# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1476.0 {I2}, I|g=0.65 {I6} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1475.9 {I3}, I|g=0.57 {I11} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=1475.6 {I10}, I|g=0.5 {I2} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=1475.0 {I20}, I|g: weak (1967Li01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=386.28 {I5}, I|g=100 (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=386.3 {I2}, I|g=100 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=386.8 {I2}, I|g=100 (1969Co20) 
$E|g=387.0 {I10}, I|g=100 (1967Li01) 
$(386|g)[143|g](965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.079 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.016 {I15}; A{-2}=-0.072 {I11} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$|d(E2/M1)=-1.4 {I1} (1969Kh10) for J=7/2- for 1494 level 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.5 {I1} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2 |) 7/2 |) 5/2 sequence for 387-620 cascade 
$(386|g)[143|g](965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)[596|g](512|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.026 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I18}; A{-2}=+0.028 {I10} if A{-4}=0 
$(386|g)[596|g](512|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.042 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I35} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)[596|g](122|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.004 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I24}; A{-2}=+0.002 {I17} if A{-4}=0 
$(386|g)[596|g](122|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.031 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.165 {I25} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)[620|g](487|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.029 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I12}; A{-2}=+0.037 {I6} if A{-4}=0 
$(386|g)[620|g](487|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.023 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.039 {I10} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)(1107|g)+(1107|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.016 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I13}; A{-2}=-0.020 {I8} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(386|g)(1107|g)+(1107|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)(1107|g)+(1107|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.017 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.096 {I19} (1969Kh10) 
$(386|g)(143|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.047 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I27}; A{-2}=+0.042 {I16} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(386|g)(143|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.039 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.116 {I19} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.066 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I11}; A{-2}=-0.069 {I6} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(386|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.062 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.032 {I13} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.121 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1975BeYD) gives |d(M2/E1)=0.12 {I2} for 386|g with |d(M3/E2)=0.45 {I5} for 596|g 
$(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.108 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.024 {I10}; A{-2}=-0.098 {I6} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.107 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.043 {I10} (1976Sa39) 
$(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.205 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1969Kh10) 
$(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.131 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.031 {I20} (1975BeYD) giving |d(M2/E1)=0.12 {I2} for 386|g with |d(E2/M1)=0.07 {I2} for 620|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1006.5 {I2}, I|g=0.8 {I2} (1970Zo01, tentatively from 1494 level) 
$E|g=1006.5 {I1}, I|g=0.81 {I20} (1970Ta07, from 1494 level) 
$E|g=1007.0 {I10} (1969Co20, from 1494 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
$E|g=1493.8 {I4}, I|g=0.054 {I6} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1493.6 {I8}, I|g=0.05 {I3} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=1493.848 {I8}, deduced from level-energy difference, in good agreement with the measured E|g value for the doublet 
$Total I|g=0.076 {I2} for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=1011.4 {I2}, I|g=0.73 {I7} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1011.4 {I2}, I|g=0.67 {I20} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=1008.0 {I25}, I|g=2 {I1} (1967Li01, possible doublet) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=528.6 {I3}, I|g=0.05 {I2} (1970Zo01, from 1494 level) 
$E|g=529.1 {I5}, I|g=0.07 {I3} (1970Ta07, from 1494 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=753.41 {I7}, I|g=3.5 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=753.2 {I1}, I|g=3.4 {I4} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=753.2 {I5}, I|g=2.6 {I6} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=752.0 {I10}, I|g=4 {I1} (1967Li01) 
MR$-0.085 {I15} or +12 {I2} (1978Kr06). The lower value is preferred based on the systematics of hindrance of M1 transitions in this mass region 
$(753|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.043 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I12}; A{-2}=+0.041 {I7} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06) 
$(753|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.09 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1976Sa39) 
$(753|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.105 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1975BeYD) giving |d(E2/M1)=0.07 {I2} for 753|g and |d(M2/E1)=0.07 {I2} for 386|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=771.26 {I7}, I|g=2.2 {I2} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=771.2 {I1}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=771.3 {I5}, I|g=1.2 {I3} (1969Co20) 
$E|g=772.0 {I10}, I|g=2.0 {I5} (1967Li01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1139.8 {I3}, I|g=0.22 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1139.8 {I8}, I|g=0.21 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=1140.4 {I10} (1969Co20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1282.7 {I3}, I|g=0.29 {I3} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1282.8 {I6}, I|g=0.24 {I5} (1970Ta07) 
$E|g=1283.4 {I10}, I|g=0.2 {I1} (1969Co20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1759.6 {I2}, I|g=0.10 {I1} (1970Zo01, I|g=1.0 {I1} in Table 1 of 1970Zo01 is a misprint as pointed out by K. Krane (Oregon) in an email communication of April 29, 2016 to the evaluators, the value should be 0.10 {I1}, also confirmed by W.B. Walters (Maryland) in an email reply of May 6, 2016). 
$E|g=1758.4 {I15} (1969Co20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1485.8 {I4}, I|g=0.050 {I5} (1970Zo01) 
$E|g=1486.4 {I8}, I|g=0.05 {I3} (1970Ta07) 
E$somewhat poor fit, level-energy difference gives E|g=1485.940 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1107.008 {I22}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by 0.326 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet 
MR$+3 {I+10-1} for J(2601)=9/2 (1978Kr06). Other: +0.08 {I7} or +4.3 {I+18-10} for J(2601)=11/2 (1978Kr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=1493.366 {I23}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by 0.435 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1085.3 {I8}, I|g=0.044 {I7} (1970Zo01, tentatively placed from 1476 level) 
$E|g=1086.9 {I7}, I|g=0.09 {I4} (1970Ta07), from 1476 level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.2 in 2021Zh44 is too small to be realistic, increased to 2.0 by evaluators 
$R{-ADO}=0.59 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.3 in 2021Zh44 is too small to be realistic, increased to 3.0 by evaluators 
$R{-ADO}=1.24 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=7.1 {i23} recalculated from I(K| x ray)/I|g (1968Kj02) with a fluorescence yield of 0.528 from 1972Bb16. 1963Is03 give |a(K)exp|?12 from (K| x ray)|g measurements. 
TI$taken equal to 100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 198.4 {I2} from {+73}Zn |b{+-} decay (24.5 s), 199.1 {I2} from {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g), and 199.2 {I5} from Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 217.8 {I2} from {+73}Zn |b{+-} decay (24.5 s), 218.2 {I2} from {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g), and 218.4 {I6} from Coulomb excitation. The final level is g.s. based on data in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 278.1 {I3} from {+73}Zn |b{+-} decay (24.5 s) and 279.0 {I7} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 495.7 {I2} from {+73}Zn |b{+-} decay (24.5 s), 496.2 {I2} from {+238}U({+76}Ge,X|g), and 495.8 {I5} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentative placement of this transition is proposed by 1985Ru05. This |g is not included in Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
M$dipole from I(K X-ray), but inconsistent with the Adopted J|p assignments of 7/2- to 3/2- for the 956 level to 911 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 217.4 {I2} (2017Ve05), 217.9 {I2} (2010Di14) and 218.1 {I2} (1983Ru06) 
RI$from 1983Ru06. Other: 100 {I5} from 2017Ve05 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 277.9 {I3} (2017Ve05) and 278.4 {I4} (1983Ru06) 
RI$weighted average of 2.1 {I3} (2017Ve05) and 1.6 {I2} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 495.6 {I1} (2017Ve05), 496.2 {I2} (2010Di14) and 495.6 {I3} (1983Ru06) 
RI$weighted average of 28.4 {I14} (2017Ve05) and 24.7 {I13} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 415.2 {I2} (2017Ve05) and 415.2 {I4} (1983Ru06) 
RI$unweighted average of 2.3 {I1} (2017Ve05) and 1.7 {I2} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 693.4 {I1} (2017Ve05), 693.3 {I3} (2010Di14) and 693.1 {I3} (1983Ru06) 
RI$unweighted average of 7.7 {I4} (2017Ve05) and 6.3 {I4} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1475.2 {I2} (2017Ve05) and 1474.3 {I5} (1983Ru06) 
RI$weighted average of 2.6 {I2} (2017Ve05) and 2.2 {I5} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1428.7 {I2} (2017Ve05) and 1428.3 {I5} (1983Ru06) 
RI$unweighted average of 2.9 {I2} (2017Ve05) and 1.5 {I4} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1198.1 {I4} (2017Ve05) and 1197.3 {I4} (1983Ru06) 
RI$weighted average of 11.9 {I23} (2017Ve05) and 12.9 {I9} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1613.1 {I2} (2017Ve05) and 1612.9 {I4} (1983Ru06) 
RI$weighted average of 16.3 {I13} (2017Ve05) and 15.4 {I9} (1983Ru06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E$from difference of sum peak at 59.7 and 56.7|g. This transition is expected to be almost totally converted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI$from I|g(59.7)<0.04(I|g(56.6|g)) (1974Va08); this |g was not observed, but sum peak was observed by 1974Va08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved |g, value deduced by 1974Va08 (see {+74}Ga IT decay). This transition is expected to be almost totally converted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp|<0.43 (1974Va08). The value of |a(K)exp allows also E1(+M2) with |d<0.16. Also no K x-rays decaying with T{-1/2}=10 s observed (1974Va08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
TI$from I|g(59.7|g)<0.04(I|g(56.5|g)) (1974Va08). This |g has not been observed; but sum peak observed by 1974Va08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$from ce data (1986Ek01) 
CC$the evaluators assign an uncertainty of 10% to the authors' quoted %E2 in order to estimate uncertainty in |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
MR$from ce data (1986Ek01) 
CC$the evaluators assign an uncertainty of 10% to the authors' quoted %E2 in order to estimate uncertainty in |a 
RI$1.68 {I16} from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.2 (1.9%) in 2014Li32 seems too low in view of uncertainties assigned to other |g rays. Evaluator assigns 10% uncertainty 
$EG=74.7 3, IG=9.6 24 (1987Wi13), placed from a 312 level; a second component with IG AP 2.6 was unplaced 
M$from |a(exp)|<0.40 (2014Li32); estimated from intensity balance considerations and |g|g coincidence intensities 
CC$value taken from BrIcc code to overlap M1 and E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
$EG=685.60 5, IG=34.0 21 (1987Wi13), placed from a 686 level 
$EG=685.6 2, IG=30 3 (1986Ek01), placed from a 686 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=712.53 5, IG=100 5 (1987Wi13), placed from a 712 level 
$EG=712.5 2, IG=100 5 (1986Ek01), placed from a 712 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=176.71 7, IG=11.2 8 (1987Wi13), placed from a 889 level 
$EG=176.7 3, IG=8.0 20 (1986Ek01), tentative unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=964.93 6, IG=34.5 24 (1987Wi13), placed from a 964 level 
$EG=964.5 2, IG=36 3 (1986Ek01), placed from a 964 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.1 (0.9%) in 2014Li32 seems too high in view of uncertainties assigned to other strong |g rays. Evaluator assigns 5% uncertainty 
$EG=462.99 7, IG=12.0 12 (1987Wi13), placed from a 1427 level 
$EG=462.8 5, IG=9.1 15 (1986Ek01), placed from a 1427 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 21 (27%) in 2014Li32 seems too high in view of uncertainties assigned to other strong |g rays. Evaluator assigns 10% uncertainty 
$EG=715.40 5, IG=75 4 (1987Wi13), placed from a 1427 level 
$EG=715.3 2, IG=82 5 (1986Ek01), placed from a 1427 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=742.36 6, IG=21.8 16 (1987Wi13), placed from a 1427 level 
$EG=742.6 3, IG=14.3 20 (1986Ek01), placed from a 1427 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=614.58 7, IG=16.0 15 (1987Wi13), placed from a 1503 level 
$EG=614.9 3, IG=12.5 20 (1986Ek01), placed from a 2478 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=642.21 5, IG=32.0 21 (1987Wi13), placed from a 2070 level 
$EG=642.2 3, IG=22 3 (1986Ek01), placed from a 2070 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$EG=1151.15 8, IG=29.2 22 (1987Wi13), placed from a 2655 level 
$EG=1151.0 3, IG=14.1 20 (1986Ek01), placed from a 1863 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 351.1 {I1} from {+81}Zn |b{+-} decay, 350.8 {I1} from {+82}Zn |b{+-}n decay, and 350.6 {I3} from ({+238}U,F|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0085 {I+17-12} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=85 {I+17-12} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from {+81}Zn |b{+-} decay. Other: 451.5 {I3} from {+82}Zn |b{+-}n decay 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.008 {I+9-4} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5|*10{+1} {I+6-2} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 350.9 {I3} (2010Pa33) and 351.1 {I1} (2020Pa26) 
RI$same value in 2010Pa33 and 2020Pa26. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 451.6 {I4} (2010Pa33) and 451.6 {I1} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 19 {I3} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1107.6 {I9} (2010Pa33) and 1107.4 {I2} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 4 {I3} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1458.3 {I12} (2010Pa33) and 1458.3 {I2} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 4 {I2} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1585.4 {I13} (2010Pa33) and 1585.5 {I1} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 9 {I5} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1936.3 {I17} (2010Pa33) and 1936.3 {I2} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 10 {I6} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2358.4 {I20} (2010Pa33) and 2358.4 {I2} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 17 {I7} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4294 {I4} (2010Pa33) and 4295.4 {I4} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 13 {I4} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4880 {I4} (2010Pa33) and 4880.4 {I4} (2020Pa26) 
RI$other: 19 {I5} (2010Pa33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
TI$from the |g-transition intensity balance at 34.5. It appears to the evaluatorrs that I|g=24.2 {I25} listed in Table I and Fig. 7 of 2016Al10 is I|g+ce value, with the assumption of mult=M1 for 34.5|g 
M$M1 is consistent with short half-life (<10 ns) of 34.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
TI$from the |g-transition intensity balance at 140.7. It appears to the evaluators that I|g=1.7 {I7} listed in Table I and Fig. 7 of 2016Al10 is I|g+ce value, with the assumption of mult=E2 for 140.7|g 
M$E2 is consistent with isomer half-life 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty of 0.5 keV assigned by compiler 
M$2023Yo04 assumed E2 uncertainty in analogy with an isomer in {+92}Rb, and assuming spherical shape for both the nuclei. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 100.0 {I32} ({+54}Fe,2n|g) and 100.0 {I54} ({+32}S,2|a|g) 
MR$-3.9 {I+7-4} or -0.09 {I3}, the latter is rejected by 2003Fa01 based on |h{+2}=0.54 for the former and 0.80 for the latter. In the opinion of the evaluator the difference in the two |h{+2} values is not significant enough to reject one value. The study of 1991En01 preferred the lower mixing ratio. See also B(M2) values below which support the lower value of the mixing ratio. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=4.1|*10{+-6} {I6}, B(M2)(W.u.)=0.055 {I+43-30} for |d(M2/E1)=-0.09 {I3}. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=2.5|*10{+-7} {I+12-5}, B(M2)(W.u.)=6.4 {I+8-10} for |d(M2/E1)=-3.9 {I+7-4}, which gives unreasonably high B(M2)(W.u.), as RUL(M2)=1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$1090.0 in table 3 (1991En01) seems to be a misprint. E|g=1090.9 in figure 11 and 1091 in figures 9 and 10 of 1991En01 
M$A{-2}=-0.09 {I5} suggests |DJ=1, but it is inconsistent with adopted |DJ|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2} gives |d(Q/D)=-0.09 {I+5-3} (1991En01) 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=2.4|*10{+-6} (from erratum for 1991En01) assuming B(E2)(W.u.)(5- to 3-)=0.4 as for a similar state in {+66}Ge. This value of B(E1)(W.u.) is considered (by 1991En01) to indicate isospin impurity (T{-1/2}=1 component in the otherwise T{-1/2}=0 nucleus) of |?1.2% in the 5- and 4+ states 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$linear polarization data and angular correlation data are also consistent with M1, but systematics of nuclei in this region do not support this assignment 
MR$according to 2003Fa01, the second solution of -0.09 {I3} is not likely since it has reduced |h{+2}=0.80, as compared to 0.54 for the higher |d value. On the other hand 1991En01 preferred the lower |d value and B(M2) values below also support the lower value of the mixing ratio, which is adopted by the evaluators. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=4.1|*10{+-6} {I6}, B(M2)(W.u.)=0.055 {I+43-30} for |d(M2/E1)=-0.09 {I3}. 
$B(E1)(W.u.)=2.5|*10{+-7} {I+12-5}, B(M2)(W.u.)=6.4 {I+8-10} for |d(M2/E1)=-3.9 {I+7-4}, which gives unreasonably high B(M2)(W.u.), as RUL(M2)=1. 
$R(|q)=-0.09 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$See level x for alternate placement by 1997So06 
A{-2}=-0.26 {I3} 
A{-4}=0. 
$ 1995He27 QUOTE A4=2E-4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q) (1979Wa23,1982So04,1990HeYS); M1+E2 from RUL. 
MR from 1990HeYS; other: -3.3 {I+18-26} (1979Wa23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M D+Q from |g(|q) (1980Cl01,1990HeYS); E1+M2 from linear polarization (1980Cl01) 
MR from 1980Cl01; other: -0.04 {I2} (1990HeYS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 2013Co23. Precise energy is given as 956.9 {I1} in {+66}Ge Adopted dataset in ENSDF database 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$|g not observed in Coulomb Excitation experiment (2013Co23) due to expected low statistics (|?50 counts), a spectrum that is indistinguishable from the background fluctuations, and Compton edge due to the 956.9|g. This |g was, however, seen in authors' inelastic scattering and proton knockout experiments (2013Co23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E not present in the n|g coincidence spectrum (1979Al04); 1978Al32 place it in the {+67}Ga decay scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: -0.49 {I7} from |g(|q) in {+48}Ca({+32}S,4p|g), -0.09 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), -6 {I+2-5} or -0.65 {I10} from |g(|q) in {+64}Zn({+7}Li,p2n|g), and -0.18 {I+20-10} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: +0.11 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+48}Ca({+32}S,4p|g), -0.02 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), and -0.15 {I+10-50} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: -0.05 {I3} from |g(|q) in {+48}Ca({+32}S,4p|g), +0.01 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), -0.11 {I9} from |g(|q) in {+64}Zn({+7}Li,p2n|g), and -0.16 {I+20-50} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: -0.08 {I3} from |g(|q) in {+48}Ca({+32}S,4p|g), +0.06 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), and -0.15 {I+10-50} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 
M$E1 from |g(lin pol) in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g),{+64}Zn({+7}Li,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: +0.01 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+48}Ca({+32}S,4p|g), -0.01 {I2} from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), and -0.02 {I+2-15} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 
M$E1 from |g(lin pol) in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g),{+64}Zn({+7}Li,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g). Others: +0.07 {I1} from |g(|q) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,4p|g) and 0.00 {I+2-20} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$Others: +0.07 {I1} from |g(|q) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,4p|g) and +0.05 {I1} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR$|d(M3/E2)=0.0 {I+3-1} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 
RI$Other: 31.7 {I16} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
MR$|d(M3/E2)=-0.07 {I10} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,2n|g) 
RI$Other: 52 {I3} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.210 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.056 {I14} 
M$Q from |g(|q), E2 from polarization measurement (1981De03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.072 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I13} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g), A{-2}=+0.094 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.016 {I13} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) 
MR$Other: -0.09 {I2} from {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) (1981De03), -6 {I+2-5} or -0.65 {I10} (1982Pa03), and -0.18 {I+20-10} (1977Mo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.150 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I12} 
M$Q from |g(|q), E2 from polarization measurement (1981De03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.317 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.071 {I21} 
$R(DCO)=1.02 {I4} 
M$Q from |g(|q), E2 from polarization measurement (1981De03). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=0.0 {I1} (1977Mo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.105 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.018 {I14} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g), A{-2}=-0.177 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.023 {I22} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) 
MR$Other: -0.02 {I2} from {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) (1981De03) and -0.15 {I+10-50} (1977Mo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.107 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I15} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g), A{-2}=-0.189 {I21}, A{-4}=0.028 {I26} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) 
MR$Other: +0.01 {I2} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) (1981De03), -0.11 {I9} (1982Pa03), and -0.16 {I+20-50} (1977Mo20). 
$R{-DCO}=1.73 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.151 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g), A{-2}=-0.126 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.025 {I19} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) 
MR$Other: +0.06 {I2} from {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) (1981De03) and -0.15 {I+10-50} (1977Mo20). 
M$E1 from polarization measurement (1981De03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.293 {I24}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I25} in {+58}Ni({+12}C,2p|g), A{-2}=-0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I3} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) 
MR$Other: -0.01 {I2} from {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) (1981De03) and -0.02 {I+2-15} (1977Mo20). 
M$E1 from polarization measurement (1981De03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.303 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I4} 
$R(DCO)=0.97 {I5} 
M$Q from |g(|q), E2 from polarization measurement (1981De03). 
MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.1 {I1} (1977Mo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.182 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I2} in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g). 
$R(DCO)=1.51 {I19} 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in {+63}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g) (1981De03). 
MR$Other: 0.00 {I+2-20} (1977Mo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.36 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I9} (1977Mo20). 
M$from |g(|q) in (1977Mo20). 
MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.07 {I+10-20} from |g(|q) in (1977Mo20). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR calculated from |a(K)exp in {+69}As |e decay; others: +0.58 {I+30-15} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,n|g) and +0.27 {I4} from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,n|g). +1.0 {I3} from (|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of +0.11 {I1} from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,n|g) and +0.09 {I3} in {+66}Zn(|a,n|g). Other: +0.03 {I3} from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM3;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM3W
decay_comment:
M Q+O from |g(|q) in {+69}Ga(p,n|g); parity from RUL. 
CC M3 CC(THEORY)'S MULT. BY 0.975 10 (Cf. 1990Ne01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI there is marked disagreement between the relative branchings observed in the {+66}Zn(|a,n|g) and the {+69}Ga(p,n|g): I|g(994)/I|g(762)=2.4 {I7} in (|a,n|g) and I|g(994)/I|g(762)=0.22 in (p,n|g). It is possible that there is a sizeable contribution to I|g(994) from a 994 |g deexciting the 3749 level, which may have significant population in {+66}Zn(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of -1.43 {I10} from {+69}Ga(p,n|g) and -1.3 {I2} from (HI,xn|g). -1.85 {I4} from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M from |g(|q) and linear-polarization data in {+66}Zn(|a,n|g) 
MR weighted average of +0.45 {I4} from |g(|q) in (HI,xn|g) and +0.58 {I7} from |g(|q) in {+66}Zn(|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$This transition is not included in the least-squares fit for the excitation energies since the energy fit is poor. The least-squares fit gives E|g=518.39 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.08 {I3} and |a(L)exp + |a(M)exp=0.169 {I7} from |a(K)exp/(|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp)=6.4 {I2} (1979Su02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by evaluator based on the ratio of I|g(818)/I|g(414+438)=1.08 {I11} in (|a,n|g). I|g(812)=7.4 {I4} was determined in 1979Su02. Evaluator assumes the I|g=3.2 {I8} difference is for placement elsewhere, probably the 1210 level is being populated here. 
MR -0.13 {I3} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); +0.17 {I11} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average from the {+70}Ge(p,d|g) reaction and {+69}As |e decay (1978TeZY). Placement from 1978TeZY. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 1105.2 {I2} from adopted gammas. Placement from 1978TeZY. 
RI |g not observed in singles, only in |g|g coincidences (1978TeZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Seen in |g|g by 1975Eb05 with I|g/I|g(398|g)=0.04 {I1} at E=16 MeV and 90|'. Not reported by 1977Be65 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$+0.17 {I+11-7} for E1+M2 from |g(|q), 1976Eb02; however, the authors placed all the intensity of the 812|g from the 812 level, and a comparison of branching with data in (|a,n|g) indicate that |?1/2 the intensity belongs with the 1210 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M from linear-polarization data (1976Eb02); lin pol=-0.36 {I5} (1997Be65) 
MR$Other: +0.70 {I+10-7} (1975Eb05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Lin pol=-0.27 {I5} 
M from linear-polarization data (1976Eb02,1997Be65) 
MR$Other: +0.58 {I+7-4} (1975Eb05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The M3 character of this transition indicates that it might be |a decay from a doublet with a different spin (1997Be65) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The M2 character of this transition indicates that it might be |a decay from a doublet with a different spin (1997Be65) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$Branching=2.0 {I4} 
RI$adopted gammas I|g(141): I|g(287)=4.6:100 
|a(L+...)exp=0.0022 {I10} 
M mult is E1 based on |a(K)exp. However, mult=M1 is required by the decay scheme. |a(theory)=0.032(M1), 0.025(E1). Note that |a(exp) is smaller than |a(E1 theory). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching=9 {I2} 
E uncertainty given as 6 keV in 1978Pa15 is assumed by the evaluator to be a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Branching=7 {I2} 
E uncertainty given as 6 keV in 1978Pa15 is assumed by the evaluator to be a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR weighted average of +0.79 {I+10-18} (1979Zo02), +0.65 {I12} (1979Pa13), and +0.76 {I6} (1982Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=13.13 {I11} 
MR weighted average of +0.51 {I5} (1979Zo02), +0.45 {I10} (1979Pa13), and +0.39 {I5} (1982Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.6 {I6} 
Not reported by 1979Pa13. 
RI angular distribution correction is for a pure E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.0 {I13} 
MR weighted average of +0.35 {I15} (1979Pa13), and +0.46 {I6} (1982Pa03) 
MR$Other: -0.05 {I2} (1979Zo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=4.6 {I10} 
$|a(IPF)/T=2.01|*10{+-6} {I3} 
M$Q from |g(|q) (1982Pa03); |p from RUL 
MR$|d(O/Q)=0.03 {I7} (1979Zo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_comment:
$I|g=10.4 {I9} 
$|a(IPF)/T=0.000387 {I6} 
MR$Other: |d(O/Q)=-0.13 {I2} (1979Zo02), -0.01 {I6}(1982Pa03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=9.8 {I14} 
RI not corrected for angular distribution (1979Zo02) 
$|a(IPF)/T=2.38|*10{+-6} {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g=12.9 {I6} 
E$This transition is not included in the least-squares fit for the excitation energies since the energy fit is poor. The least-squares fit gives E|g=518.39 {I4} 
MR$Other: +0.17 {I2} (1979Zo02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR -0.15 {I5} if it is a 25/2 to 27/2 transition; +0.17 {I4} if it is a 29/2 to 27/2 transition (1979Pa13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) and RUL. |d = -0.1 {I2} in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) gives a large B(M3) which is excluded by RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from {+65}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C,2p|g), M1+(E2) from RUL. Other: |d=+3.5 {I9} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,n'|g); I|g(827)/I|g(1495)=76 {I10}/100 {I10}, in (n,n'|g) which ratio is different from the adopted I|g from {+70}As |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D from {+65}Cu({+7}Li,2p|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C,2p|g) based on |DJ = 0 dipole transition; |D|p=no from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) and RUL; |d=-0.2 {I2} in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) gives a large B(M3) which is excluded by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) and RUL. M3 is ruled out because |d=+0.2 {I2} from {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) gives a large B(M3) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From angular distribution in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) and RUL. |d = 0.0 {I2} from |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$From {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a, n|g) and RUL. |d =-0.06 {I3} in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a, n|g) gives a large B(M2). |d: Other: 0.00 {I4} in {+65}Cu({+7}Li, 2n|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C, 2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$From {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a, n|g) and RUL. |d =0.02 {I5} in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a, n|g) gives a large B(M3) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$from angular distribution of oriented nuclei (ADO) radios in {+65}Cu({+7}Li, 2n|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C, 2p|g) (2010Su05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1948|g populates 2+ state according to level scheme given in 2010Su05. Placement of 1948|g is questionable due to |DJ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from angular distribution and linear-polarization data in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) and RUL. |d=-0.2 {I2} is {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) gives a large B(M3) value, M3 is not possible because of RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from angular distribution in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) and RUL. |d=-0.1 {I2} in {+68}Zn(|a,2n|g), {+67}Zn(|a,n|g) gives large B(M3). RUL rules out M3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$from R(DCO) in {+64}Ni({+12}C,|a2n|g). From T{-1/2} considerations, M2 is more likely. However, assignment to a band structure in {+64}Ni({+12}C,|a2n|g) suggests E2 character. Other: D in {+65}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C,2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$Q from angular distribution of oriented nuclei (ADO) ratio in {+65}Cu({+7}Li,2n|g),{+60}Ni({+12}C,2p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$from Angular Distribution of Oriented nuclei (ADO) ratio in {+65}Cu({+7}Li, 2n|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C, 2p|g) and level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q in {+65}Cu({+7}Li, 2n|g), {+60}Ni({+12}C, 2p|g) and {+64}Ni({+12}C,|a2n|g), assumed E2 from placement in band structure. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$from I(|g+ce)(1215|g)/I(|g+ce)(176|g)=1.4|*10{+-2} {I7} (1958Al01) 
CEK$from internal conversion electrons in coincidence with |b{+-} (1958Al01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The level scheme in 2002Li41 shows that 1707.6 keV level is populated by 449.15|g. Level energy difference requires 445.6|g decays into 1707.6 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Authors of 2002Li41 stated that the placement of the transition was confirmed but level spacing requires 2323.6|g decays into 3046.4 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=26.8 {I23} 
M$|DJ = 0 quadrupole transition based on ADO(1) = 1.01 {I5}, ADO(2)=0.84 {I4}, ADO(3) =0.93 {I5} (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.35 {I4} 
M$|DJ = 0 dipole transition based on ADO(1)=1.28 {I20}, ADO(2)=1.13 {I27}, ADO(3)=1.40 {I23} (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.98 {I11} 
M$|DJ = 0 dipole transition based on ADO(1)=0.90 {I6}, ADO(2)=0.86 {I7}, ADO(3)=0.86 {I6} (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$I|g'=7.5 {I7} 
M$|DJ = 0 dipole transition based on ADO(1)=1.22 {I6}, ADO(2)=1.10 {I6}, ADO(3)=1.14 {I6} (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=1.04 {I9} 
M$other: Q from ADO(1)=1.46 {I17}, ADO(2)=1.67 {I23}, ADO(3)=1.81 {I21} (2010Su05). Other: D+Q from 1977Ro28 based on |d=+0.38 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.18 {I2} 
E$1948|g populates 2156.9 keV 2+ state according to level scheme. Placement of 1948|g is questionable due to |DJ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.72 {I6} 
M$other: |DJ=0 d from ADO(1)=1.27 {I9}, ADO(2)=1.39 {I11}, ADO(3)=1.40 {I10} (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=1.16 {I10} 
E$placement from 2010Su05. 1253|g is placed from a 4551-keV, J=(8) level in 1977Ro28. 
