# DECAY

decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Largest in {+228}Ac decay, since the |g-ray set seems more in {+228}Pa, the evaluator adopts I|g reported in {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g not reported in {+228}Pa decay 
RI$Adopted as a ratio between I{-|g}(1958.2) ({+228Pa}/{+228Ac}) since I{-|g}(1772.2) is largest in {+228}Ac and it is not reported in {+228}Pa decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp=124 {I11} (1971He23); L12/L3=1.42 (1982Ma52), 1.14 {I8} (1960Ar06), 1.15 {I15} (1957Bj56); theory: |a(K)=114, L12/L3=1.23 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M L12/L3=1.94 {I14} (1960Ar06), 1.7 {I2} (1957Bj56). K/L=0.10 {I1} (1971He23), 0.12 {I3} (1957Bj56); theory: L12/L3=1.70, K/L=0.10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.24 {I7}, K/L=1.0 {I5}; theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.174, K/L(E2)=0.39, |a(K)(M1)=2.49, K/L(M1)=5.25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M ce(K) not seen by 1960Ar06. |a(K)exp=0.41 {I8} (1971He23) does not agree with [E1] required by the level scheme or E1 measured in {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.024 {I3} (1960Ar06), 0.07 {I3} (1971He23) inconsistent with each other and with E2 assignment required by level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0104 {I10}, K/L=4.6 {I5} (1971He23), |a(K)exp=0.0092 {I9} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0091, K/L=4.04. |d=+24 {I8} from {+228}Pa decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I3} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.00815, |a(L)=0.0194; |a(K)exp used in normalization of the ce spectra. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=2.0 {I4} (1971He23) may indicate an E0 component 
Total intensity placed here by 1987Da28 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g not placed here by 1987Da28; this placement of the |g suggested in {+228}Pa decay 
$Poor fit in the level scheme. Ignored in the intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.027 {I10} (1971He23), ce(K) not seen (1960Ar06); |a(K)exp does not agree with |a(K)exp measured in {+228}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(L3)exp|?0.43 (1971He23); theory: |a(L3)(E1)=0.0213, |a(L3)(M2)=8.66. |a(L3)exp could also fit M1+E2; however, level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0118 {I20}, K/L=1.6 {I7} (1971He23), |a(K)exp=0.0139 {I19} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0116, |a(K)(M1)=0.0524 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR from |a(K)exp=1.5 {I8} (1971He23); also fits E1+M2 with |d=0.35 {I12}, level scheme requires |D|p=no. Theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.104, |a(K)(E2)=0.203, |a(K)(M1)=3.26, |a(K)(M2)=12.9 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_comment:
M K/L=4.0 {I5}, L1/L2=33 {I6}, L1/L3>>50 (1974De14), |a(K)exp=53 {I7} (1971He23); measured |a(K)exp yields an E0 transition with an admixture of: 5.4% M1 with K/L=5.2, L1/L2=30, L1/L3=3300, or 1.4% E2 with K/L=5.0, L1/L2=16.5, L1/L3=58. Thus the ratios support E0+M1 transition 
CC from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp(doublet)=0.18 {I4} (1960Ar06), |a(L)exp(279|g+282|g)=0.37 {I7} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.872, |a(K)(E2)=0.0854 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.49 {I8} (1971He23) indicating mainly M1 transition (|a(K)(M1)=0.590) which is not in agreement with the level scheme. 1960Ar06 did not see ce(K) suggesting that the |a(K)exp may be unreliable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$ Total intensity (I|g=0.013 {I3}) placed from 1344.1 level by 1987Da28. Alternate placement from 1928.6 level suggested by {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.058 {I9}, K/L=2.0 {I4} (1971He23), |a(K)exp=0.049 {I4} (1960Ar06). Theory: |a(K)=0.049 {I4}, K/L=2.02 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.036 {I4}, K/L=3.0 {I7} (1971He23); |a(K)exp=0.028 {I3} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0316, K/L=2.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay. 
|g may be masked by strong 328.000|g. 
E E|g from E(level) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.9 {I9} (1971He23) does not agree with multipolarity deduced from level scheme. Theory: |a(K)=0.0523 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp|<0.08 (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.0094, |a(K)(E2)=0.0251, |a(K)(E3)=0.0610, |a(K)(M1)=0.158 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays 
I|g(doublet)=0.052 {I5}. All of intensity placed here by 1987Da28, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
|g listed in table I of 1987Da28 as deexciting the 1682.8 level; however, on level scheme (fig. 4) shown as deexciting the 1683.8 level. The energy fit is much better from the 1683.8 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$ From intensity balance at 1646 level, multipolarity cannot be pure E2. Some E2 admixture, however, cannot be ruled out 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
|g listed in table I of 1987Da28 as deexciting the 1683.8 level; however, on level scheme (fig. 4) shown as deexciting the 1688.4 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$ In {+228}Pa decay this |g is assigned to this level based on the level scheme, and is given an intensity upper limit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.20 {I8} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.125 
1987Da28 assigns this |g to be the 1539.2 to 968.4 transition on the basis of coin with 911.2|g. However, the E(level) difference is 570.25 {I9}. In {+228}Pa decay this |g is assigned to the 1724.3 level; energy, intensity, multipolarity, and coin results agree with this assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$|g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.28 {I14} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0637, |a(K)(E2)=0.0133, |a(K)(M2)=0.147. Unconfirmed |a(K)exp seems to indicate E0 admixture 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays. 
This placement of the |g suggested by {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2+E0)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.17 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.13 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0148, |a(K)(M1)=0.0751. |a(K)exp may indicate E0 presence. 
E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays. 
This placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay 
M |a(K)exp(doublet)=0.054 {I11} (1973Ku09), I|g(doublet)=3.8; theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0497 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=1.1 {I2} (1971He23) indicates E0 component; however, then the relatively strong 887.33 |g to 1123 {I2}- level must be M2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M L1/L3=0.036 {I11}, L2/L3=1.187 {I5}, M1/M2=0.0328 {I27}, M2/M3=1.137 {I19} (1970SpZW); theory: L1/L3=0.0390, L2/L3=1.19, M1/M2=0.0382, M2/M3=1.14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M K/L12=4.4 (1960Ar06); theory: K/L12(E1)=5.9, K/L12(E2)=0.69, K/L12(M1)=5.3. |a(K)exp=0.075 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.0678, |a(K)(M1)=1.94 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+(M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0119 {I17} (1973Ku09), 0.0105 {I15} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0106 
MR |<-9 from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42) 
MR$from 1/|d=-0.014 {I25} (1998We13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+(M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.012 {I5} (1973Ku09), 0.011 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00821; |a(K)(M1)=0.0295 
MR$ +33 {I20} from 1/|d=+0.03 {I4} (1998We13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
MR$calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator) 
M |a(K)exp=0.10 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.075 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0842, |a(K)(E2)=0.0161 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.012 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.0092 (1960Ar06) theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00921, |a(K)(M1)=0.0374 
MR |>+3.7 from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.014 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.014 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0116, |a(K)(M1)=0.0524. |d=4 from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_comment:
E$ Poor fit in level scheme. 184.325 keV from level difference 
M |a(L12)exp=15 (1960Ar06); |a(L12)=10.2 for 5.4% M1 (10.5 for 1.4%E2) transition deduced from {+228}Ac |b{+-} decay 
CC from {+228}Ac |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$ Adopted based on value deduced from gtol computer code available at Brookhaven lab's website 
M 1995Ba42 gives M=(E2), data not given. For the doublet: |a(K)exp=0.26 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.872, |a(K)(E2)=0.0854 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0157 {I22} (1973Ku09), 0.015 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0122, |a(K)(M1)=0.0565. |d=3.41 from |a(K)exp 
MR$from 1/|d=-0.27 {I6} (1998We13). 1995Ba42 lists -19|<|d|<-3 from |g(|q,H,t) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI I|g(doublet)=7.1 {I4} and I|g(|g from 1297.42 level)=2.4 {I2} (from coin) 
M for the 1110.55 doublet: |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.0019 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.00237 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from ce(L1) (1995Ba42) 
M no |g seen. No ce(L3) seen, |a(L12)exp>6 (1960Ar06) 
TI I(ce(L12)) (1960Ar06) 
$ce(K)=68.49, ce(L1)=157.67, ce(L2)=158.45 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR |a(K)exp=0.020 {I6} (1973Ku09), thus |d|>2; theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0143, |a(K)(M1)=0.0711 
MR$-4.0 {I13} from 1/|d=-0.25 {I8} (1998We13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0140 {I18} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0107, |a(K)(M1)=0.0468 
MR$-12 {I5} from 1/|d=-0.08 {I3} (1998We13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Feeds the 695.6 level; see comment with that level 
M |a(K)exp|>0.24 {I5} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00716, |a(K)(E2)=0.0192, |a(K)(M1)=0.108 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M for the 1110.55 doublet: |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.0019 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.00237 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M from K:L12:L3=140:90:30, |a(K)exp=0.061 (1960Ar06); theory: K:L12:L3=140:74:18, |a(K)=0.071 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.049, K:L12:L3=54 {I3}:21 {I1}:4.6 {I3} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1+E2)=0.048 {I4}, K:L12:L3=54:22:4.3 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.044 {I5} (1973Ku09), |a(K)exp=0.035, K/L12=2.64 {I21}, K/L3=11.6 {I8} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0316, K/L12=2.44, K/L3=13.7; K/L3(M1)=1220 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E deduced from E(level) 
TI deduced from coin experiment which gives branching=18% {I2} for decay from 1450 level to 1432 level (1995Ba42). 
RI from I(|g+ce) and |a 
$I(|g+ce)=45 {I7} (1998We13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.62, K/L12=4.1 {I5}, K/L3=58 {I6} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.69 {I6}, K/L12=4.9 {I6}, K/L3=133 {I43} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.055 (1960Ar06) based on the division of I|g and E1 mult. in alternate placement. Theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0619, |a(K)(M1)=0.559 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(L12)exp=2.0, no ce(L3), L/M=2.0, L/N=6 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(L12)=3.06, |a(L3)=0.0165 
MR |<0.4 from ce data (data not given) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0105 {I20} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00571, |a(K)(M1)=0.0185 
MR$ calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.010 {I3} (1971Am05); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00517, |a(K)(M1)=0.0160 
MR$ calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+(E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(L12)exp=1.23, ce(L3) not seen (1960Ar06); theory: M1: |a(L12)=1.20, |a(L3)=0.00622; E2: |a(L12)=1.22, |a(L3)=0.690 
MR -0.2|<|d|<1.4 (|g(|q,H,t)), |<0.3 (|a) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ The measured intensity suggests that this line doublet with an unassigned line at E|g|?1431 
RI from I|g/I|g(1560|g) in adopted |g's. I|g(doublet)|<1.8 and 
M for the doublet |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I7} (1973Ku09); |a(K)(E2)=0.00409, |a(K)(M1)=0.0113 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M for the 1245+1246 doublet: |a(K)exp=0.0088 {I11} (1973Ku09), 0.021 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0162, |a(K)(E2)=0.00521 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M for the doublet (I|g=2.47 {I13}): |a(K)exp=0.053 {I16} (1973Ku09), 0.025 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0831, |a(K)(E2)=0.0160 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.17 {I5} (1973Ku09), 0.10 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0936, |a(K)(E2)=0.0217, |a(K)(M1+E2)= 0.06 for |d=1 probably a E0 component is involved 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I4} (1971Am05), 0.0031 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0034, |a(K)(E1)=0.0013, |a(K)(M1)=0.0086 
MR |<-6 from nuclear orientation (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E this |g is placed by 1995Ba42. A 1286.27 {I20} |g seen in {+228}Ac decay is placed from the 1344.08 level. However, the ratio I|g/I|g(1496.15|g)=0.14 {I3} here does not agree with I|g/I|g(1495.91|g)=0.058 {I15} in {+228}Ac decay. The calculated energy of the transition from the 1682.8 level is 1286.73 {I3}. From 1344.08 level the ratio I|g/I|g(947.98|g)=0.47 {I10} in {+228}Ac decay; in this decay, I(948|g)|?0.2 giving the estimated I|g|?0.1 for that placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.012 {I2} (1973Ku09), 0.014 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00588, |a(K)(M1)=0.0193 
MR$calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0104 {I15} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0149, |a(K)(E2)=0.00492 
MR$calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0081 {I21} (1971Am05); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0084 
MR 0.00 {I5} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I11} (1973Ku09), 0.0061 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.00352, |a(K)(M1)=0.00908 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0146, |a(K)(E2)=0.00486, |a(K)(E1)=0.00182, |a(K)(M2)=0.0146 
MR$calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator). +0.27|<|d|<+5 from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M for the doublet (I|g=2.47 {I13}): |a(K)exp=0.053 {I16} (1973Ku09), 0.025 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00591, |a(K)(E2)=0.0160 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2+E0)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.17 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.13 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0148, |a(K)(M1)=0.0751. |a(K)exp may indicate E0 presence. 
CC from |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.18 {I5} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0637, |a(K)(E2)=0.013, ce(K) may include the ce(K)(737.8|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.038 {I5} (1973Ku09), 0.046 (1960Ar06): theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0414 
MR -0.1 {I1} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I23} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00142, |a(K)(E2)=0.00374 
|g not reported in {+228}Ac decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I11} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.00138, |a(K)(E2)=0.00364, |a(K)(M1)=0.0095; 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$calculated from experimental conversion coefficient (evaluator) 
M |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I8} (1971Am05), 0.0057 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0074, |a(K)(E2)=0.0030 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Not reported in 1998We13 
RI from branching ratio in adopted |g's; I|g|<0.4 (1995Ba42) 
Possibility feeds the 1539.2 level; see comment with that level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I14} (1973Ku09); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0026, |a(K)(M1)=0.0071 |a(K)(E1)=0.00100, |a(K)(M2)=0.0138 
MR -0.32 {I9} or -1.7 {I3} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M |a(K)exp=0.025 {I6} (1973Ku09), 0.034 (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0306, |a(K)(E2)=0.00804 
MR 0.00 {I5} from |g(|q,H,t) (1995Ba42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC 158 {I7} (1968Du06) 
M L1:L2:L3=3.55 {I25}:115 {I4}:100 (1966Ha01); M1:M2:M3=5.3 {I13}:107 {I8}:100, M3/L3=0.32 {I3} (1966Ra15); theory: L1:L2:L3=3.90:119:100, M1:M2:M3=4.35:114:100, M3/L3=0.276 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 42.45 {I5} (2002Gu15) and 42.34 {I10} (2006Ru07). 
E$E|g for doublet=42.584 {I5} 
RI$0.94 {I4} for 42.45+42.63 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 42.63 {I5} (2002Gu15) and 42.68 {I4} (2006Ru07). 
E$E|g for doublet=42.584 {I5} (2002Gu15) 
RI$0.94 {I4} for 42.45+42.63 (2002Gu15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 259.33 {I4} (2002Gu15) and 259.30 {I4} (2006Ru07). 
E$level-energy difference=259.49 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 288.3 {I1} (2002Gu15) and 288.04 {I4} (2006Ru07). 
E$level-energy difference=288.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 248.4 {I1} (2002Gu15) and 248.74 {I6} (2006Ru07). 
E$level-energy difference=248.73 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 259.0 {I1} (2002Gu15) and 259.40 {I3} (2006Ru07). 
E$level-energy difference=259.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 189.60 {I4} (2002Gu15) and 189.6 {I1} (2006Ru07). 
E$level-energy difference=189.91 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1[+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I(ce(N); 29|g)/I(ce(M); 42|g)=0.15 {I5}/3.3 {I5} (1989AhZZ), |a(M)(42|g)=27 {I8}, I|g(42|g)=0.15 {I1}, and |a(N)(29|g)=9.0. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR From {+233}U |a decay. 
M from ce measurements of 1958Hi78: L1/L2/L3/M1/M2/M3/N2+N3=15/25/30/3/10/9/13. See also {+233}U |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(74.57|g)/I|g(146.4|g)=0.15 {I1}, as measured in {+233}U |a decay, and I|g(146.4|g)=0.33 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(76.39|g)/I|g(119.0|g)=0.083 {I9}, as measured in {+233}U |a decay, and I|g(119.0|g)=0.44 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$Estimated internal conversion coefficient (2017Se01), based on theoretical estimated lifetime of |?10{+4} s for the photonic decay channel through M1 transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$using the radiative width to the ground state, |G{-|g}{+in} = 14.3 neV {I14}, taken as an average of (1976Kr03) and (2003Ba78), 2019Ma63 derived a branching ratio to the ground state as B = 1/(9.4 {I24}) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$2020Si22 report a ratio of <0.7% relative to I(42.4331|g) for an unobserved transition to the 3/2+ isomer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from the average wavelength value of 148.71 nm {I6} (stat) {I41} (syst) photon corresponding to 0.008338 keV {I3} (stat) {I23} (syst) emitted from the CaF{-2} and MgF{-2} crystals in 2023Kr02. The final uncertainty is added in quadrature. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from the average wavelength value of 148.38219 nm {I4} (stat) {I20} (syst) (2024El03). Value is reported as 8.355733 eV {I2} (stat) {I10} (syst). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$Although an admixture of M1 multipolarity is possible, the 332.0-keV |g ray is assumed to be E2, since a J|p=2+,K=2 to 2+,0 M1 transition is K forbidden and since the relative photon intensities of 332.0|g and 374.7|g agree with the Alaga rule (see {+230}Ac |b{+-} decay) when 332.0|g is taken as E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$503.55 keV {I10} measured in {+230}Pa |e+|b{++} decay is inconsistent with final state energy. The evaluator has increased the uncertainty to 1 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$From {+230}Th(d,pn|g), scaled by the ratio of the 934 and 1055 intensities in Coulomb excitation. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$The 450-keV |g from J|p=3- of K=2 band to the J|p=2+ state of the K=0 band is a K-forbidden [E1] transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$M1 part of the 556.0|g from the 3- state of the K=2 band to the 3- state of the K=0 octupole band is K-forbidden. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Total Ice=7.8 {I20} from Ice(634.9|g)/I|g(581.7|g)=29 {I6}/24 {I3}, as observed in {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(503.5|g)/I|g(677.6|g)=0.79 {I17}, measured in {+230}Th Coulomb excitation. I|g=2.1 {I4} was measured for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from Coulomb excitation. This |g was not observed in {+230}Ac |b{+-} decay. 
$The ratio of I|g(146.7|g)/I|g(728.0|g)=0.245 {I12}, measured in Coulomb excitation yields I|g(146.7|g)=1.4 {I6}. See "Coulomb excitation" for a comment for its reduced transition rate, if its relative intensity from the level were correct. See also {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2+M1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Total Ice=1.4 {I6} from Ice(228.0|g)/I|g(956.5|g)=77 {I23}/290 {I60}, as observed in {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2(+M1)]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$I|g(332.0|g)/I|g(375.2|g)=1.6 {I10} measured here is consistent with the ratio of 1.43, expected from Alaga rule, if the 332.0|g is an E2 transition. An admixture of M1 which is K-forbidden is not ruled out. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$The 508-keV |g ray from the J|p=2- state of K=2 band to the J|p=3- state of K=1 band is assumed to be either M1 or E2, or M1+E2. See {+230}Pa |e decay for a comment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=0.22, K/L/M=113/20/8 (1972Va24) 
MR$|d=1.80 {I7} is also possible from |g|g(|q,t,H). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp=77 {I12}/1.1 {I2}=70 {I17}, and |a(L)exp=14 {I2}/1.1 {I2}=13 {I3}, deduced by evaluator from data reported in 1994Ac02. ce(L1)/ce(L3)|>35 (1994Ac02). See also 1970Lo02, 1971Ku25. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$503.55 keV {I10} as measured in 1994Ac02 is inconsistent with final-state energy. Therefore, and in light of the fact that this |g ray is multiply placed, the evaluator has increased the uncertainty to 1 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$I|g(53.2|g)=0.156% {I6} was measured by 1990Ko40. Intensities of transitions feeding the ground-state sum to I(|g+ce)(53.20|g)+I(4722.7|a)=100.1% {I5} with I|g=0.123 {I2}; whereas I|g=0.156 {I6} yields 107.9% {I15}. 
M$|a(L)exp=130 {I65} by (|a)(L| x ray)/(|a)(|g) (1957Vo26). See also {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from {+230}Pa |e decay. E|g=460 was measured by 1963Bj03 in {+234}U |a decay by |a|g coincidences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$from {+230}Pa |e decay. E|g=510 was measured by 1963Bj03 in {+234}U |a decay by |a|g coincidences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+230}Ac |b{+-} decay and {+230}Pa |e decay. E|g=585 was measured by 1963Bj03 in {+234}U |a decay by |a|g coincidences. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$measured in {+230}Pa |e decay. This transition was not observed in {+234}U |a decay. 
$Total ce intensity is expected to be about 1.4|*10{+-5}% from I|g(581.8|g)/Ice(634|g) observed in {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. E|g=53.4 was measured by 1961Re02. 
M$(L1+L2)/L3=1.10 {I5} (1961Re02). See also {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(508.2|g)=205 {I10} is listed in 1989Ku23 for the doublet. The deduced I|g(508|g deexciting 1079-keV level)=4 {I2}, yields I|g(508.2|g deexciting 508-keV level)/I|g(455|g)=201 {I11}/255 {I10}=0.79 {I6} in Coulomb excitation; however, 0.57 {I6} was deduced in {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$I|g(146.7|g)=13 {I6} was measured by 1989Ku23 and assigned this |g ray as a transition from the 2+ state of the |g-vibrational band to the 0+ |b-vibrational state (146.7-keV photon is not listed in 1984Ge03). Nonobservation of a 146.6-keV photon in {+230}Pa |e decay and in {+230}Ac |b{+-} decay implies that the 146.6-keV transition could be a doublet, and its component deexciting the 781-keV level is possibly weak. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(651|g)/I|g(772|g)=0.41 {I13} in 1989Ku23, 0.28 {I12} in 1984Ge03, in 0.17 {I6} from {+230}Pa |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g(1009|g)/I|g(956|g)=0.68 {I15} was measured in {+230}Pa |e decay; this ratio is 0.36 {I10} in 1989Ku23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$From I|g(440|g)/I|g(959|g)=0.25 {I10}, as measured in {+230}Pa |e decay, I|g(440.8|g deexciting 1012.6 level)|<1.25; I|g(440.8|g)=11 {I5} is listed in 1989Ku23. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$From I|g(571|g)/I|g(1026|g)=0.74 {I4}, measured in {+230}Th decay, I|g(571.1|g) is expected to be 19 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$somewhat poor fit. Level-energy difference=120.15 {I3} 
E$from |a decay, based on least squares fit E|g=119.989 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$reported E|g=3981.82 {I17} in (n,|g) E=th (1987Wh01), but level-energy difference gives 3984.35 {I9}, which after removal of recoil is 3984.31, which is adopted here in place of authors' value of 3981.82 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$based on |g-ray placement, level-energy difference is 3984.32 {I22}. See also comment for this |g in the Adopted dataset, where recommended E|g=3984.31 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$from I(|g+ce)=38 {I3} (1999Aa03) and |a=440 {I100}. 1999Aa03 give I|g=0.08 {I2} using |a=450 {I80}. Other I(|g+ce)=37.0 (1986Gi08). 
M,MR$from the Adopted dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$143.7 {I2} (1986Gi08), 143.6 {I2} (1973Ch24) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average: 8.6 {I5} (1999Aa03), 8.5 {I9} (1986Gi08), 8.3 {I11} and 10 {I3} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$185.7 {I2} (1986Gi08), 185.6 {I2} (1973Ch24), 185.68 {I2} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$Mandel-Paule average: 43.0 {I20} (1999Aa03), 38.0 {I20} (1986Gi08), 42.8 {I8} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only), 43 {I5} and 49 {I9} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$221.2 {I2} (1986Gi08), 221.2 {I2} (1973Ch24), 221.38 {I1} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$Mandel-Paule average: 48.2 {I24} (1999Aa03), 39.7 {I20} (1986Gi08), 45.4 {I4} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only), 49 {I6} and 56 {I9} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$198.9 {I2} (1986Gi08), 198.9 {I2} (1973Ch24) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average: 6.6 {I12} (1999Aa03), 7.5 {I8} (1986Gi08), 7.2 {I10} and 6 {I3} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$240.9 {I2} (1986Gi08), 240.6 {I2} (1973Ch24), 240.89 {I5} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$Mandel-Paule average: 11.3 {I8} (1999Aa03), 9.4 {I9} (1986Gi08), 10.5 {I9} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only), 11.0 {I14} and 6 {I3} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) for assumed 0.1 keV uncertainty in transition energy 
RI$from 1999Aa03, based on estimated I(|g+ce) (1999Aa03) and |a for M1. Other I(|g+ce)=74.7 (1986Gi08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$247.4 {I2} (1986Gi08), 247.4 {I2} (1973Ch24) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average: 1.5 {I4} (1999Aa03), 0.7 {I5} (1986Gi08), 1.1 {I2} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) for assumed 0.1 keV uncertainty in transition energy 
RI$from 1999Aa03, based on estimated I(|g+ce) (1999Aa03) and |a for M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) for assumed 0.1 keV uncertainty in transition energy 
RI$from 1999Aa03, based on estimated I(|g+ce) (1999Aa03) and |a for M1. Other I(|g+ce)=50.9 (1986Gi08) 
M$from 1986Gi08, based on measured |a(L)exp from the observed intensity of L x-rays in coincidence with the 241|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|a(theory) for assumed 0.1 keV uncertainty in transition energy 
RI$from estimated I(|g+ce)=37 {I4}-I(|g+ce)(24.6|g) (1999Aa03) and |a for M1. Note that in Table 2, 1999Aa03 give I|g|<1.3. Other: I(|g+ce)=39.0 (1986Gi08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$271.9 {I2} (1986Gi08), 271.9 {I2} (1973Ch24) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average: 6.8 {I8} (1999Aa03), 6.3 {I8} (1986Gi08), 6.7 {I10} and 9 {I3} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$282.3 {I2} (1986Gi08), 282.3 {I2} (1973Ch24), 282.46 {I1} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$100 {I3} (1999Aa03), 100.0 {I30} (1986Gi08), 100 {I8} (1985Hi02), 100 {I10} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$306.9 {I2} (1986Gi08), 306.9 {I2} (1973Ch24), 307.05 {I1} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$Mandel-Paule average: 76.9 {I26} (1999Aa03), 75.2 {I25} (1986Gi08), 79.1 {I9} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only), 77 {I9} and 84 {I13} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$368.8 {I2} (1986Gi08), 368.8 {I2} (1973Ch24), 368.93 {I1} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$Mandel-Paule average: 38.3 {I24} (1999Aa03), 36.0 {I15} (1986Gi08), 39.6 {I5} (1985Hi02, statistical uncertainty only), 38 {I5} and 37 {I7} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$372.0 {I2} (1986Gi08), 372.0 {I2} (1973Ch24) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average: 4.1 {I11} (1999Aa03), 3.4 {I8} (1986Gi08), 4.4 {I7} (1973Ch24) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1973Ch24 
RI$weighted average: 0.58 {I18} (1999Aa03), 1.1 {I2} (1973Ch24) 
E$Not seen in {+230}Th(n,|g) (I|g<0.4). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$407.8 {I2} (1986Gi08), 407.8 {I2} (1973Ch24) in |b{+-} decay 
RI$weighted average: 8.3 {I16} (1999Aa03), 8.5 {I9} (1986Gi08), 8.5 {I12} and 9 {I4} (1973Ch24) 
M$from the Adopted dataset. 1986Gi08 reported M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 41.95 {I10} (1977Ba72), 42.1 {I1} (1975Va11), 41.96 {I15} (1974Te03), 42.1 {I2} (1971KrZH). Other: 41.96 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.122 {I14} (2018Ma03), 0.105 {I18} (1983Ba77). Others: 0.07 {I3} (1974Te03), 111 (1977Ba72), 0.030 (1975Va11), |?0.093 (1971KrZH) 
$Measured %I|g=0.070 {I8} (2018Ma03), 0.06 {I1} (1983Ba77) 
TI$From |g-ray transition intensity balance and I|a feeding the 42 level 
M,MR$From I(|g+ce) and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1977Ba72. Other: 54.1 (1975Va11, in coincidence data, see also possible placement from 275 level) 
RI$0.028 {I9} (2018Ma03). Other: 0.052 for 54.25+54.1 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.016 {I5} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1974Te03. Others: 96.2 (1977Ba72), 96.1 (1975Va11, in |a|g-coin) 
RI$0.222 {I12} (2017Le03). Other: 0.16 {I2} (1974Te03) 
$Measured %I|g=0.128 {I7} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ba72. Other: 120.0 (1975Va11, in coincidence data) 
RI$0.038 {I17} (2018Ma03). Other: 0.045 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.022 {I10} (2018Ma03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of E|g=143.768 {I3} (1984He12, 143.78 {I2} in 1974HeYW from the same lab); 143.75 {I5} (1977Ba72); 143.77 {I2} (1975Va11); 143.753 {I8} (1974Te03); 143.764 {I2} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 143.76 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 19.00 {I28} (2018Ma03), 18.80 {I24} (2017Le03), 19.06 {I35} (1996Ru11), 19.3 {I11} (1992Li05), 19.25 {I14} (1984He12, 18.0 {I9} in 1974HeYW), 19.50 {I27} (1983Ol01), 18.67 {I35} (1983Ba77), 18.96 {I35} (1982Va04), 19.4 {I20} (1975Va11), 19.6 {I20} (1974Te03) Others: 17.37 (1977Ba72); I(|g+ce)(144)/I(|g+ce)(186)=0.202 (1999Yu01) 
$Measured %I|g=10.87 {I16} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 11.0 {I4}, 10.64 {I26}, 10.9 {I4} and 10.92 {I13}), 10.83 {I14} (2017Le03), 10.9 {I2} (1996Ru11), 10.99 {I61} (1992Li05), 11.01 {I8} (1984He12), 10.93 {I15} (1983Ol01), 10.7 {I2} (1983Ba77), 10.9 {I2} (1982Va04). Other: 13.39 {I6} (2006Al28) is discrepant due to contribution from other activities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of E|g=185.722 {I4} (1984He12, 185.718 {I10} in 1974HeYW from the same lab); 185.65 {I5} (1977Ba72); 185.72 {I2} (1975Va11); 185.712 {I10} (1974Te03); 185.712 {I1} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 185.71 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 100.0 {I12} (2018Ma03), 100.0 {I12} (2017Le03), 100.0 {I35} (1999Ch12), 100.00 {I35} (1996Ru11), 100.0 {I23} (1992Li05), 100.0 {I9} (1984He12, 100 {I5} in 1974HeYW), 100.0 {I14} (1983Ol01), 100.0 {I10} (1983Ba77), 100.0 {I16} (1982Va04). Others: 100 (1977Ba72), 100 (1975Va11), 100.0 (1974Te03) 
$Measured %I|g=57.2 {I7} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 58.3 {I21}, 57.32 {I29}, 57.6 {I21} and 56.6 {I7}), 57.6 {I7} (2017Le03), 58 {I2} (1999Ch12), 57.2 {I2} (1996Ru11), 56.8 {I13} (1992Li05), 57.2 {I5} (1984He12), 56.1 {I8} (1983Ol01), 57.3 {I6} (1983Ba77), 57.5 {I9} (1982Va04). Weighted average of these values is 57.2 {I6}, with uncertainty increased to 1% in 1983Ol01. Others: 80.19 {I4} (2006Al28, discrepant due to contribution from other activities e.g. {+226}Ra decay), 54.9 {I15} (1966Ga03, scintillation detector) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ba72. Other: 19.59 (1975Va11, in coincidence data). 
TI$from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 185, 205 levels. Other value of 90% {i6} in 1999Yu01, and I(|g+ce)(19.6)/I(|g+ce)(205)=17.2, giving relative I(|g+ce)=165, inconsistent with transition intensity balance of 132 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$LWM weighted average of 109.25 {I5} (1977Ba72), 109.25 {I5} (1975Va11), 109.145 {I10} (1974Te03), 109.12 {I5} (1974HeYW). Regular weighted average is 109.152 {I16}, with reduced |h{+2}=2.86 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.6 at 95% confidence level. Other: 109.17 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average: 3.18 {I30} (2018Ma03), 2.74 {I15} (2017Le03), 3.15 {I11} (1996Ru11), 3.82 {I30} (1992Li05), 2.67 {I9} (1983Ba77), 2.59 {I37} (1975Va11), 3.1 {I3} (1974Te03), 2.77 {I40} (1974HeYW). Others: 3.82 {I30} (1992Li05) seems high and 1.799 (1977Ba72) seems low. Including the value from 1992Li05 gives weighted average of 2.89 {I11}, but with reduced |h{+2}=3.5 compared to critical |h{+2}=2.0 at 95% confidence level. Other: 1.799 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=1.82 {I17} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 1.59 {I7}, 1.84 {I30} and 2.09 {I16}), 1.58 {I8} (2017Le03), 1.80 {I6} (1996Ru11), 2.17 {I17} (1992Li05), 1.53 {I5} (1983Ba77). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 163.357 {I3} (1984He12, 163.363 {I10} in 1974HeYW from the same lab); 163.25 {I5} (1977Ba72); 163.36 {I2} (1975Va11); 163.349 {I9} (1974Te03); 163.358 {I2} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 163.35 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 8.99 {I14} (2018Ma03), 8.57 {I12} (2017Le03), 8.90 {I9} (1996Ru11), 8.77 {I21} (1992Li05), 8.95 {I7} (1984He12, 8.52 {I55} in 1974HeYW), 9.04 {I14} (1983Ol01), 8.67 {I17} (1983Ba77), 8.70 {I17} (1982Va04), 8.9 {I9} (1975Va11), 8.74 {I90} (1974Te03). Other: 7.28 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=5.14 {I8} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 5.20 {I19}, 5.15 {I13}, 5.13 {I25} and 5.11 {I7}), 4.94 {I7} (2017Le03), 5.09 {I5} (1996Ru11), 4.98 {I12} (1992Li05), 5.12 {I4} (1984He12), 5.07 {I8} (1983Ol01), 4.97 {I10} (1983Ba77), 5.0 {I1} (1982Va04). Other: 6.75 {I3} (2006Al28) is discrepant due to contribution from other activities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 205.318 {I4} (1984He12, 205.311 {I12} in 1974HeYW from the same lab); 205.25 {I5} (1977Ba72); 205.31 {I2} (1975Va11); 205.312 {I10} (1974Te03); 205.309 {I2} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 205.30 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 8.81 {I14} (2018Ma03), 8.88 {I12} (2017Le03), 8.81 {I9} (1996Ru11), 8.77 {I25} (1992Li05), 8.67 {I9} (1984He12, 9.08 {I55} in 1974HeYW), 8.97 {I16} (1983Ol01), 8.81 {I9} (1983Ba77), 8.70 {I35} (1982Va04), 8.7 {I9} (1975Va11), 8.55 {I70} (1974Te03). Other: 9.65 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=5.04 {I8} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 5.08 {I19}, 5.06 {I12}, 5.08 {I23} and 5.00 {I7}), 5.11 {I7} (2017Le03), 5.04 {I5} (1996Ru11), 4.98 {I14} (1992Li05), 4.96 {I5} (1984He12), 5.03 {I9} (1983Ol01), 5.05 {I5} (1983Ba77), 5.0 {I2} (1982Va04). Other: 7.74 {I4} (2006Al28) is discrepant due to contribution from other activities 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 221.40 {I5} (1977Ba72), 221.38 {I2} (1975Va11), 221.397 {I25} (1974Te03), 221.375 {I30} (1974HeYW), 221.399 {I1} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 221.40 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.192 {I14} (2018Ma03), 0.206 {I34} (2017Le03), 0.199 {I11} (1983Ba77), 0.204 {I19} (1975Va11), 0.21 {I5} (1974Te03), 0.22 {I2} (1974HeYW). Other: 0.219 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.110 {I8} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 0.117 {I5} and 0.101 {I10}), 0.119 {I20} (2017Le03), 0.114 {I6} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$E2 admixture is possible but less likely as it would imply intensity balance issues at the 236.9 level 
E$weighted average of 31.60 {I5} (1977Ba72), 31.59 {I14} (1975Va11), 31.50 {I20} (1974Te03), 31.6 {I1} (1971KrZH) 
RI$0.08 {I3} from unweighted average of 0.138 {I16} (2018Ma03), 0.074 {I9} (1975Va11), and 0.03 {I1} (1974Te03). Other: 0.080 (1977Ba72). Note a large difference between different measurements 
$Measured %I|g=0.079 {I9} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 51.20 {I5} (1977Ba72), 51.7 {I4} (1975Va11), 51.20 {I10} (1974Te03). Other: 51.2 (1971KrZH) 
RI$from 1975Va11. Others: 0.019 {I9} (2018Ma03), 0.029 (1977Ba72), 0.007 {I3} (1974Te03). Value from 1975Va11 is preferred as it gives a better intensity balance at the 236.9 level 
$Measured %I|g=0.010 {I5} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 75.02 {I5} (1975Va11), 74.76 {I20} (1974Te03), 74.92 {I3} (1974HeYW). Others: 74.56 {I5} (1977Ba72, unresolved doublet); 74.91 (1983Ba77) 
RI$0.128 {I23} (2018Ma03). Others: 0.222 {I12} (2017Le03), 0.89 {I9} (1983Ba77), 0.103 for 74.56+74.25 (1977Ba72), 0.13 (1975Va11), 0.09 {I1} (1974Te03), 0.25 {I8} (1974HeYW). Values in 2017Le03 and 1983Ba77 are precise but seem too high. 
$Measured %I|g=0.073 {I13} (2018Ma03), 0.128 {I7} (2017Le03), 0.51 {I5} (1983Ba77). Values from 2017Le03 and 1983Ba77 seem too high 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 140.75 {I5} (1977Ba72), 140.80 {I8} (1975Va11), 140.758 {I20} (1974Te03), 140.75 {I10} (1974HeYW). Other: 140.75 (1983Ba77). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.392 {I25} (2018Ma03), 0.287 {I22} (2017Le03), 0.373 {I26} (1983Ba77), 0.39 {I6} (1975Va11), 0.46 {I5} (1974Te03), 0.31 {I3} (1974HeYW). Weighted average is 0.347 {I23}, but with reduced |h{+2}=3.76 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.2 at 95% confidence level. Other: 0.300 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.224 {I14} (2018Ma03), 0.165 {I13} (2017Le03), 0.214 {I15} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 194.944 {I7} (1984He12, 194.94 {I2} in 1974HeYW, same lab as 1984He12); 194.95 {I5} (1977Ba72); 194.94 {I2} (1975Va11); 194.938 {I10} (1974Te03). Other: 194.94 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 1.15 {I7} (2018Ma03), 1.178 {I31} (2017Le03), 1.066 {I35} (1996Ru11), 1.09 {I9} (1992Li05), 1.093 {I23} (1983Ba77), 1.09 {I11} (1975Va11), 1.06 {I16} (1974Te03), 1.20 {I10} (1974HeYW). Other: 1.17 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.66 {I4} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 0.635 {I24} and 0.71 {I10}), 0.678 {I18} (2017Le03), 0.61 {I2} (1996Ru11), 0.618 {I48} (1992Li05), 0.626 {I13} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 198.75 {I10} (1977Ba72), 198.88 {I6} (1975Va11), 198.898 {I15} (1974Te03), 198.91 {I6} (1974HeYW), 198.928 {I2} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 198.93 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.077 {I5} (2018Ma03), 0.082 {I11} (1983Ba77), 0.057 {I9} (1975Va11), 0.08 {I1} (1974Te03), 0.05 {I2} (1974HeYW). Others: 0.286 {I25} in 2017Le03 seems discrepant; 0.17 for 198.75+199.6 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.044 {I3} (2018Ma03), 0.165 {I14} (2017Le03), 0.047 {I6} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 240.87 {I3} (1975Va11), 240.95 {I4} (1974Te03), 240.93 {I4} (1974HeYW), 240.875 {I3} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Others: 240.75 {I5} (1977Ba72, seems discrepant, although agrees within |?2|s). Other: 240.89 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.112 {I7} (2018Ma03), 0.133 {I11} (1983Ba77), 0.11 {I3} (1974Te03), 0.14 {I3} (1974HeYW). Others: 0.175 {I10} in 2017Le03 is precise but seems discrepant; 0.156 (1977Ba72); 0.148 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.064 {I4} (2018Ma03), 0.101 {I5} (2017Le03), 0.076 {I6} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ba72. Other: 54.1 (1975Va11, in coincidence data, however, authors placed this |g from 96-keV level) 
RI$from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 221.4 level. Other: 0.052 for 54.1+54.25 (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 233.55 {I10} (1977Ba72), 233.50 {I3} (1975Va11), 233.49 {I3} (1974Te03), 233.53 {I4} (1974HeYW), 233.469 {I3} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal). Other: 233.50 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.056 {I4} (2018Ma03), 0.051 {I9} (1983Ba77), 0.056 {I37} (1975Va11), 0.06 {I2} (1974Te03), 0.075 {I10} (1974HeYW). Other: 0.056 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.032 {I2} (2018Ma03), 0.029 {I5} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) data in 1987Wh01. Others: for 275 doublet from {+235}U decay: 275.50 {I5} (1977Ba72), 275.24 {I20} (1975Va11), 275.35 {I15} (1974Te03), 275.4 {I1} (1971KrZH), 
RI$from I|g(275.428)/I|g(233.469)=0.25 {I6} in (n,|g) (1987Wh01). Others for 275|g doublet from {+235}U decay: 0.0559 {I35} (2018Ma03), 0.164 {I9} (2017Le03), 0.09 {I1} (1974Te03), 0.200 (1977Ba72), 0.056 (1975Va11), |?0.074 (1971KrZH). Total intensity for the 275 doublet deduced on the basis of branching ratios is 0.056 {I20}, almost in perfect agreement with values from 2018Ma03, 1975Va11 and 1971KrZH, but in disagreement with values from 2017Le03 and 1977Ba72 
$Measured %I|g=0.032 {I2} (2018Ma03), 0.094 {I5} (2017Le03) for 275|g doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$from coincidence data in 1975Va11. 
RI$intensity balance issues at 277.6 level do not permit estimating intensity of 41.1-keV |g ray. It is probably a weak |g transition 
CC$for assumed uncertainty of 0.2 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from coincidence data in 1975Va11. Others: 72.74 (1983Ba77) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.481 {I32} (2018Ma03), 0.591 {I32} (2017Le03). Others: 0.89 {I9} (1983Ba77, seems too large); 0.20 (1975Va11, seems too low). Weighted average is the same, but reduced |h{+2}=5.9 is high. Note that, based on intensity balance at the 277.6 level, assuming negligible intensity for 41.1 transition, the measured photon intensity is much too large by a factor of |?4 with the expected relative intensity of 0.14. 
