# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.016 {I18}; A{-4}=0.028 {I24} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1983Ko12); pol=-0.21 {I9} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1983Ko12); |a(K)exp=0.00057 {I6} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1988Ki04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.148 {I67}; A{-4}=-0.062 {I82} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1983Ko12); |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I35} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1988Ki04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.036 {I14}; A{-4}=0.023 {I19} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1983Ko12); pol=-0.32 {I7} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1983Ko12); |a(K)exp=0.00086 {I9}, weighted average of 0.00083 {I13} in {+109}Ag(|a,n|g) (1988Ki04) and 0.00088 {I12} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1988Ki04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 18.0 {I13} in {+109}Ag(|a,n|g) (1988Ki04) and 35.0 {I25} in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1988Ki04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$18% from I|g(521.94) in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1988Ki04) 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.012 in {+112}Cd(p,n|g) (1988Ki04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.62 {I10} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) and 0.96 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); pol=-0.037 {I23} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I11} in {+109}Ag(|a,n|g) (1988Ki04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.22 {I10} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: DCO=0.75 {I11} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.10 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.96 {I15} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: DCO=1.60 {I7} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=+0.08 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.02 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: DCO=0.70 {I14} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.057 {I25} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.69 {I14} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: DCO=1.7 {I4} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=+0.24 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.21 {I11} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: DCO=1.10 {I15} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.69 {I12} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: DCO=1.50 {I4} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=+0.06 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.16 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) pol=-0.02 {I5} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.02 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.98 {I7} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.10 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$45 {I5} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) 
M$DCO=1.85 {I18} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.46 {I11} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=+0.16 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.03 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.92 {I5} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.08 {I3} (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$24.1 {I19} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 
M$DCO=1.78 {I13} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.69 {I14} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=+0.12 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.97 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.03 {I6} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.03 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.32 {I14} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 
RI$11.8 {I8} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.98 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.05 {I10} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.01 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.80 {I5} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.98 {I7} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.13 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.94 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); pol=-0.05 {I5} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$DCO; 0.21 {I13} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.03 {I10} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.09 {I11} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.20 {I13} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.97 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.23 {I11} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$D from DCO=0.99 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); (M1) from assumed by the evaluators; band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$D from DCO=0.95 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); (M1) from assumed by the evaluators; band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$D from DCO=1.06 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) and 1.00 {I8} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); (M1) assumed by the evaluators from the band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$D from DCO=1.01 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 1.06 {I8} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); assumed (M1) by the evaluators from the band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.91 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.97 {I7} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g)(2011He04); pol=-0.09 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.86 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); pol=-0.04 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.10 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.90 {I10} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.14 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.89 {I7} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.54 {I13} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.89 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01); Also: 0.80 {I11} in {+110}Pd({+7}Li,5n|g) (2011He04); pol=-0.16 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+16}O,p3n|g) (2012Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.059 {I7}; |a(L)exp=0.0068 {I7}; |a(M)exp=0.0015 {I4} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.105 {I5}, A{-4}=0.004 {I6} (1978EmZT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I1}; |a(L)exp=0.021 {I3}; |a(M)exp=0.0056 {I6} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.073 {I5}, A{-4}=0.001 {I7} (1978EmZT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.0015 {I2} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.046 {I4}, A{-4}=0.000 {I8} (1978EmZT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.072 {I12}; |a(L)exp=0.0097 {I10} (1988Ki04); M1(+E2) with |d=-0.01 {I11} in the adopted gammas 
M$A{-2}=-0.254 {I37}, A{-4}=0.046 {I49} (1978EmZT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.17 {I4}; |a(L)exp=0.022 {I9} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.104 {I8}, A{-4}=0.023 {I12} (1978EmZT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(521.94)/I|g(326.19)=0.96 {I22} in the adopted gammas and I|g(326.19)=1.0 {I2} in 1988Ki04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.072 {I6}; |a(L)exp=0.0075 {I6}; |a(M)exp=0.0013 {I1} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.130 {I4}; A{-4}=0.022 {I6} (1983Ko12) 
MR$possible E2 admixture with |d=-0.03 {I12} or -0.05 {I5} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I1} (1988Ki04) 
I(187.8|g)/I(262.7|g)=1.32 {i4} (1976Io04) 
187.8|g decays to 162-keV level and not to 155.5-keV level as stated by 1976Io04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.041 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.0054 {I10}; |a(M)exp=0.0013 {I3} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.203 {I9}; A{-4}=-0.007 {I11} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I4} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.287 {I52}; A{-4}=0.005 {I66} (1983Ko12) 
M$possible E2 admixture with |d=-0.01 {I10} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0127 {I12} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.156 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I30} (1983Ko12) or A{-2}=0.134 {I10}, A{-4}=0.006 {I13} (1983Ko12) 
M$possible E2 admixture with |d=-0.03 {I12} or -0.05 {I5} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0045 {I4} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.082 {I11}, A{-4}=0.032 {I14} (1983Ko12) or A{-2}=-0.069 {I5}, A{-4}=0.042 {I6} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.19 {I4} (1983Ko12) 
MR$Also: 0.09 (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00099 {I15} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.092 {I18}, A{-4}=0.004 {I23} (1983Ko12) or A{-2}=-0.079 {I7}, A{-4}=0.010 {I9} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=0.21 {I7} (1983Ko12); Also: 0.11 {I3} (1983Ko12) 
MR$Also: 0.11 {I2} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0039 {I15} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.154 {I19}; A{-4}=0.056 {I25} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.10 {I10} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.024 {I5} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.171 {I14}; A{-4}=0.006 {I18} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.35 {I6} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00063 {I7} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.086 {I20}; A{-4}=0.029 {I27} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.20 {I10} (1983Ko12) 
M$possible M2 admixture with |d=0.00 {I12} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.009 {I1} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.159 {I19}; A{-4}=0.009 {I25} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.24 {I11} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00057 {I6} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.016 {I18}; A{-4}=0.028 {I24} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.21 {I9} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.002 {I4} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=0.148 {I67}, A{-4}=-0.062 {I82} (1983Ko12); Possible E2 admixture with |d=0.0 -3+95 (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00088 {I12} (1988Ki04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.036 {I14}; A{-4}=0.023 {I19} (1983Ko12) 
M$p{-exp}=-0.32 {I7} (1983Ko12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$ uncertainty quoted in 2011He04 is 0.1, which seems unrealistically small. The evaluators assign 1.0 
M$DCO=0.88 {I16} (2011He04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M,E$from {+113}In IT decay. A weak E5 admixture could not be excluded from |a(K)exp (1985HaZA), not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E$from 2000He14 evaluation 
RI$From I|g(391)=[100.0 - I(|g+ce)(646)] / [1 + |a(391)]; the uncertainty is all from the 0.26% uncertainty in (1 + |a). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.437 {i7}, |a(exp)=0.540 {i7}, |a(K)exp/|a(L+...)exp=4.21 {i8} (1971Ha18); |a(L)exp/|a(M)exp, |a(L)exp/|a(n)exp, |a(M)exp/|a(n)exp (1972Ko38). Others: 1970Go48, 1970Le07, 1971GoYM, 1985HaZA. 
CC$|a and |a{-K} are from 1985HaZA evaluation of measured values; these values average 3% lower than the theoretical values of 1978Ro21. The |a{-L} and |a{-M} were then computed as 3% lower than the corresponding theoretical values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E$From 1997HeZZ. 
RI$From I|g(391)=[100.0 - I(|g+ce)(646)] / [1 + |a(391)]; the uncertainty is all from the 0.26% uncertainty in (1 + |a). 
CC$|a(K) and |a are from 1985HaZA evaluation of measured values; these values average 3% lower than the theoretical values of 1978Ro21. The |a(L) and |a(M) were then computed as 3% lower than the corresponding theoretical values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Based on value of 255.126 {I10} (1973In06) scaled by the evaluator by the ratio E|g(391,here)/E|g(391,1973In06). 
RI$From I|g(255)/I|g(392)=0.0325 {I12} from Limited Relative Statistical Weight analysis of 0.0333 {I13} (1973In06), 0.0285 {I9} (1978He08), 0.0337 8 (1993Mu14), and 0.0327 {I8} (1994DeZX). Others: 0.030 {I3} (1958Gi06), 0.027 {I2} (1959Bu08), 0.028 {I1} (1961Gr11), 0.029 {I3} (1967Bo18), 0.0322 (1968Fo07), and 0.0285 {I7} (1976De35 from same data as 1978He08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Calculated from level energies; |g not observed in this decay. 
RI$From I|g(382)/I|g(638)=6.2/100 from Adopted |g data in 1998Bl04 evaluation and based on observed decay of this level in {+113}Cd(p,n|g) (1976Di03,1974Ki02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.47 {I12} 
E$placed as deexciting the 2652 level and feeding the 2396 level by 1997Ch01, placed from this level by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$evaluated I|g (absolute)=64.85 {I25} (2012Lu15) 
CC$Compilers' note: 2012Lu15 give |a(391.70)=0.542 {I6} which is from BrIcc no-hole calculation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 3.261 {I36} and 3.253 {I26} from two separate measurements (2012Lu15, re-analyzed in 2014Lu12). The uncorrected values in 2012Lu15 were 3.237 {I30} and 3.229 {I21}. 
RI$evaluated relative I|g=3.25 {I4}, I|g (absolute)=2.108 {I27} (2012Lu15, corrected in 2014Lu12), but the compilers obtain I|g(absolute)=2.095 {I26} with normalization factor of 0.6447 {I33} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 3.237 {I30} and 3.229 {I21} from two separate measurements (2012Lu15) 
RI$evaluated relative I|g=3.23 {I3}, I|g (absolute)=2.095 {I21} (2012Lu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_comment:
RI$from 1994Co02 
EKC$|a(K)exp (1976Re14) is 19% smaller than the theoretical value 
CC$from a comparison of %IT deduced from %I|g(190|g)(1+|a) with the value deduced from %IT=100-%I|g(190|g) |* I|g(725|g)/I|g(190|g). The E4 theory is 5.15 (uncorrected), and 5.02 corrected with the prescription of 1990Ne01. See adopted levels for the intensity ratio data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ce data; I|g for M1 
$|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp=11.0 {i17}, |a(L1)exp/|a(L3)exp>20, |a(L2)exp/|a(M1)exp=0.58 {i10}, |a(M1)exp/|a(M3)exp>5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ce data; I|g for M1 
$|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp=10.0 {i19}, |a(L1)exp/|a(L3)exp>23, |a(L2)exp/|a(M1)exp=0.33 {i6}, |a(M1)exp/|a(M2)exp>9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ce data; I|g for M1 
$|a(L1)exp/|a(L2)exp=11.8 {i23}, |a(L1)exp/|a(L3)exp>37, |a(L2)exp/|a(M1)exp=0.55 {i11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=29.9 {I12} for doubly placed transition and I|g=14.6 {I18} deduced for placement from 497 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
$I|g corrected to 4602 {I20} (1978He08) from the previous value of 100 in 2012Bl10 evaluation. 
$|d(E5/M4)<0.36 by fitting all the available ce data for K-shell conversion coefficients and subshell ratios by the BrIccMixing code. However, |d(E5/M4)=0.36 gives an unrealistically large B(E5)(W.u.) value of 2.1|*10{+4}. Considering maximum B(E5)(W.u.)=143 {I25} (for a transition in {+199}Hg) in the ENSDF database, |d(E5/M4) should be less than 0.03, which does not change the total conversion coefficient. 
E$from 1974HeYW. Others: 336.301 {I3} (1978He08), 336.23 {I5} (1967Ba18), 336.25 {I10} (1967Mu08) 
RI$per 1|*10{+4} decays: 4590 {I10} (1974Ha39); 4602 {I20} (1978He08, transient equilibrium, measured I|g=4969 {I22} measured) 
$K:L:M+=100 {I9}:21 {I2}:3 {I1} (1974Bo26), 100:22 {I1}:4 {I1} (1967Ba18) 
$|a(K)exp=0.843 {I12} and |a(total)exp=1.073 {I14} (1974Ha39, in {+115}In IT decay); 0.91 {I8} (1974Bo26), 0.90 {I9} (1967Mc13), 0.91 {I6} (1966Gr14), 0.84 {I9} (1963Ha24). Others: 1955Es15, 1955Va04, 1966Jh01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=260.85 {I6}, I|g=3.86 {I25} relative to 100 for 336|g (1974HeYW) 
MR$from (231|g)(261|g)(|q) (1973Ba29): A{-2}=-0.260 {I35}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I47}. Other: -0.08 {I9} from (267|g)(231|g)(|q) (1973Ba29). Other |g|g(|q) data: 1970Be79, 1963Ha24. From |a(K)exp, mult=M1+E2, |d<1.5 
$|a(K)exp=0.035 {I5} (1967Ba18). Other: 0.043 {I9} (1973Is03) 
$Other |d=-0.08 {I9} (1973Ba29), 267|g(261|g)(|q); 1970Be79, 1963Ha24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=231.41 {I3}, I|g=1.40 {I11} relative to 100 for 336|g (1974HeYW) 
$|a(K)exp=0.016 {I5} (1967Ba18) 
$Analog: HF(E1,87|g,{+111}Ag)=1.2|*10{+6} W.u. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=492.274 {I35}, I|g=17.0 {I14} relative to 100 for 336|g (1974HeYW) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0019 {I3} 
$2% M2 admixture deduced from |a(K)exp=0.0028 (1967Ba18); pure E1 if |a(K)exp=0.0019 (1973Is03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g corrected to 42.1 {I3} (1978He08) from previous value of 1.534 {I11} in 2012Bl10 evaluation. 
E$unweighted average of 35.514 {I3} (1978He08) and 35.63 {I5} (1967Ba18) 
$(35.6|g)(231.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.021 {I8} (1975Bo29) 
$(35.6|g)(492.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.096 {I15} (1975Bo29) 
$L1:L2:L3:M=100 {I10}:51 {I13}:62 {I9}:57 {I17} (1967Ba18) 
$|a(K)exp=ce(K)/I|g (coin with 492|g) corrected for |w(K): 8.2 {I8} (1974Bo26), 8.5 {I4} (1969Ca16), 7.7 {I8} (1967Mc13), 9.6 {I12} (1966Gr14). Others: 1963Ha24, 1964Bo19, 1964Ta09 
MR$deduced in the present update from a fit to all the available K-conversion coefficients, subshell ratios, and the |d(E2/M1) value in 1977Kr13 evaluation using the BrIccMixing code. Previous value in 2012Bl10 was -0.173 {I16}, where magnitude was deduced from only the L1/L3 ratio in 1967Ba18. Sign of |d is from |g|g(|q). |d=-0.20 {I1} (1977Kr13 evaluation) weighted average of |d values from 1975Bo29, 1973Ba29, 1970Be79, 1968Ba32 and 1963Ha24. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=266.90 {I8}, I|g=0.18 {I1} relative to 100 for 336|g (1974HeYW) 
$HF(E1,267|g)=2.2|*10{+7} W.u. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=527.807 {I35}, I|g=3.86 {I25} relative to 100 for 336|g (1974HeYW) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I3} (1967Ba18), 0.0017 {I1} (1973Is03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E others: 933.81 {I4} (1974HeYW), 933.6 {I1} (1973Se06) 
MR +0.02 {I5} (1975Ro32) oriented 44.6-d {+115}Cd decay, 934|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other: 484.35 {I15} (1973Se06) 
MR from (484|g)(934|g)(|q): 1955Va04, 1963Va06, 1964Pa18, 1973Ko23, 1973Se06, 1973St13, 1975Bo29; see 1977Kr13 evaluation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$from 1974HeYW 
M$deduced from |a(K)exp, |a(exp), K/(L+M) data; upper limit E5 admixture=3.5% {I15} from exp vs theory (1974Ha39) 
From (ce(K))(K| x ray)-coin. Other: 0.839 {I19} from |a(exp), ce-ratio data |a(exp)=1.071 {I14} (ce)(K| x ray)-coin, 1.076 {I19} from |a(K)exp, ce-ratio data; weighted av: 1.073 {I14} 
L1:L2:L3=100:51.7 {I10}:25.6 {I5} (1975Ma32) s; deviation of relative L2-subshell intensity from M4 theory is attributed by 1975Ma32 to exp analysis; M, N, O intensity data are compared with theory 
K/L+M+=3.63 {I7} (1974Ha39) s. Other: 3.7 {I8} (1966Gr14) 
HF(M4,336|g)=0.116 W.u.; compared with: HF(M4,392|g,{+113}In)=0.123 W.u., HF(M4,537|g,{+111}In)=0.115 W.u. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from B(E2)=0.0096 {I13}, T{-1/2}=0.059 ps {I15}, I|g(1463|g)-branching=94.2%. Other: -0.30 {I+15-35} from A{-2}=-0.08 {I7} (1976Tu02) 1463|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E from 1970AlZJ, cryst. Other: 162.39 {I2} (1972Ra39) semi 
M$K/(L+M)=1.6 {I2} (1964Ca14) 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from Figure 1, not included in Table 1 of 2023Xu01 
E$energy must be a typo, as it does not fit into level scheme (compiler's note). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$273.36 {I2} (1979Gl09), 273.28 {I6} (1975Ta06), 273.33 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
MR$-0.10 {I2} or -1.40 {I4} (1979Gl09) from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from internal conversion data and |g|g(|q) 
EKC$from K| x ray/I|g (1968Pa01), other: 1.6 {I6} (1967Ba18) 
CC$K:L:M+N=100 {I15}:33 {I1}:14 {I4} (1967Ba18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
RI I|g(315|g)/I|g(158|g)=1.21 {I12} (1970Ba62) 
1988FuZW report a ratio of 1/1.6 for I|g(315)({+117}In)/I|g(552). This ratio has to be 1 at equilibrium. No explanation is found. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E not resolved from intense 1318|g in authors' singles spectrum. 
RI 6.0 {I12} (1974Mc09), 2.7 {I4} (1976Sc30); I|g(1317+1318) =34 {I2} (1974Mc09), 24 {I2} (1976Sc30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI divided from 5.7 {I17} of weighted av of 7.7 {I8} (1976Sc30) and 1.2 {I2} (1974Mc09). Value from 1974Mc09 was given for a composite peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The energy fit is poor. Not included in the least-squares fit for E(level). From the E(level) difference one expects E|g =1148.59 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E 324.976 {I13} measured by crystal spectrometer (1979Bo26) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I2} 
CC$for |d=1.0, uncertainty chosen to overlap M1, E2 theory values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 14.3 {I16} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 17 {I7} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 37 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 34 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 35 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 56 {I6} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 35 {I9} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 43.5 {I8} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from energy of conversion electron, observed in delayed ce spectrum in {+123}In IT decay 
M$suggested by the absence of crossover transition between 2078 level and 1166 level in {+123}In IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 17 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 18 {I9} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 60 {I5} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 64 {I9} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 21 {I2} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 27 {I9} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 39 {I6} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 42 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 4.6 {I21} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 3.6 {I18} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 62 {I13} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 65 {I13} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 37 {I3} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 40.0 {I18} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 44 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 49 {I4} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 10.0 {I3} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (2.10 s) and 10.9 {I18} from {+123}Cd |b{+-} decay (1.80 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. This |g-ray was not observed by 2004Sc42 due to its low expected relative intensity of |?6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from energy of conversion electron, observed in delayed ce spectrum with electron energy of 27.5 {I5} corresponding to ce(L) line of 31.5|g 
RI$from I(|g+ce) intensity balance, I(889.7|g)=107, an di(1019.0|g)=40 
M$suggested by the absence of crossover transition between 2078 level and 1166 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(241.7)/I|g(179.3|g)=0.29 {I11} from I|g data; 0.19 listed in authors' Fig. 11, probably taken from I|g(241.7|g)/I|g(179.3|g)=0.18, or I(|g+ce)(241.7|g)/I(|g+ce)(179.3|g)=0.19 in authors' earlier work 2016Ba41 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$According to 1986Ho24 and 1989Hu03, 2147-keV |g-ray decays directly to the ground state, but 1987Sp09 suggest the |g-ray as decaying from 2507-keV level from Q{-|b} measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 1986Ho24 and 1986Go10 report absolute intensity of this transition as 12% {I2}. But their results seem to include both components of 0.65 s and 0.47 s decays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$According to 1986Ho24 and 1989Hu03, 2147-keV |g-ray decays directly to the ground state, but 1987Sp09 suggest the |g-ray as that decaying from 2507-keV level from Q{-|b} measurement. The 2507-keV level, however, is not reported in 1989Hu03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp in {+129}In IT decay (8.7 |ms) gives M2 or E3; former is more likely from systematics and configuration assignments to levels involved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$from {+129}In IT decay (110 ms) (2004Sc42,1998FoZY) 
M$M2 or E3 from observation of K-x rays (2004Ga24,1998FoZY), with preference for E3 from systematics of neighboring nuclides 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
$EG=333.9 4, IG=17.5 8 (2003DiZY), doublet, strong component decaying from 8.7-US isomer, weak component decaying with T=242 ms 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
E$333.8 {I5} (2012Ka36) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.08 {I2} gives M2 or E3; former more likely from systematics and configuration assignments to levels involved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M$M2 or E3 from observation of K-x rays (2004Ga24,1998FoZY), with preference for E3 from systematics of neighboring nuclides 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=6.3 {I9} for 1221.6 which is the only transition feeding this level in the decay of 3/2+ isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$100-6.3 {I9}; the latter is contributed by the decay of 3/2+ isomer; based on compilers' assignment of a 1217 level populated in the decay of the 3/2+ isomer rather than the 11/2- isomer as implied by 2015Ta13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_comment:
RI$ an upper limit, since no |g to the (21/2+) level was observed 
M$from 2009Go40, based on the similarities between deduced B(E4) strength with those in {+132}Sn and {+98}Cd 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from comparison to Weisskopf single-particle estimates, only E2 multipolarity is consistent with expected single particle decay strength (2019Ph02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Value of 1997Ju01 is too large for placement from 8117 level. I|g possibly includes component from 10571 reported by 1997JeZZ. I|g=9.7 {I3} (1997JeZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From level-energy differences by evaluators. E|g=12.8 keV in {+106}Cd(|a,n|g) (seen only in |g|g coinc). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From (|a,n|g) (1999Da05) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.17 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.03{i2} (1981JoZX), a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.37 {i16} (1999Da05) supports D transition, while |a(K)exp=0.0043 {i14} (1999Da05) and |a(K)exp=0.0048 {i9} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) are consistent with M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 664.5 {i3}(1982Jo03), 664.6 {i5} (1976Ox01), 664.2 {i2} (2002Re14) in {+109}Sb |e decay, 664.58 {i10} (1999Da05), 664.5 {i4} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.33 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.05 {i2} (1981JoZX), a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.50 {i12}; |a(K)exp=0.0025 {i8} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.0030 {i6} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 678.6 {i3} (1982Jo03), 678.3 {i3} (2002Re14) in {+109}Sb |e decay, 678.7 {i2} (1976Ma09), 678.73 {i25} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 
RI$other: 27 {I3} ({+106}Cd(|a,n|g) in (1999Da05)) and 13 {I7} in Coulomb excitation (2012Di13) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.05 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.01{i3} (1981JoZX) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 925.4 {i3} (1982Jo03), 925.4 {i3} (1976Ox01), 925.0 {i3} (2002Re14) in {+109}Sb |e decay, 925.6 {i5} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.03 {i1}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.01 {i1} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0016 {i6} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.20 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.02 {i1} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I4} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1067.7 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.36 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.10 {i3} (1981JoZX), a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.22 {i20}, |a(K)exp=0.0011 {i4} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1078.7 {i10} (1976Ma09), 1078.05 {i10} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 1078.0 {i3} (1982Jo03) in {+109}Sb |e decay, 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.82 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.22 {i5} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0010 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.24 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.19 {i3} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0009 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1243.80 {i15}(1976Ma09), 1243.83 {i10} (1999Da05) , 1243.4 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g), 1243.8 {i5} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.25 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.18 {i3} (1981JoZX) |a(K)exp=0.0007 {i2} (1999Da05),|a(K)exp=0.0006 {i2} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1255.8 {i2} (1976Ma09), 1255.93 {i13} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 1255.8 {i3} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), 1256.0 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g), 1255.5 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.15 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.20 {i3} (1981JoZX) in (|a,n|g) a{-2}/a{-0}=0.158 {i11}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.006 {i27} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0019 {i6} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.0016 {i3} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1343.5 {i3} (1982Jo03), 1343.7 {i2} (1976Ma09), 1343.55 {i25} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 1343.7 {i3} (2002Re14) in {+109}Sb ec decay 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.23 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.02 {i3} (1981JoZX) |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.00060 {I13}(1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 936.2 {i3} (2002Re14) in {+109}Sb |e decay, 935.8 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 673.0 {i4} (1976Ma09), 672.45 {i10} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 672.0 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {i16} (1999Da05), mul=D based on DCO ratios in (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 690.42 {i20} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 690.1 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {i14} (1999Da05), mul=Q based on DCO ratios in (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.296 {i14}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.14 {i3} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0018 {i6} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.0017 {i3} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1081.4 {i15} (1976Ma09), 1081.04 {120} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 1081.2 {i5} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), 1081.2 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g), 1080.7 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.22 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.07 {i7} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), |a(K)exp=0.0009 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 950.25 {i15} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 950.8 {i5} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), 950.1 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g), 949.7 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.26 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.24 {i12}, |DJ=0 possible (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), R(DCO)=1.03 {i18} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 965.2 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g), 962.2 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g), 964.8 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.25 {i7}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.05 {i10} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g), R(DCO)=0.99 {i12} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1230.4 {i3} (1999Da05)in (|a,n|g), 1230.3 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g), 1229.9 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g), 1230.3 {i5} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.22 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.014 {i15} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 157.8 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g), 158.4 {i3} (1995Ka09) in (HI,xn|g), 158.4 {i3} (1999Da05) in (|a,n|g) 
M$based on DCO ratios in (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43) 
M$based on DCO ratios in (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43); R(DCO)=0.73 {i5} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$based on DCO ratios in (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43); a{-2}/a{-0}=0.06 {i15}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.020 {i20} (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others:389.9 {i3} (1996Ch37) in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g),390.0 (1979Ha12) in (|a,3n|g) 
M$MUL=E2 from (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43) based on DCO ratios; in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g) (1996Ch37) MUL=(M1), based on R(DCO)=1.06 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$based on DCO ratios in (HI,xn|g) (1996Ka43), mul=M1+E2 from R(DCO)=0.47 {i6} in {+94}Mo({+19}F,p3n|g) (1996Ch37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.51 {I5}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$from Adopted gammas 
TI$from %I|b(|e+|b{++})(gs)/%I|b(|e+|b{++})(13.96-keV level)=4, as suggested in 2002Re14 and the decay scheme 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
%I|g=2.99 {I24}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$Others: 544.4 {I3} (2002Re14) and 544.8 {i3} (1982Jo03) 
RI$Other: 10.6 {i5} (1982Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
%I|g=6.4 {I7}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$Others: 664.2 {I3} (2002Re14), 664.5 {i3} (1982Jo03), and 664.6 {i5} (1976Ox01) 
RI$Others: 63 {i4} (1982Jo03), 51 {i7} (1976Ox01, may combine 664.0 |g + 664.2|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=5.4 {I5}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$Others: 678.6 {I3} (2002Re14) abd 678.6 {i3} (1982Jo03) 
RI$Other: 19 {i1} (1982Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=26.7 {I21}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$Others: 925.0 {I3} (2002Re14), 925.4 {i3} (1982Jo03), 925.4 {i3} (1976Ox01) 
RI$Others: 100 (1982Jo03, 1976Ox01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=18.1 {I15}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$Others: 1061.7 {i3} (1982Jo03), 1061.6 {i3} (1976Ox01) 
RI$Others: 75 {i5} (1982Jo03), 74 {i4} (1976Ox01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.230 {I24}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$From adopted gammas. Other: 1064 keV (2012Re14) 
RI$From adopted gammas. Authors in 2002Re14 adopted a value based on branching ratio from in-beam |g-ray studies of 1999Da05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.01 {I9}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$Others: 1078 keV (2012Re14) and 1078.0 keV {i3} (1982Jo03) 
RI$Other: 3.9 {i2} (1982Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.61 {I6}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$From adopted gammas. Others: 1343.7 keV 3 (2012Re14) and 1343.5 {i3} (1982Jo03) 
RI$Other: 2.2 {i2} (1982Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
%I|g=7.6 {I6}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$From adopted gammas. Others: 1496.1 keV 3 (2012Re14) and 1495.8 {i3} (1982Jo03) 
RI$Other: 30 {i2} (1982Jo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 544.9 {i2} (1976Ma09), 543.0 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 32 {i3} (1976Ma09), 32.8 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.17 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.03{i2} (1981JoZX); a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.37 {i16}, |a(K)exp=0.0043 {i14} (1999Da05); |a(K)exp=0.0048 {i9} (1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 664.5 {i4} (1976Ma09), 664.1 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 152 {i15} (1976Ma09), 32.8 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.33 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.05 {i2} (1981JoZX); a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.50 {i12}, |a(K)exp=0.0025 {i8} (1999Da05); |a(K)exp=0.0030 {i6} (1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 678.7 {i2} (1976Ma09), 678.7 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 34 {i3} (1976Ma09), 8.2 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.05 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.01{i3} (1981JoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 925.6 (1976Ma09), 925.3 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 33 (1976Ma09), 13.1 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.03 {i1}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.01 {i1} (1981JoZX) |a(K)exp=0.0016 {i6} (1999Da05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1062.8 (1976Ma09), 1062.8 (1996ViZZ); composite |g 
RI$Others: 20 (1976Ma09), 13 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.36 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.10 {i3} (1981JoZX); a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.22 {i20}, |a(K)exp=0.0011 {i4} (1999Da05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1078.7 {i10} (1976Ma09), 1080.7 (1996ViZZ); composite |g 
