# LEVEL

level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
T$from |a|g(t) in (t,|a|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$1997VaZT give L=(7) and propose configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1}, which gives J|p=7+ or 8+; however, the error bars for |s(|q) for this level are very large (evaluator) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} and |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(|a,|a')=3. Confirming arguments are L(p,p')=3 and L(d,p)=2+4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(|a,|a')=3. Confirming arguments are L(p,p')=3, and J|p=3- from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for d5/2 allows 2- or 3-. Not excited in (|a,|a') so J|p probably not 3- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for d5/2 allows 2- or 3-. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} + |n1j{-15/2}|nlj{+-1} with a 3p{-1/2}, 2f{-5/2}, or 3p{-3/2} neutron hole state 
J$|g's to 8+. Excitation in (|a,|a') gives natural parity. L(d,{+3}He)=5. Strength in (t,|a|g) rules out 6+ or 10+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for d5/2 allows 2- or 3-. L(d,{+3}He)=2. |g's to 4- and 0+. Non-observation in (|a,|a') is a weak argument against 3-. J|p=2- is given in {+207}Pb(pol p,p') IAR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$|g's to 8+ and 10+. L(d,{+3}He)=5. From strength in (t,|a|g), given the strength observed for the (d,{+3}He) L=5 states with J|p=8+ and 10+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$|g's to 6+, 6-, 8+ 
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} + |n1j{-15/2}|nlj{+-1} with a 3p{-1/2}, 2f{-5/2}, or 3p{-3/2} neutron hole state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_comment:
J$|g from 12+. |g to 10+. No transition to levels with J<10 
$1993Sc08 propose configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
CONF$1996Ye01 propose that this state is the lowest-spin member of the expected quartet of two-phonon octupole states at an energy about twice that of the 3- 2614 state 
J$from E0 to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
T$other: 5.3 fs {I+19-15} from B(E3)=0.13 {I3} in (e,e') and |G{-|g0}/|G=0.0088 {I18} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-5/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$|g's to 3- and 6- allow 4- or 5- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} with a small admixture of configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=0 gives 0- or 1-. S for the 5280 and 5292 L(d,p)=0 levels rules out J|p(5280)=1- given J|p(5292)=1- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2,3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$dipole |g to 3- allows J=2,3, or 4. |g to 0+ and T{-1/2} rule out J=4 and J|p=3+. For J|p=2-, the g.s. transition would have B(M2)(W.u.)=0.48 {I7} and for J|p=3- would have B(E3)(W.u.)=9.3 {I14} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$from (|g,|g'). Other: <2.1 fs from (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$|g's to 3- and 4+. L(d,{+3}He)=5. On the basis of these decay modes, and the strength in (t,|a|g), 1997Sc21 propose J|p=(3+) 
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} + |n1j{-15/2}|nlj{+-1} with a 3p{-1/2}, 2f{-5/2}, or 3p{-3/2} neutron hole state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} + |n1j{-15/2}|nlj{+-1}, with a 3p{-1/2}, 2f{-5/2}, or 3p{-3/2} neutron hole state 
J$|g's to 8+ and 7-. L(d,{+3}He)=5. Strength in (t,|a|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). Confirming arguments are L(|a,|a')=3 and L(d,p)=2+4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_comment:
J$excitation function resonates at |n1j{-15/2} IAR in (p,p'), so |p=+, inconsistent with L(p,p')=5. The evaluator notes that from the |s(|q) of 1975Wa18 L=5 gives the best fit; however, the fit for L=6 is also reasonable 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g to 4-. L(d,{+3}He)=5. The 1387|g to 4- cannot Be M2 (RUL) 
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for d5/2 gives 2- or 3-. Excitation in (|a,|a') rules out 2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_comment:
J$excitation function resonates at |n1j{-15/2} IAR in (p,p'), so |p=+, given the available neutron hole states. L(p,p')=(6,7) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$from (|g,|g'). Other: <3.5 fs from (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} + |n1j{-15/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 5- and 4-. 1997Sc21 propose J|p=5- on the basis of the observed |g decay and the strength of the level in their (t,|a|g) work 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 with both d3/2 and d5/2 components 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} with a small admixture of configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=0. Strength in (d,p) rules out 1- given J|p=1- for the 4842, 5292, and 5512 L=0 levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
J$excitation function resonates at |n1j{-15/2} IAR in (p,p'). configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} with J|p=7+ from |s(|q) in (p,p') IAR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 0+ and 3-. RUL for the transition to g.s. rules out 2-. (p,p') via IAR rules out J|p=2+ (2007He01) 
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$D+Q |g to 3-. |g to 5- is not M2 or E3 (RUL)E3. Resonates at the |n2g{-9/2} IAR in (p,p'). configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-7/2}{+-1} from |s(|q) in (p,p') IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6 : 9+
level_comment:
J$excitation function resonates at |n1j{-15/2} IAR in (p,p'). configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} from |s(|q) in (p,p') IAR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). Confirming assignments are L(|a,|a')=4 and L(p,p')=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$unweighted average of 4.8 fs {I9} from (n,n'|g) and 2.6 fs {I+5-3} from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} or |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2+4, or L=2 with both d3/2 and d5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$excited in (|a,|a') so this level must Be different from the 5835.8 level which has unnatural parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-7/2}{+-1} 
J$excitation function resonates at |n2g{-9/2} IAR in (p,p'). J|p=8- from |s(|q) in (p,p') IAR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$from (|g,|g'). |G data in (|g,|g') gives T{-1/2}=0.283|G{-|g0}/|G fs +27-23. B(M1)=1.01 {I+43-13} in (e,e') gives T{-1/2}=0.59|G{-|g0}/|G fs +9-17. T{-1/2}<2.1 fs is reported in (n,n'|g). The uncertainties in the (e,e') work do not include a systematic component 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2+4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for d3/2 gives 1- or 2-. Strength in (d,p) rules out 1- given J|p=1- for the 5947 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$from (|g,|g'). Other: <1.4 fs from (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} + |p2f{-7/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=4 for 2g7/2 gives 3- or 4-. Mult(1762|g) to 6- cannot Be M3 (RUL) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2 for d3/2. |g's to 0+ and 3-. Excited in (|a,|a') so 2- is ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2h{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1}? 
J$probable configuration for L(d,p)=(5) allows 5+ or 6+. |g to 4- is not M2 (RUL) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g'). A confirming argument is from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
T$from B(E2)=0.0505 {I37} in (e,e'). Other: 0.75 fs {I+20-13} from (|g,|g'), both deduced for |G{-|g0}/|G=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g'). Confirming arguments are L(|a,|a')=1 and L(d,p)=0+2 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=2+4. A confirming argument is L(p,p')=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g'). A confirming argument is L(|a,|a')=1 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+,6+)
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2h{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1}? 
E$the energy agreement between (d,p) and (p,p') is poor, but 1997VaZT assign these as the same level 
J$probable configuration for L(d,p)=(5) allows 5+ or 6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
E,J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). The evaluator assumes that this level is distinct from that at 6427.6 since (|a,|a') is not expected to excite an unnatural parity level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in (|g,|g'). A confirming argument is L(d,p)=0+2 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
E$this level may correspond to one of the adjacent levels seen in (p,p') or (d,p) 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
$B(M2)|?3 from (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |p1h{-9/2}|p2d{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2h{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1}? 
J$probable configuration for L(d,p)=(5). |g to 3- rules out 6- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2- and 5-. Excited in (|a,|a') so level probably has natural parity. From |s and form factor in (e,e') one has J|p=1-,(2-,3-) for a level at 6701 {I9} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E,J$J|p=1- from |g(|q) and |g(pol) for E|g=6719.7 {I5}. L=(1) in (p,p') for E=6719.7 {I7}. E(d,p)=6720.8 {I15}. Although the energy agreement is not good, E(p,p'|g)=6718.5 {I3} with J determined as 1 from |g(|q), and E|g=6716.3 {I4} in (d,p|g) and E(|a,|a')=6717 {I2} probably correspond to the same 1- level 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
E$from (d,p|g). Others:6929.1 {I6} from (p,p')and 6927.5 {I6} from (d,p) 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'|g). A confirming argument is L(d,p)=2 with both d{-3/2} and d{-5/2} configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-5/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
E$from (d,p|g). Others:6969.5 {I6} from (p,p') and 1968.9 {I6} from (d,p) 
J$L(d,p)=2 with both d{-3/2} and d{-5/2} configurations. Note that L(p,p')=(1) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12-
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1i{-13/2}|p1h{-11/2}{+-1} 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). A confirming argument is from 1990Fu07 in (p,p') based on comparison of |s(|q) with DWBA calculations for the indicated pure particle-hole configuration, and agreement of excitation energy with the calculated value. The J|p and configuration agree with the earlier (p,p') work of 1980Ba46 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+,2-)
level_comment:
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). J|p=3+ is the authors' preferred value, but 2- cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
E$the data are inconsistent. The values are 7238.7 {I6} (d,p|g), 7239.6 {I15} (d,p), 7241.4 {I1} (p,p'|g), 7237.9 {I15} (p,p') and 7243 {I3} (|g,|g'). The evaluator assumes that all these reactions are exciting the same level. 
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=0+2 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$this level is excited in (|a,|a') and thus is probably distinct from the 7278.68 level which has unnatural parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-,3+)
level_comment:
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). 3+ is the authors' preferred value; however, 2- cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-,6-)
level_comment:
E$L is tentative, so this may Be the same as the 7334.8 level 
$configuration=|n2h{-11/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1}? 
J$probable configuration for L(d,p)=(5) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$J|p=3- or 1- from |s and form factor in (e,e'). 3- is the authors' preferred value, but 1- cannot Be ruled out. |g to 4- rules out the 1- alternative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$J=1 from |g(|q) in (|g,|g'). J|p=1- or possibly 3- from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$possibly the same level as that seen at 7469.18 in resonance work 
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$L(d,p)=0+2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,3-)
level_comment:
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). The authors' preferred assignment is 3-, but 1- cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} + |n3d{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
E$possibly the same level as that seen at 7548.49 in resonance work 
J$L(d,p)=0+2. Confirming arguments are J=1 from |g(|q) in (|g,|g'), and J|p=1- or possibly 2- or 3+ from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$J=1 from |g(|q) in (|g,|g'). J|p=1- or possibly 2- or 3- from |s and form factor in (e,e') 
T$from (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+,3-)
level_comment:
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). The authors' preferred assignment is 3-; however, 1- and 2+ cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2h{-9/2}{+-1} 
J$from a comparison of |s(|q)with DWBA calculations for the indicated pure particle-hole configuration, and agreement of the excitation energy with the calculated value (1990Fu07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2)
level_comment:
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). The authors preferred assignment is 2+; however, 1- and 2- cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,3-)
level_comment:
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). The authors preferred assignment is 3-; however, 1- cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$L=4 in (|a,|a'), (d,d') and (p,p') 
$|G=400 keV {I50} in (p,p'). %EWSR=3.0 {I15} in (p,p'), 2.5 in (|a,|a') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n2h{-9/2}{+-1} 
J$from a comparison of |s(|q)with DWBA calculations for the indicated pure particle-hole configuration, and agreement of the excitation energy with the calculated value (1990Fu07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) in (|g,|g') dipole excitation is dominant, but an L=2 contribution as large as 25% cannot Be excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (d,d') and (p,p'); however, |g(|q) in (|g,|g') shows a dominant dipole contribution, but an L=2 contribution as large as 20% cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$configuration:isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance 
J$L=2 in (|a,|a'), (d,d'), and (p,p') 
E$from (|a,|a'). Others:10500 {I200} (d,d'), 10600 {I200} (p,p'), 
$|G=3.0 {I3} MeV, %EWSR=100 {I13} (2004Yo02). See (|a,|a') for other values and a discussion of possible higher L components. |G=2.0 MeV {I2} in (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) gives a dominant dipole contribution, but an L=2 contribution as large as 25% cannot Be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1,2)
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) gives a dominant dipole contribution, but an L=2 contribution as large as 15% cannot Be ruled out 
$|G<70 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$L=4 in (|a,|a') and (p,p') 
$|G=2.4 MeV {I2} in (p,p'), 3.6 MeV in (|a,|a'). %EWSR=10 {I3} in (p,p') and 14 in (|a,|a') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 13300 {I300} (2004Yo02 in (|a,|a')), 13500 {I100} in (|g,|g'), and 13600 {I200} (e,e'). Others: 13000 {I100} (2004Uc01 in (|a,|a')), 13600 (p,p'), and 13420 (|g,n) 
$configuration: low-energy component of the isoscalar giant dipole resonance (see (|a,|a')) 
J$from |s and form factor in (e,e'). Confirming arguments are L=1 in (|a,|a') and (p,p'), and J=1 from |g(|q) in (|g,|g') 
$|G=7.7 {I5} MeV (2004Yo02 in (|a,|a')), 4.05 MeV (1970Ve03 in (|g,n)) and 3.7 MeV in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$from 2004Yo02 in (|a,|a'). See (|a,|a') for other values ranging from 13000 to 13900. E=13500 {I300} in (d,d'), 13900 in (p,p'), and 14000 in (e,e') 
$configuration: isoscalar giant monople resonance. L=0 is dominant; however, other components are required. See (|a,|a') for a discussion. From observation of a g.s. |g branch in (|a,|a'|g), 1989Po01 determine that not more than 12% {I4} of the observed singles resonance |s can Be due to isovector dipole excitation. Strong feeding of the 13/2+ level in {+207}Pb from their (|a,|a'n) work, 1984Ey01 conclude that there must Be an L=6 component. This is corroborated by the ({+17}O,{+17}O'n) work of 1989Br03 
J$L=0 in (|a,|a'), (d,d'), and (p,p'). See comment on configuration 
$|G=2.88 MeV {I20} (2004Yo02 in (|a,|a')). See (|a,|a') for other values 
$%EWSR=99 {I15} (2004Yo02 in (|a,|a')). See (|a,|a') for other values 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$from 2004Yo02 in (|a,|a'). E=20500 {I1000} in ({+3}He,{+3}He'). See (|a,|a') for other values 
$configuration: high-energy giant octupole resonance (2004Yo02, 1997Da11) 
$|G=7.4 MeV {I6} (2004Yo02 in (|a,|a')). Others: 78 {I15} in ({+3}He,{+3}He'). See also (|a,|a') for more values 
$%EWSR=70 {I14} (2004Yo02 in (|a,|a')). See (|a,|a') for other values 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=1 
$configuration: high-energy component of the isoscalar giant dipole resonance (2004Yo02 and other references in (|a,|a')). E|?21500 reported by 1983SeZX in inelastic pion scattering (see (x,x')). They report that the forward angle strength is consistent with an isoscalar dipole resonance, but not with a quadrupole or octupole resonance 
E$from 2004Hu04 in (|a,|a'). See (|a,|a') for other values 
$|G=3.8 MeV {I8} (2004Hu04 in (|a,|a')). See (|a,|a') for other values 
$EWSR=158 {I43} (2004Hu04 in (|a,|a')). See (|a,|a') for other values 
$From |a-proton and |a-neutron coincidence work, 2004Hu04 determine branching for direct proton decay to the 2s1/2 + 2d3/2 states and 1h11/2 + 2d5/2 final states in {+207}Tl of 2.3% {I11} and 1.2% {I7}, respectively. The value for direct neutron decay to final states in {+207}Pb with excitation energies from O to 6 MeV is 23% {I5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=190 keV {I40}, (2J+1)|G{-n0}/|G=0.6 {I2} 
$Data are from 1980Be52 in (n,X) who suggest that the resonance is the IAR of a possible 1- level in {+208}Tl predicted at |?1500 by 1970Do03. See also (|g,p),(e,e'p) where E=24400 and the same interpretation is given 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=190 keV {I40}, (2J+1)|G{-n0}/|G=0.6 {I2} 
$Data are from 1980Be52 in (n,X) who suggest that the resonance is the IAR of a possible 1- level in {+208}Tl predicted at |?2000 by 1970Do03. See also (|g,p),(e,e'p) where E=25000 and the same interpretation is given 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=2 
$|G=6.0 {I13} MeV (2004Hu04, 2003Hu13 in (|a,|a')) 
$configuration: suggested as an overtone of the isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance (2004Hu04, 2003Hu13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$Interpreted by 1975Sh12, 1975Sh13 as the IAR of a possible 2+ level in {+208}Tl predicted at |?2800 by 1970Do03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from adopted levels, based on B(E3) in Coulomb excitation and (e,e'). 1962We14 report 32 ps {I11} from |g|g(t) 
$g-factor: weighted average of 1969Bo12 (|w|t/H=5.9|*10{+-8} {I15}) and 1973ScYX (|w|t/H=6.3|*10{+-8} {I9}) with T{-1/2}=16.7 ps {I3} (see adopted levels) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of |bce(t) data of 1971Va24 (286 ps {I26}) and |g|g(t) data of 1962We14 (298 ps {I18}). Others: 1954El07, 1954El24 
G$from 1969Bo01 based on |w|t/|w|t(2614 level)=0.74 {I12}, g-factor(2614 level)=0.54 {I7}, with T{-1/2}(2614 level)=16.7 ps {I3} and T{-1/2}(3197 level)=294 ps {I15}. Other: 1965Jo12 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$probably corresponds to the adopted level at 4712 with J|p=4- which decays via a dominant 2097 transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J E0 to 0+ 
$Tentatively identified by the authors as the two-neutron pairing vibration reported by 1966Bj03 at 4870 in (t,p). This may correspond to the 0+ state at 4868 {I2} established in (d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$1973Vo11 report L=4 with S=0.4 for E=4220. This is probably the same level as the 4230 reported by 2001Va04; however, 2001Va04 report L=2, and the adopted J|p is 2- 
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$1973Vo11 report L=4 or 2 with corresponding S=0.1 and 0.03. The adopted J|p is 5- 
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$1973Vo11 report L=0 with S=0.065. The adopted J|p is 3-. The evaluator notes that |s(|q) of 1973Vo11 would seem to be reproducible by L=2+4, whereas the polarization data of 1997VaZT rule out L=0 
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2} + |n2g{-7/2} 
E$1997VaZT report 5346.4 {I4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$1973Vo11 report L=4, and in 2001Va04 only the L=2 component is shown. In adopted levels there is a close-lying level at 5566.0 with unknown J|p. This level could be contributing to the |s(|q) and analyzing power results of these authors. 
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2} + |n2g{-7/2} 
E$1997VaZT report 5564.7 {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$1973Vo11 report L=4. 1997VaZT report two fits, L=2 with S=0.220+0.033 for d3/2 + d5/2, and L=2+4 with S=0.015+0.40 for 3d5/2 + 2g7/2. 2001Va04 report only the L=2 result from 1997VaZT. L=2 gives a better fit to the analyzing power data, but L=2 and L=2+4 give equally good fits to |s(|q). In adopted levels there is a close-lying level at 5782.0 with unknown J|p that could be influencing the extraction of L and s 
$configuration=|n3d{-5/2} + |n2g{-7/2} or |n3d{-3/2} + |n3d{-5/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n4s{-1/2} + |n3d{-5/2} or |n3d{-3/2} 
L$L=2/L=0>0.7 (2007He01). 1997VaZT report L=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$considered tentative by the authors and proposed on the basis of the single 760|g seen in (n,n'|g) work of 1990Go33. The level is now well established 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$suggested by the authors as questionable since it is based on only a single weak transition in (d,p|g). It is not seen in any other reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$suggested as questionable by the authors since the deexciting 2520|g is seen in (d,p|g) only as a shoulder on the much stronger 2513 peak. This level is not seen in any other reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$in (n,n'|g), a 2626.5 {I4} transition is seen from the 5241, 0+ level to the 3- level. This energy is sufficiently different from the 2625.2 {I5} transition seen here that this transition defines a different level. The transition to the 3- from the 0+ level is not seen here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.52 {I4} 
E$others:4085.5 {I15} (2001RyZZ), 4085.2 {I20} (1980Ch22) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1974Sw05) 
T$for |G{-|g0}/|G=0.9954 {I15} from adopted gammas 
S$weighted average of 0.45 {I3} (2003En07), 0.68 {I9} (2001RyZZ), 0.49 {I5} (1974Sw05) and 0.58 {I3} from B(E2) in (e,e') others: 0.68 {I15} (1980Ch22), 0.51 {I20} (1977Co10) 
$|G{-|g0}/|G>0.9 (1974Sw05). The value is at the 99% confidence level based on self-absorption measurements and a search for competing |g branches 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.79 {I11} 
E$E|g=4507.1|g reported by 2001RyZZ and assigned to a 4507 level. This level is not seen in any other reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.16 {I5} 
E$E|g=4729.3|g reported by 2001RyZZ and assigned to a 4729 level. This level is not seen in any other reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=4.86 {I24} 
E$weighted average of 4841.7 {I3} (2003En07) and 4842.2 {I2} (1981Bi11). Other:4841.4 {I12} (2001RyZZ) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1994Oh06, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 4.78 {I31} (2003En07), 5.01 {I54} (2001RyZZ), 4.7 {I9} (1982Wi06), 5.0 {I8} (1980Ch22), and 5.1 {I8} (1974Sw05). Other:6.9 {I14} (1979La01) 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.85 {I+13-9} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=5.67 {I21} 
E$others: 5291.9 {I13} (2001RyZZ), 5292.6 {I20} (1980Ch22) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 6.31 {I43} (2003En07), 5.58 {I59} (2001RyZZ), and 5.1 {I8} (1980Ch22) others: 5.2 {I15} (1981Ac02), 7.0 {I14} (1979La01), 7 {I2} (1978Kn06), 8.6 {I30} (1977Co10) 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.78 {I+22-14} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=22.6 {I10} 
E$others: 5511.7 {I15} (2001RyZZ), 5512.2 {I10} (1980Ch22). The value of 1978Kn06, 5507.7 {I18}, is discrepant 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1994Oh06, 1982Wi06, 1979Na01) 
S$weighted average of 28.3 {I21} (2003En07), 22.2 {I23} (2001RyZZ), 17.7 {I48} (1981Ac02), 22.3 {I34} (1980Ch22), 21.4 {I22} (1979La01). Others: 17.7 {I48} (1981Ac02), 18 {I3} (1978Kn06) 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.98 {I+2-4} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.14 {I2} 
E$other: 5714.3 {I18} (2001RyZZ) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07) 
T$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.888 {I9} from adopted gammas 
S$from 2003En07. Other: 0.14 {I3} (2001RyZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.61 {I13} 
E$others: 5844.5 {I15} (2001RyZZ), 5846.1 {I11} (1984Be31) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 1.67 {I16} (2003En07), 1.50 {I22} (2001RyZZ), and 1.2 {I4} (1982Wi06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.06 {I11} 
E$others: 5946.6 {I13} (2001RyZZ), 5948.0 {I30} (1980Ch22) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07) 
S$weighted average of 1.13 {I11} (2003En07), 0.86 {I20} (2001RyZZ), and 1.0 {I3} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.61 {I13} 
E$other: 6193.0 {I16} (2001RyZZ) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07) 
S$weighted average of 0.57 {I7} (2003En07) and 0.99 {I21} (2001RyZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.78 {I28} 
E$other: 6255.1 {I21} (2001RyZZ) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07) 
S$unweighted average of 0.50 {I7} (2003En07) and 1.06 {I15} (2001RyZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=2.7 {I5} 
E$others: 6263.1 {I16} (2001RyZZ), 6263.4 {I30} (1980Ch22) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 4.17 {I54} (2003En07), 2.39 {I28} (2001RyZZ), 3.0 {I11} (1981Ac02), 2.6 {I5} (1980Ch22), 4.1 {I18} (1977Co10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=3.0 {I3} 
E$others: 6312.9 {I12} (2001RyZZ), 6311.7 {I30} (1980Ch22) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 3.34 {I52} (2003En07), 2.67 {I37} (2001RyZZ), 3.2 {I6} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.67 {I17} 
E$others: 6361.1 {I26} (2001RyZZ), 6362.8 {I30} (1980Ch22) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 2.05 {I37} (2003En07), 1.56 {I22} (2001RyZZ), 1.6 {I4} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.29 {I8} 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07) 
T$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.71 {I6} from adopted gammas 
S$from 2003En07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=8.7 {I8} 
E$others: 6718.5 {I19} (2001RyZZ), 6720.1 {I15} (1980Ch22) 6721.1 {I18} (1978Kn06) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (2003En07, 1982Wi06) 
S$weighted average of 9.9 {I11} (2001RyZZ), 6.9 {I20} (1981Ac02), 7.6 {I15} (1980Ch22). Others: 13.0 {I15} (1979La01), 13 {I3} (1978Kn06), 13.0 {I16} (1979La01), 13 {I3} (1978Kn06), 15 {I6} (1977Co10). As pointed out by 1980Ch22, these high values may include a contribution from a close-lying level in {+206}Pb 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=1.00 {I+0-11} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.66 {I12} 
J$J=2 from |g(|q) (2001RyZZ). J|p=2- is ruled out since the measured value of |G{-|g0}/|G would lead to B(M2)(W.u.)>82 for the 6913 g.s. transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.26 {IAP} 
E$from 1965Gi04 
S$|G{-|g0}=0.95 eV {I10}, |G|?3.5 eV, |e=10 eV {I1} (1965Gi04). See also 1967Pr15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=17.8 {I11} 
E$from 1981Bi11. Others: 7062.1 {I26} (2001RyZZ), 7063.3 {I15} (1980Ch22). 1976Sp05 report 7064.4 {I5}; however, this value should be lowered by about 1 keV. See comment on the 7083 level 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (1982Wi06, 1981Bi11, 1979Na01) 
S$weighted average of 17.3 {I19} (2001RyZZ), 19.5 {I17} and 17.4 {I33} (1981Bi11), 16.9 {I44} (1981Ac02), 15.7 {I26} (1980Ch22). Others: 24 {I3} (1978Kn06), 29 {I3} (1977Ye01), 29 {I10} (1977Co10), 18 {I3} (1976Sp05), 31 {I3} (1973Sw01). As pointed out by 1980Ch22, these high values may contain a contribution from a close-lying level in {+206}Pb 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.98 {I+2-7} (1980Ch22). Others: 0.9 {I+1-4} (1977Ye01). |G{-|g}/|G<0.1 for branching of gammas to any one level with J=1,2 or 3 (1973Sw01, 99% confidence level). |G{-|g0}/|G>0.7 based on nonobservation of branching gammas (1977Ye01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=9.1 {I7} 
E$from 1981Bi11. Others: 7081.9 {I25} (2001RyZZ), 7082.8 {I15} (1980Ch22). 1976Sp05 report 7084.4 {I5} based on calibration lines of 7632.2 {I2} and 7646.6 {I2} from {+56}Fe(n,|g). Recent values for these transitions are E|g=7631.2 {I2}, 7645.6 {I2} (1980Ve05) and 7631.3 {I2}, 7645.7 {I2} (1980Is02) so the authors' value should be lowered by about 1 keV, giving agreement with the adopted value 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (1982Wi06,1981Bi11,1979Na01) 
S$weighted average of 9.4 {I10} (2001RyZZ), 9.1 {I13} (1981Bi11), 8.0 {I23} (1981Ac02), 8.8 {I15} (1980Ch22). Others: 15 {I3} (1978Kn06), 16 {I3} (1977Ye01), 14 {I5} (1977Co10), |?9.8 (1974Sc08), 17 {I2} (1973Sw01). As pointed out by 1980Ch22, these high values may include a contribution from a close-lying level in {+206}Pb 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=1.0 (1980Ch22). The authors measured value is larger than unity by almost two standard deviations. They consider this to be a statistical anomaly and set the g.s. branching to unity others: 0.8 {I+2-3} (1977Ye01), 0.58 {I+26-20} (1974Sc08). |G{-|g}/|G<0.1 for branching of gammas to any one level with J=1,2 or 3 (1973Sw01, 99% confidence level). |G{-|g0}/|G>0.7 based on nonobservation of branching gammas (1977Ye01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=2.2 {I3} 
E$other: 7243 {I4} (1980Ch22) 
S$weighted average of 2.3 {I3} (2001RyZZ), 1.7 {I6} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.7 {I6} 
E,S$from 1980Ch22. Based on their value of |G{+2}{-|g0}/|G, the authors suggest that this level is distinct from that at 7279 or at least that one or more levels in addition to the 7279 level are contributing to the observed strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.78 {I2} 
E$from E(recoil-corrected source E|g)-E(level)=7.3 eV {I1} (see table above) and E|g({+56}Fe(n,|g) source)=7278.82 {I20} (1980Ve05) one gets E(level)=7278.67 {I20} 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (1970Mo26) 
$For sources for parameters of this level see table above 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=29 {I3} 
E$weighted average of 7331.3 {I30} (2001RyZZ), 7332.2 {I15} (1980Ch22), 7332.7 {I13} (1978Kn06) 
J$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements (1982Wi06, 1979Na01) 
S$weighted average of 29.3 {I31} (2001RyZZ), 26.9 {I48} (1980Ch22). Others: 27 {I7} (1981Ac02), 45 {I3} (1979La01), 42 {I1} (1978Kn06), 38 {I13} (1977Co10) 
$|G{-|g0}/|G=1.00 {I+0-12} (1980Ch22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=3.1 {I4} 
E,J$with S(n)=7367.87 {I5} this level corresponds to E(res c.m.)=47 {I3}, known to have J|p=1- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.6 {I3} 
E,J$with S(n)=7367.87 {I5} this level corresponds to E(res c.m.)=179.6 {I26}, known to have J|p=1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.3 {I5} 
E,J$with S(n)=7367.87 {I5} this level corresponds to E(res c.m.)=263 {I4}, known to have J|p=1- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: AS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
E,J$from 1976Sm03. With S(n)=7367.87 {I5} this corresponds to E(res c.m.) =317.4 {I5}, known to have J|p=1- 
S$|G{-|g0}=14 eV {I+6-4}, |G=1.1 keV {I+5-3} (1976Sm03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.93 {I19} 
E,J$with S(n)=7367.87 {I5} this level corresponds to E(res c.m.)=354.7 {I24}. No resonance with J=1 is known at this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=1.20 {I25} 
E,J$with S(n)=7367.87 {I5} this level corresponds to E(res c.m.)=545 {I3}, known to have J|p=1- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1982St03 
$Dipole excitation dominant, but E2 contribution as high as 25% cannot be ruled out (|s(|q) 1982St03). 1985Be18, from |s(|q) for E|g=10055, also conclude that dipole excitation is dominant. From their |s(scattering) and |s(absorption) from 1977Sh19 in (|g,n), 1985Be18 obtain |G|<25 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1982St03 
$Dipole excitation dominant, but E2 contribution as high as 20% cannot be excluded (|s(|q) 1982St03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1982St03 
$Dipole excitation dominant, but E2 contribution as high as 15% cannot be ruled out (|s(|q) 1982St03). 1985Be18, from |s(|q) for E|g=11388, also conclude that dipole excitation is dominant. From their |s(scattering) and |s(absorption) from 1977Sh19 in (|g,n), 1985Be18 obtain |G|<70 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from data of 1982St03 as given by 1985Be18 
$Dipole excitation dominant, but E2 contribution as high as 15% cannot be ruled out (|s(|q) 1982St03). 1985Be18, from |s(|q) for E|g=11388, also conclude that dipole excitation is dominant. From their |s(scattering) and |s(absorption) from 1977Sh19 in (|g,n), 1985Be18 obtain |G|<70 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1992Da09. Others: 1988Sc16 report E=22.5|*10{+3} 
CONF$isovector giant electric dipole resonance (1992Da09, 1988Sc16). Excitation is E2 from polarization asymmetries (1992Da09) 
$|G=5.5 MeV {I5}, %EWSR=140 {I30} (1992Da09). Others: 1988Sc16 report |G=9.0 MeV and %EWSR=100 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from B(E3) 
L$1968Zi02 report L=3 
BE3$from model-independent analysis by 1980Go12 of |s data of 1968Zi02, 1970He18, 1971Na24, 1972Fr07, and authors' own data. From a similar analysis of these data (except 1980Go12) 1974Ro26 obtained B(E3)=0.69 {I5}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from B(E2) and g.s. branching=0.9954 {I15} 
L$1968Zi02 report L=2 
BE2$from 1982He03 based on their data and those of 1968Zi02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from B(E4) and g.s. branching=0.00260 {I+27-35} 
L$1968Zi02 report L=4 
BE4$from 1982He03. Others: 1971Na24 (0.13), 1968Zi02 (0.23 {I2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
J$the tentative assignment of 1979LiZQ is confirmed by 1992Co14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$1976Fr18 report L=4 + L>4 for E=5230. 1968Zi02 report L=3,4 
T$from B(E3) and g.s. branching=0.0089 {I+1-3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_comment:
J$complex peak. 10+ component not fully resolved. Other components in addition to 7-,10+ are present. See also 5541 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J$complex peak. 7- component not fully resolved. Other components in addition to 7-,10+ are present. See also 5540 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
BM1$for isoscalar excitation. Isovector nature is ruled out (1985Mu01). The uncertainty in B(M1) does not include any systematic component 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$longitudinal form factor well fitted by curve reproducing the momentum-transfer dependence of excitation of the 2+ level at 4086 (1982Hi10) 
T$from B(E2) if g.s.-branching=100% 
BE2$from 1982Hi10 based on analysis of unpublished data of 1978FrZL and 1979LiZQ and data of 1982He03. 1968Zi02 report B(E2)=0.07 {I2}. 1973FaZT report |G{-|g0}|?11 eV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,(1-)
level_comment:
E$1982Hi10 tentatively identify a peak at 7480 with the concentration of M1 strength observed in (n,|g) (E=resonance) between |?7400 and |?7550 levels. B(M1)=14-26, much larger than the average value of 5.2 from (n,|g) and (|g,n). The authors emphasize that the (e,e') value is very sensitive to nuclear structure effects since it is, of necessity, extracted from the form factor in a region beyond the first diffraction maximum 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1977Pi08. Others: 8900 (1997Ka17, 1975Sc33, 1973Na05) 
$|G=2.0 MeV {I2} (1977Pi08). Other: 1.3 MeV {I2} (1975Sc33) 
$%EWSR=35 (for E2) (1975Sc33) 1973Na05, 1974Pi07, 1977Pi08, 1997Ka17 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1988Bo22. Others: 1972Bu38, 1973Na05, 1974Pi07, 1977Pi08. This peak is split by 1977Pi08 into three components with E=10.07 MeV {I3}, 10.60 MeV {I4}, and 11.37 MeV {I5} with widths(keV)= 0.20 MeV {I5}, 0.36 MeV {I6}, and 0.37 MeV {I5}, respectively. See also 1973Na05. 1997Ka17 report peaks at |?10.1 and 10.7 MeV 
WIDTH$2.0 MeV {I3} (1988Bo22), 2.7 MeV {I3} (1975Sc33) 
$%EWSR(9-12.5 MeV)=67 (if E2) (1988Bo22). %EWSR(8.0-11.5 MeV)=50 {I+15-7} (1987Ki06, from a reanalysis of data of 1981Ku14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$from 1977Pi08. Others: 14.1 (1975Sc33), 13400 (1973Na05) 
J$from 1984CaZT 
$1984CaZT report that the strength function agrees to within a few percent with that from (|g,n) data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1972Bu38. Others: 14.2 (1988Bo22), 14.1 (1975Sc33, 1975Na05) 
$%EWSR(12.5-16 MeV)=44% if E0 (1988Bo22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$J|p=0+ established by 1996Ye01 on the basis of |s(E) and the isotropy of the 2626.6|g. The authors propose that this state is the lowest-spin member of the expected quartet of two-phonon octupole states at an energy about twice that of the 3- 2614 state. This is the same state as that seen in (d,p|g) and (p,p'|g) at 5241 {I2}. In those reactions, only the E0 branch to the g.s. is seen. This g.s. branch is not seen here since only gammas were studied 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$proposed by the evaluator on the basis of data from (d,p|g) and (x,x'|g). In both reactions, the level is defined by a deexciting 1779|g. The 1778.94|g, seen but unplaced by 2005YaZW, may be the corresponding transition in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=3 confirmed by 1980Ad01, 1977Sc17, 1973Le04 
S$others: 0.100 (1980Ad01), 0.103 (1977Sc17), 0.108 (1973Le04), 0.108 (1966Sa10) 
$Excitation function resonates at several IAR 
$%EWSR=20.4 (1985Fu09). B(E3)|^=0.67 {I6} (1986Be14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
L$L=5 confirmed by 1980Ad01, 1977Sc17, 1973Le04 
S$others: 0.043 (1980Ad01) 0.044 (1977Sc17), 0.055 (1973Le04), 0.074 (1966Sa10) 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=22.9 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
E$in 1997VaZT this energy is given as being from (d,p). The (p,p') value is given there as 3474.1 {I3} 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=24.0 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
L$L=5 confirmed by 1980Ad01, 1977Sc17, 1973Le04 
S$others: 0.045 (1980Ad01), 0.032 (1977Sc17), 0.035 (1973Le04), 0.035 (1966Sa10) 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=8.0 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=6.5 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
L$from 1977Sc17. 1975Wa18 report L=(7) and 1973Le04 report L|>6 
S$other: 0.025 (1977Sc17) 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR (1968Wh02) with |G(p')=8.0 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=2 confirmed by 1985Fu09, 1980Ad01, 1977Sc17, 1973Le04 
S$others: 0.055 (1980Ad01), 0.055 (1977Sc17), 0.058 (1973Le04), 0.050 (1966Sa10) 
Excitation function resonates at several IAR (1967Mo25) 
$%EWSR=13.4 (1985Fu09) 
$B(E2)|^=0.33 {I1} (1986Be14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=7.8 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR? (1967Mo25) with |G(p')=1.6 keV 
J |s(|q) calculated with RPA and phenomenological wave function is consistent with J|p=2-, not with 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=9.4 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E 1980Ad01 report E=4315 {I10} 
L$L=4 confirmed by 1980Ad01, 1977Sc17, 1973Le04 
S$others: 0.064 (1980Ad01), 0.064 (1977Sc17), 0.069 (1973Le04), 0.063 (1966Sa10) 
$B(E4)|^=0.12 {I1} (1986Be14) 
Excitation function resonates at several IAR (1967Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=12.0 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=6 confirmed by 1980Ad01, 1977Sc17, 1973Le04 
S$others: 0.072 (1982Ga02), 0.078 (1980Ad01) 0.057 (1977Sc17), 0.064 (1973Le04), 0.059 (1966Sa10) 
|G(p')=1.7 keV at the g9/2 resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
Excitation function resonates at the 2g9/2 IAR with |G(p')=15.1 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4610.8 {I5} (1997VaZT) and 4610.9 {I4} (2007HeZW). Note that in 2001Va04 the value shown is 4609.3 {I7}; however, in 1997VaZT, this is the value from (d,p) 
L$from 1977Sc17. 1975Wa18 and 1973Le04 report L=(8). L=8 confirmed by 1980Ad01 
S$others: 0.050 (1982Ga02), 0.048 (1980Ad01) 0.040 (1977Sc17), 0.039 (1973Le04), 0.045 (1966Sa10) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21, 1968Wh02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
E$2001Va04 report 4680.7 {I5} 
L,S$1975Wa18 report L=(9) with |b{-L}=0.016. The evaluator notes that L=7 seems to give a better fit to the authors' |s(|q) data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
E$2001Va04 report 4698.4 {I5} 
L$L=3 confirmed by 1973Le04 
S$other: 0.037 (1973Le04) 
$Excitation function resonates at 2g9/2, 1i11/2, 3d5/2 IAR (1968Za01, 1968Wh02) with |G(p')=5.3 keV (2g9/2 IAR), 8.7 keV (3d5/2 IAR) 
$%EWSR=2.1 (1985Fu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
E$2001Va04 report 4761.8 {I5} 
J,L$a comparison of J and L indicates a spin-flip excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L |s(|q) similar to that for the 5291 level (1975Wa18) known to have J|p=1-. 
