# LEVEL

level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$from |g(|q) in (|a,4n|g) and M1+E2 |g to (17/2)-. 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+130}Te({+14}N,5n|g) (2012BhZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-,11/2,13/2-
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.1 via 11/2- parent; |gs to 9/2- and 13/2-. Also L(p,t)=(3) for a level at |?2240 from 5/2+ target suggests negative parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2,15/2)-
level_comment:
15/2, 19/2 from |g(|q). |=15/2 since 246|g seen intensely in (|a,4n|g) and feeding from high-spin levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1979Ke07 (E=20 MeV. 708|g(t); |?10 T{-1/2}'s). Other: 44 ns {I4} from analysis of 708|g(|q,H,t), |?3 T{-1/2}'s. 
G from 708|g(|q,H,t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J atomic beam (1972Ek04), log| {Ift}=4.4 to 0+ 
T$weighted average of 3.39 min {I1} (1965Eb01), 3.40 min {I2} (1968Bo25), 3.36 min {I5} (1977Ca12), 3.28 min {I10} (2010NiZR), 3.5 min {I3} (2000Le02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
%IT$no other decay modes reported 
T from IT decay (1975Sc17). Others; 0.54 |ms {I2} (1964Kr02) (IT decay), 0.5 |ms (1973GuZD) (p,n|g) 
J$5+,6+,7+ from L(p,{+3}He)=6; D,E2 |g to 3+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
%IT$no other decay modes reported 
J L=(7) in (p,{+3}He), L=5 in (p,d) and (d,t), shell model 
T from 1964Kr02. Others: 3.0 |ms {I6} (1969Iv02,1973GuZD), 2.5 |ms {I4} (1975Sc17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4)-
level_comment:
J L=5 in (d,t), L=(5) in (p,{+3}He), |g to 3+ 
E,J large S=3.2 in (d,t) may suggest a doublet structure for the level with components J=4- and J=6- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
J L=4+6 in (p,{+3}He), L=2 in (d,t) (if levels 1204 {I2} in (d,t) and 1220 {I20} in (p,{+3}He) are identical) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E$Adopted value; 763.9 {I5} from 1973GuZD 
T from 1964Kr02. Others: 3.0 |ms {I6} (1969Iv02, 1973GuZD), 2.5 |ms {I4} (1975Sc17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
MOMM1$by optical double resonance method 
MOME2$by collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy; others: -0.0589 {I42} (atomic beam) and -0.024 (1978LeZA) 
J L=2 in ({+3}He,d), atomic beam (1976Fu06) 
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}: 4.8919 fm {I50} (2013An02, compilation); 5.19 fm {I22} in (e,e'p) (1993La16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$by Mossbauer effect method (re-evaluated by 2014StZZ); others: 2.8 {I2} (1971Ka08), +3.1 {I2} (1973Gr15), +2.78 {I+12-6} (1971Be11) 
T {+141}Ce |b{+-} decay (1966Bl08). Others from {+141}Ce |b{+-} decay: 1.82 ns {I4} (1972Ga39), 1.91 ns {I6} (1968Ra02), 1.83 ns {I4} (1967Ba27); from (n,n'|g): >1.23 ps (2008Sc17) 
J L=4 in ({+3}He,d), |g to 5/2+ is M1+E2 
Radius(rms)=5.21 fm {I20} in (e,e'p) (1993La16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from |g(|q,H,t) in (|a,2n|g) (1984Go12); other: +7.2 {I4} (1974Ej01) 
T from (|a,2n|g) (1981Pr09). Others: 4.8 ns {I3} (p,2n|g) (1981Ko16), 5.1 ns {I3} (|a,2n|g) (1975Fr18), 4.80 ns {I25} (|a,2n|g) (1973Ej02), 4.6 ns {I1} (|a,2n|g) (1984Go12), >0.76 ps (n,n|g) (2008Sc17) 
J L=5 in ({+3}He,d), |g to 5/2+ is E3, |g to 7/2+ is M2 
Radius(rms)=5.64 fm {I22} in (e,e'p) (1993La16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is E2, L=0 in ({+3}He,d); contradicts with A{-2}=-0.10 {I5} in (p,2n|g) for |g to 5/2+ 
Radius(rms)=4.93 fm {I24} in (e,e'p) (1993La16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g(|q) for |g from 5/2+ 7632 resonance in (|g,|g'), |g to 7/2+ is M1+E2 and is much stronger than |g to 5/2+. This eliminates the possibility of J=3/2 allowed by |g(|q) in (|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is |DJ=2 E2, |g to 11/2- 
T$other: 179 fs {I22} (from B(E2)|^=0.057 {I7}, 2007Sc18, (|g,|g')) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g to 7/2+ is E1, |e feeding from 3/2+; |p contradicts direct excitation observed in Coul. ex. (1980An22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g to 5/2+ is (E2) and |g to 7/2+ is (M1+E2) 
T$other: 159 fs {I13} (from B(E2)|^=0.040 {I4}, 2007Sc18, (|g,|g')) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$from |g(|q,H,t) in (|a,2n|g) (1984Go12) 
J |g to 11/2+ is |DJ=2 E2; no |g's to J<11/2 
T from (|a,2n|g); other: >10.4 fs (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$L=3 in (|a,|a'); suggested 3/2-,5/2-,7/2- in (n,n'|g) (1994De56), but 5/2+,7/2+ in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-,11/2-,13/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$|g to 11/2+ is (E1). 2008Sc17 in (n,n'|g) adopted (13/2-) from (E3) |g to 7/2+ but this greatly exeeds RUL limits, reason for which (13/2-) is not adopted here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2,9/2,11/2+) from |g's to 7/2+ and 9/2+ and (11/2,13/2) from excitation function in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(3/2+,5/2,7/2,9/2+) from |g's to 5/2+ and 7/2+; (5/2-,7/2-) more probable in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) based on excitation function and decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2,9/2,11/2+) from |g's to 7/2+ and 9/2+; (11/2+) more probable in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) based on excitation function and decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$(3/2+,5/2,7/2+) from |g's to 3/2+ and 7/2+; (5/2-) more probable in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) based on excitation function and decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from (|a,2n|g) (1981Pr09) 
J$|g to 19/2- is |DJ=1 M1+E2 and based on syst that favours 21/2- adopted in ({+7}Li,4n|g) and not 17/2- adopted in (|a,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_comment:
J$(1/2+,3/2,5/2+) from |g's to 1/2+ and 5/2+; (1/2+) more probable in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) based on excitation function and decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2+,9/2)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2,9/2,11/2+) from |g's to 7/2+ and 9/2+; (11/2+,9/2) more probable in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) based on excitation function and decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
J$(3/2+,5/2,7/2,9/2+) from |g's to 5/2+ and 7/2+; (3/2+) more probable in (n,n'|g) (2008Sc17) based on excitation function and decay behavior 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from (|a,2n|g) (1981Pr09) 
J$|g to 21/2+ is |DJ=1 M1, no |g to levels with J<21/2; maximum alignment of |p(g{-7/2}d{-5/2}){+9} configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 21/2+ is D+Q and possible configuration 
$Possible configuration=|p(g{-7/2}d{-5/2}){+9}~# |n(f{-7/2}h{-11/2}{+-1}) in ({+7}Li,4n|g) (2015Li21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (35/2-)
level_comment:
J$based on possible configuration=|p(g{-7/2}d{-5/2}){+8}h{-11/2}{+1} with maximum angular momentum of 35/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
T |G from 1979Mo19. Other: 0.133 eV {I23} (1969Mo11) 
J |g(|q) and polarization of 7632|g M1 in (|g,|g') (1972Wo21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured by 1981Pr09. Others: 5.1 ns {I3} (1975Fr18), 4.80 ns {I25} (1973Ej02), 4.6 ns {I1} (1984Go12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
J$adopted value is (9/2+) 
E,S not resolved; the authors (1976AdZR) assumed that |s(1600)/|s(1650)=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}=22.0|*10{+-3} {I3} 
$g|G{-0}=6.6|*10{+-3} {I17} for alternative assignment 
S$2.2 {I6} for alternative assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$g|G{-0}=15.8|*10{+-3} {I22} 
S$2.0 {I6} for alternative assignments 
T$0.0064 eV {I18} for alternative assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J |g(|q) for |g's to 5/2+ and 7/2+, |g to 3/2+ 
|G{-|g0}/|G{-|g}=0.47 {I10} (1991BeZX), |G{-|g0}=0.030 eV {I10} (1991BeZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: EV
level_comment:
J |g(|q) for |g's to 5/2+ g.s. and 7/2+, |g to 5/2+ is E1 
T |G from 1979Mo19. Other: 0.133 eV {I23} (1969Mo11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (35/2-)
level_comment:
$Possible configuration=|p(g{-7/2}d{-5/2}){+8}h{-11/2}{+1} which gives maximum angular momentum of 35/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T weighted average: 19.14 h {I5} (1966Ot03), 19.09 h {I7} (1968La17) 
E from (n,|g). See 1985AlZN 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), first-forbidden unique |b{+-} transition to 0+ {+142}Nd g.s. (1966Be12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J L=3 in (d,p); |g from 4- is dipole [|g(|q) in (n,|g) on oriented nuclei], dipole |g from 2+ neutron resonance E(n)=519 eV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
J |g(|q) for 140.9|g in (n,|g) on oriented nuclei; |g from 3+ neutron resonances and no |g from 2+ neutron resonances in (n,|g), L=3 in (d,p) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E from (n,|g) (1968Ke08) 
T from growth and decay of 1570|g(t) in {+142}Pr(g.s.) |b{+-} decay. T{-1/2}(g.s.) was taken as 19.2 h (1967Ke05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_comment:
J$10+ or 8+ from mult(126|g) to 911,(9+) level, the lower spin preferred from systematics of N=83 nuclei, as discussed by 2019Li54 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
J$11+ or 9+ from mult(392|g) to 911,(9+) level, the lower spin preferred from systematics of N=83 nuclei, as discussed by 2019Li54 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
MOMM1 Colinear fast beam laser (1994Ii01). 
MOME2 Colinear fast beam laser (1994Ii01). 
T weighted average: 13.59 d {I4} (1957Pe09), 13.59 d {I10} (1963Ho15), 13.55 d {I2} (1965Is03), 13.57 d {I2} (1971Ba28). Other: 13.76 d {I5} (1957Wr37) 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), |g from 5/2+ is M1+E2 
|m,Q: from 1994Ii01, collinear fast-beam LASER spectroscopy (CFBLS) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average: 4.20 ns {I7} (1963Bo22), 4.17 ns {I9} (1963Gr38), 4.16 ns {I7} (1965Na06), 4.05 ns {I12} (1969MuZO) 
J log| {Ift}=7.7 via 3/2- parent; analysis of |m; |g to 7/2 is D+Q 
MOMM1$Time dependent perturbed angular correlation (1977Ne12). Others values: +3.28 {I13} (1964Ko15), +2.60 {I20} (1966Zm01). Others: 1989Ra17. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T average: 49 ps {I7} (1966Go20), 68 ps {I8} (1969MuZO) 
J |g ray to 5/2+ is M1+E2, |b|g(|q) is isotropic and rules out 7/2, |g|g(|q) rules out J=5/2 (1977Ra18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average: 4.20 ns {I7} (1963Bo22), 4.17 ns {I9} (1963Gr38), 4.16 ns {I7} (1965Na06), 4.05 ns {I12} (1969MuZO) 
MOMM1 +3.28 {I13} (1964Ko15). Other: +2.60 {I20} (1966Zm01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T from 1975He03; others: 17.27 min {I4} (1957Pe09), 17.30 min {I5} (1963Ho15), 17.3 min {I1} (1968Ra01,1970Fa03) 
J first-forbidden unique |b{+-} branch to 2+ level in {+144}Nd; J|p=0- from |b|g(|q), |g|g(|q), |b|g(circular polarization) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J 59|g to 0- g.s. is M3 
T from Pr K|a| x ray(t) (1970Fa03) in IT decay. Other: 6.6 min {I10} K| x ray(t) in (1976Ch33) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J 80|g to 0- g.s. is M1 
T weighted average: 125 ps {I14} (1962Bu09,1962Bu22), 143 ps {I11} (1964Mc22) 
|m: from |g|g(|q,H) (1975Ba32). Other: -4.3 {I14} (1973Si01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J L=4 in (d,{+3}He) for the g.s. and 2 for 62 level with a connecting M1 transition establish J|p(g.s.)=7/2+ and J|p(62)=5/2+ 
T from 1980Ge11. Others: 5.98 h {I2} (1964Ho03), 5.95 h {I7} (1954Ma07), 5.88 h {I10} (1960Al33) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J L=2, small |s in (d,{+3}He) suggests low proton occupancy and therefore favors 3/2+ and not 5/2+ (d5/2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is E1, log| {Ift}=4.94 from {+145}Ce g.s. is compatible only with configuration=(|p 5/2[532]) for 787.3 level in {+145}Pr and configuration=(|n 3/2[532]) for {+145}Ce g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Logft=7.5 in {+145}Ce |b{+-} decay from J|p=(3/2)- suggests possible spin/parity values of 1/2+,3/2+, or 5/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
J L=2 in (d,{+3}He), intense |g ray to 7/2+ 
E 1090 in (d,{+3}He) (1981VaZJ); 1084 in (d,{+3}He) (1978SaZP) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$log| {If{+1u}t}=9.31 in |b{+-} decay to {+146}Nd g.s., (J|p=0+) 
T$weighted average of 24.15 min {I18} (1980Ge10), 24.0 min {I1} (1964Ho03), 24.4 min {I5} (1953Ca10), 24.6 min {I3} (1950Sc85) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$M1 |g from (5/2+), 93 level as assigned by 1993Ma39 ({+147}Ce |b{+-} decay) and 2015Wa28 ({+252}Cf SF decay). Based on syst one has J|p(g.s.)=(5/2+) for {+145}La (1993Pe07), {+149}Pr (2004Si16) and J|p=7/2+ for {+145}Pr (1993Pe07), {+149}Pm (2004Si16), with 7/2+ most likely excluded by log| {Ift}=6.9 to 3/2-, 315 level of {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay daughter. (5/2+) is also in agreement with shell-model calculations: Nilsson model (|p5/2[413]), and particle-plus-triaxial rotor model (1993Ma39, |b{-2}|?0.17, |g=0|', Fig. 5,6 show 5/2+ as calculated g.s.). As (3/2+) is sustained by stronger arguments (based on measurements) as compared with (5/2+) that results from weaker arguments (syst and calculations), (3/2+) is adopted by the current evaluation. However as neither of (3/2+) and (5/2+) seems to be excluded by {+147}Pr |b{+-} decay to {+147}Nd, (5/2+) should not be excluded without more elaborate future measurements. As a matter of fact (5/2+) was proposed by 1975Pi03 and 1981Ya06, and adopted by 1978Ha22 and 2009Ni02 evaluations, while (3/2+) was preferred by 1992De38 evalution. One can also note that the discovery of the rotational bands by 2015Wa28 in this nucleus rather favors (3/2+) as 2015Wa28 suggest, from which one can get proper J|p's to the intermediary levels leading to (7/2-), 362 and (11/2-), 385 where the bandhead of the first band is, which gives the best match of the low spin and high spin structures. 
T$weighted average of 13.6 min {I5} (1975Do15), 13.3 min {I4} (1981Ya06), and 13.44 min {I10} (2015Ru09, weighted average of 13.34 min {I6} from 78|g, 13.51 min {I7} from 128|g, and 13.98 min {I20} from 1261|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$L=4 in {+148}Nd(t,|a) dataset with (7/2+) assigned by 1990Zy01, and confirmed by 1993Ma39 ({+147}Ce |b{+-} decay) and 2015Wa28 ({+252}Cf SF decay) 
CONF$3/2+[404] from {+148}Nd(t,|a) (1990Zy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J$L=2 in {+148}Nd(t,|a) dataset with (5/2+) assigned by 1990Zy01, and confirmed by 1993Ma39 ({+147}Ce |b{+-} decay) and 2015Wa28 ({+252}Cf SF decay) 
T$from {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay (1981ScZM) 
CONF$1/2+[420] or 3/2+[411] from {+148}Nd(t,|a) (1990Zy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$(3/2+,5/2+) from M1+E2 |g to (3/2+) g.s. and M1 |g to (5/2+), 2.7 level; (3/2+) less likely from |g from (7/2-), 362 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$L=5 in {+148}Nd(t,|a) dataset with (11/2-) assigned by 1990Zy01, and confirmed by 2015Wa28 ({+252}Cf SF decay) 
T$<20 ns from |g|g(t) (2015Wa28) 
CONF$1/2-[550] from {+148}Nd(t,|a) (1990Zy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J$based on actual data the level is not clearly fed by |b{+-} decay from (5/2-) g.s. of the {+147}Ce parent that implies that J|p is likely to be not 3/2,5/2,7/2; (E2) |g to (5/2+) and other |g's to (5/2+), (7/2+), and (7/2-) levels determine (9/2+) as most likely possibility 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J$(9/2+) from M1,E2 |g to (5/2+) and |g from (11/2-), 385, which is marginally compatible with log| {Ift}=7.4 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(5/2-,7/2-) from (E1) |g to (7/2+), 28 level and (E1) |g to (5/2+), 28 level; (5/2-) less likely from |g to (9/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
J$L=2 in {+148}Nd(t,|a) dataset with (5/2)+ assigned by 1990Zy01 
CONF$5/2+[413] or 5/2+[402] from {+148}Nd(t,|a) (1990Zy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2,9/2+) from |g's to (5/2+), 93 and (9/2+), 247 levels respectively; and (3/2,5/2,7/2) from log| {Ift}=6.8 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$L=4 in {+148}Nd(t,|a) dataset with (7/2)+ assigned by 1990Zy01 
CONF$5/2+[413] from {+148}Nd(t,|a) (1990Zy01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2,9/2-) from |g's to (9/2+), 247 and (5/2-), 467 levels respectively; and (3/2,5/2,7/2) from log| {Ift}=6.9 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(7/2-,9/2-) from |g to (5/2-), 467 and |g to (11/2-), 385; (9/2-) discarded by log| {Ift}=7.7 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-,5/2-,7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(3/2-,5/2,7/2-) from |g's to (3/2-), 453 and (7/2-), 608 respectively; (3/2-,5/2-,7/2-) from log| {Ift}=5.8 from (5/2-) g.s. of {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2-) from |g's to (3/2-), 608 and (9/2+), 247 levels respectively; (7/2-) from log| {Ift}=5.4 from (5/2-) g.s. of {+147}Ce |b{+-} decay parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2)
level_comment:
J$(5/2,7/2,9/2+) from |g's to (7/2-), 608 and (7/2+), 28, and (5/2+), 292 levels, respectively; (5/2,7/2) from log| {Ift}=5.90 {I7} from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent (or (5/2-,7/2-) for log| {Ift}<5.90) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2,9/2+) from |g's to (5/2+), 282 and (9/2+), 546 levels, respectively; (7/2-) from log| {Ift}=5.8 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(7/2-,9/2+) from |g's to (5/2+), 93 and (11/2-), 385 levels 292 respectively; (7/2-) from log| {Ift}=5.6 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2) from |g's to (5/2+), 2.7, (5/2-), 701, and (9/2+), 471 levels, respectively; (7/2-) from log| {Ift}=5.8 from (5/2-) g.s. |b{+-} decay of {+147}Ce parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
CONF$|p3/2+[411] ~# |n5/2-[523] ({+148}Pr IT decay) 
T weighted average of: 2.25 min {I8} (1986Wa06), 2.33 min {I5} (1986BuZV), 2.27 min {I4} (1979Ik06), 2.28 min {I5} (1979Ta17), 2.28 min {I9} (1976Ya06). Other: 2.47 min {I13} (1969WiZX). 
J$log| {Ift}=7.2 and 7.0 for |b-transitions to 0+ and 2+ levels in {+148}Pr (2.29) |b{+-} decay, and 121.2|g from |p=- level is M1,E2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
CONF$|p5/2+[413] ~# |n3/2-[532] ({+148}Pr IT decay) 
J$|DJ=3 M3 |g to 1-, g.s. 
T weighted average of 2.0 min {I1} (1979Ik06), 2.02 min {I9} (1986Wa06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.72 via 0+ parent in {+148}Ce |b{+-} decay gives J|p=1+; M1,E2 |g to |p=-, 105 level gives negative parity indicating an inconsistency 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.5 via 0+ parent; 0+ strongly unlikely from level scheme and systematics (as shown by 1983Ar15 in {+148}Ce |b{+-} decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=4.95 via 0+ parent; 0+ strongly unlikely from level scheme and systematics (as shown by 1983Ar15 in {+148}Ce |b{+-} decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.6 via 0+ parent; 0+ strongly unlikely from level scheme and systematics (as shown by 1983Ar15 in {+148}Ce |b{+-} decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$(5/2+,7/2+) is suggested based on shell-model orbitals d{-5/2} or g{-7/2} consistent with systematics of odd Pr isotopes; 5/2+ is suggested by particle-triaxial rotor model (PTRM) calculations (1993Ma39) and by dominant (|?95%) configuration=|p5/2[413] from quasiparticle-rotor model (QPRM) calculations (2010Rz02); observed |b{+-} feedings to 3/2+ levels in {+149}Nd also support 5/2+. However, L(d,{+3}He)=4 suggests 7/2+,9/2+. 
T$weighted average of 2.3 min {I2} (|g(t),1967Va14), 2.25 min {I8} (|g(t),1977Pi06). Others: 2.9 min {I1} (1973Oh08), 2.3 min (1964Ho03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E1 |g to (5/2+); possible bandhead 
T$from weighted average of 26 ns {I4} (2010Rz02,|g|g(t) in {+252}Cf SF) and 22.9 ns {I18} (1974ClZX, (fragment-fragment)(x ray)|g(t) in {+248}Cm,{+252}Cf SF). Others: 7.2 ns {I6} (2014Ko27, |g|g(t) in {+149}Ce |b{+-}), 9.7 ns {I21} (1996YaZV, |b|g(t) in |b{+-}, two authors are the same as in 2014Ko27); in severe disagreement with the values from SF decays. Reason for the discrepancy is not clear, if it is assumed that the same 58-keV |g ray is involved in the SF decays and in {+149}Ce |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1 |g to (5/2+); band member 
T$from |g|g(t) in |b{+-} decay (2014Ko27). Other: 4.2 ns {I21} (|b|g-coin in |b{+-},1996YaZV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (7/2-); band based on this level interpreted as possible octupole band as the transitions (implied as E1) connect this band to band 1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$(fragment)(fragment)(x-ray)|g(t) (1974ClZX). Other: 26 ns {I4} from |g|g(t) (2010Rz02) in {+252}Cf SF decay. See also the Adopted Levels, where the T{-1/2} values from {+149}Ce |b{+-} decay, shorter by a factor of |?3 from those in SF decays are discussed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L=4 inconsistent with J|p=(5/2+) from log| {Ift} values to 1/2- and 3/2- states in {+149}Nd (see {+149}Ce |b{+-} decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from weighted average of 7.2 ns {I6} (2014Ko27, average of 7.2 ns {I8} from (105|g)(58|g)(t) and 7.2 ns {I10} from (173|g)(58|g)(t)); and 9.7 ns {I21} (1996YaZV, |b|g(t)). Note that the value in the Adopted Levels is 23.4 ns {I18} from SF decays (2010Rz02, 1974ClZX). Reason for the discrepancy is not clear, if the same 58.2-keV transition is involved in SF decays and |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) (2010Rz02) in {+252}Cf SF decay. Other: 22.9 ns {I18} from 1974ClZX using (fragment)(fragment)(x-ray)|g(t) in {+248}Cm, SF decay. See also the Adopted Levels, where the T{-1/2} values from {+149}Ce |b{+-} decay, shorter by a factor of |?3 from those in SF decays are discussed. 
$Dominant configuration=|p1/2[550] from QRPM calculations (2010Rz02); the levels of this band mix with |p3/2[541] orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 1970Wa37, other: 6~s~{I1} (1978Ya08), 9.1~s~{I4} (1974Ar17) 
J$from |b{+-} decay to 0+ and 2+ states in {+150}Nd (1986Fo05). Parity is fixed from allowed |b{+-}decay of {+150}Ce (log| {Ift} < 4.9) to 110~keV level in {+150}Pr which decays by an E1 transition. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from {+150}Pr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (April 2013 update) 
$Based on Nilsson configurations for neighboring odd-A nuclides, 2015Ko23 propose the following configurations for the g.s.: |p5/2[413]~#|n3/2[521] or |p5/2[413]~#|n3/2[532], the former favored by Gallagher-Moszkowski rules. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$2015Ko23 quote value from K. Yamauchi, Y. Kojima, H. Sakane, et al., Proc. Specialist Research Meet. Scientific and Engineering Researchers of Unstable Nuclei and on Their Nuclear Methodology (KURRI-Kr-3), 1996, p51 (reference 6 in 2015Ko23). According to e-mail reply of Jan 11, 2018, from Y. Kojima, one of the authors of the 1996 report, value of 67 ns {I3} given in the 1996 report is mean lifetime. Note that this half-life for the 110-keV level is missing in {+150}Pr Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (April 2013 update). 
$Strong |b transition to 109.8 level is identified by 2015Ko23 as an allowed unhindered |b-transitions, and a spin-flip transition between the |n3/2[532] and |p5/2[532] orbitals. Proposed Nilsson configuration=|p5/2[532]~#|n3/2[532] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from fit to K-ce(t) of 130|g in {+150}Nd. Fit uses the Bateman equation to include growth from the {+150}Ce parent, incorporating the {+150}Ce half-life from literature and the {+252}Cf fission yields from the ENDF library (2024Lo03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) in {+151}Pr |b{+-} (1990An31). Others: 22.4~s~{I15} (1978PiZQ), 15~s~{I6} (1987MaZY), 4.0~s~{I7} (1970WiZN). 1987MaZY suggest that 4.0-s activity (1970WiZN) is from {+152}Pr. 
J$probable allowed or first forbidden |b{+-} decay to (1/2)-, (3/2)- and (5/2)- levels in {+151}Nd. Negative parity is suggested by Nilsson model assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$ |g to (3/2-) from a long-lived level makes E1, M1 and E2 less likely 
T$estimate from ratio of |b|g coin events/singles events (2006Ko25) in {+151}Ce decay (1.76~s) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$ from 35.1|g(A=151)(t) (2012Ma13) 
$ Isomeric yield=19% {I12} (2012Ma13) 
$ Configuration=|p1/2[420] or |p3/2[422] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 3.7~s~{I2} (1990An31), 3.8~s~{I2} (1985Br08, also reported in 1988Ka14), and 3.24~s~{I19} (1983Hi05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$(3/2-) can be tentatively quoted from systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by evaluator) 
T$weighted average of 4.28 s {I11} (1990An31, 1988GrZY, from |g(t) and I(K| x ray)(t)) and 4.68 s {I60} (2017Wu04, from implanted ion-|b{+-}-t, implanted ions-|g-t correlations, implanted ion-|b{+-}-|g-t); others values: 4.2 s (1987An03) and 4.3 s {I2} (1987Gr12). (Refs. 1990An31, 1988GrZY, 1987An03, and 1987Gr12 are from the same group.) 
CONF$|p3/2[541] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E$ x=20 (from {+248}Cm) and x=37 (from {+252}Cf), from particle-rotor model calculations for 3/2[541] band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$Suggested by 1996To05 based on proposed Nilsson configuration |p3/2[541]~#|n3/2[521] 
J$1996To05 suggest log| {Ift} values of|?5.8 and|?6.4 for the |b{+-} transitions to the first 2+ and 4+ levels, respectively, in {+154}Nd. This would indicate J{+|p}=3+ for the {+154}Pr g.s. however, a more complete decay scheme, with more reliable intensity balances, is needed before a firm conclusion can be drawn. REJECYED BY F KONDEV: This is DK=3 forbiddenn transition and I'd expect log ft ~8-10 
T$weighted average of 2.3 s {I1} (from I|g(t) and Ix(t) (1988Ka16, 1990Ok04, 1996To05)) and 2.29 s {I20} (2017Wu04) 
%B-$assumed to be 100%, since other decay modes seem to be unlikely 
CONF$From systematics of well-deformed nuclei in this mass region, the |p3/2[541] and |n3/2[521] Nilsson orbitals are expected near the proton and neutron Fermi surfaces, respectively. Thus, using the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule, one may expect the K|p=3+, |p3/2[541]~#|n3/2[521] configuration for the ground state. The existence of a K|p=0+ isomer, arising from the same configuration, is also possible. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$(3/2-) is predictible from systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration. (By the evaluator Filip G. Kondev) 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|p3/2[541] Nilsson orbital, tentatively expected based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei. (By the evaluator Filip G. Kondev) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. The assignment to the ground state is ambiguous, given the possible existence of an isomeric state. 
CONF$From systematics of well-deformed nuclei in this mass region, the |p3/2[541] and |n5/2[523] Nilsson orbitals are expected near the proton and neutron Fermi surfaces, respectively. Thus, using the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule, one may expect the K|p=1+, |p3/2[541]~#|n5/2[523] configuration for the ground state. The existence of a K|p=4+ isomer, arising from the same configuration, is also possible. The assignment is made by the evaluator. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=142 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.7, %|b{+-}2n=0.0, (2003Mo09: Phys. Rev. C67, 055802) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=577 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.9, %|b{+-}2n=0.2, (2016Ma12: Phys. Rev. C93, 025805) 
$A total of 365,000 counts were assigned to {+156}Pr for spectrometer setting on Pr, and 23,700 counts for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=1.040 |mb {I3} for Pr setting and 0.353 |mb {I2} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
T$from 2017Wu04 (at RIBF-RIKEN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|p3/2[541] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=160 ms, %|b{+-}n=8.8 (2003Mo09: Phys. Rev. C67, 055802) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=404 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.6 (2016Ma12: Phys. Rev. C93, 025805) 
$A total of 75,700 counts were assigned to {+157}Pr for spectrometer setting on Pr, and 10,800 counts for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=133.9 nb {I8} for Pr setting and 47.5 nb {I5} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
T$from 2017Wu04 (at RIBF-RIKEN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. The assignment to the ground state is ambiguous, given the possible existence of an isomeric state. 
CONF$From systematics of well-deformed nuclei in this mass region, the |p3/2[541] and |n7/2[633] Nilsson orbitals are expected near the proton and neutron Fermi surfaces, respectively. Thus, using the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule, one may expect the K|p=5-, |p3/2[541]~#|n7/2[6333] configuration for the ground state. The existence of a K|p=2- isomer, arising from the same configuration, is also possible. The assignment is made by the evaluator. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=121 ms, %|b{+-}n=11.8, %|b{+-}2n=0.0 (2003Mo09: Phys. Rev. C67, 055802) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=287 ms, %|b{+-}n=3.7, %|b{+-}2n=0.2 (2016Ma12: Phys. Rev. C93, 025805) 
$A total of 6100 counts were assigned to {+158}Pr for spectrometer setting on Pr, and 773 counts for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=7.38 nb {I16} for Pr setting and 1.84 nb {I7} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
T$from 2017Wu04 (at RIBF-RIKEN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%B-$only the |b{+-} decay mode has been observed and expected, followed by possible delayed neutron decay. The |b{+-}2n decay mode is unlikely from Q(|b{+-})2n=-418 {I400}. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=94.9 ms, %|b{+-}n=22, %|b{+-}2n=0.0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=203.5 ms, %|b{+-}n=21.4, 13.2; %|b{+-}2n=0 (2021Mi17, two values of %|b{+-}n for different fission barriers) 
$A total of 653 counts were assigned to {+159}Pr for spectrometer setting on Pr, and 119 counts for setting on Gd (2018Fu08) 
$Production |s=0.68 nb {I4} for Pr setting and 0.22 nb {I2} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity of {+159}Pr 
J$tentative (3/2-) from |p3/2[541] orbital, based on systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei, as proposed in the 2017 update of {+159}Pr nuclide, and in 2021Ko07. Also, |W{-p}=3/2- in 2019Mo01. 
T$from 2017Wu04, using a fit to the (implanted ions)|b{+-} correlated decay curve using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods, including contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. Predicted %|b{+-}n=25 (2019Mo01) 
E$ the observed {+160}Pr fragments may include both g.s. and isomeric decays 
J$(1+) can be assigned from the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). However the assignment is very tentative and not adopted in the data field 
J$Assign by F.G. Kondev 
T$ from 2017Wu04 (from supplemental material available on line); may correspond to admixture of g.s. and isomeric decays (by fit of the time distribution of electrons detected after the implantation of an ion, correlated to them in position and time employing the least-squared and unbinned maximum likelihood methods in a parallel analysis that included contributions from the methods in decays of parent, daughters, granddaughters, as well as a constant background) 
CONF$From systematics of well-deformed nuclei in this mass region, the |p3/2[541] and |n1/2[521] Nilsson orbitals are expected near the proton and neutron Fermi surfaces, respectively. Thus, using the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule, one may expect the K|p=1+, |p3/2[541]~#|n1/2[521] configuration for the ground state. The assignment is made by the evaluator. 
CONF$Assigned by F.G. Kondev 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=65.4 ms, %|b{+-}n=42 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=108.6 ms, %|b{+-}n=38.5 (2016Ma12) 
$A total of four counts were assigned to {+161}Pr for spectrometer setting on Pr, and none for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=6.7 pb {I+65-37} for Pr setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s value (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
J$3/2- from |W{-|p}=3/2- orbital proposed in 2019Mo01 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight of 550 ns given in 2018Fu08. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical values of 65.4 ms (2019Mo01) and 108.6 ms (2016Ma12). From a general decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number, T{-1/2} for {+161}Pr is expected to be <0.2 s, based on measured half-lives of 181 ms for {+158}Pr, 0.13 s for {+159}Pr, and 0.17 s {I14} for {+160}Pr, available in literature. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$From 2005Xu04. 1999Xu05 report 0.60 {I15} s from decay curve of 142|g in coin with 2.5-5.5 MeV protons. The 142|g and 306|g from levels in {+124}Ce were observed (1999Xu05) from the delayed proton decay of {+125}Nd 
J$From 1999Xu05. Other: 5/2+ (syst,1997Mo25). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=GE
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
Delayed proton precursor; the proton energy distribution is from 2.2 to 6.0 MeV. The average energy is 3.7 MeV. Coincidence with x-rays (1983Ni05,1986Wi15,1987WiZM) 
T$From proton multiscaling (1987WiZM); value is that proposed by 1987WiZM as a weighted av from all available data with the isotope separator OASIS. The value seems to include reported values of 1.9 s {I4} (1983Ni05) and 1.5 s {I3} (1986Wi15) (evaluator). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$No evidence of |b-delayed proton emission was reported in 1985Wi07 
T$tentative value from 2012Au07. Deduced from systematic trend in neighboring nuclides 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 7 s {I1} (1997Gi07) and 6.7 s {I4} (weighted average of 4 measurements in 2010Xu12); both from decay curves of |g rays. Others: 4.9 s {I2} (1985Wi07), 5.9 s {I6} (1977Bo02), both from decay curve of delayed protons 
$Half-life of 6 s {I2} from 1993GeZZ (also 1992GeZZ) is superseded by the value from 1997Gi07 
J$from statistical model prediction (1985Wi07). 7/2- proposed in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25); 5/2+ from systematics in 2012Au07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$possible configuration=1/2[411] 
T$from decay curves for 134.0|g and 399.0|g (2010Xu12); 134|g and 399|g seen in coincidence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
T$authors estimate the half-life is a few tens of ns from observations of the de-exciting 108|g and 69|g in delayed coincidence. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_comment:
T$authors estimate the half-life is between several ns and tens of ns based on analysis of Weisskopf hindrance factor of deexciting transitions in comparison with systematics. 
$Configuration=|n7/2-[523]~#|p(5/2+[413]5/2-[532]) (2023Pe11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from 2000Xu08, timing of intense |g rays from {+130}Nd decay. Other: 28 s {I3} (1977Bo02,timing of |b{++} and x rays) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Delayed proton emitter; E(p)=1.7 to 6.4 MeV (1986Wi15). Other: 1977Bo02 
J$from statistical model calculations of the final state feedings in {+130}Ce (1986Wi15) 
T$weighted average of 26.6 s {I17} (1999Ga41), 25.0 s {I12} (1983ViZU, 1993Al03), 25 s {I4} (1986Wi15), 24 s {I3}(1977Bo02); 
Other: T{-1/2}=33 s {I3}(1996Ge12) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
T$from 1990JaZU 
J$(E1) |g to (5/2+) g.s.; J|p assignments of this band were made on systematics of N=71 nuclei and in-band properties 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|D<r{+2}>({+132}Nd-{+143}Nd)=-0.072 fm{+2} {I27} (1992Le09) 
T$weighted average of 105 s {I10}(1977Bo02) and 88 s {I7}(1995Bu11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 0+ 
T$from 1995Ma96 in {+105}Ag({+32}S,|ap2n|g) reaction. Others: 186 ps {I13} (1989Mo10), 243 ps {I21} (1987Wa02), 220 ps {I20} (1986Ma39). 2001Ra27 adopt 166 ps {I28} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2, E2 |g to 2+ 
T$others: 7.6 ps {I14} (1995Ma96), 12.1 ps {I5} (1987Wa02), <28 ps (1989Mo10), <21 ps (1986Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ from recoil-distance method (1995Ma96). Others: 243 ps {I21} (1987Wa02), 220 ps {I20} (1986Ma39) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this level is suspect. The 592 transition is placed from 2226 level in adopted levels, gammas; based on results from 1997Pe27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$corresponding level is at 2692 in adopted levels. The 565-466-522 cascade is reordered as 565-466-1092-522 in adopted levels, gammas; based on results from 1988Wa01 and 1997Pe27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$corresponding level is at 3257 in adopted levels. The 565-466-522 cascade is reordered as 565-466-1092-522 in adopted levels, gammas; based on results from 1988Wa01 and 1997Pe27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15-)
level_comment:
E$reordering of the 741-764-764 cascade from 6433 level as 764-764-741 by 1997Pe27 defines this level at 4906 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17-)
level_comment:
E$reordering of the 741-764-764 cascade from 6433 level as 764-764-741 by 1997Pe27 defines this level at 5670 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E$corresponds to 6163 level in adopted levels 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J+2
level_comment:
E$corresponds to 6994 level in adopted levels. This level is fed by an 856 transition (not reported by 1996Jo13) from a 7850 level in adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from direct feeding of 5/2+, 7/2+ states in {+133}Pr, following %|e+%|b{++} decay; systematics of structures in neighboring N=73 isotones 
T$from 1977Bo02 
CONF$|n7/2[404] (g{-7/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$127.9|g M3 to (7/2+) 
T$Value quoted in 1995Br21 ({+133}Pm |e decay), but a direct evidence was not presented 
CONF$Admixture between |n1/2[400] (s{-1/2}) and 1/2[411] (d{-3/2}) orbitals. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$176.1|g E1 to (7/2+) 
T$From 176.1|g(t) in 1998Ba81. Other: >100 ns (1995Br21) 
CONF$|n9/2[514] (h{-11/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$180.6|g E1 to (3/2+), 62.3|g to (5/2+) 
T$from 180.6|g(t) in 1995Br21. Other: >50 ns (1994Ba25) 
CONF$|n1/2[541] (h{-9/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (41/2+)
level_comment:
MOMM1$from g=0.31 {I8} (1995Me08) using transient magnetic field technique in coincidence mode with the GASP array 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$ from recoil-|g time distribution (2012Ta18). Previous value: 301 ns {I18} in Adopted dataset for {+133}Nd in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
|m: from perturbed angular distribution; recalculated for consistency with {+146}Nd standard (1989Ra17) 
J$E2 |g to 0+, band member 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
g: authors' value revised to +0.62 {I18} by 1989Ra17 for consistency with reference standard. 
T$weighted average of 65.4 ps {I21} (1999Kl11), 64 ps {I4} (1987Bi13) and 55 ps {I7} (1995Ma96). Other: 104 ps {I9} (1987Wa02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from 1999Kl11. Other: 4.9 ps {I5} (1995Kr08), 4.2 ps {I8} (1995Ma96), |<3.5 ps (1987Bi13), 11.1 ps {I14} (1987Wa02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$166.5|g E1 to 8-, 873.1|g (M2+E3) to 6+ and systematics of known isomers in N=74 isotones 
T$From 2017Pe03. Others: 410 |ms (1972Pa26), 500 |ms {I100} (1969WaZX) 
CONF$K|p=8-, |n{+2}(7/2[404],9/2[514]) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$ (<r{+2}>){+1/2}=4.908 fm {I4} (2004An14, evaluation) 
MOMM1,MOME2$ from resonance ionization spectroscopy (1992Le09 (also 1988Al41,1987Al25)). 1989Ra17 quote Q=+2.05 {I41} from 1988Al41. See also 2005St24 compilation 
$ |D<r{+2}>({+142}Nd-{+135}Nd)=-0.04 fm{+2} {i3} (1988Al41) 
$ 2007Ii03: analyzed r<{+2}> values. 
