# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR +0.95 {I+26-20} or -0.02 {i6} 
M from |g(|q) in ({+3}He,|a|g) and |DJ|p. The 2662|g and the 2602|g were not resolved and were analyzed together. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI based on (|a,n|g), the evaluator has assumed that the 5321 level decays mostly through the 1455|g. 
M Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); E2 from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR 2630|g and 2590|g not resolved in coincidence spectrum and, therefore, were analyzed together. |d=+0.95 {I+26-20} or -0.02 {i6} if J=7/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
AG(THETA) ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT AFTER SUBTRACTING 5560G CONTRIBUTION FROM SPECTRUM 
MR +0.27 {i6} or -3.7 {i8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
AG(THETA) ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT AFTER SUBTRACTING 6000G CONTRIBUTION FROM SPECTRUM 
MR +0.03 {i9} or -1.8 {i4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ q{-k}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.65 {I10}, X(E0/E2)=0.53 {I9}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.63|*10{+-5} {I10} (2005Ki02 evaluation) 
TI$0.021% {I3} decay of level in (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: branching=24% {I3} in (|g,|g') work of 2000Ba63 seems in error, the level in (|g,|g') is considered as the same as in other reactions and decays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$35 {I16} for 5359.3|g+5452.2|g, assuming the main placements of these |g rays are from 8395 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$branching=38% {I6} in (|g,|g'), but other two transitions proposed to feed levels for which there is not much evidence from other studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ 2683|g shown in level scheme figure 3 of 2009Jo03, the energy and intensity are from e-mail reply of Nov 14, 2009 from D. Rudolph 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$ E1 in table II of 2009Jo03 seems a misprint 
$ Final level J|p=11- in table II seems a misprint, should be 11+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$ DRI=10 in table ^II of 2009Jo03 should be 1, according to email reply of Nov 14, 2009 from D. Rudolph 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$ this |g was inadvertently left out in 2009Jo03, according to email reply of Nov 14, 2009 from D. Rudolph 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$ DRI=11 in table ^II of 2009Jo03 should be 1, according to email reply of Nov 14, 2009 from D. Rudolph 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$|G{-0}/|G=0.24 {I3} in 2000Ba63 seems in error, assuming that the 3595 level observed here is the same as the one reported in {+58}Cu decay, (p,p'|g) and (n,n'|g). It should be 0.63 {I3} according to adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.174 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.024 {I14} 
MR weighted average of -1.1 {I2} (1971St02) and -1.1 {I2} (1969Va24) whose reported value is -1.14 {I+11-19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E from {+58}Cu |e decay 
RI from I(|g+ce)=80% {I2} (1971St02) and |a. Other: 74 {I4} (1969Va24) 
M |a=0.48 {I5} from I(|g+ce) balance in |g|g (1971St02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.06 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I16} 
RI$from I(|g+ce)=10% {I1} (1971St02), assuming that internal conversion was taken into account by 1971St02. Other: 13 {I3} (1969Va24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.08 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I9} 
RI from I(|g+ce)=10% {I1} (1971St02). Other: 14 {I3} (1969Va24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI weighted average of 1.9|*10{+-4} {I3} (1981Pa10) and 2.2|*10{+-4} {I5} (1971Wa13) per decay for the internal pair decay branch. The transition probability associated with K-shell internal conversion is about 4% of the pair formation (1986PaZM) and is included. 
|r{+2}=0.0000062 {I12} (1981Pa10,1986Pa23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from 1971St02. Other: +0.65 or +0.60 with a large |h{+2} value (1969Va24) 
A{-2}=+0.493 {I31}, A{-4}=+0.041 {I43} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI internal pair decay branch from I(pairs,3530)/Ice(K)(2077|g)=13.9 {I22} and |a(K)(2077)=4.8|*10{+-5} (1981Pa10). The transition probability associated with K-shell internal conversion is about 2% of the pair formation probability (1986PaZM) and is included. 
|r{+2}=0.0008 {I3} (1981Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1971St02. Gammas from the cascade through the 2459 and 2775 could not be resolved; it is estimated that the branch to the 2459 level is stronger by at least a factor of 3 (1971St02) 
MR -0.19 {I15} or -2.8 {I+16-15} (1971St02) who also assume the contribution of the 3774 to 2459 to 1454 cascade to be negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$average of 38 {I2} at E(p)=8.295 MeV and 43 {I2} at E(p)=8.286 MeV (1971St02) 
M A{-2}=+0.19 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I13} 
MR from 1971St02 at E(p)=8.295 MeV, and -0.31 {I+912-11} at E(p)=8.286 MeV; -0.10 {I16} or +3.2 {I+44-13} (1969Va24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$average of 49 {I2} at E(p)=8.295 MeV and 44 {I2} at E(p)=8.286 MeV (1971St02). Other: I|g(4107|g)/I|g(2655|g)=0.75 {I9} (1969Va24) is in agreement with 0.87 {I6} adopted here 
M A{-2}=+0.43 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.230 {I+50-80}, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.46 {I7} 
$E0 transition matrix element=0.103 b {I+11-20} 
$|d(E2/M1) is from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.63|*10{-5} {I10}, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.65 {I10} (from evaluation by 2005Ki02: At. Data and Nucl. Data tables 89, 77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.20 {I4} or +1.48 {I13} 
$|r{+2}(E0)<0.070, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)<0.7 for |d(E2/M1)=0.20 {I4} 
$|r{+2}(E0)<0.022, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)<0.01 for |d(E2/M1)=1.48 {I13} 
$E0 transition matrix element<0.06 b for |d(E2/M1)=0.20 {I4}, 0.03 for |d(E2/M1)=1.48 {I13} 
$Two sets of B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values are for |d(E2/M1)=0.20 {I4} and 1.48 {I13}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.24 {I4} or +1.42 {I10} 
$|r{+2}(E0)<0.120, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)<1.3 for |d(E2/M1)=0.24 {I4} 
$|r{+2}(E0)<0.080, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)<0.05 for |d(E2/M1)=1.42 {I10} 
$E0 transition matrix element<0.07 b for |d(E2/M1)=0.24 {I4}, 0.05 for |d(E2/M1)=1.42 {I10} 
$Two sets of B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values are for |d(E2/M1)=0.24 {I4} and 1.42 {I10}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from level energy 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.08 {I3}, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.27 {I4} (from evaluation by 2005Ki02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -0.04 {I27} from ({+3}He,2p|g), -0.11 {I4} from (C,2pn|g), 0.00 {I1}, +0.11 {I3}, -0.05 {I5} from (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of data from (n,|g) E=thermal, {+59}Cu |e decay, and (|a,n|g). Other: 4.2 {I4} (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of +4.8 {I+9-8} (|a,n|g) and +4.3 {I8} ({+3}He,2p|g). Other: +9 {I3} (C,2pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of data from (n,|g) E=thermal, {+59}Cu |e decay, and (p,n|g). Other: 30.1 {I22} ({+29}Si,2|a2p|g). 
MR from (|a,n|g), |d(Q,O)=+0.10 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI Unweighted ave. of data from |e decay and (n,|g) Thermal. Others: 30 {I16} (|a,n|g), 28 {I3} (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -0.03 {I7}, -0.09 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and -0.18 {I+7-5} from ({+3}He,2p|g). Other: -1.28 {I15} (p,n|g) - discrepant datum - an unweighted ave of all data would result |d=-0.4 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Energy - weighted average - intensity - unweighted average of data from (n,|g) E=thermal, (p,n|g), and (|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I12} ({+29}Si,2|a2p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of data from (|a,n|g), ({+3}He,2p|g), (n,|g) Thermal, and ({+12}C,2pn|g). 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp in ({+3}He,2p|g); Q from (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Using the method of limitation of statistical weight of data from |e decay, (p,n|g) and (n,|g) thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E Unweighted average of data from (|a,n|g), ({+12}C,2pn|g), and ({+3}He,2p|g). 
MR from (|a,n|g). Other: -0.9 {I+5-9} ({+3}He,2p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from level scheme figure 1 of 2002Yu01, only a small fraction of the total intensity of 1609|g belongs at this location. Adopted I|g(1609)/I|g(1948)=0.64 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I10}; DCO(1400|g,339|g)=0.47 {I5}, DCO(1428|g,339|g)=0.50 {I5}. 
MR -2.5 {I5} also possible from |g(|q) but excluded on basis of measured DCO ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+D
decay_comment:
MR +0.35 {I5} also possible. 
A{-2}=+0.24 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.30 {I10}; DCO(1338|g,999|g)=1.10 {I10}; DCO(999|g,339|g)=0.55 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7}; DCO(764|g,1428|g)=1.94 {I10}, DCO(764|g,1367|g)=1.8 {I3}; DCO(764|g,1610|g)=1.2 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.21 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I10}; DCO(806|g,1428|g)=1.95 {I20}; DCO(806|g,1610|g)=1.15 {I20}; DCO(806|g,764|g)=0.93 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.153 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I5} (1974Mo02). A{-2}=-0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1976Pi05). 
MR weighted average of 0.00 {I1} (1974Mo02), +0.11 {I3} (1973Hu03), -0.05 {I5} (1968Bi03). -3.7 {I7} also possible (1973Hu03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.177 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.022 {I17} (1974Mo02); A{-2}=+0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} (1976Pi05). 
$Pol=+0.1+0.7 (1974Mo02) 
MR weighted average of +0.09 {I4} (1973Hu03), +0.06 {I6} (1976Pi05), 0.00 {I12} (1974Mo02). +4.0 {I+15-10} also possible (1974Mo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} (1976Pi05). 
MR from 1973Hu03; -1.7 {I5} also possible. Other: -0.76 {I12} (1976Pi05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.321 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.175 {I25} (1974Mo02). A{-2}=+0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1976Pi05). 
$Pol=-0.15, +0.8 (1974Mo02) 
Other |d: +8 {I+7-3} (1973Hu03), +2.8 {I+19-9} (1976Pi05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E 1337.8 {I1} for doublet in 1976Pi05 where this transition contributes approximately 85% of I|g(doublet) (based on adopted 1338 level branching). 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1974Mo02). A{-2}=+0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1976Pi05). 
M,MR from 1974Mo02. |d(Q,O)=+0.10 {I+9-10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI E=1339.5 {I10} for doublet in 1973Hu03; I(1680|g)/I(1338|g+1340|g) is much greater in spectrum of 1973Hu03 than in spectra of 1974Mo02, 1976Pi05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI from 1974Mo02. 
A{-2}=-0.42 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1974Mo02). A{-2}=-0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1976Pi05). 
MR weighted average of -0.03 {I7} (1976Pi05), -0.09 {I5} (1973Hu03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
RI from 1974Mo02. 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1974Mo02). A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (1976Pi05). 
$Pol=+0.4, +0.8 (1974Mo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (1974Mo02); A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1976Pi05). 
$Pol=+0.6, +1.4 (1974Mo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E multiply placed |g transition, unless E|a<10 MeV. 
RI estimated by evaluator from branching ratio for 1948 level and I|g. 
A{-2}=-0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I3} (1976Pi05) for doublet dominated by this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E from 1976Pi05. 
A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4} (1976Pi05). 
MR -11 {I+3-6} from 1976Pi05, assuming J=11/2 to J=9/2 transition (cf. adopted 13/2 to 11/2 sequence). A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 2574.29 {I21} (2004Ra23) and 2574.62 {I11} (1993Ha05). Uncertainty lowest input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$alternative placement: 5131->1679 transition. 
E$Weighted average of 3452.08 {I17} (2004Ra23) and 3452.37 {I8} (1993Ha05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$alternative placement: 6948->4140 transition (2004Ra23) 
E$Weighted average of 2808.09 {I5} (2004Ra23) and 2808.19 {I4} (1993Ha05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 2541.30 {I22} (2004Ra23) and 2541.49 {I12} (1993Ha05). An additional placement from 5995.2 keV level is not confirmed in 2004Ra23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$alternative placement: 6948->3686 transition. 
E$Weighted average of 3262.01 {I18} (2004Ra23) and 3262.32 {I11} (1993Ha05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$alternative placement: 6562->2421 transition. 
E$Weighted average of 4140.10 {I8} (2004Ra23) and 4140.05 {I7} (1993Ha05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 5546.80 {I14} (5546.8 probably a typo in 2004Ra23) and 5546.62 {I11} (1993Ha05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 5621.60 {I14} (5621.6 probably a typo in 2004Ra23) and 5621.41 {I11} (1993Ha05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=200|*10{+-5} {I10} 
A{-2}=-0.142 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2}; |d=-2.8 {I+8-16} or -0.05 {I+28-26} (favored by |a(K)exp datum). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=150|*10{+-5} {I30} 
$A{-2}=-0.317 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I1}; |d=-0.18 {I+7-5} (favored by |a(K)exp datum) or -3 {I+2-4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
MR A{-2}=+0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1968Bi03) as expected for 5/2 to 3/2 transition. A{-2}=-0.08 {I4} from 1972Ab16. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR from 1983Mi01. 
A{-2}=-0.026 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I4} (1983Mi01). Placement from 1735 level in 1971Kr12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
From 1971Kr12. Similar E|g attributed to Al(p,d) by 1967St19; therefore, placement is shown as tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Kr12; absent in 1967St19. A comparable 2001.93 keV 10 |g-ray is unplaced in 2004Ra23 (n,|g). |g ray not adopted by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from text of 1995Wu01. Identified as {+59}Ni line through its correlation with known {+160}Dy |g's. However, see comment on 1170 level energy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR av of +0.67 {I21} from {+60}Ni(p,p'|g), and +1.2 {I3} from {+60}Cu |e decay. Poor agreement with +0.03 {I+1-25} from {+56}Fe({+7}Li,2np|g). -0.2 {I2} from DCO (2008To15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(E|+) from 1961Pa10 is given 
Ice(K)(2285)/Ice(K)(952)=0.074 {I16}, Ice(K)(2285)/I(pair)=0.130 {I28}, B(E0)/B(E2)=0.027 {I4}, |r{+2}<0.028 (1981Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
BE2W RECALCULATED BY B. SINGH WITH NEW T VALUE 1/96 
MR from {+60}Co |b{+-} decay (1925.28 d). Others: -0.09 {I+50-30} from {+58}Ni(|a,2p|g), +0.02 {I+18-2} from {+56}Fe({+7}Li,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E4]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_comment:
E$from E(level) 
M from J|p's of connecting levels. 
BE4W RECALCULATED BY B. SINGH WITH NEW T VALUE 1/96 
BE4W 4.8 {I10} from measured B(E4)|^ in {+60}Ni(e,e'). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(E|+) from 1961Pa10 is given 
I(pair)(3318)/Ice(K)(1986)=11.5 {I12}, B(E0)/B(E2)=0.49 {I8}, |r{+2}=0.077 {I42} (1981Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI I(E|+) from 1961Pa10 is given 
I(pair)(3588)/Ice(K)(2256)=68 {I11}, B(E0)/B(E2)(1429)=0.13 {I3}, B(E0)/B(E2)(2256)=2.9 {I5} (1981Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I{-|g}(1332)=(100.00 - I{-|g}(2158)[1.0+|a(2158)] - I{-|g}(2505)[1.0+|a(2505)]) / [1.00+|a(1332)+|a{-|p}(1332)]= 99.9988 {i2} / 1.000162 {i6}. In the evaluation 1991BaZS, this is computed in the same fashion, but is given as 99.983% {i6}; the origin of the larger uncertainty is not clear. 
CC |a and |a{-K} from 1985HaZA evaluation of measured values; from theory (1976Ba63) |a=1.25x10{+-4}, |a{-K}=1.14x10{+-4}, and |a{-L}=1.13x10{+-5}. 
CC |a{-|p}=3.4*10{+-5} {i4} interpolated from theoretical values of 1979Sc31; 3.0|*10{+-5} {I3} (1994GrZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI from consideration of 0.0012 {i2} (1955Wo44), <0.002 (1969Ra23), 0.0092 {i16} (1970Di01), 0.0005 {i2} (1972Le14), 0.0020 {i13} (1973Fu15), and 0.00111 {i18} (1976Ca18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI from consideration of <0.005 (1955Wo44), 0.0078 {i12} (1969Va20), <0.006 (1970Di01), 0.00758 {i50} (1976Ca18), and 0.0069 {i10} (1977Lo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
RI from I{-|g}(1173)=(I{-|b-}(2505) - I{-|g}(347)[1.0+|a(347)] - I{-|g}(2505)[1.0+|a(2505)]) / [1.00+|a(1173)+|a{-|p}(1173)]= 99.87 {i3} / 1.000174 {i4}. 
MR from 1980Kr05. 
CC from 1985HaZA evaluation of measured values; from theory (1976Ba63) |a=1.65x10{+-4}, |a{-K}=1.50x10{+-4}, and |a{-L}=1.48x10{+-5} {i4} 
CC |a{-|p}=6.2*10{+-6} {i7} interpolated from theoretical values of 1979Sc31; this value is negligible since it is only about 5% of the corresponding |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
RI from consideration of <4x10{+-5} (1970Di01), 9x10{+-6} {i7} (1973Fu15), <1x10{+-3} (1977HaXC), 2.0x10{+-6} {i4} (1978Fu05), and 5.2x10{+-6} {i20} (1988Se09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Adopted Gammas of {+60}Ni in ENSDF database 
$I{-s,f}=8.2 eVb 7 
$ W(90|')/W(130|')=0.76 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I{-s,f}=7.8 eVb 22 
$ W(90|')/W(130|')=0.74 {I21} 
E$ alternatively, 5131.6|g can be placed from a 7415-keV level to 2285, 0+ level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I{-s,f}=64 eVb 19 
$ W(90|')/W(130|')=1.04 {I50} 
E$assignment to this level is tentative and it is based on better energy-difference agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ also +3 to +15 (or +9 {I6}) 
$DCO=1.02 {I8} 
$ DCO=1.09 {I8} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=1.02 {I7} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$ -0.14 to +0.65 
E$ level-energy difference=493.9 
$DCO=0.64 {I9} 
$ DCO=0.99 {I4} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.88 {I4} for 30|', 53|', gated on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.43 {I6} for 53|', 83|', gated on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-0.10 {I8} or +1.4 {I5} 
$DCO=0.95 {I4} 
$ DCO=1.02 {I4} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.97 {I4} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ +0.02 to +0.35 
$DCO=0.84 {I4} 
E$ level-energy difference=677.0 
$ DCO=0.83 {I4} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.85 {I4} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.78 {I6} 
$ DCO=1.07 {I8} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.88 {I6} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.95 {I6} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.98 {I6} 
$ DCO=1.16 {I6} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.08 {I5} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=1.03 {I5} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.07 {I8} 
$ DCO=1.05 {I6} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.99 {I8} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.94 {I10} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.08 {I9} 
$ DCO=1.70 {I8} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.33 {I5} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.30 {I5} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.48 {I7} 
$ DCO=0.98 {I4} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.03 {I4} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.07 {I5} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.07 {I5} 
$ DCO=1.33 {I6} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.75 {I7} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.25 {I5} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.06 {I9} 
$ DCO=0.93 {I7} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.89 {I7} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=1.07 {I8} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.61 {I3} 
$ DCO=1.06 {I5} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.77 {I4} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.80 {I4} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.65 {I4} 
$ DCO=1.07 {I5} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.85 {I5} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.81 {I4} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.59 {I4} 
$ DCO=1.10 {I5} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.91 {I6} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.79 {I5} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.96 {I16} @ 
$ DCO=0.77 {I11} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.92 {I11} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.90 {I11} 
$ DCO=0.90 {I4} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.89 {I5} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.02 {I5} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.88 {I8} @ 
$ DCO=0.95 {I8} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.98 {I7} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.92 {I7} @ 
$ DCO=0.89 {I7} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.03 {I7} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.75 {I8} 
$ DCO=1.04 {I4} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.97 {I5} for 30|' 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.03 {I5} for 53|' 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.57 {I5} 
$ DCO=0.98 {I7} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=0.87 {I6} for 30|', 53|' 
$ DCO=0.77 {I5} for 53|', 83|' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.64 {I12} 
$ DCO=1.00 {I4} for gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.05 {I6} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.04 {I5} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.89 {I9} @ 
$ DCO=0.92 {I12} for 30|', 53|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 
$ DCO=1.08 {I7} for 53|', 83|', gate on |DJ=1 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.150 {I+90-110}, q{-K}{+2}=0.4 {I+2-3} 
$E0 transition matrix element=0.09 b {I+2-4} 
$|d(E2/M1) is weighted average of +0.40 {I+5-4} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); and +0.63 {I+13-10} from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g) in the present work. The second solution of |d(E2/M1)=+1.10 {I+9-10} from |g(|q) data in (n,n'|g) is inconsistent with value from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g), as well as with several previous values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level energy 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.078 {I+66-42}, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.29 {I3} (from evaluation by 2005Ki02: At. Data and Nucl. Data tables 89, 77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.04 {I5} or +2.3 {I+4-3} 
$Two sets of B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values are for |d(E2/M1)=0.04 {I5} and +2.3 {I+4-3}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.01 {I2} or +2.62 {I+16-14} 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.040 {I+200-30}, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=150 {+1000-150} for |d(E2/M1)=0.01 {I2} 
$|r{+2}(E0)<0.20, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)<0.3 for |d(E2/M1)=+2.62 {I+16-14} 
$E0 transition matrix element=0.04 b {+6-2} for |d(E2/M1)=0.01 {I2}, <0.08 b for |d(E2/M1)=+2.62 {I+16-14} 
$Two sets of B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values are for |d(E2/M1)=0.01 {I2} and +2.62 {I+16-14}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level energy 
$|r{+2}(E0)>0.00043, q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=1.26 {I20} (from evaluation by 2005Ki02: At. Data and Nucl. Data tables 89, 77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
MR$from method 1 in 2019Sm03. 
$|d=-0.0019 {I22}, A{-2}=+0.1002 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.0094 {I2} (method 1). 
$|d=-0.0015 {I23}, A{-2}=+0.101 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I2} (method 2) 
$|d=-0.0013 {I28}, A{-2}=+0.102 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I2} (method 3) 
$|d=-0.0023 {I28}, A{-2}=+0.102 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I2} (method 4) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay and ({+7}Li,|an|g). Others: 28.8 {I14} in (|a,n|g) and 55 in Coul. ex. seem discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g), (|a,n|g), ({+7}Li,|an|g), and Coul. ex. 
RI$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, (|a,n|g), and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, (|a,n|g), ({+7}Li,|an|g), and Coul. ex. 
RI$unweighted average from (n,|g), |e decay and (|a,n|g). Weighted average is 73.1 {I27} with large reduced |h{+2}=14. 
M$from POL and ADO ratio in ({+7}Li,|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, (|a,n|g), ({+7}Li,|an|g), and Coul. ex. 
RI$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, (|a,n|g), and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 
RI$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$weighted average from (n,|g) and (|a,n|g). Other: I|g=94 {I13} in ({+7}Li,|an|g) is in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, (|a,n|g) and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 
E$unweighted average from (n,|g), |e decay, (|a,n|g) and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$other: I|g=23 in (p,p'|g). Evaluator treats this transition as uncertain since it is not reported in (n,|g), (|a,n|g) and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$weighted average of values from |e decay and (n,|g) 
M$|DJ=1, D+Q from ADO ratio in ({+7}Li,|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$LWM, weighted average from |e decay, (n,|g) and (|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average from |e decay, (n,|g) and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g), (|a,n|g) and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 
RI$weighted average from (n,|g) and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (n,|g) and (|a,n|g). 