M$ADO(1)=1.21 {I7}, ADO(2)=1.52 {I10}, ADO(3)=1.35 {I8} (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.42 {I4} 
M$ADO(1)=1.39 {I8}, ADO(2)=1.26 {I10}, ADO(3)=1.17 {I8} for 1273 + 1273 unresolved doublet (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$I|g'=0.24 {I4} 
$ADO(1)=1.39 {I8}, ADO(2)=1.26 {I10}, ADO(3)=1.17 {I8} for 1273 + 1273 unresolved doublet (2010Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$very weak |g 
E$populates 3954.7 keV 7- level in 1978Cl05 (Figure 1). From the energy level differences this |g-ray should populate 3666.2 keV 6- level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_comment:
RI$very weak |g 
M$suggested by T{-1/2} of decaying state; |g(|q) could not be measured because of mixing with 1114|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-6 {I+3-10} or -0.6 {I5} from population parameter method using |g(|q) of 1709|g to fix the excited state alignment and the |g(|q) of 668|g to determine |d; -7 {I4} or -0.75 {I25} from Wolfenstein-Hauser-Feshbach statistical model calculations. Sign of |d reversed from that given by 1970Ch15; -10 {I+5-10} (1987Do14) from |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$experimental I(ce(K)) increased by 10% to include L-conversion as determined from 1969Ha61 
$K-conversion decay branch %=0.91 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$experimental I(ce(K)) increased by 10% to include L-conversion as determined from 1969Ha61 
$ce(K)(1091|g)/ce(K)(1268|g)=0.59 {I8} (1985Pa15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$includes pair production 
$I(e{++}-)(2307|g)/ce(K)(1268|g)=1.6 {I5} (1985Pa15) 
$ce(K)(2307|g)/ce(K)(1268|g)=0.35 {I10}; this corresponds to ce(K)(2307|g)/I(1268|g)=6.5|*10{+-5} {I18} and I(e{++}-)(2307|g)/I(1268|g)=3.3|*10{+-4} {I9} (1986PaZR) 
$ce(K)/pair conversion probability=0.20 {I8}; which may be compared with a theoretical ratio=0.212 (1986Pa19,1986Pa23) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Authors (1980Le24) stated that the energy and intensity of this transition taken from (p,p'|g) (1969Hi01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 174.954 {I5} from {+71}As |e decay, 174.9 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 175.05 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 174.9 {I1} from (p,n|g) and (|a,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: I|g=3.0 {I5} for a 324.4 {I1} |g in (p,n|g) is in disagreement. This |g not reported in (n,|g), (|a,n|g) and (|a,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 499.876 {I10} from {+71}As |e decay, 500.0 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 499.966 {I22} from (n,|g) E=th, and 499.9 {I1} from (p,n|g), 499.9 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
MR$+0.11 {I2} or -2.3 {I1} from {+71}As |e decay; +0.18 {I20} or -2.8 {I+11-36} in (p,n|g); +0.12 {I12} or +2.4 {I+11-7} in (|a,n|g); |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) agrees with higher |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 326.785 {I15} from {+71}As |e decay, 326.8 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 326.86 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 326.7 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
$|d(M3/E2)=+0.05 {I6} ({+71}As |e decay), -0.08 {I+9-11} (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 350.163 {I6} from {+71}As |e decay, 350.0 {I2} from (|a,n|g), 350.26 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 350.2 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 12.41 {I30} from {+71}As |e decay, 13.4 {I6} from (|a,n|g), 12.4 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th, and 11.8 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q,t) in {+71}As |e decay. Others: -0.09 {I+11-10} or +2.1 {I+7-5} in (p,n|g); +0.21 {I13} or -2.2 {I+4-7} in (|a,n|g); |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) agrees with dominant E1, also marginally with pure M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 391.383 {I18} from {+71}As |e decay, 391.4 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 391.45 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, 391.2 {I1} from (p,n|g), 391.3 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
MR$weighted average of -0.23 {I4} from {+71}As |e decay, -0.18 {I+4-3} from (p,n|g), and -0.25 {I6} from (|a,n|g). Higher values of -2.9 {I+5-8} in (|a,n|g) and -3.7 {I+5-6} in (p,n|g) are inconsistent with ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 414.39 {I10} from {+71}As |e decay and 414.7 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 4.9 {I5} from (p,n|g) is in disagreement; this |g not reported in (n,|g) and (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). Others: 533.2 {I2} from {+71}As |e decay and 533.18 {I20} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$unweighted average of 7.0 {I7} from {+71}As |e decay, 4.7 {I8} from (|a,n|g), 4.0 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 2.90 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<7.4|*10{+-4} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<3.8 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 708.195 {I5} from {+71}As |e decay, 708.0 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 708.14 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 708.1 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100.0 {I31} from {+71}As |e decay, 100.0 {I8} from (|a,n|g), and 100 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$+0.27 {I11} or -3.1 {I+8-14} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); -2.9 {I+8-14} or +0.19 {I+10-8} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) gives M1 or E2 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0056 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<16 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased three times to 0.015 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$weighted average of 247.351 {I5} from {+71}As |e decay, 247.5 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 247.40 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, 247.3 {I1} from (p,n|g), and 247.3 {I6} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 73.8 {I19} from {+71}As |e decay, 75.0 {I30} from (|a,n|g), 84 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 85 {I5} from (p,n|g). Other: 117 {I20} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
MR$-2.1 {I+3-5} or -0.18 {I7} (p,n|g); -0.07 to -2.14 (|a,n|g); |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) consistent with lower |d for M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 572.255 {I15} from {+71}As |e decay, 572.29 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 572.3 {I1} from (p,n|g). Other: 572.3 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 572.1 {I6} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I4} from (|a,n|g), 100 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th, 100 {I4} from (p,n|g), and 100 {I17} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M,MR$-0.07 or +2.1 {I+4-3} (p,n|g); 0.00 {I18} or +1.3 {I+4-3} (|a,n|g); |a(K)exp in (p,n|g) consistent with M1 or E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 747.28 {I1} from {+71}As |e decay, 747.3 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 747.09 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 747.2 {I1} from (p,n|g). Other: 747.3 {I6} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 61.7 {I19} from {+71}As |e decay, 49 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 58 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 53.0 {I20} from (p,n|g). Other: 60 {I12} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M$|d(O/Q)=-0.14 {I+14-22} or -1.9 {I+7-9} (p,n|g); |DJ=2, Q from (|a,|a,3n|g); E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 308.24 {I4} from {+71}As |e decay, 308.29 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 308.2 {I1} from (p,n|g). Other: 307.9 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 39 {I6} from {+71}As |e decay, 75 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 34 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 82 {I4} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.09 to +2.7 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (p,n|g). E|g=633.440 {I25} from {+71}As decay is not used since its intensity of 161 {I20} is in severe disagreement from those in (p,n|g) and (|a,n|g). This |g not reported in (n,|g) 
RI$weighted average of 54.0 {I30} from (|a,n|g) and 48.0 {I20} from (p,n|g). Other: 161 {I20} from {+71}As |e decay is in severe disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 808.27 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 807.8 {I4} from (|a,n|g), 808.13 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 808.1 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100 {I8} from {+71}As |e decay, 100 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 100 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 241.75 {I13} from (n,|g) E=th and 241.8 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.3 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 4.8 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th, and 2.5 {I3} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 306.217 {I25} from {+71}As |e decay, 306.21 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 306.1 {I1} from (p,n|g). Other: 306.2 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 29 {I4} from {+71}As |e decay, 28.5 {I18} from (|a,n|g), 29.4 {I24} from (n,|g) E=th, and 28.5 {I19} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$|DJ=1, D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) with |d>+0.19; E1+M2 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 331.4 {I2} from {+71}As |e decay, 331.4 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 331.45 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 331.2 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 20.1 {I15} from (|a,n|g), 23.9 {I21} from (n,|g) E=th, and 25.0 {I22} from (p,n|g). Other: 19 {I10} from {+71}As |e decay 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp in (p,n|g). Other: |d(Q/D)<-0.19 from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 831.294 {I10} from {+71}As |e decay, 831.3 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 831.29 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 831.2 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th, and 100.0 {I22} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q with |d from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme. Other: |d(Q/D)=0.00 {I21} or -1.7 {I+5-10} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased four times to 0.028 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$others: 279.61 {I22} from (n,|g) E=th and 279.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 21.6 {I8} from {+71}As |e decay, 12 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 22.5 {I14} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=-0.12 {I+17-19} or +2.5 {I+22-8} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.11 if M1 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<2014 upper limit exceeds RUL=300 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th only; treated as questionable by the evaluators due to no intensity reported and |g not seen in other studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased two times to 0.008 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$weighted average of 526.642 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 526.4 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 526.77 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th, and 526.7 {I1} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I4} from (|a,n|g), 100 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 100.0 {I22} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in |e decay; M1+E2 from level scheme. Others: |d(Q/D)=-0.53 {I+11-44} or -1.07 {I+47-21} (p,n|g), -0.5 {I+4-6} (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 851.63 {I7} from {+71}As |e decay and 851.6 {I2} from (p,n|g). Other: 850.98 {I10} is discrepant 
RI$weighted average of 21.0 {I20} from {+71}As |e decay, 27 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 23.4 {I11} from (p,n|g). Other: 87 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th is discrepant 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in {+71}As |e decay. Others: |d(Q/D)=+0.3 {I+12-2} or +1.0 {I+4-9} (p,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased four times to 0.034 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$others: 1026.6 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 1026.73 {I23} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1026.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 36.2 {I12} from {+71}As |e decay, 34 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 35.3 {I14} from (p,n|g). Other: 29 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th 
M$from |g(|q,t) in |e decay and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 448.1 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 448.0 {I2} from (p,n|g), and 447.9 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g). Other: 448.52 {I10} in |e decay not used in averaging due to I|g=286 {I143} in severe disagreement with others 
RI$unweighted average of 45 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 34.8 {I19} from (p,n|g), and 51 {I8} in (|a,|a3n|g). Other: 286 {I143} from {+71}As |e decay is in severe disagreement 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) and (|a,n|g); M1+E2 from |g(lin pol) in (|a,|a,3n|g) 
MR$weighted average of +0.42 {I8} (p,n|g) and +0.49 {I+5-6} (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 839.3 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 839.5 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 839.2 {I2} from (p,n|g), and 839.0 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 100 {I43} from {+71}As |e decay, 100 {I19} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme. Other: +0.4 {I+1-3} from (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.96 is also possible since 1990Me01 list two different values of relative intensity differing by |?20% 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0086 {I+29-20} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=104 {I+35-24} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 920.49 {I14} from (n,|g) E=th 
RI$unweighted average of 7.4 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay and 12.1 {I16} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$D+Q with |d=+0.36 {I14} or >+3.7 from |g(|q,t) in {+71}As |e decay; |d(Q/D)=+0.11 {I+12-13} or -2.1 {I+5-8} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme. Other: +0.27 {I5} or +22 {+390-11} in {+71}As |e decay 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0039 {I+15-11} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=6.8 {I+26-19} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1095.490 {I10} from {+71}As |e decay, 1096.1 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 1095.42 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1095.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I13} from (|a,n|g) and 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=+0.23 {I2} or -3.20 {I2} from {+71}As |e decay; |d(Q/D)=+0.11 {I+12-13} or -2.1 {I+5-8} from (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.024 {I+7-4} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=29 {I+8-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 596.1 {I5} from (p,n|g), and 596.2 {I6} in (|a,|a3n|g). 596.2 {I3} in (|a,n|g) not used. 
RI$weighted average of 20.8 {I36} from (|a,|a3n|g), and 20 {I6} in (p,n|g). Other: 104 {I9} in (|a,n|g) in severe disagreement 
M$|DJ=2, Q from |g|g(|q)(ADO) in (|a,|a3n|g). Others: |g(|q) in (p,n|g) with |d(O/Q)=+0.05 {I+26-24} or -4.7 to +3.5; E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 921.1 {I2} from {+71}As |e decay, 921.4 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 921.1 {I2} from (p,n|g), and 921.2 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100 {I13} in (|a,|a3n|g); 100 {I8} in (|a,n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,|a3n|g). Others: D+Q, |d=-2.0 {I4} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); |d(Q/D)=-0.10 {I7} or -3.0 {I4}; -0.23 {I+7-8} or -2.0 {I+3-4} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0015 {I+9-5} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=23 {I+13-7} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased four times to 0.16 keV in the fitting procedure 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0030 {I+17-9} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=41 {I+23-12} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q and |d=+0.075 {I15} or -4.3 {I+11-17} from |g(|q,t) in |e decay 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0030 {I+16-8} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=29 {I+15-8} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 431.0 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.56 {I11} from {+71}As |e decay and 2.40 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0013 {I+7-4} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=11 {I+6-3} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased two times to 0.028 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$others: 639.4 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th and 639.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 6.1 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 8.6 {I24} from (|a,n|g), and 6.3 {I7} from (p,n|g). Other: 13.9 {I17} from (n,|g) E=th is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0010 {I+5-3} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=3.6 {I+19-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$other: 964.3 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 8.5 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 12 {I3} from (|a,n|g), and 12.5 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1139.461 {I19} from {+71}As |e decay, 1139.4 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 1139.19 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1139.3 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100.0 {I21} from {+71}As |e decay, 100 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 100 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.45 {I5} or -6.8 {I14} from |g(|q) in {+71}As |e decay; +0.27 {I13} or -3.7 {I+13-34} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M2 component ruled out by RUL 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0029 {I+15-8} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=3.3 {I+17-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 974.1 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g) and 974.2 {I1} in (|a,n|g) 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,|a,3ng); |d(M3/E2)=-0.01 {I2}, |DJ=2 from |g(lin pol) in (|a,n|g) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)>355 exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)>161, as compared to RUL=300 
E$from (|a,n|g) 
M$from |g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(pol) in (|a,|a3n|g); |g(|q,pol) in (|a,n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q,pol) in (|a,n|g). Other: |d(Q/D)=+1.3 {I5} (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 373.8 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 373.91 {I16} from (n,|g) E=th, and 373.7 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 16.2 {I6} from {+71}As |e decay, 20 {I4} from (|a,n|g), 19 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 24 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$|d(Q/D)=0.00 {I14} or <-0.36 (|a,n|g), 0.00 {I11} or -3.1 {I+8-16} (p,n|g); higher |d values excluded by RUL and level scheme; E1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 615.5 {I2} from (|a,n|g), 615.33 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 615.4 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I6} from (|a,n|g), 100 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th, and 100 {I6} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=-0.23 {I+8-9} or -2.6 {I+5-7} from |g(|q,t) in |e decay, |d(Q/D)=-0.14 {I5} or -3.5 {I+6-8} (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.062 {I+22-13} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=2.4|*10{+2} {I+9-5} if E2, upper bound exceeds RUL=300 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 680.0 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 18.4 {I9} from {+71}As |e decay, 13 {I4} from (|a,n|g), and 14.4 {I17} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=+0.07 {I+33-25} or +1.2 {I+13-6} (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0080 {I+29-17} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=26 {I+9-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased two times to 0.020 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$other: 465.2 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 28.8 {I8} from {+71}As |e decay, 25 {I8} from (|a,n|g), and 26.3 {I19} from (p,n|g) 
MR$-0.36 to +5.7 for |d(Q/D) from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.017 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<118 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 504.28 {I5} from {+71}As |e decay and 504.1 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 53 {I15} from {+71}As |e decay, 42 {I17} from (|a,n|g), and 47 {I14} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=+0.31 {I+27-24} or -4.3 to +3.7 from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.026 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<152 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 712.2 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 712.7 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I14} (|a,n|g) and 100 {I8} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=-0.19 {I+9-11} or -1.8 {I+4-5} from |g(|q,t) in |e decay; |d(Q/D)=-2.5 to -0.12 (|a,n|g); -0.21 {I+14-15} or -2.4 {I+8-23} (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.017 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<49 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 1037.0 {I10} from (|a,n|g) and 1037.7 {I3} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 62.1 {I15} from {+71}As |e decay, 64 {I14} from (|a,n|g), and 70 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=-0.10 {I6} or +2.1 {I3} from |g(|q,t) in |e decay; |d(Q/D)=-0.5 to +19 (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)<0.0034 if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)<4.7 if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$others: 1212.3 {I5} from (|a,n|g) and 1212.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 85.6 {I23} from {+71}As |e decay and 82 {I3} from (p,n|g). Other: 137 {I15} from (|a,n|g) is discrepant 
M$|DJ=2, quadrupole from |g(|q,t) in |e decay; |d(O/Q)=-0.12 {I+19-24} or -1.9 {I+7-12} from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 580.10 {I8} from (n,|g) E=th and 580.5 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 53 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th is discrepant, considering I(580|g)/I(789|g)=0.15 {I2} from another work (2002Ka51) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th. Others: 788.5 {I3} from (|a,n|g) and 788.7 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 100 {I10} from (n,|g) E=th 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 797.6 {I4} from (|a,n|g), 798.3 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th, and 798.9 {I3} from (p,n|g). |g not reported in {+71}As decay. 
RI$unweighted average of 14.1 {I20} from (n,|g)E=th and 9.4 {I9} from (p,n|g). Other: 36 {I11} from (|a,n|g) is in severe disagreement 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0095 {I+32-23} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=22 {I+8-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1298.729 {I15} from {+71}As |e decay, 1298.0 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 1298.56 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1298.7 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 100 {I16} from (|a,n|g), and 100 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th 
M,MR$D+Q and |d=+0.034 {I25} or -1.87 {I11} from {+71}As |e decay; |d(Q/D)=+0.02 {I+19-25} or -1.8 {I+7-15} (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.019 {I+5-3} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=16.3 {I+45-29} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1202.5 {I5} from (|a,n|g), 1204.5 {I2} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1204.2 {I10} from (p,n|g). Other: tentative 1202.26 {I5} from {+71}As |e decay 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: I|g(1378)/I|g(1204)=100 {I9}/23 {I5} in (n,|g); 61 {I28}/100 {I50} in {+71}As decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1379.0 {I5} from {+71}As |e decay, 1377.3 {I6} from (|a,n|g), 1378.66 {I7} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1378.7 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: I|g(1378)/I|g(1204)=100 {I9}/23 {I5} in (n,|g); 61 {I28}/100 {I50} in {+71}As decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 914.7 {I20} from (p,n|g) with I(915|g)/I(1415|g)=20:100 from (p,n|g) is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1416.00 {I21} from (n,|g) E=th and 1414.5 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from (n,|g) E=th. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 675.0 {I2} in (p,n|g), 675.1 {I3} from (|a,n|g), and 674.9 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 26 {I5} from (p,n|g), 15.7 {I19} in (|a,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1247.1 {I1} in (p,n|g), 1247.3 {I3} in (|a,n|g), and 1247.0 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g), 1247.0 {I1} in |e decay 
RI$from (p,n|g). Others: 100 {I6} in (|a,n|g), 100 {I12} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(pol) in (|a,|a3n|g); |g(|q,pol) in (|a,n|g). 
MR$d(M3/E2)=-0.06 {I6} from |g(|q,pol) in (|a,n|g). Other: |d(O/Q)=+0.15 {I10} in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 885.97 {I17} from (n,|g) E=th and 887.6 {I10} from (p,n|g). It is possible that this |g is the same as 887.4 from 1479, 11/2+ level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 887.4 {I1} in (|a,n|g), 887.0 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 86 {I6} in (|a,n|g), 98 {I18} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M$|DJ=2, Q+O with |d=0.07 {I5} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); |g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(pol) in (|a,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1278.5 {I1} in (|a,n|g), 1278.1 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I17} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M$D+Q with |d=+4.8 {I10} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g); |DJ=1, dipole from |g|g(|q)(ADO) in (|a,|a3n|g); M1+E2 from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased two times to 0.046 keV in the fitting procedure 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0082 {I+38-20} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=6.8 {I+31-16} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased two times to 0.06 keV in the fitting procedure 
E$weighted average of 1033.542 {I17} from {+71}As |e decay, 1034.2 {I2} from (|a,n|g), 1033.7 {I3} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1033.7 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
M,MR$D+Q and |d from |g(|q,t) in |e decay; M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1098.64 {I7} from {+71}As |e decay and 1098.54 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th. Other: 1098.5 {I5} from (|a,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I9} from (n,|g) E=th 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.016 {I+6-4} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=20 {I+8-4} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 1423.59 {I21} from (n,|g) E=th and 1424.1 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 21 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0017 {I+7-4} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.22 {I+48-27} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1598.505 {I25} from {+71}As |e decay, 1598.22 {I18} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1599.0 {I20} from (p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 28.9 {I15} from {+71}As |e decay and 27 {I4} from (n,|g) E=th 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0015 {I+6-4} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=0.86 {I+34-20} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 935.175 {I14} from {+71}As |e decay, 935.38 {I11} from (n,|g) E=th, and 935.2 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 156 {I20} from (n,|g) E=th is discrepant 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.024 {I+13-7} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=40 {I+22-11} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 32 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay and 36 {I7} from (p,n|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0070 {I+39-20} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=10 {I+6-3} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$others: 1743.2 {I6} from (n,|g) E=th and 1743.7 {I10} from (p,n|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I34} from (n,|g) E=th 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (p,n|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0040 {I+22-11} if M1. B(E2)(W.u.)=1.9 {I+11-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$reported as tentative in (n,|g) only with an intensity six times that of a 1618|g (presumably the same as 1617.1|g given here). A line with this intensity should have been seen in |e decay. It is possible that 444.8|g defines another level near 1792 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1617.12 {I3} from {+71}As |e decay, 1618.0 {I5} from (n,|g) E=th, and 1617.4 {I20} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$36 {I22} is also possible since in |e decay, values listed in table I and level-scheme figure 1 of 1990Me01 differ by a factor of 10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 767.4 {I1} in (|a,n|g), 767.1 {I3} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,|a3n|g). Other: 100 {I13} in (|a,n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), and |g|g(|q)(ADO) in (|a,|a3n|g) 
MR$from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 786.8 {I3} in (|a,n|g), 786.9 {I6} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,|a3n|g). Other: 139 {I26} in (|a,n|g) for an uncertain |g 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) in (|a,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=th. 
E$poor fit, energy uncertainty increased two times to 0.44 keV in the fitting procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$average of 1126.6 {I1} in (|a,n|g), 1126.3 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(lin pol) in (|a,|a3n|g); |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) with |d(O/Q)=0.00 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1122.0 {I2} in (|a,n|g) and 1121.6 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,|a3n|g). Other: 100 {I14} in (|a,n|g) 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(pol) in (|a,|a3n|g); |g(|q) with |d(O/Q)=-0.06 {I5} in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1141.0 {I10} in (|a,n|g) and 1141.3 {I6} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,|a3n|g). Other: 70 {I30} in (|a,n|g) 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) in (|a,|a3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 926.8 {I3} in (|a,n|g) and 926.9 {I1} in (|a,|a3n|g) 
RI$from (|a,|a3n|g) 
M$|g|g(|q)(ADO) and |g(pol) in (|a,|a3n|g); |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) with |d(O/Q)=0.00 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.322 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I10}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.303 {I9}. 
$|a(K)exp=0.095 (1955Gr08), 0.07 (1954Th36). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=264 {I53} (1971Mu14), obtained from their |g-ray data and ce data of 1955Gr08. 
RI$0.0226 {I13} (1990Me01, from table I, note that in authors' level-scheme figure 1, value is listed as 0.011). The value in table I of 1990Me01 is in agreement with 0.023 {I5} in 1971Mu14. 
$ce(K)(175|g)/ce(K)(23|g)|?10; K/(L+M)|?1 (1955Gr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.221 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.018 {I21}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.208 {I17}. 
M$D+Q; |d=+0.11 {I2} or -2.3 {I1} (1987Br24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|d(M3/E2)=+0.05 {I6}. 
$A{-2}=-0.178 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I25}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.165 {I20}. 
$U{-2}A{-2}=-0.155 {I9} (1987Br24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
MR$deduced by 1993Ha08 using their |g(|q) data and those from 1987Br24. 
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I26}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.19 {I25}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=633.273 
RI$0.018 {I2} based on adopted branching ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
RI$from level-scheme Fig. 1 in 1990Me01, 0.002 in E|g, I|g authors' Table I seems a misprint in view of comparison of branching ratios with other reactions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.40 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I12}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.38 {I10}. 
$U{-2}A{-2}=+0.31 {I12} (1987Br24). 
MR$+0.27 {I5} or +22 {I+390-11} (1987Br24); +0.36 {I14} or >+3.7 (1993Ha08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-3.31 {I4} or +0.234 {I4} (1987Br24); +0.23 {I2} or -3.20 {I2} (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=+0.077 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I24}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.072 {I20}. 
$U{-2}A{-2}=+0.048 {I5} (1987Br24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.075 {I15} or -4.3 {I+11-17} (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=+0.08 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I10}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.08 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.22 {I6}. 
$U{-2}A{-2}=-0.30 {I3} (1987Br24). 
MR$+0.50 {I3} or -17 {I+5-10} (1987Br24); +0.45 {I5} or -6.8 {I14} (1993Ha08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from level-scheme figure 1 of 1990Me01, incorrectly shown to decay from 1205 level; |g not listed in authors' table I. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$quoted uncertainty of 0.002 is considered by the evaluators as unrealistic. It is increased to 0.010. 
MR$-0.23 {I+8-9} or -2.6 {I+5-7} (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=-0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I11}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.16 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$quoted uncertainty of 0.001 is considered by the evaluators as unrealistic. It is increased to 0.010. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.19 {I+9-11} or -1.8 {I+4-5} (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=+0.75 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I19}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.70 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.10 {I6} or +2.1 {I3} (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.31 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.034 {I25} or -1.87 {I11} (1987Br24); +0.04 {I3} or -1.88 {I11} (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.4 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.21 {I23}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$from table I of 1990Me01, listed as 0.026 in authors' level-scheme figure 1. The value of 0.026 is less likely, since in that case it would have been seen in other reactions where 1406 level is populated. 
E$the placement is treated as questionable by the evaluators since part or all of it could also be contributed by coincidental summing, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=1033.620 
MR$-0.26 to +3.0 (1993Ha08). 
$A{-2}=-0.33 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.1 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.31 {I24}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.12 {I12} or +2.4 {I+11-7} from |g(|q) (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.21 {I13} or -2.2 {I+4-7} from |g(|q) (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-0.34 {I14} (1974Fo12); -0.23 {I+5-6} or -2.9 {I+5-8} (1977Ke16); weighted average of -0.23 {I6} (1977Ke16) and -0.34 {I14} (1974Fo12) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.27 {I11} or -3.7 {I+11-26} (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 76 {I2} (1975EbZZ) and 66 {I5} (1977Ke16) 
MR$-2.14 to -0.07 (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} for (247|g)(500|g)(|q) (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+1.3 {I+4-3} or 0.00 {I18} (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 
RI$100 {I4} (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 44 {I3} (1975EbZZ) and 54.6 {I24} (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$+0.09 to +2.7 (1977Ke16) 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 
$A{-2}=-0.32 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I12}; A{-2}=+0.32 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I11} for (308|g)(500|g)(|q) (1977Ke16) in two geometries 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 
$A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6}; A{-2}=+0.03 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} for (306|g)(327|g)(|q) (1977Ke16) in two geometries 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from 1977Ke16 
$First set of |g(|q) data at E|a=8.0 MeV, second at 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 
$A{-2}=-0.65 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3}; A{-2}=-0.30 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I4} for (526|g)(500|g)(|q) (1977Ke16) in two geometries 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$from |g|g coincidence (1974Fo12). 
MR$from |g(|q) (1974Fo12) 
$I|g(448)/I|g(840)=16/28 (1974Fo12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from 1977Ke16 
RI$8% of the 921|g line is estimated to be from the 1096.1 level (1977Ke16) 
$In the level scheme of 1977Ke16, the transition connects the unresolved 1096 keV level with the 198 keV rather than the 175 keV. 
$First set of |g(|q) for E|a=8.0 MeV, second for 8.5 MeV (1977Ke16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LE
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LE
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$+1.45 {I+14-18} (1974Fo12); +1.04 {I2} (1976Eb02). Adopted |d from unweighted average of the two values. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
MR$-2.5 to -0.12 (1977Ke16) 
$A{-2}=-0.48 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I4}; A{-2}=-0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I8} for (712|g)(500|g)(|q) (1977Ke16) in two geometries 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LE
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$I|g(887)/I|g(1278)=17/18 (1974Fo12) is in agreement with adopted value 
$|d(O/Q)=+0.07 {I11} from |g(|q) (1974Fo12); -0.07 {I+4-5} from |g(|q) (1976Eb02) 
RI$other: I|g(887)/I|g(1278)=50 {I2}/50 {I2} (1976Eb02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LE
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LE
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of +6.9 {I+20-13} from |g(|q) (1974Fo12), and +4.4 {I+6-7} from |g(|q) (1976Eb02). Other: 0.4 from 1976Eb02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Uncertain |g shown only in level scheme figure 11 of 1974Fo12; a 1760.9|g is placed from this level in (|a,|a3n|g) (2022Wa21) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$This |g is not reported in {+74}Ge(|a,|a3n|g) study; not included in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=174.7 {I1}, relative I|g=673 {I14} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
ECC,EKC$from 1970RoZX; other: |a(exp)=1.2|*10{+-1} {I3} (1962Re09) 
$There seems a misprint in |a(L)exp+|a(M)exp=1.12|*10{+-1} in 1975On01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=499.8 {I2}, relative I|g=321.1 {I73} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-2.8 {I+11-36} or +0.18 {I20} (1974Ma32); |a(K)exp agrees with higher |d 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.03 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=326.3 {I1}, relative I|g=227.3 {I51} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-2.05 {I+25-31} or +0.05 {I+6-5} (1974Ma32), +0.10 {I+5-2} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
$E|g=350.3 {I1}, relative I|g=28.0 {I17} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(350)/I|g(326)=0.107 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.123 {I8} (1975On01) 
MR$-0.09 {I+11-10} or +2.1 {I+7-5} (1974Ma32), |a(K)exp agrees with lower |d. |a(K)exp marginally agrees with pure M1 also 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.03 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=391.4 {I1}, relative I|g=223.8 {I53} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-3.7 {I+5-6} or -0.18 {I+4-3} (1974Ma32); -0.11 {I+3-2} (2002Ka51) |a(K)exp agrees with lower |d value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=533.6 {I4}, relative I|g=3.6 (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(533)/I|g(708)=0.054 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.029 (1975On01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=708.4 {I1}, relative I|g=111.9 {I39} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-2.9 {I+8-14} or +0.19 {I+10-8} (1974Ma32), -0.6 {I+8-22} (2002Ka51); |a(K)exp gives M1 or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=247.3 {I1}, relative I|g=50.4 {I20} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(247)/I|g(572)=0.66 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.91 {I6} (1975On01) 
MR$-2.1 {I+3-5} or -0.18 {I7} (1974Ma32); |a(K)exp consistent with lower |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=572.3 {I1}, relative I|g=55.2 {I29} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-0.07 {I7} or +2.1 {I+4-3} (1974Ma32), -0.30 {I+5-8} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=747.5 {I1}, relative I|g=23.2 {I23} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(747)/I|g(572)=0.48 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.42 {I5} (1975On01) 
MR$-1.9 {I+7-9} or -0.14 {I+14-22} (1974Ma32) 
$|a(K)exp=7.1|*10{+-4} {I77} (1975On01); M2 assignment in table II of 1975On01 is inconsistent with E2 from |D(J|p) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=308.6 {I3}, relative I|g=15.7 (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(308)/I|g(808)=0.73 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.55 (1975On01) 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.03 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=632.9 {I2}, relative I|g=15.3 {I25} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(633)/I|g(808)=0.57 {I3} (2002Ka51), 0.53 {I10} (1975On01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=306.4 {I1}, relative I|g=35.7 {I18} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(306)/I|g(831)=0.290 {I6} (2002Ka51), 0.357 {I18} (1975On01) 
MR$+0.10 {I+5-2} or -12 {I+4-3} (2002Ka51); higher |d implies M2 which is unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$E|g=331.3 {I1}, relative I|g=10.3 {I12} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(331)/I|g(831)=0.240 {I5} (2002Ka51), 0.103 {I12} (1975On01) 
MR$from |a(K)exp=6.8|*10{+-3} {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=831.5 {I2}, relative I|g=100.0 (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$from 1974Ma32. Other: -0.5 {I1} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=279.1 {I3}, relative I|g=5.0 {I12} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(279)/I|g(527)=0.191 {I13} (2002Ka51), 0.13 {I3} (1975On01) 
MR$-0.12 {I+17-19} or +2.5 {I+22-8} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=526.8 {I1}, relative I|g=39.8 {I22} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-1.07 {I+47-21} or -0.53 {I+11-44} (1974Ma32); -0.75 {I+14-12} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=852.6 {I4}, relative I|g=8.5 {I24} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(852)/I|g(527)=0.18 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.21 {I6} (1975On01) 
MR$+0.3 {I+12-2} or +1.0 {I+4-9} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$I|g(1027)/I|g(527)=0.35 {I2} (2002Ka51) 
MR$|d(O/Q)=-0.7 {I+4-7} (1974Ma32); |d=+12.5 {I3} (2002Ka51) is not possible for 5/2- to 1/2- transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=448.2 {I3}, relative I|g=9.2 {I12} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV, placed from 1543 level only) 
MR$from 1999Iv08. Other: +0.29 {I4} or +11 {I+8-3} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=839.6 {I2}, relative I|g=27.2 {I25} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV, unplaced) 
MR$+0.10 {I18} (1999Iv08), -0.05 {I+5-6} or +0.9 {I+14-12} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-2.1 {I+5-8} or +0.11 {I+12-13} (1974Ma32) 
E$weak |g rays are present whose intensities could not be estimated because of background or proximity to other strong gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=596.5 {I1} assigned to {+74}Ge(n,n'|g) in 1975On01 
RI$1974Ma32 have used the branching ratios of 1971Mu14 to analyze the 596-keV |g line which probably contains a component from the decay of the 1095.46-keV level. 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.03 MeV 
M,MR$|d(O/Q)=+0.05 {I+26-24} or -4.7 to +3.5 (1974Ma32). Other: |d(O/Q)=0.14 {I+48-32} or 2.05 to 4.01 (1974Ma32), if 7/2+ for 1096 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$1974Ma32 have used the branching ratios of 1971Mu14 to analyze the 921-keV |g line which probably contains a component from the decay of the 1095.46-keV line. 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.03 MeV (1974Ma32) 
MR$-2.0 {I+3-4} or -0.23 {I+7-8} (1974Ma32); -3.0 {I4} or -0.10 {I7} (1999Iv08); -1.0 {I+6-8} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=374.4 {I2}, relative I|g=6.9 {I13} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(374)/I|g(615)=0.20 {I4} (1975On01) 
MR$-3.1 {I+8-16} or 0.00 {I11} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=615.6 {I1}, relative I|g=33.8 {I23} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
MR$-3.5 {I+6-8} or -0.14 {I5} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=679.7 {I4}, relative I|g=3.1 {I17} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(680)/I|g(615)=0.09 {I5} (1975On01) 
MR$+0.07 {I+33-25} or +1.2 {I+13-6} (1974Ma32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=465.4 {I4}, relative I|g=3.4 {I12} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(465)/I|g(713)=0.25 {I2} (2002Ka51), 0.21 {I7} (1975On01) 
MR$-0.36 to +5.7 (1974Ma32) 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.03 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LE;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
$I|g(504)/I|g(713)=0.46 {I3} (2002Ka51) 
MR$+0.31 {I+27-24} or -4.3 to +3.7 (1974Ma32) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)<2865 (1999Iv08), in contrast to RUL=300 for B(E2)(W.u.) 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.71 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$E|g=712.8 {I2}, relative I|g=16.5 {I20} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV, doublet placed from 1212 and 1543 levels) 
MR$-2.4 {I+8-23} or -0.21 {I+14-15} (1974Ma32); -0.49 {I+9-26} or -1.5 {I2} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=798.8 {I2}, relative I|g=9.2 {I23} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(799)/I|g(1299)=0.091 {I13} (2002Ka51) 
$|g(|q) at E(p)=2.71 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=824.5 {I3}, relative I|g=4.6 {I22} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
$I|g(824)/I|g(518)=0.325 {I11} (2002Ka51), 0.27 (1975On01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
MR$|d(Q/D)=+2.9 {I1} for J(1378)=5/2 (2002Ka51) cannot be obtained from quoted A{-2} and A{-4} values. 