RI$Others: 62 (1976Ma09), 63.9 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.82 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.22 {i5} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0010 {i3} (1999Da05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1239.5 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Other: 55.8 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.24 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.19 {i3} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0009 {i3} (1999Da05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1243.80 {i15} (1976Ma09), 1243.5 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 237 {i60} (1976Ma09), 185 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.25 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.18 {i3} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0007 {i2} (1999Da05),|a(K)exp=0.0006 {i2} (1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1255.8 {i2} (1976Ma09), 1255.8 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 100 (1976Ma09), 100 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.15 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.20 {i3} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0019 {i6} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.0016 {i3} (1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1343.7 {i2} (1976Ma09), 1343.7 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 31 {i5} (1976Ma09), 10.7 (1996ViZZ) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.23 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.02 {i3} (1981JoZX), |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.00060 {I13}(1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 805.1 (1976Ma09), 804.8 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 26 (1976Ma09), 35 (1996ViZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {i6} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.0022 {i4} (1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 673.0 {i4} (1976Ma09), 672.9 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 38 {i4} (1976Ma09), 31.9 (1996ViZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {i16} (1999Da05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 813.4 {i2} (1976Ma09), 812.9 (1996ViZZ) 
RI$Others: 25 {i3} (1976Ma09), 19.5 (1996ViZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0026 {i8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 832.7 (1976Ma09), 832.2 (1996ViZZ); composite |g 
RI$Others: 63 (1976Ma09), 57.0 (1996ViZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {i6} (1999Da05), |a(K)exp=0.0017 {i3} (1976Ma09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1081.4 {i15} (1976Ma09), 1080.7 (1996ViZZ); composite |g 
RI$Others: 62 (1976Ma09), 63.9 (1996ViZZ) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0009 {i3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+108}Cd(|a,2n|g) 
M$DCO=0.96 {I8}; A{-2}=+0.29 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (2005Wo03); |a(K)exp=1.16|*10{+-3}; A{-2}=0.314 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.20 {I13}; A{-2}=+0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I9}; |a(K)exp=0.030 {I12}; A{-2}=0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I10} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From {+108}Cd(|a,2n|g) 
M$DCO=1.18 {I25}; A{-2}=+0.35 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}; |a(K)exp=0.038 {I8}; A{-2}=0.382 {I11}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.72 {I09}; A{-2}=-0.29 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1}; |a(K)exp=0.67|*10{+-3} {I8} for unresolved 1209.4-1212.0 doublet in 1980Va13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.3 {I3}; A{-2}=+0.07 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I3}; 0.07|<|a|<1.5 deduced from intensity balance by the authors in 1980Va13. |a=1.5 {I2} by the evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.36 {I15}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.59|*10{+-3} {I10}; A{-2}=0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} in 1980Va13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+108}Cd(|a,2n|g) 
M$DCO=1.13 {I23}; |a(K)exp=0.15 {I3}; A{-2}=-0.090 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1980Va13) 
MR$Other: 0.06 {I3} (1986Ka25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.64 {I14}; A{-2}=+0.26 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7}; |a(K)exp=0.57|*10{+-3} {I12}; A{-2}=0.42 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I8} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.94 {I18}; A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2}; |a(K)exp=0.75|*10{+-3} {I15}; A{-2}=0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.9 {I3}; A{-2}=+0.19 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.56|*10{+-3} {I14}; A{-2}=0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.67|*10{+-3} {I8} for unresolved 1209.4-1212.0 doublet; A{-2}=-0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Doublet with 283 keV transition in {+110}In 
M$|a(K)exp=0.030 {I12}; A{-2}=0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.67|*10{+-3} {I8} for unresolved 1209.4-1212.0 doublet; A{-2}=0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$0.07|<|a|<1.5 deduced from intensity balance by the authors, |a=1.5 {I2} by the evaluators; A{-2}=-0.147 {I12}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From 2018Co07. Two |g rays with energies of 1243.3 and 1246.4 keV are known to depopulate the 2455.6- and 2458.42-keV levels in {+110}Sn, but those cannot be resolved in 2018Co07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$from 1984Pr06 in (|a,n|g). Other: 978.7 {i3} (1976Ma09) in (|a,n|g), 978 {i1} (1985Az03) in ({+3}He,|a|g), 979.6 {i5} (1972Br38) in IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$reported by 1972Si28 and 1974De34 (I|g is inconsistent) but not by 1976Wi10 in |e decay. I|g/I|g(999)<1.6 {i3} from in-beam studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$branching: I|g(389|g):I|g(489|g):I|g(644|g)=8.8:100:4.5 (1976Wi10), 6.2 {I17}:100:2.5 {I10} (1972Si28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Si28; unobserved by 1976Wi10 
RI$I|g(1150|g)/I|g(154|g)=0.040 {I5} (1972Si28), 0.082 {I18} (1974De34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$contaminated by an impurity 
M$expected as hindered E2 if it is analogous to 280 transition in {+110}Sn from 6+ to 4+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00060 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.64 {I8} and A{-4}=-0.82 {I8} in Coulomb excitation (2011Wa15); Alternatively, A{-2}=0.90 {I6} and A{-4}=-0.71 {I6} in Coulomb excitation (2011Wa15). A{-2}=0.243 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.048 {I9} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); DCO=1.01 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); P|g=0.39 in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07) and +0.05 {I2} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$928 in {+100}Mo({+16}O,4n|g),{+98}Mo({+16}O,2n|g) (1988Ha20) 
M$from |g(|q) in {+112}Sn(n,n'|g) (2005Ku28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce measurements in {+112}Sn(p,p'|g) (1981Ba05) 
TI$from Ice(K)(2190.9|g)/Ice(K)(934.12|g)=0.55 {I10} in {+112}Sn(p,p'|g) (1981Ba05), |a(K)(934.12|g)=0.001301 {I19}, I|g(934.12|g)=100 and |W{-K}/|W{-T}=0.8942 (2008Ki07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$993 in {+113}In(p,2n|g) (1969Ya05) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0014 in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.236 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.050 {I9} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); DCO=1.03 {I5} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); P|g=+0.07 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) and P|g=0.37 in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I3} and A{-4}=0.03 {I4} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); P|g=0.34 {I9} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); |a(K)exp<0.0005 in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.218 {I11} and A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); P|g=0.53 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.033 {I5} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); Also, A{-2}=0.220 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g)(1980Va13); DCO=1.11 {I6} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) and P|g=0.31 {I6} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13) and +0.06 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I3} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); A{-2}=0.365 {I8} and A{-4}=0.00 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); P|g=0.67 {I5} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$807 {I1} in {+113}In(p,2n|g) (1969Ya05) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00070 {I15} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); A{-2}=-0.233 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); P|g=0.37 {I5} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13) and +0.06 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); DCO=0.71 {I13} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.32 {I6} and A{-4}=-0.18 {I10} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); P|g=0.49 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.34 {I2} and A{-4}=0.71 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); P|g=0.71 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0009 {I4} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.38 {I7} and A{-4}=-0.12 {I13} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); P|g=0.8 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$assigned by the evaluators; M1+E2 with |d=0.48 {I6} in {+112}Sn(n,n'|g) (2005Ku28) is not consistent with the J|p differences 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.375 {I9} and A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); DCO=0.93 {I9} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); P|g=0.65 {I6} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07) and +0.11 {I4} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); A{-2}=0.344 {I15} and A{-4}=-0.14 {I3} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); P|g=0.72 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I4} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.366 {I12} and A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); DCO=1.04 {I10} for 741.7|g+744.6|g in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); P|g=0.53 {I5} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07) and +0.25 {I11} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); A{-2}=0.34 {I3} and A{-4}=-0.13 {I3} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); P|g=0.72 {I8} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1980Va13); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I6} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.27 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); DCO=1.04 {I10} for 741.7+744.6 in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); P|g=0.61 {I12} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07) and +0.27 {I11} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I7} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); A{-2}=0.40 {I6} and A{-4}=-0.12 {I10} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); P|g=0.7 {I2} in {+110}Cd(|a,2n|g) (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 
M$DCO=0.99 {I12} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); Pol{-DCO}=+0.08 {I3} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 
M$DCO=1.05 {I13} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); Pol{-DCO}=+0.24 {I14} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 
M$DCO=1.06 {I19} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45); Pol{-DCO}=+0.22 {I14} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 
M$DCO=1.00 {I21} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 
M$DCO=1.13 {I23} in {+100}Mo({+20}Ne,|a4n|g) (2007Ga45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$558.4 keV {I2} in 1975WiZX,1976Wi10 
E$transition placed by the evaluators on the basis of the observed |g-ray in 1975WiZX,1976Wi10 and the adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.243 {I5} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.048 {I9} (1979Br07); P|g=0.39 (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.00060 {I8} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.236 {I5} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.050 {I9} (1979Br07); P|g=0.37 (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0014 (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I3} (1980Va13); A{-4}=0.03 {I4} (1980Va13); P|g=0.34 {I9} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp<0.0005 (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.218 {I11} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} (1979Br07); P|g=0.53 {I8} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} (1979Br07); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.220 {I4} (1980Va13); A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} (1980Va13); P|g=0.31 {I6} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp=0.033 {I5} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.365 {I8} (1980Va13); A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1980Va13); P|g=0.67 {I5} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp=0.017 {I3} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.233 {I5} (1980Va13); A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}(1980Va13); P|g=0.37 {I5} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp=0.00070 {I15} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.32 {I6} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.18 {I10} (1979Br07); P|g=0.49 {I8} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.34 {I2} (1979Br07); A{-4}=0.71 {I8} (1979Br07); P|g=0.71 {I8} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I8} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.38 {I7} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.12 {I13} (1979Br07); P|g=0.8 {I2} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0009 {I4} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.021 {I6} (1980Va13); A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1980Va13); P|g=-0.43 {I5} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I7} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.375 {I9} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} (1979Br07); P|g=0.65 {I6} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.344 {I15} (1980Va13); A{-4}=-0.14 {I3} (1980Va13); P|g=0.72 {I8} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.366 {I12} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} (1979Br07); P|g=0.53 {I5} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I4} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.34 {I3} (1980Va13); A{-4}=-0.13 {I3} (1980Va13); P|g=0.80 {I10} P|g=0.72 {I8} (1980Va13); |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} (1980Va13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I4} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1979Br07); P|g=0.61 {I12} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I6} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I6} (1979Br07); A{-4}=-0.12 {I10} (1979Br07); P|g=0.7 {I2} (1979Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I7} (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.64 {I8} (2011Wa15) and A{-4}=-0.82 {I8} (2011Wa15); Also: A{-2}=0.90 {I6} (2011Wa15) and A{-4}=-0.71 {I6} (2011Wa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty not listed by 2007Ga45, assumed as 0.3 keV by evaluators for least-squares fit procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$assigned by the evaluators; Other: M1+E2 with |d=0.48 {I6} in {+112}Sn(n,n'|g) (2005Ku28) is not consistent with the J|p assignments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+112}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Aug 2014 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
M,MR$see {+113}Sn IT decay (21.4 min) 
BM3W$the calculated B(E4)(W.u.) gives 140 {I50} which violates RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
E$from 1960Se06; other: 79 {I3} (1961Sc12) 
M,MR$M and |d: from |a(K)exp=95 {I15} (1961Sc12) and |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=1.7 {I1}(1961Se08) 
%IT from I(K|a| x ray,{+113}In)/I(K|a| x ray,{+113}Sn). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$the placement of this transition is questionable. 1987Vi09 in (p,n|g) has found 801|g in coin with 662|g but not with 1018|g and 332|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$direct evidence for the presence of this |g-ray in gated spectra is weak due to poor detection efficiency at low energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$E1 quoted by 2016Ba36 from {+113}Sn Adopted gammas in the ENSDF database is erroneous, as multipolarity is absent for this |g in the ENSDF Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|d=+0.05 {i5} for J=3 or -7.0 {I+27-15} for J=2 
E,RI$from |e decay. E|g=1925.80 {i8} and I|g(1926|g)/I|g(320|g)=20 {i7} in (n,n'|g) suggest that the 1926|g may be a multiplet in that reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$E|g=1249.7 {i3} with Mult.=M1+E2, |d=-1.9 {I+8-31} is reported in (|a,2n|g); however, the much stronger 1072|g is not reported. The 1249.7|g in (|a,2n|g) may thus correspond to a different transition from that seen in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.20 {I2} 
$ A2=+0.187 9, A4=-0.047 13 (1979Br07) 
$ A2=+0.279 10, A4=-0.077 13, ^POL=+0.28 (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.18 {I1} 
$ A2=+0.162 9, A4=-0.039 13, ^POL=+0.20 4 (1979Br07) 
$ A2=+0.287 14, A4=-0.08 2 (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.11 {I1} 
$ A2=-0.09 3, A4=+0.03 5, ^POL=+0.20 3 (1980Va13) 
$ A2=-0.11 6, A4=-0.08 8 (1980Va13) 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.03 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp: for 375.2 and 376.2 
$ A2=+0.12 3, A4=-0.07 5 (1979Br07) 
$POL=-0.22 {I5} for 375.2+376.2 (1979Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.14 {I1} 
$ A2=+0.12 2, A4=-0.01 3, ^POL=+0.18 3 (1980Va13) 
$ A2=+0.24 13, A4=-0.14 16 (1980Va13) 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=-0.29 {I+7-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.12 {I1} 
$A2=-0.089 12, A4=-0.03 3, ^POL=+0.13 3 for doublet (1980Va13,1979Br07) 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=+0.02 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.04 {I1} 
$ A2=+0.072 9, A4=-0.02 2, ^POL=+0.06 4 (1980Va13) 
MR$|d(M3/E2)=+0.11 {I+7-6}. From RUL, |d<0.003 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=0.49 {I3} for the doubly placed 574|g and I|g deduced for placement from the 3479 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g/I|g(2179|g)=0.67 {I17} in (|a,2n|g) one expects I|g=0.15 {I4} for placement from the 3479 level. This leaves I|g=0.20 {I6} for placement elsewhere 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+114}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Jan 2012 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) in (Coul. Ex.) 
MR$others: -2.2 {I+5-8} in (|a,2n|g) 
B(E2)(W.u.)=6.7 {I7}. From B(E2) and E2(s.p.) estimate 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ from 2011An19. See also 2009Wi10, 2007Ca05 and 2005Ca03 for for evidence of decay of 9/2+ parent state to 3/2+ excited state at 497.3 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E 497.370 {I29} (1978He08), 497.4 {I5} (1974Ha39), 497.3 {I5} (1967Mu08) 
RI photons per 100 decays of isomer=0.047 {I1} (1974Ha39). Other: 0.025 {I1} (1978He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1969Ya05, semi. Other: 498.0 {I10} (1966Mc06) 
RI I|g(498|g)/I|g(116|g)|?1.6 (1964Br27) 
MR +0.21 {I2} (1977Da12) Coul. ex. 
|a(K)exp=0.0070 {I4} (1975Ma38) from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1966Mc06. Other: 114.8 (1969Ya05) 
|a(K)exp=0.69 {I7} (1964Iv01) K| x ray/I|g via |g singles, |g|g-coin 
HF(E2,115|g)=7.8 W.u. 
For empirical syst of hindered E2 transitions in odd-mass N=59-67 nuclei: 1978Ho06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E from 1966Mc06, semi 
RI I|g(101|g)/I|g(116|g)=0.28 {I3} (1964Iv01). Other: |?0.3 (1964Br27) 
|a(K)exp=3.8 {I8} (1964Iv01) K| x ray/I|g via |g singles, |g|g-coin 
HF(M2,100.7|g)=8.4 W.u.; analogs: HF(M2,661|g,{+113}Sn)=7.9 W.u., HF(M2,979|g,{+111}Sn)=6.2 W.u. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.21 {I2} from A{-2}=-0.064 {I13}; Analogous transition: |d(159|g,{+117}Sn)=+0.04 {I1} (1977Kr13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$1136.42 (2016Ur03). Note that energy of 1132.42 listed in Fig. 4 of 2016Ur03 is a misprint as per e-mail reply from W. Urban on Sept 29, 2016, which also mentioned that an 1132.47 keV {I15} transition deexcites a 1629.78-keV level, to be discussed in a future paper 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$2372.30 (2016Ur03). Note that 2272.30 listed in authors' Fig.4 is a misprint, as per e-mail reply of Sept 29, 2016 from W. Urban 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$858.95 (2016Ur03). Note that 859.95 listed in authors' Fig.4 is a misprint, as per e-mail reply of Sept 29, 2016 from W. Urban 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g from 1974Ra13. I|g=38.1 {I18} (1970Ra41). This value is inconsistent with intensity balance. 
E$other: 416.99 {I7} (1975Re14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+116}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Dec 2009 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from (819|g)(1294|g)(|q) (2017Cr05). This value can be compared -1.8 {I2} in {+116}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from (931|g)(1294|g)(|q) (2017Cr05). This value can be compared -1.9 {I+5-7} in {+116}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database, however see discussion in 2017Cr05, where the authors suggest that sign(|d) should have been positive based on reported A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients in literature 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
CC$theoretical value from BrIcc code, without including E0 component 
M$possible E0 component deduced by 2017Cr05 from measured |a(K). Ratio |m(K)=I(E0 component of K line)/I(E2 component of K-line) for 138-keV |g ray was deduced as 0.9 {I+65-9}, with |d(138)=0.13. From this ratio, authors deduced X=B(E0)/B(E2)=0.05 {I+34-5} and |r{+2}(E0)=0.0090 {I+16-90} 
MR$from (138|g)(1097|g)(|q) (2017Cr05). Mult=M1 in {+116}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
CC$|a(exp) from {+117}Sn it decay. Theoretical values were reduced by 3% to be consistent with |a(exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
CC$from intensity balance. K:L:M:N=243 {I4}:100:21.5:3.3 {I3} L1:L2:L3=49.8 16:10.7 {I6}:39.5 (1969Ka40) 
RI$from I|g(158|g)/I|g(156|g)=40.88 {I12} reported by 1973Ra14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(158.6|g)/I|g(156.0|g)=43.6 {I15} in 2016Do10. Note, that I|g(156.0|g)=2.41 {I3} would be expected from intensity balance at the 158-keV level (I(|g+ce)(158.6|g)=I(|g+ce)(156.0|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E5]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(314.3|g)/I|g(156.0|g)=0.020 {I5} in Adopted gammas of ENSDF database (2002Bl10) and I|g(156.0|g)=2.29 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI others: 50 {I33} in {+118}Sb |e decay (3.6 min), 54 {I15} in {+118}In |b{+-} decay (5.0 s), 85 {I12} in (|a,2n|g),({+7}Li,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(L)exp=0.36 {I6} 
M from |a(L)exp 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. Others: 18 {I2} (1970Ha08), 16 {I5} (1968Ra14) 
TI required for intensity balance if no direct feeding to 2280 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E not seen in this experiment, probably masked by the strong annhiration radiation. I|g from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E assigned by authors as a transition from the 3- level, but the transition seems a doublet and the component from the 3- level to be weak based on (p,p'|g) spectra from neighboring even tin isotopes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from adopted gammas. 1981Jo03 proposed the 1098.1|g as a deexciting transition of the 3- level, but this transition deexcites the 2+ 2328-keV level based on results of {+118}Sn(n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+118}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Feb 1993 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI$I(299)/I(827)=0.025 {I2} (2024Or2) from indirect measurement gating on the 7269-keV transition 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=12.7 {I11}, X(EO/E2)=6.3 {I5}(2024Or02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E weighted av of 23.875 {I11} in IT decay and 23.867 {I10} in |b{+-} decay (2.4 min) 
M,MR from {+119}Sn IT decay (1968Bo09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI from Coul. ex. 
MR from the compilation of 1977Kr13 based on values from +0.26 {I3} or <-15 in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR from the compilation of 1977Kr13 based on values from -0.31 {I3} or -1.45 {I15} in Coul. ex. 
E from (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted av of 1214.90 {I10} (1973Ra17) and 1214.8 {I3} (1972Ja21) 
RI weighted av of 0.44 {I11} (1973Ra17) and 0.47 {I7} (1972Ja21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$From |a(exp)=5.5 {I7} (1971Be04), |a(exp)=5.12 {I7} (if |a(L1)(theor.)=3.75 {I7}) (1968Bo09), |a(exp)=5.2 {I3} (1964Be16), |a(exp)=5.13 {I15} (from K|a| x ray/I|g(23.8) =1.66 {I3}, 1968Ko12). Notice that all K|a| x ray reported are from internal conversion emission of the 65.7-keV |g-ray transition. 
RI From I(|g+ce)=100 and |a=5.06 {I8}. Other: 15.9 {I3} (1988GeZS) 
MR Deduced by evaluators from L1/L3=45.7 {I15} (1968Bo09) and theoretical conversion coefficients calculated with code bricc. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp=1610 {I82} if |w(K)=0.868 {I28} (1975Ab03), K/L=0.613 {I15} (1971Be04) 
RI From I(|g+ce)=100 and |a=5000 {I70}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
EKC originally value given by authors for a unresolved doublet of 896.6|g+897.5|g, but divided intensities indicate |a(K)exp can be attributed entirely to the 897.5|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
EKC$measured by 2014Ni02 from precisely determined intensities and detector efficiencies. Details of uncertainties given in the paper. This value is compared with theoretical K-conversion coefficient using Dirac-Fock formalism: 1544 {I1} for no-vacancy, 1618 {I1} for vacancy with frozen orbital, and 1603 {I1} with vacancy and self- consistent field (SCF) of ion. The experimental result agrees with theory when there is vacancy in the atomic orbital 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E other: 2422.0 {I8} in |b{+-} decay (3.08 s) 
RI weighted av from (n,n'|g) and |b{+-} decay (46.2 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$from an intensity balance at the 2284 level with assumption of no direct |b{+-} feeding. The 89.87|g is severely attenuated, and the authors do not give an experimental value for it. 
M from {+120}Sb |e decay (5.76 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI I(354.9|g)/I(65.7|g)=8.7 {I10} 
M from intensity ratio of 65.7|g and 354.9|g if both |g's occur in cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$(557|g)(1190|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.87 {I9}, R(46|')=0.95 {I7}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with D-Q cascade of |DJ=1 and |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
M$E1,M1,E2 from |a(exp) 
$(241|g)(1190|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.1 {I1}, R(46|')=1.12 {I8}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with Q(|b{+-})Q cascade of |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from an intensity balance at the 2194.3-keV level, by compiler. |a(exp)=0.268 {I8} was used for the 89.9|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
ECC$measured by 2014Vi05: |a(exp)=0.268 {I8}, |a(K)exp=0.232 {I9}; |a(exp) from intensity balance using 89|g, 1113|g and 1171|g; and |a(K)exp from relative measurement of |g and K x ray transition intensities (2014Vi05). 
$Penetration parameters are |l(1)=3.6 {I16}, |l(2)|?100 (2014Vi05); based on |a(exp), |a(K)exp. Varying |l(2) between the limits of 0 and 200 results in changes to |l(1) on the order of 10-20%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
ECC$measured by 2014Vi05: |a(exp)=0.161 {I7}, |a(K)exp=0.136 {I7}; |a(exp) from intensity balance using 197|g and 1171|g; and |a(K)exp from relative measurement of |g and K x ray transition intensities. 
$Penetration parameters are |l(1)=6 {I2}, |l(2)|?100-200; based on |a(exp), |a(K)exp. Varying |l(2) between the limits of 0 and 200 results in changes to |l(1) on the order of 10-20%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+120}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Dec 2001 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E from energy difference between 919.28|g and 925.57|g 
B(M4)(W.u.) using E|g{+9}|*' (1+|a)=1.345|*10{+18} {i20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from energy difference between 919.28|g and 925.57|g 
M from decay scheme 
TI$The isomeric 6.30 level is fed in 11.3% {I6} of the decays of {+121}In |b{+-} decay (23.1 s). See {+121}Sn IT decay and {+121}Sn |b{+-} decay (43.9 y) for radiation from this isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.009 {I5} allows mult=M1, E2, M2, or E3. The placement in in the decay scheme requires |D|p=no, so mult=M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_comment:
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M from decay scheme 
TI from decay scheme 
E from adopted |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 808.9 {I1} (2007Eg02), 809.1 {I5} (1976Ca24) 
RI calculated with absolute value 3.9 % {I9} (Experimental error {I4}) from 2007Eg02 Other: 18 (1976Ca24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 869.2 {I1} (2007Eg02), 868.8 {I5} (1976Ca24) 
RI calculated with absolute 7.2 % {I18} (Experimental error {I9}) from 2007Eg02; Other: 82 (1976Ca24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 909.1 {I5} (2007Eg02), 908.5 {I5} (1976Ca24) 
RI absolute value 8.1 % {I19} (Experimental error {I8}) (2007Eg02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 925.6 {I1} (2007Eg02), 925.7 {I10} (1976Ca24) 
RI absolute value 17.5 % {I37} (Experimental error {I5}) (2007Eg02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1102.1 {I4} (2007Eg02), 1100.7 {I5} (1976Ca24) 
RI absolute value 6.9 % {I6} (Experimental error {I5}) (2007Eg02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a|?5 from I(75.2|g)/I(281.0|g)|?0.2 measured by 1992Br06 and intensity balance at 2690 level. |a(theory)=0.41 (E1), 1.28 (M1), 4.44 (E2), 68 (E3), 17 (M2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I(1140.0|g)/I(564.1|g in {+122}Te)=0.0107 {I5} (1975SeZC), 0.011 {I1} (1965Ar12), 0.011 {I2} (1967Ar04), 0.012 (1970LaZT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M From angular correlation and linear polarization (azymuthal asymmetry ratio=-0.07 {i3} from fig. 2 in 1999Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$(609|g)(1103|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.8 {I1}, R(46|')=0.96 {I7}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with D-Q cascade of |DJ=1 and |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
M$E1,M1,E2 from |a(exp) 
$(242|g)(1103|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.2 {I1}, R(46|')=1.14 {I8}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with Q(|b{+-})Q cascade of |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$(1030|g)(1103|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.17 {I9}, R(46|')=1.07 {I7}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with Q(|b{+-})Q cascade of |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$|g ray was observed in 2014Is04, but its intensity was obtained by equating its transition intensity with that of 875.3-keV transition 
$2014Is04 give B(E2)(W.u.)=1.4 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+122}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Sep 2006 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (47.4 s) (1976Fo02); also quoted in 2007Eg02 in (n,|g) E=th. Other: 125.9 {I2} from (d,p|g) 
M$from ce data in {+123}In |b{+-} decay (47.4 s) (1976Fo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 618.8 {I3} from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (6.15 s), 619.5 {I5} from (n,|g) E=res, and 619.0 {I3} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 719.0 {I10} from (n,|g) E=res and 719.9 {I8} from (d,p|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g). Other: 16.3 from (n,|g) E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 845.5 {I2} from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (6.15 s), 845.0 {I5} from (n,|g) E=res, and 845.9 {I4} from (d,p|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 769.3 {I5} from (n,|g) E=res, 769.5 {I2} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 770.3 {I9} from (d,p|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g). Other: 33 from (n,|g) E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 896.5 {I5} from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (47.4 s), 895.8 {I10} from (n,|g) E=res, and 895.6 {I8} from (d,p|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 931.2 {I8} from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (6.15 s), 930.9 {I10} from (n,|g) E=res, and 931.3 {I8} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1019.7 {I2} from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (6.15 s) and 1020.0 {I10} from (d,p|g) 
M$M1,E2 from ce data in (d,p|g) and {+123}In |b{+-} decay (6.15 s); E2 consistent with |DJ|p. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1046.8 {I10} from (n,|g) E=res and 1046 {I1} from (d,p|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g). Other: 75 from (n,|g) E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 985.3 {I10} from (n,|g) E=res and 985.6 {I10} from (d,p|g) 
RI$this is the only |g seen from 1136 level in (n,|g) E=res and E=th; no I|g given in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1170 {I1} from {+123}In |b{+-} decay (47.4 s), 1169.8 {I5} from (n,|g) E=res, and 1170.8 {I10} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 823.8 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,X|g) and 823.6 {I3} from ({+12}C,F|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 928.7 {I3} from ({+48}Ca,X|g) and 928.3 {I4} from ({+12}C,F|g) 
RI$weighted average of 83 {I17} from ({+48}Ca,X|g) and 50 {I17} from ({+12}C,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1515.0 {I3} from ({+48}Ca,X|g) and 1515.3 {I5} from ({+12}C,F|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,X|g). Other: 100 {I33} from ({+12}C,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1976Fo02. Other: 126.9 {I5} (1973Ja05) 
RI$other: 45 {I5} per 100 parent decays (1986Go10) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.250 {I30} (1976Fo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From differences of level energies (2016Is03). 
RI$Calculated from summed intensities of 709 and 819 keV |g-rays with electron-conversion coefficient for an E2 transition (2016Is03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by 2016Is03 from B(E2) value for 170 keV isomeric transition in the 27/2- decay study in 1994Ma48 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted av of 47 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 62 {I6} from {+124}In |b{+-} decay (3.11 s) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.042 {I13} in {+124}In |b{+-} decay (3.7 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M from (n,n'|g) and RUL of relevant levels 
E there is an unplaced 2699.6 {I4} |g in |b{+-} decay with I|g=22 {I2}. It may correspond to 2703|g from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI other: 32.0 {I25} in {+124}In |b{+-} decay (3.11 s) 
M from (n,n'|g) and |p's of relevant levels 
MR +0.4 {I2} or +1.9 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Unplaced |g in 1979Fo10 but intensity is consistent with (n,n'|g) data. Placement is by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a|?4 from I(78.2|g)/I(253.45|g)|?0.2 measured by 1992Br06 and intensity balance at 2578 level. |a(theory)=0.36 (E1), 1.15 (M1), 3.86 (E2), 56 (E3), 15 (M2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.115 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.022 {I8}; |g-pol=0.76 {I6} 
MR from 2005Ba02. 1990De50 gives +3.4 {|4} 
Branching ratio =0.983 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.09 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I9} 
E,RI from unplaced |g in 1990De50. Placement is from 2005Ba02. 
Branching ratio =0.22 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI from unplaced |g in 1990De50. Placement is from 2005Ba02. 
M,MR from 2005Ba02 
Branching ratio =0.09 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.038 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I17}; |g-pol=2.0 {I3} 
M other: -0.25 {I8} or +6.4 {I+6-2} (2005Ba02) 
Branching ratio =0.75 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E from 2005Ba02. uncertainty is not given. evaluator assumed the uncertainty is 0.5 keV. 
M from 2005Ba02, |d=-0.02 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.20 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I9} 
MR +0.4 {I2} or +1.9 {I10}; other: > 10 or -0.06 {I16} (2005Ba02) 
Branching ratio =0.20 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.41 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3}; |g-pol=0.7 {I2} 
MR other: +0.60 {I+15-10} or +2.7 {I+10-7} (2005Ba02) 
Branching ratio =0.58 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I6} 
MR other: -0.9 {I5} (2005Ba02) 
Branching ratio =0.05 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.54 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.23 {I7} 
MR other: +2.7 {I7} (2005Ba02) 
Branching ratio =0.161 {i5} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.023 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.038 {I15}; |g-pol=1.0 {I+4-3} 
MR preferred value. Other -0.20 {I6} (1990De50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 2005Ba02. uncertainty is not given. evaluator assumed the uncertainty is 0.5 keV. 
RI from branching ratio to to 1747-keV |g in 2005Ba02. 