RI$unweighted average from (n,|g) and (|a,n|g). Other: I|g(1930)/I|g(1089)=91 {I18}/100 {I18} in ({+7}Li,|an|g) is larger than the adopted ratio of 12 {I4}/23.7 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (|a,n|g) and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 
RI$unweighted average from (|a,n|g) and ({+7}Li,|an|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this |g, implied as M3 from |DJ|p is not confirmed in any other |g-ray study where this level is populated. Evaluators consider it questionable, as B(M3)(W.u.) is unacceptably large, and do not include in the Adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=39.3 {I13} (1988Sa26), 36.9 {I12} (1978Me10), 59 {I15} (1969Ri04), 50 {I5} (1967Bo01), 41 {I3} (1967Sc02), 38 {I4} (1967Be12). Other: 41 (1971VoZX) 
E$uncertainty=0.003 in 1978Me10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.002 in 1978Me10 
RI$unweighted average: I|g=113.2 {I27} (1988Sa26), 126 {I3} (1982Gr10, uncertainty estimated by evaluator), 117.2 {I24} (1978Me10), 113 {I6} (1969Ri04), 148 {I8} (1967Bo01), 128 {I4} (1967Sc02), 109 {I11} (1967Be12). Weighted average is 120 {I3}, but with reduced |h{+2}=5.0 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.005 in 1978Me10 
RI$weighted average: I|g=19.9 {I5} (1988Sa26), 21.2 {I5} (1982Gr10), 20.2 {I6} (1978Me10), 19.8 {I16} (1969Ri04), 22.3 {I9} (1967Sc02), 20.2 {I20} (1967Bo01), 16.5 {I17} (1967Be12). Other: 16.0 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.009 in 1978Me10 
RI$weighted average: I|g=10.83 {I19} (1988Sa26), 11.40 {I27} (1982Gr10), 11.25 {I12} (1978Me10), 10.7 {I4} (1969Ri04), 11.9 {I4} (1967Sc02), 10.6 {I32} (1967Bo01), 11.3 {I11} (1967Be12). Other: 10.4 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.004 in 1978Me10 
$I|g=100.0 {I17} (1988Sa26), 100.0 {I24} (1982Gr10), 100.0 {I23} (1978Me10, 2% uncertainty assigned by evaluator), 100 {I4} (1969Ri04), 100 {I3} (1967Sc02), 100 {I5} (1967Bo01), 100 {I10} (1967Be12). Other: 100 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average (NRM): I|g=1.99 {I6} (1988Sa26), 2.47 {I10} (1982Gr 2.32 {I9} (1978Me10), 2.21 {I9} (1969Ri04), 2.29 {I13} (1967Sc02), 1.7 {I8} (1967Bo01), 2.45 {I25} (1967Be12). Uncertainty was doubled in 1988Sa26 for averaging procedure. Other: 1.6 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=10.22 {I19} (1988Sa26), 10.47 {I29} (1982Gr10), 11.4 {I4} (1978Me10), 10.9 {I5} (1969Ri04), 10.3 {I5} (1967Sc02), 9.6 {I10} (1967Bo01), 10.7 {I11} (1967Be12). Other: 8.0 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from branching ratios in Adopted dataset. Measured values in this decay are: 0.097 {I34} (1988Sa26), <0.012 (1978Me10). Value from 1988Sa26 seems too high. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average (NRM): I|g=2.85 {I7} (1988Sa26), 3.28 {I13} (1982Gr10), 3.39 {I7} (1978Me10), 3.84 {I16} (1969Ri04), 3.30 {I16} (1967Sc02), 2.5 {I12} (1967Bo01), 4.0 {I4} (1967Be12). Uncertainty got adjusted to 0.21 in 1988Sa26 value in the averaging procedure. Other: 1.6 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average: I|g=0.392 {I34} (1988Sa26), 0.62 {I11} (1978Me10), 0.31 {I19} (1969Ri04), 0.57 {I10} (1967Sc02), 0.75 {I10} (1967Be12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average (NRM): I|g=2.28 {I6} (1988Sa26), 2.51 {I9} (1982Gr10), 2.66 {I9} (1978Me10), 3.55 {I28} (1969Ri04), 2.60 {I13} (1967Sc02), 2.3 {I8} (1967Bo01), 2.9 {I3} (1967Be12). Uncertainties got adjusted to 0.13 in 1988Sa26 and 0.40 in 1969Ri04. Other: 2.4 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=0.447 {I34} (1988Sa26), 0.56 {I5} (1978Me10), 0.48 {I15} (1969Ri04), 0.40 {I7} (1967Sc02), 0.68 {I10} (1967Be12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.83 {I4} (1988Sa26), 0.93 {I4} (1978Me10), 1.09 {I17} (1969Ri04), 0.64 {I13} (1967Sc02), 0.60 {I18} (1967Bo01), 0.80 {I11} (1967Be12). Other: 0.6 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=3.49 {I8} (1988Sa26), 3.63 {I14} (1982Gr10), 3.9 {I7} (1978Me10), 4.1 {I3} (1969Ri04), 3.4 {I3} (1967Sc02), 2.0 {I10} (1967Bo01), 4.2 {I4} (1967Be12). Other: 2.4 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average: I|g=0.30 {I4} (1988Sa26), 0.46 {I4} (1978Me10), 0.66 {I17} (1969Ri04), 0.27 {I5} (1967Sc02), 0.43 {I13} (1967Bo01), 0.42 {I7} (1967Be12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=34.8 {I7} (1988Sa26), 36.1 {I9} (1982Gr10), 34.6 {I7} (1978Me10), 34.5 {I10} (1967Sc02), 33.0 {I17} (1967Bo01), 40 {I4} (1967Be12). Others: 28.0 (1971VoZX), 41.7 {I17} (1969Ri04, seems a discrepant value) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average: I|g=0.238 {I20} (1988Sa26), 0.317 {I12} (1978Me10), 0.46 {I5} (1969Ri04), 0.18 {I7} (1967Sc02), 0.29 {I9} (1967Bo01), 0.39 {I10} (1967Be12). Other: 0.24 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=0.197 {I19} (1988Sa26), 0.258 {I24} (1978Me10), 0.37 {I5} (1969Ri04), 0.19 {I6} (1967Sc02), 0.27 {I8} (1967Bo01), 0.28 {I8} (1967Be12). Other: 0.24 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.054 {I34} (1988Sa26) 
E$a 545 {I5} |g also reported by 1969Ri04 in coin with 656|g. |g not reported by 1978Me10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average: I|g=0.302 {I28} (1988Sa26), 0.50 {I4} (1978Me10). Others: 0.21 {I10} (1969Ri04), 0.08 {I6} (1967Sc02), 0.54 {I21} (1967Be12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=0.418 {I27} (1988Sa26), 0.469 {I24} (1978Me10), 0.66 {I12} (1969Ri04), 0.27 {I9} (1967Sc02), 0.43 {I13} (1967Bo01), 0.35 {I11} (1967Be12). Other: 0.36 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=0.490 {I27} (1988Sa26), 0.492 {I24} (1978Me10), 0.56 {I5} (1969Ri04), 0.36 {I10} (1967Sc02), 0.45 {I13} (1967Bo01), 0.42 {I10} (1967Be12). Other: 0.36 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average: I|g=0.500 {I27} (1988Sa26), 0.75 {I5} (1978Me10), 0.50 {I6} (1969Ri04), 0.30 {I8} (1967Sc02), 0.42 {I13} (1967Bo01), 0.42 {I6} (1967Be12). Other: 0.36 (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average: I|g=0.036 {I11} (1988Sa26), 0.035 {I12} (1978Me10), 0.041 {I20} (1969Ri04). Other: 0.16 for a 1990|g (1971VoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted averaged value of 2123.78 {I18} obtained from 2123.432 {I35}, 2124.0 {I7} from (|a,n|g) and 2123.90 {I3} from (n,|g) is listed in Adopted dataset. E|g=2128.0 {I8} in 1967Sc02, 2119.8 {I5} in 1967Bo01 
$I|g=0.384 {I27} (1988Sa26), 0.375 {I24} (1978Me10), 0.44 {I3} (1969Ri04), 0.36 {I11} (1967Sc02), 0.38 {I13} (1967Bo01), 0.42 {I4} (1967Be12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(821)/I|g(1662)=0.079 disagrees with 0.41 {I3} in Adopted dataset where value is taken from (n,|g) and |e decay. It is possible that the low intensity in (|a,n|g) is due to angular distribution effects 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$R{-ADO}=1.08 {I9} 
$I|g(1387)/I|g(1454)=0.94 {I25} disagrees with 0.30 {I4} in the Adopted dataset, where value is taken from (n,|g) and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$R{-ADO}=1.02 {I9} 
$I|g(792)/I|g(1740)=0.61 {I4} disagrees with 0.124 {I23} in the Adopted dataset, where value is taken from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(972)/I|g(1920)=0.45 {I4} disagrees with 0.21 {I4} in the Adopted dataset, where value is taken from (|a,n|g) 
$R{-ADO}=0.69 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(1079)/I|g(1920)=1.49 {I20} disagrees with 0.32 {I4} in the Adopted dataset, where value is taken from (|a,n|g) 
$POL=+0.02 {I2}, P{-S}=+0.40 {I58}. DCO(Q)=1.05 {I4}. R{-ADO}=1.17 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(1930)/I|g(1089)=0.91 {I25} disagrees with 0.51 {I8} in the Adopted Gammas, where value is from (n,|g) and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(955)/I|g(2342)=0.83 {I21} disagrees with 0.27 {I3} in the Adopted Gammas, where value is from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(1394)/I|g(2342)=0.58 {I13} disagrees with 0.15 {I3} in the Adopted Gammas, where value is from (|a,n|g) 
$R{-ADO}=0.90 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$2019Sa04 suggest that this |g ray may correspond to the 1587.8 in (n,|g). This is unlikely as the transition in (n,|g) is from a low-spin (J|p=1/2-,3/2-) level, whereas 2019Sa04 assign their 1589.4 transition from an 11/2+ level 
$R{-ADO}=0.68 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(584)/I|g(593)=2.65 {I22} disagrees with 0.39 {I4} in the Adopted Gammas, where value is from (|a,n|g) 
$R{-ADO}=0.99 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty of 0.1 keV in Table I of 2019Sa04 could be a misprint, as it seems low as compared to other |DE|g values. Evaluator assigns 0.5 keV 
$POL=-0.03 {I5}, P{-S}=-0.8 {I15}. DCO(D)=1.09 {I7}, R{-ADO}=1.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$ q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.084 {I11}, X(E0/E2)=0.031 {I4} (2005Ki02) 
E$a 2048.4-keV E0 transition has been observed (1981Pa10) with B(E0 to g.s.)/B(E2 to 1173)=0.028 {I5} from ce(K)(2048|g)/ce(K)(876|g)=0.084 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E average of 2103.78 {I25} ({+18}O,4n|g) and 2104.6 {I3} ({+62}Co |b{+-} decay (13.9-min)), 2104.5 {I3} in (|a,p|g). B(E2)(W.u.)>0.55 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$average of 29 in ({+18}O,4n|g) and 71 in (|a,p|g) 
MR -0.24 {I6} or -2.4 {I4}, ({+18}O,4n|g). |D|p=yes suggests smaller value more likely. 5- assignment defines the transition as E1+M2; |d=-0.24 {I6} gives B(M2)(W.u.)>20, compared with RUL=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$assignment of 5- defines the transition as E3 to give B(E3)(W.u.)>7.6|*10{+5}, compared with RUL=100; this transition may be suspect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=875.37 {I12}, |s=0.00173 {I25} (2007ChZX) 
$ (876|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.365 {I14}, A{-4}=+1.139 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (1718|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I12} 
$ For J(2891)=2, 1970Fa06 deduce |d(1718)=-4.1 {I+13-30} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=1885.0 {I4}, |s=0.00068 {I21} (2007ChZX) 
$ (1886|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=2084.6 {I4}, |s=0.00085 {I22} (2007ChZX) 
$ (2084|g+2097|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.154 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=2098.2 {I3}, |s=0.00170 {I25} (2007ChZX) 
$ (2084|g+2097|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.154 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ (2346|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I7} 
$ (2346|g)(1173|g)(|q)+(1221|g)(2301|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=1220.83 {I21}, |s=0.00076 {I17} (2007ChZX) 
M$99% Q if J(3523)=2+ (1970Fa06) 
$ (1221|g)(2301|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I14} 
$ (1221|g)(2301|g)(|q)+(2346|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: 3972.7 {I4}, |s=0.0022 {I4} (2007ChZX); intensity of this |g in 2007ChZX is much larger than expected when compared with I|g of 1970Fa06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=1850.9 {I3}, |s=0.00106 {I21} (2007ChZX); intensity of this |g in 2007ChZX is much larger than expected when compared with I|g of 1970Fa06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=1045.69 {I20}, |s=0.00061 {I13} (2007ChZX); when compared with data in 1970Fa06, the intensity of this |g in 2007ChZX is much larger than expected from I|g of 1970Fa06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=310.584 {I21}, |s=0.00562 {I11} (2007ChZX); when compared with data in 1970Fa06, the intensity of this |g in 2007ChZX is much too large to belong to {+62}Ni 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=3544.9 {I4}, |s=0.0010 {I3} (2007ChZX); intensity of this |g in 2007ChZX is much larger than expected when compared with I|g of 1970Fa06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Other: E|g=5594.07 {I21}, |s=0.0066 {I6} (2007ChZX); when compared with data in 1970Fa06, the intensity of this |g in 2007ChZX is much too large to belong to {+62}Ni 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g not reported by 1970Fa06; given as 7693 {I5} by 1967Ba79 
RI$estimated by evaluators from a comparison of various relevant I|g values given in 1975Wi06 and 1970Fa06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1970Fa06 compares with a value of 8302.5 {I17} from 1975Wi06 - latter results in a level at 2294 {I2}, which differs significantly from 2301.8 level in Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 9425 {I3} (1970Fa06), 9417 {I8} (1967Ba79) 
$ Other: E|g=9421.67 {I24}, |s=0.00245 {I25} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Evaluator sees no compelling reason to place this |g with the 3862 level (as advocated by 1974Mo09), particularly when data from {+61}Ni(n,|g) do not indicate such a branch. An 1816|g is observed in (n,|g) and identified with a 4151 level, while in {+59}Co(|a,p|g) an 1818|g is defined as depopulating a 4154 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$others: +1.7 {I+9-5} or +0.07 {I18} (1969Be48); +3.0 {I+7-20} (1976Ca31, |g|g(|q) in {+62}Cu |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+3.0 {I+7-20} from |g|g(|q) data (1976Ca31), uncertainty at 90% confidence level 
$(1129|g)(1173|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.26 {I12} (1976Ca31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$1102.5|g is an unresolved doublet. The second component, assigned to {+62}Ni, was stronger but could not be placed in the level scheme 
$Compiler's note: negative A{-4}, inconsistent with |DJ=1 transition, may be due to the second component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.140 {I+50-70}, q{-K}{+2}=0.22 {I7} 
$E0 transition matrix element=0.084 b {I+14-25} 
$2019Ev01 adopted weighted average of |d(E2/M1)=+3.1 {I1} from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g) in the present work, and |d(E2/M1)=+2.70 {I+38-28} from |g(|q) data in (n,n'|g) (2011Ch05). The second solution of |d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I1} from present |g(|q) data in (p,p'|g) is inconsistent with value from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g). Other: 1204.66 {I18} from ({+18}O,3n|g) 
M$O+Q from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g); M3 and E3 components ruled out by RUL; |D|p=yes based on L(d,p)=L(d,t)=4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 891.5 {I1} from ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g) and 891.70 {I16} from ({+18}O,3n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g); |D|p=(no) from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0086 {I+18-12} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=18.7 {I+38-26} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 630.1 {I1} from ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g) and 630.9 {I3} from ({+18}O,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g). 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g); |D|p=(no) from level scheme. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.128 {I+96-39} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=5.6|*10{+2} {I+42-17} exceeds RUL=300 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1521.9 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g) and 1522.63 {I20} from ({+18}O,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g). 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,2|a3n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1466.94 
$R{-Ac}=1.27 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1509.64 
$R{-Ac}=0.81 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=2057.2 
E$level-energy difference=2057.4 
$R{-Ac}=1.13 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1702.4 
E$level-energy difference=1702.6 
$R{-Ac}=1.72 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 2265.9 {I8} (1977Is01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.07 {I2} (1977Is01) and 0.079 {I8} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 2353.1 {I4} (1977Is01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.30 {I3} (1977Is01) and 0.354 {I35} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2540.9 {I4} (1977Is01) and 2540.44 {I5} (1992Ha21) 
RI$weighted average of 0.23 {I2} (1977Is01) and 0.285 {I28} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2696.8 {I8} (1977Is01) and 2695.92 {I5} (1992Ha21) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.11 {I2} (1977Is01) and 0.167 {I17} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 3237.4 {I24} (1977Is01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.01 {I1} (1977Is01) and 0.024 {I1} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 3128.5 {I24} (1977Is01) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.04 {I2} (1977Is01) and 0.090 {I5} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 3476.91 {I35} (1977Is01) and 3475.93 {I8} (1992Ha21) 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I1} (1977Is01) and 0.114 {I6} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3583.97 {I33} (1977Is01) and 3583.48 {I7} (1992Ha21) 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I1} (1977Is01) and 0.132 {I7} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 3652.1 {I7} (1977Is01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.10 {I1} (1977Is01) and 0.110 {I6} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 3740.3 {I7} (1977Is01) and 3738.94 {I7} (1992Ha21) 
RI$other: 0.11 {I2} (1977Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3900.0 {I12} (1977Is01) and 3899.05 {I9} (1992Ha21) 
RI$other: 0.03 {I1} (1977Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4055.7 {I12} (1977Is01) and 4054.45 {I8} (1992Ha21) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.04 {I1} (1977Is01) and 0.060 {I3} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4460.8 {I12} (1977Is01) and 4458.97 {I9} (1992Ha21) 
RI$other: 0.04 {I1} (1977Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 2525.8 {I14} with I|g=0.05 {I2} (1977Is01) 
$Placement from 1992Ha21; unplaced 1977Is01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 2784.0 {I6} (1977Is01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.12 {I2} (1977Is01) and 0.126 {I13} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3099.4 {I4} (1977Is01) and 3098.97 {I6} (1992Ha21) 
RI$weighted average of 0.48 {I6} (1977Is01) and 0.498 {I25} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3555.0 {I6} (1977Is01) and 3554.39 {I7} (1992Ha21) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.08 {I1} (1977Is01) and 0.119 {I6} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4142.5 {I4} (1977Is01) and 4141.94 {I7} (1992Ha21) 
RI$weighted average of 0.46 {I5} (1977Is01) and 0.516 {I26} (1992Ha21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 4485.71 {I34} (1977Is01) and 4484.78 {I8} (1992Ha21) 
RI$other: 0.36 {I3} (1977Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5514.64 {I32} (1977Is01), 5513.89 {I9} (1992Ha21), and 5514.2 {I6} (1972Ko15). 
RI$weighted average of 1.70 {I10} (1977Is01), 1.63 {I8} (1992Ha21). Others: 1.28 {I8} (1997Ve03) and 1.3 {I2} (1972Ko15) seem discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5837.03 {I24} (1977Is01), 5836.22 {I10} (1992Ha21), and 5836.1 {I6} (1972Ko15). 
RI$weighted average of 6.5 {I5} (1977Is01), 6.30 {I32} (1992Ha21), 6.86 {I17} (1997Ve03), 5.5 {I5} (1972Ko15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 6320.34 {I27} (1977Is01), 6319.48 {I11} (1992Ha21), and 6319.6 {I7} (1972Ko15). 
RI$others: 4.1 {I3} (1977Is01), 3.9 {I4} (1972Ko15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 6682.63 {I24} (1977Is01), 6681.88 {I12} (1992Ha21), 6682.7 {I7} (1972Ko15). 
RI$weighted average of 1.47 {I8} (1977Is01), 1.42 {I7} (1992Ha21), 1.50 {I6} (1997Ve03), 1.3 {I2} (1972Ko15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 6838.16 {I23} (1977Is01), 6837.40 {I12} (1992Ha21), and 6838.2 {I7} (1972Ko15). 
RI$unweighted average of 85 {I4} (1992Ha21), 86 {I6} (1977Is01), and 76 {I4} (1972Ko15), and 94.1 {I20} (1997Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1345.8 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s), 1345.77 {I6} from {+64}Cu |e decay (12.700 h), 1345.84 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 1346.0 {I1} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g), and 1345.8 {I1} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: 1345.1 {I2} from ({+70}Zn,X|g) 
M$from |DJ=2, Q from |g|g(|q) data in ({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g), and RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 930.8 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s), 930.8 {I1} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g), and 930.8 {I1} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s). Other: 100.0 {I23} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); (M1+E2) from level scheme. Other: |d(Q/D)|?-0.9 from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s). Other: 2277 {I2} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: <2.46 from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: 1264.0 {I2} from ({+70}Zn,X|g) 
M$|DJ=2, Q from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1521.6 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s), 1521.5 {I4} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 1521.5 {I2} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 695.7 {I3} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 695.5 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s). Other: 80 {I40} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1626.3 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 1626.4 {I4} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I40} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 100 {I60} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2972.0 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 2972.04 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 2973 {I1} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 60 {I20} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s), 70 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th, and 80 {I40} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1680.1 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay and 1680.1 {I2} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 877.2 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 877.15 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 58 {I9} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 73 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1808.0 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 1807.97 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s). Other: 75 {I16} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3153.7 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 3153.68 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 100 {I18} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1820.4 {I5} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 1819.9 {I2} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) 
RI$weighted average of 14 {I9} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 32 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 785.7 {I5} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 81 {I13} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 59 {I11} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: 2049.8 {I4} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I25} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); I|g(2050|g)/I|g(786|g)=40/60 in (p,p'|g) is discrepant. 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1187.02 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 1186.5 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1284.0 {I6} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 1283.3 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: 27 {I9} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2214.4 {I5} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 2213.7 {I2} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: 100 {I27} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3578.3 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay and 3578.32 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from (n,|g) E=th. Other: <43 from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$other: 2400 from (p,p'|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th (2020Ma37); E1+M2 disfavored by the large |d and RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 189.0 {I4} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 189.3 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g). Other: 100 {I17} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); M1 is most likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 583.4 {I6} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 33 {I8} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 36 {I6} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 99.6 {I6} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 100.0 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 4.2 {I14} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 4.8 {I13} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 452.9 {I6} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 453.3 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 11.1 {I14} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 6.1 {I13} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1239.0 {I3} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g), 1239.0 {I1} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g), and 1239.9 {I3} from ({+70}Zn,X|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 236.5 {I5} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 236.1 {I3} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 50 {I20} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 33 {I14} from ({+238}U{+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1474.8 {I5} with I|g=100 {I20} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); (E1) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 323.4 {I2} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); most likely M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay. 
$Poor-fit; level-energy difference=689.56. Note that a 688.9|g is placed from 4085 level in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 1114.6 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay 
RI$from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s). Other: 100 {I20} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2922.1 {I1} from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay (0.30 s) and 2922.07 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from (n,|g) E=th. Other: <21.7 from {+64}Co |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 359.4 {I2} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D or D+Q with |DJ=1 from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); M1 is most likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1280.4 {I5} from {+208}Pb({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) and 1280.0 {I2} from {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g) 
M$D or D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+64}Ni,{+64}Ni'|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. A transition to 1346 level is mentioned but its energy is not given by 2020Ma37. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$2020Ma37 mention a 702|g-3154|g correlation cascade from a (n,|g) E=th experiment at ILL, which has not been published 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1974HeYW; |D(E|g)=0.16 keV quoted in 2004BeZR (see evaluation of {+64}Cu decay) seems a misprint. 
RI$weighted average of 0.472 {I10} (2018Ya06), 0.469 {I4} (2017Pi09), 0.476 {I6}, 0.472 {I12} and 0.481 {I17} in 2012Be24, 0.474 {I5} (2010Wa46), 0.471 {I11} (1983Ch47), and 0.487 {I20} (1986Ka03). Other: 0.54 {I3} from 2007Qa02 is discrepant 
M$from the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(1239|g)(1346|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I1} 
$(1239|g)(1264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(1475|g)(1346|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I10} 
$(1475|g)(1264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(323|g)(1264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} 
$(323|g)(1346|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(359|g)(1346|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} 
$(359|g)(323|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2}; 323|g gating transition is |DJ=1, dipole or D+Q 
$(359|g)(1264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1280|g)(1264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I10} 
$(1280|g)(359|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I6}; 359|g gating transition is |DJ=1, dipole or D+Q 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+0.05 eb {I2} 
$M1 matrix element=-0.003 |m{-N}{+1/2} {I+41-33} 
$Uncertainty in B(M1) from Table V in 2022Li54; uncertainty listed as 0.0003854 in Table II seems a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-5} e{+2}fm{+2})=8.4 {I12}, |DB(E1) (syst)=8, B(M1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-3} |m{+2}{-N})=7.5 {I11}, |DB(M1) (syst)=8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-5} e{+2}fm{+2})=12.1 {I14}, |DB(E1) (syst)=12, B(M1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-3} |m{+2}{-N})=10.9 {I12}, |DB(M1) (syst)=11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-5} e{+2}fm{+2})=24.1 {I34}, |DB(E1) (syst)=24, B(M1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-3} |m{+2}{-N})=21.7 {I30}, |DB(M1) (syst)=22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-5} e{+2}fm{+2})=42 {I3}, |DB(E1) (syst)=4, B(M1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-3} |m{+2}{-N})=37.7 {I29}, |DB(M1) (syst)=38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-5} e{+2}fm{+2})=21.7 {I41}, |DB(E1) (syst)=22, B(M1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-3} |m{+2}{-N})=19.6 {I37}, |DB(M1) (syst)=20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-5} e{+2}fm{+2})=23.2 {I66}, |DB(E1) (syst)=23, B(M1)|*|G{-0}/|G (10{+-3} |m{+2}{-N})=20.8 {I59}, |DB(M1) (syst)=21 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M from |a|?5 in (n,|g) mult=E1+M2 or M1+E2 with large |d or E2+M3 with small |d. RUL rules out M2 and known J|p change rules out M1. Thus mult=(E2) or (E2+M3) with |d<1|*10{+-4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC$ Theoretical value calculated using the BrIcc code from www.nndc.bnl.gov. 
RI$ 10 {I3} from {+65}Fe-->{+65}Co-->{+65}Ni decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$not given by 2020Po12, as this |g is not seen in |g|g-coin. From intensity balance at the 63.46 level, compiler obtains 367 {I60} relative units of transition intensity, from which, I|g=87 {I14} relative to 100 for 310.45|g, using |a(theory)=3.23 for mult=E2 
M$from {+65}Ni Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Aug 2009 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from (5406|g)(629|g)(|q), assuming |d(M2/E1)<0.05 for 5406|g. Other solution of -1.95 {I6} is rejected based on unrealistic B(E2)(W.u.) |? 480, deduced from mean lifetime t|?0.7 ps 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from (5406|g)(692|g)(|q), assuming |d(M2/E1)<0.05 for 5406|g. Other solution of -5.3 {I4} is rejected based on large B(E2)(W.u.) |? 467, deduced from mean lifetime t|?0.7 ps, and assumed low collectivity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$(1107.27|g)(310.45|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.176 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I5}. Other solution of +1.66 {I2} is rejected based on large B(E2)(W.u.)>72, deduced from mean lifetime |t<300 fs; authors assume low collectivity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Other solution for |d is +2.1 {I2} 
$(2589.0|g)[2817.8|g](629.00|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$(3773.9|g)[2013.66|g](310.45|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} 
$(3773.9|g)[1631.97|g](629.00|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$(3951.5|g)[1836.4|g](310.45|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} 
$(3951.5|g)[1454.5|g](629.00|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I5} assumed by authors 
$(5405.6|g)(629.00|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.213 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} 
$(5405.6|g)(692.42|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.066 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I5} assumed by authors 
$(5787.7|g)(310.45|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.171 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$not given by 2020Po12, as this |g is not seen in |g|g-coincidence From I|g(6034.8)/I|g(5787.7)=66.5 {I35}/17.7 {I9} in 1977Is01: Z. Physik A281, 365, and I|g(5787.7)=86 {I12} in 2020Po12, compiler deduces expected relative I|g(6034.8)=323 {I52}, which makes it the most intense |g ray in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(356|g)(1425|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1} 
$(356|g)(1760|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(354|g)(1946|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I8}. 1946|g gating transition is |DJ=1, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(490|g)(1086|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1}. 1086|g gating transition is |DJ=1, dipole 
$(490|g)(1760|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1} 
$(490|g)(1425|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.00 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1086|g)(1425|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2} 
$(1086|g)(1760|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(1405|g)(1086|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I1}. 1086|g gating transition is |DJ=1, dipole 
$(1405|g)(1425|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
M$from comparison of measured T{-1/2} with Weisskopf estimate (1998Gr14). Similar isomeric transition in {+65}Fe 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
M from comparison of measured T{-1/2} with Weisskopf estimate (1998Gr14). Similar isomeric transition in {+65}Fe 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$ from (1695|g)(1210|g)(|q), intensity ratio=1.8 {I3} for 33|' and 77|' 
MR$ large mixing ratio from |g|g(|q) data, consistent with shell-model predictions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$The source of the observed 511|g's in {+68}Co |b decay (1.6 s) may be from (e{++},e{+-}) from the 2512 state to the 0+ g.s.; however, no 1511|g-511|g coincidences were observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$stretched quadrupole from |g-ray anisotropy in {+198}Pt({+70}Zn,X|g); M2 is excluded by comparison to RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$The source of the observed 511|g's (see above) may be from an E0 transition from the 2512 state to the 0+ g.s.; however, no 1511|g-511|g coincidences were observed. 
$|r{+2}>0.24 if all the I|g(511|g) originates from the 2512 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$From coincidence and T{-1/2} measurements, this transition is a doublet also observed in {+68}Co |b{+-} decay (0.20 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$From coincidence and T{-1/2} measurements, this transition is a doublet also observed in {+68}Co |b{+-} decay (1.6 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$Statistics insufficient to determine T{-1/2}; placement by 2000Mu10 is based on the data of 2000Is01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI$based on non-observation of a 1515|g in coincidence with the 1604 E0 transition. 
$|r{+2}(E0) < 0.0258 (2016Cr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI$from lack of 1515-511 coincidence, where 511 would be assumed to originate from pair-production decay of the 2511 transtion. 
$|r{+2}(E0) < 0.0050 (2016Cr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ from 2-neutron knockout reaction. Other: 58 {I10} from deep inelastic scattering (2013Re18). Combining with previous value from |b decay, authors give average I|g=43 {I3} 
$ B(E2)(710|g)/B(E2)(2743|g)=310 {I+100-99} from 2-neutron knockout reaction, 346 {I+117-225} from deep inelastic scattering (2013Re18). Combining with previous value from |b decay, 2013Re18 give average ratio of 259 {I+73-161} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Placement of this |g ray is established in this work. Earlier, in |b decay study, this |g was tentatively placed from a 3988 level to 2849, 5- level 
RI$ from 2-neutron knockout reaction. Other: 47 {I10} from deep inelastic scattering (2013Re18). Combining with previous value from |b decay, authors give average I|g=44 {I3} 
$ B(E2)(1139|g)/B(E2)(2743|g)=41 {I5} from 2-neutron knockout reaction, 38 {I9} from deep inelastic scattering (2013Re18). Combining with previous value from |b decay, 2013Re18 give average ratio of 36 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.0076 {I4} (2014Su05) 
E,M$from 2014Su05. In |g-ray spectrum, peak is measured at 1604 keV {I9}, which corresponds to simultaneous detection of conversion electrons from 0+ state and 8.3-keV x-ray due to ce process. A more precise energy of the transition is obtained from the level scheme. A 570 keV {I13} peak seen in |g-ray spectrum is not a |g ray but it is due to the simultaneous detection of electron and positron created by the internal pair-production of the 1605-keV E0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unplaced transition in {+70}Co |b{+-} decay, placement from {+9}Be({+72}Ni,{+70}Ni|g),({+73}Cu,{+70}Ni|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$a 916|g with I|g=59 {I19} was placed from a 3146-keV level by 2003Sa40,2003GrZZ; transition not observed by 2000Mu10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$not observed by 2003Sa40, attributed to a much weaker population of this isomer in their reaction 
RI$other: 27 {I4} (2000Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from {+70}Co |b{+-} decay (0.47 s) (2000Mu10). A 1259-keV transition is self-coincident and proposed to correspond to the 1259.6- and 1256.8-keV pair identified in {+70}Co |b{+-} decay (0.47 s). 
M$2015Ch25 suggest either D or Q for the multipolarity of the 1256.8|g based on the prompt character of the decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$a weak 442|g is observed only in |g|g-coin data and may correspond to the 448-keV transition from 6+ yrast level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.3 {I2} in 1n knockout and 0.5 {I2} in 2p knockout. The intensity for 1n and 2p knockout is below detection sensitivity and was estimated using branching ratio measured in 1p knockout 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1.7 {I3} in 1n knockout and 1.0 {I6} in 2p knockout 
RI$differences in intensity ratio with 640|g are due to self-coincident doublet and possible lifetime effects. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1.5 {I4} in 1n knockout and 0.6 {I2} in 2p knockout The intensity for 1p and 2p knockout was estimated using branching ratio from ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$3.9 {I6} in 1n knockout and 1.6 {I5} in 2p knockout 
RI$splitting between 676|g-682|g doublet is determined using add-back coincidences in 1p knockout, which was then applied to 2p knockout 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$54 {I10} (2004Sa59) 
E$placement proposed from 253 or 1308 level in 2004Sa59, which is inconsistent with placement from 1065 level in more recent study by 2012Ra10, based on observed |g-ray intensities of the 252.6|g and 812.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$100 (2004Sa59) 
E$placement proposed from 1027 or 1055 level in 2004Sa59, which is inconsistent with placement from 1065 level in more recent study by 2012Ra10, based on observed |g-ray intensities of the 252.6|g and 812.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 2014Ra20. Other: 281 (2016Mo07) 
$I|g=13 {I3} (2014Ra20), relative to 100 for 1095.1|g in {+72}Ni from {+72}Co |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ relative to 100 for 239.2|g from {+73}Co |b{+-} decay 
E$ uncertainty of 6 keV in table II of 2012Ra10 is probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.2 {I3} (2001Ru02) 
$ DCO=0.9 3 (1999Ru01), 0.9 3 (2002Ru09) 
$ ^R(asymmetry)=1.39 19 (1999Ru01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.02 {I17} for 1509+1519 (2001Ru02); R(asymmetry)=1.21 {I12} (1999Ru01) 
$DCO=0.9 4 (2002Ru09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.96 {I18} (2002Ru09) 
$DCO=0.95 13 (2001Ru02), DCO=0.90 24 (1999Ru01) 
$ ^R(asymmetry)=1.13 12 (1999Ru01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.02 {I17} for 1509+1519 (2001Ru02); ; R(asymmetry)=1.2 {I3} (1999Ru01) 
$DCO=1.0 4 (2002Ru09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.07 {I22} (2001Ru02) 
$ DCO=1.13 19 (1999Ru01), 0.89 15 (2002Ru09) 
$ ^R(asymmetry)=1.25 11 (1999Ru01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.23 {I21} (2002Ru09); R(asymmetry)=1.41 {I14} (1999Ru01) 
$ DCO=0.92 12 (2001Ru02) 
$ DCO=0.98 12 (1999Ru01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.08 {I16} (2001Ru02) 
$ DCO=1.04 22 (1999Ru01), 0.89 16 (2002Ru09) 
$ ^R(asymmetry)=1.43 16 (1999Ru01) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$DCO=1.16 {I20} (2002Ru09) 
$DCO=1.11 26 (2001Ru02) 
$ DCO=1.2 4 (1999Ru01) 
$ ^R(asymmetry)=1.44 16 (1999Ru01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ |G{-|g}/(|G{-p}+|G{-|g})=0.38 {I11} (2003Ha43) 
E$ 3275 in text section of 2003Ha43 seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in ({+3}He,pn|g). 
MR <0.9 from |a(K)exp in ({+3}He,pn|g); <0.37 is expected from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E Unweighted average from |e decay, (p,|g), ({+3}He,pn|g), ({+3}He,d|g), and ({+28}Si,2|ap|g). 
M,MR Mult from ({+3}He,pn|g). -0.21 {I2} or -1.75 {I12} from (p,|g); |d<0.7 from |a(K)exp in ({+3}He,pn|g). Other: -0.8 {I+5-9} from ({+3}He,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M M1,E2 from ({+3}He,pn|g); D(+Q) from (p,|g). 
MR weighted average of -0.02 {I6} in ({+3}He,pn|g) and +0.10 {I12} in (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 75 in ({+3}He,d|g), 85 in ({+3}He,pn|g). 
M,MR Mult from ({+3}He,pn|g). |d(Q,O)=-0.03 {I4} in (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E weighted average from ({+3}He,pn|g) and (p,|g). 
MR if mult=E1+M2, |d implies T{-1/2}>40 ps based on RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E weighted average from ({+3}He,d|g) and (p,|g). 
Other I|g: 104 in ({+3}He,d|g), |?118 in ({+3}He,pn|g). 
M |D|p=yes from level scheme; however, |d(E1,M2)<0.063 is expected from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E reported only in a ({+3}He,pn|g) study in which the 1409|g and 2324|g, known to de-excite the 2324 level, were absent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E Unweighted average of data from ({+3}He,pn|g) and ({+28}Si,2|ap|g). 
M from ({+3}He,pn|g). 
MR weighted average of +0.35 {I10} in (p,|g) and +0.31 {I5} in ({+3}He,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=AP
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
RI Other: 38.6 {I18} ({+28}Si,2|ap|g) 
M D+Q in ({+28}Si,2|ap|g), D(+Q) in ({+3}He,pn|g) and (p,|g). 