$Measured %I|g=0.275 {I18} (2018Ma03), 0.341 {I18} (2017Le03), 0.51 {I5} (1983Ba77). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 115.45 {I5} (1977Ba72), 115.5 {I2} (1975Va11), 115.2 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0442 {I5} (2017Le03), 0.057 {I20} (1975Va11). Others: 0.21 {I5} (1974HeYW, seems too high), 0.030 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0255 {I3} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g) data in 1987Wh01. Others: for 275 doublet from {+235}U decay: 275.50 {I5} (1977Ba72), 275.24 {I20} (1975Va11), 275.35 {I15} (1974Te03), 275.4 {I1} (1971KrZH), 
RI$from I|g(275.129)/I|g(317.062)=21.7 {I54} in (n,|g) (1987Wh01). uncertainty of 25% is assumed in I|g for 317.1|g by the evaluators. Others for 275|g doublet from {+235}U decay: 0.0559 {I35} (2018Ma03), 0.164 {I9} (2017Le03), 0.09 {I1} (1974Te03), 0.200 (1977Ba72), 0.056 (1975Va11), |?0.074 (1971KrZH). Total intensity for the 275 doublet deduced on the basis of branching ratios is 0.056 {I20}, almost in perfect agreement with values from 2018Ma03, 1975Va11 and 1971KrZH, but in disagreement with values from 2017Le03 and 1977Ba72 
$Measured %I|g=0.032 {I2} (2018Ma03), 0.094 {I5} (2017Le03) for 275|g doublet 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 317.10 {I8} (1975Va11), and 317.062 {I12} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal spectrometer) 
RI$from 1975Va11. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 228.7 {I1} (1977Ba72), 228.78 {I5} (1975Va11), 228.8 {I1} (1974HeYW), 228.785 {I6} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0117 {I18} (2018Ma03) and 0.015 {I5} (1974HeYW). Others: 0.002 (1977Ba72), 0.013 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0067 {I10} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 283.0 {I1} (1977Ba72), 282.92 {I5} (1975Va11), 283.1 {I2} (1971KrZH). |g not seen in (n,|g) (1987Wh01) 
RI$arithmetic mean of 0.007 (1977Ba72), 0.011 (1975Va11), 0.0056 (1971KrZH). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1977Ba72. Other: 136.6 (1975Va11, in coincidence data) 
RI$0.0447 {I27} (2017Le03). Other: 0.020 (1977Ba72). 
$Measured %I|g=0.0258 {i15} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Va11. Other: 173.4 {I1} (1974HeYW), where uncertainty appears underestimated, as with 0.1 keV uncertainty, the fit is poor as indicated by large |h{+2} in the least-squares fitting procedure. 
E$weighted average of 173.0 {I10} (1975Va11), 173.4 {I1} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.011 {I9} (1975Va11), 0.03 {I1} (1974HeYW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 281.42 {I5} (1975Va11), 281.441 {I9} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved-crystal) 
RI$from 1975Va11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Va11 
RI$0.0093 {I17} (2018Ma03). Other: 0.013 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0053 {I10} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Va11 
RI$0.0125 {I11} (2017Le03). Other: 0.13 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0072 {I6} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 150.85 {I5} (1977Ba72), 150.94 {I3} (1975Va11), 150.939 {I20} (1974Te03), 150.96 {I3} (1974HeYW). Other: 150.95 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.135 {I16} (2018Ma03), 0.084 {I23} (2017Le03), 0.115 {I17} (1983Ba77), 0.141 {I19} (1975Va11), 0.14 {I2} (1974Te03), 0.20 {I5} (1974HeYW). Other: 0.129 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.076 {I9} (2018Ma03), 0.048 {I13} (2017Le03), 0.066 {I10} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 182.60 {I5} (1977Ba72), 182.7 {I2} (1975Va11), 182.65 {I15} (1974Te03), 182.72 {I20} (1974HeYW), 182.500 {I8} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved crystal). Other: 182.57 (1983Ba77) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.68 {I7} (2018Ma03), 0.750 {I25} (2017Le03), 0.75 {I9} (1996Ru11), 0.592 {I30} (1983Ba77), 0.78 {I17} (1975Va11), 0.74 {I25} (1974Te03), 0.74 {I7} (1974HeYW). Weighted average is 0.69 {I3}, but reduced |h{+2}=2.95 is larger than critical |h{+2}=2.10. Others: 1.41 {I18} in 1992Li05 is too high; 0.546 (1977Ba72); I(|g+ce)(183)/I(|g+ce)(202)=0.28 {I4}, as stated in text of 1999Yu01, which disagrees with 0.45 from several other measurements 
$Measured %I|g=0.39 {I4} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 0.367 {I15} and 0.47 {I13}), 0.432 {I14} (2017Le03), 0.43 {I5} (1996Ru11), 0.80 {I10} (1992Li05), 0.339 {I17} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 202.106 {I6} (1984He12, 202.13 {I3} in 1974HeYW, from the same lab); 202.05 {I5} (1977Ba72); 202.12 {I2} (1975Va11), 202.105 {I12} (1974Te03); 202.111 {I3} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved crystal). Other: 202.11 (1983Ba77) 
RI$unweighted average of 1.85 {I5} (2018Ma03), 2.062 {I42} (2017Le03), 1.85 {I7} (1996Ru11), 2.04 {I12} (1992Li05), 1.885 {I35} (1983Ba77), 1.87 {I19} (1975Va11), 1.88 {I20} (1974Te03), 1.54 {I10} (1974HeYW). Regular weighted average is 1.91 {I5}, but reduced |h{+2}=4.4 as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.0. Other: 2.19 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=1.06 {I3} (2018Ma03, power moderated mean (PMM) of 1.07 {I4}, 1.06 {I12}, 1.08 {I11} and 1.051 {I24}), 1.187 {I24} (2017Le03), 1.06 {I4} (1996Ru11), 1.16 {I7} (1992Li05), 1.08 {I2} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 291.65 {I5} (1977Ba72), 291.65 {I3} (1975Va11), 291.58 {I15} (1974Te03), 291.6 {I1} (1971KrZH) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.0477 {I33} (2018Ma03), 0.0733 {I44} (2017Le03), 0.07 {I1} (1974Te03). Weighted average is 0.058 {I9}, but reduced |h{+2}=11.6 is too high. Others: 0.167 (1977Ba72), 0.056 (1975Va11), |?0.037 (1971KrZH). 
$Measured %I|g=0.0273 {I19} (2018Ma03), 0.0422 {I25} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 345.90 {I5} (1977Ba72), 345.93 {I3} (1975Va11), 345.84 {I15} (1974Te03). Other: 345.91 (1971KrZH) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.066 {I5} (2018Ma03), 0.0431 {I32} (2017Le03), 0.07 {I1} (1974Te03). Regular weighted average is 0.051 {I8}, but reduced |h{+2}=9.5 is too high. Others: 0.13 (1975Va11), 0.126 for 345.4+345.9 (1977Ba72), 0.0030 (1971KrZH). 
$Measured %I|g=0.038 {I3} (2018Ma03), 0.0248 {I18} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 387.85 {I10} (1977Ba72), 387.84 {I3} (1975Va11), 387.79 {I15} (1974Te03). Other: 387.85 (1971KrZH) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0455 {I35} (2018Ma03), 0.0488 {I45} (2017Le03), 0.07 {I1} (1974Te03). Others: 0.278 (1977Ba72), 0.015 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.026 {I2} (2018Ma03), 0.0281 {I26} (2017Le03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1977Ba72 
TI$deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance. Other: I|g=0.031 (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 215.30 {I10} (1977Ba72), 215.28 {I5} (1975Va11), 215.26 {I20} (1974Te03), 215.31 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0524 {I35} (2018Ma03), 0.050 {I6} (1975Va11), 0.05 {I1} (1974Te03), 0.050 {I15} (1974HeYW, 0.74 in 1971KrZH seems erroneous). Other: 0.044 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.030 {I2} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 246.85 {I5} (1977Ba72), 246.84 {I2} (1975Va11), 246.59 {I10} (1974Te03), 246.83 {I4} (1974HeYW). Other: 246.87 (1983Ba77) 
RI$weighted average of 0.084 {I5} (2018Ma03), 0.093 {I5} (1983Ba77), 0.08 {I3} (1974Te03), 0.11 {I3} (1974HeYW). Others: 0.15 (1975Va11), 0.117 for 246.85+251.5 (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.048 {I3} (2018Ma03), 0.053 {I3} (1983Ba77) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 266.50 {I5} (1975Va11), 266.40 {I10} (1974Te03), 266.44 {I8} (1971KrZH) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0117 {I18} (2018Ma03), 0.011 {I3} (1974Te03). Others: 0.017 (1975Va11), 0.0093 (1971KrZH) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0067 {I10} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Va11. Other: 356.0 {I2} (1971KrZH) 
RI$0.0042 {I14} (2018Ma03). Other: 0.0093 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0024 {I8} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from 1975Va11. Other: 410.2 {I2} (1971KrZH) 
RI$0.0040 {I11} (2018Ma03). Other: 0.0056 (1975Va11) 
$Measured %I|g=0.0023 {I6} (2018Ma03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E0(+E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$from (n,|g) (1987Wh01). Intensity from I|g(429)/I|g(448)=1.2 {I7} in 1987Wh01 
$|a(exp)=1.33(|a(K)exp=0.66 {I4} in (n,|g), 1987Wh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 448.40 {I6} (1975Va11), 448.339 {I18} (1987Wh01, (n,|g), curved crystal). Other: 447.5 {I2} (1971KrZH) 
RI$from 1975Va11 
$Placement based on (n,|g) (1987Wh01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from Table A{-4} in 1993AcZZ. Other: 228.8 in author's Fig. 17 
$I|g: 112 {I9}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 96.1|g, 9/2+|)5/2+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g: 167 {I6}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 120.5|g, 11/2+|)7/2+); 220 {I14}, gate: ce(L{-3}, 120.5|g, 11/2+|)7/2+); 159 {I14}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 96.1|g, 9/2+|)5/2+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g: 53.8 {I59}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 120.5|g, 11/2+|)7/2+); 31.1 {I57}, gate: ce(L{-3}, 120.5|g, 11/2+|)7/2+); 100 {I12}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 96.1|g, 9/2+|)5/2+); 4.4 {I9}, gate: ce(M, 96.1|g, 9/2+|)5/2+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g: 53.8 {I59}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 120.5|g, 11/2+|)7/2+); 51.8 {I69}, gate: ce(L{-3}, 120.5|g, 11/2+|)7/2+); 69 {I10}, gate: ce(L{-2}, 96.1|g, 9/2+|)5/2+); 2.8 {I8}, gate: ce(M, 96.1|g, 9/2+|)5/2+) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E0/E2=17 {I6} 
B(E2)(W.u.): the ratio of B(E2)'s to 0+ and 2+ of the g.s. band is much larger than the Alaga ratio 0.70 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
B(E2)(W.u.): the ratio of B(E2)'s to 0+ and 2+ of g.s. band is only half as large as the Alaga ratio of 0.70; possibly due to admixture with the 2+ level of the |b band at 774 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$from light-ion Coul. ex. and I|g(774.1 |g) most of the 612.0-keV I|g intensity deexcites the 774.4-keV jp=3- state, and not the 774.1- keV J|p=2+ state as suggested by 1986Gi08. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
From comparison of cross sections of (n,n') and (n,n'|g) of 1982TaZR it appears that I(|g+ce)(730 E0)|?I|g(680.9). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
I|g(612)/I|g(774)=9.5 {i24} (1984BlZS); from Coul. ex. evaluator concludes that >90% of I|g(612|g) comes from the 774.4-keV (J|p=3-) level, and <10% from the 774.1-keV (J|p=2+) level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ level-energy difference=584.3 
RI$<4.2 {I3} in table 2 of 2008De28, but only one placement according to authors' tables 1 and 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Ice(L1)=2.0 {I6} and |a(L1)=28.0 {I12}. 
M,MR$from L- and M-subshell ratios 
$Ice(L1)=2.0 {I6}, Ice(L2)=0.92 {I28}, Ice(L3)=1.5 {I5} (doublet, uncorrected intensity), Ice(M1)=0.57 {I12}, Ice(M2)=0.46 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
MR$deduced by 1979Je01 from their data; the given ce intensities of Ice(L3)=0.76 {I42}, Ice(M3)=0.34 {I11} alone are not sufficient to deduced the E2/M1 admixture. 
$0.0018|<I|g<0.018 from Ice(L3)=0.76 {I42} and 43.5<|a(L3)|<432. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Ice(L3)=5.8 {I11} and |a(L3)=68.0. 
$Ice(L2)=5.7 {I12}, Ice(L3)=5.8 {I11}, Ice(M2)=1.8 {I3}, Ice(M3)=1.6 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1(+E2))
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Ice(M1)=0.32 {I9} and |a(M1)=9.7 {I3}. 
MR$deduced by 1979Je01 from their data; only information given is the intensity of M1-ce line which is not sufficient to deduce the E2/M1 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Ice(L3)=0.55 {I10}, Ice(L2)=0.79 {I15} and |a(L3)=12.4, |a(L2)=16.1. 
$ Ice(M2)=0.15 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Ice(L1)=0.79 {I17} and |a(L1)=14.0. 
$Ice(L1)=0.79 {I17}, Ice(L2)=0.16 {I6}, Ice(M1)=0.25 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$E2 from |a(K)exp=0.012 listed by 1979Je01; however, E1 was assigned by them, and the level scheme also suggests the same. The I(ce) intensity given could be a misprint. 
$Ice(K)=0.017 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Measured Ice: K:L1:L2:M1=0.26 {I6}:0.135 {I21}:0.015 {I6}:0.030 {I5}. 
RI$no photon intensity for this transition was listed by 1979Je01; however, 60% E0, 40% M1(+E2) admixture was deduced, presumably from their Ice and unlisted I|g. The listed I|g(704.978|g) might be I|g(704.978|g)+I|g(705.158|g). I(|g+ce)=0.52 shown on their decay scheme yields I|g|?0.11. 
$Ice(K)=0.26 {I5}, Ice(L1)=0.135 {I20}, Ice(L2)=0.015 {I6}, Ice(M1)=0.030 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1
decay_comment:
CC$from the measured Ice(K), Ice(L1) and I|g. 
M$The E0 admixture is 47 % {I12}, if E2 admixture is negligible. 
$Ice(K)=0.36 {I5}, Ice(L1)=0.076 {I11}, Ice(M1)=0.016 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$may include I|g(705.158|g); in this case, if I|g(705.158|g) is |?0.11, then I|g(704.978|g)|?0.34. 
TI$from 1979Je01, as shown on their decay scheme. 
$1979Je01 deduced E0 contribution as 60%. 
$Ice(K)=0.37 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.024 {I5}. 
M$if probable E2 contribution is ignored, then E0 admixture is about 17%. 1979Je01 deduced 20%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.156 {I25}, Ice(L1)=0.037 {I6}. 
M$measured I|g and I(ce) suggest an E0 admixture of about 23%, if the probable E2 admixture is ignored. 
$Ice(K)=0.156 {I25}, Ice(L1)=0.037 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from measured Ice(K)=0.023 {I5} and |a(K)=0.052. I|g(797.25)+I|g(798.08)=0.80 {i12} was measured. 
$Ice(K)=0.023 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from measured Ice(K)=0.016 {I2} and |a(K)=0.052. 
$Ice(K)=0.016 {I4}, Ice(L1)=0.009 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$Only the K line of this transition was observed with Ice(K)=0.18 {I5} 
RI$deduced from Ice(K) and |a(K)=1.08, if M1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$|a(K)exp=0.075 {I31} suggests a large E2 admixture with %E2/%M1=5.2 {I+61-28}; the uncertainty on the corresponding conversion coefficient is increased to include pure E2 multipolarity. 
$Ice(K)=0.0060 {I23} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1973Ta25 (semi). Other: 1956Al30 ((|a)(ce)). 
I|g=0.059% {I2} was measured by 1990Ko40. 
Total I(ce)=23 {I3} per 100 |a decays (1952Du12,1952Za01,1956Al30). 
M |a=359 {I65} from Ice/I|g and the measured half-life of 0.37 ns {I3} for the 49.55-keV level rule out other multipolarities. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
Transition was obscured by 112.8|g of {+232}Th (1989Ge01). E|g=113.3 {I4} was measured in {+234}Ac |b{+-} decay and E|g=113.5 {I1} in {+238}U |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$derived from rotational band properties with Harris expansion: moment of inertia vs. rotational frequency (2007Is09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1+L2)=5.0% {I5}, Ice(M1+M2)=1.6% {I2}, Ice(N+O)=0.30 {I4}. 2015Ah04 state that the high intensity of M-conversion line could be due to contribution from K-conversion line of 229.60|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1+L2)|?1.0% 
E$transition from ce spectrum. In the |g spectrum, this line was contaminated by strong Pa K{-|b2} x ray, thus its intensity could not be measured 
M$basis of assignment is stated in e-mail reply of Oct 20, 2015 from I. Ahmad as "Experimentally, since we see the 110.9-keV transition in coincidence with K-x rays, it is a fast transition, and it can only be M1, E1, or E2. It is not E2, because we do not see L3 conversion electron line. It can not be E1, because we do not see any gamma ray. So, it must be M1". 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.) from T{-1/2}=45.1 ns {I13} and |g-branching ratio. Other: 3.1|*10{+-5} {I+5-2} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
CC$experimental value of anomalous conversion coefficient (1975Ho14). 
$B(E1)(W.u.) from T{-1/2}=45.1 ns {I13} and |g-branching ratio. Other: 9.1|*10{+-7} {I+39-66} from Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=43 {I5} in (p,2n|g) for a double placement. I|g(284|g)/I|g(294|g)=0.5 {I2} in Coul. ex. where each |g is doubly placed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=69 {I11} in (p,2n|g) and 12 {I4} in Coul. ex. for a doubly placed |g. Crude estimate is <40 from the two values 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$Branching ratios for 224|g and 394|g from |g(ce)-coin data in (p,2n|g) listed in comments in that dataset. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=333 {I+38-36} 
M$from experimental B(E2), the transition is expected to be M1+E2, probably dominant M1. 
$|a(theory)=1.34|*10{+3} for M1, 4.67|*10{+5} for E2 for E|g=8.8 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=127 {I+52-28} 
E$from Fig. 4; not listed in Tables 1 and 2 
$E|g=68.5 {I6}, I|g<0.5 (1996Le01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$B(E1)(W.u.)=9.1|*10{+-7} {I+39-66} 
E$contaminated with E|g=83.780 from background line 
RI$>1.5 {I5} in Table 1 of 2003Wu03 
CC$experimental value of anomalous conversion coefficient (1975Ho14). 
$E|g=83.9 {I2}, I|g=5.1 {I6} (1996Le01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=5.3|*10{+-3} {I3}. B(E1)=2.34|*10{+-6} {I+27-16}. B(E1)(W.u.)=9.6|*10{+-5} {I+11-7} 
$E1 R.M.E.=+4.01|*10{+-3} {I+48-32}. 
$B(E1)=1.34|*10{+-6} {I+34-21}. B(E1)(W.u.)=5.5|*10{+-5} {I+14-9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.32 {I6}. B(M1)=0.0085 {I+35-29}. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0047 {I+19-16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.35 {I+9-5}. 
$Deduced I|g=0.67 {I+17-10} from B(M1)(W.u.) for 24.3|g and B(E2)(W.u.) and I|g for 115.5|g 
$In Fig. 9 of 1992De51, branching ratio of 94% (apparently I(|g+ce)) for an M1 transition of 24.3 keV to the 11/2- member of the band at 168.7 keV was calculated using rotational model, Q{-0} and (g{-K}-g{-R}) parameters. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=2.3|*10{+-3} {I4}. B(E1)=0.53|*10{+-6} {I+20-17}. B(E1)(W.u.)=2.2|*10{+-5} {I+8-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2+M1)
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.040 {I8}. B(M1)=1.6|*10{+-4} {I+7-6}. 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=25 {I5}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.9|*10{+-4} {I+4-3} 
MR$deduced by evaluators from E2 and M1 matrix elements 
$E|g=134.3 {I2}, I|g=1.6 {I2} (1996Le01), placed from 218 level only 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=14 {I+14-8} 
$Deduced I|g=3.4|*10{+-8} {I+44-23} from B(E3)(W.u.) for 108.0|g and B(E2)(W.u.) and I|g for 129.2|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=1.00 {I8}. B(M1)=0.063 {I10}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.035 {I6} 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0063 {I+15-24}. This value is low by a factor of |?6 compared to the transition probability from branching ratios. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=38 {I19} 
$I|g=7|*10{+-8} {I+17-5} deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)(143|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(253.2|g) and I|g(253.2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity of 4 {I2} between the placements from 320 and 425 levels divided by evaluators from I|g(236|g)/I|g(217|g)=0.233 {I9} in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset, using I|g(217|g)=3.8 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E.=+4.955|*10{+-3} {I+110-40}. B(E1)=1.54|*10{+-6} {I+7-3}. B(E1)(W.u.)=6.3|*10{+-5} {I+3-1} 
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=6.3|*10{+-3} {I4}. B(E1)=2.48|*10{+-6} {I+33-30}. B(E1)(W.u.)=10.2|*10{+-5} {I+14-3} 
$E|g=139.8 {I1}, I|g=36.3 {I15} (1996Le01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E4]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E4)(W.u.)=396 {I+317-198} 
$I|g=1.9|*10{+-9} {I+16-9} deduced from B(E4)(W.u.)(270.4|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(160.13|g) and I|g(160.13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.35 {I+21-5} 
$In Fig. 9 of 1992De51, branching ratio of 90% (probably I(|g+ce)) for an M1 transition of 22.8 keV to the 15/2- member of the band at 328.9 keV was theoretically calculated using rotational model, Q{-0} and (g{-K}-g{-R}) parameters. 
$I|g=0.49 {I+68-23} deduced from B(E4)(W.u.)(270.4|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(160.13|g) and I|g(160.13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=3.3|*10{+-3} {I8}. B(E1)=0.8|*10{+-6} {I4}. B(E1)(W.u.)=3.3|*10{+-5} {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=5.2|*10{+-3} {I5}. B(E1)=1.9|*10{+-6} {I+4-3}. B(E1)(W.u.)=7.8|*10{+-5} {I+16-12} 
$E|g=180.0 {I2}, I|g=1.3 {I3} (1996Le01), placed from 705 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.12 {I5}. B(M1)=0.0010 {I+11-6}. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00056 {I+62-34}. B(E2)(W.u.)=6.1 {I+29-41} 
MR$deduced by evaluators from E2 and M1 matrix elements 
$E|g=183.6 {I3}, I|g=0.6 {I2} (1996Le01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=35 {I+30-10} 
$I|g=0.4|*10{+-9} {I+6-2} deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)(63.0|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(333.5|g) and I|g(333.5) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=264 {I+150-29} 
$I|g=0.15 {I+15-4} deduced from B(E2)(W.u.)(80.2|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(333.5|g) and I|g(333.5) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=7.6 {I38} 
$I|g=3.1|*10{+-5} {I+27-18} deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)(391.9|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(333.5|g) and I|g(333.5) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=238 {I+125-179} 
$I|g=0.07 {I+22-6} deduced from B(E2)(W.u.)(90.7|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(330.9|g) and I|g(330.9|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=6 {I4} 
$I|g=0.9|*10{+-7} {I+33-7} deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)(408.5|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(330.9|g) and I|g(330.9|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=15 {I+11-6} 
$I|g=2.4|*10{+-8} {I+24-11} deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)(135.9|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(186.6|g) and I|g(186.6|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=1.25 {I8}. B(M1)=0.078 {I10}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.043 {I6}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.016 {I+3-6} from Coul. ex. matrix elements. The two values are in disagreement 
$E|g=171.3 {I2}, I|g=1.3 {I2} (1996Le01), unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.406 {I+36-31} 
$I|g=0.014 {I+4-3} deduced from B(M1)(W.u.)(7.2|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(177.96|g) and I|g(177.96|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=297 {I+144-60} 
$I|g=1.1 {I+10-4} deduced from B(E2)(W.u.)(133.2|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(356.2|g) and I|g(356.2|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E.=-0.0128 {I+32-50}. B(E1)=8|*10{+-6} {I+8-3}. B(E1)(W.u.)=3.3|*10{+-4} {I+33-12} 
$I|g=2.4 {I+24-9} deduced from B(E1)(W.u.)(48.2|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(206.9|g) and I|g(206.9|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E.=+6.03|*10{+-3} {I+13-14}. B(E1)=1.82|*10{+-6} {I9}. B(E1)(W.u.)=7.5|*10{+-5} {I4} 
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=8.0|*10{+-3} {I4}. B(E1)=3.2|*10{+-6} {I3}. B(E1)(W.u.)=1.32|*10{+-4} {I12} 
$E|g=218.7 {I1}, I|g=21.4 {I3} (1996Le01), placed from 351.5 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E4]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E4)(W.u.)=428 {I+428-238} 
$I|g=0.19|*10{+-7} {I+19-9} deduced from B(E4)(W.u.)(367.0|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(206.9|g) and I|g(206.9|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=277 {I+143-127} 
$I|g=0.42 {I+88-25} deduced from B(E2)(W.u.)(134.2|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(349.7|g) and I|g(349.7|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=21 {I8} 
$I|g=0.60|*10{+-4} {I33} deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)(465.2|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(349.7|g) and I|g(349.7|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.347 {I+12-31} 
RI$0.28 {I2} deduced by evaluators from B(M1)(W.u.)(15.8|g)/B(E2)(W.u.)(199.8|g) and I|g 
$In Fig. 9 of 1992De51, branching ratio of 51% (apparently I(|g+ce)) for an M1 transition of 15.8 keV to the 19/2- member of the band at 535.7 keV was calculated using rotational model, Q{-0} and (g{-K}-g{-R}) parameters. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=4.6 {I+22-24} 
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.12 {I6}. B(M1)=0.0008 {I+10-6}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.00045 {I+56-34} 
MR$from E2 and M1 matrix elements 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E.=-1.91|*10{+-3} {I+23-30}. B(E1)=0.20|*10{+-6} {I5}. B(E1)(W.u.)=8.2|*10{+-5} {I21} 
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=1.4|*10{+-3} {I4}. B(E1)=0.11|*10{+-6} {I+7-5}. B(E1)(W.u.)=4.5|*10{+-5} {I+29-21} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=2.4|*10{+-3} {I7}. B(E1)=0.32|*10{+-6} {I+21-16}. B(E1)(W.u.)=1.3|*10{+-5} {I+9-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=305 {I+176-130} 
RI$2.6 {I12} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(180.1|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(376.4|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=303 {I+205-54} 
RI$2.4 {I10} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(174.3|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(365.4|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E3)(W.u.)=22 {I+24-8} 
RI$0.00024 {I12} deduced by evaluators from B(E3)(W.u.)(524.1|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(365.4|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$1.7|*10{+-8} {I9} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(240.9|g)/B(E3)(W.u.)(176.9|g) 
$B(E3)(W.u.)=14 {I+9-5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=2.2 {I2}. B(M1)=0.20 {I+4-3}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.112 {I+22-17} 
$E|g=233.2 {I1}, I|g=3.5 {I4} (1996Le01), placed from 312 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$0.091 {I23} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(249.8|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(57.2|g) 
CC$assuming 1.0 keV uncertainty in E|g 
$E1 R.M.E.=-0.0155 {I+22-14}. B(E1)=1.0|*10{+-5} {I+2-3}. B(E1)(W.u.)=4.1|*10{+-5} {I+8-12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.2 (or 0.8%) in 2003Wu03 seems too low to be realistic. Evaluators assign 0.7 (or 3%), consistent with uncertainties for other strong |g rays 
$E1 R.M.E.=+7.02|*10{+-3} {I+15-11}. B(E1)=2.05|*10{+-6} {I+9-6}. B(E1)(W.u.)=8.4|*10{+-5} {I+4-3} 
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=9.4|*10{+-3} {I4}. B(E1)=3.7|*10{+-6} {I3}. B(E1)(W.u.)=1.52|*10{+-4} {I12} 
$E|g=290.7 {I2}, I|g=6.8 {I6} (1996Le01), placed from 1076 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E4]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$2.7|*10{+-8} {I20} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(249.8|g)/B(E4)(W.u.)(456.7|g) 
$B(E4)(W.u.)=475 {I+370-317}. Upper limit of B(E4)(W.u.) is higher than expected from systematics (1999Sh28) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=1.9|*10{+-3} {I5}. B(E1)=0.16|*10{+-6} {I+10-7}. B(E1)(W.u.)=6.6|*10{+-5} {I+41-29} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=2.8|*10{+-3} {I8}. B(E1)=0.36|*10{+-6} {I+23-18}. B(E1)(W.u.)=1.5|*10{+-5} {I+10-8} 
$E|g=300.5 {I3}, I|g=1.0 {I2} (1996Le01), unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(E2)(W.u.)=314 {I+162-57}. 
$I|g=3.1 {I+34-10} deduced from B(E2)(W.u.)(228.9|g)/B(E1)(W.u.)(394.5|g) and I|g(394.5) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.63 {I9}. B(M1)=0.015 {I+5-4}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0084 {I+28-23} 
$E|g=271.5 {I2}, I|g=3.6 {I5} (1996Le01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=4.8|*10{+-3} {I11}. B(E1)=0.9|*10{+-6} {I4}. B(E1)(W.u.)=3.7|*10{+-5} {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.28 {I+34-4} 
RI$0.019 {I+28-4} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(288.7|g)/B(M1)(W.u.)(17.2|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$uncertainty of 0.3 (or 1.1%) in 2003Wu03 seems too low to be realistic. Evaluators assign 0.8 (or 3%), consistent with uncertainties for other strong |g rays 
$B(E2)(W.u.)=324 {I+27-37} 
E$level-energy difference=289.78 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$level-energy difference=353.62 
$E1 R.M.E.=+8.64|*10{+-3} {I+9-148}. B(E1)=2.7|*10{+-6} {I+0-10}. B(E1)(W.u.)=1.1|*10{+-4} {I+0-4} 
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.0114 {I7}. B(E1)=4.6|*10{+-6} {I+6-5}. B(E1)(W.u.)=1.9|*10{+-4} {I+3-2} 
$E|g=352.9 {I3}, I|g=2.3 {I3} (1996Le01), unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
$M1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.7 {I2}. B(M1)=0.016 {I+11-8}. B(M1)(W.u.)=0.009 {I+6-5}. 
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0052 {I+57-16} from matrix element 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$B(M1)(W.u.)=0.28 {I+6-15}. 
RI$0.040 {I+15-23} deduced by evaluators from B(E2)(W.u.)(323.8|g)/B(M1)(W.u.)(42.6|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.0178 {I13}. B(E1)=9.9|*10{+-6} {I+15-14}. B(E1)(W.u.)=4.1|*10{+-4} {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$445.9 in Fig. 4 of 2003Wu03 
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.018 {I4}. B(E1)=9|*10{+-6} {I4}. B(E1)(W.u.)=3.7|*10{+-4} {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E1 R.M.E. (from branching ratios)=0.025 {I9}. B(E1)=1.6|*10{+-5} {I+13-10}. B(E1)(W.u.)=6.6|*10{+-4} {I+54-41} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=5.4 {I15} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 2.0 {I6} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 0.7 {I2} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=16 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 7.8 {I23} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 2.1 {I6} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.6 {I5} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=80 {I8} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 23.6 {I24} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 3.3 {I10} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I|g=16 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 4.2 {I12} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 1.0 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 0.4 {I1} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=12 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$173.2 {I6} in 1996Le01, unplaced 
$I|g=9 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 1.2 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 0.4 {I1} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=40 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.2 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$E|g=218.2 {I2}, E1 in 1996Le01, unplaced 
$I|g=41 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 39 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 1.8 {I6} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.8 {I6} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 
$I|g(50|')/I|g(90|')=1.21 {I7} (1992De51, |g unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$total intensity of 1.3 {I1} between the placements from 320 and 425 levels divided by evaluators from I|g(236|g)/I|g(217|g)=0.233 {I9} in the Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g<0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.6 {I5} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=100 {I10} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 100 {I10} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 8.6 {I26} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 
$I|g(50|')/I|g(90|')=1.00 {I4} (1992De51), normalized to 1.0 for |DJ=2, E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=233.5 {I4} in 1996Le01, unplaced 
$I|g=3.2 {I9} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 1.0 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 0.6 {I2} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$E|g=253.2 {I3} in 1996Le01, unplaced. 
$I|g=25 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 1.2 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.4 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g=30 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 12.2 {I25} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 12.0 {I24} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 0.8 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g=68 {I7} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 67 {I7} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)) 
$I|g(50|')/I|g(90|')=1.22 {I7} (1992De51, |g unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=20 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 19.8 {I40} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 19.8 {I40} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)) 
$I|g(50|')/I|g(90|')=0.98 {I5} (1992De51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g<0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), <0.4 (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 0.9 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
$I|g=14 {I3} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 14.5 {I29} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 13.0 {I26} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)) 
$I|g(50|')/I|g(90|')=1.09 {I7} (1992De51) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
$I|g=21 {I2} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 22.0 {I22} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 21.4 {I22} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)) 
$I|g(50|')/I|g(90|')=1.50 {I8} (1992De51, |g unplaced) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=3.4 {I10} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 1.8 {I6} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.8 {I6} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=4 {I1} (coin with ce(L2)(59|g)), 3.3 {I10} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.7 {I5} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$I|g=1.6 {I5} (coin with ce(L2)(110|g)), 2.4 {I7} (coin with ce(L2)(160|g)), 1.2 {I4} (coin with ce(L2)(207|g)) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas 
TI$from intensity balance at 9.2 level 
$|a(theory)=845 for M1, 2.65|*10{+5} for E2, with assumed uncertainty of 0.1 keV in transition energy. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0024 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 58.54 {I5} (1977Ba72), 58.57 {I2} (1975Ho14), 58.47 {I5} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 7.2 {I7} (1973Br12), 7.4 {I3} (1975Ho14), 6.8 {I2} (1999Ch12), 6.5 {I4} (2017Le03). Other: 8.75 {I8} (1977Ba72). 
$Measured %I|g=0.452 {I25} (2017Le03) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L1+L2)=31.4, Ice(L3)=24.4, Ice(M1+M2)=8.0, Ice(M3)=6.4, Ice(N)=3.5, Ice(O)=0.9 (1975Ho14). Others: 1966TrZZ, Ice(L)=50% (1960As02), agrees with data in 1975Ho14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$|g from 1975Ho14 only 
RI$weighted average: 0.088 {I4} (1999Ch12), 0.088 {I22} (1975Ho14) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L1+L2)=0.18, Ice(L3)=0.14 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 25.64 {I5} (1977Ba72), 25.65 {I2} (1975Va11), 25.64 {I2} (1975Ho14). Others: 25.509 {I9} (1984He12; fits poorly in the decay scheme); 25.6 {I1} (1956Ph61) 
RI$weighted average: 202 {I20} (1973Br12), 228 {I15} (1975Ho14), 210 {I10} (1999Ch12), 200.3 {I26} (2017Le03). Other: 331.9 {I6} (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=13.95 {I18} (2017Le03), 14.5 {I3} (1982Va04), 12.5 {I2} (1960As02). Other: %I|g=5.8 {I6}, relative to %I|g=54% for 185.7|g from the decay of {+235}U (1975Va11) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L3)=23.6, Ice(M1+M2)=6.6, Ice(M3)=5.0, Ice(M4+M5)=2.6, Ice(N)=3.9, Ice(O)=0.7 (1975Ho14) 
$M-subshell ratios are quoted by 1960As02 from 1957Ho07 also 1961Ho29) (first set from {+231}Th, second set from {+231}U) and from 1957Ju30 (from {+231}Th decay). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0013 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 84.221 {I4} (1984He12), 84.16 {I5} (1977Ba72), 84.21 {I2} (1975Ho14) 
RI$100 (1973Br12), 100 (1973Te06), 100 (1975Ho14), 100 (1977Ba72), 100 (1999Ch12), 100 {I5} (2017Le03). 
$Measured %I|g=6.98 {I36} (2017Le03), 6.60 {I25} (1999Ch12), 6.84 {I10} (1984He12), 6.6 {I3} (1982Va04). Other: 7.2 {I10} (1960As02) 
CC$from sum of measured conversion coefficients from 1975Ho14. as the E1 transition of 84.2 keV has been found to be anomalous with much larger L1 and L2 conversion coefficients as compared to theoretical values form BrIcc code. 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L1)=6.93, Ice(L2)=4.25, Ice(L3)=0.27, Ice(M)=3.68, Ice(N)=0.83, Ice(O)=0.22 (1975Ho14) 
$From BrIcc code, |a(L)0.1434 {I20}, |a(M)=0.0350 {I5}, |a(N)=0.00925 {I13}, 
$L-subshell ratios are quoted by 1960As02 from 1961Ho29 (first L1/L2 from {+231}Th, second from {+231}U) and from 1957Ju30 (from {+231}Th decay). 
M$this transition is anomalously converted with a factor of 12.8 {I21} for |a(L1)exp and |a(L2)exp, while |a(L3)exp agrees with theory (1960As02). See also 1970Gr36 and 2008Go10 for an analysis of the anomalous E1 character of this transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$4.1 {I14} from I(|g+ce) and |a 
E$from level-energy difference 
TI$44 {I15} per 100 decays (1975Ho14), from ce and x-ray data, converted to intensity relative to 100 for I|g(84.2|g) 
CC$assuming 0.1 keV uncertainty in E|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 42.80 {I5} (1977Ba72), 42.86 {I7} (1975Ho14), 42.80 {I6} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.87 {I10} (1973Br12), 0.89 {I6} (1975Ho14), 0.89 {I2} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.469 {i19} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference 
$Theoretical |a(M3)=0.74 for M1 and 4683 for E2 
E$transition seen in ce spectrum 1975Ho14. In |g data, value is listed as %I|g|<0.33 implying relative I|g|<4.9 
TI$20 {I7} per 100 decays (1975Ho14), from ce and x-ray data, converted to intensity relative to 100 for I|g(84.2|g) 
RI$1.4 {I5} from I(|g+ce) and |a 
CC$assuming 0.1 keV uncertainty in E|g 
M$from ce measurements (1975Ho14). Authors give %E2 as 2 {I+5-1} implying |d(E2/M1)=0.14 {I+12-4}. Using |a(M3)exp=8 {I+8-0} i.e. assuming 100% uncertainty on the lower limit, evaluators deduce |d(E2/M1)=0.040 {I+18-0}, inconsistent with |d=0.14 {I+12-4} from 1975Ho14 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$others: 93.0 {I1} (1973Br12), 92.91 {I10} (1973Te06) 
RI$unweighted average: 0.50 {I5} (1973Br12), 0.9 {I2} (1973Te06), 0.69 {I8} (1975Ho14), 0.71 {I8} (1999Ch12). 
M$1973Br12 deduced |a(L)exp and probable E1 multipolarity for for the 93.0 transition, based on |a(L)exp for the 102.3 transition and its (E1) multipolarity (1965Ho13), and relative intensities of the 93.3- and 102.1-keV |g rays from their coincidence and singles measurements, 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0013 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 102.23 {I5} (1977Ba72), 102.27 {I2} (1975Ho14), 102.30 {I5} (1973Br12), 102.32 {I4} (1973Te06) 
RI$weighted average: 6.7 {I7} (1973Br12), 6.8 {I4} (1973Te06), 6.3 {I5} (1975Ho14), 6.6 {I2} (1999Ch12). Others: 4.62 {I25} (2017Le03, seems discrepant), 5.42 {I8} (1977Ba72). 
$Measured %I|g=0.322 {I17} (2017Le03) seems discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0025 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 72.70 {I5} (1977Ba72), 72.78 {I2} (1975Ho14), 72.66 {I6} (1973Br12), 72.74 {I5} (1973Te06) 
RI$weighted average: 4.0 {I4} (1973Br12), 3.8 {I2} (1973Te06), 3.86 {I23} (1975Ho14), 3.8 {I1} (1999Ch12). Other: 4.05 {I6} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 89.94 {I5} (1977Ba72), 89.95 {I2} (1975Ho14), 89.94 {I5} (1973Br12), 89.95 {I4} (1973Te06) 
RI$weighted average: 15.3 {I15} (1973Br12), 15.3 {I8} (1973Te06), 14.5 {I9} (1975Ho14), 15.0 {I5} (1999Ch12). Other: 13.25 {I12} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 115.5 {I2} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.015 {I3} (1975Ho14), 0.015 {I4} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.04 {I1} (1973Br12). In 1977Ba72, I|g mixed with sum line 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 164.70 {I10} (1977Ba72), 164.94 {I10} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.06 {I3} (1973Br12), 0.060 {I6} (1975Ho14), 0.051 {I2} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.200 {I11} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$others: 174.1 {I10} (1977Ba72), 174.19 {I8} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.31 {I3} (1973Br12), 0.278 {I17} (1975Ho14), 0.26 {I1} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.704 {I21} for doublet (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0014 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 81.16 {I5} (1977Ba72), 81.24 {I2} (1975Ho14), 81.18 {I5} (1973Br12), 81.20 {I6} (1973Te06) 
RI$weighted average: 14.2 {I14} (1973Br12), 13.5 {I9} (1973Te06), 13.7 {I8} (1975Ho14), 13.5 {I5} (1999Ch12), 12.15 {I66} (2017Le03). Other: 11.69 {I10} (1977Ba72). 
$Measured %I|g=0.849 {I45} (2017Le03) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L1)=4.2, Ice(M)=1.1 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0014 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 82.02 {I5} (1977Ba72), 82.11 {I2} (1975Ho14), 82.02 {I6} (1973Br12), 82.06 {I7} (1973Te06) 
RI$NRM weighted average: 7.2 {I7} (1973Br12), 6.8 {I4} (1973Te06), 6.2 {I5} (1975Ho14), 6.0 {I3} (1999Ch12), 5.07 {I29} (2017Le03). Other: 4.68 {I7} (1977Ba72) 
$Measured %I|g=0.353 {I20} (2017Le03) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L1)=2.2, Ice(L3)=0.02, Ice(M)=0.64 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0030 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 99.33 {I5} (1977Ba72), 99.28 {I2} (1975Ho14), 99.30 {I5} (1973Br12), 99.33 {I5} (1973Te06) 
RI$weighted average: 2.1 {I2} (1973Br12), 2.2 {I2} (1973Te06), 1.85 {I11} (1975Ho14), 2.0 {I1} (1999Ch12), 1.97 {I11} (2017Le03). Other: 1.56 {I4} (1977Ba72). 