S |b{-L}|<0.008 if L=1 
$Main excitation is via the |n3d{-5/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4859.8 {I15} (2001Va04) and 4860.9 {I6} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4866.9 {I15} (2001Va04) and 4867.8 {I5} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$from 1980Ad01 for E=4882 {I15}. 1975Wa18 report L=(10) with b10|?0.027 for E=4895 {I2} 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Main excitation is via the |n3d{-5/2} IAR (2006He21). |G(p')=10.8 keV 
L |s(|q) of 1975Wa18 consistent with L=2, not with L=3 (evaluator) 
$%EWSR=0.28 (1985Fu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from (d,p) work of 2006He21. No accurate energy is given for their (p,p') work 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$from 1980Ad01 for E=5071 {I7}. 1975Wa18 report L=(9) with |b{-9}=0.017 for E=5072 {I3}. Neither of these works would have resolved the 5068.5 and 5074.7 levels; however, E(10+)=5069.5 in {+209}Bi(t,|a|g), and E(10+)=5069.38 in {+207}Pb(d,p|g). On the basis of energy, the 10+ assignment can be associated with the 5068.5 (p,p') level 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (assignment is tentative 2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5094.3 {I15} (2001Va04) and 5093.2 {I6} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Main excitation is via the |n3d{-5/2} IAR (2006He21). |G(p')=6.7 keV 
L,S$1985Fu09 report L=2 with S=0.008. No data are shown. 1975Wa18 do not extract an L value, and their |s(|q) data are not consistent with L=2 (evaluator) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5194.3 {I6} (2001Va04) and 5195.0 {I6} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2006He21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
$configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1} + |n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
E$2001Va04 report 5240.8 {I15} 
J$proposed by 2006He21 based on the following arguments. The energy is near that of 5162, predicted by the schematic shell model for configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|p2d{-3/2}{+-1}, and the level is selectively excited by the i{-11/2} IAR. These configurations allow J|p=4- or 5-. |s(|q) is consistent with 4-, not with 5-. The observed excitation in (d,p) indicates a weak admixture of configuration=|n2g{-9/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} or |n2g{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$given as 5245.6 {I15} in 1997VaZT 
$Main excitation is via the |n3d{-5/2} IAR (2006He21, 1967Mo25) 
L |s(|q) of 1975Wa18 consistent with L=3 (evaluator) 
$%EWSR=1.4 (1985Fu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
E$2001Va04 report 5277.1 {I15} 
J,L$a comparison of J and L indicates a spin-flip excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5326.9 {I6} (2001Va04) and 5326.6 {I6} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5340.1 {I15} (2001Va04) and 5339.6 {I5} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=3 confirmed by 1985Fu09 
$Excitation function resonates at several IAR (1967Mo25) with |G(p')=1.7 keV (3d5/2 IAR) 
$%EWSR=3.7 (1985Fu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5373.9 {I15} (2001Va04) and 5373.6 {I7} (2007HeZW) 
J$|p=+ from the observed 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5536.9 {I15} (2001Va04) and 5536.7 {I9} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5615.4 {I4} (2001Va04) and 5614.8 {I5} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 
J$from 2007HeZW 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5649.8 {I9} (2001Va04) and 5649.0 {I6} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n2g{-9/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5686.2 {I15} (2001Va04) and 5686.6 {I7} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n2g{-9/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5694.8 {I15} (2001Va04) and 5695.1 {I10} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n2g{-9/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5741.1 {I4} (2001Va04) and 5741.8 {I9} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n1j{-15/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5836.0 {I8} (2001Va04) and 5835.7 {I9} (2007HeZW) 
$Main excitation is via the |n2g{-9/2} IAR (2007HeZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$p(|q) for 5845 level is consistent with J|p=1+ (1987Ta08) 
$From DWBA analysis of 65-MeV (p,p'), 1984Fu06 conclude that this level is not pure isovector but is predominantly isoscalar. 1984Dj03, from an analysis of 201-MeV (p,p'), reach the same conclusion, as do 1987Ta08 from the similarity of the measured strengths in 45-MeV (p,p') and 45-MeV (d,d') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
1975Wa18 report L=(3), |b{-3}=0.015 and state that this peak is a possible multiplet 
Excitation function resonates at the 3d5/2, 2g7/2 IAR with |G(p')=12.7 keV (3d5/2 IAR) 
$%EWSR=0.25 (1985Fu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-11/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
E,L,S$E is from 1990Fu07. S is from 1980Ad01 for E=6076 {I23}. E(12+)=6100.8 from (x,x'|g). 2001Va04 indicate the 12+ state as being different from their close-lying 6098.9 and 6101.9 levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$|s(|q) similar to that for the 5291 level (1975Wa18), known to have J|p=1-. |s(|q) consistent with calculation for a mixed isovector+isoscalar excitation (1978Mo04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$1975Wa18 report L=7, |b{-7}=0.024 for a probable multiplet structure at E=6443 {I6} 
$%EWSR=0.29 (1985Fu09) 
$Excitation function resonates at the 3d3/2+2g7/2 IAR (1967Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
E$from 1990Fu07. E=6743.6 is reported in (x,x'|g). This level is different from the adjacent close-lying levels reported in 1997VaZT since levels with such a high spin would not be seen in that work 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$the uncertainty in the authors' quoted value of 6947 {I15} is probably a misprint. The evaluator assigns |DE=2 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1i{-13/2}|n2h{-11/2}{+-1} 
E$from 1990Fu07. This level is different from the 7057.9 level reported by 2001Va04 since a level with such a high spin would not be seen in that work 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_comment:
L$|s(|q) for E=7239 {I5} is similar to that for the 5291 level level (1975Wa18) known to have J|p=1-; however, 1978Mo04 indicate that |s(|q) is fit better by a microscopic M1 calculation, giving J|p=1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$1975Wa18 report L=5, |b{-5}=0.018 for a probable multiplet structure at 7302 {I8}. 1985Fu09 report L=2, |b{-2}=0.008 with %EWSR=0.74 for E=7301 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1976Fr21. 1985Fu09 report E=7320. The level is not reported by 1975Wa18 or 1997VaZT 
$%EWSR=1.06 (1985Fu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_comment:
$configuration=|n1j{-15/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
E,J$from 1990Fu07. The level is a multiplet so the J|p assignment is not definite. If the J|p assignment is correct, this level must be different from the 7460 or 7469.3 levels reported by 2001Va04 since a level with such a high spin would not be seen in that work 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-7/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
E,J$from 1990Fu07. The authors point out that the |s(|q) fit is good, but the lack of data at forward angles prevents a definite assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=1.0 MeV. %EWSR=12 {I3} (1986Ad02). 1982Dj01 report E=9000 with |G=1.0 MeV. 1986Mc06 report E=8900 {I600} with |G=1.2 MeV {I6} and %EWSR=8 {I5} 
$configuration=isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=1.9 MeV, %EWSR=47 {I7} (1986Ad02). 19986mc06 report E=10600 {I500} with |G=2.4 MeV {I6} and %EWSR=65 {I15}. 1982Dj01 report E=10600 with |G=2.0 MeV {I2}. 1986Be14 report E=10600 {I200} with |G=2.0 MeV {I2} and %EWSR=70 {I14} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=2.4 MeV {I2}, %EWSR=10 {I3} (1986Be14) 1986Mc06 report 12000 {I700} with |G=2.5 MeV {I10} and %EWSR=8 {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1982Dj01 
$|G=3.6 MeV (1982Dj01) 
$configuration=low-energy component of the isoscalar giant dipole resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$from 1986Mc06 
$|G=5.9 MeV, %EWSR=36 {I12} (1986Mc06). 1982Dj01 report E=17600 with |G|?5 MeV. 1980Ca14 report E=19.1 MeV {I10} with |G=5.3 MeV {I8} and %EWSR=20 {I6}. 1986Ad02 report E=19800 {I200} with |G=7.1 MeV, %EWSR=50 {I12} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=6.1 MeV, %EWSR=44 {I11}. 1982Dj01 report E=21500 {I200} with |G=5.7 MeV {I2} 
$configuration=high-energy component of the isoscalar giant dipole resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2} or |n2g{-7/2}. The |n2g{-7/2} component is confirmed by 2006He21 in (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2} 
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2} and/or |n2g{-7/2} from (p,p'|g); however, |n3p{-1/2}{+-1} for the neutron hole is determined in (d,p|g), thus, given J|p=1-, the 2g{-7/2} particle component cannot contribute 
J$1968Cr05 determine J|p=1- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$configuration=|n2g{-7/2} 
$configuration=|n3d{-3/2} and/or |n2g{-7/2} from (p,p'|g); however, configuration=|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} for the neutron hole is determined in (d,p|g), so, given J|p=4+, the 3d{-3/2} particle component cannot contribute 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$1976Fr21 determine J|p=(1+); however, p'|g(|q) does not rule out the adopted value of 1- 
$The level shows essentially equal |s at the d{-3/2} + g{-9/2} s{-1/2}, and d{-5/2} IAR (1981Di08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$|b(IS)=0.774 
S 1968Hi09 report |b{-3}=0.10. 1980Wi12 report |b{-3}=0.090-0.103, |b(IS,0+ to 3-)=30.2-39.6 in single-particle units. Other: 1982Cl01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
J$from adopted levels. Measurement of spin variables in the (pol d,pol d') work of 1999Dj01 show that this is an isoscalar state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$|b(IS)=0.350 
S 1980Wi12 report |b{-2}=0.044-0.046, |b(IS,0+ to 2+)=7.0-7.5 in single-particle units. Other: 1982Cl01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$from adopted levels. The observation that the measured strengths in (p,p') and (d,d') are very similar supports the isoscalar nature of this state. The measurement of spin variables in the (pol d,pol d') work of 1999Dj01 also supports the isoscalar nature of this state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L 1980Mo18 report that L>2 in addition to L=2 is required to fit their data. 
1980Wi12 report %EWSR=104 {I15} or 85 {I15}, depending on the potential adopted 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
1980Mo18 report |s|<1/3|s(10.5 MeV level). 1980Wi12 report %EWSR=51 {I10} or 207 {I60}, depending on the potential adopted 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from B(E3) 
L$L=3 also reported by 1992Fu01, 1981De17, 1979Ha46, 1976Ru02 
S$0.106 (1981Ba45), 0.103 (1980Mo18), 0.117 (1979Ha46), 0.113 {I9} (1978Mo10), 0.118 {I9} (1976Ru02), 0.097 {I2} (1976Gi10), 0.122 {I7} (1967Al14) 
$%EWSR=17.5 {I10} (1980Be50), 21.0 (1992Fu01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=5 also reported by 1979Ha46, 1976Ru02 
S$others: 0.048 (1980Mo18), 0.049 (1979Ha46), 0.062 {I4} (1976Ru02), 0.068 {I4} (1967Al14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=5 also reported by 1979Ha46, 1976Ru02 
S$others: 0.024 (1980Mo18), 0.032 (1979Ha46), 0.038 {I3} (1976Ru02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=2 also reported by 1992Fu01, 1979Ha46, 1976Ru02 
S$others: 0.053 (1980Mo18), 0.049 (1979Ha46), 0.051 (1976Ru02), 0.051 {I4} (1967Al14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=4 also reported by 1979Ha46 
S$others: 0.063 (1980Mo18), 0.060 (1979Ha46), 0.072 {I4} (1967Al14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$from 1981De17, 1979Ha46 
S$|s(5291 level)/|s(4841 level)=0.9 {I1} (1975De07), 1.1 (1997VaZT) 
$%EWSR=4.9 {I3} (1992Po02 from reanalysis of data of 1980Ch22 in (|g,|g')) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$L=1 also reported by 1992Po02, 1981De17 
S |s(5291 level)/|s(4841 level)=0.9 {I1} (1975De07) 
$%EWSR=0.88 {I18} (1992Po02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$reported only by 1992Po02 and interpreted as an isoscalar dipole state 
L$from 1992Po02 based on |a'|g(|q) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1992Po02 report a peak at 6720 which they interpret as an isoscalar dipole state with %EWSR=0.53 {I11} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$reported only by 1992Po02 and interpreted as an isoscalar dipole state with %EWSR=0.57 {I12} 
L$from 1992Po02 based on |a'|g(|q) in (|a,|a'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E,L$reported only by 1978Mo04. Not discussed, but shown in the authors' spectrum and labeled with J|p=4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$reported only by 1992Po02 and interpreted as an isoscalar dipole state with %EWSR=0.35 {I9} 
L$from 1992Po02 based on |a'|g(|q) in (|a,|a'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance 
E$from 2004Yo02. Others (MeV):10.9 {I3} (1987Br09), 10.9 {I2} (1984Bo39), 10.9 {I3} (1980Mo18), 10.9 {I3} (1980Be50), 10.9 {I3} (1979Mo13), 10.9 {I3} (1979Ha46) 
$|G (MeV):3.0 {I3} (2004Yo02), 3.1 {I3} (1987Br09), 2.8 {I3} (1984Bo39), 2.6 {I3} (1980Mo18), 2.4 {I4} (1980Be50), 2.6 {I3} (1979Mo13), 3.0 {I3} (1979Ha46) 
$%EWSR=100 {I13} (2004Yo02), 120-170 (1987Br09), 81 {I10} at E=340 MeV, 93 {I10} at E=480 MeV (1984Bo39), 70 (1980Mo18), 77 {I15} (1980Be50), 145 {I30} (1979Ha46). When other L components are included, %EWSR= 59 (L=2) + 5 (L=3) + 16 (L=4) + 16 (L=6) (1983Mo17,1985Mo09), 115 {I20} (L=2) + 21 {I7} (L=4) (1982Ya02), and 100 (L=2) + 20 (L=4) (best fit 1979Ha46) 
L$L=2 is dominant (1977Yo05); however, an L=4 component from a hexadecapole background has been observed (see for example 1982Ya02, 1980Mo18, 1979Ha46). 1979Ey02 report |a'|g(|q) consistent with L=2, but 1981St25 report a strong population of the 13/2+ in {+207}Pb from their (|a,|a'n) work, requiring higher multipole components, L=4 and 6. See also 1984Ey01, who suggest that the E2 EWSR strength should be lowered by about 50% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$low-energy component of the isoscalar giant dipole resonance (2004Yo02, 2004Uc01) 
E$from 2004Yo02. Other(MeV):13.0 {I1} (2004Uc01). See also earlier reports from these groups given in their references. 2004Ga09 reports E=12.7 {I2}, but appears to be the same work as 2004Uc01 
$|G(MeV): 5.7 {I5} (2004Yo02), 1.1 {I4} (2004Uc01). See also earlier reports from these groups given in their references 
$%EWSR=24 {I15} (2004Yo02), 7.0 {I4} (2004Uc01. The uncertainty is statistical only) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$isoscalar giant monopole resonance (2004Uc01, 2004Yo02). From the observation of |g decay to the g.s. in (|a,|a'|g) in the energy interval 12.3 to 15.8 MeV, 1989Po01 determine that the isovector giant dipole contribution to the resonance cross section in (|a,|a') can be estimated to be no more than 12% {I4} 
E$from 2004Yo02. See also earlier reports from this group given in their references. Others (MeV):13.4 {I2} (2004Uc01), 13.9 {I3} (1987Br09), 13.9 {I2} (1984Bo39), 13.5 {I3} (1982Ya02), 13.8 {I3} (1980Mo18), 13.5 {I2} (1980Dj02), 13.9 {I4} (1980Be50), 13.9 {I3} (1979Ha46) 
L$from 2004Yo02, 2004Uc01. 1983Mo17 report small contributions from L=2, 4, and 6. From |a'|g(|q), 1979Ey02 show that L=0 is dominant, but some contribution from higher multipoles is required (|?30-40%, mainly even L). From the strong feeding of the 13/2+ level in {+207}Pb from their (|a,|a'n) work, 1984Ey01 conclude that there must be an L=6 contribution to the resonance cross section 
$|G(MeV):2.88 {I20} (2004Yo02), 4.0 {I4} (2004Uc01), 2.4 {I3} (1987Br09), 2.0 {I3} (1984Bo39), 3.0 {I3} (1982Ya02), 2.6 {I3} (1980Mo18), 3.2 {I4} (1980Be50), 2.5 {I4} (1979Ha46) 
$%EWSR=99 {I15} (2004Yo02), 104 {I9} (2004Uc01. Uncertainty is statistical only), 85 {I20} (1987Br09). For the L|=0 components, 1983Mo17 report %EWSR=14, 9.5, and 6 for L=2, 4, and 6, respectively, 1982Ya02 report %EWSR=20 {I15}, 28 {I13}, and 27 {I8} for L=2 at E=84 MeV, 89 MeV, and 119 MeV, respectively, and 1979Ha46 report %EWSR=50 {I16} if L=2, or 17 {I4} if L=4 
$From |a'-neutron coincidence studies, 1984Ey01 obtain a value of 15-20% for the direct neutron decay of the resonance to levels in {+207}Pb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Reported only by 1983Mo17 (also given in 1985Mo09). Not confirmed by 1986Ad02 
$|G=2.9 MeV, %EWSR=15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$high-energy giant octupole resonance (2004Yo02, 1997Da11). L=3 is established in (p,p') and ({+3}He,{+3}He') 
E$from 2004Yo02. Others: 19.7 {I5} (1997Da11), 18.7 {I7} (1983Mo17), 17.5 {I8} (1980Mo16) 
$|G(MeV)=7.4 {I6} (2004Yo02), 5.0 {I9} (1983Mo17), 4.8 {I8} (1980Mo16) 
$%EWSR=70 {I14} (2004Yo02), 60 {I20} (1980Mo16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$high-energy component of the isoscalar giant dipole resonance (2004Hu04, 2004Uc01, 2004Yo02, 1997Da11, 1980Mo16) 
E$from 2004Hu04. Others (MeV): 21.5 {I10} from (|a,|a'p), and 21.2 {I7} from (|a,|a'n) (2007Hu02), 22.2 {I3} (2004Yo02), 22.7 {I2} (2004Uc01) 22.4 {I5} (1997Da11), 21.3 {I8} (1980Mo16) 
L$from 2004Hu04. L=1 also determined by several earlier authors 
$|G(MeV): 3.8 {I8} (2004Hu04), 9.4 {I4} (2004Yo02), 11.9 {I4} (2004Uc01), 3.0 {I5} (1997Da11), 5.9 {I8} (1980Mo16) 
$%EWSR=158 {I43} (2004Hu04), 88 {I15} (2004Yo02), 111 {I6} (2004Uc01). 2004Uc01 point out that the uncertainty is statistical only and that the systematic uncertainty could be large. See also 1985Mo09, 1984Bo39, 1983Mo17 
$From |a-proton and |a-neutron coincidence work, 2004Hu04 determine branching for direct proton decay to the 2s1/2 + 2d3/2 states and 1h11/2 + 2d5/2 final states in {+207}Tl of 2.3% {I11} and 1.2% {I7}, respectively. The value for direct neutron decay to final states in {+207}Pb with excitation energies from 0 to 6 MeV is 23% {I5}. See also 2007Hu02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$from 2004Hu04. Also reported in 2003Hu13 
$|G=6.0 {I13} MeV (2004Hu04, 2003Hu13) 
CONF$suggested as an overtone of the isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance (2004Hu04, 2003Hu13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from B(E3) 
BE3$from 1984Ve07. Others: 0.06 {I4} (1969Ba51), 0.60 {I7} (1971Gr31), 0.54 {I3} (1972Ha59). 0.66 {I5} (1977FrZT), 0.665 {I35} (1977Jo04), 0.52 (1988Ba39). The value quoted for 1969Ba51 is the authors' original value (0.58 {I4}) as reanalyzed by 1977FrZT to include the effect of the nuclear potential (see also 1976Fe01 and 1980Li11) 
MOME2$from 1984Ve07. Others: -0.3 {I7} (1972Ha59), -1.1 {I5} (1973BaUB,1969Ba51), (see also 1976Fe01), -0.26 {I32} (1977Jo04 as corrected from -0.42 {I32} by 1984Ve07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$rounded-off value from adopted levels 
MOME2$from 1984Ve07 if B(E2)=0.318 {I16} from (e,e') is adopted. Authors' B(E2), for Q=0, is 0.275 {I7} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.398 {I44}, %EWSR=60 {I9} (1990Be03) 
$From the Coulomb-nuclear interference, the ratio of neutron to proton matrix elements is determined as 1.7 {I4} (1990Be03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_comment:
S$the evaluator has combined the values for the 1283 and 771|g's. Both transitions deexcite the 4480.7 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$J=4 from the observed L=0 {I3s}{-1/2} strength, given that the 3710 and 3963 levels have J|p=5- (adopted values) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$J=6 from the observed L=2 {I2d}{-5/2} strength, given that the J=7 strength is exhausted by the 5541 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
CONF$J|p is the adopted value. On the basis of their spectroscopic factor and the partial branching data in the (pol |g,|g') data of 1982Wi06, 1987Gr21 (see also 1986Ma55) suggest that this 1+ state is isoscalar. This conclusion is in disagreement with that of 1987Sc19 in (e,e'), who show that isoscalar-isovector mixing is required to reproduce the form factor 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$value used for energy calibration 
L$admixture of L=4 cannot be ruled out 
S$|<0.28 for hole state 1g{-7/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
$Spectroscopic factors=0.0005 for g{-9/2} and 0.0005 for g{-7/2} 
E$dominant configuration= f{-7/2}s{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$Spectroscopic factors=0.0032 for d{-5/2} and 0.0025 for g{-7/2} 
E$dominant configuration= i{-11/2}f{-5/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_comment:
$ Excited by the g{-9/2} and d{-5/2} IAR; 40% g{-9/2}f{-7/2} from excitation by the g{-9/2} IAR; 50% h{-9/2}d{-5/2} from (t,|a|g) data; <20% d{-5/2}f{-5/2}; <20% d{-5/2}f{-7/2}; <10% d{-5/2}p{-3/2}; <0.5% g{-9/2}p{-1/2} or g{-7/2}p{-1/2} from (d,p) data. 
$ Cross sections: 4, 4, 5, 15, 20 |mb/sr for different configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$ |s(|q) approximately fits g{-9/2}f{-7/2} configuration with 70% {I10} strength, with admixtures of g{-9/2}p{-1/2}, g{-9/2}f{-5/2} and g{-9/2}p{-3/2} configurations. About 0.5% g{-9/2}p{-1/2} is indicated in (d,p). From spectra taken on d{-5/2} IAR, admixture of 20% d{-5/2}f{-5/2} is deduced, while d{-5/2}f{-7/2} and d{-5/2}h{-9/2} are also likely to be present. 
$ Cross sections: 8, 10, 13, 15, 16 |mb/sr for different configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_comment:
$ 90% {I5} g{-9/2}f{-7/2} and 10% h{-9/2}d{-5/2} configuration from |s(|q) 
$ Cross sections: <2, 2, 2, 3, 15 |mb/sr for different configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
$ 90% {I5} g{-9/2}f{-7/2} configuration from |s(|q); A{-2}=-0.317, A{-4}=-0.420, A{-6}=-0.041. This state is excited by only near E(p)=14.920 MeV, g{-9/2} IAR in {+209}Bi 
$ Cross sections: 2, 2, 5, 5, 15 |mb/sr for different configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_comment:
$ >0.95% g{-9/2}f{-7/2} configuration from |s(|q) 
$ Cross sections: 2, 5, 5, 6, 12 |mb/sr for different configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$ Excited equally at all proton energies 
$ Cross section: 3, 3, 4, 5, 6 |mb/sr for different configurations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$ suggested from purely non-resonant behavior of (p,p') reaction via IAR 
$|s: g{-9/2}=1 |mb/sr, d{-5/2}=5 |mb/sr, s{-1/2}=10 |mb/sr, g{-7/2},d{-3/2}=10 |mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$ contains almost entire s{-1/2}p{-3/2} strength 
$|s: g{-9/2}=5 |mb/sr, d{-5/2}=20 |mb/sr, s{-1/2}=105 |mb/sr, g{-7/2},d{-3/2}=40 |mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
E$ new level identified in 2010He24, it contains half of the s{-1/2}p{-3/2} strength 
$|s: g{-9/2}=1 |mb/sr, d{-5/2}=10 |mb/sr, s{-1/2}=85 |mb/sr, g{-7/2},d{-3/2}=60 |mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 75 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 45 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 150 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 60 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 35 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 20 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 40 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 205 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 60 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 45 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 10 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 10 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 185 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 50 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 20 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 10 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 110 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 20 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 15 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 10 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 105 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 20 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 15 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 20 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 30 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 60 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 240 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 60 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 10 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 15 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 30 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 20 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 20 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 10 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 5 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 50 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 10 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 10 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 10 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 25 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 100 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 50 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 50 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-,6-)
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 5 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 100 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 25 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 15 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 40 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 70 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 100 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 40 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 55 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 15 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 10 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 30 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 15 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 15 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 10 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 10 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 25 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 10 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 10 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 5 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 55 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 15 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 15 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 10 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 20 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 70 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 35 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 35 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1,2+
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 2 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 50 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 5 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 5 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2:5-
level_comment:
J$ 2- to 7- assigned in {+208}Pb Adopted Levels in ENSDF database, but 6-,7- ruled out by excitation of this level in d{-5/2} IAR 
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 2 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 40 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 10 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 5 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 2 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 25 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 5 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 5 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 5 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 75 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 20 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 25 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 15 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 35 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 270 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 60 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 55 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 5 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 95 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 45 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 110 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 5 |mb/sr for i{-11/2}, 105 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 40 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 30 |mb/sr for g{-7/2} + d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 15 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 45 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 95 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 20 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 25 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 70 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 20 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 35 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 160 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 15 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 40 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 50 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 100 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 210 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 50 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 30 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 2 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 20 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 10 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 30 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$|s for different IARs in {+209}Bi: 5 |mb/sr for g{-9/2}, 20 |mb/sr for d{-5/2}, 90 |mb/sr for s{-1/2}, 30 |mb/sr for g{-7/2}+d{-3/2} doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$revised assignment of 4- is proposed by 2011He13, based on re-analysis of (p,p') and perhaps (d,p) data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$ Parity-violating asymmetry A{-PV} (in ppm)=0.656 {I60}(stat) {I14}(syst) 
$ Neutron radius R{-n}=5.78 fm {I+16-18} (2012Ab04). R{-n}-R{-p}=0.33 fm {I+16-18}, assuming measured charge radius of 5.50 fm, implying neutron distribution is 1.8|s larger than that for protons. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$A{-0}=430.1 |mb/sr {I23}, A{-2}=-38.3 |mb/sr {I45}, A{-4}=+35 |mb/sr {I6} at E(p)=14.99 MeV 
$Configuration mixing: 94% g{-9/2}p{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
E$3475 keV is the isobaric analog state of the first 4- IAR in {+208}Bi which corresponds to Ep=14.99 MeV 
$Configuration mixing: 8% g{-9/2}p{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$A{-0}=148.8 |mb/sr {I13}, A{-2}=-112.9 |mb/sr {I26}, A{-4}=+30 |mb/sr {I4} at E(p)=14.99 MeV 
$Configuration mixing: 94% g{-9/2}p{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
$A{-0}=139.2 |mb/sr {I15}, A{-2}=-96.4 |mb/sr {I30}, A{-4}=+2 |mb/sr {I4} at E(p)=14.99 MeV 
E$Fig.3 and Table 5 in 2014He09 show this level with a J|p=5- at E(p)=14.99 MeV, however authors list this level in Table 2 with J|p=6- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$2014He09 noted that this level is excited at Ep=16.45 MeV with mean cross section of 39 |mb/sr {I1}. The doublet at 4260 state is unresolved 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$noted as doublet by 2014He09 at E(p)=16.45, however observed by the authors at Ep=16.30 MeV 
J$from 2011He13 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E$isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) (2014Pa29) 
$%EWSR=147 {I18} (stat) (2014Pa29) 
L$dominant component among L=0, 1 and 2 (2014Pa29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
E$5780.25 {I35} is considered by compiler to be a typo, as this level is associated with a 5788.23 {I80} from (d,d') and 5788.35 {I70} from (d,p) by 2016He04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$0.57 |ms {I5}, measured by 2017Br08 from fit to summed decay curve of 340, 1508, 865, 348 and 2318 gamma rays gated by 1413|g. Authors use T{-1/2}=535 ns {I35} to deduce transition probabilities. This value was deduced from average of their measured value of 0.57 |ms {I5}, and 0.50 |ms {I5} in 1989Ro04 (Phys. Lett. B221, 6) and also in {+208}Pb Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from {+208}Pb Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (June 2007 update) 
T$measured by 2017Br08 from fit to the summed decay curve of 340, 1508, 865, 348 and 2318 |g rays gated at 1413 |g-transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=CA
level_comment:
$Half-life was not measured in 2017Br08, but value 0.188 ns was calculated assuming the enhancement expected for the E3 transitions. This value was used for B(E|l)(W.u.) estimations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=CA
level_comment:
$Half-life was not measured in 2017Br08, but value 0.42 ns was calculated assuming the enhancement expected for the E3 transitions. This value used for B( E|l)W estimations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 20-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Br08 from fit to the decay curve of gated 291-,340-, 948- and 2318-keV |g-transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 28-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Br08 from fit to the decay curve of gated 725-, 991-, and 1588-keV |g-transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from {+208}Pb Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (June 2007 update). Value kept fixed in the least-squares fitting procedure 
T$measured by 2017Br08 from fit to the decay curve of gated 1413 |g-transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_comment:
$Half-life was not measured in 2018Br08, but value 0.188 ns was calculated assuming the enhancement expected for the E3 transitions. This value used for B(E|l)(W.u.) estimations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14-
level_comment:
$Half-life was not measured in 2018Br08, but value 0.42 ns was calculated assuming the enhancement expected for the E3 transitions. This value used for B(E|l)(W.u.) estimations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 20-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Br08 from fit to the decay curve of gated 291-, 340-, 948-, and 2318 keV |g-transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 28-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Br08 from fit to the decay curve of gated 725-, 991-, and 1588 keV |g-transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$isoscalar giant quadrupole resonance (ISGQR) 
$(|G{-|g0}/|G){-GDR}=0.00030 {I6} (stat) {I7} (syst) (2022Wa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$isovector giant dipole resonance (IVGDR) 
$(|G{-|g0}/|G){-GDR}=0.017 {I3} (stat) {I4} (syst) (2022Wa05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
E,T$using correction factor from TAMU. Other: E=13.8 MeV {I3}, |G=3.1 MeV using correction factor from RCNP. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,p)=4 and L+1/2 transfer from analyzing power fits 
T$weighted average of 3.232 h {I5} (2013Su13) and 3.253 h {I14} (1972Be44). Others: 2.75 h {I5} (1940Kr08), 3.3 h {I1} (1942Ma03), 3.32 h {I3} (1941Fa04), 3.31 h {I3} (1959Po64), 3.31 h {I3} (1971Pe03) 
$weighted average of all =3.240 10 with reduced chi-square=4.4, =3.277 15 excluding the newest value with reduced chi-square=1.9 
MOMM1,MOME2$from atomic beam with laser fluorescence spectroscopy in 1986An06 with |m/|m({+207}Pb)=-2.4866 {I27} and |m({+207}Pb)=+0.59258 {I1} Other: |m=-1.438 {I29} assuming |m({+207}Pb)=+0.5783 and Q=-0.16 {I10} (1983Th03). 
$configuration=|n(2g{-9/2}){++1} 
$Optical isotope shifts and hyperfine structure measured by LASER resonance fluorescence from atomic beams (1983Th03) 
$|d<r{+2}>=0.091 {I5} (1983Th03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,p)=6 and L-1/2 transfer from analyzing power fits 
T$from recoil distance method in ({+17}O,{+16}O|g) (1973Ha39) 
$configuration=|n(1i{-11/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,p)=7 and L+1/2 transfer from analyzing power fits. 
T$from p(644|g)(t) in (d,p|g) (1967El05) 
$configuration=|n(1j{-15/2}){++1} with |n(2g{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} admixtures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,p)=2 and L+1/2 transfer from analyzing power fits, 1567.087|g E2 to 9/2+ 
T$from ({+7}Li,{+6}Li|g) (1972Ha59) by DSAM 
$configuration=|n(3d{-5/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,p)=L(t,d)=0 
T$weighted average of 161 ps {I8} from (117|g)(467|g)(|DT) (1965Sa08) in {+209}Tl |b{+-} decay and 160 ps {I6} from p(465|g)(t) (1978Ju02) in (d,p|g) 
$configuration=|n(4s{-1/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=0, L(d,p)=L(p,d)=1, 117.212|g E1 to 1/2+ 
T$from |b(582|g)(t) in {+209}Tl |b{+-} decay (1980Da15) 
$configuration=|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=L(t,d)=2, L(t,p)=1 
T$From Doppler-shift Attenuation Method (1979No11) 
$configuration=|n(3d{-3/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=3, L(t,p)=2 
E$weighted average of 2868 {I5} from (t,p), 2866 {I5} from (d,p), 2873 {I5} from (p,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=7. No decay to 11/2+ 
CONF$dominant |n(2g{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} with a possible |n(1j{-15/2}){++1} admixture 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$3076 5 from weighted average of 3075 5 from (D,P), 3077 5 from (P,D) 
J$L(d,p)=L(p,d)=1. s in (p,d) 
$configuration=dominant |n(3p{-3/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$|g transitions to 3/2+,7/2+, no feedings to 1/2+ or 9/2+ levels. Note that L(n)=4,5 from (d,p), with suggested configuration=|n(2h{-11/2}){++1}, is not consistent with the |g-decay mode from (d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3499 {I5} from (p,d) and 3490 {I5} from (d,p) 
J$L(p,d)=3, L(d,p)=2,3, S from (p,d) and (d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3556 {I5} from (d,p) and 3559 {I5} from (t,p). 3550 {I14} from (|a,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,p)=7. L(t,p)=(8) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_comment:
J$317.7|g to (19/2-), strong 2419.3|g to 15/2- 
CONF$dominant |n(1j{-15/2}){++1}~#3{+-} with |n(2g{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-}~#3{+-} admixtures 
$T{-1/2}=16 ps, if B(E3,2419.3|g)=50 W.u. (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_comment:
J$proposed by 1975Du08 based on the argument that only the configuration=d{-5/2}~#3- or i{-11/2}~#5- are consistent with the observed |g decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-,13/2+)
level_comment:
E$from (d,p|g), 3985 {I5} from (d,p) 
J$suggested by 2554|g to 15/2-, 3198|g to 11/2+ and 3977|g to 9/2+, but in disagreement with L(d,p)=(2,3) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+,13/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=6 
E$weighted average of 3987 {I5} from (t,|a), 3995 {I5} from (p,d), 3989 {I8} from (t,p), 3998 {I10} from (t,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2,7/2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4074 {I8} from (t,p), 4075 {I5} from (d,p), 4075 {I10} from (t,d) 
J$L(d,p)=(2,3) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4099 {I8} from (t,p), 4096 {I5} from (d,p), 4094 {I10} from (t,d) 
J$L(d,p)=(2,3), L(t,p)=(3) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4140 {I8} from (t,p), 4137 {I5} from (d,p), 4146 {I10} from (t,d), 4145 {I5} from (p,d), 4129 {I5} from (d,p|g) 
J$L(d,p)=(2,3), 4138|g to 9/2+, in disagreement with L(d,p|g)|>5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4169 {I8} from (t,p), 4166 {I5} from (d,p), 4174 {I10} from (p,d) 
J$L(d,p)=(5), L(t,p)=(6) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4315 {I8} from (t,p), 4322 {I10} from (t,d), 4309 {I5} from (p,d) 
J$L(p,d)=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_comment:
J$486.9|g to (21/2+) 
CONF$likely |n(2g{-9/2},1j{-15/2},3p{-1/2}{+-1}). The fully aligned, J|p=25/2+ state is expected to be much higher in energy, because the |n(2g{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} admixture in the |n1j{-15/2} orbital is blocked by the Pauli principle 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4384 {I8} from (t,p), 4380 {I5} from (d,p), 4390 {I5} from (t,|a) 
J$L(t,p)=(6). Excitation in (t,|a), if the same level as seen in (t,p), makes 13/2- much more likely than 11/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4539 {I8} from (t,p), 4530 {I10} from (d,p), 4529 {I12} from (p,d), 4538 {I10} from (t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4578 {I8} from (t,p), 4575 {I10} from (d,p), 4584 {I5} from (p,d) 
J$L(p,d)=3, L(t,p)=(4) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4931 {I8} from (t,p), 4940 {I10} from (d,p), 4944 {I9} from (p,d) 
J$L(p,d)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5083 {I10} from (t,p), 5085 {I10} from (d,p), 5074 {I10} from (p,d) 
J$L(p,d)=(1) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5161 {I10} from (t,p), 5153 {I10} from (d,p), 5160 {I10} from (t,d) and (p,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (|p{+-},|g) (1974Ba44) 
$|G=2 MeV from {+209}Bi(n,p) (1984Br03). 
$analog of possible giant quadrupole resonance expected at |?26.5 MeV in {+209}Bi (1984Br03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (n,|g): E=0.8-20 MeV (1972Be46) 
$Giant dipole resonance, |G=2-4 MeV from {+209}Bi(n,p) (1984Br03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E({+14}C)=29.8 MeV {I2} (1985Ku24), I({+14}C)=15 {I3} (1989Br34), HF({+14}C)=583 (1990Hu07). Other: I({+14}C)=18 (1995Ho11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
E$from 1989Br34. 
$I({+14}C)=81 {I6} (1989Br34), HF({+14}C)=3.9 (1990Hu07). Other: I({+14}C)=82 (1995Ho11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2310 keV {I5} (1969Je01) 
S$0.0074 if configuration=|n(3p{-3/2}){+-1}, 0.0045 if |n(4p{-3/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$magnitude of |s(|q) is reproduced by a distorted wave calculation for configuration h{-11/2}, but the shape is not well reproduced (1969Ha13 as reported by 1969El02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3955 keV {I20} (1969Je01) 
L,S$fit by authors to L=3 with S=0.0161 for configuration=|n(3f{-7/2}){++1}; however, this peak is a doublet in (d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|q) is isotropic. Both the magnitude and the shape of |s(|q) are well reproduced for configuration=|p(2h{-11/2}){++1} (1969Ha13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$If configuration=|n(2g{-7/2}){++1}. |<10% of this strength is estimated by the authors as being due to the unresolved |n(3d{-3/2}) level at 2540 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|n(1j{-15/2}){++1},contribution from the unresolved 1567 keV |n(3d{-5/2}){++1} state is negligible 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|n(2g{-7/2}){++1}, contribution from the unresolved 2537 keV |n(3d{-3/2}){++1} state is negligible 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|n(1j{-15/2}){++1} as suggested by 1986Ma49 in (|a,{+3}He). Peak is probable doublet consisting of 3550-keV and 3715-keV levels reported in (|a,{+3}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|n(1k{-17/2}){++1}, as suggested by 1986Ma49 in (|a,{+3}He). Peak is probable doublet consisting of 3934-keV and 4211-keV levels reported in (|a,{+3}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|n(1j{-15/2}){++1}. Value given is corrected for a small contribution (theory value of 0.91 assumed) from unresolved |n(3d{-5/2}){++1} level at 1567 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|n(2g{-7/2}){++1}. Value given is corrected for a small contribution (theory value of 0.90 assumed) from unresolved |n(3d{-3/2}){++1} level at 2538 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$if |p{+-} capture is in 4f orbital. E=8.5 MeV {I4} if |p{+-} capture is in 5g orbital 
$1974Ba44 suggests this level is analog of possible giant quadrupole resonance expected at |?26.5 MeV in {+209}Bi 
$Radiative branching to 7900 level=0.047% {I7} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
$Authors of 1984Br03 suggest this may be the analog of possible giant isovector quadrupole resonance at |?26 MeV in {+209}Bi or possibly a 2 hbar |w-type transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
$|G=2 to 4 MeV 
$Authors of 1984Br03 suggest this may be the analog of possible giant isovector monopole resonance predicted at |?30 MeV in {+209}Bi and assign L=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$authors' parentheses around this L value in their Table vi is apparently a misprint. See authors' Fig. 6 and the text (1971Ig01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_comment:
CONF$dominant |n(1j{-15/2}){++1}~#3{+-} with |n(2g{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-}~#3{+-} admixtures 
$T{-1/2}=16 ps, if B(E3,2419.3|g)=50 W.u. (2000Re12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_comment:
CONF$likely |n(2g{-9/2},1j{-15/2},3p{-1/2}{+-1}). The fully aligned, J|p=25/2+ state is expected to be much higher in energy, because the |n(2g{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} admixture in the |n1j{-15/2} orbital is blocked by the Pauli principle 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
%A Weighted average of %|a=1.7|*10{+-6} {I3} (1962Ka27) and %|a=2.7|*10{+-6} {I6} (1964Wo05). 
T$weighted average of: 22.4 y {I4} (1957Me47), 23.3 y {I5} (1959Pa03), 21.4 y 5 (1960Ec01), 22.9 y {I7} (1963Im02), 22.0 y {I5} (1964Ra12), 22.2 y {I10} (1967Vo04), 22.26 y {I22} (1969Ho06), and 21.8 y {I3} (2002Re18). Evaluator's recommended uncertainty (0.22 y) is from 1969Ho06. 2008ChZV recommended a value of 22.23 y {I12}. Others: 1931Cu01, 1955To14, 1959Ha20. 
Isotope shift: 1987Za02, 1986An06, 1995Sh13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from B(E2)(0+ to 2+)=0.051 {I15} (1971El03) in (t,t'). 
E first 2+ states in {+206}Pb, {+212}Pb occur at 803, 805 keV, respectively. 
J 799.7|g E2 to 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from |b(298|g,799|g)(t) in {+210}Tl |b{+-} decay (1964We06). Other value: 0.9 ns {I2} |g|g(t) (1961St20). 
J L=4 in (t,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1 DPAD, corrected for Knight shift (1989Ra17,1983De34). 
T$DPAD in {+208}Pb(t,p|g) (1983De34). Other values: 21 ns {I7}, |g(t) pulsed beam (1980Sj01). 
J L=6 in (t,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1 DPAD, corrected for Knight shift (1989Ra17,1983De34). 
T$DPAD in {+208}Pb(t,p|g) (1983De34). Other values: 156 ns {I15}, |g(t) pulsed beam (1980Sj01); 152 ns {I13}, |g(t) pulsed beam in {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+16}O'|g) (1981Bo29). 
J L=8 in (t,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J L=3 in (t,p), (p,p'), (t,t'). 
B(E3)(0+ to 3-)=0.47 {I11} in (t,t') (1971El03). 
(t,t') strength of split 3- states is close to strength of 3-, {+208}Pb first excited state at 2614 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J L=3 in (p,p'), (t,t'). 
B(E3)(0+ to 3-)=0.25 {I7} in (t,t') (1971El03). 
See (p,p') for relative strengths of split 3- collective excitations at 1870, 2828 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T other: 152 ns {I13} (1981Bo29) from (799|g) (t) pulsed beam via {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+16}O'|g) E=80 MeV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 2018Br15. Weighted average of 78 ns {I15}, using a single-exponential decay fit to a |g|g(|Dt) spectrum produced by gating on the 297|g and 800|g below the isomer and the 864|g above the isomer and 102 ns {I13}, using a two-exponential decays fit to a |g|g(|Dt) spectrum produced by gating on the 297|g and 800|g below the isomer and the 528|g, 641|g, 1234|g and 1346|g above the isomer (the half-life of the J|p=8+ isomer was fixed in the fitting procedure to 201 ns {I17}, value taken from the adopted levels of the ENSDF database (adopted from 1983De34)) 
CONF$|n(g{-9/2}{++2}){-6{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels of ENSDF database (value adopted from 1983De34) 
CONF$|n(g{-9/2}{++2}){-8{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
CONF$|n(g{-9/2}{++2}){-8{++}}~#3{+-} 
T$From 2018Br15 using a single-exponential decay fit to a |g|g(|Dt) spectrum produced by gating on the 1234|g below the isomer and the 641|g and 803|g above the isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$From 2018Br15 using a single-exponential decay fit to a |g|g(|Dt) spectrum produced by gating on the 1346|g below the isomer and the 981|g and 1603|g above the isomer 
CONF$|n(i{-11/2}{++1},j{-15/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$ Evaluated nuclear rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.5297 fm {I17} (2008 update of 2004An14 work available on http://cdfe.sinp.msu.ru). See also 2009An12 for trends of nuclear radii 
J$J=9/2 atomic beam (1986An06); |p=+ from L=4 in {+210}Pb(t,d) reaction. 
T$value of 1939Sa11 and 1965Nu03 
MOMM1,MOME2$from atomic beam laser fluorescence spectroscopy (ABLFS) method (1986An06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$the measured lifetime agrees with that expected for a low-energy 27/2+ to 23/2+, E2 transition. This transition, however, was not observed by 2005La01. 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of values obtained from twelve sets of independent measurements, where more than 120 points per individual set were collected. Each set covered at least 10.2 half-lives. The individual values were deduced using a least-squares fit analys and a single exponential decay. Others: 36.1 min {I2} (1939Sa11), 36.1 min {I2} (1965Nu03) and 36.165 min {I37} (2015Ko09) 
$|DT{-1/2}: from relative standard deviation in 12 samples (0.011%), detector stability (0.026%), gas pressure (0.013%), background (0.011%) and dead time (0.012%) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from weighted average of the results of four different methods in 2018Lo02: 2169.77 s {I17} by the exponential regression analysis; 2169.94 s {I17} by the statistical sampling from the least-squared fit; 2170.01 s {I17} by the statistical sampling from the median; and 2169.84 s {I17} by the statistical sampling from the truncated mean. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from volume magnetic field configuration (2022Fr01). Other: 0.61 h {I4} from surface magnetic field configuration (2022Fr01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from 2017Ko16. Others: 10.67 h {I5} (1952Bu72), 10.64 h {I3} (1953Ma26), 10.643 h {I12} (1955To11), and 11.0 h {I6} (1995Ma90). 
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.5396 fm {I19} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from recoil-|g(t) in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g) 
E$interpreted as the maximally aligned (g{-9/2}){+2} configuration in {+9}Be({+238}U,X|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from the Adopted Levels; value is based on (t,p) data 
T$from recoil-|g(t) (2012Go19). Other: 5 |ms {I1} from 154|g(t) and 315|g(t) (1998Pf02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from volume magnetic field configuration (2022Fr01). Other: 10.91 h {I7} from surface magnetic field configuration (2022Fr01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T From 1964Bu05: measured from growth of {+213}Bi. 
J favored |a decay (HF=1.4) suggest a g{-9/2} to g{-9/2} transition between {+217}Po and {+213}Pb ground states (2004Li28). Also from analogy to {+215}Po and {+217}Rn isotones. Suggested configuration: |n (g{-9/2}{++1}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
Suggested configuration: |n (g{-9/2}{++3}) 
T$From sum of (176,190,311,369,488 and 772)|g(t) ({+238}U,X). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
Suggested configuration: |n (g{-9/2}{++3}) 
T$From sum (176,190,311,369,488 and 772)|g(t) (2021Va03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2+)
level_comment:
$Energy suggested by shell-model calculations, as ordering of the 311 and 176 keV |g rays is uncertain 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from 2011Vo01; Others: 26.8 min (1931Cu01) and 26.89 min {I3} (1991Ma68). The discrepancy between result of 2011Vo01 and 1991Ma68 was attributed to the loss of {+214}Bi from pumping in the measurement of 1991Ma68, as demonstrated in 2011Vo01. 
