# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Spin-flip M1 transition 
$Number of counts=95 {I13}, with a peak significance of 7.4|s and reduced |h{+2}=1.2 
E$Doppler-shift corrected. Statistical and systematic uncertainty of 2 keV each are added in quadrature (compiler) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E from evaluation of 2000He14. 
MR from measured |a value (1964Kr04) 
CC measured value (1964Kr04). Theoretical value interpolated from tables of 1976Ba63 are 7.73x10{+-7} for M1 and 2.96x10{+-6} for E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$ from 2006Uk01, this |g is seen in coin with 2050|g. Energy uncertainty=1.9 (statistical), 0.6 (systematic) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$An anomaly was observed in the angular distribution of emitted e{++}+e{+-} pairs that is consistent with emission of a J|p=1+ neutral isoscalar boson with mass {Im{-0}c{+2}}=16.70 MeV {I35} (stat) {I50} (sys) and a branching ratio of 5.8|*10{+-6}, relative to the |g-decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
For comments on branching ratio see (1974Aj01). Also note branching ratio from (1969Ro12). Branching=17 {I+6-10} and 83 {I+10-6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Also note that (1969Al17) deduced branching ratios that were not reproducible. This problem causes their reported observation of {+10}Be(6.18:0+) to g.s.(0+) decay not to be accepted; see discussion in (1975Wa06). 
E from (1969Al17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From energy level difference. 
RI$In this activation measurement, cascades via intermediate states are unobserved. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
BE1 E({+11}Be)=43 MeV/A yields B(E1)=0.06 e{+2}fm{+2} 1 (1995An20). E({+11}Be)=64 MeV/A yields B(E1)=0.099 e{+2}fm{+2} 10 (1997Na08). E({+11}Be)=57-60 MeV/A yields B(E1)=0.094 e{+2}fm{+2} 11 (1997Fa11). These compare with B(E1)=0.116 e{+2}fm{+2} 12 deduced from lifetime measurements (1983Mi08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$The value B(E1)=0.00102 {I2} is deduced via Gosia analysis while B(E1)=0.00098 {I4} is deduced via XCDCC analysis. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$E0 matrix element (0+ to 0+)=0.87 efm{+2} {I3} (2007Sh34). This value corresponds to about 0.25 Wilkinson unit (2007Sh34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
RI$From annihilation radiation observed at 509.6 keV {I25} from the e{++}e{+-} pair formation due to 2246, E0 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$(2007Sh34) list B(E2)=(0.87 {I7})|*B(E2)(sp), where B(E2)(sp)=Weisskopf single particle unit for a 0+ to 2+ E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ Annihilation radiation observed from the e{++}e{+-} pair from E0 transition 
$E0 matrix element (0+ to 0+)=0.87 efm{+2} {I3} (2007Sh34). This value corresponds to about 0.25 Wilkinson unit (2007Sh34) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
WIDTHG From weighted average of 2.48|*10{+-2} eV {I29} (2003Ba51) and 2.53|*10{+-2} eV {I12} (2003Ju04). Other values are 2.47|*10{+-2} eV {I42} (1983Fi13) 5.0|*10{+-2} eV {I25} (1966Pa16). 
E(|g) from E(level). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|w|g (eV)=4.1|*10{+-2} {I4} 
B(E2)(|_)=21 e{+2}fm{+4} 2 (1985Ne05). Also see (1966Al06) where |G{-|g}=0.020 eV {I4} yields B(E2)=23 {I5}, when c.m. systematics are accounted for properly. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M3
decay_comment:
$NCSM Branching=3.342|*10{+-7}%. 
$(2024Ku19) suggested that this M3 transition is enhanced due to clustering effects in both the {+10}B{-g.s.} and {+10}B*(IAS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$High energy tail of this peak in |g spectrum suggested by 2005Ka06 as containing small fraction of second excited state in {+15}B. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
Branching ratios from (1983Wi09). 
Branching ratios from (1979An16) had not separated the 9.64 and 9.78 MeV resonances. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E see Ajzenberg 1955 (private communication from Bent). Also (1962Fr06). Also see 6800 keV {I200} in (1962Fr06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|G{-|g1} from |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.150 {I18} (1977Ad02). See also (1972Al03) who found I{-|g}(12.1 MeV|)0)=(15 {I4})% and I{-|g}(12.1 MeV|)4.44 MeV)=(85 {I4})%, which implies |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.17 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From (1977Ad02), see also (1972Al03) who found I{-|g}(12.1 MeV|)0)=(15 {I4})% and I{-|g}(12.1 MeV|)4.44 MeV)=(85 {I4})% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The authors give branching=96.6 {I+17-13} for decay to {+12}C*(0,4.4 MeV). The evaluator has divided 96.6 into the {+12}C{-g.s.} and {+12}C*(4.4 MeV) branches using the branching ratios given in Adopted data set 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The authors give branching=92.7 {I10} for decay to {+12}C*(0,4.4 MeV). The evaluator has divided 92.7 into the {+12}C{-g.s.} and {+12}C*(4.4 MeV) branches using the branching ratios given in Adopted data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|G{-7.65|)4.4}/|G=(0.22 {I10})% is deduced from {+12}C(p,p') 
$|G{-7.65|)4.4}/|G=(0.18 {I6})% is deduced from {+12}C(|a,|a') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|G{-12.7|)4.4}/|G=(0.23 {I12})% is deduced from {+12}C(p,p') 
$|G{-12.7|)4.4}/|G=(0.28 {I28})% is deduced from {+12}C(|a,|a') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$(2023Sa36) measured the |g-ray yield of N{-|g}{+P}=2023 {I255} for the {+12}C*(4.44 MeV, 2{++}{-1})|){+12}C{-g.s.} transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$From (1980Wa24) {+10}B(|a,p|g). See also E{-|g}=3088.95 keV {I19} from {+12}C(n,|g):E=th (1982Mu14,2008FiZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$From E{-|g}=595.5 {I2} (1982Mu14) and 595.16 keV {I9} (2008FiZZ). from {+12}C(n,|g):E=th. 
RI$From (1982Mu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$From (1980Wa24) who used B(E2) from (1970Wi04) {+13}C(e,e') and |t{-m} to obtain |d=-0.094 {I9}. See also |d=-0.096 {I+30-21} (1966Po11), |d=-0.154 {I54} (1973Go02) and |d=-0.100 {I8} (1969Wi22, 1970Wi04). 
E$From E{-|g}=3684.0 {I2} (1982Mu14), 3683.94 keV {I17} (1967Pr10), and 3684.02 keV {I7} (2008FiZZ) from {+12}C(n,|g):E=th. See also E{-|g}=3685.041 keV {I20} (1991Li12) {+13}C(|g,|g). 
RI$From (1982Mu14) 
M$From (1980Wa24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3+M2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$From (1966Po11) |g|g angular correlations in {+12}C(d,p|g). 
E$From (1969Li07). 3853.183 keV {I21} is deduced from E{-x} and level-energy difference. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
WIDTHG$From (1980Ho11) {+13}C(|g,n{-0}). The decay |g ray is reported in (1971HiZF) {+11}B({+3}He,p|g). 
MR$Deduced from |G{-|g}(E2)=0.115 eV {I7} and |G{-|g}(M3)=1.01|*10{+-5} eV {I61}, which are the electromagnetic partial widths determined in (1969Wi22, 1970Wi04) {+13}C(e,e'). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
WIDTHG0$From (1980Ho11) {+13}C(|g,n{-0}). The decay |g ray is observed in (2001Ne09) {+16}O(n,|a|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$From |G{-|g0} deduced from analysis of (1968Co27, 1977Ma16, 1978Hi06, 1969Wi22, 1970Wi04) 
M,MR$From |G{-|g0}(M1)=22.7 eV {I27} and |G{-|g0}(E2)=0.59 eV {I11} (1969Wi22, 1970Wi04) {+13}C(e,e'). See also |d{+2}=0.009 {I+18-8} and |d=0.095 {I7} (1968Di04) from {+12}C(p,|g), which is used in earlier studies of the analog transition since the {+13}C and {+13}N |ds are expected to be similar. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$See (1986Cu02,1988La25,1993Da17,1997Mu04) 
RI$(1997Mu04), see also 63% (1986Cu02: 3850|)3090 not observed), 63.4% (1988La25). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Measured in (1980Wa24). E{-|g} also reported in (1960Pi09, 1968Ri16, 1983La17, 1997He11, 2020Li08). 
M$(1960Pi09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From (1960Ka13,1960Pi09). 595.013 keV {I11} is deduced from results in (1980Wa24). 
M$(1960Ka13). 
RI$From (1980Wa24). See also I|g=6.5|*10{+-3} {I10} (1960Ka13) and 9.3|*10{+-3} {I20} (1960Pi09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From (1956Ma52). 3683.921 keV {I23} is deduced in from results in (1980Wa24). See also E{-|g}=3730 keV {I60} (1953Sh64: transitions from 3.68 or/and 3.85|)g.s.). E{-|g} also reported in (1954St20: very weak except at the E{-|a}(res)=1.51 MeV, where 16% of the total proton counts contributed to this decay, 1968Ri16, 1969Li07, 1983La17, 1997He11, 2007Ma58, 2020Li08). 
RI$From (1980Wa24). 
M$(1980Wa24). See also (1960Ka13: M1). 
MR$From (1980Wa24: using B(E2)=3.63 {I40} from (1970Wi04: {+13}C(e,e')) and |t{-m}=1.59 fs {I13} from (1991Aj01)). 
$|G{-|g}=0.40-0.75 eV (1960Ka13: M1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Measured in (1980Wa24). See also E{-|g}=210 keV {I30} (1953Sh64: about 30% decays to g.s. via 3.68 state), 169.5 keV {I4} (1956Ma52), 180 keV (1960Pi09), 170 keV (1983La17). 
RI$From (1980Wa24). See other values: I(3.85|)3.68)/I(3.85|)g.s.)=0.32 {I7} (1960Pi09), 0.55 {I3} (1969Li07). See also (1956Ma52: 3.85 MeV level decays through the 3.68 MeV level with a probability 0.24 {I5}). 
M$(1960Pi09; 1956Ma52: though M1 is not excluded). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Measured in (1980Wa24). See also E{-|g}=765 keV {I8} (1960Ka13,1960Pi09). 
RI$From (1980Wa24). See other reported values: I(3.85|)3.09)/I(3.85|)g.s.)=9.3|*10{+-3} {I20} (1960Pi09), 2.5|*10{+-2} {I5} (1969Li07). Transitions to the 3.09 MeV not observed in (1956Ma52) with the intensity <3% concluded. 
M$(1960Pi09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$From (1969Li07). 3853.170 keV {I22} is deduced from results in (1980Wa24). See also E{-|g}=3844 keV {I15} (1956Ma52). E{-|g} also reported in (1960Pi09, 1968Ri16, 1983La17, 1995He40, 1997He11, 2007Ma58, 2020Li08). 
RI$From (1980Wa24). See other reported values in (1960Pi09, 1969Li07) above and I(3.85|)g.s.)/I(3.85|)3.68|)g.s.)=7:3 (1954St20). 
M$(1960Pi09). 
$|G{-|g}(FWHM)=4.5 keV (1969Li07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$See I{-|g}(*3089.5 keV {I4})=0.43 {I2} (1982Mu14) and I{-|g}(*3088.80 keV {I21})=0.373 {I56} (2008FiZZ). 
$If 3.1 MeV |g-ray occurs, its intensity is |<0.10 |g/capture (1953Ba18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$See I{-|g}(*595.5 keV {I2})=0.24 {I1} (1982Mu14) and I{-|g}(*595.16 keV {I9})=0.274 {I25} (2008FiZZ); I{-|g}<0.6 (1967Th05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$See I{-|g}(*3684.0 {I2})=32.14 {I64} (1982Mu14), E{-|g}(*3683.94 {I17}) (1967Pr10), E{-|g}=3683.915 {I15} (1990Wa22: deduced value). I{-|g}(*3684.02 {I7})=29.7 {I10} (2008FiZZ), I{-|g}(3680 {I50})=30 (1953Ba18), I{-|g}(3680 {I20})=25 (1958Gr01), I{-|g}(3680)=31 (1961Ja19), I{-|g}(3684)=34 {I2} (1967Th05), I{-|g}(3684)=31.0 {I4} (1982Ju01), I{-|g}(*3683.72 {I14})=32 {I1} (1968Sp01: from 3684.28 {I14}, the E|g recoil corrected value given in the text) 
$If 3.9 MeV |g-ray occurs (transition 3850|)0), its intensity is <0.06 |g/capture (1953Ba18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$See I{-|g}(*1261.6 keV {I1})=32.36 {I44} (1982Mu14), E{-|g}=*1261.92 {I6} (1967Pr10), E{-|g}=*1261.7 {I4} (1972Op01: from 1261.9 {I4}, the E|g recoil corrected value given in the text), E{-|g}=1261.847 {I33} (1980Wa24: deduced), E{-|g}=1261.765 {I28} (1983Ra04: listed as a calibration line) I{-|g}(*1261.71 {I6})=31.2 {I8} (2008FiZZ), I{-|g}(1260 {I15})=25 (1958Gr01), I{-|g}(1270)=30 (1961Ja19), I{-|g}(1262)=34 {I2} (1967Th05), I{-|g}(*1261.61 {I7})=32 {I1} (1968Sp01: from 1261.76 {I7}, the E|g recoil corrected value given in the text), 
$|s(|g)=1.14 mb {I2}, S-factor(dp)=0.1 with R=2.91 fm (1982Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$See I{-|g}(*1856.6 keV {I4})=0.16 {I1} (1982Mu14) and I{-|g}(*1856.98 keV {I22})=0.193 {I40} (2008FiZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$See I{-|g}(4945.32)=67.47 {I92} (1982Mu14), E{-|g}=4946 {I1} (1965Ja09), E{-|g}=*4945.46 {I17} (1967Pr10), E{-|g}=4945.328 {I20} (1982Va13: deduced from Q{-0}), I{-|g}(*4945.30 {I7})=68.6 {I20} (2008FiZZ), I{-|g}(4948 {I8})=70 (1953Ba18), I{-|g}(4950 {I15})=75 (1958Gr01), I{-|g}(4946)=69 (1961Ja19), I{-|g}(4945)=66 {I3} (1967Th05: I{-|g}<0.2 for capture state|)3848 transition), I{-|g}(*4944.8 {I6})=68 {I1} (1968Sp01: from 4945.8 {I6}, the E|g recoil corrected value given in the text), I{-|g}(4946)=68.6 {I9} (1982Ju01), I{-|g}(4945)=68.4 {I5} (1986Ke14). 
$|s(|g)=2.38 mb {I5}, S-factor(dp)=1.1 with R=2.91 fm (1982Mu14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Measured (1980Wa24); see also E{-|g}=3082 keV {I7} (corrected for Doppler shift) and 3097 keV {I5} (uncorrected) (1952Th24), 3110 keV {I12} (1961Go29). E{-|g} also reported in (1960Go19, 1961Go29, 1968Al03, 1995Ro28, 1997Pa43: E{-thres}=428 keV, 2000El08, 2014Cs03, 2014Cs08). 
RI$See (1962Si08,1966Ka05); the absolute E{-|g} yield is 1.55 {I7} (2000El08) 
M$See (1952Th24,1962Si08,1966Ka05,1968Al03). 
$|G{-|g}>0.066 eV (1968Ri16: Doppler shift). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 595.013 keV {I11}, which is from the level-energy difference derived from |g rays measured in (1980Wa24). 
RI$From (1980Wa24); see also I{-|g}=1.6% {I3} (1975Tr07), 1% (1966Ka05) and 0.6% (1962Si08). 
M$See (1962Si08, 1966Ka05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$From (1956Ma52). See 3683.921 keV {I23}, which is from the level-energy difference derived from |g rays measured in (1980Wa24). See also E{-|g}=3740 keV {I30} (1955Be62: corrected for Doppler shift (required)), 3687 keV {I15} (1961Go29), 3760 keV {I20} (1955Be62: uncorrected), 3690 keV {I20} (1956Ma52: uncorrected). E{-|g} also observed in (1960Go19, 1961Go29, 1962Si08, 1966Ka05, 1966Po11, 1973Go02, 1975Tr07, 1997Pa43: E(thres)=1122 keV, 2000El08, 2014Cs03). 
RI$From (1980Wa24); see also I{-|g}=98.4% {I3} (1975Tr07), 99% (1966Ka05) and 100% (1962Si08). The absolute E{-|g} yield is 1.14 {I6} (2000El08). 
$|G{-|g}>0.025 eV (1968Ri16: Doppler shift). |G(E2)/|G{-|g}</|?5% (1962Fl06). 
M$See (1962Si08, 1966Ka05, 1966Po11, 1973Go02). 
MR$From -0.096 {I+30-21} (1966Po11). See also |d= -0.154 {I54} (1973Go02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Measured (1980Wa24); see also E{-|g}=169.5 keV {I4} (1956Ma52), 169.25 keV {I4} (1969Al17: recoil energy E{-R}=1 eV), 169.3 keV (2000El08), 170 keV (1962Si08, 1966Po11, 1968Go14, 1976Dy05, 1997Pa43). E{-|g} also reported in (1960Ch01, 1960Ch12, 1966Go15, 1966Ka05, 1975Ra29, 1975Tr07). 
RI$From (1980Wa24); see also I{-|g}=37% {I4} (1966Go15: the |g-ray intensity ratio, (total 3.68)/3.85=0.59 {I7}), 36.0% {I7} (1975Tr07), 24% {I5} (1956Ma52: the |g-ray intensity ratio, (total 3.68)/3.85=0.46), 24% (1962Si08, 1966Ka05, 1966Po11), 30% (1975Ra29). 
M$See (1962Si08, 1966Ka05). M1 cannot be excluded although the internal conversion coefficient, 1.4|*10{+-4} {I3}, is consisitent with E1 (1956Ma52). 
$|M{+2}(E1)=0.01 W.u. (1962Si08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Measured (1980Wa24). E{-|g} also reported in (1962Si08, 1966Go15, 1966Ka05, 1975Ra29, 1975Tr07). 
RI$From (1980Wa24); see also I{-|g}=0.93% {I20} (1962Si08), 0.6% {I2} (1975Tr07), 1% (1966Go15, 1966Ka05, 1975Ra29), not detected (1956Ma52: <3%, 1966Po11). 
M$See (1962Si08, 1966Ka05). 
$|M{+2}(E2)=2.00 W.u. (1962Si08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3+M2
decay_comment:
E$3853.170 keV {I22}, which is from the level-energy difference derived from |g rays measured in (1980Wa24); see also E{-|g}=3860 keV {I20} (1955Be62: uncorrected for Doppler shift (not required)), 3844 keV {I15} (1956Ma52), 3863 keV {I15} (1961Go29), 3840 keV {I30} (1955Be62: corrected for Doppler shift). E{-|g} also reported in (1960Go19, 1961Go29, 1962Si08, 1966Go15, 1966Ka05, 1966Po11, 1968Al03, 1974Be48, 1975Ra29, 1975Tr07, 1977He12, 1997Pa43: E(threshold)=1321 keV, 2000El08, 2014Cs03). No |g-rays are observed with E{-|g}=3.9-5.8 MeV with intensity >10% of the 3.85 MeV |g-ray (1955Be62). 
RI$From (1980Wa24); see also I{-|g}=62% {I4} (1966Go15), 63.4% {I8} (1975Tr07), 75% (1962Si08,1966Ka05), 76% (1966Po11) and 69% (1975Ra29). The absolute E{-|g} yield is 6.92 {I4} (2000El08). 
$|w=0.61 rad/ps {I5} which leads to the nuclear g-factor=0.59 {I5} (1974Be48); see also g-factor=0.558 {I15} (1981Ru04) and g-factor=0.60 {I5} (1973RaZH). The sign was found to be negative (1976Dy05). 
$|M{+2}(E3)=3.3 {I+42-20} single-particle unit or 17.5 W.u. {I+225-104} (one standard deviation) (1966Po11), |M{+2}(M2)=0.90 W.u. (1962Si08). |M{+2}(E3)=2.0 {I10} single-particle unit (1975Ra29) using |G(E3,single particle)=2.6|*10{+-7} eV (1966Po11). 
$|G(E3,single particle)=2.6|*10{+-7} eV (1966Po11), |G(E3)=5.2|*10{+-7} eV {I26} (1975Ra29), |G(M2)=3.61|*10{+-5} eV {I23} (1975Ra29) using Branching=69% {I4} (average value of (1956Ma52,1966Go15) and the mixing ratio E3/M2=+0.12 {I3} (1966Po11)). |G(E3)/|G{-|g}</|?2% (1962Fl06) 
MR$From (1966Po11). 
$|b{-0}=4.40% {I5} (1977He12: average). 
$|G{-|g}(Doppler shift)=8.8|*10{+-5} eV {I30} (1962Si08), 4.4|*10{+-5} eV {I6} (1968Al03): see Table VI in (1968Ri16), 7.3|*10{+-5} eV {I16} (1968Ri16). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$|G{-|g}>0.066 eV (1968Ri16: Doppler shift method). 
E$See also (1985Ki07). 
$Angular distributions of E{-|g}=3.09 MeV are isotropic, consistent with the J=1/2 assignment for 3.09 MeV state (1957Ba29,1960Ba35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|G{-|g}>0.025 eV (1968Ri16: Doppler shift method). Angular distributions of E{-|g} were studied (1957Ba29, 1960Ba35). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=GT;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A no-core shell model (NCSM) prediction finds |t=81 fs and |B(M1)=0.063 |m{+2}{-N}. 
E$Compare with E{-|g}=2217 keV {I2} in (2012Pe16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$Shown in 2008On02, but not in 2009On02. The measured spectrum may show weak support for this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Assignment to (1/2+) state based upon retarded feature of the 3/2|)1/2 transition and the prompt nature of the observed |g rays. (2005El07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
BE2$from B(E2)=7.5 {I+30-17}(stat) {I+10-4}(syst) e{+2}fm{+4} (2011Pe21). See also (2016Pr01, 2017Pr04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
WIDTHG$From |G{-|g}=0.52 eV {I4} (2002SeZY) {+208}Pb({+13}N,{+12}C+p), and the {+12}C(p,|g) values 0.45 eV {I5} (1968Ri16), 0.53 eV {I5} (1992Hi14), 0.49 eV {I3} (2023Sk02), 0.48 eV {I3} (2023Ke11: includes 2008Bu19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M,MR$From angular distribution and a{-2}=-0.64 {I4} in (1974Ro29) {+12}C(p,|g) . See also |d=-0.092 (1963Yo06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |G|g0(M1)=24.2 eV {I15} and |G|g0(E2)=0.32 eV {I12}; |d{+2}=0.013 {I5} deduced from {+12}C(p,|g{-0}) angular distributions in (1975Ma21, 1977Ma16). See also |d{+2}=0.095 {I7} (1968Di04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From angular distributions and a{-2}=-0.64 measured in (1974Ro29). 
RI$In (1954Wo09), the partial widths |G{-|g1}=0.04 eV and |G{-|g0}=0.7 eV are given (5%:95%); |G{-|g0}=0.7 eV is from |w|g=1.39 eV in (1952Se01). Later, (1963Yo06) claim agreement and show I|g=5% and 95%, respectively. In (1974Ro29) uncertainties of 1% are added to the branching ratios of (1954Wo09); however (1974Ro29) reported I|g=8% {I1} for |g{-1}. In (1991Aj01) |G{-|g1}=0.06 eV and |G{-|g0}=0.64 eV (8.5%:91.5%) were adopted based on an analysis of (1952Se01,1963Yo06) given in (1980Ba54) and using the I{-|g1}=8% {I1}, which is the only related value that is reported with an uncertainty. We accept the branching ratio given in (1974Ro29); however we accept the partial |G{-|g0} width from the R-matrix analysis in (2023Ke11) as detailed above where |G{-|g0}=0.49 eV {I3} (|d=0.038 {I6}: |G{-|g0}(M1)=0.49 eV {I3} and |G{-|g0}(E2)=0.49 eV {I3}). See also |d(E2/M1)=-0.09 {I2} (1974Ro29) from {Ia2}=-0.64 {I4} compared with |d(E2/M1)=-0.092 from {Ia2}=-0.65 reported in (1963Yo06). 
E$From (1987Po09); see also 3501.5 keV (1989Ki21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$From angular distributions measured in (1975Ma21) 
$(1968Di04): |G{-p0}|G{-|g0}/|G=5.5 eV {I8}, I(E2/M1)=-0.095 {I7}. Then, |G{-|g0}=27 eV {I5} assuming |G{-p0}/|G=0.200 eV {I25} (1967AdZY) 
$(1975Ma21, 1977Ma16): |G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G=5.79 eV {I20}, I(E2/M1)=-0.013 {I5} and |G{-|g0}/|G{-p0}=0.121 {I11}. Assuming |G{-p0}/|G=0.236 {I12} from (1973Ad02) gives |G{-|g}(M1)=24.2 eV {I15}, |G{-|g}(E2)=0.32 eV {I12}, and B(M1)W=0.342 {I21} and B(E2)W=0.28 {I11}; I(E2/M1)=0.013 {I5}. See discussion in (1975Ku21). Also see (1975Ma21, 1977Ma16) where {+11}B({+3}He,n|g) data are used to deduce |g-ray partial widths |G{-|g(2+3)}=19.6 eV {I14}, |G{-|g1}|<2.82 eV {I30}, |G{-|g0(M1)}=24.2 eV {I15}, |G{-|g0(E2)}=0.32 eV {I12}, and |G=0.86 keV {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$(1975Ma21: with {+12}C(p,|g) data): |G{-|g}(E1) |< 2.82 eV {I30} and B(E1)W |< 03.69|*10{+-3} {I39}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$(1973Ad02): Combined their |G{-p0}/|G=0.236 {I12} value with |G{-p0}|G{-|g0}/|G=5.5 eV {I8} from (1968Di04) and obtained |G{-|g0}{+M1}=23.0 eV {I36} and |G{-|g0}=23.3 eV {I36}. 
$(1975Ma21: with {+12}C(p,|g) data |G{-p0}|G{-|g0}/|G=5.79 eV {I20} and the |G{-p0}/|G value from (1973Ad02)): |G{-|g}(M1)=24.2 eV {I15}, |G{-|g}(E2)=0.32 eV {I12} and B(M1)W=0.342 {I21} and B(E2)W=0.28 {I11}; I(E2/M1)=0.013 {I5} See discussion in (1975Ku21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
B(E1)(W.u.): calculated by M. J. Martin from branching in table 14.11. Not given by 1991Aj01 in table 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
B(M1)(W.u.): calculated by M. J. Martin from branching in table 14.11. Not given by 1991Aj01 in table 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
B(M1)(W.u.),B(E2)(W.u.): calculated by M. J. Martin from data given in table 15.5. No values are given in table 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+16}N Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Dec 1992 update) 
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$in agreement with the literature value. The peak is quite narrow and has the same width as the 2526 keV transition; however no precise information on the lifetime is extracted due to a high background and limited statistics. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$A discrepancy exists between the (1991Pr03) Table 1 and Table 3 |g-ray intensities for E{-x}=1734 keV; we use values from Table 1. This choice is necessary to reproduce their relative |b{+-} feedings to {+18}N*(1734,2614). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
B(M1)(W.u.): value in table 2 is too large since |G{-|g}(3311) should be 0.017 eV rather than 0.22 eV, based on branching in table 15.17 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
In addition to the present result for the branching ratios, an evaluation of past work is given yielding recommended branching ratios of Branching=1.2 {I2}, 2.5 {I1}, 45.2 {I7}, 1.2 {I1} and 49.9 {I7} for E{-|g}=1425, 2112, 3043, 3103 and 8284 keV, respectively. The work in (1966Ev01) is found to have outlying values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Doppler shifted peak of this transition was not resolvable from the double escape peak of Doppler-shifted 6175-keV |g-ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$The long half-life (T{-1/2}=2.25 ps) of 5241-keV state resulted in no observable Doppler shift of this |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$ 6533.9 {I21} (2004Uk01); |DE|g=2.1 keV deduced by compilers by adding 1.2 (statistical) and 1.7 (systematic) keV uncertainties on |g energy together in quadrature. 
RI$ 149|+18 counts from {+16}{-|L}O mass-gated |g spectrum in bound-state region (-21<-B{-|L}<8 MeV) (2005Ta19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$ 6560.3 {I20} (2004Uk01); |DE|g=2.0 keV deduced by compilers by adding 1.1 (statistical) and 1.7 (systematic) keV uncertainties on |g energy together in quadrature. 
RI$ 226|+30 counts from {+16}{-|L}O mass-gated |g spectrum in bound-state region (-21<-B{-|L}<8 MeV) (2005Ta19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Precisely reported |g-ray energies are 870.76 {I4} from {+16}O(n,|g):E=thermal (2016Fi04) and 870.725 {I20} from {+16}O(d,p|g) from (1980Wa24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$E{-|g}=2184.49 {I5} is reported in {+16}O(n,|g):E=thermal (2016Fi04) See also 2184.3 {I+3-2} keV (2020Zi03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(1983Ra29) measured |G{-|a}|G{-|g1}/|G{-total}=0.65 eV {I7}. Using |G{-|a}/|G{-total}=0.45 from (1968Ke02) they deduced |G{-|g1}=1.44 eV {I26} which corresponds to B(E1)=(2.4|+0.5)|*10{+-3} e{+2}fm{+2} (1983Ra29). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$(1983Ra29) measured |G{-|a}|G{-|g1}/|G{-total}=1.46 eV {I13}. Using |G{-|a0}=0.3 keV from (1973Ad02) and |G{-total}=2.4 keV {I3} from (1981Hi01) they deduced |G{-|g1}=11.6 eV {I18}; but this differs from the present analysis. See discussion in Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$The integrated E2 strength for 21725 and 22960 states was estimated to be about 1.5% of the E2 sum rule. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$The upper limit to the unobserved decay 3.06|)0 is 2%. 
$||M||{+2}(E1)=10{+-3} where ||M||{+2} is the ratio of the measured radiative width to the single particle estimate. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$The upper limit to the unobserved decay 3.85|)0.87 is 5%. 
$||M||{+2}(E1)|>10{+-3}, ||M||{+2}(M2)|>1.5. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$See E{-|g}(keV)=870.5 {I20} (1952Th24: The internal conversion coefficient is consistent with E2), 869 {I3} (1955Ma36), 870.81 {I22} (1966Wi01), 870.7 (2000El08,2006Sz07), 870.725 {I20} (1980Wa24). See also (1995Ro28,2016Cs02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$from (Go56). The absence of the direct ground state decay of the 3.07-MeV state is consistent with J=1/2 (Go56). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from (2021Ci02); see also E{-|g}=1375.0 keV {I5} (2019Zi02), 1375.5 keV {I2} (2020Ci02: private communication, June 2020). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$2370.6 keV {I+5-3} (2021Ci02); see also E{-|g}=2371.5 keV {I10} (2019Zi02), 2370.0 keV {I+5-30} (2020Ci03), 2370.6 keV {I3} (2020Ci02: private communication, June 2020 indicates that 2370.6 keV {I3} was deduced along with E{-|g}=2370.6 keV {I+5-3}, which was deduced using the |a(M) DSAM technique). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from (2020Ci02 and private communication, Aug. 2021); see also E{-|g}=1596 keV (2020Ci03). 
RI$weak (2020Ci02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from private communication with M. Ciemala, Aug. 2021; see also E{-|g}=3849 keV (2020Ci02, 2020Ci03, 2021Ci02). 
RI$weak (2020Ci02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from private communication with M. Ciemala, Aug. 2021; see also E{-|g}=4894 keV (2020Ci03). There is a hint for the decay from the 4990 keV neutron-unbound state (2020Ci03) as quoted in (2016Du02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from private communication with M. Ciemala, Aug. 2021; see also E{-|g}=2584 keV {I2} (2020Ci03). 
RI$from (2020Ci03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$From (2020Ci02) analysis. See also E{-|g}=2396 keV (2019Ci08). 
$(2020Ci02) finds a partial lifetime of 190{++102}{--40} fs, while {Iab initio} theory predicts a partial lifetime of 249 fs, |B(M1)=0.0166 |m{+2}{-N} and B(E2)=6.84|*10{+-6} {Ie}{+2}b{+2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$ taken from (1981Yo03). 
$B(E2: 2{++}{-2}|)2{++}{-1})=4 {I2} e{+2}fm{+4} (2020ZaAA). 
$B(M1: 2{++}{-2}|)2{++}{-1})=0.05 {I2} |m{-N}{+2} (2020ZaAA). 
$The authors of (2023Za06) note that the short lifetime of this state is incompatible with having a low B(E2) and B(M1) simultaneously for the 2{++}{-2}|)2{++}{-1} transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E2: 3{++}{-1}|)2{++}{-2})=0.7 {I2} e{+2}fm{+4} (2020ZaAA). 
$B(M1: 3{++}{-1}|)2{++}{-2})=0.19 {I4} |m{-N}{+2} (2020ZaAA). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$B(E2: 3{++}{-1}|)2{++}{-1})=0.32 {I7} e{+2}fm{+4} (2020ZaAA). 
$B(M1: 3{++}{-1}|)2{++}{-1})=0.016 {I4} |m{-N}{+2} (2020ZaAA). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$I|g(alt.)=6.8 {I8} from analysis of escape and Compton contributions associated with coincidence events. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$this |g is not clearly seen in authors' spectral Fig. 3c, but is consistent with its suppression in the weak coupling limit (2018Ya08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=895.2 {I3}(stat) {I5}(syst); |G(FWHM)=4.3 {I5}(stat) {I+1-2}(syst) (2018Ya08). 