$Measured %I|g=0.137 {I7} (2017Le03) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(M1+M2)=0.112, Ice(M3)=0.024, Ice(N)=0.042 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 105.65 {I10} (1977Ba72), 105.81 {I3} (1975Ho14), 105.73 {I10} (1973Br12), 105.74 {I10} (1973Te06) 
RI$weighted average: 0.14 {I2} (1973Br12), 0.13 {I8} (1973Te06), 0.11 {I1} (1975Ho14), 0.12 {I1} (1999Ch12) Other: 0.482 {I25} for doublet (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$NRM weighted average of 124.914 {I17} (1979Bo30, statistical uncertainty 0.017 keV, systematic uncertainty is negligible), 125.00 {I10} (1977Ba72), 124.93 {I2} (1975Ho14), 125.10 {I5} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.95 {I9} (1973Br12), 0.86 {I5} (1975Ho14), 0.88 {I2} (1999Ch12). Other: 1.01 {I4} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 183.480 {I25} (1979Bo30, statistical uncertainty of 0.025 keV, systematic uncertainty is negligible), 183.4 {I1} (1977Ba72), 183.50 {I2} (1975Ho14), 183.47 {I7} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.57 {I6} (1973Br12), 0.506 {I20} (1975Ho14), 0.49 {I2} (1999Ch12). Other: 1.005 {I26} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$other:44.1 {I3} (1973Br12, from |g|g-coin) 
RI$weighted average: 0.06 {I4} (1973Br12), 0.011 {I3} (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 106.61 {I3} (1975Ho14), 106.58 {I10} (1973Br12), 106.66 {I8} (1973Te06). Other: 106.85 {I10} (1977Ba72) 
RI$weighted average: 0.34 {I4} (1973Br12), 0.33 {I10} (1973Te06), 0.262 {I15} (1975Ho14), 0.264 {I11} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.482 {I25} for doublet (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 116.80 {I10} (1977Ba72), 116.82 {I2} (1975Ho14), 116.91 {I5} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.39 {I4} (1973Br12), 0.318 {I20} (1975Ho14), 0.34 {I2} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.367 {I21} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 134.00 {I5} (1977Ba72), 134.03 {I2} (1975Ho14), 134.14 {I8} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.42 {I5} (1973Br12), 0.37 {I2} (1975Ho14), 0.38 {I1} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.562 {I21} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$others: 63.65 {I5} (1977Ba72), 63.7 {I2} (1973Br12, from |g|g-coin) 
RI$weighted average: 0.68 {I14} (1973Br12), 0.35 {I5} (1975Ho14), 0.29 {I5} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.343 {I16} (1977Ba72) 
$Ice(L1)/100 decays=0.21 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 135.664 {I11} (1979Bo30, statistical uncertainty of 0.011 keV, systematic uncertainty is negligible); 135.66 {I5} (1977Ba72); 135.68 {I2} (1975Ho14); 135.77 {I6} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 1.3 {I1} (1973Br12), 1.20 {I8} (1975Ho14), 1.17 {I4} (1999Ch12). Other: 1.704 {I28} (1977Ba72) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(K)=0.51, Ice(L)=0.083, Ice(M)=0.024 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 145.15 {I30} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.12 {I3} (1973Br12), 0.089 {I6} (1975Ho14), 0.084 {I6} (1999Ch12) 
M$1975Ho14 state that from ce intensity limit, multipolarity cannot be M2, E3 or higher, thus restricted to dipole or E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 145.90 {I5} (1977Ba72), 145.94 {I2} (1975Ho14), 146.00 {I7} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.58 {I6} (1973Br12), 0.49 {I3} (1975Ho14), 0.47 {I2} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.571 {I25} (1977Ba72) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(K)=0.115, Ice(L)=0.024 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$statistical uncertainty=0.0043 keV (1979Bo30). Others: 163.15 {I5} (1977Ba72), 163.12 {I2} (1975Ho14), 163.16 {I6} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 2.6 {I3} (1973Br12), 2.38 {I14} (1975Ho14), 2.30 {I8} (1999Ch12). Others: 6.46 {I35} (2017Le03, seems discrepant), 2.75 {I6} (1977Ba72). 
$Measured %I|g=0.452 {I24} (2017Le03) seems discrepant 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(K)=0.64, Ice(L)=0.093, Ice(M)=0.022 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 169.66 {I3} (1975Ho14) and 169.58 {I10} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.03 {I1} (1973Br12), 0.0185 {I15} (1975Ho14), 0.021 {I1} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$others: 188.7 {I1} (1977Ba72), 188.77 {I20} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.08 {I1} (1973Br12), 0.049 {I3} (1975Ho14), 0.049 {I1} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.084 {I8} (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 240.4 {I2} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.0050 {I5} (1973Br12), 0.0043 {I15} (1975Ho14), 0.0040 {I5} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 308.9 {I3} (1973Br12) 
RI$unweighted average: 0.008 {I1} (1973Br12), 0.0060 {I6} (1975Ho14), 0.0053 {I2} (1999Ch12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 318.0 {I4} (1973Br12) 
RI$unweighted average: 0.0020 {I2} (1973Br12), 0.00123 {I15} (1975Ho14), 0.0013 {I2} (1999Ch12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 136.78 {I20} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.09 {I3} (1973Br12), 0.065 {I3} (1975Ho14), 0.067 {I3} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$others: 217.977 {I106} (1979Bo30), 218.00 {I5} (1977Ba72, not fully resolved), 218.00 {I7} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.67 {I7} (1973Br12), 0.62 {I5} (1975Ho14), 0.60 {I1} (1999Ch12). Other: 0.96 {I3} for triplet (1977Ba72) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(K)|<0.005, Ice(L)|<0.0037 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 236.01 {I3} (1975Ho14) and 236.17 {I7} (1973Br12). Others: 236.1 {I1} (1977Ba72, not fully resolved) 
RI$weighted average: 0.18 {I2} (1973Br12), 0.14 {I1} (1975Ho14), 0.138 {I5} (1999Ch12). Other: 1.47 {I3} for doublet (1977Ba72) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 242.50 {I4} (1975Ho14) and 242.6 {I1} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.0130 {I6} (1973Br12), 0.013 {I1} (1975Ho14), 0.011 {I1} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$other: 311.0 {I1} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.054 {I5} (1973Br12), 0.045 {I3} (1975Ho14), 0.046 {I2} (1999Ch12) 
$I(ce)/100 decays: Ice(L)=0.00032, Ice(M)=0.00011, Ice(N)=0.00003 (1975Ho14) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$other: 320.2 {I3} (1973Br12) 
RI$unweighted average: 0.0035 {I3} (1973Br12), 0.0017 {I2} (1975Ho14), 0.0020 {I2} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$others: 249.8 (1977Ba72), 249.8 {I3} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.010 {I2} (1973Br12), 0.012 {I1} (1975Ho14), 0.012 {I1} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 250.5 {I3} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.011 {I2} (1973Br12), 0.010 {I1} (1975Ho14), 0.010 {I1} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 267.62 {I8} (1975Ho14), 267.80 {I7} (1973Br12) 
RI$weighted average: 0.0230 {I6} (1973Br12), 0.018 {I2} (1975Ho14), 0.019 {I1} (1999Ch12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from the Adopted Gammas 
TI$from transition intensity balance at 9.19 level, assuming no direct |e feeding to the 9.19 level, as expected from |DJ|p=(2), |D|p=(no) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$other: 58.55 {I4} (1994Br36) 
RI$6.4 {I4} in 1994Br36 is adjusted by evaluators to 6.8 {I4} to obtain transition intensity balance at 58.57 level, with no direct |e feeding to this level 
$Ice(L1+L2)=205 {I21}, Ice(L3)=156 {I16}, Ice(M)=116 {I12}, Ice(N)=31 {I3} (1994Br36). Other: 1961Ho29 
$Ice(L1)=5.7, Ice(L2)=189, Ice(L3)=170 (1961Ho29, cited by 1994Br36) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(L2)=2.2, Ice(L3)=1.5 (1961Ho29, cited by 1994Br36) 
RI$from 1961Ho29, cited by 1994Br36, where I|g is deduced from relative conversion electron intensity and |a(theory) for E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$other: 84.23 {I7} (1994Br36) 
$Ice(L1+L2)=83 {I1}, Ice(M)=24 {I1}, Ice(N)=17 {I1} (1994Br36). Other: 1961Ho29 
$Ice(L1)=71, Ice(L2)=37, Ice(L3)=4.1 (1961Ho29, cited by 1994Br36) 
$Total conversion coefficient from ce data in {+231}Th |b{+-} decay. Other: 2.6 {I1} from summed conversion coefficients in 1994Br36 
$Transition is anomalously converted (1960As02). See also 2008Go10. 
$|a(O1)exp=0.031 (1961Ho29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$other: 217.9 {I2} (1994Br36) 
$Energy is from 1994Br36. I|g is a unweighted average of discrepant values: 5.26 {I3} (1996Le01) and 3.0 {I4} (1994Br36). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$58.5 {I4} (1973Br12) 
$I|g=0.6 {I2} (1973Br12) is imprecise. I|g=0.50 {I3} deduced by evaluators from I|g(25.6)=14.3 {I7}, I|a(58)=1.8 {I3}, and intensity balance at 58-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$84.2 {I1} (1973Br12) 
M$Anomalous E1 |g ray. Total conversion coefficient from {+231}Th |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
CC$experimental conversion coefficient measured by 1972SeZI. Transition is anomalous, the total conversion coefficient is much enhanced as compared to the theoretical value of 0.177. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$from |a decay. Other: 224 {I21} from |b{+-} decay is in severe disagreement. The intensities of the 117.7 and 212.3 |g rays given in 2008De31 measurement seem problematic. Evaluators recommend |g-branching ratios for the 212-keV level from |a decay, as the level is more strongly populated in this decay as compared to that in |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 57.104 {I20} (1979Go12), 57.15 {I4} (1976Sk01), 57.112 {I20} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.356 {i16} (2004Sh07), 0.366 {i3} (2002Lu01), 0.360 {I5} (2002Wo03), 0.354 {I8} (2000Sc04), 0.34 {I1} (1988Wo01), 0.38 {I4} (1979Go12). Others: 0.39 {I1} (1984Va27), 0.42 {I2} (1981Ba68), 0.43 {I3} (1976Sk01) 
M$L1, L2, L3 ce lines used for normalization (1988Wo01) 
$L12:L3:M:N=26:18:16:5.6 (1969Br12) 
E$admixture of {+233}Pa decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 29.374 {I20} (1979Go12), 29.373 {I10} (1976Sk01), 29.375 {I20} (1974HeYW) 
$1990Pe16: Ice(L1)=1.4% {I2}, Ice(L2)=1.6% {I2}, Ice(L3)=2.6% {I2} 
RI$unweighted average of 13.2 {I4} (2004Sh07), 13.51 {I16} (2002Lu01), 14.12 {I15} (2000Sc04), 13.9 {I1} (1990Lo04), 15.0 {I4} (1984Va27), 15.6 {I2} (1981Ba68), 16.3 {I9} (1976Sk01). Weighted average is 14.2 {I3}, but reduced |h{+2}=14. Others: 19.3 {I9} (1988Wo01), 9.8 {I10} (1979Go12), both seem discrepant. 
M$ce data of 1988Wo01 indicate that this transition may be an anomalous E1, as is the 86.477|g. Measured I(ce) are: M1:M2:M3:M4:M5=<8:61 {I8}:55 {I7}:12 {I3}:9.0 {I18}; the theoretical ratios for E1 are: 36:41.1:(55):14.1:16.9 (normalized at M3 line). The deduced M conversion coefficients are smaller than the theoretical ones, in contrast to the 86.477|g. However, as 1988Wo01 pointed out, the detector efficiency was not completely reliable for E(ce)<50 keV. The theoretical conversion coefficients are given here for that reason, rather than the deduced ones from measured I(ce)/I|g ratios. 
$|a(29|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.28 {I17} (1967Hu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 86.477 {I10} (1979Go12), 86.503 {I20} (1976Sk01), 86.486 {I10} (1974HeYW) 
RI$unweighted average of 12.86 {I21} (2000Wo01), 11.40 {I24} (2002Lu01), 12.44 {I33} (1984Va27), 11.5 {I3} (1981Ba68), 12.6 {I13} (1969Br12). Weighted average is 12.1 {I3}, but reduced |h{+2}=6.7. Others: I|g(86.48+86.8 from {+233}Pa decay)=13.6 {I5} (2004Sh07), 14.1 {I3} (2000Sc04,2002Wo03), 14.0 {I4} (2002Lu01) 
$L12:L3:M:N=133:8:40:13 (1969Br12) 
$The M and N+ regions of the ce spectra are highly complex. 
CC$from I(ce)/I|g measured by 1988Wo01. Other: 1.49 {I18}, analyzed by 2008Go10 from data for measured conversion L-shell conversion coefficients for anomalous E1 transition. The total conversion coefficient is much enhanced as compared to the theoretical value of 0.177. 
M$anomalous E1. See 1960As02 for discussions. Others: 1969Br12, 2008Go10 
$|a(87|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I4} (1967Hu03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from {+233}Th |b{+-} decay. Other: 8.03 (1990Lo04) with I|g=0.034 {I11} 
$Total I(ce)(8.22|g)/I|g(88.0|g)|?62, as deduced in {+233}Th |b{+-} decay, yields total Ice(8.22|g)|?9. 
M$from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$unweighted average of 0.134 {I13} (2004Sh07), 0.167 {I4} (2002Lu01), 0.143 {I1} (1990Lo04). Weighted average is 0.146 {I6} with reduced |h{+2}=16 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 94.64 {I5} (1979Go12), 94.66 {I5} (1976Sk01) 
M$from Adopted Gammas 
RI$weighted average of 0.575 {I19} (2004Sh07) and 0.615 {I23} (2002Lu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 46.53 {I6} (1979Go12), 46.534 {I40} (1976Sk01) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.100 {I13} (2004Sh07), 0.103 {I2} (2002Wo03), 0.104 {I4} (2000Sc04), 0.113 {I1} (1990Lo04), 0.121 {I10} (1988Wo01), 0.110 {I10} (1984Va27), 0.119 {I4} (1981Ba68), 0.100 {I10} (1979Go12). Weighted average is 0.111 {I2} with reduced |h{+2}=4.5. Other: 0.163 {I5} (2002Lu01) seems discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1976Sk01. Other: 106.15 {I25} (1979Go12) 
RI$weighted average of 0.051 {I3} (2004Sh07), 0.049 {I1} (2002Lu01), 0.048 {I1} (1990Lo04), 0.042 {I3} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from Adopted Gammas 
E$weighted average of 162.41 {I8} (1979Go12), 162.50 {I6} (1976Sk01), 162.52 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0327 {I12} (2000Sc04) and 0.032 {I4} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 115.40 {I35} (1979Go12), 115.45 {I20} (1976Sk01) 
RI$from 1976Sk01. Others: 0.32 (1979Go12) is in disagreement, probably includes sum peak; 0.332 {I10} for sum peak (2000Sc04) 
E$admixture with U K x-rays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 131.101 {I25} (1979Go12), 131.043 {I30} (1976Sk01), 131.11 {I2} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.075 {I5} (2004Sh07), 0.0857 {I22} (2000Sc04), and 0.091 {I5} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 194.95 {I3} (1979Go12), 194.97 {I2} (1974HeYW). Other: 195.096 {I20} (1976Sk01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.16 {I3} (2004Sh07), 0.177 {I5} (2000Sc04), 0.191 {I6} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 201.62 {I5} (1979Go12), 201.72 {I5} (1976Sk01), 201.670 {I25} (1974HeYW). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0393 {I9} (2000Sc04) and 0.041 {I4} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$from level-energy difference. E|g=108.0 was given by 1969Br12 from E(ceL12) and E(ceM) measured in coincidence with |a. 
RI$weighted average of 0.072 {I4} (2004Sh07) and 0.070 {I3} (2002Lu01). Other: 0.068 {I15} from I|g(108|g):I|g(117|g):I|g(155|g):I|g(212|g)= 23 {I4}:56 {I6}:31 {I2}:55 {I4}, measured by 1969Br12 in |a|g-coin spectrum. I|g(108.2+108.7+109.1)+x-ray=0.864 {I19} (2000Sc04). 
$L12:L3:M=62:<3:17 (1969Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 117.702 {I20} (1979Go12), 117.681 {I30} (1976Sk01), 117.718 {I20} (1974HeYW). 
RI$weighted average of 0.169 {I17} (2004Sh07), 0.184 {I12} (2002Lu01), 0.169 {I4} (2000Sc04) and 0.15 {I2} (1988Wo01) 
$L12:L3:M:N=90:8:51:|?8 (1969Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 155.239 {I20} (1979Go12), 155.22 {I4} (1976Sk01), 155.25 {I2} (1974HeYW). 
RI$weighted average of 0.087 {I6} (2004Sh07), 0.091 {I6} (2002Lu01), 0.0889 {I18} (2000Sc04) and 0.086 {I6} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 212.29 {I5} (1979Go12), 212.33 {I2} (1974HeYW). Other: 212.415 {I25} (1976Sk01), 
RI$weighted average of 0.150 {I4} (2002Lu01), 0.151 {I3} (2000Sc04) and 0.156 {I4} (1988Wo01). Other: 0.209 {I7} for 212.4+214.1 (2004Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 134.285 {I20} (1979Go12), 134.23 {I4} (1976Sk01), 134.28 {I3} (1974HeYW). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.073 {I6} (2004Sh07), 0.075 {I3} (2002Lu01), 0.067 {I3} (2000Sc04), 0.0640 {I9} (1990Lo04) and 0.080 {I5} (1988Wo01). Weighted average is 0.066 {I3} with reduced |h{+2}=5.8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 143.249 {I20} (1979Go12), 143.208 {I25} (1976Sk01), 143.254 {I10} (1974HeYW). 
RI$unweighted average of 0.394 {I24} (2004Sh07), 0.428 {I3} (2002Lu01), 0.443 {I8}, 0.387 {I2} (1990Lo04) and 0.43 {I1} (1988Wo01). Weighted average is 0.410 {I11} with reduced |h{+2}=17 
$|a(N+)exp<0.76 {i3} (1988Wo01) 
$|a(L3)exp=|a(M2)exp=|a(M3)exp=|a(M4)exp=|a(M5)exp<0.44 {I2} (1988Wo01) 
$From their ce data, 1988Wo01 give %E2=9 {I7} or |d(E2/M1)=0.31 {I+13-17} 
$K:L12:L3:M:N=250:69:<5:15:6 (1969Br12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 151.414 {I20} (1979Go12), 151.375 {I35} (1976Sk01), 151.410 {I15} (1974HeYW). 
RI$weighted average of 0.223 {I14} (2004Sh07), 0.244 {I3} (2002Lu01), 0.232 {I24} (2000Sc04) and 0.248 {I7} (1988Wo01) 
$Measured conversion electron intensities for this transition do not agree well: Ice(K)/Ice(L1+L2)=2.0 {I6} (1988Wo01), |?6.5 (1968Br12). Ice(L1)/Ice(L2)=15.8 {I26}:8.3 {I21} measured by 1988Wo01 is used to determine the M1+E2 admixture. Other: 1969Br12 
$|a(M1)exp=|a(M2)exp=|a(M3)exp=|a(M4)exp=|a(M5)exp<0.71 {I4} (1988Wo01) 
$K:L12:L3:M=|?220:34:2:8 (1969Br12) 
MR$deduced by evaluators considering experimental ce data for K, L1 and L2 shells from 1988Wo01, and K:L12:L3:M ratio data (with 25% uncertainty) from 1969Br12. Using data from 1988Wo01 only, evaluators obtain |d<0.5, whereas 1988Wo01 give %E2=33 {I9} or |d(E2/M1)=0.70 {I16}, which the evaluators cannot reproduce. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 180.81 {I10} (1979Go12), 180.80 {I8} (1976Sk01), 180.78 {I5} (1974HeYW). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0158 {I10} and 0.015 {I2} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 237.86 {I2} (1979Go12), 237.908 {I20} (1974HeYW). Other: 238.04 {I4} (1976Sk01) 
RI$weighted average of 0.067 {I4} (2004Sh07), 0.056 {I3} (2002Lu01), 0.0569 {I6} (2000Sc04) and 0.059 {I3} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 170.59 {I6} (1979Go12), 170.63 {I8} (1976Sk01), 170.64 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 1976Sk01 and 1979Go12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 176.12 {I6} (1979Go12), 176.09 {I7} (1976Sk01), 176.06 {I5} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.012 {I4} (2000Sc04) and 0.020 {I4} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 193.26 {I5} (1979Go12), 193.26 {I4} (1976Sk01), 193.22 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.041 {I8} (2004Sh07), 0.030 {I5} (2002Lu01), 0.0437 {I10} (2000Sc04), 0.049 {I3} (1988Wo01). Reduced |h{+2}=3.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 209.19 {I5} (1979Go12), 209.25 {I5} (1976Sk01), 209.18 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
RI$from 2000Sc04. Others: <0.02 (2004Sh07), 0.019 {I2} (2002Lu01), 0.010 {I2} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 191.46 {I5} (1979Go12), 191.45 {I6} (1976Sk01), 191.42 {I3} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.023 {I5} (2004Sh07), 0.015 {I4} (2002Lu01), 0.0192 {I15} (2000Sc04) and 0.014 {I5} (1988Wo01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 196.86 {I5} (1979Go12), 196.84 {I6} (1976Sk01), 196.8 {I1} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.020 {I4} (2004Sh07), 0.024 {I5} (2002Lu01), 0.0208 {I12} (2000Sc04) and 0.021 {I2} (1988Wo01). Other: 0.156 {I2} (1990Lo04) seems discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 214.01 {I5} (1979Go12), 214.09 {I5} (1976Sk01), 213.96 {I4} (1974HeYW) 
RI$weighted average of 0.039 {I2} (2002Lu01), 0.0362 {I8} (2000Sc04), and 0.034 {I1} (1988Wo01). Others: 0.209 {I7} for 212.4+214.0 (2004Sh07), 0.132 {I2} (1990Lo04) 
CC$ for assumed |d|?0.4 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$from 1976Sk01 
RI$from 2002Lu01. Others: 0.03 {I1} (2004Sh07), 0.051 {I15} (1976Sk01). Alaga rule suggests I|g|<0.013 if I|g(199.95|g) deexciting the 303.6 level is <0.004. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 248.95 {I10} (1979Go12), 248.90 {I10} (1976Sk01) 
RI$others: 0.006 {I3} (2002Lu01); for 248.5 (from {+233}Pa decay)+248.9: 0.0618 {I11} (2000Sc04), 0.10 {I5} (2004Sh07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$average of 1981Ba68, 1971Cl03 and 1969Br12. Others: 0.019 {I6} (1979Go12) for 257.1+258.2 (from {+233}Pa decay): <0.05 (2004Sh07), 0.036 {I5} (2002Lu01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from conversion electron spectra only (1972SeZI) 
RI$from measured Ice(N1)=9 {I1}, Ice(N2)=1.2 {I2} (1972SeZI) and theoretical |a(N1)=537 {I15}, |a(N2)=67.0 {I18} for M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$0.0498 {I14} (2008De31) 
E$weighted average of 57.11 {I5} (1979Bo30), 57.15 {I4} (1972SeZI), 57.1 {I1} (1969HoZY). Other: 57.14 {I5} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.054 (1972SeZI), 0.061 (1969HoZY), 0.21 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(L1)=0.14 {I5}, Ice(L2)=3.60 {I5}, Ice(L3)=3.50 {I5}, Ice(M2)=1.20 {I15}, Ice(M3)=1.00 {I15}, Ice(M4)=0.20 {I5}, Ice(N2)=0.4 {I1}, Ice(N3)=0.30 {I5}, Ice(O)=0.15 {I4} mixed with Ice(K) of 169.5|g (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from conversion electron spectra only (1972SeZI) 
RI$0.0005 {I2} from |a(L2)=40.5, |a(L3)=32.6 for E2, and Ice(L2)=0.03 {I1}, Ice(L3)=0.03 {I1} (1972SeZI), but intensity balance at this level requires about double the intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(70.5|g)/I|g(63.9|g)=1.0 {I3}, as in the Adopted Gammas, where the data are from {+237}Np |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$2.1727 {I647} (2008De31) 
$E|g=29.36 {I4} (1972SeZI), 29.60 {I5} (1969HoZY), 29.41 {I5} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=2.5 (1972SeZI), 0.95 (1969HoZY) 
$Ice(L1)=1.1 {I2}, Ice(L2)=2.0 {I3}, Ice(L3)=2.7 {I3}, Ice(M1)=0.30 {I6}, Ice(M2)=0.40 {I7}, Ice(M3)=0.52 {I7}, Ice(M4)=0.19 {I5}, Ice(N1)=0.19 {I5}, Ice(N2)=0.15 {I4}, Ice(N3)=0.12 {I4}, Ice(O)=0.10 {I3} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$1.8428 {I18} (2008De31) 
$E|g=86.50 {I5} (1972SeZI), 86.6 {I1} (1969HoZY), 86.3 {I1} (1969-Fettweis), 86.55 {I5} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=2.7 (1972SeZI), 2.7 (1969HoZY), 2.7 (1969-Fettweis), 2.7 (1970-Malmskog). Value of absolute intensity=2.7 taken from 1957Fr55 
$Ice(L1)=0.7 {I1}, Ice(L2)=0.8 {I1}, Ice(L3)=0.10 {I2}, Ice(M1)=0.35 {I5}, Ice(M2)=0.28 {I4}, Ice(M3)=0.047 {I10} mixed Ice(K) of 195|g, Ice(N1)=0.14 {I4}, Ice(O)=0.05 {I1} (1972SeZI) 
M,CC$from experimental ce data in {+237}Np |a decay. Transition is anomalous, the total conversion coefficient is much enhanced as compared to the theoretical value of 0.177. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from conversion electron spectra only (1972SeZI) 
TI$from intensity balance at 86.4 level, where no |b feeding is expected. 
$Ice(N2)=1.8 {I3}, Ice(N3)=1.7 {I3} (1972SeZI) 
$|d(E2/M1)<0.11 from N2/N3 ratio in 1972SeZI 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.1698 {I8} (2008De31) 
$E|g=87.8 {I2} (1972SeZI, from |g|g-coin), 89.51 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 88.6 {I7} (1970-Malmskog); 88.2 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.3 (1972SeZI), 1.1 (1969-Fettweis), 0.27 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$0.7749 {I13} (2008De31) 
E$from the Adopted Gammas. Measured values from {+233}Th decay are: E|g=94.7 {I2} (1972SeZI), 94.5 {I5} (1969HoZY), 93.97 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 94.60 (1970-Malmskog); 94.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.8 (1972SeZI), 0.88 (1969HoZY), 5.5 (1969-Fettweis), 0.92 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(L1)=0.05 {I2}, Ice(M1)=0.010 {I5} mixed with Ice(K) of 201|g (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=74.7 {I2} (1972SeZI), 74.70 {I10} (1970-Malmskog), 76.1 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.052 (1972SeZI), 0.064 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$Other measured values in {+233}Th decay are: E|g=162.5 {I1} (1972SeZI), 162.7 {I1} (1969HoZY), 162.70 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 162.55 {I10} (1970-Malmskog), 161.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.32 (1972SeZI), 0.28 (1969HoZY), 0.31 (1969-Fettweis), 0.30 (1970-Malmskog) 
RI$0.1674 {I10} for the doublet (2008De31). Intensity divided based on I|g(162)/I(169)=0.52 {I2} in Adopted Gammas, where it is taken from {+237}Np |a decay. Rest of the intensity i.e. 0.0369 {I52} of the 162|g is assigned from the 257 level 
$Ice(K)=0.010 {I5} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.2509 {I8} (2008De31) 
E$other measurements: E|g=169.1 {I2} (1972SeZI), 169.4 {I1} (1969HoZY), 169.36 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 170.3 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.34 (1972SeZI), 0.47 (1969HoZY), 0.50 (1969-Fettweis) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$0.0508 {I8} (2008De31) E|g=131.1 {I1} (1972SeZI), 131.2 {I1} (1969HoZY), 131.22 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 131.20 {I20} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.056 (1972SeZI), 0.074 (1969HoZY), 0.058 (1969-Fettweis), 0.079 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$0.1073 {I9} (2008De31) 
$E|g=194.90 {I5} (1972Vo08), 195.0 {I2} (1972SeZI), 195.00 {I5} (1969HoZY), 195.08 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 195.00 {I20} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.16 (1972SeZI), 0.18 (1969HoZY), 0.23 (1969-Fettweis), 0.19 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(L1)=0.005 (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=201.6 {I2} (1972SeZI), 201.75 {I10} (1969HoZY), 201.77 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 200.99 {I30} (1970-Malmskog), 161.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.031 (1972SeZI), 0.031 (1969HoZY), 0.042 (1969-Fettweis), 0.028 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)<0.01, mixed with Ice(M1) of 94|g (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(108.7|g)/I|g(155.2|g)=0.80 {I4}, as in the Adopted Gammas, where the data are from {+237}Np |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=143.2 {I1} (1972SeZI), 143.35 {I5} (1969HoZY), 143.36 {I20} (1969-Fettweis), 143.38 {I20} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.014 (1972SeZI), 0.020 (1969HoZY), 0.012 (1969-Fettweis), 0.024 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(L1)=0.014 (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0407 {I4} (2008De31) 
$E|g=153.6 {I2} (1972SeZI), 153.5 {I1} (1969HoZY), 153.74 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 153.54 {I20} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.066 (1972SeZI), 0.062 (1969HoZY), 0.071 (1969-Fettweis), 0.077 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0507 {I4} (2008De31) 
$E|g=170.7 {I3} (1972SeZI), 171.2 {I3} (1969HoZY), 171.32 {I30} (1969-Fettweis) 
$I|g=0.13 (1972SeZI), 0.014 (1969HoZY), 0.071 (1969-Fettweis) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=186.8 {I2} (1972SeZI), 186.8 {I1} (1969HoZY), 186.13 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 186.88 {I30} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.034 (1972SeZI), 0.023 (1969HoZY), 0.058 (1969-Fettweis), 0.039 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.075, Ice(L1)=0.009 (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$0.0524 {I10} (2008De31). All the intensity of the 257.3 doublet is assigned from the 257 level, based on intensity balance arguments. 
$E|g=257.30 {I15} (1972SeZI, doublet), 257.4 {I1} (1969HoZY), 257.45 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 257.3 {I4} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.068 (1972SeZI), 0.085 (1969HoZY), 0.15 (1969-Fettweis), 0.081 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.035 {I7}, Ice(L1)=0.009 {I4} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.0861 {I9} (2008De31) 
E$others: 190.54 {I8} (1972SeZI), 190.7 {I1} (1969HoZY), 190.72 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 190.59 {I20} (1970-Malmskog), 191.2 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.13 (1972SeZI), 0.16 (1969HoZY), 0.17 (1969-Fettweis), 0.15 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.39, Ice(L1)=0.028, Ice(M1)=0.018, Ice(N)=0.007, mixed with Ice(L1) of 210|g (1972SeZI) 
MR$from |a(K)exp. Others: <0.7 from |a(M1)exp is consistent, but 1.4 {I+4-3} from |a(L1)exp is inconsistent; |a(N)exp allows all |d 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=210.6 {I2} (1972SeZI), 210.1 {I3} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.035 (1972SeZI), 0.032 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.04 {I1} (1972SeZI); M1+E2 suggested by 1972SeZI from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with |DJ|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=361.4 {I2} (1972SeZI), 362.0 {I6} (1970-Malmskog), 362.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.038 (1972SeZI), 0.043 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=377.0 {I3} (1972SeZI), 377.3 {I2} (1969HoZY), 376.94 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 377.2 {I4} (1970-Malmskog), 377.2 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.038 (1972SeZI), 0.032 (1969HoZY), 0.10 (1969-Fettweis), 0.041 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.1912 {I13} (2008De31) 
E$others: 440.96 {I7} (1972Vo08), 441.0 {I3} (1972SeZI), 440.9 {I2} (1969HoZY), 440.86 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 440.97 {I20} (1970-Malmskog), 441.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.23 (1972SeZI), 0.27 (1969HoZY), 0.79 (1969-Fettweis), 0.39 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.058 {I7} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.1043 {I10} (2008De31) 
E$others: 447.77 {I30} (1972Vo08), 447.7 {I3} (1972SeZI), 447.6 {I2} (1969HoZY), 447.57 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 447.6 {I20} (1970-Malmskog), 445.3 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.15 (1972SeZI), 0.14 (1969HoZY), 0.42 (1969-Fettweis), 0.18 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.037 {I7} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=216.6 {I2} (1972SeZI), 216.9 {I2} (1969HoZY), 216.92 {I20} (1969-Fettweis), 216.7 {I3} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.015 (1972SeZI), 0.055 (1969HoZY), 0.012 (1969-Fettweis), 0.018 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.016 {I7} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=252.9 {I3} (1972SeZI), 252.5 {I5} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.012 (1972SeZI), 0.011 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$E|g=285.5 {I3} (1972SeZI), 284.90 {I20} (1969-Fettweis) 
$I|g=0.021 (1972SeZI), 0.048 (1969-Fettweis) 
$Ice(K)=0.016 {I4} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.0869 {I7} (2008De31) 
E$others: 359.9 {I1} (1972SeZI), 359.9 {I1} (1969HoZY), 360.09 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 360.1 {I1} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.12 (1972SeZI), 0.13 (1969HoZY), 0.39 (1969-Fettweis), 0.15 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.07 {I1}, Ice(L1)=0.009 {I4} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.9886 {I20} (2008De31) 
E$others: 459.26 {I6} (1972Vo08), 459.2 {I2} (1972SeZI), 459.2 {I1} (1969HoZY), 459.10 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 459.18 {I20} (1970-Malmskog), 460.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=1.4 (1972SeZI), 1.4 (1969HoZY), 4.2 (1969-Fettweis), 1.7 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.40 {I5}, Ice(L1)=0.046 {I7} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$others: 497.1 {I4} (1972SeZI), 496.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.021 (1972SeZI) 
$Placement considered uncertain as it involves transition from 1/2+,3/2+ level to 7/2-, 57 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=347.3 {I3} (1972SeZI), 347.6 {I3} (1969HoZY), 347.5 {I3} (1969-Fettweis), 347.5 {I5} (1970-Malmskog), 460.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.012 (1972SeZI), 0.0081 (1969HoZY), 0.066 (1969-Fettweis), 0.015 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.1078 {I11} (2008De31) 
E$others: 490.9 {I3} (1972SeZI), 490.7 {I2} (1969HoZY), 490.70 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 490.82 {I20} (1970-Malmskog), 492.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.17 (1972SeZI), 0.14 (1969HoZY), 0.46 (1969-Fettweis), 0.15 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.037 {I7} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.1576 {I9} (2008De31) 
E$others: 499.20 {I30} (1972Vo08), 499.0 {I3} (1972SeZI), 498.2 {I2} (1969HoZY), 498.74 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 498.94 {I20} (1970-Malmskog), 500.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.21 (1972SeZI), 0.19 (1969HoZY), 0.71 (1969-Fettweis), 0.27 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.037 {I7} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.0278 {I4} (2008De31) 
$Ice(L1)=0.018 {I6} (1972SeZI) 
$E|g=179.0 {I2} (1972SeZI), 179.1 {I1} (1969HoZY), 179.32 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 179.18 {I30} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.038 (1972SeZI), 0.054 (1969HoZY), 0.033 (1969-Fettweis), 0.041 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$E|g=211.3 {I2} (1972SeZI), 211.3 {I3} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.019 (1972SeZI), 0.032 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.02 {I1} (1972SeZI) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0463 {I9} (2008De31) 
$E|g=526.5 {I2} (1972SeZI), 526.6 {I2} (1969HoZY), 526.30 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 526.58 {I30} (1970-Malmskog), 528.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.063 (1972SeZI), 0.064 (1969HoZY), 0.19 (1969-Fettweis), 0.071 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=552.1 {I3} (1972SeZI), 552.3 {I2} (1969HoZY), 551.17 {I20} (1969-Fettweis), 551.89 {I60} (1970-Malmskog), 553.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.024 (1972SeZI), 0.047 (1969HoZY), 0.054 (1969-Fettweis), 0.026 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0545 {I10} (2008De31) 
$E|g=562.8 {I4} (1972SeZI), 562.6 {I2} (1969HoZY), 562.56 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 562.79 {I40} (1970-Malmskog), 564.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.070 (1972SeZI), 0.088 (1969HoZY), 0.22 (1969-Fettweis), 0.084 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.1178 {I8} (2008De31) 
$Ice(K)=0.016 {I7} (1972SeZI) 
$E|g=595.2 {I2} (1972SeZI), 595.3 {I2} (1969HoZY), 595.15 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 595.3 {I4} (1970-Malmskog), 596.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.16 (1972SeZI), 0.12 (1969HoZY), 0.50 (1969-Fettweis) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.5038 {I15} (2008De31), most of the intensity of 669.9 doublet is assigned from the 764 level. Based on Alaga rule, only a small component may belong from the 669 level 
E$weighted average of 669.901 {I16} (1979Bo30), 669.64 {I20} (1972Vo08), 669.8 {I2} (1972SeZI), 669.75 {I5} (1969HoZY). Others: 669.98 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 669.8 {I3} (1970-Malmskog), 670.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.68 (1972SeZI), 0.63 (1969HoZY), 2.3 (1969-Fettweis), 0.75 (1970-Malmskog) 
$Ice(K)=0.068 {I10} (1972SeZI) 
$Total I|g=0.5038 {I15} (2008De31); divided by 2008De31 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0647 {I6} (2008De31) 
E$others: 677.8 {I4} (1972SeZI), 677.8 {I3} (1969HoZY), 677.88 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 678.0 {I4} (1970-Malmskog), 801.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.087 (1972SeZI), 0.082 (1969HoZY), 0.27 (1969-Fettweis), 0.094 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0324 {I6} (2008De31) 
$E|g=757.8 {I4} (1972SeZI), 757.6 {I2} (1969HoZY), 757.66 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 757.8 {I7} (1970-Malmskog), 757.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.042 (1972SeZI), 0.042 (1969HoZY), 0.16 (1969-Fettweis), 0.047 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0891 {I7} (2008De31) 
$E|g=764.4 {I4} (1972SeZI), 764.3 {I2} (1969HoZY), 764.57 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 764.5 (1970-Malmskog), 763.1 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.12 (1972SeZI), 0.11 (1969HoZY), 0.42 (1969-Fettweis), 0.12 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.02 {I1}, Ice(L1)=0.007 {I3} (1972SeZI) 
$E|g=226.1 {I2} (1972SeZI), 226.3 {I1} (1969HoZY), 226.23 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 226.2 {I2} (1970-Malmskog), 801.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.023 (1972SeZI), 0.026 (1969HoZY), 0.042 (1969-Fettweis), 0.026 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0332 {I8} (2008De31) 
$E|g=573.7 {I4} (1972SeZI), 573.5 {I3} (1969HoZY), 573.40 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 573.76 {I40} (1970-Malmskog), 576.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.042 (1972SeZI), 0.043 (1969HoZY), 0.136 (1969-Fettweis), 0.043 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0294 {I4} (2008De31) 
$E|g=599.1 {I4} (1972SeZI), 599.3 {I2} (1969HoZY), 599.36 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 599.13 {I40} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.047 (1972SeZI), 0.041 (1969HoZY), 0.12 (1969-Fettweis), 0.047 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0567 {I9} (2008De31) 
$E|g=610.0 {I3} (1972SeZI), 609.9 {I2} (1969HoZY), 609.89 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 610.2 {I5} (1970-Malmskog), 609.8 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.085 (1972SeZI), 0.080 (1969HoZY), 0.24 (1969-Fettweis), 0.097 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0202 {I4} (2008De31) 
$E|g=642.3 {I4} (1972SeZI), 642.6 {I2} (1969HoZY), 642.53 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 642.39 {I40} (1970-Malmskog), 641.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.028 (1972SeZI), 0.028 (1969HoZY), 0.091 (1969-Fettweis), 0.030 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=708.0 {I6} (1972SeZI), 707.8 {I5} (1969HoZY), 708.0 {I6} (1970-Malmskog), 707.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.012 (1972SeZI), 0.0068 (1969HoZY), 0.141 (1969-Fettweis), 0.011 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0421 {I8} (2008De31) 
$E|g=716.9 {I4} (1972SeZI), 716.7 {I2} (1969HoZY), 716.78 {I30} (1969-Fettweis), 716.96 {I60} (1970-Malmskog), 718.1 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.056 (1972SeZI), 0.054 (1969HoZY), 0.20 (1969-Fettweis), 0.060 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI$0.0633 {I6} (2008De31) 
$Ice(K)=0.010 {I5} (1972SeZI) 
$E|g=725.0 {I4} (1972SeZI), 724.8 {I2} (1969HoZY), 724.80 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 725.1 {I6} (1970-Malmskog), 724.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.087 (1972SeZI), 0.081 (1969HoZY), 0.33 (1969-Fettweis), 0.090 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0236 {I4} (2008De31) 
$E|g=740.9 {I4} (1972SeZI), 740.9 {I2} (1969HoZY), 740.87 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 741.1 {I8} (1970-Malmskog), 740.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.031 (1972SeZI), 0.039 (1969HoZY), 0.11 (1969-Fettweis), 0.011 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=804.8 {I4} (1972SeZI), 805.3 {I2} (1969HoZY), 805.13 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 805.6 {I6} (1970-Malmskog), 801.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.031 (1972SeZI), 0.034 (1969HoZY), 0.141 (1969-Fettweis), 0.0056 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=811.6 {I7} (1972SeZI), 811 {I1} (1969HoZY), 811.5 {I6} (1969-Fettweis), 811.8 {I7} (1970-Malmskog), 811.9 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.0078 (1972SeZI), 0.0068 (1969HoZY), 0.029 (1969-Fettweis), 0.011 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=703.7 {I6} (1972SeZI), 703.6 {I5} (1969HoZY), 703.6 {I6} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.011 (1972SeZI), 0.0068 (1969HoZY), 0.011 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.0369 {I6} (2008De31) 
$E|g=935.2 {I7} (1972SeZI), 935.6 {I3} (1969HoZY), 934.79 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 935.4 {I7} (1970-Malmskog), 931.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.049 (1972SeZI), 0.043 (1969HoZY), 0.17 (1969-Fettweis), 0.054 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=941.9 {I8} (1972SeZI), 942.3 {I5} (1969HoZY), 942.6 {I8} (1970-Malmskog), 939.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.0078 (1972SeZI), 0.0068 (1969HoZY), 0.0086 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=874.0 {I5} (1972SeZI), 873.8 {I3} (1969HoZY), 873.81 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 874.24 {I8} (1970-Malmskog), 873.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.0082 (1972SeZI), 0.020 (1969HoZY), 0.066 (1969-Fettweis), 0.021 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=962.8 {I9} (1972SeZI), 962.5 {I10} (1969HoZY), 961.6 {I8} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.0014 (1972SeZI), 0.0068 (1969HoZY), 0.0064 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=968.2 {I9} (1972SeZI), 970.8 {I20} (1969HoZY), 969.8 {I9} (1970-Malmskog), 966.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.011 (1972SeZI), 0.0041 (1969HoZY), 0.011 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=398.8 {I5} (1972SeZI), 398.8 {I2} (1969HoZY), 398.77 {I20} (1969-Fettweis) 
$I|g=0.014 (1972SeZI), 0.023 (1969HoZY), 0.046 (1969-Fettweis) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.007 {I3} (1972SeZI) 
$E|g=430.9 {I4} (1972SeZI), 431.9 {I2} (1969HoZY), 431.62 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 430.8 {I6} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.023 (1972SeZI), 0.049 (1969HoZY), 0.17 (1969-Fettweis), 0.026 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=782.7 {I5} (1972SeZI), 783.5 {I3} (1969HoZY), 785.4 {I5} (1969-Fettweis), 783.7 {I7} (1970-Malmskog), 785.0 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.0061 (1972SeZI), 0.0081 (1969HoZY), 0.10 (1969-Fettweis), 0.013 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=815.9 {I4} (1972SeZI), 816.2 {I2} (1969HoZY), 816.25 {I10} (1969-Fettweis), 816.2 {I7} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.028 (1972SeZI), 0.034 (1969HoZY), 0.15 (1969-Fettweis), 0.041 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=880.9 {I5} (1972SeZI), 880.6 {I3} (1969HoZY), 880.04 {I20} (1969-Fettweis), 881.3 {I8} (1970-Malmskog), 879.5 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.0078 (1972SeZI), 0.014 (1969HoZY), 0.037 (1969-Fettweis), 0.015 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
RI$0.1052 {I8} (2008De31) 
$E|g=890.1 {I5} (1972SeZI), 889.9 {I3} (1969HoZY), 889.89 {I15} (1969-Fettweis), 890.5 {I6} (1970-Malmskog), 887.2 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.014 (1972SeZI), 0.011 (1969HoZY), 0.054 (1969-Fettweis), 0.015 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$E|g=978.3 {I8} (1972SeZI), 979.1 {I10} (1969HoZY), 978.6 {I4} (1970-Malmskog), 976.8 (1969Va06) 
$I|g=0.0075 (1972SeZI), 0.0061 (1969HoZY), 0.0064 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=433.2 {I4} (1972SeZI), 433.1 {I6} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.015 (1972SeZI), 0.0043 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=849.3 {I7} (1972SeZI), 851.8 {I8} (1969-Fettweis) 
$I|g=0.0047 (1972SeZI), 0.050 (1969-Fettweis) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [D,E2]
decay_comment:
$E|g=948.0 {I8} (1972SeZI), 948.7 {I8} (1970-Malmskog) 
$I|g=0.0075 (1972SeZI), 0.0085 (1970-Malmskog) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=LT;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Its energy was deduced from a limit on experimental detection (1973Go40). See {+234}Th |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=LT;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E transition was not observed. Energy of this expected transition was deduced by 1973Go40 from nonobservation of its conversion electrons. Their detection limit was 6 keV, and if there were conversion lines belonging to this transition in the 6 keV<E<10 keV energy range, they would have been obscured by intense Auger and Coster-Kronig electrons. 
