32SI ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI dG $Transition strength is calculated by Java-RULER (version 18-Aug-2022) 32SI dL E$Least-squares fitting is done by GLSC (version 11-Oct-2024) 32SI Q 227.2 3 9200.0 3 16416.0 23-11482.74 2021WA16 32SI cQ $S(2n)=15787.36 {I30}, S(2p)=29774.3 {I13} (2021Wa16) 32SI c Mass measurements: 2009Kw02, 2003Bl17, 2001Pa52, 1997Ro26 32SI c Mass deduced from IMME analysis: 2021Ka45, 2010Ka30, 2006Tr03 32SI c Strong absorption radius measurement: 1999Ai02 32SI c {+32}Si activity standardization measurements: 2023Ko25, 2023Ne09 32SI c Structure calculations: 32SI c 2022Da11,2022Lu03,2020Fo04,2017Ro08,2017Ts01,2015Pu01,2009Bo16: 32SI2c calculated levels, J, |p, B(E2) 32SI c 2021In02,2021Ku13: calculated deformation parameter 32SI d Consult NSR database for other theory references 32SI cG E$Values with uncertainties are from {+32}Al |b{+-} decay and 32SI2cG others from level-energy differences in (t,p|g), unless otherwise 32SI3cG noted 32SI cG RI$From (t,p|g), unless otherwise stated 32SI cG M,MR$From p|g(|q) in (t,p|g) with magnetic/electric nature determined 32SI2cG based on RUL when level half-lives are known, unless otherwise noted 32SI cL E$From E|g data for levels connected with |g transitions and from 32SI2cL (t,p) for others, unless otherwise noted. Where there are no |DE|g, 32SI3cL level energies are taken from (t,p|g) where quoted values of 32SI4cL E(level) are deduced based on measured |g-ray energies which however 32SI5cL are not explicitly listed in the references of (t,p|g). 32SI cL T$From DSAM in (t,p|g) for excited levels, unless otherwise stated. 32SI DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3e (17-Jun-2020) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr. 32SI PN 6 32SI XA32AL B- DECAY (32.3 MS) 32SI XB33AL B-N DECAY (41.5 MS) 32SI XH12C(22NE,2PG) 32SI XC30SI(T,P) 32SI XD30SI(T,PG) 32SI XE31SI(N,G) E=TH 32SI XF208PB(37CL,XG) 32SI XGCOULOMB EXCITATION 32SI L 0.0 0+ 157 Y 7 32SIX L XREF=ABCDEFGH 32SI2 L %B-=100 32SI cL $r{-0}{+2}=1.15 fm{+2} {I7} (1999Ai02 in Si({+32}Si,X) 32SI2cL at 44.78 MeV/nucleon). Also cross section measured in this work. 32SI cL $|d{+32,28}=0.195 fm {I76} (2024Ko07) 32SI cL $R{-ch}=3.153 fm {I12} (2024Ko07) 32SI cL T$weighted average (NRM) of 159.4 y {I56} (2015HeZY); 178 y {I10} 32SI2cL (1998Ni19); 132 y {I13} (1993Ch10, average of 128 y {I20} and 134 y 32SI3cL {I16}); 162 y {I12} (1991Th06); 133 y {I9} (1990Ho27, average of 135 y 32SI4cL {I10}, 132 y {I9} and 136 {I13}, uncertainty increased to 9.9 y in 32SI5cL NRM); 172 y {I4} (1986Al10, uncertainty increased to 7.5 y in NRM); 108 32SI6cL y {I18} (1980El01, uncertainty increased to 20 y in NRM); and 101 y 32SI7cL {I18} (1980Ku11, uncertainty increased to 22 y in NRM). Normalized 32SI8cL |h{+2}=4.4, as compared to critical |h{+2}=2.0. Unweighted average is 32SI9cL 143 y {I10}, while regular weighted average is 161 y {I7}, with 32SIacL normalized |h{+2}=6.4. The T{-1/2} values from indirect methods, 32SIbcL described below, were not used in the averaging procedure because the 32SIccL accumulation rates of {+32}Si in ice cores and sediments are not known 32SIdcL well, and the cross sections in reactions are poorly known for 32SIecL determining yields that were used to determine the half-life in the 32SIfcL pre-1970 measurements. 32SI cL $Direct, specific activity methods for half-life measurement: 32SI2cL 1993Ch10: source from implantation of separated projectile ({+40}Ar 32SI2cL beam) fragments into an inert collector, decay equilibrium technique, 32SI3cL two independent samples. 1991Th06: source produced in {+18}O({+16}O,2p) 32SI4cL reaction. {+32}Si/{+31}Si abundance ratio using AMS (accelerator mass 32SI3cL spectrometry), and |b scintillation spectrometry. 1990Ho27: source 32SI4cL produced in {+37}Cl(p,X) and {+31}P(n,p) reactions. {+32}Si/Si 32SI5cL abundance ratio by AMS, and |b spectrometry; three independent samples. 32SI6cL 1980Ku11: source from {+30}Si(t,p), AMS technique and |b-scintillation 32SI7cL spectrometry. 1980El01: source from Cl(p,X), AMS technique and 32SI8cL |b-scintillation spectrometry. 32SI cL $Direct decay rate methods for half-life measurement: 32SI2cL 2015HeZY: used the same detector system and source as in 1986Al10. 32SI3cL Counting for 6000 hours between June 2013 and June 2015. 32SI4cL 1986Al10: source from {+30}Si(t,p), |b decay rate measured 32SI5cL over four years. 32SI cL $Indirect methods (accumulation rates of the naturally occurring 32SI2cL {+32}Si in different environments) for T{-1/2}: 178 y {I10} (1998Ni19, 32SI3cL measurement of the decrease of activity with depth in an accurately 32SI4cL dated varved sediment core from the Kassjon lake, North Sweden, note 32SI5cL that this value is close to the values from direct measurements, thus 32SI6cL included in averaging); 276 y {I32} (1980De46, natural source from 32SI7cL varved core of Gulf of California, later corrected to 217 y {I29} by 32SI8cL J.B. Cumming, Radiochem. Radioanaly. Lett. 58, 297 (1983)); 330 y {I40} 32SI9cL (1973Cl15, natural source from Greenland ice cores, later corrected to 32SIacL 250 y in 1980De46). 32SI cL $Indirect methods (reaction yields, mainly in successive neutron 32SI2cL captures in {+30}Si) for T{-1/2}: |?280 y (Jantsch, Kernenergie 10, 89 32SI3cL (1967)); |?500 y (1964Ho31); |? 