MR Wt. ave. of -0.07 {I+5-6} in ({+3}He,pn|g), +0.011 {I18} in (p,|g), and +0.03 {I1} ({+28}Si,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR Mult from ({+3}He,pn|g). |d from wt. ave. of +0.15 {I+4-5} ({+28}Si,2|ap|g) and +0.09 {I5} ({+3}He,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D(+Q) in ({+3}He,d|g) 
MR from ({+3}He,d|g). 
B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) smaller than typical in this mass region. 
$(BE1W=2.7E-5 16, BM2W<0.9 WOULD, HOWEVER, BE TYPICAL). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E|g=2823 {I2} in ({+3}He,pn|g) may be for this transition. 
M D(+Q) in ({+3}He,d|g) 
RI,MR from ({+3}He,d|g). |d=-0.06 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI note that I(2992|g)/I(3906|g)=1.00 {I3} in (p,|g) cf. 0.31 {I8} here. 
M From ({+3}He,d|g) 
MR |d(D,Q)=-0.02 {I29} in ({+3}He,d|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR from ({+3}He,pn|g). |d is wt. ave. of +0.19 {I4} ({+28}Si,2|ap|g) and +0.07 {I5} ({+3}He,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI after correction for I(423|g) from daughter ({+59}Cu) |e decay. Existence of transition uncertain. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ho34. 
MR -0.18 {I4} or -1.8 {I4} (1970Ho34), -0.19 {I3} or -1.90 {I15} (1975Tr05), -0.27 {I5} or -1.50 {I26} (1968Tr04), -0.27 {I9} or -1.42 {I31} (1968Tr04). Weighted average: -0.21 {I2} or -1.75 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ho34. 
MR -0.5 {I2} or -1.1 {I2} (1970Ho34), -0.32 {I4} or -1.43 {I15} (1975Tr05), -1.30 {I15} (1968Tr04); weighted average is -0.33 {I4} or -1.23 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ho34. 
M from 1975Tr05. 
|d(D,Q)=-0.05 {I5} or +4.7 {I10} (1975Tr05), +0.14 {I14} or -2.9 {I8} (1968Tr04). Weighted average=-0.03 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E 2493.6 {I10} (1970Ho34). 
M from 1968Tr04. 
MR |d(D,Q)=+0.11 {I11} (1968Tr04); 0.00 {I15} or >+2 (1975Tr05) is attributed by evaluator to this transition, based on branching in 1975Tr05 and 1985Di05 (indicated as transition to 3026 level, instead, in table 2 of 1975Tr05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 2829.3 {I10} (1970Ho34). 
MR weighted average of +0.08 {I4} (1968Tr04), +0.06 {I2} (1970Ho34), +0.12 {I5} (1975Tr05) (evaluator assumes sign of |d misprinted in 1975Tr05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 3903.2 {I10} (1970Ho34). 
MR weighted average of +0.25 {I8} (1975Tr05), +0.27 {I8} (1970Ho34), +0.20 {I4} (1968Tr04); evaluator assumes sign(|d) misprinted in 1975Tr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 4326.6 {I10} (1970Ho34). 
M A{-2}=-0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=0.42 {I3} (1994Ho31). 
MR +0.04 {I4} or -1.8 {I7} (1985Di05), +0.06 {I1} or -2.0 {I1} (1970Ho34), -0.05 {I5} or -1.96 {I30} (1975Tr05), +0.07 {I1} or -2.05 {I9} (1968Tr04). Weighted average is +0.06 {I1} or -2.02 {I7}. Other |d: +0.010 {I+5-15} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E 4819.1 {I5} (1985Ti04; recoil corrected), 4816.8 {I10} (1970Ho34); weighted average=4818.6 {I9}. 
M A{-2}=+0.47 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=1.52 {I10} (1994Ho31). 
MR +0.05 {I5} or +3.3 {I7} (1985Di05), +0.06 {I2} or +3.2 {I5} (1970Ho34), +0.04 {I5} or +3.7 {I7} (1975Tr05); weighted average is +0.056 {I17} or +3.4 {I4}. Other |d: -0.07 {I3} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E,M,MR from 1977Co03. E(level)=5218.6 {I5} from adopted E(1399 level) and E|g. 
MR other: -0.01 {I3} from 3820|g(|q) (1977Co03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E 5230.1 {I10} (1970Ho34), 5231.4 {I5} (1985Ti04); weighted average= 5231.1 {I5} 
M A{-2}=+0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1985Di05); A{-2}=-0.007 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.026 {I27} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 1985Ti04 report E|g=5271.0 {I7}; relationship to 5264|g of 1985Di05 is unclear. 
MR from 1975Tr05; +2.3 {I6} also possible. Other: +0.25 (1983Si24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E E|g=5312.2 {I8} from 1985Ti04 not adopted; source of discrepancy not understood, but I|g from 1985Ti04 is too high, suggesting unresolved impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E 5522.3 {I4} (1985Ti04). 
M A{-2}=-0.51 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I2} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.04 {I2} if J=5/2 (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 5550.0 {I6} (1985Ti04). 
M W(0|')/W(90|')=1.00 {I9} (1994Ho31). 
MR -0.19 {I3} from 1994Ho31 if J(5550 level)=5/2. |d=-0.35 {I8} (1983Si24) assumes J(5550 level)=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Misprint in table 1 of 1975Tr05; based on table 2, resonance feeds 1399 level, not 1865 level. |d from 1975Tr05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 1975Tr05 assign branch to 2324 level instead of 2318 level so their |g(|q) analysis is incorrect. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=+0.03 {I5} (1985Di05), -0.02 {I3} (1975Tr05); weighted average is -0.01 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1985Ti04. 
M A{-2}=+0.40 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I9} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=-0.45 {I9} (1983Si24) if J(5881 level)=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.43 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=2.04 {I12} (1994Ho31). 
MR 1994Ho31 report +0.06 {I4}, but assumed a 5/2 to 5/2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.74 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I19} (1985Di05). 
Other |d: -0.7 {I+4-6} (1983Si24); may be for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.24 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I16} (1985Di05). 
Other |d: -0.1 {I+3-8} (1983Si24); may be for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.61 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I16} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.05 {I8} or -1.5 {I3}. Other: -0.12 {I9} (1983Si24); may be for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
E 6041.4 {I9} for probable doublet (1985Ti04). 
M A{-2}=+0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.17 {I4} or <-10. Other: -0.63 {I6} (1983Si24); may be for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.24 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I24} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.4 {I2} or <-3 (1985Di05). Other: +0.06 {I11} (1983Si24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.29 {I4} or <-14. Other: -0.76 -13+8 (1983Si24). 
E 6091.8 {I7} (1985Ti04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M,MR from 1983Si24; |d(D,Q)=-0.02 {I+9-4} for J(6201)=3/2. Were the 2839 resonance not resolved in 1983Si24, it would contribute to this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.08 {I5} from 1983Si24 for J(6201)=3/2. Were the 2831 resonance not resolved in 1983Si24, it would contribute to this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E 6304.1 {I10} (1985Ti04). 
M,MR |d=-0.19 {I5} from 1983Si24 assuming J(res)=3/2. |d=-16 -7+54 also possible (1979Kr20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M from 1983Si24. W(0|')/W(90|')=0.78 {I11} (1994Ho31). 
MR unweighted average of +0.17 {I13} (1983Si24) and +0.05 {I7} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M from 1983Si24. W(0|')/W(90|')=0.38 {I4} (1994Ho31). 
MR Unweighted average of -0.15 {I4} (1983Si24) and +0.015 {I+30-4} (1994Ho31) is -0.07 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 6365.5 {I9} (1985Ti04). 
M from 1983Si24. W(0|')/W(90|')=1.49 {I12} (1994Ho31). 
MR unweighted average of-0.21 {I5} (1983Si24) and -0.07 {I+3-4} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E|g=6410.4 {I10} (1985Ti04); may not be resolved from 3041 resonance. 
MR -0.61 {I9} if J(6410 level)=3/2 (1983Si24) and resonance is not complex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ho31; however, see comment on 6419|g. 
W(0|')/W(90|')=0.98 {I18} (1994Ho31). 
M,MR from 1983Si24. 1994Ho31 report +0.07 {I11}, but assumed a 3/2 to 5/2 transition to an otherwise unknown 2337 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ho31; however, see comment on 6419|g. 
W(0|')/W(90|')=1.00 {I17} (1994Ho31). 
M,MR from 1983Si24. 1994Ho31 report +0.09 {I11}, but assumed a 3/2 to 5/2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M W(0|')/W(90|')=1.11 {I17} (1994Ho31). 
RI,M from 1994Ho31, but see comment on 6419|g. |d is weighted average of -0.12 {I+18-21} (1983Si24) and -0.16 {I+11-12} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ho31; however, see comment on 6419|g. 
M W(0|')/W(90|')=0.51 {I10} (1994Ho31). 
MR weighted average of +0.02 {I7} (1983Si24) and +0.06 {I+5-6} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ho31. Transition shown as tentative because it is not reported in other studies, whereas a g.s. transition is known from the 3047-keV resonance (9 keV below this one). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E resonances 7 keV above and below may not be resolved. The g.s. branch from the upper resonance is weak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI omitted in error from table iii of 1985Di05; I|g inferred from (100%- |S(%I|g from resonance)). Placement based on table v of 1985Di05. 
M A{-2}=+0.05 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I15} (1985Di05). 
MR if J(4301 level)=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.07 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I14} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.2 {I2} if J=5/2, -0.2 {I1} or -4 {I2} if J=7/2 for 3574 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.3 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.1 {I3} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.5 {I2} or <-2.6 if J(3615 level)=3/2; +0.1 {I2} or <-3 if J(3615 level)=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.48 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I14} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=-0.5 {I1} or <-10 if J(3130 level)=1/2; 0.0 {I1} or <-3 if J(3130 level)=3/2; and -0.9 {I4}, <-4.7 if J(3130 level)=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.92 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I16} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.3 {I1} or -0.9 {I1} if J(2318 level)=1/2; +1.3 {I4} if J(2318 level)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.02 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I19} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=+0.1 {I1} and -0.6 {I2} or +3.7 {I20} for J(3930 level)=5/2 and 7/2, respectively (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.26 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I10} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=+0.04 {I5} and -0.7 {I2} for J(3930 level)=5/2 and 7/2, respectively (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.05 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I10} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=+0.1 {I1} and -0.03 {I8} for J(3930 level)=5/2 and 9/2, respectively (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.31 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I27} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=0.0 {I2} and <-0.5 for J(3930 level)=5/2 and 7/2, respectively (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=1.2 {I4} (1994Ho31). 
MR 1994Ho31 report |d=+0.02 {I+11-13}, but this assumes J(3309)=5/2 rather than 7/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.42 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=0.35 {I13} (1994Ho31). 
Other |d: -0.10 {I+7-9} (1994Ho31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.45 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I8} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=1.11 {I13} (1994Ho31). 
|d(D,Q)=-0.03 {I5} (1985Di05). |d=+0.20 {I4} (1994Ho31) probably results from analysis of 3784|g+3777|g doublet assuming a 7/2 to 5/2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=2.0 {I4} (1994Ho31). 
Other |d: +0.05 {I+21-16} (1994Ho31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.40 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (1985Di05); W(0|')/W(90|')=1.3 {I4} (1994Ho31). 
MR -0.1 {I1} (1985Di05). 1994Ho31 report +0.27 {I+9-10} but their analysis assumed J(1399)=5/2 instead of 7/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E 6626.3 {I7} (1985Ti04). 
M A{-2}=+0.37 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.03 {I3} or >-3.6. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 6708.2 {I7} (1985Ti04). 
M A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.02 {I3} or -4 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E if 6749 level feeds 2324 level as in table iii of 1985Di05; E|g=3007 if it feeds 3742 level, as in table v of 1985Di05. 
M A{-2}=-0.57 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I26} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.04 {I13} or -1.8 {I4} if J=3/2 level is fed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E 6842.3 {I7} (1985Ti04). 
M A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.4 {I1} or -7 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.42 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (1985Di05). 
MR weighted average of -0.07 {I5} (1985Di05), -0.012 {I28} (from +0.016 to -0.04 - 1975Co21), and -0.06 {I+6-5} (1977Ho29, table ii; sign differs in text). Other: 1982Sz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.24 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I13} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=-0.06 {I8} (1985Di05), +0.018 to -0.026 (1975Co21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.12 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=-0.05 {I7} (1985Di05), -0.01 {I2} (1975Co21), -0.07 {I+10-8} (1977Ho29). Weighted average=-0.02 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.32 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I8} (1985Di05). 
MR$From +0.039 to +0.008 (1975Co21); Other: +0.04 {I6} (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1985Di05). 
|d(D,Q)=-0.30 {I5} or <-10 (1985Di05) if J{-f}=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ho31. 
M,MR W(0|')/W(90|')=1.6 {I4} (1994Ho31). Authors report |d(D,Q)=-0.13 {I+17-15} but their analysis assumed a 5/2 to 5/2 transition (not 5/2 to 7/2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
I(4371|g):I(7299|g)=10.3:52.2 in 1994Ho31; |g not observed in 1985Di05 but should have been. 
M,MR +0.17 {i13} from 1994Ho31, if J(7299)=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
I(4590|g):I(7299|g)=8.7:52.2 in 1994Ho31; |g not observed in 1985Di05 but should have been. 
M,MR -0.16 {I+22-26} from 1994Ho31, if J(7299)=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI I(5900|g):I(7299|g)=4:52.2 in 1994Ho31; |g not observed in 1985Di05 but should have been. 
M,MR W(0|')/W(90|')=0.66 {I27} (1994Ho31). Authors report |d(D,Q)=+0.13 {I+24-8} if J(7299)=3/2, but assume J=5/2 (instead of J=7/2) for the final level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 52.2 (1994Ho31). 
M,MR -0.23 {I+3-2} from 1994Ho31, if J(7299)=3/2. A{-2}=+0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} 
MR$-0.21 {I5} or >+10 for J(7299)=3/2 (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Mult from 1977Ho29. |d is weighted average +0.1 {I1} (1985Di05) and 0.14 {I6} (1977Ho29). A{-2}=+0.57 {I6}, A{-4}=0.00 {I8} (1985Di05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.59 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.09 {I2} if J(8077 level)=5/2; -1.0 {I2} or -1.7 {I3} if J=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.56 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.07 {I3} if J(8223 level)=5/2; -0.9 {I2} or -1.8 {I3} if J=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.43 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (1985Di05). 
MR -0.02 {I3} if J(8259 level)=5/2; -0.65 {I5} or -3.1 {I4} if J=3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=11|*10{+-5} {I2} 
A{-2}=+0.164 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.021 {I9}. 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp, Q from |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI E|g=465.3 {I2} is 4|s low and branching is high cf. (p,|g) and ({+3}He,d|g). I|g taken from coin spectrum, so 465|g from {+59}Ni should not contribute. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=9|*10{+-5} {I3} 
A{-2}=+0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I3}. 
M M1,E2 from |a(K)exp; |DJ=2 from |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M from adopted J|p's. 
MR from T{-1/2} and assumed upper limit of B(E2)(W.u.)=300. Other: -0.17 {I+5-1} from |g(|q) in {+58}Ni(|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR see adopted levels, gammas. This value is consistent with the upper limit |a(exp)<1.9 from I(|g{+|+})/I(|g) (1969Ho01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.05 {I3} 
M$|DJ=0 transition 
E$doublet structure indicated in table I of 2004Iz01; but the other component is not identified either in {+60}Cu or in any of the other 7 nuclides listed in table I of 2004Iz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$0.04 from theoretical estimate by 1972Ca20 adopted by 1973Sa19 in (|a,p|g), but this value gives B(E2)(W.u.)=2500 {I400}, much larger than RUL of 200; the latter value limits |d to <0.004 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g to (7/2+,9/2+) level at 3277 keV from 6627, 1/2- level. Either this |g is questionable or there are two separate levels near 3277 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g to (7/2,9/2) level at 3790 keV from 6802, 1/2+ level. Either this |g is questionable or there are two separate levels near 3790 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g to (7/2,9/2) level at 3790 keV from 7107, (1/2+) level. Either this |g is questionable or there are two separate levels near 3790 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g to (7/2+,9/2+) level at 3277 keV from 7107, (1/2+) level. Either this |g is questionable or there are two separate levels near 3277 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ this |g is placed from 3970 level in Adopted Gammas based on other in-beam studies, thus the placement is questionable here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$assigned by the evaluators, consistent with DCO ratio. Mult=E2/M1 in table 2 of 2008An06 seems a misprint since it is inconsistent with J|p values of levelS involved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$1.9 {I13} in ({+16}O,|apn|g) 
M based on branching of 2293.7 level and T{-1/2}, see {+60}Ni(|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.52 {I8}, K/LM=8.0 {I15} (1954Nu27); L1/(L2+L3)>10 (1967An01) 
M must be dipole from K/LM ratio; |a(K) and L subshell ratio establish M1 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0023 {I2} 
M assigned pure E2 by 1967An01, although |a(K)exp falls between M1 and E2 values of |a(K). Based on T{-1/2}=0.15 ps {I+28-8} measured in {+62}Ni(p,n|g) studies, pure E2 would lead to B(E2)(W.u.)=2070, which is unreasonably large. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00058 {I4} 
M also from 1967An01, since 637 level is populated by an allowed transition from 0+ parent and I|g deduced from I|e with theoretical M1 |a agrees with direct measurements of I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$mult=Q from |g(|q). Based on branching of 2296 level (1977Ch31) and T{-1/2} (1977Ch04), B(E2)(W.u.)=0.00115 or B(M2)(W.u.)=0.0587; 1977Ch31 suggest that the former is unlikely, and assign mult=M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I4} for a multiplet; includes 1332|g from {+60}Ni 
M probably quadrupole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E given as 472 by 1975SeZF 
MR 0.00 {I5} if J|p(698)=2+; -0.60 {I10} if J|p(698)=3+ (1970Da15); +0.035 or -7.12 if J(698)=2; -0.532 if J(698)=3 (1984Ch25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR -0.06 {I5} if J|p(698)=2+; +0.35 {I4} if J|p(698)=3+ (1970Da15); -0.07 or +2.48 if J(698)=2; +0.344 if J(698)=3 (1984Ch25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR -0.70 {I7} if J|p(698)=2+; +0.04 {I3} if J|p(698)=3+ (1970Da15); -0.7 or -8.14 if J(698)=2; +0.035 if J(698)=3 (1984Ch25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Neither evidence for nor against 1142 level with a g.s. branch. 1977Ch04 found a |g ray of appropriate energy in coincidence with the 385|g, but their studies do not rule out a g.s. transition from the 1142 level. The 1142 level does not appear to be excited in |e+|b{++} decay of {+62}Zn. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 669.64 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 669.4 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 668.5 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 669.6 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 669.6 {I1} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M$M1 from ce data in {+63}Zn |e decay; E2 component from Coulomb excitation 
MR$deduced from adopted B(E2)|^=0.0116 {I6} and T{-1/2}=0.200 ps {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 962.07 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 962.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 961.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a2pn|g), 961.8 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 962.1 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 962.1 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 962.0 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. Others: -0.47 {I+4-9} from (|a,p|g), -0.3 {I3} from (|a,pn|g); 0.51 {I4} from adopted B(E2)|^=0.0355 {I17} and adopted T{-1/2}=0.59 ps {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 365.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 364.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 364.9 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 364.9 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 364.7 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 365.2 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 20.8 {I13} from (|a,p|g), 19.3 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 18.8 {I5} from (p,p'|g), and 20.2 {I6} from Coulomb excitation. Others: 18 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 22.2 {I33} from (n,n'|g), and 23.5 {I25} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. Other |d values: -0.10 {I+3-5} in (p,p'|g), -0.18 {I+8-10} in (|a,p|g), -0.25 {I30} in (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1326.99 {I11} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 1327.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1326.7 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1326.6 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 1327.0 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), and 1327.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g). Other: 1327.0 {I4} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100.0 {I13} from (|a,p|g), 100.0 {I33} from (n,n'|g), 100.0 {I5} from (p,p'|g), 100.0 {I25} from (d,{+3}He|g), and 100.0 {I10} from Coulomb excitation. 
M$Q from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,|ap|g) and ({+18}O,|ap2n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: Q(+M3) with |d=-0.017 {I52} from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 449.93 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 448.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 449.7 {I5} from ({+18}O,|a2pn|g), 450.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 449.7 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$weighted average of 31.1 {I22} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 28.8 {I17} from (|a,p|g), 30.4 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 30.8 {I9} from (n,n'|g), 30.5 {I14} from (p,p'|g). Others: 56 {I6} from (d,{+3}He|g), and 24.4 {I11} from Coulomb excitation are discrepant. 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from Coulomb excitation; E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. Other |d values: +0.09 {I+49-23} in (p,p'|g), +0.11 {I+25-18} in (|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 742.0 {I15} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.1 {I11} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 9.1 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 8.0 {I4} from (p,p'|g), and 5.9 {I11} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 13.7 {I14} from (|a,p|g) and 17 {I6} from (n,n'|g) seem discrepant. Unweighted average of all is 10.5 {I17}. 
M$Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g) and (p,p'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1412.07 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 1410.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1412.3 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1411.8 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 1412.1 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 1412.2 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. Others: 100 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I6} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 100.0 {I24} from (|a,p|g), 100.0 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 100 {I4} from (n,n'|g), 100.0 {I17} from (p,p'|g), and 100 {I6} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$weighted average of +0.76 {I7} from Coulomb excitation, +0.61 {I+9-8} from (|a,p|g), +0.62 {I+5-7} from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 584.85 {I15} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 585.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 24 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 24.5 {I21} from (|a,p|g), 28.2 {I5} from (p,|g):E=res, 21.1 {I9} from (n,n'|g), 22.1 {I5} from (p,p'|g), and 26.3 {I13} from Coulomb excitation 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$weighted average of +0.05 {I+14-15} from (|a,p|g) and +0.17 {I+16-17} from (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 877.2 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 2.62 {I25} from (p,p'|g), 2.7 {I13} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 2.9 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 2.1 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 1.9 {I10} from Coulomb excitation. 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1547.03 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 1546.6 {I4} from (|a,p|g), 1547.1 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 1547.3 {I3} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100.0 {I21} from (|a,p|g), 100.0 {I32} from (n,n'|g), 100.0 {I6} from (p,p'|g), and 100.0 {I16} from Coulomb excitation 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$unweighted average of +0.13 {I+5-4} in (|a,p|g) and +0.27 {I5} in (|g,|g'). Other: +0.05 {I+6-8} in (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 5.09 {I26} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and 6.3 {I18} from Coulomb excitation 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0063 {I+11-12} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=38 {I7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 899.1 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 899.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 898.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 898.7 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 899.1 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 899.2 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 899.1 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 82 {I17} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 76.7 {I32} from (|a,p|g), 81.8 {I18} from (p,|g):E=res, 81.8 {I23} from (n,n'|g), 75 {I4} from (p,p'|g), 69.5 {I17} from (d,{+3}He|g), and 74.5 {I18} from Coulomb excitation. 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. Others: +0.05 {I+3-2} or -5.1 {I+9-16} in (p,p'|g), +0.05 {I5} in (|a,p|g), +0.05 {I+10-20} in (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1861.2 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 1861.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1860.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1861.2 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 1861.2 {I3} from (n,n'|g), and 1861.3 {I1} from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 1861.0 {I4} from (|a,p|g). 
RI$from (d,{+3}He|g). Others: 100 {I15} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100.0 {I32} from (|a,p|g), 100.0 {I18} from (p,|g):E=res, 100.0 {I29} from (n,n'|g), 100 {I4} from (p,p'|g), and 100.0 {I22} from Coulomb excitation. 
M$Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,|ap|g) and ({+18}O,|ap2n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: E2(+M3) with |d=-0.1 {I1} from (|a,pn|g), +0.07 {I+7-5} from (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Others: 1048.7 {I8} from (|a,p|g) and 1049.0 {I17} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 42 {I11} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 48 {I6} from (|a,p|g), 53.0 {I28} from (n,n'|g), and 55.0 {I32} from (p,p'|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: |<+0.36 in (p,p'|g); >7 also from (|a,p|g) is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 1342.0 {I18} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 23 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 46.3 {I11} from (p,|g):E=res, 33 {I12} from (n,n'|g), and 24.2 {I32} from (p,p'|g). Other: 74 {I7} from (|a,p|g) is largely discrepant with others. 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2011.8 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 2011.4 {I7} from (|a,p|g), and 2011.2 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I16} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I7} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I4} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$0.0 {I3} or >1.4 in (p,p'|g), +0.41 {I14} or +1.4 {I3} in (|g,|g'), +0.06 {I+9-8} or +3.1 {I+13-8} in (|a,p|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.042 {I8} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=18.1 {I+34-32} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 515.0 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 76.1 {I13} from (p,|g):E=res and 61 {I10} from (p,p'|g). Others: 170 {I85} from (n,n'|g), 19 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 147 {I10} from (|a,p|g) are discrepant 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g), if J=3/2; |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$-0.10 {I+8-10} from (|a,p|g) if J(2062)=3/2. Other: -3.2 {I+10-18} for J=3/2 also from (|a,p|g) ruled out by RUL 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.27 {I+15-7} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.7|*10{+3} {I+10-5} exceeds RUL=300 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1392.51 {I14} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1392.3 {I1} from (n,n'|g). Other: 1392.3 {I12} from (|a,p|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I13} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 1 {I9} from (|a,p|g), 100.0 {I11} from (p,|g):E=res, 100 {I14} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I7} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g), if J=3/2; |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$+0.27 {I+16-15} or -3.7 {I+12-25} in (|a,p|g) and +0.49 {I+|@-19} in (p,p'|g), if J=3/2 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.018 {I+10-5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=16 {I+9-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2062.1 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 29.5 {I29} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 33.3 {I11} from (p,|g):E=res, and 41 {I4} from (p,p'|g). Others: 31 {I5} from (|a,p|g), 75 {I27} from (n,n'|g), and 41 {I4} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g), if J=3/2; |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$-0.26 {I+16-18} from (|a,p|g) if J=3/2. Other: <-7 or >7 also from (|a,p|g) for J=3/2 ruled out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 533.8 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 535.0 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 33 {I11} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 25.6 {I26} from (p,|g):E=res, and 21.3 {I23} from (p,p'|g). Other: 79 {I29} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$other: 754.6 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 50 {I28} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 69 {I5} from (p,|g):E=res, 54 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 86 {I7} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from (p,p'|g); |D|p=no from level scheme. 
MR$from (p,p'|g). Others: +0.28 {I8} or +6 {I+6-3} in (|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 61.5 {I26} from (p,|g):E=res, and 49 {I4} from (p,p'|g). Other: 167 {I30} from (n,n'|g) for a doublet. 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$from (p,p'|g). Other: >2.2 also from (p,p'|g) ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 2081.4 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I11} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I6} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from (p,p'|g); |D|p=no from level scheme. 
MR$+0.03 {I+11-10} or -3.7 {I+10-34} from (p,p'|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0080 {I+16-14} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.2 {I6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 765.7 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 765.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 765.2 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 765.5 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), and 765.5 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g). Others: 764.9 {I6} from (|a,p|g) and 765.0 {I16} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 53 {I20} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 76.9 {I19} from (p,|g):E=res, 82.7 {I23} from (n,n'|g), 90 {I4} from (p,p'|g). Others: 110 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g) and 12.4 {I8} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) are discrepant. 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from (|a,pn|g). Others: -0.10 {I19} or +1.3 {I+7-5} in (p,p'|g); -0.25 {I+17-24} or +1.3 {I+7-5} in (|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1130.67 {I25} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 1130.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1129.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1130.4 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), and 1130.4 {I2} from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 1130.0 {I18} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I4} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 100 {I4} from (p,p'|g), 100 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g), 100 {I20} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 100 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g) and (|a,pn|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$from (|a,p|g). Other: -1.0 {I4} in (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2092.6 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 2092.5 {I5} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 2093.1 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 2092.6 {I5} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 17.3 {I19} from (p,|g):E=res, 20.4 {I17} from (p,p'|g), and 34 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g) Others: 7.1 {I4} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and 11.4 {I14} from (n,n'|g) are discrepant. 
M$Q(+O) with |d=+10 {I22}; M2,O components ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,|ap|g). Others: 880.7 {I5} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 881.3 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 880.0 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 881.0 {I1} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Others: 100.0 {I35} from (p,p'|g); I(881|g)/I(1245.4|g)=18.5/100 in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and 30/100 in ({+16}O,|ap|g) are discrepant 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,p|g) and (p,p'|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$from (|a,p|g). Other: -0.24 {I+6-8} or -2.0 {I4} in (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1246.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1245.5 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1245.0 {I18} from (n,n'|g), and 1245.2 {I2} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 69.5 {I31} from (|a,p|g) and 74.8 {I35} from (p,p'|g) 
M$Q(+O) with |d=-0.01 {I+4-5} in (p,p'|g) and -0.05 {I5} in (|a,p|g), M2 and O components ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 924.3 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 923.5 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 13.3 {I25} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 12 {I4} from (|a,p|g), 11 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 10.6 {I18} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0059 {I16} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=11.9 {I33} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1374.44 {I13} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1374.6 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 43.6 {I31} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 25 {I4} from (|a,p|g), 31.4 {I29} from (p,|g):E=res, 29 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 41.4 {I27} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$+0.1 {I+5-3} or +1.4 {I+12-9} in (p,p'|g); -0.6 {I+3-4} or >+3 in (|a,p|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0053 {I14} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.9 {I13} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Others: 2336.6 {I2} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2336.2 {I20} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I6} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I4} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$0.00 {I9} or -3.6 {I+10-15} in (p,p'|g); +0.04 {I7} or -2.6 {I+8-12} in (|a,p|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0032 {I8} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.01 {I25} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$others: 49 {I7} from (|a,p|g) and 51 {I7} from (p,|g):E=res 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from (|a,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1077.6 {I1} from (n,n'|g), 1077.8 {I2} from (p,p'|g), and 1077.8 {I4} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$weighted average of 83 {I9} from (|a,p|g), 81 {I7} from (p,|g):E=res, 68 {I6} from (n,n'|g), 68 {I5} from (p,p'|g). Other: 133 {I7} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$+0.07 {I+29-19} or +0.92 {I41} in (p,p'|g); -0.12 {I21} in (|a,p|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.044 {I10} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=66 {I+14-15} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1442.8 {I1} from (n,n'|g), 1442.7 {I1} from (p,p'|g), and 1442.4 {I3} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,p'|g). Others: 100 {I9} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I9} from (p,|g):E=res, 100 {I18} from (n,n'|g), 100 {I6} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$-0.24 {I6} or -2.0 {I+5-6} in (p,p'|g); -0.26 {I+6-8} or -1.3 {I+6-4} in (|a,p|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.025 {I6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=21.0 {I+45-48} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1826.2 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1827.7 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 17.1 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 30 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 20.1 {I24} from (p,p'|g) 
MR$-7.1|<|d|<+0.4 from (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Others: 2497.5 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2497.8 {I7} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I9} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I12} from (n,n'|g), and 100.0 {I24} from (p,p'|g) 
MR$-0.14 {I+43-51} or E2, (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 413.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 412.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 414.3 {I4} from (|a,p|g), 413.1 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 414.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 412.8 {I3} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 79.8 {I32} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 83 {I5} from (|a,p|g), 58 {I5} from (n,n'|g). Other: 111 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 644.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 644.2 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 645.4 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 644.4 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 645.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 644.1 {I3} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g). Others: 100 {I5} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1179.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1178.3 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1178.9 {I3} from (|a,p|g), 1178.6 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), 1178.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g), and 1179.1 {I4} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$weighted average of 67.5 {I25} from (|a,p|g), 53 {I10} from (n,n'|g), and 60 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 18.3 {I10} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) is discrepant. 
