of |g transitions from this level are available 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$725.4|g |DJ=2, E2 to 6+; spin=8 from |g|g(|q) in {+252}Cf SF decay; band member 
T$from DSAM in {+248}Cm SF decay (2012Sm02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$log {Ift}=4.3 (allowed transition) from 0-; 2728.9|g to 0+; spin=1 from |g|g(|q) in {+252}Cf SF decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$log {Ift}=5.2 (allowed transition) from 0-; 2411.9|g to 0+; also supported by |g|g(|q) in (n,F|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15-)
level_comment:
E$2006Si36 suggest that 6541 level is most likely different from a (16+) level at 6539 decaying by a 949.6|g proposed by 2004Wu08, as no 820|g was reported in 2004Wu08 
J$|gs to (14+) and (13-); member of a sequence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$proposed configuration=|pg{-9/2}{+2}~#|n(g{-7/2}h{-11/2}) 
T$from sum of time spectra gated on 952|g+835|g+820|g+804|g+770|g+768|g+725|g+718|g (2006Si36). Other: 1.4 |ms {I5} (2013RuZX, from 1223|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from the Adopted Levels. Measurements in this dataset: 63 ns {I7} from (ce)|g(t) (1977Si05), weighted average of five values: 65 ns {I15} for 269|g, 62 ns {I15} for 369|g, 70 ns {I15} for 737|g, 63 ns {I15} for 890|g, and 54 ns {I15} for 3310|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from the Adopted Levels. Measurements in this dataset: <11 ps (|b|g(t), 2010Be30), |<21 ps (|b|g(t),1989Ma38), <0.2 ns (|b|g(t),1982Ka03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) (1984Be50,1982Ka03) 
T$0.72 ns {I8} from |b|g(t); unweighted average of 0.611 ns {I33} (2010Be30), 0.865 ns {I42} (1989Ma38), and 0.69 ns {I10} (1982Ka03). Weighted average is 0.71 ns {I9}, but reduced |h{+2}=11 is too large. Value is the same in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$Population of 2778.7 level requires 1806 level, although not listed in Table VII of 2017Ur03. The level was known earlier from 1984Be50 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) (1984Be50,1982Ka03) 
T$|b|g(t); weighted average of 0.318 ns {I27} (2010Be30), 0.283 ns {I15} (1989Ma38), 0.24 ns {I10} (1982Ka03). Same value in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<2577 {I15} from Q(|b{+-})({+98}Y g.s.)-S(n)({+98}Zr), where Q(|b{+-})=8992 {I12} for {+98}Y g.s. decay, and S(n)=6415 {I8} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Level questioned by the evaluators, due to a different placement of 837|g, and not listed in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|s=0.041 
$|s(exp)/|s(DW)=0.84 (1974Fl02) for configuration=|nd{-3/2}~#|nd{-3/2} 
$B(E2)(to 854)/B(E2)(to g.s.)=11 (1986Me11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|s=0.033 
$|s(exp)/|s(DW)=1.3 (1974Fl02) for configuration=|nd{-3/2}~#|ng{-7/2} 
$B(E2)(to 1437)/B(E2)(to 854)>2 (1986Me11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|s=0.137 
$|s(exp))/|s(DW)=0.94 (1974Fl02) for configuration=|ns{-1/2}~#|nd{-3/2} 
$B(E2)(to 854)/B(E2)(to g.s.)=5 (1986Me11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$|s=0.020 
$1986Me11 suggest 4+ from B(E2)(to 1224)/B(E2)(to 1591)<2. |g|g(|q) data (1988StZS,1994St31) give J=3, instead 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$|s=0.134 
$|s(exp))/|s(DW)=1.0 (1974Fl02) for configuration=|ns{-1/2}~#|ng{-7/2} 
$B(E2)(to 1591)/B(E2)(to 1224)=17 (1986Me11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) (1988StZS,1994St31) suggests J=3. 
T$from |b|g(t) (2010Be30). Other: 28 ps {I12} (quoted by 1994St31 from thesis by M. Liang, University of Cologne (1992) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<3043 {I15} from Q(|b{+-})({+98m}Y)-S(n)({+98}Zr), where Q(|b{+-})=9458 {I12} for {+98}Y isomer decay, and S(n)=6415 {I8} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15-)
level_comment:
E$2006Si36 suggest that this level is most likely different from a 16+ level at 6539.8 decaying by a 950|g proposed by 2004Wu08, as no 820|g was reported in 2004Wu08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$6601.9 {I11} in the Adopted Levels 
$Configuration=|pg{-9/2}{+2}~#|n(g{-7/2}h{-11/2}) 
T$from sum of time spectra when gated on 952|g+835|g+820|g+804|g+ 770|g+768|g+725|g+718|g (2006Si36). Other: 1.4 |ms {I5} (2013RuZX, 1223|g(t)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$from fast-timing |g|g-coin technique, and analysis by generalized centroid difference method (GCDM) (2017An15); mean lifetime |t|<6 ps from |t|<10 ps in {+241}Pu(n,F|g), |<6 ps in {+235}U(n,F|g). Due to the uncertainties in prompt response differences (PRD) and Compton background corrections in both the reactions, the lifetime of the first 2+ state could not be determined precisely. This value can be compared with |t|<15 ps in 2010Be30 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$from fast-timing |g|g-coin technique, and analysis by generalized centroid difference method (GCDM) (2017An15); mean lifetime |t|<15 ps from mean lifetime |t|<20 ps in {+241}Pu(n,F|g), and |<15 ps in {+235}U(n,F|g). Due to the imprecise lifetime of the first 2+ state, lifetime of the first 4+ state could not be determined precisely. This value can be compared with |t=29 ps {I8} in 2010Be30 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Level questioned by the evaluators due to misplacement of 837|g, and not listed in the Adopted dataset. 
J$from 2012Mu08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by evaluators from T{-1/2}|<4.1 ps and |>0.68 ps, corresponding to B(E2)(W.u.)|>1.83 and |<11, as listed in comments for 1222.9|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J From systematics of J|p=1/2+ in nuclei with N=59, such as {+101}Mo, {+97}Sr, {+95}Kr, and {+93}Se. 
T from 1979Se01. Others: 2.0 s {I2}, 1.8 s {I3} (1972Tr08), 2.5 s {I1}, 2.1 s {I1}, 2.8 s {I3} (1970Ei02). 
MOMM1 Resonance cell laser spectroscopy (2003Th03, 2005St24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J |g122 M1 to (1/2+), log| {Ift}>5.9 from (5/2+). 
T from 1990OhZT. Others: 0.9 ns {I1} (1989Lh01); 1.1 ns {I2} (1987KaZV,1986SiZY). 
MOMM1 Integral perturbed angular correlation (1995Wo01, 2005St24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J |g130 (E2) to (3/2+). Systematics of J|p=7/2+ in neighboring nuclei with N=59. 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+99}Y |b{+-} Decay (1986SiZY); 292 ns {i20} from |b|g(t) (1979Se01). Other: 400 ns {I80} (1970Gr38); 400 ns {I20} (1999Ge01); 316 ns 48 (2005Hw06, 2004Hw02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J |g614 to (1/2+). No other |g ray observed from this level. 
T$From |b{+-} decay (2005Lh01). Other value: 6.9 ns {i12} (1997Lh02). Other: 1997Lh01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J |g64 E2 to (3/2-), |g427 to (7/2+) 
T$From |b{+-} decay (2005Lh01, 1997Lh02). Other: 10.2 ns {i15} (1979Se01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J |g661 to (3/2+), |g782 to (1/2+). Even parity from systematics of J|p=3/2+ in neighboring nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 2003Ur01 in {+248}Cm SF decay 
J$381|g reported in 2003Ur01 decaying to 658 level is inconsistent with adopted J|p values 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from slope method, gated by 192.6|g in Ge detector and 536.0|g-121.7|g(t) in LaBr detectors (2019Sp03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from centroid difference method, gated by 121.7|g in Ge detector and 192.6|g-536.0|g(t) in LaBr detectors (2019Sp03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from slope method, gated by 566.0|g in Ge detector and 415.0|g-143.0|g(t) in LaBr detectors (2019Sp03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from centroid difference method, gated by 121.7|g + 536.0|g in Ge detector and 215.5|g-192.6|g(t) in LaBr detectors (2019Sp03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from centroid difference method, gated by 143.0|g in Ge detector and 566.0|g-415.0|g(t) in LaBr detectors (2019Sp03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$Measured g factor=0.66 {I4} (2020Bo04, from TDPAD method, sign is not determined) 
T$measured by 2020Bo04 from |g(t). This value can be compared with 316 ns {I48} (2004Hw02: Phys. Rev. C 69, 057301); 0.40 |ms {I2} (1999Ge01: Phys. Rev. C 59, 82); 292 ns {i20} (1979Se01: Zeit. Physik A289, 197); 0.40 |ms {I8} (1970Gr38: Phys. Lett. B33, 474). Other: 293 ns {I10} (1986SiZY: JUL-Spez-344, p.28 report, from the same group and the same method as 1979Se01). Note that in the {+99}Zr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (July 2017 update), value of 293 ns {I10} from 1986SiZY is adopted, which in the opinion of compiler is not justified in the presence of their earlier value of 292 ns {I20} in 1979Se01, and several other independent measurements. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |t=437 ps {I18} using GCD method 2023Pf03. Others: |t=388 ps {I36} from slope method and |t=375 ps {I14} from convolution method (2023Pf03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from growth and decay of {+100}Nb in a chemically separated zirconium fraction (1976Ah06, earlier value of 7.1 s {I2} in 1972Tr08). Others: 7.0 s {I5} (1977Pf01), 6.6 s {I2} (1970Ei02), 7.1 s {I7} (1969WiZX). Note that in 1972Tr08, 1970Ei02 and 1969WiZX, the half-life was incorrectly assigned to {+100}Nb decay based on |g(t) in the decay daughter {+100}Mo, which however could account for the mixture of {+100}Zr and {+100}Nb decays that have comparable half-lives. 
T$1977Pf01 and 1969WiZX use 535|g(t), 1970Ei02 use 159|g(t) 
$Evaluated rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.489 fm {i29} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>{+1/2}>({+90}Zr,{+100}Zr)=1.669 fm{+2} {I4} (2013An02) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+90}Zr,{+100}Zr)=1.666 fm{+2} {I41} (2003Th03, also 2002Ca37,2005Bi25), uncertainty is primarily systematic, statistical uncertainty is 0.004. 
$From |b-strength distributions evaluated by 2019Gu20 in their TAGS for the decay of {+100}Zr and comparison with quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA), suggest a prolate configuration for the ground state of {+100}Zr (see plot of B(>) versus E(level) in {+100}Nb in Fig. 9 of 2019Gu20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$212.5|g E2 to 0+ 
T$from weighted average of following values: 0.582 ns {I13} (2017An15) from |g|g(t) in (n,F|g); 0.55 ns {I2} (1989Ma47), 0.54 ns {I4} (1989Oh06), 0.40 ns {I8} (1989Lh01) from |g|g(t) in |b{+-} decay (732 ms); 0.643 ns {I52} (2002Sm10), 0.71 ns {I3} (1975JaYL, 1974JaZN, 1974JaYY), 0.52 ns {I10} (1970Ch11, 1972Wi15), 0.62 ns {I10} (1980ChZM), from recoil distance method in {+252}Cf SF. Others (discrepant) results: 0.20 ns {I3} (1983MaYT, RDM), 2.8 ns {I9} (1972ClZN, 1974ClZX, |g|g(t)), and 7 ns {I2} from (fragment)|g(t) (1970Jo20), in {+252}Cf SF. In the averaging procedure, uncertainty for value in 1975JaYL was doubled as complete details of this measurement are not available. Note that in 2016Pr01 evaluation T{-1/2}=0.548 ns {I+18-24}, where values from 2017An15 and 2002Sm10 were not included. In our case, excluding the value from 2002Sm10 makes insignificant difference in the final value. 