650 y (1962Ge16); |? 42 y (1957Ro59, 32SI4cL 600 y/barn for {+31}Si(n,|g) reaction, and |s=0.07 for E=thermal); |?60 32SI5cL y (1954Tu02); |?710 y (1953Li21). 32SI cL $See 1991Ku26 for a review of {+32}Si half-life measurements, 2009Se07 32SI2cL for discussion of possible oscillations in exponential decay of {+32}Si 32SI3cL in the measurement by 1986Al10; and 2010Ja03 and 2010St07 for 32SI4cL power-spectrum analyses and discussion of variation of decay constant 32SI5cL from solar influence. Using the BNL counting system and the {+32}Si and 32SI6cL {+36}Cl sources (as used by 1986Al10), 2018Fi04 investigated 32SI7cL correlation between the two decays in a 5-hour time interval 32SI8cL immediately following the GW170817 binary neutron star inspiral on 32SI9cL August 17, 2017; claiming observation of a correlation of the two decay 32SIacL rated on August 17, 2017, with an upward fluctuation peaking at 93 min 32SIbcL following the arrival of the gravity wave detected by the LIGO 32SIccL apparatus (2017Ab06). See also 2021Ve11 for separation and 32SIdcL purification of non-carrier-added source of {+32}S in preparation for 32SIecL a precise re-determination of {+32}Si half-life. 32SI L 1941.7 3 2+ 0.57 PS 9 32SIX L XREF=ABCDFG(1930)H 32SI2 L MOME2=0.11 10 (2024He01) 32SI2 L BE2=0.0135 20 32SI cL J$1941.4|g E2 to 0+; L(t,p)=2. 32SI cL T$unweighted average of 0.33 ps {I5} (1974Gu11), 0.64 ps {I22} 32SI2cL (1972Pr18) from DSAM in (t,p|g), 0.54 ps {I8} from ({+22}Ne,2p|g), and 32SI3cL 0.76 ps {I+13-10} from adopted B(E2)|^=0.0135 {I20} from Coulomb 32SI4cL excitation 32SI cL BE2$weighted average of 0.0113 {I33} (1998Ib01) and 0.0143 {I20} 32SI2cL (2024He01) in Coulomb excitation 32SI cL MOME2$from Coulomb excitation (2024He01) 32SI G 1941.8 4 100 E2 32SIB G BE2W=6.0 +11-8 32SIS G CC=0.000293 4$KC=7.28E-6 10$LC=5.19E-7 7$MC=3.42E-8 5 32SIS G IPC=0.000286 4 32SI cG E$unweighted average of 1941.4 {I3} from {+32}Al |b{+-} decay and 32SI2cG 1942.12 {I9} from ({+22}Ne,2p|g). Other: 1930 {I31} from Coulomb 32SI3cG excitation 32SI L 4231.0 4 2+ 0.26 PS 9 32SIX L XREF=ACD 32SI cL J$spin=2 from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); L(t,p)=2 from 0+. 32SI G 2289.4 8 63 7 M1+E2 -0.84 44 32SIB G BM1W=0.0016 +12-7 $BE2W=0.9 +7-6 32SIS G CC=0.000408 26$KC=5.16E-6 14$LC=3.68E-7 10$MC=2.43E-8 7 32SIS G IPC=0.000403 26 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 79 {I22} from {+32}Al |b{+-} decay and 61 {I7} 32SI2cG from (t,p|g) 32SI G 4230.0 15 100 7 (E2) 1.25E-3 2 32SIB G BE2W=0.16 +9-4 32SIS G KC=2.083E-6 29$LC=1.486E-7 21$MC=9.79E-9 14 32SIS G IPC=0.001250 18 32SI cG RI$from (t,p|g). Other: 100 {I22} from {+32}Al |b{+-} decay 32SI L 4984.2 11 0+ 0.30 PS LE 32SIX L XREF=AC(4996)D 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=0 from 0+ 32SI G 3042.3 10 100 [E2] 32SIB G BE2W GE 1.2 32SIS G CC=0.000807 11$KC=3.40E-6 5$LC=2.427E-7 34$MC=1.600E-8 22 32SIS G IPC=0.000803 11 32SI L 5219.9 11 (1+) 80 FS LT 32SIX L XREF=C(5229)DH 32SI cL J$proposed by 1982Fo02 in (t,p) based on shell-model prediction and 32SI2cL possible unnatural-parity state 32SI G 3278 100 [M1,E2] 32SIS G CC=0.00084 7$KC=2.96E-6 8$LC=2.11E-7 6$MC=1.39E-8 4 32SIS G IPC=0.00083 7 32SI cG $B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0078 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>3.1 if E2 32SI L 5289.0 5 3- 137 FS 28 32SIX L XREF=CDH 32SI cL J$spin=3 from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); L(t,p)=3 from 0+ 32SI cL T$weighted average of 180 fs {I62} from ({+22}Ne,2p|g) and 128 fs {I28} 32SI2cL from (t,p|g), both by DSAM 32SI G 1057.9 12 5 (E1(+M2)) 0.0 2 32SIB G BE1W=0.00044 19 32SI cG M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 32SI G 3347.1 100 5 (E1+M2) -0.06 4 1.41E-3 2 32SIB G BE1W=1.16E-4 +30-21 $BM2W=0.17 +32-15 32SIS G KC=2.110E-6 32$LC=1.505E-7 23$MC=9.91E-9 15 32SIS G IPC=0.001404 20 32SI cG M$D+Q from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 32SI L 5412.5 4 1(-) 49 FS LT 32SIX L XREF=D 32SI cL E$see comment for 5427 level. 32SI cL J$spin 1 from p|g(|q) and natural parity suggested from relative 32SI2cL excitation in (t,p|g) 32SI G 1181.5 11 4 [E1] 32SIS G CC=5.70E-5 8$KC=9.69E-6 14$LC=6.92E-7 10$MC=4.56E-8 6 32SIS G IPC=4.65E-5 7 32SIB G BE1W GT 4.6E-4 32SI G 3470.6 100 4 (E1(+M2)) +0.13 33 0.0014514 32SIS G KC=2.04E-6 26$LC=1.45E-7 19$MC=9.6E-9 12 32SIS G IPC=0.00145 14 32SI cG M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 32SIB G BE1W GT 2.1E-4 32SI G 5411.9 12.4 25 (E1) 2.15E-3 3 32SIS G KC=1.188E-6 17$LC=8.47E-8 12$MC=5.58E-9 8 32SIS G IPC=0.002144 30 32SI cG M$D from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 32SIB G BE1W GT 6.6E-6 32SI L 5427 14 2+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL E$this level from (t,p) is considered different from the 5412 level in 32SI2cL (t,p|g), as the spin assignments in (t,p) and (t,p|g) are different. 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+. 32SI L 5504.81 34 5- 32.5 NS 4 32SIX L XREF=CDFH 32SI cL J$3563.8|g E3, |DJ=3 to 2+ 32SI dL J$5- or 4+ from L(t,p)=5,4 with some preference for L=5, as in 32SI2dL (t,p), 1982Fo02 support 5- on the basis that observed cross section 32SI3dL is three times as large as predicted for a 4+ state from theoretical 32SI4dL calculations. 