E$this |g not seen in |e decay and other reactions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$branching ratio given by 2002Ka51 is much higher than in Adopted Levels, Gammas. Note that the main placement of this |g ray is from 1288 level. It seems 2002Ka51 have not properly accounted for the two placements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=855.7 {I4}, relative I|g=7.2 {I23} (1975On01, at E(p)=5.0 MeV) 
E$855.7 {I4} (1975On01) 
E$questionable |g not included in Adopted Levels, Gammas' 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(1232)/I|g(659)=0.76 {I6} (2002Ka51) 
MR$+0.58 {I15} or +3.2 {I4} (1999Iv08); +0.49 {I+15-11} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
E$unassigned 1247.5|g with I|g=4 in 1970Ma09 
MR$+0.15 {I10} or +7.0 {I7} (1999Iv08); +0.10 {I7} (2002Ka51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
ECC$From I|g(175)/I|g(23)=190 {I37} and the requirement of an intensity balance at the 175 level(1971Mu14); |a(exp)=206 {I40} from 1971Mu14 who use |a(175|g)=0.086 
M$M2 from |a(exp) and T{-1/2} (1971Mu14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$Q+O from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; Q in (|a,2n|g). M2 excluded by RUL. 
MR$|b(M3)(W.u.) from RUL suggests |d|?0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.013 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.011 {I1} (1968Ca20) and 0.0087 {I7} (2001Me01). 
E$weighted average of 142.54 {I6} (1971Re04), 142.5 {I1} (1968Ca20) and 142.719 {I35} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 834.02 {I3} (1971Re04), 833.95 {I5} (1968Ca20), 834.026 {I34} (1974Ch07) and 834.170 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$if authors' value of 1.6|*10{+-4} is a misprint and should be 1.6|*10{+-3}. If |a(K)(834|g)=4.93|*10{+-4} (E2 theory) is used instead of 5.6|*10{+-4} (1971Re04), then |a(K)exp(629.9|g)=1.4|*10{+-3} {i1}, which indicates a pure E2 transition. 
MR$from |g|g(|q) of 630-834 cascade (1974Ch07). Other value: |d|>60 or |<-60 (1969Mo23). 
M$1974Ch07 determined the E0 content to be <2% from |g|g(|q). 
RI$weighted average of 26.4 {I8} (1971Re04), 25.50 {I67}(1968Ca20), 27.38 20 (2001Me01) and 27.38 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 629.86 {I4} (1971Re04), 629.9 {I1} (1968Ca20), 629.956 {I36} and 629.979 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.045 {I9} (1971Re04), 0.0301 {I15} (2001Me01) and 0.024 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 772 {I1} (1971Re04), 772.6 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 772.643 {I27} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 3.7 {I1} (1971Re04), 3.717 {I78} (1968Ca20), 3.763 31 (2001Me01) and 3.786 {I12} (2004Mi10) 
E$from (2001Me01); other: 1464.0 {I1} (1971Re04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q+O
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) of 894-834 cascade, 1974Ch07. |d=-0.086 {i25} (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 10.4 {I3} (1971Re04), 10.30 {I22} (1968Ca20), 10.63 4 (2001Me01) and 10.620 {I15} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 894.22 {I5} (1971Re04), 894.2 {I1} (1968Ca20), 894.254 {I94} (1974Ch07) and 894.336 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.112 {I3} (1968Ca20), 0.1308 13 (2001Me01) and 0.131 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 336.3 {I3} (1971Re04), 336.6 {I2} (1968Ca20), 336.632 42 (1974Ch07) and 336.696 {I19} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$<-24 (1974Ch07), |d large (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 5.7 {I2} (1971Re04), 5.84 {I14} (1968Ca20), 6.13 {I5} (2001Me01) and 6.102 {I13} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 600.85 {I3} (1971Re04), 600.9 {I1} (1968Ca20), 600.948 {I28} (1974Ch07) and 600.916 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 1.53 {I4}(1971Re04), 1.513 {I32} (1968Ca20), 1.513 10 (2001Me01) and 1.487 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1230.86 {I7} (1971Re04), 1230.9 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1230.934 {I13} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$proposed placement of 1968Ca20, not in 1971Re04. 
RI$weighted average of 0.080 {I3} (1968Ca20), 0.0707 {I33} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.090 {I9} (1971Re04), 0.208 {I7} (1968Ca20), 0.1739 24 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 1567.9 {I4} (1971Re04), 1568.2 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 1568.071 {I20} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.40 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.19 {I6} (2001Me01) and 0.415 5 (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1710.9 {I2} (1971Re04), and 1710.33 {I8} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.39 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.376 {I11} (1968Ca20), 0.3915 27 (2001Me01) 0.380 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 735.9 {I2} (1971Re04), 735.6 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 735.694 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.84 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.832 {I24} (1968Ca20), 0.851 4 (2001Me01), 0.831 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 999.86 {I6} (1971Re04), 999.9 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 999.995 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.034 {I6} (1971Re04), 0.025 {I4} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 1630 {I1} (1971Re04) and 1629.90 {I22} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.006 {I3} (1971Re04), 0.011 {I1} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 50.89 {I5} (1971Re04) and 50.87 {I5} (1968Ca20) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I5} (1971Re04), 0.142 {I6} (1968Ca20), 0.079 {I5} (2001Me01), 0.158 {I9} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 112.52 {I3} (1971Re04), 112.50 {I5} (1968Ca20) and 112.715 {I32} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.092 {I6} (1968Ca20), 0.1210 19 (2001Me01), 0.098 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 449.6 {I3} (1971Re04), 449.5 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 449.840 {I16} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$from 1969Mo23 
RI$weighted average of 3.41 {I9} (1971Re04), 3.31 {I7} (1968Ca20), 3.532 {I16} (2001Me01), 3.493 {I9} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 786.4 {I1} (1971Re04), 786.5 {I1} (1968Ca20), 786.438 83 and 786.529 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) measurements (1974Ch07). -0.01 {i16} from 1969Mo23 
RI$weighted average of 7.2 {I2} (1971Re04), 7.24 {I15} (1968Ca20), 7.32 {I4} (2001Me01), 7.325 {I12} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1050.69 {I6} (1971Re04), 1050.7 {I1} (1968Ca20) and 1050.800 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 1.04 {I4} (1971Re04), 0.907 {I24} (1968Ca20), 0.96 {I1} (2001Me01), 0.955 {I6} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1680.77 {I8} (1971Re04), 1680.8 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1680.741 {I15} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.25 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.264 {I10} (1968Ca20), 0.334 7 (2001Me01), 0.259 {I3} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2515.6 {I5} (1971Re04), 2514.6 {I4} (1968Ca20) and 2514.857 {I19} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.035 {I7}(1971Re04), 0.015 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.0123 7 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2583.5 {I4} (1971Re04), 2582.2 {I12} (1968Ca20) and 2582.37 {I6} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.15 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.166 {I5} (1968Ca20), 0.176 {I4} (2001Me01), 0.153 {I6} (2004Mi10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$may be (M1+E2) from pair-conversion measurements of 2937 {i5} transition (1968Be56). 
RI$weighted average of 0.011 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.0154 {I6} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2939.6 {I4} (1968Ca20) and 2940.19 {I6} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.23 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.192 {I8} (1968Ca20), 0.2306 19 (2001Me01), 0.212 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 428.3 {I3} (1971Re04), 428.4 {I2} (1968Ca20), 428.42 18 and 428.649 {I15} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.090 {I6} (1968Ca20), 0.1071 20 (2001Me01), 0.097 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 479.1 {I3} (1971Re04), 479.6 {I3} (1968Ca20), 479.228 98 and 479.461 {I17} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.079 {I8} (1971Re04), 0.074 {I7} (1968Ca20), 0.0705 17 (2001Me01), 0.055 {I3} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 878.0 {I4} (1971Re04), 878.4 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 878.522 {I20} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23), |d>0 (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 0.82 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.833 {I22} (1968Ca20), 0.863 6 (2001Me01), 0.844 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1215.16 {I8} (1971Re04), 1215.1 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1215.139 {I13} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 1.12 {I3} (1971Re04), 1.081 {I23} (1968Ca20), 1.147 17 (2001Me01), 1.143 {I8} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2109.5 {I1} (1971Re04), 2109.5 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 2109.356 {I17} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.066 {I7} (1971Re04), 0.054 {I4} (1968Ca20), 0.0638 20 (2001Me01), 0.048 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 520.8 {I4} (1971Re04), 520.7 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 520.851 {I19} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 1.14 {I3} (1971Re04), 1.155 {I24} (1968Ca20), 1.163 6 (2001Me01), 1.151 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 970.54 {I6} (1971Re04), 970.6 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 970.772 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.84 {I3} (1971Re04), 0.873 {I25} (1968Ca20), 0.897 9 (2001Me01), 0.858 {I6} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1571.5 {I2} (1971Re04), 1571.7 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1571.600 {I14} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
M$E1 is preferred to M1 radiation by the pair-conversion measurements of 1968Be56 and circular polarization data (1971Be31) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 26.8 {I8} (1971Re04), 27.27 {I57} (1968Ca20), 28.2 {I5} (2001Me01), 28.19 {I9} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2201.67 {I8} (1971Re04), 2201.6 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 2201.582 {I17} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
M$from pair-conversion measurements (1968Be56) 
RI$weighted average of 0.004 {I2}(1971Re04), 0.005 {I1} (1968Ca20). Other: 0.0201 {I8} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.026 {I8} (1971Re04), 0.017 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0170 6 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 3093.9 {I7} (1971Re04), 3093.7 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 3094.39 {I10} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.024 {I7} (1968Ca20), 0.0284 {I8} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 230.6 {I6} (1968Ca20) and 231.06 {I3} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.18 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.210 {I7} (1968Ca20), 0.2131 14 (2001Me01), 0.191 {I3} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 289.3 {I3} (1971Re04), 289.5 {I2} (1968Ca20), 289.313 66 (1974Ch07) and 289.53 {I2} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.28 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.289 {I8} (1968Ca20), 0.3211 17 (2001Me01), 0.312 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 381.2 {I2} (1971Re04), 381.2 {I2} (1968Ca20), 381.242 80 (1974Ch07) and 381.694 {I17} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 2.10 {I9} (1971Re04), 2.10 {I5} (1968Ca20), 2.201 {I10} (2001Me01), 2.182 {I6} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 810.24 {I9} (1971Re04), 810.2 {I2} (1968Ca20), 810.195 {I88} (1974Ch07) and 810.335 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.96 {I3} (1971Re04), 0.963 {I26} (1968Ca20), 0.987 5 (2001Me01), 0.983 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 861.11 {I5} (1971Re04), 861.0 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 861.184 {I12} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 1.15 {I3} (1971Re04), 1.200 {I25} (1968Ca20), 1.244 8 (2001Me01), 1.220 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1260.10 {I8} (1971Re04), 1260.1 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1260.124 {I13} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 4.5 {I4} (1971Re04), 4.43 {I9} (1968Ca20), 4.58 {I4} (2001Me01), 4.605 {I13} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1596.65 {I9} (1971Re04), 1596.8 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1596.735 {I14} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 5.5 {I1} (1971Re04), 5.47 {I12} (1968Ca20), 5.67 {I7} (2001Me01), 5.684 {I19} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1861.09 {I8} (1971Re04), 1861.1 {I1} (1968Ca20) and 1860.990 {I16} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$E1 is preferred to M1 radiation by the pair-conversion measurements of 1968Be56. 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 8.1 {I2} (1971Re04), 8.3 {I2} (1968Ca20), 8.10 {I3} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2490.98 {I8} (1971Re04), 2491.0 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 2491.029 {I18} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.012 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.016 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.0185 6 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2633.8 {I4} (1971Re04), 2634.0 {I7} (1968Ca20) and 2633.57 {I4} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.004 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.003 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.0081 5 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 3324.4 {I5} (1971Re04), 3325.0 {I6} (1968Ca20) and 3325.35 {I11} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.003 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.0047 {I4} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 3338.3 {I7} (1968Ca20) and 3338.55 {I15} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.022 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0259 {I9} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 306.0 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 306.19 {I23} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.034 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0180 {I7} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 401.3 {I4} (1968Ca20) and 402.03 {I4} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.11 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.130 {I4} (1968Ca20), 0.1493 15 (2001Me01), 0.122 {I6} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 587.9 {I4} (1971Re04), 587.4 {I3} (1968Ca20), 587.44 24 (1974Ch07) and 587.450 {I21} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.27 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.271 {I7} (1968Ca20), 0.2937 28 (2001Me01), 0.308 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 939.35 {I8} (1971Re04), 939.4 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 939.648 {I16} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 1.63 {I2} (1971Re04), 1.646 {I34} (1968Ca20), 1.669 11 (2001Me01), 1.665 {I6} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1276.75 {I8} (1971Re04), 1276.8 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1276.798 {I13} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.24 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.242 {I6} (1968Ca20), 0.244 {I4} (2001Me01), 0.230 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1878.0 {I3} (1971Re04), 1877.8 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 1877.690 {I19} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$E1 is preferred to M1 by pair-conversion data (1968Be56) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Mo23) 
RI$weighted average of 13.3 {I4} (1971Re04), 13.4 {I3} (1968Ca20), 14.0 {I3} (2001Me01), 13.99 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2507.80 {I8} (1971Re04), 2507.7 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 2507.714 {I18} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.060 {I8} (1971Re04), 0.059 {I5} (1968Ca20), 0.0592 9 (2001Me01), 0.061 {I6} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 496.2 {I4} (1971Re04), 495.7 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 496.075 {I34} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.15 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.149 {I4} (1968Ca20), 0.1223 18 (2001Me01), 0.159 {I3} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 924.1 {I2} (1971Re04), 924.5 {I3} (1968Ca20) and 924.795 {I17} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.035 {I10} (1968Ca20), 0.0474 {I11} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 975.5 {I5} (1968Ca20) and 975.539 {I23} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.022 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0183 {I12} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 1037.2 {I6} (1968Ca20) and 1037.35 {I6} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.10 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.045 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.27 {I4} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 1711.3 {I2} (1971Re04), 1711.0 {I2} (1968Ca20) and 1711.17 {I13} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.021 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0152 {I6} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2605.4 {I4} (1968Ca20) and 2605.44 {I5} (2001Me01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.090 {I9} (1971Re04), 0.089 {I7} (1968Ca20), 0.0868 20 (2001Me01), 0.079 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1390.5 {I4} (1971Re04), 1390.4 {I2} (1968Ca20), 1390.304 {I21} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.117 {I3} (1968Ca20), 0.0981 {I25} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 1991.3 {I3} (1968Ca20), 1991.157 {I33} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from pair-conversion measurements (1968Be56) 
E$weighted average of 2621.0 {I4} (1971Re04), 2621.1 {I3} (1968Ca20), 2621.281 {I23} (2001Me01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.15 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.137 {I4} (1968Ca20), 0.150 {I4} (2001Me01), 0.167 {I6} (2004Mi10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.018 {I4} (1971Re04), 0.020 {I1} (1968Ca20), 0.0209 13 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 1501 {I1} (1971Re04), 1500.9 {I6} (1968Ca20), 1500.47 7 (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.24 {I1} (1971Re04), 0.212 {I6} (1968Ca20), 0.231 {I4} (2001Me01), 0.353 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1837.8 {I2} (1971Re04), 1837.1 {I3} (1968Ca20), 1837.148 {I19} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.032 {I6} (1971Re04), 0.031 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0315 10 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2785.2 {I6} (1971Re04), 2785.1 {I5} (1968Ca20), 2785.833 {I37} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.057 {I4} (1968Ca20), 0.0489 {I12} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 738.5 {I4} (1968Ca20), 738.271 {I23} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.068 {I9} (1971Re04), 0.082 {I6} (1968Ca20), 0.1062 16 (2001Me01), 0.066 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 1163.2 {I4} (1971Re04), 1163.1 {I2} (1968Ca20), 1163.324 {I20} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.040 {I8} (1971Re04), 0.042 {I8} (1968Ca20), 0.0388 29 (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2785.2 {I6} (1971Re04), 2785.1 {I5} (1968Ca20), 2785.833 {I37} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.194 {I11} (1968Ca20), 0.241 4 (2001Me01), 0.220 {I5} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2214.5 {I8} (1971Re04), 2214.3 {I3} (1968Ca20), 2214.022 {I20} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from pair-conversion measurements (1968Be56) 
RI$weighted average of 0.50 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.429 {I12} (1968Ca20), 0.467 13 (2001Me01), 0.470 {I4} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2844.1 {I2} (1971Re04), 2843.9 {I2} (1968Ca20), 2844.171 {I35} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.023 {I2} (1968Ca20), 0.0218 {I5} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 317.5 {I4} (1968Ca20), 317.872 {I26} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.10 {I2} (1971Re04), 0.130 {I4} (1968Ca20), 0.1187 20 (2001Me01), 0.125 {I7} (2004Mi10) 
E$weighted average of 2030.4 {I8} (1971Re04), 2029.1 {I4} (1968Ca20), 2028.93 {I5} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.072 {I13} (1971Re04), 0.055 {I5} (1968Ca20), 0.0643 {I21} (2001Me01) 
E$weighted average of 2981.4 {I4} (1971Re04), 2981.0 {I3} (1968Ca20), 2981.50 {I5} (2001Me01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$observed in Ge(Li) as a peak produced by deexcitation electrons and accompanying x-rays (1969Li12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E only ce from this transition has been observed. 
K/L=8.4 {I6} 
E0 reduced matrix element |r=0.095 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
POL=-0.79 {I15} 
E$ |g ray shown twice in table, second value as 784.6 keV; 784 keV in authors' level-scheme figure. According to e-mail reply of July 30, 2012 from D.G. Roux, 784.3 keV is the correct value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
POL=+0.4 {I4} 
E$ |g ray shown twice in table, second time as 1190.5 keV; 1190 keV in authors' level-scheme figure. According to e-mail reply of July 30, 2012 from D.G. Roux, 1190.0 keV is the correct value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+73}As |e decay. Others: 13.26 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal. 
M$from measured conversion coefficients in {+73}As |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 53.437 {I9} from {+73}As |e decay, 53.45 {I5} from {+73}Ga |b{+-} decay, 53.53 {I6} from {+73}Ge it decay, and 53.47 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M$from measured conversion coefficients in {+73}As |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from Coulomb excitation. Others: 68.7 {I2} from {+73}Ga |b{+-} decay, 68.9 {I1} from (|a,n|g), 68.84 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M$from Coulomb excitation and |a(exp) in (n,|g) E=thermal 
MR$from measured B(E2)|^=0.073 {I7} in Coulomb excitation, adopted T{-1/2} and theoretical |a(M1) and |a(E2) by BrIcc code. Other: |d=0.52 {I13} from |a(exp)=0.81 {I22} in (n,|g) E=thermal and theoretical |a(M1) and |a(E2) values, but with the adopted T{-1/2}, it would give an unreasonably large B(E2)(W.u.)=1330, greatly exceeding RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 284.9 {I2} from {+73}Ga |b{+-} decay and 284.7 {I2} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI,M$from ({+7}Li,3np|g), Mult. from |g(DCO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,3np|g) and (n,n'|g); no uncertainty is given 
RI$unweighted average of 10.0 {I5} from ({+7}Li,3np|g) and 14.4 {I3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 430.2 {I2} from (n,|g) E=thermal and 430.4 {I2} from coulomb excitation 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 100 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(|q) and RUL with |d=+0.59 {I+4-6} or -5.0 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 485.3 {I15} with I|g=4.3 {I5} in (n,|g) E=thermal 
M,MR$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(|q) and RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Coulomb excitation. Other: I|g=0.5 in (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$from Coulomb excitation based on |g(|q) and RUL with |d=+1.2 {I+5-7} or +0.71 {I+94-24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E${+73}Ga |b{+-} decay. Other: 488.0 {I2} in (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Others: <80 in (n,|g) E=thermal, 118 {I8} in {+73}Ga |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 541.7 {I2} from {+73}Ga |b{+-} decay and 541.8 {I2} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Others: 100 {I5} in (n,|g) E=thermal, 100 {I11} in (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from ({+7}Li,3np|g) and (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 29 {I2} from ({+7}Li,3np|g) and 26 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
M$from |g(DCO) in ({+7}Li,3np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 825.8 {I1} from (|a,n|g) and 825.6 {I2} from Coulomb excitation 
M$from Q+O with |d=+0.031 {I+10-14} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), Q from |g(DCO) in ({+7}Li,3np|g), and also from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). Other: 799.4 {I5} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. Others: 62 {I4} from ({+7}Li,3np|g), 38 {I2} from (n,n'|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) and |g(DCO) in ({+7}Li,3np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). Other: 868.0 {I10} from Coulomb excitation 
RI$from Coulomb excitation. Others: 100 {I5} from ({+7}Li,3np|g), 100 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), D from |g(DCO) in ({+7}Li,3np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 561.8 {I4} from {+73}Ga |b{+-} decay and 560.3 {I10} from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 562.5 in (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Coulomb excitation. Other: 925.3 in (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 12 {I2} in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 739.4 {I6} in (n,|g) E=thermal, 739.4 in (n,n'|g) 
RI$other: 100 {I14} in (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 769.9 {I6} in (n,|g) E=thermal, 768 in (n,n'|g) 
RI$others: 14 {I2} in (n,|g) E=thermal, I|g(768)/I|g(739)=2.2 {I11} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: E|g=784.5, I|g=40 {I20} in (n,n'|g). A 784.3|g is placed from 1610 level in ({+7}Li,3np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 783.5 in ({+7}Li,3np|g) 
RI,M$from ({+7}Li,3np|g); Mult. from |g(DCO). Other: I|g=100 {I14} in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). Others: 741.6 from (n,n'|g) and ({+7}Li,3np|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g) 
M,MR$+0.23 {I10} or +5.6 {I13} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) giving |DJ=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from ({+7}Li,3np|g). A |g at similar energy is placed from 1440 level in (n,|g) E=thermal and (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g). 
M$from |g(DCO) in ({+7}Li,3np|g), Q(+O) with |d=+0.05 {I5} from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$others: 53.39 {I20} (1969Cl11), 54 {I1} (1970Wa21) 
RI$deduced by the evaluators from |SI(|g+ce to 66.7 level)+I(|b feeding to 66.7 level) relative to I(297|g)=100 and theoretical |a=8.4. A value of 9.6 {I12} is from weighted average of 9.1 {I8} in 1970Wa21, 9 {I1} in 1958Yt22 and 15 {I2} in 1959Ma04. Note that 1976Fo07 give a discrepant value of 22 {I5}, which implies a 44% |b{+-} feeding to the 67 level inconsistent with |b measurements (1970Wa21, 1958Yt22, 1959Ma04). The average value from |b measurements, on the other hand, gives a negative intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 2000KoZU. Others: 13.263 {I15} (1969Do14), 13.29 {I4} (1971Ra10), 13.34 {I4} (1971Ri01), 13.5 (1970Ky01) 
M$from measured conversion coefficients below: 
$ |a{-T}: 1095 {I55} (1971Ra10), 1310 {I60} (1971Ri01), >1300 (1953We45) 
$1971Ri01 and 1971Ra10 obtain |a{-T} using known values of |a{-K} for 53.4|g and K/(L+M) for 13.3|g in 1971Ve04 and K/(L+M) for 53.4|g in 1952Jo21 
$|a{-K}: 312 {I30} (1971Ra10), 325 {I37} (1970Do01), 376 {I90} (1969Do14) 
$K/L: 0.47 {I1} (1970Ky01), 0.63 {I22} (1953We45), K/L<0.5 (1952Jo21) 
$K/(L+M): 0.36 {I3} (1971Ve04), 0.57 {I23} (1969Do14) 
$L/(L+M): 5.4 {I5} (1952Jo21), 6.6 {I16} (1958Gr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$from 1969Do14. 
M$from measured conversion coefficients below: 
$|a{-T}: 9.1 {I6} (1970Ky01), 8.1 {I22} (1958Gr06), 4.7 {I6} (1953We45), 8 {I+4-2} (1953Ba75) 
$|a{-K}: 7.2 {I6} (1969Do14), 7.8 {I5} (1970Ky01), 7.1 {I6} (1971Ve04) 
$1970Ky01 obtain |a{-K}=7.8 {I5} from |a{-T}=9.1 {I6} using K/(L+M+N)= 6.2 {I2} from 1958Gr06 
$K/(L+M+N): 6.2 {I2} (1958Gr06), 5.6 {I3} (1952Jo21) 
$K/(L+M): 7.1 {I14} (1970Ky01) 
MR$+0.35 {I11} from |g|g(|q) (1974KaYX) is in disagreement with the very small value obtained from ce data (|d<0.1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$placement is from Adopted Gammas; strong transition in spectrum shown by 1974Fo12 but not assigned or placed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 68.746 {I18} measured by 1971Jo15 via (n,|g) has been used in the averaging with other values measured by 1971Jo15 in Coulomb excitation; 68.9 {I15} (1972Gr34) 
RI$other: 7.95 (1972Gr34) 
M$from |a(exp)=0.81 {I22} (1972We10) and RUL, with |d=0.52 {I13} deduced from |a(exp) using the BrIccMixing code. Note that with the adopted T{-1/2}=1.78 ns {I11}, the deduced |d would give an unreasonably large B(E2)(W.u.)=1330, greatly exceeding RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1972We10, not placed in 1972We10 
E$placement from 1972Ha74; value from 1972We10 but not placed. Others: 284.9 {I15} (1972Gr34), 283.7 {I15} (1972Ha74). It is placed from 650.2 level by 1972Gr34 
RI$others: 2.02 (1972Gr34), 1.54 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 297.3 {I15} (1972Gr34), 296.6 {I15} (1972Ha74) 
RI$other: 6.03 (1972Gr34), 6.14 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 325.6 {I15} (1972Gr34), 325.1 {I15} (1972Ha74) 
RI$other: 9.16 (1972Gr34), this value has been used by evaluators to re-normalize relative intensities in 1972Ha74 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement from 1972Gr34 and 1972Ha74; value is from 1972We10 but not assigned to any nuclei. Others: E=431.4 {I15} (1972Gr34), 430.9 {I10} (1972Ha74). 
E$The transition observed in 1972Gr34 and 1972Ha74 could correspond to the two |g rays of 430.2+432.7 that are observed but not assigned to any nuclei in 1972We10 and could de-excite two different levels around 500, as adopted in Adopted Levels. 
RI$deduced by the evaluators from the ratio of relative intensities I(430.2|g)/I(297.24|g)=1.19 {I8}/3.70 {I11} and the absolute I(297.24|g)=7.44 {I25} given in 1972We10. Others: 4.30 (1972Gr34), 3.90 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$2.9 is probably overestimated in 1972Gr34 considering it is not observed in 1972We10 and 1972Ha74. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentatively placed by the evaluators on the basis of energy sums. E|g value is from 1972We10 only but not assigned to any nuclei and this |g is seen in coincidence with 430.2|g which could also be placed from the 932 level other than from the 499 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$tentatively placed by the evaluators on the basis of energy sums. E|g value is from 1972We10 only and it is also placed by 1972We10 from 555 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$others: 541.8 {I15} (1972Gr34); 541.5 {I10} placed from 1042 by 1972Ha74 
E$others: 1.80 (1972Gr34), 1.18 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$placement suggested by 1972Ha74, but possibly contaminated with 531|g from {+74}Ge; see 1972Ha74 and 1972We10 (531.2 {I2} is observed and assigned to {+74}Ge by 1972We10). 1972Ha74 also suggest a placement from 1131 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$possibly contaminated with 562|g from {+71}Ge; see 1972Gr34 and 1972We10. Others: 560.3 {I15} (1972Gr34), 561.5 {I10} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 1.49 (1972Gr34), 1.03 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement suggested by 1972Ha74; value from 1972We10. 
RI$see comment for 430.2|g placed from 499 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 650.2 {I15} (1972Gr34, placed from a 650.2 level), 649.7 {I10} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 1.90 (1972Gr34), 1.01 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 740.0 {I15} (1972Gr34), 739.4 {I10} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 3.60 (1972Gr34), 2.61 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 763.5 {I10} (1972Ha74), 765.4 {I15} (1972Gr34, placed from 1265 level) 
RI$others: 0.93 (1972Ha74); 3.81 from 1972Gr34 differs significantly 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 975.6 {I10} (1972Ha74, placed from 1042 level), 978.4 {I15} (1972Gr34, unplaced) 
RI$others: 2.00 (1972Gr34), 0.7 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5518.1 {I11} (1972Gr34), 5521.1 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 4.86 (1972Gr34), 3.23 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5650.8 {I11} (1972Gr34), 5650.7 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 2.14 (1972Gr34), 1.34 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5740.8 {I11} (1972Gr34), 5738.9 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 2.35 (1972Gr34),1.59 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5850.9 {I11} (1972Gr34), 5851.2 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 1.15 (1972Gr34), 0.70 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 5867.2 {I15} (1972Gr34), 5868.3 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 0.44 (1972Gr34), 0.18 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6227.7 {I15} (1972Gr34), 6228.1 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 0.73 (1972Gr34), 0.50 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6390.6 {I11} (1972Gr34), 6389.0 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 5.23 (1972Gr34), 2.39 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6419.0 {I11} (1972Gr34), 6417.4 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 2.93 (1972Gr34), 1.64 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 6716.9 {I20} (1972Gr34), 6713.6 {I20} (1972Ha74) 
RI$others: 0.58 (1972Gr34), 0.73 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas, based on results from other |g spectroscopy studies. E|g=286.8 quoted by 1990Ko49 seems to be in error since no 286.8 gamma was reported in other studies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1971Jo15, weighted average of results from measurements using (|a,|a'|g), (p,p'|g) and (n,|g) reactions. Other: 68.6 {I2} from 1972Sa27 
MR$from adopted T{-1/2}=1.78 ns {I11} and measured B(E2)|^=0.073 {I7} (1972Sa27) if J(68.7)=7/2, together with theoretical |a(M1) and |a(E2) values from BrIcc code. Other: +0.92 {I+300-77} from |g(|q) in 1972Sa27 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
RI$other: 4.1 {I12} from ratio of measured |eB(E2)|^ (1972Sa27) 
MR$+1.2 {I+5-7} or +0.71 {I+94-24} (1972Sa27) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
From ce data (1983Pa10) 
TI <0.006 from {+74}As |e decay 
$ q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)<0.12, X(E0/E2)<0.052, |r{+2}(E0)>0.032 (2005Ki02, evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) (1970Ch15). Other: 2.0 {I+3-6} or 0.75 {I+15-6} (1987Do14). 
