# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 4046.62 {I13} from 1990Is07 and 4047.3 {I3} from 1995Bo05. Unassigned by 1990Is07 
RI$2.6 {I5} from 1990Is07 (renormalized by 1995Bo05) and 2.1 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 4076.10 {I9} from 1990Is07 and 4076.64 {I19} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 3.2 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 3.4 {I6} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4103.3 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 4103.52 {I17} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 1.5 {I7} from 1990Is07 and 4.4 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4166.19 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 4166.11 {I12} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 7.43 {I23} from 1990Is07 and 7.3 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 4252.10 {I6} from 1990Is07 and 4251.49 {I12} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 9.1 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 8.4 {I10} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4280.28 {I8} from 1990Is07 and 4280.42 {I15} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 4.8 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 5.3 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 4288.03 {I6} from 1990Is07 and 4287.73 {I12} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 8.6 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 8.3 {I6} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4369.47 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 4369.44 {I9} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 8.4 {I3} from 1990Is07 and 9.5 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4414.42 {I25} from 1990Is07 and 4414.12 {I21} from 1995Bo05. Unassigned by 1990Is07 
RI$2.3 {I4} from 1990Is07 (renormalized by 1995Bo05) and 1.8 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4469.25 {I25} from 1990Is07 and 4468.8 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 2.4 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 0.70 {I9} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4482.8 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 4481.7 {I6} from 1995Bo05. Unassigned by 1990Is07 
RI$from 1995Bo05. Other: 1.2 {I4} from 1990Is07 (renormalized by 1995Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4531.67 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 4531.96 {I21} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 4.79 {I18} from 1990Is07 and 2.4 {I6} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4609.36 {I9} from 1990Is07 and 4609.2 {I3} from 1995Bo05. Unassigned by 1990Is07 
RI$3.4 {I4} from 1990Is07 (renormalized by 1995Bo05) and 3.2 {I4} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4676.65 {I20} from 1990Is07 and 4677.8 {I8} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 2.6 {I3} from 1990Is07 and 2.3 {I4} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4689.61 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 4689.73 {I19} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 21.9 {I7} from 1990Is07 and 16.8 {I11} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4968.39 {I6} from 1990Is07 and 4968.18 {I22} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 19.1 {I7} from 1990Is07 and 10.3 {I6} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5107.35 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 5107.84 {I21} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 8.83 {I25} from 1990Is07 and 8.3 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5169.05 {I9} from 1990Is07 and 5169.6 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 2.14 {I14} from 1990Is07 and 1.55 {I14} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5235.71 {I8} from 1990Is07 and 5235.4 {I4} from 1995Bo05. Unassigned by 1990Is07 
RI$from 1995Bo05. Other: 1.55 {I9} from 1990Is07 (renormalized by 1995Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5272.93 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 5273.08 {I22} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 11.6 {I3} from 1990Is07 and 9.9 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5354.20 {I15} from 1990Is07 and 5353.1 {I15} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 1.10 {I11} from 1990Is07 and 0.57 {I7} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5369.15 {I20} from 1990Is07 and 5368.3 {I9} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 0.95 {I10} from 1990Is07 and 0.57 {I9} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5449.19 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 5448.36 {I22} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 10.7 {I3} from 1990Is07 and 6.2 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5561.80 {I6} from 1990Is07 and 5561.8 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 3.74 {I19} from 1990Is07 and 3.97 {I20} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5620.53 {I11} from 1990Is07 and 5619.5 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 1.23 {I7} from 1990Is07 and 2.23 {I11} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5680.38 {I9} from 1990Is07 and 5680.6 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 1.71 {I8} from 1990Is07 and 0.81 {I4} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5694.56 {I9} from 1990Is07 and 5695.6 {I4} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 1.81 {I8} from 1990Is07 and 0.95 {I5} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5730.83 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 5730.93 {I15} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$from 1990Is07. 1995Bo05 normalize their I|g with respect to 1436|g, 5730|g of 1990Is07 and get I|g(5730|g)=95 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5815.77 {I15} from 1990Is07 and 5816.0 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 1.01 {I8} from 1990Is07 and 0.33 {I9} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$has interference with background line (1995Bo05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5831.06 {I11} from 1990Is07 and 5831.5 {I11} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 1.33 {I10} from 1990Is07 and 0.5 {I2} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5972.35 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 5972.52 {I19} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 6.64 {I13} from 1990Is07 and 6.1 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6028.48 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 6028.30 {I15} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 14.6 {I3} from 1990Is07 and 12.8 {I7} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 6166.23 {I13} from 1990Is07 and 6165.4 {I4} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 0.87 {I7} from 1990Is07 and 1.06 {I6} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6303.70 {I11} from 1990Is07 and 6304.3 {I11} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 0.40 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 0.3 {I1} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 6393.81 {I13} from 1990Is07 and 6394.8 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 0.64 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 0.71 {I25} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6421.49 {I5} from 1990Is07 and 6421.31 {I17} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 4.57 {I12} from 1990Is07 and 4.66 {I24} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 7175.57 {I6} from 1990Is07 and 7175.64 {I10} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$weighted average of 1.36 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 1.39 {I8} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 8611.28 {I10} from 1990Is07 and 8611.2 {I3} from 1995Bo05. 
RI$unweighted average of 0.87 {I4} from 1990Is07 and 0.44 {I4} from 1995Bo05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$1435.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 1435.86 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$1000 {I11} (1984Di03), 1000 {I70} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I2} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.261 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.095 {I12} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+2.4 {I+7-4} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$462.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 462.79 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$309 {I7} (1984Di03), 332 {I23} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I1} (1984Di03) A{-2}=+0.233 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.047 {I12} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+2.1 {I+6-2} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$191.9 {I1} (1984Di03), 191.95 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$75 {I2} (1984Di03), 88 {I6} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.074 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I12} (2003Go02), see text in 2003Go02. Isotropic transition (1984Di03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$754.0 {I1} (1984Di03), 754.05 {I2} (2003Go02). Placed by by 2003Go02, unplaced in 1984Di03 
RI$unweighted of 15 {I1} (1984Di03), 19.0 {I13} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.001 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I20}, isotropic transition (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$112.6 {I1} (1984Di03), 112.51 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$from 2003Go02. Other: 18 {I1} (1984Di03) 
MR$from 1984Di03. Other: |d=+0.03 {I7} from 2003Go02 
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I8} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$782.0 {I1} (1984Di03), 782.12 {I10} (2003Go02) 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.7 {I2} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (2003Go02) 
MR$or +2.5 {I+7-4} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.1 {I+10-6} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$2217.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 2217.86 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$87 {I3} (1984Di03), 92 {I6} (2003Go02) 
M$Q from |g(|q) , M2 ruled out by RUL 
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I1} (1984Di03) A{-2}=+0.270 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.092 {I12} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$408.9 {I1} (1984Di03), 408.96 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$32 {I1} (1984Di03), 36.0 {I25} (2003Go02) 
MR$from 1984Di03. Other: |d=+0.03 {I2} from 2003Go02 
$A{-2}=+0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.322 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.002 {I15} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+3.1 {I+12-4} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$871.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 871.68 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$37 {I3} (1984Di03), 39 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I9} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.311 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.067 {I15} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+3.5 {I+15-7} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$107.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 107.8 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.0 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I33} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$212.3 {I1} (1984Di03), 212.28 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$8 {I1} (1984Di03), 9.3 {I7} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I10} (1984Di03), A{-2}=-0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$324.9 {I1} (1984Di03), 324.83 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$16 {I1} (1984Di03), 16.9 {I12} (2003Go02) 
MR$other: |d=-7.8 {I+16-18} from 1984Di03 
$A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.00 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I8} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+0.9 {I2} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$516.6 {I1} (1984Di03), 516.70 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$from 2003Go02. Other: 43 {I3} (1984Di03) 
$A{-2}=-0.121 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.029 {I15} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+0.68 {I10} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$227.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 227.71 {I6} (2003Go02) 
RI$1 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.14 {I17} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -5.6 {I+18-46} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.12 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I10} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$546.9 {I1} (1984Di03), 546.93 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$12 {I1} (1984Di03), 13.9 {I10} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.021 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I19} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+0.75 {I16} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1009.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 1009.7 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$33 {I1} (1984Di03), 37 {I3} (2003Go02) 
MR$other: -2.9 {I1} from 1984Di03 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I1} (1984Di03) A{-2}=-0.181 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I14} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+0.60 {I11} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$from 2003Go02 only 
$A{-2}=+0.00 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I12} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -2.6 {I+18-}|@ (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1147.1 {I1} (1984Di03), 1147.16 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$15 {I1} (1984Di03), 18.1 {I13} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I5} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.014 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I21} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.0 {I2} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$2583.0 {I1} (1984Di03), 2582.92 {I10} (2003Go02) 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.6 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I6} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1204.4 {I1} (1984Di03), 1203.6 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 1.1 {I2} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$2639.3 {I1} (1984Di03), 2639.39 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$23 {I1} (1984Di03), 26.4 {I19} (2003Go02) 
M$Q from |g(|q), M2 ruled out by RUL 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I9} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.276 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.082 {I15} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$364.0 {I1} (1984Di03), 363.88 {I4} (2003Go02) 
RI$7 {I1} (1984Di03), 5.1 {I4} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -4.7 {I+6-9} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$1343.4 {I1} (1984Di03), 1343.54 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$20 {I1} (1984Di03), 21.2 {I15} for the doublet in 2003Go02 
$A{-2}=+0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.234 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.074 {I17} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+3.3 {I+18-8} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$952.7 {I2} (1984Di03), 952.90 {I11} (2003Go02) 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.67 {I22} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -5 {I+2-9} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I9} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.2 {I+10-6} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$1415.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 1415.71 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$19 {I1} (1984Di03), 18.8 {I13} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.349 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.083 {I19} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+2.7 {I+14-7} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
E$1444.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 1444.86 {I2} (2003Go02) 
RI$27 {I1} (1984Di03), 28 {I2} (2003Go02) 
MR$others: -0.14 {I6} or -3.0 {I4} (1984Di03). 
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4} (1984Di03), A{-2}=-0.164 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I15} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.6 {I+5-3} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1495.5 {I1} (1984Di03), 1495.59 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$13 {I1} (1984Di03), 14.8 {I10} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -4.2 {I+4-5} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.183 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.048 {I17}, pol=+1.4 {I+5-3} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 683.9 {I1} (1984Di03), 683.65 {I7} (2003Go02). Placed by 2003Go02, unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.1 {I2} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -0.27 {I6} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$773.1 {I1} (1984Di03), 773.16 {I5} (2003Go02) 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.9 {I3} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -0.18 {I4} (2003Go02). Other: -2.0 {I+4-6} (1984Di03) 
$A{-2}=-0.42 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I7} (1984Di03), A{-2}=-0.40 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.2 {I+7-4} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1555.2 {I1} (1984Di03), 1555.25 {I4} (2003Go02) 
RI$6 {I1} (1984Di03), 6.6 {I5} (2003Go02) 
MR$other: 0.21 {I+4-3} from 1984Di03 
$A{-2}=+0.05 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+4 {I+7-2} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1151.0 {I2} (1984Di03), 1151.38 {I14} (2003Go02) 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.52 {I21} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I19} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1614.0 {I1} (1984Di03), 1614.08 {I3} (2003Go02) 
RI$19 {I2} (1984Di03), 18.9 {I13} (2003Go02) 
MR$others: -0.08 {I5} or 3.1 {I+6-5} (1984Di03). 
$A{-2}=+0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I4} (1984Di03), A{-2}=+0.255 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.063 {I19} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.4 {I+6-4} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1256.2 {I1} (1984Di03), 1256.25 {I11} (2003Go02) 
RI$1 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.49 {I22} (2003Go02) 
MR$or 1/|d=0.00 {I1} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I10} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$1264.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 1264.63 {I12} (2003Go02) 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.4 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.09 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I10} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$1727.0 {I1} (1984Di03), 1727.03 {I6} (2003Go02) 
RI$8 {I1} (1984Di03), 6.2 {I4} (2003Go02) 
MR$or +2.0 {I+5-3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (2003Go02) 
$POL=+1.5 {I+22-9} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$934.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 934.77 {I9} (2003Go02) 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.58 {I20} (2003Go02) 
MR$or +8 {I+6-3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1806.7 {I3} (1984Di03), 1806.80 {I18} (2003Go02) 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.02 {I16} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -28 {I+6-}|@ (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I9} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1358.6 {I1} (1984Di03), 1358.80 {I6} (2003Go02) 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.2 {I2} (2003Go02) 
MR$or -50 {I+40-600} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I7} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1821.2 {I3} (1984Di03), 1821.31 {I8} (2003Go02) 
RI$5 {I1} (1984Di03), 4.9 {I4} (2003Go02) 
MR$or +4.2 {I+7-6} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I5} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1068.2 {I1} (1984Di03), 1068.27 {I8} (2003Go02). It is unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 2.96 {I25} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I9} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1850.2 {I1} (1984Di03), 1850.30 {I10} (2003Go02). It is unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.2 {I2} (2003Go02) 
MR$assuming J=2 for 3286 level (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I7} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.17 in table 1 seems a misprint 
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I11} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1940.7 {I1} (1984Di03), 1940.80 {I9} (2003Go02). It is unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$6 {I1} (1984Di03), 4.4 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.47 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1481.3 {I1} (1984Di03), 1481.24 {I10} (2003Go02). It is unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$3 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.3 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I7} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1116.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 1116.66 {I8} (2003Go02). It is unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$4 {I1} (1984Di03), 3.3 {I3} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=-0.14 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I11} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$765.8 {I1} (1984Di03), 766.09 {I14} (2003Go02). It is unplaced in 1984Di03. 
RI$2 {I1} (1984Di03), 1.82 {I16} (2003Go02) 
MR$or +1.5 {I6} (2003Go02) 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I11} (2003Go02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Fr23. Others: 462.77 {I4} (1979Bo26), 462.79 {I7} (1974Ca02), 462.82 {I12} (1972Ac02). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0105 {I13} (1972Ac02) 
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I50} (1973Si33), A{-2}=+0.117 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I17} (1975Ba21) for 463-1436 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 112.60 {I13} (1974Ca02) and 112.44 {I10} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.83 (1972Ac02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 408.98 {I6} (1974Ca02) and 408.98 {I8} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.021 {I4} (1972Ac02) 
MR$1973Si33 report -0.85<|d<-0.05, 1975Ba21 report |d=0.05 {I+20-12} 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} (1973Si33), A{-2}=+0.211 {I37}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I40} (1975Ba21), A{-2}=+0.194 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I20} (1985Be04) for 409-1436 correlation; A{-2}=+0.192 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1985Be04) for 409-463 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 871.80 {I8} (1974Ca02) and 871.66 {I7} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0028 {I8} (1972Ac02) 
$A{-2}=+0.05 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I18} (1973Si33), A{-2}=+0.130 {I31}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I34} (1975Ba21), A{-2}=+0.126 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.006 {I30} (1985Be04), for 872-1436 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 212.32 {I8} (1974Ca02) and 212.38 {I10} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.21 {I5} (1972Ac02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 324.90 {I8} (1974Ca02) and 324.90 {I12} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.034 (1972Ac02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 138.10 {I6} (1974Ca02) and 138.02 {I10} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.40 {I9} (1972Ac02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 227.76 {I6} (1974Ca02) and 227.75 {I10} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.089 {I10} (1972Ac02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Bo26. Others: 546.94 {I7} (1974Ca02), 546.87 {I15} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0105 {I14} (1972Ac02) 
MR$1973Si33 report -0.06<|d<-0.015, 1975Ba21 report |d=0.10 {I3} 
$A{-2}=-0.107 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I40} (1973Si33), A{-2}=-0.053 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I25} (1975Ba21), A{-2}=-0.034 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I14} (1985Be04), for 547-1436 correlation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1009.78 {I8} (1974Ca02) and 1009.78 {I7} (1972Ac02) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0022 {I4} (1972Ac02) 
MR$1973Si33 report -0.015<|d<0.020, 1975Ba21 report 0.01 {I3} 
$A{-2}=-0.065 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I40} (1973Si33), A{-2}=-0.084 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I22} (1975Ba21), A{-2}=-0.096 {I32}, A{-4}=+0.014 {I45} (1985Be04), for 1010-1436 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=665.98 {I7}, |s=0.0053 {I3} (2007ChZX), but placed from a 1293.3 level, not known from any other study 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1047.74 {I5}, |s=0.0319 {I10} (2007ChZX). Note that relative intensity deduced from 2007ChZX is about a factor of 5 higher than that from 1991Bo47 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$725.334 {I27} (2001Lu16) 
$Ordering of the 768.5|g |) 726.3|g cascade has been reversed in the Erratum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$768.177 {I30} (2001Lu16) 
$Ordering of the 768.5|g |) 726.3|g cascade has been reversed in the Erratum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Fig. 4 of 2015St16 gives 820.9 |g as from the (3{++}) to 2{++}{-2} that does fit these levels but this placement (according to Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=7.4 {I7}, |a(L)exp=1.1 {I6} (1984Is08) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.2|*10{+2} {I+15-11} upper bound exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from analysis of L| x ray data (1982Ya04) 
M |a(K)exp=7.03 {i18} (1982Ya04). Others: 7.4 {i6} (1984Is08), 6.6 {i9} (1976Ot03) (normalized to |a(K)exp for standard |g's); |a(L)exp=1.1 {i6} (1984Is08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M L1 conversion is much stronger than L2 or L3 conversion. Balance of I(|g+ce) to and from 48.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1, D transition from (534|g)(589|g+658|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (2002Ur04) 
$B(E1)/B(E2)(495|g)=1.41|*10{+-6} {I8} fm{+-2} (2002Lu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Fig. 3 in Erratum to 2002Lu08. E|g=561.1 in Table I of Erratum seems a misprint 
E$561.63 {I9} in 2002Lu08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M K/L=5.2 (1973Kh05,1974KhZV), |g|g(|q) (1980Sc16) 
E from 1979Bo26 
RI I|g=27.2% {I27} if I|g=100 (1984So18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+(Q)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=9.0% {I9} if I|g=33 {I3} (1984So18); I|g=28.3 {I15} in 1974WrZY I|g(967):I|g(1326)=44.4 {I4}/55.6 {I4} (1990Ma25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$other: -0.25 or -2.4(4) from |g(|q) of 323.0-912.55 cascade 
$A{-2}=-0.172(20), A{-4}=+0.008(29) from |g(|q) of 323.0-912.55 cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(L)(exp)=107 {I21} and ce(L)/ce(M)|?5 in {+143}Cs |b{+-} Decay, after normalizing electron and |g-ray intensities using |a(K)(117|g, E2, theory)=0.747. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L)(exp)=107 {I21}, normalized to |a(K)(117|g, E2, theory)=0.741. ce(L)/ce(M) (theory)=5. 1985Ra20 reports ce(L)/ce(M)=8.9. However, evaluators have obtained ce(L)/ce(M)|?5 from the electron spectrum given in 1985Ra20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.136 {I40}, |a(L)exp=0.031 {I9} 
$|a(K)=0.1316 (M1),|a(K)=0.1445 (E2) 
RI I|g=12.6% {I19} (1984So18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(493.1|g)(343.1)(|q): A{-2}=+0.102 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.019 {I6} 
$(493.1|g)[343.1|g](117.2)(|q): A{-2}=+0.038 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(625.7|g)(493.1)(|q): A{-2}=+0.100 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.007 {I15}; negative sign of A{-2} in Table V of 2023Br7 is inconsistent with expected positive value, possibly a misprint in the paper. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(total)=0.26 {I3}, deduced from difference in relative intensities of the 431.5|g and 167.5|g with double gating on 504.6|g and 1030.7|g (2020Zh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+144}Ba Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (Dec 2000 update). 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=45.2 {I25} (stated in the text, 2021Ol03). 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=46 {I+6-5} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.169 {I16}, |a(M)exp=0.0074 {I8} (1986Ro17); |a(K)exp=0.170 {I51}, |a(L)exp=0.026 {I8} (1982Ra13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.107 {I20}, |a(L)exp=0.014 {I4} (1986Ro17); |a(K)exp=0.130 {I39}, |a(L)exp=0.020 {I6} (1982Ra13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. 
M |a(K)exp=0.92 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.128 {I12} (1986Ro17); |a(K)exp=0.79 {I24} |a(L)exp=0.14 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.033 {I10} (1982Ra13). Note that |d=2.0 {I3} (from |a(K)exp) is inconsistent with K/L data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g|g(|q), |a(K)exp=0.169 {I16}, |a(M)exp=0.0074 {I8} (1986Ro17); |a(K)exp=0.170 {I51}, |a(L)exp=0.026 {I8} (1982Ra13) 
RI if I(723|g,{+145}Ce |b decay)=59% {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |g|g(|q), ce data are consistent with E2: |a(K)exp=0.088 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.008 {I1} (1986Ro17), |a(K)exp=0.095 {I28} (1982Ra13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.011 {I12} if 455.23|g and 454.28|g are M1,E2; authors |a(K)exp=0.0011 is probably a typo 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.40 {I9} (from 2012Rz01: Phys. Rev. C 86, 044324) 
$Compiler's note: |d(E2/M1)=0.48 {I17}, deduced by compiler from ce data in 1982Ra13 (Z. Phys. A305, 359), 1986Ro17 and 2012Rz01, using BrIccMixing code. This value agrees with -0.40 {I9} from 2012Rz01. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.025 {I1}, B(E2)(W.u.)=220 {I+90-80} (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0368 {I+21-23}, B(E2)(W.u.)=28 {I+38-19} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$deduced by compiler from ce data in 1986Ro17 and 1982Ra13, reduced |h{+2} is 0.73, BrIccMixing code. Same value adopted in 2021Ol03. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.015 {I5}, B(E2)(W.u.)=140 {I+90-80} (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0150 {I+44-50}, B(E2)(W.u.)=140 {I+90-80} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$The ce data does not agree with any |d 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0099 {I17} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=750 {I130} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0150 {I+26-21} (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)=1140 {I+200-160} (If E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Compiler's note: |d(E2/M1)<0.6, deduced by compiler from ce data in 1986Ro17 and 1982Ra13 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0082 {I6} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=120 {I10} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0106 {I+31-36}, B(E2)(W.u.)<52 (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1) from |g|g(|q) data in 2012Rz01 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.018 {I2}, B(E2)(W.u.)=18 {I15} (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0176 {I10}, B(E2)(W.u.)=18 {I+12-10} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$E1 from ENSDF, based on ce data in 1986Ro17 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=1.45|*10{+-4} {I6} (2021Ol03) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=1.45|*10{+-4} {I5} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M$compiler's note: (M1) from K/L ratio in 1986Ro12 (compiler). E2 in ENSDF is incorrect 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=9.8|*10{+-4} {I3} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=95 {I3} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00976 {I34} if M1, (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=4.0|*10{+-4} {I5} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.5 {I3} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=4.01|*10{+-4} {I+34-36} (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)=2.46 {I+21-22} (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=3.3|*10{+-4} {I6} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.1 {I2} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=3.4|*10{+-4} {I5} (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)=1.11 {I+16-17} (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$From transition intensity balance at 416 level, relative I(|g+ce)=13.0, assuming no direct |b feeding to the 416 level. This suggests total conversion coefficient of 6.2 {I16} for relative I|g=1.8 {I4}. The relative intensities are from 1986Ro17 with I|g=100 for 175.36|g. Total |a(exp)=6.2 {I16} implies M1+E2, |d=0.25 {I4}. However, RUL(for E2)=300 gives |d<0.07. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>0.0038 for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.29 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>2.0|*10{+4} for pure E2 (2021Ol03). Compiler's note: B(E2)(W.u.) is |?60 times larger than RUL(for E2)=300 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=[E1] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.8|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0015 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>13.6 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=[E1] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>2.2|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0017 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>12 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=[E1] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.8|*10{+-6} for pure E1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.7 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Compiler's note: M1+E2 according to data in the thesis 1987RoZW; also see Fig. 3 in 1986Ro17 where K-conversion line of 454|g is prominent, not likely E1. But it should be noted that 454|g is a doublet, and authors of 1986Ro17 and 1987RoZW have different values of measured conversion coefficients listed. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.3|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0012 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>3.4 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.8|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0015 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>17.6 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0012 (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)>15 (if E2) (compiler) 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=[M1,E2] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.3|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0011 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>7.3 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>9.8|*10{+-4} (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)>6.4 (if E2) (compiler) 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=[M1+E2] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.6|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0014 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>3.4 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0014 (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)>3.3 (if E2) (compiler) 
$Compiler's note: |DJ|p require mult=[M1+E2] 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0031 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>1.8 for pure E2 (2021Ol03). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0016 (if M1), B(E2)(W.u.)>18 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ (185.4|g)(164.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.405 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.083 {I31} 
$ (185.4|g)(276.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.172 {I31}, A{-4}=+0.030 {I41} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ (364.4|g)(164.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.353 {I34}, A{-4}=-0.089 {I42} 
$ (364.4|g)(276.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.113 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.021 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ (248.6|g)(109.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.100 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.021 {I21} 
$ (248.6|g)(154.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.058 {I13}, A{-4}=0.000 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$second solution is |d=-2.9 {I6}, indicating dominant E2, which is not supported by ce and |g|g(|q) data in 2012Rz01 (Phys. Rev. C 86, 044324). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$average of -0.21 {I3} from (185.3|g)(277.1)(|q) and -0.19 {I3} from (154.6|g)(185.3)(|q) 
$(185.3|g)(277.1)(|q): A{-2}=-0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$(248.4|g)(109.6)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} 
$(248.4|g)(154.6)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Final level record added Feb 25, 2021 by B. Singh 
E$level energy difference gives 1346.64 keV; this |g was not used for least-square fitting. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1597.80 {I38} I|g=4.00 {I34} in coin with 181|g (1980Sc16); supported by 1598.7 {I4} I|g=2.3 {I6} from 1780 keV level (2016Mi02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Observed by 1978BlZY with E|g=1599.1, I|g=1.4 and placed from the 1600 keV level; placement from the 1780.0 keV level is from 2016Mi02, supported by coin in 1980Sc16. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Observed by 1978BlZY with I|g=1.4, placed by 2016Mi02. Part of I|g may belong to the transition from 2162.1 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Observed by 1978BlZY with I|g=1.4, placed by 2016Mi02. Part of I|g may belong to the transition from 1979.9 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
DCO=1.11 {I2}; DCO=1.10 {I7} from |g|g|g; pol=0.21 {I27}. In table 1 of 1997Ur01 this |g is placed as going from 1944.9 keV level; it is obviously a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$assumed by the evaluators: the value 714.3 is a misprint in fig. 1 2001Ha14, the energy difference between levels is 741.36 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.) deduced from E3 matrix element from g.s., 0+ = 0.65 eb{+3/2} {I+14-20} 
RI$deduced by compiler from B(E3)|^, known half-life of 3- level, and known |g-ray branching ratios. Note that ground-state transition of 821 keV, as reported with a relative branching ratio of 24 in July 2016 evaluation in the ENSDF database, was not seen by 2017Bu07, consistent with its non-observation in several previous studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$RUL (excludes |DJ |> 2) and |D|p=no (excludes E1) (2005Sy01, |b{+-} decay); very small E2 admixture is possible 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 from K/L ratio in |b{+-} decay (1987ScZG) and |a(K)exp in {+248}Cm SF decay (2013Rz01). 
$|a(K)exp=1.1 {I2} (2013Rz01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance considerations of 90.7 --> 80.8 cascade, where 90.7|g is E2 in {+248}Cm SF decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition is definitely not observed in 2013Rz01 ({+248}Cm SF decay), only an upper limit of 0.7% of I(251|g) is given (adopted here) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$% branching=9.6; I|g=45 {I4} in 1981ScZM 
EKC$7.2 {I8} (2005Sy01) deduced from sum of coincidence spectra gated by the 541, 582, 674, 741 and 1193 transitions. 
M$|a(K)exp gives M1, E2 or M1+E2; however, pure E2 is excluded from RUL, although very small E2 admixture is possible. This excludes E1 from 1981ScZM 
CC$for pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$% branching=1.2; I|g deduced assuming 85.4 transition is M1 
M$M1 from 2005Sy01 based on RUL (that excludes |DJ |> 2) and |D|p=no (that excludes E1); 2005Sy01 do not exclude a very small E2 admixture 
CC$for pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$%|g-branching=31.4; deduced assuming mult(39.2|g)=M1 
M$M1 from 1981ScZM based on K/L ratio; 2005Sy01 exclude E2 based on RUL, but do not exclude a very small E2 admixture. 
CC$for pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=18 {I2} in 1981ScZM 
M$M1 reported in 1981ScZM but I(|g+ce) reported in that paper was calculated with |a for E2. K/L ratio in 1987ScZG agrees with E2+M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$from K/L ratio, E1 from 1981ScZM but M1,E2 from 1987ScZG; since 2005Sy01 do not list this relatively intense |g (because of possible contamination from {+147}La), no mult is adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$E2 from K/L ratios from 1981ScZM; however, |g not listed by 2005Sy01 (possible contamination from {+147}La), so mult not adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
ECC$0.08 {I2} from intensity balances (2005Sy01) 
M$M1+E2 from 1981ScZM; M1, E2, or M1+E2 2005Sy01, |a(exp); E1 from 1987ScZG (1981ScZM and 1987ScZG from K/L ratios) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$M1 from 1981ScZM, E2 from 1987ScZG (both from K/L ratios); however, |g not listed by 2005Sy01 (possible contamination from {+147}La) so mult not adopted here 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q,E2 from angular correlation 
$(308.7|g)(153.4|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-quadrupole cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$consistent with stretched Q transition from angular correlation of 121.4-239.9-keV cascade, (E2) from being a prompt decay (2013Rz01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from intensity balance considerations of 90.7 --> 80.8 cascade, where 90.7|g is assumed E2 from its stretched quadrupole character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$unstretched |DJ=0, D transition 
$(239.9|g)[90.7|g](121.4|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-unstretched (|DJ=0) dipole for 239 --> 121 cascade with intermediate 90.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$(239.9|g)[90.7|g](174.6|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-dipole for 239 --> 174 cascade with intermediate 90.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$transition is definitely not observed in 2013Rz01, only an upper limit of 0.7% of I(251|g) is given (adopted here) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q,E2 based on angular correlation and |a(K)exp; 
$|a(K)exp=2.4 {i4} (2013Rz01) 
$(90.7|g)(250.6|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-dipole cascade 
$1996Jo14 found M1+E2 based on |a(exp) and |a(K)exp but values are not incompatible with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(308.7|g)(153.4|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-quadrupole cascade 
$(308.7|g)(128.8|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-dipole cascade 
$(308.7|g)(238.6|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-quadrupole cascade 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(239.9|g)(90.7|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-quadrupole cascade 
$(239.9|g)[90.7|g](250.6|g)(|q) consistent with quadrupole-dipole for 239 --> 250 cascade with intermediate 90.7|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$observed by 2018Li06 in the {+148}Ba |b-gated |g spectrum (recorded in the first 500 ms relative to proton pulse) having a similar time distribution (T{-1/2}=158 ms {I6}) as the 141.6|g from {+148}Ba |b{+-} decay (T{-1/2}=151 ms {I1}), which excluded direct population from {+147}Cs |b{+-} (T{-1/2}=229.5 ms {I10}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$value of 595.7 in level-scheme Fig. 7 of 2017Li06 seems a misprint, as the level-energy difference suggests. Value listed here is from e-mail reply from the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) value obtained by compiler. B(E2)(W.u.)=110 {I4} in 2018Li06 corresponds to T{-1/2}=3.6 ns {I1} for the 101.1 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 239.4 {I2} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 239.5 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 324.8 {I2} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 324.9 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 267.0 {I2} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 267.1 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 506.1 {I3} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 506.6 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 55 {I18} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 292.4 {I2} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 292.1 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 559.6 {I4} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 559.3 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 80 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 314.3 {I2} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 314.4 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I50} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 606.2 {I4} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 606.3 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I50} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 333.5 {I2} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 333.6 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 50 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 647.6 {I4} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 647.8 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 349.5 {I3} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 349.7 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 80 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 683.4 {I4} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 682.6 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I30} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 359.8 {I3} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 360.1 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I40} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 709.4 {I4} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 709.2 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I40} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 359.8 {I3} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 359.5 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I40} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 720.0 {I4} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) and 719.7 {I2} from ({+40}Ca,2|ap|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I40} from ({+34}S,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ Positive sign of A{-4} in Table I in 2002Ch38 is a type error. It was corrected by the author of {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 via per e-mail from one of the authors (E. Paul) of 2002Ch38 see also {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 
$R=1.10 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$E|g=966.6 quoted in the Table VI of 2002Ch38 is incorrect. It was corrected by the author of {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 via per e-mail from one of the authors (E. Paul) of 2002Ch38 see also {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$E|g=978.0 quoted in Table VI of 2002Ch38 is incorrect. It was corrected by the author of {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 via per e-mail from one of the authors (E. Paul) of 2002Ch38 see also {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1204 quoted in figure 2 of 2002Ch38 is a misprint. It was corrected by the author of {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 via per e-mail from one of the authors (E. Paul) of 2002Ch38 see also {+64}Zn({+64}Zn,3pn|g):XUNDL-1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M From DCO in {+112}Sn({+16}O,2n|g) and relevant levels 
RI I|g(1232)/I|g(409)=1.33 {I13} in {+112}Sn({+16}O,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI I|g(1328)/I|g(532)=0.40 {I6} in {+112}Sn({+16}O,2np|g) 
M From DCO in {+112}Sn({+16}O,2n|g) and relevant levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E From 1999Ca21 
M$From measured |a. 
$|a(K)exp=2.5 {I15}, |a(L)exp=8 {I3}, |a(M)exp=2.4 {I10}, L/K=3.2 {I7}, M/K=1.0 {I7} (1999Ca21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI Calculated from I(384)/I(480)=0.24 {I6} and I(480)/I(1169)=0.33 {I5} by evaluators 
DCO=0.20 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=15 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.3 {I2} (2005Ii01) 
$|a(exp) value deduced from intensity balance between the 58.5 and 397.6 transitions by using the cascade relation between these transitions. The intensities used to do so were obtained from spectrum gated on 367.0 |g ray where 2005Ii01 assume the multipolarity of the 397.6 transition to be M1 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$176.4 and 177.5 form a doublet structure. 
