# LEVEL

level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.017 {I4} 
E$weighted average of 10531 {I10} (1988Fu01) and 10538 {I10} (2017Ma28). 
L$from 1988Fu01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.103 {I12} 
E$weighted average of 10563 {I10} (1988Fu01) and 10578 {I10} (2017Ma28). 
L$from 1988Fu01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.102 {I48} 
E$weighted average of 10765 {I10} (1988Fu01) and 10763 {I10} (2017Ma28) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.018 {I13} 
E$weighted average of 10936 {I10} (1988Fu01) and 10933 {I10} (2017Ma28). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.020 {I5} 
E$weighted average of 11230 {I11} (1988Fu01) and 11225 {I10} (2017Ma28). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.082 {I8} 
E$weighted average of 12123 {I12} (1988Fu01) and 12120 {I10} (2017Ma28). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.043 {I22} 
E$weighted average of 12476 {I12} (1988Fu01) and 12480 {I10} (2017Ma28). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s{-M1}(0|')(mb/sr)=0.129 {I1} 
E$weighted average of 12658 {I12} (1988Fu01) and 12660 {I10} (2017Ma28). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from p|g(|q) in 1970Be39 
T$From DSAM in 1970Be39. 
$Deformation length |d{-2}=0.78 fm {I11} from |s=5.2 mb {I19} (2014Ri04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$0+ from observation of E0 e+/e- pair emission to g.s. (1970Be39); spin=0 also from p|g(|q) in 1970Bo03 
T$from p|g(t) in 1970Be39. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from p|g(t) in 1972Ta23. Originally attributed to the 5147 state by 1972Ta23 but reassigned by 1977Lo06 who obtained 1.25 ns 28 and 1.32 ns {I21} for the 4504 state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=3 from |g|g(|q) in 1972Ta23. 
T$from DSAM in 1972Ta23. 
CONF$(|n,p{-3/2}f{-7/2}){+-1}. 
$|s<3.2 mb (2014Ri04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
T$4.6 fs {I8} if E1 or 11.4 fs {I28} if E2 excitation. 
WIDTHG0$0.098 eV {I17} if E1 or 0.04 eV {I1} if E2 excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3,4,5
level_comment:
J$3,5 from |g(|q). Results are discrepant in the various experiments; see the Adopted Levels for discussion. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$1 from |g(|q). 1992Va06 note that 6791|g(|q) consistent only with J=1 but assume (2+) from (e,e') (1985Wi06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J,ISPIN$momentum transfer dependence favors an E1 excitation; small |G implies an isobaric analog resonance. 
$%EWSR(IVGDR)=81 {I12} 
$%EWSR(ISGMR)=46 {I6} 
$%EWSR(ISGQR)=46 {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$E2 resonance 
E$quoted uncertainty=+14-12. Centroid is 18.61|*10{+3} {I+13-34} with rms width=7.96 MeV {I+36-66} and %EWSR=83 {I+10-16} from energy moments (2011Lu07). Other: centroid=19.5|*10{+3} {I1} and %EWSR=78 {I+4-3} from 2020Ho01 
$%EWSR=0.65 {I+9-11} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$E1 resonance 
E$quoted value=37.28 MeV {I+71-198} 
$Quoted FWHM=14.95 {I+349-11} 
$%EWSR=160 {I+90-50} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$7.3 MeV dominant isovector state was not observed in the (|a,|a'|g). The authors state that |a particle in inelastic scattering is selective to the excitation of natural parity, and since the 7.3-MeV state was not observed, it could be a positive parity. However in a separate (pol |g,|g') experiment, the 7.3-MeV state was observed and indicated to have a negative parity. Hence the absence of the 7.3 MeV state in the (|a,|a'|g) experiment cannot be explained by its parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from Fig.1 of 2014De04 from (|a,|a'|g), but 1- is determined by 2014De04 from re-analysis of |g(|q) of 2002Ha13 in (|g,|g') and a |g asymmetry measurement with (|g,|g') by 2014De04. This discrepancy could indicate two separate levels with close energies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.0116 {I12}, 0.0126 {I13}, 0.0140 {I14}, 0.0155 {I16}; with different optical model parameter sets. Weighted average of those values gives 0.0131 {I12} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
$B(E3)|^=0.0075 {I8}, 0.0083 {I8}, 0.0085 {I9}, 0.0094 {I9}, 0.0105 {I11}; with different optical model parameter sets. Weighted average of those values gives 0.0087 {I8} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|d|n{+40,48}=1706.5 MHz {I8} (stat) {I35} (syst) 
$|d<r{+2}>{+40,47}=0.001 fm {+2} {I3} (stat) {I10} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
MOMM1 Preliminary; collinear LASER spectroscopy. -0.06 fm{+2}<|d<r{+2}>{+49-48}<+0.29 fm{+2} assumed in derivation of |m. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
$T{-1/2} |> 17.9 ps, T{-1/2} |< 0.3 ns 
T lower limit from RUL(E3); upper limit from delayed-coincidence measurement in (d,p|g). Other: T{-1/2}>693 fs from DSAM in (d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G (eV)=2.5 {I10} 
J |p=(+) from (n,x),(n,|g) discrepant 
$g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/|G (eV)=24 {I} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J |>5/2 from the R-matrix analysis of 1987Ca11 in (n,X),(n,|g). (1/2+,3/2+,5/2+) from log| {Ift}<5.9 from 3/2+ in |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
$693 fs<T{-1/2}<0.3 ns 
T lower limit from DSAM (1987Ta03); upper limit from delayed-coincidence measurement (1971Ca22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$from {+49}Ca Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2015Ru02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$Population |s=0.04 mb {I4} 
J$3358|g(|q) consistent with |DJ=2, Q thus supporting 7/2-, as proposed by 2012Mo11. Note that (9/2+) in {+49}Ca Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database is inconsistent with results in the present work and those in 2012Mo11 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$Population |s=0.04 mb {I4} (?) 
E,J$3861, (1/2-,3/2-) in {+49}Ca Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$Population |s=1.25 mb {I5} 
J$note that J|p=7/2+,9/2+ in {+49}Ca Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, but 660|g(|q) in 2016Ga07 is consistent with |DJ=1, dipole, thus supporting 9/2+, also assigned in 2012Mo11 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$possible member of the octupole multiplet (2016Ri02). (5/2+) in Adopted Levels of {+49}Ca in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$Level populated by removal of p{-3/2} neutron from {+50}Ca g.s. 
$Measured cross section=41.8 mb {I+52-59} (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S=2.1 {I3} (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S(normalized)=2.7 {I+3-4}(stat) {I5}(syst) (2017Cr03), using a quenching factor of 0.77 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$Level may be populated by removal of p{-1/2} neutron from {+50}Ca g.s. 
$Measured cross section=4.4 mb {I+8-5} (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S=0.28 {I+5-3} (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S(normalized)=0.37 {I+7-5}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2017Cr03), using a quenching factor of 0.74 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$Level populated by removal of f{-7/2} neutron from {+50}Ca g.s. 
$Measured cross section=38.9 mb {I+51-39} (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S=3.4 {I+4-3} (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S(normalized)=4.7 {I+6-5}(stat) {I9}(syst) (2017Cr03), using a quenching factor of 0.72 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$Measured cross section |< 0.8 mb (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S |< 0.07 (2017Cr03) 
$C{+2}S(normalized) |< 0.09 (2017Cr03), using a quenching factor of 0.71 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|d|n{+40,49}=1854.7 MHz {I10} (stat) {I43} (syst) 
$|d<r{+2}>{+40,49}=0.098 fm {+2} {I4} (stat) {I12} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$measured by 2017Ga25 from fit to the decay curves of 1519- and 1591-keV |g transitions, {+50}Ca beam produced in Ta(p,X),E=500 MeV at TRIUMF, and counted using GRIFFIN array of Ge detectors. Others: 13.9 s {I6} (1970Wa29, from decay curve for 257|g); 14 s {i3} (1968Ch11, from decay curve for all |g rays); 9 s {i2} (1964Sh14, decay curves for 72|g and 258|g) 
$Nuclear rms charge radius: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=3.517 fm {I7} (2013An02, evaluation) 
$Measured |dr{+2}({+40}Ca,{+50}Ca)=0.291 fm{+2} {I3}(stat) {I12}(syst) (2016Ga34, using COLLAPS at ISOLDE-CERN; see also 2017Ne04 review article on measurements at this facility). Previous measurement: 0.276 fm{+2} {I34} (1992Ve02, online collinear laser spectroscopy) 
$Measured isotope shift |d|n({+40}Ca,{+50}Ca)=1969.2 MHz {I9}(stat) {I47}(syst) (2016Ga34, using COLLAPS at ISOLDE-CERN). Previous measurement: 1951 MHz {I9}(stat) {I20}(syst) (1992Ve02, online collinear laser spectroscopy). 
$Measurement of isotope shift and rms radii: 1992Ve02, 2017Ne04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 1026.7|g to 0+; L(t,p)=2 from 0+ 
T$recoil-distance Doppler-shift method (2009Va06) in {+208}Pb({+48}Ca,X|g). Other: 68.6 ps {I55} from DSAM in ({+50}Ca,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=(2). L(t,p)=(4) and L(|a,2p)=(4) are also proposed but in the latter case L=2 does not seem ruled out in figure 32 of 1990Fi07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2+)
level_comment:
J$3531.7|g to 0+. Note that J|p=0+ is suggested in 1968Br01, 1967Gl08 and 1966Ve06 in theoretical analyses of (t,p) results for a 3519 level observed by 1967Bj06. It is possible two separate levels are populated near this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=(3). Inconsistent with L(|a,2p)=4, but L=3 comparison of |s(|q) data was not shown in figure 32 of 1990Fi07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$strong population in {+238}U({+48}Ca,X|g) suggests yrast 4+ level. L(t,p)=(3) for a 4517 {I15} group is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=2 
$L=0 suggested in 1968Br01, 1967Gl08 and 1966Ve06 in theoretical analyses, by J|p=(1,2+) for a 3531 level in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=21 
J$J|p=2+ excluded by 1983DaZZ. Note that L(t,p)=3 disagrees with L(|a,2p)=4. 1968Br01 state that L=4 or 5 are inconsistent with |s(|q) data of 1967Bj06 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$No oscillations observed in |s(|q) in contradiction to all other g.s. transitions reported by 1990Fi07 and DWBA predictions. 1990Fi07 suggest this is due to {+40}Ca(|a,2p) contamination. 
$(p{-3/2}){+2}{-0+}; N=380 {i230}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(p{-3/2}){+2}{-2+}; N=140 {i40}. 
L$|s(|q) plot in figure 32 of 1990Fi07 consistent with L=2 but does not seem to rule out L=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$1990Fi07 favor L=4 but |s(|q) plot in figure 32 of 1990Fi07 does not seem to rule out L=2 
$(p{-3/2},f{-5/2}){-4+}; N=90 {i35}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$recoil-distance Doppler-shift method (2009Va06) with gate on total kinetic energy gating loss (TKEL). Other: a preliminary value of 70.7 ps {I28} from 2009Me23 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSA (2014Ri04) 
$|s=3.4 mb {I11} 
$From measured cross sections, deformation length |d{-2}=0.57 fm {I9} (2014Ri04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|d|n{+40,50}=1969.2 MHz {I9} (stat) {I47} (syst) 
$|d<r{+2}>{+40,50}=0.291 fm {+2} {I3} (stat) {I13} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$Spin from hyperfine structure measurement (2015Ru02); parity from shell-model systematics 
T from |g multiscaling in 1980Hu14, 1981HuZT 
MOMM1 From collinear laser spectroscopy (CFBLS),{+43}Ca standard (2015Ru02) 
MOME2 From collinear laser spectroscopy (CFBLS),{+43}Ca standard (2015Ru02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$From shell-model predictions and systematics of odd-odd Ca isotopic chain. Configuration=|np{-3/2}{+4}~#|nf{-7/2}{+-1} (2008Fo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_comment:
J$spin from hyperfine structure measurement (2015Ru02); parity from shell-model systematics 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2015Ru02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|s{--1n}{+exp} = 30.3 mb {I42} using {Ir}{-0} = 1.35 fm {I10}, knockout from {Ip}{-3/2} in 2022En01. 
J$from the neutron knockout orbital and strong population consistent with the ({Ip}{-3/2}){+3} configuration in 2022En01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
$|s{--1n}{+exp} = 0.6 mb {I3} using {Ir}{-0} = 1.27 fm (taken as a starting point in WS one-body potential), knockout from {Ip}{-1/2} in 2022En01. 
J$from the neutron knockout orbital in 2022En01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$|s{--1n}{+exp} = 22.3 mb {I24} using {Ir}{-0} = 1.21 fm {I5}, knockout from {If}{-7/2} in 2022En01. 
J$from the neutron knockout orbital and strong population consistent with the ({If}{-7/2}){+-1} ({Ip}{-3/2}){+4} configuration in 2022En01. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
$|d|n{+40,51}=2102.6 MHz {I9} (stat) {I51} (syst) 
$|d<r{+2}>{+40,51}=0.392 fm {+2} {I3} (stat) {I13} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+52}Ca,{+48}Ca)=0.530 fm{+2} {I9}(stat) {I43}(syst), |d|n({+52}Ca,{+48}Ca)=510.5 MHz {I27}(stat) {I55}(syst) from ROC spectrum using atom signal; 
$|d<r{+2}>({+52}Ca,{+48}Ca)=0.557 fm{+2} {I9}(stat) {I44}(syst), |d|n({+52}Ca,{+48}Ca)=502.8 MHz {I28}(stat) {I55}(syst) from ROC spectrum using ion signal 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|d|n{+40,52}=2219.2 MHz {I14} (stat) {I56} (syst) 
$|d<r{+2}>{+40,52}=0.531 fm {+2} {I5} (stat) {I15} (syst) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$1983La23 stated that %|b{+-}n value for {+53}Ca should be considered as a lower limit since %|b{+-}2n decay of {+53}K was neglected. But from 2006Pe16, measured %|b{+-}2n|?10 {I5} for {+53}K decay. This value implies that %|b{+-}n=40 {I10} from 1983La23 is reasonable within the quoted uncertainty 
T$from (fragment)|b(2109|g) correlated decay curve (2010Cr02). Others: 230 ms {I60} (2008Ma01, (fragment)|b correlated decay curve), 90 ms {I15} (1983La23 from {+53}K -> {+53}Ca |b decay curve). Half-lives are very different in the three studies. Value from 2010Cr02 is adopted here due to (implants)|b|g correlated decay curves, with the caveat that the lower measured half-lives in 2008Ma01 and 1983La23 correspond to the ground state activity and not a low-lying isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$S(n)({+53}Ca)+x, where x<13090 {I127} from Q(|b{+-})({+53}K)=17090 {I120} and S(n)({+53}Ca)=3190 {I40} (2021Wa16)  


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$S(2n)({+53}Ca)+y, where x<7890 {I127} from Q(|b{+-})({+53}K)=17090 {I120} and S(2n)({+53}Ca)=9200 {I40} (2021Wa16)  


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=2.2 {I4} 
$Exclusive |s=15.9 mb {I17} 
$Inclusive |s=36.0 mb {I12} 
$C{+2}S=2.2 {I2}(stat) {I3}(theory) 
$Configuration=|np{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=0.23 {I8} 
$Exclusive |s=1.0 mb {I3} 
$C{+2}S=0.23 {I7}(stat) {I3}(theory) 
$Configuration=|nf{-5/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=3.1 {I5} 
$Exclusive |s=19.1 mb {I12} 
$C{+2}S=3.1 {I2}(stat) {I5}(theory) 
$Configuration=|np{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
$Exclusive |s=15.9 mb {I17} 
$Inclusive |s=36.0 mb {I12} 
$C{+2}S=2.2 {I2}(stat) {I3}(theory) 
$Configuration=|np{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ From fitting the decay curve of ({+54}Ca)|b(247|g) correlated events (2010Cr02). Earlier measurement from the same laboratory: 86 ms {I7} (2008Ma01) agrees within one |s 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: 0.052 mb {I28}. 
$E{-n}=0.102 MeV {I21} to {+53}Ca ground state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: 0.54 mb {I14}. 
$E{-n}=0.546 MeV {I58} to {+53}Ca ground state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: 0.15 mb {I30}. 
$E{-n}=0.1013 MeV {I54} to {+53}Ca 1738-keV state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: 1.22 mb {I16}. 
$E{-n}=0.583 MeV {I13} to {+53}Ca 1738-keV state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: 0.12 mb {I34}. 
$E{-n}=0.385 MeV {I13} to {+53}Ca 2220-keV state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: 1.49 mb {I19}. 
$E{-n}=0.672 MeV {I21} to {+53}Ca 2220-keV state; E{-n}=1.224 MeV {I74} to {+53}Ca 1738-keV state; E{-n}=2.92 MeV {I12} to {+53}Ca ground state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4,5-)
level_comment:
${+55}Sc(p,2p){+53}Ca+n cross-section: >1.01 mb. 
$E{-n}=1.454 MeV {I33} to {+53}Ca 2220-keV state; E{-n}=1.955 MeV {I45} to {+53}Ca 1738-keV state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=19.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=0, %|b{+-}2n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=19.9 ms, %|b{+-}n=2.06, 2.21; %|b{+-}2n=0.16, 0.29 (2021Mi17). Theoretical %|b{+-}n=4 (2008Ma01) 
T$from |b timing measurement (2008Ma01, 52 |b-correlated events out of a total of 256 implantations of {+55}Ca) 
J$from shell-model predictions (2008Ma01). Others: 5/2- (syst, 2021Ko07), 1/2 (theory, 2019Mo01) 
$Production cross section=2 nb (1997Be70) corresponding to six counts assigned to {+55}Ca in {+9}Be({+76}Ge,X) reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$from E|g 
T$mean lifetime |t=1130 ps {I+520-330}, estimated from peak-shape analysis in {+1}H({+56}Ca,np|g) (2022Ko06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
$Measured inclusive |s=27.9 mb {I23} (2022Ko06). 
$Measured exclusive |s=8.3 mb {I+67-36} (2022Ko06). 
$Spectroscopic factor=2.0 {I+16-9} (2022Ko06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$Measured exclusive |s=19.6 mb {I+67-37} (2022Ko06) 
E$from E|g 
T$mean lifetime |t=1130 ps {I+520-330}, estimated from peak-shape analysis in {+1}H({+56}Ca,np|g) (2022Ko06) 
$Spectroscopic factor=1.31 {I42} (2022Ko06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from analysis of the Doppler corrected |g ray spectrum (2022Ko06). 
$|s=19.6 mb {I+67-37} 
S$reported as 3.0 {I+10-6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=24.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=8, %|b{+-}2n=0, %|b{+-}3n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=14.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=3.1, 2.8; %|b{+-}2n=0.17, 0.18; %|b{+-}3n=0 (2021Mi17); two values for different fission barriers. 
T$from (implants)|b{+-} correlated decay curves (2008Ma01) using 18 |b correlated events out of a total of 99 implantations of {+56}Ca 
$Production cross section=1 nb (1997Be70) corresponding to three counts assigned to {+56}Ca in {+9}Be({+76}Ge,X) reaction 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
$Measured partial cross section for the 1456,(2+) level=0.43 mb {I4} (2023Ch26) 
E$from E|g 
J$from measured parallel momentum distributions, systematics of first 2+ energies in even-even Ca nuclei, and shell-model calculations (2023Ch26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Measured partial cross section for the g.s.=0.80 mb {I6}. 
$Measured inclusive cross section for {+56}Ca=1.23 mb {I5}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
$Measured partial cross section for the 1456,(2+) level=0.43 mb {I4}. 
J$from measured parallel momentum distributions, systematics of first 2+ energies in even-even Ca nuclei, and shell-model calculations (2023Ch26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n=22, %|b{+-}2n=1.8 (calculated, 1997Mo25) 
$ Measured cross section=47 fb {I+34-23} (e-mail reply of Nov 11, 2009 from O. Tarasov, first author of 2009Ta24). 
E$ fragment observed by 2009Ta24 (also 2009Ta05) is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+57}Ca. 
J$ 5/2- proposed from systematics (2003Au02), 3/2- from calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$ time-of-flight=620-650 ns (e-mail reply of Sept 23, 2009 from O. Tarasov). Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by systematics value of 5 ms (2003Au02) and calculated value of 7.7 ms (1997Mo25) 
$Calculated (1997Mo25) populations of daughter nuclides: 76% for {+57}Sc, 22% for {+56}Sc through |b{+-}n decay and 1.8% for {+55}Sc through |b{+-}2n decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$While no decay mode has been experimentally observed, evaluator assigns %|b{+-}=100 by inference, as |b{+-} is the only decay mode energetically possible, followed by |b-delayed neutron emission decay that are possible for respective positive Q values listed above. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=7.9 ms, %|b{+-}n=15, %|b{+-}2n=1, %|b{+-}3n=0, %|b{+-}4n=0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=8.27 ms, %|b{+-}n=5.4, 6.1; %|b{+-}2n=0.98; %|b{+-}3n=0.023, 0.016; %|b{+-}4n=0.0 (2021Mi17), two values for different fission barriers. 
T$no experimental value has been reported. A lower limit of 620 ns is implied from time of flight through the A1900 separator. Assuming a systematic decreasing trend of half-lives in neutron-rich nuclei, as neutron number increases, estimated T{-1/2}<10 ms from the known half-lives of 90 ms for {+54}Ca, 22 ms for {+55}Ca, and 11 ms for {+56}Ca. 2021Ko07 suggested 4 ms from systematic trend. 
$Production cross section=10 fb {i+12-54} (from e-mail reply of Nov 11, 2009 from the first author of 2009Ta24, see also Fig. 8 for cross sections in 2009Ta24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$systematics of first 2+ energies in even-even Ca nuclei, and shell-model predictions (2023Ch26). 
$Measured partial cross section for the 1115,(2+) level=0.47 mb {I19}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Measured partial cross section for the g.s.=0.66 mb {I24}. 
$Measured inclusive cross section for {+58}Ca=1.14 mb {I15}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$from 2023Ch26, based on shell-model predictions. 
$Measured partial cross section for the 1115,(2+) level=0.47 mb {I19}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed neutron decays, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Measured production cross section=8|*10{+-16} b {I3} (2018Ta17) from a total of nine events assigned to {+59}Ca, as given in the text (2018Ta17). Table I in 2018Ta17 has six events for tuned setting of the spectrometer for {+60}Ca, and one event for setting on {+50}S. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=4.8 ms, %|b{+-}n=49, %|b{+-}2n=6, %|b{+-}3n=0, %|b{+-}4n=0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=6.4 ms, %|b{+-}n=13.7; %|b{+-}2n=3.8, 3.9; %|b{+-}3n=0.22, 0.19; %|b{+-}4n=0.002, 0.001 (2021Mi17); two values for different fission barriers. 
$The observed events are assumed to correspond to the {+59}Ca g.s. 
T$half-life of the {+59}Ca activity has not been measured. It is expected to be greater than the time-of-flight through the beam transport system, which may be about 500 ns. From systematics of half-lives of neighboring P isotopes, the half-life is expected to be <10 ms from 11 ms for {+56}Ca, 22 ms for {+55}Ca, 107 ms for {+54}Ca, and 461 ms for {+53}Ca, assuming a decreasing trend of half-life as neutron number increases in neutron-rich nuclei. From systematics, T{-1/2}=5 ms in 2021Ko07. 
J$1/2 (2019Mo01, theory); 5/2- (syst, 2021Ko07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed neutron decays, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Measured cross section=2.1|*10{+-16} b {I15} (2018Ta17) from a total of two events assigned to {+60}Ca, with tuned setting of the spectrometer for {+60}Ca. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=4.3 ms, %|b{+-}n=46, %|b{+-}2n=3, %|b{+-}3n=0, %|b{+-}4n=0, %|b{+-}5n=0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=5.3 ms, %|b{+-}n=16.8, 17.6; %|b{+-}2n=2.9, 2.7; %|b{+-}3n=0.62, 0.69; %|b{+-}4n=0.001, %|b{+-}5n=0.0 (2021Mi17); two values for different fission barriers. 
$The observed events are assumed to correspond to the {+60}calc g.s. 
T$half-life of the {+60}Ca activity has not been measured. It is expected to be greater than the time-of-flight through the beam transport system, which may be about 500 ns. From systematics of half-lives of neighboring P isotopes, the half-life is expected to be <10 ms from 11 ms for {+56}Ca, 22 ms for {+55}Ca, 107 ms for {+54}Ca, and 461 ms for {+53}Ca, assuming a decreasing trend of half-life as neutron number increases in neutron-rich nuclei. From systematics, T{-1/2}=2 ms in 2021Ko07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$Total decay energy E{-T}=2690 {I410} to encompasses the results from a single-peak fit (E{-T}=3000 {I50}) and a two-peak fit (E{-T}=2370 {I130} and 3240 {I80}) to the measured decay-energy spectra. The authors state that a fit with two low-lying states is expected, but the amount of data and the resolution are insufficient to make definitive statements. 
$Mass excess=3500 keV {I410}, deduced by 2024Dr01 from their measured total decay energy and mass of {+36}Ca measured by 2021Su04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
$Total decay energy E{-T}=1191 {I14} 
$Mass excess=-4656 keV {I14}, deduced by 2024Dr01 from their measured total decay energy and mass of {+37}Ca in 2021Wa16 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from systematics (1988Wo07,1992Mo15,2017Au03) 
T$from 1994Bl10 where {+39}Sc isotope was not seen in {+9}Be({+58}Ni,X) at 650 MeV/nucleon with tof=300 ns. Other: <130 ns (1989LiZF) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
E$possible IAS from 2001Gi01, deduced from measured delayed-proton energy of 4880 {I40} (lab system) by suggesting that this proton group corresponds to the |b-delayed two-proton decay of {+39}Ti to the ground state in {+37}K via the IAS in {+39}Sc. However, 2007Do17 consider the placement of this proton group as questionable and conclude that a firm assignment of this proton group needs better and higher statistics data. Other: 8820 {I40} (1992Mo15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.7 to 5-, log| {Ift}=4.8 to 3- (see {+40}Sc |e decay), 
T$weighted average of 179 ms {I2} (1962Sc08), 186 ms {I4} (1966An01), 182.7 ms {I8} (1968Ar03), and 183 ms {I3} (1972Mo08). 
$%|e|a, %|ep: from 1982Ho09. 
$dominant configuration=(|pf{-7/2},|nd{-3/2}{+-1}) (1986Ch19) in (p,n) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t) 
J$from DWIA analysis of |s(|q) in (p,n) for a complex structure and DWBA analysis of |s(|q) in ({+3}He,t). In higher-energy ({+3}He,t) experiments of 1984Ta11, a 1+ level at 2370 is proposed from |s(|q) data with the speculation that this state may be the analog of T=1 {I10310}, 1+ state or T=1 {I9400}, 0+ state in {+40}Ca 
$dominant configuration=(|pf{-7/2},|ns{-1/2}{+-1}) (1986Ch19) in (p,n) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2-)
level_comment:
E,J$from DWIA analysis of |s(|q) for a complex structure in (p,n). E=3856 {I42} from {+40}Ti |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
J$from DWIA analysis of |s(|q) for a complex structure in (p,n) 
$dominant configuration=(|pf{-7/2},|nd{-5/2}{+-1}) (1983An06, 1986Ch19) in (p,n) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
E$analog of the 4-, T=1 state at E=7.7 MeV in {+40}Ca (1986Ch19) 
$dominant configuration=(|pf{-7/2},|nd{-3/2}{+-1}) (1986Ch19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
E,J,L$for a complex between 5 and 10 MeV. E(level) is taken as the median value of the range. 
$dominant configuration=(|pf{-7/2},|nd{-5/2}{+-1}) (1983An06, 1986Ch19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1-,2-)
level_comment:
E,J,L$for a giant resonance between 6 and 18 MeV. E(level) is taken as the median value of the range. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-&2-)
level_comment:
$|s(RELATIVE)=1.2 
E$ 1667 {I4} (1971Sc02), 1680 (1971Lo16), 1671.6 {I19} (2000Ha06) 
E$possibly a triplet (1971Sc02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(RELATIVE)=6.1 
E$ 2366 4 (1971Sc02), 2378 (1971Lo16), 2376 5 (2000Ha06) 
E,J$a peak at 2370 is reported by 1982Ta05. Possible J|p=1+ from small L-transfer suggested by |s(|q) data of 1984Ta11 who speculate that this state may be the analog of T=1 {I10310}, 1+ state or T=1 {I9400}, 0+ state in {+40}Ca. |s(|q) data of 1971Lo16 suggests 4- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>{+40,45}=-0.226 fm{+2} {I22} (stat) {I175} (syst) (2023Ko19) 
$|d|n{+}{+40,45}=-1594 MHz {I8} (2023Ko19) 
$R{-ch}=3.514 fm {I3} (stat) {I25} (syst) (2023Ko19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
MOMM1$reported as +5.57 {I4} (stat) {I2} (syst) with uncertainty added in quadrature by compiler. Value is relative to |m({+45}Sc)=+4.75631 {I48}. 
MOME2$reported as +0.42 {I38} (stat) {I28} (syst) Value is relative to Q({+45}Sc)=-0.236 {I2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
MOMM1$|b-NMR method. See also 1990Mi17, 1990Mi18. Other: 5.425 {I4} (2013Is07, |b-NMR) 
MOME2$|b-NMR method. See also 2001Mi40. Earlier results of same group 0.166 {I8} (1993Mi09) and 0.120 {I6} (1990Mi19). 
T$from 1973Al11. Others: 591 ms {I5} (1973Ta04), 596 ms {I6} (1965Yo02), 550 ms {I30} (1962Cr04), 870 ms {I50} (1960Wa04), 870 ms {I30} (1941El03). Also: 1960Ja12, 1952Ma55. 
J$L(d,n)=L({+3}He,d)=L(|a,t)=3 and (pol {+3}He,d); log {Ift}=3.45 to 7/2- mirror nuclide. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$L(d,n)=L({+3}He,d)=L(|a,t)=1; |g to 7/2- 
$Radiative T{-1/2}=0.36 ps 11 from |G{-|g}=0.0013 eV {I4} in (p,|g). Other: 0.30 ps from |G{-|g}=0.02 eVb, also in (p,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$5/2 or 9/2 from |g(|q) in (p,|g), 872|g to 3/2- rules out J=9/2. D+Q for 2588|g to 7/2- with large value of |d favors no change in parity. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$log {Ift}=5.1 from 3/2+ parent, comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of 3526 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2,7/2-)
level_comment:
J$1962|g to 3/2- and 3678|g to 7/2-. If corresponds to level observed in {+41}Ti |e decay, 5/2+ would be favored from log {Ift}=5.6 from 3/2+ parent 
E$could also correspond to 3690 {I130} level observed in {+41}Ti |e decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) and RUL in (p,|g); supported by D+Q 4023|g to 7/2- with large |d value which favors |D|p=no. However, L({+3}He,d)=(3,4) suggests 5/2-,7/2+ for a 4030 {I20} group 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) and RUL in (p,|g), supported by D+Q 4030|g to 7/2- with large |d value which favors |D|p=no. See also comment for 4022.8 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$log {Ift}=4.2 from 3/2+ parent; comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of 4815 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of 5480 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=5.0 from 3/2+ parent; comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of 5652 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of of 5717 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=4.7 from 3/2+ parent; comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of 5756 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 
E$possibly the same as the 5867-kev level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=4.8 from 3/2+ parent; comparison to > transition strengths for isospin analog state of 5890 keV in {+41}Ca (2004Fu28,2014Ka01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
E$this level may correspond to 6643 and/or 6700 levels observed in (p,p),(p,p'|g):Res 
J$from log {Ift}=4.7 from 3/2+ parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=5.3 from 3/2+ parent 
E$this level may correspond to 7177, 7201 and/or 7206 levels in (p,p),(p,p'|g):Res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=5.4 from 3/2+ parent 
E$this level may correspond to the 7347 and/or 7382 levels in (p,p),(p,p'|g):Res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=5.4 from 3/2+ parent 
E$this level may correspond to 7572 and/or 7650 levels in (p,p),(p,p'|g):Res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$from log {Ift}=5.3 from 3/2+ parent 
E$7900 {I50} in {+41}Ti |e decay could correspond to 7894 and/or 7903 levels in (p,p),(p,p'|g):Res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=647.28 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.0018 
E$from E|g and E(p) (1987Zi02) 
$Radiative T{-1/2}=0.36 ps {I11} from |G{-|g}=0.0013 eV {I4} (1965Yo03). Other: 0.30 ps from |G{-|g}=0.02 eV-b (1961Bu08) 
$C{+2}S=1.0 {I3} relative to 1.0 for g.s. (1983Te02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1540.87 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.020 {I3} 
J$from |g(|q) and RUL (1968Yo04). J=9/2 also possible from |g(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1621.39 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.018 {I2} 
J$from |g(|q) and RUL (1968Yo04). J=3/2,9/2 also possible from |g(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1842.66 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.384 {I34} 
J$7/2 from |g(|q) in 1977Ko10; E1(+M2) 2282|g to 7/2- from |g(lin pol) gives |p=+. 
S$from 2014Sc05 measured both absolute and relative to the {+40}Ca(|a,|g) reaction. Others: 0.28 {I4} (2012Ro13), 0.28 {I5} (1979Pa16), 0.28 {I4} (1977Ko10), 0.39 {I9} (1968Yo04), 0.26 {I4} (1966En04), 0.30 {I+30-16} (1961Bu08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1934.5 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.062 {I8} 
J$from |g(|q) and RUL (1968Yo04). J=9/2 also possible from |g(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2385.0 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.012 {I4} 
J$from 1983Te02 
S$other: 0.006 {I4} (1983Te02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2677.4 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.30 {I4} 
J$from |g(|q) and RUL (1987Zi02). 
J$other: 7/2- favored by RUL in 1968Yo04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3965 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.38 
L$3965 corresponds to 4947+4949 levels 
J$from |g(|q) and RUL in 1968Yo04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4051.2 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=2.40 {I4} 
L,S$from 1977Ko10. Other: E(p)=4054 (1968Yo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4974 
$(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=0.50 {I9} 
L,S$from 1976Fo01. 
J$3/2+ in the Adopted Levels 
$T=3/2 (1976Fo01). 
L$4974 {I4} (1976Fo01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p} (keV)=73 keV {I10} 
E$other: 3470 {I20} (1975Vi05) 
L$from 1975Vi05. Other: (0,1) in 1969Ge05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$expected contributions from the 3769-keV (L=1) and 3779-keV (L=2) levels have been taken account in the determination of S. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$may contain contribution from six known levels near this energy. Primary contributions are expected to be from the 5416-keV (L=2) and 5371-keV (L=2) levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$configuration=1g9/2 (1991Gu02) for slice of excitation energy centered at 8640-keV with width of 480 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$configuration=1g9/2 (1991Gu02) for slice of excitation energy centered at 9600-keV with width of 520 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=986 {I5} 
S$weighted average of 985 {I7} (1998Bh12), 976 {I30} (1998Li46), 986 {I5} (1997Ho12), 1000 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1542 {I2} 
S$weighted average of 1538 {I7} (1998Bh12), 1540 {I20} (1998Li46), 1542 {I2} (1997Ho12), 1546 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2272 {I4} 
S$weighted average of 2278 {I7} (1998Bh12), 2270 {I25} (1998Li46), 2270 {I4} (1997Ho12), 2271 {I10} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2414 {I3} 
S$weighted average of 2412 {I8} (1998Bh12), 2440 {I40} (1998Li46), 2414 {I3} (1997Ho12), 2409 {I20} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2655 {I12} 
S$weighted average of 2658 {I12} (1998Bh12), 2654 {I40} (1998Li46), 2650 {I12} (1997Ho12), 2662 {I20} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2803 {I12} 
S$weighted average of 2800 {I12} (1998Bh12), 2817 {I46} (1998Li46), 2796 {I14} (1997Ho12), 2814 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3084 {I5} 
S$weighted average of 3087 {I7} (1998Bh12), 3095 {I10} (1998Li46), 3080 {I5} (1997Ho12), 3077 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3145 {I12} 
S$weighted average of 3158 {I18} (1998Bh12), 3139 {I12} (1997Ho12), 3148 {I20} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3337 {I13} 
S$weighted average of 3352 {I15} (1998Bh12), 3295 {I40} (1998Li46), 3330 {I13} (1997Ho12), 3339 {I30} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3483 {I12} 
S$weighted average of 3488 {I16} (1998Bh12), 3452 {I70} (1998Li46), 3480 {I12} (1997Ho12), 3487 {I20} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3600 {I6} 
S$weighted average of 3604 {I11} (1998Bh12), 3569 {I40} (1998Li46), 3598 {I6} (1997Ho12), 3605 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3691 {I5} 
S$weighted average of 3691 {I10} (1998Bh12), 3647 {I50} (1998Li46), 3691 {I5} (1997Ho12), 3690 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3749 {I5} 
S$weighted average of 3751 {I8} (1998Bh12), 3749 {I18} (1998Li46), 3749 {I5} (1997Ho12), 3749 {I10} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3825 {I9} 
S$weighted average of 3803 {I18} (1998Bh12), 3857 {I40} (1998Li46), 3837 {I9} (1997Ho12), 3836 {I25} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=3884 {I11} 
S$weighted average of 3870 {I15} (1998Bh12), 3888 {I11} (1997Ho12), 3904 {I25} (1974Se11). Other: 4025 {I40} (1998Li46). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4188 {I6} 
S$weighted average of 4185 {I8} (1998Bh12), 4192 {I20} (1998Li46), 4189 {I6} (1997Ho12), 4187 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4385 {I8} 
S$weighted average of 4397 {I11} (1998Bh12), 4376 {I40} (1998Li46), 4381 {I8} (1997Ho12), 4379 {I15} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4570 {I8} 
S$weighted average of 4586 {I15} (1998Bh12), 4567 {I8} (1997Ho12), 4564 {I20} (1974Se11). Other: 4486 {I40} (1998Li46). Feeding to the 3904, 2+ in {+40}Ca gives E(p)=750 {I11}, weighted average of 698 {I45} (1998Bh12), 754 {I12} (1997Ho12), 744 {I60} (1998Li46). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4638 {I5} 
S$weighted average of 4634 {I8} (1998Bh12), 4625 {I66} (1998Li46), 4639 {I5} (1997Ho12), 4638 {I10} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4735 {I4} 
S$weighted average of 4736 {I8} (1998Bh12), 4727 {I16} (1998Li46), 4736 {I5} (1997Ho12), 4734 {I4} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4877 {I20} 
S$weighted average of 4877 {I36} (1998Bh12), 4883 {I60} (1998Li46), 4876 {I20} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=4946 {I14} 
S$weighted average of 4949 {I14} (1998Bh12), 4976 {I40} (1998Li46), 4925 {I25} (1974Se11). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5093 {I40} 
E$6305 {I40} from E(p)=5093 {I40} to {+40}Ca g.s. and 6293 {I70} from E(p)=1272 {I70} to 3904, 2+ {+40}Ca (1998Li46). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=1981 {I12} 
S$weighted average of 1983 {I25} (1974Se11) and 1981 {I12} (1997Ho12) 
E$this level may be the same as the 6435-keV level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5718 {I15} 
E$also possibly 6936 {I30} (1974Se11) from E(p)=2063 {I30} to 3737 state in {+40}Ca. 
S$weighted average of 5736 {I40} (1998Li46) and 5715 {I15} (1985Zh05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5947 {I20} 
E$also possibly 7153 {I42} from E(p)=2111 {I42} (1998Li46) 
S$weighted average of 5889 {I94} (1998Li46) and 5950 {I20} (1985Zh05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2440 
T$from 1972Kl03. Other: 60 keV {I6} for E(p)(lab)=2446 keV {I5} (1974Wi09), 80 keV {I20} for E(p)(lab)=2455 keV {I5} (1975Ko13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2445 
T$from 1972Kl03. Other: 60 keV {I6} for E(p)(lab)=2446 keV {I5} (1974Wi09), 80 keV {I20} for E(p)(lab)=2455 keV {I5} (1975Ko13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=2757 
J$from 1975Ko13, 1974Wi09. Other: 1/2- in 1970Lo18, 1972Kl03 
T$other: 0.4 keV {I1} (1975Ko13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5024 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.84 {I7}, A{-4}(1)=-0.10 {I7}, L(1)=1, J(1)=3/2, |G(1)=0.30 keV (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5087 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.65 {I3}, A{-4}(1)=-0.06 {I4}, L(1)=1, J(1)=3/2, |G(1)=0.72 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5247 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.80 {I8}, A{-4}(1)=-0.11 {I11}, L(1)=1, J(1)=3/2, |G(1)=0.12 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5409 
$A{-2}(1)=-0.06 {I4}, A{-4}(1)=+0.82 {I4}, L(1)=2, J(1)=5/2, |G(1)=1.7 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.10 {I5}, A{-4}(3)=-0.07 {I7}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=0.86 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5448 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}(2)=+0.23 {I5}, L(2)=1, J(2)=3/2, |G(2)=7.8 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5463 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}(1)=+0.65 {I4}, L(1)=2, J(1)=5/2, |G(1)=0.185 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.12 {I3}, A{-4}(1)=+0.02 {I5}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=0.141 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5485 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.27 {I7}, A{-4}(1)=+0.28 {I7}, L(2)=0+2, J(2)=1/2+(5/2), |G(2)=0.007+0.149 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.36 {I4}, A{-4}(3)=+0.05 {I5}, L(3)=1, |G(3)=0.262 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5565 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.70 {I6}, A{-4}(1)=+0.75 {I7}, L(1)=2, J(1)=5/2, |G(1)=0.206 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.08 {I5}, A{-4}(3)=+0.11 {I6}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=0.308 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5585 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.03 {I4}, A{-4}(3)=-0.05 {I6}, L(2)=1, J(2)=1/2, |G(2)=1.27 (1970Ma16). Other: |G(2)=0.1 (1974MiYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5638 
$E(p): average from 1970Ma16 and 1974MiYW 
$Angular distribution asymmetric, A{-1}=0.85 {I7}, implying interference of resonances having the same spin (1/2) and opposite parity (1970Ma16) 
$L(1)=1, J(1)=1/2, |G(1)=22 (1974MiYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5642 
$E(p): average from 1970Ma16 and 1974MiYW 
$Angular distribution asymmetric, A{-1}=0.90 {I9}, implying interference of resonances having the same spin (1/2) and opposite parity (1970Ma16) 
$L(1)=0, J(1)=1/2, |G(1)=22 (1974MiYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5664 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.27 {I10}, A{-4}(1)=+0.00 {I10}, L(1)=0, J(1)=1/2 (1970Ma16) 
$Angular distribution asymmetric, A{-1}=0.90 {I7}, implying interference of resonances having the same spin (1/2) and opposite parity (1970Ma16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5676 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.17 {I8}, A{-4}(1)=+0.74 {I12}, L(1)=2, J(1)=5/2 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.06 {I5}, A{-4}(3)=-0.05 {I7}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=0.193 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5706 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.55 {I4}, A{-4}(2)=-0.15 {I6} (1970Ma16), L(2)=1, |G(2)=0.03 (1974MiYW). Other: J(2)=1/2, |G(2)=3.57 (1970Ma16). 
$L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=0.09 (1970Ma16) 
$L(4)=1, |G(4)=0.48 (1970Ma16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5747 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.38 {I23}, A{-4}(1)=-0.06 {I32}, L(1)=1, J(1)=3/2, |G(1)=0.42 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.01 {I5}, A{-4}(3)=-0.10 {I6}, L(3)=1, J(3)=(1/2), |G(3)=2.6 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5756 
$A{-2}(1)=+1.41 {I5}, A{-4}(1)=+0.92 {I5}, L(1)=2, J(1)=5/2, |G(1)=1.57 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.04 {I5}, A{-4}(2)=+0.07 {I8}, L(2)=1, J(2)=1/2, |G(2)=1.23 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.00 {I4}, A{-4}(3)=+0.02 {I6}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=2.76 (1970Ma16). 
