# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0156 {I10}; |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0055 {I21} (1986Pa18) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.37; A{-4}=+0.002 (1986Pa18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$from I(|g+ce)(5.1|g)/I(|g+ce)(586.5|g)=(41 {I5})/(59 {I5}) and I(|g+ce)(586.5 |g)=39.6 {I4} deduced from authors' (1986Pa18) values of B(E3), |d, |a, and T{-1/2}=10.0 |ms {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M2)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.047 {I7}; |a(L)exp=0.0213 {I27}; |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp=6.05 {I100} (1986Pa18) 
MR from E3+(5 {I+}- 3%)M2 
CC E3 |a(theory)'s mult. By 0.975 {I10} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
CC |a(exp)=4.63 {I60} deduced from the intensity balance (1986Pa18) 
MR from |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.82 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI pure E2 transition assumed (1986Pa18) 
CC |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=4.0 {I8}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp=1 \.30 {I+80-30} (1986Pa18); |a(exp)=8.8 {I20} deduced from the intensity balance (1986Pa16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I6} (1986Pa18); |a(L)exp=0.00093 {I9}, |a(M)exp=0.0004 {I1} (1987Va09), A{-2}=0.16 {I4} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E 1143.4 {I2} keV from 1984Va11 and 1984Va19. 
M K/L=5.95 {I21} (1990Tr01), K/L=5.91 from calculation (1990Tr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M doublet structure. |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I3} (1987Va09). 
B(E2; 307|g)/B(E2; 1450|g)=377 (1984Va11,1984Va19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.29 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.068 {I9}, |a(M)exp=0.012 {I3} (1987Va09). 
The conversion coefficient of the 401|g shows the presence of a strong E0 component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
CC E3 |a(theory)'s mult. By 0.975 {I10} (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.024 {I3} (1987Va09), |a(K)exp=0.017 {I3} (1986Va03), A{-2}=0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI from sum of |e decay relative to 100 for 1049|g (1987Va09). 
M |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2} (1987Va09), |a(L)exp=0.0032 {I6} (1987Va09). 
MR from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp (evaluators). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from sum of |e decay relative to 100 for 1049|g (1987Va09). 
M From |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2} (1987Va09). |a=0.01189 for E2, |a=0.03876 for M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.039 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.015 {I3} (1986Pa18); |a(L)exp=0.017 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.0058 {I9} (1987Va09); A{-2}=0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}(1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from |e decay (308 s+240 s). 
|a(K)exp=0.011 {I2} (1987Va09). 
M from |a(K)exp and the lack of a competitive transition to other levels (an enhanced stretched E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M from |a(L)exp=1.2 {I1}, |a(M)exp=0.28 {I3} (1987Va09), |a(L)exp=0.950 {I75}, |a(L3)exp=0.391 {I55} (1986Pa18); A{-2}=0.11 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0194 {I15}, |a(L)exp=0.004 {I1} (1987Va09), A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5}; R(DCO)=1.52 {I16} (1986Va03). 
I(|g+ce)=87.5 {I17} from 1986Pa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
CC from 1989Su12. Other: 200.6 from 1986Pa16. 
E from conversion electron measurement (1989Su12). Others: 47.9 (1986Pa18), 50.7 (1986Va03), 49.0 {I5} (1986Pa16), 50.0 {I3} (2002Si20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)<0.025, A{-2}=-0.16 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I3}, R(DCO)=0.9 {I2} (1986Va03). 
$B(E1)=4.20|*' 10{+-8} 22 (2005Dr11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M doublet structure. |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I3} (1987Va09). 
CC |a=0.418 for M1, |a=0.109 for E2. 
E,RI from |e decay (240 s) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E seen in delayed coincidence with 48|g transition (1989Su12). 
M from |a(exp)=0.005 {I1}, A{-2}=0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5}, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI total intensity of a complex peak (1986Va03). 3.1 {I2} (1995Mo01). 
M 1986Va03 suggests (E2+M1) from |a(exp)=0.022 {I7}, A{-2}=0.22 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.012 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}, R(DCO)=2.21 {I9} (1986Va03); DCO=0.60 {I7}, R(pol)=+0.038 {I4}, pol=+0.20 {I4} (2002Si20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.014 {I2}, A{-2}=0.31 {I7},A{-4}=-0.03 {I8}, R(DCO)=1.06 {I12} (1986Va03); DCO=1.00 (2002Si20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.018 {I3}, R(DCO)=1.1 {I1} (1986Va03); DCO=1.00, R(pol)=+0.091 {I7}, pol=+0.59 {I10} (2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
|d=1.5 {I+20-5} or |d=-3.0 +1.0-|@ (1986Va03). 
M 1986Va03 suggests M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.05 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I4}, R(DCO)=0.83 {I8} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=-0.4 {I+3-40} (1986Va03). 
M 1986Va03 suggests M1+E2 from |a(exp)=0.057 {I15}, A{-2}=-0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=0.3 {I2}, R(DCO)=0.85 {I17} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|d=0.3 {I+1-5} from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp (1986Va03). 
M 1986Va03 suggests M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.48 {I15}, |a(L)exp=0.087 {I17}, A{-2}=0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=0.10 {I6}, R(DCO)=0.71 {I15} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.014 {I3}, A{-2}=0.28 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I10}, R(DCO)=0.9 {I1} (1986Va03); DCO=1.02 {i13} (2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.006 {I2}, A{-2}=0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2}, R(DCO)=1.1 {I1} (1986Va03); DCO=1.02 {i13} (2002Si20) 
RI deduced from the coincidence data, about 67% of the total intensity of the doublet (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.009 {I3}, A{-2}=0.26 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I8} R(DCO)=1.0 {I2} (1986Va03); DCO=0.94 {i14} (2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 2005Wi21. Uncertainties are estimated by evaluator. 
M$From the J|p values of known levels (2005Wi21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$K/L=5.91 for calculation (1990TrZZ). 
TI from intensities balance, I(|g+ce)=2.0 {I3} (1987Va09). 
M from comparison of |g and ce spectra. 
E 1143.4 {I2} keV from 1984Va11 and 1984Va19. 
TI I(|g+ce)(out)|<I(|g+ce)(in) at 1142.9 level, intensity balance is consistent with uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Placed in {+196}Bi low spin |e decay also. I|g deduced from intensity balance and branching ratios at 1739-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI I|g=2.2 {I8} was divided 
M from |a(K)exp and the lack of a competitive transition to other levels (an enhanced stretched E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.062 {I9},|a(L)exp=0.018 {I4} 
M$From |a(K)exp 
MR$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp. 
CC$|a(K)exp+|a(L)exp=0.080 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI I(1143|g)/I(1049|g)=10|*10{+-3} (1987Pe13,1986PeZV). 
M K/L=5.95 {I21} from exp., 5.91 from calculation (1990Tr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ce measurement (1989Su12). 49.0 {I5} from 1986Pa16. E|g=50.7 keV, there is some structure in the single spectrum (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp<0.025 exclude M1, DCO=0.9 {I2} (1986Va03) 
M A{-2}=-0.14 {I6} from R(t) function of 498|g (1987Pe13,1986PeZV, 1985PeZU); A{-2}=-0.09 {I6}, A{-4}=0.07 {I8} from |g(|q) (1986Va03). 
RI I|g=5% of 1049|g (1986PeZV). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0087 {I14} (1986Pa18); R(DCO)=0.99 {I6}, A{-2}=0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1986Va03) 
I(|g+ce)=95.4 {I25} from 1986Pa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.53 {I15}, (L1+L2)/L3=2.0 {I4} (1986Pa18). |a(exp) from the intensity balance. 
I(|g+ce)=95.5 from 1986Pa18. 
B(E1)(W.u.)=5.4|*10{+-6} from T{-1/2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.017 {I3} (1986Va03,1986Pa18), A{-2}=0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1986Va03). 
I(|g+ce)=5.4 {I10} from 1986Pa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.0385 {I35}, |a(L)exp=0.0153 {I30} (1986Pa18); A{-2}=0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}(1986Va03). 
I(|g+ce)=95.8 {I20} from 1986Pa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(L)exp=0.950 {I75}, |a(L3)exp=0.391 {I55} (1986Pa18); A{-2}=0.11 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1986Va03). 
B(E2)(W.u.)=1.20 from T{-1/2}. 
I(|g+ce)=91.0 {I22} from 1986Pa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 421.5 {I1} (1986Va03) 
DCO=0.61 {I11}, R(pol)=-0.062 {I20}, pol=-0.32 {I11} 
Other: A{-2}=-0.17 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2}. R(DCO)=1.58 {I22} |a(exp) |< 0.03 (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5}, R(DCO)=1.52 {I16} (1986Va03). |a(K)exp=0.0194 {I15} (1986Pa18). Other: A{-2}=-0.13 {I3} (1977Ro15). 
I(|g+ce)=87.5 {I17} from 1986Pa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From 2005Dr11. 
$B(E1)=4.20|*10{+-8} 22 (2005Dr11) 
M from |a(exp)<0.025, A{-2}=-0.16 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I3}, R(DCO)=0.9 {I2} (1986Va03). 
I(|g+ce)=6.0 {I10} from 1986Pa18. 
E$497.7 {I2} (1986Va03) 
RI$5.7 {I7} (1986Va03), 31 {I3} (2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$From 2005Dr11. 
$B(E1)=1.13|*10{+-8} 7 (2005Dr11) 
A member of a triplet. 548|g coincide with 547|g, not with 497.7|g (1986Va03). 
E 547.4 from 1983Va06. 
RI$39 {I5} (2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E seen in delayed coincidence with 48|g transition (1989Su12). 
M from |a(exp)=0.005 {I1}, A{-2}=0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5}, R(DCO)=0.62 {I8} (1986Va03); DCO=1.00, R(pol)=+0.064 {I6}, pol=+0.53 {I7} (2002Si20). 
E$ 958.7 {I2}(2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.38 {I7} 
RI total intensity of a complex peak (1986Va03). 3.1 {I2} (1995Mo01). 
M 1986Va03 suggests (E2+M1) from |a(exp)=0.022 {I7}, A{-2}=0.22 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.012 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}, R(DCO)=2.21 {I9} (1986Va03); DCO=0.60 {I7}, R(pol)=+0.038 {I4}, pol=+0.20 {I4} (2002Si20). 
E$467.61 {I9} (1986Va03) 
RI$16.9 {I6} (1986Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$564.7 {I1} (1986Va03) 
RI$7.2 {I6} (1986Va03) 
M from |a(exp)=0.014 {I2}, A{-2}=0.31 {I7},A{-4}=-0.03 {I8}, R(DCO)=1.06 {I12} (1986Va03); DCO=1.00 (2002Si20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$679.7 {I3} (1986Va03) 
RI$6.0 {I6} (1986Va03) 
M from |a(exp)=0.018 {I3}, R(DCO)=1.1 {I1} (1986Va03); DCO=1.00, R(pol)=+0.091 {I7}, pol=+0.59 {I10} (2002Si20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.63 {I6} 
E$ 357.9 {I1} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 6.2 {I2} (1986Va03) 
|d=1.5 {I+20-5} or |d=-3.0 +1.0-|@ (1986Va03). 
M 1986Va03 suggests M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.05 {I1}, A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I4}, R(DCO)=0.83 {I8} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.50 {I7} 
E$ 525.9 {I3} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 2.2 {I4} (1986Va03) 
|d=-0.4 {I+3-40} (1986Va03). 
M 1986Va03 suggests M1+E2 from |a(exp)=0.057 {I15}, A{-2}=-0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=0.3 {I2}, R(DCO)=0.85 {I17} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.37 {I6} 
E$ 197.0 {I4} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 1.6 {I3} (1986Va03) 
M 1986Va03 suggests (E2) from R(DCO)=1.1 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.75 {I9} 
E$ 244.31 {I10} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 3.8 {I3} (1986Va03) 
|d=0.3 {I+1-5} (1986Va03). 
M 1986Va03 suggests M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.48 {I15}, |a(L)exp=0.087 {I17}, A{-2}=0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=0.10 {I6}, R(DCO)=0.71 {I15} (1986Va03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.014 {I3}, A{-2}=0.28 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I10}, R(DCO)=0.9 {I1} (1986Va03); DCO=1.02 {i13} (2002Si20) 
E$630.4 {I3} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 3.0 {I3} (1986Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.006 {I2}, A{-2}=0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2}, R(DCO)=1.1 {I1} (1986Va03); DCO=1.02 {i13} (2002Si20) 
E$745.2 {I2} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 3.3 {I6} (1986Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.009 {I3}, A{-2}=0.26 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I8} R(DCO)=1.0 {I2} (1986Va03); DCO=0.94 {i14} (2002Si20) 
E$ 529.1 {I3} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 3.5 {I3} (1986Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=1.00 {I14} 
M 1986Va03 suggests E1 from A{-2}=(-0.2), A{-4}=(0.0) (1986Va03). 
E$ 745.2 {I2} (1986Va03) 
RI$ 2.0 {I5} (1986Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$for 309.1+310.2; but 310.2 is stated as weak by 2002Si20 
E$ 309.1 (1996Ba53) 
RI$ 3.1 {I2} (1995Mo01) 
DCO=0.55 {I8} for 309.1+310.2 (weak component) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 2005Wi21. Uncertainties are estimated by evaluator. 
RI$From 2005Wi21. 
M$From the J|p values of known levels (2005Wi21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.37 {I17} (1993Mo19); POL=+0.3 {I1} (2001Ro20) 
E$468.5 {I2} (1993Mo19), 469.5 (1993Da04), 469.7 (1995Va32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$0.41 {I6} (1993Mo19) 
R(DCO)=1.25 {I25} (1993Mo19) 
E$584.3 {I2} (1993Mo19), 583.4 (1991Wa14), 584.4 (1993Da04), 584.5 (1995Va32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.29 {I35} (1993Mo19) 
E$620.2 {I2} (1993Mo19), 619.1 (1993Da05), 619.6 (1991Wa14), 620.7 (1995Va32) 
RI$0.36 {I8} (1993Mo19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
KC=0.01250, LC=0.00207, CC=0.01526 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.00462, LC=0.00087, CC=0.00579 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.00489 {I70}, |a(L1+L2)exp=0.00114 {I30} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E other: 85.0 (1979Ra04) 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a. From I(ce(M1))/I(ce(K) 234|g)=0.37 {I9} one obtains I|g=28 {I7} 
M from L2/L3/M1/N1|?32/|?8/100/32 (1962Ju05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
E other: 234.0 {I5} (1957An53) 
M from L1+L2/L3=1.5, K/L>0.3 (1957An53) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
CC M4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M based on ce-ratio data; see {+197}Pb IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
KC= 0.0787, LC=0.01323, CC=0.0963 IF MULT=M1; 
KC=0.01837, LC=0.00546, CC=0.0256 IF MULT=E2 
|a(K)exp=0.0408 {I50}, |a(L1+L2)exp=0.00847 {I110} 
MR - from {+198}Hg({+3}He,4n|g) (1985St16) 
|g(|q); A{-2}=-0.181 {I41}, A{-4}=+0.073 {I94} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
KC= 0.0362, LC=0.01828, CC=0.0605 IF MULT=E3; 
KC= 0.1578, LC= 0.0322, CC=0.2006 IF MULT=M2 
|a(K)exp=0.078 {I8}, K/L=2.96 {I10}, L1+L2/L3=20 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from 4.4 {I17}, if I(|g+ce)(80.9|g)=I(|g+ce)(88.2|g) assumed 
I|g(80.9|g)/I|g(88.2|g)=2.2 {I9} from |g(607|g) coin (1978Ri01,1979Al24) 
|a(L1+L2)exp=2.32 {I20}, |a(M1+M2)exp=0.54 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(L1+L2)exp=4.59 {I30}, |a(L3)exp=3.74 {I32}, |a(M1+M2)exp=1.21 {I50}, |a(M3)exp=1.02 {I5}, |a(exp)=10.8 (1986Pa16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$E2(+M1) or E1(+M2) from |a(K)exp; R(DCO) compatible with |DJ=1 d. Electric d from linear polarization 
R(DCO)=0.65 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR from -1.43|<|d|<-0.57 (1985St16) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I11} (1981He07); A{-2}=-0.633 {I10} (1985St16). There is a serious discrepancy in A{-2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1986Ho03) 
|a(K)exp: 0.0055 {I10} (1972Is01), 0.0048 {I4} (1986Ho03), 0.0045 {I3} (1985Pa22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} (1986Ho03) 
|a(K)exp: 0.0165 {I13} (1986Ho03), 0.017 {I3} (1985Pa22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1986Ho03) 
|a(K)exp=0.063 {I6} (1985Pa22), |a(L)exp=0.011 {I3} (1972Is01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI I(370.5|g)/I(1063.5|g)=2.9 {I5}/100 (1989Ho06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I20} (1989Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI I(473.5|g)/I(1063.5|g)=2.2 {I2}/100 (1989Ho06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=0 (1989Ho06) 
May Be wrong placement in Fig. 5 (1989Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7} (1986Ho03) 
|a(L)exp=2.8 {I4} (1972Is01); |a(K)exp=0.059 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=0.012 {I4} (1985Pa22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI I(367.2|g)/I(1063.5|g)=3.9 {I5}/100 (1989Ho06) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1989Ho06) 
Note incorrect placement in Fig. 5 (1989Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M From conversion mainly in L2- and L3-subshell (1973Pa04) 
|a(K)exp=1.8 {I10} from I(K x ray)/I|g (1978Al16), |a(L)exp=6.73 {I290} (1985Pa22), |a(exp)=10.2 (1989Su12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q). Authors rule out E1+M2 on the basis of |d|>0.15 and nonobservation of any delayed component. 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.3 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.5 {I4} (1989Ho06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} (1986Ho03). 
|a(K)exp: 0.0080 {I14} (1986Ho03), 0.0081 {I12} (1985Pa22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From level-energy difference in 2001Go06, |D\ (E|g)=0.5 keV estimated by evaluator. Other: 48.2 {I5} in 1989Su12. 
M,CC$From 1989Su12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.055 {I32} inconsistent with negative parity of 1799.9+x level as suggested by mult of 294.0|g and 462.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
DCO=1.04 {I19}. 
EKC$mixed with transitions from {+199}Tl and {+200}Hg 
TI$other: 16.8 {I5} (1988Pa12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 56.6 {I3} (1989Su12,1992Ba13). The value 56.6 was not accepted by 1993Ba01 
$(L1+L2)/L3=1.2 {I4} (1988Pa12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.74 {I24}. 
M$DCO ratio compatible with mixed |DJ=0 or |DJ=1 transition; M1+E2 inferred from intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 87.8 5 (1989Su12) 
$(L1+L2)/L3=1.12 {I10}, L/M=4.1 {I3} (1988Pa12) 
CC$ LC+MC+; the K-shell binding energy=88.0 KEV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I6} 
E$placement from 'adopted gammas'. |g assigned to a 25/2+ level at 2749 by 1981He07 and 1988Ro08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} 
E$placement from 'adopted gammas', consistent with the |g|g coin evidence by 1988Ro08 that this |g feeds the 2505 level through unobserved low energy transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0051 {I3} and K/L(exp)=5.0 {I4} (1970Ha14) and |a(L)exp=0.00095 {I27} (1972Kr08) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min); |a(K)exp=0.0057 {I10} in {+203}Tl(p,4n|g); |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I9} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g); |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I15} in (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0238 {I16} and K/L(exp)=2.94 {I23} (1970Ha14), and |a(K)exp=0.0266 {I13} (1973Pa04); |a(K)exp=0.028 {I6} (1972Kr08) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min); |a(K)exp=0.0247 {I25} and |a(L)exp=0.0093 {I14} in {+203}Tl(p,4n|g); |a(K)exp=0.025 {I3} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g); |a(K)exp=0.034 {I5} in (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.39 {I8} and K/L(exp)=4.5 {I13} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.6 {I3} (1973Pa04) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) 
MR$From |a(K)exp in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) (1970Ha14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.015; |a(L)exp<0.0022 (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} (1973Pa04) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min); |a(K)exp=0.023 {I4} in (HI,xn|g); |a(K)exp=0.012 {I2} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.108 {I8} and K/L(exp)=1.27 {I6} (1970Ha14); K/L=1.28 {I15} (1973Pa04); |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2} (1972Kr08) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min); |a(K)exp=0.11 {I1}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.077 {I10} and |a(L3)exp=0.030 {I5} in (HI,xn|g); |a(K)exp=0.107 {I14} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From ce(L) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) (1973Pa04) 
M$(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)/|a(L3)exp=1.2 {I3} in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) (1973Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=7.7 {I3} and K/L(exp)=5.0 {I5} (1973Pa04); A{-2}=0.19 {I9} and A{-4}=0.06 {I13} in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) (1987Fa15) consistent with J to J transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.27 {I26} (1970Ha14) and |a(K)exp=1.3 {I5} and K/L>1.5 (1973Pa04) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I12} K/L(exp)=5.9 {I18} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.35 {I10} (1973Pa04) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I14} in {+198}Hg(|a,2n|g) (1978Mc03); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) (1987Fa15); |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I17} in (HI,xn|g) (1988Pa12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.33 {I7} (1970Ha14), |a(K)exp=0.28 {I10} (1973Pa04) and |a(K)exp=0.36 {I6} (1972Kr08) in {+200}Bi |e decay (36.4 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Average of 45.9 keV {I7} and 45.2 keV {I5}, determined from |g-ce coincidence data in 1988Pa12 and 1989Su12, respectively [(HI,xn|g)] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0066 {I9} (1988Pa12), DCO=1.00 {I14} (1994Ba43) in (HI,xn|g); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) (1987Fa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.087 {I9}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.051 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.018 {I4} (1988Pa12); DCO=0.95 {I23} (1994Ba43) in (HI,xn|g); |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,4n|g) (1987Fa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 68.5 keV {I5} and 66.9 keV {I5}, determined from |g-ce coincidence data in 1988Pa12 and 1989Su12, respectively (HI,xn|g) 
M$From L12/L3=1.3 {I2} and L12(M+N+O)=1.8 {I5} in (HI,xn|g) (1988Pa12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1,E2
decay_comment:
M$From (HI,xn|g), where DCO=0.94 {I25} (1994Ba43) supports Mult=E2, but |a(t)exp=0.141 {I22} in 1988Pa12 favors Mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$63 {I7} in 1972Kr08; I|g=90 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0238 {I16} and K/L(exp)=2.94 {I23} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.0266 {I13} (1973Pa04); |a(K)exp=0.028 {I6} (1972Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$0.9 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.39 {I8} and K/L(exp)=4.5 {I13} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.6 {I3} (1973Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$53 {I6} in 1972Kr08; I|g=85 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp<0.015; |a(L)exp<0.0022 (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} (1973Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$22 {I3} in 1972Kr08; I|g=848.5 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.108 {I8} and K/L(exp)=1.27 {I6} (1970Ha14); K/L=1.28 {I15} (1973Pa04); |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2} (1972Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From ce(L) in 1973Pa04. 
RI$Calculated from I(|g+ce)=6 {I3} (1973Pa04) and |a 
M$(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)/|a(L3)exp=1.2 {I3} (1973Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$0.7 {I3} in 1972Kr08; I|g=1 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp=1.27 {I26} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=1.3 {I5} and K/L>1.5 (1973Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$1.3 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I12} K/L(exp)=5.9 {I18} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.35 {I10} (1973Pa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$2.2 {I8} in 1972Kr08; I|g=1.9 in 1973Pa04 
M$|a(K)exp=0.33 {I7} (1970Ha14); |a(K)exp=0.28 {I10} (1973Pa04) |a(K)exp=0.36 {I6} (1972Kr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Average of 45.9 keV {I7} and 45.2 keV {I5}, determined from |g-ce coincidence data in 1988Pa12 and 1989Su12, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.087 {I9}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.051 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.018 {I4} (1988Pa12); DCO=0.95 {I23} (1994Ba43) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From intensity balances in 1988Pa12. The relatively small population of this level would argue against J=17; K/L in 1989Su12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Average of 68.5 keV {I5} and 66.9 keV {I5}, determined from |g-ce coincidence data in 1988Pa12 and 1989Su12, respectively 
M$L12/L3=1.3 {I2} and L12/(M+N+O)=1.75 {I50} in 1988Pa12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$M. Pautrat (Priv. Comm. to M. Schmorak) withdrew the E1 assignment in 1988Pa12; DCO=0.93 {I22} (1994Ba43) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1,E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.94 {I25} (1994Ba43) would support E2 assignment, but the |a(t)exp=0.141 {I22} in 1988Pa12 favor E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.6 {I2}, K/L=2.3 {I3} and L12/L3=4 {I1} (1956St05) and |a(L)exp=0.21 {I1} (1978Ri04) in {+201}Bi |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I20} in {+201}Bi |e decay; A{-2}=-0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I7} using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) are consistent with Mult=D. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=0.32 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1988Ro08) and A{-2}=0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1981He07) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=1.08 {I8} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.51 {I4}, A{-4}=0.15 {I6} (1988Ro08) and A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I4} (1981He07) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=0.81 {I11} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
RI$From {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g); I|g=68 {I6} in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
M$From A{-2}=0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g). Note, that A{-2}=0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} in 1981He07 ({+200}Hg(|a,3n|g)) would imply Mult=M1+E2; R(DCO)=0.95 {I13} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
RI$From {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 
M$From A{-2}=0.70 {I5}, A{-4}=0.04 {I6} (1988Ro08) and A{-2}=0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4} (1981He07) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1981He07) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=0.96 {I9} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D,E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I5} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=1.08 {I9} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g); consistent with |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$From {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
RI$From {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 
M$From A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=0.08 {I6} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=0.73 {I21} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g); the adopted spin and parity changes for 594.1|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$From {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
RI$From {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 
M$From A{-2}=-0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1988Ro08) and A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1981He07) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=0.80 {I8} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g); the adopted spin and parity changes for 600.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) and |a(exp)=0.34 {I3} (1981He07) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=0.93 {I10} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-1.06 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) and R(DCO)=0.61 {I4} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) and R(DCO)=1.00 {I14} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.48 {I4}, A{-4}=0.31 {I7} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) and R(DCO)=0.87 {I12} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.51 {I5}, A{-4}=0.02 {I8} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g); R(DCO)=0.76 {I5} and K/L (1989Su12) in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$Note, that I|g=76 {I8} in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) 
M$From A{-2}=-0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=0.07 {I6} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) and R(DCO)=0.78 {I7} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.87 {I5}, A{-4}=0.14 {I8} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) and R(DCO)=0.63 {I11} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.13 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1988Ro08) using |g(|q) in {+200}Hg(|a,3n|g) and R(DCO)=0.89 {I4} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$From R(DCO)=0.80 {I12} in {+192}Os({+14}C,5n|g). Note, that the authors give R(DCO)=0.8 {I12}, which is probably a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=9.1 {I21} from the intensity balance at the 88.5 level 
CC$From intensity balance at the 88.5-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed experimentally; E|g from E(level) difference 
RI$From intensity balance at the 169.9-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.6 {I2}, K/L=2.3 {I3} and L12/L3=4 {I1} in 1956St05; |a(L)exp=0.21 {I1} in 1978Ri04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From adopted gammas. Note, that A{-2}=0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=0.01 {I6} in 1988Ro08 are inconsistent with the adopted multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$100 in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=0.32 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} in 1988Ro08; A{-2}=0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} in 1981He07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$35 {I3} in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=-0.51 {I4}, A{-4}=0.15 {I6} in 1988Ro08; A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I4} in 1981He07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$26.0 {I25} in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} in 1988Ro08; Note, that A{-2}=0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} in 1981He07 would imply an M1+E2 assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$44 {I4} in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=0.70 {I5}, A{-4}=0.04 {I6} in 1988Ro08; A{-2}=0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4} in 1981He07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$4.1 {I4} in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I5} in 1988Ro08, consistent with |DJ=0 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$46 {I5} in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} in 1988Ro08; A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} in 1981He07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$32 {I3} in 1981He07 
M$A{-2}=0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6} in 1988Ro08; A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} in 1981He07; |a(exp)=0.34 {I3} in 1981He07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00585 {I28}, K/L=4.90 {I22} (1974Go32); |a(K)exp=0.0056 (1972Gu06) and K/L=5.0 {I7}, L12/L3=15 (1957Mc40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_comment:
E$From {+202}Pb IT decay 
RI$From I(|g+ce)(1382.8|g)/I(|g+ce)(422.1|g)=3.8|*10{+-6} {I6} in 1975Ha25 
M$K/L=3.4 {I7} in 1975Ha25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(L12)exp=0.126 {I12}, |a(L3)exp<0.004 (1974Go32) and |a(L12)exp=0.120 {I14} (1985Dz05); K/L=5.0 {I6} (1957Mc40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0058 {I3}, K/L=4.90 {I22} (1974Go32) and |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.00118 {I24} (1985Dz05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00445 {I14}, K/L=5.8 {I7} (1974Go32) and |a(K)exp=0.0049 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.00082 {I9} (1985Dz05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E5
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^10
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE5;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE5W
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1972Gu06 ({+202}Pb IT decay) 
M$|a(L)exp=0.34 {I15} (1972Gu06), K/L=0.8+1-8 L12/L3=6.0 {I15} (1957Mc40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E5
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^10
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE5;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE5W
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1972Gu06 ({+202}Pb IT decay) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.078 {I8} (1972Gu06), K/L=1.18 {I10} and L12/L3|?10 (1957Mc40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.32 {I7}, |a(L3)exp=0.142 {I11} (1974Go32) and |a(K)exp=0.27 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.140 {I23} (1985Dz05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.229 {I12} (1974Go32) and |a(K)exp=0.257 {I23} (1985Dz05). 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.229 {I12} (1974Go32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0566 {I22}, K/L=6.4 {I8} (1974Go32) and |a(K)exp=0.064 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0108 {I12} (1985Dz05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Calculated from level energy differences 
RI$From intensity ratio of the delayed component of 888.1|g and 1021.5|g, I(|g+ce)(179.7|g)/I(|g+ce)(46.3|g)=7.6 {I4} in 1986Ja13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(exp) [intensity balance] and A{-2}=-0.20 {I7}, A{-4}=0.06 {I9} in 1986Ja13; DCO=0.63 {I6} (2000Go47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.039 {I4} (1986Ja13); A{-2}=-0.85 {I6}, A{-4}=0.15 {I8} (1986Ja13,1987Fa15); DCO=0.29 {I5} (2000Go47) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D,Q)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1987Fa15) and DCO=1.01 {I9} (2000Go47) consistent with |DJ=0 or Q transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.6 {I4}, A{-4}=0.29 {I55} (1987Fa15); DCO=0.55 {I7} (2000Go47) 
RI$31 {I6} in {+192}Os({+14}C,4n|g); 50 {I5} in {+198}Pt({+9}Be,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce)(1382.8|g)/I(|g+ce)(422.12|g)=3.8|*10{+-6} {I6} in 1975Ha25. 
M$K/L=3.4 {I7} in 1975Ha25 allows E4, E5 or M5, but E5 and M5 can be ruled out since 422|g E2 to 2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas; Other: 240.3 keV {I1} in 1957Mc40 
RI$From ce(K)(240.3|g)/ce(K)(786.99|g)=0.040 {I3} (1957Mc40), since 240.3|g in {+202}Pb and 241.1|g in {+202}Tl are unresolved doublets in 1972Gu06 with I|g(240|g+241|g)=2.2 {I3}. 
M$K/L=5.0 {I6} in 1957Mc40 allows M1 or E1. The authors ruled out E1 from intensity balance considerations. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(L12)exp=0.126 {I12}, |a(L3)exp<0.004. |a(L12)exp=0.120 {I14} (1985Dz05). 
MR$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Calculated from level energy differences 
RI$From intensity ratio of the delayed component of 888.1|g and 1021.5|g, I(|g+ce)(179.7|g)/I(|g+ce)(46.3|g)=7.6 {I4} (1986Ja13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$ce(K)(E0)/ce(K)(E2)=6 {I2} (1986Ka07), and K/L=3.9 {I6} (1990Tr01), possibly affected by a nearby transition. The calculated K/L(E0)=6.03 (1990Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.29 {i12}(1976Ri10); K/L=5.8 {i4}, L1/L2=8.7 {i15}, L1/L3>20 (1960Be19); K/L=5.0 {i15} (1958No30). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0083 {i9} (1976Ri10), K/L=4.5 {i15} (1958No30) and K/(L1+L2)=4.9 {i10} (1960St21). Other: A{-2}=-0.05 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.54 {I9} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.44 {i5} (1976Ri10); K/L=5.0 {i15} (1958No30); K/(L1+L2)=5.2 {i5} (1960St21). Other: A{-2}=-0.39 {I5}, A{-4}=0.11 {I8} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=0.03 {I8} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g); |a(K)exp=0.0082 {I14} (1979Mc02) and |a(K)exp=0.0067 {I9} (1977Li04) in {+204}Hg(|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$K/L=1.2 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.074 {I10} (1979Mc02); |a(L)exp=0.0047 {I24} and |a(exp)=0.19 {I9} (1977Li04) in {+204}Hg(|a,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.20 {I6}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8}; |a(exp)=0.66 {I18} (1977Sa18); in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g); J to J transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.08 {I6}, A{-4}=0.31 {I8} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) and K/L=5.8 {I13} and |a(K)exp=0.053 {I11} (1979Mc02); |a(K)exp=0.054 {I6} (1977Li04) in {+204}Hg(|a,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From K/L=6.1 {I14} and |a(K)exp=0.011 {I1} (1979Mc02). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I11} (1977Li04); Other: A{-2}=-0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=0.05 {I8} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$K/L=3.9 {I4} and |a(K)exp=0.106 {I18} (1979Mc02); |a(K)exp=0.12 {I1} (1977Li04) in {+204}Hg(|a,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.70 {I4}, A{-4}=0.22 {I7} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g); DCO=0.64 {I6} in {+197}Au({+209}Bi,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8} in {+202}Hg(|a,3n|g); DCO=0.62 {I4} in {+197}Au({+209}Bi,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(820.0|g)/I|g(825.3|g)=7.8% {I5} (1977Li04). Others: 9.3% {I13} (1988Ro08) and 11.86% {I17} (1968Do11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I2} from 0.22 {I2} in 1961Pe11; |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} (1979Mc02); K/L=3.3 {I3} and |a(K)exp=0.22 (1977Li04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement based on |g|g coin of 1970CrZY; data of 1976Ri10, however, suggest that most of I|g deexcites the 2667 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=824 {I33} 
E$Other: 258.4 keV {I1} (1977Sa18) 
M$From adopted gammas. A{-2}=-0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=0.04 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=13 {I2} 
E$Other: 173.9 keV {I3} (1977Sa18) 
M$A{-2}=0.16 {I6}, A{-4}=0.14 {I8}; J to J transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=129 {I6} 
E$Other: 239.3 keV {I2} (1977Sa18) 
M$A{-2}=0.20 {I6}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8}; |a(exp)=0.66 {I18} (1977Sa18); J to J transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(singles)=68 {I4} 
M$K/L=1.2 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.074 {I10} (1979Mc02); |a(L)exp=0.0047 {I24} and |a(exp)=0.19 {I9} (1977Li04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 1979Mc02. Doublet in 1977Li04. 
M$K/L=7 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.9 {I3} (1979Mc02); |a(exp)=1.1 {I6} (1977Li04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g(singles)=14.9 {I8} 
E$The placement is in accordance with 1979Mc02, albeit some ambiguities exist due to the ordering of the 239.1|g and 634.2|g. 