$Possible placement of this |g ray between 1/2- and 3/2+ levels is rejected by 2018Ya08, as an expected stronger transition at 1.21 MeV from 1/2- to 1/2+ level is not seen 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Measured yield=19 {I8}(stat) {I+1-2}(syst) events 
$E|g=952.8 {I12}(stat) {I+5-6}(syst); |G(FWHM)=5.9 {I21}(stat) {I+2-1}(syst) (2018Ya08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Measured yield=25 {I8}(stat) {I+2-5}(syst) events 
$E|g=1265.6 {I12}(stat) {I+7-5}(syst); |G(FWHM)=8.1 {I30}(stat) {I+5-6}(syst) (2018Ya08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Postive A{-2} for |DJ=1 transition suggests significant M1+E2 admixture (compiler's note) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.27 {I+38-10} (2015Vo12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Large positive A{-2} is consistent with |DJ=0, (9/2-) to (9/2+) transition 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00022 {I+8-4} (2015Vo12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Large negative A{-2} is inconsistent with |DJ=2, E2 transition (compiler's note) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.3 {I+9-6} (2015Vo12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Listed in 1989Hu07 without placement and no coincidence with other |g rays. This |g ray is identified by 2005We06 as sum peak of 71.6|g and 637.4|g and simmulation accounts it's full intensity. Also reported in coincidence with 1862|g in 2005We06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$72.1|g intensity is lower than expectation (2007Le28), probably because of uncertain relative efficiency of the detector at low energy |g ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weak line from the single step fragmentation reaction in 2013Va06 (Acta Phys. Pol. B44, 553) (noted in 2014Va02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Peak energy determined at 3.8|s confidence level. Placement of 665|g from 2+ state is proposed by 2004El10 from shell model calculations. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$(2021As10): This |g ray could either be from the direct population of the 275-keV state, or by feeding the 275-keV state from the decay of higher-lying {+19}Ne states up to 10 MeV (see text). However, (2021As10) only presents a partial spectrum of {+19}Ne. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|G{-|g}=0.49 meV 7 deduced from previously measured relative ratios of the R -->5788 vs. R -->4248 transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$Expected transition from Adopted Levels, Gammas with 54 % {I5} of 5992|g intensity is inconsistent with intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Intensity increased by 8% on the basis of intensity balance de-exciting the capture state to the 4725-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of +0.18 {i3} (1968Ku05), +0.19 {i4} (1967Bu01), +0.13 {i3} (1972Ho52), and +0.16 {i3} (1976Br06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted Gammas. Other value: 1274.6 {I3} (1974Da02). 
RI$Relative intensity 99 {i10} has been reported with respect to 100 of 72|g in {+22}F from {+22}O |b{+-} decay (2005We06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Other values: 73 {I3} (1973Gu05). Relative intensity 78 {I8} has been reported with respect to 100 of 72|g in {+22}F from {+22}O |b{+-} decay (2005We06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 62 {I4} (1973Gu05). Relative intensity 63 {I8} has been reported with respect to 100 of 72|g in {+22}F from {+22}O |b{+-} decay (2005We06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From 1976Fi02. Other: +0.16 {I3} (1976Fi02), +0.19 {I4} (1967Bu01), +0.13 {I3} (1972Ho52 in (t,p|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 2000He14 
CC$|a(tot)=6.8|*10{+-4}, from experimental value of 1985HaZA. Interpolated value is 6.8|*10{+-6} from tables of 1976Ba63. Internal pair formation coefficient |a{-|p}=2.1|*10{+-5} {I3} (1979Sc31). |a=|a(tot)+|a{-|p}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1822.25~{I21} ({+23}F |b{+-} decay), 1822.19~{I6} (n,|g), and 1822.8~{I3} (d,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 2203.51~{I7} (2009BeZQ - 2203.62~{I7}) and 2203.58~{I6} (1986Pr05). Uncertainty lowest input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 3220.15~{I12} (2009BeZQ - 3220.39~{I12}) and 3220.42~{I16} (1986Pr05). Uncertainty lowest input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 2819.08~{I12} (2009BeZQ - 2819.27~{I12}) and 2819.22~{I16} (1986Pr05). Uncertainty lowest input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 1979.83~{I6} (2009BeZQ - 1979.92~{I6}) and 1979.89~{I6} (1986Pr05). Uncertainty lowest input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted ave. of 4182.91~{I18} (2009BeZQ - 4183.32~{I18}) and 4183.20~{I25} (1986Pr05). Uncertainty lowest input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Others: 1319 keV {i22} (({+28}Ne,{+28}Ne'|g)-2006Do09) and 1320 keV {i20} (Coulomb excitation-1999Pr09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 936 {I28} (2005Be60). Placement of this |g ray is based on coincidence (better statistics) with 1706|g forming a single cascade in 2007RoZY. In contrary, the 936 keV |g ray (i.e. 894 keV |g ray in this dataset) is shown to feed the 2+ state at 1293 keV (1304 keV here), based on |g|g coin of the 1293|g with both the 936|g and 1707|g (poor statistics) in 2005Be60. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E Weighted average of 1306 keV {i4}, 1304 keV {i5} (1p, 2p knockout-2007RoZY), and 1293 keV {i8} (2005Be60). Others: 1320 keV {i25} (2000Be44), and 1310 keV (2006FaZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1707 keV {i7}, 1704 keV {i8} (1p, 2p knockout - 2007RoZY), and 1707 keV {i15} (2005Be60). Others: 1750 keV {i50} (2000Be44) and 1720 keV (2006FaZX). 
RI$Weighted average of I|g=23 {I3}, 55 {I10} (1p, 2p knockout-2007RoZY), and 45 {I10} (2005Be60). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 891 keV {i5}, 895 keV {i4} (1p, 2p knockout-2007RoZY) - uncertainty from experiment. Others: 936 keV {i28} (2005Be60), 900 keV (2006FaZX). In 2007RoZY, placement of this |g ray is based on coincidence (better statistics) with 1706|g forming a single cascade. In contrary, the 936 keV |g ray (i.e. 894 keV |g ray in this dataset) is shown to feed the 2+ state at 1293 keV (1304 keV here), based on |g|g coin of the 1293|g with both the 936|g and 1707|g (poor statistics) in 2005Be60. 
RI$using the Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LWM) averaging method (1985ZiZY) of data: I|g=10 {I2}, 23 {I6} (1p, 2p knock out - 2007RoZY), and 35 {I10} (2005Be60). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2016Ko05 note 1536|g as a new transition. 
RI$Counts in coincidence photopeak supported the cascade with 1293|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Observed in |g-|g coin. measurement. 2023Wa18 measured I{-1732}=I{-951} therefore the placement of 1732|g is based on the literature. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The 931|g feeds g.s. and is placed from 931-keV level, based on the fact that the S(n)({+29}Ne)=960 {I140} and it is unlikely that the 931|g would feed the 622-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The 931|g feeds g.s. and is placed from 931-keV level, based on the fact that the S(n)({+29}Ne)=960 {I140}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 800 {I7} (2014Mi09), 791 keV {I26} (2003Ya05), 801 {I7} (2009Do10), 799 {I5} (2016Do03 - C target), 801 {I6} (2016Do03 - Pb target) - all from ({+30}Ne,{+30}Ne'|g), and 792 {I4} ({+32}Mg,2p|g) (2010Fa04). 
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by evaluators from B(E2)|^=0.0277 {I79} (2016Do03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 800 {I7} (2014Mi09), 791 keV {I26} (2003Ya05), 801 {I7} (2009Do10), 799 {I5} (2016Do03 - C target), and 801 {I6} (2016Do03 - Pb target). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of +3.1 {I3} (1968Wa04), +3.7 {I4} (1976Ma23), +3.2 {I7} (1970Ba47), and +2.6 {I5} (1967Po14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of +2.00 {I15} (1968Wa04), +2.4 {I3} (1976Ma23) and +2.5 {I5} (1977Ha11): Other: +1.18 {I15} (1967Po14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 28 {I3} (1973Ha55) and 32 {I4} (1975Sp02) 
MR$-0.05 {I6} in 1976Ma23, 0.00 {I10} in 1968Pa11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E,MR$E|g from 1975Sp02; A{-2}=+0.65 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.92 {I21} (1975Sp02), mixing ratio from +5.7 {I+20-38} (1977Ha11); Other values: +3.7 {I+12-34} (1975Sp02), <+18 or >-15 (1976Ma23). 
RI$Weighted average of 54 {I15} (1969Wa17) and 33 {I9} (1973Fr18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From the weighted mean of 0.278 {I69}, 0.280 {I208} and 0.256 {I43} for HPGe detectors 1 and 2 at E{-p}=908 keV and HPGe detector 1 at E{-p}= 1113 keV, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From the weighted mean of 99.291 {I86}, 99.202 {I259} and 99.293 {I57} for HPGe detectors 1 and 2 at E{-p}=908 keV and HPGe detector 1 at E{-p}= 1113 keV, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$observed in 2017Tr04. Partial width |G{-|g}=2.69|*10{+-4} eV {I88} deduced using I|g and T{-1/2} in 2017Tr04. 
RI$From the weighted mean of 0.431 {I52}, 0.519 {I156} and 0.450 {I38} for HPGe detectors 1 and 2 at E{-p}=908 keV and HPGe detector 1 at E{-p}= 1113 keV, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$Unweighted average of 439.80~{I15} ({+12}C,p|g) and 441.1~{I4} (p,p'|g)). 
MR$Weighted average of +0.08~{I2} (1966Po06 - (p,|a|g)), +0.06~{I4} (1968So07 - (p,p'|g)), +0.08~{I3} (1970Po08 - (t,|a|g)), +0.05~{I3} (1971Da14 - (t,|a|g)), 0.09~{I1} (1972Li02 - (p,|a|g)), 0.045~{I15} (1960Mi05 - (p,p'|g)), 0.09~{I4} (1962Br21 - (p,|g)), and 0.060~{I5} (1977Sc36). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of +0.20~{I2} (1966Po06 - (p,|a|g)), +0.24~{I7} (1968So07 - (p,p'|g)), +0.18~{I4} (1970Po08 - (t,|a|g)), +0.16~{I2} (1971Da14 - (t,|a|g)), +0.22~{I2} (1972Li02 - (p,|a|g)), and +0.18~{I2} (1970Ma15 - (p,p'|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of -0.09~{I9} (1970Ma15 - (p,p'|g)), -0.07~{I21} (1970Po08 - (t,|a|g)), -0.05~{I7} (1971Da14 - (t,|a|g)), 0.05~{I5} (1972Li02 - (p,|a|g)), and 0.15~{I5} (1971Ra13 - (|g,|g'). 
RI$Other values: 77.3~{I23} ({+12}C,p|g), 82~{I4} (p,|a|g), 64~{I3} (p,p'|g). Unweighted average of all available data: 72.8~{I25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Unweighted average of data from -0.27~{I5} (p,|a|g), -0.10~{I7} (p,|g), and -0.16~{I7} and -0.08~{I4} in (t,|a),(t,|a|g). These values are for spin 5/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$Weighted average of -0.05~{I5} (p,|a|g), -0.20~{I9} (p,|g), and +0.04~{I4} (t,|a),(t,|a|g). Note other possible values in later two data sets for spin 3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q in ({+12}C,p|g). RUL yields to high B(E2)(W.u.) value for M1+E2 with |d=+1.05~{I70} ({+12}C,p|g) and limits the |d<0.14. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$Q in ({+12}C,p|g) (2013Je04). However, D+Q earlier literature with |d=+1.6~{I6} (p,|a|g) (1972Li02) and +1.05~{I70} ({+12}C,p|g) (1977Ke05) for 9/2+; |d=-0.15~{I14} (p,|a|g) (1972Li02) and -0.03~{I15} ({+12}C,p|g) (1977Ke05) for 13/2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other value: 5990 ({+12}C,p|g), yields a level energy of 8972.9 {I11} in least-squares fit, if |DE=1 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Other value: 5292 ({+12}C,p|g) (uncertainty of 1~keV is an estimate - might be higher) yields level energy of 9207.1 keV, however authors (2013Je04) attribution of 5292|g from 9211-keV level indicate that 9207 and 9211~keV levels are same. 
M$From ({+12}C,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g-ray branch to 2076.2-keV level reported in 2017Ke01 (p,|g), adopted spin-parity 7/2+ for 2076.2 keV level implies an (M2) transition. Placement should be considered with caution. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$Consideration of 8957~{I1} from ({+12}C,p|g) in least squares fit yields level energy of 9399.1~{I11}, significantly different than literature values. Evaluators adopted level energy from (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement from (p,|g) should be considered with caution. If J{+|p}=1/2-, would be an [M2] transition to 5/2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 8.6 {I3} (1968Go05), 8.1 {I4} (1974Ma41), 7.79 {I15} (1977Az01), and 7.805 {I81} (2017Ma18). Other values: 9.1 {I5} (1960Ta14), 9.1 {I4} (1974Al03) - discrepant data omitted in the wt. average. 6 {I3} (for rough check in 1971De05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$DCO value more consistent with Q, whereas levels scheme indicates D as |DJ=0. M1+E2 in 2013Je04. M1 in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 3646 (1979Lu02) 
RI$Branching 50~{I1} (2013Je04), 28~{I1} (1979Lu02) relative to I|g(2506|g) 
$|DJ=0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$Other: 4273 (1979Lu02) 
RI$Branching 80~{I2} (2013Je04), 20~{I5} (1979Lu02) relative to I|g(2506|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$13/2+ listed as initial level in Table I of 2013Je04 seems a misprint |DJ=0 transition for J|p(8319)=9/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$Initial level is listed as 8944 in table I of 2013Je04, it should be 8945 as for 2592|g 
E$6242 listed in figure 11 of 2013Je04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.22 {I5} 
MR$or +2.2 {I4} (1989Ba42). -0.10 {I7} value assumed to be associated with spin 5/2 and the other for 3/2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.35 {I7}. A{-4}=-0.23 {I6} (1989Ba42) gives M1+E2, |d=-0.13 {I14}. Mult Q from decay to 3/2- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$Missing gamma deexcitation intensity I|g=25 from 6120 level 
M$A{-2}=0.09 {I9} (1989Ba42) 
MR$or +3.1 {I10} (1989Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 3.3 {I7}: unweighted ave. of 4.7 {I9} (2017Ke01), 2.7 {I9} [2018Fe04 - 2.5 {I8}], 2.4 {I2} [2016De34 - 2.7 {I2}]; |* 1.03 for |SI|g=100 from the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted ave. of 3.1 {I6} (2017Ke01), 1.7 {I5} (2018Fe04 - 1.6 {I5}), 1.0 {I3} (2016De34 - 1.1 {I3}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 2.5 {I4}: Wt. ave. of 2.6 {I5} [2018Fe04 - 2.4 {I5}] and 2.2 {I8} (2017Ke01); |* 1.03 for |SI|g=100 from the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 3.6 {I4}: weighted ave. of 5.0 {I8} (2017Ke01), 3.6 {I8} [2018Fe04 - 3.3 {I7}], 3.3 {I4} [2016De34 - 3.7 {I5}]; |* 1.03 for |SI|g=100 from the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 41.5 {I11}: weighted ave. of 39.8 {I13} (2017Ke01), and 42.2 {I8} [2016De34 - 47.9 {I9}]; |* 1.03 for |SI|g=100 from the level. Other: 53 {I6} (2018Fe04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From 37.7 {I7}: Weighted ave. of 37.7 {I15} (2017Ke01), 37.7 {I65} [2018Fe04 - 35 {I6}], 37.7 {I8} [2016De34 - 42.8 {I9}]. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$A comparable |g ray placed from 9212.9-keV in Adopted Levels - see footnote for 9212.9-keV level. 
RI$Other: 22.4~{I10} (2015De33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=-0.85 {I10}, A{-4}=0.02 {I14} (1979Sm02) 
MR$Wt. av. of -0.27~{I5} (1979Sm02) and -0.30~{I4} (2009Us01). Other possible values: -1.1~{I2} (1979Sm02), -1.5~{I2} (2009Us01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Wt. ave. of 94~{I2} (1970Po08) and 92~{I2} (1971Da14) 
MR$Wt. ave. of +0.18~{I4} (1970Po08) and +0.16~{I2} (1971Da14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Wt. ave. of 59~{I2} (1970Po08) and 58~{I2} (1971Da14) 
MR$Other value +0.30~{I6} or +3.5~{I8} (1971Da14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I16} (1971Da14). 
RI$Wt. ave. of 23~{I5} (1970Po08) and 30~{I2} (1971Da14) 
MR$Other value +0.03~{I8} for 5/2 or <-8 for 3/2 (1971Da14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Wt. ave. of 63~{I7} (1970Po08) and 57~{I2} (1971Da14) 
MR$Average of -0.16~{I7} (1970Po08) and -0.08~{I4} for 5/2 (1971Da14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$From 1971Da14 for 5/2, or -3.0~{I8} for 3/2 
RI$Unweighted ave. of 14~{I4} (1970Po08) and 13~{I1} (1971Da14) to satisfy |9=100 from this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
RI$Wt. ave. of 63 {I2} (1972Li02) and 68 {I2} (1966Po06) 
MR$Wt. ave. of -0.02 {I13} (1972Li02) and -0.05 {I7} (1966Po06) for 9/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 60 {I5} (1966Po06) 
MR$Others: +0.11 {I5} or +2.7 {I4} for 3/2 and +0.54 {I11} for (5/2) (1966Po06). The other higher value of -4.1 {I7} in 1972Li02 can be rejected on the basis of unlikely high quadrupole transition strength. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.01 {I16} or +1.2 {I4} for 7/2, and -0.06 {I3} for 5/2 (1972Li02). Larger value +1.2 {I4} rejected by the evaluators for RUL using data in the adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$From a ratio of 0.954 {I4} based on measured cross sections at 58.5 and 41.5~MeV and virtual photon theory (1965Ba28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q), (M1+E2) is listed based on level scheme for transition strength calculation. 
MR$+0.08 {I3} or -6.3 {I+12-33} (1971Bu21) for 3 to 2+ transition - {+26}Mg(d,|a|g),(pol d,|a). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q), (M1+E2) is listed based on level scheme for transition strength calculation. 
MR$+0.00 {I4} or -7.1 {I+15-25} (1971Bu21) for 3 to 4+ transition - {+26}Mg(d,|a|g),(pol d,|a). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI Others: 39.5 {I23} (d,p|g) and 24 {I6} (d,|a|g). Weighted average of all gives the same value with higher uncertainty. In (n,|g) E=10-30 keV only two depopulating gammas and yield 100 {I35}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI Others: 65.1 {I23} (d,p|g), 73 {I6} (d,|a|g), and 26 {I13} if Ig(1282.8)=37.5 instead of 100 in (n,|g) E=10-30 keV. The unweighted yields 55 {I10}. Discrepant data set. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 56.9 {I23} from (n,|g) E=thermal, 56.3 {I31} from (d,p|g), and 45 {I4} from (d,|a|g) 
MR$-0.07 {I2} or -5.4 {I4} (1971Bu21) for 3+ to 4+ transition - {+26}Mg(d,|a|g),(pol d,|a). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 29 {I4} from (d,p|g) and 23 {I9} if I|g(1218)=100 from (d,|a|g). Other: 23 {I8} in (n,|g) E=thermal from literature (ealier evaluation), not considered. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 100 {I15} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 100 {I4} from (d,p|g). Other: 91 {I17} in (d,|a|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 9 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal and 5.7 {I19} from (d,p|g). Other: 5.5 {I36} if I|g(1564)=100 (actually <100) in (d,|a|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 5.1 {I16} from (n,|g) E=thermal and 3.8 {I19} from (d,p|g). Other: 9.1 {I55} if I|g(1564)=100 (actually <100) in (d,|a|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 23.7 {I24} from (n,|g) E=thermal and 23 {I4} from (d,p|g). Other: 27 {I9} if I|g(1564)=100 (actually <100) (d,|a|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Placement in 2014Fi01 (n,|g) based on the energy sum and consistency with the level scheme, however, did not place the other 1872|g (d,p),(d,p|g) or 1875|g (d,|a|g),(pol d,|a) from this level. A comparable 1875.6|g placed from 6072.76 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of 2014Fi01, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2004To03 
RI$from 2014Fi01, divided intensity in 2014Fi01 for multiple placement of 783.14 keV {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g in 2014Fi01 is from earlier evaluation (2007Fi14) appears to be smaller by an order. Evaluators list as 0.06 {I2} instead of 0.006 {I2} (based on (0.0032 {I10})/5.4). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02. 1983Hu11 also placed the |g from capture state, not by 2004To03 and 2014Fi01. Evaluators place from this level only. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1131.35 {I12} (2014Fi01) and 1131.7 {I3} (2004To03). 2004To03 noted the transition can also be placed from 5479 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
E$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11 and 2004To03 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 
RI$from 2014Fi01, divided intensity for multiple placement (3092.64|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Other: 2019.74 {I3} (2014Fi01). 
RI$from 2014Fi01. Divided intensity for multiply placed 2019.74|g in 2014Fi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2004To03. A comparable 2591.71|g placed from 6247 level in 1983Hu11 and 1983Ti02. 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2004To03. Other: 3369.84 {I6} (2014Fi01). 
RI$from 2014Fi01, intensity divided for multiple placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11,2004To03 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
RI$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 2004To03,1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
RI$weighted average of 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03. A comparable E|g 1928.28 {I4} placed from capture state in 1983Ti02 and 1984Ti01. Evaluators only keep this placement, assuming it is the same E|g. 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
RI$from 2014Fi01, divided intensity for multiple placement of 1005.914|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Fi01. 2004To03 noted the transition can also be placed from 6072.762 (6072 in 2004To03) level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 
RI$from 2004To03. Doublet and reported divided intensity. Consistent with the datum in 2014Fi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$from 2014Fi01. Divided intensity for multiple placement of 4187.39|g in 2014Fi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 2004To03,1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01,2004To03,1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2004To03. Other: 5059.75 {I20} (2014Fi01) 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1983Hu11. Other: 3770.51 {I17} (2014Fi01) 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2004To03. A comparable E|g 4981.79 {I13} placed from capture state only in 1983Hu11. Evaluators only keep this placement, assuming it is the same E|g. 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1983Hu11. A comparable 5246.2|g reported in 1983Ti02 and placed from 5247 keV level to feed the g.s. Other comparable depopulating E|g 1832.19, 2219.70, 4462.84 also reported - but unplaced. Evaluators consider the reported level at 5247 is as spurious and do not list. 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1983Ti02. Placement from 5953 in 1983Ti02 only. E|g not reported by others. Fits poorly, an uncertainty of 0.12 was used for least-square fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1983Ti02, 2014Fi01 quote the E|g=2376.3 {I13}, most likely a calculated value in 2007Fi14 (evaluation). Appears to be the same E|g=2380.4 {I14} in ({+3}He,p|g). Placement in 1983Ti02 from 4939 keV level, however, in 1984Ti01 the proposed J|p=1- (4939) makes it a 1- to 4+ transition. Evaluators accept the placement of ({+3}He,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Fi01. Fits poorly, an uncertainty of 0.18 was used for least-square fit. For I|g intensity divided for multiple placement of 4187.39|g (4187.35|g in this dataset). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 
RI$unweighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02. A comparable 2592.10|g placed from 3933 keV level in 2004To03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1983Ti02. Others: 4905.517 {I13} (2014Fi01), 4909.7? {I12} (1983Hu11). This placement adopted as proposed in 2014Fi01 and 1983Ti02. A comparable 4904.3|g is placed in 2004To03 from 6251 level. 
RI$from unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Fi01. 1983Hu11 place a comparable 2661.9|g from 4622 feeding the level at 1961. The latter level has not been adopted. See general comments for levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Fi01. 1983Hu11 placed a comparable 552.44|g from 2531 keV level. Feeding level at 1961 has not been adopted. See general comments for level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2014Fi01, divided intensity for multiple placement. 2004To03 place only from 4621 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2004To03. 1983Hu11 placed a comparable 1504.90|g from from 1977, not reported by others. 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 2004To03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of data from 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$from 2014Fi01. Divided intensity for multiply placed 2019.74|g in 2014Fi01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2014Fi01. Others report a doublet about this E|g and placed from the capture state. The one from 2014Fi01 is kept by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of data from 1983Hu11, 1983Ti02 
RI$weighted average of data from 2014Fi01, 1983Hu11, 2004To03, 1983Ti02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$feeding state is not assigned properly (2001Ho12); the evaluators assume that the transition feeds 1341 keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 2808.45|g has been placed from 3371.8 keV level in adopted dataset based on placements in (n,|g) E=thermal, (d,p),(d,p|g), and (a,|a|g),(pol d,|a). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$A comparable 4908.6|g has been placed from 6251.1 keV level in adopted dataset based on placement in (n,|g) E=thermal. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$feeding state is not assigned properly (2001Ho12); the evaluators assume that the transition feeds 1345 keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.02 {I2} or -4.7 {I4} (1971Bu21) for 3+ to 2+ transition, -0.76 {I+6-12} for 2+ to 2+ transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators from I(|g+ce) and |a=0.128 {I20} (from BrIcc code) 
TI$2007Su05 quote intensity from 2004We11. Evaluators note that 2004We11 give I(|g+ce)(82.5|g)=100 but |b feeding=92 {i5} for 82.5-keV level. The latter value implies I(|g+ce)(82.5|g)=95, which has been used by 2007Su05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=?;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted Gammas 
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by 2015Si01 from known half-life of 82.4 level and theoretical conversion coefficient for 82.5|g from BrIcc code. Shell-model predictions (2015Si01) for corresponding B(E2)(W.u.) values are 8.66 (USD), 8.39 (USDA) and 6.88 (USDB) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Shell-model predictions for corresponding B(M1)(W.u.) in 2015Si01: 0.0002 (USD), 0.011 (USDA) and 0.023 (USDB) 
$Shell-model predictions for corresponding B(E2)(W.u.) in 2015Si01: 3.09 (USD); 1.23 (USDA); 1.84 (USDB) 
RI$corrected number of counts reported as 3279 {I131} in 2015Si01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Shell-model predictions for corresponding B(M1)(W.u.) in 2015Si01: 0.14 (USD), 0.04 (USDA) and 0.07 (USDB) 
$Shell-model predictions for corresponding B(E2)(W.u.) in 2015Si01: 6.25 (USD), 10.06 (USDA) and 10.04 (USDB) 
RI$corrected number of counts reported as 4046 {I162} in 2015Si01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$Shell-model predictions for corresponding B(M1)(W.u.) in 2015Si01: 0.34 (USD), 0.34 (USDA) and 0.32 (USDB) 
$Shell-model predictions for corresponding B(E2)(W.u.) in 2015Si01: 11.27 (USD), 7.91 (USDA) and 7.89 (USDB) 
RI$corrected number of counts reported as 1374 {I137} in 2015Si01. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1999Re16. Other: 863 keV (2006Tr02). The |g ray is placed from a 2927 keV level (J|p=1+) in 1999Re16. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1999Re16. The |g ray is placed from a 2063 keV level (J|p=1+) in 1999Re16. Other: 2063 keV (2006Tr02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,M$from 2009Hu03 
$E2 matrix element (5/2+ to 3/2+)=0.237 eb 21, corresponds to B(E2)(W.u.)=17.7 {I32} (2009Hu03). The statistical uncertainty arising from the measured peak areas, |?16%, dominates the quoted 1-|s error. Other contributions include uncertainties in the beam composition and target purity, |?3% and <0.1% respectively, along with |?6% systematic uncertainty in the magnitudes (and signs) of the matrix elements corresponding to couplings with higher-lying states in {+110}Pd (and {+29}Na), in addition to the |?2% uncertainty on the relative |g-ray efficiency measurements; all of which are much less significant. The value for the matrix element is consistent with that of 0.232 predicted by shell-model. Q=0.524 eb 46 is deduced from the transition matrix element and rotational model (assuming prolate deformation) in agreement with shell-model prediction of 0.513 eb 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$deduced in 2014Se02 to correspond to B(M1) limit deduced from GOSIA analysis for 5/2+ |) 3/2+ transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$360|g from a neutron knock-out channel: {+1}H({+31}Na,{+30}Na) (2006El03). Other: 338.7 {I7} (2006FuZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(M1) was deduced from GOSIA analysis assuming a moderate B(E2)=0.0080 for (4+) to (3+) transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$listed in 2015Pe09 from 2007Tr08. The measured value is 148 keV in 2015Pe09. The E|g shift is attributed to the longer mean lifetime (|t|?500 ps) of this state by the authors of 2015Pe09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 370 {i12} (2006El03), 376 {I4} (2010Do05) and 350 {i20} (2001Pr01), from {+1}H({+31}Na,{+31}Na'|g), {+12}C({+32}Na,{+31}Na|g) and {+197}Au({+31}Na,{+31}Na'|g), respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$New |g ray in 2006FuZX is stated by authors as preliminary. However, this transition is confirmed as 787 {I8} in later work by 2010Do05, and a level at 1163 keV was proposed earlier by 2002Pr12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 429 {I5} from ({+38}Si,{+33}Na|g) and 425 {I5} from ({+36}Mg,{+33}Na|g). Other: 467 {I13} from ({+34}Na,{+33}Na|g) seems discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$other: 690 {I13} from ({+36}Mg,{+33}Na|g) is in agreement with the adopted values, but less precise. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From ({+21}Na,|g). Evaluator lists this |g-ray as doubtful based on the existence of the level at 6242.7 keV {i11}. Please see comments for the depopulating level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=0.33 {I10}, A{-4}=0.13 {I12} (2005Se02) 
E$Other: 1982.8 keV {i10} (1282.8 in 2007Je03, probably a typo) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$Based on the RUL(M2)=3 (upperlimit). Other: |d>0.4 in ({+3}He,|a|g), the lowerlimit appears to be a typo. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$From ({+3}He,|a|g) 
MR$-4.33~{I9} in 1970Ha02 note that large value implies E2(+M1) and consequently positive parity for the depopulating state. That would be inconsistent with negative parity from L=3 (p,t). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Other: 450.7 (2011Sa15) 
RI$From 2011Sa15. Absolute intensity=43.3% {I10} quoted in 2011Sa15 appears to be using data from Ref. 25 (Ph.D. dissertation by Y. Zhai at Texas A and M (2007)). The procedure to deduce the value was not available. In an e-mail reply, R. E. Tribble mentioned to B. Singh (dated March 13, 2019) that identification of some of the gamma lines in the thesis was uncertain and not included in the publication. It is not clear which |g-ray intensity was considered to deduce the 43.3% {I10} value. The datum should be considered with caution. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Reported in 2004Je02. Missing in the full version 2013Je04. First author expressed it might be a mistake, but did not confirm, while communicated by the reviewer of this manuscript B. Singh (dated: March 14, 2019). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of -0.07~{I5} (1970Ha02), -0.04~{I4} (1968Bl02), -0.06~{I2} (1967Da09), -0.075~{I24} (1967Du04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 85~{I3} (1970Ha02), 81~{I5} (1968Bl02), and 84~{I3} (1967Da09) 
MR$Weighted average of -0.18~{I4} (1970Ha02), -0.08~{I7} (1968Bl02), -0.23~{I3} (1967Da09), and -0.182~{I25} (1967Du04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 15~{I3} (1970Ha02), 19~{I5} (1968Bl02), and 16~{I3} (1967Da09) 
MR$Wt. ave. of +0.06~{I5} (1967Da09) and -0.14~{I25} (1970Ha02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Wt. ave. of 71~{I4} (1970Ha02), 68~{I3} (1967Da09), 67~{I5} (1968Bl02). 
MR$0.08~{I1} or -3.34~{I17} for spin 3/2 (1967Da09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Wt. ave. of 29~{I4} (1970Ha02), 32~{I3} (1967Da09), and 33~{I5} (1968Bl02) 
MR$0.19~{I3} or +15.5~{I73} for spin 3/2 (1967Da09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 6~{I5} (1970Ha02) and 8~{I3} (1968Bl02) 
MR$+0.08~{I20} or -2.15~{I21} (1970Ha02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 86~{I5} (1970Ha02) and 85~{I5} (1968Bl02) 
MR$Weighted average of +0.00~{I14} (1970Ha02), +0.07~{I7} (1968Bl02), and +0.011~{I37} (1967Du04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-4.33 {I9} in 1970Ha02 implies E2+M1 and consequently positive parity for the depopulating level. It is inconsistent with the adopted negative parity in Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 2754.007 {I11} from {+24}Na |b{+-} decay (14.956 h), 2754.030 {I14} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s). Other: 2751.8 {I15} ({+3}He,d|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$From {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s). Others: 2871.0 {I10} ({+24}Na |b{+-} decay (14.956 h)) and 2869.3 {I4} ({+24}Al |e decay (130.7 ms)). 
RI$weighted average of 30 {I5} from {+24}Na |b{+-} decay (14.956 h), 30.5 {I11} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s), 3E1 {I3} from {+24}Al |e decay (130.7 ms), 33 {I3} from {+25}Si |b{++}p decay, 24 {I6} from ({+12}C,|g), 30 {I3} from (|a,|g), and 26.7 {I6} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$From 1960Ba19 (pol p,p'|g) and RUL - see (p,p'),(pol p,p'). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 3866.14 {I10} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s), and 3867.2 {I14} from ({+3}He,d|g). 