M$E1+M2 from |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g); D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,|ap|g). Other: 1542.9 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL, but M2 from level scheme. This contradiction makes this |g questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$large intensity from (n,n'|g), but not seen in (p,|g):E=res, which makes this placement is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Others: 2512.2 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2514.9 {I26} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 100 {I12} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 443.13 {I20} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 443.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 15 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 16.8 {I32} from (n,n'|g) 
M$E2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 675.0 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 13.3 {I30} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 14.6 {I32} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0118 {I46} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=45 {I18} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=9.4|*10{+-4} {I+42-40} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.7 {I7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1123.73 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1123.7 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,p'|g). Others: 100 {I11} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 100 {I22} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.018 {I6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=25 {I8} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 1208.8 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 34 {I6} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0017 {I6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.0 {I8} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1573.67 {I20} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1573.1 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Others: 36 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 23.7 {I32} from (p,p'|g) are discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=9.4|*10{+-4} {I32} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.66 {I23} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1865.7 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1866.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 22 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 28 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2536.0 {I2} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2535.1 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 61 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 79 {I11} from (n,n'|g), and 76 {I4} from (p,p'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (p,p'|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$0.0 {I+3-5} or -3 {I+2-26} from (p,p'|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00115 {I38} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.31 {I10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 686.3 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) and 686.6 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 811.6 {I3} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$(d,{+3}He|g). Other: 100 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.084 {I+37-22} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.2|*10{+2} {I+10-6} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 468.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 469.4 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 469.2 {I4} from (|a,p|g), 469.4 {I2} from (|a,pn|g), and 469.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 42.9 {I29} from (|a,p|g), and 34 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g). Other: |d(Q/D)=-0.07 {I+10-30} from (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1350.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1350.3 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 1350.1 {I4} from (|a,p|g), 1350.7 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) and 1350.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100 {I24} from (n,n'|g) 
M$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 685.5 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 34 {I27} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 8.0 {I11} from (p,|g):E=res, and 23 {I12} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.015 {I6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=53 {I+22-20} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1149.52 {I16} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1147.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 32 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 34.1 {I11} from (p,|g):E=res, 54 {I10} from (n,n'|g), and 60 {I14} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.013 {I5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=17 {I+7-6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2026.9 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I10} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0068 {I+27-24} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.9 {I+11-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2696.7 {I2} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2696.2 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 66 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 73.9 {I22} from (p,|g):E=res, 62 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 77 {I8} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0021 {I+8-7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.50 {I+20-17} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 624.3 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay. Other: 217 {I24} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.1 if M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1169.6 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1168.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 31 {I10} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 35 {I13} from (n,n'|g), and 12 {I5} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0093 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<12 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1389.66 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1389.7 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,p'|g). Others: 100 {I14} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I24} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.024 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<21 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 10.8 {I25} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 8.9 {I25} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0014 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<0.8 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2047.0 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 13.1 {I23} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 7.4 {I21} from (p,p'|g). Other: 59 {I13} from (n,n'|g), 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<9.4|*10{+-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<0.39 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2717.0 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2716.3 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 29.2 {I25} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 29.9 {I34} from (p,p'|g). Other: 124 {I24} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<9.9|*10{+-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<0.23 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay only 
M$for the adopted branching ratio and T{-1/2}, none of E1, M1, E2, or their mixture are allowed by RUL: B(M1)(W.u.)=5.5 {I+19-16} exceeds RUL=3 if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=1.6|*10{+5} {I+5-6} greatly exceeds RUL=300 if E2; B(E1)(W.u.)=0.106 {I+30-42} exceeds RUL=0.01. Further investigation is needed for the placement and branching ratio of this transition. If the placement is correct, it is mostly likely M1 based on RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1233.7 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1232.4 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 16 {I6} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 22.8 {I18} from (p,|g):E=res, and 22 {I4} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.027 {I+9-8} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=31 {I+10-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2110.7 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2110.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 42 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 45.6 {I18} from (p,|g):E=res, and 49.8 {I35} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0112 {I+36-30} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.4 {I+14-12} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2780.5 {I3} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2780.0 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I8} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I4} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0106 {I+34-28} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.4 {I+8-6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1479.1 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1481.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, 47 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 49 {I5} from (p,p'|g). Other: 54 {I27} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2806.7 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2808.1 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I19} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I32} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I5} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0033 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<0.71 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (d,{+3}He|g) only 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.091 {I+38-23} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.7|*10{+2} {I+7-4} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g):E=res only, as the only transition seen from the 2832 level, which is however not seen in (d,{+3}He|g). This makes either this placement of this transition questionable or the two levels different 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1445.8 {I4} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 1446.4 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 88.6 {I29} from (p,|g):E=res, 86 {I29} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, and 100 {I16} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 31 {I6} from (p,|g):E=res and 31 {I14} from (p,p'|g). Other: 132 {I16} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2188.0 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2186.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 62.9 {I29} from (p,|g):E=res, 47 {I16} from (n,n'|g), 64 {I11} from (p,p'|g), and 57 {I29} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0012 {I+13-7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.42 {I+45-23} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Others: 2857.7 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2858.0 {I6} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I17} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I14} from (p,p'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=8|*10{+-4} {I+9-5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.18 {I+19-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 1927.0 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 100 {I16} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I9} from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2219.9 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2219.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 52 {I15} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 30.8 {I19} from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 16 {I5} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2889.6 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 2889.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I5} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay, 42 {I4} from (p,|g):E=res, and 28 {I5} from (p,p'|g). Other: 16.3 {I32} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 3044.4 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 3042.5 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: I(3043|g)/I(2373|g)=55 {I10}/100 {I24} is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3100.7 {I7} from {+63}Zn |e+|b{++} decay and 3100.9 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 100 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.06 {I+7-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=14 {I+16-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 28.2 {I26} from (p,|g):E=res and 47 {I8} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.011 {I+13-6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.7 {I+20-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 956.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 955.4 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 956.1 {I5} from (|a,p|g), 955.5 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g). Other: -0.8 {I+2-4} from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 3465.2 {I19} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.004 {I+6-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.6 {I+8-4} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 100 {I9} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.10 {I+18-7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=21 {I+37-13} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 3574.2 {I24} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 59 {I5} from (p,|g):E=res and 85 {I9} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.04 {I+7-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5 {I+9-4} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (d,{+3}He|g) only; not seen in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0065 {I+44-26} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.7 {I+12-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2928 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 2925.9 {I13} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (d,{+3}He|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0030 {I+21-12} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.61 {I+42-25} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 668.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 668.1 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), and 668.5 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M$D from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1623.6 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and 1624.0 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
E,RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 694.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 694.1 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), and 694.3 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+16}O,|ap|g) only 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=9|*10{+-4} {I+6-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.1 {I+15-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1650.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1649.7 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), and 1649.8 {I2} from (|a,pn|g). Other: 1649.6 {I6} fr (|a,p|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 3261.0 {I18} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 100 {I6} from (p,|g):E=res 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.020 {I+11-6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.3 {I+17-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 4221.3 {I14} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res. Other: 25 {I4} from (d,{+3}He|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g):E=res. Others: 3324 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 3327.0 {I34} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (d,{+3}He|g). Other: 100 {I40} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0122 {I+31-26} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.90 {I+48-41} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4282 {I4} from (n,n'|g) and 4286.6 {I9} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$weighted average of 52 {I24} from (n,n'|g) and 61 {I11} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0033 {I+9-8} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.31 {I+9-8} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 342.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 342.1 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 340.9 {I5} from (|a,p|g), and 342.3 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), 
M$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4496 {I4} from (n,n'|g) and 4498.6 {I7} from (d,{+3}He|g) 
RI$from (p,|g):E=res 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0112 {I+42-32} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.96 {I+36-27} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 421.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 421.2 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), and 421.3 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M$D from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|ap2n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme. Other: |d(Q/D)=-0.07 {I+10-30} from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (|a,pn|g). Other: 447.4 {I5} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g). Other: 860.8 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g) and |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|apn|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 835.7 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and 836.3 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g); M1+E2 is more likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1786.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g), 1786.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g), and 1787.0 {I2} from (|a,pn|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 790.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,|ap|g) and 789.4 {I3} from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,|ap2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from A{-2}=+0.32 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I13} (1979Vo01); |D|p=no from level scheme. Other: D from asymmetry=0.60 {I10} (1972Sz01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from Adopted Gammas 
MR$deduced by the evaluator from measured B(E2)|^=0.0116 {I6} and T{-1/2}=0.22 ps {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) and E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$others: -0.21 {I8} (1964El03), -0.41 {I+7-11} (1964Ro10), -0.48 {I6} (1967No04), and -0.50 {I9} (1972Ro21); 0.52 {I4} from measured B(E2)|^=0.0355 {I17} and T{-1/2}=0.61 ps {I4} from this dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$other: 16 {I1} (1980Ku08) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) and E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$others: -0.085 {I35} from |g(|q) and -0.125 {I34} from |g|g(|q) in 1972Ro21 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 669.6 {I2} (1969Bo15), 669.71 {I10} (1971GiZS), and 669.62 {I5} (1974Kl02) 
M$M1 from ce data in 1961Cu02 
$|a{-T}(exp)=5.2|*10{+-4} {I3} (1961Cu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 961.9 {I2} (1969Bo15), 962.14 {I10} (1971GiZS), and 962.06 {I4} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 78.8 {I22} (1969Bo15), 79.8 {I32} (1971GiZS), and 79 {I4} (1974Kl02) 
$|a{-T}(exp)=2.3|*10{+-4} {I3} (1961Cu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Other: 364.5 {I20} (1969Bo15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.22 {I11} (1969Bo15) and 0.14 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1326.4 {I3} (1969Bo15), 1327.0 {I4} (1971GiZS), and 1327.03 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.99 {I12} (1969Bo15), 0.84 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 0.84 {I5} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 450.0 {I2} (1971GiZS) and 449.93 {I5} (1974Kl02). Other: 450.0 {I5} (1969Bo15) 
RI$weighted average of 2.95 {I55} (1969Bo15), 2.7 {I2} (1971GiZS), and 2.88 {I20} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 742.5 {I5} (1969Bo15), 742.5 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 742.25 {I10} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1974Kl02. Others: 0.86 {I13} (1969Bo15) and 0.76 {I13} (1971GiZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1411.9 {I2} (1969Bo15), 1412.07 {I20} (1971GiZS), and 1412.08 {I5} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 8.75 {I33} (1969Bo15), 9.3 {I4} (1971GiZS), and 9.1 {I4} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 585.2 {I5} (1971GiZS) and 584.82 {I15} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.22 {I10} (1971GiZS) and 0.40 {I5} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1546.9 {I2} (1969Bo15) and 1547.04 {I6} (1974Kl02). Other: 1546.8 {I6} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 1.42 {I22} (1969Bo15), 1.6 {I1} (1971GiZS), and 1.49 {I6} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 899.2 {I6} (1971GiZS) and 899.0 {I4} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1974Kl02. Other: 0.16 {I6} (1971GiZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1860.9 {I6} (1971GiZS) and 1861.3 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.24 {I5} (1971GiZS) and 0.170 {I24} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2012.0 {I5} (1969Bo15), 2012.0 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 2011.4 {I5} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1974Kl02. Others: 0.120 {I22} (1969Bo15) and 0.14 {I3} (1971GiZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1391.5 {I4} (1969Bo15), 1392.3 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 1392.55 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$unweighted average of 1.75 {I11} (1969Bo15), 1.24 {I12} (1971GiZS), and 1.18 {I18} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Others: 2062.0 {I8} (1969Bo15) and 2062.3 {I5} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 0.350 {I77} (1969Bo15), 0.41 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 0.42 {I4} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 754.4 {I7} (1971GiZS) and 754.8 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.33 {I15} (1971GiZS) and 0.08 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2082.0 {I5} (1969Bo15), 2081.4 {I7} (1971GiZS), and 2081.4 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1974Kl02. Others: 0.164 {I44} (1969Bo15) and 0.21 {I5} (1971GiZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Other: 1130.6 {I5} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I4} (1971GiZS) and 0.16 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Other: 2092.5 {I8} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 0.057 {I25} (1971GiZS) and 0.03 {I1} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Others: 923.5 {I10} (1969Bo15) and 924.6 {I6} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 0.252 {I88} (1969Bo15), 0.13 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 0.120 {I24} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1374.3 {I3} (1969Bo15), 1374.4 {I3} (1971GiZS), and 1374.47 {I13} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.481 {I88} (1969Bo15), 0.41 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 0.42 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2336.5 {I2} (1969Bo15), 2336.8 {I3} (1971GiZS), and 2336.5 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 1.039 {I66} (1969Bo15), 0.99 {I8} (1971GiZS), and 0.91 {I6} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1825.4 {I6} (1971GiZS) and 1827.0 {I5} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I4} (1971GiZS) and 0.051 {I13} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2497.7 {I4} (1969Bo15), 2497.5 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 2497.4 {I4} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1969Bo15. Others: 0.25 {I3} (1971GiZS) and 0.26 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2512.0 {I5} (1969Bo15), 2512.5 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 2512.0 {I5} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.142 {I22} (1969Bo15), 0.12 {I3} (1971GiZS), and 0.12 {I2} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1123.7 {I3} (1969Bo15), 1123.8 {I2} (1971GiZS), and 1123.72 {I7} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1974Kl02. Others: 1.53 {I33} (1969Bo15) and 1.3 {I2} (1971GiZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Others: 1208 {I2} (1969Bo15) and 1208.6 {I8} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 0.153 {I44} (1969Bo15), 0.17 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 0.15 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1573.4 {I5} (1971GiZS) and 1573.71 {I20} (1974Kl02). Other: 1574.0 {I20} (1969Bo15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.142 {I44} (1969Bo15), 0.19 {I7} (1971GiZS), and 0.20 {I2} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1865.3 {I3} (1969Bo15), 1865.7 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 1866.1 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.383 {I33} (1969Bo15), 0.26 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 0.24 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2535.9 {I2} (1969Bo15), 2536.2 {I4} (1971GiZS), and 2536.0 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.842 {I44} (1969Bo15), 0.80 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 0.81 {I8} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 684.7 {I17} (1969Bo15) and 685.6 {I6} (1974Kl02) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.45 {I17} (1969Bo15) and 0.05 {I2} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1149.6 {I3} (1971GiZS) and 1149.50 {I16} (1974Kl02). Other: 1150 {I2} (1969Bo15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.295 {I55} (1969Bo15), 0.21 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 0.23 {I3} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1971GiZS. Others: 2027.2 {I5} (1969Bo15) and 2026.8 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.66 {I11} (1969Bo15), 0.78 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 0.68 {I7} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1969Bo15. Others: 2697.0 {I4} (1971GiZS) and 2696.6 {I3} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1974Kl02. Others: 0.470 {I88} (1969Bo15) and 0.5 {I4} (1971GiZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Other: 1168 {I3} (1969Bo15) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.197 {I44} (1969Bo15) and 0.094 {I20} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Kl02. Other: 1389.5 {I6} (1971GiZS) 
RI$weighted average of 0.44 {I9} (1971GiZS) and 0.52 {I7} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2048.6 {I15} (1969Bo15), 2047.2 {I8} (1971GiZS), and 2046.4 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.077 {I11} (1969Bo15), 0.04 {I14} (1971GiZS), and 0.045 {I13} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2717.0 {I5} (1969Bo15), 2717.2 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 2716.9 {I4} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.131 {I22} (1969Bo15), 0.140 {I12} (1971GiZS), and 0.16 {I2} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2110.6 {I6} (1971GiZS) and 2110.8 {I5} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.087 {I22} (1971GiZS) and 0.075 {I15} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2780.6 {I3} (1971GiZS) and 2780.3 {I4} (1974Kl02). Other: 2780.1 {I20} (1969Bo15) 
RI$weighted average of 0.197 {I22} (1969Bo15), 0.180 {I15} (1971GiZS), and 0.19 {I2} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2806.5 {I4} (1969Bo15), 2807.1 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 2806.6 {I6} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0295 {I66} (1969Bo15), 0.039 {I7} (1971GiZS), and 0.05 {I1} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2857.4 {I10} (1969Bo15), 2857.8 {I7} (1971GiZS), and 2857.6 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0361 {I77} (1969Bo15), 0.032 {I6} (1971GiZS), and 0.04 {I1} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1926.4 {I20} (1969Bo15), 1926.8 {I8} (1971GiZS), and 1927.2 {I7} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.066 {I11} (1969Bo15), 0.082 {I25} (1971GiZS), and 0.070 {I14} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2891.1 {I15} (1969Bo15), 2889.5 {I5} (1971GiZS), and 2889.4 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$from 1971GiZS. Others: 0.0263 {I55} (1969Bo15) and 0.03 {I1} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3044.9 {I10} (1969Bo15), 3044.0 {I7} (1971GiZS), and 3044.6 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.055 {I11} (1969Bo15), 0.058 {I10} (1971GiZS), and 0.06 {I1} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3100.9 {I7} (1969Bo15), 3100.3 {I10} (1971GiZS), and 3100.7 {I8} (1974Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0088 {I22} (1969Bo15), 0.009 {I4} (1971GiZS), and 0.007 {I2} (1974Kl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$This |g is placed from 4576 level by 2018Ra15 in {+52}Cr({+18}O,|ap2n|g) and 2000Mu20 in {+52}Cr({+16}O,|ap|g), which is adopted in Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=860.12 
$DCO=0.41 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym}=0.110 {I90} 
$listed as 23/2+ to 21/2+ transition in Table I which is a typo 
M$DCO consistent with |DJ=1, but |DJ=2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.3 {I+4-5} is tentative based on authors' tentative J|p=(13/2+); M2,M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1979Vo01. Other: D from asymmetry=0.60 {I10} (1972Sz01); -0.04 {I1} (1978Br35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-1.26 if J(9863)=9/2 (1979Vo01); however, M1 from asymmetry=0.50 {I15} (1972Sz01). 
RI$from 1979Vo01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from measured B(E2)(W.u.)<49 in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}=21 ps {I4}. Others: +0.12 {I4}, +0.02 {I1}, +0.04 {I4}, 0.02 {I4}, -0.01 {I2} in (p,n|g), +0.035 in (|a,pn|g). Assuming T{-1/2} is correct, |d=+0.12 {I4} gives B(E2)(W.u.)=250 {I170} which is larger than B(E2)(W.u.)<49 measured in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Branching ratios from (p,n|g) (1976Gr13) 
MR$RUL(E2)=300 does not allow other possible |d=-3.0 to -7.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Branching ratios from (p,n|g) (1976Gr13) 
MR$any value possible from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1. B(E2)(W.u.)>1827 for pure E2 is much larger than RUL=300, suggesting that |d(E2/M1)<0.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+7}Li,pn|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1. B(E2)(W.u.)>11090 for pure E2 is much larger than RUL=300, suggesting that |d(E2/M1)<0.017 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Branching ratios from (p,n|g) (1976Gr13). Values are consistent with those from (n,|g) 
MR$+0.2 to +5.7 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$E|g from (d,p|g), I|g from (p,n|g). Not reported in (n,|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<4660 for pure E2 is much larger than RUL=300, suggesting |d(E2/M1)<0.26 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,pn|g) and ({+7}Li,pn|g). Not reported in (n,|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,pn|g). Other: 30 in (|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,pn|g). Others: 24 {I24} in (n,|g), 121 {I10} in ({+7}Li,pn|g). This |g has been reported in several |g-ray studies, but with different intensities, while not reported in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from (d,p|g) and ({+7}Li,pn|g). This |g not reported in (p,n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,pn|g) only 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$Note that 617|g is the only transition from the 895 level seen in several |g-ray studies, for example (n,|g) E=Th; (p,n|g); ({+7}Li,pn|g); (|a,pn|g), and other reactions with |g rays. 
MR$+0.07 to +2.5 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$+0.40 {I13} for a possible doublet (736.5|g+739.1|g). 
RI$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 82 {I8} in (p,n|g). This |g not reported in ({+7}Li,pn|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+7}Li,pn|g) only. Evaluators treat the placement from 1594, 6- level as uncertain as it is possible that this |g corresponds to 1232.13|g from 1594, (1+,2) level as seen in (n,|g) E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+7}Li,pn|g) only. Evaluators treat the placement from 1594, 6- level as highly questionable as it requires mult=M4, with unrealistic B(M4)(W.u.)=6.6|*10{+6} {I19}. It is possible that this |g corresponds to 1315.3|g from 1594, (1+,2) level as seen in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$It is possible that 313.6|g in ({+7}Li,pn|g) corresponds to 315|g in (|a,pn|g) from 2021 level, although, strong 780.0|g from 2021 level is not reported in ({+7}Li,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$In ({+7}Li,pn|g) (2018Sa02), this |g feeds 1460, 4- level, based on mult(629.7|g)=D+Q. But, evaluators have assigned (2-) to the 1460 level based on L-transfer data. As R{-ADO}=0.98 {I6} in ({+7}Li,pn|g) is quite large, it is possible that the 629.7 transition is |DJ=2, Q rather than |DJ=0, D+Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$Negative A{-2} from |g(|q), as stated in section 3 of text in 1976Ch36, but no numerical data provided 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$others: +0.02 {I1} (1973Za07), +0.04 {I4} (1971Mi15), 0.02 {I4} (1971We02), -0.01 {I2} (1970Da01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$(184|g)(159|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I7} 
MR$or -3.0 to -7.1. Other: |<0 (1971Mi15). RUL(E2) does not allow large E2 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$Value of A{-2}=-0.42 {I20} (1972Na27) is in disagreement but A{-2}=0.00 {I4} (1970Da01) agrees 
$(384|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} 
MR$+0.07 {I5} or -2.9 to -4.7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$Value of A{-2}=-0.06 {I10} (1970Da01) is in disagreement 
$(461|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.46 {I17}, A{-4}=0.00 {I18} 
MR$other: +0.4 {I1} (1970Da01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Value of A{-2}=-0.15 {I6} (1972Na27) is in disagreement but A{-2}=+0.31 {I4} (1970Da01) agrees well 
$(580|g)(159|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.50 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I15} 
MR$other: +0.05 {I4} (1970Da01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement established by |g|g (1976Gr13,1970Da01) 
$(534|g)(344|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.27 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1976Gr13. Also reported by 1972Na27 but not by 1979Gu17 and 1972Gu17 
RI$from branching=3% {I1} (1976Gr13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Alternate placement (1972Gu17) from 1241 level not supported by branching ratio data. In (n,|g) E=th, based on energy agreement an 897.06|g was placed from a 3629 level, not from 896 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$(649|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} 
MR$or -2.5 to -5.7 for J(927)=1. |d=-0.11 {I5} for J=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$R{-ADO}=0.67 {I7} 
RI$uncertainty of 15.2 in Table I of 2018Sa02 seems a misprint, evaluators consider it as 1.52 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E2+M3 in 2018Sa02 
$R{-ADO}=0.57 {I3}, POL=+0.8 {I20}. Note that R{-ADO} is inconsistent with Mult=E2+M3 in 2018Sa02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from Coulomb excitation. 
MR from B(E2)|^=0.0096 {I8} in Coulomb excitation and adopted T{-1/2}=103 fs {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from {+65}Zn |e decay. 
M from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|g,|g') and RUL 
MR from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|g,|g'). |d=0.449 {I21} from B(E2)=0.029 {I2} which is a weighted average of 0.029 {I2} from (e,e') and 0.030 {I3} from Coulomb excitation and the adopted T{-1/2}. -0.09 {I8} in {+64}Ni(p,|g) (1973Ho42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay and RUL 
MR from analysis of |g|g(|q) data in {+65}Ni |b{+-} decay; |d=-0.031 {I5} or +9.4 {I5}. The larger value is rejected from RUL. Others: -0.16 {I6} from Coulomb excitation, -0.07 {I+14-7} or +4.5 {I12} from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M from Coulomb excitation. 
MR |d(E2+M3)=+0.24 {I6} or +3.2 {I+6-3} from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g) but |d(E2+M3)|<6|*10{+-4} from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay and RUL 
MR from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; |d=-2.8 {I3} or +0.20 {I4}; the smaller value is preferred from RUL. Other: +0.3 {I+8-4} or <-1.3 from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from J|p's of levels involved, measured |g(|q) anisotropy from oriented nuclei in {+65}Ni |b{+-} decay and |g(|q) data in {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). 
MR from {+65}Ni |b{+-} decay. Other: -0.03 {I9} or +3.7 {I+26-8} from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay and RUL 
MR from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay. |d=-0.08 {I5} or +4.8 {I+26-13}; the larger value rejected from RUL 
RI %branching=50 in {+64}Ni(p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E 1442 {I2} from {+65}Cu(n,n'|g) but 1438.6 {I4} (reported as the only |g depopulating a level at 2209.2) from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from {+64}Ni(p,|g) data. 
MR 0.15 {I5} or 1.9 {I9} (phase not available). 
M from |g(|q) data in {+65}Cu(|g,|g') and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g), the uncertainty has been doubled by the evaluators. 
|d(Q/D)=+0.18 {I13} or +2.4 {I7} from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g and branching are from {+65}Cu(p,p'|g). The uncertainty on E|g has been doubled by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR -0.4 {I+2-1} from measured |g(|q) anisotropy from oriented nuclei (1976Kr09). 
|b-|g(CP) data, asymmetry A=0.23 {I4} (1968At03) A=0.292 {I37} (1969Be28) consistent with a 5/2-(|b{+-})5/2-(|g)3/2- cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
(366|g)(1115|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.172 {I6}, A{-4}=0.013 {I10} (1965Sp07). Others: 1958Ha11, 1960Ja16, 1963Cl06. 
MR -0.031 {I5} or +9.4 {I5} from analysis of |g|g(|q) data of 1965Sp07. The larger value is rejected from RUL. Other: -0.03 {I3} from measured |g(|q) anisotropy from oriented nuclei (1976Kr09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972Pa30. 
(507|g)(1115|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.200 {I35}, A{-4}=-0.013 {I57} (1965Sp07). 
MR -2.8 {I3} or +0.20 {I4} from analysis of |g|g(|q) data of 1965Sp07. The smaller value is preferred from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1972Pa30. 
(607|g)(1115|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.209 {I69}, A{-4}=-0.160 {I111} (1965Sp07). 
MR -0.08 {I5} or +4.8 {I+26-13} from analysis of |g|g(|q) data of 1965Sp07. The larger value is rejected from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR -0.2 {I4} or <-4.6 or >+2.3. 
Multipolarity, |d: from measured |g(|q) anisotropy from oriented nuclei (1976Kr09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI From I|g(771)/I|g(1115)=5.36|*10{+-5} {I44} (2006Be34) 
RI from I|g(344)/I|g(1116)=6.0x10{+-5} {I6} (1968St05) and assumption that I{-|g+ce}(770) = I{-|g+ce}(344) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(344)/I|g(1116)=6.0x10{+-5} {I6} (1968St05) 
RI From I|g(344)/I|g(1115)=5.07|*10{+-5} {I37} (2006Be34). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight analysis (1985ZiZY, 1992Ra09) of the 7 values: 51.3 {I30} (1959Gl55), 50.7 {I5} (1963Ta04), 51.3 {I15} (1966Ra21), 52.4 {I10} (1968Ha47), 50.75 {I10} (1972De24), 49.3 {I8} (1973Po10), and 50.2 {I4} (1990Sc08). In this analysis the uncertainty of the 1972De24 value was increased from 0.10 to 0.27 to reduce its relative weight to 50%, then the internal uncertainty is 0.19, the reduced-|h{+2} is 1.25, and the external uncertainty 0.22. Other values: 46 (1946Go06) and 50.39 {I26} (1982DeYX, replaced by 1990Sc08). 
RI$Weighted average of: 50.22 {I11}, from nine values of an international exercise (EUROMET 721), 4 |p|b|g coincidence (2006Be34), and 51.3 {I30} (1959Gl55), 50.7 {I5} (1963Ta19), 51.3 {I15} (1966Ra21), 49.3 {I8} (1973Po10); 50.15 {I28} 4 |p|b|g coincidence (2006Ko31); 49.71 {I16} 4 |p|b|g coincidence (2005Iw01); 49.76 {I21} absolute |g-ray intensity measurement using a source of known activity (2003Lu06). Others: 1992Ra09, 1990Sc08, 1972De24, 1968Ha47, and 1946Go06. 
CC,EKC From 1985HaZA evaluation of measured values and primarity based on 1966Ha07; the interpolated values from tables of Band (1976Ba63) are |a{-K}=1.66x10{+-4} and |a=1.83x10{+-4}, which are in good agreement. 
CC From the theoretical tables of 1979Sc31, the internal pair formation coefficients are |a{-|p}(M1) |? 1.2x10{+-6} and |a{-|p}(E2) |? 1.6x10{+-6}, so |a{-|p}(1115) |? 1.3x10{+-6}. This value is only 1% of the conversion coefficient, so it is negligible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E from adopted gammas. 
Multipolarity, |d: from |g(|q) 1968Me09. |d(D+Q)=-0.52 {I7} or -1.09 {I+9-12} from 1964Be21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. 
MR 0.15 {I5} or 1.8 {I8} (1976Sw01). Phase not available. 
Multipolarity, |d: from |g(|q) data of 1976Sw01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. 
MR 0.15 {I5} or 1.9 {I9} (1976Sw01). Phase not available. 
Multipolarity, |d: from |g(|q) data of 1976Sw01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E uncertainty reported as 0.3 (1977Ha13) increased to 0.5 by evaluators because of a poor fit to level energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E uncertainty taken as 1 for the least-squares fit calculation. 
