58CO ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO Q 381.6 11 8572.9 12 6954.3 11-6714.9 16 2012WA38 58CO cQ $S(2n)=19949.4 {I12}, S(2p)=17513.7 {I11} (2012Wa38) 58CO D 58NI(n,p),E=5.89,10.11,15.87 MeV: 2015Sh11: measured |s 58CO D CU(|a,X),E=15-42 MeV: 2015Sh25: measured |s 58CO D CU(p,X),E=250 MeV: 2015Zh09: measured |s 58CO D NI(P,X) E<34 MEV: 2015He05: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D 58NI(N,P), CO(N,X) E<180 MEV: 2015Mi01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D ZN(D,X) E<23 MEV: 2015Ud01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D NI(P,X) E<65 MEV: 2014Am02: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D FE(D,X) E<20 MEV: 2014Av01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D CO(P,X) E<70 MEV: 2013Di18: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D NI(D,X) E<50 MEV: 2013He05: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D RE(P,X) E<2590 MEV: 2013Is01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D FE(D,X) E<24 MEV: 2013Ud02: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D FE(D,X) E<20 MEV: 2011Za08: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION 58CO D FE(P,XN) E<18.5 MEV: 2009Al01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION, YIELD 58CO D $58FE(P,N) E=1-20 MEV: 2009Av03: ANALYZED SIGMA, PARTICLE EMISSION 58CO2D SPECTRA 58CO D TI(D,^X) E<10 MEV: 2009Ki01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTION, YIELD 58CO D 59CO(N,2N) E<20 MEV: 2009Zh02: ANALYZED SIGMA(THETA) 58CO D $58NI(N,P) E=REACTOR: 2008Jo06: MEASURED EG, IG, AVERAGED CROSS SECTION 58CO D $58NI(N,P) E<20 MeV: 2009La04: calculated excitation functions 58CO D NI(P,X) E=5-27 MEV: 2007Al01: MEASURED EXCITATION FUNCTIONS 58CO D 2007Na31: 136XE(P,X) E=1 GEV/NUCLEON, MEASURED CROSS SECTION 58CO c Structure calculations (levels, transition probabilities, etc.): 58CO2c 2004Ho08, 1999Ca29, 1978Ta07 58CO D OTHER THEORY REFERENCES: 2008AlZZ 58CO c CCBA=coupled channels Born approximation 58CO cG E,RI$ Weighted averages of values from (|a,n|g), ({+10}B,p2n|g), 58CO2cG ({+3}He,|g) and (p,|g) 58CO cG M$ From |g|g(|q)(DCO) in ({+10}B,p2n|g), |g(|q) in (|a,n|g) and/or 58CO2cG (p,n|g) and |DJ|p, unless indicated otherwise 58CO cG MR$ From (|a,n|g), except where noted otherwise 58CO cG CC$From BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr. 58CO2cG If no |d value given, it was assumed 1.00 for E2/M1, 58CO cL E$ From least-squares fit to E|g data for levels populated in |g-ray 58CO2cL studies. Others are weighted averages from particle-transfer data. 58CO3cL The levels at 1290, 1750 and 2770 in (d,n) are most likely composites 58CO4cL of several levels because of the poor energy resolution (FWHM|?300 keV) 58CO cL E(Y)$8549.4+8552.3 and 8625.1+8628.0 doublets are possible candidates 58CO2cL for analog states of the 2782, 1+ and 2876, 2+ levels, respectively, 58CO3cL in {+58}Fe 58CO cL T$From DSAM in (|a,n|g) and ({+10}B,p2n|g), except where 58CO2cL noted otherwise 58CO cL J$In in-beam |g-ray studies: {+55}Mn(|a,n|g) and {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g), 58CO2cL ascending order of spins is assumed as the excitation energy 58CO3cL rises. When J|p is deduced from L-transfers in particle transfer 58CO4cL reactions, the target J|p values are as follows: 1/2- 58CO5cL for {+57}Fe in (d,n) and ({+3}He,d) reactions; 7/2- for {+59}Co in 58CO6cL (d,t) and (p,d) reactions; 0+ in (t,{+3}He), (d,{+2}He), ({+3}He,t), 58CO6cL ({+3}He,p), (p,n), (|a,d) and (d,|a) reactions. 58CO cL J(A) J|p=1+ from L=0+2 in ({+3}He,p) 58CO cL J(B) J|p=0+,1+ from L=0 in ({+3}He,p) 58CO cL J(C) From L and vector analyzing power in (d,|a) 58CO cL J(D) From DWBA analysis and cross section systematics in (|a,d) 58CO cL J(E)$L=2+4 for 366+374 in (t,{+3}He), J|p=(5)+ for L=4 component from 58CO2cL vector-analyzing power in (|a,d), and J=3 for 366 from |g(|q) in 58CO3cL (|a,n|g) establish J|p=3+ and 5+ for the 366 and 374 levels, 58CO4cL respectively. 58CO cL J(F) From CCBA in (t,{+3}He) 58CO cL J(G)$ L(d,|a)=2 and L({+3}He,d)=1 for one or more of the 1513, 1523 58CO2cL and 1524 levels, L(t,{+3}He)=2 suggests 2+,3+ for 1523 or 1524 levels 58CO cL J(H)$ L({+3}He,p)=0+2 for E=1372 {I15}; J|p=1+ for E=1377 {I10} 58CO2cL in (t,{+3}He) and L({+3}He,d)=1 for both 1369 and 1383 levels give 1+ 58CO3cL the 1369 and 1376 levels 58CO CL BAND(I)$ GS Band. 58CO CL BAND(J)$ |g cascade based on 6+. 58CO CL BAND(K)$ |g cascade based on 5+. 58CO CL BAND(L)$ |g cascade based on 7+. 58CO CL BAND(M)$ Band based on 4+. 58CO CL BAND(N)$ |g cascade based on (8)+ 58CO CL BAND(P)$ Band based on 6+ 58CO XA58CO IT DECAY (9.10 H) 58CO XR51V(10B,P2NG) 58CO XB55MN(A,NG) 58CO XP56FE(T,NG) 58CO XD56FE(3HE,P) 58CO XE56FE(3HE,PG) 58CO XF56FE(A,D) 58CO XG57FE(P,G) 58CO XH57FE(D,N),(D,NG) 58CO XI57FE(3HE,D) 58CO XJ58FE(P,N),(P,NG) 58CO XQ58FE(3HE,T) 58CO XS58NI(D,2HE) 58CO XK58NI(T,3HE) 58CO XL59CO(N,2NG) 58CO XM59CO(P,D) 58CO XN59CO(D,T) 58CO XO59CO(3HE,A) 58CO XC60NI(D,A),(POL D,A) 58CO PN 6 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 I 58COX L XREF=-(S) 58CO2 L %EC+%B+=100 58CO2 L MOMM1=+4.044 8 (1972Ni01,2014StZZ) 58CO2 L MOME2=+0.23 3 (1972Ni01,2013StZZ,2014StZZ) 58CO cL J$ 1,2 from paramagnetic resonance (1957Do38); L(d,n)=3 from 1/2- 58CO2cL does not allow J=1. Also L(d,|a)=L({+3}He,p)=L(t,{+3}He)=2; 58CO3cL L({+3}He,d)=1, L(d,t)=1+3 58CO cL MOMM1,MOME2$NMR on oriented nuclei (1972Ni01). Others: 58CO2cL |m=+4.040 {I14} (1957Do38,EPR method), 3.5 {I3} (1952Da19, nuclear 58CO3cL orientation). 58CO cL T$weighted average of 70.77 d {I12} (measured value of 70.75 d {I7} in 58CO2cL 1982HoZJ reanalyzed by 2002Un02, 2012Fi12 and 2014Un01); 70.916 d {I15} 58CO3cL (1980Ho17), 70.81 d {I3} (1976Va30), 70.78 d {I4} (1975La16), 58CO4cL 71.1 d {I2} (1972We17), 70.8 d {I9} (1972Cr02), 70.4 d {I10} 58CO5cL (1972Cr02), 71.5 d {I8} (1968De08), 71.3 d {I2} (1956Sc87). 58CO6cL Other measurements: 72 d {I6} (1973ArZI), 71.0 d (1955Co31), 75 d {I3} 58CO7cL (1952Ru23), 72 d {I4} (1952Ho58), 72 d (1941Li01). 58CO8cL In the Limitation of Relative Statistical Weight (LRSW) method 58CO9cL the uncertainty of 1980Ho17 was increased from 0.015 to 0.022 to 58COAcL reduce its relative weight to 50%. The LRSW method increased 58COBcL the final uncertainty to 0.06 to include the most precise value 58COCcL of 70.916 d. This result agrees with the evaluation of 1991BaZS, 58CODcL except for a small reduction in the uncertainty. In November 2013 58COEcL DDEP evaluation (www.nucleide.org), T{-1/2}=70.85 d {I3}, and in 58COFcL 2013Be43 compilation it is listed as 70.83 d {I10} 58CO L 24.95 6 5+ 9.10 H 9 KM1 58COX L XREF=ABCFGHJKLMNOR 58CO2 L %IT=100 58COF L FLAG=C 58CO cL T$weighted average of 9.15 h {I10} (1967St23) and 8.94 h {I17} 58CO2cL (1970Ca19). Others: 9.0 h {I2} (1960Pr05,1952Av17), 9.2 h {I2} 58CO3cL (1952Ho58, 1950Ch62) 58CO G 24.889 21 100 M3 2.52E3 58CO cG E from {+58}Co IT decay 58COB G BM3W=0.607 11 58COS G KC=1.84E3 3$LC=592 9$MC=84.5 13 58COS G NC=2.08 3 58CO cG $|d(E4/M3)<0.009 from |d{+2}=2.7|*10{+-5} {I55} (deduced in 2006Ra03 58CO2cG evaluation from measured subshell ratios). See IT decay dataset 58CO L 53.15 7 4+ 10.5 US 3 MM2 58COX L XREF=BCGHIJKLNOR 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO2 L MOMM1=+4.184 8 (1970Be33,2014StZZ) 58CO cL MOMM1$stroboscopic observation of perturbed angular distribution 58CO2cL (1970Be33). 58CO cL T$weighted average of 10.4 |ms {I3} in (p,n|g), 58CO2cL 11.4 |ms {I6} in (|a,n|g) and 10.2 |ms {I6} in (|g,n) (1964Br27) 58CO cL J$L({+3}He,d)=3; E2+M1 |g to 5+; |g to 2+ 58CO G 28.30 15 43 5 E2+M1 -2.3 4 51 4 58CO cG MR$-0.33 {I6} or -2.3 {I4} from |g(|q) data in (d,n|g). However, 58CO2cG comparison of experimental and theoretical cross sections and 58CO3cG isomer ratios from {+58}Ni(n,p) and {+59}Co(n,2n) reactions over 58CO4cG incident neutron energy range of 0.97 to 20.35 MeV (1999Av04, 2004Se01, 58CO5cG and 2015HoZZ) support |d(E2/M1)=2.3 over 0.33 58COB G BM1W=2.2E-7 8$BE2W=2.7 6 58COS G KC=41 3$LC=8.3 6$MC=1.12 9$ NC=0.0200 14 58CO G 52.96 13 100 [E2] 5.97 10 58CO cG RI$from weighted average of I|g(28)/I|g(53)=0.40 {I3} (|a,n|g), 58CO2cG 0.62 {I12} (d,n|g), and 0.56 {I8} (p,|g) 58COB G BE2W=0.33 4 58COS G KC=5.18 9$LC=0.688 12$MC=0.0935 17 58COS G NC=0.00271 5 58CO L 111.76 7 3+ 0.14 NS 3 I 58COX L XREF=BCEGIJKLMNOPR 58CO2 L MOMM1=+2.22 39 (1972Ha61,2014StZZ) 58CO cL MOMM1$integral PAD (1972Ha61) for T{-1/2}=0.18 ns 58CO cL T$weighted average of 0.18 ns {I3} in (p,n|g) and 58CO2cL 0.12 ns {I2} in (|a,n|g) 58CO cL J dipole |gs to 2+ and 4+; L({+3}He,d)=3 58CO G 58.49 1263 6 M1(+E2) -0.02 3 0.177 9 58CO cG M$B(E1)(W.u.)=0.006 disfavors E1 assignment 58COB G BM1W=0.28 5$BE2W=(6.E+1 +15-6) 58COS G KC=0.158 8$LC=0.0162 10$MC=0.00225 13 58COS G NC=9.7E-5 4 58CO G 111.52 15100 (M1(+E2)) -0.02 2 0.0305 6 58CO cG MR other: -0.04 {I2} (1972Ha61) in (p,n|g) 58CO cG RI I|g(112)/I|g(58)=1.59 {I14} which is a weighted average of 58CO2cG 1.72 {I21} (|a,n|g) and 1.50 {I18} (p,n|g) 58COB G BM1W=(0.064 9)$BE2W=(4 +7-4) 58COS G KC=0.0274 6$LC=0.00275 6$MC=0.000383 8 58COS G NC=1.67E-5 3 58CO L 365.66 7 3+ 1.1 PS +6-3 E 58COX L XREF=BCDEGIJKLMNOPR 58CO cL T$ DSA in (|a,n|g) 58CO G 253.39 240.9 2 58CO G 312.39 16 58CO cG RI weak |g 58CO G 365.58 12100 3 (M1(+E2)) -0.018 23 1.57E-32 58COB G BM1W=(0.41 +12-23)$BE2W=(2 +5-2) 58COS G KC=0.001415 21$LC=0.0001380 20$MC=1.92E-5 3 58COS G NC=8.55E-7 13 58CO L 373.93 10 5+ 0.8 PS +5-3 M 58COF L FLAG=CE 58COX L XREF=BCFIJKLNR 58CO cL T$DSA in (|a,n|g). Other: >0.69 ps in ({+10}B,p2n|g) (2006Si37) 58CO G 320.76 12 100 M1+E2 -0.050 25 0.002154 58CO cG RI from 1971Ro08 58CO cG M D+Q from |g(|q) in (|a,n|g), M1+E2 from RUL 58COB G BM1W=0.8 +3-5$BE2W=4.E+1 4 58COS G KC=0.00193 3$LC=0.000189 3$MC=2.64E-5 4 58COS G NC=1.169E-6 18 58CO G 349.10 16 6.1 2 (M1) 1.75E-3 58CO cG RI from 1971Ro08 58COB G BM1W=0.037 +14-24 58COS G KC=0.001575 23$LC=0.0001538 22$MC=2.14E-5 3 58COS G NC=9.53E-7 14 58CO L 457.50 8 4+ 0.9 PS 3 I 58COX L XREF=BCGIJKLMNOR 58COF L FLAG=F 58CO cL T$ DSA in (|a,n|g). Other: >0.69 ps in ({+10}B,p2n|g) (2006Si37) 58CO G 91.63 3 1.5 1 58CO G 345.59 12 19.5 8 58CO G 404.20 25 0.8 1 58CO G 432.53 12 100 4 (M1+E2) -0.11 5 1.08E-32 58COB G BM1W=(0.25 9)$BE2W=(3.E+1 3) 58COS G KC=0.000974 21$LC=9.48E-5 21$MC=1.32E-5 3 58COS G NC=5.88E-7 13 58CO L 885.63 10 3+,4+ 0.15 PS +5-3 F 58COX L XREF=BCFIJKLNOR 58CO cL T$ DSA in (|a,n|g) 58CO G 512.0 4 39 8 D 58CO G 519.90 14 46 3 D 58CO G 773.93 12 100 4 58CO G 832.92 31 12 1 58CO G 860.8 5 29 3 58CO L 1040.12 12 3+ 0.14 PS +6-4 58COX L XREF=BCGIJK(*)MOR 58CO cL T$ DSA in (|a,ng) 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=2; (M1(+E2)) |g to 4+ 58CO G 582.87 20 100 5 (M1(+E2)) -0.02 6 5.48E-4 58COB G BM1W=0.37 +11-16$BE2W=1 +5-1 58COS G KC=0.000493 8$LC=4.78E-5 7$MC=6.66E-6 10 58COS G NC=2.98E-7 5 58CO G 674.5 2 51 5 58CO G 1039.80 25 66 9 58CO L 1044.26 10(3+) 1.2 PS GT 58COX L XREF=BCE(*)GK(*)N 58CO cL J$|gs to 2+ and 5+; |g from 1+ 58CO cL T$ DSA in (|a,ng) 58CO G 670.1 5 58CO cG RI weak |g 58CO G 932.5 222 3 58CO G 1044.18 14100 5 58CO L 1050.19 101+ 0.14 PS +6-4 F 58COX L XREF=BDE(*)GIJKLOS 58CO cL T$ DSA in (|a,ng) 58CO G 684.09 205 2 58CO G 938.16 1659 7 58CO G 1049.36 27100 11 58CO L 1075.5 3 6+ 0.069 PS LT J 58COX L XREF=BCFKLNOR 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=6, L(d,t)=3 58CO cL T$from DSAM in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g) 58CO G 702.1 2 15.3 8 D 58CO G 1050.9 1 100 10 D 58CO L 1133 15 58COX L XREF=K 58CO L 1184.63 12 5+ 0.097 PS 14 I 58COX L XREF=BCJKLOR 58COF L FLAG=F 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). Other: 0.15 ps {I+5-3} from DSA in 58COxcL (|a,n|g) 58CO G 727.13 12 100 4 D 58CO G 1131.50 16 30 3 58CO G 1159.3 6 15 2 58CO L 1236.55 132+ 58COX L XREF=BCDGIJH(1290)K(1242)LO 58CO cL J 2+ in (t,{+3}He), L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO G 1124.8 2 34 4 58CO G 1236.52 15 100 5 58CO L 1351.51 16 58COX L XREF=BC(*)J(*) 58CO G 466.19 25 8 2 58CO G 893.88 16 100 3 58CO L 1353.47 13(2)+ 0.6 PS +14-4 58COX L XREF=BC(*)GIJ(*) 58CO cL T from (|a,n|g) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1, |g to 3+ levels is stronger than to 2+ 58CO G 987.90 16 100 14 58CO G 1241.53 20 42 10 58CO G 1353.5 4 35 8 58CO L 1369 4 1+ H 58COX L XREF=D(*)IJ 58CO L 1376.88 11 1+ 0.16 PS +9-6 H 58COX L XREF=BCD(*)EGI(1383)JK(1377) 58CO cL T from (|a,n|g) 58CO G 326.36 16 14 58CO G 332.50 16 89 4 58CO G 1377.97 20 100 9 58COF G FL=0.0 58CO cG RI branching from 1971Xe01 in (|a,n|g). 1971Ro08 in (|a,n|g) 58CO2cG report 25.2 {I17}: 9.2 {I9}: 100 {I3} at 8 MeV and 29 {I6}: 27.8 {I9}: 58COxcG 100 {I3} at 10 MeV 58CO L 1418.12 17(5)+ 58COX L XREF=BCJO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=4 58CO G 1044.18 14 100 58CO L 1424 8 (3+) 58COX L XREF=K 58CO cL J$L(t,{+3}He)=2+4 58CO L 1424.60 17 (6+) 0.076 PS 21 M 58COX L XREF=BR 58CO cL J$ |DJ=1 |g to 5+, band assignment 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g) 58CO G 1050.81 16 100 11 D 58CO G 1399.1 3 11.6 8 D 58CO L 1434.9 3 1+ 0.6 PS +21-3 A 58COX L XREF=BCDEFGIJKS 58CO cL E 1447 {I10} from (t,{+3}He) is discrepant. 58CO cL T from (|a,n|g) 58CO G 1434.91 25 100 M1(+E2) 0.00 8 1.36E-42 58COB G BM1W=(0.012 +7-12) 58COS G KC=7.93E-5 12$LC=7.61E-6 11$MC=1.062E-6 15 58COS G NC=4.78E-8 7$IPC=4.82E-5 7 58CO L 1513.32 13(3+,4,5+) G 58CO cL J |gs to 3+ and 5+ 58COX L XREF=BCO 58CO G 473.27 16 33 5 58CO G 1139.4 5 25 5 58CO G 1147.61 17 100 15 58CO G 1488.2 3 95 18 58CO L 1522.57 22 (2+,3+) G 58COX L XREF=BGIJ(*)K(*)L(*) 58CO G 1157.0 4 79 21 58CO G 1410.75 25 100 21 58CO L 1524.4 4 (2+,3+) G 58COX L XREF=BI(*)J(*)K(*)L(*) 58CO G 1159.3 6 82 14 58CO G 1524.1 4 100 10 58CO L 1548.81 215+ F 58COX L XREF=BCJKO 58CO G 473.27 16 50 8 58CO G 663.17 20 100 8 58CO L 1554.74 14(1+,2,3+) 58COX L XREF=BL(?) 58CO cL J |gs to 1+ and 3+ 58CO G 504.43 12 100 5 58CO G 1189.4 4 58CO G 1555.3 3 39 7 58CO L 1605.62 153+ 58COX L XREF=BCDFGIJK 58CO cL J L(t,{+3}He)=4 or 2+4, L({+3}He,p)=2+(4) 58CO G 1147.61 17 58CO G 1494.66 25 100 11 58CO G 1606.3 4 35 5 58CO L 1669.9 103+ 58COX L XREF=CDGIJK 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=4, |g to 1+ 58CO G 619.9 2 100 58CO L 1729.24 18 1+ 58COX L XREF=BCDEF(*)GIJK(1738)OS 58CO cL J from L(d,|a)=0 where J|p=0+ from non spin flip is expected to 58CO2cL be weak. 58CO G 1356.1 5 21 7 [E4] 3.62E-4 ? 