$|d<r{+2}>=+0.610 fm{+2} {I5} was deduced from the measured isotopic shift 11503 MHz {I20} relative to {+208}Pb (1986An06). 
$The rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.5577 fm {I23} was deduced from |d<r{+2}>=+0.610 fm{+2} {I5} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.567 fm {I7}; deduced from extrapolation of evaluated rms charge radii of {+208}Pb to {+214}Pb (2013An02), with slope k{-z}=0.36 in formula 9 of 2004An14 
E$ the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+215}Pb nuclei 
T$ from decay curves of |g rays (2013De20,2004DeZV). Other: 36 s {I1} reported in 1998RyZY was refuted by 2003Ku26 
J$ 9/2+ from systematics (2012Au07), and also proposed in 2013De20. 7/2 predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number (certainly more than few hundreds) of events are assigned to {+215}Pb. In 1998Pf02, number of events in figure 1 seems about 60. 
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected, and observed in 2013De20 
$ Production |s=51.7 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress); 90 nb {I20} (1998Pf02). Production cross sections measured in 2010Al24 are given in authors' figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Pb isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from {+215}Pb Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Sep 2013 update) 
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 98 s {I30} in latter). Method: (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. This value is in marginal agreement with 147 s {I12} in {+215}Pb Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, taken from 2013De20 (Phys. Rev. C87, 067303) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$Production |s=14.1 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress). Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Pb isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 
$From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number (certainly more than few hundreds) of events are assigned to {+216}Pb 
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of >100 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 7 min for |b decay (2012Au07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 (rounded to 99 s {I12} in latter). Method:(ion)|a correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. Other: 99.4 s {I175} from ion-|b correlated events (2017Ca12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected 
$Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Pb isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% Production |s=4.80 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number (certainly more than few hundreds) of events are assigned to {+217}Pb 
T$measured by 2017Ca12 (value of 20 s {I5} given in 2016Ca25,2014Ca23), from (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. 
E$the observed 20-s activity is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+217}Pb 
J$9/2 (1997Mo25, theoretical calculations); 9/2+ from systematics (2017Au03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, and has been observed by 2017Ca12. 
$In A/Z plot (Fig. 1 in 2010Al24), |?80 events are assigned to {+218}Pb 
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25 from (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. 
$Production cross section |s=1.43 nb {I14}(stat) {I29}(syst) measured by 2010Al24. values are given in Fig. 2 plot of |s versus mass number for Pb isotopes (also from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 to B. Singh from H. Alvarez-Pol). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected, thus 100% |b{+-} decay mode is assigned by inference 
$From A/Z plot (Fig. 1 in 2010Al24), |?35 events are assigned to {+219}Pb 
$Production |s=0.502 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress). Production cross section was measured in 2010Al24, and a plot of |s versus mass number for Pb isotopes is shown in their figure 2. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 
E$the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+219}Pb nuclei 
J$from systematics of g.s. J|p values in Pb isotopes above N=128: 9/2+ for {+209}Pb and {+211}Pb, (9/2+) for {+213}Pb. However, N=137 for {+219}Pb may lie above the g{-9/2} neutron orbital, and, depending on the deformation, may be associated with the j{-15/2} neutron orbital. Others: 11/2+ in 2021Ko07, 9/2+ in 2017Au03, both from systematics. |W(n)=1/2 neutron orbital in theoretical calculations (2019Mo01) 
T$half-life of {+219}Pb has not been measured, but expected to be <15 s from a decreasing trend of |b{+-} decay half-lives with increasing neutron number (measured half-lives of 15 s {I7} for {+218}Pb, 20 s {I5} for {+217}Pb and 1.65 min {I2} for {+215}Pb in 2017Ca12). From time-of-flight in separators, T{-1/2}>300 ns as in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup as in 2010Al24. 2021Ko07 suggest 3 s from systematic trend. Theoretical |b{+-} decay T{-1/2}=16.8 s (2019Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Production |s=71.9 pb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), 3 or 4 events are assigned to {+220}Pb 
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 8.3 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 30 s for |b decay (2011AuZY) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Pb isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A |a decay was observed, proton decay was not (2003An27). Based on gross |b-decay calculations (1973Ta30), the partial |b halflife is |?1 s implying %|e+%|b{++}|?1.3%. 
J the strongest |a's associated with {+184}Bi decay appear to Be unhindered (2003An27) and have E|a consistent with extrapolated E|a values from 10- and 3+ isomers known in heavier even-A Bi isotopes. This favors J|p=10- and 3+ for the observed {+184}Bi isomers. 
T from complex structure containing contributions from many |a groups with E|a=7120-7350 (2003An27). Other T{-1/2}: 14 ms {I+6-4} from 7194|a(t) (2003An27). 
7194|a from this level is coincident with {+180}Tl(124|g) (2003An27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A |a decay was observed, proton decay was not (2003An27). Based on gross |b-decay calculations (1973Ta30), the partial |b halflife is |?1 s implying %|e+%|b{++}|?0.7%. 
J see comment on J|p(0.0+x). 
T from summed statistics for shorter-lived |a groups (2003An27) (authors report T{-1/2}=8.1 ms {I+30-22} from 7445|a(t), T{-1/2}=6.7 ms {I+30-22} from possible (7730|a-7850|a)(t) and T{-1/2}=4.6 ms {I+19-13} from 7220|a-449|g(t)). 
7220|a from this level is coincident with {+180}Tl(449|g) (2003An27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
$%p=90 {I2}; %|a=10 {I2} (2004An07). Other: %p=85 {I6}; %|a=15 {I6} (2001Po05) 
T$weighted average of 60 |ms {I4} (2004An07) and 50 |ms {I8} (2001Po05) 
J$Ground states with J|p=9/2- and low-lying isomers with J|p=1/2+ have been observed for heavier Bi isotopes. In particular, for {+187}Bi, the 1/2+ isomer is at 112 {I21} keV (see discussion in 1996Da06). Since proton or alpha radioactivity from a 9/2- state was not observed, the evaluator assumes that the {+185}Bi ground state is indeed the 1/2+ state. 
$E(p)=1598 keV {I16} to the ground state of {+184}Po (2001Po05), S(p)=1607 keV {I16}. 2004An07 measured E(p)=1583 keV 16, but adopted the value from 2001Po05. 
$E(|a)=8080 keV {I30}, Q(|a)=8259 keV 31 from 2001Po05. 
$|s|?60 nb (2001Po05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X+74;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from combined p(t) and |a(t) (355 proton events and 30 |a events) (2021Do08). 
E$observation of single |g|g coincident event requires one or two intermediate states between the isomer and ground state (2021Do08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A Based on theoretical partial |b-decay half-life of 329 ms (2019Mo01) and measured half-life. 
$%|e+%|b{++}SF: Estimated from the ratio of observed fission events to observed alpha events from both isomers (2013La02). Assuming equal population of the two isomers, the |b-delayed fission probability was estimated with a factor of |? 5 uncertainty (2013La02). 
T$From 7263|a(t) (2003An27). Other: 15.0~ms~{I17} from 7261|a(t) (1997Ba21). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$%|b{++}F |? 0.022 
$%|b{++}F: Estimated from the ratio of observed fission events to observed alpha events from both isomers (2013La02). Assuming equal population of the two isomers, the |b-delayed fission probability was estimated with a factor of |? 5 uncertainty (2013La02). 
T$From 7070-7230|a(t) (2003An27). Others: 9.8~ms~{I13} from 7158|a(t) (1997Ba21), 10~ms~{I4} (1984ScZQ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A From 2006An11 - source of value is not clear. Other: %|a|>50 - value adopted in 1985Co06; source of value unclear. Gross |b decay theory calculations predict partial |b halflife to Be |?4 s (1973Ta30) or 2.4 s (1997Mo25), implying %|e+%|b{++}|?0.8 or 1.3, respectively, and hence %|a|?99. 
T Weighted average of 40 ms {I2} (7000|a(t)-2006An11), 32 ms {I3} (7000|a(t)-1999Ba45), 45 ms {I11} (7000|a(t)- 2002Hu14), 35 ms {I4} (6986|a(t)- 1984ScZQ). Others: 35 ms {I+14-8} (6994|a(t) and 7605|a(t) 2003Ke08), 25 ms {I+9-5} (7612|a(t), 1999Ba45), 21 ms {I+29-8} (7367|a(t), 1999Ba45). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E Deduced from the shape of the |a-decay spectrum and simulation ({+191}At |a decay (2.1 ms)). 
J From systematics of the heavier odd-mass {+189}Bi and {+191}Bi isotopes and simulation results (2003Ke08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%A From 2006An11 - source of value is not clear. Other: %|a|>50 - value adopted in 1985Co06; source of value unclear. 
T From 7721|a(t)-2006An11. Others: 0.29 ms {I+9-5} (7721|a(t)- 1999Ba45), 0.31 ms {I+19-9} (7552|a(t) (2003Ke08)), 0.8 ms {I6} for an E=7583 {I10} |a (1984ScZQ), this |a is absent in 2003Ke08 and 1999Ba45; assignment of this |a is questionable. 
E Using E|a=7721 {I15} from this level to {+183}Tl(g.s.) and E|a=7612 {I15} from {+187}Bi(g.s.) to {+183}Tl(g.s.) in 1999Ba45. E|a=7714 {I15} (2003Ke08). Consistent with observed smooth decrease of E(s{-1/2}) state in Bi with decreasing N. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J Supported by the measured value of T{-1/2} considering the characteristics of the low energy M2 transitions for isomeric states in this mass region. 
T Deduced from four 252|g events using the procedure described in 1984Sc13 to deduce lifetimes from a small number of events. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
E From adopted level and 7552|a from {+191}At g.s. to this level (2003Ke08). 
J From systematics. 2003Ke08 proposed |p(2p-1h) configuration. 
T From 7552|a(t) (2003Ke08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E Deduced by the authors (2003Ke08) from the shape of the |a-decay spectrum and simulation. 
J From systematics of the heavier odd-mass {+189}Bi and {+191}Bi isotopes and simulation result (2003Ke08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
E Using E|a=7721 {I15} from this level to {+183}Tl(g.s.) and E|a=7612 {I15} from {+187}Bi(g.s.) to {+183}Tl(g.s.) in 1999Ba45. Consistent with observed smooth decrease of E(s{-1/2}) state in Bi with decreasing N. 
J From adopted levels 
T From 1999Ba45 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
MOMM1$reported as 3.638 {I27} (stat) {I20} (syst); uncertainty combined in quadrature by compiler (2021Ba45). Relative to |m({+209}Bi)=4.0900 {I15}. 
MOME2$relative to Q({+209}Bi)=-0.420 b {I17}. 
$|d<r{+2}>{187,209}=-0.949 fm{+2} {I11} (syst) {I47} (stat) (2021Ba45) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$For results on beta-delayed fission see 2013La02, 1993An11 and 1993LaZT 
J$From favored decay to J|p=(3+) state in {+184}Tl, systematics of heavier Bi isotopes and proposed configuration 
T$from 6992|a(t) in 2003An26, supersedes 66 ms {I6} (6995|a(t), 2006An04). Others: 46 ms {I7} (6987|a(t),1997Wa05) and 44 ms {I3} (7010|a(t), 1984ScZQ). 
$Three |a decays from this state were observed in 2003An26: E|a=7106 {I5}, %I|a=2.05 {I19}; E|a=6992 {I5}, %I|a=97.2 {I2}; E|a=6889 {I10}, %I|a=0.33 {I10}. The 6992|a in coin with E1 117.5|g; the 6889|a in coin with E1 99.0|g. For decay studies see also 1997Wa05 and 1984ScZQ 
CONF$|ph{-9/2}~#|np{-3/2} from systematics of heavier odd-odd Bi isotopes (2003An26). This assignment is tentative, since E=117.5 keV in {+184}Tl is too low for such a 3+ state; 151 keV in {+190}Tl, 184 keV in {+188}Tl and 294 keV in {+186}Tl following the trend of 9/2- states in neighboring odd-mass Tl. The energy of favoured |a decay (E|a=6992 keV) is about 200 keV larger than expected between the 3+ states (2003An26). Furthermore, |a decay from low spin state in {+192}At does not follow systematics (2006An04). Oblate states in {+187}Bi and {+189}Bi are known at very low energies (2003Ke08), which may suggest an oblate configuration in {+188}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$Estimated in 2006An04, based on non-observation of summing of 7470|a keV and ce signals from the 65 keV {I29} level in {+192}At |a decay (11.5 ms) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$For results on beta-delayed fission see 2013La02, 1993An11 and 1993LaZT 
E$x=153 {I30} (syst,2017Au03) 
J$From favored decay to J|p=(10-) state in {+184}Tl, systematics of heavier Bi isotopes and proposed configuration 
T$from 2813|a(t) in 2003An26, supersedes 280 ms {I20} (2815|a(t),2006An04). Note, that a value of 265 ms {I10} is quoted in 2013La02 with a reference to 2003An26. Others: 218 ms {I50} (6815|a(t),1997Wa05) and 210 ms {I87} (6820|a(t), 1984ScZQ). 
$Four |a decays from this isomer observed in 2003An026: E|a=7302 {I5}, %I|a=3.3 {I9}; E|a=7232 {I10}, %I|a=4.1 {I9}; E|a=6995 {I15}, %I|a=1.4 {I4}; E|a=6813 {I5}, %I|a=91.2 {I12}. The 7232|a in coin with 70.5|g; the 6995|a in coin with 249|g and 320|g. 
CONF$|p1h{-9/2}~#|n1i{-13/2} (spherical) from systematics of heavier odd-odd Bi nuclei (2003An26,2006An04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (9-,10-)
level_comment:
J$165|g M1 to (10-) and proposed configuration in 2003An26,2006An04. 
CONF$ |p2f{-7/2}~#|n1i{-13/2} (spherical shape) in 2003An26,2006An04. However, |p7/2{+-}[514]~#|n7/2{++}[633] (or 9/2{++}[624]) and |p13/2{++}[606]~#|np{-3/2} (oblate shape) can be considered as alternatives (by the evaluators) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
E$From energy difference between the 7535 keV and 7470 keV |a decays 
T$Estimated value in 2006An04, based on the non-observation of summing of 7470|a keV and ce signals from the 65 keV level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
$in deducing %|b{++}F, %|b{++} 2-8 from theory is assumed by 2020An12. Based on this range in %|b{++}F, 2020An12 quote %|b{++}F=0.04 {I2} - 1.8 {I7}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_comment:
MOMM1$reported as 0.994 {I51} (stat) {I20} (syst); uncertainty combined in quadrature by compiler (2021Ba45). Relative to |m({+209}Bi)=4.0900 {I15}. 
MOME2$relative to Q({+209}Bi)=-0.420 b {I17}. 
$|d<r{+2}>{188,209}=-0.335 fm{+2} {I6} (syst) {I17} (stat) (2021Ba45) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
MOMM1$reported as 2.464 {I15} (stat) {I10} (syst); uncertainty combined in quadrature by compiler (2021Ba45). Relative to |m({+209}Bi)=4.0900 {I15}. 
MOME2$relative to Q({+209}Bi)=-0.420 b {I17}. 
$|d<r{+2}>{188,209}=-0.978 fm{+2} {I4} (syst) {I49} (stat) (2021Ba45) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
$This level is deexcited to g.s. by a group of 102|g, 127|g, 153|g, 165|g and 338|g as observed in the EVR-|a tagged |g-ray spectrum associated with {+188}Bi ground state. The detailed level scheme can't be constructed due to lack of |g|g-coin data (2022Zh46) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
$This isomer is deexcited to the 265-ms isomer by a cascade of 52|g, 81|g, (143)|g, and 243|g as observed in the EVR-|a tagged |g-ray spectrum associated with the 265-ms isomer of {+188}Bi and also gated by a |DT(EVR-|g)<1.5 |ms. The detailed level scheme can't be constructed due to lack of |g|g-coin data (2022Zh46). 
T$from EVR-243|g(t) (2022Zh46). Other: 0.35 |us {I10} from the combination of K{-|a,|b} X rays, 52|g and 81|g (2022Zh46) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_comment:
$This level is deexcited to an unknown level at 153+z by a cascade of 319|g, 366|g, and 462|g as observed in the EVR-|a tagged |g-ray spectrum associated with the 265-ms isomer of {+188}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12). Uncertainties of 0.28 (statistical) and 0.07 (systematic) combined in quadrature by evaluator 
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+189}Bi,{+209}Bi)=-0.792 fm{+2} {I44}(stat) {I55}(syst) (2017Ba12) 
J$M1 |g from (7/2-); |ph{-9/2} state 
T$from |a-decay (2007DoZW, Fig. 3, based on measured values of 689 ms {I2} for decay curve for 6672|a and 681 ms {I8} for 7107|a). Other measurements: 580 ms {I25} (2003Ke08); 667 ms {I13} (2002Hu14); 728 ms {I40}, |?1000 ms, 1.4 s {I+10-8} (1997Wa05), 680 ms {I30} (1984ScZQ), <1.5 s (1973Ga08). Weighted average of all the values, except the low value from 2003Ke08 is 686 ms {I5}, close to the adopted value here from 2007DoZW 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$Other %|a=50-100 (1985Co06) 
E$average of values from {+193}At |a-decay: 187 {I9} (2003Ke08), 182 {I8} (1997Wa05). Others: 190 {I40} (1995Ba75), 220 {I30} (1993An19), 92 {I7} (1985Co06). 
J$favored |a decay from (1/2+) parent; s{-1/2} state 
T$from 7287|a decay curve (1999An52 and 2007DoZW, same value obtained in the two independent measurements). Other measurements: 4.6 ms {I+8-6} (2003Ke08), 5.2 ms {I6} (1997Wa05), 4.8 ms {I5} (1997An09), 7.0 ms {I20} (1995Ba75,1997Wa05), 4 ms {I2} (1993An19), |?5 ms (1984ScZQ) and 5.4 ms {I2} (2007DoZW, from 7107|a). The uncertainty of 0.2 ms in 1995Ba75 was a misprint, it should have been 2.0 ms as explained in 1997Wa05, a later paper by the same group as 1995Ba75. Weighted average of all the values listed above also gives 5.0 ms {I1}, same as that from 1999An52 and 2007DoZW. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E$from {+193m}At |a decay (2003Ke08) 
$|p1i{-13/2} proton state. 
J$M2 |g to (9/2-) (2001An11). Favored |a decay from (13/2+) parent 
T$weighted average of 888 ns {I32} (2007DoZW, recoils-|a-|g correlation decay curve); and 880 ns {I50} (2002Hu14, recoil-|a-|g(t) in {+109}Ag({+82}Kr,2n|g),({+83}Kr,3n|g), note that units of ms in Fig. 2 and text of 2004Hu15 are misprints). Others: |?550 ns (2003Ke08, |a|g(t) in {+193}At, 27-ms, (13/2+) |a decay); |>360 ns {I120} (2001An11, recoil-|a-|g(t) in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p4n|g),E=239-307 MeV reaction) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
E$average of values from {+193}At |a-decay: 187 {I9} (2003Ke08), 182 {I8} (1997Wa05). Others: 190 {I40} (1995Ba75), 220 {I30} (1993An19), 92 {I7} (1985Co06). 
J$hindrance factor of |?1.2 suggests favored |a decay with the same J|p values for this level and the {+193}At g.s. parent 
T$Other: 4.6 ms {I+8-6} (from E|a=7295, 2003Ke08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$hindrance factor of |?1.8 suggests favored |a decay with the same J|p values for this level and the 5-keV level in {+193}At parent 
T$from |a|g(t) (2003Ke08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$hindrance factor of 1.8 {i9} suggests favored |a decay with the same J|p values for this level and the 39-keV level in {+193}At parent 
T$other: |?500 ns from |a|g(t) in {+193}At, 27-ms, (13/2+) |a decay (2003Ke08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 888 ns {I32} (2007DoZW, recoils-|a-|g correlation decay curve); 880 ns {I50} (2002Hu14, 357|g(t), note that units of ms in Fig. 2 and text of 2004Hu15 are misprints). Other: |>360 ns {I120} (2001An11, recoils-|a-|g(t) in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p4n|g),E=239-307 MeV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
MOMM1$reported as 3.667 {I6} (stat) {I20} (syst); uncertainty combined in quadrature by compiler (2021Ba45). Relative to |m({+209}Bi)=4.0900 {I15}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
MOME2$relative to Q({+209}Bi)=-0.420 b {I17}. 
$|d<r{+2}>{189,209}=-0.859 fm{+2} {I2} (syst) {I43} (stat) (2021Ba45) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$Beta-delayed fission mode has been observed by 2020An12, with measured partial T{-1/2}=2.8|*10{+7} s {I+134-21}. Evaluators deduce %|b{++}F=2.3|*10{+-5} {I+69-19} 
E$determined to be g.s. by 2020St11 based on spacing=182 {I57}, and 171 {I62} deduced by the evaluators, between the (10-) and the (3+) states 
J$from syst of neighboring Bi nuclides. Probable configuration=|p1h{-9/2}~#|n3p{-3/2} (2001An11) 
T$from decay curve for 6430|a (1988Hu03). Others: 7.7 s {I+10-8} (2013Ny01), 6 s {I+4-2}, 5.7 s {I8} (1991Va04). Weighted average of all the results is also 6.3 s {I1}. The |a decay peak at 6431 from {+190}Bi decay is also shown by 2001An11 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12), using |m({+209}Bi)=4.1103 |m{-N} {I5} as a reference. Statistical and systematic uncertainties of 0.092 and 0.077, respectively in 2017Ba12, combined in quadrature by the evaluators. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+190m}Bi,{+209}Bi=-0.839 fm{+2} {I19}(stat) {I59}(syst) (2017Ba12) 
$|a-decay energy=6422 {I10} (2013Uu01), 6428 {I6} (2013Ny01), 6431 {I5} (1991Va04, 2003An26), 6429 {I5} (1988Hu03), 6429 (1993An19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
$Beta-delayed fission mode has been observed by 2020An12, with measured partial T{-1/2}=4.7|*10{+7} s {I+226-35}. Evaluators deduce %|b{++}F=1.3|*10{+-5} {I+39-11} 
E$from Q{-|a}({+190}Bi 10- isomer to {+186}Tl 7+ isomer)- Q{-|a}({+190}Bi 3+ g.s. to {+186}Tl 2- g.s.)+E({+186}Tl 7+). The two Q{-|a} values of 6966 {I5} and 6861 {I5} are deduced from measured E{-|a}=6819 {I5} and 6716 {I5} in 2003An26, respectively, for corresponding |a decays. E({+186}Tl,7+)=86 {I65} is from measured mass excess=-19491 {I32} (2014Bo26) for {+186}Tl 10- isomer with known E|g=374.2 keV from the 10- isomer to 7+ isomer, and mass excess=-19951 {I56} for {+186}Tl 2- g.s. from deduced {+186}Tl g.s. mass=185978582 |mu {I60} by 2020St11 from measured Q(alpha)({+186}Tl g.s. to {+182}Au g.s.)=5924 {I52}, and known masses of {+182}Au and {+4}He. The value of 191 {I65} is in agreement with 182 {I57} in 2020St11. Other: 130 keV {I40} (2017Au03). 
J$from 1988Hu03 with probable configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|ni{-13/2}. 
T$from timing of 6455|a (1988Hu03). Others: 5.9 s {I+10-8} (2013Ny01), 5.9 s {I6} (1991Va04), 5.4 s {I5} (1972Ga27, 1974Le02). A 14 s activity reported by 1967Tr06 probably belongs to {+191}Bi. Weighted average of all the four results is 6.16 s {I10}. 
$%|a: others: |?90 (1974Le02), |?32 (1972Ga27), based on observation of a single |a group at 6450 {I10}. The |a decay peak at 6456 from {+190}Bi decay is also shown by 2001An11 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12). Value given in 2017Ba12 is 2.40 |m{-N} {I12}(stat) {I5}(syst). Value of |m({+209}Bi)=4.1103 |m{-N} {I5} was used as a reference. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+190m}Bi,{+209}Bi=-0.860 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I60}(syst) (2017Ba12) 
$|a-decay energy=6450 {I5} (2013Ny01), 6456 {I5} (1991Va04, 2003An26), 6455 {I5} (1988Hu03), 6455 (1993An19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
E$(3+) determined to be g.s. by 2020St11. See Adopted Levels 
J$2013Ny01 suggest that J|p could also be (2-) connecting 121 and g.s. through 76.5, E1 transition from 121, 3+ |) 0.0, 2- with a possible configuration=|p3s{-1/2}{+-1}~#|n3p{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$measured by 2009An11. Other: 0.50 |ms {I10} from decay loss of {+190}Bi nuclei during the flight through the velocity filter SHIP at GSI (2001An11), assuming that the isomer decays 100% to the (10-) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>{+191,209}=0.810 fm{+2} {I2} (stat) {I40} (syst) (2021Ba45) assuming supersedes their earlier value in 2017Ba12 |d<r{+2}>{+191,209}=-0.772 fm{+2} {I9} (stat) {I54} (syst). 
$%|a from 2003Ke04, %|e+%|b{++} from difference to 100% (2003Ke04). Others: 40|<%|a|<77 (1985Co06); %|a|?19 (1972Ga27). 
J$from systematics of heavier odd-A Bi nuclides. Supported by the hindrance factor (HF=0.75) of the 6308-keV |a ray to the (9/2-) 335-keV level in {+187}Tl, indicating an unhindered transition. A spherical configuration is proposed for this level (1985Co06,2004Ni06), with the h{-9/2-} proton coupled to the even-even Pb core. 
T$weighted average of: 12.4 s {i4} (2003Ke04), 13.0 s {I+21-15} (1999Ta20), 12 s {i1} (1985Co06), 13 s {i1} (1974Le02), and 12.0 s {i7} (1972Ga27). Uncertainty is the lowest input value. 
MOMM1$From 2021Ba45 (In Source Laser Spectroscopy), supersedes their 2017Ba12 value. Uncertainty of magnetic moment is combined one of 0.009 (stat) and 0.024 (syst). Other: 3.66 {I5} (2019StZV based on 2017Ba12 - 3.680 {I48} stat {I70} syst). 
MOME2 Q{-s}=-1.41 {I13} (2021Ba45) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from (M1) multipolarity of deexciting 148.7-keV |g in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p2n). Also favored 7075 keV |a transition from the (7/2-), 32-keV level in 143-ms {+195}At |a decay. Configuration: 7/2-[514] (2005Ke10). 
T$from prompt coincidences (resolving time <10 ns) of the deexciting 148.7-keV |g-ray with the 7075-keV |a ray feeding this level from the (7/2-) isomeric state in {+195}At (2003Ke04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
$%|a, %|e+%|b{++}, %IT from 2003Ke04. Other: 50|<%|a|<100 (1985Co06), %IT=22 {I6} (2013Ny01). 
E$Average of 238.4 {I40} [from E|a=6871 {I3} ({+191}Bi (1/2+) to {+187}Tl (1/2+) in 2009Ba12 evaluation) and Q|a=7680 {I3} (2021Wa16)] and 245.0 {I70} [from E|a=6953 {I3} ({+195}At (1/2+) to {+191}Bi (1/2+)) and Q|a=7344 {I6} (2021Wa16)]. Also 242 keV {i4} (2021Ko07 - NUBASE). 
J$from unhindered character of |a transitions, both for the one from {+195}At g.s. decay, and for the one decaying to the {+187}Tl g.s., both of which have been assigned J|p=(1/2+). The J|p for this level is interpreted as due to a (2p-1h) intruder state, with a s{-1/2} proton promoted across the Z=82 shell gap. 
T$Weighted average of 121 ms {I+8-7} (2003Ke04), 156 ms {I+27-20} (1999Ta20), 115 ms {i10} (1999An36), and 150 ms {i15} (1985Co06,1981Le23). Other: 20 s {I15} (1974Le02) (outlier). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$from systematics of (13/2+) levels in neighboring Bi nuclei. 
T$from recoil-|g(t) in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p2n) (2004Ni06). Earlier value from the same group was 533 ns {i7} (2001Ni04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
$Decay mode of |?100% by isomeric transitions is assumed by the evaluator 
E$the existence of this level is inferred from the half-life of 400 ns observed (2004Ni06) for the 578-keV |g ray. This |g is placed from an 1825.1, (21/2-) level in 2015Ny02, but from a 1271-keV level in 2004Ni06. There is no discussion about isomer decays in 2015Ny02. 
T$from recoil-578|g(t) (2004Ni06 - ({+52}Cr,p2n|g)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from the multipolarity of the |g-ray to the (9/2-) g.s., possible values are (7/2-,9/2-,11/2-). The absence of any |g transition connecting to the 429.7-keV 13/2+ level, indicates 7/2- as the most probable value for this level. Supporting evidence is provided by the low hindrance factor of the 7075-keV |a decay from the 7/2- level in {+195}At to this level (2003Ke04). 
T From Adopted Levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E,T$from Adopted Levels. 
J$from systematics for 1/2+ intruder states in all Bi isotopes from the N=104 neutron mid shell to N=126 (1985Co06,2001Ni04). Confirming evidence is provided by the hindrance factors of both the |a decay feeding this level ( E(|a)=6953 keV, HF=0.92) from the 1/2+ {+195}At g.s., and deexciting it ( E(|a)=6870 keV, HF=1.5) to the 1/2+ {+187}Tl ground state (2003Ke04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J from systematics of (13/2+) levels in neighboring Bi nuclei and (M2) multipolarity of the |g ray to the (9/2-) g.s. 
T$from recoil-|g(t) (2004Ni06). Earlier value from the same group was 533 ns {i7} (2001Ni04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
$This state (9/2+) is discarded in the adopted dataset since the 324.2|g from this level is reassigned in 2015Ny02 from a 933,(9/2+) level. A comparable level energy 747 keV of J{+|p}=(15/2+) is present in the adopted dataset. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
$This level is discarded in the Adopted dataset since the 397.6|g from this level is reassigned by 2015Ny02 from a 1332, (13/2+) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
$This level is discarded in the Adopted dataset since the 578.0|g from this level is reassigned in 2015Ny02 from an 1825, (21/2-) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E$the existence of this unknown level is inferred from the half-life observed for the 578-keV |g ray deexciting the 1271-keV level (2004Ni06,2003NiZZ). Due to the reassignment of 578.0|g from an 1825, (21/2-) level, this level is listed in the Adopted dataset with energy 1825+x 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_comment:
$This level is discarded in the Adopted dataset since the 482|g from this level is reassigned in 2015Ny02 from an 1815 (1813 in adopted), (17/2+) level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_comment:
$This level is discarded in the Adopted dataset since the 385|g from this level is reassigned in 2015Ny02 from a 1982, (23/2+) level; and 710|g from this level is not reported in 2015Ny02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,J,T From Adopted Levels. Also 242 keV {i4} (2021Ko07 - NUBASE). Adopted E|a=6953 {I3} and Q|a{+195}At=7344 {I6} (2021Wa16) yields 245 keV {I7}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from prompt coincidences (resolving time <10 ns) of the deexciting 148.7-keV |g-ray with the 7075-keV |a ray feeding this level from the (7/2-) isomeric state in {+195}At (2003Ke04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E From Adopted Levels. Other: 241 keV in 2015Ny02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%|a: from |a|g coin assuming 30% {I10} of {+192}Bi |e decays from a similar source (studied earlier by several of the same authors) proceeded via the low-spin isomer (1991Va04). Other: |?20% (1974Le02). 
T from |a-X(t) and/or |a-|g(t) (1991Va04). Other values: 33 s {I2} (1987Va09 from |g(t)), 37 s {I3} (1988Hu03 from |a(t)). Others: see comment on T{-1/2}(0+x level). 
Probable configuration=((|p h{-9/2})(|n f{-7/2} or |n f{-5/2})) (1991Va04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%|a: from |a|g coin assuming 30% {I10} of {+192}Bi |e decays from a similar source (studied earlier by several of the same authors) proceeded via the low-spin isomer (1991Va04). 
T from decay of 6052|a (1988Hu03). Other values: 40.6 s {I9} (1991Va04), 44 s {I5} (1988Hu03, 6348|a(t)), 39 s {I2} (1987Va09, |g(t)). Others (presence of more than one {+192}Bi isomer possible): 1966Si11, 1967Tr06 (see note above), 1972Ga27, 1974Le02, 1997Pu01. 
Probable configuration=((|p h{-9/2})(|n i{-13/2})) (1988Hu03, 1991Va04) coupled to deformed Hg core; J=10 member of multiplet  
E from mass excesses for {+192g}Bi (-13546 {I33}, 2011AuZZ) and {+192m}Bi (-13399 {I9}, 2008We02). Other: 105+y from E|a data for the 34.6-s, and 39.6-s |a decays, with y=[E(7+, {+188}Tl)-E(2-, {+188}Tl)]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12). Value given in 2017Ba12 is 4.18 |m{-N} {I17} stat {I8} syst; uncertainty combined in quadrature by the evaluator. Value of |m({+209}Bi)=4.1103 |m{-N} {I5} was used as a reference. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+192,209}=-0.786 fm{+2} {I13} stat {I55} syst 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12). Value given in 2017Ba12 is 2.37 |m{-N} {I12} stat {I5} syst; uncertainty combined in quadrature by the evaluator. Value of |m({+209}Bi)=4.1103 |m{-N} {I5} was used as a reference. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+192m,209}=-0.807 fm{+2} {I10} stat {I56} syst 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>{+209-193} = -0.729 fm{+2} {I7} (stat) {I51} (syst) 
J$From systematics for ground states for odd-A Bi, and for At parent and Tl daughter nuclei; from the hindrance factors for the 6960-keV |a transition from the (9/2{+-}) {+197}At g.s. (HF=1.2) (see {+197}At |a-decay dataset below), and for the 5899-keV |a decay to the 281-keV 9/2{+-} level in {+189}Tl (HF 5); and from shell-model and TRS calculations (2004Ni06 - ({+32}S,4n|g)). 
T$Weighted average of 63 s {i5} (1985Co06), 64 s {i4} (1974Le02). Other: 62.2 s {i36} (1972Ga27) 
%A From 2005De01. Others: 3.5% {I15} quoted in 1993An19 from 1990AnZR and 2|< I{-|a} |< 8% (1986Co12). 
%EC+%B+ T{-1/2}(|b{++})=55 s (1997Mo25, theory) suggests predominately |e+|b{++} decay. 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Value is given as 3.734 |m{-N} {I59} (stat) {I74} (syst); listed combined uncertainties in quadrature. |m=4.1103 {I5} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
MOME2$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Q=-0.420 {I8} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209-193} = -0.606 fm{+2} {I8} (stat) {I42} (syst) (2016Ba42). 
$|d<r{+2}>{+m,g}=0.123 fm{+2} {I7} (stat) {I9} (syst) (2016Ba42) 
E From nubase2016 (2017Au03) 
J This level decays by an E(|a)=6475 keV {i5} transition to the (1/2{++}) {+189}Tl g.s. Values for the hindrance factor for this decay are HF=0.75 {i45} (1985Co06), and 0.9 {i2} (1986Co12), indicating that the initial and final states have the same configuration. 
T$Weighted average of 3.07 s {i13} (2015He27), 3.5 s {i2} (1974Le02, 1972Ga27), and From 1.4 s {I+38-6} (2005Uu02). Other: 3.15 s (1970Ta14), 1.9 s {i4} (1985Co06). 
%A Average from: a) comparison of intensity of {+193}Bi (3.3 s) |a peak with that of {+197}At (2.0 s) parent peak, 90 {I+10-20} (1986Co12), and b) 75 {i25} (1985Co06) 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Value is given as 1.500 |m{-N} {I14} (stat) {I30} (syst); compiler has combined uncertainties in quadrature. |m=4.1103 {I5} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$measured by 2015He27 ({+32}S,4n|g) from (recoil)(455.4|g)(t) 
$Proposed configuration=|pi{-13/2} coupled to oblate 8+ state in {+192}Pb with configuration=|ph{-9/2}{+2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E Level energy from 2017Au03: NUBASE-2016. 2015He27 list as 307 keV. 
%A From Adopted Levels 
T$Measured by 2015He27 from distribution of time difference between recoil implantations and detection of |a particle from the decay of 1/2+ isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$Assigned as (19/2-) in 2015He27. First author later stated that level should have no J|p assignment due to lack of information on the depopulating transition (private communication by e-mail between first author and XUNDL compiler). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$measured by 2015He27 from (recoil)(455.4|g)(t) 
$Proposed configuration=|pi{-13/2} coupled to oblate 8+ state in {+192}Pb with configuration=|ph{-9/2}{+2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+194}Po,{+209}Po)=-0.727 fm{+2} {I21} (stat) {I51} (syst) (2017Ba12,2017Mo44). 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12), uncertainties of 0.099 (stat) and 0.084 (syst) combined in quadrature by the evaluators. Value of 4.19 {I13} in 2017Ba12 is evaluated to 4.17 {I10} in 2019StZV 
%A$from 1991Va04. Other value: 0.066 (1985HuZY), <0.15 (1972Ga27). 
J$populated by favored (HF|?3) |a decay from {+198}At(J|p=(3+)) (1992Hu04). Probable configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#(|nf{-7/2}+|nf{-5/2}) (1987Va09). 
T$from |a decay curve (1991Va04). Others: 94 s {I5} from (1988Hu03); 106 s {I3} (1987Va09) from decay curves for 1308|g and 930.6 (E0) lines, both seen in the decay of all the three {+194}Bi activities; 105 s {I15} (1974Le02) from the decay of a 5.61 MeV {I2} |a, which includes the 5598|a (from {+194}Bi (10-) decay) and the tail from the 5645|a (from {+194}Bi (3+) decay). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+,7+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$from evaluated mass excess of -16023 {I5} (2021Wa16) for the g.s. and measured mass excess of -15878 {I50} (2008We02), where dominant activity is associated with the medium-spin of {+194}Bi. However, original uncertainty of 14 keV is increased to 50 keV to account for a possible mixture of the other two long-lived activities in {+194}Bi. 
J$|e population to levels with J=5 through 8 in {+194}Pb. Systematics of J|p=6+,7+ in neighboring odd-odd bismuth isomers. Probable configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|np{-3/2} (1985HuZY). 
T$from |g decay curve (1987Va09, probably erroneously quoted by the authors as mean-life). Other value: 120 s {I18} (1976Ch30, |g-decay curve). 
$No |a decay mode has been detected from this isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+194m}Po,{+209}Po)=-0.737 fm{+2} {I14}(stat) {I52}(syst) (2017Ba12) 
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12), uncertainties of 0.11 (stat) and 0.05 (syst) combined in quadrature by the evaluators. Value of 2.47 {I12} in 2017Ba12 is evaluated to 2.46 {I11} in 2019StZV 
%A$From 1991Va04. Other value: 0.21 (1985HuZY). 
E$deduced by 2019Gh11 from |a-decay data. Others: 184 {I12} deduced from measurement of mass excesses of {+190m}Tl, {+194}Tl, {+194m}Tl and {+198}At, and analysis of other masses through |a-decay chains (2013St25) 
J$favored |a decay with HF|?2 from {+198}At (J|p=(10-)). Probable configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|ni{-13/2} (1988Hu03) 
T$from |a-decay curve (1991Va04). Other measurement: 116 s {I4} (1988Hu03, from |a-decay curve). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$633.1|g |DJ=0, (E1) to (10-); 528.6|g E1, |DJ=1 to (9-); bandhead 
T$estimated by 2020He17 from recoil shadow anisotropy method (RSAM) in {+159}Tb({+40}Ar,5n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-,11+)
level_comment:
J$negative POL value suggests |DJ=0, E1 or |DJ=1, M1 576.0|g to (10+). No J|p assignment in 2020He17 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12-,13+)
level_comment:
J$negative POL value suggests |DJ=0, E1 or |DJ=1, M1 456.7|g to (12+). No J|p assignment in 2020He17 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13-,14+)
level_comment:
J$negative POL value suggests |DJ=0, E1 or |DJ=1, M1 738.1|g to (13+). No J|p assignment in 2020He17 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13-,14+)
level_comment:
J$negative POL value suggests |DJ=0, E1 or |DJ=1, M1 842.6|g to (13+). No J|p assignment in 2020He17 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (26)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level energy is either 2403.1+x or 2384.6+x as, according to 2020He17, ordering of the 285.8|g and 267.3|g is tentative 
J$285.8|g to (25); band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
$2020He17 suggest this level as an isomer from absence of transitions from the lower-lying structures in their |g|g-coin spectra. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
E$taken by 2020He17 from 2019Gh11. Level energy, without uncertainty, kept fixed in least-squares fitting procedure 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
$There is a slight non-physical negative intensity balance of -2.8 {I5} at this level. However, the intensity of the 539.4|g from this level is given only as a lower limit. Intensity balance suggests I|g(539.4)=5.1 {I5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_comment:
$There is a slight non-physical negative intensity balance of -7 {I4} at this level. One reason could be that multipolarity of 107.9|g feeding transition from the 1018.5 level is not established 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (26)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level energy is either 2403.1+x or 2384.6+x as, according to 2020He17, ordering of the 285.8|g and 267.3|g is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: [9/2-]
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%A,%EC+%B+$from %|a=0.01-0.05 (1985Co06). Others: %|a|<0.02 (1990AnZR), <0.2 (1991Ry01,1986BrZQ,1974Le02), <0.15 (1972Ga27). 
J from shell model (1986Lo05). Configuration=|ph9/2+|n0+ (1986Lo05) 
T from |a(t) measurement in {+195}Bi |a decay (183 s) (1985Co06). Others: 187 s {I4} (1984Co13), 170 s {I20} (1974Le02), 240 s (1970Ta14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: [1/2+]
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%A,%EC+%B+$from %|a=16- 49 (1985Co06). Others: %|a=4 (1974Le02), 3.9 (1972Ga27). No evidence of IT decay has been observed (from systematics (1980Sc26), the largest B(M4)(W.u.)(s1/2 to h9/2) observed in this mass region is <2. If one assumes that limit is valid here, then, with E|g=401 {I7}, |a(401|g)=5.6 {I4}, where the uncertainty comes from uncertainty in E|g, and T{-1/2}=87 s {I1}, one gets %IT<6.). 
E from {+195}Bi |a decay (87 s). 
J from shell model. Configuration=|ps1/2 intruder state (1985Co06) 
T$from |a(t) measurement (1985Co06). Others: 90 s {I5} (1974Le02), 100 s {I15} (1984Co13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Others: 0.625 us {I+2013-208} (2003Gl05),0.71 us {I28} (2004Gl04) 
J from shell model (1986Lo05). Configuration=|ph9/2+|n12+ (1986Lo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E seen in all of the time curve measurements. The existence is inferred, although no low-energy |g-ray seen. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E$Total Routhian Surface calculations for three-quasiparticle configurations suggest an oblate deformation for this isomeric state. Suggested configuration from systematics of high spin isomers of neighboring isotopes=|pi{-13/2}~#|n{-9{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: [9/2-]
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Value is given as 3.862 |m{-N} {I56} (stat) {I77} (syst); compiler has combined uncertainties in quadrature. |m=4.1103 {I5} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
MOME2$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Q=-0.420 {I8} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209-195} = -0.674 fm{+2} {I11} (stat) {I47} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: [1/2+]
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Value is given as 1.536 |m{-N} {I8} (stat) {I31} (syst); compiler has combined uncertainties in quadrature. |m=4.1103 {I5} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
MOME2$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Q=-0.420 {I8} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209-195} = -0.548 fm{+2} {I9} (stat) {I38} (syst) (2016Ba42). 