MOMM1$from g factor=+0.30 {I3} measured by |g(|q,H,t) (integral PAC method) for 352|g-213|g and 497|g-213|g correlations in {+252}Cf SF decay (2004Sm04), with a correction using adopted T{-1/2}=0.574 ns {I15}. Value of |m=+0.60 {I6} implied by g factor=0.30 {I3} in 2004Sm04 (also in 2014StZZ) using T{-1/2}=0.54 ns {I2} from 1997Si09 evaluation. Other: 0.44 {I10} from |g|g(|q,H,t) (integral PAC technique) in {+100}Y |b{+-} decay (1980Wo09) using T{-1/2}=0.71 ns {I3} from 1975JaYL, revised to 0.52 ns {I12} in 1989Wo05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(118.6|g)(212.5|g)(|q) in |b{+-} decay decay (732 ms) and RUL give 2+ for 212.5 level and 0+ for 331.1 level 
T$from |b{+-} decay 
$E0 transition strength analyzed: 2004Vo13 (also 2005We15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm,{+256}Cf SF decay; 351.96|g, E2 to 2+ 
T$average of 37.0 ps {I4} (2002Sm10, differential plunger method) in {+252}SF decay and 37 ps {I4} (1989Oh06, |b|g|g(t)) in |b{+-} decay (732 ms). Other: 25.6 ps {I28} (|g|g(t) in (n,F|g), 2017An15) seems discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$spin from |g|g(|q), parity from RUL (negative parity would require mult(616.7|g)=M2 and thus an isomeric T{-1/2}(829 level)>16 ns by RUL, which is unlikely) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) consistent with 2 |) 2|) 0 spin sequence; 547.4|g and 878.5|g to 0+; 314.3|g to 4+; band member 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF decay; 497.1|g, E2 to 4+ 
T$weighted average of 4.9 ps {I11} from time-gated plunger method in {+252}Cf SF decay (2002Sm10) and 8.3 ps {I35} from |g|g(t) in (n,F|g) (2017An15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF decay (2019Ur01); 850.2|g (M1+E2) to (4+); 536.05|g and 1202.2|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF decay; 625.5|g, |DJ=2, E2 to (6+) 
T$average of 1.73 ps {I17} from time-gated plunger method in {+252}Cf SF decay (2002Sm10), and 1.77 ps {I21} from DSAM (1996Sm04,2012Sm02) in {+248}Cm SF decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$845.2|g and 1695.2|g to (4+), 403.7|g and 1198.2|g to (6+) 
T$time-gated |g|g|g coincidence method (2006Hw01) in {+252}Cf SF decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF decay; 739.0|g, |DJ=2, E2 to 8+ 
T$Doppler-broadened line shape analysis (2012Sm02,1996Sm04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9(+)
level_comment:
J$J=9 from |g|g(|q) in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF decay; 1332.15|g to 8+; 493.55|g to 7(+); band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<2369 {I24} from Q(|b{+-}) (for {+100}Y decay) + Energy of the isomer - S(n)({+100}Zr), where Q(|b{+-})=9051 {I14}, energy of the isomer=145 {I15} and S(n)=6827 {I13} from 2021Wa16 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.64 ns {I5} (2002Sm10), 0.71 ns {I3} (1974JaYY), 0.62 ns {I10} (1980ChZM), and 0.52 ns {I10} (1970Ch11,1972Wi15), all measured using Doppler-shift recoil distance method (RDM). Others: 0.20 ns {I3} (1983MaYT,RDM). The (fragment)(|g)(t) method gives poor results: 7 ns {I2} (1970Jo20), 2.8 ns {I9} (1972ClZN), <3 ns (1974ClZX) 
$g factor measured by |g(|q,H) technique (IPAC) using 352|g-213|g and 497|g-213|g correlations. Other: +0.32 {I5} (2008RaZY), 0.33 {I7} (2008GoZL). Both 2004Sm04 and 2008RaZY have used a lifetime of 0.78 ns {I3} (1997Si09 evaluation) for deducing the g factor, while 2008GoZL use T{-1/2}=0.59 ns {I3} from 2008Si01 evaluation. 
$ Q{-t}=3.19 {I14} (2002Sm10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Q{-t}=3.16 {I2} (2002Sm10). Uncertainty of 0.14 in table 1 of 2002Sm10 is a misprint as confirmed in an e-mail reply of July 4, 2002 from one of the authors (A.G. Smith) of 2002Sm10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(5-) suggested for this band head in earlier work (1997Ha64) 
T$from time-gated triple |g coin method (2006Hw01). The authors quote also an uncertainty of 0.4 ns in the text of the paper. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$|b|g(t) (weighted average of 0.55 ns {I2} (1989Ma47) and 0.54 ns {I4} (1989Oh06)). Others: 1989Wo05 cite 0.61 ns {I8} from literature, 0.40 ns {I8} from |g|g(t) (1989Lh01) 
$From |g|g(|q,H,t), g factor=0.22 {I5} (1980Wo09). Sign of g factor is not given by 1980Wo09, but it is likely to be positive 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 5.60 ns {I15} (|b|g|g(t), 1990Ma01) and 5.36 ns {I23} (|g|g(t), 1989Lh01). Other: 3.37 ns {I30} (|bce(t), 1978Kh01) 
J$from (119|g)(213|g)(|q) (1978Se03,1986Wo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2+)
level_comment:
$The branching ratios of |g rays are in disagreement with those from 2002Lh01 in the decay of {+100}Y |b{+-} decay (0.94 s) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x<2224 {I19} from Q(|b{+-}) (for {+100}Y decay - S(n)({+100}Zr), where Q(|b{+-})=9051 {I14}, and S(n)=6827 {I13} from 2021Wa16 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$from (1291.6|g)(351.99|g+212.67|g)(|q), where no solution for |d(1291.6|g to 4+) was obtained for J(1856 level)=3 or 5 (2019Ur02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
$A tentative 1397|g in {+252}Cf SF decay (2006Hw04, and Erratum published in Phys. Rev. C 106, 069901(E) (2022)) is not confirmed by 2019Ur02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$from (1680.0|g)(351.99|g+212.67|g)(|q), where no solution for |d(1680.0|g to 4+) was obtained for J(2245)=5 or 6 (2019Ur02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=840 ps {I18} from |t=830 ps {I30} in {+241}Pu(n,F|g), and 850 ps {I20} in {+235}U(n,F|g) (2017An15). Other: T{-1/2}=573 ps {I50} (2013RuZX, |g|g(t), also measurement at ILL-Grenoble, probably using the same experimental setup as in 2017An15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=37 ps {I4} from {+235}U(n,F|g) (2017An15). Other: |t=25 ps {I10} from {+241}Pu(n,F|g), where the lifetime is affected by a contaminant |g line in the complementary fission partner (2017An15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$from (1291.6|g)(summed |g)(|q), where no solution for |d(1291.6|g to 4+) was obtained for J(1856)=3 or 5. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$from (1680.0|g)(summed |g)(|q), where no solution for |d(1680.0|g to 4+) was obtained for J(2245)=5 or 6. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from systematics, assumed bandhead of K=3/2 band 
E$g.s. assignment probable from similarity of its |b decay half-life with {+99}Zr g.s. 
T$average of 2.0 s {I3} via growth-decay curve (276|g,{+101}Mo) (1972Tr08), 2.2 s {I3} via I|g(307|g,{+101}Ru) with timed zirconium separations (1972Tr08) and 2.4 s {I1} (1991Oh03) Other: 3.3 s {I6} (293|g-decay curve) (1970Ei02). {+235}U(n,F) ms, was reassigned to {+102}Nb by 1972Tr08, 1976Ah06 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to (3/2+) 
T$Average of 0.9 ns {I3} (1987Oh01) and 0.39 ns {I18} (1995Lh01) 
G$from (134|g)(98|g)(|q) and (223|g)(98|g)(|q) 
$ g{-K}=-0.59 {I15}, g{-R}=+0.26 {I4}; assuming Q{-0}=4.1 {I2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$from (104|g)(217|g)(|q) 
$ g{-K}=-0.36 {I11}, g{-R}=+0.23 {I10}; assuming Q{-0}=3.9 {I3} 
J$3/2 suggested by 1983Wo10 is ruled out by 1990Ho12 and 1995Lh01 on |g decay considerations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$from (147|g)(104|g)(|q) and (147|g)(223|g)(|q) 
$ g{-K}=-0.39 {I6}, g{-R}=+0.19 {I4}; assuming Q{-0}=3.9 {I3} 
J$M1 |g to (5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 2004Ur06 
J$spin from |g|g(|q), parity from Weisskopf estimates. This level is interpreted as a K-isomer (2004Ur06) corresponding to the 9/2 [404] neutron-hole excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$from (134|g)(98|g)(|q) and (223|g)(98|g)(|q) 
$ g{-K}=-0.59 {I15}, g{-R}=+0.26 {I4}; assuming Q{-0}=4.1 {I2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G$from (147|g)(104|g)(|q) and (147|g)(223|g)(|q) 
$ g{-K}=-0.39 {I6}, g{-R}=+0.19 {I4}; assuming Q{-0}=3.9 {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.5690 fm {i218} (2004An14, evaluation) 
T from 1976Ah06; half-life was measured by following the growth and decay of the niobium daughter in zirconium samples. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 151.9|g is (E2) as seen in {+235}U(n,F) 
T$From (2001Ra27). Others: 1.91 ns {I25} from {+252}Cf,{+254}Cf SF decay by recoil-distance Doppler-shift method. 3.0 ns from |g|g|g(t) in {+252}Cf(SF)(2005Fo17)and 2.76 ns {I36} from the technique of time-integral perturbed angular correlations using {+252Cf} SF and {+248}Cu SF sources (2004Sm04) 
MOMM1$From g=+0.22 {I5} 2004Sm04, 2005Sm08 with the technique of time-integral perturbed angular correlations using {+252Cf} SF and {+248}C SF decays 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
J |g decay to 2+ but not to 4+ suggests (0+) for this level. (1+) cannot be excluded but 0+ favored from systematics 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 1.71 ns {I14} (1980ChZM) and 2.21 ns {I17} (1974JaZN), both determined by recoil-distance Doppler-shift method. Others: 0.86 ns {I18}, recoil-distance Doppler (1970Ch11); 1.7 ns {I4}, Ice(t) (1970Wa05). The value 3.17 ns {I25} from 1974JaYY is assumed to be |t, rather than T{-1/2}, and is then identical to T{-1/2}=2.21 ns {I17} of 1974JaZN. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 6.7 ns {I6} and 6.5 ns {I10} from |b|g(t) using 579|g and 1090|g in the EURICA (HPGe) and LaBr data, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$adopted mean lifetime |t=2.91 ns {I8} from |t=2.91 ns {I15} in {+241}Pu(n,F|g), and 2.91 ps {I7} in {+235}U(n,F|g). This value can be compared with |t=2.6 ns {I5} (2001Ra27 evaluation in At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 1); and T{-1/2}=2.5 ns {I3} (or |t=3.61 ns {I43}) in 2015Br03: Acta Phys. Pol. B46, 721, measured at RIBF-RIKEN facility 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$adopted mean lifetime |t=46 ps {I7} from {+235}U(n,F|g). Other: 21 ps {I15} from {+241}Pu(n,F|g), where the lifetime is affected by a contaminant |g line from a complementary fission partner. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$adopted mean lifetime |t|<12 ps from {+235}U(n,F|g). Other: 13 ps {I11} from {+241}Pu(n,F|g), where the lifetime is affected by a contaminant |g line from a complementary fission partner. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J$from (763.80|g)(326.50)(|q) and (1090.20|g)(151.90)(|q), where no solution for |d(763.8|g to 4+) and for |d(1090.2|g to 2+) was obtained for J(1242)=2 or 4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
J$from (891.1|g)(summed |g)(|q), where no solution for |d(891.1|g to 4+) was obtained for J(1369)=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$from (908.10|g)(326.50)(|q), where no solution for |d(908.10|g to 4+) was obtained for J(1386)=3, 5 or 6 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
J$from (1174.40|g)(summed |g)(|q), where no solution for |d(1174.4|g to 4+) was obtained for J(1653)=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
J$from (697.05|g)(summed |g)(|q), where no solution for |d(697.05|g to 6+) was obtained for J(1662)=4 or 6 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
J$from (498.1|g)(summed |g)(|q), where no solution for |d(498.1|g to 8+) was obtained for J(2093)=6. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$From Zr systematics. Suggested Nilsson configuration: 5/2[532] (2004Hu02). No direct measurement of J|p performed 
T from decay curves of the most intense |g transitions in {+103}Zr |b{+-} decay (1980ScZZ). Although the authors no longer support the relative intensities for the |g rays, they state that the T{-1/2} value is still valid. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
Authors propose a log| {Ift}=4.9 from an estimated I|b=71 
Suggested Nilsson configuration: 3/2[411] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ from 2009Pe06; systematic uncertainty=50 and statistical uncertainty=30 combined in quadrature by compilers 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |b|g(t) in 2015Br13. Authors of 2015Br13 indicated that ~50% side feeding from 4+ to 2+ was observed therefore a 35 ps systematic uncertainty has been included in the upperlimit of the lifetime based on the estimated lifetime of 4+ state in 2002Sm10. 
$|b{-2} = 0.39 {I1} (2015Br13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: [5/2+]
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$Based on systematics 
T$from maximum likelihood analysis in {+9}Be({+136}Xe,X) (2009Pe06); Others: 0.6~s~{I1} (1996Me09), and 1.0~s~{I+12-4} in {+238}U(p,X|g) (1992Ay02) 
CONF$5/2+[413] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=0.6 (2003Mo09) 
T$weighted average of 175 ms {I7} (2015Lo04), 186 ms {I11} (2011Ni01), and 260 ms {I40} (2009Pe06). Method: ion-|b correlations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
$Transition from this level to the first 2+ state is expected, but no |g-ray peak was observed at 455 keV due to low statistics (2011Su11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |b|g(t) in 2015Br13. Authors of 2015Br13 indicated that ~50% side feeding from 4+ to 2+ was observed therefore a 35 ps systematic uncertainty has been included in the upperlimit of the lifetime based on the estimated lifetime of 4+ state in 2003Hu07. 