58COS G KC=0.000325 5$LC=3.20E-5 5$MC=4.46E-6 7 58COS G NC=1.96E-7 3 58CO cG E$this transition to 373.9, 5+ level is seen only in (|a,n|g) and 58CO2cG not in (p,|g) or ({+3}He,p|g). Its placement from this level is highly 58CO3cG questionable in view of E4 required. Either the placement is wrong or 58CO3cG it defines another level. Also the existence of another level could 58CO4cG explain the different branching ratios in (|a,n|g) compared to (p,|g) 58COxcG or ({+3}He,p|g) 58CO G 1363.14 20 100 6 58CO G 1730.5 4 13 4 58CO L 1740.5 4 58COX L XREF=BC(*)F(*)GI(*)J 58CO cL J (3+,4+,5+) if the L(d,|a)=(4) corresponds to this level; or 58CO2cL (1+,2+) from L({+3}He,d)=1 and |g to 3+; 58CO G 1628.7 4 100 58CO L 1749.35 19(3,4)+ 58COX L XREF=BC(*)F(*)GH(?)I(*)JM 58CO cL J (3+,4+) if the L(d,|a)=(4) corresponds to this level and |g 58CO2cL to 2+; (2+) from L({+3}He,d)=1 and |g to 4+ 58CO G 863.3 2 100 12 58CO G 1696.9 5 53 6 58CO G 1749.4 5 63 10 58CO L 1757.2 3 (1+,2,3+) 58CO cL J |gs to 1+ and 3+ 58COX L XREF=B 58CO G 707.2 3 69 4 58CO G 1645.2 4 100 15 58CO L 1778 5 3+,4+,5+ 58COX L XREF=CJO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=4 58CO L 1813.3 6 0+ 58COX L XREF=DEIJO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=0 58CO G 1817 58COF G FL=0.0 58CO L 1828 4 58COX L XREF=CJO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(2,4) 58CO cL E weighted average of 1827 {I5} (d,|a) and 1829 {I6} (p,n) 58CO L 1843 4 3+ F 58COX L XREF=CJK 58CO cL E weighted average of 1841 {I6} (p,n), 1843 {I10} (t,{+3}He), 58CO2cL 1844 {I6} (d,|a). 58CO L 1865.8 3 (2+,3,4+) 58COX L XREF=BF(*)I(*)J(*) 58CO cL J |gs to 2+ and 4+ 58CO G 979.9 5 58CO G 1408.1 4 58CO G 1813.3 6 58CO G 1866.0 10 58CO L 1867.7 5 1+ A 58COF L FLAG=F 58COX L XREF=CDEF(*)GI(*)J(*)KS 58CO cL J$L-values in several particle transfer reactions strongly suggest 58CO2cL 1+ assignment for a level near 1867 keV. However, in (p,|g) experiment, 58CO3cL 1975Er07 suggest 2+ based on 1814.9|g placed from this level to 53, 4+ 58CO4cL level. Note that the 1814.9|g was not reported in {+56}Fe({+3}He,p|g) 58CO5cL reaction where the 1867 level was populated 58CO G 820 58COF G FL=1050.19 58CO G 1814.9 3 67 17 [M3] ? 58CO cG $In view of high and unlikely multipolarity of M3 implied for this 58CO2cG transition, evaluators consider this placement, proposed only in 58CO3cG (p,|g), uncertain 58CO G 1867.7 3 100 4 58CO L 1925 6 (1+,2+,3+) 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J$ L(d,|a)=(2) 58CO L 1929.03 21 (7+) 0.277 PS 28 M 58COX L XREF=BR 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (6+), |DJ=(2) |g to 5+; band assignment 58CO cL T$from DSAM in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g) 58CO G 505.13 5 100 3 D 58COF G FL=1424.60 58CO G 1554.7 5 37.1 16 (Q) 58CO L 1978.8 103+ F 58COX L XREF=CDFGIJK 58CO G 934.7 2 100 58CO L 2007 6 2+,3+,4+ 58COX L XREF=CIJKO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3 58CO L 2070 6 4+ 58COX L XREF=CIJKO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3, L(d,|a)=4. J|p=4+,5+ in (t,{+3}He) rules out 58COxcL 3+ 58CO L 2080.5 3 (6+) 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$ |DJ=1 |g to 5+ 58CO G 895.3 2 100 D 58CO L 2105 3 58COX L XREF=GK 58CO L 2166 6 3+ F 58COX L XREF=CIJOK 58CO L 2184.8 8 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 999.6 7 100 58CO L 2225 7 (5+,6+,7+) 58COX L XREF=CO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(6) 58CO L 2248.8 101+ A 58CO2 L FLAG=F 58COX L XREF=CDEFGIJKOS 58CO G 2247.6 5 100 58CO L 2260 7 58COX L XREF=K 58CO L 2314.1 3 (7+) 0.16 PS +6-7 J 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to 6+; band assignment 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 1237.6 1 100 D 58COF G FL=1075.5 58CO L 2335.3 101+,2+,3+ 58COX L XREF=DGJKO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=2 58CO G 2334.9 5 100 58CO L 2415.2 3 (7+) 58COX L XREF=C(*)J(*)R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (6+) 58CO G 990.4 3 100 D 58CO L 2425.5 3 (7+) L 58COX L XREF=C(*)J(*)R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (6+); band assignment 58CO G 1000.7 2 100 D 58CO L 2444 7(1+,2+) 58COX L XREF=CIJK(*) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(1), and L(d,|a)=(2) 58CO L 2456 7 58COX L XREF=CK(*)O 58CO L 2477 7 2+ F 58COX L XREF=IG(?)KO 58CO L 2510 8 58COX L XREF=CK(*) 58CO L 2534.4 101+ A 58COX L XREF=CDGIK(*)O 58CO G 1181.0 2 100 58CO L 2605 8 (3+,4+,5+) 58COX L XREF=CG(?)MO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(4) 58CO L 2625 4 0+,1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=G(?)IO 58CO cL E weighted average of 2624 {I8} ({+3}He,d), and 2625 {I5} (p,n) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 2631 8 3+ 58COX L XREF=CKO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=4, J|p=3+ or 2+ from (t,{+3}He) 58CO L 2640.7 101+ 58COX L XREF=DG(?)JS(2660) 58CO cL J L(p,n)=0 spin-flip transition 58CO G 1590.5 10 ? 58CO L 2646 7(2)+ 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3+(1) 58CO L 2692 8 7+ C 58COX L XREF=CF(*)O(*) 58CO L 2695 8 0+,1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=IKO(*) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 2695.3 3 (6+) K 58COX L XREF=F(*)O(*)R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1|g to 5+, |g to 6+, band assignment 58CO G 1270.3 3 36 4 58CO G 2670.7 3 100 14 D 58CO L 2733 8 (2+) 58COX L XREF=CD(*)IO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(1+3) 58CO L 2733.6 3 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 803.7 1 100 58COF G FL=1929.03 58CO L 2735.55 25 (6+) 0.17 PS 7 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to 5+; |DJ=0, dipole |g to (6+) 58CO G 1550.7 1 17 1 D 58CO cG E$ Level-energy difference=1550.3 58CO G 1659.2 1 100 5 D 58CO G 2361.0 2 52 3 D 58CO G 2710 1 10.5 21 D 58CO L 2741 155+ F 58COX L XREF=D(*)KO 58CO L 2761 8 58COX L XREF=CK(*) 58CO L 2768.5 3 (8+) N 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (7+), band assignment 58CO G 838.6 1 100 D 58COF G FL=1929.03 58CO L 2781 8 (1)+ 58COX L XREF=CH(2770)IK(*) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1, L(d,|a)=(0+2) 58CO L 2792 8 (1+) 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(0+2) 58CO L 2819 8 3+,4+,5+ 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=4 58CO L 2837 9 58COX L XREF=CD(*)F(*) 58CO L 2844 9 3-,4-,5- 58COX L XREF=D(*)F(*)I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=4 58CO L 2849 9 3+,4+,5+ 58COX L XREF=CD(*)F(*)K(*)O 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=4 58CO L 2865 9 (1+) 58COX L XREF=CK(*)S 58CO cL J$L(d,{+2}He)=0(+1) 58CO L 2884 9 0+,1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=CIKO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 2907 9 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 2931 9 7+ C 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 2946 9 2+,3+ 58COX L XREF=CIKO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3, and L(d,|a)=2 58CO L 2987 9 1+,2+,3+ 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L=2 in (d,|a) 58CO L 2995 9 (0-,1-) 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(0) 58CO L 3010 4 2+ F 58COX L XREF=CGIKO 58CO cL E weighted average of 3007 {I9} (d,|a) and 3011 {I5} (p,|g) 58CO L 3044 9 58COX L XREF=CO 58CO L 3062 9 2+,3+,4+ 58COX L XREF=IC 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3 58CO L 3068.57 25 (7+) 0.076 PS +7-28 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (6+) 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 333.06 4 100 5 D 58CO G 1644.2 6 7.2 9 58COF G FL=1424.60 58CO G 1991.9 1 98 5 D 58COF G FL=1075.5 58CO L 3072 9 5+ F 58COX L XREF=CKO 58CO L 3096 9 58COX L XREF=CDFIKO 58CO cL E most probably a triplet according to 1972Sc13: 58CO2cL with levels at 3090 {I9}, L=(1,2) (d,|a); 3096 {I9}, L=1 ({+3}He,d); 58CO3cL 3100 {I10}, L=2 ({+3}He,p); 3100 {I15}, J|p=2+,3+ (t,{+3}He) 58CO L 3118 9 (1)+ 58COX L XREF=CG(?)O(*)S 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=0; (3+,4+,5+) if L(d,|a)=(4) 58CO L 3123 9 2+ 58COX L XREF=IO(*) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+3 58CO L 3146 9 (1+,2+,3+) 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(2) 58COX L XREF=CKO(*) 58CO L 3169 10 58COX L XREF=CO(*) 58CO L 3184 101+ 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=0 58CO L 3186 102+,3+,4+ 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3 58CO L 3199 9 0-,1- 58COX L XREF=CI 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=0, L(d,|a)=(1) 58CO L 3214 103+ F 58COX L XREF=CKO 58CO L 3226 10(2)+ 58COX L XREF=IK(*) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+(3) 58CO L 3232 10(0-,1-,2-) 58COX L XREF=CK(*) 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(1) 58CO L 3243 9 58COX L XREF=CIK(*)O 58CO L 3261 9 (2)+ 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+(3) 58CO L 3281.1 4 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 512.6 2 100 58COF G FL=2768.5 58CO L 3284 4 1+ A 58COX L XREF=CDEJKO 58CO G 1416 58COF G FL=1867.7 58CO G 2918 58CO G 3284 58CO L 3337 101+,2+ 58COX L XREF=CDFIK 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+(3); L(d,|a)=2 58CO L 3376 10 2+ 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+3 58CO L 3394.7 4 (8+) 0.07 PS 4 M 58COX L XREF=CR 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (7+), band assignment 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 1464.8 2 100 D 58CO L 3403 154+,5+ F 58COX L XREF=FKO 58CO L 3410 10(0-,1-,2-) 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(1) 58CO L 3414 10(2)+ 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+(3) 58CO L 3427 5 3+ F 58COX L XREF=CDGKO 58CO L 3442 10 (1)+ 58COX L XREF=IS 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 3455 102+,3+,4+ 58COX L XREF=CI 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3 58CO L 3470 10 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3484 203+,4+,5+ 58COX L XREF=CKO 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=4 58CO L 3507 10(2-,3-,4-) 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(3) 58CO L 3512 5 (1)+ 58COX L XREF=CGIS 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 3518 20(3+,4+,5+) 58COX L XREF=K 58CO cL J L(t,{+3}He)=(4) 58CO L 3526 10(2+) 58COX L XREF=IO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(1+3) 58CO L 3533.8 4 (9+) N 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (8+), band assignment 58CO G 765.3 2 100 D 58COF G FL=2768.5 58CO L 3548 10 1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=CDIKO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1; L({+3}He,p)=2 58CO L 3559 10(0-,1-) 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(0) 58CO L 3574 11 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3604 11(3+,4+,5+) 58COX L XREF=C 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(4) 58CO L 3607 11(2+) 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(1+3) 58CO L 3616 7 1+ 58COX L XREF=DIKS 58CO cL E weighted average of 3613 {I10} ({+3}He,p) and 3619 {I11} 58COxcL ({+3}He,d) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=0+2 58CO L 3639 4 58COX L XREF=CDEIO 58CO cL J 1+ from L({+3}He,p)=0+2 is not consistent with J|p=(2-,3-,4-) 58CO2cL from L(d,|a)=(3); |gs to 1+ disfavor J|p=3-,4- 58CO G 2205 58COF G FL=1434.9 58CO G 2261 58COF G FL=1376.88 58CO G 2591 58COF G FL=1050.19 58CO L 3659 11 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3669 10 1+ 58COX L XREF=DIK 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=0+2 58CO cL E weighted average of 3668 {I11} ({+3}He,d), 3668 {I20} 58CO2cL (t,{+3}He), 3670 {I10} ({+3}He,p) 58CO L 3685 110+,1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=IO(*) 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 3689 11(2-,3-,4-) 58COX L XREF=CO(*) 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(3) 58CO L 3720 20(3+) F 58COX L XREF=K 58CO L 3720.5 4 J 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 1406.2 5 100 11 58CO G 1790.7 4 61 6 58CO L 3725 11(2)+ 58COX L XREF=I 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=3+(1) 58CO L 3736 11(0-,1-,2-) 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(1) 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3750 30(8)- D 58COX L XREF=F 58CO L 3759 11 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3775 11 0+,1+,2+ 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58COX L XREF=D(*)IK(*)O(*) 58CO L 3776.10 15 (8+) 0.076 PS 7 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (7+) 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 707.53 5 100 4 D 58COF G FL=3068.57 58CO G 1460.5 3 11.3 8 D 58COF G FL=2314.1 58CO L 3779 11(0-,1-,2-) 58COX L XREF=CD(*)K(*)O(*) 58CO cL J L(d,|a)=(1) 58CO L 3790 11(1-,0-) 58COX L XREF=D(*)IO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(0) 58CO L 3802.4 4 (8+) L 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$ |DJ=1 |g to (7+) 58CO G 1376.9 2 100 D 58CO L 3804 20 7+ C 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3806 11 1-,2-,3- 58COX L XREF=CIK 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=2 58CO L 3833 11 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 3853 11 0+,1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=CI 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 3865.8 4 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 332.0 2 100 58CO L 3869 110+,1+,2+ 58COX L XREF=CI 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58CO L 3890 20(2+) F 58COX L XREF=K 58CO L 3898 11 1-,0- 58COX L XREF=CIO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=0 58CO L 3916 11 1-,2-,3- 58COX L XREF=CD(*)IO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=2 58CO L 3925 20 (1+) F 58COX L XREF=D(*)FK(*)OS 58CO L 3943 11 0+,1+,2+ 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58COX L XREF=CD(*)IK(*)O 58CO L 3957 11(2)+ 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+(3) 58COX L XREF=CDIK 58CO L 4006 12 0+,1+,2+ 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1 58COX L XREF=CDI 58CO L 4021 20(3+) F 58COX L XREF=K 58CO L 4030 25 (1+) 58COX L XREF=S 58CO cL J$L(d,{+2}H)=0 58CO L 4049 10 2+ F 58COX L XREF=DK 58CO L 4082 12(2)+ 58COX L XREF=CI 