32SI cL T$from 3563|g(t) in ({+22}Ne,2p|g) (2023Wi06). Other: 33.4 ns {I5} 32SI2cL (2002AsZY) 32SI G 3562.84 14 100 E3 32SIB G BE3W=0.0843 11 32SIS G CC=0.000747 10$KC=3.60E-6 5$LC=2.57E-7 4$MC=1.691E-8 24 32SIS G IPC=0.000743 10 32SI cG E,M$from ({++2}Ne,2p|g), with Mult based on |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) 32SI dG $E3 assigned in 2002AsZY, based on (5-) assignment for 5502 level, 32SI2dG but E2 in 1997Fo01 based on 4+ assignment for 5502 level. 32SI L 5583.8 11 (5-) 27 NS 2 ? 32SIX L XREF=F 32SI cL E$level proposed by 1997Fo01 (also 1998Fo07) in {+208}Pb({+37}Cl,X). 32SI2cL But 2002AsZY using {+198}Pt({+37}Cl,X) at 9 MeV/nucleon 32SI3cL did not confirm this level since they did not observe a 79-keV |g ray. 32SI4cL It is not confirmed in ({+22}Ne,2p|g) by 2023Wi06 32SI cL J$assigned in 1997Fo01, from systematics of (5-) to (4+) transitions 32SI2cL in N=18 isotones, e.g., {+34}S and {+36}Ar 32SI cL T$from |g(t) in {+208}Pb({+37}Cl,X) (1997Fo01). 32SI G 79 1 100 ? 32SI cG E$from 1997Fo01 in {+208}Pb({+37}Cl,X), not confirmed by 2002AsZY 32SI2cG and 2023Wi06 32SI L 5772.2 5 (3-) 28 FS 21 32SIX L XREF=DH 32SI cL J$3831|g D+Q to 2+; (3-) from shell-model predictions in ({+22}Ne,2p|g) 32SI cL T$from DSAM in ({+22}Ne,2p|g). Other: <139 fs from DSAM in (t,p|g) 32SI G 3831 100 (E1+M2) 32SI cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=(yes) from level scheme 32SI cG MR$<0.06 from RUL=3 for B(M2)(W.u.) 32SI cG $B(E1)(W.u.)=4|*10{+-4} {I+5-2} if E1 32SI L 5786.0 15 (0,1,2)+ 0.83 PS GE 32SIX L XREF=ACD 32SI cL J$allowed |b feeding (log| {Ift}=4.8) from 1+ parent. One 32SI2cL component of a doublet at 5786 {I6} with L(t,p)=(0) could correspond 32SI3cL this level and the other component could correspond to 5773 level. 32SI G 3844.0 15 100 32SI L 5880.9 14 4+ 12.5 FS 56 32SIX L XREF=H 32SI cL J$3938.9|g E2, |DJ=2 to 2+ 32SI cL T$from DSAM in ({+22}Ne,2p|g) (2003Wi06) 32SI G 3938.9 13 E2 1.15E-3 2 32SIB G BE2W=8 +6-3 32SIS G KC=2.307E-6 32$LC=1.646E-7 23$MC=1.085E-8 15 32SIS G IPC=0.001148 16 32SI cG E,M$from ({+22}Ne,2p|g), with Mult based on |g|g(DCO) and |g(lin pol) 32SI L 5893 8 (3+) 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL E$possible doublet in (p,t) (1982Fo02). 32SI cL J$tentatively proposed by 1980Fo02 in (t,p) based on theoretical 32SI2cL predictions 32SI L 5953.8 7 2+ 55 FS LE 32SIX L XREF=D 32SI cL J$spin=2 from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); 5953|g E2 to 0+. 32SI G 4012 100 4 (M1(+E2)) -0.01 6 1.03E-3 1 32SIB G BM1W GE 0.0044 32SI cG $B(E2)(W.u.)<123 upper limit exceeds RUL=100 32SIS G KC=2.173E-6 30$LC=1.550E-7 22$MC=1.022E-8 14 32SIS G IPC=0.001030 14 32SI cG M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 32SI G 5953 35 4 E2 1.74E-3 2 32SIB G BE2W GE 0.052 32SIS G KC=1.308E-6 18$LC=9.33E-8 13$MC=6.15E-9 9 32SIS G IPC=0.001735 24 32SI L 5967 4 3- 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL E$this level in (p,t) is considered different from the 5954 in (t,p|g), 32SI2cL as the spins from the two studies are different. 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3 from 0+. 32SI L 6171.0 11 (2+) 55 FS LE 32SIX L XREF=C(*6208)D 32SI cL E,J$6208 {I9} with L=1+2 in (t,p) is a doublet. See comment for 6196 32SI2cL level 32SI G 4229 32SI L 6195.8 7 1- 38 FS LE 32SIX L XREF=C(*6208)D 32SI cL E,J$6208 {I9} with L=1+2 in (t,p) is a doublet, with L=1 component 32SI2cL corresponding to the 6196, J=1 level in (t,p|g) and L=2 component 32SI3cL possibly corresponding to the 6170 level in (t,p|g). Spin=1 from 32SI4cL p|g(|q) in (t,p|g) 32SI G 4254 100 9 [E1] 1.78E-3 3 32SIS G KC=1.572E-6 22$LC=1.121E-7 16$MC=7.39E-9 10 32SIS G IPC=0.001776 25 32SIB G BE1W GE 1.3E-4 32SI G 6195 56 9 (E1) 32SIB G BE1W GE 2.2E-5 32SI cG M$D from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 32SI L 6243.1 11 0+ 55 FS LE 32SIX L XREF=C(6256)D 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=0 from 0+ 32SI G 4301 100 [E2] 1.28E-3 2 32SIB G BE2W GE 1.2 32SIS G KC=2.034E-6 28$LC=1.451E-7 20$MC=9.57E-9 13 32SIS G IPC=0.001276 18 32SI L 6347.0 5 (4-) 0.68 PS 10 32SIX L XREF=H 32SI cL J$from shell-model predictions (2023We06) 32SI G 574.9 3 32SI cG E$from ({+22}Ne,2p|g) 32SI G 842.1 3 32SI cG E$from ({+22}Ne,2p|g) 32SI L 6392.1 8 2+ 42 FS LT 32SIX L XREF=C(6394)D 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+ 32SI G 2161 6.4 11 [M1,E2] 32SIS G CC=0.00036 4$KC=5.72E-6 29$LC=4.08E-7 21$MC=2.69E-8 14 32SIS G IPC=0.00035 4 32SI cG $B(M1)(W.u.)>0.0026 if M1, B(E2)(W.u.)>2.4 if E2 32SI G 4450 100.0 11 (M1(+E2)) +0.04 4 1.18E-3 2 32SIB G BM1W GT 0.0055 32SI cG $B(E2)(W.u.)<155 upper limit exceeds RUL=100 32SIS G KC=1.885E-6 26$LC=1.344E-7 19$MC=8.86E-9 12 32SIS G IPC=0.001173 16 32SI cG M$D(+Q) from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 32SI L 6477 6 3- 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3 from 0+. 32SI L 6705.3 6 1- 32SIX L XREF=C(6734)D 32SI cL J$spin=1 from p|g(|q) in (t,p|g); L(t,p)=1 from 0+ 32SI G 2474 22 5 32SI G 4763 9 7 32SI G 6705 100 7 D 32SI L 6860 5 3- 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3 from 0+. 32SI L 7083 5 2+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+. 