# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$714.75 {I15} (1994Wu01), 714.59 {I14} (2019Ma70) 
$R(DCO)=0.69 {I5}, A{-p}=-0.01 {I5} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=-0.009 {I49}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I60} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.10 {I+17-20} or -6.9 {I42-|@} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=0.20 {I4} (1978We08) 
MR$-4.3 {I+12-26} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.72 {I1}, A{-p}=0.01 {I2} (2019Ma70) 
$1061.38 {I6} (1994Wu01), 1061.20 {I13} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$888.69 {I13} (1994Wu01), 888.53 {I13} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=-0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I3} (1978We08) 
MR$-3.1 {I+13-|@} or >7 (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.77 {I20}, A{-p}=-0.02 {I1} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.081 {I2} (1965Ej01) 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I9} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.078 {I16} (1978We08) 
MR$0.00 {I22} (1978We08) 
EKC$0.0124 {I21} (1974Go30) 
$R(DCO)=1.013 {I20}, A{-p}=0.13 {I10} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.43 {I6}, A{-4}=0.049 {I48} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.070 {I71} (1978We08) 
$A{-2}=-0.246 {I50}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I63}, A{-p}=0.254 {I120} (1982Da12) 
MR$-0.035 {I+84-49} (1982Da12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.099 {I25} (1978We08) 
MR$0.00 {I5} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.00 {I10}, A{-p}=0.16 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp > |a(K)(M1) > |a(K)(M1+E2) > |a(K)(E2) signals E0 component 
EKC$0.053 {I7} (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=0.040 {I82}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I11} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.69 {I+12-14} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$378.4 {I2} (1994Wu01), 378.04 {I14} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=0.38 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I4} (1978We08) 
MR$-0.026 {I+48-44} (1978We08) 
$A{-p}=0.24 {I4} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$665.86 {I14} (1994Wu01), 665.78 {I14} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=0.30 {I8} (1978We08) 
MR$-3.17 {I+67-99} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.92 {I4}, A{-p}=-0.11 {I3} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$1092.46 {I6} (1994Wu01), 1092.58 {I13} (2019Ma70) 
$A{-2}=-0.61 {I4}, A{-4}=0.26 {I3} (1978We08) 
MR$-2.71 {I+46-61} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=0.53 {I2}, A{-p}=0.06 {I3} (2019Ma70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(141.18) and I|g(479.07)/I|g(141.18)=0.46~{I8} (1994Wu01) 
$A{-2}=-0.39 {I8}, A{-4}=0.067 {I94} (1978We08) 
MR$-2.3 {I+23-65} or -0.26 {I+31-967} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Value may include I|g of 546.7|g from 1911 level. 
EKC$0.0091 {I16} (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=+0.50 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I12} (1972Re04) 
$A{-2}=0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I3} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.01 {I15}, A{-p}=0.14 {I10} (2011Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$0.0220 {I45}, for 437.82|g+436.73|g (1974Go30) 
$A{-2}=0.39 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.093 {I46} (1978We08) 
MR$0.022 {I+81-76} (1978We08) 
$R(DCO)=1.01 {I10} (2011Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(556)/I|g(437)=0.09~{I3} (1973Wa33). 
M$|a(K)exp > |a(K)(M1) > |a(K)(M1+E2) > |a(K)(E2) signals E0 component 
EKC$0.046 {I12} (1974Go30) 
$R(DCO)=0.86 {I5}, A{-p}=-0.01 {I5} (2011Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Value is for I|g(172.0+172.1). 
$A{-2}=0.97 {I4}, A{-4}=0.006 {I54} (1978We08) 
MR$0.543 {I+100-7} and -0.394 {I+59-72} (1978We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(427.0+427.8)=52.4~{I26}; from intensity balances, most of this intensity depopulates the 1144 level. 
$R(DCO)=1.00 {I1} (2011Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2,M1)
decay_comment:
RI$For the doublet, I|g=5.1~{I2}. Evaluator deduced split in intensity from I|g(533)/I|g(845)=0.012~{I4} from {+154}Gd Adopted |g radiations. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Originally placed from this level and a 1698 level by 1996SpZZ, but 2004Ku13 do not confirm this latter level. Also, peak contains a contribution from a {+153}Gd impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$Evaluator's decomposition of doublet with I|g=5.1~{I2}, based I|g(533)/I|g(800)=0.194 from {+154}Gd Adopted |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
RI$From branching in {+154}Gd Adopted Levels, Gammas, I|g=9.3~{I12} is expected, so |g is probably a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$As placed, this |g feeds a 1790 level. However, from the {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay, that level is actually at 1788~keV. The evaluator concludes that the placement of this |g is questionable. It is not included in the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Doubly placed by 1996SpZZ, but the level (1861.55) associated with the other placement has been shown (by 2004Ku13 in {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay) not to exist. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From {+154}Eu |b{+-} decay 
CC$Theoretical value since |a(K)exp indicates negligible E0 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Placement is that of 2003Ku19. This |g was placed from |a 3517 level by 1975So03, but the implied final level at 3032 was not assigned to this activity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Value is from 2001KuZS. Placement and I|g value are from J.L. Wood (private communication, April, 2008). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$654+650 doublet (2017Al11, in Fig. 9 of |g ray spectra there is a single peak for 654|g from 1650 level and 650|g from 1646 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 0.197 {I17} (1986Sc25), 0.198 {I8} (1967Fo11), 0.165 {I15} (1967Ko12), 0.207 {I12} (1967Ha24), all by subshell ratios, and -0.19 {I3} (1975Kr0, |g|g(|q)), -0.228 {I80} (1966As02,|g(|q)), -0.20 {I3} (1961Su13, |g|g(|q)). Sign adopted from |g|g(|q) (values from subshell ratios are unsigned). Subshell ratios: K/L1=6.81 {I36}, L1/L1=1.000 {I4}, L2/L1=0.295 {I13}, L3/L1=0.249 {I12} (1967Fo11); L1/L1=1.0 {I1}, L2/L1=0.277 {I28}, L3/L1=0.239 {I24}, M1/L1=0.196 {I20}, M2/L1=0.047 {I5}, M3/L1=0.047 {I5}, N/L1=0.044 {I4} (1967Ko12, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor); L1/L1=1.00 {I10}, L2/L1=0.276 {I28}, L3/L1=0.248 {I25}, M/L1=0.310 {I31}, N/L1=0.114 {I11} (1962Ha24, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor); 1986Sc25: no subshell values listed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 0.293 {I12} (1990GoZS), 0.274 {I4} (1975Ch04), 0.260 {I9} (1967Fo11), 0.283 {I17} (1962Ha24), all by subshell ratios, and +0.26 {I3} (1975Kr04, |g|g(|q)). Sign adopted from |g|g(|q) (values from subshell ratios are unsigned). Subshell ratios: L1/L1=1.000 {I74}, L2/L1=3.741 {I148}, L3/L1=5.185 {I222}, M1/L1=0.444 {I74}, M2/L1=1.593 {I148}, M3/L1=2.259 {I148}, N1/L1=0.815 {I222}, N2/L1=0.815 {I222} (1990GoZS); L1/L1=1.000 {I45}, L2/L1=3.605 {I60}, L3/L1=5.000 {I70} (1975Ch04); L1/L1=1.000 {I119}, L2/L1=3.349 {I218}, L3/L1=4.391 {I263} (1967Fo11); L1/L1=1.00 {I10}, L2/L1=3.30 {I33}, L3/L1=4.50 {I45}, M/L1=3.20 {I32}, N/L1=0.750 {I75} (1962Ha24, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR 1975Kr04 report |d=-0.035 {I25} for this transition. This leads to B(M2)(W.u.)>13, which exceeds RUL of 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$calculated by evaluator from subshell ratios L1/L1=1.0 {I1}, L2/L1=0.28 {I14}, L3/L1=0.27 {I12} (1975Ch04). Other value: 0.017 {I+5-8} from subshell ratios L1/L1=1.00, L2/L1=0.237 {I44}, L3/L1=0.062 {I23}, M/L=0.180 {I45}, M2/M1=0.153 {I139}, M3/M1=0.152 {I139} (1968Ba80, superseding 1967Fo11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 0.163 {I23} (1986Sc25, from subshell ratios, values not given), 0.19 {I4} (1975Kr04, |g|g(|q)), -0.227 {I35} (1966As02,|g(|q)), -0.188 {I57} (1959De29, |g(|q)). Sign adopted from |g|g(|q) (value subshell ratios are unsigned). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$unc from |e decay dataset 
M,MR$from |e decay dataset 
MR from {+155}Tb |e decay. From (n,|g), |d=0.40 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI,M$from |e decay dataset 
MR from {+155}Tb |e decay. From (n,|g), %E2=45 {I9}, which leads to |d=0.90 {I+18-15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$from Coulomb excitation dataset 
CC |d not known. Value included to obtain a reasonable estimate for B(E2)(W.u.) and B(E1)(W.u.) for the other two deexciting |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,|a3n|g),({+9}Be,4n|g) dataset 
RI 1970Lo04, (|a,3n|g), report I|g=34 
M,MR from 1970Lo04 (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$60.00 {I2} (1959Ha07), 59.97 {I20} (1967Fo11), 60.006 {I4} (1970Re08), 60.0100 {I18} (1970Ra37), 60.01 {I4} (1975Kr04), 60.012 {I3} (1976Me10), 60.008 {I2} (1986Sc25), 60.022 {I15}, (1990Me15), 60.0086 {I10} (1990GoZS); other: 60.019 {I15} (1969Me09) 
RI$3.8 {I2} (1968Al01), 4.3 {I3} (1970Re08), 3.9 {I9} (1971Ge11), 3.8 {I4} (1975Kr04), 3.60 {I10} (1990Me15), 3.99 {I12} (1994Eg01), 3.9 {I9} (1996Ch27); others: 4.0 (1959Ha07), 5.1 {I20} (1967Bl11), 3.60 {I8} (1969Me09) 
MR$calculated by evaluator for this dataset: 0.198 {I8} from K/L1=6.81 {I36}, L1/L1=1.000 {I4}, L2/L1=0.295 {I13}, L3/L1=0.249 {I12} (1967Fo11); -0.19 {I3} (1975Kr0, |g|g(|q)), -0.20 {I3} (1961Su13, |g|g(|q)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$26.49 {I5} (1975Kr04), 26.530 {I23} (1986Sc25), 26.532 {I21} (1990Me15); other: 26.513 {I21} (1969Me09) 
RI$1.00 {I10} (1971Ge11), 1.10 {I13} (197Kr04), 1.03 {I6} (1990Me15); others: |? 4 (1959Ha07), |? 1 (1968Al01), 26.513 {I21} (1969Me09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$86.54 {I1} (1959Ha07), 86.52 {I20} (1967Fo11), 86.541 {I3} (1970Re08), 86.5452 {I33} (1970Ra37), 86.53 {I3} (1975Kr04), 86.547 {I1} (1986Sc25), 86.554 {I15} (1990Me15); other: 86.539 {I15} (1986Me09) 
RI$100 (1959Ha07), 100 (1967Bl11), 100 (1969Al01), 100 (1970Re08), 100 (1971Ge11), 100 (1975Kr04), 100 (1990Me15), 100 (1994Eg01), 100 (1996Ch26); other: 100 (1969Me09), 
M 1975Kr04 indicate |d(M2/E1)=0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$18.776 {I35} (1969Me09), 18.73 {I3} (1975Kr04), 18.769 {I15} (1976Ch04, from {+155}Tb |e decay), 18.760 {I4} (1986Sc25), 18.784 {I35} (1990Me15), 18.764 {I2} (1990G0ZS); others: 18.75 (1967Fo11) 
RI$0.17 {I3} (1971Ge11), 0.16 {I2} (1974HeYW), 0.13 {I3} (1975Kr04), 0.16 {I4} (1990Me15); others: |? 0.1 (1959Ha07), 0.16 {I4} (1969Me09) 
MR$calculated by evaluator for this dataset from subshell ratios: 0.293 {I12} from L1/L1=1.000 {I74}, L2/L1=3.741 {I148}, L3/L1=5.185 {I222}, M1/L1=0.444 {I74}, M2/L1=1.593 {I148}, M3/L1=2.259 {I148}, N1/L1=0.815 {I222}, N2/L1=0.815 {I222} (1990GoZS); 0.260 {I9} from L1/L1=1.000 {I119}, L2/L1=3.349 {I218}, L3/L1=4.391 {I263} (1967Fo11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$45.29 {I1} (1957Bo15), 45.299 {I2} (1970Re08), 45.2972 {I13} (1970Ra37), 45.27 {I5} (1975Kr04), 45.300 {I1} (1986Sc26), 45.295 {I13} (1990Me15); other: 45.299 {I13} (1969Me09) 
RI$3.6 {I7} (1970Re08), 4.1 {I3} (1971Ge11), 3.95 {I40} (1975Kr04), 3.95 {I40} (1975Kr04), 4.21 {I20} (1990Me15), 4.36 {I12} (194Eg01), 4.3 {I10} (1996Ch27); others: 2.3 (1959Ha07), 2.8 {I7} (1968Al01), 4.18 {I19} (1969Me09) 
MR from |g|g(|q), 1975Kr04 report |d=-0.035 {I25}. From the T{-1/2} value for this level and its |g+ce branching, this |d value implies B(M2)(W.u.)>13, which exceeds RUL of 1. For B(M2)(W.u.)|<1, |d|<0.0027. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$105.32 {I3} (1957Bo15), 105.28 {I20} (1967Fo11), 105.302 {I4} (1970Re08), 105.308 {I3} (1970Ra37), 105.30 {I3} (1975Kr04), 105.309 {I1} (1986Sc25), 105.338 {I15} (1990Me15); other: 105.315 {I15} (1969Me09) 
RI$65.7 {I65} (1967Bl11), 67.9 {I35} (1968Al01), 68.3 {I27} (1970Re08), 68 {I4} (1971Ge11), 69.9 {I35} (1975Kr04), 69.1 {I9} (1982Co05), 66.8 {I27} (1990Me15), 68.5 {I14} (1994Eg01), 69.5 {I16} (1996Ch27); other: 64 (1959Ha07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$21.02 {I2} (1967Fo11), 21.030 {I10} (1986Sc25), 21.036 {I4} (1990GoZS) 
RI$calculated by evaluator relative to I(86.5|g)=100 using internal conversion electron intensities (1967Fo11, Table 3, p. 865) and theoretical internal coefficient values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$adopted value 
RI$calculated by evaluator from intensity balance at 107.6 level 
MR$0.017 {I+5-8} calculated by evaluator for this dataset from subshell ratios L1/L1=1.00, L2/L1=0.237 {I44}, L3/L1=0.062 {I23}, M/L=0.180 {I45}, M2/M1=0.153 {I139}, M3/M1=0.152 {I139} (1968Ba80, superseding 1967Fo11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$31.55 {I10} (1970Re08), 31.444 {I7} (1986Sc25), 31.4 {I1} (1990GoZS); other: 31.4 (1) (1969Me09) 
RI$0.03 {I2} (1970Re08), 0.023 {I5} (1990Me15); other: 0.023 {I5} (1969Me09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$57.970 {I26} (1970Re08), 57.9805 {I20} (1970Ra37), 57.99 {I4} (1975Kr04), 57.989 {I1} (1986Sc25), 57.986 {I30} (1990Me15); other: 57.983 {I30} (1969Me09) 
RI$0.20 {I3} (1968Al01), 0.22 {I5} (1970Re08), 0.22 {I3} (1975Kr04), 0.221 {I18} (1990Me15), 0.213 {I30} (1994Eg01); other: 0.217 {I18} (1969Me09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$86.01 {I20} (1967Fo11), 86.062 {I23} (1970Re08), 86.062 {I5} (1970Ra37), 86.03 {I7} (1975Kr04), 86.059 {I1} (1986Sc25); other: 86.0 (1969Me05) 
RI$0.50 {I5} (1968Al01), 0.49 {I5} (1970Re08), 0.54 {I11} (1975Kr04) 
MR$0.19 {I4} (1975Kr04, |g|g(|q)) for this dataset. Since the |d values for the other |DJ=1 transitions in the g.s. band are found (1992Ku15, 1998St28) to be negative, the evaluator has assumed that the sign of this one is negative also. This is confirmed by the negative adopted from |g|g(|q) (1959De29, Coulomb Ex. dataset) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$146.061 {I5} (1970Re08), 146.04 {I10} (1974Kr04), 146.071 {I1} (1986Sc25), 146.090 {I90} (1990Me15) 
RI$0.16 {I5} (1967Bl11), 0.19 {I2} (1970Re08), 0.14 {I2} (1975Kr04), 0.167 {I10} (1990Me15); other: 0.169 {I9} (1969Me09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E computed from level-energy difference 
M from the measured I|g values for the 14 and 86 |g's and from theoretical conversion coefficients, 1970Bo02 conclude that mult=E1 for the 14|g, since any other choice of mult would lead to a I(|g+ce)(14|g) value at least five times as large as that of I(|g+ce)(86|g). 
CC listed uncertainty takes into account only the uncertainty in the E|g value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$adopted value. Values calculated by evaluator for this dataset: 0.165 {I15} from L1/L1=1.0 {I1}, L2/L1=0.277 {I28}, L3/L1=0.239 {I24}, M1/L1=0.196 {I20}, M2/L1=0.047 {I5}, M3/L1=0.047 {I5}, N/L1=0.044 {I4} (1967Ko12, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor); 0.207 {I12} (1967Ha24) from L1/L1=1.00 {I10}, L2/L1=0.276 {I28}, L3/L1=0.248 {I25}, M/L1=0.310 {I31}, N/L1=0.114 {I11} (1962Ha24, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$adopted value. Values calculated by evaluator for this dataset: 0.274 {I4} from L1/L1=1.000 {I45}, L2/L1=3.605 {I60}, L3/L1=5.000 {I70} (1975Ch04); 0.283 {I17} from L1/L1=1.00 {I10}, L2/L1=3.30 {I33}, L3/L1=4.50 {I45}, M/L1=3.20 {I32}, N/L1=0.750 {I75} (1962Ha24, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1975Ch04 
RI calculated from listed I(|g+ce) and |a(E2) 
TI estimated from I|g(18.77|g) and Ice ratio from 1962Ha24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1975Ch04 
RI calculated from I|g(57.98|g) and the ratio I|g(10.4|g)/I|g(57.98|g) determined in {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay. 1976Me10 report I(|g+ce)|?183, deduced from ce(10.4|g)/ce(31.4|g), as determined in {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay, and I(|g+ce)(31.4|g). This leads to I|g(10.4|g)|?0.5 in agreement with the listed value. 
MR$adopted value, calculated by evaluator from subshell ratios L1/L1=1.0 {I1}, L2/L1=0.28 {I14}, L3/L1=0.27 {I12} (1975Ch04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(57|g) and ratio I|g(31|g)/I|g(57|g) measured in {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay (1969Me09) 
MR$adopted value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1962Ha24 
RI from 1969Ga28. Other: |?0.7, from Ice(K)|?2 (1976Me10). Note, however, that this value is much smaller than expected from, e.g., the {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay. From that decay, I|g would be expected to be |?5.9. Note that the very strong 86.55 |g may have influenced the value deduced for I|g(86.0 |g) in the {+155}Tb |e decay. 
MR$adopted value. 0.19 {I4} (1975Kr04, |g|g(|q)) for this dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -0.14 {I1} (1996KrZZ) and -0.12 {I2} (1975Wa01). 1976Me10 report |d=0.14 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -0.215 {I14} (1975Wa01), -0.188 {I+16-22} (1980Bu27),and -0.24 {I2} (1996KrZZ). 1976Me10 list |d=0.18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E 1976Me10 suggest that this peak may be a doublet. However, from the |g branching from this level as observed in (n,|g), the I|g value computed for this |g is 1.04 {I16}, reasonably close to that seen here. From I|g considerations, then, this peak is probably not a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator using I|g(367.3|g)/I|g(262.7|g) from the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(262.2|g), with the result then scaled up so that the summed |g intensity for the two placements equals 90, the value (92.3 {I8}) given by 1976Me10 for their 367.36 |g, after removal of the contribution (2.0) of a 367.9 |g seen in (n,|g) but not reported by 1976Me10 (see comment on the 367.9 |g from the 454.4 level). Note that the split reported by these authors (|?37) agrees well with that given here, but they associate it with the other placement (out of the 427.2 level) of this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
E from 1967Ko12 
RI from I|g(59.6|g)/I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g) as given in the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set and from I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g) reported here, one computes I|g(59.6|g)=1.1 {I4}. 1976Me10 give I|g(59.6|g)<1. The listed value represents a reasonable combination of these two. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator using I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g)/I|g(367.2|g) from the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g), with the result then scaled up so that the summed |g intensity for the two placements equals 90, the value (92.3 {I8}) given by 1976Me10 for their 367.36 |g, after removal of the contribution (2.0) of a 367.9 |g seen in (n,|g) but not reported by 1976Me10 (see comment on the 367.9 |g from the 454.4 level). Note that the split reported by these authors (|?57) agrees well with that given here, but they associate it with the other placement (from the 367.3 level) of this |g. 
MR 1996KrZZ report |d=-0.03 {I5}. 1976Me10 report |d|?0.04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI calculated using I|g(129.3|g)/I|g(450.5|g) from the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(450.6|g). 1976Me10 report I|g=0.25 {I15} for this |g and suggest two possible placements for it. One of these is from this level and the other is out of a 721.06 level. However, a 721.06 level now is not believed to be populated in the {+155}Tb decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Shown as unplaced by 1976Me10 and having I|g|<0.05. However, in (n,|g) a 304.53 |g with I|g=0.020 {I3} (on this intensity scale) is is found to deexcite this level. 
RI calculated using I|g(304.5|g)/I|g(450.5|g) from the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(450.6|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Reported by 1976Me10 to deexcite a 346.06 level. 
M from the adopted values. 1976Me10 report mult=(E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Shown unplaced by 1976Me10 
M from 1986Sc25,(n,|g). From |a(K)exp=0.023 {I5}, 1976Me10 give mult=E1+M2 or E2?. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1986Sc25, (n,|g) 
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(454.45|g) and the |g branching out of this level, as reported by 1986Sc25. Note that this is only |?2% of the intensity of the 367.35 peak, as reported by 1976Me10, and was not separately indicated by them. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E from 1980Ab20 
RI photons not observed by 1976Me10, who report I(|g+ce)|?1. Listed value computed by the evaluator from I(|g+ce) and the listed |a value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI |g shown doubly placed by 1976Me10. From the |g branching out of this level as observed in (n,|g) (1986Sc25), however, one computes I|g=9.02 for this |g. The evaluator has thus concluded that all the intensity (9.07) reported by 1976Me10 for this |g is associated with the deexcitation of this level. 
MR from 1996KrZZ. 1976Me10 report |d<0.33. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
1976Me10 report Ice(K)|?0.11 
E,M from 1986Sc25, (n,|g) 
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(501.7|g+529.7|g) and the |g branching out of this level as reported by 1986Sc25. This |g is shown unplaced by 1976Me10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E nominal value from Adopted Values. 1999HuZY report E|g=86.6 on their level scheme, but this may be a misprint. Value may be affected by the presence of the very strong 86.6 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR other: 0.26 {I4}, deduced from relative intensities of the deexciting cascade and crossover |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI peak contains a contribution from a {+156}Gd line. This contribution is not included in the listed I|g value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M from a linear polarization measurement, 2003Le20 report that this |g is a magnetic, rather than an electric, multipole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR other: 0.24 {I4}, deduced from relative intensities of the deexciting cascade and crossover |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference. 1986Sc25 give E|g=10.423 {I3} for this |g and state that it is from 1975Ch04. 1975Ch04, however, report E|g=10.489 {I38} 
MR$adopted value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EL2C$15 {I10} (1986Sc25) 
MR$adopted value, calculated by evaluator from |a(L2)exp=15 {I10} (1986Sc25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g shown unplaced by 1986Sc25. The evaluator has placed this transition here, based on the deexcitation of this level as observed in the {+155}Tb decay (1976Me10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
EKC$2.3 {I11} (1986Sc25) 
M from |a(K)exp=2.3 {I11} (1986Sc25), mult=M1,E2 rather than mult=E1+M2, since, for this latter case, |d would be |?0.4. This is too large for such a low-energy transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
EKC$<0.06 {I3} (1986Sc25) 
M note that the listed mult is not consistent with the proposed placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$0.18 {I4} (1986Sc25) 
M |a(K)exp=0.18 {I4} is somewhat larger than the |a(K) values for M1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
EKC$0.038 {I14} (1986Sc25) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.038 {I14}, mult=M1+E2. Placement in level scheme, however, indicates |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
EKC$0.013 {I5} (1986Sc25) 
M |a(K)exp=0.013 {I5} for this doubly placed transition suggests that mult cannot be E1 for both placements. Since the other placement is consistent with E1, this argument would suggest that J|p is not 7/2- for this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
EKC$<0.013 (1986Sc25) 
M |a(K)exp<0.013 (compared with |a(K)=0.0063 for E1 and |a(K)=0.0191 for E2) suggests mult=E1. The placement in the level scheme, however, requires |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
EKC$<0.006 (1986Sc25) 
M placement requires no change in parity. Note that the mult is shown as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
EKC$<0.3 (1986Sc25) 
M placement requires no change in parity. Note that the mult is shown as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
EKC$0.15 {I5} (1986Sc25) 
M |a(K)exp=0.15 {I5} allows mult=E1 or E2. From the level scheme, |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E 1992Ku15 report E|g=140.0 {I1} 
M,MR$mult from 1992Ku15 and 1998St28 with |d weighted average of -0.32 {I5} from (n,|g) dataset(1992Ku15) and -0.276 {I21} (1998St28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR |d from |g|g(|q) (1998St28). Mult established from necessity for a parity change in the transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
From |g branching considerations, it is tempting to associate this |g with the 364.0|g known to deexcite the 450.5 level. The energy fit implied by this placement does not seem to be particularly good, but, since the 422 level is not likely to be appreciably populated in Coul. ex., there does not appear to be any other place among the Coulomb-excited levels for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR simple average of -0.13 {I5} (1992Ku15) and -0.39 {I5} (1998St28). Uncertainty chosen to overlap the two values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From: |a(K)exp=1.6~{I+5-3} (1970Fu06, |e decay), 1.43~{I4} (1974Kl09, |b{+-} decay), 1.40~{I5} (1982Ba28, (n,|g)); |a(L1)exp=0.24~{I4} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)); L-subshell ratios: (1962Ew01,1964Pe17,1967Ge07,1981Bu24), from |b{+-} decay; (1970Fu06,1970Pe10), from |e decay; and 1981Ko03, from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From: |a(K)exp=0.15 (1970Pe10, |e decay), 0.134~{I10} (1974Kl09, |b{+-} decay), 0.20~{I4} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)), 0.157~{I14} (1982Ba28, (n,|g)), 0.147~{I14} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)); L-subshell ratios (1962Ew01,1964Pe17) from |b{+-} decay; (1970Fu06,1970Pe10) from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From: |a(K)exp=0.043 (1970Pe10, |e decay), 0.0479~{I24} (1982Ba28, (n,|g)) and 0.0472~{I23} (1993Kl03,(n,|g)); L-subshell ratios (1970Fu06, |e decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From: |a(K)exp=0.038~{I10} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)), 0.018~{I4} (1982Ba28, (n,|g)) and 0.00221~{I19} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)); |g(|q) (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0045~{I24} from (|a,2n|g), where the |g may be a singlet, and 0.00259~{I20} from (n,|g) (1993Kl03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=42~{I21}. 
M$|a(K)exp>0.39 (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay), >0.10 (1982Ba28, (n,|g)), and >0.014 for the 1049+1051 |g's (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)). 
TI$From |b{+-} decay. From (n,|g), I(|g+ce)=0.61~{I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029~{I+8-4} (1970Fu06) and 0.0033~{I8} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.0030~{I5} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); 0.0031~{I3} (1982Ba28) and 0.0032~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=54~{I4}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0118~{I13} (1971Mc01) and 0.0124~{I8} (1972Ha29), from |e decay; 0.0126~{I10} (1974Kl09) and 0.0113~{I10} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.014~{I3} (1981Ko03), from (|a,2n|g); 0.0119~{I8} (1982Ba28) and 0.0110~{I7} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q) (1972Ha17), |b{+-} decay. Others: |d=11 {I+7-3} (1981Mc06), Coul. ex.; |d>200 (1973HaWB) and <-18 (1977Co22), from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay. 
CC From |a(K)exp|*(|a/|a(K)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018~{I+8-4} (1970Fu06), |e decay 0.00157~{I19} (1982Ba28) and 0.00197~{I15} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035~{I7} (1971Mc01, |e decay); 0.0037~{I7} (1974Kl09) and 0.0040~{I13} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00272~{I16} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0026~{I9} (1964Pe17), 0.0022~{I3} (1966Dz08), 0.00236~{I18} (1974Kl09) and 0.0020~{I2} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.0022~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06), 0.0019~{I3} (1970Pe10), 0.00207~{I20} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.0025~{I9} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.00220~{I20} (1982Ba28), 0.00219~{I13} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR$From |g|g(|q): -18~{I3} (1972Ha17, |b{+-} decay), -20~{I4} (1981Mc06, Coul. ex.). From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in |e decay: -6.5~{I+26-79} (1975Ul01, 1983Li06). Others: +18~{I+17-6} (1970Ru09), <-11 (1977Co22), from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; -33~{I+27-99} or >4.8 and -7.0~{I+16-99} or >+7.9 (1967Ke15), from |g|g(|q) in |e decay. 
MR Sign convention of 1970Ru09 not ascertained. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00175~{I+23-18} (1970Fu06), 0.0019~{I3} (1970Pe10), 0.00165~{I16} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.00155~{I20} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.00192~{I15} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0016~{I4} (1964Pe17), 0.0017~{I2} (1966Dz08), 0.00201~{I16} (1974Kl09), 0.00208~{I17} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.0020~{I2} (1982Ba28), 0.00215~{I17} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=1.2~{I+19-6}. 
M$|a(K)exp>0.22 (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); ce data from 1982Ba28, (n,|g). 
TI$From {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay. From (n,|g), I(|g+ce)=0.072~{I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00053~{I13} (1964Pe17), 0.00088 (1966Dz08), 0.00082~{I12} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay. 
MR$0.01~{I+2-1} (1977Co22), <0.022 (1972Ha17), from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.) value computed directly from the empirical B(E1)|^ from (|g,|g'). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00071~{I+6-3} (1970Fu06, |e decay); 0.00063~{I5} (1974Kl09), 0.00065~{I5} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.00064~{I7} (1982Ba28), 0.00063~{I5}, from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0030~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06), 0.00254~{I27} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.0045~{I24} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); 0.00265~{I23} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)). 
MR From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in |e decay (1975Ul01). Others: 0.26|<|d|<7.44 (1967Ke15) and -19 {I19} (1979Ri17), in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0017~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06), 0.0022~{I9} (1970Pe10), 0.00169~{I18} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.0023~{I3} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); 0.00171~{I15} (1982Ba28), 0.00178~{I10} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR$From 1975Ul01, |e decay. Others: -8.6 {I+23-48} (1979Ri17) and -8 {I+4-62} and +32 {I+99-27} or |<-9.7 (1967Ke15), from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0037~{I10} (1972Ha29, |e decay); 0.0029~{I4} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); and 0.00230~{I21} (1982Ba28), 0.00240~{I14} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q), |d(E2/M1)>8.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$See the comment on this |g in the {+155}Gd(n,|g) E=th data set. 
CC From |a(K)exp|*(|a/|a(K)). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0017~{I4} (1966Dz08), 0.0024~{I4} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.0038~{I9} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.0028~{I3} (1982Ba28), 0.00272~{I19} (1993Kl03, from (n,|g)). |a(K)exp values are given in (|a,2n|g) and in (n,|g) (1982Ba28) but this |g is reported to be multiply placed in these studies. 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (1977Co22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023~{I10} (1972Ha29, |e decay); 0.0015~{I8} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); and 0.00148~{I23} (1982Ba28), 0.00145~{I10} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0008~{I3} (1971Mc01, |e decay); and 0.00088~{I10} (1982Ba28), 0.00096~{I7} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Other: 0.0034~{I17} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)), which implies M1, E2, or a multiplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0011~{I+7-4} (1970Fu06), 0.00088~{I18} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; and 0.00075~{I8} (1982Ba28, 1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q) |d=-0.08 {I3} (1975Ul01), |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2,M1
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=50~{I+25-16}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.016~{I4} (1971Mc01, |e decay); 0.016~{I3} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.0135~{I12} (1982Ba28), 0.0168~{I16} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
CC From |a(K)exp|*(|a/|a(K)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I3} (1982Ba28), 0.00159 {I10} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I10} (1981Ko03), in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00049~{I8} (1964Pe17), 0.00060~{I7} (1966Dz08), 0.00068~{I5} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; 0.00083~{I+5-3} (1970Fu06), 0.00050~{I12} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; and 0.00060~{I5} (1982Ba28), 0.00059~{I4} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q) |d=0.018 {I+10-18} (1972Ha17) and <0.04 (1977Co22), from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Placement and strength of this transition has implications for assessing E2-transition strengths between |g and |b bands. (Comment to the evaluator from J. L. Wood, July, 2011.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00185~{I+25-18} (1970Fu06), 0.0020~{I3} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.0021~{I5} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.00193~{I23} (1982Ba28), 0.00206~{I14} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) (1975Ul01,1983Li06), |e decay. Other: from |g|g(|q) |d=+10 {I+99-7} or <- 5.5 (1967Ke15), |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0014~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06), 0.0014~{I4} (1971Mc01), 0.00172~{I12} (1972Ha29), from |e decay; and 0.00137~{I23} (1982Ba28), 0.00140~{I10} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q) |d(M3/E2)=-0.12 {I+22-28}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00050~{I8} (1966Dz08), 0.00056~{I5} (1974Kl09), 0.00057~{I21} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00061~{I7} (1982Ba28), 0.00060~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay, |d=-0.01 {I1} (1972Ha17) and <0.025 (1977Co22), so transition can be pure E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00053~{I11} (1966Dz08), 0.00055~{I7} (1974Kl09), 0.0007~{I4} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00070~{I8} (1982Ba28), 0.00054~{I4} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00037~{I15} (1982Ba28) and 0.00083~{I8} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g); and 0.00075~{I14}, for the (1119.9+1120.8) doublet (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)), with both |g's assigned E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(L1)exp=0.033~{I5}, 1993Kl03 in (n,|g) list mult=E1?, but placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2,E0)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0032~{I5} (1972Ha29, |e decay); 0.0026~{I13} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.0023~{I3} (1982Ba28), 0.00250 (22) (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
CC From |a(K)exp|*(|a/|a(K)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00067~{I11} (1982Ba28), 0.00074~{I7} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Other: 0.0023~{I8} (1972Ha29, |e decay), which implies M1,E2 rather than E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048~{I25} (1972Ha29, |e decay); 0.0030~{I7} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.0024~{I5} (1982Ba28), 0.00268~{I13} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020~{I2} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.0014~{I4} (1982Ba28), 0.00168~{I13} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |d>7 (1981Ko03). The evaluator assumes that this is |d(E2/M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.477~{I+22-17} (1970Fu06), 0.49 (1970Pe10), from |e decay; and 0.49~{I5} (1982Ba28), 0.505~{I45} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). L-subshell ratios in |e decay (1970Fu06,1970Pe10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0673~{I20} (1970Fu06), 0.068 (1970Pe10), from |e decay; 0.066~{I5} (1982Ba28), 0.069~{I4} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). L-subshell ratios in |e decay (1970Fu06,1970Pe10). 