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=1+(3) 58CO L 4087 20(4+) F 58COX L XREF=K 58CO L 4097 12 58COX L XREF=CIO 58CO cL E,L possibly doublet with L=(4) and (1) in ({+3}He,d) 58CO L 4107 10(1+) 58COX L XREF=D 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=(0+2) 58CO L 4110 12(3+) 58COX L XREF=CIK 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(2+4) 58CO L 4127 58COX L XREF=O 58CO L 4175 10 58COX L XREF=DKO 58CO L 4206 20 58COX L XREF=KO 58CO L 4239.9 6 N 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 706.1 5 100 58CO L 4253 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 4287 20 58COX L XREF=K 58CO cL E unresolved group in (t,{+3}He) 58CO L 4295.1 4 (7+) K 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (6+) 58CO G 1599.8 1 100 D 58COF G FL=2695.3 58CO L 4325 10 3+,4+,5+ 58COX L XREF=DFO 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=4 58CO L 4336.0 5 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 533.6 3 100 58CO L 4400 13 58COX L XREF=O 58CO L 4448 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 4480.1 3 (9+) 0.076 PS 7 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (8+) 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 704.0 1 100 D 58CO L 4555 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 4568.7 7 J 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 848.2 5 100 58COF G FL=3720.5 58CO L 4650 (5)+ D 58COX L XREF=F 58CO L 4708 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 4775.0 7 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 1241.2 6 100 58CO L 4790 30 7+ C 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 4849 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5040 30 5+ C 58COX L XREF=C 58CO L 5057 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5058.5 3 (10+) 0.094 PS 10 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (9+) 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 578.35 4 100 D 58CO L 5097.4 4 (8+) K 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (7+) 58CO G 802.3 1 100 D 58CO L 5183 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5306 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5392 101+ A 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5454 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5493 20 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5502.2 5 (9+) L 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (8+) 58CO G 1699.8 3 100 D 58CO L 5531 10 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5651 10 1+ B 58COX L XREF=DM 58CO cL J L({+3}He,p)=0+2 58CO L 5685.6 4 58COX L XREF=EMR 58CO G 627.1 2 100 58CO L 5738 8 0+ B 58COX L XREF=D(*)EMQ 58CO cL J$ IAS of {+58}Fe g.s. 58CO G 4008 58COF G FL=1729.24 58CO G 4690 58COF G FL=1050.19 58CO L 5756 8 0+ B 58COX L XREF=D(*)EJMQ 58CO cL J$ IAS of {+58}Fe g.s. 58CO G 4026 58COF G FL=1729.24 58CO L 5852 20 58COX L XREF=DM 58CO L 5888 20 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5948 20 58COX L XREF=D 58CO L 5956.1 6 (10+) 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (9+) 58CO G 2422.2 4 100 D 58CO L 6002.4 3 (11+) 0.062 PS 6 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (10+) 58CO cL T$from DSA in {+51}V({+10}B,p2n|g). 58CO G 943.95 7 100 D 58CO L 6140 19(1-,0-) 58COX L XREF=CI 58CO cL J L({+3}He,d)=(0) 58CO L 6400 30(1)+ D 58COX L XREF=F 58CO L 6427.0 4 (9+) K 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (8+) 58CO G 1329.6 2 100 D 58CO L 6511.4 5 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 509.0 4 100 58CO L 6671.5 6 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 985.9 4 100 58CO L 6790 30(9)+ D 58COX L XREF=F 58CO L 7024.6 6 P 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 513.2 3 100 58CO L 7685.4 11 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 3349.3 9 100 58COF G FL=4336.0 58CO L 7691.7 9 L 58COX L XREF=R 58CO G 2189.4 7 100 58CO L 8044.1 8 (10+) K 58COX L XREF=R 58CO cL J$|DJ=1 |g to (9+) 58CO G 1617.1 7 100 D 58CO L 8125.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8127.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8138.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8144.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8148.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8159.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8161.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8164.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8168.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8172.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8175.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8182.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8190.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8196.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8199.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8203.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8208.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8210.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8214.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8217.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8218.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8227.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8229.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8232.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8241.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8244.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8248.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8253.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8256.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8263.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8265.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8272.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8274.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8278.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8283.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8289.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8295.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8299.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8309.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8312.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8315.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8319.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8327.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8335.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8336.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8343.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8348.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8352.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8354.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8362.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8366.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8371.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8376.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8378.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8387.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8389.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8395.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 4881 3 4 1 58COF G FL=3512 58CO G 4965 3 50 4 58COF G FL=3427 58CO G 5285 3 100 7 58COF G FL=3118 58CO G 5381 3 11 2 58CO G 5914 3 7 2 ? 58CO G 6048 3 21 4 ? 58COF G FL=2335.3 58CO G 6663 3 29 4 58CO G 6868 3 36 4 58COF G FL=1522.57 58CO G 6956 3 7 2 58CO G 7014 4 18 4 58CO G 7039 4 21 4 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7155 3 18 4 58CO G 7347 3 21 4 58COF G FL=1050.19 58CO G 8395 3 18 4 58CO L 8397.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8405.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8409.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8413.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8415.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8418.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8420.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8422.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8427.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8429.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8431.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8434.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8437.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8440.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8445.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8449.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8451.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8456.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8459.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8464.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8469.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8473.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8476.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8478.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8483.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8484.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 5835 3 6 2 58CO G 5851 3 9 2 58COF G FL=2625 58CO G 5867 3 6 2 ? 58COF G FL=2605 58CO G 6740 3 29 3 ? 58COF G FL=1740.5 58CO G 6955 3 9 2 58CO G 7105 3 38 3 58CO G 7130 4 9 3 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7249 4 15 3 58CO G 7432 3 68 6 58CO G 8482 3 100 6 58CO L 8486.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8487.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8490.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8495.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8500.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8501.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8506.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8509.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 5872 3 4 LT 58COF G FL=2640.7 58CO G 5890 3 4 LT 58COF G FL=2625 58CO G 5979 3 4 LT 58CO G 6407 3 4 LT 58CO G 6530 3 4 LT 58CO G 6987 2 36 4 58COF G FL=1522.57 58CO G 7076 2 13 2 58COF G FL=1434.9 58CO G 7138 3 4 LT 58COF G FL=1376.88 58CO G 7157 2 100 7 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7273 2 13 2 58CO G 7461 2 24 2 58COF G FL=1050.19 58CO G 8145 3 7 2 58CO G 8400 3 11 2 58CO G 8459 3 9 2 58CO G 8485 7 2 58CO G 8512 3 4 1 58CO L 8515.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8520.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8528.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 6778 38 3 58CO G 7176 100 7 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7292 21 3 58CO G 7485 72 6 58COF G FL=1044.26 58CO G 8418 17 3 58CO G 8476 17 3 58CO G 8529 83 7 58CO L 8537.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 6808 52 4 58CO G 6868 36 4 58CO G 6931 36 4 58CO G 7102 64 4 58COF G FL=1434.9 58CO G 7162 28 4 58COF G FL=1376.88 58CO G 7301 8 2 58CO G 7494 52 4 58COF G FL=1044.26 58CO G 8427 28 4 58CO G 8538 100 5 58CO L 8541.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8549.1 23 Y 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8552.0 23 Y 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 6300 3 29 3 58COF G FL=2248.8 58CO G 6824 2 100 6 58CO G 7120 3 23 3 58COF G FL=1434.9 58CO G 7319 3 29 3 58CO G 7502 3 100 6 58COF G FL=1050.19 58CO G 7508 16 LT ? 58COF G FL=1044.26 58CO G 8190 4 13 3 58CO G 8443 4 6.3 15 58CO G 8553 3 19 3 58CO L 8558.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8565.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8573.7 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8582.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8588.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8599.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 6732 25 3 58COF G FL=1867.7 58CO G 7077 6 LT 58COF G FL=1522.57 58CO G 7164 6 LT 58COF G FL=1434.9 58CO G 7226 44 3 58CO G 7247 47 3 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7363 6 LT 58CO G 7556 97 6 58COF G FL=1044.26 58CO G 8600 100 6 58CO L 8605.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8610.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 6275 41 5 58CO G 6361 18 5 58CO G 6505 41 5 58CO G 6631 18 5 58CO G 6742 52 5 58COF G FL=1867.7 58CO G 6859 9 LT 58CO G 6880 9 LT 58CO G 7087 9 LT 58COF G FL=1522.57 58CO G 7175 55 5 58COF G FL=1434.9 58CO G 7234 100 5 58COF G FL=1376.88 58CO G 7257 41 5 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7373 9 LT 58CO G 7566 82 5 58COF G FL=1044.26 58CO G 8610 68 5 58CO L 8616.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8624.8 23 Y 58COX L XREF=G 58CO G 6757 42 3 58COF G FL=1867.7 58CO G 6875 100 5 58CO G 6895 5 LT 58CO G 6955 61 5 58CO G 7189 5 LT 58CO G 7272 5 LT 58COF G FL=1353.47 58CO G 7388 5 LT 58CO G 7581 58 3 58COF G FL=1044.26 58CO G 8625 55 3 58CO L 8627.7 23 Y 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8635.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8643.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8650.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8653.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8668.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8672.9 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8677.8 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8687.6 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8694.5 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8699.4 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8706.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8709.3 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8715.2 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8721.1 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO L 8725.0 23 58COX L XREF=G 58CO 58CO IT DECAY (9.10 H) 1971PL02,1970CA19 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO P 24.889 215+ 9.10 H 9 58CO c 1971Pl02: {+58}Co produced in reaction {+58}Ni(|n,|p). Measured G, ce. 58CO c 1970Ca19: {+58}Co produced in reaction {+59}Co(|g,|n). Measured G, ce. 58CO2c Used University of Toronto linear electron accelerator. 58CO c 1968Wi10: Measured |g, ce 58CO c 1967St23: Measured |g, ce 58CO c 1950St22: Co produced by using Mn and a 40 MeV a particle beam. 58CO2c Measured |g, ce, did not observe |b{++}. 