$|b{-2} = 0.36 {I1} from 2015Br13 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=1.5 (2003Mo09) 
E$it is assumed that the measured half-life corresponds to the g.s. of {+107}Zr 
T$weighted average of 150 ms {I3} (2015Lo04), 138 ms {I4} (2011Ni01) and 150 ms {I+40-30} (2009Pe06). Method: analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve. 
J$1/2+ in theoretical considerations (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=1.96 (2003Mo09) 
T$weighted average of 78.5 ms {I20} (2015Lo04, 785 ms {I2} in Table I of 2015Lo04 is a misprint, as confirmed in an e-mail reply of June 11, 2015 from G. Lorusso) and 73 ms {I4} (2011Ni01); from the analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Number of implanted fragments=1.5|*10{+5} (2012Ka36) 
T$from |g(t) (2012Ka36). Other: 0.62 |ms {I15} (2011Su11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Level existence is uncertain due to absence of reliable |g-|g coincidence information. 
T$from 571|g(t) (2024Mo23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Tentative assignment based on systematic relative energy difference in the |g band between the 3{-1}{++} and 2{-2}{++} states in {+110}Mo and {+112}Ru isotones. 
T$from 604|g(t) (2024Mo23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$from systematics of odd-A Zr isotopes; probable direct |b{+-} feeding to the (7/2+) state in {+109}Nb (2011Wa03, 2012Wa41); J|p=7/2-, associated with the |n7/2-[523] orbital, is predicted in 1997Mo25 
T$using ion-|b(t) in 2015Lo04. Other: 63 ms {I+38-17} using the maximum likelihood method in 2011Ni01 
CONF$likely |n5/2+[402] orbital. The assignment is tentative 
$%|b{+-}n=3.2 is predicted in 1997Mo25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=7.2, %|b{+-}2n=0 (2003Mo09) 
T$from 2015Lo04. Other: 37 ms {I+17-9} (2011Ni01). Method: from the analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve in both the studies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=7.2, %|b{+-}2n=0 (2003Mo09) 
T$measured by 2015Lo04 from the analysis of the (implanted ions)|b correlated decay curve in time and position. Earlier value: 37 ms {I+17-9} (2011Ni01: Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 052502; from the same lab as 2015Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$From 2020Ha14, half-life from decay curve for 90.5- and 95-keV |g rays emitted by the decay of {+110}Zr to {+110}Nb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$from 373|g(t) (2024Mo23) 
E$566|g is expected, but not observed. 2024Mo23 deduced a limit of I|g(373|g)/I|g(566|g) |< 15% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Tentative assignment based on systematic relative energy difference in the |g band between the 3{-1}{++} and 2{-2}{++} states in {+110}Mo and {+112}Ru isotones. 
T$from 631|g(t) (2024Mo23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=14.7, %|b{+-}2n=1.0 (2003Mo09) 
E$it is assumed that the measured half-life corresponds to the g.s. of {+111}Zr 
J$1/2- in theoretical considerations (1997Mo25) 
T$from 2015Lo04 from analysis of the (ion)|b-correlated decay curve; and maximum likelihood method. Note that the 2015Lo04 list 24.0 ms {I5} but judging from the value plotted in their Fig. 2, as well as from the uncertainties quoted for other isotopes, it seems to be 5 ms 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$the authors state that the measured small isomeric ratio of 0.17 {I2} indicates a higher spin for this isomer than that of ground state according to the in-flight fission and fragmentation mechanism. 
T$from 265|g(t) 
$Isomeric ratio=0.17 {I2} (2022Wu18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Measured |s=7 pb (2010Oh02), systematic uncertainty|?40% 
T$measured by 2015Lo04 from the analysis of the (implanted ions)|b correlated decay curve in time and position. 
$T{-1/2}|?15 ms (from systematics). A value of |?43 ms is predicted in 2003Mo09 
%B-N,%B-2N$Calculated %|b{+-}n=26.3 and %|b{+-}2n=0.47 in 2003Mo09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=26.3, %|b{+-}2n=0.47 (2003Mo09) 
T$measured by 2015Lo04 from the analysis of the (implanted ions)|b correlated decay curve in time and position. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=26.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=48, %|b{+-}2n=5 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=20.4 ms, %|b{+-}n=75.6, %|b{+-}2n=0.9 (2016Ma12) 
$Only one count was assigned to {+113}Zr, with the spectrometer setting on Nb, and one event for setting on Pd. Probability of misidentification of this isotope is 0.31% (2018Sh11) 
$Production |s=0.05 pb, 30% systematic uncertainty for one event with setting on Nb. 
E$it is assumed that the observed event corresponds to ground-state activity. 
J$5/2+ from |W{-|n}=5/2+ orbital proposed in 2019Mo01 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight of 550 ns given in 2018Fu08. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical values of 26.2 ms (2019Mo01) and 20.4 ms (2016Ma12). From a general decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number, T{-1/2} for {+113}Zr is expected to be <40 ms, based on measured half-lives of 37.5 ms for {+110}Zr, 24 ms for {+111}Zr, and 30 ms {I+30-10} for {+112}Zr, available in literature. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T from 2017Su26, based on the production yield systematics of neighboring isotopes, the tof, and in-flight decay; the estimated counts of {+81}Nb was 2080 in the {+124}Xe+Be, E=345 MeV/A, reaction and tof=440 ns, and assumed observation limit of 1 count. Others: <200 ns (2001Ki13 - from parent-daughter time correlation), <80 ns (1999Ja02 - assuming the observation limit of 1 count and expected yield relative to the neighboring isotopes). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ weighted average of 48 ms {I+8-6} (2001Ki13) and 52 ms {I6} (2001Ga24). Earlier result from 2001Ga24: 50 ms {I4} (1998Lo17,1999Lo07) 
J$possible superallowed Fermi decay to 0+ (log {Ift}=3.52 {I14}) (2002Fa13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$ from |g(t) in {+9}Be({+107}Ag,x|g) (2008Ga04) 
J$ from comparison with shell-model calculations (2008Ga04), a 5+ T=0 state lies just above the T=1, 4+ state, whereas T=0, 6+ state lies much higher. Possible configuration=|n5/2[422]~#|p5/2[422], K|p=5+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$ Isomeric ratio (defined above), R=78 {I77} (2009Ga40) 
$ Proposed configuration=|n5/2[422]~#|p5/2[422] 
T$ from |g(t) (2009Ga40). Other: 92 ns {I17} (2008Ga04) (133 ns {I25} is stated as mean lifetime in 2008Ga04); 80 ns 50 (2007Ca26) from |g(t). 
$ Possible configuration=|n5/2[422]~#|p5/2[422], K|p=5+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.8 s {I2} (2009St04) and 4.1 s {I3} (1988Ku14). 
J$expected allowed |b{++} transition to the 77-keV, J|p=(7/2+) level in {+83}Zr is consistent with J|p=(5/2+,7/2+,9/2+). Systematics of N=41 isotones and comparison of the observed rotational bands with projected shell model calculations suggests J|p=(5/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+,3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 9.5 s {I10} (2003Do01) and 12 s {I3} (1977Ko05) 
J$(M1) |g from (2+,3+); log| {Ift}=5.9 to 2+. 2003Do01 proposed (1,2,3)+ from strong |b feeding to 2+ in {+84}Nb decay to {+84}Zr; 2000Ch07 listed (2+), 1999Ma23 listed 3+ and 2009St04 proposed (1+) from some evidence of ground state to ground state |b decays in {+84}Mo -->{+84}Nb -->{+84}Zr chain. Note that (E1) |g from 48.0, (3-,4-) level is inconsistent with 1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from timing of the 50.1|g from the decay of {+85}Nb; weighted average of 20.9 s {I7} (1988Ku14) and 17 s {I2} (2005Ka39). Value of 2.3 min {I3} from 1982De36 is in severe disagreement 
J$from systematics of odd-A Nb nuclides. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,T$possible isomer reported by 1998Oi02 in Ni({+32}S,X) reaction at 165 MeV. Measured |g, |b-gated |g spectra, half-life. IGISOL facility at Jyvaskyla. Delayed |g rays reported at 166, 272, 423, 434, 484, 532, 538, 590, 610, 660, 709 and 759 keV. These |g rays are from A=85 spectra, thus some of these could belong to the decay of {+85}Mo. The identification of this isomer is considered as tentative. In the later work (2005Ka39) shared by some of the common authors, this isomer was not discussed. Instead, 2005Ka39 found evidence for for a 3.3-s isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$from systematics of odd-A Nb nuclides (2005Ka39) 
T$from 2005Ka39 
E$150 {I80} proposed from syst (2012Au07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (41/2+)
level_comment:
E$member of the 9/2+ band as a fork-type structure, two 41/2+ states are produced, this 41/2+ member seems to be part of the non-collective terminating structure, while the other 41/2+ state at 8960+X keV seems to be a continuation of the rotational band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (45/2+)
level_comment:
E$continuation of 9/2+ band as a fork-type structure. This level is interpreted (1999Jo01) as a terminating 45/2+ state with configuration= |p[(g{-9/2}){+3}(p{-1/2}){+-2}]{-21/2+}~#(|ng{-9/2}){+4}(12+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 41/2+
level_comment:
E$member of the 9/2+ band as a fork-type structure, two 41/2+ states are produced, this 41/2+ member seems to be part of the non-collective terminating structure, while the other 41/2+ state at 8960+X keV seems to be continuation of the rotational band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (45/2+)
level_comment:
E$continuation of 9/2+ band as a fork-type structure. This level is interpreted (1999Jo01) as a terminating 45/2+ state with configuration=|p[g{-9/2}{+3}p{-1/2}{+-2}]{-21/2+}~#|ng{-9/2}{+4}(12+) 
E$10481.6 in table 1 of 1999Jo01 seems a misprint 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$evaluators assume 88-s, (6+) activity as the g.s., although a strict evidence for its assignment to g.s. is lacking 
J$from systematics and in-beam experiments (1997Ta10,1999Co10). J|p=5+ proposed earlier is not supported by more recent experiments (2000DoZV). No 6+ to 5+ transition is seen by 1997Ta10 
T$from 1985Wa10. Others: 87 s {I3} (1982De43), 80 s {I12} (1977Ko05), 84 s {I12} (1974Vo03) are all in agreement but less precise 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-,2-)
level_comment:
E$expected to be a low-spin isomer populated in the |e decay of {+86}Mo, but no T{-1/2} data are available. Unpublished work on {+86}Nb decay to {+86}Zr (2000DoZV) and syst of odd-odd nuclides in this mass region suggest existence of a low-spin isomer 
J$(E1) |g from (1+,2+). 
T$unknown 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$from 1994Sh07 in {+54}Fe({+35}Cl,2pn|g) at E=103 MeV. The half-life is from the decay curve of the Zr K| x ray in coin with 752+915+1003 |g rays in {+86}Zr. From observation of K| x ray in coin with known |g rays of 360, 620, 670, 1039 and 1363 in {+86}Zr, 1994Sh07 suggest that a high-spin level in {+86}Zr at excitation energy above 3 MeV may have been populated by the |e decay of this isomer. However, the existence of this 56-s activity is considered as uncertain by the evaluators since it has not been confirmed in other independent studies. Furthermore, it is possible that the source of {+86}Nb formed by 1994Sh07 is a mixed activity of 88-s, (6+) isomer and a low-spin isomer of unknown half-life populated in {+86}Mo |e decay. No evidence of this isomer was found by 1997Ta10 (2000DoZV) or 2005Ka39. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12-)
level_comment:
E$level proposed (evaluator) based on a 2780+x level in ({+32}S,3pn|g). This replaces 2038+x level in 1991Gr16 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-,2-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$(E1) |g from (1+,2+). 1994Sh07 assigned (0+,1+,2+) based on (M1+E2) assignment for |g from (1+,2+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(M1+E2) |g from (1+). 2+ seems less likely from some evidence of |e feeding to this level (from in-out intensity balance), however, the decay scheme, as proposed by 1994Sh07, cannot be considered as complete in view of a large gap between Q(|b{++}) and highest level proposed in this decay scheme. 1994Sh07 assign (1+) 
T$from |b(49.8|g)(t); uncertainty is statistical (1994Sh07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$Consistent with log{Ift} of 5.34 to (1/2)- level of {+87}Zr and systematics of niobium isotopes, see e.g., {+93}Nb. 