MR -0.437 {I15} from adopted gammas. Values of |d obtained by different methods are not in good agreement. |d=-0.46 {I3} using adopted B(E2) and T{-1/2}(1115 level)=0.285 ps. |d from |g(|q) data are: -0.24 {I13} (1964El03), -0.22 {I6} or -1.8 (1964Ro10), -0.19 {I6} or -1.9 {I3} (1966Gu10) and -0.28 {I5} (1972Ro21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Branching: 24% (1964El03). 
MR from |g|g(|q) at 0|' and 90|' (obtained using |d(1115|g)=-0.28 {I5}) and from I|g(|q=0)/I|g(|q=90) (1972Ro21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.12 {I7}, A{-4} set to 0 from |g|g(|q) with gate on 861|g 
$ A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} from |g|g(|q) with gate on 1115|g 
MR$ -0.11 for 861 gate, -0.15 for 1115 gate 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$ +0.03 from 1115-keV gating, -0.06 from 1246-keV gating 
$A{-2}=+0.06 {I6} from |g|g(|q) with gate on 1115|g, +0.11 {I7} from |g|g(|q) with gate on 1246|g. A{-4} set to zero 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$ +1.6 from 1115-keV gating, +1.0 from 1670-keV gating 
$ A{-2}2=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} from |g|g(|q) with gate on 861|g 
$ A{-2}=+0.47 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} from |g|g(|q) with gate on 2503|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$ A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} from |g|g(|q) with gate on 861|g 
$ A{-2}=-0.07 {I6}, A{-4} set to 0 from |g|g(|q) with gate on 2503|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=0.05 {I4} 
$|a(exp): deduced from intensity balance in {+68}Cu IT decay. 
M$|a(exp) allows E1 or M1. See J|p argument for the 84 level in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=3.53 {I15} 
$|a(exp): deduced from intensity balance in {+68}Co IT decay 
M$|a(exp) allows E3 or M3; placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 95 {I5} (1975Ti01), 96.4 {I58} (1972Sw01). 2003Ho31 suggest discrepancy is due to change in intensity of 80|g and 81|g in {+133}Ba source used for efficiency calibration. 
$|a(exp)=0.05 {I4} 
$|a(exp): deduced from intensity balance 
M$|a(exp) allows E1 or M1. See comment on J|p(84 level) in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 1.7 {I5} (1975Ti01), 1.4 {I4} (1972Sw01). Discrepancy could be due to coincidence summing effects. 
M$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=3.53 {I15} 
$|a(exp): deduced from intensity balance 
M$|a(exp) allows E3 or M3; placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 {I5} (2008St04) 
E$others: 534.4 {I6} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) and 534.3 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0041 {I+29-13}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=30 {I+22-9} 
E$weighted average of 446.9 {I1} from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s) and 447.2 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 
RI$other: 29 {I5} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0063 {I+10-9}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=21.4 {I+35-31} 
E$other: 654.9 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.6 {I18} from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s), 10.4 {I11} from ({+64}Ni,X|g), and 9.6 {I18} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1189.5 {I1} from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s), 1189.1 {I4} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g), and 1189.2 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 
RI$from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s). Others: 100 {I4} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) and 100.0 {I30} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1251.7 {I1} from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s) and 1252.2 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g). Other: 1251.6 {I9} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 520.2 {I1} from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s) and 520.6 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 342.4 {I9} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 16 {I8} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g) and 11.6 {I15} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 939.5 {I2} from {+71}Ni |b{+-} decay (2.56 s), 939.1 {I4} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g), and 939.1 {I2} from ({+64}Ni,X|g) 
RI$from ({+64}Ni,X|g). Other: 100 {I10} from {+198}Pt({+76}Ge,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) deduced by evaluators. 2015Sa09 give B(E2)=0.0044 {I20} without accounting for branching of 447-keV transition from 981 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$ |g not observed directly. Its existence is assumed based on the decay and population time pattern of the two observed gammas, 61.7 and 66.2 in 2013Pe03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$ |g not observed directly. Its existence is assumed based on the decay and population time pattern of the two observed gammas, 61.7 and 66.2 (Figure 2 from 2013Pe03): the 61.7 |g seems to appear later, showing that the 61.7 level is populated through the decay of the 66.2 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed, from the energy differences of the levels. 
M$pure E2 was not possible when compared with the measured T{-1/2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Tentative placement suggested from observation of 2402|g in coincidence with 293|g (Fig. 2 in 2017Sa32), and stated in revised data Table and comments received June 5, 2020 from the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$Expected by the authors, but not observed experimentally. I|g estimated in 2017Ol07 as one third of I|g(855)= 33 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR if J{-f}=4+, then J{-i}=3+ (or 4+) with |d=-1.0 {i5} (or 0.0 {i2}); if J{-f}=2+, then J{-i}=3+ and |d=-0.5 {i1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR if J{-f}=4, then J{-i}=3 (or 4) with |d=-1.0 {i5} (or 0.0 {i2}); if J{-f}=2, then J{-i}=3 and |d=-0.5 {i1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 88.0 {I1} (1982Sm01), 88.4 {I1} (1984Th07) and 88.9 {I1} (2009An01,2006An31). Weighted average is the same but with a large |h{+2} value 
CC$assuming 25% uncertainty in |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 330.4 {I3} (1982Sm01), 329.8 {I5} (1984Th07), 331.3 {I2} (2009An01,2006An31). Weighted average is 330.9 {I4} with a large |h{+2} value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 418.4 {I1} (1982Sm01), 418.5 {I2} (1984Th07), 419.1 {I2} (2009An01,2006An31). Weighted average is 419.2 {I2} with a large |h{+2} value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 337.0 {I7} (1982Sm01), 338.6 {I2} (1984Th07), 339.0 {I2} (2009An01,2006An31). Weighted average is 338.7 {I3} with a large |h{+2} value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 16 {I4} in (|a,n|g) (1982Sm01) and 43 {i10} in |e decay. Value of 232 {I43} from 1984Th07 in (|a,n|g) seems discrepant thus not used 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of values from (|a,n|g) (1982Sm01,1984Th07) and {+40}Ca({+24}Mg,2pn|g) (2006An31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Questionable placement suggested in 1982Sm01, 50% relative branching from 1989Sc28 in (|a,n|g). Note that there is a 1239|g from 1658 level proposed by 1984Th07. Evaluators consider the 1240|g from 1362 level as suspect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|g branching ratios are from ({+24}Mg,2pn|g) (2006An31). Corresponding values from (|a,n|g) (1982Sm01) are in reasonable agreement, but in sharp disagreements with those from 1984Th07 and 1989Sc28 in (|a,ng) 
RI$100 in (|a,n|g) (1984Th07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
CC$assuming 25% uncertainty on |d(E2/M1) 
MR$2002We07 suggest |d=0.2 or 3.8 based on A{-2}=-0.03 {I3} for the 88|g in |g(|q) data from 1982Sm01. Lower value is adopted here, higher value will suggest a long lifetime for the level 
RI$100 {I28} (1999Oi01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.55; corrected for the estimated level lifetime 
$R{-DCO}=0.38 {I3} (2004Iz01), 0.82 {I7} (1999Vi12) 
$R{-154|',90|'}=0.96 {I4} from 2005An03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.64 {I3} 
$R{-DCO}=0.30 {I4}. POL=+0.041 {I12} (2004Iz01) 
$R{-154|',90|'}=0.59 {I2} (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=0.38 {I3} from (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.48 {I7}, combined for 996.7|g+997.0|g+994.1|g 
$R{-DCO}=0.99 {I6}. POL=+0.07 {I6} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=1.49 {I7} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=1.00 {I19} from (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.62 {I7} 
$R{-DCO}=1.15 {I9}. POL=+0.096 {I25} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=1.60 {I7} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=1.19 {I14} from (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.37 {I2}, combined for 1006|g+1005|g 
$R{-154|',90|'}=0.35 {I2} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=0.51 {I17} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.77 {I8} 
$POL=+0.10 {I4} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=1.70 {I8} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=1.2 {I3} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.84 {I4} for 1403 doublet 
$R{-DCO}=0.54 {I4}. POL=+0.063 {I13} for doublet (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=0.85 {I4} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=0.60 {I3} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.70 {I7}, combined for 1531|g+1532|g 
$R{-DCO}=0.91{I7}. POL=+0.03 {I8} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=1.66 {I7} (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=1.26 {I17} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.70 {I7} 
$R{-DCO}=1.11{I7}. POL=+0.087 {I12} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=1.70 {I8} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=1.03{I7} from (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.98 {I6} 
$R{-DCO}=0.45 {I6}. POL=+0.14 {I5} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-154|',90|'}=0.77 {I6} from (2005An03). 
$R{-DCO}=0.44 {I9} from (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.73 {I4} 
$R{-DCO}=0.44 {I4}. POL=+0.07 {I3} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=0.36 {I10} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.76 {I7} 
$R{-DCO}=0.99 {I6}. POL=+0.072 {I14} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=1.03 {I25} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.66 {I9} 
$R{-DCO}=1.00 {I12}. POL=+0.12 {I5} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=1.0 {I4} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.67 {I9} 
$R{-DCO}=0.88 {I7}. POL=+0.10 {I3} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}= 1.04{I18} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.69 {I8} for 1675 doublet 
$R{-DCO}=0.91 {I6}. POL=+0.059 {I20} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=1.2 {I5} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.93 {I10} 
$R{-DCO}=0.94 {I7}. POL=+0.09 {I7} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=0.7 {I3} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=0.60 {I6} 
$R{-DCO}=0.48 {I3}. POL=+0.090 {I17} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=0.68 {I23} (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.70 {I7}, combined for 1531|g+1532|g 
$R{-DCO}=0.95 {I7}. POL=+0.039 {I22} (2004Iz01). 
$R{-DCO}=0.7 {I4} from (1999Vi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-154|',96|'}=1.48 {I7}, combined for 996.7|g+997.0|g+994.1|g 
$R{-DCO}=0.99 {I6}. POL=+0.13 {I4} (2004Iz01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$average of 88.0 {I1} (1982Sm01), 88.4 {I1} (1984Th07) 
$E|g=88.0 {I1}, I|g=4.3 {I2} (1982Sm01) 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {i3} (1982Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=123.6 {I1}, I|g=100 (1982Sm01) 
MR$other: -0.01 {I+11-7} or -3.2+17-11 (1982Sm01). 
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {i9} (1982Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=418.4 {I1}, I|g=45.2 {I9} (1982Sm01) 
MR$other: +0.04 {I+27-14} (1982Sm01). 
$A{-2}=+0.15 {i4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {i5}. POL=+0.18 {I8} 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {i3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {i4} (1982Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=755.6 {I1}, I|g=64.4 {I12} (1982Sm01) 
MR$other: -0.3 {I+1-2} (1982Sm01). 
$A{-2}=-0.66 {i2}, A{-4}=+0.10 {i2}. POL=-0.17 {I8} 
$A{-2}=-0.75 {i3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {i4} (1982Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=872.7 {I1}, I|g=49.0 {I8} (1982Sm01) 
MR$other:-1.7 {I+2-3} (1982Sm01) 
$A{-2}=-0.77 {i3},A{-4}=-0.24 {i6}. POL=+0.14 {I9} 
$A{-2}=-0.73 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i5} (1982Sm01) 
E$882 keV in table 1 of 1989Sc28 may be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=996.4 {I2}, I|g=21.8 {I10} (1982Sm01) 
MR$other:-0.09 -9+7 (1982Sm01), 
$A{-2}=+0.19 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.49 {i9}. POL=+0.32 {I27} 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i5} (1982Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1141.1 {I1}, I|g=63.9 {I10} (1982Sm01) 
MR$other:+0.02 {I+1-3} (1982Sm01), 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.28 {i8}. POL=+0.42 {I14} 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {i2}, A{-4}=+0.15 {i2} (1982Sm01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1362.0 {I10}, I|g=7.2 {I4} (1982Sm01) 
MR$-0.29 {i17} or +0.18 {i11} (1989Sc28) 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {i16}, A{-4}=+0.25 {i20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1006.1 {I2}, I|g=17.8 {I14} (1982Sm01) 
$A{-2}=-0.77 {i11}, A{-4}=+0.13 {i18}. POL=+0.9 {I3} 
$A{-2}=-0.53 {i5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {i6} (1982Sm01) 
M$; (D+Q) (1982Sm01); |d=-0.1 {i1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1273.7 {I4}, I|g=12.5 {I5} (1982Sm01) 
$A{-2}=-0.26 {i10}, A{-4}=-0.51 {i14}. POL=+0.4 {I4} 
M$|g(|q) data in 1984Th07 suggesting (M1+E2) with |d=+1.9 {I4} are in conflict with those from 2006An31, the latter assigned E2 based on |g|g(|q)(DCO), asymmetry ratios and |g(lin pol) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1403.6 {I7}, I|g=34.7 {I15}; POL=-0.1 {I2} (1982Sm01) (this |g may be contaminated by a possible 1403-keV g.s. transition) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.007 {I33} or -3.7 {I+4-6}. No preference for the |d is given by the authors (2017Qu05). However, a value was given as -0.05 {I2} in Table II (2017Qu05) which is similar to the measured value in 1989Sc28: Phys.Rev. C40, 2310 (1989) 
 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR$Obtained by fixing |d=-1.9 {I1} for the 873|g in the fitting procedure. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00035 {I+3-2} (2017Qu05). The value given by authors is a factor of 10 larger than that calculated by the compiler 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from ({+3}He,2n|g). Others: -1.2 {I+4-5} from {+63}Cu(p,2n|g), -5.1 {I+29-34} from ({+6}Li,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3}, pol=+0.7 {I2} 
$ Branching ratios: I|g(1805)/I|g(851)=44 2/56 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.6 to -1.7 
$A{-2}=-0.37 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I3}, pol=+0.25 {I7} 
$ Branching ratios: I|g(580)/I|g(1431)=42 2/58 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ Branching ratios: I|g(557):I|g(938):I|g(359)::56 6:38 6:6 3 
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}, pol=+0.63 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3}, pol=+0.7 {I3} 
$ Branching ratios: I|g(1202)/I|g(843)=45 2/55 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-2.5 {I+20-17} for 5+ to 4+; +0.02 {I+2-4} for 5- to 4+ 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4}, pol=+0.95 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-1.8 {I+16-18} for 7+ to 6+; +0.02 {I+2-5} for 7- to 6+ 
$A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3}, pol=+0.8 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2,E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) and RUL 
M$|d(E2/M1)=-0.31 {I4} for 5 to 5. |d(M3/E2)=-0.05 {I+4-3} for 7 to 5 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3}, pol=+0.7 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-4.8 {I+26-25} for transition between opposite parity states; -4.3 {I+22-30} if the parities are the same 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I5}, pol=-0.1 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2,E2
decay_comment:
M$|d(E2/M1)=+2.8 {I+41-23} for 6 to 5. |d(M3/E2)=+0.5 {I+101-6} for 7 to 5 
$A{-2}=+0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3}, pol=+0.3 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$ from |g(|q) and RUL 
M$|d(E2/M1)=-0.41 {I+17-6} for 7 to 7. |d(M3/E2)=-0.07 {I+22-6} for 9 to 7 
$A{-2}=-0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, pol=+0.7 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ weakly influenced by the presence of 1808|g from {+26}Mg 
RI$ other: I|g(1805)/I|g(851)=0.67 {I10} (1973Ku05) 
$ EG=1805.1, IG=7.0 9 (1973Ku05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=953.7 2 (2006Hy02) 
RI$ others: 0.086 {I9} (2008Be21), 0.0809 {I33} (2006Hy02), 0.11 {I4} (2005Ca06), 0.120 {I21} (2003Hy02), 0.12 {I3} (2002Bl17), 0.106 {I17} (Doring: ENAM-2001 conference proceedings, p323, 2000DoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Placed above 953.9 level in 1997Fu08 to define a level at 3784. {I1557}-1073-913 cascade was proposed to feed the 3784 level. 1072-2833-1557 cascade feeds the 3586 level in 1998Sv01. No 913|g was reported by 1998Sv01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.11 {I7} 
$ B(E2)(W.u.): deduced by the evaluators. B(E2)(eff)(W.u.)=0.011 {I3} listed in 2010Al28 is a misprint 
RI$ |g not observed in 2010Al28, intensity taken from I|g(2803)/I|g(1849)=6 {I4}/72 {I6} (2008Fi07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$ this |g not seen in 2010Al28, but included in the analysis of transition probabilities using an upper limit of intensity deduced from detection sensitivity. Evaluators assign I|g<2 based on quoted B(E2)(W.u.) value in 2010Al28 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<0.015 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$ -0.07 {I12} quoted in text is a misprint (as per email of 6 Nov 2010 from M. Albers, first author of 2010Al28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from (851|g)(954|g)(|q) (2020Ma59), in exact agreement with |d value from 1981Wa09 (J. Phys. G7, 815) in {+58}Ni({+6}Li,np|g) reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 193.0 {I2} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 192.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 192.9 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 192.94 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
M$also supported by ce data in (p,n|g) (1967Me18); |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 
MR$weighted average of -0.08 {I+3-4} (1982Pa01), -0.07 {I3} (1968Bi03), 0.4 {I1} (1967Me18), 0.3 {I2} (1978Me17) in (p,n|g), and -0.03 {I2} (1978Me17), -0.07 {I3} (1968Bi03) in (|a,n|g). Other: +0.07 {I3} (1978Mu02) in (|a,n|g) has opposite sign; -2.5 {I+2-3} (1982Pa01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 247.9 {I2} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 248.4 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 247.84 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.044 {I+14-9} if M1; pure E2 is ruled out since it would require B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2|*10{+3} +4-3 exceeding RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 627.1 {I2} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 627.0 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 627.10 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 389.8 {I7} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 389.4 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 389.26 {I9} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 3.4 {I17} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 4.4 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 4.2 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 637.0 {I2} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 637.1 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 637.04 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g) 
MR$other: -0.09 {I18} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 457.9 {I6} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 456.9 {I5} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 457.4 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 457.19 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 12.3 {I32} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 17.3 {I8} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 11.6 {I4} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 17.1 {I14} from (|a,n|g), and 15.5 {I11} from (p,n|g) 
MR$other: +0.07 {I6} or 1.5 {I+3-2} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 650.0 {I2} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 649.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 650.2 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 650.14 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I6} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 100 {I5} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 100 {I4} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), and 100.0 {I14} from (|a,n|g) 
MR$other: -0.75 {I18} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$; pure E2 is ruled out since it would require B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2|*10{+3} +4-3 exceeding RUL=300 
E$unweighted average of 373.5 {I1} from (|a,n|g) and 373.06 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$others: -0.3 {I+2-3} or 1.7 {I+6-8} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$other: 396.2 {I1} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 15.9 {I11} from (|a,n|g) and 16.8 {I13} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 775.5 {I1} from (|a,n|g) and 775.43 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 74 {I6} from (|a,n|g) and 71 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$others: +0.00 {I8} or -1.7 {I+3-4} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$other: 1023.2 {I2} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 84 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 69.6 {I34} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$others: +0.8 {I+9-7} from (p,n|g); -0.4 {I2} or -1.5 {I5} from 1978Me17 in (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 413.3 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 413.5 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 413.2 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 17.2 {I8} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 22.2 {I19} from (|a,n|g), and 28.2 {I20} from (p,n|g). Other: 55.8 {I31} from ({+16}O,2pn|g) is greatly discrepant with others. 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$others: -0.17 {I3} or -2.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 870.3 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 870.8 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 870.25 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 25.6 {I13} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 22.2 {I10} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 14.2 {I10} from (|a,n|g), and 24.2 {I14} from (p,n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 
MR$others: +0.58 {I4} or +3.5 {I3} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1063.2 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1064.1 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 1063.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I6} from ({+16}O,2pn|g) and 100.0 {I25} from (p,n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 415.0 {I13} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay 
RI$weighted average of 13 {I8} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay and 4.2 {I5} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1065.2 {I4} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 1065.9 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 1065.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I20} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 100 from (|a,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.076 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<116 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 5.9 {I6} from (|a,n|g) and 4.7 {I4} from (p,n|g). Other: 20.5 {I17} from ({+16}O,2pn|g) is greatly discrepant with others and considered as an outlier 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$other: -0.32 {I6} or -1.8 {I2} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1013.4 {I3} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1013.4 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 1013.45 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I5} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 100 {I9} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 100 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1206.4 {I3} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1206.8 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 1206.34 {I11} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 81 {I5} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 84 {I6} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 92 {I5} from (|a,n|g), and 109 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) and |g(|q,pol) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1036.3 {I2} from (|a,n|g) and 1036.34 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 58.1 {I32} from (|a,n|g) and 47.5 {I23} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1091.6 {I1} from (|a,n|g) and 1091.40 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100.0 {I34} from (|a,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$+0.39 {I5} or -4.3 {I12} from (|a,n|g) and -0.50 {I8} or 10 {I+19-4} from (p,n|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.025 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<36 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1284.0 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 1284.21 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 10.3 {I10} from (|a,n|g) and 11.4 {I9} from (p,n|g) 
MR$others: -0.75 {I+30-20} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 768.5 {I2} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 766.4 {I9} from (|a,n|g), and 768.36 {I12} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 51 {I6} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 90 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 27.6 {I17} from (p,n|g) 
MR$+0.37 {I+25-18} or |>3 from (p,n|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.17 {I+6-5} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.8|*10{+2} {I+19-15} exceeds RUL=300 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1147.0 {I8} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 1146.5 {I6} from (|a,n|g), and 1147.3 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 8.4 {I19} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 10 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 9.6 {I12} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0083 {I+33-20} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=10.8 {I+44-26} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1203.4 {I20} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 1201.5 {I5} from (|a,n|g), and 1202.8 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 6.5 {I33} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 8 {I6} from (|a,n|g), and 5.7 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0045 {I+17-11} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5.3 {I+21-13} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1395.4 {I3} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 1393.3 {I9} from (|a,n|g), and 1395.39 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I19} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay and 100.0 {I21} from (|a,n|g) 
MR$weighted average of 0.36 {I+14-10} from (|a,n|g) and +0.78 {I+45-33} fro (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1243.6 {I5} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1244.2 {I7} from (|a,n|g), and 1243.28 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
M$E2(+M3) from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g); M3 component ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.18 {I10} or -3.7 {I+10-20} from |g(|q) in 1982Pa01 in (p,n|g) for J=7/2; M2 and O components are ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1471.3 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 1472.0 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.18 {I3} from (|a,n|g) and +0.11 {I3} (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1664.0 {I6} from (|a,n|g) and 1664.8 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 33.3 {I13} from (|a,n|g) and 24.9 {I17} from (p,n|g) 
MR$E2(+M3) from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1054.6 {I9} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 1053.7 {I5} from (|a,n|g), and 1054.1 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9 {I5} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 6.8 {I34} from (|a,n|g), and 6.3 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0144 {I+40-34} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=22 {I+6-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1498.5 {I6} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 1498.6 {I3} from (|a,n|g), and 1498.3 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 11 {I6} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay, 6.8 {I34} from (|a,n|g), and 11.8 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$-0.2|<|d|<2.8 from (p,n|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0090 {I+23-20} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=6.9 {I+18-15} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1691.7 {I5} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay and 1691.6 {I4} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I19} from {+63}Ga |e+|b{++} decay and 100.0 {I12} from (|a,n|g) 
MR$others: -0.19 {I6} or -2.0 {I3} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 2.34 {I11} from ({+16}O,2pn|g) and 1.1 {I4} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 496.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 496.6 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 496.56 {I12} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 17.2 {I9} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 12.1 {I7} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 17.7 {I12} from (|a,n|g), and 17.8 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
MR$other: -0.01 {I3} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 639.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 639.7 {I1} from (|a,n|g), and 639.64 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I5} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 100.0 {I21} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), and 100.0 {I15} from (p,n|g) 
M$D(+Q) with |d=0.00 {I2} from (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g); D with |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,2pn|g) and ({+18}O,|a3n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.39 {I27} from ({+16}O,2pn|g) and 1.6 {I4} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 798.2 {I3} from (|a,n|g) and 797.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 38.2 {I23} from (p,n|g) 
MR$weighted average of -0.03 {I2} from (|a,n|g) and -0.07 {I4} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1210.8 {I3} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I4} from (|a,n|g) 
M$E2(+M3) from (|a,n|g) and (p,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1668.5 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 1668.0 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 5.7 {I29} from (|a,n|g) and 25.0 {I33} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1327.3 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 1328.0 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 29.9 {I26} from (|a,n|g) and 35.7 {I33} from (p,n|g) 
M$E2(+M3) from (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1785.1 {I6} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 100.0 {I33} from (p,n|g) 
M$E2+M3 from (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 844.6 {I7} from (|a,n|g) and 844.1 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 42.9 {I29} from (|a,n|g) and 64 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.046 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<112 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from ({+18}O,|a3n|g). Others: 987.3 {I1} from (|a,n|g) and 987.1 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I5} from ({+16}O,2pn|g), 100 {I8} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), and 100 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$others: -0.20 {I4} or -2.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,2pn|g). Other: 1857.6 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 1857.5 {I5} in ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1858 in ({+16}O,2pn|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1530.0 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 1530.8 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 11.1 {I11} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant, which may stem from 1910|g not being recognized as a doublet by 1979Mu09 in (|a,n|g). 1982Pa01 in (p,n|g) state that only 30% of the total intensity of this doublet is from 2158 level and if all intensity is assigned to decay of 2158 level, the resulting branching would be close to that in 1979Mu09 
MR$other: |>0.4 from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1909.3 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 1910.4 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 100.0 {I33} from (p,n|g) 
MR$other: +1.7 {I+26-8} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1185.4 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 1184.8 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I4} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1599.5 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 40.9 {I28} from (|a,n|g) and 100 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
M$E2(+M3) from (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL. Other: D+Q from (p,n|g) for J(2249)=5/2,7/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0071 {I+29-22} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.4 {I+10-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1639.1 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 1638.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$-2.0 {I2} or -0.25 {I4} from (p,n|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.017 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)<11 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 1639.1 {I5} from (|a,n|g) could be a doublet consideing 2288+2291 is not resolved in (|a,n|g) (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.031 {I+14-9} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=20 {I+9-6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2041.9 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 2043.6 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
MR$weighted average of -0.6 {I3} from (|a,n|g) and -0.5 {I+3-5} from (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+18}O,|a3n|g). Other: 1255.6 {I4} from (|a,n|g) 
M$E2(+M3) from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 676.1 {I3} from (|a,n|g) and 674.9 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
MR$other: -0.53 {I5} (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 882.3 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) and 881.3 {I2} from (|a,n|g) 
M$E2+M2 from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL; E2 also from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 2441.6|g from (p,n|g) is a compiste peak of 2442+2443 as stated in 1982Pa01 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0024 {I+10-6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.70 {I+27-16} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1498.1 {I5} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) and 1497.2 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
MR$E2(+M3) from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g); M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1178.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1178.8 {I2} from ({+12}C,2pn|g), and 1177.7 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1582.0 {I1} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g), 1580.4 {I3} from ({+12}C,2pn|g), and 1584.1 {I6} from (|a,n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g), and |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 10.1 {I6} from ({+16}O,2pn|g) and 2.9 {I15} from ({+18}O,|a3n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q), not pure E1 or pure E2 from ce data in 1967Me18 
MR$from -0.08 {I+3-4} or -2.5 {I+2-3} (1982Pa01), with the smaller value adopted by the evaluator from comparisons with earlier values: -0.07 {I3} (1968Bi03), 0.4 {I1} (1967Me18), 0.3 {I2} (1978Me17) 
$K/(L+M)=7.41 {I11} (1967Me18) 
$|a{-K}(exp)=0.00886 {I45}, |a{-L+M}(exp)=0.00119 {I7} (1967Me18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I(818.2|g)/I(1065.2|g)=10/90 from 1978Me17, but this |g is not seen in any other studies. It is considered questionable by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.7 {I+13-5} for J=3/2, +0.50 {I14} or +7 {I+10-3} for J=5/2, |d(O/Q)=-0.18 {I10} or -3.7 {I+10-20} for J=7/2 (1982Pa01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Based on example |g with similar DCO values in 1998Si04, this |g should have Mult=Q with |DJ=2, but |DJ=1 is from the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Based on example |g with similar DCO values in 1998Si04, this |g should have Mult=D with |DJ=1, but |DJ=2 is from the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Based on example |g with similar DCO values in 1998Si04, this |g should have Mult=(D) with |DJ=(1), but |DJ=(2) is from the level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (p,n|g) by 1978Me17, but this |g is not seen in any other studies. It is considered questionable by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1243.5 {I2} (1978Me17) and 1244.9 {I4} (1979Mu09) 
RI$other: 95 from 1978Me17 
MR$others: -0.01 {I1} (1978Mu02), -1.2 {I2} (1978Me17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1978Me17 only with I|g=5. 1979Mu09 claim that a |g at this energy is seen in coincidence with |g rays in {+63}Cu and it is not seen in the n|g-coincidence spectrum of {+63}Zn. Based on those evidence, the evaluator has considered this |g as questionable. 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.03 {I12} or +2.9 {I8} (1978Me17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 496.6 {I1} (1978Me17) and 497.2 {I4} (1979Mu09) 
RI$other: 15 (1978Me17) 
MR$other: -0.02 {I3} (1978Me17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 798.3 {I2} (1978Me17) and 797.4 {I6} (1979Mu09) 
RI$other: 30 (1978Me17), 
MR$other: +0.8 {I1} (1978Me17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1210.7 {I2} (1978Me17) and 1211.5 {I5} (1979Mu09) 
RI$other: 50 (1978Me17) 
MR$other: -0.5 {I1} (1978Me17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1978Me17 with I|g=10; a similar |g is seen in 1979Mu09 but assigned to {+63}Cu based on n|g and |g|g-coin data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of 10 values from different datasets where uncertainties are given. This procedure increases the uncertainty in one of the discrepant values (991.16 {I4} in ({+28}Si,4p|g) E=115 MeV) from 0.04 keV to 0.15 keV. Regular weighted average is 991.37 {I7}, but with reduced |h{+2}=6.9, while unweighted average is 991.41 {I8}. Removal of the 991.16 {I4} value gives weighted average of 991.56 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of ten values. 