I(|g+ce)(<10|g)=I(|g+ce)(73.92|g deexciting the 73.92 level). If there is no other transition deexciting the 1.159-min isomeric level, then I(|g+ce)(<10-keV |g)=I(|g+ce)(1.159-min isomeric-decay branch)=0.16% {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from Ice(L3) and theoretical conversion coefficient (BRICC) of lc3=1565 {I23}. 
Ice(L3)=353 {I35}; L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(N2+N3):O= 341 {I35}:353 {I35}:3.8 {I20}:97.5 {I70}:97.5 {I70}:59 {I10}:24 {I7}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E 62.97 {I9} was measured by 1973Ta25. 
RI I|g(62.86|g+63.29|g)=736; I|g(62.86|g)=3.2 {I5} from Ice(L)'s and L-subshell conversion coefficients. 
Ice(L3)=10.6 {I9}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2= 28 {I3}:20 {I1}:10.6 {I9}:6.4 {I5}:4.0 {I9}:4.0 {I3}:2.1 {I6}:1.9 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(62.86|g+63.29|g)=736 and I|g(62.86|g)=3.2 {I5}. 
E 63.282 {I2} (1973Sa33), 63.35 {I9} (1973Ta25). 
Ice(L1)=70 {I6}; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N2:N3:O= 70 {I6}:57 {I1}:62 {I2}:19 {I4}:19 {I4}:15 {I4}:1.3 {I7}:1.3 {I7}:5.1 {I11}:3.8 {I10}:4.0 {I10}:3.8 {I10}. |DI|g=51, estimated by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI see comment for I|g(92.38|g). 
E 92.792 {I5} (1973Sa33), 92.82 {I8} (1973Ta25). 
Ice(L1)=34 {I4}; L1:L2:L3=34 {I4}:17 {I3}:13 {I10}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
The photon peak was assumed by 1973Go40 to be a doublet from observed ce lines assigned as L1 lines. 
RI calculated from Ice(L1) and |a(L1)(M1 theory)=2.55 {I4} (BRICC). I|g(103.35|g+103.71|g)=1.31 {I10} was measured by 1973Go40 and I|g(103.5|g)=0.8 {I1} was given by 1978Ch06. 
Ice(L1 103.35|g)=1.6 {I5}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluators from measured Ice(M)'s and M-subshell conversion coefficients. 
Ice(M1)=107 {I4}; M1:M2:M3:N1:N2:N3:O1= 107 {I4}:47 {I2}:26 {I5}:32 {I5}:13 {I3}:12 {I3}:10 {I3}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
CC limit on |a(K) has been obtained by the evaluators from extrapolation of |a(K)'s for E|g|>113.6 keV. The K-binding energy for protactinium is 112.6 keV; therefore, a large uncertainty on the total conversion coefficient is given to reflect the uncertainty of the |a(K) value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E given in 1973Go40 (s ce). Other measurements: 1963Bj02, 1962Fo11. 
M from {+234}Th |b{+-} decay. 
Ice(L)/I(2290|b of 1.159-min {+234}Pa)=0.10/98 (1963Bj02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=LT;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed. Its energy was deduced from the limit on experimental detection (1973Go40). See {+234}Th |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E3]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$deduced by 2016Ri06 from observation of a 106-keV |g ray. Compiler considers it as a tentative energy due to tentative placement of 106-keV |g ray 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$a new |g ray observed by 2016Ri06 in |g|g-coin spectrum. Placement from 2016Ri06 is considered as tentative by compiler 
RI$absolute intensity per 100 decays |?0.0003 (2016Ri06), deduced from |g|g-coin spectrum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1984Mi02; other: 110.7 {I5} (1973Or06). 
RI$from 1984Mi02; other: 10.5 {I28} relative to I|g(642|g)=100 (1973Or06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1984Mi02; other: 112.7 {I+5-1} (1973Or06). 
RI$from 1984Mi02; other: 2.6 {I12} relative to I|g(642|g)=100 (1973Or06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from 1984Mi02; other: 229.6 {I10} (1973Or06). 
RI$from 1984Mi02; other: 2.0 {I10} relative to I|g(642|g)=100 (1973Or06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
TI$530 {I190} in 1998Gr19 
$Measured Ice(L+M)=45 {I9} (2004Hu04) for E|g=81.3 {I6} 
$Transition intensity=71 {I18} per 100 recoils (2004Hu04) 
E$from E(ceL)=60.8 {I5} and E(ceM)=78.2 {I7} (2004Hu11). Other: 80.5 {I5} (1998Gr19, estimated from systematics of first 2+ state in heavier U and Th isotopes) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 168.7 {I6} (1998Gr19, from |g-ray data), and 167.8 {I4} (2004Hu11, from E(ceL)=148.2 {I4} and E(ceM)=162.51 {I6}) 
$Measured I(ceL+ceM)=42 {I9} (2004Hu04) for E|g=167.8 {I4} 
$Transition intensity=51 {I11} per 100 recoils (2004Hu04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 51.77 keV {i5} (1970Lo02) and 51.72 keV {i5} (1971Ku25). Other value: 52.4 keV {i1} (1972Va24). 
RI$From 1972Va24. Others: 4.8 (1970Lo02), 3.8 (1971Ku25). 
M$from L2/L3=0.8 (1958Hi78). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g ray was not observed in {+230}Pa |b{+-} decay. E|g and multipolarity are from 1983Ha31, observed in (|a,4n|g) reaction. 
RI$From intensity balance at the 169.4-keV level, assuming no |b feeding to this level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 366.56 keV {I10} (1970Lo02), 366.8 keV {I3} (1972Va24), 366.5 keV {I5} (1971Ku25). 
RI$Other value: 11 (1970Lo02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 266.0 keV {i5} (1970Lo02), 266.0 keV (1987Ze07). 
RI$Other values: 1.3 (1970Lo02). I|g=2.1 {i3} (1987Ze07), relative to I|g(315|g)=14.2, renormalized by evaluators. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other value: 383.6 keV (1987Ze07). 
RI$Other value: 5.4 {i4} (1987Ze07), relative to I|g(315|g)=14.2, renormalized by evaluators. 
$A 369.5-keV |g transition, which observed by 1970Lo02 and placed between the 3- and the 2+ states, was absent in the spectra measured by 1987Ze07. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 117.7 keV {I2} (1993Ac02), 117.7 keV {I3} (1987Ze07), and 117.8 keV {I2} (1983Ha31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 177.5 keV {I2} (1993Ac02), 177.6 keV {I3} (1987Ze07), and 177.5 keV {I2} (1983Ha31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 230.9 keV {I2} (1998Ac02), 231.1 keV {I3} (1987Ze07) and 231.3 keV {I2} (1983Ha31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 278.0 keV {I2} (1993Ac02), 278.2 keV {I3} (1987Ze07), and 278.2 keV {I2} (1983Ha31). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 47.6 keV 1 (1963Bj03) and 47.65 keV 5 (1971Ka42). Other value: 47.6 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$From 1971Ka42 
M$(ce(L1) + ce(L2))/ce(L3)=1.2 (1963bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$From (ce(L1)+ce(L2))/ce(L3) mentioned in 1963Bj01. 
E$From 1970Va01. Other measurement: 109.0 keV 1 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 564 keV (1963Bj01), 563.2 keV 1 (1970Va01). 
M$ce(K)/ce(L) (563|g + 581|g)=6 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 584 keV (1963Bj01), 581.4 keV 1 (1970Va01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0078 (1970Va01), ce(K)/ce(L) (563|g + 581|g)=6 (1963Bj01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other values:819.1 keV 1 (1970Va01), 820 (1963Bj01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0127 (1970Va01), ce(K)/ce(L)=3.3 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 868 keV (1963Bj01), 866.7 keV 1 (1970Va01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0116 (1970Va01), ce(K)/ce(L)=3.5 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1970Va01. Other value: 757 keV (1963Bj01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.016 (1970Va01), ce(K)/ce(L)=3 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other value: 150.1 keV 1 (1970Va01, 1963Bj01). 
M$(ce(L1)+ce(L2))/ce(L3)=3.4, ce(K)/ce(L)=3.4 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 387.9 keV 1 (1970Va01), 388.0 keV 2 (1963Bj01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.068 (1970Va01), (ce(L1)+ce(L2))/ce(L3)=4.0, ce(K)/ce(L)=2.1 (1963Bj01). 
|a(K)exp=0.064 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 453.6 keV 1 (1970Va01), 454.2 keV 2 (1963Bj01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.068 (1970Va01). 
|a(K)exp=0.061 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 971 keV (1963Bj01), 969.2 keV 1 (1970Va01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0031 (1970Va01), ce(K)/ce(L)=5.4 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ka42. Other value: 1016.9 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.013 {I2} (1970Va01) and 0.016 {I4} (1971Ka42) 
M$|a(K)exp=0.059 {I19}, ce(K)/ce(L)=5.5 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$Weighted average of 80.27 keV 10 (1971Ka42) and 80.20 keV 10 (1963Bj01). Other value: 80.0 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$From 1971Ka42. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 895 keV (1963Bj01), 894.3 keV 1 (1970Va01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0038 (1970Va01), ce(K)/ce(L)=5.3 (1963Bj01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 1003.3 keV (1970Va01), 1003.3 kev 2 (1971Ka42). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.163 {I8} (1970Va01) and 0.17 {I1} (1971Ka42). 
M$|a(L)exp=0.00075 {I27}, ce(K)/ce(L)<11 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ka42. Other value: 1050.9 kev (1970Va01). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.018 {I2} (1970Va01) and 0.017 {I5} (1971Ka42). 
M$|a(L)exp<0.013 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ka42. Other value: 1085.2 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.026 {I2} (1970Va01) and 0.024 {I4} (1971Ka42). 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp<0.065. Decay scheme requires E2 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ka42. Other value: 1132.2 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.008 {I3} (1970Va01) and 0.014 {I4} (1971Ka42). 
M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp<0.02. Decay scheme requires E2 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Other values: 1125.0 keV (1970Va01), 1125.1 keV 2 (1971Ka42). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.223 {I10} (1970Va01) and 0.22 {I1} (1971Ka42). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.0026 {I4}, ce(K)/ce(L)=11 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ka42. Other value: 1055.4 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$Weighted average of 0.070 {I4} (1970Va01) and 0.076 {I4} (1971Ka42). 
M$|a(K)exp<0.013 (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1971Ka42. Other value: 1162 keV (1970Va01). 
RI$From 1971Ka42. Other value: |<0.005 (1970Va01). 
M$|a(K)exp=0.003 {I2} (1971Ka42). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 40.33 {I10} (2011Ko32), 40.349 {I5} (1990Ko41), 40.5 {I1} (1972De67), 40.35 {I1} (1961Al19, crystal), 40.47 {I10} (1952Br84) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0582 {I26} (2011Ko32), 0.085 {I11} (2004Sh07), 0.074 {I11} (2002Lu01), 0.056 {I4} (2000Wo01), 0.062 {I10} (1990Ko41), 0.10 {I2} (1973Va33) 
$Triple placement in 1985DeZR, but from other studies the main placement is from 40.3 level 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O+P=13:100:91:5:20:16:12:3.4 (1966Ze02), %E2=54 {I5} or |d=1.08 {I10}; L1:L2:M1:M2:M3:M4=14:100:4:39:29:2 (1962Sc03), %E2=54 {I4} or |d=1.08 {I+10-8}; L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=30:100:80:25:23 (1961Al19), %E2=30 {I10} or |d=0.65 {I16}; %E2=31 {I2} or |d=0.67 {I3} from ce data (1963Bi03); |d=1.23 from ce data (1959Al02). Other: 1985DeZR 
MR$deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code on all the L- and M-subshell ratios quoted above, assuming 20% uncertainty in each ratio 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 258.63 {I12} (2011Ko32), 258.45 {I2} (1990Ko41), 258.2 {I2} (1973Va33) 
RI$weighted average of 0.077 {I5} (2011Ko32), 0.071 {I8} (2000Sc04), 0.070 {I5} (1990Ko41). Other: 0.010 {I4} (1973Va33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 298.81 {I9} (2011Ko32), 298.81 {I2} (1990Ko41), 298.89 {I20} (1973Va33) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.357 {I13} (2011Ko32), 0.39 {I8} (2002Lu01), 0.223 {I18} (1990Ko41). Weighted average is 0.31 {I5} but reduced |h{+2}=19. Other: 0.09 (1973Va33) 
$Observed by 1973Va33 in |g|g-coin 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 301.85 {I12} (2011Ko32), 301.99 {I10} (1990Ko41) 
RI$unweighted average of 0.045 {I5} (2011Ko32), 0.026 {I5} (1990Ko41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 271.57 {I8} (2011Ko32), 271.555 {I10} (1990Ko41), 271.48 {I8} (1971Vo02, crystal), 271.58 {I4} (1971Cl03), 271.62 {I23} (1961Al19, crystal) 
RI$weighted average of 0.847 {I26} (2011Ko32), 0.77 {I15} (2004Sh07), 0.855 {I13} (2002Lu01), 0.839 {I10} (2000Sc04), 0.834 {I8} (2000Wo01), 0.88 {I4} (1990Ko41), 0.828 {I26} (1984Va27), 0.85 {I3} (1979Ge08), 0.79 {I8} (1973Va33) 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M1+M2=100:21:84:35:33 (1966Ze02); K:L2:L3:M2=100:75:19:38 (1962Sc03); K:L1:L3=100:98:|?7 (1961Al19); E2 in all including ce in 1963Bi03. Others: 1985DeZR, 1959Al02 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 311.94 {I5} (2011Ko32), 311.904 {I5} (1990Ko41), 311.887 {I10} (1971Cl03), 311.98 {I3} (1971Vo02, crystal), 311.91 {I13} (1961Al19, crystal). Other: 312.17 {I12} (1988Wo01), seems somewhat discrepant 
RI$100.0 {I21} (2011Ko32), 100.0 {I8} (2008De10), 100 {I6} (2004Sh07), 100.0 {I6} (2002Lu01), 100.0 {I10} (2000Sc04), 100.0 {I10} (2000Wo01), 100.0 {I10} (1990Ko41), 100 {I5} (1988Wo01), 100.0 {I10} (1984Va27), 100 (1979Ge08), 100 (1973Va33) 
M,CC$from measured |a(K)exp, |a(L1+L2)exp and |a(M1)exp (1989Br24). Deduced penetration parameter |l=2.3 {I4} (1989Br24), assuming pure M1. 
$K:L1:L2:M:N:O=100:17:2.0:4.3:1.1:0.3 (1966Ze02); K:L1:L2:M:N=100:15:1.5:4.3:1.1 (1962Sc03); K:L1:L2:M:N:O=100:17:1.6:3.7:1.7:0.4; K/L=1653 {I82}/311 {I28} (1988Wo01). M1 in 1963Bi03 and 1959Al02 from ce; %E2<1.6 (1966Ze02), <3 (1962Sc03), <2 (1961Al19). Other: |d=0.26 {I2} (1985DeZR). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 280.37 {I14} (2011Ko32), 280.61 {I5} (1990Ko41) 
RI$weighted average of 0.0370 {I26} (2011Ko32), 0.028 {I5} (1990Ko41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average (NRM) of 28.57 {I8} (2011Ko32), 28.559 {I10} (1990Ko41), 28.6 {I1} (1972De67), 28.54 {I3} (1961Al19, crystal), 28.67 {I2} (1952Br84). Other: 28.375 {I5} (1988Wo01), seems discrepant. 
RI$weighted average of 0.198 {I11} (2011Ko32), 0.194 {I21} (1990Ko41), 0.180 {I24} (1988Wo01), 0.18 {I2} (1973Va33). Others: 0.051 {I5} (2004Sh07), 0.090 {I26} (2002Lu01), 0.388 {I26} (1984Va27); all seem discrepant. 
$L1/(M1+M2)=2.7 {I3} (1990Pe16); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O+P=51.6:26.2:20.0:8.3:4.3:3.1:4.8:1.4 (1966Ze02), %E2=2.4 {I2} or |d=0.16 {I1}; L3:M2:M3=9.3:4.7:3.1 (1962Sc03), %E2=1.02 {I8} or |d=0.10 {I1}; M1:M2:M3=8.0:2.9:3.1 (1961Al19), %E2=3.0 {I5} or |d=0.18 {I1}; M1:M2:N+=88 {I21}:64 {I30}:40.6 {I51} (1988Wo01); %E2=2% {I1} or |d=0.14 {I3} in 1963Bi03 from ce; %E2=4 or |d=0.20 (1959Al02) from ce. Others: |d=0.14 {I1} (1985DeZR) 
MR$deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code on all the L- and M-subshell ratios given above, assuming 20% uncertainty on the ratio when not given. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 41.65 {I10} (2011Ko32), 41.663 {I10} (1990Ko41), 41.65 {I2} (1961Al19, crystal). 
RI$weighted average of 0.0344 {I27} (2011Ko32), 0.036 {I8} (1990Ko41), 0.035 {I10} (1973Va33) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 248.35 {I12} (2011Ko32), 248.38 {I4} (1990Ko41), 248.0 {I2} (1973Va33), 248.69 {I24} (1968Ma13), 248.3 {I3} (1967Br20). 
RI$weighted average of 0.164 {I11} (2011Ko32), 0.151 {I16} (2002Lu01), 0.161 {I3} (2000Sc04), 0.157 {I3} (2000Wo01), 0.150 {I10} (1990Ko41), 0.155 {I26} (1984Va27), 0.154 {I6} (1979Ge08). Other: 0.010 {I3} (1973Va33) 
$K, L2, L3, M2, N2 lines seen in ce (1985DeZR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 300.16 {I6} (2011Ko32), 300.129 {I5} (1990Ko41), 300.12 {I3} (1971Vo02, crystal), 300.124 {I20} (1971Cl03), 300.20 {I24} (1961Al19, crystal). Other: 300.34 {I2} (1988Wo01), seems discrepant 
RI$weighted average of 16.88 {I50} (2011Ko32), 16.99 {I13} (2008De10), 16.8 {I5} (2004Sh07), 16.90 {I16} (2002Lu01), 17.01 {I18} (2000Sc04), 17.21 {I16} (2000Wo01), 17.67 {I18} (1990Ko41), 17.2 {I12} (1988Wo01), 17.18 {I16} (1984Va27), 17.14 {I15} (1979Ge08), 17.2 {I8} (1973Va33) 
M,CC$from |a(K)exp and |a(L1+L2)exp (1989Br24). Deduced penetration parameter |l=2.6 {I9} (1989Br24), assuming pure M1. 
$K:L1:L2:M1+M2:N=100:16:1.9:4.6:1.1 (1966Ze02), |d=0; K:L1:L2:M1:N1=100:15:1.3:3.8:1.5 (1962Sc03), |d<0.18; K:L1:L2:M1:N1=100:16:2.3:4.4:1.4 (1961Al19), |d=0.37 {I+16-23} K/L=301 {I13}/53.4 {I73} (1988Wo01). M1 in 1963Bi03 and 1959Al02 from ce. Other: |d=0.16 {I2} (1985DeZR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 340.55 {I12} (2011Ko32), 340.476 {I5} (1990Ko41), 340.50 {I4} (1971Vo02, crystal), 340.47 {I2} (1971Cl03), 340.51 {I18} (1961Al19, crystal). Other: 340.81 {I3} (1988Wo01), seems discrepant 
RI$weighted average of 11.46 {I37} (2011Ko32), 11.65 {I9} (2008De10), 11.6 {I12} (2004Sh07), 11.67 {I8} (2002Lu01), 11.69 {I13} (2000Sc04), 11.68 {I10} (2000Wo01), 10.92 {I13} (1990Ko41), 11.7 {I13} (1988Wo01), 11.69 {I13} (1984Va27), 11.57 {I10} (1979Ge08), 11.7 {I12} (1973Va33). Uncertainty was doubled in 1990Ko41 in the averaging procedure. 
M,CC$from |a(K)exp, |a(L12)exp and |a(M1)exp (1989Br24). Deduced penetration parameter |l=2.4 {I8} (1989Br24), assuming pure M1. 
$K:L1:L2:M:N:O=100:16:2.1:4.6:1.4:0.4 (1966Ze02), |d<0.25; K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O=100:17:1.0:0.2:3.5:1.4:0.2 (1962Sc03), |d=0.29 {I9}; K:L1:L2:M:N=100:22:2.8:7.0:2.8 (1961Al19), |d=0.3 {I+2-3}; M1 in 1963Bi03 and 1959Al02 from ce data. Other: |d=0.4 {I1} (1985DeZR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 288.17 {I13} (2011Ko32), 288.42 {I10} (1990Ko41). 
RI$weighted average of 0.053 {I5} (2011Ko32), 0.041 {I8} (1990Ko41). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$L2 and L3 conversion lines reported by 1961Al19, but no intensities were given. 1962Sc03 reported Ice(L3)=0.2 relative to Ice(K)=100 for 311.9|g. Using theoretical K-conversion coefficient of 0.71 {I1} for 311.9|g and L3 conversion coefficient of 57.4 {I13} for 57.9-keV transition (with assumed uncertainty of 0.2 keV), I|g(57.9)=0.0024. 1973Va33 reported I|g<0.01. 
CC$assuming |DE|g=0.2 keV 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 86.57 {I5} (2011Ko32), 86.595 {I5} (1990Ko41), 86.58 {I3} (1972De67), 86.59 {I1} (1961Al19, crystal). Others: 86.814 {I3} (1988Wo01, seems discrepant), 87.0 {I3} (1952Br84) 
RI$weighted average of 5.34 {I19} (2011Ko32), 6.9 {I6} (2002Lu01), 4.99 {I28} (1990Ko41), 4.9 {I7} (1988Wo01), 5.1 {I3} (1979Ge08), 4.9 {I6} (1973Va33) 
$(86.6|g)(311.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.008 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I5} (liquid,1986Kr10) 
$(86.6|g)(311.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.006 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.003 {I5} (solid,1986Kr10); A{-2}=-0.008 {I4} (liquid), -0.005 {I3} (solid), for assumed A{-4}=0 (1986Kr10) 
$L1:L2:M1:M2:N1:O=100:12:25:3.3:6.9:1.7 (1966Ze02), |d<0.08; L1:L2:M1:M2:N1:O=100:7:22:2.3:4.4:1.5 (1962Sc03), |d<0.05; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1:O=100:14:3:28:6.2:6.9:1.7 (1961Al19), |d=0.14 {I2}; L1:L2:L3=573 {I14}:105.0 {I98}:34 {I16} (1988Wo01); |d=0.10 {I+4-10} in 1963Bi03 and |d<0.1 in 1959Al02 from ce data. Other: 1985DeZR 
MR$deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code on all the L- and M-subshell ratios, assuming 20% uncertainty on ratio when not given. This values agrees with <0.1 based on |g|g(|q) data in 1986Kr10. Other: 0.07 {I1} (1985DeZR) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 398.58 {I12} (2011Ko32), 398.492 {I5} (1990Ko41), 398.62 {I8} (1971Vo02), 398.49 {I2} (1971Cl03), 398.57 {I40} (1961Al19, crystal). 
RI$unweighted average of 3.52 {I13} (2011Ko32), 3.55 {I27} (2004Sh07), 3.685 {I34} (2002Lu01), 3.652 {I39} (2000Sc04), 3.636 {I28} (2000Wo01), 3.29 {I5} (1990Ko41), 3.70 {I5} (1984Va27), 3.60 {I3} (1979Ge08), 3.35 {I40} (1973Va33). Weighted average is 3.61 {I4}, but reduced |h{+2} is 6.4. 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=100:17:38:11:11:5 (1966Ze02); K:L1:L2:L3=100:22:37:13(1962Sc03); L2/L3=100/31 (1961Al19); E2 in 1966Ze02, 1963Bi03, 1962Sc03 and 1961Al19 from ce data. Other: 1985DeZR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Transition seen in conversion electron spectra by 1961Al19, 1962Sc03 and 1966Ze02. 
RI$deduced from Ice(M1+M2)=5.4 relative to Ice(K)=100, and |a(K)=0.710 {I10} for 311.9|g (1962Sc03), and |a(M1+M2)(theory)=151 {I40} for transition energy of 17.26 keV {I4} and |d(E2/M1)=0.13 {I2}. Uncertainty of 25% is assumed in measured Ice(M1+M2). 
E$from observation of M1, M2, M3, N1 and N2 conversion lines by 1961Al19. Uncertainty is not given in 1961Al19. However, from the spread of energies of several conversion lines, it is estimated as 0.04 keV. Other: 17.2 (1962Sc03, from M1 and M2 lines) 
MR$from M1:M2:M3=20:18:16 (1966Ze02), assuming 25% uncertainty in the subshell ratios. Others: M1/M2=2.0/3.4, 8% {I5} E2 or |d=0.30 {I+8-12} (1962Sc03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 75.26 {I5} (2010Ko27), 75.269 (1991Ko41), 75.27 {I3} (1972De67), 75.28 {I1} (1961Al19, crystal), 75.4 {I2} (1952Br84). Uncertainty is not given in 1990Ko41, assumed by evaluators as 0.010 in averaging, based on uncertainties in this for other |g rays. 
RI$unweighted average of 3.36 {I13} (2011Ko32), 3.01 {I10} (2004Sh07), 3.360 {I21} (2002Lu01), 3.59 {I10} (2000Sc04), 3.62 {I7} (2000Wo01), 3.26 {I23} (1990Ko41), 3.27 {I24} (1988Wo01), 3.36 {I10} (1984Va27), 3.6 {I2} (1979Ge08), 3.26 {I20} (1973Va33). Weighted average is 3.39 {I5}, but reduced |h{+2} is 3.6. 
MR$other: 0.090 {I5} (1985DeZR) from ce data 
$(75.27|g)(300.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.008 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.015 {I15} (liquid,1986Kr10) 
$(75.27|g)(300.1|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.001 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.019 {I14} (solid,1986Kr10); A{-2}=+0.010 {I10} (liquid), +0.003 {I9} (solid), for assumed A{-4}=0 (1986Kr10) 
$(75.27|g)(340.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.140 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I13} (liquid,1986Kr10) 
$(75.27|g)(340.5|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.128 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.022 {I19} (solid,1986Kr10); A{-2}=-0.133 {I9} (liquid), -0.123 {I11} (solid) for assumed A{-4}=0 (1986Kr10) 
$(75.27|g)[28.6|g](311.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.014 {I13}, A{-4}=0.000 {I18} (liquid,1986Kr10); A{-2}=-0.015 {I13} (liquid) for assumed A{-4}=0 (1986Kr10) 
$L1:L2:L3:N:O+=550 {I18}:58.4 {I45}:36.9 {I52}:<0.14:9.8 {I19} (1988Wo01); L1:L2:M1:M2:N1:O=100:12:22:3:7:1.5 (1966Ze02), |d<0.07; L1:L2:M1:M2:N1=100:6:19:2:5 (1962Sc03), |d<0.02; L1:L2:M1:N1:O=100:14:24:8:3 (1961Al19), |d=0.10 {I1}; M1 in 1963Bi03 from ce data. Other: 1985DeZR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 103.84 {I8} (2010Ko27), 103.860 {I10} (1991Ko41), 103.862 {I10} (1971Cl03), 103.86 {I2} (1961Al19, crystal) 
RI$weighted average of 2.25 {I8} (2011Ko32), 2.20 {I7} (2004Sh07), 2.262 {I16} (2002Lu01), 2.192 {I44} (2000Sc04), 2.204 {I21} (2000Wo01), 2.22 {I16} (1990Ko41), 1.90 {I24} (1988Wo01), 2.25 {I8} (1984Va27), 2.25 {I8} (1979Ge08), 1.92 {I20} (1973Va33). 
MR$other: 0.15 {I1} from ce data (1985DeZR) 
$(103.86|g)(311.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.005 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.008 {I8} (liquid,1986Kr10) 
$(103.86|g)(311.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.001 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.012 {I8} (solid,1986Kr10); A{-2}=+0.002 {I5} (liquid), +0.001 {I4} (solid) FOR A{-4}=0 (1986Kr10) 
$L1:L2:M1:M2:M3:N:O=100:15:24:4.2:1.2:7.0:1.6 (1966Ze02), |d=0.14 {I7}; L1:L2:M1:M2:N:O=100:7:24:7.1:4.7:1.2 (1962Sc03), |d<0.17; L1:L2:L3:M1:N=100:18:4:30:13 (1961Al19), |d=0.20 {I3}; 1% {I1} E2 or |d=0.10 {I+4-10} in 1963Bi03, and |d<0.1 (1959Al02) from ce. Other: 1985DeZR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 375.48 {I16} (2010Ko27), 375.404 {I5} (1990Ko41), 375.45 {I4} (1971Vo02, crystal), 375.40 {I5} (1971Cl03), 375.35 {I32} (1961Al19, crystal) 
RI$weighted average of 1.75 {I8} (2011Ko32), 1.55 {I21} (2004Sh07), 1.817 {I16} (2002Lu01), 1.782 {I18} (2000Sc04), 1.783 {I16} (2000Wo01), 1.604 {I26} (1990Ko41), 1.785 {I26} (1984Va27), 1.76 {I2} (1979Ge08), 1.6 {I3} (1973Va33). Uncertainty was doubled in 1990Ko41 in the averaging procedure. 
$L3:M1:M2=15.8 {I23}:40.9 {I22}:<0.32 (1988Wo01); K:L1:L2:L3:M1+M2:N=100:20:46:16:16:11 (1966Ze02); K:L2:L3:M2:N2=100:70:22:4:2 (1962Sc03); E2 in all including 1963Bi03 from ce data. Other: 1985DeZR 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 415.87 {I12} (2011Ko32), 415.764 {I5} (1990Ko41), 415.76 {I4} (1971Vo02, crystal), 415.78 {I2} (1971Cl03), 415.87 {I42} (1961Al19, crystal). 
RI$weighted average of 4.44 {I16} (2011Ko32), 4.53 {I5} (2008De10), 4.24 {I27} (2004Sh07), 4.603 {I19} (2002Lu01), 4.58 {I5} (2000Sc04), 4.576 {I36} (2000Wo01), 4.50 {I5} (1984Va27), 4.52 {I4} (1979Ge08), 4.2 {I4} (1973Va33). Other: 4.11 {I5} (1990Ko41), seems discrepant. 
RI$most of the intensity belongs with placement from 415.77 level 
$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=100:22:14:4:9.1:3.2 (1966Ze02), |d=1.78 {I15}; K:L2:L3:M2=100:43:6.5:13 (1962Sc03), |d=4.9 {I+|@-15}; K:L1:L2:L3=100:22:16:3.8 (1961Al19), |d=2.1 {I+7-4}; 78% {I8} E2 or |d=1.9 {I5} in 1963Bi03 from ce. Other: 1985DeZR 
MR$deduced by evaluators using BrIccMixing code on ce data listed above from 1966Ze02, 1962Sc03 and 1961Al19, except the L2/K ratio from 1962Sc03 which seems discrepant. Uncertainty of 20% was assumed in each ratio. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$299.1 {I3} for the unresolved doublet in |e decay 
RI$84 {I4} was observed for the doublet at 299 keV. The two components are placed from 299 and 340 levels. Intensity divided by evaluators based on the following branching ratios in the Adopted dataset: 340 level: I|g(300)/I|g(340)=1.474 {I21}, which give I|g=11.6 {I6} for placement from 340 level. Remaining intensity (84 {I4}-11.6 {I6}) of 72 {I4} should belong to 299|g from 299 level, which is consistent with 63 {I7} obtained from I|g(299)/I|g(258)=4.48 {I36}, but somewhat more precise. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$see comment for 299.1|g from the 299 level for division of the intensity of the 299|g doublet. 
E$299.1 {I3} for the unresolved doublet in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=LT;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W;ERR=LT
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E this |g-ray transition was not observed; its existence has been inferred in 6.70-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. E|g is from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 513.4|g has been assumed to be a doublet, feeding the 4+ and 3- levels at 1023.7 and 1023.83 keV (both the 3+, 5+ members of the K|p=2+ band, and the 4-, 5- members of the K|p=2- band are populated from the 1537-keV level). See 6.70-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay data for the splitting of the measured intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E 43.498 {I1} from {+238}Pu |a decay. 
M Ice(L2)=33%; L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(N+O+P)=1.5:33:27:0.5:11:9:7.8 
An intensity balance at the 43.486-KEV level yields TI(43.49G)=88 and IG(43.49G)= 88/(1 + 713)=0.12, in excellent agreement with experimental IG=0.12 1. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
Ice(L2)=6.0%; K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:(N+O)=8:6:60:30:15:10:11 
I|g(152.7|g)=0.0083 {I3} per 100 {+234}Th decay (1990Sc09). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(810|g)/I|g(766|g)=2.7 {I10}, average of 3.5 (from {+238}Pu |a decay), 1.7 (from {+234}Pa(1.159 min) |b{+-} decay), |?2.9 (from {+234}Np |e decay). 
M from 1.17-min {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
Ice(K)=0.15%; total Ice=0.19% {I6} from K/LMN=3.5, as measured in {+238}Pu |a and {+234}Np |e decays. 
E measured by 1968Bj06 (s ce). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level scheme. This intraband transition was not observed. It is expected from intensity balance at the 809.88- and 851.70-keV levels. 
I(|g+ce)=0.15 {I7}% assuming no |b feeding to the 0+, 809.88-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from adopted gammas; this transition was not observed in {+234}Pa(6.70-h) |b{+-} decay. 
RI calculated by the evaluators from adopted branching for 708.3|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from {+238}Pu |a decay. E|g=926.7 {I1} (1986Ar05), E|g=927.1 (1968Bj06). 
RI from I|g(926.7|g)/I|g(883.2|g)=0.75 {I8} in {+238}Pu |a decay. Excess of measured intensity, I|g(926.7|g)=8.7 {I5}, has been assigned to the 926-keV |g ray from the 1069-keV level. 
Ice(K)=0.11%; Ice(L)(926.7|g+926.0|g)=0.07%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
CC calculated from I|g and Ice. Total ce intensity has been deduced from measured Ice(K) by assuming K/(L+M+N)=3.5, as measured for the 809.8 E0 transition in {+238}Pu |a decay. (Ice(K) from the E2 component is expected to be 0.005; therefore, the observed ce intensity is all due to the E0 component of the transition.) 
Ice(K)=0.18%, Ice(L)<0.14% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Ice(L1)=0.4%; L1:L2:L3=4:6:|<4. Contributions from conversion electrons of 140.91|g [E1] are expected to be negligible: Ice(L1)=0.006, Ice(L2)=Ice(L3)=0.003. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
CC E2, theory. 
E measured by 1968Bj06 (s ce). 
If the transition were E2, the measured Ice's and |a(M2)(E2 theory)=223.8, |a(M3)(E2 theory)=219.5 would yield I|g|?0.0036%. 
Ice(M2)=Ice(M3)=0.8%; M2:M3:N2:N3=8:8:3:3 (1968Bj06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$880|g is a doublet comprised of the following components: ig1([E2], 1023.94 (4+) to 143 (4+)) and ig2([E1], 1023.78 (3-) to 143 (4+)). Ig1 + ig2=10.1 {I6} (1986Ar05). Using Ice(K)=0.080% {I24} (1968Bj06), |a(K) (theory, E2)=0.01046 and |a(K) (theory, E1)=0.00382 one obtains ig1|?6 and ig2|?4. 
Other measured intensities for the doublet are: 20 {I3} (1967Wa26), 10.8 {I5} (1968Go20), 13.3 (1975Ar24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI determined by 1968Bj06 from |g|g coincidence data. I|g(980.3|g)=1.92 {I10} is reported in 1986Ar05, which does not agree well with the other measured intensities for the doublet: 3.7 (1967Wa09), 3.2 {I2} (1968Go20), 3.4 (1975Ar24). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from level scheme. 
I|g(926.0|g+926.72|g)=8.7 {I5} (1986Ar05); I|g|?4 was deduced by 1968Bj06 from |g|g-coincidence data. See 926.72|g for the method used to obtain I|g(926.0|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Total ce intensity is Ice|?0.018 from Ice(233.6|g)/I|g(942|g)|?0.4, which disagrees with Ice|?0.1 from Ice(233.6|g)/I|g(1085|g)|?5 from {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
I|g=0.0015 {I6} from adopted |g branching for 235.9|g and I|g(942|g); I|g=0.0044 {I25} if I|g(1085) is used. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
I|g(299|g)/I|g(942|g)=0.085 {I10} was measured in {+234}Np |e decay, 0.10 {I3} in {+238}Pu |a decay, 0.26 {I6} in 1.17- min {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay; this ratio is 0.30 {I13} here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
I|g(1085|g)/I|g(942|g)=0.077 {I17} measured in {+234}Np |e decay, 0.16 {I4} in {+234}Pa(1.159-min) |b{+-} decay, and 0.20 {I3} in {+238}Pu |a decay; this ratio is 0.59 {I19} in {+234}Pa (6.70-h) |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from (|a,2n|g); this transition was not seen in {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 
M determined in (|a,2n|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2+M1)
decay_comment:
Ice(K)=2%; K:L2:M1=2:<0.1:0.3, I(|g+ce)|?3%. 
The ratio of I|g(199|g)/I|g(1083|g)=0.64 {I20} obtained in {+234}Pa(1.159-min) |b{+-} decay does not agree with the ratio of 0.14 {I5} deduced here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
I|g(275|g)/I|g(1083|g)=0.35 {I10} and I|g(275|g)/I|g(1126|g)=0.58 {I19}, from {+234}Pa (1.159-min) |b{+-} decay, yield I|g(275|g)=0.17 {I5} for the 275|g deexciting the 1126-keV level, which compares with I|g(275|g)|?0.3, measured by 1968Bj06 in a coincidence experiment. The 275.04|g was placed by 1986Ar05 to deexcite only the level at 1447 keV. Its measured intensity of I|g(275|g)=0.09 {I2} suggests that this 275|g deexciting the 1447-keV level is probably weaker. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E From 1968Bj06 (s ce). 
I|g=0.0083 {I26} from |a(L2)(E2 theory)=69.8 and measured Ice(L2). I|g<0.009 was reported by 1986Ar05. 
Ice(L2)=0.6%; Ice(L3)=0.4% (corrected for the contribution from M3(45.19|g); Ice(L3 58|g)+Ice(M3 45|g)=1.0 was measured). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Ice(K 1121.7|g+K 1125.2|g+K 1126.8|g)=0.009%; Ice(L 1121.8|g+L 1125.2|g+L 1126.8|g)|<0.0038%. |a(K)exp(1121.7|g)=0.024 from measured Ice(K) and |a(K)(1126.8|g; E2)=0.00687 and |a(K)(1125.2; E1)=0.00306. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level scheme. This in-band transition was not observed; it is added in the level scheme with I(|g+ce)=0.036% {I7} for an intensity balance at the 1237-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
Ice(L3 140.15|g)+Ice(L1 143.78|g)=0.4%; Ice(L3 140.15|g)=0.22 {I18} from |a(L3)(140.15|g; |d=1.2 {I6})=0.45 {I+11-25}, and therefore, Ice(L1 143.78|g)|?0.2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
Because of the coincidence observed with a 946-keV |g-ray gate, 1986Ar05 placed this transition also between the 4+ level at 1882 keV and the 3- level at 1722 keV. Considering the main configurations of the 1882- and 1722- keV levels, a |g-ray transition between them should be forbidden. Although probable configuration mixings in either or both levels would permit the transition, its intensity (being proportional to the square of mixing amplitude) would be quite weak. An alternative explanation for the observed 159|g-946|g coincidence may be a possible 67.2|g connecting the 1261-keV and 1194-keV levels. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Ice(K)=5%; K:L1:L3:M1:N1=50:12:2:4:1. 