M,MR$From (pol p,p'|g) in 1973Gl01 and RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 11.70 {I29} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s), 7.5 {I32} from (|a,|g), and 10.5 {I5} from (p,|g). Other: 15 {I4} ({+28}Si,X|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E Other: 4636.4 {I16} ({+3}He,d|g). 
RI$Weighted average of 100.0 {I32} from (|a,|g) and 100.0 {I5} from (p,|g). Other: 100 {I7} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s). 
Branching to g.s. could, in principle, be deduced from B(E4) ((e,e'), 1978Za07) and level lifetime. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 25 {I13} from (|a,|g), 21.1 {I9} from (p,|g), and 20 {I3} {+24}Mg(pol p,p'|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. 
M,CC$ From pair-conversion electron intensity measurements (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). |a - estimated by the evaluators using q{-|p}{+2}(E0/E2)=5.8 {I8} (2020Do10) and |a(5063|g - E2)=0.00151. 
$q{-|p}{+2}(E0/E2)=5.8 {I8} - the ratio of the pair-conversion electron intensity (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). 
$X(E0/E2)=27 {I4} - absolute transition rate B(E0)/B(E2) (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.380 {I70} - E0 transition strength (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 7.4 {I19} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s), 9 {I4} from (|a,|g), and 6.9 {I14} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 41.5 {I28} from {+24}Al |e decay (2.053 s), 41.4 {I86} from (|a,|g), and 31.9 {I28} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From ({+12}C,|g) 
RI$Weighted average of 18 {I6} from (|a,|g), and 28.2 {I26} from (p,|g). Other: 60 {I10} from ({+12}C,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. Tentatively placed in 2001Wi18 with a measured energy 5927 keV {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$d|s(90|')/d|W=39.3 mb/sr {I78} (1965Ma40) for E=3.0 MeV. |s(tot)=592 mb {I118}, E=3.0 MeV; d|s(90|')/d|W=38 mb/sr {I7} and |s(tot)=568 mb {I113}, E=3.5 MeV; d|s(90|')/d|W=36 mb/sr {I7} and |s(tot)=546 mb {I109}, E=4.0 MeV; d|s(90|')/d|W=37 mb/sr {I7} and |s(tot)=559 mb {I112}, E=4.5 MeV (1965Ma40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995HeZZ 
RI$From 1985LoZT, in their Ref. [4], p. 404. 
M$From |g|g(|q), internal pair conversion coefficient 6|*10{+-5} {I1} (1952Bl53) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1995HeZZ 
RI$unweighted average of P|g(2754.0)=0.99876 {I8} [from 1985LoZT, in their Ref. [4], p. 404] and 0.99857 {I5} [using the data in Ref. [3], p. 105 of 1985LoZT: P|g(1368.7): P|g(2754.0)=1: 0.998635 {I5} and adopted P|g(1368.7)=0.99994 {I2}). 
M$From |g|g(|q), internal pair conversion coefficient 7.1|*10{+-4} {I2} (1952Bl53) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Other values: <0.0033 (1970Le12), 0.008 {I3} (1962Mo09), 0.00085 {I39} (2003Ep02) and 0.0015 {I5} (1960Ar10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted Gammas 
RI$unweighted average of 0.061 {I5} (1972Ra21), 0.0489 {I25} (1970Le12) 0.075 {I20} (1962Mo09), 0.063 {I6} (1968Va06), 0.067 {I2} (2003Ep02), and 0.09 {I2} (1960Ar10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1368.633 {I6} (1981Wa07) 
RI$Weighted average of 96.0 {I10} (1979Sh11 - scaled), 96.0 {I25} (1979Ho08), and 96.4 {I5} (1972De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.097 {I28} (1981Wa07), 1.6 {I3} (1979Sh11 - scaled), and 1.4 {I4} (1972De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 14.2 {I9} (1981Wa07), 12.7 {I6} (1979Sh11 - scaled), and 15.0 {I15} (1972De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 43.0 {I13} (1981Wa07), 47.5 {I40} (1979Sh11 - scaled), and 41 {I4} (1972De28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.34 {I10} (1981Wa07), 1.0 {I2} (1979Sh11 - scaled), and 1.4 {I2} (1972De28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: 9440 {I10} in parentheses - probably to indicate uncertain (1972De28) and 0.10 {I5}, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$Unweighted average of 97.0 {I4} (1990En02), 98.2 {I2} (1989Ke04), 99.0 {I5} (1972Me09) 
M$Based on |d 
MR$+5.1 {I+12-8} and +0.47 {I4} (1973Le15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 3.0 {I4} (1990En02), 1.8 {I2} (1989Ke04), 1.0 {I5} (1972Me09). 
M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. Other: >-19 and +0.21 {I2} (1973Le15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI From I|g(4238)/I|g(2870)=3.44 {I50} (1962Co13) 
M,MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1960Ba19. Other: |d=50 {I33} (1977Ki02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M,MR$From adopted gammas, mixing ratio from 1/|d=0.06, based on |g(|q) measurements, in 1973Gl01. Uncertainty was estimated by the evaluators from the presented data in Fig. 3 (1973Gl01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. 
M,CC$ From pair-conversion electron intensity measurements (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). |a - estimated by the evaluators using q{-|p}{+2}(E0/E2)=5.8 {I8} (2020Do10) and |a(5063|g - E2)=0.00151. 
$q{-|p}{+2}(E0/E2)=5.8 {I8} - the ratio of the pair-conversion electron intensity (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). 
$X(E0/E2)=27 {I4} - absolute transition rate B(E0)/B(E2) (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). 
$|r{+2}(E0)=0.380 {I70} - monopole transition strength (2020Do10 - (p,p'|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$Measured values: +0.34 {I3} (for J|p=7/2+; based on +0.34 {I3} (1974Ro10) and +0.32 {I8} (1975Bu14)); -0.15 {I2} (for J|p=11/2+; based on -0.13 {I4} (1974Ro10) and -0.16 {I3} (1975Bu14)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$From 1963Br15 - (p,p'|g). Other values: -0.16 {I4} (1975Wa10 - (|a,|a'|g)), -0.11 {I6} (1977Ki02 - (p,p'|g)), -0.09 {I5} (1969Ca18 - (|a,|a')). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$More precise 409.22|g {i20} in {+26}Na |b{+-} decay (2005Gr07) yield poor fit. Branching from {+26}Na |b{+-} decay (2005Gr07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of data from (n,|g) and {+26}Na |b{+-} decay (2005Gr07) 
RI$Other: 59 {I6} (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1984Gu19 
RI$Deduced by evaluators from I|g=0.150 {i45} relative to I|g=100 for 984.66|g and corresponding absolute I|g=87.4 {i6}% in {+27}Mg (2011Ba29 - in ENSDF). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R(|q)=1.24 {I1}, pol=-0.15 {I4}, A{-2}=+0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} 
MR$Rose-Brink convention used in 2014Bh03. Sign reversed to Krane-Steffen convention for ENSDF policy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R=0.64 {I18} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(M1)=4.4|*10{+-2} {I14} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.29 keV {I9} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R=0.49 {I7} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(E1)=12.5|*10{+-6} {I22} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.94 keV {I16} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R=0.8 {I3} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(E1)=1.7|*10{+-6} {I4} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(M1)=1.4|*10{+-2} {I3} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.13 keV {I3} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R=0.63 {I11} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(M1)=5.8|*10{+-2} {I14} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.59 keV {I15} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$R=0.53 {I11} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(E1)=5.8|*10{+-6} {I14} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.56 keV {I14} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ R=0.70 {I14} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(M1)=5.6|*10{+-2} {I15}, 3.3|*10{+-2} {I5} if 100% branch for 10317|g (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.72 keV {I19} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: 10646.5 and 100 in 2009Sc07. 
$ R=0.75 {I5} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(M1)=33|*10{+-2} {I3} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=4.6 keV {I5} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.096 in table IV of 2009Lo06 seems to be a misprint; the evaluators have decreased it by a factor of 10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: 11151.2 and 100 in 2009Sc07. 
$ R=0.61 {I15} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(E1)=1.7|*10{+-6} {I3} (2009Sc07) 
$ B(M1)=1.6|*10{+-2} {I3} (2009Sc07) 
$ |G{-f}=0.25 keV {I5} (2009Sc07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of data from 2012Ku11, 1984Gu19 ({+28}Na |b{+-} decay), {+29}Na |b{+-}n decay and {+26}Mg(t,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$Using the Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LWM) averaging method of data 3081.3 keV {i3} (2012Ku11), 3087.4 keV {i9} (1984Gu19) of {+28}Na |b{+-} decay, 3083.4 keV {i7} (t,p|g), and 3080.9 keV {i10} ({+29}Na |b{+-}n decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of data from 2012Ku11, 1984Gu19 in {+28}Na |b{+-} decay and {+29}Na |b{+-}n decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1150.3 keV {i4} (t,p|g) and 1151.6 keV {i11} (2012Ku11 - {+28}Na |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 3697.5 keV {i7} (t,p|g) and 3694.2 keV {i13} (2012Ku11 - {+28}Na |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 3996.5 keV {i5} (t,p|g) and 3994.9 keV {i15} (2012Ku11 - {+28}Na |b{+-} decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 5269.1 keV 5 (2012Ku11) and 5271.7 keV 10 (1984Gu19). 
RI$From 2012Ku11. Other: 0.50 {I15} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}/A{-0}=0.63 {I4}, A{-4}/A{-0}=-1.77 {I7} for E{-t}=2.5 MeV; A{-2}/A{-0}=0.52 {I3}, A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.09 {I4} for E{-t}=2.9 MeV (1973Fi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.05 {I4}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.04 {I4} for E{-t}=2.5 MeV; A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.02 {I5}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.05 {I5} for E{-t}=2.9 MeV (1973Fi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}/A{-0}=0.37 {I6}, A{-4}/A{-0}=-0.14 {I9} for E{-t}=2.5 MeV; A{-2}/A{-0}=0.43 {I3}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.09 {I3} for E{-t}=2.9 MeV (1973Fi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}/A{-0}=-0.06 {I8}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.04 {I13} for E{-t}=2.5 MeV; A{-2}/A{-0}=0.04 {I6}, A{-4}/A{-0}=0.04 {I7} for E{-t}=2.9 MeV (1973Fi03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 305.1 {I2} from {+30}Na |b{+-} decay and 305.6 {I3} from {+31}Na |b{+-}n decay. Other: 300 {I5} from ({+31}Mg,{+30}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M,TI$from 2009Sc11 ({+30}Na |b{+-} decay). Earlier speculation of 1788|g E0 transition is confirmed by 2009Sc11, monopole strength |r{+2}(E0)=0.026 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$2005Ma96 ({+31}Na |b-n decay) argue 985.1|g to be of dominant M1 character from the B(E2) values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1820.5 {I3} from {+30}Na |b{+-} decay and 1820.4 {I6} from {+31}Na |b{+-}n decay. Other: 1817 {I2} from ({+31}Mg,{+30}Mg|g). Placement of 1820|g is shown from the 1820 keV level in {+30}Na |b{+-} decay (1984Gu19). 2005Ma96 ({+31}Na |b{+-}n decay) placed this |g-ray from the 3303 keV level based on the 1789-1820-1482 cascade |g-rays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1898.3 {I2} from {+30}Na |b{+-} decay and 1898.4 {I8} from ({+18}O,2p|g). Other: 1898 {I2} from ({+31}Mg,{+30}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1978.2 {I2} from {+30}Na |b{+-} decay and 1978.1 {I6} from {+31}Na |b{+-}n decay. Others: 1974.8 {I19} from ({+18}O,2p|g) and 1976 {I2} from ({+31}Mg,{+30}Mg|g) 
M$Q in ({+18}O,2p|g), not consistent with the latest spin assignments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Other: 990.0 {I5}, in ({+18}O,2p|g) the placement from 3461 keV level - fits poorly (deviation more than 5|s from the calculated value of 993.4). Most likely same E|g (994.7) from this level. Two close by levels have been proposed and confirmed in 2020Ni05 {+30}Na |b- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E the |g-ray reported in ({+18}O,2p|g) (2010De26) only. It appears that in ({+31}Mg,{+30}Mg|g) (2018Fe05) and in {+30}Na |b- decay (2020Ni05), same level has been proposed but only with 955|g. In ({+18}O,2p|g), however, 955|g has been placed from 5313 keV level. The evaluators mark this E|g as questionable placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E In 2005Ma96 ({+31}Na |b{+-}n decay), 1788|g is placed from the 5091.7 keV level based on the 1789-1820-1482 cascade |g-rays. In 2005Ma96, it is speculated that the levels at 5091.7 keV and 5093 keV (1993Kl02 - ({+31}Na |b-n decay)), are the same. Here only 5095.16 keV in this dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$other placement: comparable 956|g from 4252 keV level in ({+31}Mg,{+30}Mg|g) (2018Fe05) and 955.7|g from 4259.5 in {+30}Na |b- decay (2020Ni05), perhaps both 4252 and 4259.5 keV levels are same. Evaluators consider it as a questionable placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 305.6 {I3} (1993Kl02) and 305.4 {I5} (1984Gu19). 
RI$weighted average of 13.6 {I13} (1993Kl02) and 13.0 {I14} (1984Gu19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1820.2 {I6} (1993Kl02) and 1820.7 {I9} (1984Gu19). 
RI from 1984Gu19 
Placement of 1820|g is shown from the 1820 keV level in 1993Kl02. In 2005Ma96, it is placed from the 3303 keV level based on the 1789-1820-1482 cascade |g-rays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1978.0 {I6} (1993Kl02) and 1978.4 {I9} (1984Gu19). 1987|g is not reported in 2005Ma96. 
RI$weighted average of 29.2 {I26} (1993Kl02) and 22 {I3} (1984Gu19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1482.0 {I5} (2007Ma04), 1482.8 {I5} (1984Gu19) and 1482.0 {I10} (2008Tr04). Other: 1482 (1993Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 3.0 {I14} (1993Kl02) and 1.2 {I10} (1984Gu19) (Intensity per 100 decay). Other values: %I|g=7 {I1} (2008Tr04) of 1482|g is considerably higher than the values in 1993Kl02 and 1984Gu19. The reason for this difference is unknown. Relative intensity with respect to 885 keV |g-ray of {+32}Mg: 4.9 {I22} (1993Kl02), 4.2 {I5} (2007Ma04), 2.1 {I17} (1984Gu19) and 12 {I2} (2008Tr04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1482.8 {I5} (1984Gu19), 1483.1 {I2} (2020Ni05), 1484.2 {I10} (1979De02). Other: 1482.0 {I3} (1989Ba07 - possibly doublet considering the nearby 1479.5|g in 2020Ni05). 
RI$others: %I|g=74 {I4} (1979De02), %I|g=39 {I4} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 305.4 {I5} (1984Gu19), 305.6 {I3} (1989Ba07), 304.6 {I10} (1979De02), 304.8 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$unweighted average of 12.5 {I13} (1984Gu19), 11.4 {I7} (1989Ba07), 16.1 {I12} (2020Ni05). Other: %I|g=3.0 {I5} (1979De02) 
M$assumed from level scheme in 2009Sc11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$from 2009Sc11, a monopole strength of |r{+2}(E0)=0.026 {I8} is determined from E0(K+L) conversion intensity to the E2 |g-ray intensity and |g-ray lifetime measurements. 
TI$I(E0) determined by 2009Sc11 from I(E0:K+L)(1789)/I|g(306) 
|r{+2}(E0)=0.026 {I8} (2009Sc11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 985.4 {I9} (1984Gu19), 985.1 {I4} (1989Ba07), 985.4 {I10} (1979De02), 984.9 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 14.2 {I8} (1984Gu19), 14.5 {I9} (1989Ba07), 14.9 {I12} (2020Ni05). Other: %I|g=12.0 {I5} (1979De02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement in 2020Ni05. Weighted average of 1820.7 {I9} (1984Gu19), 1820.2 {I6} (1989Ba07), 1820.6 {I3} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 6.2 {I8} (1984Gu19), 5.4 {I4} (1989Ba07), 5.8 {I5} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1978.4 {I9} (1984Gu19), 1978.0 {I6} (1989Ba07), 1979.8 {I10} (1979De02), 1978.1 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$unweighted average of 23.8 {I16} (1984Gu19), 24.7 {I15} (1989Ba07), 16.3 {I23} (2020Ni05). Other: %I|g=15.0 {I15} (1979De02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2059.0 {I6} (1989Ba07), 2059.5 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$unweighted average of 2.0 {I3} (1989Ba07), 0.99 {I11} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3542.0 {I9} (1984Gu19 - possible doublet), 3541.1 {I11} (1989Ba07), 3542.4 {I3} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 6.8 {I12} (1984Gu19 - possibly doublet), 6.7 {I7} (1989Ba07), 5.5 {I6} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1505.7 {I10} (1984Gu19), 1505.8 {I4} (1989Ba07), 1505.9 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 8.2 {I7} (1984Gu19), 8.4 {I6} (1989Ba07), 7.8 {I6} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2498.7 {I10} (1984Gu19), 2497.8 {I13} (1989Ba07), 2499.3 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 1.9 {I6} (1984Gu19), 1.8 {I2} (1989Ba07), 1.61 {I15} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3179.8 {I9} (1984Gu19), 3178.8 {I10} (1989Ba07), 3179.3 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 10.5 {I16} (1984Gu19), 12.6 {I9} (1989Ba07), 11.5 {I10} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3484.6 {I10} (1984Gu19), 3484.0 {I10} (1989Ba07), 3484.1 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 9.8 {I16} (1984Gu19), 12.1 {I8} (1989Ba07), 9.6 {I8} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4967.6 {I9} (1984Gu19), 4966.5 {I12} (1989Ba07), 4966.8 {I1} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 11.3 {I25} (1984Gu19), 16.2 {I10} (1989Ba07), 14.1 {I12} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1560.3 {I18} (1984Gu19), 1559.6 {I4} (1989Ba07), 1559.6 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 3.2 {I6} (1984Gu19), 3.6 {I3} (1989Ba07), 2.78 {I23} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3541.1 {I11} (1989Ba07), 3539.3 {I3} (2020Ni05). Other: 3542.0 {I9} (1984Gu19 - doublet), 
RI$weighted average of 1.6 {I7} (1989Ba07), 1.83 {I29} (2020Ni05). Other: 6.8 {I12} (1984Gu19 - doublet). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5021.6 {I9} (1984Gu19), 5021.7 {I12} (1989Ba07), 5022.1 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 10.8 {I23} (1984Gu19), 12.7 {I8} (1989Ba07), 11.4 {I10} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1551.9 {I18} (1984Gu19), 1552.4 {I4} (1989Ba07), 1552.4 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$unweighted average of 4.2 {I6} (1984Gu19), 4.7 {I4} (1989Ba07), 3.36 {I28} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1789.2 {I18} (1984Gu19), 1788.0 {I7} (1989Ba07), 1791.3 {I2} (2020Ni05). In 1989Ba07, placement from 1790 keV level - unlikely for an E0 transition. 
RI$unweighted average of 5.5 {I7} (1984Gu19), 4.0 {I6} (1989Ba07), 3.21 {I27} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2626.0 {I13} (1989Ba07) and 2627.1 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 2.3 {I3} (1989Ba07), 1.81 {I18} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3611.0 {I14} (1989Ba07) and 3612.0 {I4} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 0.8 {I1} (1989Ba07), 0.74 {I33} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5094.6 {I12} (1984Gu19), 5094.3 {I12} (1989Ba07), 5094.7 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 5.8 {I14} (1984Gu19), 7.4 {I5} (1989Ba07), 6.6 {I6} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1871.7 {I18} (1984Gu19), 1870.7 {I10} (1989Ba07), 1871.0 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 1.7 {I7} (1984Gu19), 1.3 {I2} (1989Ba07), 1.24 {I12} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1951.5 {I7} (1989Ba07) and 1952.0 {I3} (2020Ni05). 
RI$unweighted average of 4.5 {I3} (1989Ba07) and 3.3 {I4} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3625.8 {I15} (1984Gu19), 3625.0 {I11} (1989Ba07), 3625.2 {I3} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 1.9 {I7} (1984Gu19), 3.1 {I3} (1989Ba07), 2.85 {I25} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3930.6 {I12} (1984Gu19), 3929.7 {I13} (1989Ba07), 3930.2 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 6.3 {I12} (1984Gu19), 6.6 {I5} (1989Ba07), 5.6 {I5} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5412.4 {I12} (1984Gu19), 5411.8 {I12} (1989Ba07), 5413.0 {I2} (2020Ni05). 
RI$weighted average of 4.9 {I12} (1984Gu19), 6.4 {I4} (1989Ba07), 5.8 {I5} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 3430.2 {I12} (1984Gu19). 
RI$weighted average of 2.5 {I8} (1984Gu19), 3.7 {I9} (2020Ni05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$The uncertainty contains an additional systematic uncertainty of 10% arising from the half-life determination (3.9 ns {I4} [2005Ma96]). Other: 15.1 {I23} from 8.6 {I13} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 2020Ki19. Other: 985 {I2} (2018Fe05). 
RI$other: 14.7 {I9} from 8.4 {I5} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1816 {I2} (2018Fe05) and 1820 {I3} (2020Ki19) 
RI$other: 22.8 {I14} from 13.0 {I8} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1975 {I2} (2018Fe05) and 1979 {I3} (2020Ki19) 
RI$other: 18.6 {I11} from 10.6 {I6} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 799 {I2} (2018Fe05) and 804 {I1} (2020Ki19) 
RI$other: 2.5 {I2} from 1.4 {I1} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 954 {I2} (2018Fe05) and 956 {I1} (2020Ki19) 
RI$other: 9.5 {I5} from 5.4 {I3} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2020Ki19. 1660 {I2} (unplaced in 2018Fe05). 
RI$other: 4.2 {I4} from 2.4 {I2} (2018Fe05, if I|g(1482)=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 170.9 {I1} from {+31}Na |b{+-} decay, 171.0 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-}n decay, 171.2 {I1} from {+33}Na |b{+-}2n decay, and 169.6 {I15} from (HI,x|g) 
RI$from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g). Others: 100 {I8} (2019Ni04), 100 {I6} (1993Kl02) and 100 {I7} (1984Gu19) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay, 100 {I22} from {+32}Na |b{+-}n decay, 100 {I12} from {+33}Na |b{+-}2n decay, and 100 {I6} from ({+32}Mg,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 220.8 {I1} from {+31}Na |b{+-} decay, 221.0 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-}n decay, 221.0 {I1} from {+33}Na |b{+-}2n decay, and 221.9 {I8} from (HI,x|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37.1 {I25} (2019Ni04), 40.6 {I32} (1993Kl02), and 44 {I5} (1984Gu19) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay, 40 {I6} from {+33}Na |b{+-}2n decay, 34.0 {I26} from ({+32}Mg,{+31}Mg|g), and 31.4 {I20} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g). Other: 49 {I10} from {+32}Na |b{+-}n decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 452.6 {I6} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 
RI$weighted average of 10.6 {I13} (2019Ni04) and 12.6 {I35} (1993Kl02) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay. Other: 20.6 {I28} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 623.3 {I5} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 
RI$from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g). Others: 100 {I13} (2019Ni04), 100 {I8} (1993Kl02) and 100 {I8} (1984Gu19) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
E$other: 673.2 {I7} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 64 {I4} (2019Ni04), 50 {I4} (1993Kl02) and 43.5 {I35} (1984Gu19) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay, and 53 {I4} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 724 from Coulomb excitation 
RI$weighted average of 17.0 {I23} (2019Ni04) from {+31}Na |b{+-} decay and 32 {I10} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 693.5 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-}n decay and 692.6 {I8} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1072.7 {I19} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 17.6 {I30} (2019Ni04) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay and 10.1 {I16} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1555.7 {I22} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 
RI$weighted average of 20.6 {I30} (2019Ni04) and 24.0 {I30} from ({+32}Al,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 12.6 {I9} (2019Ni04), 11.6 {I12} (1993Kl02), 11.6 {I11} (1984Gu19), and 22 {I7} (1979De02) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 33.3 {I19} (2019Ni04), 33.7 {I35} (1993Kl02), and 36 {I4} (1984Gu19) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay. Other: 32 {I21} from ({+32}Mg,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 25.9 {I19} (2019Ni04), 30.2 {I35} (1993Kl02), 30 {I4} (1984Gu19), and 29 {I9} (1979De02) in {+31}Na |b{+-} decay. Other: 37 {I21} from ({+32}Mg,{+31}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 170.8 {I5} (2007Ma04), 171.2 {I8} (1984Gu19), 171.0 {I5} (2008Tr04). Other: 171 (1993Kl02) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.6 {I6} (2007Ma04), 21.9 {I35} (1993Kl02), 9.0 {I25} (1984Gu19), 14 {I1} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 220.8 {I5} (2007Ma04), 221.7 {I9} (1984Gu19), 221.0 {I5} (2008Tr04). Other: 221 (1993Kl02) 
RI$unweighted average of 3.9 {I4} (2007Ma04), 8.9 {I18} (1993Kl02), 4.4 {I14} (1984Gu19), 9 {I1} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 239.9 {I5} (2007Ma04), 240.0 {I5} (2008Tr04). Other: 240 (1993Kl02) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.5 {I6} (2007Ma04), 9.7 {I11} (1993Kl02), 27.6 {I32} (1984Gu19), 16 {I1} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 894.1 {I5} (2007Ma04), 894.7 {I12} (1984Gu19), 895.0 {I10} (2008Tr04). Other: 895 {I1} (1993Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 4.1 {I5} (2007Ma04), 5.1 {I26} (1993Kl02), 4.3 {I10} (1984Gu19), 6 {I1} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2007Ma04. Other: 694.4 {I12} (1984Gu19), 696.0 {I1} (2008Tr04). This |g is a doublet with the 693.5|g from 3552 level in {+32}Mg 
RI$from 6.4 {I7}, weighted average of 6.9 {I6} (2007Ma04), 3.8 {I16} (1984Gu19), 6 {I1} (2008Tr04), for a doublet of this |g and the 693.5|g from 3552 level in {+32}Mg. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas. This transition is not observed in this work due to the isomeric half-life of the deexcited level and {+31}Mg residues quickly traveling through the detector setup for detecting prompt |g rays at a velocity near 0.4c. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 905 {I13} (2000PrZX) 
$B(M1)=0.1-0.5, depending on |d value and absolute E2 strength (2011Se05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$not observed in 2011Se05. Energy is from level-energy difference; 2011Se05 give an upper limit of 2.6 {I8} for intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 50.5 {I7} from 1993Kl02 
RI$weighted average of 22 {I3} (2019Ni04) and 20 {I4} (1993Kl02) 
$I|g(relative)=125 {I16} (1993Kl02). All relative I|g values in 1993Kl02, 1984Gu19, 1979De02 are relative to I(1484|g)=100 in {+30}Mg from {+31}Na |bn decay 
$I|g(relative)=100 (2019Ni04). All other relative I|g values in 2019Ni04 are relative to this value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$others: 170.5 {I5} (1993Kl02), 171.2 {I8} (1984Gu19) 
RI$weighted average of 5.1 {I9} (2019Ni04), 5.4 {I9} (1993Kl02), and 4.9 {I15} (1984Gu19) 
$I|g(relative)=35.0 {I20} (1993Kl02), 34.0 {I23} (1984Gu19) 
$I|g(relative)=24 {I2} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$others: 221.0 {I5} (1993Kl02), 221.7 {I9} (1984Gu19) 
RI$weighted average of 1.9 {I3} (2019Ni04), 2.2 {I4} (1993Kl02), and 2.1 {I7} (1984Gu19) 
$I|g(relative)=14.2 {I11} (1993Kl02), 15.0 {I15} (1984Gu19) 
$I|g(relative)=8.9 {I6} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 451.1 {I11} (1993Kl02) 
RI$weighted average of 0.4 {I1} (1993Kl02) and 0.37 {I7} (2019Ni04) 
$I|g(relative)=2.9 {I8} (1993Kl02) 
$I|g(relative)=1.7 {I2} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 622.6 {I14} (1993Kl02), 623.5 {I8} (1984Gu19), 623.7 {I10} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 3.6 {I6} (1993Kl02), 3.3 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 3.4 {I6} (2019Ni04). 
$I|g(relative)=23.0 {I18} (1993Kl02), 23.0 {I18} (1984Gu19). Other: 38 {I4} (1979De02) is discrepant 
$I|g(relative)=16 {I2} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 673.1 {I12} (1993Kl02), 673.8 {I12} (1984Gu19), 673.8 {I15} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 1.8 {I3} (1993Kl02), 1.4 {I4} (1984Gu19), and 2.2 {I4} (2019Ni04) 
$I|g(relative)=11.6 {I9} (1993Kl02), 10.0 {I8} (1984Gu19). Other: 24 {I3} (1979De02) is discrepant 
$I|g(relative)=10.2 {I7} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 894.6 {I7} (1993Kl02), 894.7 {I12} (1984Gu19) 
RI$weighted average of 0.9 {I2} (1993Kl02), 0.8 {I3} (1984Gu19), and 0.7 {I1} (2019Ni04) 
$I|g(relative)=5.8 {I12} (1993Kl02), 5.6 {I16} (1984Gu19) 
$I|g(relative)=3.0 {I2} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 807.6 {I6} (1993Kl02), 808.8 {I9} (1984Gu19), 809.8 {I15} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I3} (1993Kl02), 1.6 {I5} (1984Gu19), 1.2 {I2} (2019Ni04) 
$I|g(relative)=9.4 {I14} (1993Kl02), 11.0 {I18} (1984Gu19). Other: 26 {I4} (1979De02) is discrepant 
$I|g(relative)=5.7 {I6} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 214.7 {I9} (1993Kl02), 1214.4 {I9} (1984Gu19), 1222 {I2} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 1.6 {I3} (1993Kl02), 1.2 {I4} (1984Gu19), and 1.5 {I3} (2019Ni04) 
$I|g(relative)=10.0 {I10} (1993Kl02), 8.6 {I8} (1984Gu19), 13 {I4} (1979De02) 
$I|g(relative)=6.8 {I5} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2019Ni04. Other: 1570.1 {I12} (1993Kl02). The placement is made by 2019Ni04 based on |g|g-coin. 1993Kl02 place this |g from a level at 3815, with no coincidence data reported to support this placement. This |g is observed by 2019Ni04 to be in coincidence with 673|g but not with 2244|g from the 2244 level which is proposed by 1993Kl02 to be fed by this |g. Besides, the energy of this |g is consistent with the level energy difference between the 2244 and 673 levels. 
RI$from 2019Ni04. Other: 2.6 {I5} (1993Kl02) is discrepant 
$I|g(relative)=16.8 {I19} (1993Kl02) 
$I|g(relative)=1.1 {I2} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2022.0 {I7} (1993Kl02), 2022.5 {I9} (1984Gu19), 2030.5 {I25} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 4.5 {I9} (1993Kl02), 3.9 {I13} (1984Gu19), and 3.9 {I7} (2019Ni04) 
$I|g(relative)=29 {I3} (1993Kl02), 27 {I3} (1984Gu19). Other: 12 {I4} (1979De02) is discrepant 
$I|g(relative)=18 {I1} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2192.8 {I6} (1993Kl02), 2193.1 {I8} (1984Gu19), 2192.8 {I25} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 4.0 {I8} (1993Kl02), 3.1 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 3.0 {I5} (2019Ni04). 
$I|g(relative)=26 {I3} (1993Kl02), 22 {I3} (1984Gu19), 17 {I5} (1979De02) 
$I|g(relative)=14 {I1} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2243.5 {I6} (1993Kl02), 2243.8 {I6} (1984Gu19), 2247.6 {I25} (1979De02) 
RI$weighted average of 13.3 {I23} (1993Kl02), 10.6 {I33} (1984Gu19), and 12 {I2} (2019Ni04). 