M$K/L=5.8 {I13} and |a(K)exp=0.053 {I11} (1979Mc02); |a(K)exp=0.054 {I6} (1977Li04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(singles)=33 {I2} 
M,MR$From K/L=6.1 {I14} and |a(K)exp=0.011 {I1} (1979Mc02). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I11} (1977Li04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
$I|g(singles)=9.1 {I5} 
M$K/L=3.9 {I4} and |a(K)exp=0.106 {I18} (1979Mc02); |a(K)exp=0.12 {I1} (1977Li04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$1049.04 {I25} |g seen in {+204}Bi |e decay has |d<1.0 (<50% E2 admixture) according to 1984Dz05. This is possibly a different |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E5
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^10
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE5;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE5W
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$from {+204}Pb IT decay. 
BE5W$The contributions from 119.8|g and 368.0|g were not taken into account. Compare to B(E5)(W.u.)=0.51 {I17} in {+202}Pb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E5
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^10
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE5;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE5W
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$from {+204}Pb IT decay. 
BE5W$The contributions from 119.8|g and 368.0|g were not taken into account. Compare to B(E5)(W.u.)=3.8 {I4} in {+202}Pb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp of 1984Dz05 in |e decay. Another possibility is M1+E2 with |d<3; however, that is inconsistent with J|p. Possibly this |g is an M1,E1 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. E|g=899.15 keV {I10} in 1970CrZY 
RI$100 {I15} (relative intensity) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0065 {I4}, K/L=4.9 {I3} (1971Ha39). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. E|g=374.74 keV {I10} in 1970CrZY 
RI$From intensity balances using I|g(889.15|g)=99.174% {I12} and I|g(663.43|g)=0.0022% {I22} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0386 {I13}, K/L=2.25 {I5} (1971Ha39). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E4]
decay_comment:
E$From 1972Si22. 
RI$0.012 {I2} (relative intensity), branching ratio from 1972Si22; however, 1988ZhZT report I|g=0.046 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,MR$From adopted gammas. 
RI$0.249 {I20} (relative intensity) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.39 {I3}, K/L=5.4 {I8} (1971Ha39). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E5
decay_comment:
E$From 1956He50. 
RI$0.219 {I20} (relative intensity) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.159 {I19}, K/L=0.83 {I4} (1971Ha39). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E5
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balances using I|g(374.76|g)=94.20% {I14} and I|g(289.30|g)=0.25% {I5} 
M$|a=0.099 {I2} in 1988ZhZT based on I|g(899)/I|g(912)=1.0935 {I10} and intensity balance; |a(K)exp=0.056 {I3} (1954Ma78), 0.0549 {I20} (1956He50), 0.055 {I5} (1972Gu06); K/L=1.66 {I25} (1972Gu06), 1.7 {I8} (1956He50). Also from |g|g(|q) of 1955Kr06, 1956Hu30, 1967Li12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas 
MR$From adopted gammas. Other: <1.0 (1984Dz05). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I9}/0.22 {I4}=0.014 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From adopted gammas. Other: 1.1 {I4} in {+204}Bi |e decay. 
$|a(K)exp=0.057 {I6}/3.4 {I4}=0.017 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Observed |g reported only by 1958Fr53; seen in ce spectrum by 1972Hn01 
TI$<0.5% from ce data of 1958Fr53. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E5]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated from ce(K)(368)/ce(K)(375)=0.02 (1958St99), assuming that 368.3|g is E1 and 368.45|g is E2; 1958St99's measured ce(K)(368) would contain unresolved contributions from each of the 368|g decays. 
RI$Ik(368) = Ik(368.0 E5) + Ik(368.30 E1) + Ik(368.45 (E2)) =ak(368.0 E5)Ig(368.0)+ak(368.30 E1)Ig(368.30)+ak(368.45(E2))Ig(368.45) where the ak's come from BRICC and the Ig's for 368.30 and 368.45 are determined by other authors. Ik(368)=0.02Ik(375), which can be obtained from the ak(375 E2) and measured Ig(375). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. Existence inferred from I|g(984) in delayed spectra of 1978So02. 
RI$From I(|g+ce)=6.3, deduced from intensity balance in 1978So02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp=1.6 {I3}/0.78 {I13}=2.1 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=0.17 {I4}/0.78 {I13}=0.22 {I6}. 
MR$From |a(L3)exp. Other: <0.7 from |a(L1)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR$From adopted gammas. Other: <0.1 in {+204}Bi |e decay 
$|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I7}/0.96 {I14}=0.0028 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$From |a(K)exp of 1984Dz05. Another possibility is M1+E2 with |d<3; however, that is inconsistent with J|p. Possibly this |g is an M1,E1 doublet. 
$|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}/0.42 {I8}=0.0029 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00120 {I22}/0.21 {I3}=0.0057 {I13}; evaluator assumes that Ice(K)=0.0012 {I22} quoted by 1984Dz05 is an error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not labelled as such in 2002Lu04, but is presumably the prominent peak to the right of the 1004|g in Fig.2 of 2002Lu04. E|g taken from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not labelled as such in 2002Lu04, but is presumably the prominent peak to the left of the 324|g in Fig.2 of 2002Lu04. E|g taken from adopted |g's. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$found by 1978Li01 to be consistent with zero, |d=-0.04 {I7}. 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I20}, |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I7}, K/L=4.8 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1978Li01 
$A{-2}=-0.143 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.031 {I7}, |a(K)exp=0.017 {I8}, K/L=8 {I5}; ce intensities are corrected for contamination by the 323.2-keV transition in {+205}Pb. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$found by 1978Li01 to be consistent with zero, |d=-0.01 {I3}. 
$A{-2}=+0.325 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.048 {I9}, K/L=3.5 {I6}; |a(K)exp normalized to 1968Ha53 theoretical value 0.014 for pure E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.21 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} 
$1978Li01 considered the intensities of transitions into and out of the 4301.8-keV level and placed the limits 2.0 {I2}<|a(exp)<5.0 {I6} for 167.2|g, consistent with an M1 assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$found by 1978Li01 to be consistent with zero, |d=-0.01 {I+4-3}. 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR$found by 1978Li01 to be consistent with zero, |d=0.00 {I2}. 
$A{-2}=-0.232 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}, |a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
MR$found by 1978Li01 to be consistent with zero, |d=-0.04 {I8}. 
$A{-2}=-0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$found by 1978Li01 to be consistent with zero, |d=0.05 {I7}. 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I2}, |a(K)exp=0.031 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$2003En07 give the branching fraction to the g.s. as 0.36 {I+23-16}. 
$----------------------------------- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2003En07 give the branching fraction to the g.s. as 0.74 {I+26-20}. 
$----------------------------------- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2003En07 give the branching fraction to the g.s. as 0.32 {I+21-14}. 
$----------------------------------- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Possibly a doublet from 1582.4, 0+ state (see 1989Tr14) 
MR$from 1989DeZT. |d=-1.7 or -0.2 in 1988Ha16, no uncertainties given. 
M$A{-2}=0.31 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR$The second solution of |d=+23 of 1988Ha16 is excluded by |a(K)exp in {+204}Bi |e decay. 
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}. 
M$M1, as stated in 1988Ha16, cannot be confirmed by G(THETA). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$791.20 {I9} in {+204}Bi |e decay 
MR$Weighted average of -0.9 {I5} (1988Ha16) and -1.25 {I25} (1989DeZT). Contrary to the statement of 1988Ha16, there is no disagreement about the sign of |d(791|g); the |a data in {+204}Bi decay do not determine the sign of |d. 
M$A{-2}=0.65 {I7}, A{-4}=0.18 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Not observed in {+204}Bi |e decay. Based on |g spectrum of 1970CrZY, evaluator estimates that I|g(592.5)<0.5% rather than the 3% reported by 1988Ha16. Note that J|p assignments would imply mult E3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M$Consistent with pure D; 1988Ha16 assign E1, but |g(|q) does not rule out M1. 
MR$From 1980Da10. |d=0.0 in 1988Ha16, no uncertainty given. 
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$In {+204}Bi |e decay, E|g=1064.32 {I4}. The (n,n'|g) experiments were not sensitive to the low-energy (80.15-keV) transition deexciting the 2338.30-keV level in {+204}Bi |e decay. 
M$A{-2}=0.21 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$Average of +2.0 (1988Ha16, no uncertainty given) and +0.9 {I3} (1989DeZT). 
M$A{-2}=-0.80 {I6}, A{-4}=0.24 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Results of 1989Tr14 suggest that this |g is a doublet. E|g measured in 1986Ka07 |g|g-coin but quoted in 1989Tr14. 
RI$Upper limit, due to doublet. 
$ce(K)=0.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=0.13, K/L=3.4 {I16}. 1986Ka07 report ce(K)(E0)/ce(K)(E2)=0.60 {I6} in (p,2n|g). 1989Tr14 report ce(K)(E0)/ce(K)(E2)>14 in (p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$|g used to identify 2n transfer channel, but measured E|g not quoted; value taken from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Not observed in 2007Me09, obscured by a stronger 897.78-keV line from {+209}Bi(|m{+-},2n|g){+207}Pb; E|g taken from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$|g was observed in 2007Me09, but they quote E|g from the previous Nuclear Data Sheets evaluation; here, E|g taken from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$W(90|')/W(127|')=1.1 {I3} 
E$transition is known in literature and could correspond to possible branch of the 7129-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$W(90|')/W(127|')=0.68 {I12} 
E$transition is known in literature and could correspond to possible branch of the 7368-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$From {+209}Po |a decay 
M$From |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.50 {I6} and K/L=5.5 {I7} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.56 {I13}, average of values given in 1959St42 and 1960St24; |a(K)exp=0.538 {I20} (1996Sc24). 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1996Sc24. Other: |d=1.6 {I2} from |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$From {+209}Po |a decay 
M$From |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.45 {I7} and K/L=5.8 {I7} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.40 {I10} (1960St24); |a(K)exp=0.524 {I20} (1996Sc24). 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1996Sc24. Other: |d=-0.7 {I2} from |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=0.625 {I1} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0110 {I10} and K/L=4.6 {I4} (1972Ha71); K/L=4.2 {I1} (1956Sc18); |a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} (1956Sc18) 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L, and |d=+7.2 {I8} (1990Si13) and 6 {I1} from 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.37 {I5} (1972Ha71) and 0.38 {I9}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From |a(K)exp. Other: 0.06 {I6} from |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I7} and K/L=5.6 {I8} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.0054 {I5}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I3} (1972Ha71) and 0.17 {I7} (1960St24); |a(exp) using |g-ray intensity balance in {+204}Hg({+9}Be,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.39 {I6} (1972Ha71) and 0.42 {I7}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=0.001 {I1} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0130 {I14} and K/L=6.8 {I10} (1972Ha71); |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.013 {I2}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L, and |d=0.03 {I1} (1990Si13) and -0.15 {I15} (1973Ah01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.39 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I+3-9} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.082 {I11} (1972Ha71) and 0.07 {I2} (1956Sc18). 
MR$From |a(K)exp and |d=-0.089 (1990Si13) and -0.4 {I1} (1973Ah01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.3 {I1}, A{-4}=0.000 {I2} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I14} (1972Ha71) and 0.0074 {I21}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and |d in 1990Si13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.22 {I5} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0151 {I18} and K/L=3.5 {I8} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.015 {I2}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.182 {I25} and K/L=4.9 {I13} (1972Ha71) and |a(K)exp=0.21 {I3}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.43 {I+3-7} A{-4}=0.0 (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.064 {I7} and K/L=5.8 {I12} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.065 {I10}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and |d=-0.01 {I+10-3} (1990Si13) and 0.8 {I1} from (1973Ah01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} (1972Ha71) and 0.018 {I3}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From 1973Ah01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=1.09 {I+1-4}, A{-4}=0.26 {I+8-7} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I11} (1972Ha71) and 0.0053 {I13} (1956Sc18). 
MR$From |a(K)exp and |d=-0.84 {I+17-23} (1990Si13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}; A{-2}=+0.27 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.09 {I1}; |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2}; K/L=4.4 {I4} (1976Li09); A{-2}=0.29 {I4} and A{-4}=0.003 {I4} (1973Be32); A{-2}=0.25 {I8}; pol=0.04 {I13} (1994Po20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K/L=6.0 {I3} (1956Sc18); internal pair coef=3.4 |* 10{+-4} {I6} (1971Al03); A{-2}=0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.002 {I1} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I5} and K/L=6.6 {I8} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I9}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L, and |d=+0.055 {I+10-8} (1990Si13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.26 {I+6-7}, A{-4}=0.001 {I+2-1} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I10} (1972Ha71) and 0.0043 {I12}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From 1990Si13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.22 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.24 {I1} and A{-4}|<0.001; |a(K)exp=0.28 {I5}; K/L=5.3 {I8} (1976Li09); A{-2}=-0.22 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1973Be32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.04 {I5}, A{-4}=0.002 {I+2-1} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0094 {I18} (1972Ha71) and 0.011 {I2} (1956Sc18). 
MR$From |a(K)exp and |d=-0.08 {I3} (1990Si13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.3 {I+1-2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I+1-4} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.092 {I13} (1972Ha71) and 0.12 {I2} (1956Sc18). 
MR$From 1990Si13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.30 {I+1-4}, A{-4}=0.0 (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.00089 {I3} (1972Ha71) and 0.0010 {I3}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From 1990Si13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.32 {I+2-3} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2} (1972Ha71) and 0.00078 {I18}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From 1990Si13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I5} and |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I3} (1976Li09); A{-2}=-0.17 {I5} and A{-4}=0.10 {I5} (1973Be32) in {+204}Hg(|a,3n|g); A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}; pol=+0.06 {I19} in {+204}Hg({+9}Be,xn|g) (1994Po20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, |a(K)exp=0.0067 {I14} (1976Li09); A{-2}=0.33 {I4} and A{-4}=0.08 {I6} (1973Be32); A{-2}=0.08 {I3} (1994Po20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.30 {I8}; A{-2}=+0.27 {I2} and A{-4}=-0.10 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.032 {I4}; K/L=2.7 {I3} (1976Li09); A{-2}=0.30 {I8} and A{-4}=-0.2 {I1} (1973Be32); A{-2}=0.43 {I7}; pol=+0.53 {I17} (1994Po20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Jo06 
M$ From N2/N3=0.70 {I25} in 1971Jo06. 
RI$From intensity balance at the 2.329-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.50 {I6} and K/L=5.5 {I7} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.56 {I13}, average of values given in 1959St42 and 1960St24. 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1996Sc24. Other: |d=1.6 {I2} from |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.45 {I7} and K/L=5.8 {I7} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.40 {I10} (1960St24). 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1996Sc24. Other: |d=-0.7 {I2} from |g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=0.625 {I1} (1990Si13); |a(K)exp=0.0110 {I10} and K/L=4.6 {I4} (1972Ha71); K/L=4.2 {I1} (1956Sc18); |a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} (1956Sc18) 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L, and |d=7.2 {I8} (1990Si13) and 6 {I1} from 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.182 {I25} and K/L=4.9 {I13} (1972Ha71); |a(K)exp=0.21 {I3}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1973Ah01; |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} (1972Ha71) and 0.018 {I3}, average of values given in 1956Sc18 and 1959St42. 
MR$From 1973Ah01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR$From adopted gammas; |a(K)exp=0.538 {I20} (1996Sc24); |a(K)exp(260.5|g+262.8|g)=0.495 {i1}; K/(L+M)exp(260.5|g+262.8|g)=4.44 {i10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=0.0118 {I16} 
E$From level energy differences 
RI$From I|g delayed(26.2|g)/I|g delayed (310.3|g)=0.0066 {I11} and I|g singles(310.3|g)=0.5 {I1}. 
$I|g delayed: From I(|g+ce)(26.2|g)=I(|g+ce)(987.5|g) + I(|g+ce)(703.2|g) - I(|g+ce)(310.3|g), I|g delayed for 987.5|g, 703.2|g and 310.3|g, and CCs 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=100 {I5} 
M$A{-2}=+0.29 {I4}; A{-2}=+0.27 {I1} and A{-4}=-0.09 {I1}; |a(K)exp=0.011 {I2}; K/L=4.4 {I4} (1976Li09); A{-2}=0.29 {I4} and A{-4}=0.003 {I4} (1973Be32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=87 {I6} 
M$A{-2}=-0.22 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.24 {I1} and A{-4}|<0.001; |a(K)exp=0.28 {I5}; K/L=5.3 {I8} (1976Li09); A{-2}=-0.22 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1973Be32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=90 {I6} 
M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}; |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I3} (1976Li09); A{-2}=-0.17 {I5} and A{-4}=0.10 {I5} (1973Be32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=0.031 {I8} 
E$From level energy differences 
RI$From I|g delayed(27.7|g)/I|g delayed (1175.1|g)=0.0024 {I6} and I|g(1175.1|g)=6.8 {I4}. 
$I|g delayed: From I(|g+ce)(27.8|g)=I(|g+ce)(612.2|g) + I(|g+ce)(1147.4|g) - I(|g+ce)(430.4|g), I|g delayed for 612.2|g, 1147.4|g and 430.4|g, and CCs 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=13 {I1} 
M$A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.0067 {I14} (1976Li09); A{-2}=0.33 {I4} and A{-4}=0.08 {I6} (1973Be32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=5.3 {I4} 
M$A{-2}=+0.30 {I8}; A{-2}=+0.27 {I2} and A{-4}=-0.10 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.032 {I4}; K/L=2.7 {I3} (1976Li09); A{-2}=0.30 {I8} and A{-4}=-0.2 {I1} (1973Be32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1.21 {I15} 
$I|g delayed: From I(|g+ce)(284.0|g)=I(|g+ce)(1154.4|g) + I(|g+ce)(1251.7|g), I|g delayed for 1251.7|g and 1154.4|g and CCs 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=0.31 {I8} 
RI$From I|g delayed(97.1|g)/I|g delayed (1535.6|g)=0.097 {I27} and I|g(1535.6|g)=2.0 {I3}. 
M$|a(exp)=8 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.02 {I2}. Value is inconsistent with the assigned multipolarities presumably due to the attenuation of the initial spin alignment for this state; pol=-0.06 {i6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Measured E|g in 2007Me09 is somewhat different, indicating that it may be associated with another decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Other: 803.10 keV {I5} (1972Ma63) and 803.06 keV {I10} (2007Me09) 
M$K:L:M(exp)=0.808 {I50}:0.161 {I16}:0.062 {I15} and |a(K)exp=0.00808 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.00161 {I16} and |a(M)exp=0.00062 {I15} (1977Dr08); |a(K)exp=0.0081 {I14} (1999Oh02); K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=100:21.6 {I11}:1.99 {I11}:5.35 {I27}:1.73 {I10} (1972Ka30); A{-2}=0.13 {I1}, A{-4}=0.04 {I1} (1993Bl02); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From ce measurements in 1977Dr08. 
M$K:L:M(exp)=0.40 {I5}:0.067 {I7}: <0.03 (1977Dr08); K:L=5.61 {I38} (1990Tr01) 
TI$From {+206}Tl |b{+-} decay. Monopole strength |r=0.026 {I3} (1972Ta18) and 0.034 {I2} (1976Ju03) in {+206}Pb(p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 537.45 keV {I4} (1972Ma63) and 537.47 keV {I10} (2007Me09) 
M$|g(|q) in 1973Ka35, 1993Bl02; |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01, 1980Ba19, 1989BeYQ; |g(|q) and pol in 1994Po20; K:L1+L2:L3:M:N+O=257 {I10}:46.3 {I21}:0.253 {I33}:8.43 {I44}:3.23 {I18} (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp)=0.068 {I3} (1972Ma63); K:L(exp)=5.3 {I8} and |a(K)exp=0.070 {I8} (1977Dr08); 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1+L2:L3:M:N+O(exp) in 1972Ka30, K:L(exp) in 1977Dr08, |a(K)exp in 1972Ma63 and 1977Dr08, and |d=+0.001 {I5} in 1973Ka35. Others: |d=-0.221 {I80} (1977Mc01), -0.05 {I10} (1980Ba19) and -0.02 {I2} (1989BeYQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |g(|q) in {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) (1989BeYQ). Other Mult: from A{-2}=0.26 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I14} (1993Bl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 344.51 keV {I3} (1972Ma63) and 343.52 keV {I10} (2007Me09) 
RI$Others: 42.2 {I17} in {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) and 100 {I22} in (|p,3n|g) 
M$|g(|q) in 1973Ka35, 1993Bl02; |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01, 1980Ba19, 1989BeYQ; |g(|q) and pol in 1994Po20; K:L:M(exp)=6.5 {I4}:0.96 {I7}:0.26 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.227 {I30} (1977Dr08); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=675 {I27}:108 {I4}:11.3 {I6}:0.797 {I59}: 42.4 {I18}:10.6 {I4}:1.71 {I7} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.230 {I13} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2:L3(exp) in 1972Ka30, K:L:M(exp) in 1977Dr08, |a(K)exp in 1972Ma63, and |d=+0.001 {I3} in 1973Ka35 and 0.002 {I20} in 1977Mc01. Others: |d=0.085 {I63} (1980Ba19) and -0.11 {I4} (1989BeYQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 881.01 keV {I5} (1972Ma63) and 880.98 keV {I10} (2007Me09) 
M$|g(|q) 1993Bl02; |g(|q) and pol in 1994Po20; K:L(exp)=5.6 {I1}, |a(K)exp=0.0071 {I7} (1977Dr08); K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=55.4 {I24}:11.5 {I6}: 0.73 {I5}:2.90 {I16}:0.94 {I11}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.0067 {I4} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 313.67 keV {I7} (1972Ma63) 
RI$Other: 26 {I4} in {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) 
M$|g(|q) (1989BeYQ,1993Bl02); K:N=14.80 {I75}:0.101 {I34} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.330 {I27} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: |d=-0.23 {I5} (1989BeYQ), K:N(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 657.16 keV {I5} (1972Ma63) and 657.18 keV {I10} (2007Me09) 
M$|g(|q) (1989BeYQ,1993Bl02); K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=10.2 {I5}:1.71 {I10}:0.033 {I19}:0.431 {I35}:0.141 {I30} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.043 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: |d=0.15 {I2} 1989BeYQ, K:L1+L2:L3(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1194.68 keV {I8} (1972Ma63) 
RI$Other: 9.8 {I23} in {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) 
M$K:L1+L2=0.132 {I16}:0.0387 {I99}(1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0038 {I7} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+205}Pb(n,|g), E=thermal (1996Ra16) 
RI$From {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) 
M,MR$From |g(|q) (1989BeYQ) in {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+205}Pb(n,|g), E=thermal (1996Ra16) 
RI$From {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) 
M,MR$From |g(|q) in {+206}Pb(n,n'|g) (1989BeYQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N:O=2.25 {I18}:0.684 {I23}:7.87 {I44}:3.78 {I21}: 3.46 {I20}: 0.907 {I94}:1.24 {I12}: 0.223 {I50} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.414 {I78} (1972Ma63); |a(K)exp=0.052 {I5} and K:L:M(exp)=4.80 {I32}:2.92 {I24}:0.78 {I12} (1977Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) (1989BeYQ) and |g|g(|q) (1980Ba19); K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=3350 {I130}:509 {I21}:55.0 {I25}:3.67 {I19}: 135 {I5}: 33.7 {I19}:7.59 {I44} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=1.69 {I10} (1972Ma63); 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=-0.013 {I25} (1980Ba19) and -0.01 {I2} (1989BeYQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=208 {I8}:32.9 {I15}:3.58 {I27}:0.235 {I42}: 8.33 {I45}: 2.23 {I12}: 0.357 {I36} (1972Ka30); |g(|q) in 1973Ka35; |a{-K}(exp)=0.155 {I5} (1972Ma63); |g|g(|q) in 1980Ba19 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=+0.038 {I3} (1973Ka35) and 0.028 {I42} (1980Ba19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=3.60 {I19}:0.472 {I26}: 0.0207 {I32}:0.120 {I9}: 0.0310 {I45} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0021 {I2} (1972Ma63); |g(|q) (1993Bl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L1+L2=1.26 {I9}:0.204 {I39} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.113 {I22} (1972Ma63); |g(|q) (1993Bl02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L1+L2:M=0.540 {I95}:0.088 {I22}: 0.0221 {I60} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.044 {I11} (1972Ma63); |g(|q) in 1993Bl02 consistent with |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L1:L2:M=6.4 {I13}:1.03 {I12}: 0.123 {I51}: 0.234 {I59} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=1.44 {I50} (1972Ma63); |d using the briccmixing code 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M=0.622 {I40}:0.142 {I37}: 0.030 {I13} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.032 {I4} (1972Ma63); |d using the briccmixing code 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N=25.3 {I12}:3.78 {I21}: 0.404 {I38}: 0.86 {I16}: 0.200 {I76} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.840 {I85} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and K:L1:L2:M:N(exp) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N:O=24.5 {I12}:3.91 {I45}: 1.11 {I7}: 0.308 {I23}: 0.112 {I22} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.044 {I3} (1972Ma63); |g|g(|q) (1980Ba19) |g(|q) (1993Bl02) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:M:N(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=-0.12 {I2} (1980Ba19, |g|g(|q)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N=0.443 {I45}:0.0730 {I16}: 0.0154 {I61}: 0.0166 {I86} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.019 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:M(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a{-K}(exp)=0.0025 {I9} by the evaluator from Ice(K)[803|g] and Ice(K)[1246|g] in 1972Ka30, I|g(803|g) and I|g(1246|g) from 1972Ma63, and |a(K,exp)[803|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2=0.0485 {I85}:0.0056 {I28} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.00102 {I23} by the evaluator from Ice(K)[803|g] and Ice(K)[1560|g] in 1972Ka30, I|g(803|g) and I|g(1560|g) from 1972Ma63, and |a(K,exp)[803|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$L1:L2:M:N=55.6 {I31}: 6.30 {I41}: 13.9 {I23}: 3.74 {I61} (1972Ka30). |d was determined using the briccmixing code 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N:O=208 {I9}:33.9 {I18}: 3.58 {I20}: 7.93 {I43}: 2.84 {I17}: 0.507 {I62} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.551 {I35} (1972Ma63); 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2:M(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L1=2.56 {I15}: 0.426 {I42} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.131 {I15} (1972Ma63). |d was determined using the briccmixing code 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) in 1973Ka35, 1993Bl02; |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01, 1980Ba19; K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=169 {I7}: 28.6 {I14}: 0.189 {I21}: 6.75 {I35}: 2.10 {I20} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.088 {I5} (1972Ma63); 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1+L2:L3:M:N(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=-0.09 {I2} (1973Ka35) and -0.02 {I11} (1980Ba19); Other: |d=-0.194 {I21} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) in 1973Ka35, 1993Bl02; |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01; K:L1+L2:M:N=34.0 {I15}: 5.33 {I28}: 1.51 {I9}: 0.485 {I34} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0174 {I18} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1+L2:M(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=-0.030 {I3} (1973Ka35) and 0.047 {I25} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M:N=0.654 {I33}: 0.0426 {I55}: 0.0094 {I29}: 0.0033 {I17} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0010 {I1} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M=11.5 {I24}: 2.58 {I14}: 0.270 {I76}: 0.51 {I13} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=4.05 {I110} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2:M(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M=27.3 {I15}: 4.39 {I22}: 0.460 {I90}: 1.14 {I14} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=2.66 {I37} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2:M(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2=11.0 {I5}: 2.35 {I15}: 0.177 {I17} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.171 {I12} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L1:L2(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:M:N=1.07 {I11}: 0.0429 {I86}: 0.0180 {I60} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.16 {I4} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:M:N(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M:N=0.892 {I52}: 0.140 {I30}: 0.045 {I12}: 0.0110 {I29} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.064 {I10} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L12:M:N(exp) (1972Ka30) and |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01, 1980Ba19; K:L1+L2:L3:NO=38.8 {I17}: 6.39 {I35}: 0.035 {I14}: 0.471 {I32} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.054 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L12:L3:NO(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=-0.33 {I29} (1980Ba19) and -0.082 {I10} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) in 1973Ka35,1993Bl02 and |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01; K:L1+L2:M:N=13.5 {I7}: 2.78 {I14}: 0.671 {I36}: 0.206 {I15} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0142 {I10} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Using the briccmixing code and the following data: K:L12:M:N(exp) (1972Ka30), |a{-K}(exp) (1972Ma63) and |d=-0.018 {I3} (1973Ka35) and 0.055 {I20} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M:N=3.12 {I16}: 0.142 {I8}: 0.0371 {I24}: 0.0092 {I13} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.00078 {I5} (1972Ma63) 
CC$Measured internal pair conversion coefficient |b{-|p}=3.06 x 10{+-4} {I{15}} (1998Wu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,M$From 1993Bl02 in {+204}Hg(|a,2n|g) 
RI$From 1982DiZT in {+206}Pb(n,n|g). Other: 100 (1993Bl02) {+204}Hg(|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I4} (1977Dr08); |g(|q) in 1993Bl02 and 1994Po20 consistent with D transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.0055% {I4} (1970Zo02), 0.0041% {I6} (1972CoYX) and 0.0040% {I10} (1972Gr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. 
RI$From <0.00026% in 1972CoYX, which is a 2|s limit. Others: <0.001% (1972Gr01) and <0.001% (1968Zo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas 
TI$Based on the assumption that the K x rays are produced from the E0 transition and shake-off electrons. I(|g+ce) is deduced as follow: (a) I(K| x ray) is the weighted mean of I(K| x ray)=0.08% {I2} (1972Gr01) and 0.10% {I2} (1972CoYZ), deduced after a correction for shake-off was taken into account; (b) Ice(K)=I(K| x ray)/|w(K), where the fluorescence yield is |w(K)=0.963 {I4} (1996Sc06); (c) ce(K)/tot=0.85 {I6}, the weighted average of 0.85 {I6} and 0.86 {I14}, values deduced from the measured K/L=5.61 {I38} (1990Tr01) and 6.0 {I10} (1977Dr08), respectively. It should be noted that the BRICC program (2008Ki07) gives ce(K)/tot=|W(E0,K)/|W(E0,t)=0.8554 in very good agreement with the experimentally determined value of 0.85 {I6}. Thus, I(|g+ce)=I(K| x ray)/|w(K)/[ce(K)/tot]=0.090% {I10}/0.963{I4}/ 0.85 {I6}=0.110% {I19}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$100 {I6} in 1977Dr08 contains direct feeding to the 7- isomer 
M$K:L:M(exp)=0.808 {I50}:0.161 {I16}:0.062 {I15} (1977Dr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$30 {I3} in 1977Dr08 contains direct feeding to the 7- isomer 
M$K:L(exp)=5.3 {I8}, |a(K)exp=0.070 {I8} (1977Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$29 {I3} in 1977Dr08 contains direct feeding to the 7- isomer 
M$K:L:M(exp)=6.5 {I4}:0.96 {I7}:0.26 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.227 {I30} (1977Dr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$68 {I4} in 1977Dr08 contains direct feeding to the 7- isomer 
M$K:L(exp)=5.6 {I1}, |a(K)exp=0.0071 {I7} (1977Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$93 {I5} in 1977Dr08 contains direct feeding to the 7- isomer 
M$K:L:M(exp)=4.80 {I32}:2.92 {I24}:0.78 {I12}, |a(K)exp=0.052 {I5} (1977Dr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1977Dr08 
RI$From intensity balance [I(|g+ce)(69.7|g)=I(|g+ce)(1299.1|g)] at the 3957-keV level 
M$L:M(exp)=3.5 {I7} (1977Dr08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$K:L:M(exp)=0.093 {I1}:0.022 {I3}:0.0085 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I11} (1977Dr08). 
RI$Note that 1977Dr08 stated that part of I|g(1639|g) is from {+24}Na impurities, but the intensity balance is good with the intensities adopted here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$ce-ce(|q) measurements of 1964Sa37 indicate that the 803|g is of E2 character; |g(|q) in 1973Ka35; K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=100:21.6 {I11}:1.99 {I11}:5.35 {I27}:1.73{I10} (1972Ka30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$ce-ce(|q) measurements of 1964Sa37 indicate that the 537|g is of predominantly M1 character; |g(|q) in 1973Ka35; |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01; |g|g(|q) in 1980Ba19; K:L1+L2:L3:M:N+O=257 {I10}:46.3 {I21}:0.253 {I33}:8.43 {I44}:3.23 {I18} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.068 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Others: -0.221 {I80} (1977Mc01) and -0.05 {I10} (1980Ba19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) in 1973Ka35; |g|g(|q) in 1977Mc01; |g|g(|q) in 1980Ba19; K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=675 {I27}:108 {I4}:11.3 {I6}:0.797 {I59}:42.4 {I18}: 10.6 {I4}:1.71 {I7} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.230 {I13} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Others: 0.002 {I20} (1977Mc01) and 0.085 {I63} (1980Ba19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=55.4 {I24}:11.5 {I6}:0.73 {I5}:2.90 {I16}:0.94 {I11}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.0067 {I4} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:N=14.80 {I75}:0.101 {I34} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.330 {I27} (1972Ma63) 
MR$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=10.2 {I5}:1.71 {I10}:0.033 {I19}:0.431 {I35}: 0.141 {I30} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.043 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N:O=2.25 {I18}:0.684 {I23}:7.87 {I44}:3.78 {I21}: 3.46 {I20}: 0.907 {I94}:1.24 {I12}: 0.223 {I50} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.414 {I78} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N+O=242 {I10}:48.1 {I24}:90.9 {I39}:23.1 {I11}: 42.9 {I20}: 13.3 {I7} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.048 {I2} (1972Ma63) 
MR$ Other: 0.013 {I23} (1980Ba19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=3350 {I130}:509 {I21}:55.0 {I25}:3.67 {I19}: 135 {I5}: 33.7 {I19}:7.59 {I44} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=1.69 {I10} (1972Ma63); |g|g(|q) in 1980Ba19 
MR$Other: -0.013 {I25} (1980Ba19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a{-K}(exp)=0.00071 {I11} (1972Ma63) 
CC$Measured internal pair conversion coefficient |b{-|p}=4.65|*10{+-4} {I{15}} for the combined 1844-, 1879-, and 1904-keV transitions (1998Wu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Authors in 1972Ma63 reported I|g=10.86 {I1}, but the evaluator assumed that the uncertainty is a typo and increased it 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=208 {I8}:32.9 {I15}:3.58 {I27}:0.235 {I42}: 8.33 {I45}: 2.23 {I12}: 0.357 {I36} (1972Ka30); |g(|q) in 1973Ka35; |a{-K}(exp)=0.155 {I5} (1972Ma63); |g|g(|q) in 1980Ba19 
MR$Other: +0.038 {I3} (1973Ka35) and 0.028 {I42} (1980Ba19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=3.60 {I19}:0.472 {I26}: 0.0207 {I32}:0.120 {I9}: 0.0310 {I45} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0021 {I2} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(L1)[44.11|g]=12.2 {I15}, theoretical (BRICC) |a[44.11|g]=13.01 {I19}, using |d=0.04 {I4}, and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 
M$L1:L2:M=12.2 {I15}:1.37 {I40}: 2.61 {I84} (1972Ka30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2,E3
decay_comment:
M$|a{-K}(exp)=0.0047 {I27} (1972Ma63) 
M$ce data allow M2,M3,E3 but placement in level scheme precludes M3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M=6.4 {I13}:1.03 {I12}: 0.123 {I51}: 0.234 {I59} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=1.44 {I50} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[190.04|g]=1.90 {I22}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[190.04|g]=0.7 {I6} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N=25.3 {I12}:3.78 {I21}: 0.404 {I38}: 0.86 {I16}: 0.200 {I76} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.840 {I85} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N:O=24.5 {I12}:3.91 {I45}: 1.11 {I7}: 0.308 {I23}: 0.112 {I22} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.044 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Other: -0.12 {I2} [1980Ba19, |g|g(|q)] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[816.25|g]=0.049 {I19}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[816.25|g]=0.00778 {I11} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[360.82|g]=0.089 {I41}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[360.82|g]=0.13 {I9} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[443.20|g]=0.153 {I70}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[443.20|g]=0.07 {I5} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N=0.443 {I45}:0.0730 {I16}: 0.0154 {I61}: 0.0166 {I86} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.019 {I3} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty increased 4|s by the evaluator 
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[227.65|g]=0.153 {I70}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[227.65|g]=0.4 {I4} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(L1)[34.954|g]=55.6 {I31}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(L1)[34.954|g]=25.9 {I4}, using |d=0.023 {I18}, and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 
M$L1:L2:M:N=55.6 {I31}: 6.30 {I41}: 13.9 {I23}: 3.74 {I61} (1972Ka30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N:O=208 {I9}:33.9 {I18}: 3.58 {I20}: 7.93 {I43}: 2.84 {I17}: 0.507 {I62} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.551 {I35} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[339.85|g]=2.48 {I27}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[339.85|g]=0.15 {I10} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N=169 {I7}: 28.6 {I14}: 0.189 {I21}: 6.75 {I35}: 2.10 {I20} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.088 {I5} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Others: -0.09 {I2} (1973Ka35), -0.02 {I11} (1980Ba19), -0.194 {I21} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M:N=34.0 {I15}: 5.33 {I28}: 1.51 {I9}: 0.485 {I34} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0174 {I18} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Others: -0.030 {I3} (1973Ka35) and 0.047 {I25} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M=11.5 {I24}: 2.58 {I14}: 0.270 {I76}: 0.51 {I13} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=4.05 {I110} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M=27.3 {I15}: 4.39 {I22}: 0.460 {I90}: 1.14 {I14} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=2.66 {I37} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M:N=0.892 {I52}: 0.140 {I30}: 0.045 {I12}: 0.0110 {I29} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.064 {I10} (1972Ma63) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:NO=38.8 {I17}: 6.39 {I35}: 0.035 {I14}: 0.471 {I32} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.054 {I3} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Others: -0.33 {I29} (1980Ba19) and -0.082 {I10} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:M:N=13.5 {I7}: 2.78 {I14}: 0.671 {I36}: 0.206 {I15} (1972Ka30); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0142 {I10} (1972Ma63) 
MR$Others: -0.018 {I3} (1973Ka35) and 0.055 {I20} (1977Mc01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[283.75|g]=0.156 {I68}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[283.75|g]=0.018 {I10} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured {Ice} in 1972Ka30 ce(K)[780.66|g]=0.105 {I36}, theoretical (BRICC) |a(K)[780.66|g]=0.24 {I17} and |a(K)[803.1|g]=0.00803 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.00121 {I6} (1955Ha09), 0.0012 {I1} (1955Ro30), 0.00121 {I8} (1956As46), 0.00122 {I9} (1957Ov09), 0.00132 {I8} (1957Ov09), 0.00115 {I9} (2018Sh12) and 0.00122 {I3} (2023Av04). Others: 0.00180 {I14} (1951Gr15), 0.0016 {I2} (1952Ri14), and 0.0012 {I2} (1956Sh24). Indirect measurements: 0.001059 {I21} and 0.000874 {I47} from I|a(4516.58|a) and |a(tot) in 1958Ba45 and 1999Oh02, respectively 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0081 {I14} (1999Oh02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.06 {I2} and assigned E2 in 1994Po20 
E$Partially contaminated by 516.2-keV line from {+208}Po. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I5}, pol=+0.19 {I25}; J to J transition, based on |g(|q) and linear polarization. |d=-2.2 {I8}, or |d=+0.8 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$W(90|')/W(127|')=0.87 {I9} 
E$Other: 5581.1 keV {I3} (2003En07). Possible branch to the first excited 2+ state coincides with 4778.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Transition into the ground state coincides with a possible branch of the state at 7881 keV. 