T$weighted average of 3.5 {i2} (1971Do01), 3.9 {i2} (1972Tu03), and 3.7 {i1} (1974Vo03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From 1991Ju05 {+58}Ni({+32}S,3p|g) 
J$from systematics of odd-A niobium isotopes, see e.g., {+93}Nb. Consistent with log{Ift} of 5.6 to (9/2)+ level of {+87}Zr (1991Mi15) 
T$from 2.6 {i1} (1972Tu03) and 2.6 {i1} (1974Vo03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from 1991Ju05, although the different feeding due to the revised level scheme may impact the half-life somewhat 
$g-factor from 1995We03 by impad method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g-factor from +0.41 {i13} (1995We03) by impad method and +0.36 {i11} (1999Te02 as well as 1998Ju02 and 1998Te06 by the same authors) by the recoil distance transient field method. Changes in the level scheme imply a new feeding pattern which leads to a possible small change where which should be addressed. 
T$from 1991Ju05 and may be slightly impacted by revised level scheme 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
$Angular distribution measurements from 1991Ju05 consistent with |DJ=2 for a stretched E2 
T$effective half-life, not corrected for feeding, is 37 ps {I9} (1991Ju05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G$from 1995We03. 
$Since the level scheme has been slightly changed in 2003Pa09 as compared to 1995We03, the feeding pattern of this level has changed which impacts the calculations for the g-factor.This should be revisited experimentally. 
T$from 1991Ju05, although the different feeding due to the revised level scheme may impact the half-life somewhat 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G$from 1995We03 may be slightly impacted by revised level scheme 
T$from 1991Ju05 and may be slightly impacted by revised level scheme 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
$I|g(521)=4.9 {i4}, I|g(879)=6.3 {i6}, I|g(1251)=2.5 {i3} (1991Ju05) ; Evaluator notes a significant discrepency in branching ratios between 2003Pa09 and 1991Ju05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (43/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$Tenative Assignment made assuming this level extended a band structure (1991Ju05), not confirmed in 2003Pa09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (49/2+)
level_comment:
J$Assuming stretched E2 for populating and depopulating transitions, but no experimental verification 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$(8+,9+) from log| {Ift}=5.7 to 8+ and log| {Ift}=6.9, log| {If{+1u}t}=8.1 to 9+. (8+) in analogy with {+90}Nb g.s. 
T$weighted average of 14.56 min {I11} (2009Ga02), 14.4 min {I2} (1984Ox01), and 14.3 min {I3} (1972Ia01). Others: 14.57 min {I6} (1972TuZS, thesis work by second author of 1972Ia01), 1971Do01, 1966Fl03, 1966Hy03, 1964Ko08. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 7.7 min {I1} (1984Ox01) and 7.8 min {I2} (1972Ia01). Others: 7.81 min {I6} (1972TuZS, thesis work by second author of 1972Ia01) 1971Do01. 
J$4 from log {Ift}=7.1 to 3- and log {Ift}=6.9 to 5-. (4-) in analogy with {+90}Nb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
%|e+%|b{++}: if (9/2+) lies above the (1/2-) state, %IT<0.004 if E(9/2+ state)=35 keV 
MOMM1$from g=1.3813 {I12} (NMR on oriented nuclei and |g(|q,H,t), 1997Hi06). 
J$probable allowed |e,|b{++} transition from (9/2+) and systematics of niobium isotopes 
Configuration=|pg{-9/2} (1993Bo33) 
E$probable g.s. (1975SeZX) 
T$from 1969HaZP (also 1975HaYQ). Others: 1.9 h {I2} (1971Ar16), 1.9 h (1966Hy02), 2.0 h (1964Bu11), 1.9 h (1955Ma13), 1.9 h {I3} (1954Di16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=LT;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
Configuration=|pp{-1/2} 
Population from {+89}Mo |e decay is uncertain 
E$from 1975SeZX. Others: E=-30 keV to 30 keV from E|b+ (1970HaZH), 0 {I30} (2011AuZY) 
J$log| {Ift}=5.6 to 3/2- (see also {+89}Nb |b{++} decay), systematics of niobium isotopes. 1/2 in 1997Mo25 calculation probably corresponds to this isomer. 
T$from 1969HaZP (also 1975HaYQ). Others: 78 min {I6} (1971Ar16), 66 min {I4} (1966Ha45), 42 min (1964Bu11), 48 min (1954Di16) 
$%IT<0.002 if E(isomer)=35 keV and if 66-min state lies above the 2.0-h state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=(0), (D) |g to (17/2+) 
T$recoil-distance Doppler shift (1993Bo33). Other: 6 ns {I4} (|g(t),1982Di09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from g=+0.324 {I7} (1994Kr01) in (HI,xn|g) 
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to (17/2+) 
T$from |g(t) (1995Ka06). Others: 14 ns {I2} (1994Kr01), 14 ns {I4} (1982Di09), 15 ns {I5} (1977Sp03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1 |g to (27/2-) 
T$effective half-life not corrected for feeding (1995Za11). Other: <1.4 ps (RDDS 1993Si14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=(2), (E2) |g to (29/2+), |g to (33/2-) 
T$effective half-life not corrected for feeding (1995Za11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) (1995Ka06). Other: 14 ns {I2} (|g|g(t) 1994Kr01) 
G$time differential perturbed |g(|q) following recoil implantation (1994Kr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$J from atomic and molecular beam measurements (1975Ru06,1978Ru04); |p from |m comparison with shell model predictions. 
T$from |b(t) with chemically separated source (1968Pe01). Others in good agreement: 1954On06, 1957Sh32 
MOMM1$from weighted average of +4.961 {I4} (from NMR on oriented nuclei, 1981Ha24) and +4.952 {I4} (from colinear laser spectroscopy (CLS), 2009Ch25); for a latest compilation see 2014StZZ. 
MOME2$from colinear laser spectroscopy (CLS) (2009Ch25,2016St14). Other: +0.046 {I7} (from multiple adiabatic passage NMR on Oriented Nuclei (MAPON), 1998Se01) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+91g}Nb,{+90g}Nb)=+0.011 fm{+2} {I1} (2009Ch25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) (1978Ba18). Others: 61 |ms {I4} (1971Ho27), 73 |ms (1967Iv04). 
MOMM1$from time differential perturbed angular distribution (TDPAD); corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetism (1978Ha52, 2014StZZ) 
J$E2 122.4|g to 8+, member of ((|p1g{-9/2})(|n1g{-9/2}){-1}) multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from L(d,|a)=3 
T$weighted average of 18.97 s {I4} (2011Ki45), 18.82 s {I9} (1969Ge03), 18.84 s {I9} (1971Sm07), and 18.76 s {I10} (1974Co33), |g(t) and ce(t) for the 122-keV transition. Decay of level 124.67 has not been observed. Other: 1978Me03 (18.87 s {I2}, statistical uncertainty only). 
MOMM1$From colinear laser spectroscopy (CLS) (2009Ch25, 2014StZZ). 
MOME2$From colinear laser spectroscopy (CLS) (2009Ch25, 2016St14). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+91g}Nb,{+90m}Nb)=+0.042 fm{+2} {I2} (2009Ch25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) with Ge(Li) (1974Ha50). Others: 6.3 ms {I2} (1974Co33 ce(t)), 6.3 ms {I2} (1977DeXV), 6.44 ms (1967Iv04). 
J$from log {Ift}=5.3 in |e decay from 0+ parent, E3 257.3|g to 4- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 477 ns {I10} from ({+31}P,3pn|g), 440 ns {I20} from (|a,3n|g) and 415 ns {I67} from ({+124}Xe,X|g) 
MOMM1$from time differential perturbed angular distribution (TDPAD); corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetism (1978Ha52, 2014StZZ) 
J$(E2) 71.1|g to (9-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=9.95 mb/sr {I21} (2012Th12) 
E$value is 10 keV above 2125.6 keV given in Adopted Levels. The peak appears at 8408 keV in {+90}Nb excitation spectrum (2012Th12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$5072 {I25} (1991Ja04). 
E$IAS. The peak appears at 11309 keV in {+90}Nb excitation spectrum (2012Th12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
L$rather poor fit to data assuming configuration=((|p 1g{-9/2})(|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}) or configuration=((|p 1g{-7/2})(|n 1g{-9/2}){+-1}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$Isomeric ratio R=16% {I3} (2017Pa35) 
T$From |g(t) in 2017Pa35; gating |g-ray transitions were not specified by the authors 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,d)=4 on 0+ target; L({+16}O,{+15}N)=5 on 0+ target with 1/2- ejectile. 
T from activity of mass-separated source (1982Na17) assuming T{-1/2}({+94}Nb)=2.03|*10{+4} y {I16}. 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear LASER spectroscopy (2011StZZ from 2009Ch25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+91g}Nb,{+91m}Nb)=+0.040 fm{+2} {i3} (2009Ch25). 
%|e+%|b{++}: from {+91}Nb IT decay (60.86 d). 
J L({+3}He,d)=1 on 0+ target; M4 105|g to 9/2+. 
T from {+91}Nb IT decay (60.86 d). 
MOMM1 From collinear LASER spectroscopy (2011StZZ; from 2009Ch25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 1581|g to 9/2+ g.s.; log| {Ift}=7.2 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.4) from 9/2+ parent; Hauser-Feshbach analysis in (p,n). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=7.0 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.2) from 9/2+ parent; (M1+E2) 1637|g to 9/2+ g.s.; Hauser-Feshbach analysis in (p,n). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2 from Hauser-Feshbach analysis in (p,n|g); 1963|g to 9/2+ g.s.; L({+3}He,d)=1,(2) on 0+ target. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J Q+O 1984|g to 9/2+ g.s.; configuration=((|p p{-1/2})(g{-9/2}){+2}13/2-) (1975Br01) (supported by measured g factor). 
T from (|a,2n|g). 
MOMM1 From TDPAD (1989Ra17, from +8.19 {I26} based on g-factor=1.26 {I4} (1976Ba02) and other unpublished data). Differs from +9.14 {I13} (2011StZZ and 2005St24, from 1977ZaZW). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J (E2) 50|g to (13/2-); isomeric state expected with configuration=((|p p{-1/2})(g{-9/2}){+2}17/2-) (1975Br01). 
T from |g(t) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) (1976Br14,1975Br01). Others: 3.4 |ms {I1} from time-dependent perturbed angular distribution in ({+6}Li,3n|g) (1977Ha49), 3.8 |ms {I2} from |g(t) in (|a,2n|g) (1974Be36). 
MOMM1 From DPAD in ({+6}Li,3n|g) (1977Ha49). Other |m: +10.81 {I15} from DPAD in (|a,2n|g) (1979Pl05) (both values are listed in 1989Ra17 and 2011StZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J stretched E2 2291|g to 9/2+. E consistent with that expected for ((g{-9/2}){+3})13/2+ state (1975Br01). 
T from DSA in (|a,2n|g). 0.12 ps {I+4-3} from (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 626|g to (17/2-) 2034; configuration=((|p p{-1/2})(g{-9/2}){+2}15/2-) state expected at comparable energy (1974Gl01). 
T from Doppler shift in ({+6}Li,3n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=7.2 (log| {If{+1u}t}=8.2) from 9/2+ parent; Hauser-Feshbach and IAR analysis in (p,n|g); 1606|g to 5/2- 1187. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J E2 819|g to (13/2)+ 2291; D 450|g to J|>15/2, 2661; E consistent with that calculated for ((g{-9/2}){+3})17/2+ state (1974Gl01). 
T from ({+6}Li,3n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J stretched E2 357|g to (17/2)+ 3110. E consistent with that calculated for ((g{-9/2}){+3})21/2+ state (1974Gl01). 
T from |a-357ce(t) in (|a,|a'2n|g). 
|m: from integral perturbed angular distribution (1989Ra17, from 1977Ba34). Value rounded to +12 {I2} in 2011StZZ. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)
level_comment:
J |DJ=1, D(+Q) 254|g to (19/2-) 4097; (D+Q) 885|g to (21/2)+ 3467. 2316|g to (17/2-) 2034 favors |p=- but level included in |p=+ sequence in ({+19}F,4n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J intraband |DJ=1, D(+Q) 185|g to (23/2+) 4848. 
T from 185|g(t) in ({+16}O,2np|g) (1985An23); attributed to 5455 level there, but 185|g is now placed from the 5034 level instead, so measured T{-1/2}is presumed to arise from the 5034 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 421|g to (25/2+) 5034; 608|g to (23/2+) 4848. J=25/2 proposed in (|a,2n|g) based on a placement of the 186|g which is not confirmed in ({+19}F,4n|g) and, consequently, not adopted here. 
T see comment on 5034 level T{-1/2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_comment:
J D 2077|g to (21/2+) 3467. However, DCO(2077|g) from ({+19}F,4n|g) is unexpectedly low for a D, |DJ=0 transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,d)=2. Analysis of (p,p) IAR (1969Sc22). 
E unweighted average of data (uncertainty unstated) in (p,p),(p,p'),(p,p'|g) IAR. 
Analog of {+91}Zr g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,d)=4 for 0+ target. J=9/2 is eliminated if analog state assignment is correct. 
Probable analog of {+91}Zr 7/2+ 3469 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T from {+6}Li-|g(t) (1976Br14). Other: 3.4 |ms {I1} from time-dependent perturbed angular distribution (1977Ha49). 