IG(226.95G)=0.0167 3 per 100 234TH decays was measured by 1990Sc09, corresponding to 10.4% of 6.70-h 234PA decays. The disagreement could be due to a contaminant. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
A 468.0|g with I|g=(1.00 {I9})[I|g(1414|g)] observed in {+234}Pa(1.159-min) |b{+-} decay has been placed elsewhere. The intensity of the 468.0-keV |g ray seen in {+234}Pa(6.70-h) decay has been assigned by the evaluators mostly to the 468.0|g deexciting the 1537-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
I|g(330.40|g)=0.75 {I5} was measured by 1986Ar05 for this doubly placed |g ray. 
Ice(K)=0.2%; Ice(L1+L2)|<0.08%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Ice(K 568.9|g+569.5|g)=1.5%, Ice(L1)<0.50. 
IG=0.0203 3 per 100 234TH decays (corresponding to 12.7% 6.70-min 234PA decays) was measured by 1990Sc09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI this transition is assumed to be a doublet, feeding the 4+ and 3- levels at 1023.7 and 1023.83 keV. The measured intensity of I|g(513.4 doublet)=1.10 {I7} has been divided by the evaluators by using the theoretical K- conversion coefficients of |a(K)(M1 theory)=0.1974, |a(K)(E1 theory)=0.01035, and the measured electron intensity of Ice(K 513|g)=0.08. 
The ratio of the theoretical |g-ray reduced transition probabilities of the 513.4-and 409.8-keV E1 transitions to the 3-, 4- members of the K=2- band, respectively, yields I|g(513.4|g; E1)=1.47 {I14}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
The ratio of the theoretical reduced transition probabilities of the 568.9- and 513.4-keV |g rays to the 3+ and 4+ members of the K=2+ band, respectively, and I|g(568.9|g)=3.5 {I4} yield I|g(513.4|g; M1)=1.5 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2,M1]
decay_comment:
Because of a poor fit to the level scheme, the uncertainty on E|g has been increased to 1.0 keV. Uncertainty=0.1 keV is listed in 1986Ar05. E|g=589.4 {I4} from adopted level energies. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
Ice(L1)=0.8%; L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=8:4:3:2:2. 
IG(131.3G)=0.0286 4 per 100 234TH decays (in equilibrium with 238U, its parent nucleus) was measured by 1990Sc09. This value has been used by the evaluator to obtain IT BRANCHING of 1.17-min 234PA isomeric state. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placement of 657.4|g between 1619-keV level (J|p=6+, K=5) and the 962-keV level (J|p=5-, K=0 octupole band) was suggested by 1986Ar05 from (99|g)(|g) coincidences observed. No analogous transition was seen from the 5+ member of the K=5 band to any of the K=0 octupole-vibrational band states. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
Placed by 1986Ar05 between 4+ state at 1927.6 keV and 4- state (K=3) at 1761.7 keV. No |g ray decaying to the 3- bandhead of this K=3 band was observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
Placed by 1986Ar05 between 4+ state at 1927.6 keV and 6+ state at 1619.5 keV (K=5); no |g ray decaying to the 5+ bandhead of this K=5 band was observed. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Placed by 1986Ar05 between 4+ state at 1940 keV and 4+ state (K=2) at 1023.7 keV; no |g rays decaying to the 3+, 2+ band members of this K=2 band were observed 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From {+238}Pu |a decay. 
Ice(L2)=250; L2:L3:M=25:27:34 (1963Bj02). 
TI from measured ICE's, total ICE=980 which yields an intensity imbalance of -0.39% 15 at the 43.498 level. 
RI=0.90 9 and 1.11 12 from L2 and L3-subshell conversion electrons and theoretical conversion coefficients, respectively; 1.35 14 from deduced total ICE=980 and the total conversion coefficient; from intensity balance, TI=1370 and RI=1.89 4. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI Deduced by the evaluators from intensity balance at the 143-KEV level. 
M$From 234Pa g.s. decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2000Ni13. Other intensity results: I|g=95.8 {I4} (1975Ar23), I|g=106.6 {I24} (1971GuZQ), I|g=117 {I2} (1986Mo09). 
E From 1972Sa06. 
Ice(K)<1 (not observed). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI$I(|g+ce)=850 from Ice(811)/I|g(1001)=0.51/0.60=0.85 (1963Bj02) 
E From 1963Bj02 (s ce). 809.8 from {+234}Np |e decay, and 810.0 {I7} from 6.75-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 
Total ICE=510 51 from ICE(K)=400; K:L:M:N=400:78:27:5. 
Total ICE(811)/RI(766G)=1.73 19 was measured; this ratio is 3.5 in 238PU A DECAY, and 2.9 5 in 234NP EC decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
Transition was not observed; its existence is inferred in 6.75-h 234PA B- decay. 
TI=12 8 (and RI=0.014 8, CC[E2]=876) from TI(41.82G)/TI(808G)=0.8 5, deduced in 234PA GS B- decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI Deduced by evaluators from I|g(783.4|g)/I|g(926.7|g)=0.29 {I3}/9.3 {I6}=0.031 {I4} in {+234}Pa g.s. decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$From 1975Ar23. I|g=20.5 {I7} (1971GuZQ) and I|g=22.2 {I2} (1990Sc09) significantly disagree with value from 1975Ar23, probably due to source contamination. 
M from {+234}Pa g.s. decay. 
E measured by 1972Sa06 from decays of 6.75-h and 1.17-min {+234}Pa in equilibrium with {+238}U source. 
Measured intensity for the (883.24G+883.2G) peak was 3.5 3 (1975Ar23). The adopted intensity ratio of RI(883.24G)/RI(926.8G)=100 7/70 8 is used by the evaluator to deduce the 883.24G deexciting the 926.74-KEV level. 
I|g(883)/I|g(926)=1.3 {I1} from {+238}Pu |a decay compares with I|g(883)/I|g(926)=1.10 {I3} from {+234}Pa(1.159 min) |b{+-} decay suggesting most of its intensity de-excites the 927-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI$From 1975Ar23. I|g=20.5 {I12} (1971GuZQ) and I|g=20.6 {I2} (1990Sc09) significantly disagree with value from 1975Ar23, probably due to source contamination. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI Deduced by evaluators from the ratios of I|g(62.70|g)/I|g(203|g)=1.5 {I4}/1.19 {I10} and I|g(62.70|g)/I|g(946|g)=1.5 {I4}/13.0 {I8}, in {+234}Pa g.s. |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g=0.42 {I10} is expected from I|g(140|g)/I|g(203|g) =49 {I5}/119 {I10}, I|g=0.37 {I6} from I|g(140|g)/I|g(945|g) =0.49 {I5}/13.0 {I8}, measured in {+234}Pa g.s. decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI$From 1975Ar23. I|g=30.2 {I7} (1971GuZQ) and I|g=28.2 {I3} (1990Sc09) significantly disagree with value from 1975Ar23, probably due to source contamination. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI=0.85 17 was measured by 1975Ar23 for the doubly placed 193.4G. The RI's of GAMMA's deexciting the 1044.53 and the 1237.24 levels are calculated by the evaluator such that RI(193G of 1044 level)/RI(1001G) for 1.17-min 234PA B- decay= RI(193G of 1044 level)/RI(1001G) for 234NP EC decay; and RI(193G of 1237 level))/RI(1194G) for 1.17-min 234PA B- decay= RI(193G of 1237 level))/RI(1194G) for 234NP EC decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E measured by 1963Bj02 (s ce). E|g=234.6 {I2} was measured in {+234}Np decay. 
Total Ice=87 {I9} from measured Ice(K)=70 and K/L=70/13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E,RI$From 2000Ni13. Other intensity results: I|g=97 {I4} (1975Ar23), I|g=87 {I2} (1971GuZQ), I|g=87 {I4} (1986Mo09). 
Ice(K)<5 (not observed). 
RI other measured IG's: 57 15 (1967Wa09), 80.9 {I33} (1975Ar23). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E measurement of 1972Sa06. 
Ice(K)=5.7. 
Absolute photon intensities were measured in equilibrium with its parents, 238U and 234TH (given per 100 234TH decays): IG(1001G)=0.828 9 (1971GuZY); 0.834 7 (1986Mo09); 0.839 5 (1990Sc09); 0.788 43 (1992Li05); 0.845 21 (1992Si17). Weighted average: 0.837 4; unweighted average: 0.837 10 (adopted). Earlier absolute measurement: IG=0.590 per 100 1.17-min 234PA B- decays (1963Bj02). Added in proof: IG=0.818 30 (1992Ja17). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI deduced by evaluators from branching of I|g(235.9|g)/I|g(942|g)=0.034 {I13}, adopted from measurements in {+238}Pu |a decay and {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI I|g(299|g)/I|g(942|g)=0.10 {I3} from {+238}Pu |a decay, 0.085 {I10} from {+234}Np |e decay, 0.30 {I13} from 6.75-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay, and 0.26 {I6} here. The adopted ratio of 0.10 {I3} yields I|g(299.0|g)=0.25 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2+M1)
decay_comment:
I|g(199.9|g)/I|g(1082|g)=0.14 {I5} from 6.75-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay, 0.64 {I20} here. Use of the ratio from 6.75-h {+234}Pa decay yields I|g(199.9|g)=0.12 {I5}. Since accuracy and correctness of a conversion coefficient rely on the measured I|g and Ice values, because of the uncertainty on I|g's, no conversion coefficient has been adopted, and I(|g+ce)|?5% [deduced from I(|g+ce)(199.9|g)/I|g(1082|g)|?5.9 in {+234}Pa g.s. decay data] has been used for obtaining the I|b value. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI 4.0 {I5} was measured for this doubly-placed |g. I|g(leaving 1126 level)=0.53 {I3}, deduced by the evaluators from I|g(1126|g)/I|g(1082|g)=29 {I3}/49 {I3} in {+234}Pa g.s. |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI 1.70 {I17} was measured for this doubly placed |g. I|g=0.465 {I20} has been deduced by the evaluators for the 387.6|g deexciting the 1237-keV level. 
CC if the 184.7|g (decays to 2- state) is M1, then, J|p(1174 level)=1-, and the 387.6|g (which decays to 1- state) should be M1,E2. |a(M1)=0.529, |a(E2)=0.0917, |a(E1)=0.0228. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI the intensity is calculated. See the comment for RI(193G leaving 1044.53 level) for the method of dividing the measured intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI Deduced by the evaluators from I|g(247.79|g)/I|g(1193.77|g)=0.109 {I7}/6.02 {I24} in {+234}Np |e decay. I|g=1.14 {I25} was measured by 1975Ar23. The I(247.7|g) measured in 1.17-min {+234}Pa |b-decay may possibly include contribution from another source. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI Deduced from I|g(310.52|g)/I|g(1193.77|g)= 0.039 {I4}/6.02 {I24} in {+234}Np |e decay. I|g(311|g)=0.61 {I12} was measured by 1975Ar23. The I(311.0|g) measured in 1.17-min {+234}Pa |b-decay may possibly include contribution from another source. 
E E|g=310.52 {I10} from {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E 387.94 {I6} was measured in {+234}Np |e decay. 
RI Deduced from I|g(387.6|g)/I|g(1193.77|g)= 0.208 {I12}/6.02 {I24} in {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI 1.42 {I15} listed by 1975Ar23 is assumed by the evaluators to be in error: the ratio of I|g(625|g)/I|g(1434|g)=0.0119 {I12} from I|g's measured in {+234}Np |e decay does not agree with the ratio that one obtains in 1.17-min {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay, if I|g(625|g)=1.42 {I5}. The ratio observed in {+234}Np |e decay is adopted, since data of 1967Wa09 confirm it. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
RI 1.06 {I22} was measured for this doubly-placed |g. The total I|g is divided by the evaluators such that the I|g(649|g)/I|g(1434|g) ratio from the 1435-keV level and the I|g(649|g)/I|g(691|g) ratio from the 1500-keV level agree with those in {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 1975Ar23 
I|g=3.89 {I10} measured by 1990Sc09 and 1.56 {I15} measured by 1975Ar23 do not agree. I|g of 1990Sc09 may include some counts from the 1393.9|g of {+234}Pa g.s. decay. However, the 1434|g deexciting the same level should not have any interference from the {+234}Pa g.s. decay. The ratio, I|g(1392|g)/I|g(1434|g)=0.356 {I20} from I|g's measured in {+234}Np |e decay; this ratio is 0.402 {I12} and 0.190 {I28} from I|g's of 1990Sc09 and 1975Ar23, respectively. The ratio of 0.356 {I20} is used by the evaluators to obtain I|g(1392|g) given here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI Deduced by the evaluators from I|g(750.7|g)/I|g(1558|g)=44.0 {I26}/1872 {I20} in {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI Deduced by the evaluators from the ratios of I|g(791.9|g)/I|g(1558|g)=25.4 {I15}/1872 {I20} in {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
The intensity imbalance at the 1457-keV level (I|b=-0.0014 {I6}) improves if the 338.1|g decaying to that level is E1 with |a=0.0304. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
If the 338.1|g, decaying to (2-) state is E1, then the 362.8|g decaying to the 1- state is also E1, with |a=0.0262. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E measurement of 1959Ga13. E|g=43.498 {I1} was measured in {+238}Pu |a decay. 
RI deduced by the evaluators from intensity balance at the 43-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E measurement of 1959Ga13. E|g=99.853 {I3} is adopted from measurements in {+238}Pu |a decay. 
RI deduced by the evaluators from intensity balance at the 143-keV level. 
M from "Adopted Gammas". 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E measurement of 1967Ha04. 
Ice(K)=1.34 for the 809.8-keV E0 transition from the measured intensity of Ice(K 809 doublet)=1.67 (1967Wa09) and Ice(K 809.8|g)/Ice(K 808.13|g)=4 {I1} (1959Ga13). The ratio of K/LMN=3.5, as measured for 809.8 E0 transition in {+238}Pu decay, is used to deduce the total ce intensity of |?1.7% 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
CC Ice(K 808.13|g)=0.33 from Ice(K 809 doublet)=1.67 (1967Wa09) and Ice(K 809.8)/Ice(K 808.13)=4 {I1} (1959Ga13). The ratio of K/LMN=3.5, as measured for 809.8 E0 transition in {+238}Pu decay, is used to deduce the total ce intensity. [|a(K)(E2; 808.13|g)=0.0123; therefore, the measured ce intensity is essentially due to the E0 part of the transition]. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
A peak reported in 1983Ar13 at 782.32 {I15} keV with I|g=0.027 {I13} is assumed by the evaluators to be due mostly to an impurity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
IG=0.066 7 was measured by 1983Ar13 for the twice-placed 192.91G. The intensities of 192.91 G's deexciting the 1044- and 1237-KEV levels have been deduced by the evaluators such that sum of these two photon intensities is 0.066 and that RI(193G of 1044 level)/RI(1001G) from (0-) 234PA decay= RI(193G of 1044 level)/RI(1001G) from 234NP EC decay; and RI(193G of 1237 level)/RI(1194G) from (0-) 234PA decay= RI(193G of 1237 level)/RI(1194G) from 234NP decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E from 1959Ga13. 
Total Ice=0.165% {I19} was calculated by the evaluator from [total Ice(234.6|g)]/Ice(K 1001.05|g)=[87+9]/837 {I10}, as measured in 1.17-min {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. Extremely weak K- and L1 lines were observed by 1959Ga13. The 234.6-keV transition was also seen by 1967Ha04 and placed twice on the level scheme. The intensity of 0.2% shown on their decay scheme is consistent with the intensity deduced here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E from 1959Ga13. 
TI$I(|g+ce)|?0.1%. Very weak K and L1 lines were observed by 1959Ga13. 1967Ha04 observed in their electron spectrum the 234-keV transition, corresponding to 233.6- and 234.6-keV transitions of 1959Ga13. Total ce intensities of 0.1% and 0.2% for these two transitions, respectively, were shown on the decay scheme of 1967Ha04; the method of dividing the observed intensity for 234-keV transition was not explained. Intensity balance at the 1085.4-keV level yields I(|g+ce)=0.04 {I+7-4}, if there is no direct |e decay to the level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI intensity is derived from the measured intensity of 0.066 7. See the comment for RI(192.91G leaving 1044 level). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other measured energies are 43.477 {I5} (1976GuZN), 43.491 {I9} (1972Sc01), 43.492 {I10} (1971GuZY). 
RI from measured values of I|g=396 {I10} (1984Bo41), 382 {I8} (1984He19), 385 {I5} (1976GuZN), 411 {I8} (1976Um01). 
M |a=734 {I15} from adopted I|g and I|a. Measured Ice's: L1/L2=0.0345 {I19}; L1/L3=0.0399 {I22}; L2/L3=1.147 {I20} (1969Am02); M1:M2:M3:M45=4.2:104:100:2.0 (1969Am02); |a=780 {I55} by |a|g coincidence (1968Du06); |a=790 {I65} by |a|g coincidence (1968Sc21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other measured energies are 99.864 {I5} (1976GuZN), 99.85 {I1} (1972Sc01), 99.84 {I4} (1969LeZX). 
RI from measured intensities of I|g=74.3 {I8} (1984He19), 73.0 {I11} (1984Bo41) and 72.4 {I14} (1976GuZN). 
M L2/L3|?1.0 by (|a)(ce) (1959Tr37); |a=13.3 {I7} from I|a and I|g. See also {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other measured energies are 152.68 {I2} (1976GuZN), 152.719 {I19} (1972Sc01), 152.71 {I5} (1969LeZX). 
RI$Weighted average of 9.36 {I10} (1984He19), 9.28 {I14} (1984Bo41), 9.56 {I20} (1976GuZN), and 9.230 {I68} (1994Ba91). 
M from experimental |a deduced from Ice/I|g [I(ce 99|g)/I(ce 152|g)=40 (1959Tr37)] and also from intensity balance at the 296-keV level. See also {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 6.75-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. Energies measured in {+238}Pu |a decay are 201.017 {I30} (1972Sc01), 200.98 (1976GuZN), 200.9 {I2} (1969LeZX). 
RI from measured intensities of 0.036 {I8} (1969LeZX), 0.0399 {I9} (1976GuZN). I|g=0.0374 {I10} is listed in 1979Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.0562 {I10} (1969LeZX), 0.0507 {I8} (1976GuZN), 0.0504 {I27}(1984Ov01). I|g=0.0522 {I9} is listed in 1979Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.0352 {I8} (1969LeZY), 0.0321 {I5} (1976GuZN), 0.0306 {I12} (1984Ov01). I|g=0.0316 {I10} is listed in 1979Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
Ice(K)=6|*10{+-5}%; K/LMN=3.5, |a(K)exp>60 (1963Le17, 1964Le22). I(|g+ce)=7.7|*10{+-5}%. 
E 809.8 was measured in {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI there is a disagreement for the intensity of 705.6|g deexciting the 849.1-keV level: I|g(705.9|g)=0.00102 {I15} (1969LeZX), 0.00049 {I20} (1976GuZN), 0.00056 {I23} (1984Ov01). Average of the more recent and consistent values has been adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
RI measured intensities of I|g=0.00136 {I15} (1969LeZX), 0.00126 {I19} (1976GuZN), 0.0016 {I5} (1984Ov01) might possibly include I|g of 804.1|g deexciting the 947-keV level. The ratio of I|g(705.9|g)/I|g(805.6|g)=0.90 {I7}, adopted from the 6.75-h and 1.159-min {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay, and from the {+234}Np |e decay, yields I|g(805.6|g)=0.00059 {I23}. I|g(804.1|g)+I|g(805.6|g)=0.0012 {I5}+0.0006 {I3}=0.0018 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(708|g)/I|g(808|g)=0.51 {I8}, as measured in {+234}Np |e decay. The intensities measured in {+238}Pu |a decay are I|g=0.00279 {I22} (1969LeZX), 0.0049 {I5} (1976GuZN), 0.0038 {I7} (1984Ov01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
RI from 0.00824 {I20} (1969LeZX), 0.00784 {I24} (1976GuZN), 0.0089 {I9} (1984Ov01). 
CC deduced in {+234}Np |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.0083 {I4} (1969LeZX), 0.0071 {I14} (1984Ov01). I|g=0.00775 {I55} is listed in 1979Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.0061 {I3} (1969LeZX), 0.0054 {I7} (1984Ov01). I|g=0.00565 {I29} is listed in 1979Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(804|g)/I|g(904|g)=1.8 {I7}, measured in 6.75-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 
CC deduced in 6.70-h {+234}Pa |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=0.0106 {I4} (1969LeZX), 0.0091 {I12} (1984Ov01). I|g=0.0101 {I4} is listed in 1979Ce04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E from 1961Re02 (s ce). 
(Ice(L1)+Ice(L2))/Ice(L3)=1.30 {I15}, [Ice(M)+Ice(N)]/Ice(L)=0.33 {I4} (1961Re02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$in ENSDF database this |g is placed also from a 1537 level which is not confirmed here. In table III of 2013Ko37, initial level should be 1496.1 not 1554.5 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$L1/L1=0.0739 {I57}; L1/L3=0.0935 {I58}; L2/L3=1.27 {I3}; M2/M3=1.37 {I7}, M3/L1L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.0871 {I35}, Ntotal/L1L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.0458 {I18} (2016Di11). The measured ratios for L2/L3 are in good agreement with 1969Am02: Nucl.Phys. A126, 201 (1969) and BrICC but the L1 emission has been overestimated by |? a factor of 2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 0.0768 keV {I5} (1979Zh05) and 0.07616 keV {I53} (1996PaZY). Others: 1995Pa45. 
B(E3)(W.u.)=1.57|*10{+19}/(1+|a) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI$absolute intensity measurement (1994Mo36,1992Bl07). 
CC$deduced by evaluator from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 13.0-keV level and I|g=0.0341% {I9} (1992Bl07,1994Mo36). 
M,MR$deduced by evaluator from |a(exp)=538.6, using |a(exp)(Theory, M1)=513.7 and |a(exp)(Theory, E2)=76830 from 1978Ro22. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=SY
decay_comment:
RI comparison with (n,|g) suggests that most of the intensity de-excites the 81.8 level. I|g=485 {I6} for doublet (1994Mo36). Other value: I|g=410 {I5} (1976GuZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
Other value: E|g=46.69 keV, I|g=58 {I4} (1976GuZN). 
M$for pure M1 I|g<100 from |g-ray transition intensity balance. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=30.2 {I18} for the doublet (1994Mo36). Intensity split based on (n,|g). Other value: I|g=32 {I2} (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
The I|g has been split based on the (n,|g) decay scheme. The measured intensity of the doublet is 3.47 with 0.4% uncertainty. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E0
decay_comment:
E and |a are from (n,|g). I|g(769.37)=11.9 {I2} is from {+239}Pu |a decay(1986LoZT) and |g-ray branchings in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$|g-ray branching is larger than in {+239}Pu |a decay, which suggests that this |g ray is a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E|g=832.3 keV {I1}, I|g=0.19 {I4} (1972Ri08) (In better agreement with values from {+239}Pu |a decay.) 
RI I|g=0.017 from {+239}Pu |a decay suggests that this |g ray is a doublet in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
$L2/L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.407 {I10}; L3/L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.333 {I9}; M2/L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.115 {I6}, M3/L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.0873 {I51}, Ntotal/L2L3M2M3Ntotal=0.0544 {I32} (2016Di11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+236}Np |e decay (22.5 h) and {+240}Pu |a decay. 
E$weighted average of 45.29 {I6} (1956Ho54); 45.3 {I2} (1959Tr37); 45.273 {I20} (1971Cl03,1972ClZS); 45.242 {I6} (1972Sc01); 45.232 {I5} (1971GuZY,1976GuZN); 45.244 {I2} (1981He16) and 45.23 {I3} (1983Ah02); others: 44.2 {I1} (1956Gr11); 45.62 {I1} (1958Sa21); 45.32 (1959Ga13) and 45.28 (1968Du06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+236}Np |e decay (155|*10{+3} y) 
E$weighted average of 104.244 {I5} (1971GuZY,1976GuZN), 104.233 {I5} (1972Sc01), 104.234 {I6} (1981He16,1986He12); others: 103.95 {I50} (1958Sa21), 103.6 {I3} (1959Tr37), 104.15 {I2} (1971Cl03,1972ClZS) and 104.23 {I2} (1983Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
M$from {+236}Np |e decay (155|*10{+3} y) 
E$weighted average of 160.280 {I15} (1971GuZY,1976GuZN), 160.310 {I8} (1972Sc01), 160.312 {I10} (1975OtZX), 160.308 {I3} (1981He16,1986He12), others: 160.0 {I15} (1959Tr37), 160.27 {I2} (1971Cl03,1972ClZS) and 160.33 {I2} (1983Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.11 {I5} 
M$from |a(L1+L2)exp=0.086 {I27} (1969Le05) and |a(K)exp=0.11 {I5} (1983Fa15). 
E$weighted average of 538.25 {I20} (1969Le05), 538.09 {I15} (1975OtZX), 537.92 {I20} (1977Po05) and 538.1 {I1} (1984Mi02). 
CC$from the summation of |a(L1+L2)exp in 1969Le05 and |a(K)exp in 1983Fa15 with additional 10% uncertainty for higher shells; |a(K)exp=0.11 {I5} (1983Fa15). 
RI$weighted average of 1.11 {I12} (1969Le05) 1.1 {I1} (1975OtZX), 1.6 {I6} (1977Po05) and 1.6 {I3} (1984Mi02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2+E3)
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.111 {I10} |a(L)exp=0.031 {I9} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.112 {I10}, |a(K)/|a(L)=3.59 {I11}, |a(L1)/|a(L2)=11 {I4}, |a(L1+L2)/|a(L3)=36 {I+10-7} (1969Le05); |a(K)exp=0.11 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.031 {I9}, |a(K)/|a(L)=3.56 {I50} (1977Po05); |a(K)exp=0.11 {I1}, |a(L1)exp=0.032 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.0034 {I4}, |a(L3)exp=0.0016 {I11}, |a(M1)exp=0.0058 {I7}, Anomalous conversion due to penetration effect. The M2 and E3 admixtures are smalls (1983Fa15). 
E$weighted average of 642.42 {I10} (1969Le05), 642.06 {I17} (1969BaZW), 642.48 {I15} (1971Cl03,1972ClZS), 641.8 {I1} (1972MaYR), 642.2 {I1} (1973Gr20), 642.3 {I3} (1973Or06), 642.33 {I10} (1975OtZX), 642.24 {I10} (1977Po05) and 642.3 {I1} (1984Mi02). 
CC$from the summation all subshell |as in 1983Fa15 with additional 5% uncertainty for higher shells; |a(K)exp=0.111 {I10} from weighted average of 0.112 {I10} (1969Le05), 0.11 {I3} (1977Po05) and 0.11 {I1} (1983Fa15); |a(L)exp=0.031 {I9} (1977Po05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.219 {I14} |a(L)exp=0.069 {I9} 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2}, |a(K)/|a(L)=3.26 {I16}, |a(L1)/|a(L2)=7 {I3}, |a(L1+L2)/|a(L3)=46 {I+40-20} (1969Le05); |a(K)exp=0.219 {I14}, |a(L)exp=0.069 {I9}, |a(K)/|a(L)=3.19 {I38} (1977Po05); |a(L1)exp=0.059 {I3}, |a(L2)exp=0.0129 {I15}, |a(L3)exp=0.0016 {I11}, |a(M1)exp=0.0195 {I23}, Anomalous conversion due to penetration effects. The M2 and E3 admixtures are small (1983Fa15). 
E$Weighted average of 687.71 {I10} (1969Le05), 687.39 {I17} (1969BaZW), 688.01 {I15} (1971Cl03,1972ClZS), 687.5 {I10} (1972MaYR), 687.5 {I1} (1973Gr20), 687.6 {I3} (1973Or06), 687.57 {I16} (1975OtZX), 687.52 {I10} (1977Po05) and 687.5 {I1} (1984Mi02). 
CC$from the summation all subshell |as in 1983Fa15 with additional 5% uncertainty for higher shells; |a(K)exp=0.219 {I14} from weighted average of 0.22 {I2} (1969Le05) and 0.219 {I14} (1977Po05); |a(L)exp=0.069 {I9} (1977Po05). 
RI$weighted average of 26.5 {I5} (1969Le05), 28.5 {I5} (1971GuZY,1976GuZN), 24.8 {I36} (1973Or06), 21 {I3} (1973Gr20), 26.2 {I7} (1975OtZX), 29.4 {I9} (1977Po05), 26.8 {I20} (1984Mi02) and 29 {I4} (1979McZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$from {+236}U(d,pn|g), uncertainty deduced from level energy difference, 
RI$deduced from |g-ray intensity balance in {+236}Pa |b{+-} decay; other: I|g|>5 from {+236}U(d,pn|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. Not observed in {+236}Pa |b{+-} decay. 
RI$deduced by the evaluator by assuming negligible |b{+-} decay to the 744-keV level (J|p=1- to J|p=3-) and using |a(E2)=199 for this |g ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance with 8% {I3} {+236}Np decay feeding to this level (1969Le05). 
E$measured: 45.28 {I6} (1956Ho54) and 44.2 {I1} (1956Gr11). 
M$from |a(L2)/|a(L3)|?1 (1956Gr11). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance with no 22.5-h {+236}Np |e decay feeding to this level (1969Le05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.04315 {I9} (1981He16,1986He12), 0.0453 {I9} (1971GuZY,1976GuZN) and 0.0461 {I9} (1976Um01). 
M$from |a(L2)/|a(L3)=1.05 {I5}, |a(M2)/|a(M3)=1.40 {I5} and |a(L)/|a(M)=2.6 {I2} (1958Sa21) and |a(tot)exp=607 {29} (1968Du06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average of 0.000422 {I21} (1975OtZX), 0.000402 {I8} (1971GuZY,1976GuZY), 0.000402 {I4} (1981He16,1986He12) and 0.0004065 {I17} (1994Ba91); other: 0.00104 {I14} (1972ClZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
CC,EKC$taken from the Adopted Gammas 
RI$deduced using I|g(538)/I|g(642)=0.0114 {I8} from Adopted Gammas; measured: 1.47|*10{+-7} {I12} (1975OtZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2+E3)
decay_comment:
CC,EKC,ELC$from Adopted Gammas. 
RI$weighted average of 1.4|*10{+-5} {I2} (1969Le05), 1.26|*10{+-5} {I3} (1975OtZX) and 1.245|*10{+-5} {I12} (1976GuZN); other: 4.1|*10{+-5} (1972ClZS). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
CC,EKC,ELC$from Adopted Gammas. 
RI$deduced using I|g(688)/I|g(642)=0.274 {I5} from Adopted Gammas; measured: 3.8|*10{+-6} {I10} (1969Le05), 8.1|*10{+-6} (1972ClZS), 3.30|*10{+-6} {I13} (1975OtZX) and 3.55|*10{+-6} {I5} (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|aM(exp)=7 {I3}, |aN+L+...(exp)=2 {I1} (1979McZP). 
$Delayed I|g(104|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.11 {I3} (1979McZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2+E3)
decay_comment:
M,CC$from Adopted Gammas; others: K/L=3.8 {I3} (1969BaZW); K/L=3.9 {I13} (1979McZP). 
E$others: 642.06 keV {I17} (1969BaZW), 642.2 keV {I1} (1973Gr20), and 641.8 keV {I1} (1972MaYR). 
RI$from 1972MaYR; others: 65 {I10} {I4} (1969We06) and 58 (1975OtZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M,CC$from Adopted Gammas; others: K/L=3.6 {I4} (1969BaZW); |aK(exp)=0.16 {I6}, |aL(exp)=0.07 {I4}, K/L=2.3 {I10} (1979McZP). 
E$others: 687.39 {I17} (1969BaZW), 687.5 {I1} (1973Gr20), and 687.5 {I10} (1972MaYR). 
RI$weighted average of 19 {I5} (1972MaYR) and 18 {I4} (1969We06). others: 18 (1975OtZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$from 1969BaZW; other: 912.7 (1975OtZX). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.08 {I3} deduced using ce(K)/ce(K)(642|g)=0.042 {I13} (1969BaZW), |a(K)exp(642|g)=0.111 {I10}, I|g(642|g)=58 {I2} and I|g(912|g)=3.2. 
RI$from 1975OtZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 915.10 {I25} (1969BaZW) and 914.6 {I2} (1973Gr20), other: 915.4 (1970Ka22). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.19 {I1} deduced using ce(K)/ce(K)(642|g)=0.117 {I12} (1969BaZW), |a(K)exp(642|g)=0.111 {I10}, I|g(642|g)=58 {I2} and I|g(915|g)=4.0 and ce(L)/ce(K)(642|g)<2.3 (1969BaZW). 
RI$from 1975OtZX. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$from 1972MaYR, others: 921.9 (1970Ka22), 922.1 (1975OtZX) and 921.3 {I10} (1979McZP). 
RI$from 1972MaYR, other: 5.4 (1975OtZX). 
M$suggested inconclusively as E1 based on no ce data observed (1979McZP). 
$Delayed I|g(921|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.08 {I3} (1979McZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 966.9 {I4} (1973Gr20), 966.7 {I3} (1972MaYR) and 965.8 {I10} (1979McZP); other: 967.2 (1975OtZX). 
RI$from 1972MaYR, other: 6.6 (1975OtZX). 
M$suggested inconclusively as E1 based on no ce data observed (1979McZP). 
$Delayed I|g(966|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.15 {I3} (1979McZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1979McZP, other: 243.8 (1975OtZX). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.49 {I21} and |a(L)exp=0.26 {I12} (1979McZP). 
RI$from delayed I|g(243|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.18 {I3} and I|g(942|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.44 {I6} (1979McZP) using I|g(942|g)=14 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1979McZP, other: 301.0 (1975OtZX). 
RI$from delayed I|g(300|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.10 {I2} and I|g(942|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.44 {I6} (1979McZP) using I|g(942|g)=14 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$from 1972MaYR; others: 941 (1969We06), 942.6 {I10} (1979McZP), 943.0 (1975OtZX) and 943.0 (1970Ka22). 
RI$weighted average of 11 {I4} (1969We06) and 15 {I2} (1972MaYR); others: 9.4 (1975OtZX). 
M$suggested inconclusively as E1 based on no ce data observed (1979McZP). 
$Delayed I|g(943|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.44 {I6} (1979McZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 956.5{I2} (1972MaYR) and 955.9 {I3} (1973Gr20); others: 955 (1969We06), 956.2 (1970Ka22) and 956.6 (1975OtZX). 
RI$weighted average of 17.5 {I45} (1969We06) and 15 {I2} (1972MaYR); other: 10.3 (1975OtZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0+E2)
decay_comment:
M$no |g observed with strong ce(K)|?50 using ce(K)/ce(K)(642|g)=0.094 {I10} (1969BaZW), |a(K)exp(642|g)=0.111 {I10} and I|g(642|g)=58 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from 1972MaYR; others: 1005.9 (1970Ka22) and 1006.2 (1975OtZX). 
RI$from 1972MaYR; other: 4.4 (1975OtZX). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from 1979McZP. 
M$from |a(M)exp=0.10 {I5} (1979McZP). 
RI$from delayed I|g(308|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.41 {I6} and I|g(903|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.17 {I3} (1979McZP) using I|g(903|g)=2.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1979McZP; others: 308.1 (1975OtZX). 
M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.33 {I17} (1979McZP). 
RI$from delayed I|g(308|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.37 {I6} and I|g(903|g)/I|g(642|g)=0.17 {I3} (1979McZP) using I|g(903|g)=2.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 903.2 {I10} (1979McZP) and 903.7 {I4} (1973Gr20); others: 903.4 (1975OtZX), 903.5 (1970Ka22). 
RI$from 1975OtZX. 
M$suggested inconclusively as E1 based on no ce data observed (1979McZP). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 909.1 {I2} (1969BaZW), 909.0 {I2} (1973Gr20), and 910.2 {I3} (1972MaYR), other: 909 (1969We06), 909.7 (1970Ka22) and 910.0 (1975OtZX) 
RI$weighted average of 11.5 {I40} (1969We06) and 11 {I1} (1972MaYR); other: 7.6 (1975OtZX). 
M$from |a(K)exp=0.029 {I6} deduced using ce(K)/ce(K)(642|g)=0.050 {I8} (1969BaZW), |a(K)exp(642|g)=0.111 {I10}, I|g(642|g)=58 {I2} and I|g(909|g)=11 {I1}, ce(K)=5.0 {I8} (1969BaZW) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4648.3 {I6} (1972MaYR, 1975WeZA), and 4646.8 {I3} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 7.0 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4883.9 {I10} (1972MaYR, 1975WeZA), and 4885.7 {I4} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 4.0 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 4973.0 {I5} (1972MaYR,1975WeZA), and 4974.2 {I4} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 3.0 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5196.8 {I25} (1972MaYR,1975WeZA), and 5197.2 {I4} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 2.0 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5213.7 {I10} (1972MaYR,1975WeZA) and 5212.4 {I7} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 1.0 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5323.2 {I18} (1972MaYR), 5323.2 {I18} (1975WeZA) and 5323.8 {I5} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 0.8 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5493.4 {I10} (1972MaYR), 5494.8 {I25} (1975WeZA) and 5494 {I2} (1970Ka22). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5544.1 {I7} (1975WeZA), 5546 {I2} (1973Gr20), 5544.6 {I13} (1972MaYR), 5544 {I2} (1970Ka22) and 5544.6 keV 7 (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 0.7 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 5584.1 {I7} (1975WeZA), 5588 keV 2 (1973Gr20), 5585 {I2} (1970Ka22), and 5585.5 {I9} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 0.3 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6395 {I2} (1970Ka22), 6395.7 {I4} (1975WeZA), 6396 {I2} (1973Gr20), 6395.5 {I3} (1972MaYR), and 6395.4 {I3} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 4 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 6500.0 {I7} (1975WeZA), and 6498.9 {I8} (1970JuZZ). 
RI$from 1972MaYR and 1975WeZA, other: 0.2 (1970JuZZ). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Alternative placement: from a possible 1170 level following 1580-keV transition (1989Sc30). 
M$from |g|g angular correlation (1989Sc30). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_comment:
M$based on evidence of K/L=4.7 {I14}, limited population probability and FWHM associated with the upper limit on the half-lives of the observed transitions (1982Go02). 
E$from conversion electrons (1982Go02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2+E3)
decay_comment:
RI$deduced from Adopted decay branch ratios and I(|g+ce) balance with I|e=0.1% (1981Li30). 
CC,EKC,ELC$from Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
CC,EKC,ELC$from the Adopted Gammas. 
RI$deduced from Adopted branching ratios with I|e=0.1% (1981Li30). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level scheme; transition has not been observed. I(|g+ce)(26.6|g)/I|g(71.6)=37 was deduced by the evaluator from {+241}Pu |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E Placement of 121.2|g from 2004Fo01. In {+241}Pu |a decay the placement is shown from the 7/2+ state at 204.15 keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI branching is from {+237}Pa |b{+-} decay. Other possible multiplet (placed from the 947.97 level which is not populated in {+237}Pa |b{+-} decay) is suggested only in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI branching from {+237}Pa |b{+-} decay. Other possible multiplet (placed from the 947.97 level which is not populated in {+237}Pa |b{+-} decay) is suggested only in (n,|g). See {+237}Pa |b{+-} decay for a comment on branching measured in |b{+-} decay and in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI I(|g+ce)=8.7 {I11} obtained from intensity balance at the 56.2-keV level and |a=166 {I65} deduced in {+242}Pu |a decay yield I|g=0.052 {I22}. The 45.0-keV peak in |g spectrum of 1974Ka05 included a {+236}Pa |g. The {+237}Pa and {+236}Pa contributions could not be determined (1974Ka05). 
E|g=44.86 {I10} is adopted from {+241}Pu |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
I|g(865|g)/I|g(853|g)=0.23 {I12} was measured in (n,|g), a factor of 2 smaller than the value given here. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
The intensity balance at the 56.28-keV level yields |d=0.50 {I14}. An |d=0.62 was obtained by evaluator from calculation using the Alaga rule on 44.86|g and 56.32|g. Alaga rule yields I|g(44.86|g; E2 part)/I|g(56.32|g)=0.0916, from which E2/M1(44.86|g)=0.27 (|d=0.62) is obtained. The 45.724|g in {+237}Pu which connects the 5/2+ and 3/2+ states of the 1/2[631] band, the mixing ratio was determined to be |d=0.47 {I13}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI transition not observed. Highly converted M1+E2 transition with total transition intensity of 3.9% {I14} of |a decay is expected from intensity balance at the 82.89-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI Weighted average of 0.90 {I3} (1976GuZN), 0.861 {I22} (1985He02), 0.829 {I18} (1985Wi04). I|g=0.207|*10{+-6} {I4}/{+237}U decay which corresponds to 0.845 {I18} per 100 |a decays is recommended in 1986LoZT from I|g's of 1985He02 and 1985Wi04. 
CC E2 admixture is calculated to be small, E2/M1=0.00159, using Alaga rule on 77.1|g and 159.9|g and their corresponding I|g. E2/M1 value yields |d=0.04 and |a=10.7. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI Weighted average of: 4.12 {I2} (1976GuZN), 4.16 {I12} (1985He02), and 4.21 {I5} (1985Wi04). 1986LoZT recommend I|g=1.02|*10{+-6} {I2} per {+237}U decay which is equal to 4.16 {I9} per 100 |a decays. Other values: 4.5 {I5} (1968Ah01), 4.24 {I20} (1978DiZU). 
M E2/M1=0.00479 is obtained from I|g(103.68|g; E2 part)/I|g(159.955|g)=0.0735, calculated by the evaluator using the Alaga rule, I|g(103|g)=4.15 {I5}, and I|g(159|g)=0.267 {I6}. 
CC for pure M1, |a=4.45. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI Weighted average of 7.63 {I12} (1976GuZN), 7.60 {I7} (1985He02), 7.57 {I7} (1985Wi04). I|g=1.859|*10{+-6} {I16} per {+237}U decay, corresponding to 7.59 {I9} per 100 |a decays, is recommended in 1986LoZT. Other values: 7.56 {I28} (1978DiZU), 9.0 {I9} (1968Ah01). 
M E2/M1=0.0281 {I8} (|d=0.170) is obtained from I|g(148|g; E2 part)/I|g(159|g)=0.790, calculated by the evaluator using the Alaga rule, I|g(148|g)=7.59, and I|g(159|g)=0.270. 
CC for pure M1, |a=7.64. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI I|g=0.0658|*10{+-6} {I9} per {+237}U decay, corresponding to 0.269 {I5} per 100 |a decays, is recommended in 1986LoZT. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M,MR from total conversion coefficient of |a=75.2 {I28}. 
CC obtained from intensity balance at the 204.15-keV level. For the 40.748-keV 7/2+ to 5/2+, 5/2[622] intraband transition in {+237}Pu, |d=0.194 {I30} was deduced in {+237}Am |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
CC from intensity balance at the 261.0-keV level. 