$W(90|')/W(127|')=0.63 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$W(90|')/W(127|')=0.87 {I10} 
E$Possible branch to the first excited 2+ state coincides with the transition at 7078 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$In {+206}Bi |e decay, 2.5 units of this I|g should be from the 2864-keV level, thus leaving 4.8 from this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From 1990Tr01. Other: 1166 keV {I3} (1972Ta18,1976Ju03). 
M$ce(K)/ce(L)=5.61 {I38} (1990Tr01) 
$Monopole strength |r=0.026 {I3} (1972Ta18) and 0.034 {I2} (1976Ju03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From 2000He14 in {+207}Bi |e decay 
M$From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, |a(M)exp and subshell ratios in {+207}Bi |e decay; |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (A{-2}=0.186 {I25}; A{-4}=-0.021 {I18} in 1970Kl03) and in {+207}Pb(n,n'|g) (A{-2}=+0.18 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} in 2000Ka07); K/L=3.58 {I5} (1988Fu05), 3.52 {I11} (1973Fr15), 3.31 {I13} (1974Av03), 3.49 {I12} (1969He19), 3.57 (E2 theory). L12/L3=7.4 {I4} (1969He19), 7.25 (E2 theory). K:L:M:N+=1000:279 {I4}:70 {I2}:21.0 {I11} (1988Fu05), 1000:302 {I12}:86 {I6}:18 {I2} (1974Av03), 1000 {I23}:287 {I7}:70 {I4}:20.5 {I18} (1969He19). |a(K)exp=0.0155 {I5} (1969He19), 0.0159 {I6} (1967Va25), both relative to |a(K)(661|g) in {+137}Ba)=0.0890 {I8}. |a=0.0219 {I3} from (ce)(ce) coin (1968An04) 
EKC$ 0.01572 {I23}, weighted average of 0.0156 {I7} (1967Kl02), 0.0159 {I6} (1967Va25), 0.0160 {I10} (1967Se15), 0.0156 {I5} (1968An04), 0.0155 {I5} (1969He19), 0.0160 {I5} [V. Anderson, Riso report 195 (1969)] , and 0.0150 {I15} (1969Ba53). Other: 0.0230 {I3} (1974Mu16) omitted since it is discrepant. 
ELC$ 0.00452 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0049 {I3} (1967Se15), 0.0045 {I5} (1968An04), 0.00444 {I21} (1969He19), 0.0050 {I10} (1969Ba53), 0.00483 {I18} (1974Av03) and 0.00446 {I7} (1988Fu05). 
EMC$ 0.00114 {I5}, weighted average of 0.0010 {I5} (1967Se15), 0.00138 {I10} (1974Av03) and 0.00112 {I3} (1988Fu05) 
EMC+$0.00149 {I4} weighted average of 0.0017 {I5} (1968An04), 0.0017 {I4} (1969Ba53), 0.00167 {I10} (1974Av03) and 0.00146 {I3} (1988Fu05). 
ENC+$0.00029 {I3} (1974Av03) and 0.000341 {I17} (1988Fu05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From 1988Hi14 in {+207}Tl |b{+-} decay 
RI$Weighted average of 0.59 {I9} in Coulomb excitation, 0.53 {I4} in {+207}Tl |b{+-} decay and 0.58 {I19} in {+211}Po |a decay (0.516 s). Other: 0.40 {I10} in {+207}Pb(n,n'|g) 
M$See {+207}Tl |b{+-} decay dataset for details 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From 1988Hi14 in {+207}Tl |b{+-} decay 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0182 {I13}, weighted average of 0.019 {I3} (1970AhZX), 0.0181 {I25} (1974Av03), 0.016 {I3} (1975Ja04), and 0.0190 {I23} (1988Fu05) in {+207}Bi |e decay and 0.016 {I3} (1975Ja04) in {+211}Po |a decay (0.516 s). 
MR$Weighted average of +0.096 {I11} (1970Kl03) and +0.075 25 (1972Ha59) in Coul. Ex and +0.075 {I25} (1976Av01) and +0.11 {I6} (1973Ba38) in {+207}Bi |e decay. |d=-2.19 {I6}, as a second solution in 1970Kl03, would imply almost a pure E2 transition, but this is incompatible with the substantial line Doppler broadening. The sign is from |g|g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^10
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE5;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE5W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
E$From 2000He14 in {+207}Bi |e decay 
M$From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, |a(M)exp and subshell ratios in {+207}Bi |e decay; L12/L3=13 {I2}, M/NO=3.3 {I5},and K:L:M+=1000 {I20}:267 {I8}:83 {I4} (1969He19); K/L=3.83 {I14} (1973Fr15); K:L:M:N+=4740 {I168}:1206 {I46}:296 {I13}:95 {I6} (1988Fu05); K:L:M:N+=4605 {I138}:1089 {I44}:269 {I19}:82 {I11} (1974Av03). 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in {+207}Bi |e decay (1976Av01) 
EKC$ 0.0951 {I23}, weighted average of 0.090 {I9} (1967Kl02), 0.096 {I3} (1969He19), 0.095 {I14} (1969Ba53), 0.094 {I5} (1974Av03), and 0.095 {I11} (1974Mu16). Others: 0.094 {I9} [V. Andersen, Riso report 195 (1969)], 0.099 {I4} (1988Fu05) and 0.085 {I5} (1967Se15) 
ELC$ 0.0247 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0233 {I15} (1967Se15), 0.0256 {I10} (1969He19), 0.030 {I5} (1969Ba53), 0.0225 {I16} (1974Av03), and 0.0251 {I10} (1988Fu05). 
EMC$ 0.0059 {I4}, weighted average of 0.0044 {I9} (1967Se15), 0.0055 {I5} (1974Av03), and 0.0062 {I3} (1988Fu05). 
EMC+$ 0.0105 {I17} (1969Ba53) 
ENC+$ 0.0017 {I3} (1974Av03) and 0.00198 {I13} (1988Fu05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+207}Bi |e decay 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.00244 {I13}, |a(L)exp=0.00042 {I8} and K:L:M+=1000 {I50}:157 {I15}:44 {I7} (1974Av03) in {+207}Bi |e decay; |g(|q) in {+207}Pb(n,n'|g) (a{-2}=+0.35 {I8}; a{-4}=-0.05 {I11} (2000Ka07)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+207}Bi |e decay 
M$ From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M+)exp and subshell ratios; K:L:M+=1000 {I111}:136 {I15}:32 {I5} (1988Fu05); 1000 {I57}:157 {I13}:43 {I5} (1974Av03). K/L=5.5 {I6} (1973Fr15) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+207}Bi |e decay (1976Av01) 
EKC$ 0.00346 {I18}, weighted average of 0.0034 {I3} (1971Al03), 0.0030 {I5} (1974Av03), and 0.00362 {I19} (1988Fu05). 
ELC$ 0.00049 {I8}, unweighted average of 0.00041 {I9} (1974Av03) and 0.00057 {I5} (1988Fu05). 
EMC+$ 0.00013 {I3}, unweighted average of 0.00010 {I2} (1974Av03) and 0.000157 {I1} (1988Fu05). 
IPC$ |a{-|p} = 0.00025 {I5} 1971Al03; M1 theory 0.00027. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+206}Pb(d,p|g). E|g=2612.04 in {+207}Pb(n,n'|g) (2000Ka07) is based on energy levels difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=+0.44 {I7} (1974Sw05). Given J=3/2, this yields |d values -0.10 {I4}, +0.72 {I6}, -1.39 {I10}, or +9.9 {I+52-27}. These rule out the possibility of E1+M2, provided branching(3928|g)>40% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.74 {I11} (1974Sw05) in {+207}Pb(|g,|g'),(pol |g,|g'). Given J=3/2, this yields |d values -0.27 {I7}, 1.01 {I13}, +4.0 {I12}. These rule out the possibility of E1+M2, provided branching(4104|g)>3% 
MR$-0.9 {I4} or +1.2 {I2} from |g(|q) in 2003En07 ({+207}Pb(|g,|g'),(pol |g,|g')) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$569.62 {I12} in 1988Hi14 
RI$From I(|g+ce)(328|g)=I(|g+ce)(570|g). The I|b(570)<8|*10{+-5} (1988Hi14) contribution has been neglected in the intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(328|g)/I|g(898|g)=0.0054 {I5} (1988Hi14). Other: 0.0020 {I2} in 1968Br17 
M$|a(exp)=0.16 {I8} in 1988Hi14 from the determination of the yields of the 328 and 570|g's along with the requirement that I(|g+ce)(328|g)=I(|g+ce)(570|g), with |a(570|g)=0.0218. This value of |a would lead to mult=E2(+M1) with |d>0.86 and large B(E2)(W.u.) value that is difficult to explain for a nucleus close to the doubly-magic {+208}Pb. On the basis of theoretical calculations, 1974Ha34 suggest that |d<0.1. 1988Hi14 also suggest that the E2 component is negligible, and explained the deviation of |a(exp) from theory as most likely due to penetration effect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(898|g)/I|g(351|g)=0.0202 {I7} (1988Hi14) and I|g(351|g in {+211}Bi |a decay)=13.02% {I12}. Note that the authors in 1988Hi14 quoted I(|g+ce)(898|g)=0.263% {I9}, using I|g(351|g)=12.76% with |a taken as 0.022 {I7} (private communication from first author in 1988Hi14, February 1993) leading to the same ratio of I|g(898|g)/I|g(351|g)=0.0202 {I7}. Other: 0.270% {I25} in 1968Br17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC$from experimental conversion coefficients 
E$from 2000He14 evaluation 
RI$from I{-|g}(569) = (100.0-0.131)/[(1.0 + |a(569)]) 
M$ From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp; K/L=3.58 {I5} (1988Fu05), 3.52 {I11} (1973Fr15), 3.31 {I13} (1974Av03), 3.49 {I12} (1969He19), 3.57 (E2 theory). L12/L3=7.4 {I4} (1969He19), 7.25 (E2 theory). K:L:M:N+=1000:279 {I4}:70 {I2}:21.0 {I11} (1988Fu05), 1000:302 {I12}:86 {I6}:18 {I2} (1974Av03), 1000 {I23}:287 {I7}:70 {I4}:20.5 {I18} (1969He19). |a(K)exp=0.0155 {I5} (1969He19), 0.0159 {I6} (1967Va25), both relative to |a(K)(661|g) in {+137}Ba)=0.0890 {I8}. |a=0.0219 {I3} from (ce)(ce) coin (1968An04) 
EKC$ 0.01572 {I23}, weighted average of 0.0156 {I7} (1967Kl02), 0.0159 {I6} (1967Va25), 0.0160 {I10} (1967Se15), 0.0156 {I5} (1968An04), 0.0155 {I5} (1969He19), 0.0160 {I5} [V. Anderson, Riso report 195 (1969)], and 0.0150 {I15} (1969Ba53). Other: 0.0230 {I3} (1974Mu16) omitted since it is discrepant. 
ELC$ 0.00452 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0049 {I3} (1967Se15), 0.0045 {I5} (1968An04), 0.00444 {I21} (1969He19), 0.0050 {I10} (1969Ba53), 0.00483 {I18} (1974Av03) and 0.00446 {I7} (1988Fu05). 
EMC$ 0.00114 {I5}, weighted average of 0.0010 {I5} (1967Se15), 0.00138 {I10} (1974Av03) and 0.00112 {I3} (1988Fu05) 
EMC+$0.00149 {I4} weighted average of 0.0017 {I5} (1968An04), 0.0017 {I4} (1969Ba53), 0.00167 {I10} (1974Av03) and 0.00146 {I3} (1988Fu05). 
ENC+$0.00029 {I3} (1974Av03) and 0.000341 {I17} (1988Fu05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from adopted gammas; E|g=897.8 keV 1 in 1975Ja04. 
RI$from weighted average (LWM) of [I{-|g}(897)/I{-|g}(569)]x100 values of 0.150 {I15} (1969Ra13), 0.14 {I2} (1975Ja04), 0.122 {I13} (1980Yo05), 0.127 {I5} (F. Schima in 1991BaZS, p 134), and 0.153 {I15} (1991Li10). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0182 {I13}, weighted average of 0.019 {I3} (1970AhZX), 0.0181 {I25} (1974Av03), 0.016 {I3} (1975Ja04), and 0.0190 {I23} (1988Fu05). 
MR$ From adopted gammas. |d<0.3 from |a(K)exp 
CC$ From BRICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4+E5
decay_comment:
CC$from experimental conversion coefficients 
E$from 2000He14 
RI$ weighted average of [I{-|g}(1063)/I{-|g}(569)]x100 values of 78.4 {I24} (1967Do09), 74.0 {I20} (1969He19) 78.7 {I40} (1969Ra13), 75.6 {I5} (1972Ro03), 75.5 {I23} (1975Ja04), 77.7 {I5} (1973Wi10), 75.79 {I25} (1980Yo05), 76.5 {I5} (Debertin and Schotzig as quoted in 1991BaZS), 76.6 {I4} (F. Schima in 1991BaZS, p 134), 76.4 {I5} (1990He16), and 77.7 {I14} (1991Li10). 
M$ From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp; L12/L3=13 {I2}, M/NO=3.3 {I5},and K:L:M+=1000 {I20}:267 {I8}:83 {I4} (1969He19); K/L=3.83 {I14} (1973Fr15); K:L:M:N+=4740 {I168}:1206 {I46}:296 {I13}:95 {I6} (1988Fu05); K:L:M:N+=4605 {I138}:1089 {I44}:269 {I19}:82 {I11} (1974Av03). 
MR$from |g|g(|q), as deduced by 1976Av01 using all available data at that time. Others: 1976Ku10, 1980Si17. 1977Ku09 measured A{-2}=+0.259 {I16} (A{-4} is not reported) and deduce |d=+0.12 {I+8-6} 
EKC$ 0.0951 {I23}, weighted average of 0.090 {I9} (1967Kl02), 0.096 {I3} (1969He19), 0.095 {I14} (1969Ba53), 0.094 {I5} (1974Av03), and 0.095 {I11} (1974Mu16). Others: 0.094 {I9} [V. Andersen, Riso report 195 (1969)], 0.099 {I4} (1988Fu05) and 0.085 {I5} (1967Se15) 
ELC$ 0.0247 {I6}, weighted average of 0.0233 {I15} (1967Se15), 0.0256 {I10} (1969He19), 0.030 {I5} (1969Ba53), 0.0225 {I16} (1974Av03), and 0.0251 {I10} (1988Fu05). 
EMC$ 0.0059 {I4}, weighted average of 0.0044 {I9} (1967Se15), 0.0055 {I5} (1974Av03), and 0.0062 {I3} (1988Fu05). 
EMC+$ 0.0105 {I17} (1969Ba53) 
ENC+$ 0.0017 {I3} (1974Av03) and 0.00198 {I13} (1988Fu05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ from 1975Ja04 
RI$weighted average of [I{-|g}(1442)/I{-|g}(569)]x100 values of 0.150 {I15} (1969Ra13), 0.15 {I2} (1975Ja04), 0.132 {I5} (1980Yo05), 0.144 {I24} (1979Si17), 0.1337 {I26} (F. Schima in 1991BaZS, p 134), and 0.147 {I12} (1991Li10). 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.00244 {I13}, |a(L)exp=0.00042 {I8} and K:L:M+=1000 {I50}:157 {I15}:44 {I7} (1974Av03) 
CC$from BRICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$from experimental conversion coefficients 
E$ from 2000He14 
RI$weighted average of [I{-|g}(1770)/I{-|g}(569)]x100 values of 7.1 {I4} (1967Do09), 6.95 {I20} (1975Ja04), 7.03 {I3} (1980Yo05), 7.02 {I7} (F. Schima in 1991BaZS, p 134), and 7.11 {I13} (1991Li10). The weighted average is 7.028 {I26} with an internal uncertainty of 0.026, and a reduced-|h{+2} of 0.14. Other: 7.5 {I4} (1969Ra13) omitted as discrepant. 
M$ From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp; K:L:M+=1000 {I111}:136 {I15}:32 {I5} (1988Fu05); 1000 {I57}:157 {I13}:43 {I5} (1974Av03). K/L=5.5 {I6} (1973Fr15) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) as deduced by 1976Av01 using all available data at that time (1955La32,1973Ba38,1974Ka08,1976Av01) 
EKC$ 0.00346 {I18}, weighted average of 0.0034 {I3} (1971Al03), 0.0030 {I5} (1974Av03), and 0.00362 {I19} (1988Fu05). 
ELC$ 0.00049 {I8}, unweighted average of 0.00041 {I9} (1974Av03) and 0.00057 {I5} (1988Fu05). 
EMC+$ 0.00013 {I3}, unweighted average of 0.00010 {I2} (1974Av03) and 0.000157 {I1} (1988Fu05). 
IPC$ |a{-|p} = 0.00025 {I5} 1971Al03; M1 theory 0.00027. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 104.4 {I20} (1985La17) and 97 {i5} (1975Ja04). 
CC$|a(K)exp=0.016 {I3} (1975Ja04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.44 {I7} (1974Sw05). Given J=3/2, this yields |d values -0.10 {I4}, +0.72 {I6}, -1.39 {I10}, or +9.9 {I+52-27}. These rule out the possibility of E1+M2, provided branching(3928|g)>40% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.74 {I11} (1974Sw05). Given J=3/2, this yields |d values -0.27 {I7}, 1.01 {I13}, +4.0 {I12}. These rule out the possibility of E1+M2, provided branching(4104|g)>3% 
MR$-0.9 {I4} or +1.2 {I2} from |g(|q) in 2003En07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1062.82 in 2000Ka07 based on energy level difference 
M$A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}; A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (2000Ka07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by the evaluators as 100%-I|g(328.1|g) 
M$From A{-2}=-0.127 {I8} in 1970Kl03; 
MR$From adopted gammas. Also |d=-2.19 {I6}, as a second solution of the angular distribution in 1970Kl03, would imply almost a pure E2 transition, but this is incompatible with the substantial line Doppler broadening 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from Adopted Gammas of {+207}Pb in ENSDF database. 2019Ra28 observed a 2067-keV line corresponding to the shifted component of this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
$B(E3)|_(W.u.)=40 {I8} deduced by 2019Ra28 from their measured T{-1/2} assuming a branching of 100%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from E|g(860|g)=E|g(277|g)+E|g(583|g), with recoil corrections taken into account 
M$from |b{+-} decay 
MR$weighted average of +0.008 {I11} from |b{+-} decay, and +0.052 {I45} and +0.038 {I20} from (n,n'|g) +0.038 {I20} (1990Go33) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$from |b{+-} decay 
MR$from |b{+-} decay. Others: -0.021 {I21} (2005YaZW) and +0.015 {I18} (1990Go33) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |b{+-} decay 
MR$weighted average of -0.01 {I6} and -0.16 {I+9-8} from |b{+-} decay, and -0.13 {I7} and -0.21 {I+5-6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$the large solution is <-11, >+10, an unlikely alternative. Other: +0.04 {I3} or -7.8 {I+29-16} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
MR$-0.17 {I8} or +1.3 {I+3-2} 
E$rounded-off value from the level energies. The level energy difference gives E|g=786.791 {I17} (recoil corrected). The value of 786.891 {I10} given in the source dataset, and placed from this level, may Be a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$not observed. E|g is rounded-off from the level energies. See (x,x'|g) for a discussion of this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from the level energies. Reported only in (p,p'|g) where the energies for the two transitions from this level are given as 2320.6 {I2} and 4934.7 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2,E3]
decay_comment:
RI$from (d,p|g). Note, however, that I|g/I|g(2513|g)=0.177 {I13} in (n,n'|g) and 0.14 {I1} in (d,p|g) 
$B(M2)(W.u.)=0.26 {I3} if J|p=2-, and B(E3)(W.u.)=5.2 {I6} if J|p=3- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from the level energies. The measured value from (n,n'|g) is 1069.72 {I4}. Not included in the least-squares fit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,n'|g). I|g/I|g(2294|g)=0.48 {I+19-14} in (d,p|g). The 1572|g is not reported in (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from (|g,|g'). Not seen in (d,p|g). Energy is above the cutoff for transitions reported in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from the level energies. E|g=2211.0 {I5} is reported in (p,p'|g) for what is probably the same level as that seen in (p,p') at 6689.1 {I15} and in (|a,|a') at 6687.4 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|g,|g'). Others: 6718.4 {I3} (p,p'|g), 6716.2 {I4} (d,p|g) 
RI$|G{-|g0}/|G=1.00 {I+0-11} from (|g,|g') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|g,|g'). Others: 7062.1 {I1} (p,p'|g), 7063.4 {I5} (d,p|g). Note that E(level)=7063.4 {I15} in (p,p') and 7064.1 {I6} in (d,p) 
RI$|G{-|g0}/|G=0.98 {I+2-7} from (|g,|g') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from 2000He14 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00217 {I24} (1963Da11), 0.00178 {I12} (1954El07), 0.00183 {I26} (1956Kr57, 1957Vo22). The E3 theory value is 0.001712 
CC$includes internal pair formation. |a=0.00210, |a(IPF)=0.00037 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2000He14 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0152 {I11} (1954El07). |a(K)=0.01511 (E2 theory). Mult=Q is confirmed by |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from the decay scheme (860.557 {I4} - 583.187 {I2}) (corrected for recoil). 1977Ku25 report 277.351 {I10}. A revision upward to 277.359 {I10} is required to account for changes in the energies of the calibration lines used by 1977Ku25. Other: 277.35 {I6} (1952Mu45) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.36 {I4} (1978Av01), and |a(L1)exp=0.075 {I10} (1963Da11). Other: 1957Vo22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1979He10 report 860.564 {I5}. The evaluator has decreased this value by 7 eV to correct for the change in energy of the {+110m}Ag calibration line from 884.6852 {I30} in 1979He10 to 884.6781 {I13} in 2000He14 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0246 {I10} (1978Av01), 0.026 {I4} (1963Da11), and 0.024 (1957Vo22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(L1)exp=0.10 {I2} (1957Vo22) gives |d<0.7, and |a(K)exp=0.45 {I9} (1957Kr56) gives |d=0.9 {I3}. No L2 or L3 lines were seen in the spectrum of 1957Vo22, suggesting mult mainly M1; however, |d=0.6 gives L1:L2:L3=100:27:11, consistent with the non-observation of these lines 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.080 {I4} (1978Av01) and 0.087 {I5} (1963Da11) give |d<0.39 and <0.20, respectively. Other: |a(K)exp=0.082 {I17} (1956Kr57). From |g|g(|q) one gets |d=-0.052 {I45} or -0.68 {I8}. |a(K)exp rules out the larger solution. Note, however, that |d=-0.52 {I+7-5} is reported in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$deduced by the evaluator from I|g and Ice(K) relative to the 4084 E2 transition from a figure in 1984JuZZ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce spectrum (1987Ju06). The authors' energy value of 4866 {I2} has been corrected to 4870 {I3} (private communication to the evaluator from R. Julin, may, 2004) the E0 character is based on observation of strong ce lines with no corresponding photon transition. The data are from (p,p'|g) but the transition was also seen in (d,p|g). K/L=6.4 {I9} (1990Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce spectrum (1987Ju06). The authors' energy value of 5237 {I2} has been corrected to 5241 {I3} (private communication to the evaluator from R. Julin, may, 2004) the E0 character is based on observation of strong ce lines with no corresponding photon transition. The data are from (p,p'|g) but the transition was also seen in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$this transition is missing in 1997Sc21 but is included in 1993ScZQ. Note that the branchings for this level in 1997Sc21 do not add up to 100% without this missing transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from adopted gammas 
E$from E|g(860|g)=E|g(277|g)+E|g(583|g). The authors report 277.368 {I10} 
RI$I|g/I|g(860|g)=0.61 {I4} (1990Go33) 
MR$the large solution is ruled out by ce data in |b{+-} decay. Other: +0.038 {I20} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$calibration value from |b{+-} decay. The authors report 860.545 {I8} 
M$from adopted gammas 
MR$the large solution is ruled out by ce data in |b{+-} decay. Other: +0.015 {I18} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(722|g)=0.80 {I6} (1990Go33) 
M$from adopted gammas 
MR$the large solution is ruled out by ce data in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from adopted gammas 
MR$the large solution is ruled out by ce data in |b{+-} decay. Other: +0.65 {I9} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g:I|g(763|g)=39 {I4}:100 {I3} (1990Go33) 
M$from adopted gammas 
MR$the large solution is ruled out by ce data in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from adopted gammas 
MR$the large solution is ruled out by ce data in |b{+-} decay. Other: -0.13 {I7} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(1381|g)=0.297 {I12} (1990Go33) 
MR$the large solution is +4.4 {I9}, an unlikely alternative 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g:I|g(928|g)=25.3 {I13}:100.0 {I25} (1990Go33) 
MR$-0.05 {I3} or -5.5 {I+8-12}. Other: -0.04 {I4} or -6.0 {I+18-11} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g:I|g(1647|g)=62 {I9}:100 {I4} (1990Go33) 
MR$+0.03 {I4} or -15 {I+5-32}. Other: +0.02 {I6} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g:I|g(1126|g)=16.2 {I16}:100 {I3} (1990Go33) 
E$TRANSITION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEAST-SQUARES FIT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(884|g)=0.36 {I5} (1990Go33) 
MR$+0.19 {I+6-5} or +10 {I+13-3}. Other: +0.30 {I10} or +5.2 {I+46-20} (1990Go33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(1283|g)=0.18 {I5} (1990Go33) 
MR$+0.22 {I+7-6} or +5.2 {I+34-14} 
E$TRANSITION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEAST-SQUARES FIT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_comment:
E$1990Go33 report E|g=1000.51 {I12}. The least-squares adjustment gives E|g=1000.251 {I19} 
E$TRANSITION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEAST-SQUARES FIT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$E|g is from (d,p|g) and I|g is from I|g/I|g(771|g)=0.189 {I35} in (d,p|g). The 327|g is not reported in (n,n'|g), but would perhaps be unresolved from the unplaced 326.17|g with I|g=0.17 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from (d,p|g). 2005YaZW show an unplaced transition with E|g=1275.35 {I8} and I|g=0.040. The energy fit is good; however, the branching is a factor of three higher than in (d,p|g). The evaluator assumes that part of I|g(1275|g) can be placed here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from (d,p|g). In (d,p|g), a transition with this energy is shown defining a level at 5239, separate from the 0+ level at 5241. 2005YaZW show a 2626.5 {I4} transition doubly placed from the 0+ level and from a 6102 level. The 6102 level is not seen in (d,p|g). All three postulated levels decay via a single 2626|g. It is thus possible that part of the 2626|g in (n,n'|g) should be placed from the 5239 level postulated in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$the branching is a factor of about three higher than in (d,p|g) 
E$TRANSITION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEAST-SQUARES FIT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$there is a 1283|g placed from this level in (d,p|g), with I|g/I|g(1837|g)=0.44 {I9}. One thus expects such a transition in (n,n'|g) with E|g=1283.60 {I4} from the level energies, and I|g=0.047 {I10}. There is a 1283.074 {I12} transition with I|g=1.5 {I2} placed from the 4481 level. A small part of that transition may belong here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$there is a 1599|g placed from this level in (d,p|g), with I|g/I|g(1837|g)=0.38 {I8}. One thus expects such a transition in (n,n'|g) with E|g=1598.88 {I4} from the level energies, and I|g=0.041 {I9}. There is an unplaced transition with E|g=1598.34 {I6} and I|g=0.093 {I8}. Part of that transition may belong here 
E$TRANSITION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LEAST-SQUARES FIT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$2005YaZW report an unplaced transition with E|g=1317.99 {I5} and I|g=0.068 {I7}. In (d,p|g) there is a 1317.0 {I10} transition placed from the 5675 level. From I|g(1317|g)/I|g(3060|g)=0.049 {I20} in (d,p|g), one expects I|g=0.015 {I6} for a 1317 transition from the 5675 level in (n,n'|g). The evaluator suggests that part of the 1318|g may belong here. E|g is from the level energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$2005YaZW report a transition with E|g=1413.026 {I13} and I|g=2.0 {I2} placed from the 4611 level. In (d,p|g) there is a 1413.0 {I10} transition placed from the 5675 level. From I|g(1413|g)/I|g(3020|g)= 0.10 {I2} in (d,p|g), one expects I|g=0.031 {I6} for a 1413 transition from the 5675 level in (n,n'|g). Such a transition would be completely masked by the strong 1413.026|g. The evaluator suggests that part of I|g(1413|g) may belong here. E|g is taken by the evaluator from the level energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$2005YaZW report a transition with E|g=1420.24 {I3} and I|g=0.18 {I2} placed from the 5545 level. In (d,p|g) there is a 1420.0 {I10} transition placed from the 5675 level. From I|g(1420|g)/I|g(3020|g)= 0.21 {I5} in (d,p|g), one expects I|g=0.064 {I15} for a 1420 transition from the 5675 level in (n,n'|g). If I|g(1420|g) from the 5545 level is reduced by this amount, the branching from that level will be brought into agreement with (d,p|g). See comment on the 1420|g from the 5545 level. E|g is taken from the level energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D+Q]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$not seen in (d,p|g). E|g gives E(level)=5675.57 {I3}, in disagreement with E(level)=5675.37 {I2} given by the 3060|g 
MR$+0.18 {I10} or >6.7, <-23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (d,p|g). 2005YaZW report E|g=2260.40 {I6}; however, I|g/I|g(2771|g) compared with (d,p|g) suggests that only 25% of I|g(2260|g) belongs here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$unplaced by 2005YaZW. An 1832|g is placed from this level in both (d,p|g) and (p,p'|g). The branching agrees well with values in those two reactions. The energy is somewhat discrepant, however, and is not included in the least-squares fit. The least-squares adjustment gives E|g=1831.39 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from (d,p|g). 2005YaZW report a 2671.983 {I13} placed entirely from the 5286 level. If part of I|g(2672|g) could be placed here, the 6147 level may be populated also in (n,n'|g). E|g is from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$the 3629|g is unplaced in (n,n'|g). In (d,p|g) a 3627.9 {I9} transition defines a level at 6242. This level may also be excited in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$the 3641|g is unplaced in (n,n'|g). In (d,p|g) a 3636 {I5} transition defines a level at 6250. This level may also be excited in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$2005YaZW report an unplaced transition with E|g=2277.7 {I3} and I|g=0.025 {I4}. In (d,p|g) there is a 2278|g placed from this level with I|g/I|g(3660|g)=0.32 {I8}. This compares with 0.54 {I10} in (n,n|g) and suggests that at least part of the 2278|g could be placed from the 6275 level in (n,n'|g). E|g is taken from the level energies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI$cannot be resolved from annihilation radiation. From adopted gammas, E|g=510.72 {I7} and I|g/I|g(233|g+1095|g)=31.9 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$rounded-off value taken by the evaluator from (d,p|g). Value of 439.0 {I1} reported by 1996Ra07 is a poor fit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$rounded-off value taken by the evaluator from (d,p|g). Value of 465.2 {I1} reported by 1996Ra07 is a poor fit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce spectrum (1987Ju06). The authors' energy value of 4866 {I2} has been corrected to 4870 {I3} (private communication to the evaluator from R. Julin, May, 2004) the E0 character is based on observation of strong ce lines with no corresponding photon transition. K/L=6.4 {I9} (1990Tr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Not seen in (p,p'|g). E is from adopted gammas. From a study of (p,p'ce), 2005Or02 deduce an intensity limit of I(|g+ce)/I(|g+ce)(5241 eo transition)<4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from ce spectrum (1987Ju06). The authors' energy value of 5237 {I2} has been corrected to 5241 {I3} (private communication to the evaluator from R. Julin, May, 2004) the E0 character is based on observation of strong ce lines with no corresponding photon transition. 2005Or02 report E=5241.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(2338|g)/I|g(3199|g)=0.85 {I14} in (d,p|g). This suggests that part of the 2338|g belongs elsewhere. In (n,n'|g), a 2338|g is placed from a 4953 level. It is thus possible that this the 4953 level is being populated in (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1976Fr21 report a level at 7316 {I8} in (p,p') and state that there is an indication of ground-state |g strength. The 7316 peak was separated from an {+16}O contaminant in the (p,p') data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(511|g)=0.0136 {I9} in |b{+-} decay suggests that only part of this intensity belongs here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$reported only by 1999AmZX. I|g/I|g(511|g)=0.0175 {I13} in |b{+-} decay suggests that only part of this peak belongs here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$I|g/I|g(763|g)=0.24 {I8} in the {+64}Ni bombardment, and 0.9 {I3} in the {+82}Se bombardment. In |b{+-} decay this ratio is 0.027 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$5.4 {I19}, 7 {I4}, and 16 {I7} from three different bombardments. I|g/I|g(840|g)=0.13 {I5} in (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from E(level) difference. Transition not observed, but is required by observation in a delayed spectrum of the 250|g from the 4860.9 level 
RI,TI$I|g is from I(|g+ce) with |a=1010 (E2 theory). I(|g+ce) is from the requirement of an intensity balance at the 4860.9 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$reported only by 1993ScZQ. The placement is questionable according to the authors; however, the transition is observed and placed from this level in (d,p|g) so the evaluator assigns the level as definite 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The authors place this transition from a 4854.7 level. That level no longer exists. The 771.6|g belongs with the 4480.7 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved transition: upper intensity limit estimated by 2017Br08 in order to compare with the E3 decay of first 8+ state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler. 2017Br08 give 0.052 {I4}, see comment for compiler adjusted transition intensity of 34-keV transition 
E$unobserved transition, its existence deduced from |g|g-coin spectra from levels populated above the 10+ isomer. 