G From time-dependent perturbed angular distribution (1977Ha49). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J from 1985An23; 1976Br14 could not rule out J=19/2. 
T from Doppler shift observed in ({+6}Li,3n|g) (1976Br14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G From time-differential perturbed angular distribution (1976Ba02). 
T from |a-|g(t) (1976Ba02). Other: 8 ns {I2} (1976Ba50). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T from |a-|g(t) (1974Be36). 
G From time-differential perturbed angular distribution (1979Pl05; diamagnetic correction applied, Knight shift of 0.6% {I3} assumed). Consistent with expected value for configuration=((|p g{-9/2}){+2} (|p p{-1/2})) (1979Pl05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L 4,(3) from 1970Kn05. Others: L=3 (1969Ca20), L=2 (1969Pi05). 
(2J+1)C{+2}S: 0.34 if L=4 (1970Kn05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
Analog of {+91}Zr 5/2+ g.s. 
Proton decay of state observed; relative branching to {+90}Zr g.s. and first excited state is >99 and <1, respectively (1979Fi02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
Analog of {+91}Zr 7/2+ 1882 level. 
Proton decay of state observed; relative branching to {+90}Zr g.s. and first excited state is 10 {I3} and 90 {I13}, respectively (1979Fi02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_comment:
J inconsistent with proposed D 730|g deexcitation to (21/2-) 5543. J=(19/2 to 23/2) if J(5543) is correct. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_comment:
E from 2007Va01. 
J Analog of {+91}Zr (11/2)- 2170 level. T{-1/2}-p coin spectra reveal p emission to {+90}Zr g.s. (45% {I3}), the lowest-energy 5-(+ 2+) doublet (14% {I3}; isotropic angular correlation) and to the first 3- state (41% {I10}) (2001Va10). 
Spectroscopic factor: 0.038 to 0.052 depending on assumed wave function binding energy; consistent with spectroscopic factor for {+91}Zr parent state (2007Va01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
%|b{+-}: no |b{+-} decay observed or expected. The only energetically possible transition is a seventh-forbidden branch to 0+ {+92}Mo(g.s.). Systematics for log| {Ift} values for such a transition have not been established, but log| {Ift} must significantly exceed 22.5, the lowest value known for a 4th forbidden decay; this would imply %I|b<2|*10{+-6}, so this decay mode can be ignored. 
MOMM1,MOME2$from LASER spectroscopy using optical pumping in ion beam cooler buncher (2009Ch25). 
|D<r{+2}>({+91}Zr,{+92}Zr)=+0.127 fm{+2} 3 (2009Ch25). 
J J=7 from LASER spectroscopy (2009Ch25); L=2 in (p,d), (d,t), ({+3}He,|a) on 9/2+ target. Supported by log| {Ift}=14.4 for |e decay to 4+ which is high for |DJ|<2 but typical for |DJ=3, |D|p=no transitions (see 1998Si17); absence of IT decay from (2)+ 135; J=7 favored in ({+3}He,t). 
T weighted average of: 3.6|*10{+7} y 3 (1978Ne04) [if |s=877 mb 42 for {+93}Nb(n,2n){+92}Nb(g.s.) at E(n)=14.8 MeV], 3.2|*10{+7} 6 (1977Ma45), and 3.3|*10{+7} y 5 (1977Ma45) [if T{-1/2}({+94}Nb)=2.03|*10{+4} y 16]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%|e+%|b{++}: both IT decay (|DJ=5) and |b{+-} decay to (0+ {+92}Mo g.s.) are energetically possible but have not been observed. log| {Ift} values as low as 10.6 are known (1998Si17) for second-forbidden decays; this implies %|b{+-}<0.005, compatible with an upper limit of 0.05% reported by 1951Pr20. 
MOMM1 2011StZZ from 1981Ha24, NMR on oriented nuclei; based on g factor=3.068 {I2}, assuming J=2. Value is relative to {+93}Nb. Calculation: 1998Jo17. 
J L=2 in (p,d),(d,t) on 9/2+; log| {Ift}=6.17 for |e decay to 2+ level in {+92}Zr but >10.0 to 4+ level; D+Q 954|g from (1)+ 1089. 
T weighted average of 10.14 d {I3} (1968Re04), 10.16 d {I3} (1962Bu16) and 10.15 d {I3} (1959We30). Other: 10.9 d {I5} (1985He18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
MOMM1$perturbed angular distribution (1974Le05); from measured g-factor assuming J=2; no Knight shift correction applied. 
J |p=- from L=1 in (|a,t),({+3}He,d); E1 90|g to (2)+; |DJ=1 164|g from (3)- 390. 
T from 1978Ba18 (|g,n). Others: 5.9 |ms {I5} (1958Du80) (|g,n); 6 |ms {I1} (1969Iv02), 7.0 |ms {I11} (1968Iv02), 4.3 |ms {I5} (1971Co06), 5.0 |ms {I10} (1972Ku03), (p,n|g). The weighted average of all data is 5.72 |ms {I25}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (p,d),(d,t),({+3}He,|a) on 9/2+; |DJ=1 M1(+E2) 150|g to (2)+ 136. 
T from DSA measurement (1974BrXM) in (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (p,d) on 9/2+; stretched E2 |g to 7+ g.s. 
T weighted average of 1.89 ns {I6} (1971Co06) in (p,n|g) and 1.92 ns {I5} (1988BeYU) in (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J |DJ=1 M1 |g rays to (3)+ and (5)+; L(d,t)=2 for 9/2+ target. 
T from DSA measurement (1974BrXM) in (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J J=2 to 7 from L(d,t)=2 on 9/2+; |DJ=1 501|g to (7)+ g.s. 
T from DSA measurement (1974BrXM) in (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J 749|g is polarized, so J|=0 (1979Ba54 in (p,n|g)); 703|g from (1)- 1678; (1+,2-) from |s(E) in (p,n|g). However, J=0 suggested in (p,n). 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 864|g to (2)- 225; |DJ=2 804|g to (3)+ 286; L({+3}He,d)=2 for 5/2+ target. 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_comment:
J J|p=(1-,2,3) from D+Q 175|g to (1+,2-) 975 and 760|g to (3)- 390; |s(E) in (p,n|g) favors 1- but |s(E) in (p,n) favors 2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-,3-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J J=(1,2,3) from |g(|q) in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g); IAR enhancement for 1311+1324 doublet in (p,n) suggests 2-,3- for both states; |s(|q) in ({+3}He,t) resembles that for (2)- 226 state. 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)-
level_comment:
J L=1 in ({+3}He,d) on 5/2+ target; IAR enhancement for 1311+1324 doublet in (p,n) suggests 2-,3- for both states. 1098|g to (2)- 225. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J J=(2) from |DJ=1 d 1060|g to (3)+ 286 and (D) 1210|g to (2)+ 136; L=(4) in (d,t) on 9/2+ target; IAR enhancement in (p,n) suggests 1-,2+. However, |g(|q) in (|a,xn|g) not consistent with that in (p,n|g). 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J D 934|g to (4)+ 480; J=5 eliminated in |g(|q), |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g). 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J D+Q |DJ=1 1033|g to (3)- 390; |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g) eliminates J=2; |d(1033|g) favors |D|p=no. 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J L(d,t)=(0) for 9/2+ target; 1083|g to (3)- 390. 
E differs from 1468 level because different |g rays deexcite it. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2,3)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J (2,3) from |g(|q), |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g), (|a,xn|g); J=(1) from |s(E) in (p,n|g); |g rays to (3)- and (2)-. 1556 doublet in (p,n) has a (1-) component. 
T from |g|g coin in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_comment:
J 1556 doublet in (p,n) probably has a J=4 component; L=2 in (d,t) for 9/2+ target; |g ray to (3)+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
J L=1 in ({+3}He,d) on 5/2+ target; |g rays to (1)+ and (3)- and (3)+. However, |s(E) in (p,n|g) suggests J=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
E differs from 1738.2 level in (p,n|g) only if the latter has |p=+. 
J 1- to 4- from L({+3}He,d)=1 for 5/2+ target. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
E from (p,n|g). Identical to 1730 level in ({+3}He,d) if |p=-. 
J (3+) probable from IAR enhancement in (p,n); |s(E) in (p,n|g) favors J=0,3. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (-)
level_comment:
J L(d,t)=1 on 9/2+ for probable doublet. |p=(+) for adjacent levels, so probably |p=- for this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J stretched E2 116|g to (9-); absence of |g to J<9 in ({+7}Li,3n|g). 
T from ({+7}Li,3n|g). 
MOMM1$differential perturbed angular distribution (1989Ra17 from 1977Br12; TDPAD); from g-factor in ({+7}Li,3n|g), assuming J=11. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J stretched D |g to (9-); ({+7}Li,3n|g) systematics disfavor transition to higher J; |p=- favored based on competition between transitions from (11+) 2998 to this level and to the (9+) 2287 level (1977Br12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J stretched Q 2287|g to 7+ g.s.; J{-f}|<J{-i} expected in ({+7}Li,3n|g); absence of |g to J<7 levels or to (7-) or (9)- levels. 
L(p,d)=(2+4) at E=2292 {I12}; this level could account for L=4 component. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
J from |s(|q) in high energy (|a,d) and reaction systematics. Proposed configuration=((|n h{-11/2})(|p g{-9/2}))10- (1988La18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12,13)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J |g to (13)+; J=(12,13) suggested in ({+7}Li,3n|g) based on apparent non-yrast character of level (1977Br12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
J if isobaric analog of {+92}Zr g.s.; L=(2) in ({+3}He,d); ({+3}He,t) microscopic DWBA favors 0+; L(p,n)=0. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J possible isobaric analog of 934 state in {+92}Zr; L=(2) in ({+3}He,d) on 5/2+ target. 
|G corresponds to T{-1/2}=1.40 x 10{+-20} s 8. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E from Adopted Levels; 1996Gr07 and 1988An11 identify level in spectrum of fig. 1 but do not specify its energy. 
Possible analog of 2+ {+92}Zr(934). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J=3,5 from |g(|q). J=3 rejected because it would imply J(g.s.)|<5 (unlikely, given T{-1/2} and decay mode of g.s. and 136 (2)+ level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E 90.4 keV {I2} |g to 135.5 {I4} level. 
J from Adopted Levels. 
T from 1978Ba18. Other: 5.9 |ms {I5} (1958Du80). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=|p[(p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1})g{-9/2}{+4}]~# |n(g{-9/2}{+-1}d{-5/2}g{-7/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,d)=4; J=9/2 from optical spectroscopy (1947Me27,1976Fu06). 
MOMM1 from NMR and optical spectroscopy (1989Ra17); value relative to {+45}Sc and based on data of 1951Sh33 and 1947Me27. 
MOME2 from hyperfine structure in muonic {+93}Nb (1989Ra17, from data of 1973Po15). Other: -0.366 {I18} from atomic beam (without polarization correction) (1989Ra17). 
CONF |p g{-9/2}. 
|D<r{+2}>({+91g}I|b normalization,{+93}Nb)=+0.312 {I2} (2009Ch25) from LASER spectroscopy (optical pumping in ion beam cooler buncher); authors also report isotope shift and hfs coefficients. 
<r{+2}>{+1/2}(charge)=4.3241 {I15} (2004An14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 744|g to 9/2+ g.s.; not 9/2 or 11/2 from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. 
T weighted average of 0.48 ps {I5} from {+93}Nb(|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV and 0.57 ps {I7} from from Coulomb excitation. Other: >0.7 ps from (|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J L=3 component of L(p,|a)=3+2 doublet; Q 780|g to 1/2- 31. 
T from (|a,p|g); T{-1/2}<14 ns from (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 13/2 from Coulomb excitation; stretched E2 950|g to 9/2+ g.s. Supported by L(p,|a)=6. 
T other values 2.3 ps {I7} from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV; possibly low as a result of unknown feeding effects in (|g,|g') (2007Or01). 
CONF |n(d{-5/2}{+2}) |p(g{-9/2}) suggested by 2007Wa45 and 2009Ho07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 979|g to 9/2+ g.s.; 11/2 from 979|g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. 
T weighted average of 0.236 ps {I28}, 0.256 ps {I26}, 0.31 ps {I7} from DSAM in Coulomb excitation and 0.33 ps {I6} from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV. The unweighted average of these data is 283 fs {I22}. Other: 0.50 ps {I+24-13} from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J L=4 in ({+3}He,d); J=9/2 from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation; J=9/2,13/2 from (|g,|g') E=6465 keV. 