$|a(K)exp=0.015 {I5} (2005Ii01), for the doublet with undivided intensities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.016 {I6} (2005Ii01) 
RI$Derived by subtracting out daughter ({+127}La) contamination; electromagnetic mass-separation of reaction products was not able to remove {+127}La impurities from the beam. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$In 2001Xi01 the strong 371.7 keV |g is considered as a single |g, in 1997Gi08 it is resolved to 370.7 and 372.2 keV |g rays in |g|g coin. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Evaluators consider the placement of the 556.0 keV |g tentative due to lack of supporting |g|g coin or other |g from the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$seen in ({+36}S,3np|g) only. Placement treated as uncertain (evaluator) since no such |g shown by 1989Go04 in this band; instead, a 1013.9|g is shown from another band member 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3}. Note that negative A{-4} is not allowed for a |DJ=1 transition (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3}. Note that negative A{-4} is not allowed for a |DJ=1 transition (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4}. Note that negative A{-4} is not allowed for a |DJ=1 transition (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I3}. Note that negative A{-4} is not allowed for a |DJ=1 transition (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$from e-mail reply of August 2, 2014 from Manuela Ionescu-Bujor; I|g=7.5 in Table I of 2014Io01 is a misprint 
$R(ADO)=0.97 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance and assumed multipolarities of relevant transitions; value of I|g=11.8 is from e-mail reply of August 2, 2014 from Manuela Ionescu-Bujor; I|g=15 in Table I of 2014Io01 is a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$R(ADO)=0.85 {I8} 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I2} in quadrupole interaction experiment is consistent |DJ=1, dipole transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. Uncertainty of 0.2 keV in 2014Io01 
RI$from intensity balance and assumed multipolarities of relevant transitions; value of I|g=11.8 is from e-mail reply of August 2, 2014 from Manuela Ionescu-Bujor; I|g=15 in Table I of 2014Io01 is a misprint 
$B(E1)(W.u.) deduced by compiler 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Io01 
M$from |a(exp) (2014Io01), by assuming 137.0- and 118.0-keV transitions as M1 and the 72.4-keV transition as E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$R(ADO)=1.28 {I17} 
M$from |a(exp), assuming 137.0- and 118.0-keV transitions as M1 and the 72.4-keV transition as E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$R(ADO)=0.87 {I14} 
M$from |a(exp) (2014Io01), assuming 137.0- and 118.0-keV transitions as M1 and the 72.4-keV transition as E1; dipole multipolarity from R(ADO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Io01 
M$from |a(exp) (2014Io01), assuming 137.0- and 118.0-keV transitions as M1 and the 72.4-keV transition as E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g was not seen by 2020IoAA, but discussed in the text and shown in their level-scheme Fig. 3 as tentative 1036|g. The E|g and I|g given here are from, the latter deduced by compiler based on I|g(533.1) and I|g(1034.4), branching ratio given in 1989Go06: Jour Phys. G15, 671. Note that level-energy difference gives 1036.1 {I16}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 43 {I9} (1973De25) and 45 {I5} (1996Ge12) 
MR$from 1973De25 
M$from 1973De25. M1 from comparison to RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=185.58 {I19} 
M$D,E2 from comparison to RUL 
RI$from 1983ViZU, I|g|?1 from 1996Ge12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1983ViZU. I|g=23.2 {I18} from 1996Ge12 
M$from A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.60 {I6}, A{-4}/A{-0}=+0.10 {I6} from {+116}Cd({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=743.24 {I5} 
RI$main part of intensity relates to 5-min {+131}Ce decay (1983ViZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$nonstretched |DJ=0 or |DJ=2 |g (decay pattern supports |DJ=0); |g(|q): A{-2}=+0.38 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$intensity may be too high in view of <8 in ({+14}N,4n|g) E=45 MeV; and intensity much weaker than that for 386|g as in level-scheme figure of 2003Ku12 in ({+14}N,4n|g) E=60 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
RI$ from intensity balance at 135.8 level. Other: <0.2 (1969Ge11) 
M$ from K:L1:L2:L3:M=<50:82 {I12}:12 {I2}:130 {I20}:60 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
RI$ from I(|g+ce)(188.5)/I(|g+ce)(135.8)|?0.04 (1972Ha41). Other: <1 (1969Ge11) 
M$ from K:L3:M=4.5 {I7}:3.0 {I5}:2.5 {I4}; L2 and L3 are partially resolved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
RI$deduced (by evaluators) from intensity balance. I|g=7 in 2003Ti02 is in error since the authors assumed |a|?15. In an E-mail reply from J. Timar on March 26, 2003, it was confirmed that the the photon intensity should be |?30. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$intensity divided based on I|g(160.9)/I|g(278.6)=0.33 {I6} (2003Ti02) 
A{-2}=-0.33 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$in "adopted levels, gammas" this transition with mult=(M1) feeds an (8+) level, not the 670.0, (7+) level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=91 {I5}. Intensity divided based on intensity balance and corresponding intensities in ({+13}C,4n|g) 
A{-2}=-0.392 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.026 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$140 {I4} for 293.6+293.5. Intensity divided by the evaluators based on intensity balances 
DCO=0.46 {I6} (for 293.6+293.5) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$L1:L2:L3=8.6 {I8}:0.90 {I9}:0.24 {I3} (1984Gr30) 
MR$calculated by evaluators from M1+(0.32 {I+14-18})%E2 (1984Gr30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$ A{-2}=-0.13 {I8}, A{-4}|?0.0. Mult.=D+Q from |g(|q) measurement; D ruled out from placement in level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
RI$for the 913.7+914.4 |g's 
$A{-2}=+0.24 {I7}, A{-4}|?0.0 
E$in 1982Mo26, 913.5 {I2} |g-ray from E=3363, J=(27/2) level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; the level energy difference is equal to 443.94 {I3} keV 
EKC$for undivided line; I|g=59 {I2} 
M$|a(K)exp for two unresolved |g-rays (from 979 and 541 states) is consistent with mult=E2; multipolarity of E2 for each |g does not conflict with the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$|DE is assigned by evaluators. I(|g+ce)=4.9 {I6} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition with this energy de-excites the 1218.9 keV state also. I(|g+ce)=21 {I4} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M,RI$from placement in the level scheme mult.=E1. I|g is calculated according to |a(K) and ce(K) by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from ce(K) and |a(K) if M1, E2 
E$poor fit; the level energy difference is equal to 295.74 {I6} keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$for undivided line; I|g=59 {I2} 
M$|a(K)exp for two unresolved |g-rays (from 979 and 541 states) is consistent with mult=E2; multipolarity of E2 for each |g do not conflicted with the level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition with this energy de-excites the 765.38 keV state also. I(|g+ce)=21 {I4} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from ce(K)=2.5 {I5} and |a(K)exp=0.00088 {I18} (calculated by evaluators) values for the 1152.05|g+1154.68|g, it can be deduced that one of the two transitions should be of mult=E1 and the other of mult=E2,M1. If mult(1154|g)=(M1,E2) according to decay pattern then mult(1152|g)=(E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$deduced by evaluators from ce spectrum (fig. 2) of 1978He16 as Ice(K)(1720)|<Ice(K)(1664) and Ice(K)(1769) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$in 1978He16, this transition de-excites the 1311 level as uncertain, corresponding level energy difference is equal to 265.23 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; the level energy difference is equal to 1466.49 {I9} 
RI$I(|g+ce)=18.9 {I8} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$in table 1 (1978He16) this transition was placed tentatively from the 765 keV level, but with poor energy fit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; the level energy difference is equal to 1091.25 {I7} keV 
RI$I(|g+ce)=31 {I2} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16); |DI|g assigned by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; the level energy difference is equal to 1500.58 {I5} keV 
RI$I(|g+ce)=123 {I3} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$from Table I (1978He16); in the {+133}La level scheme (Fig.3) E=1219.7 
RI$I(|g+ce)=13.5 {I10} is divided on the basis of coincidence data (1978He16) 
EKC$ calculated by evaluators assuming mult.=(M1+E2) for 1128.0-keV |g placed between levels with J=(9/2)- and J=7/2-, and data from 1978He16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; the level energy difference is equal to 1154.02 {I6} keV 
M$see comment on 1152|g from 1806.6 keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$from placement in level scheme; mult=E1 from |a(K)exp conflicts with placement. As |a(K)exp value for 834|g is more precise than |a(K)exp for 1664|g, it is reasonable to assume there is an error in the latter or that the placement of the 1664|g is different 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=29.0 20, CEL1=3.6 2, CEL2=0.49 3, CEL3=0.31 3 
|a(K)exp=0.59 {I5}, |a(L1)exp=0.073 {I7}, |a(L2)exp=0.0099 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.0062 {I7} 
PENETRATION PARAMETER LAMBDA(M1)=2.5 50 (1975Mo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from simultaneous fitting of |a(K)exp, |a(L3)exp and K/L2 (1975Mo12) with |a(K)exp=1.26 {I9}, |a(L2)exp=0.112 {I9}, |a(L3)exp=0.118 {I10} 
CEK=23.3 15, CEL2=2.09 15, CEL3=2.18 15 
AVERAGE CE'S GIVE EKC=1.46 9, EL2C=0.130 10, EL3C=0.136 10 IN AGREEMENT WITH VALUES FROM 1975Mo12 
E$86.87 {I5} (1974Na11) 
Penetration parameter |l(M1)=14.5 {I55} (1975Mo12). Other: 1973Mo22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=36.7 15 
|a(K)exp=0.124 {I9}; L1/L2=9.7 {I10}, L1/L3=16.9 {I25}, L2/L3=1.74 {I30} (1974Na11); K/L=6.9 {I10}, K/M=32 {I7} (1975He21) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1972Zh03,1981BuZW) and subshell ratios 
PENETRATION PARAMETER LAMBDA(M1)=2.5 35 (1975Mo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=12.0 15, CEL1=1.8 4, CEL2=0.42 11 
E$from 1974Na11. E|g=59.03 {I5} (1975He21) 
|a(K)exp=3.8 {I6}, |a(L1)exp=0.55 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.13 {I3} 
MR$from subshell ratios (1981Ab08). |d <0.05 from L1/L2>11 (1974Na11) 
RI$from 1981Ab08. I|g=0.055 {I9} (1975He21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=100.0 20 
L1/L2=11.1 {I6}, L1/L3=22.4 {I20}, L2/L3=2.0 {I3} (1974Na11); K/L=7.9 {I9}, K/M=25 {I3} (1975He21) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1972Zh03,1981BuZW) and subshell ratios 
PENETRATION PARAMETER LAMBDA(M1)=4 5 (1975Mo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Na11. E|g=34.52 {I3} (1975He21) 
CEL=190 15 
|a(L)exp=3.0 {I3}; L1/L2=11.5 {I8}, L1/L3=39 {I12}, L2/L3=3.4 {I11} (1974Na11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CEK=35.0 7 
|a(K)exp=0.039 {I1}; L1/L2=2.56 {I12}, L1/L3=3.23 {I12}, L2/L3=1.26 {I5} (1974Na11); K/L=5.1 {I7}, K/M=20 {I3} (1975He21) 
M$from subshell ratios, |d(E2/M1)>5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.049 11 
|a(K)exp=0.012 {I3} 
RI$ 10% UNCERTAINTY ASSIGNED BY EVALUATOR 
RI$ RI(459.08G+459.1G)=0.31 3 IN SINGLES (1975He11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=8.4 4, CEL1=1.23 14, CEL2=0.21 4, CEL3 AP 0.11 
|a(K)exp=0.58 {I5}, |a(L1)exp=0.087 {I10}, |a(L2)exp=0.015 {I3}, |a(L3)exp|?0.008; L1/L2=10.5 {I40} (1974Na11) 
PENETRATION PARAMETER LAMBDA(M1)=5 9 (1975Mo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=6.1 3, CEL=0.78 7, CEM=0.15 2 
|a(K)exp=0.0117 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.00150 {I14}, |a(M)exp=0.00029 {I4} 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1981BuZW) and |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
CEK=0.07 2 
MR$|a(K)exp=0.054 {I20} gives |d(M2/E1)=0.2 {I1}. |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) indicates |DJ=1, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=31.5 15, CEL1=3.7 4, CEL2=0.40 7, CEL3=0.10 4 
|a(K)exp=1.42 {I9}, |a(L1)exp=0.166 {I17}, |a(L2)exp=0.018 {I3}, |a(L3)exp=0.0045 {I18} 
PENETRATION PARAMETER LAMBDA(M1)=2.5 45 (1975Mo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CEK=3.6 3 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0091 {I8} gives |d(E2/M1)<0.6 (assuming no E0), |DJ|p requires M1 
(572|g)(300|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.005 {I17} (1974Na11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.49 7 
|a(K)exp=0.0043 {I6}. K/L=7.1 {I10}, K/M=49 {I20} (1975He21) 
M$from |g|g(|q) and |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
CEK LT 0.007 
M$|a(K)exp<0.003 gives D,E2; but adopted |D|p requires M1,E2 
RI$ RI(727.9G+727.1G+727.0G+728.5G)=0.25 3 IN SINGLES (1975He11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CEK=0.21 3, CEL=0.022 5 
|a(K)exp=0.0034 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.00036 {I8} 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1981BuZW) and |a(exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CEK=0.072 3, CEL=0.0075 9, CEM=0.0021 5 
|a(K)exp=0.00173 {I10}, |a(L)exp=0.00018 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.000038 {I9} 
MR$-0.12 {I3} if J=1/2 or +0.49 {I5} if J=3/2 from |g|g(|q) (1981BuZW). ce data support M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
CEK=0.0014 3 
|a(K)exp=0.0005 {I1} gives E2 but somewhat uncertain due to discrepant mult for 1767|g from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
A2=+0.17 5 (1977Ch23) 
M$|DJ=0, dipole from A{-2}=+0.15 {I2} (1973Le09), R(DCO)=1.09. These data are also consistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole 
375.6-379.4 CASCADE IS REVERSED IN 1973Le09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
Placement from 1990XuZW. 1977Ch23 suggested from a 1530 level to 786 level 
A{-2}=-0.53 {I20} (1977Ch23), R(DCO)=0.32 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
A2=+0.13 5 (1977Ch23) 
A{-2}=+0.14 {I2} (1973Le09). R(DCO)=1.11 
375.6-379.4 cascade is reversed in 1973Le09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.24 {I15} (1977Ch23), R(DCO)=0.67 is much too low than |?1 expected for |DJ=2,Q assigned by 1990XuZW 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ DCO seems too large to be consistent with stretched dipole (compilers' note). In e-mail reply from R. Garg, July 29, 2013, it is suggested that DCO values for low-energy transitions (122-244 keV) may not be reliable due to efficiency problems. 
$ POL=+0.28 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ DCO is too large for stretched quadrupole (compilers' note). In e-mail reply from R. Garg, July 29, 2013, it is suggested that DCO value for this weak transition may be ignored 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$B(M4) transition strength significantly exceeds the RUL, suggesting that either placement is incorrect, or there are additional, highly converted, unobserved, low-energy transitions depopulating the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=100 
M$R(asym)=1.7 {I2}, R(IPDCO)=-0.02 {I2} (2005Bh06). Other: E1 is assigned from R(DCO)=1.09 {I4} in 2005Zh16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=91.3 {I9} 
M$R(asym)=1.4 {I2}, R(IPDCO)=+0.05 {I3} (2005Bh06). Other: D from R(DCO)=1.19 {I5} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=86.2 {I8} 
M$R(asym)=1.35 {I18}, R(IPDCO)=-0.09 {I12} (2005Bh06). Other: D+Q from R(DCO)=1.19 {I6} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=11.2 {I5} 
M$R(asym)=1.8 {I4}, R(IPDCO)=-0.05 {I6} (2005Bh06). Other: D+Q from R(DCO)=1.42 {I9} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g'=70.4 {I8} 
M$R(asym)=1.43 {I19}, R(IPDCO)=0 (2005Bh06). Other: D+Q from R(DCO)=1.09 {I6} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g'=35.7 {I2} 
M$D from R(DCO)=1.14 {7} in 2005Zh16 is in disagreement with |DJ=2 transition from Adopted Levels. 
E$placement from 2005Zh16, however, this would result in a strong M2 transition as thus, is not included in the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=17.1 {I7} 
E$Initial level energy for this transition taken from figure 8 of 2005Bh06; 2372.3 listed in authors' table 1 seems a misprint. 
M$R(DCO)=1.27 {I9} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Initial level energy for this transition taken from figure 8 of 2005Bh06; 2371.5 listed in authors' table 1 seems a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g'=16.2 {I7} 
M$D+Q from R(DCO)=1.09 {I8} in 2005Zh16 is in disagreement with adopted placement as |DJ=2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g'=4.5 {I3} 
M$R(asym)=0.8 {I3}, R(IPDCO)=+0.4 {I3} (2005Bh06). Other: D+Q from R(DCO)=1.14 {I10} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g'=7.5 {I5} 
E$proposed by 2005Zh16, however, as this would result in a |DJ=3, |D|p=no transition, the transition is not included in the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.6 {I1} 
M$R(asym)=0.97 {I21}, R(IPDCO)=+0.06 {I19} (2005Bh06). Other: D+Q from R(DCO)=1.47 {I30} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=14.7 {I6} 
M$R(asym)=1.8 {I3}, R(IPDCO)=-0.32 {I15} (2005Bh06). Other: D from R(DCO)=1.13 {I8} (2005Zh16). 
E$placement from 2005Zh16. Ordering of the 279.8|g-335.3|g cascade is reversed in 2005Bh06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=4.5 {I2} 
M$R(asym)=1.58 {I25}, R(IPDCO)=+0.06 {I5} (2005Bh06). Other: D from R(DCO)=1.12 {I9} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g'=3.0 {I3} 
M$R(asym)=1.1 {I4}, R(IPDCO)=-0.2 {I1} (2005Bh06). Other: Q from R(DCO)=0.88 {I11} (2005Zh16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$R(asym)=1.7 {I3}, R(IPDCO)=-0.8 {I3} (2005Bh06). Other: D from R(DCO)=1.10 {I9} (2005Zh16). 
E$placement from 2005Zh16. Ordering of the 279.8|g-335.3|g cascade is reversed in 2005Bh06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g'=2.4 {I2} 
M$R(asym)=1.4 {I7} (2005Bh06), R(IPDCO)=-0.3 {I2} (2005Bh06). Other: D from R(DCO)=1.06 {I12} (2005Zh16). 
E$placement from 2005Zh16. The ordering of 412|g-483|g cascade is reversed in 2005Bh06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g'=2.1 {I3} 
M$R(DCO)=1.23 {I20} (2005Zh16). 
E$placement from 2005Zh16. The ordering of 412|g-483|g cascade is reversed in 2005Bh06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$contaminated by K x-ray line of La. 
M$from |a(exp) (1985Mo01). 
CC$estimated by assuming that the total intensity of the 33.5|g should be less than the 95.7|g (1985Mo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
CC$from x-ray intensity off-beam spectra, contribution from 95.7|g assuming M1 multipolarity is subtracted (1985Mo01). 
E,RI$contaminated by x-ray lines of Pb; intensity estimated from coincidence spectrum 
M$from |a(exp) (1985Mo01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I(|g+ce)=97.83% {I8} and |a=117.6 {I24}. 
TI$From |g-ray intensity balance and assumption of no |e branch to ground state 
M M1:M2:M3=23.4 {I16}:2.87 {I24}:1 (1975Mo12), M1:M2:M3:M4+= 100:10 {I1}:2.6 {I7}:0.50 {I15}, |d<0.008 (1975ArYT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M M1:M2:M3=23.4 {I16}:2.87 {I24}:1 (1975Mo12); M1:M2:M3:M4+= 100:10 {I1}:2.6 {I7}:0.50 {I15}, |d<0.008 (1975ArYT) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$ from level-energy deduced from the fitting of level-scheme through cascade and crossover transitions. E|g=10.553 {I7} implied in 2012To09 
RI$ deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a=119.4 {I17}. 
TI$deduced by the compiler from |e+|b{++} feeding of 97.84% {I8} to 10.56 level, normalization factor of 0.0168 {I6}, |g-ray intensity balance, and assumption of no |e branch to ground state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$ from level-energy deduced from the fitting of level-scheme through cascade and crossover transitions in the decay of 9.11-h decay of {+137}Ce. E|g=10.553 {I7} implied in 2012To09 
RI$ deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a=119.4 {I17}. 
TI$deduced by the compiler from intensity balance at 10.56 level, assuming no |e branch to this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 738.8 {I2} from (p,n|g) and 739.2 {I5} from ({+12}C,F|g). 
M$proposed by 2014As02 in ({+12}C,F|g) based on transition energy and T{-1/2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
M$proposed by 2014As02 based on transition energy and T{-1/2} 
$Weak intensity probably due to the half-life of its parent level long enough to lower its relative intensity (2014As02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Intensity is large but undetermined since it is unresolved from K{-|a} x rays of uranium which are in coincidence with |g rays from fission fragments (2014As02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
CC$based on |a(K)(exp)=0.2146 {I10} (recommended by 1985HaZA from several experimental values, see {+139}Ce |e decay). |a(L)(exp)=0.0289 {I12} (1976Ha11). Corresponding value from BrIcc code is 0.261 {I4} 
MR$+0.034 {I34} from |e decay. <0.160 {I6} from adopted J|p, T{-1/2}, and |a and B(E2)|^ in Coul. ex. 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<2 from |d(E2/M1)=0.034 {I34} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from |b{+-} decay. Others: 72.0 {I17} in Coulomb. ex. and 76 {I9} in (n,n'|g) 
MR$-0.28 {I6} or -2.3 {I5} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)(5/2+)=3.7 {I13} from B(E2)|^ in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.29 {I3} or -2.2 {I2} for J(1578)=5/2, -0.17 {I2} or +1.6 {I2} for J(1578)=7/2 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=18.4 {I16} for J(1578)=5/2, B(E2)(W.u.)=13.8 {I12} for J(1578)=7/2 from B(E2)|^ in Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1999Al12 (Intrinsic Ge-LEPS); recommended by 2000He14). 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(exp). Measured value=79.95% {I6} (1982RuZV, 4|p|g pc) 
M$from |a(exp) values 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.034 {I34} from 1963Ha07 ((|g,|q,t) and polarization). Others: -0.06 (1961Kn02), <0.02 (1962Gr17) 
CC$recommended value from 1985HaZA based on 0.2514 {I11} (1962Ta03), 0.254 {I6} (1971Ar43), 0.251 {I2} (1975Pl06), 0.252 {I5} (1976Ha11), and 0.2159 {I10} (1977Sc38). |a=0.2446 {I12} (1973LeZO,1973Le29) discarded by 1985HaZA. Theory: |a(M1)=0.261 (BrIcc, 2008Ki07) 
EKC$recommended value based on 0.2148 {I12} (1962Ta03), 0.214 {I5} (1975Mo12. Combination of their |a(K)exp=0.207 {I9} and |a(exp)=0.254 {I6} (1971Ar43)), 0.214 {I2} (1975Pl06), and 0.2152 {I33} (1976Ha11). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.223 {I4} (BrIcc, 2008Ki07). Other: see 1985HaZA. 
K/L+$other: 7.4 {I2} (1965Ge04) 
$K/M+=28 {I1}. L1:L2:L3::1:0.072 {I3}:0.016 {I1} (1965Ge04) 
$Double K-shell ionization probability=6.0|*10{+-5} {I14} (1987Sc30. K| x ray-K| x ray coin; Ge,NaI). See also comment on |e(to 166). 
$|G{-invisible axion}/|G{-|g}<1.21|*10{+-6} (1993Mi20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
CC$from {+139}Ce |e decay based on experimental values. Corresponding value from BrIcc code is 0.261 {I4} 
E$from 1999Al12 in {+139}Ce |e decay. Others: 165.825 {I20} (2012Da04), 165.85 {I1} (2012Da17), 165.96 {I5} in table 1 but 165.85 in level-scheme figure 5 of 2001Za08, 165.84 (1986Fa08), 165.85 from 1968Hi13 who quote it from thesis by Baer (1967), measurement using curved-crystal spectrometer 
RI$from I|g(166|g)/I|g(1420|g)=100.0 {I10}/1.100 {I13} (1980Ge04) and I|g(1420)=100. Others: 9370 {I100} (2012Da04), 9473 {I370} (2012Da17), 8335 {I149} (2001Za08), 7300 (1986Fa08), 9090 {I150} (1980Ge04), 7300 {I730} (1969Be15), 6230 {I900} (1968Hi13). 
$%I|g=23.76 {I5} (1980Ge04) 
$ Measured I(K x-ray)/I(165.9|g)=0.2414 {I8} (2008Ni02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1053.14 {I5} (2012Da17), 1053.83 {I8} (2001Za08), 1052.9 (1986Fa08), 1053.1 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.273 {I13} (2012Da04), 0.276 {I10} (2012Da17), 0.1968 {I6} (2001Za08), 0.12 (1986Fa08), 0.197 {I20} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1219.03 {I1} (2012Da17), 1218.81 {I15} (2001Za08), 1219.1 (1986Fa08), 1218.8 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=1.91 {I2} (2012Da04), 1.83 {I2} (2012Da17), 1.7676 {I3} (2001Za08), 1.5 (1986Fa08), 1.77 {I9} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1090.92 {I2} (2012Da17), 1090.71 {I4} (2001Za08), 1090.9 (1986Fa08), 1090.7 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=3.80 {I4} (2012Da04), 3.61 {I2} (2012Da17), 4.361 {I1} (2001Za08), 3.1 (1986Fa08), 4.36 {I22} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1256.8 {I2} (2012Da17), 1256.66 {I2} (2001Za08), 1256.7 (1986Fa08), 1256.7 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=1.44 {I4} (2012Da04), 1.52 {I4} (2012Da17), 1.331 {I2} (2001Za08), 1.03 (1986Fa08), 1.33 {I7} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1215.49 {I2} (2012Da17), 1215.31 {I8} (2001Za08), 1215.5 (1986Fa08), 1215.3 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=1.19 {I2} (2012Da04), 1.20 {I1} (2012Da17), 1.223 {I2} (2001Za08), 1.2 (1986Fa08), 1.22 {I6} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1381.3 {I3} (2012Da17), 1380.80 {I2} (2001Za08), 1382 (1986Fa08), 1380.8 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.058 {I4} (2012Da04), 0.067 {I9} (2012Da17), 0.0940 {I3} (2001Za08), 0.03 (1986Fa08), 0.094 {I9} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1254.6 {I2} (2012Da17), 1254.36 {I12} (2001Za08), 1254.8 (1986Fa08), 1254.36 {I12} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=11.5 {I1} (2012Da04), 11.4 {I1} (2012Da17), 11.476 {I16} (2001Za08), 10 (1986Fa08), 11.48 {I11} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1420.44 {I1} (2012Da17), 1420.19 {I10} (2001Za08), 1420.5 (1986Fa08), 1420.19 {I10} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=100 {I1} in 2012Da04, 100 in 2012Da17 and 2001Za08 %I|g=0.261 {I5} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1310.56 {I2} (2012Da17), 1310.37 {I2} (2001Za08), 1310.6 (1986Fa08), 1310.37 {I10} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=5.87 {I6} (2012Da04), 5.54 {3} (2012Da17), 5.598 {I10} (2001Za08), 5.4 (1986Fa08), 5.6 {I6} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1476.39 {I2} (2012Da17), 1476.09 {I9} (2001Za08), 1254.8 (1986Fa08), 1476.1 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.643 {I8} (2012Da04), 0.669 {I9} (2012Da17), 0.669 {I3} (2001Za08), 10 (1986Fa08), 0.67 {I7} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1370.6 {I1} (2012Da17), 1370.25 {I2} (2001Za08), 1370.6 (1986Fa08), 1370.3 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=1.04 {I1} (2012Da04), 0.90 {I5} (2012Da17), 1.049 {I3} (2001Za08), 1.1 (1986Fa08), 1.05 {I5} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1536.30 {I6} (2012Da17), 1536.02 {I9} (2001Za08), 1536.3 (1986Fa08), 1536.0 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.955 {I10} (2012Da04), 0.947 {I9} (2012Da17), 0.965 {I6} (2001Za08), 1.0 (1986Fa08), 0.97 {I10} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1392.7 {I1} (2012Da17), 1392.117 {I6} (2001Za08), 1393 (1986Fa08), 1392.1 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.050 {I4} (2012Da04), 0.055 {I7} (2012Da17), 0.0654 {I2} (2001Za08), 0.03 (1986Fa08), 0.065 {I7} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1558.53 {I7} (2012Da17), 1558.31 {I32} (2001Za08), 1558.5 (1986Fa08), 1558.3 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.108 {I4} (2012Da04), 0.119 {I6} (2012Da17), 0.1293 {I8} (2001Za08), 0.09 (1986Fa08), 0.120 {I12} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1578.05 {I6} (2012Da17), 1577.83 {I39} (2001Za08), 1578.3 (1986Fa08), 1577.8 {I4} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.249 {I4} (2012Da04), 0.240 {I7} (2012Da17), 0.259 {I2} (2001Za08), 0.2 (1986Fa08), 0.259 {I26} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1517.5 {I3} (2012Da17), 1518 (1986Fa08), 1254.36 {I12} (1980Ge04). |g not seen by 2001Za08 
$I|g=0.018 {I2} (2012Da04), 0.020 {I9} (2012Da17), 0.02 (1986Fa08), 11.48 {I11} (1980Ge04). I|g<0.0010 (2001Za08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1683.04 {I6} (2012Da17), 1682.81 {I4} (2001Za08), 1683.4 (1986Fa08), 1682.8 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=1.16 {I1} (2012Da04), 1.18 {I1} (2012Da17), 1.183 {I12} (2001Za08), 1.2 (1986Fa08), 1.18 {I6} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1595.33 {I2} (2012Da17), 1594.95 {I11} (2001Za08), 1595.7 (1986Fa08), 1594.9 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.876 {I9} (2012Da04), 1.02 {I4} (2012Da17), 0.867 {I7} (2001Za08), 0.93 (1986Fa08), 0.87 {I9} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1761.4 {I6} (2012Da17), 1762.72 {I8} (2001Za08), 1762 (1986Fa08), 1762.7 {I5} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.016 {I2} (2012Da04), 0.038 {I7} (2012Da17), 0.0329 {I4} (2001Za08), 0.03 (1986Fa08), 0.033 {I3} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1600.51 {I7} (2012Da17), 1600.39 {I21} (2001Za08), 1601.4 (1986Fa08), 1600.4 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.124 {I3} (2012Da04), 0.135 {I6} (2012Da17), 0.137 {I11} (2001Za08), 0.05 (1986Fa08), 0.137 {I14} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1766.4 {I3} (2012Da17), 1766.00 {I7} (2001Za08), 1767.6 (1986Fa08), 1766.0 {I2} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.099 {I5} (2012Da04), 0.090 {I3} (2012Da17), 0.0898 {I12} (2001Za08), 0.1 (1986Fa08), 0.090 {I9} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1690.6 {I3} (2012Da17), 1690.51 {I6} (2001Za08), 1691.2 (1986Fa08), 1690.5 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.102 {I4} (2012Da04), 0.040 {I25} (2012Da17), 0.0879 {I9} (2001Za08), 0.11 (1986Fa08), 0.088 {I9} (1980Ge04) 
RI$from 2012Da17. Based on the |g|g-coin data and half-life analysis, 2012Da17 concluded that only a fraction of the 1691|g belongs to the decay of {+139}Ba, other component was ascribed to the decay of {+124}Sb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1754.6 {I1} (2012Da17), 1754.68 {I16} (2001Za08), 1755 (1986Fa08), 1754.7 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.040 {I3} (2012Da04), 0.048 {I5} (2012Da17), 0.0391 {I5} (2001Za08), 0.02 (1986Fa08), 0.039 {I4} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1920.3 {I2} (2012Da17), 1920.21 {I13} (2001Za08), 1922 (1986Fa08), 1920.2 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.062 {I3} (2012Da04), 0.068 {I6} (2012Da17), 0.061 {I12} (2001Za08), 0.04 (1986Fa08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1796.1 {I3} (2012Da17), 1796.35 {I5} (2001Za08), 1797 (1986Fa08), 1796.4 {I3} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.024 {I2} (2012Da04), 0.029 {I4} (2012Da17), 0.0408 {I7} (2001Za08), 0.02 (1986Fa08), 0.041 {I4} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1896 (1988Fa06), 1896 {I1} (1969Be15), 1894.7 {I7} (1968Hi13) 
$I|g from 2012Da04. Others: <0.02 (2012Da17), 0.02 (1986Fa08), <0.008 (2001Za08), 0.02 (1969Be15), 0.008 {I6} (1968Hi13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2060.1 {I3} (2012Da17), 2061.22 {I35} (2001Za08), 2061 (1986Fa08), 2060.2 {I4} (1980Ge04) 
$I|g=0.043 {I3} (2012Da04), 0.045 {I5} (2012Da17), 0.0226 {I5} (2001Za08), 0.05 (1986Fa08), 0.0226 {I23} (1980Ge04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$transition width likely overestimated, should be treated as upper limit. Note that in 2001Bu16 evaluation, |G{-0}/|G=0.50 {I7}, not 0.67 {I3} as quoted by 2007Sc18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$|d(9/2|)7/2)=+0.10 {I18}. 