TI$15.7 deduced by 2017Br08 from intensity balance. Compilers obtain 22 {I4} from summed I(|g+ce) of 250.0- and 823.3-keV transitions from 4860.7 level, and 24 {I1} from 100-(summed I(|g+ce) of 284.5- and 857.7-keV transitions from 4895 level), both values in disagreement with 15.7 from 2017Br08. This point was confirmed in e-mail reply of Oct 30, 2017 from R. Broda, where it was mentioned that conversion coefficient for the 250.0|g got left out in the analysis. 
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a(total) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler. 2017Br08 give 0.0047 {I3}, see comment for compiler adjusted transition intensity of 34-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler. 2017Br08 give 0.355 {I25}, see comment for compiler adjusted transition intensity of 34-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$unobserved E3 transition. Upper intensity limit estimated in order to compare with 1508 keV E3 decay rate. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$72 {I4} from {+208}Pb+{+208}Pb, 74 {I7} from {+48}Ca+{+208}Pb, normalized to 100 for 341.3|g from 141016 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$94 {I9} from {+208}Pb+{+208}Pb, 63 {I8} from {+48}Ca+{+208}Pb, normalized to 100 for 341.3|g from 141016 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$44 {I5} from {+208}Pb+{+208}Pb, 52 {I8} from {+48}Ca+{+208}Pb, normalized to 100 for 341.3|g from 141016 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$22 {I5} from {+208}Pb+{+208}Pb, 37 {I7} from {+48}Ca+{+208}Pb, normalized to 100 for 341.3|g from 141016 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I9} (2000Gr35) from {+209}Tl |b{+-} decay is consistent with E2 and possibly with E1, but T{-1/2}(|g to 9/2+) consistent with E2 not E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$465.128 24 from B- decay, 465.3 3 from (N,G), 465 1 from (D,PG) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I4} (2000Gr35) from {+209}Tl |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Note that B(E3)(W.u.)=50 is expected from shell-model calculations and systematics arguments (2000Re12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=99.663 {I7}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 1566.95 {I6} (1977Vy02), 1566.9 {I2} (1981Di14), 1567.11 {I2} (1989Ko26), 1566.96 {I5} (1998Ar03) and 1566.9 {I3} (2000Gr35) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I9} (2000Gr35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=95.4 {I10}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 465.065 {I25} (1977Vy02), 465.1 {I2} (1981Di14), 465.4 {I1} (1986He06), 465.14 {I1} (1989Ko26), 465.10 {I5} (1998Ar03) and 465.21 {I4} (2000Gr35) 
RI$weighted average of 98.5 {I20} (1981Di14), 94.5 {I13} (1986He06), 97 {I4} (1989Ko26), 95 {I5} (1998Ar03), 97 {I5} (2000Gr35) and 95 {I3} (2003ChZV). The value from 1986He06 is deduced from I(465|g)=2.022 {I26} per 100 {+213}Bi decays in 1986He06 and %|a({+213}Bi)=2.140 {I10} in 2013Ma13. Others: 108 {I3} deduced by the evaluators from data in 1977Vy02 
M$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I4} (1998MaZO,2000Gr35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
%I|g=76 {I3}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 117.211 {I21} (1977Vy02), 117.25 {I5} (1981Di14), 117.21 {I1} (1989Ko26), 117.24 {I5} (1998Ar03) and 117.18 {I10} (2000Gr35) 
RI$weighted average of 73 {I4} (1998Ar03) and 78 {I4} (2000Gr35) Others: 90.3 {I22} (1977Vy02), 85 {I3} (1981Di14) and 85 {I4} (1989Ko26), 
M$|a(K)exp=0.25 {I2} (2000Gr35) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.31 {I3}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$from 2000Gr35 
RI$weighted average of 0.28 {I4} from 2000Gr35 and 0.32 {I4} from 2003ChZV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.015 {I5}, using the calculated normalization. 
RI$Others: <0.00064 in 2003ChZV, <0.013 from 2006Va23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.080 {I21}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 748.0 {I3} (1998Ar03) and 748.5 {I3} (2000Gr35). 
RI$weighted average of 0.09 {I3} (1998Ar03) and 0.07 {I3} (2000Gr35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.0284 {I24}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$from 2000Gr35 
RI$weighted average of 0.03 {I1} (2000Gr35) and 0.0284 {I25} (2003ChZV). Other: 0.027 {I12} (2006Va23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.630 {I22}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 920.2 {I3} (1989Ko26), 920.34 {I9} (1998Ar03), and 920.8 {I1} (2000Gr35). 
RI$weighted average of 0.63 {I6} (1989Ko26), 0.70 {I7} (1998Ar03), 0.63 {I5} (2000Gr35) and 0.62 {I3} (2003ChZV). Note, I|g=0.127 {I7} in 2003ChZV is a typo and should read as 0.0127 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.10 {I3}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 1329.3 {I3} (1998Ar03) and 1329.3 {I3} (2000Gr35) 
RI$from 2000Gr35. Others: 0.26 {I5} (1998Ar03) and 0.14 (2003ChZV). Note, that 0.026 {I5} in the table of 1998Ar03 is a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.439 {I17}, using the calculated normalization. 
E$weighted average of 1239.5 {I5} (1989Ko26), 1239.76 {I15} (1998Ar03), and 1239.7 {I2} (2000Gr35). Placement of this |g-ray is based on a 117|g-1239|g coincidence observed in 1998Ar03. 2000Gr35 placed this |g-ray as a transition from a level at 2806 to 1567, based on the observed 1239|g-1567|g coincidence. 1999GrZT assigned this |g-ray from 3271 keV to 2032 keV 
RI$weighted average of 0.42 {I4} (1989Ko26), 0.31 {I12} (1998Ar03), 0.42 {I7} (2000Gr35) and 0.45 {I2} (2003ChZV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1998Ar03. Other: 778.8 keV {I3} (1989Ko26). 
RI$from I|g(778.87 in {+209}Pb)/I|g(440|g {+213}Po)=0.000165 {i15} from the {+213}Bi decay chain (1998Ar03), with the adopted I|g(440|g)=25.94 {i15} per 100 {+213}Bi decays, %|b{+-}({+213}Bi)=97.860 {I10} (2013Ma13) and %|a({+213}Po)=100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
CC$Calculate using |DE=3. For |DE=30, |a is 10 {i110}. 
RI calc from measured I(ce(L))=20 {I4} and |a(L)=10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$12.7 {I8} in 2018Br15 
M$|a{-T}(exp)=6.9 {I5} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.17 {I13} by compilers. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.19 {I13} is reported in 2018Br15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$5.3 {I11} in 2018Br15 
M$|a{-T}(exp)=18 {I4} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.66 {I6} by compilers. B(E2)(W.u.)=0.67 {I7} is reported in 2018Br15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I12} 
$B(E3)(W.u.)=20.3 {I17} by compilers; B(E3)(W.u.)=21 {I2} is reported in 2018Br15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.40 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I13} 
$B(E3)(W.u.)>9.2 by compilers; B(E3)(W.u.)>10 is reported in 2018Br15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition to (6+) level not seen in |g-ray spectra, energy is from difference of 1335 and 1277 levels 
CC$symmetrized from 80 {I+120-40} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ku15 
RI$weighted average of I|a(5985|a to 805 level)=0.0021% {I4} (1962Wa28) and I|g=0.0018% {I3} (1977Ku15). The I|g value is relative to I|g(241|g in {+220}Rn)=3.97% {I4} following |a decay of {+224}Ra in secular equilibrium. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition to (6+) level not seen in |g-ray spectra, energy is from difference of 1335 and 1279 levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$6 counts at 74 keV are associated with the decay of the isomeric level although 2021Do08 indicate that because of small statistics they cannot completely rule out the 74 keV gamma originating from K{-|a2} x rays. 
M$as proposed by 2021Do08, based on Weisskopf estimates. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M2(+E3)]
decay_comment:
M From characteristics of the low energy M2 transitions for isomeric states in this mass region (2002Hu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$The number of 36|g-7435|a coincidences requires small |a(exp) in {+192}At |a decay (11.5 ms) (2006An04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.9 {I1} (2001An11, from number of K-x rays and |g rays in the decay of 357.6-keV isomer, populated in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p4n|g)) 
E$from {+193m}At |a decay (2003Ke08). Other: E|g=357 (2001An11, from recoils-|a-g correlation in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p4n|g), identified by the 357|g-transition having the same excitation function as the 6672 keV |a-line from decay of {+189}Bi, and in coincidence with Bi K-x rays). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
TI$from %IT=17 {i5} (2003Ke08) 
$E3 branch of 17% {I5} from the 187-keV isomer from 2003Ke08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from 2003Ke08, seen in coin with |a particles 
TI$from I|a=98 {I2} per 100 |a decays 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from |a(K)exp=8.7 {I20} (2003Ke08), from I|g and I(K x-ray) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$from 2003Ke08, seen in coin with |a particles 
TI$from I|a=100 per 100 |a decays 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.9 {I1} (2001An11, from number of K-x rays and |g rays from the decay of the isomer populated in {+142}Nd({+52}Cr,p4n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed, |g probably totally converted (2009An11) 
M$M1 is required from the intensity balance (2009An11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed, |g probably totally converted (2009An11); not reported by 2013Ny01 
M$M1 is required from the intensity balance (2009An11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 76.0 {I5} (2009An11) and 76.7 keV {I3} (2013Ny01) 
M$from |a(total)exp=0.4 {I1} in 2009An11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
E$from text of 2009An11. Other: 273 {I1} (2001An11) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.20 {I5} determined from (|g)(K x-ray)-coin (2001An11) gives E2 or M1+E2 with |d|?1.5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 148.7 {I5} from {+195}At |a decay (143 ms) and 148.5 {I5} from ({+86}Kr,4n|g). 
M$from experimental |a{-K}=3.3 {I3} in 143-ms {+195}At |a decay (2003Ke04), and |DJ=1, dipole from angular distribution ratios in both the high-spin reactions (2015Ny02,2004Ni06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)(exp) of |a{-K}=0.61 {I10} in ({+52}Cr,p2n) (2004Ni06) and analogy with heavier Bi isotopes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$This |g ray allows one to deduce the existence of an unknown precursor level, from the half-life of 400 ns {i40} which can be extracted form the observed time differences between recoil implantation and the detection of the 578-keV |g ray. No more precise information regarding the precursor state could be obtained in the experiments by 2004Ni06, whereas isomer decays were not discussed by 2015Ny02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
$Observed in spectra tagged with the 9/2- {+191}Bi g.s. |a decay. 
E$Other: 430 keV (2003NiZZ), 429.1 keV (1999NiZY) 
M$proposed on the basis of the K X ray intensity and in analogy with heavier Bi isotopes (1999NiZY). The relative intensities of K X rays and |g rays yield an estimate of |a{-K}=0.61 {i10}, in reasonable agreement with an M2 assignment (2004Ni06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Placement not adopted: this |g is placed from a 933, (9/2+) level in 2015Ny02. 
M Suggested in 2004Ni06 as having stretched E2 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
R(exp)=0.78 {i7} 
This |g ray placed to feed directly the 430-keV 13/2+ band head, based on intensity arguments, and from systematics of similar transitions in heavier Bi isotopes. 
M Suggested as most probable multipolarity in 2004Ni06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$The 397.6|g is placed from a 1332, (13/2+) level in 2015Ny02 
M Suggested in 2004Ni06 as having stretched E2 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$The 578.0|g is placed from an 1825, (21/2-) level in 2015Ny02 
R(exp)=1.9 {i4} 
This |g ray allows one to deduce the existence of an unknown precursor level, from the half-life of 400 ns {i40} which can be extracted form the observed time differences (2004Ni06,2003NiZZ) between recoil implantation and the detection of the 578-keV |g ray. No more precise information regarding the precursor state could be obtained in the experiments (2004Ni06). 
M Multipolarity suggested by evaluator, based on the measured R(exp)=1.9 {i4} value, and the assumed spin difference between connected states 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$The 482|g is placed from an 1815 (1813 in adopted), (17/2+) level in 2015Ny02. 
M Suggested in 2004Ni06 as having stretched E2 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. The existence of this |g ray has strong support from |a-|a coincidence measurements showing that the 6953-keV |a ray from {+195}At g.s. decay to the (|?242 keV, 1/2+) level in {+191}Bi is in coincidence with the 6308-keV |a ray from the {+191}Bi g.s. decay to the 335-keV (9/2-) level in {+187}Tl. 
M Multipolarity suggested on the basis of the J|p values for the connected levels, and from similar transitions in neighboring nuclei. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
RI Evaluators' (2006Ac01) comment: The intensity of this transition is difficult to determine, because the half-life (153 NS) of the originating level is too long for a reliable measurement in the prompt-|g spectra, and much too short compared to the flight-time in the ^RITU separator (|?1 US), which implies that almost all the 605-keV activity recoiling out of the target will decay in flight. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.053 {I9}. Note: negative POL is inconsistent with E1. Presence of a strong contaminant is a possible reason for the discrepancy (private communication by e-mail between first author and XUNDL compiler - dated November 26, 2015). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
POL=-0.023 {I7} 
M$M1 listed in Table I of 2015He27 is consistent with DCO and POL, but inconsistent with (15/2-) to (11/2-) placement in Figure 2, which implies (E2). First author later opined no multipolarity assignment for this transition (private communication by e-mail between first author and XUNDL compiler). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
POL=-0.076 {I11} 
M$DCO and POL for 394.0+393.4 doublet. |g ray placement from (15/2-) to (11/2-) implies (E2), however, negative POL value not consistent with (E2). 
E$Ordering of the 394.0 - 393.4 |g cascade is not established 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
POL=-0.076 {I11} 
M$DCO and POL for 394.0+393.4 doublet. |g ray placement from (19/2-) to (15/2-) implies (E2), however, negative POL value is inconsistent with (E2). 
E$ordering of the 394.0 - 393.4 |g cascade is not established 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Assigned as E2 in 2015He27; First author later stated that there is insufficient information to determine multipolarity (private communication between first author and XUNDL compiler, dated November 26, 2015). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp/(|a(L+...)exp|a(M+...)exp..)=1.37 {I12} from |g(ce) coin data. Theory: For E2 |a{-K}/(|a{-L}+|a{-M}+..)=1.26 
POL=-0.002 {I1}. Note: negative POL is inconsistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
POL=+0.010 {I1} 
M$Placement (25/2+) to 23/2+ implies (M1), positive POL value is inconsistent with (M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$27/2- to 23/2- transition shown in Table I of 2015He27 should be 29/2+ to 25/2+ as given in level-scheme Figure 2. Confirmed by first author through private communication (e-mail). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$ DCO ratio indicates dipole transition, placement (41/2+ to 37/2+) indicates quadrupole transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 104.5 {I2} from {+198}At |a decay (1.25 s) and 104.6 {I1} from ({+40}Ar,5n|g) 
M$from intensity balance in ({+40}Ar,5n|g) (2020He17), and in {+198}At |a decay (2019Gh11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$see comment for unplaced 6152|a, where another 218|g is possible, suggesting a doublet. Other: 218 {I1} (1992Hu04) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp determined from intensity ratio between K x-rays and 218-keV |g rays (2019Gh11), from which evaluators deduce |d(E2/M1)=1.0 {I6} 
$I(6535|a-218.2|g-coin)=21 {I3} 
$I(6358|a-218.2|g-coin)=100 
$I(6275|a-218.2|g-coin)=39 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$dominant M1 from intensity balance considerations of 181-218 |g cascade (2019Gh11); with possible E2 admixture 
E$other: 181 {I1} (1992Hu04) 
$I(6358|a-181.4|g-coin)=52 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$dominant E2 from intensity balance considerations of 103-382 |g cascade (2019Gh11); with possible M1 admixture 
$I(6275|a-103.4|g-coin)=8 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$dominant M1 from intensity balance considerations of 267-218 |g cascade (2019Gh11); with possible E2 admixture 
$I(6275|a-267.1|g-coin)=26 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)>6.2 from comparison of photon intensity of the feeding 528.6|g from 794 level and 104.6|g 
M$M1 in 2020He17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement of this |g not shown as uncertain in 2020He17, even though the level in authors' Fig. 1 is marked as dotted 
M$(M1+E2) in 2020He17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$DCO listed as 0.8 {I8} in Table 1 of 2020He17 seems a misprint, evaluators assume that it should be 0.80 {I8} 
M$M1 in 2020He17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)>6.2 from comparison of photon intensity of the feeding 528.6|g from 794 level and 104.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement of this |g not shown as uncertain in 2020He17, even though the level in authors' Fig. 1 is marked as dotted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$DCO listed as 0.8 {I8} in Table 1 of 2020He17 seems a misprint, evaluators assume that it should be 0.80 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0534, |a(L)=0.01024, |a=0.0670 if mult=M2; |a(K)=0.01548, |a(L)=0.00482, |a=0.02189 if mult=E3; |a from |a(M2) 
|a(K)exp=0.082 {I15} 
|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.09 {I7}; A{-4}=+0.02 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M dipole from |g(|q) measurements. The 344- and 392-keV stretched dipoles have to be either both E1 or both M1 transitions. The proposed E1 is based on systematics of J|p for 888-, 1323- and 1624-keV levels, and a slight preference for 344-keV E1 by the conversion measurements. 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I7}; A{-4}=+0.2 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Unable to obtain a time gated spectra when gated on this 702 |g which authors think is most likely due to limited statistics 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$Supported by intensity balance with |a{-tot}(M2)=4 {I1} which is in good agreement with calculated value |a{-tot}(M2)=3.73 {I6} (BrIcc v2.3b) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp, |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp data in {+196}Bi IT decay. 
This transition has short-lived (0.6 s) and long-lived (210 s {I20}) components. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
98.7 keV {I4} E- line with T{-1/2}=248 s {I10} and 87 keV {I2} E- line with T{-1/2}=280 s {I100} are good candidates for the L and M conversion lines of the 102 keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)/|a(L3)exp=2.15 {I5} 
M from ce data. 
This transition has short-lived (0.6 s) and long-lived (210 s {I20}) components. 
TI total intensity (1987Va09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from difference between 167-keV level and 158-keV level from 1992Hu04's figure 5, unobserved, E|g=7 keV {I8} (1987Va09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
TI total intensity (1987Va09). 
98.7 keV {I4} E- line with T{-1/2}=248 s {I10} and 87 keV {I2} E- line with T{-1/2}=280 s {I100} are good candidates for the L and M conversion lines of the 102 keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {i3}, favors |DJ=1; but I|g suggest |a(255|g)>|a(160|g) rules out some multipolarity for both. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.10 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {i4}, favors |DJ=1; but I|g suggest |a(255|g)>|a(160|g) rules out some multipolarity for both. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.616, |a(L)=0.1066, |a(M)=0.0251, |a(N+..)=0.00837, |a=0.756 if mult=M1; 
|a(K)=0.0364, |a(L)=0.00635, |a(M)=0.00149, |a(N+..)=0.00048, |a=0.0447 if mult=E1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.19 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
|a(K)=0.0561, |a(L)=0.00953, |a=0.0688 if mult=M1; 
|a(K)=0.00526, |a(L)=0.00084, |a=0.00638 if mult=E1 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Probable doublet since the peak is wide in the gated spectra. No energy or placement is suggested (by 2005Ma51) for the second component. 
M$from measured low photon intensity and DCO. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Probable doublet; |g spectrum gated on 550 transition showed a self-coincidence. No energy or placement is suggested (by 2005Ma51) for the second component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.07 {I16} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=-0.14 {I6} (2014Pa53). A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=624.8 {I5}, I|g=72 {I5} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.54 {I11} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.13 {I7} (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=975.3 {I5} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.61 {I29} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=-0.12 {I8} (2014Pa53) A{-2}=-0.24 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I1} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=989.9 {I5}, I|g=21 {I3} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.84 {I12} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=-0.24 {I6} (2014Pa53) A{-2}=-0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=671.7 {I5}, I|g=59 {I5} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.62 {I14} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.12 {I8} (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=1297 (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.05 {I25} (from 625.8-keV, |DJ=1, M1(+E2) gate) (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=115.8 {I5}, I|g=10 {I4} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.60 {I10} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.19 {I8} (2014Pa53) A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I3} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=787.5 {I5}, I|g=13 {I3} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.53 {I10} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.21 {I6} (2014Pa53) A{-2}=+0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=468.0 {I5}, I|g=20 {I4} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.01 {I25} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=-0.26 {I10} (2014Pa53) A{-2}=-0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=482.4 {I5}, I|g=7.3 {I24} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.91 {I24} (from 625.8-keV, |DJ=1, M1(+E2) gate) (2014Pa53). 
$Other: E|g=106.6 {I5}, I|g=10 {I4} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.98 {I26} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate) (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=109.4 {I5}, I|g=6 {I3} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.81 {I27} (from 975.9-keV, |DJ=2, E2 gate); POL=+0.18 {I5} (2014Pa53). A{-2}=-0.29 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (1996Zh23). 
$Other: E|g=345.3 {I5} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.61 {I12} (from 625.8-keV, |DJ=1, M1(+E2) gate); POL=+0.23 {I8} (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=454.7 {I5}, I|g=8.8 {I21} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.97 {I11} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.20 {I11} (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=500.3 {I5}, I|g=20 {I6} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=242.7 {I5}, I|g=12 {I3} (1996Zh23). This |g placed from a 2465 level in 1996Zh23 is not confirmed by 2014Pa53. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.99 {I10} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.21 {I7} (2014Pa53) A{-2}=-0.31 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=630.5 {I5}, I|g=48 {I5} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.65 {I18} (from 625.8-keV, |DJ=1, M1(+E2) gate) (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=975.3 {I5} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.94 {I26} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate) (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=350.1 {I5}, I|g=10 {I3} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.80 {I30} (from 975.9-keV, |DJ=2, E2 gate); POL=+0.16 {I7} (2014Pa53). A{-2}=-0.28 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1996Zh23). 
$Other: E|g=378.9 {I5}, I|g=31 {I4} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.04 {I26} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=-0.25 {I10} (2014Pa53) 
$Other: E|g=576.0 {I5}, I|g=13 {I3} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=590.4 {I5}, I|g=4.1 {I19} (1996Zh23). This |g placed from a 3821 level in 1996Zh23 is not confirmed by 2014Pa53. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=0.91 {I10} (from 379.1-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=+0.16 {I7} (2014Pa53). A{-2}=-0.17 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I3} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=402.3 {I5}, I|g=19 {I6} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.07 in table I of 2014Pa53 seems too low in comparison to other |D(I|g) in the table; increased to 0.7 by evaluator 
M$DCO=0.98 {I19} (from 345.5-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate) (2014Pa53) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$DCO=1.01 {I20} (from 379.1-keV, |DJ=1, E1 gate); POL=-0.25 {I10} (2014Pa53). A{-2}=-0.33 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1996Zh23) 
$Other: E|g=330.1 {I5}, I|g=15 {I3} (1996Zh23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2,M1)
decay_comment:
$Contributed by both the activities 
EKC$uncertainty of 0.077 in |a(K)exp given by 1985St02 is probably a typographic error and should read 0.0077 
$E|g=845.8 {I1}, I|g=30.0 {I21} (1971Jo19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=245.9 {I2}, I|g=47.6 {I24} (1971Jo19). E|g=246.0 {I6}, I|g=9.0 (1976Ko13) 
$ EKC=0.5 3, K/L AP 5 (1976Ko13) CONSISTENT WITH M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1002.0 {I1}, I|g=86 {I4} (1971Jo19). E|g=1002.0 {I5}, I|g=100 (1976Ko13) 
$|a(K)exp=0.058 given in table iii of 1985St02 seems to be a typographic error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1034.0 {I1}, I|g=100 (1971Jo19). E|g=1034.4 {I5}, I|g=100 (1976Ko13) 
$ EKC=0.013 7 (1976Ko13) CONSISTENT WITH M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=361.6 {I3}, I|g=23.1 {I14} (1971Jo19). E|g=361.6 {I5}, I|g=47.0 (1976Ko13) 
$ EKC=0.04 3, K/L AP 2 (1976Ko13) GIVES E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+193}Ir({+12}C,5n|g) (1972Ha73) 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.09 {I5} in {+193}Ir({+12}C,5n|g) (1972Ha73) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp in 1986Br28 ({+201}Po |e decay (15.50 min)); |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)). 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp in 1986Br28 ({+201}Po |e decay (8.96 min)); |g(|q) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)) and 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) and |a(exp) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)), |g(|q) and DCO in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)). Other: |?0.1 from |g(|q) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) and |a(exp) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)), |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp in 1986Br28 ({+201}Po |e decay (8.96 min)). Note, that |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) implies M1+E2 multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp in 1986Br28 ({+201}Po |e decay (8.96 min)), |g(|q) and |a(exp) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)), |g(|q) and DCO in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) and |a(exp) in 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)), |g(|q) and DCO in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=LT;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Anticipated in the decay of this level by analogy to {+201}Bi and {+205}Bi, and the non-observation of low-energy E|g in the corresponding |g-ray spectra. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. The transition was not observed directly and the existence is based on the |g|g-coincidence relationships in {+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) and 1982Br21 ({+203}Tl(|a,6n|g)) 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1985Pi05 ({+196}Pt({+10}B,5n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Other: |a(K)exp=0.0058 {I11} (1986Br28). Note that |a(K)exp=0.011 {I5} in 1976Ko13 is consistent with M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp<0.066 (1986Br28). Note, that |a(K)exp=0.42 {I30} and K/L=5.7 in 1976Ko13 are consistent with Mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.07 {I6}, A{-4}=0.00 {I9}, but values are inconsistent with the expected Mult=E2 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. The transition was not observed directly and the existence is based on the |g|g-coincidence relationships. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.312 {I15}, A{-4}=0.020 {I25}; DCO=1.42 {I31}. Value may be obscured by unresolved transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. The transition was not observed directly and the existence is based on the observed delayed component for 118.8|g and 736.0|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$This |g ray shows delayed component with T{-1/2}=14 ns {I3} 
M$A{-2}=+0.113 {I14}, A{-4}=0.031 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g (delayed)=88 {I9} 
M$A{-2}=-0.34 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}; |a(exp)=0.15 {I8} from the out-of-beam intensity balance in 1982Br21. 
MR$|?0.03 or |?4.4 from 1982Br21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6}; |a(exp)=11 {I2} from intensity balance considerations in 1982Br21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g (delayed)=97 {I10} 
M$A{-2}=+0.37 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}; |a(exp)=0.03 {I4} deduced from the out-of-beam intensity balance in 1982Br21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g (delayed)=65 {I7} 
M$A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I1}; |a(exp)=0.58 {I6} deduced from the out-of-beam intensity balance in 1982Br21. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$ Corrected for equilibrium in 1986Br28 
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I3} and K/L=3.1 {I4} in 1980Br23, where the 856|g was found to be doublet; Other: |a(K)exp=0.13 {I4} and K/L=2.3 {I4} in 1969Al10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$From K/L=1.75 {I15} in 1986Be07; |a(K)exp=0.152 {I24}, K/L=1.68 {I6} and L/M=4.1 {I4} in 1986Br28; Other: |a(K)exp=0.55 {I25} in 1976Ko13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.079 {I27} in 1986Br28 
CC$From |a(K)exp in 1986Br28 and by assuming 10% contribution from |a(L) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.007 in 1986Br28 allows mult=E1 or E2. The placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.005 in 1986Br28 allows mult=E1 or E2. The placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$From {+206}At |a decay (1963Ho18). |DE|g estimated by the evaluator from the observed E|g= 65.17 keV {I5}, 67.25 keV {I4} and 70.70 keV {I9} in {+202}Po |e decay (1986Va31) 
M$From |a(exp)=5.3 {I13} (1963Ho18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$L{-1}/L{-2}/L{-3}/M/N=100/9.7 {I14}/1.05 {I23}/26 {I3}/8.4 {I12} 
E$Placement from E|a differences in {+206}At |a decay (1981Va29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From 1963Ho18, measured with a NaI detector without giving the uncertainty. 
RI$From 1963Ho18, relative to I|a(5696). 
M$|a(exp)=5.3 {I13} (1963Ho18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.018, A{-2}=-0.55 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) and |a(K)exp=0.021, K/L=4.8, A{-2}=-0.40 {I13}, A{-4}=0.04 {I20} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g). 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0076 {I20} in {+203}Po |e decay (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.006, A{-2}=0.01 {I40}, A{-4}=0.04 {I60} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I2} (1972Al25), |a(K)exp=0.013 {I1}, K/L=5 (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay; Other: |a(K)exp=0.013, K/L=6.5, A{-2}=-0.07 {I10}, A{-4}=0.36 {I15} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0064, K/L|<6, A{-2}=0.25 {I32}, A{-4}=0.004 {I50} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14); A{-2}=+0.21 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.9 {I2} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=1.8 {I3} (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay; |a(L)exp|<0.3, A{-2}=0.1 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.0 {I8} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14). 
MR$From {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From a(K)exp=0.011 {I1} in {+203}Po |e decay (1969Al10). Others: |a(K)exp=0.0019 {I6} in {+203}Po |e decay (1972Al25) and |a(K)exp=0.012, A{-2}=-0.041 {I16}, A{-4}=0.03 {I3} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.49 {I5} (1972Al25), |a(K)exp=0.47 {I4} (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay; |a(L)exp=3.2 in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.8 {I3} (1972Al25), |a(K)exp=0.75 {I6}, K/L=0.3 (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay. Other: A{-2}=0.2 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.0 {I2} and |a(L)exp=0.43, but the latter value is inconsistent with the assigned multipolarity in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.21 {I2} (1972Al25), |a(K)exp=0.18 {I2}, K/L=1.2 (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay. Other: |a(K)exp|<0.43, K/L|?4.3, A{-2}=0.06 {I40}, A{-4}=0.1 {I6} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(240|g)/I|g(1124|g)=0.29 in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.34 in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14). Note, that value is also consistent with Mult=M1+E2 with |d=1.24 {I+20-17}, but the decay scheme requires Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.37, K/L=5.3, A{-2}=-0.25 {I22}, A{-4}=-0.4 {I4} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14); |a(K)exp=0.47, A{-2}=-0.37 {I1} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15). 
MR$From {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) 
RI$From {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.21, A{-2}=-0.26 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15). |a(K)exp=0.26, K/L=6.5, A{-2}=-0.20 {I45}, A{-4}=0.1 {I6} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.21 {I34}, A{-4}=-0.4 {I5}, |a(L)exp=1.2, but the latter value is too high for the proposed multipolarity, in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I20}, |a(L)exp=1.0, but the latter value is too high for the proposed multipolarity, in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.21 {i2} (1972Al25). Other: |a(K)exp=0.18 {i2}, K/L=1.2 (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=1.9 {I2} (1972Al25). Others: |a(K)exp=1.6 {I1}, K/L=5 (1969Al10). All data are from {+203}Po |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.048 {I11} (1972Al25). Others: |a(K)exp=0.034 {I11} (1969Al10). All data from {+203}Po |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.4, K/L|>2, A{-2}=-0.23 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I38} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I8} (1972Al25), |a(K)exp=0.022 {I6} (1969Al10) in {+203}Po |e decay; |a(K)exp=0.01, A{-2}=0.12 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I22} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.16, K/L=5.3, A{-2}=-0.27 {I40}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I7} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14); Other: |a(K)exp=0.066 in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.04, K/L=5.0, A{-2}=-0.16 {I45}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I8} in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14); |a(K)exp=0.034, A{-2}=-0.22 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.005, A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}|?0 in {+203}Tl({+3}He,3n|g) (1982Lo14); |a(K)exp=0.0047, A{-2}=-0.23 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.051 {I8} (1972Al25). Other: |a(K)exp=0.04 {I1} (1969Al10). All data are from {+203}Po |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty estimated by the evaluator 
M$|a(K)exp=0.08, A{-2}=-0.23 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty estimated by the evaluator 
M$|a(K)exp=0.019, A{-2}=-0.23 {I2} in {+203}Tl(|a,4n|g) (1983Hu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. E|g=883.5 keV {i10} in 1969Ho37 
RI$From I|g(883.4|g)/I|g(1091.9|g)=0.11 {i5} in 1969Ho37 and I|g(1091.9|g)=35 {i2} in 1972Al25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From Figure 4 of 1972Al25 
RI$Estimated by the evaluator from Figure 4 of 1972Al25, compared to I|g(743.0|g)=1.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.2 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.0 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.43, but the value is inconsistent with the assigned multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I34}, A{-4}=-0.4 {I5}. |a(L)exp=1.2, but value too high for the proposed multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I20}. |a(L)exp=1.0, but value too high for the proposed multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From 1990Br19. M2/M1=1.7; M3/M1=0.03 {I2}; N1/M1=0.23 {I3}; |d<0.03%. Note that no evidence was found in 1990Br19 for the expected 15.1-keV transition to the 6+ g.s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(181.8|g)/I|g(918.1|g)=0.56 in adopted gammas and I(|g+ce)(181.8|g) + I(|g+ce)(918.1|g)=100. I|g=13 {I2} in 1973Ra22 
M$|a(K)exp=7.2 {I14} (1973Ra22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(181.8|g)/I|g(918.1|g)=0.56 in adopted gammas and I|g(181.8|g)=8.1 
M$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI$From intensity balance, the |g was not seen 
E,M$From 1990Br19. N2/N1=0.13 {I3}; N3/N1=0.006 {I5}; N1/M1=0.21 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI$From intensity balance, the |g was not seen 
E,M$From 1990Br19. M2/M1=1.7; M3/M1=0.03 {I2}; N1/M1=0.23 {I3}. Note, that no evidence was found in 1990Br19 for the expected 15.1 keV crossover transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0322 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0070 {I18}. The K/L ratio favors E1+M2 assignment, but |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp values are also consistent with M1+E2 mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.15, |a(L12)exp=0.013 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.032 {I10}. Note that an M2 admixture is possible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I4} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.023 {I3}, K/L=5.3, A{-2}=-0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} (1982Lo14); |a(K)exp=0.033 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.52 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.53 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I1}, p(90|')=0.11 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.54 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (1983Hu15). 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25 using the BrIccMixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.023, |a(L)exp=0.0043 and |a(M)exp=0.00078 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09; |a(K)exp=0.019 {I2}, K/L=5.3, A{-2}=-0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1982Lo14); 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L in 1972Al25, 1969Al10, 1969Ho37, and |g(|q) in 1983He09 using the BrIccMixing program. The sign is from |g(|q) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0070 (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I7} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.0076, |a(L)exp=0.0016 and |a(M)exp=0.00019 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09; |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I11}, A{-2}=0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1982Lo14); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0082 {I8}, K/L=5.9, A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1} (1982Lo14); |a(K)exp=0.0093 {I11}; A{-2}=0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.29 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1}, p(90|')=0.53 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=4.7 {I4} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=5.6 {I12} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(L)exp=0.69 and |a(M)exp=0.20 (1969Ho37). 