T >2.8 ps from DSAM in Coulomb excitation. Other T{-1/2}: <14 ns and >0.86 ps from (n,n'|g). T{-1/2}=3.5 ps {I5} from measured B(E2) and adopted branching if |d(1082|g)=-2.47 (uncertainty unstated) from 2002Ka05 in Coulomb excitation is correct. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2,5/2,7/2
level_comment:
J D+Q 318|g to 5/2+ 809; J|<7/2 from (|a,p|g). (5/2-) (1992De08) and 5/2+,(7/2+) (1982Av05) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g) favor J=5/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 597|g to 3/2- 687; 1254|g to 1/2- 31 is not M2 from RUL; candidate for 5/2- member of 2-phonon isoscalar quintet (2010Or01). However, (1/2+) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D 318|g to 11/2+ 979; D(+Q) 553|g to 7/2+ 744; M1+E2 1297|g to 9/2+ g.s. 
T from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV. Others: 0.26 ps {I+8-5} from (n,n'|g), 0.21 ps {I+21-7} from Coulomb excitation (DSAM). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D+Q 572|g to 7/2+ 744; M1+E2 507|g to 5/2+ 809; J=5/2 from |g(|q) (1982Av05) in (n,n'|g). Supported by L({+3}He,d)=(2) for E=1330 {I10} level. However, |p=- from excit and J|p=7/2- from statistical analysis by 1992De08 in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J stretched E2 385|g to 13/2+ 950; J=17/2 from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 
CONF |n(d{-5/2}{+2}) |p(g{-9/2}) suggested by 2007Wa45 and 2009Ho07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J L(p,|a)=3; D+Q 683|g to 3/2- 687; D+Q 559|g to 5/2- 810. This is probably the L=(3) component of the L=(1+3), E=1320 {I40} doublet in (d,{+3}He). However, J|p=(3/2+) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J D+Q 585|g to 5/2- 810; 708|g to 3/2- 687; candidate for 7/2- member of quintet of 2-phonon isoscalar excitations (2010Or01). However, in (n,n'|g), |g(|q) favors 5/2 and statistical analysis suggests (7/2+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D+Q 1483|g to 9/2+ g.s.; D+Q 675|g to 5/2+ 808; |p=(+) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 
T weighted average of 47 fs {I4} from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV and 45 fs {I3} from (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J M1+E2 541|g to 13/2+ 950; 156|g to 17/2+ 1335; J=15/2 from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); |g from 11/2(+). Some statistical analyses in (n,n'|g) give conflicting assignments (9/2+ or 17/2+). 
CONF |n(d{-5/2}{+2}) |p(g{-9/2}) suggested by 2009Ho07. 
Other T{-1/2}: >0.52 ps from (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D,E2 690|g to 5/2- 810, D(+Q) 1500|g to 9/2+ g.s., 521|g to 11/2+ 980 imply J|p=(7/2+,9/2-); candidate for 9/2- member of 2-phonon isoscalar-excitation quintet (2010Or01). However, J=7/2 deduced from 1500|g(|q) by 1982Av02 in (n,n'|g). 
T from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV. Other: >0.96 ps from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J 859|g to 7/2+ 744; 625|g to 11/2+ 979; (7/2-,9/2-) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 
Possibly the same level as that adopted at 1603.8 keV even though J|p from (n,n'|g) differs. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 521|g to 9/2+ 1083; M1+E2 654|g to 13/2+ 949; D,E2 860|g to 7/2+ 744. J=11/2,13/2 from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(+),7/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D+Q 364|g to 5/2+ 1315; D(+Q) 936|g to 7/2+ 744; 1680|g to 9/2+ g.s. However, 9/2+,11/2+ (1992De08) and (5/2,7/2) (1973Va09) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 704|g to 11/2+ 979; M1+E2 939|g to 7/2+ 744. 9/2+ from 939|g and 1682|g excit in (n,n'|g); 5/2+ from excit for 704|g to 11/2+ in (n,n'|g) is disregarded by evaluator because 704|g is complex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 707|g to 11/2+ 980; D+Q 737|g to 13/2+ 950; D,E2 1686|g to 9/2+ g.s.; J=13/2 from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (LE7/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D,E2 964|g to 5/2+ 809 and possible 318|g to (1/2+,3/2+) 1454 level imply J|p=(1/2+,3/2,5/2,7/2+); (5/2+) favored by statistical model analysis in (n,n'|g). If J|p=(1/2+) and D,E2 646|g is correctly placed, J(1127)=7/2, as proposed in (p,2n|g), is very improbable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) gammas to 3/2- 687 and 5/2- 810 so J=3/2,5/2; (5/2-) favored by statistical model analysis in (n,n'|g); large B(M1)(W.u.) and small B(E2)(W.u.) for 969|g to 5/2- one-phonon 810 level support proposed structure. 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 477|g to 17/2+; (19/2-) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). (19/2+) proposed in (p,2n|g), but justification is unclear. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 1153|g to 3/2- 687; D+Q 1030|g to 5/2- 810. Large B(M1)(W.u.) for 1153|g to the 3/2- 687 one-phonon state along with level's proximity to the 5/2- 1780 mixed-symmetry level may favor a J=3/2 assignment (2006Or09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+,11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 1911|g to 9/2+ g.s. From statistical analysis in (n,n'|g), J|p=(7/2+,9/2+) (1992De08), 7/2+ (1982Av05). 
T weighted average of 168 fs {I14} from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV and 139 fs {I+28-21} from (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D+Q 600|g to 5/2+ 1315; D(+Q) 833|g to 9/2+ 1083. However, (9/2-) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2,5/2,7/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 1138|g to 5/2- 810. Statistical analysis in (n,n'|g) favors (3/2+,5/2+) (1992De08), but 2010Or01 in (p,2n|g) suggest 7/2(-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D+Q 1141|g to 5/2+ 808; 971|g to 11/2+ 980. However, 9/2+ (1992De08) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1950|g to 9/2+ g.s. and 346|g to 11/2+ 1604 in (p,2n|g) favor J|p=(7/2+,9/2,11/2,13/2+); J=11/2 for E=1951 {I3} level from |g(|q) for D 4514|g from 11/2(+) in (|g,|g') E=6465 keV. However, (5/2-) (1992De08) from statistical analysis (poor fit) in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
J 477|g to 15/2+ 1491, 365|g to 11/2+ 1603 imply J|p=(11/2+,13/2,15/2+); (11/2-,13/2-) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 1019|g to 13/2+ 949; |DJ|<2 1225|g to 7/2+ 743. However, (11/2-,13/2-) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 
T from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV. Other: 111 fs {I+24-21} from (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J (M1+E2) 1053|g to 13/2+ 949; 502|g to 9/2-. However, J=15/2 (1982Av05) from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g), and statistical analyses in (n,n'|g) give 9/2- or 17/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+,11/2+)
level_comment:
J 1087|g to 13/2+ 950; 537|g to (9/2-) 1500; (9/2+,11/2+) (1992De08) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2,7/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) 1289|g to 5/2- 811; 704|g to (7/2-) 1396. However, J|p=(3/2+) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 1379|g to 7/2+ 744; M1+E2 1144|g to 11/2+ 979. 
T weighted average of 113 fs {I21} from (|g,|g'): E<2.75 MeV and 80 fs {I+21-14} from (n,n'|g) (2007Or01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (GE7/2)
level_comment:
J 1154|g to 11/2+ 980. (5/2+,7/2+) from excit in (n,n'|g), but based on only two data points so may not be reliable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+,13/2,15/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1184|g to 11/2+ 980; 672|g to 15/2+ 1491. However, J|p=(9/2+) from statistical analysis (1992De08) and (17/2+) from excit (1973Va09) in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D,E2 1361|g to 5/2+ 809; D,E2 1222|g to 13/2+ 950. However, J|p=(13/2+) from statistical analysis (1992De08) and (15/2+) from excit in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)-
level_comment:
J E1 689|g to 15/2+ 1491; 573|g from (19/2+) 2753; consistent with log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5 from 21/2+. However, statistical analysis of a 689|g, whose second placement in (n,n'|g) is from a 2180 level, indicates J|p=(7/2+); if correct, a separate level must exist at approximately this energy, but evaluator does not adopt it for lack of supporting evidence. 
CONF |n(g{-9/2}){+2} |p(p{-1/2}){+-1} suggested by 2007Wa45 and 2009Ho07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J 600|g to 11/2+ 1603, 808|g to (7/2-) 1395 imply J|p=(7/2+,9/2,11/2-); (9/2+) from statistical analysis in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 2507|g to 9/2+ g.s., 1528|g to 11/2+ 979, so J|p=(7/2+,9/2,11/2,13/2+). 9/2+ proposed in (p,2n|g) but justification is unclear. 
T from DSAM in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2)+
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=5.0 from 21/2+ 2833; 1262|g to 15/2+ 1491; 1418|g to 17/2+ 1335. 
CONF |n(d{-5/2})(g{-7/2}) |p(g{-9/2}) suggested by 2009Ho07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2)
level_comment:
J stretched Q 906|g to (17/2)- 2180. 
CONF |n(d{-5/2}){+2} |p(g{-9/2}){+2}(p{-1/2}){-1} suggested by 2007Wa45. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2)
level_comment:
J 729|g to (25/2) 3674. 
CONF |n(d{-5/2})(g{-7/2}) |p(g{-9/2})(p{-1/2}){+-1} suggested by 2007Wa45. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2(+)
level_comment:
E alternative E=5144 if order of 1040|g and 760|g is reversed as suggested by authors in ({+16}O,p2n|g). 
J stretched E2 760|g to 25/2(+) 4105. 
CONF |n(d{-5/2}){+2} |p(g{-9/2}){+3} suggested by 2007Wa45. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 33/2(+)
level_comment:
J stretched E2 1040|g to 29/2(+) 4865. 
CONF |n(d{-5/2})(g{-7/2}) |p(g{-9/2}){+3} suggested by 2007Wa45. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 37/2(-)
level_comment:
J Q 1531|g to 33/2(+) 5905; stretch-coupled configuration of |n(d{-5/2})(h{-11/2}) |p(g{-9/2}){+3} suggested by 2007Wa45, and their deformed independent particle model calculations predict |b=-0.14. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|G{-p0}=4 keV {I2} 
E from Zr(p,p). Other: 11020 {I40} from ({+3}He,t). 
E isobaric analog of {+93}Zr g.s. 
J analyzing power in {+92}Zr(pol p,p); L({+3}He,d)=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E isobaric analog of {+93}Zr(947 level). 
J L=0 from interference pattern in excitation functions in {+92}Zr(p,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|G{-p0}=8.0 keV {I8} 
J L({+3}He,d)=2. 
E from Zr(p,p). Other: 12470 {I40} from ({+3}He,t). 
E possible analog of {+93}Zr 1450 or 1425 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|G{-p0}=10 keV {I1} 
J L=0 from interference pattern in excitation functions in (p,p). 
E possible analog of {+93}Zr 1910 or 1918 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|G{-p0}|<2.0 keV 
E possible analog of {+93}Zr(3391 level). 
J L=2 from interference pattern in excitation functions in (p,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|G{-p0}=2.0 keV {I3} 
E possible analog of {+93}Zr(3421 level). 
J from L and analyzing power in Zr(p,p), (pol p,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6000 
E from E(p)=6002.5 {I50} from 1968Th07. 
Other |G: 80 keV {I6} (1968Th07). 
|G{-p0}=45 keV {I5} (1970Ke02), 37 keV {I3} (1968Th07). 
Analog of {+93}Zr(947 level). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6530 
|G{-p0}=8.0 keV {I8}; |G{-p1}=5.2 keV {I15}; |G{-p3}=0.72 keV {I2}; |G{-p4}=1.8 keV {I4}. 
Analog of {+93}Zr 1425 or 1450 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=7025 
|G{-p0}=10 keV {I1}; |G{-p2}=3.5 keV {I11}; |G{-p4}=0.45 keV {I22}. 
Possible analog of {+93}Zr 1910 or 1918 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=7880 
|G{-p0}=14.0 keV {I14}; |G{-p1}=5.4 keV {I18}; |G{-p2}=1.8 keV {I3}; |G{-p3}=3.3 keV {I7}; |G{-p4}=0.71 keV {I25}. 
Possible analog of {+93}Zr 2770 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=8525 
|G{-p0}=2.0 keV {I3}; |G{-p2}=1.0 keV {I5}; |G{-p4}|?14.2 keV. 
Possible analog of {+93}Zr 3421 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J statistical analysis gives 7/2- (1992De06), (5/2-) (1973Va09); 5/2- from |g(|q) assigned by 1982Av05. Adopted J|p=5/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2(+)
level_comment:
|p: from 1973Va09; 1992De08 deduce |p=- which seems unlikely given that |g feeds J|p=13/2(+) 950 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J statistical analysis gives (7/2+) (1992De08); however, 1982Av05 obtain (5/2-) from |g(|q); 708|g to 3/2- favors |p=- if J=7/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) and statistical analysis (1982Av05). However, (9/2+) from statistical analysis by 1992De08 and (17/2+) from excit (1972Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T presumed to supersede 0.81 ps {I21} reported by 2006Or09. 