A2$A{-2}(theory)=+0.092 (9/2|)7/2), -0.133 (9/2|)9/2), (9/2|)11/2)=+0.05, assuming pure dipole. Evaluators note that 9/2|)9/2 is not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1970Sz01 in level-scheme Fig. 3 show a 5687|g feeding a 1770 level, but the level-energy difference gives E|g=5867 keV. It is possible that E|g=5687 in authors' Fig. 3 is a typo and that it should be 5867 keV, which the evaluators list here 
E$from 1970Sz01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
%I|g=14.1 {I4} 
RI$57.8 {I17} can not be confirmed neither as from 1977De34 as given by 1994Pe19 nor from other reference. As I|g=60 {I4} from 1990Me03 would produce negative |g feeding to g.s., this presumably determined 1994Pe19 to adjust it to the value adopted here 
M L:M:N=260 {I30}:53 {I6}:13 {I2}; L1/L2=13.8 {I34}, L1/L3=55 {I9} (1982Ad02); L1:L2:L3:M:N=20:2:1:10:5 (1951Co39); L/M+N=2.4 {I3} (1959Bo61) 
E from 1970Ke09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.22 {I17} 
RI I|g=4.69 {I12} (1991Ch05) 
E from 1970Ke09 
M L:M:N=212 {I40}:46 {I9}:12 {I2}, L1:L2:L3=1000 {I33}:106 {I11}:31 {I8} (1982Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.0010 {I10} 
E from E(level) difference 
RI |g was not observed (1990Me03,1982Ad02). Others: 0.054 {I7} (1991Ch05), 0.06 (1969Ka33), |<0.005 (1970Ke09); |<0.01 (1966Mo16) 
M from Adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
%I|g=6.21 {I9} 
E from 1990Me03. Other: 162.369 {I6} (1979Bo26) 
M K:L:M=6.7 {I3}:1.00 {I6}:0.23 {I2} (1982Ad02); K:L:M=10:5:2 (1951Co39); K/L+M=3.5 {I8} (1959Bo61); L1/L2=13.3 {I7}, L1/L3=60 {I10} (1966GeZZ) 
RI absolute I|g=6.21% {I8} (1977De34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
%I|g=4.29 {I6} 
RI absolute I|g=4.30% {I5} (1977De34) 
M,RI |a(K)exp=0.043 {I3}; K/L=9.9 {I26} (1982Ad02); L1/L2=14.6 {I7}, L1/L3|>23 (1966GeZZ); |a(K)exp=0.041 {I2} (1991Ch05) 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1982Ad02), see also 1965Bu07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
%I|g=3.10 {I4} 
M |a(K)exp=0.018 {I2} (1991Ch05); |a(K)exp=0.025 {I4} (1982Ad02) K:L=0.32 {I4}:|?0.044 (1982Ad02) 
RI absolute I|g=3.15% {I4} (1977De34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.0002 {I2} 
E$transition is not observed neither in 1982Ad02, nor in 1990Me03; E|g from E(level) difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E from 1982Ad02. Other: 537.261 {I33} (1979Bo26) 
RI,M absolute I|g=24.39% {I22} (1977De34). Others: 23.4% {I10} (1982Ad02); 25.7% {I6} (1975Ha50); |a(K)exp=0.0104 {I4}; K/L/M+N=1.04 {I4}/0.13 {I1}/0.06 {I1} (1991Ch05); |a(K)exp=0.0129 {I7}; K/L=6.8 {I7} (1982Ad02). Others: |a(K)exp=0.006 {I2}, K/L+=5.2 {I5} (1955Ro17); K/L+M=4 (1951Co39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$0.140 {I8} (in per 100 captures) is considered by 2007ChZX as from 1994Pe19 (which give 0.141 {I8}), but not adopted, while other |g's in this category were adopted (no explanation found) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$i|g|g=3.59 {I1430} by 2000Va30, uncertainty probably misprinted; this value was divided by 10 by evaluator for relative branching 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1979Bo26. Other: 190.47 {I20} (2022Ru06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.172 {i25} (1979Pr01), 0.169 {i15} (1970Be43), K/L=8.1 {i8} (1970Be43), |d|<0.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1979Bo26 
M |a(K)exp=0.11 {I2}; |d may also be -0.03 {I5} (if J(432.3)=0) 
RI I(255|g)/|b{+-}=0.211 {I6} (1983Ch39), 0.20 {I2} (1984So18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1979Bo26 
RI I|g=10.8% {I18} if I|g=541 (1984So18) 
M |a(K)exp=0.09 {I2}; |d may also be +0.33 {I3} (if J(77.59)=1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp=215 {I83} (renormalized by evaluator using |a(K)(E2) for 117.1|g in {+143}Cs |b{+-} decay), L/M=5.7 {I6} (1979Sc11), L/M=4.0 (1985Ra20) 
TI from |SI(|g+ce) feeding 29.9 level. Value is lower limit since the 29.9 level could also be fed by |b decay. Note that I|g gives I(|g+ce)=990 {I250} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level energies 
TI from I|g of |g's feeding the 211 level seen in coincidence with the 178 and 208 |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E from 1979Bo19 
RI$I|g=24.9% {I29} (1984So18) 
M |a(K)exp=0.11 {I1} (1979Sc11); |a(K)exp=0.10 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.013 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.002 {I1} (1985Ra20), |a(L)exp=0.014 {I3} (1988Fa03). |a(L)exp suggests predominately M1. 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1988Fa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.047 {I5} (1988Fa03), 0.041 {I12} (1985Ra20), 0.09 {I2} (1979Sc11) |a(K)=0.0658 (M1), |a(K)=0.0584 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.039 {I2}, K/L=4.9 {I7} (1988Fa03); |a(K)exp=0.038 {I12} (1985Ra20); 0.053 {I5} (1979Sc11); |a(K)=0.0496 (M1), |a(K)=0.0417 (E2) 
MR from |g|g(|q) |d=0.995-0.975 (1988Fa03); from K/L |d>2 
E from 1979Bo19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.21 {I3} (for 177|g+178|g) (1979Sc11), 0.242 {I75} (1985Ra20), |a(K)=0.1886 (M1), |a(K)=0.204 (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.012 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0027 {I11} (1988Fa03) (for doublet) |a(K)=0.018 (M1), |a(K)=0.013 (E2) 
E 431.384 {I13} from 1979Bo19 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$Based on |a=0.5 {I2}, measured in a |g|g coin experiment (2009Lu09). This multipolarity assignment supersedes that of E1 in 2007Wa20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 assigned in the ENSDF database, but measured |a(K)exp=4 {I1} gives M1+E2, with any value of |d 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0019 {I4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=110 {I20} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0012 {I+9-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)=150 {I+110-50} (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1 assigned in the ENSDF database from measured K/L ratio; M1+E2 considered in 2021Ol03 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0062 {I7} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=250 {I30} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0050 {I+15-9} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)=300 {I+90-60} (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$(M1) assigned in the ENSDF database from measured K/L ratio and |a(K)exp; M1+E2 considered by 2021Ol03 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.023 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>470 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.022 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>482 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0019 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>17 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0013 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>12 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0013 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>6 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>8.7|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>4.0 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2,E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>3.4|*10{+-5}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0053 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>18 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0026 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>18 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>3.0|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2,E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>3.0|*10{+-5}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0047 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>10 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0024 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>9.6 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>2.8|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2,E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>5.2|*10{+-5}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0045 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>28 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0042 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>26 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>4.8|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2,E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>8.2|*10{+-6}, B(M1)(W.u.)>7.3|*10{+-4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>1.7 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>6.2|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>1.4 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>7.01|*10{+-6} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2,E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>2.3|*10{+-5}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0020 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>11 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0011 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>5.7 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>1.2|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2,E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>2.3|*10{+-5}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0020 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>6.5 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0012 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>3.9 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>1.4|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI 14.2% {I14} (1984So18) 
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=-3.9 {I+12-26}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=-0.060 {I39}, A{-4}=-0.069 {I74} for the cascade 251|g-121|g assuming |d(251|g)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=-6.0 {I+23-58}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.119 {I38}, A{-4}=0.046 {I72} for the cascade 232|g-140|g assuming |d(232|g)=0 
RI 22.6% {I30} (1984So18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. Existence is required by |g|g 
RI$from intensities balance at the level, assuming M1 mult; I(|g+ce)=87 {I2} (the evaluators). I(|g+ce)=170 {I11} from |g|g (1985Ch16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$The 2{+nd} value |d=-5.4 {I+19-60}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.119 {I38}, A{-4}=0.046 {I72} for the cascade 232|g-140|g assuming |d(232|g)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI 12.7% {I13} (1984So18) 
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=27 {I+|@-18}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.013 {I41}, A{-4}=0.06 {I78} for the 269|g-197|g cascade assuming |d(269|g)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.046 {I55}, A{-4}=0.03 {I12} for the cascade 172|g-294|g; A{-2}=-0.019 {I82}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I18} for the cascade 114|g-294|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=2.7 {I+10-6}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.122 {I45}, A{-4}=0.033 {I94} for the cascade 185|g-140|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$balance of I(|g+ce) at the 326.5 keV level depends little on |a for this |g; present level scheme conforms to E1 mult for this transition but not M1 as follows from assumption of 1978BlZY 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1+M2]
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=6.6 {I+91-25}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=-0.019 {I49}, A{-4}=0.081 {I90} for the 316|g-392|g cascade. Values |d=-0.42 {I+16-19} and |d=38 {I+|@-32} from A{-2}=0.041 {I79}, A{-4}=0.00 {I16} for the 488|g-392|g cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=-1.7 {I7}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.139 {I77}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I19} for the cascade 279|g-284|g assuming |d(279|g)=0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=-6.1 {I+21-49}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.129 {I31}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I88} for the cascade 279|g-429|g assuming |d(279|g)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=-61 {I+51-|@}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.060 {I44}, A{-4}=-0.076 {I85} for the cascade 242|g-197|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: E{-|g}=298.794 {I16} (1979Bo26). 
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=2.7 {I+9-6}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.126 {I41}, A{-4}=0.000 {I80} for the cascade 298|g-140|g assuming |d(232|g)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=21 {I+|@-13}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=0.096 {I67}, A{-4}=0.04 {I15} for the cascade 414|g-269|g assuming |d(269|g)=0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value |d=2.7 {I+14-9}; both |d values were derived from A{-2}=-0.134 {I74}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I16} for the cascade 508|g-251|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$entered by 1998Hw08 on basis of observation of (340.8|g)(148.2|g), (287.9|g)(158.9|g) and (364.0|g)(82.2|g) coincidences when double gating on 130.7|g and 138.3|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ENSDF 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.076, B(E2)(W.u.)>0 (2021Ol03) With 3+ assignment, E1 is also possible 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.074 (compiler) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)>3.5 if |d(E2/M1)=0.14, but also overlaps zero. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$M1+E2 in ENSDF. [E1] from J|p assignment in 2021Ol03 
$Compiler's note: Mult should be (E1), |d=-0.66 {I+11-15} should be revised if (2+) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>5.6|*10{+-4}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.038, B(E2)(W.u.)>380 for literature value of |d(E2/M1)=-0.66 {I13} (2021Ol03). 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>8.0|*10{+-4} (if E1); B(M1)(W.u.)>0.049 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>1400 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$[E1] from J|p assignments in 2021Ol03. None in ENSDF 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.015 {I1} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.118 {I1} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2300 {I100} for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0047 {I+13-14} (compiler) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00025 to 0.65 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>8800 if E2 (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ENSDF 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0027 {I1}, B(E2)(W.u.)=27 {I2} (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00325 {I30}, B(E2)(W.u.)=32 {I8} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$(M1+E2) in ENSDF. E1 from |DJ|p 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>6.1|*10{+-4} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.046 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>5800 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.03 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>5257 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>5.3|*10{+-4} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$Mult from J|p in 2021Ol03, E1 is also possible 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0039 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>370 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0019 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>183 (if E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ENSDF 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.021 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>3.1 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.011; B(E2)(W.u.)>4.2 if |d(E2/M1)=0.25; also overlaps zero (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.2|*10{+-4} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.011 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>940 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0086 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>796 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>1.01|*10{+-4} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$(E1) in ENSDF. J|p in 2021Ol03 require M1+E2 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>5.5|*10{+-5}, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0043, B(E2)(W.u.)>6.9 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0035; B(E2)(W.u.)>4.3; B(E1)(W.u.)>5.3|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ENSDF 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>4.0|*10{+-5} for pure E1 (2021Ol03) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>4.0|*10{+-5} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ENSDF 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0025, B(E2)(W.u.)>2.6 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0021; B(E2)(W.u.)>0.03 (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from ENSDF 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0013, B(E2)(W.u.)>1.7 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0012; B(E2)(W.u.)>1.3 (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0047 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>290 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0038 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>239 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.1|*10{+-4} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>1.0|*10{+-4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>290 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0086 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>248 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>1.0|*10{+-4} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>2.6|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0023 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>44 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0018 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>34 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>2.1|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>4.8|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0027 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>130 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0035 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>171 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>4.4|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>4.7|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0033 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>80 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.003 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>79 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>3.7|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>5.5|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0042 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>81 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0036 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>75 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>4.5|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>2.9|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0024 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>22 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0019 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>18 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>2.4|*10{+-5} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>9|*10{+-6} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0078 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>5.6 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>5.6|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>4.0 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>7.0|*10{+-6} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.4|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0012 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>4.8 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>9.5|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>3.7 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>1.2|*10{+-5} (if E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.4|*10{+-6} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>1.3|*10{+-4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.39 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>5.3|*10{+-5} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>0.16 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>6.7|*10{+-7} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>2.3|*10{+-6} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>2.1|*10{+-4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.35 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>1.5|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>0.26 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>1.9|*10{+-6} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$dipole in ENSDF, DJ|p requires E1 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>5.0|*10{+-5} (2021Ol03) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)>3.9|*10{+-5} (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)>1.1|*10{+-5} for pure E1, B(M1)(W.u.)>9.6|*10{+-4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.64 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>6.8|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>4.5 (if E2); B(E1)(W.u.)>7.6|*10{+-6} (if E1) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$J|p=(1-,2-,3-) listed for final level 392 for 316.3|g in Table III should be (2+) as in authors' Table I and Fig. 7. 
M$dipole in ENSDF, DJ|p requires M1+E2 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0021 for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>12 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0016 (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>9.2 (if E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>1.7|*10{+-4} for pure M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.84 for pure E2 (2021Ol03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>1.01|*10{+-4} (if M1); B(E2)(W.u.)>0.53 (if E2) (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$(M1,E1,E2) compatible with RUL; (E1) from intensity balance on 120 level (M1 and E2 results in negative balance) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$stronger D+Q mixing found by 2017Wa50 ({+252}Cf SF decay) suggests (M1+E2) compatible with level scheme: |d=-0.19 or -6.5 (2017Wa50 in {+252}Cf SF dataset); other: |d=-0.02 {I3} (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$355.2 (1981ShZH); value of 2007SyZZ was adopted becasue it is in better agreement with |DE(levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$The 167.6-212.0 keV cascade is not analyzed due to the multiplet nature of the 167|g and high conversion coefficient of the 61.9|g 
M$final assignment of 2017Wi15 is E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.110 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.032 {I36} for 297.4-414.3|g cascade (2017Wi15) 
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I9} for 297.8|g-74.4|g cascade. (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.095 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I1} for 346.1-454.4|g cascade (2017Wi15) 
$A{-2}=+0.07 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} for 346.2|g-212.1|g cascade (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$stronger D+Q mixing found by 2017Wa50 suggests (M1+E2) compatible with level scheme 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} for 512.8|g-212.1|g cascade |d=-0.19 or -6.5 (2017Wa50) 
$A{-2}=-0.085 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.009 {I22} for 512.7-212.0|g cascade |d=-0.02 {I3} (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$assignment of 2017Wi15 is E1 
$A{-2}=-0.68 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.082 {I35} for 588.9-212.0|g cascade |d=-0.005 {I38} (2017Wi15) 
$A{-2}=-0.09 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I9} for 588.8|g-212.1|g cascade (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$assignment of 2017Wi15 is E1 
$A{-2}=-0.105 {I42}, A{-4}=-0.043 {I60} for 570.3-346.1|g cascade |d=-0.06 {I7} (2017Wi15) 
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} for 570.5|g-346.2|g cascade (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$assignment of 2017Wi15 is E1 
$A{-2}=-0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} for 487.9|g-454.4|g cascade (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.098 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I14} for 528.7- sum |g cascade (2017Wi15) 
$A{-2}=+0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} for 528.8|g-454.4|g cascade (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$assignment of 2017Wi15 is E2, |DJ=2 transition although |DJ(lev)=1 
$A{-2}=+0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} for 234.8|g-487.9|g cascade |d=0.42 or 2.3 (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}= 0.111 {I18}, A{-4}= 0.076 {I26} for 538.8- sum |g cascade (2017Wi15) 
$A{-2}=+0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I3} for 539.0|g-528.8|g cascade (2017Wa50) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=9.3 {I21} is consistent with M1 or E2. From intensity balance at g.s. Mult must be mainly M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$1974ClZX report 305 {I21} photons per 1.0|*10{+5} fissions 
M$from |a(exp)=0.96 {I24} (2009Lu11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)>3.6 if mult(180.1|g)=E1; >4.3 if mult(180.1|g)=M1; >4.5 if mult(180.1|g)=E2 suggest that mult(46.0|g) not E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E$From level energy. 2007Su07 suggest the transition to explain the existence of a long-lived isomer. 
M$ From comparison of measured half-life with Weisskopf estimates (2007Su07), and from (1/2+) to (7/2-) for probable placement. Authors measure E|g=103 keV {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$2004Sm02 propose E2 transition from R value, but 2007Su07 point out that this R value is also compatible with a 7/2+ to 7/2- E1 assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$ 92 keV if the new isomer corresponds to 1/2+ bandhead proposed by 2002Pe15. 
M$ From comparison of measured half-life with Weisskopf estimates (2007Su07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$2004Sm02 propose E2 transition from R value, but 2007Su07 point out that this R value is also compatible with E1 assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$|p=+ quoted for initial and final levels in table 1 of 2002Pe15 is a misprint 
$DCO is for a doublet at 654 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from adopted gammas 
RI$From intensity balance: in the calculation, 125.5 keV |g is assumed as (M1,E2) and 288.3 keV |g is assumed as E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$data are discrepant with values of 11.0 {I10} in |e decay, 60.5 {I14} in ({+34}S,n|g) and 24 {I4} in ({+16}O,3n|g). Unweighted average is taken 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 22.5 {I19} in |e decay, 74 {I9} and 46 {I7} in ({+16}O,3n|g); the latter are in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$others: 29 {I3} and 100 {I6} in ({+16}O,3n|g), the former value in disagreement 
MR$B(E2)(W.u.) is too high for T{-1/2}=0.51 ps and |d(E2/M1)=0.8 {i4}; RUL<300 suggests either |d<0.3 or a longer half-life 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$other: 32 {I4} from ({+16}O,3n|g) is in disagreement 
MR$B(E2)(W.u.) is too high for T{-1/2}=0.51 ps and |d(E2/M1)=0.95 {i75}; RUL<300 suggests either |d<0.2 or longer half-life 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$241.9 3 (1977Gi17) for a doublet 
$RI=20 3 (1977Gi17) 
A{-2}=-0.54 {I9} (1977Gi17). 
MR$-2.1 {I4} also possible but less likely due to |DJ=1 coupled structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from 1987Ko24. |g not given in 1990Ko25 
(772|g)(254|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.51 {I7}, A{-4}=+1.15 {I12} (1997As05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.37 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1984To10) 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4} (1974De12) 
A2=+0.32 10, A4=-0.06 14 (1970Sm05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$R=1.2 {I2} 
M$ ratio R consistent with |DJ=2, (E2) or |DJ=0, (E1); former assignment is more likely as discussed in 2012Pa26 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from {+131}Pr |e decay (5.71 s) 
TI$from decay scheme 
M$|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I2} value confirms mult.=D for |g, also the transition is between 9/2- and 7/2+ states 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$25 {I3} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=496.9 2 (1990Ko25), 496.8 (1988Ba42), 496.1 10 (1974Ar27) 
$ (497|g)(325|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=0.98 {I3}, W(55|')/W(90|')=0.757 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$<0.5 (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=340.6 5 (1990Ko25) 
MR$+39 +|@-26 
$ (341|g)(534|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=0.87 {I6}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.10 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$3.5 {I8} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=377.2 2 (1990Ko25), 378 (1988Ba42) 
MR$+37 +|@-22 
$ (377|g)(822|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=0.69 {I4}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.00 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$14.1 {I14} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=874.2 2 (1990Ko25), 874.0 (1988Ba42) 
$ (874|g)(325|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=0.83 {I3}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$2.0 {I6} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=524.6 2 (1990Ko25) 
MR$+0.84 {I+29-18} or |@ 
$ (525|g)(534|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=0.92 {I5}, W(55|')/W(90|')=0.87 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2.7 {I6} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=561.8 2 (1990Ko25), 561 (1988Ba42) 
$ (562|g)(822|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=1.24 {I8}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.07 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(339|g)(336|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=1.03 {I5}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.06 {I5} 
$(339|g)(833|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=1.03 {I8}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.00 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$3.0 {I8} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=456.5 4 (1990Ko25) 
$ (457|g)(377|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=1.05 {I7}, W(55|')/W(90|')=0.95 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (576|g)(336|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=1.01 {I12}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.05 {I9} 
$ (576|g)(833|g)(|q): W(55|')/W(90|')=1.2 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$1.5 {I5} (1990Ko25) 
$ EG=1409.0 8 (1990Ko25) 
$ (1409|g)(325|g)(|q): W(180|')/W(90|')=1.55 {I4}, W(55|')/W(90|')=1.181 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 325.1 {I1} (1997Pa15), 325.4 {I3} (1972Ta25), 325.6 {I10} (1970Sm05), 325.4 {I5} (1968Wa14). The value given by 1997Pa15 appears to be low by 0.2-0.3 keV as compared to the values from other experiments 
DCO=0.94 {I2} 
POL=+0.18 {I2} 
A{-2}=+0.32 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} 
$DCO=1.43 10 (1972Ta25) 
A{-2}=+0.26 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1970Sm05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 532.2 5 (1972Ta25), 533.5 10 (1970Sm05), 533.5 8 (1968Wa14) 
DCO=1.04 {I2} 
POL=+0.28 {I3} 
A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} 
A{-2}=+0.26 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} (1970Sm05) 
$DCO=1.36 12 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 682.4 7 (1972Ta25), 684.5 10 (1970Sm05), 683.8 10 (1968Wa14) 
DCO=1.05 {I2} 
POL=+0.32 {I4} 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} 
A{-2}=+0.30 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I7} (1970Sm05) 
$DCO=1.29 13 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 786.8 8 (1972Ta25), 789.0 10 (1970Sm05), 787.8 12 (1968Wa14) 
DCO=1.13 {I3} for 788 doublet 
POL=+0.32 {I4} for 788 doublet 
A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} 
A{-2}=+0.37 {6}, A{-4}=-0.27 {I9} (1970Sm05) 
$DCO=1.46 14 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 827.7 8 (1972Ta25), 828.7 12 (1968Wa14) 
DCO=1.00 {I2} 
POL=+0.33 {I4} 
A{-2}=+0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I5} 
$DCO=1.30 15 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$This |g is not listed in table 2 of 1997Pa15. Data for this |g were communicated by one of the authors of 1997Pa15 (E. Paul) on October 24, 2000 in response to enquiry by B. Singh 
DCO=1.13 {I4} 
POL=+0.49 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 569.7 6 (1972Ta25) 
DCO=0.99 {I2} 
POL=+0.38 {I4} 
A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} 
$DCO=1.45 15 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 698.6 7 (1972Ta25) 
DCO=1.04 {I2} 
POL=+0.39 {I5} 
A{-2}=+0.39 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} 
$DCO=1.39 14 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 823.4 8 (1972Ta25) 
DCO=1.11 {I2} 
POL=+0.31 {I4} 
A{-2}=+0.29 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I10} 
$DCO=1.33 20 (1972Ta25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$is calculated by evaluators as level energy difference according to level scheme (fig.1 of 1987Ma57) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M$ambiguous, may be M2 (I|g value is about the same) because of parity of the band E is not determined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$ambiguous, may be M1+E2 (I|g value is the same) because of parity of the band E is not determined. 
R(DCO)=0.78 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=0.57 {I33} 
M$ambiguous, may be M1+E2 (I|g value is the same) because of parity of the band E is not determined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$ambiguous, may be M1+E2 (I|g value is the same) because of parity of the band G is not determined. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. E|g=285 in figure 3 of 1996Ha20 seems incorrect in view of earlier value of 294.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference. E|g=941 in figure 3 of 1996Ha20 does not fit between the levels shown in the level scheme. It is assumed (by the evaluators) that E|g=516 is correct 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$by analogy with other M1+E2 |g-rays belonging to the rotational band (stated in Table 4 of 1974Gi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R{-ac}=0.77 {I4} 
$A{-2}, A{-4} and R{-ac} for 244.9|g+244.6|g 
M$assigned by compiler based on a similar assignment for 244.6|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$For a 23/2- to 23/2- (|DJ=0) transition A{-2} should be positive and A{-4} should be zero for pure M1 transition (compiler's note) 
$R{-ac}=0.83 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R{-ac}=0.71 {I4} 
$Ordering of the 398.5-401.0 cascade is from Table I in 2016Ay04; it is reversed in Fig. 1 of 2016Ay04. Also initial J|p=31/2+ for 401.0|g in authors' Table I seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R{-ac}=0.74 {I5} 
$Ordering of the 398.5-401.0 cascade is from Table I in 2016Ay04; it is reversed in Fig. 1 of 2016Ay04. Also initial J|p=29/2+ for 398.5|g in authors' Table I seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-ac}=1.60 {I16} 
$Positive sign of A{-4} is inconsistent with stretched quadrupole (compiler's note) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler. 2017Zh02 give 3.8 {I3}. By considering only the 907.8|g from 3719 level, compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=3.4 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+135}Pr |e decay 
M$from |a(K)exp and K/L ratio in {+135}Pr |e decay and |a(exp) deduced from intensity balance in {+135}Ce IT decay. In a ce spectrum shown by 1970Dr04 (in {+135}Ce IT decay), K/L ratio seems much smaller than K/L(theory for M1)=7.3, suggesting some E2 admixture 
MR$from RUL(E2)=300. Values from ce and |g-ray data disagree: |d(E2/M1)=1.0 {I5} (from intensity balance in {+135}Ce IT decay); >1.5 from |a(K)exp and 0.0 from K/L ratio (in {+135}Pr |e decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from IT decay 
E$from {+135}Pr |e decay. E|g=295.8 {I5} in IT decay 
M$|a(K)exp in IT decay gives E2(+M1) with |d>1.2, |DJ|p requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(exp)=3.1 {I6} from intensity balance gives M1+E2, |d=1.0 {I5}; but RUL(E2)=300 requires |d<0.4 
RI$ with |d(E2/M1)<0.4, there is problem with intensity balance at 82.5 level, net balance=-18 {I11} in absolute units. For intensity to be balanced the photon intensity of 82.4|g should be 124 {I8} in relative units as compared to the reported intensity of 98 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=2.9 {I9} and K/L=12 {I4}. Intensity balance in {+135}Ce IT decay suggests E2 admixture 
MR$from RUL(E2)=300. From ce data, |d(E2/M1)>1.5 (from |a(K)exp) and 0.0 (from K/L). But K/L ratio from a ce spectrum in {+135}Ce IT decay (figure 1 of 1970Dr04) seems much smaller than 12 {I4} (1973VaYZ) and K/L(theory for M1)=7.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$almost all the intensity belongs with the 296.09 level, the placement from 296.12 level is uncertain 
M$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I2} (1973VaYZ), 0.11 {I3} (1972Ar08) give M1,E2. K/L=7.9 {I11} (1973VaYZ) gives M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=210 {I25} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.045 {I5} (1973VaYZ), 0.050 {I15} (1972Ar08) give M1,E2; K/L=7.1 {I10} (1973VaYZ) gives |d<0.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=0.9 {I1} is consistent with |DJ=1 or 2 and also with |DJ=0, dipole. 1990Ma26 assign |DJ=0, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$other: second solution of -0.50 {I4} from |g|g(|q) in {+136}Pr |e decay is in disagreement with |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$transition not observed, upper limit for intensity is estimated in Coulomb excitation from the detection limit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
MR$other: second solution of -0.50 {I4} from 2007Ah02 is in disagreement with |a(K)exp 
M,MR$A{-2}=-0.39 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (2007Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$assignment to 23- to 22- transition in Table 1 appears to be a misprint, given the placement as a transition in positive parity band in Figure 2 of 2005La29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.04 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I11} (1975Yo01). 
M$|a(K)exp suggests E2 or E1 multipolarity, while |g(|q) favors the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
%I|g=11.1 {I3}, using the calculated normalization. 
M |a(K)exp=5.4 (see 1978LeZA), 5.5 {I15} (1955Br05), K/L1=5.6 {I12}, L1/L2=3.7 {I16}, L1/L3=1.92 {I63}, L2/L3=0.52 {I29} (1976KaYX), K:L:M+=100 {I6}:36 {I2}:11 {I1} (1975He20), K:L:M:N=1000:330 {I20}:76 {I5}:20 {I2} (1975ArYT), L1:L2:L3=100:22.5 {I4}:53.8 {I6} (see 1978LeZA) 
MR <0.1 (1964Fr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
21/2(+) to (23/2)+ shown in table 1 is a misprint. Starting J|p should be 25/2(+) as in level-scheme figure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$2008Bh10 list (M1+E2), but |DJ|p suggests E1; (E1+M2) confirmed in e-mail reply of Aug 29, 2008 from one of the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ Final level J|p=(17/2+) in Table I, but (15/2+) in figure 4 of 2008Bh10; (15/2+) confirmed in e-mail reply of Aug 29, 2008 from one of the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$ Final level J|p=(23/2+) in Table I, but (23/2-) in figure 4 of 2008Bh10; (23/2-) confirmed in e-mail reply of Aug 29, 2008 from one of the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$ relative to 100.0 for 824.7|g from {+137}Ce isomer |e decay to {+137}La 
TI$ from 2012To09 
M$ from Adopted dataset for {+137}Ce in ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 722.3 {I3} from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m), 722.1 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 722 {I1} from Coulomb excitation. 
RI$weighted average of 89 {I11} from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m), 81 {I3} from {+139}La(p,2n|g), and 75.7 {I6} Coulomb Excitation. Other: 90 {I3} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) 
M$Other: M1+E2 from Coulomb Excitation with |d=-1.97 {I+32-25} based on |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1510.2 {I2} from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m), 1510.9 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 1510 {I1} from Coulomb excitation. 
RI$from Coulomb excitation 
M$Q from |g(|q) in {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) and Coulomb excitation; M2 is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1038.0 {I1} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), 1037.6 {I9} from {+138}Ce IT decay, 1037.6 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 1037.7 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), 1037.6 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g), and 1038 {I1} from Coulomb excitation. 
M$based on ce data in {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), |g(|q) in {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g) and Coulomb excitation, and |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 302.7 {I1} from {+138}Pr |e decay, 302.9 {I8} from {+138}Ce IT decay, 302.9 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 302.7 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 302.7 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
M$based on ce data in {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h) and {+138}Ce IT decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1347.8 {I10} from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m), 1348.0 {I3} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), 1348.1 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 1348.1 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
M$based on ce data in (p,2n|g) and (|a,2n|g), |g(|q) in {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Coulomb excitation 
M,MR$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(|q); bracket is added by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. 
M,MR$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(|q), bracket added by evaluator. Other: |d=-2.2 {I2} for Mult=M1+E2 in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 79.4 {I6} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), 80.4 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), and 80.4 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
RI$from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h). Other: |<5 from (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 390.9 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 390.8 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), 390.7 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g), and 390.9 {I1} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h). 
RI$from (|a,2n|g) 
M$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g) and {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m). 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. 
M$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(|q) and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m). 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 61 {I9} from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m). 
M$Q from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation; M2 is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 76.7 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 76.4 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 76.5 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 43 {I5} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 34 {I9} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) 
M$based on |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 157.1 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 156.8 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.2 {I10} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) and 8.0 {I4} from {+139}La(p,2n|g). Other: 27.2 {I27} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) 
M$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(DCO) and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 164.7 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 164.6 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) and 164.6 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g) 
RI$from (p,2n|g) 
M$based on |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) and (|a,2n|g); also suggested in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 467.6 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 467.2 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 467.0 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$unweighted average of 29.6 {I10} from (|a,2n|g) and 36 {I2} from (p,2n|g). Other: 56.9 {I30} from ({+12}C,4n|g) 
M$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g) and (p,2n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m). 
M$M1,E2 from ce data in {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m); M1 is ruled out by level-spin difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m) 
RI$weighted average of 68 {I14} from {+138}Pr |e decay (1.45 m) and 80.9 {I10} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 68 {I16} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) and 57.1 {I24} from {+139}La(p,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 438.7 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) and 439.5 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 52 {I8} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 19 {I3} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 16.5 {I12} from {+139}La(p,2n|g). 
MR$from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 906.3 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) and 906.9 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
RI$from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 547.5 {I1} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), 547.3 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), and 547.7 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
RI$from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 680.8 {I5} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h) and 681.8 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 35 {I7} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h), 50 {I7} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 43.5 {I27} from {+139}La(p,2n|g). 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), |DJ=1; polarity from level-parity change 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 770.4 {I4} from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h) and 770.0 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g). 