MR$From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and K/L in 1972Al25, 1969Al10 and 1969Ho37, using the BrIccMixing program. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.0 {I2} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=3.1 {I6} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(L)exp=0.54 and |a(M)exp=0.11 (1969Ho37). 
MR$From |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp in 1972Al25 and 1969Ho37, using the BrIccMixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I1} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.012 {I1} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.019, |a(L)exp=0.0032 and |a(M)exp=0.00052 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L in 1972Al25 and 1969Al10, and |g(|q) in 1983He09 using the BrIccMixing program. The sign is from |g(|q) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.34 {I8} (1972Al25) and 0.25 {I15} (1969Al10). 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25 and 1969Al10 using the BrIccMixing program. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.38 {I4}, A{-2}=-0.18 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} (1982Lo14); |a(K)exp=0.42 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I30} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}, p(90|')=-0.32 {I3} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0035 {I5}, A{-2}=0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1982Lo14); A{-2}=0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}, p(90|')=0.66 {I7} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.58 {I6}, K/L=7.2, A{-2}=0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I3} (1982Lo14); |a(L3)/|a(L1)<0.03; A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.007 {I22} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.27 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.33 {I3} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1983Hu15). 
MR$From {+205}Tl(|a,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.007 {I1} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I10} (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.012 (1969Ho37) 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25, 1969Al10 and 1969Ho37, and |g(|q) in 1983He09 using the BrIccMixing program. The sign is from |g(|q) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.19 {I3}, A{-2}=0.3 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1982Lo14); A{-2}=0.29 {I7}, A{-4}=0.04 {I8}, p(90|')=0.32 {I16} (1989By03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.002 {I1} (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I3}, A{-2}=0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=0.11 {I5} (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.097 {I14}, A{-2}=-0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I1} (1982Lo14); |a(L3)/|a(L1)=0.014 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=0.004 {I42} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1983Hu15). 
MR$From 1977Br05 in {+205}Tl(|a,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.04 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I9}, p(90|')=0.40 {I18} (1989By03). The |g(|q) data are inconsistent with a stretched E2 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=2.4 {I7} (1972Al25) and 3.0 {I8} (1969Al10). |g(|q) in 1983He09. 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25 and 1969Al10 using the BrIccMixing program. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.13 {I2} (1972Al25), 0.15 {I2} (1969Al10) and |a(K)exp=0.14 (1969Ho37); |a(K)exp=0.30 {I5} (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=0.03 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.12 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1983Hu15); |a(K)exp=0.130 {I20}, A{-2}=-0.1 {I3}, A{-4}=0.4 {I4} (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.22 {I2} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.25 {I3}(1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.45, |a(L)exp=0.33 and |a(M)exp=0.074 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25 and 1969Al10 using the BrIccMixing program. The sign is from 1983He09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038 {I3} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I3} (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.0035, and |a(L)exp=0.00093 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.44 {I4} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.59 {I6} (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.58, |a(L)exp=0.18, and |a(M)exp=0.035 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25, 1969Al10 and 1969Ho37 using the BrIccMixing program. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0116 {I28}; A{-2}=0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=0.02 {I8} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.34 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.42 {I4} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} (1983Hu15); |a(K)exp<0.05, A{-2}=0.1 {I2}, A{-4}=0.13 {I30} (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0062 {I7}; A{-2}=0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=0.05 {I6} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.54 {I1} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (1983Hu15); |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I8}, A{-2}=0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1982Lo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.004; A{-2}=-0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4}, p(90|')=0.38 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.071 {I15} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I5}, p(90|')=-0.19 {I10} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1983Hu15). 
$B(M2)(W.u.) is a limit, since I|g(23.8|g) is unknown. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.070 {I7}; A{-2}=-0.60 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.45 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}, p(90|')=-0.02 {I1} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.44 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.009 {I2} (1972Al25) and 0.011 {I2} (1969Al10). 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25 using the BrIccMixing program. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I6}; A{-2}=-0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=0.04 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}, p(90|')=0.45 {I4} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.082 {I10}; A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.09 {I3} (1989By03). 
MR$From 1977Br05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5}, p(90|')=0.8 {I4} (1989By03). Note, that the measured A{-2} coefficient is in disagreement with such an assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.023, |a(L)exp=0.0043 and |a(M)exp=0.00078 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L in 1972Al25, 1969Al10, 1969Ho37, and |g(|q) in 1983He09 using the BrIccMixing program. The sign is from |g(|q) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$From the measured Ice=1.9 {I3} for E(ce)=18.7 {I2} keV (22.6 keV ce(M1) line) in 1972Al25, and by assuming a pure M1 transition multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0070 (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.0070 {I7} and K/L=6 (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.0076, |a(L)exp=0.0016 and |a(M)exp=0.00019 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.007 {I1} (1972Al25); |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I10} (1969Al10); |a(K)exp=0.012 (1969Ho37); |g(|q) in 1983He09. 
MR$From |a(K)exp in 1972Al25, 1969Al10 and 1969Ho37, and |g(|q) in 1983He09 using the BrIccMixing program. The sign is from |g(|q) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$From the measured Ice=0.7 {I2} for E(ce)=21.2 {I2} keV (24.9 keV ce(M1)+ce(M2) line) in 1972Al25, and by assuming a pure E1 transition multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Doublet confirmed by |g|g coin. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I3}, K/L=5.3, A{-2}=-0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.033 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.52 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.53 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I1}, p(90|')=0.11 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.54 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (1983Hu15). The sign of |d is negative (figure 3 in 1989By03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0093 {I11}; A{-2}=0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.29 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1}, p(90|')=0.53 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.29 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I30} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}, p(90|')=-0.32 {I3} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}, p(90|')=0.66 {I7} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$The 286ce(K) line shows a delayed time component of T{-1/2}=405 ns {I41} (1977Br05) 
M$|a(L3)/|a(L1)<0.03; A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.007 {I22} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.27 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.33 {I3} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L3)/|a(L1)=0.014 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=0.004 {I42} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.20 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I4} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=0.03 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.12 {I2} (1989By03); A{-2}=-0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0116 {I28}; A{-2}=0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=0.02 {I8} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.34 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.42 {I4} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0062 {I7}; A{-2}=0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=0.05 {I6} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.54 {I1} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.071 {I15} (1977Br05); A{-2}=0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I5}, p(90|')=-0.19 {I10} (1989By03); A{-2}=0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1983Hu15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=0.01 {I7}, p(90|')=-0.20 {I5} (1989By03). The sign of |d is negative (figure 3 in 1989By03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.082 {I10}; A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1977Br05); A{-2}=-0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, p(90|')=-0.09 {I3} (1989By03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.46 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}, p(90|')=-0.19 {I5} (1989By03). The sign of |d is negative (figure 3 in 1989By03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N:O=120 {I5}:5290 {I16}: 4870 {I14}: 40.4 {I36}: 1320 {I40}: 1330 {I30}: 19.9 {I17}: 18.6 {I14}:756 {I31}:208 {I8} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N2:N3:O1:O2:P1=9400 {I80}: 1050 {I20}: 98 {I8}:|<2.7: |<1.9: 2300 {I30}: 245 {I9}:27.6 {I31}:476 {I16}: 32 {I10}: 83 {I29} (1975Ka13). Other: M1:N2:N3:O1:O23:O45P=1.00:0.0285 {I11}:0.00277 {I63}:0.0584 {I17}: 0.00645 {I47}: 0.00933 {I34} (1975Ka13); N1:N2:N3:O1:O23:O45P=1.00:0.116 {I4}:0.0113 {I30}:0.239 {I4}:0.0264 {I18}:0.0381 {I11} (1981Fu06) and O1:O23:O45P=1.00:0.110 {I8}:0.160 {I5} (1981Fu06) 
MR$From M2/M1=0.112 {I3}, M3/M1=0.0105 {I9}, N1/M1=0.245 {I12} (1975Ka13) and N2/N1=0.116 {I4}, N3/N1=0.0113 {I30} (1981Fu06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:M:N:O=54.4 {I25}: 5.5 {I5}: 18.9 {I17}: 2.3 {I8}: 1.9 {I13} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L2/L1=0.101 {I10} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I7} (1978Lo09); Others: K/L=5.4 {I5} (1974Ra25); |a(exp)>3.3 (1973Co30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N:O=101 {I29}: 18.2 {I7}: 2.04 {I17}: 3.91 {I22}: 11.1 {I3}: 0.43 {I16}; |a(K)exp=5.0 {I+9-7} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.18 {I5}, L2/K=0.020 {I6} and M/K=0.039 {I11} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=26 {I3}: 6.0 {I3}: 0.77 {I7}: 0.16 {I7}: 0.79 {I11}: 0.37 {I12}; |a(K)exp=4.7 {I+15-11} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.231 {I29} and L2/K=0.0296 {I24} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M=78 {I5}: 10.5 {I5}: 1.19 {I12}: 0.21 {I7}: 2.81 {I18}; |a(K)exp=3.6 {I+12-7} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.135 {I11} and L2/K=0.0153 {I18} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N=62.9 {I18}: 11.5 {I6}: 1.2 {I4}: 1.29 {I12}: 0.26 {I10}; |a(K)exp=0.49 {I3} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.183{I11}, L2/K=0.0205 {I20} and |a(K)exp=0.49 {I3} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=819 {I21}: 135 {I5}: 15.0 {I22}: 0.78 {I9}: 34.2 {I13}: 10.3 {I5}: 4.15 {I21}; |a(K)exp=0.280 {I+13-12} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1981El07. Other: |d=0.13 {I18} from L1/K=0.165 {I7}, L2/K=0.0183 {I27}, M/K=0.0418 {I19} and |a(K)exp=0.53 {I8} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N:O=74.5 {I23}: 11.6 {I5}: 1.20 {I19}: 2.46 {I20}: 0.39 {I10}: 0.20 {I9}; |a(K)exp=1.5 {I+3-2} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.156 {I8}, L2/K=0.0161 {I26}, M/K=0.0330 {I29} and |a(K)exp=1.5 {I+3-2} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N=33.4 {I12}: 6.4 {I3} :1.81 {I10}: 0.42 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.122 {I10} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.192 {I11} and |a(K)exp=0.122 {I10} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:N=5.7 {I3}: 1.09 {I9}: 0.08 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.21 {I3} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.191 {I19} and |a(K)exp=0.21 {I3} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1=24 {I12}: 2.36 {I17}; |a(K)exp=2.9 {I+4-3} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=2.9 {I+4-3} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:M=15.3 {I6}: 0.47 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.254 {I+21-19} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.254 {I+21-19} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N=5.0 {I3}: 1.07 {I8}: 0.28 {I4}: 0.063 {I23}; |a(K)exp=0.127 {I+13-9} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From M/K=0.056 {I9} and |a(K)exp=0.127 {I+13-9} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L:M=100 {I3}: 19.9 {I7}: 5.06 {I19}; |a(K)exp=0.0289 {I+15-14} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L/K=0.199 {I9} and |a(K)exp=0.0289 {I+15-14} (1975Ka13); Other: -0.056<|d<0.210 from |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=214 {I6}: 37.1 {I13}: 3.87 {I24}: 0.26 {I3}: 10.2 {I4}: 2.72 {I20}; |a(K)exp=0.089 {I4} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |d=-0.16 {I6} using |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 and L1/K=0.173 {I8}, L2/K=0.0181 {I12}, L3/K=0.00121 {I14}, M/K=0.0477 {I23}, N/K=0.0127 {I10} and |a(K)exp=0.089 {I4} (1975Ka13). Sign is from 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:N=4.36 {I17}: 0.91 {I4}: 0.049 {I7}: 0.329 {I22}: 0.077 {I10}; |a(K)exp=0.0081 {I+7-6} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2=21.5 {I11}: 3.33 {I23}: 0.35 {I12}; |a(K)exp=1.41 {I+24-13} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.155 {I13} and |a(K)exp=1.41 {I+24-13} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M:N=19.4 {I7}: 3.27 {I15}: 0.75 {I5}: 0.083 {I22}; |a(K)exp=0.0817 {I+64-59} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.169 {I10}, M/K=0.0387 {I29} and |a(K)exp=0.0817 {I+64-59} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L=8.5 {I3}: 1.5 {I7}; |a(K)exp=0.0181 {I14} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.0181 {I14} (1975Ka13); Other: 0.105|<|d<0.447 from |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M:O=22.3 {I9}: 4.8 {I3}: 0.50 {I21}: 1.02 {I12}: 0.10 {I7}; |a(K)exp=1.52 {I+19-15} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.215 {I16}, M/K=0.046 {I6} and |a(K)exp=1.52 {I+19-15} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L:M:N=80.4 {I24}: 15.4 {I6}: 3.82 {I14}: 1.15 {I15}; |a(K)exp=0.016 {I9} (1975Ka13); Other: -0.076<|d<-0.027 from |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From a level-energy difference. E|g=162.621 keV {I30} in 1975Ka13 
M$K:L1=4.8 {I6}:0.69 {I29} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From a level-energy difference. E|g=1193.89 keV {I16} in 1975Ka13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I+8-5} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From a level energy difference. E|g=124.669 keV {I43} in 1975Ka13 
M$K:L1:L2=2.52 {I58}:0.44 {I9}:0.35 {I19} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=1630 {I40}: 286 {I14}: 32 {I4}: 1.64 {I12}: 64.5 {I23}: 17.3 {I7}: 3.01 {I17}; |a(K)exp=0.464 {I+22-18} (1975Ka13) 
MR$Other: -0.077<|d<0.077 from |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=224 {I7}: 39.4 {I15}: 4.2 {I3}: 0.25 {I5}: 9.5 {I4}: 2.6 {I3}: 0.51 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.346 {I+19-18} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L2/K=0.0188 {I15}, L3/K=0.00112 {I23}, M/K=0.0424 {I22}, N/K=0.0116 {I14}, O/K=0.00228 {I28} and |a(K)exp=0.346 {I+19-18} (1975Ka13); Other: -0.070<|d<0.170 from |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:M=2.95 {I17}: 0.66 {I6}: 0.20 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.125 {I15} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.125 {I15} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=336 {I9}: 60.1 {I19}: 6.07 {I24}: 0.36 {I5}: 15.7 {I6}: 4.99 {I21}; |a(K)exp=0.0916 {I+43-41} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K=0.179 {I7}, L3/K=0.00107 {I15}, M/K=0.0467 {I22}, N/K=0.0149 {I8}, and |a(K)exp=0.346 {I+19-18} (1975Ka13); Other: -0.152<|d<0.152 from |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L:M:N=17.2 {I6}: 3.06 {I12}: 0.75 {I3}: 0.230 {I16}; |a(K)exp=0.0159 {I9} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L/K=0.178 {I8} and |a(K)exp=0.0159 {I9} (1975Ka13), and |d=0.38{I15} using |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1981El07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2=13.9 {I10}: 2.17 {I19}: 0.24 {I8}; |a(K)exp=2.07 {I+55-37} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L1/K(exp)=0.156 {I18} and |a(K)exp=2.07 {I+55-37} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (2012Ci05). Other: A{-2}=-0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.036 {I3} and |d=-0.07 {I1} (1978Lo09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=0.09 {I4} and |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I15} (1978Lo09) and A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (2012Ci05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From A{-2}=-0.34 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} (2012Ci05); Other: A{-2}=-0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=0.25 {I11}, |a(K)exp=0.025 {I6} and |d=-0.01 {I3} (1978Lo09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance by the evaluator 
M$M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N2:N3:O1:O2:P1=9400 {I80}: 1050 {I20}: 98 {I8}:|<2.7: |<1.9: 2300 {I30}: 245 {I9}:27.6 {I31}:476 {I16}: 32 {I10}: 83 {I29} (1975Ka13). Other: M1:N2:N3:O1:O23:O45P=1.00:0.0285 {I11}:0.00277 {I63}:0.0584 {I17}: 0.00645 {I47}: 0.00933 {I34} (1975Ka13); N1:N2:N3:O1:O23:O45P=1.00:0.116 {I4}:0.0113 {I30}:0.239 {I4}:0.0264 {I18}:0.0381 {I11} (1981Fu06) and O1:O23:O45P=1.00:0.110 {I8}:0.160 {I5} (1981Fu06) 
MR$From M2/M1=0.112 {I3}, M3/M1=0.0105 {I9}, N1/M1=0.245 {I12} (1975Ka13) and N2/N1=0.116 {I4}, N3/N1=0.0113 {I30} (1981Fu06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:M:N:O=54.4 {I25}: 5.5 {I5}: 18.9 {I17}: 2.3 {I8}: 1.9 {I13} 
MR$From L2/L1=0.101 {I10} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$K:L1:L2=18 {I3}: 3.1 {I3}: 0.29 {I9} (1975Ka13) 
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured Ice(K) in 1975Ka13 and the theoretical |a(K) for the indicated multipolarity. The normalization was done relative to data for 677.7|g, E2 from 1975Ka13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=819 {I21}: 135 {I5}: 15.0 {I22}: 0.78 {I9}: 34.2 {I13}: 10.3 {I5}: 4.15 {I21}; |a(K)exp=0.280 {I+13-12} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1981El07. Other: 0.13 {I18} from L1/K=0.165 {I7}, L2/K=0.0183 {I27}, M/K=0.0418 {I19} and |a(K)exp=0.53 {I8} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K:L:M=0.50 {I3}:0.073 {I9}: 0.020 {I5}; |a(K)exp=0.033 {I5} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L/K=0.146 {I20}, M/K=0.04 {I1} and |a(K)exp=0.0289 {I+15-14} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$Determined by the evaluator from Ice(L1) in 1975Ka13 and the theoretical |a(L1) for a pure M1 transition. The normalization was done relative to data for 677.7|g, E2 from 1975Ka13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas 
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured Ice(K) in 1975Ka13 and the theoretical |a(K) for the indicated multipolarity. The normalization was done relative to data for 677.7|g, E2 from 1975Ka13 
M$K:L1=4.8 {I6}:0.69 {I29} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$From a level energy difference. E|g=124.669 keV {I43} in 1975Ka13 
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured Ice(K) in 1975Ka13 and the theoretical |a(K) for the indicated multipolarity. The normalization was done relative to data for 677.7|g, E2 from 1975Ka13 
M$K:L1:L2=2.52 {I58}:0.44 {I9}:0.35 {I19} (1975Ka13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L:M:N=17.2 {I6}: 3.06 {I12}: 0.75 {I3}: 0.230 {I16}; |a(K)exp=0.0159 {I9} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L/K=0.178 {I8} and |a(K)exp=0.0159 {I9} (1975Ka13), and |d=0.38{I15} using |g|g(|q) in 1981El07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3=44.2 {I24}: 10.5 {I9}: 18 {I3} (1975Ka13) 
MR$From L2/L1(exp)=0.238 {I24} (1975Ka13) 
RI$Determined by the evaluator from the measured Ice(L1) in 1975Ka13 and the theoretical |a(L1) for the indicated multipolarity. The normalization was done relative to data for 677.7|g, E2 from 1975Ka13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$consistent with I|a(5361|a)=I(|g+ce)(106|g+167|g) from intensity balance measured in |a|g coincidence (1975Ja09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0366 {I16} (1978Sc12) and |a(K)exp=0.061 {I11} (1970As01); also A{-2}=-0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} and |a(K)exp=0.023 {I2} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0332 {I7} and K/L=5.76 {I9} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.036 {I3} (1970As01) 
MR$From A{-2}=0.414 {I8} and A{-4}=0.0048 {I3} in (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.4 {I2} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.20 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.004 {I2} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.55 {I3}, K/L=5.52 {I10} and L/M+=3.5 {I8} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.59 {I5} (1970As01) 
MR$pure M1 from L12/L3 (1958Ar56); <0.02 from A{-2}=-0.376 {I9} and A{-4}=-0.0002 {I5} using |g(|q,t) in 1983He09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0164, K/L=5.94 {I9}, and L/M+=3.1 {I8} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.016 {I1} (1970As01) 
MR$From A{-2}=-0.005 {I4} and A{-4}=0.0012 using |g(|q,t) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.168, K/L=5.56 {I8} and L/M+=3.3 {I6} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.18 {I2} (1970As01) 
MR$<0.01 from A{-2}=0.069 {I6} and A{-4}=0 using |g(|q,t) in 1983He09; <0.055 from L12/L3 (1958Ar56) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00394 {I10}, K/L=5.13 {I21} and L/M+=4.0 {I7} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I7} (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$using Ice(K)=0.20 (1958Ar56), one may expect I|g=1.8 if M1, and 8.1 if E2 in {+207}Po |e decay. However, the non-observation in the photon spectrum suggests mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From A{-2}=0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} using |g(|q); |a(K)exp=0.031 {I2} from {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} using |g(|q); |a(K)exp=0.12 {I1} from {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$From K/L=5.5 {I9} (1958Ar56) and L12/L3|>15 (1958Ar56) lead to |d<0.62 and |d|<0.5, respectively; |a(K)exp=0.44 {I7} from Ice(K)=5.2 {I8} in 1958Ar56 and I|g=11.7 {I6} (1978Sc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0536 {I19}, K/L=5.8 {I3} and L/M+=2.9 {I6} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.055 {I8} (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp. L12/L3|>30 (1958Ar56) and K/L=5.8 {I3} (1958Ar56) lead to |d<0.97 and <0.76, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.002 {I1} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.338 {I11} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.39 {I4} (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.338 {I11}. L12/L3|>18 (1958Ar56) and K/L=5.6 {I6} (1958Ar56) lead to |d<0.65 and <0.63, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.071 {I4}, K/L=5.2 {I6} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.049 {I24} (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.071 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.018 {I3} (1989Sc12). K/L1=3.2 {I6} (1958Ar56) and K/L=4.44 {I21} (1978Sc12) are inconsistent with M1(+E2) (6.0 and 5.96 for M1, and 6.8 and 4.90 for E2, respectively). Other: |a(K)exp=0.022 {I2} (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0240 {I15}, K/L=6.9 {I15} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp>0.018 (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.0240 {I15}; K/L=6.9 {I15} (1978Sc12) gives |d<1.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.00245 {I7} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I2} (1970As01); |d<0.01 from A{-2}=0.0722 {I19} and A{-4}=0 using |g(|q,t) in 1983He09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} in |g(|q) and |a(K)exp=0.067 {I6} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.012 {I4} in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 
MR$From |g(|q) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.241 {I6}, K/L=4.85 {I7} and L/M+=3.3 {I6} (1978Sc12); |a(K)exp=0.31 {I3} (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.241 {I6}. L12/L3|>90 (1958Ar56) gives |d<0.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I6} (1979Lo04) in {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From A{-2}=-0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} using |g(|q); |a(K)exp=0.014 {I5} (1979Lo04); data from {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$From A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I7} using |g(|q); |a(K)exp=0.024 {I12} (1979Lo04); data from {+205}Tl(|a,2n|g),{+208}Pb(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(delayed)=3 (1978Lo12) and 8 {I5} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=0.08 {I6} 
RI$From unweighted average of I|g/I|g(571|g)=0.17 (1978Lo12 prompt spectrum) and 0.12 (1978Lo12 delayed spectrum). Note that I|g/I|g(571|g)=0.56 {I14} in 1969Be47 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$The value I|g=21 of 1978Lo12 (from I|g/I|g(669|g)=0.35) is inconsistent with spectra of 1972Ma24 and 1979Lo04. The authors' value may be a misprint. A ratio of 0.55 would give good agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0366 {I16} (Ice(K)=1.39 {I2}) (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.061 {I11} (Ice(K)=1.7 {I2} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0332 {I7} (Ice(K)=56.50 {I7}) and K/L=5.76 {I9} (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.036 {I3} (Ice(K)=59 {I5} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From A{-2}=0.414 {I8} and A{-4}=0.0048 {I3} in |g(|q, t) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0121 {I7} (Ice(K)=0.26 {I1}) (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3} (Ice(K)=0.26 {I5} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.55 {I3} (Ice(K)=53.23 {I12}); K/L=5.52 {I10}; L/M+=3.5 {I8} (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.59 {I5} (Ice(K)=53 {I3} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$pure M1 from L12/L3 (1958Ar56); <0.02 from A{-2}=-0.376 {I9} and A{-4}=-0.0002 {I5} using |g(|q,t) in 1983He09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0164 (Ice(K)=54.29 {I6}); K/L=5.94 {I9}; L/M+=3.1 {I8} (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.016 {I1} (Ice(K)=54 {I4} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From A{-2}=-0.005 {I4} and A{-4}=0.0012 using |g(|q,t) (1983He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(K)=7.2 {I7} (1958Ar56) and |a 
M,MR$K/L=5.8 {I6} (1958Ar56). K/L determines mult=E1 or M1(+E2). If E1, then I|g=63 and such a |g-ray would be a prominent line in the spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.168 (Ice(K)=100); K/L=5.56 {I8}; L/M+=3.3 {I6} (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.18 {I2} (Ice(K)=100 in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$<0.01 from A{-2}=0.069 {I6} and A{-4}=0 using |g(|q,t) in 1983He09; <0.055 from L12/L3 (1958Ar56) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00394 {I10} (Ice(K)=1.37 {I1}); K/L=5.13 {I21}; L/M+=4.0 {I7} (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I7} (Ice(K)=1.50 {I15} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(K)=0.20 (1958Ar56), I|g=1.8 if M1, and 8.1 if E2. Non observation in the photon spectrum suggests mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 7.4 {I12} (1971Sh22), <7 (1970As01) 
M$|a(K)exp>0.016 (Ice(K)=0.13 {I2} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01), compared with 0.0097 (M1); E0 admixtures are possible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I14} (Ice(K)=0.24 {I4}) (1978Sc12). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0066 {I10} (Ice(K)=0.23 {I3} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$From K/L=5.5 {I9} (1958Ar56) and L12/L3|>15 (1958Ar56) lead to |d<0.62 and |d|<0.5, respectively; |a(K)exp=0.44 {I7} from Ice(K)=5.2 {I8} in 1958Ar56 and I|g=11.7 {I6} (1978Sc12); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0536 {I19} (Ice(K)=4.32 {I4}); K/L=5.8 {I3}; L/M+=2.9 {I6} (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.055 {I8} (Ice(K)=4.5 {I5} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp. L12/L3|>30 (1958Ar56) and K/L=5.8 {I3} (1958Ar56) lead to |d<0.97 and <0.76, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I6} (Ice(K)=0.26 {I4}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I4} (Ice(K)=0.25 {I3} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.338 {I11} (Ice(K)=12.23 {I5}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.39 {I4} (Ice(K)=14 {I1} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp. L12/L3|>18 (1958Ar56) and K/L=5.6 {I6} (1958Ar56) lead to |d<0.65 and <0.63, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.071 {I4} (Ice(K)=1.47 {I5}); K/L=5.2 {I6} (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.049 {I24} (Ice(K)=1.6 {I3} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.265 {I13} (Ice(K)=3.81 {I5}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.32 {I6} (Ice(K)=4.2 {I5} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.018 {I3} (Ice(K)=1.24 {I16}) (1989Sc12). K/L1=3.2 {I6} (1958Ar56) and K/L=4.44 {I21} (1978Sc12) are inconsistent with M1(+E2) (6.0 and 5.96 for M1, and 6.8 and 4.90 for E2, respectively). Other: |a(K)exp=0.022 {I2} (Ice(K)=1.3 {I1} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Others: <35 (1970As01), 46 {I6} (1971Sh22). The value of 1971Sh22 leads to |d>1.9, in disagreement with K/L 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0240 {I15} (Ice(K)=0.55 {I2}); K/L=6.9 {I15} (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp>0.018 (Ice(K)=0.74 {I10} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp; K/L=6.9 {I15} (1978Sc12) gives |d<1.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0019 {I3} (Ice(K)=0.024 {I6}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.0019 {I5} (Ice(K)=0.027 {I5} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.37 {I4} (Ice(K)=11.5 {I1} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp. K/L=0.75 {I8} (1958Ar56) gives |d|?4.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0206 {I17} (Ice(K)=1.37 {I8}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(L1)exp=0.005 (Ice(L1)=0.3 in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.016 {I3} (Ice(K)=1.7 {I3} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01); Note that M1/E2 assigned in 1978Sc12, based on |a(K)exp=0.139 {I8} (Ice(K)=1.37 {I8}) (1978Sc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I3} (Ice(K)=0.44 {I2}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I8} (Ice(K)=0.48 {I8} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.00245 {I7} (Ice(K)=2.49 {I2}) (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I2} (Ice(K)=2.6 {I2} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$<0.01 from A{-2}=0.0722 {I19} and A{-4}=0 using |g(|q,t) in 1983He09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
RI,M$|a(K)exp>0.0026 (1958Ar56) is consistent with mult=E2 (|a(K)=0.0034); however, the transition is placed from (3/2)+ to 7/2-. Ice(K)|?0.013 (1958Ar56) leads to I|g=0.72 (M2) and 1.9 (E3). Note that 1970As01 report I|g<5.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I4} (Ice(K)=0.18 {I2}) (1978Sc12) is consistent with mult=M1 (0.0025), or E3 (0.0029). The |g is placed from (3/2)+ to 9/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.241 {I6} (Ice(K)=29.57 {I6}); K/L=4.85 {I7}; L/M+=3.3 {I6} (1978Sc12); Other: |a(K)exp=0.31 {I3} (Ice(K)=34 {I3} in 1958Ar56) (1970As01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp. L12/L3|>90 (1958Ar56) gives |d<0.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=669.0 {I1} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=100 (1978Lo12,1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=-0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.023 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=261.7 {I1} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=33 (1978Lo12) and 37 {I5} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.4 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=931.2 {I10} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=43 (1978Lo12) and 47 {I5} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=0.20 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.004 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=571.2 {I1} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=25 (1978Lo12) and 26 {I3} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.031 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=426.2 {I1} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=22 (1978Lo12) and 23 {I3} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.12 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=937.1 {I10} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$Line in |g spectrum in 1978Lo12 is admixed with a {+19}F impurity line. 
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.002 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$E|g=712.9 {I1} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=63 (1978Lo12) and 63 {I7} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(delayed)=13 (1978Lo12) and 11 {I3} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$E|g=456.2 {I1} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=73 (1978Lo12) and 79 {I8} (1969Be47) 
M$A{-2}=0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.067 {I6}. 
MR$0.01 {I3} in 1978Lo12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$E|g=743.7 {I2} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
RI$I|g(delayed)=34 (1978Lo12) and 60 {I6} (1969Be47) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I3}. Angular distributions were isotropic 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$E|g=823.2 {I5} from E(ce(K)) in 1978Lo12 
M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.012 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=499.9 {I7} from E(ce(K)) in 1979Lo04 
M$A{-2}=0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I6} (1979Lo04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=899.9 {I9} from E(ce(K)) in 1979Lo04 
M$A{-2}=-0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6}; |a(K)exp=0.014 {I5} (1979Lo04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$E|g=388.3 {I8} from E(ce(K)) in 1979Lo04 
M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I7}; |a(K)exp=0.024 {I12} (1979Lo04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 62.94 {I5} from 0.119-s {+212}At(|a), 63.13 {I10} from {+208}Po |e decay, and 63.1 {I1} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from I|g/I|g(570|g)=0.024 {I6} in (p,n|g), and I(|g+ce)/I|g(570|g)=1.23 {I10} in |e decay one gets |a=52 {I+18-12}. This gives mult=M1(+E2) with |d<0.10 and a symmetrized |a of 62 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=2.3 {I11} is reported in |e decay; however, the transition is not seen in (p,n|g) where the adopted limit is reported 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from the E(level) difference. E|g=208 is reported in (d,t|g) 
RI$I|g/I|g(1095|g)=0.02 {I1} is reported in (d,t|g). In (p,n|g) 1971Pr02 report a ratio of <0.06, and 2006Bo08 do not see the transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed, but required by coincidence data in {+208}Pb({+48}Ca,X|g). The energy is from the E(level) difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
M,MR,CC$from adopted gammas 
TI$from an intensity balance at the 64.1 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=3.2 {I8} from K| x ray/|g (1968Bo23) gives |d<0.62, |a(exp)=4.1 {I10} from scin |S|g/|g (1967Hi08) gives |d<0.34, K/L=6.3 {I15} (1968Bo23) gives |d<0.34, and |a(exp)=4.4 {I+11-7} from the requirement of an intensity balance at the 650 level gives |d<0.33 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$K/L=3.6 {I12} (1968Bo23) gives |d(E2/M1)>1.8. Placement in the decay scheme rules out an M1 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I6} (1968Bo23) gives mult=E3(+M4) with |d<0.25. From the recommended upper limit of 10 for the |g-ray strength, one gets |d<0.05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from the requirement of an intensity balance at the 63 level, I(|g+ce)=124 {I5}. With the adopted I|g this yields |d<0.14 and |a=7.8 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from the requirement that I(|g+ce)(291|g)=I(|g+ce)(539|g+570|g+601 |g) one gets |a(291|g)=0.41 {I6} and thus mult=M1+E2 with |d=0.57 {I26}. 1966Ha29 report K/LM=6.5 {I9}; however, that value does not agree with either M1 (4.68) or E2 (1.23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1982Lo01 in a {+212}At source containing both the 0.314 s 0.119 s |a decays. Other: 63 keV (1963Jo09), observed T{-1/2}=0.13 s. 
