# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.11 {I7} 
RI$Other: 1.00 {I15} (1969La11); 1.25 {I19} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.53 {I11}:0.160 {I24} (1969La11); reported as M1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.57 {I3} 
RI$Other: 0.48 {I7} (1969La11); 0.64 {I12} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)<0.13 (1969La11); reported as E1,E2 in 1969La11. 
MR$Average of deduced upper and lower limits. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=6.6 {I4} 
RI$Other: 6.5 {I7} (1969La11); 7.8 {I5} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.23 {I6}:0.056 {I14} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=3.19 {I19} 
RI$Other: 3.6 {I4} (1969La11); 3.52 {I17} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.076 {I27} (1969La11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=3.11 {I18} 
RI$Other: 3.6 {I4} (1969La11); 3.46 {I17} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.89 {I4} (1969La11); Ice(L1) obscured by Ice(K) (316.5 transition); reported as M1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=5.63 {I16} 
RI$Other: 6.40 {I64} (1969La11); 5.94 {I23} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(L1)=0.17 {I3} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.6 {I2} 
RI$Other: 1.30 {I13} (1969La11); 1.41 {I11} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.94 {I24}:0.130 {I65} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.4 {I3} 
RI$Other: 1.60 {I24} (1969La11) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=2.46 {I62}:0.37 {I11} (1969La11). Reported as complex line in 1969La11; Ice data deduced by evaluator according to I|g(111.7|g) fraction of the I|g(111.7|g+111.8|g)=2.47 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.38 {I8} 
RI$Other: 0.42 {I6} (1969La11); 0.43 {I11} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.22 {I4}:0.066 {I22} (1969La11). Reported as complex line with mult=M1 in 1969La11; Ice data deduced by evaluator according to I|g(176.1|g) fraction of the I|g(176.1|g+176.6|g)=0.76 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.50 {I3} 
RI$Other: 0.550 {I55} (1969La11); 0.49 {I11} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.160 {I16} (1969La11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=2.6 {I3} 
RI$Other: 4.30 {I43} undivided I|g (1969La11); 4.10 {I22} estimated I|g (2020Kr05). 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.49 {I20}:0.060 {I42} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$Not observed in 2016Ma35. 
RI$Other: 0.57 {I9} (1969La11) 
M$Ice(K)<0.12 (1969La11); reported as E1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=4.3 {I3} 
RI$Other: 4.6 {I5} (1969La11); 4.91 {I20} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.140 {I28} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.11 {I17} 
RI$Other: 1.20 {I12} (1969La11) 
M$Ice(L1):Ice(M)=2.50 {I75}:2.30 {I35} (1969La11) 
M,MR$ce(L1) peak is complex and assigned M1 in 1969La11. Statistical-model calculations also suggest pure M1 (|d=0) transition based on level intensity balance in 2016Ma35. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.55 {I6} 
E$Complex |g line in 1969La11 
RI$Other: 0.57 {I6} undivided I|g (1969La11); 0.56 {I12} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L12)=0.20 {I3}:0.11 {I3} (1969La11); mult=M1+E2 for doublet; reported as M1 in 1969La11. 
MR$Average of deduced upper and lower limits. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.52 {I9} 
RI$Other: 1.65 {I17} (1969La11); 1.41 {I9} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.170 {I26} (1969La11); reported as M1 in 1969La11. 
MR$Average of deduced upper and lower limits. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.075 {I4} 
E$Tentative transition in 1969La11. 
RI$Other: 4.30 {I43} undivided I|g (1969La11); 0.455 {I24} estimated I|g (2020Kr05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.57 {I10} 
RI$Other: 0.68 {I14} (1969La11); 0.65 {I12} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.55 {I11} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.91 {I11} 
RI$Other: 0.640 {I64} (1969La11). 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=1.40 {I98}:0.130 {I65} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.1 {I4} 
RI$Other: 0.87 {I13} (1969La11) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=1.34 {I33}:0.20 {I6} (1969La11). Reported as complex line in 1969La11; Ice data deduced by evaluator according to I|g(111.8|g) fraction of the I|g(111.7|g+111.8|g)=2.47 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.068 {I21} 
RI$Other: 0.110 {I22} (1969La11); 0.14 {I5} estimated I|g after background subtraction for {+188}Re line intensity (2020Kr05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.48 {I12} 
RI$Other: 0.780 {I78} (1969La11); 1.05 {I11} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L12)=0.37 {I6}:0.089 {I31} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.142 {I8} 
E,RI$Multiply-placed |g; I|g estimated from statistical-model analysis (2016Ma35); see 691-keV level. 
E$Placement of |g from 463 level is uncertain (1969La11,1973Gl06). 
RI$Other: 0.090 {I18} undivided I|g (1969La11); < 0.06 (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.285 {I23} 
E,RI$Reported as newly placed transition in 2020Kr05, however, |g is also reported in previous (n,|g) measurements. 
RI$Other: 0.450 {I45} (1969La11); 0.42 {I9} (2020Kr05). 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L12)=0.48 {I17}:0.094 {I33} (1969La11); reported as M1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=1.03 {I3} 
RI$Other: 1.18 {I12} (1969La11); divided I|g according to I|g(147.4|g; 469.8) fraction of the I|g(147.4|g; 469.8+147.4; 736.1)=1.11 doublet deduced by evaluator using the I|g data from 2016Ma35 and applying the fraction to the undivided I|g=1.40 {I14} reported in 1969La11. 
RI$Other: 1.44 {I16} estimated I|g (2020Kr05). 
M$Ice(K)=1.09 {I11} (1969La11); deduced by evaluator assuming 0.84 {I2} fraction of total Ice(K)=1.30 {I13} (1969La11); Ice(L1) obscured by Ice(M) (137.2 transition). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.141 {I11} 
RI$Other: 0.17 {I3} (1969La11); 0.16 {I4} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.063 (I13) (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.59 {I13} 
RI$Other: 0.590 {I59} (1969La11); 0.59 {I13} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=1.80 {I63}:0.48 {I17} (1969La11); reported as M1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.8 {I4} 
RI$Other: 0.81 {I12} (1969La11); 0.77 {I11} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.490 {I98} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.95 {I6} 
RI$Other: 0.97 {I15} (1969La11); 0.93 {I16} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.120 {I18}:0.059 {I41} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.38 {I5} 
RI$Other: 0.380 {I57} (1969La11); 0.26 {I7} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.80 {I24} (1969La11); Ice(L1) obscured by Ice(N) from 111.7 and 111.8 transitions. Typographical error: Ice(N) (111.3 transition) contamination listed in column 20 of Table 3 in 1969La11 does not have a corresponding transition listed in columns 10 and 11. Reported as M1 in 1969La11. 
MR$Average of deduced upper and lower limits. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.18 {I4} 
E,RI$Reported as newly placed transition in 2020Kr05, however, |g is also reported in previous (n,|g) measurements. 
RI$Other: 0.57 {I6} undivided I|g (1969La11); 0.25 {I8} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L12)=0.20 {I3}:0.110 {I33} (1969La11); mult=M1+E2 for doubly-placed |g; reported as M1 in 1969La11. 
MR$Average of deduced upper and lower limits. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.37 {I6} 
RI$Other: 0.320 {I32} (1969La11); 0.25 {I7} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.230 {I81} (1969La11); reported as E2+M1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.62 {I21} 
E,RI$Absent in 1969La11 and reported without intensity in 1973Gl06. 
RI$Other: 0.32 {I9} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.59 {I4} 
RI$Other: 0.56 {I6} (1969La11); 0.51 {I7} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)<0.04 (1969La11); reported as E1,(E2) in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=3.27 {I6} 
RI$Other: 3.3 {I3} (1969La11); 3.0 {I3} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)<0.06 (1969La11); reported as E1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Current level J|p assignment consistent with M3 |g; proposed (2,3)- assignment in 2020Kr05 supports [M1,E2] although intensity of |g is very weak and has 60% uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.37 {I9} 
RI$Other: 0.34 {I5} (1969La11); 0.37 {I10} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.18 {I3}:0.054 {I18} (1969La11). Reported as complex line with mult=M1 in 1969La11; Ice data deduced by evaluator according to I|g(176.6|g) fraction of the I|g(176.1|g+176.6|g)=0.76 doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement of |g from 646 level is uncertain (1969La11,1973Gl06); |g not observed in 2016Ma35. 
RI$Other: 0.110 {I22} (1969La11); undivided I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.10 {I3} 
RI$Other: 0.250 {I38} (1969La11) 
M$Ice(L1)=0.66 {I17} (1969La11); reported as M1+(E2) in 1969La11. 
MR$Average of deduced upper and lower limits. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.13 {I3} 
RI$Other: 0.38 {I6} (1969La11); 0.43 {I10} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.23 {I6} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.70 {I5} 
RI$Other: 0.78 {I8} (1969La11); 0.68 {I8} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L12)=0.140 {I14}:0.038 {I13} (1969La11); reported as M1 in 1969La11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Multiply-paced |g with unresolved I|g; not observed in 2016Ma35; see 463-keV level. 
RI$Other: 0.090 {I18} (1969La11); undivided I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.087 {I9} 
RI$Other: 0.110 {I22} (1969La11) undivided I|g; 0.028 {I16} estimated I|g (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.200 {I22} 
RI$Other: 0.22 {I4} (1969La11); divided I|g according to I|g(147.4|g; 736.1) fraction of the I|g(147.4|g; 469.8+147.4; 736.1)=1.11 doublet deduced by evaluator using the I|g data from 2016Ma35 and applying the fraction to the undivided I|g=1.40 {I14} reported in 1969La11. 
RI$Other: 0.125 {I14} estimated I|g (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K)=0.21 {I3} (1969La11); deduced by evaluator assuming 0.16 {I2} fraction of total Ice(K)=1.30 {I13} (1969La11); Ice(L1) obscured by Ice(M) (137.2 transition). 
Placement of |g from 736 level is uncertain (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.158 {I16} 
E$Other: 438.6233 {I6} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.23 {I5} (1969La11); 0.12 {I4} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.15 {I5} 
E$Other: 550.7978 {I9} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.22 {I4} (1969La11); 0.19 {I7} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.197 {I19} 
E$Other: 407.0697 {I9} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.24 {I5} (1969La11); 0.06 {I3} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.23 {I11} 
E$Other: 417.8704 {I5} in 2020Kr05. 
RI$Other: 0.26 {I5} (1969La11); 0.21 {I6} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.63 {I4} 
E$479.3 {I3} for complex |g (1969La11). Other: 479.5829 {I9} (2020Kr05). 
RI$Other: 0.7 {I3} (1969La11); 0.12 {I5} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.16 {I8} 
E$Other: 585.4965 {I13} in 2020Kr05. 
RI$Other: 0.18 {I5} (1969La11); 0.048 {I24} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.37 {I2} 
E$Other: 496.6007 {I5} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.47 {I9} (1969La11); 0.24 {I6} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.24 {I9} 
E$Other: 608.1735 {I12} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.31 {I9} (1969La11); 0.064 {I26} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.11 {I4} 
E$Other: 644.9220 {I8} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.14 {I4} (1969La11); 0.038 {I14} estimated I|g (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.13 {I5} 
E$Other: 163.3688 {I3} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.11 {I3} (1969La11); 0.12 {I5} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.237 {I18} 
E$Other: 219.7526 {I3} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.19 {I3} (1969La11); 0.23 {I8} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.52 {I6} 
E$Other: 140.09188 {I11} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.640 {I96} (1969La11); 0.57 {I10} (2020Kr05) 
M$Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.320 {I64}:0.130 {I52} (1969La11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.073 {I21} 
E$Other: 237.5479 {I3} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.090 {I18} (1969La11); 0.047 {I14} estimated I|g (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.22 {I5} 
E$Other: 355.7016 {I4} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.27 {I4} (1969La11); 0.32 {I8} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.022 {I4} 
E$Other: 196.8368 {I6} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.03 (1969La11); 0.027 {I25} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=0.118 {I11} 
E$Other: 286.4538 {I5} (2020Kr05) 
RI$Other: 0.22 {I3} (1969La11); 0.18 {I9} (2020Kr05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$this |g would require M2 multipolarity which is not expected to compete strongly with M1+E2 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$the branching intensity for this transition appears to be too large with respect to the apparent transition probability B(E2)(W.u.)=1.3|*10{+5} for this |g derived from the adopted branchings and B(E2)(844)=0.080. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E1)
decay_comment:
M$From the intensity balance at the 1474 keV level and intensity ratio of 155|g and 207|g assuming multipolarities for 368|g M1 and 635|g E2 in {+187}Re({+82}Se,{+82}Se'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From the intensity balance at the 1474 keV level and intensity ratio of 155|g and 207|g assuming multipolarities for 368|g M1 and 635|g E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$The Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LWM) of 31.09 {I12} and 30.71 {I10} (1999Mb04) and also 32.43 {I15} (1976Br09). Weighted average 31.16 {I7}. 
MR$Weighted average of +0.175 {I6} (Coul Ex.) and +0.160 {I6} (1973Kr05). 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=1752 {I35}:268 {I5}:34.1 {I7}:10:66 {I7}:16 {I2}:5 {I2}, |a(K)exp=1.84 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.27 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.075 {I15}. Weighted average of values from 1960Ga11, 1962Bi08, 1964No08, 1964Se11, 1966As02, 1966Wi17, 1970He14, 1971Br45, and 1979Ya14. 20% uncertainty assumed when not given by authors. Other measurements: 1953Co11, 1957Be56, 1957Du49, 1957Mc34, 1958Ve35, 1959Kl90, 1962St21, 1963Ha26, and 1966As02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N23:O1=100:42 {I2}:47 {I3}:25 {I4}:12 {I2}:15 {I1}:3.5 {I9}: 2.0 {I7}:8.7 {I9}:4.5 {I9}:2.7 {I9}, |a(K)exp=0.722 {I21}, |a(L1)exp=0.080 {I16}, |a(L2)exp=0.032 {I6}, |a(L3)exp=0.033 {I5}. Weighted average of measurements from 1960Ga11, 1962Bi08, 1962St21, 1963Ha26, 1964Se11, 1965Ba25, 1965Bi07, 1966Wi17, 1970He14, 1971Br45, and 1979Ya14. 20% uncertainty has been assumed when not explicitly given. 
CC from 1993Zh27. |a(K)exp=0.765 {I9} (1993Zh27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
RI$using limitation of weighted average (LWM) of 0.52 {I1} (1976Br09) and 0.419 {I8} (1999Mb04). 
M$|a(K)exp=2.47 {I6} (1979Ya14); |a(K)exp=1.94 {I11} and |a(L)exp=0.462 {I24} (1993Mi29). Other: 17 {I5} (1971Br45). K:L1:L23:M:N=2.0 {I2}:0.48 {I18}:<0.06:0.27 {I5}:0.06 {I3} from 1966Wi17, 1962Bi08. 
MR |<0.1 (1993Mi29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Using Limitation of weighted average of 2.364 {I25} (1976Br09) and 2.460 {I15} (1999Mb04). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I2}, weighted average of values from 1966Wi17, 1970He14, and 1971Br45. K:L=3.6 from 1962Bi08. Other measurement: 1979Ya14. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI From calculated I(|g+ce)=0.4. 
E$this transition was inferred from ce|g coincidence data of 1965Bi07. The total intensity was reported equal to the 582 transition intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this transition was previously unplaced. 1965Bi07 reported a 448-keV transition deexciting the 582 level which was poorly resolved in ce|g (NaI) coincidence. No 448|g transition has been observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.108 {I7} (1976Br09) and 0.113 {I10} (1999Mb04). 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.015 from 1971Br45 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.446 {I9} (1976Br09) and 0.456 {I7} (1999Mb04). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.03 {I8} (1979Ya14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1966Wi17 and adopted |a value. Other values: 0.066 {I4} (1983Si18), <0.08 (1976Br09); I(|g+ce)=0.2% (1965Bi07) corresponds to I|g=0.03. The adopted I|g is consistent with the intensity balance through lower levels. This transition was placed deexciting the 625 level by 1976Br09 and 1979Ya14 but it is too intense to feed the 589 level. The placement is consistent with the ce|g coincidence arguments of 1965Bi07 and confirmed by 1986Ha21. 
M$L1:L2:L3:M=100:19 {I3}:18 {I2}:32 {I2}, |a(L1)exp=12.1 {I3}. Weighted average of values from 1962Bi08, 1965Bi07, and 1966Wi17. Other measurement: 1971Br45. Other measurement: 1971Br45. 
MR Deduced by the evaluator from |a(L1)exp=12.1 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:N=0.70 {I7}:0.16 {I2}:<0.03:<0.03:<0.04, from 1966Wi17. |a(K)exp=2.3 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.47 {I12} from 1965Bi07, 1971Br45. Other measurement: 1962Bi08. 
MR Deduced by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=2.3 {I4}. |a(L)exp=0.47 {I12} gives 0.27 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0282 {I8}, weighted average of 0.0290 {I9} (1993Mi29), 0.0257 {I21} (1979Ya14), 0.027 {I3} (1971Br45), and 0.026 {I3} (1970He14). Other: 2.6 (1965Bi07). |a(L)exp=0.0039 {I16} (1979Ya14) and 0.00424 {I21} (1993Mi29). 
MR 0.37 {I6} (1993Mi29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$deduced using I(|g+ce)(7|g)/I(|g+ce)(625|g)=1.87 {I24} (1970He14) and |a=660 {I20}. Other: I|g=0.014 {I7} (1983Si18). 
M M1:M2:M3=100:<20:<5 from 1966Wi17. 
MR from 1966Wi17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:M1:N1=1.3 {I1}:0.35 {I4}:<0.04:0.07 {I2}:<0.04 from 1966Wi17. |a(K)exp=2.4 {I3}, weighted average of 1965Bi07 and 1971Br45. Other measurement: 1962Bi08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0108 {I7}, weighted average of values from 0.0109 {I8} (1993Mi29), 0.011 {I11} (1979Ya14), 0.009 {I3} (1971Br45), and 0.011 {I2} (1970He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$this transition was reported by 1986Ha21 with I|g=0.76 {I3}. This intensity is too large to be consistent with the decay scheme. Presumably either a misprint or an unrecognized impurity is present. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M=5.9 {I2}:0.85 {I8}:0.43 {I6}:0.27 {I4}:0.35 {I2} from 1966Wi17. |a(K)exp=0.0177 {I9}, weighted average of values from 1970He14, 1971Br45, and 1979Ya14. Other measurements: 1953Co11, 1957Du49, 1958Ve35, 1960Ga11, 1962Bi08, and 1963Ha26. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I2}, from weighted average of 0.00484 {I21} (1993Mi29), 0.0054 {I6} (1979Ya14), 0.0048 {I6} (1970He14), and 0.0040 {I1} (1971Br45). 
MR |<0.019 (1993Mi29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0034 {I2}, weighted average of 0.0034 {I2} (1993Mi29), 0.0032 {I4} (1979Ya14), 0.0036 {I7} (1971Br45), 0.0033 {I3} (1970He14), and 0.0038 {I8} (1966Wi17). Other measurements: 1953Co11, 1958Ve35, 1962Bi08, 1963Ha26, and 1965Ba25. 
MR |<0.08 (1993Mi29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0166 {I5}, weighted average of 0.0167 {I5} (1993Mi29), 0.0155 {I19} (1979Ya14), 0.018 {I4} (1971Br45), and 0.015 {I3} (1970He14). K:L:M=1.2 {I6}:0.20 {I3}:0.05 {I1} from 1966Wi17. Other measurements: 1958Ve35, 1962Bi08, and 1963Ha26. 
MR from 1979Ya14. Other: |<0.32 (1993Mi29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$value is consistent with no |b feeding to this level but inconsistent with B(E2) to this level in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.32 {I1} (1976Br09) and 0.0290 {I8} (1999Mb04). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.31 {I2} from weighted average of values in 1965Bi07, 1970He14, 1971Br45, and 1979Ya14. K:L1=0.31 {I2}:0.08 {I3} from 1966Wi17. Other measurement: 1962Bi08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$using limitation of weighted average (LWM) of 0.44 {I1} (1976Br09) and 0.379 {I8} (1999Mb04). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.28 {I3}, weighted average of values in 1965Bi07, 1970He14, 1971Br45, and 1979Ya14. K:L1=0.24 {I4}:0.08 {I3} from 1966Wi17. Other measurement: 1962Bi08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.15 {I3} from weighted average of values in 1966Wi17, 1970He14, 1971Br45, and 1979Ya14. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.109 {I13} (1976Br09) and 1.112 {I7} (1999Mb04). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I6} from 1970He14. Other: 0.021 {I15} from 1979Ya14. 
MR Deduced by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.020 {I6} (1970He14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.519 {I6} (1976Br09) and 0.512 {I4} (1999Mb04). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I3} from weighted average of values in 1966Wi17, 1970He14, and 1971Br45. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average branching intensity from I|g(301)/I|g(168)=0.17 {I5} (1958Mc02), 0.19 {I5} (1956Da40), and 0.22 {I5} (1956Go47). Other values: 0.25 (1957Wo32) and 0.18 (1959De29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 92.447 keV {I6} (1963Sc05) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
RI$From {+188}Re IT decay. 
M$From K:L12:M=10.3:2.4:1.0 and corresponding conversion electron coefficients (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
MR$From subshell ratios and |a(K)exp=5.9 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.9 {I2} (1964Ta07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From K:L12:M=13.1:2.2:0.9 and corresponding conversion electron coefficients (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
MR$From subshell ratios and |a(K)exp=3.8 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.7 {I2} (1964Ta07). 
E$Other: 105.960 keV {I8} (1963Sc05) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M3)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy differences. 
RI$From intensity balance in {+188}Re IT decay. 
M$from ce(N) observed by 1964Ta07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
E$From the observed M-shell conversion electron line in 1964Ta07 
M$from the observed ce(L3) (ce(L1) and ce(L2) were not detected) and ce(M1)/ce(M3)|?0.2 (ce(M2), ce(M4) and ce(M5) were not detected) in 1964Ta07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LE
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$From K/L12=5.5 {I8} and |a(K)exp=1.65 {I60} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 56.59 {I23} from {+188}W |b{+-} decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I4}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.068 {I15} 
MR$ |< 0.4 from K/L12=6.2 {I13} and |a(K)=0.42 {I4} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.189 {I14}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.026 {I3} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
MR$from K/(L1+L2)=7.3 {I10} and |a(K)exp=0.189 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.97 {I18} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
MR$0.9 {I4} from |a(K)exp=0.97 {I18} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th., but the value is inconsistent with a 1+ to 0+ transition, which should be a pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.43 {I7}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.088 {I16} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 
MR$from K/(L1+L2)=4.9 {I6} (1968Su01) in {+187}Re(n,|g) E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.55 {I2} (1972Sh13) and 0.5661 {I23} (2002Po17) 
M$(227|g)(64|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} 
MR$ |< 0.4 from K/L12=6.2 {I13} and |a(K)=0.42 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 63.7 {I1} (1962Ha46), 63.58 (1968Ma14), and 63.581 {I3} (1963Sc05) 
RI$From intensity balance. Others: 21.4 {I22} (1968Ma14), 13 {I6} (1963Sc05); I|g(63.6|g)/I|g(92.4|g)=4.0 (1972De67) 
M$|a(L)exp=2.7 {I5} using L| x ray fluorescence yield of 0.3 in 1964Ta07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 92.45 (1968Ma14), 92.8 {I6} (1964Bu10), and 92.447 {I6} (1963Sc05) 
RI$From I|g(105.8530|g)=100.0 {I18} and I|g(92.464|g)/I|g(105.8530|g)= 0.451 {I16}, weighted average from the measured intensities of I|g(105.8530|g)=200 {I10} (1968Ma14), 200 {I20} (1964Ta07) and 226 {I5} (1963Sc05), and I|g(92.464|g)=100 {I5} (1968Ma14), 100 {I6} (1964Ta07) and 100 {I5} (1963Sc05) 
M$|a(K)exp=5.9 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.9 {I2} (1964Ta07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Other: 156.03 (1968Ma14) 
RI$From I|g(92.464|g)=45.1 {I18} and the Adopted gammas branching ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From Adopted gammas 
E$Other: 105.9 {I3} (1964Bu10), 105.96 (1968Ma14), 105.960 {I8} (1963Sc05) 
M$|a(K)exp=3.8 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.7 {I2} (1964Ta07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$From the observed M-shell conversion electron line in 1964Ta07 
M$from observed ce(L3). ce(L1) and ce(L2) not detected. M1/M3|?0.2. Other M-conversion lines not found. Hence, M3 assignment (1964Ta07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 63.581 keV {I3} (1963Sc05). 
M$From L1:L2:L3:M:N=35.5:4.1:1.1:9.5:2.8 and corresponding conversion electron coefficients (1968Su01) 
MR$From subshell ratios and |a(L)exp=2.7 {I5} (1964Ta07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 92.47 {I20} from |g|g coin data in 2016Be02, 92.447 keV {I6} (1963Sc05). 
RI$Other: 0.84 {I9} from |g|g coin data in 2016Be02 
M$From K:L12:M=10.3:2.4:1.0 and corresponding conversion electron coefficients (1968Su01) 
MR$From subshell ratios and |a(K)exp=5.9 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.9 {I2} (1964Ta07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From K:L12:M=13.1:2.2:0.9 and corresponding conversion electron coefficients (1968Su01) 
MR$From subshell ratios and |a(K)exp=3.8 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.7 {I2} (1964Ta07). 
E$Others: 105.862 {I3} in 1972Sh13 and 105.960 {I8} (1963Sc05). 
RI$Other: 2.04 {I17} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 141.757 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 1.21 {I11} in 1972Sh13 
M$From K/L12=5.5 {I8} and |a(K)exp=1.65 {I60} (1968Su01) 
MR$From |a(K)exp and K/L12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other: 207.849 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 4.8 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.026 {I11} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 74.86 {I8} (2016Be02) 
RI$Other: 2.11 {I3} using branching ratios in 2016Be02 and I|g(167.3258|g)=2.34 {I3}. 
M$|a(L1)exp=0.12 {I11} (1968Su01), but value overlaps also with Mult=E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Assigned in 1972Sh13 to depopulate also the level at 372 keV, but the assignment was not confirmed in 2010Ba48 and 2016Be02. Other: 87.43 {I10} in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.076 {I21} from |g|g coin. data in 2016Be02 
M$|a(K)exp=10.5 {I35}, |a(L1)exp=3.2 {I14} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 193.346 {I10} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.81 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.56 {I26} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 256.924 {I1} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 1.05 {I11} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.16 {I3} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Assigned in 1972Sh13 to depopulate also the level at 470 keV, but the assignment was not confirmed in 2010Ba48 and 2016Be02. Other: 117.74 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.025 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Other: 131.079 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.45 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(L1)exp=0.41 {I21} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 227.082 {I7} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 2.42 in 1972Sh13 (used for normalization) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I4}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.068 {I15} 
MR$ |< 0.4 from K/L12=6.2 {I13} and |a(K)=0.42 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 290.669 {I13} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 5.2 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.189 {I14}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.026 {I3} (1968Su01) 
MR$from K/(L1+L2)=7.3 {I10} and |a(K)exp=0.189 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$Others: 236.6219 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 236.647 {I8} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 2.29 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 1.86 {I15} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.073 {I19} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 300.201 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 300.210 {I11} in 1972Sh1 
RI$Others: 1.07 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 1.05 {I5} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 111.590 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.48 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp(111.59|g+111.68|g)=3.3 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 156.421 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.54 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=1.13 {I15} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 157.194 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.33 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.7 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 111.681 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.44 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp(111.59|g+111.68|g)=3.3 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Other: 145.721 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.52 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.97 {I18} (1968Su01) 
MR$0.9 {I4} from |a(K)exp=0.97 {I18} (1968Su01), but the value is inconsistent with a 1+ to 0+ transition, which should be a pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 299.125 {I30} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.161 {I11} in 1972Sh13 and 0.117 {I11} in |g|g coin in 2016Be02 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.33 {I17} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 362.712 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 362.66 {I20} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.513 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.76 {I8} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.07 {I3} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Assigned in 1972Sh13 to depopulate also the level at 285 keV, but the assignment was not confirmed in 2010Ba48 and 2016Be02. Other: 115.156 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.30 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=2.2 {I8} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 372.128 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 372.15 {I20} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.110 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.11 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 208.844 {I8} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 1.05 {I8} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.39 {I5} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Assigned in 1972Sh13 to depopulate also the level at 430 keV, but the assignment was not confirmed in 2010Ba48 and 2016Be02. Other: 145.155 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.30 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$ |a(K)exp=0.97 {I18} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 107.425 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.290 {I23} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$ |a(K)exp=3.5 {I9} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 406.560 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 406.51 {I7} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.126 {I16} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.30 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 128.56 {I4} in 1972Sh13. Placed to depopulate the 284.598 keV level in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.113 {I11} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 251.239 {I8} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 1.19 {I12} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.22 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 274.322 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 274.317 {I11} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 1.22 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 1.05 {I10} in 1972Sh13 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.19 {I3} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$Complex line. Others: E|g=140.965 {I5} and I|g=0.161 {I24} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=1.9 {I8} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 151.116 keV {I4} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 151.12 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.103 {I10} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 0.089 {I18} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 199.512 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 1.09 {I9} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.43 {I4} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 190.374 {I7} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.18 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=1.0 {I5} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 266.126 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 266.85 {I10} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.090 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.066 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 353.67 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 
RI$Other: 0.032 {I7} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 114.5615 keV {I14} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 114.563 {I5} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.113 {I11} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$ |a(K)exp=1.5 {I7} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 241.30 {I7} in 1972Sh13. Placed to depopulate the 541.8-keV level in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.044 {I9} in 1972Sh13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 93.577 {I3} in 1972Sh13. 
RI$Other: 0.234 {I23} in 1972Sh13. 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=3.8 {I16} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 344.77 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 344.74 {I23} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.032 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 0.048 {I15} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 219.449 {I8} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.694 {I14} in 1972Sh13 
M$|a(K)exp=0.43 {I7}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.088 {I16} (1968Su01) 
MR$from K/(L1+L2)=4.9 {I6} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 374.24 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 374.30 {I20} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.078 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.09 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 376.83 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 376.80 {I20} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.049 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.089 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 518.57 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 518.6 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.142 {I25} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.20 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 581.77 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.122 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$Other: 138.725 {I5} in 1972Sh13, placed at 346.6-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.20 {I3} in 1972Sh13 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=1.5 {I10} (1968Su01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 236.6219 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 2.29 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 318.311 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 318.37 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.225 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.186 {I15} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 266.126 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 266.18 {I2} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.090 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.089 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 338.189 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 338.22 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.235 {I23} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.40 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 565.45 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 565.8 {I7} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.227 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.19 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 178.852 {I5} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 178.839 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but placed with the 541.553-keV level 
RI$From branching ratio in 2016Be02 and I|g(268.85|g)=0.014 {I7}. Other: 0.103 {I7} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02) and 0.105 {I16} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 437.15 {I3} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 437.72 {I26} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.036 {I9} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.23 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 583.78 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.063 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 161.074 {I8}, placed with the 448.2-keV level in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.081 {I8} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 293.74 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 293.82 {I12} in 1972Sh1 
RI$Others: 0.056 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.077 {I12} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 102.5 {I3} in |g|g coin in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: <0.013 from branching ratios in 2016Be02 and I|g(217.07|g)=0.19 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 317.370 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 317.35 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.090 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.089 {I18} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 474.740 {I17} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 474.75 {I28} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.143 {I16} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.22 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 523.99 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 524.05 {I58} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.071 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.09 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 262.761 {I13} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.097 {I15} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 376.83 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 376.80 {I20} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.049 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.089 {I13} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 488.73 {I4} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 487.21 {I45} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.040 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 0.024 {I9} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 114.5615 keV {I14} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 114.563 {I5} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.113 {I6} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02) 0.113 {I11} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 406.560 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.126 {I16} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 432.438 {I25} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 432.29 {I22} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.052 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.11 {I3} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 123.270 {I33} in 1972Sh13, but placed to depopulate the 680-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.014 {I3} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 444.20 {I27} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.11 {I3} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 529.37 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 529.21 {I58} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.040 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.40 {I12} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 374.24 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 374.30 {I20} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to depopulate the 582-keV level 
RI$Others: 0.078 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.09 {I3} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to depopulate the 582-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 411.31 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.014 {I8} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 449.67 {I3} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 449.80 {I27} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$From branching ratio in 2016Be02, relative to I|g(554.26|g)=0.329 {I18}. Others: 0.164 {I13} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.27 {I7} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 479.90 {I30} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.040 {I16} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 554.255 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 554.43 {I40} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.38 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.22 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 222.96 {I7} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to depopulate the 575-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.025 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to depopulate the 575-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 399.99 {I20} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.044 {I13} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 413.931 {I22} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 413.88 {I22} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.053 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.12 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 557.35 {I40} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to depopulate the 556-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.14 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to depopulate the 556-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 575.30 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.061 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 542.87 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 542.97 {I40} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.082 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.97 {I29} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 238.369 {I15} in 1972Sh13, but placed to depopulate the 523-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.157 {I24} in 1972Sh13, but placed to depopulate the 523-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 196.36 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but placed to depopulate the 352-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.085 {I13} in 1972Sh13, but placed to depopulate the 352-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 437.717 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 437.72 {I26} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.148 {I15} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.23 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 571.59 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.057 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 274.322 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 275.510 {I9} in 1972Sh1 
RI$Others: 1.22 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.73 {I7} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 394.08 {I30} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.053 {I16} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 456.34 {I8} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 456.46 {I28} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.056 {I9} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.14 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 525.74 {I7} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 525.69 {I58} in 1972Sh13, but the line is in question 
RI$Others: 0.066 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.56 {I17} in 1972Sh13, but the line is in question 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 140.9651 keV {I18} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 141.24 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but it is associated with the 347-keV level 
RI$From branching ratios in 2016Be02 using I|g(173.008|g)=0.110 {I8}; Other: 0.065 {I10} in 1972Sh13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 474.740 {I17} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.143 {I16} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 500.75 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 500.74 {I38} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.110 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.11 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 586.16 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 586.7 {I7} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.145 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.12 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 287.86 {I12} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.105 {I16} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 300.201 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 300.210 {I11} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 1.07 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 1.05 {I5} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 191.58 {I5} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.015 {I5} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 330.35 {I22} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.052 {I10} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 428.77 {I22} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.13 {I3} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 437.717 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 437.72 {I26} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.148 {I15} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.23 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 454.048 {I18} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 454.15 {I28} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.117 {I16} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.14 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 599.93 {I74} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.15 {I5} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 602.302 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 602.57 {I74} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.185 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.32 {I10} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 317.370 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 
RI$From branching ratios in 2016Be02 and I|g(579.543|g)=0.201 {I18}. Other: 0.090 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 328.38 {I22} in 1972Sh13, assigned to the 630-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.052 {I10} in 1972Sh13, assigned to the 630-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 449.67 {I3} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 449.80 {I27} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.164 {I13} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.27 {I7} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 450.272 {I17} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.092 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 318.311 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 318.366 {I40} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.255 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.186 {I15} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 142.71 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to the 429.8-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.012 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 565.45 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 565.80 {I65} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.227 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.19 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 822.38 {I7} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.140 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 626.38 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 626.55 {I50} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.34 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.52 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 832.47 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.052 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 293.74 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 293.82 {I12} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.056 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.077 {I12} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 389.46 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to the 680-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.18 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 525.74 {I7} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.066 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 646.53 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 646.64 {I60} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.070 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.18 {I5} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 669.08 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.108 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 341.57 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 341.653 {I22} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.050 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.137 {I21} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 178.852 keV {I5} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02). 