MR From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q), |d=+9.2 {I+7-6} (1975Ul01) and from |g(|q), |d=+7.6 {I+6-5} (1979Ri17) in |e decay. Other: from |g|g(|q), |d=22 {I+99-17} or <-12.7 (1967Ke15), in |e decay. From ce data in |e decay, |>7.0 (1971Fu12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0285~{I20} (1970Fu06), 0.022 (1970Pe10), from |e decay; 0.030~{I2} (1982Ba28), 0.0252~{I17} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). L-subshell ratios in |e decay (1970Fu06,1970Pe10). 
MR From |g(|q) in |e decay, |d(M3/E2)=+0.014 {I12} (1975Ul01) and -0.029 {I23} (1979Ri17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0224~{I20} (1970Fu06, |e decay); and 0.021~{I5} (1982Ba28), and 0.0241~{I21} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Also, L-subshell ratios in |e decay (1970Fu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00215~{I21} (1970Fu06), 0.0034~{I10} (1970Pe10), 0.0025~{I3} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; and 0.0027~{I6} (1982Ba28), 0.00284~{I17} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR$From |g(|q) in |e decay, 1975Ul01 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.068~{I6}. However, this value leads to an M3 transition probability that is larger than that allowed by RUL. This |d value is not adopted. Other: from |g(|q) in |e decay, |d=0.10~{I9} (1979Ri17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00187~{I20} (1970Fu06), 0.0013~{I2} (1970Pe10), 0.00174~{I13} (1971Mc01), 0.00181~{I6} (1972Ha29), from |e decay; and 0.00168~{I20} (1982Ba28), 0.00191~{I15} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From L-subshell ratios |d=1.39 {I+30-22} (1970Fu06); |g(|q), |g|g(|q), and |gce(|q) -2.07 {I+13-14} (1975Ul01), and |g(|q) -1.70 {I+16-21} (1979Ri17). Others: from |g|g(|q) -2.3 {I+8-27} (1959Of11), 2.1 {I4} (1967Ke15), and 1.83 {I10} (1968We17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0011 (1959Of11), 0.0014~{I3} (1970Pe10), 0.00122~{I6} (1972Ha29), from |e decay; and 0.00120~{I14} (1982Ba28), 0.00117~{I11} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q) in |e decay, |d(M3/E2)=+0.014 {I12} (1975Ul01) and +0.002 {I26} (1979Ri17), so transition may be pure E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0010~{I7} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.00070~{I9} (1982Ba28), 0.00075~{I6} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020~{I8} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); 0.0084~{I15} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). |a(K)exp is larger than that for M1, suggesting an E0 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0013~{I3} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); 0.00077~{I23} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Note: 1993Kl03 assign mult=E1(E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.50~{I+21-17} (1970Fu06, |e decay) and 1.34~{I21} (1982Ba28, (n,|g)). |a(L1)exp=0.186~{I18} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)). L-subshell ratios in |e decay (1970Fu06,1970Pe10). 
MR$From ce data, |d=0.297~{I6} (1970Fu06, |e decay) and 0.285 (1982Ba28, (n,|g)). From |g|g(|q),|d=+0.15~{I+10-9} (1975Ul01, |e decay). From |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |d=0.32~{I+13-90} (1981Ko03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.06~{I4} (1982Ba28), 0.057~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Also, L-subshell ratios in |e decay (1970Fu06). 
MR From ce data in |e decay, |d>14.4 (1971Fu12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I+5-3} (1970Fu06), 0.0023 {I3} (1971Mc01), and 0.00227 {I17} (1972Ha29) from |e decay. 
MR From |g|g(|q) in |e decay (1975Ul01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0015~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06, |e decay); 0.0007~{I2} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); and 0.015~{I3} (1982Ba28), 0.00113~{I8} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) |d=-3.8 {I2} (1975Ul01) and -3.4 +5-6 (1979Ri17). Other: from |g|g(|q) |d=3.4 {I+26-13} (1967Ke15). All are from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0014~{I7} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)); 0.0017~{I3} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)). 
MR From |g(|q), |d<-0.8 or >+2.5 (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)). Evaluator assumes this is |d(E2/M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.059~{I4}, 1993Kl03 deduce mult=E2. From |a(K)exp=0.23~{I9}, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=M1. Both are (n,|g) studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00075~{I14} for the (1119.9+1120.8) |g peak (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)) with both |g's assigned E1; 0.0036~{I10} (1993Kl03, (n,|g)), who assign mult=E1?. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048~{I10} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); and 0.0057~{I10} (1982Ba28), 0.0058~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=7~{I+6-3}. The uncertainty includes that due to the T{-1/2} value only; it does not take into account a 30% uncertainty in the I(|g+ce) value. 
M |a(K)exp>0.040 (1982Ba28), (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.012~{I4} (1982Ba28), 0.0112~{I9} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). This implies M1,E2, but the |g is doubly placed. This placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=9~{I+7-4}. 
M$|a(K)exp= >0.023 (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); 0.040~{I17} (1982Ba28), 0.0292~{I20} (1993Kl03) from (n,|g), but |g is doubly placed there. 
RI Measured value is <4, but |g must be E0. 
TI$See the comment in the (n,|g) data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Placement is that of 1993Kl03, (n,|g). |g not reported in (|a,2n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.061~{I7} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp=0.043~{I5} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). Authors list mult=(M1), but placement requires a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.014 {I4} (1982Ba28, (n,|g)). Authors suggest line is a doublet with this part being E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0014~{I5} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); and 0.00123~{I14} (1982Ba28), 0.00103~{I6} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.084~{I42} (1982Ba28), 0.089~{I12} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Authors report mult=M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.021~{I8} (1982Ba28), 0.011~{I2} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 1993Kl03 deduce mult=E2; 1982Ba28 deduce M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp<0.0062, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=E1. From |a(K)exp=0.0137~{I10}, 1993Kl03 deduce E2(+M1). (Both from (n,|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0022~{I3} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.00227~{I20} (1982Ba28), 0.00237~{I9} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0(+E2,M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.040~{I5} (1982Ba28), 0.0393~{I23} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). other: 0.012~{I3} (1972Ha29, |e decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From Coul. ex. 
M |a(K)exp(883.2+884.7) is interpreted by authors as E0+E2 for this |g and E2(+M1) for 884. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0073~{I7} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). From ce data, mult=E2+M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0009~{I3} (1982Ba28), 0.00040~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 1982Ba28 report mult=E2,M1. 1993Kl03 report mult=E1. This placement requires mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.026~{I7} (1993Kl03), in (n,|g). From ce data, mult=M1(+E2), but this placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0066~{I19} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.0062~{I14} (1982Ba28), 0.0044~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0027~{I4} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.00209~{I14} (1993Kl03), 0.0022~{I4} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0084~{I15} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1(+E2), but placement requires E2. Note that this |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q), |d=+0.29~{I11} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)) but |g is doubly placed. From data from other decay modes, the other |g is M1+E2, with |d=0.477~{I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp(943.9 doublet)=0.0025 {I3} (1981Ko03), (|a,2n|g); authors assign M1+E2 here and E1 for the other |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0061~{I7} (1993Kl03), and, for the composite peak, <0.0035 (1982Ba28), both from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g shown doubly placed by 1982Ba28, one being from this level. 1993Kl03 do not report this |g. Evaluator has shown it as unplaced in the (n,|g) data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0,M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0158~{I9} (1993Kl03), 0.015~{I4} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp|*(|a/|a(K)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0034~{I4} (1993Kl03), 0.006~{I4} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). Studies report mult=E2 or E2(M1), but |a(K)exp lies between E1 and E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0107~{I20} (1982Ba28), 0.0057~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Note that |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0,M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.075~{I7} (1993Kl03), 0.061~{I12} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). |a(K)exp is larger that that for M1. 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp|*(|a/|a(K)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0125~{I14} (1982Ba28), 0.0161~{I8} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). |g is doubly placed, but most of the intensity is associated with this placement. From |a(K)exp=0.0069~{I21} in |e decay, 1972Ha29 report mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0082~{I9}, with M1+E2 assignment (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.0129~{I12}, 0.0136~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g), with an M1 assignment. |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0077~{I12} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.0107~{I20} (1982Ba28), 0.0057~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). These latter authors report mult=E2. |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023~{I3} (1972Ha29), 0.0026~{I+8-4} (1970Fu06), from |e decay; and 0.00196~{I19} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0045~{I6} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.0037~{I10} (1982Ba28), 0.0054~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00150~{I20} (1970Fu06), 0.00128~{I19} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; and 0.0014~{I3} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q) |d=-0.024 {I8} (1975Ul01) and +0.048 {I21} (1979Ri17), from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0069~{I21} (1972Ha29, |e decay), where |g is singly placed. From |a(K)exp=0.0125~{I14} (1982Ba28), 0.0161~{I8} (1993Kl03), (n,|g), mult=M1. However, there it is doubly placed, with most of its intensity coming from the other 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00249~{I22} (1972Ha29), 0.0020~{I+4-3} (1970Fu06), |e decay; and 0.0034~{I21} (1982Ba28), 0.00310~{I24} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Other: 0.014~{I2} (1970Pe10, |e decay) which implies M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0027~{I4} (1972Ha29), |e decay. In (n,|g), 1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=0.0022~{I24} and assign mult=E2(M1). |g is doubly placed, but most of the intensity in the |e decay is associated with this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00044~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06), 0.00044~{I3} (1972Ha29), from |e decay; and 0.00051~{I13} (1982Ba28), 0.000338~{I16} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |e decay: |g|g(|q) |d=0.03 {I8} (1967Ke15) and |<0.1 (1968We17); and from |g(|q) |d=+0.012 {I4} (1975Ul01) and -0.015 {I35} (1979Ri17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00033~{I3} (1972Ha29), 0.00032~{I+3-2} (1970Fu06), from |e decay; and 0.00040~{I9} (1982Ba28), 0.00325~{I16} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). |g is doubly placed, but both placements imply mult=E1. 
MR From |e decay: |g(|q) |d=-0.030 {I5} (1975Ul01) and -0.008 {I25} (1979Ri17); and from |g|g(|q) |d=0.02 {I13}. Although the latter two values are consistent with pure E1, all three values suggest 0.1% M2. The |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00024~{I21} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); and 0.000386~{I23} (1993Kl03), 0.00056~{I12} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay, |d=-0.03 {I+3-7} (1972Ha17) and <0.28 (1977Co22), so M2 contribution is |<1%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.000328~{I22} (1993Kl03), 0.00044~{I14} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g); and 0.0005~{I4} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0053~{I20} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.0051~{I26} (1982Ba28), 0.0060~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0044~{I6} in (n,|g), 1993Kl03 report mult=E1, but their placement is not consistent with this. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029~{I8} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.00313~{I18} (1993Kl03), 0.0028~{I9} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0057~{I2} (1993Kl03), 0.003~{I2} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). |g is doubly placed, but both placements are consistent with E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0027~{I4} in |e decay, 1972Ha29 report mult=E1. From |a(K)exp=0.0020~{I24} in (n,|g), 1993Kl03 report E2(M1). |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023~{I3} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.00201~{I22} (1993Kl03), 0.0030~{I8} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.014~{I9} (1974Kl09), 0.014~{I6} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.012~{I4} (1982Ba28), 0.011209 (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). See comment on this |g in the {+156}Eu |b{+-} Decay data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0079~{I28} (1966Dz08), 0.0097~{I8} (1974Kl09), 0.0099~{I15} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.0089~{I11} (1982Ba28), 0.0071~{I4} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.155~{I12} (1993Kl03), 0.059~{I12} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). Large |a(K)exp from 1993Kl03 may indicate an E0 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0022~{I4} (1972Ha29, |e decay); and 0.00202~{I32} (1982Ba28), 0.00164~{I8} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035~{I11} (1964Pe17), 0.0020~{I3} (1966Dz08), 0.0025~{I2} (1974Kl09), 0.0030~{I4} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.0022~{I13} (1982Ba28), 0.00327~{I19} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0022~{I3} (1966Dz08), 0.00236~{I18} (1974Kl09), 0.00219~{I16} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00220~{I15} (1993Kl03), 0.0025~{I6} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0015~{I2} (1964Pe17), 0.0020~{I3} (1966Dz08), 0.00196~{I15} (1974Kl09), 0.00175~{I1} (1976Ya11); and 0.00210~{I12} (1993Kl03), 0.0007~{I4} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0057 {I12} (1974Kl09). Authors assign M1+E2, but placement requires M1 (for which |a=0.0081). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0065~{I9} (1966Dz08), 0.0067~{I5} (1974Kl09), 0.0059~{I3} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.0057~{I3} (1993Kl03), 0.0058~{I10} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q) 0.050 {I11} (1970Ru09) and -0.075 {I25} (1977Co22), from |b{+-} decay. Other: from |g|g(|q) 0.14 {I+6-14} (1962Ba38). Evaluator assumes sign for 1970Ru09 needs to be reversed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00067~{I11} (1964Pe17), 0.00095~{I14} (1966Dz08), 0.00085~{I8} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay. From (n,|g), 1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=0.00039~{I10}, but show mult=?. 
MR From |g|g(|q) |d=0.40 {I5} (1972Ha17) and +0.32 {I5} (1977Co22), from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00087~{I12} (1966Dz08), 0.00093~{I7} (1974Kl09), and 0.00088~{I7} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay, where |g is a singlet. From (n,|g), 1982Ba28 show this |g as doubly placed, while 1993Kl03 show a 1965.136 |g, but place it elsewhere in the level scheme. From |g branching considerations, it is likely that most of the intensity of this |g in (n,|g) is associated with this other placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.012~{I7} (1993Kl03), >0.0020 (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1,E2,E0, but placement requires E2. Note that this transition is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0302~{I24} (1993Kl03), 0.022~{I7} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020~{I4} for the peak (1993Kl03), (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1, but placement requires E1. Note, |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00077~{I15} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1,E2, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=0.018~{I3}, which is much larger than that for M1. However, |g is doubly placed in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00081~{I12} (1966Dz08), 0.00093~{I9} (1974Kl09), 0.00087~{I12} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00086~{I19} (1982Ba28), 0.00064~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q), |d=-0.57 {I3} (1972Ha17), 0.62 {I3} (1977Co22), from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.) value computed directly from the empirical B(M1)|^ from (|g,|g'). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0010~{I8} (1964Pe17), 0.00076~{I10} (1966Dz08), 0.00079~{I7} (1974Kl09), 0.00078 {12} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00092~{I16} (1982Ba28), 0.00080~{I6} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From (|a,2n|g). From ({+13}C,|a3n|g), I|g(321.81|g)/I|g(1062.5|g)=1.2 {I4}. 
M |a(K)exp=0.025 {I7} and |g(|q) (1981Ko03), (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0141~{I14} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp<0.0041 and assign mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.008 (1959Of11), 0.0061 (1970Pe10), and L-subshell ratios (1970Fu06), all from |e decay. 
MR From |g(|q) |d=-0.009 {I4} (1975Ul01), +0.024 {I19} (1979Ri17), from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00318~{I20} (1970Fu06), 0.0034~{I3} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; and 0.0031~{I6} (1982Ba28), 0.00369~{I22} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). Also L-subshell ratios (1970Fu06), from |e decay. 
MR From |g|g(|q), |d(M2/E1)=-0.03 {I+15-13} (1967Ke15), -0.09 {I1} (1968We17), and +0.06 {I2} (1975Ul01). Other |g|g(|q): |d=0.0 (1962Lo01), 0.21 {I4} (1959Of11). All values from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I+10-3} and assigned M1+E2 (1970Fu06) and 0.0020 {I5} with E1 assignment (1972Ha29), all from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.157~{I14} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). |a(K)exp is larger than that for pure M1, suggesting an E0 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0037~{I3} (1993Kl03), 0.0042~{I25} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). Both authors report mult=E1, but placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0182~{I20} (1993Kl03), <0.0073 (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 1993Kl03 report mult=M1. 1982Ba28 report E2,E1. Placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0111~{I15} (1993Kl03), 0.0033~{I14} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 1993Kl03 report mult=M1. 1982Ba28 report E2,E1. Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00104~{I8} (1993Kl03), 0.00085~{I22} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). Mult may be M1 or E2. Placement requires E2. 
M$1993Kl03 report mult=M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0083~{I5} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). For the (714.8+715.2) peak, 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp=0.0045~{I19}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035~{I+12-4} (1970Fu06), 0.0024~{I3} (1972Ha29), from |e decay; 0.0034~{I7} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 1982Ba28 report mult=E2,(E1). Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0011~{I+4-3} (1970Fu06), 0.00087~{I15} (1971Mc01), from |e decay; 0.0012~{I6} (1982Ba28), 0.00098~{I7} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q), |d(M2/E1)=-0.025 {I12} (1975Ul01) and -0.027 {I31} (1979Ri17), from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00028~{I+6-3} (1970Fu06, |e decay); and <0.003 (1982Ba28, (n,|g)). 
MR From |g(|q), |d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I10} (1979Ri17), from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00030~{I3} (1970Fu06, |e decay); and 0.00063~{I26} (1982Ba28), 0.000266~{I21} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g(|q), |d(M2/E1)=-0.013 {I7} (1975Ul01) and -0.02 {I5} (1979Ri17). So, |<0.04% M2 contribution is allowed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0030~{I5} (1982Ba28), 0.0030~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). |a(K)exp implies mult=E1 or E2, but |g is doubly placed. This placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0139~{I19} (1993Kl03), <0.012 (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
M$|g is doubly placed. This placement requires a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.063 {I13} (1981Ko03), (|a,2n|g). 
MR From |g(|q) and ce data -0.6<|d(M2/E1)<+1.7 (1981Ko03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050~{I13} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). 1993Kl03 report mult=E2,(M1), but placement requires a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(L2)exp=0.065~{I20} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). These authors report mult=E2?, but |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00290~{I20} (1993Kl03), 0.0009~{I5} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 1993Kl03 report mult=E2+M1, 1982Ba28 report E1. Placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I10} (1982Ba28), (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=E2+M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00037~{I3} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). These authors report mult=E1(E2), but placement indicates no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00150~{I19} (1974Kl09), 0.00116~{I21} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00152~{I12} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q), |d(M2/E1)<0.28 (1977Co22), |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0008~{I3} (1976Ya11), |b{+-} decay; and 0.00120~{I21} (1993Kl03), <0.0018 (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q), |d(M2/E1)=-0.04 {I+9-8} (1977Co22), |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00066~{I8} (1964Pe17), 0.00060~{I9} (1966Dz08), 0.00069~{I5} (1976Ya11), |b{+-} decay; and 0.00082~{I22} (1982Ba28), 0.00066~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q), |d=+0.5 {I1} (1962Ba38), -1.2 {I2} (1972Ha17), and -1.5 {I+4-2} (1977Co22), from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00076~{I14} (1964Pe17), 0.00069~{I5} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00088~{I7} (1993Kl03), 0.00043~{I14} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03, in (n,|g), report |a(K)exp=0.51~{I12}, which is larger than that for M1, suggesting an E0 component. Note, |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0139~{I19} (1993Kl03), <0.0117 (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). These authors report mult=E2,E1 and E1, respectively, but |g is multiply placed. This placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040~{I16} (1982Ba28), 0.0011~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). These authors report mult=E2,M1 and E1?, respectively. This placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00086~{I23} (1982Ba28), 0.00088~{I7} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 1993Kl03 report mult=M1, 1982Ba28 report mult=M1,E2, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00054~{I15} (1982Ba28), 0.00067~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1(+E2), but the placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.006~{I3} (1976Ya11), |b{+-} decay; and 0.007~{I4} (1982Ba28), 0.0073~{I4} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038~{I8} (1976Ya11), |b{+-} decay; and 0.0056~{I29} (1982Ba28), 0.0064~{I6} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00027~{I4} (1976Ya11), |b{+-} decay; and 0.00033~{I11} (1982Ba28), 0.00026~{I3} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0060~{I3} (1993Kl03), 0.0051~{I25} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
M$Reported as E1 by 1982Ba28 and 1993Kl03, but |g is multiply placed. This placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00189~{I13} (1993Kl03), 0.0024~{I5} (1982Ba28), (n,|g). 
M$1982Ba28 and 1993Kl03 report mult=E2, but placement requires a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00076~{I5} (1993Kl03), 0.00055~{I9} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
M$1993Kl03 report mult=M1(E2), while 1982Ba28 report E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I14} (1972Ha29), |e decay, but |g is multiply placed. The ce data are consistent with mult=E2, but this placement requires a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From energy difference, this |g more likely populates the 4-, rather than the 0-, member of the doublet of 1952.3 levels. If so, then J{+|p}=3+ for the 2240 level. However, which of these two placements is correct is regarded as uncertain. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0152~{I10} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00024~{I6} (1993Kl03), 0.00025~{I8} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). Mult=E1 from 1982Ba28, 1993Kl03, (n,|g), but placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.026~{I5} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)), mult=E2. |g is doubly placed, but both are consistent with E2. ADO ratio in ({+13}C,|a3n|g) gives mult=Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0021 {I5} (1981Ko03), (|a,2n|g). 
MR From |g(|q), |d<-10 (1981Ko03), (|a,2n|g). (1981Ko03 give |d>-10, but the evaluator suspects that <-10 was intended.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L1)exp=0.050~{I6} (1993Kl03), |a(K)exp<0.357 (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.095~{I6} (1993Kl03), 0.29~{I9} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.073~{I4} (1993Kl03), 0.080~{I3} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). 
M$1982Ba28 and 1993Kl03 report mult=E2, but placement requires a parity change. Note, |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.091~{I17} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). The ce data indicate mult=M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010~{I2} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). The ce data allow mult=M1,E2, but the placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$From |a(K)exp=0.0091~{I22} (1993Kl03), (n,|g). From |a(K)exp=0.06~{I3}, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=E2,M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0031~{I17} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay); and >0.0024 (1982Ba28, (n,|g)). From |a(K)exp=0.00058~{I6}, 1993Kl03 deduce mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0008~{I3} (1964Pe17), 0.00058~{I9} (1966Dz08), 0.00062~{I6} (1974Kl09), 0.00064~{I5} (1976Ya11), from |b{+-} decay; and 0.00075~{I21} (1982Ba28), 0.00062~{I5} (1993Kl03), from (n,|g). 
MR From |g|g(|q) (1977Co22), from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00051~{I29} (1976Ya11, |b{+-} decay). From |a(K)exp=0.00021~{I3} in (n,|g), 1993Kl03 report mult=E1. Placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0065~{I13} in (n,|g), 1993Kl03 report mult=E1(E2). Placement indicates no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00078~{I6}, 1993Kl03 report mult=M1. From |a(K)exp<=0.00052, 1982Ba28 report mult=E1,E2. Placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$For the 943.9 doublet in (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0025~{I3} (1981Ko03). These authors assign E1 for this placement and M1+E2 for the other. Mult=D, from the ADO-ratio data in ({+13}C,|a3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0109~{I15} (1993Kl03,(n,|g)), much larger than that for M1, suggesting an E0 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00070~{I14} (1993Kl03,(n,|g)). The ce data indicate mult=E1, but the placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00062~{I4} in (n,|g), 1993Kl03 deduce mult=M1(E2). 1982Ba28, from |a(K)exp=0.00030~{I7} in (n,|g), deduce E1. Placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0034~{I3} (1993Kl03), 0.0035~{I10} (1982Ba28), from (n,|g). From |a(K)exp, mult=M1+E2, but placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Value from ({+13}C,|a3n|g). 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.026~{I5} (1981Ko03, (|a,2n|g)), mult=E2. |g is doubly placed, but both are consistent with E2. ADO ratio in ({+13}C,|a3n|g) gives mult=Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$From ({+13}C,|a3n|g). E|g=1273.1~{I2} in (|a,2n|g). See the comment in the (|a,2n|g) data set regarding the placement of this |g. 
M$From ADO ratio data in ({+13}C,|a3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From ({+13}C,|a3n|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.014~{I4} from (|a,2n|g) (1981Ko03) gives E2. |g is doubly placed, but both placements accommodate E2, and the other |g is known to be E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 2010Do13 (|a,2n|g). 1981Ko03, in (|a,2n|g), report E|g=469.6 and show it doubly placed, the other placement being from the 2829, 13- level. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.014~{I4}, from (|a,2n|g), gives E2 for the doublet. From ({+13}C,|a3n|g), mult=E2 for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1959Ha07. Others: 88.9637~{I24} (1970Ra37); 88.97 (1962Ew01). The values of 1959Ha07 and 1970Ra37 are from curved-crystal measurements. The third is from ce measurements. More precise values have been obtained from (n,|g)-based curved-crystal measurements. 
L1:L2:L3=168 {I1}: 950 {I4}: 1000 from weighted average of 170 {I3}: 943 {I10}: 1000 (1967Ge07) and 168 {I1}: 952 {I5}: 1000 (1981Bu24). Others: 1962Ew01 and 1964Pe17. 
M1:M2:M3=146 {I2}: 909 {I12}: 1000 from 1981Bu24. Other: (1962Ew01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1970Ra37. Others: 199.19~{I6} (1959Ha07); 199.19~{I5} (1974Kl09); 199.19 (1962Ew01). The values from 1970Ra37 and 1959Ha07 are from curved-crystal measurements, that from 1974Kl09 is from Ge(Li)-based |g spectroscopy, and that from 1962Ew01 is from ce measurements. More precise values have been obtained from (n,|g)-based curved-crystal measurements. 
L1:L2:L3=100: 112: 100 from average of 98: 123: 100 (1962Ew01) and 102: 100: 100 (1964Pe17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=0.60~{I5} for the composite peak. Split of intensity is that of the evaluator deduced from the intensities of the 472.7, 585.8 and 709.9 |g's from the 1715 and 1952, 0-, levels in (n,|g) with corresponding values in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=0.60~{I5} for the composite peak. Split of intensity is that of the evaluator deduced from the intensities of the 472.7, 585.8 and 709.9 |g's from the 1952, 0-, and 1715 levels in (n,|g) with corresponding values in |b{+-} decay. 
M$From decomposition by the evaluator of |a(K)exp=0.0112~{I9} for the composite peak in (n,|g), assuming mult=E2 for the other component. a small component of E2 is not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E This is the placement given by 1974Kl09; and the multipolarity agrees. 1974Kl09 also show coincidences with the 88 |g, which suggests an additional placement from the 2293 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Placement is by evaluator. This |g is placed from the 2205 level by 1974Kl09 and the multipolarity agrees. 1974Kl09 also show coincidences with the 88 |g, which suggests this additional placement from the 2293 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=0.38~{I4} for this peak. From the (n,|g) reaction, I|g(877|g)/I|g(1174|g)=0.42~{I4}. Thus, the component from this level has I|g=0.23~{I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Previously placed from the other 1934 level (3-). 
M$From (n,|g). From |e decay, mult=E2 (1972Ha29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=0.484 for the doublet. The split in intensity of the peak between this level and the 1952.2 level was deduced by the evaluator from the I|g values of the 676, 704 and 1646 |g's in the {+156}Tb |e decay and the (n,|g) reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(632|g)/I|g(704|g) in (n,|g) and I|g(704|g). From Ice(K)=0.00029 (1970Fu06) and mult=E2, I|g=0.053. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=0.484~{I28} for the doublet. The split in the peak's intensity between this level and the 1934, 3- level was deduced by the evaluator from the I|g values of the 676, 704 and 1646 |g's in the {+156}Tb |e decay and the (n,|g) reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Previously placed from a 1948.9 level. This level, however, is no longer believed to exist. 
RI$Note that, from Ice(K)=0.0012 (1970Fu06) and an M1,E2 multipolarity deduced from the associated J{+|p} values, I|g is expected to be 0.17 units. A |g of that intensity should have been seen. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$This portion of the 877 |g peak was previously placed from the 2232 level. 
RI$For this peak, I|g=0.38~{I4}. 0.23~{I2} units were apportioned to the other placement (the 1462 level), leaving 0.15~{I5} units for this one. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI Value is for I|g(1153.4+1154.2). From |g branching from 1154 and 1242 levels in the {+156}Gd Adopted |g radiations, one would have 2.3 for this combined intensity and I|g(1154)=1.9. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI Value is for I|g(1153.4+1154.2). From |g branching from 1154 and 1242 levels in the {+156}Gd Adopted |g radiations, one would have 2.3 for this combined intensity and I|g(1153)=0.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=5.0~{I1} for this peak. Value is from I|g(1169|g)/I|g(969|g) in |b{+-} decay and I|g(969|g) in (|a,2n|g). 1981Ko03 place a 1169 |g from two other places in the level scheme as well, namely from the 6+ level at 1753 and from the (8+) level at 2134. The evaluator has questioned the existence of significant |g strength from the 1753 level and has placed the remaining I|g from the 2134 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Note that this energy is more than 1~keV larger that the corresponding level-energy difference. Only a small fraction of this peak is associated with this placement, however. 
RI$I|g=1.8~{I5} for this peak. Value is from I|g(1259|g)/I|g(969|g) in |b{+-} decay and I|g(969|g) in (|a,2n|g). The evaluator has shown the remaining I|g as unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1981Ko03 place the full strength of this |g peak from this level. 
RI$I|g=0.5~{I2} for the peak. The intensity associated with this placement was computed from I|g(770|g)/I|g(1067|g) in the |e decay and I|g(1067|g) from the (|a,2n|g) data. The remainder of this intensity is presently unplaced. From the relative intensities of the |g's from the even-spin members of |g-vibrational bands to members of ths g.s. band in other even-even deformed nuclei, it is expected that the |DJ=-2 transition will be considerably weaker than the |DJ=0 and |DJ=+2 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$1981Ko03 report I|g(823.4|g)/I|g(1119.9|g)=0.2, with the latter value estimated from |g|g coin data. In the Adopted Gammas, this ratio is 0.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI From I|g(155)/I|g(1222)=0.046 {I2}, from {+156}Gd Adopted |g radiations for the 1510 level and I|g(1222). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$From comparison of the relative |g branching from the (n,|g) reaction and in |b{+-} decay, all the intensity of this |g in (n,|g) can be accounted for by the deexcitation of the 1258 level, leaving none for this level. The evaluator has thus shown this placement as questionable and assigned I|g=0 for it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=1.6~{I2} for the composite peak. 0.19 units are assigned to the other placement, leaving 1.4 units here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 2010Do13. |g not reported by 1981Ko03. 
MR$From |g(|q), |d lies between +0.4 and 0.47 (2010Do13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=5.0~{I1} for the composite peak. 0.4 units are assigned to deexcitation of the 1258 level. 1981Ko03 assign a portion of this peak to the deexcitation of the 1753, 6+ level. However, the evaluator has not accepted such a placement, leaving the remaining intensity to be associated with the deexcitation of this 2134 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(399|g)/I|g(1284|g) in ({+13}C,|a3n|g) and I|g(1284|g). 
M$Mult=E2 for this doubly placed |g. Both placements indicate E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 2010Do13. 1981Ko03 report E|g=436.5 and show it as doubly placed. 2001Su06, ({+13}C,|a3n|g), place this |g elsewhere in the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$1981Ko03 report I|g=2.3 {I1} for the composite peak. After removal of the contribution from the other placement, I|g=2.1 {I} is computed. 
M$|g is doubly placed, but both placements are consistent with E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2010Do13 list E|g=1013.4 {I3} in their table of |g-ray data, but show 1011 in their level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g shown doubly placed by 1981Ko03, the other placement being from the 2360, 11- level. In the ({+13}C,|a3n|g) data, all the intensity of this |g is placed from this (2686) level (see the comment for the other placement of this |g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$This I|g value is near that expected, from the ({+13}C,|a3n|g) data, for the 11+|)10+ transition. In the Adopted Gammas, the evaluator has placed this |g from the 2686, 11+ level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 2010Do13. 1981Ko03 report E|g=469.6 and show it doubly placed, the other placement being from the 2897, (12)- level. 
M Mult determined to be E2 for doubly placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 2010Do13. 1981Ko03 report E|g=469.6 and show it doubly placed, the other placement being from the 2829, (13)- level. 
RI$1981Ko03 report I|g=0.8 {I2} for their (doubly placed) |g. 
M Mult determined to be E2 for doubly placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1993Kl03, 1982Ba28. Others: 88.967~{I2} (1961Sc19); 88.974~{I11} (1960Wa09). All are curved-crystal measurements. 
RI$From 1993Kl03. 1982Ba28 report I|g=1980~{I100}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 199.2193~{I10} (1982Ba28, after adjustment of their energy scale); 199.216~{I5} (1961Sc19); 199.24~{I5} (1960Wa09). All are curved-crystal measurements. 