$|d<r{+2}>{+m,g}=0.127 fm{+2} {I8} (stat) {I9} (syst) (2016Ba42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J from comparison to {+194,192}Bi ground state and probable configuration=((|p h{-9/2})(|n f{-5/2})+(|n f{-7/2})) (1987Va09). |e decay feeding to low-spin states in {+196}Pb (up to J=5 quoted by 1991Va04). 
|p: 158|g M3 from (5+,6+) state. 
T the data of 1987Va09 supersede 308 s {I6} of 1984Va11 from |g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J 158|g M3 to (3+), probable configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n f{-7/2})(|n f{-5/2})) 
T from |g(t), 158|g's short-lived component (1987Va09). 
This is two times faster than the Weisskopf estimate for an M3 transition. Besides a direct feeding (0.6 s component), this (5+,6+) state has to Be fed via 210 s {I20} component. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E from |DQ(|a). 
J probable configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n f{-7/2})+(|n f{-5/2})) (1987Va09). 
T from |g(t) (1987Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J 102|g (E3) to (7+), probable configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n i{-13/2})) (1987Va09). 
Other: %|e+%|b{++}=78, %IT=21, %|a=0.0003 {I1} (1992Hu04). 
T from |g(t) (1987Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J |b decay feeds levels in {+196}Pb up to J=5 (quoted by 1991Va04). 
T the data of 1987Va09 supersede 308 s {I6} of 1984Va11 from |g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
T from |g(t), 158|g's short-lived component. This is two times faster than the Weisskopf estimate for an M3 transition. Besides a direct feeding (0.6s component), this (5+,6+) state has to be fed via 210 s {I20} component. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E energy difference between (10-) and (7+) is 102 keV {I7} from |a decay of {+200}At. 
T from |g(t) (1987Va09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
No |a decay observed. 
J HF=1.4 from (9/2-) in {+201}At |a decay (89 s) and systematics of odd Bi isotopes. 
T$from |g(t) (1991Va09). Other: |?1 min (systematics, 1980Sc26,1973Ta30) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=SY;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%A From 1985Co06. Others: %|a|?0.05 (1950Ne77); see also 1984Co13, 1974Le02, 1972Ga27. 
E,J from systematics. Low-lying 1/2+ isomers are populated in {+199}Bi, {+201}Bi, {+203}Bi at |?667, 846, 1098 keV, respectively. 
T from unweighted average of 4.88 min {I75} (1991Va09) and 5.2 min {I6} (1985Co06). Others: 9.0 min {I2} (1984Co13), 9.5 min {I10} (1970Ta14), 8.0 min {I5} (1966SiZZ), |?10 min (1972Ga27,1974Le02). 
%IT,%|e+%|b{++}: undetermined. L-forbidden M4 transition to g.s. unobserved; compatible with large HF(M4). %IT|<6.8 for {+201}Bi, %IT|?0.3 for {+199}Bi, %IT|?0 for {+195}Bi. 
Isomeric decays of 1/2+ states in {+199}Bi, {+201}Bi (3s1/2 to 1h9/2) studied by 1980Br23. 
|a decay of 1/2+ isomers in odd-Bi isotopes (A=191-201) compared with theory (1978Va21). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level decays to 1968 through a low energy |g of E|g=x 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
An E1 transition would be expected from the systematics of 29/2 isomers observed in the heavier odd Bi isotopes. A search for low energy delayed |g rays with the planar HPGe detector produced no candidates for this transition, suggesting that X|<40 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
An E1 transition would be expected from the systematics of 29/2 isomers observed in the heavier odd Bi isotopes. A search for low energy delayed |g rays with the planar Ge detector produced no candidates for this transition, suggesting that X|<40 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Value is given as 3.918 |m{-N} {I80} (stat) {I78} (syst); compiler has combined uncertainties in quadrature. |m=4.1103 {I5} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
MOME2$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Q=-0.420 {I8} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209-197} = -0.596 fm{+2} {I13} (stat) {I42} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=SY;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Value is given as 1.607 |m{-N} {I31} (stat) {I32} (syst); compiler has combined uncertainties in quadrature. |m=4.1103 {I5} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
MOME2$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2016Ba42). Q=-0.420 {I8} for {+209}Bi was used as reference value. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209-197} = -0.449 fm{+2} {I17} (stat) {I31} (syst) (2016Ba42). 
$|d<r{+2}>{+m,g}=0.128 fm{+2} {I10} (stat) {I9} (syst) (2016Ba42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
%EC+%B+$no |a decay observed 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) (2014Pa53) 
T Other: 11.85 m {I18} (1968Ha37). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$This level decays by |e+|b{++} decay and no |g transition from this level is known. Thus the excitation energy of this state remains unknown. 
J$248.5|g E3 from 10- 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) (2014Pa53) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E From {+198}Bi IT decay (7.7 s). 
T From |g(t) in {+198}Bi IT decay (1972Ha73) 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) (2014Pa53) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_comment:
MOMM1$from in-source laser spectroscopy (2017Ba12). Value given in 2017Ba12 is 2.458 |m{-N} {I66} stat {I49} syst; uncertainty combined in quadrature by the evaluator. Value of |m({+209}Bi)=4.1103 |m{-N} {I5} was used as a reference. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+198m,209}=-0.571 fm{+2} {I12} stat {I40} syst 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
%|a|?3|*10{+-5} from |a syst (1980Sc26), 
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|nj{+-10}{-0+} 
J$spin from atomic beam (1959Ax98); |p from |m and shell-model systematics for |ph{-9/2} orbital 
T from 1964Si11; other: 25 min {I5} (1950Ne77) 
MOMM1$static nuclear orientation (1988Wo12,2005St24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%A$from 1950Ne77, 1964Si11, 1970DaZM. 
%IT$from 1980Br23; other: |<3.2% (1985St02) 
E$from 2003Au02. 1980Br23 and 1985St02 searched for the isomeric transition from this 3s{-1/2} level (1980Br23 in the energy region 400-900 keV and 1985St02 in the region of 500-1000 keV) in both |g and ce spectra. No obvious candidate was found. However, both found an unassigned conversion line, which, if ce(K) in Bi, corresponds to E|g=667 keV. Since this was the strongest unassigned conversion line in the spectrum, an upper limit could be determined for the isomeric M4 transition. Thus the %IT was estimated to be |<2% (1980Br23), |<3.2% (1985St02). If the 667|g is the isomeric transition with %IT|<2, and if the multipolarity is pure M4, then B(M4)(W.u.)|<0.0017. Other: 680 from level (3s{-1/2} states in Bi nuclides and Q(|a) systematics (1980Sc26) 
T from |a decay (1966Ma51); others: 24.5 min {I4} (1970DaZM), 24.4 min {I5} (1964Si11), 25 min (1950Ne77) 
J$from syst of |a-decaying isomers and of retarded M4 transitions (1980Sc26,1980Br23). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
J M1+E2 |g to 9/2-, |g cascade from 1647, 17/2+ requires J>9/2 
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|nj{+-2}{-2+}~#|nj{+-8}{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J |g deexcitation suggests 1/2+, 3/2+ or 5/2+; syst of positive parity (single proton hole) levels suggests 2d{-5/2} (see {+201}Bi,{+203}Bi,{+205}Bi) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
J stretched E2 |g to 13/2- 
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}p{-3/2}{+-1}+f{-5/2}{+-2}) {-4+}~#|nj{+-8}{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=0, E1 |g to 17/2- 
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}i{-13/2}{+-1}+f{-5/2}{+-1} i{-13/2}{+-1}){-5-}~#|nj{+-8}{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J stretched (E2) |g to 17/2+ 
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}i{-13/2}{+-1}+f{-5/2}{+-1} i{-13/2}{+-1}){-7-}~#|nj{+-8}{-0+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$from syst and shell-model calculation of 1985Pi05 for Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}i{-13/2}{+-1}(9-)~# |nj{+-8}(0+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1959Ax98); |p from the proposed configuration and systematics of single-particle states in the region 
T$From 1970DaZM. Other: 35 min {I5} (1950Ne77) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x=100 keV {I70} estimated in 2021Ko07 
J$From systematics and the observed feeding to the 2+ state in {+200}Pb following {+200}Bi |e decay (1972Kr08) 
T$From 1978LiZM in {+200}Po |e decay 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$428.2|g E3 to 7+; systematics of similar isomers in neighboring odd-odd Bi isotopes 
T$From 428.2|g(t) in {+193}Ir({+12}C,5n|g) (1972Ha73) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1960Li03); favored |a-decay from {+205}At (J|p=9/2-,2018Cu02); |m 
T$Weighted average of 110 min {I10} (1950Ne77), 111 min {I4} (1956St05), 94 min {I3} (1966KaZY), 96 min {I12} (1970Jo26) and 106.2 min {I24} (1970DaZM) 
MOMM1$Using static nuclear orientation with |g-ray detection technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$%IT from {+201}Po |e decay (15.50 min), %|a from |a HF syst. 
J$846.3|g M4 to 9/2- 
T$Weighted average of 62 min {I8} (1950Ne77), 52 min {I2} (1964Si11), 59.1 min {I6} (1966Ma51) and 57 min {I5} (1970DaZM) 
$E{-|a}=5240 keV {I6} (1966Ma51) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$195.9|g E1 to 5/2-; 240.1|g M1+E2 to 1/2+ 
T$From 188.5ce(K)-239.8ce(K)(|Dt) in 1986Be07 ({+201}Po |e decay (15.50 min)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J$296.1|g to 5/2-; 1186.7|g M1(+E2) to 9/2-; observation in {+201}Po |e decay (15.50 min, J|p=3/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2)-
level_comment:
J$566.6|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-, 1470.9|g to 9/2-. Direct |e feeding of this level in {+201}Po |e decay (15.50 min, J|p=3/2-) excludes 9/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
J$534.2|g to 13/2-, 537.5|g to 11/2-, 1502.4|g (E3) to 9/2-. Strong population of this level in {+201}Po |e decay (8.96 min, J|p=13/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$271.91|g E1 to 17/2-. |g(|q)'s are consistent with |DJ=0, dipole transition. 
T$From |g|g(t) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) using the centroid shift analysis. Other: 9.6 ns {I6} from |g|g(t) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)) using gates on 272|g, 412|g and 967|g below the isomer (stop) and 186|g above the isomer (start). The prompt response function is obtained using |g|g(t) spectrum with gates on 412|g and 967|g (start) and 272|g (stop). One should note, however, that there is a difference between the time walk for the 186|g and 272|g, and hence, this value may be not so accurate. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$185.77|g E2 to 17/2+ 
T$Estimated from the 185.8|g(t) data in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)). The absence of prompt component in the time spectrum produced by gating on the 185.8|g, shown in figure 4(c) in 1985Pi05, suggests that 185.8|g depopulates an isomeric state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$From syst (analogy to {+203}Bi and {+205}Bi) and shell-model calculations in 1985Pi05 
T$From |g|g(t) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) using time-difference spectra between 617.3|g with 967.4|g, 411.9|g, 271.9|g and 185.8|g. Other: 210 ns {I20} from |g|g(t) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)) using gates on 617|g above the isomer (start) and 186|g, 272|g, 412|g and 967|g below the isomer (stop). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$From systematics and shell-model calculations in 1985Pi05 
T$From |g|g(t) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) using time-difference spectra between 679.8|g with 967.4|g, 411.9|g, 271.9|g and 185.8|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$88.88|g to (29/2+), 190.49|g (E1) to (27/2+); proposed configuration 
T$From 617.3|g(t) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)). Other: 160 ns 30 from |g|g(t) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)) using gates on 617|g above the isomer and 186|g, 272|g, 412|g and 967|g below the isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$The absence of prompt component in the time spectrum produced by gating on the 185.8|g, shown in figure 4(c) in 1985Pi05, suggests that 185.8|g directly depopulates an isomeric state. 
T$Estimated value from 185.8|g(t) in 1985Pi05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$X is expected to be less than 80 keV (1985Pi05), otherwise a |g-ray transition would be observed. The assignment is consistent with the energy difference between the J|p=7- and 9- states in {+200}Pb, as well as with the systematics in neighboring {+203}Bi and {+205}Bi isotopes. 
T$From |g|g(|Dt) using time-difference spectra between 617.3|g with 967.4|g, 411.9|g, 271.9|g and 185.8|g (1985Pi05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 27/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(|Dt) using time-difference spectra between 679.8|g with 967.4|g, 411.9|g, 271.9|g and 185.8|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) in 1982Br21 using gates on 272|g, 412|g and 967|g below the isomer (stop) and 186|g above the isomer (start). The result is compared to the |g|g(t) value deduced using 412|g and 967|g (start) and 272|g (stop), but one should note that there is a difference between the time walk for the 186|g and 272|g, and hence, the value quoted for the half-life may be somewhat higher than it should be. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T$From |g|g(t) in 1982Br21 using gates on 617|g above the isomer (start) and 186|g, 272|g, 412|g and 967|g below the isomer (stop). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) in 1982Br21 using gates on 617|g above the isomer (start) and 186|g, 272|g, 412|g and 967|g below the isomer (stop). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$%IT determined by the evaluator from intensity balance considerations at the 846.35-keV level, using I(|g+ce)(1/2+)=130 {I4} and I(|e+|b{++})(1/2+)=20 {I5}, determined from I(|e+|b{++})(3/2+,1086-keV)=18 {I4} and by assuming log {Ift}(1/2+)=log {Ift}(3/2+,1086-keV). Other: %IT=6.8% in 1980Br23 (same collaboration as 1986Br28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$From atomic beam measurement (1959Ax98); |m. Direct |e+|b{++} feeding to 4+ states in {+202}Pb favor J|p=5+ rather than 6+. 
T$Weighted average of 1.67 h {I2} (1966KaZY), 1.79 h {I3} (1970DaZM) and 1.6 h {I2} (1970Jo26). Others: 1.58 h (1951Ka03), 
MOMM1,MOME2$Measured by laser spectroscopy relative to {+209}Bi, using |m({+209}Bi)=4.093 {I5} (2019StZV) and Q({+209}Bi)=-0.516 {I15} (2001Bi23). Originally reported |m({+202}Bi)=+4.259 {I14} using |m({+209}Bi)=4.1106 {I2} (1996Ca02,2000Bi23) and Q({+202}Bi)=-0.72 {I8} using Q({+209}Bi)=-0.370 {I26} (1996Ca02,2000Bi23). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+209}Bi,{+202}Bi)=-0.342 fm{+2} {I8} (1995Ca11). 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1}). The assignment is tentative, based on the unfavored |a decay from the J|p=(5)+ ground state of {+206}At (configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1})) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From the |a energy difference of 5774 keV {I4} and 5767 keV {I3} in {+206}At |a-decay; 
J$From syst of 7+ levels in neighboring nuclei 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}). The assignment is tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_comment:
E$From 68 keV {I3} M1 |g ray to 5+. 
J$Favored |a decay from the J|p=(5)+ ground state of {+206}At 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x<40 keV in {+203}Tl(|a,5n|g) (1981Th03). 
J$From systematics of similar isomers in neighboring odd-odd nuclei; |m 
T$From 597.8|g(t) in {+203}Tl(|a,5n|g) (1981Th03). 
MOMM1$From g=0.255 {I3} (1982Hu07); Other: g=0.236 {I23} (1980Kl06); both values using the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. The expected value for a pure configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) is |m=+2.64. 
MOME2$Recommended in 2021StZZ, based on 0.07 eb 3 (1981Th03, integral perturbed angular distribution), 0.12 eb 2 (1987Ma65, time dependent perturbed angular distribution), 0.12 eb 1 (1990Ha30, level mixing spectroscopy) and 0.12 eb 2 (1991Sc14, level mixing spectroscopy) 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (15-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$217.2|g E2 to (13-), 519.7|g E1 to (14+) 
T$From 325.8|g(t), 371.4|g(t) and 624.1|g(t) in {+203}Tl(|a,5n|g) (1981Th03). 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}). The assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (17+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$From systematics of similar isomers in neighboring odd-odd nuclei; |m 
T$From 217|g(t), 326|g(t), 520|g(t), 624|g(t), 712|g(t) and 866|g(t) in {+203}Tl(|a,5n|g) (1981Th03). 
MOMM1$Recommended in 2020StZV, from g=0.121 {I3} (1982Hu07), determined using the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. 
MOME2$Recommended in 2021StZZ, based on Q(17{++})=0.40 {I2} in 1987Ma65 determined using the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}). 
$It is unlikely that the isomer decays via 50.7-keV, M2 transition to the 2546.37+x-keV, 15- level, since B(M2)(W.u.) |? 14 W.u., which would exceed RUL by more than 3|s. It is suggested in 1981Th03 that the depopulating transition is most likely E1 or E2, thus requiring an intermediate level with J|p=15+, 16- or 17- which has not been observed yet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x<40 keV (1981Th03). 
T$From 597.8|g(t) (1981Th03). 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 
MOMM1$From g=0.255 {I3} (1982Hu07); Other: g=0.236 {I23} (1980Kl06); both values using the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. The expected value for a pure configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) is |m=+2.64. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 15-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 325.8|g(t), 371.4|g(t) and 624.1|g(t) (1981Th03). 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}). The assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (17+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 217|g(t), 326|g(t), 520|g(t), 624|g(t), 712|g(t) and 866|g(t) (1981Th03). 
$It is unlikely that the isomer decays via 50.7-keV, M2 transition to the 2546.37+x-keV, 15- level, since B(M2)(W.u.) |? 14 W.u., which would exceed RUL by more than 3|s. It is suggested in 1981Th03 that the depopulating transition is most likely E1 or E2, thus requiring an intermediate level with J|p=15+, 16- or 17- which has not been observed yet 
MOMM1$From g=0.121 {I3} (1982Hu07), based on the time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$atomic beam (1959Li50), |p from |m 
T$From 1960St21. Others: 11.5 h {I10} (1958Fr53), 12.3 h {I7} (1956St05) and 12 h {I1} (1950Ne77) 
MOMM1$Recommended in 2019StZV. |m=+4.017 {I13} in 1996Ca02 using the gas cell laser spectroscopy technique 
MOME2$using gas cell laser spectroscopy technique (2001Bi23,2016St14); Others: -0.67 {I7} (1996Ca02) and -0.68 {I6} (1959Li50) 
$|d<r{+2}>(203,209)=2.77 {I7} in relative units (1995Ca11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$189.5|g E3 to 7/2-; 204.7|g M2(+E3) to 5/2- 
T$Weighted average of 311 ms {I13} (189.5|g(t)), 320 ms {I50} (204.7|g(t)), 290 ms {I30} (893.5|g(t)) and 304 ms {I5} (908.6|g(t)) in 1984Lo16. 
CONF$Dominant (99.9%) configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{++1}) with small admixtures of configuration=|p(f{-7/2}){++1})~#|n(3{+-}) and configuration=|p(h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(5{+-}) (1984Lo16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J$214.8|g M1+E2 to 7/2-, 240.4|g (E2) to 11/2-; strong direct feeding in {+203}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-). Note, that J|p=9/2- was assigned in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J$186.5|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-; 1277.5|g M1(+E2) to 9/2-; direct feeding in {+203}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$214.8|g M1+E2 to 1/2+; 419.3|g E1 to 5/2-. 
T$From 175ce(K)-215ce(K)(|Dt) in {+203}Po |e decay (1986Be07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)-
level_comment:
J$361.6|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-; non observation in {+203}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) would argue against J|p=5/2- and 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$87.1|g E2 to 17/2+ 
T$Using 655.6|g(t) and 883.4|g(t) in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14). Other: 90 ns {I26} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1978Hu02) using a two isomers fit to ce|g(t) spectra. 
MOMM1$From g-factor=0.266 {I4} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1982Hu07,2014StZZ) deduced using |g(t) spectra produced by gating on 315|g, 883|g and 932|g that occur in decay of both the 21/2+ isomer and the 25/2+ isomer at 2042 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$50.9|g E2 to 21/2+ 
T$From {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1978Hu02) using a two isomers fit to ce|g(t) spectra. 
MOMM1$From g-factor=0.266 {I4} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1982Hu07,2014StZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$ 822.9|g M1(+E2) to 3/2+, 1037.7|g to 1/2+, 1242.4|g E1 to 5/2-; direct feeding in {+203}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$799.0|g to 5/2+; 973.9|g to 3/2+; 1188.7|g to 1/2+; direct feeding in {+203}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$301.3|g E1 to 27/2+ 
T$Weighted average of 19.1 ns {I20} (301|g(t)), 23.3 ns {I10} (689|g(t)) and 22.0 ns {I20} (814|g(t)) in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1978Hu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$1817.5|g to 3/2+; 2032.5|g to 1/2+; 2236.9|g to 5/2-; direct feeding in {+203}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$74.2|g M1 to 35/2- 
T$Weighted average of 4.03 ns {I10} (296|g(t)), 4.21 ns {I10} (498|g(t)) and 4.21 ns {I20} (644|g(t)) in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1978Hu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 311 ms {I13} (189.5|g(t)), 320 ms {I50} (204.7|g(t)), 290 ms {I30} (893.5|g(t)) and 304 ms {I5} (908.6|g(t)) in 1984Lo16. 
CONF$Dominant (99.9%) configuration=|p(s{-1/2}{++1}) with small admixtures of configuration=|p(f{-7/2}){++1})~#|n(3{+-}) and configuration=|p(h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(5{+-}) (1984Lo16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$From the observed coincidences between the in-band |g rays and 497.5|g, depopulating the 31/2- level at 3529.7 keV (1994Da17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 1978Hu02 using a two isomers fit to ce|g(t) spectra. 
$g-factor=0.266 {I4} using |g(t) spectra produced by gating on 315|g, 883|g and 932|g that occur in decay of both the 21/2+ isomer and the 25/2+ isomer at 2042 keV (1982Hu07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From 1978Hu02 using a two isomers fit to ce|g(t) spectra. 
$See the comment for the 21/2+ level at 1991 keV regarding the g-factor details. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 19.1 ns {I20} (301|g(t)), 23.3 ns {I10} (689|g(t)) and 22.0 ns {I20} (814|g(t)) in 1978Hu02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 4.03 ns {I10} (296|g(t)), 4.21 ns {I10} (498|g(t)) and 4.21 ns {I20} (644|g(t)) in 1978Hu02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$atomic beam 
T$From 1960St21. Others: 11.6 h {I2} (1956We14), 11.0 h {I5} (1958Fr53), and 11.2 h {I3} (1966KaZY) 
MOMM1$From 1996Ca02,2000Bi23 using laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy technique. Others: 4.48 {I22} (1988Wo12) and +4.28 2 (1959Li50) 
MOME2$From 1996Ca02 and 2000Bi23 using laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy technique. Others: -0.68 {I20} (2001Bi23) and -0.43 {I4} (1959Li50) 
$Configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++1}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
J$53.4|g M1 to 6+; nonobservation of |g's to 4+ and 5+ favors 7+ 
$Configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++1}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$752.1|g E3 to 7+ 
T$From {+204}Bi IT decay (1974Ra25). Other: a value of 13 ms is confirmed in {+205}Tl(|a,5n|g),{+203}Tl(|a,3n|g) (1981Lo09). 
MOME2$From 1990Ha30, 1991Sc14 using the LEMS technique. The value of 0.0630 {I12}, quoted in Table II in 1991Sc14, seems to be a typo. 
MOMM1$From g=0.236 {I23} (1980Kl06) using the in-beam TDPAD technique. The values was corrected for Knight and diamagnetic shifts. 
$Configuration=((|p h{-9/2})(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$1003.31|g M1 to 4+; 459.90|g from 1478.37-keV level, which is directly populated in {+204}Po |e decay (J|p=0+), argues against J|p=5+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$1016.29|g E1 to 3+; 539.5|g M1 from 1- 
T$270|g-1016|g(t) in 1970BrZP. The lifetime assignment to this level is tentative. It is possible that the lifetime is associated with the 1099-keV level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2)+
level_comment:
J$582.70|g M1 to 1+; direct feeding in {+204}Po |e decay (J|p=0+) favors 0+,1+, but 459.90|g (M1) to (3)+ favors J|p=2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$229.94|g M1 to (1)-; 534.92|g M1 to 1-,2-; 1419.0|g to 2+; direct feeding in {+204}Po |e decay (J|p=0+) favor 1- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$181.8|g M2 to 15-, 918.1|g E3 to 14- 
T$From 1974Ra25 in {+204}Bi IT decay (1.07 ms). Other: a value of 1 ms is confirmed in {+205}Tl(|a,5n|g),{+203}Tl(|a,3n|g) (1981Lo09). 
$Configuration=((|p h{-9/2})(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}(|n i{-13/2}){+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$270|g-1016|g(t) in 1970BrZP. The assignment to this level is tentative. It is possible that the lifetime is associated with the 1099-keV level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?;ISO=M1
level_comment:
MOME2$0.063 {I12} in 1990Ha30, 1991Sc14 using the LEMS technique. The value of 0.0630 {I12}, quoted in Table II in 1991Sc14, seems to be a typo 
$g=0.236 {I23} (1980Kl06) using in-beam TDPAD technique. The value was corrected for Knight and diamagnetic shifts. 
$Configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++1}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1959Li50); |p from L=5 in {+204}Pb({+3}He,d),(|a,t) (1973Er08) 
T$From |g(t) in 2004Ku33, based on three different samples that resulted in 33 data set fits for 12 gamma rays with emission probabilities per decay greater than 2%. The measurements were carried out over 60 days. Others: 15.31 d {I4} (1961Br19), but no details were presented by the authors, 15.3 d {I7} (1958Fr53) and 14.5 d (1951Ka03) 
MOMM1$From (1997Ki15,2000Pe30) using laser resonant fluorescence spectroscopy technique. Other: +4.16 {I10} (1975Ma08) 
MOME2$From (2001Bi23,2016St14), corrected from -0.585 {I43} (1997Ki15,2000Pe30) using laser resonant fluorescence spectroscopy technique. 
$|D<r{+2}>(205,209)=-1.92 {I15} (1975Ma08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$212.0|g M1+E2 to 1/2+; 836.8 E1 to 5/2-. 
T$From ce|g(t) using a spectrum produced by gating on E(ce)(K) for 261.0|g(above)-|g(below) the isomer in 1986Be07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$720.5|g M2 to 17/2-. 
T$From 697.3|g(t) and 881.3|g(t) in 1982Lo14. Other: 80 ns {I15} using a two isomers fit to 176ce(K)-|g(t) spectra in 1978Hu02. 
MOMM1$2.70 {I4} and 2.741 {I11} from the measured g-factors of g=0.257 {I4} (1982Hu07) and g=0.261 {I1} (1981BeYR), respectively. Gamma rays deexciting the 17/2+ state were used in conjunction with the perturbed angular distribution method, thus both the 21/2+ and the 25/2+ isomers contribute to the measured g-factor. The expected difference between the two g-factors is too small to be distinguished in the measurements (1981BeYR,1982Hu07), e.g. g-factor(21/2+)=0.30 {I2} and g-factor(25/2+)=0.26 {I1} (1982Hu07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$74.5|g E2 to 21/2+ level; 640.9|g and 1059.1|g from 27/2+. 
T$ From 1978Hu02 using a two isomers fit to 176ce(K)-g(t) spectra 
MOMM1$3.21 {I5} and 3.263 {I12} from the measured g-factors of g=0.257 {I4} (1982Hu07) and g=0.261 {I1} (1981BeYR), respectively. Gamma rays deexciting the 17/2+ state were used in conjunction with the perturbed angular distribution method, thus both the 21/2+ and the 25/2+ isomers contribute to the measured g-factor. The expected difference between the two g-factors is too small to be distinguished in the measurements (1981BeYR,1982Hu07), e.g. g-factor(21/2+)=0.30 {I2} and g-factor(25/2+)=0.26 {I1} (1982Hu07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2)
level_comment:
J$1701.2|g to 5/2-; 1724.1|g to 7/2-; 2574.2|g to 9/2-; direct feeding in {+205}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)-
level_comment:
J$From L=1+3 in {+204}Pb({+3}He,d),(|a,t). 
CONF$ 60% {Il}=1 (|p(p{-3/2}){++1}) and 40% {Il}=3 (|p(f{-5/2}){++1}) components (1973Er08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$L=3 in {+204}Pb({+3}He,d),(|a,t); 1242.3|g to 3/2+; 1711.8|g to 7/2-; direct feeding in {+205}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$599.9|g E1 to 27/2+. 
T$From ce(K)(t) for 600|g and 641|g in 1977Br05. Other: 2.45 ns in 1983Hu15. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From ce|g(t) using a spectrum produced by gating on E(ce)(K) for 261.0|g(above)-|g(below) the isomer in 1986Be07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$ From 1978Hu02 using a two isomers fit to 176ce(K)-|g(t) spectra 
MOMM1$|m=2.70 {I4} and 2.741 {I11} from the measured g-factors of g=0.257 {I4} (1982Hu07) and g=0.261 {I1} (1981BeYR), respectively. Gamma rays deexciting the 17/2+ state were used in conjunction with the perturbed angular distribution method, thus both the 21/2+ and the 25/2+ isomers contribute to the measured g-factor. The expected difference between the two g-factors is too small to be distinguished in the measurements (1981BeYR,1982Hu07), e.g. g-factor(21/2+)=0.30 {I2} and g-factor(25/2+)=0.26 {I1} (1982Hu07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$ From 1978Hu02 using a two isomers fit to 176ce(K)-g(t) spectra 
MOMM1$|m=3.21 {I5} and 3.263 {I12} from the measured g-factors of g=0.257 {I4} (1982Hu07) and g=0.261 {I1} (1981BeYR), respectively. Gamma rays deexciting the 17/2+ state were used in conjunction with the perturbed angular distribution method, thus both the 21/2+ and the 25/2+ isomers contribute to the measured g-factor. The expected difference between the two g-factors is too small to be distinguished in the measurements (1981BeYR,1982Hu07), e.g. g-factor(21/2+)=0.30 {I2} and g-factor(25/2+)=0.26 {I1} (1982Hu07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1969Fu11); |m 
T$From 1961Br19 and 1962Pe08. Other: 6.3 d {I6} (1959Li50) 
MOMM1$LASER spectroscopy (1997Ki15,2000Pe30). Others: +4.56 {I6} (1959Li50) and 4.48 {I22} (1988Wo12). Note that 2019StZV gives +4.341 {I8}, based on 1997Ki15. 
MOME2$LASER spectroscopy (1997Ki15,2000Pe30). Other: -0.43 {I4} (1959Li50). Note that 2021StZZ gives -0.54 {I4}, based on 2000Pe30 
$For isotope shift data see 1995Ca11 and 2000Pe30 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$59.908|g E2 to 6+; non observation in {+205}Tl(|a,3n|g) and {+208}Pb({+76}Ge,x|g) favors 4+ rather than 8+ 
T$Weighted average of 7.6 |ms {I2} (1975Ka13) and 7.8 |ms {I3} (1957Ar61) in {+206}Po |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
J$82.802|g M1(+E2) to 6+; non observation in {+205}Tl(|a,3n|g) and {+208}Pb({+76}Ge,x|g) favors 5+ rather than 6+ or 7+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
J$141.2|g M1+E2 to 6+; observation in {+205}Tl(|a,3n|g) and {+208}Pb({+76}Ge,x|g) favors 7+ rather than 5+ or 6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$818.231|g E2 to 4+; 468.983|g M1(+E2) to (2)+; non observation in {+205}Tl(|a,3n|g) and {+208}Pb({+76}Ge,x|g) would argue against J|p=6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$903.6|g E3 to 7+ 
T$From ce(t) in 1974Ra25. Other: 1.0 ms {I1} using 141|g(t), 229.4|g(t) and x-ray(t) in 1973Co30 
MOMM1$From g-factor=0.2644 {I14} in 1985No09, based on g-factor=0.2623 {I13} (1973Sc21) using the in-beam NMR-PAC technique, but corrected for diamagnetic and Knight shifts in 1985No09. Value also recommended in 2020StZV. 
MOME2$Using the level mixing spectroscopy technique (1991Sc14,2021StZZ). Other: 0.043 {I7} (1989Ra17). 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
J$32.532 M1+E2 to 1+; population in {+206}Po |e decay (J|p=0+) would argue against J|p=2+ assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 16.3 ns {I4} (543.5|g(t)), 15.9 ns {I3} (548.0|g(t)), 15.5 ns {I3} (266.4|g(t)), 15.1 ns {I5} (149.9|g(t)) and 14.3 ns {I5} (594.6|g(t)) in 1978Lo09 
CONF$|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (26+)
level_comment:
J$361.2|g M1+E2 to (25+) 
CONF$Likely a core-excited |p(h{-9/2}{++1})~# |n(i{-13/2}{+-3},p{-1/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}) configuration (2022Wa20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (28-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$713.2|g M2(+E3) to (26+) 
T$From |g|g(t) in 2012Ci05, by summing time difference spectra gated by 937-keV |g ray (above the isomer) and any of the 361, 480, or 458-keV |g rays (below the isomer) 
CONF$Likely a core-excited |p(i{-13/2}{++1})~# |n(i{-13/2}{+-3},p{-1/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}) configuration (2022Wa20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$937.2 [E3] to (28-) 
T$From |g(t) in 2022Wa20. Other: >2 |ms from |g(t) in 2012Ci05. 
CONF$Likely a core-excited |p(i{-13/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1},h{-9/2}{++1}) ~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-3}) configuration (2022Wa20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1$From g-factor=0.2644 {I14} in 1985No09, based on g-factor=0.2623 {I13} (1973Sc21) using the in-beam NMR-PAC technique, but corrected for diamagnetic and Knight shifts in 1985No09. 
MOME2$Using the level mixing spectroscopy technique (1991Sc14) 
T$From ce(t) in 1974Ra25. Other: 1.0 ms {I1} using 141|g(t), 229.4|g(t) and x-ray(t) in 1973Co30 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 16.3 ns {I4} (543.5|g(t)), 15.9 ns {I3} (548.0|g(t)), 15.5 ns {I3} (266.4|g(t)), 15.1 ns {I5} (149.9|g(t)) and 14.3 ns {I5} (594.6|g(t)) in 1978Lo09 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (26+)
level_comment:
CONF$Likely a core-excited |p[h{-9/2}{++1}]~# |n[i{-13/2}{+-3},p{-1/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}] configuration (2022Wa20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (28-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) in 2012Ci05, by summing time difference spectra gated by 937-keV |g ray (above the isomer) and any of the 361, 480, or 458-keV |g rays (below the isomer) 
CONF$Likely a core-excited |p[i{-13/2}{++1}]~# |n[i{-13/2}{+-3},p{-1/2}{+-1},g{-9/2}{++1}] configuration (2022Wa20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 2022Wa20. Other: >2 |ms from |g(t) in 2012Ci05. 
CONF$Likely a core-excited |p[i{-13/2}{++1},h{-11/2}{+-1},h{-9/2}{++1}] ~#|n[i{-13/2}{+-3}] configuration (2022Wa20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$L(p,t))=0+2; L({+3}He,d),(|a,t)=5; |m; 
T$From 2002Un02, using 4|p|g pressurized ionization chamber; stat. uncertainty 0.025 y and syst. uncertainty 0.033 y. No impurities in the sources were observed using HPGe; decay has been followed over a period of t |?28 years. The value agrees with that of 31.55 y {I5} reported by the same group (1992Un01), when decay was followed over a period of t |?19 years. The value is superior to others described below. 
$Others (not used in the present evaluation): 
$32.7 y {I8} (1991Li10) by measuring the activity of a calibrated {+207}Bi source (t|?17 years after the source was calibrated) with a HPGe detector; value determined by averaging activities for 569|g, (I|g=97.75%), 1063|g (I|g=76.0% {I14}) and 1770|g (I|g=6.95% {I13}); T{-1/2}=31.6 y {I7}, when the activity was deduced using 569|g only. The quoted uncertainty is statistical only. A sizable syst. uncertainty can be expected, given the uncertainties in the nuclear data parameters used in the calibration of the source 
$34.9 y {I4} (1990Al11) using a gas-flow proportional counter system; the uncertainty is stat. only and quoted at 2|s level; the source was produced by bombarding a Pb target with 22-MeV deutrons following chemical separation; the measurements were followed over a period of t=3.4 years. A break in the singles rates were observed around t=1.7 years after the beginning of the measurements,so the data were analyzed in two separate parts yielding T{-1/2}=34.88 y {I21} from the first 27 points (up to t=1.7 y) and 35.2 y {I9} from the next 8 points; the quoted T{-1/2} is higher than the adopted one. The quoted uncertainty is statistical only and large syst. uncertainty should be expected owing to sensitivity of the measurements to temperature and humidity changes. It is worth noting that T{-1/2}=66.6 y {I16} was reported by this group (1990Al11) for {+44}Ti, which is higher than other precise measurements of 58.9 y {I3} (2006Ah10) and 60.7 y {I13} (1999Wi01) 
$33.4 y {I8} (1978Ya04) deduced indirectly using the decay of a {+211}At source and knowledge of the |e/|a branching ratio of {+211}At (0.583/0.417), the emission probability of 6568 MeV |a to the 569.7 keV level of {+207}Pb (0.58% {I1}), the half-life of {+211}At (7.23 h {I2}) and the total emission probability of 569.7|g fed in {+207}Bi |e decay (99.85%). The quoted uncertainty is statistical only, but a large syst. uncertainty can be expected. The authors also quote a value of 32.2 y {I13} using disintegration rate of {+211}At in a purified sample measured by the means of a liquid scintillation counter and by adopting the 569.7|g to determine the decay rate of {+207}Bi. A measurement performed after a complete decay of {+211}At yielded T{-1/2}=32.2 y {I37}, whereby the large uncertainty was attributed to the poor detection efficiency of gamma counting of this particular sample. 
$38 y {I4} (1972Ru10) using a {+207}Bi source by counting the 569.7 keV gamma ray, using a NaI scintillation spectrometer over a period of t=0.5 years 
$38 y {I3} (1961Ap01) deduced indirectly using the decay of {+211}At source and knowledge of the |a branching ratio of {+211}At (40.9%), the half-life of {+211}At (7.214 h {I35}) and the total emission probability of 569.7|g that is fed in {+207}Bi |e decay (assumed 100% gamma-ray emission probability and 2.2% total |a). 
$28 y {I3} (1959So12) using the parent-daughter activity of {+207}Po and {+207}Bi 
MOMM1$+4.0915 {I9} (2000Pe30) using laser resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. Other: 4.081 {I9} (1985Ba21) using optical spectroscopy technique 
MOME2$-0.545 {I38} (2000Pe30) using laser resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. Other: -0.60 {I11} (1985Ba21) using optical spectroscopy technique 
$Isotope shift and hyperfine structure measured in 1971Ch03 and 2000Pe30 
CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=3; L(p,t)=2; 992.39|g M1+E2 to 9/2-; 249.745|g M1 to 7/2- 
CONF$Dominant |p(2f{-7/2}){++1} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$Population in {+206}Pb({+3}He,d),(|a,t) is questionable 
J$L(p,t)=2; 156.1|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-; 1148.47|g E2 to 9/2-; 911.77|g E1 from 3/2+ level at 2060.38 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0. However, 7/2- and 11/2- can not be unambiguously excluded; 1211.4|g M1 (with possible E0 admixtures) to 9/2- 
CONF$Possible |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#0{-2}{++} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
J$571.0|g M1+E2 to 11/2-; 1240.9|g E2 to 9/2-. 