RI$if |g is M1 then I|g=7.6 {I3} 
TI$from I|a and {+208}Bi level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=30.9 {ILE} 
TI$1971Pr02 report I|g|<29.5 {I14}. The transition is not completely resolved from the annihilation radiation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.3 {I1} 
E$from 1971Pr02. The transition is not seen by 2006Bo08. Note that this transition is reported in (d,t|g) with I|g/I|g(886|g)=0.08 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.1 {ILT} 
E$rounded-off value from the level energy. The transition is not seen by 1971Pr02 or by 2006Bo08, but is reported in |e decay with I|g/I|g(292|g)=0.023 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.4 {I1} 
TI$1971Pr02 report E|g=400.2 {I3} with I|g=0.4 {I1} doubly placed from the 1033 and 1469 levels. The placement from the 1469 level is not confirmed by 2006Bo08. The evaluator assigns all the intensity of 1971Pr02 to the 1033 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.3 {ILT} 
E$rounded-off value from the level energy. The transition is not seen by 1971Pr02 or by 2006Bo08, but is reported in (d,t|g) with I|g/I|g(1095|g)=0.02 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.3 {I2} 
TI$I|g/I|g(959|g)>0.20 from 1971Pr02 compared with 0.09 {I6} from 2006Bo08. It follows that not all of the intensity of the 841|g reported by 1971Pr02 can be placed with the 1469 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=92.6 {I22} 
TI$a comparison of branchings from the 1539 level reported by 1971Pr02 suggests that about 10% of their I|g(906|g) belongs elsewhere 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=9.3 {I4} 
TI$1971Pr02 report E|g=1476.5 {I1} with I|g=9.3 {I4} doubly placed from the 1539 level and a 2401 level. The 2401 level is not confirmed by 2006Bo08. The evaluator assigns all the intensity of 1971Pr02 to placement from the 1539 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.0 {I2} 
TI$I|g/I|g(1640|g)=0.28 {I2} from 1971Pr02 compared with 0.06 {I4} from 2006Bo08 suggests that only part of I|g from 1971Pr02 should be placed from the 1703 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.6 {I3} 
TI$1971Pr02 report E|g=744.3 {I3} with I|g=2.6 {I3} doubly placed from the 1703 level and a 2308 level. The 2308 level is not confirmed by 2006Bo08. The evaluator assigns all the intensity of 1971Pr02 to placement from the 1703 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=9.6 {I5} 
TI$1971Pr02 report E|g=877.2 {I2} with I|g=9.6 {I5} doubly placed from the 1802 level and an 1836 level. The 1836 level is not confirmed by 2006Bo08. The evaluator assigns all the intensity of 1971Pr02 to placement from the 1802 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.1 {I1} 
TI$placed by 1971Pr02 from the 936 level. This placement is not confirmed by 2006Bo08 who place the 307|g from the 1870 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.0 {I2} 
TI$I|g/I|g(1191|g)=0.21 {I2} from 1971Pr02 compared with 0.137 {I15} from 2006Bo08 suggests that only about 70% of the I|g from 1971Pr02 belongs with the 2127 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.8 {I1} 
TI$1971Pr02 report E|g=1292.7 {I3} with I|g=0.8 {I1} placed from the 1920 level. This placement is not confirmed by 2006Bo08 who place the 1293|g from the 2179 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI$1971Pr02 report an unplaced transition with E|g=125.4 {I2}. They do not report an I|g value from their 8-MeV spectrum. From their 10.5-MeV spectrum one gets I|g/I|g(663|g)=4.1 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.5 {I1} 
TI$I|g/I|g(1824|g + 1856|g)=0.086 {I18} compared with 0.038 {I10} from 2006Bo08 suggests that about only about 45% of the I|g of 1971Pr02 should be placed from the 2457 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.0 {I2} 
TI$1971Pr02 report an unplaced transition with E|g=1857.0 {I2} and I|g=3.0 {I2}. From branching in 2006Bo08 one expects I|g=2.0 {I3}, so part of the intensity reported by 1971Pr02 belongs elsewhere 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.6 {I2} 
TI$from branching in 2006Bo08, one expects I|g=1.0 {I4} for 1971Pr02, so part of the intensity of 1971Pr02 belongs elsewhere 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.2 {I1} 
TI$1971Pr02 report E|g=1444.2 {I2} with I|g=1.2 {I1} placed from the 2077 level. This placement is not confirmed by 2006Bo08 who place the transition from the 2513 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$from |a=0.8 {I2} determined from the requirement of an intensity balance at the 3449 level in |g|g coincidence work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed, but required by coincidences between the 1929|g and transitions feeding the 3601 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0170 {I5} in {+209}Po |e decay. Sign is from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation. Other: |d=-0.95 {I25} from Coulomb excitation (1973Kr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.47 {I2} (1978Be17) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) and A{-2}=+0.42 {I1} (1983Ma15) in (t,2n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1978Be17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1546.47 {I5} in (t,2n|g), 1546.7 {I1} in (n,n'|g) and 1546.2 {I5} in (d,n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0054 {I14} in (d,n|g) (1978El07), |g(|q) is isotropic from (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=AP
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15). Transition not seen directly. Energy from level energy difference and total intensity inferred from |g|g to be |?20% of the branching from the 2493 level 
M$from J|p difference and RUL. B(E2)(W.u.)(49.94|g) would be 710 if mult were pure E2. This is an unreasonably large value for this mass region 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.25 {I3} (1983Ma15) in (t,2n|g). 
MR$From the Adopted half-life of 0.015 ps {I3} and B(E3)=0.073 {I11}, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$In (n,n'|g), the 30 {I1} from 1984Pr08 appears to be an outlier and in weighted average, 46.8 {I18} from 2008Mi01 in (n,n'|g) is used. 
M,MR$A{-2}=+0.20 {I5} (1983Ma15) in (t,2n|g). 
MR$From the Adopted half-life of 0.31 ps {I10} and B(E3)=0.067 {I4}, weighted average of 0.065 {I10} from Coulomb excitation (1969He07) and 0.067 {I4} (1968Zi02). Note, that B(E3)=0.67 {I4} is quoted in 1968Zi02, which is a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$(D) from |g(|q) in (t,2n|g). 
MR$from the adopted T{-1/2} of 36 fs {I10} and B(E3)=0.078 {I12} from Coulomb excitation (1969He07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.27 {I4} in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1978Be17), A{-2}=+0.27 {I2} in (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15). 
MR$from 1978Be17 in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) based on a comparison of the experimental B(E2) for each |d solution with the value from a weak-coupling calculation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2+E3)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI,M$from a comparison of B(E3)(2601 level) in Coulomb excitation, and the adopted T{-1/2} value, along with I|g(2601|g)/I|g(992|g)<0.018 from (t,2n|g) and |D|p=yes (from level scheme), one gets branching(2601|g)=1.3% {I5} and mult(2601|g)=(M2+E3) with |d>0.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(exp)=4.1 {i3} based on I(|g+ce)(140|g)/I|g(1132+2741|g's)= 0.356 {i22} in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1978Be17) and relative I|g data in (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1978Be17) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q) in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1978Be17), +0.05 from (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Reported only in (n,n'|g). There is a peak at about this energy in the (t,2n|g) spectrum, and the evaluators estimate I|g/I|g(324|g)|?0.08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 33 {I9} from (t,2n|g), and 48 {I4} (1984Pr08) and 37.1 {I19} (2008Mi01) from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition not observed. E|g from energy level difference. Branching<3% is reported in (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$reported only in (n,n'|g) although there is a possible indication of a peak at this energy in (t,2n|g). From the (t,2n|g) spectrum, the evaluator estimates I|g<22 relative to I|g(463|g)=100 The energy expected from the level scheme is 2955.87 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.26 {I3} in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1978Be17), A{-2}=+0.31 {I5} in (t,2n|g) (1983Ma15), T{-1/2} rules out M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition not observed. E|g from level energy difference. Branching limit reported in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) (1978Be17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 242.73 {I5} in (t,2n|g) and 242.7 {I1} in ({+3}He,d|g) 
RI$weighted average of 92 {I12} in (t,2n|g) and 55 {I20} in ({+3}He,d|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I10} (1983Ma15) in (t,2n|g) 
E$weighted average of 314.2 {I2} in (t,2n|g) and 314.2 {I2} in ({+3}He,d|g) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I13} in (t,2n|g) and 100 {I10} in ({+3}He,d|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 392.56 {I10} in (t,2n|g) and 39.5 {I2} in ({+3}He,d|g) 
RI$weighted average of 72 {I5} in (t,2n|g) and 40 {I10} in ({+3}He,d|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$also placed from 3579 level. Component from 3269 established on the basis of |g|g. 
M$A{-2}=+0.14 {I3} (1983Ma15) in (t,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,n'|g). The 3310|g is not reported in (t,2n|g); however, there is a peak at this energy in the (t,2n|g) spectrum in 1983Ma15, with I|g/I|g(2414|g) estimated by evaluators as |?0.5. The energy expected from the level scheme is 3311.15 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2553.9 {I6} in (t,2n|g), 2552.8 {I2} in ({+3}He,d|g) and 2554.0 {I2} in (n,n'|g) 
M$A{-2}=+0.10 {I17} (1983Ma15) in (t,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$reported only in (n,n'|g). Branching is too weak to be seen in the (t,2n|g) spectrum. The energy expected from the level scheme is 3541.61 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI$also placed from the 3270 level. Total intensity of the doublet is 126 {I4} relative to I|g(592.2)=100 as upper limit. Component from 3579 is established on the basis of |g|g. The measured energy of the multiplet is 424.49 {I8}. E|g is from the level energy difference. A comparison of this value with the measured energy suggests that the dominant component of the 424 multiplet is from a placement other than the 3579 level (evaluators) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (t,2n|g). E|g=3702.3 {I1} is reported in (n,n'|g), but this value is inconsistent with E(level) deduced from the 664.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2887.3 {I4} in (t,2n|g), 2886.3 {I3} in ({+3}He,d|g) and 2886.8 {I1} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$M1 or E3 from |a(K)(exp)=0.0054 {I14}, deduced from I(ce(K))/I(|g) relative to the 1566|g (in {+209}Pb from (d,p|g)) and the 1608|g, both known to be M2. M1 is ruled out by the long half-life. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$from 1983Ma15.Transition not seen directly. Energy from level energy difference and total intensity inferred from |g|g to be |?20% of the branching from the 2493 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference 
RI$transition not observed. Intensity is limit based on possible component in the 992.34 peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference 
RI$transition not observed. Intensity is limit based on possible component in the 2599.9 peak 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not seen. E|g is from the level energy difference. The authors quote an upper limit of 3% for the branching to the 2443 level (value given in text in 1983Ma15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.47 {I2} (1978Be17) 
MR$alternate solution of +2.2 {I8} is ruled out since T{-1/2}(1609|g) deduced from B(E3) with this |d is inconsistent with the spin-rotation pattern of the 1609|g (1978Be17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$assigned by 1972Ha59 as deexciting a level at 3156. Reassigned by the evaluator as deexciting the 2444 level as determined in (t,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.27 {I4} (1978Be17) 
MR$alternate solution (+0.63 {I7}) is ruled out by 1978Be17 based on a comparison of the experimental B(E2) for each |d solution with the value from a weak-coupling calculation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. Not seen directly in ({+7}Li,|a2n|g) but presence deduced from |g|g (1978Be17) 
TI$from intensity balance at 2600 level in delayed spectrum, I(|g+ce)=48 {I2} relative to I|g(1133+2741|g's)=135 {I6} (1978Be17) 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a one gets I|g=9.6 {I4} for mult=E2 and 5.1 {I3} for mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Wo21. 1969Ra09 report 7149 
M$A{-2}=+0.20 {I2} (1972Wo21,1974Wo05), +0.18 {I7} (1969Ra09) 
MR$<0.05 if J(7168 level)=9/2 (1972Wo21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 896.5 {I5} in 1969He07, 897.0 {I5} in 1970Br12, 896.5 {I3} in 1972Ha59, 896.3 {I3} in 1973Kr02. 
MR$from |g(|q) (1973Kr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level energies. Transition not reported in Coulomb excitation. I(|g+ce)=29.1% {I6} from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$%=31 
$2583.09 (1996De48), observed in 2008Mi01 
RI$I(2583.1|g)/I(1686.8|g)=0.468 {I18} (2008Mi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$%=47 
$1132.30 (1996De48), observed in 2008Mi01 
RI$I(1132.7|g)/I(2741.1|g)=0.771 {I35} (2008Mi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$%=30 
$1930.23 (1996De48), observed in 2008Mi01 
RI$I(1930.2|g)/I(2825.9|g)=0.371 {I19} (2008Mi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$%=9 
$adopted 394.72 (1996De48), observed in 2008Mi01 
RI$I(394.7|g)/I(1527.3|g)=0.175 {I23} (2008Mi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$%=20 
$3395.63 (1996De48) 
E$1984Pr08 doesn't report a |g-ray of this energy, but in the Fig. 1 this paper, there is an apparent peak at this energy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E high-precision Ge(Li) measurement of 1981He15, relative to 53.161 keV {I2} from {+133}Ba and 40.58347 keV {I17} from {+99}Mo (value quoted by 1980Lu11). Other values: 46.545 keV {I15}, Ge(Li) (1974HeYW); 46.503 keV {I15}, ce measurement with a magnetic spectrometer (1957Fr29); 46.52 keV {I2}, cryst (1952Ew17). Others: 2000He14. 
RI weighted average of 4.26 {I7} (1990Hi03) and 4.24 {I5} (1990Sc08), both measurements used high-purity germanium detectors for photons, and ion chambers for |a particles. Other values: 4.18 {I9}, high-purity germanium detector (1983De11); 4.05 {I8}, scin (1958Kr71); 3.8 {I6} (1954Da23); 4.5 {I4} (1957Fi06). Others: 1996Ta22, 1996Hu07, 1995Qu03, 1991Ga09, 1969Fr07, 1958To10, 1953Ba80, 1951Bu37, 1950Cr01, 1935St05. 
M from conversion coefficients and sub-shell ratios. ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=100:10.6 {I2}:0.93 {I5} (1959Se59); ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=100:10.3 {I2}:0.87 {I3} (1969Ge01); ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3):ce(M4):ce(N1):ce(O1) exp=100:10.9:|?1:|?0.1:23:5.5 (1957Fr29); |a(L)exp=15.6 {I8} (1958Kr71); |a(L)exp=14.3 {I15}, semi (1971Ge11) using |w(L)=0.38 {I2} (1957Fi06); |a(L)exp=13.3 {I20} (1957Fi06). Others: 1966Ve01, 1958To10, 1957Fr29, 1953Wu28, 1953Ba80, 1950Cr01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1755.15 {I14} (2011Bo05) - |g-ray energy deviates more than 5|s from least-squares fit value 
RI Other: 0.39 {I5} (2011Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 2011Bo05. Others: 2624.32 {I20} (1983Ts01) and 2624.60 {I33} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 2.5 (1989Sh20), 3.4 {I6} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2828.16 {I16} (1983Ts01) and 2828.60 {I34} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 3.7 (1989Sh20), 3.9 {I5} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2897.77 {I30} (1983Ts01) and 2898.10 {I37} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 1.3 (1989Sh20), 1.9 {I4} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3081.40 {I28} (1983Ts01) and 3081.20 {I39} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 1.6 (1989Sh20), 1.8 {I4} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3141.36 {I57} (1983Ts01) and 3142.00 {I43} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 0.6 (1989Sh20), 0.8 {I4} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3269.53 {I13} (1983Ts01) and 3268.80 {I46} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 0.5 (1989Sh20), 0.6 {I6} (2011Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3356.90 {I15} (1983Ts01) and 3356.70 {I41} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Other: 3.5 {I3} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3396.19 {I15} (1983Ts01) and 3396.10 {I41} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 3.2 (1989Sh20), 3.4 {I3} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3632.97 {I18} (1983Ts01) and 3632.80 {I43} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 2.5 (1989Sh20), 2.6 {I3} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4165.08 {I19} (1983Ts01) and 4165.50 {I58} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Weighted average of 2.21 {I23} (1983Ts01) and 2.38 {I11} (2011Bo05). Other: 3.83 (1989Sh20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4257.09 {I11} (1983Ts01) and 4256.80 {I49} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Weighted average of 4.30 {I24} (1983Ts01) and 3.96 {I18} (2011Bo05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4284.64 {I35} (1983Ts01) and 4284.90 {I54} (1989Sh20). 
RI$Others: 0.7 (1989Sh20), 1.1 {I2} (1983Ts01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, from cascade of 530-320 
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2}, from cascade of 530-674 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I11}, from cascade of 1013-320 
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4}, from cascade of 1013-674 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=0 
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I11}, from cascade of 393-320 
$A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I9}, from cascade of 393-674 
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7}, from cascade of 393-1204 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.14 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3}, from cascade of 2505-320 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6}, from cascade of 2505-393 
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5}, from cascade of 2505-674 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4}, from cascade of 2505-1596 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.06 {I6}, A{-4}=0.00 {I12}, from cascade of 2571-320 
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I12}, from cascade of 2571-1485 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I14}, from cascade of 2624-1065 
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I7}, from cascade of 2624-1398 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I7}, from cascade of 2624-1430 
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5}, from cascade of 2624-1709 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4}, from cascade of 3081-320 
$A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5}, from cascade of 3081-674 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1 
$A{-2}=+0.16 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I19}, from cascade of 3397-320 
$A{-2}=+0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I15}, from cascade of 3397-769 
$A{-2}=+0.09 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I11}, from cascade of 3397-775 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5}, from cascade of 3633-409 
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6}, from cascade of 3633-563 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, from cascade of 4102-320 
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I13}, from cascade of 4102-348 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E|g fits placement poorly; datum excluded from least-squares fit. Implied final level energy is 404.467 {I24} cf. Adopted value of 404.866 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E|g fits placement poorly; datum excluded from least-squares fit. Implied final level energy is 403.46 {I9} cf. Adopted value of 404.866 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M $from ce data. |a(K)exp=0.099 {I5} (average of renormalized measurements of 1971Ra30,1968Go15,1965Co06,1965Me07,1963Va05); L1/L2=2.1 (1965Br35); K/L=4 {I1} (1965Co06) (theory: L1/L2=3.12 {I27},K/L=4.6 {I4}) 
MR from -1.15 (|g|g(|q,pol) 1968Go15) and 0.98 {I+8-7} (from |a(K)exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from L1/L2=6.8 (1965Br35), 10 (1938Ch04); |a(L)exp=7.2 (Ice(L)(1938Ch04)/I|g). (theory: L1/L2=9.39 {I20}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.143 {I17} (weighted average of renormalized values of 1968Go15,1965Co06,1965Me07,1963Va05); K/L=7 {I2} (1965Co06); L1/L2=5.0 (1965Br35). (theory: K/L=5.84 {I12}, L1/L2=9.78 {I23}) 
MR from |g|g(|q): 9/2(427|g)7/2(405|g)9/2 cascade with |d(405|g)=-1.1 {I1} and A{-2}=-0.094 {I6} (weighted average of measurements by 1968Da07,1968Go15,1965Co06,1964Uh01,1963Va05). Other: 0.17 {I15} |g|g(|q,pol) (1968Go15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I2} (weighted average of renormalized values of 1968Go15,1965Me07,1963Va05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.036 {I5} (weighted average of renormalized values of 1968Go15 and 1963Va05); |g|g(|q). 
MR $from |g|g(|q): 9/2(705|g)7/2(405|g)9/2 cascade with |d(405|g)=-1.1 {I1} and A{-2}=-0.094 {I4} (weighted average of measurements by 1968Da07,1968Go15,1965Ag03,1965Co06,1963Va05); |d=0.4 {I+3-4} from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M from K/L(exp)=6.7 {I10} (theory: K/L=5.94 {I12}); this does not exclude E1, but |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M $from K/L(exp)=4.4 {I8}, |a(K)exp=0.0089 {I26} from |a(K)exp(766|g)/|a(K)exp(828|g)=3.5 {I10} with |a(K)(766|g)=0.0313 {I5} (theory: |a(K)=0.0089 {I11}, K/L=4.58 {I9}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M $from K/L(exp)=5.3 {I4}; |a(K)exp=0.43 {I15} from |a(K)exp(302|g)/|a(K)exp(322|g)=0.15 {I5} with |a(K)(302)=0.0652 {I10} (theory: |a(K)=0.313 {I5}, K/L=5.80 {I12}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E absence of a prompt component in p-ce(t) studies of this transition indicates that it directly depopulates the 1227-keV isomer. 
M from L12/L3(exp)|?1.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 115.190 {I6} (1977Ku25), 115.179 {I9} (1963Ew06), 115.174 {I8} (1963Se20). (E|g have been recalculated by the evaluator from the B|*|r measurements of 1963Ew06 and 1963Se20). 
RI$others: 1.4 {I3} (1961Gi02), 1.3 {I3} (1972DaZA), 1.4 {I1} (1978Av01), and 1.65 {I12} (1982Sa36) 
M$from |a(K)exp=5.8 {I9} (measured K| x ray/|g in coincidence experiment, 1960Ro16) and L1:L2:L3=1:0.12 {I1}: <0.02 (1957Kr49). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I(ce(K))/(|S|b{+-})=0.313 {I6} (1948Ma30), 0.288 (1948Fe09). Other: 1955Ni19 
E$from 1979He10. Others: 238.625 {I6} (1977Ku25), 238.624 {I9} (1965Gr05, E|g recalculated by the evaluator from B|*|r measurement) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.74 {I7} (measured K| x ray/|g in coincidence experiment, 1960Ro16), K/L and L-subshell ratios (1969Ge01,1967Ho13,1959Se59,1957Kr49,1957Vo22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1957Zh05 
RI$others: 0.50 {I10} (1961Gi02) and 0.10 {I3} (1972DaZA) 
M$from K/L=5.6 {I6} (1957Kr49) and |a(K)exp=1.9 {I2} (Ice of 1957Zh05, adopted I|g and |a(L1)(115.178|g, M1)=0.912). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ku25 
RI$others: 7.7 {I4} (1960Ro16), 6.9 {I4} (1961Gi02), 7.7 {I15} (1972DaZA), 6.3 {I2} (1978Av01), 6.7 {I5} (1982Sa36), 7.5 {I2} (1983Sc13), 7.32 {I14} (1983Va22) and 7.6 {I3} (1992Li05). 
M$from K/L1=5.7 {I6} (1957Vo22) and |a(K)exp=0.37 {I4} (from Ice of 1957Vo22, adopted I|g and |a(K)(238.632|g, M1)=0.740). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from 1963Da11, 1957Vo22 
RI$from I|g(415)/I|g(300)=0.0039 {I6} (1990VeZW). Other values: I|g(415)=0.33 {I5} (1961Gi02), I|g(415)|?0.3 (1960Ro16). Others: 1957Zh05, 1957Vo22. 
M$From |a(K)exp|?0.23 (from ce(K)=0.003% (1957Kr49) and I|g=0.013% {I2}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved, strongly converted transition postulated by 1994Li10 to account for the decay of the 380-keV level eventually to the 239-keV isomer in {+212}Bi (1994Li10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$see general comment above for placement of this transition in the decay scheme. 
RI$0.23 relative to 0.27 for 115.2|g from {+216}At (0.30 ms) decay (1994Li10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.45 {I4} ({+217}At |a decay), |a(K)exp=0.56 {I4} ({+213}Pb |b- decay). M1 in 1969LeZW from (|a)(K| x ray)/(|a)(|g) coincidence. 
MR Deduced by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.45 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 257.88 {I4} (1997Ch19), 258.5 {I2} (1981Di14), and 257.87 {I4} (1996GrZT). 
RI Others: 0.0297 {I20} (1996GrZT), 0.04 {I1} (1969ArZV), and also 0.056 {I20} by scaling I|g(258.5)=0.239 {I20} (relative) (1981Di14) with I|g(218)=49 (relative) (1981Di14) and and I|g(218)=11.38% of {+221}Fr |a decay (11.57% {I15} (1986He06) and 11.2% {I2} (1997Ch19). 
M M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.45 {I4} (1997Ch19). M1 from (|a)(K| x ray)/(|a)(|g) coincidence (1969LeZW). 
MR Deduced from |a(K)exp=0.45 {I4} (1997Ch19) using BriccMixing code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 335.33 {I10} (1997Ch19) and 335.24 {I5} (1996GrZT). Others: 334 (1969LeZW). 
RI Other: 0.0048 {I9} (1996GrZT). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ From 1996GrZT. Others: 593.1 {I2} (1997Ch19), 593.1 (1981Di14). 
RI Other: 0.0128 {I9} (1996GrZT), also 0.018 {I6} by scaling I|g(593.1)=0.0507 {I25} (relative) (1981Di14) with I|g(218)=49 (relative) (1981Di14) and and I|g(218)=11.38% of {+221}Fr |a decay (11.57% {I15} (1986He06) and 11.2% {I2} (1997Ch19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from L1:L2:L3=650:124:10.1 (1954Ml77) and L1/L2=10 {I3}, L1/L3=85 {I15} (1957Ni11) ({+214}Pb |b{+-} decay) and |a(tot)=8.6 {I4} (2019Cu02) ({+218}At |a decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 53.2260 {I14} (1952Mu45), 53.2230 {I21} (1991Be06) and 53.232 {I4} (2002MoZP). 
RI$weighted average of 2.49 {I12} (1983Sc13), 2.329 {I23} (2002De03) and 2.383 {I20} (2002MoZP). 
M,MR$from the Adopted Gammas with L1:L2:L3=650:124:10.1 (1954Ml77); L1/L2=10 {I3}, L1/L3=85 {I15} (1957Ni11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced from level energy difference; transition not observed, but expected to be the dominant decay path (1991Be06). 
$Intensity balance at the 62.68-keV level yields I(|g+ce)(62.7|g)+I(|g+ce)(9.5|g)=0.314 {I25}. 
$The transition E|g=62.7 was not observed; 1991Be06 set a limit for its intensity: I|g(62.7|g)/I|g(53.23|g)<0.003. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 258.82 {I10} (1969Li10) and 258.87 {I4} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 1.23 {I6} (1990Mo08), 1.14 {I3} (1991Li11), 1.17 {I3} (1998Mo14), 1.15 {I4} (2000Sa32) and 1.171 {I9} (2002De03). 
M$K/L1=5.7 (1954Ml77), assuming 10% uncertainty by evaluator; |a(K)exp|?0.58; deduced |d=0.0 {I25} (1954Ml77,1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 241.924 {I30} (1952Mu45), 241.981 {I8} (1977Zo01), 241.9983 {I30} (1991Be06) and 241.995 {I4} (2002MoZP). 
RI$weighted average of 16.0 {I3} (1983Sc13), 16.23 {I10} (1990Mo08), 16.1 {I3} (1991Li11), 15.7 {I3} (1998Mo14), 16.1 {I1} (2000Sa32), 15.90 {I5} (2002De03) and 15.98 {I6} (2002MoZP). 
M,MR$K:L1:L2=425:78:17.1 (1954Ml77); K/L=5.30 {I15} (1957Ni11); |a(K)exp=0.73 {I16}, |a(L)exp=0.104 {I26} (1991Be06); (242|g)(53|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.194 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 295.217 {I39} (1952Mu45), 295.213 {I8} (1977Zo01), 295.226 {I2} (1991Be06) and 295.219 {I5} (2002MoZP). 
RI$weighted average of 41.3 {I9} (1983Ol01), 40.8 {I8} (1983Sc13), 41.85 {I26} (1990Mo08), 41.9 {I6} (1991Li11), 40.0 {I7} (1998Mo14), 40.8 {I12} (2000Sa32), 40.36 {I12} (2002De03) and 40.61 {I13} (2002MoZP). 
M,MR$K/L1=6.5, K/L2=39, K/M1=28 (1954Ml77), 5.55 {I15} (1957Ni11); |a(K)exp=0.418 {I38}, |a(L)exp=0.082 {I10} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 351.992 {I62} (1952Mu45), 351.921 {I8} (1977Zo01), 351.9319 {I19} (1991Be06) and 351.939 {I6} (2002MoZP). 
RI$weighted average of 79.6 {I17} (1983Ol01), 78.7 {I13} (1983Sc13), 81.48 {I48} (1990Mo08), 81.6 {I12} (1991Li11), 77.5 {I14} (1998Mo14), 78.5 {I24} (2000Sa32), 78.16 {I23} (2002De03) and 78.34 {I23} (2002MoZP). 
M,MR$K/L1=5.9, K/L2=33, K/M1=26 (1954Ml77), K/L=5.65 {I15} (1957Ni11); |a(K)exp=0.280 {I23}, |a(L)exp=0.049 {I5} (1991Be06). 
$56.84- and 298.76-keV |g decays not observed, tentatively placed by 1969Li10. A ce line observed by 1954Ml77 at 40.30 keV was interpreted by 1969Li10 as the L1 of 56.84|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 274.8 {I1} (1969Li10), 274.78 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 274.80 {I5} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.84 {I5} (1990Mo08), 0.732 {I11} (1998Mo14) and 0.83 {I8} (2000Sa32). 
M,MR$K/L1=6.4 (1954Ml77) assuming 10% uncertainty by evaluator; |a(K)exp|?0.52 deduced |d=0.00 {I2} (1954Ml77,1991Be06), (275|g)(259|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 480.5 {I2} (1969Li10), 480.54 {I16} (1982Ak03) and 480.43 {I2} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.71 {I5} (1990Mo08), 0.694 {I25} (1991Li11), 0.75 {I4} (1998Mo14), 0.74 {I3} (2000Sa32) and 0.749 {I10} (2002De03). 
M,MR$from (480|g)(53|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I9} deduced |d=0.00 {I+19-17} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 533.8 {I2} (1969Li10), 533.71 {I16} (1982Ak03) and 533.66 {I2} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.39 {I3} (1990Mo08), 0.403 {I20} (1991Li11) and 0.39 {I3} (2000Sa32). 
$181.5- and 238.4-keV |g decays tentatively assigned by 1969Li10. Not observed by others. A ce line observed by 1954Ml77 at 90.96 was interpreted by 1969Li10 as being the K of a 181.5|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 538.7 {I4} (1969Li10), 538.47 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 538.41 {I8} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.038 {I9} (1982Ak03), 0.044 {I6} (1990Mo08) and 0.037 {I20} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1990Mo08. 
RI$weighted average of 0.075 {I16} (1982Ak03), 0.068 {I5} (1990Mo08) and 0.080 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 462.1 {I2} (1969Li10) and 462.00 {I7} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.40 {I4} (1990Mo08), 0.479 {I20} (1991Li11) and 0.470 {I14} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 487.25 {I20} (1969Li10) and 487.90 {I7} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.83 {I7} (1990Mo08), 0.92 {I4} (1991Li11), 0.96 {I4} (1998Mo14), 0.90 {I5} (2000Sa32) and 0.961 {I12} (2002De03). 
M$|a(K)exp<0.024 (1954Ml77,1991Be06); (487|g)(352|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 544.0 {I3} (1969Li10) and 543.81 {I7} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.15 {I2} (1990Mo08) and 0.10 {I1} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 580.3 {I2} (1969Li10), 580.11 {I16} (1982Ak03) and 580.13 {I3} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 0.79 {I11} (1982Ak03), 0.76 {I6} (1990Mo08), 0.76 {I3} (1991Li11), 0.84 {I4} (1998Mo14), 0.74 {I4} (2000Sa32) and 0.823 {I11} (2002De03). 
M$|a(K)exp<0.024 (1954Ml77,1991Be06); (580|g)(259|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1990Mo08. 
M$|a(K)exp<0.009 (1954Ml77,1991Be06), (786|g)(53|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.21 {I8} (1991Be06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 839.2 {I2} (1969Li10), 839.03 {I16} (1982Ak03) and 839.04 {I9} (1990Mo08). 
RI$weighted average of 1.29 {I10} (1990Mo08), 1.27 {I3} (1991Li11) and 1.29 {I4} (2000Sa32). 
M$from its ce lines not observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$The 511.0|g was observed to be in direct coincidence with the 324- and 314-keV |g transitions, and placed by 1990Mo08 between a level at 888 keV and the 377-keV level. The authors of 1990Mo08 consider this placement, and therefore existence of the proposed level at 888 keV, to be questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g not observed, but expected to be the dominant decay path because the coincident relation between 6693|a and the 53.3|g (2019Cu02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$measured |a(K)exp from K| x ray and I|g gives dominant M1 with |d(E2/M1)<0.7, or much less likely E1+M2 with |d(M2/E1)=0.50 {I8}. Some E2 admixture is possible. Also |a(K)exp=1.4 {I3} from total |b-gated K| x ray spectrum (2013De20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=0.075 {I60} (evaluators) from intensity balance at 1160.7 level is consistent with E2; with |d(E2/M1)=2.2 {I12}. Other possibility of E1+M2 with |d(M2/E1)=0.35 {I15} is unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp measured from K| x ray and I|g 
M$measured |a(K)exp gives dominant E2; |d(E2/M1)=5.0 {I11}, or unlikely possibility of E1+M2 with |d(M2/E1)=0.165 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
CC$Theoretical conversion coefficient from BrIcc code 
TI$from I|a=74 {I20} per 100 |a decays 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from |a(K)exp|?2 (from ce data,2006An36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Similar 375 keV {I1} |g ray is also reported in coincidence with 6966|a, assigned to {+187m}Pb in 2002An19. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Possible doublet speculated by the authors (2016An10) due to the 445|g having a stronger coincidence with 262|g then with the 343|g. Also the 363|g has a clear coincidence with the 262|g but its coincidence with the 343|g is uncertain. 
$|g in coin with Po K x-rays, 154, 343, 363, 430, 438, 445 |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Firm placement of this 154|g in the decay scheme was not possible due to a lack of |g-|g coin data but sufficient to support the suggestion by 2003Va16 
M$E1 character indicated by relative I|g of transitions depopulating levels below the 2293 keV isomer. Magnetic character excluded by small K x-rays intensity 
$|g in coin with Po K x-rays, 262, 343, 438, 518, 578 |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement in level scheme is tentative and is based on energy balance and the systematics of E3 transitions in the decay paths of 11- isomers in Po isotopes. Also the authors noted, three counts were observed in coincidence with the 262, 343, 438, and 518 keV |g transitions 
M$From systematics of E3 transitions in the decay paths of 11- isomers in Po isotopes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
1997Fo06 report a 486 keV |g ray placed from tentative levels 1105 to 619 in their level scheme, not confirmed by 1999He32. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 757.6 {I2} from {+194}Po IT decay and 758.1 {I5} from ({+28}Si,4n|g) 
RI$other: 116 {I84} from ({+28}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 958.7 {I5} from ({+28}Si,4n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38.8 {I63} from {+194}Po IT decay and 37 {I14} from ({+28}Si,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 340.1 {I3} from {+194}Po IT decay and 340.8 {I3} from ({+28}Si,4n|g) 
M$|DJ=(1), dipole from |g(|q) in ({+28}Si,4n|g); (E1) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved |g-ray but 2016An10 indicate that the 33|g could populate the 2281 level as the weak 296.8 |g decay of the 2281 level was observed in the delayed |g ray spectroscopic data indicating population of the 2281 by an isomeric state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp|<2.3 {I4}. Value was considered as an upper limit as additional sources of Po K x-rays from significant E0 components as well as unobserved highly converted transitions cannot be ruled out. However, 2016An10 have strongly suggested M2 transition based on their observation of the Po K x-rays intensities in coincidence with other transitions as well as the intensity balance from |g|g coincidence at the 8+ level, with intensity of the 248|g calculated for several other possible multipolarities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved |g-ray but 2016An10 indicate that the 33|g could populate the 2281 level as the weak 296.8 |g decay of the 2281 level was observed in the delayed |g ray spectroscopic data indicating population of the 2281 by an isomeric state. Energy is from level-energy difference. 2016An10 give |?33 keV 
TI$deduced by evaluators, assuming absolute I(|g+ce)=100 for the three transitions (33, 248 and 622 keV) from the 2313-keV isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
$Relative I(|g+ce)=71 {I4} (2016An10) 
M$from |a(K)exp|<2.3 {I4}. Value was considered as an upper limit as additional sources of Po K x-rays from significant E0 components as well as unobserved highly converted transitions cannot be ruled out. However, 2016An10 have strongly suggested M2 transition based on their observation of the Po K x-rays intensities in coincidence with other transitions as well as the intensity balance from |g|g coincidence at the 8+ level, with intensity of the 248|g calculated for several other possible multipolarities 
$|g in coin with Po K x-rays, 319, 366, 373, 459, 462, 545 |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_comment:
$From intensity of Po x rays, detection of first excited 0+ to g.s. E0 transition cannot be excluded 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI From I|g(241.2|g)/I|g(712.3|g)=0.075 {I10} measured in coin with 126|g. Singles value is 3 {I1}. 