J$ spin from atomic beam (1972Ek04), parity from consistency of measured |m with |n9/2[504] configuration 
T$from 1975Wi11. Others: 12 min (1968BrZX), 15 min {i1} (1971ArYY), 12 min {i1} (1973VaYZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ? ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%IT$from B(M4)(W.u.)<30 (RUL) 
E,T,J$while the existence of a level at 65 keV is fairly certain, evidence for its association with a 5.5 min {i5} activity (reported by 1970Ab07 in spallation reaction) is lacking since no data are available for its decay by |e, |b{++} or isomer decay. From systematics, it was assumed (1989Ko07,1989Vi04) that the 5.5 min activity corresponds to the 65 level of expected J|p=(1/2+). The half-life was measured (1970Ab07) by growth and decline of intensity of 296|g from the decay of daughter activity of {+135}Pr produced from the neodymium fraction. A similar T{-1/2}=6 min {i1} was measured (1970Ab07) from the decay of 266|g from {+135}Ce decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$ integral perturbed angular distribution method after ion implantation (IMPAD) (1987Bi13). See also 2005St24 compilation 
$ Configuration=|n9/2[514] from h{-11/2} orbital (1987Bi13) 
J$|DJ=1 |g to 9/2(-) 
T$from RDDS in (HI,xn|g). Average of 42 ps 5 (1999Kl11) and 35 ps 5 (1987Bi13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Population uncertain in (HI,xn|g) since only the 978.2|g is reported in this study, not the 463.8|g and 1176.7|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2-)
level_comment:
J$possible |g's to (21/2-) and (23/2-) 
E$ordering of 121-444 cascade is from 1987Be57. 1987Pi05 show reverse ordering, defining a level at 2496 instead of 2820 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, M1 |g to (23/2+); |DJ=2, (E2) |g's to (21/2+) 
J$from 1995De40 and 1987Be57 
Q(intrinsic)=1.4 {i4} (1993Wi09). Q deduced from T{-1/2} of 620|g which connects the SD band to normal states 
Transitions to normal states are from 1995De40 (see also 1987Be57 and 1993Wi09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ from RDDS (1999Kl11). Other: 4.2 ps {i14} (1987Bi13) estimated from |d(199|g) and relative feeder intensities from 560 and 793 levels in the analysis of RDDS data for 199 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$ from RDDS (1999Kl11). Other:4.2 ps {i14} (1987Bi13) estimated from |d(199|g) and relative feeder intensities from 560 and 793 levels in the analysis of RDDS data for 199 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
Population seems uncertain here since other two strong |g rays at 463.8 and 1176.7 seen in {+135}Pm |e decay are not reported here 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2-)
level_comment:
E$ordering of 121-444 cascade is from 1987Be57 and 2003Zh25. 1987Pi05 show reverse ordering, defining a level at 2496 instead of 2820 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (25/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from 1995De40 and 1987Be57 
Q(intrinsic)=1.4 {i4} (1993Wi09). Q deduced from T{-1/2} of 620|g which connects the SD band to normal states 
Transitions to normal states are from 1995De40 (see also 1987Be57 and 1993Wi09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (45/2-)
level_comment:
E$6813 level (532|g and 1026|g from this level) in 1987Be57 is probably the same as 6799 level from 2003Zh25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(361.7|g, out)/B(E2)(560.5|g, in)=1.29 {I64} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(361.7|g, out)/B(E2)(560.5|g, in)=0.36 {I18} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(232.6|g, out)/B(E2)(594.3|g, in)=0.82 {I25} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(232.6|g, out)/B(E2)(594.3|g, in)=0.14 {I4} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(476.7|g, out)/B(E2)(709.5|g, in)=0.66 {I29} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(476.7|g, out)/B(E2)(709.5|g, in)=0.07 {I3} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(618.1|g, out)/B(E2)(694.3|g, in)=0.28 {I7} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(618.1|g, out)/B(E2)(694.3|g, in)=0.11 {I3} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(250.6|g, out)/B(E2)(727.3|g, in)=0.68 {I32} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(250.6|g, out)/B(E2)(727.3|g, in)=0.56 {I26} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(566.2|g, out)/B(E2)(708.9|g, in)=0.24 {I10} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(566.2|g, out)/B(E2)(708.9|g, in)=0.12 {I4} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(560.9|g, out)/B(E2)(670.1|g, in)=0.18 {I11} (2020LvAA) 
$B(E2)(560.9|g, out)/B(E2)(670.1|g, in)=0.02 {I1} (2020LvAA) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(361.7|g, out)/B(E2)(560.5|g, in)=1.3 {I12} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(361.7|g, out)/B(E2)(560.5|g, in)=0.36 {I32} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(232.6|g, out)/B(E2)(594.3|g, in)=0.82 {I43} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(232.6|g, out)/B(E2)(594.3|g, in)=0.14 {I7} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(476.7|g, out)/B(E2)(709.5|g, in)=0.66 {I52} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(476.7|g, out)/B(E2)(709.5|g, in)=0.07 {I6} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(618.1|g, out)/B(E2)(694.3|g, in)=0.28 {I10} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(618.1|g, out)/B(E2)(694.3|g, in)=0.11 {I4} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(250.6|g, out)/B(E2)(727.3|g, in)=0.68 {I57} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(250.6|g, out)/B(E2)(727.3|g, in)=0.56 {I47} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(566.2|g, out)/B(E2)(708.9|g, in)=0.24 {I14} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(566.2|g, out)/B(E2)(708.9|g, in)=0.12 {I7} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2-
level_comment:
$B(M1)(560.7|g, out)/B(E2)(670.1|g, in)=0.18 {I17} (2021Lv01) 
$B(E2)(560.7|g, out)/B(E2)(670.1|g, in)=0.02 {I2} (2021Lv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from 1975Br16 (average of 109|g(t), ce(109|g)(t), and {+136}Pr 552|g+540|g(t)). Other: 55.0 min {I15} (1968Zh04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$effective half-life. Note that <20 ps is given in Figure 1, and <14 ps in Table 1, which differ by ln(2). Compiler assumes the latter corresponds to T{-1/2} and the former to the mean lifetime. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from 1973Bu18. Others: 40 min {I2} (1968Zh01), 47.8 min {I9} (1975MaXE) 
J$atomic beam (1976Fu06), log| {Ift}=5.9 to 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$J|p=9/2- assigned in 1975No08 based on 690|g(M2) to 5/2+, 457|g([M1,E2]) to 11/2-, and log ft |?6.7 from 11/2- for |b{+-} intensity deduced from |g-ray transition intensity balance. However, I|g(457)/I|g(690)=1.45(5) is not consistent with Weisskopf half-life estimates of |?1 ps for 457|g, and |?10 ns for 690|g. Also, evaluators have determined from |g-ray transition intensity balance no |b{+-} feeding to this level. Thus, the J|p=9/2- assignment is questionable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (39/2-)
level_comment:
$additional weak decay out pathways from this level are suggested by observation of 876|g in Band 3 and 396|g from the triaxial band observed in gated spectra, however, exact depopulating transitions were not identified. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$from 1970Ho28. Others: 5.2 h {I1} (1966Gr15), 5.7 h {I3} (1971Ju01) 
$Evaluated nuclear charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.912 fm {I3} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
E$1994De11 in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) assign this level as the 4+ member of the |g band, while 2013Li24 in {+124}Te({+19}F,p4n|g) assign a level at 1843 as the 4+ member and extend this band. Placements by 2013Li24 is adopted. Note that 2013Li24 also report the 1843 level and assign it as the band head of a new band. 
J$829.0|g Q (probable E2) to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
J$810.3|g Q to (3)+, 1011.6|g D+Q to 4+ 
J$(2+,3+,4+) in previous evaluation based on 810.3|g (M1) to (3)+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_comment:
J$659.0|g D to 7-. Note that 2012Pe15 in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) propose 8- while 1994De11 in {+123}Sb({+19}F,4n|g) give 8+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$66.6|g E2 to 8+, band structure 
T$from 2013Va10 in {+96}Zr({+48}Ca,6n|g). Other: 0.41 |ms {I5} from 1975Yo01 in {+140}Ce(|a,6n|g),{+141}Pr(p,4n|g) data set 
MOMM1$from 1982Ri09 by TDPAD 
$Configuration=|nh{-11/2}{+-2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_comment:
J$proposed in {+94}Zr({+48}Ca,4n|g) as band head; 532.1|g D+Q to (14+), 537.3|g D+Q to (13), 1323.7|g to (12+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
$Configuration=(|n h{-11/2}){+-2}{-10+} 
T$from 1975Yo01, using |g(t) following timing with beam pulses 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$ RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.9076 fm {I25} (2013An02 evaluation) 
J$spin from ABMR (1972Ek04); |p from log| {Ift}=5.2 to 5/2+. 
T$from 1967La19. 
MOMM1,MOME2$laser resonance ionization mass spectroscopy (1992Le09, also 1988Al41); Q is Sternheimer corrected. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$spin from ABMR (1972Ek04); |p from M4 |g to 3/2+. 
T$from 1951St03 (ion chem; |b, G-M counter). Others: 5.5 h (1961Bo19), 5.5 h {I5} (1963Ko20,1964Gr32) 
%EC+%B+,%IT$deduced by evaluators from measured I|g and I(ceK) of 231|g and I|g, I(ceK) data of |g rays from |e+|b{++} decay to {+139}Pr. See comments for branching ratio normalization in {+139}Nd IT decay and in {+139}Nd |e decay datasets 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (15/2+)
level_comment:
J$|p=+ in 2011Bh07. |p=(-) suggested in 2007Ku12. |DJ=2 Q 1713|g to 11/2- favors negative parity, but note that this |g was not seen in 2011Bh07. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2-)
level_comment:
J$2007Ku12 assigned |p=- from mult=E1 for 474.6|g from 2721, (19/2+) level in linear polarization measurement. 2008Xu05 also assigned negative parity. 2011Bh07 and 2008Fe02 assigned positive parity. For the 2721 level, all studies assigned 19/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 278 ns {I2} (605|g(t),2013Va10) and 272 ns {I4} (off-beam 665|g(t) in (|a,5n|g)). Other: >141 ns (1977Lu04) 
$Configuration=|nh{-11/2}{+-2}~#|nd{-3/2}{+-1} (2013Va10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J1 AP (51/2)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$estimated by 2011Bh07 from the decay out of the band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J2 AP (49/2,53/2)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,J$this level decays through a |DJ=1, 388|g to the (47/2) level of a band similar to Band #3 and #4 in {+137}Nd (See 1997Pe06). J=49/2 assigned by 2000Pe01. A spin value larger by 2 may be possible if there are possible unobserved transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_spin_parity: J3 GE (49/2)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level decays through a 1122|g-1033|g cascade of |DJ=2, E2 transitions to a dipole band, similar to Band #7 in {+137}Nd (See 1997Pe06). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (49/2,53/2)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E,J$this level decays through a |DJ=1, 388|g to the (47/2) level of a band similar to Band #3 and #4 in {+137}Nd (See 1997Pe06). J=49/2 assigned by 2000Pe01. A spin value larger by 2 may be possible if there are unobserved transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$only the transitions below the 2572, 19/2+ level are delayed (2008Fe02). The authors could observe neither any delayed transition populating the 2572, 19/2+ level nor K x-rays of Nd. 
T$apparent half-life from 1071|g(t) (2008Fe02). The 605-keV transition from 2572 level and 665-keV transition from 896 level were also delayed, but the statistics in 2008Fe02 experiment were not adequate for lifetime determination. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$T{-1/2} and decay modes from Adopted Levels 
$Configuration=|nh{-11/2}{+-1}~#(0+ of even-even core) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x>4 MeV from possible feeding of 3963, 29/2+ level according to level scheme shown by 2008Xu05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2
level_comment:
J$17/2(-) in figure 1 of 2007Ku12, 17/2 in authors' table I, the latter should be the assignment according to e-mail reply of Aug 8, 2007 from R. Palit. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (31/2)
level_comment:
J$ (29/2) in figure 1 of 2007Ku12, (31/2-) in authors' table I. According to e-mail reply of Aug 8, 2007 from R. Palit J|p should be (31/2). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (35/2)
level_comment:
J$(31/2) in figure 1 of 2007Ku12, (35/2-) in authors' table I. According to e-mail reply of Aug 8, 2007 from one of the authors, J|p should be (35/2). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (39/2)
level_comment:
J$ (39/2) in figure 1 of 2007Ku12, (39/2+) in authors' table I. According to e-mail reply of Aug 8, 2007 from one of the authors, J|p should be (39/2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J |g to 0+ is E2 
BE2$weighted average (by evaluator) of BE2|^=0.74 {I8} and 0.71 {I8} with {+48}Ti and {+64}Zn targets, respectively. 2013Ba38 (Coulomb excitation dataset) list BE2|^=0.72 {I5} 
T$deduced by evaluator from BE2|^=0.725 {I56} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from (p,t) E=35.6 MeV measured d|s/d|W and DWBA calculations 
T$effective T{-1/2} from DSAM (2010Gl05, {+140}Ce({+3}He,3n|g) dataset) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T from IT decay data (1962Re04) 
J$|g to 4+ is E3; also from (p,t) E=35.6 MeV, measured d|s/d|W and DWBA calculations. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$from (p,t) E=35.6 MeV measured d|s/d|W and DWBA calculations; log| {Ift}=6.1 via 1+ parent, M1+E2 |g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$0+,1+,2+ from log| {Ift}=5.6 via 1+ parent; (0+) from measured d|s/d|W and DWBA calculation in (p,t) E=35.6 MeV; E2 |g to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$0,1,2 from log| {Ift}=6.4 via 1+ parent; (2+,4+) supported by |g|g(|q) for 1837-774 cascade; (2+) from |g to 0+ g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+,7-)
level_comment:
J$(7-) from 7,8,9 from log| {Ift}=7.2 via 8- parent and (5-,6,7-) from |g's to 5- and 7-; (6+) from measured d|s/d|W and DWBA calculation in (p,t) E=35.6 MeV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured: 22 ns {I1} (1981Me09), 32 ns {I1} (1980Me11), 25 ns {I8} (1987Gu22), 32.9 ns {I18} (2006Pe25). The first value of 1980Me11 (32 ns) was subsequently corrected by 1981Me09 (22 ns) but reproduced by 2006Pe25 (33 ns). Adopted is the average of extreme values. 
MOMM1$based on 1980Me11, by time dependent perturbed angular distribution method; other: -1.64 {I22} (1982KaZO) 
J |g to 9- is |DJ=1, E1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 16+
level_comment:
J$|g from 18+ is E2; 16- in 2005Pe24 and 2006Pe25 based on M1+E2 |g to 15-; 2006Pe25 argue as possible the assignment 16+ (not excluded by DCO value), finally adopted by 2013Le22 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (18+)
level_comment:
J$assigned by 2006Pe25 ({+18}O,4n|g) by selection from possible J|p values 19-, 18-, 19+, 18+ based on internal conversion of 37|g and T{-1/2}(7435) arguments 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (20+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$|g from 21- is (E1) and |g's to 17-, 18- and (18+). 2006Pe25 ({+18}O,4n|g) argue that based on single-particle Weisskopf estimates for lifetime the best match is (20+) 
T$ from |g(t), sum of time spectra of 120|g, 182|g, 188|g and 258|g in 2008Fe02 ({+18}O,4n|g). Same result, 1.2 |ms {I1}, is reported by 2013Va10 from |g(t), 229, 258, 343, 433, 991, 1352, 1442, 1497 |g rays studied for half-life measurement ({+48}Ca,4n|g). Other: >400 ns (from time spectrum of 227.5|g (2006Pe25)). 
$ Configuration=|p[d{-5/2}g{-7/2}{+-4}(10+)]~#|n[h{-11/2}{+-2}(10+)] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27-)
level_comment:
J$(E1) |g from 26+ and consistent with fully aligned state of configuration=|ph{-11/2}{+1}~#|nh{-11/2}{+-2} according with shell model calculations (2015Pe10 in ({+48}Ca,4n|g); however cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky (CNS) model calculations suggest that this is the configuration of band D3) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E$ possible one-phonon mixed-symmetry state, strongly mixed with fully-symmetric neighboring 2+ state (2009Wi18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 20+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$ |g(t) (2013Va10), 229, 258, 343, 433, 991, 1352, 1442, 1497 |g rays studied for half-life measurement 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 27(-)
level_comment:
$From 2015Pe10 from shell model calculations, this state is consistent with fully aligned state of configuration=|ph{-11/2}{+1}~#|nh{-11/2}{+-2}. The cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky (CNS) model calculations, however, suggest that this is the configuration of band D3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$measured: 22 ns {I1} (1981Me09), 32 ns {I1} (1980Me11), 25 ns {I8} (1987Gu22), 32.9 ns {I18} (2006Pe25). The first value of 1980Me11 (32 ns) was subsequently corrected by 1981Me09 (22 ns) but reproduced by 2006Pe25 (33 ns). Adopted is the average of extreme values. 
G Other: -0.164 {I22} (1982KaZO) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 20+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$ from |g(t), sum of time spectra of 120|g, 182|g, 188|g and 258|g (2008Fe02). Other: >400 ns (from time spectrum of 227.5|g (2006Pe25)). 
$ Configuration=|p[d{-5/2}g{-7/2}{+-4}{-10+}]~#|n[h{-11/2}{+-2}{-10+}] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$ Lower limit of B(M1) value suggests the 2140 level as fragment of one-phonon mixed-symmetry state. Data are inconclusive whether this state exhausts the total M1 strength 
T$ from DSAM (2010Gl05), effective half-life 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$ Lifetime determination could not be made for this level. The 1559|g from this level can barely be observed at forward angles with a small centroid shift of -0.9 keV {I4} estimated at backward angles. This suggests a fast M1 decay for 2332-keV level. However the data are too poor to be conclusive 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E,J$from Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
BE2$weighted average of BE2|^=0.74 {I8} and 0.71 {I8} with {+48}Ti and {+64}Zn targets, respectively. 2013Ba38 list BE2|^=0.72 {I5} 
T$deduced by evaluator from BE2|^=0.725 {I56} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
MOMM1$by laser resonance ionization mass spectroscopy 
MOME2$by resonance cell laser spectroscopy 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), L=2 in (p,d), (d,t) 
T weighted average of 2.50 h {I8} (1970Bo22), 2.60 h {I12} (1968La17), 2.42 h {I9} (1966Gr05), 2.62 h {I17} (1963Bi19), 2.54 h {I5} (1961Ra06), 2.42 h {I5} (1949Wi02) 
Measured isotope shift, deduced |D<r{+2}> (1992Le09) 
$Configuration=|nd{-3/2} in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from {+141}Pm |e decay (1970Ch29) 
J L=0 in (p,d), (d,t) 
$Configuration=|ns{-1/2} in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
%|e+|b{++}<0.05 (1988Ch39); other: 0.032% {I8} (1970Ab05) 
T weighted average: 63.9 s {I11} (1960Ja06), 61 s {I2} (1960Ko02), 64.7 s {I13} (1966Gr05), 60.3 s {I10} (1967Ge09), 61.5 s {I20} (1969Ja02), 60.9 s {I10} (1988Ch39) 
J |g to 3/2+ is M4, L=5 in (p,d), (d,t) 
$Measured isomeric Ratio, Relative population with respect to g.s., in decay of GDR in {+142}Nd(|g,n) (1999Pa53,2000Ma35,2000Ts01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2(-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$Level resulting from relocating the 1294|g from 4246 in (|a,3n|g) and (|a,5n|g) (1977Lu04) in ({+24}Mg,|a3n|g) and ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 
J$|g to 11/2- is |DJ=1, (M1+E2) 
T$from (|a,5n|g) from 1293.1|g (previously for the 4246 level) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
J$|g from 17/2- is |DJ=2, E2 
$No |g observed in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) de-exciting this level; possible isomer. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 13/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
T$28 ns {I5} was measured from 348.2|g that in ({+24}Mg,|a3n|g) was shown to be a multiplet (344.9|g, 347.2|g, 348.9|g, and 349.2|g), reason for which it was not assigned to this level or other levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T 1782.2|g and 348.2|g in (|a,5n|g) (1976Lu07) have prompt and delayed (T{-1/2}=26 ns {I5}) components, suggesting that 2886 level is populated by delayed |g from an isomeric state 2886+x 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2)
level_comment:
T$<1 ns was previously assigned to this level in (|a,5n|g) from 1293|g 
J$|g from 25/2-, 4377 is |DJ=1, D (however the placement at 4377 is tentative) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 29/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g from 33/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$No |g observed in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) de-exciting this level; possible isomer or a fragmented decay over several pathways which are too weak to be observed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 35/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 31/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+2}(2+)h{-11/2}{+2}]~# (|nh{-11/2}){+-1} in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 39/2(-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$|g to 35/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+4}(2+)(h{-11/2}){+2}]~# (|nh{-11/2}){+-1} in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 43/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 39/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+2}(6+)h{-11/2}{+2}(10+)]~# (|nh{-11/2}){+-1}; maximum aligned state in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 47/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 43/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+4}(8+)h{-11/2}{+2}(10+)]~# (|nh{-11/2}){+-1} in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 47/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 43/2(-) is |DJ=1, (M1+E2) and |g from 51/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) give contradictory assignments, 45/2(-) and 47/2(-); 47/2(-) more likely based on level scheme sequence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (49/2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 47/2(+) and |g to (47/2+) are assumed |DJ=1 and |p=(+) based on theoretical arguments in ({+48}Ca,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 51/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 47/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+4}(10+)h{-11/2}{+2}(10+)]~# (|nh{-11/2}){+-1}; maximum aligned state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 55/2(-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 51/2(-) is |DJ=2, E2 
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+6}(12+)h{-11/2}{+2}(10+)]~# (|nh{-11/2}){+-1}; maximum aligned state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 17/2
level_comment:
T$28 ns {I5} was measured from 348.2|g that in ({+24}Mg,|a3n|g) was shown to be a multiplet (344.9|g, 347.2|g, 348.9|g, and 349.2|g), reason for which it was not assigned to this level or other levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 21/2
level_comment:
T$<1 ns was previously assigned to this level from 1293|g decay was moved to 2050 level where this |g ray was relocated (see Adopted Levels, Gammas and ({+24}Mg,|a3n|g) datasets) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+,(9/2+)
level_comment:
E$2.31 MeV in Table II (2020Ho05) adopted as 2310 keV by the evaluator 
L$L=4 (2020Ho05,1976Be10,1977El02). Others: L=5 (1978VaZS) 
$C{+2}S=1.1, E=2313 {I10}, L=(4) (1977El02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=0.75, E=2343 {I10} (1976Be10) and C{+2}S=0.50, E=2349 {I5} (2020Ho05). The values of 1976Be10 are adopted in corroboration with 2336.0, (7/2+) level from the |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$C{+2}S=0.90, E=2924 {I10}, L=(5) (1977El02). E=2952 {I21} L=4 in 1978VaZS (possibly different level) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
$No |g observed by 2015Ze02 de-exciting this level; possible isomer. 2015Ze02 comment that 2365.4 level de-excited by 2171.9|g in (p,n|g) cannot be confirmed. However 2171.9|g de-exciting to 1/2+ determines a low-spin value for 2365.4 in (p,n|g) and suggests the existance of a different level in (p,n|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 43/2-
level_comment:
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+2}{-6+}h{-11/2}{+2}{-10+}]~# |nh{-11/2}{+-1}; maximun aligned state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$|g to 43/2- is |DJ=1, (M1+E2) and |g from 51/2- is |DJ=2, E2 give contradictory assignments, 45/2(-) and 47/2(-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 51/2-
level_comment:
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+4}{-10+}h{-11/2}{+2}{-10+}]~# |nh{-11/2}{+-1}; maximun aligned state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 55/2-
level_comment:
$Configuration=|p[(d{-5/2}/g{-7/2}){+6}{-12+}h{-11/2}{+2}{-10+}]~# |nh{-11/2}{+-1}; maximun aligned state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
$Evaluator's note: There is an intensity imbalance of -16 {I9} at this level. Imbalance may be due to missing intensity of 57-keV gamma ray 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$From 1964Kr02 {+143}Nd(|g,n), but no uncertainty assigned Other: 18.6 |ms from 1969Iv02, a preliminary report 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from similarity of B(E1) for 1- to 0+ with B(E1) for 3- to 2+ transition, 1999Pi02 interpret this to be a quadrupole-octupole coupled two-phonon state additional support for J|p from polarization (1990He03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
|m from g=+1.05 {I13} obtained from 1275|g(|q,t) in (|a,4n|g) (1991KaZQ). Configuration=((|p g{-7/2}){+-1}(|p h{-11/2}){++1}) (1991KaZQ) 
T$from (HI,xn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
|m from g=+0.79 {I24} obtained from 472|g(|q,t) in (|a,4n|g) (1991KaZQ). Configuration=((|p d{-5/2}){+-2}(|p g{-7/2}){++2}) (1991KaZQ) 
T$from (HI,xn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (16+)
level_comment:
E may be a doublet with strong 473.7|g and 314.0|g from 7128.9 level and 124.1|g and 241.2|g from 7128.0 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$|G{-0}{+2}/|G (eV)=0.0024 {I4} 
T from |G(0){+2}/|G=2.4 {I4} 
|G(0)=2.0 meV {i3}, |G(0)/|G=100% {I10} (1990Pi04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
$|G{-0}{+2}/|G (eV)=0.0006 {I7} 
|G(0)=1.1 meV {i4}, |G(0)/|G=100% {I20} (1990Pi04) 
E E from 1973Ra01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-0}{+2}/|G (eV)=0.30 {I4} 
J$|p from linear pol (1990He03) Asymmetry ratio of -9.0 (5.6) 
|G{-0}{+2}/|G=295 meV {i44} (2006Vo11) 
|G(0)=228 meV {i34}, |G(0)/|G=100% {I10} (1990Pi04) 
$B(E1)(|^)=21|*10{+-5} {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-0}{+2}/|G (eV)=0.112 {I17} 
$B(E1)(|^)=4.7|*10{+-5} {I7} 
Polarization asymmetry ratio -2.1 (4.2) from (1978Me16) 
Positive parity also suggested by systematic comparison with {+144}Sm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T from |G(|g)=0.34 eV {I4}; |G(0)/|G|<0.84 (1974Te01) 
J|p from angular distribution and polarization (1974Te01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$deduced from |G{-|g0}=228 meV {i34} (1990Pi04) and their measured branching ratios by 1995Be41. T{-1/2}<2.9 fs from DSA (1995Be41) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2) from (|a,|a'); others: 0.27 {I3} (1973Ch13), 0.29 {I4} (1971Ma27), 0.42 {I5} (1966Ec02), |?0.34 (1960Na13) 
T$from B(E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
J L=3 in (d,p), atomic beam (1976Fu06) 
Isotope shift: 2001Mb05, 2005Ma10. 
Calculated |m: 2005Pa26. 
Measurement of hyperfine coupling constant: 2001Ga72, 2004Ma04 
MOMM1$from atomic-beam magnetic resonance (1965Sm04). 
MOME2 others: -0.59 {I3} (1992Le09), -0.56 {I6} (1972Ch54), -0.48 {I2} (1965Sm04), all using the atomic beam method. 
MOME2$From atomic beam laser spectroscopy (1992Au04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$From integral perturbed angular distribution includes correction for paramagnetism 
T from (|a,3n|g); others: 6 ns {i2} ({+7}Li,3n|g) (1975Kl01), 4.0 ns {i12} {+130}Te({+18}O,5n|g) 
J$L=6 in (d,p), |g ray to 7/2- is E3 (from T{-1/2} and |g(|q)); shell model. Dominant component as configuration=((|n f7/2)~#3-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J |g ray to 7/2- is |DJ=2, E2 in (|a,3n|g); |g ray to 13/2+ 
T$0.135 ps {i14} from B(E2)=0.105 {i11} in Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|g ray to 19/2- is |DJ=1, E1; no |g ray to <19/2. Configuration=((|n f7/2)~#7-) (1994Ka23) 
MOMM1$from integral perturbed angular distribution includes correction for paramagnetism 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (23/2)
level_comment:
J$not given in 2000Zh03 
$A 277|g depopulating this level seen by 1998Fa09, not confirmed by 2000Zh03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E,L,S from 1975Ve08, 1967Ch16 
J parent of 7/2- IAR in {+143}Pm (1977Cl02) 
E,J probably 1845 and 1858 levels are identical with 1852.5 (3/2-) and 1851.5 (7/2-) levels observed in (|a,n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$g|G{-|g0} or |G{-|g0} (meV)=6.7 {I22} 
T$from integrated cross section. T{-1/2}=135 fs {i14} in Coul ex 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
L |s(|q) suggests large L and may be fitted with L=5 proposed in 1978VaZS or L=6 needed from adopted J|p=13/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
$2017Wi01 search for population of the 742 level by looking for the deexcitation by a 742|g. Statistics were quite limited, but they report a lower limit to the partial half life > 3.3|x10{+18} y. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$average: 2.65|*10{+15} y {I37} (1987Al28), 2.4|*10{+15} y {I3} (1961Ma05), 2.2|*10{+15} y (1956Po16), 1.9|*10{+15} y (1965Is01) 
$|D<r{+2}>(142,144)=0.269 {I26} (1999GaZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$|m from weighted average of g values, listed in Coulomb excitation 
J$697|g to 0+ g.s. is E2 
T$from adopted B(E2)=0.58 {I1} (1988Ah01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$2073|g to 0+ g.s. is E2 
T$weighted average of 55 fs {I+13-10} (1998Hi09) and 69 fs {I+21-14} (1994Ro13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$582|g to 3- is E2, 1397|g to 2+ is E3, 302|g to 6+ is E1 and 779|g to 4+ is E1 
T$weighted average of 0.8 ps {I+8-3} (1998Hi09) and 0.76 ps {I+20-14} (1999Ro18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$2186|g to 0+ g.s. is E1 
T$from 1998Hi09. Other: 0.02 ps {I+3-1} (1994Ro13), 9.4 fs {I6} in (|g,|g') (1997Ec01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$1979|g to 2+ is E2, seen in {+144}Pr(0-) |b{+-} decay and from |s(E) in (n,n'|g) and |s(|q) in (p,t) reactions 
T$from 1998Hi09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$2046|g to 2+ is E2, seen in {+144}Pr(0-) |b{+-} decay and from |s(E) in (n,n'|g) 
T$from 1998Hi09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
C{+2}S'=0.04 {I1}(L=1), 0.14 {I3}(L=3; part of the strength is due to excitation of {+145}Nd g.s.), 0.39 {I20}(L=5) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
|b{-|lp}=0.0600, |b{-|ld}=0.0530 
|b{-|lp}(2{++}{-1}->4{++})=0.1450, |b{-|ld}(2{++}{-1}->4{++})=0.1230 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
|b{-|lp}=0.0130, |b{-|ld}=0.0140 
|b{-|lp}(2{++}{-1}->2{++})=0.1600, |b{-|ld}(2{++}{-1}->2{++})=0.1900 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
|b{-|lp}=0.0310, |b{-|ld}=0.0330 
|b{-|lp}(2{++}{-1}->2{++})=-0.0800, |b{-|ld}(2{++}{-1}->2{++})=-0.0800 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.58 {I1}, from 1988Ah01. Other values: B(E2)=0.58 {I2} (1986Sc30), 0.56 {I6} (1980FaZW), 0.510 {I16} (1971Cr01), 0.48 {I8} (1967BuZX), 0.44 {I5} (1966Ec02), 0.44 {I33} (1960Na13), 0.23 {I5} (1960Le07) 
$g=0.173 {I14}, weighted average of 0.189 {I21} (1999BeZR), 0.16 {I2} (1990St18), 0.166 {I41} (1987Be08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
T >1|*10{+17} y (1966Ka23). Other: >6|*10{+16} y (no |a) (1965Is01) 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), L=3 in (d,t) 
MOMM1$Atomic beam magnetic resonance (1965Sm04, 1989Ra17, 2005St24). 
MOME2$Atomic beam laser spectroscopy (1992Au04, 2005St24). Other values: -0.29 {I3} (1972Ch24); -0.253 {I10} (1965Sm04). Other: 1989Ra17. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=3 in (d,p), |g from 3/2+ 
MOMM1$Mossbauer effect (1970Ka36, 2005St24). Other: 1989Ra17. 
T from {+145}Pm |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
J L=6 in (d,p); |DJ=2, E2 |g from 1401 to 11/2- and |DJ=1, D |g from 1401 to 1111 uniquely establish J|p(1111)=13/2+, J|p(1401)=15/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=7.7 via 7/2+ parent, |g to 3/2+ and 3/2-; log| {Ift} disagrees with L=1 in (d,p) observed by 1973Ga01 
Note discrepancy in branching for |g's from 1403.92 level in (n,|g), |b{+-} decay and (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2 Other: 0.017 (1963Al30) 
T from B(E2)=0.030 {I2}, branching=0.52 {I1} and |d=+1.30 {I45} (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
T$T{-1/2}(2|b{+-},0|n mode)(theory)=1.18|*10{+28} y (2002Hi09); T{-1/2}(2|b{+-},2|n mode)(theory)=5.2|*10{+32} y (2010PrZZ), 2.1|*10{+31} y (2002Hi09) 
T$T{-1/2}(|a)>1.6|*10{+18} y (2015St09, HPGe); T{-1/2}(|a)(theory)=2.0|*10{+34} y (2002Tr04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$453.8|g E2 to g.s. 0+ 
T$from weighted average of 19.9 ps {I2} from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation, 22.2 ps {I3} from B(E2) in (e, e') reaction and 23 ps {I5} from |g|g(t) {+146}Pr |b- decay 
MOMM1$+0.582 {I14}, projectile Coulomb excitation coupled to the transient field technique (2001Ho02). Others: +0.50 {I8} (1978Ka36,1989Ra17), +0.44 {I6} (1972Ku10), +0.64 {I10} (1987Be08) 
MOME2$-0.78 {I9} (1970Ge08,1989Ra17), Coulomb excitation. Other: -0.72 {I20} (1971Cr01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$589.4|g E2 to 2+, L=4 in (d,d') 
T from B(E2) in Coulomb excitation (1967Bu04,1967BuZX) 
MOMM1$+0.77 {I10}, projectile Coulomb excitation coupled to the transient field technique (2001Ho02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E3)=0.352 {I21} from (e,e') (1993Sa07). Others: from Coulomb excitation, 0.26 {I3}, (1970Ch14), 0.21 {I4} (1967BuZX), 0.41 {I18} (1963Ha20). 
J$735.8|g E1+(M2) to 2+; 6375.0|g M1 from 3-, 4-; in (p,t), (p,p'), (d,d') 3- 
T$from DSA in (n,n'|g) (1995Di06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$883.1|g M1+E2 to 3-, 1030.4|g (E1) to 4+, |g(|q), primary 5492.3|g M1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV; J=3- in (p,p'), (d,d') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$1053|g M1+E2 to 4+, 906.6|g E1+(M2) to 3-, primary 5468.7|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV, J|p=(4+) in (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$1743.8|g M1+E2 to 2+, primary 5367.3|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV, from (p,p'), (d,d') and (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_comment:
J$1182.6|g M1+E2 to 4+; supported by angular correlation measurements in (n,n'|g) (1983Al12); this put limits to the assignment 2+:5+ from primary 5338.2|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV (1976Bu14, table 4; see the same paper, level scheme, fig. 5, where this level is marked as J|p=2+ only). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$from (p,t), 1777.9|g to 2+; primary 5333.7|g M1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV. J conflicts with J=(0+) in (e,e'), perhaps, this is different level with E=2231 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$1243.2|g E2 to 4+, 1832.6|g M1+E2 to 2+, primary 5277.6|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV. J conflicts with J=0+ in (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$1313.5|g M1+E2 (|DJ=0) to 4+, 1167.2|g E1(+M2) to 3-, primary 5207.6|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+:4+
level_comment:
J$1332.3|g to 3-, 2066.0|g to 2+, 1478.6|g to 4+; primary 5043.3|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV. J|p=(4+,5-) in (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$from (p,t), (p,p'), (d,d'). However, |p=+ from primary 4814.5|g E1 (1976Bu14, uncertain isotopic identification) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$from (p,p'), (d,d'), (e,e'), primary 4634.0|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV. However, J|p=3- in (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+,4+
level_comment:
J$primary 4567.9|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV and E(n)=thermal, 2542.4|g to 2+. However, J|p=3- in (p,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$primary 4551.4|g E1 in (n,|g), E(n)=0.2-0.5 keV and E(n)=thermal. However, J|p=3- from (p,p'), (d,d') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2
level_comment:
J$2915.1|g to 2+, 2179.3|g to 3-, 1991.9|g to 1-, 1012.7|g to 1+. J=3- in (p,t) most probably relates to the level of 3356 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-,5
level_comment:
E$2191.8 keV level is introduced as tentative in 1983Al12 to place 1002|g in the decay scheme. 2191.8 keV level is not seen in other datasets and not adopted. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$2314.2 keV level is introduced as tentative in 1983Al12 to place 1124|g in the decay scheme. 2314.2 keV level is not seen in other sets 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$g=+0.291 {I7} (2001Ho02). Others: +0.31 {I5} (1978Ka36), +0.22 {I3} (1972Ku10), +0.29 {I5} (1967Be08), +0.32 {I5} (1987Be08), +0.29 {I1} (1990St18) 
T$from B(E2)=0.770 {I7}: weighted average of 0.78 {I1} (1988Ah01), 0.760 {I22} (1971Cr01), 0.68 {I10} (1967BuZX), 0.71 {I6} (1970Ch14), 0.705 {I34} (1971Ma27), 0.77 {I1} (1986Sc30). Others: 0.66 {I1} (1966Ec02), 0.81 {I7} (1980FaZW), 0.616 {I28} (1974MaYP) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$J from 1957Ke13 by microwave paramagnetic resonance absorption technique and |p from L=3 in {+148}Nd(d,t). 
T$weighted average (NRM) of 11.26 d {I1} (2019Br01, decay curve for 91.1-keV |g, also 11.27 d {I2} from decay curve for 120.5-keV |g, uncertainty gets increased to 0.11 d in averaging procedure, note that no details are given in the paper about counting losses and systematic uncertainties); 10.98 d {I1} (1971Ba28, proportional counter, uncertainty gets increased to 0.03 d in the averaging procedure); 11.02 d {I5} (1963Ho15, proportional counter); 11.14 d {I6} (1960Al33, |b counting); and 11.06 d {I4} (1957Wr37, ionization chamber). Regular weighted average is 11.12 d {I7}, but with reduced |h{+2}=100, which implies a discrepant dataset, primarily due to the value in 2019Br01. Unweighted average is 11.09 d {I9}. NRM=Normalized Residuals Method. Other (less precise) measurements: 11.2 d {I2} (1999Po32, from decay curve for |g rays, 95% confidence level, no details provided); 11.5 d {I5} (1960Wi10, proportional counter); 11.9 d {I3} (1952Ru10, |b with magnetic spectrometer); 11.1 d {I5} (1951Em23, |b spectrometer); 11.6 d {I3} (1951Ko01,1952Ko27, |b spectrometer); 11.0 d {I3} (1951MaZZ, 1947Ma28, integral |b,|g counting); 11.1 d {I2} (1946Bo25). Weighted average (NRM) of all the values is 11.05 d {I3}, with the same inflation of uncertainties for values from 2019Br01 and 1971Ba28 as above. Regular weighted average is 11.12 d {I5}, but with reduced |h{+2}=37. Unweighted average is 11.24 d {I21}. 
T$previous T{-1/2}'s adopted by B. Singh; here what was found by N. Nica: 10.98 D 1 adopted from 1971Ba28 (|b decay with proportional counter measured for 40 T{-1/2}'s). Other precisely reported measurements: 11.26 d {I1} (2019Br01, measured 91|g for about 14.5 T{-1/2}'s - no deadtime correction mentionned), 11.02 d {I5} (1963Ho15, |b decay with proportional counter, measured for about 22 T{-1/2}'s), 11.06 d {I4} (1957Wr37, |b decay measured for 6.3 T{-1/2}'s). Others (all measured by |b decay counters): 11.1 d (1973St22, 91|g and 531|g, no reported unc), 11.5 d {I5} (1960Wi10), 11.6 d {I3} (1951Ko17, 1951Ko01), 11.9 d {I3} (1952Ru10), 11.1 d {I5} (1951Em23), 11.0 d {I3} (1951MaZZ) 
MOMM1$from 1970PiZR measured by atomic beam magnetic resonance; other value: 0.578 {I3} (2005St24) measured by electron paramagnetic resonance (1957Ke13) 
MOME2$measured by atomic beam magnetic resonance - thermal beam (1970PiZR) 
$|m/Q<0 and Q>0 are likely (1970PiZR) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)-
level_comment:
J$(9/2)- is consistent with L=5 ({+3}He,|a) and N=87 syst. Assumed to be |nh{-9/2}; analogous to states at 285 keV in {+149}Sm and at 380 keV in {+151}Gd 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$1/2+,3/2+ from E1 |g to 1/2-, 215 level; 1/2+ less likely from |g from (1/2-,3/2,5/2-), 1261 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2)+
level_comment:
J$L=6 ({+3}He,|a) and N=87 syst (analogous to states at 878 keV in {+149}Sm and at 854 keV in {+151}Gd); i{-13/2} neutron state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$5/2-,7/2- from L=3 (d,t) 1977St22; (3/2-,5/2-) from |g to 1/2-, 214 level and |g to 7/2-, 50 level, 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$(1/2-,3/2,5/2) from |g to 5/2-, 128 level and (1/2,3/2,5/2+) from primary |g from 1/2+ to this level, in {+146}Nd(n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
E$from 2021Wa16; others: 5292.19 {I15} (1975Ro16) 
J$from s-wave capture. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J consistent with E2 |g-decay to 5/2- state, and L=1 (d,t) (1977St22) and J=L-1/2 (pol d,t) (1977St23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J 3/2- from primary |g-feeding, |g-decays to J=1/2-,5/2-,7/2- states. Consistent with L=1 (d,t) (1977St22), J=L+1/2 (pol d,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J 3/2- from primary |g-feeding, |g-decays to J=1/2-,5/2-,7/2- states. Consistent with L=1 (d,t) (1977St22), J=L+1/2 (pol d,t) (1977St23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J 3/2- assignment (1975Ro16) based on tentative primary |g-feeding is not compatible with L=3 (d,t) (1977St22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L=6 assigned in ({+3}He,|a) by 1976LoZP at 939 keV. 13/2+ follows from E(level) systematics of N=87 isotones 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
J (11/2-) ASSIGNED ON (D,T) STRENGTH, L=4,5,6, AND N=87 SYST; ANALOGS AT 1311 KEV IN 149SM AND AT 1209 KEV IN 151GD. 