RI$from (p,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 815.0 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 815.3 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 815.0 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$from (|a,2n|g) 
M$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g) and (p,2n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 979.7 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 979.8 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 979.3 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 45.7 {I21} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g) and 49.6 {I26} from {+139}La(p,2n|g). Others: 36.9 {I19} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 24 {I4} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g) 
M$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g) and (p,2n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,4n|g). A 1202.4|g is observed but unplaced in {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h) from 7- parent 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g) and (p,2n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g). Mult=(E2) suggested by 2009Bh04 in ({+12}C,4n|g) is inconsistent. Mixing ratio is deduced by evaluator from ce data using the BrIccMixing program; M1 is given in (|a,2n|g) and (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI,M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$(E2) from ({+12}C,4n|g) given J|p(3430.2)=(8)+ suggested by 2009Bh04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 430.2 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 430.1 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 430.0 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: 100 {I5} from ({+12}C,4n|g) 
M$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g) and (p,2n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$placed by 2009Bh04 in ({+12}C,4n|g). 1999Zh28 in ({+18}O,4n|g) placed this transition from the 3942 level, making a level at E=2526. See also the comment for 3546 level 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$placed by 2009Bh04 in ({+12}C,4n|g). But this placement is still considered questionable since it wrould require an unreasonable large B(M2) value. 1999Zh28 in ({+18}O,4n|g) has placed this transition from a level at E=2526 to the 2129 level which is however unfavored. See also the comment for 3546 level. 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 403.3 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 403.1 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 403.0 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) 
M$from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 417.6 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 417.5 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 417.4 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
M$based on ce data in (|a,2n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and (|a,4n|g), |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$D from ({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO); polarity from level-parity change 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g). Other: E|g=1146.9 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g). Mult=(M1+E2) deduced by 1978Mu09 in (|a,4n|g) based on |g(|q) is inconsistent and not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 125.0 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) and 124.4 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 10.8 {I16} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) and 17 {I5} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 854.3 {I1} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g), 854.6 {I2} from {+136}Ba(|a,2n|g), and 854.2 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g). Mult=(M1+E2) deduced by 1978Mu09 in (|a,4n|g) based on |g(|q) is inconsistent and not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g). Other: E|g=98.3 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) with bracket added by evaluator since no |g(DCO) and |g(pol) data. This assignment is consistent with |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g). Other: E|g=337.7 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) with bracket added by evaluator since no |g(DCO) and |g(pol) data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 197.2 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) and 198.6 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,4n|g). Other: 254.1 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 319.6 {I2} from {+130}Te({+12}C,4n|g) and 319.3 {I3} from {+138}Ba(|a,4n|g). 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$D from |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,4n|g); polarity from no level-parity change 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,4n|g). Other: 447.5 {I3} from (|a,4n|g) 
M$based on |g(DCO) and |g(pol) in ({+12}C,4n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) with bracket added by evaluator since no |g(DCO) or |g(pol) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$from ({+12}C,4n|g) based on |g(DCO), with bracket added by evaluator since no |g(pol) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+12}C,4n|g) only 
M$from |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,4n|g); polarity from no level-parity change 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1980Mo04. Others: 788.66 {I7} (1979Ta21), 789.1 {I5} (1977Ce04), 789.0 {I3} (1972Gr45), 787.9 {I3} (1972Ma31) 
M$from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=34.2 {I27} (1971Af05), E|g=688.2 {I1}, I|g=33 {I5} (1971Ju01), E|g=687.8 {I8}, I|g=39 {I4} (1970Ho28) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0045 {I8} (1971Af05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$E|g=1476.5 {I15}, I|g=4 {I1} (1970Ho28) 
$I(ce 1477|g)/I(3415|b{++})=0.00035 {I5} (1966Gr15), K/(L+M)=4.9 {I8} (1971Af05) 
TI$from I(ce)/I(ce(K) 789|g)=3.61 {I22} (1971Af05), I(789|g)=100, |a(K)(789|g)=0.00291 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=1551.4 {I4}, I|g=16.5 {I17} (1971Af05), E|g=1551.5 {I2}, I|g=17 {I2} (1971Ju01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00010 {I4} (1971Af05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$a doublet of 318.4+321.6 is marked in the |g spectrum in Fig1 of 1976Lu05 but not assigned to {+138}Ce 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=789.0 {I1} (1972Lu01) 
E$weighted average of 789.0 {I1} (1972Lu01) and 788.7 {I1} (1971Af05) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0034 (1965Ba45), 0.0036 {I7} (1971Af05), K/L=6.7 {I8} (1964Fu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1038.2 {I1} (1972Lu01) and 1037.8 {I1} (1971Af05) 
RI$weighted average of 101 {I5} (1972Lu01) and 100 {I5} (1974Bu03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.00162 {I9}, K/L+M=5.3 {I6} (1964Fu08) 
$A{-2}=+0.092 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.017 {I23} (1964Fu08); A{-2}=+0.055, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1965Gr38) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$E|g=303.3 {I2} (1972Lu01) 
RI$weighted average of 80 {I5} (1972Lu01) and 80 {I8} (1974Bu03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.129 {I10} (1964Fu08), 0.14 {I2} (1965Ba45), K/L+M=2.12 {I8} (1964Fu08), 2.5 {I3} (1965Ba45), K:L1:L2:L3=100:6.0 {I12}:11.0 {I22}:5.6 {I11} (1967Ba66), |a(total)exp=0.190 {I11} (1964Fu08) 
$for 303-1038 cascade, A{-2}=+0.198 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.019 {I16} (1964Fu08), A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1965Gr38); for 303-789 cascade A{-2}=+0.173 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.028 {I25} (1964Fu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=390.6 {I5} (1972Lu01) 
RI$weighted average of 6.06 {I30} (1972Lu01) and 5.8 {I3} (1974Bu03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I15} (1971Af05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=547.6 {I5} (1972Lu01) 
E$1967Ba66 placed a |g ray at 546.2 {I5} from a level at 2372 
RI$weighted average of 5.23 {I26} (1972Lu01) and 5.1 {I4} (1974Bu03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.009 {I3} (1971Af05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$E|g=635.7 {I5} (1972Lu01) 
RI$weighted average of 1.78 {I10} (1972Lu01) and 2.3 {I3} (1974Bu03) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0048 {I24} (1971Af05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1240.1 {I5} (1972Lu01) and 1239.0 {I2} (1974Bu03) 
RI$weighted average of 1.06 {I6} (1972Lu01) and 1.20 {I15} (1974Bu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1455.2 {I5} from 1972Lu01 
RI$weighted average of 0.260 {I19} (1972Lu01) and 0.28 {I4} (1974Bu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1392.1 {I5} (1972Lu01) and 1393.0 {I5} (1974Bu03) 
RI$weighted average of 0.120 {I14} (1972Lu01) and 0.14 {I2} (1974Bu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2120.2 {I10} in 1972Lu01 
RI$weighted average of 0.038 {I7} (1972Lu01) and 0.040 {I15} (1974Bu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp|?0.1, |a(exp)=0.30 {I5} (1963Re02), K/L=2.44 {I20} (1964Ra09), E3 is based on more reliable data from {+138}Pr |e decay (2.03 h) 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$74 {I4} 
M$D,E2 from comparison to RUL. |=D from comparison of T{-1/2}(2632) with T{-1/2}(2632)=96 ns calculated from assumption that 2632 is [({+140}Ce 4+)(|nh{-1}{+-}{-1}{+1}{-/2})]19/2- with T{-1/2}({+140}Ce 4+)=5 ns (1976Lu07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g=22 {I5} (1976Za03) would lead to a possible intensity imbalance at the 754 level (-24 {I10}) suggesting that either I|g from 1976Za03 is incorrect or 1089|g is misassigned. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|r{+2}=13.5|*10{+-3} {I13} (2005Ki02) 
TI ce(K)=1.52 {I15} if ce(K)(1596|g)=6.9 {I4} ({+140}La |b{+-}, 1967Ka12). More recent measurements of ce(K) are reflected in |r{+2}, but ce(K) was not given ({+140}La |e, 1984Ju01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.31 {I+34-14} (1985Di11), +1.15 {I+33-25} (1985Di11), +0.5 {I+6-2} (1993Go23), all in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$E1 in (|a,2n|g) and (n,n'|g). Small M2 admixture |d=-0.044 {I20} (1991Ch05) in |b- decay is incompatible with recommended upper limit (RUL) for B(M2)(W.u.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$the original unc of +0.26 {I2} (1991Ch05, in {+140}La |b{+-} decay) was increased by evaluator because of exceeding RUL limit 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1982Ad02. Others: 1596.170 {I25} (1970Ke06), 1596.20 {I4} (1968Gu05) 
M |a(K)=0.00069, |a(L)exp=0.000071 {I11}, |a(M+...)exp=0.000012 {I3} (1991Ch05), K/L=8.2 {I10}, |a(K)exp(pair)/|a(K)exp=0.156 {I15} (1968Be57) 
RI I|g=100 {I8} in 1977De34 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI,M ce(K)=0.013 {I1}, ce(L)=0.0013 {I2}, ce(M+N)=0.00035 {I6}, K/L=10 {I1} (1991Ch05); ce(K)=0.0152 {I15}; K/L=8.4 {I14}; |a(K)exp>11 (1967Ka12) (if ce(K)(1596|g)=0.069 {I3}); I|g<0.0014 (1982Ad02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0095 {I5}, |a(L)exp=0.0013 {I1}, |a(M+...)exp=0.00040 {I4} (1991Ch05); K/L=6.0 {I4} (1967Ka12) 
MR |d=-0.005 {I20} (E2+(M3)) (1991Ch05) 
E 487.15 {I25} (1979Bo26) 
RI I|g=48.16 {I40}, I|g=45.9% {I4} in 1977De34, 0.045 {I3} (1980Ka32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
RI$from I(2083|g)/I(487|g)=0.000254 {I15} (1978Fa03); others: I|g=0.031 {I2} (1991Ch05), 0.007 {I2} (1982Ad02), 0.045 {I3} (1980Ka32) 
M |a(K)exp=9.78|*10{+-3} {I84}, K:L1:M1=63:9:2 (1958Ba39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1967Ka12 
RI from 1982Ad02 
M L1:L2:L3=<0.02:0.68 {I3}:1.00 (1967Ka12) 
TI$from I|g and calculated |a. 1967Ka12 report I(|g+ce)=0.32% {I4} presumably from ce(L); however, value of ce(L) is not given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I4} (1991Ch05); K/L>4.6 (1967Ka12); K/L=3.6 (1958Ba39) 
MR others: +0.36 {I3} (1982Mi03), 0.30 {I+7-2} (1973Sa01), +0.37 {I6} (1980Ka32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 241.966 {I12} (1966Ba36), 241.961 {I22} (1967Ka12) 
M |a(K)exp=0.07 {I1}; K/L=7.4 {I10} (1967Ka12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.06 {I1}; K/L=6.5 {I10} (1967Ka12) 
M E1+M2 from linear pol-|g|g(|q) (1976Ga12) was based on value of |d=+0.39 {I5} 
MR others: +0.39 {I5} (1976Ga12); however, +20 {I+43-8} (1982Mi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E others: 328.746 {I25} (1979Bo26), 328.752 {I30} (1968Gu05), 328.745 {I15} (1970Ke06) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.038 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0046 {I5}, |a(M+N)exp=0.0010 {I2} (1991Ch05); 
$K/L=7.4 {I3}, K:L1:M1=100:16:3 (1967Ka12) 
MR from 1982Mi03. Others: -0.04 {I1} or -0.07 {I1} (1991Ch05), -0.04 {I2} (1973Sa01) 
RI I|g=21.74 {I19} in 1977De34 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
E other: 815.735 {I40} (1970Ke06) 
M |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I4}; |a(L)exp=0.0006 {I1} (1991Ch05), K/L=7.0 {I12} (1967Ka12) 
MR others: +0.007 {I9} (1982Mi03), -0.04 {I1} (1976Ga12,1973Sa01), -0.031 {I5} (1971Wi23), -0.0 (1980Ka32) 
RI I|g=24.78 {I18} in 1977De34 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I2} (1991Ch05) 
MR$M2 mixing not adopted because is incompatible with the recommended upper limit (RUL) for B(M2)(W.u.). Values: -0.044 {I20} (1991Ch05), +0.04 {I2} (1982Mi03), -0.034 {I7} (1976Ga12), +0.25 {I2} (1973Sa01), -0.031 {I5} (1971Wi23), -0.00 {I5} (1980Ka32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.50 {I3}; K/L=5.6 {I6}, L:L2:L3=8.9 {I25}:0.9 {I2}:1.0 (1967Ka12) 
MR from 1982Mi03. Others: +0.15 {I18} (1991Ch05), -0.33 {I4} (1976Ga12) 
E from 1966Ba36 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.019 {I1} (1991Ch05,1967Ka12); K/L=6.7 {I9} (1967Ka12) 
MR$adopted value (from (n,n'|g), 1993Go23); others: -0.54 {I5} 1982Mi03 (for J=3); -0.57 {I5} (1976Ga12), -0.55 {I1} (1973Sa01), -0.36 {I2} (1971Wi23); -0.37 {I8} or -0.41 {I6} (1991Ch05) (for J=3+); |d=+0.05 {I1} or +0.13 {I+18-15} (1991Ch05) (for J=4+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$adopted value (from (n,n'|g), 1993Go23); M1+E2 from a(K)exp=0.0025 {I6} (1991Ch05) not adopted becasue it results in ambiguous J|p for parent level. 
MR$if M1+E2: +2.6 {I4} (1982Mi03, for J=3); +1.9 {I+5-4} (1991Ch05) (for J=3+); |d=+0.07 {I10} (1991Ch05) (for J=4+); -0.08 {I+6-2} (1973Sa01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI others: 0.049 {I6} (1980Ka32), |?0.045 (1970Ka18), 0.044 {I22} (1968Ba18), 0.014 {I3} (1982Ad02) 
M |a(K)exp<0.16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I3} (1991Ch05); K/L=9 {I3} (1967Ka12); |a(pair)/|a(K)exp=1.82 {I10} (1968Be57) 
MR others: -0.10 {I4} (1982Mi03), -0.15 {I7} (1973Sa01), -0.16 {I+7-6} (1980Ka32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I9} 
MR from 1982Mi03. Others: +0.06 {I7} (1991Ch05), +0.10 {I3} (1976Ga12), +0.06 {I+3-1} (1980Ka32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp>172 (I|g|<0.1, ce(K)=17.2 {I4}) (1982Ad02), K/L=5.55 {I15} (1968Ab17). Others: K/L=7.40 {I34}, M/L=0.24 {I3} (1962Ba57), K/L=6.20 {I14} (1964Hi03); ce(K)(1903|g)/|b{++}=0.00152 {I3} (1968Ab17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g from Adopted Levels, Gammas 
RI$from I|g(2547.5|g) and relative branching ratio from Adopted Levels, Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g from Adopted Levels, Gammas 
RI$from I|g(2899.61|g) and relative branching ratio from Adopted Levels, Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M E1 from |a(K)exp (1979BiZN) is in disagreement with |DJ=1, |D|p=no as deduced from J|p's assigned by 1984En01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.030 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4} (1985Di11) 
$pol=1.12 {I+12-18} (1993Go23) 
MR$from 1985Di11. Other values: +0.5 {I+6-2} (1993Go23); +1.15 {I+33-25} (1985Di11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$based on |g(|q) and lin pol 1993Go23 conclude |DJ=1, pure M1; if M1(+E2), |d=-0.19 {I10} (1993Go23), |d=-0.04 {I+3-6} (1985Di11) 
$pol=0.70 {I+8-16} (1993Go23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$based on |g(|q) and lin pol 1993Go23 conclude |DJ=1, pure M1; if M1(+E2), |d=-0.069 {I15} (1993Go23), |d=-0.04 {I4} (1985Di11). Note that in {+140}La |b decay (1982Mi03) |d=+20 {I+43-8} 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I8} (1985Di11) 
$pol=0.67 {I+8-13} (1993Go23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$ other value: -0.06 {I+3-2} (1985Di11) 
$A{-2}=-0.26 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1985Di11) 
$pol=0.54 {I+9-12} (1993Go23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$other value: +5.1 {I5} (1985Di11) 
$A{-2}=+0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} (1985Di11) 
$pol=1.20 {I+20-25} (1993Go23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$other value: +0.78 {I15} (1985Di11) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} (1985Di11) 
$pol=2.3 {I5} (1993Go23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$stretched dipole based on |g(|q) more likely electric based on lin pol (by evaluator) 
$pol=1.4 {I5} (1993Go23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$791|g from 3/2- to (9/2-,11/2-) is highly unlikely; it is possible that this |g originates from 2165, 11/2-,9/2- level in which case in (d,p),(d,p|g) dataset the 2165 doublet is rather observed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from (d,p|g) (1976Pi15), not observed in (n,|g) (1970Ge03) 
RI I(1197|g)/I(1674|g)=4.1 (1976Pi15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$+0.55 {I+40-54} (1983Wo09). Other: +0.71 {I7} (1977CoZO); data of 1982Mi01 and 1975Ba15 are not consistent with J=2, data of 1983Wo09 agree better with J=1 or 3. -0.19 {I+14-10} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.93 {I+28-22} (1982Mi01). Others: -0.79 {I3} (1977CoZO), -1.2 {I+3-4} (1983Wo09), -1.06 {I13} (1975Ba15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.55 {I+40-54} (1983Wo09). Other: +0.71 {I7} (1977CoZO); data of 1982Mi01 and 1975Ba15 are not consistent with J=2, data of 1983Wo09 agree better with J=1 or 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI In the Table 1 in 1995Va25 authors give branching ratio 2160-|g as 56 and 2800-|g as 11, but it seems to be a misprint as data from (|g,|g') and La |b- decay show that 2800-|g is more intensive 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from 1986RoZU 
M K/L=0.8 {I2} (1978Pf02) 
E from ce(K), ce(L), ce(M) observed only in ce spectra (1978Pf02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$doubtful transition from {+146}La |b decay (6 s) (1982ShZV), it should be seen also in 9.8 s |b decay of {+146}La but it is not measured (1993Sh10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Very small value of A{-4} in the cascade 666|g-258|g indicates pure dipole transition (1983Wo03). 
RI 90; 5.7% {I6} (1984So18) I|g(666.1)/I|g(924.6)=1.28 in {+146}La (9.8 s) decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Very small value of A{-4} in the cascade 702|g-258|g indicates pure dipole transition (1983Wo03). 
RI 101; 6.4% {I6} (1984So18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981GoZN. I|g<1 in 6.1 s |b{+-} decay (1982ShZV). In 9.8 s |b{+-} decay (1993Sh10) the transition 1064.6 keV was not determined from as this level but depopulates 2446 keV level with I|g=3.1. In 6.1 s |b{+-} decay, E|g=1064 keV depopulates also the 2446 keV level with I|g<1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$the transition connects the levels with J|p's (4+) and 1-, it is likely doubtful transition as it should be seen in the {+146}La |b decay (9.8 s), but it is not measured (1993Sh10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.10 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1}, 410|g-258|g(E2) cascade (2000Ya08) 
$A{-2}=0.105 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I14}, 410|g-258|g(E2) cascade (1983Wo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1}, 666|g-258|g(E2) cascade (2000Ya08) 
$A{-2}=-0.261 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, 666|g-258|g(E2) cascade (1983Wo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}, 702|g-258|g(E2) cascade (2000Ya08) 
$A{-2}=-0.071 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4}, 702|g-258|g(E2) cascade (1983Wo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=0.96 {I13}, 785|g-258|g(E2) cascade (2000Ya08) 
$A{-2}=0.31 {I9}, A{-4}=1.02 {I20}, 785|g-258|g(E2) cascade (1983Wo03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=0.35 {I9}, 1016|g-258|g(E2) cascade. The 2{+nd} value |d=0.54 {I7} (2000Ya08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I12}, 1318|g-258|g(E2) cascade. The 2{+nd} value |d=-0.05 {I4} (2000Ya08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.36 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3}, 639|g-503|g(E2) cascade. The 2{+nd} value |d=2.37 {I+32-26} (2000Ya08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp); |DJ=+2 relative to daughter level based on the argument that fission populates predominantly yrast states (1997Ho11); M1+E2 not excluded (1997Ho11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g|g(|q) and syst for |b-vibrational levels in A|?150 deformed nuclei ({+148}La |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$295.4 (2006Ch24), 294.9 (1995Ha20) 
$(295.1|g)(158.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.046 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I9} (2009Go09, IPAC) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$this |g is labeled as 378 as well as 387 in spectral Fig. 2 of 2017Li06. Note that there is also a 378|g from 1369 to 990 levels in {+148}Ce populated in {+148}La decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$(777.4|g)(158.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.15 {I8}, A{-4}=0.08 {I13}, (2021Wa42) 
M$(831.4|g)(158.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I6}, A{-4}=0.31 {I10}, (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$(295.1|g)(158.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.046 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I9} (2009Go09) 
M$(663.2|g)(295.2|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.24 {I8} (2021Wa42) 
M$(969.5|g)(295.2|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} (2021Wa42) 
M$(770.9|g)(295.2|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I2}, A{-4}=0.16 {I4}, (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$(777.4|g)(158.7|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.15 {I8}, A{-4}=0.08 {I13}, also |d(777.4|g)=3.3 {I13} (for 2|s) (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$(969.5|g)(295.2|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} (2021Wa42) 
M,MR$(363.3|g)(969.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, |d(969.5|g=14 {I10}, (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$(363.3|g)(969.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, (2021Wa42) 
M$(167.1|g)(363.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}, (2021Wa42) 
M$(411.7|g)(363.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.16 {I8}, A{-4}=0.15 {I14}, (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M$(167.1|g)(363.3|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}, (D) for 167.1|g (2021Wa42) 
M$(353.5|g)(167.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}, (D) for 167.1|g (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$(353.5|g)(167.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}, (2021Wa42) 
M$(444.6|g)(353.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5}, (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$(444.6|g)(353.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5}, (2021Wa42) 
M$(536.3|g)(444.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5}, (2021Wa42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$from |b{+-} decay. Value of 35 {I11} from {+248}Cm SF decay is in poor agreement 
$Intrinsic dipole moment D{-0}=0.034 {I7} efm (2003Sy01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=135.6 {I2}, I|g/100 fissions=0.293 {I17} (1974ClZX,1973ClZV). 
$T{-1/2}=3.5 ns {I5} (1974ClZX) for 135.3|g is proposed (2003Sy01) as half-life of 206.6 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference; transition required from |g|g coin data 
TI$from 2002Sy01, deduced from intensity balance of |g-transitions observed in the singles and coincidence spectra. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
E$|DE assumed by evaluator on the basis of 1996Ge12 data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|g(|q): A{-2}=0.09 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I5}, mult.=E2 in the Table 1 of 1993We05, but A{-2} value does not support E2 assignment. Possible, A{-2} value is a misprint: this transition is a stretched quadrupole in |ph{-11/2} band 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A 192.7|g with I|g=3.5 {I12} was reported from this level by 1988Sh17, but not confirmed by 1998Pe05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.49 {I16}, |a(L)exp=0.075 {I23}, |a(M)exp=0.092 {I30}, L/K=0.13 {I4}, M/K=0.035 {I10} and M/L=0.30 {I10}; |a(K)exp=0.32 {I7}, |a(L)exp=0.041 {I9} and |a(M)exp=0.014 {I7} (1989Li22) 
MR$calculated by evaluators with BrIccmixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.16 {I20} 
E$from 1988Hi04; doublet with 476.3 {I3} from 1648.2 level 
RI$in 1988Hi04 I|g=20 {I2} for doublet of the 476.3|g + 476.4|g 
M$702.5 (11/2+) state de-excites to 225.9 (7/2+) one by stretched E2 476.6|g; these states relate to hard established rotational band. In 1998Hi04 mult.=E2(+M1) from |a(exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1988Hi04; doublet with 476.45 |g from 701.9 level 
RI$in 1988Hi04 I|g=20 {I2} for doublet of the 476.3|g + 476.4|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.07 {I20} 
E$in the table 1 of 1988Hi04 E|g=399.72 that is interpreted as 399.7 {I2} by the evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$Proposed by 2003Ro09; the transition is dipole based on |g(|q), while the level T{-1/2} value points at change of parity between the connecting levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$this |g-ray is not well resolved from x rays, thus its photon intensity of 220 {I33} given by 1973Co32 is not reliably determined. The value given here is deduced (by evaluators) from intensity balance 
M$|a(exp)=(1.7 {I5}) from 1973Co32 is consistent with M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.35 {I6} gives M1,E2; |d: 0.94 {I13} from K/L=4.6 {I17}, +0.45 {I20} from |g(|q) in (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.100 {I15}, K/L=6.9 {I29}. |a(K)exp is higher by |?20% than |a(K)(M1). |d: <0.8 (from K/L=6.9 {I29}), +0.25 {I5} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
This |g may be contributed by an impurity, since expected I|g=0.3 {I1} (from adopted gammas); and |a(K)exp<0.01 gives E1 but |DJ|p requires M1,E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I3} gives M1,E2; |g(|q) consistent with |DJ=1, dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I10} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.016 {I3} gives M1,E2. |d=+20 {I15} is also possible but less likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.36 {I10} is larger by a factor of |?2 than |a(K)(M1) or |a(K)(E2). The assignment here is from adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.35 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.17 {I17} 
M$|a(K)exp(441.2|g+442.7|g)=0.016 {I5} consistent with M1,E2 for doublet; |g(|q) consistent with |DJ=1 with |d<+0.04, >-0.2 or -5.5 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7} 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0044 {I13} is lower by a factor of |?2 than |a(K)(E2). |a(K)exp agrees with |a(K)(E1), also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$ 0.3 9 (1985Ko18) SEEMS A MISPRINT 
This transition (to (15/2-)) is considered as uncertain (evaluators) due to poor fit in level scheme and improbable |DJ=3,4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp in {+136}Nd |e decay 
M$other: D from R(DCO) and M1 from intensity balance in {+110}Pd({+30}Si,p3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+110}Pd({+30}Si,p3n|g). 
M$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+110}Pd({+30}Si,p3n|g), non-zero value of delta favors M1+E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=70.4 {I70} 
M$A{-2}=-0.285 {I18}, A{-4}|?0 (1993Ba42) 
M$D from |g(|q), M1 from I|g(417|g)/I|g(131|g)=1.51 {I5}, compared to theoretical values of 1.10 and 1.57 for E1 and M1 multipolarities, respectively (1993Ba42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=2.9 {I3} 
M$experimental intensity ratio for the 43.9|g and 46.8|g, corrected for branching, is best reproduced assuming E1 for the former and E2 for the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=1.9 {I2} 
E,RI$The 311.7|g is indicated as a doublet transition in 1996Pe12; it is unplaced in their Table 1, but placed as a transition depopulating the 351.9-keV level in Figure 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=6.0 {I6} 
M$A{-2}=-0.31 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I7} (1996Pe12) 
M$large A{-4} value indicates |DJ=0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(delayed)=100 {I10} 
M,MR$from 1993Ba42. Non-zero value of |d favors M1+E2 assignment (1993Ba42). 
M$A{-2}=-0.091 {I7}, A{-4}|?0 (1993Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I12} (1996Pe12) 
M$R(DCO)=0.45 {I10} for dipole gated is inconsistent with Q multipolarity and perhaps is typo. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
%I|g=17.2 {I9}, using the calculated normalization. 
M |a(L)exp=0.36 {I9} (1975Kl02) gives |d|<0.2; K/L=4.7 {I5} (1975Kl02) gives |d=0.3 {I5}, |d=0.11 {I2} (1975AlYU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1992Dr04. Shown in their figure but not in the table of 1989Xu01. 
RI$from I|g(563 from 11/2-)/I|g(332 from 11/2-)=0.19 {I13} (1992Dr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.125 {I20}, |a(L)exp=0.021 {I5} (1981AbZV) 
E$199.0 {I2}, I|g=18 {I3} relative to I(325.4|g)=100 (1971JuZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.65 {I15}, |a(L)exp=0.078 {I20} (1981AbZV) 
E$125.9 {I5}, I|g=4.7 {I7} relative to I(325.4|g)=100 (1971JuZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.50 {I11}, |a(L)exp=0.084 {I21} (1981AbZV) 
E$132.6 {I1}, I|g=7.1 {I2} relative to I(325.4|g)=100 (1971JuZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.21 {I9} (1981AbZV) 
E$214.8 {I3} doublet, I|g=10 {I1} relative to I(325.4|g)=100 (1971JuZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.096 {I22} (1981AbZV) 
E$214.8 {I3} doublet, I|g=10 {I1} relative to I(325.4|g)=100 (1971JuZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.024 {I12} (1981AbZV) 
E$540.8 {I3}, I|g=1.9 {I4} relative to I(325.4|g)=100 (1971JuZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 6.2 {I3} (2005Ga14) 
M$DCO(D)=1.02 {I14} (2005Ga14) indicates D+Q, but inconsistent with level-spin difference of (10-) to (8-). Note that there is a 251.7|g with Mult.=M1+E2 from the 3050 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp, conversion electron ratios, and |g|g(|q) in 5.5-h |e decay. 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in 5.5-h |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp, conversion electron ratios, and |g|g(|q) in 5.5-h |e decay. Stretched E2 from |g(|q) and |a(K)exp in ({+3}He,3n|g) discrepant. 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in 5.5-h |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$stretched dipole from |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g); M1(+E2), |d=0.0 {I1} from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in ({+3}He,3n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 41 {I12} in ({+3}He,3n|g); 6.7 {I14} in ({+19}F,4n|g); the latter is in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 5.5-h |e decay. 
RI$other: 3.7 {I3} from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
TI$from intensity balancing. Level not expected to be fed directly in |e decay (|DJ|p=2,no). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
$K:L:M+=18.8 {I19}:2.2 {I25}:0.50 {I8} 
M,MR$stretched E2 from |g(|q) and |a(K)exp in ({+3}He,3n|g) are discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M discrepant with E2+M3, |d=+0.20 {I4} from |g(|q), |a(K)exp, and conversion electron ratios in 5.5-h |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$existence of this transition is considered as questionable by the evaluators since with the given intensity it should have been seen in other studies. This |g is omitted in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset. Other explanation may be that this |g defined another level as suggested in the previous evaluation 2001Bu16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placed from 1941.5, (17/2)- by 1988Ar07. Alternate placement suggested by evaluators based on ({+3}He,3n|g) where no 1089|g was observed to deexcite 1941.5, (17/2)-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M observation of 27|g (not completely converted) (1976Fo08) suggest E1 or M1, shell model favor similar parity for the lowest levels of {+140}Pr 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2,E3)
decay_comment:
M$D,Q,E3 from comparison with RUL; E1,M2,E3 from different |p's for parent (764) and daughter (128) levels, from reaction L values and shell model; M2,E3 from independent parent-daughter J's (|DJ=2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M$deduced in ({+14}N,4n|g) (2005Yu05) based on (unobserved) transition in between (8-) and (7-) levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
RI$this |g ray is not resolved by 2008Sc17 in (n,n'|g) due to a background line and the branching ratio relative to 632|g was taken by the authors from 1994De56. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (|a,2n|g) 
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 |g in ({+7}Li,4n|g) (ADO ratio, 2015Li21); E2, |DJ=2 |g in (|a,2n|g) (|a(K)exp, |a(L)exp, angular correlations). |DJ=1 |g sustained by D+Q, |DJ=1 {I509}.7|g decaying this level and ultimately by (|a,2n|g) data with very mixed M1+E2 |g, which is adopted here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 2000He14. Others: 145.440 {I3} (1970Gr13), 145.444 {I20} (1979Bo26) 
M |a(K)exp=0.376 {I8}, |a=0.438 {I10} (weighted average of 0.439 {I13}, 0.436 {I17}), K/L=7.29 {I24}, K/L+=5.78 {I18} (1979Ha09), L1:L2:L3=1000:78.0 {I11}:19.68 {I23} (1968Ge02); 1000:81 {I4}:17.2 {I25} (1965Ge04). Others: |a(K)exp=0.359 {I16} (1975Le09), 0.375 {I9} (1966Di02), 0.376 {I7} (1966Pa09); see also 1972Ca07, 1961Ne12, 1961Co04 |a=0.452 {I8},0.435 {I7} (1992Sc24), 0.439 {I13}, 0.436 {I17} (1979Ha09), 0.421 {I21} (1975Le09), 0.441 {I9} (1966Pa09), 0.440 {I11} (1966Di02) 
CC$weighted average of 0.452 {I8}, 0.435 {I7} (1992Sc24), 0.439 {I13}, 0.436 {I17} (1979Ha09), 0.421 {I21} (1975Le09), 0.441 {I9} (1966Pa09), 0.440 {I11} (1966Di02). |a(calculated)=0.449 {I6} 
MR$from 1979Ha21 from |a measurement determining penetration parameter and mixing ratio (graphical analysis). Others: +0.068 {I8} (1962Sc11), +0.066 {I22} (1963Ha07) 
Penetration parameter=1.2 {I6} (1979Ha21). Other: 1973Ra41 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from {+141}Ce |b{+-} decay 
M |a(K)exp=0.376 ({+141}Ce |b{+-} decay) used for normalization of |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E from 1988Ch39 
M A{-2}=-0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3}, pol=-0.22 {I6}, |a(K)exp=0.35 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.071 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E from 1988Ch39 
M A{-2}=+0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}, |a(K)exp=6.85|*10{+-3}, |a(L)exp=0.0010 {I1}, pol=-0.18 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from A{-2}=-0.13 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.24 {I15} contradicts Q from A{-2}=+0.15 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2} in (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.09 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.68 {I16}, for 273.7|g+272.7|g |a(K)exp=0.069 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.011 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5}, pol=+0.21 {I4}, |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I2}, |a(L)exp=2|*10{+-4} {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.39 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I10}, |a(K)exp=0.084 {I12}; M1,E2 from 1981Pr09 but |a(K)exp is smaller than both calculated coefficients 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.05 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.23 {I10}, for 272.7|g+273.7|g |a(K)exp=0.069 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.011 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.35 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I14}, pol=+0.50 {I20}; 1981Pr09 adopted (M1) but E2(+M1) |DJ=0 transition fits better with measured A{-2}, A{-4} and pol values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6}, pol=+0.30 {I10}, |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I2}, |a(L)exp=3|*10{+-4} {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}, pol=+0.08 {I7}, |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I5}, |a(L)exp=9|*10{+-4} {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.25 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I11}, pol=-0.42 {I18}, |a(K)exp=86|*10{+-4} {I12}, |a(L)exp=19|*10{+-4} {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E1)=0.53|*10{+-5} {I5}, B(M1)=0.048 {I5} or B(E1)=0.16|*10{+-5} {I4}, B(M1)=0.014 {I4}, depending on alternative placements of |g rays. 
RI$ other: 100 for alternate placements of |g-rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E1)=0.35|*10{+-5} {I5}, B(M1)=0.032 {I4} or B(E1)=0.14|*10{+-5} {I4}; B(M1)=0.013 {I4}, depending on alternative placements of |g rays. 