$I|g(relative)=86 {I5} (1993Kl02), 74 {I5} (1984Gu19), 58 {I6} (1979De02) 
$I|g(relative)=54 {I4} (2019Ni04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3537.7 {I12} (1993Kl02), 3537.6 {I12} (1984Gu19) 
RI$weighted average of 1.2 {I3} (1993Kl02) and 0.8 {I4} (1984Gu19) 
$I|g(relative)=7.8 {I16} (1993Kl02), 5.5 {I18} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 885.0 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-} decay, 885.3 {I1} from {+33}Na |b{+-}n decay, 887 {I7} from ({+32}Mg,{+32}Mg'|g), 885 {I15} from ({+36}S,X|g), 886 {I4} from ({+46}Ar,X|g), and 885 {I9} Coulomb excitation. Other: 860 {I50} from ({+32}Mg,{+32}Mg'|g); 883.9 {I3} from ({+32}Mg,{+32}Mg'|g) is discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1436.1 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-} decay, 1437.0 {I3} from {+33}Na |b{+-}n decay, 1433 {I9} from ({+32}Mg,{+32}Mg'|g), 1434.9 {I13} from ({+32}Mg,{+32}Mg'|g), 1437 {I2} from ({+33}Mg,X|g), and 1438 {I4} from ({+46}Ar,X|g). Others: 1430 {I15} from ({+36}S,X|g), 1460 {I50} from ({+32}Mg,{+32}Mg'|g), and 1438 {I12} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1666 {I3} from ({+33}Mg,X|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I6} from {+32}Na |b{+-} decay and 38 {I4} from ({+33}Mg,X|g). Other: 105 {I12} from ({+34}Si,X|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2550.7 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-} decay and 2551 {I1} from {+33}Na |b{+-}n decay. Others: 2551 {I4} from ({+33}Mg,X|g) 
RI$from ({+33}Mg,X|g). Others: 100 {I9} from {+32}Na |b{+-} decay, 100 {I12} from ({+34}Si,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+33}Na |b{+-}n decay. Others: 2151.7 {I5} from {+32}Na |b{+-} decay, 2152 {I3} from ({+33}Mg,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weak |g from 2002Az02, |g not reported by 2004Bb03. A 2869.2 {I8} |g ray is reported in {+32}Na |b{+-} decay, but it is not assigned in the decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from Adopted Gammas. Values from this study: 885 {I20} (2003Ba52), 885 (2019El09) 
RI$other: 68 {I7} relative to observed fragments (2003Ba52) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 165 {I+4}(stat){I+2}(syst) (2019El09). A value of 170 {I2} is used by 2019El09 for deducing B(E2)|^ and it is weighted average of their value and 172 {I2} from 2010Wi11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 1430 {I20} (2003Ba52) 
RI$others: 31 {I5} (2021El06); 32 {I10} relative to observed fragments (2003Ba52) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2238 {I3} (2022Ki08) and 2241 {I4} (2021El06) 
RI$other: 8.3 {I18} (2021El06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 885.5 {I7} (1984Gu19), 885 (1993Kl02), 885.0 {I5} (2008Tr04) 
$%I|g: 58 {I3} from (2008Tr04). Others: 59 {I9} (1993Kl02), 60 {I9} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1436.1 {I10} (1984Gu19), 1436 (1993Kl02), 1436.0 {I10} (2008Tr04) 
RI$others: 10.2 {I20} (1984Gu19), 9.8 {I25} (1993Kl02), 15 {I2} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 6.1 {I15} (1984Gu19), 5.8 {I16} (1993Kl02), 9 {I1} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2550.7 {I10} (1984Gu19), 2551 (1993Kl02), 2551.0 {I10} (2008Tr04) 
RI$others: 9.1 {I20} (1984Gu19), 10.2 {I25} (1993Kl02), 8 {I2} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 5.5 {I15} (1984Gu19), 6.0 {I16} (1993Kl02), 4.8 {I11} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1973.0 {I12} (1984Gu19), 1973 (1993Kl02), 1974.0 {I10} (2008Tr04) 
RI$others: 14.3 {I25} (1984Gu19), 19.7 {I25} (1993Kl02), 13 {I2} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 8.6 {I20} (1984Gu19), 11.6 {I25} (1993Kl02),7 {I1} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2151.5 {I7} (1984Gu19), 2152 (1993Kl02), 2152.0 {I10} (2008Tr04) 
RI$others: 53 {I6} (1984Gu19), 48.5 {I37} (1993Kl02), 47 {I4} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 32 {I6} (1984Gu19), 28.5 {I41} (1993Kl02), 27 {I3} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$doublet with total intensity=6.9 {I6}. The second component is from {+31}Na decay to {+31}Mg 
E$others: 694.4 {I12} (1984Gu19), 696.0 {I10} (2008Tr04). 
RI$others: 3.8 {I16} (1984Gu19), 6 {I1} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 2.3 {I13} (1984Gu19), 3.4 {I6} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1232.2 {I12} (1984Gu19), 1232 (1993Kl02), 1232.0 {I10} (2008Tr04) 
RI$from 3.8 {I5} for a doublet. Others: 4.9 {I14} (1984Gu19), 4.8 {I17} (1993Kl02), 10 {I2} (2008Tr04), for doublet 
$%I|g: others: 2.9 {I9} (1984Gu19), 2.8 {I10} (1993Kl02), 6 {I1} (2008Tr04), for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1782.4 {I9} (1984Gu19) and 1783.0 {I10} (2008Tr04). A 1783|g was seen by 2007Ma04 but the intensity was not deduced due to the presence of a 1778.9|g from {+28}Al decay to {+28}Mg. 
RI$weighted average 8.3 {I20} (1984Gu19) and 10 {I2} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 5.0 {I14} (1984Gu19), 5.6 {I11} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 3934.8 {I18} (1984Gu19), 3935 (1993Kl02), 3935.0 {I15} (2008Tr04) 
RI$others: 13 {I3} (1984Gu19), 18.3 {I37} (1993Kl02), 18 {I4} (2008Tr04). 
$%I|g: others: 8.0 {I22} (1984Gu19), 10.8 {I26} (1993Kl02), 10 {I2} (2008Tr04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 483.6 {I10} from ({+33}Mg,{+33}Mg'|g), 484 {I6} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g), 483 {I4} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g), and 485 {I1} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 561 {I17} from ({+33}Mg,{+33}Mg'|g) 
$2001Nu02 in {+33}Na |b{+-} decay considered different scenarios for the placement of 546|g and proposed placement from 705 level to a 159 level as the probable one, which is also adopted by 2021Ba28 in {+9}Be({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) without further supporting evidence. However, this |g could also define a level of this energy, a possibility which 2001Nu02 considered less likely based on rather weak arguments. 2006El03 observed a 561 {I17} |g in {+1}H({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g), which they suggested was most likely the same as 546.2|g in decay work, but no 704.9|g was seen in that study, which may imply that 546.2|g and 704.9|g de-excite different levels. Moreover, the non-observation of this 546|g and observations of 220|g and 703|g from 703 level by 2017Ri06 in {+9}Be({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g), and the observations of all those three transitions by 2021Ba28 with 546|g much stronger than 705|g further support that 546|g and 703|g deexcite different levels. Therefore a level at 546.2 keV has been defined and adopted by the evaluators for the placement of 546|g. A review of available experimental work by 2011Ne14 also suggests this placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 219 {I8} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) and 220 {I4} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g). 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I4} from {+33}Na |b{+-} decay and 62 {I15} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 703 {I8} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) and 703 {I4} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g). 
RI$others: 100 {I29} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) and 100 {I31} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g). Other: 295 {I7} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) 
RI$from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g). Other: 100 {I27} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g). Other: 779 {I12} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) 
RI$weighted average of 21 {I5} from ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) and 25 {I8} from ({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$2001Nu02 considered different scenarios for the placement of 546|g and proposed placement from 705 level to a 159 level as the probable one, which is also adopted by 2021Ba28 in {+9}Be({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g) without further supporting evidence. However, this |g could also define a level of this energy, a possibility which 2001Nu02 considered less likely based on rather weak arguments. 2006El03 observed a 561 {I17} |g in {+1}H({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g), which they suggested was most likely the same as 546.2|g in decay work, but no 704.9|g was seen in that study, which may imply that 546.2|g and 704.9|g de-excite different levels. Moreover, the non-observation of this 546|g and observations of 220|g and 703|g from 703 level by 2017Ri06 in {+9}Be({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g), and the observations of all those three transitions by 2021Ba28 with 546|g much stronger than 703|g further support that 546|g and 703|g deexcite different levels. Therefore a level at 546.2 keV has been defined in Adopted Levels by the evaluators and is also adopted here and the placement from 705 level is considered as questionable. 
$Other: E|g=546.5 {I10}, I|g=40 {I13} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$doublet. The second component is assigned to a transition in {+31}Mg populated by {+33}Na |b{+-}2n decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentative placement (2001Nu02), but the evaluators suggest that the main placement is from 546 level. See comments at 546.2|g from 546 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 2006FuZX. Other: 484 {I20} (2006El03) 
$|s=33 mb {I10} in {+1}H({+33}Mg,{+33}Mg'|g) (2006El03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from {+1}H({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg'|g) in 2006El03, possibly the same as 546.2|g in {+33}Na |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement of this |g is adopted by 2021Ba28 from the hypothesis of 2001Nu02 in {+33}Na |b{+-} decay, who considered different scenarios for the placement of 546|g and proposed the placement from 705 level to a 159 level as the probable one and the placement from a 546 level as less likely based on rather weak arguments. 2006El03 observed a 561 {I17} |g in {+1}H({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g), which they suggested was most likely the same as 546.2|g in decay work, but no 704.9|g was seen in that study, which may imply that 546.2|g and 704.9|g de-excite different levels. Moreover, the non-observation of this 546|g and observations of 220|g and 703|g from 703 level by 2017Ri06 in {+9}Be({+46}Ar,{+33}Mg|g), and the observations of all those three transitions by 2021Ba28 with 546|g much stronger than 703|g further support that 546|g and 703|g deexcite different levels. Therefore a level at 546.2 keV has been defined in Adopted Levels by the evaluators and the placement from 705 level is considered as questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$seen in the coincidence spectrum with 484|g in ({+34}Mg,{+33}Mg|g), but not in ({+34}Al,{+33}Mg|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 685 {I16} (2006El03), 659 {I14} (2005Ch66), 660 {I10} (2001Yo03), 656 {I7} (2001Iw07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$|g not observed by 2005Ch66 or 2001Iw07; only an upper limit of intensity of this |g obtained by 2005Ch66 to correct for the feeding of first 2+ state at 659. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$In 2017Mo26, a transition of 616 keV {I8}, considered to be the same as 621 gamma here, is assigned to a separate level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 659 {I6} (2019Cr02, ({+40}Al,{+36}Mg|g)); 666 {I5} (2016Do03, Pb({+36}Mg,{+36}Mg'|g)); 656 {I13} (2014Mi09, {+1}H({+36}Mg,{+36}Mg'|g)); 662 {I6} (2013Do22, ({+37}Al,{+36}Mg|g)); and 660 {I6} (2007Ga34, ({+38}Si,{+36}Mg|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1319 {I21} (2019Cr02, ({+40}Al,{+36}Mg|g)); and 1370 {I20} (2013Do22, ({+37}Al,{+36}Mg|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$peak observed near 660 keV is associated by 2014Ko14 to the 662 keV transition to the g.s., known from 2013Do22 and 2007Ga34 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$possible weak peak observed near 1400 keV is associated with the 1370 keV transition to the first 2+ state, known from 2013Do22 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from spectral Fig. 2 in 2019Cr02. Uncertainty of 3 keV in the text on page 2 of the paper is a misprint, as communicated in e-mail reply of March 11, 2019 from H.L. Crawford. Other E|g=659 {I6} (2013Do22: Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 212502), also from RIBF-RIKEN. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from spectral Fig. 2 in 2019Cr02. E|g=1326 keV {I14} keV in the text on page 2 of the paper is incorrect, as communicated in e-mail reply of March 11, 2019 from H.L. Crawford. Other E|g=1360 {I20} (2013Do22), also from RIBF-RIKEN. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Observed counts=74 {I15}(stat) {I9}(syst). As this |g ray is more intense by |?2.5 times than the 670|g, it is assigned from the first excited state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1614 keV {I9} and 1618 keV {I8}, measured in {+9}Be({+22}Mg,{+23}Al|g) and {+9}Be({+23}Al,{+23}Al|g), respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_comment:
E$Others: 426 (1979Sh11), 439 {I2} (1966Ar02 - appears to be in the decay of {+23}Mg (11.3 s). 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Measured value by 2017Ma18, also deduced an average value of 0.151 {I9} considering their and other literature data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$measured R and A are consistent with dipole transition with zero mixing ratio. Solution for |d only shown graphically in Figure 3. 
$R=0.98 {I7}; A=0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$R=0.95 {I7}; A=0.34 {I5} 
M,MR$measured R and A are consistent with quadrupole transition with |d=0. Solution for |d only shown graphically in Figure 3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.032 {I66} (1954Sh28) 
MR$Weighted average of -0.03 {I5} (1971Bo36), -0.03 {I2} (1972La28), and +0.004 {I6} (1972He22) is +0.001 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g-ray energy reported in (n,|g)-1982Sc14, but not placed in the level scheme. Placement of |g ray is from (d,p|g). I|g in 1982Sc14 is 14.5 {i9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by the evaluator from a total transition intensity of 95.0 (1969Al17), consistent with the intensity balance at this level. Based on log ft>11 for a second forbidden transition, I(|b{+-} to 30.64 level)<0.0063% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$E|g from level-energy differences. Fractional branching<0.5% from 972 keV level (1969Al17). 972|g not adopted, |g-ray transition 0+ to 3+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$This |g ray is feeding 2566 keV level. Which is revised as non-existing. So the |g ray is not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Placement marked as questionable as it is an unlikely transition, 7/2+ to 1/2+ implied [M3], from a level of half-life 22 fs. Not adopted by the evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 243.8 {I1} from {+30}Mg |b{+-} decay, 243.90 {I8} from ({+18}O,pn|g), and 243.7 {I5} from ({+14}C,pn|g) 
M$from 244|g(|q) in ({+14}C,pn|g)-2008Hi05, ({+18}O,pn|g), and RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 443.8 {I1} from {+30}Mg |b{+-} decay, 443.63 {I8} from ({+18}O,pn|g), and 444.1 {I5} from ({+14}C,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1119.3 {I13} from ({+18}O,pn|g) and 1120.2 {I10} from ({+14}C,pn|g) 
RI$other: 46 {I9} ({+14}C,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1658.9 {I1} from ({+18}O,pn|g) and 1661.5 {I14} from ({+14}C,pn|g) 
RI other: 43 {I14} ({+14}C,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E other: 1605.1 {I25} ({+14}C,pn|g) placed differently from 3904.2 keV level. 
M$from ({+18}O,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$no evidence of this 1319|g is found by 2010St13 ({+18}O,pn|g), thus no state is reported. Level and |g-ray are not adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$uncertain placement in 2008Hi05. 2010St13 also did not observe. Placed from 5500.73 keV level in the adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g(|q) of 1605- to 1607-keV possible doublet shows predominately |DJ=1 character, a weaker transition of E2 not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 244.3 {I5} (1984Gu19), 243.9 {I5} (2008Hi05), 242.9 {I7} (1979De02), 243.8 {I1} (2016Ol06). 
RI$others: %I|g=73.5 {I12} (1979De02), %I|g(244.3) > 71 (1984Gu19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 444.0 {I5} (1984Gu19), 443.9 {I5} (2008Hi05), 443.2 {I7} (1979De02), 443.8 {I1} (2016Ol06). 
RI$other: 94 {I6} (2016Ol06) 
RI$%I|g=71 {I10} (1984Gu19) and %I|g=81 {I16} (1979De02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 688.0 {I10} (1984Gu19), 686.8 {I20} (2008Hi05), 684.6 {I13} (1979De02), 687.7 {I1} (2016Ol06). 
RI$unweighted average of 2.3 {I3} (2008Hi05), and 6.0 {I3} (2016Ol06). Other: %I|g=3.5 {I6} (1979De02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1724.9 {I15} (2008Hi05) and 1724.6 {I2} (2016Ol06). 
RI$unweighted average of 6.4 {I8} (2008Hi05), and 3.1 {I4} (2016Ol06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2168.9 {I12} (1984Gu19), 2169.8 {I15} (2008Hi05), 2165.0 {I16} (1979De02), 2169.1 {I1} (2016Ol06). 
RI$weighted average of 3.5 {I5} (2008Hi05), and 3.1 {I3} (2016Ol06). Others: %I|g=3.0 {I5} (1979De02), %I|g=3.0 {I10} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 946.6 {I5} (1993Kl02), 946.9 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 947.0 {I10} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 78.3 {I56} (1993Kl02), 87.5 {I50} (1984Gu19), and 78.3 {I57} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 666.2 {I7} (1993Kl02), 665.5 {I8} (1984Gu19), and 665.7 {I13} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 34.0 {I24} (1993Kl02), 29.4 {I20} (1984Gu19), and 32.4 {I37} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1626.2 {I5} (1993Kl02), 1626.2 {I6} (1984Gu19), and 1626.4 {I12} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 63.6 {I46} (1993Kl02), 68.8 {I18} (1984Gu19), and 67.3 {I71} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1820.0 {I8} (1993Kl02), 1820.0 {I9} (1984Gu19), and 1820.1 {I11} (2005Ma86) 
RI$unweighted average of 8.8 {I12} (1993Kl02), 9.4 {I11} (1984Gu19), and 15.0 {I18} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2487.6 {I15} (1993Kl02), 2487.5 {I18} (1984Gu19), and 2487.3 {I12} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 4.8 {I8} (1993Kl02), 3.8 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 3.7 {I7} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3431.8 {I12} (1993Kl02),3433.0 {I8} (1984Gu19), and 3433.3 {I14} (2005Ma86) 
RI$2005Ma86 claim two very close |g-rays from different levels, one from the 3433 level, the other from a 5046 level; the differences were unresolved by earlier experiments and all the intensity from earlier experiments is attributed to this level feeding alone. Others: 16.2 {I15} (1993Kl02) and 15 {I2} (1984Gu19) for unresolved doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2676.1 {I10} (1993Kl02),2675.6 {I9} (1984Gu19), and 2675.6 {I13} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 7.7 {I8} (1993Kl02), 6.3 {I14} (1984Gu19), and 8.7 {I17} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3621.9 {I13} (1993Kl02),3623.0 {I9} (1984Gu19), and 3623.4 {I8} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 18.2 {I15} (1993Kl02), 16.9 {I22} (1984Gu19), and 18.4 {I52} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 904.0 {I8} (1993Kl02), 903.7 {I12} (1984Gu19), and 903.6 {I11} (2005Ma86) 
RI$unweighted average of 5.3 {I6} (1993Kl02), 6.3 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 3.8 {I4} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2529.8 {I10} (1993Kl02), 2529.8 {I9} (1984Gu19), and 2529.5 {I10} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 8.7 {I9} (1993Kl02), 8.8 {I15} (1984Gu19), and 9.8 {I18} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3196.2 {I10} (1993Kl02), 3197.0 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 3196.5 {I12} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 13.0 {I14} (1993Kl02), 11.9 {I19} (1984Gu19), 14.6 {I36} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2949.0 {I10} (1993Kl02), 2949.8 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 2949.5 {I11} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 12.3 {I12}(1993Kl02), 11.2 {I16} (1984Gu19), and 13.1 {I29} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4809.0 {I15} (1993Kl02) and 4808.3 {I20} (1984Gu19) 
RI$weighted average of 2.3 {I6} (1993Kl02) and 2.2 {I12} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4201.1 {I14} (1993Kl02), 4203.2 {I10} (1984Gu19), and 4203.5 {I17} (2005Ma86) 
RI$weighted average of 5.7 {I9} (1993Kl02), 7.5 {I12} (1984Gu19), and 7.4 {I25} (2005Ma86) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 735.5 {I12} from {+32}Mg |b{+-} decay, 735.5 {I6} from ({+32}Al,{+32}Al'|g), 734.1 {I3} from ({+36}S,X|g), and 735.2 {I3} from ({+37}Cl,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 221.6 {I3} from ({+36}S,x|g) and 222.2 {I3} from ({+37}Cl,x|g). See comment for 221.4|g from 1178 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+37}Cl,x|g). 221.9|g from 957 level and 221.4|g from 1178 level are unresolved in {+32}Mg |b{+-} decay and ({+32}Al,{+32}Al'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI$2017LiZZ report an absolute intensity of 3.3 {I8} per 100 {+33}Mg decays using the adopted %|b{+-}n=14 {I2} and measured counts of {+33}Mg decays and 2765|g transition. This transition is not seen in other |b{+-}n studies but is seen in {+32}Mg |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 731 {I2} (1979De02), 735 (2004Gr08) 
RI$other: 10.6 {I24} (1984Gu19) 
$Relative intensity=42 {I9} (1984Gu19), 36 {I15} (1979De02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2750 {I5} (1979De02), 2765 (2004Gr08) 
RI$other: 25 {I1} (1984Gu19) 
$Relative intensity=100 (1984Gu19, 1979De02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 2466 (2004Gr08) 
RI$other: 4 {I2} (1984Gu19), (2467|g)(735|g) coin seen by 1993Kl02 
$Relative intensity=16 {I8} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+34}Mg |b{+-}n decay. Other: 1621 {I4} from ({+34}Si,{+33}Al|g); 1618 from {+33}Mg |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$could be a doublet of 2080|g from 3704 level and 2101|g from 2101 level in ({+34}Si,{+33}Al|g) (2017Mu05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2006AnZW and 2017Mu05; placed from a 3714 level in 2008Tr07. It could be a doublet of 2080|g from 3704 level and 2101|g from 2101 level in 2017Mu05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement by the evaluators based on placement of 596|g; placed from a 4310 level in 2008Tr07; not reported in 2006AnZW and 2017Mu05 
RI$ not listed by 2008Tr07, deduced by the evaluators from intensity balance=13 {I2} at 4310 level quoted in FIG.3 of 2008Tr07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement from 2008Tr07. It could be a doublet of 2080|g from 3704 level and 2101|g from 2101 level in 2017Mu05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$2023Lu07 mention that some contributions from a |g transition in {+34}Al (possibly through the |b{+-}2n decay of {+36}Mg decay) can not be completely ruled out. A similar energy transition has previously been reported in Coulomb excitation of {+34}Al (2001Pr08: Phys. Rev. C 63, 047308) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1860 {I10} (2006Yo05), 1870 {I6} (2020Lo05) both from ({+26}Si,{+24}Si|g) and 1874 {I3} from ({+23}Al,n|g). 
M$Populated in Coulomb excitation (2002Ka80). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1550 {I12} (2006Yo05), 1569 {I7} (2020Lo05) both from ({+26}Si,{+24}Si|g) and 1575 {I3} from ({+23}Al,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 1860 {I10} (2006Yo05) and 1870 {I6} (2020Lo05). Uncertainty is the lower input value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$The other value -3.7(18) (1968Ro18) is rejected in both 1968Ro18 and 1969Be31 on the basis of unlikely transition probability implications. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$From ({+3}He,n|g) - 1969Be31. 
RI$Others: 47 {I4} (2014Ko41) and 43 {I14} (1969Be31) both in ({+3}He,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$From 2007Se02 ({+16}O,2n|g). Other: 61 {I5} (2015Do07) ({+3}He,n|g). Evaluators adopt as the strongest branch along with supporting evidence in 2014Ko41 ({+3}He,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$From 2007Se02 ({+16}O,2n|g). Other: 100 {I5} (2015Do07) ({+3}He,n|g). Evaluators adopt this as a weaker branch along with supporting evidence in 2014Ko41 ({+3}He,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$a |g at 4094 keV {i4} was also observed in 1969Be31 and tentatively assigned to deexcite a level at 4094 keV, with additional weaker |g rays. However, this state was not established in subsequent coincidence measurements in 2007Se02 ({+16}O,2n|g), 2015Do07 ({+3}He,n|g), and 2014Ko41 ({+3}He,n|g), suggesting it is likely to have been misplaced in 1969Be31. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$Reported as the 100% branch in 1969Be31. 
M$Reported as E2 in 1969Be31, evaluators assign (M1+E2) based on reported mixing ratio in 1968Ro18. 
MR$-4.7 {I20} in 1968Ro18 proposing the transition from 3(+) to 2+. 1969Be31 propose this transition as E2 from (4+) to 2+. See comments for spin and parity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Evaluators believe this E|g is the same as the 4092-keV |g that depopulates the 5889.9-keV level. 
RI$Reported as the 100% branch in 1969Be31. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$Other: 2341.6 {I4} and 24.7 {I5}, respectively (2014Ko41) 
$|G{-|g}>2.4|*10{+-6} keV (1969Be31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$Average of 2360.8 {I4} (2015Do07) and 2357.7 {I2} (2014Ko41). 
RI$Other: 2357.7 {I2} and 4.6 {I2} (2014Ko41) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=1761.1 {I3} 
E,RI$Others: 1762.0 {I4} and 1.7 {I1}, respectively (2014Ko41); 1765 {I3} (1969Be31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1741.6 {I6}(stat) {I3}(syst) measured by 2013Be41. 
$Absolute I|g(1742)=0.18% {I5}(stat) {I4}(lit.) based on I|g(1796)=52% {I11} from 2004Th09 and I|g(1742)/I|g(1796)=0.0034 {I9} from the 1742- and 1796-keV peak areas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$newly observed transition. Source of peak as single escape to the 5667.2 transition was investigated using GEANT4 simulations and confirmed to be a new transition (2023Ca13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$In ENSDF - placement of a comparable weak 2635|g from 5282 keV level probably a mistake - as it could not be confirmed by compiler from its source reference 1977St32 (Nucl.Phys. A291, 269). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$2016Ka05 see some evidence of this |g ray, however, for (d,n) cross section only dominant branch (5575|g) was used. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$2016Mc09 give %I|g(782|g)=40.66 {I24}, which disagrees with 54.38 {I18} implied from the normalization factor. Note that the value given by 2016Mc09 is close to the |e+|b{++} feeding of 38.80% {I45} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Reported as 6.032 in 1982Al27 (probably a typo). Adjusted by the evaluator based on the intensity balance and beta feeding to this state 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR From 1971Sh11 (|a,p|g). Also same in 1963Br15 (p,p') - no dataset presented - measured |g yields, |g(|q), deduced |d. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 80.8 {I24} from {+30}Al |b{+-} decay, 93 {I12} from {+30}P |e decay, 73 {I4} from ({+18}O,2n|g), 89 {I9} from (|a,p|g), 98.4 {I31} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 54 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 80 {I10} from {+30}P |e decay, 82 {I9} from (|a,p|g), and 85.1 {I25} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 100 {I19} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 16.1 {I16} from {+30}Al |b{+-} decay, 3.2 {I5} from ({+18}O,2n|g), 9.0 {I20} from (|a,p|g), and 10.3 {I11} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I24} from {+30}Al |b{+-} decay, 100 {I4} from ({+18}O,2n|g), 100.0 {I20} from (|a,p|g), and 100.0 {I29} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 400.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,2n|g) and 400.9 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 3.78 {I27} from ({+18}O,2n|g) and 4.5 {I18} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2994.5 {I6} from ({+18}O,2n|g) and 2996.2 {I9} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 12.6 {I9} from ({+18}O,2n|g), 13.0 {I20} from (|a,p|g), and 10.8 {I27} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 11 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 90 {I4} from ({+18}O,2n|g), 92 {I8} from (|a,p|g), and 96 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI other: 100 {I7} ({+18}O,2n|g) - presumably the intensity of 2368.0|g and 4088.7|g were switched in 2010St13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI other: 72 {I10} ({+18}O,2n|g) - presumably the intensity of 4088.7|g and 2368.0|g were switched in 2010St13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: (3.52 {I3}) |* 10{+3} (1961Ro12). 
RI$weighted average of 47 {I2} (1974Kl07) and 50.4 {I15} (1974Al09). Other: 64 {I6} (1961Ro12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by the evaluators with respect to I|g(1534.12)=0.25 and the branching ratio in the adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators with respect to I|g(4810)=3.27 {I26} and the branching ratio in the adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other: 1311.5 {I6} (1974Al09) 
RI$deduced by evaluators with respect to I|g(4810)=3.27 {I26} and the branching ratio in the adopted dataset. Other: 3.94 {I19} - deduced value in 1974Al09 (see Tables III and I) based on adopted data in 1973EnVA. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators with respect to I|g(1732.3)=2.87 {I18} and the branching ratio in the adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$|g not listed in 1974Al09. 
RI$deduced by evaluators with respect to I|g(1732.3)=2.87 {I18} and the branching ratio in the adopted dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by evaluators with respect to I|g(1732.3)=2.87 {I18} and the branching ratio in the adopted dataset. In Table III (1974Kl07) - %branching |<73 and I|g<0.9 with respect to I|g(2235)=100. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.059 {I3} (1980Wi13) and 0.061 {I6} (1974Al09). Other: I|g=0.087 {I9} (1973Go13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Pol=+0.36 {I+9-7} (1980Bi14) 
M$from |g(|q) and polarization measurements. 
MR Other: -0.10 {I10} (1980Bi14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR -0.39 {I9} or +3.8 {I+15-10} for a 5+ to 4+ transition OR +0.7 {I5} for a 4+ to 4+ transition (1980Bi14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR |@ for 6+ to 4+ transition OR +2.2 {I+13-10} for a 5+ to 4+ transition OR +0.8 {I+2-4} for a 4+ to 4+ transition (1980Bi14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from level energy difference - assumed and uncertain in 1970Oh03, not adopted - no such |g in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M,MR based on |a-|g(|q) in 1970Du03. |d=-0.18 {I30} was deduced by authors of 1970Oh03 if J{+|p}=4+ and |d=1.4 {I6}, if 2+, based on |g|g(|q) analysis. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 942.6 {I4} from ({+18}O,|an|g) and 943.2 {I7} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 1.2 {I4} from ({+18}O,|an|g), 1.01 {I25} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 4.2 {I21} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1694.73 {I30} from {+31}Al |b{+-} decay and 1695.0 {I3} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g). Other: 100 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in (d,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 621.81 {I30} from {+31}Al |b{+-} decay and 622.19 {I20} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 621.5 {I15} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
RI$weighted average of 13.6 {I10} (1973Go22) from {+31}Al |b{+-} decay and 18 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Others: 17 {I11} from ({+18}O,|an|g) and 14 {I8} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1564.49 {I30} from {+31}Al |b{+-} decay and 1564.2 {I4} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 1564.6 {I20} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
RI$from 1973Go22 in {+31}Al |b{+-} decay (644 ms). Others: 22 {I11} from ({+18}O,|an|g), 22 {I6} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 25 {I8} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2316.64 {I40} from {+31}Al |b{+-} decay and 2316.80 {I14} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 2315.7 {I20} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
RI$from 1973Go22 in {+31}Al |b{+-} decay. Others: 100 {I17} from ({+18}O,|an|g), 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 100 {I8} from (d,p|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in (d,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$other: 2037.7 {I30} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.9 {I12} from ({+18}O,|an|g) and 5.3 {I21} from (d,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 2787.6 {I8} from {+31}Al |b{+-} decay, 2788.3 {I12} from ({+18}O,|an|g), 2790.1 from (d,p|g) 
RI$from (d,p|g). Other: 100 {I18} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in (d,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$D+Q with |d=-0.11 {I10} from (d,p|g); E1+M2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments; M2 component not allowed by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
E$other: 2780.0 {I15} from ({+18}O,|an|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I9} from (d,p|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from |g|g(|q) in (d,p|g); E1(+M2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 752.44 {I15} (1972Dz13), 752.4 {I2} (1970Sp02), 753.0 {I10} (1970Be48), 752.215 {I23} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 94 {I10} (1972Dz13), 94 {I17} (1970Be48), 102 {I3} (Budapest data). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Others: 1695.6 {I5} (1972Dz13), 1694.8 {I10} (1970Be48), 1694.87 {I4} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 2.2 {I8} (1972Dz13), 2.7 {I7} (1970Be48), 4.31 {I26} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2316.7 {I10} (1972Dz13), 2316.84 {I9} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 2.6 {I6} (1972Dz13), 0.78 {I7} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1837.3 {I8} (1972Dz13), 1837.94 {I4} (Budapest data) 
RI$other: 2.4 {I8} (1972Dz13), 2.36 {I16} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2780.57 {I5} (1990Is02), 2781.10 {I15} (1972Dz13), 2781.0 {I2} (1970Be48), 2780.8 {I4} (1970Sp02), 2780.552 {I22} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 74.4 {I21} (1990Is02), 62 {I7} (1972Dz13), 66 {I7} (1970Be48), 78 {I4} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 3534 {I1} (1972Dz13), 3534.0 {I10} (1970Be48), 3532.69 {I3} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 4.7 {I7} (1972Dz13), 1.9 {I4} (1970Be48), 1.94 {I13} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 3629.73 {I16} (1990Is02), 3630.7 {I4} (1972Dz13), 3630.2 {I3} (1970Be48), 3629.91 {I3} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 8.0 {I8} (1990Is02), 5.9 {I8} (1972Dz13), 6.5 {I7} (1970Be48), 8.8 {I4} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 4382 {I2}(1972Dz13), 4381.5 {I4} (1970Be48), 4382.03 {I3} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 1.6 {I3} (1972Dz13), 1.54 {I15} (1970Be48), 2.01 {I16} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$other: E|g=3586.22 {I4}, 7.5 {I20} (Budapest data). Value of |s{-|g} seems in serious disagreement with that from 1992Ra19, perhaps due to incorrect assignment of |g ray in these data. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 4528.75 {I7} (1990Is02), 4529.3 {I3} (1972Dz13), 4528.3 {I2} (1970Be48), 4528.78 {I3} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 15.3 {I6} (1990Is02), 13.2 {I14} (1972Dz13), 11.1 {I11} (1970Be48), 17.2 {I33} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5871.58 {I75} (1990Is02), 5873.2 {I5} (1970Be48), 5872.55 {I6} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 1.0 {I3} (1990Is02), 0.94 {I17} (1970Be48), 0.94 {I10} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1306.1 {I3} (1972Dz13), 1307 {I2} (1970Be48), 1306.01 {I3} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 16.9 {I19} (1972Dz13); 6.9 {I7} (1970Be48, discrepant data), 19.8 {I39} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 2205.14 {I21} (1990Is02), 2204.6 {I8} (1972Dz13), 2206.9 {I6} (1970Be48), 2205.2 {I3} (1970Sp02), 2204.945 {I25} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 13.9 {I21} (1990Is02), 11.3 {I19} (1972Dz13), 9.4 {I34} (1970Be48), 14.9 {I36} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 3054.32 {I5} (1990Is02), 3054.76 {I20} (1972Dz13), 3055.0 {I4} (1970Be48), 3054.3 {I5} (1970Sp02), 3054.321 {I23} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 76.3 {I19} (1990Is02), 67 {I7} (1972Dz13), 62 {I6} (1970Be48), 79.4 {I45} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$other: E|g=4270.15 {I9}, 0.04 {I4} (Budapest data) 
$1970Be48 report a |g with E|g=4259 {I2}, I|g=0.34 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$other: E|g=4892.06 {I4}, 0.06 {I6} (Budapest data) 
$1972Dz13 reported a 4903.1|g with I|g=0.94 {I19} but no such transition has been reported in any other study including 1992Ra19. It is possibly an impurity line in 1972Dz13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6586.39 {I25} (1990Is02), 6587.6 {I8} (1972Dz13), 6587.5 {I8} (1970Sp02), 6588.7 {I4} (1970Be48), 6586.64 {I3} (Budapest data) 
RI$others: 1.6 {I2} (1990Is02), 1.03 {I19} (1972Dz13), 1.54 {I15} (1970Be48), 1.72 {I16} (Budapest data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$1694.8 {I3} (1979De02) 
RI$original %I|g=10.5 {I30} (1979De02) 
$I|g(relative)=58.9 {I16} (1973Go22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1564.5 {I3} (1979De02) 
RI$original %I|g=6.2 {I20} (1979De02) 
$I|g(relative)=17.3 {I16} (1973Go22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$2316.7 {I4} (1979De02) 
RI$original %I|g=17 {I5} (1979De02) 
$I|g(relative)=72.8 {I18} (1973Go22) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$1973Go22 state it is unclear if the |g from this level which they detected is unambiguously from the decay of {+31}Al, 1979De02 do not report this state being populated 
RI$from I(2786.6|g)/I(2316.6|g)=3.6 {I15}/72.8 {I18} in 1973Go22 and I(2316.6|g)=30 {I9} (1979De02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$3627|g-752.6|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (1968Gi04) 
$2781.8|g-752.6|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1968Gi04), A{-2}=+0.015 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.026 {I21} (1968We07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 100 (1970Gr15, 1968Gi04) 
MR$weighted average of +4.7 {I10} (1968We07), and +4 {I1} (1968Gi04) 
$A{-2}=+0.49 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.23 {I4} weighted average of data from (1968Gi04, 1968We07) 
$1438.5|g-1694.8|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.52 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I8} (1968Gi04), A{-2}=+0.54 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.35 {I5}, or A{-2}=+0.53 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.29 {I3} (1968We07) 
$1694.8|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.46 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.36 {I15} (1968Gi04), A{-2}=+0.50 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.36 {I7}, or A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I3} (1968We07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 66 {I3} (1970Gr15), |?80 (1968Gi04) 
MR$1973Go02 obtain +0.41 {I22} and +1.34 {I+44-77} from measured |g|g(|q) and rule out the larger value based on |g-decay pattern and RUL. Other: +0.09 to +2.75 or -0.7 to -2.75 from 1968We07. 