RI$From 1993Kl03. 1982Ba28 report I|g=2842~{I200}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
RI$From 1993Kl03. Some studies [e.g., (|a,2n|g) and 1982Ba28 in (n,|g)] propose that this |g is multiply placed, in particular that it may also deexcite the 1753.8, 6+ K=4 level. However, the relative I|g values of the 969.8 and 1169.0 |g's from the data of 1993Kl03 agree well with those from the {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay, where the 1169 peak is clearly a single |g. Further, the 1169 |g may have an E0 component, which is not expected for a placement from the 1753.8 level, for which |DK=4. The evaluator has concluded that the 1169 |g in (n,|g) is a single transition whose placement is from this 1258.0 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$1993Kl03 propose that this |g as doubly placed, with the second placement being from the 2106 level. However, the |g branching of this level is consistent with that observed in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay and the multipolarity is not consistent with that second placement. The evaluator has thus chosen not to adopt the placement from the 2106 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 2010Je02. |g not reported in earlier studies. From the energy difference of the 5- and 3- levels connected by this |g, E|g=131.9894 {I19} is computed (2010Je02). 
RI$From 2010Je02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.059~{I4}, 1993Kl03 deduce mult=E2. From |a(K)exp=0.23~{I9}, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03 place some of this |g here. However, such a |g should have been seen in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay, and it was not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Undivided I|g for this |g is 2.68~{I18} (1993Kl03). The split of this intensity was deduced by the evaluator from comparison of the relative I|g values of the 585.8, 472.6 and 709.9 |g's in the {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay and (n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0112~{I9} (1993Kl03) suggests mult=M1+E2 for the composite peak. This placement requires mult=E2 for this component. See the comment regarding mult for the other peak component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$This placement is that of 1982Ba28. 
RI$This placement requires mult=E0 and, hence, I|g must be zero here. The remaining intensity is not placed in the level scheme. 
TI$Value deduced by the evaluator from I(ce(K))=0.057~{I2} (1993Kl03), after subtracting for the contribution from the 665.7 |g. For this latter contribution, the evaluator has assumed mult=M1, for which |a(K)=0.0105. 1982Ba28 report I(ce(K))=0.089~{I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI$1982Ba28 and 1993Kl03 report I|g<21 and 3.3~{I18}, respectively, for this transition. Since this placement involves 0+ states, the |g intensity presumably is all associated with the other placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp<0.0062, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=E1. From |a(K)exp=0.0137~{I10}, 1993Kl03 deduce E2(+M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$In their level scheme, 1993Kl03 place this |g from the 1798 level, but do not show it in their line list. 1982Ba28 also do not report this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement is that of 1982Ba28. 
M$1982Ba28 report mult=E2,M1. 1993Kl03 report mult=E1. This placement requires mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$|g placed from a 2360, 1+, level by 2000GrZY. If the present placement is correct, mult=E2. The ce data indicate M1(+E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From the I|g values of the 496, 603 and 697.6 |g's in {+156}Tb |e decay, one expects I|g(697|g)=34 in (n,|g). Thus, it is expected that all the intensity of this |g is associated with the decay of this level. 1993Kl03 show this |g as doubly placed, the other placement being from the 1995 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g,I|g, from 1982Ba28. These authors do not place this |g in their level-scheme table. 1993Kl03 place a 453.0 |g from this level, but do not show it in their line list. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Total I|g for this |g is 1.5~{I3}. The listed value is that remaining after allocation of 0.75~{I6} units to the other placement. 
M$From ce data, mult=M1(+E2), but placement requires E2. Note that this |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$For the total peak, 1982Ba28 report E1. 1993Kl03 report E2 and comment that it is not consistent with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|g shown doubly placed by 1993Kl03, the other placement being from the 1715 level. As such, a 561 |g should have been seen in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay. Since it is not, the evaluator has not adopted that placement and shows the full intensity of this |g from this level. 
RI$From 1993Kl03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Of the total I|g (=8.0~{I11}) of this |g, 2.0 units are assigned to the decay of the 1934.353 level. The remainder is assigned by the evaluator to the decay of this level and the 1934.154 level (J{+|p}=2-). Note, however, that this latter component is likely to be small, based on the decay of the two 1934 levels as observed in the {+156}Tb |e decay, where the 1916 level is not populated. 
M$From 1982Ba28 and from {+156}Tb |e decay. 1993Kl03 report E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$1982Ba28 show this as doubly placed, the other placement being from the other 1934 level. 
RI$Total intensity of this |g is 57~{I4}. The listed value is the difference between this total and that of the other placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$1982Ba28 show this as triply placed, the other placements being from the 1916 level and the other 1934 level. 
RI$Total intensity is 8.0~{I11}. After allocation of 2.0 units to the decay of the 1934.353 level, the remainder is to be allocated between the other two placements of this peak. Note that the fraction of this I|g value associated with the decay of this (the 1934.154, 2-) level is likely to be small, based on the {+156}Tb |e decay, where the 1916 level is not populated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Total I|g=6.1~{I4} for this |g. The remainder is associated with the decay of the other 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Total I|g=5.9~{I5} for this |g. The remainder is associated with the decay of the other 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$See the comment on the other placement of this |g. 
RI$Total intensity is 54.6~{I27} (1982Ba28). Listed value is the residual after accounting for the decay of the other 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Total intensity is 4.4~{I4}. Listed value is the residual after accounting for the decay of the other 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Total I|g=58~{I2} for this |g. Listed value is that remaining after accounting for the decay of the other 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1982Ba28. The placement is from the level scheme of 1993Kl03, although these authors do not show this |g in their line list. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$1982Ba28 show this as doubly placed, the other placement being from the other 1934 level. 
RI$From I|g(614|g)/I|g(1646|g) from {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 1982Ba28 show the remainder of this I|g deexciting the lower 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$1982Ba28 show this as triply placed, the other placements being from the 1916 level and the other 1934 level. From the {+156}Tb |e decay (where the 1916 level is not populated), it is expected that the portion of this peak associated with the decay of the other 1934 level is small. 
RI$From I|g(658|g)/I|g(1646|g) in {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 
M$From 1982Ba28 and from {+156}Tb |e decay. 1993Kl03 report E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Total intensity of this |g is 2.51~{I15} (1993Kl03). The listed intensity is what remains after allocating 0.89 units to the decay of the 4-, 1952 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(686|g)/I|g(1646|g) from {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 1982Ba28 show the remainder of this I|g deexciting the lower 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(691|g)/I|g(1646|g) in {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 1982Ba28 show the remainder of this I|g deexciting the lower 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1982Ba28. 1993Kl03 do not report this |g, even though its intensity is such that it should have been seen by them. Such a |g is placed from this level in the {+156}Tb |e decay. 
RI$From I|g(780|g)/I|g(1646|g) in {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 1982Ba28 show the remainder of this I|g deexciting the lower 1934 level and possibly a 2056 level. This latter level, however, has not been confirmed in later studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(805|g)/I|g(1646|g) in {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 1982Ba28 show the remainder of this I|g deexciting the lower 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(1845|g)/I|g(1646|g) in {+156}Tb |e decay and I|g(1646|g). 1982Ba28 show the remainder of this I|g deexciting the lower 1934 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g observed but not placed by 1982Ba28. 
RI$Difference between the total I|g(632.7|g)=4.18~{I16} and that placed from the other 1952 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Total intensity of this |g is 2.51~{I15} (1993Kl03). The listed intensity split was obtained from I|g(676)/I|g(1646), from {+156}Tb |e decay, and I|g(1646) from (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Undivided I|g for this |g is 2.68~{I18} (1993Kl03). The split of this intensity was deduced by the evaluator from comparison of the relative I|g values of the 585.8, 472.6 and 709.9 |g's in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay and in (n,|g). 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0112~{I9} (1993Kl03) for the composite peak and assuming mult=E2, as required, for the other placement, the evaluator deduces |a(K)exp|?0.014 for this component of the doublet. This is that expected for mult=M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g reported but not placed by 1982Ba28. 1993Kl03 place this |g entirely from the other 1952 level. 
RI$From I|g(632.79|g)/I|g(709.9|g) in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay and I|g(709.0|g) in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1993Kl03 place a portion of this |g peak from this level. However, in light of the smaller than expected intensity of this |g from the 1851.8 level, this placement is questionable. 
RI$Most likely, very little of the intensity of this |g is associated with the decay of this level (see the comment on the I|g value for the other placement of this transition). The evaluator has assigned I|g=0 for this placement and has shown it as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Placement is that proposed by 1993Kl03. 
RI$From 1993Kl03. 1982Ba28 report I|g<21. 
M$Other placement is E0. This placement requires mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g not reported by 1993Kl03 in their line list, but placed here by them in their level scheme table. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Computed from I|g(706.9|g)/I|g(2026.7|g), from {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay, and I|g(2026.7|g). 
M$1993Kl03 report mult=M1(E2), but placement requires a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Computed from I|g(768.5|g)/I|g(2026.7|g), from {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay, and I|g(2026.7). 
M$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=0.018~{I3}, which is much larger than that for M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Computed from I|g(858.5|g)/I|g(2026.7|g), from {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay, and I|g(2026.7). 
M$1993Kl03 report mult=E2(M1), but |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0141~{I14} (1993Kl03). These authors report mult=E2?. 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp<0.0041 and assign mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1993Kl03 report mult=E2, but this placement requires a parity change. Note that a 582.6 |g was seen in |e decay, but its I|g value is much smaller than that implied by the one listed here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement is from the level scheme of 1993Kl03. However, neither these authors or 1982Ba28 show this |g in their line lists. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=0.51~{I12}, which is larger than that for an M1. Since this placement requires a parity change, the implied E0 component may be associated with the other proposed placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$The ce data indicate mult=E2,E1, but placement requires a parity change. Note, |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Total I|g for this |g is 4.1~{I12}. The listed value is that remaining after allocating 2.38~{I14} units to the other placement. 
M$1993Kl03 report mult=E2(M1), but |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g not shown in the line lists of either 1993Kl03 or 1982Ba28. Placement is that shown in the level-scheme table of 1993Kl03. 
RI$Computed by the evaluator from the relative |g branching in the level-scheme table of 1993Kl03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$From 1982Ba28. This placement is from the level scheme of 1993Kl03, but they do not show this |g in their line list. 1982Ba28 do not place it. ce data indicate mult=E2+M1, but placement requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00088~{I7} (1993Kl03), evaluator infers mult=M1. 1993Kl03 report M1(E2). 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp=0.00043~{I14}, suggesting E2,E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=0.51~{I12}, which is larger than that for an M1, suggesting an E0 component. Note, |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,E1
decay_comment:
M$From 1993Kl03. 1982Ba28 report E1, but |g is multiply placed. This placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g not shown in the line lists of either 1993Kl03 or 1982Ba28. However, it is shown in the tabular level scheme of 1993Kl03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Reported as E1 by 1982Ba28 and 1993Kl03, but |g is multiply placed. This placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$|g shown as doubly placed by 1993Kl03, the other placement being from the 2026, 1+ level. However, no 897 |g is reported from this level in the |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1982Ba28 report mult=M1. 1993Kl03 report M1(E2). |a(K)exp from 1993Kl03 is much larger than that for M1. Note, |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1982Ba28 and 1993Kl03 report mult=E2, but placement requires a parity change. Note, |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g not reported by 1982Ba28 or 1993Kl03, but shown with this placement in the level-scheme table of 1993Kl03. 
RI$Computed by the evaluator from the listed branching in the decay-scheme table of 1993Kl03, and I|g(901.4|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$The ce data indicate mult=M1. If J{+|p}=1- for the 2259 level, then this |g must involve a parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.06~{I3}, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=E2,M1. From |a(K)exp=0.0091~{I22}, 1993Kl03 deduce mult=E1. Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$It is possible that the 1027.11 |g is actually the one that deexcites this level. Either I|g value is much larger than that expected based on the decay |g's from this level in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1982Ba28 report I|g<9 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00058~{I6}, 1993Kl03 deduce mult=E1. From |a(K)exp>0.0024, 1982Ba28 conclude mult=E2,M1. Placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$2000GrZY do not place this |g here. The evaluator places it based on the decay of this level as seen in {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1993Kl03 SHOW THE 1946 LEVEL AS THE FINAL STATE FOR THIS G. 
$Placement is that of the evaluator. 1993Kl03 place this |g from a 2259.7 level, but the final state implied by such a placement is not otherwise observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1993Kl03 SHOW THE 2047 LEVEL AS THE FINAL STATE FOR THIS G. 
$Placement is that of the evaluator. 1993Kl03 place this |g from a 2259.7 level, but the final state implied by such a placement is not otherwise observed. Note that this |g is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00062~{I4}, 1993Kl03 deduce mult=M1(E2). 1982Ba28, from |a(K)exp=0.00030~{I7}, deduce E1. Placement requires no parity change. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=9.7|*10{+-5} 11 and mult=(M1,E2). 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp=4.4|*10{+-5} 2 and deduce mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=8.6|*10{+-5} 14 and mult=(M1). 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp<8.9|*10{+-5} and deduce mult=(E1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=5.9|*10{+-5} 5 and mult=E1. 1982Ba28 report |a(K)exp=8.9|*10{+-5} 11 and deduce mult=M1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=9|*10{+-4} 5, which is much larger than that for M1 or E2. 1982Ba28 do not report this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=2.5|*10{+-4} 7, which is much larger than that for M1 or E2. 1982Ba28 show this |g as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=3.1|*10{+-4} 4, which is much larger than that for M1 or E2. No final level is reported at the energy expected for the termination of this |g. 1982Ba28 do not report this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=8.2|*10{+-5} 17, 1982Ba28 deduce mult=E2,M1. 1993Kl03 report |a(K)exp=2.0|*10{+-5} 12, which is smaller than that for E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 1989Pi05. Note that this differs significantly from I|g=59 as observed in the {+156}Eu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Shown on the level scheme of 2011Su15, but no other information is available on this |g. |g is shown as questionable in the adopted values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.74 {I1} 
$I|g(90|')I|g(130|')=0.58 {I5} 
E$average of 3069 and 3068 from Table 7.3 and 7.4, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$the measured intensity and azimuthal asymmetry suggest it is the transition to the E=89, J{+|p}=2+ state from the 2+ state of scissors mode based on comparisons with the Alaga estimates (2017Be10) 
$asymmetry=0.20 {I11} (2017Be10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI From Coulomb excitation. Others: 28 {I7} from {+157}Eu |b- decay, 8 {I4} from IT decay, and 44 {I6} from (n,|g) resonance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Poor energy fit; level energy difference is 172.78. 
RI From Coulomb excitation; other: 73 {I13} from IT decay and 150 {I8} from (n,n'|g). Coulomb excitation: 92 {I4} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.6|*10{+3}~{I4}, greater than upper limit 1000 presumably because contamination with close lying |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 188 {I25} from Coulomb excitation, 44.8 {I17} from (n,|g) resonance, 31.4 {I17} from (n,n'|g) and 43 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 15.6 {I12} Coulomb excitation and 7.7 {I12} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 9.4 {I12} Coulomb excitation, and 3.20 {I20} from (n,n'|g) . 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: Coulomb excitation value is 30 {I8}, 99 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 118 {I17} from (n,|g) E=resonance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 36.1 {I17} from (n,|g) E=thermal, 36.4 {I24} from (n,|g) E=resonance, 30.0 {I16} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 11.0 {I15} from (n,|g) E=thermal, 7.9 {I4} from (n,n'|g), 7.4 {I22} from (n,|g) E=resonance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 22.9 {I16} from (n,n'|g), 62 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 42 {I8} from (n,|g) E=resonance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$619|g ray uniquely assigned at this level by 2014Ro25 ({+158}Gd(p,d|g)) is based on L=0,1 or 4. However several references place a close-lying 619.3|g-ray at 683.2, 3/2- level (compatible with L=2); so unless they are two diffrent |g's, both placements are rather uncertain 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1986GrZS); other: 8.3 {I10} from (n,n'|g), 5.9 {I18} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 7.8 {I14} from (n,|g) E=resonance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+157}Eu |b- decay; other: 3.4 {I8} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance and 7.1 {I11} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+157}Eu |b- decay; other: 68 {I6} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance and 48.9 {I25} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement requires M2 character, so placement is doubtful. Also 2014Ro25 (({+158}Gd(p,d|g)) did not observe 614|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+157}Eu |b- decay; other: 8.5 {I8} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal and 4.6 {I3} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+157}Eu |b- decay; other: 57 {I9} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal and 28.3 {I18} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance; other: 35 {I4} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g) and 8.3 {I5} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of 284.09~{I23} ({+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance) and 284.44~{I11} ({+157}Gd(n,n'|g)) 
RI from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance; other: 14.3 {I7} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g) and 8 {I6} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance; other: 74 {I4} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g) and 9.2 {I17} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance; other: 23.3 {I13} from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g) and 24.0 {I5} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g); other: 44 {I8} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal and 13 {I7} from {+157}Eu |b- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of: 698.30~{I9} ({+156}Gd(n,|g) E=th), 698.32~{I10} ({+157}Gd(n,n'|g)), 698.59~{I16} ({+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance), and 698.62~{I5} ({+157}Eu |b{+-} decay) 
RI from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g); other: 77 {I6} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of: 612.94~{I22} ({+156}Gd(n,|g) E=th) and 613.20~{I21} ({+157}Gd(n,n'|g)) 
RI from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g); other: 39 {I8} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$average of: 647.57~{I17} ({+157}Gd(n,n'|g)) and 647.75~{I19} ({+156}Gd(n,|g) E=th) 
RI from {+157}Gd(n,n'|g); other: 69 {I12} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of: 865.05~{I20} ({+157}Eu |b{+-} decay), 865.22~{I5} ({+157}Gd(n,n'|g)), and 865.48~{I8} ({+156}Gd(n,|g) E=th) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=thermal; other: 34 {I9} from {+156}Gd(n,|g) E=resonance relative to 722 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=3.81~{I25}, using the calculated normalization. 
MR$Uncertainty estimated by evaluator from L1/L2/L3 data (1962Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$%I|g=0.017~{I6}, using the calculated normalization. 
M J|p values would make this an M2 transition, so placement is questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI Uncertainty given (1993Ko01) as 0.7%, but assigned 7.7% by evaluator to be similar to other values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E Value given (1993Ko01) as 5100.59, but assigned by evaluator as 5110.59 to match proposed level energy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI From transition intensity and |a, I{-|g}=8.0. 
TI Value deduced by evaluator to give 100% feeding of ground state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI From {+157}Eu |b- decay (1980GrZS) one obtains /I{-|g}(64)= 2.0/28 which gives I{-|g}(9)=2.0; and from IT decay (1967Bo05) I(|g+ce)(9)/I(|g+ce)(64)=48/52, which gives I{-|g}(9)=1.6. Average value of 2.0 and 1.6 is used and uncertainty is assigned by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI From measured total I{-|g}(64)+I{-|g}(65)=42 (1967Bo05) minus I{-|g}(65)=11 deduced from intensity balance at 180 level, one obtains I{-|g}=31, but intensity balance at 64 level supports lower value of 1967Bo05. Uncertainty assigned by evaluator and depends, in part, on the lack of knowledge as to the mixing ratio of the 65 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI Value is average of I{-|g}=14 given by 1967Bo05 based on intensity balance at 180 level and assumption that |g is M1 and the I{-|g}=8 deduced if |g is E2. 
TI Value deduced by evaluator from intensity balance at 180 level; since 116 |g is weak and must be E2, value is reliable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Assignment of 619|g from 682.9 level in contrast to previous assignment from 683.2, 3/2+ level is based on L=0,1 or 4 from angular distribution of |?680 keV deuterons in coincidence with 619|g, whereas L=2 is ruled out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$according to {+157}Gd(n,|g) this is an (E2) |g but if so B(E2)(W.u.)>1000 so its placement, multipolarity or branching ratio seem uncertain 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$according to {+157}Gd(n,|g) this is an E2 |g but if so B(E2)(W.u.)=2100 so its placement or branching ratio seem uncertain 
RI$from {+157}Gd(n,|g); other: 1.33 {I10} from {+158}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+157}Gd(n,|g); others: 16 {I5} from {+158}Eu |b- decay and 21.6 {I14} from {+158}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a{-K}(exp) value allows M1,E2 or E1+M2; from the J|p's E1+M2 is required and then |d=0.25 {I+8-12} (from {+157}Gd(n,|g) E=th,res) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+158}Gd(n,n'|g) where |g is a singlet; other: E{-|g}=1588.21 {I15} and I{-|g} < 134 from doublet in {+157}Gd(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+157}Gd(n,|g); other: the I{-|g} of {+158}Gd(n,n'|g) would agree better if this I{-|g} were |? 200. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from {+157}Gd(n,|g); others: 22.1 {I21} from {+158}Gd(n,n'|g) and 9.2 {I6} from {+158}Eu |b- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+158}Eu |b- decay; other: 22 {I4} from {+157}Gd(n,|g) which suggests the latter maybe be a multiplet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$This |g is assigned only to this level in {+158}Eu |b- decay and this is assumed here, although it is also assigned to the 1894, 2- level in the (n,|g) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$This |g is assigned only to the 1894, 2+ level as in the {+158}Eu |b- decay and this is assumed here, although it is also assigned to this level in the (n,|g) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$from {+157}Gd(n,|g); others: 24.8 {I20} from {+158}Gd(n,n'|g) and 51 {I3} from {+158}Eu |b- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From {+157}Gd(n,|g); other: 23.9 {I24} from {+158}Eu |b- decay. 
M$E1 assignment is inconsistent with J|p assignment in {+157}Gd(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$This |g is placed from the 2214 level in {+157}Gd(n,|g), but from a separate level in {+158}Gd(n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$from {+158}Gd(n,n'|g); others: 62 {I21} from (|g,|g') and 24 {I12} from {+158}Eu |b- decay for |g's with questionable placements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=10.6~{I5} 
RI From I{-|b-}(79)=8.6% {I24}; measurements are 20 {I4} (1966Da06) and 44 {I4} (1974Kl11). If a portion of the |b- goes to the ground state, this I{-|g} will be less. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00114~{I8} (1978Gr14) 
RI$calculated from I{-|g}(897)/I{-|g}(977) in {+158}Eu |b- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00163~{I31} (1978Gr14) 
M$|a{-K}(exp) (1978Gr14) implies E2, but that is inconsistent with E1 for |g to ground state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.131~{I31} (1978Gr14) 
M$|a{-K}(exp) is consistent with E1+M2 with |d=0.24 {I7}, but J|p's require pure E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp > 0.0231 (1978Gr14) 
RI$< 6 (measured 1978Gr14). 
TI$calculated from Ice(K)=0.138 {I14} (1978Gr14) and L/K=0.136 (1969Ha61). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00659~{I9} (1978Gr14) 
M$|a{-K}(exp) is greater than |a{-K}(M1), so multipolarity may be E0+M1,E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.387~{I52} (1978Gr14) 
M$|a{-K}(exp) value allows M1,E2 or E1+M2; from the J|p's E1+M2 is required and then |d=0.25 {I+8-12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00513~{I13} (1978Gr14) 
M$|a{-K}(exp) is larger than |a{-K}(M1) so |g may include E0 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00309~{I12} (1978Gr14) 
M,MR$If J|p's are used to require |g be E1+M2, then |d=0.28 {I+3-5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00431~{I31} (1978Gr14) 
M$From |a{-K}(exp) for doubly-placed 832 |g if component from 1371 level is an E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00186~{I19} (1978Gr14) 
M$|a{-K}(exp) for 1061.68 + 1062.38 is consistent with mult(1061) and mult(1062) of E1 and E2 or M1 and E1 with the assigned J|p's consistent with the latter combination. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 2004Gr26, (n{-th},|g) 
RI$From I|g(146|g)/I|g(95|g) in Eu |b- and I|g(146|g). From Eu |b-, I|g=36. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Note: In their summary of the |g branching of the {+159}Gd levels from both |b- decay and (n,|g), 2004Gr26 also place three |g's (1038.2, 1109 and 1159.4) seen in Eu |b- decay but unplaced there from this level. These are not included here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$Existence of this |g and placement supported by possible |g|g coincidences (1969Ke10). Also, 1965Iw01 observe a |g of 54 {I4} keV in this decay. 
TI$Value to give intensity balance at this level with no |b{+-} feeding. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
CC$Note that the E|g value is only 0.5 {I4} keV above the K-shell binding energy of 50.239~keV, rendering the calculation of the respective conversion coefficient problematic. Listed value is from extrapolation of values calculated for higher-energy |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from E(capture state)-2206.6 computed by the evaluator. E|g=2205.1 {I7} is listed by 2003Gr27 in their table (table 3) of primary transitions from 2- and 24-keV n-capture, but this is most likely a secondary transition from the 2206.6 level (which is the level shown there as the final state for that primary transition). 
RI the evaluator assumes that the intensity listed in table 3 of 2003Gr27 is that of the primary transition from the capture state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI In their table (table 3) of primary transitions from 2- and 24-keV n-capture, 2003Gr27 report 18.4 {I3}. This should probably have been 18.4 {I30}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI In their table (table 3) of primary transitions from 2- and 24-keV n-capture, 2003Gr27 report 29.02 {I29}. This should probably have been 29.0 {I29}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Transition implied from |g|g-coin data in 1969Ke10: Nucl. Phys. A137, 679. This transition could not be confirmed by 2022Ha01, probably due to high internal conversion. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertain placement: B(E2)(W.u.)=4.7E3 {I+19-18} exceeds RUL 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.7E3 {I+19-18} exceeds RUL=0.01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from 2017Le04; other values: +0.03 {I3} or -22 {I+11-800} (2009Go33); 0.24 {I10} (2017Le04, higher |h{+2} than for adopted value) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g ray initially considered isotropic by 1989Be48 was proved unisotropic by 2009Go33 and 2015Le05. Moreover 2009Go33 replaced it uniquely at 1499, while 2015Le05 found it as doublet placed at 1499 and 1326 respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from |b- decay (30.8 s), not confirmed by other studies (if placed here it would be a M2 |g which is less likely) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Gr22 in (n,n'|g) dataset where is unclear if this placement or that at 1437.2 level is valid (the latter would populate an inexiting level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from 2017Le04; other values: +0.50 {I+87-24} (2017Le04); +0.16 {I+18-13} or +1.5 {I5} (2009Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertain placement. If this |g originates from (1-), 1966.5 level it would be M2, but B(M2)(W.u.)=1.7E4 {I+9-5} exceeds RUL=1, so M2 is very unlikely. Consequently most likely this |g originates from a close lying (2+,3,4+) level (see J|p comment on 1966 level) 
$B(M2)(W.u.)=1.7E4 {I+9-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertain placement. This transition is part of the group of three |g's that more likely originate from a (2+,3,4+) level, which makes unlikely its placement to this (1-) level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertain placement. If this |g originates from (1-), 1966.5 level it would be E3, but B(E3)(W.u.)=1.0E5 {I+5-3} exceeds RUL=100, so E3 is very unlikely. Consequently most likely this |g originates from a close lying (2+,3,4+) level (see J|p comment on 1966 level) 
$B(E3)(W.u.)=1.0E5 {I+5-3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$relatively pure dipole was adopted as E1(+M2), however M1(+E2) cannot be excluded 
MR$from 2009Go33 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1997Do20. |g is shown as questionable there. 1997Ha64 (having many of the same authors as 1997Do20) report E|g=438 and not as questionable. E|g reported as 433 in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from adopted values. 1989Pi05 take their |g-branching data for this level from other sources. 1994Fr03 do not present data on this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$1989Pi05 take energy and |g-branching data for this level from 1985Le21. No data are given by 1994Fr03 
M dipole excitation in (|g,|g') (1989Pi05). Ratio of reduced transition probabilities of transitions to 0+ and 2+ members of g.s. band agree well with predictions of Alaga rules for |DK=0, which is, according to 1989Pi05, indicative of an E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI the split of intensity between the 3253 and 3256 |g's is not given by 1989Pi05. The evaluator has assumed that the I|g data of 1994Fr03 for the "3331 level" are to be associated with that level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI the split of intensity between the 3328 and 3331 |g's is not given by 1989Pi05. The evaluator has assumed that the I|g data of 1994Fr03 for the "3331 level" are to be associated with that level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$1989Be48 and 2015Le05 confirmed the placement of this |g to 1326 level, which however is not confirmed by 2009Go33 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 2017Le04. Doublet 1350.98 {I4} from 2009Go33 gives poor fit in level scheme, level-energy difference=1351.17 (2009Go33). Second 1350.98|g placed by 2009Go33 at 1599 level is not confirmed by 2017Le04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Gr22 where is unclear if this placement or that at 1437.2 level is valid (the latter would populate an inexiting level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) (1981Mc08), mult=D. Mult=M1 is ruled out since the transition involves a change in parity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)(102.7|g)=2.5 {I3} (deduced from intensity balance at 1070 level from coincidence gate on |g populating 1173 level (2020Ha13)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)(98.8|g)=1.6 {I3} (deduced from intensity balance at 1483 level from coincidence gate on |g populating 1582 level (2020Ha13)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed by 1973Da05 but not confirmed by 2020Ha13 I{-821.6|g}=49 {I7} relative to I{-173.34|g}=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed by 1973Da05 but not confirmed by 2020Ha13 I{-995.0|g}=36 {I5} relative to I{-173.34|g}=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed by 1973Da05 but not confirmed by 2020Ha13 I{-514.8|g}=60 {I9} relative to I{-173.34|g}=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$observed by 1973Da05 but not confirmed by 2020Ha13. I{-412.0|g}=56 {I8} relative to I{-173.34|g}=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$observed by 1973Da05 but not confirmed by 2020Ha13. I{-924.7|g}=19 {I3} relative to I{-173.34|g}=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Most intense |g ray in spectra displayed by 2010NaZY and 2008Os02, which may be indicative of |b feeding to the 241.9 level 
E$other: 168.8 (2008Os02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from 2017Yo01, 0.3 keV uncertainty assumed by evaluators for least-squares fit. This |g was not seen by 2017Pa25, but included in the decay scheme with E|g=61 {I1}. 
$I|g=16 {I6}, from intensity balance (2017Pa25) 
$Reduced E1 hindrance factor f{-|n}=2.37|*10{+6} {I10} (2017Yo01), where |n=|DK-|l 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=854.1 (2017Yo01). I|g=97 {I34} (2017Pa25) 
$Reduced E1 hindrance factor f{-|n}=1.28|*10{+3} {I3} (2017Yo01), where |n=|DK-|l. Other f{-|n}=65 (2017Pa25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed directly, but required by the coincidence relationship. The placement is by the compiler, based on the adopted properties in the ENSDF database for {+164}Gd. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Reduced hindrance f{-|n}=3.77|*10{+7} {I24} (2014Pa55), assuming the the 146-keV transition feeds the K|p=5+ band with |n=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Reduced hindrance f{-|n}=356 {I7} (2014Pa55), assuming the the 183-keV transition feeds the |g band with |n=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$existence of this transition is implied from |g|g-coin data. Intensity is obtained from transition intensity balance at 1418 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$(M1) shown in figure 15 of 2006Ta08 
M$M1+ (6|+3)%E2 from I|g(29.7|g)/I|g(68.5|g) in 181.9|g gated spectrum (1991Fi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E,M$from it decay 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$not suggested by {+115}In({+34}S,3n|g) (2004Kr14) and {+118}Sn({+32}S,p3n|g) (2004Xi01) where the 177|g depopulates the 4867.4+x level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$266.5|g and 385.2|g (from 8388.8+x keV level) are in cascade in 2004Kr14 and in 2004Xi01, but in the second paper 385.2|g is placed below. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$experimental data do not exclude the pure E2 mult. 
MR$calculation with BriccMixing from |a(exp)'s (2011Ko08). |d{+2}=2.8 {I+|@-19} (2011Ko08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
RI corrected for a 25% {I8} contribution from the 1007-keV |g in {+148}Gd. 
M A{-2}=+0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.0067 {I9}, linear polarization=1.09 {I12} (1979Br28), A{-2}=-0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02, |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I5}, E3 (1979Si08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1}, linear polarization=0.94 {I5} (1979Br28), A{-2}=-0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.086 {I5} (1979Si08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.00141 {I17} (1979Br28). Others: A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I3}, |a(K)exp=+0.0021 {I2}, M1+E2, |d=+0.32 {I5} (1979Si08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI corrected for a 15% {I8} contribution from the 240-keV |g from {+145}Eu. 
M A{-2}=-0.09 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I2}; linear polarization=0.92 {I6} (1979Br28), A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.16 {I2} (1979Si08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1979Br28), A{-2}=-0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.22 {I3} (1979Si08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI composite |g in singles spectrum; I|g estimated from coincidence spectra with |?50% uncertainty. 