STRENGTH DISTRIBUTION OF (N)H11/2 HOLE STATE TO DEFORMED NILSSON ORBITALS BY 1977Se04 VIA (3HE,A) E=82 MEV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
Double |b{+-} decay to the lowest 2+ levels of {+148}Sm was not observed (T{-1/2}>2.7|*10{+18} y) (1982Be20); 2009Ba21 give limits for (0|n+2|n) transitions to the 2+{-1}, 0+{-1}, and 2+{-2} states in {+148}Sm of the order of |?(4-8)|*' 10{+20} y 
$Rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.9986 fm {I19} (2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$other value: 79 ps {I1} from B(E2)=1.37 {I2} which is the unweighted average of 1.30 {I6} (1997Ib01), 1.36 {I3} (1971Cr01), 1.39 {I2} (1988Ah01), 1.42 {I5} (1980FaZW), 1.39 {I2} (1986Sc30). Others: 0.96 {I10} (1966Ec02), 0.95 {I15} (1967BuZW) 
MOMM1$measured by transient field integral perturbed angular correlation method; Others: +0.64 {I8} (1978Ka36), +0.86 {I14} (1972Ku10), +0.86 {I14} (1972Ku10), +0.96 {I8} (1970Be36), +1.00 {I8} (1978FaZP), +1.12 {I24} (1967Be08), 0.81 {I8} (1987Be08), 0.70 {I4} (1997StZR,1990St18) 
MOME2 Others: -1.36 {I30} (1971Cr01), -0.67 {I11} (1978FaZP) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$measured by transient field integral perturbed angular correlation method 
T$other value: 6.9 ps {I2} from B(E2)(2+{-1} |) 4+{-1})=0.784 {I24}, which is the unweighted average of 0.80 {I3} (1997Ib01) and 0.768 {I24} (1980FaZW); other: 0.81 (1967BuZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1$measured by transient field integral perturbed angular correlation method 
J |g to 4+ is E2 from lin pol 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J |g|g(|q) in {+148}Pr |b{+-} decay suggest J=0; |g(|q) and observation of 1645 in (n,n'|g) suggest J=1,2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=9 {I3} 
|G{-|g0}/|G=100% {I20} with |G{-|g0}=9 meV 3; or, |G{-|g0}/|G=66% {I20} with |G{-|g0}=14 meV 6 (see the comment on the 3717 gamma). These correspond to T{-1/2}=51 fs {I20} and 33 fs {I17}, respectively 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2)=1.37 {I2}, unweighted average of: 1.30 {I6} (1997Ib01), 1.36 {I3} (1971Cr01), 1.39 {I2} (1988Ah01), 1.42 {I5} (1980FaZW), 1.39 {I2} (1986Sc30). Others: 0.96 {I3} (1966Ec02), 0.95 {I15} (1967BuZW) 
T$2003Na39 give 78.00 ps with no uncertainty 
G$others: +0.363 {I16} (2005Ho25, superseded by 2001Ho02), +0.35 {I2} (1990St18), +0.41 {I4} (1987Be08), +0.32 {I4} (1978Ka36), +0.43 {I7} (1972Ku10), +0.48 {I4} (1970Be36), +0.50 {I4} (1968Be42), +0.56 {I12} (1967Be08) 
Q=-0.67 {I11} (1978FaZP). Others: -1.36 {I30} (1971Cr01), -1.46 {I13} (1970Ge08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2)(2+{-1} |) 4+{-1})=0.80 {I3} (1997Ib01), 0.768 {I24} (1980FaZW). Other: 0.81 (1967BuZX) 
J from |a|g(|q) (1963Ha20) 
T$2003Na39 give 7.03 ps with no uncertainty 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2)(2+{-1} |) 0+{-2})=0.025 {I1} (1997Ib01), 0.039 {I7} (1980FaZW) B(E2)(2+ to 0+)=0.039 {I7} (1980FaZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J from |a|g(|q) (1963Ha20) 
B(E3)|^=0.32 {I2} (1997Ib01), 0.40 {I8} (1988Ah01), 0.13 {I4} (1967BuZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
B(E1)|^=0.010 {I+2-1} (1997Ib01), 0.014 {I6} (1990Pi04, as quoted by 1997Ib01). B(E1)(2+{-1} |) 1-)=0.0036 {I+5-13} (1997Ib01), 0.006 {I5} (1990Pi04, as quoted by 1997Ib01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2)(2+{-1} |) 2+{-2})=0.085 {I5} (1997Ib01), 0.12 {I2} (1980FaZW). B(E2)(0+{-1} |) 2+{-2})=0.015 {I1} (1997Ib01), 0.020 {I3} (1980FaZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2)|^=0.073 {I3} (1997Ib01), 0.084 {I12} (1980FaZW). B(E2)(2+{-1} |) 2+{-3})=0.026 {I1} (1997Ib01), 0.026 {I6} (1980FaZW) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$unweighted average of 1.728 h {I1} (|g counting,1990Ab02); 1.72 h {I1} (integral |g counting,1966Ri03); 1.73 h {I1} (integral |g counting,1966He04). Others: 1.5 h {I3} (|g,2015Ba10); 1.5 h {I2} (1999Po32, 95% confidence limit, authors give units of days which is probably a misprint); 1.73 h (|g,1981Di01); 1.8 h, 2.0 h, 2.2 h (|g counting,1973St22); 1.8 h {I1} (1967Me19); 1.77 h (|b counting,1964Ho03); 1.8 h {I1} (|g,1960Wi10); 1.8 h {I1} (ce counting,1952Ru10); 1.7 h (1950Ma05); 2.00 h {I5} (|b,1946Bo25); 2.0 h (|b,1938Po05) 
J$from atomic beam (1964Bu09,1962Bu21), L(pol d,t)=3; L-1/2 from Ay(|q). Configuration=|n5/2[523] 
MOMM1,MOME2$from atomic beam method (1970PiZR) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3; L+1/2 from Ay(|q) 
T$from |b{+-} decay. Unweighted average of 0.11 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, |g|g(t)) and 278 ps {I27} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3; L-1/2 from Ay(|q) 
T$from |b{+-}. Unweighted average of 0.14 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, |g|g(t)) and 216 ps {I14} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=5; L-1/2 from Ay(|q) 
T$weighted average of 1.60 ns {I4} (2014Ko27, |g|g(t)); 1.65 ns {I19} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) in |b{+-}; and 2.1 ns {I5} from p|g(t) in (d,p|g) (1979Ka16,1977HaXX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1; L+1/2 marginally supported by Ay(|q). However, J|p=1/2- is excluded by |g to 7/2- which cannot be M3 from RUL 
T$from |b{+-}. Weighted average of 0.22 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, |g|g(t)) and 202 ps {I8} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3,4; L+1/2 from Ay(|q). Comparison of |g-ray transition probabilities in (d,p|g) with those from model-dependent calculations; |g from (11/2-) and population in {+252}Cf SF decay also support 9/2+. L({+3}He,|a)=(3) is inconsistent with (9/2+) 
T$from |b{+-}. Weighted average of 0.42 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, |g|g(t)) and 424 ps {I60} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)). Other: 5.1 ns {I3} from |g|g(t) and/or p|g(t) in (d,p|g) is in severe disagreement with the values from |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3 for 316+321; L-1/2 from Ay(|q). 1981Ha39 favor J=L-1/2 
T$|b|g|g(t) (2010Ru09) in |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=2; L+1/2 marginally supported by Ay(|q). However, 3/2+ is excluded by |g to 7/2- which cannot be M2 from RUL 
T$|b|g|g(t) (2010Ru09) in |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1; L+1/2 marginally supported by Ay(|q). However, 1/2- is excluded by |g to 7/2- which cannot be M3 from RUL 
T$p|g(t) in (d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=3 for a doublet (447+459); L+1/2 is favored by Ay(|q). Also L({+3}He,|a)=3 for a 455 group 
T$|b|g|g(t) (2010Ru09) in |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=1; L+1/2 marginally supported by Ay(|q). However, 1/2- is excluded by |g to 5/2+ which cannot be M2 from RUL 
T$p|g(t) in (d,p|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=2 gives 3/2+,5/2+ for 705+709 levels; L-1/2 is preferred from Ay(|q); possible |b{+-} feeding from (5/2+) parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=4; |g to 5/2-. L({+3}He,|a)=2 for 873 {I10} level seems to agree with J|p value for 881 level, rather than with that for 862.8 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2)
level_comment:
J$primary |g from 1/2+ capture state; L(d,t)=1 for 913 and/or 920 levels suggests negative for either or both levels; 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J$L(pol d,t)=2; L-1/2 marginally supported by Ay(|q). L({+3}He,|a)=(5) is inconsistent, but L({+3}He,|a)=2 is also possible 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$unweighted average of 0.11 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, from average of three values for (162|g)(109|g)(t), (208|g)(109|g)(t), and (224|g)(109|g)(t)) and 278 ps {I27} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$unweighted average of 0.14 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, from average of three values for (120|g)(138|g)(t), (227|g)(138|g)(t), and (433|g)(138|g)(t)) and 216 ps {I14} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from the Adopted Levels. 1.60 ns {I4} from weighted average of 1.60 ns {I4} (2014Ko27, (112|g+109|g)(t)) and 1.65 ns {I19} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.22 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, average of three values for (313|g)(258|g)(t), (623|g)(258|g)(t), and (662|g)(258|g)(t)) and 202 ps {I8} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 0.42 ns {I3} (2014Ko27, (162|g+109|g)(t)) and 424 ps {I60} (2010Ru09, |b|g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
T$|b|g|g(t) (2010Ru09) 
$Level proposed by 2010Ru09, with the two new |g rays of 285.8 and 341.31 from this level, which do not fit well in the decay scheme within the quoted uncertainties 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level proposed by 2010Ru09, considered as uncertain by the evaluators, as it is not supported by |g|g-coin data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$1979Ka16 use particle-rotor model with a nonspherical Woods-Saxon potential to predict the 9/2+ to 7/2- transition probability for seven N=89, 91 and 93 nuclei. The qualitative agreement between these and the measured probabilities is used as an argument for the 9/2+ assignment. 
T$from 1979Ka16. Note that this value is in severe disagreement with 0.42 ns {I3} in the Adopted Levels, where the value is from |g|g(t) and |b|g(t) in |b{+-} decay of {+149}Pr. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2008Ja01 associate this level with 510 {I3} in (d,t) for which L=6 was deduced. 
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=14 (60|'), 22 (90|'), 11 (125|') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
L$3 (1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.02 (2008Ja01), 0.08 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=73 (1981Ha39), 131 (1980Lo06), 27 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=23 (60|'), 8 (90|'), 22 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$108 {I3} (2008Ja01), 109 {I2} (1981Ha39), 108 {I5} (1980Lo06), 108 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$3 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.40 (2008Ja01), 0.48 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=676 (1981Ha39), 985 (1980Lo06), 292 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=275 (60|'), 141 (90|'), 60 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$138 {I3} (2008Ja01), 139 {I2} (1981Ha39), 138 {I5} (1980Lo06), 138 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$3 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.12 (2008Ja01), 0.20 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=265 (1981Ha39), 342 (1980Lo06), 81 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=77 (60|'), 35 (90|'), 20 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$165 {I3} (2008Ja01), 165 {I2} (1981Ha39), 162 {I5} (1980Lo06), 165 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.10 (2008Ja01), 0.16 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=768 (1981Ha39), 817 (1980Lo06), 234 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=225 (60|'), 98 (90|'), 36 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
$A 165.1|g shown in (d,t|g) (1980Ka24) in coin with a 120.3|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$192 {I2} (1981Ha39), 193 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$(5) (1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=20 (1981Ha39), 17 (1973Bu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
E$220 {I3} (2008Ja01), 221 {I2} (1981Ha39), 217 {I5} (1980Lo06), 220 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$5 (1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.49 (2008Ja01), 1.5 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=90 (1981Ha39), 186 (1980Lo06), 39 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=27 (60|'), 35 (90|'), 19 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
E$256 {I3} (2008Ja01), 257 {I2} (1981Ha39), 258 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.01 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=216 (1981Ha39), 54 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=26 (60|'), 10 (90|'), 6 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-,9/2+)
level_comment:
E$268 {I3} (2008Ja01), 270 {I2} (1981Ha39), 273 {I5} (1980Lo06), 271 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$3 (1980Lo06), 3,4 (1981Ha39), 4 (2008Ja01) 
S$0.22 (2008Ja01) 
J$(9/2+) (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=267 (1981Ha39), 417 (1980Lo06), 103 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=81 (60|'), 55 (90|'), 20 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
J$7/2- is favored over 9/2+ by (pol d,t) data. 1973Bu02 and 1981Ha39 suggest that the behavior of these weakly populated states is being distorted by multistep processes not considered in the theoretical calculations. (9/2+) in adopted levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$285 {I3} (2008Ja01), 286 {I2} (1981Ha39), 283 {I5} (1980Lo06), 285 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.05 (2008Ja01), 0.07 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=340 (1981Ha39), 397 (1980Lo06), 98 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=95 (60|'), 46 (90|'), 20 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
$A 120.3|g shown in (d,t|g) (1980Ka24) in coin with a 165.1|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$320 {I3} (2008Ja01), 318 {I2} (1981Ha39), 319 {I5} (1980Lo06), 318 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$3 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.48 (2008Ja01), 0.79 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=717 (1981Ha39), 1179 (1980Lo06), 286 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=302 (60|'), 181 (90|'), 56 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
$The 316 and 321 levels observed in |b{+-} and (n,|g) are unresolved in this work. See the Adopted Levels for discussion. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$333 {I2} (1981Ha39), 332 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=192 (1981Ha39), 29 (1973Bu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$339 {I3} (2008Ja01), 340 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$6 (1973Bu02,2008Ja01) 
S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=42 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=10 (60|'), 43 (90|'), 36 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$366 {I3} (2008Ja01), 366 {I2} (1981Ha39), 365 {I5} (1980Lo06), 366 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.15 (2008Ja01), 0.19 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=992 (1981Ha39), 806 (1980Lo06), 296 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=316 (60|'), 137 (90|'), 53 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$403 {I3} (2008Ja01), 403 {I2} (1981Ha39), 402 {I5} (1980Lo06), 402 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.03 (2008Ja01), 0.06(1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=257 (1981Ha39), 268 (1980Lo06), 73 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=61 (60|'), 20 (90|'), 11 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$from 1973Bu02 where it seems resolved from 457 peak. Values are: 447 {I3} (2008Ja01), 451 {I2} (1981Ha39, unresolved), 450 {I5} (1980Lo06), 447 {I2} (1973Bu02, 447 and 457 resolved) 
L$3 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.16 (2008Ja01), 0.22 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=242 (1981Ha39), 339 (1980Lo06), 82 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=86 (60|'), 57 (90|'), 19 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
E$from 1973Bu02 who report partially resolved levels at 447 and 457 with 82% of the cross section associated with the 447 level. They assign L=3 to the composite peak 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$482 {I3} (2008Ja01), 482 {I2} (1981Ha39), 483 {I5} (1980Lo06), 481 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$0 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.02 (2008Ja01), 0.08 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=600 (1981Ha39), 370 (1980Lo06), 72 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=67 (60|'), 27 (90|'), 12 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$510 {I3} (2008Ja01), 525 {I2} (1981Ha39, 529 labeled in their spectral Fig. 1), 510 {I5} (1980Lo06), 512 {I2} (1973Bu02). Value of 525 {I2} in 1981Ha39 seems discrepant, not used in averaging. This level is probably same as the 517.44 observed in |b{+-} decay and in (n,|g), and 510 {I5} in (d,t) and 516 {I10} in ({+3}He,|a) reported by 1980Lo06 
L,S$from 2008Ja01 for 510 group 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=117 (1981Ha39), 44 (1980Lo06), 11 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=9 (60|'), 20 (90|'), 16 (125|') (2008Ja01) for a level at 510 keV {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$548 {I3} (2008Ja01), 548 {I2} (1981Ha39), 544 {I5} (1980Lo06), 547 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.13 (2008Ja01), 0.17 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=881 (1981Ha39), 709 (1980Lo06), 266 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=237 (60|'), 114 (90|'), 44 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
$A 383.6|g shown in (d,t|g) (1980Ka24) in coin with a 165.1|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$571 {I3} (2008Ja01), 570 {I2} (1981Ha39), 569 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=106 (1981Ha39), 43 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=43 (60|'), 30 (90|'), 9 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$589 {I3} (2008Ja01), 591 {I2} (1981Ha39), 588 {I5} (1980Lo06), 590 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$5 (1980Lo06), 2 (1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.03 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=64 (1981Ha39), 108 (1980Lo06), 24 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=26 (60|'), 16 (90|'), 20 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
J$proposed as a doublet by 1981Ha39 to reconcile their 5/2+ assignment in (pol d,t) with the L({+3}He,|a)=5 (1980Lo06) giving 9/2-, 11/2- for the second component 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$611 {I3} (2008Ja01), 613 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L,S$from 2008Ja01. Other: L=(6) (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=4 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=7 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$645 {I3} (2008Ja01), 647 {I2} (1981Ha39), 648 {I5} (1980Lo06), 646 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$5 (1980Lo06), 5,(6) (1981Ha39), 5 (2008Ja01) 
S$1.77 (2008Ja01), 1.7 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=222 (1981Ha39), 389 (1980Lo06), 77 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=65 (60|'), 113 (90|'), 71 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$706 {I3} (2008Ja01), 709 {I2} (1981Ha39), 708 {I5} (1980Lo06), 707 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.49 (2008Ja01), 0.70 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=1526 (1981Ha39), 1359 (1980Lo06), 575 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=561 (60|'), 406 (90|'), 185 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
J$3/2+ from (pol d,t). However, the data may be distorted by an unknown contribution from the 705 state excited in {+149}Pr |b{+-} decay. See adopted levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$738 {I3} (2008Ja01), 740 {I2} (1981Ha39), 742 {I5} (1980Lo06), 739 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.25 (2008Ja01), 0.44 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=618 (1981Ha39), 682 (1980Lo06), 264 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=267 (60|'), 193 (90|'), 103 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$796 {I2} (1981Ha39), 796 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$0 (1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=198 (1981Ha39), 32 (1973Bu02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$812 {I3} (2008Ja01), 813 {I2} (1981Ha39), 815 {I5} (1980Lo06), 813 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$0 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.23 (2008Ja01), 0.37 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=1586 (1981Ha39), 1731 (1980Lo06), 358 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=401 (60|'), 258 (90|'), 132 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
$A 529|g shown in coin with 120.3|g and 165.1|g in (d,t|g) (1980Ka24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$831 {I3} (2008Ja01), 836 {I2} (1981Ha39), 837 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L,S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=152 (1981Ha39), 34 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=10 (60|'), 10 (90|'), 14 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$860 {I3} (2008Ja01), 861 {I2} (1981Ha39), 862 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L,S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=80 (1981Ha39), 23 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=16 (60|'), 21 (90|'), 13 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E$880 {I3} (2008Ja01), 880 {I2} (1981Ha39), 881 {I5} (1980Lo06), 881 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.15 (2008Ja01), 0.28 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=360 (1981Ha39), 470 (1980Lo06), 149 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=159 (60|'), 102 (90|'), 57 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$918 {I3} (2008Ja01), 915 {I2} (1981Ha39), 915 {I5} (1980Lo06), 918 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L,S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=55 (1981Ha39), 91 (1980Lo06), 18 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=5 (60|'), 27 (90|'), 13 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$959 {I3} (2008Ja01), 956 {I2} (1981Ha39), 954 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L,S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=435 (1981Ha39), 16 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=34 (60|'), 33 (90|'), 18 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$984 {I3} (2008Ja01), 985 {I2} (1981Ha39), 984 {I5} (1980Lo06), 986 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$0 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.53 (2008Ja01), 0.96 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=3249 (1981Ha39), 4595 (1980Lo06), 950 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=977 (60|'), 580 (90|'), 200 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
$A 436.5|g shown in coin with a 165.1|g in (d,t|g) (1980Ka24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1025 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1025 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1026 {I5} (1980Lo06), 1027 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.04 (2008Ja01), 0.05 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=195 (1981Ha39), 265 (1980Lo06), 50 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=44 (60|'), 28 (90|'), 16 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1044 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1045 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1039 {I5} (1980Lo06), 1046 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1980Lo06,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.08 (2008Ja01), 0.23 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=230 (1981Ha39), 401 (1980Lo06), 66 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=66 (60|'), 55 (90|'), 28 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1060 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1067 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1067 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=35 (1981Ha39), 5 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=13 (90|'), 10 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
E$incompletely resolved from 1045 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1086 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1081 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1083 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=55 (1981Ha39), 19 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=8 (60|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1128 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1129 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1130 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1973Bu02,1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.12 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=342 (1981Ha39), 101 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=83 (60|'), 85 (90|'), 44 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1147 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1149 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1150 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$2 (1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.04 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=84 (1981Ha39), 25 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=33 (60|'), 17 (90|'), 13 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1181 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1178 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1178 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=53 (1981Ha39), 9 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=14 (60|') (2008Ja01) for 1181 {I6} level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1240 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1244 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1246 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L,S$from 2008Ja01 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=85 (1981Ha39), 24 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=23 (60|'), 29 (90|'), 12 (125|') (2008Ja01) for 1240 {I6} level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
E$1287 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1282 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1283 {I2} (1973Bu02) 
L$1 (1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.02 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=85 (1981Ha39), 22 (1973Bu02) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=13 (60|'), 12 (90|'), 7 (125|') (2008Ja01) 
J$L(d,t)=0 to a 1273 group (1980Lo06) has been ignored in subsequent work (1981Ha39) by same authors, suggesting that they believe there is only one level there with L=1. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1353 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1359 {I2} (1981Ha39) 
L$0 (1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.01 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=122 (1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=17 (60|'), 10 (90|'), 5 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1479 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1481 {I2} (1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=170 (1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=13 (60|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1503 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1505 {I2} (1981Ha39) 
L$1 (1981Ha39,2008Ja01) 
S$0.04 (2008Ja01) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=244 (1981Ha39) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=36 (60|'), 10 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1531 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1531 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L$(0) (1980Lo06), 1 (1981Ha39) 
S$0.04 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=116 (1981Ha39), 176 (1980Lo06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1547 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1553 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1555 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L$(0) (1980Lo06), 1 (1981Ha39) 
S$0.04 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=110 (1981Ha39), 163 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=18 (60|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1616 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1622 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1622 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=40 (1981Ha39), 100 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=9 (60|'), 22 (90|'), 11 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1702 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1709 {I2} (1981Ha39), 1706 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=86 (1981Ha39), 148 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=34 (90|'), 26 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1724 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1718 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=103 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=12 (90|'), 11 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1741 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1736 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=107 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=13 (60|'), 15 (90|'), 5 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1789 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1785 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=340 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=67 (60|'), 57 (90|'), 44 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1821 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1817 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=198 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=3 (60|'), 8 (90|'), 8 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1864 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1858 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=326 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=53 (60|'), 52 (90|'), 24 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1884 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1882 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=103 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=1 (60|'), 12 (90|'), 8 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1918 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1909 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=76 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=5 (60|'), 4 (90|'), 6 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1983 {I6} (2008Ja01), 1980 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=179 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=19 (60|'), 10 (90|'), 11 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2033 {I6} (2008Ja01), 2029 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=305 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=24 (60|'), 26 (90|'), 20 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2052 {I6} (2008Ja01), 2055 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=135 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=8 (90|'), 6 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2086 {I6} (2008Ja01) 2078 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=333 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=54 (60|'), 54 (90|'), 32 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2103 {I6} (2008Ja01), 2102 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=162 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=8 (90|'), 5 (125|') (2008Ja01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2237 {I6} (2008Ja01), 2227 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=174 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=11 (60|'), 17 (90|') (2008Ja01) for 2237 {I6} level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$2303 {I6} (2008Ja01), 2293 {I5} (1980Lo06) 
L,S$from 1980Lo06 
$d|s/d|W(mb/sr)=569 (1980Lo06) 
$d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=47 (60|'), 48 (90|') (2008Ja01) for 2303 {I6} level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$from the Adopted Levels 
$Capture rate to excited states (directly feeding g.s.)=0.78 |*10{+6} s{+-1} {I35}, corresponding to a percentage of 6.6% {I29} per muon capture (2019Zi01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from 2010Si06, 2009Ar10. The half-life for the decay to the first 0+ state in {+150}Sm is 1.33|*10{+20}~y (2009Ba21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$decay to 0+,2+; L=1, natural parity in inelastic scattering, member of K=0 octupole band. 
T$from DSAM in (n,n'|g), other: 0.36~ps~{I+5-9} Coul. Ex. (2004Zi02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from comparison of expected relative cross section and intensity of 747.6-keV |g ray, and also decay to 4+ and 6+ levels in (d,d'|g). Systematics of N=90 nuclei support interpretation as 5- member of octupole band. 
T$from DSAM in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from Coulomb excitation and decay to 4+, 6+ states. Interpretation as member of |b band supported by systematics of N=90 nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J$from comparison of expected relative cross section, intensity of 747.6~keV |g ray, and also decay to 4+ and 6+ levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$(2+ to 4+)=1.52 {I11} (1973FrZN reported in 1976Ba18) 
T$adopted value. Weighted average of 60.4~ps~{I5} (2002Kr09), 63~ps~{I3} (1978Ya02) and 61~ps~{I4} from B(E2). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 6.2~ps~{I3} (2002Kr09) and 5.5~ps~{I2} from B(E2)(2+ to 0+). Other: 11.36~ps~{I+7-14} (2004Zi02) 
E$level observed by 1965Yo04. 
$B(E2) (from 130-keV (2+) level)=0.0428 {I19} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 12.3~ps~{I7} (2002Kr09) and 12.6~ps~{I7} from B(E2)(4+ to 6+) 
$B(E2)(4+ to 6+)=1.44 {I10} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$measured as >(1.1-3.2)|*10{+21} y at 90% confidence level by 2017Ar12 for 0|n4|b{+-} decay mode, the range depending on a particular model used for electron energy distribution. 
$From their experiment, 2017Ar12 estimate a ratio of >120 for 0|n2|b{+-} to 0|n4|b{+-} decay modes, while theoretical ratio is calculated as |?10{+46} by 2013He20 (Europhys. Lett. 103, 32001) based on their model used, indicated that extreme advancements in the detection system are required to enable detection of such a rare decay process. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T$measured at 90% confidence level (2018Ki17) for the decay to the first excited 0+ state (1207 keV) in {+150}Gd. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$for 2|n2|b{+-} decay mode, reported as 9.34|*10{+18} y {I22} (stat) {I+62-60} (syst) (2016Ar12). 
T$other: >2.0|*10{+22} y at 90% confidence level for 0|n2|b{+-} decay mode. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$for 2|n2|b{+-} decay to the first excited state of {+150}Nd; reported as 1.11|*10{+20} y {I+19-14} (stat) {I+17-15} (syst) (203Ag06). 
T$others: >136|*10{+20} y at 90% confidence level for 0|n2|b{+-} decay mode to the first excited 0+ state, >2.4|*10{+20} y at 90% confidence level for 2|n2|b{+-} decay mode to the first excited 2+ state, and >126|*10{+20} y at 90% confidence level for 0|n2|b{+-} decay mode to the first excited 2+ state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$from 1966ZgZZ. Others: 12~min (1950Ma05), 12~min~{I1} (1952Ru10), 17~min~{I5} (1958Wi42), 1965Fo08, 1960Wi10, 1959Sc39 
J$log| {Ift}=5.4 to 5/2+ and log| {Ift}=7.2 to 1/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$|g from (9/2-), |g to (5/2)+ and probable |g to (5/2)- suggest 5/2-, 7/2 but 7/2- favored by probable assignment to 3/2[532] band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E$this level may correspond to 258.9, (9/2+) level reported in (d,p), but energy difference between 13/2+ and 9/2+ does not match 149.4|g reported by 1996Ba34. In neighboring N=91 nuclides, 13/2+ bandhead is at 214 ({+155}Gd), 239 ({+157}Dy), 226 ({+159}Er) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-,7/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(d,p)=(3). Possibly the 5/2[523] bandhead. The |g-ray data between different reactions are discrepant. It is possible that two different levels are populated near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_comment:
E$this level may correspond to 258.9, (9/2+) level reported in (d,p), but energy difference between 13/2+ and 9/2+ does not match 149.4|g reported by 1996Ba34 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T weighted average of 11.6 min {I7} (1990Sh24), 11.4 min {I2} (1971Da19), and 11.3 min {I4} (1969Wa25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 0+ and (3-). B(EL)(W.u.) values for the g.s. transition are consistent only with mult(1542|g)=M2 or E3. Values for J=1 and for J{+|p}=2+ are unreasonably small, and values for higher multipoles exceed RUL. |g|g(|q) results are consistent with J=1, 2, or 3. The 393|g to (1-) is mainly M1. The 1542 level is suggested as the bandhead of a K{+|p}=2- band (see 1988Ka14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 6+, 8+, and (6-). BCS-Nilsson calculations suggest 7- with configuration |p5/2-[532]~#|p9/2+[404] 
T$From 2010Ye10 in {+252}Cf SF decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6+,7,8+)
level_comment:
E$Probably fed from the 80-ns 2241 level, but the expected 20-keV transition is below the author's detection threshold 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$3/2-,5/2-,7/2- from log| {Ift}=5.4 allowed |b- to 5/2- g.s. of {+153}Pm; 5/2-,7/2- excluded by systematics of 3/2- g.s. and 5/2+ excited state bandheads for N=92 isotones (2010Si03, {+252}Cf SF dataset) 
T From weighted average of 32.3 s {I2} (1996Ta26), 28.9 s {I4} (1987Gr12, 1988GrZY, 1990An31), and 32 s {I4} (1979PiZP); these values are not consistent with a reduced-|h{+2}=29 for this average. In computing this average, the evaluator has already increased the uncertainty of 0.1 given in 1996Ta26 to 0.2 in order to reduce its relative weight. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$E1 |g to (3/2)- g.s.; assignment changed from (5/2-) (1996Ya12, |b{+-} decay) by 2010Si03 ({+252}Cf SF decay) 
T$weighted average of 1.06 |ms {I5} (1996Ya12, {+153}Pr |b{+-} decay) and 1.17 |ms {I7} (2010Si03, {+252}Cf SF decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J Assigned as 5/2+ from 5/2[642] in 1996Ya12, but as (5/2)- from 3/2-[521] ground-state band in {+252}Cf SF; the latter is assigned in the {+153}Nd Adopted Levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$adopted value, weighted average of 1.06 |ms {I5} (1996Ya12, {+153}Pr |b{+-} decay, from |b|g(t)) and 1.17 |ms {I7} (2010Si03, {+252}Cf SF decay, |g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$ from fitting an exponential function to the time spectra sum of E|g=191.7+141.8 (2010Si03) 
J$assignment changed from (5/2-) (1996Ya12, |b{+-} decay) to (5/2+) by 2010Si03 based on measured multipolarity of 141.8|g and 191.7|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$From {+154}Nd |b{+-} decay (1987Gr12); other: 26 s {I2}, from |b{+-} decay (1985Ka17). The value of 1987Gr12 is also given by the same authors in 1986GrZZ, 1988GrZY and 1990An31. 1974Bu09 report 40 s {I10}, but 1985Ka17 state that this half-life should not be assigned to {+154}Nd and 1987Gr12 conclude it should be assigned to {+155}Pm. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$probably the 1- bandhead of the K|p=(1-) band, |a=1 band in (n,F|g) (2009Si21); compatible with |g's to 0+ and 2+ in {+154}Pr |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$1974ClZX in ({+252}Cf SF decay) report two isomeric decays, 162.6 {I2} (T{-1/2}=1.300 |ms {41}) in {+154}Nd that primarily decays to the 4+ level and very little to the 6+ level, and a 169.9 {I2} (T{-1/2}=1.003 |ms {37}) assigned to mass 154. Similarly, 1970Jo20 also in ({+252}Cf SF decay) report two isomeric decays, 162.5 (T{-1/2}=2.1 |ms) and 169.9 (T{-1/2}=1.7 |ms) both in mass 154. In (n,F|g) a 169.8 {I3} |g ray was identified at this (4-) isomer, but no 162 |g ray. Overall, despite the missing evidence, the evaluator would tentatively place the 162 transitions also to this isomer 
T$weighted average of 3.2 |ms {I3} (2009Si21) and 2.7 |ms {I3} (2013YoZZ). All studies are from (n,F|g) by fitting the summed time spectra of the most intense delayed |g rays 
$Dominant configuration=|n5/2[642]~#|n3/2[521] (2009Si21, (n,F|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$No evidence was found by 2009Si21 ((n,F|g)) for a (5-) isomer with T{-1/2}>1 |ms reported in 1998Ga12 ({+252}Cf,{+248}Cm SF decay), reason for which the evaluator considers the existence of this level as questionable 
J$From |g's to 4+ and 6+ levels which imply J|p=4+,5,6+. (5-) is preferred by 1998Ga12 on the basis of similarity with the 5- isomer in the isotone {+156}Sm. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E,J,T$Adopted values 
E$1974ClZX in ({+252}Cf SF decay) report two isomeric decays, 162.6 {I2} (T{-1/2}=1.300 |ms {41}) in {+154}Nd that primarily decays to the 4+ level and very little to the 6+ level, and a 169.9 {I2} (T{-1/2}=1.003 |ms {37}) assigned to mass 154. Similarly, 1970Jo20 also in ({+252}Cf SF decay) report two isomeric decays, 162.5 (T{-1/2}=2.1 |ms) and 169.9 (T{-1/2}=1.7 |ms) both in mass 154. In (n,F|g) a 169.8 {I3} |g ray was identified at this (4-) isomer, but no 162 |g ray. Overall, despite the missing evidence, the evaluator would tentatively place the 162 transitions also to this isomer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.2 |ms {I3} (2009Si21); 2.7 |ms {I3} (2013YoZZ, superseding 2.7 |ms {I5} from 2012YoZZ). All studies done by fitting the summed time spectra of the most intense delayed |g rays 
$ Dominant configuration=|n5/2[642]~#|n3/2[521] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$tentative assignment of 2008Hw02 based on (3/2-) for the g.s. of {+153}Nd and {+155,157}Sm 
T from 1987Gr12, |g(t), K| x ray(t). This value is also reported in other publications (1988GrZY,1990An31) from this group. Other: 9.5 s {I7} (1986Ok08,1990Ok04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T average of 5.47 s {I11} (1987Gr12), |g(t), and 5.06 s {I13} (2007Sh05), |g(t), with the uncertainty chosen large enough to include both values. Other: 5.51 s 10, from an unpublished laboratory progress report (1989OkZX). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$|g's to 4+ and 6+ members of the g.s. band. J{+|p} value and conf assignment are inferred by 1998Ga12 and 2009Si21 (SF decay) from nuclear-model calculations. The small reduced transition probabilities observed for the deexciting |g's suggest K-forbidden transitions, consistent with a relatively large initial-state K value. 
T$From 2009Si21, SF decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from 2009Si21, delayed |g(t). The value actually listed by these authors is 356~ns~{I145}. 1998Ga12, from delayed |g's from fission, list T{-1/2}=135~ns (or 0.135~|ms). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|n5/2[523] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
$ Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=980 nb {I40} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$From 2017Wu04 following a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$configuration=|n5/2[523] ~# |n7/2[633] 
J$based on coin relations and decay pattern; K|p=(6-) (2016Id02), which corrects K|p=(7-), |p5/2[532] ~# |p9/2[404] (2015TaZX). 2016Id02 argue that the latter state is energetically unfavored and lie about 200 keV higher in energy than the former state. 
T$from |g(t) (2016Id02, 2015TaZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=758 ms, %|b{+-}n=0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=676.9 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.38, 0.60 (2021Mi17, two values of %|b{+-}n for different fission barriers) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity of {+159}Nd 
J$tentative (7/2+), based on |n7/2[633] orbital from systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei, as proposed in the 2017 evaluation, and in 2021Ko07. 2019Mo01 suggest |W{-n}=1/2- from theoretical considerations. 
T$from 2017Wu04, using a fit to the (implanted ions)|b{+-}(t) spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
$Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=39 nb {I4} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Mainly |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
E$ the observed {+160}Nd fragments assumed to correspond to the g.s. 
T$from 2017Wu04 (fit of the time distribution of electrons detected after the implantation of an ion, correlated to them in position and time employing the least-squared and unbinned maximum likelihood methods in a parallel analysis that included contributions from the methods in decays of parent, daughters, granddaughters, as well as a constant background) and 0.54 s from theoretical calculations (2019Mo01) 
$ Production |s=9.5 nb {I22} (2012Ku26) (at 1 GeV/nucleon) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
CONF$|n1/2[521] ~# |n7/2[633] (2016Id02, projected shell-model and deformed Hartree-Fock calculations) 
J$based on coin relations and decay pattern; K|p=(4-) (2016Id02, 2015TaZX). The only two quasiparticle states predicted below 1.5 MeV have spins 4- and 7-; 4- more likely based on configuration and predicted energy 1.07 MeV in agreement with the observed energy 
T$from |g(t) (2016Id02, 2015TaZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
CONF$|n1/2[521] ~# |n7/2[633] 
J$based on coin relations and decay pattern; K|p=(4-) (2016Id02, 2015TaZX). The only two quasiparticle states predicted below 1.5 MeV have spins 4- and 7-; 4- more likely based on configuration and predicted energy 1.07 MeV in agreement with the observed energy 
T$from |g(t) (2016Id02, 2015TaZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. T{-1/2}=0.215 s {I76} is reported in 2017Wu04. 
CONF$|n1/2[521] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
$ Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=3.0 nb {I17} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron emission 
T$From 2017Wu04, by fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. Data analysis included contributions from parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=277 ms and %|b{+-}n=0.2 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=224 ms and %|b{+-}n=0.5 (2016Ma12) 
$68 counts assigned to {+162}Nd for spectrometer settings on Pr, and 15 counts for settings on Gd (2018Fu08) 
$Production |s=89 pb {I17} for Pr settings and 21 pb {I+7-6} for Gd settings, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=151.1 ms, %|b{+-}n=6 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=159.5 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.1 (2016Ma12) 
$A total of three counts were assigned to {+163}Nd for spectrometer setting on Pr, and none for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=3.5 pb {I+81-29} for Pr setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s value (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
J$5/2- from |W{-|n}=5/2- orbital proposed in 2019Mo01 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight of 550 ns given in 2018Fu08. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical values of 151.1 ms (2019Mo01) and 159.5 ms (2016Ma12). From a general decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number, T{-1/2} for {+163}Nd is expected to be <0.3 s, based on measured half-lives of 0.44 ms for {+160}Nd, 0.22 s for {+161}Nd, and 0.31 s {I20} for {+162}Nd, available in literature. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5,6,7
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$|b-delayed proton precursor. Proton emission and Nd-K| x ray from experiments in 174-MeV {+36}Ar on {+96}Ru were measured by 1999Xu05, 2005Xu04. The measured mean-energy of proton is 3.8 MeV. Others: 1997La27 and 1993Li40 reported no evidence of delayed-protons 
T$from multiscaling of |g gated with p and Nd-K| x ray (1999Xu05,2005Xu04) 
J$from |bp energy spectra and branching ratios (2005Xu04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$No delayed-proton activity has been reported. 
T$from timing of 99|g assigned to the decay of {+129}Pm to {+129}Nd (2004Xu05) 
J$possible |p5/2[532] orbital (2004Xu05). 5/2- proposed in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5,6)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$possible |b{++} feeding of 4+ and/or 6+ states and no |b{++} feeding of 2+ state in {+130}Nd 
T$from 1999Xi03. Other: 2.2 s {I+6-4} (1985Wi07) 
Delayed proton emitter 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$From systematics of neighboring odd-A g.s. and decay scheme of {+131}Pm (1999Ga41) 
T$From 1999Ga41 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ %|ep: from thesis by P.A. Wilmarth (U.C., Berkeley (1988), also Rept. LBL-26101). E(p)=2.2-5.0 MeV. 
J$ direct |b feeding to 2+ and 4+ 
T$ weighted average of 4 s {I2} (1977Bo02), 5.0 s {I7} (1985Wi07), 5.0 s {I10} (1988BeYG), 6.3 s {I4} (1989McZU), 8.8 s {I8} (1990Ko25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from direct feeding of low-spin (3/2,5/2) states in {+133}Nd, following %|e+%|b{++} decay; systematics of structures in neighboring Pm nuclei. The properties of rotational band associated with this state support the proposed |p3/2[411] (d{-5/2}) configuration assignment and, hence, J|p=3/2+ to the band-head 
T$weighted average of 15 s {I3} (1995Br21) and 12 s {I3} (1977Bo02) 
CONF$|p3/2[411] (d{-5/2}). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$Although, no |g-rays were identified to depopulate this level, the level energy is obtained from the least-square fitting procedure due to connections between the |p3/2[411] and |p3/[541] bands using 643, 723 and 698 keV transitions 
J$from population of high-spin (9/2,11/2) states in {+133}Nd, following %|e+%|b{++} decay; systematics in neighboring odd-Z nuclei 
T$Value deduced from B(E3)(W.u.)=0.137 {I8} from decay of a similar isomer in the N=72 isotone {+131}Pr and |a=2927 {I284} (from BrIcc) 
CONF$|p3/2[541] (h{-11/2}), strongly Coriolis mixed 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$This state may not necessarily be the g.s., since the experiment is not sensitive to isomeric decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
No IT decay observed 
J |e decay to 4+, 6+; systematics 
T weighted average of 24 s {I2} (1977Bo02), 21 s {I1} (1988BeYG), and 23 s {I2} (1990Ko25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level may Be the ground state of {+135}Pm 
J$from |e feeding (1989Vi04,1989Ko07) of low-spin states in {+135}Nd and from systematics of neighboring odd Pm and Pr nuclides (as shown in figure 3 of 1993BrZU) 
1989Vi04 proposed population of two isomers of J|p=(3/2,5/2+) and (9/2-,11/2-) from the decay of {+135}Sm, with the level scheme of {+135}Pm based mainly on the decay of the high-spin isomer. But a single low-spin activity is suggested by the following discussion: 
1. High-spin assignments made by 1989Vi04 to low lying levels populated by {+135}Sm decay were based, presumably, on the identification of one common |g ray at 286 keV in {+135}Sm decay and in high-spin studies on {+135}Pm (1987Be22,1988Wa01). From |g|g evidence, 1989Vi04 proposed that 286|g deexcites a level at 341 keV. Three other |g rays at 160, 237 and 341 keV also deexcited this level. In the in-beam |g study (1987Be22,1988Wa01) there is no evidence in the |g|g spectra (figure 3 in 1987Be22 and figure 1 in 1988Wa01) for the existence of either the strong 237|g or the weaker (but likely to be seen by 1988Wa01 and 1987Be22) 341|g. It should also be noted that E|g=285.9 {I2} (1989Vi04) in {+135}Sm decay does not agree with 286.8 {I1} (1987Be22) in in-beam study, although 1988Wa01 report 286.2 {I2}. The |g-ray energies reported by 1988Wa01 are systematically lower by |?1 keV as compared to those in 1987Be22. Based on the |g|g evidence and |g-ray energies, the evaluators suggest that either the placement of 286|g is incorrect in {+135}Sm decay (1989Vi04) or that it is independent of the 286 |g seen in the in-beam studies. 
2. In high-spin studies, the low lying states are proposed as 3/2+ and 7/2+ from band structures and cranked shell-model calculations (1987Mu12,1989MuZR,1996MuZZ). From these studies, there seems no evidence for a long-lived 9/2- or 11/2- isomer. A low-lying level 9/2- level is proposed with T{-1/2}=7 to 35 ns. 
3. 1989Vi04 report a single half-life for delayed protons, |g rays and x rays, indicating the existence of only one 10.3 s {+135}Sm activity. 
T$from I|g as a function of time. Weighted average of 49 s {I3} (1989Ko07) and 45 s {I10} (1989Vi04). Others (composite for both isomers): 44 s {I9} (1975Va14), 55 s {I10} (1977Bo02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level may correspond to 0+x level but no experimental evidence exists to confirm this. In case it is the same as the 0+x level, then it may also correspond to the g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (+)
level_comment:
J$1989Vi04 proposed 11/2-, but see comment for 0.0+y level. From syst 1993BrZU suggested 5/2+. (M1,E2) |g to (3/2+,5/2+) suggests positive parity 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E$systematics (see figure 3 in 1993BrZU) suggest 11/2- as g.s. However, experimental evidence is lacking, as to which of the two activities corresponds to the ground state. See also comment for the 49-s isomer labeled 0.0+x. If 0+x is the ground state, then (11/2-) state may be at an absolute energy of 68.7 keV. 2003Au03 give 50 {I100} from systematics. 
T$from timing of |g rays. Average of 49 s {I3} (1989Vi04) and 40 s {I3} (1989Ko07). Others (for both isomers): 44 s {I9} (1975Va14), 55 s {I10} (1977Bo02) 
J$from systematics (1993BrZU) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
J$1989Vi04 proposed (9/2- to 13/2-), but see comment for 0.0+y level. From syst 1993BrZU suggested 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$levels in the range 4000-7000 (1989Vi04) fed by {+135}Sm |b decay which deexcite by delayed protons 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$it is assumed by the evaluators that the |e decay of {+135}Sm populates a low spin isomer in {+135}Pm as opposed to an 11/2- state suggested by 1989Vi04. See comments above for the level table 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (+)
level_comment:
J$1989Vi04 proposed 11/2-, but see comment for 0.0+y level in 'adopted levels'. From systematics, 1993BrZU suggested 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
J$1989Vi04 proposed (9/2- to 13/2-), but see comment for 0.0+y level in 'adopted levels'. From systematics, 1993BrZU suggested 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
J$1989Vi04 proposed (13/2-), but see comment for 0.0+y level in 'adopted levels'. From systematics, 1993BrZU suggested 7/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_comment:
This was assigned (1987Be22) as the 39/2- member of the yrast band but 1988Wa01 propose this member at 4759 deexciting by 898|g (see adopted levels) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (2)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J$2+ is suggested by 1989Vi04 based on observation of large population of 2+ and 3+ levels in |e+|b{++} decay to {+136}Nd; (2-,3) is suggested by 1988Ke03 based on observed feeding to 4+ levels and 2+ levels in |e+|b{++} decay to {+136}Nd. Since log| {Ift} values were not extracted, these assignments should be considered very tentative. The J=2 assignment is favored, assuming a spin difference of 3 or larger is necessary to produce the existence of two |b decaying levels. 
T$from 1988Ke03 using 489|g(t) and 862|g(t); note that 1988Ke03 state that their value is poorly defined due to the short (75 s) collection time. Other: 1989Vi04 give 30 s<T{-1/2}<150 s with lower limit based on 374|g(t) and upper limit from estimated allowed |b transitions to 2+ and 3+ levels in {+136}Nd. 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
J$level not seen in |e decay of {+136}Sm g.s. It decays with log| {Ift} of |?6.2 and |?6.5 to 6+ and 4+ states in {+136}Nd, respectively. Tentative negative parity from the assignment to the |nh11/2~#|p5/2[413] configuration by 1987Be50. The |nh11/2~#|p1/2[550] configuration is also possible, which would change the parity of the band to positive. 