RI$Other: 0.103 {I7} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 542.05 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 542.97 {I40} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.047 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.97 {I29} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 568.48 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.067 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 602.302 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 602.57 {I74} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.185 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.32 {I10} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 676.36 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 676.21 {I90} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.127 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.12 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 702.75 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.064 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 795.04 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 794.9 {I8} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.373 {I25} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.43 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 611.64 {I23} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.070 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 662.86 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 662.9 {I6} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.281 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.37 {I11} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 401.06 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 
RI$Other: 0.032 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 498.94 {I4} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 499.30 {I38} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.130 {I20} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.16 {I5} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 714.84 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 714.8 {I7} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.237 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.35 {I10} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 297.93 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 297.83 {I18} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.030 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.021 {I7} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 362.712 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 362.66 {I20} in 1972Sh13, associated with the 363-keV level 
RI$Others: 0.513 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.76 {I8} in 1972Sh13, associated with the 363-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 626.38 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 626.55 {I50} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.34 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.52 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 883.08 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.100 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 701.85 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 701.4 {I10} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.274 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.34 {I10} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 714.84 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 714.78 {I70} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.237 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.35 {I11} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 659.69 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.056 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 413.931 {I22} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.053 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 456.34 {I8} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 455.46 {I40} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.056 {I9} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.14 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 341.57 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 
RI$Other: 0.050 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 716.71 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.073 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 338.189 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 338.22 {I4} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Other: 0.235 {I23} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.40 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 744.29 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 744.2 {I8} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.191 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.27 {I8} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 167.898 {I8} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 167.910 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$From branching ratios in 2016Be02 and I|g(599.14|g)=0.039 {I10}. Others: 0.064 {I8} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 0.53 {I8} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 178.852 {I5} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02). 
RI$Other: 0.103 {I7} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 666.39 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.135 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 753.70 {I14} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.080 {I19} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 768.19 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.045 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 860.38 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.049 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 167.898 {I8} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 167.910 {I4} in 1972Sh13 
RI$From branching ratios in 2016Be02 and I|g(348.64|g)=0.022 {I6}. Others: 0.064 {I8} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 0.53 {I8} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 348.79 {I25} in 1972Sh13, but assigned to the 557-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.048 {I15} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 442.36 {I6} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.037 {I9} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 316.452 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 
RI$Other: 0.032 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 463.41 {I22} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 463.64 {I42} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.020 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.056 {I17} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 741.56 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.032 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 701.85 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.274 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 560.37 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.052 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 762.73 {I18} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.066 {I17} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 879.73 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.091 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 945.38 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.078 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 492.933 {I19} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 433.05 {I30} in 1972Sh13, but associated with the 557-keV level 
RI$Others: 0.118 {I14} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.15 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 151.116 {I4} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02); 152.7 {I3} in |g|g coin (2016Be02) 
RI$ Other: 0.103 {I10} in |g-ray singles (2016Be02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 401.06 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 401.21 {I30} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.032 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.065 {I19} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 494.70 {I4} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.044 {I9} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 696.11 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.097 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 799.77 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.093 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 812.94 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.064 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 826.70 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.115 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 492.933 {I19} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 493.05 {I30} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.118 {I14} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.15 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 683.80 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 684.2 {I9} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.158 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.25 {I8} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 297.93 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 297.83 {I18} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.030 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02, 0.031 {I7} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 425.67 {I4} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.124 {I16} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 718.78 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.083 {I25} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 488.73 {I4} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.040 {I10} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 724.02 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 725.7 {I11} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.082 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.14 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 854.93 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.063 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 842.98 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.071 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 117.1 {I4} from |g|g coin in 2016Be02 
RI$From 1972Sh13. Other: <0.013 from branching ratios in 2016Be02 and I|g(573.90|g)=0.043 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 437.717 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 437.72 {I26} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.148 {I15} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.23 {I6} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 450.272 {I17} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 449.80 {I27} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.092 {I12} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.27 {I7} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 586.16 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 586.7 {I7} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.145 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.12 {I4} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 379.31 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 379.15 {I20} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 
RI$Others: 0.012 {I7} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.056 {I23} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 662.86 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.281 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 710.00 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 709.6 {I10} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.141 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.17 {I5} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 856.18 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.082 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1049.8 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.061 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1062.19 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.11 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 845.02 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.085 {I20} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 926.07 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.075 {I23} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1019.8 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.057 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 589.99 {I6} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.045 {I10} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 746.59 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.045 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 297.93 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 297.83 {I18} in 1972Sh1 
RI$Others: 0.030 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.031 {I7} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 623.34 {I5} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.066 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 927.69 {I19} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.08 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 867.10 {I9} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.140 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 938.40 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.118 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 437.15 {I3} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 437.72 {I26} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.036 {I9} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.23 {I6} in 1972Sh13, but the line is complex 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1119.2 {I8} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.025 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 542.87 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.082 {I12} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 950.7 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.060 {I22} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1059.9 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.050 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 837.10 {I25} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.037 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 247.15 {I8} in 1972Sh13, but associated with the 430-keV level 
RI$Other: 0.065 {I13} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 792.39 {I18} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.042 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 498.94 {I4} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 499.30 {I38} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Other: 0.130 {I20} from |g-ray singles in 2016Be02; 0.16 {I5} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 784.23 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.050 {I16} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 990.3 {I7} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.017 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1100.9 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.045 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 917.04 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.109 {I24} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1143.1 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.059 {I13} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1042.2 {I4} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.07 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 780.3 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.020 {I14} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 956.84 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.079 {I23} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 523.99 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 524.05 {I58} in 1972Sh13 
RI$Others: 0.071 {I11} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02; 0.09 {I3} in 1972Sh13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1055.60 {I17} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.14 {I3} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1013.67 {I21} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 
RI$Other: 0.070 {I15} in |g-ray singles of 2016Be02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Re IT decay 
M,MR$from |a(exp)=3.0 {I4} deduced from intensity balance in {+190}Re IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$no isomeric transitions from the decay of this isomer have been reported in the literature. Transition to the 119, (3)- level is suggested by evaluators. If this transition has 100% I(|g+ce) branching, then B(M3)(W.u.)=0.000102 {I+12-11}. E4 transition to the g.s., (2)- is also possible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a=3.0 {I4} deduced by the evaluators from |g+ce balance of 119|g at 119 level, which is fed by the IT decay of the 3.1-h isomer and de-excites via the 119|g to the 3.0-min g.s. assuming I(|g+ce)(absolute)(119|g)=100, with |b{+-} decays of the 3.0-min g.s. and the 3.1-h isomer in equilibrium. The feedings to 119 level from the 3.1-h isomer are obtained from and equal to the sum of net |g+ce intensities from 2352, 1996 and 1387 levels in {+190}Os, which are the only levels fed directly by the |b{+-} decay of the 3.0-min g.s. but not directly fed by the |b{+-} decay of the 3.1-h isomer, as claimed by 1974Ya02. See {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) for more details on the feedings. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$no isomeric transitions from the decay of this isomer have been reported in the literature. Transition to the 119, (3)- level is suggested by evaluators. If this transition has 100% I(|g+ce) branching, then B(M3)(W.u.)=1.02|*10{-4} {I+12-11}. E4 transition to the g.s., (2)- is also possible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from level-energy difference; |g to g.s. reported in {+192}Re IT decay (61 s), but E|g unstated by authors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 159.3 (2011St21), 159 (2012Al05). 
RI Relative I|g (arbitrary units) observed during the 75 |ms recording interval. On this scale, I(K|a| x ray)=550 {I45} (E|g=60.6 {I2}), I(K|b| x ray)=154 {I31} (E|g=69.5 {I4}). 
M the relative intensities of x- and |g-rays imply |a(K)exp|?1.4 if |w(K)=0.955 for Re and most or all I(K| x ray) is associated with this transition. This suggests M1 multipolarity (|a(K)=1.12). If the 160|g directly de-excited the isomer in {+192}Re, this M1 transition would be strongly hindered (B(M1)(W.u.)|?3|*10{+-8}), so 2005Ca02 suggest that it may instead depopulate a state that is fed by an unobserved low-energy transition (possibly E1) from the isomeric state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2005Ca02. Other: 145.2 keV and I|g=100 {i11} (2011St21). 2011St21 propose that 145-keV transition connects the (9/2-) and (5/2+) states. The intensity (not listed) of the observed x rays is in agreement for this connection, noted in 2011St21. 
M$Proposed in 2011St21. 2005Ca02 deduced hindrance factors for isomeric transition: HF=70 for M2 and 1000 for E2 (2005Ca02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
I|g(158|')/(I|g(79|')+I|g(101|'))=0.90 {I3}. 
M Q from |g asymmetry; not M2 from intensity balance at 432 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$631.5 {I3} in {+112}Sn({+58}Ni,2pn|g) 
RI$other: 55 {I14} in {+112}Sn({+58}Ni,2pn|g). Unweighted average is 77 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentative assignment (2014ThZZ). 2021Zh52 state "..the 80 keV transition was extremely weak and its correlation with 112 keV was barely visible above the background, presumably due to its large internal conversion coefficient". In 2014ThZZ, a weak 80-keV |g is shown in spectral Fig. 7.7a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) consistent with Q, |DJ=2 or D+Q, |DJ=0; intensity balance arguments in ({+29}Si,3n|g) favor M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q) suggests dipole transition, but intensity balance suggests E2 in ({+29}Si,3n|g) (1988Dr06); level scheme requires the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.28 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2}. 
I|g(157.6|')/I|g(79|' and 101|')=1.07 {I3} (1998Ki20). 
M Q from |g(|q); intensity balance at 287 level precludes M2 for either or both of 287|g and Q 463|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I20}. 
I|g(157.6|')/I|g(79|' and 101|')=1.1 {I3} (1998Ki20). 
M see comment on 287|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.25 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I7} consistent with stretched Q or D+Q, |DJ=0 transition; intensity balance favors M1 (1988Dr06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.06 {I17} suggests D transition, but intensity balance suggests E2 (1988Dr06); level scheme requires the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average from ({+30}Si,3n|g) and ({+58}Ni,2pn|g). 
E$other: 130.8 {I4} from |a decay. 
M$from |a(K)exp in |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.05 {I1} (1994Da02) and (582|g)(228|g)(|q) (1994Da02). |g|g(|q) is consistent with 2-2-0 cascade with mult=Q for first transition 
X(E0/E2)=0.04 {I1} (1994Da02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$27 {I4} (1992Bo21); 30 {I4} (1992Sc16) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I3} (1994Da02) and (448|g)(378|g)(|q) (1994Da02). |g|g(|q) is consistent with 6-4-2 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.06 {I1} (1994Da02) and (532|g)(228|g)(|q) (1994Da02). |g|g(|q) is consistent with 4-4-2 cascade, mult=Q for first transition 
X(E0/E2)=0.09 {I1} (1994Da02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.13 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.046 {I15} (1994Da02) and systematics 
X(E0/E2)=0.06 {I1} (1994Da02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$value seems too high by a factor of at least 3 when compared to branching ratios from two (HI,xn|g) studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1990Ba29, uncertainty assigned by the evaluator. I|g=3.5 {I5} (1990Ba29). 1987We06 report E|g=413.6 {I2}, I|g=8 {I2}. From a spectrum I|g|?5 (1989We06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp=5.7 {I4} (1992Sc16). Other: |a(K)exp=5 {I1} (1992Bo21). |d=-0.7 {I+3-6} (from (HI,xn|g) (1990Ba29)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Reported by 1992Sc16 only. 
|d=-2.7 {I+11-27} or -0.16 {I+17-21} (from (HI,xn|g) (1990Ba29)). 
CC$|a brackets combined range for M1 and E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Placement from 1990Ba29; E|g from {+173}Ir |e decay (2.20 s), {+173}Ir |e decay (9.0 s). 
M$from |a|?0.5, as deduced from I|g(49.6|g), I|g(91.6|g), and |a for 91.6|g (1990Ba29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 158.7 keV {I2} (1992Bo21) and 158.6 keV {I2} (1992Sc16). Other value: 158.6 (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 276.4 keV {I2} (1992Bo21) and 276.3 keV {I2} (1992Sc16). Other value: 276.3 keV (1994Ki01). 
M$from |a(L)exp=0.035 {I3}, |a(M)exp=0.0099 {I12} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$average of 532.4 keV {I2} (1992Bo21) and 532.4 keV {I2} (1992Sc16). Other value: 532.4 keV (1994Ki01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.120 {I9}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I2}, 0.0063 {I16}; A{-22}=+0.00 {I12}, A{-44}=0.30 {I12} in |g|g(|q) (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 342.8 keV {I2} (1992Bo21) and 342.3 keV {I2} (1994Ki01). Other value: 342.3 keV (1994Ki01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.040 {I3}, 0.014 {I2} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$average of 554.5 keV {I5} (1992Bo21) and 554.5 keV (1994Ki01). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.069 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.014 {I3}; A{-22}=+0.01 {I8}, A{-44}=+0.20 {I10} in |g|g(|q) (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$average of 895.9 keV {I5} (1992Bo21) and 895.2 keV (1994Ki01). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I12}; A{-22}=-0.11 {I10}, A{-44}=-0.14 {I11} in |g|g(|q) (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 394.4 keV {I2} (1992Bo21) and 393.9 keV {I2} (1992Sc16). Other value: 394.0 keV (1994Ki01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.032 {I7} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$average of 1261.5 keV {I5} (1992Bo21) and 1261.7 keV (1994Ki01). 
M,MR$from A{-22}=+0.27 {I11}, A{-44}=+0.04 {I12} in |g|g(|q) (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$average of 818.5 keV {I5} (1992Bo21) and 818.4 keV (1994Ki01). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.002 {I1} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$ from {+174}Os Adopted dataset in ENSDF database 
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler from half-life of 2+ state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.083 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.044 {I3}, and |a(M)exp=0.0115 {I8}. 
E|g=259.7 {I2}, I|g=1000 {I55} (1990Bo19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.039 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0141 {I8}, and |a(M)exp=0.004 {I1}. 
E|g=346.7 {I2}, I|g=809 {I44} (1990Bo19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.114 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0173 {I18}, |a(M)exp=0.0072 {I10}, A{-2}=+0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.27 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.079 {I5}, 0.0084 {I9}, |a(M)exp=0.0046 {I15}; A{-2}=+0.001 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.042 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.0077 {I12}, |a(M)exp=0.0029 {I13}; A{-2}=+0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences. Not observed directly, but required from the |g|g coincidence relationship. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-{0.81 {I2}}, A{-4}=-{0.02 {I3}}. See 1983Dr05 for details. 
MR$-0.76 {I2}, assuming K=7/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From A{-2}=-{0.81 {I2}}, A{-4}=-{0.02 {I3}}. See 1983Dr05 for details. 
MR$-0.17 {I2}, assuming K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
From the half-life measurements for the 132-keV level 2005Mo33 estimate a B(E2)=0.82 {i6} e{+2}b{+2}. 
Q{-t}(2+)=6.4 {i3} eb (2005De48) 
M A{-2}=0.18 {i4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {i6} (1982Dr03). |a{-L}(exp)=0.72 {i5}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.18 {i1} (1994Ki01), theory: |a{-L}(E2)=0.746 {i11}, |a{-M}(E2)=0.190 {i3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.222 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i1} (1982Dr03). |a{-K}(exp)=0.079 {i3}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.037 {i3}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.0094 {i9} (1994Ki01). 1982Dr03 report |a{-L}(exp)|?0.029, theory: |a{-K}=0.0801 {i12}, |a{-L}=0.0385 {i6}, |a{-M}=0.00958 {i14}. 
Q{-t}(4+)=6.9 {i2} eb (2005De48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Values for the (362.7|g+363.5|g) combination: A{-2}=0.242 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.08 {i1} (1982Dr03). |a{-K}(exp)=0.036 {i2}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.014 {i2} (1994Ki01). 1982Dr03 report |a{-K}(exp)=0.040 {i7}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.019 {i5}, theory: |a{-K}=0.0366 {i6}, |a{-L}=0.01234 {i18}. 
Q{-t}(6+)=7.4 {i3} eb (2005De48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Unresolved doublet. Other component is 372.6 kev deexciting the 1396 keV level. 
M Values for combined 372.1 and 372.6 |g rays (1994Ki01): A{-2}=+0.23 {i11}, A{-4}=+0.13 {i11}; |a{-K}(exp)(372.1|g + 372.6|g)=0.036 {i5}, theory (average): |a{-K}(E2)=0.0344 {i5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=+0.04 {i6}, A{-4}=+0.29 {i9} (1994Ki01). |a{-K}(exp)=0.082 {i3}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.0128 {i11}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.036 {i6} (1994Ki01), theory: |a{-K}=0.01041 {i23}, |a{-L}=0.00219 {i4}, |a{-M}=0.000517 {i9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=-0.16 {i8}, A{-4}=+0.37 {i9} (1994Ki01); |a{-K}(exp)=0.0130 {i19} (1994Ki01), theory: |a{-K}=0.00765 {i17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
This transition observed as member of an unresolved doublet in (HI,xn|g) (1982Dr03). The other component assigned as deexciting the 3429 keV level. 
M,MR A{-2}=+0.00 {i4}, A{-4}=+0.14 {i7} (1994Ki01). |a{-K}(exp)=0.097 {i4}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.020 {i2}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.0053 {i9} (1994Ki01), theory: |a{-K}=0.0124 {i5}, |a{-L}=0.00252 {i6}, |a{-M}=0.000592 {i14}. E0 component inferred by 1994Ki01 from their conversion coefficient values. For the unresolved doublet 1982Dr03 obtain A{-2}=0.18 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i3}, and |a{-tot}(exp)=0.017 {i2}, theory: |a{-tot}(M1+E2)=0.0157. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=-0.11 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i7} (1994Ki01). |a{-K}(exp)=0.0049 {i9} (1994Ki01), theory: a{-K}=0.00506 {i8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Unresolved doublet in singles spectra; the other component has 432.9 keV. 
M For the (432.3|g+432.9|g) combination 1982Dr03 quote: A{-2}=0.28 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i1}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.037 {i7}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.007 {i3}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.024, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00682. Support from g.s. band membership (1994Ki01); agrees with J|p=6{++} for the 762 keV final level. 
Q{-t}(8+)=7.8 {i3} eb (2005De48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=-0.34 {i19}, A{-4}=+0.18 {i20} (1994Ki01). |a{-K}(exp)=0.0052 {i18} (1994Ki01), theory: |a{-K}(M1+E2)=0.0075 {i25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Unresolved doublet. See discussion and data in comments for the 372.1 keV |g ray from the 771 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=+0.00 {i5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {i6} (1994Ki01). |a{-K}(exp)=0.045 {i6} (1994Ki01), theory: |a{-K}=0.0135 {i10}. E0 component inferred in 1994Ki01 based on the large experimental |a{-K} value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.264 {i8}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i1} (1982Dr03). |a{-K}(exp)=0.020 {i3}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.005 {i2} (1982Dr03), theory: |a{-K}=0.0181, |a{-L}=0.00466 
Q{-t}(10+)=8.2 {i6} eb (2005De48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {i3} (1982Dr03). |a{-tot}(exp)=0.002 {i3} (1982Dr03). theory: |a{-tot}(E1)=0.0022. See also note for this transition in the (HI,xn|g) dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.32 {i4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {i4} (1982Dr03). See also comment for the 584.9 keV |g regarding |a values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.23 {i4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {i4} (1982Dr03). Angular correlation parameter R=1.6 {i1} (1988Bu19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.273 {i9}, A{-4}=-0.112 {i11} (1982Dr03). |a{-K}(exp)=0.0135 {i15}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.0024 {i12} (1982Dr03). theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0145, |a{-L}(E2)=0.0035 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.30 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i3} (1982Dr03). Experimental |a values for the unresolved (584.9|g+587.0|g) combination: |a{-K}(exp)=0.0120 {i2}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.0023 {i12} (1982Dr03), theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0121, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00273 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Unresolved doublet in singles spectra: the other component is E|g=432.3 keV. See Comment for the 432.3 keV |g deexciting the 1193 keV level for angular distribution and |a data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Unresolved doublet, second component not placed in the level scheme. 
M For this unresolved doublet 1982Dr03 quote: A{-2}=0.18 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i3}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.017 {i2}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0105, |a{-K}(M1)=0.0299. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.22 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.12 {i7} (1982Dr03). |a{-tot}(exp)<0.015 (1982Dr03), theory: |a{-tot}(E2)=0.0153 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a{-tot}(exp)>0.09 (1982Dr03), theory: |a{-tot}(M1)=0.0289, |a{-tot}(E2)=0.0108. See note for this transition in the (HI,xn|g) dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}(exp)=0.079 {i3}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.037 {i3}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.0094 {i9}, theory: |a{-K}=0.0801 {i12}, |a{-L}=0.0385 {i6}, |a{-M}=0.00958 {i14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
No |g ray reported. It is not possible to decide whether the 650-kev peak in the |g spectrum shown in 1994Ki01 belongs to the {+178}Ir |e decay or if it is due to some contaminant. In view of this, the E0 assignment in 1994Ki01 is also questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a{-K}(exp)=0.036 {i2}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.014 {i2}, theory: |a{-K}=0.0366 {i6}, |a{-L}=0.01234 {i18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M If the J|p=0+ value for the 650 keV level can be confirmed, this |g ray must have pure E2 multipolarity. Unfortunately, it probably can not (see Comments for 650.4 keV |g ray and 650 keV level). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q) and |a. Values from combined 372.1 and 372.6 |g rays: A{-2}=+0.23 {i11}, A{-4}=+0.13 {i11}; |a{-K}(exp)(372.1|g + 372.6|g)=0.036 {i5}, theory (average): |a{-K}=0.0344 {i5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a: A{-2}=+0.04 {i6}, A{-4}=+0.29 {i9}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.082 {i3}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.0128 {i11}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.036 {i6}, theory: |a{-K}=0.01041 {i23}, |a{-L}=0.00219 {i4}, |a{-M}=0.000517 {i9}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 2.1 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a: A{-2}=-0.16 {i8}, A{-4}=+0.37 {i9}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.0130 {i19}, theory: |a{-K}=0.00765 {i17}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 1 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a: A{-2}=+0.00 {i4}, A{-4}=+0.14 {i7}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.097 {i4}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.020 {i2}, |a{-M}(exp)=0.0053 {i9}, theory: |a{-K}=0.0124 {i5}, |a{-L}=0.00252 {i6}, |a{-M}=0.000592 {i14}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 9.4 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.23 {i12}, A{-4}=-0.19 {i14}. 1994Ki01 estimate an 8 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a: A{-2}=-0.11 {i6}, A{-4}=-0.09 {i7}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.0049 {i9}, theory: a{-K}=0.00506 {i8}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 1.2 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M 1994Ki01 do not report any data for their multipolarity assignment. Agrees with J|p=6{++} for the 762 keV final level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a: A{-2}=-0.34 {i19}, A{-4}=+0.18 {i20}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.0052 {i18}, theory: |a{-K}=0.007 {i3}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 15 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q) and |a: A{-2}=+0.00 {i5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {i6}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.045 {i6}, theory: |a{-K}=0.0135 {i10}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 17 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.23 {i9}, A{-4}=-0.06 {i11}. 1994Ki01 estimate a 16 % M1 admixture for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Values for the (362.7|g+363.5|g) combination: A{-2}=0.242 {i7}, A{-4}=-0.08 {i1}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.040 {i7}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.019 {i5}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0365, |a{-L}(E2)=0.0123 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
This is a member of an unresolved doublet. The other component is placed in the level scheme deexciting the 3429 keV level. 
M Values for this unresolved doublet: A{-2}=0.18 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i3}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.017 {i2}, theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.031, |a{-K}(E2)=0.0105. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Unresolved doublet in singles spectra: the other component has 432.9 keV. 
M Values for the (432.3|g+432.9|g) combination: A{-2}=0.28 {i1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i1}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.037 {i7}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.007 {i3}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.024, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00682 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.264 {i8}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i1}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.020 {i3}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.005 {i2}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0181, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00466 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.31 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {i3}. |a{-tot}(exp)=0.002 {i3}. The angular distribution coefficients suggest a possible |DJ=0 dipole transition. The theoretical conversion coefficients are |a{-tot}(E1)=0.0022, |a{-tot}(M1)=0.0129, thus E1 seems the most likely value, but either value is possible in view of the experimental uncertainty in the conversion coefficient, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.273 {i9}, A{-4}=-0.112 {i11}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.0135 {i15}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.0024 {i12}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0145, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00348 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0.30 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.14 {i3}. Experimental |a values for the (584.9|g+587.0|g) combination: |a{-K}(exp)=0.0120 {i2}, |a{-L}(exp)=0.0023 {i12}, theory: |a{-K}(E2)=0.0121, |a{-L}(E2)=0.00273 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Unresolved doublet in singles spectra: the other component has 432.3 keV. See Comment for 432.3 keV |g deexciting the 1193 keV level for angular distribution and |a data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
This is a member of an unresolved doublet. The other component is placed in the level scheme deexciting a tentative 1023-keV level. 
M Values for this unresolved doublet: A{-2}=0.18 {i2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {i3}; |a{-K}(exp)=0.017 {i2}, theory: |a{-K}(M1)=0.031, |a{-K}(E2)=0.0105. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a{-tot}(exp)>0.09 (1982Dr03), theory: |a{-tot}(M1)=0.0289, |a{-tot}(E2)=0.0108. Based on the very high experimental |a value, 1982Dr03 suggest that this transition has a strong E0 component. This disagrees with the tentative spin assignments in their level scheme. Note also that |a{-tot}(M3,theory)=0.176. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
1988Bu19 report E|g=772.5 {i2} keV, I|g=4.0. 
M Angular correlation parameter R=0.9 {i1} (1988Bu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
 689.0 5 (E0) ? Transition not detected in |g spectra, but strong lines seen in the electron spectrum (1982Dr03), implying an E0 transition. Tentative placement by 1982Dr03 suggested by similar E0 transition in {+180}Os. Not adopted in current evaluation due to the weakness of the evidence for its placement. FL=761.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.13 {I7} 
E$ (8+) to (6+) assignment listed in table I of 2009Ku24 seems in error according to their level-scheme figure 1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from |e decay. 
M,MR D+Q from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,4n|g) for intraband transition with |d=-5.3 {I7} or +0.29 {I4}; E2(+M1) from subshell ratios in |e decay with |d>2.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from ({+16}O,4n|g). 
RI average excludes 11.1 {I12} in ({+34}S,5n|g) |g|g coin. Weighted average of all data is 13.6 {I26}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average from ({+34}S,5n|g) and ({+16}O,4n|g). 
M Q from |g(|q) in ({+16}O,4n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q in ({+34}S,5n|g) for intraband |g. 
RI from ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin. Other branching: 20 {I2} from ({+30}Si,5n|g), 17 {I3} from ({+16}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 11.6 {I15} and 13 {I4} in ({+34}S,5n|g). Other branching: 20.7 {I22} in ({+30}Si,5n|g). 
M (D+Q) in ({+34}S,5n|g), D in ({+30}Si,5n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average from ({+16}O,4n|g) and ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin. Other branching: 24.3 {I23} from ({+30}Si,5n|g). 
M D+Q in ({+34}S,5n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from ({+30}Si,5n|g). 
A 333|g is placed from 1900 level in ({+30}Si,5n|g), but from 4593 level in ({+34}S,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average from ({+30}Si,5n|g) and ({+34}S,5n|g) singles data. 
M (D+Q) in ({+34}S,5n|g), D in ({+30}Si,5n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 29 {I6} from ({+28}Si,5n|g) and 20 {I4} and 15 {I3} from ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin. 
M D+Q in ({+34}S,5n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average from ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin data. 
M (D+Q) in ({+34}S,5n|g), D in ({+30}Si,5n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average from ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin data. 
M (D+Q) in ({+34}S,5n|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI weighted average from ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin data. Other branching: 64 {I21} from ({+30}Si,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
333|g placed from 1900 level in ({+30}Si,5n|g), but from 4593 level in ({+34}S,5n|g). 
RI weighted average from ({+34}S,5n|g) singles and |g|g coin data is 15 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from Adopted Gammas. K:L3:(M1+M2):M3=400 {I100}:770 {I150}:240 {I50}:210 {I50} (2000Ro41) implies E2(+M1), |d>2.7. 
%I|g=7.5 {I3} assuming suggested normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI from intensity balance at 86 and 100 levels, I(|g+ce)(14|g)|< 930 {I30} and I(|g+ce)(14|g)|>703 {I59}, respectively. 
E from level energy difference; transition not observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Transition inferred from |g|g coin relations; E|g from level energy difference. 
I|g(220)/I|g(24)=750 {I150}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Transition inferred from |g|g coin relations; E|g from level energy difference. 
I|g(321)/I|g(34)=400 {I300}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR DCO ratio=0.8 {I2}. Consistent with +0.4|<|d(D,Q)|<+2.9 if |DJ=1 or -0.3|<|d(D,Q)|<+0.5 if |DJ=0 (1993Ba45). Also consistent with |DJ=2 implied by Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR DCO ratio=0.8 {I2}. Consistent with +0.4|<|d(D,Q)|<+2.9 if |DJ=1 or -0.3|<|d(D,Q)|<+0.5 if |DJ=0 (1993Ba45); also consistent with |DJ=2 implied by Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
DCO ratio=1.38 {I17} (private communication to evaluator from J. Burde); misprinted as 1.38 {I7} in table 1 of 1992Bu14. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI from private communication to evaluator from J. Burde; misprinted as 59 {I6} in table 1 of 1992Bu14. 
DCO ratio=0.96 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI from private communication to evaluator from J. Burde; misprinted as 21 {I8} in table 1 of 1992Bu14. 
DCO ratio=1.09 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(exp)=0.84 {I11}, deduced from transition intensity balance at 243.0 level. 
A{-2}=+0.02 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: >6 from |g(|q) in{+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 
RI$other: 42 {I9} in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: -7 {I3} from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: +1.8 {I4} from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 58 {I21} from {+180}Ir |e decay, 59 {I18} from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed, and 64 {I15} from {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: -0.20 {I20} from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from {+180}Ir |e decay. Others: 40 {I12} from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed and 38 {I16} from {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I11} from {+180}Ir |e |e decay and 55 {I12} from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of {+180}Ir |e decay, {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed, and {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: -12 {I4} from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay 
E$placed from 1515.6-keV, 4+ level in {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: -0.8 {I7} from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g). 
E$placed from 1515.6-keV, 4+ level in {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+180}Ir |e decay. Other: +0.02 {I5} from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g), |D|p=yes from level scheme. 