MR from the total conversion coefficient of |a=28 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level scheme. Transition was not observed; it would be obscured by the K x-rays. 
RI Estimated using Alaga rule on (101|g) and 56.76|g by the evaluator, using I|g(56.76|g)=0.040 {I4} and |d(56.76|g)=0.11 {I+8-11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E,RI From |g|g coincidence in 1968Ah01. 
M from intensity balance at the 274.0-keV level: |a(E2)=7.42, |a(M1)=3.38. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W;ERR=CONV
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.191 {I30} 
CC$from |a(K)exp and |a/|a(K)=1.19 (E0 theory) 
MR$|d(E2/M1)=+4.1 {I+6-5} from Coulomb excitation (1994Mc03) 
$|r{+2}=0.0099 {I18} from Coulomb excitation (2001Ga55) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI$from Coulomb excitation. E=448.4 {I9} is reported in (n,n'|g), but the transition is multiply placed with most of the intensity being placed from the 1129 {I2}- level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1+E0
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.653 {I33} 
MR$|d(E2/M1)=+3.50 {I+20-25} from Coulomb excitation (1994Mc03) 
$|r{+2}=0.175 {I26} from Coulomb excitation (2001Ga55) 
CC$from |a(K)exp and |a/|a(K)=1.19 (E0 theory) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1179.2 {I4} from Coulomb excitation, and 1179.4 {I2} from 1984BlZS, 1179.6 {I3} from 1978De41, and 1179.0 {I2} from 1972Mc19 in (n,n'|g) 
MR$|d=+7.0 {I+14-10} or -0.295 from |g(|q) in Coulomb excitation 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1968Tr07 assign I|g=14 and I|g=6 to peaks at 849.3 and 851.9, respectively. Only a single peak is shown in 1970HeZX 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
L and M conversion lines were observed following the photofission reaction on {+238}U. They were identified by 1976Be55 as belonging to the 44.9|g from decay of the 44.9 level following IT decay of the shape isomer. They showed a half-life of 300 ns. Half-life = 202 ps, calculated value (2008Pa04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E from 1975Ru03, also confirmed by 1992St05 
RI weighted average from 1975Ru03 and 1992St05 is 43 |mb {I11} 
%|g=32 {i7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
%|g=65 {i7} 
E from 1984Ka10, also confirmed by 1992St05 
RI$weighted average from 1975Ru03 and 1992St05 is 88 |mb {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
%e=0.22 {i6} 
E from 1983Ka11. Energy of the E0 K-conversion electrons is 2442.4 {I20}. No photons were observed. 
TI 1983Ka11 report |s(ce(K))=0.230 |mb {I50}. The authors add 16% to account for the higher shell conversion electrons, and 15% to account for internal pair production. The total ce intensity is thus 0.30 |mb {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$from |a(K)exp and |a/|a(K)=1.19 (E0 theory) 
$|r{+2}=0.0099 {I18} (2001Ga55) 
MR$|d(E2/M1)=+4.1 {I+6-5} or -0.185 from |g(|q) (1994Mc03). 
M$from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$from (n,n'|g). E=659 in Coulomb excitation, but no uncertainties are available for transitions from the 7- level. Uncertainties are available for transitions from both lower and higher band members 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from E(ce(K) to g.s.)-E(ce(K) 992.31|g from 1037 level)=4.92 {I23} (2001Ga58). 1996Ho18 report 996.7 {I6} 
M$seen in ce spectrum but not in photon spectrum (private communication from the lead author of 2001Ga55) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
EKC$private communication from the lead author of 2001Ga55 
RI$I|g(953|g)/I|g(849|g)=0.71 {I7} (1981Al02). Note that the B(E1) ratio given by the author is a misprint. The ratio should be inverted 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
CC$from |a(K)exp and |a/|a(K)=1.19 (E0 theory) 
MR$|d(E2/M1)=+3.50 {I+20-25} from |g(|q) (1994Mc03) 
$|r{+2}=0.175 {I26} (2001Ga55), 0.176 {I34} (1994Mc03) 
RI$I|g/I|g(1037|g)=0.70 {I8} (1981Al02). This is the authors value from their B(E2) ratios as corrected for the M1 component of the 992|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp and |g(|q) 
MR$|d=+10.0 {I+15-14} or -0.34 from |g(|q) (1994Mc03). |a(K)exp rules out the small solution 
E 2001Ga55 also report 1015.2 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
M |g(|q) for the 1084 and 397 |g's from the 1129 {I2}- level are consistent with the 1-3 correlation if the unobserved 41.4 transition is pure quadrupole 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$reported only by 1967Di07 the evaluator has increased the author's value by 2 keV. This adjustment is based on a comparison of other values of these authors compared with those of 1994Mc03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L2)exp=1.6 {I4}; ce(L1):ce(L2):ce(L3):ce(M1):ce(M2):ce(M3) :ce(N2):ce(N3):ce(O)= 2.6 {I2}:30.0 {I3}:18.5 {I2}:0.9 {I1} :5.7 {I3}:5.1 {I1}:2.0 {I2}:1.4 {I1}:0.60 {I14} (1978Bo12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.015 {I5} (1978Bo12). 
M$from av res (n,|g) the 1066.8 level is 1/2- or 3/2- in contradiction to the mult assignment of 1978Bo12 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.42 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.20 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.20 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.17 {I1} 
Multipolarity: (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.41 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.19 {I6} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.31 {I12} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.10 {I4} 
Multipolarity: (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.58 {I7} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.07 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.31 {I4} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.04 {I1} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.41 {I6} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.08 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.28 {I4} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.23 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.67 {I6} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.07 {I1} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.24 {I3} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.02 {I1} 
Multipolarity: (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.56 {I4} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.08 {I1} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.26 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.10 {I1} 
Multipolarity: (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.67 {I6} 
$E(n)(eV)=708.3=0.15 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.17 {I2} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.01 {I1} 
Multipolarity: (E1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
$E(n)(eV)=721.6=0.52 {I12} 
$E(n)(eV)=730.1=0.47 {I11} 
$E(n)(eV)=765.1=0.01 {I1} 
Multipolarity: (E2) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Transition not seen. E(|g) is derived in {+244}Pu({+18}O,{+20}Ne|g) from the moment of inertia deduced from the higher levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$deduced using Rosel's |a= 462 {I20} 
E$Transition not seen. The energy is derived by the authors from the moment of inertia deduced from the higher levels 
TI$From an intensity balance at the 47.8 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI 1.74 {I27} photons per 100 K| x ray (in coin measurement), 2.67 {I7} (in singles measurement) (1971Go01). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)|?17% comparing I(|g+ce)(38.5|g)/I(|g+ce)(370.9|g)=40 \/15.3=2.6, from {+237}U |b{+-} decay, to I(|g+ce)(370.|g)=7.5 in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E 59.5412 {I2} from {+241}Am |a decay. 
CC obtained from measured Ice's and I|g's. See also {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$calculated by the evaluator from I|g(69.76|g)/I|g(43.423|g)=2.9 {I4}/73 {I8}, as measured in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI$calculated by the evaluator from I|g(102.98|g)/I|g(43.423|g)=19.5 {I1}/73 {I8}, as measured in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI 1.865 {I23} (from 457 {I4} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays; 1985He02), 1.853 {I23} (from 454 {I4} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays; 1985Wi04). I|g=1.84 {I5} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI 21.2 {I3} (from 5200 {I50} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays; 1985He02, 1985Wi04). I|g=21.7 {I5} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 
|a(K)exp=2.30 {I12} determined in 1966Ya05 by comparing ce and |g intensities of 208|g with those of 411.8|g from {+198}Au taking |a(K)=0.0302 {I5} for the 411.8|g. 
MR positive sign for |d is from |g|g(|q) measurements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
RI from 0.714 {I22} (1.75 {I5} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays, 1985He02) and 0.711 {I10} (1.741 {I15} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays, 1985Wi04). I|g=0.740 {I18} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
RI from 314 {I3} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays (1985Wi04). 1.28 {I2} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=294 {I3} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays (1985Wi04). I|g=1.21 {I3} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E 292.77 {I6} from {+241}Am |a decay. 
RI from I|g(292.7|g)/I|g(208.0|g)=0.00012 {I3}, as measured in 1966Ya05. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=23.3 {I5} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays (1985Wi04). I|g=0.097 {I3} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LT
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=9.6 {I4} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays (1985Wi04). I|g=0.043 {I2} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays (1976GuZN). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from level scheme; transition has not been observed. 
RI if there is no |b{+-} feeding to the 368.59-keV level, the intensity balance at that level suggests that I(|g+ce)(2.3|g)=0.235 {I11}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g=26.3 {I4} per 1000 {+241}Pu decays (1985Wi04). I|g=0.110 {I4} per 100 {+237}U |b{+-} decays in 1976GuZN. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated from I|g(75.8|g)/I|g(42.73|g)=3/28, as measured in the Coulomb excitation of {+237}Np. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I|g(69.76|g)/I|g(43.42|g)=73 {I8}/2.9 {I4}, as measured in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I|g(102.98|g)/I|g(43.42|g)=19.5 {I1}/73 {I8}, as measured in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I|g(98.97|g)/I|g(55.56|g)=203 {I3}/181 {I18}, as measured in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I|g(125.3|g)/I|g(55.56|g)=40.8 3/181 {I18}, as measured in {+241}Am |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
E Other energies: 33.1925 {I25} (1998Ko61), 33.199 {I21} (1955Da02), 33.21 {I2} (1964Wo03), 33.20 {I2} (1966Ko06), 33.197 (1976GuZN), 33.205 {I20} (1978Ge17); E|g=33.195 {I11} from {+237}U |b{+-} decay. 
RI other intensities(%): 0.14 (1955Da02), 0.11 (1957Ma17), 0.104 {I11} (1971Ge11), 0.106 {I11} (1978Ge06), 0.125 {I8} (1983Ah02), 0.12 {I1} (1984Ov02), 0.1233 {I28} (1992Bl07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E From compilation in 2000He14. 26.3448 {I2} in 1993He18. Other energies: 26.363 {I14} (1955Da02), 26.356 {I20} (1964Wo03), 26.35 {I5} (1966Ko06), 26.345 {I1} (1970Ne11), 26.344 (1976GuZN), 26.346 {I6} (1978Ge06) 
RI lwm average of 2.06% {I3} (2005Iw01), 2.41% {I5} (1983De11) and 2.395% {I19} (1992Bl07). Other I|g's (%): 2.5 {I2} (1957Ma17), 2.23 {I18} (1971Ge11), 2.4 {I1} (1974Ca16), 2.45 {I5} (1976GuZN), 2.54 {I26} (1978Ge06). Other absolute/relative measurements: 1952Be24, 1955Ja01, 1955Da02, 1971Wa28, 1984Ov02, 1988Co07. 1991BaZS recommend I|g=2.4% {I1} from weighted average of measured values prior to 1991. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E From compilation in 2000He14. 59.5412 {I1} in 1993He18. Other energies: 59.568 {I17} (1955Da02), 59.59 (1959Sa10), 59.57 {I2} (1966Ko06), 59.537 {I1} (1968Je01), 59.536 {I3} (1976GuZN). 
RI Weighted average of (%): 38.87 {I17} (2005Iw01), 35.3 {I6} (|a|g)(1969Pe17), 35.9 {I4} (1971GuZY), 36.3 {I4} (4|p |a|g)(1975Le09), 35.5 {I3} (4|p |a|g)(1976Pl05), 35.82 {I12} (1983Hu04), 36.36 {I17} (1987De22), 36.03 {I25} (1992Bl07), 35.6 {I2} (1992Ma16). Other values: 40.0 {I15} (1952Be24), 35.9 (1957Ma17), 34.6 {I7} (4|p |a|g)(1965Mc12). See also 1955Ja01, 1965Mi06. I|g=36.0% {I4} was recommended in 1991BaZS from weighted average of I|g's of 1975Le09, 1976Pl05, 1983Hu04 and 1987De22. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
E From 1998Ko61. 42.73 {I5} (1978Ge06,1978Ge17), 42.81 (1959Sa10); 42.57 {I30} from {+237}Np Coulomb excitation. 
RI measured in 1978Ge06; not listed in 1976GuZN. 
|d=0.13 is expected from |d(33.2|g)=0.13, if the strong coupling collective model (see 1953Bo25) is assumed valid for the intraband transitions. The author of 1959Sa10 lists L3/L1|?4 and proposes M3 multipolarity. This ratio gives |d|?0.86 for M1+E2 multipolarity. However, |d=0.86 yields |a=401 and |a(L)=294, and these are not consistent with the intensity balance at the 75.92 level and nonobservation of its L-conversion lines in {+237}Pu |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E from 1966Ko06, 1959Sa10. 
RI calculated by the evaluator from I|g(75.8|g)/I|g(42.7|g)=3/28, as measured in Coulomb excitation, and I|g(42.7|g)=550. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E From 1998Ko61. 43.423 {I10} (1978Ge06,1978Ge17). 
RI From 1978Ge06; this transition was not listed in 1976GuZN, but I|g=91|*10{+2} {I19} was given in their earlier work (1971GuZY). Other intensities (1|*10{+2}): 90 (1955Da02), 73 {I7} (1957Ma17), 57 {I18} (1971Ge11), 66 {I5} (1984Ov02), 65.4 {I29} (1992Bl07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI from 1978Ge06; this |g was not listed in 1976GuZN, but I|g=201 {I13} was given in their earlier work (1971GuZY). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI other intensities (1|*10{+3}): 1.9 {I3} (1966Le13), 1.5 {I5} (1966Mi05), 2.1 {I3} (1967Gu08), 2.52 {I18} (1978Ge06), 2.1 {I2} (1984Ov02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
The ratio of I(|g+ce)(54.0|g)/I(|g+ce)(96.7|g)=89/11, deduced in (p,2n|g) reaction, yields I(|g+ce)(54.0|g)=757, if I(|g+ce)(96.7|g)=94 {I32}. 
I|g|?21 from Alaga rule and I|g(95|g)=4.7, if |d(54.1|g)|?0.13 (the interband transition 33.2|g has |d=0.13 {I3}). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E from Coulomb excitation and {+238}U(p,2n|g) reaction. This transition was seen only in 1966Ko06 ({+241}Am |a decay) of energy 95.0 {I2}. E|g=96.8 from level scheme. 
I|g=4.7 {I16} from Ice(L2)=37 {I12} (1966Ko06) and |a(L2)=7.90 (E2 theory). I(|g+ce)=94 {I32} from I|g=4.7 {I16} and |a(E2)=18.9. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E other energies: 99.00 {I4} (1964Wo03), 98.97 {I3} (1966Ko06), 98.951 {I5} (1976GuZN). 
RI other intensities (1|*10{+3}): 2.4 {I3} (1966Le13), 1.9 {I6} (1966Mi05), 2.0 {I3} (1967Gu08), 2.9 {I2} (1978Ge06), 1.9 {I2} (1984Ov02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI other intensities: 56 {I16} (1966Le13), 64 {I13} (1966Mi05), 75 {I4} (1967Gu08), 77 {I4} (1984Ov02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2
decay_comment:
E from 1976GuZN; not seen in 1978Ge17. E|g=234.40 {I4} was measured in {+237}U |b{+-} decay. 
M from {+237}U |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E other values: 248.0 {I4} (1968Ka09), 249.05 (1979Ar11); E|g=248.50 {I7} from level scheme. 
RI from 1978Ge17; not listed in 1976GuZN. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I(51|g)/I(332|g) =98 {I44}/555 {I22}, as measured in {+237}U |b{+-} decay, and I(332|g)=14.9 {I3}. 
M from {+237}U |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI calculated by the evaluator from I(64.8|g)/I(332|g)=5.4 {I6}/5.55 {I22}, as measured in {+237}U |b{+-} decay, and I(332|g)=14.9 {I3}. 
M from {+237}U |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
RI from 1978Ge17; not listed in 1976GuZN. |g was observed in coincidence spectrum and I|g=0.8 was given in 1968Ka09. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from 1978Ge17; not given in 1976GuZN, but I|g=0.15 was listed in 1971GuZY. 
M E1 or E2 from decay scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E0+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
CC |a(K)exp=0.18 {I4}, K/(L+M+..)=4 {I1} from (|a)(ce) and (|a)(|g) coincidence measurements of 1966Le13. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI from 1978Ge17; not listed in 1976GuZN. Measured intensities of 1978Ge17 and 1971Cl03 disagree: I|g=0.54 was given in 1971Cl03. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI there is a discrepancy of measured intensities in 1976GuZN and 1978Ge17: I|g=0.129 from 1978Ge17. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$L1/L123M12=0.284 {I12}; L2/L123M12=0.436 {I13}; L3/L123M12=0.114 {I4}; M12/L123M12=0.0287 {I47} (2016Di11). The measured ratios for L1, L2, L3 correlate well with the measurements of 1966Ya05: Nucl.Phys. 84, 505 (1966) but deviate from BrICC 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$L1/L3=1.83 {I6}, L2/L3=3.61 {I8}, L1,2/L3=5.44 {I7}; M1/M3=2.14 {I21}, M2/M3=3.77 {I35}, M4/M3=0.10 {I5}, M5/M3=0.15 {I6}, M1,2/M3=5.91 {I45}, M4,5/M3=0.25 {I7}, N1,2/N3=4.12 {I32}, N4-7/N3=0.25 {I18}, O/N=0.25 {I5}, N+/M=0.35 {I5}; M/L=0.263 {I4}, L/Tot=73.8 {I21}, M+/Tot=26.2 {I21} 
$Relative I(ce(L)) to |SL=100: L1=28.4 {I7}, L2=56.0 {I7}, L3=15.5 {I2}, L1,2=84.46 {I21} 
$Relative I(ce(M+)) to |S(M+O+P+...)=100: M1=22.1 {I7}, M2=39.1 {I8}, M3=10.4 {I8}, M4=1.0 {I5}, M5=1.6 {I4}, N1=5.1 {I4}, N2=10.4 {I4}, N3=3.7 {I4}, N4-7=0.9 {I7}, M=74.1 {I5}, N=20.2 {I5}, O=5.0 {I7}, P+=0.7 {I6}, M1,2=61.2 {I4}, M4,5=2.6 {I5}, N+=25.9 {I5}, O+=5.7 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E,RI$seen only in |a decay and placed by the authors from the 313 level. The placement is perhaps questionable since I|g/I|g(176|g)=3.0 {I16} in |a decay, and this ratio for (n,|g) would give I|g(151|g)=0.5 {I3} per 100 neutron captures, an intensity large enough for the |g line to have been seen 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1990Ho02 assign mult=E2 in (n,|g), and the placement requires |DJ=2, |D|p=no; however, the ce ratios suggest an M1 component. One gets |d=1.44 {I8}, 0.27 {I3}, and 0.93 {I7} from L1/L2, L3/L2, and M1/M2, respectively. M3/M2 gives |d>0.25 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From L1:L2:L3=100:17 {I1}:2.5 {I1}; M1/L1=0.25 {I2}; M1:M2:M3=100:14 {I1}:3.7 {I4} ; |a(L1)exp=11.8 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From L1:L2:L3=100:16 {I4}:1.9 {I5}; M1/L1=0.28 {I7}; M1:M2:M3=100:22 {I5}:2.5 {I6}; |a(L1)exp=6.2 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From L1:L2:L3=100:21 {I1}:9.0 {I5}; M1/L1=0.31 {I2}; M1:M2:M3=100:23.6 {I12}:8 {I1} 
M$authors' entry of I(|a(M1))=236 {I12} relative to I(|a(M1))=100 in table ii is a misprint. The evaluators assume this should be 23.6 {I12} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$the experimental L3/L2 value of 0.61 {I3} is slightly smaller than the E2 theory value of 0.72, suggesting E2+M1 with |d=0.49 {I+10-7}; however, the placement of this transition requires |DL=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$L3/L2(E2 theory)=0.60, slightly inconsistent with the experimental value of 0.53 {I4}. The placement requires |DL=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$1990Ho02 assign mult=E1+M2 with |d=0.022; however, the evaluators' reanalysis indicates that no M2 admixture is required 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From L1:L2:L3=100:20 {I1}:11 {I1}; M1/L1=0.35 {I2}; M1:M2:M3=100:64 {I16}:13 {I2} 
MR$M2/M1 yields an inconsistent value of 0.26 {I5} and is not used in arriving at the adopted value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From L2/L1=0.17 {I1}; M1/L1=0.20 {I1}; M1:M2:M3=100:17 {I1}:18 {I1} 
MR$M3/M1 yields an inconsistent value of 0.167 {I5} and is not used in arriving at the adopted value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
MR$From L2/L1=0.18 {I2}; M1/L1=0.20 {I1}; M2/M1=1.17 {I7} 
E$unplaced by authors. Added by evaluators on the basis of E(level)=218.7 {I6} for the 6+ member of the band whose 5+ member is at 165.59 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.10 {I3} 
M$|a(K)exp is consistent with mult=E1 or E2. Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from L-subshell ratios. The M-subshell values give inconsistent results. M1/M2 yields |d=0.60, M3/M2 yields |d=0.056, and M1/L1 requires an E4 component 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$the experimental L3/L2 value of 0.61 {I7} is slightly smaller than the E2 theory value of 0.73, suggesting E2+M1 with |d=0.45 {I+27-11}; however, the placement of this transition requires |DL=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
M$1990Ho02 show mult=M1+E2 in table I; however, I|g was deduced from I(ce(L1)) using the |a(L1) value for mult=M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1990Ho02 assign mult=M1+E2; however, the conversion data are not consistent. |a(K)exp gives |d=1.7 {I3}, L2/L1 gives |d=0.18 {I4}, L3/L1 gives |d=0.42 {I4}, and L1/K is not consistent with any multipolarity. Placement in the decay scheme involves |DJ=1, |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$From L1:L2:L3=100:37 {I4}:7 {I2}; M1/L1=0.28 {I4}; M2/M1=0.71 {I15} 
MR$weighted average of 0.23 {I2}, 0.13 {I2}, and 0.33 {I5} from L2/L1, L3/L1, and M2/M1, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M,MR$|d=0.09 {I+3-4} from M2/M1. |a(L1)exp gives |d<0.46, L2/L1 gives |d<0.16, and M3/M1 gives an anomalously high value of 0.210 {I15} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$the authors assign mult=E2 and place the transition from a 3- to a 1- level; however, the data are not consistent with pure E2. All the ce ratios except M3/M2 require an M1 admixture; however, the deduced |d values are not self consistent. One gets |d>0.25 from M3/M2, and 1.44 {I8}, 0.27 {I3}, and 0.93 {I7} from L1/L2, L3/L2, and M1/M2, respectively 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.07 {I1}s 
M$the authors assign mult=E1,E2, but |a(K)exp is consistent only with E2, unless one invokes an M2 admixture with |d=0.114 {I17} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.1 {I2} 
$Transition is unplaced by 1990Ho02. Placement is suggested by the evaluators as deexcitation of the 473.3 level reported by these authors in their arc work 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$1990Ho02 show mult=E2 for this transition; however, no ce data are available. The basis for this assignment is not given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(exp)=274 {I11}; Average of |a(exp)=284 {I45}, deduced by evaluator from a |g-ray transition intensity balance in {+239}U |b{+-} decay, and |a(exp)=273 {I11}, also deduced by evaluator from |g-ray transition intensity balance in {+243}Am |a decay. 
RI$from 0.064% {I7} (1996Sa23); Other: 0.068% {I10} (1986LoZT). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$From 2003Br12, 1971Ar47, 1969Cl12. 
RI$from 49.2% {I12} (1996Sa23); others: 48.1% {I10} (1986LoZT); I|g=48% {I2} if I|g(277.6|g)=14.1% {I4} in {+239}Np |b{+-} decay (1976GlZY). I|g=59.3% (1969Cl12) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E From 2003Br12, 1971Ar47, 1969Cl12. 
RI$from 0.053% {I6} (1996Sa23); Other: 0.052% {I6} (1986LoZT). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E From 2003Br12, 1971Ar47, 1969Cl12. 
RI$from 0.14% {I3} (1996Sa23); Other: 0.13% {I4} (1986LoZT). 
E$from {+243}Am |a decay scheme this E|g should be 117.84 keV {I2}. Possibly x-rays interfered with the measurement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M M1+<30% E2 was deduced by 1972Sc44 from L| x ray spectra in coincidence with 43.5|g (contribution from other gammas subtracted by use of (74.6|g)(L| x ray) coincidence spectra). Intensity balance at 31.10-keV level requires that |a=189 {I15} corresponding to |d=0.09 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of I|g=6.04% {I13} (1984Va41), I|g=4.0% {I10} (1960As02), I|g=5.3% {I5} (1968Va09), I|g=5.0% {I10} (1969Al14), I|g=5.5% {I3} (1972Ah02), I|g=5.3% {I12} (1979Po20), I|g=6.2% {I3} (1982Ah04), I|g=5.93% {I10} (1996Wo05), I|g=5.72% {I17} (1996Sa23) renormalized to I|g(74.7|g)=100. 
M from intensity balance. Also from ce data in {+239}U decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=67.2% {I12}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of I|g=68.5% {I15} (1984Va41), I|g=69% {I3} (1960As02), I|g=61% {I6} (1968Va09), I|g=66% {I3} (1972Ah02), I|g=59% {I4} (1977St35), I|g=60% {I4} (1979Po20), I|g=68% {I2} (1982Ah04), I|g=66.7% {I12} (1996Wo05), I|g=68.4% {I13} (1996Sa23). 
M |a(L)exp=0.170 from (|a)(ce)/|a|g, L12/L3=2.2 (1969En02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
RI deduced by the evaluator from |a(M)exp=31, Ice(M)(43.1|g)/I|g(117.6|g)=3.56 as measured by 1969En02, and I|g(117.6|g)=0.84 (from intensity balance I|g=0.11) 
M |a(M)exp=31 from (|a)(ce)/|a|g (1969En02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of I|g=0.350% {I10} (1984Va41), I|g=0.37% {I4} (1968Va09), I|g=0.340% {I15} (1982Ah04), I|g=0.342% {I15} (1996Wo05), I|g=0.344% {I9} (1996Sa23) renormalized to I|g(74.7|g)=100. 
M |a(M)exp|<0.034 from (|a)(ce)/|a|g (1969En02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
RI calculated by evaluator from (Ice(L)(98.5|g)/(Ice(L)(142|g)=21.4 (1969En02), I|g(142|g), and |a(L)(98.5|g)=11.5, |a(L)(142.18|g)=0.0394 (theory). 
M |a(L)exp|>2.2, L12/L3=1.81 by (|a)(ce) coincidences; photon was not observed (1969En02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of I|g=0.130% {I10} (1984Va41), I|g=0.130% {I10} (1968Va09), I|g=0.128% {I6} (1982Ah04), I|g=0.117% {I5} (1996Wo05), I|g=0.107% {I3} (1996Sa23) renormalized to I|g(74.7|g)=100. 
M |a(L)exp=0.055 from (|a)(ce)/|a|g (1969En02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
EKC$from intensity ratio between the 183.7 |g-rays and Pu K{-|a} x- contribution of x rays from electron capture was subtracted in this analysis by 2004As12. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$from Adopted Gammas. Not measured in 2005As01 due to high internal conversion, and overlaping with the 103.7-keV Pu K{-|a1} x ray. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E weighted average of 145.536 {I9} ({+241}Cm |a decay) and 145.552 {I12} ({+237}Am |e decay). The unweighted average is 145.544 {I8}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
I|g=0.053 {I17} from Ice(L)=3.1 {I6} and |a(L)=59 {I14}. 
Ice: (L1+L2)/L3/M=2.5 {I5}/0.60 {I15}/0.8 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_comment:
Ice: (L1+L2)/L3/M/N=11.9 {I8}/5.0 {I4}/6.1 {I6}/2.2 {I2}; and L2/L3=10.6 {I5}/4.8 {I6}. 
E=145.536 {I9} in {+241}Cm |a decay; 145.544 {I10} is adopted. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
I|g=0.20 {I3} from Ice(L12) and |a(L1)+|a(L2)=8.96, I|g=0.28 {I7} from Ice(M) and |a(M)=2.193. 
Ice: L12/M=1.8 {I2}/0.61 {I15}; L1/L12=1.6 {I3}/1.8 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
Ice: L1/L2/L3=1.5 {I2}/0.6 {I2}/0.41 {I6}. The ce contributions from each |g of the doublet could not be deduced. The second possible 40.748|g between the 696.2- and 655.3-keV levels is assumed by the evaluator to be much weaker. The intensity balance at the 655.3-keV level suggests that I(|g+ce)(40.748|g deexciting 696.2 level)<1.50 {I15}; the sum of the (N-forbidden) |e branches to the 696.2- and 655.3-keV levels is 2.03% {I17} (independent of any 40.748|g between them). The measured ce intensities are assigned here to the 40.748|g deexciting the 320.97-keV level. It may be considered as an upper limit. 
I|g=0.028 {I5} from Ice(L3) and |a(L3)=14.4 {I5}. 
I(|g+ce)=1.33Ice(L)+I|g 
1983Bh10 calculated penetration parameters for the 40.748-keV photon from measured L-subshell conversion ratios. Possible effects on these ratios from conversion lines of the second 40.78|g deexciting the 696.2-keV level were not considered. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=0.42 {I5} was measured for this |g placed twice. I|g(252|g deexciting 407 level)= 0.42 {I5} - I|g(252|g deexciting 453 level). 
MR contributions of ce's from 252|g deexciting 453 level have been subtracted in calculations of mixing ratio. 
Ice: K/L=0.6 {I1}/0.12 {I3} for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
Since no coincidence data were taken between conversion electrons and |g's, this placement which is based on expectation of an intraband transition, and from energy fit may be considered questionable (the authors of 1975Ah05 did not show this second placement in their decay scheme). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_comment:
E From 1974Po08 (s ce); E|g=145.552 {I12} in {+237}Am |e decay. 
M |a(K)exp|<3, |a(L)exp=39 {I8} was determined from relative x-ray and 145|g intensities, assuming that all delayed x-rays were from conversion of the 145|g (1957St67). See also {+237}Am |e decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
RI$from |e decay. Values of |?0.64 from |b{+-} decay and 0.67 from |a decay depend on splitting the intensity of the doubly placed 713|g on the basis of model-dependent arguments 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
TI from {+238}Am |e decay, I(|g+ce)/I|g(897|g)=0.62 from 1960As10 in |a decay. The value of 1.4 {I2} in |b{+-} decay appears to be discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(M)exp=175 {I20} (1981Le15) 
TI$from |SI(|g+ce)[(|g+ce) to g.s. excluding the 44.08|g]=76.4 {I7}, the normalization factor 0.2519 {I21}, and the requirement of 100% feeding of the g.s. by |g+ce, one gets I(|g+ce)(44|g)=320.6 {I10} and I|b(to 44 level)=41.0% {I5}. From |a, one then gets I|g=0.413 {I5}, including a 1% uncertainty assigned to the theoretical |a value. 1990Ch35 report I|g=0.35 {I4}, and 1981Le15, based on ce data, report 0.32 {I4} 
RI From I(ce) and theoretical |a value. 
CC$value given is the E2 theory value lowered by 3% (see 1987Ra01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from {+242}Cm |a decay (1981Le15) 
RI from the intensity of the 897|g and the branching ratio I(336|g)/I(897|g)=0.031 {I15} in {+242}Cm |a decay. (1981Le15) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I8} (1981Le15) 
MR$1990Si11 report |d=-0.02 {I+11-3}. |d <0.05 from |a(K)exp in |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=3.5 {I4}, K/L=5.2 {I2} (1981Le15); K:L12:M12=72:21:7.5 (1960Al29) 
RI$Other from I|g/I|g(837|g)=0.94 {I22} in |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=0.0096 {I3}; K/L=4.4 {I2}; (L1+L2)/L3=19 {I2}; L/M=3.4 {I2} (1981Le15) |a(K)exp=0.0100 from absolute Ice measurements of 1962Bo03, and absolute I(|g)=23.8 {I6} measurements of 1967Sc34 
MR From 1990Si11 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E,RI$from 1972Wi22 
M$from an intensity balance at the 968 level, |a|<16; therefore, mult could be E1, M1 or E2. An intensity balance at the 1083 level gives |a=11 {I6} which rules out E1 and pure M1. The proposed level structure requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|a(L12)exp=296 {I30}; L12:L3:M:N=68 {I7}; 57 {I6}; 43 {I5}; 14.6 {I15} 
CC$value given is the E2 theory value lowered by 3% (see 1987Ra01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$from L3/L12=0.62 {I9}; 
RI$photon obscured by K x rays. Value is from (Ice(L)=2.6 {I3} and |a(L). From an intensity balance at the 146 level one deduces I|g=0.137 {I13}, suggesting additional feeding to the 146 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition was not observed in |e decay. I|g is deduced from I|g(837|g)/I|g(939|g)=1.06 {I25} in |a decay and E|g is a rounded-off value from |b{+-} decay and |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E0+E2
decay_comment:
RI$no photons were observed in |e decay. I|g is deduced from Ice(K)=0.42 {I4} and (Ice(L)=0.082 {I8} (with M+/L taken as 0.3) and |a=4.4 {I4} from |b{+-} decay 
M$from |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition was not observed in |e decay. I|g is deduced from I|g/I|g(939|g)=2.8 {I8} in |a decay and E|g is from |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
CC$|d gives |a=0.27 {I+7-4} 
M$|a(L12)exp|?0.15 and M/L12|?0.37 agree with mult=M1; however, |a(K)exp in |b{+-} decay gives mult=M1+E2 with |d=2.8 {I8}. If mult were M1, the ce(K) line would have had an intensity of 0.18, a value large enough to have been seen. Note that the ce(K) line of the 301.5|g, with Ice(K)=0.16 is reported. The evaluators adopt the assignment from |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E,RI$transition not observed. I|g is from I|g/I|g(941|g)=0.0199 {I10} in |b{+-} decay and E|g is a rounded-off value from |b{+-} decay 
M$from Ice(L12)|?0.035 and deduced I|g, one gets |a(L12)exp|?0.22 compared with theory values of 0.034 for E2 and 0.10 for M1. The placement requires |DJ=1 and |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$not observed in |e decay. E is a rounded-off value from |b{+-} decay, and I|g is from I|g/I|g(984|g+1028|g)=0.01866 {I19} in |b{+-} decay 
M$from |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
CC$the value given is the E2 theory value lowered by 3% (see 1987Ra01) 
RI$an unweighted average of the directly measure I|g values gives I|g=0.033 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$a weighted average of the directly measured values is 0.0033 {I8}. An unweighted average is 0.0055 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
E$from |e decay 
TI$from I(|g+ce)/I|g(897|g)=0.59 {I8} in |e decay. 1960As10 report 0.62 in |a decay. The value of 1.4 {I2} in |b{+-} decay appears to be discrepant 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g/I|g(919|g+963|g)=0.0424 {I11} in |b{+-} decay. Note that there is an unplaced 358.0 {I5} transition with I|g=5.9|*10{+-7} {I25}, part of which probably corresponds to the 358|g from the 962 level 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$not seen in |a decay. E is from |b{+-} decay, and I|g is from I|g/I|g(984|g+1028|g)=0.01866 {I19} in |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$the values are discrepant. The evaluators adopt an unweighted average of 521.2 {I5} from 1993De12 and 522.7 {I2} from Stoyer 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^4
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE2;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE2W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
RI$from {+239}Np |b{+-}. From B(E2) ratios in muonic atom and |d=0.50 I|g(49.4|g)=66, if I|g were exactly 85 then |d=0.59 rather than 0.50 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR from {+239}Am |e 
RI$weighted average of 0.11% {I1} (1982Ah04) and 0.18% {I3} (1974HeYW). I|g; =0.11 from ce(L) of 1959Ew90 and |a(L)=95. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(57|g, 57 level)/I|g(49|g)|?0.3 in {+243}Cm |a decay and I|g(49|g)=0.12% {I2} in {+239}Np |b{+-} Decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 3.42% {I3}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 3.43% {I7} (1996Wo05), 3.46% {I5} (1984Va41), 3.30% {I10} (1982Ah04), 3.36% {I14} (1977St35,1991Po17), and 3.42% {I10} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$After subtracting I|g=0.51% for the 227.83-keV |g-ray component that deexcites the 391.5-keV level, and I|g=0.259% {I16} for the 226.38-keV |g-ray component from the 511-keV level. 
RI$Other value: 11.14% {I11}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 10.91% {I16} (1996Wo05), 11.21% {I18} (1984Va41), 11.20% {I30} (1982Ah04), 11.78% {I44} (1977St35,1991Po17), 11.40% {I3} (1972Ah02), after subtracting I|g=0.51% for the 227.83-keV |g-ray component that deexcites the 391.5-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 14.44% {I10}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 14.53% {I17} (1996Wo05), 14.38% {I21} (1984Va41), 14.5% {I4} (1982Ah04), 14.30% {I24} (1979Mo25), 15.0% {I5} (1977St35,1991Po17),14.1% {I4} (1974Yu04), and 14.5% {I4} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 0.79% {I1}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 0.797% {I10} (1996Wo05), 0.77% {I2} (1984Va41), 0.790% {I25} (1982Ah04), 0.93% {I6} (1977St35,1991Po17), and 0.76% {I2} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 0.109% {I2}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 0.1078% {I27} (1996Wo05), 0.12% {I1} (1984Va41), 0.110% {I6} (1982Ah04), and 0.11% {I1} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 0.077% {I2}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 0.0762% {I24} (1996Wo05), 0.08% {I1} (1984Va41), 0.077% {I4} (1982Ah04), and 0.08% {I1} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI from transition intensity balance at 387-keV level, where no significant |b{+-} feeding is expected (5/2+ to 9/2+). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 1.40% {I7} (1996Wo05), 1.29% {I2} (1984Va41), and 1.29% {I6} (1982Ah04). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
CC L1/L2=0.87 {i9}/0.93 {i9} 1959Ew90, conversion is anomalous. Other: 1957Ew30, 2008Go10. 
RI$Other value: 26.3% {I10}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 25.23% {I28} (1996Wo05), 27.4% {I4} (1984Va41), 26.4% {I8} (1982Ah04), 26.6% {I10} (1977St35), and 27.8% {I9} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 1.60% {I2}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 1.604% {I20} (1996Wo05), 1.60% {I3} (1984Va41), 1.60% {I5} (1982Ah04), 1.63% {I7} (1977St35,1991Po17), and 1.52% {I5} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 2.06% {I2}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 2.050% {I25} (1996Wo05), 2.08% {I3} (1984Va41), 2.06% {I6} (1982Ah04), 2.10% {I10} (1977St35,1991Po17), and 1.95% {I7} (1972Ah02). 
E from 1974HeYW, 1959Ew90 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Other value: 0.0831% {I24}, weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 0.085% {I5} (1996Wo05), 0.07% {I1} (1984Va41), 0.083% {I4} (1982Ah04), and 0.075% {I8} (1972Ah02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$weighted average (Limited Relative Statistical Weight Method) of 0.230% {I14} (1996Wo05), 0.28% {I2} (1984Va41), and 0.24% {I3} (1977St35,1991Po17). 
E$from 1982Ah04 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g=0.170 {I17} after subtracting |?0.08 for 57.3|g deexciting the 387 level. I|g(57|g)|?0.09 disagrees with I|g(57|g, 57 level) in {+243}Cm |a decay and {+239}Np |b{+-} Decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(166.39|g)/I|g(254.4|g)=0.111 {I23}, using I(ce(L1))(166.39|g)/I(ce(K))(254.4|g)=7 {I1}/105 {I15} from {+239}Am |e decay (1959Ew90), the following theoretical conversion coefficients: |a(L1)(166.39|g; M1)=0.932, and |a(K)(254.4|g; M1+E2)=1.556, and I|g(254.4|g)=0.084 {I6}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
CC$for M1. 
RI from I|g(57|g, 387 level)/I|g(311|g)|?4.7 in {+243}Cm |a decay, and I|g(311|g)0.017 {I2}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI from I|g(106|g doublet)=0.05 {I1} after subtracting I|g(106|g, 163-keV level)=0.007 {I1}. 
CC anomalous E1 conversion (from {+239}Np |b{+-} of 1959Ew90) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_comment:
RI from {+239}Np |b{+-} decay, the value I|g=0.0170 {I15} in 1972Po04 is probably a typographical error. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
TI deduced by evaluator from |g-ray and |a-particle transition intensity balance at 7.86-keV level. I(|g+ce)(7.86|g)=I(|g+ce)(49|g) + I(|g+ce)(67|g) + I(|g+ce)(277|g) + I|a(6058|a)|?85% 
RI deduced by evaluator from I(|g+ce)(7.86|g)|?85% and |a=5700 {I400}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI |g ray placed twice in level scheme. I|g=0.14 {I1} was measured for the doublet. I|g from transition intensity balance at 57-keV level. I(|g+ce)(228|g) + I(|g+ce)(272|g) + I(|g+ce)(334|g) + I|a(6010) - I(|g+ce)(49|g)|?0.06%. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
ce lines were obscured by Auger lines in {+239}Am decay; an upper limit of 3% for its transition intensity was given by 1972Po04. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp=2.42 {I14}; |a(L12)exp=0.488 {I15} (1991Sh06). Other value: |d=-0.004 {I+1-24} from |g(|q) (1972Kr07,1990Si12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp=2.01 {I7}; |a(M)exp=0.0968 {I59} (1991Sh06). Other value: |d=+0.001 {I+9-1} from |g(|q) (1972Kr07,1990Si12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$from |a(K)exp=1.19 {I5}; |a(L12)exp=0.238 {I10}, |a(M)exp=0.0579 {I29} (1991Sh06). Other value: |d=+0.165 {I2}, from |g(|q) (1972Kr07,1990Si12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(44.66|g)/I|g(254.4|g)=0.13 {I1}/0.11 {I6}, as observed in {+239}Np |b{+-} decay (1982Ah04), and I|g(254.4|g)=0.11 {I1}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(166.39|g)/I|g(254.4|g)=0.111 {I23}, using I(ce(L1))(166.39|g)/I(ce(K))(254.4|g)=7 {I1}/105 {I15} from {+239}Am |e decay (1959Ew90), and the following theoretical conversion coefficients: |a(L1)(166.39|g; M1)=0.932, and |a(K)(254.4|g; M1+E2)=1.457 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+(E2)]
decay_comment:
RI$from I|g(doublet)=0.14% {I1} and I|g(57|g, 57-keV level)|?0.05%. 