M A{-2}=-0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1979Br28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 288.0 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 288.4 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Other: 10.7 from ({+10}B,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Others: 306.7 {I2} from ({+10}B,3n|g); 308.8 {I1} from (|a,6n|g) is discrepant 
M$|DJ=0 from |g(|q,pol) in ({+10}B,3n|g) and (|a,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Other: 100 from ({+10}B,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 140.3 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 140.6 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Other: 38 {I13} from ({+31}P,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 431.2 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 431.2 {I1} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Other: 100 {I25} from ({+31}P,4n|g) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.05 {I2} from |g(|q) in ({+10}B,3n|g); |DJ=1 from DCO in ({+7}Li,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 482.2 {I2} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 482.3 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g) and ({+31}P,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 168.4 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 168.5 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 22.4 {I21} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 34.3 {I18} from ({+7}Li,2n|g), and 30.9 {I15} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 215.3 {I2} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 215.6 {I1} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Others: 100 {I6} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 100 {I5} from (|a,6n|g) 
M$|DJ=0 from |g(|q) in ({+10}B,3n|g) and (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 361.0 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 361.4 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
M$some E2 admixture is possible from DCO in ({+7}Li,2n|g) and |g(|q,pol) (|DJ=1) in ({+10}B,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 294.3 {I2} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 294.3 {I1} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Others: 100 {I4} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 100 {I5} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 510.2 {I2} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 509.9 {I3} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 40 {I3} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 37 {I6} from ({+7}Li,2n|g), and 54 {I3} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 329.4 {I2} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 329.2 {I1} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,2n|g). Others: 100 {I5} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 15.8 {I18} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 8.6 {I29} from ({+7}Li,2n|g), and 5.1 {I10} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1395.8 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 1395.5 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+31}P,4n|g). Others: 100 {I20} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) and 100 {I10} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 254.7 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 254.9 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,6n|g). Others: 100 {I11} from ({+31}P,4n|g) and 100 {I27} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1321.6 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 1321.6 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 90 {I5} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 82 {I27} from ({+7}Li,2n|g), and 90 {I10} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 210.5 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 210.6 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 58 {I5} from ({+31}P,4n|g), 57 {I22} from ({+7}Li,2n|g), and 63 {I7} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1146.7 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 1146.7 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+31}P,4n|g). Others: 100 {I14} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) and 100 {I5} from (|a,6n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 249.1 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 249.4 {I2} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+31}P,4n|g). Others: 100 {I38} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) and 100 {I5} from (|a,6n|g) 
MR$from ce data and |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+31}P,4n|g). Other: +0.09 {I4} from |g(|q) in ({+10}B,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 224.7 {I5} from ({+10}B,3n|g) and 224.9 {I3} from ({+7}Li,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+31}P,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 100.8 {I2}, with I|g=17.8 (1990Sa32); 100.8 {I1}, with I|g=14.9 (1975To03); 100.8 {I4}, with I|g=14.8 (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.80 {I20}, |a(L)exp=0.28 {I4} (2019MeZX); from |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=5.5 {I15}, |d(E2/M1)<0.98 (1978Ma19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 106.2 {I2}, with I|g=10.1 {I7} (1990Sa32); 106.3 {I1}, with I|g=7.6 {I4} (1975To03); 106.4 {I4}, with I|g=7.7 {I7} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.54 {I16}, |a(L)exp=0.21 {I5} (2019MeZX); from |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=5 {I2} (1978Ma19), |d(E2/M1)<1.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 253.6 {I2}, with I|g=8.1 {I6} (1990Sa32); 253.4 {I1}, with I|g=7.4 {I8} (1975To03); 253.3 {I4}, with I|g=7.2 {I7} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.125 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 359.8 {I5}, with I|g=0.45 {I9} (1990Sa32); 359.4 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.033 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 653.7 {I4}, with I|g=9.5 {I8} (1990Sa32); 653.6 {I1}, with I|g=8.9 {I9} (1975To03); 653.2 {I4}, with I|g=8.9 {I9} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line. Parent level not proposed in 1981ZuZZ; 653.2|g placed from 755 level 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0068 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 534.8 {I5}, with I|g=1.14 {I18} (1990Sa32); 534.7 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I7} (1981ZuZZ) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.018 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 741.8 {I3}, with I|g=2.53 {I18} (1990Sa32); 741.7 {I1}, I|g=2.6 {I4} (1975To03); 741.9 {I4}, with I|g=2.3 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 653.7 {I4}, with I|g=1.62 {I22} (1990Sa32); 653.2 {I4}, with I|g=8.9 {I9} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line. See also 653.6|g from 689 level 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0068 {I5} gives (M1,E2); M1 preferred by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 754.5 {I5}, with I|g=1.19 {I9} (1990Sa32, probably doublet); 754.8 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0052 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 789.4 {I2}, with I|g=13.9 {I10} (1990Sa32); 789.4 {I1}, I|g=9.7 {I10} (1975To03); 789.5 {I4}, with I|g=9.6 {I10} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0079 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 736.4 {I3}, with I|g=2.6 {I3} (1990Sa32); 736.5 {I1}, with I|g=2.9 {I5} (1975To03) for a composite line; 736.6 {I4}, with I|g=2.8 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0089 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 637.3 {I3}, with I|g=3.7 {I5} (1990Sa32); 637.2 {I4}, with I|g=3.0 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0104 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 869.6 {I3}, with I|g=2.7 {I3} (1990Sa32); 870.4 {I4}, with I|g=3.1 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 775.4 {I3}, with I|g=6.4 {I5} (1990Sa32); 775.3 {I1}, with I|g=5.2 {I5} (1975To03); 775.4 {I4}, with I|g=5.2 {I6} (1981ZuZZ); all the three intensities seem too high 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0047 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M1))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 913.1 {I5}, with I|g=0.95 {I16} (1990Sa32); 913.1 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0033 {I6} for 913.2+912.8 doublet gives E2(+M1), |d>1.2; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 494.6 {I5}, with I|g=1.0 {I3} (1990Sa32); 494.6 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0028 {I14} gives D or E2; E1 preferred by level scheme. (E2) given in Table 1 of 2019MeZX could be a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1152.3 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I7} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line, unplaced 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0023 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 223.7 {I5}, with I|g=0.29 {I7}, placed from 2065 level in 1990Sa32 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.193 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0017 {I3} for 1169.5+1170.1 doublet suggests M1,E2, consistent with that expected from level scheme 
$I|g=0.04 {I3} for a 1170.9|g (1990Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?1.0|*10{+-3} {I4} 
E,RI$other: 1235.9 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line, unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 556.9 {I5}, with I|g=0.43 {I11} (1990Sa32); 556.8 {I4}, with I|g=1.33 {I13} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.019 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 692.6 {I5}, with I|g=0.46 {I16} (1990Sa32); 692.9 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I7} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp|?0.0087 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1175.2 {I5}, with I|g=0.98 {I18} (1990Sa32); 1174.3 {I4}, with I|g=1.18 {I12} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp|?1.0|*10{+-3} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$(M1,E2) from |a(K)exp=0.002 {I1}; E3 is possible but less likely, and pure M3 is ruled out; E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1385.0 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line, unplaced 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0020 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1254.5 {I5}, with I|g=0.75 {I14} (1990Sa32); 1253.5 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=6.0|*10{+-4} {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1301.8 {I5}, with I|g=0.98 {I20} (1990Sa32); 1301.2 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=7.1|*10{+-4} {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 973.5 {I5}, with I|g=0.48 {I13} (1990Sa32) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I4} for 973.4+972.2+974.5 triplet gives E2 or E1, the latter within 2|s uncertainty; E1 required from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.00215 {I20} for 1039.1+1039.8 doublet suggests dominant E2 
E,RI$line is unresolved in 1990Sa32 and 1981ZuZZ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1521.0 {I5}, with I|g=3.9 {I5} (1990Sa32); 1520.9 {I4}, with I|g=5.6 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=5.0|*10{+-4} {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1274.7 {I5}, with I|g=2.6 {I4} (1990Sa32); 1274.4 {I3}, I|g=2.7 {I6} (1975To03); 1274.5 {I4}, with I|g=2.7 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=8.0|*10{+-4} {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1316.3 {I5}, with I|g=0.62 {I14} (1990Sa32); 1314.6 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=8.5|*10{+-4} {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0104 {I10} gives M1 or E2, but inconsistent with level scheme. However, it would be consistent with the level scheme if the |a(K)exp was for the 635.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 859.5 {I5}, with I|g=1.07 {I18} (1990Sa32); 860.4 {I4}, with I|g=1.77 {I19} (1981ZuZZ); for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0016 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 871.5 {I3}, with I|g=3.2 {I4} (1990Sa32) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0019 {I4} 
RI$I|g=2.8 {I3} (1990Sa32), 3.2 (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 997.6 {I3}, with I|g=1.71 {I25} (1990Sa32); 997.3 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I7} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1152.3 {I5}, with I|g=0.43 {I16} (1990Sa32); 1252.3 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I7} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0023 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1806.0 {I5}, with I|g=7.6 {I6} (1990Sa32); 1806.2 {I3}, I|g=9.5 {I14} (1975To03); 1806.2 {I4}, with I|g=9.4 {I10} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=9.0|*10{+-4} {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 906.9 {I5}, with I|g=0.41 {I11} (1990Sa32); 906.2 {I4}, with I|g=0.30 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp<0.003 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: E|g=1040.1 {I3}, I|g=3.05 {I23} (1990Sa32); E|g=1039.4 {I4}, I|g=2.5 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.00215 {I20} for 1039.1+1039.8 doublet suggests dominant E2, but level scheme requires E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1135.5 {I5}, with I|g=0.52 {I13} (1990Sa32) is in severe disagreement; 1134.7 {I4} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.0|*10{+-3} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1187.7 {I5}, with I|g=0.46 {I18} (1990Sa32); 1189.0 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1670.3 {I5}, with I|g=0.70 {I16} (1990Sa32); 1671.0 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=4.5|*10{+-4} {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1776.5 {I5}, with I|g=11.7 {I8} (1990Sa32); 1776.5 {I2}, I|g=11.7 {I18} (1975To03); 1776.2 {I4}, with I|g=11.7 {I12} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=3.8|*10{+-4} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 912.9 {I5}, with I|g=0.68 {I13} (1990Sa32) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0033 {I6} for 912.8+913.2 doublet gives E2(+M1), |d>1.2, but E1 required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1010.7 {I3}, with I|g=2.69 {I20} (1990Sa32); 1010.3 {I4}, with I|g=2.21 {I22} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0042 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1058.0 {I5}, with I|g=1.91 {I14} (1990Sa32); 1057.7 {I4}, with I|g=1.62 {I16} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0041 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1193.7 {I5}, with I|g=0.23 {I11} (1990Sa32); 1194.2 {I4}, with I|g=1.03 {I10} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1422.7 {I5}, with I|g=2.7 {I4} (1990Sa32); 1422.1 {I4}, with I|g=3.1 {I3} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=6.0|*10{+-4} {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0063 {I25} for 819.3+819.6 doublet gives M1(+E2), |d<1.5, but E1 required from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1080.4 {I5}, with I|g=1.02 {I9} (1990Sa32); 1078.9 {I4}, with I|g=1.18 {I12} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1263.4 {I5}, with I|g=0.64 {I7} (1990Sa32); 1263.8 {I4}, with I|g=1.03 {I10} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1917.1 {I5}, with I|g=1.57 {I13} (1990Sa32); 1917.6 {I4}, with I|g=1.62 {I16} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=7.2|*10{+-4} {I5}; E2 given in Table 1 of 2019MeZX 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1189.9 {I5}, with I|g=0.30 {I13} (1990Sa32); 1189.0 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0013 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0016 {I2} 
E,RI$1990Sa32 and 1981ZuZZ report composite line at 859.5 and 860.4, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1195.7 {I5}, with I|g=0.68 {I16} (1990Sa32); 1194.2 {I4}, with I|g=1.03 {I10} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp=7.0|*10{+-4} {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1221.3 {I5}, with I|g=0.75 {I16} (1990Sa32); 1220.0 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp=7.0|*10{+-4} {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1228.4 {I5}, with I|g=0.59 {I14} (1990Sa32); 1227.5 {I4}, with I|g=0.74 {I7} (1981ZuZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.0|*10{+-3} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1376.0 {I5}, with I|g=0.68 {I23} (1990Sa32); 1375.8 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0029 {I9} gives (M1,E2); E2 from level scheme 
M$(M1) given in Table I of 2019MeZX could be a typo, since the final J|p=9/2- for 872 level is incorrect, which should be 11/2- instead, as given earlier in Table I for that level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1237.3 {I5}, with I|g=0.23 {I9} (1990Sa32); 1235.9 {I4}, with I|g=0.59 {I6} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp|?1.0|*10{+-3} {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 1384.9 {I5}, with I|g=0.23 {I11} (1990Sa32); 1385.0 {I4}, with I|g=0.89 {I9} (1981ZuZZ, unplaced) for a composite line 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.0020 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I4} for 973.4+972.2+974.5 triplet gives E2 or E1, the latter within 2|s uncertainty 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I4} for 972.2+973.4974.5 triplet gives E2 or E1, the latter within 2|s uncertainty 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$DCO probably for 965.8+966 doublet 
M$Q given by 1994Me12 inconsistent with level scheme 
$|DJ=(0) transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp is for 255.0+255.2 doublet. 1994Me12 conclude that DCO is is consistent with dominant dipole for stronger (255.2) line, while the total conversion coefficient is that for an E2 transition, but according to the level scheme it is consistent with M1+E2 for the 255.2|g and E1 for the 255.0|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for 945.8|g+946|g+947.7|g. If 947.7|g is E2 (|DJ=2 suggested by DCO), then the other two may be |DJ=1, M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from Adopted Gammas. 1979Si19 place this transition from a 3816 level, which is not reported in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.21 {I5}, which gives unacceptable B(M2)(W.u.) as compared to RUL(B(M2)(W.u.)=1. 
$POL(AD)=+0.53 {I3}, POL(exp)/POL(AD)=-0.98 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A 288.0|g was placed from a 3816 level by 1979Si19 in ({+10}B,3n|g). 288.0|g reported by 1994Me12 in ({+31}P,4n|g) deexcites 6400.4 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$DCO is also consistent with D, |DJ=0; polarization data from (|a,6n|g) also in 1991La17 indicates E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g ray reported only by 1991La17 is suspect since the expected I|g=3.2 should have been detected by 1994Me12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Positive sign in 1991La17 for pol is inconsistent with |DJ=0, E1; as positive sign either indicates |d(M2/E1)>0.8 or so, which is unlikely from RUL for M2 
$E1 in 1991La17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from branching ratio of 49- and 72- keV |g rays in (1978Al15) and I|g of 49- keV line in (1978Ke12). 1978Ke12 give I|g<4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp=18.3~{I14}, |a(L2)exp=2.3~{I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.87~{I12}, |a(M)exp=4.5~{I3} |a(N)exp=1.13~{I9} 
$ ICE(L1)=63 5, ICE(L2)=7.8 9, ICE(L3)=3.0 4, ICE(M)=15.5 11, ICE(N)=3.9 3 PER 100 DECAYS OF PARENT NUCLEI 
MR$from L1/L2 ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=2.14~{I20}, |a(L3)exp=0.09~{I3}, |a(M)exp=0.48~{I3}, |a(N)exp=0.117~{I7} 
$ ICE(L1+L2)=44 3, ICE(L3)=1.9 7, ICE(M)=9.9 7, ICE(N)=2.42 15 PER 100 DECAYS OF PARENT NUCLEI 
MR$from (L1+L2)/L3 ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$ce(L1)|?0.18, ce(L2)=13.9~{I12}, ce(L3)=17.7~{I16}, ce(M)=8.4~{I6} ce(N)=1.83~{I15} 
$ ICE(L1) |? 0.18, ICE(L2)=13.9 12, ICE(L3)=17.7 16, ICE(M)=8.4 6, ICE(N)=1.83 15 PER 100 DECAYS OF PARENT NUCLEI 
E$only seen in ce spectra 
TI$from I(|g+ce) to 99-keV level. Ice gives 42~{I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.02 quoted by 1994Pe17 has been increased to 0.10 (evaluator) in view of close doublet at 351.1 and 351.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,TI$This transition is not observed but is required by coincidence data. I|g(1+|a) is from an intensity balance and is relative to I|g(283|g)=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI,TI$The transition is not observed but is required by coincidence data. I(|g+ce) is deduced from an intensity balance and I|g is from I(|g+ce) and |a. These values are relative to I|g(431|g)=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,TI$Existence required by coincidence data. I(|g+ce) is from an intensity balance at the 283 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 256.81 {I10} (1974De21), 256.5 {I3} (1974To07), 257.1 {I1} (1975Gr35) 
M |a(K)exp=0.0258 {I21}; K/L=7.3 {I7} (1975Gr35), |a(K)exp=0.018 {I2} (1974De21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5}. An intensity balance at the 600 level requires mult(98|g) to be mainly M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6}. Intensity balance arguments require mult(207|g) to be mainly M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
TI$>105 from and intensity balance at the 1238 level, and <179 from an intensity balance at the 1212 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Unplaced by 1983Ba70, but probably the same transition as the 593|g of 1995Pe16 
M A{-2}=-0.18 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$1983Ba70 report an unplaced transition with E|g=592.6; however, the 469|g from the 3720 level is not seen by these authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
$B(M2)(W.u.)=29.2 {I+50-43}: value exceeds RUL=1 and suggests incorrect placement if J|p's are correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M (E1) is given by 1980Ab19 in |e decay, but this assignment is inconsistent with placement to a |p=(-) state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI From I(|g+ce)=100 and |a 
E From Adopted |g radiations. Measurements for the IT decay are 78 {I5} (1965Gr04), 80.9 (1967Co20), and 83 {I8} (1968Io01). The 80.7 |g observed in the {+153}Dy |e decay is presumed to be this same |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0287 (1980Ab19) 
E,RI Both 1977De05 and 1975ZuZZ report a doublet at this energy with the second component from the 1365 level, and their I|g values are 3.1 {I4} and 3.6 {I5}, respectively, for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.017 (1980Ab19) 
RI Value from 1977De05 is 0.46 {I8}, and 1975ZuZZ give I|g(350.9+351.3)=0.49 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp>0.0523 (1980Ab19) 
RI Calculated from I|g for doublet and I|g(461 |g) determined from measured I{-K} and assumed mult(461 |g)=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00077 (1980Ab19) 
RI Value from 1977De05 is 3.5 {I7}. 
M Assigned E1,E2 from ce data, but J|p's eliminate E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from (HI,xn|g). In (|a,2n|g), I|g=112. 
RI from ({+36}S,4pn|g) in (HI,xn|g), I|g=89 {I11}, relative to I|g(253.0)=100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E |g not reported in (HI,xn|g), where it should have been observed. The evaluator has chosen to show it as questionably placed. 
RI from I|g(181.5)/I|g(296.7) in (|a,2n|g) and I|g(296.7) in (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M that an M2 transition of this energy would compete with an M1 of much higher energy is unexpected. See the comment in the {+155}Dy |e decay data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of 0.128 {I13} (1987BaZB,1987BaYQ) and 0.147 {I5} (1971AkZT,1971AkZU). Other: 0.087 {I2} (1980Ab17). (All of these values are those as computed by the evaluator from the measured L-subshell ratios.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR average of 0.135 {I5} (1980Ab17) and 0.144 {I10} (1987BaZB,1987BaYQ), both values being those calculated by the evaluator from the respective L-subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E from 1971Wi24. This transition was not reported by 1980Ab17, probably being obscured by the strong 161.443 |g in their spectrum. 
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(161.3|g)/I|g(66.9|g)=1.85, as reported by 1971Wi24 in (|a,2n|g), and I|g(67.029|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated from measured Ice(K) using |d=0.19 {I3}. Ice(K)=0.178, Ice(L1)=0.024, Ice(L2)=0.006, relative to Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=1.2 {I4} for this |g. Since it is a |D|p=yes transition, this leads to mult=E1+M2, with |d=0.17 {I+4-5}. Such a large |d value seems unlikely for this (low-energy) transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI photons not observed. Value computed from Ice(K)=0.008 and the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the level scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI photons not observed. Value computed using Ice(K)=0.020 and the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the level scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E |g not placed in the level scheme by 1980Ab17 
M given as (E1) by 1980Ab17, but small value of |a(K)exp eliminates other mult assignments. Placement in level scheme also indicates mult=E1. 
CC |a(K)exp=0.021 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI photons not observed. Value computed using Ice(K)=0.012 and the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the level scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
MR |d=0.69 {I15}, computed from |a(K)exp=0.051 {I12} and the listed mult. This value seems quite large. From RUL, and the |g branching, one calculates T{-1/2}>1.7 ns for this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
MR |d=0.34 {I+6-7}, computed from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I4} and the listed mult. This value seems quite large. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2+E0)
decay_comment:
CC since |D|p=no for this transition, the large |a(K)exp value, 0.030 {I6}, is evidence for the presence of an E0 component. This conclusion, however, is based on |D|p=no, and not solely on |a(K)exp, since for |D|p=yes, mult=E1+M2, with a large |d value (as has been reported for several transitions in this nuclide) would have been proposed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI computed from Ice(K)=0.0009 and |a(K) for mult=E2. 1980Ab17 report I|g(743.64|g+743.9|g+745.2|g)=0.497 {I18} for the triplet only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI calculated from measured Ice(K)=0.004, assuming E1 mult. 1980Ab17 do not report photons corresponding to this transition, yet they report I|g values for the near-lying 248.6 and 269.3 gammas that are comparable to that deduced for this one. This may indicate that there is an admixture of M2 in this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI 1980Ab17 report I|g(743.64|g+743.9|g+745.2|g)=0.497 {I18}. From the values deduced for the other two members of this triplet, one finds that they can account for essentially all of its observed intensity. Thus, I|g(743.64) is quite small, possibly even zero. 
CC |a(K)exp>0.018, from Ice(K) and assuming that all the |g intensity in this triplet is associated with this one |g. Thus, the limit on this |a(K)exp value is a very conservative one. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of +0.36 {I5} (1977Al30), |g|g(|q); and +0.30 {I15} (1984ShZN) and +0.14 {I10} (1996KrZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.048 {I11} is consistent with mult=M2. However, the large |a(K)exp value could be evidence for an E0 component if |D|p=no were assumed. Thus, the assignment mult=M2 depends to some extent on the assumption that |D|p=yes, rather than |D|p=yes being uniquely established by the value of mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q), 1977Al30 find |d=-7 {I3} or |d=-0.43 {I13} 
CC |a(K)exp=0.0068. This value lies midway between the |a(K) values computed from these two |d's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |g|g(|q). 1977Al30 also report |d|>10. This value has not been adopted by the evaluator since it is not consistent with |a(K)exp, whereas the smaller |d value gives an |a(K)exp in good agreement with the measured one. 
CC |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of: -0.27 {I13} (1977Al30, |g|g(|q)); and -0.12 {I5} (1984ShZN) and -0.17 {I6} (1996KrZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -0.31 {I15} (1984ShZN) and -0.20 {I12} (1996KrZY). From |g|g(|q), 1977Al30 report -0.93|<|d|<-0.28. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
MR |d=0.70 {I15}, computed from |a(K)exp=0.038 {I10} and the listed mult. This value seems quite large. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI computed from Ice(K)=0.0009 and |a(K) for mult=E1. 1980Ab17 report I|g(743.65|g+743.9|g+745.2|g)=0.497 {I18} for the triplet only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M deduced from |a(K)exp=0.14 {I4}. From RUL and the |g branching, one infers that T{-1/2}>9 ns for the 1470.99 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.0014, relative to Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1 transition. 
M since this transition has |DJ=0,|D|p=no, its mult can have components of M1, E2, E0. If it were predominantly E2, the inferred I|g value, based on Ice(K), is sufficiently large relative to the near-lying gammas that it should have been seen. This suggests that mult is mainly M1, or even E0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.00069 {I9}. From nuclear-orientation studies, 1984ShZN report 0.14|<|d(M2/E1)|<1.23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M the value of |a(K)exp is sufficiently small that mult=M1 and higher multipole orders can realistically be excluded for this |g 
CC |a(K)exp=0.00047 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI the listed uncertainty (from 1980Ab17) seems unrealistically small 
MR 1984ShZN report |d(M2/E1)=0.14 {I30}. 1996KrZY report -0.16 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI photons not observed. Value computed using Ice(K)=0.0024 and the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the decay scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|g not reported in (HI,xn|g), where it should have been seen. The evaluator has chosen to show it as questionably placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g placed from a 688.3 level by 1971Wi24. However, no other evidence is found for such a level. The evaluator has placed it from this 19/2+ level, based on the level scheme established in the (HI,xn|g) reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(252)/I|g(535) in ({+7}Li,4n|g) and I|g(535) in ({+36}S,p4n|g). From ({+36}S,p4n|g), I|g<5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From L-subshell ratios in {+156}Tb IT decay (24.4 h). 
MR$M2 mixing is<0.6% (1970To11), {+156}Tb IT decay (24.4 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$For %IT=100, B(E3)(W.u.)=1.20|*10{+-5}~{I11}. This is an upper limit, since any non-zero |e+|b{++} branch will lower this value. 
M$Assignment based on K/L2/L3/M/N data from {+156}Tb IT decay (5.3 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.01~{I17}. 1982Be46 also tentatively propose that a portion of this peak deexcites the 379.0 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E The energies for the 637 and 697 |g's from this level are not consistent. From the level energies the deduced values are 636.444 {I8} and 697.321 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=3.1~{I3} (1997Ad08) 
RI other: 0.67 {I20} (1967Bl12) and 0.50 {I10} (1963Pe20). 
MR From 1963Pe20. Other: |<0.14 (1967Bl12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.28~{I3} (1997Ad08) 
RI other: 0.39 {I7} from ce(K) and |a(K)(E2). Measured I|g<0.08 (1967Bl12) and <0.09 (1963Pe20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI reference value given in 1997Ad08 as 10{+6}, but deduced by evaluator from comparison with other sets of values to be 10{+5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E unobserved, but existence proposed by 1997Ad08 
TI value deduced by evaluator to produce intensity balance at this level; a larger value would require |e feeding which is not expected since it is a 2nd forbidden decay. 1997Ad08 indicate value is |< 0.0097; their argument is not given, but is probably similar. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(E2)
decay_comment:
MR %E0 |? 6 and %E2 |? 94 (1966Fu06, 1967Bl12). 
CC From |a(K)exp=0.062 {I3}, average of 0.039 {I15} (1966Fu06), 0.072 {I+71-34} (1967Bl12), and 0.064 {I3} (1997Ad08), and |a/|a(K)=1.19; theoretical |a(K)(E2) is 0.00248 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+(E2)
decay_comment:
MR %E0 > 7% and %E2 < 93% (1967Bl12). 
CC 0.134 {I10} from |a(K)exp=0.113 {I8} (1997Ad08) and |a/|a(K)=1.19; theoretical value of |a(K)(E2) is 0.00252 {I4}; other value: >0.094 from |a(K)exp>0.079 (1967Bl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0032~{I7} (1997Ad08) 
M,MR$From |a(K)exp. Other: Assignment of E1 (1966Fu06) is inconsistent with assigned J|p, but |a limit is close to E2 value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
MR,CC If one requires an intensity balance at the 55 level and assigns a 10% uncertainty to the I{-|g} values, one can deduce |a(73)=5.8 {I10} and then |d < 0.8. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 111 {I2} (1958Go78) and 109.9 {I15} (1965Sc11). 
RI Calculated from I{-|g}(1.0+|a)=100 and |a(M3). 
M From |a{-K}(exp)=56 {I3}, |a{-L+M}(exp)=50 {I8}, and K/L=1.3 {I3} (1965Sc11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$2015Zh25 quote E1 for 65.76|g, as in {+158}Tb Adopted Gammas, based on the conversion coefficient (from intensity balance considerations), and the ratio of relative intensities of the depopulating transitions from 388.5-keV level, although the 65.76|g is not observed in 2015Zh25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Computed from the measured B(E2)|^=2.81~{I8}, from Coul. ex. 
MR$From L1/L2=5.96 {I21}, L1/L3=9.47 {I29}, and L2/L3=1.59 {I7} from {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay (1964No08 and reanalyzed by 1965Ba37). Others: +0.122 {I13} from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. (1966As02) and 0.122 {I17} from L1/L2/L3=1.0 {I1}/0.18 {I7}/0/13 {I3} from {+159}Dy |e decay (1963Ry02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$From |g(|q) in Coul. ex. (1966As02); other: +0.13 {I6}, from |g|g(|q) in {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay (1962Su04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) (1987Al07). Other: +0.2 or -10 from |g(|q) in oriented nuclei (1971Kr19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$The |d(M2/E1) values do not agree: they are < 0.03, from |g|g(|q) (1962Su04), 0.17 {I5}, from |g(|q) from oriented nuclei (1971Kr19), and 0.026 {I5} from |a{-K}(exp) (1975SeZD), all from {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay. 
BE1W$Assumes I|g(1+|a)(15.4) is negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay; other: 5.9 {I10} from (n,n'|g). 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.028 {I4} (1975SeZD); other: < 0.04 (1964Pe07), both from |a{-K}(exp) from {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay. 
BE1W$Assumes I|g(1+|a)(15.4) is negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$|d(M2/E1)=+0.06 {I+1-2} from |g(|q) from oriented {+159}Gd nuclei (1971Kr19); other: 0.00 {I5} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) (1987Al07). 
BE1W$Assumes I|g(1+|a)(15.4) is negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From Coul. ex. Other: 56 {I16}, from (n,n'|g). 
MR$Weighted average of 0.107 {I6} (1983Ch09) and 0.097 {I15} (1984Va30), both from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$In (n,n'|g), 1987Al07 argue that this placement is not correct, but the alternate placement is from a 9/2+, 536-keV level, which is not expected to be populated here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of: 4.9|*10{+-4}~{I6}, from [I(|e)(137)-I(|g+ce)(137.5|g)+I|g(210|g+226|g)/(1+|a(79.4|g)); and 2.8|*10{+-4}~{I15}, from I(|g+ce)(79.4|g) and |a(79.4|g) from 1963Ry02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance within the level scheme. From I(|g+ce)(137|g) from 1963Ry02 and |a, I|g=1.1|*10{+-4}~{I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated from I(|e)=0.00019 and I|g from {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay for |g's at 226, 305 and 363~keV, with all assumed to be E1's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From Coul. ex., I|g(225)/I|g(121)=0.72, which would give I|g(225)=56. But this value and the contribution to the 225 |g from the decay of the 363 level is not sufficient to account for the observed intensity. (See the comment for the other placement of this |g.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$In {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay I|g(225)/I|g(363)=0.0184, which would give I|g(225)=18.4. But this value and the contribution to the 225 |g from the decay of the 362 level is not sufficient to account for the observed intensity. (See the comment for the other placement of this |g.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$In the {+159}Gd |b{+-} decay, I|g(274)/I|g(237)=0.74, so most of this intensity may be from another placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$The measured values 21.6 {I14} (1983Ch09) and 32.0 {I15} (1990Le17) disagree. The listed value is a simple average of these two. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI intensity imbalance in (n,|g) at this level indicates the existence of an unobserved depopulating transition, most likely to the 133 level. E|g is from the level-energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
RI since the intensity of the 6-keV |g also deexciting this level is not known, the relative branching associated with this |g is not known. Thus, no relative I|g value is shown. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M reported by 1974Ke01 to be E1 or M1 from |a(L2)exp. Placement in the level scheme suggests the latter alternative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from L1/M=3.0 {I5} (1959Sc29) and |a(K)exp=15 {I3} (1959Sc29) and 13.5 {I30} (1976Hn01 who used ce data of 1959Sc29). From theory, |a=11.51 and |a(K)=9.67 for M1. 
CC values deduced by evaluator who assumes |a and |a(K) are both anomolous by the ratio |a(K)exp/|a(K)theory=1.40. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from K/L|?2.0 and |a(K)exp=5.3 (1959Sc29) 
MR The expected E2 component in this intraband cascade transition was computed by the evaluator using the Alaga rules (1955Al58) and the intensity of the crossover (133.68) E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 1974OkZW; authors report only smaller of the two values from the analysis based on |a(K)exp|?0.22 (1959Sc29) which implies predominately M1. M1 also deduced by 1976Hn01 from |a(K)exp based on ce data of 1959Sc29, but |a(K)exp value is not reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 1974OkZW; authors report only smaller of the two values from the analysis based on |a(K)exp=0.10 and K/L|>6.3 (1959Sc29) which imply predominately M1. E2+M1 is reported by 1976Hn01 from |a(K)exp based ce data of 1959Sc29 which might support larger |d value, but |a(K)exp value is not reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from K/L=5.5 and |a(K)exp=0.22 (1959Sc29). E1 also deduced by 1976Hn01 from |a(K)exp based on ce data of 1959Sc29, but |a(K)exp value is not reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.041 (1959Sc29). E1 also deduced by 1976Hn01 from |a(K)exp based on ce data of 1959Sc29, but |a(K)exp value is not reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.018 (1959Sc29). E1 also deduced by 1976Hn01 from |a(K)exp based on ce data of 1959Sc29, but |a(K)exp value is not reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.10 (1959Sc29). E1 also deduced by 1976Hn01 from |a(K)exp based on ce data of 1959Sc29, but |a(K)exp value is not reported. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 39.1 {I2} (1982Ge07) and 38.8 {I2} (1970Ch02). 
RI$average of 9 {i2} (1982Ge07) and 14 {i3} (1970Ch02). 
M,CC$|a value deduced by evaluator (with code BrIccMixing) from intensity balance at 39 level from current decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) for 55 {I2}. For E|g=55 {I4}, value is 12 {I10} as E|g is within 1 keV of K-shell binding energy of 51.996 keV. 2017Gu08 list 12.28 {I18} 
$This |g may correspond to the 50.3-keV |g proposed by 1998Ic02 in {+165}Tb as associated with the |b decay of {+165}Gd to {+165}Tb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) for 55 {I2}. For E|g=55 {I4}, value is 12 {I10} as E|g is within 1 keV of K-shell binding energy of 51.996 keV. 2017Gu08 list 12.28 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$The authors suggest E1 multipolarity, based on the observed weak intensities for the K X rays, but the assignment is tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 52 in 2014YoZZ 
$2017Gu08 give |a(theory)=13.54 {I19} for mult(53)=M1 from BrIcc, assuming no uncertainty for E|g. Using |DE|g=4 keV, BrIcc gives |a=14 {I11}, as the K-shell binding energy is 51.996 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$73|g was observed by 2017Gu08 as self-coincident |g ray, also in coincidence with Tb K x-rays, but not in coincidence with 147|g 
$2017Gu08 give |a(theory)=5.44 {I8} for mult(73)=M1 from BrIcc, assuming no uncertainty for E|g. Using |DE|g=4 keV, BrIcc gives |a=5.4 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 73.6 in 2014YoZZ 
$2017Gu08 give |a(theory)=0.694 {I10} for mult(73)=E1 from BrIcc, assuming no uncertainty for E|g. Using |DE|g=4 keV, BrIcc gives |a=0.69 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other 147.4 in 2014YoZZ 
$2017Gu08 give |a(theory)=0.1067 {I15} for mult(147)=E1 from BrIcc, assuming no uncertainty for E|g. Using |DE|g=4 keV, BrIcc gives |a=0.107 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$ |DJ=0 transition. If gate is on |DJ=2,Q, then measured DCO is inconsistence with pure dipole (compiler's note) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.77 {I5} 
M$assumed by evaluators. Mult=M1 from fig. 4 of 2001Ro15 is inconsistent with the level scheme (fig. 2), where transition connects levels of the opposite parity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
DCO=0.7 {I1} 
M$assumed by evaluators. Mult=M1 from fig. 4 of 2001Ro15 is inconsistent with the level scheme (fig. 2), where transition connects levels of the opposite parities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$According to table 1 (2001Ro15) transition from J|p=18+, however in fig. 2 from J|p=18-. Apparently, it is a typo in the table 1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$from 1975To04 who compare the 678.4-keV transition with the 721-keV transition in {+145}Gd for which |a(K)exp was determined by 1970Ep02 and was shown to be compatible with M4, and from well established systematics of the N=81 isotones (1985To11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$calculated from I(|g+ce)(21.5) in ({+60}Ni,xpn|g) from transition balance between the 2659 and 2681 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$calculated from I(|g+ce)(21.5) obtained from transition balance between the 2659 and 2681 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1073.1 {I2} from {+149}Ho |e decay (21.1 s), 1073.2 {I1} from {+149}Dy IT decay (0.490 s), 1073.2 {I3} from ({+32}S,3n|g), and 1073.2 {I2} from (|a,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,7n|g) and ({+32}S,3n|g). 