M D+Q from |g(|q). |DJ|p=no from placement in level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) (1970Ch15). Other: 0.47 {I5} (1987Do14). 
M D+Q from |g(|q). |DJ|p=no from placement in level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
MR |g|g(|q) in {+74}As |e. Mult from |DJ|p 
M D+Q from |g(|q). |DJ|p=no from placement in level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
(608|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=0.27 {I4} (1975Ca37). Others: 1969Ha28, 1969Sc11, 1960Ya02 
(608|g)(596|g)(|q,H,t): 1972BeWU 
MR from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
From ce and |g spectra, Ice(K)/I|g(887|g)<5|*10{+-5} (1983Pa10). This limit implies B(E0)/B(E2)<0.055 and monopole strength <0.35 (1983Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2+M1]
decay_comment:
(993|g)(1204|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=0.33 {I5} (1975Ca37); (993|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=0.08 {I4} (1975Ca37) 
MR from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ from A{-2}=+0.18 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I5} using WHF method (1987Do14). |d=+2.2 {I3} or 0.0 {I1} (WHF method) and |d=+3 {I1} or +0.1 {I2} using population-parameter method (PPM) (1970Ch15), A{-2}=+0.13 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I1} at E(n)=1.75 MeV. A{-2}=+0.24 {I1} at E(n)=2.13 MeV (1970Ch15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from A{-2}=+0.66 {I3} at E(n)=2.13 MeV (WHF) method (1970Ch15), |d sign given by (1970Ch15) is inconsistent with the phase convention used. |d=2.0 {I+3-6} or 0.75 {I+15-6} from A{-2}=+0.50 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (WHF method, 1987Do14). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ from A{-2}=+0.20 {I1} at E(n)=2.13 MeV (WHF) method (1970Ch15). |d=0.47 {I5} from A{-2}=+0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (WHF) method (1987Do14), 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0604 {I4} (2000To12), 0.0609 {I6} (1980Le24) 
$E2 matrix element=+0.551 {I20} (2000To12) 
$ |b{-20}=0.285 (1980Le24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.051 {I8} (2000To12), 0.10 {I2} (1980Le24) 
$E2 matrix element=+0.50 {I4} (2000To12) 
$M1 matrix element=0.0014 {I7} (2000To12) 
$ |b{-22}=0.260 (1980Le24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0007 {I3} (2000To12), 0.0013 {I5} (1980Le24) 
$E2 matrix element=+0.058 {I10} (2000To12) 
$ |b{-20}=0.042 (1980Le24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+0.850 {I25} (2000To12) 
$B(E2)=0.080 {I5} (2000To12), 0.067 {I6} (1980Le24) 
$ |b{-42}=0.211 (1980Le24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E2 matrix element=+0.14 {I4} (2000To12) 
$B(E2)=0.018 {I13} (2000To12), <0.040 (1980Le24) 
$ |b{-02}<0.16 (1980Le24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.08 {I21}, |D{-asym2}=0.03 {I13}, |D{-asym3}=-0.06 {I22} 
MR$-3.5 {I+17-62} or 0.01 {I+18-23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=-0.05 {I9}, |D{-asym2}=-0.01 {I7}, |D{-asym3}=0.04 {I7} 
MR$-0.22 {I+5-7} or -0.14 {I+10-12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.39 {I31}, |D{-asym2}=0.28 {I20}, |D{-asym3}=-0.12 {I32} 
MR$|<-4 or 0.27 {I+28-26} or |>5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=-0.03 {I6}, |D{-asym2}=-0.04 {I5}, |D{-asym3}=-0.01 {I5} 
MR$-2.9 {I+4-5} or -0.04 {I+4-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=-0.02 {I9}, |D{-asym2}=-0.11 {I7}, |D{-asym3}=-0.08 {I8} 
MR$-3.6 {I+8-10} or 0.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.21 {I29}, |D{-asym2}=-0.12 {I16}, |D{-asym3}=-0.33 {I19} 
MR$|<-2 or 0.12 {I+24-29} or |>18 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.03 {I6}, |D{-asym2}=-0.04 {I5}, |D{-asym3}=-0.07 {I5} 
MR$-2.8 {I+4-5} or -0.05 {I+4-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=-0.00 {I8}, |D{-asym2}=-0.32 {I6}, |D{-asym3}=-0.32 {I7} 
MR$-9.9 {I+32-77} or 0.19 {I+5-4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=-0.23 {I27}, |D{-asym2}=-0.20 {I21}, |D{-asym3}=0.03 {I18} 
MR$-4.8 {I+23-84} or 0.08 {I+13-17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.07 {I11}, |D{-asym2}=-0.09 {I9}, |D{-asym3}=-0.16 {I11} 
MR$-3.0 {I+7-10} or -0.03 {I+8-9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.04 {I3}, |D{-asym2}=-0.07 {I3}, |D{-asym3}=-0.11 {I3} 
MR$-3.0 {I23} or -0.031 {I+22-25} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$|D{-asym1}=0.07 {I11}, |D{-asym2}=0.25 {I14}, |D{-asym3}=0.19 {I18} 
MR$-1.7 {I6} or -0.26 {I+13-24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=1.40 {I7} (from comparison of I|g with K x-rays (1976Bh04)). Other: |a(K)exp=1.44 {I13} (1962We08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=4.2 {I10} (1982Is07). Conversion coefficient is deduced from |g data and is expressed as (I(total)-I|g)/I|g. The two cascades used for calculation are from the levels 317 to 192 to 140 and 674 to 192 to 140. RUL|<1 excludes E1+M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor energy fit. Authors quote E(level)=2215.0, consistent with the placement from this level of the 2075|g. The 1455|g leads to E(level)=2217.8 {I7}, suggesting either an incorrect placement, or a mistake in the quoted E|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of +2.5 {I2} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) and +2.1 {I4} from |g|g(|q) in ({+76}Ge,{+76}Ge'). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+238}U({+76}Ge,{+76}Ge'|g) (2013To05). Value of 75 from (n,n'|g) is in agreement, but 200 {I15} in |b{+-} decay (1971Ca39) is in severe disagreement. Value from 2013To05 is preferred here as the branching ratio in this work is supported by |g|g-coin data, whereas no coincidence data were obtained in 1971Ca39. Moreover, there are many contaminants present in |g-ray spectrum from {+76}Ga decay obtained by 1971Ca39 
MR$weighted average of +1.8 {I4} from ({+76}Ge,{+76}Ge'|g) and +1.87 {I+17-11} from (n,n'|g). The smaller values in those datasets are less likely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.48 {I+9-7} or +2.9 {I1} from (n,n'|g) (2017Mu03) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0096 {I+34-22} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=55 {I+20-13} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+76}Ge,{+76}Ge'|g). Other: 913.2 {I5} in (n,n'|g). E|g=911.40 {I11} from |b{+-} decay is inconsistent 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.65 {I+93-18} or +1.4 {I10} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g). 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.020 {I+8-7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=123 {I+46-42} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+2.8 {I+11-8} or +0.57 {I+18-12} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0033 {I+40-15} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5 {I+6-2} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+1.9 {I2} or +0.08 {I4} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.007 {I+8-3} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5 {I+6-2} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.01 {I10} or +1.1 {I2} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0059 {I+28-24} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=19 {I+9-8} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.002 {I63} or +1.09 {I2} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0019 {I+9-8} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.6 {I+8-6} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Tentative B(E3)(W.u.)=700 {I350}. 
RI$this value is questionable since reduced transition probability is 9.4 W.u. in (p,p'); and 11.7 W.u. in (|a,|a'), which suggest I|g|?0.1. This |g ray was reported in {+76}Ga |b{+-} decay only, where it may have been contributed mainly by a sum line 
$B(E3)(W.u.)=1.22|*10{+3} {I32} exceeds RUL=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+4.3 {I9} or +0.36 {I+6-5} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.015 {I+6-5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=14 {I+6-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+2.9 {I+23-11} or -0.07 {I+15-6} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=7.0|*10{+-4} {I+11-9} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.198 {I+32-26} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$+3.0 {I+9-5} or -0.08 {I6} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0230 {I+37-35} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=6.0 {I+10-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.05 {I+6-5} or +1.64 {I2} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.182 {I+31-23} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=107 {I+18-14} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.13 {I8} or +1.5 {I3} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0063 {I+25-23} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.1 {I+12-11} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.31 {I+5-6} or +10 {I+11-3} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0092 {I+10-9} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.03 {I+34-29} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.7 {I+150-10} or +3 {I+13-3} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00396 {I+44-51} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.80 {I+9-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.09 {I9} or +1.4 {I3} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.280 {I+47-35} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=123 {I+21-15} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-3 {I+13-3} or -1 {I+20-1} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0044 {I+6-5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.36 {I+19-16} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.36 {I+21-10} or +1.03 {I+25-81} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0064 {I+8-7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.25 {I+16-13} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.05 {I+9-1} or -7 {I+14-3} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0016 {I+13-8} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.48 {I+38-24} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-8 {I+13-3} or +0.08 {I8} in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=9|*10{+-4} {I+8-5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.18 {I+15-9} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.48 {I+13-20} or +1.9 {I+10-17} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.064 {I7} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=25.8 {I28} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-4 {I+60-2} or +0.04 {I2} (2017Mu03) in (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0239 {I+18-20} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.47 {I+33-37} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1395.1 {I5} (1977SiZT) and 1395.66 {I4} (2017Mu03) 
$|d(E2/M1)=+1.9 {I2} or +0.08 {I4} (2017Mu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1639.8 {I5} (1977SiZT) and 1639.30 {I5} (2017Mu03). Other: 1639.4 (1984KoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|d(E2/M1)=+3.1 {I3} is also possible from |g(|q) data, but the corresponding B(E2)(W.u.)=35 {I+9-7} is unrealistic. B(M1)=0.02 {I1} for |d=+3.1 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 1732.9 {I5} (1977SiZT), 1732.9 (1984KoZN). 
$|d(E2/M1)=+2.3 {I3} is also possible from |g(|q) data, but the corresponding B(E2)(W.u.)=40 {I+10-9} is unrealistic (2017Mu03) B(M1)=0.03 {I1} for |d=+2.3 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2278.5 {I5} (1977SiZT) and 2278.84 {I14} (2017Mu03). Other: 2278.2 (1984KoZN). 
$|d(E2/M1)=+3.0 {I+9-5} or -0.08 {I6} (2017Mu03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2919.0 {I5} (1977SiZT) and 2919.53 {I17} (2017Mu03). Other: 2919.6 (1984KoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2023.3 {I5} (1977SiZT) and 2021.48 {I10} (2017Mu03) 
$|d(E2/M1)=-0.31 {I+5-6} or +10 {I+11-3} (2017Mu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2578.7 {I3} (1977SiZT) and 2578.40 {I8} (2017Mu03) 
E$this |g is not resolved from a 2580.07-keV |g ray from a 3175.5, 3- level in {+74}Ge (2017Mu03). 
$|d(E2/M1)=+0.7 {I+150-10} or +3 {I+13-3} (2017Mu03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(3389)/I|g(3952)=63 {I8}/100 (2015Cr06) 
RI$unweighted average of 62 {I12} at E(n)=4.3 MeV, 47 {I8} at E(n)=4.5 MeV, 80 {I14} at E(n)=4.7 MeV, and 65 {I18} at E(n)=4.9 MeV (2015Cr06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI$from 1980Le24. I|g=71 {I4} in Adopted Gammas 
BE2$others: 0.0017 {I3} (1980Le24) and 0.00095 {I+30-25} (2001To13) 
$E2 matrix element=+0.069 {I10} (2001To13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$E2 matrix element=-0.11 {I1} (2001To13) 
RI$0.011 {I3} deduced by evaluators from B(E2) ratios in 2001To13 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$<19 deduced by evaluators from B(E2) ratios in 2001To13 
$E2 matrix element=+0.06 {I2} (2001To13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$<0.65 deduced by evaluators from B(E2) ratios in 2001To13 
$E2 matrix element=-0.10 {I3} (2001To13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$33 {I+19-13} deduced by evaluators from B(E2) ratios in 2001To13 
$E2 matrix element=+0.10 {I2} (2001To13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$2039.40 (2016To01) 
$Measured branching ratio from 2016To01: I|g(2040):I|g(2843):I|g(3389)=7.1 {I12}:35.6 {I60}:57.3 {I98} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Evaluator's note: energy seems too high by 1.6 keV as compared to some precise values in literature of 562.93 keV 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.05 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$Evaluator's note: energy seems too high by 0.8 keV as compared to some precise values in literature of 1108.4 keV 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.11 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2919.7 {I2} (1995Ju01) and 2919.3 {I2} (2022Sc03) 
RI$from 1995Ju01 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.33 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3141.2 {I2} (1995Ju01) and 3140.9 {I2} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.05 {I15}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 3419.2 {I1} (1995Ju01) and 3418.9 {I1} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.86 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3680.6 {I1} (1995Ju01) and 3680.4 {I1} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.84 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4917.5 {I6} (1995Ju01) and 4916.5 {I6} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.75 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5540.5 {I5} (1995Ju01) and 5540.1 {I2} (2022Sc03) 
RI$from 1995Ju01 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.76 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5578.8 {I5} (1995Ju01) and 5581.0 {I2} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.66 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 5956.3 {I5} (1995Ju01) and 5954.8 {I2} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.71 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 7026.4 {I5} (1995Ju01) and 7025.8 {I3} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.73 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 7918.2 {I23} (1995Ju01) and 7913.4 {I2} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.80 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 8152.8 {I10} (1995Ju01) and 8151.6 {I5} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=0.85 {I12}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 8747.9 {I31} (1995Ju01) and 8752.8 {I4} (2022Sc03) 
$I|g(90|')/I|g(127|')=1.05 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0537 {I31} for unshifted peak, 0.0607 {I20} for shifted peak, and 0.0588 {I18} for conventional method (2017Do13). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$ from (431.0|g)(1108.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1}. Or less likely +0.37 {I8} from A{-2}=+0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.010 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$ from (976.5|g)(562.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1}. Or less likely +0.23 {I4} from A{-2}=+0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$consistent with previous observation of a 913.2 {I5} gamma in (n,n'|g), but not with 911.40 {I10} reported in {+76}Ga decay study 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E$from weighted average of values from (n,|g) E=thermal, {+76}Ge IT decay and {+76}Ge({+13}C,{+12}C|g). 
M$ce data in {+77}Ge IT decay give E3 or M3; however, |DJ|p consistent with E3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
M$from the Adopted Gammas 
$ Others: E|g=159.5 (1972Gr34), 159.61 {I17} (2007ChZX). I|g(absolute)=0.32 (1972Ha74) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ 279.8 (1991ZoZX) 
$Evaluators' note: according to e-mail reply of June 29, 2009 from the first author, the angular distribution result for the 279.9|g should be disregarded since half the data points were missing and the intensity of the transition is weak. Coefficients are listed in 2009KaZZ for the sake of completeness. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ Evaluators' note: sign and magnitude of A{-4} are in disagreement with theoretical value for 3/2 to 1/2, D+Q transition. However, the initial and final spins for this transition are known from other sources 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ Evaluators' note: magnitude of A{-4} is in disagreement with expected isotropic pattern for 1/2 initial level spin. However, the initial and final spins for this transition are known from other sources 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Evaluator's note: sign and magnitude of A{-4} are in disagreement with theoretical value for 5/2 to 3/2, D+Q transition, but the magnitude agrees within 2|s 
E$766.2 (1991ZoZX) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E3)
decay_comment:
E$from 1970Me20 
RI$from 1969Im02. 
M$|a(K)exp=1.2 {I6} (1962We08), |a(K)=0.71 for E3, 0.93 for M3. E3 assignment is consistent with J|p values of g.s. and 160 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_comment:
RI$0.6 {I1} deduced by evaluator from summed I(|g+ce) feeding at 186 level, total conversion coefficient for 186-keV transition and 4% IT decay branch. This intensity is not given in the data field since the 186-keV transition de-excites an isomeric state in {+79}Ge whose half-life is |?13 times longer than that of {+79}Ga parent, which makes the intensity as time-dependent, based on counting schedule 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 1987Wi13 
I|g(204|g)/I|g(659|g from {+80}Ga |b{+-})=0.00089 {I8} (1987Wi13) leads to %|b{+-}n (to 391 level)=0.08 {I1} (1987Wi13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,M$from observed electron line at 628 keV {I1}, interpreted as K-conversion line of a 639-keV transition; no |g ray seen at 639 keV indicating an E0 transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$single line is proposed in 2021Se17, with no evidence for a doublet as proposed in 1981Ho24 and kept in a later study by 2013Ve03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 711.05 {I14} (1980HoZN), 711.1 {I5} (2016Al10), and 711.4 {I4} (2016Te09). 
RI$weighted average of 16.0 {I17} (1980HoZN), 12.4 {I14} (2016Al10), and 17 {I1} (2016Te09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 216.46 {I7} (1980HoZN), 216.4 {I4} (2016Al10), and 216.9 {I3} (2016Te09). 
RI$weighted average of 6.5 {I6} (1980HoZN), 8.2 {I9} (2016Al10), and 5.6 {I7} (with respect to I|g(711)=17 {I1}, otherwise 33 I{4} if I|g(711)=100 {I48} - 2016Te09 - other: 6.8 {I34} from 40 {I20}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 530.2 {I3} (1980HoZN), 530.0 {I5} (2016Al10), and 530.5 {I4} (2016Te09). 
RI$unweighted average of 2.3 {I8} (1980HoZN), 0.6 {I1} (2016Al10), and 4.1 {I7} (with respect to I|g(711)=17 {I1}, otherwise 34 I{4} if I|g(711)=100 {I48} - 2016Te09 - other: 4.6 {I24} from 27 {I14}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 562.4 {I5} (2016Al10) and 562.8 {I4} (2016Te09). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.6 {I2} (2016Al10) and 1.0 {I3} (with respect to I|g(711)=17 {I1}, otherwise 6 {I2} if I|g(711)=100 {I48} - 2016Te09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1287.7 {I8} (2016Al10) and 1286.4 {I5} (2016Te09). 
RI$weighted average of 1.8 {I4} (2016Al10) and 2.5 {I10} (with respect to I|g(711)=17 {I1}, otherwise 15 {I6} if I|g(711)=100 {I48} - (2016Te09)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 828.1 {I5} (2016Al10) and 828.3 {I4} (2016Te09). 
RI$Weighted average of 2.1 {I3} (2016Al10) and 1.0 {I5} (with respect to I|g(711)=17 {I1}, otherwise 6 {I3} if I|g(711)=100 {I48} - 2016Te09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 936.4 {I5} (2016Al10) and 936.6 {I4} (2016Te09). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.7 {I2} (2016Al10) and 0.7 {I3} (with respect to I|g(711)=17 {I1}, otherwise 4 {I2} if I|g(711)=100 {I48} - 2016Te09) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
%I|g=36.7 {I25} assuming recommended decay-scheme normalization. I(216|g)/I(delayed n)=2.9 {I2} (1981Ho07). 
M from |a(K)(exp) in 1981Ho24. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ <60 counts observed, prompt background is high in inelastic scattering with {+9}Be target (2010Ga14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$doublet, the other component is in {+82}As from {+82}Ge |b decay, in coincidence with 843|g in {+82}As from {+82}Ge decay 
RI$intensity of a component of this |g ray belonging to {+82}Ge decay has been subtracted by 2016Al10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$absolute intensity=1.90 {I11}, deduced by compilers from |g-ray intensity data for {+83}Ga |b{+-} and |b{+-}n decays in 2010Wi03 (Phys. Rev. C81, 044303) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2017Ve01 note that energy is in poor agreement with 1245.7 {I1} in 2016Al10 
$Weak line in |b-gated |g spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+83}Ge Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database (Dec 2014 update). Other: 249.2 {I5} in 2017Ve01 as a mixed line, the second component of 249.1 {I5} (2015Et01: Phys. Rev. C 91, 064317) from the decay of {+82}Ge 
RI$intensity extracted from analysis of two-component decay curve 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from 2009LeZZ. A gamma ray at 1045 keV is clearly seen by 2009Gr06, yet it was not placed in the decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 2009LeZZ. A gamma ray at 1045 keV is clearly seen by 2009Gr06, yet it was not placed on the decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$Since no feeding correction was applied, B(E2)>0.018 
$Since no feeding correction was applied, B(E2)(W.u.)>8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$773|g was incorrectly assigned to the decay of {+84}As in Fig. 1b of 2013Ko31 (Phys. Rev. C 88, 04430). 2018Mi03 did not observe this |g in coincidence with neutrons or any other |g rays, thus it is placed as a ground-state transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Placement as a ground-state transition in {+85}Ge based on its non-observation in coincidence with neutrons or |g rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from Fig. 10 in 2023Yo04; 13.3 {I12} in authors' Table IV. 
$E|g=249.94 {I14}(stat) {I38}(syst) (2023Yo04) 
$I|g=7.6 {I7}(stat) {I7}(syst) (2023Yo04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$the uncertainty in energy results from the quadratic sum of uncertainties on the energy calibration and the peak-maximum determination 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$unobserved due to the absorption of the Microball detector. 
RI$extracted from intensity balance in spectrum gated by the 556|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$ R{-ADO}=1.9 {I5} consistent with E1+M2 according to text in 2012De05, but their proposed J|p=(4+) in the text would suggest M1+E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ quoted as 839 keV in level scheme Fig. 2 which is a misprint according to e-mail reply of Apr 24, 2012 from G. de Angelis. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=0.10 {I3} from intensity imbalance in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g) 
MR$from |a(exp) with sign from |g(|q). Other: -7.87 {I28} from |g(|q) in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g). 
M$Other: |DJ=0 highly mixed M1+E2 from R(DCO) in {+12}C({+58}Ni,pn|g) is consistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 1.2 {I5} in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g). 
M$D with |d<0.8 from comparison to RUL; |D|p=no from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g) 
M$Other: |DJ=1, M1 from R(DCO) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,3pn|g) is discrepant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|a(exp)=0.43 {I10} in {+68}Se |e decay. 
M$from |a(exp). 
MR$+0.86 {I15} from |g(|q) in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g), however RUL excludes such a large mixture of M3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 11.0 {I17} in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g). 
M$Other: |DJ=0, M1 from R(DCO) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,3pn|g) is discrepant, however, uncertainty in R(DCO) is large. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 70.9 {I12} in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g). 
M,MR$Others: M1+E2, |d=0.35 {I15} from |g(|q) and |g(lin pol) in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g) is discrepant while |DJ=0, D from R(DCO) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,3pn|g) is consistent. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other: 330 {I20} in {+12}C({+58}Ni,pn|g) 
M$Q from R(DCO) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,3pn|g); M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Q from R(DCO) in {+12}C({+58}Ni,pn|g) and {+40}Ca({+32}S,3pn|g); M2 excluded by comparison to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$Other: Q from R(DCO)=1.46 {I36} in {+12}C({+58}Ni,pn|g), value is also consistent with |DJ=1 M1+E2 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from branching of 1997Ba24 in {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g) this transition should have been seen by 1998So23 in {+12}C({+58}Ni,pn|g). The placement of this transition is thus questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$Other: (D) from R(DCO) in {+40}Ca({+32}S,3pn|g), although Q cannot be excluded based on large uncertainties. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from adopted branching ratios and I|g(202|g)=5.9 {I18}. 
RI$Other: The authors report 6.3 {I10}, however, this leads to a large intensity imbalance (-36%) for the 315 level. The intensity derived from the adopted branching ratios improves, but does not resolve this issue, with a -9% feeding to the 315 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from the Adopted Levels, mult is M1,E2. From the decay scheme, the requirements that I(|e+|b{++})|<100 and |>0 for the 425 and 353 levels, leads to |d(73|g)|<1.0 and |<1.5, respectively. The evaluator adopts mult=M1, which gives |S I(|e+|b{++})|?100% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$R = 0.88 {I11} 
M$|d=-1.3 {I+5-16} from {+54}Fe({+16}O,pn|g) is in agreement with only |DJ=0 M1/E2 from R. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
$R{-DCO}=0.8 {I3} 
M$possible doublet component in DCO ratio, value is tentative and Q character cannot be excluded due to large uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.157 {I14}; A{-4}=-0.045 {I17} 
$|a(exp)=0.10 {I3} (1989Ba37) from intensity imbalance. 
MR$from |a(exp). Other: -7.87 {I28} from |g(|q) (1997Ba24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M3
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.099 {I12}; A{-4}=-0.001 {I10} 
M$|a(exp)=0.43 {I10} in {+68}Se |e decay and comparison to RUL gives E2. Evaluator notes that RUL excludes such a large admixture of M3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}; A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} 
RI$Other: 80 
$|a(exp)=0.24 {I5} (1997Ba24) from intensity imbalance. 
MR$Other: <0.16 from |a(exp) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$19/2- to 15/2- listed in table I of 2004St23 seems a misprint; shown as 23/2- to 19/2- in authors' figure 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$(29/2+) to (25/2+) listed in table I of 2004St23 seems a misprint; shown as (33/2+) to (29/2+) in authors' figure 3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From branching in adopted |g's, I|g (1307|g) from the 1307 level is expected to be |? 42. The excess suggests the 2168 level, which decays via 1306|g, may be populated in this reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$59 {I1} in {+58}Ni({+16}O,p|a|g) at 52.5 MeV 
M$|DJ=2 from A{-2}=+0.35 {I4}, A{-4}=0 {I4} 
RI$From branching in adopted |g's, I|g (1307|g) from the 1307 level is expected to be |? 27. The excess suggests the 2168 level, which decays via 1306|g, may be populated in this reaction. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$25 {I1} in {+58}Ni({+16}O,p|a|g) at 52.5 MeV 
M$|DJ=2 from A{-2}=+0.32 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I8} 
E$Doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$664.5 in level scheme of Fig.4 (2009Ba30) is a misprint 
$A{-2}=-0.325 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.082 {I37} 
$Linear |g polarization=+0.22 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1+M2]
decay_comment:
E$Value of 433.9 given in authors' level scheme is a misprint 
$A{-2}=-0.167 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I4} 
$Linear |g polarization=+0.30 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Doublet: |g 733.5 and |g 732.9.|g(|q) shows a typical Q type transition and |g linear polarization indicates pure E2 character 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from comparison with RUL and |a(L)exp in |b{++} decay in 1974Te04, no direct |b{++}/|e-feeding observed. Other: Estimated from the transition probabilities deduced from measured halflife in 1979Te06. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$E2 from RUL. E2+M3 with |d = 0.04 {I3} in {+58}Ni({+14}N,2p|g), however, this results in an M3 component which exceeds RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$D+Q from R(DCO) in {+55}Mn({+18}O,3n|g), in {+58}Ni({+14}N,2p|g),{+56}Fe({+16}O,np|g) multipolarity is given as E1+M2 with |d=-2.9 {I3}. Evaluators note that this is a very large, non-zero value of |d for a level with no measured lifetime. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+58}Ni({+14}N,2p|g), {+56}Fe({+16}O,np|g). Multipolarity for this transition was given D+Q in 1978Fi09 but this transition was not observed in 1991Ba43 or 2015Ha25 and thus, marked questionable by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$D(+Q) from |g(|q) in {+58}Ni({+14}N,2p|g),{+56}Fe({+16}O,np|g), M1(+E2) from assumed member of rotational band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$E2 from RUL. E2+M3 with |d = -0.06 {I3} in {+58}Ni({+14}N,2p|g), however, this results in an M3 component which exceeds RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$D from R(DCO) in {+55}Mn({+18}O,3n|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 
E$placement from {+55}Mn({+18}O,3n|g). A 743|g is placed from the 1676-keV level in {+51}V({+28}Si,2|an|g),{+46}Ti({+28}Si,3pn|g) and {+58}Ni({+14}N,2p|g),{+56}Fe({+16}O,np|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2} = -0.052 {I49}, A{-4} = -0.036 {I51} and |d=+0.12 {I31} from |g(|q) for 1+ to 2+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2} = -0.186 {I64}, A{-4} = -0.012 {I50} and |d = +0.03 {I3} from |g(|q) for 2+ to 1+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$Mult: from A{-2} = -0.126 {I106}, A{-4} = -0.278 {I115} and |d=+0.28 {I+52-25} from |g(|q) for 1+ to 1+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = 0.142 {I58}, A{-4} = 0.124 {I46} and |d=-0.01 {I27} from |g(|q) for 1+ to 2+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = 0.304 {I90}, A{-4} =0.024 {I75} and |d = +0.15 {I4} from |g(|q) for 2+ to 2+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = -0.165 {I53}, A{-4} = 0.010 {I54} and |d = +0.03 {I3} from |g(|q) for 2- to 1+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = 0.131 {I106}, A{-4} = -0.116 {I115} and |d = -0.21 {I8} from |g(|q) for 3+ to 3+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = -0.285 {I49}, A{-4} = -0.047 {I38} and |d = +0.013 {I14} from |g(|q) for 4- to 3+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = -0.400 {I104}, A{-4} =-0.005 {I103} and |d = -0.17 {I+12-19} from |g(|q) in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$from A{-2} = -0.413 {I104}, A{-4} = -0.003 {I103} and |d=-0.08 {I4} from |g(|q) for 5- to 4- cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = -0.237 {I186}, A{-4} = -0.090 {I188} and |d = +0.03 {I5} from |g(|q) for 3+ to 2+ cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = -0.301 {I99}, A{-4} = -0.061 {I76} and |d = +0.01 {I3} from |g(|q) for 3- to 2- cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$Other: A{-2} = -0.169 {I173}, A{-4} = 0.076 {I172} and |d = +0.07 {I11} from |g(|q) for 3- to 4- cascade in 1995Po03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 1.47 {I31}. Obtained by gating on the 788.2|g E1 transition, assuming |d = 0 (2015Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 0.88 {I14}. Obtained by gating on the 318.9|g E1 transition, assuming |d = 0 (2015Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 0.44 {I1} (2015Ha25) 
RI$2015Ha25 gives branching ratio of I|g(788|g):I|g(221|g)=98.6 {I4}: 1.4 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 1.24 {I29}. Obtained by gating on the 788.2|g E1 transition, assuming |d = 0 (2015Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 1.21 {I34}. Obtained by gating on the 788.2|g E1 transition, assuming |d = 0 (2015Ha25) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 0.80 {I17} (2015Ha25) 
RI$2015Ha25 gives branching ratio of I|g(905|g):I|g(828|g)=62 {I7}: 38 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 0.95 {I14} (2015Ha25) 
RI$2015Ha25 gives branching ratio of I|g(981|g):I|g(153|g)=95.9 {I8}: 4.1 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 0.85 {I16} (2015Ha25) 
RI$2015Ha25 gives branching ratio of I|g(1212|g):I|g(1059|g)=72 {I10}: 28 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 1.27 {I18} (2015Ha25) 
RI$2015Ha25 gives branching ratio of I|g(906|g):I|g(934|g):I|g(1474|g)=52 {I7}: 4 {I2}: 44 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$R{-DCO} = 0.92 {I11} (2015Ha25) 
RI$2015Ha25 gives branching ratio of I|g(612|g):I|g(743|g)=58 {I6}: 42 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 147.50 {I22} from {+71}Se |e decay, 147.7 {I4} from ({+16}O,3p|g), 147.5 {I1} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g), 147.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), 145 {I2} from (p,|g), and 147.3 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 681.29 {I16} from {+71}Se |e decay and 681.2 {I2} from (p,2n|g). Other: 684 {I3} from (p,|g), probably for 681.26 + 685.00 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 722.90 {I13} from {+71}Se |e decay, 722.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 722.9 {I2} from (p,2n|g). Other: 725 {I3} from (p,|g), probably for 722.81 + 726.70 
RI$weighted average of 39.6 {I14} from {+71}Se |e decay and 48 {I6} from (|a,2n|g). Other: 21 {I7} in (p,2n|g) is too low by a factor of |?2; not considered in averaging. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 870.30 {I8} from {+71}Se |e decay, 870.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 870.3 {I2} from (p,2n|g). Other: 870 {I2} from (p,|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I11} from (|a,2n|g), and 100 {I7} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 777.3 {I4} from {+71}Se |e decay, 777.0 {I4} from ({+16}O,3p|g), and 777.4 {I3} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g). Other: 779 {I3} from (p,|g) 
RI$weighted average of 5.8 {I16} from {+71}Se |e decay, 12.2 {I33} from ({+16}O,3p|g), and 27 {I18} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$If M1, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.012 {I10} 
E$weighted average of 924.54 {I8} from {+71}Se |e decay, 924.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g), 924.6 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g), 925.0 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 924.4 {I2} from (p,2n|g). Other: 924 {I2} from (p,|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I19} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 100 {I27} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M,MR$from |g(|q), |g|g(|q) and |g(DCO) in in-beam |g-ray studies. |d from |g(|q) in ({+12}C,pn|g) (1980Gu05); |DJ=1 from |g(DCO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 830.33 {I9} from {+71}Se |e decay, 830.9 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 830.2 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1000.20 {I20} from {+71}Se |e decay, 1000.2 {I1} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g), 1000.8 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 1000.0 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=2, quadrupole from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in in-beam |g-ray studies; M2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GE;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GE
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 981.60 {I20} from {+71}Se |e decay, 981.8 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g), 982.1 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), and 981.6 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$others: 1095.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g), 1098 {I4} from (p,|g), and 1095.0 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 
RI$others: 100 {I18} from (|a,2n|g) and 100 {I14} from (p,2n|g) 
M$(Q), |DJ=(2) from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) is inconsistent with adopted |DJ|p. |g(|q) data in (|a,2n|g) could be also consistent with |DJ=0, which would give J(1243)=(3/2), consistent with adopted (3/2,5/2)- 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D)
decay_comment:
E$this |g ray is believed to be different from 1098.82|g from 1242.6 level. 