32SI L 7482 9 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 7743 6 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 7793 9 3-,4+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3,4 from 0+. 32SI L 7887 18 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 7978 14 3- 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3 from 0+. 32SI L 8066 9 2+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+. 32SI L 8321 8 5- 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=5 from 0+. 32SI L 8361 10 2+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+. 32SI L 8422 10 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 8567 8 3- 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3 from 0+. 32SI L 8650 15 2+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=2 from 0+. 32SI L 8758 9 3-,4+ 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI cL J$L(t,p)=3,4 from 0+. 32SI L 8842 13 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 8877 8 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 8971 9 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9003 7 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9192 12 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9203.218 5 1+,2+ S 32SIX L XREF=E 32SI cL E$this value is in disagreement with S(n)=9200.0 {I3} in 2021Wa16. 32SI cL J$s-wave capture in 3/2+ g.s. of {+31}S. 32SI G 9201.798 5 32SI cG E$from (n,|g). 32SI L 9543 6 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9701 6 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9782 12 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9934 29 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 9975 25 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10052 5 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10237 5 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10279 6 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10317 5 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10461 9 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10603 15 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10664 14 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10725 9 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10778 13 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10846 13 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10888 12 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 10971 9 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 11398 7 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI L 11454 8 32SIX L XREF=C 32SI 30SI(T,P) 1982FO02 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI c 1982Fo02: E=15 MeV triton beam was produced from the University of 32SI2c Pennsylvania FN tandem accelerator. Target was |?24 |mg/cm{+2} 32SI3c self-supporting {+30}Si (95.6% enriched). Reaction products were 32SI4c momentum analyzed with a multiangle magnetic spectrograph (FWHM=19 keV) 32SI5c and detected in nuclear emulsion plates. Measured |s(|q) from 7.5|' to 32SI6c 105|'. Deduced levels, L-transfers from DWBA analysis 32SI c Other: 32SI c 1972Pr18: E=2.8 MeV. Spectrum shown at 173|' with 32SI2c 15 groups from 1942 to 6385. FWHM=100 keV 32SI c All data are from 1982Fo02 32SI CL S$LABEL=|s{-max} (mb/sr) 32SI cL E(A)$Doublet 32SI cL E(B),J(B)$5229 and 5893 are possibly unnatural states with J|p=1+ and 32SI2cL 3+, respectively 32SI L 0 0 3.97 32SI L 1943 5 2 0.31 32SI L 4239 8 2 0.029 32SI L 4996 9 0 0.23 32SI L 5229 3 (1+) 0.023 B 32SI L 5295 5 3 0.88 32SI L 5427 14 2 0.075 32SI L 5509 5 4,5 0.38 32SI cL L$4 or 5 with some preference for L=5 32SI L 5786 6 (0) 0.59 A 32SI L 5893 8 (3+) 0.073 B 32SI cL E$possibly a doublet 32SI L 5967 4 3 0.25 32SI L 6208 9 1+2 0.25 A 32SI L 6256 8 0 0.29 32SI L 6394 6 2 2.20 32SI L 6477 6 3 0.50 32SI L 6734 9 1 1.4 32SI L 6860 5 3 0.29 32SI L 7083 5 2 0.23 32SI L 7482 9 0.73 32SI L 7743 6 0.10 32SI L 7793 9 3,4 1.3 32SI L 7887 18 0.084 32SI L 7978 14 3 0.082 32SI L 8066 9 2 0.92 32SI L 8321 8 5 0.19 32SI L 8361 10 2 1.1 32SI L 8422 10 32SI L 8567 8 3 0.29 32SI L 8650 15 2 0.20 32SI L 8758 9 3,4 0.67 32SI L 8842 13 32SI L 8877 8 32SI L 8971 9 32SI L 9003 7 32SI L 9192 12 32SI L 9543 6 32SI L 9701 6 32SI L 9782 12 32SI L 9934 29 32SI L 9975 25 32SI L 10052 5 32SI L 10237 5 32SI L 10279 6 32SI L 10317 5 32SI L 10461 9 32SI L 10603 15 32SI L 10664 14 32SI L 10725 9 32SI L 10778 13 32SI L 10846 13 32SI L 10888 12 32SI L 10971 9 32SI L 11398 7 32SI L 11454 8 32SI 30SI(T,PG) 1974GU11,1972PR18 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI c 1974Gu11: E=2.5-3.3 MeV triton beams were produced from the Nuclear 32SI2c Science and Instrumentation Laboratory at Strasbourg. Target was 300 32SI3c |mg/cm{+2} 95.2% enriched {+32}Si. |g rays were detected with a 32SI4c 100 cm{+3} Ge(Li) detector. Measured E|g, I|g, p|g(|q), Doppler-shift 32SI5c attenuation. Deduced levels, J, |p, T{-1/2}, |g-ray multipolarities, 32SI6c mixing ratios, branching ratios. Comparisons with available data. 32SI d 1974Gu11 supersedes 1974FiZD, 1974FiZS 32SI c 1972Pr18: E=2.7 and 2.8 MeV triton beams were produced from the 32SI2c Lockheed 3.0-MV Van de Graaff accelerator at the Lockheed Palo Alto 32SI3c Research Laboratory. Target was 200 |mg/cm{+2} metallic Si (95.55% 32SI4c enriched). |g rays were detected with a Ge(Li) detector. Measured E|g, 32SI5c p|g(|q), Doppler-shift attenuation. Deduced levels, J, |p, T{-1/2}, 32SI6c |g-ray multipolarities, mixing ratios, branching ratios. 