Branching ratio =0.059 {i4} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.21 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I17} 
the transition is from 2005Ba02. excitation function and coincidence data supports the placement. 1990De50 reports that the 686.2-keV transition is from the 4269.8-keV level. 
Branching ratio =0.096 {i4} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
MR -0.08 {I+17-28} from 2005Ba02. 
A{-2}=+0.14 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I10} 
Branching ratio =0.094 {i4} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4}; |g-pol=1.4 {I+8-5} 
MR +0.67 {I8} if J|p=2+, +2.6 {I4} if J|p=3+ in 1990De50. 2005Ba02 gives +0.4 {I+9-1} or +1.0 {I+3-7} 
Branching ratio =0.717 {i7} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E from 2005Ba02. uncertainty is not given. evaluator assumed the uncertainty is 0.5 keV. 
RI from branching ratio to to 1747-keV |g in 2005Ba02. 
Branching ratio =0.034 {i3} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E from 2005Ba02. uncertainty is not given. evaluator assumed the uncertainty is 0.5 keV. 
RI from branching ratio to 1826-keV |g in 2005Ba02 and I|g in 1990De50. 
M,MR from 2005Ba02 
Branching ratio =0.24 {i4} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} 
MR -1.0 {I4} or -6 {I+18-14}; -1.0 is 45% probable (1990De50) other: > 20 or -0.9 {I6} 
Branching ratio =0.20 {i1} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} 
MR -0.06 {I10} (M3/E2) (2005Ba02) 
Branching ratio =0.56 {i3} (2005Ba02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3}; |g-pol=0.8 {I3} 
MR other: -0.05, but not established (1990De50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$(996|g)(1047|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.15 {I9}, R(46|')=1.09 {I7}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with Q(|b{+-})Q cascade of |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$(490|g)(1047|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.06 {I9}, R(46|')=1.11 {I7}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with Q(|b{+-})Q cascade of |DJ=2 transitions 
$(490|g)(996|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.2 {I1}, R(46|')=1.05 {I7}, R(75|')=1.00 {I5}; consistent with Q(|b{+-})Q cascade of |DJ=2 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from {+124}Sn Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Apr 2008 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$ Absolute intensity for thermal neutron capture (E=0.028 {I2} eV) is reported to be 43.8 {I+17-18} %. (2007Eg02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated from summed intensities of 661 and 792 keV |g-rays with electron-conversion coefficient for an E2 transition (2016Is03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI 43 {I3} per 100 decays; weighted average of 43.5 {I23} (1993RuZW) and 38 {I5} (1986Go10) 
M from |a(K)exp and K/L 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Evaluator assumed relative intensity uncertainty is about 20%. The intensities are estimated from transition intensity balance of 4.52 |ms isomer by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From systematic of 19/2+ Sn isomers. In {+129}Sn, the ratio of the K-x-ray intensity over L-electron intensity of isomeric transition is 0.7(2), compatible only with an E2 transition(2000Pi03). B(E2)=34 {I4} (2000Pi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Not measured. From the difference of 1930.4 (23/2+) state and 1826.64 (19/2+) state, E{-|g} is deduced. (2008Lo07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from {+128}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Feb 2015 update). This |g is not observed in 2020Ne06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp and K/L in {+129}In |b{+-} decay (1.23 s); |d(E2/M1)>0.7 from |a(K)exp; M1 or E2 from K/L ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+129}In |b{+-} decay (0.67 s) 
RI$weighted average of values in {+129}In |b{+-} decay (0.67 s) and {+129}Sn IT decay:0.27 |ms. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+129}In |b{+-} decay (0.67 s). 
M$half-life is characteristic of an E2 transition (2002Ge07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from K| x ray intensity and L-conversion intensity in {+239}Pu(f,n|g). 
E$from {+129}In |b{+-} decay (0.67 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains B(M1)=0.064 {I+71-22}, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.036 {I+40-12} using upper and lower bounds of the half-life 
$Compiler's note: 2016Li20 mention that |d(E2/M1) of 315|g is unknown, and that they assumed pure M1 character. However, 1980De35 (Phys. Rev. C22, 2163; reference 7 in 2016Li20), from their conversion electron measurements, reported |a(K)(exp)=0.025 {I2} and K/L=6.9 {I17}. Using BrIcc code for E|g=315.42 {I2} (2004Ga24), |a(K)(exp) is consistent with either pure E2, or E2(+M1) with |d(E2/M1)>0.7. For E1+M2 possibility, |d(M2/E1)=0.53 {I3}, which is too large to be realistic. Experimental K/L ratio is of no help in assigning multipolarity or mixing ratio. 
$Using |d(E2/M1)>0.7, compiler obtains B(M1)<0.091 or B(M1)(W.u.)<0.051 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
BM1 from I|g's and calculated B(E2)(2434|g). In order of magnitude this is consistent with {Il}-forbidden M1 transition rates around {+208}Pb (1984Fo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from figure 4 of 2004Fo06; not listed amongst transitions in table II. See 0/35 s 1/2- {+131}In decay dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|DI{-|g}=+2-20. Intensity of the transition represents a normalization from the decay scheme (2004Fo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=98 {I10} 
E from 1979Bo26 (curved crystal spect). Assigned to 0.32 s |b{+-} decay by evaluators based on agreement with 173.28 {I10} (2004Fo06) 
M D from comparison to RUL; |D|p=yes from decay scheme (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=(I|g(Sn K|a)-|w|a(K)(173|g)I|g(173|g))/|wI|g(158|g) using delayed intensities; here |w=|w{-K}(Sn)=0.86, the fluorescent yield (1996Sc06) 
$I|g(delayed)=77 {I4} 
M D,E2,(M3) from comparison to RUL; E2 based on |a(K)exp deduced from Sn K|a observed in delayed spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Corrected for the observed feeding (from 3106|g, 3578|g and 3713|g). The sum of the normalized intensity of the transitions fed the 332 keV state is 39 {I8}. The measured I(332|g)=50 {I1} and the fraction of the measured intensity into the state is 80% in 2022Jo01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$corrected for contamination from {+131}Sb decay. Energy measured in coincidence because of doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Relative Intensity=0.049 {I19} 
E,RI$corrected for contamination from {+131}Sb decay. Energy measured in coincidence because of doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition not observed in the present experiment, but its branching ratio from literature included in the analysis. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$64.4 keV in {+132}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 
RI$1.0 from |g-branching ratios in {+132}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
TI$deduced by compiler from intensity balance at 4848 level 
RI$deduced by compiler from I|g+ce and |a for (E2) 
M$from {+132}Sn Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Feb 2018 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The absolute intensity of the transition is about 0.5% per decay of {+133}In (1996Ho16, 2000Ho32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$2f{-5/2} to 2f{-7/2} spin-flip transition 
$B(M1)=0.55 {I+|@-14} (2014Al07. Compilers' note: based on RUL=3 for B(M1)(W.u.), B(M1) should not exceed 5.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.27 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.08 {i4} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.22 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.05 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.15 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.29 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), both for 338.9|g and 339.1|g, Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.26 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.02 {i9} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.29 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.06 {i4} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.29 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.04 {i4} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.31 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.16 {i9} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.07 {i7} (1994Is01), both for 318.4|g and 320.1|g, Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.35 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.21 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.03 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.27 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.02 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 179.5|g and 179.9|g, mixed Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.06 {i7} (1994Is01), both for 359.1- and 360.5 |g, Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.42 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.04 {i9} (1994Is01), mixed Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.07 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 241.5|g and 243.3|g, Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.14 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.14 {i9} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.07 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 318.4- and 320.1 |g, Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=0.35 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.18 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.06 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 359.1|g and 360.5|g, Magnetic Multipole (from Polarization anisotropy 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.27 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.08 {i4} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (Fig.2 in 1994Is01, polarization anisotropy) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.22 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.05 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.15 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.29 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 338.9|g and 339.1|g, Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.26 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.02 {i9} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$not given by 1996Sc29, seen and placed in 1994Is01 and 1994Ja06 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.11 {i8}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.01 {i12} (1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$seen and placed only in 1994Is01 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.12 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.07 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 416.7|g and 416.9 |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.29 {i2}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.06 {i4} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.29 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i4} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not given by 1996Sc29, seen and placed by 1994Is01. 1998LaZU placed a 1029|g from a level at E=4960, J|p=(25/2-) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.31 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.16 {i9} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.07 {i7} (1994Is01), both for 318.4|g and 320.1|g; Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.35 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.21 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.03 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not given by 1996Sc29, seen and placed in 1994Is01. 1998LaZU placed a 384|g from a level at E=5190, J|p=(27/2-) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.27 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.02 {i7} (1994Is01) for both 179.5|g and 179.9|g, mixed Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.06 {i7} (1994Is01) both for 359.1|g and 360.5|g Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.42 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i9} (1994Is01), mixed Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.07 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), both for 241.5|g and 243.3|g; Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.07 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.04 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 241.5|g and 243.3 |g; Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.14 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.14 {i9} (1994Is01), Magnetic Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.35 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.18 {i7} (1994Is01), Electric Multipole (from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.06 {i7} (1994Is01), for both 359.1|g and 360.5|g; Magnetic Multipole(from polarization anisotropy, Fig.2 in 1994Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$Assigned M1+E2 in 1997La13, where the authors stated that the measured DCO ratio was consistent with that for a stretch dipole transition with a small multiple mixing ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$Authors stated that DCO ratio was consistent with a stretched dipole with small multiple mixing ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$1268|g peak present in 851 |g-gated spectra at only about half the expected intensity, based on intensities of 1176 and 1506 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$ 1268|g peak present in 851 |g-gated spectra at only about half the expected intensity, based on intensities of 1176 and 1506 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.264 {I86} (1997Fa08); A{-4}=-0.042 {I73} (1997Fa08); A{-2}=-0.30 {I3} and DCO=0.61 {I6} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.102 {I30} (1997Fa08); A{-2}=-0.254 {I95} and A{-4}=-0.044 {I81} (1997Fa08); A{-2}=-0.29 {I4} and DCO=0.98 {I9} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I3}, DCO=0.55 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); |a(K)exp=0.067 {I18} (1997Fa08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I9} and A{-2}=-0.229 {I371}, A{-4}=-0.058 {I311} (1997Fa08); DCO=0.76 {I4} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.014 {I2} and A{-2}=-0.508 {I218}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I169} (1997Fa08); DCO=0.70 {I9} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.28 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.75 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); K/L=5.6 {I13} in 1976Ka19 
MR$2.5 {I20} from K/L=5.6 {I13} in 1976Ka19. However, the deduced E3 transition strength of B(E3)(W.u.)=620 {I140} exceeds RUL=100 by more than 3 sigma 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I2} (1997Fa08); A{-2}=-0.17 {I3} and DCO=0.77 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g)(1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from DCO=0.44 {I6} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14). Other: Mult.=(E2) in {+89}Y({+29}Si,|a2n|g) (1997Mo01), but no arguments were given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.58 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.39 {I9} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.10 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.98 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.42 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.39 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.7 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=2.05 {I12} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.45 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.55 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.03 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.40 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.01 {I2} for 1058.5+1060.0 in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.86 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.37 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.34 {I10} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.92 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.25 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.49 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.19 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.37 {I9} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=2.2 {I4} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.47 {I10} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.25 {I13} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.91 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.41 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.97 {I4} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.13 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.95 {I14} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I9} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.0 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I3} for 1058.5+1060.0|g in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.01 {I2} for 1058.5+1060.0|g in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.4 {I1} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.85 {I18} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.36 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.01 {I16} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.98 {I7} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14), 0.97 {I5} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.41 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.98 {I16} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14), 1.21 {I11} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.67 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.30 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.61 {I6} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 
 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.18 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=1.47 {I5} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.29 {I4} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.98 {I9} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.55 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.28 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.75 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I3} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14); DCO=0.77 {I2} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g)(1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(932)/I|g(841.3)=0.96 {I6} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 
M$DCO=0.98 {I16} in {+103}Rh({+12}C,3n|g) (1998La14), 1.21 {I11} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.67 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(1003)/I|g(841.3)=0.89 {I8} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 
M$DCO=0.98 {I7} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.52 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(1059)/I|g(841.3)=0.87 {I9} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); 
M$DCO=0.99 {I5} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol(1059+1059+1060)=+0.46 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(1117)/I|g(841.3)=0.81 {I4} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 
M$DCO=1.27 {I20} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.76 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(1183)/I|g(841.3)=0.58 {I4} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 
M$DCO=1.2 {I3} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.6 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(1299)/I|g(841.3)=0.49 {I3} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 
M$DCO=1.06 {I22} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14); Pol=+0.3 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(1494)/I|g(841.3)=0.32 {I2} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 
$DCO=0.83 {I27} in {+90}Zr({+31}P,2|an|g) (1998La14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI calc from I(|g+ce)(723|g)=I(|g+ce)(576|g) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I6} (1977Br08), 0.0034 {I2} (1974Ch51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E from 1977Br08. Others: 576.8 {I4} (1975WiZX), 576.6 (1978Su05), 576.3 {I3} (1979Sh03) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.019 {I4} (1977Br08) 
Reduced matrix element and coupling constant are determined for h11/2 to g7/2 M2 transition (1978Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from 1977Br08. Others: 1300.3 {I2} (1975WiZX), 1300.0 (1978Su05), 1300.2 {I10} (1979Sh03) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I3} (1977Br08) 
Reduced matrix element and coupling constant are determined for h11/2 to d5/2 E3 transition (1978Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$calc from I(|g+ce)(723|g)=I(|g+ce)(576|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I6} (1977Br08), 0.0034 {I2} (1974Ch51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1071.64 {I15} (1974Ch51) 
RI from I|g(1072|g)=5.1 {I4} ({+115}Te isomer + g.s. decays) - I|g(g.s.)=0.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E from 1974Ch51. Others: 723.53 {I9} (1977Br08), 723.6 {I1} (1975WiZX) 
MR pure M1 from |a(K)exp=0.00342 {I20} (1974Ch51), -2<|d<-0.2 from A{-2}=-0.382 {I17} (1977Br08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR pure M1 from |a(K)exp=0.0057 {I6} (1974Ch51), +0.12 {I4} (1977Br08) A{-2}=-0.04 {I3}, -0.05 {I8} (1979Sh03) A{-2}=-0.22 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 207.37 {I6} (1973FrYL), 207.5 (1975HeZF) 
MR -0.21 {I6} (1977Br08). Other: -0.08 {I6} (1979Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 441.82 {I10} (1973FrYL), 442.0 (1975HeZF) 
MR -0.28 {I6} (1979Sh03), -2<|d<-0.4 (1977Br08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L:M=100 {I3}:34.8 {I17}:8.9 {I10} (1961Fi05) 
K/L$K:L:M=100 {I2}:35.6 {I7}:8.45 {I15} (1968Ra23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp deduced by 1981Mo10 from |g intensities and 1968Ra23 conversion electron measurements, if |a(K)(93.7)=1.52. From ce data of 1961Fi05, 1981Mo10 deduce |a(K)=0.47 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not observed in Te |e decay. E|g is from E(level) difference. I|g is based on I|g/I|g(363|g)=0.12 {I2} in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) and linear polarization in ({+7}Li,4n|g) (1982Du11) and |a(K)exp 1991Ga16 in (|a,n|g). 1982Va07 assign M1,E2 for 776|g, based on |a(K)exp=0.00022 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
TI$from intensity balance 
M$1987Io01 assigned E2 because if it was E1(|a=4.4) or M1(|a=16.6) it would have been seen. M2 is excluded from T{-1/2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp suggests pure E2, but such E2 enhancement between non-collective levels does not seem realistic 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI other: 6.1 {I2} in {+115}In(|a,n),118(p,n),(d,2n): delayed decay 
M probably stretched E1 from |g(|q) in {+115}In(|a,n),118(p,n),(d,2n): delayed decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I8}. |a(K)=0.0091 {I5} 
MR +0.25 for |g(1+ to 2+), -0.40 {I18} for g(2+ to 2+) 
|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from authors' drawing; 575.80 in the authors' table appears to be a misprint 
|a(K)exp=0.0055 {I10}. |a(K)=0.0050 {I5} 
MR -0.34 {I21} if 2+ to 2+, 0.17 {I10} if 3+ to 2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00333 {I20}. |a(K)=0.0032 {I4} 
MR -0.08 {I17} if 2+ to 3+, -0.65 {I16} if 3+ to 3+, and 0.10 if 4+ to 3+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00271 {I20}. |a(K)=0.0032 {I3} 
MR from |a(K)exp. Others: 0.22 {I18} if 2+ to 3+, -0.14 {I17} if 3+ to 3+ from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I6}. |a(K)=0.0052 {I5} 
MR 0.08 {I8} for |g(2- to 3-), -0.62 {I16} for |g(3- to 3-) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E doublet. A part of the intensity is considered as that of a transition depopulating the 1186 level from results of (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M mult=stretched Q from A{-2} and A{-4} values, but this is inconsistent with J|p assignments for the 1187- or 964 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M RUL rules out pure E2, but intensity imbalance in a cascade 31.2|g-238.5|g suggests a dipole transition with higher multipole admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E expected in authors' drawing. Rounded-off value is from energy difference between relevant levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q), and the ratio I(115.4|g)/I(103.6|g)=0.84 {I4} and its theoretical value: I(115.4|g, E1)/I(103.6|g M1)=0.83 supports mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp and subshell ratio in {+119}Te |e decay (4.70 d and 16.0 h) 
MR from the compilation by 1980Kr22. Other: -0.04 {I4} (1979Sh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
K:L1:L2:L3:M+=100.0 {I17}:11.3 {I3}:0.61 {I10}:0.19 {I3}:2.97 {I15} (1977Ya03); K/L1=8.9 {I+8-7}, L1/L2=12 {I+5-3} (1982Sa22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_comment:
K:L:M=100 {I2}:14.6 {I9}:3.0 {I6} 
MR +0.12 {I8} from weighted av of 0.13 {I11} from |g|g(|q) and 0.10 {I+11-10} from |a(K)exp (1977Ya03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
K/L=17 {I+9-5} 
E doublet. The possibility of a single transition with mult=E1+M2 is excluded from inconsistency between the |a(K)exp and |g|g(|q) results 
RI divided from I|g=3.78 {I8} based on the |a(K)exp and the assumed mult of E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M$|a(288|g)=0.16 {I3} from |g-ray transition intensity balance suggests M2 or E3 multipolarities. If the 288-keV |g ray de-excites the isomeric level at 2841.8 keV (T{-1/2}=0.85 s {I9}), then an E3 multipolarity would be consistent with that for a retarded transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of -0.06 {I4} (2009Wa02) and +0.02 {I3} from {+121}Sb IT decay (179 |ms) 
$|a(exp)=0.02 {I5} from {+121}Sb IT decay (179 |ms): |a(K)exp=0.013 {I2} (2009Wa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=9.32 {I37} (1968Sn01), 9.45 {I33} (1978Hu07), 9.52 {I27} (1984Ha09), 8.7 {I2} (2002Zh51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
$I|g=98 {I9} 
RI$3.9 {I5} relative to 100 for 909.8|g 
$(292|g)(715|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.097 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=100 
RI$13.3 {I14} relative to 100 for 909.8|g 
MR$weighted average of +0.03 {I14}, -0.04 {I6} and +0.05 {I4} from |g|g(|q) in 2008Jo03. 
$|d=+0.03 {I14} from (287|g)(1145|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} 
$|d=-0.04 {I6} from (287|g)(715|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.048 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} 
$|d=+0.05 {I4} from (287|g)(292|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.099 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} 
$|a(exp)=0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from (292|g)(715|g assumed E2)(|q): A{-2}=+0.091 {I27}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4}: |a(K)exp=0.034 {I2} (2009Wa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from (287|g)(292|g assumed E2)(|q)+(287|g)(715|g assumed E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.108 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4}: |a(K)exp=0.013 {I2} (2009Wa02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.88 {I10} (1962De20), 0.65 {I3} (1963Ci02), 0.64 {I2} ; (1988i08) |a(exp)=0.71 {I2} (1976ReZI), 0.75 {I3} (1988Vi08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ |a(K)exp=3.1 {I5} (1962De20), 2.88 {I16} (1963Ci02), 3.02 {I13} (1988Vi08), |a(exp)=4.72 {i9} (1988Vi08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ |a(K)exp=0.64 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.065 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.0127 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.0218 {i18}, |a(M1)exp=0.0111 {i10}, |a(M2)exp+|a(M3)exp=0.0049 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.00 {I5}, |a(L1)exp=0.122 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0082 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0028 {I8}, |a(M1)exp=0.0252 {I13}, |a(N)exp=0.0066 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=2.22 {I13}, |a(L1)exp=0.26 {I2}, |a(L2)exp=0.39 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.52 {I3}, |a(N)exp=0.033 {I7} other |a(exp) data: |a(K)exp=3.1 {I5} (1962De20), 2.88 {I16} (1963Ci02) indicate M1+E2, but level scheme is consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E|g and I(|g+ce) are deduced from the level scheme; E|g=26 {I1} keV and possible E3 multipolarity were reported from approximate measurement of L- and M-conversion electrons by 1963De05 (see {+122}Sb IT decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E|g from ce(L1), I|g from Ice and |a(M1 theory) 
ce(L1)/ce(M1)=0.098 {I9}/0.025 {I6} 
M observation of ce(L1) and ce(M1) only, suggest mult=M1 or E1. From the level scheme |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp=0.51 {I14} 
E|g from ce(L1); I(|g+ce) is deduced from intensity balance; I|g is from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min). Others: 160.3 {I5} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 160.9 {I10} from (n,n'|g), 159.8 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
M$from ce data in {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min) and (p,2n|g), |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. 
MR$deduced from T{-1/2}=0.61 ns {I4} and B(E2)|^=0.0034 {I6} from Coulomb excitation. Others: -0.10 {I6} (1964Al28) and +0.86 {I7} (1977Ku23) from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation; 0.22 {I+18-22} from |a(K)exp=0.15 {I2} in (p,2n|g), |a(K)exp=0.15 {I1} and K/L=7.6 {I6} in {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min), using the BrIccMixing program. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 381.75 {I5} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min), 381.79 {I15} from (n,n'|g), and 381.6 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 100 {I6} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min), 100 {I7} from (n,n'|g). 
M$mainly M1 from ce data in (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 541.95 {I10} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min), 542.1 {I2} from (n,n'|g), and 541.9 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$unweighted average of 45 {I6} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min), 47 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 31.6 {I13} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 552.37 {I24} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min) and 552.1 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (40.06 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1030.23 {I10} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d), 1030.3 {I4} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 1030.5 {I3} from (|g,|g'), 1030.3 {I3} from (n,n'|g), 1030.1 {I3} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 1030.4 {I2} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 1030.5 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation and (n,n'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$deduced from B(E2)=0.073 {I4} in Coulomb excitation, adopted T{-1/2}=0.190 ps {I+16-14}, with sign from |d=-1.6 {I15} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) (1979Ho28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1088.64 {I10} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d), 1088.6 {I3} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 1088.6 {I3} from {+123}Sb IT decay (61 |ms), 1088.8 {I5} from (|g,|g'), 1088.7 {I4} from (n,n'|g), 1088.6 {I3} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 1088.6 {I2} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 1089.0 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in {+123}Sb IT decay (61 |ms) (2009Wa02, 2008Jo03); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: Q,D from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1021.00 {I20} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d), 1021.2 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 1021.8 {I3} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1977Ku23), with |d=+0.39 {I4} for J=5/2 and -0.039 {I4} for J=7/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1100.5 {I4} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d), 1100.9 {I5} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 1101.0 {I3} from (n,n'|g), and 1100.2 {I3} from ({+31}P,X|g). Other: 1101.0 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI$from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns). Others: 100 {I50} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d) and 100 {I27} from ({+31}P,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1260.9 {I4} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d), 1260.9 {I7} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 1261.0 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 1260.5 {I4} from ({+31}P,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 64 {I36} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d), 39 {I11} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), and 47 {I13} from ({+31}P,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1177.06 {I20} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d) and 1176.8 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d). Other: <45 from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1337.44 {I20} from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d) and 1337.6 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+123}Sn |b{+-} decay (129.2 d). Other: 100 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 396.0 {I5} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 395.2 {I2} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 395.4 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI$weighted average of 30.9 {I32} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 34.9 {I79} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 35 {I19} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 567.7 {I4} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 567.3 {I3} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 568.2 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI$weighted average of 14.9 {I32} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns) and 19.0 {I48} from ({+31}P,X|g). Other: 28 {I14} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 626.1 {I4} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 625.7 {I3} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 626.0 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI$from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns). Other: 100 {I19} from ({+31}P,X|g), 100 {I45} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in {+123}Sb IT decay; E1 required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 381.7 {I4} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 381.0 {I2} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 382.0 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (2009Wa02) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (2009Wa02) and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 955.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb IT decay (61 |ms), 955.4 {I3} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 955.6 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in {+123}Sb IT decay (61 |ms); M2 ruled out by RUL, since it would require an isomeric halflife 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 201.0 {I4} from {+123}Sb IT decay (214 ns), 200.4 {I2} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 200.4 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 441.9 {I3} from {+123}Sb IT decay (61 |ms) and 441.7 {I4} from ({+31}P,X|g), and 441.6 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI,M$from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g), with Mult from |g|g(|q) and RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 127.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb IT decay (61 |ms) (2008Jo03), 127.0 {I5} from ({+31}P,X|g) (2005Po03), and 128.2 {I10} from {+9}Be({+238}U,F|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (2009Wa02) 
M$O+Q from |g|g(|q) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g); M3 ruled out and E2 preferred by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 40.06-min isomer decay in 1974Ra03. Other: a very weak peak of 155 {I10} seen in coincidence with 1030|g in 1966Au04, with about 4% of the intensity of 1030|g, making a level at 1187; but this placement and the 1187 level were not confirmed in other studies and instead, the 155|g could correspond to 160|g here. 
TI$from intensity balance at 160 level 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M,MR$from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 160.35 {I3} (2006Kr04), 160.0 {I3} (1977Ti03), 160.33 {I5} (1974Ra03), 159.7 {I5} (1968Ba04), and 160.6 {I6} (1968Je02). Other: 153 {I5} from E(ce) (1949Du15) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.15 {I1} and K/L=7.6 {I6} (1977Ti03) gives |d(E2/M1)=0.21 {I+14-21}, using BrIccMixing. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 381.77 {I5} (2006Kr04), 381.1 {I4} (1977Ti03), 381.7 {I4} (1974Ra03), 381.3 {I7} (1968Je02), and 381 {I1} (1968Ba04). 
RI$weighted average of 0.050 {I3} (2006Kr04), 0.049 {I5} (1977Ti03), 0.05 {I1} (1974Ra03), and 0.040 {I4} (1968Ba04). Other: 0.027 {I3}) (1968Je02) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 541.95 {I10} (2006Kr04), 541.4 {I4} (1977Ti03), 542.2 {I4} (1974Ra03), 542.2 {I9} (1968Je02), and 542 {I1} (1968Ba04) 
RI$weighted average of 0.028 {I5} (2006Kr04), 0.021 {I3} (1977Ti03), 0.030 {I6} (1974Ra03), 0.016 {I3} (1968Je02), and 0.020 {I4} (1968Ba04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 171.22 {I38} (2006Kr04) and 170.9 {I7} (1977Ti03) 
RI$weighted average of 0.003 {I3} (2006Kr04) and 0.008 {I5} (1977Ti03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 552.29 {I24} (2006Kr04), 552.8 {I4} (1977Ti03), 552.2 {I4} (1974Ra03), and 552 {I1} (1968Ba04) 
RI$weighted average of 0.010 {I3} (2006Kr04), 0.010 {I3} (1977Ti03), 0.014 {I3} (1974Ra03), and 0.007 {I2} (1968Ba04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 381.7 (2007Ju06) 
M$(382|g)(626|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.045 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I10} gives |d(O/Q)=-0.07 {I2} in 2009Wa02; but M2 and M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 127.6 (2007Ju06) 
M$|d(O/Q)=+0.01 {I6} from (127|g)(442|g)(|q)+(127|g)(956|g)(|q)+(127|g)(1089|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.106 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I36} (2009Wa02); M3 ruled out by RUL; E2 preferred since M2 would require a large B(M2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 542.1 {I2} (1979Ho28), 542.5 {I10} (1971Ba47) 
RI$others: I(542.1|g)/I(381.8|g)=40/60 (1979Ho28), 42/58 (1971Ba47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1030.1 {I3} (1978AhZX), 1030.5 {I3} (1979Ho28), and 1030.4 {I10} (1971Ba47) 
MR$from -3.1 to -0.16 for J=9/2 (1979Ho28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1088.8 {I4} (1979Ho28) and 1088.4 {I10} (1971Ba47). Other: 1088.64 used for calibration in 1978AhZX 
MR$0.32 to 6.3 if J=9/2 (1979Ho28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1101.1 {I3} (1978AhZX), 1100.2 {I6} (1979Ho28), 1102.0 {I10} (1971Ba47) 
RI$from I|g=16.4 {I22} including |g ray from {+121}Sb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1176.5 {I5} (1979Ho28) and 1178.0 {I10} (1971Ba47). Other: 1179.0 (composite peak, 1978AhZX) 
RI$from 3.3 {I8} for a composite peak in 1978AhZX. Others: I(1176.8|g)/I(1337.5|g)=21/79 (1979Ho28), 27/72 (1971Ba47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1337.5 {I3} (1978AhZX), 1337.8 {I5} (1979Ho28), and 1338.0 {I20} (1971Ba47) 
MR$>28 or <0.18 if J=9/2 (1979Ho28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1971Ba47. Others: 1352.4 (composite peak, 1978AhZX); in Fig 1 of 1979Ho28 a composite peak is seen around this energy but not reported by the authors 
RI$from 4.2 {I8} for a composite peak (1978AhZX). Other: I(1350.0|g)/I(1509.6|g)=34/66 (1971Ba47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1510.6 {I20} (1971Ba47); a composite peak of 1509+1515+1519 is shown in Fig 1 of 1979Ho28, but 1509|g is assigned to {+121}Sb by the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$energy and placement from 1979Ho28, intensity from 1978AhZX for the 1425.8 {I8} assigned to {+121}Sb by 1978AhZX 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1966Ba45 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1964Al28; M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: |d(Q/D)=+0.86 {I7} from |g(|q) in 1977Ku23 
$A{-2}=-0.153 {I8} (1977Ku23); re-calculated by the evaluator: -0.154 {I+166-176} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from Adopted Gammas. 
MR$deduced (by the evaluator) from B(E2)|^=0.073 {I4} and adopted T{-1/2}(1030)=190 fs {I+16-14}. Other: from their |g(|q) data, 1977Ku23 report |d=|@, which is considered questionable by the evaluator. 