M$from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g) with |DJ=(1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). Placement from (9/2-) to a 1129, 3/2+,5/2+ level is highly unlikely, as it requires high multipolarity of E3 or M2, inconsistent with the half-life of 0.55 ns for the 1339.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, and B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 
E$other: 470.2 {I4} from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g). other: |?4.6 from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1394.9 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g), 1394.4 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g), and 1394.7 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g). Other: 100 {I14} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=2, Q from DCO ratios; E2 from RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 714.3 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) and 713.7 {I2} from (p,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 873.8 {I3} from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 904.1 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) and 904.5 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g),({+12}C,pn|g) and RUL; |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+19}F,|a2p|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$other: 312.7 {I10} from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 15 {I5} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 29 {I14} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g) and ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 716.1 {I4} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 716.6 {I3} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 37 {I12} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 29 {I14} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1186.4 {I3} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 1186.2 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g). Other: 100 {I29} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g) and ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 671.8 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 671.5 {I3} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 39 {I8} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 33 {I10} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g) and ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from ({+19}F,|a2p|g). Other: 1075.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g). Other: 100 {I14} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g) and ({+19}F,|a2p|g); E2 from RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 844.0 {I3} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) and 844.3 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 1075.9 {I2} in (|a,2n|g),({+12}C,pn|g). 
M$D+Q, |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+19}F,|a2p|g); M1+E2 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 451.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 451.2 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
RI$weighted average of 92 {I17} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 84 {I34} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 810.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 809.9 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g). Other: 100 {I34} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g), most likely E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$other: 820.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$other: 626.4 {I3} from ({+16}O,3p|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 24.6 {I29} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 78 {I22} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$D, |DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M1 from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 995.9 {I3} with I|g=100 {I33} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 943.4 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 943.5 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 455.2 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 455.4 {I2} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$|DJ=1 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1137.5 {I2} from ({+16}O,3p|g) and 1136.6 {I3} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,3p|g). Other: 1301.3 {I5} from ({+19}F,|a2p|g) 
M$Q, |DJ=2 from |g|g(DCO) in ({+16}O,3p|g); M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$this placement from (9/2-) to a 1129.9, (3/2-,5/2+) level is highly unlikely, as it requires high multipolarity of E3 or M2, inconsistent with the half-life of 0.55 ns for the 1339.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$In coincidence with the 925|g 
E$|g from 1980Gu05. A 414|g doublet with I|g=3.3 {I4} was reported by 1977He08, but 1980Gu05 do not observed a 414|g in any of the eight heavy-ion reactions studied by them, rather these authors observed a weak 418|g. In the later studies by 1994Zi01 and 1999Fo02, neither the 414|g nor the 418|g were confirmed, that is why 418|g is labeled here as uncertain by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in 1980Gu05. Note that sign of A{-2} is listed as positive in one place but negative in the other. The former sign seems a misprint. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ intensity in 1980Gu05 is reported as small, thus the placement of this |g ray by 1977He08 is suspect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 46.0 {I3} ({+72}Se |e decay), 45.8 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 45.90 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 45.9 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 46.0 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)) 
M$from |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 167.9 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 167.80 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 167.6 {I1} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 167.8 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 167.6 {I1} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I21} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 100 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 100.0 {I17} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 213.7 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 213.72 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 213.6 {I1} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 213.7 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 213.6 {I1} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 82.5 {I21} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 81 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 79.7 {I17} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 74.7 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 74.79 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 17 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 9.0 {I15} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 242.6 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 242.52 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I30} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 100 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 288.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 288.43 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 17.5 {I17} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 12.5 {I8} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 96.1 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 96.10 {I15} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 96.1 {I1} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 96.0 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 96.1 {I1} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2 
M$from {+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0113 {I10} 
E$weighted average of 309.9 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 309.78 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 309.7 {I1} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 309.7 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 309.7 {I1} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1 
E$weighted average of 104.6 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 104.52 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 105.2 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I15} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 100 {I12} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 318.6 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 318.25 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 319.4 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 7.0 {I20} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 10.2 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2). Other: 91 ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 53.1 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 53.04 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 53.1 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 53.0 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)) 
M$from {+70}Ge(|a,np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.00232 {I24} 
E$weighted average of 414.6 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 414.48 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 414.1 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)) 
M$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2 and 69|a(|a,n|g). Other: M=E1 {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 392.9 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 392.72 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 43 {I16} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 121.6 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 121.84 {I10} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 30 {I10} {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 226.3 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 226.21 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100 {I10} {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 213.0 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 212.85 {I19} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2, other: 40 {I20} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 455.5 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2, other: 94 {I10} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 501.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 501.43 {I25} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2, other: 100 {I12} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 215.5 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 215.59 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 70 {I10} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 60 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 525.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 525.32 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I10} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 100 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 144.7 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 144.58 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 63.5 {I24} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 52 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+59}Co({+16}O,n2p|g) 
E$weighted average of 200.0 {I1} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 200.1 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 565.2 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 540.6 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 540.33 {I9} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 25.0<({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 586.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 586.41 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I13} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 100 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 179.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 179.16 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 36.0 {I20} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 230.7 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 230.68 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 40 {I20} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 283.9 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 283.80 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100<({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 123.3 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 123.27 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100 {I8} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 336.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 336.24 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100 {I30} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 598.9 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 598.81 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100 {I9} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 644.5 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 644.90 {I12} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 9.1<({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 210.5 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 210.30 {I8} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 9 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 332.0 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 331.98 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 11.2<({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 361.7 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 361.64 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 300.2 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 299.94 {I11} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2), 299.9 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 300.0 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 299.9 {I2} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)). 
M$from {+69}Ga(|a,n|g); other: M1 {+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 283.8 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 283.47 {I6} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100<({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 627.8 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 627.61 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 80 {I20} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 673.7 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 673.61 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 55 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 345.3 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 345.19 {I26} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
M$from {+69}Ga(|a,n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 420.1 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 419.82 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 77 {I15} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 729.5 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 729.52 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100 {I18} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 458.6 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 458.39 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: <100 ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 533.5 {I10} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 533.28 {I7} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 701.0 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 700.99 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 379.6 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 379.83 {I18} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 100<({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 794.2 {I3} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 794.26 {I5} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2) 
RI$from {+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 2; other: 24 {I9} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 265.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 265.2 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)). 
RI$weighted average of 24.5 {I15} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 18 {I3} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 28 {I3} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 465.8 {I4} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 465.5 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 465.3 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 465.5 {I2} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)). 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I13} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 100 {I8} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 271.4 {I1} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 271.1 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I12} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 50 {I6} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 87 {I4} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 471.7 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 471.2 {I2} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 71 {I24} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 100 {I10} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 100 {I5} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 418.9 {I2} ({+72}Ge(p,n|g):set 1), 418.3 {I1} ({+59}Co({+19}F,|apn|g), {+65}Cu({+12}C,|an|g)), 418.1 {I2} ({+70}Ge(|a,np|g), {+72}Ge(|a,3np|g)), 418.3 {I1} ({+62}Ni({+13}C,p2n|g)) 
RI$from {+70}Ge(|a,np|g),{+72}Ge(|a,3np|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I7}, pol=+0.27 {I10} for unresolved lines: 1273|g and 1276.3|g. 
RI$Composite value for unresolved lines: 1273|g and 1276.3G|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$reported (1976Ma20) as in coincidence with 96|g but not with 53|g. Placement considered uncertain by the evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.137 {i20}; LM/K=0.18 {i4} 
M$quadrupole from |a(exp). M2 ruled out by parity deduced from E1 of 213.7|g and level T{-1/2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$others: 67.07 {I10} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h), 67.07 {I10} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m), and 67.1 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$from ce and |g|g(|q) data in {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 84.0 {I1} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 84.36 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 169.72 {I6} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 169.64 {I8} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 2.85 {I24} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 2.9 {I5} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 253.70 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m), 254.1 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g), and 254.02 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: |d=0.22 {I8} from ce data in (p,n|g). Value from {+73}Se |e decay is preferred as level is strongly populated in this decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 139.47 {I8} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 139.44 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 6.99 {I20} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 3.5 {I14} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 309.3 {I4} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 
RI$weighted average of 10.14 {I19} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 11.1 {I12} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: <0.55 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 393.43 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 393.42 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 100 {I11} from (p,n|g) 
MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay. Other: <0.45 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 361.2 {I3} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 361.1 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) 
M,MR$from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h). Other: |d<0.15 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$others: 442.3 {I3} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 442.3 {I4} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 
RI$weighted average of 19.0 {I11} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h), and 19.5 {I19} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h). Other: 100 {I14} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g), |?100 from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 181.06 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 181.15 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 56.1 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 32 {I15} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: ce data in (p,n|g) gives M1 or E1(+M2) with |d<0.24 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 320.53 {I8} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 320.59 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 100 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 490.24 {I17} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 490.23 {I12} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 10 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E,RI$others: 577.63 {I27} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m), 577.4 {I2} from (|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) and ce data in (p,n|g). Other: (E2) from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 
MR$from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 262.01 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 262.06 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 10 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: |d<0.6 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 401.47 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m), 401.3 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g), and 401.47 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Others: 100 {I8} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) and 100 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: |d<0.7 from ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 570.96 {I27} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 571.09 {I6} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 19.4 {I6} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 20 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 588.28 {I17} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 588.39 {I15} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 7.0 {I4} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 8.2 {I18} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 655.30 {I14} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 655.50 {I11} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 9.5 {I1} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 10 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 702.58 {I23} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 
RI$weighted average of 60.9 {I9} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 59 {I6} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) with |d=-0.25 {I+44-56} or +1.2<|d<-5.7 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 769.59 {I10} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 769.85 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data in (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 100 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 794.0 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 71 {I8} from {+64}Ni({+12}C,p2n|g) and 62 {I5} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g). Other: 17 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g), 
M$from |g(|q) and ce data in (p,n|g), |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,p2n|g) 
MR$or +3.7<|d<-1.2, from |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 861.1 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) 
RI$from {+64}Ni({+12}C,p2n|g). Other: 100 {I11} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) and ce data in (p,n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) and |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E,RI$other: 926.19 {I15}, I|g=80 {I26} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) 
M,MR$from |g(|q) and ce data in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 993.52 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 993.78 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$others: 609.17 {I19} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 609.3 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) 
M$from ce data and |g(|q) in (p,n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 823.68 {I8} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 823.99 {I8} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 22 {I7} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 993.28 {I6} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 993.63 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 13 {I5} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1077.64 {I5} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1077.91 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1019.54 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1019.87 {I13} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 39 {I13} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1086.78 {I8} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1086.99 {I5} from (p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 53 {I17} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1110.64 {I6} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h), 1111.1 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) and 1111.00 {I2} from (p,n|g) 
M$from |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 765.07 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 765.25 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h). Other: 100 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M,MR$from ce data and |g(|q) in (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 847.16 {I17} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 847.52 {I12} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) {+73}As G 1207.9 3 {I8} 1 
RI$weighted average of 63 {I5} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 63 {I6} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1207.9 {I3} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 1208.0 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 3.1 {I8} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 13.5 {I19} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 865.09 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h), 865.3 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g), and 865.5 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) and ce data in (p,n|g), D from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 783.7 {I3} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 783.33 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 865.09 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h), 865.3 {I2} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g), and 865.5 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 33 {I17} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 26 {I11} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 643.9 {I3} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 643.96 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 16 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 724.80 {I12} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 724.69 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 100 {I50} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1045.58 {I22} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1045.33 {I6} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from (p,n|g). Other: 23 {I13} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1215.80 {I24} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1214.97 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 16 {I6} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1232.40 {I19} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1232.30 {I15} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 22 {I8} from (p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 646.7 {I3} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 646.82 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1.8 {I9} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 792.48 {I22} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 792.12 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 26.5 {I22} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 20 {I6} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 908.46 {I19} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 908.86 {I20} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 32.0 {I11} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 25 {I10} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1302.04 {I6} from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m) and 1302.25 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (39.8 m). Other: 100 {I12} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 818.65 {I15} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 818.76 {I15} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 27.3 {I14} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 30 {I4} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 900.73 {I10} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 901.01 {I2} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h). Other: 100 {I11} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (|a,2n|g). Other: I|g=183 {I46} in ({+12}C,p2n|g) 
M$possible |DJ=0, dipole transition in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 557.9 {I5} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 558.0 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h). Other: and 31 {I6} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1340.50 {I7} from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) and 1341.2 {I3} from {+73}Ge(p,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Se |e decay (7.15 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from ({+12}C,p2n|g) 
M$|DJ=0, dipole transition from |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,p2n|g). 1977He08 in (|a,2n|g) gives Mult.=M1+E2 with |DJ=1 based on |g(|q). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g). This |g is placed from a separate level with a similar energy to the level for 1002.6|g by 1977He08 in (|a,2n|g), however, there is no strong evidence to support this placement and thus the existence of these two levels and the recent study by 2015Ra20 in ({+12}C,p2n|g) reports that a 1002|g and a 1110|g are from the same level. 
RI$from ({+12}C,p2n|g) 
M$from |g(DCO) in ({+12}C,p2n|g) and |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 24 {I7} from {+64}Ni({+12}C,p2n|g) and 28 {I4} from {+71}Ga(|a,2n|g) 
M$from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
M$|g|g(|q) and RUL 
MR$-0.001 {I15} from 67|g(|q,H,t) (1988Be39). Other: +0.035 {I17} from (361|g)(67|g)(|q) if 361|g is M2 (1963Bo26) 
$K/LM=10.2 {I2} (1956Ha10), 7.6 (1951Sc70). 
$ A{-2}U{-2}=+0.267 {I12} (1988Be39) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
MR$from 361|g(|q,H,t) (1988Be39); A{-2}U{-2}=-0.346 {I9} 
$|a(K)exp=0.0105 {I12}, |a(L)exp=0.00124 {I19} (1971Vo10) normalized to ce data for 84|g. 
$K/L=8.4 {I7} (1971Vo10), 8 {I2} (1956Ha10), 8.6 (1951Sc70) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ ICE(K)=10.8 22 
M$from Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp is larger than that for E2 or M1, but marginally agrees with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1958Ch34, who originally assigned this |g to {+73}Ge. E|g=67.06 {I3} from 1997So08 is in agreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Other |a(K)exp=0.00765 {I17} (1971LiZN) gives |d(E2/M1)=0.21 {I2} 
RI$9.5 {I5} (1991ZaZY), 10.2 {I4} (1980Te01), 11.0 {I7} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp gives |d(E3/M2)<0.15 
$Other |a(K)exp=0.0154 {I16} (1971LiZN) gives |d(E3/M2)=0.45 {i18} 
RI$100.0 {I5} (1991ZaZY), 100 {I2} (1980Te01), 100 {I5} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.15 
$I|g(443.0)/I|g(510.0)=0.19 {I2} 
RI$4.5 {I6} (1991ZaZY), 5.3 {I2} (1980Te01), 5.2 {I3} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.5 {I+5-2} or +5 {I+52-3} (1975Va03); lower |d value supported by |a(K)exp 
RI$11.0 {I9} (1991ZaZY), 13.9 {I3} (1980Te01), 15.0 {I8} (1975Va03) 
$Tentative double placement from 1087 level by 1975Va03 not supported by |g|g data of 1997So08 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Va03 
$A{-2}=-0.034 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I5}; |d(M2/E1)=+1.39 {I+8-6} (2004Si28). Such a large mixing ratio for E1+M2 transition is highly unlikely. Strong 164.2|g in spectral Fig.1 of 2004Si28 most likely belongs to {+76}As 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>0.8 or E2(+M3) with |d<0.2. |DJ|p consistent with E2 
$I|g(515.8)/I|g(769.8)=0.15 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$-0.25 {I+44-56} or +1.2<|d<-5.7 from |g(|q) (1975Va03) 
$I|g(702.8)/I|g(769.8)=0.60 {I5} 
RI$11.9 {I8} (1991ZaZY), 11.4 {I3} (1980Te01), 10.3 {I6} (1975Va03) for doublets 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
MR$others: +5.1<|d<-6.3 (1975Va03) and -0.74 {I160} (2004Si28) from | g(|q) 
RI$8.3 {I6} (1991ZaZY), 9.2 {I2} (1980Te01), 9.1 {I5} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=+0.065 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.009 {I24}; |d(E2/M1)=-0.74 {I160}; I|g(770)/I|g(703)=60.5/39.5 (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.19 {I+19-17} or +5.1<|d<-6.3 from |g(|q) (1975Va03); lower value is consistent with |a(K)exp 
RI$13.2 {I7} (1991ZaZY), 9.2 {I2} (1980Te01), 10.4 {I6} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.003 {I16}, A{-4}=0.000 {I16}; |d(E2/M1)=+0.2 {I+1-2} (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(467.1)/I|g(860.6)=0.05 {I1} 
RI$4.1 {I5} (1991ZaZY), 4.2 {I2} (1980Te01), 4.6 {I3} (1975Va03) for 468.3|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+0.21 {I+15-18} or +3.5<|d<-4.0 from |g(|q) (1975Va03) 
$I|g(793.5)/I|g(860.6)=0.62 {I5} 
RI$14.0 {I7} (1991ZaZY), 11.7 {I2} (1980Te01), 11.6 {I6} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.09 {I+35-75} or +3.7<|d<-1.2 from |g(|q) (1975Va03). |a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>1.6 or E2(+M3) with |d<0.25 
RI$29.1 {I9} (1991ZaZY), 19.4 {I3} (1980Te01), 18.7 {I10} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=+0.004 {I37}, A{-4}=0.004 {I42}; |d(M3/E2)=-1.0 {I3}; I|g(861)/I|g(793)=66.0/34.0 (2004Si28). Such admixture of M3 is highly unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in 1975Va03, |a(K)exp gives M1,E2 
$I|g(926.7)/I|g(993.8)=0.82 {I8} 
RI$10.8 {I6} (1991ZaZY), 8.4 {I2} (1980Te01), 7.3 {I4} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives M1,E2 or E2(+M3) with |d<0.34. |DJ|p consistent with E2 
RI$12.3 {I6} (1991ZaZY), 10.6 {I2} (1980Te01), 9.3 {I5} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.033 {I35}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I36}; |d(M3/E2)=+0.5 {I1} or +3.0 {I+6-7}; I|g(994):I|g(927):I|g(600):I|g(416):39.7:31.9:23.9:4.5 (2004Si28). Such admixtures of M3 are highly unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>1.2 or E2(+M3) with |d<0.15 
$|d(O/Q)=-0.02 {I3} or +13 {I4} from |g(|q) (1975Va03) 
RI$18.4 {I9} (1991ZaZY), 20.8 {I4} (1980Te01), 22.3 {I12} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=+0.096 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I6}; |d(M3/E2)=+10.6 {I+2-3} (2004Si28). Such admixture of M3 is highly unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(833.07)/I|g(1002.6)=0.80 {I31} 
RI$5.8 {I4} (1991ZaZY), 1.4 {I1} (1980Te01) 
$Placement from |g|g data of 1997So08. 1975Va03 proposed this |g from 1344 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp gives M1 or E2, or E2(+M3) with |d<0.35. |DJ|p consistent with E2 
RI$4.3 {I3} (1991ZaZY), 1.8 {I1} (1980Te01), 2.0 {I2} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.035 {I58}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I58}; |d(M3/E2)=+1.50 {I1}; I|g(1087):I|g(1020):I|g(1003):I|g(833):I|g(694)=12.4:25.8:29.5:23.4:9.0 (2004Si28). Such admixture of M3 is highly unlikely 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(1086.99)/I|g(1002.6)=0.53 {I17} 
RI$1.0 {I4} (1991ZaZY), 0.9 {I1} (1980Te01), 0.7 {I1} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$24.5 {I3} (1991ZaZY), 23.3 {I4} (1980Te01), 20.0 {I10} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=+0.002 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I16}; |d(E2/M1)=+0.5 {I+2-1} (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(451.4)/I|g(1154.2)=0.12 {I2} 
RI$0.9 {I2} (1991ZaZY), 1.2 {I1} (1980Te01), 1.2 {I2} (1975Va03) 
$Placement from |g|g data of 1997So08. 1975Va03 proposed this |g tentatively from 1489 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$I|g(643.4)/I|g(1154.2)=0.10 {I2} 
RI$1.5 {I3} (1991ZaZY), 1.5 {I1} (1980Te01), 1.7 {I2} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1975Va03 
RI$8.6 {I7} (1991ZaZY), 11.3 {I2} (1980Te01), 9.7 {I5} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=+0.027 {I30}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I30}; |d(E2/M1)=-0.3 {I1}; I|g(1154):I|g(643):I|g(451)=79.6:11.0:9.4 (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.31 {I+12-28} or -1.6 {i6} from |g(|q) (1975Va03); |a(K)exp gives | d(E2/M1)<1.0, supporting lower value from |g(|q) 
RI$9.1 {I7} (1991ZaZY), 8.6 {I2} (1980Te01), 7.8 {I5} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.013 {I53}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I54}; |d(E2/M1)=-1.80 {I+12-6}; I|g(765)/I|g(847)=59.4/40.6 (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(847.5)/I|g(765.2)=0.65 {I7} 
RI$8.9 {I5} (1991ZaZY), 6.3 {I1} (1980Te01), 10.6 {I6} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
MR$-0.06 {I+6-5} or -5.1 {I5} from |g(|q) (1975Va03) 
RI$38.0 {I2} (1991ZaZY), 31.7 {I5} (1980Te01), 32.0 {I16} (1975Va03) for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(818.8)/I|g(901.0)=0.30 {I5} 
RI$2.7 {I5} (1991ZaZY), 3.3 {I1} (1980Te01), 2.7 {I3} (1975Va03) 
$Placement from |g|g data of 1997So08. 1975Va03 proposed this |g from 1589 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
RI$8.7 {I5} (1991ZaZY), 8.1 {I2} (1980Te01), 6.9 {I4} (1975Va03) 
$I|g(901)/I|g(819)=77.2/22.8 (2004Si28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(350.8)/I|g(1277.5)=0.27 {I4} 
RI$1.7 {I9} (1991ZaZY), 1.3 {I1} (1980Te01), 0.5 {I2} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(689.0)/I|g(1277.5)=0.49 {I7} 
RI$1.7 {I3} (1991ZaZY), 2.3 {I2} (1980Te01), 1.6 {I2} (1975Va03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$4.4 {I7} (1991ZaZY), 5.3 {I1} (1980Te01), 5.8 {I6} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.032 {I50}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I51}; |d(E2/M1)=+1.3 {I+5-4}; I|g(1277)/I|g(689)=73.1/26.9 (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$4.0 {I3} (1991ZaZY), 3.5 {I2} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=+0.018 {I72}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I73}; |d(E2/M1)=-1.8 {I1} or -0.2 {I1}; I|g(452)/I|g(979)=32.1/67.9 (2004Si28). Note that 452|g is placed from a 1221 level based on |g|g-coin data in 1997So08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$9.0 {I7} (1991ZaZY), 7.3 {I5} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.023 {I50}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I50}; |d(E2/M1)=+0.5 {I1}; I|g(480):I|g(697):I|g(787)=17.1:55.7:27.2 (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$8.2 {I9} (1991ZaZY), 3.5 {I7} (1975Va03) 
$A{-2}=-0.045 {I60}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I60}; |d(E2/M1)=-1.3 {I+10-6}; I|g(1546)/I|g(1103)=79.5/20.5 (2004Si28). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$3.3 {I4} (1991ZaZY), 3.5 {I3} (1975Va03) 
$This |g shown incorrectly (by 1975Va03 in Fig. 4) from 1962 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$DCO value is inconsistent with 15/2- to 13/2+, dipole transition as given in Table I of 2015Ra20. DCO is also too large for |DJ=2,Q or |DJ=0, dipole. It seems consistent with |DJ=0 or 1, dipole with significant quadrupole admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.34 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} from (|a,2n|g) (1977He08) 
$A{-2}=+0.30 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} from ({+18}O,2np|g) (1977He08) 
E$in delayed coincidence with 361G (1974Pr14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I9} from (|a,2n|g) (1977He08) 
$A{-2}=+0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I7} from ({+18}O,2np|g) (1977He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.36 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I16} from (|a,2n|g) (1977He08) 
$A{-2}=+0.31 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I9} from ({+18}O,2np|g) (1977He08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$0.023 {I3} (1973Ki11), 0.018 {I1} (1976La10) 
A{-2}=-0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (at 3.80 MeV, 1973Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.016 {I3} (1973Ki11), 0.016 {I1} (1976La10). 
$|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.0020 {I3} (1973Ki11) 
A{-2}=-0.25 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (at 3.80 MeV, 1973Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.0112 {I17} (1973Ki11), 0.013 {I2} (1976La10). 
$E(L+M)C=0.0014 {I6} (1973Ki11) 
A{-2}=+0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (at 3.80 MeV, 1973Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.0070 {I10} (1973Ki11), 0.0075 {I8} (1976La10) 
A{-2}=-0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (at 3.80 MeV, 1973Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.131 {I2} (1973Ki11), 0.12 {I3} (1976La10). 
A{-2}=-0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (at 3.80 MeV, 1973Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.0086 {I20} (1973Ki11), 0.0077 {I20} (1976La10) 
A{-2}=-0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (at 3.80 MeV, 1973Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.019 {I4} (1973Ki11), 0.023 {I6} (1976La10). 
$|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.0026 {I10} (1973Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.0041 {I9} (1973Ki11), 0.0035 {I4} (1976La10). 
$|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.00051 {I20} (1973Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.029 {I4} (1973Ki11), 0.031 {I2} (1976La10). 
$|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.0042 {I7} (1973Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.030 {I8} (1973Ki11), 0.020 {I3} (1976La10). 
$|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.009 {I7} (1973Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$others: 0.0097 {I25} (1973Ki11), 0.0091 {I6} (1976La10) 
$|a(L+...)exp|a(M)exp=0.0023 {I13} (1973Ki11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2,E3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ questionable |g ray due to M2 or E3 multipolarity involved, and poor fit in level scheme. Level-energy difference=561.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$if it is placed from the 1080 level, J(1080) is consistent with 5/2 
M,MR$the authors give |d=+1.07 for E1+M2 if J|p of 1080 level is 5/2+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.195 {I11} 
MR$other: -1.1 {I2} (1967Ro14), but |d=-0.50 agrees better with 0.60 {I5} from Adopted T{-1/2} and B(E2) values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=198.64 1 (2005Ra29) 
MR$from B(E2) and T{-1/2}(199 level). |a(K)exp=0.0186 {I11} gives 0.39 {I5}. Other: |a(K)exp=0.0166 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00122 {I4} (2005Ra29) 
(66|g)(199|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.013 {I27}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I5} (1973Su10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=66.03 1 (2005Ra29) 
MR$from |g|g(|q) (1983Si25). Others: 0.11 {I6} (from |a(K)exp=0.29 {I3}), +0.18 {I3} (from |g|g(|q) 1973Su10). |d=0.18 is unlikely since it gives B(E2)(W.u.) much larger than RUL(E2)=300. |a(K)exp=0.308 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0287 {I3} (2005Ra29) 
(136|g)(66|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.038 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I3} (1983Si25) 
A2=+0.015 5, A4=+0.014 16 (1973Su10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=264.65 1 (2005Ra29) 
MR$unweighted average of 0.16 {I5} (from |a(K)exp=0.0067 {I2}), 0.0362 {I15} (from T{-1/2} and B(E2) 1967Ro14), -0.01 {I4} (|g(|q) in (|g,|g') 1967La07) and following |d values from (136|g)(265|g)(|q): -0.043 {I6} (1968Sp02), -0.044 {I17} (1968Vi02), -0.061 {I18} (1969Be23), -0.043 {I25} (1969Ra12), -0.15 {I4} (1973Su10). |a(K)exp=0.0062, |a(L)exp=0.00054 {I1} (2005Ra29) 
(136|g)(265|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.033 {I1}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I2} (1968Sp02). 