32SI cG $Values of A{-2} and A{-4} are from p|g(|q) correlations, gating on 32SI2cG protons corresponding to associated levels. 32SI cG E$From level-energy differences. |g ray energies are not explicitly 32SI2cG listed in 1974Gu11 and 1972Pr18. 32SI cG RI$From 1974Gu11, unless otherwise noted. 32SI cG RI(X)$Transition seen but branching ratio not known (1974Gu11,1972Pr18) 32SI cG M,MR$From p|g(|q) in 1974Gu11 or 1972Pr18 as noted, with electric or 32SI2cG magnetic nature determined by evaluators based on RUL and measured 32SI3cG T{-1/2} 32SI cL E$From 1974Gu11 and/or 1972Pr18; weighted average is taken when values 32SI2cL are available from both. Level energies in both studies are deduced 32SI3cL based on measured |g-ray energies, which however are not explicitly 32SI4cL listed in both work. 32SI cL J$As proposed in 1974Gu11 for excited levels, based on measured p|g(|q) 32SI2cL and deduced magnetic/electric nature where available, unless otherwise 32SI3cL noted. Assignments from Adopted Levels are given under comments if 32SI4cL different. 32SI cL J(A)$Natural parity suggested by 1974Gu11 based on observed strong 32SI2cL relative excitation at |q=0|' and 180|'. 32SI cL T$From DSAM in 1972Pr18, unless otherwise noted. 32SI cL T(B)$From DSAM in 1974Gu11 32SI PN 7 32SI L 0.0 0+ 32SI L 1941.4 3 2+ 0.35 PS 7 32SI cL E$weighted average of 1941.4 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 1942.5 {I20} 32SI2cL (1972Pr18) 32SI cL T$weighted average of 0.64 ps {I22} (1972Pr18) and 0.33 ps {I5} 32SI2cL (1974Gu11) 32SI G 1941.4 100 E2 32SI2 G A2=+0.63 7$ A4=-1.07 10 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.67 14 $ A4=-1.42 15 (1972Pr18) 32SI L 4232 4 2+ 0.26 PS 9 32SI cL E$weighted average of 4230 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 4234 {I4} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$2 in 1974Gu11 and 1972Pr18 based on p|g(|q); parity from 32SI2cL 2289|g M1+E2 to 2+ level 32SI G 2289 38 4 M1+E2 -0.84 44 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 34 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 41 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$from 1972Pr18 32SI2 G A2=-0.10 11 $ A4=-0.28 11 (1972Pr18) 32SI G 4230 62 4 (E2) 32SI2 G A2=+0.81 10 $ A4=-1.80 10 (1972Pr18) 32SI cG M$(Q) assigned by the evaluator based on |g(|q) in 1972Pr18; (M2) 32SI2cG ruled out by RUL 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 66 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 59 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI L 4984 4 (0+) 0.30 PS LE 32SI cL E$weighted average of 4982 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 4985 {I4} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$other: (0,1,2) in 1972Pr18. 0+ in Adopted Levels 32SI cL $I|g<4 relative to 100 for 3041 for E|g=4982 in 1974Gu11, consistent 32SI2cL with expected nonobservation of E0 transition as a |g ray. 32SI G 3041 100 32SI2 G A2=+0.05 10$ A4=+0.10 10 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.02 6 $ A4=+0.08 6 (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$-0.30 {I16} (1972Pr18) for J|p(4983)=2+ 32SI L 5220 3 (1:4) 80 FS LT B 32SI cL E$weighted average of 5220 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 5222 {I7} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$other: >1 in 1972Pr18. (1+) in Adopted Levels 32SI G 990 1 LT ? 32SI G 3278 100 32SI2 G A2=+0.30 12$ A4=+0.12 13 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.26 4 $ A4=+0.11 5 (1972Pr18) 32SI G 5219 2 LT ? 32SI L 5288.9 8 3(-) 128 FS 28 A 32SI cL E$weighted average of 5288.8 {I8} (1974Gu11) and 5290 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$other: 3 in 1972Pr18. 3- in Adopted Levels 32SI cL T$weighted average of 118 fs {I28} (1974Gu11) and 187 fs {I69} 32SIxcL (1972Pr18) 32SI G 1057.9 11 4 D(+Q) 0.0 2 32SI2 G A2=-0.44 20$ A4=+0.12 20 (1974Gu11) 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 12 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 10 {I4} (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$from 1974Gu11 32SI G 3347.1 89 4 D+Q -0.06 4 32SI2 G A2=-0.40 7 $ A4=+0.04 9 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=-0.18 1 $ A4=-0.03 1 (1972Pr18) 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 88 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 90 {I4} (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$weighted average of -0.07 {I4} (1972Pr18) and -0.03 {I7} (1974Gu11) 32SI G 5288.8 3 LT ? 32SI L 5412.5 9 1(-) 49 FS LT A 32SI cL E$weighted average of 5412.4 {I9} (1974Gu11) and 5413 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$other: 1 in 1972Pr18 32SI cL T$<49 fs (1974Gu11), |<51 fs (1972Pr18) 32SI G 1181.5 9 3 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 11 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 8 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI G 3470.6 81 3 D(+Q) +0.13 33 32SI cG MR$from 1972Pr18 32SI2 G A2=+0.22 12$ A4=+0.09 16 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.10 7 $ A4=-0.11 7 (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$from 1972Pr18 for J|p(5412)=1-. Other: 0.0 {I6} (1974Gu11) 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 79 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 83 {I4} (1972Pr18) 32SI G 5411.9 10 2 D 32SI2 G A2=+0.4 5 $ A4=+0.3 6 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=-0.21 8 $ A4=-0.01 8 (1972Pr18) 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 10 {I2} (1974Gu11) and 9 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI L 5502 4 32SI cL E$from 1974Gu11. Other: 5499 (1972Pr18) 32SI G 1271 8 LT ? 