RI$ other: 100 for alternate placements of |g-rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.90 {I+31-20} or -29 {I+7-6} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0026 {I+14-12} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.0 {I+28-16} or 9.0 {I+25-16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-5 {I+2-6} or -0.48 {I+12-26} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})<0.0001 or 0.0006 {I+3-2} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2 {I+4-3} or 0.22 {I+22-12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.053 {I+22-26} or +8.9 {I+17-19} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0050 {I11} or 0.0001 {I1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.03 {I+5-2} or 9.6 {I+22-16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.26 {I+13-11} or +2.2 {I+7-5} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.001 {I2} or 0.0002 {I1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.12 {I+16-8} or 1.5 {I+4-3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.23 {I6} or <-7.9 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0007 {I1} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.05 {I4} or 1.00 {I+18-15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E2 listed by 2008Sc17 is incorrect in view of 1/2+ to 1/2+ transition 
$ Final J|p should be 1/2+, not 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.11 {I13} or +3.5 {I+28-12} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.010 {I7} or 0.0007 {I+18-6} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.8 {I+19-3} or 225 {I+170-87} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.25 {I4} or +2.3 {I+4-3} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0006 {I4} or 0.0001 {I1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.04 {I+5-2} or 0.63 {I+44-20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.52 {I+28-21} or -2.8 {I+1-4} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0003 {I2} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.10 {I+12-7} or 0.41 {I+26-15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.57 {I+16-23} or -4.6 {I+17-44} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0004 {I3} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.14 {I+17-8} or 0.44 {I+36-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.31 {I+14-16} or -5 {I+2-11} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.005 {I4} or 0.0002 {I+7-2} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=9 {I+24-8} or 100 {I+86-42} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.01 {I+62-4} or +10 {I+11-4} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.043 {I+24-20} or 0.0004 {I+12-4} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<1.1 or 182 {I+104-85} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00062 {I56} 
$ Final J|p of 9/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 7/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1651.3 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.40 {I+19-21} or -4 {I+2-9} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0009 {I8} or 0.0001 {I+3-1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.5 {I+45-15} or 10 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.49 {I+6-8} or -3.4 {I+6-8} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0007 {I4} or 0.0001 {I1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.15 {I+15-10} or 0.71 {I+45-41} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$ Final J|p of 7/2,9/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 7/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1651.3 level 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})|<0.0096 
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<176 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$ this |g ray is not resolved by 2008Sc17 due to a background line, the branching ratio has been taken by the authors from 2001Tu02. 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})<0.049 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<365 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0014 {I3} 
$ Final J|p of 9/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 7/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1651.3 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.37 {I+11-12} or -5 {I+2-5} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0001 {I1} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.01 {I+3-1} or 0.10 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$ Final J|p of 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 1/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1298.4 level 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})|<0.0033 
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<11.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.16 {I+31-23} or <-7.9 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0015 {I7} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.06 {I+8-4} or 1.1 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$ 40.(12) quoted by 2008Sc17 looks like a typographical error. The value given here was calculated by evaluator from 100-(summed branches for other transitions) 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})|<0.0145 
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<45.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
M$ E1 listed by 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 5/2- to 1/2+ transition 
$ Final J|p of 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 1/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1298.4 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.40 {I+22-41} or <-1.8 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0001 {I1} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.01 {I+4-1} or 0.06 {I+7-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.4 {I+20-2} or +1.6 {I+8-13} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0003 {I3} or 0.0001 {I+5-1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<0.35 0R 0.16 {I+21-16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.22 {I+47-22} or +2.4 {I+29-13} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.005 {I+2-3} or 0.0008 {I+25-8} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<60 or 14 {I+7-8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+0.06 {I8} or +4.1 {I+16-11} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0025 {I6} or 0.0001 {I+2-1} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.01 {I3}-1 or 1.4 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.18 {I8} or <-4.9 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.016 {I+9-7} or 0.0002 {I+8-2} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.7 {I+14-6} or 22 {I+12-9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})|<0.0085 
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<14.0 
$ Final J|p of 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 1/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1298.4 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.04 {I+16-14} or +7 {I+57-4} 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})=0.0021 {I12} or <0.0001 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<0.01 or 1.0 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$ 781.84 in tables II and III of 2008Sc17 seems a misprint 
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})|<0.0006 
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<0.27 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(|m{+2}{-N})|<0.015 
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<38 
$ Final J|p of 9/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 7/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1651.3 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)|<300 
$ Final J|p of 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 5/2+,7/2+ listed as initial J|p for 2315.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ Final J|p of 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 1/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1298.4 level 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0004 {I+8-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Final J|p of 5/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 1/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1298.4 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Final J|p of 1/2+ as in table III of 2008Sc17 is inconsistent with 5/2+ listed as initial J|p for 1292.4 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.00076 {I10}, A{-2}=+0.15 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2}, contradict A{-2}=-0.13 {I10} in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$J|p=13/2- for the initial level in Table II of 2015Li21 seems a misprint; 13/2+ in the level scheme (Fig. 1) is in agreement with adopted value (based on different measurements) 
$ADO=1.03 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ADO=1.31 {I26} 
M$Q transition based on ADO adopted as E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ADO=1.10 {I25} 
M$Q transition based on ADO adopted as E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.66 {I12} 
M$D+Q transition based on ADO adopted as M1+E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.95 {I38} 
M$D or Q transition based on ADO adopted as M1+E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.68 {I10} 
M$D+Q transition based on ADO adopted as M1+E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.99 {I19} 
M$Q transition based on ADO adopted as M1+E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.64 {I12} 
M$D+Q transition based on ADO adopted as M1+E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ADO=0.30 {I7} 
M$D+Q transition based on ADO adopted as M1+E2 by 2015Li21 as based on level scheme placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R{-ADO}=0.42 {I15} 
M$|DJ=1, M1+E2 with a negative mixing ratio suggested by authors from R{-ADO} value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$BM1W=0.00371 11$BE2W=1.0 4 
M |a(K)exp=5.64 {I34}; L1:L2:L3=1000:91.0 {I17}:27.2 {I7} (1968Ge02) 
MR from L1:L2:L3 (1968Ge02), sign from |g|g(|q) (1975Ch31) 
RI 12.3% {I3} (1982Ge03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$BM1W=0.0081 16$BE2W=32 8 
RI 42.8% {I4} (1982Ge03). Others: 42.6% (1957Ma16), 41.3% (1971Lu05) 
M K/L=6.04 {I13}, L1:L2:L3=1000:177 {I10}:14 {I6} (1968Ge02), |a(K)exp=0.053 {I4} (1989Ku13) 
MR from L1:L2:L3 (1968Ge02), sign from |g|g(|q) (1975Ch31). Others: 1974Ve07, 1966Su06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
E from 1960Ge05 
RI,TI$from I(ce) of 1960Ge05 and |a(L)/(1+|a). Others: I|g|?0.01 (1970An15), 0.03 {I1}(1976Ra22), |<0.01 (1984Da13) 
M L1/L2=6.43 {I32}, L1/L3=0.662 {I8} (1969Ge01) s; L1:M1:M3:N= 100:29 {I3}:42 {I4}:16.7 {I18} (1960Ge05) s; |a(L)exp|?610 (1970An15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.5 {I5} (1970An15) (K| x ray)/I|g, |a(L)exp=0.31 {I4} (1970An15); L1/L2=12.2 {I3}, L1/L3=59.6 {I30} (1969Ge01) s; L1:M1:N=100:22 {I8}:7.2 {I25} (1960Ge05) s 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from intensity balance as no direct |b{+-} feeding is expected, |DJ=3. Measured I|g: 1.38 {I20} (1984Da13), 3.6 {I4} (1976Ch33), 4.6 {I23} (1970Fa03), 4.4 {I15} (1970An15), 5 {I4} (1970Po09) 
M |a(L)exp=1.8 {I6} (1970An15) L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N= 100:8.5 {I33}:<4:21 {I4}:3 {I3}:4.3 {I22} (1960Ge05) 
MR from |g|g(|q) (1968Ma24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.4 {I5} (1970An15); |a(L)exp=0.82 {I30} (1970An15); L1:L2:L3:M= 100:183 {I87}:192 {I90}: <333 (1960Ge05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp=4.5 {I12} (1970An15); L1:L2:L3:M1:N=100:6.4 {I49}: <4.7: 18.2 {I21}:3 {I3} (1960Ge05) 
MR -0.006 {I20} from |g|g(|q) (1963Bh11,1963Iw02,1967Gu17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=6.6 {I5} (1970An15) (K| x ray)/I|g, |a(L)exp=0.98 {I10} (1970An15); L1:L2:L3:M1=100:7.9 {I53}: <5:24 {I10} (1960Ge05) 
MR 0.052 {I80} (1975Ba32) |g|g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$others: 133.528 {I13} (1979Bo26), 133.515 {I5} (1978Mo22) 
M |a(K)exp=0.54 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.075 {I15} (1970An15); L1/L2=13.4 {I2}, L1/L3=64.3 {I17} (1969Ge01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI from 1989Ba14. Others: 21.0 {I10} (1979Ta17), 26 (1978Pf02), 14.1 {I14} (1977Bj02); however, 1980Ya07 report I|g=46 {I3} 
M |a|?4 (1978Pf02) if all observed x rays are from conversion of 62.54|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI part of the triplet with I|g=7.36 {I5} (1989Ba14) 
M |a(K)exp=0.027 {I7} for the triply-placed 350.9|g requires mult=M1 or E2 for 350.9|g from 350.9 level and is consistent with mult=E1, E2, M1 for other placements 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$0.22 {I12} from intensity balance; no |b{+-} feeding 
ECC$67 {I38} deduced by the evaluators from I(|g+ce)=21 {I12}; value of |a is consistent with M1 mult. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce); 2.0 {I1} from 1980Ya07 
ECC$|a(L)exp=9.1 {I30}, |a(M)exp=1.9 {I7} (from L/M=4.8 {I1}, |a(L)exp+|a(M)exp=11 {I4} (1968Ho16)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
ECC$0.203 {I23} deduced by the evaluators from intensities balance at 100.88 keV level which is consistent with E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$I|g=56.2% {I30} (1984So18), I|g=55.0% {I18} (1983Ge11) 
$|a(K)=0.00971 used for the normalization 
M$from ce measurement by1968Ho16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$198.214 in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.175 {I5} in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$268.913 in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0140 {I4} in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39); M1+E2 (1981ScZM) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I11} for unresolved 359|g+359|g+361|g multiplet in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I11} for unresolved 359|g+359|g+361|g multiplet in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39); assignment made tentative by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I5} for unresolved 450|g+452|g multiplet (1993Ma39); assignment made tentative by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.087 {I8} in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39); comparing |a(K)exp with calculated values, E1 is least discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$374.313 in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.061 {I6} in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I15} in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39); comparing |a(K)exp with calculated values, E1 is least discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.317 {I13} in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39); (E2) more likely from |b{+-} feeding pattern 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4} for unresolved 579|g+580|g multiplet in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39); assignment made tentative by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.009 {I2} for unresolved 800|g+802|g multiplet in {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1993Ma39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I11} for unresolved 359|g+359|g+361|g multiplet (1993Ma39); assignment made tentative by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I5} for unresolved 450|g+452|g multiplet @ (1993Ma39); assignment made tentative by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.087 {I8} (1993Ma39); comparing |a(K)exp with calculated values, E1 is least discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I15} (1993Ma39); comparing |a(K)exp with calculated values, E1 is least discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I4} for unresolved 579|g+580|g multiplet (1993Ma39); assignment made tentative by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
ECC$from the intensities of the 138.7, 218.5, and 243.7 keV transitions in the 256/424 double gate (2015Wa28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$117.336 {I7} (1979Bo26) probably belongs to another nuclide (1983Ar15) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.98 {I9} (2004Ko05); |a(K)exp=0.6 {I2} (1983ChZG) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF (2010Rz02) 
E$from |b{+-} decay. Other: 58.5 {I3} in {+252}Cf SF 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$M1,E2 from total conversion coefficient in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF (2010Rz02), but (E2) from assigned J|p values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
EKC$ from intensities of 58|g, 35.9 and 40.7 keV K-x rays of Pr 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=2.6|*10{+-5} {I2} deduced by 2010Rz02 using a T{-1/2}=22.9 ns 18. b(E1) rates and deduced electric dipole moments in neighboring nuclides and from predictions of QRPM calculations are discussed in 2010Rz02. T{-1/2} in the Adopted Levels is 23.4 ns {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.8~{I5}, the calculated |a(K) for M1 is 0.84 and for E1=0.16, due to the large |a(K)exp uncertainty, the multipolarity assignment is somewhat uncertain. 1986Fo05 gives M=E1 without providing arguments and that assignment is retained. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$2015Wa28 state that intensity of 143.7|g is weaker than that of 190.2|g, that is the reason for its uncertain placement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Identification with {+151}Pr from fragment-fragment-X|g coincidences (1974ClZW). |g yield per {+252}Cf(SF)=0.00177~{I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp and |a(M)exp, obtained from weighted average of results using two methods: 1. comparison of |g-ray and electron peaks. 2. from absolute intensity of 35.1|g. These data were obtained from the LOHENGRIN experiment 
$ Deduced dipole moment D{-0}=9.0|*10{+-4} efm {I13} (2012Ma13) suggests no evidence of strong octupole collectivity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$Measured using the Si(Li) detector 
BE1W$Value determined by compiler. Other: 9.6|*10{+-8} {I5} in 2018Al14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp = 0.93 {I12}, |a(L)exp = 0.32 {I11} and (K/L)exp=2.8 {I10} in 2018Al14. 
BE2W$Value determined by compiler. Other: 0.049 {I4} in 2018Al14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from {+152}Pr Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database. This |g was not seen by 2015Wa28 due to coincidence reslolving times in both experiments, window of 1 |ms in {+252}Cf SF decay experiment, and |?2 ns in the reaction experiment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=2.3 {I7} in 2010Hw03 is corrected to 3.2 {I9} in the Erratum to 2010Hw03, but reversed to 2.3 {I7} value in 2015Wa28 assuming 49.9- and 50.4-keV transitions have the same K-conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=3.2 {I9} (2010Hw03) 
$|a(exp)=2.3 {I7} in 2010Hw03 is corrected to 3.2 {I9} in the Erratum to 2010Hw03, but reversed to 2.3 {I7} value in 2015Wa28 assuming 49.9- and 50.4-keV transitions have the same K-conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M$RUL does not exclude mult.=M1 or =E2, but the transition states in the scheme between J|p=(7/2-) and J|p=(5/2+) states 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
DCO=0.81 {I9} 
M$R(DCO) value is rather large for mult.=D what is explained by relatively long T{-1/2}. RUL does not exclude mult.=M1 or =E2, but the transition states between J|p=7/2- and J|p+5/2+ levels. J|p assignments of this band were made on systematics of N=71 nuclei and in-band properties 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$ce(K)=1.5 {I3}, ce(L)=0.61 {I13}, |a(K)exp=0.33 {I10} and L/K=0.41 {I12} 
MR$Deduced by evaluators from ce(K), ce(L) and |a(K)exp and the BriccMixing program 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2$calculated by evaluators with RULER 
DCO=0.9 {I2} 
A{-2}=0.34 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4} (1995Me08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2$calculated by evaluators with RULER 
DCO=1.0 {I2} 
A{-2}=0.34 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4} (1995Me08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=3.8 {I7}, ce(L)=2.2 {I4}, ce(M)=0.57 {I9}, |a(K)exp=0.48 {I10}, L/K=0.55 {I15}, (M+N)/K=0.19 {I7}; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ce(K)=1.9 {I4}, ce(L)=0.62 {I7}, ce(M)=0.17 {I3}, |a(K)exp=0.22 {I5}, L/K=0.32 {I6}, (M+N)/K=0.089 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$A value of I|g=93 {I7} is quoted in 2017Pe03 with a reference to 2013Mc07, but no such a value is reported in the latter work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2+E3)
decay_comment:
E$From levels energy difference. E|g=874 keV is quoted in 2017Pe03. 
M$From |a(K)exp=0.005 {I2} (2017Pe03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
|g reported by 1989Vi04 only in {+135}Pm decay, with I|g(564|g)/I|g(366|g)=3.7 {i10}. It is considered uncertain by the evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$978.2 in (HI,xn|g) may be from some other level since the other two |g rays are not reported in (HI,xn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1989Vi04. Placement from 1989Ko07. Coincidence with 129|g (1989Vi04) does not support this placement. Unplaced in 1989Vi04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$includes |?6% intensity from an unresolved line from {+136}Pm 
A{-2}=-0.476 {i16}, A{-4}=-0.010 {i27} (1987Pi05) 
A2=-0.64 3 (1974Gi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
EKC$ from intensity branching ratios (1998Ae01). no evidence for E0 admixture was found within the sensitivity of the spectrometer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.28 {I3} (2007Mu14), 0.27 {I5} (2007MuZY) 
$I|g(399.0)/I|g(226.0)=5 {I1}/90 {I5} (2007MuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.28 {I3} (2007Mu14), 0.25 {I4} (2007MuZY) 
$I|g(508.0)/I|g(282.1)=8.7 {I14}/79 {I4} (2007MuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.28 {I4} (2007Mu14), 0.31 {I5} (2007MuZY) 
$I|g(591.0)/I|g(309.0)=18 {I3}/73 {I4} (2007MuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.29 {I4} (2007Mu14), 0.25 {I5} (2007MuZY) 
$I|g(682.0)/I|g(371.2)=22 {I4}/66 {I4} (2007MuZY) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Initial level=1520.4 in Table I of 2019Lv01 is a misprint 
MR$2020LvAA quote value from {+135}Nd Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Jan 2008 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement from e-mail reply of May 31, 2020. In Table I of 2019Lv01, this transition is shown from 23/2- to 19/2-, but in that paper 19/2- level at 2179 keV was not defined, whereas it is a member of D8 band in 2020LvAA. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$DCO(Q)=0.55 {I9} in 2019Lv01 is corrected to 0.84 {I28}; and multipolarity corrected to E2 from M1+E2 in e-mail reply, May 31, 2020. 
$Placement of 841.4 transition is listed as 29/2- to 27/2- in Table I of 2019Lv01. It should be 29/2- to 25/2- as in authors' level-scheme Fig. 1, and e-mail reply of May 31, 2020. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R{-ac}=1.39 {I17} 
$This |g ray and associated data are duplicated in Band D6 in Table I of 2019Lv01. This |g ray belongs only in band D5 as per e-mail reply of May 31, 2020 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$dipole suggested by data of 1987Pa17, but |DJ=2 suggested from |g|g(|q)(DCO) data of 1996Pe06 
$I|g(132|')/I|g(57|')=0.79 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of values in 1997Pe06, 1975No08 and 1971Va22. 
M$From {+137}Nd IT decay (1.60 s) (1971Va22, 1970Dr04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of values in 1997Pe06, 1975No08 and 1971Va22. 
M$From {+137}Pm |e decay (1975No08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$weighted average of 1997Pe06, 1975No08 and 1971Va22 values 
M$From {+137}Nd IT decay (1.60 s) (1971Va22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 233.4 {I2} {+110}Pd({+30}Si,3n|g), 233.4 {I3} {+140}Ce(|a,7n|g), 233.7 {I5} ({+137}Nd IT decay (1.60 s)), and 233.6 {I3} ({+137}Pm |e decay). 
M$From {+137}Nd IT decay (1.60 s) (1971Va22, 1970Dr04) and {+137}Pm |e decay (1975No08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp+|a(L+...)exp=1.4 {I2} (1971Va22), K/L+=2.8 (1970Dr04) 
|a: 1.28 {I26} from I(|g+ce) and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,(E2)
decay_comment:
M From |a(K)exp+|a(L+...)exp=0.29 {I1} (1971Va22). |a=0.36 {I15} deduced by evaluators from transition intensity balance at 286-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$possible decay out transition, however, intensity is too weak to account for entire intensity of Band O (2019Pe08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$2-point angular correlation (anisotropy) ratio =0.85 {I6} 
$Table 1 has a typo in J{+|p}{-i}in this row. 19/2+ would be consistent with Fig. 1 and with other row2023Re09s of table 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 520.9 {I2} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 520.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 520.8 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 520.1 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$also from ce data in {+138}Pm |e decay, |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) and {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g), |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 493.1 {I2} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 493.1 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 492.8 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: 100 {I1} from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$E2 from {+138}Pm |e decay based on ce data, M1+E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); E2(+M1) is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1014.0 {I3} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 1014.0 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 1013.3 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: 63 {I8} from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+138}Pm |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 729.0 {I2} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 728.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 729.0 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 728.3 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$also from ce data in {+138}Pm |e decay, |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) and {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g), ce data and |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 437.4 {I2} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 438.0 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 437.3 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: 100 {I4} from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$E2(+M1) from {+138}Pm |e decay based on ce data, M1+E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); E2(+M1) is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 930.6 {I2} from {+138}Pm |e decay and 929.6 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$from from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: 27.8 {I6} from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$M1(+E2) from {+138}Pm |e decay based on ce data, M1+E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); M1(+E2) is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: I|g=100 {I15} from 
M$E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: I|g=100 {I2} from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: 100 {I10} in {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$M1 from {+138}Pm |e decay based on ce data, E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 740.6 {I3} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 740.2 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 740.6 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 740.0 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$also from ce data in {+138}Pm |e decay, |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), ce data and |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 884.4 {I4} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 883.9 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 884.4 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 883.7 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) and {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g), ce data and |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 230.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 231.0 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$other: 29 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 972.1 {I3} from {+138}Pm |e decay, 971.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 972.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 971.7 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$M1(+E2) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g), {+141}Pr(p,4n|g). The results of 1994De11 in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) confirm a dipole nature, but it is interpreted as E1; ce data in {+138}Pm |e decay support dipole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay 
M$(M1) from {+138}Pm |e decay based on ce data, E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay 
M$M1+E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); D+Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) only 
M$E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 186.5 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 187.0 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$other: 4 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 331.5 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 331.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 330.3 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), ce data and |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g); RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 369.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 369.3 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 370.6 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$others: 12 {I8} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g), 5 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$M1+E2 from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO), (Q) from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); D+Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 469.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 469.6 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 469.0 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$others: 29 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g), 32 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$Other: Q from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 557.3 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 556.9 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 557.2 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
RI$others: 100 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g), 100 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$E1+M2 from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO), D(+Q) from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) based on |g(|q); D(+Q) is adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 701.2 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 701.2 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). Other: 5 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+138}Pm |e decay. Other: I|g=68 {I21} from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) 
M$E2 from {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); Q is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 658.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 659.1 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 972.9 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 973.5 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 972.9 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g), ce data and |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g), {+141}Pr(p,4n|g) data set, also observed in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 918.1 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 918.6 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$E2 from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and Q from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) based on |g|g(DCO); E2 is adopted based on band structure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 556.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 555.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), 555.5 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) based on |g(|q) and RUL; E2 from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) based on |g|g(|q); E2 is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 391.0 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 390.9 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$other: I(391.0|g)/I(676.9|g)=21/100 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) only 
RI$I(391.0|g)/I(676.9|g)=21/100 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 680.0 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 680.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$I(680.4|g)/I(676.9|g)=91/100 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 329.1 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 329.6 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$other: 31 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 453.6 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 453.6 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 452.9 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 646.9 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 647.1 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 646.4 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) and RUL in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 543.9 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 543.6 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$other: I(543.8|g/740.4|g)>6/100 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 668.0 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 668.3 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
RI$other: I(668.2|g/740.4|g)>23/100 from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 740.4 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 740.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 961.1 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 961.7 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 502.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 502.8 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 502.2 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) and RUL in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 978.2 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 978.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$other: Q from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 836.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 836.9 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$other: Q from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 803.1 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 803.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1117.3 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 1118.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1152.3 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 1153.2 {I4} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 1152.7 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 792.1 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 792.5 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 791.6 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) and RUL in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1206.7 {I10} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 1208.0 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 1207.6 {I5} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) and RUL in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 900.0 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 900.1 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 278.0 {I10} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 278.0 {I4} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 313.4 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 313.5 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1145.4 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 1146.6 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 440.2 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 440.1 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 494.7 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 494.7 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$other: Q from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 323.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 323.7 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 602.2 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 602.6 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 639.3 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 639.5 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$Other: Q from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 747.0 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 747.5 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 278.4 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 278.6 {I4} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1007.1 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 1007.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$other: Q from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 156.4 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 156.0 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 193.4 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 193.8 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1018.3 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 1019.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 846.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g), 847.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), and 846.5 {I3} from {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g), |g(|q) and RUL in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 230.6 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 230.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1156.4 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 1156.7 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 772.4 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 773.0 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 286.2 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 286.3 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 324.8 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 325.2 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 818.6 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 818.8 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 380.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 380.5 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 986.7 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 986.9 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$also from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 378.8 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 379.1 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 859.7 {I5} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 860.4 {I3} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 517.5 {I2} from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and 516.7 {I2} from {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g). 
M$D+Q from {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) and D from |g|g(DCO) in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1 from |a(K)exp=0.0060 {I10} (1981De38), |a(K)exp=0.0041 {I15} (1973VaYZ). This value is in conflict with the adopted J|p=(4+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.004 {I2} (1981De38), |a(K)exp=0.0018 {I6} (1973VaYZ); |a(K)exp is compatible with M1+E2 or E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$520.2 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$A{-2}=+0.15 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1975Yo01); A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (1980Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$728.1 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0028 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.19 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7} (1975Yo01); A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1980Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$739.7 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0016 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.05 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I11} (1975Yo01); A{-2}=-0.21 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I9} (1980Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$883.8 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0021 {I4}, A{-2}=+0.21 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I14} (1975Yo01); A{-2}=+0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1980Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$971.8 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$M1(+E2) from reanalysis of ce data of |a(K)exp=0.0018 {I6} for the 971.8|g in 1975Yo01 (1980Mu10). A Dipole value was adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$330.8 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.035 {I3}, A{-2}=+0.23 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I8} (1975Yo01); A{-2}=+0.17 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.015 (1980Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$971.8 {I5} (1975Yo01) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0018 {I6}, A{-2}=-0.02 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I18} (1975Yo01); A{-2}=-0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I9} (1980Mu10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M4
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. Other: measured I|g=2.3 {I2} (1971Bu22) relative to 100 for 738.2|g in {+139}Pr from 5.5-h {+139}Nd decay 
$K:L12:L3:M:N+=1000:251 {I21}:141 {I17}:96 {I16}:29 {I4} (1971Bu22) 
M$from K:L12:L3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ Initial level energy=4715.6 listed in table I of 2007Ku12 is a misprint according to e-mail reply from one of the authors. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from ({+48}Ca,4n|g); the more precise value in ({+18}O,4n|g) is discrepant (GTOL) 
MR$|d=-0.8 {I+5-|@} ({+126}Te({+18}O,4n|g, 1989Gu22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$contradictory arguments in ({+48}Ca,4n|g): M1+E2 in 2006PeZZ (based on DCO), while 12- to 11+ transition in 2005Pe24 (Fig. 1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|g measured in ({+18}O,4n|g) (1987Gu22) and ({+48}Ca,4n|g) (2005Pe24) from different parent levels; this placement is from ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 based on DCO (2005Pe24) also compatible with E1 - the latter better supported by theory (2006Pe25, 2013Le22) 
MR$-0.2 {I+2-14} if M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$(M1+E2) adopted 2013Le22 in ({+48}Ca,4n|g) should be (E1) according to their level scheme (2013Le22, Fig. 1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
BM2W$calculated value is 0.505 {I+35-31} but significatly converted 37|g would make this a limit even for a relatively small intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=5.1 {I6}, using the calculated normalization. 
E from 1974FiZF 
M$from K/L=6.3 {I10} (1973VaYZ); |a(K)exp=2.7|*10{+-3} {I5} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.59 {I10}, using the calculated normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp=5.4|*10{+-3} {I13} (1973VaYZ) 
$ |g|g(|q) for 639-774 cascade (2009Wi18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=0.88 {I12}, using the calculated normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp=3.9|*10{+-3} {I6} (1973VaYZ) 
$ |g|g(|q) for 716-774 cascade (2009Wi18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
%I|g=1.15 {I13}, using the calculated normalization. 
M$from |a(K)exp=6.1|*10{+-4} {I49} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 based on DCO (2005Pe24) also compatible with E1 - the latter better supported by theory (2006Pe25, 2013Le22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R=0.67 {I15} 
M$while 2013Le22 adopted M1+E2, based on their level scheme (Fig. 1) this should be E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R=0.68 {I8} 
M$while 2013Le22 adopted M1+E2, based on their level scheme (Fig. 1) this should be E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R=0.29 {I5} 
M$while 2013Le22 adopted M1+E2, based on their level scheme (Fig. 1) this should be E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R=0.29 {I5} 
M$while 2013Le22 adopted M1+E2 (Table 1) they contradict both their |D|p=yes (Table 1) and their level scheme (Fig. 1); this should be E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$R=0.32 {I3} 
M$while 2013Le22 adopted M1+E2 (Table 1) they contradict both their |D|p=yes (Table 1) and their level scheme (Fig. 1); this should be E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$E2 |g from 2005Pe24 and 2006PeZZ; |g not given by the newer references 2013Le22 and 2013Va10 superseding them ({+96}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) dataset) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$E1 |g in 2005Pe24 and 2006PeZZ (no argument given) is missing in 2013Le22 and 2013Va10({+48}Ca,4n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g moved to 5312 level ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
M A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I4} (1987Gu22); A{-2}=-0.56 {I4} (1976Lu05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$|g placed at 4175 level in Adopted (from ({+48}Ca,4n|g)) 
M A{-2}=-0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I2} 
MR |d=-4 {I+1-}|@ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$contradictory arguments: M1+E2 in 2006PeZZ (based on DCO), while 12- to 11+ transition in 2005Pe24 (Fig. 1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.18 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} 
M$tentative E1 adopted by 1987Gu22 contradicts spins of initial and final levels in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset that indicates an M1(+E2) transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|g moved to 5312 level ({+48}Ca,4n|g) 
M A{-2}=-0.26 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.19 {I12} 
MR |d=-5.0 {I+43-}|@ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.29 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I11} 
M$M1+E2 in 2006Pe25 based on DCO is E1 in 2013Le22 ({+96}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$1452.9 {I2} in ({+24}Mg,|a3n|g); 1454.5 in (|a,3n|g) and (|a,5n|g) 
RI$from (|a,3n|g) 
M$D+Q in (|a,3n|g), (|a,5n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0036 {I10}. This value is much greater than calculated values for M1, E2 and E1, and E0 is not allowed by |DJ(levels); therefore no mult is adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
|r{+2}=17|*10{+-3} {I6} (1999Wo07) 
E from 1969Ar24 
M K/L=7.5 {I10} (1969Ar24), no |g observed (1970Ha29) 
RI I(ce(K))/I(641|g)=0.08 {I3} (1970Ha29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from limitation of relative statistical weight (LWM) analysis of measured values: {+143}Pm |e decay: E|g=741.98 {i4} (1971ScZU), 742.9 {i2} (1970Av03), 741.8 {i15} (1960Fu05); (|a,n|g): 742.1 {i3} (1983WrZY,1985ClZY), 742.1 {i1} (1990Wr01); (|a,3n|g): 741.8 {i2} (1977Ha04); (n,|g): 742.09 {i10} (1976Mi19); Others: {+143}Pr |b{+-} decay: 742 (1972Gr21); Coul. ex.: 741.2 (1984Dr03) 
RI from 1972Gr21. Others: |<1.5|*10{+-4}% (1963Gr10), <1|*10{+-3}% (1955Sa05); 1971Fi02 did not detect this transition 
M$from ce(K)=0.0035 {i4} in {+143}Pm |e decay (1970Av03). Other: 1968Be39 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1971ScZU. Others: 742.9 {i2} (1970Av03), 741.8 {i15} (1960Fu05) 
M |a(K)exp=0.0035 {i4} (1970Av03). Other: (1968Be39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$placement of 92|g and 379|g is interchanged in 1998Fa09 
M from adopted gammas. A{-2}=-0.31 {i3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {i5} (1990Az01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2}, Pol=-0.34 {I8} 
M A{-2}=-0.026 {i13}, A{-4}=+0.015 {i13} (1987Bu08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.13 {I8}, A{-4}=0.04 {I5}, Pol=-0.37 {I10} 
M$from |g(|q), linear pol (2000Zh03). 1998Fa09 assigned E1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.019 {I5} for 448 doublet (1998Fa09) 
$Placed in the level scheme but not in the table (2000Zh03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.23 {I8}, A{-4}=0.09 {I10}, Pol=+0.44 {I10} 
M$E1 from |g(|q), lin pol (2000Zh03) but 1998Fa09 assign M1+E2 on basis of |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.22 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I27}, Pol=+0.49 {I13} 
M$|g(|q), linear pol (2000Zh03). D from DCO in 1994Te05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
M A{-2}=+0.54 {i1}, A{-4}=+0.03 {i1}; ce was used for normalization of |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.10 {i4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {i7} (1977Ha04); A{-2}=-0.05 {i11}; |a(K)exp=93|*10{+-4} {i4} (1977BeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.31 {i2}, A{-2}=+0.18 {i2} (1977Ha04); A{-2}=-0.23 {i9}, |a(K)exp=3|*10{+-3} {i1} (1977BeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.18 {i2}, A{-4}=+0.21 {i3} (1977Ha04); A{-2}=-0.23 {i11}, |a(K)exp=7.9|*10{+-2} {i7} (1977BeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
RI$from 1996Ro13 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
RI$from 1996Ro13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2,E3)
decay_comment:
RI$from {+144}Pm |e decay 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Other ce values normalized assuming this is an E2 transition 
If Mult.=M3+E2, |d=-0.001 {I+3-4} (1999Ro18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0168 {I24}, inconsistent with |g|g(|q) value 
If Mult.=M2+E1, |d=-0.01 {I+3-4} (1999Ro18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(302|g):I|g(582|g):I(778|g)=22:30:100 (1976Be56), 11:11:100 (1976De11) 
|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp|?0.009; |g(|q): A{-2}=0.53 {I3} 
RI$I|g(1085|g)/I|g(658|g)=3/100 (1976Be56), 17/100 (1976De11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp|?0.045; |g(|q): A{-2}=-0.36 {I15} 
RI$I|g(416|g)/I|g(551|g)=100/44 (1976Be56), 100/15 (1976De11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.0052 (1976Ra21); K/L=8 {I3}, K/(L+M)=6 {I2} (1971Gr55) 1976Ra21 assumed I|g(864.0|g) to be 10% of total doublet intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M in (n,n'|g) 743|g is |DJ=0, D+Q and conflict with E2 in ({+13}C,4n|g). May be 743|g in (n,n'|g) is located elsewhere in the scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI Weighted average of I|g=31.3 {I5} (1992Ca11), I|g=29.9 {I8} (1974To04), and I|g=31.7 {I5} (1971Ge11). Other value: I|g=23 {I5} (1959Br65). 
M From |a(K)exp=3.3, K/L=1.1 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(M)exp(72)=0.12 {I3}, deduced by evaluators from K(72)/K(67)=2.3 {I2}, K(72)/M(72)=19 {I4} (1959Br65), and I|g(72)=100, I|g(67)=31.0 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from analysis of branching in (n,|g), (n,n'|g) and |b{+-} decay follow that part of I|g(1331.5|g) is located elsewhere in the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$analysis of branching in (n,n'|g), (n,|g) and |b{+-} decay suggests that part of the I|g=12 {I3} is located elsewhere in the decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$This |g was observed in {+145}Nd(n,|g) E=thermal only (see 1983Sn01) and wasn't found in {+146}Pr |b- decay but should be. Thus evaluators treat this transition as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I4}; 1/|d=-0.011 {I+21-5}, pol=1.8 {I5} (1984Ga31). Other: |d=+0.16 {I1}, second value |d=-16 {I+8-6} (1983Al12) Other: |d=4.6 {I+60-28} from |g|g(|q), {+146}Pm |b-decay (1978Ik03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1983Sn01; other: (1983Al12), the 1313.6|g depopulates the 3058.6 level, which was not seen by others. 
M$from A{-2}=+0.395 {I46}, A{-4}=+0.062 {I57}; (1983Al12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=-0.206 {I78}, A{-4}=+0.111 {I165}; |d=-0.85 {I+47-?} (J=2), |d=+0.01 {I+13-?} (J=3) (1983Al12); 2+,3+|)2+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Placement from 1983Sn01; other: the 1139.5|g depopulates the 3058.6 level, which was not seen by others. 