M$also supported by |g(|q) in (|a,7n|g) and |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+32}S,5n|g) with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1336.8 {I3} from ({+32}S,3n|g) and 1337.2 {I4} from (|a,7n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,7n|g), with |DJ=(2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 255.7 {I3} from ({+32}S,3n|g) and 255.0 {I2} from (|a,7n|g) 
RI$others: 107 {I30} from ({+16}O,3n|g), |?33 from (|a,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1393.0 {I3} from ({+32}S,3n|g) and 1393.7 {I5} from (|a,7n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I10} from ({+16}O,3n|g), 100 {I22} from (|a,7n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2002Go06 in ({+16}O,p7n|g); a 1143.6|g placed to feed the 13116 level by 1996Gu17 in ({+32}S,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$relative intensity=91 {I9} (1980Da18) 
M$from |a(K)exp and |g|g(|q) 
$|a(IPF)/T=3.35|*10{+-6} {I5} 
$(298.6|g)(1178.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.05 {I7} (1976St01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$for fully-ionized atom, I|g|?100 per 100 decays of the isomer with T{-1/2}=11 s {I1} (2003Li42); since internal conversion is not allowed for bare atoms 
RI$relative intensity|?3 
M$|a(L)exp=13 {I5} (1980Da18), 16 {I4} (1987BaZV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placed from the 6893 level by 2002Go06 in ({+16}O,p7n|g), which is recommended in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1073.1 {I2} (1994Me13) and 1073.3 {I1} (1979To01). Other: 1073.2 (1982Ba75) 
RI$others: I(1073|g)/I(1091|g)=13 {I1}/100 (1979To01), 15/100 (1982Ba75) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1090.7 {I2} (1994Me13) and 1090.1 {I1} (1979To01). Other: 1090.8 (1982Ba75) 
RI$quoted uncertainty of |?0.2% in 1994Me13 is unrealistically low; it has been increased by a factor of 10 by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 803.3~{I2} ({+150}Ho |e decay (23.3~s)), 803.7~{I1} ({+150}Ho |e decay (72~s)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 653.3~{I3} ({+150}Ho |e decay (23.3~s)), 653.41~{I19} ({+150}Ho |e decay (72~s)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$the evaluators assume that a peak in 1979Ha29 labeled as 504~keV is a mixed peak of 503- and 504-keV |g-rays since 1980LuZV show the 503 transition to be twice as intense as the 504. If the 504 is seen, then the 503 should also be seen since it is below the 504 in a direct |g-ray cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$1979Ha29 do not identify a 742 peak but the published spectrum contains an unlabled 743-keV peak which could have a 742-keV componant related to this transition. The transition directly above this one in the decay scheme is identified by 1979Ha29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$this transition was observed only in ce spectra (1979Pi07). 
M$from L/(M+n) ratio and intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$for ordering of the 264- and 25-keV transitions see comment on 6007-keV level in the (HI,xn|g) level table (general comment section) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,E2
decay_comment:
BM1W=4.9E-3 7, BE1W=3.6E-4 5, BE2W=76 17 
M$from T{-1/2}. 1979Pi07 suggest dipole character on the basis of T{-1/2}, but E2 cannot be ruled out 
E$this transition was observed only in ce spectra (1979Pi07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$522.4 (1988Ra19). 1993FoZY did not find any evidence for a 522.4|g. They assigned the 577|g as the lowest energy transition in the SD cascade and assigned the 577|g as the 51/2 to 47/2 transition. An intensity plot (fig. 11b) by 1994Tw01 also shows the first transition (most likely 577|g) as 51/2 to 47/2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.14~{I1}, A{-4}=-0.02~{I3} (1979Li14) for a composite line 
A2=-0.24 4, A4=+0.12 4 (1979Fl05) FOR A COMPOSITE LINE 
$|d(Q/D)=-5.7~{I+17-28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.14~{I3}, A{-4}=-0.02~{I3} 
A2=-0.201 18, A4=+0.021 23 (1979Fl05) 
$|d(Q/D)=-3.1~{I+9-18} (1979Fl05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.08~{I3}, A{-4}=+0.03~{I5}. Pol=+0.40~{I7} 
M$from linear polarization by 1981Ha17. 1979Pi07 assigned M1 but later remeasured the conversion electron spectra and reassigned it as E1 (see footnote in 1981Kl05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$It is not certain whether this is the isomeric transition. See comment on 6007.2 level in the level table (general comment section) 
M$from lifetime value, if this is the isomeric transition in (1979Pi07). However, E2 cannot be ruled out (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.17~{I5}, A{-4}=0.00~{I7} 
A2=-0.14 9, A4=+0.09 10 (1979Li14) 
M$1981Ha17 and 1985Ho17 suggest magnetic character on the basis of lifetime. However, E1 character cannot be ruled out (evaluator). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(124.8|g)/I|g(1083.2|g)=8.2/57.4 (communicated to the evaluator by one of the authors of 1981Ha17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$522.4 (1988Ra19). 1993FoZY did not find any evidence for a 522.4|g, they assigned the 577|g as the lowest energy transition in the SD cascade and assigned the 577|g as 51/2 to 47/2 transition. An intensity plot (fig. {+11}B) by 1994Tw01 also shows the first transition (most likely 577|g) as 51/2 to 47/2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From 1987St15 but not confirmed by 1989Zu01 even though the 625|g is 3 to 4 times stronger than in the work of 1987St15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From 1990Sa32. Others: 118~{I6} (1982Ba75), 97.7 (1989Ga11). from the decay scheme, I|g|<I|g(614|g)=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,M$1982Ba75 place this transition from a 3512 level and assign mult=M1. 1989Ga11 report E2. |DJ=2 from the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,M$1982Ba75 place this transition from a 4046 level and assign mult=E2. 1989Ga11 report M1. |DJ=1 from the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,M$1982Ba75 place this transition from a 2788 level and assign mult=E2. 1989Ga11 report (M1). |DJ=1 from the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,M$1982Ba75 place this transition from a 3879 level and assign mult=M1. 1989Ga11 report E2. |DJ=2 from the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Includes value from 1974Sc19. Other: 492.2~{I1} (1979To09) 
RI$From 1990Sa32. Others: 78~{I6} (1982Ba75), 67 (1989Ga11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$From 1982Ba75. The value of 1990Sa32, 745.7~{I2}, May be a misprint. 1989Ga11 report 746.5 and from (HI,xn|g) one has 746.5~{I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Reported only by 1982Ba75 but placement agrees with that in (HI,xn|g); however, I|g is such that this transition should have been seen by 1989Ga11 and 1990Sa32 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0066~{I6} (1979Ja14). Other: A{-2}=+0.22~{I5}, A{-4}=-0.10~{I6} for the unresolved 646.8|g+647.35|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.016 (1979Ja14). E1 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=-0.35~{I14}, A{-4}=-0.10~{I17} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.099~{I10} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.46~{I9}, A{-4}=-0.09~{I12} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0115~{I10} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.25~{I5}, A{-4}=-0.09~{I7} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0059~{I15} (1979Ja14). DCO=1.10~{I7} (2000Sm03). Other: A{-2}=+0.33~{I9}, A{-4}=-0.30~{I12} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0087~{I10} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.37~{I5}, A{-4}=-0.12~{I8} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$See comment on J{+|p}(3160 level). 1979Ja14 report A{-2}=-0.16~{I4}, A{-4}=-0.23~{I6} for the unresolved 254|g's from the 3160 and 5342 levels. 1983St03 report mult=E2. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00029~{I+8-6}, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.6~{I+7-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0062~{I5} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.21~{I7}, A{-4}=-0.21~{I10} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035~{I8} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.21~{I8}, A{-4}=-0.17~{I11} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0031~{I5} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.30~{I7}, A{-4}=+0.03~{I10} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0090~{I15} (1979Ja14). E2 from 1983St03. Other: A{-2}=+0.54~{I11}, A{-4}=-0.17~{I15} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$In 1979Ja14, the 604|g is unresolved from an impurity component. 1983St03 report mult=M1 from |a(K)exp, and 1981Ha17 report mult=D from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average from 1980Na04, 1981Ha17, and 2000sm0 
M$From intensity balance at the 5035 level (1981Ha17, 1980Na04) and from I|g/I(K| x ray) and I|g/I(L| x ray) (1980Na04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1 from 1983St03. Lin pol=-0.18~{I7} (1979Me01). Other: A{-2}=-0.270~{I15}, A{-4}=+0.010~{I17} (1979Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.13~{I6}, A{-4}=-0.12~{I9} (1979Ja14). A{-2}=-0.078~{I14}, A{-4}=-0.009~{I20}, lin pol=+0.10~{I4} (1979Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.142~{I17}, A{-4}=-0.005~{I20}, lin pol=+0.24~{I17} (1979Me01). A{-2}=-0.09~{I8}, A{-4}=-0.27~{I10} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.08~{I4}, A{-4}=+0.02~{I4}, lin pol=+0.31~{I9} (1979Me01), A{-2}=+0.19~{I4}, A{-4}=0.00~{I4}, lin pol=+0.40~{I12} (1971Ha17). E2 from |a(K)exp (1987Ri02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.31~{I7}, A{-4}=-0.19~{I10} (1979Ja14). A{-2}=+0.295~{I17}, A{-4}=-0.05~{I3}, lin pol=+0.51~{I11} (1979Me01). A{-2}=+0.20~{I4}, A{-4}=+0.02~{I5}, lin pol=+0.42~{I12} (1981Ha17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.358~{I22}, A{-4}=-0.093~{I23}, lin pol=+0.88~{I19} (1979Me01). A{-2}=+0.20~{I5}, A{-4}=0.00~{I5} (1981Ha17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.22~{I5}, A{-4}=+0.02~{I5}, lin pol=+0.32~{I14} (1979Me01). A{-2}=-0.36~{I3}, A{-4}=+0.07~{I6}, lin pol=+0.30~{I11} (1981Ha17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) and RUL (1981Ha17) 
M$A{-2}=+0.40~{I13}, A{-4}=-0.00~{I16} (1981Ha17). B(E2)(W.u.)|?290 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}, P=-0.27 {I18} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} and intensity considerations (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}, P=+0.33 {I11} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1}, |a(K)exp=0.058 {I5} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.0 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.0 {I2} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.29 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I7}, |a(K)exp=0.058 {I14} (1979Ja14) 
MR$From |a(K)exp (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}, P=+0.49 {I29} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.0165 (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M1))
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1979Ja14 as a singlet, but could include transition from 2453 level reported by 1979Ja14. 
M$A{-2}=+0.42 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I16} (1977Kl04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.60 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.36 {I12}, P=-0.13 {I29} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=-0.71 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.32 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.0101 {I20} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1977Kl04 as a singlet, but could include transition from 1753 level reported by 1979Ja14. 
M$A{-2}=+0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I4}, |a(K)exp=0.0122 {I15} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}, P=+0.40 {I34} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.32 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.0121 {I15} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1979Ja14 as a singlet, but could include transition from 1521 level reported by 1977Kl04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.28 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.2 {I2} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=-0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.031 {I10} (1979Ja14, |a(K)exp probably disturbed by contaminations from other transitions) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1977Kl04 as a singlet, but could include transition from 2194 level reported by 1979Ja14. 
M$A{-2}=+0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I8} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.52 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.26 {I15}, |a(K)exp=0.028 {I7} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5}, P=+0.4 {I4} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I10} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1979Ja14 as a singlet, but could include transition from 1963 level reported by 1977Kl04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.30 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.0 {I2} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.058 {I14} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.14 {I20}, A{-4}=0.0 {I3} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.48 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I12}, |a(K)exp=0.24 {I6} (1979Ja14, |a(K)exp probably disturbed by contaminations from other transitions). |a(K)exp indicate M2 character but such a transition cannot compete with E2, 462|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.43 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.0 {I1} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.50{I5}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.018 {I6} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1979Ja14 as a singlet, but could include transition from 3075 level reported by 1977Kl04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.23 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I11} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.0071 {I15} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1977Kl04 as a singlet, but could include transition from 2746 level reported by 1979Ja14. 
M$A{-2}=+0.35 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I20} (1977Kl04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI Reported in 1979Ja14 as a singlet, but could include transition from 3079 level reported by 1977Kl04. 
M$A{-2}=+0.32 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I20} (1977Kl04); A{-2}=0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.066 {I15} (1979Ja14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$R{-asym}=1.20 {I5}, P=+0.40 {I12} for 440.7|g and 441.3|g 
M ce data imply E2 but J|p's require E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 1988CuZY places this 659.6 |g from 4486 level and the 657.9 |g from this level, but this may be a typographical error; 1991Zh35 places the 659.6 |g here. 
M$R{-asym}=1.23 {I7}, P=+0.58 {I16}, P for 657.9|g and 659.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E See comment on 659.6 |g from 3829 level. 
M$R{-asym}=1.21 {I9}, P=+0.58 {I16}, P for 657.9|g and 659.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$R{-asym}=1.35 {I5}, P=+0.52 {I10} for 608.1|g and 609.0|g 
M$E2 |g not supported by |DJ=1 from levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$R{-asym}=1.71 {I5}, P=+0.72 {I15} for 837.1|g and 837.4|g 
E,M 1988CuZY places 837.4 |g from level at 6947 keV with mult=(E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$R{-asym}=2.00 {I25}, P=+0.85 {I20} for 869.2|g and 869.3|g 
E,M 1988CuZY places 869.2 |g from level at 8450 keV with mult=(E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 334.6 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 334.6 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), 334.30 {I3} from ({+36}S,4n|g), and 334.44 {I10} from (|p{+-},11n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 326.1 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 326.2 {I3} from ({+36}S,4n|g). Other: 326 {I12} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 412.4 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 412.4 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), 412.20 {I3} from ({+36}S,4n|g), 412.5 {I1} from ({+3}He,4n|g), and 411.97 {I9} from (|p{+-},11n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 244.3 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 245.46 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2,M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 570.6 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 570.7 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), and 570.71 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 905.3 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 905.2 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), and 905.29 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 
RI$Note that I|g(905.3|g)/I|g(244.2|g)=2.0 from the heavy-ion data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 366.2 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 367.1 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 692.6 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 692.82 {I15} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 477.1 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), 476.90 {I4} from ({+36}S,4n|g), and 477.2 {I1} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 346.7 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 346.5 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), and 346.71 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2,M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 504.9 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 504.86 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 
RI$Note that I|g(504.3|g)/I|g(346.6|g)=0.20 from the heavy-ion data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 587.5 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 587.3 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), and 587.75 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 
RI From {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min). Other: 52 {I8} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 999.8 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min), 999.7 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), and 999.82 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 415.8 {I4} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 415.26 {I16} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 695.3 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 695.82 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1108.0 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 1108.05 {I15} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 798.9 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.76 min) and 798.9 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 406.9 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 407.07 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 434.7 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 435.13 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 
RI From {+154}Tb |e decay (3.25 min). Other: 105 {I19}, from 1974Ba07, and 20, from 2002MaZM, both in {+122}Sn({+36}S,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 405.8 {I4} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 405.68 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 992.9 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 993.14 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 523.8 {I1} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min), 523.50 {I4} from ({+36}S,4n|g), and 523.7 {I1} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 661.5 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 661.60 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1138.5 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 1138.69 {I16} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 740.6 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 740.60 {I7} from ({+36}S,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 443.4 {I2} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 443.47 {I13} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 959.1 {I3} from {+154}Ho |e decay (3.10 min) and 959.31 {I14} from ({+3}He,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI Measured I|g=1.3 {I2} for doubly placed |g, decomposed by evaluator based on data from {+154}Ho |e decay (11.8 m). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M,MR from ce data in {+155}Ho |e decay, mult=M1+E2 with |d=0.07 {I+3-2} is deduced. This is inconsistent with the adopted J|p values for the two levels involved. See the comments for this |g in the {+155}Ho |e Decay data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1090 {I+440-140} value exceeds RUL(E2)=300 by a factor of 3.4; RUL(E2) suggests |d(E2/M1) should be about <0.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI RELATIVE TO THE RI VALUES OF THE OTHER G RAYS OBSERVED TO DEEXCITE THIS LEVEL, RI(102.16G) AS REPORTED BY 1979Ab18 IS A FACTOR OF ROUGHLY 2 LARGER THAN THAT REPORTED BY 1970Bo02 (^see THE TABLE ABOVE). WHILE THIS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED AS EVIDENCE THAT THE 102 G IN THE WORK OF 1979Ab18 IS A DOUBLET, WE HAVE CHOSEN TO ASSUME THAT TH FULL STRENGTH OF THIS G AS REPORTED BY 1979Ab18 IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DECAY OF THE 234.33 LEVEL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of: 0.212 {I6}, from L- and M-subshell ratios (1975GrYW); 0.239 {I13} (1979Al31), 0.216 {I4} (1986GrZQ), and 0.227 {I3} (1987BaZB), from L-subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of: 0.108 {I17}, from L- and M-subshell ratios (1975GrYW); and 0.118 {I12}, from L-subshell ratios (1979Al31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI the listed value was deduced from the measured values I(K|a{-1}| x ray)=306 {I30} and I(K|a{-2}| x ray)+I|g(45.4|g)=207 {I20}, together with I(K|a{-2}| x ray)/I(K|a{-1}| x ray)=0.559. Using a somewhat different I(K|a{-2}| x ray)/I(K|a{-1}| x ray) value (|?0.53), 1979Ab18 deduce I|g=45 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI computed from |a and I(|g+ce) 
This transition is assumed by the evaluator to be distinct from the 22.15 |g presumed to deexcite the 224.5 level. No 22.15-keV photons are observed. The values Ice(L1)=2, Ice(L2)=0.8, reported to be associated with the 22.15 |g and not characteristic of a pure E2 transition, are presumed to be largely due to the other 22.15 |g. 
TI deduced by the evaluator from I(|g+ce)(79.7|g)=1.0 {I2}, which must equal the I(|g+ce) value of this transition, according to the decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Photons not observed. 1979Ab18 report Ice(L1)=2, Ice(L2)=0.8, relative to Ice(K)=2.56 for the prominent 240.19 E1 transition. 
MR from Ice(L1)/Ice(L2)=4.0, the evaluator computes mult=M1+E2, with |d=0.07 {I+3-2}. The L1/L2 ratio used was 4.0, which differs from that (=2.5) given by 1979Ab18, since their Ice(L2) value includes a contribution from the "other" 22.15 |g, which, as placed in the level scheme, deexcites the 154.6 level and must have mult=E2. From the I(|g+ce) value of this latter transition and |a(L2), Ice(L2)=0.3 is deduced, leaving 0.5 units for the 22.15 |g deexciting the 224.53 level. (Note that the contribution of this other 22.15 |g to the L1 is negligible.) however, the placement of this transition requires mult=E2. The evaluator has chosen to adopt the listed J|p value, which leaves the discrepancy with this mult and |d value unexplained. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Photons not observed. 1979Al31 and 1979Ab18 report Ice(M1)=7, Ice(M2)=6, Ice(M3)|?1 (relative to Ice(K)=2.56 for the prominent 240.19 E1 transition) and 1975GrYW report Ice(M1)=50, Ice(M2)=10, Ice(M3)=5 and Ice(N1)=10. 
RI$calculated from the listed |a and I(|g+ce) values 
MR$weighted average of the values calculated by evaluator from conversion electron subshell ratios listed above (with 10% relative unc): 0.0212 {I+22-20} (1979Al31) and 0.0169 {I20} (1975GrYW) 
CC$since this E|g value is quite close to the binding energy of the L1 subshell (9.05 keV), there is a question as to whether or not L1 conversion occurs for this transition. The listed |a value was computed by the evaluator assuming that (1) L1 conversion does take place, (2) |a(M)/|a(L)=0.22, a value typical for M1,E2 transitions in this energy and Z region, (3) |a(N+..)/|a(M)=0.33, (4) |d=0.0189 for this |DJ=1, |D|p=no transition, and M-tot=90.5 for the 9.1 |g 
TI value chosen to reproduce the relative I|g values of the 138 and 147 (and 79) gammas observed in the decay of this level, studied as a 6-|ms isomer (1970Bo02). The listed uncertainty in this value is an estimate by the evaluator which reflects the range of I(|g+ce) over which these relative I|g values can be reasonably well reproduced. This choice of I(|g+ce) appears to conflict with other available data. From the M-conversion-electron intensities of 1979Al31, one computes I(|g+ce)=19, neglecting L conversion. Including L conversion, as discussed in conjunction with the |a value for this transition, one calculates I(|g+ce)=84. This latter value is much too large, since it leads to an unacceptably poor intensity balance at the 225.28 level. From intensity-balance considerations at the 225.28 level, assuming no |e+|b{++} feeding, one computes I(|g+ce)(9.1|g)=14 (which is thus an upper limit). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M mult=E1, from L-subshell ratios (1979Ab18). Note that this transition is the one which serves as the normalization point for the electron and |g-ray intensity scales. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI deduced by the evaluator from Ice(K)=0.6 and |a(K). 1979Ab18 report I|g(100.84|g+101.34|g)=0.8 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI deduced by the evaluator from Ice(K)=0.8 and |a(K). 1979Ab18 report I|g(100.84|g+101.34|g)=0.8 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.08, as reported by 1972To07. 1979Ab18 quote mult=E1, but list no Ice data for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
1979Al31 show this |g as being questionably placed here but also as deexciting the 557.5 level. 1979Ab18, however, show it as deexciting this level and not the 557.5 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI deduced by the evaluator from Ice(K)=4 and |a(K) for a pure M1 transition. 1979Ab18 report I|g(160.76|g+160.82|g+161.08|g)=9.3 {I9}, while 1979Al31 report I|g(160.55|g+160.76|g+161.08|g)=10 {I3}. Presumably the 160.55 |g should also have been included in the summed I|g value of 1979Ab18. For mult=[M1,E2] for this 160.76 |g, the summed |g intensity for this multiplet is 13.5 {I24}, somewhat larger than the measured value. For a pure M1, however, the sum is 11.5 {I16}. The evaluator has assumed that this transition is, at least largely, M1. 
CC value for a pure M1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI deduced by the evaluator from Ice(K)=0.04 and |a(K) for an E1 transition. 1979Ab18 report I|g(369.10|g+369.30|g)=6.5 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=3.6 {I8}, the evaluator computes mult=M1+E2, with |d=0.9 {I+9-5}. However, placement requires |D|p=yes. Note that the placement of this |g is questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M mult reported as E1, but this is inconsistent with the placement. Note that this placement is questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g (369.10|g)=4.5 {I9} and I|g(369.10|g+369.30|g)=6.5 {I3} (1979Ab18). 
M from Ice(K)=0.20 and the deduced I|g value, one obtains |a(K)exp=0.10 {I+10-4}. The placement in the level scheme indicates mult=M1,E2. Since |a(K)=0.056 and 0.027 for M1 and E2, respectively, the deduced |a(K)exp value indicates a preference for M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
1979Al31 show this |g as deexciting this level. However, 1979Ab18 place it as a |g deexciting the 349.0 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
DCO=0.6 {I2} 
E ordering of this transition within this band is uncertain. If the present placement is incorrect, the associated level energy will have to be changed accordingly. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E ordering of this transition within this band is uncertain. If the present placement is incorrect, the associated level energy will have to be changed accordingly. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M Based on |a(K)exp=0.46 (1966La11) and 0.45 (1976Gr20); K/L=1.8 {I5} (1960Gr24), 1.42 (1961Ba32), and 1.69 (1966La11); L1/L2=0.41 (1966GrZX) and 0.37 {I2} (1987BaYQ); L1/L3=0.41 (1966GrZX) and 0.40 {I2} (1987BaYQ), all from {+156}Ho |e decay. Also from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E From in-beam study; 266.55 10 from EC decay. 
M Based on |a(K)exp=0.064 (1966La11), 0.075 (1976Gr20), and 0.069 {I3} (1977De28); K/L=3.0 {I4} (1960Gr24), 2.0 (1961Ba32), 3.6 (1966GrZX), and 3.21 (1966La11), together with L subshell ratios (1960Gr24,1966GrZX,1987BaYQ), all from {+156}Ho |e decay. Also from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI Measured I|g<9 (1976Gr20, |e decay), but |g is an E0. 
M Based on observation of ce and lack of observation of |g in {+156}Ho |e decay (1976Gr20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M From {+156}Ho |e decay: |a(K)exp=0.023 (1966La11) and 0.030 (1976Gr20); K/L=5.1 {I8} (1960Gr24), 2.8 (1961Ba32), 4.4 (1966GrZX) and 4.0 (1966La11); L subshell ratios (1960Gr24,1966GrZX); |a(K)exp= 0.0287 {I16} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). Also |g(|q) from (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay. Value from (|a,4n|g) is 89, but includes a {+157}Dy impurity. 
M Based on |a(K)exp=0.019 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay, and 0.029 {I3} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=0.036 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay, and 0.024 {I4} (1977De28), (p,4n|g) 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.026 and |a/|a(K). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0(+M1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)|*10{+3}=8~{I5}. Value computed by the evaluator assuming no M1 component in the 752 transition. E0 components in the |DJ=0 transitions between |g-vibrational states and members of the g.s. band are not expected, suggesting that the make-up of this band is more than simply a |g vibration. 
BE2W$Calculated assuming a pure E2 mult. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.0065 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay and 0.0075 {I13} (1977De28), from (p,4n|g). If |a(K)exp is assumed to result from a M1,E2 admixture only, one computes |d{+2}=0.82, which seems unreasonably large for a transition between a |g band and a gs band. 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.0072 and |a/|a(K), assuming no M1 component. 
CC For an E2 G, CC=0.00566. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay. From I(ce) and |a for [M1,E2], I|g=7.2; in (|a,4n|g) value is 57% of I|g(618), but also 65% of I|g(884). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay; value from (|a,4n|g) is 115. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.0075 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Calculated assuming a pure E2 mult. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.043 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay and 0.0324 {I19} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.030 and |a/|a(K). 
CC For an E2 G, CC=0.00705. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$From ce data in {+156}Ho |e decay (1976Gr20). 
RI$From 2002Ca49, {+156}Ho |e decay. Value from (|a,4n|g) is 515. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E From {+156}Ho |e decay. Value from (p,4n|g) is 279.22 {I21}. 
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay. Value from (p,4n|g) is |<415. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.062 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2,M1
decay_comment:
M Based on |a(K)exp=0.0072 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay. Value from (p,4n|g) is 0.0082 {I12} (1977De28). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.0080 and |a/|a(K). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay; value from (|a,4n|g) is |<73. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.044 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay, and |g(|q) (1988Ri09), (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.012 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay, and 0.0090 {I22} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From: |a(K)exp=0.0029 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay; 0.0034 {I5} (1977De28), (p,4n|g); and |g(|q) (1988Ri09), (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Assigned to a 554.03 |g by 1976Gr20, previously placed from a 3071.7 level. If this association is correct, then J{+|p}=2+ uniquely for the 1382.3 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Calculated assuming a pure E2 mult. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.058 (1976Gr20), {+156}Ho |e decay, and 0.0344 {I21} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.040 and |a/|a(K). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Suggested to be E0+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0120~{I22} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). However, uncertainty in split of the intensity between the two placements casts doubt on this. Note also that an E0 component in a |DJ=0 transition between a member of a |g-vibrational band and a member of a g.s. band is not expected. However, such a component is apparently observed in the deexcitation of the 2+ bandhead, suggesting that this band may be more than simply a |g band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay; value from (|a,4n|g) is 75, but it is doubly placed. 
M$Assigned E1 in {+156}Ho |e decay and in (p,4n|g), but |g may be a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From {+156}Ho |e decay. 
M$Assigned E1 in {+156}Ho |e decay and in (p,4n|g), but |g may be a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$In {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g), this |g is reported to be|?2.2 times as strong as the other |g (958.4~keV) deexciting this level (1988Ri09). 
M From |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I4} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28), but line is mixed, and |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Calculated assuming a pure E2 mult. 
RI From (|a,4n|g), value is 65 {I10}. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.041 {I6} in (|a,4n|g) (1977De28) and |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.041 and |a/|a(K). 
CC For an E2 G, CC=0.00818. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From (p,4n|g). 
RI$From 2002Ca49, {+156}Ho |e decay. From (p,4n|g), I|g=100~{I25}. 
M Assigned as M1 from |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I14} in (p,4n|g), E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0024 in {+156}Ho |e decay, and (E1) from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=0.009 {I4} (1977De28), (p,4n|g). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.009 and |a/|a(K). 
CC For an E2 |g, CC=0.00586. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g), I|g(975.2|g)/I|g(462.4|g)=0.76. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.025 {I11} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28), but |g is doubly placed. E2,M1 from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(362|g)/I|g(1046|g) in {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g). From (p,4n|g), this ratio is 80~{I13}. 
M From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). Assigned E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp=0.006 {I4} in (p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=0.0031 {I12} (1977De28), (p,4n|g), mult=E2,M1. Other: assigned as (E1) from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
BE2W$Calculated assuming a pure E2 mult. 
RI$From {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g), I|g=7 {I1}. From (p,4n|g), I|g=21~{I4}. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.051 {I10} (1977De28), (p,4n|g), and E2,M1 from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). 
CC Computed from |a(K)exp=0.051 and |a/|a(K). 
CC For an E2 G, CC=0.0100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g), I|g(439|g)/I|g(975|g)=450. 
M From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09); E2,M1 from |a(K)exp=0.029 {I16} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E From (HI,xn|g). In (p,4n|g), E|g=975.8 {I3}, but |g there is doubly placed. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I11} in (p,4n|g), mult=(E2), but |g there is doubly placed (1977De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From 1988Ri09, (HI,xn|g). |g is doublet in (p,4n|g). 
M From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09) and |a(K)exp(391.14+393.39)=0.028 {I4} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$From (p,4n|g) (1977De28), I|g=43 {I8}. From {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g), I|g=38~{I4}. 
M From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09). M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I22} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g). In (p,4n|g), I|g=116, but |g is doubly placed. 
M From |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28), mult=(E2), but |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$From {+148}Nd({+12}C,4n|g). 
M From |a(K)exp=0.0082 {I25} in (p,4n|g) (1977De28), mult=E2, but |g is doubly placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From 1988Ri09, (HI,xn|g). From (p,4n|g), 1977De28 report E|g=638.50~{I21}. 
M From |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) (1988Ri09) and |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I11} for the 635|g in (p,4n|g) (1977De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Assigned to a 554.03 |g by 1976Gr20, previously placed from a 3071.7 level. If this present association is correct, then J{+|p}=2+ uniquely for the 1382.3 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|g peak is potentially a doublet, containing also the 755 |g from the 1526 level (2002Ca49). 
M$Previously, a 755.4 |g was assigned mult=E0+E2. However, the possibility of this peak being a doublet casts doubt on this mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|g peak is potentially a doublet, including also the 754.9 |g from the 1525 level (2002Ca49). 
M$Previously assigned as E1. See the comment on the mult of the 754.9 G. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Reported by 1976Gr20 for a 1178.0 |g, formerly placed from a 2006 level whose existence has not been confirmed. The evaluator has assumed that this is the same transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From level-energy difference. Assumed the same as the 1149.1 |g reported by 1976Gr20 from this level. 
RI$From 1976Gr20. 2002Ca49 report I|g<0.15. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(259|g)/I|g(684|g) from {+156}Ho |e decay and I|g(684). Previous value was I|g(259)|<3.8, which included a contribution from {+157}Dy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I|g=1.2 {I9} including contribution from {+155}Dy and {+157}Dy. From {+156}Ho |e decay, 2002Ca49 report I|g<0.43. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI If the (p,4n|g) reaction at 39 MeV does not populate the 3498 level, the data of 1976El13 yield I|g=3.0 for this placement and 3.7 for the |g from the 3498 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI From the I|g(520)/I|g(741) and I|g(520)/I|g(988) ratios in the different reactions, one can deduce I|g=0.4 for this placement and I|g(520)=2.9 for the |g from the 2712 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From the I|g(520)/I|g(741) and I|g(520)/I|g(988) ratios in the different reactions, one can deduce I|g=2.9 for this placement and I|g(520)=0.4 for the |g from the 1958 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI If the (p,4n|g) reaction at 39 MeV does not populate this level, the data of 1976El13 yield I|g(432)=3.0 from the 1958 level and 3.7 for the |g from this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Computed from level energies because a |g with this placement is not given in |g table (1977De28); a |g of 684.23 depopulates the 1088 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI In {+156}Dy Adopted |g radiations, I|g(348)/I|g(667)=0.73, so about 45% of this line may be from another |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance at this level. 2003KaZP report I|g=57 {I3}. (Note: no |e feeding of this level is expected.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Initial and final spins are listed as 20+ and 18+, respectively in Table II of 2015Ma15, which seem misprints 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=0 transition. 2017Ha03 in reference 16 cite an unpublished work for E1 assignment from DCO and linear polarization data. Note that DCO is also consistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole but this assignment is unlikely in view of the transitions in band #4 proposed in this work. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$likely to be E1, as M1 would imply highly unlikely M2 for 854|g from 3040 level, 879|g from 3515 level, and 340|g from 4060 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI Measured value is |< 1.1 (from {+157}Ho |e decay, 1984Af01). From I(|g+ce) and |a one deduces 0.07. From the latter I{-|g} one deduces B(E2)(W.u.)=335. 