CONF$Probable |p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#3{-1}{++} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
J$117.9|g and 426.1|g M1+E2 to 13/2-; non-observation of |g-ray transitions to levels with J<13/2 
CONF$Probable |p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#3{-1}{++} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=(4); 713.5|g M1 to 13/2-; 975.6|g E2 to 11/2- 
CONF$|p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-2}){-3{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (-)
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=(4). J>7/2 since not seen in {+207}Po |e decay, but non-yrast because not seen in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
J$307.81|g and 531.65|g M1+E2 to 5/2-; 222.030|g E1 from 1902 keV level (J|p=1/2+) would argue against J|p=5/2- and 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$947.9|g M1(+E2) to 7/2-; 369.51|g E1 from 3/2+ at 2060.38-keV level; note that the level is not fed directly in {+207}Po |e decay (J|p=5/2-) thus suggestion 9/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E$Population in {+209}Bi(p,t) is questionable 
J$222.030|g E1 to (3/2)-; 503.33|g (E2) from 5/2+ level at 2405.66 keV, 345.32|g M1(+E2) from 3/2+ level at 2060.38 keV 
CONF$Probable main configuration |p(3s{-1/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$911.7|g E1 to 5/2-; 2060.8|g (E3) to 9/2-; population in {+207}Po |e decay 
T$From 345.2K-|g(t) coin. in {+207}Po |e decay (1986Be07) 
CONF$Probable main configuration |p(2d{-3/2}{++1}) with small |p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#({+206}Pb){-3{+-}} octupole admixtures, compared with a similar state in {+209}Bi 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$456.1|g and 743.30|g E3 to 15/2- 
T$From |g(t) in 1969Be47. Other: 174 |ms {I20} (1967Co20) 
MOMM1$+3.41 {I6} (1972Ma24), using perturbed angular distribution technique, +3.43 {I2} (as quoted in 2005St24), using time perturbed angular distribution technique, and 3.46 {I5} (1974PrZF) 
MOME2$0.044 {I8} (1991Sc14) using level mixing spectroscopy technique 
CONF$|p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-6{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$386.8|g E1 to 27/2+ 
T$Weighted average of 11 ns {I1} (499.7|g(t)), 13 ns {I1} (899.3|g(t) and 14 ns {I1} (386.8|g(t)) in 1979Lo04 
CONF$|p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}){-12{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2-)
level_comment:
J$672.5|g to 29/2-. The assignment is tentative 
CONF$|p((1h{-9/2}){++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}){-12{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1969Be47. Other: 174 |ms {I20} (1967Co20) 
MOMM1$+3.43 {I4} from g=+0.327 {I4}, weighted average of g=+0.325 {I6} (1972Ma24) and 0.329 {I5} (1974PrZF) 
CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-6{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1969Be47. Other: 174 |ms {I20} (1967Co20) 
CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-6{+-}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 11 ns {I1} (499.7|g(t)), 13 ns {I1} (899.3|g(t) and 14 ns {I1} (386.8|g(t)) in 1979Lo04 
CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(i{-13/2}{+-2}){-12{++}} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$Not reported by 1973Er08. However, a weak transition is seen at 1150 keV in several spectra, but not at enough angles to warrant firm association with a level in {+207}Bi 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$from |m and L(p,d)=1 
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
MOMM1,MOME2$from 2000Pe30. The values supersede the incorrect values of 1997Ki15 
T from 1964Ha07. Other: 1959Mi19 
$Isotope shift measured (1983LaZZ, 2000Pe30, 2007Me09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J E2(+M1) |g to 5+ 
T from recoil distance plunger method in {+209}Bi({+17}O,{+18}O) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} + |p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
CONF$the second configuration is a small admixture 
J$M1 |g to 5+ 
T from recoil distance plunger method in {+209}Bi({+17}O,{+18}O) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} + |p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
CONF$the second configuration is a small admixture 
J$M1 |g to 5+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J E2 |g to 5+. M1 |g to 6+ 
T from {+209}Bi({+17}O,{+18}O). The authors observe a long-lived component in the 511 transition deexciting the 511 level. They point out that the intensity of this component is consistent with its being due to the cascade decay of the 651 level through the 511 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
T from Doppler-shift attenuation in {+207}Pb({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
T from Doppler-shift attenuation in {+207}Pb({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+,5+,6+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} 
J$|g's to 4+ and 6+. L(d,t)=1 or 3. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 5+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_comment:
J$|g's to 3+ and 5+. L(d,t)=1 or 3. |g from the 3- 1919 level. Feeding from the 2- 2894 level suggests that J|p Ne 4+; however, that branch is weak and the uncertainty in the branching is large. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 3+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+ and 4+. |g from 1+ 1802 level. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 2+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} multiplet 
T from Doppler-shift attenuation in {+207}Pb({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_comment:
J$|g's to 3+ and 5+. L({+3}He,d)=3. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 4+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
J$E3 |g to 7+ 
T from {+208}Bi IT decay 
MOMM1 From g=0.2672 {I14} in {+208}Bi IT decay, as given in 2005St24 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
J L=0 in {+210}Bi(9-)(p,t) 
$configuration: based on L-transfer in {+209}Bi(p,d). However, observation that L=0 in {+210}Bi(9-)(p,t), with configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n2g{-9/2}{+-1} for the {+210}Bi target requires the presence of core-excited components in the wavefunction (1979Er11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$|g to 4+. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as possibly being either the 6+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n2f{-5/2}{+-1} multiplet or the 5+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$|g to 2+. L(p,d)=1. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 3+ member of the indicated configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3,4,5+
level_comment:
J$|g's to 3+ and 4+ give J|p=2+,3,4,5+. L(|a,d)=(5) or (3) gives |p=-, suggesting J|p=3-,4-. The authors state that L is determined only within |+1. They give L=(5) in the main table, but in their angular distribution plot they include L=3 which gives just as good a fit. L=2 and 6 are definitely ruled out (evaluator) and L=4 also gives a poorer fit (evaluator). Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 4+ member of the |p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} multiplet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3,4+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-3/2}{+-1} 
J$|g's to 2+ and 4+. Suggested by 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) as the 2+ member of the indicated configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_comment:
$configuration={+206}Pb(0+)|p1h{-9/2}|n2g{-9/2} 
configuration: from {+206}Pb(|a,d) and {+210}Bi(9-)(p,t) 
J L=0 in {+210}Bi(9-)(p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3,4,5
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+ and 6-. Note that J|p=3- would require the 1114.6|g to Be M3, which, from B(M3)(W.u.)<10 would yield T{-1/2}>0.6 |ms. This is unlikely 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
J$|g's to 1+, 3- and 3+. The suggested J|p and configuration are proposed by 1973Cr05 in (p,d); however, the assignment there is very tentative. J|p and configuration are confirmed by agreement of |s(|q) in (p,n),(p,np') with an RPA calculation. The calculations of 2006Bo08 in (p,n|g) also confirm this assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p3p{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$|g to 4+ rules out the J|p=1+ alternative allowed by L({+3}He,d)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)-
level_comment:
$configuration={+206}Pb(0+)|p2f{-7/2}|n2g{-9/2} and {+206}Pb(2+)|p1h{-9/2}|n2g{-9/2} 
J$L(p,t)=2 
$configuration: from {+206}Pb(|a,d) and {+210}Bi(p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p3p{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
E$E({+3}He,t)=3174 {I25}. E(p,n)=3130 {I100} with L=0+1 so the (p,n) peak must include one or more adjacent levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n1h{-9/2}{+-1} 
$configuration: the level appears to have a |n2f{-7/2}{+-1} component also 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p3p{-3/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} 
J$|g's to 4+ rule out the J|p=1+ alternative allowed by L({+3}He,d)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
$configuration={+206}Pb(2+)|p1h{-9/2}|n2g{-9/2} 
J$the level is a doublet (from peak |G), both members of which have L=2 in {+210}Bi(9-)(p,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13+)
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1i{-13/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} 
$configuration: from {+208}Pb(p,n) (E=3400) 
J$from |s(|q) in (p,n) and assumption of stretched configuration. M1 |g to (12+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
$configuration={+206}Pb(2+)|p1h{-9/2}|n2g{-9/2} 
E$peak is a doublet in (|a,d) 
J L=2 in {+210}Bi(9-)(p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$on the basis of its energy, this peak in ({+3}He,t) might include the 3851, 3854 and/or 3886 levels. E=3920 {I100} in (p,n) with L=0+1 so the (p,n) peak must include one or more adjacent levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$on the basis of its energy, this ({+3}He,t) peak might include the 4013, 4015, and/or 4049 levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$configuration=|p1h{-9/2}|n2f{-7/2}{+-1} 
E$E({+3}He,t)=4621 {I25}. E(p,n)=4610 {I100} with L=0+1, so the (p,n) peak must include one or more other levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14-)
level_comment:
$configuration={+206}Pb(0+)|p1i{-13/2}|n1j{-15/2} 
J$L(|a,d)=(13). |g to (13+) and possibly to (11+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
$2003Fo03 in {+208}Pb({+48}Ca,X|g) state that they have established the presence of an isomer at about 9 MeV with a half-life of the order of 40 ns 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
WIDTH$other: 230 {I17} from ({+3}He,t) 
$|G(p)=130 {I4}; |G(p 3p1/2)=51.6 {I17}; |G(p 2f5/2)=20.6 {I17}; |G(p 3p3/2)=58 {I3}; |G(p 2f7/2)|<4. 
E$from {+207}Pb(p,p'),(pol p,p')IAR. Others: 15165 {I10} from {+208}Pb(p,n),(p,np'), 15171 {I18} from {+208}Pb({+3}He,t),(3hetp), ({+3}He,tn) 
J$|s(|q) isotropic in {+207}Pb(p,p') IAR. IAR of {+208}Pb g.s. 
|G: |G and |G(p 3p1/2) are from {+207}Pb(p,p) IAR. The inelastic widths are based on ratios given in {+208}Pb(p,np') IAS. |G(p)=|S|G(p nlj). Note that |G(p)=149 {I9} from {+207}Pb(p,p'),(pol p,p') IAR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$from L=0 and tp(|q) in ({+3}He,t),({+3}He,tp),({+3}He,tn). 
$configuration=Gamow-Teller resonance; 
$|G{-p}=58 keV {I20}, 102 keV {I31}, 8 keV {I9}, and 16 keV {I8} for proton decay to the 3p1/2, 2f7/2 + 3p3/2, 1i13/2, and 2f7/2 neutron hole states, respectively, in {+207}Pb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-,1-,2-
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
J$L=1, |DS=1 in (p,n) 
E$from ({+3}He,t). E=21500 {I1000} in (p,n) 
$|G: from (p,n) 
$configuration=isovector spin-flip dipole resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$L=0,|DS=1 in (p,n) 
CONF$assigned by 1980Ho21 as T=T{-0}, and interpreted as the analog of the M1 strength in {+208}Pb near 7.5 MeV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 2.6 ms {I1} (1961Gl16), 2.5 ms {I1} and 2.6 ms {I1} (1962Mo19), 2.7 ms {I1} (1966Me02), 2.53 ms {I5} (1967Hi08), 2.65 ms {I14} (1973Sa22), 2.7 ms {I1} (1976Ga33), and 2.58 ms {I26} (1995An36). Others:1986Ar12, 1958Du80 
g-factor: from NMR-PAD (1974Hu11). Authors' value is corrected for diamagnetic shift and Knight shift. The Knight-shift correction is from 1985No09, and is slightly different from that applied by the authors. The uncorrected value is 0.2658 {I14} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$from L=1 and non spin-flip nature of the (|p{++},|p{+0}) reaction at forward angles 
WIDTH$held fixed at 6 MeV. Value taken from RPA calculation as given by 1986Er09 
CONF$interpreted by authors as the electric isovector dipole resonance (see 1986Er09 and 1989Lo12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$from L=0 and non spin-flip nature of the (|p{++},|p{+0}) reaction at forward angles 
CONF$interpreted by authors as the electric isovector monopole resonance (see 1986Er09 and 1989Lo12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
$|G (MeV)=0.67 {IAP} 
E$other: 2800 {I200} (1980Ho21), 2700 (1981Ga26) 
J$|DS=1. Possibly the |p1h{-9/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1}2- state tentatively assigned in (p,d) to the 2894 adopted level. The configuration is confirmed by 1981Os09 from an RPA calculation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13+)
level_comment:
E$from 1984An08 
J$L|?12 from |s(|q) (1984An08) based on agreement with |s(|q) calculated for an assumed 0~h~w |p1i{-13/2}|n1i{-13/2}{+-1} stretched configuration. The authors point out that the observed peak may include an unresolved 11+ state with L=10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 15154 {I13} (1972Cr04), 15169 {I20} (1972Cr07), and 15188 {I20} (1974Fi14) from Q values with S(n)({+208}Pb)-S(p)({+208}Bi)=3660.8 {I20} 
J$see ({+3}He,t) 
CONF$isobaric analog of the {+208}Pb ground state 
WIDTH$202 {I34} (1972Cr07), 277 {I35} (1974Fi14 Gaussian), 235 {I35} (1974Fi14 Lorentzian), 280 {I50} (1973Wo04), 317 {I24} (1972Cr04). |G=231 {I6} from {+207}Pb(p,p') and 230 {I17} from ({+3}He,t). As pointed out by 1975Ga18 and 1977Bh02, the (p,np') reaction values are high because the analysis has not correctly taken into account a peaked background (probably due to evaporation) under the spectrum of protons deexciting the IAS. 
|G(2f5/2)/|G(3p1/2)=0.40 {I3}, |G(3p3/2)/|G(3p1/2)=1.12 {I4}. |G(2f7/2)/|G(3p1/2)|<0.08. These partial proton widths to levels in {+207}Pb are weighted averages of data of 1969Ig01, 1972Cr04 and 1973Wo04. The limit on the f7/2 value is from 1969Ig01. 1969Ig01 also report |G(2f5/2+3p3/2)/|G(3p1/2)=1.50 {I8}. 
$|s(|q) and |s(absolute) are well reproduced by a density-dependent DWIA calculation (1991An04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$|G (MeV)=0.67 {IAP} 
J$|DS=1 
CONF$assigned by 1980Ho21 as T=T{-0}, and interpreted as the analog of the M1 strength in {+208}Pb at 7.3 MeV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (1)-
level_comment:
$|G (MeV)=2.9 
E,L,WIDTH$from 1985Ni06. Other: E=24300 (1980St26) 
J$on the basis of random phase approximation calculations (RPA), 1981Os09 suggest that the |DL=1 peak at 21500 reported by 1980Ho21 and 1981Ga26, with bombarding energies of 120- and 200-MeV, respectively, is a superposition of all possible |DL=1, Ds=1 modes with J|p=0-,1-,2-, and of one |DL=1, Ds=0 mode with J|p=1-. Ds=0 is expected to be selectively excited at lower bombarding energies and Ds=1 at higher bombarding energies. Since the Ds=0 resonance is calculated to lie |?5 MeV above the 1- and 2- Ds=1 resonances, the peak reported at 23500 by 1985Ni06 using E(p)=41 MeV (and at 24300 by 1980St26 using E(p)=45 MeV) is thus probably the Ds=0 component. A dominant Ds=0 component in this peak is also suggested by 1985Ni06, on the basis of HF+tda calculations; however, Ds=1 contributions may be significant. This resonance thus corresponds in part to the T=T(0)-1 component of the analog of the electric isovector dipole resonance (GDR) in {+208}Pb. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$|G (MeV)=1.2 
J$|DS=1 
CONF Interpreted by 1980Ho21 as the T=T(0) component of IAS of M1 strength as yet unidentified in {+208}Pb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$The energy is from 1994Ak03. The uncertainty and the assignment of L|=0 are from a priv. Comm. from J. J~anecke. This peak probably corresponds to the adopted 2- level at 2893 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$configuration=isobaric analog of the {+208}Pb g.s. 
E$from 1991Ja04 
J$|s(|q)is isotropic for proton decay to states in {+207}Pb (1981Ga08) 
$|G{-p}=51 keV {I6}, 26 keV {I6}, 61 keV {I8}, and 3.3 keV {I5} for proton decay to the 3p1/2, 2f5/2, 3p3/2, and 2f7/2 neutron hole states, respectively, in {+207}Pb. Other: 1995Ak02 report 52 keV {I10}, 81 keV {I16}, and 3.6 keV {I17} for decay to the 3p1/2, 2f5/2 + 3p3/2, and 2f7/2 states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$configuration=Gamow-Teller resonance 
E$from 1995Ak02 
J$tp(|q) is consistent with J=1, not with J=0 (1981Ga08) 
L$from 1991Br20 
$|G{-p}=58 keV {I20}, 102 keV {I31}, 8 keV {I9}, and 16 keV {I8} for proton decay to the 3p1/2, 2f7/2 + 3p3/2, 1i13/2, and 2f7/2 neutron hole states, respectively, in {+207}Pb (1995Ak02). Earlier values from 1981Ga08 are discrepant. 1995Ak02 attribute the discrepancy to the fact that at the low bombarding energy used in 1981Ga08 the GTR is weakly excited, and other processes contribute to the triton-proton coincidence yield 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=isovector spin-flip dipole resonance in analogy with data in (p,n) 
E$from 1995Ak02. The value of 21.01 MeV {I5} given in 1994Ha40 is a typo 
$|G{-p}/|G=0.134 {I39} (2000Ak01). This value supersedes that of 0.141 {I42} in 1995Ak02 and 0.146 {I13} in 1994Ha40 
$|G{-p}=80 keV {I24}, 176 keV {I51}, 234 keV {I68}, 286 keV {I82}, 264 keV {I76}, and 82 keV {I23} for proton decay to the 3p1/2, 2f5/2, 3p3/2, 1i13/2, 2f7/2, and 1h9/2 neutron hole states, respectively, in {+207}Pb (2000Ak01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
E,T$the authors state that they have established the presence of an isomer at about 9.0 MeV with T{-1/2} of the order of 40 ns. No other data are given 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this is not the same level as that at 959.1 seen in (p,n|g) since the strong 896|g from that level in (p,n|g) is not seen here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|g-branching: 1064|g:1155|g=45:55. Note, however, that the 1155|g is also placed deexciting the 1805 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|g-branching: 1155|g:1171|g=55:45. Note, however, that the 1155|g is also placed deexciting the 1666 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$weakly excited. configuration=|p2f{-7/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} established in authors' ({+3}He,d),(|a,t) work 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
CONF$Weakly excited. configuration=|p1i{-13/2}|n3p{-1/2}{+-1} established in authors' ({+3}He,d),(|a,t) work 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T the 511|g from the 511 level is observed to have a long-lived component. The authors observe that the intensity of this component is consistent with the assumption that it results from the cascade decay of the 651 level via the 510 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
MOME2$from hfs measurements (2018Sc05) 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+208}Bi in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$atomic beam (1976Fu06), L(|a,t)=L({+3}He,d)=5 from 0+. 
T$from |a-decay in 2012Be06. 1.9E19 y {I2} from 2003De11 deduced only from the partial width for the ground state decay. 
$Octupole moment=+0.5 (1976Fu06) 
MOMM1$from 1996Ba94 re-evaluation with correction for diamagnetism of +4.1106 {I2} by NMR in 1953Ti01 
MOME2$from atomic beam method in 1983De07. Others: -0.37 {I3} (muonic x-ray hyperfine structure, 1972Le07), -0.40 {I5} (1974Ho40), -0.39 {I3} (optical spectroscopy, 1967Di04, 1970Ge10), -0.50 {I8} (pionic x-ray hyperfine structure, 1978Be24), -0.5 {I2} (pionic x-ray hyperfine structure). 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1} 
$|p{+0} emission not found (1989St01). Isotope shift({+207}Bi-{+209}Bi)=0.0999 cm{+-1} {I20} (1985Ba21). Charge density distribution measured (1973Si20,1978Eu01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(|a,t)=3, 896.28|g M1+E2 to 9/2- 
T$from B(E2)|^=0.00261 {I16} and the adopted mixing ratio of |d(896.28|g)=-0.62 {I6}. 
$B(E2)|^=0.00261 {I16}, weighted average of 0.0018 {I6} (1969He07), 0.0024 {I2} (1972Ha59), and 0.00275 {I14} (1973Kr02). Other: B(E2)|^=0.00139 {I+16-23} (1970Br12), but the bombarding energy was such that the assumption of a pure Coulomb excitation may not be valid (1973Kr02) 
$configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=L({+3}He,d)=6, 1608.53|g M2+E3 to 9/2- 
T$from B(E3)|^=0.026 {I3} and the adopted mixing ratio of |d(1608.53|g)=+0.33 {I10} 
$B(E3)|^=0.026 {I3}, weighted average of B(E3)|^=0.022 {I8} from Coulomb excitation (1969He07) and B(E3)|^=0.027 {I3} from (p,p') (1974Sc20). Other B(E3)|^=0.0124 {I32} (1970Br12), but see also the comment to the 896-keV level 
MOME2$from muonic x-ray hyperfine structure (1972Le07). 
CONF$probable a mixture of |p(1i{-13/2}){++1} and |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 
$Isomer shift measured in muonic atom: 3.7 {I+6-8} (1974Ba77), 3.5 {I6} (1972Le07), 3.8 {I3} (1984Ru08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(t,|a)=(0), 1546|g E3 to 7/2- 
T$from 1546.7|g(t) in (n,n|g) (1996De48). Other: 10 ns {I2} from ce(K)(896|g)(t)(1978El07) in (d,n|g). T{-1/2}>2 ps from 1546(t) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), but note that the authors place the 1546|g from the 3154-keV doublet. 
CONF$probable a mixture of |p(3s{-1/2}){+-1} and |p(2f{-7/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1972Ba81) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=2, L(p,p')=3. RUL rules out mult(49.94|g to 1/2+)=pure E2. 
T$from B(E3)|^=0.021 {I3} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) and the adopted branching for the 2492.86|g 
$B(E3)|^=0.021 {I3}, from 0.053 {I7} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-}+|p(2d{-3/2}){+-1} (1972Ba81) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3, 2564|g E1+E3 to 9/2- 
T$weighted average of 0.015 ps {I3}, from |G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=0.030 eV {I5} in (|g,|g') (1969Me21) for J=9/2, and 0.014 ps {I11}, from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). 
$B(E3)|^=0.073 {I11}, weighted average of B(E3)|^=0.074 {I11} from Coulomb excitation (1969He07) and 0.072 {I14} in muonic atom (1972Le07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$from muonic x-ray hyperfine structure in 1972Le07 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 
$Isomer shift=6.2 {I5} (1974Ba77), 5.8 {I5} (1972Le07), 6.6 {I3} (1984Ru08) in Muonic atom dataset. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=L(e,e')=3, 1686.66|g E1(+M2) to 7/2-, 2583.07|g E1+E3 to 9/2-. 
T$from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). Other: 0.15 ps {I+14-7} from DSAM in Coulomb excitation (1970Br12). 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 
$|b{-3}=0.122 {I6} from inelastic scattering (1967Al14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=6 for 2600 doublet, 2599.9|g E1+E3 to 9/2- 
T$from |G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=0.0090 eV {I24} in (|g,|g') (1969Me21) for J=11/2 and the adopted branching ratio of |G(|g{-0})/|G=0.847 {I18} 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1983Ma15) 
$B(E3)|^=0.094 {I14} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=6 for 2600 doublet, 992.35|g M1(+E2) to 13/2+, 140.13|g M1(+E2) from 15/2+. 
T$from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). Other: 0.24 ps {I+14-10} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1983Ma15) 
$B(E3)|^=0.108 {I15} from B(E3)=0.072 {I11} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3, 124.48|g M1(+E2) to 3/2+, and 1721.08|g E1(+M2) to 7/2- 
T$from adopted B(E3)|^=0.034 {I5}, by assuming a pure E3 transition for 2617.35|g. Other: >2 ps from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). 
$B(E3)|^=0.034 {I5} from B(E3)=0.057 {I9} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=1 from 9-, L(p,p')=3, 2741.03|g E3 to 9/2- 
T$from the adopted B(E3)|^=0.077 {I10} and branching ratios. Other: >2 ps from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). 
$B(E3)|^=0.077 {I10} from B(E3)=0.048 {I6}, weighted average of 0.048 {I7} in Coulomb excitation (1969He07) and 0.047 {I10} in Muonic atom (1972Le07). 
MOMM1,MOME2$From muonic x-ray hyperfine structure in 1972Le07 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 
$For isomer shift measurement see Muonic atom (1972Le07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 323.74|g M1 to 1/2+. Note, that L(p,p')=4 in 1975Wa03 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(|a,t)=3, 2826.0|g E2 to 9/2- 
T$from |G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=0.034 eV {I4} in (|g,|g') for J=5/2 and the adopted branching ratio of |G(|g{-0})/|G=0.718 {I16} Other: <14 fs from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) and 7.8 fs {I27} from B(E2)|^=0.029 {I10} in Coulomb excitation (1970Br12) 
$B(E2)|^=0.029 {I10} in Coulomb excitation (1970Br12) 
CONF$probable a mixture of |p(2f{-5/2}){++1} and |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
J$402.27|g(|q) is isotropic 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)+
level_comment:
J$149.98|g M1+E2 to 3/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3, 677.8|g from 1/2-. Spin was tentatively suggested by 1972Ba81, based on strength in (t,|a) and possible L=2 with configuration=|p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}. A |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} component is suggested by 1974Cl07 on the basis of (p,p') data, and by 1983Ma15 on the basis of (t,2n|g) data. Gammas to 1/2+ and 5/2+ are observed in (t,2n|g). The 2955|g to 9/2- is reported only in (n,n'|g). See comment on the 2955|g. 
$configuration=|p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}+|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1972Ba81) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=1 from 9-, L(p,p')=5 from 9/2-, 245.73|g E2 to 15/2+. 
T$weighted average of 17.9 ns {I5} from |g(t) in (n,n'|g) (1996De48), and 18 ns {I1} from |g(t) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). 
MOMM1$From g=0.368 {I8} in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) by time dependent perturbed angular distribution (1978Be17) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 2142.78|g E1 to 7/2- and 272.2|g (M1+E2) to 3/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 2194.1|g to 7/2- and 3089.48|g (E1+M2) to 9/2-. 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=1, 2223.23|g E2 to 7/2- 
T$from DSAM in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1972Ha59). 
$configuration=|p(3p{-3/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J$3132.96|g E1 to 9/2- and 1524.1|g to 13/2+. L(p,p')=5, but the peak is a probable doublet, based on |s and on the observation that the (p,p') excitation function appears to resonate at both the J|p=5- and 7- isobaric analog resonances. J|p=(13/2+) in (n,n'|g). 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 
$|b{-5}=0.067 {I4} from inelastic scattering (1967Al14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 394.72|g M1 to 15/2+ and 1527.13|g M1 to 13/2+. See also the 3133 level 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 3152.80|g E1 to 9/2- 
CONF$probable a mixture of |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-}} and |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-}} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 167.16|g M1 to 19/2+ and 413.04|g M1(+E2) to 15/2+, L(d,t)=1 from 9- 
CONF$probable a mixture of |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-}} and |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-}} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(+)
level_comment:
J$314.2|g (M1) to 1/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 1560.49|g M1 to 13/2+. J=(11/2+) from (n,n'|g) (1996De48) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-5{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 225.05|g (M1) to 19/2+, L(d,t)=1 from 9- 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1983Ma15). Note, that |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} is proposed in 1974Cl07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$455.02 (M1) to 3/2+ and |g(|q) is not consistent with a J to J transition; 131.45|g to 7/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=(3). 2414|g to 7/2- and 3310|g to 9/2- 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J$3378.11|g (E1) to 9/2- 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=6, 1797.64|g M1 to 13/2+; |g(|q) is consistent with J to J transition. Note, that J=(11/2+) in (n,n'|g) (1996De48) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$2553.4|g (E1) to 7/2- 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9- for E=3469, L(p,p')=5 for E=3466, 3464.09|g E1 to 9/2-; |g(|q) is not consistent with J to J transition. Note, that J=(9/2)+ in (n,n'|g) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_comment:
J$500.12|g (M1) to 19/2+ 
$probable configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(1i{-11/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+- \1}) (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2+)
level_comment:
J$290.38|g D to 17/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-1}){-4{+-} \} (1974Cl07,1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+:21/2+)
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5, 592.2|g D to 19/2+ 
$probable configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(1i{-11/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+- \1}) (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2+
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=5 and L(d,t)=1,3, 610.33|g M1 to 19/2+; |g(|q) in (t,2n|g) is consistent with J to J transition 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-2}{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
J$2705|g (E1) to 7/2- 
$probable configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1}~#3{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{+-} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(|a,t)=1, analyzing power fits in (pol {+7}Li,{+6}He). 
$configuration=|p(3p{-1/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$suggested by 1972Ba81 in (t,|a) on the basis of energy and strength as the h{-11/2} hole state, 3692.14|g to 9/2-. 
$configuration=|p(1h{-11/2}){+-1} (1972Ba81) 
$configuration: the authors of 1972Ba81 in (t,|a) also propose a small component with configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2(+)
level_comment:
E$two close levels at this energy are reported in (n,n'|g) (1996De48). However, no strong evidence supports two separate levels and the 664.8|g and 3703|g were placed from the same level in (t,2n|g) while assigned to the two separate levels in (n,n'|g). The evaluators treat them as the same level. 
J$664.8|g D to 5/2+ and 3703.4|g to 9/2-; |p=+ from probable configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1}~#3{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{+-}. See (n,n'|g) dataset for J|p comments for the two separate levels at this level energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2:21/2)+
level_comment:
E$from (p,p') 
J$L(d,t)=1,3 from 9- for 3735+3766. If L=3 for the 3766 component, as suggested by the observed g.s. transition from that level, then L=1 and thus J=15/2 to 21/2 for the 3735 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=1,3 from 9- for 3735+3766. J is limited to 11/2 if the 3767|g in (n,n'|g) can be assigned as a transition to the ground state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9- for E=3818, 825.45|g E2 to 19/2+ 
$probable configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}2f{-5/2}{+-1 \}) (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+,13/2+)
level_comment:
J$2209.3|g to 13/2+ and 1253|g to 9/2+. L(d,t)=3 from 9- for E=3818, if this corresponds in part to the 3817 level, would rule out J=9/2 and would require |p=+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)>6. J is limited to 13/2 (and thus L=7) if the 3937|g in (n,n'|g) can be assigned as a ground-state transition 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2,13/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2, 3980|g to 9/2- 
$g|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.82 {I8} 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$if the 4009|g is incorrectly assigned as a transition to the ground state, then the only evidence for a level at this energy is a (p,p') level at 4013 {I5}. This level might be the same as the (d,t) level at 4002 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_comment:
J$1648.5|g to 1/2+, |p=- from probable configuration 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} or |p(2f{-5/2}){++1} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2(+)
level_comment:
J$544.85|g and 654.98|g D to J=19/2; |p from probable configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1}~#3{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{+-} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=(2), J|p=13/2-, 15/2- for E=4174 {I25} from L(|a,t)=7. |g to 9/2- rules out the 15/2- alternative if the (|a,t) peak corresponds to the 4161 level 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=2 (1974Cl07), L(p,p')=3 (1975Wa03) 
$g|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.25 {I3} 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=7. J is limited to 13/2 if the 4233|g in (n,n'|g) can be interpreted as a ground-state transition corresponding to the (|a,t) level; otherwise, J|p=13/2-,15/2- for E=4247 {I25} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J$1295.9|g to 3/2- and 1922.4|g to 3/2+, L({+3}He,d)=(1), p{-1/2} state suggested in (p,|g) and in ({+3}He,d), L(|a,t)=1+3 for E=4459 {I25} 
$configuration=|p(3p{-1/2}){++1} (1970El13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
$configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1} (1970El13) 
J$L(p,p')=4, L({+3}He,d)=(2,3), L(|a,t)=1+3 for E=4459 {I25}. 4439.1|g to 9/2-. Possible f{-7/2} state suggested in ({+3}He,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,d). L({+3}He,d)=low suggests that this level is distinct from that at 4515 or at 4532 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$one or both of the transitions with energy 4691.5 {I3} and 4702.3 {I4} reported in (n,n'|g) could be ground-state transitions corresponding to the peak at 4700 seen in (|a,t) and (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2,11/2)
level_comment:
J$4796.0|g (D) to 9/2-, L(|a,t)=6 for E=4795 {I25}. See also 4789.8 level 
$g|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=2.9 {I5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=7, J is limited to 13/2 if the 4996|g in (n,n'|g) can be interpreted as a ground-state transition corresponding to the (|a,t) level; otherwise, J|p=13/2-,15/2- for E=4998 {I25} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9-, J is then limited to 11/2 if the 5057|g in (n,n'|g) can be interpreted as a ground-state transition corresponding to the (d,t) level; otherwise J|p=11/2+ to 25/2+ for E=5058 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
E$one or both of the transitions with energy 5074.9 and 5096.6 reported in (n,n'|g) could be ground-state transitions corresponding to the peak at 5087 seen in (|a,t) 
J$L(|a,t)=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_comment:
E$one or both of the transitions with energy 5361.6 {I12} and 5371.9 {I7} reported in (n,n'|g) could be ground-state transitions corresponding to the peak at 5367 seen in (d,t) 
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-,15/2-
level_comment:
E$several transitions in (n,n'|g) could correspond to ground-state transitions from the peak at 5380 {I25} reported in (|a,t) 
J$L(|a,t)=7 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9-, J is limited to 11/2 if the 5404.5|g in (n,n'|g) can be interpreted as a ground-state transition corresponding to the (d,t) level; otherwise J|p=11/2+ to 25/2+ for E=5402 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,t)=6 for E=5469 {I25}, L(d,t)=3 for E=5464 {I10}. 5464.5|g to 9/2- 
T$deduced by evaluators from g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=1.4 eV {I4} in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+,11/2,13/2-)
level_comment:
E$unresolved multiplet in (|g,|g') with g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=6.8 {I12} 
J$3902|g to 13/2+ and 5510.4|g to 9/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2,11/2)
level_comment:
E$unresolved multiplet in (|g,|g') with g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=4.4 {I10} 
J$4641.8|g to 7/2- and 5538.4|g to 9/2-; excitation in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2,11/2)
level_comment:
E$5554 {I2} is reported in (|g,|g'). The evaluator assumes that this is the same level as that reported in (n,n'|g) 
J$4663|g to 7/2- and 5559.8|g to 9/2-; excitation in (|g,|g') 
$g|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=2.6 {I8} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$5570.5|g to 9/2-, L(|a,t)=6 for E=5580 {I25} 
T$deduced by evaluators from g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=1.7 eV 10 in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$5589.1|g to 9/2-, L(|a,t)=6 for E=5580 {I25} 
T$deduced by evaluators from g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=3.2 eV {I9} in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$5609|g M1 to 9/2- and |g(|q), |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$deduced by evaluators from |G=0.95 eV {I20} in (|g,|g') (1974Te01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9-, J is limited to 11/2 if the 5652.5|g in (n,n'|g) can be interpreted as a ground-state transition corresponding to the (d,t) level; otherwise, J|p=11/2+ to 25/2+ for E=5657 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3 from 9-. J is limited to 11/2 if the 5925.1|g in (n,n'|g) can be interpreted as a ground-state transition corresponding to the (d,t) level; otherwise J|p=11/2+ to 25/2+ for E=5924 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$7168|g E1 to 9/2- and |g(|q), |g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$deduced by evaluators from |G=0.82 eV {I4} in (|g,|g') (1972Wo21). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from 7416|g(|q) (D) to 9/2- and |g,|g(pol) in (|g,|g') 
T$deduced by evaluators from |G=0.24 eV {I+38-17} in (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from L(|g,n)=0 to 5+ and 4+; 7632|g(|q) (D) to 9/2- 
T$deduced by evaluators from |G>0.5 eV in (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,WIDTH$from (|a,|a') giant resonance. Others: E=10.9 MeV, |G=2.7 MeV from (e,n) giant resonance; E=10.7 MeV, |G=2.2 MeV from (p,p') giant resonance. 
$%EWSR(E2)=50 {I30} from (e,n); 90-150 for L=2, or 50-150 for L=2 with 20-40% for L=4 from (|a,|a') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,WIDTH$from (e,n) giant resonance. Other: (|g,|g'), (|a,|a'): giant resonance 
$%EWSR=80-120 for L=0 and 30-50 for L=2 with the maximum contribution from L=4 giving %EWSR=15-30 ((|a,|a'): giant resonance) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$reported values are 20.2 MeV with |G=6 MeV in (e,n), |?20 MeV with |G=8 MeV in (e,e'), and |?23 MeV with |G|?3.5 MeV in (p,|g) giant resonance 
$%EWSR(E2)=200 {I90} determined in (e,n). E2 or E0 excitation suggested in (e,e'), but observation in (p,|g) rules out E0. Possible isovector E2 giant resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_comment:
$Isomer shift=6.7 {I5} (1974Ba77), 6.2 {I5} (1972Le07), 6.29 {I18} (1984Ru08) 
BE3$Authors' value of 0.075 {I16} has been corrected by the evaluator for additional branching of the 2741 level via the 141|g (I(|g+ce)=29.1% {I9} from Adopted Gammas) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$BE3|^=0.067 {I5} (1968Zi02), |b{-3}=0.14 {I2} (1964Ro05), |b{-3}=0.12 {I2} (1966Cr03), |b{-3}=0.16 {I5} (1961Cr01), |b{-3}R=0.76 {I8} (1966Al07), 0.71 {I5} (1988Ch10), 0.70 {I3} (1991Si04) 
$BE3=0.67 5 (1968Zi02) could be a typo 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$From 1988Ch10 and 1991Si04. 
L$from 1991Si04 and 1961Cr01. 
$|b{-4}R=0.20 {I7}, |b{-2}R=0.31 {I3} (1988Ch10); |b{-4}R=0.46 {I3}, |b{-2}R=0.37 {I3} (1991Si04), |b{-4}=0.17 {I6} (1961Cr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
$Based on a comparison with a collective E0 or E2 resonance observed at |?22 MeV in {+208}Pb(e,e'), the authors suggest that the observed resonance at 23 MeV is a collective E2 excitation. Observation in (p,|g) rules out E0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$|g-branching ratio to 3/2+ and 5/2+ members of the configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} septuplet agrees with the calculated value for assignment as a 3/2+ component (fragmented) of the same multiplet (1983Ma15) 
$configuration=|p(2d{-3/2}){+-1}+|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1983Ma15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+,11/2+)
level_comment:
$the authors' value of 3719.6 {I4} is assumed by the evaluator to be a misprint since the only transition from (or to) this level is a g.s. transition with E|g=3719 {I2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 19/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E,J$from 1978Be17 
T$weighted average of values from 245|g(t), 1133|g(t), 2741|g(t), 992|g(t) and 1608|g(t) (1978Be17) 
G$from |g(|q,H,t) (1978Be17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|p(1j{-15/2}){++1} as suggested by 1985Ga01 in (|a,t). Peak is probable multiplet consisting of the 4174, 4247, and 4543 levels reported in (|a,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|p(1j{-15/2}){++1} as suggested by 1985Ga01 in (|a,t). Peak is probable doublet consisting of 4886 and 4998 levels reported in (|a,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$for configuration=|p(1j{-15/2}){++1}. Peak is probable multiplet consisting of 5277 and 5380 (configuration=|p(1j{-15/2}){++1}) and 5469 and 5580 (configuration=|p(1i{-11/2}){++1}), with configurations as suggested by 1985Ga01 in (|a,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=2.2 {I6} 
S$g|G(|g{-0}){+2}/|G=12 {I6} for E=5293 keV {I5} (1977Co10). This probably includes the 5281-keV and 5293-keV levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$|G(|g{-0})/|G=1.0; |G(|g{-0})=0.82 eV {I4} (1972Wo21). Others: 1967Gi15, 1969Be71; |e<2 eV (1967Gi15), 4.5 eV {I17} (1969Be71), 5.8 eV {I8} (1972Wo21, as quoted by 1974Wo05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$x|?200 eV based on |e(7279 level)|?196 eV, deduced from an absorption spectrum, and |e(7279+x)|?20 eV, deduced from a scattering experiment |e|?20 eV (1977Ja13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2)
level_comment:
J$from 1969Ra09 based on |g(|q). 
$|G(|g{-0})/|G=0.65 {I30} (1973Ak04), 0.6 {I2} (1969Ra09), weighted average=0.62 {I23}; |G(|g{-0})=0.14 eV {I9} (1969Ra09), 0.16 eV {I11} (1973Ak04), weighted average=0.15 eV {I9}; |e=3.4 eV {I16} (1969Ra09), 4.5 eV {I12} (1973Ak04), weighted average=4.1 eV {I12} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2)
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) and |g(pol) in 1974Wo05. 
$|G(|g{-0})>0.03 eV; |G>0.5 eV (1974Wo05); g|G{-|g0}=0.092 eV {I12} (1977Ja13); |e=404 eV (1977Ja13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$|G=40 eV {I+40-20}, |G{-0}=0.44 eV {I+40-20} (1991Mo25). 
$1991Mo25 observed two neutron groups at E{-n}=177 and 114 keV, with |s=275 mb {I40} and 93 mb {I14}, respectively. 
J$l{-n}=0 transitions to 5+ and 4+ states in {+208}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L$4+6 from 1974Sc20. |s(|q) could not be fit with the collective model assuming L=2 transfer. |b{-4}=0.0125, |b{-6}=0.0134 (1974Sc20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
S$from 1974Sc20, 0.027 from 1975Wa03. Others: |?0.024 (1971Be32), 0.022 (1970Be15) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2492 1 (1975Wa03), 2489 3 (1966Ha35), 2492 4 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2564 1 (1975Wa03), 2560 3 (1966Ha35), 2563 4 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2581 2 (1975Wa03), 2580 3 (1966Ha35), 2582 4 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2599 1 (1975Wa03), 2597 3 (1966Ha35), 2600 4 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2617 2 (1975Wa03), 2615 3 (1966Ha35), 2616 4 (1974Cl07) 
S$Others: 0.11 {I1} (1971Be32) and 0.099 {I5} (1974Sc20) for a level at E=2650 {I30}. 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2766 2 (1975Wa03), 2766 4 (1974Cl07) 
L$L=4 (1975Wa03), L=5 (1974Cl07) 
S$0.013 for L=4 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2956 3 (1975Wa03), 2957 4 (1974Cl07) 
L$L=(4) (1975Wa03), L=3 (1974Cl07) 
S$0.014 for L=4 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$2986 1 (1975Wa03), 2987 4 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-2}{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$Probable doublet, based on |s and on the observation that the excitation function appears to resonate at both the J|p=8-,9- and J|p=4-,5- isobaric analog resonances. 1974Cl07 report 3154 {I4}. 
S$0.050 {I5} from 1971Be32 for a level at E=3150 {I30}. 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#4{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$3211 1 (1975Wa03), 3212 4 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#4{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3597 {I4} (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-2}{+-} or |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#5{-1}{+-} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$3981 3 (1975Wa03), 3983 5 (1974Cl07) 
S$0.049 {I7} from 1971Be32 for a level at E=3960 {I50}. 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$4092 4 (1975Wa03), 4093 7 (1974Cl07) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} or |p(2f{-5/2}){++1} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$4210 4 (1975Wa03), 4213 7 (1974Cl07) 
L$L=2 (1974Cl07), L=3 (1975Wa03) 
S$0.029 for L=3 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#2{++} (1974Cl07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$4286 3 (1975Wa03), 4288 7 (1974Cl07) 
L,S$L=4+6 from 1971Be32, |b{-4}=0.071 {I7}, |b{-6}=0.071 {I7} for a level at E=4290 {I50}. The equality of |b{-4},|b{-6} is an assumption made by 1971Be32 in the analysis of their data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|G=2.0 MeV {I4}, %EWSR=80-120 (L=0), 30-50 (L=2), with maximum contribution from L=4 giving %EWSR=15-30 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$weighted average of 0.0018 {I6} (1969He07), 0.0024 {I2} (1972Ha59), and 0.00275 {I14} (1973Kr02). Other: 0.00139 {I+16-23} (1970Br12), but the bombarding energy was such that the assumption of pure Coulomb excitation may not be valid (1973Kr02) 
$configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
BE3$other: 0.0124 {I32} in 1970Br12, but see also the comment to the 896-keV level 
$configuration=|p(1i{-13/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$from 1970Br12 only. This value is 4 keV lower than the adopted one. 
$configuration=|p(2f{-5/2}){++1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$The authors of 1972Ba81 noted that the relative maximum of the transition to this level at 40|' is consistent with L=0. 
S$if J|p=1/2+ 
$configuration=|p(3s{-1/2}){+-1}+|p(2f{-7/2}){++1}~#3{+-} (1972Ba81) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$E=2.6 MeV, |G=0.8 MeV (1993Yo01) 
S$if configuration=|p(2f{-5/2}){++1}, 0.75 {i4} from 1998Mo02 for unresolved 2826+3120 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$doublet from 1998Mo02 
S$0.49 {i10} for the component with configuration=|p(3p{-1/2}){++1}, 0.10 {i9} for the component with configuration=|p(2f{-7/2}){++1} (1998Mo02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$using centroid-shift analysis of time-differential spectra produced by summing gates on the 992|g and 1132|g above the 13/2+ level and 1609|g below it, detected using LaBr{-3}(Ce) detectors. A value of 0.130 ns {I10} was obtained using convolution between a single exponential decay and Gaussian prompt response function. 
CONF$a mixture of |p(1i{-13/2}){++1} and |p(1h{-9/2}){++1}~#3{+-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from a time-differential spectrum produced by summing gates on the 324|g and 402|g above the 1/2+ level and 1547|g and 896|g below it, detected using LaBr{-3}(Ce) detectors 
$configuration=|p(3s{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$from frequency ratio to proton |n({+209}Bi)/|n(H)=0.1607167 {I2}(stat) from NMR measurements with the BiF{+-}{-6} solution and calculated shielding constant |s(BiF{+-}{-6})=12792, with uncertainty dominated by theory (2018Sk03). |n({+209}Bi)/|n(H)=0.160699 {I1}(stat), with Bi(NO{-3}){-3} solutions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
MOME2$derived value using electric field gradients calculated in 2013Qu04 using relativistic Dirac-Coulomb calculations and experimental nuclear quadrupole coupling constants from S.A. Cooke et al., J. Mol. Struct. 695-696, 13 (2004). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 5.013 d {I5} (1956Ro18,1959Ro51), 5.02 d {I1} (1935Po01), 5.02 d {I2} (1952Be22), and 4.989 d {I13} (1953Lo09). 
J J=1, atomic beam (1976Fu06). |p=-, L=4 in (d,p). 
%|a: from 1962Ka27. 
MOMM1,MOME2$atomic beam (1962Al02,1989Ra17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T |b|g(t) (1955Le29). 
J 46.5|g M1 to 1-. Analogy with J|p=0- level in {+212}Bi. 
E from {+210}Pb |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
MOMM1,MOME2$Laser spectroscopy in resonance cells with fluorescence detection. Isotope shift (1997Ki15,2000Pe30). 
T specific activity measurement (1976TuZY). Other values: 3.55|*10{+6} y {I12} specific activity measurement (1969La01), 2.6|*10{+6} y {I8} (1953Hu42). 
J L=(9) in (|a,d), J(max)=9. 
%|b{+-}<3|*10{+-5}, %IT<3|*10{+-5} (|b{+-} or IT decay not observed) (1976TuZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 56.8 ns {I10} (1972Ba65) and 59.0 ns {I15} (1973Pr11). Other: 58 ns (1998Pf02). 
MOMM1$differential perturbed angular correlations of |g rays (DPAD) (1972Ba65,1989Ra17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 1973Pr11. Others: 37.0 ns {I14} (1972Ba65) and 38 ns {I6} (1971El01). 
MOMM1$differential perturbed angular correlations of |g rays (1972Ba65,1989Ra17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E from {+209}Bi(d,p|g). 
J L=6 in (d,p); L=11 in (|a,d), J(max)=10. 