T$from |g(t) in {+136}Pm |b{++} decay (1973PaZV) 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from implant-|g(t) in (HI,xn|g) using the 42.7|g 
J$from systematics of the |ph{-11/2}|nh{-11/2} band in doubly-odd La, Pr, Pm and Eu nuclei (1996Li13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T from 1975No08. Other: 7 min {I+5-4} (1973WeZK) 
J |e decay to 9/2- and 13/2- in {+137}Nd levels with log| {Ift}|?5.7 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$this isomer was not observed by 2000Be42 and as a consequence, its existence needs further proof 
J$systematics of structures in neighboring even Pm; 1+ also proposed in 1983GaZT. 
T$from 1983Al06 
$Q(|e)=7090 {I100} (1983Al06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$20 {I100} from observed |b decay energy difference, between Q(|e)(2000Be42)=7105 {I19} and Q(|e)(1983Al06)=7090 {I100}. Note that 2000Be42 did not observe the 10 s level and thus this 3.24 min level observed in 2000Be42 could also be the g.s. of {+138}Pm. E=30 {I30} is suggested in 2017Au03 (NUBASE-16) based on |b decay energies 
J$411.0|g Q from (7-); systematics of structures in neighboring even mass Pm. But (3+) proposed in 1973VaYZ and 1981De38 is inconsistent in the {+138}Pm |e decay scheme 
T$from 1981De38; other: 3.5 min {I3} (1973VaYZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
J$predicted from shell-model calculations; band head of the |ph{-11/2}|n1/2[400] band; 177.4|g D+Q to (6-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$proposed in 1990Be28 in {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g) based on systematics of neighbouring nuclei 
T$from |g(t) in 1990Be28 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
J$352.2|g D+Q to (7-), 435.4|g D to (6-), band member. Note: J|p=8- assigned by 1990Be28 in {+116}Cd({+27}Al,5n|g) is inconsistent with 435.4|g D to (6-), and their J|p values of other member states in the same band differ from adopted ones by one or two units. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (12-)
level_comment:
E,J$from band assignment in {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) (2015Li15). 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) consider a level at E=2496+x as the (12-) band member feeding the 2097+x, J|p=(11-) level by the 398.8|g, which however placed differently by 2015Li15. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13-)
level_comment:
J$tentative assignment by 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g). 241.3|g to (12-), 1010.4|g to (11-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (15+)
level_comment:
E,J$band assignment in {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) (2015Li15). 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) assign this (15+) band member at a 3688+x level, feeding the 3004+x level by a 684.0|g which is not observed by 2015Li15. The evaluator has adopted this band assignment by 2015Li15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (18+)
level_comment:
E$1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) assign this (18+) band head at a 4579+x level, feeding the 3852+x level by a 726.6|g and fed by a 554.6|g from the 5133 level. 2015Li15 in {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) have placed the 554.6|g+726.6|g cascade in reversed order, making a level at 4407+x. The evaluator has adopted this band assignment by 2015Li15 
J$554.7|g Q to (16+), band assignment in {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) (2015Li15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (17+)
level_comment:
E,J$band assignment in {+124}Te({+19}F,5n|g) (2015Li15). 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) assign this (17+) band member at a 4538+x level, feeding a level at E=3688+x by a 850|g which is not observed by 2015Li15. The evaluator has adopted this band assignment by 2015Li15 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (20+)
level_comment:
E$See comments for 4407+x level 
J$726.6|g to (18+), band member. Other: (19+) assigned by 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_comment:
J$(21+) assigned by 1998Pr04 in {+115}In({+28}Si,2p3n|g) based on the assignments of J|p=(20+) and (19+) for 5995+x and 5133+x levels, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$This level may be the ground state of {+138}Pm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$30 {I30} suggested in 2017Au03 (NUBASE-16) based on |b decay energies; could be the g.s. of {+138}Pm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J$allowed |e decay to 3/2+. 5/2+ from systematics of Z=61, N<86 nuclei 
T$from 1977De06 (|g's). Other: 4.0 min {I2} (1968Bl14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to (5/2)+. 
T$from 10.7-s |e decay. 
$Upper limit for %|e+%|b{++} deduced from systematics of log| {Ift} values in 1998Si17: for |DJ=0, |D|p=no, centroid log| {Ift}=6.1 with a width of 0.9 for 352 cases of odd-A nuclei. Minimum log| {Ift}=4.1 for such transitions gives %|e+%|b{++}<0.7 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,7/2+)
level_comment:
J$|>5/2 from lack of direct |e feeding from (1/2+). Probably 5/2,7/2 since the level is fed by |g's from other low-spin levels. |p=+ from syst of N=78 nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2-)
level_comment:
E$level reported at 778.9 keV in 1987Xu01 and 2009Dh01 with reversed ordering of the 590-597 |g cascade 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)-
level_comment:
J |g to 1+ is E1, the lowest J for negative parity shell-model state in Z=61, N=79 nuclei is two-particle configuration=((|n h{-11/2})(|p g{-7/2})) (1993De40) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E x=431 {I28} (difference in mass excesses for 9.2-s g.s. and 5.95-min isomer of {+140}Pm, 2017Au03 and references therein) 
T from 1975Ke09. Others: 6 min {I1} (1966At04), 5.80 min {I5} (1967Bl27), 5.8 min {I3} (1973VaYZ), 5.9 min {I6} (1974FiZF), 5.6 min {I2} (1975Za10) 
J$8- assignment based on 1993De40, which removed 7- (1987Pe07): log| {Ift}=5.2 to 7- (|n h11/2)(|n d3/2) daughter state and deduced (|p d5/2)(|n h11/2) parent configuration (the only allowed transition is |p d5/2 to |n d3/2 >), of which only the 8- coupling can feed mainly the 7- daughter. The 7- coupling of the parent state should proceed predominantly to 6- (|n h11/2)(|n d3/2) daughter state and the 7- daughter state should receive much weaker population, which removes 7-. The 7- was previously assigned based on log| {Ift}=7.3 to 6+ whose weak population (I(|e+|b{++})=0.5%) could more likely arise from preferably E1 transitions from unobserved higher-lying 7- states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 11(-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level resulting from inverted order of trasitions from 2097+x: 495|g-795|g in (HI,xn|g) (1993De40) with this intermediary level, or 795|g-495|g in ({+19}F,5n|g) (2010Wa37), which was adopted by evaluator 
J$E2 |g to 9(-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (16-)
level_comment:
J$assigned by 2010Wa37 in ({+19}F,5n|g) dataset from E2 535|g from 18(-) and 221|g to 16(-). As 2010Wa37 do not show proof of the E2 character other possible values are not excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 19(-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level not confirmed in ({+19}F,5n|g) dataset; 895|g decaying from this level in (HI,xn|g) might have been replaced at 3887 level in ({+19}F,5n|g) dataset 
J$E2 |g to 17(-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (21-)
level_comment:
J$assigned by 2010Wa37 in ({+19}F,5n|g) dataset from E2 922|g to 19(-). As 2010Wa37 do not show proof of the E2 character other possible values are not excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$ x=431 {I28} from Adopted Levels 
T$ from Adopted Levels 
$ Configuration=|pd{-5/2}~#|n{-11/2} (1993De40) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), log| {Ift}=5.4 to 3/2+ 
T from 1967Bl27. Other: 20.9 min {I2} (1975Ya04), see 1959Gr98, 1952Ki25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)+
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is E2, excitation function in (p,2n|g), log| {Ift}=5.8 via 1/2+ parent; 3/2+ cannot be excluded 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is E3 
T from (|a,4n|g) (1985Ar19). Others: 0.583 |ms {I23} (1975Bu10), 0.59 |ms {I2} (1980Pi03), 0.70 |ms {I2} (1971WaZO), 0.218 |ms {I9} (1970ArZQ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J |g to 7/2+ is |DJ=2 E2; log| {Ift}=6.8 via 11/2- parent 
T from (p,2n|g), ({+3}He,3n|g); disagrees with T{-1/2}=56 ns {I11} from |e decay of {+141}Sm (11/2-) (1970ArZQ): B(E2)(W.u.)=8|*10{+-4} for T{-1/2}=56 ns is an unreasonably small value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is |DJ=1, D+Q, |g to 7/2+ may be |DJ=0, Q+D. Significant |d (not given) more likely is compatible with M1+E2 than with E1+M2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is |DJ=1, (D+Q); |g to 7/2+ may be |DJ=0, D+Q. Significant |d (not given) more likely is compatible with M1+E2 than with E1+M2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level resulting from the placement of 1068|g+260|g cascade in between 2641 and 1313 levels in ({+3}He,3n|g) and (|a,4n|g); the reversed order proposed in ({+19}F,4n|g) and ({+12}C,4n|g) was adopted 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$mentioned by authors as half-life on page 8, but as mean lifetime on page 17 in their paper. Comparison of lifetime of 822 level in {+139}Pr measured by the authors suggests that the value of 54 ns is half-life, not mean life. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) of 381|g, 639|g and 882|g 
E$energy of this level not well established, decaying 44|g observed in previous work of the same group (see |g table) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T for neutral atom, from 1970Ar17; others: 40.5 s {I10} (1968Bl14), 40 s {I3} (1973Ra01) 
T 56 s {i3} for {+142}Pm{+61+} 2009Wi09 
T (|b{++}+|e)=39.2 s {i6} {+142}Pm{+60+} 2009Wi09 
T (|b{++})=55.0 s {i13} {+142}Pm{+60+} 2009Wi09 
T (|e)=135.9 s {i27} {+142}Pm{+60+} 2009Wi09 
T (|b{++}+|e)=39.6 s {i14} {+142}Pm{+59+} 2009Wi09 
T (|b{++})=49.9 s {i22} {+142}Pm{+59+} 2009Wi09 
T (|e)=193 s {i5} {+142}Pm{+59+} 2009Wi09 
T %|e/(%|e+%|b{++})=20.2 % {i10} {+142}Pm{+59+} 2009Wi09 
T 40.7 s {I+24-20} {+142}Pm{+60+} 2008Ve06 
J log| {Ift}|<5.3 to 0+ and 2+ Suggested earlier as 1+ in 1970Ha29 from strong beta decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8)-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T from (d,2n|g) (1976Fu07); others: 2.20 ms (1972Ra42) (|a,3n|g), 2.36 ms (1971Go21) (|a,3n|g), 2.2 ms {I2} (1974KeZE,1975KeZN) (|a,3n|g), (p,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,J$From figure 3 of 2004Li49; not listed in authors' table I. 
T$From 2002Bh02, except for the g.s. which is the adopted value. 
E$From least-squares fit to E|g's 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$2004Li49 assigned this level as the 67 |ms isomer, based upon the absence of any strong coincidence between the |g-rays below and above this level. This isomer was placed at 926.2 earlier based on (|a,3n|g) and ({+10}B,4n|g) (1975KeZN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
T observed by 1975KeZN, 1974KeZE only in (|a,3n|g) (E=25-55 MeV) and ({+10}B,4n|g). Not observed in (d,2n) or (p,n), (p,2n) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$2004Li49 assign this level as the 67 |ms isomer, based upon the absence of any strong coincidence between the |g-rays below and above this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$from the decay constant=0.0126 s{+-} {I7} by automatic analysis using a single-exponential decay function (2019Oz03). Other: 49 s {I3} from the decay constant=0.0141 s{+-} {I7} by manual analysis (2019Oz03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T weighted average: 265 d {I15} (1960Fu05), 265 d {I10} (1963Pa21), 267 d {I15} (1964Bu13) 
J L=2 in (d,{+3}He); |g from L=4 to L=2 level (in (d,{+3}He)) is M1+(E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average from 24.0 ns {I10} (|a,2n|g) (1980Pr02) and 24.0 ns {I10} (p,2n|g) (1981Ko16); also T{-1/2}=24.4 ns {I14} (|a,2n|g) (1975Fr18) 
J L=5 in ({+3}He,d), 959|g is E3 
MOMM1 Other: +6.3 {I5} (1980Pr02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=5.9 via 3/2+ parent, |g to 5/2+ is M1+E2, J|p=5/2+ favored by shell model and MQPM calculations (1998Su03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_comment:
J |g to 5/2+ is |DJ=2, (E2), |g to 7/2+ is |DJ=1, E2+M1 
E,J on the basis of differences in excit 1980Pr02 introduce 2 levels: 1565.8 (5/2+) and 1566.0 (9/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 11.0 ns {I7} from (|a,2n|g) (1980Pr02) and 10.3 ns {I5} from (p,2n|g) (1981Ko16). T{-1/2}=15.6 ns {I23} (2002Bh02). 
MOMM1 Other: +7.50 {I53} (1980Pr02) 
J |g to 11/2+ is |DJ=2, E2; excit 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2-
level_comment:
J |g to 11/2+ is |DJ=1, E1 (from |a(K)exp); no |g to J<11/2 (p,2n|g); 1980Pr02 in (|a,2n|g) find that from |g(|q) and pol the 287.3|g is M1+(E2) and therefore J|p=13/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
%|b{++}|<7.4|*10{+-6} from 511 keV-511 keV-697 keV gammasphere measurement (1998Za03) 
T weighted average: 377 d {I16} (1963Pa21), 349 d {I16} (1964Bu13) 
J log| {If{+1u}t}<8.5 for |e to 4(+), 6+ levels in {+144}Nd; L(p)=2 in proton-transfer reactions, target J|p=7/2- (1976Ma27) 
$|m=1.69 {I14} (1989Ra17), Static Nuclear Orientation technique. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9)+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$configuration=(|n 2f{-7/2})+(|P,1h11/2). This parallel-coupling isomer has been also observed in other N=83 nuclei like {+146}Eu and {+148}Tb. M2 |g (326 keV) to (7)- and E3 |g (669 keV) to (6)- 
T$from 1993Mu03. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$the same level is given 2 different values of energy: 7975 and 7973 keV, the average is taken here. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=4 in ({+3}He,d), |g to 5/2+ is M1+E2. Configuration=(|p g{-7/2}) 
T from {+145}Sm |e decay. Other: 2.5 ns {I3} (p,2n|g) (1980Ko16) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J |DJ=1, M1+E2 |g from 669.7 to 5/2+, M1+E2 |g from 1101 to 11/2- and a |DJ=1, E1 |g connecting 1101 and 669.7 levels uniquely establish J|p(669.7)=7/2+ and J|p(1101)=9/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 16.3 ns {I15} (1980Ko16) and 18.3 ns {I19} (1976Sh05) in (p,xn|g), 17 ns {I2} (1996Ur03) 
J |g to 7/2+ is M2, L=5 in ({+3}He,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J |DJ=1, M1+E2 |g from 1207 level to 9/2+, |DJ=2, E2 |g from 1397 to 9/2+, and a |DJ=1, M1 |g connecting the 1397 and 1207 levels are consistent with J|p(1207):J|p(1397)=7/2+:5/2+ or 11/2+:13/2+. The absence of feeding from either level to levels with J<7/2 rules out the first alternative 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T weighted average of 2.69 ns {I9} (1967Ba22), 2.61 ns {I10} (1967My01), 2.6 ns {I2} (1959Br65), 2.7 ns {I2} (1962Be31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
%B-,%EC$from I|g=34.6% {I15} for 747.2 keV, E2 transition, see {+146}Pm |b{+-} decay; weighted average of 34.7 {I18} (1966Bu03), 37.0 {I55} (1968Ta09), 33.3 {I35} (1970Av03) assuming (I(|g+ce)747.2, {+146}Sm+I(|g+ce)453.8, {+146}Nd)=100% and no |b{+-} and (|e+|b{++}) feedings to {+146}Sm(g.s.) and {+146}Nd(g.s.) correspondingly. Other: %|b{+-}=34.0 {I13}, %|e=66.0% {I13} (1997Pe22, 2012Au07). 
T$from |g(t) and |b(t), T{-1/2}=5.53 y {I5} or 2020 d {I18} (1967Bu12); see 2012Au07. Other: 1600 d {I80} (1963Pa21), 2019.83 d (2014Le18). 
J$from |b|g(|q) (1974Dr08), shape factor of |b{+-}-spectrum (1974Sc06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: [4-,5-]
level_comment:
J$from most possible depopulation of 33.3 keV, J=(6-) level to g.s., J=3- through the 17.2 keV level (J=3 or J=6 are unlikely) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
J$from a comparison of the level scheme of {+146}Pm with level schemes of isotones {+148}Eu and {+150}Tb (1995Rz02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$measured by optical spectroscopy (1966Re04). Q=+0.7 {I2} in 1966Re04 revised by 2008Py02 and adopted in 2016St14 evaluation. Corrections are discussed in 1964Bl22. Others: Q=0.59 {I15} (1966Re04, atomic beam); |m=3.2 {I3}, Q=0.7 {I3} (1963Bu14, atomic beam); 1992Al03 measured hyperfine structure constants using collinear laser spectroscopy, and moment ratios: g({+145}Pm g.s.)/g({+147}Pm g.s.)=2.0208 {I51}; and Q({+145}Pm g.s.)/Q({+147}Pm g.s.)=0.31 {I6} (1992Al03) 
J$spin from atomic beam (1960Ca03,1963Bu14) and optical (1960Kl02) measurements, parity from L({+3}He,d)=4. Configuration=fragment of |pg{-7/2} orbital 
T$weighted average of 2.62346 y {I27} (1999Po32, |g-decay curve, 95% confidence level, uncertainty tripled for 1|s in averaging procedure, as no details of this measurement are provided); 2.62 y {I1} (1968Re04, 2|p proportional counter, 1.9 half-lives, previous value from this group using the same method was 2.50 y {I3} in 1961Wy01); 2.62343 y {I36} (1967Jo07, calorimetry, |?0.5 half-life, 95% confidence level, uncertainty doubled for 1|s in averaging procedure, previous value from this lab using the same method was 2.6226 y {I20} in 1965Ei04); 2.620 y {I5} (1965Wh04, calorimetry, |?0.4 half-life, previous value from this group was 2.67 y {I6} in 1963Ro20); 2.618 y {I7} (1965An07, 4|p|b proportional counter, 0.5 half-life); 2.60 y {I2} (1965Fl02, 2|p proportional counter, 1.8 half-lives); 2.7 y {I1} (1959Ca12); 2.64 y {I2} (1957Me47, 4|p|b proportional counter, 1.5 half-lives); 2.66 y {I2} (1956Sc87, proportional counter, 1.8 half-lives); 2.52 y {I8} (1955Me52, mass spectrometry) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$Mossbauer spectroscopy (1970Ba39, also 1970NoZW) using g-factor(91.1 level)/g-factor(g.s.)=1.925 {I4}. Others: +3.22 {I16} (1980Ne07, TDPAC using {+147}Nd source); 3.8 {I6} from IPAC and 3.4 {I10} from DPAC (1976Si08), 3.9 {I7} (1972Si49, IPAC) 
MOME2$from measured Q(91.1 level)/Q(g.s.)=0.8 {I4} (1970Ba39, also 1970NoZW), Mossbauer spectroscopy. Note that this value is listed in 1989Ra17 compilation, but not in 2016St14 and 2021StZZ evaluations 
J$L({+3}He,d)=2; M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ g.s. Configuration=fragment of |pd{-5/2} orbital 
T$from |b|g(t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay, weighted average of several measurements. Other: 2.6 ns {I2} from |g|g(t) in (p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 5/2+, 91; E2 |g to 7/2+ g.s. Combined analysis of |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) for 276|g and 410|g data gives best possible choice of 3/2 for 410 level and 5/2 for 686 level in |b{+-} decay (1977Al34) 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay (1975Si01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 5/2+, 91; analysis of 440|g(|q,H,t) data by 1977Al34 in |b{+-} decay. Configuration=fragment of |pd{-5/2} orbital 
T$from |b|g(t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay, weighted average of 0.083 ns {I15} (1967Ra20) and 0.133 ns {I30} (1971Si20). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L=5 in {+146}Nd({+3}He,d); M2 |g to 7/2+ g.s.; |ph{-11/2} excitation in weakly deformed {+147}Pm; systematics of h{-11/2} isomers in odd-A Pm nuclei: 26 ns in {+143}Pm at 960 keV, 18 ns in {+145}Pm at 795 keV, 35 |ms in {+149}Pm at 496 keV 
T$from |g|g(t) in {+136}Xe({+15}N,4n|g) (1995Ur01). Other: 12 ns {I2} from |g|g(t) in (p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |gs to 7/2+, g.s., and 9/2+, 408; |b feeding from 5/2- parent not first-forbidden unique from log| {Ift} value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |gs to 7/2+, g.s. and 5/2+, 91; L({+3}He,d)=(2) and possible d{-5/2} orbital. Combined analysis of |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) for 276|g and 410|g data gives best possible choice of 3/2 for 410 level and 5/2 for 686 level in |b{+-} decay (1977Al34). Configuration=fragment of |pd{-5/2} orbital 
T$from |b|g(t) in {+147}Nd |b{+-} decay (1971Si20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
E,J$L({+3}He,d)=(2) suggests it is a different level from 730.7 level which from (d,3n|g) results seems to be higher spin 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 17/2-
level_comment:
J$|DJ=1, M1+E2 |g to 15/2-, 1406; |DJ=1, E1 |g to 15/2+, 1393; |DJ=(2), (Q) |g to 13/2-; band member 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,J$doublet at 1820 keV with L=1+2 in (d,{+3}He) giving 1/2-,3/2- for one component and 3/2+,5/2+ for the other 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$5/2 excluded by A{-2} and |b{-2} coefficients obtained in |g(|q,H) and |g|g(|q), respectively, for 197|g feeding (1977Al34) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$consistent with |g-decay properties, half-life, and syst 
E$11/2- isomer syst: 26-ns {+143}Pm at 960 keV, 18-ns {+145}Pm at 795 keV, 35-|ms {+149}Pm at 496 keV 
T$12 ns {I2} (1977Ko24) 408|g(t), 649|g(t) pulsed beam 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$1979Do06 analyzed a 640 group, deduced L=(2+4) and C{+2}S=0.6 for L=2, d{-3/2} or d{-5/2} orbital, 3.5 for L=4, g{-7/2} orbital and 1.6 for L=4, g{-9/2} orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$1979Do06 analyzed a 1320 group, deduced L=2 and C{+2}S=0.33 for L=2, d{-3/2} or d{-5/2} orbital, 0.27 for L=2, d{-5/2} orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$1979Do06 analyzed a 1560 group, deduced L=(2+4) and C{+2}S=0.1 for L=2, d{-3/2} or d{-5/2} orbital, 0.08 for L=4, g{-7/2} orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
E,L,S$from 1979Do06. Spectroscopic factor is for g{-9/2} orbital, for less likely g{-7/2} orbital, authors give 17. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
J$spin from atomic beam (1960Ca03,1963Bu14) and optical (1960Kl02) measurements, parity from L({+3}He,d)=L(d,{+3}He)=4 (1979St01,1981Le21), both from 0+ targets 
T$weighted average of 2.62346 y {I27} (1999Po32, |g-decay curve, 95% confidence level, uncertainty tripled for 1|s in averaging procedure, as no details of this measurement are provided); 2.62 y {I1} (1968Re04, 2|p proportional counter, 1.9 half-lives, previous value from this group using the same method was 2.50 y {I3} in 1961Wy01); 2.62343 y {I36} (1967Jo07, calorimetry, |?0.5 half-life, 95% confidence level, uncertainty doubled for 1|s in averaging procedure, previous value from this lab using the same method was 2.6226 y {I20} in 1965Ei04); 2.620 y {I5} (1965Wh04, calorimetry, |?0.4 half-life, previous value from this group was 2.67 y {I6} in 1963Ro20); 2.618 y {I7} (1965An07, 4|p|b proportional counter, 0.5 half-life); 2.60 y {I2} (1965Fl02, 2|p proportional counter, 1.8 half-lives); 2.7 y {I1} (1959Ca12); 2.64 y {I2} (1957Me47, 4|p|b proportional counter, 1.5 half-lives); 2.66 y {I2} (1956Sc87, proportional counter, 1.8 half-lives); 2.52 y {I8} (1955Me52, mass spectrometry) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$Measured |m=+3.22 {I16} (1980Ne07, DPAC method). Measured g factor=+1.52 {I23} (IPAC), +1.37 {I40} (DPAC) (1976Si08); 1.57 {I29} (1972Si49, IPAC) 
J$L({+3}He,d)=L(d,{+3}He)=2 (1979St01,1981Le21), both from 0+ targets; M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ g.s. Configuration: fragment of |pd{-5/2} orbital 
T$unweighted average of values from |b|g(t) data: 2.44 ns {I8} (1953Gr07), 2.45 ns {I20} (1960We06), 2.59 ns {I2} (1962Be27), 2.49 ns {I12} (1965Ay03), 2.34 ns {I4} (1966Be42), 2.51 ns {I5} (1967Ba22), 2.46 ns {I7} (1967Ra20), 2.58 ns {I2} (1971Si20), 2.48 ns {I2} (1976Si08); and |g|g(t) data: 2.50 ns {I6} (1960Bo17), 2.48 ns {I4} (1962Ri07), 2.56 ns {I3} (1971Si20), 2.51 ns {I9} (1972Si49), 2.47 ns {I5} (1976Si08), 2.6 ns {I2} (1977Ko24, |g(t) in (p,2n|g), 2.66 ns {I6} (1980Ne07). Weighted average is 2.53 ns {I2}, but with reduced |h{+2}=3.7 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.7. 
$(804|b)(91|g)(|q): 1973Su05, 1971Ya12, 1966Be09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ g.s.; 241|g E1 from 11/2-, 649 level (in (p,2n|g), 1977Ko24) and {+136}Xe({+15}N,4n|g) (1995Ur01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 5/2+, 91 level; E2 |g to 7/2+ g.s. Combined analysis of |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) for 276|g and 410|g data gives best possible choice of 3/2 for 410 level and 5/2 for 686 level 
T$from (275|g)(319|g)(t) (1975Si01). Others: <0.7 ns (1960We06, |b|g(t)), <0.5 ns (1960Bo17, |g|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 5/2+, 91 level; M1(+E2) |g to 7/2+ g.s.; M2 |g from 11/2-, 649 level in (p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) and {+136}Xe({+15}N,4n|g) (1995Ur01). 7/2 is assigned by 1977Al34 based on combined analysis of |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) data, which rule out 3/2 and 5/2. Other: 5/2 or 7/2 (1969Ba32,1961We07) based on |g(|q,H), and |d(197|g,398|g) from |a(K)exp and L-subshell ratios. Configuration: fragment of |pg{-7/2} orbital 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |gs to 5/2+, 91 level and to 3/2+, 410 level; 5/2+ from analysis of 440|g(|q,H,t) data by 1977Al34. Configuration: fragment of |pd{-5/2} orbital 
T$from difference in centroids of delayed |b|g spectrum for {+147}Nd and prompt |b|g spectrum from {+60}Co source. Value is weighted average of 0.083 ns {I15} (1967Ra20) and 0.133 ns {I30} (1971Si20). Others: |<0.10 ns (1976Si08, |b(531|g)(t)), <0.6 ns (1960We06, |b|g(t)), |<0.4 ns (1957Kn35, |b|g(t)) 
$(364|b)(531|g)(|q) (1973Su05,1966Be09) 
$(364|b)(CP 531|g)(|q) (1961Pe10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
$Level population in {+147}Nd decay reported by 1983Li19 only. Level known from {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) work of 1977Ko24 
J$|DJ=1, M1(+E2) |g to 410.5, 3/2+ level in (p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |gs to 7/2+, g.s., and 9/2+, 408 level; |b feeding from 5/2- parent not first-forbidden unique from log| {Ift} value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |gs to 7/2+, g.s. and 5/2+, 91 level; L({+3}He,d)=(2) and possible d{-5/2} orbital. Combined analysis of |g|g(|q) and |g(|q,H,t) for 276|g and 410|g data gives best possible choice of 3/2 for 410 level and 5/2 for 686 level (1977Al34). Configuration: fragment of |pd{-5/2} orbital 
T$from |b(686|g)(t) (1971Si20). Other: <0.8 ns (1960We06, |b|g(t)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
$Level population in {+147}Nd decay proposed in 1983Li19. This level is known from {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 
J$E1 |gs to 91, 5/2+ level and g.s., 7/2+ from {+148}Nd(p,2n|g) (1977Ko24) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$L=4 from |s(|q) in ({+3}He,d), but L=5 consistent with (11/2-) assignment 
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=25 (25|'), 21 (50|') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$for L=0+5, J|p=1/2+ and 11/2- 
E,S$645 peak analyzed as a doublet with L=0+5, assuming the same contributions from s{-1/2} and h{-11/2} as in (t,|a) for {+149}Pm 
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=308 (30|'), 214 (40|') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T weighted average of: 5.370 d {I9} (1970Ca09), 5.364 d {I15} and 5.365 d {I20} (1971Ca23). Others: 5.37 d {I4} (1971Mo04), 5.39 d {I6} (1962Re03) 
J J=1 from atomic-beam magnetic resonance (1976Fu06,1965Al10), |p=- from the observed shape of the |b{+-} spectrum and log| {Ift} (1963Ba06). This assignment is confirmed by the shape of the |b{+-} spectrum and |b-|g(|q) (1963Ba31) and (e,e'p) data (1971Sh08). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-,6-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T from 1971Wa05. Others: 41.4 d {I8} (1971BaZW), 40.9 d {I2} (1971Mo04), 40.6 d {I4} (1962Re03) 
J J=5,6,7 from log| {Ift} to 6+ 2194.5-keV level; not 7 and |p=- from E4 to 75.7 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-,6-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
%IT=4.2 {I6}; derived from 4.6 {I5} (1971Mo04) after reducing it to conform to a lower I|g(1465) adopted in the decay of {+148}Pm g.s. Others: 6.5% {I17}, from I|g(1460) in the decay of 41 d activity, and 5.1% {I18}, from I|g(75) (1962Re03); 6.9% {I7} (1963Ba31) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
$Capture rate to excited states (directly feeding g.s.)=0.77|*10{+6} s{+-1} {I26}, corresponding to a percentage of 6.6% {I22} per muon capture (2019Zi01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5-,6-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
$Capture rate to this isomer=0.10|*10{+6} s{+-1} {I2} (IT decay) and 0.21|*10{+6} s{+-1} {I6} (|b{+-} decay), corresponding to a percentage of 0.85% {I17} and 1.79% {I51} per muon capture, respectively (2019Zi01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$atomic beam (1961Ca07), L(pol t,|a)=4; Ay(|q) gives L-1/2 
T$weighted average of 53.08 h {I11} (1971Ba28), 53.08 h {I10} (1966Mc11), 53.07 h {I10} (1963Ho15,1964Ho03), 53.09 h {I9} (1960Bu06). Others: 53.3 h {I7} (2015Ba10), 2.13 d {I9} (1999Po32, 95% confidence limit); 48 h {I3} (1960Ch15), 50.0 h {I15} (1952Ru10), 47 h (1950Ma05) 
MOMM1$static nuclear orientation (1963Gr10). Other: 1960Ch15 
${+150}Sm(t,|a) yields spectroscopic strength of 3.2 for ground state. The remaining strength of 0.83 is distributed among the 360, 462 and 475 levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol t,|a)=2; M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ 
T$other: 2.7 ns {I2} (|g(t) in (p,2n|g),1979Ko35) 
MOMM1$from TDPAC (1970Se11). Others: +2.13 {I15} (IPAC,1970Be67), 2.5 {I3} (1969Ta08), 2.3 {I3} (1966Sv01) 
$Strength of d{-5/2} shell in (t,|a) is mainly associated with this level. Remaining strength found in 211, 871, 959 levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol t,|a)=2; L-1/2 from Ay(|q) 
T$other: 3.1 ns {I2} (|g(t) in (p,2n|g),1979Ko35) 
MOMM1$from IPAC (1970Be67). Other: 2.25 {I60} (1970Se11,TDPAC). Value is not listed in 2020StZV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L(pol t,|a)=5; L+1/2 from Ay(|q); M2 |g to 7/2+ 
T$from (ce)|g(t) in |b{+-} (1967Ba27). Other: 41 |ms {I10} from |b|g(t) (1966He04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(pol t,|a)=3; L+1/2 from Ay(|q) 
T$other: 2.8 ns {I2} (|g(t) in (p,2n|g),1979Ko35) 
MOMM1$from TDPAC (1970Se11). Other: +2.19 {I11} IPAC (1970Be67). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(pol t,|a)=(5); L+1/2 from Ay(|q) 
E$this state appears to be different from 547 and 558 levels excited in |b{+-} or (p,2n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 3/2+, 7/2+ and 7/2-. Possible |gs to 1/2+ and 3/2- forbid 7/2. {I7}/2+ proposed in (d,3n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$3/2+,5/2,7/2,9/2+ from |gs to 5/2+ and 7/2+. L({+3}He,d)=2 suggests 3/2+, 5/2+; however, 871 group in ({+3}He,d) may correspond to 885, (5/2+) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 5/2- and 9/2+ and log| {If{+1u}t}=8.0 from 5/2- restrict J|p to (5/2+,7/2). L({+3}He,d)=5 is inconsistent with this but data would marginally fit L=4 also to allow 7/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 5/2+, 7/2+ and 7/2-; log| {If{+1u}t}=7.5 from 5/2-. L({+3}He,d)=2,3 from 0+ would support 5/2+ or 7/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J$L(pol t,|a)=2; L-1/2 from Ay(|q). L(d,{+3}He)=1 is inconsistent with 3/2+. But the level in (d,{+3}He) may be 1329 and/or 1367 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=3 at 60|', |?2 at 45|' 
L$L=3,4 are not consistent with adopted J|p=3/2+ 
S$for L=2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=19 at 60|', 33 at 45|' 
L$|s(|a,t)/|s({+3}He,d) gives L=2, inconsistent with (pol t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=17 at 60|', 14 at 45|' 
L$|s(|q) gives L=4 which is not consistent with (pol t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=6 at 60|', 11 at 45|' 
$L=(5) is inconsistent with J|p=(7/2+) in the Adopted Levels, while a fit with L=(4) is marginally acceptable, consistent with J|p=(7/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W (|mb/sr)=12 at 60|', |?13 at 40|' 
L$5 is inconsistent with |s(|q) in ({+3}He,d) 
S$for L=4 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$part of an unresolved triplet including the 211, 240, and 270 states. 
S$for L=1 component, value is for 2p{-1/2} factor; 0.09 if 3p{-1/2} form factor is used 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$part of an unresolved triplet of energies 360, 387, and 415 with L=4,0,2, respectively, as seen in {+150}Sm(pol t,|a) reaction. The L=0 component is not found in the analysis of the compound peak in the {+150}Sm(d,{+3}He) reaction. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$L=4 inconsistent with 552 L=5 level from (pol t,|a). 
S$for L=1 component, value is for 2p{-1/2} factor; 0.02 if 3p{-1/2} form factor is used 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$possibly corresponds to 786.72 (3/2+,5/2+) state seen in |b{+-} decay and the 791 (L=5) state in (t,|a) and other reactions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$in addition to the L=2 state which may be the 955(5/2+) level there appears to be an L=1 component 
S$for L=1 component, value is for 2p{-1/2} factor; 0.04 if 3p{-1/2} form factor is used 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$probably corresponds to 1329 and/or 1367 in adopted levels 
S$for L=1 component, value is for 2p{-1/2} factor; 0.09 if 3p{-1/2} form factor is used 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=5 |mb/sr 
L,J$1979St18 give L=4 and J=L-1/2 which is inconsistent with 3/2- from adopted levels. After discussion with one of the authors of 1979St18, in 1985 evaluation of A=149, it was agreed that the data are not inconsistent with L=1, J=L+1/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$114.3534 {I15} (2003Me01) 
T$weighted average of 2.54 ns {I7} (|g|g(t),1970Se11); 2.42 ns {I9} (|g|g(t),1969Ta08); 2.55 ns {I5} (|g|g(t),|b|g(t),1968Az04); 2.58 ns {I7} (|gce(t),1967Ba27); 2.4 ns {I2} (|g|g(t), 1966Go05); 2.52 ns {I4} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01); 2.62 ns {I10} (|b|g(t),1965Fo08). Other: 3.2 ns {I1} (|bce(t),1967Ba27) is not included in the average 
$g factor=0.83 {I6} (1970Be67). Others: 0.81 {I3}, 0.77 {I7} (1970Se11), 1.01 {I12} (1969Ta08), 0.91 {I10} (1966Sv01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$188.6796 {I17} (2003Me01) 
T$weighted average of 3.24 ns {I7} (|gce(t),1970Se11); 3.24 ns {I10} (|bce(t),1967Ba27); 3.46 ns {I14} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01) 
$g factor=0.72 {I10} (1970Be67), 1.5 {I4} (1970Se11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E$211.3624 {I15} (2003Me01) 
T$|bce(t) (1967Ba27). Others: |<0.8 ns (|g|g(t),1965Cu01); |<0.3 ns (|b|g(t),1965Fo08) 
$g factor=0.87 {I14} (1970Be67) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$270.2069 {I15} (2003Me01) 
T$weighted average of 2.55 ns {I7} (|g|g(t),1970Se11); 2.64 ns {I7} (|bce(t),1967Ba27); 2.6 ns {I2} (|g|g(t),1966Go05); 2.58 ns {I4} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01), 2.7 ns {I2} (|b|g(t),1965Fo08) 
g factor=0.62 {I3} (1970Be67); 0.98 {I14}, 1.07 {I7} (1970Se11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
E$288.2274 {I21} (2003Me01) 
J$M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ gives 5/2+,7/2+,9/2+ but 5/2+,7/2+ are excluded by (366|g)(288|g)(|q) (1986Ii01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
E$425.2798 {I22} (2003Me01) 
J$M1+E2 |g to 5/2+ and |g to 9/2+ give 5/2+,7/2+ but (229|g)(214|g)(|q) excludes 5/2+ (1986Ii01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$635.983 {I25}; (3/2+,5/2+) (2003Me01) 
E$635.97|g proposed from this level by 2003Me01 is a very poor fit. See comment for 635.7|g from 923.9 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
$Capture rate to excited states (directly feeding g.s.)=2.93|*10{+6} s{+-1} {I60}, corresponding to a percentage of 24.9% {I51} per muon capture (2019Zi01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
$Capture rate to this isomer=1.80|*10{+6} s{+-1} {I31}, corresponding to a percentage of 15.3% {I26} per muon capture (2019Zi01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
J$from |b{+-} decay and shell-model considerations. 
T$from 1977Ho09, others: 2.68 h~{I2} (1952Ki25), 2.7 h~{I1} (1963Ei06), 2.7 h (1952Lo01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$|m and Q have same sign. Values from atomic beam magnetic resonance (1963Bu14). See also 2005St24 compilation of moments 
$The g.s., K{+|p}=5/2+ and 117, K{+|p}=5/2- may form a parity doublet (1989So08,1993No01) 
$Proposed configuration=96% (5/2[413]) + 1% (1/2[431] |l=2 phonon) (1993No01) 
T$from |b(t) and |g(t) (1960Bu06). Others: 1963Ho15, 1952Ru10 
J$from atomic beam (1963Bu14,1961Ca07) and (pol t,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$E1 |g to 5/2- and M1+E2 |g from 1/2+ 
MOMM1$from IPAC (1977Se06). Value agrees with theoretical predictions. Other: 0.62~{I27} (IPAC 1972BeWU) 
$256, K{+|p}=3/2+ and 540, K{+|p}=3/2- may form a parity doublet (1989So08,1993No01) 
$Proposed configuration=90% (3/2[411]) + 1% (3/2[541] |l=3 phonon) + 2% (3/2[402] |l=2 phonon) (1993No01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=78% (1/2[420]) + 11% (1/2[550] |l=3 phonon) + 2% (5/2[413] |l=2 phonon) (1993No01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J$M1 |g to 5/2+ and |g's to 9/2+, 9/2- 
$Masked in (t,|a) and ({+3}He,d) by strongly excited 426(1/2+) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
$Not seen in (t,|a) or ({+3}He,d) nor expected from Nilsson assignment. In (d,{+3}He) L=2, 520 level corresponds to 508 or 524 level 
J$M1,E2 |g to 5/2+ and |g's to 1/2+, 7/2+. |g|g(|q) in {+151}Nd |b{+-} supports 3/2 over 5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$E2+M1 |g to 5/2-, |g's to 1/2+, 5/2+ not M2 (from RUL) 
$Proposed configuration=88% (3/2[541]) + 2% (3/2[411] |l=3 phonon) + 3% (1/2[550] |l=2 phonon) (1993No01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same as 597.1, but J=15/2 level is not expected in (t,|a) and (|a,t) reactions 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
J$(E1) |g to 5/2+ and |g to 1/2+ 
CONF$Assignment of 773.599 and 746.552 levels to this configuration (1977Se06) placed in doubt by absence of 7/2 and 11/2 members in (t,|a) and ({+3}He,d) (1979St06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2,3/2,5/2+)
level_comment:
J$|g to 1/2+. |g's to 1/2[402] band and absence of |g's to K=5/2 bands favors 1/2 choice 
CONF$See comment on 746.5 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=92% (7/2[404]) + 3% (3/2[402] |l=2 phonon) + 1% (7/2[523] |l=3 phonon) (1993No01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J$E1 |g's to 3/2- and (5/2)-. J=5/2 does not give consistent |d for 423|g from (424|g)(117|g)(|q) and (301|g)(424|g)(|q) (1989Ii01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=60% (1/2[411]) + 12% (1/2[541] |l=3 phonon) + 18% (5/2[413] |l=2 phonon) + 4% (3/2[411] |l=2 phonon) (1993No01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g's to 3/2+, 3/2-, 7/2+, 7/2- not M2 (from RUL). 736|g to 7/2+ probably E1 from consistency of ce and |g|g(|q) data in {+151}Nd |b{+-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
$This level may be the same as 943.1 from {+151}Nd |b{+-}. However, J{+|p}=7/2+ from (pol t,|a) is not consistent with log| {Ift}=7.8 from 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
E$the particle reactions identify levels with energies in the 1200 to 1209 range, associated with an L=4, 5 transfer 
J$from L=5 in ({+3}He,d) and possible assignment to 7/2[523] band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
$Unresolved from 1618.4 in (t,|a) and ({+3}He,d). The evaluator has arbitrarily associated the L=2 level seen in ({+3}He,d) with the 1618.42 level 
J$|g's to 3/2+, 3/2-, 5/2+, 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_comment:
$See comment on 1617.82 level 
J$|g's to 3/2, 7/2+. If same level as 1617 in ({+3}He,d) then L=2 gives positive parity. Also, log| {Ift}=6.4 from 3/2+ suggests J |= 7/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2,5/2)
level_comment:
J$log| {Ift}=6.3 from 3/2+ and |g to 5/2+ 
$The 1980 level observed in (pol t,|a) may be associated with either the 1973.32 or the 1989.71 level or both 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$assignment doubtful since level is composite, including 508(5/2+), 524(3/2+), 532(7/2-) and 540(3/2-) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
S$for J=L-1/2. For J=L+1/2, one gets S=0.15 and 0.5 for L=2 and L=4, respectively 
E$from 1979Do06. Composite peak may include 782(7/2+), 810, 840, 852(5/2+) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
CONF$(|p,5/2[532])~#(|n,3/2[532]) suggested by 1993Sh23. The 295 level contains the main component of this configuration 
J$log| {Ift}=6.4 to 0+ and 6.8 to 2+. M1 |g from 1+ 
T weighted average of 4.3 min {I4} (1977Ya07), 4.2 min {I2} (1975Wi08), 4.1 min {I1} (1971Da19), 4.1 min {I2} (1969Wa25) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$from E|b{+-}=1850 {I80} for |b{+-} decay from {+152}Pm (7.52 min) to the 1804 level in {+152}Sm and Q(|b{+-})({+152}Pm)=3508 {I26}. the value given is rounded off from 146~{I84} 
T from 1977Ya07. Others: 7.5 min {I2} (1975Wi08), 7.6 min {I7} (1972Wa04), 7.5 min {I10} (1971Da19) 
J log| {Ift}=5.6 to 5-; log| {Ift}=7.4 to 3- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=4.49 for |b{+-} decay from 0+ {+152}Nd 
CONF$(|p,5/2[532])~#(|n,3/2[532]) suggested by 1993Sh23 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (8)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
E,%IT$probably feeds 7.52-min level and, therefore, may be higher than level with T{-1/2}=7.52 min (1971Da19). See comment in 13.8-min |b{+-} decay 
J probably feeds K|p=7- {+152}Sm levels, Nilsson model 
T from 1985YaZV. Others: 15.0 min {I10} (1975Wi08), 18 min {I3} (1971Da19,1977Ya07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T From 1988GrZY and 1990An31 (same authors): others: 5.3 m {I3} (1969Sm04), 5.5 m {I2} (1962Ko10), and 5.4 m (1982Ba76, same authors as 1988GrZY and 1990An31). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+,3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J Assigned 3/2+,5/2+ from L=2 in {+154}Sm(d,{+3}He) (1981Le21) and J=1/2+ from tentative L=0 in (pol t,|a) (1978Bu18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
E observed peak may be a contaminant, but a level at 151 keV is reported in (pol t,|a) (1978Bu18). 