TI Deduced by evaluator from ce data in {+157}Ho |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI Measured value is < 8; from I(|g+ce) and |a one deduces 0.03 |< I{-|g} |< 1.2. 
M The assignment and |d value are from {+157}Ho |e decay (1984Af01). However, the data they present are, in fact, compatable with any E2 content from 2.5% to 100%; therefore, |a can range from |? 80 to 1980. 
TI Deduced by evaluator from ce data of {+157}Ho |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E A |g of 210.5 with I{-|g}=58 is reported in Gd(|a,xn|g) from this level. Intensity is too large to be missed in {+157}Ho decay and multipolarity would need to be M2; so |g is misplaced or level is doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E in {+157}Ho |e decay (1984Af01), this |g is placed to the (3/2-) level at 401.20 keV {I7} and in Gd(|a,xn|g) (1973Kl03) a |g of this energy is tentatively placed to the (11/2-) level at 400.93 keV {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E0)
decay_comment:
CC In {+157}Ho |e decay, from 1977AnYX |a{-K}(exp)=0.59 {I16} compared to |a{-K}(M1)=0.060, but |a{-K}(exp) could be in error since 1972To05 indicate this ce line contains other contributions and 1984Af01 do not report a value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI Reported value is 100, but that value is inconsistent by a factor of 100 from other I{-|g} values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
TI$Deduced from intensity balance at 148 level; i.e., I(|g+ce)(51)=I(|g+ce)(87) + I(|g+ce)(148) - I(|g+ce)(14). The corresponding calculated I{-|g}(51)=0.071 {I17} and the measured value is <0.12 (1971KiZQ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp=2.18 (1972To02) 
$|a(K)exp=9.1 {I13}, |a(L{-1+2})exp=1.64 {I25}, |a(L{-3})exp=0.30 {I4} (1984Af01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L{-2})exp |> 19, |a(L{-3})exp |> 23, |a(M)exp |> 10 (1984Af01) 
RI Measured value is |< 2 (1984Af01). From I|g(1+|a)(26) and |a, one deduces 0.12. 
M The experimental L subshell ratios would allow a large M1 content, but the J|p require pure E2. 
TI Deduced by evaluator from ce data (1984Af01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI |g peak obscured by x-ray line. 
TI$From intensity of M{-2}+M{-3} ce line = 13 {I2} (1984Af01), I(|g+ce)=73. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L{-2})exp |> 2.3, |a(L{-3})exp |> 2.7, |a(M)exp |> 1.3 (1984Af01) 
RI Measured value is |< 3. From I(|g+ce) and |a=80-1980 one deduces 0.01 |< I{-|g} |< 0.44. 
M 1984Af01 give |d |? 0.23 and thus |a |? 127; however, the data presented are, in fact, compatable with any E2 content from 2.5% to 100%; therefore, |a can range from about 80 to 1980. 
TI Deduced by evaluator from ce data (1984Af01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L{-2})exp=2.2 {I9} (1984Af01) 
RI From table 2 of 1984Af01; table 1 of same article gives 13 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.12 (1972To02) 
$|a(K)exp=0.123~{I13} (1984Af01) 
RI The four references use different conventions on the uncertainty for this reference |g. The evaluator has arbitrarily assigned a 5% uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp|<0.15, whence M1 or E1 (1972To02; however 253|g placed by 1972To02 at 527 level was relocated by 1984Af01 at 401 level) 
$|a(K)exp=0.093~{I42} (1984Af01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.05 (1972To02) 
$|a(K)exp=0.044~{I13} (1984Af01) 
E This is placement of 1972To05; 1977AnYX suggest alternate placement from 897 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E0)
decay_comment:
M Assigned M1+E0 by 1977AnYX from |a{-K}(exp)=0.59 {I16} compared to |a{-K}(M1)=0.060, but 1972To05 report this ce line contains other contributions and do not report an |a{-K}(exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI From 1977AnYX. 1984Af01 do not report this |g line and 1972To05 report a complex line at 627 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.022 (1972To02, no multipolariry ADOPTED) 
E,RI 1977AnYX report intensity for |g at 626.6 keV, 1972To05 assert that their peak at 627.0 is a multiplet, and 1984Af01 give I{-|g} |< 5 for 627.0 line. 
M Assigned (M1+E0) by 1977AnYX, I{-|g} in question. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.12 {I4} 
$Pol=-0.07 {I2} 
$compilers note: negative value of Pol is not consistent with the assigned E1 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Values are discrepant, 218.20 {I1} from {+158}Ho |e decay (11.3 m + 28 m), 218.221 {I4} from {+158}Tb |b- decay, 218.32 {I2} from {+159}Tb(p,2n|g) reaction, and 218.35 {I6} from {+165}Ho(|p-,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Values are discrepant, 320.51 {I3} from {+158}Ho |e decay (11 m + 27 m), 320.62 {I4} from {+159}Tb(p,2n|g) reaction, and 320.47 {I7} from {+165}Ho(|p-,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI From one {+158}Ho |e decay reference and appears to be much too large by a factor of 100 since the corresponding B(E2)(W.u.)=3.4|*10{+5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+E0)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
CC Calculated from |a{-K}(exp)=0.014 {I4} (1978An11) and |a/|a{-K}(E2)=1.20. 
|r{+2}(E0) = 0.027 {I12} from 1999Wo07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E Only 846 |g placed from 6+ level in (p,2n|g) where it also has three other placements and only 1169 |g placed from 6+ level in {+158}Ho |e decay (11.3 m+28 m) where an 846 |g is placed from another level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Values are discrepant; 475.4 {I3} from (p,2n|g) reaction, 476.0 {I3} from (HI,xn|g), and 476.89 {I21} from (|p-,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From 2005Pi21 in ({+36}S,|a4n|g); a different 838|g was assigned at the (30-) level of this band by 2003Ha45 in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From 1978An11. Other: 290 {I60} (1974Al30) and 262 {I44} (1975Ru02). This difference is due to a different division of the total intensity for the 846.6 and 847.3 |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}(exp)=0.0048 {I10} indicates M1,E2 for the multiplet. E2 multipolarity required by decay scheme for this placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$(E1,E2) from 1978An11; E1 excluded by spin assignments 
RI From 1978An11. Other: |? 20 (1974Al30) and 23.1 {I20} (1975Ru02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From 1978An11. Other: 220 {I60} (1974Al30) and 256 {I44} (1975Ru02). This difference is due to a different division of the total intensity for the 846.6 and 847.3 |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}=0.0048 {I10} for doubly placed |g. E2 is required by J|p's for component from 990 level which suggests M1 for this component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$If this 3237 level is fed from the 9+ parent, it must have J |? 8, so placement of this 2920-keV |g to the 4+ level at 317 is doubtful. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E In 1966Gr04 this |g is placed from 5+ of |g band and from this level; in Adopted |g's, the |g from 5+ of |g band is 998 keV as given by 1970Je09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E Entry of 998.2 in table 4 of 1970Je09 is assumed to be a typo since the level-energy difference of 1970Je09 is 986. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.162~{I18}, A{-4}=-0.073~{I26} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.12~{I3}, A{-4}=-0.01~{I3} (1972Jo02) 
RI$34 (1972Jo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.291~{I7}, A{-4}=-0.075~{I10} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.28~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.07~{I2} (1972Jo02) 
RI$112 (1972Jo02); 101~{I6} (1978Zo02); 606~{I21} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.162~{I18}, A{-4}=-0.073~{I26} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.31~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.10~{I3} (1972Jo02) 
RI$100 (1972Jo02); 100 (1978Zo02); 474~{I19} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.306~{I8}, A{-4}=-0.073~{I12} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.33~{I2}, A{-4}=-0.11~{I2} (1972Jo02) 
RI$78 (1972Jo02); 94~{I6} (1978Zo02); 291~{I18} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.310~{I9}, A{-4}=-0.073~{I13} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.39~{I6}, A{-4}=-0.10~{I6} (1972Jo02) 
RI$54 (1972Jo02); 42.0~{I14} (1972Fe08,(|a,4n)), 44~{I2} (1972Fe08,(|a,3n)); 91~{I7} (1978Zo02); 152~{I15} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.322~{I12}, A{-4}=-0.066~{I18} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.40~{I10}, A{-4}=-0.24~{I13} (1972Jo02) 
RI$29 (1972Jo02); 17.0~{I13} (1972Fe08,(|a,4n)), 30~{I2} (1972Fe08,(|a,3n)); 80~{I6} (1978Zo02); 77~{I11} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.292~{I16}, A{-4}=-0.117~{I25} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.32~{I4}, A{-4}=-0.14~{I4} (1972Jo02) 
RI$19 (1972Jo02); 10.0~{I13} (1972Fe08,(|a,4n)), 19.0~{I17} (1972Fe08,(|a,3n)); 68~{I6} (1978Zo02); 48~{I8} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.349~{I24}, A{-4}=-0.166~{I36} (1972Th02) 
$A{-2}=0.34~{I4}, A{-4}=-0.12~{I4} (1972Jo02) 
RI$11 (1972Jo02); 7.0~{I12} (1972Fe08,(|a,4n)), 8.5~{I20} (1972Fe08,(|a,3n)); 42~{I7} (1978Zo02); 38~{I8} (1994Gu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$2011Pr06 associate in fig. 1 only the 99.5|g of {+159}Dy with a peak that also fits the 98.9|g of {+158}Dy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEM$value contains a contribution from another ce line (1968Bo18). 
RI$weighted average of: 6.7 {I7}, from intensity balance at the 57 level; 4.2 {I7}, from ce(L) and |eL for the 57-keV transition; and 9.0 {I33}, from measured I(K| x ray) after subtraction of the contribution from the other |g transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1968Bo18; other: 173~{I1} (1967Co20). 
RI$Calculated from I|g(178)/I|g(120) from {+159}Ho |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated from I|g(179)/I|g(99) from {+159}Ho |e decay. Other: 10.0 {I15} from I|g(177.6+179.0)=12.5 {I13} minus I|g(177.6)=2.5 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
TI$Value listed by author (1982Vy02), but no supporting I|g or ce data given. Placement shown in table of |g data, but not in decay-scheme table. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From the decay-scheme table (table 5) of 1982Vy02, but given as 838.635~{I18} in the table of |g radiation (table 2) of the same reference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty increased from 0.04~keV, due to inconsistency with energy of 1016 |g from this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty reported as 0.021~keV, but energy differs by 0.10~keV from level energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty reported as 0.020~keV, but energy differs by 0.12~keV from level-energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty reported as 0.06~keV, but energy differs by 0.68~keV from level energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty reported as 0.07~keV, but energy differs by 0.32~keV from level energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Given as E2 in the table of |g radiation (table 2), but not listed in the decay-scheme table (table 5). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From the decay-scheme table (table 5) of 1982Vy02, but given as 1193.06 {I3} in the table of |g radiations (table 2) in this reference. 
M$Given as E2 in the decay-scheme table (table 5) of 1982Vy02, but no mult entry given in the table of |g radiations (table 2) of this reference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 2003Ju02. From the |g-branching data of 2002Su03, I|g=1.7 {I6} is computed, but this disagrees with the data from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$From 2003Ju02. |g not reported by 2002Su03. 
RI$Computed from the |g-branching data of 2003Ju02, adjusted to the intensity scale of 2002Su03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$From 2003Ju02. From the |g-branching data of 2002Su03, I|g=4.6 {I5} is computed. 
M$R(ADO)=0.40 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$From 2003Ju02. From the |g-branching data of 2002Su03, I|g=2.0 {I4} is computed. 
M$R(ADO)=0.5 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 2003Ju02. 2002Su03 do not report this |g. 
RI$Value from 2003Ju02. It is based on their intensity scale, which differs from that of 2002Su03, the one used here, and thus is not directly comparable to the other listed I|g values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$From 2003Ju02. Computed from the level-energy difference. The authors report E|g=303.2, but this leads to a poor energy fit. 2002Su03 do not report this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,M$ K-shell conversion electrons observed by 2009Ad04 (|e decay), with no observed |g ray that could produce the K-shell conversion electrons 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.875 
$X(E0/E2) > 0.3 (2009Ad04, |e decay); the E2 transition is 1193.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$from K-shell electron peak corroborated with no intensities at the corresponding E|g (2010BoZZ, |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.004 {I17} for this transition. From RUL, one expects |d(M3/E2)<0.001. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39, {+160}Tb |b{+-} decay, |d=-0.95 {I+8-11}. These authors state that this value may be wrong, since the transition is very weak and is probably affected by the near-lying strong 879 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.0188 {I24} for this transition. This leads to B(M2)(W.u.)|>6.6, which exceeds RUL of 1. From {+160}Ho |e decay, 1998Kr21 report |d(M2/E1)=-0.04 {I+30-24}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$X(E0/E2): 0.27 {I10} (2005Ki02 evaluation), 0.3 (2009Ad04, |e decay); q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2): 2.2 {I8} (2005Ki02 evaluation), 2.1 {I6} (2009Ad04, |e decay); the E2 transition is 1193.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.2|*10{+4} {I+19-18} exceeds recommended upper limit of 1000 
RI from I|g(69.8|g)/I|g(1066|g) in {+160}Ho |e decay and I|g(1066|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=0.017 {I6} 
CC$calculated by evaluator in |e decay dataset 
RI from Coul. ex. 
MR from Coul. ex. Listed value is |d(E2/M1). From {+160}Ho |e decay, 1994SlZZ report |d(E2/M1)=-1.0 +|@-4. 
$X(E0/E2)=0.29 {I6} (2008VaZU, |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$presumably conversion electrons from this transition were observed by 2008VaZU (|e decay) who also reports X(E0/E2) < 0.0022 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(207.9|g)/I|g(1013|g) in (|a,2n|g) and I|g(1013|g). |g not reported in {+160}Ho |e decay. 
M from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from Coul. ex. |g not reported in {+160}Ho |e decay. 
RI value relative to I|g=100 for the 486 |g. This scale is different from that of the two highest-energy |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
$X(E0/E2)=0.6 (2009Ad04, |e decay); q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=2.8 {I9} (2009Ad04, |e decay); the E2 transition is 1621.4|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2): 6.3 {I24} (for I(ce(K)) mean value of 0.002 (2009Ad04) and 0.0043 (2006Bo37)); the E2 transition is 1865.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$X(E0/E2): 0.6 {I3} (2005Ki02 evaluation), 0.9 (2009Ad04, |e decay); q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2): 2.1 {I8} (2005Ki02 evaluation), 3.0 {I13} (2009Ad04, |e decay); the E2 transition is 1865.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI from the in-beam study of 2002Ju08. From {+160}Ho |e decay, I|g(1055|g)/I|g(404|g)=0.2 
M,MR from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from 1987Ri08, (|a,2n|g). See the comments on the 181 |g for the proposed |g deexcitation of the even-spin members of the K|p=2- to the |g-vibrational band. 
RI computed from I(|g+ce)(220|g)/I(|g+ce)(360.0|g) from (|a,2n|g) and I|g(359.8|g). Note that if there is a significant M2 admixture in this |g, |a will be somewhat larger and the deduced I|g will be smaller. 
CC computed assuming mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI the listed value is the undivided intensity from the in-beam studies. It is not possible at present to provide an accurate split of this intensity between the two proposed placements (see the comment on the 486 |g in the "in-beam" data set.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from 1987Ri08, (|a,2n|g). These authors report a sequence of |g's from the even-spin members of the K|p=2- band to |DJ=-1 members of the |g-vibrational band. 2002Ju08 ({+7}Li,p4n|g) do not mention such a category of transitions in their level-scheme table (Table 1). I|g computed from I(|g+ce)(181|g)/I(|g+ce)(424.5|g) from (|a,2n|g) and I|g(424.4|g). Note that if there is a significant M2 admixture in this |g, |a will be somewhat larger and the deduced I|g will be smaller. 
CC computed assuming mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference. 2002Ad34, |e decay, report a strong 2734.72 |g but place all of it from a 2734.7 level. This |g might obscure a |g of the expected intensity from this 2822 level or a small portion of it may in fact correspond to the 2822|)86 transition. 
RI from (|g,|g'). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$(D+Q), |d<30 from (|a,2n|g). The proposed placement in the level scheme required mult=E2, which is inconsistent with the reported |d value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
identified by 1987Ri08 as connecting levels at 3454 and 3113. (This latter level has been revised to 3111.5 in this evaluation.) The placement of this |g and, hence, the existence of the 3452 level are uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 44.6 {I13} (1984Ch34), 43.3 {I3} (1986Me07) and 44.5 {I5} (1992Si23) (1983Ji01 do not quote an I|g value for this |g). 1992Si23 quote |DI|g=0.15, but this appears unreasonably small as well as inconsistent with related values given elsewhere in their paper. The evaluator has assigned an uncertainty of 1% to the I|g value of these authors in carrying out the weighted average. Others: 45 {I7} (1968Lu10), 43.2 {I23} (1970Ke07), 43.3 {I23} (1972Mc10), 38.8 {I5} (1974La15), 46.3 {I7} (1979Hn02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI 1984Ch34 report I|g=19.23 {I37}. This value is quite different from the other three values and has not been included in the average. 
MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.024 {I8} for this transition. This leads to B(M3)(W.u.) of the order of 3|*10{+7}, which is much larger than the upper limit of 10 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E the 581.1 level, known to decay via a single branch with E|g=297.24 {I8}, is populated in |b{+-} decay. The 297 |g, although obscured in the |g-ray spectrum from {+160}Tb decay, must thus be present. The listed value is from the level-energy difference. 
RI from intensity balance at the 581.1 level. 
M from adopted values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -16.7 {I+13-16} (1982Kr04), -12.8 {I15} (1979Gr22), -18 {I+4-8} (1974Fo27), -14.5 {I15} (1976Bh06), -16.3 {I13} (1973Ga10), -13.5 {I17} (1972Zu03), -11.5 {I19} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -8.3 {I+7-9} (1982Kr04), -9.0 {I+24-50} (1979Gr22), -7.7 {I+6-7} (1974Fo27), -7 {I+5-20} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -11.0 {I12} (1982Kr04), -37 {I+17-109} (from 1979Gr22, as recomputed by 1989Ma39), -8.4 {I+17-27} (1976Bh06), -18 {I5} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from {+160}Ho |e decay (25.6 min+5.02 h). 1989Ma39 report |d=-0.95 {I+8-11}, but state that this value may be incorrect because the |g is very weak and probably affected by the close-lying strong 879 |g. Other: -0.70 {I30} (1979Gr22), but 1998Kr07 point out that the second value of |d deduced from the data of 1979Gr22 is +5.0 {I+24-13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.02 {I4}. 1994SlZZ, from |g(|q) on oriented {+160}Ho nuclei, report |d(M3/E2)=-0.079 {I21}. However, from RUL, using reasonable estimates of B(E2) of the 1069 |g, the evaluator concludes that |d(M3/E2) is probably less than 0.0013. See the discussion on the 1069 |g in the {+160}Ho |e Decay (25.6 m+5.02 h) data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.0046 {I53}. Others: -0.010 {I9} (1982Kr04), +0.016 {I8} (1979Gr22), -0.003 {I6} (1974Fo27), -0.22 {I2} (1984Si16), -0.18 {I10} (1971Kr02), -0.20 {I5} (1967Ja04). From RUL, however, one expects |d<0.0021. This transition is assumed here to be pure E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.0188 {I24} for this |g. This implies B(M2)(W.u.)|>6.6, which exceeds the RUL limit of 1. Other |d values: -0.024 {I14} (1982Kr04), +0.023 {I18} (1979Gr22), -0.011 {I29} (1974Fo27), +0.22 {I6} (1984Si16), -0.048 {I24} (1976Bh06), -0.021 {I7} (1973Ga10), +0.005 {I10} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.062 {I4} (1982Kr04), -0.015 {I8} (1979Gr22), -0.031 {I12} (1974Fo27), +0.09 {I2} (1984Si16), +0.047 {I21} (1973Ga10), +0.02 {I2} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.009 {I15} (1982Kr04), +0.094 {I21} (1979Gr22), -0.004 {I17} (1974Fo27), -0.11 {I+10-11} (1984Si16), +0.005 {I4} (1996Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: +0.026 {I5} (1982Kr04), -0.050 {I11} (1979Gr22), -0.017 {I8} (1974Fo27), -0.05 {I6} (1984Si16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.016 {I16} (1982Kr04), -0.018 {I17} (1979Gr22), -0.043 {I15} (1974Fo27), -0.07 (1984Si16), +0.005 {I70} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.029 {I5} (1982Kr04), +0.026 {I9} (1979Gr22), -0.003 {I12} (1974Fo27), +0.05 {I+3-2} (1984Si16), -0.003 {I26} (1973Ga10), -0.03 {I3} (1971Kr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.006 {I33} (1982Kr04), +0.034 {I27} (1979Gr22), +0.039 {I32} (1974Fo27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI average of three values. 1992Si23 do not report an I|g value for this |g. 
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.085 {I40} (1982Kr04), -0.013 {I46} (1979Gr22), -0.156 {I25} (1974Fo27), +0.05 {I+14-17} (1984Si16), -0.020 {I22} (1996Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI average of 0.0193 {I14} (1986Me07) and 0.0160 {I19} (1992Si23) only. Values of 0.0051 {I19} (1983Ji01) and 0.030 {I3} (1984Ch34) not included in this average. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.013 {I8} (1982Kr04), +0.011 {I14} (1979Gr22), 0.000 {I12} (1974Fo27), -0.002 {I+60-58} (1984Si16), +0.010 {I4} (1996Al02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI the four I|g values included in the average form two distinct groupings, namely 9.35 {I4} (1983Ji01), 9.44 {I4} (1986Me07) and 9.87 {I20} (1984Ch34), 9.86 {I5} (1992Si23). 
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: +0.013 {I6} (1982Kr04), -0.045 {I11} (1979Gr22), -0.017 {I8} (1974Fo27), +0.19 {I+7-5} (1984Si16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=0.300 {I8} (1992Si23) excluded from the average 
MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.118 {I85} (1982Kr04), +0.02 {I+19-12} (1979Gr22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR 1998Kr21 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.05 {I+13-14}. However, from RUL<10 for an M3 transition, one expects that |d(M3/E2)<1.4|*10{+-5}. 
$I(ce(K))=14.0 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,M$ K-shell conversion electrons observed by 2009Ad04, with no observed |g ray that could produce the K-shell conversion electrons. Previously 2008VaZU argued that they found (by |g|g coin) a 682 keV doublet with the more intense component the already known 682.3 |g of relative I|g=21.0 {I10} (in 2008VaZU units), |a(K)exp=0.0065 {I7}, and |a(K)(E2){-theor}=0.00581, placed at 966.2, 2+ level; and the weaker 681.5 {I5} keV |g of relative I|g=2.0 {I5} that they placed at 2096.9, 4+ level, that would exclude the E0 assignment of 2009Ad04. The explicit non-observance of such weak component by 2009Ad04, as well as their theoretical calculations (by interacting vector boson model) showing possible E0 transition close to this energy, seem to justify the E0 assignment adopted here. However considering the pros and cons from 2008VaZU and 2009Ad04 we consider this |g ray and its placement as tentative. 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.875 
$I(ce(K))=0.0024 (2009Ad04) 
$B(E0)/B(E2)>0.3 (2009Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I(ce(K))=0.036 {I5} 
RI I|g=16.5 {I4} for the composite peak. 
MR 1998Kr21 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.04 {I5}. From low-temperature nuclear orientation, 1994SlZZ report |d(M3/E2)=-0.079 {I21}. The implied B(M3) is much larger than that consistent with RUL. Note this |g connects a member of the |g vibration with a member of the g.s. band. Such transitions typically have B(E2) values of the order of a few Weisskopf units. Choosing a reasonable value of 1.0 b(E2)(W.u.) for the B(E2) value of the 1069 |g, the evaluator finds that RUL implies |d(M3/E2)<0.0013. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.876 
$I(ce(K))=0.0053 {I10} (2002Ad34) 
$B(E0)/B(E2)=0.3 (2009Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$I(ce(K))=0.032 {I4} 
RI I|g=11.5 {I3} for the composite peak. 
MR 1994SlZZ report |d=+7.1 {I+8-10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
CC$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and I|g, calculated |a(K) and |a (for M1+E2), and electronic factors |W{-K}(E0) and |W(E0), respectively 
$I(ce(K))=0.015 {I3} 
RI I|g=1.77 {I7} for the composite peak. 
MR 1994SlZZ report |d(E2/M1)=-1.0 +|@-4. 
$according to 2008VaZU 90% contribution in conversion gives E0 component, from which they deduced parameter B(E0)/B(E2)=0.29 {I6} and |r{+2}=0.028 {I7} (the evaluator could not check these values) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=1.99 {I4} for the composite peak. 
MR 1998Kr21 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.15 {I+18-16} 
$I(ce(K))=0.028 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=15.5 {I5} for the composite peak. 
MR 1998Kr21 report |d(M2/E1)=-0.07 {I+15-14} 
$I(ce(K))=0.012 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$presumably conversion electrons from this transition were observed by 2008VaZU who also report B(E0)/B(E2) < 0.0022 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI I|g=1.10 {I3} for the composite peak. 
M 2002Ad34 report mult=E1,E2. Placement requires E1. 
$I(ce(K))=0.0012 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR 1998Kr21 report |d(M3/E2)=-0.002 {I30}. 1994SlZZ report |d(M3/E2)=0.023 {I+7-4}. However, this latter value implies a B(M3) value |?120 times larger than that allowed by RUL. 
$I(ce(K))=1.04 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E,M$ from 2009Ad04 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.877 
$I(ce(K))=0.0033 (2009Ad04) 
$B(E0)/B(E2)=0.6 (2009Ad04) 
$presumably conversion electrons from this transition were observed by 2008VaZU who also reports B(E0)/B(E2)=1.3 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E level-energy difference=234.58. E|g=234.81 for doublet 
RI I|g=0.18 {I2} for the composite peak. 
M 2002Ad34 quote E2,M1, but placement requires E2. 
$I(ce(K))=0.018 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 1994SlZZ. 1998Kr21 report -1.4|<|d|<-0.4 for J=1 and |d=+3.6 {I+71-16} for J=2. 
$I(ce(K))=0.0036 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2009Ad04 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.873 
$I(ce(K))=0.0024 (2009Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2009Ad04 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.874 
$I(ce(K))=0.0039 (2009Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2009Ad04 
$I(ce(K))=0.002 (2009Ad04); I(ce(K))=0.0043 (2006Bo37) 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K))= 0.0032 (mean value of the measured values) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.875 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2009Ad04 
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.876 
$I(ce(K))=0.0024 (2009Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and ratio of electronic factors |W{-K}(E0)|W(E0)=0.877 
$I(ce(K))=0.0015 {I2} (2002Ad34) 
$B(E0)/B(E2)=0.9 (2009Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI I|g=0.78 {I3} for the composite peak. 
M 2002Ad34 report mult=E1,E2. Placement requires E1. 
$I(ce(K))=0.0009 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$calculated by evaluator based on measured I(ce(K)) and I|g, calculated |a(K) and |a (assuming |d=1 for E2+M1), and electronic factors |W{-K}(E0) and |W(E0), respectively 
$I(ce(K))=0.00036 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=1272.02. E|g=1271.89 for doublet 
RI I|g=15.5 {I5} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=1262.55. E|g=1262.83 for doublet 
RI I|g=1.77 {I7} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=1.25 {I3} for the composite peak. 
$I(ce(K))=0.0006 {I2} 
M 2002Ad34 report mult=E1,(E2). Placement requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I(ce(K))=0.00022 {I7}. A{-2}=+0.25 {I18} 
1998Kr21 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.07 {I13}, but for a different placement, namely from 2858, 3- to 284, 4+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E in their Table 1, 2002Ad34 place this |g from the 2896 level, but in their Table 2 they also place it from this level. The evaluator has shown it deexciting both levels with the intensity undivided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1345.53. E|g=1345.08 for doublet. |g not used in least-squares fitting procedure 
RI I|g=1.59 {I8} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+2.1 {I+46-10} (1998Kr21), but for a different placement: from 1703, 4+ to 284, 4+ 
$I(ce(K))=0.0025 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=447.77. E|g=448.05 for doublet 
RI I|g=0.17 {I3} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=0.15 {I7} for the composite peak. 
M 2002Ad34 report mult=E1,E2. Placement requires E1. 
$I(ce(K))<0.00019 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E this is the placement given by 2002Ad34 in their Table 1, but in their Table 2 they also place it from the 2665.8 level. The evaluator has shown it deexciting both levels with the intensity undivided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$|d 1987Ri08 list |d=-0.05 {I5}. Assuming a misprint in table 1 of their paper, one infers a second possibility for |d, namely |d>7. 
MR$from |a(K)exp (by evalutor): 1.9 {I+17-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR 1987Ri08 report |d<1 or |d>-8. The evaluator has assumed that these should be |d<1 (in absolute value) and |d<-8, respectively. 
MR$from |a(K)exp (by evaluator): 2.2 {I+15-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR 1987Ri08 report |d<8 and |d>-14. The evaluator has assumed that this latter value should be |d<-14. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$M1 mixing ratio from |a(K)exp (by evaluator): 1.4 {I7}; however this is pure E2 based on |DJ(levels)=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR 1987Ri08 report |d<-2.7 and |d>1.2. The evaluator has assumed that this latter means |d>+1.2. 
MR$from |a(K)exp (by evaluator): 0.0 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E assigned by 1987Ri08 as the transition to the 10+ member of the |g band. However, the energy fit implied by this placement is poor. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M,MR the proposed placement in the level scheme requires mult=E2, which is inconsistent with the reported |d value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
identified as connecting levels at 3454 and 3113. (This latter level energy has been revised here to 3111.6). The placement of this |g and, hence, the existence of the 3452.2 level are uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E from 1991Zi01. 
RI weighted average of 179 {I21} (2002Ad34, |e decay) and 144 {I30} (1991Zi01, B(E1) ratio). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$ce(L1)/ce(L2)=1.39 {I2}; ce(L1)/ce(L3)=1.00 {I2} 
E$from the evaluation by 2000He14 ({+161}Tb |b{+-} decay). 
MR$from {+161}Tb |b- decay:| |d| <0.032 (1971St38); | |d| < 0.010 (1966Gi02) 
L1/L2,L1/L3$L subshell ratios from 1961Gr01 as quoted by 1974Tu05. 
From Compton polarimetry in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay, 1999Ts02 measure -(3.8 {I8})|*10{+-3} for the parity-odd circular polarization of this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M from 1984Vy01, {+161}Ho |e decay. 
TI computed from data from {+161}Ho |e decay. 
RI from I(|g+ce)(18) and |a, I|g=34. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR computed by the evaluator using the following data: |d{+2}=0.046 {I4}, from {+161}Ho |e decay (1984Vy01); |d{+2}=0.048 {I19}, from {+161}Ho |e decay (1965Ab04); and %E2=4.7 {I9}, from {+160}Dy(n,|g) (1986Sc16). Other: 1961Gr01 report %E2=4, from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from the evaluation by 2000He14 ({+161}Tb |b{+-} decay). 
M penetration parameter |l=+2.5 {I23} (1982Bh07,1985Bh08). These authors derived |d{+2}=0.0036 {I2} in their analysis. 
MR adopted by the evaluator from %E2=0.310 {I5}, from L- and M-subshell data in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1966Gi02). The uncertainty given by these authors was doubled by the evaluator in computing the uncertainty in this |d value. The sign is from |g(|q) (1983Ri15). Others: %E2=0.4 {I2} (1958Ha13), |?0.4 (1961Gr01), |d{+2}=0.0036 {I2} (1982Bh07,1985Bh08), and |d=-0.067 {I42}, all from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay; %E2=0.30 {I15} (1984Vy01), from {+161}Ho |e decay; and %E2=0.50 {I24} (1986Sc16), from {+160}Dy(n,|g). Also, %E2=5.0 {I2} (1971Be24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E from the evaluation by 2000He14 ({+161}Tb |b{+-} decay). 
MR 0.00 {I3}, computed by the evaluator from -0.006 {I20} (1983Ri15), 0.06 {I+3-6} (1966Su03), and +0.08 {I10} (1971Kr19), all from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from 1984Vy01, {+161}Ho |e decay. 
MR computed by the evaluator from the L-subshell ratios reported by 1984Vy01, {+161}Ho |e decay. These authors report %E2=4.5 {I+25-12}, which implies a |d value somewhat different from that chosen here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M from 1984Vy01, 161HO EC DECAY. 
MR from |g(|q) in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay, 1983Ri15 give |d=-0.1 {I+5-3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR computed from the weighted average of the following |d{+2} values, both from the {+161}Ho |e decay: 1.106 {I21} (1984Vy01); and 1.094 {I36} (1987BaZB). The sign is from |g(|q) from the {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other related data: from Tb |b{+-} decay, %E2=47 (1961Gr01) and |d=-1.1 {I+3-16} (1983Ri15); from {+161}Ho |e decay: |d{+2}=1.1 {I7} (1965Ab04). 
From Compton polarimetry in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay, 1999Ts02 measure -(7.0 {I15})|*10{+-5} for the parity-odd circular polarization of this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI from {+161}Tb decay; the value from (n,|g) is 0.06 {I6}. 
M from |a data from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1961Gr01) and {+161}Ho |e decay (1984Vy01). 