$2317.3|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.41 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I10}, or A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} (1968We07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 100 (1970Gr15), 86 {I5} (1968We07) 
$2790.1|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I10} (1968Gi04), A{-2}=+0.01 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5}, or A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (1968We07) 
MR$weighted average of +0.20 {I5} (1968We07), +0.2 {I+1-2} (1968Gi04), for J(2790)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from 1968We07. Other: 0.0 {I1} (1968Gi04) 
$1438.5|g-1694.8|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.23 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I8} (1968Gi04), A{-2}=-0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I5} (1968We07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from %branching>85 in 1968We07. Other: 92 {I4} (1968Gi04) 
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) in 1973Go02. Other: -1.8 {I2} is also from |g|g(|q) in 1973Go02, but is ruled out by the authors based on RUL 
$2781.8|g-752.6|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} (1968Gi04), A{-2}=-0.390 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.045 {I13}, or A{-2}=-0.410 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.079 {I23} (1968We07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1941.4 {I3} from {+32}Al |b{+-} decay and 1942.12 {I9} from ({+22}Ne,2p|g). Other: 1930 {I31} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E,M$from ({++2}Ne,2p|g), with Mult based on |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) 
$E3 assigned in 2002AsZY, based on (5-) assignment for 5502 level, but E2 in 1997Fo01 based on 4+ assignment for 5502 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 
MR$<0.06 from RUL=3 for B(M2)(W.u.) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=4|*10{+-4} {I+5-2} if E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GE;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)<123 upper limit exceeds RUL=100 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)<155 upper limit exceeds RUL=100 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$(Q) assigned by the evaluator based on |g(|q) in 1972Pr18; (M2) ruled out by RUL 
RI$weighted average of 66 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 59 {I3} (1972Pr18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 88 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 90 {I4} (1972Pr18) 
MR$weighted average of -0.07 {I4} (1972Pr18) and -0.03 {I7} (1974Gu11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1972Pr18 
MR$from 1972Pr18 for J|p(5412)=1-. Other: 0.0 {I6} (1974Gu11) 
RI$weighted average of 79 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 83 {I4} (1972Pr18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 72 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 77 {I3} (1972Pr18) 
MR$from 1972Pr18 for J|p(5955)=2+. Other: +0.1 {I2} (1974Gu11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3042.6 {I12} (1984Gu19) and 3042.1 {I10} (1986Du07) 
RI$other: 74 {I20} (1984Gu19) 
$%I|g: other: 9.0 {I25} (1984Gu19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$rounded value from Adopted Gammas 
$Absolute intensity=22% {I5} per 100 decays of {+33}Al is deduced in 2019Li41,2017LiZZ using measured counts of {+33}Al decays and 1942 transition, but this value exceeds %|b{+-}n=8.5% measured in 2008ReZZ,1995ReZZ by a factor of |?2.6, which suggests either a much higher %|b{+-}n value for {+33}Al decay or an overcounted/incorrect intensity of 1942|g in 2019Li41,2017LiZZ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$not observed; from level-energy difference 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<0.053, from intensity limit of unobserved transition (2023Wi06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1997Fo01, not confirmed by 2002AsZY. It should be pointed out that 1997Fo01 used a much bigger (GASP) array for |g ray detection than the four-detector arrangement used by 2002AsZY. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1010.2 {I5} from {+33}Al |b{+-} decay, 1009.7 {I4} from {+34}Al |b{+-}n decay, 1010 {I1} from ({+34}Si,{+33}Si|g), and 1010 {I1} from ({+36}S,X|g). Other: 1010 {I7} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+34}Al |b{+-}n decay. Other: 1435 {I2} from ({+36}S,X|g) 
M$from analysis of in-plane to out-of-plane |g asymmetry in {+198}Pt({+37}Cl,X|g) (2002AsZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 1010.2 (2019Li41) 
RI$2.7 {I4}, relative to 3326|g in {+34}Al from {+34}Mg decay (2001Nu01); 4.4 {I15} per 100 {+34}Mg decays ({+34}Mg to {+34}Al to {+33}Si) (2019Li41) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from |b|g coin (2001Nu01). The authors deduced the intensity as 3.2 {I6} if 1193.3|g populated excited 0+ state at 2133 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this transition was also considered by 2001Nu01 as a possible but less likely candidate for a transition from 3326.8 keV to an uncertain 2133, (0+) state. But 2003Iw02 observe 1715|g in coin with 3326|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$intensity is too high by a factor of |?2 as compared to value in two other datasets and in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$ from detected energy sum=1688 {I2} in two telescopes, and subtraction of 9 keV {I1}, which is estimated as correction for energy losses in kapton foil and energy-angle correlations estimated by GEANT4 simulations 
$Monopole strength |r{+2}(E0)=0.013 {I9} (2012Ro25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(to 2719,0+)=0.0061 {I40} (2012Ro25) using B(E2)(2+ to 0+ g.s.)=0.0017 {I7} from 1998Ib01 
RI$ from I|g(3326)/I|g(607)=1380 {I717} (2102RoAA) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$this values agrees with 72 {I11} expected from 1894 {I185} number of protons in a peak at 906 keV {I32} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$No |g|g-coin evidence for its placement. 2023Lu07 mention that the 2316-keV peak was seen in both the NSCL and FRIB experiments from the decay of {+36}Al decay, but not from the decay of {+36}Mg. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement based on |g|g-coin evidence. 2023Lu07 mention that the 1109-keV peak was also seen in the decay of {+36}Mg in both the NSCL and FRIB experiments. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$most probable direct feeding to the first 2+ state based on the comparison of measured peak yield in |g|g-coin spectrum with expected value (2012Ta20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 172 {I5} in {+9}Be({+40}Si,{+39}Si|g) and 163 {I12} in {+9}Be({+40}P,{+39}Si|g),({+42}S,{+39}Si|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$given the observed width of the transition, it may be possible that it includes the decay of the triplet predicted by the shell model (2011So22). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$placement of this |g-ray is based on |g|g-coin with the 742 |g-ray. Also yield of this |g-ray is consistent with 100% feeding of the (2+) state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 242.5 {I40} from SeGA measurement and 246 {I5} from CAESAR measurement 
RI$branching from 244-keV level is I|g(80):I|g(244)=s100 {I13}:49 {I13} from SeGA measurement and 100 {I21} : 39 {I21} from CAESAR measurement. 2019Lo06 give a weighted average of the two values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$From ({+28}S,{+27}P|g) 
Measured E2 |g-decay width, (2.8|+0.5)E-5 eV, of the 1st excited state from an experiment of {+27}P beam on a lead target (2006To09). A total width of M1+E2 is estimated to be |G{-|g}=(1.3|+0.8)E-3 eV, combining the shell model calculation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1027 {I11} from multi-nucleon removal and 1025 {I9} from one-neutron knockout. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1137 {I6} from multi-nucleon removal and 1137 {I6} from one-neutron knockout. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1205 {I10} from multi-nucleon removal and 1205 {I5} from one-neutron knockout. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1523 {I9} from multi-nucleon removal and 1524 {I7} from one-neutron knockout. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1462 {I9} from multi-nucleon removal and 1464 {I7} from one-neutron knockout. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2213 {I11} from multi-nucleon removal and 2213 {I9} from one-neutron knockout. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of +0.29 {I3} (1974By01), +0.23 {I3} (1973Ba35), +0.23 {I3} (1971Fo02), and +0.16 {I5} (1970La17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$Weighted average of -0.14 {I3} (1974By01), -0.11 {I2} (1973Ba35), -0.17 {I5} (1970Mo29), and -0.09 {I9} (1970Wi10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 746 {I1} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 745.5 {I4} from ({+3}He,p|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.9 {I5} from ({+3}He,p|g) and 5.00 {I8} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1265 {I1} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 1264.4 {I3} from ({+3}He,p|g) 
M,MR$E2+M3 and |d=+0.01 {I2} in (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1974 {I1} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 1973.23 {I9} from ({+3}He,p|g) 
M,MR$E2+M3 and |d=-0.02 {I3} in (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 16 {I4} from ({+3}He,p|g) and 12.27 {I20} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=0.0 {I+2-3} in (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E A closer E|g=2174.5 {I18} has been placed from 5907 in (p,|g),(|a,n|g), the level not reported in ({+16}O,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 15 {I5} from ({+3}He,p|g) and 11.6 {I6} from (p,|g) 
M (Q) in ({+3}He,p|g) is not consistent for 3- to 2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI other: 9.9 {I9} ({+3}He,p|g) 
M$from decay scheme, D+Q in (p,|g),(|a,n|g) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.0|*10{+2} {I+6-7} upper bound exceeds RUL=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1714.7 {I17} ({+3}He,p|g) and 1716.1 {I17} (p,|g). 
RI Other: 83 {I15} ({+3}He,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q to 4+ with |d=+0.20 {I7} in (p,|g) is inconsistent, if J{+|p}=(2+). Note 8006|g D+Q to 1+ as well. The latter I|g is stronger. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
Pol=-0.48 {I22} (preliminary value communicated by e-mail on Sept 25, 2007, to XUNDL compiler from M. Saha Sarkar, possibly a magnetic transition) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1969Ha50, pol=+0.23 {I10}; it appears that 1969Ha50 could not be able to resolve this transition from that of 1483 keV transition decaying from 2937 keV level 
MR$-0.21 {I3} (1966Ha27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1969Ha50, pol=+0.43 {I14}; E1+M2 assignment by 1966Ha27; 1966Ha27 suggests for unusual E1-M2 mixing 
MR$0.10 {I1} (1966Ha27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1969Ha50 as E1+M2 based on pol=+0.44 {I22}. See the comments for J{+|p}(6269.2) in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from pol=+0.76 {I19} (1969Ha50); the evaluators' note: the sign of the extracted polarization value should be negative based on the assigned multipolarity of the transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E other: 678 {I2} (1966Ga16) 
RI$deduced from the reported |b{++} feeding to this level and |g-ray feeding from 3019-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1968Ve04 (combined branching with 1830 keV |g ray) 
M$Evaluators' note: this transition may be suspected due to implied high multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
MR$ -0.03 {I+19-29} or -4.5 {I+26-15} (1968Ve04); Evaluators' note: probably a typo in quoting the higher |d value in Table 2 of 1968Ve04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$evaluators' note: the assigned multipolarity is suspicious based on the assigned spin-parity of the feeding level; presence of this decay nullifies the possibility of J|pi=5- for the level as assigned in 2014McZZ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M$evaluators' note: the assigned multipolarity is suspicious based on the assigned spin-parity of the feeding level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1590.8 {I7} (2014McZZ), 1590.1 {I2} (2020Lo11) 
M$based on the DCO and |g(|q) data of 2020Lo11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E from 2020Lo11. Other: 3801.3 {I13} (2014Mc08,2014McZZ). Placement from 2014Mc08,2014McZZ consistent with earlier work. In 2020Lo11, 3801.9 {I9} |g is placed from 5775.9 (J|p=5+) keV level - shown as the same level as 5788.8 of literature, where it does not fit well. The placement in 2014Mc08,2014McZZ appears to be more consistent. The evaluators consider this placement and avoid to include 5775.9 as a new level in {+30}P. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1266.4 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1266.1 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.28 {I2} from (p,|g), +0.20 {I3} from (|g,|g'), and +0.25 {I15} from (p,p'|g), all from |g(|q) or |g|g(|q). Other: 0.34 {I3} from adopted B(E2)|^=0.070 {I8} and T{-1/2}=511 fs {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: I|g<0.1 in (|a,p|g), <0.2 in (p,|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0025 {I+5-4}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=12.0 {I+25-18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 2234.2 {I7} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 2233.5 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: <5.9 from {+31}S |e decay 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0129 {I+16-15}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=16.4 {I+21-20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$other: 3133 {I5} from (|g,|g') 
RI$other: 100.0 {I28} from {+31}S |e decay 
M$D+Q with multiple |d(Q/D) values from |g(|q) in (p,|g'), but 1/2 to 1/2 transition should be pure dipole; M1 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1061.6 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1061.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 1061.0 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 28.6 {I23} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 38 {I10} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), 28.2 {I12} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 19.1 {I24} from (|a,|g):resonances, 24 {I6} from (|a,p|g), and 26.5 {I13} from (p,|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.41 {I6} from (p,|g) and +0.38 {I9} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 2028.9 {I6} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 2028.6 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I6} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I14} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), 100.0 {I35} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 100.0 {I24} from (|a,|g):resonances, and 100 {I6} from (|a,p|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.44 {I2} (1966Ha20) and +0.42 {I4} (1969Wo01) from (p,|g), and +0.37 {I3} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3293.6 {I12} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 3294.7 {I7} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.08 {I19} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) and 1.41 {I26} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1180.9 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 1181.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.6 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 3.20 {I27} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 4.2 {I11} from (|a,p|g), and 2.5 {I5} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 2148.3 {I8} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 2148.6 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) and 100.0 {I11} from (|a,p|g) 
M$Q with |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g), ({+12}C,|ap|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M,MR$D(+Q) from (p,|g); M1(+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 67 {I11} from {+31}S |e decay, 56 {I6} from (|a,p|g), and 75 {I4} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from (p,|g); M1(+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (p,|g). Others: 100 {I6} from {+31}S |e decay (2.5534 s) and 100 {I6} from (|a,p|g) 
MR$other: |d(Q/D)=+0.40 {I3} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 37 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 31.6 {I26} from (|a,|g):resonances, 32 {I4} from (|a,p|g), and 34.7 {I28} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from (|a,p|g); M1(+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,|g):resonances. Others: 100 {I7} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 100 {I5} from (|a,p|g), and 100.0 {I28} from (p,|g) 
MR$others: -0.25 {I3} or -1.7 {I4} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (p,|g). Other: 100 {I6} from (|a,p|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.40 {I6} from (|a,p|g) and +0.32 {I4} from (p,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1016.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1016.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 8.4 {I14} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 8.6 {I11} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 7.3 {I18} from (|a,|g):resonances, 7.7 {I28} from (p,|g), and 13 {I5} from (|a,p|g) 
M$D with |DJ=0 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g), ({+12}C,|ap|g), and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
$B(M2)(W.u.)=2.5 {I+50-22} upper bound exceeds RUL=3 
E$weighted average of 1135.6 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1136.4 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 1135.7 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 64 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 72 {I10} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), 87 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 75 {I4} from (|a,|g):resonances, and 76 {I4} from (p,|g). Other: 109 {I9} from (|a,p|g) is discrepant 
M$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (p,|g); D with |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g), ({+12}C,|ap|g), and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1+M2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 2197.9 {I9} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 2197.0 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Other: 100 {I4} from (|a,|g):resonances, 100 {I9} from (|a,p|g), and 100 {I6} from (p,|g), 100 {I15} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) 
M$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (p,|g); D with |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1+M2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$other: 100 {I7} from (|a,p|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) for a doubly-placed 3336|g in (|a,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 31 {I5} from (|a,p|g) and 46 {I4} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D+Q with |d(Q/D)=-0.07 {I4} or -1.48 {I12} for 4630|g (1966Ha20) in (p,|g) may belong to this transition 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0039 {I+19-11}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.83 {I+39-24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1219.4 {I1} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1218.2 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 1218.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I7} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 100 {I9} from (|a,|g):resonances, 100 {I5} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I42} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) 
M,MR$|DJ=0 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g), ({+12}C,|ap|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1339.6 {I3} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1338.6 {I6} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 1338.7 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$others: 101 {I8} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 70 {I16} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), 96 {I8} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), and 92 {I8} from (|a,p|g); 167 {I18} from (|a,|g):resonances is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 68 {I8} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 88 {I10} from (|a,|g):resonances, 56 {I10} from (|a,p|g), and 72.7 {I28} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 10 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 7.7 {I26} from (|a,p|g), and 8.3 {I28} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$<11 from (p,|g) but from RUL expected value is 0.015, thus this transition most likely does not occur. |g not seen in ({+16}O,2|ap|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 74 {I7} from (|a,|g):resonances, 76 {I9} from (|a,p|g), and 73 {I5} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) and |d from (p,|g); M1+E2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 36 {I7} from (|a,|g):resonances, 41 {I7} from (|a,p|g), and 52 {I5} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D+Q with |d(Q/D)=+0.18 {I11} or -2.5 {I20} from (p,|g); M1+E2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.036 {I+24-11}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=24 {I+16-8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 29 {I7} from (|a,|g):resonances and 11 {I4} from (p,|g). Other: |<17 from (|a,p|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0060 {I+49-28}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.2 {I+18-10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: 33 {I7} from (|a,p|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0024 {I+11-6}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.75 {I+34-19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$other: 100 {I7} from (|a,p|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) and |d from (p,|g); (M1+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 25 {I13} from (|a,p|g) and 66 {I5} from (p,|g) 
RI$I|g from (|a,p|g) is inconsistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 40 {I7} from (|a,p|g) and 50 {I4} from (p,|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1927.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1928.4 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from (p,|g). Others: 100 {I6} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 100 {I20} from (|a,|g):resonances, and 100 {I5} from (|a,p|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); M1+E2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 8.6 {I12} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 9.8 {I25} from (|a,p|g), and 4.9 {I12} from (p,|g). Other: 42 {I16} from (|a,|g):resonances is discrepant 
M$Q from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) and p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3110.9 {I6} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 3109.4 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 10.3 {I11} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 14.0 {I9} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 12.2 {I25} from (|a,p|g), and 18.5 {I25} from (p,|g). Other: 58 {I16} from (|a,|g):resonances is discrepant 
M$Q from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) and p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 63 {I25} from (|a,|g):resonances, 20 {I10} from (|a,p|g), and 51 {I14} from (p,|g) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.6|*10{+2} {I+21-11} exceeds RUL=100 if pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 30 {I10} from (|a,p|g) and 34 {I12} from (p,|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.027 {I+21-11}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=48 {I+37-19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ({+12}C,|ap|g). 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Others: 100 {I38} from (|a,|g):resonances and 100 {I26} from (p,|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.026 {I+17-8}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=20 {I+14-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from (p,|g). Others: 38 {I13} from (|a,|g):resonances and 50 {I16} from (|a,p|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0033 {I+24-12}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2 {I+9-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 9.6 {I29} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 11.1 {I22} from (|a,p|g), and 8.7 {I33} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,p|g). Others: 100 {I8} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) and 100.0 {I33} from (p,|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 also from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 53 {I12} from (|a,p|g) and 27 {I9} from (p,|g) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.1|*10{+2} {I+11-5} exceeds RUL=100 if pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100 {I15} from (p,|g) 
M$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); M1+E2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1445.0 {I3} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1445.6 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 1442.7 {I8} from ({+12}C,|ap|g). Others: 1444.6 from (p,|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 42 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 50 {I8} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 13.6 {I34} from (|a,p|g) and 13 {I4} from (p,|g). Note that while values from (|a,p|g) and (p,|g) are consistent, and so are those from the other two studies, the two pairs of values are discrepant. The evaluators consider it is likely because the 3845|g from 6078 level is unresolved with the 3850|g from the 5116 level due to poor resolution in (p,|g) and (|a,p|g), and the 5116 level is however not populated in the more recent studies of ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g). 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3844.6 {I1} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 3846 {I4} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 3846.3 {I7} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Others: 100 {I9} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I8} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), and 100 {I13} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$D(+Q) and |d from (p,|g); probable Q component favors E2 by RUL. Other: -0.03 {I8} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1110.1 {I3} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1109.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 1110.5 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.9 {I9} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 13.1 {I28} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), 16.9 {I18} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), and 12 {I5} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3039.7 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 3038.9 {I19} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 3038.7 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Others: 100 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I29} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), 100 {I5} from (|a,p|g), and 100 {I12} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2071.5 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 2069.9 {I7} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 2070.4 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Others: 100 {I40} from (|a,|g):resonances, 100 {I20} from (|a,p|g), and 100 {I13} from (p,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Other: I|g=100 {I40} from (|a,|g):resonances and 100 {I20} from (|a,p|g) are discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2363.3 {I10} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 2365.0 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Others: 100 {I11} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I16} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) 
M,MR$from (|a,p|g). |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3381.6 {I16} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 3380.7 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I7} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), and 33 {I11} from (|a,p|g). Other: 114 {I32} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) is discrepant 
M$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); E1+M2 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments; M2 component unlikely from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1480.5 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1480.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 65.9 {I26} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), 67 {I17} from (|a,p|g), and 54 {I15} from (p,|g). Other: 114 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2394.0 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 2393.6 {I7} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 2393.0 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Others: 100 {I7} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I17} from (|a,p|g), and 100 {I23} from (p,|g) 
M$Q with |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 988.9 {I3} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 987.0 {I4} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 988.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). This |g is not seen in (|a,|g):resonances due to the high detector threshold (>2 MeV) 
RI$unweighted average of 36 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 18.9 {I19} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), and 9.9 {I22} from (|a,p|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) and |d from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); |DJ=0 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.092 to 2.7. 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<3234, upper limit exceeds RUL=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$reported in (|a,|g):resonances only. I(2807|g)=50 {I10} and I(4028|g)=40 {I10} reported in the level scheme in 1971De34, however, it looks from the gamma spectrum in Fig.2 of 1971De24 that the 2807|g peak is much weaker than the 4028|g peak. The evaluators consider this |g questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4027.8 {I3} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 4027 {I3} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 4026.6 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Others: 100 {I8} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 100 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g), and 100 {I25} from (|a,|g):resonances 
M$|DJ=2 also supported by |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$reported in (|a,|g):resonances only with I(5208|g)/I(4028|g)=10 {I5}/40 {I10}. It is identified by 1971De34 as a very broad single-escape peak with low statistics in the |g spectrum. The evaluators consider it questionable due to the poor resolution, lack of |g|g-coin data, non-observation in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1063.2 {I6} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1063.5 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 3428.2 {I17} with I|g=100 {I17} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) 
M$Q with |DJ=2 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g); M2 is less likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from (p,|g); E1 from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q with |d=-0.30 {I2} or +4.1 {I3} from (p,|g); (M1+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from (p,|g), (M1+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1883.7 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 1880.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 1881.3 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Others: 100 {I10} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 100 {I16} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) 
M,MR$D+Q with |DJ=1 and |d from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2205.3 {I15} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 2204.2 {I9} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 2203.6 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 4.7 {I8} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 9.5 {I21} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$it is E1+M2 from level scheme, but the strong M2 component is inconsistent with measured proton resonance strength and RUL. It is possible this transition could feed the 5014.9, (3/2+) level instead of 5015.2, 3/2- level as claimed by 2005Vo24 in (p,|g), if |d can be confirmed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
MR$other: -1.70 {I1} also from (p,|g) giving a large M2 component is unlikely based on measured proton resonance strength and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.023 {I+15-9}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=80 {I+60-40} 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=8|*10{+1} {I+6-4} upper bound exceeds RUL=100 if pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1733.4 {I7} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 1733.9 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 12.5 {I26} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 18 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g); E1+M2 from level scheme, but |d(M2/E1)<0.15 from RUL=3 for M2. 