I|g(0|')/I|g(90|')>1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
I|g(0|')/I|g(90|')=1.51 {I6} 
M Estimated also from comparison of B(E3)(W.u.) (25) with the value for the (|ph{-9/2},i{-13/2})11- to (|ph{-9/2}{+2})8+ E3-transition in {+200}Po (13.5 {I12}) (1986Ma31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M$from K/L12=1.53 {I22}, K/L3=1.81 {I29}, K/M=1.90 {I32} (1985St02); theory: K/L12=1.38, K/L3=1.56, K/M=2.44 
ce(K)(238|g) were observed to be in coin with Po K| x ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ EG=402.3, RI=30 (1985We05) 
M$stretched quadrupole suggested from A{-2} and A{-4} values of 1985We05 is inconsistent with |DJ=1, D+Q suggested by DCO values from 1994La35 and 1994JiZZ 
MR$-5.7 {I30} or -0.14 {I+7-20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}, |a(K)exp=0.012 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.004 {I2}, K/L=3.0 {I10} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.221 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I13} {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$No |g ray was observed. The energy determined from the observed ce-K line in {+200}At |e decay 
M$|a(K)exp>0.08 in {+200}At |e decay (1998Bi06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.005 {I2}, K/L=3.1 {I10} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g),{+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.173 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.042 {I12} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}; |a(K)exp=0.020 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.008 {I2}, K/L=2.6 {I10} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g)(1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.225 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From the energy difference between the 373.8 keV {I2} and 361.5 keV {I2} gamma-rays that depopulate the J|p=7- level at 2135 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.11 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g)(1990Ma14); A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05); |a(K)exp=0.0075 {I14} in {+200}At |e decay (1998Bi06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I14}, A{-4}=0.16 {I11} {I7} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g)(1990Ma14); |a(K)exp=0.23 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.047 {I13} in {+200}At |e decay (1998Bi06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=0.03 {I3} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g)(1990Ma14); |a(K)exp<0.09 in {+200}At |e decay (1998Bi06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Not observed in 1990Ma14 
M$E1 multipolarity is excluded, based on the relative intensity of 100.7|g in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.2 {I2}, A{-4}=0.1 {I1}, |a(L)exp=1.4 {I10} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g),{+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.29 {I7}, A{-4}=0.06 {I5} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.19 {I10}, A{-4}=0.04 {I13} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I3}; |a(K)exp=0.022 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.011 {I8}, K/L=2.0 {I8} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.12 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1}; |a(K)exp=0.072 {I25}, |a(L)exp=0.015 {I10}, K/L=4.5 {I20} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.2 {I1}, A{-4}=0.0 {I1} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=-0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=0.03 {I9} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.35 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I9} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.31 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.19 {I25}, A{-4}=0.0 {I3} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=0.22 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.3 {I2} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=-0.07 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I14} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=-0.60 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I19} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.15 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I9} in {+184}W({+20}Ne,4n|g), {+183}W({+22}Ne,5n|g) (1990Ma14); A{-2}=-0.06 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I18} in {+194}Pt({+12}C,6n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$No |g ray was observed. The energy determined from the observed ce-K line in 1998Bi06 
M$|a(K)exp>0.08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.09 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.014 {I3}; Other: |a(K)exp in 1992Hu04 
E$This transition is observed to be delayed with T{-1/2}|?72 ns using 564.6|g(t) (1998Bi06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 418.5 keV {I6} (1976Ko13), 417.6 keV {I3} (1971Jo19) an 417.8 keV {I6} (1986Br28) 
M$|a(K)exp=2.49 {I32}, K/L=1.8 {I2}, L/M=2.5 {I3} (1986Br28); K/L=2.0 {I3} (1976Ko13), 1.6 {I2} (1971Jo19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.5 {I2}, A{-4}=0.1 {I3}, but values are distorted since the 613.6|g is situated on the slope of both the neutron bump and the stronger 611.2|g in {+194}Pt({+12}C,5n|g) (1985We05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 418.5 keV {I6} (1976Ko13), 417.6 keV {I3} (1971Jo19) and 417.8 keV {I6} (1986Br28) 
M$|a(K)exp=2.49 {I32}, K/L=1.8 {I2}, L/M=2.5 {I3} (1986Br28); K/L=2.0 {I3} (1976Ko13) and 1.6 {I2} (1971Jo19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E,M$From adopted gammas 
RI$From I(|g+ce) and |a 
TI$From the decay scheme and the intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. 
TI$Taken as half of I(|g+ce)(623.3-keV level)=12.9 {I12}, determined from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.5 {I2}, A{-4}=0.1 {I3}, but values are distorted since the 613.6|g is situated on the slope of both the neutron bump and the stronger 611.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I4} consistent with M1(+E2), but the 1985We05 level scheme requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI,M$From Adopted gammas 
$|s(Coulomb excitation)=0.45 b {I6} for {+104}Pd target, 0.39 b {I8} for {+94}Mo target 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM4;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM4W
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.25 {I3} in {+203}At |e decay (1987Se04); |a(K)exp=0.61 {I2} in {+203}Po IT decay, {+204}Pb(|a,5n|g) (1986Fa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.060 {I10} in {+203}At |e decay (1987Se04); Other:|a(K)exp=0.030 {I15} in {+204}Pb(|a,5n|g) (1986Fa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0534 (used as normalization for the conversion electron measurement) and A{-2}=0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} in {+204}Pb(|a,5n|g) (1986Fa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.024 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}, inconsistent with stretched E2, in {+204}Pb(|a,5n|g) (1986Fa04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$From I(|g+ce)(2.3|g)=36% and %BR(639.4|g)=0.0115 {I19} using the adopted |g-ray intensities and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI$From I(|g+ce)(2.3|g)=36% and %BR(639.4|g)=0.8985 {I19} using the adopted |g-ray intensities and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.61 {I2} (1986Fa04). Other: |a(K)exp/(|a(L)exp +|a(M)exp)=2.4 {I3} and |a(K)exp=0.18 {I7} (1969MoZV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.08 {i2}. Value estimated by assuming that the obscuring 641.5 keV transition has a pure M4 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0534 ( used as normalization for the conversion electron measurement); A{-2}=0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.03 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) are not consistent with a |DJ=0 transition 
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.057 {I12} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From |a(K)exp=0.20 {I2} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04). Other: 0.6 {I4} from |a(K)exp=0.21 {I5} in {+204}At |e decay (1983He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Others: A{-2}=0.14 {I4} and A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) are consistent with |DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Other: E|g=751.8 keV {I10} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) 
M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp|?0.02 and A{-2}=0.05 {I8}, A{-4}=0.04 {I11} in {+204}Pb({+3}He,3n|g) (1987Ra04). Note that |a(K)exp=0.005 and A{-2}<0 in {+204}Pb(|a,4n|g) would favor E1 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
CC$The transition energy is too close to the K-shell binding energy. The |a(exp) value does not include the K-shell component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Placement based on adopted gammas. Coin with 684|g and no coin with any other |g (see Table IV of 1983He08) supports this assignment. 
M$From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0119, value used as normalization; A{-2}=0.068 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}. Note that the measured A{-2} value is not consistent with the assigned multipolarity, presumably due to attenuation of alignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0215 {I4}; A{-2}=0.079 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} Note that the measured A{-2} value is not consistent with the assigned multipolarity, presumably due to attenuation of alignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0313 {I6}; A{-2}=0.080 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I4}. Note that the measured A{-2} value is not consistent with the assigned multipolarity, presumably due to attenuation of alignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.02; A{-2}=0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7}. Note, that the A{-2} value is not consistent with the adopted stretched E2 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$761.49 {I3} from adopted gammas, probably a multiplet 
M$|a(K)exp=0.03 would suggest M1+E2 assignment, but the adopted level scheme favors E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.005; A{-2}=0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=0.14 {I7}. Note that the measured A{-2} value is not consistent with the assigned multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.01; A{-2}<0. Note that the measured A{-2} value is not consistent with the assigned multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Table II in 1990Fa03 cites 1983He08 and 1987Ra04 for this |g, but it was not reported in either work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.34 {I5}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.60 {I8} and |a(L3)exp=0.39 {I5} (1982Ku20); |a(L)exp=0.9 {I7} (1971Jo19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed directly, but required by the coincidence relationship in {+205}At |e decay. The energy deduced from level energy diffrence 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0109, |a(L)exp=0.00270 {I20}, |a(M)exp=0.00066 {I7} and |a(N)exp=0.00022 {I3} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3} (1971Jo19); K/(L+M)=3.67 {I53} (1970Ho15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=11.4 {I12},(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=3.6 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.50 {I6}, |a(M)exp=1.09 {I14} and |a(N)exp=0.30 {I4} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=11.0 {I10} (1971Jo19); (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=2.3 (1985Ra18); K/L=2.95 {I15} (1974Ro36); |a(exp)=18.2 in 1962Ha26 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.36 {I4}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.061 {I9} and 0.0168 {I21} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=0.33 {I5} (1971Jo19); |a(K)exp=0.27 {I3} (1985Ra18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0420 {I21} (1985Ra18), K/(L+M)=1.55 {I16} (1974Ro36), |a(K)exp=0.037 {I6} and K/L=1.8 {I3} (1974Oh06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$The absence of prompt component in the 260|g(t) spectrum (1985Ra18) indicates that 260|g directly depopulates the isomer 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0160 {I16}; A{-2}=-0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I2} (1985Ra18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.03 (1985Ra18). Note, that reported A{-2}=0.16 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} values (1985Ra18) are inconsistent with these expected for J to J-1 E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From adopted levels. Not observed directly, but required by the coincidence relationship (1982Ku21). 
RI$From intensity balance at the 154-keV level, by assuming that there is no direct |b-decay feeding to this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$From intensity balance and by assuming that there is no direct |b-decay feeding to the 154-keV level. I(154|g)=8.4 {i6} in 1982Ku20. 
M$|a(K)exp=2.69 {I13} and |a(M)exp=0.101 {I15} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=3.0 {I6} (1971Jo19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=11.4 {I12},(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=3.6 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.50 {I6}, |a(M)exp=1.09 {I14} and |a(N)exp=0.30 {I4} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=11.0 {I10} (1971Jo19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.36 {I4}, (|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)=0.061 {I9} and 0.0168 {I21} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=0.33 {I5} (1971Jo19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Not in coin with any |g (1982Ku21), suggesting decay either to g.s. or to isomer. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0137 {I15} (1982Ku20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Not in coin with any |g (1982Ku21), suggesting decay either to g.s. or to isomer. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0125 {I15} (1982Ku20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Not in coin with any |g (1982Ku21), suggesting decay either to g.s. or to isomer. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0066 {I10} (1982Ku20); |a(K)exp=0.008 {I4} (1971Jo19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$Not in coin with any |g (1982Ku21), suggesting decay either to g.s. or to isomer. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0080 {I8} (1982Ku20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0120 {I6}. Note that reported A{-2}=0.04 {I1} value in 1985Ra18 is inconsistent with that expected one for a stretched E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.03; Note, that reported A{-2}=0.16 {I5} and A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} values (1985Ra18) are inconsistent with these expected for J to J-1 E1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0114, |a(L)exp=0.0029 and |a(M)exp=0.0012 (1977Li16); |a(K)exp=0.0122 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0027 {I1}, and |a(M)exp=0.0008 {I1} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I2}, consistent with |DJ=0 transition, and |a(K)exp=0.13 {I1} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0090 {I12} and |a(M)exp=0.0023 {I12} (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=0.026 {I8} (1982Br07); |a(K)exp=0.032 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0101 {I6}, and |a(M)exp=0.0027 {I2} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} and A{-2}=0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 100 {I12} (1990Ba31) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.67 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.11 {I2} and |a(M)exp=0.022 {I11} (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=0.60 {I6} and |a(L)exp=0.107 {I22} (1982Br07); A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} and |a(K)exp=0.10 {I3} (1986Ra24); A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1990Ba31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 59 {I6} (1990Ba31) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0145 {I23} (1982Br07), but this value suggests E2+M1 assignment; A{-2}=0.09 {I1}, A{-4}=0.03 {I1} (1986Ra24) and A{-2}=0.03 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I17} (1990Ba31). The A{-2} value is inconsistent with E2 assignment from the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.015 {I7} in 1977Li16 requires E2, but |a(K)exp=0.29 {I5} in 1982Br07 and |a(K)exp=0.20 {I4} in 1986Ra24 suggest dominant M1; A{-2}=0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=0.11 {I6} in (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.016 {I2} and |a(M)exp=0.004 {I2} (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=0.038 {I4} (1982Br07); |a(K)exp=0.0381 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.0165 {I10}, and |a(M)exp=0.0076 {I4} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=0.17 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} and A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I20} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.063 {I17} (1977Li16), 0.060 {I4} (1982Br07,1986Ra24); |a(K)exp=0.058 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0105 {I4}, and |a(M)exp=0.0021 {I1} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}, A{-2}=0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)|?0.22, |a(L3)exp|?0.15 (1982Br07); |a(exp)=0.066 {I26} in 1990Ba31, consistent only with Mult.=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I1} and |a(L)exp=0.0018 {I5} (1990Ba31), but the value is somewhat larger for Mult.=E1, presumably due to penetration 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Note Mult.=E1 suggested in 1977Li16, but arguments were not presented. The level scheme requires M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4}, A{-2}=0.54 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I15} (1986Ra24); |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} (1986Ra24); |a(K)exp=0.015 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.0018 {I5} (1990Ba31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I2} (1990Ba31) and 0.023 {I5} (1986Ra24); A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=0.50 {I7} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.43 {I22}, |a(L)exp=0.25 {I7} and |a(M)exp|?0.06 (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=1.43 {I20} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=0.21 {I11}, |a(L)exp<0.028, |a(M)exp<0.014 (1990Ba31); A{-2}=-0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2}, A{-2}=-0.25 {I8}, A{-4}=0.08 {I13} and |a(K)exp=0.05 (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0098 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0028 {I2} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=0.08 {I2} (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1} (1990Ba31); |a(K)exp=0.010 (1986Ra24), but the |g rays is a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.99 {I12}, A{-4}=0.18 {I16} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=-0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=0.64 {I7} and |a(K)exp=0.04 (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5} (1990Ba31); A{-2}=-0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=0.11 {I5} and |a(K)exp=0.15 (1986Ra24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 87.7 {I24} (1982Br07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0090 {I12} and |a(M)exp=0.0023 {I12} (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=0.026 {I8} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 4.2 {I3} (1982Br07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.67 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.11 {I2} and |a(M)exp=0.022 {I11} (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=0.60 {I6} and |a(L)exp=0.107 {I22} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 7.89 {I21} (1982Br07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0145 {I23} (1982Br07). Note, that this value suggests E2+M1 assignment, but the adopted level scheme requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 2.7 {I3} (1977Li16) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.015 {I7} in 1977Li16 requires E2, but |a(K)exp=0.29 {I5} in 1982Br07 suggests M1. The later is preferred owing to the (M1+E2) character of the 864.3|g to 2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 44.4 {I8} (1982Br07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.016 {I2} and |a(M)exp=0.004 {I2} (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=0.038 {I4} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas, based on |g-rays energy difference in {+198}Pt({+13}C,5n|g) in 1990Ba31 
RI$From intensity balance and |a{-T} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 2.98 {I12} (1982Br07) and 6.3 {I5} from I|g(528|g)/I|g(477|g)=0.071 {I6} (2023St05) and I|g(477|g)=88 from 1977Li16 
M$|a(K)exp=0.07 {I3} (1977Li16) and 0.091 {I11} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 2.7 {I3} (1977Li16) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.015 {I7} in 1977Li16 requires E2, but |a(K)exp=0.29 {I5} in 1982Br07 suggests M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 2.20 {I8} (1982Br07) and 3.8 {I4} from I|g(528|g)/I|g(477|g)=0.071 {I6} (2023St05) and I|g(477|g)=88 from 1977Li16 
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I9} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 0.63 {I15} (1982Br07) 
M$|a(K)exp=1.43 {I22}, |a(L)exp=0.25 {I7} and |a(M)exp|?0.06 (1977Li16) and |a(K)exp=1.43 {I20} (1982Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 6.14 {I19} (1982Br07) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.063 {I17} (1977Li16) Others: |a(K)exp=0.060 {I4} (1982Br07). This transition is a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.03 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I17}. The A{-2} value is inconsistent with the E2 assignment from the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.24 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I17}, but these values are inconsistent with the E2 assignment that follows from the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.0018 {I5} requires E2. The K line may contain contribution from an impurity. Level scheme requires E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.09 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I15}. Note, that these values are inconsistent with the multipolarity derived from the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I2} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.13 {I1} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}; A{-2}=0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.027 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)) and 0.13 {I1} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.10 {I3} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.09 {I1}, A{-4}=0.03 {I1} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)). Note, that the A{-2} value is inconsistent with the proposed multipolarity; |a(K)exp=0.017 {I2} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=0.11 {I6} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.20 {I4} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2}; A{-2}=0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I20} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.033 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)) and 0.39 {I3} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)). Note that the 394.8 + 395.5 doublet has an average |a(K)exp that agrees with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.08 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}; A{-2}=0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I3} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.057 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)) and 0.060 {I4} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4}; A{-2}=0.54 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I15} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.010 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)) and 0.011 {I4} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=0.50 {I7}; |a(K)exp=0.029 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)) and 0.023 {I5} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.25 {I8}, A{-4}=0.08 {I13} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)); |a(K)exp=0.05 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)); |g-ray intensity balance in the out-of-beam data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=0.08 {I2} |a(K)exp=0.010 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)). Note, that the 805.9 + 806.3 doublet has an average |a(K)exp that agrees with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.033 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)) and 0.039 {I3} ({+206}Pb({+3}He,3n|g)). Note, that the 394.8 + 395.5 doublet has an average |a(K)exp that agrees with E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.010 ({+206}Pb(|a,4n|g)). Note that the 805.9 + 806.3 doublet has an average |a(K)exp that agrees with E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0024 {I3}; A{-2}=0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} consistent with |DJ=0 transition in {+208}Pb(|a,5n|g),{+206}Pb(|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(exp)=55 {I10}, deduced from an intensity balances in delayed spectrum in {+208}Pb(|a,5n|g),{+206}Pb(|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed. Existence inferred from 719.5|g-198.4|g coin 
TI$From I(|g+ce)(465.4|g)/I(|g+ce)(3.4|g)=2 (1985Ra18) in {+208}Pb(|a,5n|g),{+206}Pb(|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=0.06 {I5} in {+208}Pb(|a,5n|g),{+206}Pb(|a,3n|g). The assignment is ambiguous 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. 300.47 keV {I7} in 1978Sc12 
M$|a(K)exp=1.53 {I10}. K:L12:L3:M:N+=100:24.0 {I5}:1.47 {I22}:6.14 {I24}:2.14 {I24} 
MR$|d(E3/M2)<0.09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. 268.08 keV {I7} in 1978Sc12 
M$|a(K)exp=0.224 {I18}. K:L12:L3:M:N+=100.0 {I17}:239 {I4}:77.4 {I19}:86.1 {I21}:34.3 {I15} 
MR$|d(M4/E3)<0.03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$L1/L2=0.06 and L2/L3=1.09 (1981Ch38); Other: L1:L2:L3=<0.05:1.17 {I5}: 1 (1970Jo20). 
RI$From (Ice(L)=95 and |eL(exp)=30.42 (1981Ch38). I|g(exp)=4.8 {I24} (1981Ch38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Transition placed by the evaluators based on level energy differences and required Mult. 
M$From |a(L1)exp=0.61 {I12}, |a(L2)exp=1.3 {I2} and |a(L3)exp=0.56 {I11} (1981Ch38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=1.37 {I9}, |a(L12)exp=0.32 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.022 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.089 {I11} and L1/L2=7.5 (1981Ch38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Alternate placement from 2641 is possible based on E|g; however, consideration of final spins populated by other transitions from that level makes placement from the 2641 level less probable. 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.19, |a(L12)exp=0.065 {I10} (1981Ch38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} (1981Ch38). |a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d|?6.2. The decay scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$|g|g coin indicate that the 693|g feeds the 588 level; however, the ce-|g coin results of 1981Ch38 suggest that the 693|g feeds the 393 level. No placement is suggested by 1981Ch38 for this intense |g. The ce-|g coin results of 1981Ch38 appear to be inconsistent with the |g-|g coin of 1971Jo20 and our decay scheme. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2} from 1981Ch38, |a(K)exp=0.044 {I11} from 1971Jo20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.036 {I5}, |a(L12)exp=0.0088 {I13}, |a(L3)exp=0.0022 {I5} and |a(M)exp=0.0023 {I5} (1981Ch38). |a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>3.3. The decay scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2} (1981Ch38) consistent with mult=M1+E2 with |d>5 or with E1+M2 with |d=0.24 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$This intense |g is not observed in |g|g or ce-|g coin, which suggests that it feeds the g.s. or an isomeric state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. Other: 68.5 keV {I1} (1972As11) 
RI$From I(|g+ce) and |a. The measured I|g=1.4 {I2} appears to be too large 
TI$From an intensity balance at the 68.5-keV level 
M$From L and M subshell ratios. L2/L3=1.26 {I10} (1972As11), 1.1 (1956St60); M2/M3=0.97 (1956St60); Ice(L23)=28.9 {I12} (1972As11) with I|g=0.93 {I7} gives |a(L23)exp=31.1 {I26} (theory: |a(L23)=30.1, L2/L3=1.14, M2/M3=1.09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From adopted gammas. |g masked by a strong 168.7|g in {+211}Rn |e decay. 
RI$From I(167.90|g)/I(236.48|g)=1.04 {I8} in {+207}Po adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0086 {I9}; A{-2}=0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}. The A{-2} coefficient is not consistent with the proposed assignment, due to a loss of alignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.024 {I3}; A{-2}=0.09 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2}. The A{-2} coefficient is not consistent with the proposed assignment, due to a loss of alignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed. Existence inferred from 719.5|g-198.4|g coin 
TI$From I(|g+ce)(465.4|g)/I(|g+ce)(3.4|g)=2 in 1985Ra18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E transition not seen. Energy from energy level difference 
TI$I(|g+ce)(585 to 2+)/I(|g+ce)(1272 to 0+)|<0.30 (1985Ra21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1982Dr02, 1982Dr10 based on observation of M- and N-subshell ce lines. 1979RaZN obtained E|g=4.0 {I2} based on analysis of energy sums for six |g cascades 
M from subshell data of 1982Dr02, 1982Dr10 
TI from intensity balance at the 1528 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.100 {I12} (1981Va26), 0.095 {I5} (1985Ra21) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1985AkZZ), |d is consistent with the value from |a(K)exp for J(2041)=5, 6, or 7. |d is negative for J=5 or 6, and positive for J=7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I3} (1981Va26), 0.0033 {I2} (1985Ra21) 
MR$|d=+0.020 {I+14-37} from |g|g(|q) (1985AkZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0160 {I17} (1981Va26), 0.019 {I2} (1985Ra21) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1985AkZZ). |d=-0.25 {I4} for J=5, +0.41 {I9} for J=6, and +0.24 {I5} for J=7. |d<0.8 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$EKC|<0.0033 (1983DzZW) allows mult=E2 or E1 but the placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$EKC|<0.0029 (1983DzZW) allows mult=E2 or E1 but the placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
M$EKC|<0.0042 (1983DzZW) allows mult=E1 or E2(+E2). The placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0045 {I11} (1981Va26) allows mult=M1+E2 or E1+M2. The placement in the decay scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=0 from |g(|q). Mult from |g(lin pol) 
MR$the alternate solution of 2.4 {I6} is ruled out by |a(K)exp in other datasets 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$the authors give mult=(E1), from linear polarization; however, this assignment is mutually inconsistent with mult(1077|g)=(M1+E2) since these transitions feed levels with |p=+ and |p=(+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+208}At |e decay. 1985Ra21 report 4.0 {I2} from differences of energy sums 
M from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M mult=E2 from |a(K). |g(|q) suggests the transition is dipole. 1978Be39 assign mult=E1 and suggest large |a(K) is due to an impurity peak of unknown origin lying just above the 856|g and barely discernible in a high-resolution spectrum. Mult=E1 from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.7 (1978Be39) allows mult=E1, E2, or M1. |g(|q) rules out mult=Q. Mult=M1 from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$no transition to the 2+ level is seen (E|g=585 from the level energy difference), I|g<0.3I|g(1272|g) (1976Ju03). Note that 1970Go09 report Ice(K)/Ice(K)(1273)=0.86 {I11} for E|g=575 {I7}, apparently incorrectly interpreted by these authors as the 0+ to 2+ cascade transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from 1976Ju03 
Monopole strength, |r=0.030 to 0.037 
M strong ce transition, no photons (1976Ju03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.019 (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=0.0178 {I11} and |a(L)exp=0.0054 {I5} (1973Af01) A{-2}=-0.50 {I7} (1987Si14), A{-2}=-0.335 {I2} and A{-4}=-0.128 {I2} (1983Ha51) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay; A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1974Be74), A{-2}=+24 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1968Ya08) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.014 {I4} (1974Ja26); |a(K)exp|?0.08, |a(L)exp=0.016 {I5} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I8} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.005 {I3} from 1971Al31, |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.00067 {I17} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0091 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0019 {I2} (1974Ja26), |a(K)exp=0.0100 {I8} (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=0.0089 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.00184 {I21} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay; A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1974Be74), A{-2}=+0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1968Ya08) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.76 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.136 {I10} (1974Ja26), |a(K)exp=0.75 {I10} (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=0.79 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.17 {I3} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay |d; sign from |d=-0.1 {I5} by |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0028 {I8} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 
MR$sign from |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(L12)exp/|a(L3)exp=1.34 {I10} (1974Ja26), |a(L)exp=8.7 {I11} (1973Af01) and |a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp=1.25 {I6} (1971Al31) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay; A{-2}=+0.27 {I3} (1976Ha56) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.17 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.22 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.061 {I7} (1974Ja26), |a(K)exp=1.18 {I10} (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=1.21 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.24 {I3} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 
MR$From ce data. Sign from |d=+0.090 {I6} by |g|g(|q) (1985BuZQ) and +0.08 {I5} by |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.19 {I2} (1974Ja26), |a(K)exp=0.20 {I9} (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=0.19 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.028 {I7} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0046 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.00094 {I32} (1974Ja26), |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I15} (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.00067 {I17} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.005 {I1} (1974Ja26), |a(K)exp=0.038 {I3} (1971Al31), |a(K)exp=0.041 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0069 {I15} (1973Af01) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.029 {I8} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.022 {I5} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0044 {I10} (tentative) from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.0044 {I10} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I3}, pol=0.15 {I8} from 2000Po03 in ({+9}Be,4n|g) 
MR$from 1974Be74 in (|a,3n|g). Other: |d=1.67 {I16} from 1974Be74 in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} (1974Be74) in (|a,3n|g). 
RI$I(137|g)/I(694|g)=66/100 from (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I15} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp|?0.027 from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0183 from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.018 (tentative) from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.024 {I4} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay. K-conversion electrons of 551.0|g and 552.5|g are not resolved. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.031 {I5} from 1974Ja26 and |a(K)exp=0.018 {I5} from 1973Af01 for the 596.2|g doublet in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0033 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00050 {I7} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I4} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00056 {I14} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0033 {I4} from 1974Ja26, 0.0025 {I13} from 1971Al31, |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I3} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.09 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.30 {I26}, pol=0.4 {I8} from 2000Po03 in ({+9}Be,4n|g), A{-2}=+0.46 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} from 1974Be74 in (|a,3n|g). T{-1/2} rules out mult=M3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.086 {I10} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.070 {I25} from 1971Al31 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0090 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I4} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.0085 {I17} from 1971Al31, |a(K)exp=0.0059 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.00081 {I21} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay. |d=2.2 {I6} from |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.019 {I6} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.0069 {I15} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.00116 from 1973Af01, A{-2}=+0.349 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I25} from 1983Ha51 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.005 {I1} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.005 {I3} from 1971Al31, |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I7} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.319 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I13} from 1983Ha51 and |a(K)exp=0.00087 {I40} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp|?0.00076 from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0030 {I8} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.0140 {I14} from 1973Af01, sign of mixing ratio from |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0071 {I20} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp|?0.0094 from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I4} from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp=0.00102 {I22} from 1973Af01 in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 
MR$from |g(|q,t) (1987Si14) in {+209}At |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I4}, pol=-0.46 {I17} from 2000Po03 in ({+9}Be,4n|g), A{-2}=-0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} from 1974Be74 in (|a,3n|g) 
MR$from 1974Be74 in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.10 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I10}, pol=0.48 {I34} from 2000Po03 in ({+9}Be,4n|g); A{-2}=+0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I7} from 1974Be74 in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.019 from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0178 {I11}, |a(L)exp=0.0054 {I5} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=-0.50 {I7} (1987Si14) 
$A2=-0.335 2, A4=-0.128 2 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I5} from 1974Ja26, |a(L)exp|?0.0034 from 1973Af01, A{-2}=+0.5 {I7} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.106 25, A4=-0.043 46 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.014 {I4} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp|?0.08, |a(L)exp=0.016 {I5} from 1973Af01 
$A2=-0.379 26, A4=+0.054 45 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I8} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.005 {I3} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.00067 {I17} from 1973Af01; A{-2}=-0.314 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.285 {I16} from 1983Ha51 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0068 {I20} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp|?0.0094 from 1973Af01 
$A2=-0.132 30, A4=+0.234 54 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0091 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0019 {I2} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.0100 {I8} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0089 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.00184 {I21} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=-0.433 (1987Si14) 
$A2=-0.339 2, A4=-0.126 2 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.76 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.136 {I10}, |a(M)exp=0.028 {I10} (tentative) from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.75 {I10} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.79 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.17 {I3} from 1973Af01. A{-2}=+0.5 {I4} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.154 14, A4=+0.096 23 (1983Ha51) 
MR$-0.1 {I5} from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.027 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0028 {I8} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.92 {I22} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.899 11, A4=+0.184 15 (1983Ha51) 
MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14). |a(K)exp of 1973Af01 is consistent with pure M1; however, the ce(K) line is not fully resolved from ce(L)(790|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I(|g+ce)=22 {I1} in 1971Al31 
M$from |a(L12)exp/|a(L3)exp=1.34 {I10} (1974Ja26), |a(L)exp=8.7 {I11} (1973Af01), |a(L2)exp/|a(L3)exp=1.25 {I6} (1971Al31) 
$A2=-0.016 1, A4=+0.004 3 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$1.4 {I1} from 1971Al31. 1973Af01 propose a doublet at E|g=113 based on conversion data arguments. The evaluators feel that the data are consistent with a single transition. No doublet is reported by 1974Ja26 
M$from |a(L1)exp=2.4 {I4} from 1971Al31 A{-2}=+0.4 {I4} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.181 6, A4=+0.021 10 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$1973Af01 report two |g-rays at E=112.6 {I3} and 113.35 {I30} with I(112.6|g)=0.120 {I19}, I(113.35|g)=0.144 {I16}. 1974Ja26 report no evidence for a doublet. 
M$from |a(K)exp=1.0 {I6} (1971Al31), one gets mult=M1+E2 with |d=3.1 {I4}. The uncertainty in I(ce(K)) due to the required window absorption correction is not included. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.17 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.22 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.061 {I7} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=1.18 {I10} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=1.21 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.24 {I3} from 1973Af01. A{-2}=+0.15 {I5} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.176 2, A4=+0.009 2 (1983Ha51) 
MR$+0.090 {I6} in |g|g(|q) (1985BuZQ) and +0.08 {I5} from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.19 {I2} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.20 {I9} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.19 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.028 {I7} from 1973Af01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0046 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.00094 {I32} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.0030 {I15} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.00067 {I17} from 1973Af01 
$A2=-0.357 10, A4=-0.144 16 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.005 {I1} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.038 {I3} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.041 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0069 {I15} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.28 {I8} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.220 3, A4=+0.018 3 (1983Ha51) 
MR$0.00 {I4} from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0183 from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.018 (tentative) from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.024 {I4} from 1973Af01. K-conversion electrons of 551.0|g and 552.5|g are not resolved. 1974Ja26 and 1971Al31 assume mult(551|g)=E2. 
$A2=-0.200 6, A4=-0.027 2 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0033 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00050 {I7} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I4} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00056 {I14} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.13 {I4} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.155 1, A4=+0.011 2 (1983Ha51) 
MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0033 {I4} from 1974Ja26; 0.0025 {I13} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I3} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.18 {I13} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.329 8, A4=+0.017 12 (1983Ha51) 
MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.003 {I1} from 1973Af01, |a(K)exp<0.003 from 1971Al31 
$A2=-0.345 18, A4=+0.047 30 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$K-conversion electrons of 551.0|g and 552.5|g are not resolved. 1974Ja26 and 1971Al31 assume mult=E2 for the 551|g, as required by the decay scheme, and deduce |a(K)(552|g)=0.086 {I10} and 0.070 {I25}, respectively, giving mult(552|g)=M1(+E2). 
$A2=-0.643 26, A4=+0.313 43 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0090 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I4} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.0085 {I17} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0059 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.00081 {I21} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.83 {I12} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.866 5, A4=+0.097 8 (1983Ha51) 
MR$2.2 {I6} from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 (tentative) from 1974Ja26, K-conversion electrons of 1147.6|g and 1148.8|g are not resolved. 1974Ja26 assumed mult(1148.8|g)=E1 and divided the I(ceK) intensity accordingly. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.00116 from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.4 {I4} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.349 14, A4=-0.012 25 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.005 {I1} (tentative) from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.005 {I3} from 1971Al31; |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I7} from 1973Af01. K-conversion electrons of 1147.6|g and 1148.8|g are not resolved. 1974Ja26 assumed mult(1148.8|g)=E1, divided the I(ceK) intensity accordingly, and deduced |a(K)(1147.6|g). 
$A2=+0.631 13, A4=+0.059 19 (1983Ha51) 
RI$from 1974Ja26. 2.4 {I1} from 1971Al31 and 2.4 {I2} from 1973Af01 are for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00087 {I40} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp|?0.00076 from 1973Af01, A{-2}=+0.36 {I20} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.319 8, A4=+0.020 13 (1983Ha51) 
MR$0.0 {I2} from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.013 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0030 {I8} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.0140 {I14} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=-0.54 {I26} (1987Si14) 
$A2=-0.192 10, A4=+0.386 17 (1983Ha51) 
MR$sign from |g(|q,T) (|d=+4.7 {I+390-18}) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0071 {I20} (tentative) from 1974Ja26, |a(K)exp|?0.0036 from 1973Af01, A{-2}=+0.6 {I3} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.884 17, A4=+0.130 26 (1983Ha51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I4} from 1974Ja26; |a(K)exp=0.00102 {I22} from 1973Af01 A{-2}=+0.2 {I2} (1987Si14) 
$A2=+0.258 10, A4=+0.040 17 (1983Ha51) 
MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Si14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: E|g=540.3 keV {I4} from |a|g-coin by 2000He17, but the energy is inconsistent with E|g=545.0 keV {I1} from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1974Be74) and A{-2}=0.24 {I2}; , A{-4}=0.01 {I3} (1968Ya08) are consistent with stretched quadrupole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1974Be74) and A{-2}=0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} (1968Ya08) are consistent with stretched quadrupole. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and conversion coefficient 
TI$from intensity balance at 1472.7 (I(|g+ce)|>66) and at 1417.8 (I(|g+ce)|<79), with internal conversion taken into account for all transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.84 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I6}, |d=0.53 {I5} or 1.67 {I16} (1974Be74). 1974Be74 choose mult=M1+E2 rather than E1+M2 based on expectation from theory of 19/2- but not 19/2+ level at this energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=3.9 {I8} based on intensity balance at the 2030 level in a delayed spectrum (1974Be74). A{-2}=-0.31 {I8} and A{-4}=+0.02 {I10} consistent with stretched dipole (1974Be74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} (1974Be74). But 1974Be74 gives mult=M1+E2 with |d=0.21 {I6}, inconsistent with the J|p predictions of 21/2- to 17/2-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$The author of 1974Be74 has seen a peak at E|g=985 keV but not placed it. The evaluators made this placement based on adopted level scheme, assuming an uncertainty of 1 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.46 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}, consistent with octupole transition (1974Be74). M3 is excluded because it would imply a too long half-life. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=1.6 {I4} based on intensity balance at the 2770 level in a delayed spectrum (1974Be74). A{-2}=-0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I7} consistent with stretched dipole (1974Be74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} consistent with stretched dipole with a small quadrupole admixture (1974Be74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=0.2 {I4} based on intensity balance at the 4169 level in a delayed spectrum (1974Be74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$A comparison of the I|g and I(|g+ce) is consistent with mult=E1 not with M1. M1 given in the 2000Po03 could be a typo since it is inconsistent with the spin-party assignments of the connecting levels. 