RI$0ther: |<14 from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g). Other: 363.2 {I5} in {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g),{+150}Nd({+34}S,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed. Others: 15 {I8} from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g),{+150}Nd({+34}S,4n|g) and 62 {I12} from {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g):Delayed. Others: 8 {I8} from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g),{+150}Nd({+34}S,4n|g) and 42 {I8} from {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g), large value of |d favors M1+E2 assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g), |D|p=yes from level scheme 
E$from {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+150}Nd({+36}S,6n|g),{+150}Nd({+34}S,4n|g). Other: 51 {I14} in {+166}Er({+18}O,4n|g),{+168}Er({+16}O,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance at 132 level assuming no |e feeding to this level. Others: I|g=84.6 {I20} (1994Ki01), I|g=45 {I2} (1992Bo19), and I|g=95 {I5} (1973LaZC) 
$|a(L)exp=0.737 {I24}, |a(M)exp=0.186 {I6} (1994Ki01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.5 {I3}, A{-4}=+1.1 {I3} 
M$Q from |g|g(|q), |D|p=no from level scheme 
E$placement from 1994Ki01. A 604.5 {I5} transition with I|g=1.3 {I4} is placed by 1992Bo19 from a 7- level at 1861. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from 1994Ki01 and 1992Bo19. Other: I|g=6.2 {I6} (1973HaVR). 
$|a(L)exp=0.0097 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.0032 {I11} (1994Ki01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0412 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.0070 {I17} |a(M)exp=0.0016 {I4} (1994Ki01) 
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp|<0.025 (1994Ki01) 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp, |DJ=2 from level scheme requires E2 
E$placement from 1994Ki01. A 461.7 {I4} transition with I|g=1.3 {I5} is placed by 1992Bo19 from a 8+ level at 1256. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0049 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0008 {I2} (1994Ki01) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} 
MR$Other: >6 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$placement from 1994Ki01. A 257.6 {I3} transition with I|g=0.8 {I2} is placed by 1992Bo19 from a 7- level at 1861. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.098 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0179 {I9} |a(M)exp=0.0044 {I7} (1994Ki01) 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of values from 1994Ki01 and 1992Bo19. Other: I|g=9.1 {I9} (1973HaVR). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0154 {I13} (1994Ki01) 
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from 1994Ki01. Others: 17 {I2} (1992Bo19), 14.4 {I14} (1973HaVR). 
$|a(K)exp=0.0032 {I3} (1994Ki01) 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$1994Ki01 report observation of a 4+ level at 1515, however, no depopulating transitions from such a level are given in their Table 5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp(699|g doublet)=0.025 {I7} (1988Li02). |a(K)exp(699|g doublet)=0.043 {I6} (1990Dr02). Transition may contain a significant E0 component (1990Dr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.081 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.0012 {I1} (1990Dr02); |a(K)exp=0.085 {I25} (1988Li02); |a(K)exp=0.094 {I8} (1982Dr03). |d=-0.8 {I4}. A{-2}=-0.10 {I5} suggests dipole (1988Li02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0197 {I9} (1990Dr02); |a(K)exp=0.025 {I6}, |a(L)exp<0.009 (1982Dr03); and |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} (1988Li02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.094 {I7} (1990Dr02); |a(K)exp=0.055 {I22} (1988Li02); |a(K)exp=0.090 {I9} (1982Dr03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.014 {I1}, |a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp=0.0027 {I3} (1990Dr02); |a(K)exp=0.019 {I7} (1988Li02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from 1982Dr03. 
RI$from I|g(51|g)/I|g(1134|g)=2.1 {I3} (1982Dr03) and I|g(1134|g)=3.5 {I7} (1988Li02). 
M$from |a(exp) deduced from intensity balance in 1982Dr03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q), M1+E2 from |a(K)exp=0.058 {I17} (1988Li02). 
MR$Other: 0.9 {I+8-5} from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0131 {I4} (1990Dr02); |a(K)exp=0.016 {I3} (1988Li02); |a(K)exp=0.0166 {I21}, |a(L)exp=0.0042 {I9} (1982Dr03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.012 (consistent with E2) if other member of the 699|g doublet is M1+E2+E0 (1990Dr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp(524|g doublet)=0.014 {I2} (1990Dr02); |a(K)exp=0.019 {I12} (1988Li02). Other: 1982Dr03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.015 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.004 {I1} (1990Dr02). |a(K)exp=0.050 {I15} measured by 1988Li02 is inaccurate because of contribution from nearby transitions to the conversion electron intensity, that could not be resolved in their measurement. Consequently, the M1+E2 multipolarity assigned by 1988Li02 seems to be incorrect. Other: 1982Dr03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=81 {I14} 
$I|g(prompt)=447.7 {I15} 
E$231.3 {I1}, DCO=1.05 {I11} from delayed transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1.1 {I5} 
$I|g(prompt)=34 {I4} 
M$E1 listed by 2003Cu03 in the table of delayed transitions is inconsistent with |DJ|p 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=251.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=17.2 {I11} 
$I|g(prompt)=61 {I3} 
M$|DJ=0 transition, E2 from table prompt low K |g-transitions, but M1 from the text of 2003Cu03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=0.5 {I3} 
E$1053.3 listed in table of prompt low K |g-transitions seems a misprint; should probably be 1035.3 (or 1037 given in authors' low K level scheme). 
M$possibly E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=74 {I3} 
$I|g(prompt)=343 {I11} 
M$DCO=1.03 {I11} from delayed transitions 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=434.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1.4 {I6} 
$I|g(prompt)=12 {I3} 
$DCO=0.96 {I13} from prompt transitions 
M$|DJ=0 transition listed in the table of prompt |g-transitions, inconsistent with |DJ|p, possibly M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=4.0 {I5} 
E$From delayed |g-ray measurements, E|g=655 from low K level scheme; not listed in authors' table of prompt low K |g-transitions. 
M$DCO=0.68 {I21} from delayed transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=97 {I12} 
$29/2- to 27/2- in the 7/2[514] band listed in the table of prompt low K |g-transitions is a misprint; should be 35/2- to 33/2- in band based on 23/2-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=1.0 {I9} 
$35/2- to 29/2- in table of prompt low K |g-transitions is a misprint; should be 35/2- to 33/2- 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=411.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From the level scheme of high K isomer feeding and decay; not listed in authors' the table of delayed transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=4.7 {I6} 
$DCO=0.6 {I3} from delayed transitions 
M$|DJ=1 transition; E1 listed by 2003Cu03 in the table of delayed transitions is inconsistent with |DJ|p 
E$620 in the level scheme of high K isomer feeding and decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=13.4 {I7} 
M$DCO=0.92 {I17} from delayed transitions 
M$|DJ=0 transition 
$Initial J|p=33/2+ in table of delayed transitions seems a misprint; it should be 33/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1.2 {I3} 
$Initial J|p=33/2+ in table of delayed transitions seems a misprint; it should be 33/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=20 {I4} 
$43/2- to 39/2- in the table of prompt low K |g-transitions is a misprint; should be 43/2- to 41/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=1.0 {I5} 
M$M1 listed by 2003Cu03 is inconsistent with |DJ|p 
$(43/2+) to (43/2+) as listed in table of prompt high K |g-transitions is a misprint; it should be (43/2+) to (43/2-) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=29 {I7} 
$Assignment to the |n1/2[521] band in the table of prompt low K |g-transitions seems a misprint; should be in |n7/2[514] band as in authors' low K level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(prompt)=25.8 {I20} 
$Assignment to 7/2[514] band in table of prompt low K |g-transitions seems a misprint; should be in K=23/2- band as in authors' low K level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+182}Ir |e decay (1994Ki01). E0 component is small as indicated by |a(K)exp=0.0095 {I20} (2007Ca04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.053 {I8} (2007Ca04), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-11 +4 from |g|g(|q) (1994Ki01), lower uncertainty not given by 1994Ki01. Evaluators' estimate from A{-2} and A{-4} values of 1994Ki01 gives -2.5>|d>+0.45 
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.13 {I2} (2007Ca04), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2+M1)
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}(E0/E2)=4.4 {I12}, X(E0/E2)=0.31 {I8} (2007Ca04,from |e decay) 
M$E0+(M1)+E2 or abnormal M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1982Li04 and 1995Ku14. Other: 52 {I6} (1982Fa01). 
MR$weighted average of +0.11 {I6} (1982Li04) and +0.27 {I5} (1982Fa01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 111 {I4} (2007Ca04), 76.9 {I19} (1994Ki01), 84 {I8} (1972Ak03) and 77 {I4} (1972HuZL) 
$(|a(L1)exp+|a(L2)exp)/|a(L3)exp=1.40 {I7} (2007Ca04) 
E$126.8 {I7} (1972Ak03), 127.1 {I3} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$11.8 {I5} (1994Ki01), 5.5 {I10} (1972Ak03) and 7.6 {I8} (1972HuZL) 
EKC$other: 0.038 {I12} (1972HuZL) 
E$393.0 {I5} (1972Ak03), 393.3 {I3} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0)+E2+M1
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}(E0/E2)=0.36 {I31}, X(E0/E2)=0.009 {I8} (2007Ca04) 
M$E0+M1+E2 or abnormal M1+E2; E0 component is small as indicated by |a(K)exp value 
RI$7.0 {I4} (1994Ki01), 12.0 {I10} (1972Ak03) and 12.5 {I10} (1972HuZL) 
E$763.4 {I3} (1972Ak03), 764.4 {I3} (1972HuZL) 
MR$from (764|g)(127|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.26 {I5}. The ce data (1972HuZL) give M1+E2 with |d=1.4 {I+11-8} 
EKC$other: 0.011 {I3} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$6.5 {I2} (1994Ki01), 15.0 {I15} (1972Ak03), 13.1 {I10} (1972HuZL) 
E$890.8 {I4} (1972Ak03), 891.0 {I4} (1972HuZL) 
EKC$other: 0.011 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|d(Q/D)|>+68 from (639|g)(273|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I19} 
RI$2.3 {I3} (1994Ki01) 2.7 {I3} (1972Ak03), 2.30 {I23} (1972HuZL) 
E$638.8 {I6} (1972Ak03), 638.9 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from (912|g)(127|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4}. ce data give M1+E2 with |d<1 
RI$17.5 {I3} (1994Ki01), 23 {I3} (1972Ak03), 20.3 {I10} (1972HuZL) 
E$912.3 {I4} (1972Ak03), 912.3 {I3} (1972HuZL) 
EKC$other: 0.0105 {I25} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1.90 {I6} (1994Ki01), 1.70 {I20} (1972HuZL) 
E$760.0 {I4} (1972HuZL); |g not in 1972Ak03 
(759|g)(273|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.33 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}(E0/E2)=12.9 {I21}, X(E0/E2)=0.60 {I10} (2007Ca04) 
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.053 {I8} (2007Ca04), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 
RI$1.20 {I4} (1994Ki01), 2.3 {I4} (1972Ak03), 2.1 {I3} (1972HuZL) 
E$1033.4 {I6} (1972Ak03), 1033.3 {I5} (1972HuZL) 
$|d(Q/D)=+46 from (1033|g)(127|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.42 {I4} (1994Ki01), 0.7 {I3} for 1160.7 {I8} |g ray and 2.6 {I4} for 1158.0 {I8} |g ray (1972Ak03); 3.1 {I3} for 1159.2 {I5} |g ray (1972HuZL); 3.2 {I2} for 1160.0 {I5} |g ray (1970FiZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$12.9 {I4} (1994Ki01), 10.2 {I10} (1972Ak03), 7.4 {I7} (1972HuZL) 
E$790.1 {I4} (1972Ak03), 790.0 {I3} (1972HuZL) 
M,MR$from (790|g)(273|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I6}. The ce data (1972HuZL) give M1+E2 with |d<2 
$|a(K)exp=0.025 {I8} (1972HuZL), 0.014 {I4} (for I|g=12.9 in 1994Ki01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
(1063|g)(127|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.07 {I16} 
RI$6.0 {I2} (1994Ki01), 5.0 {I10} (1972Ak03), 5.0 {I4} (1972HuZL) 
E$1063.9 {I4} (1972Ak03), 1063.4 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}(E0/E2)=30 {I5}, X(E0/E2)=1.24 {I20} (2007Ca04) 
$Total conversion coefficient from |a(K)exp=0.13 {I2} (2007Ca04), multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account for other shells 
MR$-11 +4 (1994Ki01) from (978|g)(273|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I12}; lower uncertainty not given. Evaluators' estimate from A{-2} and A{-4} values of 1994Ki01 gives -2.5>|d>+0.45 
RI$1.21 {I10} (1994Ki01), 1.6 {I2} (1972Ak03), 1.4 {I2} (1972HuZL) 
E$977.1 {I8} (1972Ak03), 977.1 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
(1251|g)(127|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I12} 
RI$2.96 {I14} (1994Ki01), 3.2 {I3} (1972Ak03), 4.4 {I4} (1972HuZL) 
E$1252.0 {I8} (1972Ak03), 1251.0 {I10} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}(E0/E2)=4.4 {I12}, X(E0/E2)=0.31 {I8} (2007Ca04) 
M$E0+(M1)+E2 or abnormal M1+E2 
$E|g=1265.8 {I6}, I|g=2.5 {I3} (1972Ak03); E|g=1265.8 {I10}, I|g=3.6 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$from (999|g)(273|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I6} 
RI$5.6 {I2} (1994Ki01), 3.3 {I4} (1972Ak03), 3.6 {I4} (1972HuZL) 
E$999.9 {I5} (1972Ak03), 999.2 {I3} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.44 {I4} (1994Ki01), 1.1 {I2} (1972Ak03), 1.10 {I15} (1972HuZL) 
E$282.0 {I7} (1972Ak03), 281.6 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$2.35 {I6} (1994Ki01) 
RI$2.0 {I3} (1972Ak03), 2.20 {I25} (1972HuZL) 
E$433.0 {I7} (1972Ak03), 432.8 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from |a(K)exp|?0.033 (1972HuZL) is inconsistent with |D(J|p) 
RI$5.00 {I14} (1994Ki01), 2.7 {I9} (1972Ak03), 4.2 {I6} (1972HuZL) 
E$581.9 {I7} (1972Ak03), 581.4 {I4} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$treated as questionable by the evaluators since a |g of 0.49 intensity should have been seen by 2007Ca04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Placement from 2004Ca07. 1994Ki01 placed a weak 483.7|g from 1277.8 level 
RI$0.18 {I4} (1994Ki01), 0.9 {I1} (1972Ak03), 1.20 {I15} (1972HuZL) 
E$484.0 {I8} (1972Ak03), 483.0 {I5} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1 or E0+(M1)+E2 (2007Ca04) 
$ q{+2}(E0/E2)=1.9 {I7}, X(E0/E2)=0.12 {I5} (2007Ca04) 
$E|g=1217.6 {I6}, I|g=3.4 {I3} (1972Ak03); E|g=1217.0 {I10}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$0.48 {I11} (1994Ki01), 2.6 {I3} (1972Ak03), 1.50 {I20} (1972HuZL) 
E$227.7 {I5} (1972Ak03), 228.2 {I3} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2.09 {I9} (1994Ki01), 0.8 {I3} (1972Ak03), 1.30 {I15} (1972HuZL) 
E$1227.8 {I8} (1972Ak03), 1226.6 {I10} (1972HuZL) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=749.2 {I8}, I|g=1.0 {I2} (1972Ak03); E|g=751.1 {I5}, I|g=1.50 {I20} (1972HuZL). E|g=750.0 {I2}, I|g=1.6 {I2} (1970FiZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(182.3|g)/I|g(1253.6|g)=0.78 {I3} in 1994Ki01 and I|g(1253.6)=1.11 {I10} in 2007Ca04. I|g(182.3|g)/I|g(1253.6|g)=1.20 {I16} in 2007Ca04, 0.78 {I3} in 1994Ki01 and 0.37 {I15}, 0.47 {I12}, 0.63 {I11} in in-beam |g-ray studies suggests that the relative intensity of 1.33 {I18} in 2007Ca04 for 182.3|g is overestimated 
RI$1.37 {I6} (1994Ki01), 2.2 {I4} (1972Ak03), 2.6 {I3} (1972HuZL) 
E$179.8 {I3} (1972HuZL), 181.6 {I5} (1972Ak03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1994Ki01. |g not reported by 2007Ca04 and 1972HuZL, but reported by 1972Ak03 and 1970FiZZ 
RI$0.7 {I1} (1972Ak03), 0.6 {I1} (1970FiZZ) 
E$465.0 {I8} (1972Ak03), 464.7 {I4} (1970FiZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance at 4370 level (in |g|g data), |a(exp)(159|g)=0.26 for mult(312|g)=E2 and |a(exp)(159|g)=0.43 for mult(312|g)=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} for 859.2+860.1 
$|a(K)exp=0.0043 {I10} for 859.2+860.1 
$E1 in 1982Li04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} for doublet 
$I(|g+ce)=44 (1967Bu02) for doublet 
$E2 in 1982Li04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.57 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} for 182.4+182.7. 
$M1+E2 in 1982Li04 
RI$this |g ray superimposed by an impurity line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} for 859.2+860.1 
$|a(K)exp=0.0043 {I10} for 859.2+860.1 
$E2 in 1982Li04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 in 1982Li04 
$|g(|q) data for mixed 795|g and an impurity line 
M$|DJ=2, E2 assigned by 1982Li04; but in |g(|q) sign of A{-2} should be positive for such transitions. The negative sign of A{-2} may be due to contribution from an impurity line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} for 580.8+581.2. A{-2} and A{-4} are inconsistent with |DJ=1, E1 expected for 581.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,5n|g). 
RI other I(123|g):I(219|g)=~100:61 {I13} in {+186}W(|a,7n|g),Re(p,3n|g) (but 123|g was contaminated in that reaction), and 100 {I11}:26 {I3} from {+183}Os IT decay (|?30 ns). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 105 {I10} from IT decay (|?30 ns), 89 {I11} from (|a,7n|g). 
M D+Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 228.7 {I1} from ({+18}O,5n|g), 228.6 {I1} from |e decay and 228.9 {I2} from (|a,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 119.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 119.9 {I2} from |e decay. 
Other I|g: 29 {I6} from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Other I(166|g):I(322|g)=40 {I4}:100 {I10} from IT decay (|?30 ns). 49 {I7}:100 {I8} from (|a,7n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 165.7 {I2} from |e decay, 165.7 {I1} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 165.81 {I20} from (|a,7n|g). 
RI from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 461.9 {I2} from |e decay, 461.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,5n|g) and 461.8 {I2} from (|a,7n|g). 
RI from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 356.2 {I2} (|?32) from |e decay, 356.37 {I20} from (|a,7n|g). 
M Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 24 {I6} from (|a,7n|g) for possible doublet; 81 {I9} from IT decay (|?30 ns), presumably also for a doublet. 
MR -0.27 {I6} from (|a,7n|g) for presumed doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,5n|g). 
MR -0.18 {I6} from (|a,7n|g) for presumed doublet. 
Other I|g: 17 {I4} from {+186}W(|a,7n|g),Re(p,3n|g); 48 {I6} from {+183}Os IT decay (|?30 ns). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 587.8 in IT decay (|?30 ns), 588.2 {I2} from (|a,7n|g) 
M Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI uncertainty of 0 in 2001Sh41 appears to be a misprint; it should presumably be 1 as for other transitions of comparable intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 776.6 {I2} in (|a,7n|g), 776.8 in {+183}Os IT decay (|?30 ns). 
M Q intraband |g from ({+18}O,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M I(|g+ce)(133|g)/I(|g+ce)(256|g)|?1 in ({+18}O,5n|g) only if mult is E2 for 256|g and E1 for 133|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI from I(|g+ce)=100 and |a. 
M from L1:L2:L3:M3:N3=0.69:0.21:1.00:0.39:0.17 (1960Ne03), K:L1:L2:L3=0.62:0.59:0.126:1.0 (1968Ha39), K:L1:L2:L3=0.7:0.6:0.15:1.0 (1970Ak01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.63 {I10} assuming adopted decay scheme normalization. 
M,MR L1:L2=4.4 {I7}:1.8 {I3}; sign of |d from Adopted Gammas. |a(L1)exp=0.72 {I15} implies |d=0.3 {I+4-3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
E isomeric transition populated primarily directly in the reaction. 
M K:L1:L2:L3:M=6.1 {I9}:6.0 {I9}:1.20 {I18}:9.1 {I14}:6.1 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
%I|g=5.3 {I6} assuming adopted decay scheme normalization. 
M L1:L2:L3:M:N+=24 {I4}:61 {I9}:52 {I8}:35 {I5}:9.7 {I15}; |a(L2)exp=1.13 {I24}. 
MR from |a(L2)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
TI $calculated from the intensity balance at the 273 level assuming no direct |e feeding to that level. Authors estimated I(|g+ce)|?60 from coincidence intensities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.37 {I25} assuming adopted decay scheme normalization. 
M from L1:L2:L3:M:N+=2.1 {I3}:17.0 {I26}:16.0 {I24}:9.9 {I15}:7.5 {I11}; |a(L)exp=2.5 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI implied branching is very much larger than adopted value; |g is probably a doublet, the second component being the known 25/2+ to 23/2+ transition from the 1442 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M DCO(1)=0.44 {I4}; DCO(2)=0.24 {I3}. Presumably for a doublet since identical DCO(1) and DCO(2) values are reported for the 187.3|g and the 186.8|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M DCO(1)=0.44 {I4}; DCO(2)=0.24 {I3}. Presumably for a doublet; see comment on 187|g from 951 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI uncertainty of 0 in 2001Sh41 seems to be a misprint; it should presumably be 1 as for other transitions of comparable intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.47 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1975Ja12). A{-2}=-0.47 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.24 {I3} (1973Li21). 
Measured I|g=4.0 {I4} includes impurity. I|g recommended here is calculated assuming intensity balance through the 96 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1975Ja12) for contaminated line. A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6} (1973Li21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
The evaluator shows this transition as a doublet because the known intraband 187|g from the J=25/2 band member should have been seen in this experiment but would not have been resolved from this transition. 
M,MR A{-2}=-0.56 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6}, |d=-0.27 {I6} (1975Ja12) for presumed doublet; A{-2}=-0.49 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I8} (1973Li21) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} (1975Ja12) for contaminated line. A{-2}=-0.45 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.26 {I7} (1973Li21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI for 491.4|g+491.6|g doublet. 
M A{-2}=+0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (1975Ja12) for doublet; A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I9} (1973Li21) for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 943.5 {I2} in ({+13}C,5n|g). 
Other I|g: 133 {I10} from (p,4n|g), 112 {I9} from (|a,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E|g=1105.28 {I20} for doublet. 
Other I|g: 68 {I3} (suitably divided) from |e decay, 45 {I4} from ({+13}C,5n|g), 68 {I6} from (p,4n|g), 85 {I7} from (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 346.6 {I2} in ({+13}C,5n|g). 
Other I|g: 1.7 {I9} in ({+13}C,5n|g), 5.4 {I14} in ({+18}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 654.2 {I2} in ({+13}C,5n|g). 
Other I|g: 25.2 {I17} in ({+13}C,5n|g), 29.7 {I14} in ({+18}O,4n|g), 5.9 {I21} in (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from ({+13}C,5n|g). E|g=601.16 {I11} in |e decay for doubly-placed |g. 
RI from |e decay. I|g for doubly-placed line suitably divided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from ({+18}O,4n|g). Other I|g: 77 {I9} in |e decay, 69 {I5} in ({+13}C,5n|g), 82 {I29} in (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q from ({+18}O,4n|g), |D|p from level scheme. 
RI from ({+18}O,4n|g). Other I|g: 38.6 {I23} in ({+13}C,5n|g), 38 {I4} in |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 42 {I4} in ({+13}C,5n|g), 30.6 {I20} in ({+18}O,4n|g). 
M E1,E2 from |a(K)exp in |e decay; D from DCO in ({+18}O,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 81 {I3} from ({+18}O,4n|g), 75 {I19} in |e decay. 
M DCO=1.0 {I1} in ({+13}C,5n|g) not consistent with mult=E1 required by level scheme; |a(K)exp for doublet in |e decay rules out M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M from |e decay. |a(K)exp consistent with E1 or E2; level scheme requires |D|p=yes. DCO in ({+18}O,4n|g) consistent with D, |DJ=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 684.3 {I3} in |e decay, 683.2 {I2} in IT decay. 
M D+Q from ({+18}O,4n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 494.9 {I2} from IT decay. 
Other I|g: 27 from IT decay, 35.2 {I14} from ({+18}O,4n|g). 
M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.052 {I7} in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 55 from IT decay and 53.5 {I14} from ({+18}O,4n|g). 
M stretched Q from ({+18}O,4n|g); E2 from |a(K)exp in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E placement in ({+18}O,4n|g) differs; there, a 938.7|g feeds the J=26 member of the yrast band, not the J=24 member. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 449 {I31} (1973Ho09), 500 {I25} (1989Po09) and 477 {I9} (1994Ki01). 
%I|g=30.8 {I6}, assuming recommended decay scheme normalization. 
M from ce data of 1960Ba43 and 1989Po09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI uncertainties of 5% and 1.6% are indicated by 1989Po09 and 1994Ki01, so the evaluator assigns the smaller of these to I(264|g). 1973Ho09 show no uncertainty for this I|g, and it is unclear whether the uncertainty in their I(264|g) measurement has been propagated through their I|g data for the other transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 381 {I27} (1973Ho09), 370 {I19} (1989Po09) and 465 {I8} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 446 {I26}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.033 {I11} for 559.6|g+559.6|g doublet (1989Po09). 
E|g=559.3 {I4}, I|g=5.6 {I11} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ki01. Other I|g: 56 {I4} (1973Ho09, 60 {I15} (1989Po09); it is unclear whether these intensities include the 821.6|g (I|g=3.0 {I6}) reported in 1994Ki01 alone. 
MR from A{-2}=-0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=|+0.31 {I6} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 54 {I4} (1973Ho09), 55 {I14} (1989Po09) and 46.7 {I13} (1994Ki01); the unweighted average is 52 {I3}. The evaluator assumes I|g=5.5 in 1989Po09 is a typographical error (one order of magnitude too low); branching shown in fig. 1 of 1989Po09 supports this interpretation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 24.8 {I17} (1973Ho09), 24 {I6} (1989Po09) and 22.6 {I11} (1994Ki01). 
MR from A{-2}=+0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I6} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 183 {I13} (1973Ho09), 210 {I53} (1989Po09) and 158 {I3} (1994Ki01). The unweighted average is 184 {I15}. 
MR from A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 2.2 {I3} (1973Ho09) and 4.2 {I6} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 2.6 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Possibly part of E|g=1205.8 {I3}, I|g=3.0 {I3} doublet reported by 1973Ho09; absent in 1989Po09, so shown as doubtful here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 117 {I8} (1973Ho09), 121 {I30} (1989Po09) and 132 {I2} (1994Ki01). 
M from |g(|q); |D|p=no based on large |d. |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I15} for 839.1|g+841.3|g doublet (1989Po09) dominated by this transition. A{-2}=-0.04 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I4} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 78 {I8} (1973Ho09), 95 {I24} (1989Po09) and 91 {I4} (1994Ki01). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I14} (1989Po09) for doublet dominated by this transition. A{-2}=+0.09 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 4.0 {I3} (1973Ho09), 3.4 {I9} (1989Po09) and 5.4 {I9} (1994Ki01). 
M |a(K)exp=0.06 {I2} for 347.3|g+348.9|g doublet (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 10.9 {I8} (1973Ho09), 13 {I3} (1989Po09) and 9.4 {I6} (1994Ki01). 
M from A{-2}=-0.09 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I11} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 79 {I6} (1973Ho09), 94 {I24} (1989Po09) and 86 {I2} (1994Ki01). 
MR from A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<0.0025 for 1324|g+1326|g doublet (1989Po09). 
Other I|g: 16 {I4} in 1989Po09. Absent in 1994Ki01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
|d(M1,E2)=-21 {I8} from A{-2}=-0.10 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I8} (1994Ki01). 
RI weighted average of 13.0 {I10} (1973Ho09), 20 {I5} (1989Po09) and 15.9 {I13} (1994Ki01). 
q{+2}(E0/E2)=1.3 {I7}; X(E0/E2)=0.07 {I4} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.06 {I11} (1994Ki01). 
RI weighted average of 5.0 {I10} (1973Ho09), 11 {I3} (1989Po09) and 9.0 {I5} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 48 {I3} (1973Ho09), 51 {I13} (1989Po09) and 43.0 {I13} (1994Ki01). 
M |a(K)exp=0.055 {I15} for doublet (1989Po09) dominated by this component. 
RI 48 {I3} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI from 1994Ki01. However, far larger values are reported by 1973Ho09 (12.0 {I8}) and 1989Po09 (16 {I4}); the source of this discrepancy is not known. 
M,MR D+Q from A{-2}=-0.18 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1994Ki01); E2,E1 from |a(K)exp|<0.003. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 21.3 {I15} (1973Ho09), 21 {I5} (1989Po09) and 25.7 {I13} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 23.7 {I16}. 
M from |g(|q); |D|p=no based on large |d. |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I15} for 839.1|g+841.3|g doublet (1989Po09). 
MR from A{-2}=-0.14 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I8} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 17.9 {I13} (1973Ho09), 21 {I5} (1989Po09) and 13.7 {I13} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 16.0 {I16}. 
A{-2}=+0.11 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I8} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 30.9 {I22} (1973Ho09), 36 {I9} (1989Po09) and 33 {I2} (1994Ki01). 
MR from A{-2}=+0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 14 {I3} (1973Ho09) and 18 {I5} (1989Po09). However, transition not reported by 1994Ki01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 75 {I19} (1973Ho09), 86 {I6} (1989Po09) and 92 {I3} (1994Ki01). 
M from |a(K)exp=0.008 {I2} for 493.0|g+493.6|g doublet (1989Po09) dominated by this transition. 
E|g=493.11 {I10}, I|g=86 {I6} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 40 {I3} (1973Ho09), 41 {I10} (1989Po09) and 43 {I3} (1994Ki01). 
M,MR A{-2}=-0.05 {I5}, A{-4}=0.10 {I6} (1994Ki01); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 34.3 {I24} (1973Ho09), 41 {I10} (1989Po09) and 36 {I3} (1994Ki01). 
MR from A{-2}=0.00 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I7} (1994Ki01). 
Other I|g: 41 {I10} (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 12.0 {I10} (1994Ki01) and 9.0 {I23} (1989Po09). I|g=9.4 {I1} from 1973Ho09 appears to claim unreasonably high precision. 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 27.5 {I19} (1973Ho09), 26 {I6} (1989Po09) and 36.4 {I9} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 34.6 {I25}. 
1989Po09 give |a(K)exp=1.6 {I3} but assign mult=E2; evaluator assumes a typographical omission of exponent -1, so |a(K)exp should read 0.16 {I3} in table 3, consistent with assigned mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
See comment on 219.4|g from 1840 level. Low intensity for this branch is consistent with its absence in ({+13}C,5n|g) and ({+18}O,4n|g) studies which also excite the 1833 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 5.6 {I4} (1973Ho09), 6.0 {I15} (1989Po09) and 9.9 {I5} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 7.2 {I3}. 
M |a(K)exp=0.020 {I6} for 404.5|g+406.5|g doublet (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of data from 1973Ho09 and 1989Po09. 
RI unweighted average of 1.0 {I5} (1973Ho09), 2.4 {I6} (1989Po09) and 1.6 {I5} (1994Ki01). Weighted average is 1.6 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I(1062|g from 1836):I(1062|g from 1446)=6.4 {I13}:37 {I4} in 1973Ho09 cf. 17:11 in 1989Po09. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I14} for 1062.2|g+1062.2|g doublet (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI weighted average of 11 {I3} (1989Po09) and 10.1 {I10} (1973Ho09). This |g presumably differs from the weak 219.8|g placed from the 1833 level by 1994Ki01; those authors do not report this transition. 
M |a(K)exp=1.60 {I4} (1989Po09) for 219.4|g+220.8|g doublet dominated by this transition, but authors assign mult=E2; evaluator assumes typographical error, the intended value being |a(K)exp=0.16 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E=1066.21 {I14}, I|g=22.5 {I16} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 
M from Adopted Gammas; |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I11} for 1066.1|g+1066.5|g doublet (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E=1066.21 {I14}, I|g=22.5 {I16} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I11} for 1066.1|g+1066.5|g doublet (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<0.0013 for 1456.9|g+1458.1|g doublet (1989Po09). 
E=1457.89 {I15}, I|g=20.3 {I14} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 2.8 {I3} (1973Ho09), 2.4 {I6} (1989Po09) and 1.8 {I2} (1994Ki01). The weighted average is 2.1 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
M,MR A{-2}=-0.09 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I20} (1994Ki01); |d(M1,E2)=-7 {I3}. 
RI weighted average of 13.4 {I20} (1973Ho09) and 16 {I4} (1989Po09). 
q{+2}(E0/E2)=1.5 {I11}; X(E0/E2)=0.08 {I6} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.13 {I10} (1994Ki01). 
E weighted average from 1973Ho09 and 1989Po09. 
RI weighted average of 7.7 {I6} (1973Ho09), 9.9 {I25} (1989Po09) and 7.4 {I6} (1994Ki01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI unweighted average of 4.8 {I4} (1973Ho09) and 3.0 {I8} (1989Po09). The weighted average is 4.4 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.03 {I1} for 488.2|g+488.6|g doublet dominated by this transition (1989Po09); consistent with E1 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Probably the E|g=896.6 {I4}, I|g=2.6 {I3} line placed by 1973Ho09 from an otherwise unknown 2325 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.008 {I2} for 493.0|g+493.6|g doublet (1989Po09). 
E|g=493.11 {I10}, I|g=86 {I6} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.028 {I9} for 562.5|g+563.9|g doublet (1989Po09). 