J$other: 5/2(-) (1974MiYW), with L(1)=(3), L(2)=(0), L(3)=(1) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5798 
J$from 1970Ma16. Other: (1/2+) in 1974MiYW 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.03 {I3}, A{-4}(2)=+0.05 {I4}, L(2)=1, J(2)=1/2, |G(2)=0.243 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}(3)=+0.05 {I6}, L(3)=0, |G(3)=0.121 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5841 
$A{-2}(1)=+0.86 {I6}, A{-4}(1)=-0.22 {I7} (1970Ma16) 
$A{-2}(3)=-0.87 {I4}, A{-4}(3)=+0.12 {I6}, L(3)=1, |G(3)=0.240 (1970Ma16). 
J$other: 5/2-,7/2-, with no inelastic cross section. 
$SIGMA=28.6 MB TO 3350, 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5883 
$A{-2}(1)=+1.07 {I6}, A{-4}(1)=+0.76 {I9} , L(1)=2, J(1)=5/2, |G(1)=0.030 (1970Ma16) 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.10 {I5}, A{-4}(2)=-0.05 {I7} ,L(2)=1, |G(2)=0.078 (1970Ma16) 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.07 {I5}, A{-4}(3)=-0.02 {I7}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=0.077 (1970Ma16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5901 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.13 {I6}, A{-4}(2)=0.00 {I8}, L(2)=0, J(2)=1/2, |G(2)=1.36 (1970Ma16) 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.17 {I5}, A{-4}(3)=+0.07 {I7}, L(3)=1, |G(3)=4.25 (1970Ma16) 
$Other: |G(2)=0.2, |G(3)=1.5 (1974MiYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5917 
$A{-2}(3)=-0.51 {I1}, A{-4}(3)=+0.15 {I3}, L(3)=1, J(3)=3/2, |G(3)=0.55 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5941 
$L(1)=4, |G(1)=(0.02) (1974MiYW) 
$L(2)=1, |G(2)=(0.14) (1974MiYW) 
$L(3)=2, |G(3)=(0.26) (1974MiYW) 
$L(4)=1, |G(4)=(0.012) (1974MiYW) 
$Other: A{-2}(2)=0.10 {I2}, A{-4}(2)=0.05 {I5} and A{-2}(3)=+0.95 {I1}, A{-4}(3)=+0.48 {I2}, L(3)=2, J(3)=5/2, |G(3)=0.79, |G(4)=0.046 (1970Ma16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=5985 
L$doublet (1970Wh06) 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.08 {I6}, A{-4}(2)=+0.05 {I9}, L(2)=(0), J(2)=(1/2), |G(2)=0.072 (1970Ma16). Other: |G(2)=0.25 (1974MiYW) 
$A{-2}(3)=0.57 {I6}, A{-4}(3)=+0.12 {I9} (1970Ma16), L(3)=1, |G(3)=0.4 (1974Mi16,1974MiYW). Other: |G(3)=0.203 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6033 
J$from 1970Ma16,1980Al13. Other: 1/2+ in 1980Wa11 
T$Other: 20 keV (1980Wa11) 
$A{-2}=0.541 {I28}, |d=+0.095 {I18} (1980Al13) 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.04 {I1}, A{-4}(2)=-0.02 {I2}, L(2)=1, J(2)=1/2, |G(2)=0.88 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6060 
$A{-2}(2)=+0.62 {I4}, A{-4}(2)=-0.06 {I2}, L(2)=1, J(2)=3/2, |G(2)=0.88 (1970Ma16). 
$A{-2}(3)=+0.49 {I9}, A{-4}(3)=+0.23 {I11}, L(3)=2, J(3)=5/2, |G(3)=0.427 (1970Ma16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6098 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}(2)=+0.06 {I5}, L(2)=1, |G(2)=2.9 (1970Ma16). Other: |G(2)=0.5 (1974MiYW) 
$L(3)=(0), |G(3)=(0.1) (1974MiYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6174 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.27 {I1}, A{-4}(2)=+0.02 {I2}, L(2)=1, |G(2)=14.3 (1970Ma16). Other: L(2)=1, |G(2)=7.6 (1974MiYW). 
$L(3)=0, |G(3)=0.7 (1974MiYW). 
J$A{-2}=0.450 {I17}, |d=-0.002 {I16} (1980Al13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6209 
$L(1)=2, |G(1)=0.05 (1974MiYW) 
$A{-2}(2)=-0.65 {I1}, A{-4}(2)=+0.11 {I2}, L(2)=1, J(2)=3/2, |G(2)=9.0 (1970Ma16) 
$A{-2}(3)=-0.05 {I4}, A{-4}(3)=-0.12 {I6}, L(3)=0, J(3)=1/2, |G(3)=1.9 (1970Ma16) 
J$A{-2}=0.109 {I82}, A{-4}=-0.141 {I56}, A{-6}=-0.243 {I28}, |d=-0.289 {I51} (1980Al13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6270 
$L(2)=1, |G(2)=13 (1974MiYW) 
J$A{-2}=0.198 {I42}, A{-4}=-0.061 {I25}, |d=-0.150 {I24} (1980Al13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$E(p)(LAB)=6960 
$L(2)=(3), |G(2)=(2.5) (1974MiYW) 
$L(3)=(1), |G(3)=(4.5) (1974MiYW) 
$Also a branch to 3352 (1974MiYW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>{+41,45}=-0.305 fm{+2} {I10} (stat) {I137} (syst) (2023Ko19) 
$|d|n{+}{+41,45}=-1199 MHz {I4} (2023Ko19) 
$R{-ch}=3.503 fm {I1} (stat) {I20} (syst) (2023Ko19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
MOMM1$reported as +5.4376 {I80} (stat) {I6} (syst) with uncertainty added in quadrature by compiler. Value is relative to |m({+45}Sc)=+4.75631 {I48}. 
MOME2$reported as -0.185 {I71} (stat) {I1} (syst) with uncertainty added in quadrature by compiler. Value is relative to Q({+45}Sc)=-0.236 {I2}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$IAS of {+42}Ca g.s. 
$The rms charge radius (<r{+2}>){+1/2}: 3.570 fm {I24} (2013An02 evaluation). Other: 3.539 fm {I4} (2006Ga47). 
$|d<r{+2}>({+45}Sc,{+42}Sc)=+0.172 fm{+2} {I31}(stat) {I136}(syst) (2011Av01) 
J$superallowed |b decay to {+42}Ca g.s. and from {+42}Ti g.s.; L({+3}He,t)=0 
T$weighted average of 680.67 ms {I28} (1997Ko65), 683.0 ms {I15} (1965Fr08) and 681.0 ms {I6} (1976Wi08). Others: 684.5 ms {I12} (1972Ha82), 650 ms {I10} (1965Ne02), 720 ms {I30} (1960Mi09), 690 ms {I20} (1961Ja22), 680 ms {I10} (1957Cl40), 620 ms {I50} (1955Mo83). In 2015Ha07 evaluation, T{-1/2}=680.72 ms {i26} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$log| {Ift}=4.16 to 6+; J=7 from p|g(|q) in ({+3}He,p|g). 7+ is most likely from level systematics and shell model expectations. T{-1/2}; weighted average of 62.0 s {I4} (1963Ro10), 60.6 s {I4} (1965Ne02), 62.0 s {I3} (1974Wi14), and 62.2 s {I9} (1978Be61). Other: 68 s {I8} (1994Uz01), 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=3; isotropic |g(|q) to 1+ allows (0,1,2)+. This level is the only candidate as isobaric analog of {+42}Ca (1837,0+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=0, > state. |g(|q) to 0+ favors 1 but 2 is not completely ruled out 
T$from DSAM on 2222.6|g (1971Ro30) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3; |DJ=1 |g to 2+ and RUL 
T$from DSAM on 636|g (1971Ro30). Assume contribution of 636.4|g from 2222.7 level is small (evaluators) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$from 1989Ki11. E=2853.47 {I18} adopted by 1990En08 apparently from 1989Ki11 seems to be a misprint 
J$L({+3}He,p)=4 and L(|a,d)=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$|DJ=(2) |g to (8-); |DJ=(3) |g to 7+ 
T$a crude estimate by 2007Ch40 from transition rates and angular distributions, the value is within an order of magnitude 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$doublet, since T{-1/2} values are different for 636|g and 2223|g 
T$from DSA measurement on 2223|g. T{-1/2}=0.63 ps {I35} from DSA on 636|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Measured upper limit of branching <2% for |g to 1890, 1+, <2% for |g to 611, 1+, and <4% to 616, 7+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$Relative=170 
$L=0 in 2015Fu08; 2,1+3 in 1971Sh16 
E$612 {I4} (2015Fu08), 615 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$from 2014Fu02, 2015Fu08, 1971Sh16 
$B(>) strength=2.173 {i47} for 612 level, which represents about 80% of the total B(>) strength in {+42}Sc 
$Counts(0|')=241037 {I1069} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=68 
E$1491 {I4} (2015Fu08), 1498 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$3+ (1971Sh16) 
$Counts(0|')=10039 {I156} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=29 
E$1586 {I4} (2015Fu08), 1593 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$2+ (1971Sh16) 
$Counts(0|')=666 {I46} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$Relative=15 
E$1887 {I4} (2015Fu08), 1888 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$(3-),(0+ and 1+) (1971Sh16) 
$B(>) strength=0.097 {i3} 
E,J$from 2014Fu02, 2015Fu08 
$Counts(0|')=10701 {I159} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$Relative=12 
E$2220 {I4} (2015Fu08), 2222 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$from 2015Fu08; 1+,2 in 1971Sh16 
$B(>) strength=0.028 {i1} 
$Counts(0|')=3081 {I110} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=20 
E$2272 {I4} (2015Fu08), 2262 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$1+,2 (1971Sh16) 
$Counts(0|')=486 {I42} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=35 {IAP} 
J$1+,2+ (1971Sh16) 
E$2484 {I4} (2015Fu08), 2484 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
$Counts(0|')=460 {I53} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=11 
E$3229 {I4} (2015Fu08), 3237 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$6+ (1971Sh16), (3+,4,5+) in 2015Fu08 
$Counts(0|')=6572 {I139} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$Relative=5 
E$3349 {I4} (2015Fu08), 3340 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
$B(>) strength=0.040 {i1} 
$Counts(0|')=4418 {I112} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=15 
E$3389 {I4} (2015Fu08), 3380 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$3,4- (1971Sh16) 
$Counts(0|')=521 {I64} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$Relative=5 
E$3686 {I4} (2015Fu08), 3670 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$from 2014Fu02, 2015Fu08 
$B(>) strength=0.127 {i3} 
$Counts(0|')=13768 {I182} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=14 
E$3931 {I4} (2015Fu08), 3938 {I5} (1971Sh16) 
J$(3+,4+) (1971Sh16) 
$Counts(0|')=1499 {I62} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$|s=1.1 
L$from 1990Mo13. L=90%(L=0)+10%(L=6) for 1+ and 7+ doublet (1975Wh01) 
d|s/d|W=30 |mb/sr for first maximum at 10|' (1975Wh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|d<r{+2}>({+42g}Sc,{+42m}Sc)=-0.212 fm{+2} {I14}(stat) {I9}(syst) (2021Ko26) 
MOMM1,MOME2$from 2021Ko26, reference to {+45g}Sc with |m=+4.756487 |m{-N} {I2} and Q{-s}=-0.220 b {I2} (2005St24). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius=3.558 fm {I15} (2013An02) 
MOMM1,MOME2$from 2011Av01 (also 2006Ga47) using laser spectroscopy. Others: |m=+4.503 {I4}, Q=-0.208 {I22} (2006Ga47,laser spectroscopy); |m=+4.61 {I4}, Q=-0.26 {I6} (1966Co13, atomic-beam method). 
$Adopted (by 1977En02) spectroscopic factor S=0.81 {I12} (proton stripping) 
$Measured |d<r{+2}>({+45}Sc,{+43}Sc)=+0.082 fm{+2} {I14}(stat) {I88}(syst) (2011Av01). 
J$spin from atomic-beam spectroscopy (1966Co13), parity from L({+3}He,d)=L(d,n)=3 
T$weighted average of 3.92 h {I2} (1945Hi04), 3.95 h {I2} (1963Du11), and 3.885 h {I5} (1969Ra16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
MOMM1$TDPAD method (1977Mi10) 
$Adopted (by 1977En02) spectroscopic factor S=0.35 {I6} (proton stripping) 
T$435 |ms {I30} (1964Br27) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(d,n)=2; M2 |g to 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
Adopted (by 1977En02) spectroscopic factor S=0.13 {I3} (proton stripping) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(d,n)=1; E2 |g to 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 from 7/2-; M1+E2 |g to 7/2-; primary |g from 3/2- resonance in (p,|g). 7/2 ruled out by |g(|q) in (|a,p|g) and RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
Adopted (by 1977En02) spectroscopic factor S=0.24 {I4} (proton stripping) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(d,n)=1, |g to 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,9/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 from 7/2-; M1+E2 |g to 7/2-. J=7/2 ruled out by |g(|q) in (|a,p|g). If 1730|g to 151.8, 3/2+ exists, 9/2 will be ruled out 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 3/2-; |g(|q) in (p,|g) rules out 1/2, prefers 5/2 over 3/2, L({+3}He,d)=L(d,n)=1 support 3/2-. The log| {Ift}=6.4 from 7/2- disfavors 3/2-, but the |b feeding is small and a strong argument cannot be made to rule out 3/2 completely 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=(3+5) from 7/2- implies positive parity for 2114 and/or 2106; whereas L(d,n)=(1) implies negative parity for one of these levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=6 from 7/2-; |DJ=2, E2 |g to 15/2- 
MOMM1,MOME2$TDPAD method (1978Ha07,1981Da06). Others: |m=3.108 {I18} (1994Zh43), 3.15 {I2} (1971Na10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 from 7/2-; |gs to 3/2- and 9/2+ 
T$values <3.5 fs from (p,|g) and >55 fs from (|a,p|g) are discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-:9/2)
level_comment:
J$|g to 7/2-; |g from 6696, 5/2. L({+3}He,d)=3 for a 3328 group gives 5/2-, 7/2- for 3327 or 3332 level. L(p,t)=2 from 7/2- gives negative parity for one or both these levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|gs to 3/2-, 5/2- and 3/2+; possible |g to 7/2-. L(d,n)=3 for a 3330 group suggests 5/2-,7/2- for one of the levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2,7/2)
level_comment:
E,J$L(p,t)=3 from 7/2- implying positive parity and L({+3}He,d)= L(d,n)=3 implying 5/2-,7/2- require two separate levels near this energy. 7/2- is not likely from |g to 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1 |g to 5/2+; |gs to 3/2- and 7/2+; 3/2+ excluded by RUL. L(p,t)=5 from 7/2- for 3807 group is incompatible 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$due to improbable L({+3}He,d)=8 required for 17/2+, the 5187 level in ({+3}He,d) is considered as different from 5200 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$|g decay of resonance and |g(|q) in (p,|g). 1/2- from (p,p) is inconsistent which may indicate a separate level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)-
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.35 {I20} from 7/2- parent state disfavors 3/2, but the level is weakly populated and this argument is not strong enough to reject 3/2 which is supported by L-transfers in other experiments 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|s(DWBA)/|s(EXP)=0.358 
E$474 10 (1966Cu01), 460 (1963La04), 472 (1981Sm03) 
S-factor=0.267, 0.280 (relative to 1 for g.s.) (1985Ba77) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$1180 (1966Cu01), 1200 (1963La04) 
S-factor=1.22, 1.28 (relative to 1 for g.s.) (1985Ba77), 1.39 (1981Sm03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(DWBA)/|s(EXP)=0.394 
E$1812 (1966Cu01), 1820 (1963La04) 
J$1981Sm03 assign 1/2-, but adopted J|p=3/2-. Also |s(|q) fitted well to 3/2- by 1979Th03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$152 ps {I21} (RDM,1971Ba92), 360 ps {I104} (RDM,1967Cr08), 157 ps {I13} (1968Me14), >7.6 ps (1971Po03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from 1971Ba92 by RDM. Others: 4.0 ps {I+18-10} (DSAM,1970Fo06, 1972Ba04), 0.56 ps {I+19-13} (1971Po03), >1.73 ps (1987Fr09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from 1971Ba92 by RDM. Others: 2.1 ps {I+25-8} (1971Po03); 236 fs {I+388-125} (1987Fr09), 3.5 ps {I+14-8} (1972Ba04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,9/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$<21 fs; 57 fs {I+42-36} (1971Po03); 0.055 ps {I21} (1972Ba04), 17 fs {I14} (1987Fr09) 
J$7/2 choice does not seem allowed from p|g(|q) (1970Ba51) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSAM (1970Fo06,1972Ba04). Others: 0.83 ps +|@-50; 1.0 ps {I+27-4} (1971Po03); >1.39 ps (1987Fr09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 1978Ha07. Others: 450 ns {I14} (1971Na10), 0.5 |ms {I1} (1970Sa24) 
G$other: +0.331 {I2} (1971Na10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
E$E(p)(lab)=2643 
J$from Adopted Levels. 9/2+ proposed only by 1977Di17, but |g to 3/2+ rules out this assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=125 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=1248.7 
$|g{-p}{+2}=129.90 
E(p)=1241.9 {I5}, |G{-p}=145 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=145 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=65 eV {I10} 
$E(p)=1797.3 
$|g{-p}{+2}=4.01 
E(p)=1797 {I1}, J|p=1/2-, |G{-p}=120 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=145 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=45 eV {I10} 
$E(p)=1807.0 
$|g{-p}{+2}=2.68 
E(p)=1803.3 {I5}, |G{-p}=75 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=7.8 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=300 eV {I30} 
$E(p)=1822.1 
$|g{-p}{+2}=16.88 
E(p)=1822 {I1}, |G{-p}=1450 eV {I50}, |g{-p}{+2}=135 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=190 eV {I20} 
$E(p)=2016.8 
$|g{-p}{+2}=5.52 
E(p)=2021 {I1}, |G{-p}=310 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=13.7 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=240 eV {I25} 
$E(p)=2029.8 
$|g{-p}{+2}=2.73 
E(p)=2033 {I1}, |G{-p}=280 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=5.3 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=150 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2054.4 
$|g{-p}{+2}=1.59 
E(p)=2059 {I1}, |G{-p}=205 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=4 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=165 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2061.9 
$|g{-p}{+2}=4.19 
E(p)=2066 {I1}, |G{-p}=214 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=9.6 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=150 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2147.8 
$|g{-p}{+2}=2.97 
E(p)=2151 {I1}, |G{-p}=224 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=7.2 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=3.00 keV {I30} 
$E(p)=2454.2 
$|g{-p}{+2}=27.92 
E(p)=2460 {I1}, |G{-p}=2.92 keV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=42.2 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=600 eV {I60} 
$E(p)=2467.0 
$|g{-p}{+2}=2.46 
E(p)=2473 {I1}, |G{-p}=540 eV {I20}, |g{-p}{+2}=4 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=100 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2493.7 
$|g{-p}{+2}=0.39 
E(p)=2500 {I2}, |G{-p}=130 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=0.9 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=700 eV {I70} 
$E(p)=2498.0 
$|g{-p}{+2}=5.93 
E(p)=2504 {I2}, |G{-p}=676 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=8.6 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=80 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2507.0 
$|g{-p}{+2}=0.30 
E(p)=2514 {I2}, |G{-p}=85 eV {I5}, |g{-p}{+2}=0.5 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=400 eV {I40} 
$E(p)=2703.2 
$|g{-p}{+2}=1.08 
E(p)=2715 {I2}, |G{-p}=380 eV {I30}, |g{-p}{+2}=1.1 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=125 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2720.1 
$|g{-p}{+2}=0.69 
E(p)=2727 {I2}, |G{-p}=150 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=1.2 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=400 eV {I40} 
$E(p)=2730.6 
$|g{-p}{+2}=2.16 
E(p)=2737 {I2}, |G{-p}=550 eV {I20}, |g{-p}{+2}=4.5 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=80 eV {I15} 
$E(p)=2733.4 
$|g{-p}{+2}=0.21 
E(p)=2740 {I2}, |G{-p}=90 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=0.4 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=3.50 keV {I35} 
$E(p)=2753.7 
$|g{-p}{+2}=18.16 
E(p)=2761 {I2}, |G{-p}=770 eV {I40}, |g{-p}{+2}=5.6 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=15 eV {I5} 
$E(p)=2760.2 
$|g{-p}{+2}=0.33 
E(p)=2768 {I2}, |G{-p}=30 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=1 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|G{-p}=185 eV {I20} 
$E(p)=2765.2 
$|g{-p}{+2}=0.94 
E(p)=2772 {I2}, J|p=1/2-, |G{-p}=320 eV {I10}, |g{-p}{+2}=2.3 keV (1974Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$RELATIVE=0.11 {ILE} 
J$poor fit of |s(|q) and Ay(|q) data in (pol p,|a) to 17/2- due probably to contribution from other levels in the vicinity or to complex reaction mechanism 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=3.5432 fm {I16} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated change in charge radius |d<r{+2}>({+44}Sc-{+45}Sc)=-0.019 fm{+2} {I11} (2013An02) 
J$spin from atomic beam method (1966Co13); parity from L({+3}He,d)=L(p,d)=L(d,t) from 7/2-; also natural parity from (pol d,|a). 
T$from 2016Ga24, weighted average of four measurements using an ionization chamber and three measurements using an HPGe detector. Others: 4.042 h {I7} (2022Du13), 3.927 h {I8} (1969Ra16), 4.00 h {I2} (1966Ta01), 4.05 h {I3} (1969Sa34), 3.92 h {I3} (1945Hi05); values without uncertainties: 3.9 h (1963Di06), 4.04 h (1961Ra06), 4.01 h (1961Kh06), 3.90 h (1954An25), 3.96 h (1948Wa13), 3 h (1934Zy01). Due to discrepancies between some values, weighted average cannot be obtained with an acceptable small |h{+2} from those values listed with uncertainties. Unweighted average of all the values with uncertainties is 3.997 h {I24}. 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2011Av01, also 2006Ga47). Others: |m=+2.56 {I3} from atomic beam method (1966Co13, 1963Ha37, 1963Ha44); Q=+0.10 {I5} (atomic beam method, 1966Co13, 1963Ha37, 1963Ha44). Note that 2021StZZ evaluation, and earlier 2016St14 and 2014StZZ compilations, incorrectly, quote Q=+0.10 {I5} from 2011Av01, and +0.16 {I4} from 1966Co13, whereas values in these references are given as +0.16 {I4} in 2011Av01 and +0.10 {I5} in 1966Co13. Evaluators have adopted +0.16 {I4} from 2011Av01 
$Measured rms charge radius |d<r{+2}>({+45}Sc,{+44}Sc)=-0.019 fm{+2} {I44} (2011Av01, also 2006Ga47); measured using collinear laser spectroscopy with an uncertainty of 0.011 fm{+2} (stat) and 0.043 fm{+2} (syst). 2021Ko26 recalibrated charge radii and listed the following value: |d<r{+2}>({+45}Sc,{+44}Sc)=-0.081 fm{+2} {I11} (stat) {I87} (syst); and rms charge radius=3.535 fm{+2} {I3} (stat) {I12} (syst) 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.60 {I15} (L=3) (proton stripping), 0.34 {I5} (L=3) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$67.9|g E1 to 2+; 78.3|g M1 from 0- 
MOMM1,MOME2$from time-dependant perturbed angular correlation (TDPAC) in 1967Ri06 for |m and in 1973Ha61 for Q 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$234.85|g D(+Q) to 2+, 166.9|g D(+Q) to 1-; L({+3}He,t)=3 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a). 
T$from |g|g(t) with fast timing in (p,d|g). Others: 6.12 ns {I23} from |g|g(t) in (p,n|g); 12.7 ns {I22} from RDM in ({+18}O,pn|g) is discrepant 
MOMM1$from time-dependent perturbed angular distribution (TDPAD) in 1975Br12. See also 1975Ch37, 1974Dr10, 1976Dr03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$spin from atomic beam method (1966Co13); parity from L({+3}He,d)=L(p,d)=L(d,t)=3 from 7/2- 
T$from 1969Ra16. Others: 58.7 h {I3} (2022Du13), 58.6 h {I5} (1956Ru45), 59.0 h (1954An25), 61.2 h {I17} (1952Ru23), 56.9 h {I19} (1950Br52), 58.6 h {I7} (1945Hi05), 52 h (1940Wa01) 
MOMM1,MOME2$from collinear laser spectroscopy (2011Av01, also 2006Ga47). Others: |m=+3.88 {I1}, Q=-0.19 {I2} (atomic beam, 1966Co13, 1963Ha37, 1963Ha44). Note that 2021StZZ evaluation, and earlier 2016St14 and 2014StZZ compilations, incorrectly, quote Q=-0.19 {I2} from 2011Av01, and -0.21 {I9} from 1966Co13, whereas values in these references are given as -0.21 {I9} in 2011Av01 and -0.19 {I2} in 1966Co13. Evaluators have adopted -0.21 {I9} from 2011Av01 
$Measured rms charge radius |d<r{+2}>({+45}Sc,{+44m}Sc)=-0.070 fm{+2} (2011Av01); measured using collinear laser spectroscopy. The {I15} uncertainty is 0.011 fm{+2} statistical and 0.010 fm{+2} systematic. 2021Ko26 recalibrated charge radii and listed the following value: |d<r{+2}>({+45}Sc,{+44m}Sc)=-0.072 fm{+2} {I11} (stat) {I3} (syst) 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.63 {I13} (L=3) (proton stripping), 0.49 {I7} (L=3) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$349.87|g |DJ=2, E2 to 2+; L({+3}He,t)=L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+ 
T$from |g|g(t) in (p,d|g). Others: 3.12 ns {I28} from RDM in ({+18}O,pn|g), 3.1 ns {I3} from RDM in ({+19}F,2pn|g), 3.13 ns {I19} from |g(t) in ({+16}O,pn|g), and 3.13 ns {I19} from |g|g(t) in (p,n|g) 
MOMM1$from integral perturbed angular distribution in 1975Ch37. 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.57 {I12} (L=3) and 0.03 {I1} (L=1) (proton stripping); 0.37 {I5} (L=3) and 0.03 {I1} (L=1) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$356.92|g E2, |DJ=2 to 1- 
T$weighted average of 378 ps {I42} from RDM in ({+18}O,pn|g), 380 ps {I40} from RDM in ({+19}F,2pn|g), and 364 ps {I10} from |g|g(t) in (p,d|g). 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.57 {I6} (L=2) (proton stripping); 0.06 {I2} (L=2) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=0 from 7/2-; L({+3}He,t)=5 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|g). 
T$weighted average of 381 ps {I56} from RDM in ({+19}F,pn|g), 411 ps {I30} from RDM in ({+18}O,pn|g), and 336 ps {I15} from |g|g(t) in (p,d|g). 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.05 {I2} (L=0) (proton stripping); 0.13 {I4} (L=2) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$the 642 level proposed by 1971PoZP in (p,|g) based on a 496|g to 146 level is proved to be erroneous by 1973Dr08 in (|a,n|g) due to non-observation of the 496|g. The 641 level here is proposed by 1973Ar14 in (|a,n|g) based on a 573.4|g to 68 level and is adopted by the evaluators. It could be questionable considering this level and the associated 573.4|g are not reported in 1973Dr08. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=0+2 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a); 666.7|g M1(+E2) to 2+ 
T$weighted average of 55 fs {I+28-14} from DSAM in ({+19}F,pn|g) and 49 fs {I+16-19} from DSAM in (|a,n|g) 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.53 {I14} (L=3) (proton stripping); 0.33 {I5} (L=3) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,|a)=L(|a,d)=2 from 0+; L(p,d)=L(d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2-; L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a). 
T$weighted average of 250 fs {I+69-56} from ({+19}F,pn|g) and 215 fs {I56} from (|a,n|g) 
$Adopted (1977En02) spectroscopic factors S: 0.25 {I7} (L=3) and 0.08 {I2} (L=1) (proton stripping); 0.19 {I3} (L=3) (neutron pickup). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=7 from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,2pn|g); L(p,d)=L(d,t)=3 from 7/2-; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a) 
T$from RDM in ({+19}F,2pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2- and L({+3}He,p)=2+4 for (968+987) doublet; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a) 
T$other: >0.9 ps from DSAM in ({+19}F,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$375.6|g to 4-, 656.5|g to 4+, 771.7|g to 2-; L(d,t)=(0) from 7/2-; 4- proposed by 2005La19 in ({+18}O,p3n|g). 
T$from RDM in ({+18}O,pn|g). Other: |>5.5 ps from DSAM in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,|a)=3 and L({+3}He,d)=L(d,t)=1+3 from 7/2-; L(|a,d)=L(pol d,|a)=L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+; L({+3}He,t)=6 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). Other: 1142 {I6} from (pol d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=2 and L(pol d,|a)=(2) from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a); 1+,(2+) from |s(|q) in ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,d)=2 and L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a) 
T$from DSAM in ({+19}F,pn|g). Other: 39 fs {I15} from DSAM in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$772.48|g E2, |DJ=2 to 3-, 566.39|g M1 to 4- 
T$from RDM in ({+18}O,pn|g). Other: >2 ps from DSAM in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,3,5)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1410 {I20} from (p,d), 1415 {I10} from (d,t), and 1424 {I20} from ({+3}He,|a). The evaluators consider this level different from 1426 level seen in |g-ray studies. See comments for 1426 level. 
J$L(d,t)=2 and L(p,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=(2) from 7/2-; probable natural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a) for a group at 1427 {I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$level populated in |g-ray studies in (|a,n|g), (p,n|g) and ({+19}F,pn|g) is considered different from that in particle-transfer reactions since spin-parity from 1426|g M1+E2 to 2+, based on 1426|g(|q) in (p,n|g) and measured T{-1/2} using 1426|g in ({+19}F,pn|g), is inconsistent with L(d,t)=2 and L(p,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=(2) from 7/2- and L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+. It is likely there are more than one levels at about this energy. See 1416 and 1428 levels. 
J$1426|g M1+E2 to 2+; 1358|g D(+Q) to 1-; 1+ ruled out by 1001|g to 3- since it would result in a B(M2)(W.u.)=13500 greatly exceeding RUL=3. Also note that analyzing power in (pol d,|a) indicates probable natural parity for a group at 1427 {I6} 
T$from RDM in ({+19}F,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). The evaluators consider this level different from 1426 level seen in |g-ray studies. See comments for 1426 level. 
J$L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+; probable natural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a) for a group at 1427 {I6}; L({+3}He,d)=1+3 for a group at 1433 {I18} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(d,t)=1+3 from 7/2-; L({+3}He,t)=6 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$see comments for 1608 level 
J$1524.5|g to 1-; L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- for a group at 1598 {I12}, which could be a doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)+
level_comment:
E$this level populated in ({+3}He,t) is considered different from the 1592 level in (|a,n|g) since the 1524.5|g from 1592 level to 1- is inconsistent with L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+. Also note that the group at 1598 {I12} with L=1+3 in ({+3}He,d) could be a doublet. 
J$L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+, (3,4)+ proposed based on |s(|q) by 1972Ma50 in ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$levels at 1653 {I12} from ({+3}He,d), 1652 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 1660 {I20} from (p,d), and 1654 {I10} from (d,t) could be a doublet corresponding to 1648.3+1651.6. 
J$1580.4|g to 1-; L({+3}He,t)=3 from 7/2- for a probable doublet at 1654 {I10}. But L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2- for a group at 1653 {I12}, giving |p=+, is inconsistent, which may indicate a different level from those populated in ({+3}He,t), (p,d) and (d,t), which all have have negative parity based on measured L-transfers. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$this level was associated (1990En08) with the 1685 level in particle-transfer reactions. But |g to 1- is in conflicts with J|p=(4,6)- for 1685 level since it leads to unacceptable transition rates. 
E$see comments for 1683 level 
J$1612.7|g to 1-; possible 1677|g to 2+; L(pol d,|a)=(1,3) from 0+ and unnatural parity from analyzing power for a group at 1681 {I6}, which is considered different from the 1683 level due to different spins. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)-
level_comment:
E$the evaluators consider this level different from the 1680 seen in (|a,n|g) and the 1681 in (pol d,|a) based on different spins or parities. 
J$spin=5 is proposed by 2005La19 in ({+18}O,p3n|g), but supporting data are not given; L(|a,d)=L({+3}He,t)=5 from 0+; 1052.3|g to 4-, 1151.8|g to 3(-); band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=2 from 7/2-; unnatural parity from analyzing power; 1699.7|g to 1- cannot be M2 or higher based on RUL with measured T{-1/2}. But L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- giving |p=+ for a group at 1773 {I13} is inconsistent, which may indicate a different level at about this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1813 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) and 1811 {I6} from (pol d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=0,2 from 0+; unnatural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,4)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1958 {I15} from (|a,p), 1956 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 1959 {I4} from ({+3}He,t), and 1957 {I6} from (pol d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2-; probable natural parity from analyzing power in (pol d,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2029 {I15} from (|a,p), 2035 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2036 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 2038 {I8} from (d,t), 2031 {I6} from (pol d,|a). 
J$unnatural parity from (pol d,|a); 2+ to 5+ from L({+3}He,d)=1+3, inconsistent with 3-,4- from L(d,t)=0+2, levels populated in the two reactions may be different. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2107 {I15} from (|a,p), 2104 {I6} from ({+3}He,d), 2106 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 2108 {I5} from (d,t), and 2104 {I6} from (pol d,|a). Levels populated in these reactions may be different due to different spin-parities. 
J$inconsistency among 2+ to 5+ from L({+3}He,d)=1+3, 1- to 6- from L(d,t)=2, 5+,6+,7+ from L({+3}He,t)=6, 4-,6- from L(d,|a)=5 and |p=unnatural from analyzing power. levels populated in these reactions may be different. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2175 {I15} from (|a,p), 2173 {I11} from ({+3}He,d), 2174 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 2186 {I10} from (d,t), and 2179 {I6} from (pol d,|a). Levels populated in these reactions may be different due to different spin-parities. 
J$natural parity from (pol d,|a); inconsistency between 2+ to 5+ from L({+3}He,d)=1+3 and 1- to 6- from L(d,t)=2, levels populated in these reactions may be different. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2210 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 2213 {I5} from (d,t), 2210 {I20} from ({+3}He,|a), and 2213 {I6} from (pol d,|a). Levels populated in these reactions may be different due to different spin-parities. 
J$unnatural parity from (pol d,|a); inconsistency among (3+,4+,5+) from L({+3}He,t)=(4), (1- to 6-) from L({+3}He,|a)=(2), and 3-,4- from L(d,t)=0+2, levels populated in these reactions may be different. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2241 {I15} from (|a,p), 2250 {I14} from ({+3}He,d), 2240 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 2243 {I10} from (d,t), and 2241 {I6} from (pol d,|a). Levels populated in these reactions may be different due to different spin-parities. 
J$natural parity from (pol d,|a); inconsistency 0+ to 7+ from L({+3}He,d)=3, 1- to 6- from L(d,t)=2, 1+,2+,3+ from L({+3}He,p)=2, levels populated in these reactions may be different. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2292 {I15} from (|a,p) and 2295 {I9} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1 : 6)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2333 {I15} from (|a,p), 2334 {I5} from ({+3}He,d), 2325 {I8} from ({+3}He,t), 2333 {I10} from (d,t), and 2333 {I6} from (pol d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=2 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2383 {I5} from ({+3}He,d), 2374 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 2383 {I6} from (pol d,|a) 
J$unnatural parity from (pol d,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2423 {I15} from (|a,p), 2427 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), and 2425 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2-; L({+3}He,t)=(4) from 0+; (3,4)+ proposed based on analysis of |s(|q) in ({+3}He,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2470 {I15} from (|a,p) and 2476 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2484 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 2492 {I5} from (d,t), and 2492 {I6} from (pol d,|a) 
J$unnatural parity from (pol d,|a) and L(d,t)=0 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1 : 6)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2525 {I11} from ({+3}He,d), 2516 {I4} from ({+3}He,t), and 2526 {I10} from (d,t) 
J$L(d,t)=2 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2589 {I15} from (|a,p), 2585 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 2586 {I5} from (d,t), and 2584 {I20} from ({+3}He,|a). Other: 2591 {I14} probably a different level 
J$L(d,t)=0 and L({+3}He,|a)=(0) from 7/2-, L({+3}He,t)=(3) from 0+, but L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- for a group at 2591 {I14} is inconsistent, which may indicate a different level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2616 {I15} from (|a,d), 2615 {I3} from (p,|g), 2617 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2625 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 2622 {I8} from (d,t) 
J$L(d,t)=0+2 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2712 {I8} from ({+3}He,d) and 2702 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). Others: 2768 {I15} from (|a,p), 2784 {I10} from (d,t), and 2763 {I20} from ({+3}He,|a), and 2830 {I50} from (p,{+3}He) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=L({+3}He,t)=L(p,{+3}He)=0 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2924 {I15} from (|a,p), 2930 {I30} from (|a,d), 2931 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2916 {I4} from ({+3}He,t), 2912 {I10} from (d,t), and 2907 {I20} from ({+3}He,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2-; L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3010 {I11} from ({+3}He,d) and 3011 {I10} from (d,t) 
J$L(d,t)=0+2 from 7/2-; but inconsistent with L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ for a group at 3000, and L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+ for a group at 3014 {I40}, levels populated in these reactions may be different. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3071 {I8} from ({+3}He,d) and 3080 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3098 {I15} from (|a,p), 3097 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), and 3105 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3204 {I7} from ({+3}He,d), 3221 {I4} from ({+3}He,t), and 3206 {I10} from (d,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3275 {I15} from (|a,p), 3281 {I15} from ({+3}He,d), and 3289 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- and L({+3}He,p)=6 from 0+. But L({+3}He,t)=(0) from 0+ is inconsistent, which may indicate a different level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3366 {I15} from (|a,p) and 3370 {I14} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3406 {I15} from (|a,p) and 3419 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=(0) from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3439 {I15} from (|a,p) and 3427 {I11} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 35 ps {I7} from RDM in ({+19}F,pn|g) and 48.3 ps {I17} from RDM in ({+19}F,2pn|g) 
J$spin from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,2pn|g); 854.5|g E2, |DJ=2 to 9+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4042 {I15} from (|a,p) and 4038 {I14} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4132 {I15} from (|a,p), 4150 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), and 4139 {I4} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4298 {I15} from (|a,p) and 4293 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1973Dr08 prove that the 642 level deexcited by a single 496|g in (p,|g) by 1971PoZP is erroneous due to non-observation of the 496|g, which is not observed in 1973Ar14 either. But this 641 level proposed by 1973Ar14 is based on a 573.4|g to the 68 level. This level is considered different from the 642 level in 1971PoZP and kept by the evaluators, even though the 573.4|g from 1973Ar14 is not reported in 1973Dr08. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this level is listed in Table II of 1973Ar14, but not adopted in their proposed level scheme and it is not reported in 1973Dr08 and other studies. It is therefore considered questionable and not included in the Adopted dataset by the evaluators. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$other: 667 {I5} (1972Ma50) 
L$0 from 2013Fu08, 2 from 2011St03 
S$for L=0 (2013Fu08) 
$Intensity=182999 {I752} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 976 {I5} (1972Ma50) and 986 {I4} (2013Fu08) 
L$other: |>1 from 2013Fu08 
$Intensity=251 {I33} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1189 {I5} (1972Ma50) and 1187 {I4} (2013Fu08) 
L$other: |>1 from 2013Fu08 
$Intensity=3964 {I116} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1812 {I5} (1972Ma50) and 1814 {I4} (2013Fu08) 
J$(2+) proposed by 1972Ma50 from L=2, but it is inconsistent with L=0 from 2013Fu08 
L$0 from 2013Fu08, 2 from 1972Ma50 
S$for L=0 (2013Fu08) 
$Intensity=15114 {I219} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2423 {I5} (1972Ma50) and 2426 {I4} (2013Fu08) 
L$other: |>1 from 2013Fu08 
$Intensity=783 {I70} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2781 {I5} (1972Ma50) and 2779 {I4} (2013Fu08). 
$Isobar analog state (IAS) 
L$from 2013Fu08 and 1972Ma50 
$Intensity=130172 {I859} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2922 {I10} (1972Ma50) and 2915 {I4} (2013Fu08) 
$Intensity=7167 {I218} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3076 {I10} (1972Ma50) and 3081 {I4} (2013Fu08) 
$Intensity=524 {I101} (2013Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
E$others: 633 {I12} (1964Bj01), 650 {I30} (1972Gu10) 
L$from 1972Gu10 for a group at 650 {I30}, which could be a doublet of 631+667 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from fast-timing using Rf-LaBr{-3}, but a value of 2.499 ns {I15} from fast-timing using LaBr{-3}-LaBr{-3} is significantly discrepant (2022Ms01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 155.6 ns {I7} (1988Al27), 155 ns {I2} (1975Gu24), 166 ns {I5} (1963Kl06), 153 ns {I2} (1967Ri06), 153 ns {I1} (1962Th12), 180 ns {I20} (1959Cy90). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J J=7/2 from AB (1976Fu06, 1959Fr53). |p=- from L({+3}He,d)=3 
MOMM1 NMR; {+2}H standard 
MOME2 ABLDF; no pol correction. Others: -0.216 {I9} (1971Ch25. AB), -0.220 {I2} (2000Ke12. Molecular spectroscopy), and -0.236 {I2} (2001Mi40. NMR; Sternheimer correction applied) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,d)=2; D,E2 |g from 1/2- IAR 
T$mean lifetime |t=0.470 s {I6} from timing of K x-rays in Coulomb excitation (1967Bl14). Authors of 1967Bl14 mentioned that the lifetime measured in this work superseded their earlier lifetime reported in 1964Ho14. Value of 0.32 s {I1} from 1967Bl14 cited in Nuclear Data Sheets evaluations (2008Bu01,1992Bu01,1983Bu21,1977Be63,1970Le28) seems erroneous. Note by B. Singh, May 01, 2021. 
MOMM1,MOME2$collinear LASER spectroscopy using IGISOL. {+45}Sc g.s. |m=+4.756487 {I2} (2005St24, 1969Lu01, 1951Pr02) and Q=-0.220 {I2} (2005St24, 2000Ke12) used as references. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,d)=1; E2 |g to 7/2- 
T from B(E2)|^ in Coul. ex. Others: 101 ps {I28} (RDM), >1.1 ps (DSAM), and 3.5 ps {I13} (DSAM) in (p,p'|g) and >4 ps from DSAM in (|a,p|g). See also discussion in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(d,{+3}He)=2; E1(+M2) |g to 7/2- 
T other DSAM measurements: >0.38 ps from (n,n'|g) and >0.55 ps from (p,p'|g). 105 ps {I28} (RDM) in (p,p'|g) discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L(d,{+3}He)=3; D+Q |g to 3/2+ 
T from (|g,|g). Others: 0.25 ps {I+8-6} (DSAM) from (|a,p|g), 0.15 ps {I10} (DSAM) from (n,n'|g), 193 fs {I22} (DSAM) from (p,p'|g), and 0.5 ps {I4} from B(E1)|^ in Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from DSAM in (|a,p|g). Other: >2.6 ps (DSAM) from (p,p'|g). <0.97 ps (DSAM) from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2+,7/2+ from E1(+M2) |g to 7/2-; E2 |g to 3/2+. Ne 5/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g) 
T other: >0.42 ps (DSAM) from (n,n'|g). 0.36 ps {I4} from B(E1)|^=7.5|*10{+-6} {I8} in Coul. ex. is discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |p=- from L(p,p')=2. J=7/2,11/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g). J=5/2,11/2 from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. 
T from (|g,|g). Others: 2.4 ps {I+10-6} from (|a,p|g) and 1.60 ps {I34} from (p,p'|g); DSAM. 0.12 ps {I8} (DSAM) from (n,n'|g) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(d,{+3}He)=2; |g from 1/2- IAR 
T weighted ave of 2.4 ps {I+12-7} from (|a,p|g) and 2.3 ps {I+9-5} from (p,p'|g); DSAM. >5.5 ps (1980Bu08; DSAM) discrepant in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2-,7/2- from M1+E2 |g to 7/2- and D,E2 |g to 3/2-; Ne 3/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g). Member of K|p=3/2- band 
T other: 0.28 ps {I14} (DSAM) from (n,n'|g). <0.12 ps from (p,|g) and 0.43 ps {I+12-8} from (|a,p|g) are discrepant; DSAM. Note that T{-1/2}=299 fs {I19} from (|g,|g) assuming J=5/2 is more compatible with the adopted T{-1/2} than 398 fs {I24} assuming 7/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2+,9/2+ from E2(+M3) |g to 5/2+; D+Q |g from 11/2+. Ne 7/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g). 