$A{-2}=+0.170 {I11} (1977Ku23); re-calculated: +0.171 {I+49-51} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) in 1989Ja13 and RUL. A{-2}=+0.175 {I21} from 1989Ja13 giving |DJ=2 is significantly different from +0.015 {I2} from 1977Ku23 (re-calculated=+0.015 {I14}), from which 1977Ku23 report |d(Q/D)=+0.82 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1977Ku23, not reported in 1975An16 
M,MR$1977Ku23 report +0.39 {I4} for J=5/2 and -0.039 {I4} for J=7/2 from |g(|q) 
$A{-2}=-0.101 {I15} (1977Ku23); re-calculated: -0.101 {I+59-62} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$from 1977Ku23, with Mult from |g(|q). 1977Ku23 report |d(Q/D)=-0.47 {I5} for J=5/2 
$A{-2}=+0.023 {I3} (1977Ku23); re-calculated: +0.023 {I+65-69} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$from 1977Ku23, with Mult from |g(|q). 1977Ku23 report |d(Q/D)=-0.17 {I2} for J=5/2 
$A{-2}=+0.120 {I18} (1977Ku23); re-calculated: +0.120 {I+67-72} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1088.5 (2009Wa02) 
RI$estimated by the evaluator from intensity balance 
M$Q from |g|g(|q) in 2009Wa02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 625.7 (2009Wa02) 
M$D from |g|g(|q) in 2009Wa02 
M$E2 in 2009Wa02 could be a misprint and it should be E1 instead from their proposed level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 381.6 (2009Wa02), 381.7 (2007Ju06) 
M$(382|g)(626|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.045 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I10} gives |d(O/Q)=-0.07 {I2} in 2009Wa02; but M2 and M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$D from |g|g(|q) in 2009Wa02 
M$E2 in 2009Wa02 could be a misprint and it should be E1 instead from their proposed level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 381.7 (2007Ju06) 
M,MR$(382|g)(626|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.045 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I10} gives |d(O/Q)=-0.07 {I2} in 2009Wa02; but M2 and M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 955.6 (2009Wa02) 
M$|d(O/Q)=-0.10 {I+17-25} from (956|g)(1089|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} (2008Jo03); Q from |g|g(|q) in 2009Wa02; M2 and M3 ruled out by RUL, since they would require an isomeric halflife. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from figure 1 of 2009Wa02, 100.5 in table II 
RI$I(100.4|g)/I(441.9|g)=1.4 {I1}/97 {I3} (2009Wa02) 
M$from |a(exp)=0.1 {I2} in 2009Wa02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 441.7 (2009Wa02), 441.9 (2007Ju06) 
M$|d(O/Q)=-0.08 {I+14-18} from (442|g)(1089|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} in 2008Jo03; Q from |g|g(|q) in 2009Wa02; M2, M3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 127.4 (2009Wa02), 127.6 (2007Ju06) 
M$O+Q from |g|g(|q) and |a(exp)=0.76 {I13} (weighted average of 0.85 {I15}, 0.75 {I14} and 0.69 {I13} from different |g gates) in 2008Jo03; and also from |g|g(|q) in 2009Wa02 
$|d(O/Q)=-0.06 {I+18-21} from (128|g)(1089|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} in 2008Jo03; |d=+0.01 {I6} from (127|g)(442|g)(|q)+(127|g)(956|g)(|q)+(127|g)(1089|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.106 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I36} in 2009Wa02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.15 {I2} (from comparison of x- and |g-ray intensities) (1969PrZY), with |d obtained using BrIccMixing by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp=0.152 {I23}, |a(L2)exp=0.044 {I11}, |a(L3)exp=0.054 {I8}, |a(M1)exp=0.043 {I8}, |a(M2)exp+|a(M3)exp=0.023 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.76 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.097 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0067 {I11}, |a(L3)exp<0.0035 |a(M1)exp=0.018 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.73 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.20 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.26 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.28 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.055 {I11}, |a(M2)exp+|a(M3)exp=0.110 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ Weighted average of {+238}U({+12}C,X|g) and {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 
M$ From {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$ Weighted average of {+238}U({+12}C,X|g) and {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 
RI$ From {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 
M$ From {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$ Weighted average of {+238}U({+12}C,X|g) and {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 
RI$ From {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 
M$ M1 or E2 from {+124}Sn({+7}Li,|a2n|g). Placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from (823|g)(pol 1067|g)(|q), (pol 915|g)(1067|g)(|q) (1974Ga03) 
MR From 1977Kr13. Other: 1.56 {I22} from (822|g)(1067|g)(|q) (1980Ve04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M From (470|g)(1419|g)(|q) (1971Ma01,1980Ve04) 
MR From 1977Kr13. Other: 4.4 {I8} from (470|g)(1419|g)(|q) (1980Ve04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR From (pol 470|g)(1087|g)(|q) (1974Ga03) 
MR Other: 0.045 {I+22-45} from (470|g)(1087|g)(|q) (1980Ve04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler gets an uncertainty of 0.00009 in B(E2) value. It appears that 2019Bi04 did not consider uncertainty of 1 keV in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$compiler's note: the uncertainty=0.2 (0.2%) is unrealistically small and it is probably a typo and could be 2% instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E From electron measurement. 
RI$calculated value from assumptions that %IT=18.6 {I6}, |a=3.2|*10{+5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition not seen as it is below the energy threshold. Postulated from similar transitions in {+123},{+125}Sb between 19/2- and 15/2- states 
E$from level-energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler gets an uncertainty of 0.00015 for B(E2). It appears that 2019Bi04 did not consider uncertainty of 1 keV in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains uncertainty of 0.00011 for B(E2). It appears that 2019Bi04 did not consider uncertainty of 1 keV in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$quoted as 7.42 {I2} in table III-14, but 7.2 in author's figure III-30. Value taken from figure 
$EG=1510.0 3, IG=1.0 4 (1982Hu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_comment:
RI$|?6.8 deduced by evaluators from total I(|g+ce) feeding this level and 15% IT decay. 1987StZO (also 1987St23) list 18.9 {i10}, probably from observation in a spectrum run for a certain counting schedule. The decay of 17.7-min isomer does not reach equilibrium. 
$EG=722.6 1, IG=11 3 (1982Hu09) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.049 {I9} (1987St23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
TI$from intensity balance at 1861 level, 5% uncertainty assigned by evaluators. 1987St23 list 25.8 and 1987StZO list 18.6 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce)=8.4 in 1987St23 and |a. 1987StZO list I(|g+ce)=0.64 {I6} and I|g=0.22 {I2}, which seems erroneous 
$EG=67.6 2, IG=10 3 (1982Hu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce)=21.4 {I5} in 1987St23, 1987StZO and |a. 1987StZO list I|g=0.706 {I5}, which seems in erroneous 
$EG=77.3 1, IG=15 9 (1982Hu09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce)=0.6 {I3} in 1987StZO and |a. 1987StZO list I|g=0.07 {I1}, which seems erroneous in view of |g spectrum shown in author's figure iii-31 and intensity of 79.4|g therein 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) listed in 1987St23 (and 1987StZO) and |a for E2. I|g=1.93 {I10} listed in 1987StZO gives |d(E2/M1)=0.37 {I5}, |a(exp)=9.7 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$M1 suggested by 1987StZO, but I(|g+ce)=1.14 {I6} and I|g=0.092 {I5} (1987StZO) give |d(E2/M1)=0.22 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E,M$from {+129}Sb Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (May 2014 update). There is no indication this transition was observed by 2019Bi04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains uncertainty of 0.00017 for B(E2). It appears that 2019Bi04 did not consider uncertainty of 1 keV in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 84.208 {I1} (1979Bo26). This value deviates significantly from 84.7 {I1} (1974Ke08) and 84.67 (1987StZO), thus it is not used. 
M$|a(K)exp=1.19 {I25} gives M1+E2 with |d=0.7 {I3}; K/L=2.3 gives E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2002Ge07: Phys. Rev. C65, 034322 
CC$assuming 1 keV uncertainty in E|g value 
$Compiler obtains uncertainty of 0.0017 in B(E2) with the assumption of 1 keV uncertainty in E|g value. It appears that 2019Bi04 did not consider uncertainty in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$|g, ce not observed; transition was introduced (2000Ge18) on the basis of |g1226.4 time measurements 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Compiler obtains uncertainty of 0.0016 in B(E2). It appears that 2019Bi04 did not consider uncertainty of 1 keV in E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+241}Pu(n,F|g), observed in coincidence with the K-61.5 keV conversion electron line (2000Ge08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)=2.13 {I5} 
M$from |a(exp)=2.3 {I+17-8} from intensity balance considerations in 1978Si05 and K(61.7|g)/K(162.3|g)=5.0 {I3} gives M1 multipolarity (2000Ge08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)<0.4 from intensity balance considerations in 1978Si05, consistent with E1, M1 or E2 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed in coincide with K-61.5 keV conversion electron line (2000Ge08). 
RI$from I|g(1510|g)/I|g(152|g)=20 {I10} (2000Ge08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$No short time component is observed in 1510.5|g(t) that contradicts the findings in {+235}U(n,F|g) (1978Si05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Alternatively |G947 could be placed depopulating a 1278 keV level in {+134}Sb. Placement from 1331 level suggested by 2005Sh23 is based upon observation of |g1000 and |g-energy sums. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ 947 transition could be alternatively placed as depopulating a 1278 keV level in {+134}Sb. Placement from 1331 level suggested by 2005Sh23 based upon observation of 1000 transition and |g energy sums. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$no broadening of the 53|g peak is observed by 2015Lo08, suggesting non-existence of a previously proposed 51.4 {I3} transition by 2007Si27. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$I(K|a x-ray)/I(ce(L)+ce(M))=1.7 {I4} for the 53.4|g and 51.4|g doublet is consistent only with the two transitions having different multipolarities; theoretical ratios are 1.4 {I1} for E2-E1 and 1.6 {I1} for E2-M1. The intensity ratio I|g(173|g)/I|g(53.4|g)=10.5 {I23} is consistent with M1 multipolarity for the 53.4|g; theoretical ratios are 9.1 {I6} for M1 and 7.2 {I5} for E1, taking E2 multipolarity for the 173|g. Having fixed M1 for the multipolarity of the 53.4|g, the 51.4|g is then E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|DE estimated by evaluator from Fig. 1 of 2007Si27. 
$|a(K)exp=0.17 {I4} (2007Si27). 
M$From |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$pure E2 is ruled out by 2016Lo01 since with a total conversion coefficient of 5.61, its I|g would be about five times smaller than that of the 227.3 transition. Note that even with M1 multipolarity of the 70.9 transition, its total intensity (I(|g+ce)) is about 2.7 times larger than that of the 227 transition whereas one would expect equal intensity if the decay scheme of the isomer is complete 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$this transition is unlikely to be the isomeric transition since the implied B(M1) or B(E2) would be too small to be consistent with expected transition rates from Weisskopf estimates 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$from {+54}Fe({+58}Ni,2pn|g) (1995Do13) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.25 {i8}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.00 {i9} (2000Bo29), R(DCO)=0.90 {i10} (2000Bo29), R=0.99 {i13} (1995Do13), DCO=0.7 {i1} (1995Pa01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 265.5 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 265.0 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 265.2 {I5} from 1995Do13. 
M$R(DCO)=0.71 {i6} (2000Bo29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 538.5 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 538.0 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 537.6 {I5} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.43 {i13}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0) (2000Bo29); R(DCO)=0.80 {i6} (2000Bo29), DCO|?0.5 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 592.1 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 592.4 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 591.9 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.10 {i4}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0) (2000Bo29); R(DCO)=0.69 {i3} (2000Bo29), R=0.94 {i17} (1995Do13), DCO=1.0 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.8 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 225.3 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 225.0 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 224.6 {I5} from 1995Do13. 
M$R(DCO)=0.75 {i4} (2000Bo29), DCO=0.6 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.6 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 763.2 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 763.0 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 763.0 {I3} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.28 {i4}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0) (for 760.3+763.2|g) (2000Bo29); R(DCO)=0.88 {i3} (2000Bo29), R=1.51 {i25} (1995Do13), DCO=1.2 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.1 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 674.5 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 675.0 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 674.2 {I2} from 1995Do13. 
M$R(DCO)=0.88 {i7} (for 672.2|g+674.5|g) (2000Bo29), R=1.6 {i3} (1995Do13), DCO|?1.1 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 317.0 {i3} (2012Pr10), 316.2 {I2} (1995Do13) 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.33 {i11}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0) (2000Bo29); R(DCO)=1.02 {i8} (2000Bo29), DCO|?0.5 (1998De44). R=1.7 {i7} from 1995Do13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 326.5 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 326.0 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 326.1 {I2} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.21 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.05 {i3}, R(DCO)=0.61 {i3}, |d(Q/D)=0.03 {i4} (2000Bo29); a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.33 {i6}, |d(Q/D)=0, DCO|?0.6 (1998De44); R=0.75 {i10} (1995Do13), DCO=0.6 {i1} (1995Pa01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 399.2 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 399.0 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 398.7 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.23 {i3}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.01 {i4}, |d(Q/D)=-0.025 {i25}, R(DCO)=0.64 {i3} (2000Bo29); R=0.80 {i12} (1995Do13), DCO|?0.5 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 661.3 {I6} from 2000Bo29 and 662.0 {I6} from 2012Pr10, 
M$R(DCO)=0.98 {i8} (2000Bo29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 760.3 {I6} from 2000Bo29, 760.3 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 760.1 {I3} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.28 {i4}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0)(for 760.3|g+763.2|g), R(DCO)=0.88 {i3} (2000Bo29); R=1.4 {i4} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 494.5 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 494.4 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 494.3 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.283 {i21}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.003 {i26}, R(DCO)=1.10 {i4} (2000Bo29); R=1.47 {i22} (1995Do13), DCO=1.1 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 609.1 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 609.0 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 609.0 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.331 {i21}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.108 {i25}, R(DCO)=1.02 {i3} (2000Bo29); R=1.57 {i19} (1995Do13), DCO=1.1 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 853.8 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 853.8 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 853.3 {I5} from 1995Do13. 
M$R(DCO)=0.90 {i7} (for 848.8|g+853.8|g) (2000Bo29); R=1.5 {i5} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 695.2 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 695.0 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 695.2 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.330 {i22}, a{-4}/a{-0}=0.01 {i3} R(DCO)=1.00 {i3} (2000Bo29); R=1.57 {i20} (1995Do13), DCO=1.2 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 889.6 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 889.6 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 889.5 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.38 {i3}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0), R(DCO)=1.01 {i5} (2000Bo29); R=1.47 {i19} (1995Do13), DCO=1.0 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.9 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 895.7 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 895.9 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 895.9 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.31 {i7}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0), |d(Q/D)=-0.04 {i5}, R(DCO)=0.62 {i8} (2000Bo29); a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.25 {i4}, DCO|?0.5 (1998De44); R=1.0 {i4} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 933.7 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 933.7 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 933.9 {I1} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.35 {i4}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.09 {i5}, R(DCO)=1.01 {i4} (2000Bo29); R=1.60 {i24} (1995Do13), DCO=1.1 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 839.6 {I6} from 2000Bo29, 839.9 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 839.3 {I3} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.42 {i16}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.17 {i20}, |d(Q/D)=-0.11 {i12}, R(DCO)=0.87 {i7} (2000Bo29); a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.26 {i9}, DCO|?0.5 (1998De44); R=0.84 {i23} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 877.4 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 877.3 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 877.0 {I4} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.26 {i8}, a{-4}/a{-0}=+0.11 {i10}, R(DCO)=0.89 {i6} (2000Bo29); a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.39 {i8}, a{-4}=-0.14 {i3}, DCO|?0.9 (1998De44); R=1.6 {i5} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1015.8 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 1015.7 {I3} from 2012Pr10, and 1015.9 {I2} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.18 {i5}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.08 {i6}, R(DCO)=0.96 {i5} (2000Bo29); R=1.9 {i4} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 672.2 {I6} from 2000Bo29, 672.2 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 672.0 {I4} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.27 {i8}, DCO|?0.5 (1998De44); R(DCO)=0.88 {i7} (for 672.2|g+674.5|g) (2000Bo29), R=1.2 {i5} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 848.8 {I3} from 2000Bo29, 848.5 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 848.7 {I2} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.38 {i8}, a{-4}/a{-0}=-0.14 {i3}, DCO|?1.1 (1998De44); R(DCO)=0.90 {i7} (for 848.8|g+853.8|g) (2000Bo29), R=1.5 {i4} (1995Do13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1029.2 {I6} from 2000Bo29, 1029.4 {I6} from 2012Pr10, and 1029.5 {I5} from 1995Do13. 
M$R(DCO)=1.19 {i13} (2000Bo29), R=1.0 {i4} (1995Do13), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 989.4 {I3} from 2000Bo29 and 989.0 {I3} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.21 {i6}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0), R(DCO)=0.93 {i6} (2000Bo29); R=1.2 {i4} (1995Do13), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 973.4 {I6} from 2000Bo29 and 974.2 {I3} from 1995Do13. 
M$a{-2}/a{-0}=+0.51 {i12}, (a{-4}/a{-0} set to 0.0),R(DCO)=0.93 {i6} (2000Bo29); R=1.0 {i4} (1995Do13), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 97.8 {I5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: <10 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=0.99 {i13} (1995Do13), DCO=0.7 {i1} (1995Pa01). DCO|?1.0 from 1998De44 indicates E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 593.0 {I5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 14 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=0.94 {i17} (1995Do13), DCO=1.0 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.8 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 225.1 {I5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: <10 (1995Pa01) 
M$DCO=0.6 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.6 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 763.3 {I5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 32 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.51 {i25} (1995Do13), DCO=1.2 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.1 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 327.3 {I5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 29 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=0.75 {i10} (1995Do13), DCO=0.6 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.6 (1998De44), a{-2}/a{-0}=-0.33 {i6} and |d(Q/D)=0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 494.6 {i5} (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.47 {i22} (1995Do13), DCO=1.1 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 609.4 {i5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 95 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.57 {i19} (1995Do13), DCO=1.1 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 695.5 {i5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 94 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.57 {i20} (1995Do13), DCO=1.2 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 889.9 {i5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 90 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.47 {i19} (1995Do13), DCO=1.0 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?0.9 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 933.9 {i5} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 90 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.60 {i24} (1995Do13), DCO=1.1 {i1} (1995Pa01), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1016.1 {i3} (1995Pa01) 
RI$Other: 70 (1995Pa01) 
M$R=1.9 {i4} (1995Do13), DCO|?1.0 (1998De44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$Authors of 2007Pa34 adopted mult=M1+E2 for 668.6|g but did not quote any linear polarization measurements therefore |p is unknown 
$R(Angular)=0.91 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only in 1994Pa22; not confirmed in 2007Pa07 
M$DCO=0.52 {I3} from ({+58}Ni,4p|g) in 1994Pa22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed only in 1994Pa22; not confirmed in 2007Pa07 
M$DCO=1.07 {I21} from ({+58}Ni,4p|g) in 1994Pa22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
EKC$from K| x ray/I|g=0.17 {I2} (1972Br38), 0.14 {I3} (1972Va38) 
E from E|g,E(ce): 1972Br38 
K/L+M=5.5 {I2} (s), |a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.028 {I6} ce/I|g (1972Br38) 
HF(M2,280|g)=11.7 W.u. consistent with h11/2-to-g7/2 transitions 
Analogous transitions: HF(M2,101|g,{+115}Sn)=8.4 W.u.; HF(M2,661|g,{+113}Sn)=7.9 W.u. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$the intensity given by 1992ZiZW is an upper limit. The evaluators think that this measurement needs confirmation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unresolved doublet evidenced in self-coincidence. The revised placement of the 771.0 |g from the 5111 level requires I|g|<I|g(763) and since I|g(763)<I|g(771), most of the I|g(771) must belong to to the placement from 2774 
M$A{-2}=0.25 {I2}; A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$the authors' placement of 763|g (from a level with 14+) does not agree with other recent inbeam work (12+ to 10+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
The high attenuation of A{-2},A{-4} is due to a partial excitation through the 103-ms 11/2- state (1979Ha18) 
M A{-2}=0.10 {I2},A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 37 {I4} in {+118}I |b{++} decay (13.7 min, 8.5 min), 14 in (p,4n|g) 
M from {+118}I |b{++} decay (13.7 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$1987Wa17 deduced intensity of 957|g: I|g=0.3 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.08 {I2}; |a(K)(M2)=0.0044. However, existence of the 957|g has not been confirmed by other authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$1987Wa17 deduced intensity of 560|g: I|g=0.3 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.026 {I8}; |a(K)(M2)=0.019. However, existence of the |g has not been confirmed by other authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$1987Wa17 deduced intensity of 1517|g: I|g=0.13 {I4} and |a(K)exp=0.006 {I3}; |a(K)(M2)=0.0014. However, existence of the |g has not been confirmed by other authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M from |g-linear pol (1985RiZV) and |a(K)exp 
MR from |g-linear pol. Other: -0.025 {I35} from |g|g(|q) (1985Sh04) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0002 {I1} (1985Sh04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
R=1.50 {I7} 
Note misprint in table 1 of 2000Ju01 in the last two columns of J|p assignment: 11- to 9- should be 13- to 11- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ -0.35 {I2} or +11.0 {I+7-5} 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.095 {I+35-21}, B(E2)(W.u.)=28 {I+13-7} for |d=-0.35 {i2}; B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00085 {I+35-28}, B(E2)(W.u.)=264 {I+100-57} for |d=+11.0 {I+7-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.25 {I5} or +4.4 {I3} 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.024 {I+18-9}, B(E2)(W.u.)=10 {I+9-4} for |d=-0.25 {I5}; B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0012 {I+9-5}, B(E2)(W.u.)=166 {I+119-61} for |d=+4.4 {I3} 
RI$ from 2002Pa19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.36 {I2} or +16.0 {I20} 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.028 {I+14-6}, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.4 {I+19-9} for |d=-0.36 {I2}; B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00013 {I+6-5}, B(E2)(W.u.)=30 {I+16-7} for |d=+16.0 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$Possible combined from levels at 2999.4 and 2999.7 in ENSDF. However, the strong dipole character of 1179|g favors 7- origin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp value of 0.0134 {I5} in authors' table is a misprint (priv. comm. from first author of 1990Ma55). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.00 {I7} 
RI intensity includes that of other transition (feeding to 45/2- state at 6936 keV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M DCO 0.95 {I25} 
RI intensity includes that of other transition (feeding to 43/2- state at 6828 keV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI given for a doublet of 1133.6|g+1133.9|g 
M DCO|?0.5 (1995Pa28), 0.95 {I25} (1995Si25) 
I|g and DCO given for a doublet of 1133.9|g+1133|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 43 {I8} in |e decay (53 min), 48 {I5} in (|a,n|g),({+13}C,3n|g) 
MR other: 0.40 {I64} in |e decay (53 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 12.0 (1988Br38), 12.5 {I6} (1970LaZT), and 11.8 (1970Ga32) 
MR from -0.40<|d<-0.46 (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E assigned to 53-min {+120}I decay by 1970Ga32. 
E other: 974.6 {I4} (1969Sp07) 
RI from 1970LaZT. Other: 2.15 (1988Br38) 
MR from -6.0<|d<-0.65 (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E other: 653.6 {I6} (1969Sp07) 
RI from 0.31 (1988Br38) and 0.3 (1970Ga32) 
MR$assumed by the evaluators. Other: -0.44 {I+260-20} or +4.0 +1.0-2.4 (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI from 1.39 (1988Br38), 1.54 {I15} (1970LaZT), and 1.6 (1970Ga32). 