M$from A{-2}=+0.181 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I26}; (1983Al12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=-0.536 {I95}, A{-4}=-0.125 {I129}; |d=+0.6 {I+?-2}, 3+|)4+ transition or |d=-0.19 {I8}, 5+|)4+ transition (1983Al12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from |g|g coin. I|g(589.4|g+590.0|g)=35.0 {I2}, 590.0 keV |g from 1777.60 keV level (1983Sn01) 
M Q from |g|g(|q) (1983Sn01), syst exclude M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
RI$from |g|g coin. I|g(730.0|g+735.9|g+736.0|g)=20.0 {I1}, 730.0 keV and 736.0 keV |g' from 1919.10 keV and 1777.60 keV levels, correspondingly (1983Sn01) 
$|d=+0.05 {I+2-5} (1983Sn01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
$|d=-0.7 {I7} (1983Sn01) 
RI$from |g|g coin. I|g(589.4|g+590.0|g)=35.0 {I2}, 589.4 keV |g from 1043.16 keV level (1983Sn01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d=-22 {I19} (1983Sn01) 
$This |g was observed in {+145}Nd(n,|g), E=thermal only (see 1983Sn01) and wasn't found in {+146}Pr |b- decay but should be. Thus evaluators treat this transition as questionable. 
RI$from |g|g coin. I|g(730.0|g+735.9|g+736.0|g)=20.0 {I1}, 730.0 keV and 735.8 keV |g's from 1919.10 keV and 1189.58 keV levels, correspondingly (1983Sn01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$introduced by the evaluators from unplaced |g's in 1976Bu14 as the transition is observed in {+146}Pr |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from |g|g coin. I|g(730.0|g+735.9|g+736.0|g)=20.0 {I1}, 735.8 keV and 736.0 keV |g's from 1189.58 keV and 1777.60 keV levels, correspondingly (1983Sn01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|d=0.17 {I12} (1983Sn01) 
E$poor fit, energy level difference between corresponding levels equals 1524.46 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Populates J=2 state: A{-2}=+0.03 {I13}, at that A{-2}(theor)=0.05 for transition J=1|)J=2 (1977Be05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Populates J=2 state: A{-2}=+0.03 {I4}, at that A{-2}(theor)=0.05 for transition J=1|)J=2 (1977Be05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=-0.144 {I29}, A{-4}=+0.033 {I32} (1983Al12); pol=2.0 {I3} (1984Ga31) 
RI$I|g(1376)/I|g(923)=38/62 (1994YaZT), =34/66 (1995Di06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Second value |d=-0.25 {I4}; A {-2}=+0.050 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1983Al12); pol=0.58 {I14} (1984Ga31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I4}; 1/|d=-0.011 {I+21-5}, pol=1.8 {I5} (1984Ga31). Other: |d=+0.16 {I1}, second value |d=-16 {I+8-6} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.340 {I60}, A{-4}=+0.026 {I70}; the second value of |d=+0.9 {I3} (1983Al12); 4+|)4+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(789)/I|g(601)=69/31 (1994YaZT) agrees better with adopted values 
M$from A{-2}=-0.103 {I37}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I48} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.177 {I29}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I38}; the second value of |d=+2.8 {I4}. Other: |d=0.03 {I3}, 2+|)2+ transition (1978Ik03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$0.28 {I20} in table 1 of 1983Al12 is probably a misprint 
M$from A{-2}=+0.322 {I50}, A{-4}=-0.036 {I61} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=-0.807 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.010 {I35}, |DJ=1; |d=-0.65 {I-?+8} or |d=+1.0 {I-2+?} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=-0.074 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I15}; the second value of |d=+0.34 {I8} (J|p=1+) (1983Al12); 2+|)2+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=-0.442 {I68}, A{-4}=+0.164 {I94}; the second value of |d=+0.44 {I12}, |a=0.00220 {I7} (1983Al12); 3+|)4+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.175 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.004; |d=-0.35 {I5} (J=3) or -0.26 {I3} (J=4) (1983Al12); 3+,4+|)4+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$ from A{-2}=+0.374 {I48}, A{-4}=-0.006 {I59}; |d=0.40 {I+?-16}, the second value |d=0.95 {I+35-?} 2+|)2+ transition (1983Al12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.083 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I17}; the second value of |d=+4.4 {I+4-5} (1983Al12); 2+|)2+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(1902|g)/I|g(2356|g)=0.16 {I5} in |b{+-} decay, compared with 0.53 {I10} here. Perhaps part of 1902 should be placed elsewhere 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$1983Al12 places this |g from 3058.6 keV level which not seen by others 
M$from A{-2}=+0.395 {I46}, A{-4}=+0.062 {I57} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$missed in table 1, but E|g quoted in table 2 (1983Al12) 
M$from A{-2}=+0.458 {I62}, A{-4}=+0.213 {I92} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=+0.282 {I80}, A{-4}=+0.048 {I92}; the second value of |d=+0.14 {I+20-14} if 2+|)2+ transition (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$in 1983Al12, placement from 3058.6 keV level which not seen by others 
M$from A{-2}=+0.181 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I26} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2}=-0.507 {I356}, A{-4}=+0.144 {I336}; |d=-0.27 {I+33-?}, 3+|)2+ transition (1983Al12). 
M$from A{-2}=-0.507 {I356}, A{-4}=+0.144 {I336} (1983Al12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$15.1 {I12} (n,|g) 
M,MR$E2(+M1), |d{+2}>1.0 in {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay; M1 mixing excluded from |DJ=2, |D|p=no transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
Branching: I|g(315|g)/I|g(265|g)/I|g(187|g)/I|g(100|g)= 100/2.0 {I3}/4.0 {I6}/3.5 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/1.1 {I1}/6 {I1}/1.3 {I2} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$25 {I2} (n,|g) 
Branching: I|g(464|g)/I|g(414|g)/I|g(336|g)/I|g(249|g)=3.2 {I5}/22 {I3}/100/25 {I4} (1975Ro16), --/20 {I3}/100/27 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
Branching: I|g(389|g)/I|g(467|g)/I|g(517|g)/I|g(202|g)=100/91 {I13}/81 {I11}/27 {I4} (1975Ro16), 100/86 {I20}/53 {I15}/-- (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$42 {I3} (n,|g) 
Branching: I|g(641|g)/I|g(555|g)=100/42 {I6} (1975Ro16), 100/42 {I6} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$38 {I3} (n,|g) 
Branching: I|g(578|g)/I|g(478|g)/I|g(329|g)=100/17 {I6}/38 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/34 {I4}/32 {I5} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$44 {I3} (n,|g) 
Branching: I|g(627|g)/I|g(942|g)=44 {I5} (1975Ro16), 30 {I6} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(K)exp=2.5 {I3} 
MR 0.28 {I4} from L1/L2/L3=100 {I8}/30 {I6}/30 {I6}, and 0.26 {I7} from K/L=5.2 {I6} (1976Ro03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M from |a(L3)exp=0.78 {I8} based on I(ce(L3))=3.4 {I1} and from K/L1/L2/L3=100 {I3}/6.2 {I12}/35 {I1}/42 {I1} (1976Ro03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$137 {I10} (1993Sh33), 122 {I12} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(exp)=3.29 {I15}, |a(K)exp=2.4 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.29 {I6}, K/L=8.2 {I18} 
Branching: I|g(78|g)/I|g(128|g)=1.8 {I3} (1975Ro16), 1.0 {I1} (1977Re11, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$100 {I5} (1993Sh33), 100 {I10} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.71 {I21}, |a(L)exp=0.088 {I7}, K/L=7.0 {I5} 
E$127.923 {I2} (1979Bo26) 
Branching: I|g(78|g)/I|g(128|g)=1.8 {I3} (1975Ro16), 1.0 {I1} (1977Re11, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$74 {I5} (1993Sh33), 69 {I7} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(L)exp=1.66 {I13} 
Branching: I|g(87|g)/I|g(214|g)=6.7 {I3} (1975Ro16), 4.0 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$16.5 {I12} (1993Sh33), 19 {I2} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.118 {I14} 
M,MR$E2(+M1), |d>1.0 (1993Sh33); M1 mixture excluded from |DJ=2, |D|p=no transition 
Branching: I|g(87|g)/I|g(214|g)=6.7 {I3} (1975Ro16), 4.0 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$7.2 {I12} (1993Sh33), 5.5 {I5} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(315|g)/I|g(265|g)/I|g(187|g)/I|g(100|g)=100/2. 0 {I3}/4.0 {I6}/3.5 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/1.1 {I1}/6 {I1}/1.3 {I2} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$15.4 {I12} (1993Sh33), 11.7 {I12} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I3} 
Branching: I|g(315|g)/I|g(265|g)/I|g(187|g)/I|g(100|g)=100/2. 0 {I3}/4.0 {I6}/3.5 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/1.1 {I1}/6 {I1}/1.3 {I2} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$6.9 {I7} (1993Sh33), 4.0 {I4} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(315|g)/I|g(265|g)/I|g(187|g)/I|g(100|g)=100/2. 0 {I3}/4.0 {I6}/3.5 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/1.1 {I1}/6 {I1}/1.3 {I2} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$242 {I12} (1993Sh33), 255 {I25} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.041 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.0068 {I8}, K/L=6.0 {I5} 
E$314.657 {I39} (1979Bo26) 
Branching: I|g(315|g)/I|g(265|g)/I|g(187|g)/I|g(100|g)=100/2. 0 {I3}/4.0 {I6}/3.5 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/1.1 {I1}/6 {I1}/1.3 {I2} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$19.0 {I11} (1993Sh33), 15.3 {I15} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.087 {I12} 
Branching: I|g(464|g)/I|g(414|g)/I|g(336|g)/I|g(249|g)=3.2 {I5}/22 {I3}/100/25 {I4} (1975Ro16), --/20 {I3}/100/27 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
RI$62.8 {I32} (1993Sh33), 67 {I7} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.031 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.0060 {I18}, K/L=5.1 {I14} 
Branching: I|g(464|g)/I|g(414|g)/I|g(336|g)/I|g(249|g)=3.2 {I5}/22 {I3}/100/25 {I4} (1975Ro16), --/20 {I3}/100/27 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$13.6 {I12} (1993Sh33), 13.3 {I13} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(464|g)/I|g(414|g)/I|g(336|g)/I|g(249|g)=3.2 {I5}/22 {I3}/100/25 {I4} (1975Ro16), --/20 {I3}/100/27 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$|<0.2 {I12} (1993Sh33), 2.8 {I3} (2015Ru09) 
E,RI$In 1993Sh33 |g neither associated with a particular level, nor marked as "unplaced". The (tentative) placement adopted here was done based on the placement of 463.53 {I13} |g ray in (n,|g) dataset. 2015Ru09 positively measured and placed this |g ray, the intensity of which was adopted here 
Branching: I|g(464|g)/I|g(414|g)/I|g(336|g)/I|g(249|g)=3.2 {I5}/22 {I3}/100/25 {I4} (1975Ro16), --/20 {I3}/100/27 {I3} (av: {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$4.1 {I6} (1993Sh33), 1.6 {I2} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(389|g)/I|g(467|g)/I|g(517|g)/I|g(202|g)=100/91 {I13}/81 {I11}/27 {I4} (1975Ro16), 100/86 {I20}/53 {I15}/-- (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$19.5 {I14} (1993Sh33), 18 {I2} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.035 {I9} 
Branching: I|g(389|g)/I|g(467|g)/I|g(517|g)/I|g(202|g)=100/91 {I13}/81 {I11}/27 {I4} (1975Ro16), 100/86 {I20}/53 {I15}/ (no data) (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay, with 202|g undetected) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$25.8 {I15} (1993Sh33), 18 {I2} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(389|g)/I|g(467|g)/I|g(517|g)/I|g(202|g)=100/91 {I13}/81 {I11}/27 {I4} (1975Ro16), 100/86 {I20}/53 {I15}/-- (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$23.4 {I14} (1993Sh33), 15 {I1} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(389|g)/I|g(467|g)/I|g(517|g)/I|g(202|g)=100/91 {I13}/81 {I11}/27 {I4} (1975Ro16), 100/86 {I20}/53 {I15}/-- (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$18.3 {I11} (1993Sh33), 3.3 {I3} (2015Ru09). These values are discrepant. Value of 2015Ru09 that observed several low intensity |g's unobserved by 1993Sh33 was adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$80 {I4} (1993Sh33), 76 {I8} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0042 {I23} 
Branching: I|g(641|g)/I|g(555|g)=100/42 {I6} (1975Ro16), 100/42 {I6} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$216 {I11} (1993Sh33), 215 {I22} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0014 {I10} 
Branching: I|g(641|g)/I|g(555|g)=100/42 {I6} (1975Ro16), 100/42 {I6} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$53.7 {I32} (1993Sh33), 55 {I6} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp|<0.0066 
Branching: I|g(578|g)/I|g(478|g)/I|g(329|g)=100/17 {I6}/38 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/34 {I4}/32 {I5} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$62.9 {I31} (1993Sh33), 56 {I7} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp|<0.006 
Branching: I|g(578|g)/I|g(478|g)/I|g(329|g)=100/17 {I6}/38 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/34 {I4}/32 {I5} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$190 {I10} (1993Sh33), 187 {I19} (2015Ru09) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0027 {I10} 
Branching: I|g(578|g)/I|g(478|g)/I|g(329|g)=100/17 {I6}/38 {I5} (1975Ro16), 100/34 {I4}/32 {I5} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$4.3 {I4} (1993Sh33), 4.4 {I4} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(627|g)/I|g(942|g)=44 {I5} (1975Ro16), 30 {I6} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$14.5 {I9} (1993Sh33), 12.3 {I12} (2015Ru09) 
Branching: I|g(627|g)/I|g(942|g)=44 {I5} (1975Ro16), 30 {I6} (1975Do15, {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g ray placed by 1993Sh33 at 1264 level and reassigned at this 1351 level by 2015Ru09 
RI$19.1 {I11} (1993Sh33), 19 {I2} (2015Ru09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$mean value of 246.2 {I2} (n,n'|g) and 247.4 {I3} (|b{+-} decay (2.29 min)) 
RI$mean value of 6.0 {I6} (n,n'|g) and 4.5 {I6} (|b{+-} decay (2.01 min)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI from 1979Ik06; |g not observed by 1988Ka14. 1979Ik06 also place a 2130.37|g 20 depopulating this level. 1988Ka14; however, show a 2129.6|g 5 depopulating the 2431.7 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
I|g(3415)/I|g(3717)=0.5 {I4}, and |G{-|g0}=14 meV 4 assuming two separate levels at 3717 and 3415 with a branching to the first excited 2+ level; or I|g(3415)/I|g(3717)=1.5 {I3}, and |G{-|g0}=22 meV 6 assuming one level at 3717 with branching to the first excited 2+ level and a level at 3113 without such branching. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.004 if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)>306 exceeds RUL=300 if E2, suggesting transition is not pure E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$238.6|g is an unresolved doublet in |b{+-} decay, perhaps the intensity split is not correct in that dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Level-energy difference=284.96. Uncertainty doubled in the fitting procedure 
$B(M1)(W.u.)|>0.014 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)|>93 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=341.52. Uncertainty doubled in the fitting procedure 
$B(M1)(W.u.)|>0.039 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)|>187 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.043 {I+32-14} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.1|*10{+3} {I+8-4} exceeds RUL=300 if E2, suggesting transition is not pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=227.512. Uncertainty doubled in the fitting procedure 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.001 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>11 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
$|g from |g|g-coin in (n,|g) and {+149}Pr |b{+-}, but placement seems unlikely, since it requires M2 for 675.9|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$Measured I|g/100 decays=11.0 {I17} (1977Pi06 give 15% uncertainty for absolute intensities). Other: I|g(138.46|g)/100 decays=13 {I5} (1967Va14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$Placement proposed by 2010Ru09 based on possible |g|g-coin evidence. The |g was unplaced in 1977Pi06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 238.68 {I10} for the unresolved doublet in |b{+-} decay (1977Pi06) 
RI$combined intensity of the doublet=1.00 {I7} in |b{+-} decay 
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=238.623 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Poor fit. Level-energy difference=284.7. This |g was not used in the used in the least-squares fitting procedure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2010Ru09. This |g was reported in 1977Pi06 with E|g=341.26 {I13}, I|g=0.90 {I8} (1977Pi06), but was unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement proposed by 2010Ru09 based on possible |g|g-coin evidence, considered as uncertain by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 409.70 {I9} for the unresolved doublet in |b{+-} decay (1977Pi06) 
RI$combined intensity of the doublet=1.1 {I1} in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 238.68 {I10} for the unresolved doublet in |b{+-} decay (1977Pi06) 
RI$combined intensity of the doublet=1.00 {I7} in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2010Ru09. This |g was reported in 1977Pi06 with E|g=494.62 {I12}, I|g=0.74 {I5} (1977Pi06), but was unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2010Ru09. This |g was reported in 1977Pi06 with E|g=724.30 {I30}, I|g=0.80 {I11} (1977Pi06), but was unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement proposed by 2010Ru09. E|g=874.8 in 2010Ru09. Placement considered uncertain by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+151}Pr |b{+-}. In (n,|g), E|g=143.806~{I18} may be placed here, but its intensity in (n,|g) is too large to be assigned with this level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$From {+151}Pr |b{+-} and (d,p|g). It is possible that this |g ray deexcites a level different from the one in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A 523.5|g from {+151}Pr |b{+-} decay shown to deexcite a 599 level only, may also populate 581 level, as suggested by a comparison of branching ratios from 599 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(exp)|>28 (from |g|g coin) (1994Sh37) gives M1,E2. Intensity balance at 22.5 level, possible |b{+-} feeding|<6.6% and unplaced intensity of 41 units, all combined give |a=50~{I13} and |d(E2/M1)=0.16~{I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$for M1 
$|a(exp)|>6.1 (from |g|g coin) gives M1,E2. |g-ray intensity balance and allowance for I|b(76 level)<6.6% is consistent with M1 or M1 with some E2 admixture, but not pure E2 (|a=23.4) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=17.6~{I16}. This |g is shown to deexcite a 599 level only by 1994Sh37. The (n,|g) results and comparison of branching ratios from 599 level indicate placement with 581 level also 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0055~{I4} (2003Ko13) 
RI$other: 12~{I2} (1978PiZQ) 
M$absence of ce data for this transition may indicate E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Reported only by 1988Ka14 and unplaced by the authors. This May be the same |g as the 8+ to 6+ 322.1~{I5} transition reported in {+252}Cf SF decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
MR$|d=+0.8 {I7} from |g|g(|q) (with |d(285|g)=0.0) 
RI$The reported values are discrepant. 3.3~{I4} (1999To04), 5.1~{I4} (1992He13) and 8.8~{I13} (1988Ka14). From an intensity balance at the 1251 level, I|g<5.7, so the value of 1988Ka14 is too large. The evaluator adopts a weighted average of the other two values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.014~{I3} (1998To23). This is in conflict with |a(K)exp=0.040~{I15} from X|g/|g|g (1992He13). |a(K)(theory)=0.013 (E1), 0.048 (E2) 
MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.1~{I5} given |d(1470|g)=0.2 (1992He13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp<0.030 (1998To23) 
MR$1999To04 give |d(Q/D)=-0.12~{I11}. 1992He13 report |d=-0.2~{I2} (note the misprint in the authors' TABLE II, where J(236 level) is shown as 2. The correct J of 4 is given in the authors' decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Value of 75.9~{I5} reported by 1971Ch44 is discrepant. E|g=72.40~{I5} is reported in |b{+-} decay 
M$From K/L|?1.5 (1974KhZV - read by the evaluator from authors' fig. 5). Theory values are 6.7 (E1), 0.83 (E2), and 7.1 (M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay. Others: 70.8 {I1} from {+252}Cf,{+248}Cm SF decay and 70.8 {I3} from (n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay. Others: 162.4 {I1} from {+252}Cf,{+248}Cm SF decay and 162.4 {I3} from (n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 932.3 {I4} from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay and 932.0 {I3} from (n,F|g). Other: 931.8 ({+252}Cf,{+248}Cm SF decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 794.3 {I4} from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay and 794.5 {I3} from (n,F|g) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I7} from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay and 100 {I23} from (n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 956.9 {I3} from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay and 956.9 {I3} from (n,F|g) 
RI$weighted average of 91 {I30} from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay and 92 {I31} from (n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 895.1 {I4} from {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay and 895.0 {I3} from (n,F|g) 
RI$from (n,F|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E From 1988Ka16, {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay; values from SF: 70.7 (1994Sm07), 72.8 (1995Zh39), and 71.1 (1998Zh12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E From 1988Ka16, {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay; values from SF: 162.4 (1994Sm07), 162.1 (1995Zh39), and 162.8 (1998Zh12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed experimentally. Value deduced from the energy difference between the (11/2-) and (5/2+) levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R(DCO)=1.7 {I2}. This value does not suggest the transition placement (1996Ga17) between levels with 25/2- and 23/2-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R(DCO)=1.9 {I2}. This value does not suggest the transition placement (1996Ga17) between levels with 29/2- and 27/2-. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$E1 with |a=1.3 is ruled out from intensity balance argument at 55.4+x level. M2 and higher multipolarities requiring a longer (|ms or higher) lifetime for the 55.4+x level are less likely since 55.4|g is seen in |g|g coincidences (1989Vi04) Thus choice of (M1,E2) seems most probable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$the quoted energy seems to be low by |?3.5 keV. Corresponding energy in {+116}Sn({+24}Mg,p4n|g) is 938.4 {I3} (1987Be22). Inspection of figure 1 in 1987Be22 and level energy difference suggest 937 
R(DCO)=0.83 {I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$M2, and higher multipolarities are excluded based on comparison to RUL. Systematics of odd-odd N=77 nuclei exhibit J|p=8+ isomers decaying by E1 transitions. Similarly in the N=73 odd-odd nucleus {+134}Pm, the long-lived |ms isomer decays by an E1 transition (2008Ri05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 0.9 {I1} for 192.6 {I2} transition placed as soley depopulating the 307+x level (1988Ke03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$delayed intensity=3.0% {I3} of the total delayed |g|g projection spectrum 
E$from 2008Ri05 
M$M2, M3, and E3 character are excluded based on comparison to RUL. Systematics of odd-odd N=77 nuclei finds J|p=8+ isomers decaying by E1 transitions. Similarly, in the N=73 odd-odd nucleus {+134}Pm, the long-lived |ms isomer decays by an E1 transition (2008Ri05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$|DJ=0 transition 
$Compiler's note: RUL does not allow significant M2 admixture for 835.0 transition. DCO value for |DJ=0, dipole (E1) transition should be |?1.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$Compiler's note: RUL does not allow significant M2 admixture for 1110.9 transition. Transition should be mainly dipole (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$|DJ=0 transition 
$Compiler's note: RUL does not allow significant M2 admixture for 454.4 transition. Transition should be mainly dipole (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 410.6 {I1} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) and 411.3 {I2} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 468.2 {I1} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) and 468.5 {I2} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$observed in {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g) (1990Be28) only 
RI$I|g(178.3|g)/I(352.2|g)=(100 {I5})/(68 {I5}) (1990Be28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 92 {I5} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g), and 81 {I4} from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g). Other: 65 {I5} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$doubly placed in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) (1998Pr04); placed differently in {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g) (1990Be28) and {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) (2015Li15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 67 {I7} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g), and 87 {I11} from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g). Other: <77 from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 391.6 {I1} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) and 392.4 {I2} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g). 
RI$Others: 100 {I8} in {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g), 26 {I3} in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$also placed from a level at E=6864+x with J|p=(21+) in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g). 
RI$weighted average of 92 {I8} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g), and 84 {I6} from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g). Other: <100 from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 610.6 {I1} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) and 610.9 {I2} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 937.6 {I1} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) and 938.6 {I2} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$energy value is from 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g), placement is from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) by 2015Li15. 1998Pr04 placed this |g ray from a level at E=2532+x, which is not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$energy value is from 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g), placement is from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) by 2015Li15. 1998Pr04 placed this |g ray from a level at E=3702+x, which is not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 486 {I1} from {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) and 484 {I1} from {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$energy value is from 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g), placement is from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) by 2015Li15. 1998Pr04 placed this |g ray from a level at E=4579+x, which is not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$from {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) (2015Li15), but Mult=D from DCO ratio in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) (1998Pr04) is inconsistent 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g ray placed here by in (HI,xn|g) (1993De40) but at 1301+x in ({+19}F,5n|g) (2010Wa37), which was adopted by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$relatively pure stretched D, |D|p=yes E1 based on proposed configuration in ({+19}F,5n|g) (2010Wa37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.090 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.013 {I2} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.08 {I2} (1987De04), |a(K)exp=0.098 {I29}, K/L=7.6 {I15} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.12 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.018 {I3} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.13 {I2} (1987De04), |a(K)exp=0.14 {I3}, K/L=8.8 {I13} (1973VaYZ) 
RI I|g=15% {I3} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI from 1987De04. |a: from intensity feeding the 260 level one deduces |a>66. |a=154.5 (E2), 4.957 (M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.88 {I22}, |a(L)exp=0.13 {I3} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.81 {I24}, K/L=7.2 {I20} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.030 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.0059 {I17} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.027 {I5} (1987De04), |a(K)exp=0.028 {I4} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.54 {I20} |a(L)exp=0.075 {I29} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.45 {I15} (1987De04), |a(K)exp=0.55 {I16}, K/L=8.6 {I30} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.52 {I19}, |a(L)exp=0.056 {I21} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.32 {I8} (1973VaYZ) 
RI 0.9 {I3} in 1987De04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.15 {I4}, |a(L)exp=0.030 {I8} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.16 {I4} (1987De04), |a(K)exp=0.15 {I3}, K/L=5.7 {I10} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.32 {I11} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.28 {I10} (1987De04), |a(K)exp=0.36 {I9}, K/L=6.4 {I16} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.075 {I21}, |a(L)exp=0.011 {I4} (1981PoZV), |a(K)exp=0.069 {I10}, K/L=8.7 {I35} (1973VaYZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.42 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} (1993De40) 
M$1993De40 argument: pure D, |DJ=0 based on |g(|q) and DCO; E1 from comparison with N=79 isotone {+142}Eu (1990Bi07,2000Tu01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=0.00 {I5}, A{-4}=0.05 {I8} (1993De40) 
M$1993De40 argument: D, |DJ=1 based on DCO; E1 from comparison with N=79 isotone {+142}Eu (1990Bi07,2000Tu01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3}, P=-0.71 {10} (1981PoZV,1982PoZX) 
M$|DJ=0 E1 (M1+E2 with |d=-0.45 {10} is also listed by 1981PoZV and 1982PoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4}, P=+0.46 {I15} (1981PoZV,1982PoZX) 
M$in 2010Wa37 while this is a dipole with parity changing transition, so E1, in Table 2 (level scheme assigned data) the noted multipolarity is M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$while this is a dipole with no parity changing transition, so M1(+E2), in Table 2 (level scheme assigned data) the noted multipolarity is E1 (2010Wa37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$for the resolved doublet 755.4|g+755.4|g in 2010Wa37, 1982PoZX and 1981PoZV found A{-2}=-0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I1}, P=-0.39 {I23} as for a singlet. (M1+E2) adopted by 2010Wa37 for this stronger component seems sustained by 1982PoZX and 1981PoZV |g(|q) and linear pol data (for the weaker component 2010Wa37 adopted E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I4}, P=+0.20 {I3} (1981PoZV,1982PoZX) 
M$M1+E2 adopted by 1982PoZX and 2010Wa37 (1982PoZX did not exclude E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g ray assigned at 1573 in ({+3}He,3n|g) and (|a,4n|g) but to 2641 in ({+19}F,4n|g) and ({+12}C,4n|g), which was adopted, by reversing the order of 1068|g+260|g cascade in between 2641 and 1313 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$according to 2011Gu12 in ({+19}F,4n|g) their 170|g connects 2810 and 2662 levels, in which case it should be 148.1|g; however 2004Bh01 in ({+12}C,4n|g) found that there is indeed a 170|g depopulating 2810 but to 2640 that is missing in ({+19}F,4n|g), which was adopted by evaluator (both datasets contain a slightly higher 2641 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.214 {i15} normalized to |a(K)=0.0914 for 661|g M4 in {+137}Cs; |d|?+0.1 from (432|g)(196|g)(|q) a{-2}=-0.056 {i40}, a{-4}=-0.040 {i56} (1970ArZQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0024 {i9} (1977Ke03), (777|g)(196|g)(|q): a{-2}=-0.09 {i4}, a{-4}=-0.07 {i9} (1970ArZQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0030 {i10}; |d from (p,2n|g) (1980Pi03). Other: |d=0.0 {i5} (from |a(K)exp) 
M |a(K)exp=0.0030 {i10}, |d from (p,2n|g) (1980Pi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$2011Gu12 quote E2 from 2004Bh01 (({+12}C,4n|g) dataset), which finally assigned M1+E2; 1989Gu10 adopt M1+E2 too 
M A{-2}=-0.86 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$observed by 1989Gu10 but not by 2011Gu12 
RI$62 {I10} (1989Gu10) 
M A{-2}=-0.52 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$observed by 1989Gu10 but not by 2011Gu12 
RI$105 {I13} (1989Gu10) 
M A{-2}=+0.53 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$measured by 1989Gu10 but inexistent in 2011Gu12; 2004Bh01 (({+12}C,4n|g)) placed this transition at a close lying but different level, 2639.7, populated by 170|g from 2810 
RI$60 {I20} (1989Gu10) 
M A{-2}=-0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$according to 2011Gu12 the 170.3|g connects the 2810.7 and 2661.8 levels, in which case it should be 148.1|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$possibly same |g ray as 871.22 {I14} (|DI|g=129 {I16}) placed at 2382 in 1989Gu10 
M A{-2}=+0.06 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$taken from authors' earlier work in {+133}Cs({+13}C,5n|g) in 2000Bh08; not seen in the present work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E,RI doublet with |DE=0.15 keV (1975KeZN) and I|g=385 
M ce(K)<59 {I10}, |a(K)exp=0.15 {I3}, A{-2}=-0.03 {I1}; K/LM=5.83 {I16} (1972Ra42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI doublet with |DE=0.15 keV (1975KeZN) and I|g=385 
M ce(K)<59.5, |a(K)exp=0.15 {I3}; K/LM=2.94 {I8} (1972Ra42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R(ang)=0.84 {I10} 
$Positive parity of final level, as reported in table I of 2004Li49, seems to be a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$The 44.0-keV transition is a doublet (|g and K{-|b}) as it is much stronger than the 38 keV K{-|a} of Pm (from 2004Li31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.02 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1} 
M |a(K)exp=0.0941 {I28} (normalized to |a(K)(E2) for |g rays from 2+ to 0+ in {+166}Er,{+172}Hf,{+178}Hf) (1980OhZU) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7}; p=-0.06 {I6}; 1980Pr02 proposed mult M1+(E2) with |d=-0.57 {I54} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+(M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I6} (A{-2}=-0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1}), |a(K)=0.00179 (E2), |a(K)=0.00280 (M1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.24 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4}; mult is compatible with adopted decay scheme (J|p and Branching) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E1 from |a(K)exp=0.011 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.21 {I3}, A{-4}|?0. E1 is in conflict with adopted J|p 
Placement from adopted levels. Placement from 1898.4 level was suggested earlier 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M A{-2}=+0.12 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2}; not compatible with |g(|q) and linear polarization data from (|a,2n|g)(1980Pr02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2000He20, same as in decay. Transition could be the same as 134.2 {I2} placed from 5827.4 level in 2000Bh08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
$Not observed by 1975Ma04 nor 1993Gl03. E,I|g; from 1996Zh26 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average between 1975Ma04 and 1993Gl03 values; I|g from 1996Zh26 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC E3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M3)
decay_comment:
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Seen only by 1993Gl03 E; from level-energy difference. |g not observed since below the energy detection threshold 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
$Seen only by 1993Gl03 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from 1993Mu03, since the published value is 699 keV, which does not agree with a level energy of 841 keV, and is most likely a typing error 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this transition is hinted in the Radford-style plot in which the data are presented. The energy is calculated from level differences since the transition energy is not given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition is not seen but is required to account for the delayed component in 750.4|g. E|g is from E(level) difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$Measured E(ce(K))(2000KoZU) 
RI I|g=12.15% {I10} (1991Pl01). Other: 12.2% {I2} (1991ChZZ) 
M |a(K)exp=5.3 {I1}, K/L=6.5 {I4}, L/M=5.1 {I3} (1959Br65); K/L=8.1 {I8}, L/M=4.0 {I8} (1959Dz06); L1/L2=11.1 {I12}, L1/L3=39 {I6}, L2/L3=3.5 {I6} (1967Ba22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)=0.00376 used for normalization of other |a(K)exp, K/L=6.2 {I12}; A{-2}=+0.134 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.022 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$stretched E2 on the basis of feeding and decay of the 872.9 keV level and appropriate conversion coefficients (1995Rz02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$based on |a(K)exp in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 
MR$from |g(|q,H,t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 
$91|g probability for emission of two K-electrons in internal conversion (relative to one K-electron emission): 1.86|*10{+-3} {I9} (2003Vi13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 408.20 {I7} (p,2n|g) and 408.34 {I18} (|b{+-}) 
M,MR$based on |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$based on |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in |b{+-} decay and (p,2n|g) 
MR$ {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay (1977Kr13). Other: -0.34 {I7} (1977Ko24) in (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 398.130 {I16} (|b{+-}) and 398.24 {I5} (p,2n|g) 
M,MR$based on |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g). Other: +0.30 {I4} in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay and (p,2n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q,H,t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay. Value is consistent with ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$based on |a(K)exp in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 
MR$from |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 230.59 {I5} in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay and 230.77 {I8} in (p,2n|g) 
M$based on |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 272.30 {I4} (|b{+-}) and 272.2 {I2} (p,2n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay. Other: 679.9 {I3} in (p,2n|g) 
M$based on |a(K)exp in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay 
MR$from |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay. Other: -0.21 {I3} in (p,2n|g), note opposite sign 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in {+147}Nd |b{+-} 
MR$from |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay (1977Al34) 
$Uncertainty in B(E2)(W.u.) is mainly from 40% uncertainty in level half-life. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp marginally overlaps M1 or E2 when compared to theoretical |a(K)(E2)=0.18 and |a(K)(M1)=0.22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)>0.7 from |a(K)exp 
$|g placement based on branching: I|g(589|g)/I|g(680|g)=2.3 {I5} in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay as compared to 1.8 {I4} in 1977Ko24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$M1 in Adopted Gammas based on data from 1995Ur01 in ({+136}Xe({+15}N,4n|g), where authors assumed that the 247.0|g reported in (p,2n|g) was contributed by a 247|g, mult=E1 transition in {+148}Nd populated in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1995Ur01 give E1 from |a(K)exp, but M1 or M1+E2 is expected from their J|p assignments of the two levels connected by this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1967Hi04, crystal diffraction spectrometer. 