J (9/2-) from excit (1992De08). However, this conflicts with J=7/2 from 1500|g(|q) (1982Av05) and supported by observed level occupancy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J note, however, that 704|g feeds an 11/2+ level. Evaluator, therefore, considers existence of this level to be doubtful, and adopts a single level at 1682 keV from which the 704|g also is placed (consistent with 1982Av05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J statistical analysis yields (13/2+) (1982Av05), (9/2-,11/2-) (1992De08); 13/2 from |g(|q) (1982Av05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
|p=- from statistical analysis in 1992De08; evaluator does not adopt this because it implies mult(1908|g)=M2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J (7/2+,9/2+) from statistical analysis (1992De08), 7/2 from |g(|q) (1982Av05). Adopted value is 11/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2-,(7/2-) from statistical analysis in 1992De08; evaluator rejects 5/2- because it implies mult(1950|g)=M2. Adopted |p=(+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: +
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(37=10 
d|s/d|W(36|')/d|s/d|W(47|')=0.9 (1962Jo05). 
Adopted |p=+ for 1484 and 1491 levels, (-) for 1500 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D+Q |g to 9/2+; |g(|q) rules out J=9/2 and 11/2 (1972St23). 
T weighted average of 0.61 ps {I11} (1974Le34), 0.55 ps {I14} (1972St23), 0.55 ps {I10} (1974Je04). 
BE2 Weighted average of 0.0168 {I10} (2002Ka05), 0.0188 {I10} (1981Yo07), 0.0180 {I13} (1972Kr02), and 0.0168 {I8} (1972St23). Other: 0.023 ps {I5} (1972An16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from 1981Yo07; 7/2 and 9/2 (also allowed by |g(|q)) are eliminated based on T{-1/2}, B(E2) and |d derived from |g(|q). 
T weighted average of 5.5 ps {I14} (1972St23) and 6.17 ps {I20} calculated from B(E2) and the branching of the 809 transition assuming mult=M1 for the 65 transition. Other: |>1.4 ps (1974Je04). 
BE2 Weighted average of 0.0155 {I10} (2002Ka05), 0.0153 {I8} (1981Yo07), 0.0167 {I12} (1972Kr02), 0.0157 {I8} (1972St23). Others: 0.022 {I5} (1972An16), 0.029 {I6} (1968Ga24; 742 level included). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 13/2 or 7/2 from |g(|q); 7/2 inconsistent with T{-1/2} for any |d. 
T weighted average of 4.2 ps {I14} (1972St23) and 4.36 ps {I15} calculated from B(E2). Other: |>1.4 ps (1974Je04). 
BE2 Weighted average of 0.0265 {I15} (2002Ka05), 0.0236 {I13} (1981Yo07), 0.0247 {I17} (1972Kr02), 0.0230 {I11} (1972St23). Others: 0.031 {I6} (1972An16), 0.019 {I4} (1968Ga24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) allows 5/2, 7/2 or 11/2; only 11/2 is consistent with T{-1/2} (1981Yo07). J=11/2 confirmed from 797|g(|q) (2002Ka05). 
T weighted average of 0.236 ps {I28} (1974Je04), 0.256 ps {I26} (1974Le34), 0.31 ps {I7} (1972St23), . 
BE2 Weighted average of 0.0175 {I15} (2002Ka05), 0.019 {I4} (1968Ga24), 0.0186 {I10} (1981Yo07), 0.0172 {I9} (1972St23), 0.023 {I5} (1972An16). Other: 0.0127 {I11} (1972Kr02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 339|g(|q) limits J to 9/2 (1972St23); 1981Yo07 deduce 5/2, 7/2 or 9/2, but their |g(|q) differs from that of 1972St23. J=9/2 confirmed from 339|g(|q) (2002Ka05). 
BE2 weighted average of 0.0020 {I3} (2002Ka05), 0.00306 {I21} (1981Yo07), 0.00219 {I26} (1972Kr02), 0.0026 {I2} (table 1, 1972St23). Other: 0.0033 {I7} (1972An16). 
T other: >0.7 ps (1972St23). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+,13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 318|g(|q) allows J=9/2 or 13/2 (1981Yo07) 
BE2 Weighted average of 0.0040 {I4} (1981Yo07) and 0.0037 {I3} (table 1, 1972St23). Other: 0.0046 {I9} (1972An16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
Small population of level (0.4% {I2} of total yield of {+93}Nb) suggests a non-yrast character (2007Wa45). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J polarization and |g(|q) exclude 7/2 and favor 11/2 over 9/2. 
WIDTHG Determined from the elastic cross section (1.6 mb {I7}), the ratio of the scattering cross sections at 78|' K and 293|' K (1.022 {I11}), the nuclear selfabsorption ratio (0.004 {I3}), and the g.s. branching ratio (12% {I3}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
Level reported by 2005Mc13 and 2010Or01. 
J 5/2- deduced from (1326|g)(656|g)(|q) (2005Mc13), but a |g|g(|q) data analysis problem necessitated a reanalysis of those data and 3/2- is now recommended by 2010Or01. 
T from 2005Mc13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E inconsistency of E|g for deexciting transitions suggests the possibility of a close doublet at 2171 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2 on 9/2+ target. M3 |g from 3+. Beta decays only to 4+ with log| {Ift}=12.0 
T$from 1959Sc35. Others: 1.8|*10{+4} y {i4} (1955Ro21), 2.2|*10{+4} y {i5} (1953Do18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2 on 9/2+ target. log| {Ift}=6.5 to 2+; log| {Ift}=7.4 to 4+ (log| {If{+1u}t}<8.5 for both transitions). 
T$from 1990Ab06. Other: 6.26 min {i1} (1968Re04), 6.29 min {i5} (1962Ki08). 
$%IT,%|b{+-} from {+94}Nb IT decay (1962Ki08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_comment:
J$M1 to 6+ g.s. J=(7) was suggested by 1965Sh03, 1968Ju01 on the basis of shell-model expectation (only J=7 candidate of the multiplet) and lack of primary feeding. Feeding from (4+,5-) 1230 level argues against J=(7). Not observed in (p,n|g) suggests J>6. In 2000Ma63 it is suggested that the cascade seen represents the yrast positive-parity sequence therefore J=(7). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E1 |g to 3+. 2- from Hauser-Feshbach calculations in (p,n|g) (1977Fe14). 
T$from |g|g(t) in (n,|g) (1971Gu05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=2. M1 |g to 3+. 3+ from Hauser-Feshbach calculations in (p,n|g) (1977Fe14,1976Ha04). 1985Bo48 suggest it to be the 2+ member of multiplet with configuration=((|p 1g{-9/2}){++1}(|n 1d{-5/2}){+-1}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4-)
level_comment:
J$level fed from 4+,5+ capture state and 4+, 5- resonances. Decays to (2)- level. J|p=(5+,6,7) has been suggested in (n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$ measured using multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Mc-ICP-ms) and HPGe detector (2012He11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
$Total intensity=5.4 {I20} per decay, for total cascade energy=7227 to this level; only 25% {I2} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
$Total intensity=6.2 {I15} per decay, for total cascade energy=7186 to this level; only 71% {I2} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_comment:
$Total intensity=7.0 {I11} per decay, for total cascade energy=7169 to this level; only 60% {I1} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_comment:
$Total intensity=5.3 {I15} per decay, for total cascade energy=7114 to this level; only 42% {I2} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
$Total intensity=2.7 {I9} per decay, for total cascade energy=7087 to this level; only 84% {I1} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5)+
level_comment:
$Total intensity=3.2 {I10} per decay, for total cascade energy=6976 to this level; only 57% {I3} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
$Total intensity=5.4 {I11} per decay, for total cascade energy=6831 to this level; only 51% {I3} of it is observed and resolved (2020Kn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11)
level_comment:
$Compiler's note: 1552.0|g to (4)+ makes J=(11) unlikely, so either the spin assignment is questionable or the placement of the 1552|g is incorrect. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$from Limited Relative Statistical Weight, LRSW, analysis (1985ZiZY, 1992Ra09) of the following 12 values: 35 d {i1} (1951EnZZ), 35.0 d {i5} (1953Co23), 35.0 d {i1} (1961Wy01), 35.6 d {i4} (1964WoZZ), 35.8 d {i5} (1965Fl02), 35.0 d {i5} (1965Si16), 35.10 d {i7} (1968La10, published uncertainty of 0.2 divided by 3 to convert from 3|s value), 35.15 d {i3} (1968Re04), 34.97 d {i1} (1976Ha51, published uncertainty of 0.3 divided by 3 to convert from 3|s value), 34.979 d {i9} (1980Ho17), 34.98 d {i2} (1982RuZV), and 34.997 d {i6} (1997Ma75). In this LRSW analysis the uncertainty for 1997Ma75 value is increased from 0.006 to 0.0062 to reduce its relative weight to 50%. The resulting internal uncertainty is 0.0044 and the reduced-|h{+2}=1.97. The largest contribution to the reduced-|h{+2} value is from the value of 1968Re04. If the RAJEVAL method (1992Ra08) is applied to these data, the uncertainty for this value is increased from 0.03 to 0.09 and the resulting weighted average is 34.985 d {i5}, whereas the Normalized Residual method (1992Ja06) increased this uncertainty to 0.06 and gives a weighted average of 34.988 d {i6}. These two results are within the range of the adopted value. 
T$Other values: 38.7 d (1945Po01) and the three values 35.045 d {i5} (1969MeZV), 35.00 d {i3} (1970MeZQ), and 34.98 (1980RuZY), all replaced by 1982RuZV. 
MOMM1$N/RD. Others: 6.140 {i6} (1985Oh08. N/rd), 6.143 {i5} (1977Ko31. N/RD; recalculated by 1981Ha55, and 6.004 {i12} (1989Ra19). BFNMR/on (Brute force nuclear orientation with radiative detection of nuclear magnetic resonance)(1989Ra19). 
MOME2$negative from electric quadrupole alignment (V{-zz}) of {+95}Zr+{+95}Nb in a Zr single crystal 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from 1969Fo01 (ce(K)(236|g)(t); |b spect). 
%B-,%IT$from I|b/ce(K)(236|g)=0.10 {i1} (1974An22) and ce(K)/(|g=ce)=0.593 for 236 |g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 799 {I8} ({+3}He,d), 792 {I7} (d,{+3}He) and 807 {I8} (pol t,|a) 
J$from L({+3}He,d)=1 (1973Me02) and L(d,{+3}He)=1 (1974Bi08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1000 {I20} ({+3}He,d), 1000 {I8} (d,{+3}He), 1021 {I8} (pol t,|a) and 1009 {I10} (t,p) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3. J|p=(5/2-) from |s(|q) and a(|q) in (pol t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1223 {I8} ({+3}He,d), 1221 {I12} (d,{+3}He) and 1215 {I8} (pol t,|a) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=1(1974Bi08). J|p=(3/2-) from |s(|q) and a(|q) in (pol t,|a)(1983Fl03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1623 {I12} (d,{+3}He) and 1616 {I8} (t,p) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=1+2 for 1623 doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1662 {I8} (pol t,|a), and 1658 {I8} (t,p) 
J$from (t,p), J=(5/2-) in (pol t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1913 {i8} from (|a,t), 1894 {i8} from (pol t,|a) and 1903 {i15} from (t,p) 
J$L(t,p)=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2165 {I8} from ({+3}He,d), 2149 {I8} (pol. t,|a) and 2165 {I11} (t,p) 
J$from angular momentum transfer in ({+3}He,d); L(t,p)=3 is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
E$from (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=1+3 for E=2328. J|p(2302)=5/2- suggests that this is the 1/2-,3/2- member 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2431 {I8} from ({+3}He,d), 2421 {I8} from (pol. t,|a) and 2435 {I6} (t,p) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
$IAS({+95}Zr 1618, 7/2+,9/2+) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=2+4 for 13.69-MeV doublet. J|p(13601) suggests that this is the 7/2+,9/2+ doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$IAS({+95}Zr 2285) 
J$J|p=1/2+ from |s(|q) in (p,p) and (p,p') discrepant with {+95}Zr J|p=3/2+,5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
$IAS({+95}Zr 2834) 
E$from (p,p),(p,p') IAR 
J$J|p=3/2+ from |s(|q) in (p,p),(p,p') discrepant with L({+3}He,d)=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$from 1969Fo01, where it is given as 86.6 h {i8}; other: 84 h {i2} (1953Sl14), see also 1955Dr43 and several older values cited in 1953Sl14. 
%B-,%IT$from {+95}Nb Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
MOMM1$g=0.8294 {i6} hfs (1986Ed01). Others: g=0.85 {i7} (|g(|q,H,t) (1986Du17,1985DuZX); g=0.8292 {i7} hfs (1985Oh08) 
J$J=6 (|g(|q,~T,~H) (1986Ed01); log| {Ift}=5.8 to 5+ 
T$from 1949Ku18. Other measurement: 23.5 h {i5} (1968An03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$from (pol t,|a); L=4 in ({+3}He,d), (d,{+3}He) 
T$from 1952Ma24. Others: 74 min {I2} (1950Bu54), 75 min {I3} (1940Gr04). 
MOMM1$NMR (1991Be18, also quoted in 1992Be50); other: 7.5 {I14} (1976Kr01). 