T recoil-distance Doppler measurement (1975Do12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X+5996;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E,T$Exact location of this isomer could not be determined. One possibility, as mentioned in 2014Ci03, was missing the low-energy transitions in the deexcitation cascades due to high internal conversion and low detection efficiency. However, 2014Ci03 note the location of this isomer to be above 6000 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$|s(|mb/sr)=38 
J|p=10- (J(max)=10-). 
L=11 analogs: {+208}Bi,{+206}Bi at 2.81,2.86 MeV, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$|s(|mb/sr)=260 
J(max)=8- 
L=7 analogs: {+208}Bi,{+206}Bi at 3096,3170 keV, respectively 
Configuration=((|p 2f{-7/2})(|n 2g{-9/2})) is dominant; see (pol d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb/sr)=318 
J|p=11+ (J(max)=11+), configuration=((|p 1i{-13/2})(|n 2g{-9/2})) (1988La18,1981Da07). 
L=10 analogs: {+208}Bi,{+206}Bi at 3508,3568 keV, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb/sr)=134 
Doublet of 2733,2736 states 
J|p=14- (J(max)=14-), configuration=((|p 1i{-13/2})(|n 1j{-15/2})). (1988La18,1981Da07). 
L=13 analogs: {+208}Bi,{+206}Bi at 4848,4843 keV, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_comment:
E from 1972Cl05. Other: 1469 {I3} (|a,d) 
C{+2}S' for L=7, other values: 2.5 for L=7 and 2.5 theory 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
E from 1962Er02, 1972Cl05. Other: 2143 {I3} (1972Ko03) 
L,S Admixed with L=0 transfer of |?0.04 strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
C{+2}S'=0.7 theory 
L,S 3-, L=4 (d,p) strength is split between 2762,3035 states. Admixed with L=2 transfer of |?0.16 strength. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
C{+2}S'=1.3 theory 
L,S 6-, L=2 (d,p) strength is split between 2839,3102 states. Admixed with L=4 transfer of |?0.53 strength. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_comment:
C{+2}S'=1.3 theory 
L,S 6-, L=4 (d,p) strength is split between 2839,3102 states Admixed with L=2 transfer of 0.37 strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 320|g(t) pulsed beam (1973Pr11). Other value: 38 ns {I6} (1971El01). 
Branching: I(|g+ce)(5.8|g)/I(|g+ce)(91|g)=0.17 predicted (1973Pr11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(776|g)/I|g(770|g)=1.00 {I15} (1973Ca11) does not agree with |g-Branching to 3-,4-,5- states in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(339|g)/I|g(1361|g)/I|g(1577|g)/I|g(1605|g)/I|g (1925|g)=54 {I15}/64 {I16}/54 {I24}/100/48 {I13} (1973Pr11), 7 {I4}/34 {I7}/--/100/29 {I6} (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(1065|g)/I|g(1398|g)/I|g(1430|g)/I|g(1547|g)/I |g(1709|g)=29 {I2}/44 {I2}/53 {I2}/16 {I2}/100 (1973Pr11), 30 {I6}/51 {I6}/49 {I6}/40 {I6}/100 (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(1484|g)/I|g(1531|g)/I|g(1595|g)/I|g(1600|g)/I |g(1686|g)=100/|< 35/40 {I4}/38 {I5}/21 {I2} (1973Pr11), 100/55 {I13}/55 {I13}/--/-- (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J 3- (1973Ca11), 4- (1973Pr11). Other: 4- via (d,p) 
Branching: I|g(495|g)/I|g(832|g)/I|g(1733|g)/I|g(1761|g)=<500 /--/100/87 {I17} (1973Pr11), 60 {I12}/40 {I13}/100/74 {I15} (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(1526|g)/I|g(1558|g)/I|g(1669|g)/I|g(1675|g)=27 {I2}/28 {I2}/100/47 {I5} (1973Pr11), 35 {I6}/23 {I5}/100/-- (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(2022|g)/I|g(2086|g)/I|g(2177|g)=100/41 {I2}/38 {I5} (1973Pr11), 100/48 {I8}/52 {I8} (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(2029|g)/I|g(2076|g)/I|g(2140|g)=100/17 {I1}/5.1 {I4} (1973Pr11), 100/15 {I3}/4 {I2} (1973Ca11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
Configuration=(({+210}Pb 0+)(|p h{-9/2})). 
J L=0 from (t,p) on 9/2- target. 
T$weighted average of 2.22 min 6 (1970Mu21) and 2.13 min 2 (1965Nu03). 
%B-,%A from measured I|a({+211}Po)/(I|a({+211}Bi)+I|a({+211}Po)); weighted average of 0.274 {I4} (1967Da10), 0.274 {I10} (1965Nu03), 0.29 {I1} (1962Gi04). 
MOMM1$from 6623|a temperature anisotropy (2007St23, original reference D.A. Williams et al., Proc. Conf. on Hyperfine Interactions 1C, p565 (1996), Leuven). Other: 3.5 {I3} from static (low-temperature) nuclear orientation (1992Sc26). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J from |g|g(|q), |g|g(pol) and ce data ({+211}Pb |b{+-} decay). 
T weighted average of 0.318 ns {I14} (1966Go19) and 0.315 ns {I20} (1963Va05) ({+211}Pb |b{+-} decay). 
MOMM1 from |g|g(|q,H) ({+211}Pb |b{+-} decay). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J |g|g(|q) establishes J=9/2 ({+211}Pb |b{+-} decay); M1+E2 427|g to 7/2- level. 
T from |b|g(t) (1963Va05) in |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J 5/2-,7/2-,9/2- from M1+E2 705|g to 7/2- 405 level; |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay rules out J=7/2; log| {Ift}=5.6 from 9/2+ {+211}Pb rules out J=5/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2)-
level_comment:
J M1 322|g to (13/2)- 828 level; |g|g data indicates 19.9 keV |g to (17/2)- 1130 level; shell-model calculation ({+209}Bi(t,p)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J from T{-1/2} and shell model ({+209}Bi(t,p|g)). 
T from |g(t) and p|g(t) ({+209}Bi(t,p|g), 1989Ma12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E from (d,p). 
T From 1998Pf02 in ({+238}U,X|g). 
J from S value and shell-model calculation. J|p=(29/2-) is possible. Possible configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 1g{-9/2}){++2}) for J|p=25/2-, and configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 1g{-9/2})(|n 1i{-11/2})) for J|p=29/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J |g|g(|q), |g|g(pol) establish J=7/2 (1968Da07,1968Go15) 
T weighted average of 0.318 ns {I14} (|g|g(t) 1966Go19) and 0.315 ns {I20} (|b|g(t) 1963Va05). 
G from |g|g(|q,h) (liquid source, H=18.3 kG and T{-1/2}=0.317 ns {I11}, 1965Ag03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
S strength relative to the {+206}Pb(|a,p){+209}Bi g.s. transition. 
Configuration: [|p h{-9/2} ~# {+210}Pb(0+)]9/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
L based on known spin. 
S strength relative to the {+206}Pb(|a,p){+209}Bi transition to the 897 f7/2 level. 
Dominant configuration=(({+210}Pb 0+)(|p 2f{-7/2})). 52% {I10} of the |p f7/2 strength is in the 410-keV level, based on the measured strength and the assumption that configurations, other than the one indicated, are not excited. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L contribution from other L transfers is |<5%. 
S large relative strength indicates configuration=((|p h{-9/2})({+210}Pb 0+))9/2-. 
d|s/d|W(30|')=61.0 |mb/sr. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E probably a doublet (because of its large strength) containing two of the 2+ multiplet members. 
d|s/d|W(30|')=45.0 |mb/sr. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from |g(t) with 301.7, 766.5 and 828.1 |g rays. Other: 60 ns {I20} from p-ce(t) for 97.4 keV transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E From Adopted Levels. 
J From T{-1/2} and assumption of deexcitation to the (21/2-) level. However, an alternative assignment of (29/2-) cannot be excluded (1998Pf02). 
T from implant-|g(t) (1998Pf02). 
Probable configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 1g{-9/2}){++2}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E rounded value from Adopted Levels; level not seen by 1978Ha31 and not expected to be populated via g{-9/2} neutron transfer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E possibly an unresolved doublet with J|p=9/2- (seen also in {+211}Pb |b{+-} decay) and J|p=13/2-; supported by authors' shell-model analysis of S. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,T From Adopted Levels. 
J J|p=(29/2-) is possible also. 
Possible configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 1g{-9/2}){++2}) if J|p=25/2-, or configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|n 1g{-9/2})(|n 1i{-11/2})) if J|p=29/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (41/2+)
level_comment:
J Probable configuration=((|p 1i{-13/2})(|n 1j{-15/2}){+2+}). Fragmentation of decay scheme above this level suggests that it corresponds to maximum value from coupling the three valence nucleons. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
MOMM1$from fit to hfs spectra (2018Ba03). Hyperfine structure anomaly is neglected as it is expected to be on the order of 10{+-3} to 10{+-4}. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209,211}=0.221 fm{+2} {I6} (stat) {I15} (syst) (2018Ba03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1$from laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy (1997Ki15). Other: 0.41 {I5} from static low-temperature nuclear orientation (1997Ki15). 
MOME2$from laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy (1997Ki15,2000Pe30,2001Bi23,2016St14). 
$Isotope shifts: 1997Ki15, 2000Pe30. 
J$log| {Ift} from 0+ suggests J=0 or 1; |a|g(|q) rules out J=0 (1986Ma17); |p=- from shell model. 
T$weighted average of 60.480 min {I52} (1914Le01) and 60.600 min {I43} (1961Ap03). Other: 60.5 min (1949Me54,1948Gh01). 
%A$weighted average of 36.00 {I3} (1965Wa09), 35.81 {I4} (1962Be09), and 35.96 {I6} (1960Sc07). 
$configuration=(|p1h{-9/2})(|n2g{-9/2}) 
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.5489 fm {I54} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J=2 from |g|g(|q) in {+212}Pb |b{+-} decay, M1 115.2|g to 1(-) g.s. 
T$from (ce)(ce)(t) in {+212}Pb |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$M1(+E2) 97.9|g to 2(-), large HF=339 for alpha decay from {+216}At(J|p=1-) suggests L=2 |a transition, favoring J|p=3-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$M1 238.6|g to 1(-), isotropic |b|g(|q) in {+212}Pb |b{+-} decay favors J=0 
T$from |b|g(t) in {+212}Pb |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-,9-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$from Schottky mass spectrometry (2013Ch12). Other: 250 from E|a=6.34 MeV to {+208}Tl g.s. (1978Ba44) 
J$J|p=(9-) suggested by analogy with {+210}Bi. Possible configuration=(({+210}Bi 9-)(|n2g{-9/2}){++2}0+) (1978Ba44). J|p=(8-) suggested by log ft value for |b{+-} decay to J|p=8+ state in {+212}Po (1991Wa18). 
T$from 1984Es01. Others: 28 min {I1} (1980Le27), 25 min {I1} (1978Ba44) 
%A,%B-$from I|a(25 min {+212}Bi)/I|a({+212}Po) (1984Es01), see {+212}Bi |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) data set 
%B-A$from I|a({+212}Po excited states) (see {+212}Bi |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) data set). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J$J|p=(2-,3-,4-) from 37.6|g M1 to (3-). Absence of |g-ray decay to 115-keV level (J|p=2(-)) and ground state (J|p=1(-)) suggests J|p=(4-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$M1 176.7|g to 0(-), 300.1|g to 2(-), absence of |g-ray to (3-) 
T$from |b(ce)(t) in {+212}Pb |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (18-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E$from Schottky mass spectrometry (2013Ch12) 
J$from |b{+-} decay to (18+) level in {+212}Po, comparison to shell model calculations (2013Ch12, 1991Wa18) 
T$neutron atom half-life from 1984Es01. Others: 7 min {I1} (1980Le27), 9 min {I1} (1978Ba44). For highly-charged atoms (charge states of 80+,81+, and 82+), T{-1/2} > 30 min (2013Ch12) 
%IT,%B-$only a |b{+-} delayed 11.65 MeV |a (from 45.1 s {+212}Po) with T{-1/2}=7.0 m has been observed. Taking log| {Ift} for this transition as 5.1 (lower limit for allowed |b{+-} transition) and E{-level}=1478 keV, the %IT branch must be >75%, as deduced by the evaluators. 
$Produced by {+204}Hg({+18}O,{+10}B), {+205}Tl({+18}O,{+11}C), {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+14}N) with E({+18}O)=99-195 MeV (1984Es01) and {+9}Be({+238}U,X) with E({+238}U)=750 MeV/nucleon (2013Ch12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(250<E|b<350)(238.632|g)(|q) isotropic favors J=0 (1969Sc06) 
T$from |b|g(t) (1963Li08). Other: |<5 ps (|b(ce)(t) 1971Va24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$from |b(ce)(t) (1971Va24) 
J$(300.087|g)(115.183|g)(|q) agrees only with 1(D)2(D)1 sequence if J(0.0 level)=1 and both 115.183|g and 300.087|g are D (1960Ro16,1961Gi02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$Isotope shift: |d<r{+2}>({+213}Bi, {+209}Bi)=0.422 fm{+2} {I29} (2018Ba03). Other: 0.416 fm{+2} {I1} (2013An02). 
J$Based on favored |a decay of {+217}At(J{+|p})=9/2- |) to {+213}Bi g.s.. J|p({+217}At)=9/2- based on {+221}Fr(J{+|p})=5/2- |a decay |) 218 level (J{+|p})=5/2- and |) E2 |g to g.s. of {+217}At (1972Dz14, 1977Vy02). Also supported by the HFS and |m measurements (2019Ba22). 
T Weighted average of 45.59 min {I6} (1973Po16), 47 min {I1} (1950Ha52), 46 min {I1} (1964Gr11), 45.636 min {I220} and 45.598 min {I91} from Cherenkov counting and |g(t), respectively (2021Ta01), 45.62 min {I6} (2013Su13, 2013Ma13 - from beta decay curve). Others: 46 min (1947En03). 
%|a=2.140 {I10} from 2013Ma13 and %|b{+-} = 100 - %|a. Others: %|a=2.09 {I3} (1998Ar03), %|a=2.20 {I3} (1997Ch53), %|a=2.16 {I11} (1964Gr11), %|a=2.0 (1950Ha52), %|a=2 (1947En03), and %|a=2.022 {I26} (1986He06 based on 465|g of {+209}Tl). Weighted average of all values, with uncertainty, excluding the 1986He06 value yields %|a=2.140 {I14}. 
MOMM1 From 2019StZV (based on +3.716 {I7} in 1997Ki15, 2000Pe30, 2000Bi23 (laser spectroscopy)). Others: +3.89 {I9} (1992Li25 - from |g(|q,t)), the value 3.672 {I7} in 2018Ba03 appears to be quoted from 1992Li25 as of Fig. 7, however the reason of the difference is not clear. 
MOME2 From 2016St14, 2001Bi23 (reference value -0.516 {I15} {+209}Bi). Others: -0.60 {I5} (1997Ki15, 2000Pe30 - reference value -0.370 {I26} ({+209}Bi)). -0.68 {I5} (2018Ba03 - not clear if it is their measured value or not). 
Configuration: |p (h{-9/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$ Isomer ({+238}U,X) was identified from Schottky frequency spectrum (figure 2 in 2012Ch19). Excitation energy was deduced from Schottky frequency spectrum (figure 2 in 2012Ch19), mass measurement. 2012Ch19 mention |g decay to the ground-state was discovered in the time resolved spectrum shown in Fig. 2. 
T$ > 168 s from single-ion tracing evaluation method (2008ChZI). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
MOMM1$from fit to hfs spectra (2018Ba03). Hyperfine structure anomaly is neglected as it is expected to be on the order of 10{+-3} to 10{+-4}. 
$|d<r{+2}>{+209,213}=0.422 fm{+2} {I1} (stat) {I29} (syst) (2018Ba03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from 1991Ma68; others: 19.9 min {I4} (1956Da06), 19.7 min adopted in 1931Cu01. 
%A$from 1960Wa14; other: 0.04% adopted in 1931Cu01. 
J$log| {Ift}=7.872 {I11} of |b{+-} to 0+ and log| {Ift}=9.05 {I6} to 2+ of {+214}Po and |b{+-} from 0+ of {+214}Pb with log| {Ift}=6.26 {I4} consistent with J=1; M1+E2 |g from 2-. Most possible configuration=((|p h{-9/2})(|n g{-9/2})). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$E1 |g from 1+; no observed |b feeding from 0+ excluding 0- assignments. 
T$from |g|g(t) fast timing (2011ReZZ). Others: |< 0.1 ns (1991Be06), 0.52 ns {I5} (1984Pe13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-,3-)
level_comment:
J$196.20|g from (2-) state; favored 6693|a from {+218}At g.s. which is suggested to be (2,3) from hfs (2019Ba22) and |a decay (2019Cu02) measurements. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-)
level_comment:
E$deduced from E|a=6654 {I4} to this level and E|a=6693 {I3} to 62.68-keV level. 
J$unfavored 6654|a from {+218}At g.s., which is suggested to be (2,3) from hfs (2019Ba22) and |a decay (2019Cu02) measurements. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 1-; M1(+E2) |g to 2-; log {Ift}=5.250 {I24} from 0+. 
T$from |g|g(t) gated on 242|g (1991Be06). Other: |<0.10 ns from |b|g(t) (1984Pe13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E,T$measured in Storage Ring at GSI using FRS and Schottky Mass Spectrometry with single-ion tracing method (2008ChZI). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$|g|g(t) fast timing with LaBr{-3}(Ce) (2011ReZZ); Other: <0.1 ns from |b|g|g(t) (1991Be06); 0.52 ns {I15} from |b|g|g(t) (1984Pe13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4-)
level_comment:
E$deduced from E|a=6654 {I4} to this level and E|a=6693 {I3} to 62.68-keV level. 
J$unfavored 6654|a from {+218}At g.s., which is suggested to be (3-) from hfs (2019Ba22) and |a decay (2019Cu02) measurements. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$ RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.576 fm {I9}; deduced from extrapolation of evaluated rms charge radii of {+209}Bi to {+213}Bi (2013An02), with slope k{-z}=0.35 in formula 9 of 2004An14 
%B-$ only |b{+-} decay mode observed (1990Ru02,1953Hy83). %|a|?8.|*10{+-5} from systematics of |a branching versus Q(|a) for {+212}Bi, {+213}Bi, and {+214}Bi. 
J$analogy to {+209}Bi, {+211}Bi, and {+213}Bi suggests |ph{-9/2} configuration. Strong |b feeding of 293, (11/2+) level in {+215}Po corroborates this configuration assignment. 
T$weighted average of 7.7 min {I2} (1990Ru02), 7.5 min {I4} (1989Bu09), and 7.4 min {I6} (1965Nu03). Other value: 8 min {I2} (1953Hy83). 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.552 fm {I3} (extrapolation from {+209}Bi value using formula (4) in 2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$ M1 |g to (9/2-); analogy to {+211}Bi, {+213}Bi, suggests |ph{-7/2} configuration. Large HF for |a decay parent nuclei to a corresponding 7/2- state observed in {+211}Bi and {+213}Bi corroborates this configuration assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2:29/2)(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%B-$deduced by the evaluators from weighted average of gamma transition intensities for five strong |g rays in 2003Ku26. Value of %|b{+-}=23.8 {I4} in 2003Ku26 is slightly different but could not be reproduced by the evaluators. 
E$ x=40 {I+80-40} (2003Ku26, from non-observation of Bi K-x rays in coin with 186.8|g). Other estimate: 20 {I20} (2012Au07) 
T$ from weighted average (2003Ku26) of 37.1 s {I5} and 36.4 s {I8} from the decay curves of 187, 414, 747 |g rays in isomer decay and 226, 256, 308, 419 |g rays in |b{+-} decay, respectively. Note that reduced |h{+2}=9 for the second set of |g decay curves. From the same data, evaluators obtain weighted average of 36.7 s {I5} with reduced |h{+2}=5.7 
J$possible configuration= |ph{-9/2}~#((|ng{-9/2}){+5}){-9/2}~#|ni{-11/2}(10+) 2003Ku26 further propose 27/2- from expected M3 transition to 1347, (21/2-) level, based on partial half-life of the isomeric transition of <80 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2:29/2)(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%B-$from 2003Ku26, comparison of |g intensities in the two cascades: one from IT decay and the other from |b{+-} decay of this isomer 
T$ from weighted average of values from decay curves for seven |g rays (2003Ku26). See comment in Adopted Levels 
J$possible configuration= [|ph{-9/2}~#((|ng{-9/2}{+5}){-9/2}~#|ni{-11/2}){-10+}]{-(25/2:29/2)(-)} 
E$ x=40 {I+80-40} (2003Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-,7-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$from 2000Ku06. Calculation of |p1h{-9/2}~#|n2g{-9/2} for even Bi isotopes lead to high-spin ground state of {+216}Bi (J|p=6- or 7-). According to 2000Ku06, this state decays mostly to the (8+) state of {+216}Po. 
T$from 2000Ku06. Other: 3.6 min {I4} (1990Ru02). 
%B- |b{+-} decay observed, |a decay has not been observed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (3)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
E$24 {I19} (2012Au07) from mass measurement 
T from 1989Bu09. Others: 3.6 min {I4} (1990Ru02). 
%B- |b{+-} decay observed, |a decay has not been observed 
J$daughter of {+220}At |a decay. J|p({+220}At g.s.)=3 from |b{+-} decay of {+220}Rn to {+220}At. The |a group from {+220}At has an HF|?4; therefore, one expects it to feed a level with like configuration, {Ii.e.} with J=3. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$the observed 98.5-s activity is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+217}Bi 
T$from measurement by 2003Ku25 based on |g decay curves and through |a decay of {+217}Po; weighted average of 93 s {I3} for 254.1|g, 100.5 s {I13} for 264.4|g and 98 s {I1} through |a decay of {+217}Po. 2003Ku25 quote an uncertainty of 0.8 s, but the evaluator obtains 1.3 s, which is adopted here. Others: 93 s {I11} (2014Mo15 along with 2014Mo02, from |b(ion) correlations), 93 s {I3} (1998RyZY, previous value from the same group as 2003Ku25) 
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2} 
$Only beta decay has been observed. The alpha-decay branch is expected to be negligible, if any. Calculations by 1997Mo25 give 1|*10{+9} s for its partial half-life for alpha decay, and >100 s for beta decay. 2003Bo06 calculated T{-1/2}(total |b) by using different models. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|n(g{-9/2}{+2}){-8{++}} 
E$x=20-90 keV (2014Go20) based on no K-x rays which can be assigned to a transition from this level, and systematics of neighboring nuclides 
T$average of time distributions and exponential fits for 200- and 492-keV |g rays (2014Go20). Other: 2.9 |ms {I2} and 2.8 |ms {I1} from decay curves for 492|g and 744|g, respectively (2014Go20); 2014Mo02 list 2.70 |ms {I6} from A. Gottardo, Thesis, University of Padova, 2012 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Configuration=|ph{-9/2}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{+2}){-8{++}} 
E$x=20-90 keV (2014Go20) based on no K-x rays which can be assigned to a transition from this level, and systematics of neighboring nuclides 
T$average of time distributions and exponential fits for 200- and 492-keV |g rays (2014Go20). Other: 2.9 |ms {I2} and 2.8 |ms {I1} from decay curves for 492|g and 744|g, respectively (2014Go20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-,7-,8-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from time scaling measurement of |g rays (2004De16). Others: 36 s {I14} (2012Be28, |b|g-coin decay curve by summing time spectra for 262-, 385- and 425-keV transitions); 38.5 s {I216} (2017Ca12, rounded to 38 s {I22} in 2016Ca25; (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method). 
E$the 33-s activity is assumed as the ground state, probably with J|>6 since it possibly feeds (4+), (6+) and (8+) states in {+218}Po. 2004De16 state that there is no evidence for a low-spin isomeric state 
J$from the observed direct |b-feedings to the (6+) and (8+) levels of {+218}Po, and expected coupling of |ph{-9/2} orbital with |ng{-9/2} and/or other positive-parity neutron orbitals . Shell-model calculation by 2004De16, with the consideration of |ph{-9/2}, |ng{-9/2}, and |ni{-11/2} multiplets, predicted 8- as the ground state, with the 7- and 6- states lying only |?40 keV above the g.s. For Z=83 isotopes, g.s J|p values are 9/2- or (9/2-) for odd-A from A=209 to 217, suggesting h{-9/2} proton orbital in the g.s. configuration for {+218}Bi. For N=13 isotones, g.s. J|p=(9/2+) for {+219}Po, 7/2+ for {+221}Rn, 3/2+ for {+223}Ra and (3/2+) for {+225}Th do not suggest a single neutron orbital for g.s. of {+218}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected, thus 100% |b{+-} decay mode is assigned by inference. The |b{+-}n decay mode is less likely as Q(|b{+-}n)=-110 keV {I200} (2021Wa16) 
$From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number (certainly more than few hundreds) of events are assigned to {+219}Bi 
$Production |s=118 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol). Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Bi isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 
E$the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+219}Bi nuclei 
J$proposed by 2014Mo02, based on unpaired proton in 1h{-9/2} orbital. 
T$from (implant)|b|g correlations (2012Be28) from 2800 implants, using a fitting method applicable for high background conditions. Other: 8.7 s {I29} (2016Ca25,2017Ca12, from implant-|b correlation). Statistics of the decay curve shown in Fig. 18 of 2017Ca12 is poorer as compared to those in Fig. 3 of 2012Be28, thus half-life from 2012Be28 is recommended by the evaluators. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Production |s=28.2 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number (certainly more than few hundreds) of events are assigned to {+220}Bi 
E$ the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+220}Bi nuclei 
$The |b{+-} decay is the only decay mode expected 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 7.7 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 7 s for |b decay (2011AuZY) 
J$ 1/2 for proton and 7/2 neutron configuration predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations; 1- from systematics (2011AuZY) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Bi isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ca12 and 2016Ca25, from (ion)|b correlated decay curve and analyzed by maximum-likelihood method. Since half-life of {+220}Po daughter is unknown, 2017Ca12 give a range of values between 4 and 15 s, from which T{-1/2}=9.5 s {I57} is given. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Production |s=5.00 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), a large number (certainly more than one hundred) of events are assigned to {+221}Bi 
E$ the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+221}Bi nuclei 
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=1.9 (1997Mo25) 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 17 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 5 s for |b decay (2011AuZY) 
J$ 1/2 predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations; 9/2- from systematics (2011AuZY) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Bi isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$From A/Z plot (Fig. 1 in 2010Al24), |?60 events were assigned to {+222}Bi 
$Production |s=0.667 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol) in {+9}Be({+238}U,X),E=1 GeV/nucleon. Measured production cross sections are given in Figure 2 of 2010Al24, plot of |s versus mass number for Bi isotopes, with 10% statistical uncertainty=10%, and 20% systematic uncertainty 
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the main decay modes expected. Theoretical T{-1/2}=3.9 s for |b{+-} and >10{+20} s for |a decay (2019Mo01) suggests negligible |a decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay mode is assigned by inference, although, no decay mode has yet been observed experimentally. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=3.9 s and %|b{+-}n=7 (2019Mo01). Theoretical T{-1/2}=0.195 s and %|b{+-}n=0.509 (2021Mi17) 
E$observed activity is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+222}Bi. 
T$>300 ns from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup as in 2010Al24. Assuming half-lives decrease as neutron number increases in neutron-rich nuclei, T{-1/2} for {+222}Bi is expected to <10 s from measured half-lives of 9.5 s {I57} for {+220}Bi, 8.7 s {I29} for {+219}Bi, 33 s {I1} for {+218}Bi, and 98.5 s {I13} for {+217}Bi. T{-1/2}=3 s is suggested from systematic trend by 2021Ko07. Theoretical values: 3.9 s in 2019Mo01, 0.195 s in 2021Mi17, and 1.86 s in 1984Kl06 
J$2,3 from |W{-p}=1/2 and |W{-n}=5/2 neutron orbital in theoretical calculations (2019Mo01). J|p=1- from systematics (2021Ko07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Production |s=0.199 nb (from e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 from H. Alvarez-Pol, which also stated that further analysis was in progress) 
$ From A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), |? 30 events are assigned to {+223}Bi 
E$ the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+223}Bi nuclei 
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected 
$Calculated %|b{+-}n=5 (1997Mo25) 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much larger as suggested by the calculated value of 4.7 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (1997Mo25), and systematic value of 1 s for |b decay (2011AuZY) 
J$ 1/2+ predicted in 1997Mo25 calculations; 9/2- from systematics (2011AuZY) 
$ Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Bi isotopes. Statistical uncertainty=10%, systematic uncertainty=20% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$The |b{+-} and delayed neutron decay are the only decay modes expected, thus 100% |b{+-} is assigned by inference 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=2.28 s, %|b{+-}n=12 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=147 ms, %|b{+-}n=2.23 (2021Mi17) 
$In A/Z plot (figure 1 in 2010Al24), four or five events are assigned to {+224}Bi 
$Production cross section measured in 2010Al24, values are given in figure 2, plot of |s versus mass number for Bi isotopes. Statistical uncertainty<10%, systematic uncertainty|?20% Production |s=89.2 pb (priv. comm. from H. Alvarez-Pol as e-mail reply of Oct 29, 2010 to B. Singh, which also stated that further analysis was in progress). See also D0607 dataset in the EXFOR database 
E$the observed fragments are assumed to be in the ground state of {+224}Bi nuclei 
J$2- or 3- from coupling of 1/2+ for proton and 5/2- neutron orbitals predicted in 2019Mo01 (theory); 1- from systematics (2021Ko07) 
T$>300 ns from time-of-flight as given in 2006Ca30 for a similar setup. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical value of 2.28 s for |b decay and >10{+20} s for |a decay (2019Mo01), and systematic value of 1 s for |b decay (2021Ko07). From a decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number in neutron-rich nuclei, half-life of {+224}Bi is expected as <5 s from known T{-1/2} values of 9.5 s for {+220}Bi, 22 s for {+219}Bi, 33 s for {+218}Bi and 98 s for {+217}Bi. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
%|a: only |a decay is expected to be observed due to the short half-life. E|a=8320 {I15} (2013An13); this value is presumed to supersede E{-|a}=8360 in 2005AnZY 
T From 2013An13. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%A Only |a decay has been observed. %|a=99.9 is estimated by the evaluator using the partial T{-1/2}=0.71 s (|b decay) and partial T{-1/2}=0.74 ms (|a decay) data calculated by 1997Mo25. 
J |a decay to 286 level in {+183}Pb is probably unhindered and that level deexcites via an M1 |g to the spherical (3/2-) g.s. of {+183}Pb. Based on potential energy surface calculations, 2006An11 interpret {+187}Po g.s. and {+183}Pb(286 level) as being of prolate origin and particle plus rotor calculations predict two closely-spaced, low-lying |p=- orbitals, namely, 5/2-[512] (of mixed 2f{-7/2} and 1h{-9/2} origin) and 1/2-[521] (2f{-5/2}). Assignment supported by systematics of lowest energy states of isotone chains with N=101 and N=103 of the {+183}Pb and {+187}Po isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|a: only |a decay observed by 2003Va16 and 1999An52. 
T$from |a(t) in 2003Va16; Other: 0.40 ms {I+20-15} (1999An52). 
$The {+188}Po g.s. decays by two |a branches: E|a=7910 {i15}, I|a=80 {i4} to g.s. and E|a=7355 {i35}, I|a=20 {i4} to 572 {I30}-keV level in {+184}Pb (2003Va16); see also 1999An52. |s({+142}Nn({+52}Cr,6n))=0.6 nb {I3} and |s({+142}Nd({+50}Cr,4n)) =8 nb {I4} (2005An17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E,J$level proposed by 2022Zh46 based on observed EVR-|a tagged 242|g and systematics of excited states in even-even polonium isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|a: only |a decay has been observed by 2005Va04 (and 1999An52) with E|a=7259 {I15}, 7309 {I20} and 7532 {I20}. In 1999An52, the possibility of an additional |a decay from an additional isomeric level is mentioned, and based on a comparison with {+191}Po, it was suggested that the decay energy and half-life should be similar to decay from the ground state. 2005Va04, from the same experimental group, presented potential energy surface calculations suggesting there should be only one state from which |a decay can occur. Although this is referred to as an isomeric state, it is likely that what is meant is the ground state. 
J$particle-plus-rotor model calculations produce a negative-parity prolate minimum for 7/2[514] configuration (2005Va04). However, (5/2-) is supported by favored |a decay to 278, (5/2-) state in {+185}Pb which has possible configuration=|n5/2[512]. 
T$from |a decay curve (2005Va04). Other: 5 ms {I1} (1999An52). 2005Va04 and 1999An52 are from the same group. The evaluators assume that half-life and |a decay energies as reported in 2005Va04 supersede those in 1999An52 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-,7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(M1) |g to the (5/2-). The |a hindrance factor of 1.9 suggests favored |a decay, and similar J|p values for this level and the {+193}Rn g.s. parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|e+%|b{++}=0.1 (from systematics) 
T$from 2000An14, 2001An07 (other less precise values from the same group are: 2.5 ms {I1} in 2003Va05, 2.53 ms {I33} in 1999An22, 1.9 ms {I+6-4} in 1997An09). Other: 2.0 ms {I+5-10} in 1997Ba25 and 1.7 ms {I8} in 1996Ba35, in agreement with the adopted value here, but less precise. Value of 10 ms {I+47-4} reported by 1988QuZZ is discrepant, and probably as misassignment of the activity to {+190}Po 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J Based on systematics of heavier Po isotopes: all the odd-A Po isotopes from 193 to 201 have been assigned an 3/2- ground state. Supporting evidence is provided by the hindrance factors 2.9 {i4} and 1.6 {i5} for 7334 keV {i5} and 6966 keV {i10} E|a from this level to (3/2+) states in {+187}Pb using r{-0}({+187}Pb)=1.5126 {I20} from the adjacent even-even nuclides in 2020Si16 and Q|a=7493 {I5}. The similar character of the decays to both the spherical |np{-3/2}~#|p(0p-0h) low-spin (3/2-) isomeric state and to the excited (3/2-) level with an oblate |np{-3/2}~#|p(2p-2h) intruder configuration in {+187}Pb (1999An10,2001Hu21), can be explained by assuming a mixed structure for this state, with contributions from both spherical |n3p{-3/2}~#|p(2p-0h) and deformed |n3p{-3/2}|p(4p-2h) configurations (2002An19). 
T$From 7334|a(t) (in 2002An19 (HI,xn|g)). Others: 27 ms {I+22-8} (1997Ba25 - 7330|a(t)), 15 ms {I+7-3} (2001Ke06 - 7331|a(t)), and 15.5 ms {I+6-35} (1988QuZZ - 7314|a(t)). 
%A$Not measured; assumed by 1999An10 based on systematics of %|a for lightest Po isotopes. Using calculated partial half-life of |a decay and |b decay in 2019Mo01, one gets %|a=99.98. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
Isotope shift: |D<r{+2}>({+191}Po, {+210}Po)=-0.350 fm{+2} {I40} and -0.553 fm{+2} {I40} (2013Se03). 
E From 2021Ko07 (NUBASE). Others: Authors of 2013Sa43 proposed the isomeric level at 74 keV {I15} considering the (13/2+) state of {+187}Pb at 33 keV {I13}; 40 keV {I15} in 2002An19 based on differences of the |a-ray energies for the transitions from the {+191}Po g.s. and isomeric levels, to levels in {+187}Pb. 
J For this isomeric level an oblate structure with a |ni{-13/2}~#|p(4p-2h) configuration has been proposed (1999An10,2002An19), which would explain the unhindered nature of the E(|a)=6888 keV decay to the |ni{-13/2}~#|p(2p-2h) (13/2+) excited level in {+187}Pb. 2002An19 report HF=0.76 {i17} for 6888|a to the (13/2+) isomeric level in {+187}Pb. Using the value r{-0}({+187}Pb)=1.5126 {I20}, (as noted in g.s. comment) one gets similar value as HF=0.8 {i2}. 
T From 2002An19 in (HI,xn|g) (supersedes their earlier value 98 ms {i8} (1999An10)). Others: 95 ms {I+130-60} and 110 ms {I+70-30} (2001Ke06 - from 7364|a(t) and 6878|a(t), respectively). 
%A 1999An10 assumed %|a|?100, based on systematics of %|a for lightest Po isotopes. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,J From Adopted Levels 
T From Adopted Levels. Others: 95 ms {I+130-60} and 110 ms {I+70-30} (2001Ke06 - from 7364|a(t) and 6878|a(t), respectively). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
From |a-ray energy differences to levels in the daughter {+187}Pb nucleus, the high-spin (13/2+) isomer should lie about 40 keV above the low-spin (3/2-) isomer, indicating that the latter is the {+191}Po ground state. This is consistent with the systematics of the g.s. J|p values in neighboring light Po nuclides. 
J From adopted levels 
T From 7334|a(t) (2002An19,1999An36). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Level energy held fixed In least-squares adjustment 
E From 2021Ko07 (NUBASE) - based on E|a difference. Other: 40 keV {I15} in 2002An19, based on differences between their measured |a ray energies. 
J From adopted levels 
T From 7376|a(t) (2002An19). Other: 98 ms {i8} (1999An36). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
|D<r{+2}>({+192}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.537 fm{+2} 13 (2011Co01); there exists an additional systematic uncertainty of 0.022 fm{+2}. Datum obtained using in-source resonant LASER spectroscopy. 
%|a: only |a decay observed. %(|e+|b{++})|?0.4 can be estimated from gross |b decay theory (partial T{-1/2}|?8 s) (1973Ta30), or |?0.54 from partial |b T{-1/2} of 6.1 s calculated by 1997Mo25. 
T weighted average of 33.2 ms {I14} (1996Bi17) and 32.2 ms {I3} (2001Ju09) in {+160}Dy({+36}Ar,4n|g), 31.8 ms {I15} (2003Va16) in IT decay and 34 ms {I3} (1981Le23) from |a(t). Others: 32 ms (1995Mo14; from time difference between feeding |a and decay |a); 34 ms {I+80-20} and 52 ms {I+88-37} (1997Pu01); 31 ms {I4} (1998Al27) in ({+36}Ar,4n|g); 29 ms {I+15-8} (2001Ke06,2001Uu01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E level must lie above the (10+) 2141 level because the 579|g from that level is observed in IT decay. 
J analogous to 11- isomers known in neighboring even-A Po isotopes with A|>194; possible E1 154|g to (10+) 2141. 
T from |a(t) (2003Va16) in IT decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T from {+192}Po |a(t) (1999He32, 2001Ju09). Others: 33.2 ms {I14} (1996Bi17); 31 ms {I4} (1998Al27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E level must lie above the (10+) 2141 level because the 579|g from that level is observed in IT decay. 
T from |a(t) (2003Va16). 
J an 11- isomer is known in neighboring even-A Po isotopes with A|>194. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$|d|n({+193}Po,{+196}Po)=-0.59 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+193}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.576 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03). The uncertainties are statistical only. 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.21 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical and systematic) uncertainties are given 
%A Only |a decay observed. 
T$weighted average of 450 ms {i150} (1977De32), 360 ms {i50} (1981Le23), 450 ms {i40} (1993Wa04), 180 ms {I+150-60} (1995Mo14), 290 ms {I+110-60} (1996En02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$|d|n({+193}Po,{+196}Po)=-1.11 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+193}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.532 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) The uncertainties are statistical only. 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.22 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
E$From nubase2016 - (2017Au03). Other: 95 keV {i7} in 2013Sa43. 
J$spin consistent with optical hyperfine spectrum shown in Fig. 6 of 2014Se07 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical and systematic) uncertainties are given 
%A Only |a decay observed. 
T$weighted average of 420 ms {i100} (1977De32), 260 ms {I20} (1981Le23), 240 ms {I10} (1993Wa04), 150 ms {I+110-40} (1995Mo14), 370 ms {I+160-90} (1996En02). Other: 70 ms {I+330-30} (2005Uu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 1993Wa04. Other values: 0.34 s {I+11-7} (2014Ka23), 0.20 s {I+96-9} (2005Uu02), 0.37 s {I4} (1999He32,2001Ju09), 0.42 s {I+8-6} (1996En02), 0.41 s {I3} (1981Le23), 0.70 s {I10} (1977De32), 0.6 s {I2} (1967Si09). 
$%|a=93 {I7} for {+194}Po decay was obtained by M. Leino, Ph.D. Thesis (1983), as quoted in reference 19 of 1993Wa04. Other: %|a>88%, estimated by 2014Ka23 from their |a data. Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b decay)=11.4 s and T{-1/2}(|a)=0.69 ms (2019Mo01) suggests negligible |b decay 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.517 fm {I18} (2013An02 evaluation). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+194}Po,{+208}Po)=-0.462 fm{+2} {I16} (2013An02 evaluation). Other: |D<r{+2}>({+194}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.596 fm{+2} {I10}(stat){I20}(syst) (2011Co01, collinear laser spectroscopy) 
$Measured |d|n({+194}Po,{+210}Po)=+7.36 GHz {I16} (2011Co01) 
$2013An03 estimated upper limits for the total kinetic energy release in the fission of {+194}Po, being the |b+|e daughter product of {+194}At 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$366.1|g |DJ=2, E2 to 2+; member of g.s. band 
$Q{-t}=5.4 {I8}, |b{-2}{+t}=0.17 {I3} from ({+28}Si,4n|g) (2008Gr04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Possible configuration: |ph{-9/2}~#i{-3/2} (2016An10) 
J$248.0|g (M2) to (8+) 
T$from Er-|g-|a correlations by gating with "OR" condition on 319, 366, 373 and 545 keV |g transitions (2016An10). Other: 15 |ms {I2} (1999He32,2001Ju09, (recoil)(458.6)|g(t), but 458|g is not placed by 2016An10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_comment:
$Non-physical negative transition intensity imbalance of 61 {I4} units at this level, with the assumption of I(|g+ce)=33 {I5} for the 32.2-keV transition from 2313 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Possible configuration: |ph{-9/2}~#i{-3/2} (2016An10) 
J$from (M2) 248|g to (8+) 2066 keV level 
T$from Er-|g-|a correlations by gating with "OR" condition on 319, 366, 373 and 545 keV |g transitions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this tentative level is not confirmed in the delayed-|g study by 2016An10 from an isomer in {+194}Po. Instead a 12.9-|ms isomer is assigned by 2016An10 to a 2313 level decaying by a 248|g. The 2525 level is not included in the Adopted dataset, and the 15 |ms is considered the same as the 12.9-|ms isomer 
T$from (recoil)|g(t) (1999He32) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E g.s. assignment based on E|a systematics and 1997Fo06 
J$from systematics (1980Sc26). Spin consistent with optical hyperfine spectrum shown in Fig. 5 of 2014Se07 
T from |a(t) measurement (1993Wa04). Others: 4.5 s {I5} (1967Si09), 3.9 s +32-12 (2005Uu02) 
For {+195}Po |a decay spectroscopy see 1997Fo06 
$|D<r{+2}>({+195}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.604 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03). The uncertainties are statistical only. 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.013 for |m and 0.15 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given 
$<|b{-2}{+2}>{+1/2}=0.18 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.040 for |m and 0.30 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given 
E from syst (1980Sc26) and |a decay. E=100 {I50} from 2012Au07 
J high-spin isomer based on E|a, I|a(2 s)/I|a(4.5 s)=4 (1967Si09); 13/2+ follows regional systematics (see 1976Ko13,1980Sc26). Spin consistent with optical hyperfine spectrum shown in Fig. 6 of 2014Se07 
T from |a(t) measurements (1993Wa04). Others: 2.0 s {I2} (1967Si09), 2.8 s +10-6 (2005Uu02) 
%A,%EC+%B+,%IT$from systematics (1980Sc26). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+195}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.575 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03). The uncertainties are statistical only. 