$Other precise E|g=91.05 {I4} (1960Wa11, crystal), 91.06 {I5} (1961Ew02), 91.106 {I20} (1974HeYW), 91.06 {I3} (1979Se05), 91.109 {I4} (1979Vo09), 91.219 {I45} (1980Ch38), 91.10 {I3} (1983Li19), 91.004 {I2} (1997Sa53, uncertainty seems underestimated). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1957Ew38 (crystal), 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 218.9 {I27} (2020Ke08); 210 {I4} (1997Sa53, uncertainty of 2% is underestimated as the efficiency curve in this energy region is not well established, and this peak is situated on a high Compton continuum); 218 {I2} (1995Go44, uncertainty of 1% is underestimated for the same reason as explained for 1997Sa53); 240 {I12} (1983Li19); 215 {I12} (1980Ch38); 230 {I25} (1979Se05); 239 {I5} (1979Vo09); 213 (1974HeYW); 220 {I14} (1974Ra30); 187 (1971Si20); 227 {I35} (1967Hi04); 248 {I13} (1967Do07); 211 {I42} (1967Ca18); 213 {I14} (1967Ba21); 300 {I100} (1967Ja05); 275 {I50} (1966Ar16). Minimum uncertainty of 5% is assumed by evaluator in values measured earlier than the 2020Ke08 value in the averaging procedure, as the efficiency response curve for the Ge detectors is not known well in this energy region. Other: 390 {I20} (1967Ki08, is discrepant, not used in averaging). 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=28.70 {I35} (2020Ke08); 29.02 {I40} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=212 (2010-Ghumman) 
$Ice(K)=27315 {I518}, Ice(L)=3916 {I101} (1997Sa53); Ice(L1+L2)=3920 {I275}, Ice(L3)=119 {I18}, Ice(M)=930 {I93}, Ice(N)=235 {I35} (1967Ba21) 
$91|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=+0.023 {I2}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=+0.004 {I2} (1977Al34). 
$91|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}=+0.202 {I14} (1969Ba32) 
$(L1+L2):L3:M:N=330 {I55}:10:78 {I14}:20 {I4} (1967Ba21) 
$Probability for emission of two K-electrons in internal conversion of 91-keV |g (relative to one K-electron emission): 1.86|*10{+-3} {I9} (2003Vi13) 
M$from |a(K)exp=1.63 {I4}, with penetration parameter=3.2 {I9} (2003Zh47); |a(K)exp=1.737 from Ice(K)=173.7 (1961Ew02) 
MR$from |g(|q,H,t) (1969Ba32, earlier value from this experimental group was +0.13 {I2} reported in 1961We07). Others: 0.092 {I5} (1965Ew03, L1/L3, L1/L2 and K/L; previous value was 0.089 {I11} in 1961Ew02); +0.10 {I9} (1957Bi86, |g(|q,H,t)); 0.082 {I10} (1967Ba21, ce data). Evaluator prefers to adopt value from |g(|q,H,t) method, as the values deduced from internal conversion data may be dependent on penetration parameters. 1977Kr13 evaluation gives +0.099 {I10}, based on data taken from 1969Ba32, 1961We07, 1961Ew02 and 1957Bi86. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 408.16 {I5} (1979Se05), 408.14 {I5} (1983Li19). Other: 408.52 {I6} (1997Sa53) 
RI$from 2020Ke08. Others: 0.14 {I1} (1997Sa53); 0.15 {I1} (1983Li19); 0.115 {I16} (1979Se05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.01368 {I46} (2020Ke08) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 319.39 {I8} (1961Ew02), 319.41 {I3} (1967Hi04, crystal), 319.411 {I18} (1974HeYW), 319.39 {I2} (1979Se05), 319.413 {I12} (1979Vo09), 319.447 {I40} (1980Ch38), 319.43 {I4} (1983Li19). Other: 319.542 {I3} (1997Sa53, uncertainty seems underestimated; also a discrepant value). Others less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 14.94 {I12} (2020Ke08); 15 {I2} (1999Po32); 15.91 {I11} (1997Sa53); 14.8 {I2} (1995Go44); 14.8 {I4} (1983Li19); 15.35 {I48} (1980Ch38); 13.8 {I11} (1979Se05); 15.0 {I3} (1979Vo09); 14.9 {I9} (1974HeYW); 16.5 {I10} (1974Ra30); 14.2 {I13} (1971Si20); 16.3 {I24} (1967Hi04); 15 {I5} (1967Ja05); 15.8 {I10} (1967Do07); 14.2 {I14} (1967Ca18); 14.5 {I11} (1967Ba21); 15.0 {I15} (1966Ar16). Minimum uncertainty of 3% is assumed in values measured prior to that of 2020Ke08. Other: 17.0 {I9} (1967Ki08) seems discrepant 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=1.959 {I16} (2020Ke08); 1.917 {I13} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=16.970 {I25} (2010-Ghumman) 
$319|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.062 {I5}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=+0.003 {I6} (1977Al34) 
$(319|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.092 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I14} (1977Al34) 
$319|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}=-0.12 {I2} (1969Ba32) 
$(319|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.080 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.0013 {I60} (1979Vo09) 
$(319|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.088 {I8}, G{-4}A{-4}=-0.016 {I14} (1976Si08, NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$(319|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.085 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I15} (1970Bl12, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$Ice(K)=62.2 {I18}, Ice(L)=9.5 {I4} (1997Sa53) 
$Ice(K)=53.0 {I15}, Ice(L)=7.5 {I8} (1979Vo09) 
M$from |a(K)exp data 
MR$weighted average of -0.391 {I16} (1979Se05, |g|g(|q)); -0.41 {I3} (1977Al34, |g|g(|q), authors' other value is -0.32 to -1.7 from |g(|q,H,t)); and the following values evaluated by 1977Kr13: -0.38 {I2} (1976Si08, |g|g(|q)); -0.37 {I3} (1970Bl12, |g|g(|q)); -0.31 {I9} (1969Ba32, |g(|q,H,t), authors' value was +0.55 {I5}); -0.34 {I2} (1966Go25); -0.39 {I4} (1963Sp07); -0.36 {I2} (1961We07); -0.42 {I8} (1961Ar09); -0.38 {I2} (1960Bo17); -0.40 {I2} (1957Li40). Others: -0.27 {I1} (1960Ma03), |?0.5 (1961Ew02, L-subshell ratios). 1977Kr13 evaluation gives -0.37 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 410.48 {I3} (1974HeYW), 410.51 {I3} (1979Se05), 410.59 {I7} (1979Vo09), 410.48 {I5} (1983Li19), 410.58 {I3} (1997Sa53). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Hi04, 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30. E|g=410.331 {I57} in 1980Ch38 seems discrepant. 
RI$weighted average of 0.812 {I11} (2020Ke08); 0.78 {I4} (1995Go44); 0.73 {I5} (1983Li19); 0.95 {I5} (1980Ch38); 0.79 {I6} (1979Se05); 0.93 {I5} (1979Vo09); 1.03 {I28} (1971Si20); 1.2 {I5} (1967Hi04); 1.0 {I6} (1967Ja05); 0.9 {I2} (1967Do07). Others: 1.12 {I1} (1997Sa53), 1.2 {I3} (1974Ra30); 1.07 {I6} (1974HeYW); 1.30 {I13} (1967Ca18); 1.7 {I2} (1967Ba21); 1.3 {I1} (1966Ar16) seem too high and discrepant. 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.1065 {I14} (2020Ke08) 
$I|g=1.674 {I4} (2010-Ghumman) 
M$410|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.001 {I58}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=-0.068 {I62}, consistent with pure E2 (1977Al34). The |a(K)exp from 1997Sa53 is consistent with E2, but that from 1979Vo09 gives |d(E2/M1)<1.3 
$Ice(K)=1.44 {I9} (1997Sa53), 2.0 {I5} (1979Vo09), 1.8 {I13} (1967Ba21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 81.15 {I7} (1979Se05), 80.82 {I27} (1997Sa53) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.0068 {I9} (1997Sa53), 0.0041 {I25} (1979Se05). This |g is not reported by 2020Ke08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average: 398.22 {I7} (1967Hi04, crystal), 398.155 {I20} (1974HeYW), 398.13 {I3} (1979Se05), 398.098 {I16} (1979Vo09), 398.170 {I30} (1980Ch38), 398.14 {I5} (1983Li19). Other: E|g=398.336 {I2} (1997Sa53, uncertainty seems underestimated, and is discrepant in energy). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 6.598 {I76} (2020Ke08); 6.82 {I6} (1997Sa53); 6.64 {I7} (1995Go44); 6.52 {I15} (1983Li19), 6.72 {I22} (1980Ch38), 6.5 {I5} (1979Se05); 6.59 {I10} (1979Vo09); 6.7 {I4} (1974HeYW); 6.5 {I7} (1974Ra30); 6.3 {I5} (1971Si20); 6.6 {I3} (1967Ki08); 6.8 {I11} (1967Hi04); 6.7 {I5} (1967Do07); 6.4 {I6} (1967Ca18); 6.6 {I6} (1967Ba21); 7.0 {I7} (1966Ar16). Other: 5 {I2} (1967Ja05). Minimum uncertainty of 3% is assumed in values measured prior to that of 2020Ke08. 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.865 {I10} (2020Ke08); 0.840 {I9} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=7.797 {I15} (2010-Ghumman) 
$398|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.052 {I9}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=+0.009 {I10} (1977Al34) 
$397|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}<0 (1969Ba32) 
$(398|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.063 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.015 {I15} (1979Vo09) 
$(398|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.092 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I14} (1977Al34) 
$(398|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.074 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I23} (1970Bl12, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$Ice(K)=15.0 {I5} (1997Sa53), 16.6 {I10} (1979Vo09), 14.7 {I15} (1967Ba21) 
$Other |a(K)exp: 0.033 {I3} (1979Vo09), 0.030 {I6} (1967Ba21) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$from |g(|q) data in (p,2n|g) (1977Ko24). Value from |b{+-} is +0.30 {I4} from weighted average of +0.31 {I5} from |g|g(|q) and +0.29 {I4} from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34). Others: +0.18 {I6} (1974Bh02), +0.14 {I6} (1970Bl12), +0.50 {I7} (1966Go25), +0.31 {I3} (1960Bo17), as evaluated by 1977Kr13 from respective |g|g(|q) data, and based on these data, 1977Kr13 give +0.24 {I5}. The |a(K)exp values are consistent with |d(E2/M1)=0.30 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 489.240 {I28} (1974HeYW), 489.30 {I8} (1979Se05), 489.25 {I3} (1979Vo09), 489.296 {I50} (1980Ch38), 489.25 {I5} (1983Li19), 489.35 {I4} (1997Sa53, authors' uncertainty of 0.01 keV increased by evaluator). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Hi04, 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 1.072 {I33} (2020Ke08); 1.16 {I1} (1997Sa53); 1.07 {I24} (1995Go44); 1.04 {I5} (1983Li19), 1.06 {I5} (1980Ch38), 1.07 {I8} (1979Se05); 1.12 {I6} (1979Vo09); 1.17 {I6} (1974HeYW); 1.4 {I4} (1974Ra30); 1.12 {I19} (1971Si20); 0.8 {I3} (1967Ki08); 1.1 {I5} (1967Hi04); 1.0 {I5} (1967Ja05); 1.2 {I3} (1967Do07); 1.5 {I8} (1967Ca18); 1.5 {I2} (1967Ba21). Other: 0.70 {I8} (1966Ar16) seems discrepant. Minimum uncertainty of 3% is assumed in values in averaging procedure 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.1406 {I43} (2020Ke08); 0.138 {I4} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=1.123 {I15} (2010-Ghumman) 
$489|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=+0.048 {I34}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=-0.026 {I37} (1977Al34) 
$Ice(K)=1.57 {I9} (1997Sa53), 2.0 {I5} (1979Vo09) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34). Other values of |d=>+4 and <-6 from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34) are inconsistent with conversion data, which suggest dominant M1. |d=+1.2 {I+28-8} from 1977Kr13 evaluation, based on |g|g(|q) data of 1961Sa13 is not in good agreement with either the value |g(|q,H,t) or from ce data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 120.47 {I5} (1961Ew02), 120.490 {I9} (1967Hi04, crystal), 120.48 {I5} (1974HeYW), 120.46 {I2} (1979Se05), 120.453 {I15} (1979Vo09), 120.578 {I40} (1980Ch38), 120.51 {I3} (1983Li19), 120.488 {I20} (1997Sa53, authors' uncertainty of 0.005 increased by evaluator). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$unweighted average of 2.782 {I31} (2020Ke08); 2.81 {I4} (1997Sa53); 2.81 {I14} (1983Li19), 2.96 {I16} (1980Ch38), 2.71 {I25} (1979Se05); 3.05 {I10} (1979Vo09); 3.03 {I32} (1974HeYW); 3.3 {I5} (1974Ra30); 2.65 {I34} (1971Si20); 3.3 {I5} (1967Hi04); 2.5 {I5} (1967Ca18); 3.0 {I2} (1967Ba21); 2.6 {I4} (1966Ar16). Others: 3.57 {I11} (1995Go44); 8 {I1} (1967Ja05), 4.72 {I24} (1967Ki08), 2.1 {I2} (1967Do07) seem discrepant. Minimum uncertainty of 3% is assumed in values prior to that of 2020Ke08 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.3647 {I41} (2020Ke08); 0.378 {I5} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=3.263 {I6} (2010-Ghumman) 
$120|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=+0.070 {I25}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=-0.017 {I26} (1977Al34) 
$(120|g)[319|g](91|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.004 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I52} (1977Al34) 
$(120|g)(410|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.009 {I78}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I12} (1977Al34) 
$(120|g)(319|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.020 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I21} (1977Al34) 
$(121|g)(319|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.041 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I10} (1970Bl12, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$Ice(K)=166 {I5}, Ice(L)=24 {I1} (1997Sa53), Ice(K)=166 {I17}, Ice(L)=27 {I6} (1967Ba21) 
$Other |a(K)exp: 0.75 {I12} (1967Ba21) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$weighted average of 0.050 {I21} from |g|g(|q) and +0.037 {I56} from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34). This value is consistent with ce data. Others: +0.04 {I3} (1977Kr13 evaluation, based on |g|g(|q) data of 1970Bl12, 1966Go25, 1961Sa13 and 1960Bo17); |?0.14 (1961Ew02, L-subshell ratios) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 439.82 {I10} (1961Ew02), 439.85 {I8} (1967Hi04, crystal), 439.895 {I22} (1974HeYW), 439.92 {I5} (1979Se05), 439.856 {I17} (1979Vo09), 439.921 {I60} (1980Ch38), 439.88 {I4} (1983Li19). Other: E|g=440.062 {I2} (1997Sa53, uncertainty seems underestimated, and discrepant in energy, not used in averaging). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 9.115 {I76} (2020Ke08); 9.54 {I7} (1997Sa53); 9.15 {I17} (1995Go44); 8.97 {I23} (1983Li19), 9.20 {I30} (1980Ch38), 9.1 {I7} (1979Se05); 9.19 {I14} (1979Vo09); 9.2 {I6} (1974HeYW); 9.8 {I2} (1974Ra30); 9.5 {I6} (1971Si20); 9.3 {I3} (1967Ki08); 9.3 {I11} (1967Hi04); 9.7 {I6} (1967Do07); 9.2 {I9} (1967Ca18); 8.9 {I6} (1967Ba21); 8.8 {I9} (1966Ar16). Other: 8 {I2} (1967Ja05). Minimum uncertainty of 3% is assumed in values prior to that of 2020Ke08 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=1.195 {I10} (2020Ke08); 1.189 {I10} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=11.017 {I15} (2010-Ghumman) 
$440|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.159 {I10}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=-0.001 {I10} (1977Al34) 
$440|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}=-0.485 {I80} (1969Ba32) 
$(440|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.073 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I15} (1977Al34) 
$(440|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.067 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.010 {I8} (1979Vo09) 
$(440|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.048 {I9}, G{-4}A{-4}=+0.009 {I6} (1976Si08, NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$(440|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.054 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I24} (1970Bl12, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$Ice(K)=15.2 {I5}, Ice(L)=2.0 {I1} (1997Sa53). Ice(K)=10.9 {I6} (1979Vo09) 
MR$weighted average of +0.77 {I10} (1977Al34, |g|g(|q)); and the following values evaluated by 1977Kr13: +0.59 {I5} (1976Si08, |g|g(|q)); +0.62 {I7} (1974Bh02); +0.62 {I+10-8} (1970Bl12, |g|g(|q)); +0.70 {I9} (1969Ba32, |g(|q,H,t), previous value was +0.82 {I65} in 1961We07); +0.62 {I6} (1968Ra28); +0.56 {I6} (1966Go25); +0.59 {I7} (1963Sp07); +0.69 {I+13-10} (1961Sa13); +0.63 {I5} (1960Bo17). 1977Kr13 evaluation gives +0.62 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 530.95 {I10} (1961Ew02), 531.01 {I7} (1967Hi04, crystal), 531.016 {I22} (1974HeYW), 531.05 {I4} (1979Se05), 530.979 {I18} (1979Vo09), 531.002 {I27} (1980Ch38), 531.00 {I4} (1983Li19), 531.069 {I24} (1997Sa53, authors' uncertainty of 0.006 increased by evaluator). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$normalizing |g ray, 1% uncertainty assigned by evaluator. I|g=100.0 {I10} (2020Ke08); 100 (1999Po32); 100.0 {I8} (1997Sa53); 100.0 {I20} (1995Go44); 100 (1983Li19), 100 (1980Ch38), 100 {I7} (1979Se05); 100.0 {I20} (1979Vo09); 100 {I6} (1974HeYW); 100 (1974Ra30); 100.0 {I28} (1971Si20); 100 (1967Ki08); 100 (1967Hi04); 100 (1967Ja05); 100 (1967Do07); 100 (1967Ca18); 100 {I6} (1967Ba21); 100 (1966Ar16) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=13.11 {I13} (2020Ke08); 13.019 {I53} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=100.0 {I5} (2010-Ghumman) 
$531|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.074 {I2}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=-0.002 {I2} (1977Al34) 
$531|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}=-0.300 {I12} (1969Ba32) 
$Ice(K)=100 {I2}, Ice(L)=15.3 {I5} (1997Sa53). Ice(K)=100 {I5}, Ice(L)=13.1 {I7} (1979Vo09). Ice(K)=100 {I7} (1967Ba21) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34). 1977Kr13 evaluation gives -0.54 {I12} based on |g(|q,H,t) data in 1969Ba32, 1961We07 and 1957Bi86 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1983Li19 only, with tentative placement. Note that this |g was not reported in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) work of 1977Ko24. This |g is not reported by 2020Ke08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 541.85 {I5} (1979Se05), 541.70 {I5} (1983Li19), 541.83 {I7} (1997Sa53) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0831 {I61} (2020Ke08); 0.098 {I8} (1983Li19), 0.098 {I16} (1979Se05). Others: 0.14 {I2} (1997Sa53); 0.20 {I5} (1966Ar16) seem discrepant. 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.0109 {I8} (2020Ke08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1983Li19 only. This |g was reported in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) work of 1977Ko24. This |g not reported in 2020Ke08 
M$based on |a(K)exp and |g(|q) in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 149.4 {I2} (1979Se05), 149.40 {I6} (1983Li19), 149.3 {I2} (1997Sa53) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.022 {I5} (2020Ke08); 0.029 {I3} (1997Sa53); 0.032 {I3} (1983Li19); 0.024 {I12} (1979Se05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.0029 {I6} (2020Ke08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 191.24 {I9} (1979Se05), 191.18 {I6} (1983Li19), 191.0 {I3} (1997Sa53) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.024 {I8} (2020Ke08); 0.028 {I3} (1997Sa53); 0.036 {I3} (1983Li19); 0.025 {I13} (1979Se05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.0032 {I10} (2020Ke08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 272.30 {I4} (1979Se05) and 272.30 {I5} (1983Li19). Other: 271.87 {I6} (1997Sa53) seems discrepant 
RI$weighted average of 0.0886 {I18} (2020Ke08); 0.099 {I7} (1997Sa53); 0.102 {I10} (1983Li19); 0.098 {I25} (1979Se05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.01161 {I24} (2020Ke08) 
$(272|g)(410|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.283 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.015 {I18} (1979Se05, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$Ice(K)=0.68 {I6} (1997Sa53) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1979Se05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: E|g=589.35 {I4} (1974HeYW), 589.35 {I6} (1979Se05), 589.52 {I13} (1979Vo09), 589.32 {I4} (1983Li19), 589.33 {I4} (1997Sa53, authors' uncertainty of 0.02 increased by evaluator). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Hi04, 1967Do07, 1967Ba21, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30, 1980Ch38 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.2860 {I84} (2020Ke08); 0.29 {I2} (1997Sa53); 0.344 {I4} (1995Go44, uncertainty seems underestimated, increased to 0.035); 0.29 {I2} (1983Li19); 0.31 {I3} (1980Ch38); 0.287 {I25} (1979Se05); 0.30 {I3} (1979Vo09); 0.350 {I34} (1974HeYW); 0.29 {I8} (1974Ra30); 0.37 {I4} (1971Si20); 0.31 {I14} (1967Hi04); 0.26 {I6} (1967Do07); 0.28 {I4} (1967Ba21); 0.40 {I6} (1966Ar16) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.0375 {I11} (2020Ke08); 0.034 {I3} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$Ice(K)=0.29 {I8} (1979Vo09) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
$I|g=0.475 {I13} (2010-Ghumman) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 680.52 {I15} (1974HeYW), 680.39 {I5} (1979Se05), 680.42 {I4} (1983Li19), 680.36 {I5} (1997Sa53). E|g=681.05 {I22} (1979Vo09) seems discrepant. Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Hi04, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30, 1980Ch38 
RI$weighted average of I|g=0.1236 {I84} (2020Ke08); 0.122 {I7} (1995Go44); 0.12 {I1} (1983Li19); 0.123 {I6} (1979Se05); 0.149 {I32} (1974HeYW). Others: 0.22 {I1} (1997Sa53), 0.3 {I1} (1980Ch38), 0.30 {I5} (1979Vo09), 0.06 (1974Ra30), 0.32 {I15} (1971Si20), 0.23 {I16} (1967Hi04), <0.05 (1967Do07). Values from 1997Sa53, 1980Ch38, 1979Vo09 and 1971Si20 seem high as compared to precise and consistent I|g data in 2020Ke08, 1979Se05 and 1995Go44. 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.0162 {I11} (2020Ke08) 
$I|g=0.153 {I11} (2010-Ghumman) 
M$from |a(K)exp in {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average 154.92 {I5} (1979Se05), 154.92 {I5} (1983Li19), 154.7 {I2} (1997Sa53). Other: 154 {I1} (1967Ja05) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.045 {I7} (2020Ke08); 0.052 {I4} (1983Li19); 0.0545 {I22} (1995Go44, uncertainty seems underestimated); 0.043 {I7} (1979Se05). Value of 0.031 {I3} in 1997Sa53 seems discrepant. Other: <0.5 (1967Ja05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.0059 {I9} (2020Ke08) 
$I|g<0.072 (2010-Ghumman) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 196.64 {I7} (1961Ew02), 196.66 {I3} (1967Hi04, crystal), 196.64 {I4} (1974HeYW), 196.64 {I3} (1979Se05), 196.616 {I30} (1979Vo09), 196.69 {I5} (1983Li19). Others: E|g=196.448 {I5} (1997Sa53, uncertainty seems underestimated, and discrepant in energy); E|g=196.797 {I40} (1980Ch38) also seems discrepant. Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 1.394 {I24} (2020Ke08); 1.42 {I1} (1997Sa53); 1.329 {I22} (1995Go44); 1.42 {I6} (1983Li19), 1.33 {I10} (1980Ch38); 1.28 {I10} (1979Se05); 1.38 {I6} (1979Vo09); 1.56 {I13} (1974HeYW); 1.4 {I4} (1974Ra30); 1.36 {I22} (1971Si20); 1.0 {I1} (1967Do07); 1.30 {I13} (1967Ca18); 1.53 {I15} (1967Ba21); 1.3 {I2} (1966Ar16); with minimum 3% uncertainty assumed in 1997Sa53 and 1995Go44 Others: 1.92 {I16} (1967Ki08, seems discrepant), 2 {I1} (1967Ja05), 1.5 {I6} (1967Hi04) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.1828 {I32} (2020Ke08); 0.174 {I6} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=2.14 {I6} (2010-Ghumman) 
$196|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.005 {I45}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=+0.033 {I51} (1977Al34) 
$(197|g)[398|g](91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.034 {I34}, A{-4}=+0.026 {I51} (1977Al34) 
$Ice(K)=20.7 {I8}, Ice(L)=2.6 {I2} (1997Sa53). Ice(K)=22 {I2}, Ice(L)=3.0 {I15} (1967Ba21) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$weighted average of -0.27 {I10} from |g|g(|q) and -0.11 {I15} from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34). 1977Kr13 evaluation gives +0.50 {I2} from 1974Bh02, 1961Sa13 and 1960Bo17; all from |g|g(|q) using NaI(Tl) detectors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 275.36 {I8} (1961Ew02), 275.42 {I2} (1967Hi04, crystal), 275.374 {I15} (1974HeYW), 275.36 {I2} (1979Se05), 275.419 {I22} (1979Vo09, authors' uncertainty of 0.011 increased by evaluator), 275.396 {I45} (1980Ch38), 275.37 {I4} (1983Li19). Other: E|g=275.209 {I5} (1997Sa53, uncertainty seems underestimated, and is discrepant in energy). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 5.96 {I11} (2020Ke08); 6 {I1} (1999Po32); 5.93 {I7} (1995Go44, uncertainty increased to 3% ); 6.04 {I14} (1983Li19); 6.24 {I21} (1980Ch38); 5.5 {I4} (1979Se05); 6.05 {I10} (1979Vo09); 6.1 {I4} (1974HeYW); 6.7 {I7} (1974Ra30); 5.7 {I4} (1971Si20); 6.8 {I14} (1967Hi04); 6.1 {I5} (1967Do07); 6.5 {I7} (1967Ca18); 6.4 {I4} (1967Ba21); 6.6 {I7} (1966Ar16). Others: 6.81 {I6} (1997Sa53); 7.9 {I4} (1967Ki08) seem discrepant. Other: 7 {I2} (1967Ja05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.781 {I14} (2020Ke08); 0.776 {I9} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=7.034 {I11} (2010-Ghumman) 
$275|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=+0.025 {I12}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=0.000 {I13} (1977Al34) 
$91|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}=+0.13 {I6} (1969Ba32) 
$(275|g)(320|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.006 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I5} (1979Se05, NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$(275|g)(411|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.013 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I30} (1979Se05, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$(276|g)(319|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.008 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I19} (1977Al34) 
$(276|g)(410|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.048 {I78}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I12} (1977Al34) 
$(276|g)[319|g](91|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.030 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.049 {I26} (1977Al34) 
$(276|g)(319|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.019 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.011 {I11} (1976Si08, NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$(276|g)(319|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.079 {I22}, A{-4}=-0.038 {I29} (1970Bl12, Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors) 
$Ice(K)=41.5 {I15}, Ice(L)=5.6 {I3} (1997Sa53). Ice(K)=37.5 {I25}, Ice(L)=3.6 {I9} (1979Vo09). Ice(K)=45 {I9} (1967Ba21) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$weighted average of +0.107 {I7} (1979Se05, |g|g(|q)); +0.14 {I5} from |g|g(|q) and +0.14 {I3} from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34); +0.10 {I4} (1969Ba32, |g(|q,H,t), value as given in 1977Kr13, earlier value was 0.14 {I2} in 1961We07). 1977Kr13 evaluation gives +0.14 {I1} based on |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) data in 1976Si08, 1974Bh02, 1970Bl12, 1969Ba32, 1966Go25, 1963Sp07, 1961We07, 1961Ar09 and 1960Bo17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 594.74 {I10} (1961Ew02), 594.80 {I3} (1974HeYW), 594.84 {I6} (1979Se05), 594.793 {I24} (1979Vo09), 594.859 {I45} (1980Ch38), 594.79 {I3} (1983Li19), 594.783 {I21} (1997Sa53, authors' uncertainty of 0.003 increased by evaluator). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Hi04, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 1.853 {I20} (2020Ke08); 2.0 {I3} (1999Po32); 1.852 {I22} (1995Go44, uncertainty increased to 3%); 1.81 {I5} (1983Li19); 1.63 {I10} (1980Ch38); 1.89 {I16} (1979Se05); 1.92 {I6} (1979Vo09); 2.03 {I13} (1974HeYW); 2.0 {I3} (1974Ra30); 2.06 {I19} (1971Si20); 2.08 {I24} (1967Ki08); 1.9 {I4} (1967Hi04); 1.6 {I2} (1967Do07); 1.9 {I2} (1967Ba21). Others: 2.12 {I2} (1997Sa53); 2.2 {I2} (1967Ca18); 2.2 {I2} (1966Ar16) seem discrepant. Other: 2 {I1} (1967Ja05) 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.2429 {I26} (2020Ke08); 0.253 {I5} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=1.24 {I3} (2010-Ghumman) 
$595|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=+0.047 {I36}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=+0.001 {I37} (1977Al34) 
$(595|g)(91|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.043 {I38}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I54} (1977Al34) 
$Ice(K)=1.13 {I7} (1997Sa53), 0.78 {I8} (1979Vo09), 1.0 {I6} (1967Ba21) 
$|b(595|g) coin from 1960We06 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$|d|>6 from |g|g(|q) and |>7 from |g(|q,H,t) (1977Al34). This value is consistent with ce data which give dominant E2 1977Kr13 evaluation gives |d=+0.55 {I5} from 1974Bh02, 1968Ra28, 1963Sp07 and 1961Sa13; all from |g|g(|q) data using NaI(Tl) detectors. But this value is inconsistent with |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) data from 1977Al34, as well as with ce data from 1997Sa53 and 1979Vo09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average: 685.80 {I10} (1961Ew02), 685.902 {I35} (1974HeYW), 685.89 {I4} (1979Se05), 685.889 {I28} (1979Vo09), 685.953 {I35} (1980Ch38), 685.89 {I3} (1983Li19), 685.792 {I32} (1997Sa53, authors' uncertainty of 0.008 increased by evaluator). Other less precise E|g using Ge(Li): 1967Do07, 1967Ca18, 1967Hi04, 1967Ja05, 1967Ba21, 1967Ki08, 1971Si20, 1974Ra30 
RI$weighted average of 6.25 {I11} (2020Ke08); 6.63 {I5} (1997Sa53); 6.21 {I7} (1995Go44); 6.24 {I13} (1983Li19), 6.07 {I15} (1980Ch38), 6.6 {I5} (1979Se05); 6.1 {I2} (1979Vo09); 6.2 {I4} (1974HeYW); 6.7 {I6} (1974Ra30); 6.5 {I4} (1971Si20); 6.4 {I4} (1967Ki08); 5.9 {I10} (1967Hi04); 6 {I1} (1967Ja05); 5.9 {I4} (1967Do07); 6.6 {I7} (1967Ca18); 7.0 {I4} (1967Ba21); 7.0 {I7} (1966Ar16); with minimum uncertainty of 3% in values measured prior to 1998. 