MR$assumed by the evaluators. Other: +0.13 {I3} or -8 {I+3-1} (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 0.49 (1988Br38), 0.41 {I8} (1970LaZT), and 0.6 (1970Ga32) 
MR from -4.0<|d<-0.35 (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1.23 (1988Br38), 1.13 {I13} (1970LaZT), and 1.2 (1970Ga32) 
MR +0.27 {I2} or +71 {I+10-49} (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E in 1970Ga32, placed to another level 
RI from 0.84 (1988Br38), 0.78 {I13} (1970LaZT), and 1.2 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E in 1970Ga32, placed to another level 
RI from 2.33 (1988Br38), 2.8 {I3} (1970LaZT), and 3.2 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from 0.64 (1988Br38) and 0.69 {I13} (1970LaZT) 
E in 1970LaZT, assigned to another level. And, 1970Ga32 assigned to 53-min {+120}I decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E in 1970LaZT and 1970Ga32, placed other levels respectively 
E other: 2128.6 {I7} (1969Sp07) 
RI others: 1.10 {I13} (1988Br38), 1.4 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E unplaced in 1970Ga32 and 1970LaZT 
RI from 0.62 (1988Br38), 0.56 {I9} (1970LaZT), and 0.6 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E in 1970Ga32, placed to another level 
RI from 1.83 (1988Br38), 1.39 {I14} (1970LaZT), and 1.8 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E in 1970LaZT, placed to another level; unplaced in (1970Ga32) 
RI from 0.28 (1988Br38). 0.49 {I10} (1970LaZT), and 0.5 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$in 1970LaZT and 1970Ga32, placed to other levels, respectively 
RI$from 1.08 (1988Br38) and 1.09 {I14} (1970LaZT). Other: 1.8 (1988Br38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E unplaced in 1970LaZT 
E other: 2807 (1970Ga32) 
RI from 0.91 {I13} (1970LaZT), 1.17 (1988Br38), and 1.4 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E in 1970LaZT, placed to another level 
E other: 1413 (1970Ga32) 
RI from 1.8 {I2} (1970LaZT), 1.24 (1988Br38), and 2.3 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E in 1970LaZT, placed to another level. In 1970Ga32, unplaced 
RI from 0.96 {I13} (1970LaZT), 0.84 (1988Br38), and 0.8 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E in 1970LaZT and 1970Ga32, placed to another level 
RI from 2.7 {I3} (1970LaZT), 3.59 (1988Br38), and 4.6 (1970Ga32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I(614|g)/I(654|g)=0.46/0.31 (1988Br38). Uncertainty is assumed by the evaluators based on that of 654|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$note that same branching ratio of 3.9 {I11} is quoted for its placement from 1984.0 and 2082.8 levels 
E$level-energy difference=880.99 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R{-|q}=0.92 {I13} from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014) 
M$revised assignment from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014). Earlier assignment was E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$R{-|q}=0.38 {I2} from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014) 
M$revised assignment from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014). Earlier assignment was E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-|q}=1.53 {I16} 
RI$ intensity of the transition is high due to the presence of a |g-ray with an energy of 1249.0 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$R{-|q}=1.00 {I8} from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014) 
M$revised assignment from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014). Earlier assignment was E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014) 
$Ordering of the 1055-994-1305 |g cascade is uncertain (2014Na30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$R{-|q}=0.91 {I18} 
M$revised assignment from priv. comm. (Sept 29, 2014). Earlier assignment was M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(second 2+ to first 2+)/B(E2)(first 2+ to 0+)=1.215 {I50} 
$B(E2)(second 2+ to first 2+)/B(E2)(second 2+ to 0+)=82.9 {I47} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,Q
decay_comment:
M $D(E1) assignment in {+114}Cd({+11}B,p3n|g) (1996Si24), while Q(E2) assignment in {+116}Cd({+9}Be,4n|g) (1996Pa11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
RI $average of 48 {I7} ({+114}Cd({+11}B,p3n|g)) and 38 {I6} ({+116}Cd({+9}Be,4n|g)) 
$Mult=E1 assumed in {+114}Cd({+11}B,p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0768 {I17} (1971Ed03), |a(K)exp=0.0842 {I14} (1968Ma52) L1:L2:L3=100:8.1:3.7 (1964Ch08). 1968Ma52 discussed the existence of dynamic penetration effect (|l=7 {I1}) in calculation of conversion coefficients. 1971Ed03 deduced |l=-0.7 {I17} from ce-ce(|q), ce|g(|q) 
MR$from 1971Ed03. Others: 0.230 (1968Ma52), 0.224 (1964Ch08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
TI$from an intensity balance at the 212 level 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
K:L:M:N=0.74:1.0:0.235:0.066 (1972Ka31,1972Ka61) K:L:M=0.82:1.0:0.23 (1968Ma52) K:L:M:N=0.83:1.0:0.24:0.059 (1968Ha53) 
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I6}; not resolved from neighboring peaks in ce spectra, |a(exp) value was derived from the ratio of |g and ce composite areas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0026 {I5}; not resolved from neighboring peaks in ce spectra, |a(exp) value was derived from the ratio of |g and ce composite areas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0039 {I6}; not resolved from neighboring peaks in ce spectra, |a(exp) value was derived from the ratio of |g and ce composite areas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M $DCO(D)=0.58 {I2} 
E$Value given by 1996Pa11 is 0.5 keV higher than other data: 144.5 in {+114}Cd({+11}B,p3n|g), 144.6 {I1} in {+119}Sn(|a,2n|g), {+121}Sb(d,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M $DCO(G)=0.68 {I2}, adopted from 1979Ha47 where angular distribution and linear polarization measurement were performed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M $DCO(G)=1.10 {I5}, adopted from 1979Ha47 where angular distribution and linear polarization measurement were performed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M $DCO(G)=0.28 {I2}, adopted from 1979Ha47 where angular distribution and linear polarization measurement were performed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M $DCO(G)=1.06 {I3}, adopted from 1979Ha47 where angular distribution and linear polarization measurement were performed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M $DCO(G)=0.39 {I4}, adopted from 1979Ha47 where angular distribution and linear polarization measurement were performed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M $DCO(G)=0.93 {I4}, adopted from 1979Ha47 where angular distribution and linear polarization measurement were performed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=41.1 {I3} 
M $A{-2}=+0.14 {I6}, A{-4}=0.00 {I8}, L(p)=-0.31 {I5}; |a(K)exp=0.17 {I2}, K/L=7.6 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=51.3 {I8} 
M $A{-2}=+0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6}, L(p)=+0.30 {I8}; |a(K)exp=0.077 {I4}, K/L=5.0 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=29.4 {I5} 
M $A{-2}=+0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8}, L(p)=+0.40 {I13}; |a(K)exp(475.2|g + 470.8|g)=0.0074 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$I|g=28.2 {I3} 
M $A{-2}=+0.04 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.043 {I6}, M1+E2 was assigned (1979Ha47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=9.2 {I6} 
TI$obscured or disturbed by other |g in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g) 
M $A{-2}=+0.24 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.23 {I17}, L(p)=+0.39 {I15}; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=26.0 {I5} 
M $A{-2}=+0.24 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I9}, L(p)=+0.39 {I15}; |a(K)exp(475.2|g + 470.8|g)=0.0074 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=7.2 {I2} 
TI$doublet (293.3|g+292.3|g) in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g) 
M $A{-2}=-0.47 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I16} for (292.3|g+293.3|g) |a(K)exp=0.024 {I4} for (292.3|g+293.3|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=45.0 {I12} 
TI$Multiply-placed |g ray with intensity not divided in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g) 
M $A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4}, L(p)=+0.55 {I9}; |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=6.0 {I4} 
E adopted from level scheme (authors gave a value of 535.6 keV in their table) 
M $A{-2}=+0.21 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I15}, L(p)=+0.37 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=21.4 {I6} 
M $A{-2}=-0.64 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I6}, L(p)=+0.04 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I7} 
MR -0.43|<|d|<-0.28 or -2.3|<|d|<-1.6. |d value given in the authors' table for the 677.8 keV, shown as (E2). was interpreted as the data for this |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.4 {I4} 
TI$Multiply-placed |g ray with intensity not divided in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g) 
M $A{-2}=-0.98 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I8}, L(p)=+0.14 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
TI$not determined in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g)) 
M $A{-2}=+0.47 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I13}, L(p)=+0.93 {I24}; |a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.0 {I3} 
TI $obscured or disturbed by other |g in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g) 
M $A{-2}=+0.46 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI $not determined in {+121}Sb(d,2n|g)) 
M $A{-2}=-0.31 {I12}, A{-4}=0.00 {I15}, L(p)=-0.31 {I9} 
MR -0.03 {I7} (if D+Q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.6 {I3} 
M $A{-2}=-0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I7}, L(p)=-0.27 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.024 {I2}, K/L=8 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M D+Q in (|a,2n|g) and (n,n'|g) (1990BeYR); RUL 
MR$from (n,n'|g) (1990BeYR); others: -1.5 {I+8-8} in (n,n'|g) (2005Hi04); -3.7 {I+11-7} (1977Kr17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$others: -0.57 {i5} in (|a,2n|g), +4.5 {I+7-6} in (n,n'|g) (1990BeYR) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0225 {I7}; B(E2)(W.u.)=14.4 {I9} (if |d=-0.69); B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0016 {I8}; B(E2)(W.u.)=43 {I18} (if |d=+4.5) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-32 {I+16-1223} in (n,n'|g) (2005Hi04); -0.3<|d<0.0 in (|a,2n|g); -70 {I+28-180} in (n,n'|g) (1990BeYR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from (n,n'|g) (2005Hi04); others: +0.04<|d<+0.50 in (n,n'|g) (1990BeYR), -0.20 {I+11-7} in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR $+1.3 {i3} or +0.32 {i15-10} in (n,n'|g) (2005Hi04); other: 0.11 {i6} or +1.7 {i2} in (n,n'|g) (1990BeYR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=564.2 {i3}, I|g=100 (1982Ch01); E|g=563.6, I|g=100 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=+0.29 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} (1971Ke20); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=613.7 {i3}, I|g=73 {i7} (1982Ch01); E|g=616.9, I|g=90 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.37 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=+0.32 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1971Ke20); |a(K)exp=0.0033 {i7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E|g=692.8 {i3}, I|g=3 {i1} (1982Ch01); E|g=692.7, I|g=4 (1971Ke20); 
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I9} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=-0.15 {I10} (1971Ke20) A{-2}=+0.16 {I4} (evaluator assumes the sign=+ is probably wrong), A{-4}=-0.14 {I5} (1991Le03); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=1256.6 {i3}, I|g=2 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.06 {I5} (1982Ch01); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=570.1 {i3}, I|g=38 {i4} (1982Ch01) E|g=569.5, I|g=65 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.39 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=+0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1971Ke20); |a(K)exp=0.0049 {i8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E|g=728.5 {i3}, I|g=3 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=-0.03 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I17} (1991Le03); A{-2}=-0.04 {I3} (1982Ch01); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=1345.5 {i3}, I|g=3 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.19 {I4} (1982Ch01); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E|g=694.3 {i3}, I|g=7 {i1} (1982Ch01) E|g=692.7, I|g=4 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=-0.07 {I6} (1982Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E|g=859.9 {i3}, I|g=2 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I10} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.29 {I6} (1982Ch01); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E|g=532.7 {i3}, I|g=6 {i1} (1982Ch01); E|g=532.4, I|g=9 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.13 {I3} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=+0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10} (1971Ke20); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=1102.7 {i3}, I|g=4 {i1} (1982Ch01) E|g=1102.6, I|g=4 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=+0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I15} (1971Ke20); RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E|g=1226.2 {i3}, I|g=6 {i1} (1982Ch01) E|g=1126.1, I|g=7 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 (1991Le03); A{-2}=-0.21 {I3} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I12} (1971Ke20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=918.6 {i3}, I|g=10 {i3} (1982Ch01); E|g=919.0, I|g=36 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=+0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I3} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.34 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=+0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1971Ke20); |a(K)exp=0.0020 {i5}; RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=1049.9, I|g=17 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 (1991Le03); A{-2}=-0.24 {I3} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=-0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I8} (1971Ke20); |DJ=1, |D|p=yes from adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E|g=1139.1 {i3}, I|g=2 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=-0.88 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=-0.91 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I6} (1982Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E|g=1162.0 {i3}, I|g=2 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I4} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.38 {I7} (1982Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E|g=1220.6 {i3}, I|g=2 {i1} (1982Ch01); E|g=1220.5, I|g=4 (1971Ke20) 
M$A{-2}=-0.34 {I33} A{-4}=0.00 (1991Le03); A{-2}=-0.34 {I6} (1982Ch01); A{-2}=-0.26 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I15} (1971Ke20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g=273.2 {i3}, I|g=1 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
$A{-2}=+0.45 {I38}, A{-4}=0.00 (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.38 {I7} (1982Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E|g=297.4 {i3}, I|g=1 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I9}, A{-4}=0.00 (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I7} (1982Ch01); (D+Q) from DCO in (9Be,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E|g=622.1 {i3}, I|g=1 {i1} (1982Ch01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I5} (1991Le03); A{-2}=+0.13 {I6} (1982Ch01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1991Le03) 
E$1991Le03 placed directly on 2670 keV level in (|a,2n|g), but evaluator displaced this as a transition from (14+) to (12+) in band 2 (adopted levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Originally placed between the levels 2439.8, J|p=1,2+ and 1256.9, J|p=2+ in 1990BeYR, but evaluator replaced because the present placement is consistent with (n,n'|g) E=1.8,3.7,3.4 MeV in E|g, I|g and |g(|q) 
A{-2}=+0.001 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.028 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.057 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.132 {I18}; RUL; lin pol=+1.2 {I+11-5} (if A{-4}|=0) 
MR $-70 {I9-192} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.141 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.090 {I16}; RUL 
$ ^A{-0}=20.18 8 
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=692.84 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.00 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I5}; RUL 
$ ^A{-0}=3.89 4 
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=770.38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I3}; RUL 
$ ^A{-0}=7.25 5 
MR$-32 {I+16-1223} 
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1387.62 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|D|p=yes from adopted levels; A{-2}=-1.7 {I5}, A{-4}=-1.0 {I6} 
$A{-2} and A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seem unrealistically large in magnitude (Evaluator) 
$ ^A{-0}=0.153 16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.287 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.030 {I24}; |D|p=yes from adopted levels 
$ ^A{-0}=14.10 7 
E$poor fit. level-energy difference=1632.68 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} 
RI$69.4(1) IN TABLE ^I OF 2005Hi04 IS READ AS 69.4 {I10} BY EVALUATOTR, OTHERWISE THE UNCERTAINTY OF 0.1 IS UNREALISTIC 
$ ^A{-0}=5.13 5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+3.52 {I13}, A{-4}=+3.35 {I13} 
$A{-2} and A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seem unrealistically large in magnitude 
$ ^A{-0}=0.213 7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} 
$ ^A{-0}=0.719 11 
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1749.21 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d value (+14<|d<-0.4) is given in table 1 of 2005Hi04, but no A{-2} and A{-4} are given in 2005HiZZ. See comment in 1856|g 
$ ^A{-0}=0.143 7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I16}: these values are not consistent with the 2+ to 4+ transition. the evaluator assumes these values belong to the 1780.08|g. 
$ ^A{-0}=0.122 6 
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1855.77 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I6} 
$ ^A{-0}=0.649 10 
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1888.03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-1.4 {I4}, A{-4}=-1.1 {I3} 
$A{-2} and A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seem unrealistically large in magnitude (Evaluator) 
$ ^A{-0}=0.131 10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.26 {I6}, A{-4}=-4.1 {I11} 
$A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seems unrealistically large (Evaluator) 
$ ^A{-0}=0.045 6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2} and A{-4} A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seem unrealistically large in magnitude (compilers' note) 
$ ^A{-0}=0.153 16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ 69.4(1) IN TABLE ^I OF 2005Hi04 IS READ AS 69.4 10 BY COMPILERS, OTHERWISE THE UNCERTAINTY OF 0.1 IS UNREALISTIC 
$ ^A{-0}=5.13 5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2} and A{-4} A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seem unrealistically large in magnitude (compilers' note) 
$ ^A{-0}=0.213 7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2} and A{-4} A{-4} quoted by 2005HiZZ seem unrealistically large in magnitude (compilers' note) 
$ ^A{-0}=0.131 10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(second 2+ to first 2+)/B(E2)(first 2+ to 0+)=0.954 {I74} 
$B(E2)(second 2+ to first 2+)/B(E2)(second 2+ to 0+)=102 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 159.00 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay, 159.00 {I3} from {+123}Te IT decay, 158.99 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 158.9 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
M$from ce data in {+123}Te IT decay and {+123}I |e decay and |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation 
MR$unweighed average of 0.062 {+10-11} (from B(E2)=0.018 {I5} in Coulomb excitation, adopted T{-1/2}=196 ps {I10} and adopted |a(exp)=0.1910 {I14} from {+123}Te IT decay), +0.06 {I4} from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1964Al28), 0.103 {I7} from independently measured |d{+2} from ce-|g(|q) or |g|g(|q) in {+123}Te IT decay, 0.09 {I+4-7} deduced (by the evaluator using the BrIccMixing code) from all measured conversion coefficients in {+123}Te IT decay and {+123}I |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 281.03 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay, 281.01 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 280.8 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+123}I |e decay. Other: 18.5 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+123}I |e decay (1969Se09); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: |d(Q/D)=-2.9 {I28} from particle-|g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1989Be22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 440.02 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay, 440.01 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th, and 439.7 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+123}I |e decay and (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1974Ro40); M2 ruled out by RUL. Others: |d(Q/D)=+0.14 to 0.20 or -4.9 to -2.5 from |g(|q) anisotropy in {+123}I |e decay (1979Sc13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 346.36 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay, 346.37 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 346.2 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$weighted average of 41.9 {I9} from {+123}I |e decay and 41.4 {I12} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+123}I |e decay (1969Se09); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: |d(Q/D)=1.9 from particle-|g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1989Be22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 505.33 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay, 505.38 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 505.1 {I1} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from {+123}I |e decay. Other: 100 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 
M$Q from |g(|q) anisotropy in {+123}I |e decay (1979Sc13); E2 required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 247.97 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay and 247.80 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 5.45 {I12} from {+123}I |e decay and 6.1 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) anisotropy in {+123}I |e decay (1979Sc13); M1+E2 required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 528.97 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay, 529.01 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 528.8 {I5} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$other: 100 {I8} from {+123}I |e decay. 
M$from |g|g(|q) in {+123}I |e decay (1969Se09), with |d(Q/D)=-2.8 {I+6-7} or -0.09 {I6}; M1+E2 required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 687.94 {I8} from {+123}I |e decay and 687.91 {I12} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+123}I |e decay. Other: 10 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 624.58 {I5} from {+123}I |e decay (13.2234 h), 624.65 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 624.5 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+123}I |e decay and (n,|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) anisotropy (1979Sc13) and |g|g(|q) (1969Se09) in {+123}I |e decay, with |d(Q/D)=+0.10 to +0.18 or +2.3 to +4.9 from |g(|q) (1979Sc13); M2 ruled by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 783.60 {I6} from {+123}I |e decay (13.2234 h) and 783.62 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 68.2 {I22} from {+123}I |e decay (13.2234 h) and 74 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) anisotropy, with |d(Q/D)=+0.20 to +0.33 or -4.9 to -3.0 in {+123}I |e decay (1979Sc13); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 405.02 {I13} from {+123}I |e decay and 404.8 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$other: |?4.1 from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 454.76 {I15} from {+123}I |e decay and 454.4 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$other: 7.1 {I21} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 735.87 {I11} from {+123}I |e decay, 735.86 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 735.7 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I13} from {+123}I |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 877.52 {I17} from {+123}I |e decay and 877.67 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 93 {I12} from {+123}I |e decay and 72 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1036.63 {I17} from {+123}I |e decay, 1036.69 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1036.6 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I8} from {+123}I |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 562.79 {I12} from {+123}I |e decay and 562.71 {I18} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 57 {I9} from {+123}I |e decay and 52 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 578.26 {I20} from {+123}I |e decay and 578.42 {I15} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I26} from {+123}I |e decay and 61 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 628.26 {I22} from {+123}I |e decay and 628.16 {I14} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$other: 100 {I16} from {+123}I |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 909.12 {I12} from {+123}I |e decay and 909.29 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 82 {I6} from {+123}I |e decay and 78 {I13} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1068.12 {I15} from {+123}I |e decay and 1068.58 {I23} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+123}I |e decay. Other: |?65 from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from energies of conversion electrons in 1964Ch08. Other: 159.0 {I1} (1973Ra32) 
RI$absolute emission probability=0.839 {I6} from measured activity with liquid scintillator and |g-ray intensity with a HPGe detector in 1992Co11; 0.8481 {I32} (2|p and 4|p) and 0.8407 {I9} (slope) from 4|p|b-|g-coin in 1992Ja15; 0.832 {I5} from 4|p|b-|g-coin in 1992ScZZ; 0.8365 {I43} deduced (by evaluator) from |a(exp)=0.1954 {I61} in 1964Ch18; 0.8348 {I29} deduced (by evaluator) from |a(exp)=0.1970 {I41} in 1966Ha03 
M$|a(K)exp=0.169 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.0201 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.00138 {I10}, |a(L3)exp=0.000389 {I30}, |a(M)exp=0.00454 {I23} (1964Ch08, 1964Ch18); |a(K)exp=0.170 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.0229 {I9}, |a(M+N+...)=0.0050 {I5} (1966Ha03); |a(K)exp=0.165 {I5}, K:L=6.6 {I3} (1956Go23); |a(K)exp=0.19 {I2} (1954Mc10); |a(K)exp=0.18 {I8}, K:L=8.9 {I8} (1950Ka04). The experimental total conversion coefficient |a(exp)=0.192 {I9} (deduced from %I|g=0.839 {I6} in 1992Co11), 0.202 {I7} (deduced from %I|g=0.832 {I5} in 1992ScZZ), 0.1895 {I13} (slope method) and 0.1932 {I46} (2|p and 4|p methods) in 1992Ja15, 0.1954 {I61} in 1964Ch08 and 0.1979 {I41} in 1966Ha03 both from sum of all ce lines, with the weighted average equal to 0.1910 {I14} 
MR$values from this study: 0.103 {I7} from |d{+2}=0.0107 {I14}, unweighted average of 0.0119 {I9} from ce-|g(|q) in 1969To02, 0.011 {I8} from |g|g(|q) in 1966Gu02, 0.013 {I1} from ce-|g(|q) in 1955Go61, 0.0067 {I11} from ce data in 1964Ch08; 0.09 {I+4-6} from all conversion coefficients given above (using the BrIccMixing code) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$1964Ch18 quote this value as from 1964Ch08 of the same author; but this value is not shown in 1964Ch08. The uncertainty is assumed (by the evaluator) to be the same as that of 159|g in 1964Ch08. Other: 88.5 {I1} (1973Ra32) 
RI$from I(159.0|g)/I(88.5|g)=906 {I33} (1972Ra07). 
M$adopted assignment from ratios between |a(K)=455 {I9} (theoretical value for normalization), |a(L1)exp=171 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=42.1 {I40}, |a(L3)exp=269 {I9},|a(M1)exp=38.6 {I35}, |a(M2)exp+|a(M3)exp=66.9 {I35}, |a(M4)exp+|a(M5)exp=2.98 {I50} (1964Ch18), and from K:L:M:N=0.93 {I4}:1:0.236 {I13}:0.058 {I4} (1972Ka31). Total conversion coefficient |a(exp)=1082 {I17} from 1964Ch18, 1076 {I42} from 1972Ra07 based on assumed |a(K)=0.189 {I14} for 159|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 159.0 (1989Be22) 
MR$from |g(|q) in 1964Al28. Other: 0.02 to 1.8 from particle-|g(|q) in 1989Be22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 281.3 (1989Be22), 280.6 (1970Se03) 
MR$from -5.6<|d<-0.1 from particle-|g(|q) in 1989Be22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 440.2 (1989Be22), 439.2 (1970Se03) 
RI$other: I(440|g)/I(281|g)=87/13 (1975An16) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in 1974Ro40. Other: 0.1<|d<1.7 from particle-|g(|q) in 1989Be22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 159.1 {I1} (1968Ra11), 159.0 {I3} (1970Sp03), and 158.97 {I5} (1976Wa13). Other: 159 {I1} (1967Se05) 
MR$0.18 {I+8-14} from |a(exp)=0.1905 {I32} (2012Ko47), using the BrIccMixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 281.0 {I5} (1968Ra11), 281.3 {I5} (1970Sp03), 282 {I1} (1967Se05). Other: 282 {I1} (1967Se05), 275 {I10} (1960Gu02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.08 {I1} (1968Ra11), 0.08 {I3} (1970Sp03), 0.095 {I3} (1976Wa13), and 0.0841 {I16} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.053 (1967Se05), 0.14 {I3} (1960Gu02) 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.26 {I3} of 281|g-159|g(|q) (1969Se09), also giving other possible |d=-1.9 {I5} which is less likely since it would require a much larger B(E2)(W.u.). Others: -0.08 to 0, or +3.4 to +4.9 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})<0.007 (|d<0) or 0.92 to 0.96 (|d>0), respectively, from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 440.4 {I5} (1968Ra11), 440.2 {I4} (1970Sp03), and 440.02 {I5} (1976Wa13). Others: 440 {I1} (1967Se05), 439.2 (1969Se09), 440.0 (1987Ja13), 435 {I10} (1960Gu02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.42 {I2} (1968Ra11), 0.42 {I8} (1970Sp03), 0.514 {I17} (1976Wa13), 0.464 {I9} (2012Ko47), 0.450 {I15} (1987Ja13), and 0.44 {I9} (1960Gu02). Other: 0.255 (1967Se05) 
MR$+0.14 to +0.20, or -4.9 to -2.5 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})=0.02 to 0.04 (|d>0) or 0.86 to 0.96 (|d<0), respectively, from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 346.6 {I5} (1968Ra11), 347.0 {I5} (1970Sp03), and 346.35 {I5} (1976Wa13). Others: 346 {I1} (1967Se05), 340 {I10} (1960Gu02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I3} (1960Gu02), 0.12 {I2} (1968Ra11), 0.11 {I3} (1970Sp03), 0.151 {I5} (1976Wa13), and 0.142 {I3} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.087 (1967Se05) 
MR$from A{-2}=+0.006 {I30} of 346|g-159|g(|q) in 1969Se09, also giving other possible |d=+3.4 {I+13-8} which is less likely since it would require a much larger B(E2)(W.u.). Others: +0.20 to +0.29 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})=0.04 to 0.08 (|d>0) from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13, with J(688)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 505.6 {I6} (1968Ra11), 505.6 {I5} (1970Sp03), 505 {I1} (1967Se05), 500 {I10} (1960Gu02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.31 {I5} (1968Ra11), 0.32 {I8} (1970Sp03), 0.379 {I12} (1976Wa13), 0.337 {I6} (2012Ko47), and 0.28 {I6} (1960Gu02). Other: 0.193 (1967Se05) 
M$Q from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 183.7 {I10} (1968Ra11), 183.0 {I7} (1970Sp03), and 182.61 {I6} (1976Wa13). Other: 183 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$weighted average of 0.03 {I2} (1968Ra11), 0.03 {I1} (1970Sp03), 0.0155 {I7} (1976Wa13), and 0.018 {I7} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.026 (1967Se05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 248.3 {I5} (1968Ra11), 248.4 {I5} (1970Sp03), and 247.96 {I5} (1976Wa13). Other: 248 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$weighted average of 0.08 {I1} (1968Ra11), 0.07 {I2} (1970Sp03), 0.085 {I3} (1976Wa13), and 0.0824 {I18} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.070 (1967Se05) 
MR$-0.55 to -0.14, or -2.1 to -1.0 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})=0.02 to 0.23 or 0.48 to 0.81 (|d<0), respectively, from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13, with J(688)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 529.0 {I4} (1968Ra11), 529.3 {I4} (1970Sp03), and 528.96 {I5} (1976Wa13). Others: 529.0 (1987Ja13), 530 {I10} (1960Gu02) 
RI$unweighted average of 1.27 {I11} (1968Ra11), 1.26 {I24} (1970Sp03), 1.67 {I5} (1976Wa13), 1.49 {I3} (2012Ko47), 1.411 {I29} (1987Ja13), and 2.0 {I3} (1960Gu02). Other: 0.780 (1967Se05) 
MR$-0.09 {I6} or -2.8 {I+6-7} deduced (by the evaluator) from A{-2}=-0.19 {I2} of 529|g-159|g(|q) in 1969Se09, using adopted |d(E2/M1)=+0.079 {I11} for 159|g, with J(688)=3/2. Others: +0.44 to +0.64, or +4 to +10 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})=0.16 to 0.29 or 0.94 to 0.99 (|d>0), respectively, from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13, with J(688)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 687.7 {I6} (1968Ra11), 687.7 {I5} (1970Sp03), and 687.95 {I8} (1976Wa13). Other: 688 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$weighted average of 0.03 {I1} (1968Ra11), 0.04 {I2} (1970Sp03), 0.0321 {I18} (1976Wa13), and 0.0321 {I9} (2012Ko47). Others: 0.017 (1967Se05), <0.08 (1960Gu02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 192.7 {I10} (1968Ra11), 193 {I1} (1970Sp03), and 192.17 {I7} (1976Wa13). Other: 192 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$weighted average of 0.03 {I2} (1968Ra11), 0.03 {I2} (1970Sp03), 0.0238 {I11} (1976Wa13), and 0.0194 {I9} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.023 (1967Se05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 538.5 {I5} (1968Ra11), 538.5 {I5} (1970Sp03), 538 {I1} (1967Se05), 538.0 (1987Ja13) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.32 {I2} (1968Ra11), 0.31 {I6} (1970Sp03), 0.458 {I15} (1976Wa13), 0.411 {I7} (2012Ko47) and 0.379 {I16} (1987Ja13). Other: 0.195 (1967Se05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 624.9 {I5} (1968Ra11), 624.9 {I5} (1970Sp03), and 624.57 {I5} (1976Wa13). Other: 624 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$weighted average of 0.08 {I1} (1968Ra11), 0.07 {I2} (1970Sp03), 0.100 {I3} (1976Wa13), and 0.0910 {I17} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.044 (1967Se05) 
MR$+0.10 to +0.18, or +2.3 to +4.9 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})=0.01 to 0.03 or 0.84 to 0.96 (|d>0), respectively, from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 784.4 {I6} (1968Ra11), 784.0 {I6} (1970Sp03), and 783.59 {I6} (1976Wa13). Other: 784 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$weighted average of 0.05 {I1} (1968Ra11), 0.05 {I2} (1970Sp03), 0.071 {I3} (1976Wa13), and 0.0624 {I12} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.030 (1967Se05) 
MR$+0.20 to +0.33, or -4.9 to -3.0 from |d{+2}/(1+|d{+2})=0.04 to 0.10 (|d>0) or 0.90 to 0.96 (|d<0), respectively, from |g(|q) anisotropy in 1979Sc13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 736.10 {I6} (1968Ra11), 735.6 {I6} (1970Sp03), 735.78 {I7} (1976Wa13), and 736 {I1} (1967Se05) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.04 {I1} (1968Ra11), 0.05 {I2} (1970Sp03), 0.074 {I3} (1976Wa13), and 0.0593 {I11} (2012Ko47). Other: 0.029 (1967Se05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Value of 887.52 listed in author's table 2 is a misprint. See FIG.4. 
RI$weighted average of 0.0013 {I8} (1976Wa13) and 0.00085 {I11} (2012Ko47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M from (n,|g) 
$ q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.087 {I23}, X(E0/E2)=0.014 {I4}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.012 {I3} (2005Ki02, evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
|g|g(|q) and ce(K) in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay 
RI Average of |B- decay, |e decay, (n,|g) E=thermal and (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
RI Average of |B- decay, |e decay, (n,|g) E=thermal and (n,n'|g) 
|g|g(|q) and |a(K)exp in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay 
MR from 1993Go10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Reported in (n,|g) E=thermal only; not reported in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d), {+124}I |e decay and (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and J|p's of relevant levels. 
Not observed in (n,n'|g) and (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E from 2000He14. 
M From |g|g(|q) and |a(K)exp in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d) 
MR from averaged A{-2} and A{-4} values of |g|g(|q) in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M From ce in (n,|g) E=thermal 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.8 {I4}, X(E0/E2)=2.1 {I10}, |r{+2}(E0)>0.3 (2005Ki02, evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and J|p's of relevant levels 
MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). others: -0.02 {I4} or +2.1 {I3} (1989GoZK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and |a(K)exp in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d) 
|d=-0.16 {I6} or +13 {I2} (1989GoZK) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Observed in (|a,2n|g) only: transition is questionable. (n,|g) E=thermal reports 1346.05 keV |g as unplaced |g. 
E,RI from (|a,2n|g) 
M,MR from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E from 2000He14 
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a(K)exp in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d) 
RI intensity ratios to 1368 keV |g are inconsistent between decay data and (n,|g) E=thermal data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Reported in {+124}I |e decay; not observed in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d), (n,n'|g) and (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Reported in (|a,2n|g) only; intensity too large not to be observed in other data sets. 
M from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ from authors' table II, 0.070 {I7} in authors' table I probably corresponds to total intensity for the doublet. Uncertainty is assigned by compilers 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E The uncertainty of the weighted average |g energies was too small, the evaluator assumed an uncertainty of 3 times of that. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E The uncertainty of the energy seems to be too small comparing with the energy difference of corresponding levels. The evaluator assumed 3 times larger uncertainty than reported one. 
M from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ uncertainty of 0% in table I of 2006Vo09 seems a misprint, compilers assign 50% for a weak |g ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I5} 
MR +0.003 {I6} for E2+M3 from averaged A{-2} and A{-4} values of |g|g(|q). others: +0.013 {I9} (1993Go10), +0.000 {I1} (1972Ba38,1976Be03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00246 {I16} 
MR others: +3.74 {I12} (1993Go10) (the sign seems to be mistyped), -3.3 {I2} (1972Ba38), -3.4 {I1} (1971Gr14), M1+E2(93% {I5}) (1979Sh08), M1+E2(93.5% {I6}) (1990Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I3} 
MR others: -0.8 {I+3-4} (1993Go10; 709-646-603 cascade), -1.0 {I+6-8} (1993Go10; 709-646 cascade), +0.04 {I+3-5} (1971Gr14), +0.02 {I+6-7} (1976Be03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I4} 
M,MR nuclear orientation and |a(K)exp give M1+E2 and +1.5 {I7}, but this transition is doublet from 2000Do11. others: +1.5 {I+6-3} (1972Ba38), +1.5 {I+5-2} (1971Gr14), -0.7 {I+4-5} (1993Go10), M1+E2(56% {I+7-11}) (1979Sh08), M1+E2(57% {I7}) (1990Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00246 {I17} 
M,MR nuclear orientation and |a(K)exp give E2(+M3) and -0.3 {I+2-3}, but this transition is doublet from 2000Do11. others: -0.15 {I+5-2} (1993Go10; 791-646 cascade), -0.32 {I+52-14} (1993Go10; 791-646-603 cascade) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00060 {I10} 
M,MR nuclear orientation and |a(K)exp give M1+E2 and +1.5 {I8}, but this transition is doublet from 2000Do11. others: +0.51 {I+13-11} (1993Go10), +3.7 {I+27-20} (1972Ba38), M1+E2(5.5% {I20}) (1979Sh08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00070 {I7} 
MR others: -0.03 {I+6-5} (1972Ba38), +0.038 {I3} (1993Go10), E1+M2(10% {I3}) (1979Sh08), E1+M2(11% {I2}) (1990Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00054 {I7} 
MR others: -0.05 {I4} (1993Go10; 1045-646 cascade), -0.14 {I+3-4} (1993Go10; 1045-646-603 cascade), +0.04 {I+5-4} (1972Ba38), E1+M2(1.5% {I15}) (1979Sh08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.000213 {I17} 
MR from averaged A{-2} and A{-4} values of |g|g(|q) others: -0.009 {I22} (1993Go10), -0.02 {I1} (1972Ba38), E1+M2(0.30% {I15}) (1979Sh08), E1+M2(0.30% {I12}) (1990Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.00032 {I6} 
MR others: -0.05 {I9} (1972Ba38), E1+M2(10.5% {I15}) (1979Sh08), E1+M2(7.2% {I12}) (1990Su11), >-0.50 (1993Go10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.000154 {I22} 
MR others: +0.00 {I+2-3} (1972Ba38), +0.031 {I6} (1993Go10), E1+M2(0.1% {I1}) (1990Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0004 {I3} 
MR 1983Ro13 deduced |d from nuclear orientation assuming that J|p of 2775-keV level is 3+ or 4+; +0.43 {I6} or +5.7 {I13} (J|p(2775)=3+), -0.12 {I8} or +1.2 (J|p(2775)=4+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L)exp=0.00058, |a(M)exp + |a(N)exp=0.00015, K/L=7.3 {I4} (1967Ru04) 
M from L/K ratio (1967Ru04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from 1971Zh01 
ce(K)(1658.0|g)/ce(K)(602.72|g)=0.00015 {I7} (1971Zh01) 
M from ce(K) 
TI deduced from ce(K) ratio (1971Zh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g placement from table 6 in 1998Wa18, the placement of depopulation from 2321 level in table 1 may be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$ |D(I|g)=1% in authors' table I, but I|g = 74.4(2.2)% in authors' text in section IV on page 10. The compilers use 2.2. 