E,RI E=563.41 {I20}, I|g=5.6 {I5} in 1973Ho09 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0044 {I13} for 778.2|g+778.2|g doublet (1989Po09) dominated by this transition. 
I|g=15.9 {I11} for doublet in 1989Po09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.033 {I11} for 559.6|g+559.6|g doublet (1989Po09) in which this is the major component. 
E|g=559.3 {I4}, I|g=5.6 {I11} for doublet in 1973Ho09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.028 {I9} for 562.5|g+563.9|g doublet (1989Po09) in which this is the major component; however placement implies E1. 
E,RI E=563.41 {I20}, I|g=5.6 {I5} I|b 1973Ho09 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I25} for 682.2|g+684.1|g doublet (1989Po09) in which this transition is the major component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E average from 1973Ho09 and 1989Po09. 
M |a(K)exp=0.010 {I4} for 726.2|g+728.6|g doublet (1989Po09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from e-mail reply from C. Wheldon to XUNDL compilers on Feb. 25, 2002; supersedes E|g=1184.9 given in Table 1 of 2002Wh01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
DCO=0.71 {I7} (not E2 gated). 
E$initial level, quoted as 8114 in table 1 of 2002Wh01, is misprinted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 460 {I37} (1973Ya05). 
M |a(L)exp=0.44 {I10} (1965Sa11); low for expected E2 transition, but ce peak area extraction may be problematic because of self absorption. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 121 {I10} (1973Ya05). 
M |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I19} (mult=E2) (1965Sa11) attributed by authors to transition between second and first 2+ levels, but their E|g=802. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=122 {I30} for 942.87|g+944.14|g doublet and I(944|g)=26 {I5}; see comment on I(944|g). 
Other I|g: 135 {I11} (1973Ya05), presumably for a doublet. 
M |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I17} (mult=E2) (1965Sa11) attributed by authors to second 2+ to g.s. transition, but their E|g=924. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=113 {I40} for the 839.1+841.33|g's and I|g=21 {I8} deduced as noted for the 839.1|g. 
Other I|g: 124 {I10} (1973Ya05), presumably for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=92 {I19} for the 1104|g+1105|g and I|g=11.6 {I27} deduced as noted for the 1103.5|g. 
Other I|g: 81 {I6} (1973Ya05), presumably for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I(493|g) and adopted I(944|g)/I(493|g)=0.46 {I3} and I|g=122 {I30} for 942.87|g+944.14|g doublet; this implies I(943|g)=96 {I30}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from I|g/I(1452|g)=2.33 {I19} in Adopted Gammas and I(1453|g) here. I|g(1062.2 doublet)=44 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E fits placement poorly. A transition with this E|g is placed from a different level in Adopted Levels, Gammas, so evaluator concludes that its placement is incorrect here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition not observed. Its existence is inferred from delayed (158.2|g) (97|g, 60|g, 37|g) coincidences in {+183}W(|a,2n|g) (1975So01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition not observed. Its existence is inferred by the 158.2|g measured in the delayed spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=3.5 {I2} 
MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3)exp=600 {I120}:90 {I18}:33 {I7}. 
RI from Ice(L1)=723 and |a(L)=14.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3)exp=250 {I50}:60 {I12}:45 {I9}. 
RI from Ice(L1)=250 {I50} and |a(L1)=3.04. I|g(60|g)/I|g(97|g)=1.65 was measured in the (|a,2n|g) reaction. This ratio and I|g(97|g) yield I|g(60|g)=99. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Delayed (158.2|g)(37.4, 60.0, 97.4 |g's) coincidences observed in {+183}W(|a,2n|g) (1975So01) imply its existence. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. A weak E2 transition to the 3/2-,1/2[510] state is expected in analogy with the decay pattern of the 7/2-,7/2[503] state in {+183}W. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from ce(K)/ce(L)exp=5.1. 
RI I|g(126.9|g+127.9|g)=21.7 {I22} was measured. I|g(127.9|g)=9.7 {I39} from Ice(K)=23 {I9} and |a(K)=2.37. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI from Ice(K)=1.2 {I5} and |a(K)=2.536 (M1 theory). 
M M1,E2 from decay scheme. Only conversion electrons were observed. An upper limit on I|g gives |a(K)exp<1.7, and |d<0.9. Evaluator adopts (M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition not observed, its existence is inferred by the 158.2|g measured in the delayed spectrum in {+183}W(|a,2n|g) (1975So01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3)exp=|?18:3.2: |?1:weak. 
RI from measured I|g(126.9|g+127.9|g)=21.7 {I22} and calculated I|g(127.9)=9.7 {I39}. I|g(126.9)=10 {I5}, from Ice(L1)=3.2 and |a(L1)=0.31. I|g(126.9)=10 {I5}, from I|g(126.9)/I|g(300.3)=1.05 {I45} in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.16 {I7} and ce(K):ce(L1)exp=0.48:weak. 
RI measured intensities of 1970FiZZ and 1971AhZX do not agree: I|g=3.0 (1970FiZZ), I|g=11.4 (1971AhZX). I|g=4.0 {I16} from Ice(K)=0.48 {I19} and |a(K)=0.119. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Its existence is inferred from delayed (158.2|g) (97|g,60|g,37|g) coincidences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Its existence is inferred by the 158.2|g measured in the delayed spectrum. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=19.9 {I21} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=1.9 {I2} 
E$100.8 from 2004Wh01 
E$level-energy difference=100.8 
M$DCO=0.51 {I3} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.46 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=17.0 {I10} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=3.6 {I4} 
E$160.9 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.95 {I4} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=120.0 {I10} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=13.6 {I14} 
M$DCO=0.47 {I1} (2004Sh08), DCO=0.37 {I1} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=220 {I7} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=24.0 {I9} 
M$DCO=0.91 {I1} (2004Sh08), DCO=0.98 {I1} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=150 {I10} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=29.9 {I10} 
M$DCO=0.47 {I1} (2004Sh08), DCO=0.39 {I1} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=64.7 {I24} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=15.2 {I5} 
E$346.6 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.98 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.21 {I8} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=33.3 {I11} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=5.4 {I2} 
E$158.9 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.38 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.49 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=130 {I5} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=26.7 {I9} 
M$DCO=0.87 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.93 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 
$277.1 and 278.4 are unresolved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=40.3 {I13} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=13.9 {I4} 
E$211.7 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.40 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.37 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=162 {I5} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=41.0 {I13} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.02 {I1} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=43.4 {I14} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=13.0 {I4} 
E$400.1 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.96 {I4} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=56.9 {I19} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=17.1 {I5} 
M$DCO=0.26 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.37 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=60.7 {I22} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=18.5 {I6} 
E$405.8 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=1.1 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.98 {I5} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=9.2 {I4} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=4.1 {I1} 
M$DCO=0.52 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.38 {I4} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=181 {I6} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=56.8 {I17} 
E$388.7 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=1.1 {I1} (2004Sh08) ; DCO=1.08 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=30.7 {I11} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=9.9 {I3} 
E$241.4 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.25 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.35 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=8.4 {I4} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=2.9 {I1} 
E$247.4 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.09 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.45 {I6} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=55.6 {I20} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=18.1 {I6} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.13 {I5} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=23.8 {I8} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=10.3 {I3} 
M$DCO=0.90 {I2} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.18 {I10} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=149 {I5} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=51.2 {I16} 
E$456.9 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.90 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.99 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=25.6 {I9} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=10.6 {I3} 
E$266.3 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.19 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.38 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=56.2 {I19} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=20.1 {I6} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.05 {I5} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=55.6 {I18} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=18.2 {I6} 
M$DCO=1.1 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.94 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=12.8 {I6} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=5.1 {I2} 
E$513.7 from 2004Wh01 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=513.4 
$DCO=0.73 {I14} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=38.4 {I13} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=12.1 {I4} 
E$519.8 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.61 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.80 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=4.9 {I3} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=2.1 {I1} 
E$237.1 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.36 {I7} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=152 {I5} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=59.7 {I18} 
M$DCO=0.96 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.98 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=19.3 {I7} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=6.1 {I2} 
E$288.2 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.32 (2004Sh08); DCO=0.36 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=52.8 {I19} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=19.0 {I6} 
M$$ DCO=1.1 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.89 {I4} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=79 {I3} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=28.3 {I9} 
M$DCO=0.94 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.94 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=107 {I3} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=34.8 {I11} 
M$DCO=1.1 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.98 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=64.3 {I21} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=20.8 {I6} 
M$DCO=0.78 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.87 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=14.6 {I6} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=6.0 {I2} 
E$308.1 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.18 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.28 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=65.1 {I22} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=19.9 {I6} 
E$596.2 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.92 {I2} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.95 {I4} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=143 {I5} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=52.8 {I16} 
M$DCO=1.1 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.09 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=174 {I5} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=66.0 {I20} 
E$uncertainty not quoted by 2004Sh08; |DE|g=0.1 keV assigned by the evaluator 
M$DCO=0.93 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.90 {I2} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=8.8 {I4} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=2.0 {I1} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} for 633.5+633.8 (2004Sh08); DCO=1.00 {I6} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=8.1 {I4} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=3.7 {I1} 
E$326.0 from 2004Wh01 
M$DCO=0.30 {I5} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=48.8 {I17} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=20.8 {I7} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} for 633.5+633.8 (2004Sh08); DCO=1.7 {I4} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=49.4 {I17} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=21.2 {I7} 
M$DCO=0.93 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.03 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=25.1 {I10} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=9.9 {I3} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.94 {I8} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=93 {I3} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=32.3 {I10} 
M$DCO=1.1 {I1} for 641.7+642.0 (2004Sh08); DCO=0.93 {I3} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=25.3 {I10} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=8.5 {I3} 
M$DCO=0.92 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=1.07 {I8} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=27.0 {I10} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=13.7 {I4} 
M$DCO=1.0 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.96 {I5} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004WhZZ)=16.0 {I7} 
$I|g(2004Sh08)=8.3 {I3} 
M$DCO=1.2 {I1} (2004Sh08); DCO=0.98 {I7} (2004WhZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004Sh08)=13.0 {I4} 
M$|a{-tot}(exp)=0.97 {I2} from intensity balance at the 3377 level (2004Sh08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g(2004Sh08)=4.4 {I1} 
M$DCO=0.43 {I1} (2004Sh08) 
E$uncertainty not quoted by 2004Sh08; 1 keV assigned by the compilers 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: +14 {I+7-3} from |g|g(|q) in {+186}Re |b{+-} decay, -16 {I+3-5} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$from {+186}Ir |e decay Others: 34~{I4} ({+14}C,4n|g), 14~{I4} in (|a,2n|g), 39~{I8} in (|a,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of data from ({+14}C,4n|g), (|a,4n|g) and {+186}Ir (16h) decays Other I|g: 11~{I3} in (|a,2n|g), 19.8~{I15} in (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Others: 100~{I13} (1.90 h |e decay), 77~{I15} (|a,2n|g), 74~{I6} (p,2n|g), 44~{I9} (|a,4n|g), 80~{I+14-9} (Coulomb excitation). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average from |e decays. Others: 6.1 {I23} (Coulomb excitation) and 7.7~{I3} (({+14}C,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from {+186}Ir |e decay (16.64 h); I|g=100 {I23} in (|a,2n|g). 
M E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp in {+186}Ir |e decay (16.64 h); |DJ=2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of data from (|a,2n|g), (p,2n|g), and {+186}Ir |e decay (16.64 h). 
RI$Other: 100 {I21} (|a,2n|g); 70 {I5} (p,2n|g); 90 {I18} (|a,4n|g); 85 {I5} ({+14}C,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of data from (|a,2n|g), (p,2n|g), and {+186}Ir |e decay (16.64 h). 
RI From ({+14}C,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$Wt. ave. of data from (|a,2n|g), (|a,4n|g), and (p,2n|g). 
RI$from ({+14}C,4n|g). Others: 12.5~{I38} (16.64 h |e decay), 26.7~{I53} (|a,4n|g), 26.4~{I24} (p,2n|g), and 16.1~{I50} (|a,2n|g). Unweighted average: 20 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|d(D,Q)=-0.044 {I15}, -0.67, +0.45, respectively, for J(2135 level)=4, 3, 5 (from |g(|q,H,t), 1982Al11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+D
decay_comment:
M from DCO ratio in (|a,4n|g) E=50,55 MeV. Likely M2(+E1) The lifetime of the state limits the M2 component to < 9%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L2:L3:M:N=4.6~{I4}:3.6~{I2}:2.7~{I1}:1.30~{I5}:0.30~{I3}, I{-tot} = 23 (1963Em02). 
E$from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
$K/L12=4~{I1}, I{-tot} = 1.2 (1963Em02). 
$Other I|g: 1.26~{I23} (1973Ho38). 
$Other |d: -10~{I+2-3} (1982Al11) from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
K:L12:L3:M:N=1.90 {I4}:0.45 {I2}:0.11 {I4}:0.14 {I1}:0.05 {I1}, I{-tot} = 8.5 (1963Em02). 
$E|g from 1972Fo22. Other I|g: 8.7~{I4} (1972Fo22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$other: 143.00~{I20} (1963Em02). 
RI$0.070~{I8} (1973Ho38). 
M$K:L1:L2:L3=40:7.5:2:|?1.8 (1964Ha06). Other: K:L2:M=1.0~{I1}:0.30~{I3}:0.7~{I3}, I{-tot} = 0.34 (1963Em02). 
$Placement from 1969Su05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
I{-tot} = 0.25 (1963Em02). 
M,MR$from |g(|q,H,t) (1982Al11) and |a(K)exp. 
$K/L12=1.9~{I7} (1963Em02). 
$Other I|g: 0.25~{I6} (1973Ho38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
$K/L12=5~{I1}, I{-tot} = 2.4 (1963Em02). 
E$from 1972Fo22. 
$Other I|g: 2.34~{I12} (1972Fo22). 
$Other |d: -87~{I+32-}|@ (1982Al11) from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
$K/L12=5~{I1}, I{-tot} = 1.8 (1963Em02). 
$Other I|g: 1.78~{I23} (1973Ho38). 
$Other |d: -19~{I+6-13} (1982Al11) from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.034~{I11} (1973Ho38) and 0.050~{I15} (1978Sp05). 
$E|g, Ice from 1964Ha06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
MR$based on |d=-29~{I+13-120} (1981Sp06). Other |d: +34~{I+26-10} (1982Al11) from |g(|q,H,t). 
$K/L12=5~{I2}, I{-tot} = 1.3 (1963Em02). 
$Other I|g: 1.33~{I17} (1973Ho38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1964Ha06. 
M$from K:L2:L3=|?3 (doublet):<2.3 (doublet):0.6 (1964Ha06). K/L3 and L2/L3 limits favor E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
$K/L12=6~{I4} (1963Em02). 
$Other |d: +16~{I+5-6} (1982Al11) from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
I{-tot} = 0.4 (1963Em02) 
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
$Other |d: +0.81~{I20} or +0.08~{I+14-11} (1978Sp05; authors favor the larger option). |a(K)exp exceeds |a(K)(M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp (1978Sp05), supported by mult=D from |g anisotropy (1978Sp05). Other |a(K)exp: 0.0061~{I15} (1974Ya03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
EKC$0.0060 for doubly-placed |g. Other |a(K)exp: 1974Ya03. 
EKC=0.0063 16 OR 0.0038 10 (1974Ya03 AND 1963Em02, 1964Ha06 RESP). 
M$D from anisotropy (1982Al11), E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp (for doublet). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
I{-tot} = 0.86 (1963Em02) 
$Other I|g: 0.79~{I9} (1973Ho38). 
$Other |d: +14~{I+7-4} (1982Al11) from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L12:M=0.3~{I1}:0.08~{I2}:0.04~{I2}, I{-tot} = 0.76 (1963Em02). 
$Other I|g: 0.80~{I8} (1973Ho38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
E$from 1969Su05. 
$|a(K)exp based on Ice from 1964Ha06 
MR$+75~{I+165-33} (1981Sp06). Other |d: +13.0~{I+25-23} (1982Al11), >+15.2 (1978Sp05) from |g(|q,H,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$D from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1978Sp05), |D|p=yes from level scheme. Inconsistent |a(K)exp|?0.007 (fig. 3, 1978Sp05) is attributed by authors to possible contamination from neighboring isotope; earlier |a(K)exp datum (0.0092) is assumed by the evaluators to have been similarly contaminated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp consistent with E2, but 706|g(|q,H,t) rules out pure E2. 
MR$-10~{I+2-9} or -10~{I+7-}|@, respectively, for J(1776 level)=4 or 5 (1982Al11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.035, K/L12=3.7~{I14}, E|g (1963Em02) are for triplet in which this transition is the major component. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
I{-tot} = 0.3 (1963Em02) 
M$from |g(|q) for oriented nuclei (1981Sp06) and |a(K)exp. 
MR$from |d=-0.1 to +0.8 (1981Sp06). Other |d: +0.80~{I20} or -0.12~{I+14-10} (1978Sp05; authors favor the larger option); +0.7~{I+8-3} (1982Al11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1978Sp05; E=846.6 for unplaced |g in 1973Ho38, but I|g=1.64~{I11} for that |g, suggesting different identity or typographical error in I|g. Not reported in 1969Su05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Ho38. May be the same |g as the 701.2~{I6} |g in 1969Su05; however, I|g=0.30~{I8} for that |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$1978Sp05 estimate |d(D,Q)=-0.3~{I1} (|a(K)=0.0063~{I2}) or -2.0~{I4} (|a(K)=0.0037~{I3}) from |g(|q); |a(K)exp favors the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=0.51~{I6} (1973Ho38) so |a(K)exp=0.0020, mult=E2 (fig. 3, 1978Sp05) for doublet dominated by this transition. 
K/L12=3 {I2} (1963Em02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$anisotropy suggests significant D component (1978Sp05). |d from |g(|q,H,t) (1982Al11). 
K/L12 |? 4 (1963Em02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|d(D,Q)=-0.044~{I15}, -0.67, +0.45, respectively, for J(2135 level)=4, 3, 5 (from |g(|q,H,t), 1982Al11). 
K/L12 |? 3 (1963Em02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g from 1969Su05. E|g=446.3 and 447.0 reported in 1964Ha06, but |g|g coin data of 1978Sp05 give no evidence for existence of a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp|?0.0038 in fig. 3 of 1978Sp05 and |g(|q,H,t) (1982Al11). |d(D,Q)=-0.07~{I3} if J(2377 level)=6 (1982Al11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Ice from 1964Ha06. Transition may include a contribution from {+185}Ir and/or {+188}Ir; nevertheless, |a(K)exp suggests presence of E0 component in transition (1973Ho38). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$also consistent with a 3269 to 912 transition, but that placement is not consistent with observed (1978Sp05) 2357|g-435|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From 1969Ca19. Other: 101 {I+15-3} (1996Wu07 - from E2 transition matrix elements). 
MR From <2+(137) M(E2) 2+(767)> =+0.897 {I+64-14} and <2+(137) M(M1) 2+(767)> =-0.029 {I+4-5} (1996Wu07). Other: >25 from A{-2}=- 0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.49 {I7} (1969Ca19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference; expected by 1996Wu07 (based on systematics), but not observed in this or any other reaction or decay. Not included in adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. |g not observed in any reaction or decay; not included in adopted gammas. 
RI$0.10~{I+10-3} (1996Wu07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI |DI{-|g} is +11-8. 
MR from <4+(434) M(E2) 4+(1071)> =+1.22 {I6} <4+(434) M(M1) 4+(1071)> =+0.042 {I+40-27} (1996Wu07). |g not observed in Columb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference; not observed in 1996Wu07. Not included in adopted gammas. 
RI$|DI{-|g} is +29-18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 10.12~{I42} (2016Lu16), 9.49~{I3} (2000Mi03), 9.35~{I10} (2000Wo02), 9.39~{I9} (1994Sc39), 9.45~{I8} (1994Co02), and 9.45~{I16} (1991Co17). Others: 1991Go23, 1972Fo22, 1972Se06, 1956Po28. 
M $ K:L2:L3:N=3.4 {I5}:2.98 {I15}:2.44 {I12}:0.480 {I24} (1969La11). L1/L3=0.200 {I5}, L2/L3=1.28 {I2} (1966Er03). K/L=0.68 {I2}, K/L3=1.70 {I5} (1968Bo38). M/L=0.250 {I15} (1968Bo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.0293~{I6} (1994Sc39), 0.0295~{I6} (2000Wo02), 0.0265~{I10} (2016Lu16), 0.032~{I3} (1991Co17), 0.0262~{I8} (from 0.0254~{I8} in 1972Fo22 - assuming |DI|g=10%)), and 0.0294~{I4} (from 0.0310~{I4} in 1991Go23). 
MR from adopted gammas. From A{-2}=-0.129 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.332 {I11} for 630|g-137|g(|q) (1969Sc11), |d=+14 {I+7-3}. Other |g|g(|q): 1972Na32 (|g|g(|q) shown to be same for liquid and solid sources), 1961Bo08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.0312~{I16} (2016Lu16), 0.0327~{I6} (1994Sc39), 0.0350~{I9} (2000Wo02), 0.037~{I4} (1991Co17), 0.0295~{I6} (from 0.0286~{I6} in 1972Fo22 - - assuming |DI|g=10%), 0.0326~{I5} (from 0.0344~{I5} in 1991Go23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.039 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1978Sp05). DCO=0.98 {I8} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). 
RI $ I|g = 55 {I3} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.01 {I6} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). A{-2}=+0.246 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1978Sp05). 
RI$Other: 55 {I3} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.00 {I7} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). 
A{-2}=+0.330 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (1978Sp05). 
RI$Other: 45 {I3} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$ In 1978Sp05 from I(649.8|g+647.0|g)=34 {I7} and I(649.8|g)|?8 from coincidence. 
M $DCO=1.00 {I7} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). I|g: for doublet. A{-2}=+0.285 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} (1978Sp05) for doublet dominated by this transition. 
RI$Other: 41 {I3} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M DCO=0.98 {I6} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). I|g: for doublet. A{-2}=+0.285 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1978Sp05). 
RI$Other: 35 {I3} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.01 {I7} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1978Sp05). 
RI$Other: 26 {I4} (1993BaZD). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M DCO=1.03 {I7} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08). A{-2}=+0.20 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I12} (1978Sp05). 
RI$Other: 27 {I3} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI from I(559.4|g+558.0|g)=18 {I4} and I(558|g)=11 {I4} from coin. 
A{-2}=+0.09 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I8} (1978Sp05) for doublet. 
RI$Other: 19 {I2} (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |DJ|=2 favored by DCO values of 1.7 {I3} (662.7|g gate), |>2 (747.5|g gate), 1.3 {I1} (494.5 gate) (1993BaZC). However, |DJ=2 for this transition in adopted gammas. Reason for discrepancy unknown. 
E,RI $ E|g, I|g from (1993BaZD). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M |DJ=1 from DCO=0.34 {I8} (1997Ba08). 
MR -1.5 {I+5-13} or -0.62 {I+18-38} from DCO ratio (1997Ba08). 
E,RI From 1997Ba08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
E,RI From (1997Ba08). 
M DCO=0.87 {I6} (1997Ba08). 
MR +5.7 {I+38-15} or +0.24 {I6} if |DJ=1, -0.67 {I+18-20} or +1.6 {I+6-7} if |DJ=0, but |DJ=2 also possible; from DCO ratio (1997Ba08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M DCO=0.80 {I8} (494.5|g gate) (1997Ba08); D component possible. 
E,RI From (1997Ba08). 
|d(D,Q)=+10 {I+47-5} or +0.16 {I8} if |DJ=1, -0.9 {I+3-5} or +2.2 {I+23-7} if |DJ=0, but |DJ=2 also possible; from DCO ratio (1997Ba08). |DJ=2 in adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
CC From {+187}Ir |e decay. Deduced by the evaluator from N{-|g}+ N{-cc}=10,700 and N{-|g}=1000, calculated intensities in 1962Ha24. E|g close to {+187}Os K-shell binding energy; total |a from sub-shells except K using Bricc (2008Ki07) yields 2.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M M1:M2:M3=1680 {I504}:154 {I48}:<34 (1971Ma24). 
RI$adjusted for |b feeding to the 9.8 level by the evaluator. The value derived from ce data of 1962Ha24 is I|g=9 {I3}. That value is presumed to be low in analogy with the value derived for the 25.6-keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3=94 {I14}:15 {I3}:6.7 {I14} (1971Ma24), L1:L2:L3=118:19:12 (1962Ha24). 
RI$adjusted for |b feeding to the 9.8 level. I|g=25 (1971Ma24) and I|g=51 (1962Ha24), both deduced from ce and |a data. See comment on |b feeding at the 9.8 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3=125 {I19}:11 {I3}:<9.6 (1971Ma24), L1:L2:L3:M:N=216:23:7:55:14 (1962Ha24). 
CC$deduced by the evaluator from N{-|g}+N{-cc}=10,700 and N{-|g}=1000, calculated intensities in 1962Ha24. E|g close to {+187}Os K-shell binding energy; total |a from sub-shells except K using Bricc (2008Ki07) yields 2.4. 
RI$adjusted for |b feeding to the 9.8 level. I|g=146 (1962Ha24) and I|g=50 (1971Ma24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3=25 {I8}:427 {I38}:480 (1971Ma24), L1:L2:L3:M:N=|?14:562:562:288:78 (1962Ha24). 
RI$from 1962Ha24. Other: I|g=30 (1971Ma24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3=<7.2:142 {I36}:158 {I14} (1971Ma24), L2:L3:M:N=|?245:236:130:35 (1962Ha24) 
RI$from 1962Ha24. Other value: I|g=21 (1971Ma24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1:M2:M3=360 {I38}:36 {I11}:<14 (1971Ma24), L1:L2:L3:M:N=245:36:7:91:27 (1962Ha24). 
RI$calculated by the evaluator assuming intensity balance through the 100.4 level. I|g=8.8 (1962Ha24) and I|g=22 (1971Ma24). The latter value gives large |b feeding to the 100.4 level and is rejected by the evaluator. The former value does not balance feeding through the 100.4 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from ce(K)=20 {I12} by the evaluator. In 1971Ma24, I|g<0.3 which is inconsistent with ce measurements. 
M$K:L1:L2:L3=20 {I12}:<0.0:<3.8:<3.8 (1971Ma24), ce(L1)|?7 (1962Ha24) 
MR$Estimated by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3=24 {I14}:6.2 {I14}:12.0 {I14}:8.6 {I14} (1971Ma24), K:L1:L2:L3:M=22:|?2:12:9:5 (1962Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3=139 {I14}:24.0 {I24}:6.2 {I14}:4.3 {I9} (1971Ma24), K:L1:L2:L3:M=135:23:|?5:2.7:<105 (1962Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
RI Average of 10.0 {I20} (d,2n|g) and 10.0 {I20} (p,n|g) 
M$|a(K)exp=7.2 from I(K| x ray)/I|g (1967Co20). Other measurement: |a(K)exp<4.8 (1964Br27). 
MR$from {+187}Ir |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 155.032 {I12} (1963Ma08) and 155.045 {I4} (1972Sh13), using curved-crystal spectrometer data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.040 {I9}, K/M=10 {I2} in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h). 323|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I7} (1985Ed02) (323ce)(155|g)(|q) gives A{-2}=0.085 {I37},A{-4}=0.059 {I52} (1963Ya01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 78.49 in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay (17.005 h) and 81.98 in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (1959Ki44), 0.021 (1958Ni04) and 0.034 (1956Jo05); 478|g(|q): A{-2}=0.06 {I1} (1985Ed02). A{-2}=-0.015 {I14}, A{-4}=0.288 {I21} (1971Kr01). (478|g)(155ce)(|q): A{-2}=-0.018 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.186 {I17} (1963Ya01). (478ce)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.033 {I11}, A{-4}=0.000 {I14} (1963Ya01). K/L/M=1/0.26/0.08 (1964Ha06). |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3}. L1/L2=2.4 {I4} (1962Gr02). |gce(|q) gives E0 strength parameter=2.2|*10{+-2} {I+8-14} and ce(K)(E0)/ce(K)(E2)=0.10 {I9} (1963Ya01,1965Ya01) 
MR$E2/M1 value is from (478|g)(155|g)(|q) in 1971Kr01. Others: -15.9 {I+14-25} from M1 and E2 matrix elements given by 1996Wu07; >30 (1969Ca19) and >17 (1971Mi08) from |g(|q) in Coul. excit. 
CC$0.031 {I4}, deduced from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (1959Ki44) and T/K=1.34 {I3} from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$ce(K)(635)/ce(K)(633)=3.55 {I10} (1962Gr02). 635|g(|q): A{-2}=0.12 {I6} (1985Ed02); |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3}. L1/L2=2.4 {I4} (1962Gr02). 
MR$from (635|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.312 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I19} (1971Kr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy differences 
RI$From I|g(24.9)/I|g(487)=2.7|*10{+-7} {I9} from B(E2)'s in Coulomb excitation (1996Wu07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I5} in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h); DCO=0.63 {I12} in (HI,xn|g) 
MR$From Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)expC=0.0047 {I5} (1966Ba29). (931|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.276 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.93 {I3} (1960Ma19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Note that DCO=0.47 {I15} in (HI,xn|g) is not consistent with the assignment from the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 59 {I5} in 1975Th06 ({+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h)) and 82 {i7} in {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.014 {I4}. Other: 824|g(|q): A{-2}=0.2 {I3} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 18.7 {I17} in 1975Th06 ({+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h)) and 16.3 {i13} in {+187}Os(n,|g) E=Th and 42 {i15} in {+188}Os(n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0037 {I4} (1966Ba29) and (673|g)(635|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.068 {I8},A{-4}=+0.017 {I18} (1960Ma19) in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay (17.005 h). |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I6} in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I3} (1966Ba29) and (829|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.295 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I20} (1960Ma19) in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay (17.005 h). |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.00044 {I22}; (829|g+824|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, 829|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.44 {I5} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I7} and 1465|g(|q): A{-2}=0.2 {I4} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay (41.5 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
TI$From %E0(K)=1.91 (1982Ka28), assuming 5% uncertainty and ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.8647 from BrIcc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$From {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+188}Ir |e decay. 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.08 {I3} in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+188}Ir |e decay. 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0102 {I25}, |a(L)exp=0.0024 {I8} in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$From {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+188}Ir |e decay. Unresolved in (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0078 {I20}, |a(L)exp=0.0012 {I4}. 1097|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.25 {I15} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.00043 {I22}. 1574|g(|q): A{-2}=0.75 {I15} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay 
MR$from |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.58 {I3} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$(1132|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.92 {I7} (1960Ma19) in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay (17.005 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
TI$From %E0(K)=0.054 (1982Ka28), assuming 5% uncertainty and ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.8648 from BrIcc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 58 {I5} in (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0087 {I20}, |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I4} in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th 
TI$From %E0(K)=0.052 (1982Ka28), assuming 5% uncertainty and ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.8649 from BrIcc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0057 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.00097 {I25}. (1210|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2} (1969Ya02), 1210|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I2} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$<0.2 for J(1941)=2 from (1308|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I9} (1960Ar01) in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=1.8|*10{+-4} {I2} (1974Be75) in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay, but |a(K)exp in {+188}Ir |e decay suggests (E1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ From (n,|g), I|g=92 {I5} 
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=2.6|*10{+-4} {I2} (1974Be75) in {+188}Re |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 73 {I7} in {+188}Ir |e decay 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0101 {I25}. 1810|g(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I20} (1985Ed02) 
CC$0.013 {I3} from |a(K)exp and ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.78. Other: |a(K)exp=0.109 {I10} (1982Ka28) in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=3.4|*10{+-4} {I5} (1974Be75). Other: I(e{++})/I(e{++},1610|g)= 0.13 {I4}; |a(pair)=2.1|*10{+-4} {I6} (1985AlZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00092 {I25}, |a(L)exp=0.00014 {I7}. Mult=E1 not completely excluded. 1944|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I7} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(exp)=13 {I1} in (HI,xn|g), from the intensity balance, but it exceeds that expected for Mult.=M1 and E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00018 {I4}; |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.327 {I15} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48) and 2050|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I4} (1985Ed02) in {+188}Ir |e decay 
MR$from |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.327 {I15} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48) in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I5}. Other: 757|g(|q): A{-2}=0.15 {I15} (1985Ed02), deduced |d=-0.2 to +0.4 or <-1.5 ({+188}Ir |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$=-0.20 {I7} from |g(|q,H,t) measurement (1980Be27), but J|p({+188}Ir g.s.)=2- was assumed, instead of 1-. Other: |d(E2/M1)=-0.2 to +0.1 or -5 to -2 (1985Ed02) 
M$|g(|q,H,t) in 1980Be27 and 2060|g(|q): A{-2}=0.01 {I5} (1985Ed02). |a(K)exp=0.0011 {I2} and |a(L)exp=0.00011 {I5} suggest Mult=E2, in conflict with the |g(|q,H,t) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3} gives mult=M1,E2. A{-2}=+0.60 {I12} in |g(|q,H,t) (1980Be27). The analysis assumed J|p=2- for {+188}Ir g.s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0005 {I1}. 