32SI G 3560 100 32SI G 5502 20 LT ? 32SI L 5773 3 (1,2,3) 139 FS LT 32SI cL E$weighted average of 5774 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 5772 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL T$<139 fs (1974Gu11 and 1972Pr18) 32SI G 3831 100 D+Q 32SI2 G A2=-0.20 8 $ A4=-0.08 9 (1974Gu11) 32SI L 5791 3 (0,1,2)+ 0.83 PS GE 32SI cL E$weighted average of 5792 {I4} (1974Gu11) and 5790 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL T$other: >0.55 ps (1974Gu11) 32SI G 3851 100 32SI L 5955 3 2 55 FS LE 32SI cL E$weighted average of 5953 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 5956 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$2+ in Adopted Levels 32SI cL T$other: <69 fs (1974Gu11) 32SI G 4012 74 3 D(+Q) -0.01 6 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 72 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 77 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$from 1972Pr18 for J|p(5955)=2+. Other: +0.1 {I2} (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.50 11$ A4=-0.24 13 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.44 3 $ A4=-0.06 3 (1972Pr18) 32SI G 5953 26 3 E2 32SI cG RI$weighted average of 28 {I3} (1974Gu11) and 23 {I3} (1972Pr18) 32SI2 G A2=+0.44 12$ A4=-0.92 17 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.55 4 $ A4=-1.13 4 (1972Pr18) 32SI L 6170 5 55 FS LE 32SI cL E$from 1972Pr18 32SI G 4229 X 32SI L 6196 5 1 38 FS LE 32SI cL E$weighted average of 6195 {I5} (1974Gu11) and 6196 {I5} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$1- in Adopted Levels 32SI G 4254 64 6 32SI G 6195 36 6 D 32SI2 G A2=-0.41 8 $ A4=-0.08 10 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=-0.31 3 $ A4=-0.01 3 (1972Pr18) 32SI L 6242 5 55 FS LE 32SI cL E$from 1972Pr18 32SI G 4301 X 32SI L 6388 5 2 42 FS LT B 32SI cL E$weighted average of 6391 {I5} (1974Gu11) and 6385 {I5} (1972Pr18) 32SI cL J$2+ in Adopted Levels 32SI cL T$other: |<50 fs (1972Pr18) 32SI G 2161 6 1 32SI G 4450 94 1 D(+Q) +0.04 4 32SI2 G A2=+0.80 8 $ A4=-0.17 11 (1974Gu11) 32SI2 G A2=+0.46 1$ A4=-0.01 1 (1972Pr18) 32SI cG MR$from 1972Pr18 for J|p(6388)=2+. Other: +0.5 {I2} (1974Gu11) 32SI G 6388 3 LT ? 32SI L 6705 6 1 32SI cL E$from 1974Gu11 only 32SI cL J$1- in Adopted Levels 32SI G 2474 17 4 32SI G 4763 7 5 32SI G 6705 76 5 D 32SI2 G A2=-0.78 11$ A4=+0.17 18 (1974Gu11) 32SI COULOMB EXCITATION 2024HE01,1998IB01 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI c 2024He01: {+196}Pt({+32}Si,{+32}Si'|g) E=3.5 MeV/nucleon {+32}Si beam 32SI2c was produced from the ReA6 facility at NSCL. Target was 1.59 mg/cm{+2} 32SI3c {+196}Pt. |g rays were detected with the SeGA array consisting of 16 32SI4c HPGe detectors and charged particles were detected with the JANUS setup 32SI5c consisting of a pair of S3-type annular double-side Si detectors. 32SI6c Measured E|g, I|g, |g-ray yields. Deduced |g-ray transition strength, 32SI7c spectroscopic quadrupole moment. Comparisons with available data and 32SI8c theoretical calculations. Coulomb excitation yields were analyzed with 32SI9c the GOSIA code. 32SI c 1998Ib01: {+197}Au({+32}Si,{+32}Si'|g) E=37.4 MeV/nucleon {+32}Si 32SI2c secondary beam was produced by fragmentation of a 80 MeV/nucleon 32SI3c {+40}Ar primary beam from the K1200 cyclotron on a 356 mg/cm{+2} {+9}Be 32SI4c production target at NSCL. The reaction target was a 184 mg/cm{+2} 32SI5c {+197}Au. Scattered particles were detected with a fast/slow plastic 32SI6c phoswich detector and |g rays were detected with an array of 39 32SI7c cylindrical NaI(Tl) detectors. Measured E|g, I|g, particle-|g-coin. 32SI8c Deduced B(E2) for the first 2+ level. 32SI cL J$From Adopted Levels 32SI L 0 0+ 32SI L 1930 31 2+ 32SI2 L BE2=0.0143 20 (2024He01) 32SI cL $B(E2)=0.0113 {i33} (1998Ib01) 32SI2 L MOME2=0.11 10 (2024He01) 32SI cL $Cross section=22 mb {I6} (1998Ib01) 32SI cL $<0+||E2||2+>=0.120 eb {I8} (2024He01) 32SI cL $<2+||E2||2+>=0.14 eb {I13} (2024He01) 32SI G 1930 31 [E2] 32SI cG E$from 1998Ib01 32SI 32AL B- DECAY (32.3 MS) 1986DU07,1984GU19,1982MU0825NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3e (17-Jun-2020) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr. 32SI c 1986Du07: {+32}Al source was produced by fragmentation of 60 32SI2c MeV/nucleon {+40}Ar beam on a 190 mg/cm{+2} Be target, separated by 32SI3c the LISE spectrometer, and implanted into a thin movable film. |b 32SI4c particles were detected with a plastic scintillator and |g rays were 32SI5c detected with a Ge detector. Measured E|g, I|g, |b|g-coin, |b|g(t). 32SI6c Deduced parent T{-1/2}. 32SI c 1984Gu19: {+32}Al source was produced by fragmentation of a 30 g/cm{+2} 32SI2c iridium target by 10 GeV protons from the CERN synchrotron, separated 32SI3c by a mass spectrometer, and transported into a thin stainless steel 32SI4c tube. |g rays were detected with Ge(Li) detectors and delayed-neutrons 32SI5c were detected with a {+3}He proportional counter. Measured E|g, I|g. 32SI6c Deduced levels, |b-decay and |g-ray emission probabilities. 