T unweighted ave of 5.4 ps {I+30-15} from (|a,p|g) and 1.9 ps {I13} from (p,p'|g); DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J M1+E2 |g to 7/2-; D(+Q) |g to 11/2- 
T others: 0.14 ps {I+5-4} from (|a,p|g) and 0.13 {I9} from (p,|g); DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 9/2+,11/2+ from D,E2 |g to 11/2-; E2(+M3) |g to 7/2+. Ne 9/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g) 
T weighted ave. of 0.37 ps {I19} (598|g) and 0.66 ps {I25} (1057|g) in (p,p'|g), 0.97 ps {I14} in ({+18}O,p2n|g), and 1.1 ps {I+6-3} in (|a,p|g); DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) |g's to 3/2- and 7/2- 
T others: <35 fs from (|a,p|g), 21 fs {I9} from (n,n'|g), and <7.6 fs from (p,p'|g); DSAM. 85 meV 9 in (|g,|g). See also discussion in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J from p|g(|q) and linear polarization in (|a,p|g). 1981Bo37 in (pol p,|a) noted that there may Be significant fragmentation of the ((|n f{-7/2}){++2}(|p f{-7/2})) pickup strength to 15/2- states in {+45}Sc. 
T other: >6 ps (DSAM) from (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+,7/2+
level_comment:
J |g's to 9/2+ and 3/2+ 
T 69 fs {I14} from (n,n'|g) and 0.41 ps {I17} from (p,p'|g) are discrepant; DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2,11/2- from D,E2 |g's to 7/2- and 11/2-. D,E2 |g? to 7/2+ 
T see also discussion in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 1/2,3/2,5/2 from D,E2 |g's to 3/2- and 3/2+. 5/2- from D,E2 |g? to 9/2-. L({+3}He,d)=1 for E(level)=2290 
T other: 0.83 ps {I83} (DSAM) from (n,n'|g). See also discussion in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2- from D,E2 |g to 7/2- and D,E2 |g from 3/2- IAR. 7/2,9/2,11/2- from Hauser-Feshbach in (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
J |g's to 3/2+ and 5/2+ and from 3/2(-) res 
T 81 fs {I+38-17} from (p,|g) and 21 fs {I5} from (p,p'|g) are discrepant; DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2,7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D,E2 |g's to 3/2- and 7/2- 
T other: 10 fs {I5} from DSAM in (p,p'|g) depending on placement of 2590|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
J |g's to 3/2+ and 5/2- and from 3/2(-) res 
T 13 fs {I4} from (p,|g) and 69 fs {I14} from (n,n'|g) are discrepant; DSAM. Other: <20 fs from (p,p'|g), DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2+,15/2+ from |DJ=1 M1(+E2) or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 13/2+ and |DJ=0 d or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 11/2+. Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 13/2,17/2+ from |DJ=0 d or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 15/2+ and |DJ=1 d+Q or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 15/2-. Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 13/2+,17/2,19/2+ from D,E2 |g to 17/2+ and |DJ=1 d+Q or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 15/2+. Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 17/2,21/2+ from |DJ=0 d or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 17/2+ and |DJ=1 d+Q or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 19/2-. Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_comment:
J 19/2,21/2,23/2 from |DJ=1 d+Q or |DJ=2 |g to 19/2- and |g's to 17/2- and 19/2-. Member of |pf{-7/2}{+5} band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 19/2,23/2+ from |DJ=0 d or |DJ=2 E2 |g to 19/2+ and D,E2 |g to 21/2+. Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2+)
level_comment:
J 23/2,25/2,29/2,31/2 from |DJ=1 d+Q or |DJ=2 Q |g to 27/2+. Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2+)
level_comment:
J from DCO ratios and linear polarization in ({+18}O,p2n|g) (2001Be12. No details given). Parentheses added by the evaluator. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (33/2+)
level_comment:
J (27/2+,29/2,31/2,33/2+) from |g's to (29/2+) and (31/2+). Member of |pd{-3/2}{+-1}f{-7/2}{+6} band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Primarily excited in the annihilation of positrons with atomic electrons (1986Bo06). See {+45}Sc(e{++},X|g) for estimated |s's. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_comment:
J 9/2-,11/2,13/2,15/2+ from |g's to (13/2+) and 15/2-. 15/2 from syst of decays of lower state members of the positive parity band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
J 13/2 to 17/2 from D |g to 15/2-. 17/2 from 123|g(|q) if J(3693)=19/2; 13/2,17/2 if J(3693)=15/2. |=15/2 from lack of |g to 11/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2+ from D,E2 |g's to 3/2+ and 7/2-; |=5/2 from p|g(|q) to 3/2+, |=3/2 from p|g(|q) to 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 9/2,11/2,13/2+ from D,E2 |g's to 11/2+, 9/2+, and 11/2-; |p=+ if J=11/2 from M1+E2 |g to 9/2+. Member of |p=+ band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$gW(125|')|G{-0}{+2}/|G, meV=0.38 {I2} 
J g|G(0)|?g|G(0)(E2) lends support to 11/2- assignment (1973Ar04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
$gW(125|')|G{-0}{+2}/|G, meV=1.32 {I8} 
T 2.20 meV 14 if J=5/2; 1.65 meV 10 if J=7/2. See comment in Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
$gW(125|')|G{-0}{+2}/|G, meV=16 {I1} 
T J=7/2. Others: |?3.33 meV 21 if J=3/2 and |?2.22 meV 14 if J=5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T 101 ps {I28} (1980Bu08; RDM) not adopted since the value is discrepant with DSAM in (p,p'|g) and (|a,p|g), BE1|^ in Coul. ex., and |G in (|g,|g). Other: >0.55 ps (1980Bu08; DSAM) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_comment:
State and associated gammas observed only by 1975Da16 in (p,p'|g). 2208|g from the 2220 state probably corresponds to 2209|g observed by 1972Ek02 in (p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=0.470 s {I6} from timing of K x-rays in Coulomb excitation (1967Bl14). Authors of 1967Bl14 mentioned that the lifetime measured in this work superseded their earlier lifetime reported in 1964Ho14. Value of 0.32 s {I1} from 1967Bl14 cited in Nuclear Data Sheets evaluations (2008Bu01,1992Bu01,1983Bu21,1977Be63,1970Le28) seems erroneous. Note by B. Singh, May 01, 2021. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S 0.90 {I18} (1979Do12), 0.56 (1971Oh02) if J|p=3/2+; 0.62 {I13} (1979Do12), 0.35 (1971Oh02) if J|p=5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
Not strongly excited in contrast to {+43}Sc. This may reflect significant fragmentation of the configuration=((|n f{-7/2}){++2}(|p f{-7/2})) pickup strength to 15/2- states in {+45}Sc. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+,11/2-)
level_comment:
J DWBA with J|p=9/2+ represented the data well, but recognition of possible forward-angle contributions from low-spin states also suggested J|p=11/2- as a possible assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_comment:
J nearly flat |s(|q) to 35|'. J|p=17/2+ reproduced |s(|q) and gave the correct qualitative representation of the analyzing power. J|p=19/2- was thought to be unlikely due to the strong excitation of the 3.69-MeV state, but could not be ruled out on the basis of model-independent arguments 
S 0.19 if J|p=19/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2-
level_comment:
J J|p=21/2,23/2- from {+28}Si({+19}F,2p|g), {+30}Si({+18}O,p2n|g),... (1975Bi09). In back-angle spectra this was the second strongest line. Two-step reaction calculation with a 2+ inelastic excitation and a J|p=19/2- three-nucleon transfer showed preference for J|p=23/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$from atomic beam (1976Fu06,1962Pe21). 
T$from 1991BaZS; weighted average (LWN) of 83.73 d {I11} (1983Wa26), 83.79 d {I6} (1982HoZJ), 83.79 d {I6} (1980Ol03), 83.819 d {I6} (1980Ho17) and 83.752 d {I15} (1980RuZY). Others: 83.85 d {I3} (1977MeZP), 84.34 d {I13} (1974Cr05), 83.69 d {I9} (1972BaWG) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$from (t,{+3}He); also J=4- from (p,{+3}He) and (d,|a), but J=3- from (n,|g). 
T$T{-1/2}>3.5 ps from (|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of values from (d,p), ({+3}He,t), and (d,|a). 
J$from |s and L=3 in (d,p) and L=6 in (d,|a); also J|p=7+ from (|a,d) 
Reported as yrast 7+ level from (|a,p|g) (1977DrZY); |g decay modes not reported. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,(4+)
level_comment:
J$M1 |g to 4+ level; but J=2- from (t,{+3}He) and (pol d,|a); J=0-,1-,2- from L=1 in (d,|a); possible doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of values from (t,{+3}He), (d,{+3}He), (p,{+3}He), (d,|a) and (pol d,|a). 
J$J=2- from (t,{+3}He) and (pol d,|a); J=0-,1-,2- from L=1 in (d,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of values from ({+3}He,p), (d,p) and (|a,d). 
J L=0 in ({+3}He,p); |p=+ from L(d,p)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 18.765 s {I45} (1972BeWN) and 18.67 s {I9} (1967Yu01) from decay of 142.5|g. See also 1972Bf03, 1948Go16. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
Reported by 1977DrZY as yrast 7+ level from {+43}Ca(|a,p|g); details including |g decay modes not given. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E weighted average of values from 1982Ti02 and 1980Li07. The least square fit results in the value 8760.800 {I19} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$ from Adopted dataset for {+46}Sc in ENSDF database 
MOMM1$ measured by COLLAPS method (2022Ba15). Other: +3.036 {I6} measured with CLS method (2022Ba15). 
MOME2$ measured by COLLAPS method (2022Ba15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J J=7/2 from AB (1976Fu06,1966Co13); |p=- from L(p)=3 
T weighted av (1986Re12) based on individual values of 3.3500 d 6 (|g's; NaI integral counting, 10 d's), 3.3480 d {I31} and 3.3525 d {I15} (159|g; HPGe, 10 d's), and 3.3478 d {I10}, 3.3491 d {I19}, and 3.3483 d {I6} (|b{+-}'s; ic, |>5 T{-1/2}'s). Others: 3.345 d {I3} (weighted av of NaI (29 keV|<E|g|<10 MeV; 13 and 17 T{-1/2}'s), NaI (120 keV|<E|g 200 keV; 13 T{-1/2}'s), and pc (|b's; 7 and 15 T{-1/2}'s) from 1968Me07) and 3.341 d {I3} (1980Mo26; 7-9 and 17-19 d after {+46}Ca(n,|g); 159|g). See also 1986Re12 
MOMM1,MOME2$AB; Q not corrected for polarization. {+45}Sc standard 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L(p)=2 in (d,{+3}He), ({+3}He,d), and (t,|a). J|p=3/2+ expected from shell model supported by C{+2}S data. 
T weighted av of 270 ns {I12} from |b{+-} decay and 274 ns {I10} from (|a,p|g) 
$|m from (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2 or 11/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g); linear polarization (1147|g) in (|a,p|g) selects 11/2. |p=- from E2 |g to g.s. 
T other: >0.83 ps from DSAM in ({+14}C,p2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J J=5/2 to 9/2 from log| {Ift} in |b{+-} decay. |p=- from L(t,p)=2. |g(|q)(1879|g) in (|a,p|g) excludes 7/2. Ne 5/2 from D+Q |g to 11/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 7/2|<J|<15/2 proposed in (|a,p|g) not adopted by evaluator 
T other: >4.2 ps from DSAM in ({+14}C,p2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J this may be a close doublet with J|<7/2 for one member and |>7/2 for the other. See (|a,p|g) for discussion 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J (13/2 to 17/2) in (|a,p|g) and speculated 13/2- in ({+14}C,p2n|g) not adopted by evaluator 
T other: 0.40 ps {I29} from DSAM in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J,ISPIN |b|g-CP(1297|g) (1967Be20,1965Ma06) indicates that the most likely spin value in the sequence 7/2(|b{+-})J(D,Q)7/2 is J=5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-,9/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q)(2407|g) and RUL's. 9/2+ favored by band structure (1974To05). 
T unweighted av of 0.10 ps {I7} (1974To05) and 0.31 ps {I12} (1972Ba95) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=1.0,1.0 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-0+}) for zero order. {+47}Sc=0.928((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-0+}) - 0.37((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-2+}) - 0.025((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-4+}) for shell model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=2.1 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1d3/2){-3/2+} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-0+}) for zero order. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=0.4,0.9 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-2+}) for zero order. {+47}Sc=0.926((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-2+}) - 0.376((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-4+}) - 0.035((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-6+}) for shell model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=2.8 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 2s1/2){-1/2+} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-0+}) for zero order. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=16.5 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-2+}) for zero order. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=0.9 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1d5/2){-5/2+} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-0+}) for zero order. 
S agreement with other values is purely fortuitous since the 1d5/2+ state is highly fragmented 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=1.6,0.6 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-6+}) for zero order. {+47}Sc=-0.639((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-4+}) + 0.769((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+6}{-6+}) for shell model. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=16.0 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-2+}) for zero order. 
S If {+50}Ti=(({+48}Ca 0+) (0.92(|p 1f7/2){+2}{-0+}) + 0.39(|p 2p3/2){+2}{-0+}) is assumed, |s(exp)/|s(theory)=1.5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$|s(EXP)/|s(THEORY)=2.9 
Transferred nucleons=((|p 1f7/2){-7/2-} (|n 1f7/2){+2}{-0+}) for zero order. 
Evaluator suggests that this may be the IAS of {+47}Ca g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$ from Adopted dataset for {+47}Sc in ENSDF database 
MOMM1$ measured by COLLAPS method (2022Ba15). 
MOME2$ measured by COLLAPS method (2022Ba15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$spin from atomic beam (1976Fu06,1967Re06); parity from L({+3}He,t)=L(d,|a)=6 from 0+; 6+ also from |b|g circular polarization in {+48}Sc |b{+-} decay (1966Va14). 
T$weighted average of 43.67 h {I9} (1969Ra16, |b{+-}), 44.1 h {I3} (1300|g), 43.9 h {I6} and 45.2 h {I15} (175|g) (1963Hi02), 44.0 h {I9} (1959Po64), 43.4 h {I5} (1945Hi04), and 44 h {I1} (1940Wa01, Quartz-fibre electroscope). Other: 43.2 h (1963Ho17). 
MOMM1$from 2007Oh10 using the nuclear magnetic resonance on oriented nuclei (NMR-ON). See also 2019StZV compilation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$from (d,|a). Others: 1095 {I5} from ({+3}He,t), 1091 {I8} from (t,{+3}He), and 1091 {I10} from (d,{+3}He). 
J$from analyzing power in (d,|a),(pol d,|a); L({+3}He,t)=L(d,|a)=6 from from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
J$spin=5 from |g-excit and |g(|q) in (p,n|g); L(t,{+3}He)=4+6 from 0+. Other: (1,2) from (p,n) based on auto-correlation coefficient is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g-excit and |g(|q) in (p,n|g); L(d,{+3}He)=L(t,|a)=0 from 7/2-; L(t,{+3}He)=L(d,|a)=3 from 0+. Other: 3- from comparison of CCBA to |s(|q) in (t,{+3}He) is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-,5-
level_comment:
E$from (d,|a). Others: 2165 {I4} from (p,n), 2158 {I10} from (t,{+3}He), 2164 {I7} from (d,{+3}He), and 2140 {I20} from (t,|a). 
J$L(d,|a)=5 from 0+; 4-,5- from comparison of CCBA to |s(|q) in (t,{+3}He). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$from (p,n). Others: 2390 {I20} from (t,{+3}He), 2360 {I20} from (t,|a). It is likely that this level is the same as the 2390 level in (p,n|g). 
J$from comparison of CCBA to |s(|q) in (t,{+3}He); (2) from auto-correlation coefficient in (p,n). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+,5+)
level_comment:
J$(4,5) from |g-excit and branching ratios in (p,n|g); (4,5)+ from comparison of |s(|q) in {+46}Ca({+3}He,p) to the shapes of the 1+ to 5+ states in ({+3}He,p) for a group at 2682 {I20}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)
level_comment:
J$from |g-excit and branching ratios in (p,n|g). Other: 1+ suggested from d|s/d|W from (p,n) is inconsistent. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3151 {I15} from (|a,d) and 3179 {I10} from ({+3}He,t). 
J$L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+; (3+) from DWBA analysis in (|a,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,t); L(|a,d)=4 from 0+ for a group at 3206 {I15}. Other: L({+3}He,p)=0(+2) for a group at 3232 {I20} is inconsistent. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (p,n). 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0(+2) for a group at 3232 {I20} gives 1+,0+; L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=3,(2) from 0+ for a group at 3270. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (t,{+3}He). Other: 3289 {I15} from (|a,d). 
J$(5+) from DWBA analysis in (|a,d) for a group at 3289 {I15}; L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=3,(2) from 0+ for a group at 3270. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$unweighted average of 3455 {I10} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He) and 3421 {I15} from (t,{+3}He). 
J$L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3,4+
level_comment:
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,t). 
E$weighted average of 3480 {I5} from (p,n) and 3494 {I7} from ({+3}He,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-,1-
level_comment:
J$from comparison of CCBA to |s(|q) in (t,{+3}He). 
E$from (t,{+3}He). Other: 3496 {I5} from (d,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3502 {I20} from ({+3}He,p) and 3520 {I6} from (p,n). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (d,|a). Others: 3688 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 3689 {I15} from (|a,d). 
J$1+ from L({+3}He,p)=0+2 for a group at 3698 {I15}, (2+) from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,t) for a group at 3688 {I10}; (6+) from DWBA analysis in (|a,d); L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=3,(2) from 0+ for a group at 3680 {I10}. Different J|p from different reactions might indicate different levels around this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3708 {I5} from (p,n), 3720 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 3714 {I10} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He), and 3719 {I15} from (t,{+3}He). 
J$L({+3}He,p)=L(t,{+3}He)=0+2 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3820 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 3838 {I7} from (d,|a). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from (p,n), 
J$1+ from (d,2p) for a group at 4.00E3 {I2} and from ({+3}He,p) for a group at 4038 {I20}, (1+) from ({+3}He,t) for a group at 4040 {I10}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4062 {I5} from (p,n) and 4071 {I7} from (d,|a). 
J$see comment for 4024 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4173 {I5} from (p,n), 4169 {I10} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He), and 4159 {I8} from (d,|a). Other: 4171 from ({+3}He,t) 
J$1+ from ({+3}He,p) for a group at 4168 {I15}; (3+) from (|a,d) for a group at 4178 {I15}; L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=0 from 0+ gives 0+,1+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,t). Other: 1+ from ({+3}He,p) for a group at 4168 {I15} and (3+) from (|a,d) for a group at 4178 {I15}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4265 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) and 4236 {I15} from (t,{+3}He). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4290 {I5} from (p,n), 4268 {I20} from (t,{+3}He), and 4288 {I8} from (d,|a). 
J$from d|s/d|W in (d,2p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,0+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4322 {I20} from ({+3}He,p) and 4330 {I10} from ({+3}He,t). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4450 {I15} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He) and 4424 {I15} from (t,{+3}He). 
J$L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=3,(2) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4566 {I15} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He) and 4550 {I20} from (t,{+3}He). 
J$L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5+,6+,7+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$it is probably the same level as the 4682 level seen in ({+3}He,p) and the 4671 level seen in ({+6}Li,{+6}He), but J|p is inconsistent. See 4677 level. 
J$L({+3}He,t)=6 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4682 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4671 {I15} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=3,(2) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$1+ from d|s/d|W in (d,2p) for a group at 4.76E3 {I2}; L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=3,(2) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4778 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4790 {I10} from ({+3}He,t). 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; also from d|s/d|W in (p,n). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5028 {I20} from ({+3}He,p) and 5003 {I15} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p); L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5208 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5190 {I20} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p); L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5290 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) and 5318 {I20} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5342 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 5360 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 5318 {I20} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5422 {I25} from ({+3}He,p) and 5440 {I10} from ({+3}He,t). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5512 {I20} from ({+3}He,p), 5485 {I20} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He), 5520 {I10} from ({+3}He,t). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p); L({+3}He,t)=(2,3) from 0+; L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5608 {I20} from ({+3}He,p) and 5574 {I25} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$from DWBA analysis in ({+3}He,p); L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=2,(3) from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5742 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5760 {I10} from ({+3}He,t). 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+,1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5960 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) and 5975 {I25} from ({+6}Li,{+6}He). 
J$L({+6}Li,{+6}He)=0 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$IAS({+48}Ca g.s.). See 1997Jo08 for parameters of the isovector potential deduced from |s(|q) of {+48}Ca(p,n) E=35 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). Other: 16810 {I5} from (p,n). 
J$from DWIA and DWBA analysis of |s(|q) in (p,n),(pol p,n). 
$T=4 Gamow-Teller state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>1.6|*10{+20} y (2002Bb03; 90% C.L.) to this state. Theory: 1.5|*10{+29} y|<T{-1/2}(|b{+-})|<1.3|*10{+31} y (1999Au05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>2.5|*10{+20} y (2002Bb03; 90% C.L.) to this state. Theory: 1.1|*10{+21} y {I+8-6} (1999Au05). 7.6|*10{+20} y {I53} (1985Wa14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>1.9|*10{+20} y (2002Bb03; 90% C.L.) to this state? unlikely to be fed since the feeding would be fourth-forbidden nonunique with Q(|b{+-})=30 {I5} (evaluator). Theory: 8.8|*10{+23} y|<T{-1/2}(|b{+-})|<5.2|*10{+28} y (1999Au05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 631 {I20} (1965Ch16), 628 {I6} (1967Mc07), and 624 {I5} (1968Mc10) 
J$other: (3,4) from 1967Mc08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$from 1986An23 
$Results consistent with description as "stretched" particle-hole state (1985An06,1981Wa08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=6.80 
E$weighted average of 2502 {I20} (1965Ch16), 2508 {I4} (1967Mc07), and 2518 {I4} (1968Mc10). Other: 2520 (1986An23) 
J$other: (0) from 1967Mc08 is discrepant 
$B(>{+-})=1.328 {I159} (2004Ra26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=0.25 
E$weighted average of 3021 {I6} (1967Mc07) and 3025 {I4} (1968Mc10). Other: 3020 (2004Ra26) 
$B(>{+-})=0.049 {I18} (2004Ra26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=0.36 
E$weighted average of 3146 {I4} (1967Mc07) and 3152 {I4} (1968Mc10). Other: 3170 (2004Ra26) 
$B(>{+-})=0.070 {I26} (2004Ra26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=0.58 
E$weighted average of 3705 {I10} (1967Mc07) and 3709 {I5} (1968Mc10). Other: 3690 (2004Ra26) 
J$d|s/d|W suggests J|p|=1+ (2004Ra26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=0.17 
E$from 1968Mc10. Other: 4139 {I10} (1967Mc07), 4140 (2004Ra26) 
$B(>{+-})=0.032 {I12} (2004Ra26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$from 1986An23 
$IAS({+48}Ca g.s.). See 1997Jo08 for parameters of the isovector potential deduced from |s(|q) of {+48}Ca(p,n) E=35 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$from 1980An19 (relative to 2.52-MeV state) 
J$from analysis of |s(|q) (1980An19). 
$Interpreted as T=4 Gamow-Teller state (1980An19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Suggested by 1971Ro27. Existence considered extremely doubtful by 1975As07: see footnote on 2062|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_comment:
E$others: 131 (1980Ga04,1969Sc20), 130 (1978Ta23), 130 {I30} (1969Br04). 
J$also from 1980Ga04, 1970Oh01, 1969Sc20 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E$others: 252 (1980Ga04), 250 (1978Ta23), 250 {I30} (1969Br04), 256 (1969Sc20). 
J$also from 1980Ga04, 1978Ta23, 1970Oh01, 1969Br04, 1969Sc20 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 610 {I10} (2007Gr22), 624 {I4} (1970Oh01), and 620 {I30} (1969Br04). Others: 623 (1980Ga04), 620 (1978Ta23), 624 (1969Sc20). 
J$also from 2007Gr22, 1980Ga04, 1970Oh01, 1969Br04, 1969Sc20 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_comment:
E$others: 1096 (1980Ga04), 1080 {I30} (1969Br04), 1097 (1969Sc20); not separated from 1143 level (1980Ga04,1978Ta23). 
J$also from 1970Oh01 and 1969Sc20. 1969Br04 assign 7+ to 1140 and 2+ to 1080 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1390 {I10} (2007Gr22) and 1400 {I10} (1970Oh01). Other: 1406 (1972Ri07). 
J$also from 2007Gr22 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2530 {I10} (2007Gr22), 2526 {I5} (1970Oh01), and 2510 {I30} (1969Br04). others: 2520 (2006Fr03,1980Ga04,1969Sc20), 2520 (1978Ta23) 
J$also from 2007Gr22, 2006Fr03, 1980Ga04, 1970Oh01, 1969Br04, 1969Sc20 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$other: 2978 (1972Ri07), possible doublet. 
J$from |g(|q) and transition strength in 2007Gr22. Other: 1+,4+,5+ from 1972Ri07; 10% contribution from J|p=(2,3)+ (2007Gr22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$others: 3070 {I10} (2007Gr22), 3061 (1972Ri07), 3040 {I30} (1969Br04), 3074 (1969Sc20). 
J$from 2007Gr22. Other: (5+) from 1969Br04; 10% contribution from J|p=(2,3)+ (2007Gr22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3342 {I7} (1970Oh01) and 3320 {I30} (1969Br04). Others: 3327 (1972Ri07, possible doublet), 3304 (1969Sc20). 
J$3+ from 1969Br04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3,4+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3495 {I7} (1970Oh01) and 3470 {I30} (1969Br04). Others: 3480 (1972Ri07), 3486 (1969Sc20). 
J$4+ from 1969Br04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3690 {I10} (1970Oh01) and 3670 {I30} (1969Br04). Others: 3665 (1972Ri07), 3670 (1969Sc20). 
J$from 1969Br04 and 1969Sc20 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$IAS of {+48}Ca g.s. Others: 6670 (1980Ga04), 6680 (1978Ta23), 6667 (1972Ri07), 6680 {I30} (1969Br04), 6680 (1969Sc20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$energy from 1980An19 or 1980Ga04; very weakly populated relative to other 1+ states in this reaction (at least a factor of 2 less than the 2989 state) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$could consist of a 1+ state of intensity similar to that of the 2989 and a state with J|>2 (1985Aj03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=19.1 {I23} 
$Strongest G-T transition in ({+3}He,t) is correlated with the weakest one in (d,2p) (2006Fr03). 
$B(>{++})=0.014 {I5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=161.0 {I66} 
$Barely observed in ({+3}He,t) (2006Fr03) 
$B(>{++})=0.192 {I46} for 2.98 and 3.05 MeV doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J L=3 in (d,n),({+3}He,d),(|A,t).... Empirical shape of A(|q) in (pol d,{+3}He) 
T weighted av of 57.15 min {I20} (1969Fl02; 4|p|b, Si(Li), chem), 57.5 min {I1} (1961Re06; mag spect, scin, chem), and 57.00 min 18 (1969Ra16; isotope sep, |a(P)); mean of 57.26 min {I10} (NRM) and 57.11 min {I13} (RT) with |DT{-1/2} from RM. 1969Fl02 and 1961Re06 used {+49}Ca |b{+-} decay for production while 1969Ra16 used U(p,X) E=0.59, 18 GeV. Others: see 1978Ha15. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J assumed to Be L=1 member of 1+4 doublet in (d,n),({+3}He,d),(|a,t).... J=1/2 from |g(|q) in (p,X|g) IAR: {+49}Ca g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
May correspond to 11525 state if L(d,n),({+3}He,d),(|a,t) incorrect 
J L=(3,4) in (d,n),({+3}He,d),(|a,t)... 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E weighted av (int.) of 15107 {I10} from {+48}Ca(p,X): other {+49}Ca IAR's and 15105 {I12} from ({+3}He,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J L=4 in (d,n),({+3}He,d),(|a,t)... and (p,p). (p,p') to {+48}Ca 4507, 3-, indicates pure |pp{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J L(p,p)=4. (p,p') to {+48}Ca 4507, 3-, indicates pure |pp{-3/2}; to {+48}Ca 5729, 5-, indicates pure |pp{-1/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Possible candidate for a pairing-vibrational state. |s(|q) resembles that for the {+51}Sc g.s. but not that for the {+49}Sc g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J from comparison of A(|q) to those of (pol d,{+3}He) leading 7/2-, g.s., in {+41}Sc and {+55}Co (1985Ha08) 
S other: C{+2}S=0.58 {I3} (1985Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J from comparison of A(|q) to those of (pol d,{+3}He) involving the same J|p transfer leading to the {+59}Cu g.s. and excited states in {+55}Co (1985Ha08) 
S other: C{+2}S=0.43 {I2} (1985Ha08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
Interference effects between one- and two-step processes expected for this and the following states since they lie close to the energy predicted for the multiplet of (({+48}Ca 2+)(|p,1f{-7/2})). Calculations by 1980Fo12 inconclusive. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
1980Fo12 indicate that this and the following state are the same; however, L(({+3}He,d))|=L((|a,t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J likely interference between direct and two-step processes. (({+48}Ca 3-{-1}) (|p 1f{-7/2}))1/2+. See comment on preceding state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S 1980Fo11 also give C{+2}S (0.03-0.17) for this and the following L=(1), (1,2), and (3,4) states assuming J=L-1/2 for odd L and J=L+1/2 for even L 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=1.68 
S |s(exp)/|s(DWBA)({+15}N g.s.)=1.07 {I11} and 0.89 {I9}; |s(exp)/|s(DWBA)({+15}N 6.32 MeV)=1.14 {I11} and 1.36 {I14} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=0.50 
E from ({+15}N,{+14}C) (1975He01). Not observed in ({+16}O,{+15}N) by 1978Ko01. States above this energy not observed in ({+15}N,{+14}C) (1975He01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J,T$ from Adopted dataset for {+49}Sc in ENSDF database 
MOMM1$ measured by |b-NMR method at milli-K temperatures 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J$ from Adopted dataset for {+49}Sc in ENSDF database 
MOMM1$ measured by COLLAPS method (2022Ba15). Other: 5.540 {I11} measured with CLS method (2022Ba15). 
MOME2$ measured by COLLAPS method (2022Ba15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$L(t,{+3}He)=4+6; allowed |b{+-} feeding to 6+ (log {Ift}=5.4); L({+3}He,p)=L(|a,d)=4 
T$from 1970Wa29 (1121|g decay curve, main uncertainty is systematic, as the statistical uncertainty is stated by authors only as 0.2 s). Others: 1.72 min {I4} (1963Ka16), 1.80 min {I20} (1959Po64), 1.74 min {I4} (1955Mo71), 1963Ch03. Previous values are in agreement but much less precise as compared to that in 1970Wa29. 
$Measured strong absorption radii=1.43 fm{+2} {I10} at 40.57 MeV/nucleon {+50}Sc beam, 1.39 fm{+2} {I8} at 90 MeV/nucleon (1999Ai02), 1.07 fm{+2} {I7} at 62.2 MeV/nucleon (1997Li15). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from (1519|g)(71|g)(|q) in |b{+-} decay (2017Ga25); L({+3}He,p)=2 
T$from |g(t) in IT decay 
$Upper limit of %|b{+-} estimated in 2017Ga25 in {+50}Ca |b{+-} decay study from examining |g-intensities in {+50}Sc and {+50}Ti 
%IT,%B-$others: I|b(to {+50}Ti 1554)<2.5% from {+50}Ti 1554|g, <5% from |b|g-coin (1984Al18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=3 from (1519|g)(71|g)(|q) in |b{+-} decay (2017Ga25); L({+3}He,p)=2; and L(t,{+3}He)=2+4 
T$from |g|g(t) in |b{+-} decay (2017Ga25). Other: <10 ns from |b|g(t) (1984Al18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(|a,d)=0 from 0+; L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; allowed |b{+-} feeding from 0+ parent (log| {Ift}=4.1) 
T$from |b|g(t) in |b{+-} decay (2017Ga25) using generalized centroid difference method. Other: <10 ns from |b|g(t) (1984Al18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=146 {I25} 
E$258 {I5} (1969Oh01), 330 {I30} (1969La02,doublet 258+330), 230 {I20} (1970Sc22), 255 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
J$2+ (1969Oh01,1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=280 {I40} 
E$330 {I5} (1969Oh01), 330 {I30} (1969La02,doublet 258+330), 300 {I20} (1970Sc22), 325 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
J$(3+) (1969Oh01,1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=86 {I14} 
E$756 {I8} (1969Oh01), 773 {I30} (1969La02), 740 {I20} (1970Sc22), 755 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
J$(4+) (1969Oh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=610 {I60} 
E$1854 {I5} (1969Oh01), 1848 {I30} (1969La02), 1840 {I20} (1970Sc22), 1850 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
J$1+ (1969Oh01,1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=250 {I25} 
E$2227 {I5} (1969Oh01), 2211 {I30} (1969La02), 2220 {I20} (1970Sc22), 2222 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
J$(3+) (1969Oh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=124 {I12} 
E$2331 {I8} (1969Oh01), 2331 {I30} (1969La02), 2320 {I20} (1970Sc22), 2320 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
J$(4+) (1969Oh01,1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=110 {I25} 
E$3090 {I5} (1969Oh01), 3065 {I30} (1969La02), 3090 {I20} (1970Sc22), 3085 {I10} (1972Fl01) 
E$anti-analog state (1971Ha55) 
J$0+ (1969Oh01,1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=318 {I32} 
E$3259 {I7} (1969Oh01), 3264 {I30} (1969La02, doublet 3259+3287), 3260 {I20} (1970Sc22), 3260 {I20} (1972Fl01) 
J$(2+) (1969Oh01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$3287 {I5} (1969Oh01), 3264 {I30} (1969La02, doublet 3259+3287), 3290 {I20} (1970Sc22), 3290 {I20} (1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=378 {I38} 
J$1+ (1972Fl01) 
E$3682 {I5} (1969Oh01), 3658 {I30} (1969La02, triplet 3617+3682+3731), 3680 {I20} (1970Sc22), 3670 {I20} (1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=378 {I38} 
J$1+ (1972Fl01) 
E$(3943 {I10}) (1969Oh01), 3913 {I30} (1969La02), 3940 {I20} (1970Sc22), 3920 {I20} (1972Fl01) 
E$3913 {I30} group in 1969La02 and 3940 {I20} group in 1970Sc22 are associated with 3920 {I20} in 1972Fl01 based on |s(|q) data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=310 {I31} 
E$4236 {I30} (1969La02), (4240 {I20}) (1970Sc22), 4230 {I20} (1972Fl01) 
$Total cross section for 4232+4311 groups 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=548 {I55} 
J$1+ (1972Fl01) 
E$4640 {I7} (1969Oh01), 4641 {I30} (1969La02), 4630 {I20} (1970Sc22), 4630 {I20} (1972Fl01) 
L$2 (1969La02) for 4641+4748 
$Total cross section for 4638+4729 groups 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=276 {I40} 
J$1+ (1972Fl01) 
E$4879 {I7} (1969Oh01), 4880 {I30} (1969La02), 4870 {I20} (1970Sc22), 4860 {I20} (1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=540 {I54} 
E$5073 {I10} (1969Oh01), 5066 {I30} (1969La02, doublet 4980+5073), 5080 {I20} (1970Sc22), 5060 {I20} (1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$5290 {I20} (1970Sc22), 5270 {I20} (1972Fl01, doublet) 
J$|s(|q) shows forward-angle dependence typical of 1+ transitions (1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|s(|mb)=264 {I50} 
E$5599 {I30} (1969La02), 5630 {I20} (1970Sc22), 5600 {I20} (1972Fl01) 
J$0+ or 1+ (1972Fl01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$4333 in 1994Fi01 seems a composite of 4280 and 4420 in 1969Mo18 
J$1994Fi01 propose 8- based on |s(|q) for 4333 group 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from (1519|g)(71|g)(|q) (2017Ga25) 
$Upper limit of %|b{+-} estimated in 2017Ga25 from examining |g-intensities in {+50}Sc and {+50}Ti 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=3 from (1519|g)(71|g)(|q) (2017Ga25) 
T$upper limit is based on the sensitivity of the experimental setup, as no non-prompt component was seen by LaBr{-3} detectors (2017Ga25). Other: <10 ns from |b|g(t) (1984Al18, authors obtained 5 ns {I2}, but cited an upper limit of 10 ns as possible systematic uncertainties were not properly monitored) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$upper limit obtained using generalized centroid difference method in |b|g-coin data (2017Ga25). Other: <10 ns from |b|g(t) (1984Al18, authors obtained 5 ns {I2}, but cited an upper limit of 10 ns as possible systematic uncertainties were not properly monitored) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J |p=- from log| {Ift}=5.214 {I17} to 5/2-, J=(7/2) from L=(3) and shell model in {+48}Ca(|a,p). 
T from |g multiscaling in 1976Da16. Other: 12.5 s {I1} (1966Bi09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J E2 |g to (7/2)-, L=(5) in {+48}Ca(|a,p) 
T$ from recoil-distance Doppler-shift method (RDDS, 2009Va06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J from the observed feedings with log| {If{+1u}t}<8.5 to the 2+ and the 4+ states in {+52}Ti. 
T inferred from the {+52}Sc-{+52}Ti |b{+-} decay rate of 1050, 1214, 1268, and 1382 keV transitions in {+52}Ti (1985Hu03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7-,8+)
level_comment:
$ Configuration=|pf{-7/2}~#|n(p{-3/2}{+2}f{-5/2}) or |pf{-7/2}~#|n(p{-3/2}{+3}~#3- octupole vibration) (2009Bh02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7-,8+)
level_comment:
$ Configuration=|pf{-7/2}~#|n(p{-3/2}{+2}f{-5/2}) or |pf{-7/2}~#|n(p{-3/2}{+3}~#3- octupole vibration) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from ({+53}Sc)|b|g correlated decay curve (2010Cr02). Other: |>3 s (1998So03, earlier value of 0.7 s {i9} in 1995SoZX) 
J$from systematics. Configuration=|pf{-7/2}~#|np{-3/2}{+4} 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=0.24 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
$ Most strongly populated excited state, which serves as collector of |?60% of total feeding from higher {Isd} excited states 
$ 2p{-3/2} state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
$ 1f{-7/2} state 
$Summed (inclusive) measured |s=17.6 mb {I6} for one-proton knockout reaction, out of which direct feeding of g.s. is estimated as |s |<6.7 mb {I18}. Remaining |s=10.9 mb {I17} is attributed to the excited states in the {Isd} shell. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
Mass excess=-34.4 MeV {I5} (1994Se12). Mass excess=-33.5 MeV {I5} (1990Tu01). 
T from 2010Cr02. Others: 360 ms {I60} (2004Li75) and 225 ms {I40} (1998So03). 
J from 2004Li75 based on the |b{+-} decay of {+54}Sc, which populates the 2+ and 4+ excited states in the {+54}Ti daughter. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T from 2010Cr02. Others: 2.78 |ms {I+31-25} (2012Ba36) nonpopulation of |b-decay, 4+ from configuration mixing. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J from log| {Ift}=4.25 in {+54}Ca (J|p=0+) |b{+-} decay and by configuration=(|p 1f{-3/2}){+1}~#(n,1f5/2,1) (2012Cr02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n in 2010Cr02 is not directly measured, but estimated from missing |b-feeding intensity in {+55}Sc decay, where absolute |g intensities (per 100 decays) were measured 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=27.4 ms, %|b{+-}n=15 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=88.7 ms, %|b{+-}n=2.8, 2.2 (2021Mi17). 
T$from 2010Cr02 (summed |g-decay curve fitted with a single exponential and constant background; earlier measurements from the same lab and by some of the same authors using implants-|b correlated decay curves: 115 ms {I15} in 2004Li75, 103 ms {I7} in 2002Sh43, and 83 ms {I3} in 2008Ma01). Other: 120 ms {I40} (1998So03, from implants-|b correlated events, statistics was weak in this first paper on the identification of {+55}Sc nuclide, where 42 events were assigned to {+55}Sc). Evaluator adopts T{-1/2} from 2010Cr02 due to the highest statistics and better selectivity from |g-decay curves. Weighted average of all five values is 93 ms {I4} with reduced |h{+2}=4.5, higher than critical |h{+2}=2.4 at 95% confidence level; NRM weighted averaging gives 95 ms {+3} with acceptable reduced |h{+2}; while unweighted average is 103 ms {I7}, same value suggested in LWM weighted average. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.29 |ms {I2} (2020Mi13) and 0.290 |ms {I30} (2010Cr02, fitting the implant correlated isomeric transition decay curve to a single exponential function with a constant background). Others: 0.35 |ms {I+26-12} (2012Ka36, implants-|g correlated decay); <20 |ms (2004Li75, time window selected by 2004Li75 for the observation of isomeric transitions in correlation with implanted nuclei) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=16.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=10, %|b{+-}2n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=51.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=2.6, 2.9; %|b{+-}2n=0.17, 0.12 (2021Mi17). 
E,J$shell-model calculations (2004Li75) predict 1+ as ground state from |p1f{-7/2}~#|n1f{-5/2} configuration. (1+) is also supported by apparent large (probably allowed) |b feedings to g.s. and first 2+ states in {+56}Ti (2010Cr02) 
T$from timing of b-correlated 751|g and 1712|g (2010Cr02). Other: 35 ms {I5} (2004Li75, from |b decay curve also, 38 ms {I5} in 2004Li12, also 2005Ma93). 2010Cr02 and 2004Li75 are from the same laboratory with some of the same authors 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5+,6+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
$Observation of 591.7 {I3} (I|g=14% {I2}) and 1203.5 {I3} (I|g=8% {I1}) |g rays from the decay of longer-live activity of {+56}Sc to {+55}Ti confirms |b-delayed-neutron decay of 75-ms activity of {+56}Sc (2010Cr02). Authors give %|b{+-}n|>14 {I2}, probably considering other possible delayed |b-delayed-neutron branches. This value is in approximate agreement with theoretical %|b{+-}n=10 from 2019Mo01 for the ground state decay. 
E,J$shell-model calculations (2004Li75) predict 6+ at 543 keV from |p1f{-7/2}~#|n1f{-5/2} configuration. 2004Li75 (also 2005Ma93) proposed (6+,7+). However, 2010Cr02 (from the same group as 2004Li75) proposed (5+,6+) from apparent large (probably allowed) |b feeding of 6+ state in {+56}Ti, and apparent |b feeding of 4+ state in {+56}Ti, although, for the latter, there is possibility of missing |g transitions from higher levels feeding the 4+ state in {+56}Ti. 
T$from timing of b-correlated 691|g and 1161|g (2010Cr02). Other: 60 ms {I7} (2004Li75, from |b-correlated |g decay curve). 2010Cr02 and 2004Li75 are from the same laboratory with some of the same authors 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n=33, %|b{+-}2n=0.6 (calculated,1997Mo25) 
J$ 7/2- proposed from systematics (2003Au02) and calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$ measured in 2005Ga01 (also 2003So21) 
$ Production cross section determined to be 10 nb, with a systematic error estimated to be 30% (1997Be70). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
E$ the 12-ms activity is assumed to belong to the g.s. of {+58}Sc. 
T$ from |b(fragment) timing correlations of seven implanted events (2005Ga01,2003So21) 
J$ (3+) proposed from systematics (2003Au02) 
$Calculated delayed-neutron decay modes: %|b{+-}n=19, %|b{+-}2n=1.2 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=1620 ns {I270} from (412.5+580.0)|g(t) (2021Wi05). Other: 1710 ns {I350} from 412.5|g(t) and 1120 ns {I300} from 580.0|g(t) (2021Wi05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$ Measured cross section=9|*10{+10} mb {I+1-2} (estimated from figure 2 of 2009Ta05). 
E$ Fragment observed by 2009Ta05 is assumed to be in the ground state of {+59}Sc. 