MR$from weighted average of -4.6 {I10} in (n,n'|g) (1985Ko42); -3.3 {I7} in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) (1978Si02); -5.5 {I40} in {+51}V({+16}O,p2n|g),{+59}Co({+7}Li,2n|g) (1977We10); and -4.5 {I15} (1964Se02) in (p,p'|g). Others: -1.3 {I3} (1978We15), -0.08 {I3} (1977We10), -0.45 {I5} (1977Al14) in {+51}V({+16}O,p2n|g), {+59}Co({+7}Li,2n|g); -0.57 {I+13-27} (1976Br12) in (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g). Evaluators prefer high value of |d(E2/M1) (dominant E2) for transition from the second 2+ to first 2+ from a trend in other even-even nuclei. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of ten values 
RI$NRM weighted average of ten values. Weighted average is 30.3 {I16}, but with reduced |h{+2}=15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$transition seen only in ce data from (p,p'|g) 
TI$I(ce+pair) 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=6.0 {I5}, X(E0/E2)=2.25 {I19}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.0038 {I4} (1985Pa07,1986Pa23,2005Ki02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$transition seen only in ce data from (p,p'|g) 
TI$I(pair+ce) 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.027 {I6}, X(E0/E2)=0.031 {I7}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.015 {I7} (1985Pa07,1986Pa23,2005Ki02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of eight values 
RI$weighted average of eight values. 
MR$Other: +1.7 {I5} or -0.2 {I3} (1977We10) in {+51}V({+16}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of three values with consistent I|g values 
RI$NRM weighted average of three values. Others: 23 {I6} (n,n'|g); 33 (p,p'|g); 42 {I4} in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; 154 {I13} in (p,|g) E=2098 keV are too high and in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
$|g from {+61}Ni(|a,n|g),{+56}Fe({+11}B,2np|g) only 
$B(E3)(W.u.) from B(E3)=0.040 {I7} ((e,e'),1976Ne06). Other: 70 {I50} from T{-1/2} and E3 |g branching 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of three values 
RI$from {+54}Fe,2p|g). Others: 120 {I13} (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g); 38 {I10} (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g); 24 {I6} (p,|g) E=2050 keV 
MR$from RUL(E2)<300. In (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) reaction, 1980Si02 quote |d=-1.2 {I2} but in a footnote also state that |d for this transition is not determined from experiment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of seven values 
MR$others: -0.4 {I1} (1978Ne02) in (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g), -0.54 {I12} (1978We15) in {+51}V({+16}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of seven values. Level-energy difference=2086.2 
RI$weighted average of four values. Others: 190 {I8} in ({+28}Si,4p|g) E=122 MeV; 113 {I9} in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g); 141 {I9} (p,|g) E=2025 keV are in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of two values 
RI$unweighted average of three values 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of two values 
MR$+9.4 {I15} or +0.40 {I5} (for J=3); +0.6 {I4} (for J=2) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of five values 
RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. Other three available values are either imprecise or in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of four values 
RI$in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) value is low by a factor of |?9 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of five values 
RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. Other three available values are either imprecise or in disagreement 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g not reported in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g). It is considered (by evaluators) as highly questionable since it involves M3 transition, with unrealistically large B(M3)(W.u.)=1.9|*10{+7} {I+7-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. This |g was reported in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; and in (p,p'|g), with I|g=24 in the latter work. It fits poorly in the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (p,|g) E=2050 keV. In several in-beam studies (1998Ga11,1994Cr05, 1978Ne02), a 1000|g deexcited a level at 4078, but in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g), 1980Si02 reported the placement from 4078 level as incorrect and placed it from 3307 level, as also proposed in (p,|g). In ({+28}Si,4p|g) study of 2004Ka18, a 999.9|g is placed from both the 3307 and 4078 levels. 
MR$from 1980Si02. Other: -0.1 {I2} (1978Ne02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|g reported in {+64}Ga |e decay only. 
$E|g and I|g data for four higher energy |g rays from the 3366 level have been taken from {+64}Ga |e decay. These are reported in other datasets, but with imprecise energies and intensities, as compared to the data in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. 
$This |g reported in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; and (p,p'|g) but with imprecise energies and intensities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. 
$This |g reported in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; (p,p'|g); and (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g), but with imprecise energies and intensities 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. 
$This |g reported in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; (p,|g) E=2098 keV; (p,p'|g); (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) and (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g), but with imprecise energies and intensities 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. 
$This |g reported in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; (p,|g) E=2098 keV; (p,p'|g); (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) and (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g), but with imprecise energies and intensities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g); (p,|g) E=2050 keV; and (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. Other: I|g: 71 {I5} in (p,|g) E=2.05 MeV. Tentative |g also reported in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. |g reported in (p,|g) E=2098 keV 
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1; B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+64}Ga |e decay. |g reported in (p,|g) E=2050 keV; (p,|g) E=2098 keV; (p,p'|g); (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) and (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g), but with imprecise energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g reported only in (p,|g) E=2.098 keV as the strongest transition from a 3458 level. The placement is considered tentative by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|g reported in ({+11}B,2np|g). This |g may correspond to a 1245|g (unplaced) in (p,p'|g) and a 1247.2 {I2} (unplaced) in (p,|g) E=2050 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g reported in (p,|g) E=2.098 keV. Evaluators treat this |g as highly questionable as |DJ|p requires mult=E4 and an unrealistic large B(E4)(W.u.)<2.1|*10{+6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1978We15 in {+51}V({+16}O,p2n|g) 
$RUL(M2)=1 for B(M2)(W.u.) suggests T{-1/2}(3924.7 level) not lower than |?0.7 ps 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$<39 from 2004Ka18 in ({+28}Si,4p|g). Others: 33 {I5} (1994Cr05), 77 {I19} (1998Ga11), 127 {I21} (1978Ne02) in (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g) where a 999.7 {I3} |g was assigned from only the 4077 level. But 1980Si02 in (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) do not support the placement of this |g from 4077 level, based on the absence of (1000|g)(771|g) coincidences 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$26 {I4} (1994Cr05,2004Ka18), 100 {I19} (1998Ga11). But this |g was not detected by 1980Si02 in (|a,n|g) and ({+11}B,2np|g), the authors gave an upper limit of 0.1 for branching ratio. Placement or existence of 1773.2 {I10} |g in 2004Ka18 is considered uncertain 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0014 {I4}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.8 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g from ({+28}Si,4p|g) study of 2004Ka18 only. It is treated as uncertain due to poor fit in level scheme (level-energy difference gives 1930.0) and non-observation in other |g-ray studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=2 |g from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g),(HI,xn|g) (1978Ne02) and DCO ratio (1994Cr05) in ({+54}Fe,2p|g). 2004Ka18, in (p,|g) E=122 MeV, propose |DJ=1 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g(anisotropy) ratio, but their results seem consistent with |DJ=2 also. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of two values 
RI$from ({+54}Fe,2p|g). Other: 55 {I3} in ({+28}Si,4p|g) E=115 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=991.6 {I1}, I|g=100 (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=992.03, I|g=100,, I|g(absolute)=48.0 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=991.51 {I10}, I|g=100 (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=991.0 {I5} in text, I|g=100, I|g(absolute)=48.6 (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=992.2 {I5}, I|g=100 {I3} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=808.0 {I1}, I|g=30.7 {I18} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=808.40, I|g=31.9, I|g(absolute)=15.3 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=807.85 {I10}, I|g=31.6 {I5} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=807.8 {I5}, I|g=27.8 {I4}, I|g(absolute)=13.5 {I2} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=809.4 {I4}, I|g=32 {I2} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1799.7 {I2}, I|g=9.11 {I64} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1800.29, I|g=8.3, I|g(absolute)=4.0 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1799.43 {I15}, I|g=8.3 {I3} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1799.2 {I5}, I|g=8.6 {I8}, I|g(absolute)=4.2 {I4} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=1798 {I4}, I|g=12 {I3} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2007Mi12. Other: E|g=110.9 from ce data (1985Pa07,1983Pa05). I|g=0.50 {I5} from I|g(111|g)/I|g(919|g)=0.027 {I3} in (p,p'|g) data (1985Pa07,1983Pa05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=918.9 {I1}, I|g=17.4 {I11} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=919.40, I|g=17.7, I|g(absolute)=8.6 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=918.78 {I10}, I|g=18.7 {I4} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=918.5 {I5}, I|g=16.7 {I4}, I|g(absolute)=8.1 {I2} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=919.1 {I4}, I|g=17 {I2} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1618.0 {I2}, I|g=3.72 {I25} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1618.47, I|g=3.75, I|g(absolute)=1.8 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1617.54 {I20}, I|g=3.81 {I19} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1617.2 {I8}, I|g=3.7 {I10}, I|g(absolute)=1.8 {I5} (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1276.4 {I1}, I|g=13.5 {I10} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1276.94, I|g=13.3, I|g(absolute)=6.4 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1276.37 {I10}, I|g=12.9 {I3} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1276.4 {I5}, I|g=13.0 {I6}, I|g(absolute)=6.3 {I3} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=1276.6 {I20}, I|g=13 {I3} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1387.4 {I1}, I|g=26.5 {I23} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1387.83, I|g=26.7, I|g(absolute)=12.8 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1387.27 {I10}, I|g=27.3 {I7} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1386.8 {I5}, I|g=28.8 {I8}, I|g(absolute)=14.0 {I4} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=1387.8 {I14}, I|g=30 {I3} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=2195.1 {I2}, I|g=21.9 {I21} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2195.85, I|g=20.2, I|g(absolute)=9.7 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2195.25 {I10}, I|g=21.4 {I5} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2195.0 {I7}, I|g=23.0 {I10}, I|g(absolute)=11.2 {I5} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=2195.6 {I9}, I|g=26 {I4} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=3186.8{I2}, I|g=0.47 {I8} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=3188.9, I|g=0.27, I|g(absolute)=0.13 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=3187 {I2}, I|g=0.35 {I10} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=3189 {I2}, I|g|<0.9 (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from |g|g-coin data in 2007Mi12 
$This |g fits poorly in the decay scheme, E|g not used in the least-squares fitting procedure. Level-energy difference=1462.5. In 1975Ra28 and 1990SuZR, it is possible that contribution from background line near this energy from {+40}K decay is not fully subtracted 
$E|g=1461.3 {I1}, I|g<0.21 (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1461.56, I|g=0.81, I|g(absolute)=0.39 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1462 {I2}, I|g=0.70 {I10} (1975Ra28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2270.2 {I2}, I|g=4.87 {I54} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2271.08, I|g=4.58, I|g(absolute)=2.2 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2270.42 {I10}, I|g=4.84 {I24} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2270.4 {I9}, I|g=4.3 {I6}, I|g(absolute)=2.1 {I3} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=2272 {I2}, I|g=4 {I2} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_comment:
$E|g=3261.7 {I2}, I|g=0.31 {I2} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=3262.97, I|g=0.31, I|g(absolute)=0.15 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=3261 {I2}, I|g=0.27 {I8} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=3264, I|g|<1 (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=756.6 {I1}, I|g=2.77 {I19} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=757.07, I|g=2.92, I|g(absolute)=1.4 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=756.52 {I20}, I|g=2.90 {I15} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=756.7 {I7}, I|g=2.9 {I2}, I|g(absolute)=1.4 {I1} (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1455.9 {I1}, I|g=4.5 {I3} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1454.95, I|g=4.38, I|g(absolute)=2.1 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1455.59 {I20}, I|g=4.33 {I22} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1455.2 {I7}, I|g=4.5 {I4}, I|g(absolute)=2.2 {I2} (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1566.7 {I2}, I|g=4.65 {I36} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1567.19, I|g=4.38, I|g(absolute)=2.21 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1566.47 {I20}, I|g=4.82 {I23} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1566.5 {I6}, I|g=5.6 {I6}, I|g(absolute)=2.7 {I3} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=1568 {I2}, I|g=11 {I4} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=2374.2 {I2}, I|g=16.2 {I14} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2375.27, I|g=15.8, I|g(absolute)=7.6 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2374.32 {I10}, I|g=16.2 {I4} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2374.8 {I7}, I|g=15.8 {I10}, I|g(absolute)=7.7 {I5} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=2374.7 {I14}, I|g=14 {I3} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of values from 2007Mi12, 1975Ra28 and 1967Ma04 
$E|g=3365.3 {I2}, I|g=31.5 {I34} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=3367.52, I|g=32.3, I|g(absolute)=15.5 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=3365.87 {I10}, I|g=30.4 {I12} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=3365.8 {I9}, I|g=33.7 {I10}, I|g(absolute)=16.4 {I5} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=3366.9 {I16}, I|g=36 {I4} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from 2007Mi12, 1975Ra28 and 1967Ma04 
$E|g=1626.0 {I2}, I|g=2.49 {I17} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1626.49, I|g=2.29, I|g(absolute)=1.1 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1625.74 {I20}, I|g=2.42 {I17} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1626.2 {I12}, I|g=2.7 {I6}, I|g(absolute)=1.3 {I3} (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from 2007Mi12, 1975Ra28 and 1967Ma04 
$E|g=2433.6 {I2}, I|g=1.26 {I12} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2434.4, I|g=1.29, I|g(absolute)=0.62 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2433.7 {I3}, I|g=1.36 {I13} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2433.5 {I15}, I|g=1.2 {I4}, I|g(absolute)=0.6 {I2} (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=3424.8 {I2}, I|g=10.1 {I10} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=3426.55, I|g=10.0, I|g(absolute)=4.8 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=3425.06 {I15}, I|g=9.4 {I5} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=3424.8 {I9}, I|g=10.1 {I8}, I|g(absolute)=4.9 {I4} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=3426.2 {I18}, I|g=10 {I1} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1185.4 {I1}, I|g<0.16 (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1186, I|g=0.23, I|g(absolute)=0.11 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1186.0 {I10}, I|g=0.26 {I6} (1975Ra28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1996.0 {I2}, I|g=3.93 {I34} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=1996.41, I|g=3.54, I|g(absolute)=1.7 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=1995.8 {I3}, I|g=3.69 {I22} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=1996.1 {I10}, I|g=3.9 {I6}, I|g(absolute)=1.9 {I3} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=1995.0 {I5}, I|g=12 {I4} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of values from 2007Mi12 and 1975Ra28 
$E|g=2803.1 {I2}, I|g=1.51 {I19} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2804.23, I|g=1.54, I|g(absolute)=0.74 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2803.7 {I3}, I|g=1.49 {I14} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2803.9 {I10}, I|g=2.5 {I6}, I|g(absolute)=1.2 {I3} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=2806 {I2}, I|g=1.5 {I9} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from 1975Ra28 
$E|g=3797.23, I|g=2.92, I|g(absolute)=1.4 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=3795.1 {I3}, I|g=2.83 {I17} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=3794.5 {I10}, I|g=2.1 {I4}, I|g(absolute)=1.0 {I2} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=3795 {I2}, I|g=1.4 {I4} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=2544.4 {I2}, I|g=0.30 {I6} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2545.02, I|g=0.44, I|g(absolute)=0.21 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2544.2 {I10}, I|g=0.40 {I8} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2550 {I2}, I|g=2 {I2} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=2655.2 {I2}, I|g=0.51 {I7} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2655.96, I|g=0.71, I|g(absolute)=0.34 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2654.4 {I10}, I|g=0.65 {I10} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2654, I|g<0.6, I|g(absolute)<0.3 (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from 1975Ra28 
$E|g=4455.88, I|g=2.02 (1990SuZR), I|g(absolute)=0.97 
$E|g=4454.3 {I10}, I|g=1.72 {I10} (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=4453.5 {I12}, I|g=1.0 {I2}, I|g(absolute)=0.5 {I1} (1967Ma04) 
$E|g=4456.8 {I16}, I|g=2.1 {I5} (1967Ko02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1975Ra28 
$E|g=4610.60, I|g=0.13, I|g(absolute)=0.06 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=4609 {I2}, I|g|?0.07 (1975Ra28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2103.6 {I2}, I|g=0.35 {I9} (2007Mi12) 
$E|g=2103.1, I|g=0.40, I|g(absolute)=0.19 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2103 {I2}, I|g=0.35 {I8} (1975Ra28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Ra28 
RI$from 1990SuZR. Other: <0.4 (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2915.21, I|g=0.02, I|g(absolute)=0.01 (1990SuZR) 
$E|g=2913 {I2}, I|g<0.4 (1975Ra28) 
$E|g=2910, I|g=0.4 (1967Ma04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$rounded off value. E|g=807.67 {I1} quoted (1994Cr05) in table 2 and 808.0 in figure 3 
$I|g=18.10 {I3} (1994Cr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$rounded off value. E|g=641.36 {I4} quoted (1994Cr05) in table 2 and 641.3 in figure 3 
$I|g=18.4 {I1} (1994Cr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.8 {I1} (1994Cr05) 
E,RI$doublet. Energy from level energy difference and intensity from |g|g coin 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$from thickness of arrow in figure 1 of 2004Ka18, the evaluators estimate that about 60% intensity is from 2306 level and about 40% from 5951 level. 
$ R{-ac}=1.12 {I4}, R{-aa}=1.39 {I3} for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R{-aa}=0.92 {I3} for doublet 
$From (|a,n|g),({+11}B,2np|g) (1980Si02), this placement of 999.9|g is suspect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$in the Adopted dataset, this |g ray is placed from a different level near 6124 keV with J|p=(9-) 
$ R{-ac}=0.90 {I24}, R{-aa}=1.01 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. E|g=2219 given in figure 1 of 2004Ka18 does not fit; |g not listed in authors' table I 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1980Si02. In 1978Si02, value was 96.4 {I10}, as the 430-keV transition was reported later in 1980Si02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$misprinted as 42 {I3} in Table 1 of 1978Si02 as per authors' discussion in text for the 3305 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$misprinted as 32 {I2} in Table 1 of 1978Si02 as per authors' discussion in text for the 3305 level. 
RI$see also comment for 1205.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1980Si02. Expected I|g|?9 from the Adopted Gammas 
MR$from RUL(E2)<300 (see Adopted Gammas). 1980Si02 give |d=-1.2 {I2} in Table 2, but it is in contradiction with a footnote in their table that |d for this transition is undetermined experimentally. In addition, no |g(|q) data for the 341|g are available in 1980Si02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1980Si02. Earlier value was 53 {I3} in 1978Si02 where 341|g was not reported 
$Note that the sign of A{-4} should be negative for stretched E2, probably a misprint in the Table 1 of 1978Si02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2193.0 listed in Table 1 of 1980Si02 fits poorly. In authors' Table 2, level-scheme Fig. 1 and text value is 2195 keV. Evaluators assume that the value is a misprint in Table 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$Sign of A{-2} disagrees with positive sign expected for stretched E2. 924|g peak contaminated by contribution from {+62}Cu 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$with the placement of a 999|g from this level, the branching ratio of this transition is reduced by about 50% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement of 1295|g to 1910, 0+ level highly questionable as required mult=[M3] inconsistent with RUL for M3 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from branching ratio of 45%, with placement from 3369.7 level (1975Di11). Placement from the 3367 level proposed by evaluators based on the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce data (1985Pa07) 
TI$from Ice(K)(1910)/Ice(K)(918)=6.0 {I5} (1985Pa07) and Ice(K)(1910)/I(pair)=0.46 {I7} (1985Pa07,1986Pa19) 
$X(E0/E2)=2.30 {I25}, |r{+2}=0.0039 {I4} (1985Pa07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce data (1985Pa07) 
TI$from I(pair)(2610)/I|g(1617|g)=0.000027 {I6} (1985Pa07) and Ice/I(pair)(theory)|?0.10 
$|r{+2}=0.008 {I3} (1985Pa07) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.03 {I1} (1985Pa07,1986Pa23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from 1966Va19. Not reported by 1975An20. 1800.5 and 1802|g probably form a doublet 
RI$comparison of branching ratio from 1800 level does not leave any intensity which could be assigned to 2793 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=17.6 {I26} (1977We10). E|g=807, I|g=15.2 {I16} (1977Al14) 
MR$from 1978We15. Others: -5.5 {I40} or -0.8 {I3} (1977We10), -0.45 {I5} (1977Al14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=1.7 {I5} (1977We10). E|g=430, I|g=1.8 {I3} (1977Al14) 
MR$+1.7 {I5} or -0.2 {I3} (1977We10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=13.3 {I20} (1977We10). E|g=1618, I|g=6.3 {I13} (1977Al14) 
MR$from 1978We15. Others: -5.4 {I7} (1977We10), +0.1 (1977Al14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=3.2 {I10} (1977We10). E|g=399, I|g=3.2 {I6} (1977Al14) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.3 {I3} (1977We10), 0.00 {I3} (1977Al14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=20.9 {I13} (1977We10). E|g=642, I|g=18.3 {I18} (1977Al14) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.01 {I3} (1978We15), -0.2 {I3} (1977We10), 0.00 {I3} (1977Al14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=745, I|g=2.7 {I8}. This |g from 4981 level is reported by 1977Al14 only. Evaluators consider its placement doubtful and do not include in the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Relative I|g=11.1 {I17} (1977We10). E|g=1046, I|g=4.3 {I13} (1977Al14) 
$|d(E2/M1)=+7.5 {I15} (1977We10) for 8- to 7- transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=937.1, I|g=25.0 (1976Ch11) 
$|d(O/Q)=-0.04 {I6} for J(2736)=4, +2.5 {I3} for J(2736)=2 (1978Ne02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$E|g=2006.8, I|g=16.5 (1976Ch11) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.2 {I1} or -1.9 {I6} for J(2999)=3; -1.3 {I+5-30} for J(2999)=2 (1978Ne02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$E|g=1387.6, I|g=6.0 (1976Ch11) 
RI$I|g(1388|g)/I|g(1278|g) low by a factor of |?8 when compared to that in other reactions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=-0.1 {I2} (1978Ne02) 
$Assignment from 4077 level (1978Ne02) shown to be incorrect by 1980Si02. But in later in-beam studies (2004Ka18,1998Ga11,1994Cr05) 1000|g is shown to deexcite the 4077 level also. It should be noted that A{-2}=-0.46 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I15} (1978Ne02) for 999|g are in disagreement with A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I4} from 1980Si02. So it is possible that there are two different |g rays near this energy. But the absence of 1000|g from 4077 level in ({+11}B,2np|g) (1980Si02) is inexplicable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|d(O/Q)=+0.04 {I4} for J(4236)=6; |d(Q/D)=+0.5 {I+3-2} for J(4236)=5, -0.2 to +1.2 for J(4236)=4 (1978Ne02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Multipolarity, |d: pure E2. |d(E2+M3)<0.27 from |a(K)exp in {+65}Cu(p,n|g) but |d(E2+M3)<0.0001 from RUL for B(M3)(W.u.)<10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR -2.33 {I20} from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g) 
RI from (p,n|g); from (|a,pn|g) I|g(657): I|g(749): I|g(864)=0.7 {I2}: 11.9 {I24}: 100 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)/(|a(L)+|a(M))=5.6 {I6} (1969Ba37). 
|a(K)/(|a(L)+|a(M))|?3.8 and Ice/I|b{++}(total)=0.1 (1957Da07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E placed by 1972Nu02. An alternative placement from a proposed 1524 level has been suggested by 1972Ba42. 
RI from 1972Du03. I|g=0.007 {I7} (1972Nu02), 0.10 {I2} (suggesting possible contamination, 1972Ba42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$E|g=849.7 in 2001Mu24 is a misprint. According to e-mail reply (July 5/01) from one of the authors (R. Bhowmik), it should be 839.7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from adopted levels. E|g=53.8 {I2} reported in 1974Ni01 was probably taken from previous work. 
RI not measured (1974Ni01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E reported in 1974Ni01 but probably assumed from other work ({Ie.g.}, {+65}Ga |e decay) since no 61|g is reported in other {+62}Ni(|a,n|g) data. 
RI not measured (1974Ni01). 
MR +0.07 {I5} or -2.0 {I3} from analysis of |g(|q) and prediction of alignment from compound nuclear statistical model (1975We08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E reported in 1974Ni01 (|DE(|g) not given) but |g probably assumed from other work ({Ie.g.} {+65}Ga |e decay) since no 92|g is reported in other {+62}Ni(|a,n|g) data. 
RI not measured (1974Ni01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%branching: 86 {I2} (1978Ne02) in agreement with I|g values. %branching=77 {I1} from 1978Ko11. 
MR -2.17 {I4} (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI estimated from branchings (1978Ko11) and I|g(909.5) (1974Ni01). 
%branching: 23 {I1} (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI estimated from branchings (1978Ko11) and I|g(909.5) (1974Ni01). 
%branching: 22 {I1} (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E member of an unresolved |g doublet (1974Ni01). 
RI estimated from branchings (1978Ko11) and I|g(932.1) (1974Ni01). 
%branching: 38 {I2}, estimated from |g|g coincidence spectra (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
%branching: 95 {I1}, (1977Lo03), 84 {I4} (1978Ne02). 
MR +0.04 {I2} (1978Ne02), +0.00 {I1} (1977Lo03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
E a 1066|g is reported in 1977Lo03. E|g is from level energy difference. 
RI estimated from I|g(201) (1974Ni01) and branchings (1977Lo03,1978Ne02). 
%branching: 5 {I1}, (1977Lo03), 16 {I4} (1978Ne02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E member of an unresolved |g doublet (1974Ni01). 
RI estimated from branchings (1978Ko11) and I|g(484.0) (1974Ni01). I|g<18 (1974Ni01). 
%branching: 61 {I4} (1978Ko11), estimated from |g|g coincidence spectra. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E member of an unresolved |g doublet (1974Ni01) or |g triplet (1978Ko11). 
RI estimated from branchings (1978Ko11) and I|g(484.0) (1974Ni01). I|g<9.0 (1974Ni01). 
%branching: 20 {I4}, estimated from |g|g coincidence spectra (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E E|g=395 {I3} from |g|g coincidence spectra (1974Ni01). 
RI estimated from branchings (1978Ko11) and I|g(1263.4) (1974Ni01). 
%branching: 7 {I1} (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E member of an unresolved |g triplet (1978Ko11). 
%branching: 15 {I1}, estimated from |g|g coincidence spectra (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E estimated by evaluators from level energy differences and uncertainties in 1978Ko11. 
%branching: 10 {I1} (1978Ko11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E 1071.7 {I3} reported in 1974Ni01, but possibly includes some 1069|g from the 2135 level. 
MR +0.67 {I5} (1977Lo03), +0.84 {I10} (1978Ne02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E member of an unresolved |g doublet (1974Ni01); member of a triplet (1978Ne02) 
M |g(|q) and polarization of this complex line were consistent with an E2 assignment (1974Ni01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from a weighted average of the two |a(K)exp values 
E from 1958Ch34. E|g=115.2, uncertainty not given (1977Ch14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from a weighted average of the two |a(K)exp values 
Branching: from 1970We02, uncertainty not given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Branching: 26.2 {I17} (1974Ez01, recalculated to allow for the 9.7% (1253|g) branch). 
MR +0.02 {I3} or -4.5 {I8} (1974Ez01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g, branching: from 1974Ez01. 
|d(Q + O)=+0.1 {I+5-6} for J(1577)=5/2 and |d(D+Q)|>+0.46 for J(1577)=3/2 (1974Ez01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g, branching: from 1974Ez01. 
-7.1<|d(D+Q)<-0.8 for J(1577)=5/2 and |d(D+Q)=+1.2 {I+12-7} for J(1577)=3/2 (1974Ez01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q) in {+66}Cu |b{+-} decay; M1+E2 from RUL. 
MR From |g|g(|q) in {+66}Ga |e DECAY (2002Ga20). Other value: -1.9 {I3}, as given by 1974Kr16 from analysis of 1969Ha46 data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; 2372.2 from (p,p'|g) 
M from internal conversion data and absence of |g ray in (p,p'|g) 
TI for 100 transitions of 1333|g from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(n,n'|g); M1+E2 from |DJ|p 
MR from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); sign convention not specified 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E doublet. E|g is from level energy difference in {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g). E|g=312.8 from level energy difference in {+65}Cu(p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; 3107.0 from (p,p'|g) 
M from internal conversion data and absence of |g ray in (p,p'|g) 
TI for 100 transitions of 1234|g from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E placed as depopulating the 3213 level in {+65}Cu(p,|g), {+66}Zn(p,p'|g), {+66}Zn(n,n'|g) and by 1971Ca14, 1994En02 in {+66}Ga |e decay. Placed as depopulating a proposed level at 4047 by 1970Ph01 in |e decay, which level, however, is not observed by 1994En02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI from 1969Ha46; |g not shown in 1993Mi13 decay scheme. G-ray spectrum measured up to 1400 keV. No search for 1872-keV G ray (1993Mi13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp+|a(L)exp=4.3|*10{+-4} {I6} (1960Sc06) 
M D+Q from |g|g(|q); M1,E2 from ce data (1960Sc06) 
MR Other value: -1.9 {I3} (1974Kr16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp+|a(L)exp=0.38|*10{+-4} {I5} (1960Sc06) 
M D+Q from |g|g(|q); M1+E2 from ce data (1960Sc06) 
MR Other values: -0.09 {I3} or +3.5 {I4}, |g|g(|q) (1960Sc06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; unresolved doublet (1977Ne04) 
RI from I|g(892) and branching ratio from 1977Ne04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference; unresolved doublet (1977Ne04) 
RI from I|g(628) and branching ratio from 1977Ne04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(1026) and branching ratio from 1977Ne04 
|d(M2/E1)=-0.00 {I8} (1977Ne04); -0.045 from |g(|q) (1975Br25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E this placement from 1985Ko27 agrees with {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g) data. 1976SmZU show this |g deexciting 3577 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E this placement from 1985Ko27 agrees with {+64}Ni(|a,2n|g) data. 1976SmZU place this |g deexciting the 3670 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI from the E0 pair production branching ratio I(e|+)(2372|g)/I(1331|g)=5.7|*10{+-5} {I11} (1985Pa07) and the ce(K)(2372|g)/I(e|+)(2372|g)=0.146 from theory (1986PaZM). The K conversion to pair production ratio has been increased by 10% to allow for L conversion. |r{+2}(E0)>0.2|*10{+-3}; B(E0; 2372|g)/B(E2; 1333|g)=0.047 {I8} (1985Pa07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from 1969Ho33, uncertainty not given. 
RI calculated from branching ratios (1969Ho33) and I|g(1789). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI from the E0 pair production branching ratio I(e|+)(3107|g)/I(1234|g)=2.3|*10{+-4} {I5} (1985Pa07) and the ce(K)(3107|g)/I(e|+)(3107|g)=0.043 from theory (1986PaZM). The K conversion to pair production ratio has been increased by 10% to allow for L conversion. B(E0,3107|g)/B(E2,2068|g)=5.0 {I12} (1985Pa07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0133 {I24} (2006Le24). B(E2)=0.0278 {I11} from T{-1/2}(2451 level)=0.76 ps {I14} (2003Ko51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from method 1 in 2019Sm03. 
$|d=-2.078 {I42}, A{-2}=+0.271 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.265 {I2} (method 1). 
$|d=-2.073 {I39}, A{-2}=+0.272 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.258 {I10} (method 2) 
$|d=-2.072 {I46}, A{-2}=+0.272 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.257 {I12} (method 3) 
$|d=-2.073 {I46}, A{-2}=+0.271 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.256 {I12} (method 4) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=+1.16 {I4} (method 2) 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=+1.16 {I4} (method 3) 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=+1.16 {I4} (method 4) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from method 1 in 2019Sm03. 