A2=-0.030 3, A4=+0.004 6 (1969Be23); A2=-0.033, A4=+0.001 (1969Ra12); A2=-0.013 5, A4=-0.006 (1973Su10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=279.59 1 (2005Ra29) 
MR$unweighted average of 0.61 {I6} (from |a(K)exp=0.0083 {I4}), 0.60 {I5} (from T{-1/2} and B(E2) 1967Ro14), -0.42 {I8} (from |g(|q) in (|g,|g') 1967La07), -0.50 {I14} (|g(|q) in Coul. ex.) and following values from (121|g)(280|g)(|q): -0.48 {I3} (1968Sp02), -0.39 {I1} (1969Be23), -0.45 {I3} (1973Su10), -0.48 {I4} (1989Mo14). Other: -0.250 {I9} (1968Vi02). |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I1} (2005Ra29) 
(121|g)(280|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.431 {I10} (1989Mo14) 
A2=-0.423 6, A4=+0.03 4 (1973Su10) 
A2=-0.430 6, A4=+0.009 7 (1968Sp02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2(+E3)
decay_comment:
E$ from level-energy difference. E|g=24.34 {I1} (2005Ra29) fits poorly 
RI$ weighted averaged value of 0.047 is reduced to 0.043, so that there is no |e feeding to 303.9, 9/2+ level from 5/2+ parent, as expected 
MR$<0.026 from RUL(E3)<100. Others: 0.051 {I12} (from |a(K)exp=182 {I24} and |a(L)exp=45 {I45}) and -0.18 {I2} (from (24|g)(280|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.009 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} (1977Pu04)) give B(E3)(W.u.)>100. |a(K)exp=180 {I5} (2005Ra29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
$ EG=303.96 1 (2005Ra29) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.048 {I3}. Other: |a(K)exp=0.045 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00473 {I8} (2005Ra29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=121.12 2 (2005Ra29) 
M$from |a(K)exp (1960Gr03) and K-shell particle parameters from (121ce(K))(280|g)(|q)(1969Be23,1968Sp02). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0384 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00385 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.00062 {I1} (2005Ra29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=136.00 1 (2005Ra29) 
M$from |a(K)exp (1960Gr03) and K-shell particle parameters from (136ce(K))(265|g)(|q)(1969Be23,1968Sp02). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0250 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00249 {I2}, |a(M)exp=0.000382 {I4} (2005Ra29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=400.65 1 (2005Ra29) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I1}. Other: |a(K)exp=0.00123 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.000126 {I4} (2005Ra29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=572.2 4 (1977Pr08) 
MR$from (|g(|q) in Coul. ex.,1967Ro14). |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I1} from 1970Pa25 and 0.0010 {I3} from 2005Ra29 give M1+E2 with |d<1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$D+Q from ce data with |d(E2/M1)=0.065 {I25}, |d(M2/E1)=0.095 {I10}. From adopted level parities, |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$dipole from ce data in (p,n|g) with |d(E2/M1)=0, |d(M2/E1)<0.3. From adopted level parities, |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g reported in (p,n|g) only. It is considered doubtful since this intensity should have been detected in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
$From ce data in (n,|g),E=thermal, |d(M2/E1)=0.18 {I6}, |d(E2/M1)<0.1. From ce data in (p,n|g), |d(E2/M1)=0.29 {I6} for 157.4|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy difference=6264.065 
E$fitted value deviates by 2.32 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy difference=6294.287 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.54 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6343.009 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.36 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6393.162 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.20 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6583.582 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.63 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6587.064 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.97 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6642.394 
E$fitted value deviates by 1.50 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6691.269 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.47 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6718.544 
E$fitted value deviates by 1.15 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy difference=6810.928 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.42 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6823.301 
E$fitted value deviates by 1.21 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=6964.586 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.72 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=7208.210 
E$fitted value deviates by 0.73 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp and |a(L1)exp agree with E1 somewhat better than with M1. Measured L1/L2 ratio disagrees with both E1 and M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=0.095 {I10}, |d(E2/M1)=0.065 {I25}. 1990Ho10 give mult=M1. Adopted level parities give |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
M$ce(K)/(ce(L)+ce(M))=9.5 {I20} (1971Ba69) indicates mult=dipole. 1983Ga06 use this |g-ray (assumed as E1) to normalize the ce data for other transitions. For 86.9|g, the |a(K) values corresponding to E1 and M1 multipolarity are within 10% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all the intensity is assigned from 211 level. The placement from 518 level is questionable 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)>1.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity is assigned from 307 level. Placement from 549 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=7.4 {I6}. Intensity is divided based on branching in (n,|g),E=thermal 
$|a(K)exp gives |d(E2/M1)<0.15 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity assigned from 307 level. The placement from 265 level is questionable 
$|a(K)exp=0.0047 {I6} for doublet. |d(E2/M1)=0.19 {I7}. Agreement of |a(K)exp with mult=M1 (with |d(E2/M1)=0) is marginal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity is assigned from 352 level. A small fraction (|?0.4) may belong from 307 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity assigned from 362.7 level. Placement from 402 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E,RI$placement based on (n,|g),E=thermal. Placement from 402 level is not supported by (n,|g),E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity placed from 499 level. Placement from 460 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.2 
RI$from |g|g-coin and from (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity is assigned from 504 level. Placement from 543 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, placement from 504 level is questionable, and all of the intensity of this |g is placed from 785 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$placement based on (n,|g),E=thermal. All intensity assigned from 504 level. Placement from 460 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E,RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, this placement is questionable, and all of the intensity of this |g is placed from 629 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, all intensity is placed from 554 level. Placement from 449 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$placement from (n,|g),E=thermal. All intensity assigned from 628.7 level 
M$if E1+M2 with |d=0.33 {I4} from |a{-K}(exp), it would require an isomeric T{-1/2}>1.3 |ms; but M1+E2 with |d=0.29 {I6} from |a{-K}(exp) for 157|g to (2)- inconsistent with adopted |p=(+), which would suggest (E1). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (n,|g),E=thermal, intensity is split between 637 and 640 levels. Placement form 517 level is questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$-1.46 {I2} or -0.321 {I11} from (211|g)(264|g)(|q) and (367|g)(264|g)(|q) (1974LeYO). Other: -0.8 {I3} from (211|g)(264|g)(|q) (1989Mo14) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00193 {I4}, B(E2)(W.u.)=36.5 {I6} for |d(E2/M1)=1.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$B(M2)(W.u.)>1.8, compared to the limit <1 from RUL. The discrepancy could be due to too large a value of |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=215.51 {I10}, I|g=51.6 {I13} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=215.505 {I22}, I|g=53.1 {I13} (1974LeYO) 
MR$from (416|g)(215|g)(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=264.37 {I11}, I|g=100 (2012Me04) 
$E|g=264.440 {I17}, I|g=100 (1974LeYO) 
MR$|d=-1.46 {I2} or -0.321 {I11} from (211|g)(264|g)(|q) and (367|g)(264|g)(|q). Other: -0.8 {I3} from (211|g)(264|g)(|q) (1989Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M2+E3)
decay_comment:
$E|g=211.05 {I10}, I|g=55.1 {I14} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=211.031 {I19}, I|g=57.2 {I14} (1974LeYO) 
MR$from reanalysis of |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=419.71 {I11}, I|g=2.29 {I8} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=419.754 {I26}, I|g=2.284 {I24} (1974LeYO) 
$(420|g)(195|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.012 {I30}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ from 1974LeYO, but uncertainty increased from 0.03 to 0.10 keV 
$E|g=614, I|g=1.05 {I15}; E|g=614.43 {I10}, I|g=1.24 {I4} for the doublet (2012Me04) 
$E|g=614.36 {I3}, I|g=0.94 {I9} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=367.33 {I10}, I|g=28.4 {I7} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=367.397 {I16}, I|g=26.0 {I3} (1974LeYO) 
M$dipole from (367|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.374 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I7}; |DJ|p requires E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=416.29 {I10}, I|g=44.5 {I11} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=416.328 {I14}, I|g=40.5 {I4} (1974LeYO) 
$(416|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.014 {I3}, A{-4}=0.000 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$ from 2012Me04. I|g=0.427 {I15} (1974LeYO) is in disagreement 
$E|g=159.40 {I35}, I|g=0.077 {I30} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=159.11 {I15}, I|g=0.427 {I15} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=520.6 {I10}, I|g=0.49 {I26} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=520, I|g=0.55 {I6} (1974LeYO) 
$(520|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=624.73 {I11}, I|g=0.374 {I13} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=624.76 {I9}, I|g=0.338 {I2} (1974LeYO) 
$(625|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=673.48 
$E|g=673.14 {I10}, I|g=1.45 {I4} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=673.09 {I3}, I|g=0.247 {I25} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=794.42 {I11}, I|g=0.617 {I18} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=794.328 {I18}, I|g=0.513 {I5} (1974LeYO) 
$(794|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$E|g=558.03 {I10}, I|g=33.5 {I8} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=558.018 {I13}, I|g=29.79 {I19} (1974LeYO) 
$E|g=557.70 {I8} (1968Do05, curved-crystal data) 
MR$from the following |g|g(|q) data: 
$(558|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.029 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I8} 
$(558|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.184 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I10} 
$(558|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.147 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.016 {I11} 
$(558|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.124 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I9} 
$(558|g)(632|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.115 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=714.39 {I10}, I|g=14.9 {I4} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=714.345 {I12}, I|g=13.26 {I7} (1974LeYO) 
$E|g=714.10 {I9} (1968Do05, curved-crystal data) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=925.51 {I11}, I|g=1.69 {I5} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=925.473 {I16}, I|g=1.33 {I13} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1006.70 
$E|g=1007.45 {I25}, I|g=0.026 {I6} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1007.47 {I20}, I|g=0.025 {I1} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=685.24 {I11}, I|g=0.181 {I10} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=685.37 {I4}, I|g=0.124 {I13} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1080.86 {I11}, I|g=0.546 {I19} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1080.82 {I8}, I|g=0.447 {I2} (1974LeYO) 
$(1081|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=339.6 {I4}, I|g=0.13 {I10} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=339 shown only in level-scheme figure 19b (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=208.68 {I11}, I|g=2.37 {I7} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=208.98 {I6}, I|g=1.75 {I4} (1974LeYO) 
$(209|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.27 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=613.99 
E$from 1974LeYO, but uncertainty increased from 0.03 to 0.10 keV 
$E|g=614, I|g=0.185 {I26}; E|g=614.43 {I10}, I|g=1.24 {I4} for the doublet (2012Me04) 
$E|g=614.36 {I3}, I|g=0.165 {I17} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=766.79 {I10}, I|g=1.64 {I5} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=766.715 {I13}, I|g=1.456 {I7} (1974LeYO) 
MR$|d=+0.2 +2 -1 for J(1399)=5/2 
$(767|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.084 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I4} 
$(767|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} 
$(767|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I7} 
$(767|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.124 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=673.14 {I10}, I|g=1.45 {I4} (2012Me04) for the doublet 
$E|g=673.09 {I3}, I|g=0.99 {I10} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=823.37 {I10}, I|g=1.26 {I4} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=823.13 {I4}, I|g=1.114 {I6} (1974LeYO) 
$(823|g)(634|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1193.33 {I10}, I|g=5.30 {I13} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1193.263 {I13}, I|g=4.764 {I24} (1974LeYO) 
$(1193|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.372 {I10},A{-4}=-0.002 {I19} (1974LeYO). For the same cascade 1975Ch32 give A{-2}=+0.643 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.051 {I6}. Note severe disagreement in the sign and magnitude of A{-2} value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1242.27 {I11}, I|g=0.840 {I24} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1242.183 {I15}, I|g=0.738 {I4} (1974LeYO) 
$(1242|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.031 {I26}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=338.54 {I12}, I|g=1.45 {I12} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=338.66 {I4}, I|g=1.24 {I3} (1974LeYO) 
$(338.6|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.089 {I26}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1974LeYO). (338.6|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.061 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.089 {I18} (1975Ch32). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=913.90 {I11}, I|g=0.774 {I22} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=913.805 {I20}, I|g=0.678 {I3} (1974LeYO) 
$(914|g)(420|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.151 {I41}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1263.95 {I10}, I|g=1.79 {I5} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1263.862 {I15}, I|g=1.573 {I8} (1974LeYO) 
MR$-1.41 {I6} or -0.079 {I13} from (1264|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.430 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=1312.88 {I11}, I|g=0.732 {I21} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1312.802 {I16}, I|g=0.664 {I3} (1974LeYO) 
MR$-5.86 {I17} or -1.03 {I11} from (1313|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=907.03 {I10}, I|g=1.97 {I5} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=906.986 {I13}, I|g=1.764 {I9} (1974LeYO) 
$(907|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.040 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} 
$(907|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I7} 
$(907|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=685.24 {I11}, I|g=0.181 {I10} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=685.37 {I4}, I|g=0.047 {I5} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=925.98 
$E|g=925.51 {I11}, I|g=1.69 {I5} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=925.473 {I16}, I|g=0.119 {I12} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=928.58 
$E|g=928.92 {I10}, I|g=2.16 {I6} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=928.853 {I12}, I|g=1.937 {I10} (1974LeYO) 
MR$from (929|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.082 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I4}; (929|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.28 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I7}; (929|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=945.57 {I18}, I|g=0.081 {I14} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=945.73 {I7}, I|g=0.057 {I1} (1974LeYO) for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1296.03 
$E|g=1295.51 {I11}, I|g=0.339 {I15} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=1295.71 {I8}, I|g=0.166 {I17} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=939.42 {I11}, I|g=0.608 {I20} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=939.350 {I15}, I|g=0.528 {I3} (1974LeYO) 
$(939|g)(634|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.13 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1309.37 {I11}, I|g=1.02 {I3} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1309.271 {I16}, I|g=0.902 {I5} (1974LeYO) 
$(1309|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=749.92 {I10}, I|g=1.87 {I5} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=749.861 {I12}, I|g=1.639 {I8} (1974LeYO) 
$(750|g)(746|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.122 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=781.31 {I10}, I|g=2.13 {I6} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=781.261 {I13}, I|g=1.879 {I9} (1974LeYO) 
$(781|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.042 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5}, (781|g)(416)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I6}, (781|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.257 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=439.49 {I11}, I|g=0.404 {I16} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=439.438 {I20}, I|g=0.375 {I4} (1974LeYO) 
$(439|g)(1085|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.121 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=461.37 {I10}, I|g=2.63 {I7} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=461.378 {I13}, I|g=2.348 {I22} (1974LeYO) 
$(461|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.011 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.001 {I31} 
$(461|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.041 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} 
$(461|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} 
$(461|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.024 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} 
$(416|g)(632|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I6} 
$(461|g)(907|g)(|q): A{-2}=+004 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
$E|g=810.40 {I10}, I|g=4.73 {I12} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=810.352 {I12}, I|g=4.210 {I21} (1974LeYO) 
MR$|d=0.194 {I30} or 2.37 {I18}. For (810|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5}, (810|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.201 {I23}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4}, (810|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.399 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3}, and (810|g)(632|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$ from 2012Me04 
$E|g=1368.45 {I10}, I|g=5.79 {I15} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1368.4 {I5} (1971Yt01). E|g=1368, I|g=6.2 {I6} (1974LeYO) 
MR$|d=-21 {I12} or 0.52 {I5}. From (1368|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.012, A{-4}=0, (1368|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.051 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3}, (1368|g)(367|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.09 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4}, (1368|g)(416|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.048 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.1 {I3}, (1368|g)(632|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1479.07 {I11}, I|g=0.453 {I16} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=1478.980 {I23}, I|g=0.158 {I16} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1846.59 {I11}, I|g=0.349 {I12} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=1846.41 {I3}, I|g=0.317 {I2} (1974LeYO) 
$(1864|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.17 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1466.5 
$E|g=1465.07 {I16}, I|g=0.133 {I18} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=1465.75 {I9}, I|g=0.111 {I11} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2077.39 {I11}, I|g=0.493 {I16} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=2077.20 {I3}, I|g=0.432 {I2} (1974LeYO) 
$(2077|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.38 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2126.32 {I11}, I|g=0.408 {I14} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=2126.15 {I3}, I|g=0.378 {I2} (1974LeYO) 
$(2126|g)(215|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.07 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1295.51 {I11}, I|g=0.339 {I15} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=1295.71 {I8}, I|g=0.111 {I11} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1465.07 {I16}, I|g=0.133 {I18} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=1465.75 {I8}, I|g=0.110 {I11} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=1479.07 {I11}, I|g=0.453 {I16} (2012Me04) for doublet 
$E|g=1478.980 {I23}, I|g=0.236 {I26} (1974LeYO) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=2089.84 {I11}, I|g=0.548 {I17} (2012Me04) 
$E|g=2089.60 {I3}, I|g=0.443 {I2} (1974LeYO) 
$(2090|g)(264|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.084 {I51}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I9}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) of 211.03|g and |a 
MR$-1.46 {I2} or -0.321 {I11} from (211|g)(264|g)(|q) and (367|g)(264|g)(|q) (1974LeYO). Other: -0.8 {I3} from (211|g)(264|g)(|q) (1989Mo14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.07 {I3} (1981Ho24). |a(K)exp also allows mult=E1, but |DJ|p implies M1. |a(K)(M1)=0.079, |a(K)(E1)=0.065, |a(K)(E2)=0.67 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 48 {I14} from {+81}Ge |b{+-} decay (6.4 s), 41 {I4} from {+81}Ge |b{+-} decay (7.6 s), and 34 {I9} from ({+16}O,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E other: 93.0 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 36 {I5} (from I|g(1+|a)=40 {I6} (2022De07) for M1, where |a(93.0)(M1)=0.1097 {I17}), and 23 {I5} (from 19 {I4} in 1980HoZN). 
%I|g=13.4 {I24} based on proposed decay-scheme normalization. 
MR from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E other: 197.1 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 26 {I6} (2022De07) and 16.1 {I12} (from 13.4 {I10} in 1980HoZN). 
M$M1 or E1 from |a(K)exp. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 290.3 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 14 {I2} (2022De07) and 8.4 {I8} (from 7.0 {I7} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 242.7 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 5.3 {I9} (2022De07) and 4.1 {I5} (from 3.4 {I4} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1,E2
decay_comment:
E other: 335.9 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI from 83 {I3} (1980HoZN). Other: 100 {I5} (2022De07) 
%I|g=58.6 {I23} based on proposed decay-scheme normalization. 
MR both |a(K)(M1) and |a(K)(E2) lie within limits of experimental uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 401.6 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 13 {I2} (2022De07) and 7.1 {I6} (from 5.9 {I5} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 737.7 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 25 {I4} (2022De07) and 20.5 {I12} (from 17 {I1} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 467.8 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 8 {I3} (2022De07 - corrected for {+81}Se transition) and 4.5 {I12} (from 3.7 {I10} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E also same 665.9 {I2} (1980HoZN - table 11) 
RI estimated value from |g-|g coin for the doublet (2022De07). Other: 3.6 from 3 (from Fig. in 1981Ho24. I|g=11.0 {I20} for multiplet in 1980HoZN, both isomers combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 758.5 {I6} (1980HoZN) 
RI weighted average of 9 {I2} (2022De07) and 9.6 {I8} (from 8.0 {I7} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 705.8 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 6 {I1} (2022De07) and 10.5 {I8} (from 8.7 {I7} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 751.4 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 10 {I2} (2022De07) and 11.7 {I8} (from 9.7 {I7} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 747.3 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 8 {I2} (2022De07) and 12.4 {I8} (from 10.3 {I7} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 792.8 {I2} (2022De07), 792.9 {I3} in Table 1. 
RI estimated value from |g-|g coin for the doublet (2022De07). Other: 8.4 from 7 (From Fig in 1981Ho24. I|g=55 {I2} for doublet in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 990.5 {I2} (2022De07) and 990.3 {I4} (1980HoZN). 
RI weighted average of 1.5 {I3} (2022De07) and 2.4 {I12} (from 2 {I1} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1083.2 {I3} (1980HoZN) 
RI unweighted average of 1.9 {I4} (2022De07) and 4.8 {I12} (from 4 {I1} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 391.3 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 4.6 {I8} (2022De07) and 4.0 {I4} (from 3.3 {I3} in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 792.8 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI estimated value from |g-|g coin for the doublet (2022De07). Other: 58 from 48 (From Fig in 1981Ho24. I|g=55 {I2} for doublet in 1980HoZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 859.0 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 13.6 {I11} (from 11.3 {I9} in 1980HoZN) and 9 {I2} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 875.9 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI$weighted average of 19.3 {I14} from (from 16.0 {I12} in 1980HoZN) and 14 {I3} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1156.3 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 14.2 {I10} from (from 11.8 {I8} in 1980HoZN) and 9 {I2} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1012.9 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 16.1 {I13} (from 13.4 {I11} in 1980HoZN) and 11 {I2} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: Also 1058.6 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 6.1 {I4} (from 5.1 {I3} in 1980HoZN) and 4.5 {I9} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 1100.1 {I2} (2022De07) and 1100.3 {I2} (1980HoZN). 
RI weighted average of 3.9 {I5} (from 3.2 {I4} in 1980HoZN) and 3.1 {I6} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E in 1980HoZN, a comparable 2103.9|g {I3} placed from 2862 keV level in the isomeric {+81}Ge |b- decay (7.6 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 637.3 {I3} (1980HoZN) 
RI weighted average of 2.9 {I6} (from 2.4 {I5} in 1980HoZN) and 4.0 {I7} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 482.5 {I2} (2022De07). 
RI weighted average of 13.3 {I12} (from 11 {I1} in 1980HoZN) and 12 {I2} (2022De07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1429.6 {I5} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 13.6 {I7} (from 11.3 {I6} in 1980HoZN) and 9 {I2} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1495.7 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 33.7 {I11} (from 28.0 {I9} in 1980HoZN) and 23 {I4} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1582.7 {I8} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 10.7 {I7} (from 8.9 {I6} in 1980HoZN) and 7 {I1} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1886.9 {I5} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 1.9 {I2} (from 1.6 {I2} in 1980HoZN) and 2.8 {I6} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 133.6 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 7.5 {I5} (from 6.2 {I4} in 1980HoZN) and 12 {I2} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 507.4 {I3} (1980HoZN, E=507.2 in Fig in 1981Ho24). 
RI unweighted average of 2.4 {I6} (from 2.0 {I5} in 1980HoZN) and 0.8 {I3} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 616.4 {I4} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 3.1 {I6} (from 2.6 {I5} - 1980HoZN) and 2.4 {I5} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1144.7 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 13.9 {I10} (from 11.5 {I8} in 1980HoZN) and 6 {I1} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1629.5 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI weighted average of 8.0 {I6} (from 6.6 {I5} in 1980HoZN) and 6 {I1} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1869.8|g {I2} multiply placed including from 1869.8 keV level in 1980HoZN in the isomeric {+81}Ge |b- decay (7.6 s). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E other: 1882.5 {I2} (2022De07) 
RI unweighted average of 22.2 {I10} from (from 18.4 {I8} in 1980HoZN) and 14 {I3} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 2207.1 {I2} (2022De07) and 2207.5 {I3} (1980HoZN) 
RI weighted average of 3.6 {I5} from (from 3.0 {I4} in 1980HoZN) and 3.9 {I8} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 2629.7 {I2} (2022De07) and 2629.9 {I2} (1980HoZN) 
RI weighted average of 7.1 {I7} from (from 5.9 {I6} in 1980HoZN) and 5 {I1} (2022De07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 665.5 {I3} (2022De07) and 665.9 {I3} (1980HoZN) 
RI estimated value from |g-|g coin for the doublet (2022De07). Other: 6 from 5 (from Fig. in 1981Ho24. I|g=11.0 {I20} for multiplet in 1980HoZN, both isomers combined). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E evaluator marks the placement as questionable and not adopted. See comments with the level. The |g is not listed to populate a comparable level in 2022De07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(875.8|g)[401.6|g](335.6|g(|q)): I|g(22|')/I|g(75|')=0.89 {I13}, I|g(46|')/I|g(75|')=0.96 {I9} 
$(875.8|g)(401.6|g(|q)): I|g(22|')/I|g(75|')=1.29 {I17}, I|g(46|')/I|g(75|')=1.15 {I11} 
$(875.8|g)(737.6|g(|q)): I|g(22|')/I|g(75|')=0.94 {I18}, I|g(46|')/I|g(75|')=0.86 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$(637.6|g)[875.8|g](737.6|g(|q)): I|g(22|')/I|g(75|')=1.32 {I26}, I|g(46|')/I|g(75|')=1.40 {I18} 
$(637.6|g)(875.8|g(|q)): I|g(22|')/I|g(75|')=0.81 {I17}, I|g(46|')/I|g(75|')=0.98 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$5 {I1} given by 2016Ko24 is relative to I|g+ce(42.8|g in {+84}As)=100 {I9} (2016Ko24). Absolute I|g per 100 decays of {+84}Ge is deduced by compiler as 2.8 {I6} using a normalization factor of 0.565 {I36} from {+84}Ge |b{+-} decay dataset in XUNDL database from 2016Ko24, which accounts for 10.2% |b{+-}n decay branch 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$large mixing ratio deduced from |g|g(|q) data suggests M1+E2 
$(323.5|g)(1543,4|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.010 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I13} 
MR$+0.25 {I12} or +2.9 {I13}, assuming J|p values of 11/2-, 9/2-, and 5/2- for the 323.5 -> 1543.4 |g cascade. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$FWHM=25 keV was observed. The uncertainty in energy results from the quadratic sum of a 6-keV uncertainty from the choice of the |b-velocity for Doppler correction due to low statistics, corresponding to a |b uncertainty of 0.005c, and a 4-keV systematics uncertainty on the transition-energy determination. The latter uncertainty has been obtained from the comparison of extracted energies and known values for a set of transitions in well-known nuclei produced by fragmentation with high statistics in this experiment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$questionable peak observed in coincidence with 927|g. 
E$note discrepancy in |DE|g which is 31 keV in text and 35 keV in abstract 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$If E1, B(E1)(W.u.)<4.3|*10{+-6}. 
$If M2, B(M2)(W.u.)<216, suggesting that transition should be dominantly E1, as RUL(M2)=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.47<|d<+3.49 in 2009Or02 
$ADO=1.7 {I6} 
$B(M2)(W.u.) is greater than RUL(M2)=1, suggesting that |d(M2/E1) should be <0.40 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
MR$from +0.47<|d<+3.49 in 2009Or02 
$ADO=1.7 {I6} 
$B(M2)(W.u.)=5.9 {I+35-29} is greater than RUL(M2)=1, suggesting that |d(M2/E1) should be <0.40 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from weighted average of 853.9 {I3} (1990Li25), 854.2 {I3} (1998Sk02), and 853.4 {I2} (2003Fi07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$No coincidence observed between 343|g and 1088|g; coincidence between 343|g and 854|g could not be established 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$from the K-conversion coefficient (1988Wi02). |a{-k}=0.0042 {I7}. E2 quoted in table I of 2004St09 is a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1988Wi02. Other: 40.2 {I3} (1988Ra06) 
ECC$28.0 {I25} (1995Po01) from intensity balance at the 39 level 
M$From |a exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$From weighted average of 534.8 {3} (1988Ra06) and 534.9 {I5} (1989Ar13).Other: 534.5 (1988Wi02) 
M$From |a(K)exp. E2 quoted in table I of 2004St09 is a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=164 {I7} 
DCO$Gating transition corresponds to |DJ=1, D+Q transition 
MR$+2.5 {I+6-4} or +0.57 {I+10-8} 
E$From 2004St09. Others: 675.8 {I3} (1988Ra06), 676.1 {I1} (2001Je10), 676.4 {I5} (1989Ar13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$I|g=51 {I5} 
E$From 2004St09. Others: 402.7 {I5} (1988Ra06), 402.8 {I3} (2001Je10), 403.2 {I5} (1989Ar13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
$I|g=18.9 {I9} 
A2$uncertainty of 0.6 on A{-2} listed by 2004St09 seems to be a misprint. 
MR$authors' report that small contamination occurred in the mixing ratio at backward angles with the 442.9 transition in {+69}As 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q(+O)
decay_comment:
MR$authors report that small contamination occurred in the mixing ratio at backward angles with the 1125.3 transition in {+68}Ge. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
E$E|g=1501.23 {I4} in author's Table 1 (2004St09) is a typo. Their precision is good to one decimal place 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M,MR$E1+M2 with |d=-0.15 {I5} (1981Ah03), however, this results in an M2 strength which exceeds the RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.154 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.036 {I8}, POL=+0.27 {I7} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=0.172 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.077 {I20} (1981Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$Other: 1.4 {I+2.3-0.6} (1980Wa19) 
M$A{-2}=-0.25 {I7}, A{-4}=0.04 {I12} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=-0.23 {I5}, A{-4}=0.02 {I7} (1981Ah03) 
RI$other: I|g(656|g):I|g(1600|g)=52 {I2}:48 {I2} (1980Wa19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2}, POL=+0.47 {I13} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=0.218 {I19}, A{-4}=0.083 {I22} (1981Ah03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.20 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I6} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=0.30 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I9} (1981Ah03) 
RI$other: I|g(783|g):I|g(1439|g)=63 {I4}:37 {I4} (1980Wa19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
MR$-0.26 {I15} (1981Ah03); 0.0 (1980Wa19) 
M$A{-2}=-0.29{I5}, A{-4}=0.03 {I5} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=-0.36 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.054 {I54} (1981Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=0.15 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5}, POL=+0.62 {I30} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=0.181 {I18}, A{-4}=0.040 {I22} (1981Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.12 with large error (1981Ah03); 0.0 (1980Wa19) 
M$A{-2}=-0.052 {I28}, A{-4}=-0.092 {I34} (1981Ah03); A{-2}=-0.20 {I7}, A{-4}=0.01 {I8} (1980Wa19). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
M,MR$Q in 1980Wa19; D(+Q), |d= -0.06 {I+9-2} (1981Ah03); 
$A{-2}=0.41 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I12} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=-0.164 {I25}, A{-4}=0.069 {I31} (1981Ah03) 
RI$other: I|g(1006|g):I|g(1485|g)=18 {I3}:83 {I3} (1980Wa19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in 1980Wa19 which gives mult=D+Q, 0.0<|d<3.7 (1980Wa19). 1981Ah03 give E2 for the transition multipolarity, however, this does not agree with their measured A{-2} and A{-4} values and their assignment as J|p=(5) to (4) transition. 
M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=0.0 {I5} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=-0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=0.09 {I7} (1981Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
M$A{-2}=+0.24 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I13} (1981Ah03) 
RI$other: I|g(527|g):I|g(912|g)= <10 :>90 (1980Wa19) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR$-0.15 {I5} (1981Ah03) 
M$A{-2}=-0.28 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I5}, POL=+0.16 {I4} (1980Wa19); A{-2}=-0.226 {I31}, A{-4}=0.071 {I34} (1981Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 233.7 {I1} in |e decay and 233.9 {I1} in ({+23}Na,pn|a|g) 
RI$from |e decay. Other: 100 {I17} from ({+23}Na,pn|a|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$other: 282.4 {I3} from ({+23}Na,pn|a|g) 
RI$weighted average of 38 {I8} in |e decay and 50 {I17} in ({+23}Na,pn|a|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$other: 474.5 {I6} from ({+23}Na,pn|a|g) 
RI$weighted average of 52 {I8} from {+71}Br |e decay and 58 {I13} from ({+23}Na,pn|a|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.) for pure M1, and B(E2)(W.u.) for pure E2 
M$|DJ=1, D+Q from ({+23}Na,pn|a|g); (M1+E2) from level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$from 1988Wi02 in ({+16}O,2pn|g) dataset. 
M$large mixing ratio suggests M1+E2 in contrast to E1+M2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
EKC$from ratio of delayed |g rays and x-rays, with fluorescent yield and K|a| x ray/K| x ray 
M$from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1984EbZZ. E|g=900.8 in 1989Ra13 is a misprint 
$In the Adopted dataset, this |g is assigned from 2976 level to 2066 level 
$E|g=900.8 in figure 4 of 1989Ra13 (and in level scheme figure of 1987ZhZX is a misprint) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$peak contamination and unknown detector efficiency prevent determination. 
M$from adopted J|p values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ the earlier placement of this transition from 1876 level is not confirmed in |g|g coin data of 2011Mc01. It is observed in coin with other |g rays in {+72}Se, but the placement must be different 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)(theory)=2.04 {I4} 
E$from 2011Mc01: Phys. Rev. C 83, 024310. 
$Deduced B(E2)=0.246 {I10} (compiler) using I(937, E0)/I(|g+ce)(75, E2)=0.47 {I6} 
$Compiler obtains 138 {I7} using I(937, E0)/I(|g+ce)(75, E2)=0.47 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$|W{-K}/|W{-total}(937)=0.9048 (from BrIcc code), assuming 1 keV uncertainty for 937-keV transition 
$Transition energy=936.0 {I5}from E(e)=923.3 {I5} measured by 1974Dr02: Phys. Rev. C 9, 948. 
$Measured I(937, E0)/I(|g+ce)(75|g, E2)=0.47 {I6} (2022Sm02). This value is compared to 0.41 {I8} in 2011Mc01 (Phys. Rev. C 83, 024310). 
$Deduced q{-K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.71 {I9} (2022Sm02). This value is compared to 0.6 {I4} in 2005Ki02 evaluation (At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 89, 77); and 0.47 {I6} in 2022Av02 (Nucl. Instr. Meth. A964, 163809). 2022Sm02 report a weighted averaged value of the three values as 0.54 {I7} 
$Deduced |r{+2}(E0, 937)=0.029 {I3} (2022Sm02), compared with 0.030 {I5} in 2022Ki01 evaluation (Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 123, 103930) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$The decay through 0.6-keV transition is not established. It is only implied from the lack of observation of a 26.4|g to g.s. from I|g(26.4)/I|g(166.2)<0.018 (1987He21), <0.008 (1991Se11); and no conversion electrons seen in coin with 166.2|g (1987He21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 65.0 {I1} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m), 64.9 {I1} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g), and 65.0 {I2} from {+72}Ge(|a,3n|g) 
M$from |a(K)exp in {+73}Br |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from {+73}Br |e decay and (|a,n|g) 
M$from |a(K)exp in |e decay; D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) and |g(DCO) in ({+16}O,|apn|g); D(+Q) from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 166.2 {I2} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 166.1 {I1} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g). Other: 100 {I15} from {+73}Br |e decay 
M$D from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). 
$used to determine J|p(26) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 192.6 {I2} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 192.4 {I1} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 23 {I8} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 22 {I3} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
M$M2 is impossible based on RUL since it would require an unreasonably large B(M2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 249.4 {I2} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 249.1 {I1} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 374.7 {I2} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 374.8 {I3} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 275.2 {I1} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 275.1 {I3} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 25.9 {I21} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 18 {I5} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 335.9 {I1} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 336.0 {I3} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m). Other: 100 {I5} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 400.9 {I1} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 400.6 {I4} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 57.1 {I25} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 63 {I9} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$other: -0.59 {I14} from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,3pn|g), <0.2 from |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) 
$used to determine J|p(151) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 489.8 {I1} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 489.7 {I5} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 50 {I7} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 34 {I17} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 550.6 {I2} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 550.1 {I5} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m). Other: 17 from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 615.3 {I1} from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m) and 614.9 {I6} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 
RI$from {+73}Br |e decay (3.4 m). Other: 100 {I4} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 299.3 {I1} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) and 299.3 {I2} from {+72}Ge(|a,3n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 74 {I3} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 69 {I5} from (|a,n|g), and 79 {I8} from (|a,3n|g). Others: 40 {I2} in ({+19}F,3pn|g) and 39 {I4} in ({+16}O,|apn|g) 
MR$other: -0.8 {I+4-3} from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,3pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 653.5 {I2} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) and 653.6 {I2} from {+72}Ge(|a,3n|g) 
M$Q also from |g(DCO) in ({+16}O,|apn|g), |g(|q) in ({+19}O,3pn|g) and (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 374.8 {I3} from (|a,n|g) and 373.8 {I2} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+19}F,2pn|g). Other: |?51 from (|a,n|g), 88 {I4} from ({+16}O,n2p|g) 
M$D+Q from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,3pn|g) and (|a,3n|g) 
MR$from ({+19}F,3pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 674.1 {I2} from (|a,n|g) and 673.4 {I2} from (|a,3n|g) 
RI$from ({+19}F,2pn|g). Other: 100 {I3} from (|a,n|g), 100 {I7} from ({+16}O,n2p|g) 
M$Q also from |g(DCO) in ({+16}O,|apn|g), |g(|q) in (|a,3n|g) and ({+19}F,2pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g) 
RI$weighted average of 35 {I3} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 39 {I16} from ({+16}O,|apn|g), 40 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 47 {I3} from ({+19}F,3pn|g) 
MR$other: -0.066 {I18} from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,3pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (|a,n|g) 
RI$from (|a,n|g). Others: 100 {I6} from ({+16}O,n2p|g), 100 {I10} from ({+16}O,|apn|g) 
M$Q also from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,3pn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$other: -0.038 {I23} from |g(|q) in ({+19}F,3pn|g). 