E from E(level) difference. E=57.273 {I4} measured for the doublet 
CC for M1. Transition intensity balance at 387-keV level and theoretical |a(E2)=221 suggest a negligibly small E2 admixture. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
RI deduced from I|g(61.46|g)/I|g(334.31|g)=129 {I2}/207 {I3}, which was recommended by 1986LoZT, and from {+239}Np |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1(+M2)
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$LC=0.088 8$MC=0.0216 21$NC+=0.0074 8 NC=0.0058 6$OC=0.00139 15$PC=0.00023 3$QC=9.4E-6 15 
CC$experimental anomalous conversion coefficient (1959Ew90). Other: 1957Ew30 
RI deduced from I|g(106.12|g)/I|g(334.31|g)=27.2 {I4}/2.07 {I3}, as measured in {+239}Np |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$Cross section=4 eVb {I2} 
E$ placement is tentative since the energy difference is 8.6 keV {I3} as compared to an expected 7.86 keV. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ (841.1|g)(554.6|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.014 {I24}, (841.1|g)(597.4|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I24} (1970Sc12). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from ce spectrum (1957Sm77). Other: 42.9 {I1} (1972Ah07) 
TI$100-(summed intensity of |g rays to g.s. from levels above 42.9). Others: 92 from electron intensities of 1972Ah07 (uncertainties are not given by 1972Ah07 but expected to about 4% as in some other papers by the same group, e.g. 1974Po08); 112 {I14} (1971LeZO). 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. 1972Ah07 give measured intensity of 0.09 {I1} 
$Ice(L2)=33, Ice(L3)=30, Ice(M)=20.5, Ice(N+)=7.3 (1972Ah07) 
$(L1+L2)/L3=1.2 {I1}, L/M=3.7 {I3} (1971LeZO). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from |g spectrum (1972Ah07). Others: 98.9 {I2} (1957Sm77), 99.0 {I1} (1972Ah07) from ce spectrum 
TI$from intensity balance at 141.78 level and assuming |b feeding of 0.5% {I5}. Others: 27.1 from conversion electron intensity data of 1972Ah07 (uncertainties are not given by 1972Ah07 but expected to about 4% as in some other papers by the same group, e.g. 1974Po08); 30 {I3} (1971LeZO). 
RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. 1972Ah07 give measured intensity of 1.5 {I2} 
$Ice(L1+L2)=11.4, Ice(L3)=7.2, Ice(M)=5.4, Ice(N+)=1.97 (1972Ah07) 
$(L1+L2)/L3=1.67 {I15} (1971LeZO). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$ EG=305.3 10, RI(305.3G)/RI(987.8G)=0.0010 (1972PoZS), probably contributed by an impurity. G unplaced in 1972PoZS 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=916.1 2, RI=0.087 6 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=916.2 3, RI=0.10 1 (1972Ah07); unplaced |g in 1972Ah07 
$ EG=917.1 2, RI(917.1G)/RI(987.8G)=0.00096 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$ EG=343.7 10, RI(343.7G)/RI(987.8G)=0.0013 (1972PoZS), probably contributed by an impurity. Unplaced G in 1972PoZS 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=959.1 5, RI=0.037 4 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=959.4 3, RI=0.05 1 (1972Ah07); unplaced |g in 1972Ah07 
$ EG=960.2 2, RI(960.2G)/RI(987.8G)=0.00030 (1972PoZS) 
E$ placed by evaluators in consistency with results from 61.9-min {+240}Np decay. The placement from 959 level proposed by 1971LeZO and 1972PoZS is in disagreement 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ EG=382.3 10, RI(382.3G)/RI(987.8G)=0.00070 (1972PoZS). Unplaced G in 1972PoZS 
$ Placed by evaluators on the basis of energy fit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$%I|g (photon intensity/100 decays of the parent) deduced by evaluators using the same procedures as for the 988-keV |g ray. Calculations were performed with the code gabs (www.nndc.bnl.gov). If no |b feeding is assumed to the 42.9- and 141.8-keV levels, then %I|g(888.85|g)=25.1 {I4} 
M$from K/L3=44 {I5} (1972Ah07), 39 {I20} (1971LeZO) and |a(K)exp values from 1972Ah07 and 1971LeZO. Others: |d(E2/M1)>5 (1971LeZO), >4.5 (1972Ah07) 
$ EG=888.83 5, RI=25.1 4 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=888.7 1, RI=25.1 9 (1972Ah07); 888.8 2 (1972Ah07, ce data) 
$ EG=888.91 5, RI(888.91G)/RI(987.84G)=0.341 15 (1972PoZS) 
$Ice(K)=0.276, Ice(L3)=0.0063, Ice(M)=0.030, Ice(N+)=0.012 (1972Ah07) 
E$ weighted average of 1971LeZO, 1972Ah07 and 1972PoZS 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2(+M1)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
$This %I|g value is the average of 72.4 {I9} from procedure #1 and 72.0 {I6} from procedure #2 as described in the comment for normalization of the level scheme. If no |b feeding is assumed to the 42.9- and 141.8-keV levels, then %I|g(987.79|g)=73.1 {I4} Calculations were performed with the code gabs (www.nndc.bnl.gov). 
M$from (L1+L2)/L3=18.3 {I20} and K/L3=84 {I9} (1972Ah07). Others: |d(E2/M1)>6 (1971LeZO), >4.5 (1972Ah07) 
$ EG=987.79 6, RI=73.2 10 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=987.7 1, RI=73.3 25 (1972Ah07); 987.7 2 (1972Ah07, ce data) 
$ EG=987.84 6, intensities of other |g rays normalized to 100 for 987.84G (1972PoZS) 
$Ice(K)=0.74, Ice(L1+L2)=0.161, Ice(L3)=0.0088, Ice(M)=0.044, Ice(N+)=0.019 (1972Ah07) 
$K/L=3.77 {I11}; L1/L2=1.5 {I+10-5}; (L1+L2)/L3=20 {I2} (1971LeZO) 
E$ weighted average of 1971LeZO, 1972Ah07 and 1972PoZS 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1033.5 3, RI=0.010 1 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1033.4 5, RI=0.011 2 (1972Ah07); unplaced |g in 1972Ah07 
$ EG=1034 1, RI(1034G)/RI(987.84G)=0.00013 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1094.6 3, RI=0.016 1 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1095.0 5, RI=0.014 3 (1972Ah07); unplaced |g in 1972Ah07 
$ EG=1095.5 2, RI(1095.5G)/RI(987.84G)=0.00019 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1036.0 3, RI=0.015 2 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1036.3 4, RI=0.017 3 (1972Ah07) 
$ EG=1037 1, RI(1037G)/RI(987.84G)=0.00020 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1135.2 3, RI=0.050 5 (1972Ah07) 
$ EG=1135.0 3, RI=0.048 3 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1136.0 3, RI(1136.0G)/RI(987.8G)=0.00061 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1180.5 5, RI=0.011 3 (1972Ah07); unplaced |g in 1972Ah07 
$ EG=1180.2 3, RI=0.0101 8 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1180.9 2, RI(1180.9G)/RI(987.84G)=0.00012 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1120.3 4, RI=0.011 1 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1120.4 5, RI=0.011 3 (1972Ah07) 
$ EG=1121.8 2, RI(1121.8G)/RI(987.84G)=0.00015 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$ EG=1219.2 3, RI=0.035 2 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1219.5 4, RI=0.034 5 (1972Ah07) 
$ EG=1220.8 2, RI(1220.8G)/RI(987.8G)=0.00046 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$ EG=1294.0 3, RI=0.009 1 (1971LeZO) 
$ EG=1294.3 4, RI=0.012 3 (1972Ah07), unplaced |g in 1972Ah07 
$ EG=1295.4 2, RI(1295.4G)/RI(987.84G)=0.00013 (1972PoZS) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by the evaluators from %IA and |a(42.8|g); |g feeding to 42.8 level from higher level is only |?0.1% of the total transition intensity of 42.8|g 
M$from experimental conversion coefficients quoted above from 1990Pe03. Other: |a(exp)=845 {I93} (1968Du06). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$deduced by the evaluators from %IA, |a(98.8|g) and |g feeding to 141.7 level from higher level. Other: I|g(98.9|g)/I|g(42.8|g)=0.067 {I7} (1972Sc01) compares with 0.054 {I8} given here. 
$Experimental conversion coefficients given above are from 1990Pe03 
$ measured RI=0.301 2 relative to 1.0 for 42.8G (1990Pe03). This value is too high by a factor of |?5.5 from the adopted value 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$from average of measured 1240 {I120} (1969ScZZ) and 1237 {I136} deduced from %IA, |a(152.6|g) and |g feeding from higher levels. Other: measured I|g(152.6|g)/I|g(42.8|g)=0.044 {I1} (1990Pe03) and 0.041 {I1} (1972Sc01) are consistent with 0.040 {I4} from intensities given here. 1254 {I140} deduced from %IA, |a(152.6|g) and |g feeding from higher levels 
M$measured Ice(K) and Ice(L) (1990Pe03) are consistent with E2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$ EG=554, RI=NORMALIZED TO 100 IN 1978LeZA AND 1969ScZZ. 1969ScZZ NORMALIZED RI(597G)=100 WITH RI(554G)=161 10 
$ RI=0.003 1 relative to 1.0 for 42.8G (1990Pe03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$ EG=303, RI=21.1 16 (1969ScZZ); RI=23 4 (1978LeZA). 
$ RI=0.003 1 relative to 1.0 for 42.8G (1990Pe03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
RI$ 2.1 {I6} (1978LeZA) is too high by at least a factor of 20 with branching ratio in 'adopted gammas'. In 1969ScZZ, this |g was not seen, the authors quoted an upper limit of I|g<1.2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$%I(ce(K))=0.20 (2001Ga05) 
RI$intensity of this line is ten times larger than any other transition in the second minimum 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$%I(ce(K))=0.2 
E$ PLACEMENT FROM 1518.7+X LEVEL, NOT 1580.5+X LEVEL AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 6 OF 2001Th16 (CONFIRMED IN AUTHORS' E-MAIL REPLY OF DEC 3, 2003) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ PLACEMENT FROM 1580.5+X LEVEL, NOT 1654.7+X LEVEL AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 6 OF 2001Th16 (CONFIRMED IN AUTHORS' E-MAIL REPLY OF DEC 3, 2003) 
$%I(ce(K))=0.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: (E0)
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$ from e-mail reply from P.G. Thirolf (Nov 4, 2003); 672.0 in 2001Th16 is a misprint 
$%I(ce(K))=0.1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Not seen in (n,|g) spectrum. Values are from {+245}Cm |a decay, where I|g/I|g(190|g)=0.165 {I11} 
MR$From {+245}Cm |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$Taken from I|g/I|g(190|g)=0.555 {I16} in {+245}Cm |a decay. since the measured I|g of 0.029 {I5} from1998Wh01 is too large and apparently includes a contribution from a fission product |g -rays according to the authors 
E$From ce spectrum in 1998Wh01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$Only a slight indication for its existence was found in the |g spectrum. One expects E|g=404.453. This transition is not seen in (n,|g). If one assumes that I|g is smaller than that for the adjacent 404.707 and 405.90 |g's in (n,|g), one can estimate I|g<0.01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$Obscured by the K|a{-2}| x ray (1980Di13). The energy is from the the adopted level scheme and the intensity is from I|g(96|g)/I|g(54|g)=0.15 {I3} in adopted gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From 1998Wh01. 1994Sh31 report E|g=56.79 {I4} 
TI$From an intensity balance at the 232 level 
M,MR$From I(|g+ce) and I|g one deduces |a=92 {I8} which corresponds to mult=M1+E2 with |d=0.68 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=LE
decay_comment:
E$Reported only by 1980Di13, but adopted in the level scheme of 1994Sh31 
TI$From an intensity balance at the 301 level, with a 10% uncertainty assigned to the |a branch feeding this level 
M,MR$From I(|g+ce) and I|g one deduces |a=26 {I+33-11} which corresponds to mult=M1(+E2) with |d||<1.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 1998Wh01. 1994Sh31 report E|g=139.80 {I4} 
RI$Weighted average of values of 1994Sh31 and 1998Wh01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$From 1998Wh01. 1994Sh31 report E|g=205.58 {I7} 
RI$Weighted average of values of 1994Sh31 and 1998Wh01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$The authors' value for I(ce(L3)) in Table II is incorrect (priv comm from R. W. Hoff. The correct value is not available). |d is from L2/L1 and M2/M1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|d>2.4 from |a(L2)exp, >0.64 from L3/L2, and 5.5 {I+8-6} from L1/L2. Placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2, |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Uncertainty in authors' table I is 3 eV. The value should be 20 eV (priv comm from R. W. Hoff) 
M$the value for M3/M2 given in the authors' Table II is incorrect (priv comm from R. W. Hoff). The |d value is deduced from L2/L1 and L3/L1 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E,RI$Not seen in (n,|g) spectrum. Values are from {+245}Cm(|a) decay, where I|g/I|g(190|g)=0.165 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g is taken from I|g/I|g(190|g)=0.555 {I16} in {+245}Cm(|a) decay since the measured I|g of 0.029 {I5} from 1998Wh01 is too large and apparently includes a contribution from fission product |g-rays according to the authors. 
E$From ce spectrum in 1998Wh01 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$|d=1.8 {I+10-4} from |a(L2)exp, >0.77 from L3/L2, and >0.56 from M3/M2. Placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.020 {I3} compared with 0.013 (E1) and 0.034 (E2). Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} compared with 0.0134 (E1) and 0.0356 (E2). Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=no. See comment on J|p(561 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.040 {I21} compared with 0.0108 (E1) and 0.0288 (E2). See comment on J|p(561 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.038 {I8} gives mult=M1+E2 with |d=3.2 {I+21-8}; however, placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes. See comment on J|p(561 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.022 {I6} compared with 0.0089 (E1) and 0.024 (E2) favors E2. See comment on J|p(615 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0114 {I4} compared with 0.0065 (E1) and 0.0179 (E2). Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0110 {I17} compared with 0.0075 (E1) and 0.0206 (E2). Placement in the level scheme requires |D|p=yes 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I3} is consistent with mult=E2; however; the authors' suggested J|p(897 level) requires |D|p=yes. Mult=E1+M2 would require |d=0.24 {I4}. See comment on J|p(897 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.08 {I3} compared with 0.095 (E1) and 0.166 (E2). The probable J|p of the 940 level requires |D|p=no. See comment on J|p(940 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0090 {I19} compared with 0.0053 (E1) and 0.0146 (E2). The probable J|p of the 940 level requires |D|p=no. See comment on J|p(940 level) in adopted levels 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0040 {I8}, consistent with the E1 value of 0.0045; however, placement requires |D|p=no 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$On the authors' level scheme, Fig. 1, the mult for this transition is shown as M1. This is a typo. The mult is given as E1 in table I based on |a(K)exp 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
E$E|g=1039.9 {I14} from (n,|g): E=primary. 
RI$The 1871.4 level, the parent of the alternate placement, is not populated in (n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1979Ha26 in 2.2-min |b decay point out that I|g relative to the other intensities deexciting the 1181.6 level is much higher than expected based on the Alaga rule. They suggest that the 1137.1|g might be a doublet with a second and stronger component as yet unplaced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M$The transition was not observed in 2.2 min |b{+-} decay. E|g and multipolarity are from Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,TI$Transition not observed in 2.2-min {+242}Np |b{+-} decay. E|g is from Adopted Gammas and I(|g+ce) is from an intensity balance at the 147 level. I|g is from I(|g+ce) and |a 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Obscured by the 789.6|g of {+240}Np. E|g is from the level energy difference 
RI$From the Alaga rule. From (n,|g): E=secondary |g's, from the level scheme of 1972MaYS, I|g(787.8|g) is shown as being slightly larger that I|g(685.0|g), consistent with the value given by the Alaga rule 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$1979Ha26 point out that I|g relative to the other intensities deexciting the 1181.6 level is much higher than expected based on the Alaga rule. They suggest that the 1137.1|g might be a doublet with a second and stronger component as yet unplaced 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,TI$Not observed in 5.5-min {+242}Np |b{+-} decay. E|g is from Adopted Gammas. I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce 102.8|g)from the decay scheme. I|g is from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E,TI$Not observed in |b{+-} decay of {+242}Np (5.5 min). E|g is from Adopted Gammas. I(|g+ce)=I(|g+ce 159.1|g+944.8|g) from the decay scheme. I|g is from I(|g+ce) and |a. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [(M1)+E2]
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=GT
decay_comment:
M$The requirement of an intensity balance at the 306 level gives |a<0.055. For mult=M1+E2 this gives |d>1.0 and |a=0.038 {I18} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1972Sc01. Standards used by the authors are consistent with those given in 2000He14 
TI$From I|a 
RI$From I(|g+ce) and |a 
M$From Adopted Gammas 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1980VyZZ. Others: 44.52 {I10} (1955Ba31), 44.50 {I6} (1956Al41), 44.55 (1960As05). The uncertainty in the value of 1955Ba31 comes from 1956Ho54 
RI$photons per 100 {+242}Am |e decays from 1980VyZZ. Other: 0.014 from work of 1955Ba31. These authors measured the total conversion electrons of the 44.5|g relative to the |b intensity from {+242}Am |b{+-} decay to be 154/1200, with no quoted uncertainty. This ratio, along with %|b{+-}=83.0 gives Ice(44.5|g)=10.7 per 100 {+242}Am decays and thus I|g=0.014, in excellent agreement with the value from 1980VyZZ. The authors of 1955Ho67 measured I[ce(L1)+ce(L2) 44.545|g from Am |e decay]:I(ce 42.13|g) from Am |b{+-} decay)=360:1380 
M$From L2/L3=1.4 (1955Ho67). See also 1955Ba31. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$measured by 1987Mo29. 
RI$deduced by 1987Mo29 by assuming |b branch to 287 level to have log {Ift} analogous to transition in {+241}Np 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=1.1 {I3} from K x-ray/I|g observed in coincidence with |a's feeding the 287- and 330-keV levels (1971Fi01). 
$E|g=287.4 {I2} was measured in {+242}Pu(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$E|g=402.6 {I3} was measured in {+242}Pu(n,|g). 
M$|a(K)exp|<0.032 {I12} from total K| x ray and K| x ray expected from 287|g. Experimental K-shell fluorescence yield of 0.972 {I4} (1979Ah01) was used in calculations by evaluator. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E from {+247}Cm |a decay; this |g was not seen in (n,|g). 
RI from I(278|g)/I(402|g)=3.4 {I7}/72 {I6}, as measured in {+247}Cm |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E |g was obscured by 343.9|g; energy is from level scheme. 
RI from I(402|g)/I(345|g)=72 {I6}/|?1.3, as measured in {+247}Cm |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$110.8|g was observed by 1987Mo29 but was considered questionable by the evalutor due to its indistinct peak and its close proximity to the Pu K-Xray line as shown in Fig.1 in 1987Mo29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From level energy difference. 110.8|g was measured by 1987Mo29 but was considered questionable by the evalutor due to its indistinct peak and its close proximity to the Pu K-Xray line as shown in Fig.1 in 1987Mo29. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$473.1 keV and 475.3 keV gammas could not be resolved in the spectrum taken by 1983Sp03, and E|g=472.0 {I25} was listed for the doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not observed in this experiment, but seen in the work of the same group in the {+244}Pu({+47}Ti,{+47}Ti'|g) dataset (2016Ho13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:=0.90 {I19}:1.76 {I16}:1.20 {I6}:0.16 {I5}:0.42 {I5} 
TI$From the measured I|g, and the deduced |a one gets I(|g+ce)=5.0 {I12} compared with a feeding of the 41 level of |SI(|g+ce)=6.5 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=1.74 {I18}:0.35 {I3}:0.15 {I3}: |<0.02:0.12 {I2}:0.023 {I14} 
TI$From sum of Ice and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1:N2:N3:O1=13.1 {I4}:1.91 {I9}:0.38 {I2}: |<0.08: 0.46 {I3}:0.14 {I3}:0.135 {I12}: |<0.005:0.052 {I15} 
TI$From sum of Ice and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N2:N3:N4:N5:O1:O2:O3:P1:=24.7 {I13}:7.9 {I4}: 4.9 {I2}:5.6 {I3}:1.50 {I18}:0.94 {I14}:9: |<0.04: |<0.03:1.71 {I8}:0.47 {I4}:0.28 {I4}: |<0.08: |<0.08:0.39 {I2}:0.16 {I2}:0.08 {I2}:0.12 {I2} 
RI$The calculated value from I(|g+ce) and |a is 0.204 {I9} 
TI$From sum of Ice and I|g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$Ice(K)=0.040 {I16}. |a(K)exp=0.056 {I23} gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>3.1. The placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1:N2:N3:O1:O23:P1=33.0 {I16}:7.7 {I4}:1.00 {I7}:0.056 {I11}: 1.85 {I8}:0.27 {I9}:0.56 {I3}:0.082 {I22}: |<0.02:0.153 {I14}: |<0.02:0.054 {I22}. 
MR$From L3/L1 and L3/L2. All other ratios give only upper limits, the largest being 0.20 
TI,MR,CC$The adopted I(|g+ce)=45.0 {I16} is from the sum of Ice and I|g. The |d value gives |a=12.94 which, along with the measured I|g value of 3.9 {I2}, gives I(|g+ce)=54 {I3}. The difference between these two values of I(|g+ce) lies with Ice(K). From K/L=4.84 {I10} one expects Ice(K)=42.4 {I21}, compared with the experimental value of 33.0 {I16}. Expressed another way, |a(K)exp is 22% {I6} lower than the theoretical value. See the authors' comment on this discrepancy. From an intensity balance at the 504 level, one gets an upper limit on I(|g+ce)(132|g) of 47.4 {I13}. This I(|g+ce), along with I|g, gives an upper limit on |a of 11.2 {I6}, corresponding to |d|>0.53 {I10}, a value inconsistent with those from the ce ratios (excluding the K shell), all of which are <0.2. The smaller than expected Ice(K) leads to consistency with the intensity balance, but at the same time leads to an |a anomaly that needs to be investigated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1:N2:O1:P1=14.0 {I7}:2.95 {I15}:0.49 {I3}:0.068 {I19}:0.75 {I6}: 0.14 {I6}:0.20 {I2}:0.044 {I9}:0.07 {I2}: |<0.04 
TI,CC$I(|g+ce) is from a sum of Ice and I|g. |d gives |a=6.75 {I12}, which, along with I|g, gives I(|g+ce)=23.2 {I16}, compared with the experimental sum of 20.2 {I7}. Similarly as for the 132|g, |a(K)exp(165|g) is smaller than the theoretical value, in this case by 15% {I7}. See the authors' comment on this discrepancy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$From I(|g+ce) and |a 
TI$From Ice(M) and (1+|a)/ce(M)=1.357. The authors Ice values sum to 24.8 {I7}; however, the intensities of the N1, N2, O1 and higher components had to be calculated, and one notes that Ice(P1)/Ice(M1)= 0.030 {I4} compared with the theoretical values of 0.0135 {I3} and 0.0154 {I3} for M1 and E2, respectively 
M$M1:M2:M3:N3:O2:P1=15.3 {I7}:3.0 {I3}:1.0 {I1}:0.51 {I15}:0.21 {I6}:0.46 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$From Ice(L2)=0.0170 {I15} and |a(L2)=1.292 {I19}. The authors give Ice(L2)=0.027 {I10} and Ice(L3)|<0.011. The evaluator has used the L2/L3 theory value for E2 of 1.85 {I4} to deduce Ice(L2)|<0.020 and thus Ice(L2)=0.017 to 0.020. The evaluator adopts Ice(L2)=0.0185 {I15} which, in the evaluators' units, becomes 0.0170 {I15} 
M$K:L1:L2:L3= |<0.33: |<0.01:0.027 {I10}: |<0.011 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted gammas. The transition is not observed in this reaction due to the large internal conversion coefficient and the low efficiency of the gamma-sphere array at this low energy 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_comment:
E$From 1960As05 in IT decay 
M from L- and M- subshell ratios, measured by 1960As05. L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:M4:M5:N1:N2:N3:N45:O= <6:17:18:<2:13:10:8:10:<2:6:4:8:6. Uncertainties on relative subshell intensities are |?30% (1960As05). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:17.5 {I4}:7.60 {I15}:18.8 {I6}: 3.30 {I23}:0.286 {I26}. |a(L1)exp=49 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E4
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Not seen in (n,|g); however, the 48.60 level is fed from higher levels. E|g is from adopted gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=5.39 {I16}:100 {I2}:79.6 {I16}:0.66 {I11}: 20.2 {I10}:15.3 {I3}. |a(L2)exp=175 {I58} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 672.248 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 75.823 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=543 {I11} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:11.2 {I14}:0.42 {I5}:21.0 {I4}: 2.65 {I11}:0.244 {I17}. |a(L1)exp=11.7 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$Placed from the 388.112 level by 1988Sa18. Reassigned to the 99.285 level by 2007Sa03. 
M$L1:M1:M2=100 {I8}:38 {I4}:16 {I4} 
RI$The |g was masked by a plutonium x-ray (1988Sa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 given by 1988Sa18. Evaluators are unable to deduce the |d. 
M$L1:L2:L3:M2=2.00 {I22}:100 {I2}:7.1 {I4}:0.34 {I8}. |a(L2)exp=13 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 405.880 level by 2007Sa03. Placed from the 405.933 level by 1988Sa18 and reassigned by 2007Sa03. 
RI$I|g=163 {I26} for this doubly placed transition 
M$The conversion electrons l0.ie in a complex region (1988Sa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=3.0 {I4}. 
MR$1.22 {I+31-22} given by 1988Sa18. 
E$Also placed from the 417.746 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 417.746 level as tentative by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=77 {I9} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.47 {I12} given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:77.4 {I16}:67.5 {I20}:7.2 {I5}: 22.7 {I9}:159 {I3}. |a(L1)exp=3.4 {I3}. The M3 line is contaminated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=17.0 {I12}:100 {I2}:48.8 {I10}:7.3 {I9}: 40.9 {I8}:26.5 {I8}. |a(L2)exp=0.352 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.90 {I+23-18} given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I2}:13.9 {I6}:26.0 {I21}:26.2 {I5}:6.2 {I7}. |a(L1)exp=0.397 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Also placed by 2007Sa03 from the 902.494 level. Placed only from the 274.330 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=389 {I8} for this doubly placed transition 
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 
M$K:L1:L2:M1:M2=100 {I2}:18.7 {I4}:2.86 {I9}:4.51 {I9}:0.73 {I9}. |a(K)exp=1.83 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 419.085 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 289.028 level by 1988Sa18. The evaluators have not placed this gamma at the 419-keV level as there is a 88.322|g assigned to the to that level. 
M$Deduced by evalutors using the L1/L2 intensity ratio. M1+E2 with |d=1.2 given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:M1=36 {I5}:100 {I14}:32.6 {I20} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 873.996 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 296.401 level by 1988Sa18 
RI$I|g=134 {I7} for this doubly placed transition. 
MR$0.55 {I24} given by 1988Sa18 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I2}:21.3 {I4}:4.4 {I4}:1.30 {I24}:5.67 {I23}: 2.6 {I3}. |a(K)exp=1.26 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 501.569 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=171 {I9} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:L1=100 {I2}:8.6 {I21}. |a(K)exp=0.480 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 372.490 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=20 {I2} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1=705 {I5}:3.73 {I22}:100 {I2}:0.99 {I12}. |a(L3)exp=14.2 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 506.964 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=91 {I33} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$K:L2=100 {I2}:15 {I6}. |a(K)exp=0.050 {I5} 
M$E1+M2 with |d=0.054 {I+12-15} is deduced by the evaluators but not consistent with |D|p 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18. 
E$Tentatively placed from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18. Reassigned to the 330.837 level by 2007Sa03. 
M$M1:M2=100 {I43}:16 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=247 {I34} for this doubly placed transition 
E$Also placed by 2007Sa03 from the 419.085 level. Placed only from the 419.085 level by 1988Sa18. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 502.04 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. Evaluators consider the placement at 502.04-keV level questionable as the deduced multi needs |D|p=no in the 502.04-keV to 455.688-keV level 
M,MR$M1+E2 with |d=0.0606 {+34-31} deduced by evaluators but is inconsistent with placement in level scheme 
M$M2:M3=100 {I2}:18.1 {I11} 
E$Also placed from the 502.04 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
M$M2:M3=100 {I2}:18.1 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$Placed from the 400.521 level by 1988Sa18. Reassigned to the 369.207 level by 2007Sa03. 
M$L2:L3:M3=100 {I9}:43 {I5}:39 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 596.425 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18 
RI$I|g=79 {I20} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L3:M1:M3=100 {I7}:20.6 {I37}:39.4 {I16}:11.2 {I26}. |a(L1)exp=2.0 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 330.740 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=20 {I2} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1=705 {I5}:3.73 {I22}:100 {I2}:0.99 {I12}. |a(L3)exp=14.2 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$(E2) given by 1988Sa18. 
M$K:L1:L2:L3=17.5 {I12}:100 {I3}:19.3 {I25}:6.7 {I14}. |a(L1)exp=0.44 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.14 given by 1988Sa18 
E$Also placed from the 501.569 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g|?9.3 for this doubly placed transition 
M$L2:L3=100 {I15}:41 {I4}. |a(L3)exp=4.7 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 446.702 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 446.702 level by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2:L3=14.8 {I9}:100 {I2}:0.49 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1+M2)
decay_comment:
M$E1 given by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=14.8 {I13}:24 {I3}:100 {I9}:42 {I5}:13.7 {I18}. |a(L3)exp=0.45 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
M,MR$M1+M2 with |d=3.0 given by 1988Sa18. Evaluators could not deduce similar multi and |d from the conversion ratios. 
M$M1:M2:M3=0.9 {I13}:100 {I2}:18.8 {I8}. 
RI$Authors' (1998Sa18) value |? 0.2 was based on Ice(M123) and |a(M123)exp with |d=3. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 446.702 level by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 405.933 by 1988Sa18 has been reassigned by 2007Sa03. 
M$M1:M2:M3=15.2 {I9}:100 {I2}:8.4 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 200.581 level by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 405.933 by 1988Sa18 has been reassigned by 2007Sa03. 
RI$I|g=163 {I26} for this doubly placed transition 
M$The conversion electrons lie in a complex region (1988Sa18). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 681.894 level by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 405.933 by 1988Sa18 has been reassigned by 2007Sa03. 
RI$I|g=31 {I13} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2+M1
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 200.581 level by 2007Sa03. 1988Sa18 place the transition tentatively from the 417.746 level. 
RI$I|g=77 {I9} for this doubly placed transition 
MR$1.22 {I+31-22} given by 1988Sa18. 
M$|a(K)exp=3.0 {I4}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed by 2007Sa03 from the 342.805 level. Placed only from the 419.085 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=247 {I34} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 with |d=0.23 {I5} given by 1988Sa18 are inconsistent with the subshell conversion intensity ratios. 
M$L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=4.3 {I6}:100 {I2}:1.39 {I9}:1.07 {I13}:0.59 {I6}. |a(L3)exp=30 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g<|?1.0 
E$Also placed from the 906.499 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 906.499 level by 1988Sa18. 
M$M1:M2:M3=78 {I6}:100 {I4}:29 {I5}. |a(M2)exp=40 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with the subshell ratios. 
M$L2:L3:M1=100 {I3}:1.4 {I21}:27 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$E2(+M1) given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:M2:M3=2.51 {I20}:100 {I2}:16.7 {I7}:1.01 {I3}. |a(L2)exp=82 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 with |d=0.434 {I29-30} deduced by the evalutors but is inconsistent with placement in the level scheme 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M3=11.1 {I6}:58.7 {I24}:100 {I5}:2.29 {I19}:4.6 {I4}. |a(L3)exp=6.2 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 405.880 level by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 405.933 by 1988Sa18 has been reassigned by 2007Sa03. 
M$M1:M2:M3=15.2 {I9}:100 {I2}:8.4 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 376.947 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 446.702 level by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2:L3=14.8 {I9}:100 {I2}:0.49 {I19} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with the subshell ratios. 
M$L1:L2:M1=13.2 {I12}:100 {I4}:1.63 {I13} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$(M1) given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with the subshell ratios. 
M$L2:M1=20.5 {I4}:100 {I2}. |a(M1)exp=1.4 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with conversion coefficient data. 
E$Also placed from the 559.790 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=206 {I10} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:L2:M1:M2=100 {I2}:1.45 {I5}:0.58 {I3}:0.15 {I3}. |a(K)exp=7.3 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 with |d=0.5 given by 1988Sa18. The author's relative I(ce) and |a data for the subshells, as given in Table 4 of 1987SaZG are not consistent 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E2 given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with the subshell ratios. 
M$L1:L2:L3=7.9 {I14}:100 {I3}:9.1 {I17}. |a(L2)exp=0.227 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$M1(+E2) given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I13}:9.1 {I7}:47 {I5}:17.8 {I7}:2.8 {I8}. |a(L1)exp=2.1 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 373.686 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g|?9.3 for this doubly placed transition 
MR$0.14 given by 1988Sa18 
M$L2:L3=100 {I15}:41 {I4}. |a(L3)exp=4.7 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.44 {I17} given by 1988Sa18 is not consistent with the conversion electron data. 
E$Also placed from the 704.030 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:41 {I5}:41 {I8}:94 {I8}:86 {I9}. |a(L1)exp=1.1 {I3} 
RI$I|g|=67 {I16} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 311.832 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=171 {I9} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:L1=100 {I2}:8.6 {I21}. |a(K)exp=0.480 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 612.758 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=325 {I49} for this doubly placed transition 
M$(E1) given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:L3:M2=39.1 {I24}:100 {I6}:172 {I4}:23.3 {I23}. |a(L2)exp=0.15 {I3}. The L3 and M2 lines are contaminated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 330.740 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=91 {I33} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:M1:M3=20.0 {I24}:100 {I6}:11.8 {I24}:48 {I4}. |a(L2)exp=0.52 {I20}. 1988Sa18 assign mult=(M1+E2); however, placement in the level scheme requires |DJ=2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 949.660 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 949.660 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g<|?15 for this doubly placed transition 
M,MR$M1+E2 with |d=0.23 given by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:28.1 {I14}:26.0 {I8}:14.2 {I20}:6.1 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=100 {I2}:11.9 {I7}:9.5 {I6}:99.6 {I20}:3.5 {I4}. |a(L1)exp=9.0 {I21}. The M1 conversion line shows multiple structure (1988Sa18) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 704.030 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=79 {I10} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L2=100 {I9}:73 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$2.0 {I+10-5} given by 1988Sa18 
M$K:L2:L3:M3=100 {I3}:27 {I17}:37 {I6}:8.9 {I17}. |a(K)exp=0.78 {I27} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 455.688 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=206 {I10} for this doubly placed transition 
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with conversion coefficient data. 
M$K:L2:M1:M2=100 {I2}:1.45 {I5}:0.58 {I3}:0.15 {I3}. |a(K)exp=7.3 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:82 {I3}:44 {I3}:23.1 {I16}: 22.8 {I14}:16.4 {I14}. |a(L1)exp=0.0291 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 369.207 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=79 {I20} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L3:M1:M3=100 {I7}:20.6 {I37}:39.4 {I16}:11.2 {I26}. |a(L1)exp=2.0 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Placed by 1988Sa18 from the 483.640 level. Placement reassigned to the 603.889 level by 2007Sa03. 
M$(M1) given by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2=100 {I15}:27 {I4}. |a(L1)exp=0.091 {I24} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 1002.618 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 1002.618 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=81 {I15} for this doubly placed transition 
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:M1:M2=100 {I2}:14.3 {I18}:24.4 {I12}:2.4 {I12} |a(L1)exp=31 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 506.648 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18 
RI$I|g=325 {I49} for this doubly placed transition 
M$(E1) given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:L3:M2=39.1 {I24}:100 {I6}:172 {I4}:23.3 {I23}. |a(L2)exp=0.15 {I3}. The L3 and M2 lines are contaminated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.023 {I6}. 
M$The authors assign mult=E1, E2, but |a(K) agrees much better with E1, and the placement in the level scheme requires a change of parity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.82 {I18} 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I2}:16 {I3}:12 {I3}:0.9 {I3}: 5.0 {I8}: 10.4 {I12}: |a(K)exp=3.8 {I9}. The M2 line is contaminated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Placed from the 419.085 level by 1988Sa18. Placement reassigned to the 628.523 level by 2007Sa03. 
M$L1:L2:L3=75 {I6}:36 {I8}:100 {I11}. |a(L3)exp=0.077 {I16} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$0.62 {I15} given by 1988Sa18 
E$Also placed from the 675.482 by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18 has been removed by 2007Sa03. 
RI$I|g=121 {I10} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I2}:23.7 {I5}:3.9 {I4}:4.2 {I4}:8.3 {I8}: 4.1 {I8}. |a(K)exp=1.12 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$E2 given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with the subshell ratios. 
M$M1:M2:M3=0.29 {I11}:4.69 {I10}:100 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=543 {I11} for this doubly placed transition 
E$Also placed from the 75.820 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 75.820 level by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:11.2 {I14}:0.42 {I5}:21.0 {I4}: 2.65 {I11}:0.244 {I17}. |a(L1)exp=11.7 {I4} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$(M1+E2) given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:M1:M2:M3=36 {I7}:31 {I4}:100 {I3}:34.6 {I11}:17.7 {I21}. |a(M1)exp=1.22 {I14} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 given by 1988Sa18 
E$Placement from the 327.884 by 1988Sa18 has been reassigned by 2007Sa03. 
M$K:L1:L2=100 {I29}:52 {I4}:5.7 {I9}. |a(L1)exp=0.29 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Placed from the 244.381 level by 1988Sa18 but reassigned to the 675.482 level by 2007Sa03. 
M$M1+E2 given by 1988Sa18. 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I9}:65.5 {I13}:56 {I16}:18.6 {I6}: 4.3 {I5}: |a(K)exp=1.02 {I28} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 628.523 by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 330.740 level by 1988Sa18 has been removed by 2007Sa03. 
RI$I|g=121 {I10} for this doubly placed transition 
MR$0.62 {I15} given by 1988Sa18 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I2}:23.7 {I5}:3.9 {I4}:4.2 {I4}:8.3 {I8}: 4.1 {I8}. |a(K)exp=1.12 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 405.880 level by 2007Sa03. Placement from the 405.933 by 1988Sa18 has been removed by 2007Sa03. 
RI$I|g=31 {I13} for this doubly placed transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 501.569 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18 
RI$I|g=67 {I16} for this doubly placed transition 
MR$0.44 {I17} given by 1988Sa18 is inconsistent with the conversion electron data. 
M$L1:L3:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:41 {I5}:41 {I8}:94 {I8}:86 {I9}. |a(L1)exp=1.1 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 544.756 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=79 {I10} for this doubly placed transition 
M$L1:L2=100 {I9}:73 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 906.499 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=69 {I17} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:L1:L3=66 {I10}:16 {I4}:100 {I12}. |a(L3)exp=0.23 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 with |d=0.40 {I10} given by 1988Sa18 
M$L2:M1:M2:M3=5.0 {I22}:100 {I7}:302 {I9}:42 {I6}. |a(M1)exp=1.8 {I10}. The M2 conversion line is contaminated 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$(E1) given by 1988Sa18 
M$L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=30 {I6}:100 {I8}:81 {I9}:40 {I5}:205 {I8}. |a(L3)exp=0.20 {I4}. The M3 line is contaminated 
E$Not shown in the level scheme of 1988Sa18, but listed in their Table II as connecting the 372.490 and 269.854 levels. 2007Sa03 reassign this transition to the 731.225 level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 902.494 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=266 {I11} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:M1=100 {I23}:17.0 {I9}. |a(K)exp=0.35 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 296.401 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 296.401 level by 1988Sa18 
MR$0.55 {I24} given by 1988Sa18 
M$K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=100 {I2}:21.3 {I4}:4.4 {I4}:1.30 {I24}:5.67 {I23}: 2.6 {I3}. |a(K)exp=1.26 {I6} 
RI$I|g=134 {I7} for this doubly placed transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 873.996 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=266 {I11} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:M1=100 {I23}:17.0 {I9}. |a(K)exp=0.35 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 274.330 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 274.330 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=389 {I8} for this doubly placed transition 
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 
M$K:L1:L2:M1:M2=100 {I2}:18.7 {I4}:2.86 {I9}:4.51 {I9}:0.73 {I9}. |a(K)=1.83 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 420.651 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 906.499 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g<|?1.0 
M$M1:M2:M3=78 {I6}:100 {I4}:29 {I5}. |a(M2)exp=40 {I10} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 704.030 level by 2007Sa03. Unplaced by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=69 {I17} for this doubly placed transition 
M$K:L1:L3=66 {I10}:16 {I4}:100 {I12}. |a(L3)exp=0.23 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 544.756 by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 949.660 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g<|?15 for this doubly placed transition 
M,MR$M1+E2 with |d=0.23 given by 1988Sa18. 
M$L1:L2:M1:M2:M3=100 {I2}:28.1 {I14}:26.0 {I8}:14.2 {I20}:6.1 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$Also placed from the 612.758 level by 2007Sa03. Placed only from the 1002.618 level by 1988Sa18. 
RI$I|g=81 {I15} for this doubly placed transition 
M$M1 given by 1988Sa18 
M$L1:L2:M1:M2=100 {I2}:14.3 {I18}:24.4 {I12}:2.4 {I12} |a(L1)exp=31 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From I|g=53% {I8} relative to the 10- to 8- K|p=5- transition. Any higher mult would indicate that the K|p=(5+) band was being populated more strongly than the K|p=5- band, a result in conflict with the observed intensities of the K|p=(5+) band being |?1% of the K|p=5- transitions. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$|g was obscured by K|a{-2} x-ray in the {+243}Pu |b- decay. Energy is from level scheme. Authors (1969Ho10) report excess value of the observed IK|a{-2} x-ray/ IK|a{1-} x-ray to be 101 |g intensity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_mixing_ratio_info: ;ERR=AP
decay_comment:
$|a(L12)/|a(L3)=3.3 (1969Ho10); |a(L12)exp>9 from Ice(L12)/I|g(42.2|g+41.9|g) 
RI$from (Ice(L)|?39 (1969Ho10) and |a(L) from BrICC (2008Ki07)=110 for M1+8% E2. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
$Absolute photon intensity of 84|g was determined by 1969Ho10 and 1971Fi01: I|g(84|g)=27.6% (1969Ho10), 23% {I2} (1971Fi01). 
$|a(L12)exp=0.12 {I2}; L12/L3=3 (1969Ho10). See 1970Gr36 and 1971Vo13 for calculations of penetration matrix elements. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
CC$for an analogous 9/2- to 7/2- transition of 5/2[523] band in {+237}Np, |d=0.46 {I4} was determined. 
$E|g=54.2 {I5} from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$|g not observed. E|g is from level scheme. 