58CO cL J,T$From Adopted Levels 58CO N 1.0 1.0 1.0 58CO PN 3 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 58CO L 24.889 21 5+ 9.10 H 9 M1 58CO cL T$weighted average of 9.15 h {I10} (1967St23) and 8.94 h {I17} 58CO2cL (1970Ca19). Others: 9.0 h {I2} (1960Pr05,1952Av17), 9.2 h {I2} 58COxcL (1952Ho58,1950Ch62). Same value in Adopted Levels 58CO G 24.889 210.0397 6 M3 2.52E3 4 100 58COS G KC= 1840 $LC= 592$ MC=84.5 $ NC+=2.1 58CO cG RI from I(|g+ce) and |a 58CO cG M L1/(L2+L3)=1.070 {I15}, M1/(M2+M3)=1.19 {I6}, L/M=6.62 {I13}, 58CO2cG N1/M1=0.034 {I10} (1971Pl02); K/LM+=2.25 {I15} (1968Wi10), 58CO3cG 2.0 {I+11-6} (1967St23), 1.9 {I2} (1950St22); |a(K)exp=1860 {I100} 58CO3cG (based on average K| x ray/I(25|g)=722 {I26} (680 {I88} (1968Wi10), 58CO4cG 710 {I50} (1967St23), 733 {I33} (1970Ca19)) and fluorescence yield 58COxcG 0.389 {I14}) 58CO cG $|d(E4/M3)<0.014 from |d{+2}<2|*10{+-4} (1971Pl02); <0.009 58CO2cG from |d{+2}=2.7|*10{+-5} {I55} (deduced in 2006Ra03 evaluation from 58CO3cG measured subshell ratios listed above) 58CO cG E from 1971Pl02. Others: 24.87 {I4} (1970Ca19), 58CO2cG 1954Ca18, 1950St22. See also 1967St23 58CO 51V(10B,P2NG) 2006SI37 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 2006Si37 (also 2005Si28,2005Si37): E=33, 36 MeV. Measured E|g, I|g, 58CO2c lifetimes, |g|g, p|g coin using the 58CO2c Saci-Perere |g-ray spectrometer consisting of a 4|p-charged particle 58CO3c array of 11 plastic phoswich scintillator |DE-E telescopes, and four 58CO4c Compton suppressed HPGe detectors (two placed at 37|' and two at 101|' 58CO5c with respect to the beam axis). Lifetimes measured using Doppler-shift 58CO6c attenuation method (DSAM) and line-shape analysis which included 58CO8c the recoil spread due to particle emission. 58CO cG E(X)$ Ordering of the 802-1600 cascade is from the level scheme 58CO2cG figure 1 of 2006Si37. It is listed as reversed in authors' table I. 58CO3cG The ordering given in the level scheme figure seems preferred from 58CO4cG the relative intensities of the two |g rays. 58CO cG $ DCO=I{-|g}(|g{-1} at 37|'; gated with |g{-2} at 101|')/ 58CO2cG I{-|g}(|g{-1} at 101|'; gated with |g{-2} at 37|'); expected 58CO3cG R{-DCO}=1.0 and 0.49 for |DJ=2 and |DJ=1 transitions, respectively, 58CO4cG with intermediate values for moderately mixed M1+E2 58CO5cG transitions. |DJ=0 transitions could give values between 1.1 (pure 58CO6cG dipole) and 0.44 (large mixing ratios). The gating transitions 58CO7cG are |DJ=2, quadrupole type, unless otherwise stated. For reference, 58CO8cG DCO=0.458 for 321.37|g and 0.41 for 433.15|g are used. 58CO cG M$ From DCO ratios; dipole character is implied from |DJ=1 58CO2cG transition. Small quadrupole admixture is also possible 58CO cL E$ From least-squares fit to E|g data. Using the uncertainties given 58CO2cL 2006Si37, normalized |h{+2}=6.8 is much larger than the critical value 58CO3cL of 2.0. The evaluators have increased the uncertainties of the 58CO4cL following |g rays as follows to obtain an acceptable fit: 0.14 keV for 58CO5cL 727.63|g, 0.3 keV for 1050.9|g, 0.2 keV for 1550.7|g and 0.6 keV 58CO6cL for 1460.5|g 58CO cL J$As proposed by 2006Si37 based on |g|g(|q)(DCO) measurements and 58CO2cL band associations. In Adopted Levels dataset, the assignments are 58CO3cL the same, except that parentheses have been added when strong arguments 58CO4cL are lacking 58CO cL T$From Doppler-shift attenuation method (2006Si37), unless otherwise 58CO2cL stated 58CO cL T(X)$From Adopted Levels 58CO CL BAND(A)$ GS Band. 58CO CL BAND(B)$ |g cascade based on 6+. 58CO CL BAND(C)$ |g cascade based on 5+. 58CO CL BAND(D)$ |g cascade based on 7+. 58CO CL BAND(E)$ Band based on 4+. 58CO CL BAND(F)$ |g cascade based on (8)+ 58CO CL BAND(G)$ Band based on 6+ 58CO PN 5 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 A 58COF L FLAG=X 58CO L 24.66 22 5+ 9.10 H 9 CM1 58CO2 L %IT=100 58COF L FLAG=X 58CO L 53.04 23 4+ 10.5 US 3 EM2 58CO2 L %IT=100 58COF L FLAG=X 58CO L 111.92 10 3+ A 58CO G 111.9 1 5 GT 58CO L 366.30 24 3+ 58CO G 366.5 3 3 GT 58CO L 374.41 23 5+ 0.69 PS GT E 58CO G 321.37 4 180 GT 58CO G 349.70 14 1.01 6 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.59 18 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 1050|g 58CO L 457.78 21 4+ 0.69 PS GT A 58CO G 345.9 2 2.1 2 58CO cG $ Final level energy=24.8 in table I of 2006Si37 is a misprint, it 58CO2cG should be 111.9 level 58CO G 433.15 6 20 2 58CO L 886.34 23 (4)+ 58CO cL J$3+,4+ in Adopted Levels 58CO G 512.0 4 2.1 4 58CO G 520.3 3 2.5 3 58CO G 774.1 3 2.6 3 58CO cG $ Initial level energy=866 in table I of 2006Si37 is a misprint, 58CO2cG it should be 886 level 58CO L 1042.0 7 3+ 58CO G 584.6 8 1.5 4 58CO G 675 1 0.6 3 58CO L 1076.46 25 6+ 0.069 PS LT B 58CO G 702.1 2 20 1 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.52 6 58CO cG E$ 702.1|g+704.0|g form a doublet structure. 58CO cG $ DCO for 702+704 doublet for gate on |DJ=1, 578|g 58CO G 1050.9 1 131 13 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.31 6 58COF G FL=24.66 58CO cG E$ Level-energy difference=1051.4 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=0, 1659|g 58CO L 1185.20 24 5+ 0.097 PS 14 A 58CO G 727.63 7 27 1 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.38 3 58CO cG E$ Level-energy difference=727.4 58CO G 1131.9 4 7.3 8 58CO G 1161 1 2.5 7 58CO L 1424.78 24 6+ 0.076 PS 21 E 58CO G 1050.37 5 100 4 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.47 3 58CO G 1402 2 2.7 11 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.59 11 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 505|g 58CO L 1929.91 24 7+ 0.277 PS 28 E 58CO G 505.13 5 62 2 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.44 3 58CO G 1554.7 5 23 1 (Q) 58CO2 G DCO=0.75 8 58CO L 2080.5 3 (6)+ 58CO G 895.3 2 11.5 8 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.34 5 58CO L 2184.8 8 58CO G 999.6 7 2.9 6 58CO L 2314.1 3 7+ 0.16 PS +6-7 B 58CO G 1237.6 1 48 3 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.46 9 58CO L 2415.2 4 (7)+ 58CO G 990.4 3 9.1 7 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.38 6 58CO L 2425.5 3 7+ D 58CO G 1000.7 2 7.7 7 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.32 8 58CO L 2695.3 3 6+ C 58CO G 1270.3 3 7.6 8 58CO G 2670.7 3 21 3 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.37 8 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 1600|g 58CO L 2733.6 3 58CO G 803.7 1 4.1 5 58CO L 2735.55 25 6+ 0.17 PS 7 G 58CO G 1550.7 1 17 1 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.47 5 58CO cG E$ Level-energy difference=1550.3 58CO G 1659.2 1 19 1 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.39 6 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 1051|g 58CO G 2361.0 2 9.9 6 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.52 7 58CO G 2710 1 2.0 4 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.45 10 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 333|g 58CO L 2768.5 3 (8)+ F 58CO G 838.6 1 11.5 6 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.36 4 58CO L 3068.57 25 7+ 0.076 PS +7-28 G 58CO G 333.06 4 43 2 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.40 9 58CO G 1644.2 6 3.1 4 58CO G 1991.9 1 42 2 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.52 9 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 578|g 58CO L 3281.1 4 58CO G 512.6 2 4.7 4 58CO L 3394.7 4 8+ 0.07 PS 4 E 58CO G 1464.8 2 15.8 8 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.59 8 58CO L 3533.8 4 (9)+ F 58CO G 765.3 2 5.0 4 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.45 5 58CO L 3720.5 4 B 58CO G 1406.2 5 8.4 9 58CO G 1790.7 4 5.1 5 58CO L 3776.10 25 8+ 0.076 PS 7 G 58CO G 707.53 5 80 3 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.50 5 58CO G 1460.5 3 9.0 6 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.39 5 58COF G FL=2314.1 58CO cG E$ Level-energy difference=1461.9 58CO L 3802.4 4 8+ D 58CO G 1376.9 2 12.3 8 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.64 9 58CO L 3865.8 4 58CO G 332.0 2 2.6 3 58CO L 4239.9 6 F 58CO G 706.1 5 2.7 5 58CO L 4295.1 4 7+ C 58CO cL E$ based on the ordering of the 802-1600 cascade from the 5097 level as 58CO2cL shown in figure 1 of 2006Si37. In authors' table I, the ordering is 58CO3cL given as reversed which gives energy of the intermediate level at 58CO4cL 3498 keV 58CO G 1599.8 1 29 1 D X 58CO2 G DCO=0.38 7 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 802|g 58CO L 4336.0 5 58CO G 533.6 3 2.7 3 58CO L 4480.1 3 9+ 0.076 PS 7 G 58CO G 704.0 1 74 3 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.52 6 58CO cG E$ 702.1|g+704.0|g form a doublet structure. 58CO cG $ DCO for 702.1|g+704.0|g for gate on |DJ=1, 578|g 58CO L 4568.7 7 B 58CO G 848.2 5 4.1 6 58CO L 4775.0 7 58CO G 1241.2 6 2.6 4 58CO L 5058.5 3 10+ 0.094 PS 10 G 58CO G 578.35 4 54 2 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.57 6 58CO L 5097.4 4 8+ C 58CO G 802.3 1 22 2 D X 58CO2 G DCO=0.54 7 58CO L 5502.2 5 (9)+ D 58CO G 1699.8 3 6.7 6 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.25 13 58CO L 5685.6 4 58CO G 627.1 2 3.7 3 58CO L 5956.1 6 (10)+ 58CO G 2422.2 4 4.4 4 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.68 13 58CO L 6002.4 3 11+ 0.062 PS 6 G 58CO G 943.95 7 27 1 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.30 5 58CO L 6427.0 4 9+ C 58CO G 1329.6 2 10.9 8 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.38 8 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 1600|g 58CO L 6511.4 5 G 58CO G 509.0 4 2.1 3 58CO L 6671.5 6 58CO G 985.9 4 3.3 3 58CO L 7024.6 6 G 58CO G 513.2 3 3.0 3 58CO L 7685.4 11 58CO G 3349.3 9 2.1 3 58CO L 7691.7 9 D 58CO G 2189.4 7 2.7 4 58CO L 8044.1 8 10+ C 58CO G 1617.1 7 3.0 5 D 58CO2 G DCO=0.54 12 58CO cG $ DCO for gate on |DJ=1, 1600|g 58CO 55MN(A,NG) 1971RO08,1971XE01,1975BR05ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1971Ro08: E=5-10 MeV. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |g(|t). 58CO c 1971Xe01: E=7.5-12.5 MeV from Washington University 58CO c cyclotron. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g. 58CO c 1975Br05: E=9.5 MeV beam from Ohio State Van de Graaff 58CO c accelerator. Measured lifetimes by DSAM. 58CO c 1972Ge14: E=10 MeV. Measured |g(|q), lifetimes by DSAM 58CO c The level scheme is that proposed by 1971Xe01; however, some |g 58CO2c placements proposed by 1971Ro08, but not adopted by 1971Xe01, are 58CO3c retained by the evaluators and are noted. 58CO cG RI Relative I|g at E|a=11.7 MeV (1971Xe01), unless indicated 58CO2cG otherwise 58CO cG M,MR From |g(|q) (1972Ge14) 58CO cG E From 1971Ro08, unless indicated otherwise 58CO cG E(B) From 1971Xe01 58CO cG E(C) Unplaced by 1971Ro08; placement based on 1971Xe01 58CO cG E(G) Gives a poor fit to level energy 58CO cG RI(H)$1971Xe01 report I|g=14.8 {I7} for a doubly-placed 1044|g. 58CO2cG Intensity divided by using branching ratios in (p,|g) dataset 58CO cG RI(K)$From branching in 1971Ro08 58CO cL E From a least-squares fit to the E|g data with the 24.89 level 58CO2cL held fixed. 58CO cL E(E) Level not reported by 1971Xe01 58CO cL J$From Adopted Levels 58CO cL T$From DSAM (1975Br05 and/or 1972Ge14) 58CO PN 5 58CO G 307.6 3 58CO G 377.09 16 58CO G 523.63 26 58CO G 616.70 203.4 4 58CO G 623.01 20 58CO G 629.2 41.5 2 B 58CO G 699.4 8 58CO G 748.1 31.5 4 58CO G 870.78 20 58CO G 926.4 3 58CO G 1392.2 7 58CO G 1414.9 8 58CO G 1419.20 25 58CO G 1551.9 45.4 8 B 58CO G 1562.8 61.1 5 B 58CO G 1614.4 62.3 B 58CO G 1792.1 58.2 10 B 58CO G 1807.7 43.0 7 B 58CO G 1960.2 82.2 4 B 58CO G 2050.4 123.0 9 B 58CO G 2058.1 112.9 9 B 58CO G 2109.4 72.6 6 B 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 58CO cL T$from Adopted Levels 58CO L 24.89 5+ 9.10 H 9 M1 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO cL T$from Adopted Levels 58CO G 24.89 M3 58CO cG E,M$from Adopted Gammas 58CO L 53.12 7 4+ 11.4 US 6 M2 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO cL T from 1971Ro08 58CO G 28.30 15 58CO G 52.96 13 58CO cG RI I(53|g)/I(28|g)=2.5 {I2} (branching=100 {I4} and 40 {I4}) 58COxcG (1971Ro08) 58CO L 111.73 7 3+ 0.12 NS 2 58CO cL T from 1972Ge14 58CO cL J J=3 from |g(|q) and RUL (1975Br05) 58CO G 58.49 1267 8 58CO cG RI 59 {I7} (1971Ro08) 58CO G 111.52 1563 2 58CO cG RI 102 {I2} (1971Ro08) 58CO L 365.64 7 3+ 1.1 PS +6-3 58CO cL T$weighted average of 1.2 ps +7-4 (1975Br05) and 1.0 ps {I+8-4} 58COxcL (1972Ge14) 58CO cL J J=3 from |g(|q) and RUL (1975Br05) 58CO G 253.39 240.6 1 58CO G 312.39 160.77 7 58CO cG RI from I|g(312)/I|g(366) (1971Ro08) and I|g(366) 58CO G 365.58 1265 2D+(Q) -0.018 23 58CO cG M A{-2}=-0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} 58CO L 373.89 105+ 0.8 PS +5-3 58CO cL T$weighted average of 1.5 ps +9-5 (1975Br05) and 58CO2cL 0.62 ps {I+51-24} (1972Ge14) 58CO cL J J=3 or 5 from RUL and |g(|q) (1975Br05) 58CO G 320.76 1299 3D+Q -0.050 25 58CO cG M A{-2}=-0.20 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.00 {I8} 58CO G 349.10 163.4 58CO L 457.46 8 4+ 0.9 PS 3 58CO cL T$weighted average of 0.87 ps +31-26 (1975Br05) and 58CO2cL 0.8 ps {I+6-3} (1972Ge14) 58CO cL J J=5 is ruled out by |g(|q) of 1975Br05 58CO G 91.63 271.1 1 58CO G 345.59 1214.2 6 58CO G 404.20 250.6 1 58CO G 432.53 1273 3D+Q -0.11 5 58CO cG M A{-2}=+0.33 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I12} 58CO L 885.60 103+,4+ 0.15 PS +5-3 58CO cL T$weighted average of 0.17 ps +8-5 (1975Br05) and 58CO2cL 0.14 ps {I+6-3} (1972Ge14) 58CO G 510.8 4 58CO G 519.90 1410.5 6 58CO G 773.93 1222.7 8 58CO G 832.9 3 2.7 3 58CO G 860.8 56.5 6 58CO L 1040.09 123+ 0.14 PS +6-4 58CO cL J J=3 or 5 from |g(|q) (1975Br05) 58CO cL T from 1972Ge14 58CO G 582.87 207.7 4 58CO G 674.50 203.9 4 58CO G 1039.80 255.1 7 58CO L 1044.28 11(3+) 1.2 PS GT 58CO cL T from 1972Ge14 58CO G 670.1 5 B 58CO cG RI weak |g 58CO G 932.50 203.2 5 58CO G 1044.18 1414 3 @ 58COF G FLAG=H 58CO L 1050.12 101+ 0.14 PS +6-3 58CO cL T from 1972Ge14 58CO G 684.09 200.8 3 58CO G 938.16 168.9 10 58CO G 1049.4 315.1 17 K 58CO L 1075.52 256+ 58CO G 701.7 611.6 6 58CO L 1184.60 115+ 0.15 PS +5-3 58CO cL T$weighted average of 0.17 ps +8-5 (1975Br05) and 58CO2cL 0.14 ps {I+6-3} (1972Ge14) 58CO G 727.13 1228.5 10 58CO G 1131.50 168.6 9 58CO G 1159.3 64.2 7 & 58CO L 1236.54 132+ 58CO G 1124.80 206.5 7 58CO G 1236.52 1519.3 10 58CO L 1351.48 15 58CO G 466.19 251.4 1 C 58CO G 893.88 1617.7 6 C 58CO L 1353.45 13(2)+ 0.6 PS +14-4 58CO cL T from 1975Br05 58CO G 987.90 167.1 10 58CO G 1241.53 203.0 7 58CO G 1353.5 42.5 6 58CO L 1376.96 121+ 0.16 PS +9-6 58CO cL T from 1975Br05 58CO G 326.36 16 0.8 C 58CO G 332.50 165.0 2 C 58CO G 1377.97 205.6 5 G 58COF G FL=0.0 58CO L 1418.08 17(5)+ 58CO G 1044.18 143.8 LT @ 58COF G FLAG=H 58CO L 1424.56 16(6+) E 58CO G 1050.81 1675 8 K 58CO G 1399.1 38.7 6 58CO L 1434.93 251+ 0.6 PS +21-4 58CO cL T from 1975Br05 58CO cL J J=4 ruled out in (|g,|q) (1975Br05) 58CO G 1434.91 256.4 5 58CO L 1513.28 12(3+,4,5+) E 58CO G 473.27 161.8 3 & 58CO cG $ Placed only from 1513 level in 1971Ro08 58CO G 1139.4 5 58CO G 1147.61 175.5 8 & 58CO G 1488.20 255.2 10 58CO L 1522.54 22 58CO G 1157.0 41.5 4 58CO cG RI from I(1157|g+1159|g)=5.7 {I5} and 58CO2cG I(1157|g)/I(1411|g)=0.78 {I7} in (p,|g) 58CO G 1410.75 251.9 4 58CO L 1524.4 4 58CO G 1159.3 64.2 7 & 58CO G 1524.1 45.1 5 C 58CO L 1548.78 21 5+ 58CO G 473.27 161.8 3 & 58CO G 663.17 203.6 3 C 58CO L 1554.69 14(1+,2,3+) 58CO G 504.43 1220.8 10 & 58CO G 1189.4 4 B 58CO cG RI weak |g 58CO G 1555.3 38.1 14 B 58CO L 1605.59 15 3+ 58CO G 1147.61 175.5 8 & 58CO G 1494.66 257.9 9 58CO G 1606.3 42.8 4 B 58CO L 1730.0 3 1+ 58CO G 1356.1 5 1.8 6 [E4] B ? 