M from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00381 {I16}, |a(L)exp=0.00043 {I10} 
MR others: -3.5 {I3} (1983Ro13), E0(30% {I5})+E2(64% {I1})+M1(6% {I1}) (1986Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0% in table I of 2006Vo09 seems a misprint, the compilers assign 1%, as for some other strong |g rays 
$|a(K)exp=0.00096 {I17}, |a(L)exp=0.00010 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00350 {I25} 
MR others: +0.0 {I2} (1983Ro13), E0(15% {I7})+E2(55% {I3})+M1(30% {I3}) (1986Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2,M1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20D) 
1986Su11 reported |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I6} which suggests E1 character, but the transition was assigned from 3755-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00076 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.00009 {I2} 
MR others: +0.13 {I12} (1983Ro13), E0(16% {I5})+E2(0.8% {I8})+M1(83% {I1}) (1986Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Not reported in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d), {+124}I |e decay and (n,n'|g) 
E$ poor fit. Level-energy difference=2091.51 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00073 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.00010 {I4} 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1983Ro13); others: -0.30 {I15} (J=1) (1983Ro13), E0(51% {I2})+E2(5% {I3})+M1(44% {I3}) (1986Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00051 {I12} 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1983Ro13); others: -0.32 {I12} (J=1) (1983Ro13), E0(8% {I1})+E2(9% {I5})+M1(83% {I5}) (1986Su11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
1995Ge06 observed no |g ray, except for 1235-keV |g from 2483-keV level, but in {+124}Sb |b{+-} decay (60.20 d), {+124}I |e decay, (|a,2n|g) and (n,n'|g) stronger |g's (444 and 525 keV) were observed and no |g of 1235 keV ({+124}I |e decay observed 1234-keV |g but the assignment is questionable) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=0.6 {I123} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>8.7|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=-44.4 {I106} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>10.8|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=6.5 {I88} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>6.2|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=-1.8 {I67} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>11.3|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=18.1 {I121} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>3.8|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=-8.1 {I85} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>6.2|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Number of events=-9.0 {I47} 
$Partial T{-1/2}{-1/2} (0|n+2|n)>10.8|*10{+19} y (90% confidence level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.59 {I+8-4} or -7.6 {I+14-23} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=29.9 {I+17-12} or 114 {I4} 
$B(M1)=0.114 {I+4-7} or 2.6|*10{+-3} {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+2.12 {I+18-15} or +0.06 {I3} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.1 {I+6-5} or 1.4|*10{+-2} {I2} 
$B(M1)=3.9|*10{+-3} {I+7-6} or 2.1|*10{+-2} {I+4-3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.16 {I+19-13} or +1.56 {I+56-44} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.6|*10{+-2} {I+8-6} or 1.3 {I3} 
$B(M1)=1.6|*10{+-2} {I+3-2} or 4.7|*10{+-3} {I+11-8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(second 2+ to first 2+)/B(E2)(first 2+ to 0+)=1.11 {I18} 
$B(E2)(second 2+ to first 2+)/B(E2)(second 2+ to 0+)=154 {I35} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(relative)=100 
$Corresponding I|g/100 decays=62.9 {I6} in {+124}I |e decay dataset in the ENSDF database, taken from 1992Wo03: Applied Rad. and Isot. 43, 551 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI From intensity balance. Experimental value is 15.2 {I10} 
M From {+125}I |e decay 
|a(L)exp=1.70 {I17}, L1:L2:L3=100:9.3:1.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR Weighted av from -0.58 {I7} (1997De38), -0.59 {I2} (1998Ro20) and -0.62 {I3} (from the L subshell ratios and the sign from alignment measurement (1972Ke19)) 
|a(K)exp=0.138 {I10}, K/L=6.5 {I5}, L1:L2:L3=100:23.8:18.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR Weighted av from +1.3 {I2} (1997De38), +1.74 {I9} (1998Ro20) and +1.60 {I2} (1998Ro20) 
|a(K)exp=0.090 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR From adopted gammas 
|a(K)exp=12.1 {I7} (1982Mu02), 11.8 {I3} (if |a=13.65 {I55}) (1969Ma46) 
L1:L2:L3=100 {I1}:9.54 {I18}:2.3 {I5} (1982Br16) 
See also 1982Br16 for other subshell |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M From |a data 
|a(exp)=357 {I11} (1977So06); 304 {I17} (if |a(35.5 keV)=14.0) (1982Mu02); 318 {I40} (1998Sa36) 
|a(K)exp=169 {I7} (weighted av of 167 {I11}, 171 {I10} and 168 {I22}) (1982Mu02); 166 {I9} (1998Sa36), 166 {I11} (1998Sa55) 
|a(M)exp=22.4 {I18} (1998Sa36) 
K/L=1.28 {I9} (1998Sa36) 
L1:L2:L3=0.784 {I5}:0.1761 {I18}:1.0 (1989Da19). Others: 1972Br02 
$See 1989Da19 for M, N subshell ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From wavelength of 349.328 {I5} m~' (1976Mi18) and conversion factor of 12398.520 keV m~' from 2000He14 
RI From 1990Iw04. Others: 6.8 {I3} (1969Ka08), 6.51 {I13} (1983De11) 
MR Recommended values from 1977Kr13; |d=0.029 {I3} (1982Br16) 
M From |a(K)exp=12.0 {I4}, |a(exp)=13.7 {I6} (1969Ka08); L1:L2:L3=100 {I1}:9.54 {I18}:2.3 {I5} (1982Br16); see also 1982Br16 for other subshell |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.30 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10} for 605.8( {+116}Sn(|a,2n){+118}Te)+606.8+615.0({+116}Sn(|a,2n){+118}Te) (1972Ke19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 1999Ho01 give the branching of 7.9 to 100 for 261-keV |g. 1998Ho16 give the intensity of 0.04 with uncertainty of 7.9 %. Branching of 7.9 in 1999Ho01 seems to be typo. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym}=+0.02 {I3} 
M$M1 from spin-parities proposed by 2019Ch15, but positive |D{-asym} indicates E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$deduced by 2019Te04 by fitting to literature values and their ce data. 
$L2/L1=0.085 {I3}, L3/L1=0.019 {I3}, M1/L1=0.202 {I5}, M2/M1=0.095 {I6}, M3/M1=0.023 {I7}, N1/M1=0.18 {I2} (2019Te04) 
$2019Te04 deduce a penetration parameter |l=-1.2 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted av. of values in (n,n'|g), (n,|g) and |e decay. 
M from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$weighted av. of I|g's in |e decay, (n,|g) and (n,n'|g) (1988Be51 and 2004Va16). 
MR From |g|g(|q) in |e decay (1971Ta04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,|g). Large branching of 73 {I3} and 74 {I3} from (n,n'|g) suggests that not all of the intensity of this transition in (n,n'|g) belongs with the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted av. of I|g's in (n,n'|g). Large branching of 22.4 {I11} from (n,|g) suggests that not all of the intensity of this transition in (n,|g) belongs with the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
MR$ +0.03 {I+9-6]} (2004Va16). -0.03 {I+9-6} (2008Hi17). -0.04 {I3} (p=94%) or +2.84 {I24} (p=6%) (1988Be51). 0.09 {I14} or +1.8 {I+7-4} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+2.7 {I+25-6} or +0.47 {I+24-10} (2004Va16), +19 {I+10-5} (p=80%) or +0.196 {I+23-12} (p=20%) (1988Be51), +0.14 {I9} or >+20 (<-20) (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted av. of I|g's in (n,n'|g). Large branching of 21 {I8} from (n,|g) suggests that not all of the intensity of this transition in (n,|g) belongs with the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted av. of I|g's in (n,|g) and in (n,n'|g) (1988Be51). other 69.2 {I24} from (n,n'|g) (2004Va16) assuming I|g = 100 for 257.55|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted av. of I|g's in (n,|g) and in (n,n'|g) (1988Be51). other 100.0 {I24} from (n,n'|g) (2004Va16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted av. of I|g's in (n,|g) and in (n,n'|g) (1988Be51). other 67.8 {I24} from (n,n'|g) (2004Va16) assuming I|g = 100 for 257.55|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted av. of values in (n,n'|g), |b{+-} decay (12.35 d) and |e decay 
RI$weighted av. of values in (n,n'|g), |b{+-} decay (12.35 d), |e decay and ({+7}Li,p4n|g). 
M$Q from ({+7}Li,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted av. of values in (n,n'|g), (n,|g), |b{+-} decay (12.35 d) and |e decay 
RI$weighted av. of values in (n,n'|g), |b{+-} decay (12.35 d), |e decay and ({+7}Li,p4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted av. of E|g's in (n,n'|g), (n,|g) and |b{+-} decay (12.35 d) 
RI$From |b{+-} decay (12.35 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted av. of E|g's in (n,n'|g), (n,|g) and |b{+-} decay (12.35 d) 
RI$weighted av. of E|g's in (n,n'|g) and (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$2004Va16 in (n,n'|g) give E|g=758.00 {I16} and branching=33 {I7}. However the E|g is poor fit and the large branching suggests that the |g is doublet line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From (n,|g). Large branching of 96 {I4} and 96 {I5} from (n,n'|g) suggests that not all of the intensity of this transition in (n,n'|g) belongs with the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$E|g from (n,|g). E|g=1258.53 {I5} from 2004Va16 in (n,n'|g) is poor fit. Branching from weighted av. from (n,n'|g) and (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Bu28. The authors of 1975Ba17 quoted E|g=694.8 {I2} in text from 1972SoZQ. However, there is no uncertainty of the E|g in 1972SoZQ. 
RI$I|g=129 {I7} (Sum 695|g and 697|g) (1975Ba17). I|g=100 from 1972Bu28, 1972SoZQ, 1969KlZZ. From the decay scheme and |a, I|g=100 is apparent and the uncertainty is negligibly small. 
|a(K)exp(695|g+697|g)=0.0030 (1971Or04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.015 (1971Or04). Obtained from ratio of |a(K)exp(414.8|g) to |a(K)exp(666.3|g) (1971Or04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$This transition was found from |g|g coin. E|g from the difference of the level energies assigned to the transition. RI from |g|g coin (1975Ba17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Bu28. However, the authors of 1975Ba15 state that they do not see the line in |g|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Bu28. The authors of 1975Ba17 quoted E|g=696.7 {I3} in text from 1972SoZQ. However, there is no uncertainty of the E|g in 1972SoZQ. 
RI$from 1969KlZZ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D,Q)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1997Sc15 proposed two possible placements of this |g. The placement from 3015 level is consistent with other datasets, but the placemen from a 3680 level is not. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100.0 {I10} 
TI$The authors give 100.0 {I1}. The uncertainty is too small and it may be a misprint. 
MR$ -4.5 {I+10-17} or -0.78 {I+14-5}. Others: -7.2 {I+10-16} (1998Be51), -7.0 {I+21-12} (1980De07). 
$ A{-2}=-0.112 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.041 {I17}; pol.=+0.75 {I+6-7}: Other; A{-2}=-0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1980De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I3} 
A{-2}=+0.186 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I12}; pol.=+4.6 {I+31-9}: Other; A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} (1980De07) 
MR$from 1988Be51. others: -0.26 {I+10-3} (2004Va16), -0.14 {I6} or 1.25 {I20} (1980De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=15.4 {I15} 
A{-2}=+0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} 
MR$ Other: -0.07 {I6} (p=90%) or +3.3 {I+6-5} (p=10%) (1988Be51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=44.4 {I11} 
MR$ +0.03 {I+9-6]} (2004Va16). -0.03 {I+9-6} (2008Hi17). -0.04 {I3} (p=94%) or +2.84 {I24} (p=6%) (1988Be51). 0.09 {I14} or +1.8 {I+7-4} (1980De07). 
A{-2}=+0.160 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.002 {I13}: Other; A{-2}=0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=0.10 {I10} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=35 {I3} 
RI$Evaluators calculated from the branching ratio and the I|g of 1447|g. It has not been seen in 1988Be51 but this would be masked by the strong 695|g with I|g=22.3(8). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I3} 
A{-2}=-0.064 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.107 {I22}; pol.=+2.4 {I+7-4}: Other; A{-2}=-0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1980De07) 
MR$From 1988Be51. Others: -3.9 {I+8-13} (2004Va16), +0.02 {I4} or +4.5 {I+10-7} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=28.1 {I15} 
MR$+2.7 {I+25-6} or +0.47 {I+24-10} (2004Va16), +19 {I+10-5} (p=80%) or +0.196 {I+23-12} (p=20%) (1988Be51), +0.14 {I9} or >+20 (<-20) (1980De07). 
A{-2}=-0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3}; pol.=+0.7 {I+4-3}: Other; A{-2}=-0.18 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I10} (1980De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=38.1 {I20} 
A{-2}=+0.53 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I3}: Other; A{-2}=+0.50 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I8} (1980De07). 
MR$ From 1988Be51. Others: +1.3 {I+7-4} (2004Va16), +2.5 {I6} or +0.67 {I+15-11} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100.0 {I12} 
A{-2}=+0.002 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I13}; pol.=+1.6 {I+15-6} 
MR$ Other: -2.2 {I+5-8} (p=50%) or -0.06 {I+9-10} (p=50%) (1988Be51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I4} 
TI$From I|g in 1988Be51 
MR$From 1988Be51. Other: 0.00 {I+13-3} or +2.0 {I+9-3} (2004Va16,2008Hi17) 
A{-2}=+0.186 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.002 {I17}; pol.=+4 {I+26-1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I3} 
A{-2}=-0.200 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I15}; pol.=+2.1 {I+4-3}: Other; A{-2}=-0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1980De07). 
MR$from 1988Be51. Other: 0.05 {I4} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I4} 
A{-2}=+0.420 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.036 {I21}; pol.=+2.5 {I+27-10}: Other; A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} (1980De07) 
MR$other: +0.64 {I+7-14} or +0.22 {I+8-6} (1988Be51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100.0 {I11} 
A{-2}=-0.203 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I8}; pol.=+1.9 {I+18-6}: other; A{-2}=-0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I5} (1980De07). 
MR$from 1988Be51. other: +0.06 {I3} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=69.2 {I24} 
E$The E|g of 168.78 {I5} from 2004Va16 is inconsistent with the E|g's from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
TI$The branching value is inconsistent with those from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
MR$from 1988Be51. other: +0.40 {I+7-8} or +3.1 {I+27-5} (2004Va16) 
A{-2}=-0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100.0 {I24} 
E$The E|g of 258.30 {I5} from 2004Va16 is inconsistent with the E|g's from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
TI$The branching value is inconsistent with those from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I6} 
MR$from 1988Be51 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=67.8 {I24} 
E$The E|g of 373.08 {I5} from 2004Va16 is inconsistent with the E|g's from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
TI$The branching value is inconsistent with those from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I4} 
MR$from 1988Be51 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=93 {I19} 
A{-2}=+0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I9} 
MR$from 1988Be51. Other: -0.03 {I+19-10} (2004Va16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I16} 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5}: Other; A{-2}=+0.64 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I16} (1980De07). 
M,MR other: D+Q, |d=1.2 {I5} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100.0 {I14} 
MR$2008Hi17 quotes -0.40 {I+18-15} or -11 to +11. Other: +3.02 {I18} (1988Be51) 
A{-2}=+0.184 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.000 {I16}; pol.=+0.8 {I+9-5}: other; A{-2}=+0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I8} 
MR$from 1988Be51. Other: +0.88 {I25} or +0.06 {I+23-9} (2004Va16) 
A{-2}=+0.39 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I5} (1988Be51) 
MR$D(Q) from 1988Be51. Evaluators propose E1(+M2) from the transition of (7- to 6+) decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I5} 
A{-2}=+0.332 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.048 {I22}; pol.=+0.3 {I+5-3}: other; A{-2}=+0.30 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I8} (1980De07). 
MR$from 1988Be51. Others: +0.68 {I+45-32} (2004Va16,2008Hi17), +0.50 {I+70-25} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I8} 
E$The E|g of 297.78 {I5} from 2004Va16 is inconsistent with the E|g's from 1988Be51 and (n,|g). 
A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.31 {I5}; pol.=+1.4 {I+4-3}: Other; A{-2}=-0.16 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I14} (1980De07) 
MR$from 1988Be51. Others: -3 {I+2-8} (2004Va16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=33 {I7} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=757.58. Evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=96 {I5} 
A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} 
MR$from 1988Be51. Others: +0.06 {I+7-3} (2004Va16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I5} 
A{-2}=-0.084 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I13} 
MR$from 1988Be51. Others: +0.03 {I+6-3} (2004Va16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=5.8 {I16} 
M,MR$2004Va16 gives |d=-0.3 {I4}; not clear whether Q/D admixture or O/Q; |DJ|p requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I3} 
A{-2}=-0.191 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I19}; pol.=+0.4 {I4}: other; A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I8} (1980De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=36 {I6} 
E$$ from branching in 2004Va16 one expect an 812|g in 1988Be51 and (n,|g). However it has not been seen. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=33 {I7} 
TI$from the branching of 33 one expect a 1220|g in 1988Be51 with 0.062. This is large enough to have been seen by 1988Be51. The branching of 2.4 in (n,|g) is small. The 1220|g in 2004Va16 is perhaps multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=18 {I6} 
MR$-1.6 {I4} or -0.42 {I+10-20} (1988Be51) 
M$|d and T{-1/2}(2661.43 level) suggest M1+E2; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I6} 
MR$from 1988Be51. 
M$|d and T{-1/2}(2661.43 level) suggest M1+E2; 
A{-2}=-0.71 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$2004Va16 placed this |g from 2682 level. However, the energy dose not fit from the level (3.3 keV lower). It fits well with 2679 level from (n,|g). Evaluators omitted the |g from the level and moved it to this level comparing with (n,|g) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 
A{-2}=+0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I7} 
MR$ From 1988Be51. Other: +0.93 {I+44-26} (2004Va16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=54 {I8} 
E$E|g=1369.68 {I5} from 2004Va16 is doublet. 
A{-2}=+0.00 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=14 {I6} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=564.54. Evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I20} 
E$The authors of 2004Va16 placed 2812.86 {I5} |g (doublet) from 2813.92 level. However, the energy fit is very poor. Evaluators moved the |g to this level from 2813.92 level comparing with 1988Be51 and (n,|g) data. However, the mult of E2 from 2004Va16 is conflict with D from (|g,|g') and A{-2}, A{-4} 
A{-2}=-0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I30} 
TI$Calculated after 2812|g moved to 2812 level in 2004Va16 
A{-2}=+0.10 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I2} 
MR$from 1988Be51. 
M$E1 listed by 2004Va16, but |d and T{-1/2}(2858.88 level) suggest M1+E2 
A{-2}=-0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=100 {I2} 
E$Poor fit, level-energy difference=1442.75: evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=20 {I3} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1477.68: evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=20 {I3} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=2231.53: evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$2004Va16 placed this |g from 2679 level. However, the energy dose not fit from the level (1.9 keV higher). It fits well with 2935 level comparing with (n,|g) data. Evaluators omitted the |g from the 2679 level and moved it to this level. The |g of E2 mutipole listed in Table propose J=1+ for the 2935.59 level, however, this is conflict with |g from 3-,4+ level. Evaluators omitted this multipole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=92 {I23} 
E$The E|g is inconsistent with the E|g=1551.63 {I5} in (n,|g). Evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=39.0 {I20} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=774.92: evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=33 {I7} 
M$large |d and T{-1/2}(3008 level) 
MR$ Other: +8 {I+22-3} (1988Be51) 
A{-2}=+0.22 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.27 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=77 {I14} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1806.35: evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=31 {I35} 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=2501.39: evaluators omitted the |g from least-squares fit to E|g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Branching ratio=75 {I25} 
M$large |d and T{-1/2}(3202 level) suggest M1+E2 
A{-2}=-0.17 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Intensity is weaker than that of the incoming 571.8-keV |g. It may be affected by the strong 695.0-kev |g. (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$doublet with 696.2|g 
$(414.4|g)(694.6|g+696.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.08 {I7}, R(46|')=1.05 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$doublet with 410.0|g and 412.1|g 
$(414.4|g)(666.0|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.12 {I8}, R(46|')=1.06 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(414.4|g)(694.6|g+696.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.08 {I7}, R(46|')=1.05 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(720.2|g)(414.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.90 {I7}, R(46|')=0.95 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(720.2|g)(694.6|g+696.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.94 {I6}, R(46|')=0.98 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$doublet with 694.6|g 
$(720.2|g)(694.6|g+696.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.94 {I6}, R(46|')=0.98 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(713.2|g)[208.1|g][989.3|g](414.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.10 {I9}, R(46|')=1.03 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(713.2|g)(208.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.09 {I7}, R(46|')=1.03 {I6}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(571.4|g)[696.2|g][720.2|g](414.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.11 {I8}, R(46|')=1.04 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(571.4|g)[696.2|g](720.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.93 {I6}, R(46|')=0.98 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(K)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.60 {i7}; ce(L)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.14 {i5}; ce(M)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.030 {i12}; ce(N+)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.0062 {i25} 
TI from |S(|g+ce)(to 61) 
M from |d, and T{-1/2} expected from |g|g-coin experiment in 1967Ra13 
MR from |a calculated from ratio of I(|g+ce) to I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR weighted av of -1.53 {I24} (1972Kr15), -1.61 {I39} (1974So03), and -2.55 {I20} (1985De04). Others: -0.56 {I10} (1972Kr15), -0.31 {I3} (1985De04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
$ce(K)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.427 {i7}; ce(L)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.444 {i7}; ce(M)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.1057 {i22}; ce(N+)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.0221 {i5} 
K:L:M:N=0.99 {I5}:1.0:0.248 {I24}:0.050 {I4}, L1:L2:L3=0.599 {I19}:0.144 {I8}:1.0, M1:M2+M3:M4+M5=1.0:2.29 {I14}:0.093 {I23} (1972Ka61); N+O/L=0.050 {I4} (1972Ka31) 
M from |a{-K}(exp) 
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(392.0|g)(678.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.80 {I5}, R(46|')=0.94 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(392.0|g)[678.1|g](697.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.80 {I4}, R(46|')=0.95 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(358.2|g)(491.3|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.06 {I4}, R(46|')=1.05 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(358.2|g)[491.3|g](678.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.95 {I4}, R(46|')=0.96 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(457.6|g)(392.0|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.08 {I4}, R(46|')=1.03 {I3}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(457.6|g)[392.0|g](678.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.95 {I4}, R(46|')=0.95 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(590.6|g)[952.7|g](678.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.14 {I5}, R(46|')=1.04 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(590.6|g)(952.7|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.11 {I5}, R(46|')=1.07 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(816.4|g)[457.6|g](392.0)(|q): R(22|')=0.90 {I5}, R(46|')=0.95 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(816.4|g)(457.6|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.93 {I3}, R(46|')=0.96 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(816.4|g)[457.6|g][392.0|g][678.1|g](697.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.2 {I1}, R(46|')=1.07 {I6}, R(75|')=1.00. This cascade will have |?30% contribution from 815.7 -> 590.6 -> 952.7 -> 678.1 -> 697.4 cascade also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0009 {I3} 
EKC$from {+128}Sb |b{+-} decay (9.05 h) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+12}C,F|g), |a(K)exp suggest E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$-0.19 {I10} or +4.5 {I+31-14} from 2008Hi17. Both values should have appeared in Table V according to e-mail received from the first author of 2008Hi17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentative placement in 2012Hi10, doublet 
RI$calculated from branching ratios in 2012Hi10 by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$only from 2012Hi10 
RI$calculated from branching ratios in 2012Hi10 by evaluator 
M,MR$from |g(|q) (2012Hi10) and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$only from 2012Hi10 
RI$calculated from branching ratios in 2012Hi10 by evaluator 
M,MR$from |g(|q) (2012Hi10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$only from 2012Hi10 
MR$tan{+-1}(|d)=+0.94 {I+100-103} gives |d<-0.07, all positive values are possible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
MR$tan{+-1}(|d)=-0.72 {I+38-145} gives |d<-0.35, all positive values are possible 
E$only from 2012Hi10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$only from 2012Hi10 
M,MR$from |g(|q) (2012Hi10) 
RI$calculated from branching ratios in 2012Hi10 by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$only from 2012Hi10 
MR$from |g(|q) (2012Hi10) 
RI$calculated from branching ratios in 2012Hi10 by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$only from 2012Hi10 
MR$tan{+-1}(|d)=-0.97 {I+97-94} gives |d>+2.8, all negative values are possible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
MR$tan{+-1}(|d)=+0.41 {I+148-44} gives wide range of negative and positive values, except |d=-0.04 to -3.0 region seems not permitted 
E$only from 2012Hi10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(313.6|g)(753.5|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.14 {I5}, R(46|')=1.07 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(313.6|g)(743.0|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.13 {I5}, R(46|')=1.06 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$(526.3|g)(313.6|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.88 {I6}, R(46|')=0.97 {I6}, R(75|')=1.00 
M$|g|g(|q) in 2014As01 gives D 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(717.1|g)[101.3|g][877.5|g](313.6|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.18 {I5}, R(46|')=1.06 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(717.1|g)[101.3|g][877.5|g][313.6|g][753.5|g] (743.0|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.15 {I5}, R(46|')=1.10 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$from {+129}Te IT decay. |a(K)exp and L-subshell ratios (1977So06,1972Ka61). 
E$from IT decay (33.6 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g). 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.025 {I22} or -27 {I14} 
$EG=359.20 1 in 129SB g.s. decay, 359.19 5 in (n,G) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$EG=364.21 3 in 129SB g.s. decay, 364.26 10 in (n,|g) 
RI$unweighted average from (n,|g) and {+129}Te g.s. decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average from (n,|g) and {+129}Te g.s. decay 
$EG=453.44 1 in 129SB g.s. decay, 454.33 3 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=295.26 1 in 129SB g.s. decay, 259.27 4 in (n,|g) 
RI$unweighted average from (n,|g) and {+129}Te g.s. decay 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I4} or -6.3 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$^NRM weighted average of 759.8 1 in 129SB isomer decay, 760.1 1 in (64NI,XG), 759.4 2 in (12C,FG) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in {+238}U({+12}C,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+129}Te g.s. decay. I|g=34.6 {I6} in (n,|g) is in disagreement 
$EG=330.33 4 in 129SB g.s. decay, 330.32 5 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+129}Te g.s. decay. I|g=33.6 {I24} in (n,|g) is in disagreement 
$EG=786.36 1 in 129SB g.s. decay, 786.45 7 (uncertain) in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+129}Sb decay. I|g=172 {I12} in (n,|g) is discrepant, probably due to incorrect splitting of doublet at 773.2 keV. I|g(684)/I|g(1318)=1.35 {I2} in {+129}Sb decay as compared to 1.06 {I17} in (n,|g) 
$EG=684.18 1 in 129SB g.s. decay, 684.6 3 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+129}Sb decay. I|g=159 {I20} in (n,|g) is discrepant 
$EG=1318.30 1 in 129SB g.s. decay, 1318.54 22 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)=+0.47 {I5} or +3.65 {I65} for 9/2 to 7/2; +0.10 {I4} or +0.71 {I16} for 9/2 to 9/2; +0.12 {I19} or +0.93 {I34} for 7/2 to 7/2; -0.45 to -1.73 for 7/2 to 9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|D(EG)=0.10 and 6% uncertainty in RI assumed 
$|d(Q/D)=-0.34 {I7} or +4 {I8} if J(1228)=7/2; no fit for J(1228)=9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=213 {I10} (1977So06). The ce data from 1972Ka61, 1969Ka32: ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.503 {I7}, ce(L)/(|g+ce)=0.383 {I7}, ce(M+)/(|g+ce)=0.112 {I3}; K:L:M:N+=1.29 {I4}:1:<0.26:0.053 {I4}; L1:L2:L3=0.767 {I39}:0.166 {I18}:1 (1972Ka61), M1/M23=1/1.84 {I53}, (N+O)/L=0.053 {I4}. Other: K/LM=1.06 {I5} (1968Go34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=180.34, I|g=39.3 from I|g(relative)=1200 (1991StZX) 
$E|g=180.292 {I19}, |s(elemental)=0.0203 b {I21} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=359.07, I|g=7.74 from I|g(relative)=236 (1991StZX) 
$E|g=359.07 {I9}, |s(elemental)=0.0045 b {I7} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=654.75, I|g=3.44 from I|g(relative)=105 (1991StZX) 
$E|g=654.73 {I15}, |s(elemental)=0.0203 b {I21} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=756.58, I|g=3.44 from I|g(relative)=105; placed tentatively from a 936.8 level (1991StZX) 
$E|g=756.68 {I15}, |s(elemental)=0.0042 b {I8} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2360.51, I|g=2.49 from I|g(relative)=76 (1991StZX) 
$E|g=2360.5 {I3}, |s(elemental)=0.0043 b {I10} (2007ChZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E,M$from Adopted Gammas 
TI$total transition intensity feeding the 105.5 level is 27.4 {I2}, out of which 17.3 units proceed by isomeric transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$from 1970Oh05. Value of 2.389 {I19} in 1989WaZJ seems too low which gives non-physical negative |b feeding of |?1.5% 
$EG=180.8 5 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=180.6 10, IG=3.9 10 (1970Ca23) 
$U{-2}A{-2}=+0.03 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=359.4 5, IG=6.6 6 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=358.8 4, IG=9.7 7 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.03 increased to 0.05 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.025 {I22} or -27 {I14} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.20 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=544.7 3, IG=41.7 21 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=543.8 4, IG=33.8 10 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.09 increased to 0.3 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.49 {I3} or +6.0 {I7} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=633.7 5, IG=6.4 5 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=633.5 4, IG=4.7 3 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.04 increased to 0.05 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.16 4 or +2.3 3 for J(634)=3/2; 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.58 {I5} or +4.3 {I7} for J(634)=5/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.41 {I3} 
$Possible doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=295.5 6, IG=2.4 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=295.5 10, IG=2.8 3 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.009 increased to 0.017 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I4} or -6.3 {I15} for J(760)=7/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.65 {I9} or +3.5 {I8} for J(634)=9/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.13 {I3} or -20 to +80 for J(634)=11/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.05 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=654.3 5, IG=7.0 5 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=654.3 4, IG=6.9 5 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.05 increased to 0.06 
$E2 for J(760)=7/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.26 {I3} or -2.95 {I25} for J(634)=9/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.34 {I5} or +1.35 {I11} for J(634)=11/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.19 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=268.6 8, IG=0.6 1 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=268.3 10, IG=0.4 1 (1970Ca23) 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.47 {I19} or +8.5 {I59} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.33 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=812.8 5, IG=100 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=812.6 4, IG=100 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.4 increased to 1.0 
M$U{-2}A{-2}=-0.41 {I3} consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=966.4 6, IG=17.9 11 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=966.6 4, IG=16.8 7 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.06 increased to 0.19 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.18 {I1} or -9.1 {I10} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.02 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=683.34 
RI$uncertainty increased from 0.07 to 0.12. 