$<|b{-2}{+2}>{+1/2}=0.18 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ from 2009Gr05, recoil-distance Doppler-shift method. Analysis was that of recoil-decay tagged |g-ray spectra and differential decay curve method 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
$|D<r{+2}>({+195}Po,{+196}Po)=-0.29 GHz {I15} 
$|D<r{+2}>({+195}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.604 fm{+2} {I13} 
$<|b{-2}{+2}>{+1/2}=0.18 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
$|D<r{+2}>({+195}Po,{+196}Po)=-0.61 GHz {I15} 
$|D<r{+2}>({+195}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.575 fm{+2} {I13} 
$<|b{-2}{+2}>{+1/2}=0.18 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Measured mass excess=-11117.9 keV {I61} (2017Al34). Value is -11060 keV {I40} in 2017Wa10: AME-2016 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$deduced by 2017Al34 from mass excesses of {+195}Po g.s and isomer. 
$Measured mass excess=-10968.3 keV {I72} (2017Al34). Value is -10965 keV {I28} in 2017Wa10: AME-2016 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T from 1993Wa04 and 1985Va03. Others: 5.5 s {I5} (1967Si09), 6.8 s {I3} (1996Ta18), 5.5 s {I1} (1997Pu01),5.1 s {I+31-14}(2005Uu02). 
From systematics of |b-strength function (1973Ta30). Other: %|a=94 {I5}, |a reduced width: 73 keV {I5}, E|a=6521 keV {I5} (1993Wa04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+196}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.630 fm{+2} {I5}(stat) {I15}(syst) (2011Co01) 
$ |d|n({+196}Po,{+210}Po)=+7.73 GHz {I10} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element (0,0+ -> 463,2+)=+1.32 {I5} for both solutions. B(E2)|^=1.74 {I14} 
$E2 diagonal matrix element (463,2+ -> 463,2+)=-0.2 {I4} for solution #1, +1.1 {I5} for solution #2 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|^. Note that T{-1/2}=8.1 ps {I10} (from RDDS,2009Gr08: Phys. Rev. C 80, 014323) was used as an input parameter in GOSIA analysis by 2015Ke06 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element (0,0+ -> 859,2+)=+0.44 {I4} for solution #1, -0.44 {I3} for solution #2. B(E2)|^=0.194 {I35} from the first matrix element 
$E2 matrix element (463,2+ -> 859,2+)=+2.12 {I+16-22} for solution #1, +2.04 {I+15-18} for solution #2. B(E2)|^=0.90 {I+14-18} or 0.83 {I14} 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|^=0.194 {i35}, I|g(859)/I|g(396)=100 {I3}/64 {I2} (from {+196}Po Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database), and assumed |d(E/M1)=1.8 {i5} for the 396|g. The B(E2)|^=0.90 {I+14-18} for 463,2+ to 859,2+ gives the same level half-life 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$E2 matrix element (463,2+ -> 891,4+)=+2.68 {I11} for solution #1, +2.69 {I+12-11} for solution #2. B(E2)|^=1.44 {I12} 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2)|^. Note that T{-1/2}=5.4 ps {I8} (from RDDS,2009Gr08) was used as an input parameter in GOSIA analysis by 2015Ke06 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2016Tr07 from the decay curve for E|a=6521 from the decay {+196}Po. Value is 5.8 s {I2} in {+196}Po Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Jan 2006 update), taken from 1993Wa04 (Phys. Rev. C47, 1447) 
$Measured E|a=6521 {I5} (2016Tr07) from the decay of {+196}Po 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d|n({+197}Po,{+196}Po)=30 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+197}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.657 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03). The uncertainties are statistical only. 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.13 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.013 for |m and 0.15 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given 
%A Other: 90 {I10} (1971Ho01). Compared to 1.6 {I3} for {+201}Po, 12 {I2} for {+199}Po, 75 {I15} for {+195}Po. 
T from 1996Ta18. other: 53 s {I1} (1993Wa04), 58 s {I3} (1967Le21), 52 s {I4} (1967Si09), 60 s {I6} (1971Ho01). 
J HF(6721|a)=1.4 {I5} via (3/2-), {+201}Rn decay (7.0 s) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=SY;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E extrapolated from regional trend (1980Sc26) 
First 5/2- states in {+199}Po, {+201}Po, {+203}Po occur at 73-, 6.5-, 0.0-keV, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=SY;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$|d|n({+197}Po,{+196}Po)=0.12 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+197}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.642 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03). The uncertainties are statistical only. 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.13 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.020 for |m and 0.30 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given 
%IT Other: 1.8 (1977StZJ). Compared to 40 {I14} for {+201}Po, 2.1 for {+199}Po, <0.01 for {+195}Po. 
E from 6282|a to {+193}Pb g.s., 6383|a to 5.8-min {+193}Pb (13/2+) state at 100 keV (syst) 
J$spin consistent with optical hyperfine spectrum shown in Fig. 6 of 2014Se07 
T from 1996Ta18. other: 25.8 s {I1} (1993Wa04), 29 s {I9} (1967Le21),26 s {I2} (1967Si09), 27 s {I3} (1971Ho01),40 s {I10} (1982Bo04). 
J HF(6770|a)|?1.25 via 13/2+, {+201}Rn decay (3.8 s) 
Analog: 4.2-min {+199}Po at 311 keV; %|a=39 {I4} (1971Ho01), %IT=1.8 (1977StZJ), HF(M4,238|g)=0.45 W.u. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T from 1996Ta18. other: 53 s {I1} (1993Wa04), 58 s {I3} (1967Le21), 52 s {I4} (1967Si09), 60 s {I6} (1971Ho01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=SY;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T from 1996Ta18. other: 25.8 s {I1} (1993Wa04), 29 s {I9} (1967Le21),26 s {I2} (1967Si09), 27 s {I3} (1971Ho01),40 s {I10} (1982Bo04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$deduced by 2017Al34 from mass excesses of {+197}Po g.s and isomer. 
$Measured mass excess=-13197.1 keV {I70} (2017Al34). Value is -13130 keV {I90} from systematics in 2017Wa10: AME-2016 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
%A,%EC+%B+$From %|a=57 {I2} (1993Wa04). Other: 70 {I8} deduced from I(|a)/[I(|a)+I(|e)] (1971Ho01), 63 {I2} (systematics, 1981Sc01). 
T$From |a decay (9.7 s). Weighted average of 1.70 min {I5} (1967Le21), 1.80 min {I5} (1967Si09), 1.78 min {I5} (1971Ho01,1984Da14), 1.8 min {I1} (1982Bo04), and 1.75 min {I5} (1993Wa04). 
$|d<r{+2}>({+198}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.619 fm{+2} {I12}(stat) {I13}(syst) (2011Co01) 
$|d|n({+198}Po,{+210}Po)=+7.57 GHz {I17} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T From |a|g(t) in {+202}Rn |a decay (9.7 s) (1992Wa29) 
J From E0 to 0+ in {+202}Rn |a decay (9.7 s) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T Others: |?750 ns (1994La35), 0.69 |ms {I+76-35} (2003Gl05), 0.60 |ms {I16} (2004Gl04). 
|m=-1.86 {I4} (1986Ma31,2011StZZ) 
MOMM1 From TDPAD 
E x is unknown energy of 12+ to 10+ transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$y |?4.8 MeV from estimated SD excitation energy of 6.2 MeV {I5} at spin of 21 and 3.9 MeV at spin of 0 (2005Jo03); SD well depth is estimated (2005Jo03) to be |?3.3 MeV {I5} at spin of 11 
J$J|?6, suggested by 1996Mc01 from a fitting of spins versus rotational frequencies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
g=-0.155 {I3} from 1986Ma31 using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 
T Other: |?750 ns (1994La35) 
E x is unknown energy of 12+ to 10+ transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E$y|?4.8 MeV from estimated SD excitation energy of 6.2 MeV {I5} at spin of 21 and 3.9 MeV at spin of 0 (2005Jo03); SD well depth is estimated (2005Jo03) to be |?3.3 MeV {I5} at spin of 11 
J$J|?6, suggested by 1996Mc01 from a fitting of spins versus rotational frequencies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$E|a=6181.6 {I15} (2012Fo09). Other: E|a=6182.0 {I22} recommended by 1991Ry01 from the measured E|a: 6181 {I5} (1967Si09), 6178 {I5} (1967Tr06), 6174 {I8} (1971Ho01), 6183 {I3} (1982Bo04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+198}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.619 fm{+2} {I12}(stat) {I13}(syst) (2011Co01) 
$|d|n({+198}Po,{+210}Po)=+7.57 GHz {I17} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$Configuration=p{-3/2} 
$|d|n({+199}Po,{+196}Po)=0.11 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+199}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.644 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.09 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.010 for |m and 0.12 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given 
T$weighted average of 4.6 min {I+6-5} (1996Ta18), 5.9 min {I1} (1982Bo04), 5.2 min {I3} (1976Ko13), 5.4 min {I3} (1971Ho01), 5.0 min {I2} (1967Ti04,1965Ti03), 6.0 min {I5} (1967Si09), 5.2 min {I1} (1967Le21,1967Le08). Other: 5.2 min (1965Br17,1964Br23). 
T$ Activity with T1/2 |?11 M-|?13 and possible assignment to 199PO (1962Be26,1961Fo05,1961Be25,1959At78,1959At77,1954Ro39,1951Ka37) belongs to 200PO since observed E|a |?5850 (1961Fo05,1954Ro39, 1951Ka37) matches with E|a=5862 from |a decay of 200PO (consult ENSDF) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$Configuration=i{-13/2} 
$|d|n({+199}Po,{+196}Po)=-0.72 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+199}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.574 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.12 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.040 for |m and 0.20 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given 
J$spin consistent with optical hyperfine spectrum shown in Fig. 6 of 2014Se07 
T$weighted average of 4.3 min {I5}, 3.7 min {I8} (1996Ta18), 4.3 min {I2} (1985St02), 4.2 min {I3} (1976Ko13), 4.25 min {I25} (1971Ho01), 4.1 min {I1} (1967Le21,1967Le08), 4.20 min {I5} (1967Si09), 4.1 min {I1} (1967Ti04,1965Ti03). Other: 4.1 min (1965Br17,1964Br23) 
%EC+%B+,%IT$from it/(|e+|b{++})=0.034 (1985St02) and %|a=24 {I1} (1993Wa04) 
MOMM1$static nuclear orientation (1991Wo04,1988Wo12,2005St24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 27/2
level_comment:
J$(29/2+) proposed by 1985We05, based on mult(402|g)=stretched E2 is not supported by DCO(401|g) values from 1994La35 and 1994JiZZ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+200}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.560 fm{+2} {I9}(stat) {I11}(syst) (2011Co01). Other: |d<r{+2}>({+200}Po,{+208}Po)=-0.379 fm{+2} {I7} (1991Ko32) 
$%|a: weighted average of 11.1% {I3} (1993Wa04) and 12.2% {I6} (1967Le08); Others: 14% {I2} (1971Ho01) and 17% (1969Ha03). %|e+%|b{++} was not directly measured 
T$Weighted average of 11.4 min {I2} (1967Le08), 11.6 min {I1} (1970Ra14), and 11.3 min {I3} (1971Ho01); Other: 11.9 min {I+17-11} (1996Ta18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$361.5|g E1 from 7-; |m; systematics of similar isomers in the neighboring nuclei 
T$From |g|g(t) in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g),{+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14) by gating on transitions below and above the isomer. Others: 90 ns {I15} from 484.8|g(t) in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) where contributions from the J|p=11- (T{-1/2}=120 ns {I20}) and J|p=12+ (267 ns {I4}) isomers were taken into account; 190 ns {I60} from 484|g(t), 611|g(t) and 666|g(t) in {+191}Ir({+14}N,5n|g) (1972Na02), but the value was not corrected for contributions from the J|p=11- and 12+ isomers 
MOMM1,MOME2$ using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. |m value recommended in 2014StZZ, 2020StZV; Q value (and its sign) recommended in 2016St14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_comment:
J$808.7|g E2 to 4+, consistent with J|p=2+, 4+ or 6+. The lack of observed |g's to 0+ and 2+ would argue against J|p=2+ or 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$334.8|g E2 to 9-, 822.5|g E3 to 8+ 
T$From |g|g(t) in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g),{+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14) by gating on transitions below and above the isomer. Other: 120 ns {I20} from 335.2|g(t) in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) where the contribution from the J|p=12+ (267 ns {I4}) isomer was taken into account 
MOMM1$ Using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. Value recommended in 2014StZZ, 2020StZV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_comment:
E$Due to observation of prompt component for the 208.4|g, that depopulates this state, the level is placed below the 12+ isomer 
J$208.4|g E1 to 9- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x<25 keV estimated in 2021Ko07 
J$|m, systematics of similar isomers in neighboring nuclei 
T$Weighted average of 270 ns {I5} from |g|g(t) by gating on transitions below and above the isomer in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g),{+183}W({+22}Ne, 5n|g) (1990Ma14) and 267 ns {I4} from 208.4|g(t) in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05). Other: 298 ns {I24} in 2004Gl04 and 2003Gl05 
MOMM1$Using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique. Value recommended in 2014StZZ, 2020StZV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) by gating on transitions below and above the isomer 
$g=+0.93 {I2}, |m=+7.44 {I16} from 1990Ma14 using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From |g|g(t) by gating on transitions below and above the isomer 
$g=+1.08 {I2}, |m=+11.88 {I22} from 1990Ma14 using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T$From |g|g(t) by gating on transitions below and above the isomer 
$g=-0.149 {I2}, |m=-1.788 {I24} from 1986Ma31 and 1990Ma14 using time dependent perturbed angular distribution technique 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From 484|g(t), 611|g(t) and 666|g(t) in 1972Na02, but the value is not corrected for contributions from the 11- and 12+ isomers (see the adopted levels for details) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From 484.8|g(t) in 1985We05 and by taking into account contributions from T{-1/2}=120 ns {I20} (J|p=11-) and 267 ns {I4} (J|p=12+) isomers 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From 335.2|g(t) in 1985We05 and by taking into account the contribution from the 267 ns {I4} (J|p=12+) isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=1.06 eb {I6} from E2 matrix element (0,0+->666,2+)=+1.03 eb {I3} and E2 diagonal matrix element (666,2+ -> 666,2+)=+0.1 eb {I2} in 2015Ke06. If E2 diagonal matrix element (666,2+ -> 666,2+)=0, then B(E2)|^=1.082 eb {I16} from E2 matrix element (0,0+->666,2+)=+1.040 eb {I8} 
T$From B(E2)|^=1.06 eb {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+201}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.510 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.10 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
$%|a is unweighted average of %|a=1.15% {I1} (1967Le21) and 1.10% {I4} (1993Wa04). Other: 1.6% {I3} (1971Ho01). %|e+%|b{++} has not been directly measured 
J$atomic beam (1962Ax02) and |m 
T$Weighted average of 15.3 min {I8} (1963Ho18), 15.8 min {I3} (1967Le08), 15.1 min {I3} (1967Ti04), 16.0 min {I15} (1968Go12), 15 min {I3} (1970Jo26), 15.2 min {I3} (1970Ra14), 15.5 min {I6} (1970DaZM), 15.1 min {I4} (1971Ho01), 17.5 min {I5} (1964Br23) and 14.5 min {I10} (1976Ko13) 
$E|a=5683.3 keV {I16}, recommended by 1991Ry01. Values from individual measurements are 5674 keV {I9} (1963Ho18), 5670 keV {I10} (1967Le08), 5677 keV {I5} (1967Tr06), 5684 keV {I6} (1967Ti04), 5684 keV {I2} (1968Go12), 5689 keV {I10} (1970Jo26), 5680 keV {I10} (1970DaZM) and 5685 keV {I4} (1970Ra14). 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.010 for |m and 0.08 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given. Others: |m=0.94 {I8} (1991Wo04, using the static nuclear orientation technique), 0.74 {I11} (1988Wo12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
E$From {+205}Rn |a decay 
J$Unfavored |a-decay from {+205}Rn g.s. (J|p=5/2-). Systematics of structures in neighboring nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$|d|n({+201}Po,{+196}Po)=-2.20 GHz {I15}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+201}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.452 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.12 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
$%IT, %|a, and %|e+%|b{++} from %IT + %|a + %(|e+|b{++})=%100 and %IT/(%|e+%|b{++}) |? 0.76, deduced by the evaluator from the decay scheme and |g-ray intensities of 1986Br28. %|a is unweighted average of 2.9% {I2} (1967Le21) and 1.9% {I4} (1970Jo26). Others: %IT=28 {I+12 -7} (1971Jo19) 
E$Other: 423.8 keV {I24} in 2021Ko07 from E{-|a} 
J$417.8|g M4 to 5/2-; favored |a decay to the 319.31 keV level (J|p=13/2+) in {+197}Pb 
T$Weighted average of 8.7 min {I6} (1963Ho18), 9.0 min {I2} (1967Le08), 8.9 min {I4} (1967Ti04), 10.0 min {I15} (1968Go12), 9 min {I3} (1970Jo26), 8.8 min {I4} (1970Ra14), 8.9 min {I8} (1970DaZM), 9.0 min {I3} (1976Ko13) and 9.0 min {I3} (1986Br28) 
$E|a=5786.0 keV {I16} recommended by 1991Ry01. Values from individual measurements are 5780 keV {I7} (1963Ho18), 5770 keV {I10} (1967Le08), 5780 keV {I5} (1967Tr06), 5788 keV {I7} (1967Ti04), 5787 keV {I2} (1968Go12), 5778 keV {I10} (1970Jo26), 5780 keV {I10} (1970DaZM) and 5786 keV {I4} (1970Ra14). 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.055 for |m and 0.20 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given. Others: |m=1.00 {I8} (1991Wo04, using the static nuclear orientation technique), 0.99 {I11} (1988Wo12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$No |g-rays reported in 2010De04 to depopulate this level, presumably due to small branchings to low-lying states. Evidence for the existence of this level is from |g|g coin data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
%A$From 1993Wa04. Others: 2.2% {I3} (1971Ho01), 0.73% {I5} (1970Jo26), 2.0% {I2} (1967Le21), and 2% (1965Br17). 
T$Weighted average of 44.7 min {I5} (1993Wa04), 45.0 min {I15} (1971Ho01, 1965Ti03), 43 min {I2} (1970Jo26) and 43.7 min {I13} (1970DaZM). Others: 44 min (1965Br17). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+208}Po,{+202}Po)=-0.300 fm{+2} {I3} (1991Ko32); |d<r{+2}>({+202}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.470 fm{+2} {I12}(stat) {I8}(syst) (2011Co01); |d|n({+202}Po,{+210}Po)=+5.72 GHz {I14} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$677.2|g E2 to 0+. 
$B(E2)|^ from <0{++}{-1}|| E2 ||2{++}{-1}>=+1.06 {I+15-13} and <2{++}{-1}|| E2 ||2{++}{-1}>=-0.7 {I+13-12} in Coulomb Excitation (2015Ke06) 
T$From B(E2)|^=1.12 {I+34-26} in Coulomb Excitation (2015Ke06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x<40 keV estimated from delayed ce spectrum in 1976Be12 
J$912.5|g E3 from 11-; |m; systematics of similar isomers in neighboring {+200}Po and {+204}Po nuclei 
T$From time difference between transitions above isomer (912.6|g and 526.6|g) and below isomer (442.9|g, 571.6|g and 677.4|g) (1976Ha56). Others: |?100 ns (1998Bi06), 85 ns {I15} (1976Be12, 1990Fa03), 165 ns {I20} (1971Ha01); 185 ns {I30} (1972Na02). 
MOMM1$From 2020StZV based on g=0.927 {I9} in 1976Ha56, but corrected for diamagnetism and Knight shift. Method: time dependent perturbed angular distribution. 
MOME2$From 1997Ne06, 2021StZZ 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$526.6|g E1 to 8+; population in the ({+11}B,6n|g), ({+12}C,4n|g) and ({+12}C,6n|g) reactions that favor yrast states 
T$Value between 1-2 ns in 1976Be12. Others: <11 ns (1990Fa03). 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$386.0|g E2 to 9-; |m 
T$From 912.6|g(t) and 386.0|g(t) in 1976Ha56. Others: >200 ns (1990Fa03), 100 ns {I50} (1976Be12) 
MOMM1$From g=1.03 {I3} in 1976Ha56. 2020StZV gives 11.9 {I4}. Method: time dependent perturbed angular distribution. 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},i{-13/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 15-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$138.3|g E2 to 13-. 
T$From |g(t) in 1976Be12 and 1990Fa03 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++2})|n(p{-3/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}); the assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From {+197}Au({+11}B,4n|g) x <40 keV. X=22 keV was suggested in 1992Hu04 based on wrong placements of 625.3|g and 603.2|g transitions. 
T$|?100 ns was determined from the time difference spectra between 502.8|g, 526.3|g and 603.2|g (above the isomer) and 677.2|g, 571.3|g and 433.0|g keV (below the isomer) (1998Bi06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T$From time difference between transitions above isomer (912.6|g and 526.6|g) and below isomer (442.9|g, 571.6|g and 677.4|g) in 1976Ha56. Others: 165 ns {I20} (1971Ha01) and 185 ns {I30} (1972Na02), but values probably do not account for the feeding from the 11- isomer 
$g=0.927 {I9} (1976Ha56,time dependent perturbed angular distribution) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_comment:
T$25 ns {I10} was reported in 1971Ha01 using 526.6|g(t), but this value is associated with the decay of the 11- isomer (not observed in 1971Ha01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 912.6|g(t) and 386.0|g(t) (1976Ha56). 
$g=1.09 {I3} corrected for diamagnetism and Knight shift by 1.0053 {I4} (1976Ha56,time dependent perturbed angular distribution) 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},i{-13/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$Because 912.5|g(t) and 386.0|g(t) are close to the repetition time of beam bursts, value can not be determined accurately. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x<40 keV estimated from delayed ce spectrum in 1976Be12. 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Because 912.5|g(t) and 386.0|g(t) are close to the repetition time of beam bursts, value can not be determined accurately. 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++1},i{-13/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^ from <0+{-1}|| E2 ||2+{-1}>=+1.06 {I+15-13} and <2+{-1}|| E2 ||2+{-1}>=-0.7 {I+13-12}. Other: 0.98 {I8} from <0+{-1}|| E2 ||2+{-1}>=+0.99 {I4} and <2+{-1}|| E2 ||2+{-1}>=0 
T$From B(E2)|^=1.12 {I+34-26} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
%A$From 1967Le21. Others: |~0.02% (1961Be25,1963Be28), 0.5% {I1} (1970DaZM), and 0.025% {I3} (1970Jo26) 
J$From hyperfine splitting in 2013Se03,2014Se07 and atomic beam in 1961Ax02; |p from |m 
T$From |g(t) in 1970DaZM. Others (from |a(t)): 29 min {I1} (1967Le21), 33 min {I2} (1967Ti04), 33 min {I1} (1970Jo26), 36.0 min 25 (1970DaZM), and 47 min {I5} from growth of {+203}Bi daughter (1951Ka03). 
MOMM1$Recommended in 2019StZV from 2014Se07 using resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. Others: (+)0.739 {I56} (1991Wo04) and (+)0.742 {I26} (1987VaZH) 
MOME2$From 2014Se07 using resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. 
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+203}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.425 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
J$Unfavored |a decay from the {+207}Rn g.s. (J|p=5/2-); systematics of similar structures in neighboring {+201}Po (at 141 keV) and {+205}Po (at 143 keV) nuclei. 
CONF$Dominant |n(p{-1/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J$469.4|g M1 to 3/2-, 531.9|g E2+M1 to 5/2-; systematics of similar structures in neighboring nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$%IT=100 from 1986Fa04. Note, that %|e+%|b{++}=4.3% {I15} branch was quoted in 1976Ko13, but it was not adopted in the present evaluation. The reported 261.5-, 577.0- and 904.9-keV |g rays in the daughter nucleus {+203}Bi (1976Ko13), that were used to determine the %|e+%|b{++} branching ratio, are not assigned to {+203}Bi. 
J$From hyperfine splitting in 2013Se03,2014Se07; |p from |m; 641.5|g M4 to 5/2- 
T$From 1986Fa04. Other: 1.2 min {I2} (1969MoZV) and |?1 min (1976Ko13). 
MOMM1$Recommended in 2019StZV from 2014Se07 using resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. 
MOME2$From 2014Se07, using the resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. 
$|d|4r{+2}|5({+203}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.352 fm{+2} {I13} (2013Se03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J$434.5|g M1(+E2) to (7/2)-; 621.7|g M1+E2 to (5/2)-; direct feeding in {+203}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$291.7|g M1(+E2) to (9/2,11/2)+; 1029.7|g M1+E2 to 13/2+; direct feeding in {+203}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$304.3|g E1 to 23/2+; 385.7|g E1 (J to J) to 25/2+. 
T$From 1986Fa04, using 304.3|g(t), 335|g(t), 288|g(t) and 767|g(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
CONF$Dominant |n(f{-5/2}{+-1})~#2{++}. Small |n(f{-7/2}{+-1}) admixtures are possible in order to account for the E3 transition from the J|p=13/2+ isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%IT$from 1986Fa04. Note, that %|b{+-}=4.5% has been suggested by 1976Ko13, but no evidence was given by the authors. 
T$From 1986Fa04. The reported values were: 45 s {I1} (639.4|g(t)), 45 s {I1} (641.8|g(t)), and 44 s {I2} (577.2|g(t)). Others: 1.2 min {I2} (1969MoZV) and |?1 min (1976Ko13). 
CONF$Dominant |n(i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From 1986Fa04. The reported values were: 45 s {I1} (639.4|g(t)), 45 s {I1} (641.8|g(t)), and 44 s {I2} (577.2|g(t)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$%|a: Unweighted average of 0.660 {I7} (1965AnZZ), 0.66 {I8} (1963Be28), 0.75 {I10} (1967Le08), and 0.62 {I6} (1971Go35). Other: 5.3 {I4} (1970Jo26) 
T$Weighted average of 3.53 h {I3} (1961La02), 3.50 h {I1} (1965AnZZ), 3.57 h 2 (1970Ra14), and 3.55 h {I15} (1970DaZM) (|a-decay measurements), and 3.525 h {I20} (1965AnZZ) and 3.69 h {I11} (1970DaZM) (|g-ray measurements following {+204}Po |e decay). Others: 3.8 h (1951Ka03), 3.5 h {I6} (1956Bu12), 3.6 h {I2} (1961Fo05), 3.6 h {I1} (1967Ti04), and 3.5 h {I1} (1970Jo26) 
$E|a=5377.1 keV {I12} recommended in 1991Ry01 from measured energies of 5379 {I5} (1967Ti04), 5377 {I1} (1969Go23), 5380 {I10} (1970Jo26), 5379 {I3} (1970Ra14) and 5374 {I5} (1970DaZM) (with the energy adjusted for calibration as suggested by 1991Ry01). The energies measured by 1969Go23 and 1970Ra14 were used by 2003Au03 as input in their mass adjustment. The output of Q(|a)=5484.8 {I14} corresponds to E|a=5377.4 {I14} 
$|D<r{+2}>({+208}Po,{+204}Po)=-0.206 {I2} (1991Ko32) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
J$570.8|g M1+E2 to 2+; |g(|q) excludes 2+; the absence of a |g-ray transition to g.s. (J|p=0+) would argue against 1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$950.25|g (M1+E2) to 2+ and 433.7|g to 4+; absence of a |g-ray transition to g.s. (J|p=0+) would argue against 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$12.1|g to 6+; |m, systematics of similar isomers in neighboring nuclei 
T$Weighted average of 140 ns {I5} (1971Ha01), 143 ns {I5} (1970BrZO), 150 ns 10 (1983He08), 158 ns {I2} (1987Ra04), and 150 ns {I10} (1990Fa03). Others: 190 ns {I20} (1970Ya03) and 140 ns (1972Be12) 
MOMM1$From g-factor=+0.923 {I13} (1973Br14) deduced using the stroboscopic resonance technique. The value was corrected for Knight (1.2% {I4}) and diamagnetic (-1.79%) shifts. Other: 7.28 {I32}, from g-factor=0.91 {I4} (1973Na18) measured using the stroboscopic resonance technique. This value was corrected for Knight and diamagnetic shifts by 0|+1%. 
$Configuration=(|p h{-9/2}){++2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4+)
level_comment:
J$1031.5|g to 2+; non observation in {+204}At |e decay (J|p=7+) or in {+204}Pb(|a,4n|g), {+198}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) suggests J|<4; absence of a |g-ray transition to g.s. (J|p=0+) would argue against J=1,2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$414.6|g to 6+, 489.5|g and 841.1|g E1's to 4+ levels 
$Main configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+-1}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$588.3|g E1 to 8+ 
T$From 588|g(t) in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04). Others: |?17 ns in {+204}At |e decay (1983He08), 15 ns {I4} (1976Be12), <22 ns (1990Fa03), and |?20 ns (1970Ya03) in {+204}Pb(|a,4n|g), {+198}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) 
$Main configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+-1}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_comment:
J$609.14|g M1+E2 to 8+, 621.20|g to 6+. The I|g(609.1|g)/I|g(621.2|g) ratio is inconsistent with both 609.1|g and 621.2|g being dipole transitions, thus arguing against J|p=7+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6,7,8
level_comment:
E$This level is placed in accordance with the {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) data, where the depopulating 926.3|g feeds the 1627-keV level (J|p=6+) 
J$Level directly populated in {+204}At |e decay (J|p=7+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$93.1|g E1 to 10+ 
T$From 93|g(t) in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) 
$Main configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++1}(|p i{-13/2}){++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$261.8|g E1 to 12+. The A{-2}=0.13 {I18} for 261.8|g in {+204}Pb(|a,4n|g), {+198}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) might suggest J|p=12- 
T$From 261.8|g(t) and 598.1|g(t) in {+204}Pb(|a,4n|g), {+198}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1990Fa03) 
$Main configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++2}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$124.8|g (E2) to 13-; |m 
T$Weighted average of 13 ns {I3} (1976Be12), 11 ns {I1} (1982Ha16), and 13 ns {I2} (1990Fa03) in {+204}Pb(|a,4n|g), {+198}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) 
MOMM1$From g-factor=0.41 {I2} deduced using the in-beam time differential perturbed angular distribution technique from |g(|q,t) of {+204}Po implanted in nickel foil (1982Ha16). For calibration of the internal magnetic field, 1982Ha16 assumed g-factor=0.91 for the 6+ state in {+208}Po. 
$Main configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++2}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Using 426|g(t), 516|g(t), and 684|g(t) 
$g=0.91 {I4} (1973Na18) measured using the stroboscopic resonance technique. This value was corrected for Knight and diamagnetic shifts of 0|+1% 
$Configuration=(|p h{-9/2}){++2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Others: 190 ns {I20} (1970Ya03), 140 ns (1976Be12). 
$g-factor=+0.923 {I13} (1973Br14) deduced using the stroboscopic resonance technique. The value was corrected for Knight (1.2% {I4}) and diamagnetic (-1.79%) shifts. 
$Configuration=(|p h{-9/2}){++2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 1976Be12. Others: <22 ns (1990Fa03) and |?20 ns (1970Ya03) 
$Main configuration=((|n i{-13/2}){+-1}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Value deduced using 261.8|g(t) and 598.1|g(t) (1990Fa03) 
$Main configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++2}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Other: 13 ns {I3} (1976Be12) and 11 ns {I1} (1982Ha16) 
$g-factor=0.41 {I2} deduced using the in-beam time differential perturbed angular distribution technique from |g(|q,t) of {+204}Po implanted in nickel foil (1982Ha16). For calibration of the internal magnetic field, 1982Ha16 assumed g-factor=0.91 for the 6+ state in {+208}Po. 
$Main configuration=((|p h{-9/2}){++2}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+204}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.363 fm{+2} {I9}(stat) {I6}(syst) (2011Co01) 
$ |d|n({+204}Po,{+210}Po)=+4.42 GHz {I11} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
%A$from %|a({+205}At)/%|a({+205}Po)=18.4% {I16}/0.074% {I16} (1961La02) and %|a({+205}At)=10% {I2} (1974Ho27). Others: %|a=0.58% {I4} (1970Jo26) and 0.074% {I16} (1951Ha83). 
J$Atomic beam (1961Ax02); |p from |m 
T$Unweighted average of 1.66 h {I2} (1983He09) and 1.80 h {I4} (1970DaZM); Others: 1.8 h {I1} (1956Be97) and 1.8 h {I2} (1967Ti04,1970Jo26). 
MOMM1$Deduced using the nuclear magnetic resonance from oriented state technique (1983He09,2014StZZ). 
MOME2$Deduced using the atomic beam magnetic resonance technique (1961Ol01). 
$|D<r{+2}>(205,208)=-0.185 {I6} (1991Ko32) using the laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy technique. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$161.03|g M2 to 9/2-; direct feeding in {+205}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 
T$From 719|g(t) in 1973Fo07. Other: 0.644 ms in 1962Ha26. 
MOMM1$deduced using differential perturbed angular distribution technique (1974BrXD,2014StZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
J$580.9|g E3 to 13/2+. 
T$Weighted average of 57 ms {I1}, from ce(580K)(t) in (1974Ro36), 58 ms {I2} from 581|g(t) in 1973Fo07 and 62 ms {I5}, from 581|g(t) in 1974Oh06 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$1651.22|g (M1) to 5/2-, 484.00|g M1+E2 to 7/2-, 1495.4|g to 3/2-; direct feeding in {+205}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$334.2 E2 to 21/2+. 
T$From |g(t) in 1985Ra18, obtained from a two-isomers fit to 334.2|g, 373.9|g and 636.3|g time spectra. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J$691.4|g M1(+E2) to 9/2+, 1413.43|g M1(+E2) to 5/2+; direct feeding in {+205}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$568.5|g M1+E2 to (7/2,9/2,11/2)+, 3052.0|g to 5/2-; direct feeding in {+205}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$1537.2|g M1 to 5/2+, 1775.5|g to (9/2)-, 3172.0|g to 5/2-; direct feeding in {+205}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1985Ra18, obtained from a two-isomers fit to 334.2|g, 373.9|g and 636.3|g time spectra. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M3
level_comment:
T$From |g(t) in 1985Ra18. Sample time spectra are presented in 1985Ra18. The absence of prompt component in the 260|g(t) spectrum indicates that 260|g directly depopulates the isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$from a reanalysis of HFS measurements using calculated electronic structure parameters (2024Sk01) and experimental values of A constants for the 6p{+3}7s{+1} {+5}S{-2} state. 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+205}Po in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
$%|a is from 1967Le08. %|e+%|b{++} has not been measured directly. Others: %|a=10 (1947Te01) and 5 {I1} (1955Mo68) 
T$From 1956Jo34. Others: 9 d (1947Te01), 8.83 d (1957Ar61), 9.5 d {I8} (1961Be25), 8.75 d (1967Le08) 
$E|a=5223.7 keV {I15} is recommended by 1991Ry01 
$|d<r{+2}>({+208}Po,{+206}Po)=-0.104 {I1} (1991Ko32) 
$|d<r{+2}>({+206}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.250 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I3}(syst) (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$700.66|g E2 to 0+ 
$B(E2)|^=0.64 {I+48-32} from E2 matrix element=+0.8 eb {I+3-2} (2016Gr17). Diagonal E2 matrix element=-2.0 eb {I+40-29} (2016Gr17) 
T$From |t=6.2 ps {I0.5}(stat) {I0.9}(syst) in 2024Ko23 using RDDS and by taking into account the feedings from the 2{-2}{++}, 4{-1}{++} and 4{-2}{++} states. Others: 4.8 ps {I+13-11} in 2023Ka31 using RDDS and by taking into account the feeding from the high-lying 4{-1}{++} and 4{-2}{++} states; 2.6 ps {I+19-13} from B(E2)|^ in 2016Gr17 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$477.10|g E2 to 2+ 
T$Weighted average 62 ps {I5} (2019St13,|g|g(|Dt)), 70 ps {I6} (2023St05,|g|g(|Dt)) and 58.6 ps {I+54-50} (2023Ka31,RDDS) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$256.53|g M1(+E2) to 4+, 733.73|g (E2) to 2+, 138.9|g E2 from 6+ 
T$From 2023Ka31 using the RDDS technique. Value corresponds to the effective level half-life, since the side-feeding components were not taken into account 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$From 1973Br14,2020StZV (g=0.919 {I13}, stroboscopic technique) and 1973Na18 (g=0.915 {I13}, stroboscopic and time-difference PAC technique) 
MOME2$From 1987Ma65,2021StZZ (time-difference PAC technique) 
J$|m; systematics of known 8+ isomers in neighboring nuclei 
T$Weighted average of four independent |g|g(t) measurements using gates on transitions below and above the isomer in 1990Ba31. Others: 210 ns {I10} (1986Ra24), 160 ns {I40} (1970Ya03) and 212 ns {I5} (1970BrZO). 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$61.766|g E1 and 676.4|g (E1) to 8+ 
T$From |g|g(t) in 1990Ba31. Others: 1.0 |ms {I1} in 1986Ra24 and >200 ns in 1976Be12 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$237.6|g E1 to 10+ 
T$From 237.6|g(t) in 1990Ba31 
$Configuration=dominant |p(h{-9/2}{++1},i{-13/2}{++1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of four independent |g|g(|Dt) measurements using gates on transitions below and above the isomer (1990Ba31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of four independent |g|g(t) measurements using gates on transitions below and above the isomer (1990Ba31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 1986Ra24, deduced from 395|g(t), 477|g(t) and 700|g(t) after taking into account the contribution from the 9- (T{-1/2}=1.0 |ms {I1}) isomer Others: 160 ns {I40} (1970Ya03) 
$g-factor=+0.919 {I13} (1973Br14) using the stroboscopic technique. The value was corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic effect; g-factor=0.916 {I13}, weighted average of 0.905 {I18} (deduced using the stroboscopic technique) and 0.926 {I18} (deduced using the time-difference PAC technique) (1973Na18). Both values were corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic effect 
$Configuration=|p(h{-9/2}{++2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$Unweighted average of 0.95 |ms {I10} (62|g(t)) and 1.1 |ms {I2} (614|g(t)) in 1986Ra24 
$Configuration=|n(f{-5/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From |t=89 ps {I7} and 395|g-477|g(|Dt) using LaBr{-3}(Ce) detectors, by gating on 701|g in HPGe detectors (2019St13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From |t=6.2 ps {I0.5} (stat) {I0.9} (syst) using RDDS and by taking into account the feedings from the high-lying 2{-2}{++}, 4{-1}{++} and 4{-2}{++} states in 2024Ko23. Other: 4.8 ps {I+13-11} in 2023Ka31 using RDDS and by taking into account the feeding from the high-lying 4{-1}{++} and 4{-2}{++} states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From 2023Ka31 by taking into account the feeding from the high-lying 4{-2}{++} and 6{-1}{++} states (2023Ka31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 2023Ka31. Value corresponds to the effective level half-life, since the side-feeding components were not taken into account 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.64 {I+48-32} from E2 matrix element=+0.8 eb {I+3-2} (2016Gr17). Diagonal E2 matrix element=-2.0 eb {I+40-29} (2016Gr17) 
T$From B(E2)|^ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$Atomic beam (1961Ax02). Favored |a decay to {+203}Pb g.s. (J|p=5/2-) 
T$Weighted average of 5.83 h {I7} (1974Pa05), 5.81 h {I4} (1978Ya04), and 5.79 h {I2} (1983He09). 
%A$From (1974Pa05). Others: |?0.01 (1947Te01), 0.028 {I3} (1970AfZZ, but claimed by 1971Go35 to be incorrect), 0.008 {I1} (1971Go35) 
MOME2$From Q({+207}Po)/Q({+205}Po)=1.7 {I8} (1983He09) 
$|D<r{+2}>(207,208)=-0.078 {I5} (1991Ko32) using laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy. 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-0+}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$68.55|g E2 to 5/2-. Favored |a decay from {+211}Rn g.s.(J|p=1/2-) 
T$From (|a)(ce)(t) in {+211}Rn |a decay (1963As02) 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-0+}(|n p{-1/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$167.900|g M1(+E2) to 1/2-; 236.477|g M1(+E2) to 5/2- 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-0+}(|n p{-3/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$300.648|g M2 to 9/2-. |m systematics. 
T$Weighted average of 47 |ms {I7} (1962Ha26) and 50 |ms {I5} (1973Co30) in {+207}Po IT decay 
MOMM1$From g=-0.140 {I2} (1973Ri06), corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-0+}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$268.08|g E3 to 13/2+ 
T$From 268|g(t), 300|g(t) and 814|g(t) in {+207}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1978Sc12). Others: 2.8 s {I2} (1961WhZZ) and 2.8 s {I1} (1985Ra18) 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-8+}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$339.10 M1(+E2) to 7/2-, 1118.25|g to 3/2-. Direct population in {+207}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) excludes 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2,9/2-
level_comment:
J$862.46|g to 9/2-, 1676.50|g to 5/2-. Direct population in {+207}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) excludes 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2,9/2)-
level_comment:
J$233.58|g M1(+E2) to (7/2-,9/2-), 1781.67|g to 5/2-. Direct population in {+207}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) excludes 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$66.2|g E2 to 21/2+ 
T$From 576.2|g(t), 622.2|g(t), and 749.2|g(t) in 1985Ro07. Systematics uncertainty due to time calibration and background subtraction has been included. Other: 40 ns {I2} is reported in 1985Ra18, based on 37 ns {I4} (66|g(t)), 42 ns {I2} (181|g(t)), 40 ns {I1} (576|g(t)), 40 ns {I1} (622|g(t)), and 41 ns {I1} (749|g(t)) all in {+208}Pb(|a,5n|g),{+206}Pb(|a,3n|g) 
MOMM1$From g=0.433 {I3} (1985Ro07). Value is corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding. 
CONF$67.5% (|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-8+}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) + 32.5 % (|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-6+}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+,11/2+
level_comment:
J$1054.22|g M1 |g to 11/2+, 1712.60|g to 13/2+. Direct population in {+207}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) excludes 13/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+,11/2+)
level_comment:
J$1263.71|g (M1) to 9/2+, 1334.0|g to 7/2-, 1730.76|g to 13/2+. Direct population in {+207}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2-)
level_comment:
J$1409.86|g M1 to (7/2-,9/2-), 1684.07|g to 13/2-, 2721.3|g to 3/2-. Direct population in {+207}At |e decay (J|p=9/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From adopted levels 
G$Corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-0+}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$From 268|g(t), 300|g(t) and 814|g(t) in {+207}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) 
CONF$(|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-8+}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 25/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 576.2|g(t), 622.2|g(t), and 749.2|g(t) in 1985Ro07. Systematics uncertainty due to time calibration and background subtraction has been included. Other: 40 ns {I2} is reported in 1985Ra18, based on 37 ns {I4} (66|g(t)), 42 ns {I2} (181|g(t)), 40 ns {I1} (576|g(t)), 40 ns {I1} (622|g(t)), and 41 ns {I1} (749|g(t)). 
G$Corrected for Knight shift and diamagnetic shielding. 
CONF$67.5% (|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-8+}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) + 32.5 % (|p h{-9/2}){++2}{-6+}(|n i{-13/2}){+-1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$from a reanalysis of HFS measurements using calculated electronic structure parameters (2024Sk01) and experimental values of A constants for the 6p{+3}7s{+1} {+5}S{-2} state. 