MR$from |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.297 {I19} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48). Other: -0.06 {I7} from |g(|q,H,t) study (1980Be27). (1716|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (from a graph shown by 1969Ya02), deduced |d|?+0.07. 1716|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I8} (1985Ed02), deduced |d(M2/E1)= -0.2 to +0.4 or +1 to +5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp(2193.67|g+2192.3|g)=0.00071 {I18} consistent with E1 for 2193.7|g and M1,E2 for 2192.3|g. 2194|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.4 {I2} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$measured energy shift=-420 eV {I40} (1974Ba77) and -400 eV {I40} (1968Ba36). Calculated shift of -365 eV {I45} gives isomer shift of -55 eV {I55} (1974Ba77) 
$|D<r{+2}>/<r{+2}>=-8|*10{+-5} (1968Ba36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 155.05 {I4} (1975Th06) and 155.03 {I3} (ce data,1962Gr02) 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.39 {I8}; L1/L2=0.195 (1966St01); L2/L3=1.38 {I5} (1966St01); L1/L3=0.269 {I15} (1966St01). 155|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.03 {I1} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 322.91 {I4} in 1975Th06 
M$|a(K)exp=0.040 {I9}, K/M=10 {I2}. 323|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I7} (1985Ed02) (323ce)(155|g)(|q) gives A{-2}=0.085 {I37},A{-4}=0.059 {I52} (1963Ya01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
E$477.99 {I4} in 1975Th06; 478.07 {I4} (ce data,1962Gr02) 
RI$I(E0)=0.19 {I17}, deduced from ce(K)(E0)/ce(K)(E2)=0.10 {I9} (1963Ya01) 
M$478|g(|q): A{-2}=0.06 {I1} (1985Ed02). A{-2}=-0.015 {I14}, A{-4}=0.288 {I21} (1971Kr01). (478|g)(155ce)(|q): A{-2}=-0.018 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.186 {I17} (1963Ya01). (478ce)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.033 {I11}, A{-4}=0.000 {I14} (1963Ya01). K/L/M=1/0.26/0.08 (1964Ha06). |gce(|q) gives E0 strength parameter=2.2|*10{+-2} {I+8-14} and ce(K)(E0)/ce(K)(E2)=0.10 {I9} (1963Ya01,1965Ya01) 
MR$(E2/M1) value from (478|g)(155|g)(|q) in 1971Kr01 
CC$0.031 {I4}, deduced from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (1959Ki44) and T/K=1.34 {I3} from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$633.02 {I10} in 1975Th06; 633.07 {I5} (ce data,1962Gr02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.011 {I3}, L1/L2=2.4 {I4} (1962Gr02). 633|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.27 {I2} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$312.00 {I4} (1975Th06); 311.99 {I4} (ce data,1962Gr02) 
RI$From I|g(312.00|g)/I|g(634.97|g) in the adopted gammas and and I|g(634.97|g)=34 {I5} in the {+188}Ir |e decay. Other: 1.34 {I13} in 1975Th06 
M$|a(K)exp=0.055 {I14}, K/L3=13.3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$634.91 {I15} (1975Th06); 634.96 {I5} (ce data,1962Gr02) 
M$ce(K)(635)/ce(K)(633)=3.55 {I10} (1962Gr02). 635|g(|q): A{-2}=0.12 {I6} (1985Ed02). |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3} 
MR$from (635|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.312 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I19} (1971Kr01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(175.4|g)/I|g(487.70|g) in the adopted gammas and and I|g(487.70|g)=1.44 {I15} in {+188}Ir |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$453.26 {I20} (1975Th06) 
RI$From I|g(453.34|g)/I|g(931.34|g) in the adopted gammas and I|g(931.34|g)=1.79 {I17} in the {+188}Ir |e decay. Other: 0.21 {I8} (1975Th06) 
M$|a(K)exp|?0.045. Deduced mult=M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$1304.7 {I4} (1975Th06) 
RI$1.26 {I18} (1975Th06) 
M$|a(K)exp(1302.3|g+1304.7|g)=0.0026 {I7} consistent with E2 for both, but small M1 mixture cannot be ruled out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0029 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.00044 {I22}. (829|g+824|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, 829|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.44 {I5} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(984.1|g)/I|g(829.47|g) in the adopted gammas and I|g(829.47|g)=34.9 {I25} in the {+188}Ir |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From I|g(845.05|g)/I|g(1323.04|g) in the adopted gammas and and I|g(1323.04|g)=2.75 {I22} in the {+188}Ir |e decay. Other: 1.18 {I12} (1975Th06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0023 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.00043 {I22}. 1574|g(|q): A{-2}=0.75 {I15} (1985Ed02) 
MR$from |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.58 {I3} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0057 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.00097 {I25}. (1210|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I2} (1969Ya02), 1210|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I2} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.00057 gives (E1), in conflict with (E2) from |a(pair) in {+188}Re |b{+-}. |a(K)(E2)=0.0014. 1802|g(|q): A{-2}=0.3 {I2} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2+E0
decay_comment:
RI$2.33 {I21} (1975Th06). I(E0)=0.020 {I5} (deduced from Ice data) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0101 {I25}. 1810|g(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I20} (1985Ed02) 
CC$0.013 {I3} from |a(K)exp and ce(K)/(|g+ce)=0.78 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00092 {I25}, |a(L)exp=0.00014 {I7}. Mult=E1 not completely excluded. 1944|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I7} (1985Ed02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00018 {I4}. |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.327 {I15} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48). 2050|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I4} (1985Ed02) 
MR$from |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.327 {I15} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I5}. 757|g(|q): A{-2}=0.15 {I15} (1985Ed02), deduced |d(E2/M1)=-0.2 to +0.4 or <-1.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q,H,t) measurement (1980Be27), but J|p({+188}Ir g.s.)=2- was assumed, instead of 1-. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0011 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00011 {I5}. Deduced mult=E2, in conflict with that from |g(|q,H,t) data. 2060|g(|q): A{-2}=0.01 {I5} (1985Ed02), deduced |d(E2/M1)=-0.2 to +0.1 or -5 to -2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.00091 {I25}, |a(L)exp=0.00011 {I5}, consistent with E2 |g(|q,H,t) measurement (1980Be27), but the analysis assumed J|p({+188}Ir g.s.)=2-, instead of 1-. 2215|g(|q): A{-2}=0.67 {I2} (1985Ed02). This transition was used in NMR studies on oriented {+188}Ir nuclei to obtain J|p({+188}Ir g.s.)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Be27. 1975Th06 give 2347.3 {I4} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3} gives mult=M1,E2. A{-2}=+0.60 {I12} in |g(|q,H,t) (1980Be27). The analysis assumed J|p=2- for {+188}Ir g.s. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Be27. 1975Th06 give 1715.75 {I15} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0005 {I1}. 
MR$from |g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}=-0.297 {I19} (1992Ka49,1992Ka48). Other: -0.06 {I7} from |g(|q,H,t) study (1980Be27). (1716|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (from a graph shown by 1969Ya02), deduced |d|?+0.07. 1716|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I8} (1985Ed02), deduced |d(M2/E1)= -0.2 to +0.4 or +1 to +5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1964Ha06 report a conversion line for E|g=2525.1. If same as 2520|g, |a(K)exp=0.029 is too high to be an E2 or M1 transition. It is possible that line reported by 1964Ha06 is from an impurity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(478)/I|g(633)=0.80 {I2} from B(E2)'s of 1996Wu07 and 0.72 {I4} in 1969Ca19 
MR$from adopted gammas. Others: -15.9 {I+14-25} from M1 and E2 matrix elements given by 1996Wu07; >30 (1969Ca19), >17 (1971Mi08) from |g(|q) in |g(|q,H) in Coulomb excitation. 
CC$0.031 {I4}, deduced from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (1959Ki44) and T/K=1.34 {I3} from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from M1 and E2 matrix elements given by 1996Wu07 
$B(M1)(from 965,4+ to 478,4+)=0.0022 {I+4-11} (1996Wu07) 
$M1 matrix element (965,4+ to 478,4+)=+0.140 +14-40 (1996Wu07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by the evaluators from the B(E2) value of 1996Wu07 by assuming Mult=E2 for the |DJ=0 or 1 transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Others: 155.032 {I12} (1963Ma08), 155.04 {I20} (1963Sc05), 155.04 {I2} (1975Sv01) and 155.035 {I6} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 1450 {I19} (2001Sc23), 1437 {I12} (2000Mi03) and 1433 {I50} (1975Sv01). Other: 1535 {I19} (1984Zh08) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.345 {I10} (1962Fo15). K/L=0.840 {I25}, K/L3=2.24 {I7} (1968Bo38); L1/L3=0.266 {I6}, L2/L3=1.38 {I2} (1966Er03); M/L=0.255 {I15}, (N+O+..)/M=0.25 (1968Bo01); |a(K)exp=0.34 {I3} and K/L1/L2/L3= 219 {I11}/30 {I4}/133 {I7}/100 (1965Ma44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.58 {I3} (2001Sc23), 1.52 {I9} (2000Mi03), 1.66 {I5} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%), and 1.51 {I11} (1975Sv01) 
E$Others: 322.91 {I4} (1984Zh08) and 322.96 {I5} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_comment:
E$Others: 478.03 {I3} (1972Sh13) and 477.96 {I3} (1975Sv01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I3} (1959Ki44), 0.021 (1958Ni04) and 0.034 (1956Jo05) 
CC$0.031 {i4}, deduced from |a(K)exp=0.023 {i3} (1959Ki44) and T/K=1.34 {i3} from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 633.00 {I5} (1975Sv01) and 632.981 {I21} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 125.4 {I19} (2001Sc23), 128.7 {I13} (2000Mi03), 125 {I4} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 120 {I11} (1975Sv01) 
M$|a(K)exp(633+635)=0.025 {I3} (1974Ba50), 0.010 {I2} (1959Ki44) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$312.17 {I14} (1975Sv01) and 312.00 {I2} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.52 {I6} (2001Sc23) and 0.52 {I2} (1984Zh08) Other: 0.31 {I8} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$635.13 {I20} (1975Sv01) and 634.98 {I7} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 15.07 {I22} (2001Sc23), 14.6 {I7} (2000Mi03), 14.5 {I4} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 14 {I5} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$453.33 {I3} (1975Sv01), 453.345 {I21} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 7.62 {I11} (2001Sc23) , 7.67 {I15} (2000Mi03) and 7.71 {I23} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%). Other: 6.78 {I25} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$931.32 (1975Sv01), 931.348 {I10} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 54.5 {I7} (2001Sc23) , 55.9 {I5} (2000Mi03), 54.3 {I16} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 54.0 {I13} (1975Sv01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0047 {i5} (1966Ba29). (931|g)(155|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.276 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.93 {I3} (1960Ma19). Others: 1960Ar01, 1959Ki44 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$514.82 {I7} (1975Sv01) and 514.94 {I5} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.53 {I9} (2001Sc23) , 0.53 {I2} (1984Zh08) and 0.49 {I5} (1975Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 1.55 {I5} (1984Zh08) and 1.6 {I4} (1975Sv01). Note that I|g(1149.7|g+1151|g)=3.19 {I7} (2001Sc23) and 3.39 {I9} (2000Mi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$1304.7 {I4} (1975Sv01) and 1304.9 {I2} (1984Zh08) 
RI$Unweighted average of 0.27 {I3} (1984Zh08) and 0.52 {I8} (1975Sv01). Note that I|g(1302+1305)=0.42 {I5} (2001Sc23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From 1984Zh08. Other: 810.5 {I2} (1975Sv01) 
RI$Unweighted average of 0.109 {I7} (1984Zh08) and 0.071 {I22} (1975Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 1.552 {I15} (2001Sc23), 1.97 {I10} (2000Mi03) and 1.72 {I5} (1984Zh08). Other: 4.9 {I5} (1975Sv01), but the value is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 0.49 {I3} (1984Zh08) and 0.62 {I9} (1975Sv01). Other: I|g(1302+1305)=0.42 {I5} (2001Sc23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.87 {I3} (2001Sc23), 1.97 {I10} (2000Mi03), 1.81 {I5} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 1.91 {I13} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1984Zh08. Other: 672.51 {I3} from 1975Sv01 
RI$Weighted average of 11.10 {I16} (2001Sc23), 11.32 {I15} (2000Mi03), 10.9 {I3} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 10.6 {I4} (1975Sv01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0037 {i4} (1966Ba29). (673|g)(635|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.068 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.017 {I18} (1960Ma19). Other: 1959Ki44 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 40.0 {I5} (2001Sc23) , 42.3 {I4} (2000Mi03), 40.4 {I12} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 39.3 {I14} (1975Sv01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0025 {I3} (1966Ba29). (829|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.295 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I20} (1960Ma19). Others: 1959Ki44, 1960Ar01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.702 {I13} (2001Sc23), 0.666 {I20} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 0.69 {I5} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.308 {I20} (2001Sc23) and 1.33 {I4} (1984Zh08). Other: 0.83 {I6} (1975Sv01), but the value is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$Not observed in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay. E|g=271.56 {I5} from the least-squares fit adjustment, but the value is 5|s away from the level energy differences. The value from {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 0.063 {I16} in 1984Zh08. E|g=1096.54 {I6} from the least-squares fit adjustment, but the value is 3|s away from the level energy differences. The value from {+187}Os(n,|g) E=th is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 8.37 {I13} (2001Sc23), 8.61 {I14} (2000Mi03), 8.13 {I24} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 8.5 {I4} (1975Sv01) 
M$(1132|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.92 {I7} (1960Ma19). Others: 1959Ki44, 1960Ar01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 9.57 {I13} (2001Sc23), 9.77 {I15} (2000Mi03), 9.58 {I29} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 9.4 {I5} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.489 {I28} (2001Sc23), 1.55 {I7} (2000Mi03), 1.43 {I4} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 1.43 {I13} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.77 {I3} (2001Sc23), 1.84 {I7} (2000Mi03), 1.80 {I8} (1984Zh08) and 1.94 {I16} (1975Sv01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.376 {I19} (2001Sc23), 1.30 {I4} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 1.33 {I10} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.026 {I15} (2001Sc23), 1.01 {I3} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 1.02 {I8} (1975Sv01) 
M$(E1) from |a(pair)=4.1|*10{+-4} {I4} (1974Be75) in conflict with expected E2 from |DJ. |a(pair)=1.6|*10{+-4} {I3} (1985AlZJ) agrees with |a(pair)(theory for E2)=1.32|*10{+-4} (1979Sc31). I(e{++},1653|g+1670|g)/I(e{++},1610|g)=0.27 {I4} (1985AlZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$Not observed in {+188}Re |b{+-} decay 
TI$from adopted gammas 
$I(e{++})/I(e{++},1610|g)=0.13 {I4} (1985AlZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 0.320 {I9} (2001Sc23), 0.294 {I9} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 0.28 {I3} (1975Sv01) 
MR$Other: -0.036 {I11} (deduced by 1975Kr16 for J(1843)=1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 6.44 {I10} (2001Sc23), 6.85 {I13} (2000Mi03), 6.35 {I19} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 6.5 {I3} (1975Sv01) 
MR$<0.2 for J(1941)=2 from (1308|g)(633|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I9} (1960Ar01). Other: 1959Ki44 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.924 {I26} (2001Sc23), 1.94 {I6} (2000Mi03), 1.89 {I6} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 1.99 {I12} (1975Sv01) 
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=1.6|*10{+-4} {I3} (1974Be75) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.184 {I5} (2001Sc23), 0.181 {I5} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 0.200 {I16} (1975Sv01) 
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=3.1|*10{+-4} {I4} (1974Be75) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 7.87 {I12} (2001Sc23), 7.95 {I15} (2000Mi03), 7.76 {I23} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 7.5 {I4} (1975Sv01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 3.65 {I5} (2001Sc23), 3.74 {I13} (2000Mi03), 3.55 {I11} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 3.61 {I19} (1975Sv01) 
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=1.8|*10{+-4} {I2} (1974Be75), but |a(K)exp in {+188}Ir |e decay suggests (E1). |a(pair)(theory for E1)=4.0|*10{+-4} (1979Sc31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.455 {I20} (2001Sc23), 1.45 {I6} (2000Mi03), 1.47 {I4} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 1.51 {I11} (1975Sv01) 
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=2.6|*10{+-4} {I2} (1974Be75) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2,M1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.491 {I9} (2001Sc23), 0.490 {I15} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 0.54 {I5} (1975Sv01) 
M$E2,D from |a(pair)=3.4|*10{+-4} {I5} (1974Be75). Other: I(e{++})/I(e{++},1610|g)= 0.13 {I4}; |a(pair)=2.1|*10{+-4} {I6} (1985AlZJ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 0.147 {I4} (2001Sc23), 0.149 {I4} (1984Zh08, but uncertainty increased to 3%) and 0.169 {I16} (1975Sv01) 
M$E2,M1 from |a(pair)=2.8|*10{+-4} {I3} (1974Be75) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$|g not confirmed in (n,|g) from |g|g-coin, but its presence seems established in |b{+-} and |e decays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$the relative intensity of this transition varies widely in {+189}Re |b{+-} decay and (n,|g). The adopted intensity represents the unweighted average. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+189}Re |b{+-}. Other: 40 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal, if 498.94-keV |g ray in (n,|g) is assigned from this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+189}Re |b{+-}. Other: E|g=462.48 {I6}, a strong |g ray was unplaced in (n,|g) E=thermal (1992Br17), but tentatively assigned by evaluators from the 499 level, based on results from {+189}Re |b{+-} data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+189}Re |b{+-}. Other: E|g=498.94 {I4}, I|g=79 {I11} relative to 100 for E|g=462.48 {I6} in (n,|g) E=thermal, both unplaced in 1992Br17, but tentatively assigned by evaluators from the 499 level, based on results from {+189}Re |b{+-} data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_comment:
L1:L2:L3:M1:M3:N1:N3:O3=30:2:100:7:33:3:12:3 
M$deduced by the evaluators assuming 50% uncertainty for the conversion electron intensities. In 1960Ne04, the authors state the uncertainties are large due to a steep efficiency curve, but do not give the values. 
MR$from Adopted Gammas. Other: >0.46 from subshell ratios in 1960Ne04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This |g ray is unplaced in 1992Br17. Evaluators assign this |g ray from 599 level, based on results from {+189}Re |b{+-} decay. Moreover, its coincidence with a 219|g from 219 level in (n,|g) (1992Br17) supports this placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This |g ray is unplaced in 1992Br17. Evaluators assign this |g ray from 599 level, based on results from {+189}Re |b{+-} decay, where it is reported as the strongest transition from this level. Moreover, its coincidence with a 308|g from a 908 level in (n,|g) (1992Br17) supports this placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$As this has a lower precision than other measured |g transitions in 1997Br18, evaluators used 1 keV as the uncertainty in generating the level energies in the least squared fit calculation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Not in adopted gammas. In 1983Jh01, it is mentioned that a |g with this energy could be depopulating the 557.7 keV but this is not confirmed in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of values from |b-decay (1962Cr02) by measurement of the conversion electrons 
TI$from ce(M3)(30.8|g)/ce(L3)(69.5|g)=550 {I60}/465 {I10} measured in equilibrium. The indirect feeding into the 30.8 level is I(|g+ce)=5.6 {I4} 
MR$<0.09 from M1/M3 in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$referred from |e decay, the ratio of 0.113:59 (in |e) or 0.027:14.0 (in |b-decay) 
E$From {+189}Ir |e decay (1970Ma37). Included here for completeness 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=367 {I20}:470 {I20}:465 {I10}:52 {I20}:108 {I15}:115 {I15} 
MR$other: +0.62 {I+11-9} in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$the authors there report 0.93, however using their electron intensities, evaluators find this rounds to 0.94 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Adopted Gammas, based on (n,|g) E=thermal data. It is possible that an unplaced E|g=223.80 {I5} with I|g=0.37 {I12} corresponds to the |g ray seen in (n,|g), although energy deviation of |?1 keV seems quite large in view of quoted low uncertainties. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$1973Ho27 report a |g of 496.8 keV {I8} which may correspond to this transition, although a large mismatch makes this unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$1973Ho27 report a 275.8 {i8} which may be this transition, although the large mismatch makes this unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1979Sa18. Other value: 2.4 {I3} from 1973Ho27 is inconsistent with the spectrum of 1979Sa18 and presumably includes an impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M3=17.4 {I10}:1.8 {I30}:90 {I6}:6.0 {I15}:26 {I8}. Others: 1962Ha24, 1966Sy01 
TI$from intensity balance assuming no direct |e feeding. Other: I(|g+ce)=153 {I10} from ce(L3)(30.8|g)/I|g(69.5|g)=90 {I5}/59 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=100 {I5}:180 {I5}:169 {I5} 
$L1:L2:L3:M:N=490:830:780:570:180 (1962Ha24) 
MR$other: 0.70 {I3} from ce data in |e decay. Sign from 1968Ku17, 1968Pe09, 1972Wa24. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1=75 {I8}:8.8 {I10}:3.0 {I30}:25 {I19} 
MR$other: 0.06 {I4} from |e decay 
RI$I|g(59.0|g+59.3|g)=21 {I2}. See comment on 59.3|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(147|g)(69|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.184 {I34}, A{-4}=+0.049 {I19}; J(217)=7/2 
$K:L1:L2:L3=130: |?25: |?20: |?15 
$Intensities obtained by multiplying by a factor of 10 to compare with |g intensity from 1970Ma37 
MR$other: -1.2 {I+34-4} from |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(138|g)(95|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.123 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I9}; for |d(95)=+0.32: J(233)=1/2, |d(138)=+0.19; J(233)=3/2, |d(138)=-0.37; J(233)=5/2, |d(138)=+0.043. 
$K:L1+L2:L3=16 {I8}:2.0 {I10}:0.8 
$K,L12 from 1966Sy01 and L3 from 1962Ha24. From 1962Ha24 K=13, and L1,L2 were reported as a composite of 2 different lines and M was observed but not completely resolved. |a(K)exp calculated using intensities from 1962Ha24. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$(56|g)(219|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.075 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.031 {I30}; J(276)=3/2,7/2 and J(219)=5/2; sign of |d(56) not determined; or J(276)=5/2 and J(219)=7/2-, |d(56)=-0.09 {I4}. 
$L1:L2:M=39:5:10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
$L1 not completely resolved 
RI$from ce(L3)(59.3|g)/I|g(245|g)|?0.03 
MR$estimated from intensity balance through 216.7 level assuming no feeding to that level. 
E$note that this transition is not confirmed in (n,|g) |g|g coin measurements 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$(180|g)(95|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.087 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.066 {I63}; J(276)=1/2,3/2,5/2; |d(95|g)=+0.32 
$K/L=3.0 {I15}/2.8 {I10} 
$|a(K)exp is calculated using intensities from 1962Ha24 where K=3.2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$(206|g)(69|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.100 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.058 {I38}; J(276)=3/2,5/2,7/2 
MR$deduced assuming uncertainties for |a(K)exp and K/L to be 50% percent 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1=14:2.7: |?1.3:0.8:1 
MR$deduced assuming 50 percent uncertainty for |a(K)exp and all ratios 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other precise values: 186.718 {I2} from (n,n'|g), 186.720 {I10} from {+190}Os IT decay. 
M$also from ce data in (n,|g) E=th and Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other precise values: 361.139 {I9} from (n,n'|g), 361.121 {I14} from {+190}Os IT decay. 
M$also from ce data in (n,|g) E=th; |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$other precise values: 371.257 {I6} from (n,n'|g). 372.93 {I12} from Muonic atom is discrepant. 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Others: 74 from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-min and 3.1-h combined), 76 from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 67 from (n,|g) (E=th and E=res) 
MR$others (Coul. ex.): -8.5 {I+3-2} (1971Mi08), -11 {I+6-4} (1969Ca19), from |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 557.972 {I14} from (n,|g) E=th and 557.956 {I16} from (n,n'|g). 559.32 {I12} from Muonic atom is discrepant. 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Others: 100 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-min and 3.1-h combined), 100 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 100 {I7} from (n,|g) (E=th and E=res) 
M$also from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 198.08 {I20} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0 min) and 197.7 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 6.8 {I8} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 4.6 {I7} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 6.1 {I8} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 5.8 {I10} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 8.0 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 7.0 {I10} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 207.91 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0 min) and 208.1 {I1} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 4.2 {I6} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 3.4 {I7} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined). Others: 1.14 {I10}, 1.14 {I8}, 1.23 {I10}, 1.22 {I8} from (n,|g) (E=th and E=res) are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 569.310 {I14} from (n,|g) E=th and 569.291 {I20} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 
MR$other: |d(E2/M1)>4 from |g(|q) in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 353.84 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 27.7 {I19} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 25 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 31 {I3} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 31 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 18 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
M$from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 725.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 
M$from ce and |g|g(|q) data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay. Other: 197.7 {I2} is discrepant and inconsistent with level-energy difference 
RI$weighted average of 3.5 {I11} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 2.1 {I11} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 3.3 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 2.8 {I9} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 4.1 {I12} from (n,|g) E=th, and 4.1 {I10} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Others: 100 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, 100 {I4} from Coul. ex., 100 {I9} from (n,n'|g), 100 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 
M$also from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 407.22 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay, 407.33 {I10} are discrepant. Unweighted average of the three values is 407.36 {I10} 
RI$weighted average of 70 {I11} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 69 {I10} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 68 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 68 {I9} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 66 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, 78 {I11} from (n,n'|g), 72 {I4} from Coulomb excitation, and 70 {I10} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 
MR$other: -3.5 {I+7-19} from E2 and M1 matrix elements in Coul. ex.; >3.5 from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 768.57 {I8} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 768.68 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 768.6 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 33.8 {I14} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 43 {I3} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 38 {I3} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 44 {I4} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 38 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 38 {I3} from (n,n'|g), 31.0 {I20} from Coulomb excitation, and 35.1 {I21} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 
M$also from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Ir IT decay. Others: 502.55 {I8} from {+190}Re |b{+-} and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 502.5 {I1} from {+190}Ir |e decay (3.087 h), 502.6 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 502.4 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 6.0 {I6} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 5.6 {I6} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 5.5 {I10} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 6.0 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 36 {I3} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 39 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 38 {I4} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 35 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 207.91 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 208.1 {I1} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$unweighted average of 0.9 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 2.4 {I8} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 2.5 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 3.1 {I8} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 2.7 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, 2.0 {I4} from Coulomb excitation, and 0.9 {I3} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 407.22 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), and 407.176 {I25} from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 407.33 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 60 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 57 {I6} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 57 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 57 {I6} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 56 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, 50 {I8} from (n,n'|g), 60 {I15} from Coulomb excitation, and 57 {I6} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 
MR$other: >3.5 from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 605.14 {I7} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 605.26 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 605.2 {I1} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Others: 100 {I5} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined), 100 {I7} from (n,|g) (E=th and E=res), 100 {I8} from (n,n'|g), 100 {I13} from Coul. ex. 
M$also from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 615.39 {I15} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 615.6 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 1.18 {I7} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 2.6 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 8.1 {I16} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 2.9 {I7} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 4.8 {I11} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 4.8 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, 5.4 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 5.0 {I11} from Coulomb excitation. Others: 0.14 {I4} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Other: E|g=447.8 {I1}, I|g=100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th; I|g=100 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 656.02 {I8} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 655.8 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 655.9 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37 {I3} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 46 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 48 {I7} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 44 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 46 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th, and 53 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1195.8 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th and 1195.6 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
M$from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined). Others: 100 {I5} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 100 {I7} from (n,|g) (E=th and E=res), 100 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Other: 431.6 {I1} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 73 {I4} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 86 {I6} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 82 {I7} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 88 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, 89 {I7} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 73 {I6} from (n,n'|g), and 65 {I4} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Other: 630.9 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 79 {I9} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 91 {I9} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, and 68 {I10} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined). Others: 69 {I5} from (n,n'|g) for a doublet; 137 {I10} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 133 {I10} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 151 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 828.99 {I7} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 828.89 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th, and 828.9 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 93 {I7} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 89 {I8} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined). Others: 130 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 121 {I8} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 135 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, 135 {I11} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, and 135 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.01 {I5} from |g|g(|q) in {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 0.19 {I3} from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 839.14 {I12} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 839.0 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 839.1 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 30.5 {I12} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 34 {I3} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 34 {I3} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 36 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 40 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 38 {I4} from (n,n'|g), and 30.7 {I15} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1200.24 {I12} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 1200.0 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1199.4 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 11.8 {I6} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 22 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 13 {I5} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 21 {I7} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 19.0 {I24} from (n,n'|g), and 12.1 {I13} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1386.95 {I12} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay and {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 1387.4 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 4.1 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 5.0 {I7} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0-m and 3.1-h combined). Others: 28 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 30 {I5} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 17 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, 25 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 321.2 {I2} from (n,|g). 
RI$unweighted average of 59 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 37 {I3} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 63 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, 38 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, and 18 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 13.8 {I13} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 10 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 13.8 {I22} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 524.0 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th and 524.1 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 26.3 {I25} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 34 {I3} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 33 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 35 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, and 14 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$poor-fit, level-energy difference=680.37 
RI$unweighted average of 50 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 63 {I5} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 55 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, 62 {I6} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, and 45 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$poor-fit, level-energy difference=878.41 
RI$unweighted average of 65 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 81 {I7} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 72 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, 73 {I6} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, and 53 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 887.9 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 888.4 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g), I|g<50 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1249.2 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 1249.0 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 282.93 {I6} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 282.9 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th, and 283.080 {I16} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 64 {I5} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 61 {I12} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 68 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, and 72 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th. Others: 30 {I5} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 103 {I12} from (n,n'|g) are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 490.76 {I7} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 490.7 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 490.3 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Other: 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 690.04 {I8} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 691.0 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 690.1 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 40 {I4} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 36 {I4} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 59 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 60 {I7} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 38 {I6} from (n,n'|g). Others: 103 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th, 280 {I40} from (n,|g)=6.7 eV are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1021.0 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 1021.9 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV and 18 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$in (n,|g), the placements from 1383 and 1942 levels (1979Ca02) are considered incorrect on the basis of excitation function data in (n,n'|g) (1984KlZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 196.85 {I15} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 197.7 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Others: 100 {I11} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 100 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 380.03 {I12} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 380.1 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 380.12 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 59 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 80 {I11} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 100 {I15} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 75 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 53 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 95 {I18} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 420.63 {I12} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 420.8 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 420.71 {I18} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 48.0 {I20} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 49 {I10} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 70 {I15} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 47 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 36 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 59 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1036.05 {I20} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 1036.0 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1035.9 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 71 {I7} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 71 {I4} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 105 {I10} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 79 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th, and 100 {I9} from (n,n'|g). Other: 180 {I30} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 859.9 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 859.6 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 20 {I3} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 21.1 {I18} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 18 {I3} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 16.1 {I18} from (n,|g) E=th, and 17 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 50 {I5} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 44 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 38.8 {I25} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, and 42 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 79 {I5} from (n,n'|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV. Others: 100 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th, 100 {I12} from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,n'|g); intensity split for doublet. Others: 108-128 in (n,|g) (E=th and E=res) are probably not divided for possible doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Os IT decay (9.86 min). Other: 616.08 {I14} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) 
M$from ce data in {+190}Os IT decay (9.86 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 919.64 {I14} from (n,|g) E=th and 919.4 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 44 {I3} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 44 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 47 {I5} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 42 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 46 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 81 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th and 91 {I5} from (n,n'|g). Others: 175 {I14} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 109 {I8} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, and 177 {I14} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV seem discrepant 
M,MR$from ce data in (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 294.75 {I12} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 294.7 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 19.3 {I18} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 19.5 {I20} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), and 32 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 477.8 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 477.7 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 6 {I3} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) and 5.4 {I6} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Others: 23 {I4} in (n,n'|g) seems discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Others: 100 {I7} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h), 100 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). 