32SI c 1982Mu08: identified {+32}Al isotope and measured T{-1/2} at LBL. 32SI c Others: measured T{-1/2}: 2017Ha23, 2005Ue01, 2008ReZZ (1995ReZZ) 32SI c From RADLIST code, the total energy released is 12990 keV {I150}, 32SI2c compared with 12887 keV {I65} from Q(|b{+-})value=12978 {I7} and 32SI3c branching of 99.3% for population of levels in {+32}Al by |b{+-} decay 32SI c Placements of |g transitions are based on those in Adopted Levels, 32SI2c Gammas. No decay scheme is given in 1986Du07 32SI c This decay scheme is considered incomplete due to a large gap between 32SI2c the highest observed level at E=5786 and the Q(|b{+-})value=12978 {I7} 32SI3c (2021Wa16). S(n)=9200.0 {I3} and S(2n)=15787.36 {I30} (2021Wa16) for 32SI4c {+32}Si 32SI cB IB,LOGFT$|b intensity from |g intensity balance at each level, unless 32SI2cB otherwise noted. Quoted values should be considered as approximate 32SI3cB due to incomplete decay scheme. 32SI cG E,RI$From 1986Du07, unless otherwise stated 32SI cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas 32SI cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies. 32SI cL J,T$From Adopted Levels 32AL P 0 1+ 32.3 MS 4 12978 7 32AL cP J,T$From Adopted Levels of {+32}Al 32AL cP QP$from 2021Wa16 32SI N 0.120 5 1.0 1.0 32SI cN NR$From absolute I|g(1941.4|g)=12.0% {I5}, determined in 1984Gu19 32SI2cN from measured counts of 1941.4|g transitions and {+32}Al decays. 32SI cN BR$%|b{+-}n=0.7 {I5} for {+32}Al decay (2008ReZZ,1995ReZZ) 32SI PN 3 32SI L 0.0 0+ 157 Y 7 32SI B 86.3 7 4.34 32SIS B EAV=6217.8 35 32SI cB IB$from 100-|SI|b(excited levels), assuming no missing/unobserved 32SI2cB feedings. But due to the incomplete decay scheme, there could be 32SI3cB unobserved |g feedings from possible levels within the gap between 32SI4cB the highest observed level and the Q(|b{+-})value. Other: 85 {I5} 32SI5cB deduced by 1984Gu19 in the same way using their measured |g-ray 32SI6cB intensities. Despite possible missing feedings, the |b-feeding to g.s. 32SI7cB is considered strong 32SI L 1941.44 302+ 0.57 PS 9 32SI B 4.7 8 5.3 32SIS B EAV=5260.0 35 32SI cB IB$other: 3 {I4} (1984Gu19) 32SI G 1941.4 3 100 E2 32SIS G CC=0.000293 4$KC=7.28E-6 10$LC=5.19E-7 7$MC=3.42E-8 5 32SIS G IPC=0.000286 4 32SI2 G %IG=12.0 5 32SI cG E$from 1984Gu19. Other E|g=1941.4 {I5} (1986Du07) 32SI L 4230.8 8 2+ 0.26 PS 9 32SI B 3.0 5 5.0 32SIS B EAV=4129.7 35 32SI G 2289.4 8 11 3 M1+E2 -0.84 44 32SIS G CC=0.000406 24$KC=5.15E-6 14$LC=3.67E-7 10$MC=2.42E-8 6 32SIS G IPC=0.000401 24 32SI2 G %IG=1.3 4 32SI G 4230.0 15 14 3 (E2) 32SI2 G %IG=1.7 4 32SI L 4983.9 11 0+ 0.30 PS LE 32SI B 4.3 6 4.6 32SIS B EAV=3756.0 35 32SI cB IB$other: 12 {I3} (1984Gu19) 32SI G 3042.3 10 36 5 32SI2 G %IG=4.3 6 32SI cG E$weighted average of 3042.6 {I12} (1984Gu19) and 3042.1 {I10} 32SI2cG (1986Du07) 32SI cG RI$other: 74 {I20} (1984Gu19) 32SI dG $%I|g: other: 9.0 {I25} (1984Gu19) 32SI L 5785.7 15 (0,1,2)+ 0.83 PS GE 32SI B 1.7 4 4.8 32SIS B EAV=3360.4 35 32SI G 3844.0 15 14 3 32SI2 G %IG=1.7 4 32SI L 9200.0+X R 32SI cL E$x<3778 {I7} from Q(|b{+-})({+32}Al)-S(n)({+32}Si), where 32SI2cL Q(|b{+-})=12978 {I7} and S(n)=9200.0 {I3} from 2021Wa16. This 32SI3cL represents a range of unobserved levels that subsequently decay to 32SI4cL {+31}Al via one-neutron emission. 32SI B 0.7 5 32SI cB IB$from adopted %|b{+-}n=0.7 {I5} for {+32}Al decay (2008ReZZ,1995ReZZ) 32SI 33AL B-N DECAY (41.5 MS) 2019LI41,2017LiZZ,2008REZZ25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI c 2019Li41, 2017LiZZ: measured |b and |g spectroscopic data for decay 32SI2c chains of {+34}Mg and {+33}Al at CERN-ISOLDE. 32SI c 2017Ha23: measured half-life of {+33}Al decay 32SI c 2008ReZZ, 1995ReZZ: measured half-life and %|b{+-}n at TOFI 32SI cL J,T$From Adopted Levels 33AL P 0 (5/2)+ 41.5 MS 1 7509 7 33AL cP J$From {+33}Al Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database (March 2011 update) 33AL cP T$Weighted average of 41.4 ms {I1} (2017Ha23, ion-|b correlated decay 33AL2cP curve); and 41.7 ms {I2} (2002Mo29, ion-|b correlated decay curve). 33AL3cP Other: 41 ms {I3} (2008ReZZ,1995ReZZ, n|b- or n|g-decay curves); 33AL4cP 41.7 ms {I2} in the ENSDF database (2011 update) 33AL cP QP$From 2021Wa16 32SI N 0.085 7 0.085 7 32SI cN BR$%|b{+-}n=8.5 {I7} (2008ReZZ,1995ReZZ) for the decay of {+33}Al 32SI L 0.0 0+ 157 Y 7 32SI L 1942 2+ 0.57 PS 9 32SI cL E$rounded value from Adopted Levels 32SI G 1942 32SI cG E$rounded value from Adopted Gammas 32SI cG $Absolute intensity=22% {I5} per 100 decays of {+33}Al is deduced in 32SI2cG 2019Li41,2017LiZZ using measured counts of {+33}Al decays and 32SI3cG 1942 transition, but this value exceeds %|b{+-}n=8.5% measured in 32SI4cG 2008ReZZ,1995ReZZ by a factor of |?2.6, which suggests either a much 32SI5cG higher %|b{+-}n value for {+33}Al decay or an overcounted/incorrect 32SI6cG intensity of 1942|g in 2019Li41,2017LiZZ 32SI 12C(22NE,2PG) 2023WI06 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI dL E$Least-squares fitting is done by GLSC (version 11-Oct-2024) 32SI c Adapted from the XUNDL dataset for 2023Wi06, compiled by G. G~urdal 32SI2c (NNDC,BNL) on December 4, 2023 32SI c 2023Wi06: E=56.3 MeV {+22}Ne beam was produced from the ISAC-II 32SI2c facility of TRIUMF. Target was a 500 |mg/cm{+2} self-supporting foil of 32SI3c natural carbon and another target with a 394 |mg/cm{+2} layer of 32SI4c {+nat}C was used for lifetime measurements. |g-rays were detected using 32SI5c the TIGRESS array consisting of 14 segmented HPGe clovers and charged 32SI6c particles were detected using a 128-channel spherical CsI(Tl) array. 