J$ 7/2- (syst,2012Au07), 7/2- (predicted,1997Mo25) 
T$ Lower limit can be estimated from time-of-flight of |?360 ns as in 2005St29 (from the same lab as 2009Ta05). Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by systematics value of 10 ms (>620 ns) (2012Au07) and calculated value of 7.1 ms (1997Mo25) 
$Calculated (1997Mo25) populations of daughter nuclides: 51% for {+59}Ti, 47% for {+58}Ti through |b{+-}n decay and 1.5% for {+57}Ti through |b{+-}2n decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Measured production cross section 
E$ activity observed by 2009Ta05 is assumed to correspond to the ground state of {+60}Sc. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$|b{+-} is the only possible decay mode, followed by |b-delayed neutron emissions, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference, although, no radiation from the decay of {+61}Sc has yet been observed. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=5.4 ms, %|b{+-}n=46.1, %|b{+-}2n=1.3, %|b{+-}3n=2.3, %|b{+-}4n=0.0 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=8.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=94.4, %|b{+-}2n=1.4, %|b{+-}3n=1.0 (2016Ma12) 
$Measured cross section=8 fb {I+14-5} for Be target and 74 fb {I+133-56} for W target (data supplied by O. Tarasov in e-mail reply of Nov 11, 2009, corresponding to Fig. 2 in 2009Ta05 and Fig. 8 in 2009Ta24) 
E$fragments observed by 2009Ta05 and 2009Ta24 are assumed to be in the ground state of {+61}Sc. 
J$7/2 predicted by 1997Mo25 and 1995Ri05, and 7/2- from systematics (2017Au03) 
T$half-life of the decay of {+61}Sc has not yet been measured. T{-1/2}>650 ns from time-of-flight of 620-650 ns, given in e-mail reply of Sept 23, 2009 from O. Tarasov. From a general decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number, T{-1/2} for {+61}Sc g.s. is expected to be <10 ms, based on measured half-lives of 12 ms for {+58}Sc, 22 ms for {+57}Sc, 26 ms {I6} for {+56}Sc, and 96 ms for {+55}Sc available in the ENSDF and/or XUNDL database (as of March 25, 2019). 2017Au03 give 2 ms from systematic trend 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, accompanied by delayed neutron decays, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$A total of two events were assigned to {+62}Sc, with tuned setting of the spectrometer for {+60}Ca (2018Ta17) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=4.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=27, %|b{+-}2n=33, %|b{+-}3n=1.0, %|b{+-}4n=0.0, %|b{+-}5n=0.0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b)=7.0 ms, %|b{+-}n=71.1, 79.6; %|b{+-}2n=21.8, 13.4; %|b{+-}3n=1.26, 0.78; %|b{+-}4n=0.032, 0.008; %|b{+-}5n=0 (2021Mi17, two values for a decay mode refer to different fission barriers). 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to the ground-state activity. 
T$half-life of the {+62}Sc activity has not been measured. It is expected to be greater than the time-of-flight through the beam transport system, which may be about 500 ns. From systematics of half-lives of neighboring Sc isotopes, the half-life is expected to be <10 ms from 12 ms for {+58}Sc, 13 ms for {+57}Sc, 26 ms for {+56}Sc and 105 ms for {+55}Sc, assuming a decreasing trend of half-life as neutron number increases in neutron-rich nuclei. From systematics, T{-1/2}=2 ms in 2021Ko07. 
J$1 or 8 from |W(p)=7/2 and |W(neutron)=9/2 (2019Mo01, theory) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$from estimate of cross section for {+38}Ti in comparison with production trends for other nuclides such as {+58}Ni (1996Bl21). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|ep+%|e2P=100 
T$from 2007Do17. Others: 31 ms {I+6-4} (2001Gi01), 26 ms {I+8-7} (1990De43) 
J$from systematics (1992Mo15,2017Au03) 
$Delayed-2 proton decay observed by 1992Mo15; %|ep=93.7 {I28} reported in 2007Do17. From systematics, %|ep=85 {I15}; %|e2p=15 (2017Au03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{++} delayed |g activity in {+40}Sc <3% from integrated |b strength of 99.0% {I16} (1998Bh12) and 101% {I5} (1998Li46). No |b{++} delayed |g activity was seen by 1998Li46. 2007Do07 report a transition with E|g=2467.3 {I5} and absolute I|g=8.5 {I54} in {+39}Ca from its first excited state. 
%ECP$other: 2007Do17 report 95.8 {I13}, which gives I|g=4.2 {I13} for |g transitions in {+40}Sc presumably ending up feeding the {+40}Sc ground state. 
T$from 2007Do17. Others: 53.5 ms {I25} (2001Gi01,2001Gi02), 52.7 ms {I15} (reported in 1998Bh12 as the average of 53.6 ms {I6} from an independent analysis of the same data in 1997Tr11, and 51.7 ms {I6} in 1997Tr11), 54 ms {I2} (1998Li46, 55 ms {I2} in 1997Li25), and 56 ms {I+18-12} (1990De43) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|ep: from 1974Se11. 
J$log{Ift}=4.8 to 1/2+ and 5.0 to 5/2+ in {+41}Ti |e decay 
T$Weighted average of 82.6 ms {I5} (2007Do17), 81.3 ms {I20} (1998Bh12), 82 ms {I3} (1998Li46), 80.1 ms {I9} (1997Tr11), 81 ms {I4} (1996Fa09), 80 ms {I2} (1974Se11). Others: 88 ms {I1} (1966Po12), 90.5 ms {I20} (1964Re08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 211.7 ms {I19} (2015Mo01, from analysis of |b-decay and correlated implantations), 209.5 ms {I52} (2015Mo01, from the analysis of |g-ray data), 208.14 ms {I45} (2009Ku19, also 2011KuZY, from decay timing of positrons emitted by a pure {+42}Ti source deposited on a mylar tape and counted by a 4|p cylindrical plastic scintillator, source production used Penning-trap system; uncertainty increased by evaluators by a factor of 2), 230 ms {I50} (1972Zi02, |b counting), 202 ms {I5} (1969Ga27, |g counting), and 200 ms {I20} (1969Ni03, |g counting), 250 ms {I40} (1962Ob03). Other: 173 ms {I14} (1969Al12, |b counting) seems discrepant as compared to all the other values. 2015Ha07 review gives T{-1/2}=208.09 ms {I55} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from mean lifetime |t=0.63 ps 16 as weighted average of |t=0.56 ps {I16} (1973Ha10), 0.75 ps {I30} (1973Co38), 0.53 ps {I24} (1971BrYK), 0.49 ps {I21} (1971FoZV), 1.7 ps {I4} (1971Bo23). 2001Ra27 evaluation gives |t=0.56 ps 15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
E$x|?5.2 MeV or 6.6 MeV (2012Au08). From simulations studies and in comparison with the experimental results, 2012Au08 show that two protons do not share equally the 2p decay energy of 4363 keV {I19} (2007Do17) and are emitted in sequence. A ratio of 34%-66% between the two protons is in good agreement with experimental data in 2012Au08. In addition the angular correlation measured between the two protons in 2012Au08 shows an isotropic distribution of the relative angle between the two protons which is a signature of sequential emission. 2012Au08 conclude that |b{++}-delayed emission of protons proceeds in a sequential process via an intermediate state in {+42}Ti at either 5.2 or 6.6 MeV in {+42}Ti. As the level density is quite high in this energy region, no definite level energy can be assigned 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
MOMM1$|b-NMR in Pt (1993Ma67,1993Ma72,1992Ma63) 
J$log| {Ift}=3.56 to 7/2- g.s. of {+43}Sc (super-allowed transition). Mirror state of 7/2-, g.s. in {+43}Sc 
T$from |b activity in 1987Ho14. Others: 0.58 s {I4} (1948Sc20), 0.58 s (1954Ty33), 0.56 s {I2} (1961Ja22), 0.528 s {I3} (1960Ja12), 0.50 s {I2} (1962Pl02), 0.40 s {I5} (1963Va37), 0.49 s {I1} (1967Al08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$(3/2+) proposed in ({+3}He,{+6}He) from similarity of |s(|q) pattern of 3/2+ states, all believed to be from d{-3/2} orbit, in {+39}Ca, {+47}Cr, {+51}Fe and {+55}Ni. Possible mirror state of 150, 3/2+ level in {+43}Sc 
T$weighted average of 11.7 |ms {I3} (2011Ho02) and 12.6 |ms {I6} (1978Me15), both from |g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
E$population of this level in (|a,n|g) is uncertain. From energy matching, the strong group in ({+3}He,{+6}He) may correspond to 1022.4 from (|a,n|g) (as proposed in 1990En08) but proposed J|p assignments (1/2+ for 998 in ({+3}He,{+6}He) and 5/2+ for 1022 in (|a,n|g)) disfavor this correspondence 
J$(1/2+) proposed in ({+3}He,{+6}He) from similarity of |s(|q) pattern of 1/2+ states, all believed to be from d3/2 orbit, in {+39}Ca, {+47}Cr, {+51}Fe and {+55}Ni 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,t)=(5) suggests 7/2- to 13/2-. 11/2- is supported by yrast sequence (19/2-) - (15/2-) - (11/2-) - 7/2 and probable mirror state of 11/2-, 1830 level in {+43}Sc 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,t)=7 suggests 11/2- to 17/2-. 15/2- is supported by |g from (19/2-) in an yrast sequence and probable mirror state of 15/2-, 2987 level in {+43}Sc 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$TDPAD (1978Ha07) 
MOME2$TDPAD (1981Da06; original value of 0.30 {I7} re-evaluated to 0.33 {I8} by 2013StZZ 
J$from agreement of experimental |m with that calculated from shell-model with configuration=|n(f{-7/2}{+3}+f{-7/2}{+2}f{-5/2}). Probable mirror state of (19/2-), 3123 level in {+43}Sc with T{-1/2}=472 ns {I4} 
T$weighted average of 551 ns {I7} (2011Ho02), 560 ns {I6} (1978Ha07), 553 ns {I21} (1981Da06), 560 ns {I35} (1978Me09); from |g(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$measured by 2011Ho02, |g(t). Adopted value of 11.9 |ms {i3} is given in 2011Ho02 based on averaging current value with literature value taken from ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2011Ho02, |g(t). Adopted value of 556 ns {I5} is given in 2011Ho02 based on averaging current value with literature value taken from ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
$Evaluated (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=3.6115 fm {I51} (2013An02 evaluation) 
$Evaluated change in charge radius |d<r{+2}>({+44}Ti,{+48}Ti)=+0.143 fm{+2} {I37} (2013An02) 
T$weighted average of 58.9 y {I3} (2006Ah10,timing distribution of ratio of 1157|g from {+44}Ti decay and 1173|g from {+60}Co decay, weighted average of 8 measurements at Argonne and two at Hebrew university; earlier value from the same group is 59.0 y {I6} (1998Ah03)), 59 y {I2} (2001Ha21, specific activity method by counting implanted {+44}Ti fragments and |g counting of individual and sum peaks), 60.7 y {I12} (1999Wi01, time distribution of |g activity), 60.3 y {I13} (1998Go05, specific activity method with |g counting), 62 y {I2} (1998No06, time distribution of |g activity, preliminary value from the same group is 63 y {I3} (1997No06)). Reduced |h{+2}=1.3. Following result have not been included in the averaging procedure either due to their being outliers or imprecise: 39.0 y {I18} and 58 y {I10} (1996Me22,specific activity and |g counting), 66.6 y {I16} (1990Al11,timing distribution of ratio of |b activities from {+44}Ti, {+36}Cl and {+207}Bi), and 54.2 y {I21} (1983Fr27, specific activity with accelerator mass spectroscopy) 48.2 y 9 (1965Mo07, specific activity method) and 46.4 y 17 (1965Wi05, specific activity method). Inclusion of results from 1990Al11 and 1983Fr27 gives 59.3 y {I7} with reduced |h{+2}=2.7 and increased uncertainties (0.5 for 2006Ah10, and 3.0 for 1990Al11). 2020Br05 measured decay rate of {+44}Ti during 5-hour interval following the detection of the first gravitational wave signal from binary neutron star inspiral (GW170817) detected by Advanced LIGO and Advanced VIRGO in 2017, and found no correlation, contradicting previous claims of detection of a 2.5|s correlation. 2018An10 measured decay rate of {+44}Ti over 84 h around the two correlated solar flares in September 2017, and within 2|s found no correlation. 2020TuZW described a generalized gamma simulator built from the GEANT4 toolkit in connection with T{-1/2} of {+44}Ti decay 
$Measured charge radius (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=3.6185 fm {I38} (2004Ga34, 2002Ca47, collinear laser spectroscopy). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1083.08|g E2 to 0+. 
T$unweighted average of 1.86 ps {I17} from ({+23}Na,2np|g) by RDDS; 3.1 ps {I8} from (|a,|g) E=res by DSAM; 2.75 ps {I20} from DSAM in {+12}C({+40}Ca,{+8}Be). Weighted average is 2.58 ps {I27} with large reduced |h{+2} of 6.3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,d)=4 from 0+; 1371.2|g E2, |DJ=2 to 2+ 
T$weighted average of 0.423 ps {I35} from DSAM in ({+6}Li,pn|g); 0.42 ps {I7} from DSAM (|a,|g) E=res; 0.451 ps {I42} from DSAM in {+12}C({+40}Ca,{+8}Be). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,d)=2 from 0+; 2530.86|g E2, |DJ=2 to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 0.97 ps {I14} from DSAM (|a,|g) E=res; 1.14 ps {I21} from DSAM in {+12}C({+40}Ca,{+8}Be). 
MOMM1$transient-magnetic field method (2003Sc19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,d)=3 from 0+; |DJ=3 to 0+ in (|a,|g). Other: L(p,t)=(2) for a group at 3175 is inconsistent 
T$from RDDS in ({+6}Li,pn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$(2,3) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g); 3+ from assignment as an unnatural-parity state by 1977Di07 in (|a,|g); 565|g from 3980, 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; 469.73|g M1+E2 to 3-. Other: L({+6}Li,d)=2 from 0+ for a 3630 group disagrees with 4-, which could indicate existence of a different level. 
T$from RDDS in ({+6}Li,pn|g) (2020Ar16). Other: 2.7 ps {I9} from RDM in ({+19}F,2np|g) (1974Ko22), which however results in a very large B(E2)(W.u.) exceeding RUL=100 for 469.7|g. 1977Di07 (also 1981Di09 and subsequent private communication to P.M. Endt from W.R. Dixon) 3646 level must be much longer than the reported value of 3.9 ps discussed that lifetime of the by 1974Ko22, based on recommended upper limit (RUL) for E1 transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) of 3756|g to g.s. and primary 5957|g from 4+ resonance at 9713 in (|a,|g) E=res; 3756|g to g.s. is E2 not M2 based on RUL. 1973Ba13 suggest L(p,t)=(2,3) for a group at 3730 {I20}, giving (2+,3-). However, L({+6}Li,d)=1 from 0+ giving 1- for a group at 3740 {I20} disagrees, which could indicate existence of a different level populated in ({+6}Li,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$L(p,t)=L({+6}Li,d)=3 from 0+. But L({+3}He,n)=(2) for a 3940 group is inconsistent with 3-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,d)=6 from 0+; spin=6 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res. 
T$weighted average of 0.39 ps {I6} from (|a,|g) E=res and 0.45 ps {I7} from ({+6}Li,pn|g), both by DSAM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=(3,5) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res with spin=5 preferred in 1977Di07; spin=(5) from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,2np|g); parity from 885.6|g (E2) to 3-. But L({+6}Li,d)=3 for a 4060 group favors 3- and L(p,t)=4 for a 4060 group favors 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+6}Li,d)=2 from 0+; spin=2 also from |g(|q) of |DJ=2 to 0+ from primary 5582|g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$581|g to 4-, 1340|g to 2+; primary 4727|g from 1-, 5957|g from 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$proposed in |b{++} decay (150 ms) 
$Unrealistic intensity balance at 4803 level in {+44}V |b{++} decay (150 ms) suggests that other |g transitions, yet unseen, de-excite this level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4870 {I30} from ({+16}O,{+12}C), 4860 {I60} from ({+3}He,n), and 4840 {I30} from ({+6}Li,d) 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=L({+3}He,n)=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5230 {I30} from ({+6}Li,d) and 5250 {I30} from ({+16}O,{+12}C) 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=5 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
E$the level in {+40}Ca({+6}Li,d) with J|p=5- is considered different from the 5305 level in {+40}Ca(|a,|g), as otherwise, E3 required for 4222|g gives unrealistically large B(E3)(W.u.)=1300 {I+800-400} 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=5. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=3 from 0+ for a 5410 group. But L(p,t)=(2) for a a 5415 {I10} group is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6030 {I30} from ({+6}Li,d), 6050 {I30} from ({+16}O,{+12}C), 6060 {I60} from ({+3}He,n), and 6030 {I10} from (p,t) 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=2 from 0+. But L(p,t)=(4) is inconsistent. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6220 {I30} from ({+6}Li,d) and 6270 {I30} from ({+16}O,{+12}C) 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=1 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$|g(|q) of 7216|g to 0+ is isotropic; primary |g from 0+ resonances at 9298 and 9338; possible analog of (1+; 1) state at 669 keV in {+44}Sc (1972Si34). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 7560 {I30} from ({+6}Li,d) and 7580 {I30} from ({+16}O,{+12}C) 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=3 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$368.85|g E2, |DJ=2 to (10+); band assignment 
T$pulsed beam in (|a,2n|g) (1976Br15). Other: >1.4 ns from RDM in ({+19}F,2np|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (|a,|g): resonances. 
J$8067|g to 0+; |p=natural for (|a,|g) resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (|a,|g):resonances. Other: 8318 {I5} from (|a,|g) E=res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (|a,|g):resonances. Other: 8385 {I5} from (|a,|g) E=res 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+,1-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (|a,|g):resonances. Other: 8416 {I5} from (|a,|g) E=res 
J$spin=(0,1) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res and |p=natural. L({+6}Li,d)=2+3 for a 8450 group which could be a doublet of the 8449 level in (|a,|g) E=res and the 8465 level in (|a,|g):resonances. The evaluators therefore assign J(8465)=(3-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res and |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=(2,3) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 8565 {I5} from (|a,|g) E=res and 8569 {I3} from (|a,|g):resonances. 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=3 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from (|a,|g):resonances 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. But L({+6}Li,d)=6 for 8750 group suggests 6+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$from weighted average of 8964.0 {I21} in {+40}Ca(|a,|a):resonances, 8960 {I3} in {+40}Ca(|a,|g) E=res. 
J$from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural, with 2+ rejected. L({+6}Li,d)=2 in one of the studies from 0+ suggests 2+, but L=4 in this reaction is also proposed in another experiment. As the uncertainty in the level energy in ({+6}Li,d) is not given, it could possible be a different level from that in (|a,|g) E=res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=4 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; L({+6}Li,d)=4 for a 9000 group. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$other: 9145 {I5} from (|a,|a):resonances 
J$(0+) from R-Matrix analysis in (|a,|g):resonances for a resonance at 9145 {I5} is inconsistent with the primary |g to 0+ g.s. in (|a,|g) E=res, which could imply a different resonance. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$L({+6}Li,d)=6 for a group at 9190 suggests 6+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 
ISPIN$from 1980Di14 in (|a,|g) E=res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=2 also from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res. 
ISPIN$from 1980Di14 in (|a,|g) E=res 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$L(p,t)=0; L({+6}Li,d)=(0). 
ISPIN$from 1978Di11 in (|a,|g) E=res. Isospin-mixed doublet with the 9338 keV level. Possible isospin mixture of T=0 and 1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$other: 9336 {I8} from (p,t) 
J$L({+3}He,n)=L(p,t)=0. 
ISPIN$from 1972Si34 in (|a,|g) E=res. Possible isospin mixture of T=0 and 1. 
$|G{-|a0}/|G=0.32 {I5}, |G{-p}/|G<0.04, |G{-|g}/|G=0.54 {I11} (1978Fr10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=(2,3) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=4 from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$this resonance in (|a,|g) E=res is probably the same level as the 9909 level in (|a,|a):resonances, since the same E(|a) energy is reported in both datasets 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,5-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level is considered as a different level from the 9909,(0+) level in (|a,|a):resonances due to the contradicting J|p assignments, despite close energies 
J$spin=(3,5) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g) E=res; |p=natural 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
E$the same E(|a) is reported for this resonance in (|a,|a):resonances and the 9908 resonance in (|a,|g):E=res, but they are considered as different levels due to contradicting J|p assignments and discrepant level energies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$spin=(2,3) from |g(|q) in (|a,|g):E=res; |p=natural. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$from |g|g(DCO) in ({+28}Si,2|a|g); 2513|g to (10+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$proposed by 1974Pe13 in (|a,|g):E=res. Other: 3- proposed in ({+40}Ca,|a') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (14-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$from |g|g(DCO) in ({+28}Si,2|a|g) and band assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$proposed by 1974Pe13 in (|a,|g):E=res, but 6+ proposed in ({+40}Ca,|a') for a group at 15810 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 1080 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.13 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.33 (1974St03), 0.46 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 1900 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.030 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.25 (1974St03), 0.27 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 2450 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.08 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.16 (1974St03), 0.29 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 2530 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.12 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.25 (1974St03), 0.26 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 3370 (1996Ya01), 3390 (1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.085 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.12 (1974St03), 0.24 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 3960 (1990Ya09), 3940 (1993Gu10). Not seen in 1996Ya01 
L$from 1990Ya09 and 1977Fu03 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.052 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 4020 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.13 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.11 (1974St03), 0.35 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 4100 (1996Ya01), 4090 {I30} (1977Fu03) 
S$other: 0.030 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.2 (1974St03), 0.15 (1977Fu03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 4850 (1996Ya01), 4830 {I30} (1977Fu03), 4840 (1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.13 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.67 (1977Fu03). It is noted in 1977Fu03 the value of 1.35 in their previous work (1974St03) is probably erroneous. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 5060 (1993Gu10) 
L$from 1993Gu10. Others: 2 (1977Fu03); 1993Gu10 also give (1,3) from reanalysis of data in 1977Fu03 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.072 (1977Fu03) for L=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 5230 (1993Gu10), 5210 {I30} (1977Fu03) 
L$from 1993Gu10. Other: 4 (1977Fu03); 1993Gu10 also give 5 from reanalysis of data in 1977Fu03 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.046 (1977Fu03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 5310 (1996Ya01), 5330 (1993Gu10) 
L$others: 3 (1993Gu10), 4 (1977Fu03) 
S$other: 0.020 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.09 (1974St03) and 0.083 if J=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 6220 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
L$from 1990Ya09. Others: (1) (1993Gu10), 2 (1977Fu03) 
S$other: 0.13 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 6470 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10), 6440 {I30} (1977Fu03) 
L$from 1990Ya09. 
S$other: 0.21 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.083 (1977Fu03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 7670 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
L$other: 10 (1993Gu10, 1992Ki18) considered unlikely. 
S$other: 0.26 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 8040 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
L$others: 12 (1993Gu10,1992Ki18), 8 (1990Ya09), |>6 (1974St03), considered unlikely 
S$other: 0.13 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 
$Relative S{-|a}=0.16 if J=6 (1974St03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 8380 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
L$others: 2 (1990Ya09), 3 (1993Gu10) 
S$other: 0.11 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 8540 (1996Ya01, 1993Gu10) 
L$others: 6 (1990Ya09,1992Ki18), 3 (1993Gu10), (0) (1974St03). 1990Ya03 state that their data do not give a good fit to any L value but L=0 is definitely not supported 
S$other: 0.08 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 8950 (1993Gu10), 8960 {I30} (1974St03, questionable) 
L$other: 4 (1993Gu10,1992Ki18) 
S$other: 0.20 at E=37 MeV (1996Ya01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=5 
E$weighted average of 1070 {I30} (1973Er16) and 1090 {I20} (1970FrZR). Other: 1080 (1971Fa12) 
$Spectroscopic factor S{-|a}=0.043 (1973De07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=5 
E$a 3440 level reported in 1971Fa12 but not seen in 1973Er16 or in ({+6}Li,d) is considered by the evaluators as the same level as the 3370 level seen in 1973Er16 and in ({+6}Li,d), due to poor resolution in 1971Fa12. Other: 3350 {I60} (1970FrZR) 
$Spectroscopic factor S{-|a}=0.013 (1973De07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Relative=3.5 
E$others: 6600 (1971Fa12); 6450 {I100} reported in 1970FrZR is probably the same level here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g factor from transient magnetic field method (2003Sc19) 
T$measured mean lifetime |t=3.97 ps {I28} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$proposed to be based on the 0+ state at 14.33 MeV, as the level could not be assigned to a previously known or calculated state (2019Ba45) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured |t=2.68 ps {I21}(stat) {I12}(syst) (from text in 2017Ar09, rounded to 2.7 ps {I2} in authors' table 2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$spin from |g(|q) data (1981Di09); parity is required to be the same as that for 3646 level (1981Di09) and the long lifetime favors negative parity over positive parity (1977Di07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1977Di07 suggested a band structure for 1904, 2531 and 3364 levels and assigned 4+ to this level; parentheses added by the evaluators 
T$weighted average of 0.42 ps {I14} from DSAM and 0.35 ps {I7} from line shape (1977Di07). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(2,3) from |g(|q) in 1971Si13 and 1977Di07; J|p=3+ is proposed in 1977Di07 assuming this level has unnatural parity due to non-observation in particle transfer reaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(-)
level_comment:
J$spin from |g(|q) in 1981Di09; parity is required to be the same as that for 3176 level (1981Di09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(3-,5-) from |g(|q) of 1606|g and primary transitions from (|a,|g) resonance at 9908; 5- is favored by 1977Di07. See also J|p comments for the 9908 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$from 1972Si34. 
J$possible analog of (1+; T=1) state at 669 keV in {+44}Sc (1972Si34). |g(|q) of 7216|g to 0+ is isotropic; primary |g from 0+ resonances at 9298 and 9338 
ISPIN$from 1972Si34 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4+)
level_comment:
$|w|g=0.40 {I8} 
$E(|a)(lab)=4220 
J$spin from |g(|q) in 1981Di09; parity=natural for (|a,|g) resonance, with 2+ rejected 
S$from 1981Di09. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|w|g=0.71 {I21} 
$E(|a)(lab)=4510 
J$spin from |g(|q) in 1980Di14. 
ISPIN$from 1980Di14. 
S$weighted average of 0.5 {I1} (1980Di14) and 0.92 {I20} (2013Sc16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|w|g=6.2 {I5} 
$E(|a)(lab)=4520 
E$from 1977Di07 and 1980Di14. 
ISPIN$from 1980Di14. 
S$weighted average of 6 {I1} (1977Di07) and 6.2 {I5} (2013Sc16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|w|g=1.5 {I3} 
J$from |g(|q) in 1980Di14. 
ISPIN$from 1980Di14. 
S$weighted average of 2.0 {I4} (1980Di14) and 1.32 {I24} (2013Sc16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|w|g=0.112 {I25} 
S$from 1978Di11 
ISPIN$from 1978Di11. Isospin-mixed doublet with the 9338 keV level. Possible isospin mixture of T=0 and 1. 
$%|a=87 {I20}, %p<6 (1978Fr10). 
$See 1978Fr10 (also 1976Fr01 and 1979Fr04) for measurement of |a/|g decay branching ratio in (p,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$|w|g=0.24 {I5} 
$E(|a)(lab)=4640 
E$from 1972Si34, 1977Di07 and 1978Di11. See 1978Fr10 (also 1976Fr01 and 1979Fr04) for measurement of |a/|g decay branching ratio in (p,t). 
S$from 1978Di11 
ISPIN$from 1972Si34. Possible isospin mixture of T=0 and 1. 
$|G{-|a}=0.36 eV {I8} and |G{-|g}=0.77 eV {I20} (1978Di11) from measured |w|g in 1978Di11 and |G{-|a}/|G=0.32 {I5} (1978Fr10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,5-)
level_comment:
$|w|g=1.9 {I4} 
J$|g(|q) of transitions to 3176, 3646 and 4061 levels is consistent with J(9908)=(3,5), J(4061)=3 or 5, J(3646)=4 and J(3176)=3; and with J(9908)=(2,4), J(4061)=4, J(3646)=3, and J(3176)=2 (1977Di07) 
$E(|a)(lab)=5270 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from measured mean lifetime |t=22.5 ps {I18} from RDDS (2020Ar16). Other: 15.1 ps {I11} from lifetime=21.8 ps {I16} which is read off by the evaluators from the plot of lifetime vs recoil-distance in Fig.2 of 2011Mi02. The authors have drawn lines to indicate the mean, lower and upper lifetime values, but didn't list those values explicitly. The result is preliminary as stated in 2011Mi02. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$unweighted average of 9310 (1975Mo26) and 9298 (1978Fr10) 
S$from relative values of 1975Mo26 for 9304 and 9350 levels 
L$from 1975Mo26 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 9330 {I10} (1972Ra05) and 9340 {I8} (1978Ko27) 
$|a decay to {+40}Ca g.s. |g decay is mainly to 7216, T=1 level through 2122|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J J=7/2 from AB (1976Fu06,1966Co19); |p=- from L=3 in (p,d),(d,t),({+3}He,|a) 
T from 1966Po04 (chem; pc 10 T{-1/2}). 
MOMM1,MOME2$AB. Polarization correction for Q. |m/Q>0. {+47,49}Ti standards. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J E2(+M1) |g to 7/2- and D,E2 |g from 1/2+, 1565 
T weighted av of 2.9 |ms {I3} from RDM in (HI,xn|g) and 3.1 |ms {I3} from |g(t) in (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 5/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). D,E2 |g from 9/2-, 1353 
MOMM1 DPAD. Other: -0.08 {I3} (1977St12,DPAD) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (p,d),(d,t),({+3}He,|a). Shape of |s(|q) in ({+3}He,|a) identical to that for g.s., 3/2+ of {+39}Ca 
MOMM1 IPAD, recalculated by 1977Bu10. 2005St24 cite a rounded-off value of +1.1 {I3} 
Configuration: calculation by 1977La12 indicates that a contribution of f7/2 nucleons is required to reproduce |m. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2- : 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 3/2- to 11/2- from D,E2 |g to 7/2-. Ne 9/2,11/2- if D,E2 |g to 3/2-; Ne 9/2+,11/2- if D,E2 |g to 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) and E2 |g to 5/2+ 
T weighted ave(int.) of 0.69 ps {I7} from DSAM in ({+18}O,3n|g), 0.69 ps {I14} from DSAM in (|a,n|g), 0.62 ps {I+21-14} from DSAM in (p,n|g), and 1.1 ps {I6} from RDM in (HI,xn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2,11/2 from |g(|q) and n|g(|q) in (|a,n|g); |DJ=2 E2(+M3) |g to 7/2+. 
T weighted av of 0.45 ps {I9} from DSAM in (|a,n|g) and 0.35 ps {I7} from DSAM in ({+18}O,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
E unweighted av of 4716 {I6} from (p,d),(d,t),({+3}He,|a) and 4730 {I7} from ({+3}He,t) 
J 5/2-,7/2- from L=3 in (p,d),(d,t),({+3}He,|a). IAS({+45}Sc g.s.) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 5/2 from |g(|q) and D(+Q) to 7/2-; |p=- from D,E2 |g from 9/2- 
T from 1977Br15. Others: 11.9 ns {I7} (1970Ly02; see (p,n|g)) and 11.85 ns {I42} (1977St12). 
G Other: -0.03 {I1} (1977St12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_comment:
J 17/2-,19/2- from DWIA (1990An05). 19/2- from the two-nucleon model and systematics of (p,|p{+-}) reactions (1987Th02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$angular distribution of tritons gradually increases with increasing laboratory angle peaking around 16|'. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=MOMM1=+0.9;OFF=0.9
level_spin_parity: 24 (1981Sh19,1989R
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 0+. 
T$weighted average of 4.69 ps {I34} ({+46}Sc |b{+-} decay), 4.5 ps {I5} ({+16}O,2p|g), 5.6 ps {I2} (Coulomb excitation, B(E2)=0.090 {I4}), 7.5 ps {I14} (|g,|g') and 1.4 ps {I+35-7} (p,|g) (1987Mo17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from L=1 in (p,p'). 
T$weighted average of 150 fs {I40} (|a,n|g) and 191 fs {I30} (p,|g); 28 fs {I8} from (|g,|g') and 49 fs {I9} from (p,p'|g) not used. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L=2 in (p,p') and (p,t). However, L=5 in (|a,|a') 
T$weighted average of 28 fs {I10} (|a,n|g) and 29 fs {I+7-3} (p,|g); 13 fs {I2} from (p,p'|g) not used. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). E(level)=3582 from (|a,n|g); 3583 {I3} from weighted average of values from (p,|g) and ({+3}He,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L=1 in ({+3}He,d); L=(2) in (p,t). However, L=(4) in (p,p') 
T$weighted average of 59 fs {I4} (p,|g), 52 fs {I14} (|a,n|g); 33 fs {I+16-11} from (p,p'|g) not included 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J L=2 in (p,t) 
T$weighted average of 10 fs {I4} (p,|g) and 8.5 fs {I25} (p,p'|g); other: <0.024 ps from (|a,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). E(level)=3941 from (|a,n|g); 3941 {I3} from weighted average of values from (p,|g), (p,p'), (p,d) and ({+3}He,|a). 
J L=4 in (p,p') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). E(level)=4029 {I5} from weighted average of values from (p,p') and ({+3}He,|a). 
J from |s(|q) in (e,e'); |g's to 4+ and 0+ levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). E(level)=4140 {I4} from weighted average of values from (p,|g), (|a,t), (p,p') and (p,t). 
J L=2 in (p,p'). However, L=3 in (|a,|a') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from (|g,|g') and |s(|q) in (e,e') 
|G(0){+2}/|G=0.172 eV {I26} (1976Ra03) 
T$from |G(0){+2}/|G in (|g,|g') and |G(0)/|G=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=XREF=DEFGI;ERR=e
level_comment:
J |g to 8+ is |DJ=2, E2; no |g to J<8 
T$weighted averaged of 0.83 ps {I4} (|a,n|g), 1.0 ps {I3} ({+9}Be,3n|g), 0.9 ps {I2} ({+9}Be,2pn|g) and 1.7 ps {I4} ({+28}Si,2|a2p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=XREF=EFGe
level_comment:
J |g to 10+ is |DJ=1, M1; no |g to J<10 
T$from ({+9}Be,3n|g); <0.07 ps from ({+9}Be,2pn|g) and <0.07 ps from ({+28}Si,2|a2p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=XREF=EFGe
level_comment:
J |g to 11+ is |DJ=1, M1; |g to 10+ is |DJ=2, E2 
T$weighted average of 0.57 ps {I6} ({+9}Be,3n|g), 0.35 ps {I9} ({+9}Be,2pn|g) and 0.58 ps {I6} ({+28}Si,2|a2p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=XREF=EFGe
level_comment:
T$from ({+9}Be,3n|g); <0.6 ps from ({+28}Si, 2|a2p|g) 
J |g to 11+ is |DJ=1; |g to 12+ is |DJ=0, D+Q 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
THE T1/2 OF 3570 LEVEL WAS ASSIGNED HERE WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENT 
T$FROM MEASUREMENT ON 2692G BY 1983Ra17, BUT THIS BRANCH REPORTED VERY WEAK BY 1968Er04. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
NDS49 ASSIGNED THIS T1/2 TO THE 3836 LEVEL (SCW-990714) 
NDS68 ASSIGNED THIS T1/2 TO THE 3857 LEVEL (SCW-990714) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.0033 {I9} (1976Ra03). 
T$from |G{+2}{-|g0}/|G and |G{-|g0}/|G=0.453 {I9} from adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G=0.172 eV {I26} (1976Ra03) 
J$based on observation of |g to g.s. (1976Ra03). 
T$from |G{+2}{-|g0}/|G and |G{-|g0}/|G=1.00 from adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
B(E2)=0.091 {I3}, Q=-0.21 {I4}, from weighted averages of the following: B(E2)=0.091 {I5} (2000Er01); B(E2)=0.0855 {I40}, Q=-0.21 {I6} (1975To06); B(E2)=0.097 {I7}, Q=-0.28 {I14} (1971De29); B(E2)=0.107 {I10}, Q=-0.19 {I6} (1970Ha24). 
g-factor=0.496 {I26} from weighted averages of the following: 0.496 {I27} (2000Er01) and 0.49 {I12} (1981Sh19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Mean lifetime |t=7.76 ps {I18}, as weighted average of 7.55 ps {I27} and 7.92 ps {I24} for the two rings (forward and backward). Others: T{-1/2} is 5.32 ps {I15} in {+46}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (July 2000 update); 5.29 ps {I5} (2003Mo02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Mean lifetime |t=2.20 ps {I26}, as weighted average of 2.21 ps {I50} and 2.19 ps {I31} for the two rings (forward and backward). Others: T{-1/2} is 1.62 ps {I10} in {+46}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database; 1.39 ps {I10} (2003Mo02); 1.39 ps {I16} (2004Br18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Mean lifetime |t=1.38 ps {I34}, as weighted average of 1.34 ps {I47} and 1.43 ps {I50} for the two rings (forward and backward). Others: T{-1/2} is 0.99 ps {I9} in {+46}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database; 0.93 ps {I9} (2004Br18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
$Mean lifetime |t|<1.2 ps, from |<1.2 ps for the two rings (forward and backward). Others: T{-1/2} is 0.49 ps {I6} in {+46}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database; 0.92 ps {I23} (2003Mo02); 0.354 ps {I35} (2004Br18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$5- for a level at 13990 from calculations, but the authors didn't assign this J|p to this observed level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$6+ for a level at 14350 from calculations, but the authors didn't assign this J|p to this observed level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J J=5/2 from NMR (1953Je16) and EPR (1961Ga16) (1976Fu06). |p=- from L(n)=3 in pickup reactions 
MOMM1 NMR, {+39}K standard 
MOME2 HFS; LASER-induced fluorescence. Sternheimer-free determination. Other: +0.29 {I1} (2005St24,1965Ch19). AB, no polarization correction included 
MOMM3,MOME4$ABLFS 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T weighted av from |g(t) in (p,p'|g) and RDM in ({+19}F,n2p|g). Other: 0.22 ns {I7} from |a|g(t) in Coul. Ex. 
MOMM1 From (|a,n|g). Note agreement of g=-0.55 {I17} with Schmidt g-factor (-0.55), assuming (f{-7/2}){+3} neutron configuration for this state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from M1+E2 |g to 7/2- and D+Q |g from 11/2- 
T weighted av from DSAM in ({+14}C,3n|g) and (|a,n|g). Other: 0.35 ps {I14} from DSAM in (|a,np|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$others: 1.0 ps {I4} and 1.0 ps {I+12-5} from DSAM in (p,p'|g) and 1.2 ps {I4} from DSAM in (|a,np|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T weighted av 26 fs {I7} (1967Ra03) from (|g,|g') and 21 fs {I6} (1972We18) and 36 fs {I10} (1979PeZV) from DSAM in (p,p'|g). 25.1 fs {I43} is arithmetic mean of 25.3 fs {I42} (NRM) and 24.8 fs {I43} (RT) with RT uncertainty adopted; LWM gives 25.3 fs {I42}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2,13/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) to 11/2- in (|a,n|g). Lack of observation in ({+14}C,3n|g) and ({+7}Li,3np|g) supports 9/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J D |g from 13/2 state; high selection of yrast states states in fusion evaporation and restrictions on |g(|q) (Cf. 1985Wa09). |p=- from membership in band 
T$others: >6.9 ps from DSAM in (p,p'|g), >7.2 ps from DSAM in (|a,n|g), and |>2.4 ps from DSAM in (|a,np|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
E weighted av of 3203 {I10} from (d,p), 3219 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 3220 {I20} from (p,d), and 3220 {I20} from ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 19/2 from |g(|q) in ({+14}C,3n|g). |p=- from D,E2 |g to 15/2- 
T$others: 0.20 ps {I+23-16} from DSAM in (|a,n|g) and 0.25 ps {I9} from DSAM in (|a,np|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D |g to J{-i}-1 state; high selection of yrast states states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on |g(|q) (Cf. 1985Wa09). |p=- from D,E2 |g to 17/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J D |g to J{-i}-1 state; high selection of yrast states states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on |g(|q) (Cf. 1985Wa09). |p=- from D,E2 |g to 19/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 27/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 21/2- to 27/2- from D,E2 |g to 23/2 state. |>25/2 from high selection of yrast states in fusion evaporation and restrictions on |g(|q) (Cf. 1985Wa09). Ne 25/2 from J|)J or J|)J-2 |g to 23/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 17/2,21/2- from J|)J or J|)J-2, E2 |g to 17/2-; |=17/2 from membership in band. 19/2 (1986Wa19) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 27/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 25/2,27/2 (1986Wa19). |=25/2 from J|)J or J|)J-2 |g to 23/2-; |p=- from D,E2 |g to 23/2- (1994Ca04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) excludes 5/2 (1972We18) 
T from 1976Wh01 (E(p)=5 MeV. |g(t); Ge(Li)) 
G E|a=8 and 8.5 MeV; IPAD from g({+47}Ti,159)/g({+45}Ti,329)=-0.79 {I16}, if g({+45}Ti,329)=+0.70 {I16} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 9/2- from |g(|q) and linear pol (1973Sa12) and from |g(|q) and RUL's (1972We18) 
T from DSAM in (p,p'|g) (1972We18). Other: 146 fs {I30} (1979PeZV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2- from |g(|q) and linear pol (1973Sa12) and from |g(|q) and RUL(1285|g) (1972We18) 
T from DSAM in (p,p'|g) (1972We18). Other: 1.0 ps {I+12-5} (1979PeZV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2 to 7/2 from |g(|q) (1972We18) 
T weighted av of 1.6 ps {I7} (1972We18) and 1.4 ps {I5} (1979PeZV) from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) allows 3/2 or 5/2; 3/2+ favored by model-dependent arguments (1972We18) 
T agrees with previous limits established by 1972We18 and 1976Wh01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D,E2 |g to 7/2- excludes 3/2+ 
T weighted av of 0.8 ps {I4} (1972We18) and 0.51 ps {I13} (1979PeZV) from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2,9/2- from D,E2 |g's to 5/2- and 7/2-. Probably not 9/2- from B(E2)(W.u.)(g.s.)>63. |=3/2- if mult(955|g)=D and J|p(3252)=7/2-. Agreement with (|g,|g) data. 
T other: 8 fs {I5} from DSAM in (p,p'|g) (1972We18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2,11/2- from D,E2 |g's to 7/2- and 9/2-. D,E2 to 5/2- indicates 9/2- 
T weighted av of 21 fs {I9} (1972We18) and 26 fs {I10} (1979PeZV) from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2,5/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1/2- to 7/2- from D,E2 |g's to 3/2- and 5/2-. |=7/2- from D,E2 |g to 1825 state if J|p(1825)=3/2+ 
T other: >1.4 ps from DSAM in (p,p'|g) (1972We18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2,7/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2- to 9/2- from D,E2 |g's to 5/2- and 7/2-. |=7/2-,9/2- from D,E2 |g to 1825 state if J|p(1825)=3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2,13/2
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 9/2 or 13/2 from |g(|q) (1973Sa12). If |d of 1973Sa12 is assumed, |p|=+ and 13/2- is favored from RUL (1979PeZV). However, this state is not observed in ({+14}C,3n|g) indicating 9/2 (evaluator) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 7/2 or 11/2 from |g(|q); 11/2- from |g excit (1973Sa12). |p|=- from B(M1)(W.u.)<.001; 7/2 from syst of T{-1/2}'s and excitation energies (1979PeZV). 