RI$unweighted average of 6.7 {I4} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) and 11.1 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 48 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 73 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 84 {I11} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 39 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.9 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 933.2 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37 {I4} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 41 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 53 {I11} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 62 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 56 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1131.2 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 1131.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 56 {I11} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 91 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 68 {I11} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 90 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th, and 84 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1141.8 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 1141.0 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 41 {I8} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 59 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 53 {I11} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 52 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 56 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$from energy of conversion line, seen in ce data only and no uncertainty given, 0.1 keV estimated by evaluators 
M,MR$from ce data in {+190}Ir |e decay (3.087 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 753.0 {I4} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 753.6 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I7} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 40 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 952.3 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 951.8 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 951.6 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+190}Ir |e. Not reported in (n,|g). Probably contributed by an impurity in (n,n'|g) since I|g=124 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 63 {I5} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 64 {I5} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 69 {I9} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 74 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th, and 51 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1637.2 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th and 1636.6 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 16 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 24.8 {I24} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1103.1 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 1103.6 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 47 {I5} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 50 {I4} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 50 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 65 {I7} from (n,n'|g). Other: 97 {I8} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1301.0 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 1300.4 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 60 {I5} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 54 {I6} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 60 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th. Others: 111 {I11} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 113 {I10} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1311.5 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 1310.6 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 47 {I5} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 75 {I8} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 54 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 32 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1672.5 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th and 1672.7 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 288.22 {I10} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 288.6 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 288.66 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 485.23 {I20} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 484.5 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 29 {I3} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) and 44 {I10} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Other: 100 {I17} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 46 {I9} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.1 h) and 29 {I4} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 740.19 {I14} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 740.3 {I3} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, and 740.1 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 948.0 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and 948.9 {I7} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV 
RI$from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d). Other: 135 {I15} in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1147.3 {I3} from {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d), 1147.3 {I4} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, and 1146.9 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 955.1 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th and 955.7 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 26 {I6} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 17.0 {I21} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 33 {I8} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 27.5 {I20} from (n,|g) E=th, and 20 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1353.0 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th and 1352.5 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement of a 1383|g with 1943 level (in (n,|g)) not supported by excitation function data in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1214.7 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th and 1214.0 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 86 {I7} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 70 {I9} from (n,|g) E=9.0 eV, 100 {I17} from (n,|g) E=10.3 eV, 77 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th, and 87 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 100 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th and 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1437.5 {I3} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0 min), 1437.0 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1436.7 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV. Others: 100 {I20} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1807.7 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th and 1808.9 {I7} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 27 {I8} from {+190}Re |b{+-} decay (3.0 min), 17 {I3} from (n,|g) E=6.7 eV, 19 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 13 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$186.58 {I+6-4} (corrected for magnetic shift; correction for nuclear polarization is negligible) 
RI$1974Wa22 quote 34 {I8} 
$Magnetic shift=-0.400 keV {I+50-25} (1974Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L2:L3=3500 {I525}:1500 {I225}:1100 {I165} (1964Ha06) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.075 {I6} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:M:N=315 {I47}:23 {I4}:7.5 {I11} (1964Ha06) 
M$1964Ha06 gives mult=E2 
MR$weighted average of -13 {I6} (1983Al15), -12 {I+3-5}, -7.5 {I+20-40} (1974He08), -8.5 {I10} (1971Kr01), -6.5 {I13} (1969Sa18), -14 {I6} (1965Ya01). Other: 1.9<|d<4.0 from K:M:N in (1964Ha06) (using BrIccMixing) 
$(371|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I3} (1974He08). Others: 1971Kr01, 1969Sa18 and 1965Ya01 (|g,ce(|q)) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.14 {I4} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=87 {I13} in 1964Ha06. 1964Ha06 gives mult=E2 
MR$from (198|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1974He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=67 {I10} in 1964Ha06 and I|g=6.7 {I9} for the doublet (1974Ya02). 1964Ha06 gives mult=E2 
MR$from (208|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I4} (1974He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:N=180 {I27}:11 {I2} (1964Ha06) 
M$1964Ha06 gives mult=E2 
MR$weighted average of -8.1 {I+13-21} (1983Al15), -11.5 {I15} (1974He08),-9.0 {I15} (1971Kr01), -14 {I14} (1965Ya01) 
$(569|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.282 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1974He08). Others: 1971Kr01, 1965Ya01 (|g,ce(|q)) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.06 {I3} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L3=74 {I11}:4.2 {I6} (1964Ha06) 
$(397|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1974He08) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.344 {I20} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:L3:M:N=330 {I50}:17.5 {I26}:23 {I4}:5.5 {I8} (1964Ha06) 
$|a(K)exp from I|g=125 {I6} for the doublet (1974Ya02) 
MR$from (407|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1974He08) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.255 {I39} for doublet (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=9 {I2} in 1964Ha06. No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.386 {I32} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=13 {I2} in 1964Ha06. No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06 
$(503|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1974He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:L3:M:N=330 {I50}:17.5 {I26}:23 {I4}:5.5 {I8} (1964Ha06) 
$|a(K)exp using I|g=125 {I6} for the doublet (1974Ya02) 
MR$from (407|g)(569|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.049 {I11}, A{-4}=0.096 {I17} (1974He08) using |d(569|g)=-11.5 
$|g(|q) (doublet): U{-2}A{-2}=0.26 {I4} (1983Al15), deduced |d=-6.5 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:M=225 {I34}:13.5 {I20} 
$(605|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4}, deduced |d(371|g)>6 (1974He08) 
$(605|g)(371|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.043 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I13}, deduced |d(371|g)=-7.5 {I+2-4} (1974He08) 
$(605|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.098 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I16} (1971Kr01) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.42 {I2} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp=0.027 {I7}, from I(ce(K))=23 {I4} in 1964Ha06 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.48 {I7}, deduced |d(M3/E2)=+0.18 {I9} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1=8.0 {I12}:1.4 {I2} (1964Ha06), deduced |a(K)exp=0.0209 {I47}. No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06 
MR$from |g(|q) (1983Al15). Other: -9 {I+3-8} (1974He08) 
$(656|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1974He08) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=0.72 {I23} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L3=55 {I8}:9.0 {I14}:2.0 {I3} (1964Ha06), deduced |a(K)exp=0.044 {I10} 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I2} from (224|g)(605|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1974He08) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.10 {I8} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp<0.008, from I(ce(K))<9 in 1964Ha06. No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.01 {I5} from (829|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1974He08). Other: +0.06 {I6} from (295|g)(829|g)(|q) (1974He08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from deduced |a(K)exp|?0.095, |a(L3)exp=0.0114 {I34}, from I(ce(K))|?15, I(L3)=1.8 {I3} (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$deduced |a(K)exp=0.0195 {I45}, from I(ce(K))=5.0 {I8} in 1964Ha06. No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:M:N=410 {I62}:44 {I7}:11 {I2} (1964Ha06) 
MR$from (197|g)(829|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1974He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$K:L=3.9 {I6}:0.90 {I14} (1964Ha06) 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.32 {I7} (1983Al15) 
$(1036|g)(361|g)(|q): 1969Ya03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L2:L3:M:N=37 {I6}:7.5 {I11}:5.0 {I8}:13 {I2} (1964Ha06) 
MR$from deduced conversion coefficients above (by evaluators using BrIccMixing). I(ce(K))>100 (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$K:L3:M:N=205 {I31}:16 {I3}:15 {I2}:3.5 {I5} (1964Ha06) 
MR$|?3 (2.3 {I+2-5} from |a(K)exp, >3 from |a(L3)exp) 
$(295|g)(829|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1974He08), deduced |d(829|g)=+0.06 {I6} 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.3945 {I4} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$K:L1:M=105 {I16}:17 {I3}:4.0 {I6} (1964Ha06)$ 
MR$from (519|g)(605|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.066 {I9}, A{-4}=0.002 {I14} (1974He08). Other: 1971Kr01 
$(519|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.102 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1974He08), deduced |d(519|g)=-0.05 {I3} 
$|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.2761 {I3} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$K:L1=8.0 {I12}:1.5 {I2} (1964Ha06) 
$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I2} from |g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.27 {I5} (1983Al15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$K:L2:L3=46 {I7}:5.5 {I8}:3.0 {I5} (1964Ha06) 
MR$from K:L2:L3 in 1964Ha06 (by evaluators using BrIccMixing) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
E$transition seen in ce data only (1964Ha06). Uncertainty estimated by evaluators 
MR$deduced from L1:L2:L3:M in 1964Ha06 by evaluators using the BrIccMixing code. 1964Ha06 give mult=M2 
$L1:L2:L3:M=1200 {I180}:270 {I41}:750 {I113}:750 {I113} (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3:M1+M2:M3=31.8 {I22}:100:70 {I5}:29.4 {I21}:22.2 {I16} 
$L2:N:O=100:12.9 {I9}:2.5 {I3} 
$|d(E2/M1)>5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(208|g complex)=2.0 {I1} 
RI$low by a factor of |?3, as compared to branching ratio from {+190}Ir |e and {+190}Re |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement not supported by results from (n,n'|g). Instead, it is placed with a 1570 level. This placement to 0+ g.s. is also unlikely because of J{+|p}(1383)=0+ from L(p,t)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
RI$high by a factor of |?3, as compared to branching from {+190}Ir |e decay 
M$from the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Implied M3 multipolarity for this transition makes this highly improbable. This |g is not included in the Adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$MK/L=1.23 {I20}; (M+N)/L=0.30 {I6} (1961Re02) 
$A{-2}=+0.330 {I15} (1957Mc43). |g(|q) is also measured but data are given by 1961Mc18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=-0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.47 {I7} (1969Ca19). Others: -8.6 {I+11-23} from E2 and M1 matrix elements (1996Wu07), -8.5 {I+3-2} from A{-2}=-0.156 {I18} (1971Mi08) 
$B(M1)=0.00029 {I+6-10} (1996Wu07), 0.00036 {I+25-16} (1971Mi08); 
$M1 matrix element (from 558,2+ to 187,2+)=-0.038 {I+4-7} (1996Wu07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(407)/I|g(371)=0.14 {I4} (1969Ca19) 
MR$from the Adopted Gammas. Other: -3.5 {I+7-19} from E2 and M1 matrix elements of 1996Wu07 
$B(M1)(925,4+ to 548,4+)=0.0022 {I+10-13} (1996Wu07) 
$M1 matrix element (from 925,4+ to 548,4+)=-0.14 {I+3-5} (1996Wu07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from total I(|g+ce) feeding to 548 level in this decay 
$Other: E|g=361.4 {I1}, I|g=74 {I15} (1969Ha44) 
$combined intensity=93 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=224.1 {I1} (1969Ha44); all I|g values in 1969Ha44 are re-normalized by the evaluators to I|g=59.0 {I24} of this |g here 
$combined intensity=61.8 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$361|g has small additional contribution from 361.9|g from {+193}Os decay (2012Kr05) 
RI$other: 95.3 {I15} (2012Kr05) 
$K:L2:L3=215 {I32}:50 {I8}:15 {I2} (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$616|g has small additional contribution from 616.8|g from {+80m}Br decay (2012Kr05) 
RI$other: 99.4 {I20} (2012Kr05) 
$K:L1=62 {I9}:13 {I2} (1964Ha06) 
$ce(L) line partially resolved (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
E$from energy of conversion lines (1964Ha06), seen in ce data only. Uncertainty is not available, but is estimated by evaluators as 0.1 keV 
MR$deduced from L1:L2:L3:M in 1964Ha06 by evaluators using the BrIccMixing code. 1964Ha06 give mult=M2 
$L1:L2:L3:M=1200 {I180}:270 {I41}:750 {I113}:750 {I113} (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g for doublet=28 {I2}. Split intensity based on branching at E(n)=1.2 MeV (1984KlZY). A{-2} is for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=2.2 {I2}. Intensity split based on branching at E(n)=1.2 MeV (1984KlZY). A{-2} is for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=10.1 {I8}. Intensity split based on branching at E(n)=1.2 MeV (1984KlZY). A{-2} is for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3+E4
decay_comment:
E From 1966Ma50. Other value: 74.37 {I2} (1966Pl02). Others: 1952Sw57, 1958Na15, 1963Pl01. 
M From ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=49.2 {I9}:10.74 {I10}:100, weighted average of 1973Lo03, 1984Se19, and 1966Pl02; see comments under the heading for detailed experimental data. 
MR From ce data of 1966Pi02 (except M2/L3, M3/L3, M45/L3), 1973Lo03, 1984Se19, and 1991Bo35 (n,|g) using the BrIccMixing code (v2.3d) (2023KiZX). Others: |d=0.07 {I1} (1966Pl02 - from %E4=0.5 {I1}); |d=0.055 {I5} (1973Lo03 from %E4=0.30 {I3}); |d=0.059 {I4} (1984Se19 - from ce(L) sub-shell ratios). 
CC From 2023KiZX using the BrIcc code (version not released yet) - consistent with the |a(exp) data in 1991Bo35 (n,|g) and 1972Ki09, compared to the calculated value in 1973Lo03 - implying nuclear penetration effect (proposed in 1973Lo03 and 1984Se19) is negligible. Others: |a(exp)=1650 {I150} (1972Ki09); |a(exp)|?1685 (1991Bo35 (n,|g) - from the reported |a(exp)=1544 {I117} (without |a(K)) + expected |a(K)|?140); |a=1370 {I40} (1973Lo03 - from |a(K)=117 {I4}, |a(L)=904 {I27}, |a(M)=267 {I8}, |a(N+..)=79 {I3}, calculated by 1973Lo03 using static conversion and dynamic correction coefficients for an M3 transition, an experimental nuclear penetration parameter |l=9.4 {I5}, and |d=0.055 {I5}). All references, except 1991Bo35, are related to this dataset. 
Others: 1952Sw57, 1963Pl01, 1970Ki03, 1971Ca11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=340 {I50}, |a(L2)exp=73 {I10}, |a(L3)exp=700 {I100}, |a(M1)exp=100 {I10}, |a(M2)exp=26 {I4}, |a(M3)exp=210 {I30}, |a(M4)exp=3.7 {I6}. Other data: |a(M5)exp=3.7 {I6}, |a(N1)exp=26 {I4}, |a(N2)exp=6.0 {I8}, |a(N3)exp=54 {I7}, |a(N4)exp=1.6 {I2}. Adopted multipolarity (M3+E4) in adopted gammas dataset is based on precise conversion electron data measured in {+191}Os(13.10 h) IT decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=3.4 {I9}, |a(L2)exp=0.43 {I11}, |a(L3)exp=0.14 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.81 {I20}, |a(M2)exp=0.13 {I3}, |a(M3)exp=0.039 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=2.3 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.52 {I15}, |a(L3)exp=0.33 {I10}, |a(M1)exp=0.50 {I15}, |a(M2)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(M3)exp=0.098 {I29}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 175.5 {I3} |g placement from 638 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.053 {I7}, |a(L1)exp=0.0043 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=0.0014 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0029 {I4}, |a(M1)exp=0.0022 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.078 {I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.010 {I1}, |a(L2)exp=0.016 {I2}, |a(L3)exp=0.0098 {I13}, |a(M1)exp=0.0035 {I5}, |a(M2)exp=0.0042 {I8}, |a(M3)exp=0.0023 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.54 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.077 {I13}, |a(L2)exp=0.063 {I11}, |a(L3)exp=0.033 {I12}, |a(M1)exp=0.039 {I11}, |a(M2)exp=0.018 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 229.8 {I3} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L1)exp=0.019 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.035 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=0.018 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 138.5 {I3} |g placement from 273 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.056 {I17}, |a(L1)exp=0.038 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 235.0 {I3} |g placement from 508 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.11 {I1}, |a(L1)exp=0.014 {I2}, |a(L2)exp=0.029 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.017 {I2}, |a(M1)exp=0.0039 {I5}, |a(M2)exp=0.0069 {I8}, |a(M3)exp=0.0052 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 291.6 {I3} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.29 {I5}, |a(L1)exp=0.042 {I11}, |a(L2)exp=0.011 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 294.9 {I3} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.26 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.032 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.010 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 353.7 {I3} |g placement from 488 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.065 {I9}, |a(L2)exp=0.0082 {I15}, |a(M1)exp=0.0027 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 315.4 {I3} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.23 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.032 {I9}, |a(M1)exp=0.018 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 442.4 {I5} |g placement from 442 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.066 {I8}, |a(L1)exp=0.0097 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 499.8 {I4} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.049 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.012 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 545.3 {I5} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.030 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.0086 {I13}. 
MR$Using |a(K)exp=0.036 {I4} only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 353.7 {I3} |g placement from 488 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.038 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.0034 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0046 {I8}, |a(M2)exp=0.0017 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|<0.5 - E1,E2 can be assumed from the limit of conversion coefficient, upper limits of the conversion-electron intensity in 1991Bo35. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|<0.03 - E1,E2 can be assumed from the limit of conversion coefficient, upper limits of the conversion-electron intensity in 1991Bo35. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 480.5 {I6} |g has an additional placement from 1202 keV level in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.048 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 386.2 {I10} |g unplaced in 1977Be15. 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.084 {I24}, |a(L1)exp=0.043 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI The 10 times greater value in 1991Bo35 published paper seems to be a typo error and was corrected here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Multiply placed. Comparable 272.754|g from this level is not in the adopted dataset. 
RI$From Fig. 1. In Table I - 13.84 {I61} from |g-|g coincidence measurements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Comparable 349.135|g placed from 433.6 keV level in adopted dataset and 345.674|g (345.75|g (1985Ni12)) from this level instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Placement of comparable 366.210|g from this level is absent in adopted dataset for this multiply placed 366.13|g in this dataset. 
RI$From Fig. 1. In Table I - 5.84 {I32} from |g-|g coincidence measurements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Possible doublet of 304.488|g (from 519.4) and 304.951 (from 619.2). 
RI$From Fig. 1. In Table I - 9.92 {I47} from |g-|g coincidence measurements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Comparable 345.674|g placed from 487.6 keV level in adopted dataset and 349.674|g (349.13|g (1985Ni12)) from this level instead. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI from |e decay; consistent with 59 {I4} from IT decay, 54 {I6} from (n,|g) E=thermal and 63 {I8} from (n,n'|g) but not with 49 {I3} from Coulomb excitation or 94 from muonic atom. 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2) (cf. 48.2 {I+22-21} assuming adopted T{-1/2}). 
Other |d: -3.2 {I+9-3} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 489.032 {I15} from (n,n'|g), 489.04 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal) and 489.06 {I3} from |e decay. 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2). 
RI from {+192}Ir |e decay (73.829 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
Other E|g: 329.09 {I15} from |e decay. 
RI unweighted average of 25.2 {I8} from |e decay, 32 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal, 31 {I4} from (n,n'|g), 26 {I6} from IT decay (5.9 s). Other I|g: 13.9 {I16} from Coulomb excitation. 
M D+Q from |g|g(|q) in |e decay; not E1+M2 from RUL. 
MR from Coulomb excitation. 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 703.78 {I19} from |e decay, 704.03 {I14} from (n,n'|g), 703.96 {I10} from IT decay (5.9 s). 
RI unweighted average of 7.7 {I10} from |e decay, 8.3 {I10} from Coulomb excitation, 9 {I3} from IT decay (59 s) and 5.7 {I7} from (n,n'|g) (the weighted average is 6.9 {I7}). 
M from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and RUL. 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2); 0.26 {I3} based on adopted T{-1/2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR +0.15 {I+4-6} or +3.3 {I+15-12} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) (1983Kl06); the first option is inconsistent with measured B(E2) from Coulomb excitation. 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); not E1+M2 from RUL. 
B(E2)(W.u.) from adopted transition properties; B(E2)(W.u.)=58 {I+8-16} from measured B(E2) in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 580.39 {I10} from (n,|g) E=thermal, 580.46 {I13} from IT decay (5.9 s) and 580.48 {I13} from (n,n'|g). 
M from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 271.584 {I13} from (n,n'|g) and 271.60 {I10} from (n,|g) E=thermal. 
Other I|g: 58 {I4} and 47 {I8} from (p,p'|g), (d,d'|g). 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 26 {I4} from (p,p'|g), (d,d'|g). 
M D from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E |g expected based on direct excitation of parent level in (e,e') and Coulomb excitation. E|g=1341.4 {I3} in (n,n'|g) presumed to be this transition. 
M E3 excitation of 1351 level in (e,e') and 1341 level in Coulomb excitation. 
B(E3)(W.u.): from measured B(E3)|^=0.131 {I9} (1988Bo08) from (e,e'). Other B(E3)|^: 0.37 {I4} from Coulomb excitation (implying B(E3)(W.u.)=24.1 {I26}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
Other I|g: 111 {I9} in {+192}Ir |e decay (73.829 d). 
M D+Q from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) for intraband |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E from IT decay (5.9 s). Other E|g: 452.42 {I12} from (n,|g) E=thermal. 
Other I|g: 100 {I57} from IT decay (5.9 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 555.75 {I16} from {+192}Os IT decay, 555.59 {I10} from (n,|g) and 555.90 {I10} from (n,n'|g). 
RI 100 {I+6-12} from Coulomb excitation. 
M from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and RUL. 
B(E2)(W.u.): from measured B(E2). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from energy difference between 2015 and 1968 levels; transition is not observed, but is required for population of 1968.0 level. 
RI deduced from I(|g+ce)=19 {I4} (from intensity balance at 1968 level) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Tentatively placed by evaluator; branch is expected because level is E3-excited in (e,e') and Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI |g tentatively placed by evaluator; see comment on 1561 level. Based on I(330|g) and adopted branching, only I(220|g)=0.34 {I3} is expected to deexcite the 910 level, leaving I|g=0.7 {I5} to be otherwise accounted for in (d,d'|g). I(220|g)/I(330|g) in (p,p'|g) is consistent with adopted branching. 
RI I(220|g):I(330|g)=1.0 {I5}:6.7 {I10} for E(p)=16 MeV (1976Ja18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I(379|g):I(580|g)=3.7 {I9}:8.8 {I12} for E(p)=16 MeV (1976Ja18). Branching data from (p,p'|g) and (d,d'|g) are discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI |DI{-|g} is +27-13. 
M1 transition matrix element: -0.093 {I+36-7} (1996Wu07). 
MR from E2 and M1 transition matrix elements (1996Wu07). Others: -3.1 {I10} (1971Mi08, from particle-|g(|q)); -4.7 {I+7-6} (1969Ro03, from beam-|g(|q) and beam-|g|g(|q)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI |DI{-|g} is +27-5. 
E from adopted level energy difference; |g is not observed and is otherwise unknown, so it is not included in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI |DI{-|g} is +16-8. 
M1 transition matrix element: -0.245 {I+33-17} (1996Wu07). 
MR from E2 and M1 transition matrix elements (1996Wu07); presumed to supersede +1.74|<|d|<+3.15 from 1980WuZW. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI |DI{-|g} is +7-13. 
M assumed by 1996Wu07 for analysis of their data. Adopted value is M1+E2 with |d=+3.3 {I+15-12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from ce subshell ratios, |g|g(|q). |a(K)exp=0.142 {I7}, K/L=1.52 {I5}, (L1+L2)/L3=2.08 {I5} (1966Sc20); L/(L+M+)=1.05 {I4} (1983Ha34); L1:L2:L3=100 {I4}:275 {I3}:183 {I3} (1964He19); L:M:N+=3.85 {I30}:1:0.27 (1968Bo01); M1/M3=0.386 {I35} (1971HeZA). 
%I|g=3.315 {I19} assuming proposed decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E revision by 1983Sh48 of datum from 1975Bo07. Others: 283.30 {I10} (1966Sc20), 283.255 {I20}(1973Ge05), 283.2 {I3} (1985Ei01), 283.34 (1988Li06, uncertainty 0.03 to 0.3). 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1975Be19). Other values: -1.6 {I+14-34} (|g|g(|q), 1974YaZK), -6 {I+1-2} (|g|g(|q) and |g linear polarization (oriented nuclei, 1985Ri13), -2.3 {I+7-13} (|g|g(|q), 1987Me14). 
|a(K)exp=0.080 {I7} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 489.05 {I7} (1966Sc20) and 489.06 {I3} (1973Ge05). Others: 489.06 {I30} (1985Ei01) and 489.05 (1988Li06, uncertainty 0.03 to 0.3). 
|a(K)exp=0.0192 {I21} (1966Sc20). 
%I|g=0.438 {I15} assuming proposed decay scheme normalization. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E revision by 1983Sh48 of datum from 1975Bo07. Others: 374.55 {I14} (1966Sc20), 374.472 {I25}(1973Ge05), 374.4 {I3} (1985Ei01), 374.52 (1988Li06, uncertainty 0.03 to 0.3). 
M from |a(L)exp and (L1+L2)/L3 subshell ratio. 
|a(L)exp=0.0116 {I6}, (L1+L2)/L3=3.8 {I2} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E unweighted average of 110.092 {I19} (1969LeZU), 110.67 {I30} (1985Ei01), 110.24 {I30} (1988Li06). 
MR from |a(K)exp. 
|a(K)exp=2.9 {I4} (Ice from 1960Ma17); K:L1:L3=7:|?3:|?2 (1964Ha06). Other |a(K)exp: <5.2 (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E revision by 1983Sh48 of datum from 1975Bo07. Others: 201.31 {I7} (1966Sc20), 201.281 {I20}(1973Ge05), 201.4 {I3} (1985Ei01), 201.39 (1988Li06, uncertainty 0.03 to 0.3). 
MR other values: -4.1 {I+12-23} (|g|g(|q), 1987Me14), -4.6 {I10} (|g|g(|q), 1975Be19), -3.6 {I+12-22} (|g|g(|q)), 1974He08); |d{+2}>3.7 (|g(|q,t), 1970Hi12); 2.8 {I+7-4} from |a(K)exp. 
|a(K)exp=0.222 {I19}, K/L=1.9 {I1}, (L1+L2)/L3=2.33 {I10} (1966Sc20); K/L=1.85 {I4}, L1:L2:L3=100:142 {I6}:89 {I7} (1957Ke01,1957Ke66). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from total I|g=3.859 {I11} for 484.6|g+485.3|g({+192}Pt) and I|g(485.3|g)=0.0023 {I5}. 
MR other data: -6.5 {I4} (|g|g(|q), 1987Me14), -5.8 {I8} (|g(|q,t), 1970Hi12), -10 {I1} (|g|g(|q, 1975Be19), -7.6 {I+11-14} (|g|g(|q), 1974He08), -5.1 {I5} (|g|g(|q), 1974YaZK), -7.6 {I+13-24} (|g|g(|q), 1970Be08), -10.9 {I+15-21} (|g|g(|q), 1969Gr19), -10 {I+3-10} (|g|g(|q), 1969Kh04), 7.4 (from |a(K)exp). 
|a(K)exp=0.0191 {I7} for doublet dominated by this transition; K/L=3.8 {I3}, (L1+L2)/L3=7.6 {I9} (1966Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 329.13 {I20} (1973Ge05), 328.8 {I3} (1985Ei01) and 329.3 {I3} (1988Li06). 
M from Adopted Gammas. D+Q from |g|g(|q) (1985Ri13). 
MR magnitude from {+192}Os Adopted Gammas; sign from |d=-7 {I+4-15} from |g|g(|q) and |g-ray linear polarization (oriented nuclei) (1985Ri13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 420.50 {I6} (1973Ge05), 420.6 {I3} (1985Ei01) and 420.6 {I3} (1988Li06). 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 703.7 {I4} (1973Ge05), 703.6 {I3} (1985Ei01) and 704.0 {I3} (1988Li06). 
M from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+193}Os(n,|g) E=thermal. Other: I|g(438)/I|g(656)=22/7 in {+192}Os({+18}O,{+16}O|g) is in severe disagreement with the value from {+193}Os(n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$a 749|g is placed by 2001Wh01 in ({+136}Xe,X|g) from a 2542 level, which is considered questionable and not adopted. 
M$|DJ=(1) from |g|g(DCO) in ({+18}O,{+16}O|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This placement is not confirmed by 2017Da06, as the 749 |g is observed in coincidence with 218|g, but not with 382|g. 2017Da06 placed this |g from a 967, J=3 or 3+ level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=218.3 {I4}, I|g=132 {I30} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=218.2 {I2}, I|g=301 {I51} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$ E|g=383.8 {I5}, I|g=40 {I15} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=383.2 {I3}, I|g=163 {I43} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$ E|g=477.6 {I4}, I|g=70 {I24} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=477.9 {I6}, I|g=68 {I40} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$ E|g=530.1 {I6}, I|g=18 {I18} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=530.4 {I3}, I|g=97 {I55} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ E|g=193.4 {I3}, I|g=83 {I20} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=193.6 {I3}, I|g=65 {I33} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=348.6 {I3}, I|g=75 {I20} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=348.9 {I2}, I|g=187 {I38} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=554.1 {I2}, I|g=50 {I20} for 0-10 s interval; E|g=553.9 {I3}, I|g=69 {I32} for 40-440 s interval 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1 transition 
$Previous placement of a 749|g from 2541, 10+ to 8+ level in 2001Wh01 is not confirmed by 2017Da06, as this |g is observed in coincidence with 218|g, but not with 382|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g placement from Fig. 2 of 2017Da06. In authors' Table I, this |g is placed from 1063 level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved transition. Energy is difference between measured energy of the (13/2+) isomer and the highest excitation energy of the newly observed |g-ray cascade (2020Wa12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$2014Jo05 expected coincidence with 467.0|g and 324.4|g for the proposed placement, but note that it did not appear possibly due to the low statistics. 
RI$Other: 22 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
242|g+243|g doublet; I|g shared between the two components. D multipolarity for one or both components of doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E fits placement very poorly; E|g is >5|s from expected value. Level energy difference is 320.7 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
242|g+243|g doublet; I|g shared between the two components. R=0.67 {I2} for doublet, implying D multipolarity for one or both components. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M not E1 from intensity balance at the 502+x level (|a(exp)>1.5 assuming intraband 267.3|g is M1) in ({+60}Ni,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI labeled as a doublet by 2007Ha45 but only one component has been placed on the level scheme. I|g=55 {I7} for doublet; authors estimate from coincidence relationships that 52% of the doublet intensity belongs with this placement leaving I|g=26 unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I|g=100 {I8} for doubly-placed |g; authors estimate from coincidence relationships that 26% of intensity belongs with this placement leaving I|g=74 for the other placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(tot)exp obtained from intensity balance 
ECC$from weighted average of 0.65 {I13}, 0.78 {I17}, 0.72 {I13}, and 0.74 {I12} obtained from different combinations of |g|g analysis (2019Gi11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=0.9 {I3} 
Depopulating level energy shown in Table (2003Ba07) as 1026.7 keV, which is a typo, it would be 926.7 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=0.42 {I12} 
E$Table in 2003Ba07 shows the transition from (15-) level at 1288.7 keV to (14-) level at 982.6 keV, which probably a mistake, instead it should be from (15-) level at 1188.7 keV to (14-) level at 882.6 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.16 {I7}, A{-4}=0.14 {I8}. DCO=0.70 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. Other: |d=0.23 {I2}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4}. DCO=0.73 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.18 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=0.02 {I8}. DCO=0.82 {I10}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.19 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.08 {I9}, A{-4}=0.03 {I10}. DCO=0.73 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.19 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 68 {I3} in 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I22}. DCO=0.71 {I9}. 
MR$|d=0.18 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 45.9 {I21} in 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.03 {I9}, A{-4}=0.15 {I11}. DCO=0.69 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.17 {I1}, assuming K=9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 123 {I14} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.16 {I7}, A{-4}=0.14 {I8}. DCO=0.70 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. Other: |d=0.23 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 37 {I4} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.03 {I11}. DCO=0.81 {I10}. 
MR$|d=0.23 {I1}, assuming K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 9.4 {I12} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.32 {I4} (1991Dr06) and 0.26 {I3} (2002OdZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 125 {I9} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I19}. DCO=0.72 {I9}. 
MR$|d=0.20 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 46 {I4} in 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.31 {I2} (1991Dr06) and 0.37 {I2} (2002OdZZ) 
M$A{-2}=0.40 {I20}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 46 {I4} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=-0.02 {I9}, A{-4}=0.29 {I11}. DCO=0.91 {I25}. 
MR$|d=0.14 {I1}, assuming K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 22.1 {I19} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.30 {I4} (1991Dr06) and 0.48 {I3} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=0.94 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 122 {I9} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4}. DCO=0.73 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.18 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 63 {I5} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.45 {I2} (1991Dr06) and 0.52 {I2} (2002OdZZ) 
M$A{-2}=0.26 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9}. DCO=0.91 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 39 {I3} in 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.68 {I5} (1991Dr06) and 0.79 {I4} (2002OdZZ) 
M$A{-2}=0.22 {I14}. DCO=0.94 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 116 {I8} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=-0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=0.02 {I8}.DCO=0.82 {I10}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.19 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 87 {I5} from 2002OdZZ, used as normalization I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.67 {I5} (1991Dr06) and 0.75 {I3} (2002OdZZ) 
M$A{-2}=0.11 {I11}. DCO=0.97 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 28 from 1991Dr06. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)= 1.03 {I7} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=0.74 {I10}. 
MR$|d=0.16 {I1}, assuming K=5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 107 {I8} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.08 {I9}, A{-4}=0.03 {I10}.DCO=0.73 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.19 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 99 {I7} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=0.92 {I7} (1991Dr06) and 0.93 {I4} (2002OdZZ) 
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I12}. DCO=0.93 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 107 {I8} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=1.01 {I4} (1991Dr06) and 1.07 {I5} (2002OdZZ) 
M$A{-2}=0.21 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I11}.DCO=0.91 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 106 {I8} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=1.62 {I8} (1991Dr06) and 1.31 {I6} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=0.99 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 66 {I5} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.17 {I22}. DCO=0.71 {I9}. 
MR$|d=0.18 {I1}, assuming K=9/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 99 {I7} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=1.72 {I9} (1991Dr06) and 1.48 {I6} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=1.18 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 94 {I7} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=2.22 {I14} (1991Dr06) and 1.73 {I8} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=1.04 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 86 {I6} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=1.67 {I13} (1991Dr06) and 1.96 {I9} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=1.05 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 72 {I5} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=2.5 {I3} (1991Dr06) and 1.89 {I9} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=0.96 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 31.5 {I22} from 2002OdZZ 
M$A{-2}=0.03 {I9}, A{-4}=0.15 {I11}.DCO=0.69 {I9}. 
MR$From |g(|q) in 1991Dr06. |d=0.17 {I1}, assuming K=9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 68 {I5} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=2.8 {I3} (1991Dr06) and 2.18 {I10} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=1.09 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 43 {I3} from 2002OdZZ. I|g(|DJ=2)/I|g(|DJ=1)=1.2 {I2} (1991Dr06) and 1.89 {I10} (2002OdZZ) 
M$DCO=1.10 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
DCO=0.70 {i6} 
Theory: |a{-|T}(E1)=0.167, |a{-|T}(M2)=15.32 
2003Ho03 calculate a hindrance factor of |>4.0x10{+4} for this transition, compared to the Weisskopf estimate. 