$Measured absolute (per 100 decays) I|g=0.819 {I14} (2020Ke08); 0.815 {I8} (2020KoZZ, preliminary value) 
$I|g=5.148 {I11} (2010-Ghumman) 
$686|g(|q,H,t): B{-2}U{-2}A{-2}=-0.116 {I9}, B{-4}U{-4}A{-4}=+0.002 {I10} (1977Al34) 
$686|g(|q,H,t): G{-2}U{-2}F{-2}=-0.329 {I6} (1969Ba32) 
$Ice(K)=3.4 {I2} (1997Sa53), 3.1 {I6} (1979Vo09), 3.4 {I5} (1967Ba21) 
$|a(K)exp=0.0068 {I4} (1997Sa53), 0.0066 {I13} (1979Vo09), 0.0065 {I15} (1967Ba21) 
M$from |a(K)exp 
MR$from |g(|q,H,t); weighted average of -0.95 {I30} (1977Al34); and -1.05 {I65} (1969Ba32; previous value was -0.95 {I33} in 1961We07). 1977Kr13 evaluation gives -0.97 {I27} from |g(|q,H,t) date of 1969Ba32 and 1961We07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$no |g-ray peak was observed in 2012Da16. The measured energy spectrum was fitted within the energy range 88-95 keV to set the limit for partial T{-1/2} for |a decay of {+151}Eu to the first excited level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI I(75.8|g)/I(630|g in {+148}Sm)=0.0128 {I21} (unweighted average of 0.0105 {I22} (1970Gr09), 0.011 {I4} (1962Re03), 0.017 {I5} (1963Ba31)) 
M |a(K)exp=2.5 {I8}, K:L:M+=790 {I120}:90 {I18}:18 {I8} (1963Ba31), K:L1:L3=|?6:1:<1 (1961Ha23), L1:L2+L3=100 {I10}: |<10 (1970GrYP) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
M L1:L2:L3=|<15:300 {I20}:300 {I20} (1970GrYP), K:L2:L3=weak:100:100 (1961Ha23), K:L:M+=<80:880 {I110}:290 {I60} (1963Ba31); ce(L)(61.5|g)/ce(L)(75.5|g)=10 {I2} (1963Ba31) 
CC E4 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 5 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$22.7-keV transition cannot be pure E2 or have large E2 admixture, as deduced B(E2)(W.u.) of 3230 {I100} is much larger than RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (p,2n|g). Same energy is given in (d,n|g). Intensity is not known well in |b{+-} and (d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$ce data in {+149}Nd |b{+-} give M1,E2 but negative A{-2} for 275|g(|q) in (p,2n|g) supports M1 or M1+E2 with small |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=443.9 
E,RI$from (d,3n|g); in (p,2n|g) value of 200 seems to be in error, perhaps, due to incorrect split of intensity in two locations (558 and 655 levels) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (p,2n|g). Same energy in |b{+-}, but with no uncertainty; I|g=62 {I25} in |b{+-}, as the 721 level is weakly populated in decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=750.47. Uncertainty increased to 0.20 keV in the fitting procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 281.3 {I1} (p,2n|g) and 281.5 {I2} (d,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 16.1 {I29} (p,2n|g) and 19.0 {I16} (d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 250.3 {I2} (p,2n|g) and 250.7 {I3} (d,3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 40 {I8} (p,2n|g) and 70 {I10} (d,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M$(D+Q) from |g(|q) data deduced from A{-2}=+0.13 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} for 269.8|g+270.1|g, using theoretical |g(|q) for 270.1|g (E1 with |DJ=0) and attenuation factor (for A{-2})=+0.17 derived from 155|g(|q). (M1+E2) in 1979Ko35 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E1 in 1996Jo19 
RI$1996Jo19 give relative to 446.8|g; but from their Fig. 2, it should be relative to 246.9|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=114.066 {I11}, I|g=65.13 {I7} (2003Me01) 
MR$average of 0.180 {I24} from L1/L2=8.5 {I20} and L1/L3=14.5 {I30} and +0.14 {I5} from A{-2}=0.30 {I4} in |g(|q) (1987Si13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=74.932 {I4}, I|g=12.45 {I10} (2003Me01) 
MR$from L2/L1=1.6 {I3} and L3/L1=1.5 {I2}. Other: >+0.1 (|g|g(|q),1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=188.7832 {I23}, I|g=6.99 {I3} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M3/E2)<1 from |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2}, but A{-2}=-0.19 {I8} in |g(|q) (1987Si13) is consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=97.354 {I17}, I|g=4.414 {I4} (2003Me01) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also gives -1.3 {I3} but is inconsistent with <0.14 from |a(K)exp=1.8 {I4} and K/L=8.8 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=211.4403 {I20}, I|g=100.0 {I18} (2003Me01) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). Others: -0.44 {I10} from A{-2}=-0.35 {I3} in |g(|q) (1987Si13); 0.39 {I15} from K/L=6.5 {I8}, |a(K)exp=0.146 {I15} and (L1+L2)/L3=15 {I+15-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=240.4660 {I18}, I|g=12.289 {I22} (2003Me01) 
$|g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}B{-2}=-0.11 {I2} (1989SiZQ) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.47 {I4} and K/L=5.2 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=30.077 {I26} (2003Me01) 
|d(E2/M1)>0.7 from L1/L3<0.076 and L2/L3=0.8 {I+3-2}, but E2 required from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1968He19 
$E|g=59.652 {I8}, I|g=7.66 {I13} (2003Me01) 
$(59|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=156.048 {I3}, I|g=2.307 {I5} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.03 {I3} from A{-2}=0.26 {I3} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.059 {I9} gives <0.012 
$(156|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I1} (1986Ii01). Others: 1970Se11, 1966Go05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=270.2449 {I16}, I|g=38.513 {I11} (2003Me01) 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.34 {I3} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). Other: <0.05 from |a(K)exp=0.014 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=288.2516 {I25}, I|g=2.331 {I14} (2003Me01) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in {+150}Nd(p,2n|g) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |d=+1.9 {I2} is also possible from |g|g(|q). Others: |d=+0.74 {I17} or +2.0 {I6} from A{-2}=-0.71 {I9} in |g(|q) (1989SiZQ); |a(K)exp=0.062 {I16} is consistent with all |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=245.847 {I21}, I|g=3.618 {I15} (2003Me01) 
$(246|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1986Ii01) 
E$deduced from 245.699 {I8} for doublet (1968He19) and I|g (1979Sc12) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also gives |d>+30 but is inconsistent with |d<1.1 from |a(K)exp=0.13 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=199.066 {I5}, I|g=5.58 {I5} (2003Me01) 
MR$from |d=-0.1 to +2.3 (|g|g(|q),1986Ii01) and <0.5 from |a(K)exp=0.20 {I3} and K/L=8 {I2} 
$|g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}B{-2}=0.00 {I3} (1989SiZQ) 
$(199|g)(74|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.31 {I6}, A{-4}G{-4}=-0.10 {I15} (1986Ii01). Data are corrected by 1986Ii01 for unresolved components 74.6|g, 75.7|g 
$(199|g)(189|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=-0.03 {I2}, A{-4}G{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1986Ii01) 
$(199|g)(74|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.095 {I22}, A{-4}=0.0 (1970Se11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=208.3210 {I21}, I|g=10.526 {I9} (2003Me01) 
MR$from A{-2}=0.047 {I31} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01) gives +0.04 {I4} or -3.9 {I7} and |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3} gives <0.9 
$(208|g)(74|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}G{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1986Ii01). Data are corrected by 1986Ii01 for unresolved components 74.6|g and 75.7|g 
$(208|g)(189|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.00 {I1}, A{-4}G{-4}=0.02 {I2} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=282.5292 {I25}, I|g=2.071 {I12} (2003Me01) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also allows >+5 or <-11 but is inconsistent with +0.8 {I7} from A{-2}=-0.70 {I11} in |g(|q) (1987Si13) and <3.5 from |a(K)exp=0.071 {I18} 
$(282|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=301.097 {I9}, I|g=1.24 {I4} (2003Me01) 
$|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.1 {I3} (1989SiZQ) 
MR$+0.02 {I11} or +3.1 {I+16-9} from A{-2}=0.15 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8} (1986Ii01) for (301|g)(114|g)(|q). |a(K)exp=0.040 {I25} is consistent with all |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=213.9414 {I20}, I|g=1.159 {I7} (2003Me01) 
MR$+0.34 {I5} or +8 {I+4-2} from (230|g)(214|g)(|q) (1986Ii01). |a(K)exp=0.15 {I5} is consistent with all |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=311.059 {I3}, I|g=1.76 {I3} (2003Me01) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also allows +2.6 {I9} but is inconsistent with |d=+0.22 {I13} or >8 from A{-2}=-0.08 {I11} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.047 {I11} is consistent with all |d 
$(311|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=192.171 {I3}, I|g=2.207 {I15} (2003Me01) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.14 {I2} and A{-2}=-0.42 {I17} in |g(|q) (1987Si13) 
$(192|g)(270|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.145 {I30}, A{-4}G{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1986Ii01). Assuming A{-2}=0.204, A{-4}=0.0 for 3/2-(E2)7/2-(E1)7/2+ cascade, G{-2}=0.71 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=244.89 {I15}, I|g=0.36 {I12} (2003Me01) 
MR$-0.16 {I24} or -5 {I2} from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01) 
$(245|g)(270|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I15}, A{-4}=0.02 {I21} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=275.469 {I5}, I|g=1.529 {I8} (2003Me01) 
$|g(|q): A{-2}=0.7 {I3} (1989SiZQ), probably includes 277.0|g also 
MR$+0.23 {I23}, >+2.4 or <-15 from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |a(K)exp=0.071 {I21} is consistent with all |d. |g(|q) in (p,2n|g) forbids pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=267.7873 {I16}, I|g=21.811 {I8} (2003Me01) 
MR$average of |d=+0.20 {I8} (|g|g(|q),1986Ii01) and +0.28 {I7} (|g(|q,H,t), 1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.076 {I8} and K/L=7.5 {I12} give 0.5 {I3} 
$|g(|q): A{-2}=0.50 {I7} (1987Si13,1989SiZQ) 
$(268|g)(156|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1986Ii01). Others: A{-2}=0.173 {I12}, A{-4}=0.00 (1970Se11); A{-2}=-0.142 {I9}, A{-4}=0.020 {I11} (1970Be67) 
$(268|g)(270|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1986Ii01). Others: 1970Se11, 1970Be67, 1966Sv01, 1966Go05, 1965Ch09 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=326.6331 {I17}, I|g=16.589 {I16} (2003Me01) 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.36 {I6} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3} gives <0.14 
$(327|g)(97|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1986Ii01) 
$(326|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1986Ii01). Others: A{-2}=0.109 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I10} (1966Go05); A{-2}=-0.230 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I9} (1970Be67) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=349.365 {I4}, I|g=8.540 {I10} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.04 {I4} from A{-2}=0.29 {I4} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.017 {I5} gives <0.3 
$(349|g)(189|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.032 {I7}, A{-4}=0.007 {I15} (1970Be67) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=423.5600 {I20}, I|g=25.25 {I4} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.03 {I9} from A{-2}=-0.40 {I5} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.0065 {I16} gives <0.17 
$(423|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=-0.103 {I10}, A{-4}G{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1986Ii01). G{-2}=0.76 {I8} (1986Ii01) was obtained assuming A{-2}=-0.135 {I7} (average A{-2} from 1970Se11,1970Be67,1966Sv01 and 1966Go05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement from 2003Me01. Poor fit. Level-energy difference=447.88 
$E|g=448.82 {I9}, I|g=0.038 {I15} (2003Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=139.357 {I7}, I|g=2.33 {I8} (2003Me01) 
$ce(K) not reported by 1967Ba27 although peak should have been prominent in the electron spectrum. K conversion line reported by 1966He04 but no intensity given. 
MR$from A{-2}=0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I11} for (139|g)(245|g)(|q) and A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} for (139|g)(275|g)(|q) (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=229.630 {I3}, I|g=1.771 {I9} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.06 to +1.1 from A{-2}=-0.74 {I15} in |g(|q) (1987Si13); <0.14 from |a(K)exp=0.024 {I14} 
$(230|g)(214|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=258.144 {I3}, I|g=1.573 {I20} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)<0.26 from |a(K)exp<0.046 
$(258|g)(208|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=294.969 {I7}, I|g=3.33 {I7} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.11 {I22} from A{-2}=-0.34 {I9} in |g(|q) (1987Si13), <0.26 from |a(K)exp<0.03 
$(295|g)(245|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=366.682 {I3}, I|g=1.858 {I17} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.04 {I11} from A{-2}=0.09 {I8} in |g(|q) (1987Si13); <0.31 from |a(K)exp<0.021. |a(K)exp also gives E2 but inconsistent with |g(|q) data 
$(367|g)(288|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=443.550 {I3}, I|g=4.221 {I25} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)<0.17 from |a(K)exp<0.007 
$|g(|q): A{-2}=0.35 {I6} (1989SiZQ) 
$(444|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.083 {I25}, A{-4}=0.11 {I20} (1970Be67) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=540.513 {I26}, I|g=23.911 {I16} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)=-0.23 {I28} from A{-2}=0.370 {I25} in |g(|q) (1987Si13); <0.24 from |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I16} 
$(540|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1986Ii01). Others: 1970Se11, 1970Be67, 1966Sv01, 1966Go05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=654.838 {I3}, I|g=27.608 {I22} (2003Me01) 
$|d(M2/E1)<0.2 from |a(K)exp=0.0022 {I6} 
$|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.436 used to determine orientation parameter |b{-2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=555.77 {I3}, I|g=1.77 {I13} (2003Me01) 
M$1967Ba27 give |a(K)exp<0.026 for the 555.88+556.83 doublet which allows E1, E2 or M1 for either or both transitions. 
E$1968He19 give 556.43 {I5} as average energy for this doublet. 
$|g(|q) for doublet: A{-2}U{-2}B{-2}=-0.13 {I2} (1989SiZQ) 
$(556|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=750.15 {I14}, I|g=0.12 {I9} (2003Me01) 
E$poor fit; level-energy difference=750.41; |g|g from 2003Me01. Uncertainty was increased to 0.2 keV in the least-squares fitting procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=498.06 {I7}, I|g=0.119 {I25} (2003Me01) 
E$other: 498.03 {I8} (1968He19) for a doublet 
RI$from |g|g (1979Sc12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement from 2003Me01 
E$level-energy difference=992.66 
$E|g=992.08 {I27}, I|g=0.013 {I8} (2003Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$2003Me01 quote E|g=652.744 {I7}, I|g=2.646 {I15}. There is no evidence of such a strong line in the spectra of 1979ScZL and 1968He19. This line is probably mainly from background or impurity. There is some |g|g coin evidence of this line in table 2 of 2003Me01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=771.91 {I4}, I|g=0.10 {I5} (2003Me01), but no evidence of such a line in 1979ScZL and 1968He19. Intensity must be much weaker than 0.10 if this line is from {+149}Nd decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=835.18 {I6}, I|g=0.124 {I8} in 2003Me01 is probably the same |g, although 2003Me01 place it from 1391 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$0.31 {I18} (2003Me01), but no evidence of such a line in 1979ScZL and 1968He19. Intensity must be much weaker than 0.31 if this line is from {+149}Nd decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=681.47 {I15}, I|g=0.023 {I4} (2003Me01) 
E$from 1979Sc12. Others: 681.92 {I9} (1968He19), 681.47 (1986Ii01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$0.149 {I9} (2003Me01), but no evidence of such a line in 1979ScZL and 1968He19. Intensity must be much weaker than 0.149 if this line is from {+149}Nd decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$If E1, B(E1)(W.u.)=8.1|*10{+-7}~{I17}; if M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=7.4|*10{+-5}~{I16}; if E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.14~{I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q). |d=0.8~{I2} from K/L=2.3~{I4}. |d=+1.8~{I3} is also possible from |g|g(|q) but is inconsistent with K/L ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L)exp, estimated from combined ce(K)(69|g)+ce(L)(32|g) by subtraction of calculated ce(K)(69|g) component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice corrected for E2 transitions from 255.7 and 427.1 levels 
MR$from (171|g)(139|g)(|q), consistent with 0.3~{I3} from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$Estimates of |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp involve large corrections for Ice(M) of 139|g and 176|g, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$|g not observed but inferred from several triple cascades like (249|g)(16|g)(333|g) to yield I(|g+ce)=1~{I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from (424|g)(117|g)(|q) and from (301|g)(424|g)(|q) 
$For |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp, Ice(K,L) of 1969BoZG reduced by 12% to allow for contributions from ce(K) and ce(L) lines of unresolved 422|g, 426|g, 427|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$For |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp, Ice(K,L) reduced to allow for contributions from ce(K) and ce(L) lines of unresolved 407|g 
MR$+0.03~{I3} or +4.1~{I5} from (402|g)(175|g,90|g)(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$For |a(K)exp, Ice(K) of 1969BoZG reduced by 40% to allow for contributions from ce(K) and ce(L) lines of unresolved 550|g, 577|g, 589|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$For |a(K)exp, Ice(K) of 1969BoZG reduced by 20% to allow for contribution from ce(K) and ce(L) lines of unresolved 739|g 
MR$-0.1~{I1} or -1.4~{I2} from (736|g)(117|g)(|q). |a(K)exp gives E1 or E2+M1 with |d>2.1 
M$from consistency of ce and |g|g(|q) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$For |a(K)exp, Ice(K) of 1969BoZG reduced by 10% to allow for contribution from ce(K) and ce(L) lines of unresolved 798|g 
M$from |a(K)exp and (798|g)(117|g)(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$For |a(K)exp, Ice(K) of 1969BoZG reduced by 20% to allow for contribution from ce(K) and ce(L) lines of unresolved 912|g, 913|g, 919|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E This energy is not in agreement with those of the 45- and 85-keV |g's; the level energies give a value of 150.9. This, and the very different I{-|g} values for this |g, suggest that this |g does not belong here. 
RI other: 1.3 {I4} (1993ZhZW). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CC Deduced from |g|g coincidence intensities in {+154}Nd |b{+-} decay. See the comment in that data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E1 for 89.69|g is incompatible with M1 for 63.94|g and E1 for 70.78|g (with all multipolarities from 1993GrZZ in |b{+-} decay), reason for which no multipolarity is adopted for 89.69|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=8.20|*10{+-8} {I28}; if E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.82|*10{+-4} {I13}; if E1, B(E1)(W.u.)=8.85|*10{+-10} {I30}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$If E2, reduced hindrance factor (f{-|n})=22 {I2} (2021Yo08) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=3.34|*10{+-9} {I22}; if E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.04|*10{+-6} {I27} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition proposed from 313|g in coin with 197|g (2021Yo08). This transition was not observed due to self absorption and large internal conversion 
$I(|g+ce)=9 {I4} from transition intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$2021Yo08 mentioned that the 789-keV peak could contain the |g ray from the LaBr{-3} detectors in the experimental setup but concluded that it was mainly from the decay of the isomer. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$observed indirectly as ce(K)+811 proton line in the proton spectrum from {+131}Eu decay (1999So17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from a simulation of the observed proton spectrum which contained a peak due to 811 proton+ce(K)(122|g). See 1999So17 for details of the input parameters, including the conversion coefficient for 2+ to 0+ transition, in the simulation procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$stretched D from R(DCO) and |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); assumed (E1) based on systematics of negative parity bands in this mass region. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$R(DCO) in (HI,xn|g) consistent with stretched Q or pure non-stretched D. Observed decay of |p=- side band 1 into |p=- side band 2 supports the latter. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
M$R(DCO)=1.11 {I5} consistent with stretched Q or pure non-stretched D. Observed decay of |p=- side band 1 into |p=- side band 2 support the latter (1993Pa07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 346.7 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay, 346.6 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g), and 346.9 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and |g-ray anisotropy in {+138}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 399.0 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 399.0 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 
RI$from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 745.6 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 745.7 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 
RI$from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). Other: 49 from {+138}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 544.5 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay, 544.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g), and 544.9 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and |g-ray anisotropy in {+138}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 338.0 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 338.0 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 
RI$from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). Other: 74 from {+138}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 737.2 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 737.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 
RI$from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 652.9 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 652.7 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 685.6 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay, 685.4 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g), and 685.9 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and |g-ray anisotropy in {+138}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 648.8 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 648.8 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 706.2 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 706.1 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 775.1 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay, 775.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g), and 775.2 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and |g-ray anisotropy in {+138}Eu |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 768.1 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay and 768.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 931.8 {I3} from {+138}Eu |e decay, 931.9 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g), and 931.9 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 552.1 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 552.3 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 520.3 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 520.5 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
RI$from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$un weighted average of 677.0 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 676.0 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
RI$from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). Other: 80 from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g) 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 754.3 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 754.7 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 356.3 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 356.6 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 611.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 611.6 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 712.8 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 713.0 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 656.6 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 657.0 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 701.6 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 701.2 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 795.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 795.3 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 862.3 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 863.1 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 914.9 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 915.0 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 732.9 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 733.3 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 
M$also from |g(DCO) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 494.6 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 495.4 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 547.2 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 547.4 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 824.0 {I2} from {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g) and 825.1 {I3} from {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1994Pa27 in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g), but a very discrepant value 688.9 {I2} is reported in 1987Pa30 (same first author as 1994Pa27) in {+104}Pd({+37}Cl,2np|g). The evaluator has adopted the more recent one. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$estimated from spectrum of low-energy |g's and K| x ray's in coin with 190.1|g and calculated I|g(K| x ray)'s (evaluators). 
M$M1,E2 from decay scheme. E2 from I(|g+ce) and estimated I|g (evaluators). 
TI$from 223.5|g-190.1|g coin, corrected for |a. Uncertainty estimated by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$Placement from {+110}Pd({+34}S,5n|g) (evaluators). 
RI$from I|g(190|g)/I|g(454)=0.97 {I22} in {+110}Pd({+34}S,5n|g) and I|g(453|g)=100 (evaluators). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.25 {I8} (1996Br33) 
M$D,E2 from comparison to RUL (evaluators); |DJ|p=2, from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M$based on angular correlation measurement for 459|g-531|g cascade in Coulomb excitation dataset (2015Kl01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$I(|g+ce)(44|g)/I(|g+ce)(202.6|g)=0.3 from (HI,xn|g) (1988Ba22) 
M$D from comparison to RUL and |DJ|p=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LE
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$I(|g+ce)(39|g)/I(|g+ce)(241|g)=1.6 from (HI,xn|g) (1988Ba22) 
M$D from comparison to RUL; |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
%I|g=3.2 {I4}, using the calculated normalization. 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I11}, A{-4}=+1.03 {I17} for 1068|g-531|g cascade (2015Sa40,2015Kl01) 
M$|DJ=2, E2 |g based on angular correlation coefficients 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) is the average of 0.25 {I+2-1} and 0.21 {I+2-1} obtained using two different methods of normalization 
RI$10200 {I140} for 63|'-71|', 13840 {I170} for 71|'-82|', 13780 {I170} for 95|'-112|', 6860 {I120} for 112|'-125|' 
$E2 matrix element=1.11 {I3}; B(E2)=0.25 {I+2-1}, when normalized to Coulomb excitation yield for {+94}Mo target 
$E2 matrix element=1.02 {I+4-3}; B(E2)=0.21 {I+2-1}, when normalized to the known lifetime of the first 2+ state in {+140}Sm 
$E2 diagonal matrix element=+0.03 {I+54-20}; Q(spectroscopic)=+0.02 {I+41-15}, when normalized to Coulomb excitation yield for {+94}Mo target 
$E2 diagonal matrix element=-0.17 {I+51-19}; Q(spectroscopic)=-0.13 {I+38-14}, when normalized to the known lifetime of the first 2+ state in {+140}Sm 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) is the average of 0.35 {I5} and 0.35 {I+4-5} obtained using two different methods of normalization 
RI$47 {I22} for 63|'-71|', 150 {I33} for 71|'-82|', 306 {I60} for 95|'-112|', 300 {I110} for 112|'-125|' 
M,MR$mostly pure |DJ=0, E2 |g based on angular correlation coefficients: (98% {I+2-4})E2+(2% {I+4-2})M1 (2015Sa40) 
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I8} for 460|g-531|g cascade (2015Sa40,2015Kl01) 
$E2 matrix element=1.33 {I+8-9}; B(E2)=0.35 {I5}, when normalized to Coulomb excitation yield for {+94}Mo target 
$E2 matrix element=1.32 {I+8-9}; B(E2)=0.35 {I+4-5}, when normalized to the known lifetime of the first 2+ state in {+140}Sm 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Transition was not observed in the present work, only an upper limit was used in the GOSIA analysis to deduce B(E2) value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2) is the average of 0.30 {I2} and 0.29 {I2} obtained using two different methods of normalization 
RI$118 {I18} for 63|'-71|', 209 {I24} for 71|'-82|', 389 {I34} for 95|'-112|', 199 {I23} for 112|'-125|' 
$E2 matrix element=1.63 {I5}; B(E2)=0.30 {I2}, when normalized to Coulomb excitation yield for {+94}Mo target 
$E2 matrix element=1.61 {I5}; B(E2)=0.29 {I2}, when normalized to the known lifetime of the first 2+ state in {+140}Sm 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$(531|g)(1098|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.25 {I17}, A{-4}=1.12 {I25} 
$2021Sa33 report an intensity of I|g=1.1 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,DE$calculated by 1977De25 ({+141}Eu |e decay (40.7 s)) by observing five pairs of relatively intense non-coincident |g rays, 384.5-382.9, 395.6-394.0, 594.7-593.1, 597.9-596.3 and 1083.6-1081.9 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,DE$calculated by 1977De25 by observing five pairs of relatively intense non-coincident |g-rays, 384.5-382.9, 395.6-394.0, 594.7-593.1, 597.9-596.3 and 1083.6-1081.9 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$from DCO data. Others: 1.17 {I+41-29} from |g(|q) data 
ECC$from transition intensity balance 
$R(ADO)=1.11 {I7} 
$Recalculated for this evaluation: B(M1)=2.94 {I98} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
Transition seen in ce spectrum, L1/L2=0.20 {I35}, L2/L3=1.25 {I25} 
I(|g+ce)=121 {I40} from L| x ray, I(|g+ce)=95 from intensity balance (1975Ke08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from figure 3 in 2014Ra03 and table supplied in e-mail reply of Feb 10, 2014 by the authors, |g not listed in table II of 2014Ra03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.50 {I20}. R(|q)=1.62 {I15} 
$Sign of A{-4} should be negative for stretched quadrupole (compilers' note) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.48 {I13}. R(|q)=1.46 {I21} 
$Sign of A{-4} should be negative for stretched quadrupole (compilers' note) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a=4.2 {I4} from balance of I(|g+ce) for 2510 level (1974Ko29); |a=5.5 {I10} from balance of I(|g+ce) for 2586 level. They can be compared with |a(E2)=6.40 and |a(M1)=3.72 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M 1967Ge13 observed ce corresponding to this transition but no |g-ray of this energy has been observed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I7}. Other: 0.0010 {I2} (1978VyZX). Ice(K)=0.103 {I22}, I|g=0.108 {I13} (1998Om01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.035 {I24} in conflict with placement. Other: |a(K)exp=0.021 {I14} (1978VyZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from 1996Vy01 based on |a(K)exp. Mult not consistent with suggested |p=- for 2340 level in 1996Vy01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$d,E2 from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I5}. Other: 0.0088 {I47} (1978VyZX) mult=(M2) in 1996Vy01 based on |a(K)exp is in conflict with J|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$doublet line is assumed by 1995Va40, |DE|g in coincidence measurement can not identify what level of 1380-1381 doublet is populated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$poor fit; the level energy difference equals 2203.55 {I3}. 
MR$ from 1992Ad04; +4.6 {I+19-12} or +0.43 {I+8-9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From combination of |a (1962Fu16) and I|g data (1966Bu03). 
E$doublet line: 633.2 and 634.5 keV in {+146}Eu |e+|b{++} decay (1966Bu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1+M2]
decay_comment:
E$determined by 1970An18 from internal conversion spectra. 
RI$from I(ce)K and |a(K){-th} 
M$see comment to 665.4|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$665.40 {I13} in 1970An18 
RI$from I(ce)K and |a(K){-th} 
M$deduced from I(664.7|g+665.4|g), |a(K){-th} and acceptable multipolarities for both |g's (1970An18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.42 {I5} (1975Si03) 
$Ice(K)(888|g+889|g)=14.5 {I16} (1976Ad08), |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I11} calculated taking into account of |a(K)(889|g,E1)=0.0011 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value of |d=-1.25 {I25} (1975Si03) 
E$poor fit; the level energy difference equals 899.614 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)(1057.62|g+1058.71|g)=2.09 {I10} (1976Ad08), |a(K)exp=0.0022 {I17} calculated taking into account of |a(K)(1058|g,E1)=0.000798 {I12} 
MR |<-0.88 or |>+11 (1992Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)(1132|g+1133|g)=0.42 {I10} (1976Ad08), |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I6} calculated taking into account of |a(K)(1132|g, E1)=0.000706 {I10} 
MR$the 2{+nd} value is +1.14 {I18}, |a(K)=0.00201 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$doublet line in 1995Va40, |DE|g from coincidence measurement can not define what of 1380-1381 doublet levels is populated. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$doublet line, poor fit; the level energy difference equals 2649.56 {I6}. The |g ray is placed from 3397.65 keV level also. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+(M1)
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value of |d=0.15 {I5} (1975Si03) 
E$poor fit; the level energy difference equals 1296.938 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$M1 from |a(K)exp (calculated |a(K)=0.00566), but decay scheme requires E1. Hence, if placement is correct, it must be E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$the 2{+nd} value of |d=-3.0 {I5} corresponds to |a(K)=0.000776 {I15}. I(ce)=0.09 {I3} (1976Ad08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K:L:M=0.14 {I4}:0.045:0.015 (1965Ba43) 
RI$according to the table 6 of 1995Va40, 1447.12, 1448.21, 1448.1 |g' bring the insignificant contribution to intensity of the 1445.1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
EKC$Excess of experimental value above calculated, apparently, is caused by the contribution to a conversion line of a doublet 2389.00|g, I|g=0.057. 
E$poor fit; the level energy difference equals 2389.283 {I18}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K:L:M=1.02 {I15}:0.17 {I6}:0.06 (1965Ba43) 
MR$other value 0.01 {I6} (1984Kr02), at that |a(K)=0.00230 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$calculated from ce(K)(2010.37|g+2011.38|g)=0.026 {I5} (1969AdZW), and |a(K)(2010.37|g, E1)=0.000267 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$calculated from ce(K)(2080.02|g+2081.11|g)=0.222 {I17} (1976Ad08), and |a(K)(2080.02|g, E1)=0.000253 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+(M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR $from reanalyzed data of 1984Kr02 by 1992Ad04; -0.18|<|d|<+2.0 in this case 0.000259 {I17}|<|a(K)|<0.0007 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+1.4 {I+4-3} or -0.04 {I+11-10} for J=3-, and +4.6 {I+19-12} or +0.43 {I+8-9} for J=4- 
E$poor fit; the level energy difference equals 2203.53 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
TI$from intensity balance at 2797.3 keV level taking into account branching ratio of 986.0|g E3 (1995Ba57) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
TI$calculated by evaluators from |g branching ratio=0.03, mult=E3 (1995Ba57) and I(|g+ce) of 60.5 and 197.3 |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$|a(IPF)/T=1.606|*10{+-5} {I24} 
M$from 1998Bi11 
TI,RI$calculated by evaluators from I(|g+ce) branching ratio |?0.007 (1998Bi11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI,ECC$doublet with 632.95|g, E1 from 1380.18 keV level: I|g(634.05)/I|g(632.95)=0.79 {I2} from |e decay (1992Ad04) 
M$from 'Adopted Gammas' 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6}; A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I2} (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI,ECC$doublet with 702.35|g E1: I|g(703.60)/I|g(702.35)=0.93 {I9} from |e decay (1992Ad04) 
M$from 'Adopted Gammas' 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$doublet with 411.35|g from 4194.9 level (1980Ko07); I|g(410.80)/I|g(411.35)=1.2 {I4} from (|a,4n|g) 1978Ki11 
M$D, |DJ=0 from |g(|q), A{-2}=+0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} (1980Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I1} (1975Si03) 
RI,ECC$doublet with 1058.5|g from this level: I|g(1058.5)/I|g(1057.8)=1.7 {I3} from |e decay (1992Ad04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.35 {I7} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.26 is a misprint in 1980Ko07; A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.26 {I6} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I2}, |DJ=1 stretched (1978Ki11) 
RI$Doublet, other 788.8|g {I1} from 3011.2 level. I|g(788.7)/I|g(788.8)=2 taken from fig. 8 of 1975Si03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.53 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I11} (1978Ki11) 
RI$doublet with 582.95|g from 3183.2 keV level: I|g(583.5)/I|g(582.9)=2.2 (from fig. 8 in 1975Si03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.30 {I10} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.22 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I15}, |DJ=1 stretched (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.43 {I3} (1975Si03); A{-2}=+0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I2} (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I8}; A{-2}=-0.30 {I10} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, |DJ=1 stretched (1978Ki11); D from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.20 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5}; A{-2}=+0.55 {I9} (1975Si03); A{-2}=+0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$doublet with 370.0|g from 4461.4 level: I|g(369.3)/I|g(370.0)=0.14 {I6}. A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I10}; A{-2}=-0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I4} from (|a,4n|g) of 1978Ki11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.32 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6}; A{-2}=-0.39 {I7} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I7}, |DJ=1, stretched; D, E2 from RUL (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.53 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I11} for doublet (1978Ki11) 
RI$see comment for the 2667.1 keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$from weighted average of |a(K)exp=0.11 {I4} (1980Ko07) and 0.25 {I5} (1975Si03) 
RI$doublet with 558.1|g from 4341.1 keV level: I|g(556.9)/I|g(558.1)=12 {I8}, A{-2}=+0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5}, |DJ=0; A{-2}=+0.39 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} from (|a,4n|g) of 1978Ki11; A{-2}=+0.30 {I5} (1975Si03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.10 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I8}; A{-2}=-0.11 {I4} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.02 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I3}, D+Q |DJ=1 (1978Ki11). D, E2 from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6}; A{-2}=-0.20 {I10} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5}, D stretched, |DJ=1 (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
EKC$from weighted average of |a(K)exp=0.11 {I4} (1980Ko07) and 0.25 {I5} (1975Si03) 
MR$from |a(K)exp 
$A{-2}=-0.29 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I10}; A{-2}=-0.30 {I10} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5}, |DJ=1 (1978Ki11); D, E2 from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.40 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I7}; A{-2}=+0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.108 {I4} (1978Ki11); A{-2}=+0.35 {I9} (1975Si03) 
RI$doublet in 1975Si03 is not suggested by 2012Ku07, 1978Ki11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.53 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I11} for doublet with 556.9|g from 3354.6 keV level, I|g(556.9)/I|g(558.1)=12 {I8} from 1978Ki11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$see comment for 3166.9 keV level 
$A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.39 {I3} (1975Si03); A{-2}=-0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I4} (1978Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$D+Q, |DJ=1, A{-2}=-0.18 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I2}; A{-2}=-0.17 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I2} (1978Ki11). D, E2 from RUL. |a(K)exp agrees with E1 mult., which conflicts with |g(|q) data 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$-0.33 {I3} from {+147}Eu |e decay (1962Sc09); -0.278 {I20} (same dataset, 1989Ad10) not adopted because adopted T{-1/2} would be different from T{-1/2}(B(E2)|^) (see T{-1/2} comment in Coulomb excitation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from {+147}Eu |e (1989Ad10). Others (same dataset): 0.00 {I4} from A{-2}=+0.056 {I9} (1970Va38) (601|g)(197|g)(|q), -0.08 {I6} from A{-2}=+0.075 {I11} (1970Be67), -0.03 {I9} from A{-2}=+0.064 {I19} (1966Go26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from {+147}Eu |e (1989Ad10). Others (same dataset): -0.47 {I4} from A{-2}=+0.126 {I4} (1970Va38), -0.47 {I5} from A{-2}=+0.128 {I11} (1966Go26), -0.48 {I5} from A{-2}=+0.130 {I8} (1970Be67) via (678|g)(121|g)(|q); see also 1962Al19, 1962Sc09, 1964Mc17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR via (956|g)(121|g)(|q) (1966Go26). +0.18 {I+5-4} from (1970Be67). Others: 1962Sc09, 1964Mc17, 1970Va38 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 |DJ=0,1 from {+147}Sm(n,n'|g) based on |g(|q) 
MR$|d=-1.5 {I6} if |DJ=0 or -1.6 {I16} if |DJ=1 from {+147}Sm(n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2, |DJ=0,1 from {+147}Sm(n,n'|g) based on |g(|q) 
MR$|d=-1.0 {I7} if |DJ=1; -0.10 {I+15-12} or 2.1 {I10} 6 if |DJ=0 from {+147}Sm(n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g/100 |b's (semi)=0.00273 {I18} (1970Mo02), 0.00293 {I14} (1971Mc09), 0.0030 {I3} (1973HaXY). Others: 1956La17, 1957St05, 1966Pr11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 87 {I3} (1989Ad09) and 85.9 {I11} (2014Mi17) 
$|a(K)exp=0.76 {I4} 
MR$-0.33 {I3} from L1:L2:L3=63 {I9}:15 {I2}:10 (1962Sc09), sign from |g|g(|q); -0.278 {I20} (1989Ad10), see also comments in Adopted Gammas and Coulomb excitation. For other |d from |g|g(|q), see 1977Kr13 
K:L1+L2:L3=450 {I40}:73 {I7}:10 {I1} (1966Av02) 
|a(K)exp=1.05 {I6} (1962Sc09), 0.70 (1987Ad03). 