MR computed by the evaluator from the L-subshell ratios reported by 1984Vy01 from {+161}Ho |e decay. These authors report %E2=0.25 {I+15-11}, which implies a |d value somewhat different from that chosen here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from the evaluation by 1999He10 ({+161}Tb |b{+-} decay). 
M penetration parameter |l=-5 {I5} (1965Su04, 1966Su03, and 1983Hn01) from |l=-7 {I+6-8} (1965Su04,1966Su03) and |l=-4.0 {I42} (1983Hn01). Values of |d=-0.22 and |d=-0.20, respectively, were used in these authors' analyses. 
MR computed by the evaluator from a weighted average of |d{+2} values deduced from the following: |d{+2}=0.038 {I11}, from {+161}Ho |e decay (1984Vy01); |d{+2}=0.048 {I06}, from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1965Su04); and %E2=2.8 {I4}, from {+160}Dy(n,|g) (1986Sc16). The sign is from |g|g(|q) (1965Su04) and |g(|q) (1983Ri15), both from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI from {+161}Tb decay; other values are 12.4 {I29}, from {+160}Dy(n,|g), and 22 {I11}, from {+161}Ho |e decay. 
M from {+161}Ho decay (1984Vy01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1961Gr01). From {+161}Ho |e decay, 1984Vy01 give mult=(M1). 
MR from |g(|q) in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1983Ri15). 1961Gr01 quote %E2|?40, from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 1984Vy01, {+161}Ho |e decay. From {+160}Dy(n,|g), 1986Sc16 report %E2=11 {I4}, which yields a significantly different |d value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M mult=(M1) from 1984Vy01, {+161}Ho |e decay. |d value of 1988Os01 (Coulomb excitation) implies a mixture. M2 possibility eliminated by RUL. 
MR from 1988Os01 (Coul. ex.). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M FROM 1984Vy01, 161HO EC DECAY. 
MR from {+161}Ho |e decay, 1981GrZV list |d=1.04, but 1984Vy01 (presumed by the evaluator to supersede this work) do not show this value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from {+161}Ho |e decay. In {+160}Gd(|a,3n|g), I|g(217)/I|g(119)=6.8, compared to the value of 0.12 given here. 
M 1984Vy01, in {+161}Ho |e decay, list M1,E2. J|p assignments require E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from {+160}Dy(n,|g),(1986Sc16). 
MR -0.073 {I84}, from |g(|q) in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1983Ri15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR reported values: %E2=43 {I19}, from {+160}Dy(n,|g) (1986Sc16); |d=-0.040 {I35} or -3.8 {I+4-7}, from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay (1983Ri15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI from {+160}Gd(|a,3n|g). From Coul. ex., I|g=25.8 {I14}. 
M from 1972Hj01, {+160}Gd(|a,3n|g), mult=D. M1,E2 implied by level scheme. The |d value of 1988Os01 requires an admixture. 
MR from 1988Os01, Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D from 1972Hj01, {+160}Gd(|a,3n|g), and M1,E2 from level scheme. M1+E2 implied by the |d value. 
MR from 1988Os01, Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D from 1972Hj01, {+160}Gd(|a,3n|g). D+Q required by |d value. M2 eliminated by RUL. 
MR from 1988Os01, Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M the A{-2} value from 1972Hj01, {+160}Gd(|a,3n|g), suggests a stretched E2, but the placement requires |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR from their measured x/|g ratio, 1971St38 report | |d|<0.032. From L-subshell ratios, 1966Gi02 give | |d|<0.010. The evaluator feels that this limit is too optimistic. 
L1/L2,L1/L3$subshell ratios are from 1961Gr01, as quoted in 1974Tu05. 
From Compton polarimetry, 1999Ts02 report the value -(3.8 {I8})|*10{+-3} for the parity-odd circular polarization of this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from L-subshell ratios in {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay, 1961Gr01 report %E2=4, with no uncertainty given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M deduced penetration parameter is |l=+2.5 {I23} (1982Bh07,1985Bh08). These authors derived |d{+2}=0.0036 {I2} in their analysis. 
MR 1966Gi02 report %E2=0.310 {I5}, from L- and M-subshell ratios. In computing the listed |d value, the evaluator has doubled the quoted uncertainty. The sign is from 1983Ri15, |g(|q), who report |d=-0.067 {I42}. Other: |d=-0.01 {I6}, from |g(|q) (1971Kr19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR |d=0.00 {I3}. An average of: -0.006 {I20}, from |g(|q) (1983Ri15); 0.06 {I+3-6}, from |g|g(|q) (1966Su03); and +0.08 {I10}, from |g(|q) (1971Kr19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR 1961Gr01 report %E2=47, from L-subshell ratios. From |g(|q), 1983Ri15 report |d=-1.1 {I+3-16}. 
From Compton polarimetry, 1999Ts02 report the value -(7.0 {I15})|*10{+-5} for the parity-odd circular polarization of this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from the evaluation by 1999He10. 
M deduced penetration parameter is |l=-5 {I5} from |l=-7 {I+6-8} (1965Su04,1966Su03) and |l=-4.0 {I42} (1983Hn01). Values of |d=-0.22 and |d=-0.20, respectively, were used in these authors' analyses. 
MR 1961Gr01 report %E2=3, from L-subshell ratios. 1965Su04 report |d=-0.22 {I2}, from |g|g(|q). 1983Ri15, from |g(|q), give |d=-0.14 {I10}. 1983Hn01 report %E2=3.8 {I4}, deduced from x/|g ratios and a particular choice of L1/L2 and Li/L3 ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR reported values disagree. From |g(|q), 1983Ri15 report |d=-0.040 {I35} or -3.8 {I+4-7} (1983Ri15). From {+160}Dy(n,|g), 1986Sc16 report %E2=43 {I19}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M deduced penetration parameter is |l=+2.5 {I23} (1982Bh07,1985Bh08). These authors derive |d{+2}=0.0036 {I2} in their analysis. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR |d=0.00 {I3}; average of -0.006 {I20} (1983Ri15), 0.06 {I+3-6} (1966Su03), and +0.08 {I10} (1971Kr19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI measured value is |<0.7 (1984Vy01). The value computed from I(ce) is 0.28 {I6} 
MR computed by the evaluator from the L-subshell ratios of 1984Vy01. The listed |d value implies a %E2 value somewhat different from that reported by these authors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
L1/L2,L1/L3,L2/L3 $subshell ratios are from 1984Vy01. 
MR from the L-subshell ratio data of 1984Vy01, the evaluator calculates |d{+2}=1.106 {I21}, in agreement with their reported %E2=53.7 {I43}. From the L-subshell ratios of 1987BaZB, the evaluator calculates |d{+2}=1.094 {I36}, giving essentially the same %E2 value as that given by them. From the L-subshell ratios of 1965Ab04, the evaluator calculates |d{+2}=1.1 {I7}. 1986GrZQ report %E2=48.0 {I13}, but do not show the data from which this value was derived. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI measured value is |<2 (1984Vy01). The value computed from I(ce) is 0.31 {I5}. 
MR this value is somewhat different from the value derived from %E2=0.25 {I+15-11}, which is that reported by 1984Vy01 from L-subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M deduced penetration parameter is |l=-5 {I5} (1965Su04, 1966Su03, and 1983Hn01) from |l=-7 {I+6-8} (1965Su04,1966Su03) and |l=-4.0 {I42} (1983Hn01). Values of |d=-0.22 and |d=-0.20, respectively, were used in these authors' analyses. 
MR from L-subshell ratios, 1984Vy01 report %E2=3.2 {I13}. This is somewhat different from that implied by |d{+2}=0.038 {I11}, computed by the evaluator from their reported L-subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR computed by the evaluator from L1/L2=0.67 {I20}, as reported by 1984Vy01. 1965Ab04 report L1/L2=0.65, which leads to |d=0.96. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E the energy fit of this |g is poor and it is not reported in (n,|g). So, we show it as questionable here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=7.5 {I25} 
MR 1986Sc16 report %E2=11 {I4} for this |g, which yields a |d value considerably different from the adopted one. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0156 {I20} 
MR 1986Sc16 report %E2=43 {I19}, but 1983Ri15 report |d=-0.040 {I35} or -3.8 {I+4-7}, from {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI RI(140)/RI(83)=35/100 from 1966Bo16, but this may be based on total intensity of 83 G, which is a doublet (1968Ha05, 1988Os01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$2021Ju03 quote value from ENSDF (2011Re14). Compilers obtain relative I|g=22.85 {I56}, and absolute %I|g=24.53 {I24} from intensity balance (I|g(ce+g,in)=75.1 {I17}) and by assuming no direct |b{+-} feeding to this level, which is consistent with 1964Fu11 and similarity with {+163}Tb |b{+-} decay (2010Re03) where the same |n5/2[523]->|p3/2[411] transition is involved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$no intensity given by 2021Ju03. Compilers deduced I(|g+ce)=0.17 {I5}, relative I|g=0.025 {I7} and absolute %I|g=0.027 {I8}, determined from |SI(|g+ce)[to 7/2+]=0.818 {I16}, and by assuming no direct |b{+-} feeding to this level [|DJ=2 |b{+-} transition, which is also |DN=2, |Dn{-z}=3 forbidden (|n5/2[642]->|p3/2[411])] and I(|g+ce)(18.15|g)=230 {I80} and I|g(43.821|g)=100 from the adopted levels in ENSDF (2011Re14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$2021Ju03 quote value from ENSDF (2011Re14), however, misprinted as 6.02 {I63}. Compilers obtain relative I|g=0.075 {I6} and absolute %I|g=0.081 {I7} from I(|g+ce)=0.65 {I5}, determined from |SI(|g+ce)[to 7/2+]=0.818 {I16}, and by assuming no direct |b{+-} feeding to this level [|DJ=2 |b{+-} transition which is also is |DN=2, |Dn{-z}=3 forbidden (|n5/2[642]->|p3/2[411])] and I(|g+ce)(18.15|g)=230 {I80} and I|g(43.821|g)=100 from the adopted levels in ENSDF (2011Re14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$no intensity is given by 2021Ju03. Compilers obtain relative I|g=0.0062 {I9} and absolute %I|g=0.0067 {I10}, using I|g(56.64|g)/I|g(100.413|g)=100/29 {I4} from the adopted levels in ENSDF (2011Re14) and I|g(100.413|g) from 2021Ju03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Compilers obtain absolute %I|g=0.215 {I6} 
E$differs by 4|s from the value obtained from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Compilers obtain absolute %I|g=0.0493 {I13} 
E$differs by 3|s from the value obtained from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$2021Ju03 quote value from ENSDF (2011Re14). Compilers obtain relative I|g=0.041 {I5} and absolute %I|g=0.044 {I6} using I|g(28.701|g)/I|g(57.1917|g)=2.0 {I1}/100 {I12} from the adopted levels in ENSDF (2011Re14) and I|g(57.1917|g) from 2021Ju03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$Compilers obtain absolute %I|g=0.214 {I6} 
E$differs by 3|s from the value obtained from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$2021Ju03 quote value from ENSDF (2011Re14). Compilers obtain relative I|g=0.000101 {I22} and absolute %I|g=1.08|*10{+-4} {I24} using I|g(112.549|g)/I|g(81.198|g)=6.6 {I12}/100 {I12} from the adopted levels in ENSDF (2011Re14) and I|g(81.198|g) from 2021Ju03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI$no intensity given by 2021Ju03. Compilers obtain relative I|g=0.000046 {I8} and absolute %Ig=4.9|*10{+-5} {I9} using I|g(187.3|g)/I|g(81.198|g)=3.0 {I4}/100 {I12} from the adopted levels in ENSDF (2011Re14) and I|g(81.198|g) from 2021Ju03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$2021Ju03 quote value from ENSDF (2011Re14). Compilers obtain relative I|g=0.000021 {I11} and absolute %I|g=2.3|*10{+-5} {I12} using I|g(212.8|g)/I|g(81.198|g)=0.00015 {I7}/0.011 {I2} from 1984Vy01 and I|g(81.198|g) from 2021Ju03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Compilers obtain absolute %I|g=2.28|*10{+-3} {I6} 
E$differs by 3|s from the value obtained from level energy difference 
E$From {+161}Tb |b{+-} decay in ENSDF (2011Re14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.) calculated directly from the adopted B(E2)|^ 
M all data agree with pure E2 assignment, namely, K/L=0.54 (1961Jo10), L1/L2/L3=0.11/0.98/1.00 (1961Ha23), and |a(K)exp=2.1 (evaluator's combination of I|g from 1971Wo09 and Ice from 1961Jo10). All data are from {+162}Ho |e decays. 
M from 162HO decay, K/L=0.54 (1961Jo10) and L1/L2/L3= 0.11/0.98/1.00 (1961Ha23) which agree with E2 assignment, for which the theoretical values are 0.55 and 0.10/0.95/1.00. 
M from 162HO decay, EKC=2.1 from RI data of 1971Wo09 and ICE data of 1961Jo10 normalized to give EKC(185.0)=0.200. Theoretical KC for an E2 is 1.82. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M the data agree reasonably well with pure E2, namely, K/L=2.3 {I5}, 2.2, and 2.1 (1967Ba34,1961Jo10,1961Ha23), L1/L2/L3=0.38/1.15/1.00 (1961Ha23), and |a(K)exp=0.19 {I3} (1967Ba34) (evaluator's combination of I|g from 1971Wo09 and Ice from 1961Jo10). Data are from {+161}Dy(n,|g) for 1967Ba34 and otherwise from {+162}Ho |e decays. 
M,MR from (N,G) study (1967Ba34), EKC=0.190 34 and K/L=2.3 5 which agree with theory values KC(E2)=0.200 and K/L(E2)=2.42. EMC and ENC also given. 
M from 162HO decay, K/L=2.2 (1961Jo10), K/L=2.1 (1961Ha23), L1/L2/L3=0.38/1.15/1.00 (1961Ha23) which agree with an E2 assignment, for which the theoretical values are 2.42 and 0.75/1.24/1.00. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M,MR the data agree with a pure E2 assignment, namely, |a(K)exp=0.066 (evaluator's combination of I|g from 1971Wo09 and Ice from 1961Jo10), and K/L=3.7 (1961Jo10). Data are from {+162}Ho |e decays. 
M,MR from (N,G) (2006Ap01), EKC=0.058 1. G assigned as pure E2. 
M from 162HO decay, K/L=3.7 (1961Jo10 - the data in this reference conflict, they give both 3.4 and 3.75), K/L LT 4.2 (1961Ha23) which agree with an E2 assignment, for which the theoretical value is 3.67. 
M from 162HO decay, EKC=0.066 from RI data of 1971Wo09 and ICE data of 1961Jo10 normalized to give EKC(185.0)=0.200. Theoretical KC for an E2 is 0.058. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 2.08 {I7} ({+162}Tb |b{+-} decay); and and 1.93 {I7} (n,|g). Other: 1.4 {I1} (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR from (n,n'|g). From |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I1} or 0.0043, |g is E2 with |d>5.4 or >1.7, respectively [2006Ap01, from (n,|g), or 1982Fi15, from (|a,2n|g)]. From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q), |d>+41.1 or <-8.3 [1980Hu06, from (n,|g)], |d>29 (1972Do01 from Coul. ex.), and |d<-2.9 or >+11.4 [1977Ho11 from (n,n'|g)]. 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), MR=0.51 +8-10 or MR GT +41.1 or LT -7.7 and MR GT 3.4 or LT -8.3 from another cascade (1980Hu06). 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=+0.25 +5-2 (1982Fi15), which is not the correct choice. 
M,MR from (A,2NG) (1982Fi15), EKC=0.0043 6, which gives E2 + LT 25% M1, or MR**2 GT 1.7**2 . 
MR from G(THETA) in (N,G) (1972Do01), MR**2 GE 29**2. 
MR from G(THETA) in (N,N'G) (1977Ho11), MR = -0.6 3 or MR LT -2.9 or GT +11.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.) is computed from B(E2)|^=0.122 {I5}, in Coul. ex. 
RI weighted average of: 90 {I4}, from {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay; 90 {I6}, from (n,n'|g); and 92 {I3}, from (n,|g). Other: 126 {I9}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E average of: 372.20 {I9} (from (n,n'|g)); 372.56 {I15} (from muonic atom); and 372.75 {I8} (from Coul. ex.). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 20.3 {I11} (n,n'|g); 19.2 {I6} ({+162}Tb |b{+-} decay); 17 {I3} ({+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min)); and 19.8 {I11} (n,|g). 
M,MR |d is from (n,n'|g). From |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I2} in (n,|g), 2006Ap01 report |d>4.5. From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d>+11.7 or <-10.4 (1980Hu06). 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G) study MR = -0.18 +9-10 or MR GT +11.7 or LT -10.4 (1980Hu06). 
M,MR from (N,G) (1967Ba34), EKC=0.0058 20, interpreted as E2 + LT 40% M1. ELC also given. 
MR 2006Ap01 report |d>4.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR from (n,n'|g). From |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I6} or 0.0032 {I1}, |g is E2 with |d>1.1 or >12, respectively, [1982Fi15 from (|a,2n|g) or 2006Ap01 from (n,|g)]. From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=+2.6 {I+53-16} (1980Hu06). 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), MR=2.6 +53-16 (1980Hu06). 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), the smaller MR=+0.33 5 (1982Fi15), which is not the correct choice. 
M,MR from (A,2NG) (1982Fi15), EKC=0.0041 6 which gives E2 + 25% 20 M1, or 1.1**2 LT MR**2 LT 4.4**2. 
MR from G(THETA) in (N,N'G), (1977Ho11), MR=+0.21 11 or MR LT -6.3 or GT +19. 
M,MR from 162HO decay (67.0 M), EKC=0.0068 from RI data of 1971Wo09 and ICE data of 1961Jo10, normalized to give EKC(185.0)=0.201. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR from (n,n'|g). From |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I2} and 0.0033 {I5}, |g is E2 with %M1<10 [2006Ap01, (n,|g), and 1982Fi15, (|a,2n|g)]. From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q), |d=-5.3 {I+2-126} [1980Hu06 from (n,|g)], |d=-2.4 {I+8-47} (1972Do01 from Coul. ex.). From the results of 1967Ba34, 1972Do01 and 1980Hu06, -7.1<|d<-4.0. 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), MR=-5.3 +21-126 (1980Hu06). 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=-0.1 1 (1982Fi15), which is not the correct choice. 
M,MR from (A,2NG), (1982Fi15), EKC=0.0033 5, which gives E2. 
M,MR from (N,G) (1967Ba34), EKC=0.00341 85, interpreted as E2 + LT 6% M1. ELC are given. 
MR from G(THETA) in (N,G) (1972Do01), MR=-2.4 +8-47, which is equivalent to an M1 content of 15% 13. 
MR from G(THETA) in (N,N'G) (1977Ho11), MR LT -0.4 or MR GT +2.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 59 {I3}, from (n,|g); and 53 {I4}, from (n,n'|g). From {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min), I|g=84 {I7}. 
M from (n,|g) (2006Ap01), |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I1}, which is interpreted as E2+<7%M1, supporting the assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 18.0 {I14}, from {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay; and 20.7 {I9}, from (n,|g). 
MR from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=-0.03 {I16} (1980Hu06), which is compatible with pure E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), smaller |d=-0.15 {I+30-10} (1982Fi15) and from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=-0.04<|d<+0.06 (1980Hu06). From {+162}Dy(n,n'|g), |d(M2/E1)=+0.04 {I+16-11}. 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), -0.04 LT MR LT +0.06 (1980Hu06) if G is mostly E1 and J=2. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=-0.15 +30-10 (1982Fi15). 
M,MR from (N,G), (1967Ba34), EKC=0.0211 38, which gives E1 + LT 1% M2 (or MR LT 0.10). ELC also given. 
MR from G(THETA) in (N,N'G), (1977Ho11), MR=-0.08 30 if J(1148)=2. Another value is given if J(1148)=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR from |a(K)exp in (n,|g) (2006Ap01). |d{+2}=1.4 {I+8-4} from I|g and Alaga-rule considerations [1978Ge03 in (n,|g)]. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI from 2006Ap01, (n,|g). From {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min), I|g=18.6 {I10}. Other: 28 {I2}, from (n,n'|g). 
M,MR from (n,n'|g). From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=+3.9 {I+41-15} (1980Hu06). 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), MR=+3.9 +41-15 (1980Hu06). 
M,MR from (N,G) (1967Ba34), EKC=0.0069 35, interpreted as E2 + LT 60% M1. ENC also given. 
MR from (A,2NG) (1982Fi15), EKC=0.0126 19, which gives M1 + LE 50% E2 or MR**2 LT 1.0**2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR from (n,n'|g). From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q), |d<-62.7 or >+4.8 and |d<-2.7 or >+14.3, (1980Hu06,1977Ho11). So, |d<-62 or >+14. From (|a,2n|g) (1982Fi15), |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I6}, which gives |d=1.5 {I+15-5}. 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), MR GT +4.8 or LT -62.7 (1980Hu06). 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG) study, smaller MR = 0.00 3 (1982Fi15), which is not the correct choice. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from 2006Ap01 (n,|g). Others: 9.0 {I15}, from (n,n'|g); and 10 {I2}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 20.4 {I12}, from (n,n'|g), and 25 {I3}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). From (n,|g), I|g=21.5 {I5}, but |g has two placements there. 
RI from I|g(321.9|g)/I|g(1129.3|g) in {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) and I|g(1129.6|g), I|g=30 {I4}. Thus, most, if not all, of the intensity in this peak is associated with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 59 {I3}, from (n,n'|g); 59 {I3}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min); and 62 {I3}, from (n,|g). Other: 86 {I18}, from {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay. 
MR from (n,n'|g). From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d(M2/E1)=-0.19 {I+14-15} (1980Hu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
B(E1)(W.u.) is computed from B(E1)|^=1.47|*10{+-4} {I25} in (|g,|g'). 
RI from 2006Ap01, (n,|g). From {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay, where coincidence data were used to get the singlet value, I|g=52 {I14}. 
M from (n,|g) (2006Ap01) and (|a,2n|g) (1982Fi15), |a(K)exp=0.00063 {I2} and 0.0003 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from 2006Ap01 (n,|g). From (n,n'|g), I|g=23.6 {I15}. From (n,|g), 1967Ba34 report I|g=22 {I4}, while 1995Be02 report I|g=13.8 {I23}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0076 {I27}, |g is E1 [1967Ba34 from (n,|g)]. From |g(|q), the smaller |d(M2/E1)=+0.02 {I6} [1982Fi15 from (|a,2n|g)], which agrees. From (n,n'|g), 2002Go15 report both |d(M2/E1)=-0.01 {I3} and +0.01 {I4}. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=+0.02 6 (1982Fi15). 
M,MR from (N,G) study (1967Ba34), EKC=0.0076 27, which gives E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(141)/I|g(263)=0.086 {I13} in (n,|g) (1978Ge03). |g not reported by 2006Ap01. 
M,MR from I|g(141)/I|g(263) in (n,|g) and Alaga-rule considerations, 1978Ge03 deduce |d=0.67 {I8}. 
E from 1978Ge03, (N,G). 
MR MR**2=0.45 +13-9 from RI and Alaga rules (1978Ge03 in (N,G)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR from (|a,2n|g) (1982Fi15), |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I5}, which gives primarily E2. From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) (1980Hu06), |d<-2.3 or > +17.9. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR = +3.2 +5-2 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 53 {I4}, in (n,n'|g); 59 {I2}, in (n,|g); and 50 {I9}, in {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). From I|g(776|g)/I|g(1059|g) in ({+7}Li,p4n|g), I|g=45 {I5}. From ({+61}Ni,{+60}Ni|g), I|g=68 {I8}. 
M,MR placement requires E2 but, from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I5}, which gives M1 with |d<1.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from (n,|g). From {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay, I|g=46 {I14}. 
M,MR measurements are compatible with pure E1. From |a(K)exp=0.0011 {I5}, |g is E1 with |d<0.27 [1967Ba34 from (n,|g)]. From |g|g(|q) and |g(|q), |d=-0.08 {I12} and |d=-0.2 {I+5-6} [1980Hu06 from (n,|g) and 1977Ho11 from (n,n'|g)]. 2002Go15, in (n,n'|g), report |d=-0.07 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI value from (n,|g). |g is a doublet in most studies. 
M from (n,|g) (1967Ba34) and (|a,2n|g) (1982Fi15), |a(K)exp=0.00056 {I28} and 0.0003 {I1}, which gives E1 with |d<0.17, but in both cases |g has two placements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of: 36.0 {I14}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min); and 38.2 {I15}, from (n,|g). Other: 60 {I5}, from (n,n'|g). From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=0.04 {I+38-30} (1980Hu06) if J(1390)=5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0008 {I2} in (|a,2n|g), mult=E1. From |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), -0.94<|d<-0.09 if J=5 (1980Hu06). In (n,n'|g), |d=+0.05 {I5}. 
MR from GG(THETA) in (N,G), -0.94 LT MR LT -0.09 (1980Hu06) if J(1390)=5. 
M,MR from (N,G) (1967Ba34), EKC GT 0.0013, interpreted as not E1, but G may have two placements. 
M,MR from (A,2NG), EKC=0.0008 2, which gives mult=E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from {+162}Ho |e decay (evaluator's combination of 1961Ha23 and 1971Wo09), |a(K)exp=0.022, which gives primarily E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from (n,|g). Others: 60.7 {I18}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (15.0 min); 72.0 {I4}, from (n,n'|g); and 84 {I16}, from {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M 2002Go15 report mult=M1+E2. From |a(K)exp=0.00230 in (n,|g), 2006Ap01 give mult=M1. However, a |DK=0 transition such as this is expected to have an E0 contribution. 
MR from 2002Go15 (n,n'|g). 
CC value computed using the listed mult and |d. No contribution from a possible E0 contribution is included. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E from {+162}Ho (67.0 min) |e decay. |g not reported by 2006Ap01 in (n,|g). 
RI from I|g(1453.7|g)/I|g(1372.7|g) in {+162}Ho (67.0 min) |e decay and I|g(1372.7|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from (n,|g) 
RI from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). Other: 0.94 {I8}, from (n,|g). 
M from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) (evaluator's combination of 1961Ha23 and 1971Wo09), |a(K)exp=0.35, which gives M1. 
MR from |a(K)exp in (n,|g) (2006Ap01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E from (n,|g) 
RI from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). Other: 1.42 {I6}, from (n,|g). 
M from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) (evaluator's combination of 1961Ha23 and 1971Wo09), |a(K)exp=0.025, which gives primarily E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E from (n,|g). 
RI weighted average of: 40 {I3}, from (n,n'|g); 44.0 {I9}, from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min); and 45 {I3}, from (n,|g). 
M from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) (evaluator's combination of 1961Jo10 and 1971Wo09) and (|a,2n|g) (1982Fi15), |a(K)exp=0.016 and 0.0014 {I4}, respectively, which give E1. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR = -0.05 5 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E from (n,|g). 
M,MR from (n,|g) (1967Ba34) and {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) (evaluator's combination of 1961Jo10 and 1971Wo09), |a(K)exp=0.0006 {I3} and 0.009, interpretation of the former is E1 with |d<0.17 and from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=-0.31 {I+23-40} (1980Hu06). Adopted |d|<0.18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI from (|a,2n|g). Other: 16 {I2} from ({+7}Li,p4n|g); and 30, from I|g(307|g)/I|g(941|g) in ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from 2006Ap01 (n,|g). From (|a,2n|g), 2006Ap01 report I|g=110 {I45} 
MR from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), |d=0.24 {I+39-21} (1980Hu06), if J(1518)=5. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=-0.1 2 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI from (n,n'|g), where |g is doubly placed. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=+0.04 3 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG) study, smaller MR=-0.10 10 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min). 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR = +0.08 16 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from 1982Fi15 (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0004 {I1}, which gives mult=E1. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=-0.09 6 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I9}, which gives |d=1.5 {I+10-5} 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG) study, smaller MR = +0.6 2 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from (|a,2n|g) 
RI weighted average of: 32 {I4} ({+7}Li,p4n|g); and 30 {I5} (|a,2n|g). 
M,MR from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I9}, which gives E2+M1 with |d=1.4, or E1+M2 with |d=0.5. 
MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), smaller |d=+0.10 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E from (|a,2n|g) 
M from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2}, which gives mult=E1. 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR = -0.06 6 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E0,E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0018 {I1} in (n,|g), 2006Ap01 give mult=M1. However, a |DK=0 transition such as this is unlikely to Be pure M1. Some E0+E2 contribution is expected. From (n,n'|g), 2002Go15 report |d(E2/M1)=-0.20 {I+15-18} or +4.3 {I+57-18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E from (n,n'|g). |g not reported by 2006Ap01 in (n,|g). 
RI from I|g(1728.5|g)/I|g(1647.6|g) in (n,n'|g) and I|g(1647.6|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 2006Ap01 (|a,2n|g). 2006Ap01, in (n,|g), do not report this |g. This |g is also not reported in ({+7}Li,p4n|g). 
RI from 2006Ap01, (|a,2n|g). From ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g), 2001Wu05 report I|g(691)/I|g(569)=63 {I27}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay. From {+162}Ho |e decay (15.0 min), I|g=87 {I13}. From (n,n'|g), I|g=113 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E poor energy fit, level-energy difference=676.8 keV. Note that |g is doubly placed. |g is not included in the least-squares fit to obtain the level energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E from (|a,2n|g). |g not reported in ({+7}Li,p4n|g). 
MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), smaller |d=+0.05 {I5} (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E from (|a,2n|g). From 2002Ju08, ({+7}Li,p4n|g), E|g=1037.8 {I2}. 
M from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp|<0.0016, which gives mult=E1 
MR from G(THETA) in (A,2NG), smaller MR=+0.3 1 (1982Fi15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from (n,n'|g). From |b{+-} decay, I|g(1902)/I|g(1982)=1.03. From (n,|g), this ratio is 0.17, but I|g(1902|g) is listed there as 2.7 {I30}, so there may Be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
B(M1)(W.u.) is that reported by 2001Wu05, in ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g). 
M from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I9}, which gives mult=M1. 2001Wu05 state that the M1 component dominates the |DJ=0 transitions connecting the g.s. and S bands. A small E2 component, of course, is not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI most of the intensity of this peak is associated with the other placement. See the comment in the (n,|g) data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(430.4|g)/I|g(957.0|g) in (|a,2n|g) and I|g(955.8|g). |g not reported in the heavy-ion studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from (|a,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0008 {I2}, which is interpreted as E1, but peak is doublet including an E1 |g from the 1210 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI computed from I|g(272|g)/I|g(447|g) in ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g) and I|g(447). 2002Ju08, ({+7}Li,p4n|g), report I|g<15. 
B(E2)(W.u.) is from 2001Wu05 ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from 2002Ju08, ({+7}Li,p4n|g). 2001Wu05, in ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g), report I|g(1160|g)/I|g(633|g)=1.36 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI from 2001Wu05 (1620y,{+162}Dy'|g). 2002Ju08, ({+7}Li,p4n|g), report I|g<13. 
B(E2)(W.u.) is from 2001Wu05 ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI from 2002Ju08, ({+7}Li,p4n|g). The value from 2001Wu05 in ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g) differs from this. 
B(E2)(W.u.) is from 2001Wu05 ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from 2002Ju08, ({+7}Li,p4n|g). The value from 2001Wu05 in ({+162}Dy,{+162}Dy'|g) differs from this. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M,MR from (n,n'|g). See the comment on this point in the Adopted Gammas. 
CC value computed using the listed mult and |d. No contribution from a possible E0 contribution is included. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI Computed from Ice(1400K)/Ice(1319K)=0.31 {I2} (1975Ed02), |a(K)(1319)=0.00148, and |a(K)(1400)/|a(L)(1400)=7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M,MR from 2002Go15 (n,n'|g) 
CC value computed using the listed mult and |d. No contribution from a possible E0 contribution is included. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator by subtracting the contribution (1.9 {I2}) from the 15-min activity from the observed I|g value (3.8 {I3}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator by subtracting the contribution (1.6 {I3}) from the 15-min activity from the observed I|g value (4.7 {I2}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI Contribution from 15-min activity subtracted, even though it is not shown explicitly in {+162}Dy |e decay (15 min) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(219.6|g)/I|g(917.2|g) from 1971Wo09 and I|g(917.2|g). |g not reported by 1999Za15. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(236.0|g)/I|g(333.9|g) in (n,|g) and I|g(333.9|g), one computes I|g(236.0|g)=2.2 {I4}. However, the 333.9|g is itself complex (1999Za15) and thus this deduced value is an upper limit. See the comment on the 333.95 |g. 1999Za15 report I|g=15.8 {I2} for this |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI 1999Za15 indicate that this |g is a doublet. Evaluator has assumed that all the intensity is associated with this placement. Thus, this listed value is an upper limit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI computed from I|g(329.4|g)/I|g(842.0|g) (from 1971Wo09) and I|g(842.0|g). 1999Za15 report I|g=3.5 {I2} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI listed value is close to that expected from (n,|g). Thus, most of the intensity of this doublet is associated with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI computed from I|g(90|g)/I|g(329.8|g) in (|a,2n|g) and I|g(392.8|g). 1999Za15 report I|g=37 {I8} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
B(M1)=0.010. Value computed by the evaluator from B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0058, as reported by 2001Wu05. 
M 2001Wu05 state that the M1 component dominates the |DJ=0 transitions connecting the g.s. and S bands. A small E2 component, of course, is not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.45 {I+17-37}. Value computed by the evaluator from the E2 matrix element=-3.36 eb {I+191-58} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.28 {I+34-10}. Value computed by the evaluator from the E2 matrix element=-2.85 eb {I+55-139} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
B(E2)=0.33 {I11}. Value computed by the evaluator from the E2 matrix element=3.10 eb {I+47-59} 
RI from the relative B(E2) values of the 522.3 and 610.0 |g's as reported by 2001Wu05, the evaluator computes I|g(610.0|g)=43 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI this relative I|g value is much larger than that reported in other studies, e.g., from 2006Ap01 in (n,|g), who give I|g(512.4|g)/I|g(795.3|g)=0.0158 {I10}. The evaluator has assumed that most of the listed intensity for this |g belongs elsewhere in the level scheme. 