58CO cG E$this transition to 373.9, 5+ seen only in (|a,n|g) is highly 58CO2cG improbable, it is either a wrong placement or defines a separate level 58CO3cG near this energy 58CO G 1363.14 20 8.5 5 C 58COF G FL=365.64 58COF G FLAG=G 58CO G 1730.5 41.1 3 B 58CO L 1740.5 4 58CO G 1628.7 45.7 5 B 58CO L 1749.35 19(3,4)+ 58CO G 863.3 2 4.9 6 B 58CO cG E$|g assigned to {+55}Mn(|a,p|g){+58}Fe in 1971Ro08, by 1971Xe01 58CO2cG observed it in coincidence with neutrons 58CO G 1696.9 52.6 3 B 58CO G 1749.4 53.1 5 B 58CO L 1757.2 3 (1+,2,3+) 58CO G 707.2 37.0 4 B 58CO G 1645.2 410.1 15 B 58CO L 1865.8 3 (2+,3,4+) 58CO G 979.9 5 1.5 5 B 58CO G 1408.1 4 B 58CO cG RI weak |g 58CO G 1813.3 6 1.3 3 B 58CO G 1866.0 102.5 1 B 58CO L 1928.99 20(7+) 58CO G 504.43 1220.8 10 & 58CO cG $ Placed only from 1929 level in 1971Ro08 58CO 56FE(T,NG) 1969SE01 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c Measured: |g 58CO cL J$From Adopted Levels 58CO L 0.0 2+ 58CO L 112 3+ 58CO G 112 58CO L 367 3+ 58CO G 367 58CO 56FE(3HE,P) 1973HA27,1973CA07 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1973Ha27: E=22 MeV, FWHM approximately 32 keV. 58CO2c accelerator. Measured |s(E,|q) 58CO c 1973Ca07: E=15.08 MeV, FWHM approximately 28 keV. Enriched targets, 58CO2c beam from University of Pennsylvania tandem accelerator. 58CO3c Measured |s(E,|q). 58CO c 1972Ly01: E=12 MeV, FWHM approximately 40 keV. Enriched targets. 58CO2c Measured |s(E,|q). 58CO cL E,L From 1973Ca07, except where noted otherwise. Relative |DE=5 58COxcL keV 58CO cL E There seems to be no relation between the strength of 58CO2cL excitation of levels and the peaks reported in this reaction. 58CO cL S$Values are from 1973Ca07, uncertainty=15% 58CO cL E(A) Observed only by 1973Ha27 58CO cL L(B) From 1973Ha27, 1972Ly01 58CO cL E(C) Observed by 1972Ly01 58CO L 0 2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.019 58CO cL E,S includes the 25 level (1973Ca07), but the contribution from 58CO2cL this level is expected to be small (1973Ha27) 58CO cL L$from 1973Ha27 58CO L 372 10 2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.026 58CO L 1048 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.261 58CO L 1242 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.015 58CO L 1372 15 0+2 A 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.031 mb/sr (1973Ha27) 58CO L 1425 15 0+2 A 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.029 mb/sr (1973Ha27) 58CO L 1608 10 2+(4) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.033 58CO cL L L=2+4 in 1972Ly01 58CO L 1669 10 4 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.021 58CO cL L L=0 (1972Ly01), L=2 (1973Ha27) 58CO L 1735 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.175 58CO cL L L=0 (1972Ly01) 58CO L 1819 10 0 B 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.195 58CO L 1872 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.364 58CO L 1984 10 2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.079 58CO L 2252 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.115 58CO cL L L=0 (1972Ly01) 58CO L 2343 10 2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.010 58CO L 2534 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.046 58CO L 2636 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.041 58CO cL L from 1973Ha27. L=(2) (1972Ly01), L=2 (1973Ca07) 58CO L 2740 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.017 58CO L 2850 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.013 58CO L 3100 10 2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.055 58CO L 3292 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.166 58CO cL L from 1973Ha27. L=2 (1972Ly01) 58CO L 3322 15 A 58CO L 3417 10 2+4 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.058 58CO cL L from 1972Ly01; L=2 (1973Ha27) 58CO L 3555 15 2 A 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.034 mb/sr (1973Ha27) 58CO cL From the relative strength of excitation of 3423 and 3555 58CO2cL in 1973Ha27, this level should have been seen by 1973Ca07. 58CO L 3613 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.046 58CO cL L from 1972Ly01 58CO L 3640 10 0+2 58CO L 3670 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.298 58CO cL S for 3670+3640 58CO L 3797 20 58CO cL L 1972Ly01 report L=0+2 for 3765 {I20} 58CO L 3923 20 A 58CO L 3970 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.018 58CO L 4009 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.027 58CO L 4049 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.020 58CO cL E doublet 58CO L 4107 10 (0+2) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.046 58CO L 4175 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.028 58CO L 4253 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.035 58CO L 4325 10 4 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.021 58CO L 4448 10 2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.049 58CO cL L$also 2 for 4419 {I20} in 1972Ly01 and for 4424 {I20} in 1973Ha27 58CO L 4555 10 (2) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.039 58CO cL L from 1972Ly01 58CO L 4708 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.030 58CO L 4849 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.117 58CO L 5057 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.056 58CO L 5183 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.049 58CO L 5306 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.030 58CO L 5392 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.103 58CO cL L L=0+2 in 1972Ly01 and 2 in 1973Ha27 58CO L 5454 10 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.062 58CO L 5495 20 2 58CO cL E average of 5497 {I20} (1972Ly01) and 5493 {I20} (1973Ha27) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.06 mb/sr (1972Ly01) 58CO L 5531 10 (0) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.080 58CO L 5651 10 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.162 58CO cL L$0 in 1972Ly01 58CO L 5739 10 0 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.965 58CO cL E,S probably a doublet (1973Ha27). Two 0+ levels at about this 58CO2cL energy are deduced from ({+3}He,p|g) data 58CO L 5852 20 C 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.09 mb/sr (1972Ly01) 58CO L 5888 20 C 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.08 mb/sr (1972Ly01) 58CO L 5948 20 C 58CO cL $d|s/d|W (max)=0.11 mb/sr (1972Ly01) 58CO 56FE(3HE,PG) 1973HA27 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c E=22 MeV; measured: |g, p|g coin. 58CO cG E Deduced from presented level energies and decay scheme 58CO cG E(A) May be composites of gammas from known 1044 and 1055 levels 58CO cL J Adopted values 58CO cL E(B) Probably 1048+1050 in Adopted Levels 58CO L 0.0 2+ 58CO L 113 43+ 58CO L 366 43+ 58CO G 366 58CO L 1048 4 B 58CO G 935 A 58CO G 1048 A 58CO L 1378 41+ 58CO G 330 58CO G 1378 58CO L 1434 41+ 58CO G 1434 58CO L 1730 4 1+ 58CO G 1730 58CO L 1817 40+ 58CO G 1817 58CO L 1868 41+ 58CO G 820 58CO G 1868 58CO L 2250 41+ 58CO G 2250 58CO L 3284 41+ 58CO G 1416 58CO G 2918 58CO G 3284 58CO L 3639 4 58CO G 2205 58CO G 2261 58CO G 2591 58CO L 5683 58CO L 5738 80+ 58CO G 4008 58CO G 4690 58CO L 5756 80+ 58CO G 4026 58CO 56FE(A,D) 1993YU07,1980OK03 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1993Yu07: E|a=35 MeV, FWHM=29 keV; measured |s(E(d),|q), |q(lab)= 58CO2c 15|'-75|', in steps of 5|' or 10|'. Microscopic DWBA analysis 58CO c 1980Ok03: E|a=23.9 MeV, FWHM|?80 keV; measured |s(E, |q); DWBA 58CO2c analysis. 58CO c Others: 58CO c 1994Fi01: E|a|?55 MeV, FWHM=120 keV; measured |s(E(d),|q), 58CO2c |q(lab)=15|'-25|', in 2.5|' steps, |q(lab)=30|'-70|', 58CO3c in 5|' steps. DWBA analysis. 58CO c 1994Vo01: gives a theoretical discussion of the data in 1994Fi01 58CO c 1969Lu07 (also 1968LuZY): E|a=50 MeV, FWHM=170 keV; 58CO2c measured |s(E,|q) 58CO cL E From 1980Ok03, unless indicated otherwise 58CO cL E(B) From 1993Yu07 58CO cL L From 1993Yu07 58CO cL J From DWBA analysis of 1993Yu07 58CO L 0 S 58CO L 24 (5)+ 4 58CO2 L FLAG=B 58CO L 374 (5)+ 4 58CO2 L FLAG=B 58CO L 880 58CO L 1075 6 58CO2 L FLAG=B 58CO L 1450 58CO L 1620 58CO L 1740 58CO L 1870 58CO L 1980 58CO L 2260 58CO L 2720 6 58CO L 2840 58CO L 3100 58CO L 3320 58CO L 3400 4 58CO2 L FLAG=B 58CO L 3750 306-&8- 7 58CO cL E from 1980Ok03 58CO cL J$a doublet with (f{-7/2},g{-9/2}){-8-}+(p{-3/2},g{-9/2}){-6-} 58CO2cL configuration according to the analysis of 1994Fi01 for a level at 58CO3cL 3720 who observe an enlarged line width. A single level with a 58CO4cL (f{-7/2},g{-9/2}){-8-} configuration is deduced by 1993Yu07 who 58CO5cL determine L=7 giving 6-,7-,or 8-, but assign J|p=8- based 58CO6cL on an expectation that the maximum coupling should dominate. 58CO L 3930 58CO L 4350 58CO L 4650 58CO cL J$1994Fi01 assign a (g{-9/2},p{-3/2}){-6-} configuration to this level; 58CO2cL and 1993Yu07 assign (f{-5/2},f{-5/2}){-5-}. 58CO L 6400 (1)+ 0 58CO cL E from 1969Lu07 and 1993Yu07 58CO L 6790 30(9)+ 8 58CO cL E from 1969Lu07 58CO 57FE(P,G) 1975ER07,1970ER03 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c Includes resonance data 58CO c 1970Er03, 1975Er07: E(p)=1.175 to 1.675 MeV (1970Er03), 58CO2c 1.580 to 2.125 MeV (1975Er07). 58CO c Measured: E|g, I|g for decay of the resonances E(p)=1.583, 1.602, 58CO2c 1.611, 1.626, 1.674, 1.685, 1.700 MeV (1975Er07); 1.467, 1557, 1583, 58CO3c 1626 MeV (1970Er03) 58CO c Other: 1969Se01: E(p)=0.8 to 1.5 MeV 58CO d 1969ErZZ is superseded by 1970Er03 and 1975Er07 58CO cG RI$Uncertainty assigned as 5% to 30% for primary transitions in 58CO2cG 1975Er07, according to a general statement by the authors. For some of 58CO3cG the transitions taken from 1970Er03, minimum uncertainty is 58CO4cG also assigned (by the evaluators) as 5% 58CO cG E(X)$Authors place these as tentative because of competing E|g=583 58CO2cG from {+208}Tl (in room background) and E|g=673 from 58CO3cG {+56}Fe(p,|g){+57}Co. However, their existence in {+58}Co is 58COxcG established from other work. 58CO cG E(A),RI(A)$From 1970Er03 58CO cG E(B),RI(B)$E|g from 1970Er03, I|g from 1975Er07, value from 1970Er03, 58CO2cG given under comments, is considered by the evaluators as superseded 58CO3cG in authors' 1975Er07 work 58CO cG E(C),RI(C)$From 1975Er07, E|g is from difference of level energies. 58CO2cG Uncertainty of 1 or 0.5 keV is assigned by the evaluators based on 58CO3cG those quoted in authors' earlier work 1970Er03 58CO tG $ --------------------------------------------------------------------- 58CO tG $ Secondary gamma rays from 1970Er03 58CO tG $ (|D(E|g)=1.0 keV when not stated) 58CO tG $E(level) 8396 level 8484 level 8510 level 8552 level 58CO tG $ (Ep=1467) (Ep=1557) (Ep=1583) (Ep=1626) 58CO tG $ E|g,I|g E|g,I|g E|g,I|g E|g,I|g 58CO tG $ 112 57.5 5 58CO tG $ 116 a 65.5 5 58CO tG $ 366 366.0 5;43 2 58CO tG $1048 931.2 5;1.0 5 b 932.0 5;3.0 5 b 933.0 5;2.5 5 b 931.0 5;5 1 b 58CO tG $1048 936.7 5;6.0 5 936.0 5;12.0 5 937.5 5;4.5 5 936.0 5;14.0 5 58CO tG $1048 1048.9 5;6 1 1048.1 5;17 1 1048.9 5;5.5 5 1047.9 5;18 1 58CO tG $1236 1236.2 5;14 1 m 1236.7 5;10 1 1235.7 5;3 1 1233.4 5;4.0 5 58CO tG $1352 986.1 5;3.0 5 986.3 5;3.0 5 984.7 5;17 1 985.3 5;5 1 58CO tG $1352 1236.2 (?) m 58CO tG $1352 1239.2;w 1239.0 5;6 1 1239.5 5;16 1 1239.0 5;w 58CO tG $1352 1352.1;w 1351.4;1.0 5 1352.0 5;5.5 10 58CO tG $1377 1376.5 5;8 1 1376.5 5;7 1 1376.8 5;7.5 10 1376.7 5;9 1 58CO tG $1434 1433.0 5;5.0 2 1434.4 5;2.0 5 1434.0 5;10 1 1433.5 5;13 1 58CO tG $1522 1157.8 5;4.0 5 1155.3 5;3.0 5 1155.3 5;5.0 5 58CO tG $1522 1410.6 5;6.0 5 1411.1 5;3.0 5 1410.3 5;7.5 10 58CO tG $1730 1730.5;5.0 5 1729.9;3.0 5 1730.3;1.0 2 1730.2;24 1 58CO tG $1743 a 1630.4;28 2 c 1628.1;12.0 5 c 1631.8;21 1 c 1631.2;246 7 c 58CO tG $1982 934.4 5;1.0 5 933.4 5;6.0 5 934.6 5;1.5 2 934.4 5;4.0 5 58CO tG $1982 1864.8;4.0 5 b 1863.1;2.0 5 b 1864.6;1.5 5 b 1865.2;7 1 b 58CO tG $2253 2246.5;1.0 5 2246.3;5 1 58CO tG $2478 a 2106.5;6 1 d 58CO tG $2532 1177.8;w 58CO tG $2614 a 1236.2 5 (?) m 58CO tG $2642 1590.8;2.0 5 n 1590.8;2.0 5 n 1590.1;3.0 5 n 1590.4;2 1 n 58CO tG $ 58CO tG $ a: level not reported in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ b: 931|g and 1864|g to 116 level reassigned in 1975Er07 to decay 58CO2tG from 1044 and 1867 levels, respectively. 