$If M2, B(M2)(W.u.)=2.3|*10{+2} {I+13-7}, exceeds RUL=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2723.5 {I8} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 2722.3 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,p|g). Other: 100 {I8} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1870.6 {I9} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1871.1 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2860.6 {I12} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 2859.1 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3232 {I3} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 3233.4 {I7} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 745.8 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 744.7 {I2} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,2|ap|g). Other: 100 {I19} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) 
M$D from |DJ=0 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); M1 from |D|p=(no) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.19 to 16 
E$unweighted average of 2628.8 {I9} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 2625.7 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$<32 in ({+20}Ne,p|g). 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) with |DJ=1; E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
MR$other: -1.90 {I2} also from (p,|g) giving a large M2 component is unlikely based on measured proton resonance strength and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from |g(|q); (E1+M2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GE
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=8.0 to 392; upper bound exceeds RUL=100, implying |d(E2/M1)<0.15 
E$unweighted average of 1042.4 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 1041.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 52 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 25 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g) with |d(Q/D)|>+0.30. E1+M2 is ruled out by RUL. RUL=100 for E2, gives |d(E2/M1)<0.15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1511.4 {I6} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 1511.9 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.3 {I13} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 4.0 {I10} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0012 {I+8-5}. If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.4 {I+15-11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3392.3 {I7} from ({+20}Ne,p|g), 3394.8 {I11} from ({+12}C,|ap|g), and 3392.5 {I6} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,p|g). Others: 100 {I20} from ({+12}C,|ap|g) and 100 {I23} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
M$Q from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: D+Q in ({+20}Ne,p|g) is inconsistent 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1070.7 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 1069.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 57 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 43 {I5} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1815.9 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 1814.5 {I4} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,p|g) 
M$D with |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+20}Ne,p|g) and ({+16}O,2|ap|g); (E1) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 776.7 {I3} with I|g=100 {I17} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) 
M,MR$D+Q with |DJ=1 from |g|g(ADO) in ({+16}O,2|ap|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1080.9 {I6} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 1080.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 
RI$weighted average of 73 {I10} from ({+20}Ne,p|g) and 53 {I13} from ({+16}O,2|ap|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.16 {I2} (1958Br98) 
$A{-2}=-0.66 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} from E(p)=1392 resonance, A{-2}=-0.28 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I10} from E(p)=1400 resonance, A{-2}=-0.61 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} from E(p)=1509 resonance (1963Ha25) 
MR$-0.28 {I2} (1963Ha25), 0.28 {I2} (1968Wo01), 0.28 {I2} (1964Va11), -1.2 (1958Br98) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I2} (1958Br98) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} from E(p)=1204 resonance, A{-2}=+0.38 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} from E(p)=1489 resonance (1963Ha25) 
MR$0.0 (1967Wi10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I4} (1958Br98); A{-2}=+0.09 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I12}, or A{-2}=+0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} (1963Ha25) 
RI$other: 100 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$D+Q with |d(Q/D)=+0.22 {I2} or -3.0 {I2} (1963Ha25), -0.24 {I2} or +3.3 {I3} and -0.27 {I2} or +3.7 {I3} (1966Va08), but M1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I10} (1969Wo01) 
RI$others: 23 {I2} (1967Wi10), 23 {I2} (1966Ha20), 16 {I2} (1968Wo01), 18 {I5} (1966Va08) 
MR$-0.4 {I4} (1967Wi10), -0.41 {I6} (1966Ha20), +0.12 {I10} (1969Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.53 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} (1963Ha25); A{-2}=-+0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} (1969Wo01) 
$POL=-0.54 {I11} and -0.22 {I35} imply |p(3295)=+ (1967Wi10) 
RI$others: 77 {I2} (1967Wi10), 77 {I2} (1966Ha20), 84 {I2} (1968Wo01), 82 {I5} (1966Va08) 
MR$-0.44 {I2} (1966Ha20), -0.42 {I4} (1969Wo01), -0.32 {I8} or -0.55 {I+25-60} (1967Wi10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$POL=+0.65 {I23} implies |p(3415)=+ (1967Wi10) 
RI$others: 100 (1967Wi10), 90 (1962Ha33), 100 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 16 {I14} (1967Wi10), 16 {I4} (1966Ha20), <6 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.05 {I11} (1967Wi10), -0.05 {I105} (1966Ha20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 20 {I14} (1967Wi10), 20 {I14} (1966Ha20), 38 {I4} (1968Wo01) 
MR$+0.06 {I19} (1967Wi10), +0.06 {I19} (1966Ha20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.41 {I3} (1967Wi10), -0.41 {I3} (1966Ha20), -0.43 {I3} (1966Va08), +0.30 or -5.3 (1958Br98) 
$POL=-0.88 {I25} implies |p(3506)=+ (1967Wi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.12 {I3} (1958Br98) 
$A{-2}=+0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} from E(p)=1204 resonance, A{-2}=+0.50 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} from E(p)=1324 resonance, A{-2}=+0.61 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I8} from E(p)=1392 resonance (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 64 {I3} (1967Wi10), 64 {I3} (1966Ha20), 62 {I4} (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.8 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.3 {I2} (1963Ha25) 
$POL=+0.46 {I22} implies |p(4260)=+ (1967Wi10) 
RI$others: 20 {I3} (1967Wi10), 16 (1962Ha33), 20 {I3} (1966Ha20), 25 {I3} (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.25 (1967Wi10), -0.25 {I5} (1966Ha20); other solution of |d=+4.7 {I9} from 1966Ha20 ruled out by polarization 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 76 {I3} (1967Wi10), 84 (1962Ha33), 76 {I3} (1966Ha20), 75 {I3} (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.32 {I4} (1967Wi10), -0.32 {I4} (1966Ha20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1969Wo01) 
MR$-0.04 {I3} (1969Wo01) 
RI$other: 41 {I2} (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 54 {I5} (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$D+Q mixing ratio of -0.02 {I5} or -3.9 {I10} for 3360|g with I|g=52 {I4} from 4634 level in 1966Ha20 may belong to this transition. See comments for 3367.9|g from 4634 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 24 {I4} (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$D+Q mixing ratio of -0.07 {I4} or -1.48 {I12} for 4630|g with I|g=27 {I4} in 1966Ha20 may belong to this transition. See comments for 3367.9|g from 4634 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.45 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I12} (1969Wo01) 
RI$others: 21 {I6} (1966Ha20), 25 {I3} (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 52 {I4} (1966Ha20) with |d(E2/M1)=-0.02 {I5} or -3.9 {I10} likely misidentified from this level, but should be correspond to 3326|g from 4593 level, considering that 3368|g+3326|g is unresolved in 1966Ha20 with only a single broad peak shown in the |g spectrum, and that the discrepant branching ratio from 1966Ha20 matches the branching ratio of 3326|g seen and resolved in other studies. It is also the similar case for the 4630|g placed from this level in 1966Ha20. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 27 {I4} (1966Ha20) with |d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I4} or -1.48 {I12} likely misidentified from this level, but should be from 4593 level. See comments for 3367.9|g above. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1969Wo01 
RI$others: 70 (1962Ha33), 40 (1968Wo01) 
$1968Wo01 report a 40% branching for unknown transitions to other levels 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I14} (1969Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I10} (1969Wo01) 
MR$+0.03 {I8} or +3.3 {I13}; +0.04 {I4} or +3.2 {I5} (1969Wo01) 
RI$other: 55 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I11} and A{-2}=+0.51 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I12} (1969Wo01) 
MR$+0.15 {I14} or -0.34 {I32} (1969Wo01) 
RI$other: 75 {I4} (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 11 (1975De31), 11 (1968Wo01) 
MR$from 1964Va09. Others: -0.05 {I2} or +1.94 {I9} (1966Va08) (1964Va09) 
$A{-2}=-0.55 {I6} (1958Br98); A{-2}=-0.41 {I6} 
$POL=-0.60 {I25} (1964Va09) and POL=-0.63 {I27} (1966Va08) are used to determine J(3134)=1/2, with both |p=+ and |p=- possible 
$As mentioned in 1966Va08, the sign of POL in 1964Va09 is wrong 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 5 (1975De31), 6 (1968Wo01) 
$POL=-0.42 {I67} support |p(7782)=- (1966Va08) electric nature 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 27 (1975De31), 29 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=+0.44 {I2} (1958Br98) 
$POL=+0.71 {I32} implies |p(7782)=- (1966Va08), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 52 (1975De31), 48 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=-0.39 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}, POL=-0.56 {I26} (1966Va08); A{-2}=-0.41 {I2} (1958Br98); A{-2}=-0.49 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1979Ri01); A{-2}=-0.423 {I10}, POL=-0.35 {I27} (1964Va09) 
MR$from 1966Va08. Other: -0.02 from 1958Br98 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$others: 28 (1968Wo01), 24 (2005Vo24) 
M$|d(Q/D)=0 from |g|g(|q) in 1958Br98 
$A{-2}=+0.45 {I4} (1958Br98) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$other: 68 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I1} (1958Br98); A{-2}=-0.40 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} (1979Ri01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 11 (1968Wo01), 10 (2005Vo24), 10 (2005Vo24) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1958Br98 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I5} (1958Br98) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 60 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=-0.83 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1979Ri01); A{-2}=-0.72 {I2} (1958Br98) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.48 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I23} (1969Wo01) 
MR$-0.11 {I28} (1969Wo01) 
RI$other: 18 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 46 (1968Wo01), 65 (1964Va11) 
$A{-2}=-0.39 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I1} (1964Va11) 
MR$-0.010 {I4} (1964Va11). Other: +0.01 {I1} and +0.04 {I3} from |g|g(|q) from 1966Va08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I6} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 5 (1962Ha33), 4 (1968Wo01), 5 (1964Va11) 
MR$-0.11 {I3} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1964Va11); A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 31 (1962Ha33), 35 (1964Va11) 
MR$-0.05 {I2} (1963Ha25), -0.021 {I3} (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 44 (1962Ha33), 41 (1968Wo01), 48 (1964Va11) 
MR$-0.03 {I2} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$others: 24 (1962Ha33), 23(1968Wo01), 25 (1964Va11) 
$A{-2}=-0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} for doublet (1963Ha25) 
MR$<0.26 (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$POL=-0.8 {I4} implies |p(8461)=+ (1967Wi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I8} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 10 (1962Ha33), 13 (1968Wo01), 10 (1964Va11) 
M,MR$D+Q with |d=-0.11 {I3} from 1963Ha25; M1+E2 implied from |D|p=no based on POL in 1967Wi10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.46 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I8} (1963Ha25) 
$POL=+0.7 {I4} implies |p(3295)=+ based on |p(8461)=+ (1967Wi10) 
RI$others: 32 (1962Ha33), 28 (1968Wo01), 33 (1964Va11) 
M,MR$D(+Q) with |d=-0.01 {I5} from 1963Ha25; M1+E2 implied from |D|p=no based on POL in 1967Wi10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.56 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} (1964Va11); A{-2}=+0.61 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I7} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 27 (1962Ha33), 25 (1968Wo01), 27 (1964Va11) 
MR$-0.16 {I7} (1963Ha25), -0.100 {I11} (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1964Va11); A{-2}=-0.45 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 7 (1962Ha33), 4 (1968Wo01), 5 (1964Va11) 
MR$+0.02 {I3} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.55 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1964Va11) 
MR$+0.06 {I3} (1964Va11) 
RI$others: 29 (1968Wo01), 38 (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.01 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1964Va11) 
RI$others: 54 (1968Wo01), 71 (1964Va11) 
M$D+Q from 1964Va11; Q is not allowed by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1964Va11) 
MR$+0.30 {I2} or -4.1 {I3} (1964Va11) 
RI$other: 84 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.70 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I1} (1964Va11) 
MR$+0.114 {I7} or +1.38 {I2} (1964Va11) 
RI$other: 31 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.18 {I2} (1963Ha25) 
$POL=-0.49 {I21} implies |p(8576)=+ (1967Wi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I5} (1963Ha25) 
RI$other: 27 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
MR$0.04 {I5} (1963Ha25) 
$A{-2}=-0.48 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I13} (1963Ha25) 
$Level not reported in 1975De31. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.37 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} (1964Va11); A{-2}=-0.38 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1963Ha25) 
RI$other: 38 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.01 {I1} (1963Ha25), -0.004 {I4} (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 56 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1964Va11); no Mult deduced by 1964Va11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I23} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 7 (1962Ha33), 5 (1968Wo01) 
MR$from 1963Ha25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I12} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 13 (1962Ha33), 8 (1968Wo01) 
MR$from 1963Ha25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I6} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 15 (1962Ha33), 20 (1968Wo01) 
MR$from 1963Ha25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.48 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (1964Va11) 
$A{-2}=-0.49 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 51 (1962Ha33), 49 (1968Wo01) 
MR$+0.04 {I2} (1963Ha25), +0.042 {I3} (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I16} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 4 (1962Ha33), 2 (1968Wo01) 
MR$+0.29<|d<+1.8 (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I12} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 5 (1962Ha33), 3 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.10 {I6} or +5.6<|d<+14.3 (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1963Ha25) 
RI$11 (1975De31), 12 (1962Ha33), 13 (1968Wo01) 
MR$from 1963Ha25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I16} (1963Ha25) 
RI$0.9 (1975De31), 5 (1962Ha33), 1 (1968Wo01) 
MR$+0.28 {I5} or 1.85 {I20} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.47 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1964Va11); A{-2}=+0.53 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 72 (1962Ha33), 73 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.043 {I3} (1963Ha25), -0.050 {I5} or +1.97 {I3} (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.41 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1964Va11); A{-2}=-0.44 {I2} (1963Ha25) 
RI$other: 80 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.04 {I1} or 1.91 {I5} (1963Ha25), -0.022 {I5} or +1.83 {I3} (1964Va11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: <4 (1962Ha33), 2 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.41 {I15}, A{-6}=+0.14 {I17} (2009Ka37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 3 (1962Ha33), 5 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I8}, A{-6}=+0.06 {I9} (2009Ka37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 9 (1962Ha33), 14 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) (1964Va11) 
$A{-2}=+0.40 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I10}, A{-6}=+0.11 {I9} (2009Ka37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1964Va11) 
MR$from 1964Va11 
RI$others: 4 (1962Ha33), 2 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 68 (1962Ha33), 68 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=-0.46 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1964Va11); A{-2}=-0.47 {I2} (1963Ha25); A{-2}=+0.25 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I12}, A{-6}=+0.009 {I13} (2009Ka37) 
MR$-0.02 {I2} or +1.83 {I7} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.19 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I24} (2005Vo24) 
MR$from 2005Vo24 
RI$others: 5 (1968Wo01), 4 (2005Vo24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I18} (2005Vo24) 
RI$others: 14 (1962Ha33), 13 (1968Wo01), 13 (2005Vo24) 
MR$from 2005Vo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.01 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I14} (2005Vo24); A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 8 (1962Ha33), 12 (1968Wo01), 12 (2005Vo24) 
MR$2005Vo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4} (2005Vo24) 
RI$others: 35 (1962Ha33), 37 (1968Wo01), 37 (2005Vo24) 
MR$+0.24 {I6} (2005Vo24). Other: +0.08 {I5} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.19 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I9} (2005Vo24) 
RI$others: 12(1962Ha33), 8 (1968Wo01), 9 (2005Vo24) 
MR$-4.0 {I15} (1963Ha25), -20 {I14} (2005Vo24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I10} (2005Vo24); A{-2}=+0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 12 (1962Ha33), 9 (1968Wo01), 8 (2005Vo24) 
MR$+0.8 {I4} (2005Vo24). Other: +0.21 {I4} (1963Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.47 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I11} (2005Vo24); A{-2}=+0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 8 (1962Ha33), 8 (1968Wo01), 7 (2005Vo24) 
MR$-0.01 {I3} or -3.6 {I4} (1963Ha25), -1.2 {I6} (2005Vo24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.41 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} (2005Vo24) 
RI$others: <5 (1962Ha33), 4 (1968Wo01), 4 (2005Vo24) 
MR$from 2005Vo24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from A{-2}=+0.10 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1963Ha25) 
$POL=-0.5 {I3} implies |p(8757)=+ (1967Wi10) 
RI$others: 28 (1962Ha33), 26 (1968Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.55 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I6} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 10 (1962Ha33), 7 (1968Wo01) 
MR$1963Ha25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (1964Va11). Other: A{-2}=+0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I2} (1963Ha25) 
RI$others: 56 (1962Ha33), 55 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.25 {I2} (1963Ha25), -0.206 {I3} (1964Va11). The value from 1964Va11 seems to be from |g|g(|q) data with A{-2}=-0.76 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 47 (1968Wo01) 
MR$0.12 {I7} or 2.4 {I5} from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.32 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 11 {I2} (1967Wi10), 14 (1968Wo01) 
MR$-0.02 {I4}, +0.16 {I8} or +0.03 {I5} from |g|g(|q) in 1967Wi10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 36 {I1} (1967Wi10), 35 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 17 {I1} (1967Wi10), 18 (1968Wo01) 
MR$0.255 {I5} or 1.02 {I1} from 1966Va07 
$A{-2}=-0.79 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 6 (1968Wo01, 6 (2004Vo22) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.65 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 11 (1968Wo01), 13 (2004Vo22) 
M$from 1966Va07 
$A{-2}=+0.50 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.38 {I2} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 90 (1968Wo01) 
MR$0.008 {I5} or 1.70 {I1} from 1966Va07 
$A{-2}=-0.47 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 10 (1968Wo01) 
M$1966Va07 proposed Q, |DJ=2 based on |g|g(|q) which, however, could be also consistent with |DJ=0 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I7} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.27 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I16} (1969Wo01) 
RI$others: 5 (1968Wo01), 3 (2004Vo22) 
M,MR$1969Wo01 report that |d is small if J(5530)=7/2, |d=+0.52 {I12} if J(5530)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 37 (1968Wo01), 42 (2004Vo22) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 48 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I8} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 51 (1968Wo01), 49 (2004Vo22) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 26 (1968Wo01), 18 (2004Vo22) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.45 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I10} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 36 (1968Wo01), 29 (2004Vo22) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$A{-2}=-0.42 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$other: 47 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I10} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$other: 11 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I10} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-0.250 {I5} or 3.48 {I5} from 1966Va07 
RI$other: 69 (1968Wo01) 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 8 {I1} (1988Va06), 13 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from 1988Va06. Other: +0.16 {I7} (1966Va07) 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.26 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I11} (1966Va07); 
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I2} (1988Va06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 53 {I3} (1988Va06), 57 (1968Wo01) 
M,MR$from 1988Va06. Other: -0.088 {I5} or 2.15 {I1} (1966Va07) 
$A{-2}=-0.32 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I1} (1966Va07); A{-2}=-0.36 {I2} (1988Va06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1966Va07 
RI$other: 81 (1968Wo01) 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.38 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I8} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$|d=0.12 {I4} or -2.3 {I2} from 1966Va07 
RI$other: 58 (1968Wo01) 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} (1966Va07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1968Bo13) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.27 {I1} or +3.75 {I12} (1968Bo13), with preference for the lower value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1968Bo13) 
$A{-2}=+0.01 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I12}, A{-6}=+0.08 {I13} (2009Ka37) 
MR$-0.24 {I1} or +3.43 {I3} (1968Bo13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.07 {I3} or -2.05 {I15} from |g|g(|q) (1968Bo13) 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I13}, A{-6}=+0.005 {I14} (2009Ka37) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.49 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1968Bo13) 
MR$+0.02 {I1} or +1.64 {I2} (1968Bo13) 
RI$intensity of |g-rays from the doublet not separated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I5} and A{-2}=+0.15 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I2} from different detector positions in 1969Wi02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.628 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.105 {I13} and A{-2}=-0.363 {I15}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} from different detector positions in (1969Wi02) for complex resonance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1961Mc08 
M,MR$from |g(|q,pol) in 1961Mc08 
$POL=+1.08 {I8} at E{-p}=2.70 MeV, +0.38 {I13} at E{-p}=2.98 MeV (1961Mc08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$2021To09 report a branching of 37.0 {I1}, but the uncertainty is unrealistically small 
$2021To09 report |d(Q/D)=-0.03 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
RI$2021To09 report a branching of 58.1 {I1}, but the uncertainty is unrealistically small 
$2021To09 report |d(Q/D)=-0.03 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 assumed by 1974Tw01 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I4} and +0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I5} and -0.26 {I7}; mult not assigned. |g(|q) data are given for a 2234|g with both the 5892 and 6081 levels, however these levels do not de-excite via a 2234|g. The evaluator tentatively assigns these angular distributions here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 assumed by 1974Tw01 
$2149|g shown with 6452, 7118 and 7441 levels, however this |g must belong to this transition. A{-2}=+0.50 {I5}, +0.51 {I2}, +0.43 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I3}, -0.21 {I2}, -0.15 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} and A{-2}=+0.12 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I7}. Mult=E1 estimated by 1974Tw01 but not adopted by evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} and A{-2}=-0.22 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.33 {I20}. Mult=E1 estimated by 1974Tw01 but not adopted by evaluators 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-1.01 {I26}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I33} at 10 MeV; A{-2}=-0.24 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} at 17 MeV 
MR$from +0.6<|d<+2.7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.20 {I3}, +1.12 {I8}, -0.90 {I6} or -5.0 {I8} from |g(|q) (1963Le16), but only -0.20 is consistent with other measurements. 
$A{-2}=0.638 (1963Le16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.057 {I7} (1969Ra20); |d(E2+M1) is found to be in agreement with 0.41 {I3} from 1967Wi10 in (p,|g). |g(|q) consistent with |DJ=2 (1963Le16); identically zero for this sequence. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|G{-|g0}/|G{-|g}=0.84 {I4} (1972Sh07). 
M,MR$|g(|q) is isotropic; +0.15<|d<0.40, -2.5>|d>-6.5 (1965Hi09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 78.2 {I1} from (|a,p|g), 78.099 {I25} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 78.1 {I1} from (K{+-},x ray|g). Other: 78.2 {I10} from ({+16}O,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 86.1 {I26} from (|a,p|g) and 79.3 {I88} from (|m{+-},|g). Other: 80 {I20} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 15.1 {I14} from (|a,p|g), 11.8 {I28} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 13.2 {I13} from (|m{+-},|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0055 {I6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=17.8 {I20} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1245.1 {I10} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 1244.764 {I39} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 68.4 {I17} from (|a,p|g), 63 {I16} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 63 {I7} from (|m{+-},|g). Other: 88.7 {I19} from ({+16}O,pn|g) is discrepant 
MR$another solution -8 {I+3-11} also from |g|g(|q) in (|a,p|g) (1973Va14); the small value is adopted by the evaluator considering that the large |d would require a much larger B(E2) and is probably disfavored by RUL, compared to the small value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1323.1 {I10} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 1322.850 {I38} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Others: 100.0 {I19} from ({+16}O,pn|g), 100 {I24} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 100 {I11} from (|m{+-},|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g(anisotropy) in ({+16}O,pn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.04 {I10} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 2.09 {I21} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1677.1 {I10} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 1676.992 {I45} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100.0 {I21} from ({+16}O,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 1.02 {I10} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 2.2 {I5} from (|a,p|g) 
M$|d(O/Q)=0.0 {I3} from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 3.41 {I31} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 9.9 {I10} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 67.0 {I32} from (|a,p|g), 53 {I13} (1989Mi16) and 45.3 {I25} (1997Ka15) from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
RI$weighted average of 19 {I4} from (|a,p|g) and 20.9 {I27} from (n,|g) E=thermal (1997Ka15) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0116 {I+23-19} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=43 {I+9-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
RI$weighted average of 26 {I4} from (|a,p|g) and 22.8 {I25} from (n,|g) E=thermal (1997Ka15) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00168 {I+31-25} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.57 {I+29-23} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100 {I15} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.08 {I+8-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=8|*10{+1} {I+7-3} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: 24 {I4} from (|a,p|g) is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0045 {I+45-17} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.8 {I+39-15} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 28.2 {I26} from (|a,p|g) and 34 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.033 {I+17-9} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=21 {I+11-6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100 {I15} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
RI$other: <13.5 from (|a,p|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0060 {I+41-20} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=10 {I+7-3} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 35 {I6} from (|a,p|g), 38.6 {I21} (1997Ka15) and 32 {I5} (1989Mi16) from (n,|g) E=thermal 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.019 {I+12-6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=11 {I+7-3} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 44.6 {I18} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 34.0 {I5} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 25.0 {I18} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 22.6 {I10} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 23.4 {I21} from (|a,p|g), 17.7 {I3} (1997Ka15) and 18 {I5} (1989Mi16) from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 26.5 {I18} from (|a,p|g), 26.4 {I5} (1997Ka15) and 28 {I8} (1989Mi16) from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 47 {I5} from (|m{+-},|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 38.8 {I25} from (|a,p|g), 35.4 {I6} (1997Ka15) 37 {I10} (1989Mi16) from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 19.0 {I30} from (|m{+-},|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$from 1997Ka15 in (n,|g) E=thermal. Others: 100.0 {I34} from (|a,p|g), 100 {I15} from 1989Mi16 in (n,|g) E=thermal, 100 {I10} from (|m{+-},|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 32 {I5} from (|a,p|g), 26.4 {I9} (1997Ka15) and 24.6 {I12} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 37 {I4} from (|m{+-},|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 7.0 {I21} from (|a,p|g), 3.4 {I5} (1997Ka15) and 5.01 {I25} (1989Mi16) from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 1.83 {I31} from ({+16}O,pn|g) and 6.4 {I13} from (|a,p|g) 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 
$B(M2)(W.u.)<10 upper limit exceeds RUL=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100.0 {I26} from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g(anisotropy) in ({+16}O,pn|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme. Other: |d(Q/D)=-0.05 {I3} from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 43 {I8} from (|a,p|g) and 70 {I18} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0031 {I+27-12} if E1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.102 {I+87-39} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.9|*10{+2} {I+24-11} exceeds RUL=100 if pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: 112 {I10} from (|a,p|g) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=2.9|*10{+-4} {I+25-10} if E1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0093 {I+80-33} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.5 {I+30-12} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: 100 {I12} from (|a,p|g) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=2.8|*10{+-4} {I+24-10} if E1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0093 {I+79-32} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.3 {I+29-12} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from 1997Ka15 in (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 108 {I27} (1973Ca18) in (n,|g) E=thermal; 50 from (|a,p|g) 
MR$deduced by the evaluator based on RUL=100 for B(E2)(W.u.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,p|g). Other: 100 {I7} from (n,|g) E=thermal (1997Ka15) 
M$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I16} from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
M$other: M1, |DJ=1 from |g(anisotropy) and |g(pol) in ({+16}O,pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$other: 30 {I16} from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0029 {I+10-8} if E1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.094 {I+31-26} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=269 {I+94-75} exceeds RUL=100 if pure E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,pn|g) 
RI$other: 17.7 {I24} from ({+16}O,pn|g) is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)>0.012 if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)>117 exceeds RUL=100 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00122 {I+51-33} if E1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.040 {I+17-11} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=83 {I+35-23} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from ({+3}He,p|g) (1971Ad06,1972Fo12). Other: 2.80 {I16} from (n,|g) E=thermal (1989Mi16) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 38.9 {I13} (1997Ka15) and 37 {I9} (1989Mi16) in (n,|g) E=thermal 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.222 {I+38-29} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.4|*10{+2} {I+8-6} exceeds RUL=100 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 94 {I1} (1973Ca18), 94 {I1} (1970Va12) 
MR$others: 0.45 {I6} (1970Mo09), -0.84 {I2} (1971St33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.08 {I5} for J(4743)=5, but the mixture of either M2+E3 or E2+M3 is ruled out by RUL, therefore it could be only pure E2 for J=5 since M2 is also ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$6.6 {I8} (1971Ad06) and 5.3 {I9} (1972Fo12) 
$I(2840|g)/I(3920)|g=7.20 {I95}/100, weighted average of 6.6 {I8}/85.6 {I18} (1971Ad06) and 5.3 {I9}/84.0 {I85} (1972Fo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$7.8 {I14} (1971Ad06) and 10.7 {I14} (1972Fo12) 
$I(5070|g)/I(3920)|g=10.5 {I18}/100, weighted average of 7.8 {I14}/85.6 {I18} (1971Ad06) and 10.7 {I14}/84.0 {I85} (1972Fo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from measurements with {+35}Cl and {+37}Cl targets (1972Wi04) 
RI$yield for 100 stopped kaons with {+35}Cl target. Others: 4 per stopped 100 kaons for {+37}Cl target and 1 for {+32}S target (1972Wi04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1431.8 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 1431.6 {I3} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), 1431.8 {I2} from (|a,p|g), and 1431.5 {I3} from (t,p|g) 
M$also from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
MR$weighted average of -0.63 {I17} (1968Mo16) and -0.58 {I11} (1969Ha40) in (|a,p|g), and -0.58 {I+25-30} in (1970Ha48) in (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 416.1 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 415.9 {I2} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 416.3 {I3} from (t,p|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Others: 6.7 {I6} from {+33}Si |b{+-} decay, 10.0 {I30} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 6.4 {I21} from (|a,p|g), and 8.7 {I22} from (t,p|g) 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); M1+E2 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1847.8 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 1847.5 {I3} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), 1847.9 {I2} from (|a,p|g), and 1847.52 {I16} from (t,p|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Others: 100.0 {I10} from {+33}Si |b{+-} decay, 100.0 {I20} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 100.0 {I21} from (|a,p|g), and 100.0 {I22} from (t,p|g) 
M$|d(O/Q)=-0.06 {I4} or -2.4 {I3} from p|g(|q) in (|a,p|g) and (t,p|g); O component (E3 or M3) is ruled out by RUL; E2 also from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.12 {I+8-4} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.0|*10{+3} {I+7-3} exceeds RUL=100 if E2 
E$weighted average of 690.4 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 691.0 {I4} from (t,p|g) 
RI$other: 31 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.09 {I+8-4} if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.9|*10{+2} {I+26-15} exceeds RUL=100 if E2 
E$other: 1106.4 {I15} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
RI$other: 40.4 {I21} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2539.2 {I20} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 2539.7 {I5} from (|a,p|g), and 2537.3 {I5} from (t,p|g) 
RI$also from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M,MR$from (|a,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.027 {I+8-5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=54 {I+15-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0021 {I+6-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.79 {I+22-14} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 1643.0 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1642.6 {I4} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Others: 100 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 100 {I25} from (|a,p|g), and 100 {I6} from (t,p|g) 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$deduced from -0.27<|d<+2.1 (1973Po03) in (t,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2058.8 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 2058.5 {I8} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 2058.9 {I4} from (t,p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 64 {I12} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 73.6 {I25} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 90 {I6} from (t,p|g), and 67 {I25} from (|a,p|g) 
MR$weighted average of -0.14 {I10} from (|a,p|g) and -0.37 {I28} from (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$B(M3)(W.u.) upper limit exceeds RUL=10 
E$weighted average of 3490.9 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 3490.1 {I10} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 9.0 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 13.4 {I15} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 14 {I4} from (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1780.3 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 1780.1 {I6} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 1779.3 {I8} from (t,p|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 57.7 {I23} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 45 {I5} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), 43 {I29} from (|a,p|g), and 43 {I4} from (t,p|g) 
MR$from (|a,p|g). Others: +0.01 {I8} or -0.05 {I+7-11} from (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2196.5 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 2196.0 {I8} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 2195.8 {I10} from (t,p|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,p2n|g). Others: 100 {I5} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), 100 {I29} from (|a,p|g), and 100 {I4} from (t,p|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+18}O,p2n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. |d(O/Q)=0.0 {I1} from (|a,p|g) and +0.03 {I13} from (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Considered as unlikely transition by the evaluators as implied Mult=M3 is not allowed by RUL 
$B(M3)(W.u.) upper limit exceeds RUL=10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0052 {I+34-21} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=9 {I+6-4} if E2 
E$other: 1509.9 {I19} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 5.6 {I14} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 14 {I5} from (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$other: 2616.2 {I21} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
RI$from ({+18}O,p2n|g). Other: 100 {I5} from (t,p|g) 
MR$from (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=0.64 {I+32-16} if E2 
$B(M3)(W.u.)=2.5|*10{+5} {I+13-7} exceeds RUL=10 if M3 
M$Q(+O) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); M2+E3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 736.0 {I5} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 735.6 {I3} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 734.7 {I2} from (|a,p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 8.58 {I34} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 8.90 {I20} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 12.4 {I23} from (|a,p|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+18}O,p2n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2378.7 {I9} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 2378.2 {I5} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), 2378.5 {I2} from (|a,p|g), and 2377.0 {I7} from (t,p|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Others: 100.0 {I21} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 100.0 {I23} from (|a,p|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2794.6 {I13} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 2794.1 {I13} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 0.85 {I21} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1.20 {I20} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 3008.5 {I25} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
MR$-0.40<|d<0.40 or 2.5<|d<11.4 for J(4856)=5/2 (1973Po03) in (t,p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>4.7|*10{+-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.3 if E2 
RI$other: I(2514.7|g)/I(3206.0|g)=0.3 {I1}/2.5 {I2}=9 {I3}/71 {I6} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) is in agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3206.5 {I25} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 3205.7 {I17} from (t,p|g) 
RI$other: I(3623.8|g)/I(3206.0|g)=1.3 {I2}/2.5 {I2}=37 {I6}/71 {I6} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)>4.6|*10{+-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>0.14 if E2 
RI$other: I(3623.8|g)/I(3206.0|g)=1.3 {I2}/2.5 {I2}=37 {I6}/71 {I6} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) is in agreement within uncertainties 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$this transition is only seen and reported as the strongest one from the 5050 level in 1973Po02 and 1973Po03 in (t,p|g), but not seen in other studies including a recent measurement of ({+18}O,p2n|g) by 2018Lu08, who however have seen 2514.7|g, 3206.5|g, and 3206.5|g from this 5050 level that are reported in 1973Po02 and 1973Po03 but didn't address the non-observation of the 5058|g in their work. It is probable that the high energy of this transition is out of the detection range in other studies. 
M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in 1973Po03; |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$deduced from -1.8<|d<0.02 (1973Po03) in (t,p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3757.8 {I25} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 3758.8 {I29} from (t,p|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I22} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M,MR$D(+Q) from (t,p|g) for J(5191)=5/2; |D|p=no from level scheme 
$B(E2)(W.u.) upper limit exceeds RUL=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3558.6 {I25} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 3557.4 {I28} from (t,p|g) 
M,MR$+0.01<|d(Q/D)<+0.51 for J(5407)=7/2 from (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme. |DJ=1 from |g(|q) in ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1226.5 {I6} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 1226.3 {I3} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), 1226.6 {I2} from (|a,p|g), and 1226.0 {I5} from (t,p|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Other: 100.0 {I22} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M$from p|g(|q) and |g|g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.9 {I1} in (|a,p|g) and +1.0 {I2} in ({+13}C,|apn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1825.3 {I8} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1824.4 {I4} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.1 {I3} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 8.7 {I2} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+18}O,p2n|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3605.8 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 3604.5 {I15} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1.3 {I4} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1276.7 {I18} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1274.5 {I5} from (t,p|g) 
RI$other: I(1274.7|g)/I(3652.8|g)=77 {I15}/100 {I23} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) is discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 186.0 {I8} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 185.4 {I6} from (|a,p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 73 {I4} from ({+18}O,p2n|g), 79.9 {I18} from ({+13}C,|apn|g), and 85 {I4} from (|a,p|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+18}O,p2n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,p|g). Others: 1412.3 {I7} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1411.9 {I4} from ({+13}C,|apn|g); 1420.8 {I30} from (t,p|g) is discrepant 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Others: 100.0 {I24} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 100 {I4} from (|a,p|g) 
M$from p|g(|q) and |g|g(lin pol) in (|a,p|g) and also |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1170 {I1} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 1168.6 {I8} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Other: 100 {I40} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2586.2 {I30} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 2581.6 {I10} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Other: 80 {I30} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M1))
decay_comment:
E$other: 1298.1 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=-18 {I10} from 1298|g-1412|g(|q) and -2.6 {I29} from 2091|g-1298|g(|q) for J(6936)=13/2 in ({+13}C,|apn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=2090.7 {I15}, I|g=50 {I25} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) in ({+13}C,|apn|g) for J(9078)=11/2 or 15/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2141.6 {I10} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 2141.8 {I7} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Other: 100 {I50} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g=1028.0 {I10}, I|g=100 {I40} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) in ({+13}C,|apn|g) for J(10106)=13/2 or 17/2; |DJ=1 from |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3170.3 {I19} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) and 3169.4 {I12} from ({+13}C,|apn|g) 
RI$from ({+13}C,|apn|g). Other: 29 {I14} from ({+18}O,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+D)
decay_comment:
MR$+9.9 {I42} for J(6936)=9/2 and -18 {I10} for J(6936)=13/2 from 1298|g-1412|g(|q). The values are +1.7 {I60} and -2.6 {I29}, respectively, from 2091|g-1298|g(|q) from 9078 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.1 {I1} from 2091|g-1298|g(|q) for J(9078)=11/2 and J(6936)=9/2, or J(9078)=15/2 and J(6936)=13/2. The values are +0.2 {I4} and -2.6 {I30}, respectively, from 1028|g-2091|g(|q) from 10105 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.1 {I1} from 1028|g-2091|g(|q) for J(10105)=13/2 and J(9078)=11/2, or J(10105)=17/2 and J(9078)=15/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2002Mo29 
RI$in 2017LiZZ (priv. comm.), absolute I|g=78 {I16} in contrast to 5.1% {I5} in 2002Mo29 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Note that the strongest transition from 3275 level as shown in Fig.2 of 1973Go33 taken from 1973Po02 is 1429|g to 1848 level, which is not reported by 1973Go33 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
$Note that the strongest transition from 5048 level as shown in Fig.2 of 1973Go33 taken from 1973Po02 is 5048|g to ground state, which is not reported by 1973Go33 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1432.1 {I10} (2009Ch43) 
$I|g(rel)=64.2 {I1} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 1.3 by evaluators), >19 (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.89 {I15} gate on 736|g, |DJ=1, POL=-0.022 {I20} gate on 416|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 416.4 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 416.0 {I4} (2018Lu08). Other: 414 (2007LiZN) 
RI$unweighted average of 6.95 {I22} (2009Ch43) and 13.0 {I3} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=13.0 {I1} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 0.3 by evaluators), 6.95 {I22} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.87 {I14} gate on 2379|g, |DJ=1, POL=-0.188 {I29} gate on 1432|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
$Others: E|g=1848.1 {I10}, I|g=100.0 {I30} (2009Ch43); 1848 (2007LiZN) 
$I|g(rel)=100.0 {I1} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 2.0 by evaluators), 100 {I3} (2009Ch43). 
$2379|g-1848|g(|q) from 4227 level gives DCO=1.76 {I34} and POL=+0.050 {I20} for 1848|g, DCO=0.48 {I10} and POL=+0.017 {I15} for 2379|g, which is consistent with |DJ=2, stretched Q for 1848|g and |DJ=1, stretched D for 2379|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1642.7 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 1643.2 {I10} (2018Lu08). Other: 1643 (2007LiZN) 
RI$from 2009Ch43. Other: 100 {I13} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=2.3 {I3} (2018Lu08), 6.93 {I25} (2009Ch43). 
M$Q assignment in 2009Ch43 is considered by the evaluators as incorrect, recalling that DCO for |DJ=2, Q will be the same as for |DJ=0, dipole. 
$DCO=2.0 {I3} gate on 736|g, |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from 2009Ch43. Other: 2058.7 {I12} (2018Lu08) 
RI$unweighted average of 75.8 {I28} (2009Ch43) and 52 {I9} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=1.2 {I2} (2018Lu08), 5.25 {I19} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.91 {I15} gate on 736|g, |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3491.1 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 3490.4 {I14} (2018Lu08) 
RI$from 2009Ch43. Other: 13 {I9} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=0.3 {I2} (2018Lu08), 0.62 {I3} (2009Ch43). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1780.5 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 1779.9 {I13} (2018Lu08) 
RI$weighted average of 58.5 {I23} (2009Ch43) and 54 {I5} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=7.3 {I7} (2018Lu08), 3.86 {I15} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.38 {I7} gate on 1848|g, |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 2009Ch43. Other: E|g=2196.3 {I15}, I|g=100 {I4} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=13.5 {I4} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 0.5 by evaluators), 6.60 {I21} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=1.9 {I3} gate on 186|g, |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 736.2 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 735.9 {I5} (2018Lu08) 
RI$weighted average of 8.42 {I28} (2009Ch43) and 9.3 {I6} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=4.4 {I3} (2018Lu08), 8.25 {I27} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.73 {I12} gate on 1848|g, |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2378.8 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 2378.6 {I9} (2018Lu08) 
RI$from 2018Lu08. Other: 100.0 {I31} (2009Ch43) 
$I|g(rel)=47.3 {I4} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 1.0 by evaluators), 98 {I3} (2009Ch43). 