T other: >7.2 ps from DSAM in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 3/2- to 9/2- from D,E2 |g's to 7/2- and 5/2-. (5/2)- if this is the (5/2)-, L=3, state observed in (pol d,p) and (d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J if not a doublet, 3/2-,(5/2+) from D,E2 |g to 7/2- and D,(E2) to 1/2+. If a doublet as evidenced by L=3 in (d,p) and lower E(level) from |g to 7/2-, J|p=1/2+,3/2+,5/2+ from decay to |p=+ states and maybe 3/2- and J|p=5/2-,7/2- from decay to 7/2- and maybe 3/2- and 5/2-. Evaluator's Note: evidence for doublet also supported by 3177; |<5/2+ state in (n,|g) decaying to 1825 state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 13/2 from |g(|q) (1973Sa12). If 2682 is 7/2+ member of a K|p=3/2+ band, this state is likely candidate for 9/2+ member; J|p=7/2- to 13/2 from D,E2 |g to 11/2- and D |g to 2682 if J(2682)=11/2 
T discrepant with results from ({+14}C,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-,9/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2- to 15/2- from D,E2 |g to 11/2-. |=15/2 from D |g to 5/2- to 11/2-. If J|p(2682)=7/2+, |=11/2-,13/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J if not a doublet, 1/2-,3/2 from D,E2 |g to 5/2- and D |g to 1/2+. If a doublet as evidenced by L=0 in (d,p) and lower E(level) from g.s. |g, 1/2+ decaying to 1/2+ and 3/2+,5/2+ and 1/2- to 9/2- decaying to g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J if not a doublet, 3/2-,5/2 from D,E2 |g's to 1/2+ and 7/2-. If a doublet, as suggested by 1/2-, L=1 state in (pol d,p) and (d,p) no conclusions were reached. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J (7/2 to 11/2) from D |g to 3287 if J|p(3287)=(9/2+). (11/2+) if member of K|p=3/2+ band 
T discrepant with results from ({+14}C,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J,ISPIN antianalog state, T=3/2, since L=0 component in proton angular distribution. 
Strongly excited; however, only one weak transition seen; 1973Me04 suggest that decay goes by many branches. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E spectrograph values 24 keV higher in this region. A similar effect was observed by 1971Kn04 in the {+31}P({+3}He,p|g) and {+39}K({+3}He,p|g) reactions. 
IAS({+47}Sc,g.s.) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
Doublet (1976Ha14) 
J calculated |g-decay are inconsistent with observed decay if J|p=11/2-; 1976Me15 suggest J|p=7/2+ or 11/2+ for the 2684 state. 1976Ha14 suggest 13/2- and (11/2-) for the doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 19/2- from characteristic shape of a broad maximum near 20|', (d|s/d|W(|a,d))/(d|s/d|W({+3}He,p))(|q=7|')=15 {I6}, and |g-ray data (1976Ha14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_comment:
J |g-deexcitation pattern would agree with measured E(level)'s and f7/2-shell-model calculations only if J|p=21/2- (1976Me15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
$g|G{+2}{-|g0}/|G (MeV)=78.0 {I75} 
J |s(96|')/|s(126|') (2297|g) excludes 9/2. RUL(2137) excludes 3/2. |p=+ excluded since |d{+2}<0.001 from RUL(M2) not consistent with |s(96|')/|s(126|') (2297|g) 
T T{-1/2}=3.3 fs {I4} if J|p=5/2-; T{-1/2}=4.4 fs {I5} if J|p=7/2-. |G{-|g0}/|G=0.75 used in calculations instead of measured 0.77 {I3} (1976Ra03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1961Ho05 (|a|g(t); NaI. E|<4 MeV) 
BE2 Unweighted av of 0.0281 {I42} (1962Ri09) and 0.040 {I6} (1956Te26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
BE2 0.0062 {I12} (1967Af03) assuming no contamination of 1250|g from 1.44 to 0.16 MeV transition. Not adopted by evaluator due to problems associated with 1250|g (see Adopted Gammas) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
From 1970Ra29; not reported by 1978Fo34. C{+2}S values correspond to the two L-values, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |t=331 ps {I4} (stat) {I14} (syst) (2024Ut02), with uncertainty combined in quadrature by compiler. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=L(|a,|a')=2 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 4.64 ps {I42} (1981Ca10), 4.9 ps {I15} (1963Ak03), and 4.2 ps {I14} (1958Kn36) from |G in (|g,|g); 2.9 ps {I+21-13} (1973Ba02) from DASM in (p,p'|g); 3.95 ps {I61} (2000Er01), 4.16 ps {I90} (1973Ba02), 3.67 ps {I56} (1972WaYZ), and 5.75 ps {I89} (1973Fi15) from DSAM in Coulomb excitation, and 5.0 ps {I5} from adopted B(E2)|^=0.061 {I6} below. Other: 4.90 ps {I+22-21} from B(E2) evaluation by 2016Pr01 using the same data, with its difference from the adopted value here due to the fact that 2016Pr01 does not take into account the additional systematic uncertainty from the stopping power theory in DSAM for values in 1973Fi15 and 2000Er01 in Coulomb excitation (see details in this dataset), which take up most of the weight in their weighted average. 
MOMM1$from Transient Fields method (2000Er06). Others: +0.9 {I4} (1981Sh19, TF). 
MOME2$from electron scattering (1972Li12). Others: -0.38 {I13} (1971De29), -0.22 {I8} (1970Ha24), and -0.135 eb {I88} (1972Le19) from Coulomb excitation. See also 2016St14 compilation. 
$B(E2)|^=0.0613 {I56}, unweighted average of 0.0537 {I36} in (e,e'), 0.050 {I15} in (p,p'), 0.0694 {I52} in (|p{++},|p{+-}), 0.072 {I4} in Coulomb excitation. Other: 0.0069 from (|a,|a') (1970Br07) is discrepant, lower than other values by one order of magnitude. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=(|a,|a')=4 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 0.97 ps {I35} from DSAM in (|a,p|g), 1.4 ps {I+6-5} from (|g,|g), 1.5 ps {I8} from DSAM in (n,n'|g), and 0.76 ps {I13} (2000Er01) and 1.66 ps {I42} (1973Ba02) from DSAM Coulomb excitation. 
MOMM1$from Transient Fields method (2000Er06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=2 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 42 fs {I14} (1979Gl07) and 30 fs {I6} (1978Li13) in (|a,p|g), 13.9 fs {I28} (1993Ko57), 28 fs {I12} (1989Ge05) and 31.9 fs {I21} (1993BeZL) in (n,n'|g), 11 fs {I+7-11} (1969Ka10), 24 fs {I5} (1973Ba02) and 19 fs {I+11-9} (1978DeYT) in (p,p'|g), and 51 fs {I9} (2000Er06) in Coulomb excitation, all from DSAM. Others: 33 fs {I+16-9} from |G in (|g,|g') and 35 fs {I+7-5} from adopted B(E2)|^ below, both depending on the adopted branching ratio of 2421|g. Averaging all values above gives a value of 30.8 fs {I21}, with a reduced |h{+2}=1.5. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=L(p,t)=0 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 64 fs {I11}(1989Ge05) in (n,n'|g), 87 fs {I21} (1969Ka10), 111 fs {I22} (1973Ba02) and 194 fs {I+76-49} (1978DeYT) in (p,p'|g), all from DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$from (p,p'). Other: 3017 from (e,e'). 
J$from PWBA analysis of |s(|q) in (e,e'). 
$B(E2)|^=0.00112 {I20} (1990Gu09) from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=3 from p|g(|q) in (p,p'|g); 2240.4|g M1+E2 to 2+. 
T$weighted average of 54 fs {I17} (1979Gl07) and 39 fs {I6} (1978Li13) in (|a,p|g), 29 fs {I18} (1993Ko57) in (n,n'|g), 17 fs {I+9-11} (1969Ka10), 29 fs {I+13-10} (1973Ba02) and 31 fs {I+14-12} (1978DeYT) in (p,p|g), all from DSAM. 
$B(M3)|^=0.50 {I10} (1990Gu09) in (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=4 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 49 fs {I14} (1979Gl07) in (|a,p|g), 50 fs {I11} (1993Ko57) in (n,n'|g), 69 fs {I+37-29} (1969Ka10), 30 fs {I+14-11} (1973Ba02), and 62 fs {I+28-21} (1978DeYT) in (p,p'|g), all from DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=6 from 0+. 
T$from RDM by 1974Br04 in (|a,p|g). Others: >3.5 ps (1979Gl07), >1.3 ps (1978Li13), from DSAM in (|a,p|g); >7 ps from DSAM by 1993Ko57 in (n,n'|g); 221 fs {I+48-44} from DSAM by 1969Ka10 in (p,p'|g) is strongly discrepant with other values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3 from 0+; L(d,t)=0 from 7/2-; 2375.2|g D(+Q) to 2+. 
T$weighted average of 198 fs {I+80-70} (1979Gl07) in (|a,p|g), 173 fs {I+38-34} (1969Ka10), 243 fs {I62} (1973Ba02), and 173 fs {I+55-42} (1978DeYT) in (p,p'|g), and 180 fs {I56} (1993Ko57) in (n,n'|g), all from DSAM. 
$B(E3)|^=0.0080 {I16} from model-dependent analysis in (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from p|g(|q) in (p,p'|g); L(d,p)=1+3 from 5/2- 
T$weighted average of 13.2 fs {I14} (1993BeZL) and 9.0 fs {I14} (1989Ge05) in (n,n'|g), 15 fs {I9} (1969Ka10) and 12 fs {I5} (1973Ba02) in (p,p'|g), all from DSAM. Others: 30 fs {I+13-9} (1978DeYT) in (p,p'|g) and 29.1 fs {I56} (1993Ko57) in (n,n'|g) are discrepant; 12.5 fs {I+35-27} from |G in (|g,|g') and 12.7 fs {I+31-23} from B(E2)|^ in (e,e'), both depending on the adopted branching ratio of 3371|g. Averaging all values above gives 12.0 fs {I14}, with a reduced |h{+2}=2.5. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=6 from 0+. 
T$deduced by the evaluator from 1.4 ps<T{-1/2}<2.4 ps, with lower limit from DSAM by 1979Gl07 and upper limit from RDM by 1974Br04 in (|a,p|g). Other: 0.9 ps {I+5-3} from DSAM by 1978Li13 in (|a,p|g), but it is inconsistent with T{-1/2}>1 ps from RUL of 176|g assuming Mult(176|g)=M1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=2 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 38 fs {I13} (1979Gl07) from (|a,p|g) and 53 fs {I+21-14} (1978DeYT) from (p,p'|g), both from DSAM. Others: 8.3 fs {I28} (1989Ge05) from DSAM in (n,n'|g) and 10.3 fs {I26} (1969Ka10) from DSAM in (p,p'|g) are discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=1 from p|g(|q) in (p,p'|g); 1- from model-dependent analysis of measured form factors by 1989Gu17 in (e,e'); |p=- tentatively assigned by 1990De20 based on measured |g(|q) and azimuthal asymmetries; |p=- is also supported by the 3703|g feeding from the 5643, 3- level. But |p=+ from 2715.8|g M1+E2 to 2+ in (p,p'|g) (1968Mo20) is discrepant. Other: 1+ assigned by 1993Ko57 in (n,n'|g). 
T$from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 6.1 fs {I+16-12} from |G in (|g,|g') and adopted branching ratio of 3699|g; 24 fs {I4} from DSAM in (p,p'|g) is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$3738.4|g M1 to 0+ 
T$from DSAM in (n,n'|g). Other: 3.1 fs {I+9-7} from |G in (|g,|g) and the adopted branching ratio of 3738|g; <1.4 fs from DSAM in (|a,p|g); 112 fs (1978DeYT) and 11 fs {I3} (1969Ka10) from DSAM in (p,p'|g) are discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,p')=3 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 48 fs {I14} (1979Gl07) and 27 fs {I6} (1978Li13) in (|a,p|g), 97 fs {I66} in (n,n'|g), 39 fs {I+14-11} in (p,p'|g), all from DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=5 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g) (1979Gl07); |p=- proposed by 1989Hi05 in (p,p'), but no |s(|q) or analyzing power data given 
T$from DSAM in (|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e') (1990Gu09). 
$B(M1)|^=0.17 {I7} (1990Gu09) in (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e') (1990Gu09). 
$B(M1)|^=0.14 {I10} (1990Gu09) in (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4,5-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$1142.3|g to 4+ can not be pure E2 (|DJ=2) from comparison with RUL; 1261|g from 3-. 
T$weighted average of 21 fs {I14} from (|a,p|g) and 28 fs {I14} from (n,n'|g), using DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=(p,t)=4 from 0+ 
T$weighted average of 35 fs {I14} from (|a,p|g) and 55 fs {I+49-28} from (n,n'|g), using DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=3 from nuclear orientation and circular polarization in (n,|g) E=thermal; parity=+ from L(d,p)=1 from 5/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a')=L(p,t)=3 from 0+. 
T$weighted average of 28 fs {I14} from (|a,p|g) and 62 fs {I21} from (n,n'|g), both using DSAM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=L(p,p')=4 from 0+. 
T$from DSAM in (n,n'|g) (1993Ko57). Other: 66 fs {I24} from DSAM in (|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E,J$L(p,d)=0 from 7/2- gives J|p=3-,4- for a group at 4750 {I15}, which could be the same level here; 1140.94|g to 2+ favors 3-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2,3-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$1092.3|g to 1-, 2371.2|g to 2+, 1572.4|g from 3-. Others: L(d,t)=L(p,d)=0 from 7/2-, L(d,p)=1 from 5/2-, L(t,p)=L(|a,|a')=2 from 0+, and L(p,t)=3 from 0+ for a multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$4793.5|g to 0+, 2498.4|g to 4+; L(t,p)=L(|a,|a')=2 from 0+ and L(d,p)=1 from 5/2- for a multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-,4)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$749|g to 5(-), 942|g to 3-, 1571|g to 3+. Others: L(d,t)=L(p,d)=0 from 7/2-, L(d,p)=1 from 5/2-, and L(p,t)=3 from 0+ for a multiplet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2+)
level_comment:
J$4911.8|g to 0+, 1686.6|g to 3+. Other: 2+ from model-independent PWBA in (e,e') for a doublet at 4918, with B(E2)|^=0.00138 {I21} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=2 from 7/2-; 1484|g to 6+, 1139|g to 3-; natural parity from presence in (|a,|a') spectra. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=4 from 0+; (2,3) from nuclear orientation and circular polarization in (n,|g) E=thermal is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin=8 from p|g(|q); 1689|g to 6+ can not be M2 from comparison to RUL. Other: L(d,t)=3(+1) from 7/2-, giving J|p=(2 to 5)+ for a group at 5199, is inconsistent. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e'). 
$B(E2)|^=0.00164 {I28} (1990Gu09) from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$from |s(|q) and analyzing powers in (p,p') and also from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from |G{+2}{-|g0}/|G in (|g,|g') and adopted branching ratio of 5640|g. 
$B(M1)|^=0.47 {I8} (1990Gu09) from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e'). 
$B(M1)|^=0.25 {I4} (1990Gu09) from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e'). 
$B(E2)|^=0.00031 {I10} (1990Gu09) from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$see comment for 5888.5 level. 
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e'); L(d,t)=2 from 7/2- for a group at 5886. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3)
level_comment:
$One of the 5884, (3-) and 5885, 2+ levels could correspond to this level, and the other one is a separate level. 
J$2085.7|g to 2-, 2517.6|g to 2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1+,3+
level_comment:
J$from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e'). 
$B(M1)|^=0.08 {I3}, B(M3)|^=0.236 {I59} from (e,e') (1990Gu09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
J$L(|a,|a'=(2) from 0+. Other: 2+,3+ from model-dependent PWBA for a group at 6011 in (e,e'). 
$B(E2)=0.00051 {I12} (1990Gu09) from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6014 {I15} from (t,p) and 6025 {I10} from (p,p'). Other: 6029 from (e,e'). 
J$from model-independent analysis of measured |s(|q) in (e,e'); 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+:4+)
level_comment:
J$3633.4|g to 2+. Other: 1+,3+ from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e') for a doublet, with B(M1)|^=0.10 {I3} and B(M3)|^=0.15 {I4} (1990Gu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e'); also L(p,p')=3 from 0+ for a group at 6258 {I10}. 
$B(E3)|^=0.0035 {I4} from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+:6+)
level_comment:
J$4119|g to 4+. Other: L(d,t)=0 from 7/2- gives 3-,4- for a group at 6407; 3- from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e') for a group at 6424, with B(E3)|^=0.0056 {I29} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0-,1,2,3)
level_comment:
J$2888.9|g to 1+, primary 4999.97|g from 2-,3-. Other: L(d,t)=(0+2) from 7/2- gives 3-,4- for a group at 6623. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3,4+)
level_comment:
J$5724|g to 2+, 4412|g to 4+. Other: L(|a,|a')=4 from 0+ for a group at 6701 and L(|p{++},|p{++}') from 0+ for a group at 6700 gives 4+, L(d,t)=(3) from 7/2- for a group at 6713; 1+,3+ from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e') for a doublet, with B(M1)|^=0.21 {I7}, B(M3)|^=0.206 {I41} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2,3,4)
level_comment:
J$3573.9|g to 3+; primary 4829.7|g from 2-,3-. Others: L(|a,|a')=(5,4) from 0+ for a group at 6797 is inconsistent with L(d,t)=(0+2) from 7/2- for a group at 6797. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2,3,4+)
level_comment:
J$3104.4|g to 3-, 4536.0|g to 2+. Others: L(|a,|a')=3, L(p,p')=3, and L(|p{++},|p{++}')=3 from 0+ for a group at 6957, 6963 {I10} and 6960, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$also 1+,3+ from model-dependent PWBA analysis in (e,e'). 
$B(M1)|^=0.18 {I7}, B(M3)|^=0.186 {I99} from (e,e') (1990Gu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2,3,4+)
level_comment:
J$3147|g to 2+, 2840|g to (3,4,5-). Other: L(p,p')=(3) from 0+ gives (3-) for a group at 7221 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e'); L(d,p)=1 from 5/2-. 
$B(E2)|^=0.00085 {I19} from (e,e') (1990Gu09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2)
level_comment:
J$3852.3|g to 3-, 3876.8|g to 1+, 3916.8|g to 1-. Other: (4+) from DWBA analysis and analyzing power in (p,p') for a group at 7618 {I10} is inconsistent, which could indicate a different level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 7836 {I12} from (d,p) and 7853 {I10} from (p,p'). 
J$1+,2+,3+,4+ from L(d,p)=1+3; 1+,3+ from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e'). Other: (4+) from |s(|q) and analyzing powers in (p,p') is discrepant. 
$B(M3)|^=0.038 {I11} from (e,e') (1990Gu09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 8046 {I12} from (d,p) and 8057 {I10} from (p,p'). 
J$from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e'). 
$B(M1)|^=0.09 {I3}, B(M3)|^=0.084 {I19} from (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 8086 {I12} from (d,p) and 8093 {I10} from (p,p') This level could be a different level from the 8091 level from (|a,p|g). See comment for 8091 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12,10,8,6
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g). Excitation in (|a,p|g) is consistent with prediction (1978Ku16) of a single 12+ state near 8 MeV, which could indicate 8093 {I10} from (p,p') and 8086 {I12} from (d,p) are different levels from this one. 
T$from DSAM in ({+14}C,2n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$1,2 from |g(|q) and azimuthal asymmetries in (|g,|g); 1+,3+ from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e'). 
$B(M1)|^=0.24 {I9} from model-dependent PWBA in (e,e') (1990Gu09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(2|n2|b{+-})=5.6|*10{+19} y {I+14-11}, from weighted average of 6.4|*10{+19} y {I+7-6}(stat) {I+12-9}(syst) (2016Ar19), 4.3|*10{+19} y {I+24-11} (1996Ba80, syst |DT{-1/2}=1.4|*10{+19} y), and 4.2|*10{+19} y {I+33-13} (2000Br63) for decay to this state; syst |DT{-1/2} added in quadrature before averaging. Note that 4.2|*10{+19} y {I+22-11} from 2006BaZZ is from the average of the latter two. Other: >3.6|*10{+19} y (1970Ba61). Theory: 1.3|*10{+19} y|<T{-1/2}(2|n2|b{+-})|<6.0|*10{+19} y (1998Su19). 
$T{-1/2}(0|n2|b{+-})|>5.8|*10{+22} y for decay to this state (2008Um05, 90% C.L.). Others: >2.0|*10{+22} y (2016Ar19, 90% C.L.), >1.5|*10{+21} y (2000Br63, 90% C.L.), >1.1|*10{+21} y (1989Ba05), >9.5|*10{+21} y (1991Yo05, 76% C.L.), and >1.6|*10{+19} y (1991SaZQ). Theory: 1.3|*10{+25} y|<T{-1/2}(0|n2|b{+-})|<4.0|*10{+25} y (1998Su19). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(2|b{+-})>1.8|*10{+20} y for decay to this state (2002Bb03, 90% C.L.). Other: T{-1/2}(0|n2|b{+-})>1.0|*10{+21} y (1970Ba61). Theory: T{-1/2}(2|n2|b{+-})=5.0|*10{+26} y (1984Ha60). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(2|b{+-})>1.5|*10{+20} y for decay to this state (2002Bb03, 90% C.L.). Theory: T{-1/2}(2|n2|b{+-})=3.6|*10{+26} y (1984Ha60). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(2|b{+-})>1.5|*10{+20} y for decay to this state (2002Bb03, 90% C.L.). Other: T{-1/2}(0|n2|b{+-})>8|*10{+18} y (1986Al05, 95% C.L.). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$1974Me15 report E|b{++}=3035 {I46} with I|b{++}(to 983)/I|b{++}(to 2296)=0.00170 {I24}, which however would result in log| {Ift}(to 983)=10.9 {I1}, inconsistent with the expected value of >12.8. The upper limit of I(|e+|b{++}) from |g+ce intensity balance is negative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 960 {I25} (1961Ha41), 983 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 958 {I25} (1961Ha41) and 980 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.33 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 2293 (1964Bj01, for calibration), 2299 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.085 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 2426 {I15} (1961Ha41), 2426 {I8} (1964Bj01), 2423 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 2421 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 2416 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.34 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 3231 {I15} (1961Ha41), 3231 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3229 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 3225 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 3219 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.54 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 3337 {I15} (1961Ha41), 3339 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3342 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 3332 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 3331 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.18 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 3374 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3377 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 3367 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 3367 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.16 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 3519 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3519 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3520 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 3512 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 3509 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
S$for L=3. 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.10 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 3630 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3631 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 3623 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 3620 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.29 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 3750 {I8} (1964Bj01), 3752 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 3742 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 3741 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.13 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4047 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4048 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4039 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4036 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.30 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4086 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4087 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4078 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4075 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.13 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4207 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4210 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4199 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4198 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.03 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4396 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4403 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4387 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4390 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=1.14 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4467 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4470 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4458 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4457 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=1.28 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4592 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4595 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4583 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4581 {I12} (1965Ba07). Doublet (1968Wi02,1965Ba07). 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.02 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4728 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4734 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4719 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4720 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.55 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4797 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4809 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4787 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4795 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.23 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$original values: 4858 {I8} (1964Bj01), 4876 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
E$weighted average of 4848 {I8} (1964Bj01) and 4861 {I12} (1965Ba07) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.47 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$from 1971He08 
BE2$other: 0.111 {I7}, another value from fit in 1971He08 
$Static quadrupole moment Q{-2}=-0.177 eb {I8} from electron scattering (1972Li12). 1972Li12 also report a value of -0.200 eb {I37} determined from B(E2) ratios. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
BE2$weighted average of 0.0049 {I9} (1971He08) and 0.0040 {I6} (1990Gu09, model-dependent analysis). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+&3-
level_comment:
E,J$2+ from model-independent analysis; but model-dependent analysis shows a transition of another multipolarity (E3) is also excited giving rise to a line in the spectrum in the vicinity of the 2+ level. 
BE2$weighted average of 0.0076 {I10} (model-independent analysis) and 0.0068 {I12} (model-dependent analysis). 
BE3$from model-dependent analysis (1990Gu09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$3- from model-independent analysis; however, careful model-dependent analysis shows the state to be 1- excited by an octupole vibration. Such incorrect model-independent J|p assignments occur in the case of the very special transition mechanism discussed in 1989Gu17 and the other model-independent 3- states observed here require further study. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.95 ps {I61} (2000Er01), 4.16 ps {I90} (1973Ba02), 3.67 ps {I56} (1972WaYZ), and 5.75 ps {I89} (1973Fi15), all by DSAM lineshape analysis. 
$Original T{-1/2}: 3.95 ps {I14} (2000Er01), 5.75 ps {I20} (1973Fi15) 
BE2$weighted average of 0.10 {I2} (1959Al95), 0.070 {I14} (1960An07), 0.080 {I16} (1967Af03), 0.069 {I6} (1970Ha24), 0.081 {I8} (1970MiZQ), 0.072 {I4} (1971De29) and 0.071 {I6} (1972WaYZ), all from |g-ray yields. Other: 0.031 {I6} from 1956Te26 is an outlier. 
$1960An07 point it out (on page 409) that B(E2)|^=0.14 from their earlier study in 1959Al95 is in error and should be 0.10 instead. 
$Static quadrupole moment Q{-2}=-0.22 eb {I8}, weighted average of -0.38 eb {I13} (1971De29), -0.22 eb {I8} (1970Ha24), and -0.135 eb {I88} (1972Le19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.76 ps {I13} (2000Er01) and 1.66 ps {I42} (1973Ba02), both by DSAM lineshape analysis. Both values are used in average for adopted T{-1/2} in Adopted Levels. 
$Original T{-1/2}: 0.76 ps {I7} (2000Er01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=2000 
E$others: 980 {I30} (1972Ko43), 983 (1973Ba13, for calibration) 
S$other: 1870 (1983Sa29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=720 
E$others: 2300 {I30} (1972Ko43), 2294 {I10} (1973Ba13) 
S$other: 645 (1983Sa29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=880 
E$others: 2420 {I30} (1972Ko43), 2416 {I10} (1973Ba13) 
S$other: 802 (1983Sa29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=140 
E$others: 3000 {I30} (1972Ko43), 3007 {I10} (1973Ba13) 
S$other: 1270 (1983Sa29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=210 
E$others: 3240 {I30} (1972Ko43), 3234 {I10} (1973Ba13) 
S$other: 1320 (1983Sa29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=1190 
E$others: 3360 {I30} (1972Ko43), 3353 {I10} (1973Ba13) 
L$other: 3 from 1972Ko43 and 1973Ba13 is inconsistent and could indicate a separate level 
S$other: 900 for L=3 (1973Ba13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=75 
E$others: 3820 {I30} (1972Ko43), 3820 {I20} (1973Ba13) 
L$from 1973Ba13. Other: (4) (1972Ko43) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=1100 
E,L$from 1973Ba13. Other: a doublet at 4770 {I50} possibly with L=0 (1972Ko43) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 4590 {I20} (1973Ba13) 
L$from 1973Ba13. Other: (0),3 from 1983Sa29, probably an unresolved doublet of the 3- and 0+ levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=650 
E$others: 4790 {I50} (1972Ko43), 4783 {I10} (1973Ba13) 
L$from 1983Sa29 and 1973Ba13. Other: (4) from 1972Ko43 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$(2L+1)|s{-exp}/|s{-DWBA}=1870 
E$others: 4910 {I50} (1972Ko43), 4920 {I20} (1973Ba13) 
L$from 1983Sa29. Other: 5,6 from 1973Ba13 
S$for L=5 (1973Ba13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1977Fu03. Others: 1000 (1981Be26), 983 (1977Mo06,1980Cu06) 
S$others: 0.23 (1980Cu06), 0.18 (1977Mo06). S(2+)/S(0+)|?0.8 from 1981Be26 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1977Fu03. Other: 2360 (1981Be26), unresolved doublet of 2290+2420 
$S(4+)/S(0+)<0.3 from 1981Be26 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$other: 1978Li13 report 2.3 ps {I+21-7} from DSAM, which however is not adopted by the authors as too close to the limit of applicability of DSAM method. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$deduced by the evaluator from 1.4 ps<T{-1/2}<2.4 ps, with lower limit from DSAM in 1979Gl07 and upper limit from RDM in 1974Br04. Other: 0.9 ps {I+5-3} from DSAM in 1978Li13, but it is inconsistent with T{-1/2}>1 ps from RUL of 176|g assuming Mult(176|g)=M1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$deformation parameters: |d=0.26 {I4} and |g=19 deg 2 from B(M1)|^ for 3740 and 5643 transitions (1995Ka58,1996Is04,2002IsZY). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$rounded value from Adopted Levels 
T$weighted average of 4.64 ps {I42} (1981Ca10), 4.9 ps {I15} (1963Ak03), and 4.2 ps {I14} (1958Kn36). Other: 2.5 ps {I11} from 1964Bo22 is discrepant. 
T$other: 4.64 ps {I35} (1977Ca14; superseded by 1981Ca10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E,T$from 1963Ak03, with T{-1/2} determined from dependence of cross section for resonance scattering of 983|g, following |b+ and 1320|g decay of {+48}V versus T of gaseous source, assuming T{-1/2}(983)=4.9 ps {I16} (1963Ak03). Other T{-1/2}: 0.15 ps {I+6-4} from 1964Bo22 is discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G (eV)=0.0101 {I10} 
S$weighted average of 0.0096 eV {I10} (1976Ra03), 0.012 eV {I2} (1990De20), and 0.010 eV {I+2-1} (1996Is04). Other: 0.010 eV {I3} (1995IsZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G (eV)=0.060 {I4} 
S$weighted average of 0.066 eV {I4} (1976Ra03), 0.058 eV {I7} (1990De20), and 0.054 eV {I4} (1996Is04). Other: 0.054 eV {I5} (1995IsZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G (eV)=0.041 {I15} 
S$weighted average of 0.070 eV {I20} (1990De20) and 0.034 eV {I10} (1995IsZW). Other: 0.023 eV {I4} (1996Is04) is discrepant with the value from 1990De20 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G (eV)=0.191 {I20} 
S$weighted average of 0.174 eV {I20} (1996Is04), 0.20 eV {I7} (1990De20), and 0.208 eV {I20} (1995IsZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G (eV)=0.173 {I10} 
T$2.64 fs {I15} if |G{-0}/|G=1.0 
S$from 1995IsZW. Other: 0.16 eV {I6} (1990De20); note that 0.056 eV {I10} (1996Is04) is discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
$|G{+2}{-0}/|G (eV)=0.52 {I18} 
T$from resonance |s versus temperature (1983Mo06). Other: 0.92 eV {I32} from |G{+2}{-0}/|G and adopted branching ratios. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$unweighted average of 28 fs {I12} (1989Ge05), 13.9 fs {I28} (1993Ko57) and 31.9 fs {I21} (1993BeZL) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$unweighted average of 13.2 fs {I14} (1993BeZL) and 9.0 fs {I14} (1989Ge05). Other: 29.1 fs {I56} (1993Ko57) is discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 9.0 fs {I21} (1993BeZL), 13.9 fs {I28} (1993Ko57), and 14.6 fs {I42} (1989Ge05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 984 {I5} (1989Hi05) and 981 {I4} (1961Ha41). Others: 985 (1969Lu04), 980 {I80} (1967Ri02), 985 {I10} (1965Be09) 
S$other: 0.20 (1984Wo03), 0.22 {I3} (1969Lu04), 0.26 (1967Er03) 
$|s=33.3 mb (1969Lu04) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=9 mb/sr {I2} (1967Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2295 {I5} (1989Hi05), 2301 {I10} (1965Be09), and 2293 {I8} (1961Ha41). Other: 2301 (1969Lu04) 
$|s=2.7 mb (1969Lu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2421 {I5} (1989Hi05), 2425 {I10} (1965Be09), and 2420 {I8} (1961Ha41). Others: 2425 (1969Lu04), 2500 {I200} (1967Ri02) 
$|s=2.6 mb (1969Lu04) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=0.9 mb/sr {I2} (1967Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2997 {I5} (1989Hi05) and 3004 {I10} (1965Be09). Other: 3004 (1969Lu04) 
$|s=1.9 mb (1969Lu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1965Be09. It is indicated by 1965Be09 that their 3230 and 3248 levels correspond to the 3229 and 3240 levels from previous work. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$other: 3365 (1969Lu04), 3600 {I100} (1967Ri02) 
S$other: 0.18 {I3} (1969Lu04) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=2.4 mb/sr {I2} (1967Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3618 {I5} (1989Hi05) and 3625 {I10} (1965Be09). Other: 3625 (1969Lu04) 
$|s=1.8 mb (1969Lu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3702 {I5} (1989Hi05) and 3707 {I10} (1965Be09). Other: 3707 (1969Lu04) 
$|s=1.2 mb (1969Lu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$other: 4590 (1969Lu04), 4500 {I200} (1967Ri02) 
S$other: 0.17 {3} (1969Lu04) 
$|s=4.8 mb (1969Lu04) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=1.2 mb/sr {I2} (1967Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$other: 5620 (1989Wi13), 5630 (1969Lu04), 5600 {I200} (1967Ri02) 
L$other: L=2&(0) from 1989Wi13 
$|s=3.1 mb (1969Lu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$other: 6380 (1989Wi13), 6360 (1969Lu04) 
$d|s/d|W(3|')=70 |mb/sr {I7} (1989Wi13) 
$|s=1.5 mb (1969Lu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$other: 6470 (1969Lu04), 6400 {I200} (1967Ri02) 
L,S$other: 0.09 {2} for L=2 (1969Lu04) 
$|s=2.3 mb (1969Lu04) 
$d|s/d|W(max)=2.1 mb/sr {I3} (1967Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 2420.6 {I3} (1978DeYT). 
T$weighted average of 11 fs {I+7-11} (1969Ka10), 24 fs {I5} (1973Ba02), and 19 fs {I+11-9} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 2997.4 {I4} (1978DeYT). 
T$weighted average of 87 fs {I21} (1969Ka10), 111 fs {I22} (1973Ba02), and 194 fs {I+76-49} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 3223.1 {I5} (1978DeYT). 
J$2,3 from p|g(|q) (1969Mo09), in contradiction to the definite J=4 assignment made by 1957Va08 on the basis of |g|g(|q) following {+48}V |b{++} decay. 1969Mo09 thus propose existence of a doublet near 3224. However, a careful combined |b{++} decay and (p,p') experiment by 1973Ba02 suggests same state is populated in both ways, and that all data available are consistent with 3+ assignment. |p=+ from M1+E2 |g to 2+ (evaluator). 
T$weighted average of 17 fs {I+9-11} (1969Ka10), 29 fs {I+13-10} (1973Ba02), and 31 fs {I+14-12} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 3240.0 {I3} (1978DeYT). 
T$weighted average of 69 fs {I+37-29} (1969Ka10), 30 fs {I+14-11} (1973Ba02), and 62 fs {I+28-21} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$from 1978DeYT. 
T$from 1969Ka10. Note that the value obtained for T{-1/2} is strongly at variance with recoil-distance measurement made using (|a,p|g) reaction. 
$1973Ba02 find no evidence for |g decay of this level, but |g's were reported by 1978DeYT. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 3359.3 {I4} (1978DeYT). 
T$weighted average of 173 fs {I+38-34} (1969Ka10), 243 fs {I62} (1973Ba02), and 173 fs {I+55-42} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 3369.8 {I3} (1978DeYT). 
T$weighted average of 15 fs {I9} (1969Ka10), 12 fs {I5} (1973Ba02), and 30 fs {I+13-9} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$other: 3633 {I2} (1969Mo09), 3630 (1969Ka10). Since the 3868 level is determined as the same as the 3852 level in 1978DeYT, the 3633 level from 1969Mo09 should match the 3615 level in 1978DeYT, same for the 3630 level in 1969Ka10, as also pointed out by 1993Ko57 in (n,n'|g) 
T$other: 10.3 fs {I26} from 1969Ka10 is discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin from p|g(|q) (1968Mo20). 2714.9|g M1+E2 to 2+ discrepant with adopted |p=-. 
T$from 1969Ka10. Other: 24 fs {I+28-21} (1978DeYT). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$other: 3750 {I5} from 1969Mo09. 
T$112 fs (1978DeYT) and 11 fs {I3} (1969Ka10) are mutually discrepant and also discrepant with the adopted value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
T$discrepant with adopted value of 1.2 ps {I+11-6}. Asymmetric uncertainty listed by 1978DeYT appears to be in error since no negative component given; positive component=163. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$from 1974Ba74. Others: 1975Ba64 report |b{-L}(vib)=0.16, |b{-L}(rot)=0.19 from Coupled-Channel analysis; 0.185 (1970Ve06); 0.24 (1968Ha31); 1968Hi09 report 0.21, 0.26 and 0.22 for different couplings. 
$d|s/d|W(max)=1.80 mb/sr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 990 (1970Br07), 984 (1968Be23) 
L$also from 1967Yn01, 1968Be23 
S$others: 0.20 at E|a=40 MeV and 0.19 at 45 MeV (1994Ra29); 1967Yn01 report 0.187, 0.191 and 0.193 for 3 different potentials 
$|d{-2}=0.81 fm (1970Br07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 3813 (1967Yn01), 3820 (1970Br07), 3850 (1968Be23) 
L$also from 1967Yn01, 1968Be23 
S$others: 0.061, 0.063 and 0.063 for 3 different potentials (1967Yn01) 
$|d{-3}=0.32 fm (1970Br07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E,L$others: 4380 with L=3 from 1970Br07 (also 1967Br25), B(E3)=1.05|*10{+-4}; 4390 (1968Be23). 1968Be23 consider the 4380, L=3 level from 1967Br25 the same level as the 4590, L=3 in their work and the 4522, L=3 level in 1967Yn01 
$|d{-3}=0.28 fm (1970Br07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 4522 (1967Yn01), 4590 (1968Be23). See also the comment for 4384 level. 
L$also from 1967Yn01, 1968Be23 
S$other: 0.068 (1967Yn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 5290 (1967Yn01, 1970Br07), 5340 (1968Be23) 
L$(4,2) from 1973Ja18, 4 from 1967Yn01, (4) from 1968Be23 
S$for L=4 (1973Ja18). Other: 0.042 (1967Yn01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$%EWSR=87 {I11} 
E$from 16.94|*10{+3} {I+17-14} in 2006To10 symmetrized. Other: 16.2|*10{+3} {+4} (1981Yo04), 18.0|*10{+3} {I5} (1976Yo02), 17.7|*10{+3} {I3} (1975Ar16) 
S$for E2 strength (ISGQR). Other: 4.5 MeV {I5} (1981Yo04), 6.6 MeV {I4} (1976Yo02) 
$Centroid=17.47 MeV {I20}, with %EWSR=83 {I11} and width=7.62 MeV {I12} from a single Gaussian fit to the E2 distribution (2006To10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MEV
level_comment:
$%EWSR=97 {I13} 
E$from 18.80|*10{+3} {I+45-18} in 2006To10 symmetrized 
S$for E0 strength (ISGMR); from 96 {I+14-12} symmetrized 
$Centroid=18.73 MeV {I23}, with %EWSR=84 {I11} and width=8.28 MeV {I5} from a single Gaussian fit to the E0 distribution (2006To10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J J=7/2 from electron paramagnetic resonance and NMR (1976Fu06; 1962Wa03,1953Je16). |p=- from L=3 in stripping and pickup 
MOMM1,MOME2$NMR ({+39}K standard) and AB (no pol correction. Reevaluated by 1999Bi11), respectively. Other Q: 0.324 {I3} (1992Be68. LRSRD). See (e,e) for theoretical estimates of higher magnetic moments. Other: g-factor=0.24005 from comparison of theoretical and experimental NMR spectra for Ti metallic oxide (1986Eb02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(d,p)=1 and Coul. ex. 
T from B(E2)|_ in Coul. ex. other: 0.97 ps {I+83-35} from Doppler broadening of |g's in (n,|g) 
MOMM3,MOME4$ABLFS 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}>5.5 ps, T{-1/2}<7.6 ps 
T lower limit from lack of Coul. ex.; upper limit from |g(t) in (d,p|g). Other: 1.3 ps {I+13-3} from Doppler broadening of |g's in (n,|g) 
Possible doublet. See discussion in ({+3}He,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J from coupled-reaction-channel analysis assuming (({+50}Ti 2+)(|N 1f{-7/2}){+-1}). ({+3}He,{+3}He'a) and ({+3}He,|a'a) considered. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2 to 9/2,11/2- from D,E2 |g to 7/2-. 5/2- to 19/2- from L(t,|a)=3. {I3}/2+,5/2 to 9/2,11/2+ from 8885 resonance primary |g. Jp({+49}V,8071)=(5/2) 
T weighted av from (|g,|g') and DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T weighted av (ext.) of 20.1 fs {I14} from Doppler broadening of |g's in (n,|g) and 25 fs {I3} from (|g,|g'). Other: 36 fs {I8} from DSAM in (p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
J 15/2 from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g). |p=- from L(p)=3 in (t,|a) 
$T{-1/2}>3.5 ps, T{-1/2}<6.9 ns 
T lower limit from DSAM in (|a,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+,13/2,15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2 to 13/2,15/2- from D,E2 |g to 11/2-. J|p>(11/2+) from lack of decay to states with J|p<7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
2722, L=4, state in (d,|a),(pol d,|a) and 2724, L=(3), state in (t,|a) may correspond to this or the previous state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 7/2- to 19/2- from |s(|q) and VAP in (d,|a),(pol d,|a). 13/2 to 17/2 from |g(|q)(785|g) in (|a,3n|g). Lack of crossover transitions to J|p<15/2- suggests 17/2- 
T from DSAM in (|a,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J from comparison of VAP to empirical curves in (pol d,p) and |g-CP in (pol n,|g). Note that 1972Ba18 suggested that this state was a doublet; see (t,p) and (d,p) for discussion. This suggestion has not been confirmed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E unweighted av from (t,p), (|g,|g'), and (d,|a) assuming the same state is populated 
J 3/2+,5/2 to 9/2,11/2+ from D,E2 |g from 7/2+. 7/2- to 19/2- from |s(|q) and VAP in (d,|a). Correspondence of states not definite 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: +
level_comment:
J L(t,|a)=2 
3749 {I12} in (d,p), 3749 {I4}, 5/2 to 9/2, in (|g,|g'), and 3746.5 {I6} in (p,p'|g) probably correspond to this or the following state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
E from (d,|a) 
J 7/2- to 19/2- from |s(|q) and VAP in (d,|A),(pol d,|a). Note: J|p=15/2- from comparison of (1f{-7/2}){+n}, zero-order plane-wave approximation, calculations to |s(|q) in (p,|p{+-}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
J L(t,p)=2 for both these states. 4331, L(p,d)=3, may Be a different state or correspond to one or both of these states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J |g(|q)(1092|g) in (|a,3n|g) gives |DJ<1 to (17/2)-. |p=- from L(d,|a)=6. Lack of crossover transitions implies J|p=(19/2)- 
T from DSAM in (|a,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J L({+3}He,|a)=2. {I9}/2+ from comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p) discrepant. However, 1972Ko41 assumed L(d,p)=4 from 1967Ba32 who noted that the DWBA fit to |s(|q) was poor at forward angles and justified L(d,p)=4 from systematics in the region 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J J=7/2 from 8884|g(|q); |p=+ from E1 |g to 7/2-. |s{-n}(|q) consistent with theory for 7/2-(E1)7/2+(L=4)0+, confirming assignment 
WIDTHG,WIDTHN,WIDTHG0$from (|g,|g'),(|g,n) 
%IT,%N From |G{-n} and |G{-|g} 
726, L=4, neutron group to {+48}Ti g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J,L L=3 from |s(|q) but VAP not consistent with strong 5/2- or 7/2- transitions (1972Ko41). 1972Ko41 suggest that |s(|q) is non-stripping 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
Possible doublet. See the Adopted Levels. This may explain the relatively poor agreement for this state with (n,|g) data of 1983Ru08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
Suggestion of a doublet (1972Ba18) based on comparison of (d,p) and (t,p) data does not appear to be confirmed in any other measurement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T from |G{-|g}+|G{-n} (evaluator) 
WIDTHG0,WIDTHG,WIDTHN$|G{-|g0} is the weighted av (int.) of 0.33 eV {I4} (1981Be44) and 0.39 eV {I5} (1988BeYX) and |G{-|g}, 2.54 eV {I80} (1981Be44) and 1.85 eV {I50} (1988BeYX). See also discussion above 
726, L=4, neutron group to {+48}Ti g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
Weak 582 neutron group ascribed to transition to the 983-keV state in {+48}Ti; induced by a 9720|g from Cr(n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
L=1 in earlier pickup and stripping work ({Ie.g.} 1970Pl03); however, |s(|q) may also be fit by L=0. 1978Fo34 suggest that this is either a 3/2- and 1/2+ doublet or may be excited by reaction mechanism other than single-step 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
2.5- and |?2.52-MeV, 0 and (3,2), doublet (1970Pl03) may correspond to 2.47- and 2.50-MeV states. Group of unresolved states also observed by 1969An04 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E from 1978Ko27 (E(d)|?8.72 MeV; Q3D, |a(P), scin). Others: 8733 15 (1978Fo34) and 8750 {I15} (1970Pl03). IAS(49Sc g.s.) 