$EG=683.6 3, IG=13.5 9 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=683.5 4, IG=15.0 12 (1970Ca23) 
$E2 for J(1228)=9/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.46 {I8} or +4.8 {I14} for J(1228)=7/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.36 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=737.1 10, IG=0.9 2 (1970Oh05) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.003 increased to 0.009 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.11 {I18} or +2.4 {I10} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.28 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1280.8 10, IG=1.3 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1280.8 10, IG=0.8 1 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.006 increased to 0.012 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 {I7} or -2.45 {I45} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.49 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=773.4 6, IG=6.4 5 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=773.1 10, IG=3.3 2 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.05 increased to 0.06 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.03 {I4} or +1.53 {I14} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.41 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=1317.2 10, IG=0.8 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1318.0 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.09 increased to 0.10 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.55 {I8} or +4.8 {I13} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.49 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1995StZZ. 1989WaZJ list 1.819 {I4} 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.06 {I24} or -1.4 {I79} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.11 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1418.6 11, IG=1.2 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1415.2 10, IG=1.0 1 (1970Ca23) 
$E2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.36 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1598.5 9, IG=1.2 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1599.9 10, IG=0.90 8 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.012 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.77 {I11} or +2.7 {I6} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.65 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=405.0 7, IG=3.2 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=404.8 10, IG=3.8 4 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.004 increased to 0.024 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.47 {I5} or +3.65 {I65} for 9/2 to 7/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.10 {I4} or +0.71 {I16} for 9/2 to 9/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.12 {I19} or +0.93 {I34} for 7/2 to 7/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.45 to -1.73 for 7/2 to 9/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.44 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=1083.8 7, IG=1.2 4 (1970Oh05, unplaced); EG is in disagreement if it corresponds to 1087.98 gamma from 1989WaZJ. G not reported in 1970Ca23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1654.6 10, IG=2.3 5 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1655.9 10, IG=2.0 2 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.016 increased to 0.03 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.02 {I3} or -3.65 {I40} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.29 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$EG=146.6 7, IG=0.5 1 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=145.7 10, IG=0.8 1 (1970Ca23); 0.01 uncertainty in IG seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$EG=244.7 6, IG=1.2 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=244.5 10, IG=2.2 2 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.004 increased to 0.008 
$U{-2}A{-2}=+0.35 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=499.6 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.009 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.14 to -3.2 for J(1228)=7/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.8 {I3}; no fit if J(1228)=5/2 or 9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=761.0 5, IG=8.8 6 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=760.8 4, IG=6.0 8 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.05 increased to 0.09 
M$U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I3} consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=914.6 5, IG=46.6 25 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=914.7 4, IG=43.3 9 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.17 increased to 0.5 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.105 {I15} or -15.5 {I30} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.10 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$EG=1261.3 10, IG=1.7 4 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1261.1 10, IG=2.7 3 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.016 increased to 0.019 
$U{-2}a{-2}=-0.43 {i6} consistent with E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$EG=1621.1 12, IG=0.6 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1622.0 10, IG=0.30 3 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.002 increased to 0.004 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I10} or -17 {I13} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.06 {I14}; but |D(J|p) required E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1995StZZ list 3.21 {I6} which is the value for 523.13|g in 1989WaZJ 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.34 {I7} or +4.0 {I75} for J(1228)=7/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.24 {I6}; no fit if J(1228)=9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=939.7 7, IG=1.7 4 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=939.4 10, IG=2.0 2 (1970Ca23) 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.68 to -1.11 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.45 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1208.68 
$EG=1208.5 7, IG=2.1 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1208.1 10, IG=0.6 1 (1970Ca23) 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.30 {I5} or +4.0 {I75} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.08 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1030.1 6, IG=29.3 18 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1030.4 4, IG=28.5 11 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.12 increased to 0.3 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.077 {I13} or -10.8 {I15} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.146 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=1736.5 10, IG=13.9 17 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1738.1 4, IG=12.6 11 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.06 increased to 0.15 
$U{-2}A{-2}=+0.114 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1237.4 15, IG=0.6 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1236.7 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23) 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.09 {I6} or -5.3 {I17} for J(634)=3/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.65 {I17} or -7 to +10 for J(634)=5/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.18 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1325.9 10, IG=1.2 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1326.9 10, IG=0.80 15 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.014 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.30 {I15} or +0.92 {I24} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.56 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1869.9 11, IG=0.7 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1871.8 10, IG=0.56 5 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.005 increased to 0.007 
$ |d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I6} or -2.75 {I55} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.43 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1104.3 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1104.5 10, IG=0.7 1 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.005 increased to 0.007 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.13 {I12} or +2.45 {I75} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.25 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1257.0 18, IG=0.8 4 (1970Oh05) 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.37 {I15} or -2.05 {I65} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.24 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1436.1 12, IG=0.7 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1435.7 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23) 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.03 {I8} or -4.1 {I13} for J(634)=3/2; |d(E2/M1)=-1.0 {I4} or -2.2 to +45 for J(634)=5/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.28 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1525.9 10, IG=1.0 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1526.0 10, IG=0.60 13 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.011 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 {I9} or +2.1 {I5} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.28 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=2069.6 15, IG=1.3 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=2071.6 10, IG=1.00 15 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.009 increased to 0.015 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.29 {I8} or +1.55 {I25} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.74 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=1568.7 8, IG=1.6 2 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=1570.1 10, IG=1.50 15 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.010 increased to 0.018 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 {I5} or +2.1 {I3} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.28 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$EG=2113.0 15, IG=0.8 3 (1970Oh05) 
$EG=2114.5 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23) 
RI$uncertainty of 0.004 increased to 0.009 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.17 {I5} or -9.2 {I33} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.04 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(330.4|g)(759.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.10 {I5}, R(46|')=1.06 {I3}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(330.4|g)(987.5|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.15 {I9}, R(46|')=1.07 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(914.1|g)(759.4|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.17 {I8}, R(46|')=1.08 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(914.1|g)(180.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.91 {I5}, R(46|')=0.95 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(914.1|g)(250.5.1|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.92 {I6}, R(46|')=0.89 {I8}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(914.1|g)(362.9|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.8 {I1}, R(46|')=0.92 {I6}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(914.1|g)(657.5|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.16 {I8}, R(46|')=1.05 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement from 2004Br19; this |g-ray is only defined as being located above the 7- isomer in 1998Zh09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+1.56 {I+23-19} or +0.16 {I10} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<21 {I1} or 0.73 {I2} 
$B(M1)<1.3|*10{+-2} {I1} or 4.3|*10{+-2} {I+2-1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+5.2 {I+24-13} or -0.26 {I+10-3} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=34 {I3} or 2.2 {I+3-2} 
$B(M1)=3.7|*10{+-3} {I+3-4} or 9.7|*10{+-2} {I+8-11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+6.2 {I+37-17} or -0.29 {I10} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=3.4 {I4} or 0.27 {I+4-3} 
$B(M1)=4.4|*10{+-4} {I+5-4} or 1.6|*10{+-2} {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+3.5 {I+31-6} or -0.13 {I+13-14} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=16 {I2} or 0.29 {I3} 
$B(M1)=7.7|*10{+-3} {I+8-9} or 9.8|*10{+-3} {I+10-9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+7.6 {I+65-24} or -0.29 {I7} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.5 {I5} or 0.36 {I4} 
$B(M1)=4.5|*10{+-4} {I4} or 2.5|*10{+-2} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(181.8|g)(793.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.10 {I7}, R(46|')=1.05 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(181.8|g)[793.2|g](839.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=1.09 {I7}, R(46|')=1.04 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(330.7|g)(181.2|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.89 {I8}, R(46|')=0.96 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(330.7|g)[181.2|g][793.2|g](839.2)(|q): R(22|')=0.89 {I7}, R(46|')=0.96 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference; transition not observed due to its low energy and consequential high internal conversion, but expected from |g|g-coincidence observations 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(934.5|g)[330.7|g][181.2|g][793.2|g](839.2)(|q): R(22|')=1.11 {I8}, R(46|')=1.04 {I4}, R(75|')=1.00 
$(934.5|g)(330.7|g)(|q): R(22|')=0.88 {I7}, R(46|')=0.96 {I5}, R(75|')=1.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) at E(n)=2.2 MeV. Note that authors give uncertainty of 0.00 for A{-2} and A{-4} 
$B(E2)(W.u.) taken by 2022Hi01 from {+130}Te Adopted Gammas in the ENSDF database (May 2001 update). Also B(E2)(W.u.)=14.9 {I5} (2013St24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) at E(n)=2.2 MeV. Note that authors give uncertainty of 0.00 for A{-2} 
$B(E2)(W.u.) taken by 2022Hi01 from 2020CoZY, while noting that B(E2)(W.u.)=18 {I4} (2020CoZY) is also possible depending on the sign of E2 matrix element in shell-model calculations 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) at E(n)=2.2 MeV 
$B(E2)(W.u.) taken by 2022Hi01 from {+130}Te Adopted Gammas in the ENSDF database (May 2001 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) at E(n)=2.2 MeV 
$Branching ratios from 2008Hi17 in (n,n'|g) 
MR$other: -0.19 {I+11-4} (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1)=0.0070 {I+20-28}, B(E2)(W.u.)=36 {I+17-9} for |d=+3.90 {I+10-5}; B(M1)=0.11 {I2}, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.3 {I2} for |d=-0.19 {I+11-4} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) at E(n)=2.2 MeV 
$|g(|q) at E(n)=3.3 MeV 
$Second solution from |g(|q): |d(E2/M1)=-0.26 {I7} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other: -0.16 {I11} (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1)=0.0084 {I+45-43}, B(E2)(W.u.)=23 {I+13-12} for |d=+3.9 {I15}; B(M1)=0.13 {I7}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.60 {I4} for |d=-0.16 {I11} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$-0.78 {I+85-76} for J|p(2300 level)=1+ (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1) and B(E2)(W.u.) for J|p(2300 level)=1+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LE
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$see comment for 2330.66 level for branching ratio 
MR$<1.1 from RUL(E2)=300. 
$Note: RUL=300 for B(E2)(W.u.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LE
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$Note that authors give uncertainty of 0.00 for A{-2} 
RI$467.9-keV is unresolved from the much stronger 468.3|g from the 2101, 5- level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other: -0.51 {I12} (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1)=0.000047 {I+120-47}, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.8 {I+50-18} for |d=-16 {I+25-28}; B(M1)=0.010 {I3}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.37 {I8} for |d=-0.51 {I12} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other: +0.13 {I+10-4} (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1)=0.00007 {I+15-6}, B(E2)(W.u.)=7.2 {I+84-72} for |d=-16 {I+17-9}; B(M1)=0.019 {I+5-4}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.12 {I3} for |d=+0.13 {I+10-4} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Negative A{-2} in |g(|q) forbids 4+ for 2575 level 
MR$other: -2.5 {I+12-7} (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1)=0.0011 {I3}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.0049 {I+13-12} for |d=-0.19 {+11-13} B(M1)=0.00016 {I+10-11}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.12 {I+12-6} for |d=-2.5 {+12-7} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other: +0.16 {I+35-20} (2022Hi01) 
$B(M1)=0.0051 {I+51-27}, B(E2)(W.u.)=5.5 {I+32-48} for |d=+1.7 {I+8-14}; B(M1)=0.019 {I3}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.19 {I+3-19} for |d=+0.16 {I+35-20} (2022Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$Note that RUL(E2)=300 for B(E2)(W.u.)|<2800 
$|d(E2/M1), B(M1) and B(E2)(W.u.) for J|p(2748 level)=(5)- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=10.0 in author' Table I seems a misprint 
$|d(E2/M1), B(M1) and B(E2)(W.u.) for J|p(2748 level)=(5)- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M4)
decay_comment:
M$E3,M4 from K/L=2.3 {I4} (1957Al35). |DJ=4, |D|p=yes from adopted levels 
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp; according to B.Fogelberg's e-mail, preferably, mult=E2 as B(E2)(W.u.)=3.5 {I10} and B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0017 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp; according to B.Fogelberg's e-mail, preferably, mult=E3 as B(E3)(W.u.)=0.0152 {I20} and B(M2)(W.u.)=2.0|*10{+-6} {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=837.71 {I6}. This |g is listed in Table 4 of 2003To08 as depopulating 2497 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from the Table 4, I|g=0.16; this |g listed in the Table 3 as depopulating the 1781 level. In 1980Ho29 I|g=3.3 {I28}, unplaced transition in the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit: level-energy difference=2547.69 {I7} 
E$from a coincidence measurement. One more |g of 2546.6 {I5} I|g=0.33 {I14} from a single-detector measurement entered in the Table 3 (2003To08) is less confident (explained by the first author (I. Tomandl) in e-mail reply, December 20, 04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not listed in Table 3 of 2003To08. E|g from recoil-corrected value of 4438.1 in Table 4; |DE is assigned by evaluators on the analogy of |g-rays in this energy range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not listed in Table 3 of 2003To08. E|g from recoil-corrected value of 4454.2 in Table 4; |DE is assigned by evaluators on the analogy of |g-rays in this energy range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=3592.19 {I11}; one more |g of 3590.2 {I10}, I|g=0.03 {I2}, entered in the Table 3, is not placed in the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not listed in Table 3 of 2003To08. E|g from recoil-corrected value of 4188.3 in Table 4; |DE is assigned by evaluators on the analogy of |g-rays in this energy range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$not listed in Table 3 of 2003To08. E|g from recoil-corrected value of 4214.4 in Table 4; |DE is assigned by evaluators on the analogy of |g-rays in this energy range 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from recoil-corrected value of 5048.1 in Table 4; uncertainty assigned based on those for similar intensity |g-rays. This |g not listed in Table 3 of 2003To08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$E3 in Adopted dataset for {+131}Te in ENSDF database seems incorrect. |a(K)exp=0.08 {I2} for 360.3 {I2} |g listed in ENSDF agrees with M2 as well. E3 was preferred over M2 in ENSDF based on unusually low value of B(M2)(W.u.)=2.0|*10{+-6} {I3} as compared to B(E3)(W.u.)=0.0152 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$From the stopped peak produced in {+132}Sb |b{+-} decay. The uncertainty has been assigned by the compiler 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$ B(M1)(to 974,2+)=5.4 {I35} from Coulomb excitation analysis in 2011Da21 and I|g(1665)/I|g(691)=0.2 {I1}/20 {I3} from 2005Hu08: Phys Rev C 71, 044311; >0.23 from Coulomb excitation analysis and I|g(691)/I|g(1665)>4.2 (2011Da21) 
$ B(E2)(W.u.)(to 974,2+)=0-20 from Coulomb excitation analysis in 2011Da21 and I|g(1665)/I|g(691)=0.2 {I1}/20 {I3} from 2005Hu08: Phys Rev C 71, 044311 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ B(E2)(W.u.)=0.5 {I1} from Coulomb excitation analysis in 2011Da21 and I|g(1665)/I|g(691)=0.2 {I1}/20 {I3} from 2005Hu08: Phys Rev C 71, 044311 
E$ |g not seen in 2011Da21, from |g spectra, I|g(691)/I|g(1665)>4.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2016Bi02 associate this |g ray with 1042.1 keV {I1} |g from a 2967 level reported by 2005Hu08 (Phys. Rev. C71, 044311) in the |b{+-} decay of (8-) isomer of {+132}Sb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2016Bi02 associate this |g ray with 293.62 keV {I7} |g from a 3261 level reported by 2005Hu08 (Phys. Rev. C71, 044311) in the |b{+-} decay of (8-) isomer of {+132}Sb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$2016Bi02 note that this |g ray was reported by 2015Le03 in |g-ray detection from {+235}U,{+241}Pu(n,F) reaction at PF1B cold-neutron facility at ILL-Grenoble 
M$see comment for 624.3|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$(624|g)(900|g)(|q) studied by 2016Bi02 in TIFR-BARC experiment. Results suggested that Q(|b{+-})Q cascade is the most favorable, however, D-D cascade could not be completely ruled out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+132}Te Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Feb 2005 update) 
$Branching ratio of a 798|g reported by 2001Ge07 (Phys. Rev. C63, 054315) is unknown, with implied mult=[E3]. This branching is considered negligible in deducing B(E2)(W.u.) for the 22|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Bo26 (E|g=334.274 keV 35) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.3 {I1} (1974Fu13); K/L=4.5 {I6} (1957Al35) and 4.3 {I6} (1968Be64). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$125.5 in 2002Hw03 
RI$from Erratum. Value of 78.3 in 2002Hw03 was I(|g+ce), with E2 assignment for the 125.1|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=8.8 {I11}, |a(exp)=21 {I3} 
M$from |a(K)exp=8.8 {I11} (absolute K| x ray and |g-ray counting) and |a(exp)=21 {I3} (intensity balance) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weak |g in spectrum figure 3 of 2002Ra46 and 2004Ra27, probably corresponds to 1837|g in 'adopted levels, gammas' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$325.0 (2001Lu16) 
$(325|g)(1180|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.097 {I6}; A{-4}=+0.007 {I9} (2010Li03) consistent with E2-E2 cascade and 15/2- |) 11/2- |) 7/2- spin sequence 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g=18 {I6} 
$%I|g: Absolute intensity per decay measured by simultaneous |b and |g counting (1997Ho15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$Unresolved doublet; overlaps with the 424.7|g from {+135}Te which is populated in |b{+-}n decay. I|g from coincidence data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.099 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.015 {I30}. Other: A{-2}=+0.128 {I34}, A{-4}=+0.034 {I52}, for gate on 443.2|g (2016Ur01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$(356.5+534.8|g+436.4|g)(271|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} consistent with stretched quadrupole - stretched dipole cascade 
M$see comment for 436.4|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$(436.4|g)(356.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} consistent with stretched quadrupole - stretched quadrupole cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$(534.8|g+436.4|g)(356|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} consistent with stretched quadrupole - stretched quadrupole cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M |a(exp)(91|g)=13 deduced from I(|g+ce) balance about 322 level, compatible with |a(M2 theory) 
HF(M2,91|g)=8.4 W.u. 
For comparable HF(M2) in the region, see 1973Co32 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR large and negative A{-2} value is due to contamination from another dipole transition (1985QuZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ 328.2 in table 1 and figure 2 of 2003Mo36 is a misprint as confirmed in an e-mail reply from C.B. Moon on Dec 16, 2003 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI from calculated relative intensity balance between populating and depopulating transitions (1997To03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI not reported in {+108}Pd({+15}N,4n|g). Value given from I(462|g)/I(713|g) in {+109}Ag({+13}C,3n|g) (1982Da17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M M1 from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4} 
R(DCO)=0.42 {I14}; A{-2}=-0.22 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.02 {I17} 
Other: I|g=7.5 {I5}, and A{-2}=0.42 {I20}, A{-4}=0.22 {I28} (1984QuZX). Note those values given for doublet (1984QuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4}. M=E1+M2 is ruled out by |a(80.7|g)>1.1 from intensity balance at the x+151.0 level (evaluators) 
R(DCO)=0.71 {I8}; from A{-2}=-0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M (M1) from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4} 
R(DCO)=0.68 {I9}; A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E a doublet together with another transition from 5- state (1997Ka03) 
M D from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4} 
R(DCO)=0.64 {I9} for the doublet; A{-2}=-0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M M1 from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4} 
R(DCO)=0.65 {I8}; A{-2}=-0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} (1984QuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M M1 from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4} 
R(DCO)=0.62 {I8} for a doublet (113.1|g+111.9|g). A{-2}=-0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E other: 382.0 {I3} for a doublet (1984QuZX) 
M D from R(DCO), and D+Q from A{-2}, A{-4} 
R(DCO)=0.38 {I9}; A{-2}=-0.30 {I9}, A{-4}=0.11 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI other: E|g=633.7 {I3}, I|g=12.8 {I3} (1984QuZX). But this |g is doublet in 1984QuZX. 
R(DCO)=1.03 {I15}; A{-2}=-0.21 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.27 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.05 {I16} 
E,RI other: E|g=714.1 {I3}, I|g=6.7 {I2} (1984QuZX); but this |g is doublet in 1984QuZX 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$deduced by compilers from level-energy difference. E|g=591.8 in table and figure of 2012MoZZ does not fit the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Figure in supplemental material (2018Mo16), not listed in authors' Table in supplemental material 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Figure in supplemental meterial (2018Mo16), not listed in authors' Table in supplemental material 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Fig. 2 and Table I in supplemental material (2018Mo16). E|g=551.1 in authors' level-scheme Figure in supplemental material is a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Figure in supplemental material (2018Mo16), 875.7 in Table in supplemental material 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from level-scheme Figure in supplemental material (2018Mo16), 594.3 in Table in supplemental material 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR $average of -0.06 {I2} (1992Li01), +0.02 {I4} (1982Ha46), 0.00 {I5} (1982Ga21); other; <0.2 from |a(L)exp (1972Mu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$average from {+121}Sb({+3}He,3n|g), {+118}Sn({+6}Li,3n|g) and {+114}Cd({+11}B,4n|g). The value is disagreement with that from {+121}Xe |e+|b{++} decay. 
M $assumed E1+M2 from J|p's of initial and final levels 
MR $from |g(|q) (1992Li01), others: +0.32 {I+13-17} or -1.9 {I+5-7} (1982Ha46) -0.20<|d<-2.0 (1982Ga21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M $assumed M1+E2 from J|p's of initial and final levels 
MR $average of +0.11 {I3} (1992Li01), +0.23 {I4} (1982Ha46), +0.27 {I6} (1982Ga21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M $E1 is possible from RUL and parity change of initial and final states 
MR $from |g(|q) (1982Ha46) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M $assumed M1+E2 from J|p's of initial and final levels 
MR $average of +0.15 {I1} (1992Li01), +0.20 {I4} (1982Ha46), +0.18 {I5} (1982Ga21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M $assumed M1+E2 from J|p's of initial and final levels 
MR $from average of +0.26 {I5} (1992Li01), +0.15 {I5} (1982Ga21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$assumed M1+E2 from J|p's of initial and final levels 
MR$from average of +0.20 {I5} (1982Ha46), +0.21 {I7} (1982Ga21), +0.26 {I7} (1992Li01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$The relative intensity of multiply placed gammas was estimated from |g|g-coincidence spectra (1972Mu03). However, the value is too small compared with the in-beam studies. 
M $from adopted gammas 
MR$from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$The relative intensity of multiply placed gammas was estimated from |g|g-coincidence spectra (1972Mu03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M $DCO(C)=0.52 {I12}, DCO(D)=0.63 {I11} 
$The order of 336.8|g and 317.4|g was not resolved in this study (1993Pa16). So the 35/2+ level could have energy 5337.7 or 5318.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M $DCO(C)=0.44 {I11}, DCO(D)=0.61 {I11} 
$The order of 336.8|g and 317.4|g was not resolved in this study (1993Pa16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$335 given in table 2 (1992Li01) is a misprint. E|g=355 in level scheme. 
M $DCO=0.38 {I20} in {+96}Zr({+30}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M $A{-2}=-0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} 
MR$calculated from |g(|q) without taking into account an additional attenuation due to the isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.1 {i2} (1981Ng04), 0.97 {i15} (1973Lo10) 
MR from weighted average of |a(K)exp=1.02 {i12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$this |g was shown as decaying from a separate level in decay scheme (2004MoZT), but evaluator assumes as decaying from the same level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 138.1 {I2} from {+123}Xe |e decay, 138.2 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 138.2 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 138.4 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 138.38 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) and (|a,2n|g); magnetic and electric nature from ce data in {+123}Xe |e decay. |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 148.9 {I2} from {+123}Xe |e decay and 149.07 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+123}Xe |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from energies and intensities of conversion electrons in {+123}Xe |e decay 
M$M1,E2 from ce data in {+123}Xe |e decay, |DJ=2 required by the decay scheme, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 178.1 {I2} from {+123}Xe |e decay and 178.00 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from {+123}Xe |e decay 
M,MR$from ce data in {+123}Xe |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 330.2 {I2} from {+123}Xe |e decay and 330.1 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from {+123}Xe |e decay 
M$M1,E2 from ce data in {+123}Xe |e decay; |DJ=1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 474.3 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 474.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 474.3 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 474.11 {I11} from (|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), M1 from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 413.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 413.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 414.0 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 413.98 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I10} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) and ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M,MR$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), M1 from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 552.1 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 552.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 552.4 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 552.32 {I12} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 88 {I8} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 57 {I6} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 64 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 502.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 503.1 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 502.90 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 135 {I12} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 112 {I11} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), 86 {I4} from (|a,2n|g), and 74 {I8} from ({+7}Li,6n|g). All intensities are normalized to I(641.27|g)=100 
M,MR$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), M1 from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 641.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 641.3 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 641.26 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 100 {I12} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 100 {I11} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 100 {I11} from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 118.8 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 119.0 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 118.64 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: <2.6 from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.6 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 196.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 196.8 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 5.1 {I13} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 3.6 {I7} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g); magnetic nature from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 532.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 532.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 532.6 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 532.55 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 32 {I3} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 30 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 23 {I4} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g); D also from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g); magnetic nature from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 670.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 670.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 671.1 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 671.02 {I6} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+14}N,|a3n|g). Others: 100 {I24} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) and 100 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 241.8 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 241.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 241.69 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 43 {I7} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) is discrepant. This |g is not seen in ({+6}Li,3n|g), probably very weak compared to 655.8|g seen in that study. 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g); magnetic nature from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 655.7 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 655.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 655.9 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 655.73 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I14} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), and |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 272.3 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 272.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 272.6 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 272.46 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 100 {I6} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 100 {I10} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) (|DJ=1), angular intensity ratio and |g(pol) in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 391.1 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 391.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 391.5 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 391.14 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I4} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 28 {I7} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 19 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g); electric nature from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 330.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 331.2 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 331.16 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g); magnetic and electric nature from ce data in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 409.2 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 409.0 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 409 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: <13 from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 528.0 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 527.8 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 528 {I1} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: <19 from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 605.8 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 605.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 606.2 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 606.00 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I13} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 361.9 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 362.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 362.3 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 362.1 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 16.0 {I20} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 11.6 {I12} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 13.3 {I24} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 5.6 {I3} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) is discrepant 
M$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g); magnetic and electric nature from ce data in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 603.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 603.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 604.1 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 603.90 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g). Others: 100 {I8} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 100 {I11} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 100 {I13} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g); electric nature required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 343.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 343.2 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 343.10 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Others: 100 {I7} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 100 {I11} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 100 {I11} from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M,MR$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), M1+E2 with |d|?=+0.2 from ce data in (|a,2n|g). |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 674.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 674.3 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 674.2 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 32 {I7} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 38 {I5} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), 31 {I6} from (|a,2n|g), and 25 {I4} from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) (|DJ=2), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 356.8 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 357.3 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: <75 from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 765.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 766.5 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I25} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 509.5 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 509.2 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), 509.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 510 {I1} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 509.57 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 420.5 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 420.3 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 420.4 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 7.4 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 8.3 {I17} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 782.4 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 782.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 782.5 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 782.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g). Others: 100 {I14} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 100 {I14} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g), |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 629.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 630.0 {I3} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 629.8 from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 374.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 375.0 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 374.81 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,6n|g). Others: 100 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 100 {I11} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 100 {I13} from (|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$mixing ratio from |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g), M1+E2 with |d|?=+0.2 from ce data in (|a,2n|g). |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 717.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 718.1 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 717.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 45 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 25.5 {I21} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), 35 {I13} from (|a,2n|g), and 37 {I4} from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) (|DJ=2) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 711.2 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 711.2 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 711.3 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 711.0 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), supported by |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) and (|a,2n|g); M1,E2 from ce data in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 294.4 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 294.5 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 294.7 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 4.3 {I20} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 5.8 {I12} from (|a,2n|g). Other: <3.6 in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 714.9 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 715.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 715.4 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 715.20 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g). Others: 100 {I7} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 100 {I17} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g), |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 413.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 413.6 {I2} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 413.7 from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,6n|g). Others: 100 {I17} from (|a,2n|g), 100 {I22} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g), D (|DJ=1) from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 700.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 700.6 {I2} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 700.4 from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 52 {I4} from ({+7}Li,6n|g), 56 {I11} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 75 {I17} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$(M1,E2) from ce and |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g), Q (|DJ=2) from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 586.6 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 586.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), 586.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 586.8 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 586.71 {I11} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce and |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g), |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 391.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 391.5 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 391.70 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$from ({+14}N,|a3n|g). Others: 100 {I45} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) and 100 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 766.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 766.6 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 766.5 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 44 {I6} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 70 {I20} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 13.2 {I13} from ({+6}Li,3n|g) seems discrepant 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), supported by |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) for a doublet and |g(|q) in ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 345.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 345.66 {I20} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 345.8 from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I8} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 67 {I13} from (|a,2n|g), and 57 {I5} from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M$D (|DJ=1) from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), supported by |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 671.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 671.2 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 671.6 {I2} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 671.4 from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
RI$from ({+7}Li,6n|g). Others: 100 {I15} form ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 100 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) (|DJ=2) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g); M1,E2 from ce data in (|a,2n|g) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 595.3 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 596.0 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g). Other: <14.3 from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 889.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 889.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 889.6 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g). Other: 100 {I14} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), supported by |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 418.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 419.0 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+14}N,|a3n|g). Other: 100 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 810.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 810.5 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 67 {I11} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and 50 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 574.1 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 574.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), 574.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 574.1 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 574.08 {I20} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce an |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g), |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 856.8 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 856.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), and 856.3 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 297.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 298.2 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 298.06 {I20} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 298.2 from ({+7}Li,6n|g) 
M$(M1,E2) from ce and |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g), D (|DJ=1) from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,6n|g) only, probably corresponds to 310.17|g from 2001 level seen in (|a,2n|g). This |g is not seen in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 245.4 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 245.5 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$other: <5.3 from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 840.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 840.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 840.6 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 840.6 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I8} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), supported by |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,6n|g) only, probably corresponds to 399.5|g from 2482 level seen in (|a,2n|g). This |g is not seen in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 372.0 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 371.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 60 {I3} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 63 {I13} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 617.4 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 617.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I13} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) and angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 240.3 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 240.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$other: 25 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 612.3 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and 612.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 898.3 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 898.5 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), 898.3 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g), 898.3 {I3} from ({+6}Li,3n|g), and 898.5 {I3} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and ({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 632.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 814.1 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 814.5 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 814.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 674.5 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 674.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 674.5 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 590.8 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 590.9 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 590.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 1044.0 {I10} placed from a level at 6863 in ({+14}N,|a3n|g), which is replaced by the placement here adopted from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 831.6 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 832.1 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 831.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 353.1 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 352.7 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 352.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 93 {I5} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 110 {I5} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 80 {I30} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g). All intensities are normalized to I(1184.9|g)=100 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1184.7 {I2} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 1185.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 1184.8 {I5} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g). Others: 100 {I8} from ({+18}O,p4n|g) and 100 {I30} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from angular intensity ratio in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), and |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weak |g from ({+18}O,p4n|g) only. This |g could be the same as 519.5|g (Mult=M1) placed from 8389, (49/2+) level in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) in a 692.2|g-519.5|g cascade, while the cascade in ({+18}O,p4n|g) is 519.5|g-245.8|g-691.5|g to a level at 6092. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 608.3 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 605.6 {I5} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 606.0 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 
RI,M$from ({+18}O,p4n|g), with Mult from |g|g(DCO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 754.3 {I4} from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), 755.1 {I5} from ({+18}O,p4n|g), and 755.0 {I10} from ({+14}N,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,M$from ({+18}O,p4n|g) only, with Mult from |g|g(DCO). This |g could be the same as 519.5|g (Mult=Q) placed from 7697, (47/2+) level in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g) in a 692.2|g-519.5|g cascade, while the cascade in ({+18}O,p4n|g) is 519.5|g-245.8|g-691.5|g to a level at 6092. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,M$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), with Mult (|DJ=2) from angular intensity ratio. See also 519.5|g from 7550 level, reported in ({+18}O,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,M$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), with Mult (|DJ=2) from angular intensity ratio. Other: E|g=990.8 {I5}, Mult=D from |g|g(ADO) in ({+14}N,|a3n|g); E|g=990.8 {I5}, Mult=D from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g) but placed from a 8570 level based on a 991|g-801|g cascade to 6777 level. Note that the order of the cascade is reversed in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), resulting in the level at 7766, instead of a level at 7579 in ({+18}O,p4n|g), with the former being adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,M$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), with Mult (|DJ=1) from angular intensity ratio and |g(pol). See also 691.5|g from 6784 level, reported in ({+18}O,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,M$from ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), with Mult (|DJ=1) from angular intensity ratio and |g(pol). Other: E|g=802.1 {I5} with Mult=D from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,p4n|g), placed from a level at 7579 based on a 991|g-801|g cascade to 677 level. The order of the cascade is reversed in ({+48}Ca,p4n|g), resulting in the level at 7766, instead of a level at 7579 in ({+18}O,p4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.26 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.041 {I7} (1971St08) 
MR$from Adopted Gammas. Other: 0.30 {I+15-30} from ce data in 1971St08 
CC$Calculated with |d=-0.15 {I5} from {+120}Sn({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 148.7 (1968Gf01) 
RI$%I|g=48.0 {I10} from direct measurement in 1974Jo16 
M$|a(K)exp=0.32 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.080 {I10}, |a(M)exp=0.021 {I5} (1971St08), |a(M)exp=0.0175 {I15} (1981Bo25), |a(K)exp=0.294, |a(L+M)(exp)=0.096 (1968Gf01) 
$I(ceK)=100.0 {I34}, I(ceM)=5.46 {I30} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from energies of conversion electrons (1971St08) 
RI$deduced from I(ceL) and I(ceM) and assumption that mult=E2 (1971St08). 