M 2006Ap01 report %E2=96.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E value given on the level-scheme drawing of 2002Ju08, but not listed in their level-scheme table (their Table II). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E computed from the level-energy difference according to the placement given by 2002Ju08 in their level-scheme table (their Table II). The E|g value shown in this level-scheme table is 291.8. The only reported level near this implied final-state energy (1667.1 keV) is the 8+ member of the |g-vibrational band (at 1669.8 keV). From J|p considerations only, this could be a possible placement, but these authors do not place it here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=0.95 {I7} 
Initial level listed as 388 in the level-scheme table of 2002Ju08 (their Table II) seems to be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E value from 1967Ba34. 1995Be02 and 2006Ap01 do not list this |g in their data. The evaluator has not included it in the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI 1995Be02 report I|g=19 {I2} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 
RI from I|g(321.9|g)/I|g(1129.3|g) in {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) and I|g(1129.6|g), I|g=30 {I4}. Thus, most, if not all, of the intensity in this peak is associated with this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
M,MR from 2002Go15, (n,n'|g). From |a(K)exp=0.00230, 2006Ap01 report mult=M1. See the comment on this point in the Adopted Gammas. 
CC value computed from the listed mult and |d. The contribution from a possible E0 component has not been included. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01, who show this |g as unplaced. 1995Be02 report E|g=372.40 {I3} and I|g=2.3 {I2} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). They also show it as triply placed, with the other placements being from the 1904 and 1669 levels. This former level is not reported by 2006Ap01; and 2006Ap01 place a 372.074 |g from the latter level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01. 1995Be02 report E|g=685.3 {I2} and I|g=1.3 {I2} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01. 1995Be02 report E|g=1463.2 {I5} and I|g=4.5 {I10} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Shown as doubly placed by 1995Be02. The other placement, however, is from a 1895 level whose existence 2006Ap01 do not confirm. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Shown as doubly placed by 1995Be02. The other placement is from a 1895 level, but this level is not confirmed by 2006Ap01. 2006Ap01 report an unplaced 747.208 |g, with I|g=3.90, but its assigned mult, E1, is not consistent with the implied placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01, who list this |g as unplaced. This placement is that of the evaluator. 1995Be02 report E|g=1108.6 {I3} and I|g=4.0 {I8} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). They also show this peak as doubly placed, the other placement being from the 1999 level. 2006Ap01 report a 1110.84 |g from the 1999 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01. 1995Be02 report E|g=216.220 {I3} and I|g=0.7 {I3}, with the peak being doubly placed, the other placement being from the 1574 level. 2006Ap01 place a weak 216.365 |g from this level and a 216.193 |g from the 1751 level. The evaluator has assumed that the 216.193 |g is doubly placed and that the 216.365 |g is a different transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g shown as doubly placed by 1995Be02, with the other placement being from the 1535 level. 2006Ap01 show a weak 238.67 |g from this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01, who show it as unplaced. |g shown doubly placed by 1995Be02, with the other placement being from a 1895 level. 2006Ap01 do not report this latter level. 1995Be02 report E|g=1814.2 {I7} and I|g=14.7 {I14} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1995Be02 show this |g as multiply placed. But, for their placement from the 1826 level, 2006Ap01 report E|g=529.749 {I4} and, for their placement from the 1738 level, 2006Ap01 report E|g=528.901 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01. 1995Be02 report E|g=485.70 {I17} and I|g=0.76 {I14} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E also shown as deexciting the 1982.1 level by 1995Be02, but the final level implied by this placement has not been confirmed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01. 1995Be02 report E|g=850.4 {I8} and I|g=10.3 {I10} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1995Be02 show this |g as doubly placed, but, for the other placement (from the 1738 level), 2006Ap01 report E|g=441.988 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 2006Ap01. 1995Be02 report I|g=19 {I2} (after renormalization of their intensity scale). 
RI most of the intensity of this peak is associated with the other placement. See the comment for the other placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1995Be02. 2002Go15 do not show this placement. 
RI from I|g(185.3|g)/I|g(260.08|g) from 1995Be02 and I|g(260.08|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(1276|g)/I|g(1195|g) in {+162}Tb |b{+-} decay and I|g(1195|g). I|g=11.5 {I6} for the composite peak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=11.5 {I6} for the composite peak and I|g=4.7 {I13} for the other placement of this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E 2002Go15 show this as a placement in their |g line list but do not include it in their level-scheme table. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI most, possibly all, of the intensity in this peak is associated with this placement. See the comment in the {+161}Dy(n,|g) E=th data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
2002Go15 indicate that this |g may also be placed from a 1759.6 level, but no there is no other evidence for such a level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI most of the intensity must be associated with this placement (see the comment on the other placement of this |g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|g shown from both this level and the 1895.5 level. However, most of the intensity must be associated with this latter placement, otherwise the population of this 2080.6 level will be too large (private communication from the authors of 2002Go15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of E|g from (n,n'|g) and Coul. ex. This |g is not reported in (n,|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. |D|p=no from level scheme 
RI in ({+7}Li,p3n|g), 2003Ju02 report I|g(114|g)/I|g(208|g)=0.181 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from a doublet in (n,n'|g). 
RI in ({+7}Li,p3n|g), 2003Ju02 report I|g(131|g)/I|g(245|g)=0.25 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$M1 from ce data in (n,|g) is inconsistent with |D|p. Thus, the placement is questionable (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K/L/M=100 {I5}/22 {I4}/4.0 {I12} (1967Sc05). |a(K)exp=0.0307 {I6} 
$|a(K)exp={ 0.0311 {I22}} (1967Sc05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$K/L/M=100 {I10}/19 {I4}/4.4 {I22} (1967Sc05). |a(K)exp=0.0369 {I7} 
$|a(K)exp={ 0.028 {I4}} (1967Sc05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
$Level-energy difference=427.679 
$K/L=8.5 {I27} (1967Sc05). |a(K)exp=0.0265 {I11} 
$|a(K)exp={ 0.022 {I3}} (1967Sc05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0140 {I8} 
$|a(K)exp<0.0074 (1967Sc05) for 637.41 (probably 636.919+638.025 of 1989Sc31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0278 {I17} gives M1,E2 in conflict with E1 from adopted |DJ|p. Thus, the placement is uncertain, although |g|g coin is seen (1989Sc31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0089 {I12} gives E2 in conflict with E1 from adopted |DJ|p. Thus, the placement is uncertain, although |g|g coin is seen (1989Sc31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from unplaced |g's in (n,n'|g). 1989Sc31 report this |g in the level-scheme table, but not in the table of E|g values 
RI$from branching ratio (1989Sc31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) (1987Mi04,1959De29) and ce (1960Be16) 
MR$from 1959De29. Other: |d=1.6 {I1} from K/L=1.3 {I4} (1960Be16) 
$A{-2}=-0.030 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I18} (1987Mi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|eB(E2)|^=0.43 {I11} (1959De29). K/L=2.0 {I3} (1960Be16) 
$A{-2}=-0.016 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} (1987Mi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1987Mi04) 
E$395|g assigned to a 1041 level (1985Bu22) may correspond to this |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 73.394 {I13} from (n,n'|g) 
M$from ce data in {+164}Ho |e decay and (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 168.837 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=thermal; M2 is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 259.090 {I15} from (n,|g) E=thermal and 259.101 {I11} from (n,n'|g). 
E$259.101 11 in (N,N'G), 259.090 15 in (N,G) E=TH 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$519.59 3 in (N,N'G), 519.4 4 in (N,G) E=TH, 519.6 5 in 164TB B- DECAY 
RI$1.75 5 from (N,N'G), 2.0 5 from 164TB B- DECAY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR$from Coulomb excitation 
E$688.422 10 in (N,N'G), 688.44 15 in (N,G) E=TH, 688.46 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 688.6 2 in (D,PG), 689.3 5 in 164HO EC DECAY 
RI$from (N,N'G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$761.813 10 in (N,N'G), 761.7 2 in (N,G) E=TH, 761.71 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 761.8 3 in (D,PG), 762.4 5 in 164HO EC DECAY 
RI$96.2 21 in (N,N'G), 75 21 in (N,G) E=TH, 81 5 in 164TB B- DECAY, 92 11 in (D,PG), 96.6 17 in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$585.985 13 in (N,N'G), 585.90 10 in (N,G) E=TH, 585.90 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 586.1 4 in (D,PG) 
RI$17.7 4 in (N,N'G), 26 5 in (N,G) E=TH, 17.9 18 in 164TB B- DECAY, 21 3 in (D,PG), 18.2 15 in Coul ex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M,MR$M1+E2 from ce data in (d,p|g), |d(E2/M1)=70 {I+180-30} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 
E$754.817 10 in (N,N'G), 754.80 15 in (N,G) E=TH, 754.77 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 754.7 3 in (D,PG) 
RI$from (N,N'G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 154.24 {I25} from (n,n'|g) 
E$154.24 25 in (N,N'G), 154.18 3 in (N,G) E=TH 
RI$0.68 24 in (N,N'G), 0.60 12 in (N,G) E=TH 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 415 {I1} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 415.00 {I50} from (n,|g) E=th, and 414.79 {I20} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 1.4 {I5} in (n,n'|g) and 2.3 {I12} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 62 {I30} in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$842.610 11 in (N,N'G), 843.2 4 in (N,G) E=TH, 843.0 10 in 164TB B- DECAY, 842.9 3 in (D,PG) 
M$from ce data in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 148.696 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th and 148.700 {I19} from (n,n'|g). 
E$148.700 19 in (N,N'G), 148.696 10 in (N,G) E=TH, 148.76 5 in 164TB B- DECAY, 148.6 6 in (D,PG) 
RI$unweighted average of 18.5 {I15} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay (3.0 m), 14.3 {I23} from (n,|g) E=th, 13.1 {I7} from (d,p|g), and 16.4 {I6} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$215.104 10 in (N,N'G), 215.08 15 in (N,G) E=TH, 215.07 5 in 164TB B- DECAY, 215.0 4 in (D,PG) 
M$E1 from ce data in (d,p|g), D(+Q) from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th and |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); |d(Q/D)=-0.03 {I8} from |g|g(|q) may suggest small M2 admixture 
MR$Other: -0.05 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 903.0 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 903.55 {I18} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 0.65 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.75 {I15} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 196.47 {I10} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 3.7 {I19} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 3.7 {I6} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$523.329 23 in (N,N'G), 523.31 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 523.0 4 in (D,PG) 
RI$14.0 5 in (N,N'G), 11.1 19 in 164TB B- DECAY, 14.7 15 in Coul. ex. 
RI$weighted average of 11.1 {I19} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 14.0 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 14.7 {I15} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$Others: -0.19 {I6} in Coul. ex., +33 {I+17-8} in (n,n'|g) 
E$782.406 11 in (N,N'G), 782.4 3 in (N,G) E=TH, 782.62 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 782.4 4 in (D,PG) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th. Others: 123.32 {I6} in (n,n'|g), 123.22 {I5} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average of 17.5 {I18} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 12.7 {I19} from (n,|g) E=th, and 16.1 {I8} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 211.108 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th and 211.097 {I13} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 73 {I8} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 52 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th, 56 {I7} from (d,p|g), and 60.6 {I17} from (n,n'|g). 
M$(E1) from ce data in (d,p|g), D(+Q) from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th. |d(Q/D)=+0.29 {I26} from |g|g(|q) may suggest small M2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 796.7 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 797.18 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 10 {I4} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 
E$965.914 16 in (N,N'G), 966 2 in (N,G) E=TH, 966.0 5 in 164TB B- DECAY 
RI$16.7 5 in (N,N'G), 10 in (N,G) E=TH, 18 5 in 164TB B- DECAY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$98.21 18 in (N,N'G), 98.127 6 in (N,G) E=TH, 98.09 10 in 164TB B- DECAY, 98.7 3 in (D,PG) 
RI$weighted average of 6.7 {I10} in (n,n'|g), 3.9 {I6} in (n,|g) E=th, and 4.5 {I15} in {+164}Tb |b{+-}. Other: 44 {I7} in (d,p|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 145.88 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th and 145.95 {I20} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 2.2 {I4} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 206.80 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 206.78 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th, 207.1 {I5} from (d,p|g), and 206.78 {I3} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 19.3 {I8} in (n,n'|g), 19 {I4} in (n,|g) E=th, 23.6 {I30} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: intensity is discrepant in (d,p|g), thus not included in averaging. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$294.554 11 in (N,N'G), 294.58 2 in (N,G) E=TH, 294.65 5 in 164TB B- DECAY, 295.3 7 in (D,PG) 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th and |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); polarity from level-parity change determined based on other experimental evidence. |d(Q/D)=+0.11 {I+21-17} from |g|g(|q) may suggest small M2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 131.0 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 131.4 {I2} from (d,p|g). Not reported in Coul. Ex. and (n,n'|g). Poor fit, level-energy difference=128.94 
RI$from (d,p|g). Other: |?100 in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$652.231 19 in (N,N'G), 653.8 10 in (N,G) E=TH, 654.5 5 in 164TB B- DECAY, 653.0 10 in (D,PG) 
M,MR$from (n,n'|g). Other: (E2) from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$911.34 3 in (N,N'G), 911.3 10 in (N,G) E=TH 
RI$weighted average of 64.9 {I20} in (n,n'|g) and 64.1 {I16} in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th. Others: 185.93 {I25} in (n,n'|g), 185.84 {I20} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} DECAY, 185.9 5 in (D,PG) 
RI$weighted average of 6.3 {I14} in (n,n'|g), 7.5 {I25} in (n,|g) E=th, and 18 {I6} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 32 {I5} in (d,p|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 200.50 {I15} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 200.52 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 200.53 {I9} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 24 {I12} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 13 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 10.6 {I11} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 309.08 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 309.12 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 309.4 {I5} from (d,p|g), and 309.180 {I15} from (n,n'|g). 
M$E1 from ce data in (d,p|g), D(+Q) from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th. |d(Q/D)=+0.12 {I20} from |g|g(|q) may suggest small M2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 417.5 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 417.6 {I2} from Coulomb excitation. 
M$Q from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation; M2 is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 465.05 {I20} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 466.1 {I5} from (d,p|g), and 465.37 {I15} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+168}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 67 {I10} in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$548.82 3 in (N,N'G), 548.54 20 in (N,G) E=TH, 548.54 20 in 164TB B- DECAY, 549.2 6 in (D,PG) 
RI$weighted average of 42 {I3} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 79 {I16} from (d,p|g), and 38.1 {I9} from (n,n'|g). Other: |? 100 in (n,|g) E=th 
M$from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1652.5 {I15} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1650.0 {I11} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 344.8 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$other: 100 {I20} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 810 {I1} in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: <29 from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 1015.5 {I10} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: <18 from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 1104.3 {I10} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 22 {I4} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1170.4 {I3}. This |g was not used in the least-squares fit procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$If J|p(2173)=4+, this transition to 977, 2- level would be questionable from RUL, as deduced B(M2)(W.u.)=120 {I+60-100} is too large to be realistic 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1345.29 {I18} from (n,|g) E=th and 1345.22 {I11} from (n,n'|g). Not observed in {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$I(1345|g)/I(1411|g)=54 {I5}/100 {I8} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1411.0 {I15} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay, 1411.30 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1411.48 {I9} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Intensity is discrepant in (n,|g) E=th and (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1154.8 {I10} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1155.3 {I4} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 21 {I4} in (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1278.2 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1278.58 {I18} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 52 {i5} is discrepant in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1366.0 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1366.24 {I23} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 28 {i5} is discrepant in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 617.82 {I20} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 617.74 {I12} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1289.8 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1289.8 {I3} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 35 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 42 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1377.5 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1377.41 {I17} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 44 {I7} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 41 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1443.9 {I5} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1443.90 {I21} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$weighted average of 70 {I7} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 51 {I9} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2132.0 {I10} from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay and 2132.7 {I6} from (n,n'|g). 
RI$from {+164}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 31 {I6} in (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from |g|g. Other: I|g=28 {I3}, based on Branching for 843|g in Adopted Gammas and I|g(673.76|g)=44 {I4} (1971Gu18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from figure 13 of 1971Gu18. I|g=27 {I4} quoted in authors' table seems high since it creates an intensity imbalance at 762 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 23.0 {I23} (1964Sc25) and 20.0 {I24} (1966Ne06). 
M$consistent with |g|g(|q) results 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$16.3<|d<-31.5, chosen on the basis of model-dependent arguments 
RI$I|g(688.4|g)/I|g(761.7|g)=0.99 {I8} (1980Hu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(585.9|g)/I|g(754.8|g)=0.26 {I4} (1980Hu06). 
(586|g)(169|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 15.0 {I15} (1964Sc25) and 11.6 (1966Ne06). 
(215|g)(762|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} 
(215|g)(688|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.050 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
(211|g)(585|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I21} 
(211|g)(755|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.27 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
(295|g)(585|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I14}, A{-2}=-0.02 {I21} 
(295|g)(755|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.050 {I26}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
(611|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.09 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I15} is consistent with mult(611|g)=E2, if J|p(1588)=4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 688.46 19 (1978De41), 688.4 4 (1976Ba34); 688.8 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 51 {I7} (1976Ba34) 
MR$-0.41 {I3} or >+28 from 0.0<1/|d<+0.036 (2017Go07); |d=-0.67 {I+57-35} or -2.1 to +9.5 (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 761.87 10 (1978De41), 761.7 2 (1976Ba34); 762.2 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$others: 37 {I6} (1976Ba34), I|g(761.87|g)/I|g(688.46|g)=0.859 (1984De31); 0.83 {I7} (1980Ab13); 0.80 {I17} (1978De41) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E other: 585.5 2 (1976Ba34), 586.2 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$others: 6.1 {I7} (1976Ba34), I|g(585.5|g)/I|g(754.86|g)=0.22 {I3} (1980Ab13), 0.224 (1984De31) 
$1/|d=-0.002 {I17} (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 754.86 10 (1978De41), 754.8 2 (1976Ba34); 755.2 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 49 {I7} (1976Ba34) 
MR$from 1/|d=+0.014 {I10} (2017Go07). Others: +0.23 {I13} or -6.3 to +11.4 (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$ Others: 673.66 10 (1978De41), 673.3 2 (1976Ba34); 674.2 5 (1980Ab13). 
$Others: |d=+2.7 {I+87-13} or -0.49 {I+28-35} (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 842.7 2 (1978De41), 843.1 6 (1980Ab13); 844.3 10 (1976Ba34). 
RI$others: 2.0 {I7} (1976Ba34), I|g(842.7|g)/I|g(673.66|g)=0.575 (1984De31), 0.67 {I22} (1980Ab13), 0.71 {I15} (1978De41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$ Others: 215.23 10 (1978De41), 214.9 2 (1976Ba34), 213.8 4 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 34 {I8} (1976Ba34) 
$Other |d=+1.6 {I+21-7} or +0.14 {I33} (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Table 1 of 2017Go07, 903.59 in authors' table 2 
E$ Other: 903.0 10 (1976Ba34) 
RI$other: 0.13 {I7} (1976Ba34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$others: 782.31 10 (1978De41), 781.9 2 (1976Ba34), 782.9 6 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 6.5 {I13} (1976Ba34) 
$Other |d=+0.36 {I24} or +2.4 to -57.3 (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E others: 211.0 5 (1976Ba34), 209.8 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$others: 8.8 {i17} (1976Ba34), I|g(211|g)/I|g(277.6|g)=0.57 (1984De31), 0.44 {I12} (1980Ab13). 
$|d(Q/D)=+1.8 {I+45-9} or -0.18 {I38} (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$ Others: 277.6 2 (1978De41), 277.7 2 (1976Ba34); 277.2 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 12.5 {I26} (1976Ba34) 
$Other |d=+0.02 {I16} or -4.0 {I+16-74} (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$others: 966.2 10 (1976Ba34), 966.4 6 (1980Ab13). 
RI$others: 1.7 {I7} (1976Ba34), I|g(966.2|g)/I|g(277.6|g)=0.20 (1984De31), 0.23 {I8} (1980Ab13). 
$Other |d=+0.02 {I16} or -4.0 {I+16-74} (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$others: 294.7 2 (1976Ba34), 294.2 5 (1980Ab13), 294.7 2 (1978De41). 
RI$other: 7.8 {I13} (1976Ba34) 
$Other |d=-4.7 {I+20-96} or 0.00 {I14} (1977Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 309.3 2 (1976Ba34), 308.8 4 (1980Ab13); 310.0 3 (1978De41). 
RI$other: 4.1 {I13} (1976Ba34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$others: 548.5 2 (1976Ba34), 549.1 4 (1980Ab13). 
E$Placed from 1675 level in 1984De31 
RI$other: 1.2 {I2} (1976Ba34) 
$-0.03<1/|d<+0.02 (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E other: 611.0 10 (1976Ba34), 610.8 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 1.0 {I7} (1976Ba34), I|g(611|g)/I|g(548.5|g)=3.0 (1980Ab13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1582.0 5 (1976Ba34), 1581.1 (1984De31). 
RI$other: 0.6 {I1} (1976Ba34) 
$|g(|q) is isotropic 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$others: 1601.3 2 (1976Ba34), 1599.8 8 (1978De41), 1601.1 5 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 1.5 {I2} (1976Ba34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1675.0 5 (1980Ab13) 
RI$other: 1.1 {I5} from I|g(1675|g)/I|g(1601.3|g)=0.7 (1984De31), 1.2 {I3} (1980Ab13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 1642.6 10 (1976Ba34), 1642.8 8 (1978De41); 1642.7 7 (1980Ab13). 
RI$other: 2.0 {I7} (1976Ba34) 
MR$from +0.26<|d<+1.25 (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1984De31. A 1649.8|g in 1978De41, a 1650|g in 1976Ba34 and a 1649.45|g in 2017Go07 are placed from the 1892 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Ab13. A 911.1|g is also placed from the 1153.6 level by 1976Ba34, while 2017Go07 place a 910.52|g from the 1949.8 level and a 911.34|g from the 1153.6 level. 
E$others: 911.4 2 (1978De41), 911.1 4 (1976Ba34) 
RI$from 1976Ba34. Others: I|g(911.7|g)/I|g(1736.4|g)=0.27 (1984De31), 0.35 {I6} (1980Ab13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Ab13. 2017Go07 report an unplaced 1665.0|g 
RI$from I|g(1664.2|g)/I|g(911.7|g)=0.48 {I20} (1980Ab13) and I|g(1664.2|g)/I|g(1736.4|g)=0.19 (1984De31), 0.17 {I7} (1980Ab13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Ab13, but 2017Go07 place this |g from 1809.6+1978.4 levels and claim that this transition cannot be associated with the 1736 level because of their measured |g(|q). 
E$others: 1735.4 8 (1978De41); 1735.0 2 (1976Ba34). 
RI$from 1976Ba34 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 1683.0 5 (1976Ba34), 1684.9 7 (1980Ab13). 
RI$others: 0.9 {I2} (1976Ba34), I|g(1683.0|g)/I|g(1515.6|g)=0.78 (1984De31), 0.75 {I29} (1976Ba34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 1723.8 7 (1976Ba34), 1724.0 8 from unplaced G of 1978De41. 
RI$others: 1.4 {I9} (1976Ba34), from I|g(1555.5|g)/I|g(1723.8|g)=0.37 {I11} (1980Ab13). 
$|d=-0.09 {I4} or +3.0 {I4} (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 1840.5 7 (1980Ab13) 
RI$others: 1.08 {I18} (1980Ab13), I|g(1840.5|g)/I|g(1767.6|g)=0.93 (1984De31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$other: 1773.0 {I7} placed by 1984De31 from a 1773 level, but this placement is ruled out by the 1773|g(|q) in 2017Go07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1649.8 8 (1978De41), 1650 1 (1976Ba34). 
RI$other: 0.5 {I2} (1976Ba34) 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.04 {I+13-9} or +0.88 {I20} (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1838.5 10 (1976Ba34) 
RI$other: 1.0 {I3} (1976Ba34) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.10 {I5}, but 1836|g is doubly placed (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1002.5 {I9} with I|g=0.5 {I2} placed from 1920 level in 1980Ab13, but it could correspond to the 1002.35|g, doubly placed by 2017Go07 from 1979.4 and 2041.7 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1848.3 7 (1980Ab13), 1845.5 10 (1976Ba34). 
RI$other: 1.2 {I3} (1976Ba34) 
$|d=-0.38 {I4} or +17 {I+29-5} (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 972.9 8 (1980Ab13) 
RI$others: I|g(972.9|g)/I|g(1706.1|g)=0.35 (1984De31), 0.44 {I15} (1980Ab13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1906.2 2 10 (1976Ba34) 
RI$others: 0.8 {I3} (1976Ba34). 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.04 {I+11-8} or +2.5 {I+8-6} (2017Go07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1979.86 {I3}, I|g=1.73 {I6} for the triplet. 
E$others: 1979.0 5 (1976Ba34), 1979.6 9 (1980Ab13) 
RI$other: 1.1 3 for a doublet (1976Ba34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2458.2 {I5} (2017Go07) and 2457.5 {I2} (1995Jo20) 
RI$other: I|g(2458)/I|g(2531)=31 {I4}/69 {I4} (1995Jo20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2465.5 {I4} (2017Go07) and 2465.7 {I2} (1995Jo20) 
RI$other: I|g(2466)/I|g(2539)=27 {I4}/73 {I4} (1995Jo20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2504.8 {I6} (2017Go07) and 2504.5 {I2} (1995Jo20) 
RI$other: I|g(2505)/I|g(2578)=31 {I4}/69 {I4} (1995Jo20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 108.160 {I3} from {+165}Dy IT decay and 108.157 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 108.28 {I10} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 184.08 {I15} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay and 184.252 {I2} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 538.85 {I20} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay and 538.634 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1178.53 {I15} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay and 1178.46 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 100 {I21} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 1228.95 {I30} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average of 9.2 {I24} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay and 15.7 {I30} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 826.20 {I25} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay and 826.65 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$unweighted average of 52 {I9} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay and 3.8 {I7} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 1219.2 {I3} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 35 {I8} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
$Poor-fit; level-energy difference=1219.346 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 1241.65 {I25} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 44 {I8} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 1292.05 {I20} from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay 
RI$from {+165}Tb |b{+-} decay. Other: 100 {I20} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from 1965Sc09. Others: 108.165 {I15} (1962Ha46), 108.200 {I4} (1962Ni11), using Curved-crystal spectrometer 
RI$from 1972Ma06 
M$|a(K)exp=2.92 {I8} (1992Kr03), 3.4 {I2}(1964Ha19), 3.62 {I22} (1960To06); K:L2:L3:M:N=100:795:523:350:167 (1950Ca10); K:L2:L3=100 {I30}:459 {I92}:296 {I59} (1967Du05); K:L3=100:893 {I72} (1960Ho16), 100:770 {I59} (1964Ha19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from ce in 1967Du05 only. 
M$from L1:L2:M=100 {I50}:16 {I8}:26 {I13}; ce(L1) and ce(M) may include contributions from ce(K)(67.7|g), and ce(L)(29.9|g), respectively (1967Du05) 
$Ice(L1)=4.6 {I23}, Ice(L2)=0.74 {I37}, Ice(M)=1.2 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 (1967Du05) is inconsistent with E1+M2 required by |DJ|p, deduced |a(K)exp is too high to be consistent with any of these multipolarities. It is likely the Ice(K) of a single |g in 1967Du05 is for a multiplet of several |g rays with very close energies in 1990Ka21 
$Ice(K)=0.006 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.078 {I5}, Ice(L12)=0.013 
M$assumed as the normalization reference with |a(K)=0.0102 {I2} from BrIcc for deducing conversion coefficients from relative I(ce) and relative I|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.050 {I4}, Ice(L12)=0.0074 {I22}, likely for a doublet 
E$1965Sc09 placed it also from 1158.4 level 
M$|a(K)exp is too high to be consistent with any of E1, M1, E2; |DJ|p requires (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1)=0.07 {I4} 
E$from 1965Sc09; outside the range in 1990Ka21. Poor-fit; level-energy difference=34.835 
RI$from 1967Du05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.07 in 1967Du05 using I|g=0.04 {I1}; but a(K)exp using I|g here (1990Ka21) is too high to be consistent with any multipolarity 
$Ice(K)=0.0030 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.02 in 1967Du05 using I|g=0.6 {I2}; but a(K)exp using I|g here (1990Ka21) is too high to be consistent with any multipolarity 
$Ice(K)=0.0120 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.023 using I|g=0.13 {I4} is inconsistent with E1+M2 required by |DJ|p; deduced |a(K)exp from I|g here is too high to be consistent with M1+E2 or E1 
$Ice(K)=0.0030 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) from 1967Du05 using their I|g=0.4 {I1}, but deduced |a(K)exp using I|g here (1990Ka21) is too high to be consistent with M1, E1, or E2. 
$Ice(K)=0.0017 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E1 from 1967Du05 using their I|g=0.80 {I12}, but deduced |a(K)exp using I|g here (1990Ka21) is too high to be consistent with any multipolarity. 
$Ice(K)=0.0070 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from table 2 of 1990Ka21; not listed in authors' table 6. Placement treated as tentative by the evaluators 
E$level-energy difference=320.586 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.00020 {I10}, Ice(L)=0.000026 {I10} for 3154; E1,(E2) (1967Du05) 
E$poor-fit; level-energy difference=3149.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.00017 {I5} for 3533 multiplet: 3525+3529+3537 
$|a(K)exp=0.00022 {I7} for multiplet: 3525+3529+3537 consistent with E1,M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00025 {I5} for 3747+3753 suggests (M1,E2) for doublet 
$Ice(K)=0.000110 {I17} for 3747+3753. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1,E2,(E1) (1967Du05), but deduced |a(K)exp is too high to be consistent with any multipolarity 
$Ice(K)=0.000040 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1,E2 (1967Du05). But deduced |a(K)exp is too high to be consistent with any multipolarity 
$Ice(K)=0.000050 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1,E2,(E1) (1967Du05). But deduced |a(K)exp is too high to be consistent with any multipolarity 
$Ice(K)=0.000062 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
%I|g=26 {I13} (1996As05); the activity in the mass 165 fraction for a {+165}Tb |g of known absolute intensity was used to deduce the total separation efficiency and, from this and the production cross sections for {+165}Tb and {+166}Tb, the emission probability for the I(173|g) in the 166 mass fraction was calculated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$no uncertainty is given in 2019Zh49; evaluator assigns uncertainty based on uncertainties given to {+168}Dy |g transitions, also studied in 2019Zh49. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g unobserved. E(2+ to 0+)=81, 73, 77, 75 in {+162}Dy, {+164}Dy, {+166}Dy, {+168}Dy, respectively (2010So03), and projected shell model calculations (2010Zo01) predict E|?72 for {+170}Dy. Based on their detector efficiency and the expected large electron conversion coefficient, 2010So03 would not expect to have observed a 72-keV |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g from target-like fragment observed in |g spectrum gated by {+82}Kr beam-like fragments (the binary reaction partner of {+170}Dy) and in 777|g({+82}Kr)-|g coin spectrum (2010So03). Uncertainty unstated by authors. 
$Tentatively assigned as 4+ to 2+ g.s. band transition based on systematics for that E|g in lighter even-A Dy isotopes (2010So03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$deduced by compiler from transition intensity of 174.9-keV |g ray 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
$L-conversion electron line seen at 68 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced by compiler from level-energy difference 
TI$deduced by compiler from summed transition intensity of 155.6, 290.3 and 712.8 |g transitions 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
$Hindrance f{-|n} (|n=5)=247 {I15} (2016Wa19); |n=|DK-|l, where |l=multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a for 56.7. This E|g is too close to K-shell binding energy, thus it is difficult to obtain a reliable |a value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
CC$for 56.8 {I1}. Value for 56.8 {I3} is not calculated by bricc code due to E|g too close to K-shell binding energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Predicted to decay from the 315-ns state by 2001Ro15 and 1982No07 in ({+58}Ni,3p|g); E|g is from 2001Ro15 
E$from level energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Predicted to decay from the 2687.1, 315 ns state by 2001Ro15 and 1982No07; E|g is from 2001Ro15 who report the energy of the parent level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity from 9.6-s and 4-s isomers=76 {I9} (1989Fi01) out of which 7 {I3} is assigned to 4-s isomer 
M$|a(K)exp=0.57 {I7}, from summed x-ray and |g-ray intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity from 8.9-s and 4-s isomers=69 {I8} (1989Fi01) out of which 2 {I1} is assigned to 4-s isomer 
M$|a(K)exp(344|g+437|g)=0.14 {I3} consistent with M1 for both transitions. |a(K)exp is deduced from summed x-ray and |g-intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ poor fit. Level-energy difference=896.1. This |g energy was not included in the least-squares fitting procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$from assumed (by evaluator) intensity balance at 1684 level in {+151}Er |e decay, I(|g+ce)(106.6|g)/I|g(404|g)|?100/57 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$33~{I2} from |S(I(|g+ce)(in))=I(|g+ce)(100.1|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=2.5~{I4} and K/L=7.4~{I16} (1988Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ poor fit. Level-energy difference=896.1. This |g ray energy was not included in the least-squares fit procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.32~{I3}. Polarization data: N(1)/N(2)=0.85~{I20} gives |D|p=no. |d=-0.19~{I2} or -3.4~{I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Deduced from |g|g. 1997Ri02 report 512.1~{I3} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I6} deduced assuming I(511.7|g)=I(703.8|g) DCO=1.00 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Reported only by 1994An13. The transition is listed in the authors' table as connecting a 3915 level with the 2860 level; however, the energy difference does not agree with E|g, and no such level or transition is shown in the authors' level scheme. The energy agrees with placement from the 4235 level to the 3019 level, in which case one has I|g/I|g(704|g)=0.015~{I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E,RI$1994An13 report E|g=155.1~{I1} with I|g=8~{I3}, but placed from the 4235 level 
M$DCO=0.92~{I24} 