RI$I(|g+ce)=30 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}(245|g) (1181|g)(|q)=0.092 {I22} (1963Sc15) scin 
|a(K)exp=0.110 {I13}, |a(L)exp=0.102 {I18} 
L1+L2/L3=2.32 {I24} (1972Ja12), 2.1 (1954Mi70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1958Ho71. Others: 46.4 {I3} (1968Pr03), 46.6 {I2} (1972Ja12) 
RI from I(ce(L) 46|g)=26.3 (1958Ho71), |a(L)(E2)=200. Other: 0.110 {I16} (1968Pr03) semi 
L1+L2/L3=1.01 {I8} (1972Ja12), 1.1 {I1} (1968Pr03). Others: 1954Mi70, 1958Ho71 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1976BaYH. Others: 83.44 {I8} (1958Ho71), 83.67 (1970BeZQ) 
RI from I(|g+ce)(83|g)=I(|g+ce)(631|g+881|g) for level intensity balance 
L2/L3=1.24 (1954Mi70); L1/L2/L3=4 {I1}/131 {I10}/100 {I6} (1976BaYH) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from I(|g+ce)(92|g)=I(|g+ce)(2290|g) for level intensity balance 
I(ce) L2,L3 lines predominant (1958Ho71) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E from E(ce L1)=60.2 (1972Ja12). Other: 77.20 (1976BaYH) 
RI from I(|g+ce)(77|g)|?0.15 (1972Ja12), 0.16 {I4} (1976BaYH) 
L1/L2/M=100 {I10}/14 {I3}/29 {I7} (1976BaYH) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E other: 116.1 {I1} (1958Ho71) 
|a(L)exp=1.22 {I14}, |a(M)exp=0.30 {I4} 
K/L=5.8 (1958Ho71), L1/L2=9 (1954Mi70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I|g(660.1|g) from {+208}Po was subtracted 
E$Placement from the level scheme (1971Fa18). In the text some discussion of 661.1|g under section 3.2. and the 2187.9 keV level appears to be a typo. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)(48|g)/I(|g+ce)(1523|g)=1.55 {I15} (1971Bl07) from delayed |g-spectra. 
RI$from I(|g+ce)(48|g)/I(|g+ce)(1523|g)=1.55 {I15} and |a(48|g)=239. 
E from |DE(levels) 
RI from delayed |g-spectrum of 51-ns isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from ce(K)/ce(L) exp=3.9 {I9}, |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2} (1985Ka07). 
RI I|g(405|g)/I|g(686|g)=0.23 {I2} (1985Ka07). 
A{-2}=0.43 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(280|g)/I|g(686|g)=0.064 {I14} (1985Ka07). 
M from ce(K)/ce(L) exp=3.9 {I7}, |a(K)exp=2.0 {I6} (1985Ka07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Placement in the decay scheme is uncertain. |g ray was detected in experiments with 15- and 17-MeV triton projectiles only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI measured intensity has been reduced by 8% for contribution from the 201.8|g deexciting the 3727.3-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E4)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^8
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE4;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE4W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g not observed, deduced from level scheme (1989Ku08). 
M$ Weisskopf estimates suggest E4 or M4; |DJ|p from shell model prediction suggests E4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
M$From |g(|q) and |g-ray transition intensity balance in {+208}Pb({+9}Be,|a2n|g), {+208}Pb({+7}Li,p3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 686.7 {I5} (1978Ya04), 670 (1959Ka17), 671 {I5} (1954Mi70) 
RI$weighted average of 83 {I2} (1985La17) and 79 {I4} (1975Ja04), measured relative to I(569.65|g,{+207}Pb)=100. 
CC$|a(K)exp=0.0043 {I6} measured relative to |a(K)(569.65|g,E2 in {+207}Pb)=0.01583. (Theory: |a(K)=0.0438) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$See comment on decay scheme normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.088 {I10}, K/L=3.9 {I9} (1978Av01), K/L=4.3 (1956Kr57). Other: 1963Da11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.05 {I5} (1992Li05), 1.102 {I13} (1984Ge07), 1.07 {I5} (1983Sc13): I|g(785|g)=1.100 {I12}/0.6406=1.72 {I2}. 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) (1982Be09,1961Gi05); M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.033 {I5} (1978Av01). Others: 1963Da11, 1957Vo22 
MR$other: 0.04 {I3} (1961Gi05) 
$(727.3|g)(785.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.313 {I18}, A{-4}=0.017 {I26} (1982Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) (1982Be09); M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.025 (1963Da11,1957Vo22). 
$(727.3|g)(893.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.284 {I37}, A{-4}=-0.042 {I52} (1982Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.44 {I9} (1992Li05), 1.49 {I3} (1984Ge07), 1.38 {I8} (1983Sc13): I|g(1620.5|g)=1.47 {I3}/0.6406=2.29 {I5}. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0050 (1963Da11), 0.0062 (1957Vo22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) (1982Be09); (M1+E2) from |a(K)exp=0.039 (1957Vo22) 
$(727.3|g)(952.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.474 {I59}, A{-4}=0.097 {I82} (1982Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$other: E|g=190, I|g=0.3 (1960Gi07) 
RI$measured relative to I|g(176.68 {+212}Pb |b{+-} decay) (1982Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(1078.62)/I|g(1073.6)=35.7 {I35} (1982Be09) 
M$measured Ice (|a(K)exp|<0.2 (1963Da11), |a(K)exp=0.2 (1957Vo22)) are in disagreement with this assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$no photon observed 
TI$Ice(K) measured relative to Ice(K)(2614.5|g {+208}Pb), corrected for Ice(K)(1806|g), Ice(L+M+)(1800.2|g), pair production (1982Be09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.555 {I41} (1992Li05), 0.563 {I19} (1984Ge07), 0.58 {I4} (1983Sc13): I|g(1078.6|g)=0.564 {I16}/0.6406=0.88 {I3}. 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) (1982Be09); (M1+E2) from |a(K)exp=0.014 (1963Da11,1957Vo22) 
$(727.3|g)(1078.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.147 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I39} (1982Be09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$(Ice(K)=0.003 {I1} (1963Da11))/(I|g=0.14 {I3}) gives |a(K)exp=0.02 {I1}, not in agreement with E2 assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|g ray observed as a doublet with a 405 keV |g in {+213}At. Relative intensity deduced from coincidence experiments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R{-ADO}=1.24 {I27} 
M$E1 is suggested by 2010As03, as M1 or E2 multipolarities would lead to unexpectedly large transition strengths. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M,CC$|a(exp) suggest M1+E2 with with |d|?1, however, this is rejected by RUL. Only E1 is allowed when compared with RUL. 2010As03 state that the conversion coefficients are anomalous as they are emitted from states with very large dipole moments. 
$R{-ADO}=1.28 {I7} 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I6} 
CC$measured value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M,CC$|a(exp) suggest M1+E2 with with |d|?1, however, this is rejected by RUL. Only E1 is allowed when compared with RUL. 2010As03 state that the conversion coefficients are anomalous as they are emitted from states with very large dipole moments. 
$R{-ADO}=1.22 {I6} 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I7} 
CC$measured value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from the linear polarization measurements in 2021Fe09. The polarization coefficient was not presented due to the low statistcs. The assignment was based on the differences between the yields for Compton scattering parallel and perpendicular to the reaction plane observed in the related spectra. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from comparison of transition strengths, 2022Za05 note that suppressed E1 or E2 cannot be ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 292.76 {I5} (1998Ar03), 292.81 {I1} (2000Gr35), 292.86 {I10} (1977Vy02), and 292.80 {I1} (1989Ko26). 
RI Weighted average of 0.413 {I23} (1998Ar03 - 0.416 {I23}), 0.429 {I7} (1986He06), 0.41 {I1} (2000Gr35 - 0.40 {I1}), 0.31 {I4} (2002Mo46), 0.403 {I23} (1981Di14 - 0.426 {I24}), 0.41 {I2} (1989Ko26). 
M,MR From |a(K)exp=0.24 {I7} (1998MaZO), mixing ratio was deduced using the briccMixing code. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 147.1 {I1} (2000Gr35), 147.63 {I8} (1989Ko26) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.0147 {I12} (1998Ar03 - 0.0148 {I12}) and 0.022 {I8} (2000Gr35). Others: 0.011 {I1} (1989Ko26). 
M B(E2)=0.0031 {I6} (1997Wa27) is close to the B(E2, 2+ to 0+) values of the neighboring nuclei. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 440.43 {I5} (1998Ar03) and 440.44 {I1} (2000Gr35), 440.420 {I20} (1977Vy02), 440.46 {I1} (1989Ko26). Other: 440.4 (2003ChZV). 
RI$ Weighted average of 26.2 {I3} (2010Fi10), 26.1 {I3} (1986He06), 25.4 {I3} (2000Gr35), and 25.8 {I3} (2020Go11). Others: 21 {I1} (1989Ko26 quoted from 1969Dz06), 27.4 (1981Di14), |J25.4 (2003ChZV). 
M,MR$From |a{-K}=I{-e}/I{-|g}=[3.15 {I15} (1969DzZZ)/25.9 {I2}]=0.12 {I1}. Other conversion electron measurements in 1967LoZZ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 600.7 {I3} (1998Ar03) and 601.0 {I2} (2000Gr35). 
RI$From 2000Gr35 (0.0042 {I8}). Other: 0.00069 {I22} (1998Ar03 - 0.00070 {I22}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 574.8 {I3} (1998Ar03), and 575.2 {I5} (2000Gr35). 
RI From 2000Gr35. Other: 0.00063 {I17} (1998Ar03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 867.98 {I3} (1998Ar03) and 867.93 {I3} (2000Gr35). Other: 867.9 (2003ChZV). 
RI Weighted average of 0.0110 {I11} (1998Ar03 - 0.0111 {I11}) and 0.0125 {I11} (2000Gr35 - 0.0123 {I11}), 0.0117 {I8} (2003ChZV - 0.0115 {I8}), and 0.023 {I13} (2002Mo46). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E From 2000Gr35. Others: 710.81 {I21} (1998Ar03), 710.8 {I1} (1989Ko26), 710.8 (2003ChZV). 
RI Weighted average of 0.0101 {I11} (1998Ar03 - 0.0102 {I11}), 0.0121 {I10} (2000Gr35 - 0.0119 {I10}), and 0.015 {I8} (2002Mo46), 0.0118 {I8} (2003ChZV - 0.116 probably is a misprint of 0.0116 {I8}), 0.011 {I1} (1989Ko26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 1003.58 {I3} (1998Ar03), 1003.59 {I3} (2000Gr35), 1003.57 {I3} (1989Ko26). Other: 1003.6 (2003ChZV). 
RI Weighted average of 0.050 {I5} (1998Ar03), 0.054 {I3} (2000Gr35 - 0.053 {I3}), and 0.04 {I1} (2002Mo46). Others: 0.0565 {I13} (2003ChZV - 0.0554 {I13}), 0.043 {I4} (1989Ko26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Others: 1045.10 {I40} (2000Gr35), 1045.7 (2003ChZV). 
RI Others: 0.015 {I3} (2003ChZV - 0.15 probably is a misprint), 0.035 {I19} (2000Gr35 - 0.034 {I19}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 659.77 {I2} (1994Ar23) and 659.74 {I2} (2000Gr35), 659.81 {I10} (1977Vy02). Others: 659.8 {I1} (1989Ko26), 659.5 (2003ChZV), 659.77 {I5} (1998Ar03) (not listed earlier) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.0358 {I20} (1998Ar03 - 0.0361 {I20}), 0.035 {I11} (2002Mo46), 0.044 {I3} (2000Gr35 - 0.044 {I3}), and 0.05 {I2} (1969ArZV - 0.04 {I2}), 0.043 {I4} (2003ChZV - 0.042 {I4}), 0.031 {I3} (1989Ko26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Others: 807.37 {I1} (2000Gr35), 807.38 {I5} (1998Ar03), 807.355 {I37} (1977Vy02), 807.4 (2003ChZV). 
RI Weighted average of 0.290 {I12} (1986He06 - 0.292 {I12}), 0.289 {I18} (2000Gr35 - 0.283 {I18}), 0.239 {I15} (1998Ar03 - 0.241 {I15}), 0.27 {I2} (2002Mo46), 0.30 {I4} (1969ArZV - 0.24 {I3}), 0.303 {I10} (2003ChZV - 0.297 {I10}), 0.271 {I16} (1989Ko26), 0.299 {I7} (1981Di14 - 0.316 {I7}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1100.18 {I2} (2000Gr35), 1100.12 {I5} (1998Ar03), 1100.16 {I2} (1989Ko26), 1100.14 {I6} (1977Vy02). Other: 1100.2 (2003ChZV). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.257 {I16} (1998Ar03 - 0.259 {I16}), 0.256 {I15} (2000Gr35 - 0.251 {I17}), 0.259 {I7} (1981Di14 - 0.274 {I7}), 0.284 {I17} (1989Ko26), 0.219 {I12} (2003ChZV - 0.215 {I12}), and 0.23 {I2} (2002Mo46). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 826.59 {I5} (2000Gr35), 826.8 {I2} (1989Ko26), 826.47 {I6} (1998Ar03). Other: 826.5 (2003ChZV). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.0077 {I13} (2000Gr35 - 0.0077 {I13}), 0.0075 {I5} (2003ChZV - 0.0074 {I5}), 0.0057 {I5} (1998Ar03), and 0.0070 {I7} (1989Ko26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 1119.50 {I4} (2000Gr35), 1119.29 {I5} (1998Ar03), 1119.4 {I1} (1989Ko26). Other: 1119.3 (2003ChZV). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.050 {I3} (1998Ar03), 0.052 {I3} (2000Gr35 - 0.051 {I3}), 0.053 {I4} (2003ChZV - 0.052 {I4}), 0.04 {I1} (2002Mo46), and 0.062 {I6} (1989Ko26). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=1.5 {I5} (0.15 {I5} in 2011As05 probably a misprint). 
M$Proposed by 2011As05 based on |a(exp), extracted from intensity imbalances measured in spectra in double coincidence with the 146 keV transition and either the 423 or the 646 keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 609.31 {I16} (1982Ak03), 609.32 {I2} (1989Si17), 609.313 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 609.329 {I7} (2002MoZP). Other: 609.37 {I16} (1952Mu45), 609 {I3} (1967Bu17) and 609.3 {I3} (1967Ma51). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0152 {I5}; K/L=3.63 {I20}; K/M|?11.5 (1960Lu07); other: |a(K)exp=0.015 (1967Ma51); K/L=3.43 {I10} and K/M=9.2 {I10} (1960Ma05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 405.9 {I4} (1969Li10), 405.82 {I17} (1982Ak03), 405.74 {I3} (1989Si17) and 405.71 {I2} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05{I6} (1989Ta15). 
RI$weighted average of 0.38 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.36 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.37 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.39 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 665.6 {I2} (1969Li10), 665.47 {I16} (1982Ak03), 665.453 {I22} (1989Si17), 665.49 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 665.444 {I10} (2002MoZP). Other: 670 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 665.8 {I5} (1967Ma51). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I6} (1986Ta16) and |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I17} deduced from I(ce)665|g/I(ce)609|g=0.010 {I4} (1960Lu07). 
RI$weighted average of 3.36 {I37} (1982Ak03), 3.39 {I11} (1989Si17), 3.51 {I20} (1994Mo06), 3.42 {I8} (1998Mo14), 3.33 {I10} (2000Sa32), 3.386 {I21} (2002MoZP) and 3.42 {I6} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 768.4 {I2} (1969Li10), 768.36 {I16} (1982Ak03), 768.361 {I18} (1989Si17), 768.356 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 768.362 {I7} (2002MoZP). Other: 768.8 {I5} (1967Ma51) and 770 {I4} (1967Bu17) 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0112 {I8}; K/L=4.1 {I5} (1960Lu07); others: K/L=3.95 {I20} and K/M=10.5 {I15} (1960Ma05); K/L=4.6 {I12} (1957Ni11); |a(K)exp=0.011 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.29 {I6}, A{-4}=0.36 {I10} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 11.9 {I17} (1982Ak03), 10.60 {I19} (1989Si17), 10.91 {I8} (1994Mo06), 10.83 {I22} (1998Mo14), 10.39 {I31} (2000Sa32), 10.77 {I3} (2002MoZP) and 10.68 {I5} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1377.7 {I2} (1969Li10), 1377.65 {I3} (1989Si17), 1377.669 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1377.671 {I12} (2002MoZP). Other: 1380 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1378 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I6} (1960Lu07); other: 0.0027 (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 8.72 {I19} (1989Si17), 8.82 {I12} (1994Mo06), 8.91 {I18} (1998Mo14), 8.52 {I25} (2000Sa32), 8.79 {I3} (2002MoZP) and 8.72 {I4} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 806.2 {I2} (1969Li10), 806.17 {I17} (1982Ak03), 806.174 {I18} (1989Si17), 806.18 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 806.181 {I10} (2002MoZP). Other: 806.5 {I5} (1967Ma51). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0073 {I12} (1960Lu07); other: |a(K)exp=0.083 (1967Ma51); K/L=3.0 {I15} (1957Ni11); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=1.27 {I4} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 2.92 {I43} (1982Ak03), 2.67 {I6} (1989Si17), 2.90 {I22} (1994Mo06), 2.81 {I24} (1998Mo14), 2.76 {I11} (2000Sa32), 2.777 {I14} (2002MoZP) and 2.791 {I20} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. ce measurement: 1415.9 (1954Ml77, 1960Lu07). 
TI$weighted average of 1.14 {I4} from I(ce(K) 1415)/I(ce(K) 609|g)=25.0/45.0 {I15}=0.651 {I19} (1960Lu07) with |a(K)/|a(tot)(1415)=0.8536 and |a(K)(609|g)=0.01489 {I21}; and 1.08 {I5} from I(ce(L) 1415)/I(ce(K) 609|g)=4.76 {I20}/45.0 {I15}=0.106 {I4} (1960Lu07) with |a(L)/|a(tot)(1415)=0.1465 and |a(K)(609|g)=0.01489 {I21}. 
M$from ce measurement 1960Lu07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 268.57 {I20} (1982Ak03), 269.0 {I7} (1989Si17) and 268.60 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.031 {i8} (1982Ak03), 0.06 {i2} (1989Si17), 0.035 {i4} (1994Mo06) and 0.059 {i28} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 528.42 {I24} (1982Ak03), 528 {I1} (1989Si17) and 528.29 {I8} (1993Di09). 
RI$weighted average of 0.025 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.009 {I4} (1989Si17) and 0.022 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 934.0 {I2} (1969Li10), 934.052 {20} (1989Si17), 934.061 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 934.054 {I8} (2002MoZP). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0188 {I9}; K/L=5.3 {I7} (1960Lu07); K/L=5.4 {I3} (1957Ni11); others: |a(K)exp=0.0188 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=0.06 {I8} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 7.0 {I9} (1982Ak03), 6.87 {I13} (1989Si17), 6.81 {I14} (1998Mo14), 6.88 {I5} (1994Mo06), 6.70 {I20} (2000Sa32), 6.83 {I4} (2002MoZP) and 6.78 {I3} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1543.3 {I4} (1969Li10), 1543.32 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1543.38 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1541 {I15} (1966Hu03), 1540 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1544 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.77 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.68 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.67 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1052.0 {I3} (1969Li10), 1051.96 {I3} (1989Si17) and1051.97 {I15} (1993Di09, 1994Mo06). Other: 1052.4 {I1.5} (1967Ma51) 
RI$weighted average of 0.68 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.66 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.72 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1661.4 {I2} (1969Li10), 1661.28 {I6} (1989Si17), 1661.29 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1661.272 {I17} (2002MoZP). Other: 1662 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1661 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 2.49 {I9} (1989Si17), 2.33 {I12} (1994Mo06), 2.38 {I10} (1998Mo14), 2.37 {I22} (2000Sa32), 2.299 {I14} (2002MoZP) and 2.28 {I3} (2004Mo07). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0026 (1967Ma51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 698.4 {I4} (1969Li10), 697.83 {I17} (1982Ak03), 697.90 {I25} (1989Si17) and 697.87 {I10} (1993Di09, 1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.14 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.081 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.14 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.150 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1104.0 {I4} (1969Li10), 1103.7 {I3} (1989Si17), 1103.64 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.21 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.21 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.24 {I7} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 455.0 {I3} (1969Li10), 455.26 {I17} (1982Ak03), 454.77 {I12} (1989Si17) and 454.79 {I2} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.69 {I3} (1989Si17), 0.64 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.59 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1120.4 {I2} (1969Li10), 1120.276 {I22} (1989Si17), 1120.287 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1120.301 {I8} (2002MoZP). Other: 1120.8 {I5} (1967Ma51), 1120 {I3} (1967Bu17) and 1120 {I2} (1969La03). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.00118 {I5}; K/L=6.0 {I4} (1960Lu07); K/L=5.6 {I2} (1957Ni11); others: |a(K)exp=0.0154 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.109 {I6}, A{-4}=0.011 {I11} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 32.6 {I6} (1989Si17), 33.13 {I22} (1994Mo06), 33.1 {I6} (1998Mo14), 32.3 {I10} (2000Sa32), 32.77 {I12} (2002MoZP) and 32.74 {I10} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1729.8 {I2} (1969Li10), 1729.60 {I5} (1989Si17), 1729.595 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1729.592 {I19} (2002MoZP). Other: 1730 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1730 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I4} (1960Lu07) and 0.002 (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 6.61 {I13} (1989Si17), 6.60 {I4} (1994Mo06), 6.27 {I15} (1998Mo14), 6.33 {I15} (2000Sa32), 6.25 {I3} (2002MoZP) and 6.22 {I3} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1133.8 {I3} (1969Li10), 1133.66 {I3} (1989Si17) and 1133.73 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.55 {I2} (1989Si17), 0.56 {I3} (1994Mo06) and 0.57 {I3} (2000Sa32). 
M$|g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.54 {I10}, A{-4}=1.1 {I2} (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 221.57 {I24} (1982Ak03) and 221 {I1} (1989Si17). 
RI$from 1989Si17; others: 0.012 (1982Ak03) and 0.130 {I13} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 348.8 {I5} (1989Si17) and 348.92 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.17 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.34 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.20 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 386.8 {I8} (1969Li10), 386.72 {I19} (1982Ak03), 387.0 {I3} (1989Si17) and 386.77 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 386.9 {I10} (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 0.64 {I10} (1982Ak03), 0.79 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.63 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.70 {I15} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1155.3 {I2} (1969Li10), 1155.19 {I2} (1989Si17), 1155.22 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1155.214 {I9} (2002MoZP). Other: 1155.5 {I7} (1967Ma51), 1150 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1155 {I2} (1969La03). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0104 {I12} (1960Lu07); others: |a(K)exp=0.0091 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.54 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 3.67 {I11} (1989Si17), 3.5 {I4} (1994Mo06), 3.61 {I10} (1998Mo14), 3.4 {I7} (2000Sa32), 3.595 {I17} (2002MoZP) and 3.59 {I3} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1764.6 {I2} (1969Li10), 1764.51 {I5} (1989Si17), 1764.494 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1764.485 {I14} (2002MoZP). Other: 1764 {I2} (1967Bu17) and 1764 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I3} (1960Lu07); other: 0.0036 (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 34.5 {I6} (1989Si17), 34.48 {I25} (1994Mo06), 33.9 {I7} (1998Mo14), 33.3 {I10} (2000Sa32), 33.63 {I9} (2002MoZP) and 33.5 {I1} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 470.0 {I3} (1969Li10), 469.78 {I16} (1982Ak03), 469.69 {I12} (1989Si17) and 469.76 {I4} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.30 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.288 {I17} (1989Si17), 0.27 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.34 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 572.6 {I4} (1969Li10), 572.74 {I19} (1982Ak03), 572.83 {I15} (1989Si17) and 572.76 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.17 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.177 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.16 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.16 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 832.0 {I6} (1969Li10), 832.35 {I19} (1982Ak03), 832.35 {I20} (1989Si17) and 832.39 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.064 {I10} (1982Ak03), 0.049 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.062 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.080 {I13} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1238.2 {I2} (1969Li10), 1238.11 {I3} (1989Si17), 1238.110 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1238.131 {I10} (2002MoZP). Other: 1240 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1238 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0113 {I11}, K/L=6.1 {I+1.2-0.9} (1960Lu07); K/L=5.7 {I3} (1957Ni11); others: |a(K)|exp=0.0089 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.272 {I9}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 12.84 {I13} (1989Si17), 12.87 {I9} (1994Mo06), 12.97 {I25} (1998Mo14), 12.7 {I4} (2000Sa32), 12.83 {I6} (2002De03), 12.80 {I4} (2002MoZP) and 12.85 {I5} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1847.6 {I3} (1969Li10), 1847.44 {I5} (1989Si17), 1847.40 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1847.432 {I17} (2002MoZP). Other: 1850 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1848 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 4.61 {I15} (1989Si17), 4.57 {I6} (1994Mo06), 4.51 {I12} (1998Mo14), 4.35 {I13} (2000Sa32), 4.42 {I3} (2002MoZP) and 4.46 {I3} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 615.8 {I6} (1969Li10), 615.49 {I36} (1982Ak03), 615.78 {I6} (1989Si17) and 615.68 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I5} (1982Ak03), 0.15 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.12 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.11 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1281.1 {I2} (1969Li10), 1280.96 {I2} (1989Si17), 1281.05 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1280.981 {I12} (2002MoZP). Other: 1280 {I5} (1967Bu17) and 1281 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0094 {I9} (1960Lu07); others: |a(K)exp=0.0082 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.30 {I8}, A{-4}=0.08 {I12} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 3.20 {I11} (1989Si17), 3.17 {I17} (1994Mo06), 3.19 {I11} (1998Mo14), 3.15 {I11} (2000Sa32), 3.159 {I16} (2002MoZP) and 3.15 {I3} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1890.4 {I4} (1969Li10), 1890.35 {I15} (1989Si17) and 1890.25 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1890 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.194 {I23} (1989Si17), 0.17 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.17 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 333.35 {I24} (1982Ak03), 333.61 {I12} (1989Si17) and 333.31 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I3} (1982Ak03), 0.21 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.14 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.13 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 617.01 {I13} (1993Di09), 616.99 {I36} (1982Ak03) and 617.1 {I3} (1989Si17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.066 {I44} (1982Ak03), 0.053 {I6} (1993Di09), 0.075 {I26} (1989Si17), and 0.077 {I11} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 719.9 {I2} (1969Li10), 719.87 {I17} (1982Ak03), 719.86 {I3} (1989Si17) and 719.91 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 720.2 {I8} (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 0.90 {I13} (1982Ak03), 0.87 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.91 {I8} (1994Mo06) and 0.91 {I3} (2000Sa32). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0099 (1967Ma51). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1385.4 {I3} (1969Li10), 1385.31 {I3} (1989Si17), 1385.30 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1385.310 {I14} (2002MoZP). Other: 1380 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1385 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 1.68 {I6} (1989Si17), 1.81 {I3} (1994Mo06), 1.76 {I5} (2000Sa32) and 1.755 {I16} (2002MoZP). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.19 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I19} (1986Ta16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Di09 and 1994Mo06. 
$I|g(297.81|g)+I|g(297.80|g in {+210}Pb)=0.058 {I10} (2000Sa32) and 0.046 {I11} (1993Di09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 595.24 {I24} (1982Ak03), 596.0 {I8} (1989Si17) and 595.23 {I7} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.035 {I7} (1982Ak03), 0.038 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.039 {I6} (2000Sa32); other: 0.26 {I6} (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 633.6 {I4} (1969Li10), 633.17 {I17} (1982Ak03), 633.14 {I10} (1989Si17) and 633.06 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.12 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.130 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.11 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.130 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1401.6 {I3} (1969Li10), 1401.50 {I4} (1989Si17), 1401.52 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1401.516 {I13} (2002MoZP). Other: 1402 {I2} (1969La03). 
M,MR$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.37 {I2}, A{-4}=0.25 {I4} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 3.01 {I9} (1989Si17), 2.91 {I16} (1994Mo06), 2.96 {I9} (1998Mo14), 3.0 {I4} (2000Sa32), 2.934 {I13} (2002MoZP) and 2.927 {I20} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2011.0 {I6} (1969Li10), 2010.71 {I15} (1989Si17) and 2010.85 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 2011 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.106 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.100 {I5} (1994Mo06) and 0.093 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 252.56 {I30} (1982Ak03), 253 {I1} (1989Si17) and 252.80 {I6} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.033 {I7} (1982Ak03), 0.028 {I4} (1994Mo06) and 0.019 {I7} (2000Sa32); other: 0.006 {I2} (1989Si17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 356.5 {I5} (1989Si17) and 356.00 {I17} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1989Si17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 639 {I1} (1969Li10), 639.62 {I17} (1982Ak03), 639.37 {I20} (1989Si17) and 639.67 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.061 {I11} (1982Ak03), 0.068 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.065 {I10} (1994Mo06) and 0.085 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1408.0 {I2} (1969Li10), 1407.98 {I4} (1989Si17), 1407.99 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1407.989 {I12} (2002MoZP). Other: 1407 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1408 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q) (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 5.37 {I9} (1989Si17), 5.37 {I6} (1994Mo06), 5.38 {I12} (1998Mo14), 5.5 {I5} (2000Sa32), 5.23 {I3} (2002De03), 5.250 {I19} (2002MoZP) and 5.24 {I4} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. ce measurement: 2016.7 (1954Ml77, 1960Lu07) 
TI$from I(ce(K) 2017)/I(ce(K) 609|g)=0.31 {I5}/45.0 {I15}=0.0069 {I11} (1960Lu07) with |a(K)/|a(tot)(2017)=0.8556 and |a(K)(609|g)=0.01489 {I21}; other: 1.0 (1954Ml77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 710.8 {I6} (1969Li10), 710.66 {I17} (1982Ak03), 710.8 {I2} (1989Si17) and 710.67 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 710 {I4} (1967Bu17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.162 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.16 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.170 {I9} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1479.2 {I7} (1969Li10), 1479.22 {I12} (1989Si17) and 1479.15 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 1480 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.149 {I17} (1989Si17), 0.11 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.14 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 388.8 {I8} (1969Li10), 388.98 {I19} (1982Ak03), 389.1 {I3} (1989Si17) and 388.88 {I5} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 389.0 {I10} (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 0.87 {I12} (1982Ak03), 0.90 {I11} (1989Si17), 0.85 {I1} (1994Mo06) and 0.86 {I4} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 703.1 {I2} (1969Li10), 703.06 {I16} (1982Ak03), 703.11 {I4} (1989Si17) and 703.09 {I9} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 703.2 {I8} (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 1.08 {I15} (1982Ak03), 1.02 {I4} (1989Si17), 1.11 {I7} (1994Mo06) and 1.12 {I8} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 740.83 {I20} (1982Ak03), 741.5 {I10} (1989Si17) and 740.73 {I13} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I2} (1982Ak03), 0.09 {I4} (1989Si17), 0.088 {I13} (1994Mo06) and 0.095 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1509.3 {I3} (1969Li10), 1509.19 {I4} (1989Si17), 1509.228 {I15} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1509.198 {I14} (2002MoZP). Other: 1510 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1510 {I2} (1969La03). 
M,MR$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 4.75 {I13} (1989Si17), 4.76 {I5} (1994Mo06), 4.75 {I15} (1998Mo14), 4.63 {I15} (2000Sa32), 4.61 {I6} (2002De03), 4.67 {I3} (2002MoZP) and 4.63 {I6} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2118.7 {I3} (1969Li10), 2118.54 {I8} (1989Si17), 2118.551 {I30} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 2118.483 {I25} (2002MoZP). Other: 2119 (1960Lu07) and 2119 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0033 {I7} (1960Lu07); other: 0.0032 (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 2.62 {I6} (1989Si17), 2.56 {I3} (1994Mo06), 2.55 {I8} (1998Mo14), 2.65 {I25} (2000Sa32), 2.536 {I20} (2002De03), 2.548 {I21} (2002MoZP) and 2.537 {I20} (2004Mo07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 486.3 {I5} (1989Si17) and 486.7 {I3} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 487.1 {I15} (1967Ma51). 
RI$weighted average of 0.064 {I21} (1989Si17) and 0.035 {I20} (2000Sa32); other: <0.012 (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 872.51 {I36} (1982Ak03), 873.0 {I5} (1989Si17) and 873.07 {I19} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.032 {I10} (1982Ak03), 0.036 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.042 {I9} (1994Mo06) and 0.040 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1538.7 {I3} (1969Li10), 1538.50 {I6} (1989Si17) and 1538.66 {I14} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
M$from |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=-0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I6} (1989Si17). 
RI$weighted average of 0.90 {I13} (1989Si17), 0.95 {I6} (1994Mo06) and 0.98 {I5} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2147.7 {I10} (1969Li10), 2147.8 {I4} (1989Si17) and 2148.02 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). Other: 2150 {I7} (1967Bu17) and 2148 {I2} (1969La03). 
RI$weighted average of 0.034 {I6} (1989Si17), 0.029 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.050 {I10} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 428.0 {I5} (1989Si17) and 428.07 {I8} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.023 {I6} (1989Si17) and 0.025 {I3} (2000Sa32); other: <0.0023 (1994Mo06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 649.4 {I4} (1969Li10), 649.22 {I17} (1982Ak03), 649.18 {I7} (1989Si17) and 649.23 {I10} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.114 {I15} (1982Ak03), 0.128 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.13 {I2} (1994Mo06) and 0.10 {I3} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 815 {I1} (1969Li10), 814.86 {I19} (1982Ak03), 815.08 {I15} (1989Si17) and 814.86 {I11} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$weighted average of 0.087 {I13} (1982Ak03), 0.087 {I15} (1989Si17), 0.081 {I8} (1994Mo06) and 0.110 {I20} (2000Sa32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 917.73 {I36} (1982Ak03) and 917.73 {I29} (1993Di09,1994Mo06). 
RI$from 1982Ak03 and 1994Mo06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1583.3 {I3} (1969Li10), 1583.22 {I4} (1989Si17), 1583.21 {I12} (1993Di09,1994Mo06) and 1583.200 {I17} (2002MoZP). Other: 1585 {I4} (1967Bu17) and 1584 {I2} (1969La03). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I9} (1960Lu07); others: |a(K)exp=0.0091 (1967Ma51); |g|g(E2)(|q): A{-2}=0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=0.10 {I6} (1986Ta16). 
RI$weighted average of 1.56 {I6} (1989Si17), 1.58 {I8} (1994Mo06), 1.64 {I17} (2000Sa32) and 1.556 {I13} (2002MoZP). 