$|d=-0.0822 {I24}, A{-2}=-0.156 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.0051 {I3} (method 1). 
$|d=-0.0819 {I27}, A{-2}=-0.156 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I5} (method 2) 
$|d=-0.0828 {I36}, A{-2}=-0.155 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I6} (method 3) 
$|d=-0.0828 {I36}, A{-2}=-0.155 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I6} (method 4) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in (|a,n|g) 
B(M2)(W.u.) and B(E3)(W.u.) calculated for |d=0.54 
MR from RUL; 1.4 {I+23-6} from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR -0.09 {I28} or +8.0 {I18} from |g(|q) in {+67}Ga |e decay 
M (M1+E2), from |g(|q) in {+67}Ga |e decay and |DJ|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from |a(K)exp+|a(L1)exp=1.72|*10{+-2} {I10}(1966Fr12) 
Probability of K-capture=0.89 {I4} (1988Be55); assuming a coefficient of K-fluorescence=0.430 {I7} (1972Bb16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from 1973Ba54 
Probability of K-capture=0.88 {I3} (1988Be55); assuming a coefficient of K-fluorescence=0.430 {I7} (1972Bb16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR unweighted average of +6.0 {I7} (1978Lo06) and +5.0 {I8} (1978Du04); other: +4.0 {I+2-5} (1974Ni01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 37 (1978Du04); since this |g appears as a closely spaced doublet 1989.9 {I3} |g ray, the uncertainty was added by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E assigned by 1977SmZH to a 999 level not seen in any other experiment; later assigned to the 1604 level by 1982Ko35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E assigned by 1977SmZH to 2732 level; assignment changed to 2103 level by the same authors in 1982Ko35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E this |g ray assigned to 2928.5 level by 1977SmZH; however, such placement implies 3 |g rays from 2828.5 level to 13/2-,3/2-,3/2- levels which is unlikely. This |g ray is assigned to the 2174.5 level as seen in (|a,n|g) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E assigned by 1977SmZH to 2242 level; assignment changed to 2454 level by the same authors in 1982Ko35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$determined by comparison of the 93.31|g intensity to that of 4 other lines in {+67}Ga |e decay (2023Si17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 65 {I3} from (n,|g), E=thermal and 68.9 {I17} from {+68}Ga |e decay 
MR$from {+68}Ga |e decay. Others: -1.45 {I15} from (n,|g), E=thermal and -1.5 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$unweighted av of -0.22 {I5} from (n,|g), -0.15 {I2} from {+68}Ga |e decay and -0.15 {I2} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g), E2 from comparison to RUL. 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=-0.05 {I6} from |g|g(|q) in (n,|g),E=thermal and +0.02 {I+5-2} from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). From RUL, one expects |d<2.4|*10{+7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+68}Ga |e decay. Others: +0.24 {I13} from (n,|g) and +0.15 {I5} from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g), |D|p=yes from level scheme 
MR$from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$from {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g), |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M3)
decay_comment:
E$from {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 
M$Q+O from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g), |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 
M$Q+O from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g), |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from ce (1972Sl03). 
M$from |a(exp) (1972Sl03). 
TI$includes pair production. From relative ce intensities of 1972Sl03, the I|g of 1973La01 and the theoretical calculations of 1986PaZM for the K conversion to pair production ratio. The K conversion has been increased by 10% to allow for L conversion. 
$Ice(K)(1659)/Ice(K)(1077|g)=0.010 {I2} (1972Sl03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I12}. 
MR$-0.07 {I10} for J|p(3287)=1+ and +0.63 {I+22-37} for J|p=2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=0.19 {I6} 
RI$deduced from total I|g=0.31 {I14} for doublet and branching of 3429 level in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=0.37 {I9} 
RI$deduced from total I|g=1.22 {I19} for doublet and branching of 3666 level in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=1.5 {I4} 
$I|g=0.46 {I4} 
RI$deduced from total I|g=3.2 {I5} for doublet and branching of 3815 level in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=2.8 {I12} 
$I|g=0.20 {I3} 
RI$derived from I|g data of 1976SmZU and |s(|q) for 1724|g. |s(|q)=2.4 {I5} for unresolved 2984|g and 2990|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=0.12 {I11} 
RI$deduced from total I|g=0.31 {I14} for doublet and branching of 3429 level in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=0.85 {I19} 
RI$deduced from total I|g=1.22 {I19} for doublet and branching of 3666 level in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=0.9 {ILT} 
RI$from |s(|q)=2.4 {I5} for unresolved 2984|g and 2990|g and deduced |s(|q) for 2984|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|s(|q)=1.7 {I6} 
RI$deduced from total I|g=3.2 {I5} for doublet and branching of 3815 level in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$includes also the weak 334|g. 
M$large statistical errors in |g(|q) fit make Q characterization tentative. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$from Ice(K)(1656)/I|g(578|g)=1.9|*10{+-4} {I6} and I(|g+ce)(1656)/Ice(K)(1656)=0.55. The authors adopt a branching of 4.2|*10{+-4} {I10} which is an average of their value and an earlier result from data in {+68}Ga |e decay, to derive B(E0) and |r{+2}(E0) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$From 1974HeYW 
ECC$0.054 {I3} (1968Sc08) 
RI$from I|g(1+ce)=100 and M4 |a. 
M$from |a(exp) (1968Sc08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$for 100 transitions of 185.9|g as measured in (p,p'|g) 
M$from internal conversion data in (p,p'|g) 
E$from (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not included in Adopted Gammas. Adopted J|p of initial and final levels would require E4 or M5 multipolarity for the transition. In addition, transition is not observed in {+70}Cu |b{+-} decay (6.6 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not included in Adopted Gammas. Transition is not observed in {+70}Cu |b{+-} decay or Coulomb excitation and such a placement would require an E3 or M4 transition which strongly violates RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$for 100 transition of 184|g 
M$from internal conversion data normalized to 184|g assumed to be E2 
$|r(E0)<0.05 obtained using the Adopted T{-1/2} of 3.90 ns {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$The adopted J{+|p} requires E3 or M4 for this transition. This transition depopulates another level in {+70}Zn(n,n') dataset. The evaluators adopted the {+70}Zn(n,n') placement for this transition in Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy in {+70}Zn(n,|g) (2015BaZY) 
$I|g(156|g from IT decay)/I|g(386.28|g from |b decay) |<5|*10{+-5} (1970Zo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.037 {I+14-8}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.3E2 +8-5 
E$weighted average of 489.7 {I4} from {+71}Cu |b{+-} decay and 490.4 {I5} from ({+238}U,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)|>0.99. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)|>42277, which exceeds RUL=300 by a very large factor, thus the transition is likely M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 674.8 {I3} from {+71}Cu |b{+-} decay and 674.3 {I8} from ({+238}U,X|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)|>0.13. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)|>417 which exceeds RUL=300, implying that the transition is likely dominant M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$ from {+72}Zn Adopted dataset in ENSDF database. Shifted value of E|g is 1184 keV {I2} in spectral figure 3 of 2013Lo04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0205 {I+12-17}(stat) {I21}(syst) (2023He06) 
$B(M1)=0.00072 {I+168-72}(stat) {I1}(syst) (2023He06). Using maximum and minimum bounds of M1 matrix element, compiler obtains B(M1)=0.00072 {I+90-72}. 
MR$deduced by compiler from E2 and M1 matrix elements in 2023He06, complier obtains -4.5 {I+315-|@}, or magnitude of |d>3 from ratios of E2 and M1 matrix elements, as well as from B(E2) ratios and branching ratios for the 1004.7-keV and 1657.6-keV transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E2)|_=0.0401 {I32} (2009Va01). This value is about the same as corresponding B(E2)|^ listed in 2007Va20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$cited by 2013Lo04 in their reference 43 (Thesis: T. Paul, University of Strasbourg, 2007). 1187 keV {I2} in spectral figure 3 of 2013Lo04 is the shifted energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E2 matrix element (606, 2+ to g.s., 0+)=+0.419 eb {I10} (2023Il02) 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)=0.0351 {I+17-16} 
$Diagonal E2 matrix element=-0.09 {I+12-11} (2023Il02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$E2 matrix element (1419, 4+ to 606, 2+)=+0.52 eb {I4} (2023Il02) 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)=0.0300 {I+48-44} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 598.706 {I14} from {+76}Cu |b{+-} decay, 598.56 {I5} from {+77}Cu |b{+-}n decay, 593 {I10} from ({+76}Zn,P'), and 602 {I9} from (HI,{+76}Zn|g) 
M$Coulomb excitation from 0+ g.s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 697.815 {I14} from {+76}Cu |b{+-} decay, 697.72 {I8} from {+77}Cu |b{+-}n decay, 708 {I16} from ({+76}Zn,P'), and 703 {I11} from (HI,{+76}Zn|g) 
M$expected from Coulomb excitation in a two-step process 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$possible E1 (2021Ch56) from analysis of expected transition probabilities for E1, M1, E2 and M2 transitions. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=6.2|*10{+-9}, if 1337|g is the only transition from the 2633 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 598.70 {I6} (2005Va19), 598.68 {I5} (1990Wi12), 599 (2021Ch56). 
RI$others: 100 {I5} (2005Va19), 100 {I3} (1990Wi12), 103 {I6} (2021Ch56). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 697.69 {I7} (2005Va19), 697.78 {I5} (1990Wi12), 698 (2021Ch56). 
RI$others: 59 {I3} (2005Va19), 52.9 {I20} (1990Wi12), 99 {I6} (2021Ch56). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1053 {I1} (2005Va19), 1053.4 {I5} (1990Wi12). 
RI$others: 3.1 {I9} (2005Va19), 2.4 {I10} (1990Wi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$others 1337 {I1} (2005Va19), 1337.08 {I8} (1990Wi12), 1337 (2021Ch56). 
RI$others: 30 {I2} (2005Va19), 30.2 {I20} (1990Wi12), 100 {I7} (2021Ch56). 
M$possible E1 (2021Ch56) from analysis of expected transition probabilities for E1, M1, E2 and M2 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 179.6 {I3} (2005Va19, 179.8 in Fig. 5 of 2005Va19), 180 (2021Ch56), 180.2 {I3} (1990Wi12). 
RI$others: 3.8 {I4} (2005Va19), 3.2 {I11} (1990Wi12), 12 {I2} (2021Ch56). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 464.3 {I3} (2005Va19), 464.42 {I21} (1990Wi12). 
RI$others: 3.0 {I4} (2005Va19), 2.9 {I7} (1990Wi12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 340.87 {I9} (2005Va19), 340.89 {I7} (1990Wi12), 341 (2021Ch56). 
RI$others: 16 {I1} (2005Va19), 16.4 {I12} (1990Wi12); 68 {I5} (2021Ch56) is largely discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 258.5 {I1} (2005Va19), 258 (2021Ch56). 
RI$others: 2.0 {I4} (2005Va19); 10 {I3} (2021Ch56) is largely discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 419.3 {I4} (2005Va19), 419.50 {I7} (1990Wi12), 419 (2021Ch56); |g placed from a 1715 level in 1990Wi12. 
RI$others: 3.4 {I4} (2005Va19), 9.7 {I7} (1990Wi12), 8.8 {I19} (2021Ch56); note a large difference between value from 2005Va19 and others. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement of this |g ray here is based on previously proposed (2005Va19 and 1990Wi12) |g cascade 1053|g-464|g feeding the 1305, (4+) level, although, with an ambiguous ordering. Since no 464|g is reported by 2016Sh07, the 1053|g likely feeds the 1305 level, however, it should be noted that the 1053|g is reported by 2016Sh07 to be in coincidence with only the 602|g, whereas, with its placement here, it is expected to be in coincidence with the 703|g also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)|_=0.0290 {I36} (2009Va01), 0.0286 {I+58-51} (2023Il02). 
$E2 matrix element (599, 2+ to g.s., 0+)=+0.378 eb {I36} (2023Il02) 
$B(E2)|_=0.0285 {I56} listed in 2023Il02; but the evaluators obtain B(E2)|_=0.0286 {I+58-51} from the matrix element 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)|_=0.033 {I+8-6}, weighted average of 0.032 {I9}(2009Va01) and 0.0336 {I+77-63} (2023Il02). 
$E2 matrix element (1297, 4+ to 599, 2+)=+0.55 eb {I6} (2023Il02) 
$B(E2)|_=0.0330 {I70} listed in 2023Il02, but the evaluators obtain B(E2)|_=0.0336 {I+77-63} from the matrix element 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
MR$assumed in 2009Il01 with an uncertainty of 0.03, from similar 9/2+ to 7/2+ transitions amongst low-lying levels in {+73}Ge and {+75}Ge. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$the multipolarity may be E3, as suggested by the assigned J|p values. Deduced B(E3)(W.u.) is smaller than any other value for A<90 (1979En04). In the A=80 region, B(E3)(W.u.) for 7/2+ to 1/2- range from 0.0362 {I6} for {+77}Se to 0.00071 {I4} for {+81}Se 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$it is assumed that 685.5|g in 2009Pa35 is the same as 688.7|g in {+78}Cu |b{+-}n decay data of 2005Va19 and 687.17 in {+77}Cu |b{+-} of 2009Il01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2463.6 {I10}, I|g=6 {I2} (2009Pa35), placed from 3826 level in 2009Pa35 on the basis of coin with 591|g. The evaluators assume that same |g is seen in both 2009Il01 and 2009Pa35. 2463.6-591.1 |g|g coin result of 2009Pa35 seems in disagreement with that from 2009Il01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=114.7 {I3}, I|g=33 {I4} (2009Pa35). Absolute I|g=6.0 (2009Wi03) in agreement with 7.7 from 2009Il01 
TI$ from 2009Il01 
RI$deduced (by evaluators) from listed I(|g+ce) and |a 
MR$ assumed in 2009Il01 with an uncertainty of 0.03, from similar 9/2+ to 7/2+ transitions amongst low-lying levels in {+73}Ge and {+75}Ge. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
$Measured I|g=56.7 {I11} (2009Il01), 64 {I9} (2009Pa35). Absolute I|g=10.8 (2009Il01), 11.1 (2009Wi03). No intensity is given in the data field for I|g as it varies with time due to the long half-life of 1.05 s for the isomer as compared to the half-life 469.8 ms for the parent activity of {+77}Cu 
$E|g=772.0 {I2} (2009Pa35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=505.7 {I9}, I|g=100 {I5} (2009Pa35). Absolute I|g=19.8 (2009Wi03) in agreement with 19.1 from 2009Il01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1277.7 {I2}, I|g=46 {I4} (2009Pa35). Absolute I|g=7.2 (2009Wi03) in agreement with 7.1 from 2009Il01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance at 2528 level mult=E2 or M2, but E2 is more likely from systematics of N=48 isotones. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$ 2005Va19 did not observe this |g ray in the decay of {+78}Cu, only an upper limit of 20 {I7} is given for 908.3|g known from IT decay (2000Da07). However, 2008Wi01 and 2009Gr06 seem to observe a 910-keV |g ray as implied in their level scheme figures 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(|_)=0.0154 {I38} (2009Va01). This value is about the same as corresponding B(E2)(|^) listed in 2007Va20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this |g may also contain a component from 908.3-keV |g ray from 2529, (6+) to 1642, (4+). (Compiler's note) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(|_)=0.0144 {I29} (2009Va01). This value is about the same as corresponding B(E2)(|^) listed in 2007Va20. Other B(E2)(|_) values measured by 2009Va01: 0.0150 {I32}, 0.0151 {I37}, 0.0138 {I43}. 2009Va01 adopt the value with the lowest relative uncertainty. The evaluator obtains weighted averaged B(E2)(|_)=0.0146 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) in units of e{+2}b{+2}. Compiler obtains B(E2)=0.0160 {I+155-65} using upper and lower bounds of uncertainties given by 2016Sh07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$R(90|'/[37|'+143|'])=0.80 {i13} (2022Mi15) 
M$from angular anisotropy ratio. 2022Mi15 determine R for a number of transitions in contaminant channels and establish reference values of R=0.84 {I3} and R=1.26 {I4} for pure quadrupole and dipole transitions, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 75.0 {I1} from {+63}Ge |e decay, 75.4 {I3} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 75.4 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 75.2 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 74.6 {I1} from {+64}As |ep decay is discrepant 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) and |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+29}Si,|apn|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 442.8 {I1} from {+63}Ge |e decay, 443.3 {I2} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), and 443.1 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
M$|DJ=(0) from |g|g(DCO) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+63}Ge |e decay. Others: 722.2 {I2} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 722.2 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Others: 1077.2 {I5} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1077.2 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 699.3 {I3} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 29.8 {I21} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 19.5 {I8} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 978.6 {I4} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 27.0 {I14} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 17.9 {I8} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1421.6 {I6} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1422.0 {I5} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 1422.6 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+28}Si,|ap|g). Other: 100 {I6} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Others: 624.7 {I3} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 624.6 {I5} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 25.1 {I10} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 28.0 {I9} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(DO) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and ({+32}S,2|ap|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 893.9 {I5} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 894.1 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 893.7 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 
M$either Q with |DJ=2 or D with |DJ=0 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) ({+29}Si,|apn|g); |DJ=(0) and |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 894.3 {I4} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 894.1 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 894.0 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1139.8 {I4} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1139.4 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 1139.9 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 608.6 {I6} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 609.6 {I3} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.04 {I26} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1.25 {I14} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1772.2 {I7} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 1772.8 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 1772.3 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 100 {I4} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 
M$D from |g|g(DCO) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g); 2001We11 in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) show that their measured |g|g(|q)(DCO) is best fitted with a calculation with |d=-0.3 {I2} which is compatible with E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 648.6 {I6} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g), 649.1 {I3} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g), and 648.7 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 100.0 {I34} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 785.8 {I3} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.8 {I7} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 8.00 {I25} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Others: 1209.1 {I4} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1208.8 {I5} from ({+29}Si,|apn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 878.9 {I6} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 878.4 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: I|g(878.5|g)/I|g(2497.5|g)=100 {I6}/27 {I9} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1344.0 {I8} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1341.9 {I5} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 42 {I4} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 34.5 {I35} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+D
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1545.6 {I7} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1544.7 {I3} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 100 {I6} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 1304.2 {I10} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 
$Ordering of the 1812-1305 |g cascade from 11974 level could be reversed (2021Ru07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1424.9 {I7} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1426.6 {I2} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 63 {I5} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 48 {I5} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: E|g=1867.3 {I9}, I|g=100 {I5} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 
M$|DJ=1 transition from |g|g(DCO) in ({+28}Si,|ap|g); |a asymmetry from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) is also consistent with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1726.3 {I9} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1725.4 {I4} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 68 {I5} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 50 {I5} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+D
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1941.2 {I9} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and 1939.5 {I3} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g). Other: 100 {I7} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 1763.5 {I3} from ({+32}S,2|ap|g) is discrepant 
RI$I|g(1763.5|g)/I|g(1864.0|g)=100 {I5}/93 {I5} is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$correspond to the 1921.9|g+1924.3|g doublet for a peak structure at around 1922 reported by 2001We11 in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). No doublet around this energy is reported by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). See more detailed comments regarding this |g doublet as well as a level doublet of 12831+12832 reported by 2001We11 from placements of the doublet transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E,M$2001We11 in ({+32}S,2|ap|g) report a E|g=1963.6 {I2} with Mult=Q based on |g asymmetry, which may correspond to the doublet of the 1963.4|g from 12833 level and the stronger 1962.7|g with Mult=(Q) from 19538 level reported by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 1963.4|g here has |DJ=(1) from level scheme, which is inconsistent with Mult=Q assigned for 1963.6|g in ({+32}S,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+32}S,2|ap|g), placed by 2001We11 as the only transition from a 13039 level which is not confirmed by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). Other: 2214.2 {I20} from ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$This transition is much stronger than 2214.2|g as reported in 2021Ru07, but is not seen in 2001We11, probably due to detector threshold, since no transitions above 2497 keV are reported in 2001We11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from the decay scheme in Figure 6 of 2019Ru07. But 74.8 {I1} read off from the |g spectrum of {+64}As decay in Figure 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M$assigned by the evaluator based on |DJ=1 transition from DCO; not assigned by 2021Ru07 
$DCO for 1962.7+1963.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in 1991Ba20; E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. Nearly isotropic |g(|q) is consistent with a predominantly a dipole transition (1991Ba20) 
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I10} 
$DCO=0.6 {I2} gate on 75.4|g with |DJ=1, consistent with |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1991Ba20 place a 1422.0|g-624.6|g cascade from the 2047 level to g.s., making a tentative level at E=625 and state that the order of the two transitions are uncertain. The 625 level is not seen in other studies. The order of the two transitions is reversed in 2001We11, thus making a level at E=1422 instead, which is confirmed in a more detailed |g|g-coin measurement by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$See comment for 1422.6|g from 1422 level about the placement of 624.6|g-1422.6|g cascade. 
$A{-2}=+0.18 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I7} 
$DCO=0.6 {I2} gate on 75.4|g (|DJ=1), consistent with |DJ=2; this is likely for 894.1|g from 2941 level 
$DCO=1.0 {I1} gate on 1077.2|g (|DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.6 {I2} gate on 75.4|g (|DJ=1), consistent with |DJ=2 
$DCO=1.0 {I1} gate on 1077.2|g (|DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I14} 
$DCO=1.3 {I3} gate on 1077.2|g (|DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=2 
$DCO=1.0 {I1} gate on 894.1|g (doublet of |DJ=0 and |DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$1991Ba20 place a 1772.9|g-649.1|g cascade from 6502 level to feed the 4081 level, making a tentative intermediate level at 4729. The authors state that the proposed order of the two transitions are tentative. The order of two transitions is reversed in 2001We11 and 2021Ru07 with the intermediate level at 5853, which is adopted by the evaluator. 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I13} 
$DCO=2.3 {I3} gate on 1139.4|g (|DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=1 
$DCO=1.9 {I3} gate on 894.1|g (doublet of |DJ=0 and |DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=1 
$DCO=3.3 {I3} gate on 649.1|g (|DJ=2 or 0), consistent with |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placed from a level at a 4729 level in 1991Ba20, but not confirmed in other studies. See comment for 1772.8|g from 5853 level about the placement of 649.1|g-1772.8|g cascade. 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I15} 
$DCO=0.9 {I3} gate on 1139.4|g (|DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 
$DCO=0.9 {I1} gate on 894.1|g (doublet of |DJ=0 and |DJ=2), consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} 
$DCO=1.8 {I4} gate on 649.1|g and 1.6 {I4} gate on 1139.4|g, but it is stated in 1991Ba20 that statistics is insufficient for a firm conclusion about multipolarity, but possibly suggests a dipole character. |g(|q) above is consistent with |DJ=2 or 0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1421.68 
$R=0.95 {I5}. 
$1996MiZU place a 1421|g-626|g cascade from the 2046 level to g.s., making a level at E=626 with J|p=(5/2-), as in 1991Ba20 who state the order of the two transitions are uncertain. The 626 level is not seen in other studies. The order of the two transitions is reversed in 2001We11, thus making a level at E=1422 instead, which is confirmed in a more detailed |g|g-coin measurement by 2021Ru07 in ({+28}Si,|ap|g) and adopted by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$See comment for 1422.6|g from 1422 level about the placement of 624.6|g-1422.6|g cascade. 
$DCO=0.63 {I9}. 
$R=0.77 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$Placed from 6501 level in 1996MiZU. See comment for 648.7|g from 6501 level 
$DCO=0.55 {I4}. 
$R=0.60 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$1996MiZU place 1772|g-649|g cascade from 6502 level to feed the 4081 level, making an intermediate level at 4730, as also proposed in 1991Ba20 who state the proposed order of the two transitions are tentative. The order of two transitions is reversed in 2001We11 and 2021Ru07 with the intermediate level at 5853 which is adopted by the evaluator. 
$DCO=1.09 {I5}. 
$R=1.13 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$R=0.94 {I3}. 
$placed from 9483 level by 2021Ru07 in {+40}Ca({+28}Si,|ap|g), which is adopted in Adopted Levels, Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$R=1.05 {I9}. 
$The doublet of 1921.9|g from 10333 level and 1924.3|g from 10964 level proposed in 2001We11 in this dataset is considered as a single transition of 1924.8|g from 12833 level in 2021Ru07 as adopted in Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$R=1.02 {I6}. 
$Placed from 12833 level in Adopted Levels, Gammas. See also comments for 1921.9|g from 10333 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy difference=1874.6, which may imply 1864.0 is a misprint 
$R=0.40 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The order of 1868|g-1924|g from 12832 level is reversed in Adopted Levels, Gammas 
$R=0.40 {I2} is inconsistent with |DJ=2 from level scheme, but consistent with |DJ=1 in Adopted Level, Gammas with the reversed order of the |g cascade mentioned above. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$128|g is a close doublet (<1 keV apart) in (p,n|g) deexciting 128 and 171 levels. It is most likely a single line in {+64}Ge |e decay (deexciting only the 128 level) and in {+54}Fe({+12}C,pn|g) (deexciting only the 171 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g), where it is a doublet, the other placement from 128 level. Other: 128.1 in ({+12}C,pn|g) 
$If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)|?280. If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)|?0.0034 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g not reported in {+64}Ge |e decay, taken from the Adopted Gammas 
TI$from intensity balance 
M$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g not resolved from Pb K| x ray in {+64}Ge |e decay. Energy and intensity (based on branching ratio) from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g mainly associated with 128.2 level; only a small fraction may belong with the decay of 171 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a|>12.5 (1974Ha42) (from observed and inferred yield of 42.9 level) suggests 43|g not dipole. The detection of 43|g as photons suggests that multipolarity is not higher than E2 or M2. For mult=M2, the half-life should be higher than 21.9 |ms 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(doublet)=242, equally divided amongst two components, on the basis of excitation functions by 1974Ha42 
$Strong conversion line reported (1973WyZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 1975We24, in (p,|g), suggest that the g.s. transition accounts for only 60% {I10} of the decay of the 2704 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
This |g has been assigned to the decays of 1299 and 1880 levels in the {+64}Zn(p,|g) data of 1987Vi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI 28 {I3} (1971Ne06) 
M from triple |g|g(|q) (1973Ne07) and |DJ|p 
MR -0.04 {I2} or +3.6 {I4} (phase convention undefined), from triple |g|g(|q) (1973Ne07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Branching: uncertainty given as 5 in 1975We24. 
RI 16.0 {I15}, for E|g=820 {I3} (1971Ne06). 
M from triple |g|g(|q) (1973Ne07) and |DJ|p 
MR +0.12 {I6} or -12 {I+3-5} (phase convention undefined), for a level at 821 with J|p=3/2-, from triple |g|g(|q) (1973Ne07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M3)
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference. 
M from |g|g(|q) (1979Ra12) and |DJ|p 
MR from |g|g(|q) of 9/2(4786|g)9/2+(751|g)9/2(1095|g)5/2- cascade in 1979Ra12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q) (1982Ra11) and |DJ|p 
MR |d (E2/M1)|?+0.3 for J(2207)=5/2 and |d(E2+M3)>-3 for J(2207)=7/2, from |g|g(|q) of 5/2(4934|g)J(2207|g)3/2- cascade in 1982Ra11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
%branching=60 {I10}. It is estimated that 40% {I10} of the decay of the 2704 level is not observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q) (1982Ra11). 
MR |?-1 for J(2811)=3/2 and <+2 for J(2811)=5/2, from |g|g(|q) of 5/2(4330|g)J(2620|g)5/2- cascade in 1982Ra11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|a(L)exp=0.77 {I13} 
ELC From |e decay 
MR 0.079 {I17} from |a(L)exp implies a large but acceptable E2 transition strength of 240 W.u. 120. |d(E1+M2)=0.08 from |a(L)exp would imply an M2 transition strength of 1.3|*10{+4} W.u. +6-4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |a(K)exp=0.208 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.021 {I4} measured in {+66}Ge |e decay, M1+E2 from J|p of the initial and final levels. 
MR from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.050 {I4} |a(L)exp=0.006 {I3} 
EKC,ELC From |e decay; other: |a(K)exp=0.047 {I9} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI there is serious disagreement over the relative branching of the 53|g. According to {+66}Ge |e decay data the 53|g is the major branch while I|g(53)/I|g(96)=0.03 from |g|g(|q) in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.059 {I17} 
M from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), (|a,np|g) and |DJ|p 
MR -0.2 {I+2-1} if J|p(162)=3+ from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g); -0.5|<|d(D+Q)|<0.0 if J|p(162)=2 from |g(|q) of the 96|g doublet in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E reported in (|a,n|g), (|a,np|g); weak in (p,n|g) 
Q+O from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); E2+M3 from RUL. |d(E2+M3)=-0.2 {I2} if J|p(162)=3+, |d(D+Q)=+0.9 {I2} if J(162)=2; from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.040 {I7} 
MR -4.0 {I5} for J|p(234)=2+,-0.34 {I10} for J|p(234)=1+ from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g). <0.24 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0144 {I19} 
EKC From |e decay; other: 0.0118 {I21} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0144 {I19} in {+66}Ge |e decay. |d=+0.11 {I3} if J(234 level)=2, |d=-1.2 {I7} if J(234)=1 from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(p,n|g). |d=+0.05 if J(234 level)=2, |d=+1.6 {I10} if J(234 level)=1 from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g). |d <0.24 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0131 {I24} 
RI from |e decay larger by a factor of 2.5 compared to that from (p,n|g) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0115 {I15} in {+66}Ge |e decay. 