M From the isomeric character of the 140.5 keV level, intensity balance, and DCO ratio (2003Ho03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
This |g ray has been placed tentatively as connecting the band G bandhead to the (10-) state in band I (2003Ho03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
DCO=0.70 {i6} 
Theory: |a{-|T}(E1)=0.167, |a{-|T}(M2)=15.32 
2003Ho03 estimate a hindrance factor of |>4.0x10{+4} for this transition, compared to the Weisskopf estimate. 
M From isomeric character of the 140.5 keV level, intensity balance and DCO ratio (2003Ho03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from L2:L3=170 {I40}:150 {I30} (2000Ro41). |d(M1,E2)>3 (2000Ro41). 
I|g=13.3% {I9} assuming recommended I|g normalization. 
RI corrected for contribution from {+179}Ir. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
DCO=1.8 {I3}. 1996Ji04 note that this |g appears to have no Q component, even though the 424|g-503|g-466|g cascade which precedes it consists of Q transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=8.0 {I20} from I|g(131|g)/I|g(95.3|g)=2.3 {I6} in 156|g gated spectrum and assuming pure M1 for the 131|g 
M$from |a(exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2+E0)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.12 {I4}, inconsistent with low multipolarity, unless E0 component is present in this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.198 {I10}; |a(L)exp=0.0272 {I26}; |a(M)exp=0.0093 {I12} from delayed spectra. 
A{-2}=+0.15 {I3}. 
RI$709 {I12} from 1992Ka01; 1000 {I100} from 1990Kr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.131 {I9} for 169.0|g + 170.8|g + 171.3|g 
A{-2}=+0.01 {I3} for 170.8|g + 171.3|g 
RI$275 {I20} from 1992Ka01; 370 {I90} from 1990Kr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.036 {I3}; |a(L)exp=0.0060 {I11}. Conversion electron line corrected for 603.1 keV E2 component. 
A{-2}=-0.31 {I8}. 
RI$146 {I12} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.131 {I9} for 169.0|g + 170.8|g + 171.3|g 
A{-2}=+0.01 {I3} for 170.8|g + 171.3|g 
RI$85 {I8} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=(0.016 {I2}); |a(L)exp=(0.0042 {I2}). Gamma-ray intensity corrected for contaminant. 
A{-2}=-0.90 {I8}. 
RI$59 {I12} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.49 {I18} for 190.3|g doublet. 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I8} for 190.3|g doublet. 
RI$74 {I8} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.0099 {I13}; |a(M)exp=0.0045 {I12} for 385.0|g + 386.4|g 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I20} for 385.0|g + 385.2|g + 386.4|g 
RI$142 {I11} from 1992Ka01; 110 {I30} from 1990Kr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.58 {I4}; |a(L)exp=0.065 {I5}; |a(M)exp=0.026 {I4} for 215.1|g + 215.5|g 
RI$145 {I15} from 1992Ka01; 180 {I50} from 1990Kr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I4} for 468.8|g + 470.1|g 
A{-2}=+0.34 {I8} for 468.8|g + 470.1|g + 470.6|g 
RI$70 {I6} from 1992Ka01; 160 {I50} from 1990Kr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0055 {I11}. Conversion electron line corrected for 626.1 keV E2 component. 
A{-2}=(-0.25 {I8}) 
RI$92 {I8} from 1992Ka01; 140 {I50} from 1990Kr06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.026 {I4} for 468.8|g + 470.1|g 
A{-2}=+0.34 {I8} for 468.8|g + 470.1|g + 470.6|g 
RI$41 {I7} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.022 {I4} for 490.7|g + 490.8|g + 491.6|g 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I10} for 490.7|g + 490.8|g + 491.6|g 
RI$53 {I5} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I2}; |a(L)exp=0.0099 {I13}; |a(M)exp=0.0045 {I12} for 385.0|g + 386.4|g. 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I20} for 385.0|g + 385.2|g + 386.4|g 
RI$195 {I20} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.022 {I4} for 490.7|g + 490.8|g + 491.6|g 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I10} for 490.7|g + 490.8|g + 491.6|g 
RI$39 {I6} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.49 {I18} for 190.3|g doublet 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I8}. A{-2} and |a(K)exp are for 190.3|g + 190.3|g 
RI$46 {I5} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.58 {I4}; |a(L)exp=0.065 {I5}; |a(M)exp=0.026 {I4} for 215.1|g + 215.5|g 
A{-2}=+0.16 {I5}. 
RI$53 {I5} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.022 {I4} for 490.7|g + 490.8|g + 491.6|g 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I10} for 490.7|g + 490.8|g + 491.6|g 
RI$30 {I7} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0160 {I17} for 578.5|g + 579.4|g 
A{-2}=+0.43 {I7} for 578.5|g + 579.4|g 
RI$30 {I6} from 1992Ka01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0102 {I19} for 681.7|g +682.8|g 
$A{-2}=+0.47 {I12} for 681.3|g + 681.7|g + 682|g + 682.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
TI$from intensity balance at 88.8 level deduced by the evaluators. 2007Ho20 give 34 {I7} implying |e+|b{++} feeding which is not expected 
MR$<0.07 from L1/L2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 2000Ro41; uncertainty unstated by authors. 
TI based on |S(I(|g+ce) to 16 level)=135 {I8}. 
M from L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(N1+N2+N3)=3900 {I60}:5000 {I60}:<77:990 {I200}: 1200 {I230}:510 {I100} (2000Ro41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp(182.7+183.2)=0.9 (1988Be16). However, 1970FiZZ report |a(K)exp=5.0 {I15} for E|g=182.9 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from the intensity balance, |a(exp)=11 {I1} which is slightly lower than |a(M1 theory)=13.9. Additional, unidentified feeding could remove this difference. There is no experimental reason to exclude E1+M2; however, the systematics of odd-odd Ir levels favor |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.72 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.52 {I4}. M1+E2 is consistent with intensity balance through lower levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
Contains {+182}Os contaminant. 
M from intensity balance, |a(exp)=4.2 {I6} which is consistent with |a(M1 theory)=3.67. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I7}; consistent with D (|DJ=0) or |DJ=2 or D+Q (|DJ=1). Systematics of neighboring odd-odd Ir isotopes favor E1. Were the 287|g a |DJ=0 transition, an unobserved band member near the g.s. should exist. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=0, A{-4} consistent with 0. From the intensity balance through the 328.4 level, |a(exp)=1.4 {I9} which compares favorably with |a(M2 theory)=0.81. Any additional, unobserved population of the 328.4 level would increase |a(exp). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.61 {I8}, A{-4} consistent with 0. From intensity balance, |a(exp)=1.5 {I2} which is consistent with |a(E2 theory)=1.40. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.25 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.39 {I24}. Authors assign E2, but A{-2} and A{-4} are also consistent with D+Q. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=0.015 {I3}. 
RI I|g(355.4|g)/I|g(105.6|g)=3.6 {I4}, measured in the (|a,4n|g) reaction, gives I|g=22.5 {I33}. Thus, if 335.4|g is a doublet, 335|g deexciting the 801-keV level must be weak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.3 {I5} is consistent with E2 or with E1+M2 (|d|?0.2); however, the decay scheme requires |D|p=no. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I|g(161|g)/I|g(267|g)=0.05 from (|a,4n|g) reaction, 0.82 {I31} here, both |g's deexciting the same level. The 161-keV peak was indicated on the |g spectrum by 1979Sc20 to include |g's from {+185}Ir |e-decay. 
|a(M1)=1.614, |a(E2)=0.739. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR from |a(K)exp=0.015 {I4}. 
This |g ray was listed by 1979Sc20 as being mainly from the 70.9 min {+185}Pt decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.06 {I3}; K line was mixed with L line of another transition. Measured I|g=3.3 {I4}. 
RI authors state that >80% of intensity should be placed from 1016.7 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
I|g=11.6 {I7} from 1979An20. I(|g+ce) feeding the 2392.8 level exceeds its deexcitation. I|g value may be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
L2:L3:M1:N1|?0.103:0.017:0.41:0.10 
CC 2.32 from Bricc (Eclose to the K-shell binding energy of 76.111 keV), 13.5 FROM ICC. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
L1:L2:L3=4.5:8.5:7.7 
MR 0.57 from L1:L2:L3; |d from L1/L3 or L2/L3 differs from this value by |?0.20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$1.7, 10.6, 26 for mult=M1, E2, E1, respectively, based on I(ce(K))=7.6; M1 assumed from authors' report of a "weak" I|g. 
TI$Estimated value by evaluators for I(ce(K)) and mult=M1. <11 in 1991Be25. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$194.2 keV |g assigned as a doublet with I|g=4.5 depopulating 419.8+x and 446.6+x keV levels. Transition strength from 446.6+x level shown as strong in fig 3, while transition from 419.8+x is shown as uncertain. Therefore the evaluators assign the intensity of the 194.2 keV transition as arising mostly from de-exciting the 446.6+x level. 
K:L1:L2=2.7:0.42:0.20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$159.4 keV transition assigned as a doublet (1991Be25) depopulating 213.2+x and 237.3+x keV levels. Transition strength from both levels are shown as equally strong in fig 3. Therefore the evaluators assign the intensity of the 159.4 keV transition as split evenly between the two transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$149.8 keV |g assigned as a doublet with I|g=16 depopulating 252.6+x and 259.6+x keV levels. Transition strength from 252.6+x level shown as strong in fig 3, while transition from 259.6+x is shown as uncertain. Therefore the evaluators assign the intensity of the 149.8 keV transition as arising mostly from de-exciting the 252.6+x level. 
M M1+E2 (|d|?1.054) from |a(K)exp=0.94 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ see comment for 149 kev transition de-exciting 252.6+x level. 
M M1+E2 (|d|?1.05) from |a(K)exp=0.94 for doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. 
TI Estimated by authors (1991Be25) from coincidence spectra. Evaluators note: A 5 keV |g would not be expected to compete with other transitions de-exciting this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp significantly exceeds |a(L1)(M1), suggesting presence of E0 component or contaminant line. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$333.7 keV |g transition assigned as a doublet with I|g=4.0 depopulating 334.5+x and 444.8+x keV levels. Transition strength from 334.5+x level shown as weak in fig 3, while transition from 444.8+x is shown as uncertain. Therefore the evaluators assign the intensity of the 333.7 keV transition as arising mostly from de-exciting the 334.5+x level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ Placement from x+445 level is uncertain, also see comment for 333.7 keV |g de-exciting 334+X keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g/I|g(123)=0.68~{I14} in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV (1985Kr01). 
$E|g=117.6, A{-2}=+0.41~{I22} (1985Kr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$I|g/I|g(123)=0.50~{I10} in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV (1985Kr01). 
M$D from |g(|q). 1985Kr01 ruled out E1 based on intensity balance, but their level scheme differs from adopted. 
$E|g=78.8, A{-2}=-0.40~{I24} (1985Kr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=66.4, A{-2}=+0.20~{I26} (1985Kr01). 
$I|g:I|g(123)=645~{I130}:100 in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV (1985Kr01). 
M$based on I|g(66) (1985Kr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g/I|g(123)=0.34~{I7} in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV (1985Kr01). 
$E|g=116.9, A{-2}=-0.39~{I22} (1985Kr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$I|g/I|g(123)=0.60~{I12} in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV (1985Kr01). 
$E|g=83.9, A{-2}=-0.29~{I26} (1985Kr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$I|g/I|g(123)=0.60~{I12} in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV, E|g=165.6 (1985Kr01); there, E|g and I|g may conceivably belong to a doublet including the 167.1|g and 165.7|g reported in 1997Ca01. 
M$1985Kr01 assign M1 but give no justification. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=235.8, A{-2}=-0.06~{I5} (1985Kr01). 
M$D from |g(|q). 1985Kr01 favored M1 from intensity balance; however, their level scheme differs from adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g/I|g(123)=0.56~{I11} in (|a,3n|g) at 45~MeV (1985Kr01). 
$E|g=183.7, A{-2}=-0.30~{I22} (1985Kr01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$I|g=52~{I10}, E|g=567.5, A{-2}=+0.3~{I3} in 1985Kr01 for presumed 566.7|g+569.9|g doublet. 
M$(Q) from |g(|q) for presumed doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=470.4, A{-2}=+0.26~{I20} (1985Kr01). Note that 1985Kr01 do not report the 446.0|g which follows the 470.5|g in the scheme of 1997Ca01, so the 470.5|g of 1997Ca01 may not be the same as the 470.4|g of 1985Kr01. 
M$(Q) from |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.006 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.006 {I5} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.5 {I2} (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.708 {I17} (1992GuZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.110 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.006 {I6} 
M$|a(K)exp=2.8 {I7} (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=2.70 {I4} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N12:N3:N45:0= 19.4 {I20}:8.2 {I10}:10.4 {I10}:5.4 {I7}:2.6 {I3}:3.0 {I4}:1.7 {I5}:1.3 {I5}:0.4 {I2}:0.6 {I2} (1973Se13) 
RI$1975An08 suggest from delayed coincidence data that this intensity is too low. However, in view of the too large apparent |b feeding to this level, this result has been ignored. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI 42 {I5} (1973Se13) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.55 {I14} (mixed with 177|g K line) (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=1.25 {I7} (1992GuZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
|a(L1)exp=2.2 {I1} (1973Se13) 
RI$photon was not observed. I|g=1.5 {I4} from ce(L1) and |a(L1)=1.52, if M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI 67.2 {I11} for doublet (201.73|g + 201.38|g) (1992GuZX), intensity was divided by the evaluator based on intensity adjustment at 201 and 311 keV levels. The 201|g Branching from the 201 keV level of the adopted gammas indicates I|g|?27. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.07 (1973Se13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI 67.2 {I11} for doublet (201.73|g + 201.38|g) (1992GuZX), intensity was divided by the evaluator based on intensity adjustment at 201 and 311 keV levels. 
M$ce(K)=5.9 {I10} (1973Se13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.112 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.16 {I6} (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.149 {I3} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.160 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.035 {I15} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.24 {I7} (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.199 {I4} (1992GuZX) 
MR or -1.7 {I+4-5} (1992Gu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI 27 {I4} (1973Se13) 
A{-2}=-0.023 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I6} 
M$|a(K)exp<0.03 (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0422 {I15} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.022 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} 
M$|a(K)exp<0.012 (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0131 {I18} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI 42 {I4} (1973Se13) 
A{-2}=+0.090 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I8} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.45 {I9} (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.468 {I18} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.043 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.018 {I10} (doublet) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.27 {I5} includes unresolved E2 component; |a(L)exp=0.05 {I1} (1973Se13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.035 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I17} 
M$|a(K)exp<0.008 (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0084 {I4} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.047 {I5} (1992GuZX) -assignment M1 by 1973Se13 is inconsistent; |a(K)exp=0.2 (1973Se13). 
E$Placement from 1992Gu14. Placement from 819 level in 1973Se13 is inconsistent with a 3/2+ to 9/2+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.123 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I20} (doublet) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.442 {I8} - for doublet (1992GuZX); ce(K)=4.7 {I10}, ce(L)=1.1 {I3} (includes 245.01 ce(L)) (1973Se13). 
RI 11.3 {I2} for doublet (244.79|g+245.01|g) (1992GuZX), intensity was divided by the evaluator from intensity balance at the 486.28- and 486.39-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI 11.3 {I2} for doublet (244.79|g+245.01|g) (1992GuZX), intensity was divided by the evaluator from intensity balance at the 486.28- and 486.39-keV levels. 
A{-2}=+0.123 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I20} (doublet) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.442 {I8} - doublet (1992GuZX); ce(K)=3.4 {I1} (1973Se13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.035 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.002 {I7} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.057 {I16} (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0579 {I8} (1992GuZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|d=+1.2 {I+9-6}, was determined by the relative method for |g-rays in competition with the pure E2 transition (1992Gu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.054 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.1396 {I24} (1992GuZX); |a(K)exp=0.15 (1973Se13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI 14.4 {I3} (1992GuZX), intensity was divided by the evaluator from intensity balance at the 311- and 388-keV levels. 
M$|a(K)exp=0.06 (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0552 {I13} for doublet (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.138 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I10} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0295 {I5} (1992GuZX); |a(K)exp=0.045 (1973Se13); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.360 {I21}, A{-4}=0 (assumed) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.024 (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0162 {I4} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.199 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I12} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.015 (1973Se13); |a(K)exp=0.0131 {I4} (1992GuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$507.31|g was multiply placed from 819- and 896-keV levels in 1992Gu14. 
RI 14.4 {I3} (1992GuZX), intensity was divided by the evaluator from intensity balance at the 311- and 388-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I4} (1992GuZX); A{-2}=+0.014 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} 
Placement from 1992GuZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI 20 {I3} (1973Se13) 
A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0042 {I2} (1992GuZX); |a(K)exp=0.003 (1973Se13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Placement is from 1992GuZX. In 1973Se13, 861.1|g is unplaced and I|g=11 {I2}. 
|a(K)exp=0.0063 {I5} - E2(+M1) (1992GuZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC Normalized to theoretical value (1975Ke06) 
ce(K)=5.0 (1975Ke06); A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1975An08); A{-2}=+0.04 {I3} and 0.12 {I10} (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Includes contribution from {+185}Re(|a,|a'){+185}Re (1975An08) 
A{-2}=+0.0 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I7} (1975An08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I8} (1975An08); A{-2}=-0.09 {I11} (1975Ke06) 
M from |a(K)exp=0.067, normalized to theory (1975Ke06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.18 (1975Ke06); A{-2}=+0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1975An08); A{-2}=0.08 {I2} and 0.07 {I2} (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.26 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I2} (1975An08); A{-2}=+0.10 {I18} and 0.07 {I4} for doublet (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.029 (1975Ke06); A{-2}=-0.73 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I7} (1975An08); A{-2}=-0.79 {I2} and -0.69 {I5} (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.24 (1975Ke06), A{-2}=+0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.17 {I7} (1975An08); A{-2}=+0.16 {I5} and +0.19 {I5} (1975Ke06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.021 (1975Ke06); A{-2}=-0.8 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.4 {I4} (1975An08); A{-2}=-0.98 {I6} -0.99 {I5} (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.14 for doublet (1975Ke06); A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} (1975An08); A{-2}=-0.10 {I5} for doublet (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E 1978Ya06 predicts that 364.0|g from (19/2-) to (15/2-) is a K forbidden transition and set I|g=2 (upper limit) relative to I|g=29 of 558.8|g. This |g-ray is not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1975An08 place a 640.4|g from this level (1904 keV? in 1975An08) and 636.7|g (1975An08) without placement. 636.0|g is from this level in 1975Ke06. Average of 636.7|g and 636.0|g is reported here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E Placed only by 1975Ke06 based on coincidence data 
A{-2}=+0.10 {I18} and +0.07 {I4} for doublet (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ The placement of this |g or its energy may be suspect. It is shown only in table I of 2010Mo09, not their level-scheme figures 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$ only a weak component belongs with the decay of 4672 level, main placement is from 3281, 35/2- level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ J|p for initial level is from level-scheme figure 7 in 2010Mo09, (45/2)- in table II seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp=12.7, L1/L2/L3=39/100/100 (1963Pr12) and L1/L2=0.27 {I6}, L1/L3=0.29 {I6} (1962Ca27) in {+188}Pt |e decay (10.2 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.89, K/L=6.55 {I7}, L/M=3.47 {I3} (1962Ca27). Other: K/L1/L2/L3/M/N=1.0/0.17/0.01/0.002/0.043/0.01 (1964Sa30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L)exp=0.4 {I1} in {+187}Re(|a,3n|g) gives mult=E2,M1, but intensity balance favors E2. 1981RoZY quote mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$unresolved from 97.2|g. I|g(96.8|g) deduced from branching ratio in {+188}Pt |e decay. Total I|g for the doublet=9.1 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(L)exp=12.7, L1/L2/L3=39/100/100 (1963Pr12) and L1/L2=0.27 {I6}, L1/L3=0.29 {I6} (1962Ca27). 
RI$Note that I|g=1.6 {I8} in 1968Ha23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.89, K/L=6.55 {I7}, L/M=3.47 {I3} (1962Ca27). Other: K/L1/L2/L3/M/N=1.0/0.17/0.01/0.002/0.043/0.01 (1964Sa30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q), |DJ|p suggests (M1+E2) 
MR$negative sign from parametric plots of A{-2} from ce(|q) and |g(|q) (1983Fa11). Value not given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$in 1967Co20, this was assumed to be M2, although a strong K|a x-ray obscured the transition so the analysis was not possible. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$in 1967Co20, M2 was obtained by comparing the ratio of x-ray intensity to that of the isomeric transition. Subsequent electron conversion measurements from electron capture establish E3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=2.5 {I11}, using the calculated normalization. 
M$from |a(exp)=2.2 {I11} (deduced from intensity balance at 2108 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$%I|g=2.89 {I28} 
$K:L2:L3=86 {I7}:7.0 {I7}:4.9 {I5} 
CC$other values: K:L1:L2:L3=110 {I10}:<60:15 {I5}:14 {I5} (1964Le07) 
$K:L1:L2:L3::>92:|?33:11:7 (1962Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$negative sign from parametric plots of A{-2} from ce(|q) and |g(|q) (1983Fa11) in {+192}Os(d,xn) reaction 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M=15.8 {I12}:2.2 {I3}:0.54 {I11}:0.37 {I10}:0.83 {I9} (1972Ba21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=41 {I4}:<6:13.8 {I14} (1972Ba21); L1:L2:L3:M12=100:11:38:90 (1964Le07); L1:L2:L3=50:10:16 (1962Ha24) 
RI$from I(ce(L1) 71|g)/I(721|g)=41 {I3}/100 {I4} 
MR$from L1/L3 in 1972Ba21 and L1/L2 (with 20% uncertainty) in 1964Le07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L1:L2:L3=8.1 {I6}:1.1 {I3}:2.2 {I4}:1.5 {I3} 
$K:L12:L3=160 {I20}:75 {I20}:42 {I13} (1964Le07) 
$K:L2:L3=100:70:17 (1962Ha24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$%I|g=1.35 {I13} 
MR$if J=3/2, A{-2}U{-2}=-0.03 {I7} is consistent only with |d<0.4. The isotropic distribution of this |g ray favors J=1/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$Supported by parity change and |a(K)exp, although |a(K)exp does not exclude E2 
RI$I|g(doublet)=1.14 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$main intensity of this |g belongs to the decay of 959 level, decay from a tentative level at 1610 is uncertain 
RI$I|g(doublet)=0.64 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp does not exclude E1, but additional argument for E2 comes from log| {Ift} support for J|p assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$%I|g=0.065 {I10} 
M$|a(K)exp does not exclude E1, but additional argument for E2 comes from log| {Ift} support for J|p assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2+E0
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
CC$from |a(K)exp, with |?30% added for higher shells 
M$|a(K)exp consistent with pure M1 (|a(K)(M1)=0.010) within 1.5|s or with E2+E0 (|a(K)(E2)=0.0042) with large E0 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=94.3 (1975An08), possibly mixed with (|a,3n|g) channel 
$E|g=94.3, I|g=22.0 in (p,n|g), 2.6 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=113.8 (1975An08), mixed with (|a,3n|g) channel 
$E|g=113.7, I|g=50.0 in (p,n|g), 38.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=82.3 (1975An08), mixed with (|a,3n|g) channel 
$E|g=82.2, I|g=11.7 in (p,n|g), 1.1 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=2.9 in (p,n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$In 1975An08, a 177|g, seen only in |g|g-coin data, is tentatively placed from a 2096 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$negative sign from parametric plots of A{-2} from ce(|q) and |g(|q) (1983Fa11) 
$E|g=186.7 (1975An08), placed also tentatively from a 1482 level 
$E|g=186.6, I|g=66.7 in (p,n|g), 61.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>4 
$The ce(K) for 300.3 transition used for normalization of other ce data 
$E|g=300.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=300.3, I|g=100 in (p,n|g), 100 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=141.2, I|g=4.7 {I6} (1975An08), but mixed with contribution from 3n channel 
$E|g=141.0, I|g=12.0 in (p,n|g), 2.5 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=223.5 (1975An08), placed tentatively also from a 688 level 
$E|g=223.2, I|g=5.0 in (p,n|g), 1.1 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$The ce(L) for 258.3 transition used for normalization of other ce data 
M$|a(L)exp gives |d(M4/E3)<0.1 
$E|g=258.4 (1975An08) 
$E|g=258.2, I|g=5.0 in (p,n|g), 5.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>3.5 
$E|g=340.3 (1975An08) 
$E|g=340.1, I|g=33.3 in (p,n|g), 33.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp for 349+351 doublet 
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.8 
$E|g=351.0 (1975An08) 
$E|g=350.8, I|g=14.3 in (p,n|g), 5.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Note that 110.1 {I3} and 110.1 {I6} |g rays, the latter from tentative 949 level are not resolved, however, based on results from 1975An08, most of the intensity of the 110|g belongs from the decay of 564 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.2 
$E|g=263.2 (1975An08) 
$E|g=263.1, I|g=27.7 in (p,n|g), 35.0 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=243.5 (1975An08), 243.3 (1978Ya06) 
$E|g=243.4, I|g=50.0 in (p,n|g), 15.0 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=254.4 (1975An08), 254.5 (1978Ya06) 
$E|g=254.1, I|g=5.7 in (p,n|g), 2.6 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$Placement from 1975Ke06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.8, but 401.2 component is much weaker than the 400.6, thus the multipolarity assignment is tentative 
$|a(K)exp for 400.6+401.2 doublet 
$I|g=7.0 in (p,n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$|g assigned from 836.4-keV level in 1975Ke06. 
$E|g=364.8 (1975An08) 
$E|g=364.5, I|g=14.7 in (p,n|g), 36.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=364.7, I|g=43 (1978Ya06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>2.5 
$The ce(K) for 177.9 transition used for normalization of other ce data 
$E|g=178.0 (1975An08) 
$E|g=177.8, I|g=5.3 in (p,n|g), 18.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Note that 445.3 {I1} and 445.3 {I3} |g rays, the latter from 899 level are not resolved, however, based on |g-branching ratios in {+189}Ir IT decay (3.7 ms), most of the intensity of the 445|g must belong from the decay of 746 level. 
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>2.5. |a(K)exp for doublet 
$The ce(K) for 445.3 transition used for normalization of other ce data 
$E|g=445.3 (1975An08), also tentative placement from 899 level 
$E|g=445.4, I|g=11.0 in (p,n|g), 22.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.6 
$E|g=459.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=459.6, I|g=11.3 in (p,n|g), 5.0 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$Placement from 1975Ke06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=101.0 (1975An08) 
$E|g=101.0, I|g=1.8 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
M$dipole from |g(|q), M1 from intensity balance arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>2.7 
$|a(K)exp for 465+466 doublet 
$E|g=466.0 (1975An08) 
$E|g=465.6, I|g=35.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=465.6, I|g=33.7 (1978Ya06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.5 
$E|g=284.6 (1975An08) 
$E|g=284.3, I|g=12.0 in (p,n|g), 6.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>2.7 
$|a(K)exp for 465+466 doublet 
$E|g=464.7 (1975An08) 
$E|g=464.1, I|g=19.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$In 1975Ke06, a 332.8|g placed only from the 1448 level 
$See comment for 333.1 {I3} |g ray from 1448 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.4 
$E|g=282.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=282.6, I|g=3.3 in (p,n|g), 2.9 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$Placement from 1975Ke06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.8 
$|a(K)exp for 400.6+401.2 doublet 
$E|g=400.6 (1975An08) 
$E|g=400.2, I|g=11.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=400.3, I|g=16.3 (1978Ya06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.8, but the 349.5|g is a weak component therefore the multipolarity assignment is considered as tentative 
$|a(K)exp for 349+351 doublet 
$E|g=349.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=349.6, I|g=1.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$Placement from 1975Ke06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1975Ke06. Other placement from 1667 level in 1975An08 rejected by evaluators assuming incorrect assignment on the basis of coincidence with 400|g doublet. 
$E|g=529.9 (1975An08) 
$E|g=530.1, I|g=2.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=430.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=430.4, I|g=6.0 in (p,n|g), 13.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=430.4, I|g=15.0 (1978Ya06) 
M$for M1 assignment, |a(L)exp is twice as large as the theoretical value of 0.014, but agrees within about 1.5|s. Moreover, E1 has |a(L)=0.001419 E2 has |a(L)=0.00742, thus the measured value is only consistent with M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=531.6 (1975An08) 
$E|g=531.3, I|g=1.0 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) placed tentatively from a 2187 level 
$E|g=531.2, I|g=1.7 (1978Ya06) placed tentatively from 2187 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$negative sign from parametric plots of A{-2} from ce(|q) and |g(|q) (1983Fa11). Value not given. 
$E|g=378.1 (1975An08) 
$E|g=378.0, I|g=3.2 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Note that 550.3 {I1} and 550.4 {I3} |g rays, the latter from 1651.2 level are not resolved, however, based on |g-branching ratios in {+189}Ir IT decay (3.7 ms), most of the intensity of the 550|g must belong from the decay of 1296 level. 
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>1.3 
$E|g=550.4 (1975An08) 
$E|g=550.1, I|g=19.0 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>1.8 
$E|g=545.8 (1975An08) 
$E|g=545.7, I|g=18.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=545.6, I|g=17.0 (1978Ya06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Note that 333.1 {I3} and 333.3 {I3} |g rays, the latter from tentative 949 level are not resolved. The placement here is mainly assigned to 1447 level based on results from 1975Ke06 
$E|g=333.3 (1975An08), placed from only the 949 level 
$E|g=332.8, I|g=1.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06), placed from 1448 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.7 
$|a(K)exp for 438+441 doublet 
$E|g=441.2 (1975An08), mixed with (|a,3n|g) channel 
$E|g=441.1, I|g=4.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=441.1, I|g=4.3 (1978Ya06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$placement from 2109 level by 1975An08 seems incorrect due to intensity imbalance in the 3.7-ms IT decay dataset. Evaluators suggest placement from 1578 level based on energy difference and possible coincidence with 364.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp is about a factor of two larger than |a(K)(theory,M1)=0.117, there may be some impurity mixed in the ce line for 387.7 transition 
$E|g=387.9 (1975An08); also tentative placement from a 688 level 
$E|g=387.6, I|g=4.1 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 
$E|g=387.7, I|g=4.7 (1978Ya06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=607.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=607.2, I|g=10.0 in (p,n|g), 3.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06); doublet, placed also from a 607.2 level based on a previous work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1975Ke06 
$E|g=614.1 (1975An08), placement from a 2096 level 
$E|g=613.8, I|g=6.0 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.7 
$|a(K)exp for 438+441 doublet 
$E|g=438.5 (1975An08) 
$E|g=438.1, I|g=1.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>1.7 
$E|g=623.7 (1975An08) 
$E|g=623.5, I|g=11.3 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=252.6 (1975An08), 252.5 (1978Ya06) 
$E|g=252.5, I|g=4.0 in (p,n|g), 2.2 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$dipole from |g(|q), intensity balance suggests E1 
$E|g=120.8 (1975An08), mixed with (|a,3n|g) channel. Placed from a 2333 level to 2213 level, and also tentatively from a 1221 level 
$E|g=120.7, I|g=2.7 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from Adopted Gammas 
$E|g=84.4 (1975An08), placed from a 2213 level 
$E|g=84.6, I|g=0.6 in (|a,2n|g) (1975Ke06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Ke06. In delayed spectrum, I|g=0.5 relative to 1.8 for 84.5|g. In 1975An08, a 223.5|g with I|g=1.0 {I2} is placed from 318 and tentatively from 688 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,M$from {+190}Ir IT decay (3.087 h), uncertainty in energy assigned by evaluators, based on that in level energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 36.184 {I17} from {+190}Ir IT decay (3.087 h) and 36.154 {I25} from (p,3n|g) 
M$from {+190}Ir IT decay (3.087 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 135.348 {I14} from {+190}Ir IT decay (3.087 h) and 135.363 {I20} from (p,3n|g) 
M$from {+190}Ir IT decay (3.087 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$photon branching ratio of 205.2|g and 56.1|g are in severe disagreement in IT decay (1996Ga39) and in {+192}Os(p,3n|g),(d,4n|g) work (2000Ga03), both studies by the same experimental group: I|g(205.2)/I|g(56.1)=100.0 {I29}/56.6 {I29} in in-beam |g-ray study (2000Ga03) versus 100.0 {I45}/81.1 {I49} in IT decay (1996Ga30). Here value is adopted from the in-beam |g-ray study by 2000Ga03 
M$from {+190}Ir IT decay (3.087 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$from 1996Ga30, deduced from measured conversion-electron energies. 