COULOMB DISPLACEMENT ENERGY=7503 7 (1978Ko27). OTHERS: SEE 1995Bu23 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 1553.8|g to 0+; L(|a,|a')=L(e,e')=2 
MOMM1$from g=+1.444 {I77} from transient magnetic fields in Coulomb excitation in inverse kinematics (2000Sp08) using T{-1/2}=1.12 ps for level half-life. Others: +2.2 {I22} (2003Sp04, same group as 2000Sp08), 2.68 {I84} (quoted by 1989Ra17 from D.Phil. thesis by B.J. Murphy, Oxford,1980; using T{-1/2}=0.97 ps). 
MOME2$reorientation method in Coul. ex. (1975To06). Other: -0.02 {I9} (1970Ha24) 
$Evaluated rms charge radius: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=3.5704 fm {I22} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+50}Ti,{+48}Ti)=-0.160 fm{+2} {I7} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 1121.1|g to 2+; L(|a,|a')=L(p,p')=4 from 0+ 
T$from RDM in ({+6}Li,3np|g). Other: <2.8 ns from |g(t) in (d,p|g); 6.22 ps {I+21-19} from B(E4)(W.u.) in (e,e') 
$B(E4)(W.u.)=4.70 {I15} (1971He08) in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 523.8|g to 4+; L(p,p')=6 from 0+ 
T$|b|g(t) in {+50}Sc |b{+-} decay. Other: <2.8 ns from |g(t) in (d,p|g) 
MOMM1$g=+1.57 {I17} measured using integral perturbed angular distribution (IPAD) method in (|a,2n|g) (1976Bo25). +9.3 {I10} in 2014StZZ compilation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole; |p=+ from L(d,p)=1; also L(p,p')=4 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole. Parity from L(d,p)=1 which gives J|p=2 to 5, |p=+; L(d,{+3}He)=3 giving J=0 to 7, |p=+; and 1+,2+,3+ from L=2 in (p,p'), ({+3}He,{+3}He') and (|a,|a') for 4172 doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=(2) from 0+. 2+ from calculations of 1978Jo06. See also comment for 4171.96 level 
T$other: |<0.2 ps DSAM in (t,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=L(e,e')=L(t,p)=2 from 0+, L(d,p)=1 from 7/2-; 4309.7|g to 0+ 
T$from B(E2)|^=0.0051 {I8} in (e,e') and adopted branching ratios. Others: 0.7 fs<T{-1/2}<4.2 fs from |G{-|g0} in (|g,|g') and 4.3 fs from B(E2)|^ in (p,p'),({+3}He,{+3}He),(|a,|a'); <2.8 ps from |g(t) in (d,p|g) and |<60 fs from DSAM in (t,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(d,{+3}He)=0 from 7/2-; L(e,e')=L(|a,|a')=3 from 0+ 
T$from |g(t) in (d,p|g). 
$B(E3)(W.u.)=3.76 {I15} from (e,e') (1971He08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=1 from 7/2-; L(p,p')=2 from 0+; 4789.3|g to 0+. But L(|a,|a')=4 from 0+ is inconsistent and could indicate a separate level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole; |p from L(d,p)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$ spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole; |p from L(d,p)=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5,6)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5346 {I8} (d,p); 5329 {I5} (p,p'); 5333 {I8} (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=2 from 7/2-; L(p,p')=5,6 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$ spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole; |p from L(d,p)=1; also L(p,p')=4 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+,5+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.7 from 5+ parent; L(p,p')=4 from 0+; L(d,p)=1+3 from 7/2-; primary |g from 3-,4- n-capture state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$ spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole; |p from L(d,p)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
E$from (d,p|g). Others: 6068 {I15} from (t,p), 6079 {I20} from (d,p) 
J$ L(t,p)=2 from 0+; L(d,p)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$2924.0|g to 6+, 1636.5|g to (2+); D,E2 |g rays to 1-,2+ and 6+; spin=(3,4,5) from nuclear orientation and CP in (n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, M1+E2 2937.6|g to 6+. But L(d,p)=1+3 from 7/2- for a level at 6138 is inconsistent; it could be for the 6123 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4+)
level_comment:
J$ spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole. 4602.5|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6176 {I20} in (d,p), 6166 {I5} in (p,p) and 6191 {I9} in (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3 and L(d,p)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1:6)(-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6207 {I15} from (t,p), 6210 {I20} from (d,p), and 6213 {I5} from (p,p') 
J$L(d,p)=(2) from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6250 {I6} from (d,p) and 6248 {I9} from (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$spin from nuclear orientation and circ pol in (n,|g) assuming the primary |g rays are dipole; |p=+ from L(d,{+3}He)=1; also L(p,p')=4 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6756 {I15} from (t,p) and 6770 {I10} from (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6992 {I15} from (t,p), 6986 {I20} from (d,p), 6975 {I5} from (p,p'), and 6963 {I10} from (d,{+3}He) 
J$L(d,{+3}He)=0 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
J$L(p,p')=3 from 0+; L(d,{+3}He)=2 from 7/2-; 4402.1|g to 4+ and 5525.5|g to 2+. But L(d,p)=3 from 7/2- for a level at 7978 is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 7701 {I15} (t,p), 7700 {I10} (p,p') and 7697 {I11} (d,{+3}He) 
J$ L(p,p')=3 from 0+; L(d,{+3}He)=(0) from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 8720 {I2} from (e,e') and 8726 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$L(p,p')=(1) from 0+; M2,(E3) excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 8890 {I2} from (e,e') and 8881 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ L(p,p')=3; Q,(E3) excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 8980 {I2} from (e,e') and 8971 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ L(p,p')=3 from 0+; (E3) excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 9370 {I2} from (e,e') and 9367 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ M1,(Q) excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 9930 {I2} from (e,e') and 9964 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ L(p,p')=0 from 0+; M1 excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 10030 {I2} from (e,e'), and 10049 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$M1+E3 excitation in (e,e'); L(p,p')=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 10170 {I2} from (e,e'), and 10160 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ M1 excitation in (e,e'); L(p,p')=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 10210 {I2} from (e,e'), and 10205 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ L(p,p')=0 from 0+; E1,(M1) excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,2-,3-)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 10250 {I2} from (e,e'), and 10237 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$E3,(M1,M2) excitation in (e,e') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 10330 {I2} from (e,e'), and 10364 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ M1 excitation in (e,e'); L(p,p')=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 10450 {I2} from (e,e') and 10478 {I10} from (p,p') 
J$ M1 excitation in (e,e'); L(p,p')=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$S(n) from 2017Wa10; held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
J$s-wave neutron capture on a 7/2- target. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_comment:
J$9+ or 11+ from analysis in 1979St13, the latter favored by two-point excitation function in 1979St13 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$1560 from 1967Yn01. 1550|g in 1972LaYB 
S$|b{-2}=0.13 from 1971Mo39 assuming (f{-7/2}){+2} wave function. Others: |b{-2}=0.13 {i1} (1974Re01), 0.18 {i2} (1974Al10), and 0.136 (1967Yn01); |b{-2}R=0.34 (1992KuZG) 
$ |g(|q) indicative of "half" spin flip (1970Hi01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
E$2660 from 1967Yn01. 
S$others: |b{-4}=0.06 {i1} (1974Re01) and 0.073 (1967Yn01); |b{-4}R=0.30 (1992KuZG) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)|^=0.0315 {I30} (1975To06), 0.0330 {I30} (1970Ha24), 0.0173 {I35} (1967Af03), 0.0260 {I20} (0.024 {I2} in 1965Si02 reanalyzed by 1970Ha24), 0.040 {I8} (1962Va22, uncertainty assigned in 2001Ra27 evaluation). All the B(E2) values are from Coulomb excitation cross sections. Value from 1967Af03 seems discrepant 
T$from DSAM (2000Sp08). Other: 0.76 ps 10 (1972WaYZ, DSAM) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$NC{+2}S{-1}C{+2}S{-2}=1.44 
E$some evidence for multistep excitation in ({+14}C,{+16}O) (1979Pe08); reaction to g.s. followed by inelastic scattering. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=1.73 ps {I20} from DSAM (2003Sp04) 
$g factor from transient magnetic field method 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$assignment from 2021Bo21. J=(3,4)+ in {+50}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, but 3+ is ruled out by confirmed |b feeding from 5+ in the present work 
$B(>)=0.756 {I36} (2021Bo21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3,4)+
level_comment:
J$(4+) in {+50}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database based on a tentative 2348.3|g to 6+ state, but this |g has not been confirmed by 2021Bo21. Observed |b feeding by 2021Bo21 gives J=4 is this feeding is from the decay of the 5+ g.s. {+50}Sc, or 2+,3+ if the feeding is from the 2+ isomer of {+50}Sc. 
$B(>)=0.0287 {I43} (2021Bo21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)+
level_comment:
$B(>)=16.9 {I16} (2021Bo21) 
E$a previously reported 1636|g in (n,|g) (1984Ru06: Nucl. Phys. A419, 439) from this level was not confirmed by 2021Bo21. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$(2,3,4+) in {+50}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, but 2+ and 3+ are ruled out by confirmed |b feeding from 5+ in the present work 
$B(>)=3.46 {I33} (2021Bo21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
$This level is most likely directly populated by |b feeding from the isomer, as the observed |b feeding is inconsistent with |b feeding from the ground-state decay of {+50}Sc with J|p=5+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T from weighted av of 5.752 min {I7} (1969IsZZ), 5.80 min {I3} (1955Bu01), and 5.79 min {I3} (1953Sa11). 
J$L(d,p)=1 from 0+; L(t,p)=2 from 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(11/2) from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). |p=- from E2 |g to 5/2-. 
T From recoil distance in {+48}Ca({+6}Li,2np|g),({+7}Li,3np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(15/2) from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). J=(15/2-) from shell-model calculation. 
T From recoil distance in {+48}Ca({+6}Li,2np|g),({+7}Li,3np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,3/2+)
level_comment:
S$for d{-5/2}, 0.049 {I6} for d{-3/2}. Other: 0.029 {I4} for d{-5/2}, 0.042 {I5} for d{-3/2} with ADW calculation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,1/2-)
level_comment:
S$for p{-3/2}, 0.040 {I5} for p{-1/2}. Other: 0.015 {I2} for p{-3/2}, 0.031 {I4} for p{-1/2} with ADW calculation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,3/2+)
level_comment:
S$for d{-5/2}, 0.094 {I5} for d{-3/2}. Other: 0.055 {I7} for d{-5/2}, 0.080 {I4} for d{-3/2} with ADW calculation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,1/2-)
level_comment:
S$for p{-3/2}, 0.037 {I5} for p{-1/2}. Other: 0.014 {I2} for p{-3/2}, 0.030 {I4} for p{-1/2} with ADW calculation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,1/2-)
level_comment:
S$for p{-3/2}, 0.028 {I4} for p{-1/2}. Other: 0.010 {I1} for p{-3/2}, 0.021 {I3} for p{-1/2} with ADW calculation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2 B(E2)=0.0567 {I51} (2005Di05). 
T from {+12}C({+48}Ca,{+8}Be|g) (2006Sp02). Others: 3.9 ps 4 from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation and 3.3 ps {I+56-15} DSAM in {+50}Ti(t,p|g). 
J L(t,p)=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T based on RDM using the 1267-keV |g. The lifetime of the 2317-keV level was assumed too short to affect the result. The decay data obtained are consistent with this assumption. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$From 2.1 s {I10} (2010Cr02). Other: 1.5 s {I4} (1996Do23). 
Mass excess=-45.61 MEV 16 (1993Au05). Others: mass excess=-45.76 MEV 23 (1994Se12), -45.48 MEV 22 (1990Tu01), -45.43 MEV (syst) (1985Wa02). -45.51 MEV (1976Da02), -45.6 MEV (1974Se01), -45.82 MEV (1969Ga32), -45.75 MEV (1967Ze05). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
E$new level proposed in 2017Ri09 from the placement of a newly-observed 1264|g feeding the 2517,(2+) level on the basis of I|g(1264|g) significantly larger than I|g(1000|g) from 2495 level 
J$tentatively assigned by 2017Ri09 based on its large (p,p') cross section, 1264|g to (2+) and systematics of neighboring nuclei for low- energy octupole state that is concentrated in the 3- state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 2003Ma56 (authors' average of three values: 1.2 s {I4} from (fragment)|b decay curve, 1.34 s {I10} from (fragment)|b(323|g) decay curve, and 1.32 s {I10} from (fragment)|b(673|g) decay at NSCL-MSU). Others: 0.32 s {I6} (1998Am04, implants-|b correlations at GSI); and 0.60 s {I4} (1996Do23, 0.62 s {I6} from implants-|b and 0.58 s {I5} from implants-|b|g at GANIL) are in disagreement with that from 2003Ma56, where |g selectivity gives a more reliable value. 
$1995AmZX and 1997AmZZ for T{-1/2} of {+55}Ti decay superseded by 1998Am04; and 1995SoZX for T{-1/2} superseded by 1996Do23 
J$L(n)=1 momentum distribution in {+9}Be({+56}Ti,{+55}Ti|g) from |np{-1/2} orbital, and comparison with shell-model calculations 
$Dominant configuration=[|p(f{-7/2}{+2})|n(f{-7/2}{+8}, p{-3/2}{+4})]{-0+}~#|np{-1/2}{+1} (2007Zh36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$591.7|g to (1/2)-; 1554|g from (9/2-) 
$Dominant configuration=[|p(f{-7/2}{+2})~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8},p{-3/2}{+4})] {-0+}~#|nf{-5/2}{+1} (2007Zh36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
J$L(n)=1 momentum distribution in {+9}Be({+56}Ti,{+55}Ti|g) from |np{-3/2} orbital, and comparison with shell-model calculations 
$Dominant configuration=[|p(f{-7/2}{+2})~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8},p{-3/2}{+4})] {-0+}~#|np{-3/2}{+1} (2007Zh36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
$Dominant configurations of 3p-3h state= |pf{-7/2}{+2}~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8}p{-3/2}{+3}p{-1/2}{+1}f{-5/2}{+1}) and |pf{-7/2}{+2}~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8}p{-3/2}{+4}f{-5/2}{+1}) (2007Zh36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_comment:
$Dominant configuration= |pf{-7/2}{+2}~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8}p{-3/2}{+3}p{-1/2}{+1}f{-5/2}{+1}) (2007Zh36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
$Dominant configurations of 3p-3h state= |pf{-7/2}{+2}~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8}p{-3/2}{+3}p{-1/2}{+1}f{-5/2}{+1}) and |pf{-7/2}{+2}~#|n(f{-7/2}{+8}p{-3/2}{+4}f{-5/2}{+1}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J$L(n)=1 momentum distribution in knock-out from |np{-1/2} orbital 
$Dominant configuration=|np{-1/2}{+-1} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$from E|g 
J$L(n)=1 exclusive momentum distribution in knock-out from |np{-3/2} orbital 
$Dominant configuration=|np{-3/2}{+-1} 
$Measured exclusive |s=22 mb {I6} (2009Ma16); may include significant contributions from higher-lying states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$(0,1,2)+ proposed by 2010Cr02 based on |b feeding from (1+). However, evaluator considers the observed |b feeding as an apparent value only. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$S(n)({+56}Ti)+y, where y<8250 {I300}, from Q(|b{+-})({+56}Sc)-S(n)({+56}Ti); Q(|b{+-})=13910 {I300}, S(n)=5660 {I100} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=364 ms, %|b{+-}n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=321 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.23, 0.12 (2021Mi17). 
$No evidence for |b-delayed neutron decay from search for |g rays from the decay of {+56}Ti to {+55}V (2003Ma56), consistent with predicted %|b{+-}n=0 in 2019Mo01, and %|b{+-}n=0.23, 0.12 in 2021Mi17 
T$from 2003Ma56 (|b|g-coin decay curves). Others: 0.15 s {I3} (1996Do23) and 0.19 s {I4} (1998Am04) are in agreement within the uncertainties, but less precise 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$750.9|g to (2+) suggests 0+ to 4+. If allowed |b feeding from (1+) parent state, as suggested by 2010Cr02 is proved, then J|p=0+,1+,2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E,J$from the Adopted Levels. Uncertainty from that in E|g value. 
T$deduced by evaluator from B(E2)(up) measured by 2005Di05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%B-N$0.04 (1997Mo25), |?0.6 (1996Do23); both are from theoretical calculations 
J$ prediction from shell-model calculations using GXPF1 interaction in full {Ipf} model space (2005Li53). Possible allowed |b feeding to (7/2-) in {+57}V is consistent. Others: 5/2- proposed from systematics (2003Au02); 3/2- from calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$ from 2005Li53, deduced from fit of the fragment-|b-decay curve considering the exponential decay of the parent, exponential growth, and decay of the daughter {+57}V, and a linear background term. The value obtained was compared with that obtained from fragment-|b-|g decay curves for each of the |g rays assigned to the decay of {+57}Ti. The values were consistent with 98 ms, within the uncertainties. Others: 67 ms {I25} (1999So20, 55 ms {I20} in earlier 1995SoZX report), 180 ms {I30} (1998Am04, 0.18 s {I4} in earlier 1995AmZX report); 56 ms {I20} (1996Do23). Weighted average of values from 2005Li53, 1999So20, 1998Am04 and 1996Do23 is 97 ms {I10} with reduced |h{+2}=4.4. See 1998Am04 and 1996Do23 for a comparison of their measurements of T{-1/2} with theoretical estimates using different models. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 57 ms {I10} (2011Da08,2002MaZN, from time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events with the inclusion of parameters for |b-detection efficiency, background rate, mother, daughter and grand-daughter half-lives); 59 ms {I9} (2005Ga01,2003So21, from |b(fragment) timing correlations of 128 implanted events. Other: 47 ms {I10} (1999So20, earlier value from the same group as 2003So21, 2005Ga01). Weighted average of all three values is 55 ms {I9}, using the lowest uncertainty in the dataset 
$Measured production cross section=2.8 nb (1992We04) 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=1.1 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$ from systematics of even-even nuclides, energy consistent with shell-model predictions (2008Ao01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$Deduced deformation length=0.83 fm {I+22-30}, |b{-2}=0.18 {I+5-6} (2013Su20) from distorted-wave theory analysis of (p,p') data in inverse kinematics, using ECIS97 computer code 
$|s=13 mb {I7} (2013Su20) for population of first 2+ state 
$Population=34% {I16} (2013Su20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$|b{-2} was determined from the relation |b{-2}=|d{-p,p'}/R, where R=r{-0}A{-1/3} with r{-0}=1.2, and the deformation length |d{-p,p'}=0.83 fm {I+22-30} determined using the ECIS97 code 
$Excitation cross section=13 mb {I7} (2013Su20) for first 2+ state. Uncertainty include statistical (31%), target thickness (5%), g| ray detection efficiency (4%), and cascade subtraction (16%) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$From systematics of {+55}Ti and {+57}Ti nuclei. 
T$Weighted average of 27.5 ms {I25} (2011Da08) and 30 ms {I3} (2005Ga01). Uncertainty - lower input value. Other: 58 ms {I17} (1999So20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$Proposed in 2012Ka36, assuming 113.3|g E2 to (5/2-) g.s. 
T$Weighted average of 587 ns {I+57-51} (2012Ka36 - ({+238}U,X|g)), 590 ns {I130} (2005Ga01 - ({+76}Ga,X|g)), and 600 ns {I50} (2002MaZN - ({+86}Kr,X|g)). Uncertainty is the lowest input value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$Proposed in 2005Ga01 from shell model calculation. 
T$ from |b(t) (2005Ga01) 
$ Number of implanted fragments=424 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$ Number of implanted fragments=1.1|*10{+4} 
J$Proposed in 2012Ka36, assuming 109.0|g E2 to (5/2-) g.s. 
T$ From |g(t) (2012Ka36) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ based on time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events in the DSSSD. Fitting procedure included five parameters: |b-detection efficiency, background rate, mother, daughter and grand-daughter half-lives (2002MaZN, 2011Da08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
E,J$Proposed [M2] isomer feeding the 5/2- state. If 1st exited state were considered to be 5/2-, then level energy would be 813 keV (2002MaZN). Not mentioned/discussed in primary publication (2011Da08) of 2002MaZN work. Not adopted by evaluator. 
T$ from |g(t) (2002MaZN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=892 ns {I18} from (implants)(|g) correlated decay curve (2019Wi04). This value can be compared to T{-1/2}=594 ns {I50} in {+59}Ti Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (April 2018 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ based on time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events (2011Da08). Other value: 22 ms 2 (2005Ga01,2003So21). 
Fitting procedure included five parameters: |b-detection efficiency, background rate, mother, daughter and granddaughter half-lives (2011Da08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 22.4 ms {I25} (2011Da08, from time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events), and 22 ms {I2} (2005Ga01, 2003So21) 
$Theoretical %|b{+-}n=1.62, %|b{+-}2n=0 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Percent=29 {I12} 
$Percent population includes contribution from unobserved levels which do not feed the first 2+ and 4+ states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=22.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=2.5, %|b{+-}2n=0.8 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=19.8 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.3, %|b{+-}2n=0.4 (2016Ma12) 
T$from 2011Da08, based on time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events in the DSSSD. Fitting procedure included five parameters: |b-detection efficiency, background rate, mother, daughter and granddaughter half-lives 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Measured cross section=0.54 pb {I11} using Be target, as per the e-mail of Nov 11, 2009 from O. Tarasov (first author of 2009Ta24, 2009Ta05) 
E$ fragment observed by 2009Ta24 is assumed to be in the ground state of {+62}Ti. 
T$ lower limit from time-of-flight=620-650 ns, as communicated to the evaluators in an e-mail of Sept 23, 2009 from the first author of 2009Ta24, 2009Ta05. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by a systematic value of 10 ms (2011AuZY) and calculated value of 18 ms (1997Mo25) 
$Calculated (1997Mo25) %|b{+-}n=4, |b{+-}2n=0.13 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}=?; %|b{+-}n=? 
$|s=10{+-11} mb {I+2-1} (read by the evaluator from figure 2 of 2009Ta05 and also figure 8 and 9 of 2009Ta24). 
E$ fragment observed by 2009Ta05 is assumed to be in the ground state of {+63}Ti. 
J$ 1/2- (syst,2021Ko07), 9/2+ (theory,2019Mo01) 
T$ >360 ns estimated from time-of-flight of |?360 ns for {+60}Ge and {+64}Se as in 2005St29 (from the same lab as 2009Ta05). Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by systematics value of 10 ms (2021Ko07) and calculated values from 2019Mo01 and 2021Mi17. 
$ Calculated %|b{+-}1n=32, %|b{+-}2n=3 (2019Mo01) 
$ Calculated %|b{+-}1n=12.03, %|b{+-}2n=2.17, %|b{+-}3n=0.004 (2021Mi17) 
$ Calculated T{-1/2}(|b decay)=12.3 ms (2019Mo01), 11.1 ms (2021Mi17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, accompanied by delayed neutron decays, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=9.5 ms, %|b{+-}n=40, %|b{+-}2n=1, %|b{+-}3n=0.0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=9.3 ms, %|b{+-}n=9.5, %|b{+-}2n=1.5, %|b{+-}3n=0.2 (2016Ma12). 
T$half-life of the {+64}Ti activity has not been measured. It is expected to be greater than the time-of-flight of 620-650 ns (considered by the evaluators to be about the same as in 2009Ta24, which was communicated to one of the evaluators in e-mail reply of Sept 23, 2009 from O. Tarasov). From systematics of half-lives of neighboring Ti isotopes, the half-life is expected to be <10 ms (15 ms for {+61}Ti, 22.4 ms for {+60}Ti and 27.5 ms for {+59}Ti), assuming a decreasing trend of half-lives as neutron number increases in neutron-rich nuclei. 2021Ko07 give 5 ms from some other systematics. 
$Measured production cross section=0.0085 pb {I+98-65} using {+9}Be target and 139 MeV/nucleon {+82}Se beam (from e-mail reply of May 22, 2013 from O. Tarasov, first author of 2013Ta14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T$upper limit estimated from the experimental collection rates of adjoining nuclides (1992Bo37) 
J$2- from syst (2012Au07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from 2007Do17. 
J$7/2- proposed from syst (2012Au07) 
$ Shell-model calculations by 2010Pe15 predict magnetic dipole moment |m=+5.106 {I49} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$earlier measured value was >800 ms by 1992Bo37 
$No delayed protons were detected. Thus {+43}V decays almost 100% by |b{++}+|e decay to {+43}Ti (2007Do17). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$E{-p}(c.m.)=759 {I26} to 475 {I10} level in {+43}Ti (2020Fu05). See also comment in header section for a possible 2853 level as the T=2 IAS 0+ in {+44}V, tentatively proposed by 2020Fu05 from the same proton peak at E{-p}(c.m.)=759 {I26} keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$E{-p}(c.m.)=910 {I11} to 475 {I10} level in {+43}Ti (2020Fu05), with E{-p}(c.m.) from weighted average of 917 {I53} (2014Po05), 908 {I11} (2007Do17), and 950 {I50} (1992Bo37). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
E$E{-p}(c.m.)=1384 {I12} to 475 {I10} level in {+43}Ti (2020Fu05), with E{-p}(c.m.) from weighted average of 1371 {I62} (2014Po05) and 1384 {I12} (2007Do17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$E{-p}(c.m.)=1739 {I15} to 313 {I1} level in {+43}Ti (2020Fu05), with E{-p}(c.m.) from weighted average of 1719 {I44} (2014Po05) and 1741 {I15} (2007Do17). This assignment is considered as uncertain by 2020Fu05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$superallowed |b transition (log| {Ift}=3.47 {I8}) to 6606, 2+ state in {+44}Ti 
T$from 1997Ha04, average of values from decay curves for five different |g rays. Other: 90 ms {I25} (1971Ce02) 
%ECA$reported by 1971Ce02 
$Measured mass excess=-23800.4 {I71} (2022Wa39), -23804.9 keV {I80} (2020Pu02), -23827 keV {I20} (2018Zh29). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6)+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$weighted average of 266 keV {I10} (2022Wa39, measured mass excess of -23800.4 {I71} for {+44}V g.s. and -23534.3 {I73} for {+44}V isomer); 268 keV {I10} (2020Pu02, measured mass excess of -23804.9 {I80} for {+44}V g.s. and -23537.0 {I55} for {+44}V isomer); 286 {I28} (2018Zh29, measured mass excess of -23827 {I20} for {+44}V g.s. and -23541 {I19} for {+44}V isomer). Note that 2022Wa39 and 2018Zh29 are from the same laboratory in Lanzhou, but different techniques were used, thus the evaluators treat the two results as independent. 
J$allowed |b transition (log| {Ift}=4.11) to 4015, 6+ level in {+44}Ti; shell-model prediction (1997Ha04). J=5,7 not completely ruled out 
T$from 1997Ha04, average of values from decay curves for five different |g rays. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x=266.2, deduced by 2011Ta33 from calculated mirror-energy difference (MED) of -5 keV between {+44}V and {+44}Sc. Energy of 6+ isomer in {+44}Sc is 271.2 keV in {+44}Sc Adopted Levels. A value of 271 {I9} is given in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
E,J$mirror state of 234.7, 2-, but branching ratios of the E1 and M1 transitions are different by a factor of at least 10 in the two nuclides 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J from log| {Ift}=3.6 to 7/2- 
MOMM1 2001Bu02 predict |m=3.63 {I4} or 3.83 {I4} based on linear correlations between g.s. gyromagnetic ratios and superallowed |b-decay transition strengths of mirror nuclei and shell model calculations 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
Peak at |?390 in {+50}Cr(p,{+6}He) spectra not discussed by 1975Mu09 (E=46 MeV, |q=10.6|'. Mag spect; pc, scin) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E from E(p)(c.m.)=2.10 MeV {I5} to {+44}Ti 1082.99 {I9} state in {+45}Cr |b{++}p decay and S(p)({+45}V)=1617 {I17}. Other: 4803 {I28} from Coulomb energy prediction for the mass of the {+45}V analog state 
J,ISPIN identified as the T{-z}=+1/2 member of J|p=7/2-, T{-1/2}=3/2 quadruplet ({+45}Sc g.s. parent); see {+45}Cr |b{++} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E from E(p)(c.m.)=2.10 MeV {I5} to {+44}Ti 1082.99 {I9} state (1974Ja10) and S(p)({+45}V)=1617 {I17}. Other: 4803 {I28} from Coulomb energy prediction for the mass of the {+45}V analog state 
J,ISPIN from syst of J=7/2-, T=3/2 f7/2 quadruplets 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 2011Ho02 using |g(t). Adopted value of 465 ns {i22} is given in 2011Ho02 based on averaging current value with the literature value taken from ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$from log| {Ift}=3.484, 0+ T=1 analog state 
T$from decay of |b{++} measured in scintillation detectors, all references; weighted average of 422.57 ms {I13} (1997Ko65), 422.28 ms {I23} (1977Ba01) and 422.47 ms {I39} (1977Al11). Others: 423.4 ms {I20} (1974Ha59), 425.3 ms {I20} (1973Al02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$from E(level), T{-1/2}, and |g(|q) one gets J=3. 
g=+0.546 {I10} from analysis of perturbed |g(|q) (1982Si15). 
T$weighted average of 1.04 ms {I10} (1967Co12) and 1.0 ms {I1} (1962Mo19) from decay of 801|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ measured by 2012Pa07. The uncertainty is dominated by statistics. The authors state that the contribution from {+42}Sc is substantially smaller even with generous limits applied, and estimate uncertainty from this to be 0.02 ms. The value of 422.66 ms {I6} is compared to previous measurements of 422.47 ms {I39} (1977Al11), 422.28 ms {I23} (1977Ba01) and 422.57 ms {I13} (1997Ko65). The authors quote weighted average of all four values as 422.62 ms {I5}. 
$ From the averaged half-life of 422.62 ms {I5}, and new Q value measurement in 2011Er02, 2012Pa07 deduce corrected Ft value=3074.1 s {I26} which is consistent with average Ft=3072.08 {I79} from 13 well-known superallowed (0+ to 0+) transitions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J 3/2 from AB (1978Re03). |p=- from L(p)=1 in ({+3}He,d) 
T from 1973Fi02 (|g's. 10 min intervals). Others: see 1995Bu05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$other: 1.7 ps {I14} from RDM in {+24}Mg({+32}S,2|ap|g), 0.7 ps {I+12-3} from DSAM in (p,n|g) and >208 fs from DSAM in (p,|g) E=0.4-1.8 MeV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J from |g(|q) in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) and stretched E2 |g to 7/2- 
T$weighted average of |t=2.0 ps {I+10-8} from RDM in ({+40}Ca,n2p|g) and |t=2.5 ps {I8} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV. Other: >0.31 ps from DSAM in (p,|g) E=0.4-1.8 MeV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 3/2 from comparison of ({+3}He,d) S(+)(L=1) for {+47}V and other V isotopes states (1989Bo18) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J|)J-2 E2 |g to 11/2- 
T$weighted average of |t(2615)=0.99 ps {I10} and 0.97 ps {I10} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV. Other: <1.4 ps from comparison of DSA(1320|g) with that for the 1149|g from 1295-keV state in ({+10}B,n2p|g). >1.7 ps from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J|)J-2 E2 |g to 15/2- 
T$weighted average |t=0.60 ps {I6} and 0.57 ps {I6} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV and |t=0.70 ps {I11} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J|)J-2 (E2) |g to 15/2+ 
T$0.23 ps {I4} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV discrepant. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$19/2 or 23/2- from J|)J or J|)J-2 E2 |g to 19/2-. Ne 19/2 from membership in band. 
T$weighted average of |t=0.50 ps {I7} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV and |t=0.35 ps {I3} and 0.37 ps {I5} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV. T{-1/2}=0.254 ps {I18} is the arithmetic mean of |t=0.372 ps {I24} (NRM) and 0.360 ps {I26} (RT); |t=0.373 ps {I34} (LWM) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$15/2- to 23/2- from D,E2 |g to 19/2-. 21/2- from membership in band 
T$other: 0.24 ps {I3} from {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV if 1362|g-1904|g sequence is reversed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J|)J-1 |g to (23/2-) and D,E2 |g to 21/2-. 
J$21/2 OR 25/2- FROM J|)J-1 G TO 5903 AND ^D,E2 G TO 21/2-. 
T$other: 0.05 ps {I3} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV if 1362|g-1904|g sequence is reversed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$D,E2 |g to (19/2+). Membership in band 
T$other: <0.07 ps from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of |t=0.14 ps {I3} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV and |t=0.16 ps {I2} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J|)J-2 E2 |g to (23/2+) 
T$weighted average of |t=0.12 ps {I5} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV and |t=0.20 ps {I8} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J|)J-2 E2 |g to (27/2-). 
J$27/2- OR 31/2- FROM J|)J-2 E2 G TO 7883 AND M1 G FROM 10769. 
T$weighted average of |t=0.34 ps {I4} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV and |t=0.37 ps {I3} from DSAM or NGTB in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=110, 115 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$J|)J-1 |g to (72/2-) and D,E2 |g to (25/2-). 
J$25/2 OR 29/2- FROM J|)J-1 G TO 7883 AND ^D,E2 G TO 7399 
T$other: <0.10 ps from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,2|ap|g) E=125 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
J from J|)J or J|)J-2 |g cascade to 9/2- and membership in band (1994Ca04). |p=- from M1 |g from 15/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2-)
level_comment:
J stretched D |g's from (27/2-) and to (23/2-) and membership in band. Parentheses added by evaluator 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J |<5/2+ from 875,986 res primary RUL's (1986De13). |=3/2 from 1549 res primary |g(|q); |p=- from almost 100% decay to g.s. (1973Sc29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2,3/2,5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from 986 res primary RUL 
3370.52,3370.56 doublet identified by differing |g-deexcitation patterns 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 5/2 from decay |g(|q) and decay RUL's (1986De13). |p=- since |d|=0 for 1565 res primary (1973Sc29) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J from 1253 res primary |g(|q) and RUL and from decay RUL's. Parentheses added by evaluator since this state is a possible doublet 
Possible doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 1/2,(3/2-,5/2-) from 743,875,1154 res primary RUL's (1986De13). 1/2 from average-spin method (1991Ki11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
From 1973Sc29. J|p=(3/2-) suggested by 1973Sc29 not adopted by evaluator due to possible problems with the data. See 1986De13 for discussion 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
Weakness of transition indicates a small admixture of ((|p 1f{-7/2}){+2}(|p 2p{-3/2})) in expected (|p 1f{-7/2}){+3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J if J|p=1/2-, a spectroscopic factor would be obtained which alone would exceed the total 2p1/2 strength by 15% 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
J 3/2 from comparison of S(+)(L=1) for {+47}V and other V isotopes states (1989Bo18) discrepant with adopted J|p=1/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J since the 149 state takes most if not all of the T=1/2, 1f7/2 strength, the 2546 and 2723 states most probably are 1f5/2 (1967Ro13); however, see the comment on the 2.55-MeV state in ({+16}O,{+15}N) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J see comment on 2546 state 
L 1967Do03 obtain L=2; however L=3 would also agree with their data but not as well as L=2 (evaluator) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J since spectroscopic strength of this plus the 4300 state would be 70% greater than the IAS sum-rule limit of 0.17 if J=7/2 (1967Ro13) 
L,S see comment on 4195 state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
IAS({+47}Ti,161) (1971Ok06,1967Ro13,1967Do03) 
L,S see comment on 4195 state 
COULOMB DISPLACEMENT ENERGY=7.84 MEV 2 (1967Ro13), 7.835 MEV (1967Do03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2
level_comment:
$C{+2}S'=4.3 
Only this state was populated with appreciable strength in the work of 1973Ko01. 
L from 1973Ko01 
S 1973Ko01 deduced N=2.0-3.1 from N=d|s/d|W(exp,max)/(N({+3}He,d)C{+2}S({+15}N g.s.)(d|s/d|W(max,RDRC))) assuming n({+3}He,d)=2.0 and C{+2}s({+15}n g.s.)=2.0. 1973Ma01 found that their data agreed with ({+3}He,d) best if N=3.75. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |=3/2 from |g(|q)(879|g). J{-i}=7/2, J{-f}=5/2 uniquely from |g(|q)(478|g). |p=+ from D,E2 |g to 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
J J=1/2 to 11/2 from 1149|g to 5/2-,7/2-. J{-i}=11/2,9/2 and J{-f}=7/2 from |g(|q)(1149|g), with the 9/2 assignment being less likely 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J deexciting gammas observed in n|g tof rule out L=4; J=7/2, 9/2 from |g(|q)(1087|g) since J=11/2 implies L=3+4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E from 1971Be29 
IAS({+47}Ti,g.s.) (T=3/2,J=5/2-). 
L from 1967Ro09 
COULOMB DISPLACEMENT ENERGY=7867 KEV 4 (1971Be29), 7846 KEV 1 IF 7835 KEV 5 FOR 46TI-46V (1967Ro09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J$ from Adopted levels of {+47}V in ENSDF database 
S$ from |b-decay measurements 
$Counts=1218 {I49} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Counts=17309 {I185} from total Counts of IAS and 2863 {I821} from estimated counts corresponding to the Gamow-Teller transition strength in the IAS 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from atomic beam (1978Re03,1966Re06); parity from L({+3}He,t)=4 from 0+ 
T$weighted average of 15.976 d {I3} (1974Ts01) and 15.971 d {I4} (1972Em01). Others: 16.15 d {I17} (1957Va08); 16.23 d {I3} (1975Al23) and 15.94 d {I1} (1966Va26) are discrepant and considered as outliers. 
MOMM1$from radiative detection of nuclear magnetic resonance ({+51}V standard) (1980Bu11). See also 2019StZV compilation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) (1973SaZF); L({+3}He,t)=L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 
T$weighted average of 7.09 ns {I7} (1967Au02), 7.21 ns {I21} (1971Bo13), and 7.07 ns {I14} (1969PaZT) from {+48}Cr |e decay, 7.12 ns {I4} (1973SaZF) and 7.21 ns {I28} (1963Ba22) from (p,n|g), 
MOMM1$from differential perturbed angular correlations ({+51}V standard). Other: +0.28 {I10} from integral perturbed angular correlations of gamma following nuclear reactions with {+51}V standard (1978Ta17); 1.63 {I10} from |g-radiation anisotropy in nuclear orientation (1966Ca04). See also 2019StZV compilation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=1 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); L(d,|a)=L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; strong |e feeding (log {Ift}=4.3) from 0+ parent 
T$from |g|g|g(t) in ({+14}N,2n4p|g) (2005Ma81). Others: <1 ns from |g|g(t) in (p,n|g) (1973SaYL) and DSAM in ({+24}Mg,n3p|g) (2002Br42) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=5 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) (1973SaZF) and ({+10}B,2p|g) (1973Hu08); parity from |g(|q,pol) in (p,n|g) (1976Ri01) 
T$weighted average of 8.3 ps {I25} from ({+16}O,pn|g) (1974Ha66) and 6.1 ps {I10} from in (|a,n|g) (1975Br07), using RDM. Other: <14 ps from RDM in ({+10}B,2p|g) (1973Hu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$spin=1 from |g(|q) in ({+10}B,2p|g) and (p,n|g); 537.2|g E2(+M3) from 3-. Other: L({+3}He,d)=3 from 5/2- gives |p=+ for a group at 520 {I15} 
T$from |g(t) in (p,n|g) (1973SaZF). Other: 0.7 ns<T{-1/2}<6.9 ns from RDM in ({+10}B,2p|g) (1973Hu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,pn|g) and (p,n|g); 613.4|g M1+E2 to 4+ 
T$from RDM in (|a,n|g) (1975Br07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=6 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) (1973SaZF); 627.3|g E2 to 4+ 
T$weighted average of 77 ps {I7} from |g|g|g(t) in ({+27}Al,3n3p|g), 73 ps {I7} from RDM in ({+16}O,pn|g), and 76.9 ps {I62} from RDM in (|a,n|g). Other: 90 ps {I42} from RDM in ({+40}Ca,2p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,pn|g) and (p,n|g); 310.8|g M1(+E2) from 3- 
T$from RDM in ({+16}O,pn|g). Other: 2.8 ps<T{-1/2}<29 ps from RDM in ({+40}Ca,2p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q,pol) and |g(|q) in (p,n|g); L({+3}He,t)=3 from 0+. Other: L({+3}He,d)=3 from 5/2- gives |p=+ for a group at 1064 {I15} 
T$weighted average of 4.4 ps {I18} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 4.6 ps {I13} from (|a,n|g), using RDM 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) (1973SaZF) and |g(|q,pol) (1976Mo26) in (p,n|g) 
T$from RDM in (|a,n|g). Other: 4.2 ps {I10} from RDM in ({+16}O,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=7 from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,pn|g) (1974Ta15); L(d,|a)=6 from 0+ 
T$others: <3.5 ps from RDM in ({+16}O,pn|g), <6.9 ps from RDM in ({+10}B,2p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) and ({+16}O,pn|g); 812.4|g E2 to 2- 
T$others: <2.8 ps from RDM in (|a,n|g), <6.9 ps from RDM in ({+16}O,pn|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=5 from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,pn|g); member of K|p=4- rotational band 
T$others: |<3.0 ps from RDM in (|a,n|g), <3.5 ps from RDM in ({+16}O,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+,6+,7+
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). Others: 1736 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 1743 {I10} from (d,|a) could be a doublet 
J$L({+3}He,t)=6 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1767 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) and 1760 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L(3He,D)=1 for 1779 doublet. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$other: 2178 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2- and L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+. See comments for E(Level) of the 2196 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)-
level_comment:
E$In ({+3}He,t), 1975Ma13 give L=3 from 0+ for a group at E=2187 {I10} and 2016Ga23 give a contradicting L=0 for a group at E=2186 {I10}, which could indicate a doublet, also considering that the 2196 level from (p,|g) with 1143|g to 3- and 2196|g to 4+ is consistent with L({+3}He,t)=3 but not 0 while a level at E=2178 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) with L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2- (1968Do06) is consistent with L({+3}He,t)=0 but not 3. Also note that there is a 2179.5 level from (p,n|g). Therefore, the evaluator has assigned L({+3}He,d)=1 (1968Do06) and L({+3}He,t)=0 (2016Ga23) to the same level around 2180 and L({+3}He,t)=0 (1975Ma13) to the 2196. 
J$L({+3}He,t)=3 from 0+; 2196.0|g to 4+, possible 1143.0|g to 3-. See E(level) comments above. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+,4+
level_comment:
E$others: 2247 {I15} from ({+3}He,d), 2258 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 2270 {I10} from (d,|a). 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$others: 2289 {I6} from (p,n|g), 2292 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 2287 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), and 2305 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1771.2|g D, |DJ=0 to 6+ and 712.4|g D, |DJ=1 to J=5 give spin=6; M2 for 1299.3|g to 4- ruled out by RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$others: 2409 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 2408 {I5} from ({+3}He,p|g), 2411 {I15} from ({+3}He,d), 2415 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 5/2- for a group at 2455 {I15}, L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ for a group at 2464 {I15} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)-
level_comment:
E$others: 2473 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 2471 {I10} from (d,|a), 2471 {I3} from (p,|g) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=3 from 0+; 1955|g to 1-, 2159|g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3,4+)
level_comment:
J$2300|g to 2+, possible 1986.0|g to 4+; L({+3}He,t)=2 from 0+ for a group at 2610 {I10}. See comments for 2607.4 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,t)=2 from 1975Ma13 for a group at 2610 {I10} and 0 from 2016Ga23 for a group at 2611 {I10} indicate a doublet, with the former (L=2) probably corresponding to the 2604.7 level and the latter (L=0) corresponding to the 2607.4 level in (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=9 from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,pn|g); 1371.7|g E2(+M3) to 7+ 
T$other: <1.2 ps from DSAM in ({+16}O,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-,5-,6-
level_comment:
E$others: 2694 {I15} from({+3}He,p), 2715 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 2707 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=5 from 0+ for a group at 2715 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+,4+
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,t). Other: 2783 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 2786 {I15} from ({+3}He,d), 2779 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4)-
level_comment:
E$others: 2793 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 2799 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$2-,3-,4- from L({+3}He,t)=3 for a group at 2793 {I10} (1975Ma13) from 0+; 2789|g to 4+. Note that L({+3}He,t)=0 from 2016Ga23 for a group at 2792 {I10} is inconsistent, which could indicate a separate level around this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
E$others: 2828 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 2817 {I10} from ({+3}He,t), 2837 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,t)=(5) from 0+; 2055|g to 3+, 2825|g to 4+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2949 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) and 2959 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1(+3) from a group at 2937 {I15} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$others: 3018 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 3020 {I30} from (p,{+3}He). 