$|DJ=1 from DCO=0.48 {I10} gate on 1848|g, POL=+0.017 {I15} gate on 1848|g. See comments for 1848|g from 1848 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1226.8 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 1226.4 {I6} (2018Lu08). Other: 1226 (2007LiZN) 
RI$other: 100.0 {I32} (2009Ch43) 
$I|g(rel)=27.5 {I3} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 0.6 by evaluators), 50.2 {I16} (2009Ch43). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1825.1 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 1825.4 {I8} (2018Lu08) 
RI$weighted average of 9.32 {I30} (2009Ch43) and 8.7 {I4} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=2.4 {I1} (2018Lu08), 4.68 {I15} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.49 {I9} gate on 1848|g, |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3606.0 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 3605.1 {I16} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=0.4 {I1} (2018Lu08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 186.2 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 185.9 {I8} (2018Lu08). Other: 185 (2007LiZN) 
RI$unweighted average of 69.5 {I25} (2009Ch43) and 76.8 {I19} (2018Lu08) 
$I|g(rel)=15.9 {I2} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 0.4 by evaluators), 33.2 {I12} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.67 {I15} gate on 1848|g, |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1412.6 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 1412.2 {I7} (2018Lu08). Other: 1411 (2007LiZN) 
RI$other: 100.0 {I34} (2009Ch43) 
$I|g(rel)=20.7 {I3} (2018Lu08, uncertainty adjusted to 0.5 by evaluators), 47.8 {I16} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.94 {I15} gate on 1848|g, |DJ=2, POL=+0.048 {I10} gate on 1848|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2009Ch43, unplaced by authors. Placement from 2018Lu08 with E|g=1170.9 {I24} 
$I|g(rel)=1.0 {I4} (2018Lu08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from 2009Ch43. Other: 1297.6 {I18} (2018Lu08), 1297 (2007LiZN) 
M$1298|g(|q) in 2018Lu08 is consistent with |DJ=1 and excludes |DJ=2; |DJ=1 is also supported by |g|g(|q) in ({+12}C,|apn|g) (2016Fu09). But DCO ratio of 1298|g-1028|g from 2009Ch43 supports |DJ=2. 
$I|g(rel)=4.6 {I2} (2018Lu08), 5.45 {I19} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=2.1 {I4} gate on 1028|g, |DJ=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2009Ch43, but placed from a 3990 level; placement from 2018Lu08 with E|g=2142.0 {I17}. The same placement is also made in ({+12}C,|apn|g) (2016Fu09). Other: 2141 (2007LiZN) 
$I|g(rel)=0.2 {I1} (2018Lu08), 1.45 {I7} (2009Ch43). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1028.3 {I10} (2009Ch43) and 1027.6 {I13} (2018Lu08). It is placed by 2009Ch43 from a 7966 level, not seen in other studies; the placement is from 2018Lu08 and also 2016Fu09 in ({+12}C,|apn|g). Other: 1026 (2007LiZN) 
$I|g(rel)=0.7 {I3} (2018Lu08), 2.18 {I8} (2009Ch43). 
$DCO=0.65 {I12} gate on 1848|g, |DJ=2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 1435 {I3} (1968Mo16) 
RI$from 1968Mo16 
M$D+Q from p|g(|q); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$weighted average of -0.63 {I17} (1968Mo16) and -0.58 {I11} (1969Ha40) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 1850 {I3} (1968Mo16), 1848 (1975Ni01) 
RI$from 1968Mo16. Other: 93 (1975Ni01) 
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.06 {I4} or -2.4 {I3} from p|g(|q) in 1968Mo16; O component (E3 or M3) is ruled out by RUL. Other values: -0.09 {I16} or -2.0 {I15} (1969Ha40). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 2544 {I4} (1968Mo16) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.16 {I4} or -2.6 {I3} from p|g(|q) in 1968Mo16; the larger |d value and E1+M2 are ruled out by RUL based on measured T{-1/2}<7 fs 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
RI$from 1969Ha40 
M,MR$D+Q from p|g(|q) in 1969Ha40; E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E$from difference of level-energies in 1973Ca20 
RI$from 1969Ha40 
M,MR$Q+O from p|g(|q) in 1969Ha40; M2+E3 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Wa14 and 1972Go09 
M$E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$from 1970Ha48. Others: +0.64<|d<+20.4 or -1.56<|d<-0.05 (1973Po03) 
$Note that the two |g(|q) results are in severe disagreement 
$(416|g)(1431|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.16 {I10} (1973Po03) 
$(2059|g)(1431|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.36 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I6} (1973Po03) 
$(2196|g)(1431|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.60 {I6}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1973Po03); A{-2}=-0.65 {I8} (1970Ha48) 
$(2617|g)(1431|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.48 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I6} (1973Po03); A{-2}=-0.38 {I5} or A{-2}=-0.65 {I7} (1970Ha48) 
$(3759|g)(1431|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.58 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} (1973Po03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$416.3 {I3} (1973Wa14) 
RI$others: 8 {I3} (1970Ha48), 7 {I3} (1973Wa14) 
M$D(+Q) from 1973Po03; |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1847.2 {I3} (1973Wa14) and 1847.60 {I15} (1972Go09) 
RI$others: 92 {I3} (1970Ha48), 93 {I4} (1973Wa14) 
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=+0.02 {I4} (1970Ha48) and -0.048 {I40} (1973Po03); O component (E3 or M3) is ruled out by RUL. 
$1429|g-1848|g(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1973Po03); A{-2}=+0.14 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I9} (1970Ha48) 
$(1643|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.29 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5} (1973Po03) 
$(1779|g)(|q)+(1779|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I7} (1973Po03) 
$(1779|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.33 {I11} (1970Ha48) 
$(2377|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.45 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I6} (1973Po03); A{-2}=+0.47 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I8} or A{-2}=+0.64 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.58 {I9} (1970Ha48) 
$(3008|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1973Po03) 
$(3206|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1973Po03) 
$(3343|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.19 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I12} (1973Po03) 
$(3557|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6} (1973Po03) 
$(1226|g)(2377|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.27 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1973Po03) 
$(4122|g)(1848|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.36 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I11} (1973Po03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2537.1 {I5} (1973Wa14) and 2537.5 {I6} (1973Po02) 
RI$others: 88 {I8} (1970Ha48), 82 {I3} (1973Wa14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1428.6 {I4} (1973Wa14) 
RI$others: 53 {I4} (1973Wa14); In 1970Ha48 the authors stated that the 3275-1848-0 cascade and the 3275-1431-0 cannot be distinguished from each other and gave a total |g-branching of 51 {I8} for the two transitions. 
MR$1973Po03 give |d<-5.7, or -1.0<|d<+0.4, or |d>+2.1 for J(3275)=5/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3275.1 {I10} (1973Wa14) and 3274.7 {I20} (1973Po02) 
RI$others: 49 {I8} (1970Ha48), 47 {I4} (1973Wa14) 
MR$<+0.36 (1973Po03), and |d>5 or |d<-0.57 (1970Ha48) for J(3275)=5/2. 
$Note that the two |g(|q) results are in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1642.6 {I3} (1973Wa14) and 1643.0 {I5} (1973Po02) 
RI$others: 62 {I15} (1970Ha48); 62 {I4} (1973Wa14) is discrepant 
M$D+Q from 1973Po03; |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$-0.27<|d<+2.1 (1973Po03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2058.8 {I4} (1973Wa14) and 2059.4 {I10} (1973Po02) 
RI$others: 38 {I15} (1970Ha48), 38 {I4} (1973Wa14) 
M$D+Q from 1973Po03; E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$others: -2.8<|d<0 for J(3490)=5/2 and |d=-1.4 {I3} or 0<|d<3.8 for J=3/2 in 1970Ha48 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1779.1 {I8} (1973Wa14) and 1782.2 {I30} (1973Po02) 
RI$weighted average of 31 {I6} (1970Ha48), 33 {I4} (1973Po03), and 28 {I3} (1973Wa14) 
M$D(+Q) from 1973Po03; |D|p=no from level scheme 
MR$other: -0.05 {I+7-11} (1970Ha48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2195.1 {I10} (1973Wa14) and 2197.1 {I13} (1973Po02) 
RI$weighted average of 69 {I6} (1970Ha48), 67 {I4} (1973Po03), and 72 {I3} (1973Wa14) 
M$Q(+O) from 1973Po03; M2 ruled out by RUL 
MR$other: -0.14 {I12} (1970Ha48) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: <6 (1970Ha48), <3 (1973Wa14) 
$Considered as an unlikely transition by the evaluators as implied Mult=M3 is not allowed by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2616.6 {I8} (1973Wa14) and 2616.1 {I12} (1973Po02) 
RI$others: 100 (1970Ha48), 83 {I9} (1973Po03) 
MR$0.19 {I4} for J(4048)=5/2 or -8<|d<8 for J=3/2 (1970Ha48); -0.33<|d<+0.78 for J=5/2, or |d<-1.28 or -0.36<|d<0 or |d>+1.88 for J=3/2 (1973Po03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4193.9 {I30} (1973Wa14) and 4193.2 {I25} (1973Po02) 
M,MR$Q+O for J(4194)=5/2 with |d>+0.35 or -3.73<|d<+0.07, or O for J=7/2 in 1970Ha48; M2+E3, M3 and E3 ruled out by RUL 
$Note that the two |g(|q) results are in severe disagreement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2377.3 {I6} (1973Wa14) and 2375.6 {I12} (1973Po02) 
MR$other: 0.0 {I1} (1970Ha48) 
$(1226|g)(2377|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.40 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I11} (1973Po03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$0.0 {I3} for J(5191)=5/2, |d<-6.31 or |d>+2.36 for J=3/2 (1973Po03) larger values ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-1.0<|d<+0.29 or |d>+1.9 for J(5406)=5/2, |d<-4.7 or +0.01<|d<+0.51 or |d>+4.7 for J=7/2, |d<-3.5 or -0.63<|d<0 for J=9/2 (1973Po03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$M1 from {+115}In({+34}S,X|g); D(+Q) from {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 
MR$other values (both from {+36}S(pol d,|a|g)): -14 to +11 (possible but not allowed by RUL); -0.52 {I10} (gives B(E2)(W.u.)>910, which is unrealistic in view of RUL=100). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$(M1+E2) in {+36}S(pol d,|a|g) and |D(|p)=no; also D+Q in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 
MR$+0.96 {I64} or +0.96 {I26} in {+36}S(pol d,|a|g); 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$(M1+E2) in {+36}S(pol d,|a|g) and |D(|p)=no 
MR$from {+36}S(pol d,|a|g); -8 {I+3-6} also possible but less likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2(+E3))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|DJ=2, Q |g in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV; (M2+E3) with |d=-0.65 {I28} from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=34 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1, D |g from DCO ({+115}In({+34}S,X|g)) and |g(|q) in ({+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV; (E1) from |g|g(lin pol) ({+115}In({+34}S,X|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$D,E2 based on RUL; (M1,E2) from |D|p=(no) 
$|b(M1)(W.u.)=0.040 {I+26-16} if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=61 {I+41-20} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$(M1) |g from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(|q,lin pol) in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=34 MeV; |DJ=1, D |g in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$(M1) |g from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=34 MeV; |DJ=1, D+Q |g in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2(+M3))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$(E2) |g from |g|g(|q)(DCO) and |g|g(lin pol) in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=34 MeV dataset; |DJ=2, Q in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$from {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 
M$|DJ=1, D(+Q) |g in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV; (E1(+M2)) more likely from |D|p=(yes) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$from {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV 
M$|DJ=2, Q(+O) |g in {+18}O({+18}O,pn|g) E=20-44 MeV; (M2(+E3)) more likely from |D|p=(yes) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.18 {I+15-14} for (4)-; |?-0.36 for (3)- (e-mail reply from P.C. Bender, Feb. 29, 2012) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=2.5 {I6} if E2, and B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0015 {I4} if M1 from an earlier communication from authors of 2012Be11, who list same B(M1)(W.u.) value (for 3- to 3- transition), and give no value for B(E2)(W.u.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.040 {I+26-16} if M1; B(E2)(W.u.)=61 {I+41-20} if E2 from an earlier communication from authors of 2012Be11, who list same B(M1)(W.u.) value (for 4- to 3- transition), and give no value for B(E2)(W.u.) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$ Evaluators note that negative A{-2} in 2012Be11 is inconsistent with |DJ=2, quadrupole transition, which requires positive A{-2} 
$ 2012Be11 list BE2W GT 18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2+E3)
decay_comment:
$ DCO=1.6 {I3} gated on 429|g 
M$ highly mixed transition suggested by DCO=1.62 {I26}, POL |? 0 for gate on 429.4|g (2+ to 1+, M1+E2 transition) 
MR$ -0.27 to -1.03 from analysis of DCO and POL data with |s/J=0.4. Other possible |d=+1.2 to +4.0 is unrealistic from RUL. Shell-model calculations predicting |d=-0.034 is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$ DCO=1.68 {I14} (|DJ=1, dipole gate), |D(IPDCO)=+0.15 {I17}. 
M$E2 disagrees with unnatural parity assignment in (pol d,|a) which would imply M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$ DCO=0.88 {I9} (|DJ=2 gate), |D(IPDCO)=-0.22 {I11} 
E$placement from 6236 level in Adopted Levels, Gammas according to the level scheme in 2009Be26, 2009Ch43 and 2005Ol02; a strong 1046|g reported in 2009Be26 and 2005Ol02 is not seen in 2006Kr07 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$2019Gr08 cite in Table IV B(M1)(W.u.) and B(E2)(W.u.) values from the Adopted dataset for {+34}P in the ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
If order of 921.4|g-934.7|g cascade is reversed, 921.4|g and 934.7|g populate and depopulate a 1359.4 level, respectively. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$other: 963 {I6} from ({+48}Ca,X|g), 976 {I17} from Coulomb excitation 
M$|DJ=0 or 2 transition from |g(|q) in ({+48}Ca,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=0 or 2 transition from I|g(122|')/I|g(136|')=1.0 {I7}; I|g(85|')/I|g(136|')=1.0 {I8} (2004So30) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$it is likely there is intensity missing in the decays depopulating the 289 level due to the intensity imbalance (2021Hi09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$not observed in 2019Ri03, below detection threshold. Energy value from level-energy difference 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2209.9 keV {I11} (1972Ca22), 2210.0 {I1} (2012Lo14), 2210.6 {I3} (2013Se08 - previous value 2210.9 {I3} (2011Se03)). 
RI others: 100 {I1} at 90|' and 135|' gated by 2210|g (2013Se08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E others: Weighted average of 1194.1 {I1} (2012Lo14) and 1194.0 {I1} (2013Se08 - previous value 1193.8 {I1} (2011Se03)), 1192.0 {I5} (1973Ku15). 
RI others: 33.5 {I5} at 90|' and 43.3 {I10} at 135|' gated by 2210|g (2013Se08) 
MR$ from |g(|q) data (2013Se08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1457.9 {I4} (2012Lo14) and 1456.5 {I3} (2013Se08). 
RI others: 11 {I3} at 90|' and 13.9 {I9} at 135|' gated by 2210|g (2013Se08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1467.0 {I4} (2012Lo14) and 1466.2 {I3} (2013Se08) 
RI others: 3.1 {I1} at 90|' and 3.6 {I6} at 135|' gated by 2210|g (2013Se08). Branching: 67 {I17} for I|g(3676)=100(17) (1973Ku15) 
MR from 2013Se08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 2012Lo14. Same value in 2013Se08 (previous value: 1283.3 {I17} (2011Se03)). 
RI others: 1.2 {I2} at 90|' gated by 1194|g and |g not observed at 135|' (2013Se08). I|g(1283.4)/I|g(2477.4)=20.5(36)/100(6) (2011Se03 - from I|g(1283.4)/I|g(2477.4)=17(3)/83(5)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 2477.4 {I1} (2012Lo14), 2477.3 {I3} (2013Se08 - previous value 2477.1 {I2} (2011Se03)). 
RI others: 6.0 {I4} at 90|' and 9.3 {I9} at 135|' gated by 2210|g (2013Se08). 
MR$ from 2013Se08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1404.5 {I1} (2012Lo14), 1405.1 {I4} (2013Se08 - previous value 1405.7 (2011Se03)). 
RI others: 3.1 {I4} at 90|' and 1.9 {I4} at 135|' gated by 1194|g (2013Se08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 2598.6 {I4} (2012Lo14), 2599.0 {I4} (2013Se08 - previous value 2599.5 {I5} (2011Se03)). 
RI others: I|g(2598.8)/I|g(1404.5)=59(11)/100(13) (2011Se03 - from I|g(2598.8)/I|g(1404.5)=37(7)/63(8)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 2921.8 {I1} (2012Lo14), 2921.4 {I4} (2013Se08 - previous value 2921.8 {I2} (2011Se03)), 2925 {I2} (1973Ku15) 
RI others: 9.7 {I4} at 90|' and 18.3 {I10} at 135|' gated by 2210|g (2013Se08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1248.40 {I20} from {+31}Cl |e decay, 1248.4 {I3} from {+32}Ar |ep decay, 1248.9 {I1} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1248.5 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 1248.9 {I2} from ({+3}He,n), and 1249.0 {I10} from ({+3}He,|a|g). Others: 1249 {I7} from ({+32}S,{+31}S|g), 1248 {I6} from (|g,n|g); 1249.8 {I1} from ({+12}C,|an|g) is discrepant 
M,MR$From |a|g(|q) in {+32}S({+3}He,|a|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 985.62 {I23} from {+31}Cl |e decay and 986.0 {I2} from (|a,n|g). 
RI$other: 5.5 {I11} in (|a,n|g) is discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2233.97 {I20} from {+31}Cl |e decay and 2234.4 {I2} from (|a,n|g). Others: 2235.8 {I8} from ({+12}C,|an|g), 2235.6 {I4} from ({+3}He,n), 2236.1 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,n|g) seem somewhat discrepant 
M,MR$|a|g(|q) in {+32}S({+3}He,|a|g) gives |d(M3/E2)=-0.05 {I4} but RUL=10 for B(M3)(W.u.) suggests |d very near zero 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1049.66 {I21} from {+31}Cl |e decay, 1050.4 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), and 1049.8 {I2} from (|a,n|g). Other: 1051.4 {I3} from ({+12}C,|an|g) is discrepant 
RI$weighted average of 32.0 {I12} from {+31}Cl |e decay, 35.9 {I26} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), and 35 {I7} from ({+3}He,|a|g). Other: 18.7 {I6} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant 
M$D+Q from DCO in ({+20}Ne,n|g), |DJ=0; (M1+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2035.24 {I20} from {+31}Cl |e decay, 2035.8 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 2035.5 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 2036.6 {I4} from ({+3}He,n). Others: 2035.9 {I8} from ({+12}C,|an|g) and 2040 {I10} from ({+3}He,|a|g) 
M,MR$+0.21 {I11} or +1.9 {I2} for J(3284)=5/2; +1.3 {I6} for J(3284)=3/2 (1970Mo08) in ({+3}He,|a|g); (M1+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3283.57 {I31} from {+31}Cl |e decay, 3285.3 {I11} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 3285.8 {I14} from ({+12}C,|an|g), 3284.4 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 3290 {I10} from ({+3}He,|a|g) 
RI$weighted average of 25.3 {I14} from {+31}Cl |e decay and 23.8 {I18} from ({+20}Ne,n|g). Other: 18.2 {I6} in (|a,n|g) seems discrepant 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); (E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2100.79 {I25} from {+31}Cl |e decay, 2101.9 {I5} from ({+12}C,|an|g), 2101.7 {I2} from (|a,n|g), and 2102.2 {I5} from ({+3}He,n). Other: 2102.4 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,n|g) seems discrepant 
M$Q from DCO in ({+12}C,|an|g), with |DJ=2; (E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g from (|g,n|g), I|g from ({+3}He,|a|g). 
$|d(E4/M3)=-0.5 {I5} or -2 {I3} for J(3351)=7/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.8 {I6} for 3/2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$other: 2184.7 {I5} in (|a,n|g) seems discrepant 
${+32}S({+3}He,|a|g) only resolved the summed branching of the 2190 and 1200 |g-rays which is 100 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from |a|g(|q) in {+32}S({+3}He,|a|g); (M1+E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 2837.5 {I16} from (|a,n|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2959.09 {I31} from {+31}Cl |e decay and 2959.6 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
M$2014Do04 assign |DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), but the level in 2014Do04 requires |DJ=0, dipole; (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1166.2 {I3} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1166.1 {I5} from ({+12}C,|an|g), and 1164.9 {I2} from (|a,n|g) 
M$D with |DJ=1 from DCO in ({+20}Ne,n|g); (E1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1233.8 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1232.8 {I2} from ({+12}C,|an|g), and 1232.1 {I2} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,n|g). Other: 100 {I6} from (|a,n|g) 
M$|DJ=0 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1299.1 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1298.4 {I3} from ({+12}C,|an|g), and 1298.7 {I1} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 60 {I4} from ({+20}Ne,n|g) and 80 {I6} from (|a,n|g) 
M$DCO in ({+20}Ne,n|g) with |DJ=1; (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); (E2) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1672.53 {I29} from {+31}Cl |e decay 
RI$from {+31}Cl |e decay. Other: 100 {I20} from (|a,n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1949.2 {I2} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1949.8 {I5} from ({+12}C,|an|g), and 1950.3 {I2} from (|a,n|g) 
M$D from DCO in ({+20}Ne,n|g) and ({+12}C,|an|g), with |DJ=1; (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$|DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1393.9 {I6} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1394.2 {I4} from ({+12}C,|an|g) and 1393.8 {I6} from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$DCO in ({+20}Ne,n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), |DJ=1; (M1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+2}H({+30}P,{+31}S|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), (E1) from |D|p, where parity assignments of connecting levels are uniquely established from independent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1090.7 {I10} from ({+20}Ne,n|g), 1090.5 {I7} from ({+12}C,|an|g), and 1091.2 {I4} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$other: 12.0 {I13} in ({+20}Ne,n|g) seems discrepant 
M$|DJ=1 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 3042.4 {I4} with I|g=100 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,n|g) and 3042.2 {I10} from ({+12}C,|an|g) 
M$DCO in ({+20}Ne,n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 909.4 {I5} from ({+20}Ne,n|g) and 907.6 {I5} ({+12}C,|an|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2084.4 {I11} from ({+20}Ne,n|g) and 2084.7 {I6} from ({+12}C,|an|g) 
RI$from ({+20}Ne,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=2234.2 {I2}, I|g=100 {I1} (2011SaZM) 
$E|g=2234.5 {I8}, I|g=100 {I12} (2006Ka11). |g also seen in 1998Ax02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=5157.0 {I3}, I|g=1.2 {I1} (from Table 5.8 in 2011SaZM); 5157 {I4} in author's table 5.10 seems a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=3540 {I3}, I|g|?2.9 (2011SaZM) 
E$2006Ka11 give 3536 {I2} with I|g=26 {I8} and tentative placement. In 2011SaZM, a |g peak at 3534.7 {I2} with I|g=5.7 {I2} matches closely with the first escape peak of 4046.2 {I2} |g line. Gate on 2234|g shows a 3540 {I3} peak in 2011SaZM which gives a level at 5774 {I3}. In an e-mail reply of Oct 31, 2012 from A. Saastamoinen, spectral figure with TAC gate shows 3535 and 3540 resolved with about equal intensities 
RI$approximately half the total intensity of 5.7 in 2011SaZM assigned based on spectral figure mentioned above. Intensity of 26 {I8} in 2006Ka11 probably has a dominant component of single escape of 4046 |g line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=6389.7 {I11}, E|g=0.24 {I7} (2011SaZM). 
RI$according to e-mail reply of Oct 31, 2012 from the author of 2011SaZM, part of the intensity was from double escape of 7415.8|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$ from 1971En02 
MR$other: +5.3 {I4} (1970Mo08) which gives B(E2)(W.u.)=62 {I17}, rather high and improbable, thus the lower value is preferred. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$for E2(+M3) suggested -0.05 {I4}, other value of -2.4 {I2} (1970Mo08), both are improbable from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g is not observed in other |g-ray studies, thus treated as questionable by evaluator, and not included in Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
MR$|d(E4,M3)=-0.5 {I5} or -2 {I3} (1970Mo08) for J|p(3349)=7/2+; |d(E2,M1)=+0.8 {I6} for J|p(3349)=3/2+. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2230.2 {I4} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 2230.3 {I5} from {+33}Ar |ep decay, 2230.49 {I15} from (|g,|g'), and 2231.7 {I10} from (p,p'|g). Others: 2240 {I30} from ({+31}P,n|g), 2240 {I10} from (n,n'|g). 
M$Q from p|g(|q) in (p,p'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_comment:
E,TI$from {+32}Cl |e decay 
$q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.042 {I8}, X(E0/E2)=0.048 {I8}, |r{+2}=0.0164 {I33} using a T{-1/2}=0.89 ps {I9} (2022Ki03 evaluation). Using the adopted T{-1/2}=0.82 ps {I7} and E0 branching here with adopted X(E0/E2)=0.048 {I8} in 2022Ki03, the evaluator has deduced |r{+2}=0.0175 {I33} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2050.9 {I4} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 2052.6 {I15} from (p,p'|g). Other: 2070 {I30} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 17.5 {I10} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 14.9 {I6} from (p,|g) E=res, and 16.3 {I8} from (p,p'|g). Other: 7.5 {I22} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in {+31}P(p,p'|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: +29 {I17} from (p,|g) E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4281.7 {I7} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 4281.53 {I30} from (|g,|g'), and 4281.8 {I15} from (p,p'|g). Other: 4320 {I30} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g) E=res. Others: 100.0 {I24} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 100.0 {I22} from (|a,n|g), and 100.0 {I23} from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2464.3 {I5} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 2466.0 {I15} from (p,p'|g). 
RI$from {+32}Cl |e decay. Others: 100 {I18} from ({+31}P,n|g), 100 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 100.0 {I17} from (p,|g) E=res, and 100 {I5} from (p,p'|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (p,p'|g); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: |d(Q/D)=-0.08 {I11} from |g(|q) in (p,|g) E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4695.3 {I8} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 4694.0 {I25} from (p,p'|g). 
RI$unweighted average of 57.8 {I12} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 74 {I15} from ({+31}P,n|g), 72 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 63.9 {I17} from (p,|g) E=res, and 72 {I5} from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2775.2 {I5} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 2776.2 {I12} from (p,p'|g). Other: 2750 {I20} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (p,|g) E=res. Others: 100 {I11} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 100.0 {I10} from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3317.9 {I6} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 3318.5 {I20} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I10} from (|a,n|g), 100.0 {I25} from (p,|g) E=res, and 100 {I9} from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 63 {I6} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 61 {I10} from (|a,n|g), 66.7 {I25} from (p,|g) E=res, and 66.7 {I33} from (p,p'|g) 
M$Q from |g(|q) in (p,|g) E=res; M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: 29 {I4} from (p,|g) E=res is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0046 {I+16-10} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5.0 {I+17-11} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 2887.9 {I20} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I10} from (p,|g) E=res; 100 {I11} from (p,p'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$others: 76 {I8} from (p,|g) E=res; 113 {I11} from (p,p'|g) is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0022 {I+7-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.48 {I+15-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 13 {I6} from (p,|g) E=res and 23 {I10} from (p,p'|g) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4770.0 {I8} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 4770.49 {I33} from (p,|g) E=res 
RI$other: 100 {I6} from (p,|g) E=res 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.12 {I+6-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=23 {I+12-6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 12.8 {I19} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 10.5 {I12} from (p,|g) E=res. Note that 1973Mo06 in (p,p'|g) report a 2656|g with a branching similar to that of 2418|g here seen in other studies including the most recent one while report no observation of the 2418|g. The evaluator consider the 2656|g from 1973Mo06 questionable. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.084 {I+24-17} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=62 {I+18-12} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 4.3 {I17} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 3.5 {I12} from (p,|g) E=res 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.018 {I+8-6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=9.5 {I+40-32} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$other: 100 {I20} from (p,|g) E=res 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0130 {I+50-29} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=2.3 {I+9-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 7483.7 {I15} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 7483.2 {I5} from (|g,|g') 
RI$from {+32}Cl |e decay. Other: 100 {I24} from (|g,|g') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.05 {I3} or -2.5 {I7} (1997Br07) in (p,|g) E=res; |D|p=yes from level scheme; the larger value |d=-2.5 {I7} is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5894.32 {I28} from (p,|g) E=res and 5894.04 {I34} from (|g,|g') 
RI$from (|g,|g'). Other: 18 {I6} from (p,|g) E=res 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.111 {I+21-16} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=13.6 {I+26-19} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 8124.12 {I24} from (p,|g) E=res and 8124.37 {I24} from (|g,|g'). Other: 8125.4 {I16} from {+32}Cl |e decay 
RI$from (|g,|g'). Others: 100 {I13} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 100 {I6} from (p,|g) E=res 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$|g seen in Si(|a,n|g). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.5 {I+14-70} for J=3, Q for J=5 from n|g(|q) in (|a,n|g) (1997Br07); M2 ruled out by RUL. This makes Mult=M1+E2 for J|p=3-, or E2 for J|p=5-; a 2304|g from 5+ proton resonance rules out J|p=3- since Mult=M2 for 2304|g is ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.5 {I4} for J=4, Q for J=6 from |g(|q) in (p,|g) E=res (1997Br07); M2 ruled out by RUL. This makes M1+E2 for J|p=4+ or E2 for J|p=6+, while J|p=6+ is ruled out by 1632|g, D+Q from a spin=3 resonance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$this |g is reported as the only branch with certain branching in {+32}Cl |e decay (2018Ab06), but it not reported in (p,|g) E=res by 1997Br07, which however claim that there is a 30% of intensity unaccounted for from this level in their measurement. I(8407|g)>54 is deduced from intensities reported in 2018Ab06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|g,|g'). Other: 6.3E3 {I1} from ({+31}P,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 67 {I7} from (|a,|g) E=res and 49 {I20} from (|g,|g'). Other: 36 {I9} for a broad peak at E=6300 {I100} ({+31}P,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|g,|g'). Other: 8470 {I50} from ({+31}P,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,|g) E=res. Others: 100 {I18} from ({+31}P,n|g) and 100 {I27} from (|g,|g') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,n|g). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=-4.3 {I+16-97} for J=6, >4 for J=4 (1997Br07) from n|g(|q) in (|a,n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0048 {I+16-11} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.0 {I+13-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from (|a,n|g). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.5 {I+10-6} for J=4, Q for J=6 (1997Br07) from n|g(|q) in (|a,n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. This makes M1+E2 for J|p=4-, or E2 for J|p=6- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6973.5 {I13} from {+32}Cl |e decay and 6975.0 {I5} from (|g,|g') 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0053 {I+26-14} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.46 {I+23-12} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 9207.3 {I19} from {+32}Cl |e decay, 9206.1 {I7} from (p,|g) E=res, and 9207.7 {I9} from (|g,|g') 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.82 {I+24-19} for J=5, Q for J=7 (1997Br07) from n|g(|q) (|a,n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. This makes M1+E2 for J|p=5-, or E2 for J|p=7- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.1 {I3} for J=4, Q for J=6 (1997Br07) from {+29}Si(|a,n|g); M2 ruled out by RUL. This makes M1+E2 for J|p=4-, or E2 for J|p=6-, with the latter J|p being adopted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$this strongest branch seen in (p,|g) E=res is not seen in {+32}Cl |e decay, because this high-energy |g rays is near the detection sensitivity threshold (2012Me03,2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 30.9 {I30} from (|a,|g) E=res and 33.9 {I32} from (p,|g) E=res 
MR$other: -0.09 {I2} from (|a,|g) E=res. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 16.2 {I15} from (|a,|g) E=res and 22.6 {I16} from (p,|g) E=res 
MR$other: +0.11 {I5} from (|a,|g) E=res. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Me03. Others: 2230.4 {I16} (1968Ar03) and 2230.5 {I15} (1973De08) 
RI$from 2012Me03. Others: 96 {I4} (1966An01), 89 {I6} (1968Ar03), and 92 {I4} (1973De08) 
RI$ 2012Me03 quote uncertainty of +0.6-0.4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Me03. Others: 1545.9 {I20} (1968Ar03) and 1548 {I2} (1973De08) 
RI$from 2012Me03. Others: 5.1 {I26} (1966An01), 5 {I3} (1968Ar03), and 3.6 {I6} (1973De08) 
RI$ 2012Me03 quote uncertainty of +0.040-0.036. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E0]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3777 {I4} (2012Me03) and 3779.6 {I8} (2018Ab06) 
TI$other: 0.044 {I25} (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2050.7 {I4} (2012Me03) and 2051.0 {I4} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.47 {I4} (2012Me03) and 0.419 {I24} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4279.6 {I20} (1968Ar03), 4281.5 {I15} (1973De08), and 4282.0 {I7} (2012Me03) 
RI$weighted average of 2.1 {I11} (1966An01), 4 {I2} (1968Ar03), 2.6 {I1} (1973De08), and 2.42 {I6} (2012Me03) 
RI$ 2012Me03 give branching ratio of 83.5 {I11}; 1.1 (stat), +0.3-0.1 (syst). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 915.8 {I5} (2012Me03) and 916.8 {I10} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.034 {I9} (2012Me03) and 0.019 {I6} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2464.1 {I17} (1968Ar03), 2463.8 {I10} (1973De08), and 2464.4 {I5} (2012Me03) 
RI$weighted average of 6.9 {I21} (1966An01), 5.0 {I25} (1968Ar03), 4.0 {I4} (1973De08), 4.24 {I5} (2012Me03), and 3.92 {I12} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4694.3 {I20} (1968Ar03), 4694 {I2} (1973De08), and 4695.6 {I8} (2012Me03) 
RI$from 2012Me03. Others: 4 {I3} (1968Ar03) and 2.8 {I6} (1973De08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 851.8 {I5} (2012Me03) and 852.9 {I6} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.027 {I8} (2012Me03) and 0.014 {I6} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1265.7 {I6} (2012Me03) and 1266.9 {I7} (2018Ab06) 
RI$other: <0.036 {I13} (2012Me03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1769.6 {I4} (2012Me03) and 1769.8 {I4} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.136 {I26} (2012Me03) and 0.125 {I13} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Me03. Others: 3319 {I2} (1968Ar03) and 3317.5 {I15} (1973De08) 
RI$weighted average of 4.1 {I18} (1966An01), 4 {I1} (1968Ar03), 2.5 {I4} (1973De08), and 2.46 {I5} (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Me03. Others: 5548 {I2} (1968Ar03) and 5549.5 {I20} (1973De08) 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I10} (1966An01), 3.0 {I5} (1968Ar03), 1.6 {I3} (1973De08), and 1.50 {I9} (2012Me03) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.08-0.09 (2012Me03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1969.3 {I6} (2012Me03) and 1970.4 {I4} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.15 {I4} (2012Me03) and 0.134 {I19} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2383.3 {I5} (2012Me03) and 2383.6 {I5} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.077 {I20} (2012Me03) and 0.058 {I7} (2018Ab06) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.019-0.021 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2885 {I2} (1973De08) and 2887.0 {I5} (2012Me03) 
RI$from 2012Me03. Other: 1.0 {I4} (1973De08) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.028-0.025 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4433 {I2} (1973De08), 4435.5 {I8} (2012Me03), and 4434.8 {I8} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.8 {I2} (1973De08), 0.83 {I6} (2012Me03), and 0.73 {I3} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6665.8 {I21} (2012Me03) and 6664.9 {I16} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.048 {I19} (2012Me03) and 0.036 {I7} (2018Ab06) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.018-0.019 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1451.8 {I4} (2012Me03) and 1452.2 {I4} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.276 {I19} (2012Me03) and 0.235 {I14} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Me03. Other: 2305.2 {I5} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.137 {I23} (2012Me03) and 0.157 {I9} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2719.0 {I5} (2012Me03) and 2718.8 {I5} (2018Ab06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.533 {I22} (2012Me03) and 0.471 {I17} (2018Ab06) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.019-0.024 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3222.4 {I6} (2012Me03) and 3222.1 {I6} (2018Ab06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.881 {I28} (2012Me03) and 0.764 {I25} (2018Ab06) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.029-0.027 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4767.6 {I16} (1968Ar03), 4770.0 {I15} (1973De08), 4770.8 {I8} (2012Me03), and 4769.8 {I9} (2018Ab06) 
RI$from 2012Me03. Others: 20.5 {I23} (1966An01), 25 {I4} (1968Ar03), and 20.5 {I20} (1973De08) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.20-0.17 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 7001.4 {I16} (2012Me03) and 7000.6 {I15} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.057 {I16} (2012Me03) and 0.054 {I7} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2417.7 {I6} (2012Me03) and 2418.3 {I5} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.057 {I14} (2012Me03) and 0.064 {I9} (2018Ab06) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.013-0.015 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2832.4 {I15} (2012Me03) and 2831.0 {I9} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.019 {I13} (2012Me03) and 0.022 {I8} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3339.7 {I12} (2012Me03) and 3339.0 {I8} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.037 {I15} (2012Me03) and 0.024 {I9} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4881 {I4} (1973De08), 4883.7 {I8} (2012Me03), and 4882.7 {I9} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.504 {I32} (2012Me03) and 0.477 {I20} (2018Ab06). Other: 0.45 {I20} (1973De08) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.031-0.032 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2495.2 {I23} (2012Me03) and 2494.4 {I9} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.016 {I14} (2012Me03) and 0.010 {I7} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3412.2 {I7} (2012Me03) and 3412.5 {I7} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.122 {I19} (2012Me03) and 0.148 {I12} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4959.6 {I8} (2012Me03) and 4958.7 {I9} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.32 {I4} (2012Me03) and 0.262 {I14} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 7194 {I3} (1973De08) and 7189.8 {I12} (2012Me03) 
RI$from 2012Me03. Other: 0.41 {I10} (1973De08) is discrepant 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.024-0.020 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5693.3 {I13} (2012Me03) and 5691.6 {I11} (2018Ab06) 
RI$weighted average of 0.033 {I14} (2012Me03) and 0.037 {I7} (2018Ab06) 
RI$ quoted uncertainty=+0.014-0.013 (2012Me03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2012Me03. Other: 6973.3 {I15} (2018Ab06) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.098 {I18} (2012Me03) and 0.015 {I4} (2018Ab06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2010Ad03. Others: 2230.6 {I9} (1989Bo21), 2230.4 {I19} (2014Ko17) 
RI$deduced from I|g(2230.3)=1.83 {I24} relative I|g=100 for 810.6|g in {+33}Cl and %I|g(810.6)=42.1 {I11} from {+33}Ar |e decay. Relative I|g(2230.3)=1.83 {I24} is from p|g-coin in 1987Bo21. Others: 1.8 {I5} from |g singles in 1987Bo21; 3.9 {I4} from 2014Ko17; 6.1 {I2} in 2010Ad03 is too high as explained by the authors due to some trigger problems. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-0.24 {I6} for J=3, -0.30 {I6} for J=4, +0.26 {I4} for J=5 (1971Ch52) 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I10} (1971Ch52) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-0.20 {I7} for J=3, -0.34 {I8} for J=4, +0.23 {I4} for J=5 (1971Ch52) 
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I8} (1971Ch52) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.081 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.098 {I27} (1970Fo13) 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.16 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.99 {I17}, A{-2}=+0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=0.00 {I10} (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 12 {I4} (1972Co13), 16 {I2} (1974Vi02), 15 {I3} (1972Le29), 12 (1973Ko28), 14.5 {I7} (1971In02), 15 {I3} (1970Fo13). 