MR from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(p,n|g). |d=+0.20 {I4} for J(291 level)=2 is incompatible with |d<0.06 from |a(K)exp in {+66}Ge |e decay. |d <0.23 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0076 {I14} 
M from |g(|q) and |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 
MR from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); <0.28 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0047 {I9} 
MR +0.18 {I6} or +1.40 {I15} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(p,n|g); <0.28 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0039 {I7} 
MR from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); <0.30 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 
E E|g=291.23 {I16} observed in {+66}Ge |e decay is shown deexciting the 291-keV level. The adopted gammas placement follows from the coincidence data of 1994Ti02 in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0060 {I11} 
|d(Q/D)=+0.03 {I10} from (|a,n|g); +0.17 {I10} from |g(|q) in (|a,np|g); <0.35 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E E|g=225.93 {I24} observed in {+66}Ge |e decay is shown deexciting the 291-keV level where it gave a poor fit to the level energy difference. The adopted gammas placement follows from the coincidence data of 1994Ti02 in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I5} 
MR from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g), {+64}Zn(|a,np|g); <0.41 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I7} 
MR +0.0 {I1} for J=3 to J=2 transition, from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), (|a,np|g), and (p,n|g); <0.32 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M Q+O from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g); E2 from RUL 
|d(M3/E2)=-0.09 {I10} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g) {+64}Zn(|a,np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q) {+63}Cu(|a,n|g); M1+E2 from RUL. 
|d(Q/D)=-0.02 {I10} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g), {+64}Zn(|a,np|g) 
MR from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g), {+64}Zn(|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 1.1 {I4} from 1970De39. In serious disagreement with the very weak 53|g branch observed in {+66}Zn(p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR -4.0 {I5} for J|p(234)=2+, -0.34 {I10} for J|p(234)=1+ from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); <0.24 from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E doublet proposed in 1969Sa08 with one |g placed from the 537 level and the additional one placed from the 291 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR -0.2 {I+2-1} if J|p(162)=3+ from |g(|q); -0.5|<|d(D+Q)|< 0.0 if J|p(162)=2 from |g(|q) of the 96|g doublet in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
M Q+O from |g(|q); E2 from RUL 
MR -0.2 {I2} if J|p(162)=3+; |d(D+Q)=+0.9 {I2} if J(162)=2 from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
MR -0.1 {i1} assuming J=9 for the 3043-keV level; +0.9 {i1} assuming J|p=9+ for the 3043-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M from 947|g(|q), calculated from |g(|q) of the 944|g+947|g doublet in {+64}Zn(|a,np|g) and |g(|q) of 944|g in {+63}Cu(|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E intensity ratios of 96|g with other gammas in coincidence spectra by 1994Ti02 do not support the doublet nature of this |g noted by 1971Na15. 
M (D+Q) for the 96|g with -0.5<|d<0 for a 2+ to 1+ transition (1971Na15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2 + M3
decay_comment:
$R(DCO)=1.09 {I3}, R(ADO)=1.34 {I2}, POL=0.33 {I11} 
M$In addition to the R(DCO) and R(ADO) arguments, level lifetime (|?ns) from Weisskopf estimate, theoretical linear polarization value (+0.43 {I3}) and the fitted angular distribution coefficients (A{-2}= +0.51 {I4} and A{-4}= -0.16 {I6}) establishes a E2+M3 multipolarity assignment 
MR$Extracted from the |h{+2} minimization of the experimental angular distribution coefficients A{-2} and A{-4} with the theoretically calculated values. Other: +0.10 {I3} from comparison to theoretical polarization values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$compiler's note: DCO, with large uncertainty, does not give definite stretched quadrupole 
$This |g placed from a 10569, 21(+) level in 2017Bh05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR +0.53 {I12} or +2.2 {I+13-7} for a 5/2- to 7/2- transition; -0.12 {I5} for a 9/2- to 7/2- transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M E2 if it is a 9/2+ to 13/2+ transition or M1+E2 if it is a 13/2+ to 13/2+ transition, from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g), {+53}Cr({+16}O,pn|g) 
|d(M3/E2)=-0.00 {I1}; |d(E2/M1)=-0.33 {I2} from {+64}Zn(|a,p|g), {+53}Cr({+16}O,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M M1+E2 for a 13/2+ to 13/2+ transition; E2+M3 for a 17/2+ to 13/2+ transition from |g(|q) and polarization data in {+64}Zn(|a,p|g), {+53}Cr({+16}O,pn|g) 
|d(E2/M1)=+0.39 {I9}; |d(M3/E2)=+0.09 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M (M1+E2) (1978Al32) 
MR +0.53 {I12} or +2.2 {I+13-7} for a 5/2- to 7/2- transition; -0.12 {I5} for a 9/2- to 7/2- transition (1978Al32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M E2 for a 9/2+ to 13/2+ transition; M1+E2 for a 13/2+ to 13/2+ transition (1978Al32) 
MR -0.00 {I1} for a 9/2+ to 13/2+ transition; -0.33 {I2} for a 13/2+ to 13/2+ transition (1978Al32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M M1+E2 if J|p(3629)=13/2+; E2(+M3) if J|p(3629)=17/2+ (1978Al32) 
MR +0.39 {I9} for a 13/2+ to 13/2+ transition; +0.09 {I6} for a 17/2+ to 13/2+ transition (1978Al32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
MR$|d(E2/M1)=+0.0 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) and +0.01 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,n|g) 
M$from |a(K)(exp)=0.0148 {I13} from 1967Me18 and |d=+0.01 {I2} from |g(|q) (1967Me18), mult is assigned M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,n|g); M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp in {+68}Zn(p,n|g) 
MR$Other: <0.31 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in {+68}Zn(p,n|g); M1+E2 from |a(K)exp in {+68}Zn(p,n|g) 
MR$Other: <0.66 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$Others: 0.54 {I12} from |a(K)exp, -0.3 {I2} (1976Mo22) and +1.0 {I1} (1973HaWI) from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) (1973HaWi) 
MR$Others: <0.22 from |a(K)exp, 0.0 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) (1976Mo22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+68}Zn(p,n|g). Other: |<16 from {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) 
M$|DJ=2, |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$Others: <0.22 from |a(K)exp and -0.07 {I4} from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+68}Zn(|a,pn|g) (1973HaWI). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$Others: <1.5 from |a(K)exp and +0.9 {I3} from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+68}Zn(|a,pn|g) (1973HaWI). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Doublet transition in (|a,n|g); feeds both the 376 and 1247 levels. 
RI$from {+68}Zn(p,n|g). Other: |<32 in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$0.0 {I2} for J(2103)=8 or +0.4 {I2} for J(2103)=7 from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$slightly contaminated by the 1054|g from {+67}Ga. 
MR$+0.12 {I2} for J=7 or +1.4 {I2} for J=8 from |g(|q) in {+65}Cu(|a,n|g),{+66}Zn(|a,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$data normalized to |a(K)(exp)=0.0142, assuming pure M1 for 175|g. 
MR$+0.0 {I2} from |g(|q) (1976Mo22) and -0.10 {I4} from |g(|q) (1973HaWi). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.54 {I12} from |a(K)exp, sign from |g(|q) in 1976Mo22. Others:-0.3 {I2} from |g(|q) (1976Mo22) and +1.0 {I1} from |g(|q) (1973HaWI). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Observed by 1993Ti04 however authors give no specific placements for |g's originating from states above 2 MeV; the evaluator has followed the placement of 1976Mo22 and 1973HaWI who assigned a 780|g to this level. 
MR$0.0 {I2} for J=8 or +0.4 {I2} for J=7 from |g(|q) (1976Mo22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$slightly contaminated by the 1054|g from {+67}Ga 
MR$+0.12 {I20} for J=7 or +1.4 {I2} for J=8 from |g(|q) (1976Mo22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)=0.0142 for mult=M1 is used by the evaluator as the normalization value. |d=+0.01 {I2} from |g(|q) (1967Me18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q with |d=-0.07 {I4} from weighted average of -0.10 {I5} and -0.03 {I5} from |g(|q) (1968Bi03); M1+E2 from |a(K)exp 
MR$Other: <0.66 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$Other: 0.0095 {I8} (1967Me18) 
M$D+Q with |d=+0.25 {I5} from |g(|q) (1968Bi03); M1+E2 from |a(K)exp 
MR$Other: 0.54 {I12} from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}; 0.53 {I10} from |a(exp) in {+69}Ge |e decay 
B(E2)(W.u.)=8.1 {I5} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$0.030 {I9} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}. 
B(E2)(W.u.)=0.29 {I5} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$0.13 {I4} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}. 
B(E2)(W.u.)=4.1 {I10} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,p'|g) and RUL 
MR$0.79 from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}. 
B(E2)(W.u.)=3.4 {I10} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$0.40 {I5} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation and T{-1/2}. 
B(E2)(W.u.)=12.3 {I12} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$preferred value by authors in (p,|g); -0.22 {I4} also possible. Others: -2.0 +{I3}-{I6} or -0.68 +{I9}-{I10} in |e decay; -1.5 {I5} or -0.42 +{I16}-{I40} in ({+7}Li,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M Q from |g(|q) in {+64}Ni({+7}Li,2n|g); from RUL 
B(E2)(W.u.)=9.8 {I15} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$This transition is not included in the least-squares fit for the excitation energies since the energy fit is poor. The least-squares fit gives E|g=616.01 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$preferred value by authors in (p,|g); +1.1 {I1} also possible. Others: -1.0 +{I1}-{I2} or -0.025 {I75} in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$preferred value by authors in (p,|g); -0.15 {I5} also possible. Others: -6.5 +{I14}-{I21} or -0.30 {I75} in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$This transition is not included in the least-squares fit for the excitation energies since the energy fit is poor. The least-squares fit gives E|g=1151.71 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$This transition is not included in the least-squares fit for the excitation energies since the energy fit is poor. It cannot be placed from a level within +-10 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) of 7306|g in {+69}Ga(|g,|g') and its linear polarization measurement assumed to be dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1976Ho09 with uncertainty assigned by the evaluator. Shown in authors spectrum and decay scheme but not in their Table. 
RI$From 1967Zo01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M from adopted gammas 
MR >-0.45 and <-0.10 for J|p(1106)=-3/2, phase convention not defined (1968La05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E assigned to the 1972.62 level by the authors; {+68}Zn(p,|g) data indicate this deexcites the 1973.24 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Q+O with |d=+0.13 {I14} if it is a 11/2 to 7/2 transition; D+Q with |d=+0.62 {I12} if it is a 9/2 to 7/2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M Q+O with |d=-0.03 {I6} if it is a 11/2 to 7/2 transition; D+Q with |d=+0.43 {I8} if it is a 9/2 to 7/2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit 
MR$0.00 {I4} for a 11/2 to 13/2 transition; -1.0 {I2} for a 13/2 to 13/2 transition. For the second case, |d rules out E1 +M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M (Q(+O)) with |d=-0.04 {I8} if it is a 19/2 to 15/2 transition; D+Q with |d=+0.37 {I8} if it is a 17/2 to 15/2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) and (|a,pn|g); M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 
MR$0.00 {I+(-14} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=3.8|*10{+-3} {I10} (1984Fe03) 
M$M1 or E1+M2 from |a(K) exp in (p,n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.4|*10{+-2} {I5} (1984Fe03) 
M$D from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g), |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$0.00 {I1} from |g(|q) in (|a,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement by evaluators. 1970Li04 tentatively place this |g as depopulating a tentative 188-keV level. 
E$other: 188 {I2} (1970Li04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement by evaluators. 1970Li04 place this |g as depopulating 508-keV level. 
E$other: 319 {I2} (1970Li04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Polarization function R=-0.04 {I6} for the unresolved 6514|g and the 6521|g from neutron capture in {+71}Ga (1972St06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=109 {I7} 
M$A{-2}=-0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1973Na17). 
MR$0.00 {I+10-7} from |g(|q) in 1973Na17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g'=37 {I3} 
M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1973Na17). 
MR$-0.09 {6} or +2.6 {I+6-2} if 651-keV level has J=2, from |g(|q) in 1973Na17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=100 {I10} 
M$A{-2}=-0.31 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I8} (1973Na17), A{-2}=-0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 (1975Hu06) 
MR$-0.07 {I+10-12} from |g(|q) in 1973Na17, 0.00 {I6} or 2.7 {I5} (1975Hu06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g'=30 {I5} 
$|a(K) exp normalized to Hager Seltzer value for pure E2, |a(K)=0.0586 (1984Fe03). 
M$A{-2}=+0.17 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I9} (1973Na17). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=0.00 {I+9-14} from |g(|q) in 1973Na17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=1.1 {I1} 
M$A{-2}=-0.27 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I9} (1973Na17). 
MR$+0.1 {I2} from |g(|q) in 1973Na17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g'=4.4 {I7} 
M$A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I3} (1973Na17). 
MR$0.34 {I9} or 1.2 {I2} from |g(|q) in 1973Na17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=19.8 {ILT} 
M$A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1973Na17). 
M$M1 or E1+M2 from |a(K)exp (1984Fe03). Decay scheme requires E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g'=1.4 {I3} 
E$no placement given in Table 1 of 1973Na17, however, |g ray is placed in Figure 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g'=1.1 {I4} 
E$no placement given in Table 1 of 1973Na17, however, |g ray is placed in Figure 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=6.8 {I10} 
M$A{-2}=+0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1973Na17). 
MR$=0.12 {I6} or +2.93 {I3} from |g(|q) in 1973Na17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) and B(M1)(W.u.) are from measured B(E2)|^ and B(M1)|^ in (e,e'), respectively. 
$Other B(M1)(W.u.)=0.93 {I+40-35}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.20 {I+43-17} from level T{-1/2} and |d(E2/M1) 
E$others: 390.0 {I3} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 389.92 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 390.2 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g(ADO) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g); quadrupole component observed in (e,e'); M1+E2 from level scheme 
MR$deduced by the evaluators from B(E2)|^=0.00017 {I14} (1994Ri07) and B(M1)|^=0.83 {I34} (1991Ri08) in (e,e'). It should be mentioned that deduction of B(M1) value in (e,e') data may be model dependent. It is also of some concern that B(M1) values were not reported in authors' later work in 1994Ri07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 487.3 {I1} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 487.41 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 487.5 {I2} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); D, |DJ=1 from |g(ADO) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
MR$other: 0.03 {I4} from |g(|q) (n,n'|g) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<0.12 from B(E2)|^<0.00034 in Coulomb excitation (1972An17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 121.52 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 121.591 {I10} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 121.54 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 121.1 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.3 {I9} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 8.19 {I16} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 9 {I5} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), 8.0 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 12.6 {I16} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
MR$-0.01 {I15} or -1.7 {I6} from |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); lower value is preferred from RUL for B(E2)(W.u.) and intensity balance in {+71}Zn decay 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<3367 upper limit exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 511.6 {I1} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 511.60 {I9} from (n,n'|g), and 511.3 {I2} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I15} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g), and 100 {I16} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
MR$other: 0.09 {I3} deduced from measured B(E2)=0.0080 {I13} in Coulomb excitation, adopted T{-1/2}=1.5 ps {I7} and adopted branching 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.6 {I7} from B(E2)|^=0.0080 {I13} (1972An17) and 5 {I2} (2010Di14) in Coulomb excitation are in a good agreement but they are in disagreement with B(E2)(W.u.)=70 {I40} deduced from adopted T{-1/2}=1.5 ps {I7}, branching and |d=-0.37 {I6}. Either level T{-1/2} or |d(E2/M1) may be in error if B(E2) values from Coulomb excitation are considered correct. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.055 {I+47-21} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=5.1|*10{+2} {I+43-19} if E2, exceeds RUL=300 
E$weighted average of 398.6 {I2} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 398.69 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), and 398.58 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 7.8 {I8} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 11.2 {I7} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), and 4.8 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0028 {I+23-10} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=23 {I+19-8} if E2 
E,RI$from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0032 {I+26-11} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=17 {I+14-6} if E2 
E,RI$from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min); uncertain |g in {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) with I|g<3.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.14 {I17} from B(E2)|^=0.0020 {I3} in Coulomb excitation (1972An17), 0.32 {I20} from B(E2)|^=0.00056 {I33} in (e,e') (1994Ri07) 
E$weighted average of 910.3 {I1} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 910.181 {I21} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 910 {I1} from (|g,|g'), and 910.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I8} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 
M$quadrupole component observed in Coulomb excitation; M1+E2 from level scheme 
MR$from adopted B(E2)|^=0.0013 {I7}, branching=91.4% {I18} and T{-1/2}=0.46 ps {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.037 {I+8-5} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=2.6|*10{+2} {I+5-4} if E2, B(E2)(W.u.) upper bound exceeds RUL=300. 
E$others: 453.1 {I2} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 453.12 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 452.5 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 22.9 {I25} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 26.47 {I20} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), and 25 {I11} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g). Others: 33.2 {I8} from (n,n'|g) and 100 {I9} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) are discrepant 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(ADO) in ({+}Li,|a2n|g) inconsistent with level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 575.1 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min); 574.17 {I15} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 
RI$from |b{+-} decay (4.140 h). Others: 3.8 {I4} (|b{+-} decay (2.45 min)); 7.0 {I8} (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=12.2 {I19} from B(E2)|^=0.032 {I5} in Coulomb excitation (1972An17), 4.3 {I15} from B(E2)|^=0.0112 {I37} in (e,e') (1994Ri07); 9 {I5} from 2010Di14 in Coulomb excitation (2010Di14) 
E$others: 964.8 {I2} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 965 {I1} from (|g,|g'), 964.62 {I6} from (n,n'|g), and 963.8 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); M2 component ruled out by RUL. Other: |d=0.76 {I+35-23} from adopted T{-1/2}=1.3 ps {I2}, B(E2)|^=0.022 {I6} and branching=76.5% {I15} for 964.7|g; Mult=Q, |DJ=2 from |g(ADO) in ({+}Li,|a2n|g) inconsistent with level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Upper bound of B(E2)(W.u.) exceeds RUL=300 
E$others: 142.98 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 143.4 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 8.43 {I16} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 6 {I5} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), 10.0 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 7.5 {I7} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M$D(+Q) from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Upper bound of B(E2)(W.u.) exceeds RUL=300 
$Caution and note: through e-mail communications in September 2021, Prof. H.T. Fortune (University of Pennsylvania) pointed out that B(E2)(W.u.) value for the 595.9-keV transition was too large to be realistic in comparison to those for E2 transitions in neighboring nuclei. Evaluators have checked available spectroscopic data related to this transition as well as |g-branching ratios from the 1107.5 keV level, and cannot find any arithmetic mistake. This B(E2)(W.u.) value is entirely dependent on experimental determination of B(E2)|^ for the 1107-keV transition by 1972An17 in Coulomb excitation. No other experimental measurement exists at present for independently verification of results in 1972An17 
E$others: 595.9 {I2} from ({+76}Ge,X|g); 596.21 {I5} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 
RI$unweighted average of 51.3 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 50 {I10} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), 50 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 57.6 {I9} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); Q, |DJ=2 from |g(ADO) in ({+76}Ge,X|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 620.18 {I5} from (n,n'|g); 619.7 {I2} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) is discrepant 
RI$others: 100 {I13} from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), 100 {I7} from (n,n'|g), and 100.0 {I12} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$unweighted average of +0.72 {I+8-5} from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 1.2 {I2} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.83 {I14} from B(E2)|^=0.0029 {I5} in Coulomb excitation (1972An17) 
E$weighted average of 1107.334 {I10} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 1107.6 {I2} from (n,n'|g), and 1107.2 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
RI$others: 4.6 {I5} from ({+76}Ge,X|g); 3.6 from (n,n'|g) and Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=7.2 {I10} from B(E2)|^=0.0063 {I9} in Coulomb excitation (1972An17) 
E$from (n,n'|g). Others: 1109.3 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 1109 {I1} from (|g,|g') 
M$quadrupole component observed in Coulomb excitation; M1+E2 from level scheme 
MR$from T{-1/2}=95 fs {I12} and B(E2)|^=0.0063 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0259 {I+40-38} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=206 {I+32-30} if E2 
E$unweighted average of 430.52 {I7} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 430.10 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 31.0 {I35} from (n,n'|g) is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 883.80 {I7} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 883.69 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 10.8 {I11} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 12.1 {I17} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0164 {I+14-12} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=29.3 {I+25-22} if E2 
E$weighted average of 907.92 {I3} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 907.6 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 35 {I7} from (n,n'|g) (1984Ar09) in disagreement, although, 108 {I12} in another (n,n'|g) study (1977SmZI) is in agreement with |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.7 {I4} from B(E2)|^=0.0096 {I14} in Coulomb excitation (1972An17) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.018 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<82 if E2 
E$weighted average of 565.854 {I12} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 565.82 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 26.8 {I25} (n,n'|g) is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0088 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<14 if E2 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 27 {I27} in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=988.596 
E$weighted average of 988.640 {I10} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 988.57 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); M1+E2 from level scheme 
MR$weighted average of +0.20 {I3} from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 0.10 {I5} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0027 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<1.8 if E2 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<1.2 from B(E2)|^<0.0051 in Coulomb excitation (1972An17) 
E$weighted average of 1475.972 {I14} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 1475.90 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
M$quadruple component observed in Coulomb excitation; M1+E2 from level scheme 
RI$other: 76 {I7} (n,n'|g) is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 386.371 {I10} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 386.50 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 386.0 {I2} from ({+76}Ge,X|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); D, |DJ=1 from |g(ADO) in ({+76}Ge,X|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.12 {I+9-5} if M1. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.0|*10{+2} {I+29-17} exceeds RUL=300 
E$weighted average of 666.8 {I2} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 666.74 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 50 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.040 {I+29-20} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.1|*10{+2} {I+8-6} if E2. 
E$weighted average of 721.4 {I3} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 721.05 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 25.0 {I30} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 13.2 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.056 {I+38-24} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=65 {I+45-28} if E2 
E$unweighted average of 1120.0 {I1} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 1119.69 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 100 {I10} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0019 {I+14-9} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=2.2 {I+15-10} if E2 
E,RI$from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00061 {I+43-27} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=0.58 {I+41-25} if E2 
E,RI$1240.83 {I6} from (n,n'|g) not used in averaging since I|g=54 {I5} is too high by a factor of |?30 as compared to |b{+-} decay data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0033 {I+23-14} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.8 {I+13-8} if E2 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.69 {I23} from B(E2)|^=0.0012 {I4} in (e,e') (1994Ri07) 
E$weighted average of 1631.6 {I2} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 1631.42 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 17.7 {I15} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 23 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
M$quadrupole component observed in (e,e'); M1+E2 from level scheme 
MR$0.8 +|@-4 from T{-1/2}, B(E2)|^=0.0012 {I4} in (e,e'), and branching=9.6% {I+20-16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.032 {I+7-8} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=32 {I+7-8} if E2 
E$weighted average of 1208.005 {I22} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 1208.06 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 64 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.028 {I+6-7} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=28 {I+6-7} if E2 
E$weighted average of 1232.181 {I24} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and 1232.09 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1719.574 {I23} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (4.140 h), 1719 {I1} from (|g,|g'), and 1719.38 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); M2 component ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.041 {I+28-19} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.0|*10{+2} {I+7-5} if E2. 
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=787.62 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1905.36 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); M2 component ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.026 {I+22-9} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=16 {I+14-6} if E2 
E$weighted average of 1553.0 {I5} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min) and 1552.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from |b{+-} decay (2.45 min). Other: 20 in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.019 {I+16-7} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=7 {I+6-2} if E2 
E$weighted average of 2064.6 {I2} from {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay (2.45 min), 2064 {I1} from (|g,|g'), and 2063.9 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from |b{+-} decay (2.45 min). Other: 100 {I20} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$other: 753.72 {I5} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 
M$D+Q and |d from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h); M2 component ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0145 {I+45-32} exceeds RUL=0.01 
E,RI$other: 771.18 {I6} with I|g=45 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 1139.95 {I8} from (n,n'|g) with I|g=32 {I5} from (n,n'|g), which is too high. In the opinion of the evaluators, either the intensity of this |g ray in 1984Ar09 is incorrect or there is an alternate placement of 1139.95|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1485.949 
E$Other: 1485.86 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$+3 {I+10-1} for J(2601)=9/2 (1978Kr06) in {+71}Zn decay (4.14 h) 
M$large mixing ratio and |DJ|p suggest (E2+M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2+E3]
decay_comment:
$If M2, B(M2)(W.u.)=6.3 {I+32-26} exceeds RUL=1. If E3, B(E3)(W.u.)=3.9|*10{+3} {I+20-16} exceeds RUL=100 
E$1905.65|g to 3/2- seems too strong for pure M2 or pure E3, as B(M2)(W.u.) and B(E3)(W.u.) exceed respective RUL=1 and 100. It is possible that the main intensity of this |g is due to coincidence summing 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2.8 {I2} (1977SmZI) 
$1984Ar09 state that |g(|q) is not consistent with 7/2 to 3/2, pure quadrupole transition, but the authors do not list any data for angular distributions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g is placed from 2082 level in |b{+-} decay (4.140 h) and in the Adopted Gammas. Placement from 1498, 9/2- level to 910, 3/2- level in 1984Ar09 is highly unlikely with the currently adopted J|p values, thus treated as questionable placement by evaluators 
RI$1.4 {I2} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1241.18 
RI$branching is too high by a factor of |?30 as compared to |b{+-} decay data, value not used in Adopted Gammas. In the opinion of the evaluators, either the intensity of this |g ray in 1984Ar09 is incorrect or there is an alternate placement of 1240.83|g. Other: 1.2 {I2} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1631.19 
RI$0.46 {I5} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=787.78 
RI$0.82 {I9} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1905.34 
RI$2.2 {I9} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1169.59 
RI$1.1 {I2} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=771.55 
RI$0.24 {I2} (1977SmZI) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$branching is too high by a factor of |?5 as compared to |b{+-}decay data, value not used in Adopted Gammas. In the opinion of the evaluators, either the intensity of this |g ray in 1984Ar09 is incorrect or there is an alternate placement of 1139.95|g. Other: 0.73 {I7} (1977SmZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Other: B(E2)(W.u.)=5 {I2} (or B(E2)|^=0.0087 {I35}) (2010Di14) who also quote average B(E2)(W.u.)=4.6 {I6} from their data and those of 1972An17 
MR$deduced by the evaluators from T{-1/2}=1.5 ps {I7}, B(E2)|^=0.0080 {I13}, and adopted branching=91.98% {I23} for 511|g. This value differs from -0.37 {I6} from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay, which is adopted in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR$deduced by the evaluators from T{-1/2} and B(E2)|^=0.0020 {I3} with adopted branching(910|g)=0.914 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Measured B(E2)(W.u.)=9 {I5} (or B(E2)|^=0.024 {I13}) (2010Di14) who also quote average B(E2)(W.u.) from their data and those from 1972An17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=487.34 {I5}, I|g=67 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=487.3 {I2}, I|g=65 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=488.0 {I2}, I|g=63 {I13} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=488.0 {I10}, I|g=69 {I5} (1967Li01) 
MR$-0.024 {I13} or -3.1 {I2} from |g|g(|q) (1978Kr06); <0.12 deduced (1978Kr06) from known level lifetime and measured B(E2). 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.5 {I1} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2 |) 5/2 |) 3/2 sequence for 620-487 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
$E|g=121.48 {I5}, I|g=3.1 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=121.2 {I2}, I|g=3.4 {I10} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=122.2 {I2}, I|g=2.3 {I5} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=122.0 {I5}, I|g=3 {I1} (1967Li01) 
MR$-0.01 {I+13-16} or -1.7 {I+5-6} from |g|g(|q) (1978Kr06), but intensity balance at 389 level is in agreement with the lower value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=511.55 {I5}, I|g=30.5 {I20} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=511.4 {I2}, I|g=33 {I3} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=511.7 {I2}, I|g=28 {I6} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=512.0 {I10}, I|g=32 {I2} (1967Li01) 
MR$-0.37 {I6} or -10 {I+3-10} from |g|g(|q) (1978Kr06); 0.09 {I3} deduced (1978Kr06) from known level lifetime and measured B(E2); thus a preference for a lower |d value. Other: 0.28 {I1} (1975BeYD) with |d(M3/E2)=0.45 {I5} for 512|g, which seems unrealistic 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1970Zo01 only, with I|g|<0.02. This |g not seen by 2017Kr01, upper limit of I|g<0.01 was given. As mentioned in 1970Zo01, this line may be contributed by the {+71}Zn g.s. decay, where 910-keV level in {+71}Ga is also populated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=964.7 {I1}, I|g=4.6 {I5} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=964.6 {I1}, I|g=5.0 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=964.5 {I5}, I|g=3.9 {I12} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=963.0 {I15}, I|g=5 {I1} (1967Li01) 
$E|g=964.693 {I8}, deduced from level-energy difference, in good agreement with the measured E|g value for the doublet 
$Total I|g=5.35 {I5} for the doublet 
MR$+4.2 {I+14-10} or +0.58 {I+9-8} from 1978Kr06. From lifetime arguments for 965 level given by 1978Kr06, larger value is somewhat preferred 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
$E|g=142.60 {I5}, I|g=6.0 {I6} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=142.7 {I2}, I|g=5.7 {I20} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=143.4 {I3}, I|g=5.1 {I11} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=143.0 {I5}, I|g=7 {I2} (1967Li01) 
$(143|g)(965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.18 {I4} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
MR$-0.05 {I4} (1978Kr06) is the average of +0.01 {I6} and -0.11 {I6} from two different cascades. |d=-4.9 {I+12-22} or >12 are also possible solutions but the lower values are in better agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=596.07 {I7}, I|g=30 {I2} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=595.9 {I2}, I|g=29 {I3} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=596.2 {I2}, I|g=28 {I6} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=596.0 {I10}, I|g=31 {I2} (1967Li01) 
$(596|g)(122|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6}; A{-2}=-0.11 {I4} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(596|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.018 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.012 {I23}; A{-2}=-0.012 {I13} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(596|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.003 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I20} (1976Sa39) 
$(596|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1975BeYD) gives |d(M3/E2)=0.45 {I5}, which is unrealistic 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=620.19 {I5}, I|g=61 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=620.1 {I2}, I|g=57 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=620.4 {I2}, I|g=64 {I13} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=620.0 {I10}, I|g=62 {I4} (1967Li01) 
$(620|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.192 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I16}; A{-2}=-0.187 {I8} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$|d(E2/M1)=-1.4 {I1} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2 |) 7/2 |) 5/2 sequence for 387-620 cascade 
$|d(E2/M1)=+7.7 {I13} or +0.4 {I2} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2|)5/2|)3/2 sequence for 620-487 cascade 
$(620|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.199 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.007 {I10} (1976Sa39) 
$(620|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I4} (1969Kh10) 
MR$+0.72 {I+8-6} or +2.3 {I3} (1978Kr06). The smaller value is preferred from comparison of |d values deduced from different |g|g cascades. Other: 0.07 {I2} (1975BeYD) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1107.4 {I2}, I|g=2.2 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1107.2 {I2}, I|g=2.9 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=1108.2 {I10} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=1107.0 {I15}, I|g=3 {I1} (1967Li01) 
$E|g=1107.480 {I7}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by 0.154 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet 
$Total I|g=2.99 {I3} for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=964.6 {I3}, I|g=0.5 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=964.441 {I7}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by 0.230 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet 
$(965|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.020 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3}; A{-2}=+0.018 {I14} if A{-4}=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=988.6 {I2}, I|g=1.3 {I1} (1970Zo01, E|g=998.6 in Table 1 is a misprint) 
$E|g=988.6 {I1}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=987.8 {I5}, I|g=0.9 {I2} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=987.0 {I15}, I|g=1.0 {I5} (1967Li01) 
MR$+0.20 {I3} or -2.8 {I2} (1978Kr06) for J(1476 level)=5/2 
$(989|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.085 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.030 {I16}; A{-2}=-0.073 {I13} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 