TI$The 25 |g is required by an intensity balance at the 109 level. With I|b{+-} |? 5 and with I(|g+ce)(34 |g) taken |? 4, an intensity balance gives I(|g+ce)(25|g) |? 8 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From 1969Ho01 
TI$The authors (1969Ho01) report Ice(L3) only. Ice(L3) value given in Table 2 (1969Ho10) is a typo and should be 0.05 {I2}. The expected multipolarity is M1+E2. Ice/Ice(L3)=3 for a pure M1 and 267 for pure E2. The authors adopt a value of approximately 3 which makes the I(|g+ce) value a lower limit assuming the M1 multipolarity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|g was obscured by K|a{-2}| x ray; energy is from level scheme. 
RI$Relative to I|g(84|g). Obtained from the observed I(K|a{-2}| x ray)/I(K|a{-1}| x ray) =0.78 {i10}. This observed value was in excess of the reported value of 0.57 in 1959Wa11. Authors (1969Ho10) report the excess of 0.21 relative to I(K|a{-1}| x ray) was from the gamma intensity. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
$Transition was not observed; E|g from level scheme. I(|g+ce) intensity of |?0.0028 from intensity balance at the 189-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$1969Fr01 suspected this |g as an impurity, however, a higher purity sample and an additional cycle of plutonium chemistry by 1969Ho10 verified that the 407.1 |g is associated with the decay of {+243}Pu 
TI$From 1969Ho10; authors assume a M1 transition with |a=0.564 from BrICC (2008Ki07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$transition was not observed in {+247}Bk |a decay; E|g is from {+243}Pu |b{+-} decay. 
RI$from I|g(41.8|g)/I|g(84|g)=3.3 {I3}/100, measured in {+243}Pu |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was suggested by 1984Vo07 from the {+243}Am(n,|g) measurement with |a(K)<0.3. (E1) is adopted by the evaluator from its level assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$If the suggested structure for the 479.6-keV level is correct, then this M1 transition is K-forbidden. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was suggested by 1984Vo07 with |a(K)<0.2. (E2) is adopted by the evaluator from its level assignment 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was listed by authors with |a(K)exp<0.1. (E1) is adopted by the evaluator from its levels scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=0.18 {I3} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I7}:48 {I5}:55 {I10}:22.3 {I13}:7.8 {I14}:10.1 {I9}:10.2 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=0.12 {I2} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I5}:43 {I5}:43 {I4}:19 {I2}:6.9 {I6}:8.3 {I7}:6.1 {I5} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=18 {I3} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1=100 {I6}:5.9 {I12}:28 {I3}:7.3 {I7}:3.0 {I4}:8 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=6.7 {I11} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:N1=100 {I9}:28 {I3}:10.3 {I12}:22.2 {I11}:3.0 {I6} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was listed by the authors with |a(K)<0.3. (E1) is assigned by the evaluator from its level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(L1)exp=1.8 {I4} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N1=100 {I7}:29 {I6}:7.4 {I9}:28 {I2}:5.6 {I7}:1.4 {I3} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=1.6 {I3} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L2:L3:M1:N1=100 {I6}:24 {I3}:12 {I3}:31 {I5}:25 {I7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp=1.34 {I25} and subshell ratio 
MR$from subshell ratio 
$L1:L2:M1:M2:N1=100 {I5}:25 {I3}:19 {I6}:8 {I4}:9 {I8} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp<0.6. |a(K)exp allows (E1,E2) as listed by authors. Level scheme requires |D|p=yes 
RI$0.083 {I16} was measured for the doubly placed 216.087-keV transition. 
M$from |a(K)<0.6 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
RI$0.104 {I18} was measured for the doubly placed 266.103-keV transition. 
M$from |a(K)exp=1.3 {I2} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
RI$0.029 {I8} was measured for the doubly placed 169.597-keV transition 
M$from |a(L1)exp=2.2 {I10}. M1 was listed by the authors 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was listed by authors with |a(K)exp<0.1. (E1) is assigned by the evaluator from its levels scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was listed by 1984Vo07 with |a(K)exp<0.04. (E1) is listed by the evaluator from its level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.38 {I11} suggests M1 multipolarity. Either the placement of this |g in the level scheme is incorrect (from 4- to (4)+), or the |g's multipolarity is E1+M2. The placement is questioned here and no multipolarity is adopted for 413.282|g. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$E1,E2 was listed by 1984Vo07 with |a(K)exp<0.2. (E2) is listed by the evaluator from its level scheme 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.3 {I2} allows M1. Authors list (M1) for 513.34|g which is placed in the decay scheme from (1)+ to 2- state. Either the placement is incorrect, or possibly the K conversion line had an impurity. Its placement on the level scheme is questioned here by the evaluator 
$(M1) was listed by authors with |a(K)exp=0.3 {I2}. 
RI$0.063 {I38} was measured for the doubly placed 513.34-keV transition 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.8 {I3} suggests M1 (or E1+M2 with a mixing ratio of E1/M2=1.0 {I+5-3}). The M1 multipolarity is not consistent with its placement in the decay scheme, and E1+M2 with a large M2 admixture is unlikely. The placement is questioned here by the evaluator; this |g ray is not shown in the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=1.9 {I10} allows M2. Authors suggest (M1) for 347.836|g which is placed in the decay scheme from (2)- to (4)- state. Either the placement is incorrect, or possibly the K conversion line had an impurity. Its placement on the level scheme is questioned here by the evaluator; this |g ray is not included in the Adopted Gammas. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.25 {I13} suggests (M1). However, the evaluator considers this transition questionable as the suggested multipolarity is not consistent with the level assignment. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.42 {I15} allows M2. Authors list M1 for 563.88|g which is placed in the decay scheme from (2)- to 2- state. Either the placement is incorrect, or possibly the K conversion line had an impurity. Its placement on the level scheme is questioned here by the evaluator 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
M$from |a(K)exp<0.6. |a(K)exp allows (E1,E2) as listed by authors. (E2) is assigned by the evaluator from its level scheme 
RI$0.083 {I16} was measured for the doubly placed 216.087-keV transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
M$From nonobservation of any ce-line, 1968Da02 suggested that 28|g was an E1 transition as any other multipolarity would have a very high conversion coefficient 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
RI$Weighted average of 1.05 {I9} and 1.06 {I7} determined by two separate methods (2013Ah03). Former value from measured absolute intensity (per 100 decays of {+249}Bk)=0.00144 {I8} and the latter value deduced from intensity balance at level 327-keV. 
M$M1 in 2013Ah03 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$From |a(K)exp|?6 (1956Ho23), K/L|=4.8 (1956Ho23 from magnetic spectrometer data, previously |?5 in 1956Sm85). 
$I|g(180)/I|g(224)=0.46 {I7} (1991Po17) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$From E|g(262.3 {I1}) from the 268 level in |e decay and E(5.5 level) from |a decay. E=56.1 is reported in |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+242}Am |b{+-} decay. Other: 42 {I3} from {+246}Cf |a decay 
M$from conversion electron ratio in {+242}Am |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$From an intensity balance at the 42 level. 
RI$From I{-(|g+ce)} and |a. 
M deduced in {+242}Am |b{+-} decay. 
CC$For the adopted energy of 42.129 {I7} 
E|g=42.13 {I5} from {+242}Am |b{+-} decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$Note that from an intensity balance at the 137 level, with the assumption of mult=E2, one gets I|g=0.0113, compared with the measured value of 0.012. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1980VyZZ. Others: 42.18 (1955Ba31), 42.2 {I3} (1955Ho67), 42.12 {I6} (1956Al41), 42.20 (1960As05) 
RI$Photons per 100 {I16}.01-h {+242}Am |b{+-} decays from I(|g+ce) and |a. 
TI$Total intensity per 100 {I16}.01-h {+242}Am |b{+-} decays from the requirement of an intensity balance at the 42 level, where I(|g+ce)(42|g)=I(|b{+-}) feeding the 42 level. Other: (|9ce 42|g)/|9I(|b{+-})=0.551 was measured by 1955Ba31. This corresponds to I(|g+ce)(42|g)=45.6% per 100 parent decays, in good agreement with the value deduced from the intensity balance. 
M$From L3/L2=0.73 (1955Ho67). Other: I(L-ray)/I|g(42.13|g)=16 {I3}/0.039 {I5} is listed in 1980VyZZ. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g listed in 1984Ho02 was calculated from the experimental electron intensities (which include beta decay activities from the 26- minute {+244}Am) and theoretical conversion coefficients, The evaluator has deduced the I|g from the requirement that I(|g+ce)(42.965|g)=100% which gives I(|g+ce)(42.965|g)=0.0048 {I10}. In addition, from intensity balance I(|g+ce)(42.965|g)=I(|g+ce)(99.383|g)=4.7 {I9}, one obtains I|g(42.965|g)=0.0044 {I8}. 
$Ice(L2): Ice(L3):Ice(M2):Ice(M3):Ice(N2):Ice(N3)= 920 {I450}:608 {I200}:118 {I25}:92 {I20}:53 {I9}:22 {I6} (1984Ho02). These values were listed by 1984Ho02 as the experimental conversion coefficients. Since the photon intensity was calculated from theoretical conversion coefficients, they are quoted here as relative ce intensities. 
$Ice L{-12}/Ice L{-3}=1.4 (1962Va08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp=0.46 {I11}, |a(L2)exp=8.3 {I19}, |a(L3)exp=5.1 {I11}, |a(M2)exp=2.6 {I6}, |a(M3)exp=1.6 {I4}, |a(N2)exp=1.25 {I27}, |a(N3)exp=0.66 {I15} (1984Ho02). 
$Ice L{-12}/Ice L{-3}=1.7, |a(total)exp=20 (1962Va08) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1)exp=0.26 {I6}, |a(L2)exp=1.27 {I28}, |a(L3)exp=0.69 {I15}, |a(M1)exp=0.08 {I4}, |a(M2)exp=0.37 {I8}, |a(M3)exp=0.25 {I5}, |a(N2)exp=0.15 {I3}, |a(N3)exp=0.20 {I4} (1984Ho02). 
$K/L=0.09, |a(K)exp=0.19, |a(L) exp=2.1, total Ice=50% (1962Va08). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$A{-2}=-0.050 {I12}, A{-4}=0.059 {I15} for (744|g)(154|g)(|q) cascade (1963Ha29). 
MR$from |g|g(|q) data of 1963Ha29 (Author had used the Rose phase convention) . Others: |d|<1.1 from |a(K)exp=0.08 {I2}, |a(L1)exp=0.012 {I4}, |a(L2)exp=0.003 {I1} (1984Ho02). |d=0.9 {I+4-3} from K/L=4.5, |a(K)exp=0.06, |a(L)exp=0.01 with a 10 % uncertainty, (1962Va08) 
$total Ice=5.8% (1962Va08),Ice(K)=4.5% (1963Ha29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$|a(K)exp=0.012 {I4}. The electron intensity was used as a calibration point for the measured |g and electron intensities (1984Ho02) 
$K/L=3.3, |a(K)exp=0.01, |a(L)exp=0.003, total Ice=0.41% (1962Va08), Ice(K)=0.30% (1963Ha29) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$I|g=0.029 listed in 1984Ho02 was calculated from the experimental electron intensities (which include beta decay activities from the 10-hour {+244}Am) and theoretical conversion coefficients, The evaluator has deduced the I|g from intensity balance: I(42.965|g from the 10.1-hour decay)|? 0.0048. Hence I(42.965|g from 26-min {+244}Am)|? 0.024 
M$see 10.1-h {+244}Am |b decay for ce measurements of 1984Ho02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$Only conversion electrons were observed by 1984Ho02. 
$Ice(K)=0.84 {I9}, Ice(L1)=0.17 {I2}, Ice(M1)=0.047 {I7}, Ice(N1)=0.012 {I6}. Ice(total) deduced by evaluator= 1.07 {I9} Intensities in units of electrons per 100 neutron captures in {+243}Am(n,|g) (1984Ho02). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E0(+M1+E2)
decay_comment:
M$Only conversion electrons were observed by 1984Ho02. The 977.92 {I7} gamma observed by 1984Vo07 in {+243}Am(n,|g), could belong to the beta decay of the 26-min isomer. In that case, I|g(977.9|g)/I|g(1084.18|g)=0.23 {I10}, measured in {+243}Am(n,|g) (1984Vo07), gives I|g(977.9|g)=0.08 {I4}. 
$Ice(K)=0.060 {I6}, Ice(L1)=0.017 {I3}. Ice(total) assumed by evaluator: I(total ce)|?Ice(K)+1.30Ice(L1)=0.082; if I|g=0.08, then I(|g+ce)|?0.16 Intensities in units of electrons per 100 neutron captures in {+243}Am(n,|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
M$The experimental K-conversion coefficient suggests M1 or M1+E2. |a(K)exp=0.03 {I1} (higher multipolarities are excluded because of beta feeding from the 1+ parent.) Since a |g transition to the 0+ g.s. cannot have M1, E2 admixture, E2 character can also be ruled out from |a(K)exp if the authors' normalization for conversion electrons is precise. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Experimental conversion coefficients do not rule out M2 and M3 multipolarities: |a(K)exp=0.09 {I3}, |a(L1)exp=0.02 {I1}. The M3 character can be ruled out based on the decay scheme. As the authors (1984Ho02) point out, the 1062- and 1105-keV gammas might be strongly hindered; conversion coefficients for anomalous E1 transitions could exceed the theoretical coefficients by a factor as large as 100. No multipolarity for the 1062.953|g is adopted. 
TI$Deduced by evaluator with |a|? 0.114 assumed from experimental conve coefficients: |a(K)+1.20|a(L1) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.14 {I11} suggests either M1, M2 or M3 multipolarity. By assuming that the decay scheme is correct, the M3 character can be ruled out. See the comment for the 1062.953|g for the possibility of an anomalous E1 transition. 
TI$Deduced by evaluator with |a|? 0.17 assumed from experimental conver coefficients: |a(K)+0.20|a(K) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$From Adopted Gammas. The gamma could not be detected by 2014So17 due to higher energy thresholds of the timing circuit. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
E$144.5 keV {I3} (1966Ah02) 
RI$|g not seen in summed spectrum due to large contamination from a 140|g in {+99}Mo (2014So17). I|g: 7.4 {I7} (1966Ah02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$490.5 keV {I5} (1966Ah02) 
RI$Corrected for contribution from {+143}Ce (2014So17). I|g: 18 {I2} (1966Ah02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$As given in the Adopted Gammas. Values derived from K/L=5.1 {I6} (1967Bu09), L/M=3.5 {I10} (1967Bu09), K/L= 5 {I1} (1955Br02). 
$%I|g=6.1 {I6} (1967Bu09), %I|g=5.6 {4} (2019Ah02) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
RI$Deduced by evaluator from the branching ratios of 240.89|g and 42.87|g observed in {+249}Cf |a decay. 
E$From {+249}Cf |a decay. E|g=36 {I5} was measured by 1955Br02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$K:L12:L3=|<0.03:0.065 {I6}:0.025 {I3}; |a(K)exp |<0.18, |a(L12)exp =0.38, |a(L3)exp =0.15 (1976Ah03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$K:L12:L3:M:NO=53.2 {I37}:11.1 {I8}:0.081 {I8}:2.86 {I21}:1.11 {I8}; |a(K)exp =1.70, |a(L12)exp =0.35, |a(L3)exp =0.0026, |a(M)exp=0.091, |a(NO)exp =0.035 (1976Ah03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$L12:L3:M:NO=2.8 {I2}:1.83 {I13}:1.35 {I13}:0.50 {I6}. (1976Ah03); |a(exp)= 16.6 (1975Ya03) 
RI$Deduced by the evaluator from total intensity provided in Fig. 10 (see note from pg.15) in 1976Ah03 and |a(BrIcc) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
$K:L12:M:NO=0.340 {I25}:0.075 {I7}:0.023 {I2}:0.010 {I2}; |a(K)exp =0.56, |a(L12)exp =0.12, |a(M)exp =0.038 |a(NO)exp =0.016(1976Ah03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$54.77 {I3} (1997Ar31), 54.77 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
M,MR$From E2/(M1+E2)=0.63 {I10} with |d= 1.3 {+4-2} from L x-ray intensities in coincidence with 333- gamma ray with nuclear cascading correction made in the L x-ray spectrum (1972Sc44). 
RI$Deduced by evaluator from intensity balance at the 54.8-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$66.80 {I4} (1997Ar31), 66.80 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.0205 {I15} (1997Ar31), 0.023 {I1} (1982Ah04) 
$Ice(L1+L2)=0.68% {I8}, Ice(M)=0.24% {I3}, Ice(N+O)|?0.08% (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$121.60 {I8} (1997Ar31), 121.60 {I4} (1982Ah04) 
RI$From unweighted average of 0.0488 {I30} (1997Ar31) and 0.036 {I3} (1982Ah04) 
$Ice(L2)=0.22% {I2}, Ice(L3)=0.14% {I2} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From Adopted Levels 
E$252.86 {I3} (1997Ar31), 252.80 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$2.63 {I10} (1997Ar31), 2.50 {I8} (1982Ah04) 
M,MR$Other: M1+E2 with |d=0.40 {I+13-15} (1977Ba67) 
$Ice(K)=4.25% {I12}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.90% {I7}, Ice(M)=0.23% {I2}, Ice(N+O)=0.08% {I1} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$From unweighted average of 240.95 {I3} (1997Ar31) and 240.86 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.218 {I8} (1997Ar31), 0.208 {I8} (1982Ah04) 
$Ice(K)=0.44% {I3}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.090% {I7} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$295.74 {I3} (1997Ar31), 295.72 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.142 {I5} (1997Ar31), 0.136 {I6} (1982Ah04) 
$Ice(K)=0.14% {I1}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.028% {I3}, Ice(M)=0.008% {I2} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$The gamma was not observed. 2015Ah03 identified the L2 line from the electron spectrum with Ice(L2)=0.10% {I2} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$95.51 {I3} (2015Ah03), 92.51 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$From unweighted average of 0.290 {I11} (2015Ah03) and 0.326 {I10} (1982Ah04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
E$266.66 {I3} (1997Ar31), 266.62 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.726 {I26} (1997Ar31), 0.690 {I25} (1982Ah04) 
$Ice(K)=0.045% {I3}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.014% {I3} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$333.37 {I3} (1997Ar31), 333.37 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$15.3 {I6} (1997Ar31), 14.6 {I4} (1982Ah04) 
M,MR$Other: E1+M2 with |d=0.084 {I+14-18} (1977Ba67) 
$Ice(K)=0.73% {I5}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.15% {I1}, Ice(L3)=0.009% {I1}, Ice(M)=0.045% {I4}, Ice(N+O)=0.014% {I1} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
E$388.13 {I3} (1997Ar31), 388.16 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
RI$66.0 {I20} (1997Ar31), 66.0 {I20} (1982Ah04) 
M,MR$Other: E1+M2 with |d=0.13 {I+1-2} (1977Ba67) 
$Ice(K)=2.95% {I10}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.64% {I5}, Ice(L3)=0.025% {I3}, Ice(M)=0.17% {I2}, Ice(N+O)=0.065% {I8} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
E$54.77 {I3} (1997Ar31), 54.77 {I2} (1982Ah04) 
M,MR$From conversion electron data measured in coincidence with |a particles with energies below the 5810.5 keV (2015Ah03). Other:|d=0.69 {I+16-15} from L x-ray intensities in coincidence with 388-keV gamma ray (1972Sc44). Note the evaluator did not include this value as the authors in 1972Sc44 were not able correct for nuclear cascading in the L x-ray spectrum. 
RI$Deduced by evaluator from intensity balance at the 442.9-keV level. 
$Ice(L1+L2)=12.3% {I9}, Ice(L3)=5.7% {I4}, Ice(M)=5.1% {I4}, Ice(N+O)=1.6% {I2} (2015Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$321.26 {I3} (1997Ar31), 321.24 {I3} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.0680 {I33} (1997Ar31), 0.063 {I3} (1982Ah04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1(+E2)
decay_comment:
$Ice(K)=0.060% {I6}, Ice(L1+L2)=0.012% {I3} (2015Ah03) 
E$255.54 {I7} (2015Ah03), 255.56 {I8} (1997Ar31), 255.45 {I3} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.035 {I3} (2015Ah03), 0.0343 {I28} (1997Ar31), 0.026 {I3} (1982Ah04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$390.8 {I1} (2015Ah03), 390.8 {I3} (1997Ar31), 390.85 {I5} (1982Ah04) 
RI$0.016 {I2} (2015Ah03), 0.0170 {I17} (1982Ah04) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$405.8 {I2} (2015Ah03), 405.94 {I6} (1997Ar31) 
RI$0.051 {I5} (2015Ah03), 0.00469 {I30} (1997Ar31) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from {+246}Bk |e decay. Others: 99.2 {I2} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (39 min) and 99.2 {I2} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 153.5 {I5} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (39 min) and 152.9 {I2} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 798.80 {I4} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 798.7 {I1} from {+246}Bk |e decay. Other: 798.8 {I3} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (39 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 734.41 {I4} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 734.3 {I1} from {+246}Bk |e decay. Other: 734.4 {I3} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (39 min) 
RI$weighted average of 65.4 {I20} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 62 {I4} from {+246}Bk |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 833.60 {I4} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 833.5 {I1} from {+246}Bk |e decay. Other: 833.6 {I3} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (39 min) 
RI$Other: 100 {I6} from {+246}Bk |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 1078.86 {I4} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 1078.8 {I1} from {+246}Bk |e decay 
RI$Other: 100 {I8} from {+246}Bk |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 982.73 {I15} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 982.2 {I2} from {+246}Bk |e decay 
RI$weighted average of 5.1 {I15} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) and 3.79 {I35} from {+246}Bk |e decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$Other: 1081.4 {I1} from {+246}Bk |e decay 
RI$from {+246}Bk |e decay. Other: 100 {I10} from {+246}Am |b{+-} decay (25.0 min) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
M$As given in the Adopted Gammas which is deduced from |a(L1)exp + |a(L2)exp=3.4 {I5}, |a(L3)exp=1.6 {I2} (2008Ro21). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$As given in the Adopted Gammas 
M$|a(K)exp<0.007, K/L<0.3 (1976Mu03). E1 |a(K)exp is in agreement with the BrIcc value of 0.00606 {I9}, however disagrees with the ratio of 5.51 {I11} from BrIcc 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
RI$Calculated from I|g(1081)/I|g(1124)=1.32 {I13} in {+246}Bk |e decay (1976Ah03). 1976Mu03 measured I|g|?10 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$no |g observed; K/L=4.2 {I5} (1976Mu03) 
TI$From experimental I(ce(K))+I(ce(L)) of 1976Mu03. K/L(E0) = 4.82 (theory) (2020Do01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.018 {I4} (1976Mu03) is in disagreement with an E1 assignment. |g is possibly a doublet. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E0
decay_comment:
M$|g not observed (1976Mu03) 
TI$deduced from I(ce(K))=0.07 {I1} (1976Mu03) with K/L(E0) = 4.82 (theory) (2020Do01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1+M2
decay_comment:
M,MR$|a(K)exp=1.0 {I4} (1976Mu03). M1 given by 1976Mu03 but disagrees with assignment in level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: ?
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=4.4 {I8} (1976Mu03). Theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.806, |a(K)(E2)=0.0632. Since this ce(K) is only 0.5 keV from the ce(L1) of the strong 244.03|g, and since 1976Mu03 do not give the Ice(L)(244.03|g) the |a(K)exp must be considered questionable. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$From Ice(L1+L2)|?35, Ice(L3)|?30, Ice(M)=18.5 {I14}, and Ice(N+O)=7.3 {I6} (1976Ah03). 
M$L1+L2:L3|? 35:30 (1976Ah03) M:N+O= 18.5 {I14}:7.3 {6} (1976Ah03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
TI$From Ice(L1+L2)=1.86 {I14}, Ice(L3)=1.25 {I9}, Ice(M)=0.89 {I17} (1976Ah03) 
M$L1+L2:L3:M= 1.86 {I14}:1.25 {I9}:0.89 {I7} (1976Ah03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$K:L1+L2:L3:|a(K)exp:|a(L1+L2)exp:|a(L3)exp:K/L= 0.32 {I2}:0.055 {I4}:0.005 {I1}:0.0052:0.0009:0.000081:|?5.2 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
M$M:N+O=2.6 {I2}:0.76 {I8}(1976Ah03). M1,E2 given by 1976Ah03. Note that BrIccMixing code gives a high reduced |h{+2} 
TI$From I(ce(M))=2.6 {I2}, Ice(N+O)=0.76 {I8}, (1976Ah03) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
M$|a(K)exp=0.0061,|a(L1+L2)exp=0.0013, K:L1+L2= 0.019 {I13}:0.004 {I1} (1976Ah03); |a(K)exp|<0.01 (1966Or01) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$From 1972Sc01 
RI$From intensity balance and conversion coefficient 
M$L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N2:N3:O2:O3:P23= 13.3 {I15}:445 {I14}:344:107.5 {I30}:102.5 {I30}:31.6 {I12}:31.6 {I12}: 9.1 {I10}:9.1 {I10}:3.8 {I10} (1971Ch15). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
$I|g(226) relative to 285|g=25 {I7} was measured by 1967Or02. 
$|a(K)exp=6 {I3} estimated from comparison of ce and |g. |a(K)exp=6 {I5} in {+251}Cf |a decay (2003Ah07). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$|a(L1+L2):|a(L3):|a(M+N)=23.5 {I31}:3.3 {I8}:11.0 {I17} (2003Ah07) 
$|a(K):|a(L1+L2):|a(L3):|a(M):|a(N)=0.24 {I5}:1.0 {I1}:0.5 {I1}:0.7 {I1}:0.37 {I5} (1970BrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
$|a(K):|a(L1+L2):|a(L3):|a(M+N)=6.0 {I5}:2.7 {I3}:0.41 {I5} :1.53 {I17} (2003Ah07) 
$|a(K):|a(L1+L2):|a(L3):|a(M):|a(N)=7 {I2}:3.7 {I6}:0.6 {I2}:2.1 {I4} :0.85 {I15} (1970BrZN) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
$Since an E1 transition from 5/2[622] to 9/2[734] state would be K forbidden, there might be some M2 admixture in 265.86 |g. |a(M2)=7.10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(K):Ice(L1+L2):Ice(L3):Ice(M+N)=0.19 {I3}:0.71 {I8}:0.31 {I3}:0.41 {I5} (2003Ah07) 
$Ice(K):Ice(L1+L2):Ice(L3):Ice(M):Ice(N)= 4.1 {I6}:18 {I1}:9 {I1}:12 {I1}:6.4 {I10} (1970BrZN) 
$|a(K)exp=0.25, |a(exp)=1.27 (1968Ch03). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,M$from adopted gammas. This transition has not been seen in 23.7-h {+248}Bk |e decay 
RI,TI$an intensity balance at the g.s. yields I(|g+ce)=22 {I5} and I|g=0.022 {I5} per 100 |e decays 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from 1971Wa28. Others: 42 (1955As42), 43.4 (1956Ho54) 
RI$I|g per 100 |a decays (1971Wa28). Other: 0.014 (1955As42) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_comment:
E$from adopted gammas. E|g=160 {I15} is reported by 1963Le17 in |a decay 
RI$see comment on I|a(5826|a) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E2
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$this transition is not seen in |a decay. E|g is from adopted gammas, and I|g is from I(|g+ce)=I|a with |a as given 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 60.8 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 60.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 60.8 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 73.6 {I3} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 73.6 {I3} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 73.6 {I3} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 134.6 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 134.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 134.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 86.0 {I2} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 86.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 86.0 {I2} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$unweighted average of 240.253 {I9} from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's, 240.6 {I1} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 240.6 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), and 240.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 
RI$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1]
decay_comment:
E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy difference=240.90 
E$unweighted average of 240.780 {I20} from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's, 240.6 {I1} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 240.6 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), and 240.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 
RI$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 150.6 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 150.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 150.6 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 192.5 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 192.5 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 192.5 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 
RI$unweighted average of 47.0 {I28} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 32.3 {I20} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 40.2 {I20} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 44 {I5} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
M$D from the ratio I|g(in-plane)/I|g(out-plane) in the one-neutron stripping reaction {+248}Cm({+16}O,{+15}O|g) (2008Is05). M1 can be ruled out from RUL. 
E$from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g) . Others: 100 {I5} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 100 {I5} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), and 100 {I6} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 185.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 185.0 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), 185.0 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g), and 185.2 {I5} from ({+209}Bi,{+208}Bi|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's. Others: 422.0 {I1} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 422.0 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), and 422.0 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 470.198 {I9} from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's, 470.1 {I2} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 470.1 {I2} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), and 470.1 {I2} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 
RI$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's. Others: 468.1 {I3} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 468.1 {I3} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), and 468.1 {I3} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 
RI$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's. Others: 494.3 {I2} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), 494.3 {I2} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), and 494.3 {I2} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 
RI$from (n,|g)E=th:secondary |g's 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 199.6 {I2} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 199.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), 199.6 {I2} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g), and 199.3 {I5} from ({+209}Bi,{+208}Bi|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g). Others 85 {I5} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), and 82 {I5} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g) 
RI$from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g). Others 54 {I4} from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g), and 54 {I4} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E2)
decay_comment:
E$from ({+13}C,{+12}C|g). Others: 233.7 {I1} from ({+16}O,{+15}O|g), 233.7 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+17}O|g), 233.7 {I1} from ({+18}O,{+16}On|g), and 234.4 {I5} from ({+209}Bi,{+208}Bi|g) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=50 {I4} 
M$Q from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=2.6 {I7}. |d|?0.1 assumed by authors for a significant mixing of E2 (2008Is05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)=82 {I6} 
M$D from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=0.9 {I2}, |d |?0.1 assumed by authors for a significant mixing of E2 (2008Is05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$D or Q from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=0.99 {I8}. Note that the 192.5|g contain intensities from 193.5|g which affects the intensity ratios, and hence the evaluator is unable to deduce the multipolarity 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$Q from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=2.6 {I7}. |d |?0.1 assumed by authors for a significant mixing of E2 (2008Is05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M$D from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=0.9 {I2}, |d |?0.1 assumed by authors for a significant mixing of E2 (2008Is05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)= 52 {I4} 
M$Q from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=2.6 {I7}. |d |?0.1 assumed by authors for a significant mixing of E2 (2008Is05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
$I(|g+ce)= 85 {I5} 
M$D from I|g(in)/I|g(out)=0.9 {I2}, |d |?0.1 assumed by authors for a significant mixing of E2 (2008Is05) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Ice(M):Ice(N+O)=1650 {I200}:620 {I60}. 
$1.2 {I2}|<I|g|< 34 {I4} from Ice(M) and |a(M)(E2)=1360 {I50}, |a(M)(M1)=48.8 {I12} If |d(29.9|g)=0.124 {I4}, as it is for the similar intraband transition, 32.6|g in {+241}Am (see 2005Ma88) and |a(M)(M1+E2)=68.7 {I23}; |a(N+O)(M1+E2)=25.95 {I82} (BrICC: 2008Ki07), then I|g (weighted average)=23.1 {I18}. With |a=361 {I12}, I(|g+ce)= 87 {I11} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1+E2]
decay_comment:
$Ice(M):Ice(N+O)=370 {I40}:140 {I20}. 
$1.4 {I2}|<I|g|<21 {I2} from Ice(M) and |a(M)(E2)=260 {I8}, |a(M)(M1)=17.9 {i4}. If |d(42.0|g)=0.13 {I2}, as it is for the similar intraband transition, 41.805 |g in {+249}Bk (see 2011Ab07) and |a(M)(M1+E2)=21.9 {I14}; |a(N+O)(M1+E2)=7.65 {I41}, then I|g (weighted average)=17.4 {I17} With |a=117 {I7}, I(|g+ce)= 21.1 {I31} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From |a(exp) and |a(theory)(BrICC: 2008Ki07) 
$|a(K)exp=0.38, |a(L)exp=0.08; Ice(K):Ice(L)=13 {I2}:2.8 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
MR$From |a(exp) and |a(theory)(BrICC: 2008Ki07) 
$|a(K)exp=0.24, |a(L)exp=0.06; Ice(K):Ice(L)=13 {I2}:3.1 {I9} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$the requirement of an intensity balance at the 151.3+y level gives |a(80.7|g)=42 {I+9-7} from which one gets mult(80.7|g)=M1+E2 with |d=1.4 {I+14-7} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 with |d=0.140 {I+39-23} deduced from conversion coefficient data in {+253}Es |a decay; E2 excluded as B(E2)(W.u.) upperbounds exceeds RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_BM_unit: mu^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM1;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM1W
decay_comment:
M$M1+E2 with |d=0.143 {I4} deduced from conversion coefficient data in {+253}Es |a decay; E2 excluded as B(E2)(W.u.) upperbounds exceeds RUL 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 368.76 {I6} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 368.77 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 389.0 {I2} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 389.17 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) |b{+-} decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 421.3 {I2} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 421.39 {I3} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 136.9 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 136.81 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 168.8 {I2} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 168.8 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 180.5 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 180.52 {I8} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [M1,E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 518.5 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 518.60 {I8} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 191.6 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 191.7 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 529.5 {I2} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 530.0 {I3} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 560.4 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 560.42 {I5} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 634.3 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 634.2 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 621.9 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 621.7 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$weighted average of 652.8 {I1} from {+249}Cm |b{+-} decay and 652.7 {I2} from {+253}Es |a decay (20.47 d) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Deduced by evaluator from level-energy difference. 
TI$Deduced by evaluator from intensity balance at g.s., with I|b to g.s.=0; |SI|g(1+|a) to g.s.=100 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [M2]
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E$Deduced by the evaluator from level energy difference. 
TI$I(|g+ce)(8.77|g)= 2.59 {I27} deduced by evaluator from intensity balance 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$L1/L2=4.35 {I3}, L1/L3=11.33 {I15}, L2/L3=2.60 {I4} (1964No08); L1:L2:L3=100: 23.1: 9.1, M1:M2:M3=22.1: 7.1: 2.3, L/M=4.2 (1965Ho13) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$The transition was observed between 597.7 and 542.1. The difference in energy=55.6, while the authors in 2005Ah03 report 54.2 keV. This value does not fit with their level scheme. Therefore, the evaluator adopts 55.6 instead 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
E$ poor fit possibly due to doublet. Level-energy difference=368.59. 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.42 {I11} (1971HoZQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (M1)
decay_comment:
E$ poor fit possibly due to doublet. Level-energy difference=441.98. 
M$ |a(K)exp=0.44 {I13} (1971HoZQ) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$the transition was observed between 723.2 and 519.2. The difference in energy=204.0, while the authors report 202.1 keV. This value does not fit the level scheme. Therefore, the evaluator adopts 204.0 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=CA;ERR=?
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
E,RI$ E|g|?1033.3, I|g|?1.0|*10{+-6}; I|g deduced from excess counts of 1031.85 peak in {+250}Bk |b-decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$ Possible alternate placement as decay-out transition from a 1040 level. Assignment to 1134 level based on agreement with calculated energies using rotational constant deduced by 2005Ah03 for the {7/2[633]~#0{+-}}7/2- band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
E$Possible alternate placement as decay-out transition from a 1040 level. Assignment to 1228 level based on agreement with calculated energies using rotational constant deduced by 2005Ah03 for the {7/2[633]~#0{+-}}7/2- band. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: [E1]
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1;ERR=AP;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W;ERR=AP
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
The N-, O-, P- subshell, and the total conversion coefficient were calculated by 1991Ba63 for 0.95-, 1.1- and 1.25-keV |g transitions with E1 multipolarity. The authors calculated total |a(1.1|g)=986. 
From intensity balance in {+254}Es |a decay, 30% of I(|g+ce) from the 35.59 level decays through the 1.12-keV |g 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
This transition was not observed; existence was deduced from |a|g-coincidence data observed in 39.3-h {+254}Es |a decay. 
E from level scheme. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E deduced from level energies shown in 1982HoZE. |g energy was not given in the decay scheme of 1982HoZE. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_comment:
This |g could deexcite the 406-keV level, if it is also populated by an |a from {+254}Es g.s. An E1 |g transition would Be expected between the J|p,K=6+,6(p 5/2[642],n 7/2[613]) and 5-,5(p 3/2[521],n 7/2[613]) states. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)|?30 from intensity balance at the 34.47-keV level, if there are no other |g transitions feeding the 35.59-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: (E1)
decay_comment:
RI I|g=1.6% {I4} was measured by 1988Po05. 
M from nonobservation of conversion electrons, 1966Mc02 deduced that this |g is an E1 transition. 
This |g's placement between the 97.49- and 35.59-keV levels is not consistent with configuration assigned for these levels: the transition from the (p 3/2[521],n 7/2[613]) state to the (p 7/2[633],n 1/2[620]) state would require both proton and neutron states to change. Some configuration mixing in either or both of these levels can explain this transition. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
TI deduced from intensity balance at the 155.5-keV level, by assuming that any other |g feeding the level can be neglected. I(|g+ce)|?3 was measured by 1966Mc02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1+E2)
decay_comment:
I(|g+ce)=0.9 from intensity balance at the 167.09-keV level. I|g=0.013 {I5}, if I(|g+ce)=0.9, |a=69 {I24}. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_multipolarity: (M1,E2)
decay_comment:
I|g=0.16% {I7} is listed in 1988Po05. However, the intensity balance at the 241-keV level, by using I|a(6275|a)=0.14 {I2} feeding the level and |a(M1; 85.1|g)=13.3, |a(E2; 85.1|g)=44.6, suggests I|g<0.01%, I(|g+ce)=0.14 {I2}; any possible |g feeding the 241-keV level is assumed negligible. Very weak L-subshell electrons were observed and I(|g+ce)<<1 is listed in 1966Mc02. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
1991Ba63 calculated total conversion coefficient to be |a(1.1|g)=986. See 1991Ba63 for N, O, P, Q subshell-conversion coefficients. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_comment:
M |a(L)exp(175.7|g)=2.8 {I8}, obtained from (6382|g)(ce) delayed coincidence data (contribution from ce(177.3|g) was subtracted), and |a(K)exp(175.7|g)=1.8, obtained by 1973Ah04 from (6382|a)(K| x ray,175.7|g) delayed coincidence data, do not yield consistent mixing ratio: |a(L)exp suggests E1+M2, |d=0.67 {I14}, and |a(K)exp=1.8 yields |d=0.3. By considering the fact that K/L(exp)=0.64 does not agree with 175.7|g being E1+M2 (K/L=4.29 for E1, 2.16 for M2), it is likely that L-electron intensity was overestimated. 
CC E1+M2 (E1 part is K-forbidden) is assumed: |a(E1)=0.1479, |a(M2)=31.8; |a(M2/E1=0.09)=2.76. 
FOR MR=0.67, CC=9.96 AND BM2W=0.9 3; FOR MR=0.3, CC=2.79 AND BM2W=0.30 10. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
This transition was not observed; existence was deduced from (6382|a)(|g) coincidences observed. 
Transition intensity is deduced from intensity balance at the 211.8-keV level. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
See a comment in the 275.7-d {+254}Es |a decay, also in the adopted levels sets about its placement. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_uncertain: S
decay_comment:
This transition was not observed; its existence was deduced from |a|g-coincidence data observed in 39.3-h {+254}Es |a decay. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_multipolarity: M1
decay_comment:
Multipolarity was shown in the level scheme of 1982HoZE as M1+E2. Assuming that the placement of 40.82|g between the 0+ and 1+ states is correct, mult=M1+E2 given by 1982HoZE is taken as a mistake. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_energy_info: ;ERR=?
decay_comment:
E$ from 'adopted levels, gammas' dataset for {+250}Bk in ENSDF database, 0.1 keV uncertainty assumed by the compilers for least-squares adjustment procedure 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: [E2]
decay_comment:
RI$intensity determination is made difficult due to the presence of a 407-keV |g ray in {+198}Pt from Coulomb excitation of the first 2+ state in the target. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1+L2):Ice(L3):Ice(M):Ice(N+O)= 33 {I3}:14.5 {I15}:12.2 {I13}:5.2 {I6} 
MR$From |a(M)(exp) and |a(theory)(BrICC: 2008Ki07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
$Ice(L1+L2):Ice(L3):Ice(M):Ice(N+O)=7.8 {I8}:|?2:2.9 {I4}:1.1 {I2} 
MR$From |a(M)(exp) and |a(theory)(BrICC: 2008Ki07) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_comment:
RI$I|g per 100 |b{+-} decays from I|g/|SI(|b{+-}) and also from I|g/I|a({+248}Bk) 
M |a(K)exp=0.009 {I2} deduced by 1978Gr10 from Cf K| x ray/I|g(550.7|g). 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$550.6|g in delayed coin with 69|g, 96|g, 164|g, 224|g, 271|g, 323|g, 333|g, 388|g, 429.6|g, 494|g, 599|g, 640|g, 727|g, 731|g, 911|g, 915|g, 926|g, 979.4|g, 1042.0|g, 1176|g, 1226|g, and 1283|g; and in prompt coin with 488|g, 1190|g, and 1257|g 
$B(E1) in e{+2}b units 
$E1 hindrance factor=4.59|*10{+6} {I14}, consistent with |DK=2, but |DK=1 and 3 are not excluded 
M$from the Adopted dataset for {+248}Cf in the ENSDF database (Sept 2014 update) 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: E1
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE1
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE1W
decay_comment:
$47.8|g in delayed coin with 175|g, (323|g), (384|g), 461.1|g, and 1175|g; and in prompt coin with 588|g 
$B(E1) in e{+2}b units 
$E1 hindrance factor=2.3|*10{+4} {I6} (2022Or04), consistent with |DK=0, 1 or 2. 
$Note that 2022Or04 assigned transition branching ratio of 66% {I18} for the 47.8-keV transition, not 100%, on which basis B(E2), B(E2)(W.u.) and E1 hindrance factor were deduced. 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_BE_unit: e^2 x (fm)^6
decay_BE_info: ;TYPE=BE3;ERR=CONV
decay_BEW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BEW_info: ;TYPE=BE3W
decay_BM_unit: mu^2 x (fm)^2
decay_BM_info: ;TYPE=BM2;ERR=CONV
decay_BMW_unit: Weisskopf
decay_BMW_info: ;TYPE=BM2W
decay_comment:
M$From analysis of anomalous M2 conversion coefficients (1993Li52) 
E$Other: 144.8 {I4} from {+253}Fm |a decay 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M2+E3
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(L1)exp=13.0 {I26}, |a(L2)exp=6.1 {I12}, |a(L3)exp=4.7 {I9} |a(M1+M2)exp=5.5 {I11}, |a(M3+M4+M5)exp=1.59 {I32}, |a(N)exp=2.89 {I57} 


decay_energy_unit: KEV
decay_relative_intensity_unit: %
decay_multipolarity: M1+E2
decay_comment:
M,MR$From |a(L1)exp=23.2 {I59}, |a(L2)exp=32.2 {I77}, |a(L3)exp=16.7 {I33}, |a(M1+M2)exp=15.0 {I40}, |a(M3+M4+M5)exp=6.0 {I15} 