$A{-2}=+0.33, A{-4}=+0.74 (1971In02) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=+29 {I17} from |g(|q) (1971In02); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in 1997Br07; M2 ruled by RUL 
RI$others: 88 {I4} (1972Co13), 84 {I2} (1974Vi02), 85 {I3} (1972Le29), 88 (1973Ko28), 85.5 {I7} (1971In02), 85 {I3} (1970Fo13). 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I10} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I4} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.30 {I3} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.32 {I6} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in 1997Br07; M2 ruled out by RUL 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I1} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 61 {I3} (1972Co13), 55 {I3} (1974Vi02), 64 {I4} (1972Le29), 55 (1965Sp05), 56 (1973Ko28), 50 {I10} (1970Fo13). 
$A{-2}=-0.38 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I9} (1974Vi02) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1974Vi02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 39 {I3} (1972Co13), 45 {I3} (1974Vi02), 36 {I4} (1972Le29), 45 (1965Sp05), 44 (1973Ko28), 50 {I10} (1970Fo13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
RI$from 1976Ve03. Others: 96 {I1} (1975Bo42), 92 {I5} (1972Co13), 96 {I2} (1974Vi02), 96 {I2} (1972Le29), 97 (1973Ko28), 97 (1974Gr15) 
M,MR$others: 0.00 {I3} (1976Ve03), +0.03 {I2} (1973Ve08); +3.5 {I8} (1969Pi10) is discrepant. |D|p=yes from level scheme 
$A{-2}=-0.279 {I27}, A{-4}=-0.063 {I30} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=-0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
RI$from 1976Ve03. Others: 4 {I1} (1975Bo42), 8 {I5} (1972Co13), 4 {I2} (1974Vi02), 4 {I2} (1972Le29), 3 (1973Ko28), 3 (1974Gr15); 100 (1965Sp05) only |g ray seen 
M,MR$0 (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D) is weighted average of +7.1 {I-14+24} (1997Br07) and +6.3 {I-16+51} (1997Br07); M2 ruled out by RUL. Other: |d>20 (1976Ve03) 
RI$others: 90 {I5} (1972Co13), 100 (1974Vi02), 100 (1972Le29), 100 (1973Ko28) 
$A{-2}=+0.066 {I40}, A{-4}=+0.077 {I41} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.12 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I7} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I4} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I6} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I4} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I4} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1997Br07) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in 1997Br07; M2 ruled out by RUL 
RI$others: 59 {I5} (1972Co13), 55 {I5} (1974Vi02), 62 {I4} (1972Le29), 70 (1965Sp05), 54 (1973Ko28), 60 {I10} (1970Fo13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.50 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.35 {I2} (1981He09) 
RI$others: 41 {I5} (1972Co13), 45 {I5} (1974Vi02), 38 {I4} (1972Le29), 30 (1965Sp05), 46 (1973Ko28), 40 {I10} (1970Fo13) 
M$not given in 1981He09; Q implied from |g(|q) in 1981He09, M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1976Ve03. Others: +0.05 {I4} (1973Ve08), +0.14 {I2} (1969Pi10), 
RI$from 1976Ve03. Others: 100 (1975Bo42), 100 (1972Co13), 100 (1974Vi02), 100 (1972Le29), 97 (1974Gr15) 
$A{-2}=+0.100 {I4}, A{-4}=0.001 {I4} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$+0.28 {I14} if 3- or -0.13 {I11} if 4+ (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.15 {I9} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I4} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.45 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I2} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$from 1976Ve03, seen indirectly. Others: 3 {I2} (1972Co13), 2 (1974Gr15), <0.9 (1975Bo42) 
M,MR$0.0 {I5} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$others: 66 {I5} (1972Co13), 75 {I3} (1976Ve03), 76 {I4} (1974Vi02), 74 {I4} (1972Le29), 90 (1965Sp05), 73 (1973Ko28), 85 {I10} (1970Fo13), 75 (1974Gr15). 
M,MR$|d(Q/D) is unweighted average of +2.9 {I8} (1997Br07), +5.5 {I4} (1976Ve03), +5.7 {I3} and +6.2 {I3} (1973Ve08), +3.7 {I+14-4} (1974Gr15); M2 ruled out by RUL 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.14 {I2} (1972Co13) 
$weighted average of 3 measurements 
$A{-2}=+0.49 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I4} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.25 {I2} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.32 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.22 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.53 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.26 {I5} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.40 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I4} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from 1976Ve03; |D|p=yes from level scheme. Others: -0.24 {I4} (1973Ve08), or -0.21 {I5} (1973Ve08), +0.3 {I+8-5} (1974Gr15). 
RI$others: 28 {I5} (1972Co13), 22 {I3} (1976Ve03), 22 {I4} (1974Vi02), 24 {I4} (1972Le29), 24 (1973Ko28), 15 {I10} (1970Fo13), 21 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I4} (1972Co13) 
$weighted average of 3 measurements, 
$A{-2}=+0.559 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.031 {I22} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.23 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(O/Q) from |g(|q) in 1976Ve03; E2+M3 ruled out by RUL 
M,MR$-0.41 {I8} or -2.1 {I4} (1976Ve03) 
RI$others: 3 {I2} (1972Co13), 1.7 {I3} (1976Ve03), 2 {I1} (1974Vi02), 2 {I1} (1972Le29), 10 (1965Sp05), 2 (1973Ko28), 2 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.05 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.30 {I5} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I3} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: (50) (1972Co13), 52 {I7} (1972Le29), 52 (1973Ko28) 
M$Q from |g(|q) in 1997Br07; M2 ruled out by RUL 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.31 {I2} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1976Ve03 
M,MR$+0.12 {I3} (1976Ve03) for J=5 
RI$others: 35 {I10} (1976Ve03), 29 {I6} (1998Ka31), 20 (1974Gr15) 
$A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: 3 {I2} (1972Co13), <1 (1976Ve03) 
$The unrealistically large B(E5)(W.u.)=1.6|*10{+8} {I+13-8} makes this placement questionable, which may indicate it is g.s. transition from a different level with a lower spin. This transition is omitted in Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Vi02. Others: <5 from 1975Bo42, <5 (1972Le29), <2 (1998Ka31), 10 {I5} (1970Fo13) 
$A{-2}=+0.14 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.24 {I5} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Vi02. Others: 20 {I10} (1975Bo42), 21 {I9} (1972Le29), 27 {I4} (1998Ka31), 20 {I10} (1970Fo13) 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.31 {I4} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=+0.04 {I3} from 1981He09, +0.09 {I9} if J=4 and 0.50 {I12} if J=3 from 1976Ve03; M2 and M3 ruled out by RUL 
RI$from 1975Bo42 and 1974Vi02 
RI$from 1974Vi02. Others: 100 (1972Co13), 80 {I10} (1975Bo42), 79 {I9} (1972Le29), 73 {I7} (1998Ka31), 70 {I10} (1970Fo13) 
$A{-2}=+0.48 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.33 {I2} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2006Tr03 
RI$from 1974Vi02. Other: 100 (1975Bo42), 100 (1975Bo42), 90 {I5} (1972Co13), 100 (1973Ve06), 100 (1972Le29), 100 (1973Ko28) 
$A{-2}=+0.02 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in 1973Ve08; M2 ruled out by RUL. Others: |d=-2.7 {I3} or +0.07 {I3} (1981He09), +0.06 {I4} or +1.8 {I3} (1976Ve03), +2.7 {I2} or -0.05 {I3} (1973Ve08). 
RI$others: 92 {I5} (1972Co13), 80 {I10} (1974Vi02), 91 {I4} (1972Le29), 70 (1965Sp05), 50 (1973Ko28) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I6} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4} (1981He09) 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I5} (1974Vi02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 60 {I10} (1972Co13), <20 (1974Vi02), 60 {I10} (1972Le29); 1974Vi02 disagrees with both 1975Bo42 and 1972Co13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$recent results from 1998Ka31 find only 59 {I15} of the intensity of the decay in this |g, this level may decay by unknown branches 
M$from |g(|q) in 1997Br07 
RI$others: 100 (1997Br07), 100 (1974Vi02), (100) (1972Le29), 59 {I15} (1998Ka31) 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I7} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q from |g(|q) in 1981He09; M2 ruled out by RUL 
RI$others: 70 {I20} (1972Co13), 100 (1974Vi02), 100 (1972Le29), 100 (1973Ko28), 60 {I15} (1970Fo13) 
$A{-2}=+0.44 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.44 {I5} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.37 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9} (1997Br07) 
M,MR$-0.05 {I3} or -2.5 {I7} (1997Br07) 
RI$other: 100 (1972Co13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D) is weighted average of -7.9 {I15} and -11 {I2} (1976Ve03); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 
RI$others: 65 (1972Co13), 65 {I7} (1976Ve03), 55 {I5} (1972Le29), 60 {I10} (1998Ka31), 75 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.18 {I2} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=-0.13 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.29 {I9} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: <6 (1972Co13), <15 (1976Ve03), 3 {I1} (1998Ka31), 25 (1974Gr15). 1974Gr15 claim that because of the good Ge resolution, a 25% branch is established from the spectra taken at E(p)=1583-keV resonance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2006Tr03 
RI$from 1974Vi02. Others: 9 {I6} (1975Bo42), 16 {I5} (1972Co13), 16 (1973Ve06), 23 {I13} (1972Le29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2006Tr03 
RI$from 1974Vi02. Others: 91 {I6} (1975Bo42), 84 {I5} (1972Co13), 84 (1973Ve06), 77 {I13} (1972Le29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$-0.03 {I8} or -2.9 {I7} (1997Br07) 
RI$from 1997Br07 
$A{-2}=-0.47 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I13} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$not seen in 1997Br07; but author claim that 19% of the intensity is unaccounted. This transition is seen in 1974Vi02 with I|g=60 {I20}, and in 1970Fo13 with I|g=60 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from 2006Tr03 
RI$others: 38 (1972Co13), 38 {I4} (1974Vi02), 30 {I6} (1963Te01) 
M$from |g(|q) in 1963Te01 
$A{-2}=+0.26 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I15} (1962Be39) 
$A{-2}=+0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} (1963Te01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this transition is not confirmed in later studies 
RI$other: 2 (1963Te01) 
M,MR$1962Ne10 assign J(4460)=1 with |d{+2}(4830|g)=0.02 {I1} based on |g|g(|q), while adopted J(4460)=4+ doesn't support the placement this transition. 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.48 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I11} (1962Ne10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$others: 19 {I2} (1975Bo42), 20 (1972Co13), 21 {I4} (1974Vi02), 20 (1963Te01) 
$|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I3} (1962Be39) 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I8} (1962Ne10) 
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) in 1962Ne10 
M,MR$|d{+2}=0.01 {I1} (1962Ne10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$others: 40 {I5} (1975Bo42), 40 (1972Co13), 32 {I3} (1974Vi02), 32 (1963Te01) 
M$from |g(|q) in 1963Te01 
M,MR$-0.06 {I2} (1963Te01) 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5} (1962Be39) 
$A{-2}=-0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1963Te01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 62 {I5} (1975Bo42), 63 (1972Co13), 68 {I4} (1974Vi02) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.042 {I28} (1962Be39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 82 (1972Co13), 77 {I4} (1974Vi02), 75 (1963Sp03) 
$A{-2}=+0.20 (1963Sp03), A{-2}=-0.273 {I15} (1964Sm03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1963Sp03 with I|g=1, but not confirmed in other studies 
$A{-2}=+0.15 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.50 {I9} (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Vi02. Others: 58 {I5} (1975Bo42), 61 (1972Co13), 57 (1963Sp03) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I4} (1963Sp03), 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.37 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.27 {I13} (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1977Ko07 
RI$others: 7 (1972Co13), 7 {I2} (1974Vi02), 7 (1972Le29), 8 (1963Sp03) 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I4} (1977Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1977Ko07 
RI$others: 9 (1972Co13), 10 {I3} (1974Vi02), 10 (1972Le29), 8 (1963Sp03) 
$A{-2}=+0.76 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I10} (1977Ko07) 
$A{-2}=+0.22 (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=0 (1977Ko07) 
RI$others: 77 (1972Co13), 74 {I4} (1974Vi02), 76 (1972Le29), 65 (1963Sp03) 
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I17} (1977Ko07) 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I2} (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 3.5 {I3} (1975Bo42), 5 (1972Co13), 3 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 28.2 {I32}, 29.4, 37.5, respectively 
$A{-2}=+0.61 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.24 {I6} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 2.4 {I10} (1975Bo42), 4 (1972Co13), 2 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 19.4 {I66}, 23.5, 25.0, respectively 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.43 {I5} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 6.5 {I6} (1975Bo42), 8 (1972Co13), 3 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 52.4 {I50}, 47.1, 37.5, respectively 
$A{-2}=-0.71 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.46 {I3} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$only seen in 1963Sp03 but not confirmed in later studies 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1981He09) 
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 3.9 {I3} (1975Bo42), 4 (1972Co13), 3 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 4.5 {I4}, 4.8, 3.4, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 4.0 {I7} (1975Bo42), 3 (1972Co13), 4 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 4.6 {I8}, 3.6, 4.5, respectively 
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1981He09 
E,RI$from 1981He09 only 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I7} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 6.5 {I7} (1975Bo42), 5 (1972Co13), 9 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 7.4 {I7}, 6.0, 10.1, respectively 
$A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$other: -5.3 {I18} (1977Ko07) is discrepant 
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 28 {I2} (1975Bo42), 26 (1972Co13), 31 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 32 {I2}, 31, 35, respectively 
$A{-2}=-0.34 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1977Ko07) 
$A{-2}=-0.45 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 6.6 {I6} (1975Bo42), 7 (1972Co13), 6 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 7.5 {I7}, 8.4, 6.7, respectively 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I2} (1981He09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3} (1981He09) 
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 7.6 {I7} (1975Bo42), 6 (1972Co13), 6 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 8.7 {I8}, 7.2, 6.7, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$other: +0.1 {I1} (1977Ko07) 
RI$from 1981He09. Others: 31 {I3} (1975Bo42), 32 (1972Co13), 30 (1972Le29) from the undivided doublet, equivalent to branchings from this level of 35 {I3}, 39, 34, respectively 
$A{-2}=0.00 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.10 {I4} (1977Ko07) 
$A{-2}=+0.09 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (1981He09), 
$A{-2}=+0.18 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I7} (1970Ho25) 
$|g|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.20 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.1 {I10} (1963Sp03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1973Ve08. Others: 0.02 {I3} (1976Ve03), +0.07 {I3} (1969Pi10) 
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 46 {I3} (1975Bo42), 45 (1972Co13), 50 {I5} (1973Ve08), 49 (1972Le29), 47 (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.238 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.044 {I14} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.33 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Other: -0.1 {I1} (1969Pi10) 
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 3.8 {I7} (1975Bo42), 4 (1972Co13), 4 {I1} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 4 (1972Le29), 4 (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I10} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: -0.08 {I5} (1973Ve08), -0.02 {I3} (1969Pi10) 
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 13 {I1} (1975Bo42), 12 (1972Co13), 12 {I3} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 12 (1972Le29), 14 (1969Pi10). 
$A{-2}=-0.130 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.042 {I27} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 0.9 {I2} (1975Bo42), (1) (1972Co13), 0.9 {I4} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 1 (1972Le29), 2 (1969Pi10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 1.5 {I2} (1975Bo42), 2 (1972Co13), 1.6 {I7} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 1 (1972Le29), 2 (1969Pi10). 
$A{-2}=+0.29 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I8} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: +0.10 {I2} (1973Ve08), +0.06 {I2} (1969Pi10), +0.05 {I2} (1965An08) 
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 32 {I3} (1975Bo42), 34 (1972Co13), 28 {I3} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 31 (1972Le29), 29 (1969Pi10). 
$A{-2}=+0.278 {I32}, A{-4}=+0.015 {I34} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$from 1986Zi08. Others: 2.0 {I2} (1975Bo42), 2 (1972Co13), 1.8 {I7} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 2 (1972Le29), 2 (1969Pi10). 
M$from 1976Ve03 
$A{-2}=+0.52 {I13}, A{-4}=0.00 {I13} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.50 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 44 (1972Co13), 39 {I4} (1973Ve08), 40 {I4} (1974Vi02), 52 (1972Le29) 
M,MR$from 1974Vi02. Other: 0.06 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1974Vi02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 25 (1972Co13), 22 {I2} (1973Ve08), 19 {I6} (1974Vi02), 25 (1972Le29) 
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.22 {I8} from 1974Vi02, +0.04 {I6} from 1973Ve08. But the O component is unlikely, based on RUL with |G<10 eV (1973Ve08) and |G{-|g}>0.1 eV implied from measured S{-p|g} of this resonance. 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I7} (1974Vi02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 6 (1972Co13), 7 {I2} (1973Ve08), 9 {I3} (1974Vi02), 7 (1972Le29) 
MR$or -6.8 {I18} (1974Vi02) 
$A{-2}=-0.67 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I10} (1974Vi02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$others: 10 (1972Co13), 12 {1} (1973Ve08), 12 {I4} (1974Vi02), 11 (1972Le29) 
M,MR$from 1974Vi02. Others: -0.26 {I3} or -1.53 {I7} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.83 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.12 {I9} (1974Vi02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: 0.5 (1972Co13), 0.6 {I3} (1974Vi02), 2 (1972Le29) 
$1973Ve08 state that this transition seen in earlier work attributed to this E(p)=1399.6 resonance is probably due to a braod resonance located at aournd this energy. For adopted J|p(10219.5)=3+, this transition would have a mult=M3, which would require a |g-decay partial T{-1/2}>88 fs based on RUL=10 for B(M3)(W.u.), corresponding to |G{-|g}<0.005 eV. However, measured S{-p|g}=(2J+1)|G{-p}|G{-|g}/|G\ |?0.7 eV implies |G{-|g}>0.1 eV, wihch doesn't allow this M3 transition placed here. Therefore, the evaluator considers this placement questionable and does not adopt it in Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Other: 0.06 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
RI$others: 4 (1972Co13), 2 {I1} (1974Vi02) 
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I1} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Other: -0.02 {I5} (1973Ve08) 
RI$others: 63 (1972Co13), 66 {I7} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 69 {I4} (1974Vi02), 67 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.37 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I1} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$others: 4 (1972Co13), <1 (1974Vi02) 
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Other: -0.04 {I6} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.52 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.27 {I9} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.51 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I9} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1973Ve08 
RI$others: 18 (1972Co13), 22 {I2} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 18 {I6} (1974Vi02), 22 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=-0.03 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1973Ve08 
RI$others: 11 (1972Co13), 12 {I3} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 11 {I4} (1974Vi02), 11 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=-0.76 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$-0.21|>|d|>-4.7 (1973Ve08) 
RI$others: 48 (1972Co13), 41 {I4} (1973Ve08), 42 {I4} (1974Vi02), 50 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 11 (1972Co13), 11 {I1} (1973Ve08), 14 {I4} (1974Vi02), 11 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 7 (1972Co13), 7 {I2} (1973Ve08), 7 {I2} (1974Vi02), 4 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$others: 4 (1972Co13), 6.4 {I13} (1973Ve08), 6.2 {I25} (1976Ve03), 6 (1972Le29), 9 (1969Pi10), 5 (1974Gr15) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.40 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I8} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$others: 3 (1972Co13), 3.2 {I10} (1973Ve08), 4.1 {I16} (1976Ve03), 3 (1974Gr15) 
$A{-2}=-0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: -0.03 {I2} (1973Ve08), +0.9 {I3} (1972Co13), +0.3 {I+2-1} (1974Gr15). 
RI$others: 77 (1972Co13), 75 {I8} (1973Ve08), 77 {I7} (1976Ve03), 79 (1972Le29), 76 (1969Pi10), 78 (1974Gr15) 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1972Co13) 
$A{-2}=+0.66 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.46 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.54 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M,MR$+0.50 {I8} (1976Ve03) 
RI$from 1976Ve03; not seen in 1975Bo42. Others: 1.0 {I4} (1973Ve08), <1 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.55 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: -0.15 {I3} (1973Ve08), -0.2 {I1} or -2.2 {I5} (1972Co13), -0.2 {I1} (1974Gr15) 
RI$others: 4 (1972Co13), 4 {I1} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 4 (1972Le29), 5 (1969Pi10), 4 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.22 {I4} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.51 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I14} (1972Co13) 
$A{-2}=-0.54 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I8} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=-0.52 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=-0.57 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I7} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: +0.07 {I13} (1973Ve08), +0.9 {I3} (1972Co13), +0.15 {I20} (1974Gr15) 
RI$others: 11 (1972Co13), 8 {I2} (1973Ve08,1976Ve03), 10 (1972Le29), 9 (1969Pi10), 9 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.61 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1972Co13) 
$A{-2}=+0.51 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I1} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.46 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.53 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I6} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+O
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$others: 1 (1972Co13), 0.6 {I3} (1973Ve08), 0.5 {I2} (1976Ve03), 1 (1972Le29), 1 (1969Pi10), 1 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.44 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.25 {I2} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1973Ve08 
RI$others: 31 (1972Co13), 36 {I4} (1973Ve08), 35 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1973Ve08 
RI$others: 25 (1972Co13), 19 {I2} (1973Ve08), 24 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.16 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I3} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1973Ve08 
RI$others: 36 (1972Co13), 32 {I3} (1973Ve08), 33 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.42 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5} (1973Ve08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1977Ko07 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 14 {I1} (1975Bo42), 14 (1972Co13), 13 (1969Pi10), 18 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.44 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.057 {I32} (1977Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1977Ko07 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 12 {I1} (1975Bo42), 13 (1972Co13), 12 (1969Pi10), 11 (1972Le29) 
$A{-2}=+0.140 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I10} (1977Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1977Ko07 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 9.2 {I7} (1975Bo42), 8 (1972Co13), 11 (1969Pi10), 11 (1972Le29), <11 (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=-0.276 {I35}, A{-4}=-0.171 {I36} (1977Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1977Ko07. Other: 0.04 {I3} (1965An08) 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 40 {I3} (1975Bo42), 43 (1972Co13), 40 (1969Pi10), 35 (1972Le29), 40 (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.544 {I33}, A{-4}=-0.088 {I34} (1977Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1977Ko07. Other: 0.16 {I2} (1965An08) 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 12 {I1} (1975Bo42), 12 (1972Co13), 11 (1969Pi10), 12 (1972Le29), 11 (1969Pi10) 
$A{-2}=+0.479 {I41}, A{-4}=-0.024 {I43} (1977Ko07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 3.9 {I4} (1975Bo42), 2.9 (1972Co13), 4.9 {I15} (1973Ve08), 4.2 {I17} (1976Ve03), 4 (1972Le29), 4 (1969Pi10), 4 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.54 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: <0.3 (1975Bo42), 0.3 (1972Co13), 0.5 {I2} (1973Ve08), 0.7 {I3} (1976Ve03), 0.7 (1974Gr15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 1.0 {I4} (1973Ve08), 1.3 {I5} (1976Ve03), 1 (1974Gr15) 
$A{-2}=+0.57 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I10} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 2.2 {I17} (1975Bo42), 2.4 (1972Co13), 2.3 {I7} (1973Ve08), 2.7 {I11} (1976Ve03), 2 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=-0.07 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=-0.07 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I10} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: -0.05 {I4} (1973Ve08), +0.9 {I3} (1972Co13), +0.05 {I10} (1974Gr15) 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 82 {I5} (1975Bo42), 84 (1972Co13), 83 {I9} (1973Ve08), 84 {I8} (1976Ve03), 89 (1972Le29), 85 (1969Pi10), 85 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} (1972Co13) 
$A{-2}=+0.41 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.48 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Others: +0.21 {I4} (1973Ve08), +0.2 {I1} (1972Co13), +0.2 {I1} (1974Gr15) 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 6.4 {I5} (1975Bo42), 5.6 (1972Co13), 5.8 {I12} (1973Ve08), 5.6 {I22} (1976Ve03), 6 (1972Le29), 7 (1969Pi10), 4.5 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.04 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I9} (1973Ve08) 
$A{-2}=+0.04 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1972Co13) 
$A{-2}=+0.06 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I1} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03. Other: +0.8 {I+6-4} (1974Gr15) 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 1.4 {I4} (1975Bo42), 1.8 (1972Co13), 1.3 {I5} (1973Ve08), 1.1 {I4} (1976Ve03), 1 (1972Le29), 1 (1969Pi10), 1 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.43 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1976Ve03) 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.16 {I12} (1972Co13) 
$A{-2}=+0.52 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I10} (1974Gr15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 1.8 {I5} (1975Bo42), 2 (1972Co13), 2 (1969Pi10), 0.7 (1974Gr15), <0.1 (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from 1976Ve03 
RI$from 1998Ka31. Others: 0.8 {I3} (1975Bo42), 1 (1972Co13), 0.5 {I2} (1973Ve08), 0.3 {I1} (1976Ve03), <0.5 (1972Le29), <1.0 (1969Pi10), 1 (1974Gr15). 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I5} (1976Ve03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1972Co13 with a large branching of 44%, but not seen in 1997Br07. It is likely this transition is from a different resonance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$other: +0.86 {I11} (1977Ko07) 
RI$others: 19 (1972Co13), 18 (1973Ko28) 
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1977Ko07) 
$A{-2}=-0.02 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I7} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$other: -0.45 {I15} (1977Ko07) 
RI$others: 70 (1972Co13), 64 (1973Ko28) 
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1977Ko07) 
$A{-2}=+0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1970Fo13 with I|g=6, not seen from this resonance in 1997Br07, so not adopted here. This transition could be unresolved with the similar one from E(p)=2026 resonance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 62 (1970Fo13) 
RI$1970Fo13 report most of the intensity from this |g but did not see several other transitions seen in 1997Br07. It is likely that this transition in 1970Fo13 is unresolved with the similar one from E(p)=2026 resonance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$seen by 1970Fo13 with I|g=12 but not subsequently seen by the much more detailed study of 1997Br07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$seen by 1970Fo13, attributing their highest intensity (33) to this transition but not subsequently seen by the much more detailed study of 1997Br07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$seen by 1970Fo13 with %I|g=6 but not subsequently seen by the much more detailed study of 1997Br07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$other: 47 (1970Fo13) 
E$1970Fo13 also report a transition to a 8595 level with %I|g=8, which is not seen by the much more detailed study of 1997Br07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.38 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} at E{-|a}=8.8 MeV, and A{-2}=-0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I6} (1972Ga43) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.46 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.71 {I18} (1997Br07) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.5 {I+14-70} for J=3; Mult=Q for J=5 (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.31 {I15} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I9} (1983Fr16) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.5 {I4} for J=4; Mult=Q for J=6 (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=-4.3 {I+16-97} for J=6, >4 for J=4 (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=-0.45 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.46 {I16} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.5 {I+10-6} for J=4; Mult=Q for J=6 (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.58 {I32} (1997Br07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.82 {I+24-19} for J=5; Mult=Q for J=7 (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.51 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.38 {I9} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.39 {I9} (1983Fr16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+1.1 {I3} for J=4; Mult=Q for J=6 (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.26 {I15} (1997Br07) 
$A{-2}=+0.38 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.37 {I11} (1983Fr16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(5894|g)/I|g(8124|g)=15.7 {I3}, with an additional 3% systematic uncertainty to be added (2013Lo05). Other: 14 {I3} (2002Ba28). 