58CO tG $ c: |g not reported in 1975Er07, but the level and 1628|g known in 58CO2tG another reaction 58CO tG $ d: unassigned |g ray near this energy in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ m: triple placement of 1236.2|g in only one resonance, placements 58CO2tG from 2614 and 1352 levels not given in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ n: |g not reported in 1975Er07, but the level is kept based on 58CO2tG a possible primary transition 58CO tG $ w: weak |g ray, no intensity available 58CO tG $ -------------------------------------------------------------------- 58CO tG $ 58CO tG $ -------------------------------------------------------------------- 58CO tG $ Unplaced secondary gamma rays from 1970Er03 58CO tG $ (|D(E|g)=1.0 keV when not stated) 58CO tG $ 8396 level 8484 level 8510 level 8552 level 58CO tG $ (Ep=1467) (Ep=1557) (Ep=1583) (Ep=1626) 58CO tG $ E|g,I|g E|g,I|g E|g,I|g E|g,I|g 58CO tG $ 58CO tG $ 326.5 5;4.5 5 e 58CO tG $ 432.6 5;3.5 5 e 58CO tG $ 495.4 5;5.0 5 f 58CO tG $ 841.4 5 g 843.0 5 g 58CO tG $ 911.1 5 f 908.4 5 f 907.8 5 f 58CO tG $ 1043.3 5;16 1 e 1042.6 5;18 1 e 1043.9 5;12 1 e 1041.5 5;20 1e 58CO tG $ 1124.2 5;11 1 e 1124.2 5;5 1 e 1122.2 5;4.0 5e 1121.1 5;8.0 5 58CO tG $ 1233.9 5;4 1 f 58CO tG $ 1363.7;3.0 5 e 1363.3;2 1 e 58CO tG $ 1477.7;4.0 5 f 58CO tG $ 1613.2 f 58CO tG $ 1777.4;2.0 5 f 1777.1;4.0 5 f 58CO tG $ 1813.1;3.0 5 e 1813.6;1.5 5 e 58CO tG $ 1974.5;4.0 5 h 58CO tG $ 2832 2;2.0 5 f 58CO tG $ 2989 2;2.0 5 f 58CO tG $ 3289.1;6 1 f 58CO tG $ 58CO tG $ e: |g assigned in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ f: |g not reported in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ g: |g assigned to an impurity in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ h: |g unassigned in 1975Er07 58CO tG $ --------------------------------------------------------------------- 58CO cL J,T$From Adopted Levels 58CO cL E$From 1975Er07, except where noted otherwise. 58CO4cL The energies of the unbound levels deduced 58CO5cL from proton resonances are deduced from S(p)+E(p)(c.m.), S(p)=6954.3 58CO6cL {I11} (2012Wa38). 1970Er03 and 1975Er03 used S(p)=6952 {I3}, 58CO7cL thus the quoted excitation energies are systematically lower than the 58CO8cL ones given here. Resonances with E(p)=1590, 1597, 1606, 1619, 1641, 58CO9cL 1650, 1658, 1663, 1666, 1669 in 1970Er03 are omitted here since not 58COAcL listed in authors' later work 1975Er07 58CO cL E(X)$From 1970Er03 58CO cL E(Y)$8549.4+8552.3 and 8625.1+8628.0 doublets are possible candidates 58CO2cL for analog states of the 2782, 1+ and 2876, 2+ levels, respectively, 58CO3cL in {+58}Fe 58CO cL E(Z)$Level only in 1970Er03, not confirmed in 1975Er07, thus 58CO2cL considered as uncertain. A level of similar energy has been seen 58CO3cL in other reactions and included in the Adopted Levels. 58CO cL E(A)$E(p) deduced in the lab system from value quoted by 1970Er03 58CO2cL which seems to be in c.m. system 58CO PN 7 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 58CO L 25.0 1 5+ 9.10 H 9 M1 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO L 52.8 1 4+ 10.5 US 3 M2 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO L 111.4 1 3+ 58CO L 365.6 2 3+ 58CO DL E$ 365 with 0.2 uncertainty (1975Er07) is assumed to be a 58CO2DL typographical error since they also report an EG=365.6 1 58CO G 365.6 1 58CO L 457.5 2 4+ 58CO G 432.6 2 100 58CO L 1040.0 2 3+ 58CO G 583.0 2 X 58CO G 674.5 2 X 58CO G 1040.0 2 58CO L 1044.1 2 (3+,4+) 58CO G 932.7 2 19 2 58CO G 1044.0 1 81 2 58CO L 1050.0 2 1+ 58CO G 938.6 1 49 2 58CO G 1050.0 1 51 2 58CO L 1236.6 2 2+ 58CO G 1125.2 1 47 5 58CO G 1236.5 2 53 5 58CO L 1353.4 2 (2)+ 58CO G 987.9 1 46 3 58CO G 1241.5 2 39 3 58CO G 1353.3 2 15 3 58CO L 1376.4 3 1+ 58CO G 326.0 2 58CO G 1376.0 5 58CO cG E partly or entirely due to {+56}Fe(p,|g){+57}Co 58CO L 1435.5 2 1+ 58CO G 1435.5 2 100 58CO L 1523.3 2 58CO G 1157.6 1 45 5 58CO G 1412.1 2 55 5 58CO L 1606.5 5 3+ 58CO G 1494.9 3 100 58CO L 1669.9 10 3+ 58CO G 619.9 2 100 58CO L 1729.9 5 1+ 58CO G 1363.6 2 43 5 58CO G 1730.7 3 57 5 58CO L 1741 4 Z 58CO G 1630.4 10 100 A 58CO DG E$ average of four values from 1970Er03 58CO L 1750.5 5 (3,4)+ 58CO G 1698.3 3100 58CO L 1867.7 5 1+ 58CO cL J$L-values in several particle transfer reactions strongly suggest 58CO2cL 1+ assignment for a level near 1867 keV. However, in (p,|g) experiment, 58CO3cL 1975Er07 suggest 2+ based on 1814.9|g placed from this level to 53, 4+ 58CO4cL level. Note that the 1814.9|g was not reported in {+56}Fe({+3}He,p|g) 58CO5cL reaction where the 1867 level was populated 58CO G 1814.9 3 40 10 [M3] ? 58CO cG $In view of high and unlikely multipolarity of M3 implied for this 58CO2cG transition, evaluators consider this placement, proposed only in 58CO3cG (p,|g), uncertain 58CO G 1867.7 3 60 10 58CO L 1978.8 10 3+ 58CO G 934.7 2 100 58CO L 2105 3 X 58CO L 2248.8 10 1+ 58CO G 2247.6 5 100 58CO L 2335.3 10 1+,2+,3+ 58CO G 2334.9 5 100 58CO L 2478 Z ? 58CO G 2107.5 3 ? 58COF G FL=365.6 58CO cG E$unassigned in 1975Er03, placed from 2478 level in 1970Er03 in 58CO2cG the decay of 8396 level with 6% {I1} branching 58CO L 2534.4 101+ 58CO G 1181.0 2 100 58CO L 2614 Z ? 58CO L 2625 5 ? 58CO L 2640.7 10 ? 58CO G 1590.8 10 ? 58CO cG E from 1970Er03, I|g=2.0 {I5} in the decay of 8396 level 58CO L 3011 5 2+ X 58CO L 3107 5 X 58CO L 3427 5 3+ X 58CO L 3512 5 (1)+ X 58CO L 8125.3 23 A 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1191 {I2} 58CO DL $ EP=1171 QUOTE BY 1970Er03 SEEMS IN C.M. SYSTEM, ENERGY OF THIS 58CO2DL PEAK IS HIGHER THAN 1171 IN SPECTRAL FIGURE SHOWN IN 1970Er03 58CO L 8127.3 23 A 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1193 {I2} 58CO DL $ EP=1173 QUOTE BY 1970Er03 SEEMS IN C.M. SYSTEM, ENERGY OF THIS 58CO2DL PEAK IS HIGHER THAN 1173 IN SPECTRAL FIGURE SHOWN IN 1970Er03 58CO L 8138.3 23 A 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1204 {I2} 58CO DL $ EP=1184 QUOTE BY 1970Er03 SEEMS IN C.M. SYSTEM, ENERGY OF THIS 58CO2DL PEAK IS HIGHER THAN 1184 IN SPECTRAL FIGURE SHOWN IN 1970Er03 58CO L 8144.3 23 A 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1210 {I2} 58CO DL $ EP=1190 QUOTE BY 1970Er03 SEEMS IN C.M. SYSTEM, ENERGY OF THIS 58CO2DL PEAK IS HIGHER THAN 1190 IN SPECTRAL FIGURE SHOWN IN 1970Er03 58CO L 8148.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1215 {I2} 58CO L 8159.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1226 {I2} 58CO L 8161.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1229 {I2} 58CO L 8164.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1232 {I2} 58CO L 8168.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1236 {I2} 58CO L 8172.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1240 {I2} 58CO L 8175.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1243 {I2} 58CO L 8182.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1250 {I2} 58CO L 8190.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1258 {I2} 58CO L 8196.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1264 {I2} 58CO L 8199.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1267 {I2} 58CO L 8203.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1271 {I2} 58CO L 8208.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1276 {I2} 58CO L 8210.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1278 {I2} 58CO L 8214.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1282 {I2} 58CO L 8217.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1285 {I2} 58CO L 8218.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1287 {I2} 58CO L 8227.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1296 {I2} 58CO L 8229.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1298 {I2} 58CO L 8232.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1301 {I2} 58CO L 8241.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1310 {I2} 58CO L 8244.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1313 {I2} 58CO L 8248.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1317 {I2} 58CO L 8253.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1322 {I2} 58CO L 8256.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1325 {I2} 58CO L 8263.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1332 {I2} 58CO L 8265.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1334 {I2} 58CO L 8272.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1341 {I2} 58CO L 8274.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1344 {I2} 58CO L 8278.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1348 {I2} 58CO L 8283.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1353 {I2} 58CO L 8289.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1359 {I2} 58CO L 8295.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1365 {I2} 58CO L 8299.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1369 {I2} 58CO L 8309.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1379 {I2} 58CO L 8312.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1382 {I2} 58CO L 8315.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1385 {I2} 58CO L 8319.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1389 {I2} 58CO L 8327.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1397 {I2} 58CO L 8335.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1406 {I2} 58CO L 8336.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1407 {I2} 58CO L 8343.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1414 {I2} 58CO L 8348.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1419 {I2} 58CO L 8352.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1423 {I2} 58CO L 8354.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1425 {I2} 58CO L 8362.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1433 {I2} 58CO L 8366.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1437 {I2} 58CO L 8371.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1442 {I2} 58CO L 8376.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1447 {I2} 58CO L 8378.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1449 {I2} 58CO L 8387.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1459 {I2} 58CO L 8389.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1461 {I2} 58CO L 8395.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1467 {I2} 58CO cL $Unassigned |g rays in 1970Er03: 1974.5 {I10} (4.0% {I5}), 58CO2cL 1477.7 {I10} (4.0% {I5}), 911.1 {I5}; not reported in 1975Er03 58CO G 4881 3 1.0 3 A 58CO G 4965 3 14 1 A 58CO G 5285 3 28 2 A 58CO DG E$ 5885 IN 1970Er03 IS A MISPRINT 58CO DG RI$ UNCERTAINTY INCREASED FROM 1 TO 2 (MINIMUM 5% AS SUGGESTED IN 58CO2DG 2005Er07) 58CO G 5381 3 3.0 5 A 58CO G 5914 3 2.0 5 A ? 58CO G 6048 3 6 1 A ? 58COF G FL=2335.3 58CO cG E$ poor fit in level scheme 58CO G 6663 3 8 1 A 58COF G FL=1729.9 58CO G 6868 3 10 1 A 58CO G 6956 3 2.0 5 A 58CO G 7014 4 5 1 A 58CO G 7039 4 6 1 A 58CO G 7155 3 5 1 A 58CO G 7347 3 6 1 A 58COF G FL=1050.0 58CO G 8395 3 5 1 A 58CO L 8397.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1469 {I2} 58CO L 8405.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1477 {I2} 58CO L 8409.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1481 {I2} 58CO L 8413.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1485 {I2} 58CO L 8415.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1487 {I2} 58CO L 8418.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1490 {I2} 58CO L 8420.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1492 {I2} 58CO L 8422.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1494 {I2} 58CO L 8427.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1499 {I2} 58CO L 8429.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1501 {I2} 58CO L 8431.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1503 {I2} 58CO L 8434.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1506 {I2} 58CO L 8437.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1509 {I2} 58CO L 8440.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1512 {I2} 58CO L 8445.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1518 {I2} 58CO L 8449.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1522 {I2} 58CO L 8451.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1524 {I2} 58CO L 8456.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1529 {I2} 58CO L 8459.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1532 {I2} 58CO L 8464.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1537 {I2} 58CO L 8469.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1542 {I2} 58CO L 8473.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1546 {I2} 58CO L 8476.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1549 {I2} 58CO L 8478.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1551 {I2} 58CO L 8483.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1556 {I2} 58CO L 8484.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1557 {I2} 58CO G 5835 3 2.0 5 A 58CO G 5851 3 3.0 5 A 58CO G 5867 3 2.0 5 A ? 58COF G FL=2614 58CO G 6740 3 10 1 A ? 58COF G FL=1741 58CO G 6955 3 3.0 5 A 58CO G 7105 3 13 1 A 58CO G 7130 4 3 1 A 58CO G 7249 4 5 1 A 58CO G 7432 3 23 2 A 58CO DG RI$ UNCERTAINTY INCREASED FROM 1 TO 2 (MINIMUM 5% AS SUGGESTED IN 58CO2DG 2005Er07) 58CO G 8482 3 34 2 A 58CO DG RI$ UNCERTAINTY INCREASED FROM 1 TO 2 (MINIMUM 5% AS SUGGESTED IN 58CO2DG 2005Er07) 58CO L 8486.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1559 {I2} 58CO L 8487.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1560 {I2} 58CO L 8490.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1563 {I2} 58CO L 8495.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1568 {I2} 58CO L 8500.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1573 {I2} 58CO L 8501.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1575 {I2} 58CO L 8506.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1580 {I2} 58CO L 8509.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1583 {I2} 58CO cL $An 8395 {I3} |g with I|g=0.5 {I2} and a 6769 {I4} |g with I|g=2.0 58CO2cL {I5} from 1970Er03 are omitted since 1975Er07 did not confirm a 116 58CO3cL level in {+58}Co and the 6769|g proposed in 1970Er03 58CO G 5872 3 2 LT B 58CO DG RI$ 3.5 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 5890 3 2 LT B 58COF G FL=2625 58CO DG RI$ 2.0 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 5979 3 2 LT B 58CO DG RI$ 4.0 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 6407 3 2 LT B 58CO DG RI$ 0.5 2 (1970Er03) 58CO G 6530 3 2 LT B 58CO DG RI$ 1.5 2 (1970Er03) 58CO G 6987 2 16 2 B 58CO DG RI$ 13 1 (1970Er03) 58CO G 7076 2 6 1 B 58CO DG RI$ 4.0 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 7138 3 2 LT B 58CO DG RI$ 4.0 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 7157 2 45 3 B 58CO DG RI$ 49 1 (1970Er03) 58CO G 7273 2 6 1 B 58CO DG RI$ 4.0 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 7461 2 11 1 B 58COF G FL=1050.0 58CO DG RI$ 6 1 (1970Er03) 58CO G 8145 3 3 1 B 58CO DG RI$ 2.0 5 (1970Er03) 58CO G 8400 3 5 1 B 58CO DG RI$ 1.0 2 (1970Er03) 58CO G 8459 3 4 1 B 58CO DG RI$ 0.5 2 (1970Er03) 58CO G 8485 3 1 C 58CO G 8512 3 2.0 5 B 58CO DG RI$ 1.5 2 (1970Er03) 58CO L 8515.