J J|p and band assignment are based upon L=5 in (pol t,|a); 1977SuZW tentatively assign L=2 from |a(|q). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L 1981Le21 decomposes |a(|q) into L=2 and 5 components, but in text they allow L=0 as an alternative with 1/2+,1/2[420]. assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J The 7/2+,3/2[411] state is assigned to this level, but in (pol t,|a) it is assigned to level at 588 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J Assigned 3/2+,3/2[422] by 1977SuZW, 5/2+,1/2[420] by 1981Le21, and 1/2+,1/2[420] in (pol t,|a) by 1978Bu18. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
J Assigned 5/2+,3/2[422] by 1977SuZW, a doublet of 3/2+,3/2[422] and 5/2+,3/2[422] by 1981Le21, and 5/2+,1/2[420] in (pol t,|a) by 1978Bu18. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J Reported as a strong line and assigned 7/2+,3/2[422] by 1977SuZW, but not observed by 1981Le21, so existence of line and assignment are doubtful. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 9/2+,7/2+
level_comment:
J Assigned 9/2+,3/2[422] by 1977SuZW, 7/2+,3/2[422] by 1981Le21, and doublet of 9/2+,1/2[420] and 3/2-,3/2[541] in (pol t,|a) by 1978Bu18. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
E 1981Le21 reports a doublet at 940 which is taken to be the 920 and 968 lines of 1977SuZW. 
J Assigned (3/2-,3/2[541]) by 1977SuZW based upon L=(1), L=2 by 1981Le21. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
L Reported as L=3 by 1977SuZW and L=4 by 1981Le21. 
J Assigned 7/2-,1/2[550] by 1977SuZW, 9/2+,9/2[404] by 1981Le21, and 7/2+,3/2[422] in (pol t,|a) by 1978Bu18. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2+),(3/2-)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=31, A{-y}=+0.03 {I7} 
J Probably the 3/2[541] Nilsson state. The observed value of d|s/d|W for this peak is larger than expected for the 3/2[541] Nilsson state, so 1978Bu18 attributed part of the intensity to the 9/2+ member of the 1/2[420] band. 
S 1978Bu18 give s |< 0.15 for the L=4 component and |< 0.034 for the L=1 component. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=35, A{-y}=-0.43 {I6} 
J Angular distributions suggest L=2, and negative analyzing power indicates J=L-1/2. The J|p assignment is listed as tentative because the L-transfer is not definite. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=33, A{-y}=+0.10 {I6} 
J Although the angular distribution is consistent with L=2 and the energy agreement is good, the analyzing power is not consistent with DWBA curves for L=2, so the J|p assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
E Although it is generally assumed that this level is the ground state, this has not been determined experimentally. 
J$(3,4), from log{Ift} values of |b{+-} branches to {+154}Sm levels of known J|p. (4+) based on 2012So10 analysis of two-quasiparticle (2qp) bandhead energies based on the mapping of the physically admissible configuration space with inputs from observed 1qp energies in the core odd-mass isotope and isotone, and the experimental 2qp level energies in the neighboring odd-odd nuclei. Proposed configuration: (|p 5/2[532])+(|n 3/2[521]) (2012So10). Other discussions of possible configurations are given by 1971Da28, 1972Ta13, 1973Pr05, and 1974Ya07. 
T Weighted average of 2.9 m {I2} (1974Ya07), 2.5 m {I2} (1973Pr05), 2.65 m {I10} (1972Ta13), 2.8 m {I2} (1971Da28), and 2.5 m {I5} (1958Wi42), all from {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay. 
%B-$Assumed to be 100%. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$This level is generally assumed to be an excited level. The only experimental values of the energy are from the difference in Q(|b{+-}) deduced from endpoints of |b{+-} branches from the 1.73- and 2.68-m levels. 1972Ta13 give E(x)=210 {I70}, from Q(|b{+-})=4400 {I180} and 4190 {I170}; and 1971Da28 give E(x)=0 {I280} keV from Q(|b{+-})=3900 {I200} and 3900 {I300}. From a systematic study of the separation energies of Gallagher-Moszkowski pairs, and assuming their configuration assignments are correct, 2012So10 estimate that this level is 30 {I10} keV above the 2.68-m level. 
J$(0,1) from log{Ift} values of |b{+-} branches to {+154}Sm levels of known J|p. Note that log{Ift} |? 5.5 to 2+ at 2069 keV excludes J=0. (1-) based on 2012So10 analysis (see J|p comment at g.s.). Proposed configuration: (|p 5/2[413])+(|n 3/2[521]) (2012So10). For other discussions of possible configurations, see the comment for the g.s. J|p value. 
T Weighted average of 1.7 m {I2} (1974Ya07), 1.6 m {I2} (1973Pr05), 1.8 m {I2} (1972Ta13), and 1.8 m {I2} (1971Da28), all from {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay. 
%B-$Assumed to be 100%, since IT decay has not been observed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$Characterized by 2012So10 as the 2- member of the K|p=1- band based on the (|p 5/2[413])+(|n 3/2[521]) configuration and sustained by not being populated by |b{+-} decay from the 0+ parent. Also, E2 |g to (1-) determines |p=-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$M1 |g to (1-), (2-) from not being populated from 0+ |b{+-} parent. Proposed configuration (|p 5/2[532])+(|n 5/2[642]) in 2012So10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
J$(0-,1-,2-) from E1 |g from (1+), (1-,2-,3-) from M1 |g to (2-) and (0,1) based on log| {Ift}|?5.7 from 0+ parent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$(1-,2-,3-) from M1(+E2) |g to (2-), (2-,3-) from not being populated from 0+ parent in |b{+-} decay, (2-) from being populated from (1+) level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$(1+,2+) from E1 |g's to (1-) and (2-) respectively. (1+) from log{Ift}=5.2 from 0+ parent in |b{+-} decay. 2012So10 suggest that this is J|p=1+ with the configuration (|p 5/2[532])-(|n 3/2[521]). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$(0-,1-,2-) from E1 |g from (0+,1+); (2-) more likely from not being populated by |b{+-} decay from the 0+ parent. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$(1+,2+) from E1 |g to (2-) and (1-). (1+) based on log| {Ift}|?5.6 from 0+ parent. Proposed configuration J|pK = 1{++}0 (|p 5/2[413])(|n 5/2[642]) in 2012So10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$(0,1) based on log| {Ift}|?5.6 from 0+ parent. (1+) from proposed configuration (|p 5/2[413])(|n 3/2[651]) in 2012So10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$From log{Ift}|?4.8 from 0+ parent in |b{+-} decay; 2012So10 assign configuration of ((|p 5/2[532])(|n 3/2[532])) (with rather strong |DK=0 band mixing) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_comment:
J$(0,1) based on log| {Ift}|?5.2 from 0+ parent. (1+) from proposed configuration (|p 5/2[413])(|n 3/2[402]) in 2012So10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$Previosuly levels scheme given with its lowest (0-,1-) level shown as being at 0 keV. However, this level may be an isomer, as discussed in the {+154}Pm Adopted Levels, with most likely the (3,4) state as g.s., relative to which the excitation energy of here (0-,1-) lowest state is undetermined (marked as the amount "x" in Adopted Levels). 
J,T$From Adopted Levels where this isomer is most likely the first "x" excited state of {+154}Pm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
E$according to 2018Bh07, the proposed level scheme can most probably be built on the g.s. of {+154}Pm, presumed to be the 2.68 min, (4+) state as justified in the Adopted Levels. However because the 1.73 min, (1-) isomer presumed to be the first excited state is not excluded to be g.s., 2018Bh07 marked the lowest level of their proposed scheme generically as of energy (0+x) and spin I{-0}, with all the excited states adding up onto this values. To avoid any ambiguity due to the generic notation, the evaluator adopted the 2.68 min, (4+) state, the most likely g.s. of this nucleus, as the lowest for this level scheme too. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T from 1988GrZY. Other value: 48 s {I4} (1982Gr13). 
J log| {Ift}=5.4 to 3/2- level in {+155}Sm suggests |p=- and J=1/2, 3/2, or 5/2. |b transitions to 7/2- levels rule out 1/2 and 3/2. The low log| {Ift} value to the 778, 3/2-, level in {+155}Sm suggests that the asymptotic quantum numbers of both orbitals involved in the |b transition are the same ([532] in this case). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$2007Sh05 propose J{+|p}=(4-), but the evaluator has not adopted this value. See the relevant discussion in the adopted values. 
T From {+156}Pm adopted values and based on data of 1987Gr12. 
$Probable conf is |p5/2[532]+|n3/2[521]. Note that 2007Sh05 propose that the conf is |p5/2[532]+|n3/2[651], in which case |p would be negative. The evaluator has not adopted this proposal. See the discussion on this point in the adopted values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$2007Sh05 propose J{+|p}=(1-), but the evaluator has not adopted this value. See the relevant discussion in the adopted values. 
T$From 2007Sh05. From a careful analysis of the decay curve of the K-line of the 150.3|g, 2007Sh05 suggest the possible presence of a second activity, in addition to that of the g.s., with T{-1/2}=2.3~s {I20}. They assign it to the decay of an isomeric state at 150~keV in {+156}Pm. 
$Probable conf is |p5/2[532]-|n3/2[521]. 2007Sh05 propose that the conf is |p5/2[532]-|n3/2[651], in which case |p would be negative. The evaluator has not adopted this proposal. See the discussion on this point in the adopted values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$Based on assumption that the evaluator's proposed conf (from general considerations, the most plausible one) is correct. J=4 is consistent with the observed |b{+-} decay of {+156}Pm to {+156}Sm levels with J{+|p}=3, 5- and 6+ (1990He11). Based on these latter data, 1990He11 proposed |p=-, with conf=|p5/2[413]+|n3/2[521]. The evaluator has not adopted this conf, based on the expectation that it is unlikely to form the g.s. for this nuclide. Assuming |p=-, 2007Sh05 ({+156}Nd |b{+-} decay) assign conf=|p5/2[532]+|n3/2[651]. A discussion of various available configurations for {+156}Pm, together with the role of log| {Ift} values in their assignment, is given by 2011So05. The |p=+ assignment is shown as questionable, since the apparent existence of a |b{+-} transition to a 6+ state in {+156}Sm presents some problems for it. (This situation is discussed by 2011So05.) 
T$From 1987Gr12, |g(t). Others: 28.2~s {I11} (1986Ma12), |g(t); and 29~s {I2} (1986Ok01) |g(t). Other reports presenting the data of 1987Gr12 are 1986GrZX and 1988GrZY. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT;ISO=M
level_comment:
J,T$From the adopted values. 
T$From 2007Sh05. From a careful analysis of the decay curve of the K-line of the 150.3|g, 2007Sh05 suggest the possible presence of a second activity, in addition to that of the g.s., with T{-1/2} = 2.3~s {I20}. They assign it to the decay of an isomeric state at 150.3~keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_comment:
E$deduced from measured mass excess using |p{+-}ICR technique (2020Or03) 
J$as proposed by 2020Or03 based on assigned configuration of |p5/2[532]|n3/2[521] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (J)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level may correspond to the known g.s. of {+156}Pm with J|p=4(+) 4(-) and T{-1/2}=26.7 s (2018Bh07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$assigned as the |p5/2[532] state in analogy to the ground state of {+153}Pm (1990Ja11). This assignment is consistent with the log {Ift} values of |?5.5 to a (3/2-) level and |?6.0 to a (5/2-) level in the daughter nucleus {+157}Sm. 
T$weighted average of 10.50 s {I12} (1990An31, earlier half-life of 10.90 s {I20} in 1987Gr12 from K x-ray and |g decay curves) and 10.66 s {I16} (1992Sh32). Note that 1992Sh32 is a secondary reference (an annual laboratory research report) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$2015YoZX and 2015YoZY made no comment about the isomeric state energy, or whether the 121|g is unique, therefore x |> 0 
T$from delayed |g-ray measurement with time window 16 |ms by 2015YoZX and 2015YoZY. Both references state that T{-1/2} is much greater than 16 |ms 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode has been detected and expected, followed by possible |b{+-}-delayed neutron decay. 
T$weighted average of 1.648 s {I+43-42} (2022Ki23, binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implants)|b-correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain); 1.48 s {I18} (2017Wu04, fit to the (implants)|b{+-}-correlated spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods, including contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays); and 1.5 s {I2} (2005Ic02, from 1.6 s {I2}, 1.5 s {I4}, 1.4 s {I3} for decay curves for Sm K{-|a} x rays and the 71.8|g and 261.3|g, respectively; also 1.47 s {I15} in 2001AsZY, and 2 s {I1} in 1998IcZZ, 2000IcZZ). 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY thesis. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from (270.6|g+330.3|g+644.4+801.7|g+921.2|g)(t) (2021Yo08). 
$Proposed configuration=|p5/2[532]~#|n7/2[633]~#|n5/2[523] (2021Yo08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from (270.6|g+330.3|g+644.4+801.7|g+921.2|g)(t) (2021Yo08) Authors also deduced T{-1/2} values for each |g(t): 2.7 |ms {I14} for 81.2|g, 4.5 |ms {I23} for 99.0|g, 2.8 |ms {I12} for 119.2|g, 4 |ms {I4} for 164.7|g, 5 |ms {I4} for 180.9|g, 8.3 |ms {I12} for 197.2|g, 5.1 |ms {I25} for 218.2|g, 5.4 |ms {I23} for 231.8|g, 3.1 |ms {I4} for 251.7|g, 4.3 |ms {I9} for 270.6|g, 3.1 |ms {I4} for 313.4|g, 4.51 |ms {I16} for 330.3|g, 5.8 |ms {I5} for 644.4|g, 2.9 |ms {I9} for 669.4|g, 5.5 |ms {I7} for 788.8|g, 3.9 |ms {I9} for 801.7|g, and 5.8 |ms {I5} for 921.2|g, from which evaluator deduces a weighted averaged value of 4.40 |ms {I23}, but with reduced |h{+2}=3.6 as compared to critical |h{+2}=1.6; unweighted average is 4.51 |ms {I35}. 
$Proposed configuration=|p5/2[532]~#|n7/2[633]~#|n5/2[523] (2021Yo08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ Mainly |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
E$the observed {+160}Pm fragments assumed to correspond to the g.s. However the assignment to the ground state is ambiguous, given the possible existence of an isomeric state. 
J$(6-) can be assigned from systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). However the assignment is very tentative and not adopted in the data field 
J$Kondev assigned (6-) in the data field but I movet it only in comment because it can mislead the user 
T$from 2017Wu04 (fit of the time distribution of electrons detected after the implantation of an ion, correlated to them in position and time employing the least-squared and unbinned maximum likelihood methods in a parallel analysis that included contributions from the methods in decays of parent, daughters, granddaughters, as well as a constant background). See also 0.44 s from theoretical calculations (2019Mo01) 
CONF$In this mass region the |p5/2[532] and |n7/2[633] Nilsson orbitals are expected near the proton and neutron Fermi surfaces, respectively. Thus, using the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule, one may expect the K|p=6-, |p5/2[532]~#|n7/2[633] configuration for the ground state. The existence of a low-spin, K|p=0- isomer, arising from the same configuration, is also possible. The assignment proposed by 2020Or03. 
CONF$by F.G. Kondev 
$ Production |s=518 nb {I36} (2012Ku26) (at 1 GeV/nucleon) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$deduced from measured mass excess using |p{+-}ICR technique (2020Or03) 
J$(1-) proposed by 2020Or03 based on |p5/2[532]~#|n7/2[633] assigned configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by possible |b{+-}-delayed neutron decay. 
E$the reported activity and half-life may include both the g.s. and an isomeric state of {+160}Pm. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and ground-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|p5/2[532] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
$ Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=161 nb {I9} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$609.2|g to (13/2-), 727.5|g to (11/2-); proposed configuration 
T$weighted average of values deduced from 61.5|g(t), 80.2|g(t), 96.7|g(t), 177|g(t), 118.2|g(t), 609.2|g(t) and 727.5|g(t) (2015YoZX). 
CONF$K|p=13/2+, |p5/2[532]~#|n{+2}(1/2[521],7/2[633]) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$weighted average of values deduced from 61.5|g(t), 80.2|g(t), 96.7|g(t), 177|g(t), 118.2|g(t), 609.2|g(t) and 727.5|g(t) (2015YoZX). 
CONF$K|p=13/2+, |p5/2[532]~#|n{+2}(1/2[521],7/2[633]) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by |b{+-}-delayed neutron decay. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$from 2022Ki23 by binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve and using Bateman equations to account for parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, as well as for |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain. Other: 630 ms {I180} (2017Wu04, by least-squares and maximum-likelihood fitting of decay curves included contributions from parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, plus constant background). 
CONF$From systematics of well-deformed nuclei in this mass region, the |p5/2[532] and |n1/2[521] Nilsson orbitals are expected near the proton and neutron Fermi surfaces, respectively. Thus, using the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule, one may expect the K|p=2+, |p5/2[532]~#|n1/2[521] configuration for the ground state. The assignment is made by the evaluator (F.G. Kondev). 
$ Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=25 nb {I3} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|p5/2[532] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
$ Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=4.5 nb {I15} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by |b{+-}-delayed neutron decay. 
E$the reported activity and half-life may include both the g.s. and an isomeric state of {+163}Pm. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=116.2 ms, %|b{+-}n=9 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=338 ms, %|b{+-}n=5.5 (2016Ma12) 
$A total of 74 counts were assigned to {+164}Pm for spectrometer setting on Pr, and 46 counts for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=0.10 nb {I2} for Pr setting, and 74 pb {I11} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
J$0+ or 5+ from |W{-|p}=5/2- and |W{-|n}=5/2- orbitals proposed in 2019Mo01 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight of 550 ns given in 2018Fu08. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical values of 116 ms (2019Mo01) and 338 ms (2016Ma12). From a general decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number, T{-1/2} for {+164}Pm is expected to be <0.6 s, based on measured half-lives of 1.05 s for {+161}Pm, 0.63 s for {+162}Pm, and 0.43 s {I35} for {+163}Pm, available in literature. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by |b{+-}-delayed neutron decay. 
$%|b{+-}n=6.18 {I+180-179} listed in 2022Ki23. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
J$5/2- from |W{-|p}=5/2- orbital proposed in 2019Mo01; also from systematics in 2021Ko07 
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23). Lower limit from time-of-flight of 550 ns is given in 2018Fu08. 
$T{-1/2}=297 ms {I+111-110}, %|b{+-}n=13.26 {I+623-615} listed in 2022Ki23 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY. 
$A total of five counts were assigned to {+165}Pm for spectrometer setting on Pr, and three counts for setting on Gd in 2018Fu08. 
$Production |s=10 pb {I+8-5} for Pr setting, and 4.6 pb {I+45-25} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by |b{+-}-delayed neutron decay. 
$T{-1/2}=297 ms {I+111-110}, %|b{+-}n=13.26 {I+623-615} listed in 2022Ki23 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2+,3/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E$it is assumed that the observed events corresponds to the g.s. 
J$from fitting of experimental delayed-proton spectrum with statistical-model calculations (1999Xu05). 1/2+ proposed in theoretical calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$from timing of 134|g in {+128}Nd (1999Xu05,2005Xu04) 
$Average proton energy of a wide peak=3.7 MeV 
$Measured production cross section |? 70 nb 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E$The assignment of this level as g.s. is tentative 
J$Observed %|e+%|b{++} feeding to the 5/2+ and 7/2+ levels of the |p3/2[411] (d{-5/2}) band in {+133}Pm; Population of the 2+ state in {+132}Nd following |ep; Comparison between the fit to |ep spectrum and calculations using the statistical model in 1977Bo02 support J=5/2. Similar conclusions can be drawn from Fig.2 in 2006Xu07 
T$weighted average of 3.2 s {I4} (|ep(t) in 1977Bo02), 2.8 s {I2} (|ep(t) in 1985Wi07), 3.2 s {I7} (213|g(t) in coin with |ep in 2006Xu07) and 2.8 s {I5} (84.5|g(t) in 2001Xu04) 
CONF$|n5/2[402] (d{-5/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$The assignment of this level as an isomer is tentative. Calculations using the Woods-Saxon-Strutinsky approach in 2006Xu07 predict that the 1/2[541] orbital is 120 keV lower in energy compared to 5/2[402] one 
J$Tentative assignment. Given the proposed |n1/2[541] (h{-9/2}) configuration, the rotational band associated with this state would be expected to have large signature splitting owing to the strong Coriolis interactions, and in some instances the J|p=5/2- band member becomes lower in energy 
T$weighted average of 3.7 s {I7} (1993BrZU) and 3.4 s {I5} (2001Xu04) from 156.8|g(t) and 369.6|g(t) 
CONF$|n1/2[541] (h{-9/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Z
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
CONF$|n7/2[523] (h{-11/2}), supported by the in-band properties 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=U
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$the (5/2+) g.s. or the (1/2-) isomeric level in {+133}Sm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$comparison of the delayed-proton spectrum with the statistical model calculations (1977Bo02) suggests 7/2+. Analysis of |ep data by 1989Vi04 favors J=3/2,5/2; 1989Vi04 propose two isomers in {+135}Sm with J|p=9/2-, 11/2- for lower energy isomer and J|p=3/2+,5/2+ for higher energy isomer. In high-spin studies low-lying states of J=(3/2+) and (7/2+) are proposed, but the absolute energies are unknown. There seems no evidence for the existence of a long-lived 9/2- or 11/2- isomer in {+135}Sm in high-spin studies, a low lying 9/2- level is suggested with T{-1/2}=7 ns - 35 ns 
T$from timing of delayed protons, |g- and x-rays (1989Vi04). Other: 10 s {I2} (1977Bo02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level may be the g.s., in which case x=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T$7 ns - 35 ns (1996MuZZ) 
E$|?100 keV (1996MuZZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (31/2-)
level_comment:
E$this level may be the initial level of a different sequence, not connected with..+y levels, if 315|g is placed elsewhere 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (3/2+)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$this level may be the g.s., in which case value of x=0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=AP;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T$7 ns to 35 ns (1996MuZZ) 
E$|?100 keV (1996MuZZ). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from beam-|g(t) in (HI,xn|g) 
J$from intensity pattern, absence of branch to 6+ yrast level and systematics of N=74 nuclei 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$the 254|g and 1058|g are observed with equal intensities, thus ordering is not definite. Reverse ordering would result in a level at 3366 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (22+)
level_comment:
E$Probable transition to 5635 level has not yet been identified. 
J$from strong feeding of 18+ member of positive parity sideband and assumption that 4~h of spin is missing in unobserved linking transitions, deduced from comparison of experimental data and theoretical calculations in this mass region (1998Ob02). 
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from beam-|g(t) (1994Br15) 
J$from intensity pattern, absence of branch to 6+ yrast level, and systematics of N=74 nuclei 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (29/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Deduced by evaluators from the intrinsic transition quadrupole moment qt=4.8 eb 4 (Doppler Shift Attenuation Method (DSAM), 2001Ri20, 2002La09). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 3.1 m {I2} from 1983GaZT and 3.0 m {I3} from 1973WeZK 
$Evaluated nuclear charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.960 fm {I4} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$571.3|g (M1+E2) to (3+) and 911.0|g to (2+); possible |e feeding from (6-) based on intensity imbalance in {+138}Eu |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$proposed by 1994Pa27 in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,3p|g) based on configuration systematics of neighbouring nuclei. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.9556 fm {I34} (2013An02 evaluation) 
J$spin from laser atomic spectroscopy (1992Le09); |p=+ from E2 |g from 5/2+. 
T$from 1982De06 (273.7|g,306.7|g). Other: 2.6 min {I3} (1973VaYZ) 
MOMM1$laser resonance ionization mass spectroscopy (1992Le09,1988Al41) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to 5/2+; |p=- from allowed |e decay to (11/2)-. 
T$from IT decay. 
MOMM1$nuclear orientation with |g detected (1992Si22) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T from 1972De23. Others: 14.7 min {I2} (1987De04), 14.75 min {I15} (1968Bl14), 13.7 min {I8} (1967He23) 
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.9565 fm {I34} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 6.31 ps {I42} from 2015Be25 in (HI,xn|g) dataset by recoil-distance Doppler-shift (RDDS) method and 5.8 ps {I5} from Coulex (from B(E2)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from (HI,xn|g) (1988Ba22); other: 22.3 ns {I18} (same dataset, 1988St02) 
MOMM1$From |g(|q,H,t) 
MOME2$From |g(|q,t,electric field gradient) (1985Be23) 
|m and analysis of the collective band suggests two neutron configuration [|n(h{-11/2}),|n(h{-11/2})] 
J$E2 |g to 8+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from (HI,xn|g) (1988Ba22); other: 6.2 ns {I8} (same dataset, 1988St02) 
MOMM1 from |g(|q,H,t) 
CONF$|m and the structure of collective band suggests two particle proton configuration [|p(h{-11/2}),|p(h{-11/2})] 
J$E2 |g to 8+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 1988Ba22; other: 22.3 ns {I18} (1988St02) 
MOMM1 From |g(|q,H,t) 
MOME2 From |g(|q,t,electrical gradient) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOME2$average of +0.02 {I+41-15} and -0.13 {I+38-14} from two different methods 
T$deduced by evaluator from B(E2)|_=0.23 {I2} (2016Kl05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from angular correlation coefficients for 459|g-531|g cascade 
T$deduced by evaluator from B(E2)|_=0.35 {I5} (2016Kl05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
|m: from hfs (1988Al41) 
T from 1977Ke03. Others: 11.0 min {I10} (1973VaYZ), 11.3 min {I3} (1972Ep01), 9.0 min {I5} (1970Ar17) 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), log| {Ift}=5.82 to 3/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
|m,Q: from hfs (1988Al41) 
T$weighted average: 21.2 min {I12} (1993Al03), 22.1 min {I3} (1972Ep01), 22.8 min {I2} (1972De23), 22.5 min {I5} (1970Ar17), 22.9 min {I5} (1968Bl13), 22.5 min {I14} (1967He23) 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), log| {Ift}=5.7 to 2091.6 negative-parity level of {+141}Pm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J |g to 11/2- and from 9/2-,11/2-, no |e via 11/2- and 5/2+ parent, syst for 7/2- levels in N=79 nuclei 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=5.1 from 8- to the 2371 level, E2 |g from 2371 to 2347, E2 |g from 2347 to 1784, and |g from 1784 to 2+ uniquely establishes J|p(2371)=7-, J|p(2347)=5-, and J|p(1784)=3- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J see comment on the 1784 level 
T from |b|g(t) in |e decay of {+142}Eu (1975Ke08); other: 175 ns {I5} (HI,xn|g) (1984LaZU) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$|?(25) relative spin predicted according to the method given by 1993Ra07 and priv comm from I. Ragnarsson to G. Hackman (August 1993) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from (741.1|g-start)(556.5|g,1023.2|g,767.9|g-stop)(t) (2014Ra03). Mean lifetime is quoted as 205 ns {I4} ns in caption of figure 3 and text, but 214 ns {I3} in authors' Figure 3. Half-life of 142.1 ns obtained in this experiment is in disagreement with 170 ns {I2} given in Adopted Levels of {+142}Sm in ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from Adopted Levels of {+142}Sm in ENSDF database. The existence of the isomer is confirmed by 2014Ra03 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$error-weighted average of two results obtained for E2 matrix elements: 0.83 eb {I4} using {+48}Ti target, and 0.88 eb {I10} using {+94}Mo target 
T$deduced by compiler from B(E2) value 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J L=2 in (p,d), atomic beam (1972Ek05) 
T$Unweighted average of 8.85 min {I5} (1972De23), 8.83 min {I1} (1968Bl13), 8.65 min {I25} (1967Go06), 8.84 min {I2} (1966Ma15), 8.57 min {I8} (1968Bo25). Other: 8.6 min {I2} (1993Al03) 
|D<r{+2}>({+143}Sm,{+144}Sm)=-0.043 {I4} (1999GaZX) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
J L=5 in (p,d); value of T{-1/2} is typical for M4 754|g ray; whereas if J|p=9/2-, B(E3)(W.u.)=9.9|*10{+-8} would be unreasonably small 
T weighted average: 67 s {I2} (1969Ja02), 67 s {I3} (1967Go06), 65 s {I3} (1963Al05), 64 s {I3} (1960Ko02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2(+)
level_comment:
J 182|g ray to 13/2(-) is |DJ=1, E1; I(1755|g ray to 11/2-)/I(182|g ray E1)=0.07 is compatible with M2 for 1755|g ray. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
See {+143}Sm |e decay (66 s) 
T{-1/2} weighted average: 67 s {I2} (1969Ja02), 67 s {I3} (1967Go06), 65 s {I3} (1963Al05), 64 s {I3} (1960Ko02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from adopted B(E2)=0.266 {I8} (1987Ra01). Others: 0.38 ps {I+21-10} (1993Ga16), 89 fs {I21} {+144}Sm(|g,|g') 
J$E2 |g to 0+ g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 1998Je05. 
$Possible configuration relative to {+146}Gd: [ |p (h{+2}{-11/2} (d{+-4}{-5/2}){-0}), |n(f{-7/2}i{-13/2}(d{+-2}{-3/2}){-0}) ]{-20-} (1998Je05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+,3-
level_comment:
$Angular distribution can be alternatively accounted for with L=(3) and |b{-3}=(0.011), or L=(5) and |b{-5}=(0.013) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
$Angular distribution can be alternatively accounted for with L=(3) and |b{-3}=(0.011), or L=(5) and |b{-5}=(0.011) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from widths measured by 1976Me17 and branching ratios of 1996Wi07 
$It is proposed that this state arises from the coupling of the 2+ (1660 keV) state with the 3- (1810 keV) state 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 1998Je05. 
$Possible configuration relative to {+146}Gd: [ |p (h{+2}{-11/2} (d{+-4}{-5/2}){-0}), |n(f{-7/2}i{-13/2}(d{+-2}{-3/2}){-0}) ]{-20-} (1998Je05) 
E$Misprinted as 9293.5 in 1994Ot02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GE
level_comment:
T$from 2019Be36 for the 2|n|e|b{++} decay mode for the decay branch of g.s. to 1560.9, 2+ at 90% confidence level. Limits for other decay modes and decay branches were also derived in 2019Be36 and are listed in the table above. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
MOMM1 Other: 0.92 {I6} (1989Ra17), -1.123 {I11} (1990En01) 
MOME2$others: -0.59 {I17} (1989Ra17), -0.60 {I7} (1990En01) 
J L=3 in (d,p), atomic beam (1978LeZA). Configuration=(|n p{-3/2}) (1997Ga22) 
T from 1959Br65 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J L=1 in (d,p), |g to 7/2- is |DJ=2, E2. Configuration=(|n p{-3/2}) (1997Ga22). 
T from 1975Be09 ({+145}Eu |e decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J L=6 in (d,p); |g to 7/2- is E3 (|g(|q) and RUL in (|a,3n|g)) 
T$from (|a,3n|g). Other: 14 ns (HI,xn|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J |g to 13/2+ is |DJ=1 M1 (from |g(|q) and T{-1/2} in (|a,3n|g)), no |g to <13/2 
T from (|a,3n|g) (1977Ha04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (49/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$from 1993Fe14. T{-1/2}=0.95 |ms shown in partial level scheme (2002Go06) 
J$Shape Isomer. Expected configuration=((|NU f7/2 h{-9/2}){+i13/2}(|p h{-11/2}){+2}) from syst of N=83 nuclides (2005Od03). Studied odd-even staggering with Z for shape isomers and found it similar to gs (2005Od04). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J observed L=1 and J=1/2-,3/2- (1975Bo22,1967Ch16); not consistent with J=7/2+ ({+145}Eu |e decay) and with absence of primary |g to this level from 1/2+ thermal neutron capture state in (n,|g) 
E this level was not observed by 1966Jo02 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Absolute d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=0.23 {I1} (6.0|'), 0.10 {I1} (9.0|'). 
E$this level likely corresponds to previous 1659, 5/2- level, populated weakly in the presented work through L=3 transfer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Absolute d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=0.39 {I1} (6.0|'), 0.21 {I1} (9.0|'). 
E$this level likely corresponds to previous 1858, 7/2+ or 1876, 7/2- level, populated weakly in the presented work through L=4 or 3 transfer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Absolute d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=0.31 {I1} (6.0|'), 0.19 {I1} (9.0|'). 
E$this level likely corresponds to previous 1997, 5/2- level, populated weakly in the presented work through L=3 transfer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
$Absolute d|s/d|W (mb/sr)=0.09 {I1} (6.0|'), 0.028 {I4} (9.0|'). 
E$this level likely corresponds to previous 2133, 3/2- level, populated weakly in the presented work through L=1 transfer 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from 2012Ki16. Others: 5|*10{+7} y (1953Du21), 7.4|*10{+7} y {I15} (1964Nu02), 10.26|*10{+7} y {I48} (1966Fr11), 8.5|*10{+7} y {I12} (1963Fr06), 10.31|*10{+7} y {I45} (1987Me08) 
Observed |a decay with E|a=2455 {I4} (1987Me08), 2460 {I20} (1964Nu02), 2550 {I30} (1966Fr11), 2550 {I50} (1960Ma39, 1953Du21), retardation factor=0.34 (1993Bu09) 
$Isotope shift, mean square radii differences (2013An02 (compilation nuclear radii of Z=0-96), 1999GaZX, 1990En01, 1986Al33) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$633.1|g E1 to 2+; direct population in {+146}Eu |e decay (J|p=4-); bandhead of one octupole phonon coupled level sequence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$634.1|g E2 to 2+; direct population in {+146}Eu |e decay (J|p=4-); assigned to level sequence based on g.s. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$1150.6|g M1+E2 to 4+, 1784.8|g E2 to 2+; direct population in {+146}Eu |e decay (J|p=4-), L(p,t)=(4) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
J$1303.5|g to 4+, 1036.7|g to 2+; log| {If{+1u}t}=10.4 in {+146}Eu |e decay population (J|p=4-) (1964Ta11) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$60.7|g E1 to 8+, 197.4|g E2 to 7-; assigned to one octupole phonon coupled state sequence 
T$Others: from (|a,xn|g): 1.0 ns {I5} (|g|g(t) in (|a,2n|g) (1980Ko07)), 1.1 ns {I5} (|a|g delay coin. in (|a,4n|g) (1978Ki11)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$754.2|g E2 to 7-, 556.9|g M1 (|DJ=0) to 9-; systematics of N=84 isotones (1978Ki11). Bandhead of level sequence with |DJ=1 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
J$2845.0|g to 2+, 2210.4 |g to 4+; log| {Ift}=8.45 in {+146}Eu |e decay (J|p=4-) population; L(p,t)=(4). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_comment:
J$569.83|g D (|DJ=0) to 9-, 757.6|g D+Q (|DJ=1) to 8-, 167.0|g from 11-. J|p=10- in {+139}La({+11}B,4n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 12+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$411.4|g (E1) (stretched) to 11-, 1397|g E3 to 9-, 1011.4|g E2 from 14+. Two octupole phonon coupled state, bandhead of level sequence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$537.5|g E2 (stretched) to 11-, 167.4|g (M1+E2) (|DJ=1) to 12- 433.0|g (E1) to 12+; assigned to the level sequence 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (13-)
level_comment:
J$172.5|g (M1+E2, |DJ=1) to (12-), 217.3|g D (stretched) from (14-). J|p=13+ in {+139}La({+11}B,4n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
MOMM1$measured by electron-nuclear double resonance (1972Ch27); other 0.8148 {I7} measured by atomic beam magnetic resonance - thermal beam (1966Wo05, as quoted by 2014StZZ) 
MOME2$measured by muonic x-ray hyperfine structure (1981Ba28); other: -0.261 {I7} measured by atomic beam magnetic resonance - thermal beam (re-evaluated data) (1992Le09, 2014StZZ) 
J$J=7/2 from 1952Bo21 by paramagnetic resonance measurements, |p from L(p,t)=0. 
$rms charge radius: 4.9892 fm {I35} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1,MOME2$measured by Mossbauer effect (1971Pa04, with Q value not listed by 2019StZV) 
T$weighted av. of 0.80 ns {I4} (1968Bo47), 0.78 ns {I3} (1970Ko38), 0.77 ns {I4} (1971Be53), 0.83 ns {I3} (1978VyZV), in {+147}Eu |e decay; 0.79 ns {I14} from B(E2)|^ in Coulomb excitation 
J$M1+E2 |g to 7/2-, g.s. and |g|g(|q) in {+147}Eu |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$measured by integral perturbed angular correlations (value not listed by 2019StZV) 
J$E2 |g to 7/2-, g.s. and |g|g(|q) in {+147}Eu |e decay 
T$1.25 ns {I3}, weighted av. of 1.25 ns {I4} ({+147}Eu |e decay) and 1.25 ns {I5} (Coulomb excitation), adopted as 1.25 ns {I4} (uncertainty not smaller than the smallest measured value) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from B(E2)|^ in Coulomb excitation 
J$M1+E2, |DJ=1 677|g ({+147}Sm(n,n'|g) to 5/2-, 121; M1(+E2) |g to 3/2-, 197 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-:9/2-)
level_comment:
J$3/2- to 11/2- compatible with B(E2)|^ (from 7/2-) in Coulomb excitation; 11/2- excluded from log| {Ift}=10.3 from 5/2+ g.s. in {+147}Eu |e 
T$0.43 ps {I5} in Coulomb excitation (from w. av. of B(E2)|^'s) These values are to be corrected for M1 mixing, unless 1107|g is pure E2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J$5/2+,7/2+ from E1 |g to 7/2-, g.s. and M1 |g from 3/2+,5/2+ 1549; 7/2+ less likely from |g from 3/2-, 1453 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2(-),5/2(+)
level_comment:
J$3/2,5/2,7/2,9/2- from log| {Ift}=8.5 from 5/2+ g.s. of parent in {+147}Eu |e; 3/2(-),5/2(+) from |g to 7/2-, g.s. and |g to 1/2+, 1220 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J$from ({+3}He,|a)/(d,t) cross-section ratios and association with Nilsson orbitals in {+148}Sm({+3}He,|a) (1977Se04, 1976BjZY) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted av: 0.80 ns {I4} (1968Bo47), 0.78 ns {I3} (1970Ko38), 0.77 ns {I4} (1971Be53), 0.83 ns {I3} (1978VyZV) via |g|g(t); other: 0.62 ns {I18} (1989Ad10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted av. (ext. unc.) of 1.30 ns {I5} (1978VyZV), 1.26 ns {I4} (1971Be53), 1.10 ns {I5} (1970Ko30), 1.35 ns {I10} (1968Bo47), 1.2 ns {I1} (1964Pr07), 1.31 ns {I5} (1962Be40) 
g-factor=-0.19 {I7} (1968Bo47) |g|g(|q,H). Other: 1970Be67 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=(1) gives J=(1/2-,3/2-); (1/2-) is suggested by 1983Av07 in (n,n'|g) in analogy to {+145}Nd. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
E,J$assigned by 1983Av07 who considered the 1120|g, 1197|g and 1318|g originating from this level. However due to the |e decay dataset in which the |g's originate from different levels, this level appears as split in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-,5/2-,7/2-
level_comment:
E,J$assigned by 1983Av07 who considered the 1274|g, 1350|g and 1472|g originating from this level. However due to the |e decay dataset in which the |g's originate from different levels, this level appears as split in the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
BE2$weighted av. (ext. unc.) of 0.093 {I11} (1980Pa21), 0.079 {I22} (1976Ga10), 0.101 {I16} (1977ScYK), 0.092 {I18} (1975ScYZ). Others: 1963Al14, 1964Al28 
T$using |d(121|g)=-0.33 {I3}, this T{-1/2} is in agreement with the adopted T{-1/2}=0.798 ns {I17}, while using |d=-0.278 {I20} results in discrepant T{-1/2} (both |d's from {+147}Eu |e). From this reason |d=-0.33 {I3} was adopted 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
BE2$weighted av. of 0.051 {I4} (1980Pa21), 0.050 {I8} (1977ScYK), 0.055 {I2} (1976Ga10), 0.045 {I10} (1975ScYZ) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$weighted av. of 0.191 {I7} (1980Pa21), 0.191 {I6} (1977GaZB), 0.188 {I10} (1977ScYL). Other: 0.226 {I13} (1976Ga10) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$weighted av. of 0.019 {I5} (1980Pa21) and 0.024 {I8} (1976Ga10), which results in T{-1/2}=1.00 ps {I21} in agreement with {+147}Eu |e value T{-1/2}=1.07 ps {I21} (while discrepant if the B(E2)|^'s that follow are included). Others: 0.013 {I4} (1977ScYK), 0.012 {I3} (1975ScYZ); see also 1963Al30 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-:9/2-)
level_comment:
BE2$weighted av. of 0.105 {I12} (1980Pa21), 0.068 {I10} (1977ScYK), 0.088 {I8} (1977ScYL), 0.120 {I25} (1976Ga10). Other: 0.019 {I4} (1975ScYZ) 
T$(partial) T{-1/2}=0.43 ps {I5} from B(E2)|^ (to be corrected for M1 mixing, unless 1107|g is pure E2) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J$from 1996Ur01, based on E1 |g to 11/2-, 717 (similar to 11/2+, 873 and decay pattern in {+149}Gd isotone, 2004Si16); 11/2- in 1980Ko07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$from 1970Gu14. Others: 8|*10{+15} y {I2} (1968Ko06), >3|*10{+15} y (1987AlZX), see also 1960Ka23, 1961Ma05, 1946Cu01 
$Rms charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.0009 fm {I16} (2004An14) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J E2 to 0+ 
T from 2001Ra27, based on their adopted B(E2)|^=0.720 {I30} derived from Coul. ex., (e,e'), and T{-1/2} from RDM. 
|m, other: +0.61 {I7} (1987Be08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J E1 to 2+ and L(d,t)=0 
T from thermal-neutron capture data using |g-ray induced Doppler (GRID) broadening technique 
$B(E3)|^=0.37 {I3} (Coul. ex., 1968Ke04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from B(E2)(2+ to 4+)=0.43 {I4} (Coul. ex., 1968Ke04) 
J J=4 from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; |p=+ from E2 to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from {+148}Sm(|g,|g'); other: 0.36 ps {I11} (Coul. ex., from B(E2)|^=0.36 ps {I11} and and branching 1454|g=0.499 {I5}) 
J E2 to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
T$from {+148}Sm(|g,|g') 
$B(E1)|^=0.013 {I5} (Coul. ex., 1968Ve01) 
J J=1 from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; |p=- from E1 to 0+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J J=5 from |g|g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; |p=- from E1 to 4+. This disagrees with J=3- or 4- from average-resonance capture in (n,|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from B(E2)=0.03 {I1} and 1664|g branching=0.34 {I1}. 