M$L/M=3.5 {I15} gives M1 or E2 (1971St08). |DJ=2 from the decay scheme, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=178.0, I|g=32.2 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.145 {I20}, |a(L)=0.017 {I3}, |a(M)=0.004 {I1} (1971St08), |a(L)exp=0.0175 {I19}, |a(M)exp=0.0038 {I7} (1981Bo25), |a(K)exp=0.137, |a(L+M)exp=0.03 (1968Gf01) 
MR$Deduced by the evaluator from ce data using BrIccMixing, adopted in Adopted Gammas. 
$I(ceL)=1.70 {I5}, I(ceM)=0.365 {I22} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=330.3, I|g=17.2 (1968Gf01) 
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.029 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.004 {I1} (1971St08), |a(K)exp=0.027 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.0032 {I6}, |a(M)exp=0.00070 {I12} (1981Bo25), |a(K)exp=0.032, |a(L+M)exp=0.003 (1968Gf01); |DJ=(1) from level scheme 
$I(ceK)=1.50 {I5}, I(ceL)=0.174 {I10}, I(ceM)=0.039 {I6} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=679.6, I|g=0.31 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0061 {I23} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0079 {I29} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=718.0, I|g=0.43 (1968Gf01) 
M$D,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I35} (1981Bo25); (M1) required from level scheme 
$I(ceK)=0.005 {I4} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=870.3, I|g=0.60 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I19} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0073 {I32} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=898.9, I|g=5.16 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0026 {I4},|a(L)exp=0.00045 {I18} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0403 {I23}, I(ceL)=0.0072 {I22} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=782.6, I|g=1.30 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I7} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0082 {I14} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=934.5, I|g=0.82 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I18} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0064 {I16} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=963.1, I|g=1.28 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0019 {I5} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0066 {I14} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=1112.0, I|g=2.84 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00112{I17} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0113 {I11} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=1092.6, I|g=5.23 (1968Gf01) 
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.00122 {I21} (1981Bo25); M1 from level scheme 
$I(ceK)=0.0217 {I27} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=977.8, I|g=0.78 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I5} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0037 {I7} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=1060.7, I|g=2.88 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I5} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0099 {I20} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=474.9, I|g=0.22 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0114 {I30} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0075 {I16} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: E|g=909.0, I|g=0.30 (1968Gf01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0037 {I15} (1981Bo25) 
$I(ceK)=0.0021 {I8} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D,Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I16} 
M$not given in 1982Sh20, proposed by the evaluator from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 138.37 {I5} from 1977Ha36 and 138.4 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 244 {I12} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 182 {I9} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 210 {I11} from 1993Go04 
M$from Adopted Gammas. D+Q from A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1977Ha36); A{-2}=-0.28 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} (1993Go04); M1 with |a(K)exp=0.26 {I1} is assumed by 1977Ha36 for normalization of their measured conversion coefficients. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ha36 
RI$weighted average of 7.0 {I14} (22 MeV) and 4.0 {I8} (27 MeV) from 1977Ha36 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I5} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ha36 
RI$unweighted average of 18 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV) and 7.0 {I14} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) 
$A{-2}=-0.05 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I11} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ha36 
RI$unweighted average of 10.0 {I20} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV) and 5.0 {I10} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ha36 
RI$unweighted average of 30 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV) and 8.0 {I16} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 474.22 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 474.0 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 102 {I5} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 66 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 75 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.57 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.59 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 414.00 {I5} from 1977Ha36 and 413.9 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 110 {I6} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 83 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 89 {I5} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.53 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1993Go04), for a doublet with 413.6|g from the 2016 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 552.43 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 552.2 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 62 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 50.0 {I25} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 68 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0058 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.32 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 503.00 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 502.8 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 64 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 59 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 61 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I10}, A{-2}=-0.58 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.53 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 641.31 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 641.2 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 70 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 63 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 79 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 118.63 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 119 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 1993Go04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.6 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 197.0 {I3} from 1993Go04 
RI$from 1993Go04. Other: <3 from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 532.69 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 532.4 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 24 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 25 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I6} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 671.05 {I5} from 1977Ha36 and 670.9 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 117 {I6} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 90 {I5} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 125 {I6} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1993Go04), for a doublet with 671.6|g from 2362 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 241.69 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 241.7 {I3} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 6.0 {I12} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 5.0 {I10} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 7.0 {I14} from 1993Go04 
$A{-2}=-0.26 {I6} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 655.76 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 655.7 {I1} from from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 75 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 64 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 82 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0034 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 272.47 {I5} from 1977Ha36 and 272.4 {I1} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.009 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 391.17 {I20} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 391.1 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 17 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 17 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 25 {I4} from 1993Go04 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7} (1993Go04), for a doublet with 391.7|g from 2082 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 331.17 {I5} from 1977Ha36 and 331.1 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 95 {I5} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 98 {I5} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 113 {I6} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 606.10 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 605.9 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 45 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 32 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 40 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=+0.35 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I10} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I8} (1993Go04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 362.2 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 362.1 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 12.0 {I23} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 11.0 {I22} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 10.0 {I20} from 1993Go04 
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.025 {I8}, M1 favored by A{-2}=-0.64 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I12} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 604.09 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 603.7 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 72 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 73 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 104 {I5} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=+0.36 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.35 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I7} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 343.11 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 343.1 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 47 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 47 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 53 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.024 {I2}, A{-2}=+0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 674.3 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 674.2 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 14 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 15 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 17 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=+0.23 {I2} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.32 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I16} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,M$Doublet with 766.5|g from 2082 level. Evidence from coincidence. Mult assignment was done with sum of the doublet peaks (1993Go04). This placement is not reported by 1977Ha36, from which it is instead placed from a tentative level at E=766.5 that is not adopted. 
RI$from 1993Go04. Other: 16 {I3} for a 766.5|g placed from a tentative level at E=766.5 in 1977Ha36 (27 MeV); 23 for the double from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV). 
M$A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I8} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.32 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I13}, for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 509.56 {I5} from 1977Ha36 and 509.6 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 94 {I5} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 105 {I5} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0075 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I11} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 782.5 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 782.4 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 30 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 34 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 45 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I6} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 630.04 {I20} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 630.1 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 16 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 19 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 291.55 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 291.4 {I3} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 3.0 {I6} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 5.0 {I10} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 4.0 {I8} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.046 {I9}, A{-2}=-0.43 {I5} (1977Ha36) 
M$not given in 1977Ha36; deduced by the evaluator from ce and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 689.0 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 689.1 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 13.0 {I25} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 11.0 {I22} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 10.0 {I20} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 {I20}, A{-2}=-0.92 {I9} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 374.82 {I20} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 374.8 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 25 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 32 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 37 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 717.9 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 717.9 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 6.0 {I12} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 10.0 {I20} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 18 {I3} from 1993Go04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 711.0 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 711.0 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 20 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 19 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 28 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I15}, E2 preferred by A{-2}=+0.40 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I9} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 208.94 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 209.0 {I3} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 3.0 {I6} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 4.0 {I8} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 2.0 {I4} from 1993Go04 
$A{-2}=-0.58 {I4} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 715.20 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 715.2 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 37 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 54 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 66 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I7}, A{-2}=+0.35 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.40 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 310.24 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 310.1 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 12.0 {I23} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 8.0 {I16} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 13.0 {I25} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I4}, A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I7} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 413.7 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 413.6 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 11.0 {I22} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 14 {I3} from 1993Go04. Other: 110 {I6} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV) for a doublet with 414.0 from 552 level. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, for 413.6|g +414.0|g doublet (1977Ha36) 
M$not given in 1977Ha36; deduced by the evaluator from ce and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 700.7 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 700.6 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 7.0 {I14} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 11.0 {I22} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 11.0 {I22} from 1993Go04 
M$(M1,E2) from |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I20}, A{-2}=+0.18 {I9} (1977Ha36); (E2) required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 586.82 {I10} from 1977Ha36 and 586.6 {I1} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 37 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 55 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 75 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0058 {I12}, A{-2}=+0.39 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.37 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 391.80 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 391.6 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 8.0 {I16} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 12.0 {I23} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 14 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} for 391.8|g + 391.17|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E,M$Evidence from coincidence. Mult assignment was done with sum of the doublet peaks (1977Ha36, 1993Go04). 
RI$unweighted average of 5 {I1} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 9.0 {I18} from 1993Go04. Other: 23 {I4} for the doublet 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I8} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.32 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I13} (1993Go04), for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 812.5 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 812.7 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 13.0 {I25} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 11.0 {I22} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=-0.87 {I22} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 338.4 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 338.6 {I3} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 4.0 {I8} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 4.0 {I8} from 1993Go04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 345.62 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 345.7 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 9.0 {I18} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 10.0 {I20} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 11.0 {I22} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I10} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 671.5 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 671.7 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 1993Go04. Other: 117 {I6} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV) for a doublet with 671.0|g from 671 level 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1993Go04), for the doublet 
$Evidence from delayed coincidence (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 889.6 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 889.6 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 7.0 {I14} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 11.0 {I22} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 17 {I3} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=+0.52 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.40 {I10} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 574.25 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 573.9 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$unweighted average of 14 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 27 {I4} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 39 {I4} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0061 {I15}, A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I11} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I8} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 298.12 {I20} from 1977Ha36 and 298.0 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 8.0 {I16} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV), 13.0 {I25} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 13.0 {I25} from 1993Go04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.032 {I6}, A{-2}=+0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I10} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 840.6 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 840.6 {I2} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 19 {I3} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV), and 24 {I4} from 1993Go04. Other: 5 {I1} from 1977Ha36 (22 MeV) seems discrepant 
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.29 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I13} (1993Go04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 907.8 {I3} from 1977Ha36 and 908.2 {I3} from 1993Go04 
RI$weighted average of 6.0 {I12} from 1977Ha36 (27 MeV) and 6.0 {I12} from 1993Go04 
M$A{-2}=-1.1 {I2} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M$According to e-mail replies of April 5 and 7, 2012 from one of the authors (A. K. Singh), this |g ray was not observed directly, its existence was inferred from |g|g coin data. Also the assignment of E1 multipolarity shown in table I of 2012Si04 is an error in the paper; its multipolarity remains unknown 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR From L-subshell ratio of ce in {+125}Xe |e decay and |g(|q) in {+123}Sb(|a,2n|g),{+122}Sn({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.48 {I4} (1980Bo32); K/L=7.1 {I7}, L1:L2:L3=100:8.8 {I9}:4.6 {I8} (1967Ge10) 
MR Negative sign is from A{-2} and A{-4} values in {+123}Sb(|a,2n|g),{+122}Sn({+6}Li,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.12 {I1}, K:L:M=100 {I8}:14.2 {I11}:33.6 {I28} (1981Bo25); |a(K)exp=0.125 {I8} (1980Bo32); K/L=6.9 {I2}, L1:L2:L3=100:12.3 {I4}:8.2 {I2} (1967Ge10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
K:L:M=100:18.4 {I15}:4.6 {I4} (1981Bo25); K/L=5.3 {I3}, L1:L2:L3=100:39.3 {I12}:36.0 {I12} (1967Ge10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
K:L:M=100 {I8}:12.2 {I11}:2.6 {I4} (1981Bo25); |a(K)exp=0.012 {I1} (1980Bo32), |a(K)exp=0.0121 {I8} (1967Ge10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E From GTOL. 1980Bo32 report 635.824 {I18} as a doublet. 
K:L=100:23 {I9} (1981Bo25); |a(K)exp<0.020 (1980Bo32); |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I7} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E From GTOL. 1980Bo32 report 635.824 {I18} as a doublet. 
K:L:M=100:23 {I9} (1981Bo25); |a(K)exp<0.020 (1980Bo32); |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I7} (1981Bo25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M From {+125}Xe |e decay 
MR Absolute value from {+125}Xe |e decay. A{-2} and A{-4} values suggest negative sign. 
|a(K)exp=0.48 {I4} (normalization; 1977Ha36) 
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.24 {I10} (1982Sh20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0072 {I8} 
$A{-2}=-0.52 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.43 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0091 {I6} 
$A{-2}=-0.57 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.54 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=-0.62 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0053 {I10} 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I10} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.16 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I8} 
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.23 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I3} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I6} 
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.37 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.04 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I9}, (1982Sh20), A{-2}=-0.11 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0053 {I12} (for 380.56|g + 380.6|g doublet) 
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} for 380.56+380.6 (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.18 {I4} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0043 {I10} 
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.21 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I11} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.011 {I1} 
$A{-2}=-0.61 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.63 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=-0.70 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0047 {I8} 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.38 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.025 {I2} 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I8} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=-0.05 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I8} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.19 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.18 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.023 {I2} 
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0053 {I8} 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I10} 
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1982Sh20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I8} 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.10 {I1} 
$A{-2}=-0.46 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I11} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.59 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.20 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0075 {I8} 
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.031 {I3} 
$A{-2}=-0.61 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I8} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=-0.63 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I12} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp by evaluators 
|a(K)exp=0.057 {I5} 
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I13} (1977Ha36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.45 {I9} (1977Ha36), A{-2}=+0.30 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7} (1982Sh20), A{-2}=+0.21 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I13} (2001Sh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+126}Te(p,n|g) 
M$|d(M3/E2)= +0.24 {I3} is reported in ({+7}Li,5n|g). From RUL (M3)<10, one expects |d<1.2x10{+-4}. The evaluators adopt mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|d(M3/E2)= +0.23 {I1} is reported in ({+7}Li,5n|g). From RUL (M3)<10, one expects |d<1.2x10{+-4}. The evaluators adopt mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1983Bu11 propose M1 for the 86 |g to 245 (4)+ level from intensity balance in |g|g spectrum. However, it is inconsistent with the negative parity of the 331 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=3.7 {I6} from ({+7}Li,5n|g) is normalized using the branching ratios with I|g's of the 149 keV |g from ({+7}Li,5n|g) and (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance in |g|g spectrum, A{-2}=-0.016 {I11} (1983Bu11). An M2 admixture of the transition probaility rate is upper limit of 0.01% from the measured lifetime.(1983Bu11) 
A{-2}=-0.016 {I11} (1983Bu11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.004 {I6} (1983Bu11) 
M$|a(K)exp (1997DaZY) support M1,E2. But 122.20 keV transition of E2 is doublet with 122.70 keV E1 transition. |a(K)exp is consistent with the multis required by the level scheme E2 for 122.20 |g and E1 for 122.70 |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1983Bu11 propose M1 for the 86 |g to 245 (4)+ level from intensity balance in |g|g spectrum. However, it is inconsistent with the negative parity of the 331 level. 
M$From intensity balance in |g|g spectrum (1983Bu11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
M$|d(M3/E2)= +0.24 {I3} is reported in (20013Ka50). From RUL (M3)<10, one expects |d<1.2x10{+-4}. The evaluators adopt mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
M$|d(M3/E2)= +0.23 {I1} is reported in (20013Ka50). From RUL (M3)<10, one expects |d<1.2x10{+-4}. The evaluators adopt mult=E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$The authors of 2012MoZZ place this |g on 2131 level. The placement is inconsistent with the decay pattern by 2012Zh30 and 2013Ka50. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The authors of 2012Zh30 place this |g from 4886 level. The placement is inconsistent with the decay pattern by 2012MoZZ and 2013Ka50. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.17 {I3} 
E$The authors of 2012Zh30 place this |g from 4886 level. The placement is inconsistent with the decay pattern by 2012MoZZ and 2013Ka50. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR weighted av of |d values quoted by 1977Kr13. Other: +0.33 {I9} from (360|g)(57|g)(|q) for A{-2}=0.41 {I5} and |d(57|g)=-0.086 {I5} (1977Ku17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(K)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.669 {i6}; ce(L)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.0951 {i18}; ce(M)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.0193 {i4}; ce(N+)/(I{-|g}+I{-ce})=0.00432 {i9} 
From L1:L2:L3=1.0:0.118 {I4}:0.068 {I4} (1967Ge10) 
TI from I(|g+ce)(145|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ In e-mail reply of April 26, 2012, Y.H. Zhang informed that that E|g=684.3 from 1235 level should instead be 683.7 from 4641.6 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$moved from 1248-keV level on the basis of a least-squares fit of |g's by evaluators. 
RI$I/I(1110|g)=(49 {I20})/(100 {I30}) (1997Al29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$moved from 1258-keV level on the basis of a least-squares fit of |g's by evaluators. 
RI$I/I(815|g)=(80 {I30})/(100 {I30}) (1997Al29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$I/I(1427|g)=(45 {I18})/(100 {I39}) (1997Al29). 
E$moved from 1631-keV level on the basis of a least-squares fit of |g's by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g|g suggests placement from 232.6, but absence of transition in (n,|g) suggests I|g<8 for this placement. Then, one can deduce I|g(52.4|g from 137 level)=99 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(80.924|g)/I(147.104|g)=0.11 {I1} in (n,|g), but I(80.87|g)/I(147.0|g)=0.26 {I5} here. Thus, I(80.87|g, 232 level-151 level)=6.6, leaving I(80.87|g)=8.7 to be placed to other level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placed from 416 level by author; however, placement is from 554 level in (n,|g). I|g(416|g)/I|g(420|g) consistent with (n,|g) for placement from 554 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from L1/L2/L3 ratio in {+129}Te decay (1965Be26) and |d=-0.045 {I14} (from ratio of lines in Mossbauer spectrum (1970De37). See 1970Va06 for possible penetration effects for 27.81|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 27.78 {I5} (ce data in 1965Be26) 
MR$magnitude from L1/L2/L3=1/0.145 {I12}/0.119 {I13} (1965Be26) and using BrIccMixing code; sign from |d=-0.045 {I14} (from ratio of lines in Mossbauer spectrum (1970De37). Others: |a(exp)=4.5 {I5} (1964De10), 4.8 {I4} (1969Sa22) are in agreement with theoretical value deduced from |d=-0.053 {I3}. Possible penetration effects are discussed by 1970Va06; these are expected to be very small in the case of 27.81-keV transition in {+119}I. Other |d=0.016 {I11} from (460|g)(28|g)(|q) (1965Gu07) 
RI$no data given in 1976Ma35. Deduced from the ratio I(27|g)/I(209|g+ 251|g+278|g+281|g)=12.6 {i12} in 1969Di01 by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$251|g(temp,|q): U{-2}F{-2}=+0.225 {I29} (1973Sa14) 
MR$weighted average of |d=+0.53 {I+16-12} (1974De15,|g|g(|q)) and +0.60 {I+21-13} (as quoted by 1977Kr13 from |g(temp,|q) data of 1973Si14). Others: +3.5 {I+20-11} (|g|g(|q),1974De15) is discarded since it is inconsistent with low-temperature orientation data; +1.2 {I+38-8} deduced by 1977Kr13 from |g(|q) in (|a,|a') data of 1973Re08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of |d=-0.22 {I5} (1974De15) and -0.16 {I4} (1973Sa14). Other: -0.66 {I+28-13} (1965Gu07, as quoted by 1977Kr13) is in disagreement 
$209|g(temp,|q): U{-2}F{-2}=+0.507 {I46} (1973Sa14); 1977Kr13 give |d=-0.16 {I4} from this work 
$(209|g)(251|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.234 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.011 {I22} (1974De15) 
$(209|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.059 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.018 {I18} (1974De15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(temp,|q) data of 1973Sa14. 1977Kr11 evaluation recommended -0.12 {I4} based on this value and five other |d values deduced from |g|g(|q) data and one from |g(|q) in (|a,|a'), all of which are in disagreement with each other. Evaluators prefer the measured value from 1973Sa14 since only one |g is involved. Value of |d=-0.30 {I8} from 460|g(|q) in (|a,|a') does not seem reliable due to almost isotropic distribution, whereas in |g(temp,|q) data of 1973Sa14, strong anisotropy is observed 
$460|g(temp,|q): U{-2}F{-2}=-0.260 {I6} (1973Sa14) 
$(460|g)(28|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.033 {I11} (1974Ro32); |d=-0.03 {I+26-17} deduced by 1977Kr13; value agrees with |d from 1973Sa14 
$(460|g)(28|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.0148 {I29}, A{-4}=-0.0068 {I43} (1969Sa22); |d=+0.20 {I8} deduced by 1977Kr13 
$(460|g)(28|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.056 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.029 {I35} (1969Ma33, 1969Ma47); |d=+1.8 {I+00-12} deduced by 1977Kr13 
$(460|g)(28|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.049 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.023 {I10} (1965ArZY); |d=-0.6 {I+9-6} deduced by 1977Kr13 
$(460|g)(28|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.160 {I33}, A{-4}=+0.022 {I60} (1965Gu07); 
$(460|g)(28|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.000 {I13} (1964Ka09); |d=+0.40 {I+20-18} deduced by 1977Kr13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ from 1977Kr13 based on |d=-0.08 {I3} or +2.09 {I14} (|g|g(|q), 1974De15). Other |d=-0.01 {I4} (1965ArZY), -0.42 {I3} (1965Gu07) as quoted by 1977Kr13 
$(281|g)(251|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.238 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.014 {I26} (1974De15) 
$(281|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.048 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I23} (1974De15) 
$(281|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.039 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I8} (1965Gu07) 
$(281|g)(278|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.070 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.032 {I9} (1965ArZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I(730|g) and I(242|g)/I(730|g) in 33.6 d decay. 
RI$|DI{-|g} estimated by evaluators in 33.6 d decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$(343|g)(460|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I8} (1974De15); |d=+1.0 {I8} for 3/2 to 5/2 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average (by 1977Kr13) of |d=+0.10 {I26} (1973Sa14), -0.02 {I6} and +0.06 {I8} (1974De15) 
$624|g(temp,|q): U{-2}F{-2}=-0.4 {I2} (1973Sa14) 
$(624|g)(209|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.27 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I9} (1974De15) 
$(624|g)(460|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.151 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I12} (1974De15) 
$(624|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.290 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I36} (1974De15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other: +0.15 {I10} quoted by 1977Kr13 from (1084|g)(28|g)(|q) in 1965ArZY 
$ A{-2}=-0.019 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.048 {I18} (1965ArZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ce(L)/(|g+ce)=0.663. 
MR$magnitude from L1/L2/L3=1/0.145 {I12}/0.119 {I13} (1965Be26) and using BrIccMixing code; sign from |d=-0.045 {I14} (from ratio of lines in Mossbauer spectrum (1970De37) 
E$from level energy difference. 
TI$total I|g+ce feeding the 27.8-keV level 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from L1:L2:L3=54 {I6}:6.9 {I7}:100 {I7}, M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5)=12.3 {I13}:1.6 {I2}:24 {I3}:0.57 {I7}, N1:(N2+N3):O=3.1 {I4}:5.1 {I6}:0.79 {I8} (1984RoZO) 
E$from 1984RoZO. Other: 48.2 {I3} (1966BeZZ) from ce spectra, 55 (1967Ke11) from proportional counter spectrum. In (n,|g), E|g=39.9542 {I21} (1989Sa11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$I|g=0.691 % {I7} in {+131}Te |b{+-} decay (25 min) and I|g=0.00 % {I8} in {+131}Te |b{+-} decay (33.25 h) (1975Ja03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q); (M1+E2) probable from large |d 
MR from |g(|q) in {+131}Te |b{+-} decay (1975Lh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$taken from 30h-decay data by evaluators 
RI$sum of intensities of transition from 1149 and 1444 levels is 0.72 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI 1.0 {I7} is the total intensity of this |g transition seen from both the 1974 and the 2001 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$if |d(Q/D)(563|g)=0.6 fixed then |d(Q/D)(692|g)=+0.49 {I+27-8} for J(3605)=27/2 and J(3042)=25/2. |d(Q/D)(563|g)=+0.99 {I+35-26} if J(3605)=29/2 and J(3042)=27/2 and mult(O/Q)(692|g)=0 fixed 
$ (563|g)(692|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.26 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(O/Q)(702|g)=0 fixed then |d(Q/D)(563|g)=+0.58 {I+30-15} if J(4308)=31/2 and J(3605)=27/2. |d(O/Q)(702|g)=0 fixed then |d(Q/D)(563|g)=+0.57 {I+30-15} if J(4308)=33/2 and J(3605)=29/2 
$ For J=31/2-,33/2- |m=M2, |d=0.0, fixed 
$ (702|g)(563|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$ ICE(K)=1026 57, ICE(L1)=124 6, ICE(L2)=9.7 6, ICE(L3)=2.4 4, ICE(|SL)=135 4 (1966Fr02) 
|d(E2/M1): <0.02 from |g|g(|q) and ce data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ ICE(K)=13.9 5, ICE(L1)=1.8 2, ICE(L2)=0.7 2, ICE(L3)=0.6 2, ICE(|SL)=2.9 3 (1966Fr02); L1, L2 AND L3 MAY CONTAIN CONTAMINANTS 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ ICE(K)=13.6 6, ICE(L1)=1.4 4, ICE(L2)<0.6, ICE(L3)<0.4, ICE(|SL)=2.9 3 (1966Fr02) 
$Ordering of 116-112 cascade firmly established by 1981Yo02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 228.327 {I3} (curved-crystal spectrometer,1979Bo26) 
$(228|g)(50|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.061 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.011 {I7} (1969Si06); perturbation coefficient assumed as 1 
$(228|g)(50|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.031 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I13} (1981Yo02); perturbation coefficient=0.44 {I16}, 0.41 {I9} (1981Yo02) 
$ ICE(K)=100 4, ICE(L1)=11.4 12, ICE(L2)=4.6 8, ICE(L3)=4.6 10, ICE(|SL)=20 1 (1966Fr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$(228.16|g)(49.72|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.042 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I9} (2017Al45). These values for 1+ |) 3+ |) 4+ |g cascade with E2 for 228.16|g and M1 for 49.7|g can be compared with theoretical values A{-2}=-0.071 and A{-4}=0 listed in 1971Ta32 (Nucl. Data Tables 9, 1). Compiler's note: it is possible that the uncertainties in A{-2} and A{-4} are underestimated by 2017Al45, in consideration of large error bars in data points in authors' Fig. 20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 647.1 {I3} ({+176}Yb({+136}Xe,X|g)) and 648 {I1} ({+198}Pt({+136}Xe,X|g)) 
M$|g|g(|q) in {+176}Yb({+136}Xe,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from K/L=3.5 {I4} (1968Be64) and K/L |? 4 (1970BeZT) 
E$others: 74.1 {I3} ({+176}Yb({+136}Xe,X|g)) and 73 {I1} ({+133}I IT (9 s)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$others: 168.7 {I3} ({+176}Yb({+136}Xe,X|g)) and 169 {I1} ({+198}Pt({+136}Xe,X|g)) 
M$from |g|g(|q) in {+176}Yb({+136}Xe,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference 
TI$7 {I1} in 1984Wa04 
RI$from I(|g+ce)=7.1 and by assuming mult.=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$I(|g)=5.3 {I4} was measured for the doublet, I(|g+ce)=38 {I3} from the intensity balance at the 1816-keV level. If mult.=M1, I|g=3.3 {I4}, then I|g=2.0 {I4} leaves for |g-ray from 2556.32-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from a text of 1984Wa04; E=261.616 in the table 1; E|g=261.56 {I3} measured by bent-crystal spectrometer (1979Bo26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
B(M4)(W.u.)<225; from RUL<30 one expects I|g|<0.06 
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(exp)=1.22 {I6} in {+136}Te |b{+-} decay. Other: |a(K)exp=3.2 {I8} in {+248}Cm SF decay, however, theory gives |a(K)=0.96 and 1.8 for M1 and E2 multipolarities. 
CC$experimental value from {+136}Te |b{+-} decay. 