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1589 {I2} 58CO L 8520.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1594 {I2} 58CO L 8528.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1602 {I2} 58CO G 6778 11 1 C 58CO G 7176 29 2 C 58CO G 7292 6 1 C 58CO G 7485 21 2 C 58COF G FL=1044.1 58CO G 8418 5 1 C 58CO G 8476 5 1 C 58CO G 8529 24 2 C 58CO L 8537.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1611 {I2} 58CO G 6808 13 1 C 58CO G 6868 9 1 C 58CO G 6931 9 1 C 58CO G 7102 16 1 C 58CO G 7162 7 1 C 58CO G 7301 2.0 5 C 58CO G 7494 13 1 C 58COF G FL=1044.1 58CO G 8427 7 1 C 58CO G 8538 25 2 C 58CO L 8541.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1615 {I2} 58CO L 8549.1 23 Y 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1623 {I2} 58CO L 8552.0 23 Y 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1626 {I2} 58CO cL $An 8439 {I4} |g with I|g=1.0 {I5} from 1970Er03 is omitted since 58CO2cL 1975Er07 did not confirm a 116 level in {+58}Co proposed in 1970Er03 58CO G 6300 3 9 1 C 58CO G 6824 2 31 2 C 58CO G 7120 3 7 1 C 58CO G 7319 3 9 1 C 58CO G 7502 3 31 2 A 58COF G FL=1050.0 58CO DG RI$ >25 (1975Er07) 58CO G 7508 5 LT C 58COF G FL=1044.1 58CO G 8190 4 4 1 C 58CO G 8443 4 2.0 5 C 58CO G 8553 3 6 1 C 58CO L 8558.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1633 {I2} 58CO L 8565.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1640 {I2} 58CO L 8573.7 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1648 {I2} 58CO L 8582.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1657 {I2} 58CO L 8588.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1663 {I2} 58CO L 8599.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1674 {I2} 58CO G 6732 8 1 C 58CO G 7077 2 LT C 58CO G 7164 2 LT C 58CO G 7226 14 1 C 58CO G 7247 15 1 C 58CO G 7363 2 LT C 58CO G 7556 31 2 C 58COF G FL=1044.1 58CO G 8600 32 2 C 58CO L 8605.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1680 {I2} 58CO L 8610.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1685 {I2} 58CO G 6275 9 1 C 58CO G 6361 4 1 C 58CO G 6505 9 1 C 58CO G 6631 4 1 C 58CO G 6742 11 1 C 58CO G 6859 2 LT C 58CO G 6880 2 LT C 58CO G 7087 2 LT C 58CO G 7175 12 1 C 58CO G 7234 22 1 C 58CO G 7257 9 1 C 58CO G 7373 2 LT C 58CO G 7566 18 1 C 58COF G FL=1044.1 58CO G 8610 15 1 C 58CO L 8616.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1692 {I2} 58CO L 8624.8 23 Y 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1700 {I2} 58CO G 6757 16 1 C 58CO G 6875 38 2 C 58CO G 6895 2 LT C 58CO G 6955 23 2 C 58CO G 7189 2 LT C 58CO G 7272 2 LT C 58CO G 7388 2 LT C 58CO G 7581 22 1 C 58COF G FL=1044.1 58CO G 8625 21 1 C 58CO L 8627.7 23 Y 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1703 {I2} 58CO L 8635.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1711 {I2} 58CO L 8643.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1719 {I2} 58CO L 8650.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1726 {I2} 58CO L 8653.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1729 {I2} 58CO L 8668.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1744 {I2} 58CO L 8672.9 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1749 {I2} 58CO L 8677.8 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1754 {I2} 58CO L 8687.6 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1764 {I2} 58CO L 8694.5 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1771 {I2} 58CO L 8699.4 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1776 {I2} 58CO L 8706.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1783 {I2} 58CO L 8709.3 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1786 {I2} 58CO L 8715.2 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1792 {I2} 58CO L 8721.1 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1798 {I2} 58CO L 8725.0 23 58CO cL $E(p)(LAB)=1802 {I2} 58CO 57FE(D,N),(D,NG) 1970BE33,1966OK02 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1970Be33: E=5.5 MeV; measured |g(|q,H,t) 58CO c 1966Ok02: E=11.7 MeV, FWHM|?300 keV; measured |s(E,|q) 58CO c J|p({+57}Fe)=1/2- 58CO cG E,RI$From 1970Be33 58CO cL E$From 1966Ok02, except for 28, 57 levels which are 58CO2cL from E|g of 1970Be33 58CO cL J,T$From Adopted Levels 58CO cL E(A)$Probably composite of several levels because of poor 58CO2cL energy resolution 58CO PN 5 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 3 58CO L 28 4 5+ 9.10 H 9 M1 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO L 57 3 4+ 10.5 US 3 M2 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO cL g=+1.046 {I2} (1970Be33) 58CO G 29 3 62 12 E2+M1 -2.3 4 51 4 58CO cG MR$-0.33 {I6} or -2.3 {I4} (1970Be33). However, comparison of 58CO2cG experimental and theoretical cross sections and isomer ratios from 58CO3cG {+58}Ni(n,p) and {+59}Co(n,2n) reactions over incident neutron energy 58CO4cG range of 0.97 to 20.35 MeV (1999Av04, 2004Se01, and 2015HoZZ) support 58CO5cG |d(E2/M1)=2.3 over 0.33 58CO cG CC$from Adopted Gammas for adopted E|g=28.30 {I15} 58CO G 57 3 100 [E2] 5.97 10 58CO cG CC$from Adopted Gammas for adopted E|g=52.96 {I13} 58CO L 1290 1 A 58CO L 1750 1 A ? 58CO L 2770 1 A 58CO 57FE(3HE,D) 1972SC13 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c E=18 MeV, FWHM|?14 keV 58CO c J|p({+57}Fe)=1/2- 58CO D 1971ScYZ and 1971ScZT superseded by 1972Sc13 58CO c Other: 1969Tr06 58CO c Measured: |s(E,|q) 58CO cL E$Authors quote a single set of energies for their (d,|a) and 58CO2cL ({+3}He,d) work, uncertainties are stated as 0.3% or 2 keV, whichever 58CO3cL is higher. 58CO cL E(A)$Labeled as 1512+1522 in both (d,|a) and ({+3}He,d), based on 58CO2cL known levels, but only one peak is resolved. The evaluators assign 58CO3cL energy of 1517 keV 58CO cL S Calculated average of values for J=L+1 and L-1 58CO2cL if J is not known 58CO CL S$LABEL=C2S' 58CO L 0.0 1 0.02 58CO L 54 2 3 0.86 58CO L 111 2 3 0.52 58CO L 366 2 3 0.17 58CO L 371 2 58CO L 455 2 58CO L 882 3 3+(1) 0.07 58CO L 1038 3 58CO L 1042 3 1 0.41 58CO L 1233 4 1 0.56 58CO L 1350 4 1 0.07 58CO L 1369 4 1 0.26 58CO L 1383 4 1 0.05 58CO L 1431 4 1 0.34 58CO L 1517 5 1 0.007 A 58CO L 1602 5 3 0.14 58CO L 1665 5 1+(3) 0.07+0.5 58CO L 1729 5 1 0.04 58CO L 1743 5 1+(3) 0.035 58CO L 1811 5 1 0.006 58CO L 1863 6 1 0.15 58CO L 1974 6 3+(1) .49+0.007 58CO L 2007 6 3 0.041 58CO L 2070 6 3 0.073 58CO L 2166 6 3 0.10 58CO L 2242 7 1 0.037 58CO L 2444 7 (1) 0.012 58CO L 2477 7 1 0.015 58CO L 2524 8 1 0.12 58CO L 2624 8 1 0.20 58CO L 2646 8 3+(1) .42+0.007 58CO L 2695 8 1 0.09 58CO L 2733 8 (1+3) .62+.035 58CO L 2781 8 1 0.05 58CO L 2844 9 4 0.12 58CO L 2884 9 1 0.004 58CO L 2946 9 3 0.19 58CO L 2995 9 (0) 0.002 58CO L 3007 9 3 0.096 58CO L 3062 9 3 0.17 58CO L 3096 9 1 0.03 58CO L 3123 9 1+3 0.007+.046 58CO L 3186 10 3 0.075 58CO L 3199 10 0 0.004 58CO L 3226 10 1+(3) .038+.088 58CO L 3243 10 (1) 0.013 58CO L 3261 10 1+(3) .010+.023 58CO L 3337 10 1+(3) .12+.27 58CO L 3376 10 1+3 .023+.20 58CO L 3414 10 1+(3) .048+.11 58CO L 3442 10 1 0.032 58CO L 3455 10 3 0.35 58CO L 3517 11 1 0.033 58CO L 3526 11 (1+3) .010+.077 58CO L 3548 11 1 0.018 58CO L 3559 11 (0) 0.005 58CO L 3607 11 (1+3) 0.005+.036 58CO L 3619 11 58CO L 3639 11 1 0.048 58CO L 3668 11 1 0.16 58CO L 3685 11 1 0.019 58CO L 3725 11 3+(1) .067+0.002 58CO L 3775 11 1 0.068 58CO L 3790 11 (0) 0.01 58CO L 3806 11 2 0.13 58CO L 3853 12 1 0.049 58CO L 3869 12 1 0.008 58CO L 3898 12 0 0.005 58CO L 3916 12 2 0.06 58CO L 3943 12 1 0.009 58CO L 3957 12 1+(3) .039+0.08 58CO L 4006 12 1 0.065 58CO L 4082 12 1+(3) .045+0.14 58CO L 4097 12 (1+4) 0.026+0.62 58CO L 4110 12 (4+2) .71+.055 58CO L 6140 18 (0) 0.035 58CO 58FE(P,N),(P,NG) 1975BR05,1972HA61 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1975Br05 (also 1973BrYA): E=3.33-4.73 MeV; measured E|g, I|g, |g(|q) 58CO c 1972Ha61 (also 1972Ge14): E=3.9 MeV; measured E|g, I|g, T{-1/2}, 58CO2c n|g(|q), p|g(|q,H), |g(|q,H) 58CO c Others: 58CO c 1988Wa07: E=120 MeV; measured |s|q, deduced Gamow-Teller strengths 58CO2c resonances and transition strengths. 58CO c 1978Wo14: E=20.2 MeV; measured |s(E,|q) 58CO c 1970Ta01: E=3.65 to 6.06 MeV; FWHM|?10 keV; tof, measured level 58CO2c energies. 58CO D CROSS SECTIONS AND YIELDS MEASURED: 1996Su07, 1994Su18, 1993Ti06, 58CO2D 1990Za10, 1985Bl12, 1975Ca18, 1974Gr34, 1971Be46 58CO D CALCULATED SIGMA, SIGMA(THETA): 2007Ha52 58CO D ANALYZED SIGMA: 2008Br05: E=7.5, 12.4, 24.8 MEV 58CO c All data for E|<112 levels are from 1972Ha61, except where noted 58CO cG MR All |d for E|g>100 keV are from |g(|q) in 1975Br05 58CO cG RI % photon branching from each level (1971Ro08) 58CO cL E$E|<112 (1972Ha61); E=366-2441 (1970Ta01); E>2441 58CO2cL (1978Wo14), unless indicated otherwise. 58CO cL S$Relative strength of excitation (1978Wo14). Note that the peaks 58CO2cL are not well resolved and level association is somewhat arbitrary 58CO cL L$Assumed value for pure L=0 spin-flip transitions to J|p=1+ 58CO2cL states (1978Wo14), except for 1730+1870 unresolved group and 58CO3cL for 5800 group where L value is from |s(|q) distribution 58CO cL J,T$From Adopted Levels 58CO PN 7 58CO L 0.0 2+ 70.86 D 6 58CO L 24.9 5+ 9.10 H 9 M1 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO L 53.2 3 4+ 10.5 US 3 M2 58CO2 L %IT=100 58CO G 28.3 36 3 58CO G 53.2 64 3 58CO L 111.5 5 3+ 0.18 NS 3 58CO cL g=+0.74 {I13} 58CO G 58.3 40 4D(+Q) -0.02 3 58CO cG M A{-2}=-0.12 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I7} 58CO G 111.5 60 4D(+Q) -0.02 2 58CO cG M A{-2}=-0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I5}, |d=-0.04 {I2} (1972Ha61) 58CO L 366 3 3+ 58CO G 366 100 D(+Q) 0.00 1 58CO L 374 5+ 58CO cL E from 1975Br05 58CO G 321 100 D(+Q) -0.03 2 58CO L 455 3 4+ 58CO G 432 100 D+Q -0.07 2 58CO L 884 4 58CO L 1037 4 3+ 1.2 58CO G 583 100 D(+Q) -0.02 6 58CO L 1044 5 1+ [0] 1.0 58CO cL E$ 1050 (1978Wo14) 58CO L 1180 5 5+ 58CO L 1236 5 2+ 58CO L 1352 5 (2)+ 58CO L 1368 5 1+ 58CO L 1376 5 1+ 58CO L 1415 5 (5)+ 58CO L 1433 5 1+ [0] 58CO cL E a doublet at 1400 (1978Wo14) 58CO G 1435 D+(Q) 0.00 8 58CO L 1520 5 58CO L 1545 5 5+ 58CO L 1602 5 3+ 58CO L 1664 5 3+ 58CO L 1725 5 1+ 58CO L 1734 5 [0] 1.7 58CO cL L$ combined angular distribution for 1734+1864 shows L=0 shape 58CO cL E 1730 (1978Wo14) 58CO L 1745 5 (3,4)+ 58CO L 1777 6 3+,4+,5+ 58CO L 1810 6 0+ 58CO L 1829 6 58CO L 1841 6 3+ 58CO L 1864 6 1+ [0] 1.6 58CO cL E 1870 (1978Wo14) 58CO cL L$ combined angular distribution for 1734+1864 shows L=0 shape 58CO L 1975 6 3+ 58CO L 2008 6 2+,3+,4+ 58CO L 2071 6 4+ 58CO L 2166 7 3+ 58CO L 2245 7 1+ [0] 0.5 58CO cL E 2250 (1978Wo14) 58CO L 2260 7 58CO L 2339 7 1+,2+,3+ 58CO L 2420 7 58CO L 2441 8 (1+,2+) 58CO L 2640 1+ [0] 1.7 58CO L 3290 1+ [0] 0.5 58CO L 5800 0+ 0 58CO cL E probable IAS of {+58}Fe(g.s.) 58CO cL L$ from angular distribution 58CO 58FE(3HE,T) 1971BE29,1970DZ01 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FMT$AUT=C. Morse$DAT=20-Feb-2026$ 58CO2 H COM=Small changes for compatibility with JSON format 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c E=24.6 MeV, FWHM=12 keV (1970Dz01); FWHM=8 keV (1971Be29) 58CO c Measured: |s(E,|q) 58CO cL E From 1971Be29 58CO cL $|s(|q) at 18|' in |mb/sr (1970Dz01) 58CO cL J From assumption that both levels are IAS of {+58}Fe(g.s.). 58CO2cL (1970Dz01) states that |s(|q) for these levels is 58CO3cL typical for L=0 and differs from that for known J|p=1+ with a 58CO3cL large component L=2 58CO L 0 S 58CO L 5739 8 0+ 0 58CO cL $|s(|q)=90 {I18} 58CO L 5759 8 0+ 0 58CO cL $|s(|q)=98 {I20} 58CO 58NI(D,2HE) 2005HA03,2004HA01 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 2005Ha03 (also 2004Ha01,2003Wo10,2001Wo07): E=170 MeV. Measured {+2}H 58CO2c spectra, |s(|q) from 0.5|' to 5.5|' (c.m.). FWHM=130 keV. Detection 58CO3c system: focal-plane detection system composed of two vertical drift 58CO4c chambers, each having 240 wires; and focal-plane polarimeter 58CO5c consisting of two planes of plastic scintillators, four multiwire 58CO6c proportional chambers and a graphite analyzer. Deduced Gamow-Teller 58CO7c strengths. DWBA analysis, large-scale Shell-model calculations 58CO cL $B(>) values (Gamow-Teller strengths) are from 2004Ha01 58CO cL E$Rounded values from Adopted Levels for levels up to 2300, above 58CO2cL this energy values are from 2005Ha03 (also 2004Ha01). 58CO cL $d|s/d|W values are from 2005Ha03, uncertainties from 2004Ha01. 58CO2cL Corresponding values in 2004Ha01 are the same, except in a few cases. 