J J=2 from |g(|q) in |b{+-} decay; |p=+ from L(d,p)=3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J$from {+148}Sm(|g,|g') based on angular correlations (|p=+ from linear polarization in {+148}Sm(n,n'|g)) 
T$from {+148}Sm(|g,|g') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-,5-
level_comment:
J J=4,5 from |g|g(|q) in |e decay; |p=- from M1,E2 from 5-,6-. This contradicts J|p=+ from L(d,p)=L(d,t)=1 for levels at 2532 {I3}, and 2531 {I3}, respectively, both observed by 1975Oe01. In (d,t), the level is an unresolved doublet; hence, the L assignments could be suspect. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-,5-
level_comment:
J J=4,5 from |g(|q) in |e decay; |p=- from M1 to 5-. J=3,4 from |g(|q) in (n,|g) E=0.020-1.0 keV; however, M1 to 5- rules out J=3. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J|p=4+ (1984Kr09), 4+ (1985Si16), 4+ (1987Ad08) 
E (n,|g) E=0.020-1.0 keV data show two closely-spaced levels at 2327.09 {I5} J|p=4+, and 2327.62 {I9} J|p=3+. E|g=1166.08 and 1777.35 are assigned to the level with higher energy. It is possible that these levels were not completely resolved in the |e decay data. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from 1993Ju01 deduced using Bethe level density formula; 0.5 ps {I+4-2} if a constant temperature Fermi-gas model is used 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=3.25 {I25} 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14 
T$other: 0.097 ps {I+14-11} from |G{-|g0}=0.0031 eV {I4} (1976Me17), and adopted |G{-|g0}/|G=0.659 {I7} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=1.20 {I24} 
E$2146.35 {I3} quoted by 2005Li14 as from 2000Bh03 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2(+)
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=1.6 {I3} 
J$2 from angular correlation ratios (2005Li14), |p=(+) from more likely E2 quadrupole 2381|g to 0+, g.s.; 3+,4+ (2000Bh03) 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=6.6 {I4} 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14. Other: |G{-|g0}=9.1 {I6} (1993Zi05); |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.00 {I5} (1993Zi05) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=36.1 {I9} 
J$(1,2+) (2000Bh03) 
$B(E1)=4.6|*10{+-5} {I3} (1993Zi05 for E1 transition which however is actually M1 (2005Li14)) 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14 
$|G{-|g0}=33.9 {I21} (1993Zi05); |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.68 {I4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=11.0 {I6} 
J$(1,2+) (2000Bh03) 
$B(M1)=0.12 {I8} (1993Zi05 for M1 transition which however is not fully confirmed by 2005Li14 (D)) 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14 
$|G{-|g0}=13 {I9} (1993Zi05); |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.68 {I4} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
$|G{-|g0} (meV)=41 {I3} 
J$(1,2+) (2000Bh03) 
$B(M1)=0.39 {I4} (1993Zi05 for M1 transition which however is not fully confirmed by 2005Li14 (D)) 
WIDTHG0$from 2005Li14 
$|G{-|g0}=35 {I10} (1993Zi05); |G{-|g1}/|G{-|g0}=0.10 {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|b{-2}=0.132 (1989Ob02); 0.120 {I10} (1993Co03). See also 1993Pe16 for details of coupled-channel analysis and the deformation parameters deduced. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
|b{-3}=0.120 (1989Ob02); 0.130 {I10} (1993Co03). See also 1993Pe16 for details of coupled-channel analysis and the deformation parameters deduced. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
MOMM1 |m=+0.492 {I44} (1987Ba65) 
MOME2 Q=-0.77 {I34} (1967Si03), -0.97 {I27} (1973ClZF) 
T from the evaluation of 2001Ra27 
Adopted B(E2) is evaluated based on the following data: B(E2)=0.89 {I10} (1960El07), 0.70 {I8} (1966Ec02), 0.79 {I8} (1967Si03), 0.65 {I5} (1968Ve01), 0.63 {I5} (1968Ke04), 0.705 {I25} (1970Ge07), 0.725 {I25} (1973ClZF, based on B(E2)({+152}Sm)=3.35 ), 0.811 {I37} (1972LeYB) and T{-1/2}=7.33 ps {I40} (1971Di02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
B(E3)=0.37 {I3} (1968Ke04) 
B(E3): other: B(E3)=0.39 {I4} (1968Ve01) (value given by the authors has been increased by 10% to account for multiexcitation correction as estimated by them) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from B(E2)(2+ to 4+)=0.43 {I4} (1968Ke04). Other: 2.3 ps {I6} by DSRM (1971Di02) 
$Measured (2008Fi08) |s(4+)/|s(2+)=0.0157 {I2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
B(E2): unweighted average of 0.074 {I10} and 0.046 {I10} (1968Ke04). 
T from B(E2) and branching 1454|g=0.499 {I5} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_comment:
J 5- (1979Ha19,1985Si16,1990UrZS) 
B(E1)/B(E2)=0.68|*10{+-4} {I4} (1991Ur01); 0.62|*10{+-4} (1979Ha19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
J 6+ (1979Ha19,1985Si16,1990UrZS) 
B(E1)/B(E2)=0.81|*10{+-4} {I5} (1991Ur01); 0.90|*10{+-4} (1979Ha19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J 7- (1979Ha19,1985Si16,1990UrZS) 
B(E1)/B(E2)=0.62|*10{+-4} {I4} (1991Ur01); 0.69|*10{+-4} (1979Ha19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_comment:
J 8+ (1979Ha19,1985Si16,1990UrZS) 
B(E1)/B(E2)=1.80|*10{+-4} {I8} 
$Configuration=((|n[(f{+3}{-7/2}), h{-9/2}]){-8+}|p(d{+-2}{-5/2}){-0+}){-8+} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9-
level_comment:
J 9- (1979Ha19,1985Si16,1990UrZS) 
B(E1,92|g)/B(E2,678|g)=4.9|*10{+-4} {I9} (1991Ur01); B(E1,262|g)/B(E2,678|g)=0.3|*10{+-4} (1979Ha19) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10-
level_comment:
J 10- (1979Ha19,1985Si16,1990UrZS) 
$Configuration=(|n (i{-13/2},f{+3}{-7/2}){-10-}(|p(d{+-2}{-5/2}){-0+})) {-10-} and (|n [(i{-13/2},h{-9/2}){-10-}(f{+2}{-7/2}){-0+}]{-10-} (|p(d{+-2}{-5/2}){-0+}){-10-} } 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11-
level_comment:
J (11-) (1979Ha19,1985Si16), 11- (1990UrZS) 
B(E1)/B(E2)=1.04|*10{+-3} {I5} 
Configuration=(|n i{-13/2},h{-9/2}){-11-}(f{+2}{-7/2}){-0+}] (|p(d{+-2}{-5/2}){-0}){-11-} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 18+
level_comment:
J 18+ 
B(E1,73|g)/B(E2,449|g)=1.2|*10{+-4} {I2}; B(E1,385|g)/B(E2,449|g)=0.05|*10{+-4} {I1} 
$configuration=(|n[(i{-13/2}{+2}){-12+},(f{-7/2}{+2}){-6+}]{-18}|p(d{-5 /2{+-2}){-0+}){-18+} } 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 20(+)
level_comment:
J 20+ 
B(E1)/B(E2)=0.11|*10{+-4} {I3} 
$configuration=(|n[(i{-13/2}{+2}){-12+}(h{-9/2},f{-7/2}){-8+}]{-20+}|p( d{-5/2{+-2}{-0+}){-20+} } 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 21(-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J 21- 
$configuration=(|n(i{-13/2},h{-9/2}){-11-}(f{-7/2}{+2}){-0+} (|p(h{-11/2}{+2} (10+){-21-} } 
T by DSAM using {+130}Te({+22}Ne,4n|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(0|n+2|n,|b|b) to this level: >6.6|*10{+20} y (2009Ba21); other: >0.03|*10{+20} y (1982Be20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
$T{-1/2}(0|n+2|n,|b|b) to this level: >3.8|*10{+20} y (2009Ba21); other: >0.027|*10{+20} y (1982Be20) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
$Evaluated rms charge radius=5.0134 fm {I35} (2013An02) 
$Evaluated difference in charge radius: |d<r{+2}>({+144}Sm,{+149}Sm)=+0.6125 fm{+2} {I4} (2013An02) 
J$atomic-beam method; EPR, optical spectroscopy (1962Sp03). Others: 1958Hu17, 1954Mu15, 1952Bo21. Parity from L(p,d)=L({+3}He,|a)=L(|a,{+3}He)=3 
T$>2|*10{+15} y from limit on detection of a possible |a peak near 2 MeV (1970Gu14). Others: 1968Ko06, 1961Ma05, 1960Ka23 
MOMM1$laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy (1990En01). Others: -0.6717 {I7} (atomic beam,1966Wo05); -0.6692 {I11} (electron-nuclear double resonance technique (ENDOR),1972Ch27); -0.6708 {I10} (collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy,1985Al06). 
MOME2$from atomic beam (1972Ch55), and +0.075 {I2} (1992Le09, collinear fast-beam laser spectroscopy, +0.075 {I25} in 1985Al06). Others: +0.078 {I8} (1990En01,laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy); +0.075 {I8} (atomic beam,1966Wo05), 0.060 {I15} (Mossbauer spectroscopy,1970EiZY), 0.094 {I24} from muonic atom (1981Ba28) 
$Configuration=|nf{-7/2} 
$|d<r{+2}>({+148}Sm,{+149}Sm)=0.080 fm{+2} {I8} (1971Le12,1973Le16), 0.084 fm{+2} 28 (1979Po04), 0.092 fm{+2} {I5} (1980Br15), 0.092 fm{+2} (1985Al06), 0.080 fm{+2} {I8} (1986Al33), 0.093 fm{+2} {I5} (1987Bo58), 0.092 fm{+2} {I4} (1990Wa25), 0.089 fm{+2} (1990En01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0 from 5/2- 
T$from {+149}Eu |e decay. Others: 7.4 ns {I12} (2000Ki15), 6.9 ns {I5} (1966Be39), 7.6 ns {I5} (1963Ki15), 1962Jh04, 1962Al13. From B(E2)=0.229 {I17} and |d (22.5|g)=0.0715 {I11}, T{-1/2}(22.51 level)=5.9 ns {I10} 
$B(E2)=0.229 {I17} from muonic atom (1981Ba28) 
MOMM1$from Mossbauer effect (1970EiZY). Sign from 1967Of01 
MOME2$from muonic atom (1981Ba28). Other: +0.50 {I1} from Mossbauer (1970EiZY,1967Of01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LE
level_comment:
J$M1+E2 |g to 7/2-; M1+E2 |g from 3/2- 
T$(x ray)|g(t) in {+149}Eu |e (1970Ko30). T{-1/2}<1.3 ns from B(E2) in Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$L({+3}He,|a)=L(|a,{+3}He)=5; M1 |g to 7/2- 
T$average of 0.182 ns {I7} |g|g(t) (1965Cu01) and 0.253 ns {I27} |b|g(t) (1968Ak02) in {+149}Pm |b{+-}. Others: 1960Ma27, 1960Ch15 
$Configuration=|nh{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|DJ=2 E2 |g to 5/2- from 568|g(|q,pol) in in-beam |g-ray. L(p,d)=(1) is inconsistent with 9/2-. Either the level in (p,d) is different from 591 or the L-value is suspect 
$Dominant configuration=nh{-9/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0 from 5/2-. L(p,d)=(0) is inconsistent with J|p=5/2- for 785 and J|p=11/2+ for 789 level. Either the level in (p,d) is different or the L transfer is suspect 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
E$L(|a,{+3}He)=6+5 suggests a doublet with J|p=11/2+,13/2+ for one and 9/2-,11/2- for the other. The latter level is not listed here 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=6; |DJ=1, E1 |g to 11/2- from |g(|q). L(p,d)=6(+1) is consistent with 13/2+ for one component. The other component may correspond to 881.9 level, but L=1 is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2,7/2-)
level_comment:
J$|gs to 3/2- and 7/2-; log| {If{+1u}t}=6.9 from 7/2+. L(p,d)=(1) is inconsistent with the J|p assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=0+2. L=0 component corresponds to 1195 level in (d,t), whereas L=2 most probably corresponds to 1181 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: -
level_comment:
E,J$L(|a,{+3}He)=1+5 suggests a doublet with J|p=1/2-,3/2- for one and 9/2-,11/2- for the other. L=1,2 from |s({+3}He,|a)/|s(d,t)) is consistent with 1/2-,3/2- for one component in (|a,{+3}He) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2,5/2)+
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=2. L({+3}He,|a)=(5) from |s(|q) data is inconsistent with the assigned J|p. There could be two separate levels near this energy 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$L(|a,{+3}He)=3+6 suggests a doublet with J|p=5/2-,7/2- for one and 11/2+,13/2+ for the other. The latter level is not listed here, separately 
J$L(p,t)=0 from 5/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (25/2 : 33/2)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$possible decay to (29/2+) level 
T$from |g(t) of |gs from 3181 level and levels below 3181 
E$x |<200, since no delayed |gs observed above 200 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$centroid of a bump between 2800 and 4000 in (p,d). A similar wide structure observed in ({+3}He,|a) at about 3600 
J$L(p,d)=5+2 of the bump from 0+ shows contributions from h{-11/2} and d{-5/2}. Tail of this bump (4000-7200 range) agrees with L=4 or L=4+2 indicating contribution from g{-7/2} orbit 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$unweighted average of 0.182 ns {I7} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01), 0.253 ns {I27} (|b|g(t),1968Ak02). Other: 1960Ma27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$22.499 {I7} (1996Vy01) 
T$weighted average of 7.12 ns {I11} (ce(x-ray)(t),1970Ko30) and 7.37 ns {I5} (|g|g(t),1996Vy01). Others: 6.9 ns {I5} (1966Be39), 7.6 ns {I5} (1963Ki15) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0006 {I6}. Other: 0.0047 (1967Bo42) 
$Level probably populated indirectly 
T$|<0.2 ns from the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.0010 {I10}. Other: 0.0099 (1967Bo42) 
$Level probably populated indirectly 
T$0.22 ns {I4} from the Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.022 {I2}. Others: 0.010 {I4} (1970Ga20), 0.11 (1963Al30) 
T$from B(E2)=0.022, adopted branching ratio and |d for 637|g. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)=0.223 {I19} (absolute measurement). Others: 0.19 (1967Bo42), 0.21 (1963Al30), 0.21 (1960Na13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-&5/2-
level_comment:
L$50%(L=1)+50%(L=3) 
E$corresponds to 528 and 558 levels. 1974GrYX give energy=560 and L=(3) 
$E=540 {I20}, L=3, S=1.1 (1969Ya08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$not clear whether this level corresponds to a tentative 659 level or the 664, 11/2- level. L=2 is, however, inconsistent with the latter assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,L$from other studies, known levels are 785, 5/2- and 790, 11/2+. L=0 is not consistent with either of these 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+&(1/2-)
level_comment:
L$60%(L=6)+40%(L=1). L=(5) from 1969Ya08 for an 890 {I20} level is inconsistent with J|p=13/2+ 
S$for J|p=13/2+ and 1/2- 
E$1969Ya08 give 890 {I20} with L=5, and S=4.1, whereas 1983Ga07 give 847 {I5} with L=6(+1). Energy quoted by 1983Ga07 seems erroneous. From spectrum in 1983Ga07, evaluators estimate the peak at 874 and not at 847. The two components with L=6 and L=(1) most likely correspond to 878.6 and 881.9 levels (see adopted levels). The L=5 assignment by 1969Ya08 is inconsistent with L=6 from (d,t) and multipolarity assignment from ce data in in-beam |g-ray study 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_comment:
E,L$identified with |nh{-11/2} level at 1308.8 from in-beam |g-ray. 1969Ya08 give E(level)=1310 and L=5, S=6.5, which agrees with 11/2- assignment. L=0 assignment for a level at 1311 (1974GrYX) seems incorrect 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)&(11/2-)
level_comment:
L$70%(L=2)+30%(L=5). L=0 for a 2047 level (1974GrYX) seems suspect 
$E=2040 {I20}, L=2, S=0.79 (1969Ya08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$centroid of a wide bump between 2800 and 4000. |s(|q) shows L=2+5. C{+2}S=1.6. A similar structure observed at 3600 in ({+3}He,|a) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$275 (1967Ve04) 
S$0.19 for J|p=7/2- 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)|?42 (1975Lo04), |?60 (1967Ve04) 
E$277 and 285 form an unresolved doublet 
L$data consistent with L=3 for 277 level and L=5 for 285 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
E$661 (1967Ve04) 
S$for L=5. L=4 choice not consistent with adopted J|p 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=15 (1975Lo04), 9 (1967Ve04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
E$697 (1967Ve04) 
S$for L=1. L=2 choice not consistent with adopted J|p 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=35 (1975Lo04), 53 (1967Ve04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
L,S$most likely for 0+22 levels. Other L=3, S=1.94 for 0+22 (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=60 (1980Re05), 46 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
E$280 {I10} (1980Re05), 282 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=5, S=1.02 (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=45 (1980Re05), 38 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
L$1,0 from cross section ratio, but (d,t) gives L=1 (1975Lo04) 
S$for L=1, J|p=3/2- (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)<1 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$L=0 suggested from cross section ration in Fig. 5 of 1975Lo04, but L=1 in (d,t) 
S$for L=1, J|p=3/2- (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)<1 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$546 {I10} (1980Re05), 558 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=2,3 from cross section ratio, but L=3 from (d,t); S=0.11 for L=3 (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=7 (1980Re05), |?3 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
E$635 {I10} (1980Re05), 636 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=2 suggested from cross section ratio, but L=3 in (d,t); S=0.33 for L=3(1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=21 (1980Re05), 19 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
E$663 {I10} (1980Re05), 664 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=4,5 from cross section ratio, but L=5 from (d,t); S=0.38 for L=5(1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=13 (1980Re05), |?6 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
E$876 {I10} (1980Re05), 879 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=6 from cross section ratio, S=1.66 (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=94 (1980Re05), 94 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$925 {I10} (1980Re05), 925 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=2 from cross section ratio (1975Lo04) 
S$from 1975Lo04 for L=2 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=9 (1980Re05), 4 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
E$1047 {I10} (1980Re05), 1050 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$L=2,1 from cross section ratio, but (d,t) gives L=2 (1975Lo04) 
S$1.20 (1975Lo04) for L=2 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=22 (1980Re05), 24 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1147 {I10} (1980Re05), 1153 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
L$from cross section ratio (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=6 (1980Re05), 7 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E$1186 {I10} (1980Re05), 1199 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
L$1980Re05 state that |s(|q) distribution has poor match with L=0 DWBA distribution. Other: L=1,2 from cross section ratio in 1975Lo04, but L=0 from (d,t) 
S$4.9 (1975Lo04) for L=0 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=25 (1980Re05), 22 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1236 {I10} (1980Re05), 1244 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=19 (1980Re05), 14 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
E$1307 {I10} (1980Re05), 1311 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
J$cross section ratio suggests high-spin level (1975Lo04) 
S$2.2 (1975Lo04) for L=5 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=106 (1980Re05), 81 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1464 {I10} (1980Re05), 1477 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
L$from |s(|q) in Fig. 5 of 1980Re05. Other: 0,1,2 (1975Lo04) from cross section ratio 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=10 (1980Re05), |?6 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$1575 {I10} (1980Re05), 1571 {I5} (1975Lo04) 
L$from cross section ratio (1975Lo04) 
$d|s/d|W(|mb/sr)=9 (1980Re05), 8 (40|') (1975Lo04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$from 1977Se04. Centroid of a wide structure 
L$|s(|q) data for this bump corresponds to high L-value (1977Se04). A large part of the cross section is due to h{-11/2} single-particle strength 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Level proposed by 1994Ba01, based on placements of 336 and 566 transitions. The level is considered uncertain (evaluators) since both these |g rays reported by 1994Ba01 are likely to be complex, as suggested by other studies. This level is not included in the Adopted dataset. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Level proposed by 1994Ba01 as the 31/2- member of f{-7/2} band. It is considered uncertain (evaluators) since main 591|g deexcites a 591 level and firm evidence for placement from a 3919 level is not given by 1994Ba01. This level is not included in the Adopted dataset. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (37/2-)
level_comment:
$1994Ba01 propose that 37/2- member of this band is at 4605 deexciting through a 637|g to 33/2- level at 3968 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from |g|g(|q), Coul. ex. and measured conversion coefficients. 
MOMM1$Others: from g-factor: 0.76 {I5} (1987Be08), 0.81 {I6} (1987By02) 
MOME2$Other: -1.25 {I20} (1978LeZA). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from E2 |g to 2+, member of g.s. band. 
BE2$B(E2) (from 334~keV (2+) level)=0.96 {I10}. 
MOMM1$g-factor/g-factor(2+)=1.60 {I12} (1993Va10) from |g(|q,H,t). The authors state the value to be consistent between their number of different measurements but is too large as compared with earlier measured as well as theoretical values. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from DSA in {+150}Sm(n,n'|g) E=1.3~MeV (1993Ju04). See 1993Ju01 for various values from Doppler broadening techniques. 
J$from E1 |g's to 2+, 4+. 
BE3$From Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from E1 |g to 0+. 
T$from DSA in {+150}Sm(n,n'|g) E=1.3~MeV (1993Ju04). See 1993Ju01 for various values from Doppler broadening techniques. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from E2 |g to 4+, member of g.s. band; not 2+ to 5+ from (n,|g): av res. 
MOMM1$g-factor/g-factor(2+)=1.14 {I34} (1993Va10) from |g(|q,H,t). See comment on 4+ level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$this level was observed in |b-decay studies of {+150}Sm and was adopted by 1976Ba18. All transitions assigned to this level were observed by 1966Sm03. 
J$from E1 |g's to 1- and 3-. 
$370.8 and 676.8 gammas not adopted following {+149}Sm(n,|g):high resolution 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$from E2 |g to 2+ and E1 |g to 3-. Confirmed by 1969Re11 through |g(|q) studies. 
$475.9 |g not adopted following {+149}Sm(n,|g):high resolution 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$from (E2+E0) |g to 4+ and |g's to 2+,3+,4+,6+; not consistent with (2-,5-) from {+149}Sm(n,|g) av res. (1970Bu19) 
$168.2, 223.5 and 393.9 |g's not adopted following {+149}Sm(n,|g):high resolution 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$3-,4-,(2-),(5-) from (n,|g) av res. Excited in (p,t) so probably not 2-,4-. Possible 565|g to 2+ so J|=5. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J$(E1) |g to 6+ in (|a,xn|g), |g to 5- in (|a,2n|g) establish J=(5- 6-,7-). Assumed member of K=0 octupole band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J$E1 |g's to 3- and 5- 
$1045.9, 135.16 gammas not adopted following {+149}Sm(n,|g):high resolution 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Primary |g to level of this energy seen in (n,|g) E=res, but not in (n,|g) E=th. However, 510- and 761-keV |g's observed by 1966Sm03 in (n,|g) can be placed here. 
J$from (n,|g) E=resonance (1974Be37). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1(-)
level_comment:
J$|b{+-} from (1-) (log| {Ift}=7.4) allows J=0,1,2. Two |g's to 0+ disallow J=0. log| {Ift}>8.6 for several |b{+-} decays to 2+ levels indicate 2+ not likely thus requiring |g decays to 0+ states to be M2. |b{+-} decays to other 1- states have log| {Ift}=7.3 or 7.5 making an assignment of 1(-) reasonable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$This level established in (d,d'), (p,t) and (n,|g) E=res. In (n,|g) E=th, 1966Sm03 see several of the |g rays deexciting it. 
J$L(d,d')=4 and E1 |g to 3-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5)+
level_comment:
J$5+ from |g(|q) aligned and E2(+M1) |g's to 4+,6+. 1974Be37 suggest J|p=3+,4+ in (n,|g) res. J|p=2+,5+ from (n,|g) av res. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4(+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$J from |g(|q) aligned, |p from 3+,4+ in (n,|g) av res and res. 
E$1963Gr18 see primary |g ray to this level in (n,|g) E=th. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
$Level fed by primary |g ray in (n,|g) E=th. 
J$J|p=(3+,4+) in (n,|g) av res, (3+,5+) in |g(|q) aligned, and |<3 from |g's to 1-,2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: ( LE 3)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$a level at this energy was first proposed by 1965Gu03 and tentatively assigned by 1968Ku10 on the basis of energy fits. 
J$the log| {Ift} value (8.0) calculated for electron capture to this level is consistent with those for capture to other 0+ and 2+ levels in {+150}Sm, suggesting that J for this level is |<3, assuming that J=(0) for the g.s. of 12.8-h {+150}Eu. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
E$this level was reported in studies of |b decay to {+150}Sm and was adopted by 1963Gr18 who observed transitions which could be assigned to it. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
J$from adopted levels. 1969Re11 find that |g(|q) for the 505-keV |g ray from this state is consistent with a 6+ to 4+ E2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
E$this level was observed in |b decay studies of {+150}Sm and was adopted by 1976Ba18. All transitions assigned to this level were observed by 1966Sm03. 
J$from E1 transitions to 3- and 1- states. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$level suggested in {+150}Pm |b{+-} decay. 
J$based on multipolarity of the 1380.3-keV transition to the 333.96-keV, 2+, level and photon branching to 0+ and 1- levels. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4,5)-
level_comment:
E$from 1963Gr18 and 1969Re11. 
J$1969Re11 assign 3+,4+ to this level through |g(|q) studies. Accepted values are from |g-deexcitation (1976Ba18). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Primary |g to level of this energy seen in (n,|g) res but not in (n,|g) E=th. However, 510- and 761-keV |g's observed by 1966Sm03 can be placed here on basis of energy fit. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$the statement that the 2035 level is populated in (n,|g)therm is only as valid as is the assumption that the 1261.99 {I3} |g ray in |e decay and the 1263.2 {I6} |g ray in (n,|g)therm are the same. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5+)
level_comment:
$1969Re11 report primary |g ray feeding a level of this energy. 
J$1969Re11 determine J|p=5+ from directional anisotropy of primary |g-ray feeding level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3,5)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$1969Re11 assigned (3,5) on basis of directional anisotropy studies. There was doubt as to the |p assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Adopted level. Possible primary |g ray (1969Ra10). 1963Gr18 see a 2949-keV |g ray which gives 2949~keV for the energy of what is probably the same level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_comment:
E$from Adopted Levels. 1963Gr18 get S(n)=7983~keV {I4}. 
J$from 1954Ro25. Capture of polarized neutrons by polarized {+149}Sm nuclei. 1984MuZY indicate that thermal neutron capture in {+149}Sm is predominantly due to a 4- resonance. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)=1.35 {I3} (1987Ra01); |m=+0.77 {I5} (1989Ra17); Q=-1.3~{I2} (2005St24); g=0.381 {I27} (1987Be08); 0.407 {I32} (1987By02); for a recent compilation of |m and Q, see also 2005St24 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2) (from 334~keV (2+) level)=0.051 {I5} from singles data. 
T$branching from {+150}Eu |e decay (36.9~y). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
BE2$B(E2) (from 334~keV (2+) level)=0.96 {I10} from singles data, 0.68 {I15} from coincidence data. 1968Ve01 get 0.9 {I3} using inelastic |a scattering. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$branching from {+150}Pm |b{+-} decay 
BE2$Authors value of 0.019 {I5} assumed branching(1046|g)=1.00 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same as 1603 {I4} in (p,t), as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2)+
level_comment:
E$this level is likely the same as 1833.01 {I3} populated in reactions, and as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same as 2294 {I5} in (p,p'),(d,d') as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same as 2715 {I4} in (d,p) and other reactions, as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+,3-)
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same as tentative 2861 {I7} in reactions, as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
E$this level is likely the same as 2880.9 {I5} in (|g,|g'), as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
E$this level may be the same as tentative 2937 {I20} in reactions, as listed in {+150}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g fast timing measurement (2021Ba35). Value is weighted average of |t= 79 ps {I8} using 1324-334|g cascade and |t=82 ps {I9} using 1736-344|g cascade. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
$ <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.054 fm {I9} (2004An14 evaluation) 
MOMM1$Others: 0.368~{I3} (1985Dy01),-0.3625~{I17} (1985Al06,1986Al33), -0.3630~{I5} (1981Do07), 0.355~{I15} (1971Ro21). 1989Ra17 evaluation adopted value from 1981Do07 
MOMM1$crossed-beam LASER fluorescence method (1990En01). Others: Atomic-beam resonance fluorescence method (1981Do07,1985Dy01,1985Al06, 1986Al33), EPR technique (1971Ro21). 
MOME2$crossed-beam LASER fluorescence method (1990En01). Others: Atomic-beam resonance fluorescence method: 0.67~{I7} (1985Dy01), +0.65~{I15} (1985Al06,1986Al33), +0.67~{I7} (1981Do07). 
$|D<r{+2}>({+151}Sm-{+152}Sm)=0.279~fm{+2}~{I12} (1985Dy01), 0.269~fm{+2}~{I25} (1985Al06), 0.262~fm{+2}~{I10} (1984Ea01) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+151}Sm-{+144}Sm)=0.974~fm{+2}~{I25} (1986Al33) 
$|D<r{+2}>({+150}Sm-{+151}Sm)=0.149~fm{+2} (1990En01) 
$|D<r{+2}> measured by LASER spectroscopic studies (1985Al06,1986Al33,1985Dy01,1984Ea01). Review of hyperfine data: 1995Ga38 
J$spin measured by EPR method (1971Ro21). M1 |g between g.s. and 4.82 level and L(d,t)=1 for 4.82 level give negative parity for both levels and J=3/2 for 4.82 level 
T$average of 93~y~{I8} (1968Re04) and 87~y~{I9} (1965Fl02). Others: 1955Me52 1952Ru10, 1952Ka26, 1950In01 
$Configurations: mainly 5/2[523] and 3/2[532]. The 3/2[521] component does not contribute much as suggested by the non-observation of the 91, 5/2- level in {+153}Sm with 3/2[521] configuration in {+151}Sm(t,p) reaction (2005Bu21) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E$main contribution in (t,p) is from 65.8, 7/2- level as suggested by L=0 transfer. 
J$L(t,p)=0 from 7/2- target 
T$B(E2) in Coul. ex., |d(65.8|g) and branching. Others: |g|g(t) (1971Ho09,1962Ch06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
T$|g|g(t) (1971Ho09) 
J$M1 |g's to 3/2- and 5/2-. J=3/2 not allowed by 275|g(|q) from 345, 3/2+ level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2)+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$PAC method 
J$E1 |g to 7/2- and |g from (13/2)+. L(d,t)=3 assignment for this level must be incorrect. See 1973Ne16 for discussion of this discrepancy 
T$|g|g(t) (1971Ho09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$IPAC method. |m=0.52 (1971Be23) corrected for J=3/2. See also 2005St24 compilation of moments 
J$M1 |g's to 3/2- and 5/2-, |g|g(|q) and |g(|q) in {+151}Pm |b{+-} 
T$|b|g(t) (1965Fo08). Others: 0.48~ns~{I6} from |g(ce)(t) (1971An07), 1971Ho09, 1962Ch06. From B(E2) in Coul. ex., |d(105|g) and branching T{-1/2}=0.62~ns~{I23} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
$Doublet in (p,d) 
J$L({+3}He,|a)=6 and band (i{-13/2}) assignment. See also J{+|p} comment for 531 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
MOMM1$IPAC method. |m=0.57 (1971Be23) corrected for J=5/2 and T{-1/2}=0.38~ns. See also 2005St24 compilation of moments 
J$E1 |g's to 3/2- and 7/2- 
T$|b|g(t) (1971An07). Others: 0.76~ns~{I35} (quoted by 1971An07 from an other group), 1971Ho09 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$M1 |g's to 3/2- and 5/2-. In (d,t), L=2+3 for the 167.7, 168.4 doublet. L=2 most probably corresponds to 167.7, 5/2+ level whereas L=3 corresponds to 168.4 level 
T$B(E2) in Coul. ex., |d(168|g) and branching. Other: |g|g(t) (1971Ho09) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=AP
level_comment:
J$L(d,t)=3; L(t,p)=0 from 7/2- target; |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in {+151}Pm |b{+-} 
T$B(E2) in Coul. ex., |d(209|g) and adopted branching 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$L(p,d)=L(d,t)=L({+3}He,|a)=5 and |g to (13/2)+. Spectroscopic strengths agree with 11/2[505] assignment 
T$|g(t) in (|a,3n|g) (1973Co34) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) in Coul. ex. and direct excitation in Coul. ex. from 5/2- 
T$B(E2) in Coul. ex., mult=E2 for 295|g and adopted Branching 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$In single particle reactions assignment to this level is based on L transfers. Uncertain doublet in (p,d) 
J$|g(|q) of 202|g and |g|g(|q) in {+151}Pm |b{+-}. L=2 in (d,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Doublet in (p,d) 
J$E1 |g's to 3/2- and 5/2-, |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in {+151}Pm |b{+-} 
T$from (|b)(ce)(t) (1977Bu12). Others: 1971An07, 1965Fo08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$(E1) |g following p-wave capture in {+150}Sm g.s. gives J{+|p}|<5/2+. Absence in s-wave capture favors 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$E1 |g's to 3/2-, 5/2-. 441|g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in {+151}Pm |b{+-} 
T$(|b)(ce)(t) (1977Bu12). Other: 1971An07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$L=2+0 in (p,d). L=0 probably corresponds to the 502.29 level and L=2 to the 505.3 level. (E1) primary |g following p-wave capture in (n,|g) supports J{+|p}=5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_comment:
J$(E1) primary |g following p-wave capture in {+150}Sm g.s. gives J{+|p}|<5/2+. Absence in s-wave capture favors 5/2+; however, positive parity is not supported by its population in Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_comment:
E$this level may be populated in {+151}Pm |b{+-} decay, also; if 718|g and 753|g are treated as doublets there 
J$|g's to 3/2+, 3/2-, and (7/2)-; possible (E1) primary |g from 1/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$(E1) |g to 5/2-. In particle transfer reactions the level corresponds to either of the two levels near 822~keV. L(p,d)=2 gives positive parity for one of these levels 
T$(|b)(ce)(t) (1971An07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J$(E1) primary |g following p-wave capture in {+150}Sm g.s. gives J{+|p}|<5/2+. Absence in s-wave capture favors 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2(+)
level_comment:
$Doublet in (p,d) at 988~{I10} with L=2+4. The L=2 component probably corresponds to 964 level and the L=4 to 988 level 
J$from 796|g(|q) in {+151}Pm |b{+-} 
$|g's known from {+151}Pm |b{+-} only 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+,9/2+)
level_comment:
$Doublet in both reactions. See comment for 964 level. In ({+3}He,|a) the second component probably corresponds to 1016 level 
J$L=2+4 for doublet in (p,d). L=4 probably corresponds to 988 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$doublet in (p,d) at 1140~{I15} 
J$L=2+4 or 2+5 in (p,d) gives J{+|p}=5/2+, 3/2+ for one component and 9/2+, 7/2+ or 11/2-, 9/2- for the second 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+,3/2+)
level_comment:
$Doublet in (p,d) 
J$L=2+5 for the doublet in (p,d). L=5 probably corresponds to 1380 level. Primary |g from 1/2+ in (n,|g) supports 3/2+, 5/2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$doublet in (p,d) and ({+3}He,|a). E(level) from (t,p) 
J$L=(2+4) in (p,d) and L=4,5 in ({+3}He,|a) suggests that there are at least two levels, one with J{+|p}=(3/2+5/2+) and the other with J{+|p}=9/2+, 7/2+, 11/2-, 9/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
J$L=2+5 in (p,d) suggests a doublet with J{+|p}=3/2+, 5/2+ for one level and J{+|p}=9/2-, 11/2- for the other 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (27/2)
level_comment:
J$|g to (25/2) and band assignment 
T$from analysis of delayed |g-ray intensities, 1992Ch43 report T{-1/2}=23~ns~{I4} for a 2606 level deexciting by a 693.6|g. But no such |g is reported in their later work (1994Ba01) and by 1994Kh01. It is possible that this |g is the same as the 698.8|g 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E,J$center of a wide structure. In (p,d) L=(2+5) or (2+4) for the structure suggests presence of 5/2+ and 11/2- states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |b|g(t) (1965Fo08). Others: 0.48~ns~{I6} (ce|g(t), 1971An07), 1971Ho09, 1962Ch06 
J$|g|g(|q) with either 105|g or 100|g consistent with 3/2, not with 5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$|bce(t) (1977Bu12). Others: 1971An07, 1965Fo08 
J$|g(|q) and |g|g(|q) data for 345|g, 340|g, 275|g and 240|g give 3/2, not 5/2 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2+,5/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
E$this level may be a doublet (see 'adopted levels') 
J$718|g(|q) and |g|g(|q) with 753|g, 718|g, 654|g give 3/2, not 5/2. But this conclusion may be questionable since the (n,|g) results show that 718|g and 752|g may be doublets, the other components deexciting an 822 level. 
T$|b|g(t) (1971An07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-&3/2-
level_comment:
E$doublet corresponding to g.s. and 4.821 levels (as in 'adopted levels') 
$Non-observation of the 91, 5/2- level with 3/2[521] configuration in {+151}Sm(t,p){+153}Sm suggests that {+151}Sm g.s. does not have a large admixture of the 3/2[521] configuration. The 5/2[523] and 3/2[532] orbits form the dominant components of the {+151}Sm g.s. configuration 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
$Relative L=0 strength=100 
E$probable doublet corresponding to 65.826, 7/2- and 69.703, 5/2- levels (as in 'adopted levels'), but L(t,p)=0 suggests main contribution from 65.826, 7/2- level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)&3/2(+)
level_comment:
E,J$2005Bu21 quote only (3/2-) component, but from energy considerations in 'Adopted Levels', the level in (t,p) could be a doublet 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (19/2+)
level_comment:
A 185.1G DEEXCITES THIS LEVEL BY 1994Ba01. THIS G MAY BE THE SAME AS 186.1 (1994Kh01) FROM 2898 LEVEL 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (21/2-)
level_comment:
A 308.1G DEEXCITES THIS LEVEL BY 1994Ba01. A DOUBLET AT THIS ENERGY IS SHOWN DEEXCITING OTHER LEVELS BY 1994Kh01 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g|g(|q) for either 295|g or the 229|g support 9/2, not|<7/2 
$B(E2)|^=0.45~{I4} (E(d)=5~MeV), 0.48 (E(d)=12~MeV) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$1974GrYX report levels at 495 and 520, both with L=0 whereas 1983Ga07 report a doublet at 505~{I10} with L=2+0 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$(2+4) or (2+5) for the unresolved doublet 
S$0.07, 0.36 for J{+|p}=5/2+ and 7/2+. 0.09, 0.19 for J{+|p}=5/2+ and 11/2- 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
E$center of a wide bump in the region 2100-3800 
L$DWBA fits agree with L=2+5 and L=2+4 for this group 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
$Center of a wide group in the region 3800-8000 
L$DWBA fits agree with L=2+5 and L=2+4 for the group 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$from 1983Ga07 
E$it is possible that 702 and 746 levels from 1980Re05 correspond to 765 level from 1983Ga07 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L,S$from 1983Ga07. Unresolved doublet at 1690 from 1983Ga07 identified with 1639 level from 1980Re05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
L$4,5 for unresolved doublet at 1840 (1983Ga07) 
S$0.82, 0.34 for J{+|p}=712+ and 11/2-, respectively (1983Ga07) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: Y
level_comment:
T$ From 2015Be23, deduced from measured radioactivity and concentration of {+151}Sm in the sample. 