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+207}Po in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T from 1970Jo19 (rounded off from 2.8976 {I16}. Note: 1 year=365.242 d). Others: 1949Ke10 (3.0 y {I2}), 1950Te03 (2.93 y {I3}) 
$%|e: from 1993Sa14 in {+208}Po |e decay. Other:0.00223 (1966Ha29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of values from {+208}At |e decay (4.0 ns {I5}), {+206}Pb(|a,2n|g) (4.8 ns {I5}), {+209}Bi(p,2n|g) (4.8 ns {I5}), and {+204}Hg({+9}Be,5n|g) (3.74 ns {I21}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$T{-1/2}. |m. Analogy with {+204}Po, {+206}Po, and {+210}Po 
T$from 1976Ha56 in {+206}Pb(|a,2n|g). Others: 380 ns {I50} in {+209}Bi(p,2n|g) and 380 ns in |e decay 
MOMM1$from g factor in (|a,2n|g) (1976Ha56). Others: 7.36 {I6} (1970Na11), 7.39 {I5} (1975ReZW) in (|a,2n|g) and 7.30 {I7} (1973Na18) in ({+3}He,3n|g). All values are corrected for diamagnetism (-1.9% {I2}) and Knight shift (1.4% {I4}) (see 1976Ha56) 
MOME2$from time-dependent perturbed angular correlation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to 8+. E1 |g to 10+. Analogy with {+210}Po. 
T$from ({+9}Be,5n|g). Others:8.0 ns {I1} from (|a,2n|g), 8 ns {I2} from (|a,4n|g), and 8.0 ns {I5} from (p,2n|g) 
MOMM1$from g=1.101 {I13} in (|a,2n|g) (1985Ro07). Other: 12.3 {I5} from (|a,4n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14-,15-,16-
level_comment:
J$M1 |g to 15-. In ({+9}Be,5n|g), 1997Po04 give |DJ=0 for the 390|g to the 4062, 15- level; however, they also give J|p(4452)=(14-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from |a,|g(t) (1976Ha56). Others: 1970Ya03 (380 ns {I100}), 1968Tr06 (380 ns {I90}) 
g-factor: from |a,|g(|q,H,t) (1976Ha56). Value is corrected for diamagnetism (-1.9% {I2}) and Knight shift (1.4% {I4}). Uncorrected value is 0.919 {I1}. Other uncorrected values: 0.911 {I5} (1970Na11), 0.919 {I4} (1975ReZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|G=0.85 MeV {I40} 
E interpreted by the authors as the double isobaric analog state. |s is in agreement with double charge exchange systematics 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 1985Ra21 
$g-factor: from 1973Na18 based on stroboscopic resonance method. Value is corrected for Knight shift (1.4% {I4}) and diamagnetism (-1.9% {I2}) (see 1976Ha56). The value of 1973Na18 is a weighted average of their value in that work, and an earlier value by the same authors. The uncorrected weighted average is 0.913 {I4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from a,147|g(t) (1967Ya01) 
g-factor: from (712|g)(|q,H,t) (1975WeZX). This value is corrected for diamagnetism (-1.9% {I2}) and Knight shift (1.4% {I5}) (see 1976Ha56) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+208}Po,{+210}Po)=-0.134 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I2}(syst) (2011Co01) 
$ |d|n({+208}Po,{+210}Po)=+1.63 GHz {I12} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from weighted average of 0.86 ps {I12} (recoil-576|g analysis), 0.76 ps {I15} (recoil-1263-|g analysis) and 0.84 ps {I25} (recoil-576|g-686|g analysis) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) data (2021Br06), also presented in 2020BrZZ: Jour. of Phys. Conf. Series 1643, 012116 (2020) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$optical spectroscopy (1976Fu06), L(d,t)=1 
T$Weighted average of 125.2 y {I33} in 2014Co16, based on 30 datasets measured over a period of 20.7 years using a liquid scintillator technique (superseded 128 y {I7} by the same collaboration (2007Co07)) and 120 y {I6} in 2015Po03, based on measurements of two sources measured for 359 and 369 days. Other: 102 y {I5} from {+209}Po/{+208}Po mass and activity ratios in 1956An05 and the presently adopted T{-1/2}({+208}Po)=2.898 y {I2}. Authors in 1956An05 obtained T{-1/2}=103 y using T{-1/2}({+208}Po)=2.93 y {I3}. 
%A,%EC+%B+$from measured %I(|e)=0.454 {I7} and %I(|e+|b)+%I(|a)=100 (1996Sc24). Others: %|a=99.52 {I4} (1989Ma05) and 99.74 (1966Ha29). 
$1966Ch27: JOSA 56, 1292 (1966) 
MOMM1$from optical spectroscopy (1966Ch27). A value of |?+0.77 quoted by 1989Ra17. Other: 0.61 {I5} from 1991Ko32 by atomic beam laser spectroscopy. 
$The rms charge radius (<r{+2}>){+1/2}: 2013Se03 gives |d|n({+209}Po,{+196}Po)=-6.75 GHz {I10}, |d|4r{+2}|5({+209}Po, {+210}Po)=-0.0813 fm{+2} {I10} and |4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.09. The systematic uncertainties from electronic factor and mass-shift calculations not included. 
$configuration=|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3, 545.0|g E2 to 1/2-. 
T$from (790.2|g)(545.0|g)(|Dt) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay (1971Al31) 
$configuration=|n(2f{-5/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$90.8|g E2 to 9/2- 
T$weighted average of 24.8 ns {I14} (1974Be74) in {+208}Pb(|a,3n|g), 24.4 ns {I15} (1976Ha56) in {+207}Pb(|a,2n|g), 24.8 ns {I14} (1971Al31) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay, and 24.1 ns {I4} (2009Ni05) in (d,2n|g) 
MOMM1$from 1976Ha56 by TDPAD, includes corrections for diamagnetism and Knight shift 
MOME2$from 2009Ni05 in (d,2n|g) by TDPAD. 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++2}~#|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$54.9|g E2 to 13/2- 
T$weighted average of values from {+207}Pb(|a,2n|g) (88.5 {I15}) and (d,2n|g) (89.4 {I5}). {+208}Pb(|a,3n|g) gives 98.1 ns {I16} by gating on 781.9|g and 545.0|g, which follow the |g decay of the T{-1/2}=24.3 ns isomer at E=1417.66, while 88.5 ns {I15} in {+207}Pb(|a,2n|g) is from gating on 54.9|g decay of this level. 
MOMM1$from 1976Ha56, includes corrections for diamagnetism and Knight shift 
MOME2$from 2009Ni05 in (d,2n|g) by TDPAD. (-)0.39 {I8} from 1983Da01 in (|a,3n|g) by TDPAD 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++2}~#|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$239.19|g E1 from 13/2+; 195.0|g M1+E2 to 9/2-; see also 1761-keV level 
T$from (790.2|g)(781.9|g)(|Dt) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay (1971Al31) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}){++2}~#|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=6, 239.190|g E1 to 11/2-; 239|g(|w,t) in 209Po |e decay, and the E1, M1+E2, E2 cascade from 1761 to 545 (J|p=5/2-) uniquely establishes J|p(1761)=13/2+, J|p(1522)=11/2-, and J|p(1326)=9/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$2654.5|g to 1/2- and 1478.9|g and 2109.5|g to 5/2-. But Possible |e feeding from 9/2- would be consistent only with 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$1297.4|g E3 to 17/2- 
T$preliminary value from 603.0|g(t) in {+208}Pb(|a,3n|g) (1974Be74) 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#|n(3p{-1/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)+
level_comment:
J$1581.6|g E1 to 9/2-, 1147.6|g E2(+M1) to 13/2+; |g(|q) rules out J=7/2, but J|p=9/2+ is possible. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 31/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$96.9|g E1 to 29/2+ and 1289.1|g E3 to 25/2+ 
T$weighted average of 119 {I4} from {+208}Pb(|a,3n|g) (1974Be74) and 110 {I4} from ({+9}Be,4n|g) (2000Po03) 
MOMM1$from {+208}Pb(|a,3n|g) (1976Re12). Value includes corrections for diamagnetism and Knight shift. Also quoted by 2011StZZ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-2 \}){+3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 31/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$185.6|g E1 to 29/2+ and 1377.6|g (E3) to 25/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#|n(1i{-13/2}){+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 35/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$824.6|g M1 to 33/2- 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#\ |n(3p{-1/2}{+-1}2f{-5/2}{+-1}2g{-9/2}{++1}){+3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 37/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$148.0|g E1 to 35/2- and 1238.0|g (E3) to 31/2- 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#|n(3p{-1/2}{+-2}1j{-15/2}{++ \1}){+3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 39/2+
level_comment:
J$729.4|g M1 to 37/2+ 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#|n(3p{-1/2}{+-1}2f{-5/2}{+-1 \} 1j{-15/2}{++1}){+3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (41/2+)
level_comment:
J$574.6|g (M1) to 39/2+ and 1304.1|g (E2) to 37/2+ 
$CONF=11-~#|n(3p{-1/2}{+-1}1i{-13/2}{+-1}2g{-9/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J$analog of {+209}Bi g.s. from (p,n) and (p,np') data. Widths determined from the two reactions do not agree. 1974Fi14, in (p,n) show that both |s and |G are sensitive to the choice of line shape for the resonance and background. They suggest that the discrepancy may be due to difficulties with experimental precision and reduction of data. For alternate explanations see 1973Gr13, 1974Wo04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 90.8|g(t) (1976Ha56) 
MOMM1$from g-factor obtained using the Time Dependent Perturbed Angular Distribution (TDPAD) in 1976Ha56 with corrections for diamagnetism and Knight shift 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 54.9|g(t) (1976Ha56). 
MOMM1$from g-factor in 1976Ha56 using TDPAD method. 
MOME2$from 1983Da01 using TDPAD method. 
G$Other: 0.897 {I15} (1973Na18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 545|g(t) and 782|g(t). 100 ns {i25} from 54.9|g(t) 
MOME2$from 1983Da01 using TDPAD method. 
G$weighted average of 0.90 {I5} (1973Ab09) and 0.88 {I5} (1968Ya08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 31/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of values from 1974Be74 (118 ns {I3}) and 1976Re12 (132 ns {I10}) 
G$from |a,|g(|s,H,t) H=8.4-25.5 kG (1976Re12). Value includes corrections for diamagnetism and knight shift 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 31/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 1289.0|g(t), 206.5|g(t) and 603.0|g(t) (2000Po03). 
$configuration=|p(1h{-9/2}1i{-13/2}){++2}~#|n(2g{-9/2}{++1}3p{-1/2}{+-2 \}){+3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from |DE(C)=18994 {I12} and Q({+209}Po)=1892.6 {I16} (2012Wa38) 
$Analog of {+209}Bi g.s.. |G=257 keV {I35}, 299 keV {I35} (1974Fi14, for Breit-Wigner, Gaussian line shapes, respectively), 235 keV {I50} (1973Gr13), 151 keV {I34} (1972Cr07, Breit-Wigner), 380 keV {I80} (1970Cr05, Breit-Wigner). |G=327 keV {I31} from 1972Cr04 and partial widths for decay to states in {+208}Bi with assumed configuration neutron hole lj coupled to an h{-9/2} proton are 60, 36 {I3}, 68 {I4} for p{-1/2}, f{-5/2}, p{-3/2} hole states, respectively. These partial widths are normalized to 60 for the p3/2 hole state, a calculated value quoted by 1969Ig01. The weighted average of these values is 263 keV {I31}, which gives T{-1/2}|?1.7|*10{+-6} fs. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 24.5 ns {I4} from data at 45|' and 23.6 ns {I5} at 90|' (2009Ni05) 
MOME2$obtained using TDPAD method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 89.8 ns {I5} from data at 45|' and 88.7 ns {I7} at 90|' (2009Ni05) 
MOME2$obtained using TDPAD method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T from 1964EiZZ, calorimeter. Other values: 138.37 d {I3} (1953Cu46), 138.401 d {I6} (1954Ei20). Others: 1931Cu01, 1949Be54, 1953Gi10. 2012Do08 measured 138.6 d {I15}, 105.2 d {I44}, and 138.4 d {I23} for room temperature, 293 K, and 4.2 K, respectively, from {+210}Po |a decay. 2014Po01 measured 140.2 d {I29}, 139.2 d {I29} at 4.2 K and 139.6 d 29, 143.3 d {I30} at 293 K. 
Isotope shift (1991Ko32). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 245|g E2 to 2+; (245|g)(1181|g)(|q). 
T$Weighted average of 1.53 ns {I7} (1976Ha56 - (|a,2n|g), 1.53 ns {I8} (1973Be30), and 1.60 ns {I6} (1973Na21). Uncertainty - lowest expt. value. Other: 1.8 ns {I2} (1963Fu02). Later values via {+210}At |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 46.9|g E2 to 4+. 
MOMM1 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1976Ha56,2014StZZ). 
T from |g|g(t) in {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g) (1976Ha56). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 83.5|g E2 to 6+. |m systematics in {+202}Po to {+208}Po supports a configuration=(|p 1h{-9/2}){+2}8+ (1976Ha56,1973Br14). 
MOMM1 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1976Ha56,2014StZZ). Other: 1973Ya06. 
MOME2 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1991Be03,2014StZZ). Other values: Q=0.57, differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1987Ma65,1983Da01,1989Ra17). Q=0.568 {I30}, level mixing spectroscopy (1997Ne06). 
T$weighted average of 101.0 ns {I12}, ce(t) in {+209}Bi(t,2n|g) (1988Ma32), and 96.0 ns {I14}, |g(t) in {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g) (1976Ha56). See {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g) for other values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J 960|g E1 to 4+, 1205|g E1 to 2+. 
T from B(E3)=0.63 {I7} in {+210}Po(d,d') (1973El06) and adopted I|g(2386|g)-branching. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 1292|g E3 to 8+. Analogy with 85-ns {+202}Po at |?2.62 MeV with |m=11.9 {I4} (1976Ha56), and 8.3-ns {+208}Po at |?2.71 MeV with |m=+12.3 {I4} (1978LeZA). 
MOMM1 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1976Ha56,1976Re12,2014StZZ). 
MOME2 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1991Be03,2014StZZ). Other values: Q=0.82 {I12}, adjusted by evaluator relative to Q(1557)=-0.552, differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1987Ma65,1989Ra17). Q=(-)0.79 {I19}, adjusted by evaluator relative to Q(1557)=-0.552, differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1983Da01,1989Ra17). 
T from ce(t) in {+209}Bi(t,2n|g) (1988Ma32). See {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g) for other values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 1523|g E2 to 11-, RUL. Main configuration=(({+208}Pb 5-)(|p 1h{-9/2}){+2}{-8+})13-, where 5-, {+208}Pb at 3198 keV is configuration=((|n 2g{-9/2})(|n 3p{-1/2}){+-1}). This configuration is consistent with experimental B(E2) values for deexciting transitions, and also with measured |m (1985Be22,1976Ha56). 
MOMM1 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1985Be22,1989Ra17), adjusted by evaluator for adopted T{-1/2}. 
MOME2 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1991Be03). Other values: Q=0.87 {I7}, adjusted by evaluator relative to Q(1557)=-0.552, differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1987Ma65,1989Ra17). Q=-0.60 {I11}, adjusted by evaluator relative to Q(1557)=-0.552, differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1983Da01,1989Ra17). 
T$weighted average of 56.1 ns {I14}, ce(t) in {+209}Bi(t,2n|g) (1988Ma32), and 51 ns {I2}, |g(t) in {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g) (1985Be22). See {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g) for other values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$J|p=3+ is assigned in 1980Gr09 (d,p). 1999Kl03 notes it is doubtful since 4592|g (M3) has to compete with E1, M1, and E2 |g-ray transitions that were not observed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14-
level_comment:
J 405|g M1+E2 to 13-, 280|g M2 from 16+. Configuration=(({+208}Pb 6-)(|p 1h{-9/2}){+2}{-8+})14-, where 6-, {+208}Pb at 4206 keV is configuration=((|n 1i{-11/2})(|n 3p{-1/2}){+-1}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 686|g E3 to 13-. Systematics of B(E3) values in the lead region (1985Be22). Main configuration=(({+208}Pb 5-)(|p 1h{-9/2})(|p 1i{-13/2}))16+. 
MOMM1 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1985Be22,2014StZZ). 
MOME2 Differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1991Be03,2014StZZ). Other value: Q=-1.29 {I8}, adjusted by evaluator relative to Q(1557)=-0.552, differential perturbed angular distribution of |g rays (1986MaZP,1989Ra17). 
T weighted average of 265 ns {I10}, |g(t) (1985Be22), and 262 ns {I6}, ce(t) (1985Ka07) in {+208}Pb(|a,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19-)
level_comment:
J$Assignment assumes 1285.3|g to be of E3 multipolarity ((19-) to 16+). Absence of lifetime for this level supports the expected multipolarity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ from |g|g(t) (({+13}C,|a3n|g)-2008Dr03) 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}i{-13/2}) ~#|n[(p{-1/2}{+-2}g{-9/2}j{-15/2}) or (i{-13/2}{+-1}j{-15/2})] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$Other values: 1.53 ns {I8} (1973Be30), 1.8 ns {I2} (1963Fu02), 1.60 ns {I6} (1973Na21) via {+210}At |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
Branching: I|g(965|g)/I|g(881|g)/I|g(250|g)=73 {I19}/100/95 {I21} (1972Ja12), 33/100/83 (1971Fa18) via (|a,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1976Ha56 |g|g(t). Others: 38 ns {I5} (1963Fu02), 40 ns {I6} (1972Ja12), 40.9 ns {I10} (1973Na21), 43.0 ns {I15} (1973Be30) via {+210}At |e decay 
g-factor=0.913 {I6} (1976Ha56) corrected for Knight shift (1.4% 4) and diamagnetism (-1.9% {I2}) 
g-factor(8+ state) - g-factor(6+ state)=-0.020 {I7} (1973Ba14), 0.006 {I3} (1976Ha56); 1973ArYJ, 1977To04 calc support 1976Ha56 value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1976Ha56. Others: |?150 ns (1967Ya01), 110 ns {I8} (1968Is04), 115 ns {I10} (1971Be55) 
E 1310 keV calc (1978Ma38) 
g-factor=0.925 {I11} (1970Ya02), 0.904 {I14} (1970Ya06,1972Na33), 0.909 {I7} (1973BaVA,1973Ba14), 0.901 {I11} (1973Na18,1974Na02), 0.914 {I1} (1976Ha56) 
Corrected g-factor=0.919 {I5} (1976Ha56) corresponds to configuration=(|p 1h{-9/2}) {+209}Bi g.s. (g=0.9135 {I1}) 1973Br14. Small deviation from additivity rule are discussed by 1976Ha56, 1977To04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1976Ha56. Others: 24 ns {I5} (1967Ya01), 24 ns {I3} (1971Fa18), 20.1 ns {I13} (1976Ha62) 
E 2710 keV calc (1978Ma38) 
g-factor=1.107 {I16} (1970Ya06,1972Na33), 1.107 {I10} (1976Re12), 1.102 {I8} (1976Ha56) 
g-factor configuration=(|p 1i{-13/2})=1.24 {I2} is obtained from corrected g=1.107 {I12} (1976Ha56) for configuration=((|p 1h{-9/2})(|p 1i{-13/2})) and g=0.9135 {I1} (1973Br14) for {+209}Bi g.s. configuration=(|p 2h{-9/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from |g(t), (1985Be22). Other values: 93 ns {I6} (1971Bl07,1971Fa18), 78 ns (1970Ya03). 
E 4300 keV calc (1978Ma38) 
Corrected g-factor=0.526 {I13} (1985Be22). Other value: corrected g-factor=0.546 {I12} (1973Ya06); configuration added g-factor=0.573 calc from 5-, {+208}Pb (g=0.021 {I7}) 1969Bo01, and 8+, {+210}Po (g=0.919 {I5}). See also 1976Ha56. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 265 ns {I10}, |g(t) (1985Be22) and 262 ns {I6}, ce(t) (1985Ka07). 
E 5460 keV calc (1978Ma38). 
Corrected g-factor=0.615 {I5} (1985Be22). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_comment:
C{+2}S'=2.3 theory 
S excess strength may be attributed to the missing 3- member; C{+2}S'=0.9 exp, 0.7 calc 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
C{+2}S'=1.1 theory; 5- (|a,t) strength is split between 2911,3026 levels as for direct {+210}At |e transitions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
E from {+210}At decay (1972Ja12) 
Split 5- (|a,t) strength is ascribed to mixing of configuration=(({+208}Pb 5-)(|p 1h{-9/2}){+2}{-0}) and configuration=(|p 1h{-9/2}) (p,1i13/2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E first 3- excitation of {+206}Pb,{+208}Pb occurs at 2648,2615 keV, respectively 
B(E3)(0+ to 3-)=0.63 {I7} (1973El06) relative to B(E3)({+208}Pb,0+ to 3-)=0.72 {I4} (1968Zi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
Close-lying 5- states divide almost equally the strength observed for 5-, {+208}Pb at 3198 keV. Split of 5- states is attributed to configuration mixing 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$ from |g|g(t) (2008Dr03) 
$Possible configuration=|p(h{-9/2}i{-13/2}) ~#|n[(p{-1/2}{+-2}g{-9/2}j{-15/2}) or (i{-13/2}{+-1}j{-15/2})] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=2.6 ps {I4}, DSAM (2017Ko34). Value of T{-1/2}=5.9 ps {I12} from B(E2) in (d,d') as given in {+210}Po Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (March 2014 update) is in sharp disagreement. 2017Ko34 discuss the reason for discrepancy, and ascribe it to model dependency in the analysis of (d,d') data. 2017Ko34 find that their experimental B(E2) value is still lower by a factor of two as compared to estimates within a pure seniority scheme or the shell model result. Authors recommend either additional experiments or adjustments in theory. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d|n({+211}Po,{+196}Po)=-8.99 GHz {I10}; |d|4r{+2}|5({+211}Po,{+210}Po)=0.104 fm{+2} {I10} (2013Se03). Method: resonance ionization laser spectroscopy using RILIS at ISOLDE-CERN. Beam of {+211}Po produced in bombardment of UC{-x} with 1.4 GeV protons. Systematic uncertainties from electronic factor and mass-shift calculations are about the same magnitude as the quoted values, and are not included 
$|4|b{-2}{+2}|5{+1/2}=0.12 (2013Se03,2014Se07) 
J$L=4 in {+210}Po(d,p); M1 |g from 11/2+ level. 
T$from 1974Ba29. Others: 0.56 s {I4} (1958To25), 0.52 s (1954Sp32), 0.5 s {I1} (1954Wi26). 
MOMM1,MOME2$hyperfine structure studies using in-source resonance ionization laser spectroscopy at CERN-ISOLDE facility (2014Se07). Total (statistical uncertainties=0.030 for |m and 0.08 for Q, and systematic) uncertainties are given. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q), excit; E3 |g to 9/2+ g.s. 
T$from 1998Mc03. Other value: 15.9 ns 14 (1973FaZD). 
MOMM1$from g-factor (|g(|q,H,t) {+208}Pb(|a,n|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$Level needed to explain weak delayed feeding of 1427 level in in-beam reactions (1981Fa01,1998Mc03) 
T From 1998Mc03. Other: 20 ns {I5} (1981Fa01) 
J$(21/2+) from shell-model calculations (1998Mc03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from |DQ(|a) of the |a groups from {+211}Po(1462 level) and {+211}Po(g.s.) to {+207}Pb g.s. 
J$shell model; T{-1/2} and branching ratio indicate that the unobserved 34-keV isomeric transition to (17/2+) level is probably E4 or M4. 
T$weighted average of 24.2 s {I5} (1974Ba29), 25.5 s {I3} (1962Pe15). 28 s {I1} (1982Bo04), 25 s {I2} (1962Ka15), 25 s (1954Sp32), 24.9 s 14 (1998Mc03). 
%A,%IT$measured I|a(7449.3) from {+211}Po g.s. decaying with T{-1/2}=25.2 s (1989Ku08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E$this level could be either the 2079.0 or the 2094.0 level observed in {+208}Pb(|a,n|g). 
J$L=0 in {+210}Po(d,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2-)
level_comment:
J$ gammas to (33/2-) and (37/2+). Configuration=({+210}Po,5-)~#((|p h{-9/2}){++2}(|n i{-11/2})) (1998Fo04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (43/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$ |g to (37/2-) is expected as E3. Configuration= ({+210}Po,5-)~#((|p h{-9/2})(|p i{-13/2})(|n i{-11/2})) (1998Fo04). 
T$From 1998Mc03. Other value: 2 |ms {I1} (1998Fo04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$level postulated to explain T{-1/2}|?20 ns observed for the 362.9-keV |g. 1981Fa01 suggest that this is the 21/2+ level with E(calc)|?1500. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$based on ({+9}Be,|a2n|g) (1998Mc03), this level is defined as 1735.6+x in Adopted Levels, decaying by 308.0|g to 1427.6+x level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from |DQ(|a) of the |a groups from {+211}Po(1462 level) and {+211}Po(g.s.) to {+207}Pb g.s. 
J$shell model; T{-1/2} and branching ratio indicate that the unobserved 34-keV isomeric transition to (17/2+) level is probably an E4 or M4. 
T$weighted average of 24.2 s {I5} (1974Ba29), 25.5 s {I3} (1962Pe15). 28 s {I1} (1982Bo04), 25 s {I2} (1962Ka15), 25 s (1954Sp32), 24.9 s 14 (1998Mc03). 
%A,%IT$measured I|a(7449.3) from {+211}Po g.s. decaying with T{-1/2}=25.2 s (1989Ku08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 293.9 ns {I10} (stat) {I6} (syst) (2017Ap03) and 294.7 ns {16} (stat) {I8} (syst) (2013Be31), with systematic and statistical uncertainties combined in quadrature prior to taking the weighted average. A third recent study reports a half life of 298.8 ns {I8} (stat) {I14} (syst) (2014Be39), if this value is included, the weighted average becomes 295.2 ns {I13}. Others: 350 ns {I60} (2018Sa45), 302 ns {I27} (2018So16), 260 ns {I30} (2012Be14), 290 ns {I+40-30} (2003Da24), 309 ns {I11} (1981Bo29), 296 ns {I2} (1975Sa06), 304 ns {I8} (1972Mc29), 305 ns {I5} (1963As02), 304 ns {I4} (1949Bu09). See also 1962Fl03, 1957Ec08, 1953Ha09, 1949Va01, and 1948Hi21. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 727.3|g to 0+ 
%A$from I|a(from 727 level)/I|a(from g.s.)=34|*10{+-6} (1979Ry03, based on 1970GrYO,1965Le08) 
T$from RDDS in {+208}Pb({+12}C,{+8}Be|g) (2017Ko38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$E2 405.2|g to 2+ level 
%A$from {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+14}C|g) (2010As03) Other: %|a|?27 from I|a and branching in {+212}Bi |b{+-}|a decay (25.0 min) (1978Ba44,1984Es01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E2 223.0|g to 4+ level, |g(|q) ({+208}Pb({+9}Be,|an|g)) 
T$from |g(t) in {+208}Pb({+9}Be,|an|g) (1987Po14) 
%A$from {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+14}C|g) (2010As03). Other: %|a|?71 from I|a and branching in {+212}Bi |b{+-}|a decay (25.0 min) (1978Ba44,1984Es01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E2 120.9|g to 6+ level 
T$weighted average of 14 ns {I1} (2010As03), 14.7 ns {I3} (1981Bo29), 14.2 ns {I24} (1978Li14). Others: 17.1 ns {I2} {+208}Pb({+9}Be,|an|g) (1987Po14) 
%A$from {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+14}C|g) (2010As03). Others: %|a|?42 from 1978Ba44, 1984Es01; see {+212}Po |a-decay (17.1 ns) data set, %|a=6 {I1} from {+209}Bi(|a,p|g) (1978Li14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 2+ level, |g|g(|q) ({+212}Bi |b{+-} decay (60.55 min)). 
T$from DSAM in {+208}Pb({+12}C,{+8}Be|g) (2016Ko03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q), M1+E2 |g to 2+ level ({+212}Bi |b{+-} decay (60.55 min)) 
%A$from I|a(from 1679.3 level)/I|a(from g.s.)=1|*10{+-5} (1979Ry03, based on 1970GrYO,1965Le08) 
T$from DSAM in {+208}Pb({+12}C,{+8}Be|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$E0 transition to 0+ g.s. 
%A$from I|a(from 1801 level)/I|a(from g.s.)=1.6|*10{+-4} (1979Ry03, based on 1970GrYO,1965Le08). A single |a group is measured which likely corresponds to the 1801-keV and 1806-keV levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q), M1+E2 |g to 2+ level ({+212}Bi |b{+-} decay (60.55 min)) 
%A$from I|a(from 1806 level)/I|a(from g.s.)=1.6|*10{+-4} (1979Ry03, based on 1970GrYO,1965Le08). A single |a group is measured which likely corresponds to the 1801-keV and 1806-keV levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=0 d {I661}.5|g to 6+ level. 
J$from DSAM in {+208}Pb({+12}C,{+8}Be|g). Other: 0.34 ps {I11} {+208}Pb({+18}O,{+14}C|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_comment:
J$|g(|q) rules out |DJ=2 Q transition to 10+ level ({+208}Pb({+9}Be,|an|g)); analogy with {+214}Rn suggests 11-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (18+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from Q(|a)({+212}Po 45.1 s level)-Q(|a)({+212}Po g.s.), taking E|a to g.s. from 1976FrZO. 
J$shell model suggest 16+ or 18+ for this isomer. From RUL the unobserved isomeric transition to (14+) level is not of E2 multipolarity. Therefore, J|p |= 16+. For further discussion see 1989Ku08, 1987Po14. 
T$from the decay of 8.53-, 9.08- and 11.65-MeV |a's (1962Pe15). Other: 47 s {I10} (1962Ka15) 
%A,%IT$from I|a(8.784 MeV)/I|a(11.65 MeV) (1989Ku08) (see |a decay data set). 
$Production: {+209}Bi(|a,p) (1989Ku08); daughter {+212}Bi |b{+-} decay (7.0 min). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$population of this level and the 1476-keV level is proposed by 1980Di09 based on observation of a 10.18 MeV |a group. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$population of this level and the 1355-keV level is proposed by 1980Di09 based on observation of a 10.18 MeV |a group. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (18+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$from Q(|a)({+212}Po 45.1 s level)-Q(|a)({+212}Po g.s.), taking E|a to g.s. from 1976FrZO. 
J$shell model suggest 16+ or 18+ for this isomer. From RUL the unobserved isomeric transition to (14+) level is not of E2 multipolarity. Therefore, J|p |= 16+. For further discussion see 1989Ku08, 1987Po14. 
T$from the decay of 8.53-, 9.08- and 11.65-MeV |a's (1962Pe15). Other: 47 s {I10} (1962Ka15) 
%A,%IT$from I|a(8.784 MeV)/I|a(11.65 MeV) (1989Ku08) (see |a decay data set). 
$Production: {+209}Bi(|a,p) (1989Ku08); daughter {+212}Bi(7.0 min) |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$from |DQ(|a) of 10.18-MeV |a decaying with T{-1/2}=14.2 ns. Subsequent measurements show E(14.6 ns level)=1476.4 keV (see {+212}Po adopted levels). 
T$from (10.18 MeV |a)(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from RDDS (2017Ko38), average of two limits 15.1 ps {I13} (13.3 ps {I12}), extracted as a weighted average of lifetimes obtained from forward and backward detectors, assuming fast (slow) feeding from the 3{+-} state, see 2017Ko38 for details. Evaluators adopted value recommended by 2017Ko38, where the uncertainty is larger than either input value which might reflect additional systematic uncertainties. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$depopulating transition of 120 keV is not discernible in Fig. 1 of 2016Ko03, however, observed 10+ to 8+ transition would suggest that the 8+ yrast level is populated. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM (2016Ko03), evaluators adopt value recommended by 2016Ko03 which appears to be average of 0.506 ps {I49} (analysis-I) and 0.478 ps {I42} (analysis-II) with larger uncertainty than either input value which might reflect additional systematic uncertainties. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM (2016Ko03), evaluators adopt value recommended by 2016Ko03 which appears to be average of 0.568 ps {I28} (analysis-I) and 0.513 ps {I49} (analysis-II) with larger uncertainty than either input value which might reflect additional systematic uncertainties. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (6)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.347 ps {I28} (analysis-I) and 0.319 ps {I28} (analysis-II), both from line shape analysis of 661|g (2016Ko03); uncertainty taken as lowest input value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |t=100 ps {I14} measured using 223|g-405|g(t) using centroid shift method (2021Vo14). Other: |t=114 ps {I18} using indirect 223|g-727|g(t) gating (2021Vo14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |t=1.66 ns {I28} from weighted average of |t=1.75 ns {I26} from slope method and |t=1.56 ns {I30} from 121|g-405|g(t) using centroid shift method (2021Vo14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$295.02 ns {I18} (stat) {I17} (syst) from the time difference of {+212}Bi |b{+-} events and {+212}Po |a events (2022Be20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (18+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,T,J$from Adopted dataset for {+212}Po in ENSDF database 
$Decay modes from Adopted dataset for {+212}Po in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |t=101 ps {I7} weighted average of |t=100 ps {I9} from forward ring analysis and 103 ps {I10} from backward ring analysis, both from RDDM (2022Ka52) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J favored |a decay to {+209}Pb g.s. (J{+|p}=9/2+). 
T Weighted average of 3.709 |ms {I2} (2020Ko06 - 440|g-|a(t)), 3.705 |ms {I1} (2018Al32 - deduced from the 622-day decay curve using parent {+229}Th), 3.5 |ms {I3} (2018Sa45 - |a{-1}-|a{-2}-|a{-3} correlations), 3.65 |ms {I4} (1998Wa25), 3.75 |ms {I4} (1997Wa27), 3.70 |ms {I3} (1997VaZV), and 3.74 |ms {I2} (1995WaZQ), 4.2 |ms {I8} (1948Je05), 3.708 |ms {I8} (2013Su13 - {+213}Po |a decay). Others: 4.2 |ms (1949Me54), and 3.65 |ms (2002Mo46). 
E|a (group 1)=8376 {I3} (1982Bo04), 8377 {I5} (1964Va20), 8368 {I10} (1960Vo05); E|a (group 2)=7614 {I10} (1964Va20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 292.78|g (M1+E2) to 9/2+ state. 2011As05 ({+18}O,X|g) proposed spin parity 7/2+ instead of 11/2+. 
T From delayed |g|g-coin in {+213}Bi |b{+-} decay (1997Wa27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
%|a<0.001 from 1997Wa27 (see {+213}Bi |b- decay). 
J 440|g M1 to 9/2+ state. log| {Ift}=6.1 in 9/2- {+213}Bi |b{+-} decay. HF|>70 estimated in 1997Wa27. 2011As05 ({+18}O,X|g) proposed spin-parity 11/2+ instead of 7/2+. 
T From |b-|g coincidences in {+213}Bi |b{+-} decay (1997Wa27). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
J$2011As05 ({+18}O,X|g) proposed spin-parity to be 9/2+ instead of 13/2+, since it was not populated in their work. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_comment:
$ Possible configuration: |p (h{-9/2}{++2})~#|n (g{-9/2}{++1}), |p h{-9/2}{+2}~#|n i{-11/2} (2011As05 - probably a misprint). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from 2015Al10 and 2016Al28 with 580-day continuous measurements; others: 150 |ms {I20} (1939Du01), 140 |ms {I15} (1939Ro03), 145 |ms {I5} (1941Ro01), 155 |ms {I5} (1943Ja01), 163.7 |ms {I2} (1950Vo02), 158 |ms {I2} (1953Ba60), 164.3 |ms {I18} (1961Do02), 165 |ms {I3} (1971Er02), 160 |ms {I12} (1993Zh30), 164.2 |ms {I6} (2012Su11), 163.6 |ms {I3} (2013Be13), 163.5 |ms {I8} (2013Al11) and 163.8 |ms {I30} (2013Be20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$E1 to 2+; no |g to 0+; |a to 0+ in {+210}Pb; |a from 0+ in {+218}Rn. 
%A$from 1965Le08 with I(8950|a)/I(7688|a)=2x10{+-7} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from {+214}Bi |b- decay 
J$E0 to 0+; E2 to 2+ 
%A$from 1965Le08 with I(9080|a)/I(7688|a)=2.2x10{+-5} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$M1 to 2+; |a to {+210}Pb 0+ and |b{+-} from 1- {+214}Bi with log| {Ift}=6.859 {I13} 
%A$from 1965Le08 with I(9500|a)/I(7688|a)=1x10{+-6} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+)
level_comment:
J$D(+Q) to 2+; |g to 0+; |g to 3- 
%A$from 1965Le08 with I(9802|a)/I(7688|a)=1.2x10{+-6} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$|g to 0+; E2 to 2+; |g to 3-; |a to 0+ in {+210}Pb and |b{+-} from 1- {+214}Bi with log| {Ift}=7.94 {I4} 
%A$from 1965Le08 with I(9907|a)/I(7688|a)=7x10{+-7} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 1+; |g to 2+; no |g to 0+, 1- and 3; |a to 0+ in {+210}Pb and |b{+-} from 1- {+214}Bi with log| {Ift}= 7.69 {I5} 
$%|a from 1965Le08 with I(10150|a)/I(7688|a)=2x10{+-7} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 0+; |g to 2+ and |g to 3- 
%A$from 1965Le08 with I(10332|a)/I(7688|a)=8x10{+-7} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-,3-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 2+; |g to 1-; |g to 3-; no |g to 0+; no |g to 1+ and |b{+-} from 1- {+214}Bi with log| {Ift}= 7.73 {I11} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 0+; |g to 2+; |a to 0+ in {+210}Pb and |b{+-} from 1- {+214}Bi with log| {Ift}= 7.78 {I7} 
$%|a from 1965Le08 with I(10505|a)/I(7688|a)=2x10{+-7} and I(|g+ce). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$163.640 |ms {I38} (stat) {I93} (syst) from the time difference of {+214}Bi |b{+-} events and {+214}Po |a events (2022Be20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.627 fm {I20}; deduced from interpolation of evaluated rms charge radii of {+208}Po to {+216}Po (2013An02), with slope k{-z}=0.37 in formula 9 of 2004An14 
T$weighted average of 1.778 ms {I5} (1961Vo06), and 1.784 ms {I6} (1971Er02). Other value: 1.83 ms {I4} (1942Wa04). 
J$favored |a decay (HF=1.4) to {+211}Pb (J|p=9/2+). 
%B-$from observation of |?8 MeV |a from {+215}At decay (1950Av61). Other values: |?5|*10{+-4} (1944Ka01,1944Ka02); |?4|*10{+-4} (1955Ad09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T (|a)(ce)(t) coin (1974Bo11). Other value: <250 ps (1969Be67). 
J$271.2|g M1+E2 to 9/2+; 130.6|g M1+E2 from 5/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$favored |a decay (HF=3.4) from {+219}Rn (J|p=5/2+); 401.8|g E2 to 9/2+ 
T from T{-1/2}(402 level)/T{-1/2}(271 level)=0.336 {I23} (Doppler shift measurement in {+219}Rn |a decay) and using T{-1/2}(271 level)=195 ps {I15} (1974Bo11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,9/2+
level_comment:
J$517.6|g M1(+E2) to 9/2+; 224.0|g to (11/2)+. J|p=7/2+ member of possible configuration=|ph{-9/2}{+2}~#|ng{-9/2}{+4}~#|ni{-11/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+,13/2+)
level_comment:
J$608.3|g to 9/2+; no gamma rays to 7/2+ or 5/2+. Possible J|p=13/2+ member of configuration=|ph{-9/2}{+2}~#|ng{-9/2}{+5}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$ large |a hindrance factor (HF=31 from 5/2+ {+219}Rn parent). Level belongs to possible ground state configuration=|ph{-9/2}{+2}~#|ng{-9/2}{+5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from T{-1/2}(402)/T{-1/2}(271)=0.336 {I23} (Doppler shift measurement), and T{-1/2}(271)=195 ps {I15} (1974Bo11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$from the Adopted Levels of {+215}Po in ENSDF database. 
T$from the time distribution of consecutive |a events in the recorded offline data using the delayed coincidence method. The |Dt is statistical and corresponds to the overall standard uncertainty of the fit procedure. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.144 s {I8} from 2003Da24 and 0.145 s {I2} from 1963Di05. Others: 0.158 s {I8} (1942Wa04), 0.145 s {I15} (1911Mo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$ |d<r{+2}>({+216}Po,{+210}Po)=+0.733 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I5}(syst) (2011Co01) 
$ |d|n({+216}Po,{+210}Po)=-8.82 GHz {I11} (2011Co01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2018Ba44 (see Fig. 6b in this paper) from |a-decay curve. This value can be compared to 0.145 s {I2} in {+216}Po Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (March 2007 update). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from the distribution of time intervals between the detection of the 6288-keV |a particle from {+220}Rn decay and that of the 6778-keV |a particle from {+216}Po decay (2017Na22). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Limit on |b{+-} decay was obtained by comparing the intensities of the |a groups from {+221}Rn, {+221}Fr, {+217}Po, and {+217}At decays. Other measurement: %|a>80, %|b{+-}<20 (1956Mo15). Gross |b-decay calculation of 1973Ta30 gives %|b{+-}<1. 
MOMM1,MOME2$for J=9/2 from in-source laser spectroscopy. The statistical and systematic uncertainties for |m and Q given in Table II of 2015Fi07 are combined here in quadrature. Other: |m=-1.126 {I105}, Q=0.00 {I44} for J=11/2 (2015Fi07). 
J$laser resonance spectrum shows several peaks, consistent with spin=9/2 or 11/2 for the ground state of {+217}Po, but (9/2+) is supported by favored |a decay of {+217}Po to g.s. of {+213}Pb, as well as by measured g factor which is consistent with theoretical value for |ng{-9/2}, not with |ni{-11/2} (2015Fi07) 
$Measured isotopic shifts (2015Fi07): |d|n({+217}Po,{+216}Po)=+1.060 GHz {I150} for 9/2, +1.165 GHz {I150} for 11/2. |d|n({+217}Po,{+210}Po)=-9.880 GHz {I200} for 9/2, -9.985 GHz {I200} for 11/2 
$Measured mean-square charge radius (2015Fi07): |d<r{+2}>({+217}Po,{+210}Po)=0.821 fm{+2} {I17}(stat) {I6}(syst) for 9/2; 0.830 fm{+2} {I17}(stat) {I6}(syst) for 11/2 
T$weighted average of 1.53 s {I5} (2003Ku25, from |a-decay curve, their previous value was 1.48 s {I5} in 1998RyZY same group as 2003Ku25), 1.6 s {I2} (2004Li28, from |a-decay curve). Other: <10 s (1956Mo15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius=5.6558 fm {I173} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated charge radius relative to {+208}Po: |d|4r{+2}|5({+218}Po,{+208}Po)=+1.092 fm{+2} {I15} (2013An02) 
%B-$unweighted average from 1958Wa16 (%|b{+-}=0.0185) and 1952Hi60 (%|b{+-}=0.022 {I3}). Earlier measurements: 1943Ka04, 1944Ka01, 1949Wa05. %|b{+-} was deduced from intensity of {+218}At |a group observed to grow into fresh {+218}Po sample. 
T$from |a decay; weighted average of 1982Va09 (3.11 min {I2}) and 1986Po17 (3.093 min {I12}). Other: 3.05 min (1931Cu01 evaluation). 
$RMS nuclear charge radius relative to that of {+210}Po: |d|4r{+2}|5({+218}Po,{+210}Po)=+0.958 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I7}(syst) (2011Co01,2012Co24) 
$RMS nuclear charge radius relative to that of {+210}Po: |d|4r{+2}|5({+218}Po,{+210}Po)=+0.948 fm{+2} {I10}(stat) {I7}(syst) (2015Fi07) 