58CO cL J$ From dominant L=0 component. All states are interpreted as 58CO2cL T=2, J|p=1+ 58CO L 1050 1+ 0+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.140 {I9} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.15 {i1} 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.159 mb/sr {I9} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 9835 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 1435 1+ 0 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.078 {I6} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.09 {i1} 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 10211 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 1729 1+ 0 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.148 {I14} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.16 {i2} 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 10492 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 1868 1+ 0 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.648 {I20} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.72 {i5} 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 10664 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 2249 1+ 0 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.047 {I4} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.05 {i1} 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 11003 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 2660 25 1+ 0+1 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.055 {I5} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.06 {i1} 58CO dL $d|s/d|W=0.057 mb/sr {I5} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 11423 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 2860 25 1+ 0(+1) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.143 {I9} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.17 {i1} 58CO dL $d|s/d|W=0.145 mb/sr {I9} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 11661+11683 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 3100 25 1+ 0(+1) 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.125 {I8} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.15 {i1} 58CO dL $d|s/d|W=0.126 mb/sr {I8} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 11883 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 3410 25 1+ 0+1 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.062 {I7} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.07 {i1} 58CO dL $d|s/d|W=0.065 mb/sr {I7} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 12197 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 3520 25 1+ 0+1+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.076 {I9} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.09 {i1} 58CO dL $d|s/d|W=0.080 mb/sr {I9} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 12293 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 3625 25 1+ 0+1+2 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.058 {I7} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.07 {i1} 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.067 mb/sr {I7} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 12386 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 3900 25 1+ 0+1 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.060 {I6} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.07 {i1} 58CO dL $d|s/d|W=0.062 mb/sr {I6} (2004Ha01) 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 12636 in {+58}Ni 58CO L 4030 25 1+ 0 58CO cL $d|s/d|W=0.155 {I10} 58CO cL $B(>)=0.19 {i1} 58CO cL E$probable parent of isobaric analog of 12738 in {+58}Ni 58CO 58NI(T,3HE) 1985AJ02 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1985Aj02 (also 1984Aj03): E=25 MeV, Q3D spectrograph, FWHM|?23 keV. 58CO2c Measured |s(E,|q) from 5.5|' to 50|' (lab), DWBA and coupled- 58CO3c channel analysis 58CO c 2006Co14 (also 2005Ze04,2007Ze03): E=115 MeV/nucleon secondary triton 58CO2c beam was produced from primary |a beam at 140 MeV/nucleon hitting a 58CO3c {+9}Be target. The A-1200 fragment separator was used to separate 58CO4c triton beam. Magnetic spectrometer S-800 was used to detect {+3}He 58CO5c particles. Time-of-flight method and energy loss measurements were 58CO6c used to identify {+3}He particles. FWHM|?250 keV. Measured |s(q) 58CO7c from 0|' to 4.5|'. DWBA analysis. Large-scale shell-model 58CO8c calculations. Two pronounced groups were observed at 2 MeV and 4 MeV 58CO9c which were forward peaked indicating L=0 (Gamow-Teller) transitions. 58COAc The |s(|q) distribution for peak in the 1.75-2.0 MeV range and 0|' 58COBc to 4.5|'is consistent with mixed 1+ and 2+ states. At angles of 58COCc 2|'-3|', a wide structure between 7-15 MeV was observed with probable 58CODc L=1 (dipole) transitions due to isovector spin giant dipole resonance 58COEc (L=1, S=1, J|p=0-,1-,2-) and its non-spin-flip partner 58COFc (L=1, S=0, J|p=1-) 58CO c 2006Gu02: E=130 MeV. Magnetic spectrometer BBS was 58CO2c used to detect {+3}He particles. FWHM|?350 keV. Measured |s(q) from 58CO7c 0.33|' to 6.6|'(c.m.). DWBA and RPA analysis. Two pronounced groups 58CO8c were observed at 2 MeV and 4 MeV which were forward peaked indicating 58CO9c L=0 (Gamow-Teller) transitions and a wide structure between 7-15 MeV 58COAc was observed with probable L=1 (dipole) transitions 58CO cL J$From |s(|q) and coupled-channels analysis normalized 58CO2cL to seven lowest states with adopted J|p from Adopted Levels. 58CO cL E(A)$Unresolved group 58CO cL E(B),J(B)$Analyzed as a combined 367+385 unresolved group. The 58CO2cL angular distribution could be fitted by L=2+4 corresponding to 58CO3cL known 3+ and 5+ for the 367 and 385 levels, respectively. 58CO cL E(C)$The |s(|q) distribution not shown in figure 6 of 1985Aj02. 58CO cL E(D)$B(GT)=0.72 {i5} (2006Co14) 58CO L 0.0 2+ 2 58CO L 25 3 5+ 4+6 58CO L 53 3 4+ 4 58CO L 112 3 3+ 2+4 58CO L 367 5 3+ B 58CO L 385 10 5+ B 58CO L 460 8 4+ 4 58CO L 889 8 4+,3+ 4 58CO L 1044 10 3+ 2+4 A 58CO L 1052 8 1+ 0+2 58CO L 1073 15 58CO L 1133 15 58CO L 1191 10 5+ 4+6 58CO L 1242 10 2+ 2 A 58CO L 1377 10 1+ 0+2 A 58CO L 1424 8 3+ 2+4 58CO L 1447 10 1+ 0+2 58CO L 1527 10 2+,3+ 2 58CO L 1555 10 5+ 4+6 58CO L 1610 10 4+,3+ 4 58CO L 1674 10 3+,2+ 2,2+4 58CO L 1738 10 1+ 0+2 A 58CO L 1843 10 3+ 2+4 58CO L 1870 10 1+ 0+2 D 58CO L 1977 10 3+ 2+4 58CO L 2015 10 58CO L 2074 10 4+,5+ 4 58CO L 2102 10 58CO L 2171 15 3+ 2+4 A 58CO L 2241 10 1+ 0+2 58CO L 2336 10 58CO L 2459 15 A 58CO L 2481 15 2+ 2 58CO L 2523 15 58CO L 2634 15 3+,2+ 2,2+4 A 58CO L 2700 15 58CO L 2741 15 5+ 4+6 58CO L 2776 15 58CO L 2858 12 4+,5+ 4 58CO L 2893 15 58CO L 2953 15 58CO L 2997 15 2+ 2 58CO L 3069 15 5+ 4+6 C 58CO L 3100 15 2+,3+ 2 A 58CO L 3154 15 58CO L 3216 20 3+ 2+4 58CO L 3237 15 A 58CO L 3290 15(1+) 0+2 58CO L 3346 15 A 58CO L 3403 15 4+,5+ 4 58CO L 3431 15 3+ 2+4 58CO L 3484 20 58CO L 3518 20(4+) C 58CO L 3545 20 58CO L 3612 20(1+) 0+2 A 58CO L 3668 20(1+) 0+2 A 58CO L 3720 20(3+) 2+4 A 58CO L 3781 15 A 58CO L 3804 20 58CO L 3890 20(2+) 2 58CO L 3925 20(2+,1+) 2 58CO L 3957 20 58CO L 4021 20(3+) 2+4 58CO L 4053 20 2+ 2 58CO L 4087 20(4+) C 58CO L 4113 20 58CO L 4170 20 58CO L 4206 20 A 58CO L 4287 20 A 58CO 59CO(N,2NG) 1976PR16 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c E=16.2, 18.1, 19.3, 20.5, and 21.8 MeV 58CO c Measured: |g, |g production cross sections at different E(n) 58CO cL J$From Adopted Levels 58CO cL E For levels |<111.5, the energies are rounded-off adopted 58CO2cL values. 58CO L 0.0 2+ 58CO L 24.9 5+ 58CO L 53.1 4+ 58CO L 111.5 3+ 58CO L 367.3 23+ 58CO G 367.3 2 58CO L 375 15+ 58CO G 322.9 2 58CO G 348.7 3 58CO L 458.5 34+ 58CO G 433.6 2 58CO L 886.2 53+,4+ 58CO G 774.7 4 58CO L 1051.3 51+ 58CO G 1051.3 5 58CO L 1078 16+ 58CO G 702.9 4 58CO L 1185.9 65+ 58CO G 727.4 4 58CO L 1238.8 82+ 58CO G 1238.8 8 58CO L 1522.6 10 ? 58CO G 1522.6 10 ? 58CO L 1555.7 10(1+,2,3+) ? 58CO G 1555.7 10 ? 58CO 59CO(P,D) 1978IK02,1965BA29,1964LE10ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c J|p({+59}Co g.s.)=7/2- 58CO c 1978Ik02: E=50 MeV beam produced and focused by Raiden magnetic 58CO2c spectrograph at RCNP; deuterons detected and identified by two 58CO3c proportional counters and plastic scintillator. 58CO4c Measured excitation energies. FWHM=15 keV 58CO c E=22 MeV, FWHM=25-30 keV (1965Ba29); 18.5 MeV, FWHM=45 keV (1964Le10) 58CO c Measured: |s(E) (1965Ba29), |s(E,|q) (1964Le10) 58CO cL S$From 1964Le10 58CO cL E$From 1965Ba29 for levels below 1100 keV; from 1964Le10 for 58CO2cL levels between 1700-3000 keV and from 1978Ik02 for levels above 58CO2cL 3000 keV 58CO cL L(B),S(B)$L=1, S=0.42 for g.s.+25 doublet 58CO cL L(A),S(A)$L=1, S=0.92 for 350+440 doublet 58CO L 0.0 B 58CO L 25 B 58CO L 90 58CO L 350 A 58CO L 440 A 58CO L 1030 1 0.19 58CO L 1750 ? 58CO L 2610 3 2.2 58CO L 5656 25 58CO L 5703 25 0+ 58CO cL E$ analog of {+58}Fe g.s 58CO L 5722 25 58CO L 5736 25 58CO L 5835 25 58CO 59CO(D,T) 1971RO08 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c J|p({+59}Co target)=7/2- 58CO c 1971Ro08: E=15-16.5 MeV, FWHM|?8 keV. Measured: |s(E,|q) 58CO c Other: 1960Ze02 58CO cL J Adopted values 58CO cL S$The values corresponding to L=3 are approximate. 58CO L 0.0 2+ 1+3 0.19+(.06) 58CO L 25 35+ 1+3 0.35+(.44) 58CO L 52 34+ 1+3 0.19+(.41) 58CO L 112 33+ 1+3 0.08+(.21) 58CO L 365 33+ 1+3 0.44+(.15) 58CO L 375 35+ 1+3 0.15+(.05) 58CO L 456 34+ 1+3 0.74+(.03) 58CO L 888 33+,4+ 1+(3) 0.05 58CO L 1043 3(3+,4+) 1+3 0.12+(.02) 58CO L 1078 36+ 3 0.09 58CO 59CO(3HE,A) 1972SC13 ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1972Sc13: E=18 MeV. Measured |s(E) at 15|' and 30|', FWHM|?16 58CO2c keV. 58CO c For 2692 level with J|p=(7+), |s is six times larger than for 58CO2c any other level seen 58CO cG E$ Taken by the evaluators from spectral figure 3 of 1972Sc13. 58CO2cG The authors point out observing a new level at 3159 keV. This 58CO3cG group in Adopted Levels is associated with 3146 and/or 3169 levels 58CO L 0.0 58CO L 25 58CO L 54 58CO L 111 58CO L 370 58CO L 455 58CO L 882 58CO L 1040 58CO L 1050 ? 58CO L 1073 58CO L 1182 58CO L 1233 ? 58CO L 1414 58CO L 1512 58CO L 1546 58CO L 1729 58CO L 1778 58CO L 1811 58CO L 1827 58CO L 2007 58CO L 2071 58CO L 2166 58CO L 2225 58CO L 2242 58CO L 2339 58CO L 2456 58CO L 2477 58CO L 2524 58CO L 2605 58CO L 2624 ? 58CO L 2631 58CO L 2692 58CO L 2733 58CO L 2742 58CO L 2849 58CO L 2884 58CO L 2946 58CO L 3007 58CO L 3044 58CO L 3072 58CO L 3090 58CO L 3127 58CO L 3159 58CO L 3221 58CO L 3243 58CO L 3279 58CO L 3402 58CO L 3422 58CO L 3488 58CO L 3526 58CO L 3548 58CO L 3639 58CO L 3688 58CO L 3783 58CO L 3799 58CO L 3909 58CO L 3930 58CO L 3946 58CO L 4093 58CO L 4127 58CO L 4179 58CO L 4196 58CO L 4316 58CO L 4400 58CO 60NI(D,A),(POL D,A) 1972SC13,1981NA13,1988NA01ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$ 58CO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$ 58CO c 1972Sc13: E(d)=17 MeV, FWHM=9-14 keV. Beam from University of 58CO2c Pittsburgh Van de Graaff Accelerator. Measured |s(E,|q) 58CO c 1981Na13: E(d)=80 MeV, FWHM|?60 keV. 58CO2c Beam from Indiana University cyclotron. Measured |s(E, |q) 58CO c 1988Na01: E(pol d)=79 MeV, FWHM|?55-60 keV. Beam from Michigan State 58CO2c accelerator. Measured vector analyzing powers, |s(E,|q) 58CO cL E$|DE=2 keV or 0.3% of E, whichever is larger (1972Sc13). Authors quote 58CO2cL a single set of energies for their (d,|a) and ({+3}He,d) studies 58CO cL L From 1972Sc13, except where noted otherwise 58CO cL S |s(max) in |mb/sr (1972Sc13) 58CO cL J From L and vector analyzing power (1988Na01) 58CO cL E(B) Seen only at E(d)=12 MeV 58CO cL L(E) From 1981Na13, 1988Na01; L=4+2 for 371+366 (1972Sc13) 58CO cL L(F) From 1981Na13. L=(6) in 1972Sc13 58CO cL L(G) From 1981Na13, L=(3,6) in 1972Sc13 58CO cL E(H) From 1988Na01 58CO cL E(C) Labeled as 1512+1522 in both (d,|a) and ({+3}He,d) based on 58CO2cL known levels, but only one peak is resolved. The evaluators assign 58CO3cL E=1517. 58CO cL E(D) 3547 in authors' table is assumed to be an error 58CO L 0 2 25 58CO L 25 2 5+ 4 262 58CO L 54 2 (4) 5.5 58CO L 111 2 5.5 58CO L 366 2 58CO L 371 2 5+ 4 343 E 58CO L 455 2 4 15 58CO L 882 3 (4) 5.9 58CO L 1038 3 2 136 58CO L 1042 3 58CO L 1073 3 6 8.6 58CO L 1182 4 4 53 58CO L 1233 4 (2) 13 58CO L 1350 4 5 LT 58CO L 1376 4 B 58CO L 1414 4 4 12 58CO L 1431 4 (0) 5.9 58CO L 1517 5 2 11 C 58CO L 1546 5 4 31 58CO L 1602 5 (4) 11 58CO L 1665 5 (2,4) 12 58CO L 1729 5 0 32 58CO L 1741 5 (4) 11 58CO L 1743 5 58CO L 1778 5 4 19 58CO L 1827 5 (2,4) 34 58CO L 1844 6 2 68 58CO L 1863 6 0 85 58CO L 1925 6 (2) 12 58CO L 1974 6 2 25 58CO L 2007 6 6.2 58CO L 2071 6 4 37 58CO L 2166 6 2 18 58CO L 2225 7 (6) 11 58CO L 2242 7 0 11 58CO L 2420 7 B 58CO L 2444 7 (2) 5.8 58CO L 2456 7 6.4 58CO L 2510 8 B 58CO L 2524 8 2 20 58CO L 2605 8 (4) 4.9 58CO L 2631 8 4 8.3 58CO L 2692 8 7+ 6 157 58CO L 2733 8 (2,3) 20 58CO L 2761 8 (6) 3.7 58CO L 2781 8 (0+2) 15 58CO L 2792 8 (0+2) 8.3 58CO L 2819 8 4 6.6 58CO L 2837 9 B 58CO L 2849 9 4 14 58CO L 2865 9 B 58CO L 2884 9 (2) 10 58CO L 2907 9 B 58CO L 2931 9 7+ 6 9.7 F 58CO L 2946 9 2 8.4 58CO L 2987 9 2 139 58CO L 3007 9 7.0 58CO L 3044 9 B 58CO L 3062 9 4.4 58CO L 3072 9 (6) 5.3 58CO L 3090 9 (1,2) 14 58CO L 3100 9 B 58CO L 3118 9 0,(4) 13 58CO L 3146 9 (2) 18 58CO L 3169 10 20 58CO L 3184 10 0 20 58CO L 3199 10 (1) 15 58CO L 3214 10 (3) 13 58CO L 3221 10 B 58CO L 3232 10 (1) 22 58CO L 3279 10 (2) 14 58CO L 3309 10 B 58CO L 3337 10 2 9.8 58CO L 3394 10 (0,1) 31 58CO L 3410 10 (1) 28 58CO L 3422 10 (2,3) 27 58CO L 3455 10 (0) 34 58CO L 3470 10 B 58CO L 3488 10 4 15 58CO L 3507 11 (3) 20 58CO L 3517 11 (0) 12 58CO L 3548 11 5.8 B 58CO L 3574 11 58COF L FLAG=D 58CO L 3604 11 (4) 5.8 58CO L 3639 11 (3) 8.3 58CO L 3659 11 5.3 58CO L 3689 11 (3) 11 58CO L 3736 11 (1) 8.6 58CO L 3759 11 (1,4) 20 58CO L 3779 11 (1) 9.2 58CO L 3801 117+ 6 15 G 58CO L 3806 11 58CO L 3833 11 B 58CO L 3853 12 58CO L 3869 12 58CO L 3898 12 58CO L 3916 12 58CO L 3943 12 58CO L 3957 12 58CO L 4006 12 58CO L 4082 12 58CO L 4097 12 58CO L 4110 12 58CO L 4790 307+ 6 H 58CO L 5040 305+ 4 H 58CO L 6140 18 58CO COMMENTS ENSDF 201510 58CO H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.D. NESARAJA AND B. SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=31-OCT-2015$ 58CO C TITL$NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS FOR 58CO 58CO c AUTH$CAROLINE D. NESARAJA 58CO c INST$Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, 58CO#c Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6354, USA 58CO c AUTH$BALRAJ SINGH 58CO c INST$Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, 58CO#c Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada 58CO c ABST$Main modification in this update is that a larger mixing ratio of 58CO2c 2.3 is adopted for the 28.30-keV transition from 58.15, 4+ level in 58CO3c {+58}Co, based on comparison of experimental and theoretical reaction 58CO4c cross sections, and isomer-ratio data in 1999Av04, 2004Se01, and 58CO5c 2015HoZZ. The first two references were, inadvertently, missed in the 58CO6c 2010 update of A=58 nuclides (2010Ne01). The magnetic dipole moments 58CO7c are from 2014StZZ compilation and electric quadruple moments from 58CO8c 2013StZZ evaluation. The half-life of the g.s. of {+58}Co has been 58CO9c revisited in the context recent evaluations (2014Un01,2012Fi12, DDEP 58COAc evaluation in 2013) and compilation by 2013Be43, but our analysis 58COBc suggests the same recommended value as was adopted in the previous 58COCc Nuclear Data Sheets publication (2010Ne01). The excitation energies 58CODc deduced from proton resonances in {+57}Fe(p,|g) reaction have been 58COEc adjusted for updated S(p) value for {+57}Co in 2012Wa38, both in the 58COFc (p,|g) and the Adopted datasets 58CO c CUT$Literature available up to October 31, 2015 has been consulted. 58CO2c The NSR database (2011Pr03) was the prime bibliographic source used 58CO3c for literature search 58CO C CIT$ENSDF 58CO c FUND$Work supported by the Office of Nuclear Physics, Office of 58COxc Science, U.S. Department of Energy