J$ From Adopted Levels of {+151}Sm in the ENSDF database. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
MOMM1$From g=+0.411~{I19}, a weighted average of 0.419~{I25} (muonic atom, 1967At04) and 0.40~{I3} (13-y Eu |e decay, 1992De29) 
MOME2$Weighted average of -1.702~{I17} (1978Ya11) and -1.666~{I16} (1979Po04) 
J E2 |g to 0+ 
T$Weighted average of T{-1/2}=1.396~ns~{I8} from 13-y |e decay and 1.420~ns~{I12} from B(E2)=3.451~{I8} with |a=1.155~{I17}. The B(E2) value is a weighted average of values from Coulomb excitation and muonic atom. Other: 1.47~ns~{I4} from 4.12-min Pm |b{+-} decay 
Isotope shift: 1995Be19, 1994Ji08 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
MOMM1$Other: +1.22~{I15} (1972Ku10) 
J E2 |g to 2+ level; |s(|q), analyzing power (inelastic scattering) 
T$From Coulomb excitation. Other: 60~ps~{I5} from 13-y Eu |e decay 
MOME2 From Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E0 component in transition to 2+ 
T$From Coulomb excitation. Other: 7~ps~{I5} from 13-y Eu |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E1 |g to 0+ 
T$Weighted average of 28.2~fs~{I24} from (|g,|g'), 20~fs~{I3} from (n,n'|g), and 19.9~fs~{I7} from 13-y Eu |e decay. The (|g,|g') value comes from |G{-|g0}=0.0073~{I6} eV with |G{-|g0}/|G=0.451~{I6} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E0 component in transition to 4+ 
T$From Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E1 |g's to 2+ and 4+ 
T$Others: 33~fs~{I+8-6} from (n,|g), <5~ps from 13-y Eu |e decay, <16~ps from 4.1-min Pm |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L(t,p)=0. |g|g(|q) in 9.3-hr |e decay is consistent only with J=0 
T$From 4.1-min Pm |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E2 |g to 0+ 
T$From Coulomb excitation. Other: <4~ps from 13-y Eu |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$M1+E2 |g's to 2+ and 4+ 
T$From {+151}Sm(n,|g). Other: <6~ps from 13-y {+152}Eu |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E0 component in transition to 2+ 
T$From 4.1-min Pm |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E2 |g to 2+. |g to 5- 
T$From Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$E1 |g's to 2+. |g|g(|q) in 13-y Eu |e decay rules out J=1 and 3 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_comment:
J$L(p,t)=0 
T$The experimental values are discrepant. T{-1/2}=8~ps~{I5} is reported in 4.1-min Pm |b{+-} decay, and 0.123~ps~{I+45-29} is reported in (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$From 792|g(E) and 792|g(|q) in (n,n'|g). Assigned as the bandhead of a K{+|p}=0+ band in Coulomb excitation 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=LT
level_comment:
J$|g's to 1- and 3-. log| {Ift}=7.0 from 1+. Assigned in Coulomb excitation as the 2+ member of a K{+|p}=0+ band built on the 1659 level but no other band members have been identified 
T$From 4.1-min Pm |b{+-} decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$|g's to 2+ and 4+. Member of a K{+|p}=1- band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J$|g's to 3+, 3-, and 4+. Assigned in Coulomb excitation to |a K{+|p}=2- band with bandhead at 1649. From an angular distribution measurement in (|a,2n|g) the 1455|g to 4+ is assigned as M1+E2, in conflict with the suggested band assignment 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+ and 4+. Assigned in Coulomb excitation as |a member of a K{+|p}=2+ band with bandhead at 1768, but no other band members have been identified 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
J$|g's to 5- and 8+. Member of K{+|p}-5- band. Note that J{+|p}=(7-) from (t,|a) based on |a comparison of experimental and calculated spectroscopic factors for members of a K{+|p}=5- rotational band with configuration (|p 5/2[413])(|n 5/2[532]) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+,1,2
level_comment:
E$(n,n'|g) reports a level at 2127.17 deexciting via a single transition with E|g=2005.38~{I7}. In 4.12-M Pm |b{+-} decay, a level at 2127.4 is postulated with a 2007.0~{I5} transition along with 616 and 1317|g's. The evaluator assumes that the 2005 and 2007|g's correspond to the same transition and that there is just one level at 2127; however, based on branching in the decay, the 1317|g should have been seen in (n,n'|g) 
J$log| {Ift}=7.0 from 1+. |g's to 2+ 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 18+
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$|g's to 16+. Member of K{+|p}=0+ g.s. band 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
MOME2$Weighted average of -1.666~{I16} (1979Po04) and -1.702~{I17} (1978Ya11) Other: -1.66 {I5} (1975Ba72) (reevaluated in 1980Ba08) 
BE2$Weighted average of 3.448~{I26} (1979Po04) and 3.457~{I9} (1978Ya11) Other: 3.32 {I12} (1970Hi03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 14+
level_comment:
E$Assigned by the authors as the 14+ member of the K{+|p}=0+ |b band. In Coulomb excitation, this band member is found at 3292 and the 2976 level is assigned as the 14+ member of a band with unknown K 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
T$From Doppler broadening of the 842|g, 1993Ju01 report T{-1/2}=49~fs~{I+13-10} and 19~fs~{I+9-6} from two different analyses. the adopted value is 20.5~fs~{I16} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
T$From Doppler broadening of the 919|g, 1993Ju01 report T{-1/2}=33~fs~{I+8-6} and 8~fs~{I+5-4} from two different analyses. T{-1/2}=27~fs~{I5} is the adopted value from (n,n'|g) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
J$J{+|p}=0+ is established from 792|g(E) and 792|g(|q) (2008Ku10) 
T$From priv comm communicated to the evaluator by P. E. Garrett. this replaces the value of 168~fs~{I+90-46} given in 2008Ku10 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
T$Values from pulsed-beam measurements (ns): 1.45~{I6} (1959Bi10), 1.41~{I6} (1966As03), 1.47~{I5} (1967Wo06), 1.44~{I3} (1968Ri09) 
G$From Adopted Levels. Values from Coulomb excitation are +0.31~{I3} (1958Go72, +0.28~{I3} (1967Wo06), and +0.30~{I3} (1972Ku10). These values are all lower than the adopted value. See discussion in 1992De29 
BE2$OTHERS: 3.40~{I15} (1960El07), 3.53~{I10} (1961Be43), 3.31~{I4} (1970KaZK), 3.39~{I3} (1972Sa42), 3.46~{I11} (1973Br02), 3.46~{I5} (1974Sh12), 3.47~{I7} (1974Wo01). these are the values quoted with uncertainties <5%. For a listing of other values, see 2001Ra27 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
G Others: +0.306 {I38} (1972Ku10) 
BE4$Weighted average of 0.20~{I8} (1971St24), 0.12~{I5} (1972Sa42), 0.14~{I7} (1973Br02, 1974Br31), 0.21~{I9} (1974Wo01), 0.21~{I4} (1977Fi01) 
$B(E2)(2+ to 4+)=1.90~{I7}. Weighted average of 1.89~{I9} (1965Go06), 1.98~{I16} (1970Sa09), 1.87~{I13} (1974Le09) 
T$Weighted average (ps) of 58.9~{I18} (1971Di02), 57.4~{I9} (1972Ru07), 57.7~{I8} (2000Kl14). B(E2) gives T{-1/2}=55.2~ps~{I23} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)(4+ to 6+)=1.66~{I17} (1970Sa09) 
T$Weighted average (ps) of 10.0~{I5} (1971Di02), 10.2~{I3} (1972Ru07), 10.40~{I21} (2000Kl14). B(E2) gives T{-1/2}=10.4~ps~{I11} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$Weighted average of 7.5~ps~{I6} (2000Kl14) and 7.4~ps~{I5} from B(E2) with I|g(810|g)=20.8% {I4} 
BE2$From 1972McYT. Others: 0.023~{I5} (1968Ve01), 0.020~{I3} (1977Wo03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$B(E2)(2+ to 4+)|?0.0095 (1969Fr10) 
T$From 2000Kl14. Note that B(E2)(2+ to 4+) gives T{-1/2}|?4.9~ps 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
BE3$Weighted average of 0.14~{I5} (1966Se06), 0.14~{I3} (1968Ke04), 0.12~{I3} (1968Ve01), 0.135~{I+19-18} (1977Wo03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From 2000Kl14 
BE2$From T{-1/2} and I|g(1086|g)=40.65% {I12}, one gets B(E2)=0.070~{I9}. The measured values are 0.068~{I12} (1965Yo04), 0.119~{I24} (1966Se06), 0.085~{I15}(1968Ve01), 0.082~{I6} (1972McYT), 0.092~{I5} (1977Wo03). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$From 2000Kl14. Others(ps): 3.10~{I30} (1971Di02), 3.0~{I5} (1972Ru07), 3.33~{I27} (1977Ke06), 3.08~{I17} (1977Si18) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E$There is some evidence for population of this state, but the |a groups below the 7759|a are weak. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T from 1988Ka21. Others: 1.40 ns {I2} (1992De29), 1.35 ns {I5} (1972El20), 1.41 ns {I4} (1968Ku03), 1.36 ns {I6} (1966Mc07), 1.37 ns {I4} (1963Fo02), 1,42 ns {I4} (1962Ba38), 1.40 ns {I10} (1955Su64) 
g-factor: 0.40 {I3} (1992De29). Others: 0.30 {I3} (1971Do17), 0.35 {I3} (1962Ba38) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T from 1993Se08. Other: 42 ps {I18} (1972El20) 
J |g|g(|q) data (1970He29,1973Ka05) are consistent with J=4 but not with J=0,1,3; possible J=2 is ruled out by ce data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_comment:
T$From the intensity of the K-positon line to that of the 1408|g, 1972Sv02 deduce T{-1/2}=27~fs. For data and calculations see authors' paper. this value of T{-1/2} gives B(M2)(W.u.)|?10 for the 1408|g and|?900 for the 444|g, both much larger than the RUL limit of <1. |d(1408|g) is an average from eight authors, so the discrepancy May lie with the value of T{-1/2}. This value of T{-1/2} is not ADOPTED 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
(e,e'): |b{-2}=0.286 {I2} (1977Na01), 0.287 {I3} (1972Be26) 
(p,p'): |b{-2}=0.22 (1993Pe16), 0.241 {I12} (1989Ob02), 0.251 (1983Pa08), 0.25 {I2} (1971Ba19), 0.250 (1971Kr10) 
(d,d'): |b{-2}=0.236 (1983Ha16), 0.25 (1975Ba64), 0.26 (1974Ba78), 0.25 (1973Tr03) 
({+3}He,{+3}He'): |b{-2}=0.238 (1979Pa08), 0.302 (1977Ea01) 
(|a,|a'): |b{-2}=0.200 {I10} (1989Ob02), 0.25 (1968He24) 
B(E2)=3.45 {I6} (1977Na01) 
B(E2)=3.43 {I4} from (e,e') and muonic quadrupole hyperfine splitting (1983Re04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
(e,e'): |b{-4}=0.092 {I2} (1977Na01), 0.070 {I3} (1972Be26) 
(p,p'): |b{-4}=0.074 (1993Pe16), 0.062 {I6} (1989Ob02), 0.048 (1983Pa08), 0.050 {I16} (1971Ba19) 
(d,d'): |b{-4}=0.041 (1983Ha16), 0.048 (1974Ba78), 0.047 (1973Tr03) 
({+3}He,{+3}He'): |b{-4}=0.048 (1979Pa08), 0.038 (1977Ea01) 
(|a,|a'): |b{-4}=0.040 {I4} (1989Ob02), 0.048 (1968He24) 
B(E4)=0.210 {I13} (1977Na01) 
Not observed in ({+12}C,{+12}C') 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_comment:
(e,e'): |b{-6}=0.010 {I2} (1977Na01) 
(p,p'): |b{-6}=-0.030 (1993Pe16), -0.005 {I1} (1989Ob02), -0.011 (1983Pa08) 
({+3}He,{+3}He'): |b{-6}=-0.009 (1979Pa08) 
(|a,|a'): |b{-6}=-0.011 {I1} (1989Ob02), -0.012 (1968He24) 
B(E6)=0.0114 {I7} (1977Na01) 
Projectiles: e, p, d, {+3}He, |a 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E,J unresolved from 1221-keV J|p=5- state. DWBA analysis suggests 2+ state at 1226-keV (1989Ob02). Seen only in (|a,|a') (1989Ob02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E from (p p'), E=1726 from (d,d'). Two levels are known from decay: 1728.27-keV J|p=6+ and 1730.205-keV J|p=3-. Both experiments are probably exciting both known levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_comment:
Multiple line from (d,d'), suggested as J|p=3- and 4+ (1968Ve01); possibly the 1764.32-keV J|p=5- level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from |g|g(t) (2011Cr05), weighted average of 12 independent measurements allowed by the four BaF{-2} detector system, and with gates on 121.8- and 244.7-keV |g rays. Quoted uncertainty includes statistical as well as systematic uncertainties. Using their measurements and previous 35 measurements from 1955 to 1992 with different methods, 2011Cr05 evaluated the half-life as 1.416 ns {I6}. Authors also evaluated the result as 1.412 ns {I13} by taking average of values, deduced from each method separately. They also noted that 1.396 ns {I7} from 1988Ka21 (Nucl. Instr. Meth. A271, 507) dominates the dataset. By omitting this datum from the averaging procedure, 2011Cr05 obtained a value of 1.426 ns {I6}. In various data evaluations, values are: 1.428 ns {I17} (2011Ra27: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 1), and 1.403 ns {I11} in {+152}Sm Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, where in both the evaluations, available data from 1955 to 1992 were considered; 1.4159 ns {I11} (2016Pr01: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 107, 1), where in addition to previous values from 1955 to 1992, value of 1.416 ns {I11} from 2014Pl01 (Phys. Rev. C89, 021302(R)) was also used, but missed including the 2011Cr05 measurement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from fast-timing measurements (2022Ms01). Authors mention only that start and stop gates were transitions populating and depopulating the 2+, but do not provide specific transitions. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
$<r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.0925 fm 68 (2013An02,evaluation) 
J J from atomic-beam, magnetic resonance (1960Ca05); |p=+ from M1 mult of 414.9 |g from 1/2+ state, also L=2 and L+1 (from A{-y}) in (pol d,t) 
J 1971Be41, 1972Ka07, and 1973Ga29 estimated the configuration to include 3/2[651] (62% to 84%) and 3/2[402] (15% to 22%). 
T$Thirteen of the fifteen available values with uncertainties <1.0 h separate into two non-overlapping groups, namely: the six higher values of 47.0 h {I3} (1954Le08), 47.1 h {I1} (1958Co76), 46.8 h {I1} (1961Wy01), 47.1 h {I1} (1962Ca24), 46.75 h {I9} (1970Ch09), 46.70 h {I5} (1989Ab05); the seven lower values 46.2 h {I1} (1961Gr18), 46.27 h {I1} (1987Co04), 46.2853 h {I14} (1992Un01,1994Co02,2002Un02), 46.285 h {I4} (1997BoZZ,1998Bo18), 46.274 h {I7} (1999Sc12, which replaces 46.29 h {I4} of 1996ScZX), 46.28 h {I7} (2004Sc04), 46.34 h {I22} (2009Fr09); and two intermediate values 46.5 h {I5} (1963Ho15), 46.44 h {I8} (1971Ba28). For this whole set of fifteen values, the weighted average is 46.2854 {I56} with a reduced-|h{+2} of 19. The evaluator has chosen to use the three values from metrology laboratories: 1998Bo18, 1999Sc12, and 2002Un02 (also 1992Un01 and 1994Co02). The weighted average is 46.2849 {I13} and the reduced-|h{+2}=1.25. In this average the value of 2002Un02 has a relative weight of 86%. Adopted here is the rounded-off weighted average with uncertainty incresed to reduce the 86% weight to 50%. 
T$others: 47 h {I1} (1942Ku03), 46 h (1946Mi06), 46.5 h {I10} (1952Ru10), 46.7 h {I16} (1958Gu09), 45 h {I8} (1960Wi10), 45.6 h {I16} (1989Po21), 45.8 h {I17} (1999Po32), 46.51 h {I24} (evaluation,2004Wo02) 
MOMM1$-0.0216 {I1} from 2014StZZ compilation, based on measurement of 1968Wa10 (by atomic bean magnetic resonance). Other values in 2014StZZ: -0.0257 {I14} (1984Ea02) and -0.0209 {I28} (1990En01) (same methods as listed for Q moments below for the respective references). 
MOME2$+1.30 {I12} from 2016St14 compilation, based on measurement of 1990En01 (laser resonance fluorescence spectroscopy). 2016St14 also quotes +1.26 {I13} based on 1984Ea02 (atomic beam with laser fluorescence spectroscopy) 
|D<r{+2}>({+152}Sm-{+153}Sm)=0.0963 {I16} fm{+2} (1984Ea02) and 0.099 fm{+2} (1990En01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
The small value of the energy spacing in the ground-state band results from the expected strong Coriolis coupling between the ground-state band and higher lying positive-parity orbitals, principally 5/2[642] and 1/2[660], arising from the i{-13/2} spherical shell-model state (1971Bu16). 
J From band structure and L=2 in (p,d) and ({+3}He,|a). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J From L=5 from (p,d), and (|a,{+3}He) and L=5 and L+1 (from a{-y}) in (pol d,t) 
T From 1971KiZC in {+153}Sm IT decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2+)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E Comment in 1997GoZN suggests that their re-analysis of (n,|g) data does not support this level. 
J From (n,|g) data J=1/2, 3/2, or 5/2. Possible assignment as 5/2[642] Nilsson state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J From M1,E2 |g to 5/2+ level and |g's to 3/2+ and 9/2+. Possibly the 7/2+ member of the 5/2[642] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J From M1(+E2+E0) to 3/2+ level. Level at this energy in (d,t) is assigned (5/2+) and L=(4,5) in (p,d), so there may be two levels near this energy. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J From L=2 in (d,t) and (p,d) and primary |g from 1/2+ neutron-capture state. 
J Calculations of 1973Ga29 give 66%, 3/2[402], 20%, 3/2[651], and 10% vibrational state based on 1/2[400]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)+
level_comment:
J From M1 |g's to 3/2+ and 5/2+ levels, |g to 9/2+ level and L=2 from (p,d) and (d,t). L=(0) in (t,p) in conflict with |p 
J 1979Ka11 suggest assignment of 5/2+,5/2[642]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
J$L=(0) in (t,p) from 5/2- target 
E$the level in (t,p) seems different from that populated in (p,d) and ({+3}He,|a) with L=5 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-,11/2-)
level_comment:
J From L=5 in (p,d) and ({+3}He,|a). Assignment of (7/2+) in (d,t) seems erroneous 
E$see comment for 369, (5/2-) level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
J From L=0 in (p,d) and (d,t). 
J Calculation of 1973Ga29 gives 42%, 1/2[400], 34%, 1/2[660], and 20% vibrational state based on 3/2[402]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2)+
level_comment:
J From |g's to (3/2)+ and 7/2+ levels and expected band structure. 
J 1979Ka11 suggest an alternate band assignment of 7/2+,5/2[642]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
J From L=3 in (p,d), (d,t), and (|a,{+3}He) and |g's to 3/2+, 3/2-, (7/2-), and (7/2+) levels. 7/2- in (d,t) is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
J$ L=(2) in (t,p) from 5/2- target; L=(3,4) in (p,d); band member. 9/2+ assignment in (d,t) seems erroneous since there is no evidence for a separate level near this energy. 2005Bu21 point out that L(d,t)=4 may be questionable for a weak group, L=3 may be equally valid giving 7/2- for L+1/2 in (pol d,t)  


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J$ From L=1 in (p,d) and (d,t), L=1 and L-1 (from A{-y}) in (pol d,t) 
J Calculation of 1973Ga29 gives 52%, 1/2[521], 25% vibrational state based on 3/2[521] and 12% vibrational state based on 5/2[523]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)-
level_comment:
E From |g's to 3/2+, 5/2+, and 5/2- levels and expected band structure. Also, L=0+1 in (p,d), 3/2- in (d,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E$From (t,p) 
J$L=0 in (t,p) from 5/2- target. Also L=3 in (p,d). 7/2- assignment in (d,t) is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
E From (n,|g) thermal; other: 1322.1 {I9} from (n,|g) resonance. 
J From feeding by primary |g in average-resonance capture (n,|g), L=2 in (p,d), 3/2+ in (d,t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-,3/2-
level_comment:
J From feeding by primary |g in average-resonance capture (n,|g). L=(2) in (p,d) for 1359 is inconsistent 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+,5/2+
level_comment:
E From (n,|g) resonance; other: 1393.9 {I8} from (n,|g) thermal. 
J From feeding by primary |g in (n,|g), L=2 in (p,d) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-,3/2-)
level_comment:
J From feeding by primary |g in average-resonance capture (n,|g). This conflicts with L=2 in (p,d). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$From the least-squares fit on |g ray energies 
E$Previously, average of values obtained from adding average |g energy to level energy for primary |g's to levels at 35 and 127 keV. The mass evaluation of 2017Wa10 gives S(n)=5868.40 {I13}. 
E 5832.6(3)+35.8+0.1 = 5868.5(3) and 5740.9(3)+127.3+0.1 = 5868.3(3). 
J From s-wave capture in J{+|p}=0+ state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2)-
level_comment:
E$2005Bu21 assigned a dominant configuration of 5/2[523] from results of their (t,p) study. The same assignment is given in 'adopted levels'. The earlier assignment (1998He06) as member of the 1/2[530] band is rejected. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=58 {I6} 
E$rounded value from 'adopted levels' for {+153}Sm, this energy used as reference for obtaining excitation energies above 182.9 keV 
$Relative L=0 strength=55 
$Configuration=3/2[532] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=95 {I7} 
$Relative L=0 strength=100 
E$This level has the strongest L=0 transition, indicating dominant component of configuration is 5/2[523]. The 1/2[530] configuration proposed earlier (1998He06) is not supported by the present (t,p) data 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
E Calculated from |g-ray energy differences. The existence of the 7.53-keV transition was inferred by 1969Sm04. The small value of the energy spacing in the ground-state band results from the expected strong Coriolis coupling between the ground-state band and higher lying positive-parity orbitals, principally 5/2[642] and 1/2[660], arising from the i{-13/2} spherical shell-model state (1971Bu16). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E$from the least-squares fit on |g ray energies 
E Average of values obtained from adding average |g energy to level energy for primary |g's to levels at 35 and 127 keV. The mass evaluation of 2017Wa10 gives S(n)=5868.40 {I13}. 
E 5832.6(3)+35.8+0.1 = 5868.5(3) and 5740.9(3)+127.3+0.1 = 5868.3(3). 
J From s-wave capture in J{+|p}=0+ state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=21 
$ d|s(p,d)/d|s(d,p)=23 (1997GoZN) 
J 1972Ka07 estimated that the g.s. consists of 3/2[651] (|? 84%) and 3/2[402] (|? 15%), with small contributions from the 3/2+ rotational states of the 1/2[400] and 1/2[660] bands. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=17 
$ d|s(p,d)/d|s(d,p)=21.1 (1997GoZN) 
J Adopted J|p is 11/2- with 11/2[505] configuration (1972Ka07), which conflicts with the L value (1965Ke09). 
E$ from 1997GoZN 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=19 
E$2005Bu21 assigned a dominant configuration of 5/2[523] from results of their (t,p) study. The same assignment is given in 'adopted levels'. The earlier assignment (1998He06) as member of the 1/2[530] band is rejected. 
$ d|s(p,d)/d|s(d,p)=1.0 (1997GoZN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (17/2)+
level_comment:
$d|s/d|W=6 |mb/sr 
L Measured |s(|q) is inconsistent with L=8. This suggests possible multistep excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J 1972Ka07 and 1971Be41 estimated the ground state to consist of 3/2[651] (|? 84%) and 3/2[402] (|? 15%), with small contributions from 1/2[660], 3/2[402] and 1/2[400]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_uncertain: S
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$From Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset 
J$From s-wave capture in J{+|p}=0+ state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;STABLE
level_comment:
T The T{-1/2} for two-neutrino double |b{+-} decay to the 2+ level in {+154}Gd is measured to be |> 2.3x10{+18} y (1996De60). This is the same value listed in the tabulation of 2002Tr04. A model calculation of the T{-1/2} for double |b{+-} decay gives 1.0x10{+23} y for two-neutrino mode and 9x10{+24}(m{-n}{+2}) y|*(eV){+2}. 
The change in the nuclear charge radius between {+152}Sm and {+154}Sm can given by either |l or |D<r{+2}> where |l = |D<r{+2}> + c{-1} |D<r{+4}> + c{-2} |D<r{+6}>. |l=0.219 fm{+2} {I10} with the corresponding values |D<r{+2}>=0.231 fm{+2} {I11}, |D<r{+4}>=0.00187 fm{+4} {I9}, and |D<r{+6}>=0.0000126 fm{+6} {I7} from 1990Wa25. Other values: |l=0.221 {I13} (1973Le16), 0.220 {I11} (1981Ne01) and 0.222 {I11} (1997Ji06) and |D<r{+2}>=0.215 {I16} (1974He28), 0.250 {I14} (1979Po04 as quoted in 1983La06), 0.230 {I12} (1980Br15), 0.230 (1985Al06), 0.226 {I12} (1987Bo58), and 0.222 (1990En01). Other: 1989GaZO, 1995Ne12, and 1996La03. |D<r{+2}> for the neutron distribution is 0.27 {I4} (1983Ja06). 
From an analysis of proton-diffraction data using 800-MeV protons, 2004Ko34 deduce r{-BS}=5.24 fm {I9} for the "Black-Sphere" radius, taken to be a measure of the matter distribution. The nuclear radius has been reported as <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.113 fm {I11} (1979Po04) and 5.1143 fm {I9} (1995Fr22 evaluation). From an analysis of data on nuclear rms charge radii, 2004An14 report <r{+2}>{+1/2}=5.111 fm 6, while 2007Li14 recommend 5.120 fm 28. For other values, see 1976Co08 and 1977HoZF in the (|g,|g'),(e,e') Data Set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
The isomer shift is |D<r{+2}>=0.0008 fm{+2} {I5} (1974Ka38) and 0.0012 fm{+2} {I9} [computed from |D<r{+2}>/<r{+2}>(0) of 1970Wh02 and <r{+2}>(0) of 1979Po04]. 
J From E2 |g to 0+ ground state. 
T Weighted average of 3.03 ns {I5} (1967Wo06) and 3.00 ns {I6} (1968Ri09) from Coul. ex. Other: 2.74 ns {I24} (1959Bi10) from Coul. ex. From the B(E2) value of 4.32 {I2}, T{-1/2}=3.01 ns {I4}, with the uncertainty primarily from the 1.5% uncertainty assigned to the theoretical |a. 
MOME2 From 1989Ra17 evaluation and 2005St24 compilation and based on muonic atom study (1979Po04). Others: -1.3 {I5} (1969Wh04), -1.5 {I3} (1982Cl03), and 1.42 (from ratio given by 1975Ro24 and converted to actual value by 1978LeZA). 
MOMM1 From 1989Ra17 evaluation and 2005St24 compilation and based on data of 1969Wh04 in Coul. ex. For other values, see the Coul. ex. data set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J From E2 |g to 2+ level and band structure. 
T Weighted average of 173 ps {I5} (1972Di06) and 169 ps {I10} (1980Jo08) from Coul. ex. 
MOMM1 From 1989Ra17 evaluation and 2005St24 compilation and based on data of 1972Ku10. 
MOME2 From 1982Cl03 (inel. scatt.) 
BE4 From Coul. ex. Other: 0.221 {I10}, from 1976Co08, (e,e'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J From |g to 4+ level and band structure. Coulomb-excited. 
T Weighted average of 23.3 ps {I7} (1972Di06) and 22.1 ps {I7} (average of two values in 1980Jo08) from Coul. ex. 
MOMM1 From 1989Ra17 evaluation and 2005St24 compilation and based on data of 1972Ku10. 
BE6 From 1977HoZF, (e,e'), reported as a preliminary result. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J From |g to 6+ level and band structure. Coulomb-excited. 
T Weighted average of 6.2 ps {I6} (1972Di06), 6.0 ps {I4} (1977Ke06), and 5.8 ps {I4} (1980Jo08) from Coul. ex. 
MOMM1 From graph in 1982An10. Other: see J-dependent expression given in 1989Ra17 evaluation which is based on data of 1982An10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J E1 excitation in (|g,|g') 
T From weighted average of 20.1 fs {I14}, by DSAM in (n,n'|g) (1993Ju04) and 24 fs {I3}, (|g,|g'). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$L=0 in (t,p). 
T$Weighted average of 0.90 ps {I21} (1999Kr10, DSAM) and 0.94 ps {I18} (2012Mo23, measured B(E2)(W.u.)=11.2 {I21}), both from Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$From |g's to 0+ and 4+ states. E2 excitation in Coul. ex. 
T$weighted average of 4.23 ps {I49}, 4.25 ps {I54} and 4.35 ps {I55} (from Coul. ex. respective B(E2)(W.u.)|_ values measured by 2012Mo23 for the |g rays from this level: 1.32 {I15}, 0.72 {I9}, 0.32 {I4}). Other values: from Coul. ex. (1999Kr10): >2.4 ps (DSAM); 1.4 ps {I3} (from B(E2)=0.023 {I5}, but 1999Kr10 argue that this value is too small). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J From multiple Coulomb excitation and band structure. 
T Weighted average of 2.52 ps {I16} (1977Ke06) and 2.37 ps {I18} (1980Jo08), measured following Coulomb excitation. 
MOMM1 From graph in 1982An10. Other: see J-dependent expression given in 1989Ra17 evaluation, which is based on data of 1982An10. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 5.6 ps {I18}, 5.8 ps {I18} and 5.6 ps {I19} (from Coul. ex. respective B(E2)(W.u.)|_ values measured by 2012Mo23 for the |g rays from this level: 0.66 {I21}, 0.57 {I18}, 0.32 ps {I11}) 
J From |g's to 2+ and 6+ states. Populated in Coul. ex. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 0+ and 4+ states. E2 excitation in Coul. ex. 
T$Coul. ex. weighted average of 0.42 ps {I3} (1999Kr10, DSAM) and 0.42 ps {I4} (2012Mo23, B(E2)(W.u.)|_). The latter value is the weighted average of 0.42 ps {I7}, 0.42 ps {I4} and 0.42 ps {I5} (calculated from the respective B(E2)(W.u.)|_ values measured by 2012Mo23 for the |g rays from this level: 0.36 {I5}, 3.2 {I3}, 1.9 ps {I2}). From Coul. ex.; other: 0.28 ps {I4}, computed from B(E2)=0.069 {I10} (1999Kr10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$|g's to 0+ and 2+ levels; angular distribution in inelastic scattering. Assigned as the bandhead of the K{+|p}=1- octupole band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
J From |g's to 2+ and 4+ states, angular distribution in inelastic scattering, and expected band structure. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_comment:
J$E1 transitions to 0+ and 2+ levels in (n,n'|g). Excitation via a presumptive E1 transition in (|g,|g'). See the comment in that data set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$Fed by primary |g from 1- state populated via n-capture |g rays; |g's to 2+ and 4+ levels. E1 |g from 3- indicates |p=+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2+
level_comment:
J From |g's to 0+ and 3- levels. Proposed to be excited via M1 in (|g,|g'), indicating J|p=1+, but this leads to a violation of RUL for the 961.3 |g (which would then be M2) deexciting this level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (6+)
level_comment:
J$From |g's to 4+ and 6+ levels. Assigned as the 6+ member of the |g-vibrational band by 1992Mo20 (Coul. ex.). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+,2- and 4+ levels indicate J{+|p}=2+,3. E1 |g's to positive-parity states indicate |p=-, and hence J=3. (See the comment on the decay modes of this level in the (n,n'|g) data set). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4+)
level_comment:
E$Proposed as a member (head?) of a band by 1992Mo20 in Coul. ex., but this level is not confirmed by 2006De19 (n,n'|g). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
J From |g(|q) and linear polarization measurements, the |g connecting this level and the ground state is E1 (1976Me17). 
T Calculated from the level width of 19.0 meV {I25}. This value was obtained from |G|g{-0}{+2}/|G=3.1 meV {I4} (measured, 1976Me17, relative to |G|g{-0}{+2}/|G=3.18 meV {I28} for the 963, 1- level in {+152}Sm) and the adopted |g branching. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1-,2+
level_comment:
J$1993Zi05 give J|p=1+, from the reported excitation of this level via M1 radiation. However, this would require M2 for the 961.3 |g to the 3- level at 1012. [This |g is not reported by 1993Zi05, but it is seen in the {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73 m).] From the reported |G|g{-0} and the relative |g intensities, this M2 transition would have a transition probability |? 2000 times greater than that allowed by RUL. For the J|p=1- assignment, the 961.3 |g (now E2) would have B(E2)(W.u.)=23. For a 2+ assignment, B(E2)(W.u.)=3.7 for the |g deexciting this level to the ground state and, thus, B(E2)(W.u.)=18 for its excitation from the ground state. In the first instance (J|p=1-), the implied B(E2)(W.u.) for the 961.3 |g is large, but perhaps not impossibly so. In the second case (J|p=2+), the implied B(E2)(W.u.) for excitation is of such a magnitude that the state probably should have been seen in Coulomb excitation. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 1-
level_lifetime_unit: FS
level_comment:
E Level reported by 1977Be05. 
J E1 excitation in (|g,|g') (1977Be05) 
T Calculated from |G=0.105 eV {I50} (1977Be05). 
|G|g{-0} reported by 1977Be05. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_comment:
J$2006De19 report J{+|p}=2+,3-. However, this level is fed in {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min) by an E1 transition from a 3- level, ruling out |p=-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$Assumed by the evaluator to be the same as the 1986.72 level seen in the {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min). Previous objections to this were based on the differences in the |g-decay modes of this level as observed I|b the |b{+-} decay and in the earlier (n,n'|g) work. the present |g decay mode is that reported by 2006De19, which differs markedly from this earlier (n,n'|g) work and is not inconsistent with the |b{+-} decay results. 
J$2006De19 report J{+|p}=(2+,3). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1-,2+)
level_comment:
E$This level may be the same as the 2015.37 level seen in the {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73~min), based primarily on the reasonable agreement of the decay modes. However, an 837.4 |g is seen in the |b{+-} decay, which 2006De19 should have seen, but do not list. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
E$Assumed by the evaluator to be the same as the 2069.06 level seen in the {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73~min), based primarily on the reasonable agreement of the decay modes. However, a 969.79 |g is seen in the |b{+-} decay, which 2006De19 should have seen, but do not list. 1986Be52 show a 969.7 |g, but give only an upper limit for its I|g value. 
J$1986Be52 report J{+|p}=1-, but give no basis for this assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2+)
level_comment:
$In {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73~min), a 953.97 |g is shown deexciting a 2131.81 level. The two most intense |g's deexciting this level have E|g=953.97 and 1032.55, with I|g(953|g)/I|g(1032|g)|?1.45. 2006De19 do report a 953.34 |g, with I|g=5.9~{I3}, in their data, but show it as unplaced. IT is possible that at least some of this intensity is associated with the decay of this level, but the evaluator has chosen not to do this. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1,2+)
level_comment:
E Because of the somewhat different relative I|g values for the |g's depopulating this level compared with those from the 2139.80 level in the {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (1.73 min), this level may not the same as that level. The properties listed for this level in the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set are from the |b{+-} decay data. 
J$From the Adopted Values. 1986Be52 report J{+|p}=1-, but give no basis for that assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_comment:
E$This may be the same as the 2232.8 level seen in the {+154}Pm |b{+-} decay (2.68~min). There, a strong 526.0 |g is reported to also deexcite this level. 2006De19 report a 525.6~{I3} |g, but place IT elsewhere in the level scheme. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 3.03 ns {I5} (1967Wo06) and 3.00 ns {I6} (1968Ri09). Other: 2.74 ns {I24} (1959Bi10). 
BE2 Weighted average of 4.30 {I3} (1972Sa42), 4.26 {I6} (1973Be40), 4.39 {I9} (1974Br31), 4.37 {I6} (average of two values in 1974Sh12), 4.266 {I41} (average of three values in in 1974Wo01), 4.40 {I9} (1976Co08), 4.490 {I63} (1977Fi01, but with the uncertainty increased by a factor of 3), and 4.34 {I6} (average of two values in 1979Po04). For a weighted average of the published values, the reduced |h{+2}=6.6 and the value of 1977Fi01 is 5|s high; therefore, the uncertainty of this value was increased. With the uncertainty assigned by the evaluator, the reduced |h{+2}=1.80. Several of these values were derived from reported E2 matrix elements. 
BE2 Other B(E2) values: 4.61 {I20} (1960El07), 4.1 {I4} (1961Go09), 4.38 {I30} and 4.53 {I35} (1963Gr04), 5.1 {I4} (1964Ho25), 4.2 {I6} (1968Ve01), 4.268 {I33} (1973GrXL, see 1974Sh12), 4.26 {I6} (1975Le22, same value as in 1973Be40), 4.45 {I39} (1977HoZF, preliminary result), 4.24 {I12} (1979Ki14). 
MOMM1 From 1989Ra17 evaluation and 2005St24 compilation and based on data of 1969Wh04. Others: +0.53 {I12} (1958Go72, as revised in 1976Fu06), 0.58 {I6} (1967Wo06, as revised in 1978LeZA), 0.37 {I8} (1968Be42), 0.63 {I5} (1970Be36), and 0.76 {I8} (1974Ar23). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 173 ps {I5} (1972Di06) and 169 ps {I10} (1980Jo08). 
BE2$B(E2,2+|)4+)|^=2.5 {I4}; weighted average of 2.32 {I46} (1964Al25) and 2.7 {I6} (1968Ve01). This value corresponds to a lifetime of 149 ps {I24} for the 4+ level, which compares well to the directly measured value of 172 ps {I4}. 
BE4 Computed from the square of the E4 matrix element 0.552 {I16}, which is the weighted average of +0.67 {I8} (1971St24), 0.43 {I8} (1972Sa42), +0.58 {I14} (1973Be40), +0.50 {I+9-12} (1973Eb01), 0.54 {I12} (1974Br31), 0.56 {I7} (average of two values in 1974Sh12), 0.53 {I9} (average of three values in 1974Wo01), 0.63 {I5} (1977Fi01), 0.54 {I2} (1979Ki14). Others: 0.65 {I5} (1973GrXL, see 1974Sh12); 0.58 {I14} (1975Le22, see 1973Be40); and B(E4)=0.221 {I10} (1976Co08, from inelastic electron scattering). 
MOMM1 From 1972Ku10, given as g=0.337 {I36}. Value is also given in the evaluation of 1989Ra17 and the evaluation of 2005St24. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 23.3 ps {I7} (1972Di06) and 22.7 ps {I6} (average of two values in 1980Jo08). Other: 23.8 ps (2001KuZU, preliminary result). 
MOMM1 From 1972Ku10, given as g=0.317 {I46}. Value is also given in the evaluation of 1989Ra17 and the compilation of 2005St24. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 8+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 6.2 ps {I6} (1972Di06), 6.0 ps {I4} (1977Ke06), and 5.8 ps {I4} (1980Jo08). Other: 6.8 ps (2001KuZU, preliminary result). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_comment:
E$value shown on the level scheme of 1992Mo20 
BE3$Weighted average of 0.11~{I3} (1968Ke04) and 0.09~{I2} (1968Ve01). Other: 1966Se06. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_lifetime_info: ;ERR=GT
level_comment:
T From 1999Kr10. Other: 1.4 ps {I3} computed from B(E2) value, but 1999Kr10 argue that this value is not correct. 
BE2 Weighted average of 0.030 {I7} (1965Yo04) and 0.020 {I5} (1968Ve01). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 10+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T Weighted average of 2.52 ps {I16} (1977Ke06) and 2.37 ps {I18} (1980Jo08). Other: 2.45 ps (2001KuZU, preliminary result). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: 2+
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T From 1999Kr10. Other: 0.28 ps {I4} computed from B(E2) value. 
BE2 From 1968Ve01; note conflict with T{-1/2} measurement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J atomic beam (1968Ea02). log| {Ift}=5.5 to 5/2- level in {+155}Eu indicates |p=-. Configuration=(|n 3/2[521]). 
T $weighted average of: 22.180 min {26} (2010GeZX), 22.4 min {I3} (1969Un01); 21.9 min {I2} (1960Su03); 23.5 min {I4} (1952Ru10). Others: 25 min {I2} (1950Wi07); 21 min {I2} (1942Ku03) 
MOME2$from 2016St14 compilation by atomic beam magnetic resonance method 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J E1 transition to g.s., together with intensity of primary feeding transitions in resonance-averaged neutron capture, indicates J|p=5/2+. Assigned as the 5/2[642] Nilsson state. 
T$from decay curve of 16.5|g in {+239}Pu(n,F|g):isomer (2010Si03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture data indicate J|p=5/2-. 53 |g to 3/2- g.s. has an M1 component. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J M1+E2 transition to 5/2- member of g.s. band. Resonance-averaged neutron-capture results indicate J|>7/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J M1 transition to 7/2+ state. Resonance-averaged neutron-capture data indicate J|>7/2. Level energy near that expected for the 9/2+ member of the 5/2+[642] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J M1 transition to 7/2- state. Resonance-averaged neutron-capture data indicate J|>7/2. Level energy (and |p) consistent with assignment as the 9/2- member of the g.s. band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J |g's to 7/2+ and 9/2+ members of the 5/2[642] band. Level energy agrees with that expected for the 11/2+ member of that band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_comment:
J |g's to 9/2+ and 9/2- states. Level energy agrees with that expected for the 11/2- member of the g.s. band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 13/2+
level_comment:
J |g's to 9/2+ and 11/2+ members of the 5/2[642] band. Level energy agrees with that expected for the 13/2+ member of that band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture data indicate J|>7/2. L=2,3 in (d,p) limits J|p possibilities to 7/2-. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$|>11/2 from levels scheme arguments; (11/2-) based on QPRM calculations in {+239}Pu(n,F|g):isomer (2010Si03) 
T$from summed decay curve of 385.6+287.5+76.5+60.0 |g rays +K|a+K|b x rays in the delayed cascade from the 538.6 keV isomer in {+239}Pu(n,F|g):isomer (2010Si03) 
E$dominant configuration=11/2[505] from {+239}Pu(n,F|g):isomer (2010Si03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (9/2-)
level_comment:
J not seen in (n,|g), suggesting J>7/2. Transitions to 9/2+ and (11/2+) states. Level energy agrees with that expected for the 9/2- member of the K|p=5/2- band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron capture indicates J|p=1/2+,3/2+. E1 transition to 5/2- level eliminates 1/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture results indicate J|p=5/2+. M1 transition to 7/2+ level supports |p=+ assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged n-capture data indicate J|>7/2. |g's to 9/2+, 7/2+ and 5/2- states, together with its level energy, support the assignment of this level as the 7/2+ member of this K|p=3/2+ band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged n capture gives J|p=1/2-, 3/2-. E1 transition to 5/2+ state rules out J=1/2. log| {Ift}=5.4 from {+155}Pm g.s. indicates that both levels involved have the same asymptotic quantum numbers, [532] in this case. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2-
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged capture data and L=1 in (d,p) indicate J|p=1/2- or 3/2-. Large (d,p) cross section establishes this level as the bandhead of the 1/2[521] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
J from resonance-averaged neutron capture, J|p=5/2- or J|>7/2. |g's to the 5/2+ and 7/2+, but not the 9/2+, members of the 5/2[642] band lend support to the 5/2- assignment. |b{+-} feeding pattern of this level and the 778 and 919 levels in {+155}Sm |b{+-} decay support the interpretation of them as members of the 3/2[532] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged capture data allow J|p=1/2, 3/2-. M1 transition to 5/2- state rules out J=1/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
E 1982Sc03 identify the 874 level in (d,p) as being this state. However, this (d,p) level may also contribute to the 882.2 state seen in (n,|g). 
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture results indicate J|p= 1/2+,3/2+. Transition to 5/2- state rules out 1/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)+
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture results indicate J|p=1/2+ or 3/2+. Existence of another 1/2+,3/2+ level at 968 keV and only one 5/2+ level (at 1011 keV), together with the "completeness" aspect of the resonance-averaged neutron-capture reaction, suggest that these levels form a K|p=1/2+ band. The large (d,p) peak observed in this energy region would then indicate a significant component of 1/2[400] (J=1/2) in this state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_comment:
E although most of the 909 peak in (d,p) is likely to be associated with the 903 level, because of its closeness in energy some part of this peak may be due to the population of this 906 state 
J from population pattern in resonance-averaged n capture 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2)-
level_comment:
E although most of the 909 peak in (d,p) is likely to be associated with the 903 level, because of its closeness in energy some part of this peak may be due to the population of this 915 state 
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture results indicate J|p=1/2-,3/2-. Probable assignment as head of 1/2[530] band favors J=1/2. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
J feeding in |b{+-} decay from J|p=5/2- indicates |p=- and J=3/2, 5/2 or 7/2. Nonobservation of this level in (n,|g) rules out 3/2 and makes 5/2 unlikely. Interpretation of this level as the 7/2- member of the 3/2[532] band clarifies the |b{+-} feeding pattern in {+155}Pm |b{+-} decay (i.e., its members are populated by the three strongest |b{+-} transitions in this region of excitation). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2-
level_comment:
J J|p=1/2-,3/2- from resonance-averaged neutron capture. M1 component in transition to 5/2- rules out 1/2-. 1975Ja19 assign this level as the 5/2- member of the 1/2-[521] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2-
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged n capture indicates J|p=5/2- or J|>7/2. Level energy agrees with expected position of 7/2- member of this band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2)+
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron capture indicates J|p=1/2+,3/2+. Band-structure considerations (see comment on 903.466 level) favor the 3/2+ assignment. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5/2-)
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
J from resonance-averaged n capture, J|p=5/2- or J|>7/2. |g's to 3/2+ and 7/2- states restrict J|p to 5/2- or 7/2+. Probably the 5/2- member of the 1/2[530] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_comment:
J resonance-averaged neutron-capture results indicate J|p=1/2+ or 3/2+. Transition to 5/2- rules out J|p=1/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E$neutron capture resonance energy; listed value represents the neutron binding energy. 
J capture state is formed by s-wave (L=0) neutron capture on a doubly even nucleus (J|p=0+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2)-
level_comment:
Level not reported in other studies of the {+155}Sm level scheme. Assigned as the 7/2- member of the 3/2-[532] band, whose 3/2- and 5/2- members are at 778.6 and 821.3, respectively. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+,3/2+
level_comment:
E given as 1508.2 in 1982Sc03 (their Table 1). This is clearly a misprint. From its position in the table, the evaluator assumes that the misprint involves the second digit in the value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1/2+
level_comment:
E listed value represents the neutron binding energy. 