J$({+3}He,p)=L({+3}He,t)=L(p,{+3}He)=0 from 0+; identified as IAS of {+48}Ti ground state. 1968Do06 in ({+3}He,d) report the IAS at 3043 {I15}, which is weakly excited as mentioned by the authors, while in their earlier study in ({+3}He,p) (1968Do03), the strongly excited IAS is identified at 3018 {I15}, which is consistent with E(IAS)=3022 {I15} (1972Be38), 3021 (1975Ma13) and 3018 {I10} (2016Ga23) in ({+3}He,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 3043 {I15} from ({+3}He,d), 3043 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$1968Do06 in ({+3}He,d) report the state at 3043 {I15} as the IAS of {+48}Ti ground state, but also state that the ({+3}He,d) transition to this state is weak and non-stripping. See comments for 3022.6 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$775.5|g D, |DJ=1 to 6-; member of K|p=4- rotational band; spin=7 suggested by 775.5|g(|q) in ({+16}O,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3371 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) and 3387 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2-; L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+,4+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3440 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) and 3461 {I15} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+,4+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3523 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) and 3490 {I15} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+,4+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3801 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) and 3810 {I15} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4017 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) and 4030 {I15} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=3 from 5/2-; IAS of {+48}Ti 983, 2+ level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4698 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4678 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4798 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4773 {I10} from ({+3}He,t) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; L({+3}He,t)=0 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$values from this dataset: 7.09 ns {I7} (1967Au02), 7.21 ns {I21} (1971Bo13), 7.07 ns {I14} (1969PaZT) 
MOMM1$from g-factor=+0.222 {I8} using differential perturbed angular correlations, with {+51}V as standard (1987Ra19). Other: +0.376 {I34} (1967Au02) and 0.44 {I19} (1969PaZT) using integral perturbed angular correlation; 0.51 {I23} from a fixed angle, reversed field measurement (1969PaZT) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$spin=1 supported by |g(|q) and |g decay pattern in 1973Hu08 
T$deduced by the evaluator from 0.7 ns<T{-1/2}<6.9 ns given in 1973Hu08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$other: spin=5 from 1974Ta15 based on 2|<J|<5 from |g(|q) and J|>5 from |g excitation function is discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$1974Ta15 claim that J=J(1099)+1 from analysis of 586.5|g 
T$deduced by 1974Ha66 based on the fact that 586.4|g is obscured by a 584.4|g from {+113}Cd which has a lifetime|?9 ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=5 from |g(|q) in 1974Ta15 
T$DSAM gives |t=2.3 ps {I6} but |t<3 ps is adopted in 1974Ha66 due to uncertainties in the feeding time and the lifetime of the cascading 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=9 from |g(|q) in 1974Ta15 
T$DSAM gives |t=1.30 ps {I35}, but |t<1.7 ps adopted by 1974Ha66 due to uncertainties in the feeding time. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 424 keV {I15} (1968Do03) and 421 keV {I15} (1974Ha55). 
$d|s/d|W{-c.m.}=54 {I8} |mb/sr (1974Ha55), 67 {I8} (1973Sm12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2296 {I15} keV (1968Do03) and 2289 keV {I15} (1974Ha55). 
$d|s/d|W{-c.m.}=182 {I27} |mb/sr (1974Ha55), 163 {I30} (1973Sm12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2410 {I15} keV (1968Do03) and 2408 keV {I15} (1974Ha55). 
$d|s/d|W{-c.m.}=69 {I14} |mb/sr (1974Ha55), 87 {I15} (1973Sm12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3018 {I15} keV (1968Do03) and 3019 keV {I15} (1974Ha55). 
$IAS of {+48}Ti g.s. 
$d|s/d|W{-c.m.}=409 {I47} |mb/sr (1974Ha55), 350 {I50} (1973Sm12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3701 {I15} keV (1968Do03) and 3702 keV {I15} (1974Ha55). 
$d|s/d|W{-c.m.}=268 {I36} |mb/sr (1974Ha55), 290 {I30} (1973Sm12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in 1973SaZF 
T$from 308.3|g(t) (1973SaZF). Other: 7.21 ns {I28} from 1963Ba22. 
$g-factor: measured by 1978Ta17 from integral perturbed angular correlation using T{-1/2}=7.09 ns {I4}, taken by 1978Ta17 from weighted average of data from 1967Au02, 1963Ba22, 1971Bo13, and 1973SaZF. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$spin=1 from |g(|q) in 1973SaZF 
T$from 1973SaYL based on 112.5|g(t) following closely 98.0|g(t) and 210.4|g(t) and lower limit (1 ns) of halflife measurement in 1973SaYL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$spin=1 from |g(|q,pol) in 1976Ri01 and |g(|q) in 1973SaZF 
T$from 98.0|g(t) and 210.4|g(t) (1973SaZF) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 421 {I10} (2016Ga23), 413 {I15} (1972Be38) 
L$0 from 2016Ga23, 2 from 1975Ma13 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=3410 {I81} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 2186 {I10} (2016Ga23), 2211 {I15} (1972Be38) 
L$0 from 2016Ga23, but 3 from 1975Ma13, this could indicate a doublet 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=197 {I19} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 2288 {I10} (2016Ga23); 2278 {I15} in 1972Be38 could correspond to 2258+2287 in 1975Ma13 
L$from 2016Ga23 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=1140 {I47} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$others: 2406 {I10} (2016Ga23); 2410 {I15} in 1972Be38 could correspond to 2385+2408 in 1975Ma13 
L$0 from 2016Ga23, 2 from 1975Ma13 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=5260 {I100} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 2458 {I15} in 1972Be38 and 2465 {I10} in 2016Ga23 could correspond to 2358+2473 in 1975Ma13 
L$|>1 for a group at 2465 {I10} in 2016Ga23 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=137 {I20} for a group at E=2465 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 2611 {I10} (2016Ga23) 
L$0 from 2016Ga23 but 2 from 1975Ma13 indicate a doublet 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=333 {I25} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 2792 {I10} (2016Ga23) 
L$0 from 2016Ga23, but 3 from 1975Ma13 is inconsistent 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=356 {I28} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$IAS of {+48}Ti 0+ ground state. Others: 3018 {I10} (2016Ga23), 3022 {I15} (1972Be38) 
L$also from 2016Ga23 
$Counts(0|'-0.5|')=7260 {I117} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J J from electron paramagnetic resonance (1976Fu06, 1957We17); |p from L=3 in stripping and pickup 
T from 1983Hu03 (NaI. {+55}Fe (T{-1/2}=1007 d) standard). Others: see 1978LeZA 
MOMM1 Electron paramagnetic resonance ({+51}V standard) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 5/2-,9/2- from |DJ=1 M1 |g to 7/2-. Ne 9/2 from D |g from 3/2- 
T from |g(t) in (p,n|g). See comment on conflict with other values in this dataset 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L(p)=1 in stripping and pickup. E2 |g to 7/2- 
T from |g(t) in (p,n|g). Others: see |b{++} decay, (p,|g), and (p,n|g). 
MOMM1 TDPAD; see (p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J J from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g). |p from M1+E2 |g to 3/2+ (1975Ha12) 
T other: 0.17 ps {I+35-7} from (p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J Ne 5/2 from D+Q |g to 3/2-. J|p=(3/2-) if the {+49}Cr 6423 state is the IAS (1985Fu03); Ne 1/2 from possible D |g from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2 from p|g(|q)'s to 5/2+ and 5/2- and p|g(|q) from 5/2+ in (|a,p|g). |p=+ if suggestion by 1974Ta05 that L(t,|a)=2 is correct 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2,15/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g). |d(1241|g) for J=11/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g) not consistent with |a(exp)(1242|g). |p=- from E2 |g to 11/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 5/2-,7/2,9/2- from D,E2 |g's to 5/2- and 9/2-. 7/2- from possible D |g to 5/2+ and possible D,E2 |g to 11/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 9/2-,11/2-,13/2- from M1+E2 |g to 11/2-. 11/2- from comparison of theoretical and experimental |s(|q) in (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2,11/2- from D,E2 |g's to 7/2- and 11/2-. 9/2,11/2 from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); Ne 9/2+ from |d(9/2 to 7/2 or 9/2) and comparison to RUL. Ne 11/2- from possible D,E2 |g's to 5/2- and 7/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L(t,|a)=2; Ne 3/2+ from D,E2 |g to 7/2-. Proposed as the 7/2+ member of the K|p=1/2+ rotational band by 1975Ha12 but this is not consistent with L(t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2,9/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 7/2,9/2 from D+Q |g to 7/2- and D,Q |g to 11/2-. |=9/2- from possible D,Q,E3 |g to 3/2+. 1992Di02 assumed 7/2- in their multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
J 13/2,17/2 from |DJ=1 d |g to 15/2-. J>15/2 from excit in ({+12}C,3p|g). Member of 7/2- g.s. yrast band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
J 11/2-,13/2 from D,E2 |g to 15/2- and D,Q |g to 9/2+. Member of K|p=3/2+ rotational band 
$T{-1/2}>3.5 ps, T{-1/2}<0.7 ns 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2-)
level_comment:
J |<7/2- from D,E2 |g from 3/2- resonance. Strong |g's from (1/2-) resonances; weak |g from (7/2-) resonance 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 7/2,9/2 from D,Q |g's to 5/2- and 11/2-. (3/2,5/2,7/2-) from deexcitation of resonances assuming D,E2 for strong transitions and multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J 1/2+ to 7/2- from deexcitation of resonances assuming D,E2 for strong transitions and multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis. 7/2- from L(p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (LE 7/2)-
level_comment:
J |p=- from L(p,t). |<7/2- from deexcitation of resonances assuming D,E2 for strong transitions and multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_comment:
J 15/2,19/2 from |DJ=2 Q or |DJ=0 d |g to 15/2- and |DJ=1 d to 13/2,17/2. Member of 7/2- g.s. yrast band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2(+),3/2,5/2-
level_comment:
J |<5/2- from D,E2 |g from (1/2-) res. 1/2+,3/2,5/2 from deexcitation of resonances assuming D,E2 for strong transitions and multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2+)
level_comment:
J 3/2,5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, 5/2-, and 5/2+ assuming D,E2; 3/2,5/2+ from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-),5/2
level_comment:
J 3/2,5/2 from |g's to 5/2-, 3/2-, 3/2+, and 5/2+. Ne 3/2+ from possible |g to 7/2-. (1/2) from isotropic primary |g's in (p,|g) (1972Ki06) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-)
level_comment:
J J from |g(|q)'s in (p,|g); |p=- based on greater probability for p-wave penetration and |d Ne 0 to 91 and 153 states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, and 7/2- assuming D,E2; 3/2,5/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J 5/2- from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, and 9/2- assuming D,E2; 5/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2-)
level_comment:
J 5/2-,7/2- from |g's to 3/2- and 9/2- assuming D,E2; 5/2,7/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
J (5/2) from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2(+), 7/2-, and 7/2+ assuming D,E2; 5/2,7/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
J 5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, 7/2-, and 7/2+ assuming D,E2; 3/2,5/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J 5/2,7/2- from |g's to 3/2-, 7/2-, and 7/2+ assuming D,E2; 7/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
J,ISPIN from agreement in expected energy for IAS({+49}Ti 2504, 1/2+) and simple seniority estimates in (p,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
J 1/2-,3/2,5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, and 5/2- assuming D,E2; 1/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2- from |g's to 3/2- and 7/2- assuming are D,E2; 7/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J,ISPIN 3/2,5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, 5/2-, and 5/2+ assuming D,E2; 3/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis. J|p=3/2+, T=5/2 from agreement in expected energy for IAS({+49}Ti 2664, (3/2)+) and simple seniority estimates in (p,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, and 7/2- assuming D,E2; 3/2-,5/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
J 5/2 from |g's to 3/2-, 3/2+, 7/2-, and 7/2+ assuming D,E2; 5/2,7/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2- from |g's to 3/2- and 7/2- assuming D,E2; 1/2,3/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2+ from |g's to 3/2+ and 7/2- assuming D,E2; 5/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2+)
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2+ from |g's to 3/2+ and 7/2- assuming D,E2; 5/2,7/2 from multidimensional nonmetric scaling analysis 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
J 13/2,17/2 from |DJ=1 D |g to 15/2- (1991Ca23). J>15/2 from excit (1978Fo09). Member of yrast band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2-)
level_comment:
J 15/2,19/2 from |DJ=2) Q or |DJ=0 D |g to 15/2- and |DJ=1 D to 13/2,17/2 (1991Ca23). Member of yrast band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2,5/2 from p|g(|q)(394|g). |=3/2 from p|g(|q)(1050|g). |p=+ from M1+E2 |g to 3/2+ 
T disagrees with 0.17 ps {I+35-7} from (p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J |=1/2,7/2 from p|g(|q). |p=- from M1+E2 |g to 3/2-. 5/2- from excitation strength in (p,n) 
T disagrees with <0.01 ps (1974Ta05) but agrees with 31 fs {I21} from (p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2,7/2+ from |g-deexcitation pattern. |=3/2,5/2 from |d(3/2,5/2)=0.53 {I31}, 0.7 {I+8-3} of |g to 7/2-, |d(5/2)=0.83 {I40} of |g to 5/2+, and |d(7/2) of |g to 3/2+ from p|g(|q) and comparison to RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 1/2,3/2(-),5/2 from p|g(|q) and comparison to RUL. |p=+ could not be definitely excluded 
T disagrees with <0.02 ps (1974Ta05) but is consistent with 38 fs {I21} from (p,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1/2,3/2(+),5/2+ from p|g(|q) and RUL(898|g). J|p=1/2+ if state corresponds to L=0, 1652 in (t,|a) 
T from 1981Oh08. Consistent with 5.2 ps<T{-1/2}<0.7 ns (1975Ha12) but not with 2.2 ps {I+8-5} (1974Ta05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |=1/2 from p|g(|q). 3/2,5/2 from p|g(|q)(855|g,1840|g). |=5/2 from p|g(|q)(394|g). |p=(+) from suggestion by 1974Ta05 that L(p)=2 in (t,|a) is correct 
T from 1981Oh08. Others: 0.13 ps {I5} (1974Ta05), 0.9 ps {I+6-3} (1975Ha12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 11/2,15/2 from p|g(|q); excit favors 15/2 (1973Sa12) 
T consistent with <2.4 ps (1974Br04) but not with >2.66 ps (1974Ta05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J 1/2-,3/2-,5/2- from p|g(|q) and M1+E2 |g to 3/2-. 1975Ha12 suggest 3/2- on the basis of L(p)=1 for 2279 state in ({+3}He,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2,9/2,11/2+ from D,E2 to 9/2+, 7/2+, and 9/2-. 11/2+ favored by band structure. 1975Ha12 suggest |=7/2+ from |g to 11/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2,11/2- from D,E2 |g's to 7/2- and 11/2-. 9/2,11/2 from p|g(|q). |=9/2+ from |d(9/2 to 7/2 or 9/2) and comparison to RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2,9/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2,11/2- from D,E2 |g's to 7/2- and 11/2-. 9/2+ from L(p)=4, 3137 state in ({+3}He,d) is not rigorously rejected by |d(9/2 to 7/2) and comparison to RUL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2,11/2,13/2)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 9/2-,11/2-,13/2- from pG(|q) and M1+E2 G to 9/2-,11/2-,13/2-. It is not clear if 1975Ha12 considered and rejected J=7/2 (evaluator) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$3.5 ps<T{-1/2}<0.7 ns 
J 9/2,11/2,13/2+ from decay modes and T{-1/2}. 13/2+ favored if member of K|p=3/2+ rotational band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 1969Le15 and 1972Ki06 suggest 5/2(-) on the basis L(p)=(3) in (t,|a) and primary |g(|q) 
T disagrees with 1.3 ps {I+6-4} from (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J from observation that state is weakly populated in (t,|a) (1968Ba02). Note: J|p(2183)=7/2- in adopted 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
2812 and 2821 states in (t,|a) and ({+3}He,d) coincided but are assumed to be different states based on |s(|q) (1968Ba02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$C{+2}S'=5.4,3.6 
S first value from 1976Ma51; see 1976Ma51 for values with other potentials. Second value from 1978Sh22. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$since the ordering of the 1730-3096 |g cascade is ambiguous, the position of the intermediate level is uncertain 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=0.92 ps {I14} (2020Mu08). This value is compared with |t=0.93 ps {I+55-28} in 1975Ha02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$measured mean lifetime |t=0.41 ps {I6} (2020Mu08). This value is compared with |t=0.35 ps {I+15-11} in 1975Ha02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$spin from hyperfine structure in paramagnetic resonance (1952Ba63,1953Ki41); parity from L({+3}He,d)=L(d,t)=3; also L(d,|a)=L(p,{+3}He)=6 from 0+ 
T$from T{-1/2}(|e)=2.67|*10{+17} y {I+16-18} (68% confidence interval) and T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>1.9|*10{+19} y (90% confidence interval) in 2019La09. Others: T{-1/2}(|e)=2.29 |*10{+17} y {I25} from 123 net counts for the 1588 keV |g transition of the {+50}Ti daughter nuclide taking into account detection efficiency and natural abundance of {+50}V and T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>1.7|*10{+18} y (2011Do08); T{-1/2}(|e)=1.71|*10{+17} y {I26} and T(|b{+-})=8.2|*10{+17} y {I+131-31} (1989Si07, this value was an average of 2.05|*10{+17} y {i49} measured by 1989Si07, their previous value of 1.2|*10{+17} y {I+8-4} in 1985Si02, and 1.5|*10{+17} y {i3} by 1984Al10). T{-1/2}(|b{+-}) was measured by 1989Si07 as 8.2|*10{+17} y {I+131-31}, based on analysis of intensity of 783|g (from 783,2+ level in {+50}Cr), in a complex |g spectrum, contributed by several activities near 772-790 keV range, whereas 1984Al10 measured T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>4.3|*10{+17} y from non-observation of 783|g in {+50}Cr. Total half-life implied from the |e and |b{+-} partial half-lives in 1989Si07 was 1.42|*10{+17} y {I23}, in disagreement with >2.0|*10{+17} y from 2011Do08. Theoretical nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) and partial half-lives calculated by 2014Ha33 using shell model. 
$T{-1/2}(|e)=1.51|*10{+16} y and T{-1/2}(|b{+-})=9.04|*10{+17} y predicted from theory by 1979Ni02. 
MOMM1$NMR (1981Lu04) using {+2}H and {+1}H standards. Others: 1954Wa37, 1953Ki41, 1952Ba63. 
$Note: 1981Ha26 reference in 2014StZZ for |m and Q is incorrect, it should be 1981Lu04 
MOME2$value from 1982Bl03 (NMR; deduced from measured Q({+50}V)/(Q({+51}V); also 1981Bl14); sign from 1979Er04 (atomic-beam laser double resonance detection). Evaluated by 2008Py02 and 2016St14. Others: 0.21 {i4} (1981Lu04,NMR) using {+51}V standard; 1981Ta12 (NMR technique); 1979Sk06 (NMR method, deduced quadrupole interaction, and Knight shift). No polarization correction included. 
%EC+%B+$from >98.6%, deduced from T{-1/2}(|e+|b{++})=2.67|*10{+17} y {I+16-18} (68% confidence interval) and T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>1.9|*10{+19} y (90% confidence interval) in 2019La09. Others: |e>92.9 measured by 2011Do08 from observation of no |b{+-} activity through the non- observation of 783|g in {+50}Cr; %|e=83 {I11} from 1989Si07 is in disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$M1(+E2) 226.3g to 6+; L(p,{+3}He)=L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ 
$B(E2) from Coulomb excitation 
T$other: <11 ps from DSAM in (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g(|q) in (|a,np|g); L(p,{+3}He)=4 from 0+. 
T$from B(E2)|^=0.0031 {i5} in Coulomb excitation and Adopted |g branching ratio. Other: <320 ps (DSAM in (p,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(d,|a)=2 from 0+; L(p,{+3}He)=2+4 from 0+; 35.1|g to 4+ can only have mult=D; 129|g to 5+ 
T$from DSAM in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$M1 516.1|g to 4+ and 836|g to 6+; L({+3}He,d)=1+3 from 7/2-; L(p,{+3}He)=L(d,|a)=4 from 0+ 
T$weighted average of 76 fs {i28} in (p,n|g) and 33 fs {i10} in (|a,p|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 909.7|g to 6+; L(p,{+3}He)=L(d,|a)=6 from 0+; M1+E2 814.6|g from (8)+ 
T$other: 0.08 ps {I+8-4} from DSAM in (|a,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 683.9|g to 5+; spin=4 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 
T$weighted average of 76 fs {i9} in (p,n|g) and 60 fs {i12} in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 912.8|g to 2+; spin=2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); L(p,{+3}He)=2 from 0+ 
T$weighted average of 52 fs {i11} in (p,n|g) and 43 fs {i8} in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=L(p,{+3}He)=0+2 from 0+; spin=1 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 
T$from DSAM in (p,n|g). Other: <10 fs from DSAM in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; spin=3 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); 1013.4|g M1(+E2) to 2+; 1081.6|g and 493|g to 4+ |g(|q) and polarization measurements in (p,n|g) and |g to a level with J|p=1+,2+,3+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=L(d,|a)=0+2 from 0+; spin=1 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); 1106.7|g M1+E2 to 2+ 
T$weighted average of 51 fs {i7} in (p,n|g) and 38 fs {i8} in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,p)=L(d,|a)=2 from 0+; spin=2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 1129.9|g to 2+ 
T$weighted average of 190 fs {i35} in (p,n|g) (1974Ri13) and 139 fs {i14} in (|a,p|g). Other: 58 fs {I16} from DSA of 1130|g and 69 fs {I14} from DSA of 1163|g in 1974Ri02 from (p,n|g) are in disagreement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); 1173.2|g M1(+E2) to 2+. But L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2- gives 3+,4+ 
T$others: from DSAM in (p,n|g): >0.38 ps (1974Ri13), 3.7 ps {I33} from DSA of 1172|g and 0.16 ps {I12} from DSA of 1206|g (1974Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 1724.5|g to 6+; |g excitation in (|a,np|g) 
T$other: 0.37 ps +42-14 from DSAM in (|a,pn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1934 {I8} from ({+3}He,d), 1936 {I5} from (p,n), 1937 {I7} from (p,p') and 1935 {I6} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=L(p,d)=L(d,t)=3 from 7/2-; L(d,|a)=(4,0) from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 1953 {I5} from (p,n), 1957 {I7} from (p,p') and 1956 {I4} from (d,|a) 
J$L(p,{+3}He)=0+2 from 0+. Also L(d,t)=L(p,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=3. L({+3}He,d)=0 giving 3-,4- is inconsistent, but level in this reaction is uncertain 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2037 {I8} from ({+3}He,p), 2038 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2037 {I5} from (p,n), 2038 {I7} from (p,p') and 2038 {I4} from (d,|a) 
J$L(p,{+3}He)=4 from 0+; also L(d,|a)=(4) from 0+. But 3-,4- from L({+3}He,d)=0 is inconsistent. Note that level in ({+3}He,d) is not seen in one of the ({+3}He,d) studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2103 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2109 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2112 {I6} from (p,p'), 2112 {I6} from (d,d'), and 2112 {I4} from (d,|a). 
J$L(p,{+3}He)=4 from 0+; L(d,t)=3+1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2131 {I8} from ({+3}He,p), 2132 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2133 {I7} from (p,p'). Other: 2130 {I20} (p,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+; L({+3}He,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2168 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2157 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2162 {I6} from (p,p'), and 2162 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=L({+3}He,d)=0 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2350 {I8} from ({+3}He,p), 2342 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2344 {I7} from (p,p'), 2341 {I6} from (d,d'), 2340 {I20} from (p,d), and 2345 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+; also L(d,t)=1(+3) from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2394 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2399 {I8} from (p,p'), and 2400 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=1+(3) from 7/2-. 3-,4- from L({+3}He,|a)=0 is inconsistent, but there is some uncertainty about level in ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2427 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) and 2424 {I4} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=L({+3}He,d)=0 from 7/2-; also L(p,{+3}He)=L(d,|a)=3. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2453 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2454 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2456 {I7} from (p,p'), and 2455 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,|a)=4 from 0+; also L({+3}He,d)=1 and L(d,t)=3 from 7/2-. 3-,4- from L({+3}He,|a)=0 is inconsistent, but L({+3}He,|a)=3 is also suggested in one of the ({+3}He,|a) studies 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2478 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2481 {I6} from (p,p'), 2481 {I6} from (d,d'), and 2489 {I8} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(d,t)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2513 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2512 {I6} from (p,p'), and 2510 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2532 {I10} from ({+3}He,p) and 2534 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=0 from 7/2-; also L(d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=2 from 7/2- and L(d,|a)=3,5 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2595 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2600 {I7} from (p,p'), and 2596 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=L{+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2657 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2655 {I9} from (p,p'), and 2647 {I8} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=1 and L(d,t)=3+1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,4,5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2735 {I12} from ({+3}He,p), 2738 {I8} from (p,p'), and 2735 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,|a)=4,(6) from 0+; also L(d,t)=3 from 7/2-. But L({+3}He,|a)=2 from 7/2- is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5,6,7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2763 {I6} from (p,p') and 2760 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,|a)=6,(4) from 0+; also L(d,t)=3 from 7/2-. But L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2- is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2782 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2792 {I7} from (p,p'), and 2792 {I5} from (d,|a) 
J$L(p,{+3}He)=L(d,|a)=2 from 0+; also L(d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2816 {I8} from ({+3}He,p), 2815 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2815 {I10} from (p,p'), and 2818 {I8} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+; also L(d,|a)=2; L({+3}He,d)=1; L(d,t)=(3+1) 
$1481 and 1509 |gs placed from 2816 state in ({+3}He,p|g), but 1493 and 1499 |gs from 1725 and 1811 states, respectively, in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5+,6+,7+)
level_comment:
E$from E|g. 2850 {I8} from weighted average of 2849 {I8} from (p,p') and 2850 {I8} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,|a)=(6) from 0+; also L(d,t)=(3) from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2876 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), and 2878 {I8} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=0 and L(d,t)=0+2 from 7/2-; also L(d,|a)=3 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2922 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2935 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2931 {I8} from (p,p'), and 2923 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=3; also L({+3}He,d)=3 for a possible level in that reaction. 3-,4- from L({+3}He,|a)=0 is inconsistent but level population is not certain. (2-) from L(p,{+3}He)=(1+3); (3 to 7)(+) from L(d,|a)=(4,6) are also inconsistent, but all these L values are tentative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1:6)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2958 {I9} from (p,p') and 2955 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=2 from 7/2-. L(d,|a)=(4) from 0+ is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2967 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) and 2965 {I9} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 and L(d,|a)=(4) from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 2989 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 2995 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 2992 {I9} from (p,p'), and 2990 {I6} from (d,|a) 
J$L(p,{+3}He)=0+2 and L(d,|a)=L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; also L({+3}He,d)=1 and L(d,t)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3:7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3022 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 3011 {I8} from (p,p'), and 3014 {I10} from (d,|a) 
J$L(d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2-and L(d,|a)=(4,6) from 0+. But L(p,{+3}He)=(2,3) gives (1+,2,3,4-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3090 {I10} from ({+3}He,p), 3101 {I15} from ({+3}He,d), and 3099 {I8} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2-; also L(p,d)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3140 {I8} from ({+3}He,p), 3142 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), 3142 {I8} from (p,p'), and 3136 {I6} from (d,|a) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2+4 and L(d,|a)=2 from 0+; also L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3171 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 3169 {I8} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+. But L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2- is inconsistent. Note that this level is seen only in one of the ({+3}He,|a) studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3202 {I8} from (p,p'), 3210 {I20} from (p,d), and 3200 {I8} from (d,|a) 
J$L(p,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2-. L(d,|a)=(2) from 0+ is inconsistent. Possible 1690|g to 2+ disfavors 4- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$from weighted average of 3216 {I8} from ({+3}He,p) and 3220 {I6} from (d,|a). Other: 3230 {I10} from E|g 
J$L({+3}He,p)=L(p,{+3}He)=0+2. However, J|p=0+ is suggested from possible assignment of this level as IAS to 11680, 0+ in {+50}Cr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3262 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) and 3274 {I8} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,p)=4 from 0+; also L({+3}He,d)=1 and L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+,5+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3292 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 3285 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), and 3297 {I7} from (p,p') 
J$L(p,{+3}He)=4 from 0+; also L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3429 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) and 3433 {I8} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$3479 {I8} from weighted average of 3466 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 3482 {I8} from (p,p'), and 3480 {I20} from (p,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=L(p,{+3}He)=0+2. However, J|p=0+ is suggested from possible assignment of this level as IAS to 11680, 0+ in {+50}Cr 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0,1)+
level_comment:
E$3565 {I9} from weighted average of 3562 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 3566 {I9} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0(+2) from 0+. But L({+3}He,|a)=2 from 7/2- is inconsistent. There may be two separate levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:7)
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,d) 
J$1 to 6, |p=- from L({+3}He,d)=2; 0 to 7, |p=+ from L({+3}He,|a)=3. There may be two separate levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3658 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 3658 {I10} from ({+3}He,d), and 3671 {I5} from (p,p') 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3701 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) and 3700 {I5} 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 and L({+3}He,|a) from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3717 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) and 3722 {I5} from (p,p') 
J$ L(p,{+3}He)=0+2 from 0+; also L({+3}He,d)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+,3-,4-)
level_comment:
E$from (p,p'). 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2- gives 3-,4-, but L(p,{+3}He)=0+2 from 0+ gives 1+. Possible two levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3792 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 3798 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; L(p,{+3}He)=4 from 0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3858 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 3840 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1:4)
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 3943 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 3938 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$1+,2+,3+ from L({+3}He,p)=2; 3-,4- from L({+3}He,d)=0. Possible two levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4067 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4075 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2-; also L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0:7)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4130 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4116 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4148 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4145 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+
level_comment:
E$4266 {I10} from weighted average of 4252 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4272 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; L({+3}He,|a)=1 from 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1:6)-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4507 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4498 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=2 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-,4-
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4569 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4570 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=0 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2,3)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4602 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4597 {I10} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=1 from 7/2-; L({+3}He,p)=(2) from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1:6)
level_comment:
E$from ({+3}He,d) 
J$2 to 5, |p=+ from L({+3}He,d)=1; 1 to 6, |p=- from L({+3}He,|a)=2. Possible two levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4816 {I15} from ({+3}He,p), 4800 {I20} from (p,d), and 4806 {I6} from (p,{+3}He) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0 from 0+; L(p,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=3 from 7/2-; IAS of {+50}Ti g.s., 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4909 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4898 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 4943 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 4928 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5062 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5058 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2:5)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5123 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5090 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5554 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5531 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5750 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5755 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=0+2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+,2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5778 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5786 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+,3+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 5945 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 5951 {I15} from ({+3}He,d) 
J$L({+3}He,p)=2 from 0+; L({+3}He,d)=1 from 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
E$weighted average of 6395 {I15} from ({+3}He,p) and 6380 {I20} from (p,d) 
J$L(p,d)=3; possible IAS of 1555, 2+ in {+50}Ti favors 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$2+ from |g(|q,pol) in 1974Ri13 
T$weighted average of 190 fs {I25} from DSA of 1130|g and 239 fs {I62} from DSA of 1163|g in 1974Ri13. Other: 58 fs {I16} from DSA of 1130|g and 69 fs {I14} from DSA of 1163|g in 1974Ri02 are in disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$2+ from |g(|q,pol) in 1974Ri13 
T$other: 3.7 ps {I33} from DSA of 1172|g and 0.16 ps {I12} from DSA of 1206|g (1974Ri02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$370 {I20} for an unresolved broad peak in 1978Oh01 and 340 for a broad peak in 1964Le10 could correspond to the 320+355+385 in 1965Ba29 
L$other: L=3 for a peak at 340 (1964Le10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$920 {I20} for an unresolved broad peak in 1978Oh01 and 870 for a broad peak in 1964Le10 could correspond to the 835+905 in 1965Ba29 
L$other: L=3 for a peak at 870 (1964Le10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1330 {I20} from 1978Oh01 and 1350 from 1964Le10 could correspond to the 1290+1320 in 1965Ba29 
L$other: L=3 for a peak at 1350 (1964Le10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1973Sm02, 2333 from 1975Ma06 deviate from other studies. 
$d|s/d|W=0.437 mb/sr for 2333 group in 1975Ma06 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0+)
level_comment:
E$from measured Q value and Q(g.s.) (1978Ko27). 
$T=(3). J,T: IAS({+50}Ti g.s.). |s(p,t)/|s(p,{+3}He)=1.1 {i3}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=63.2 
E$other: 228 {I12} (1964Bj01) 
L$other: 4+6 from 1973Ba33, with spectroscopic factor S=7.42 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=26.6 
E$other: 357 {I12} (1964Bj01) 
L$other: 2+4 from 1973Ba33, with spectroscopic factor S=4.73 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=41.9 
E$other: 836 {I12} (1964Bj01) 
L$other: 4+6 from 1973Ba33, with spectroscopic factor S=4.47 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=206.2 
E$other: 909 {I12} (1964Bj01) 
L$other: 6 from 1973Ba33, with spectroscopic factor S=15.0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from T{-1/2}(|e)=2.67|*10{+17} y {I+16-18} (68% confidence interval) and T{-1/2}(|b{+-})>1.9|*10{+19} y (90% confidence interval) (2019La09), for decay to the first excited state in {+50}Ti and the first excited state in {+50}Cr, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$for |e decay to the 2+, 1553.8-keV level in {+50}Ti (2020Da12). Other: >8.9 |* 10{+18} y for |b decay to the 2+, 783.3-keV level in {+50}Cr. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J$J=7/2 from paramagnetic resonance (1976Fu06); L=3 in {+50}Ti({+3}He,d) and {+52}Cr(d,{+3}He). 
$|m=+5.14870573 {I18} ({+2}H standard, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), 1981Ha26, 2014StZZ) 
$Q: from Laser Resonance Fluorescence Spectroscopy (LRFS) (1989Un01). Others: -0.052 {I10} ( Atomic Beam Magnetic Resonance (AB), 1967Ch09,1967Ch10), -0.033 {I10} (Proton Pick-up Reaction: Spectroscopic Factors (PPR), 1973Cl10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E1 |g from 1/2+ 2547 to 928, M1+E2 |g from 928 to 320, and M1+E2 |g from 320 to 7/2- g.s. uniquely establish J|p(320)=5/2-, J|p(928)=3/2-. 
T$from |g(t) in (p,p'|g). Others: 180 ps {10} (|b|g(t), 1976BeXW), 190 ps {I30} (|b|g(t), 1970Si21) and 177 ps {42} (|b|g(t), 1962We06) in {+51}Ti |b{+-} decay; 190 ps {I40} in Coul.Ex., 180 ps {I20} in (|g,|g). 
BE2$From weighted average of 0.0135 {I14} (1971DaZM), 0.0092 {I30} (1970Hu12), 0.0092 {I19} (1967Af03), 0.013 {I2} (1962Ri09), 0.0130 {I26} (1960Go08), 0.012 {I3} (1960Ad01). 
$|m: from Integral Perturbed Angular Distribution after Coulomb Excitation (CEAD) (1968Ke09). Others: +4.0 {I7} (1963Kr02), +4.4 {I8} (1974VaYR). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$see 320 level 
BE2$From weighted average of 0.0044 {I5} (1971DaZM), 0.0032 {I6} (1970Hu12), 0.0043 {I3} (1970Ho16), 0.0031 {I6} (1967Af03), 0.0043 {I9} (1960Go08). 
T$from adopted B(E2) and branching (0.860 {I10}). Others: >3 ps (1980Va08); <10 ps (1976Wh01) in (d,n|g); |< 31 ps (|b|g(t), 1976BeXW) and 70 ps {I25} (|b|g(t), 1970Si21) in {+51}Ti |b{+-} decay; 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 7/2- g.s., L=1 for 6+ target in (d,p). 
BE2$From weighted average of 0.010 {I2} (1967Af03), 0.013 {I3} (1968An20), 0.012 {I6} (1968Ke09), 0.0136 {I8} (1972WaYZ), 0.0116 {I20} (1970Hu12), 0.0141 {I14} (1970Ho16), and 0.0150 {I15} (1971DaZM). 
T$from weighted av of 0.35 ps {I8} in (p,p'|g), 0.49 ps {I7} from Doppler-broadened lineshape analysis in Coul. ex., 0.59 ps {I4} from adopted B(E2) and 0.44 ps {I8} in (|a,p|g). Others: 0.14 ps {I1} in (|g,|g'), 0.49 ps {I+42-14} in (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 7/2- g.s., E2 |g to 5/2- 320. 
BE2$From weighted average of 0.0031 {I7} (1970Hu12) and 0.0046 {I10} (1970Ho16). 
T$weighted av of 0.48 ps {I10} in {+48}Ti(|a,p|g), 0.64 ps {I19} in {+51}V(p,p'|g), 0.71 ps {I+14-11} from adopted B(E2), 0.48 ps {I10} in (|a,n|g), 0.62 ps {I+55-21} in (n,n'|g). Others: 0.28 ps in (n,n'|g), 0.07 ps {I1} in (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L=2 and J dependence of |s(|q) in {+52}Cr(d,{+3}He) and {+50}Ti({+3}He,d). 
T$from weghted av. of 0.62 ps {I14} in {+48}Ti(|a,p|g) and 0.36 ps {I+31-13} in {+51}V(p,p'|g) (taking the midpoint of region of overlap). Other: 0.6 ps +6-3 in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$J=15/2 from |g(|q) to 11/2- in (HI,xn|g), L=4 in {+51}V(p,p') 
T$from RDM in (HI,xn|g). Other: >0.7 ps in {+51}V(p,p'|g), |>0.8 ps in (|a,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|s(E|g,|q) and compound-nucleus calculations in {+51}V(n,n'|g), L=3 in {+50}Ti({+3}He,d). 
T$others: <2.0 fs in {+51}V(p,p'|g), 8 fs {I4} in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|p=- based on M1+E2 8372|g from 5/2- 11587.9; J=5/2 from comparison with Hauser-Feshbach prediction and decay properties in {+51}V(p,p'|g). 
T$other: 15 fs {I3} in {+51}V(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$comparison with Hauser-Feshbach predictions and decay properties in {+51}V(p,p'|g). 
T$from (p,p'|g). Other: 159 fs {I+77-55} in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g to 7/2- g.s., J=3/2-,5/2- from comparison with Hauser-Feshbach predictions and decay properties in {+51}V(p,p'|g). 
T$from (p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2,11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 11/2- and 7/2- gives 7/2-,9/2,11/2-, Hauser-Feshbach calculation suggests 9/2 or 11/2 
T$from weighted av. of 67 {I14} in (p,p'|g) and 29 {I21} in {+51}V(n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from (p,p'|g). Other: <104 fs in (n,n'|g) 
J$|g's to 9/2- and 11/2-, J=13/2- from comparison with Hauser-Feshbach calculation and decay properties in {+51}V(p,p'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$E2 |g to 5/2-, L=1 in {+50}V(d,p) 
T$From weighted av. of 10 {I3} in (n,n'|g) and 4.9 {I14} in (|g,|g'). other: <2.0 fs in {+51}V(p,p'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L=1 in {+50}V(d,p), |g to 5/2- g.s. 
T$other: 28 fs {I12} from (p,p'|g), 18 fs {I6} from (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g to 7/2- g.s., |s(E|g,|q) and I|g measurements and compound nucleus calculation in {+51}V(n,n'|g). 
T$other: 45 fs {I+28-14} in (p,p'|g), 17 fs {I3} in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$|g from 5/2- 11592 in {+50}Ti(p,|g). 4843.4 {I3} in (|g,|g') 
J$M1+E2 |g from 5/2-, |g(|q) in {+50}Ti(p,|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2,11/2)-
level_comment:
E$From {+51}V(|g,|g') 
J$L=1+3 in {+50}V(d,p). J=9/2-,11/2- proposed by 1999Ka65 in (|g,|g') 
J$L=1+3 in {+50}V(d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
G From |g(|q,H,t) for adopted T{-1/2}=184 ps {I6}. The authors obtained g=1.69 {I29} for T{-1/2}=173 ps {I14}. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E authors' value of 3126 (1980Ka40) in column 1 of their table is a misprint. The E|g value give E(level)=3213. 
J from 1970PoZZ. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
BE2 From weighted average of 0.0135 {I14} (1971DaZM), 0.013 {I2} (1962Ri09), 0.0130 {I26} (1960Go08), 0.012 {I3} (1960Ad01). Other: 0.0092 {I19} (1967Af03). 
g factor=+1.54 {I13} (1968Ke09) 
|m=+3.3 {I3} (1968Ke09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2 From weighted average of 0.0044 {I5} (1971DaZM), 0.0043 {I3} (1970Ho16), 0.0031 {I6} (1967Af03), 0.0043 {I9} (1960Go08). 
T from adopted B(E2) and branching (0.860 {I10}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2 From weighted average of 0.010 {I2} (1967Af03), 0.013 {I3} (1968An20), 0.012 {I6} (1968Ke09), 0.0136 {I8} (1972WaYZ), 0.0141 {I14} (1970Ho16), and 0.0150 {I15} (1971DaZM). 
T from B(E2)=0.0136 {I8} one gets 0.58 ps {I3}. Weighted average of 0.35 ps {I8} in (p,p'|g), 0.49 ps {I7} from Doppler-broadened lineshape analysis in Coul. ex., 0.566 ps {I25} from B(E2) in Coul. ex., and 0.68 ps {I12} from B(E2) in (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T from 1989Ab05. Others: 1953Sa11, 1954Ko07, 1963Ma41, 1965Bo42, 1965Ko09, 1968Re04, 1969Wy01. 
J L(d,p)=1 from 7/2-, L({+3}He,p)=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)MAX=21 
L data can be fit by either L=3 or L=4 dominated 2+4. Exclusion of L=3, and hence assignment of J|p=3+, are based on consideration of (d,p) results. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E authors suggest population mainly of 23-keV state, since L=4 and DWBA calculation for population of g.s. and 17 level, if configuration is (|p f7/2)(|n p3/2), gives |?20% of |s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_comment:
J |s(DWBA) and |s(|q) give best agreement for configuration (|p f7/2)(|n g9/2) coupled to J=8 with L=7. |s(|a,d)/|s({+3}He,p) suggests large spin. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$resolution was insufficient to separate from nearby 3773 peak. 
S$from doublet with L=1+4 to account for neighboring 3773 peak. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$resolution was insufficient to separate from nearby 3960 peak. 
S$from doublet with L=1+4 to account for neighboring 3960 peak. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T $weighted average of 1.557 min {I22} (1997Sm10), 1.60 min {I10} (1971Do02), 1.60 min {I5} (1969Wa12), and 1.520 min {I15} (1966Ra27). Other: 1.7 min (1956Sc54). 
J L(t,p)=0. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from ({+11}B,2p4n|g). Other: >1.4 ps (t,p|g). 