RI$weighted average of 37 {I4} from (|a,n|g) and 43 {I4} from ({+19}F,3pn|g). Other: 26 {I2} in ({+16}O,|apn|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 14.3 {I16} from {+63}Cu({+16}O,|apn|g) and 26.2 {I23} from {+70}Ge(|a,n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from 1969Ko25. Other: 25.9 {I3} (1968Mu08) 
M$from K/L=0.289 {I14} and |a(K)exp=1072 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0060 {I100}, |a(L23)exp=3650 {I120} 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$The decay through 0.6-keV transition is not established. It is only implied from the lack of observation of a 26.4|g to g.s. from I|g(26.4)/I|g(166.2)<0.018; and no conversion electrons seen in coin with 166.2|g (1987He21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$ q{+2}{-K}(E0/E2)=0.203 {I14}, X(E0/E2)=0.011 {I5}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.0231 {I22} (2005Ki02, evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
|g reported by 1972Va14 and 1968Ku09. I|g from |g|g (1972Va14) 
(635|g)(634.78|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=0.27 {I6} (1975Ca37) 
MR from |g|g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
|a(K)exp=0.036 {I10} (1972Co32), 0.069 {I11} (1984Ma35) 
(219|g)(635|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.29 {I5}, A{-4}=+1.32 {I7} (1972Co32) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
Observed in ce spectrum (1984Ma35,1983Pa10) 
TI deduced from weighted average of Ice(854K)/I|g(219|g)=0.0078 {I6} (1983Pa10) and Ice(854K)/Ice(219K)=0.26 {I4} 
X(E0/E2)=0.13 {I2} (1984Ma35). Monopole strength=0.16 {I2} (1984Ma35), 0.18 {I1} (1983Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.09 {I11} 
I|g(634|g)/I|g(1269|g)=100 {I5}/15 {I1} (1990Co21) is in disagreement with values from 1979Pi05 and 1989Ad01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.12 {I9} 
|a(K)exp=0.00096 {I2} (1971WyZX) 
A{-2}=+0.32, A{-4}=-0.08 in (|a,2n|g) (1970Li11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.02 {I11} 
|a(K)exp=0.00061 {I2} (1971WyZX) 
A{-2}=+0.33, A{-4}=-0.09 in (|a,2n|g) (1970Li11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
R(DCO)=1.17 {I9} 
|a(K)exp=0.00050 {I3} (1971WyZX) 
A{-2}=+0.34, A{-4}=-0.09 in (|a,2n|g) (1970Li11) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.32 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I2} 
(493|g)(987|g)(|q): ratio=0.56 {I13} 
(493|g)(1715|g)(|q): ratio=0.40 {I6} (1977PiZR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ 4126.0 in table I of 2012Mc01 is a misprint as per e-mail reply of Feb 19, 2013 from E.A. McCutchan 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$q{+2}(E0/E2)=0.39 {I22}, |r{+2}(E0)=210|*10{+-3} {I130}. 
$|a{-K}=1.6|*10{+-3} {I2}. This value was extracted by taking into account the contribution from 635|g from first 2{++}|)0{++} transition. 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=1.12 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from weighted average of 0.336 {I27} (1984To11), 0.35 {I7} (1974Su03), 0.24 {I5} (1991Sa22), 0.27 {I6} (1974Ag05). Other: <0.25 (1995BeZS) from ce data in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from (p,n|g). 
CC$for E|g=20.9 {I4}, and mult=M1+E2, |d<0.055 from B(E2)(W.u.)<300 
M,MR$|a(exp)=34 {I13} from I(|g+ce)(20.9)/I|g(133)=3.8 {I4} (1992Jo04) gives M1+E2, |d=0.35 {I10}; but RUL=300 for E2 gives |d<0.055, which is adopted here. Other I(|g+ce)(20.9)/I|g(133)=2.3 (1976Sa07), 0.82 (1975Ze02) in (|a,n|g) give lower values of |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from weighted average of 0.26 {I5} (n,|g) and 0.31 {I6} (p,n|g). Others: -0.19 {I19} (|a,n|g), -0.11 {I9} (p,n|g), <0.15 (1995BeZS) from ce data in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g). Other: -0.07 {I8} from ce in (p,n|g), <0.55 (1995BeZS) from ce data in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from (p,n|g). Others: 0.32 {I17} from ce data in (n,|g), 2.0 {I5} in (p,n|g), 0.70 {I35} (1995BeZS) from ce data in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 2.3 {I7} ({+75}Br |e decay (96.7 min)), 2.45 {I18} ({+75}As(p,n|g),(p,n)). From {+75}Se(n,|g) I|g=41 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$+0.09 {I2} for J(1047)=7/2, >+23 for J(1047)=5/2 in (p,n|g); latter is not possible from RUL for M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 21 {I9} ({+75}Br |e decay (96.7 min)), 14.5 {I8} ({+74}Se(n,|g) E=thermal:placed |g). In {+75}As(p,n|g) I|g=46 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 65 {I9} ({+75}Br |e decay (96.7 min)), 35 {I3} ({+74}Se(n,|g) E=thermal:placed |g). In {+75}As(p,n|g) I|g=100 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$+0.11 {I1} or +1.23 {I11} in (p,n|g), but the latter value is not allowed by RUL for M2. The value of |d is further restricted to <0.012 from RUL=1 for M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$-0.09 {I2} or -2.50 {I15} in (p,n|g), but the latter value is not allowed by RUL for M2. The value of |d is further restricted to <0.014 from RUL=1 for M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$-1.5 {I3} is inconsistent with RUL=300, which allows |d<0.3. or there is problem with level lifetime 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 27 {I3} ({+74}Se(n,|g) E=thermal:placed |g), 29.4 {I11} ({+75}As(p,n|g),(p,n)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 18.7 {I20} ({+74}Se(n,|g) E=thermal:placed |g), 8.6 {I3} ({+75}As(p,n|g),(p,n)). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2,E3]
decay_comment:
E$ high implied multipolarity suggests that this |g may deexcite a level different from the L=2 level in (d,p) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.0028 {I4}, measured relative to |a(K)exp for 279.2|g in {+203}Hg (1972Co06); |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I11}, |a(L)exp=0.0003 {I1} (1995BeZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Ro12, where it was incorrectly assigned to decay of {+75}Kr. A 6.2 {i4} |g ray has been seen in {+75}As(p,n) reaction 
RI EXPECTED TO BE HIGHLY CONVERTED. CC=34.0 3 IF M1. 
TI$from intensity balance at the 293 level. Value given is an upper limit corresponding to the assumption of no direct |e+|b{++} feeding to the 293 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d(E2/M1)<0.6 from |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I7} (1995BeZS); |a(K)exp marginally overlaps E1. |DJ|p requires E1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$M1(+E2), |d<0.55 from |a(K)exp=0.0057 {I18} (1995BeZS) 
E$shown incorrectly from 579 level by 1972Co06 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.40 {I2} (1976Sa07) 
$A{-2}=-0.23 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I14} (1975Ze02) 
MR$|g(|q) gives -0.25 {I13} or -2.1 {I4}. Data in (n,|g) and (p,n|g) agree with the first value only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.05 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1976Sa07) 
$ A2=-0.02 2, A4=+0.01 2 (1975Ze02) 
$ A2=+0.02 4, A4=0.00 7 (1975Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.41 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I4} (1976Sa07) 
$A{-2}=-0.31 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I7} (1975Ze02) 
MR$|g(|q) gives -0.19 {I10} or -1.6 {I2}. Data in (n,|g) and (p,n|g) agree with the first value only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ A2=+0.22 4 (1976Sa07) 
$A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} (1975Ze02) 
$ A2=+0.11 7, A4=-0.02 11 (1975Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.08 {I3} (1976Sa07) 
MR$|g(|q) gives +0.12 {I8} or -2.5 {I6}. Data in (p,n|g) agree with the first value only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ A2=-0.59 1 (1976Sa07) 
$A{-2}=-0.56 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I5} (1975Ze02) 
$ A2=-0.47 7, A4=-0.08 10 (1975Ze02) 
MR$-1.5<|d<-0.16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=+0.39 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.13 {I4} (1976Sa07) 
$ A2=+0.47 7, A4=+0.08 9 (1975Ze02) 
$ A2=+0.5 3, A4=-0.06 31 (1975Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.20 {I6} (1976Sa07) 
MR$|g(|q) gives +0.3 {I3} or <2.9. Data in (p,n|g) agree with the first value only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |g(|q) for J=13/2+ mult=Q, RUL rules out M2 
$A{-2}=+0.54 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.41 {I7} (1976Sa07) 
$ A2=+0.47 3, A4=+0.03 3 (1975Ze02) 
$ A2=+0.32 12, A4=-0.06 11 (1975Ze02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=286.62 3, |s=0.280 b 6 (2007ChZX) 
|a(K)exp=0.0034 {I4}, |a(L1)exp=0.00033 {I4}, |a(M)exp=5.7|*10{+-5} {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of 0.24 {I5} (from |g(|q) (1991Sa22)), 0.27 {I6} (from |a(K)exp=0.092 {I10} (1974Ag05)), 0.35 {I6} (from |a(K)exp=0.109 {I14} (1974Su03)) 
|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp=0.0138 {I8} (1974Su03) 
A{-2}=-0.360 {I22}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$ 132.2 (1991Sa22) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.27 {I3} (1974Ag05); |a(K)exp=0.31 {I4}, |a(L)exp + |a(M)exp=0.042 {I5} (1974Su03) 
A{-2}=+0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.035 {I4}, |d<0.15 (1974Ag05) and |a(K)exp=0.050 {I5}, |d=0.30 {I7} (1974Su03). |a(L)exp + |a(M)exp=0.0065 {I6} (1974Su03) 
RI$57.6 {I23} (1974Su03), 59 (1974Ag05) 
A{-2}=-0.37 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$35.3 {I4} (1974Su03), 35 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3} (1974Su03), 0.0011 {I1} (1974Ag05) 
A{-2}=-0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$83.2 {I5} (1974Su03), 84 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0059 {I4} (1974Ag05), |d=0.21 {I+10-21} and |a(K)exp=0.0092 {I10} |d=0.77 {I20} (1974Su03) 
|d=-0.07 {I8} or -4.5 {I9} (1991Sa22), but the latter value is not supported by |a(K)exp 
|a(L)exp + |a(M)exp=0.0011 {I3} (1974Su03) 
A{-2}=-0.07 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$11.4 {I5} (1974Su03), 11 (1974Ag05) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I18} (1974Ag05). Other: |a(K)exp=0.0128 {I20} (1974Su03) |d>1.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$71.6 {I9} (1974Su03), 70 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I2} (1974Ag05), |d<0.3 
A{-2}=+0.011 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.012 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$22.2 {I8} (1974Su03), 22 (1974Ag05) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.07 {I6} or +1.5 {I3} 
A{-2}=+0.091 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$15.6 {I9} (1974Su03), 10 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0074 {I22} (1974Su03), |d|?0 
MR$|d=+0.07 {I6} or +2.0 {I5} from |g(|q) (1991Sa22). |d=2.0 is not supported by |a(K)exp 
A{-2}=+0.091 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.004 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1991Sa22 and 1974Ag05, |g not reported by 1974Su03 
RI$from Adopted Gammas. I|g=0.04 (1991Sa22), 6 (1974Ag05) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0053 {I20} (1974Ag05) gives M1,E2, but |DJ|p requires E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$78.4 {I10} (1974Su03), 78 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I5} (1974Ag05) (|d<0.35), 0.0037 {I4} (1974Su03) (|d=0.55 18) 
A{-2}=-0.241 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$64.3 {I10} (1974Su03), 69 (1974Ag05) 
MR$other: 0.45 {I22} from |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I8} (1974Su03) 
A{-2}=+0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$17.8 {I10} (1974Su03), 23 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I5} (1974Ag05), 0.0046 {I12} (1974Su03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$26.9 {I5} (1974Su03), 22 (1974Ag05) 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I13} (1974Ag05), |d<0.7 
A{-2}=+0.031 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$35.0 {I10} (1974Su03), 38 (1974Ag05) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.08 {I2} or +3.49 {I9} 
A{-2}=-0.034 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.002 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Su03 for a doublet. I|g=1.7 (1991Sa22) disagrees 
E$ 678.0 (1974Ag05), 676.8 1 (1974Su03) FOR A DOUBLET 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Su03. I|g=74.8 {I26} (1991Sa22) 
A{-2}=-0.32 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} 
MR$ SIGN IS POSITIVE IN 1991Sa22, BUT A2 AND A4 INDICATE NEGATIVE SIGN 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$17.9 {I6} (1974Su03), 16 (1974Ag05) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.016 {I4} (1974Su03), |d=0.34 {I+20-34} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$74.6 {I5} (1974Su03), 77 (1974Ag05) 
MR$|d=+1.4 {I3} for J=7/2 and |d=+0.12 {I2} for J=9/2 (1991Sa22). But the most probable J=3/2 
A{-2}=+0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$45.3 {I8} (1974Su03), 51 (1974Ag05) 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I4} (1974Ag05). Other: 0.6 {I+16-6} from |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I10} (1974Su03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$676.8 {I1} (1974Su03) for a doublet, 676.1 {I4} (1974Ag05) 
RI$47.8 {I30} (1974Su03) for a doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$44.2 {I27} (1974Su03) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.22 {I7} or +2.36 {I11} for J=7/2 
A{-2}=-0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$761.2 {I4} (1974Ag05) from a 1189 level, 760.4 {I5} (1974Su03) 
RI$35.8 {I28} (1974Su03). But no such transition reported in (n,|g) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.78 {I5} or +2.74 {I10} for J=5/2 
A{-2}=+0.140 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1048.7 {I4} (1974Ag05) from a 1161 level, 1049.7 {I3} (1974Su03) 
RI$20.0 {I28} (1974Su03) for 1049.7|g. But no such transition in (n,|g) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.09 {I2} for J=7/2 and >+23 for J=5/2 
A{-2}=-0.047 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.006 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
E$975.0 {I2} (1974Su03) from 1561 level 
|d(Q/D)=+0.06 {I7} or +0.96 {I10} 
A{-2}=+0.161 {I23}, A{-4}=+0.010 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$32.6 {I23} (1974Su03) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.11 {I1} or +1.23 {I11} 
A{-2}=-0.101 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$50.9 {I19} (1974Su03) 
|d(Q/D)=-0.09 {I2} or -2.50 {I15} 
A{-2}=-0.118 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Ag05. E|g=952.4 {I2} (1974Su03) for a doublet 
RI$from 1974Su03. I|g=0.1 (1991Sa22), 60 (1974Ag05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1974Su03. I|g=100 (1991Sa22), 40 (1974Ag05) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.28 {I7} or +0.73 {I11} for J=5/2 and |d=+4.01 {I11} for J=7/2 
A{-2}=+0.151 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.010 {I22} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$630.9 (1991Sa22) 
RI$60 {I5} (1974Su03), 83 (1974Ag05) 
|d(Q/D)>+10 for J=5/2 and +0.07 {I3} for J=7/2 
A{-2}=-0.049 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$40 {I10} (1974Su03), 17 (1974Ag05) 
|d(Q/D)=-0.27 {I7} or -1.88 {I11} for J=7/2 
A{-2}=-0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$58 {I4} (1974Su03) 
|d(Q/D)=-0.74 {I7} or -6.04 {I22} for J=5/2 and |d=+0.05 {I5} for J=7/2 
A{-2}=-0.068 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
RI$25 {I5} (1974Su03) 
|d(Q/D)=-0.21 {I3} or -2.48 {I11} for J=7/2 
A{-2}=-0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$869.2 {I5} (1974Su03) for a doublet 
|d(Q/D)=-0.20 {I2} or -1.88 {I9} 
A{-2}=-0.166 {I23}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$1491.6 (1991Sa22) 
|d(Q/D)=-0.29 {I4} or -1.60 {I14} for 7/2 
SIGN(MR) IS GIVEN AS POSITIVE FOR MR=0.29. BUT A2 AND A4 VALUES INDICATE NEGATIVE SIGN 
A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (D+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$from 1991Sa22. E|g=1224.4 {I5} (1974Su03) 
|d(Q/D)=+0.04 {I4} or +1.60 {I10} 
A{-2}=+0.118 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
$q{-|K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.133 {I15}, X(E0/E2)=0.0246 {I31}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.035 {I+14-13} (2022Ki03 evaluation) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.023 {I4} (1986Gi12); |r(E0)=0.17 {I4} (1986Gi12), 0.19 {I4} (1983Pa10) from ce data in {+76}Br |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Others: +6 {I1} (|g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e); +4.7 {I+11-20} (|a,2n|g). E0 from |a(K)exp=0.00167 {I15} (1970Dz09) in {+76}Br |e decay 
$X(E0/E2)|<0.14; |r(E0)|<0.41 (1986Gi12) 
$q{-|K}{+2}(E0/E2)=0.25 {I14}, X(E0/E2)=0.11 {I6}, |r{+2}(E0)=0.140 {I80}, %E0=19 (2022Ki03 evaluation) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0044 {I21} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=46 {I22} if E2 
MR$+1.8 {I+10-12} or +0.8 {I+20-3} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of available values 
MR$from {+76}Br |e decay. Others: +2.1 {I9}, +0.75 {I44} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g); +0.01 to +0.73, >+2.5 or <-6.7 from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} decay. Others: +1.8 {I12} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), +0.57 to +3.55 from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}, +1.9 {I2} from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$NRM weighted average. High value of 31 from (n,n'|g) is not used 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} decay. Other: -0.13 {I34} or >+1.37 from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Parity is from the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$weighted average from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Others: -0.19 {I5} from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e, -0.52 {I+9-7} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Others: 339.62 {I10} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), 339.60 {I10} from (n,n'|g), and 338.0 {I15} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 21 {I5} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), 16.1 {I16} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 22.4 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 54.0 {I20} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 45 {I4} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), 26.8 {I29} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 51.3 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 796.44 {I26} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), 796.08 {I6} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 796.2 {I3} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14h). Other: 18.7 {I32} from (n,|g) E=thermal questionable 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 911.11 {I13} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 911.03 {I10} from (n,n'|g). Other: 910.7 {I8} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 4.73 {I14} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 5.3 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1005.06 {I22} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 1004.98 {I16} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 3.4 {I4} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 6.1 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1568.22 {I7} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 1568.25 {I10} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), 1568.02 {I7} from (n,|g) E=thermal, and 1568.07 {I12} from (n,n'|g). Other: 1568.1 {I5} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Others: 100.0 {I13} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 100 {I6} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), and 100 {I13} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2127.0 {I1} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 2127.69 {I20} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), and 2127.21 {I8} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 18.0 {I13} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 16.7 {I14} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), and 18.4 {I4} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) E=thermal. Other: 382.92 {I44} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 
RI$from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 954.7 {I2} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 954.35 {I28} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), 954.47 {I9} from (n,n'|g), and 953.9 {I10} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 13.3 {I19} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 16.3 {I8} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), and 15.6 {I7} from (n,n'|g). Other: 330 {I120} in (n,|g) E=thermal indicates contamination. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1611.5 {I3} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, 1611.71 {I12} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h), and 1611.63 {I8} from (n,n'|g). Other: 1611.7 {I5} from (p,p'|g) 
RI$(n,n'|g). Others: 100 {I4} from {+76}As |b{+-} decay, {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Other: +0.08 {I16} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Parity is from the Adopted Levels. 
$B(M2)(W.u.)=2.7 {I+47-23} exceeds RUL=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Others: -0.27 {I13} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g), +0.11 {I10} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Parity is the Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Other: +0.00 {I8} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. Parity is from the Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 800.6 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) and 800.40 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 100 {I7} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 1158.4 {I5} from (|a,2n|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 50.0 {I33} from (|a,2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$weighted average of +0.188 {I52} from {+76}Br |e decay and +0.24 {I5} from (n,n'|g). Others: >+3.0 or <-0.10 from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-3 {I+18-3} or -1 {I+15-1} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=6.0|*10{+-4} {I17} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.18 {I33} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1388.13 {I27} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 1387.86 {I6} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$weighted average of 28.6 {I14} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 30.7 {I9} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0017 {I+7-6} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.17 {I+46-40} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). Other: 2045.49 {I70} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 100 {I4} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 
M,MR$D+Q from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h); E1+M2 ruled out by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+8 {I+21-5} or +0.15 {I11} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0066 {I11} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=10.3 {I17} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e decay. Others: +0.08 {I7} from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}, +0.4 {I+6-3} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e decay. Others: +0.01 {I3}, +0.13 {I9} from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}, -0.02 {I10} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e decay. Others: +0.02 {I6} from |g|g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}, 0.00 {I8} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e decay. Others: +0.05 {I2} from |g|g(|q), -0.11 {I12} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
E$from {+76}As decay. Value of 2111.27 {I8} from {+76}Br decay fits poorly. Weighted average (NRM) of all available values is 2111.23 {I12} 
MR$from |g|g(|q) in {+76}Br |e decay. Others: -0.09 {I2} from |g|g(|q), -0.02 {I16} from |g(|q) in {+76}As |b{+-}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$|g from (|a,2n|g) only 
$|d(M2/E1)=+0.35 {I15} gives B(M2)(W.u.)=210 {I180}. RUL|<1 for M2 gives |d<0.01. Parity from the Adopted Levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1(+M2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$|?0.4 for |DJ=0 from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) is too high. From RUL(M2)=1, |d<0.1 
$B(M2)(W.u.)<1.6 upper limit exceeds RUL=1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.38 {I+14-12} or +1.1 {I+3-8} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=1.76|*10{+-5} {I+15-13} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.0086 {I7} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.52 {I9} or -12 {I+52-6} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=1.25|*10{+-5} {I10} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.00314 {I+25-22} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+5 {I+58-2} or -0.21 {I19} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0127 {I12} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=5.3 {I5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$|g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) consistent with |DJ=0 or 2; |d(Q/D)=+0.6 {I3} from |g(|q) in (|a,2n|g) (1984Zo01) would require a B(E2)(W.u.)=2.0|*10{+4} {I+17-15} exceeding RUL=300; POL from (|a,2n|g) seems consistent with E1 but it would require a B(E1)(W.u.)=0.048 {I15-34} exceeding RUL=0.01 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=2.0 {I+10-9} upper bound exceeds RUL=3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.04 {I9} or -7 {I+14-3} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0027 {I5} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.91 {I37} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+1.93 {I+28-34} or -0.14 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0392 {I+36-32} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=23.3 {I+22-19} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$-0.02 {I9} or -4.6 {I+33-14} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00302 {I+33-29} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=1.04 {I+11-10} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$+0.26 {I10} or +14 {I+50-8} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=9.8|*10{+-4} {I24} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.189 {I+48-46} if E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$+3.2 {I+7-4} or -0.10 {I5} from (n,n'|g) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.098 {I+15-11} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=18.6 {I+28-21} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2737.07 {I24} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 2736.21 {I10} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from (n,n'|g). Other: 100 {I6} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 3296.14 {I20} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 3295.07 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 45.9 {I17} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 39.2 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1509.23 {I16} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 1507.52 {I14} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 2174.66 {I30} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 2173.06 {I18} from (n,n'|g) 
RI$from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$If E2, B(E2)(W.u.)=5.5|*10{+3} {I+7-6} exceeds RUL=300; if E1, B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0248 {I28} exceeds RUL=0.01; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3603.99 {I8} from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) and 3604.3 {I3} from (|g,|g') 
RI$from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from {+76}Br |e+|b{++} decay (16.14 h) 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0165 {I+21-17} if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)=4.3 {I+6-5} if E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Previous placement from 2170 level revised by 2019Mu04 based on its threshold at 3.0 MeV neutron energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.136 {I4}; |b{-42}=0.278 (1974Ba80) 
$(772|g+810|g)({+16}O)(|q): A{-2}=+0.43 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.21 {I12} (1964By02). These coefficients are consistent with J|p=4+ 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.002 {I1} (1974Ba80 assume pure E2). Using |d=-0.49 {I5} (from Adopted Gammas), evaluators deduce B(E2)=0.0004 {I2} 
$M1 matrix element=-0.14 {I2} (1995Ka29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0039 {I+6-24} (1974Ba80). See comment for 772|g for |g(|q). Adopted T{-1/2}=1.8 ps {I4} gives B(E2)=0.09 {I2} 
$|b{-42}=0.050 (1974Ba80) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.002 keV (1998De26) 
RI$measured I|g/100 decays=40.67 {I29} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method) 
$559|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.472 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.75 {I6} (1976Ba15) 
RI$1957Ma16 give absolute intensity as 0.446 per decay, which is most likely the value for all |g rays near 559, i.e. 559, 563, 571 and 575. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.002 keV (1998De26) 
RI$measured I|g/100 decays=1.108 {I43} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method) 
$(563|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=1.11 {I10} (1989Za03) 
$(563|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.26 {I9}, A{-4}=1.15 {I15} (1980Ka36); A{-2}=+0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.96 {I4} (1977CoZK); A{-2}=+0.25 {I5}, A{-4}=1.09 {I9} (1973Na04) 
$563|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.046 {I54} (1976Ba15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26) 
RI$measured I|g/100 decays=5.550 {I31} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method) 
$(657|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.225 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.31 {I3} (1989Za03) 
$(657|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I1} (1980Ka36); A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.29 {I3} (1977CoZK); A{-2}=-0.18 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.30 {I2} (1973Na04) 
$657|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.182 {I16} (1987Su05); A{-2}=-0.111 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.40 {I26} (1976Ba15) 
MR$+5.2 {I2} (1976Ba15), +4.15 {I20} (1987Su05), +5.3 {I5} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26) 
RI$measured I|g/100 decays=3.012 {I88} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method) 
$(1213|g+1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.311 {I14}, A{-4}=-1.06 {I33} (1976Ba15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26) 
$(772|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.105 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1989Za03) 
$(772G)(559G)(|q): A2=0.00 6, A4=+0.03 9 (1977CoZK) 
$|d(M3/E2)<+0.02 (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26) 
$473|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I44} (1987Su05) 
MR$values from this dataset: +0.01 to +0.73, >+2.5 or <-6.7 (1987Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.005 keV (1998De26) 
$1130|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.73 {I15} (1987Su05) 
MR$from (1130|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.240 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1989Za03) 
$(1130G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.26 6, A4=+0.04 8 (1980Ka36); A2=-0.1 1, A4=+0.09 20 (1977CoZK); A2=-0.1 1, A4=+0.1 1 (1973Na04) 
MR$+0.57 to +3.55 (1987Su05), +1.08 {I10} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26) 
$(572|g)(1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.145 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.05 {I3} (1989Za03) 
$(572|g)(657|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.04 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.1 {I1} (1977CoZK) 
$572|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.25 {I40} (1987Su05) 
MR$>+1.37 or -0.13 {I34} (1987Su05), +0.13 {I12} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26) 
$665|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.65 {I10} (1987Su05) 
$(665|g)[563|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.013 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.046 {I10} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26) 
RI$measured I|g/100 decays=1.037 {I31} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method) 
MR$weighted average of results from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) 
$(1229|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.471 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.097 {I11} (1989Za03) 
$(1229G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.46 1, A4=+0.10 1 (1980Ka36); A2=+0.41 3, A4=+0.08 5 (1977CoZK); A2=+0.46 2, A4=+0.15 3 (1973Na04) 
$1229|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.21 {I5} (1987Su05), 0.17 {I4} (1976Ba15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$placement from 1998De26; earlier placement from 2363 level was rejected based on |g|g-coin data 
$575|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I15} (for 2+ to 2+); 0.20 {I18} (for 3+ to 2+) (1987Su05) 
$(575|g)(1228|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.35 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I5} (1989Za03) 
MR$for 2+ to 2+; |d=-0.48 {I15}, >+10 or <-6. For 3+ to 2+; |d=+0.07 {I10} or -3.7 to -13.8 (1987Su05). |d=-1.18 {I35} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26) 
$740|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.49 {I13} (1987Su05), -0.20 {I12} (1976Ba15) 
$(740|g)[1130|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.143 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1989Za03) 
MR$from 1989Za03. Other: +0.08 {I16} (1987Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26) 
RI$measured I|g/100 decays=1.296 {I65} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method) 
$1213|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I17} (1987Su05) 
$(1213|g)(657|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.011 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I13} (1989Za03) 
$(1213G)(657G)(|q): A2=+0.01 4, A4=+0.05 5 (1977CoZK) 
$(1213|g)(1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.058 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.13 {I13} (1989Za03) 
$(1213G)(1216G)(|q): A2=+0.07 5, A4=-0.1 1 (1977CoZK) 
$(1213|g)[657|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.051 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.081 {I12} (1989Za03) 
MR$+0.11 {I10} (1987Su05), +0.025 {I20} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$1870|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.34 {I15} (1987Su05) 
$(1870|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.05 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1989Za03) 
MR$values from this dataset: +0.00 {I8} (1987Su05), +0.17 {I3} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.009 keV (1998De26) 
$727|g(|q): A{-2}=-1.4 {I6} (1987Su05) 
MR$>+3.0 or <-0.10 (1987Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26) 
$868|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.42 {I26} (1987Su05) 
$(868|g)(1228|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.133 {I23}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1989Za03) 
$(868|g)[1228|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.095 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.016 {I27} (1989Za03) 
MR$values from this dataset: +0.4 {I+6-3} (1987Su05), +0.08 {I7} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26) 
$1439|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.06 {I10} (1987Su05) 
$(1439|g)(1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1989Za03) 
$(1439G)(1216G)(|q): A2=-0.38 8, A4=+0.07 11 (1980Ka36) 
$(1439|g)[657|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.028 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1989Za03) 
MR$values from this dataset: -0.02 {I10} (1987Su05), +0.01 {I3} (1989Za03), +0.13 {I9} (1980Ka36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.01 keV (1998De26) 
$2096|g(|q): A{-2}=+0.07 {I8} (1987Su05), 0.09 {I8} (1976Ba15) 
$(2096|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.258 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.034 {I19} (1989Za03) 
$(2096G)(559G)(|q): A2=-0.20 1, A4=-0.04 1 (1980Ka36); A2=-0.21 5, A4=-0.17 8 (1977CoZK) 
MR$0.00 {I8} (1987Su05), +0.02 {I6} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26) 
$882|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.5 {I4} (1987Su05) 
$(882|g)(1228|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.00 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} (1989Za03) 
$(882|g)[1228|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.010 {I25}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4} (1989Za03) 
MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.26 {i15} from 1989Za03. Other: <+5.3 or >-0.24 (1987Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.008 keV (1998De26) 
$981|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.3 {I7} (1987Su05) 
MR$>+16.4 or <+0.24 (1987Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26) 
$1454|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I15} (1987Su05) 
$(1454|g)(1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.22 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7} (1989Za03) 
$(1454|g)[657|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1989Za03) 
MR$values from this dataset: -0.11 {I12} (1987Su05), +0.05 {I2} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
$2111|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.39 {I20} (1987Su05), -0.29 {I9} (1976Ba15) 
$(2111|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.320 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.047 {I26} (1989Za03) 
$(2111G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.26 1, A4=+0.067 13 (1980Ka36); A2=+0.22 12, A4=+0.04 2 (1977CoZK) 
MR$values from this dataset: -0.02 {I16} (1987Su05), -0.09 {I2} (1989Za03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26) 
E$level-energy difference=2669.88 
RI$0.0007 {i1} in 1998De26, 0.003 {I1} (1982We14), 0.0006 {I1} (1980Ka36), 0.006 {I1} (1972Ar03). Large discrepancy in I|g may be due to contribution from coincidental summing of 2110|g and 559|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$others: 3.90 {I20} in 1974Na17, 12.0 {I15} in 1974HeYW (probably an impurity), 5.6 {I3} in 1975VyZX and 4.8 {I8} in 2004Sh17 
$(563|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.269, A{-4}=+0.815 (2018MoZZ) 
$(563|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.207 {I11}, A{-4}=+0.90 {I5} (1982MuZV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E,TI$from 1986Gi12. I(|g+ce) is per 100 decays of {+76}Br 
$ce(K)(1122)/ce(K)(563|g)=0.12 {I2} (1986Gi12); ce(K)(1122)/Ig(563)= 0.00026 {I4}4 (1983Pa10) 
$X(E0/E2)=0.023 {I4} (1986Gi12); |r(E0)=0.17 {I4} (1986Gi12), 0.19 {I4} (1983Pa10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1(+E0)
decay_comment:
$(657|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.161, A{-4}=+0.242; |d=+7.5 {I+987-42} (2018MoZZ) 
$(657|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.186 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.130 {I16} (1982MuZV). These values give |d=+6 {I1} or +0.65 {I5} 
$ce(K)(E0/E2)|<0.058 (1986Gi12) 
$X(E0/E2)|<0.14, |r(E0)|<0.41 (1986Gi12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(1130|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.147, A{-4}=-0.046; |d=+1.89 {I+19-18} (2018MoZZ) 
$(1130|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.237 {I29}, A{-4}=+0.065 (1982MuZV). Deduced |d=+0.45 to +1.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$(1229|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.366, A{-4}=+0.047; |d=-0.186 {I+46-52} (2018MoZZ) 
$(1229|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.230 {I22}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I5} (1982MuZV). Deduced |d=-2.5 {I2} or +0.02 {I2}, which disagrees with |d value from {+76}As |b{+-}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$(1955|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.375, A{-4}=+0.053 
M$adopted value from |d=-0.205 {I+53-60} (2018MoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D(+Q)
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.001 in 2018MoZZ increased to 0.010 by evaluators 
$(868|g)(1787|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.265, A{-4}=+0.033; |d=+0.013 {I20} (2018MoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2391.42 {I20} (2018MoZZ) and 2391.29 {I6} (1974Na17). 