32SI7c Measured E|g, |g|g(|q)(DCO), |g(lin pol), Doppler-shift attenuation. 32SI8c Deduced levels, J, |p, T{-1/2}, |g-ray multipolarties, transition 32SI9c strengths. Comparison with theoretical calculations. 32SI cG $B(E2) and B(E3) values under comments are from 2023Wi06. 32SI cG E$From 2023Wi06. 32SI cG M$From the R{-DCO}, |D{-asym} and the decay pattern in 2023Wi06. 32SI2cG Expected R{-DCO} values are |?0.5 for stretched dipole transitions 32SI3cG and |?1.0 for stretched quadrupole or octupole transitions when 32SI4cG gating on a coincident stretched quadurpole transition. Positive 32SI5cG polarization asymmetry |D{-asym} indicates electric nature and 32SI6cG negative value for magnetic nature of a transition. 32SI cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies, assuming |DE|g=1 keV 32SI2cL where not given. 32SI cL J$As proposed in 2023Wi06 based on measured |g|g(DCO), |g(lin pol), 32SI2cL and known assignments of low-lying states, unless otherwise stated. 32SI cL T$From DSAM with GEANT4 simulations in 2023Wi06, unless otherwise 32SI2cL noted 32SI cL J(A)$From Adopted Levels 32SI cL J(B)$From shell-model predictions (2023We06) 32SI L 0 0+ A 32SI L 1942.19 9 2+ 541 FS 83 A 32SI G 1942.13 9 [E2] 32SI cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=6.3 {I+11-8} 32SI L 5221.4 10 (1+) A 32SI G 3279 32SI L 5287.4 10 3- 180 FS 62 A 32SI G 3345 32SI L 5505.25 17 5- 32.5 NS 4 32SI cL J$3562.8|g E3, |DJ=3 to 2+ 32SI cL T$from 3562.84|g(t) of TIGRESS-CsI timing distribution (2023Wi06). 32SI2cL Other: 30.5 ns {I28} from |g|g(t) using 842.1|g and 3562.84|g. The 32SI3cL authors of 2023Wi06 stated that the large uncertainty in |g|g(t) is due 32SI4cL to the lower statistics. 32SI G 217 [E2] S 32SI cG E$not observed; from level-energy difference 32SI cG $B(E2)(W.u.)<0.053, from intensity limit of unobserved transition 32SI2cG (2023Wi06) 32SI G 3562.84 14 E3 32SI cG $R{-DCO}=1.06 {I4}, |D{-asym}=+0.032 {I13}. 32SI cG $B(E3)(W.u.)=0.0841 {I10}. 32SI L 5772.45 42 (3-) 28 FS 21 B 32SI G 3830 32SI L 5881.4 13 4+ 12.5 FS 56 32SI cL J$3938.9|g E2, |DJ=2 to 2+ 32SI G 3938.9 13 E2 32SI cG $R{-DCO}=1.00 {I9}, |D{-asym}=+0.07 {I3}. 32SI cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=8 {I+7-3} 32SI L 6347.36 33 (4-) 0.68 PS 10 B 32SI G 574.9 3 32SI G 842.1 3 32SI 31SI(N,G) E=TH 2001PA52 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI c 2001Pa52 (also 1997Ro26): E(n)=thermal from the high-flux reactor of 32SI2c ILL in Grenoble. |g rays were detected with HPGe detectors. Measured 32SI3c prompt E|g from the capture state to g.s.. Measurement is under the 32SI4c AVOGADRO metrology project. 32SI c 1991Th03: E(n)=thermal and epithermal from the DR-3 reactor at Research 32SI2c Center Riso, Denmark. Measured capture |s, and isotope ratio of {+32}Si 32SI3c and {+30}Si. Measured |s=73 mb {I6} for thermal neutrons. 32SI L 0.0 0+ 32SI L 9203.218 5 1+,2+ S 32SI cL E$this value is in disagreement with S(n)=9200.0 {I3} in 2021Wa16 32SI cL J$s-wave capture in 3/2+ g.s. of {+31}S 32SI G 9201.798 5 32SI cG E$from 2001Pa52 32SI 208PB(37CL,XG) 1997FO01 25NDS 202503 32SI H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 201, 1 (2025)$CUT=31-Oct-2024$ 32SI c 1997Fo01 (also 1998Fo07): E=230 MeV {+37}Cl beam was produced from the 32SI2c Legnaro superconducting linear accelerator ALPI. Target was 50 32SI3c mg/cm{+2} {+208}Pb. |g rays were detected with the GASP array 32SI4c consisting of 40 Compton-suppressed Ge detectors. Measured E|g, I|g, 32SI5c |g|g-coin, |g(t), yield. Deduced levels, T{-1/2}. 32SI c Other: 32SI c 2002AsZY: {+198}Pt({+37}Cl,X) E=9 MeV/nucleon. Measured E|g, 32SI2c I|g, |g|g-coin, (fragment)|g-coin, deduced isomer. Set of four Ge 32SI3c detectors used 32SI L 0 0+ 32SI L 1942 2+ 32SI cL J$from the Adopted Levels 32SI G 1942 32SI cG E$from 1997Fo01 32SI L 5502 4 32SI cL J$(4+) assigned by 1997Fo01, but 2002AsZY assign (5-) 32SI cL T$2002AsZY assign isomer of T{-1/2}=33.4 ns {I5} to this state. 32SI G 3560 32SI L 5581 4 27 NS 2 32SI cL E$level proposed by 1997Fo01 (also 1998Fo07). 32SI2cL But 2002AsZY using {+198}Pt({+37}Cl,X) at 9 MeV/nucleon 32SI3cL did not confirm this level since they did not observe 79-keV |g ray 32SI cL J$(5-) assigned by 1997Fo01, based on systematics of (5-) to (4+) 32SI2cL transitions in N=18 isotones ({+34}S and {+36}Ar), but 2002AsZY assign 32SI3cL 5- to 5502 level 32SI cL T$from |g(t) in 1997Fo01. 2002AsZY report an isomer with 32SI2cL T{-1/2}=33.1 ns {I5} but assign this isomer to 5502 state (33.4 ns {I5} 32SI3cL from Fig.1 of 2002AsZY) 32SI G 79 1 32SI cG E$from 1997Fo01, not confirmed by 2002AsZY. It should be pointed 32SI2cG out that 1997Fo01 used a much bigger (GASP) array for |g ray detection 32SI3cG than the four-detector arrangement used by 2002AsZY.