J |g to 7/2- is stretched E2 ({+11}B,2p4n|g), L(t,p)=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J strong |g's to 7/2-, (3/2)- with comparable I|g and the two gammas assumed to be dipole transitions. |p from L(t,p)=2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=4.83 via (3/2)- parent, |g's to 7/2- and 3/2- with comparable I|g and both gammas assumed to be dipole transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J |b branches to 4+ levels are allowed, J|p=3+, 4+, or 5+; log| {Ift}=7.0 to 2+ rules out J|p=4+,5+. 
T from weighted average of T{-1/2} from six transitions in {+54}V |b-decay (1977Na17). Other: 43 s {I3} (1970Wa14). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from shell-model calculations (2011De20) 
T$from 1977Na17 (authors' average of 6.47 s {I11} from 518|g-decay curve, and 6.79 s {I21} from 881|g-decay curve) 
$1977AlZZ superseded by 1977Na17. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$(1/2-:7/2-) from |gs to (5/2-) and (3/2-), but apparent |b feeding from (1/2-) parent state favors 1/2-,3/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=0.297 s, %|b{+-}n=0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=6.6 s, %|b{+-}n=0 (2021Mi17). 
T$from 2003Ma02 (fragment-|b and fragment-|b-|g correlated decay curves). Others: 0.24 s {I4} (1998Am04, implants-|b correlated decay curves); 230 ms {I25} (1998So03, singles-|b and |b|g-coin decay curves) are in agreement with value from 2003Ma02, but much less precise. 
J$log| {Ift}=4.62 to 0+ ground state of {+56}Cr 
$Proposed configuration=|p3/2[321]~#|n3/2[312] (1998So03), with 1+ assignment for the g.s. of {+56}V 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-N$0.44 (calculated,1997Mo25) 
J$shell-model calculations with GXPF1 interaction and full {Ipf} space predict 7/2- g.s., first 5/2- at 95 keV, and first 3/2- at 530 keV. Potential energy surface HFB calculations using Gogny DIS force (1999So20) predict 7/2 as the lowest state for slight oblate deformation and 3/2- for small prolate deformation. 3/2- with |p3/2[521] configuration is predicted (1998So03) in QRPA calculations and comparisons with observed decay pattern. 7/2- is preferred from systematics of neighboring odd-A Vanadium and even-even Ti nuclides, and recent (2008LuZZ) observation of an (11/2-) to (7/2-) |g transition in {+238}U({+64}Ni,x|g) reaction. But 5/2,3/2 is favored if |b feeding is real in {+57}V decay to (3/2)- g.s. in {+57}Cr. Other: 3/2- from calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$ from timing of |b|g coin (1998So03). Others: 0.34 s {i8} (1998Am04,1997AmZZ, earlier values from the same group: 0.66 s {i4} (1995AmZY), 0.6 s {i1} (1995AmZX)). See 1998Am04 and 1998So03 for a comparison of their measurements of T{-1/2} with theoretical estimates using different models. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
E$ the 205-ms activity is assumed to belong to the g.s. of {+58}V. 
J$ |b feeding of <38 {I7} to g.s. of {+58}Cr in {+58}V decay suggests 1+ or 0+, the former being more likely from possible configuration= |n1f{-5/2}~#|p1f{-7/2}. However, from shell model calculations, 2005Ga01 predict 2+ for g.s. and 1+ as first excited state; strong 114|g may define a 1+ level in {+58}V at this energy, in which case the ground state of {+58}V may be 2+. Although, the decay scheme of {+58}V is not well established, 2+ seems unlikely in view of some evidence of |b feeding of g.s. of {+58}Cr. See also discussions in 2003Ma02 (also 2004Li12) for discussion in favor of 1+ for g.s. of {+56}V and {+58}V 
T$ weighted average of 185 ms {I10} (2003Ma02), 205 ms {I20} (1998So03), 0.20 s {I2} (1998Am04) 
$Calculated delayed-neutron decay mode: %|b{+-}n=0.8 (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J For moderate deformations, a (|p f{-7/2}) g.s. configuration is expected, and the 23rd proton should occupy the 3/2[321] and the 5/2[303] orbitals, respectively, for prolate and oblate deformations. QRPA calculations predict a prolate g.s. 120 keV below an oblate configuration (1999So20), so it is unclear which of these orbitals is in fact the g.s. and {+59}V may exhibit shape coexistence. 2005Li53 list tentative 5/2- referring to 1999So20. 
%B-N$2005Li53 estimated (|J3%) from its decay to 2+ state in {+58}Cr observing 880|g and 1056|g in the delayed |g-ray spectrum. 
T$From 102|g(t) and 208|g(t) in 2005Li53 - good statistics - decay curve fitted with an exponential function with linear background; consistent with a half-life of 95 ms {I3}, determined from {+59}Cr growth and decay with half-life of 1.05 s {I9} (1050 ms {I90}) of {+59}Cr in {+59}V |b{+-} decay. Other values: 75 ms {I7} (1999So20), 130 ms {I20} (1998Am04), and 70 ms {I40} (1998So03). Value from 2005Li53 is adopted over that in 1999So20, based on better statistics (~33 times) and precision. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$From 1999So20. Others: 200 ms {I40} (1998Am04), 220 ms {I30} (1995AmZX) 
J$3+ from syst (2012Au07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$adopted from fit to {+60}Ti decay component (2003So02). Direct measurement of {+60}V decay gives T{-1/2}=68 ms {I5} which 2003So02 consider for a composite of two isomers. 
J$(1+) suggested by 1999DaZQ on the basis of possible configuration=((|p f{-7/2}){+3}(|n f{-5/2}){+-1}) and comparison with {+58}Mn which has configuration= ((|p f{-7/2}){+-3}(|n f{-5/2}){+1}) and J|p=1+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$From 2010Da06. Other: 0.229 {I+25-23} (2012Ka36) 
J$(4+) suggested by 2010Da06, 1999DaZQ based on proposed mult 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$J|p=(3+), from systematics (2012Au07) 
T$From 1999So20, also 2001So07 and 1999Le67. Others: 200 ms {I40} (1998Am04), 220 ms {I30} (1995AmZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$J|p=(1+), from systematics (2012Au07) 
T$From 2003So02. 68 ms {I5} (2003So02,2005Ga01), indirect value from fitting to decay curve of {+60}Ti. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=294 ns {I6} from 99.1|g(t) and 292 ns {I9} for 103.2|g(t), giving weighted averaged |t=293 ns {I6} (compiler). Others: T{-1/2}=229 ns {I+25-23} in 2012Ka36 (Phys. Rev. C 86, 054319), and 320 ns {I90} in 2010Da06 (Phys. Rev. C 81, 034304; originally from Fig. 4.13 in 1999DaZQ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$%|b{+-}n>10 (2014Su07) from observation and absolute intensity of 644-keV transition in {+60}Cr. Other %|b{+-}n|>6 (2003So02). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=27.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=12.7, %|b{+-}2n=0.0 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=63.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.5, %|b{+-}2n=0.1 (2016Ma12) 
J$possible configuration=|p3/2[321] of f{-7/2} orbital (2005Ga01), assuming small quadrupole deformation. 2014Su07 assign 3/2- or 5/2-, former is more likely if ground state is prolate deformed, the latter is possible if oblate deformation; further 5/2- is less likely due to lack of observation of population of 4+ level in {+60}Cr by |b{+-}n decay mode of {+61}V. A 7/2- spherical configuration was predicted in shell-model calculations (1995Ri05), and 5/2- in theoretical calculations by 1997Mo25 
T$weighted average of 49 ms {I1} (2014Su07, |b(fragment) correlations, decay curve, including daughter and grand-daughter decays, fitted with exponential and constant background); 52.6 ms {I42} (2011Da08,2002MaZN, |b(fragment) correlations, decay curve, including daughter and grand- daughter decays, fitted with exponential and constant background); and 47.0 ms {I12} (2003So02, timing of |b and {+61}V correlated events, also 47 ms {I1} in 2005Ga01; 41 ms 1 quoted in table 3 of 2005Ga01 is a misprint). Other: 43 ms {I7} (1999So20, older value from the same experimental group as 2003So02, although a different reaction was used to produce the {+61}V activity) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$Proposed by 2020On01 as |p5/2[303] state 
T$Measured by 2020On01. This value can be compared with 48.3 ms {I10} in {+61}V Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (March 2019 update) 
%B-N$determined from number of neutron detected in coincidence with |b and implantation of a {+61}V beam particle. Note: Pn=15 {I+3-2} in Table I of 2020On01 is a misprint, as communicated by W.-J. Ong in an e-mail reply of Jan 6, 2021. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ from time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events in the DSSSD. Fitting procedure included five parameters: |b-detection efficiency, background rate, mother, daughter and granddaughter half-lives (2011Da08). Others from the same group: 33.5 ms {I20} (2003So02), 33.6 ms {I23} (2002MaZN), 65 ms {I31} (1999So20) 
J$ 3+ proposed by 2011AuZY (NUBASE) from systematics. 1997Mo25 predict 5/2- proton and 1/2- neutron valence orbitals which is consistent with 3+ from 2011AuZY 
$ Measured production cross section=21 nb in {+9}Be({+238}U,F), E=750 MeV/nucleon (1997Be70) 
$Calculated (1997Mo25) %|b{+-}n=22, |b{+-}2n=0.5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$from systematic of neighboring odd-A V isotopes (2014Su07,2021Ko07); Other: 2021Ju04 propose 3/2- from shell-model calculations. 
T$weighted average of 20 ms {I1} (2014Su07), 19.2 ms {I24} (2011Da08,2002MaZN), and 17 ms {I3} (2003So02). Other: >150 ns (1995CzZZ). 
$%|b{+-}n: estimated by 2014Su07 based on measured intensity of 2+ to 0+ transition in {+62}Cr. Others: >35 (2003So02), >41 {I16} (2002MaZN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0,1,2)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode has been observed, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference 
$In the study of {+64}V decay to {+64}Cr, 2014Su11 did not observe any |g ray which could be assigned to {+63}Mn, |b{+-}n daughter of {+64}V, from which %|b{+-}n could be assigned |?0. However, there could be |b{+-}n decay of {+64}V to the ground state of {+63}Mn. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=9.0 ms, %|b{+-}n=29, %|b{+-}2n=2, %|b{+-}3n=0.0 (2019Mo01). 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=18.6 ms, %|b{+-}n=12, %|b{+-}2n=1.7, %|b{+-}3n=0.1 (2016Ma12). 
E$the observed activity is assumed to correspond to the g.s. 
J$proposed by 2014Su11 based on non-observation of |b feeding of (4+) state in {+64}Cr. Other: 2- or 7- from |W{-p}=5/2- and |W{-n}=9/2+ (2019Mo01, theory) 
T$weighted average of 15 ms {I2} (2014Su11) and 19 ms {I8} (2011Da08). 2014Su11: |b decay curve fitted with known half-lives of {+64}Cr and {+64}Mn and a constant background. Contribution from |b{+-}n decay mode was not included due to the absence of any |g rays from |b-delayed neutron emission of {+64}V. 2011Da08 (also 2002MaZN): from time correlation between implantation and |b-ray events in the DSSSD; the fitting procedure included five parameters: |b-detection efficiency, background rate, mother, daughter and granddaughter half-lives 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$assuming that 81-keV transition feeds the ground state. There seems no experimental verification of this assumption in 2014Su11, thus the level energy of the isomer is treated as tentative by the evaluator 
T$from 82|g(t) in 2021Wi05. Other: <1 |ms from delayed |g rays measured 300 ns after implantation of {+64}V ions (2014Su11), thus T{-1/2} may be greater than 100 ns or so 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (0,1,2)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$No |g rays observed which could be assigned to |b-delayed neutron decay mode 
J$proposed by 2014Su11 based on non-observation of |b feeding of a known 4+ state in {+64}Cr 
T$from 2014Su11, |b decay curve fitted with known half-lives of {+64}Cr and {+64}Mn and a constant background. Contribution from |b{+-}n decay mode was not included due to absence of any |g rays from |b-delayed neutron emission of {+64}V 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from 2014Su11, delayed |g rays measured 300 ns after implantation of {+64}V ions, thus T{-1/2} may be greater than 100 ns or so 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Measured cross section=2.0|*10{+-10} mb {I3} (read by the evaluators from figure 2 of 2009Ta05). 
E$ fragment observed by 2009Ta05 is assumed to be in the ground state of {+65}V. 
J$ 5/2- (syst,2003Au02), 3/2- (predicted,1997Mo25) 
T$ lower limit estimated from time-of-flight of |?360 ns as in 2005St29 (from the same lab as 2009Ta05). Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by systematics value of 10 ms (2003Au02) and calculated value of 9 ms (1997Mo25) 
$Calculated (1997Mo25) populations of daughter nuclides: 59% for {+65}Cr, 39% for {+64}Cr through |b{+-}n decay and 1.4% for {+63}Cr through |b{+-}2n decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Measured cross section=8|*10{+-12} mb {I+4-6} (read by the evaluator from figure 2 of 2009Ta05, which shows cross-sections as a function of Q(g) (the difference in mass excess of the beam particle and the observed fragment)). 
E$ fragment observed by 2009Ta05 is assumed to be in the ground state of {+66}V. 
J$ 3/2- proton and 3/2+ neutron orbital (predicted,1997Mo25) 
T$ lower limit estimated from time-of-flight of |?360 ns as in 2005St29 (from the same lab as 2009Ta05). Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by calculated value of 8 ms (1997Mo25) 
$Calculated (1997Mo25) populations of daughter nuclides: 46% for 66Cr, 16% for 65Cr through |b{+-}n decay and 38% for {+64}Cr through |b{+-}2n decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$ Theoretical values: %|b{+-}n=63, %|b{+-}2n=3.5 (1997Mo25) 
$ 3/2- from theoretical prediction (1997Mo25) 
$ Measured production cross section=0.0096 pb {I+77-72} using {+9}Be target (e-mail reply of May 22, 2013 from O. Tarasov, first author of 2013Ta14). 
T$ time-of-flight=620-650 ns (considered by the evaluator to be about the same as in 2009Ta24, which was communicated to the evaluator in e-mail reply of Sept 23, 2009 from O. Tarasov). Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical value of 5.3 ms (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$ measured by time correlation of implantation events due to {+42}Cr and subsequent emission of protons and |g rays (2007Do17). Previous result from the same group: 13.4 ms {+36-24} (2001Gi01) 
$ Total proton branching ratio is from time spectrum of events with energy >900 keV in the charged-particle spectrum. Possible small contributions from delayed-|a and delayed-2p decays were ignored. 
$ No evidence was found for 2p decay (2001Gi01) where a 1.9 MeV peak in the charged-particle spectrum was ascribed to delayed proton decay 
$ {+42}Cr decays by |b{++}+|e to {+42}V whose g.s. is unbound towards proton emission, thus each |b decay is followed by a proton decay to {+41}Ti 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Other: %|e+%|b{++}=12 {I4}, %|ep=81 {I4}, %|e2P=7.1 {I4}, %|e3p=0.08 {I3} (2011Po01) 
$%|b{++}|a=? 
$%|b{++}p=23 {I6} and %|b{++}2p=6 {I5} from 1992Bo37. %|b{++}p+%|b{++} 2p=12 {I4} to the IAS (1992Bo37). Search for |b delayed |a decay proved inconclusive (1992Bo37). Theory: 1991De26 
$Total delayed-proton emission of 88% {I4} from 2011Po01 compares well with another recent measurement of 92.5% {I28} by 2007Do17 
$Relative branching ratios of delayed protons: 91.8% {I3} for one-proton, 8.1% {I3} for two-proton and 0.096% {I30} for three-proton emissions (2011Po01). 
$Relative branching ratios of delayed protons: 87.1% {I25} for one-proton, 12.7% {I10} for two-proton and 0.14% {I+19-9} for three-proton emissions (2012Au08). Absolute branches were deduced using total delayed proton emission branch of 91.0% {I23} from 2007Do17 and 2011Po01 
$Measured E(p)=4363 keV {I9} (2007Do17) assigned to |b{++}2p mode. From simulations studies and in comparison with the experimental results, 2012Au08 show that the two protons do not share equally the delayed-2p decay energy and are emitted sequentially. A ratio of 34%-66% between the two protons is in good agreement with experimental data. In addition, an isotropic distribution of the relative angle angle between the two protons is a signature of sequential emission which is supported by measured angular correlation between two protons emitted by the decay of {+43}Cr (2012Au08) 
J$proposed by 2001Gi01 from the |b{++} decay to the (3/2+) IAS state in {+43}V. 
T$weighted average of 20.6 ms {I9} (2011Po01, decay time distribution of |b-delayed one-proton events), 21.1 ms {I4} (2007Do17, decay time distribution), 21.6 ms {I7} (2001Gi01, decay time distribution), 21 ms {I+4-3} (1992Bo37, decay time distribution) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J,T$from Adopted Levels 
$From two-proton emission from {+45}Fe, total decay energy=1.21 MeV {I5} (2012Au08), in agreement with previous measurement of 1.151 MeV {I15} (2008Bl03). The protons share equally the decay energy, and are emitted simultaneously (2012Au08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from decay-time distribution in 2007Do17. Others: 25 ms {I+6-4} (2014Po05, 2012Po03), 53 ms {I+4-3} (1992Bo37). Weighted average of the three values is 43 ms {I5}, with a large reduced |h{+2}=10.4; unweighted average is 40 ms {I8}. 2016Fu02 (also 2013Fu08) report T{-1/2}=40 ms {I5}, estimated from measured B(>) values in the {+44}Ca({+3}He,t){+44}Sc reaction with the assumption of isospin symmetry. 
$%|ep from unweighted average of 10 {I1} (2014Po05) and 14.9 {I9} (2007Do17). Other: >7 {I3} (1996Fa09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J,ISPIN from syst of J|p=7/2-, T=3/2 f7/2 quadruplets. Other: J|p=7/2- (2003Au02. Syst). 
T from 2007Do17. Other: 50 ms {I6} (1974Ja10. From proton counting (300-ms irradiation period; 30-ms open shutter period; seven 60-ms time intervals; eighth 60-ms "background" after closure of the shutter) 
%B+P From 2007Do17. Other: >|?27 (1974Ja10. If log| {Ift}=3.3 to 4797 state in {+45}V) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$ measured by 2011Ho02 by |g(t) 
J$ assignment based on comparison of lifetimes and associated transition strengths with states in mirror nucleus {+45}Sc. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 1972Zi02, timing of |b decays. Other: 0.24 s {I14} (2005On03) from |b(993|g) coin decay curve 
$ 2003OnZY and 2004OnZZ reports are superseded by 2005On03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
E$ from 2007Do17, see detailed comment in {+46}Mn |e decay 
J$ T=2 quadruplet in {+46}Sc (g.s.,4+), {+46}Ti (9168,4+,probable IAS of {+46}Sc g.s.), {+46}Cr (9152 state) and {+46}Mn (g.s.). Superallowed type |b{++} decay (log {Ift}|?3.4) from {+46}Mn g.s. to the 9152 level of {+46}Cr is consistent with this interpretation. Also mirror analogy with 9168, 4+ state of {+46}Ti 
$ This state decays mainly by proton emission, but only 17.3% {I12} branch is so far accounted in measurements of 2007Do17 and 1992Bo37. Energetically, two-proton and |a-decay modes are also possible but these are expected to be small (2007Do17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
E$ from 2007Do17. From mass excess=-31879.6 {I170} for {+45}V g.s., observed E(p) branches from this level, and excitation energies of {+45}V states, 2007Do17 obtain mass excess=-20322 {I14} for IAS in {+46}Cr, which gives excitation energy of 9152 {I24} using mass excess=-29474 {I20} for {+46}Cr. Other: 9240 {I60} (1992Bo37) 
$ Three proton branches from decay of this state have been identified (2007Do17,1992Bo37) with c.m. energies (absolute intensities): 3002 {I12} (7.0 {I7}), 3494 {I25} (3.5 {I6}), 4262 {I26} (6.8 {I8}). Other proton groups are expected from this state since the predicted |b{++} feeding of this state is |?27%. Energetically, two-proton and |a-decay modes are also possible but these are expected to be small (2007Do17) 
$ Measured proton energies (absolute intensities) are: 3003 13 (6.5 9) 3494 25 (3.5 6) and 4254 15 (5.5 9) in 2007Do17; 3000 50 (7.5 10), 3560 50 (6 1) and 4350 50 (8.5 10) in 1992Bo37 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J 1/2, 5/2 from stretched D |g to 3/2-. (5/2,7/2,9/2) from D |g from (7/2-); deexcitation patterns and similarity with the mirror nucleus {+47}V. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J |<7/2- from D,E2 |g to 3/2-. 7/2- from the comparison of the |g-ray spectrum and level scheme in {+24}Mg({+28}Si,|an|g) with the corresponding spectrum and level scheme for {+47}V; similarity of |s(|q) to the ({+3}He,{+6}He) |s(|q) to 2.79-MeV, 7/2-, state in {+39}Ca. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$(3/2,7/2) from stretched D |g from 1/2,5/2. {I3}/2+ from deexcitation patterns and similarity with the mirror nucleus {+47}V; similarity of |s(|q) to the ({+3}He,{+6}He) |s(|q) to g.s., 3/2+, state in {+39}Ca. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J 1/2,5/2 from stretched D |g to 3/2-. 5/2+ from deexcitation patterns and similarity with the mirror nucleus {+47}V. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
J from analogy to 1661, 1/2+, state in {+47}V (|DE(Coul)=8397 {I13}) and similarity of |s(|q) to the ({+3}He,{+6}He) |s(|q) to 2.47-MeV, 1/2+, state in {+39}Ca. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J from analogy to 146, 7/2-, state in {+47}V (|DE(Coul)=8262 {I10}) and similarity of |s(|q) to the ({+3}He,{+6}He) |s(|q) to 2.79-MeV, 7/2-, state in {+39}Ca. 
MASS EXCESS=-34.371 MEV 13 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J from analogy to 259, 3/2+, state in {+47}V (|DE(Coul)=8442 {I13}) and similarity of |s(|q) to the ({+3}He,{+6}He) |s(|q) to g.s., 3/2+, state in {+39}Ca. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$T{-z}=-1/2 
$J|p from {+47}Cr Adopted Levels in ENSDF database (Feb 2007 update) 
T$measured by 2017Ku12 from ({+47}Cr implants)|b correlated decay curve. Others: 472.0 ms {I63} in H. Hama et al., (AIP Conf. Proc. 164, 650 (1987)) or 1988HaZB or 1988HaZD; 508 ms {I10} in 1985Bu07 (Phys. Rev. C31, 1490); 452 ms {I18} in 1977Ho25 (Nucl. Phys. A288, 429); 460.0 ms {I15} in 1977Ed01 (Nucl. Instr. Methods 141, 315). Value of 500 ms {I15} is listed in {+47}Cr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database. Note that in {+47}Cr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, value from 1977Ed01 is quoted as 460 ms {I15} 
$Total number of {+47}Cr implanted ions=1.52|*10{+4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=2 from 0+; 752.15|g E2 to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 8.43 ps {I49} (2017Ar09), 7.3 ps {I8} (1979Ek03), and 6.7 ps {I18} (1973Ku10) in {+40}Ca({+10}B,pn|g), using RDM. Other: 11.6 ps {I15} from RDM in 1975Ha04 in ({+16}O,2n|g), which is re-analyzed to be 8.7 ps {I24} by 1979Ek03 after removing a restriction imposed by 1975Ha04 on normalization constants for obtaining intensity ratio in RDM. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=4 from 0+; 1106.3|g E2 to 2+ 
T$weighted average of 1.21 ps {I13} from ({+32}S,2|a|g), 1.04 ps {I35} from ({+28}Si,2|a|g), and 1.3 ps {I4} from ({+14}N,np|g), using DSAM. Other: 1.0 ps {I+14-4} from RDM in ({+10}B,pn|g), <3.5 ps from RDM in ({+16}O,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1586.4|g E2 to 4+; spin>4 from |g excitation function in ({+10}B,pn|g) (1979Ha45); band assignment 
T$other: <0.7 ps from DSAM in ({+14}N,np|g) (1979Ek03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g excitation function and |g|g(|q) in ({+3}He,n|g) (2003Je06); 4- is proposed by 1998Br34 in ({+28}Si,2|a|g) and the authors note that |g(|q) of 1973Ku10 (assigning 6+) in ({+10}B,np|g) and 1975Ha04 (assigning 6+) and 1979Ha45 (assigning 6-) in ({+16}O,2n|g), which were interpreted as quadrupole, would also be consistent with |DJ=0 dipole character and that negative parity is strongly suggested by systematics and 4- is from shell-model prediction. 
T$weighted average of 4.1 ns {I4} from 1675|g(t) in ({+10}B,pn|g) (1979Ha45) and 2.5 ns {I7} from RDM in ({+14}N,np|g) (1979Ek03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(-)
level_comment:
T$from ({+10}B,pn|g) 
J$|<3 from |g excitation functions and |>3 from |g|g(|q) in ({+3}He,n|g) and |p=- suggested by shell-model calculations (2003Je06). L(p,t)=3 from 0+ for an unresolved doublet at 4067 {I5} (1972Sh27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=5 from |g excitation function and |g|g(|q) in ({+3}He,n|g) (2003Je06); 530.77|g M1+E2 to 4(-). L(p,t)=3 from 0+ for an unresolved doublet at 4067 {I5} (1972Sh27) 
T$from RDM in ({+10}B,pn|g) (1979Ek03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$(5,6) from |g excitation functions in ({+3}He,n|g) (2003Je06); 6- from shell-model prediction (1998Br34). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=8 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+28}Si,2|a|g) (1996Ca38); 1743.5|g E2 to 6+; band assignment 
T$other: <0.8 ps from ({+14}N,np|g) (1979Ek03); a value of 0.52 ps {I17} is from DSAM in 1979Ek03, but not adopted in their level scheme 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this level with J=8 is proposed in 1996Ca38 only in ({+28}Si,2|a|g) and could be the same level as the 9871 level proposed by 1998Br34, which has the similar deexciting gamma and nearly identical T{-1/2} from DSAM. 
T$from DSAM in ({+28}Si,2|a|g) (1996Ca38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin>8 from |g excitation function in ({+10}B,pn|g) (1979Ha45); 1875.6|g to 8+ is stretched (|DJ=2) quadrupole or |DJ=0 dipole, and can not be M2 based on RUL 
T$other: <0.7 ps indicated by the width of 1878|g in ({+14}N,np|g) (1979Ek03) 
$Evidence for spin alignment from backbending in ({+40}Ca,np|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$see a possible level at E=6278, which could the same level as this level based on the de-exciting gamma and T{-1/2} 
J$from band assignment and shell-model prediction (1998Br34) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J$proposed by 1998Br34. The authors note that |g(|q) of 1973Ku10 (assigning 6+) in {+40}Ca({+10}B,np|g) and 1975Ha04 (assigning 6+) and 1979Ha45 (assigning 6-) in {+34}S({+16}O,2n|g), which were interpreted as quadrupole, would also be consistent with |DJ=0 dipole character and that negative parity is strongly suggested by systematics and 4- is from Shell-model prediction. Other: J=5 proposed by 1996Ca38 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this level with J=8 proposed in 1996Ca38 only. It could be the same level as the 9871 level proposed by 1998Br34, which has the similar deexciting gamma and nearly identical T{-1/2} from DSAM. 
T$from DSAM in 1996Ca38 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=1.7 mb/sr {I4} at |q{-max}=0|' (1974Ev02) 
$d|s/d|W(|q=0|')=0.15 mb/sr {I9} (1967Mi02), 1.25 mb/sr {I5} (1975Al05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: tentative 720 {I30} (1967Mi02) 
$d|s/d|W=0.08 mb/sr {I2} at |q{-max}=15|' (1974Ev02) 
$|s/|s(g.s.)=0.42 {I23} at |q=0|' (1967Mi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 5480 {I50} (1975Al05), 5330 (1974FiZG) 
$d|s/d|W=0.48 mb/sr {I10} at |q{-max}=0|' (1974Ev02) 
$d|s/d|W(|q=0|')=0.59 mb/sr {I6} (1975Al05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 8800 {I50} (1975Al05), 8840 (1974FiZG) 
$d|s/d|W=0.54 mb/sr {I11} at |q{-max}=0|' (1974Ev02) 
$d|s/d|W(|q=0|')=0.66 mb/sr {I6} (1975Al05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$IAS({+48}V,3.70 MeV) (1975Al05). Other: 9540 {I50} (1975Al05) 
$d|s/d|W=0.92 mb/sr {I19} at |q{-max}=0|' (1974Ev02) 
$d|s/d|W(|q=0|')=1.09 mb/sr {I5} (1975Al05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$other: 11200 {I100} (1975Al05) 
$d|s/d|W=0.48 mb/sr {I9} at |q{-max}=0|' (1974Ev02) 
$d|s/d|W(|q=0|')=0.6 mb/sr {I2} (1975Al05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(-)
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from |g excitation function and |g|g(|q) (2003Je06). Other: (6+) proposed in 1974Ka24 with no argument given 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3(-)
level_comment:
J$spin=3 from |g excitation function and |g|g(|q); |p=- suggested by shell-model calculations (2003Je06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 780 {I30} (1971Br52), 750 {I20} (1972Sh27), 670 {I60} (1969MaZR) 
L$also from 1971Br52, 1972Sh27, 1969MaZR 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$1969MaZR report a group at 1630 {I60} with L=(0,4), which is relatively weak (2% of g.s.) and probably a doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 1840 {I30} (1971Br52), 1840 {I20} (1972Sh27) 
L$also from 1972Sh27. Other: L=0 (1971Br52) is discrepant. The |s(|q) in 1971Br52 has much less data points than that of 1972Sh27 and the fit (L=0) appears not as good as that (L=4) in 1972Sh27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 3620 {I30} (1971Br52), 3590 {I20} (1972Sh27) 
L$from: L=3 (1971Br52), L=2 (1971Do18), and L=(2,3) (1972Sh27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 4060 {I30} (1971Br52), 4050 {I20} (1972Sh27, doublet) 
L$others: L=2+3 for a doublet (1972Sh27); L=4 from 1971Br52, but it appears not to fit |s(|q) well 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$others: 4280 {I30} (1971Br52), 4240 {I20} (1972Sh27) 
L$from: L=(0) (1971Do18), L=0 (1971Br52), L=0 (1972Sh27) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=2 from 752|g(|q) in 1979Ha45 and 1973Ku10 
T$weighted average of 7.3 ps {I8} from RDM in 1979Ek03, 6.7 ps {I18} from RDM in 1973Ku10, and 8.43 ps {I49} from measured |t=12.16 ps {I14}(stat) {I69}(syst) (rounded to 12.2 ps {I7}) by 2017Ar09 using RDM, determined from the feeding corrected intensity distribution of the 752|g (first 2+ to g.s. transition) with gate on the shifted part of the 1743|g (first 8+ to first 6+ transition). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$spin=4 from 1106|g(|q) (1979Ha45,1973Ku10) and |g excitation function (1979Ha45) 
T$from RDM in 1973Ku10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$(5-) proposed in 1994Ca04 with no arguments; 6- from 1979Ha45 based on 1675|g(|q) (using {+34}S({+16}O,2n|g)) showing a quadrupole character, |g excitation function pointing to high spin, and systematics disfavoring E1 or M1 for 1675|g. But note that 1675|g(|q) in 1979Ha45 and 1973Ku10 are also consistent with |DJ=0 dipole character. 
T$unweighted average of 4.1 ns {I4} from 1675|g(t) in 1979Ha45 and 2.5 ns {I7} from RDM in 1979Ek03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5(-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$(6-) proposed in 1994Ca04 with no arguments; 7- from 1979Ha45 based on 531|g(|q) showing a strong dipole to 3531 levels with J|p=6- proposed by 1979Ha45. 
T$from RDM in 1979Ek03. Other: <42 ps from RDM in 1973Ku10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,J$this level is only proposed in 1994Ca04, with no evidence for decay to negative-parity or 4+ states. This level is not confirmed in later studies. It is considered questionable by the evaluator and is not adopted in Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_comment:
J$spin>8 from |g excitation function (1979Ha45); evidence for spin alignment from backbending (1992CaZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$this value from 1975Ha04 is discrepant with those from RDM in other (HI,xn|g) measurements (see Adopted Levels). 1979Ek03 from {+36}Ar({+14}N,np|g) explain that this discrepancy might be due to a restriction imposed by 1975Ha04 on normalization constants for obtaining intensity ratio in RDM. Without that restriction, the re-analysis by 1979Ek03 of the data from 1975Ha04 gives T{-1/2}=8.7 ps {I24}, which is in agreement with results from other studies. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(-)
level_comment:
J$6+ from 1975Ha04 and 6- from 1979Ha45, based on 1675|g(|q) showing a quadrupole character. But note that their 1675|g(|q) data are also consistent with a |DJ=0 dipole character. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$from DSAM centrod-shift analysis (1979Ek03). Other: 1979Ek03 also report a lifetime=0.63 ps {I20} from DSAM, but not adopt it in view of uncertainties in feeding times for heavy-ion fusion evaporation reactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$5(-) is proposed by 1979Ek03 based on |g(|q) 
T$DSA measured but no T{-1/2} given from it by 1979Ek03. It is only stated in 1979Ek03 that the result from RDM is consistent with their DSA measurement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$6+ or 8+ from |g(|q,pol), 8+ favored from yield curve (1979Ek03). 
T$from lifetime<1.2 ps as adopted in the level scheme in 1979Ek03. Other: 1979Ek03 also report a lifetime=0.75 ps {I24} from DSAM (centroid shift), but not adopted in their level scheme 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$(10+) indicated by the yield curve and decay mode (1979Ek03). 
T$from lifetime<|?1 ps indicated by the width of 1878|g (1979Ek03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J J=5/2 from AB (1976Fu06,1970Jo27). |p=- from L(p,d),({+3}He,|a)=3 
T from 1963Ho17 (V(p,X) E|<84 MeV; 90|g NaI, 1-6 T{-1/2}'s; chem). Other measurements (see 1978Ha15 and 1978LeZA) excluded due to a lack of chem or possible problems in detection methods 
MOMM1 AB ({+53}Cr standard) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J Ne 3/2,7/2 from |g|g(|q) and |g(linear pol) to 7/2- and Ne 9/2 from |g(|q) and |g(linear pol) to 5/2- in (|a,n|g). See (|a,n|g) for suggested |p 
T >3.1 ps in (|a,n|g) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J 3/2-,5/2-,7/2- from log| {Ift}=4.8 {Ivia} 5/2-; Ne 3/2,5/2-,7/2+ from |g(linear pol) to 7/2- and 5/2- in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J 1/2,3/2,5/2 from |g to 1/2+. (3/2+) proposed by 2006Br03 in (|a,n|g) based on their level scheme, particle-rotor and shell model calculations, and comparison with neighboring nuclides 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J D(+Q) |g to 13/2- and J|)J or J|)J-2 E2 to 11/2-; member of K|p=5/2- g.s. band. 
T from {+12}C({+40}Ca,n2p|g),{+40}Ca({+12}C,n2p|g),... 0.28 ps {I7} in (|a,n|g) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J 5/2-,7/2- from L(p,d) or L({+3}He,|a)=3. (5/2-) from J-dependence of L(p,d)=3 |s(|q) and similarity of |s(|q) to g.s. |s(|q); however, in (p,d) 1985Fu03 note that there is a question of whether the f7/2 orbital is occupied so much (C{+2}S=0.35) in an N=26 nucleus. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 7/2-,9/2+ from D,E2 |g's to 5/2+ and 11/2-. 9/2+ proposed by 2006Br03 in (|a,n|g) based on their level scheme, particle-rotor and shell model calculations, and comparison with neighboring nuclides 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J 5/2-,7/2- from L(p,d) or L({+3}He,|a)=3. (5/2)- proposed by 2006Br03 in (|a,n|g) based on their level scheme, particle-rotor and shell model calculations, and comparison with neighboring nuclides 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J J|)J-1 |g to 17/2- and J|)J-2 E2 |g to 15/2- 
T T{-1/2}>2.1 ps from DSAM in (|a,n|g) discrepant 
MOMM1 From g-factor in ({+40}Ca,n2p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 15/2-,19/2,23/2- from J|)J or J|)J-2 E2 |g to 19/2-. 23/2- from membership in K|p=5/2- g.s. band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |=3/2,7/2 from |g|g(|q)(2168-271-0) and |g(linear pol) to 7/2-. |=9/2 from |g(|q) and |g(linear pol) to 5/2-. 1977Ka19 suggest |p=- based on sys of |p=+ energies in other odd f7/2 nuclides and J|p(2432)=5/2+ 
T >3.1 ps (1977Ka19) discrepant 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J |=3/2,5/2-,7/2+ from |g(linear pol) to 7/2- and 5/2- (33% confidence level) and |=5/2+ from (M1(+E2)) |g to 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E from 1978Fo34 
J |=5/2- from large C{+2}S and |g(|q) 
S 3.60 (separation energy); 3.93 (isospin-dependent) (1978Fo34) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
L 1971Bl09 show good fit for L(n)=5 but conclude only L(n)|>4 or complex configuration; 1978Za03 reach similar conclusions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J 1971Bl09 give 5/2- from L(n)=3 and |g(|q) to 3/2+ 
L,S others: 3, 0.08 {I2} (1978Za03); 3 (1971Bl09); and (2) (1969Da02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J 1971Bl09 give 5/2- based on L(n)=3 and |G(|Q) to 3/2+. However, see comment on L. Discrepant with 5/2+ proposed by 2006Br03 in (|a,n|g) 
L,S 3,0.30 (1978Za03) but 1985Fu03 note that this is an unresolved doublet and |s(|q) of the whole peak could not be fitted by L|<3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J from J-dependence of L=3 |s(|q) in (p,d) and similarity of |s(|q) to that for the g.s.; however, 1985Fu03 note that there is a question of whether the f7/2 orbital is occupied so much (C{+2}S=0.35) in an N=26 nucleus. 
S 0.77 (separation energy); 0.86 (isospin-dependent) (1978Fo34) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
J 1971Bl09 suggest 1/2- on the basis of isotropy of |S0.45-2.10 MeV |g's and |S1.80-2.10 |g's in |a|g(|q) 
Evaluator suggests that the 3.93-MeV state observed by the other groups should be associated with the 3913 state not the 3938 state as suggested by 1985Fu03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Evaluator suggests that the 4.05-MeV, L=0, state observed by 1978Za03 is associated with this state rather than the 4052 state as indicated by 1985Fu03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J 7/2- from analog-state identification by 1969Da02 
S 1.53 (separation energy); 1.38 (isospin dependent) (1978Fo34) 
Member of IAS({+49}V g.s., 7/2-)? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Tentatively assigned by 1978Za03 as IAS({+49}V 91,5/2-). Not confirmed by 1985Fu03 since this state has |s(|q) similar to that of the 4764 state which is the {+49}V g.s. IAS. It is possible that these two states are members of a split IAS. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Tentatively assigned by 1978Za03 as IAS({+49}V 152, 3/2-). Not confirmed by 1985Fu03 since this state has a |s(|q) similar to that of the 1703 and 1741 states, not the 2612 state; however, from the calculations of 1975Ha22 the assumed parent state at 152 has a configuration similar to the 2612 state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J 3/2+ from analog-state identification by 1969Da02 
S 1.44 (separation energy); 0.95 (isospin-dependent) (1978Fo34) 
Member of IAS({+49}V 748, 3/2+)? 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_comment:
J 1985Fu03 suggest 3/2- based on: |s(|q) similar to the 2612 state; |DE between these states correspond to that between isobaric analog and antianalog state pairs; J|p=1/2- rejected on basis of shell structure. Note that 1978Za03 suggested that the strength of the IAS of {+49}V 1647 state was split between the 6.41-, 6.42-, and 6.47-MeV states. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$Decay mode for fully-ionized {+49}Cr{+24+} 
J$from {+49}Cr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (July 2008 update) 
T$measured half-life of the bare (fully-ionized) {+49}Cr{+24+} (2018Tu03), using Schottky frequency spectrum for (almost stable) {+50}Cr as a reference. This value can be compared with T{-1/2}=42.3 min {I1} for neutral {+49}Cr atom, where %|b{++} decay mode is 92.6% {I4} (from {+49}Cr |b{++} decay dataset in the ENSDF database), based on which expected half-life of bare {+49}Cr ion is 45.7 min {I2}, in reasonable agreement with the measured value of 44.0 min {I27} (2018Tu03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$from search for double beta decay by 2003Bi05 and 1985No03 who measured |g{+|+} (HPGe) and deduced a lower limit on T{-1/2} for 0|n and 2|n modes: >1.8|*10{+17} y (1985No03), >1.3|*10{+18} y (2003Bi05). Other: 1952Fr23. 
$Evaluated rms charge radius: <r{+2}>{+1/2}=3.6588 fm {I65} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated |d<r{+2}>({+50}Cr,{+52}Cr)=0.099 fm{+2} {I37} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E2 783.3|g to 0+ 
T$weighted averaged mean lifetime=13.1 ps {I4} deduced from experimental values in different methods: mean lifetime |t=13.3 ps {I6} (M.M. Giles et al., Phys. Rev. C, accepted April 9, 2019, RDDS in {+40}Ca({+12}C,2p|g)); |t=13.0 ps {I4} (2017Ar09, RDDS in {+27}Al({+28}Si,|ap|g), see ({+28}Si,|a2p|g) dataset); 13.2 ps {I4} (2000Er01,2000Er06, DSAM in Coul. ex.); 12.6 ps {I21} (1974Br04, RDDS in {+40}Ca({+16}O,2p|a|g)); 12.1 ps {I12} (1973De09, RDDS in {+40}Ca({+12}C,2p|g)); 10 ps {I2} (1972Ra14, DSAM in Coul. ex.); and the following mean lifetimes deduced by evaluators from B(E2)|^ measurements in Coulomb excitation: 13.5 ps {I7} (B(E2)=0.102 {I5} in 1975To06); 12.1 ps {I11} (B(E2)=0.115 {I10} in 1972Ra14); 15.2 ps {i17} (B(E2)=0.092 {i14} in 1971DaZM); 12.1 ps {i13} (B(E2)=0.115 {I12} in 1966Mc18,1961Mc18); 9.6 ps {I19} (B(E2)=0.15 {I3} in 1960An09); and |t=14.9 ps {I8} from B(E2)=0.093 {I5} in (e,e') (1983Li02). Omission of seemingly discrepant values of 9.6 ps {I19} from 1960An09 and 15.2 ps {I17} from 1971DaZM gives the same weighted average. Value is 9.11 ps {I+28-20} in 2016Pr01 evaluation. 
MOMM1$from transient-magnetic fields (TF) in Coul. ex. (2000Er06). Others: +1.28 {I22} (1994Pa34, TF in ({+40}Ca,2p|g)); +0.9 {I3} (1987Pa28, TF in Coul. ex.); +1.2 {I2} (ion implantation PAC, 1977Fa07) 
MOME2$reorientation method in Coul. ex. (1975To06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E4) from (e,e') 
J$stretched E2 1098.1|g to 2+; L(p,t)=4 
T$unweighted average of 3.4 ps {I5} (M.M. Giles et al., Phys. Rev. C, accepted April 9, 2019, RDDS in {+40}Ca({+12}C,2p|g)); 1.47 ps {I16} (2004Br42, DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,|a2p)); 1.7 ps {I5} (1998Br34, DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,|a2p)); 2.22 ps {I49} (2000Er06,2000Er01, DSAM in Coulomb excitation); 2.22 ps {I28} (1973De09, RDDS in {+40}Ca({+12}C,2p|g)). Other: <2.8 ps (1974Br04, RDDS). Weighted average is 1.80 ps {I26} with reduced |h{+2}=4.4 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.4. 
MOMM1$from transient-magnetic fields (TF) in Coul. ex. (2000Er06). Other: +1.7 {I4} (1994Pa34,TF in ({+40}Ca,2p|g)) is in disagreement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q,pol) in ({+16}O,|a2p|g); stretched E2 1282.5|g to 4+ 
T$weighted average of 0.69 ps {I14} from DSAM in {+28}Si({+28}Si,|a2p|g) (1998Br34) and 1.25 ps 28 from RDDS in ({+12}C,2p|g) (1973De09) 
MOMM1$from g=0.54 {I16} (1994Pa34, TF in ({+40}Ca,2p|g)). 