$(2391|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.184, A{-4}=-0.008; |d=-0.058 {I+4-5} (2018MoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1853.45 {I11} (2018MoZZ), 1853.68 {I5} (1974Na17) 
$(1854|g)(1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.224, A{-4}=+0.003; |d=+0.035 {I4} (2018MoZZ) 
$(1854|g)[657|g](559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.086 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I4} (1982MuZV) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2510.92 {I22} (2018MoZZ), 2510.85 {I8} (1974Na17) 
$(2510|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.198, A{-4}=+0.002; |d=+0.069 {I6} (2018MoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2135.55 {I20} (2018MoZZ), 2135.64 {I8} (1974Na17) 
$(2135|g)(1216|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.203, A{-4}=-0.004; |d=-0.042 {I10} (2018MoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 2792.68 {I22} (2018MoZZ), 2792.72 {I6} (1974Na17) 
$(2792|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.181, A{-4}=+0.010; |d=-0.060 {I19} (2018MoZZ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 3604.00 {I20} (2018MoZZ), 3603.99 {I8} (1974Na17) 
E$poor fit, level energy difference=3604.37 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from 1984Zo01. I|g=2.6 {I2} (1982Ma45) gives a branching ratio which disagrees with that in the Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$This |g placed from a 3790 level by 1980We07 but placement from 2859 level supported by 1984Zo01 and 1982Ma45. Instead, a 1523.5|g is placed from a 3787 level by 1984Zo01 
$|d|?+0.4 (1984Zo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Note: signs of A{-2} and A{-4} in 1980We07 are opposite to those in 1982Ma45 and 1984Zo01. 
$|d=-11 to +0.07 (1984Zo01) 
E$961.5 {I6} (1980We07), 962.1 (1984Zo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(487|g)/I|g(266|g)=100/55 (1984Zo01) disagrees with 100/118 from 1982Ma45 
$|d=+0.25 {I5} (1984Zo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
E$from level energy with recoil correction removed. E|g=5298.4 {I2} is listed by 2013Go19, same as for 5298.6 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from B(E2) and T{-1/2}. Sign(|d) from |d=+0.18 {I3} from |g(|q) in Coul. ex.; others: +0.13 {I4} (from {+77}Br |e decay, 1974Br10), 0.25 {I7} (from (n,|g), 1985To10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
MR$|g|g(|q) in {+77}Br |e decay gives |d=+0.09 {I5} for E1+M2. The ce data in (n,|g) give |d=0.17 {I3}; however, |d<0.010 is expected from RUL 
RI$value from (|a,3n|g) is not included in averaging since I|g(88)/I|g(250)=1.08 {I4} in (|a,3n|g) is higher by a factor of |?2 as compared to values from several different studies 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
MR$ce data in (n,|g) gives |d=0.11 {I3} for E1+M2; however, from RUL, this |d would require T{-1/2}(301 level)>1 |ms 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in {+74}Ge(|a,n|g). Others: +0.07 {I3} (1991Ko45) 0.12 {I12} (1985To10), 0.05 {I3} (1962Ro03), 0.00 {I9} (1974Br10) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$from (n,|g). I|g(569|g)/I|g(368|g)=0.85 {I14} in (|a,3n|g), 0.50 {I4} in (|a,n|g) 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=800 {I+200-300} is much larger than RUL=300. Either the branching or T{-1/2}(level) is incorrect 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement in (n,|g) is considered unlikely (by evaluator) since deduced B(M3)(W.u.) is much greater than allowed by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$intensity division is based on results from (|a,n|g) for placement of 620.8|g from 796 level 
E$level-energy difference=618.83; placement questioned by the evaluator, based on energy mismatch by 2 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.68 {I10} (1969Sa05), 0.79 {I6} (1962We08), K/L=5.9 (1963Ku06) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$|g(|q) for doubly placed |g 
RI$total I|g=9.32 {I11}. Intensity is divided on the basis of (|a,3n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$based on (|a,3n|g) results, this |g is now doubly placed. Out of total I|g=3.37 {I12}, 0.8 {I4} is assigned from 2091 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total I|g=3.36 {I14}. Intensity is divided on the basis of (|a,3n|g) results where this transition is from 978 level only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(88|g)/I|g(250|g)=1.08 {I4} (1997Jo02) is high by a factor of |?2 as compared to values from several other studies. Adopted ratio=0.475 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M,MR$the |a(K), |a(L1) and |a(L23) data all suggest an M2 admixture, and are consistent with |d=0.17 {I3}; however, from RUL, one expect |d<0.010. The ce data are also not consistent with pure E1 including penetration effects 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E|g=888.84 {I4}, I|g=0.180 {I5} identified in PGAA database (2007ChZX) cannot correspond to 888.764|g since the relative intensity of the former |g is too high by a factor of |?14. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M3]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement is considered unlikely (by evaluator) since deduced B(M3)(W.u.) is much greater than allowed by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M4]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Placement in (n,|g) is considered unlikely (by evaluator) since deduced B(M4)(W.u.) is much greater than allowed by RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from level energy difference 
RI$expected to be highly converted. |a=4.12 if M1. 
TI$estimated by the evaluator from intensity balance for the 175 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=0.0026 {I7} (1975DzZV) 
$ECC=0.0036 9 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ECC=0.0087 22 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 
$(282|g)(239|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.175 {I7}, A{-4}=0.03 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ECC=0.0056 14 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 
MR$|g|g(|q) gives -0.17 {I3} or +2.7 {I2}, but ce data in (n,|g) agrees with the small value only 
$(297|g)(282|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.136 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I3} 
$(297|g)(521|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.145 {I7}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2} 
$(297|g)(282|g)(239|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.012 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(exp)=0.00044 {I15} (1975DzZV) 
$ECC=0.0006 2 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$from ce data in (n,|g) 
$(304|g)(521|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.185 {I22}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5} 
$|g(|q): 1992Gr20 
$|d=-0.09 {I5} or +8 {I+2-3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ECC=0.0028 10 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 
MR$from |g|g(|q) for J|p(824 level)=5/2 
$(385|g)(440|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.098 {I16}, A{-4}=0.08 {I4} 
$(385|g)(200|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=0.06 {I6} 
$(385|g)(200|g)(239|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=0.08 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |g|g(|q) for J|p(824 level)=5/2 
$(575|g)(250|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.04 {I3}, A{-4}=0.06 {I7} 
$|g(|q): 1992Gr20 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ECC=0.0015 5 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 
$(485|g)(521|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.012 {I11}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ECC=0.0008 2 in 1975DzZV corrected by a multiplicative factor of 0.7336 
$(755|g)(250|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.53 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I8} 
$(755|g)(88|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.27 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I12} 
MR$from (755|g)(250|g)(|q) (1988Mo16) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$mult from |g(|q) in Coul. ex., |d from (n,|g). Others: +4.0 {I7} in (|a,2n|g), +2.7 {I+9-6} in Coulomb excitation 
$ X(E0/E2)=0.10 {1} in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
MR$from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g). Others: +0.45 {I10} in (|a,2n|g) 
M$from angular distribution and polarization measurements in 1987Sc07 and 1982Ma45. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |a(K)exp and |g|g(|q) (1987Su05) in (n,|g); |d=0.12 to 0.49; sign is negative 
$ X(E0/E2)=0.26 to 9.5 in (n,|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g(842|g):I|g(1080|g):I|g(1530|g) from (n,|g). Values from (n,n'|g) are 233 {I67}:100 {I33}:100 {I33} and from |b{+-} decay are 43 {I5}:65 {I5}: 100 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average from |b{+-} decay and (n,n'|g). E=1834.58 {I23} is reported in (n,|g) but is probably not the same transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g from weighted average of 1973Hi01, 1970Do02 and 1970Pa29; I|g from weighted average of 1973Hi01, 1972Le30, 1970Pa29 and 1970Do02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.24 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I1}, pol=+0.25 {I1} (1987Sc07): A{-2}=+0.19 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I1}, pol=+0.36 {I1} (1982Ma45); Ice(K)=100 {I15}, Ice(L)=9.4 {I2}. |a(K)=0.00133 and |a(L)=0.00014 were used for normalization 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.08 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I3} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=-0.03 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}, pol=+0.11 {I4} (1982Ma45); Ice(K)=25 {I5}, |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.30 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1}, pol=+0.39 {I2} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.27 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I1}, pol=+0.44 {I1} (1982Ma45); Ice(K)=29 {I5}, Ice(L)=2.8 {I6}, |a(K)exp=5.8|*10{+-4} {I11}, |a(L)exp=5.9|*10{+-5} {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.24 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I4} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.21 {I2} (1982Ma45) 
MR$1982Ma45 report |d=-2.6 +10 -12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}, pol=+0.17 {I7} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M,MR$1982Ma45 assume mult=M1+E2 with 2 values of |d, {Ii.e.} |d=-1.43 {I+58-82} and |d=0.08 {I+17-15} 
A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I7} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.19 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I4}, pol=+0.24 {I11} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.26 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I5}, pol=+0.46 {I5} (1989Sc07); A{-2}=+0.19 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.19 {I1}, pol=+0.56 {I2} (1982Ma45); Ice(K)=11.7 {I24}, |a(K)exp=4.38|*10{+-4} {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.26 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I5}, pol=-0.32 {I10} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2}, pol=-0.25 {I6} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.22 {I2}, pol=+0.30 {I8} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3}, pol=+0.40 {I6} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
A{-2}=-0.15 {I3}, pol=+0.27 {I11} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=-0.21 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I2}, pol=+0.12 {I7} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.17 {I2}, pol=+0.22 {I6} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.19 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I2}, pol=+1.19 {I4} (1982Ma45) 
M,MR$1982Ma45 deduce M1+E2 with |d=1.28 {I+26-21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
A{-4}=-0.14 {I12} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=-0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I6} (1982Ma45). Negative A{-4} in 1982Ma45 is inconsistent with |DJ=1 transition 
M$1982Ma45 assign mult=E1 with |d=+0.06 {I+11-10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.25 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4}, pol=+0.46 {I8} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.332, A{-4}=-0.086, from 1970Li11; Ice(K)=5.9 {I12}, |a(K)exp=4.2|*10{+-4} {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.43 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.12 {I11} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I3}, pol=+0.40 {I18} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$for pure M1 
M,MR$1982Ma45 give M1+E2 with |d=+0.29 {I+3-6}. A{-2}=+0.40 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.08 {I7}, pol=+0.48 {I15}, |d=+0.05 {I21} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.44 {I3}, pol=+1.27 {I17} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.26 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.18 {I7} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.23 {I2} A{-4}=-0.18 {I3}, pol=+0.30 {I17} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
A{-2}=+0.45 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5}, pol=+0.77 {I19} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.29 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I3}, pol=+0.77 {I9} (1982Ma45) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$for pure M1 
|d=+0.07 {I17} from A{-2}=+0.36 {I5}, pol=+0.62 {I27} (1987Sc07); A{-2}=+0.54 {I6}, pol=+0.97 {I24} (1982Ma45). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ X(E0/E2)=0.10 {1} (1987Su05) 
$ I(CEK)=22.5 5 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 
$ (695|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=+0.43 {I4}, B{-4}=-0.25 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ I(CEK)=2.60 16 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 
$ (885|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=-0.41 {I15}, B{-4}=-1.22 {I15} 
$(885|g)(614|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.25 {I9}, A{-4}=+1.29 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ (889|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=-0.13 {I9}, B{-4}=-0.09 {I10} 
$ I(CEK)=2.34 3 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
$ (1145|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=-0.56 {I8}, B{-4}=-1.31 {I15} 
$(1145|g)(614|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.34 {I11}, A{-4}=+1.40 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2(+E0)
decay_comment:
$ (687|g)[645|g](614|g)(|q): B{-2}=-1.2 {I7}, B{-4}=+0.5 {I5} 
$ X(E0/E2)=0.26 to 9.5 (1987Su05) 
$ I(CEK)=2.81 9 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 
MR$0.12 to 0.49, sign=negative 
RI$from I|g=2.16 {I15} for the observed 687|g, and I|g=0.11 {I2} for the component from the 2682 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ X(E0/E2)=11 {I4} (1987Su05) 
$ (1382|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=+0.12 {I10}, B{-4}=-0.15 {I12} 
$ I(CEK)=1.31 4 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 
M,MR$|a(K)(theory)=0.00019 (E2), 0.00018 (M1). |d(E2/M1)=+0.44 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ (1714|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=-0.53 {I12}, B{-4}=-0.24 {I14} 
$ I(CEK)=1.59 13 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 
$ X(E0/E2)=1.21 {I23} (1987Su05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$ (1722|g)(614|g)(|q): B{-2}=-0.20 {I23}, B{-4}=-0.94 {I19} 
$ I(CEK)=0.54 17 (1987Su05), relative to IG=100 for 613.7G 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$from adopted branching based on consistent. I|g/I|g(1005+1893|g's)=1.18 {I8} as measured in (|b{+-}), (n,n'|g), and (|a,2n|g). The measured value of 2.96 {I16} suggests that the 1198|g must be a multiplet. The remainder of the intensity is unplaced 
$ (1199|g)[694|g](614|g)(|q): B{-2}=+0.8 {I39}, B{-4}=+3.6 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from the level energies. Major component of the 686 transition deexcites the 1995 level 
RI$from I|g/I|g(828|g)=0.113 {I15} in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$shown in authors level scheme as connecting the 3288 and a 3143 level. The final level should perhaps be the 3039 level, the energy difference required is 248.6. A 246.6 |g is also reported by 1974McZR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
RI$0.5 {I2} for E(n)=3.9 MeV, a weak |g ray for the spectrum 
RI$0.5 {I2} for E(n)=3.9 MeV, a weak |g ray for the spectrum for E(n)=4.1 MeV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$B(E2)=0.041 {I+8-7}; B(M1)=0.0010 {I3} (2003Ha15) 
A{-2}=+0.179 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.068 {I21} (1974Ba80) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
RI$621 {I56}, deduced by evaluator from measured equilibrium intensity of 1099 {I100} (1969Ba34) for 95.5|g from {+79}Se isomer decay, and half-lives of 9.01 min {I15} for {+79}As and 3.92 min {I1} for {+79}Se isomer. This value is not given in the data field since it is time-dependent, based on counting schedule 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$from 1972De67 
TI$from IT branching 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$from |a(K)exp=10 {I4} (relative to 7.1 {I15} for 103|g in {+81}Se) (1955Dr43). |a(K)exp=7.4 {I6} (1962We08). |a(K)=7.26 (theory). Ice(K)/(Ice(L)=3.0 {I5} (1955Dr43), 2.9 {I5} (1952Ru10), 3.8 (theory) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from intensity balance at 137 level. The listed I|g values (1989PrZX) were corrected for angular distributions of |g rays involved in this balance. 1989PrZX give I|g(137|g)=100 {I5} 
$Other |g(|q): 1989PrZX 
$A2=+0.02 4, A4=-0.16 5 (1989PrZX). CONTAMINATION FROM 181TA PRESENT IN THE SPECTRUM 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$most places in the thesis value listed is 1256.9 but in table 7 value is 1257.2 which is probably a misprint 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$29 {I2} for 739.3|g+740.3|g. Value given here is deduced from I|g(740|g)/I|g(739|g)=5.0/3.5 (1979Ze02) 
$|g(|q) data for doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=0.94 {I8} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)=0.8|*10{+-4} {I+27-17} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.040 efm {I10} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$DCO value for gate on stretched dipole transition 
$R(|q)(ADO)=2.04 {I26} 
$Compiler obtains B(M1)(W.u.)=0.066 {I+14-10}, B(E2)(W.u.)=20 {I+14-10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=0.95 {I9} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)=7.0|*10{+-4} {I+15-10} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.094 efm {I16} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$Compiler's note: POL is expected to be negative for |DJ=0 transition 
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.49 {I12} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)=3.2|*10{+-4} {I+7-5} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.064 efm {I11} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.87 {I16} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=12.2 {I+18-14} 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=3.2 eb {I5} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.54 {I13} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=56 {I+6-5} 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=2.3 eb {I3} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.43 {I12} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)>23 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}>2.3 eb (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.46 {I13} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)>0.68|*10{+-4} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}>0.039 efm (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=0.59 {I5} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)>0.60|*10{+-4} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}>0.033 efm (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=0.87 {I12} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)=0.78|*10{+-4} {I+26-19} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.032 efm {I33} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.64 {I15} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=44 {I+11-8} 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=2.3 eb {I4} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=0.67 {I7} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)=0.88|*10{+-4} {I+23-16} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.034 efm {I8} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.69 {I15} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=28 {I+9-6} 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=2.1 eb {I3} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.60 {I14} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)=29 {I+6-4} 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=1.8 eb {I2} (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.69 {I18} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)>42 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}>1.6 eb (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=0.67 {I9} 
$Compiler obtains B(E1)(W.u.)>0.49|*10{+-4} 
$Electric dipole moment D{-0}>0.026 efm (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.65 {I14} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)>20 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}>1.3 eb (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=GT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$R(|q)(ADO)=1.61 {I18} 
$Compiler obtains B(E2)(W.u.)>30 
$Electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}>1.6 eb (2021Ra31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M,MR$from |g(|q) in Coul. ex. |d=-0.71 {I+12-17} is also possible but less likely from systematics of second 2+ states in even-even nuclei 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$ from M1 and E2 matrix elements in Coul. Ex. (1995Ka29). Other: -0.31 {I5} or +10 {I+10-2} from |g(|q) in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Reported in (|g,|g') only. The placement is considered suspect since with the quoted intensity in (|g,|g'), it would have been seen in {+80}As |b{+-} decay and in (n,n'|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=783.3 5, RI=8.3 12 (1977SiZT) 
MR$from A{-2}=-0.04 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9}; |d=+5 {I+3-2} or -0.15 {I+9-5} (1989Do14,1988DoZS). But in the evaluator's estimate, |d=-0.4 {I1} or >+8. Both these sets of values are in disagreement with -5 {I+2-6} or -0.71 {I+12-17} from Coul. ex. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$ EG=1294.2 5, RI=3.9 6 (1977SiZT) 
MR$-0.31 {I5} or +10 {I+10-2} (1989Do14,1988DoZS) from A{-2}=+0.03 {I7}, A{-4}=0.00 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D+Q
decay_comment:
$ EG=1645.9 5, RI=5.1 7 (1977SiZT) 
MR$-0.09 {I+2-6} or +1.95 {I7} from A{-2}=+0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I7} 
I|g(1645|g)/I|g(862|g) is low by a factor of |?2 as compared to that from {+80}As |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1986ChZI. I|g=0.10 {I2} (1986ChZI), |?0.03 (1977SiZT). |g not reported by 1999Ko46; uncertain in 1977SiZT 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$from A{-2}=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} and T{-1/2}(1450 level). |d=-0.71 {I+12-17} is also possible but less likely from systematics of first 2+ states in even-even nuclei. Other: |d=-2.5 {I9} from M1 and E2 matrix elements given by 1995Ka29 
$M1 matrix element (1449,2+ to 666,2+)=-0.10 {I+2-5} (1995Ka29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
MR$from M1 and E2 matrix elements of 1995Ka29 
$M1 matrix element (1960,2+ to 666,2+)=-0.10 {I+4-3} (1995Ka29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E,RI,M from {+81}Se IT decay. 
MR <0.0056 if B(M4)(W.u.)<30. From |a(K)exp=7.1 {I3} and |a(L)exp=1.6 {I3} ({+81}Se IT decay) using BriccMixing code, one gets |d=0.171 {I1}; yields higher value compared to RUL. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 388.1 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 388.4 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 10.1 {I12} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 10.8 {I8} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M L|<2 from RUL and 40-ns coin resolving time in (n,|g) E=thermal. Mult.=M2 implies T{-1/2}(491 level)>17 ns if B(M2)(W.u.)<1, so is unlikely. If T{-1/2}(491 level)>40 ns, B(E2)(W.u.)<0.007 (also unlikely). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 491.2 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 491.33 {I15} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M D,E2 from RUL and 40-ns coin resolving time in (n,|g) E=thermal; |DJ>1 from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 156.0 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 156.4 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
M M1,E2 expected for 5/2- to 3/2- transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 949.7 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 949.65 {I25} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI for doublet in (n,|g) E=thermal; undivided I|g given. Only this branch is reported in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 915.0 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 915.4 {I6} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 10.2 {I20} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 7.7 {I31} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 938.9 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 938.7 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 33 {I6} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 27.7 {I31} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1842.1 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 1841.9 {I5} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 61 {I9} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 46 {I9} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 1864.5 {I2} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 1865.3 {I3} from (n,|g) E=thermal 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I11} from {+81}As |b{+-} decay and 100 {I12} from (n,|g) E=thermal 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E reported only in |b{+-} decay; placement implies mult=M2, see comments with the level for J{+|p}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E could be same as 2570|g in (n,|g) E=thermal or could be doublet deexciting both 2569 and 2570 levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 491.1 {I2} (1974Ch11) and 491.3 {I2} (1975Kr08). 
RI weighted average of 42.5 {I5} (1974Ch11) and 42.7 {I23} (1975Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 521.1 {I2} (1974Ch11) and 521.1 {I2} (1975Kr08). 
RI weighted average of 7.3 {I7} (1974Ch11) and 6.0 {I13} (1975Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3(+M4)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI 100 {I2} in 2015Kr02 
|a(K)exp, |a(L)exp: from simultaneous measurement of |g and electron spectra, respectively, with Ge(Li) detector and Si(Li) spectrometer; system calibrated against {+141}Ce(145 keV), {+203}Hg(279 keV), {+198}Au(442 keV), {+137}Cs(662 keV) lines (1971Na18). Other: |a(K)exp=8.6 {I24} (1955Dr43); |a(K)exp=8.3 {I3} from I(K| x ray)/I(103|g)=4.9 {I2} and |w{-K}=0.589 (1968Ra35); |a(K)exp/|a(L+...)exp=3.9 (1949Be59), 4.0 (1955Dr43); |a(K)exp/|a(L)exp=3.0 (1952Ru10). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1981En07. Other: 4976.1 {I10} (1971Ra07), 4975.5 {I5} (2007ChZX). 
Other I|g: 5.2 {I18} (2007ChZX, 'Budapest' data), 8.8 {I20} (1981En07), 8.4 (1970Ba54). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E from 1981En07. Other: 6233.0 {I15} (1971Ra07) 
Other I|g: 29 {I7} (1981En07), 21 (1970Ba54). However, |g is absent in 2007ChZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$likely corresponds to an unplaced E|g=310.0 {I3}, I|g=2.7 {I3} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$likely corresponds to an unplaced E|g=582.0 {I1}, I|g=9.9 {I4} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$1975Kr08 observed a |g ray with E|g=833.8 {I1}, I|g=19.5 {I17} which could not be placed in the decay scheme. 1975Kr08 observe coincidences with the 735|g, inconsistent with its placement from 1062-keV level. 1984LiZW do not observe coincidences between the 834|g and the 735|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$likely corresponds to an unplaced E|g=1822.4 {I1}, I|g=7.9 {I7} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$half-life of transition not in agreement with that of {+83}As, not included in the Adopted Levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$likely corresponds to an unplaced E|g=1013.7 {I2}, I|g=6.1 {I5} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$possibly corresponds to an unplaced E|g=1057.6 {I2}, I|g=4.7 {I10} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$possibly corresponds to an unplaced E|g=1158.4 {I2}, I|g=4.6 {I5} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$possibly corresponds to an unplaced E|g=2316.5 {I10}, I|g=1.8 {I9} transition observed in 1975Kr08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1454.55 {I10} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 1455.1 {I2} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay), 1454.5 {I2} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 1454.7 {I1} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=1455.1 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 
M$from {+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 666.97 {I10} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 667.1 {I2} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay), 666.8 {I3} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 667.0 {I1} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=667.1 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 
M$from {+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 577.84 {I10} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 577.5 {I2} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I3} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 100 {I15} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1245.3 {I2} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 1244.6 {I2} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay) 
RI$weighted average of 85 {I5} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 67 {I12} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1843.13 {I10} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 1843.7 {I2} ({+85}As |b{+-}n decay) 
RI$from {+84}As |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1249.0 {I2} ({+84}As |b{+-} decay), 1248.7 {I2} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 1249.0 {I3} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=1249.6 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1415.3 {I2} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 1415.3 {I3} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=1415 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 164.1 {I2} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 164.7 {I5} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=165 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 
RI$weighted average of 80 {I40} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 39 {I8} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)) 
M$from |g(|q) in {+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1579.8 {I3} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 1580.2 {I3} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=1580 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I21} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 100 {I22} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)) 
M$from |g(|q) in {+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 704.4 {I4} ({+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g)), 704.3 {I3} ({+192}Os({+82}Se,X|g)). Other: E|g=703.5 ({+252}Cf SF decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Note that a 1361.5|g in {+238}U(p,F|g) is placed from a 4898 to 3537 level, and similar placement for a 1361.4|g in {+208}Pb({+18}O,X|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Weak peak in |g spectrum of 2015Li42. This peak corresponds to 1270|g feeding the first 6+ state, as reported by 2013DrZY or Doppler-shifted peak of 1287|g from 3408 level feeding the first 4+ state, or a mixture of the contribution from both 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from |b{+-} decay. Other: 1436.1 {I5} in ({+18}O,X|g), not used since there is also 1437.5|g in this reaction 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$462.0 (2012Ku06) 
$Other: E|g=461.5 {I3}, I|g=2.4 {I5} (relative to 100 for 1455|g from {+84}As decay (1975Kr08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$(863|g)(704|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.097 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.014 {I16} consistent with stretched quadrupole for both transitions 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
E$From {+86}Se Adopted dataset in the ENSDF database (Jan 2016 update) 
$2017El04 discuss a peak at 613 keV at the low-energy shoulder of the 704-keV peak. A weak 613|g was reported by 2015Ma61 (Phys. Rev. C92, 054317) in {+86}As decay in coin with 704 gamma, suggesting a level at 1317 keV. This conclusion is not supported by 2017El04 who claim that 613|g is not in coincidence with 704|g 
$B(E2)(W.u.) deduced by compiler from B(E2)|^ values in 2017El04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$Based on angular correlations for the 91.9-886.2 keV cascade leading to |d=+0.53 {I +31-12} or +5.0 {I +162, -27}. Additionally, as B(M2)(W.u.)<1 from RUL, a half life can be calculated for E1+M2, assuming the lowest allowed |d of 0.41, resulting in T{-1/2}>27 |ms. As this likely would not have been observed, E1+M2 may be excluded. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$Based on angular correlations for the 91.9-886.2 keV cascade. A{-2}=+0.10 {i5}, A{-4}=-0.11 {i9} leading to |d=+0.53 {I +31-12} or +5.0 {I +162, -27}. Additionally, as B(M2)(W.u.)<1 from RUL, a half life can be calculated for E1+M2, assuming the lowest allowed |d of 0.41, resulting in T{-1/2}>27 |ms. As this likely would have been observed, E1+M2 may be excluded. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
TI$From 2015Ko19 
RI$Deduced by compilers using authors' I(|g+ce) and |a{-tot}(M1)=0.1270 {I22} (BrIcc v2.3b) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$744.5 given by authors in Table 1 of 2015Ko19 is a misprint as stated in email reply from authors to XUNDL compiler on December 7, 2015 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$2156.3 given by authors in Figure 2b and Figure 3 (2015Ko19) was rounded to 2156 {I1} as stated in email reply from authors to XUNDL compiler on December 7, 2015 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: Q
decay_comment:
RI$intensity for 598.0 and 598.7 |g rays is undivided 
M$from DCO in {+40}Ca({+34}S,p2n|g),({+35}Cl,2p2n|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (Q)
decay_comment:
$DCO(for 737|g,198|g pair)=0.43 {I29} suggests quadrupole-dipole sequence. 
$Angular intensity ratio R(90|'/135|')=0.75 {I13}, consistent with Q, |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
TI$deduced by evaluators from intensity balance at 9.8-keV level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Others: E|g=198/199 (2022Wa34) as unresolved doublet; E|g=198, I|g(relative)=100 (1997Oi01) or 85 from a reanalysis of |g-ray spectrum in 1997Oi01. 2005Fi10 suggested that 198|g was a doublet, with 15% of this intensity belonging to a 199|g from 407 level, and 85% to 198|g from 208 level. This estimate is not confirmed by 2022Wa34, where I|g(198.0 from 208 level)/I|g(199.0 from 407 level)=0.81 {I25}. 
M,MR$from the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Other: E|g: 208, I|g(relative)=36 (1997Oi01). From a reanalysis of |g-ray spectrum in 1997Oi01, 2005Fi10 suggested that 208|g was a doublet with 207|g from 208 level, and a 208|g from a 615 level. From I|g(207|g)/I|g(198|g)=19/81 (2005Fi10); I|g(208)(relative)|?20 from 208 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Other I|g(relative)|?16 deduced by 2005Fi10 from |g-spectrum in 1997Oi01, and I|g(199|g)/I|g(407|g)=15/60 (2005Fi10). This value is in severe disagreement with that from 2022Wa34 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Other I|g(relative)|?27 deduced by 2005Fi10 from |g-spectrum in 1997Oi01, and I|g(397|g)/I|g(407|g)=25/60 (2005Fi10) 
M$Q in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
$Other I|g(relative)|?64 deduced by 2005Fi10 from spectrum in 1997Oi01 
M,MR$from the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 30.5 {I5} ({+72}Kr |e decay), 30.4 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 87.2 {I5} ({+72}Kr |e decay), 86.7 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 86.9 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 9.6 {I23} ({+72}Kr |e decay), 15 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 228.6 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 229.87 {I13} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: D
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 115.1 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 114.96 {I5} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 43 {I5} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 87 {I10} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 201.8 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 202.15 {I9} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 100 {I10} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 100 {I10} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 88.5 {I5} ({+72}Kr |e decay), 87.8 {I3} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 14 {I11} ({+72}Kr |e decay), 7.7 {I23} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 398.4 {I2} ({+72}Kr |e decay), 397.9 {I1} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 398.3 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$DCO=0.84 {I4} 
E$weighted average of 135.9 {I3} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 135.4 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 
RI$weighted average of 12.0 {I4} ({+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)), 28 {I4} ({+58}Ni({+16}O,pn|g), {+40}Ca({+36}Ar,3pn|g)) 