Oblate deformation deduced from |m (1991Be18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$from (pol t,|a); L=1 in ({+3}He,d), (d,{+3}He) 
T$from 1992KaZM ({+97}Nb IT decay (58.7 s) dataset); others: 52.7 s {I18} (1990KaZW); 60 {I8} s (1950Bu54) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$7/2+,9/2+,11/2+ from M1+E2 |g to 9/2+, g.s.; M1+E2 |g's from 3/2+,5/2+ 1750 and 1852 levels respectively (both based on L=2); the only way to satisfy both conditions is by assigning 7/2+ for 1148 (this level) and 5/2+ for 1750 and 1852 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$L=2 in ({+3}He,d); M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ 1147.96-keV level; |g|g(|q) ({+97}Zr |b{+-} decay); see also the argument at level 1149 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$level is a multiplet from (d,{+3}He) and (pol t,|a) 
J$|s(|q) in (d,{+3}He) shows L=1 + L=3 admixture. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$adopted values 
T$from 1992KaZM; other: 52.7 s {I18} (1990KaZW) 
%IT$no |b{+-} decay has been reported. The expected limits for |b{+-} decay to levels in {+97}Mo are as follows: <3.0% to 480.90 {I3}/2+ level, <2.0% to 679.59 {I1}/2+ level, <1.8% to 720.92 {I3}/2+ level, etc, for first forbidden transitions based on log| {Ift}>5.9; <12% to 1870 {I3}/2- level, <3.9% to 2092.1 {I3}/2- level, <1.1% to 2267 {I1}/2-,3/2- level, etc, for allowed transitions based on log| {Ift}>3.6. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ng{-7/2} (1975Me13) 
J$log| {Ift}=4.2 from 0+ 
T$from 1976He10. Other: 2.8 s {I2} (1967Hu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+. Strong excitation indicates configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ns{-1/2} (1975Me13) 
E$the ordering of the two L=4 levels (84 and 226) is determined by |s(84)/|s(226)=0.78 compared with a predicted value |s(5+)/|s(4+)=0.26 
T$weighted average of 51.3 min {I4} (1976He10), 50.0 min {I9} (1976Si04), 51.5 min {I10} (1960Or02), and 51 min {I1} (1966Gu05). Others: 51 min {I3} (1962Wa36), and 51 min {I5} (1961Ta08). 1966Gu05 also report a half-life of 1.5 min {I5} for another isomer, which, however, was not observed in later studies in 1969Hu07, 1976Si04, 1976He10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_comment:
E$see comment for 84 level 
J$L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+. Strong excitation indicates configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ns{-1/2} (1975Me13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=2+4; energy and strength are consistent with the values calculated for the 3+ member of the configuration=|pg{-9/2}~#|ng{-7/2} multiplet (1975Me13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J from L and analyzing power in (pol t,|a). 
T from 1972Tr08. Others: 14.3 s {I6} (1970Ei02), 10 s {i2} (1963Tr01) 
MOMM1 Collinear Laser Spectroscopy (2009Ch25) 
Isotope shift |D<r{+2}>=+1.028 fm{+2} {I12} (2009Ch25) 
MOME2 Collinear Laser Spectroscopy (2009Ch25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%IT A very weak |g has been observed in {+99}Zr |b{+-} decay. %IT deduced if B(M4)(W.u.)<30 (RUL). 
J from L and analyzing power in (pol t,|a). 
T$Weighted average of 2.6 min {I2} (1971Ha07), 2.6 min {I2} (1971Ca18), 2.3 min {I3} (1963Tr01), 2.4 min {I3} (1960Or02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g387 to 9/2+, |g628 from (3/2+). 
T$Other: 17 ps {I4} from |g|g and |b|g in |b{+-} decay (1990OhZY) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J from L and the analyzing power in (pol t,|a) and |g546 M1+(E2) from level (3/2)+ at 1015.27 keV. 
T$from |b|g(t) in {+99}Zr decay (1990OhZY). Other: 0.21 ns {I6} (1982Ba36), 0.18 ns {I9} (1997Lh01). 
T$Other: 173 ps {I4} from |g|g and |b|g in |b{+-} decay (1990OhZY) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from L and analyzing power in (pol t,|a) 
T$ Other: 56 ps {I10} from |g|g and |b|g in |b{+-} decay (1990OhZY), 60 ps {I20} (1989Lh01), 0.26 ns {I17} (1997Lh01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T from 1990OhZY. Other value: 40 ps {I13} (1997Lh01). 
J |g462 M1+E2 to (5/2)+, 28.4|g (M1) from (1/2+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |t=228 ps {I1} using GCD method (2023Pf03). Others : |t=236 ps {I16} from slope method and |t=232 ps {I6} from convolution method (2023Ph03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.6 (allowed |b transition) from 0+ parent 
$Probable configuration=|pg{-9/2}|ng{-7/2} 
T$weighted average of 1.5 s {I2} (1976Ah06) and 1.3 s {I2} (1972Tr08). Other: |?1.0 s (1970Ei02). 1969WiZX report 1.7 s {I4} from 600.0|g(t), but this 600|g is seen mostly from |b decay of the 2.99-s isomer. In 1972Tr08 and 1970Ei02, the half-life was incorrectly assigned to {+100}Zr decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$It is assumed by the evaluators that the lowest levels populated in the decay of the 13-|ms isomer, and in (t,{+3}He) correspond to this long-lived isomer 
E$from measured masses of g.s. and isomer (2007Ri01). 2017Au03 give 313 keV {I8}, apparently deduced from cyclotron frequency ratios for the g.s. and isomeric activities with respect to {+97}Zr standard cited by 2007Ha32 from measurements in their 2007Ri01 paper. It does not appear that 2007Ha32 made an independent measurement of the frequencies for {+100}Nb g.s. and the isomer. The 2007Ri01 paper, on the other hand, on page 5 give measured frequencies for the g.s. and the isomer, not the ratios with respect to the {+97}Zr standard, together with the energy of the isomer with an uncertainty of 23 keV. It is not clear to the evaluators whether frequency ratios listed in the 2007Ha32 carry correct uncertainties. Evaluators sent a query email Dec 5, 2020 to one of the main authors of both the papers for clarification of the assigned uncertainty. There has been no reply as of Jan 10, 2021. Evaluators prefer to assign 23 keV uncertainty as given in the 2017Ri01 paper. 
J$allowed log {Ift} value to 2103, 4+ state in {+100}Mo; log {Ift} to 1847,6+ state is direct and possibly allowed (2001Su11). Theoretical structure calculations (2000Lh01) predict 5+ in a spherical basis with configuration=|ns{-1/2}~#|pg{-9/2} 
T$from |g(t) in 1987Me06. Others: 3.1 s {I3} (1976Ah06), 2.4 s (1967Hu09), 2.4 s {I3} (1972He37). 1969WiZX report 3.0 s {I7} from |g(t) of a 246.2|g from {+100}Nb |b{+-} decay, but this |g was not seen in other studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-,5-,6-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$(E1) 34.3|g to (5)+; 185|g(M1)-173|g(M1) cascade from 707,(6-) level. Absence of |g transitions to 261, (4+) and 159, (3+) favors 6-. 
T$weighted average of 0.4 |ms {I1} (2013RuZX,|g|g(t)); 0.46 |ms {I6} (1986LhZX,|g|g(t)); 0.32 |ms {I8} (1970Gr38, x-ray(t)). See also {+100}Nb IT decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.8 (allowed |b transition) from 0+. Also theoretical prediction (2000Lh01) 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+100}Zr |b{+-} decay (2013RuZX). Other: 0.19 ns {I23} (1989Lh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-,6-,7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$M1 185.4|g from (6-). Absence of |g transition to 261, (4+) favors 6- or 7- 
T$|g|g(t) in IT decay (2013RuZX). Other: <1 ns (1986LhZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$possible |pg{-9/2}~#|nh{-11/2} configuration from systematics of N=57 and 59 isotones (1999Ge01). But theoretical calculations (2000Lh01) predict 8+ with |pg{-9/2}~#|ng{-7/2} configuration 
T$from 2013RuZX (|g(t) in IT decay, for 173-, 185- and 359-keV |g rays). Others: 13.0 |ms {I10} (1999Ge01), 12 |ms (1980MoZJ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
E$the ground state in Table I of 1979Aj03, with Q{-0}=-6690 {I30} in (t,{+3}He) seems to corresponds to 314 keV {I23}, which is the energy of the 2.99-s, (5+) isomer measured by 2007Ri01 and 2007Ha32 in precise mass measurements of g.s. and isomer of {+100}Nb, although it is not clear why a high-spin would be preferentially populated in a charge-exchange reaction such as {+100}Mo(t,{+3}He) instead of the 1+ ground state or other known 1+ states by e.g. Gamow-Teller transition. If x=314, then 314, 348, 521, and 735 populated in 12.4-|ms isomer decay match with 0+x, 25+x, 210+x and 410+x levels from (t,{+3}He), respectively, as noted by 1999Ge01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=0.090 
E$the ground state in Table I of 1979Aj03, with Q{-0}=-6690 {I30} in (t,{+3}He) seems to corresponds to 314 keV {I23}, which is the energy of the 2.99-s, (5+) isomer measured by 2007Ri01 and 2007Ha32 in precise mass measurements of g.s. and isomer of {+100}Nb. If x=314, then 314, 348, 521, and 735 populated in 12.4-|ms isomer decay match with 0+x, 25+x, 210+x and 410+x levels from (t,{+3}He), respectively, as noted by 1999Ge01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,J$lowest level in 1999Ge01 likely corresponds to the 2.99-s, (5+) isomer of {+100}Nb, reported by 2007Ri01 and 2007Ha32 at 314 {I23}. 2017Au03 give 313 keV {I8}. Evaluators could not find rationale for low uncertainty in 2017Au03 
T$from the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-,5-,6-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.4 |ms {I1} (2013RuZX,|g|g(t)); 0.46 |ms {I6} (1986LhZX,|g|g(t)); 0.32 |ms {I8} (1970Gr38, x-ray(t)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$possible |pg{-9/2}|nh{-11/2} configuration from systematics of N=57 and 59 isotones (1999Ge01). But theoretical calculations (2000Lh01) predict 8+ with |pg{-9/2}|ng{-7/2} configuration 
T$from 2013RuZX (|g(t) for 173-, 185- and 359-keV |g rays; also reported 11 |ms {I2} from |g(t) for 185|g, using a different analysis). Others: 13 |ms {I1} from 173|g(t)+185|g(t) in 1999Ge01, uncertainty of 5 |ms in Fig. 3 seems a misprint; 12 |ms (1980MoZJ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=8.6 ps {I7}, considered as an upper limit, as 2017Ha12 state that correction for the feeding time into the 9/2+ state could not be deduced due to unresolved doublets 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=0.68 {I3}, Q{-0}=2.75 {I17} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%|b{+-}=100 
J 1976Ah06 proposed a high spin for this level because it decays to levels with spin 3+,4+ and 6+ in {+102}Mo. From mass measurements of 2007Ri01 it is clear that the high spin level is the ground state and not the low spin state. 2007Ha32 claims the opposite but the data of 2007Ri01 are more convincing. J suggested from absence of IT from 1+ isomeric state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%|b{+-}=100; no it decay reported 
E$x=94 {I7} (2012Au07) from mass measurement 
E$x=93 {i23} following 2007Ri01 from mass measurements 
J from allowed |b-transition with log| {Ift}=4.71 from 0+, {+102}Zr g.s. decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$This level is considered by 1998Hw08 as the ground state of 102Nb but is very probably the isomeric state following 2007Ri01. The energy of the isomer would be then 93 {I23} keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E$This level with unknown excitation energy is considered as the lowest energy level to which two |DJ=1 bands finally decay following 2001Hw01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
configuration=5/2[422] Nilsson state (1984Se05,1993Li01,1991Ho16) 
T from 103|g decay curve in the |b{+-} decay of {+103}Nb (1976Ah06,1984Sh03). Other: 1.3 s {I1} (1988PaZV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
configuration=5/2[303] Nilsson state (1984Se05,1993Li01,1991Ho16) 
T$other: 4.7 ns {I5} |g|g(t) in {+103}Zr |b{+-} decay (1984Se05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
configuration=3/2[301] Nilsson state (1984Se05,1993Li01) 
T$other: 2.0 ns {I6} |g|g(t) in {+103}Zr |b{+-} decay (1984Se05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=23.1 ps {I18} given in text and 23.3 ps {I16} in Table III. 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.11 {I5}, Q{-0}=3.3 {I+9-14} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=7.4 ps {I6} 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.12 {I+6-5}, Q{-0}=2.66 {I+52-66} (2017Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=5.4 ps {I9}, considered as an upper limit, as the feeding time into the 13/2+ state was not accounted for 
$g{-K}-g{-R}=1.07 {I+11-9}, Q{-0}=3.93 {I+45-40} (2017Ha12) 