M$from L1:L2:L3=13:<1:100 and M1:M3:M5=15:100:5 (1964Ha06) 
$Relative to ce(K)(502|g in {+190}Os)=100, ce(L1)=44 {I7}, ce(L2)<4, ce(L3)=350 {I52}, ce(M)=118 {I18} (1964Ha06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=0.04 {I+3-4} from L1/L2 ratio (using BrIccMixing code), which gives |a(theory)=5.89 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)(205.2|g)/I(|g+ce)(56.1|g)=16.5 {I7}/83.5 {I7} (1996Ga30). The photon intensity ratio of 205.2|g and 56.1|g are in severe disagreement in IT decay (1996Ga30) and in {+192}Os(p,3n|g),(d,4n|g) work (2000Ga03), both from the same group: I|g(205.2)/I|g(56.1)=100.0 {I29}/56.6 {I29} in in-beam |g-ray study (2000Ga03) versus 100.0 {I45}/81.1 {I49} in IT decay (1996Ga30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
TI$from I(|g+ce)(56.128|g+205.206|g) 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and calculated |a by BrIcc 
M$from K:L1:L3=50:40:100 (1964Ha06) 
$Relative to ce(K)(502|g in {+190}Os)=100, ce(K)=70 {I11}, ce(L1)=56 {I9} (partially resolved), ce(L3)=140 {I21}, ce(M)=65 {I10} (1964Ha06). The value of ce(K)(502|g) is the apparent intensity observed in equilibrium with 3.2-h {+190}Ir 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$2000Ga03 pointed out that a large fraction of the intensity of this |g ray remains unassigned. One other component is placed above the 148.7+x level, as suggested by |g|g-coin spectrum in Fig. 6 of 2000Ga03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 129.431 {I5} from {+191}Os |b{+-} decay (15.4 d), 129.416 {I16} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 129.400 {I16} from (n,n'|g), 129.40 {I15} from (p,2n|g), and 129.39 {I4} from Coulomb excitation. 
M from ce data in {+191}Os |b{+-} decay and {+191}Pt |e decay. 
MR Weighted average of -0.402 {I7} (2000Be07 - particle-|g(|q)), -0.46 {I2} (1970Av02 - particle |g(|q)) - both in Coulomb excitation; 0.396 {I4} (1972Br02) and 0.404 {I12} (1964De06) from L subshell ratios in Os |b{+-} decay; -0.398 {I20} (1968Da19) and -0.36 {I+4-1} (1964Wi13) angular correlation on oriented nuc in (|g,|g): Mossbauer; -0.44 {I4} from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25) in {+191}Pt |e decay. Other: -0.28 {I6} (1964Ca11 - |g|g(|q,H,t)) in Os |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 178.9796 {I19} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 179.16 {I8} from (n,n'|g), 178.7 {I5} from (p,2n|g), and 178.96 {I5} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 343.22 {I8} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 343.51 {I6} from (n,n'|g), 343.2 {I5} from (p,2n|g), and 343.2 {I2} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 172.2181 {I25} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 172.16 {I4} from (n,n'|g), 172.0 {I5} from (p,2n|g), and 172.21 {I5} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D(+Q))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 153.0 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 152.9 {I5} from (p,2n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 53 {I11} from (n,n'|g), 58 {I9} from (p,2n|g), and 53 {I7} from Coulomb excitation - relative to I|g(325). 
(|DJ=1) from DCO in {+192}Ir(d,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 282 {I29} from (n,n'|g) and 121 {I14} from (p,2n|g) - relative to I|g(325). 161.2|g not seen in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI |g multiply placed in {+192}Os(p,2n|g) and {+191}Ir(n,n'|g) but likely not in Coulomb excitation; see also comment on 161.2|g I|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 34 {I6} from (n,n'|g), 96 {I10} from Coulomb excitation, and <85 relative to I|g=539=100 (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 74 {I8} from (n,n'|g), 108 {I14} from (p,2n|g), and 91 {I9} from Coulomb excitation. Discrepant data - unweighted average of all values: 82 {I11}. 
MR from 1976Kr21 evaluation, using |g|g(|q) of 1972Be01, 1969Ow02, and 1973Il02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 36 {I7} from (n,n'|g), 71 {I9} from (p,2n|g), and 22.9 {I26} from Coulomb excitation. Discrepant data - unweighted average of all values: 38 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 538.897 {I11} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 539.05 {I11} from (n,n'|g), and 539.1 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 458.546 {I20} from {+191}Pt |e decay and 458.79 {I13} from (n,n'|g). Other: 458.6 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 
RI weighted average of 38 {I3} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 41 {I8} from (n,n'|g), and 39 {I4} from Coulomb excitation. Other: 139 {I16} from (p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 587.98 {I3} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 588.21 {I13} from (n,n'|g), and 587.7 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I3} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 100 {I11} from (n,n'|g), 100 {I10} from (p,2n|g), and 100 {I11} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 420.12 {I15} from (n,n'|g), 420.1 {I5} from (p,2n|g), and 419.9 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$Others: 20 {I5} from (n,n'|g), and 51 {I5} from Coulomb excitation. Discrepant data - unweighted average of all values: 32 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 263.22 {I6} from (n,n'|g) and 263.10 {I15} from (p,2n|g) 
RI Other: >150 in {+192}Os(p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI This transition seems not to be a multiplet in Coulomb excitation; placed also from levels 825.4 and 1135.1 keV in other reactions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M Mult=E2(+M1) with |d>3 from {+191}Pt |e decay; see comment on 659 keV level J|p for adopted multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 557.10 {I13} from (n,n'|g) and 556.8 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 
MR From particle-|g(|q) in Coulomb excitation (1984Mu19,2000Be07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 208.96 {I15} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 209.06 {I9} from (n,n'|g), and 209.0 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 2.82 {I25} from {+191}Pt |e decay, 4.8 {I16} from (n,n'|g), and 16 {I11} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
(|DJ=1) from DCO in (d,3n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 70 {I30} from (n,n'|g), 67 {I8} and 77 {I7} from (p,2n|g), and 55 {I7} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 815.5 {I7} from (n,n'|g) and 816.0 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 74 {I21} from (n,n'|g), 67 {I9} from (p,2n|g), and 71 {I17} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
(|DJ=1) from DCO in {+192}Ir(d,3n|g). 
E$weighted average of 445.2 {I2} from (n,n'|g), 445.50 {I15} from (p,2n|g), and 445.6 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI from {+192}Os(d,3n|g), where it is a singlet (seen as a doublet in {+191}Ir(n,n'|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 480 {I1} from (p,2n|g) and 479.6 {I5} from (HI,xn|g) 
RI from {+192}Os(d,3n|g), where it is multiply placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 406.9 {I3} from (n,n'|g) and 406.5 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 
RI$Undivided intensity of multiplaced E|g in (p,2n|g),(d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI In Coulomb excitation, 586|g is a doublet and the intensity could not be divided; 414.3|g was not seen in {+191}Ir(n,n'|g), where 586.2|g intensity could be divided. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 395.1 {I5} (p,2n|g) and 395.4 {I5} (HI,xn|g) 
M,MR$From |a(exp)=0.11 {I2} (HI,xn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 82.46 {I2} (1972McYW) 
RI$From 2021Kr02. Other: 61 {I6} (1971Pr12) 
MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=47.4 {I12}:96.5 {I14}:88.3 {I13}. Sign of |d is from Mossbauer oriented nuc (1983Be71). Other: 1967Wa20, Mossbauer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 129.400 {I7} (1971Pr12) and 129.4320 {I10} (2007La18). Other: 129.48 {I2} (1972McYW) 
RI$weighted average of 38.1 {I18} (1970Ma10) and 40 {I4} (1971Pr12) 
MR from adopted gammas. Others: |d=0.40 from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=105:30:18 (1962Ha24), no uncertainty given, and |d=-0.44 {I4} from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ba56. 
RI From ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=4.1 {I8}:4.9 {I8} (1970Ba56 normalized value) and subshell theoretical ICCs. 
M from {+191}Os |b{+-} decay (15.4 d). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 49.59 {I3} (1970Ma10) and 49.548 {I3} (1995BuZZ) 
RI from adopted I|g(96.5|g) and I|g(49.6|g)/I|g(96.5|g) calculated as the average from: relative I|g deduced from ce(L) ratio and adopted |a(L); I(|g+ce)(49.6):I(|g+ce)(96.5)=5 {I1}:316 {I14} from |g|g coinc in 1971Pr12 and adopted |a. 
M,MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=3.0 {I4}:0.98 {I16}:0.7 {I3} (1970Ma10 normalized value) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 96.5517 {I11} (2007La18), 96.552 {I2} (1995BuZZ), 96.544 {I15} (2021Kr02). Others: 96.517 {I9} (1971Pr12), 96.56 {I2} (1972McYW). 
RI$Weighted average of 37.9 {I19} (1970Ma10), 42 {I2} (1971Pr12), and 39.3 {I12} (2021Kr02). 
MR from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=35.5 {I5}:4.8 {I3}:1.9 {I2}. Sign of |d is from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). Other: |d=+0.10 {I+8-18} |g|g(|q) (1972Be01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 178.9791 {I25} (2007La18), 178.980 {I3} (1995BuZZ), 178.984 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 178.96 {I3} (1971Pr12). Other: 178.91 {I5} (1972McYW) 
RI$Weighted average of 12.2 {I6} (1970Ma10), 12.7 {I6} (1971Pr12), and 12.8 {I2} (2021Kr02). 
MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=8.58 {I19}:1.51 {I9}:0.64 {I6}:0.35 {I5}. Sign of |d is from |g|g(|q) (1972Be01) and |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$From 2021Kr02. Other: 343.2 {I4} (1971Pr12) 
RI 0.16 {I5} (1971Pr12) and 0.143 {I32} (2021Kr02) 
M from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 172.2171 {I30} (2007La18), 172.221 {I5} (1995BuZZ), 172.224 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 172.19 {I2} (1971Pr12). 
RI$Weighted average of 41.9 {I20} (1970Ma10), 44 {I2} (1971Pr12), and 44.1 {I9} (2021Kr02). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=47.5 {I8}:7.01 {I11}:0.70 {I5}:0.09 {I3}. 
MR from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). Other: from Ice data fit |d=0.07 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 221.762 {I5} (2007La18), 221.769 {I6} (1995BuZZ), 221.766 {I12} (2021Kr02), and 221.74 {I8} (1971Pr12). 
RI$Weighted average of 1.7 {I2} (1970Ma10), 1.45 {I15} (1971Pr12), and 1.51 {I4} (2021Kr02) 
M$ce(K)=1.05 {I12} (1970Ma10 normalized value) yields |a(K)exp=0.68 {I9} gives |d=0.00 {I22}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 268.773 {I5} (1995BuZZ), 268.767 {I12} (2021Kr02), and 268.71 {I8} (1971Pr12). 
RI$weighted average of 20.6 {I20} (1971Pr12) and 21.0 {I3} (2021Kr02). Others: see comment on I|g for 267.92|g, 
M E2(+M1) from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp= 1.78 {I14}: 0.27 {I15}:0.39 {I6}:0.15 {I6}. Ice data fit gives |d=4.3 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 351.1851 {I20} (2007La18), 351.201 {I6} (1995BuZZ), 351.185 {I10} (2021Kr02), 351.17 {I3} (1971Pr12). Other: 351.24 {I3} (1972McYW). 
RI$Weighted average of 43.5 {I21} (1970Ma10), 42 {I5} (1971Pr12), and 44.7 {I5} (2021Kr02) 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=6.76 {I15}:1.11 {I8}: <0.1: <0.03. 
MR from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 219.672 {I5} (2007La18), 219.681 {I10} (2021Kr02), 219.65 {I5} (1971Pr12), and 219.68 {I6} (1972McYW). 
RI$Weighted average of 10.9 {I6} (1970Ma10), 10.3 {I5} (1971Pr12), and 10.7 {I2} (2021Kr02) 
M E2(+M1) from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp= 1.70 {I16}:0.25 {I5}:0.39 {I5}:0.41 {I7} yields |d=4.2 {I3}. |DJ=2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 187.7200 {I25} (2007La18), 187.721 {I3} (1995BuZZ), 187.731 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 187.69 {I4} (1971Pr12), and 187.8 {I1} (1972McYW). 
RI$weighted average of 5.2 {I3} (1971Pr12), 5.0 {I3} (1970Ma10), and 4.96 {I10} (2021Kr02). 
MR from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2) exp=3.77 {I19}:0.91 {I18}:0.31 {I18}. Other: |d=+0.10 {I3}, deduced by 1981La25 using its measured |d of 351|g on 1972Be01 |g|g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 359.9282 {I21} (2007La18), 359.942 {I6} (1995BuZZ), 359.934 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 359.88 {I3} (1971Pr12). Other: 359.94 {I3} (1972McYW). 
RI$Weighted average of 73.1 {I37} (1970Ma10), 75 {I4} (1971Pr12), 74.7 {I8} (2021Kr02), and 71.2 {I20} (1970Sc20). 
M,CC ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=12.9 {I3}:1.86 {I5}:0.10 {I3}: <0.03, outlier in Ice data fit: |a(K) and |a(L1) exp:theory=0.172 {I2}:0.142 {I2} and 18.6 {I56}:11.0 {I2}, respectively. 
MR from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). Other values: +0.14 {I2} |g(|q) (1973Il02); +0.08 {I+6-7} (1976Kr21 evaluation of 1972Be01 |g|g(|q)); +0.08 {I+8-7} |g(|q) (1980Be27). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 409.464 {I5} (2007La18), 409.490 {I6} (1995BuZZ), 409.453 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 409.44 {I2} (1971Pr12). Other: 409.47 {I3} (1972McYW). 
RI$From 2021Kr02. Other: 100 {I5} (1971Pr12) 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=11.23 {I15}:1.87 {I12}:0.19 {I9}: <0.04. Ice data fit gives 0 {I7} % E2. 
MR from 1976Kr21 evaluation, using |g|g(|q) of 1972Be01, 1969Ow02, and 1973Il02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 456.4753 {I11} (2007La18), 456.493 {I6} (1995BuZZ), 456.500 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 456.47 {I5} (1971Pr12). Other: 456.51 {I3} (1972McYW). 
RI from 2021Kr02. Others: 42 {I2} (1971Pr12), 42.9 {I20} (1970Ma10) and 42.3 {I20} (1970Sc20). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1) exp=2.93 {I9}:0.36 {I9} 
MR from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). Other: |d=0.34 {I24} from Ice data fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 538.9038 {I23} (2007La18), 538.921 {I6} (1995BuZZ), 538.892 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 538.87 {I5} (1971Pr12). Other: 538.92 {I3} (1972McYW). 
RI$Weighted average of 186 {I8} (1970Ma10), 171 {I9} (1971Pr12), 183 {I2} (2021Kr02), and 179 {I8} (1970Sc20). 
M from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=7.34 {I19}:1.15 {I9}: <0.12: <0.12. 
MR from |g(|q) oriented nuc (1981La25). Other values: |d=0.84 {I+21-18} |g(|q) (1980Be27); |d=0.60 {I7} from Ice data fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 458.59 {I15} (1971Pr12) and 458.545 {I20} (2021Kr02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.54 {I10} (1971Pr12) and 0.74 {I3} (2021Kr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 588.007 {I24} (2021Kr02) and 587.95 {I8} (1971Pr12). 
RI$weighted average of 1.70 {I13} (1971Pr12), 1.92 {I10} (1970Ma10), 1.92 {I8} (1970Sc20), and 1.88 {I15} (2021Kr02). 
M ce(K)=0.085 {I12} (1971Ba45 after normalization). Ice data fit gives |d=0.0 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 445.111 {I8} (2007La18), 445.102 {I7} (1995BuZZ), 445.144 {I18} (2021Kr02), and 445.13 {I8} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.82 {I8} (1970Ma10), 0.68 {I7} (1971Pr12), 0.75 {I2} (2021Kr02), and 0.7 {I1} (1970Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 494.671 {I6} (2007La18), 494.650 {I7} (1995BuZZ), 494.689 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 494.69 {I7} (1971Pr12). 
RI$weighted average of 0.75 {I7} (1971Pr12), 0.76 {I8} (1970Ma10), and 0.75 {I2} (2021Kr02). 
M (M1,E2) from ce(K)=0.031 {I10} (1971Ba45 normalized value). Ice data fit gives |d=1.0 {I5}. Decay scheme requires E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 1.654 {I7} (1995BuZZ), 541.698 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 541.64 {I10} (1971Pr12) 
RI$weighted average of 4.6 {I5} (1971Pr12) and 5.43 {I5} (2021Kr02) 
M from ce(K) exp=0.21 {I5}. Ice data fit gives |d=0.0 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 624.082 {I7} (1995BuZZ), 624.117 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 624.06 {I6} (1971Pr12). Other: 624.14 {I5} (1972McYW). 
RI$weighted average of 20.5 {I15} (1970Ma10), 17.6 {I9} (1971Pr12), 19.1 {I2} (2021Kr02), and 18.4 {I10} (1970Sc20). 
M,MR from ce(K) exp=0.59 {I5}. Ice data fit gives |d=0.35 {I22}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 267.979 {I10} (2021Kr02) and 267.92 {I8} (1971Pr12) 
RI weighted average of 9.7 {I10} (1971Pr12) and 10.0 {I1} (2021Kr02). Other: I|g(267.92)+I|g(268.71)=32.4 {I20} (1970Sc20), 33.0 {I17} (1970Ma10); I|g(268.7)/I|g(267.9)=2.7 {I5} (1970Ma10). 
M E2+(M1) from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp= 0.95 {I6}:0.31 {I15}:0.27 {I15}:0.16 {I6}. Ice data fit gives |d=3.16 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 479.9416 {I7} (2007La18), 479.955 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 479.95 {I7} (1971Pr12). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.61 {I7} (1970Ma10), 0.71 {I7} (1971Pr12), 0.65 {I2} (2021Kr02), and 0.72 {I5} (1970Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 576.4930 {I35} (2007La18), 576.523 {I10} (2021Kr02), and 576.46 {I8} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 1.6 {I2} (1970Ma10), 1.47 {I11} (1971Pr12), 1.57 {I2} (2021Kr02), and 1.59 {I7} (1970Sc20). 
M from ce(K) exp=0.013 {I4} yields |a(K)exp=0.008 {I3}; decay scheme requires parity change and |a(K): E1=0.0049; M2=0.142. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 658.76 {I6} (2021Kr02) and 658.75 {I15} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.20 {I4} (1970Ma10), 0.19 {I2} (1971Pr12), 0.254 {I23} (2021Kr02), and 0.20 {I3} (1970Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 1.6 {I1} (1970Ma10) and 1.7 {I3} (1971Pr12) 
M,MR$from ce(K)=0.93 {I16} (1971Ba45 normalized value) yields |a(K)exp=0.57 {I10}. |d=0.4 {I6} from ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 396.75 {I7} (2021Kr02) and 396.7 {I2} (1971Pr12) 
RI$weighted average of 0.13 {I4} (1971Pr12) and 0.155 {I21} (2021Kr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 568.809 {I17} (2021Kr02), 568.81 {I8} (1971Pr12), and 568.855 {I6} (2007La18). 
RI$weighted average of 0.68 {I4} (1970Ma10) and 0.66 {I5} (1971Pr12), and 0.72 {I2} (2021Kr02). 
M from ce(K) exp=0.033 {I6} (1971Ba45 normalized value). Ice data fit gives |d=0.0 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 618.47 {I7} (2021Kr02) and 618.7 {I4} (1971Pr12) 
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I4} (1971Pr12) and 0.103 {I11} (2021Kr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 747.67 {I12} (2021Kr02) and 748.0 {I2} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.045 {I10} (1970Ma10), 0.052 {I10} (1971Pr12), 0.063 {I11} (2021Kr02), and 0.042 {I5} (1970Sc20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 223.6717 {I32} (2007La18), 223.677 {I9} (1995BuZZ), 223.663 {I13} (2021Kr02), and 223.67 {I8} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 1.3 {I2} (1970Ma10), 1.40 {I15} (1971Pr12), and 1.50 {I21} (2021Kr02). 
M,MR$from ce(K):ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=0.73 {I6}:0.05 {I4}: <0.03: <0.03. Ice data fit gives |d=0.23 {I26}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 583.617 {I6} (2007La18), 583.618 {I11} (1995BuZZ), 583.660 {I16} (2021Kr02), and 583.61 {I8} (1971Pr12). 
RI$weighted average of 0.95 {I7} (1971Pr12) and 0.96 {I3} (2021Kr02). and 0.93 {I8} (1970Sc20). Other: 1.39 {I10} (1970Ma10) - |g line was not well resolved from 587.95|g. 
M ce(K)=0.036 {I8} (1971Ba45 after normalization). Ice data fit gives |d=0.0 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 633.166 {I11} (1995BuZZ), 633.213 {I11} (2021Kr02), and 633.18 {I10} (1971Pr12). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.37 {I4} (1970Ma10), 0.30 {I3} (1971Pr12), 0.336 {I16} (2021Kr02), 0.38 {I2} (1970Sc20), and 0.36 {I5} (1966Bl03) 
M from ce(K) exp=0.0049 {I16} (1971Ba45 normalized value). Ice data fit gives |d=2.3 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 680.170 {I11} (1995BuZZ), 680.54 {I12} (2021Kr02), and 680.0 {I2} (1971Pr12). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.09 {I7} (1970Ma10), 0.086 {I17} (1971Pr12), 0.066 {I11} (2021Kr02), 0.10 {I1} (1970Sc20), and 0.09 {I7} (1966Bl03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 762.76 {I6} (2021Kr02) and 762.60 {I15} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.17 {I2} (1970Ma10), 0.15 {I2} (1971Pr12), 0.190 {I16} (2021Kr02), 0.16 {I2} (1970Sc20), and 0.23 {I8} (1966Bl03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from 1971Pr12. 
M,MR$from ce(K) exp=1.6 {I4} (1971Pr12) yields |a(K)exp=1.6 {I4}. |d=0.4 {I5} from ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Weighted average of E|g = 756.6 {I5} and 756.2 {I8}; and I|g=0.020 and 0.015 {I10}, from 1970Sc20 and 1970Ma10, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Weighted average of E|g = 853.6 {I4} and 853.2 {I10}; I|g=0.013 {I1} and 0.015 {I10}, from 1970Sc20 and 1970Ma10, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 935.88 {I8} (2021Kr02) and 935.33 {I15} (1971Pr12) 
RI$Weighted average of 0.16 {I2} (1970Ma10), 0.15 {I2} (1971Pr12), 0.162 {I13} (2021Kr02), 0.14 {I1} (1970Sc20), and 0.14 {I2} (1967Sc25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1971Pr12 renormalized to 100 for 343|g. I|g=6.5 {I13} given by 1986Mc01 is inaccurate because of absorber and detector-efficiency corrections. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR particle-|g(|q) (2000Be07). Other values: -0.34 {I4} or -1.69 {I4} (1984Mu19), -0.37 {I+10-14} (1970Av02), -0.45 {I3} or -0.98 {I11} (1981HuZU) particle-|g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=143 {I10} in (d,3n|g), from I|g(343|g)=225 {I14} in (d,3n|g) and adopted I|g(213|g)/I|g(343|g)=0.637 {I17}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=22 {I8} in (d,3n|g) from I|g(686|g)=17 {I6} in (d,3n|g) and I|g(557|g)/I|g(686|g)=1.32 {I7} in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=82 {I10} in (d,3n|g), from I|g(213|g)=225 {I14} in (d,3n|g) and I|g(213|g) from 343 level=143 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=64 {I13} in (d,3n|g), includes intensity from 1243 level, calculated from I|g=86 {I10} in (d,3n|g) and I|g(556|g)=22 {I8} from 686 level, see comment on 556|g from 686 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
I|g=64 {I13} in (d,3n|g), includes intensity from 1210 level, see comment on 556|g from 1210 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ra37, cryst. Other values: 82.46 keV {I4} (1969Ma07); 82.52 keV {I3} (1966Ma50); 82.5 keV {I3} (1963Pl01), scin X|g, 82.428 {I3} (1995BuZZ). 
RI using I(|g+ce)(82.4)=I(|g+ce)(47.0) from decay scheme, adopted |a, and I|g(47.0). Other: I|g(92.4)/I|g(129.0)=0.0010 {I5} (1969Ma07), Ge(Li). 
M,MR From adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1969Ma07, Ge(Li). Other values: 46.90 keV {I6} (1967Pl01); 47.004 {I3} (1995BuZZ). 
RI from ce(L)(47.0):ce(K)(129.4)exp=0.96 {I7}:206 {I15} (1969Ma07) and corresponding theoretical values for adopted multipolarities. Other: I|g(47.0)/I|g(129.4)<0.0015 (1969Ma07) Ge(Li). 
M from ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3) exp=3 {I2}:48 {I5}:45 {I5} (1969Ma07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1970Ra37, cryst. Other: 129.432 {I1} (1995BuZZ) 
RI from I(|g+ce)(129.4)+I(|g+ce)(47.0)=100, adopted I|g(47.0), and adopted |a. 
M,MR From adopted gammas. Other values: |d=-0.28 {I6} (1964Ca11) |g|g(|q,H,t). 
CC |a(K)exp=2.134 {I14} (2005Ni12) from |a(K)|w(K)= 2.044 {I11}, ratio between K| x ray and |g with a specially calibrated HPGe detector, and using |w(K)=0.958 {I4} (1996Sc06). Other: |a(K)exp=1.94 {I10} (1963Pl01); |a(K)exp=2.32 {I6} (1965La05). 
See 1979Gi01, 1981Gi11, 1984El03, and 1984Sa13 for measurements of linear and circular polarizations, respectively, of this |g in an external magnetic field. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 41.85 keV {I1} (1966Ma50), 41.85 keV {I3} (1971Pl05), 41.76 keV {I2} (1967Pl01), 41.83 keV {I3} (1963Pl01), and 41.92 keV {I2} (1969Ma07). 
RI from I(|g+ce)(41.8)=100 and adopted |a. 
M from subshell ratios, see values under the heading. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=1.14 {I13}, numerical value (fig. 3) was received from the first author of 2012Dr02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$ inferred from total intensity balance and total electron conversion coefficient. It seems that uncertainty in total conversion coefficient from BrIcc code was not included in the assigned uncertainty of 0.02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E$no prompt component observed in 308.5|g(t), consistent with the the proposition that this |g ray directly depopulates an isomer 
M$from |a(exp)=4.1 {I6}, numerical value (fig. 3) was received from the first author of 2012Dr02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp allows mult=M1 or E1+M2 (|d=+0.21 {I3}); |D|p=yes from level scheme, but |d violates RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E from Adopted Gammas. Other E|g: 58.0 {I4} (1958Mi85). 
M from measured |a(L)exp and subshell ratios. |a(L)exp=2040 {I430} (from I(Ir L| x ray)/I(56.7|g)=632 {I105} and L fluorescence yield=0.31 {I5}) (1971Ge11); |a(L)exp=1660 {I250}, (|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp)=2030 {I230} (1968Wi10); L2/L3=1.1 (1954Mi85). 
(L2M2)/L2(double conversion)=0.029 {I9}, (L3M3)/L3(double conversion)=0.034 {I10} (1975Pr06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E5)
decay_comment:
E from 1977ScZU. Other value: 161 keV {I5} (1959Sc41). 
CC Other |a(E5 theory): 1106 {I8} (private communication from K. Alder to authors of 1977ScZU). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
From subshell ratios of 1991Ke10, viz., L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:M4+M5:N2+N3=2.7 {I13}:100 {I8}:92 {I11}:28 {I4}:22.5 {I23}:2.9 {I5}:17 {I3}. 
E from ce data (1991Ke10). Other E|g: 56.67 {I2} (1989Du03). 
RI from 1989Du03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3:M1=100 {I20}:45 {I13}:53 {I13}:26 {I8} (1991Ke10). Mult=E1+M2, |d=+0.055 {I+10-13} from |a(L1)exp alone is considered less reliable than results based on subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1=100 {I10}:29 {I4}:23 {I3}:24 {I5}:8.9 {I26}:8.1 {I16} (authors' analysis, 1991Ke10). |d=0.17 {I+25-17} from |a(L1)exp alone. 
RI from 1989Du03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1989Du03. 
Other E|g (I|g): 58.83 {I6} (69 {I4}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
MR from authors' analysis of unenumerated subshell ratios (L1, L2, L3, M1, M2, M3, N1 shells). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Mult=M4 (|a=1082)implied by level scheme, inconsistent with absence of transition in ce spectrum. Therefore, |g is probably misplaced (1991Ke10); consequently, this placement has been omitted from Adopted Levels, Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Population ratio>6.0 in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10); from this ratio 1997BaZV and 1991Ke10 favor J=5 and 4, respectively, for parent level. Therefore, the evaluator does not adopt the placement of the 127|g from the J=2, 320 level suggested in 1991Ke10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 136.2 {I5} (149 {I5}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
|a(K)exp=1.8 {I3}, mult=M1 (1991Ke10) for (136.2|g+136.1|g) favors mult=M1,E2 for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M |a(L1)exp allows mult=M1 or E1+M2 (|d=0.21 {I3}); the latter is required by level scheme, but |d violates RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M from L1:L2:L3:M1=100 {I20}:38 {I18}:38 {I18}:27 {I13} (1991Ke10). Mult=E1+M2, |d=+0.091 {I+13-15} from |a(L1)exp alone is considered less reliable than result based on subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M from K:L1:M1=100 {I10}:13.2 {I26}:7 {I3}. Mult=M1+E2, |d=+0.39 {I+19-27} from |a(K)exp alone is considered less reliable than result based on subshell ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 216.75 {I5} (72 {I3}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data); presumably for doublet (216.9|g +216.2|g). 
Population ratio=3.0 {I10} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10); from this ratio 1997BaZV and 1991Ke10 favor J=4 and 3, respectively, for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from 1991Ke10, presumably based on K:L2:L3. mult=E2+M1, |d=2.1 {I+21-6} based on |a(K)exp alone. 
Other E|g (I|g): 169.25 {I5} (39.6 {I17}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 169.25 {I5} (39.6 {I17}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
|a(K)exp=1.7 {I7}, mult=M1 (1991Ke10) for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Population ratio=0.85 {I9} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10); J=1 assumed for parent level in order to normalize measured ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.8 {I3} (1991Ke10) for (136.2|g+136.1|g) doublet in which this transition is major component implies mult=M1 for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 144.79 {I6} (51.3 {I25}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
|a(K)exp=1.6 {I3} (1991Ke10) for (144.8|g+144.9|g) doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Population ratio=1.5 {I4} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=2 or possibly 3 for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Population ratio=1.08 {I20} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=2 or possibly 1 for parent level. 
Other E|g (I|g): 206.19 {I6} (48.1 {I23}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Population ratio=0.97 {I16} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=2 or possibly 1 for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 226.23 {I14} (52 {I5}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
Population ratio=1.08 {I12} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=2 for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 138.43 {I10} (16.8 {I13}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
M E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 216.75 {I5} (72 {I3}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data); presumably for doublet (216.9|g +216.2|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1,E2
decay_comment:
Population ratio=1.25 {I35} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=2 or possibly 1 for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 262.01 {I6} (39.6 {I23}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
Population ratio=1.35 {I21} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=2 for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=1.6 {I3} (1991Ke10), mult=M1 for doubly-placed |g. 
Other E|g (I|g): 148.85 {I6} (30.3 {I18}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
Population ratio=1.0 {I4} in (n,|g) E=resonance (1991Ke10) favors J=1,2 for parent level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 73.35 {I5} (555 {I19}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). Presumably a complex line in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 156.38 {I6} (35.8 {I16}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
|a(K)exp=0.9 {I19} (1991Ke10) obviously includes a typographical error, presumably in the uncertainty (authors assign M1(+E2)). 
Placement supported by |g|g coin data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Other E|g (I|g): 273.23 {I17} (9.4 {I22}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data). 
|a(K)exp=0.16 {I9}, mult=E2 (1991Ke10) for doubly-placed |g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.45 {I16} (1991Ke10), mult=M1(+E2) for multiply-placed |g. 
Other E|g (I|g): 210.74 {I10} (27 {I5}) (2007ChZX; Budapest Data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g/E|g{+5}=0.44 {I3} 
In the E(n)=2 keV Kiev study, this is a doublet (E|g=5761.4 {I11} and 5756.1 {I15}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI Others: 100 {I6} (|b{+-} decay), 57 {I12} (Coul. Ex), 47 {I6} (n,n'|g), 21 {I5} ((d,n|g) - complex peak). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI there is a disagreement about this I|g. The branching ratios are given as 3.1 {I9} ({+193}Os |b{+-} decay, deduced from |g|g data), 31 {I4} ({+192}Ir(n,|g)), 44 {I7} ({+192}Os(d,n|g)). See {+192}Ir(n,|g) for comment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 73.012 {I7} (1972Pr04), 73.10 {I4} (1970Be06), 73.044 {I3} (1971Lu08), 72.951 {I46} (2012Kr05). 
RI$Weighted average of 82 {I12} (1972Pr04) and 74 {I14} (2012Kr05). 
M,MR |a(L1)exp=1.11 {I16} (1972Pr04); L1:L2:L3=72.7 {I14}: 105 {I3}: 100 {I3} (1972Pr04) Other ce measurements (1968Pl03,1969Co08,1970Be06) agree closely with those of 1972Pr04. |d from adopted gammas, Other: |d=0.56 {I4} from conversion electron data, see |d footnote. 
Calculated circular polarization of |g (1988Fe11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted Gammas. Other: 80.19 (1972Pr04) 
M From Adopted Gammas 
TI Deduced from intensity balance at 80.2 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E From 2005Za15. Other: 65.87 keV {I6} (1970Be06). In 1970Be06 this |g-ray placed from 138.949 keV level, however, in 1972Pr04 a comparable transition energy listed as 64.90 keV {I5} identified as K{-|a1} line. Evaluator mark as uncertain placement and not adopted. 2005Za15 also identified as tentative placement. 
RI From 1970Be06. I|g estimated from I(ce(L3))=0.8 {I2}. 