J capture state is formed by s-wave (L=0) neutron capture on a doubly even nucleus (J|p=0+). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$ from fitting an exponential function to the time spectra of delayed 16.5 keV transition (2010Si03) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
J$|>11/2 from level scheme arguments; (11/2-) based on QPRM calculations (2010Si03) 
T$from fitting an exponential decay function to the time spectra, sum of 385.6+287.5+76.5+60.0 |g rays +K|a+K|b x rays in the delayed cascade from the 538.6 keV isomer (2010Si03) 
E$dominant configuration=11/2[505]. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: H
level_comment:
T$From 1963Gu04, |g(t). Others: 9.1 h~{I7}, |b+|g(t) (1960Al33); 15 h~{I13}, |g(t) (1969WiZX). All values are from {+156}Sm |b{+-} decay. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+ and 4+. Level energy suggests that this is the 3- member of the K{+|p}=1- octupole band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (2-)
level_comment:
J$Sole decay mode is |g to 2+. From level energy, probable 2- member of the K{+|p}=1- octupole band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3-)
level_comment:
J$From |g's to 2+ and 4+, J{+|p}=2+,3,4+. Agreement of the |g branching to the 2+ and 4+ members of the g.s. band with the Alaga-rule predictions for |DK=0 dipole transitions lends support to the assignment of this state as the 3- member of the K{+|p}=0- octupole band. Hence, J{+|p}=3- is reasonable. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_comment:
J$Sole mode of decay is a |g to 4+. From level energy, probably the 4- member of the K{+|p}=1- octupole band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$The |g transitions from this state to the g.s. band have large hindrance factors, indicating a large K value. Examination of the Nilsson orbitals expected to be present among the lowest-lying two-quasiparticle excitations in {+156}Sm indicates two such pairs, each of which has K{+|p}=5-. Since this state is the more weakly fed of the two in |b{+-} decay, the listed two-neutron-quasiparticle conf is assigned as the dominant component in the make-up of this state. 
T$From 1990He11, {+156}Pm |b{+-} decay. 2009Si21, in SF decay, report T{-1/2}=186~ns~{I44}. Other: 1974ClZX report a 160~ns~{I40} activity among the products of {+252}Cf spontaneous fission, but do not definitely associate it with a specific {+156}Sm level. See the comment on this level in the {+252}Cf SF Decay data set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_comment:
E$Even though the levels immediately above and below this one may be associated with the 1516 proton group in (t,p), the evaluator has chosen not to include this level in that possible association because it is expected that only natural-parity states are excited to any appreciable extent in the (t,p) reaction. 
J$The sole decay mode of this state is a |g transition to the K{+|p}=5- bandhead at 1397~keV, suggesting that this state also has a large K value and is most probably the 6- member of the band built on that state. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$In an argument similar to that for the 1397, 5-, state, this state has a large K value, for which K{+|p}=5- is the most likely assignment. See the discussion in the comment on the J{+|p} value of the 1397, 5-, state above, as well as in the {+156}Pm |b{+-} Decay data set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+, (2-), 4+ and (4-) levels indicate J=3. The |p assignment is problematic at present. See the discussion in the {+156}Pm |b{+-} Decay data set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3
level_comment:
J$|g's to 2+, (2-), 4+ and (4+) levels indicate J=3. The |p assignment is problematic at present. See the discussion in the {+156}Pm |b{+-} Decay data set. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$From 2009Si21. (Note that, in their comparison of experimental and theoretical |g-ray branching ratios within the 5- band (their Table IV), 2009Si21 list T{-1/2}=210 ns.) This is probably a misprint. For the results from other studies, see the adopted values. 1974ClZX report the existence of an isomer in {+156}Sm with T{-1/2}=160~ns {I40}, but do not associate it with a specific level. This 1397 level is probably the same as the isomer observed by 1974ClZX. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T From 1990He11. Note that 1974ClZX report a half-life of 160 ns {I40}, but were not able to identify the associated level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4+
level_comment:
$1990He11 propose the two-proton quasiparticle excitation |p5/2[413]+|p3/2[411] as the conf of this state (note that the one shown by them apparently has a misprint), presumably by analogy with the 1510.5, 4+, state in {+156}Gd. However, the location of the Fermi surface for protons in {+156}Sm is different from that in {+156}Gd. The evaluator has proposed a different conf for this state (see the Adopted Levels data set). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (3/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J Assigned as the 3/2[521] state in analogy to the isotone {+159}Gd (1990Ja11). 
T$Weighted average of 480 s {I60} (1973Da05, or 8.0 min {I10}), 480 s {I30} (1973Ka23, or 8.0 min {I5}), 402 s {I24} (1986Ma12), and 483 s {I2} (1988GrZY,1990An31) is 482 s {I4} or 8.03 m {I7}. Others: 0.5 m {I1} (1960Wi10) and 83 s {I2} (1972Mo28) which are both probably misassigned nuclides, 8.11 min {I13} (1980Ba51) which was replaced by 1990An31 value. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_comment:
J$Adopted by 1994WiZZ ({+157}Pm |b{+-} decay dataset) and maintained by 2010Hw03 ({+252}Cf SF decay dataset) based on expected band structure and Nilsson states 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
T From 1990An31 (and 1988GrZY by same authors); others: 5.51 min {I9} (1980Ba51 by same group as 1990An31) and 5.20 min {I20} (1986Ma12). Other: from {+158}Eu grow-in (1975DoZN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$adopted in {+252}Cf SF decay dataset: weighted average of 72 ns {I6} (2014Wa53, quoted by them from their measurement reported in: N.T. Brewer et al in "Fission and Properties of Neutron-rich Nuclei", Sanibel 2012) and 83 ns {I12} (2009Si21); Others: 115 ns (1995Zh15; this value also appears in table V of 2009Si21 which seems a misprint); 1973TaZG report that the 167-keV |g follows an isomeric level with T{-1/2} = 164 ns (presumably the decay from this 5- level was observed) 
J$assigned by 1995Zh15 and 1998Ga12 in {+252}Cf SF decay dataset based on calculations and in analogy with 5- level in {+156}Sm at 1397 keV, and sustained by transitions to (4+) and (6+) 
$ Dominant configuration=|n5/2[642]~#|n5/2[523] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J$associated by 2014Wa53 ({+252}Cf SF decay dataset) with the predicted second (5-)-based band and partially sustained by the transition to (4+) (however the transition to (6+) as in the case of first (5-)-based band was not identified) 
$Dominant configuration=|p5/2[532]~#|p5/2[413] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 72 ns {I6} (2014Wa53, quoted by them from their measurement reported in: N.T. Brewer et al in "Fission and Properties of Neutron-rich Nuclei", Sanibel 2012) and 83 ns {I12} (2009Si21); Others: 115 ns (1995Zh15; this value also appears in table V of 2009Si21 which seems a misprint); 1973TaZG report that the 167-keV |g follows an isomeric level with T{-1/2} = 164 ns (presumably the decay from this 5- level was observed) 
J$assigned by 1995Zh15 and 1998Ga12 based on calculations and in analogy with 5- level in {+156}Sm at 1397 keV, and sustained by transitions to (4+) and (6+) 
$Dominant configuration=|n5/2[642]~#|n5/2[523] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_comment:
J$associated by 2014Wa53 with the predicted second (5-)-based band and partially sustained by the transition to (4+) (however the transition to (6+) as in the case of first (5-)-based band was not identified) 
$Dominant configuration=|p5/2[532]~#|p5/2[413] 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from log| {Ift}=5.0 of the |b{+-} decay to 1051 level in {+159}Eu, which is interpreted as a |n5/2[523] |) |p7/2[523] |b transition, the 'au' |b transition expected in this mass region. |n5/2[523] is found as the ground state in the heavier N=97 isotones (1971Bu16,1990Ja11). 
T$from 1987Gr12 (also 1990An31, weighted average of the half-lives of the Eu x-rays and the |g rays from {+159}Sm decay). Other: 15 s {I2} (1986Ma12). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
E,J$from the expected energy spacing of the 7/2- member of the |n5/2[523], and the predicted energy of 72 keV (2009Ur04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E,J$from |n11/2[505] bandhead assignment in {+252}Cf SF decay (2009Ur04). 2017Pa25 assigned (15/2+) and interpreted this level as a 3-qp state with configuration=|n(5/2[523])~#|p5/2[532]~#|p5/2[413], and predicted level energy of 1040 keV from their Nilsson-BCS calculations. Note, however, that these calculations by 2017Pa25 predicted an energy of 1255 keV for the |n11/2[505] bandhead, close to the experimental energy of 1277 keV. The quasiparticle rotor model calculations by 2009Ur04 predicted the energy of the |n11/2[505] bandhead at 1362 keV. 
T$from 869.7|g(t) in {+252}Cf SF decay (2009Ur04); note that authors quote 116 ns {I8} in the abstract, but 115 ns {I10} in level-scheme Fig. 5 and in the text. Other: 50 ns {I17} in {+159}Sm IT decay (2017Pa25). Value from 2009Ur04 is preferred due to higher statistics in this experiment, as shown in authors' Fig. 4, as compared to that in 2017Pa25, as shown in authors' Fig. 7. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from fitting the time spectrum for 869.7|g (2009Ur04); note that authors quote 116 ns {I8} in the abstract, but 115 ns {I10} in level-scheme Fig. 5 and in the text. 
$Proposed configuration=|n11/2[505] extruder orbital (2009Ur04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_comment:
$Level, deexciting by a 71.8|g, proposed by 2001AsZY, based on predicted energy of 70 keV for the 7/2- member of |n5/2[523] band. Note that in the follow-up primary article by 2005Ic02 by the same group as 2001AsZY, this level was not reported. This level has not been seen in {+159}Sm IT decay (2017Pa25), and in {+252}Cf SF decay (2009Ur04 and 2008Hw03), perhaps, due to weak population of unfavored signature partner of the |n5/2[523] band. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$from the Adopted Levels, based on |n11/2[505] assignment by 2009Ur04. 2017Pa25 assiged (15/2+) and proposed a 3-qp state configuration=|n(5/2[523])~#|p5/2[532]~#|p5/2[413]. 
T$from the Adopted Levels, from measurement by 2009Ur04 with a higher statistics than in 2017Pa25. 2017Pa25 measured T{-1/2}=50 ns {I17} from a weighted average of values from 163|g(t) and 243|g(t). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$9.6 s {I3} (1987Gr12, also quoted in 1988GrZY), 8.7 s {I14} (1986Ma12), 10.1 s {11} (2017Wu04). Weighted average of the three values is 9.6 s {I3} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$from 2009Si21 in {+252}Cf SF decay (by observing the intensity ratio of 1128|g/162|g and 878|g/250|g) 
$Two-quasiparticle configuration=|p5/2{+-}[532]~#|p5/2{++}[413]; according to blocked-BCS calculations (2016Pa01) this configuration is preferred instead of |n5/2[642]~#|n5/2[523] (2009Si21, {+252}Cf SF decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
T$from 2009Si21 (by observing the intensity ratio of 1128|g/162|g and 878|g/250|g) 
$ Dominant configuration=|n5/2{++}[642]~#|n5/2{+-}[523] (2009Si21); for adopted configuration see Adopted Levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$from Adopted Levels (measured by 2009Si21 in {+252}Cf SF decay datastet) 
$Two-quasiparticle configuration=|p5/2{+-}[532]~#|p5/2{++}[413]; according to blocked-BCS calculations (2016Pa01) this configuration is preferred instead of |n5/2[642]~#|n5/2[523] (2009Si21, {+252}Cf SF decay) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J From systematics, 2003Au02 list J|p=7/2+. 
T Weighted average (by the evaluator) of the values 5.0 s {i6} (x(t)), 4.8 s {i10} (|g(t)), and 4.4 s {i8} (|g(t)), all from 1998Ic02. These authors report T{-1/2}=4.8 s 8. 
2003ShZU, with many of the same authors as 1998Ic02, report T{-1/2}=4.3 s, with no uncertainty given. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the compiler). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|n7/2[633] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the compiler). The assignment is tentative. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected. The |b{+-}n decay is forbidden as Q(|b{+-}n)=-1250 keV {I7} (2021Wa16: AME2020) 
$T{-1/2}=4349 ms {I+425-441}, %|b{+-}n|<2.7 listed in 2022Ki23. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Assumed by the evaluator 
T$weighted average of 2.4 s {I5} (2005Ic02, 2001AsZY), 3.0 s {I5} (2017Wu04) and 3.37 s {I+20-30} (2022Ki23) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (4-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Proposed configuration=|n7/2[633]~#|n1/2[521], K|p=4- from comparison with deformed Hartree-Fock with angular momentum projection model, and projection shell model (2017Yo01; same configuration proposed by 2017Pa25) 
T$From 2017Yo01 from likelihood fitting of time spectrum between the {+162}Sm beam implantation and subsequent summed 71|g+165|g+775|g-ray spectrum. Other value: 1.7 |ms {I2} from 2017Pa25, weighted average from 165|g(t) and 775|g(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
J$From systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed configuration (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and ground-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 
CONF$|n1/2[521] Nilsson orbital, based on systematics of known structures in neighboring, well-deformed nuclei (by the evaluator). The assignment is tentative. 
$ Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=134 nb {I11} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by possible |b{+-}-delayed neutrond decay, although, Q(|b{+-}n)=52 keV {I7} (2021Wa16: AME2020) is very low for |b{+-}n emission 
$T{-1/2}=1744 ms {I+180-204} listed in 2022Ki23. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=2.2 s, %|b{+-}n=0 (2003Mo09) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=1.15 s, %|b{+-}n=0.3 (2016Ma12) 
T$from 2017Wu04, from a fit to the (implanted ions)|b{+-}-t decay curve using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods, including contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, and a constant background. 
$Production |s(at 1 GeV/nucleon)=42 nb {I4} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Configuration: K|p=6-, |n5/2[512]~#|n7/2[633]. Calculations suggest |b{-2}=0.295, |b{-4}=0.029, |b{-6}=-0.020 (2014Pa55) 
T$from decay curves obtained from (ion implantation)(|g)(t) correlations for 155-, 242-, 349-, 669-, and 911-keV |g rays 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
$Configuration=|n5/2[512]~#|n7/2[633], |b{-2}=0.295, |b{-4}=0.029, |b{-6}=-0.020 
T$from decay curves obtained from (ion implantation)(|g)(t) correlations for 155-, 242-, 349-, 669-, and 911-keV |g rays 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by possible |b{+-}-delayed neutrond decay 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=0.626 s, %|b{+-}n=0.0 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=0.785 s, %|b{+-}n=0.761 and 0.497 for different fission barriers (2021Mi17) 
E$it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity of {+165}Sm 
J$(5/2-) from systematics of known quasiparticle states in neighboring nuclei and the proposed tentative configuration=|n5/2[512] (evaluators) 
T$from 2017Wu04, fit to the (implanted ion)|b{+-}-correlated decay curve using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods, by including contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, assuming a constant background. 
$Production |s (at 1 GeV/nucleon)=7.8 nb {I16} (2012Ku26) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
%B-$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected. 
T$From 2017Wu04, using a fit to the implanted ion-|b{+-}-t spectrum using the least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. The data analysis included contributions from the parent, daughter and grand-daughter decays, as well as a constant background. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=571 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.6 (2003Mo09: Phys. Rev. C67, 055802) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=526 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.4 (2016Ma12: Phys. Rev. C93, 025805) 
$A total of 84 counts were assigned to {+166}Sm for spectrometer setting on Pr, and 64 counts for setting on Gd. 
$Production |s=0.15 nb {I3} for Pr setting and 0.10 nb {I1} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
T$from 2017Wu04 (at RIBF-RIKEN) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by |b{+-}-delayed neutrond decay 
$%|b{+-}n=4.38 {I+125-138} listed in 2022Ki23. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (7/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
$ Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, and has been observed, followed by delayed-neutron decay 
$ Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b decay)=0.1187 s, %|b{+-}n=1.0 (2019Mo01) 
$ Theoretical T{-1/2}(|b decay)=366.8 ms, %|b{+-}n=1.945, 2.775 (2021Mi17, two values for different fission barriers). 
$ A total of three counts were assigned to {+167}Sm for spectrometer setting on Pr, and nine counts for setting on Gd (2018Fu08). 
$ Production |s=5.4 pb {I+124-45} for Pr setting, and 14 pb {I+6-5} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s values (2018Fu08) 
E$ it is assumed that the observed events correspond to ground-state activity. 
J$ tentative 7/2-, analogous to 7/2-, |n7/2[514] ground states in N=105 isotones {+177}Hf and {+179}W, and a low-lying level in {+181}Pt. 7/2- in 2019Mo01 (theory), and from systematics (2021Ko07). 
T$ from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$ %|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
$Only |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by delayed-neutron decay, thus 100% |b{+-} decay is assigned by inference. 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=256.7 ms, %|b{+-}n=3 (2019Mo01) 
$Theoretical T{-1/2}=256.5 ms, %|b{+-}n=0.8 (2016Ma12) 
$Only one possible count was assigned to {+168}Sm for spectrometer setting on Gd, and none for setting on Pr, making the identification of this isotope uncertain 
$Production |s=1.5 pb {I+35-12} for Gd setting, with 50% systematic uncertainty on |s value (2018Fu08) 
T$lower limit from time-of-flight of 550 ns given in 2018Fu08. Actual half-life is expected to be much longer as suggested by the theoretical values of 256.7 ms (2019Mo01) and 256.5 ms (2016Ma12). From a general decreasing trend of half-lives with increasing neutron number, T{-1/2} for {+168}Sm is expected to be <1 s, based on measured half-lives of 1.43 s for {+164}Sm, 0.98 s for {+165}Sm, and 0.80 s {I63} for {+166}Sm, available in literature. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 0+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$Only the |b{+-} decay mode is expected, followed by |b{+-}-delayed neutrond decay 
$T{-1/2}=353 ms {I+210-164} listed in 2022Ki23. 
T$from binned maximum likelihood fitting of the (implant)|b correlated decay curve, using Bateman equations to account for the activities of the parent, daughter, grand-daughter, and great-grand-daughter, and the |b{+-}-delayed neutron branch of the decay chain (2022Ki23) 
$%|b{+-}n deduced from neutron-gated |b{+-}-decay events, fitted by an exponential function of the background subtracted time distribution of (implants)(|b{+-})(neutron)-correlations (2022Ki23). For further details of the analysis method, consult 2020ToZY (Thesis, Univ. of Valencia (2020)). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (1+)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
E$ it is assumed that the observed activity corresponds to the g.s. 
T$ from timing of proton spectra (2004Da04). Earlier value from the same group: 0.90 ms {I+61-26} (2002Ma61) 
$ %p |? 100 from half-life measured by 2004Da04 and calculated |b decay half-life of 49 ms (1997Mo25) 
$ Measured proton energy=1020 {I15} (2004Da04) 
$ Measured production cross section |? 9 nb (large uncertainty) 
J$ Proposed configuration=|p3/2[411]~#|n1/2[411], K|p=1+,2+ with preference for K|p=1+ from Gallagher-Moszkowski rules. It should be noted that the measured half-life agrees better for K=2 in model calculations. This configuration is based on following considerations: the assumption of spherical shape and WKB calculations predict half-life of 30 |ms for d{-5/2} and 6 ms for g{-7/2} proton emission, both in disagreement with the measured half-life. In analogy with the deformed shape found for {+131}Eu through features of its proton decay, {+130}Eu is also assumed to have a deformation with |b{-2} |? 0.3. Assuming the proton configuration of 3/2[411] (as for {+131}Eu), calculations were done by 2004Da04 with the considerations of neutron in 1/2[411] or 7/2[523] orbital. Best agreement with the measured half-life was found for K|p=2+,1+; other possible choices of K|p=2- and 5- for 7/2[523] neutron orbital were in disagreement. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_comment:
T$from 1999So17 
J$from 1999So17. It was shown that a proton configuration=[411]3/2+ accounts for the measured T{-1/2} and proton branching ratio of 0.24 {I5} to the {+130}Sm 2+ level 
$%p calculated by evaluators from T{-1/2}=17.8 ms {I19} assuming that partial |e+|b{++} T{-1/2}=147.4 ms (1997Mo25); |D%p=0.13 in 2002So02 is incorrect as |DT{-1/2}(p)/T{-1/2}(p)=11% 
$Proton decay to {+130}Sm g.s. (E=0, J|p=0{++}): E(p)= 932 {I7} (1999So17) and 950 {I8} (1998Da03), B(p)=0.68 {I11}, J|p(p)=3/2+, T{-1/2}=26.6 ms {I37} (1999So17) and 32 ms {I9} (1998Da03) 
$Proton decay to {+130}Sm (E=121 {I3}, J|p=2{++}): E(p)=811 {I7}, B(p)=0.21 {I5}, T{-1/2}=84 ms {I20} (1999S017) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$S(p)=60 {I280} (syst,2012Wa38) does not exclude proton emission 
J$11/2- proposed from systematics (2012Au07), 5/2+ from calculations (1997Mo25) 
T$from timing of Sm x rays (1989Vi04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
T$from 431.7|g(t) (1989Vi04) 
%B+P$from 1989Vi04 who were not able to assign the branch to a particular |b-decaying level. 
J$tentative assignment based on observed feeding to 6+ and 8+ levels in {+136}Sm 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (3+)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M2
level_comment:
T$average of T{-1/2}=3.7 s {I3} (1989Vi04) and T{-1/2}=3.9 s {I5} (1987Ke05). Both groups used the 2+ to g.s. transition (255 keV) in {+136}Sm to extract T{-1/2}, and thus the value likely has a contribution from the high-spin isomer. 
J$tentative assignment based on observed feeding to 2+ and 4+ levels in {+136}Sm 
%B+P$from 1989Vi04 who were not able to assign the branch to a particular |b-decaying level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T from 1982No15 (observed K| x ray); 1983AlZO reported the following |g rays: 421, 484, 531 with T{-1/2}=9 s. 1986Re11, however, did not observe these |g rays. Other value: T{-1/2}=8.4 s {I5}, from the decay rate of 209.5- and 433-keV |g rays (2001BeZY). 
J$from similarity with {+139}Eu (1987Go35) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (6-)
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J$from comparison of measured |m with theoretical predictions for all possible configurations, among which only the ((|p 5/2-[532])(|n 7/2+[404])) with J|p=6- gives a |m=4.3 in close agreement with the measured |m=5.3 {I7} (1992Si22); J|p=6- is also supported by direct feeding to high-spin (J|>6) states in {+138}Sm from {+138}Eu |e decay. 
T$from |g(t) in 1985Ch25 (also 1986Re11 and 1987Pl05). Others: 12 s {I2} (1982No15, X-ray(t)), 12 s {I1} (1987Ke05, |g(t)). 1977Bo02 report two half-lives of 35 s {I6} and 1.5 s {I4} from the non-selective measurements of total |b decay of the isobaric chain and assign them to the {+138}Eu decay, which is incorrect according to their later report (1982No15) of half-life measurements using X rays. 
MOMM1$from temperature-dependent curve of |g-ray anisotropy using the 686|g in {+138}Sm from {+138}Eu decay (1992Si22). See also 2014StZZ compilation. 
$root-mean-square deformation parameter <|b{+2}>{+1/2}=0.246 {I8} (2004Ba93) 
$Evaluated nuclear charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.978 fm {I10} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: (1-)
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J$configuration=(|p 5/2-[532])(|n 7/2+[404]) would give 6- and 1- states. Since 6- is assigned to the g.s., it is possible that this state has J|p=1-; it is also supported by the direct feeding from {+138}Gd g.s. |e decay, J|p(g.s.)=0+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
J$from 2001He15 in {+106}Cd({+35}Cl,2pn|g) based on systematics of neighbouring N=75 isotones for band-head spin (2001St04, 1998Li36, 1996Li13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (9+)
level_comment:
J$from 2001He15 based on systematics of neighbouring N=75 isotones for band-head spin (2001St04, 1998Li36, 1996Li13) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: (11/2)-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
$ RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.9760 fm {I93} (2013An02 evaluation) 
J$allowed |e decay to 11/2- 
T$from 1986De35. Others: 24 s {I5} (1986Re11) and 22 s {I3} (1973WeZK, Gd(p,xpxn), E(p)=600 MeV. ISOLDE; |b{++}(t), x(t)). See {+139}Eu |e decay for details. 
MOMM1$nuclear orientation with |g detected (1992Si22) 
$ 1987Al25 measured hyperfine structure 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 15/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$36 ps {I2} if side feeding and cascade feeding times are comparable, 37 ps {I2} if side feeding time is <100 fs, with recommended value of 36.0 ps {I21} (1988Bi03). Other: 36.8 ps {I11} (1985Lu06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 19/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$2.56 ps {I28} if side feeding and cascade feeding times are comparable; 2.84 ps {I35} if side feeding time is <100 fs, with recommended value of 2.77 ps {I35} (1988Bi03). Other: 2.3 ps {I5} (1985Lu06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 23/2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$2.84 ps {I21} with no corrections for feeding; 1.18 ps {I21} or 1.87 {I21} if it is assumed that the 1590 and preceding levels have the same deformation, with recommended value of 1.52 ps {I35} (1988Bi03). Other: 1.6 ps {I4} (1985Lu06) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J log| {Ift}=4.4 to 0+ 
T from 1991Fi03. Others: 1.54 s {I13} (1987De04); 1.3 s {I2} (1973WeZK,1972WeZE) 
$Configuration=|pd{-5/2}~#|nd{-3/2} (2006Ta08) 
MOMM1$By collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy - accelerated beam (1985Ah02) 
MOME2$By collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy - accelerated beam (1985Ah02) 
$RMS charge radius <r{+2}>{+1/2}=4.9695 fm {I91} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
T from 1991Fi03 
E$x=210 {I15} (2012Au07); other value x=210 {I25} (|?50 keV above the 185.3 level, from absence of K| x ray corresponding to an isomeric transition, 1991Fi03) 
J$|g to 2+ is (E3), |g to 3+ is (M2); systematic behavior of 5- and 8+ levels in {+140}Eu, {+142}Tb, and {+144}Ho N=77 isotones with unambiguously measured 5- in {+142}Tb (2006Ta08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (7-)
level_comment:
J$|g to (5-) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to 170.41+x, (6-) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (8+)
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
J$|g's to 422.42+x, (7-) and 361.48+x, (7-) are E1 
T$weighted average of 302 ns {I4} ({+92}Mo({+54}Fe,n5p|g), 2006Ta08) and 299.0 ns {I25} ({+107}Ag({+36}Ar,n2p|g), 2002Cu05) 
$Configuration=|ph{-11/2}~#|nh{-11/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 170.41+x, 6- is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to 361.48+x, (7-) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (8-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 284.82+x, (6-) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to 361.48+x, (7-) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between rotational bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (9-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 361.48+x, (7-) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to 654.80+x, (8-) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (8+) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to (9+) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between rotational bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (9+) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to (10+) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (10-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 762.90+x, (8-) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to 654.80+x, (8-) is E2, |DJ=2 transition (in between rotational bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (12+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (10+) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to (11+) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (13+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (11+) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to (12+) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (12+) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to (13+) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between signature-partner bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (14+)
level_comment:
J$|g to (12+) is E2, in-band |DJ=2 transition; |g to (13+) is M1+E2, |DJ=1 transition (in between rotational bands) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (14-)
level_comment:
J$|g to 2427.7+x, (13-) is supposed to be (M1+E2), |DJ=1 transition, based on band crossing at spin 12 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,J$questionable level because uncertain placement of its daughter |g in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25); 2003He25 assign J|p=17- with no argument 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_uncertain: ?
level_comment:
E,J$questionable level because uncertain placement of its daughter |g in ({+51}V,2pn|g) (2003He25); 2003He25 assign J|p=18- with no argument 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y
level_spin_parity: J
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$y>1615+x, since the |g rays are in coincidence with transitions from 1615+x and 898+x levels 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x=210 {I25}, |?50 keV above 185.3 level; the measured K x rays are from the conversion of 174.6|g and 185.3|g only, which implies that this isomeric state is at less than Eu K binding energy of 48.5 keV above 185.3 level 
J$deduced by 1991Fi03 based on M2 |g to 3+, and E3 |g to 2+; confirmed by 2006Ta08 from isotone systematics, particularly {+142}Tb ({+142}Tb studied by 2006Ta08) 
T$from 1991Fi03 
$Configuration=|ph{-11/2}~#|ns{-1/2}, |ph{-11/2}~#|nd{-3/2} (2006Ta08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 17-
level_comment:
E,J$marked as questionable level with no J|p in Adopted because of uncertain placement of its depopulating |g and no J|p arguments in 2003He25 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 5-
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
E$x=210 {I25} (|?50 keV above the 185.3 level) 
J$Deduced by 1991Fi03 from transition strength (RUL) arguments; confirmed by 2006Ta08 from {+142}Tb isotone 
T$from 1991Fi03 
$Configuration=|ph{-11/2}~#|ns{-1/2}, |ph{-11/2}~#|nd{-3/2} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: (5-)
level_lifetime_unit: MS
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M1
level_comment:
E$the 125-ms isomer is expected to be within 50 keV above the known 185.3 level (1991Fi03), which gives x=210 {I25}. 2012Au07 quote x=210 {I15} 
J$adopted by 2002Cu05 from 1991Fi03 (IT decay dataset); parentheses added by 2002Cu05 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
T$weighted average: 40.0 s {I7} (1977De25), 41.4 s {I7} (1993Al03), see also 1989Gi06. Others: 37 s {I3} (1973WeZK), 28 s {I6} (1973VaYZ) 
J hfs (LASER) (1985Ah02), log| {Ift}=5.2 to 3/2+ 
MOMM1 hfs (LASER) 
MOME2 hfs (LASER) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
J$E3 |g to 5/2+ 
T from 1989Gi06. Others: 3.3 s {I3} (1977De25), 4 s {I+6-2} (1973VaYZ) 
Note that in the older paper (1977De25) with %|e+%|b{++}=67, log| {Ift}(11/2- to 11/2-)=4.1 is significantly lower than expected 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J J=1 hfs (1985Ah02), log| {Ift}|<5.1 to 0+ and 2+. Configuration=((|p d{-5/2}){+-1}(|n d{-3/2}){+-1}) (1996Pi11) 
T$from 1991Fi03. Other: 2.4 s {I2} (1975Ke08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
J J=8 hfs (1985Ah02), log| {Ift}=5.1 to level with |p=-. Configuration=((|p d{-5/2}){+-1}(|n h{-11/2}){+-1}) (1996Pi11) 
T$from 1993Al03. Others: 1.22 min {I2} (1975Ke08), 1.20 min {I15} (1973VaYZ), 1.2 min {I2} (1966Ma15), |?1.1 min (1987FiZW) 
E$x=520 {I50} (1997Au04) based on Q(|e)({+142}Eu 8-)=8150 {I60}, Q(|e)({+142}Eu,1+)=7670 {I30} (1994Po26). Others: Q(|e)({+142}Eu 8-)=8175 {I50} (1983Al06), 7480 {I100} (1993Al03) Q(|e)({+142}Eu,1+)=8000 {I300} (1975Ke08) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 8-
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT 
$Half-life and decay mode from {+142}Eu Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (June 2010 update) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 16-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=1.36 ps {I+22-24} 
$Transition electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.043 efm {I+7-8} 
$Transition electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=3.41 eb {I+55-60} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 17-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=1.18 ps {I+17-18} 
$Transition electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.041 efm {I6} 
$Transition electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=2.92 eb {I+42-45} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 18-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=0.89 ps {I+15-13} 
$Transition electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.055 efm {I+9-8} 
$Transition electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=1.82 eb {I+31-27} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 19-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=1.17 ps {I+25-17} 
$Transition electric dipole moment D{-0}=0.052 efm {I+11-8} 
$Transition electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=0.81 eb {I+17-12} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: 20-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$mean lifetime |t=1.10 ps {I+17-15} 
$Transition electric quadrupole moment Q{-0}=0.62 eb {I+10-9} 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: MIN
level_comment:
J atomic beam (1984Ek01), log| {Ift}=5.3 to 3/2+. 
MOMM1 +3.673 {I8} Collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy - accelerated beam (1985Ah02, 2011StZZ) 
MOME2 +0.51 {I3} Collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy - accelerated beam (1985Th06, 2011StZZ) 
Configuration=(|p d{-5/2}){+-1} 
T$wt av: 2.57 min {i3} (1993Al03), 2.63 min {i5} (1974Ke07) 2.61 min {i3} (1966Ma15), 2.3 min {i2} (1965Ko04) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T from {+143}Gd |e decay (1978Fi02) 
J$|g ray to 5/2+ is E3; |e decay from (11/2-) parent. Configuration=(|ph{-11/2}) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J AP (33/2)
level_comment:
E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment 
E$x=8582 {i4} (1993At01) deduced from possible deexciting transitions to normal bands 
J$from 1999Ax02, who adopt the assignment in 1997Lu03 based on comparison of experimental moments of inertia with those from model calculations. Assignment of (37/2) in 1993At01 was based on deexcitation of SD band. 
$Possible deexcitation to 4656 (33/2) and 4949 (35/2) levels through cascades of two |g rays summing to 3925 {i5} and 3634 {i5}, respectively (1993At01). A single-step transition of 2418.9 {i9} is tentatively assigned (1996At03) to the decay of SD band, but its placement is undetermined. A 2715 transition is also reported in 1999Ax02 in coincidence with transitions in SD-1 band, but its exact placement is not known 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J+2
level_comment:
$Possible deexcitation to 5590 (37/2), 5795 (35/2), 5851 (39/2) and 5872 levels through cascades of two |g rays summing to 3476 {i5}, 3274 {i5}, 3211 {i5} and 3187 {i5}, respectively, was suggested by 1993At01. 1996At03 found, and 1997Le17 confirmed, a 3360.6 transition to deexcite this level and feed a normal level that decays to a level above 4947, 35/2+. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J+4
level_comment:
$Possible deexcitation to 6336 (39/2) level through a cascade of two |g rays summing to 3274 {i5} (1993At01) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X
level_spin_parity: J AP (33/2)
level_comment:
E$x=8582 {i4} (1993At01) deduced from possible deexciting transitions to normal bands 
J$from 1999Ax02, who adopted the assignment in 1997Lu03 based on comparison of experimental moments of inertia with those from model calculations. Assignment of (37/2) by 1993At01 was based on deexcitation of SD band. 
$Possible deexcitation to 4656 (33/2) and 4949 (35/2) levels through cascades of two |g rays summing to 3925 {i5} and 3634 {i5}, respectively (1993At01). A single-step transition of 2418.9 {i9} is tentatively assigned (1996At03) to the decay of SD band, but its placement is uncertain. A 2715 transition is also reported by 1999Ax02 in coincidence with transitions in SD-1 band, but its exact placement is not known 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 1+
level_lifetime_unit: S
level_comment:
J,|m,Q: from 1985Ah02, hfs. |p from allowed decay to 0+ and 2+ levels in {+144}Sm 
|D<r{+2}> ({+145}Eu-{+144}Eu)=-0.050 {I6} (1985Ah02) 
T from 1976Ke01; others: 10.5 s {I3} (1965Me12), 10.1 s (1967Ge13). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=U;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_comment:
Hypothetical level corresponding to a (|ph{-11/2} |nh{-11/2}){+10+} configuration (1996Pi11). The energy u is expected to be small, |?50 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=U;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_comment:
This level was seen by 1981Ha25 and interpreted as having J|p=10+. Based on what is known for neighboring nuclei, 1996Pi11 expect this level to have J|p=11+, and speculate about the existence of a 10+ level at 1669.7+u keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=V;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (14)
level_comment:
$No |g's were observed de-populating this level. Its existence is based on timing data from the plunger. it is assumed to feed the 3454.5 + u level. The energy difference, v-u, is expected to be |<200 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (10+)
level_comment:
Hypothetical level corresponding to a (|ph{-11/2} |nh{-11/2}){+10+} configuration. The energy x is expected to be small, |?50 keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=X;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (11+)
level_comment:
This level was seen by 1981Ha25 and interpreted as having J|p=10+. Based on what is known for neighboring nuclei, 1996Pi11 expect this level to have J|p=11+, and speculate about the existence of a 10+ level at 1669.7+x keV. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_energy_info: ;OFF=Y;ERR=?
level_spin_parity: (14)
level_comment:
$No |g's were observed de-populating this level. Its existance is based on timing data from the plunger. it is assumed to feed the 3454.5 + x level. The energy difference, y-x, is expected to be |<200 keV 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
T from 1980Ho33, 1970Ch09. Others: 5.93 d {I10} (1967Hi05), 5.95 d {I10} 1963Fr02; see also 1963We04, 1965De29, 1967Ob03 
J atomic beam (1976Fu06), L=2 in ({+3}He,d) 
MOMM1 Other: +3.993 {I7} (1989Ra17,1985Ah02), 3.2 {I5} (1985Va21,1983Va02,1983Kr19) 
Q/Q({+153}Eu)=0.1168 {I9} (1993HuZU) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_comment:
J L=4 in ({+3}He,d), M1 |g to 5/2+ 
<r{+2}>=4.980 fm{+2} {I12}, davrq ({+143}Eu,{+145}Eu)=-0.026 {I5}, davrq ({+147}Eu,{+145}Eu)=0.250 {I14}, davrq ({+144}Eu,{+145}Eu)=-0.048 {I6}, davrq ({+146}Eu,{+145}Eu)=0.114 {I7} (2000Ga58) measured isotopic shift 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 4-
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
J$from atomic beam magnetic resonance technique (1972Ek05); parity: decay pattern (1968Pa13), single particle model analysis (1972Ho51). 
MOMM1$weighted average of +1.425 {I11} (1985Ah02) and +1.421 {I8} (1993HuZU) (collinear-laser-ion-beam spectroscopy). Others: +1.3 {I2} (1985Va21), +1.7 {I3} (1983Kr19) 
MOME2$from (collinear-laser-ion-beam spectroscopy) Q/Q({+153}Eu)= -0.0743 {I20} (1993HuZU), Q({+153}Eu)=2.412 {I21} (1984Ta04). Other: -0.18 {I6} (1985Ah02) 
T$weighted average of 4.59 d {I3} (1964Ta11) and 4.65 d {I4} (1970Ch09) Other: 4.95 d (2000La10). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$114.7|g M1+E2 to 4-, 115.5|g M1+E2 from 2-, 576.0|g M1 from 2-. 
T$from |b|g(t) using mirror symmetric centroid (MSCD) analysis (2013Bh07). Others: 0.8 ns {I3} (1970Ko16), <0.160 ns (1972Ho51), <0.3 ns (1976Se02), |?0.23 ns (1958Be72). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
J$log| {If{+1u}t}=8.22 in |e decay g.s., 0+ of {+146}Gd; 230.5|g to 4- 
T$from |b|g(t) using mirror symmetric centroid (MSCD) analysis (2013Bh07). Others: <0.165 ns (1972Ho51), <0.3 ns (1976Se02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
T$weighted average of 230 |ms {I10} (1980LeZN), 235 |ms {I25} (1980Er04), 240 |ms {I10} (1962Re04), 235 |ms {I3} (1971HaXM) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 3-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |b|g(t) using mirror symmetric centroid (MSCD) analysis (2013Bh07). Others: <0.160 ns (1972Ho51), <0.3 ns (1976Se02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 2-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
T$from |b|g(t) using mirror symmetric centroid (MSCD) analysis (2013Bh07). Others: <0.165 ns (1972Ho51), <0.3 ns (1976Se02). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Proposed dominant configuration=|pd{-5/2}{+-1}~#|nf{-7/2} (2022Ze02) 
T$measured mean lifetime |t=3 ps {I+5-3} or |<8 ps (2022Ze02) from (377|g)(275|g)(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 6-
level_lifetime_unit: PS
level_comment:
$Proposed dominant configuration=|pg{-7/2}{+-1}~#|nf{-7/2} (2022Ze02) 
T$measured mean lifetime |t=41 ps {I7} (2022Ze02) from (275|g)(358|g)(t) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7-
level_comment:
$Compiler's note: I|g(275.0|g)/I|g(358.2|g)=62.2 {I83}/30.6 {56} in 2022Ze02 from |g|g-coin data differs by almost a factor of 5 from I|g(275.0|g)/I|g(358.2|g)=32 {I16}/75 {18} in 1988Er02, also from |g|g-coin data, as communicated March 03, 2022 by one of the authors (R. Broda) of 1988Er02. The two ratios are almost reversed. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9+
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_lifetime_info: ;ISO=M
level_comment:
T$from |g(t) (2022Ze02). This value can be compared with 235 |ms {I3} from {+146}Eu Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, same value in 1971HaXM (JINR-E6-6193 preprint). There are four other less precise measurements in literature 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+
level_lifetime_unit: D
level_comment:
$configuration=|pd{-5/2}{+-1} ({+124}Sn({+28}Si,p4n|g)) 
MOMM1,MOME2$measured by collinear fast beam laser spectroscopy - accelerated beam (1985Ah02) Others: 1958An36, 1961Vi05, 1962Jh03, 1962Sc09, 1963Ko09, 1964Mc17, 1965Ad05, 1965Dz09, 1966Av02, 1968Bo47, 1970Va38. 
J$J=5/2 (1972Ek05) atomic beam; |p=+ from d5/2 assignment as for {+145}Eu, {+149}Eu, {+151}Eu (1972Ek05) 
T$from 1971Av09; others: 23.6 d {I10} (1962Sc09), 25 d {I1} (1958An36), 24 d {I2} (1951Ho30) whose unweighted av gives T{-1/2}=24 d {I1}. See also 21.5 d {I5} (1963Fr02) ({+147}Eu+{+147}Gd source, considerably smaller than the others) 
$rms charge radius: 4.9938 fm {I94} (2013An02) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 7/2+
level_lifetime_unit: NS
level_comment:
$configuration=|pg{-7/2}{+-1} ({+124}Sn({+28}Si,p4n|g)) 
T from {+147}Gd |e decay. 
J see 625 level. 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_lifetime_unit: US
level_comment:
MOMM1$measured by time dependent perturbed angular distribution (1980Ba67); also +7.04 {I6} (1980Kl07) 
T from 1970Kl07, {+147}Gd decay 
J$M2 |g to 7/2+, 229, E3 to 5/2+, g.s., M1+E2 from 229 to g.s., uniquely establish J|p(229)=7/2+, J|p(625)=11/2-. This is compatible with h{-11/2} assigned from T{-1/2}=0.765 |ms {i15} by analogy with an isomer in {+145}Eu which occurs at 716 keV (1975Fi02) (T{-1/2}|?0.3 |ms). 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2+
level_comment:
J$5/2+,7/2+,9/2+ from E2 |g to 5/2+, g.s., and M1(+E2) |g to 7/2+, 229; 5/2+ excluded by |g from 9/2-, 1360; 9/2+ more likely (|p=+ states arising from coupling of d{-5/2} and g{-7/2} proton holes to {+148}Gd core are lying close to yrast line, 1985JuZY, {+148}Sm(p,2n|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 5/2+,7/2+
level_comment:
J$5/2+,7/2+ from M1+E2 |g to 5/2+, g.s., M1 |g to 7/2+, 229 level, and M1+E2 |g to (3/2)+, 755 level 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2+
level_comment:
J$3/2+ to 11/2+ from E2 |g to 7/2+, 229; 11/2+ more likely (|p=+ states arising from coupling of d{-5/2} and g{-7/2} proton holes to {+148}Gd core are lying close to yrast line, 1985JuZY, {+148}Sm(p,2n|g)) 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 11/2-
level_comment:
J$9/2-,11/2-,13/2- from M1+E2 |g to 11/2-, 625; 13/2- excluded by M1 |g from 9/2-, 1554; 9/2- unlikely because of non-observance of |e feeding from 7/2- g.s. in {+147}Gd |e decay 


level_energy_unit: KEV
level_spin_parity: 9/2-
level_comment:
J$E1 |g to 7/2+, 229, and (M1) |g to 11/2-; (1131|g)(229|g)(|q) in {+147}Gd |e decay consistent with 9/2, not 7/2. 


