90TC ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS 20NDS 202005 90TC H TYP=FUL$AUT=S. K. Basu, E.A. MCCUTCHAN$CIT=NDS 165, 1 (2020)$ 90TC2 H CUT=1-Mar-2020$ 90TC Q -5841 4 11401 4 2999 4 -4016 6 2017WA10 90TC cQ $S(2n)=25190 {I150}; S(2p)=9130 {I60}; Q(|ep)= 2612 (syst) {I24} 90TC2cQ (2017Wa10) 90TC cL E$Deduced by evaluators from a least-squares fit to E|g, except where 90TC2cL noted. 90TC cL J$Spin and parity assignments for excited states are based on |g-ray 90TC2cL multipolarities and on the assumption that |g-ray deexcitation takes 90TC3cL place through yrast states. Spin and parities of the (8+) and (6+) 90TC4cL levels are based on shell-model calculations which use a 90TC5cL configuration space of only the 2p1/2 and 1g9/2 orbitals for protons 90TC6cL and neutrons (1993Ru03). 90TC cL T$From recoil-distance Doppler-shift method in (HI,xn|g), except 90TC2cL where noted. (1994Ru13) 90TC cL T(A)$Effective half-life from (HI,xn|g), not corrected for feeding 90TC cG E,RI$From (HI,xn|g), except where noted. 90TC cG M,MR$From |g(|q) in {+58}Ni({+35}Cl,2pn|g) and DCO ratios in 90TC2cG {+58}Ni({+36}Ar,3pn|g), both from (HI,xn|g) dataset. 90TC CL BAND(P)$Negative-parity sequence 90TC CL BAND(R)$Positive-parity sequence 90TC D CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr. 90TC XA90RU EC DECAY 90TC XB(HI,XNG) 90TC XCNI(40CA,X) 90TC L 0 (8+) 49.2 S 4 90TCX L XREF=BC 90TC cL T$from 809.8|g(t) (1981Ox01). Other: 50.7 s {I63} (2012Ka12, based on 90TC2cL analysis of data in 2008We10). 90TC cL E$tof spectra in Ni({+40}Ca,X) reaction give population fractions of 90TC2cL 89 % {I5} and 11 % {I5} for the ground state and isomer, respectively 90TC3cL (2012Ka12). As high-spin levels are more favorably produced in these 90TC4cL reactions, the ground state is assigned as the J|p=(8+) level. 90TC cL J$from systematics of J|p=8+ states in neighboring odd-odd 90TC2cL {+92}Tc(N=43), {+90}Nb(N=49) and {+88}Nb(N=47) nuclei and supported 90TC3cL by shell-model calculations (1993Ru03). 90TC L 103.70 22 (6+) 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$shell-model calculations predict a J|p=6+ state at 106 keV 90TC2cL (1993Ru03); in {+90}Nb a 6+ isomeric level lies at 123 keV with 90TC3cL T{-1/2} = 60 |ms, which could explain the non-observation of a 90TC4cL depopulating 104-keV transition. 90TC L 144.1 17 1+ 8.7 S 2 90TCX L XREF=AC 90TC2 L %EC+%B+=100 90TC cL E$from Penning-trap mass measurement (2012Ka12): mass excess=-70724.7 90TC2cL keV {I11} for {+90}Tc g.s. and -70580.6 keV {I13} for {+90}Tc isomer 90TC3cL (2012Ka12) 90TC cL T$from two component fit to 944.7|g+948.1|g(t) (1981Ox01). Other: 7.9 90TC2cL s {I2} (1974Ia01). 90TC cL J$theoretical prediction is 2+ but 1+ is suggested from log {Ift} 90TC2cL value to 0+ and 2+ states in {+90}Mo. If g.s. feeding is not properly 90TC3cL determined then 2+ is possible (2012Ka11) 90TC L 152.52 20 (4-) P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$187.8|g from (5-) 90TC G 48.8 1 100 90TC cG E,RI$from {+90}Ru |e decay 90TC L 298.7 1 90TCX L XREF=A 90TC G 154.6 1 100 90TC L 340.33 18 (5-) P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 683.5|g from (7-) 90TC G 187.8 1 100 12 (M1+E2) 0.23 +7-6 0.054 3 90TCS G KC=0.0471 23$LC=0.0057 4$MC=0.00104 7$NC=0.000164 11$OC=1.05E-5 4 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); non-zero value of |d 90TC2cG suggests M1+E2 character 90TC G 236.8 3 10 6 90TC L 494.09 8 (9+) R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$(M1+E2) 494.1|g to (8+) 90TC G 494.1 1 100 (M1+E2) 0.20 +6-5 0.00440 90TCS G KC=0.00386 6$LC=0.000443 7$MC=8.02E-5 13$NC=1.278E-5 20$OC=8.59E-7 13 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); non-zero value of |d 90TC2cG suggests M1+E2 character 90TC L 636.9 90TCX L XREF=A 90TC G 492.8 1 100 90TC cG E,RI$from {+90}Ru |e decay 90TC L 993.72 8 (10+) 1.4 PS 5 R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 993.7|g to (8+) 90TC G 499.7 1 5.5 3 M1+E2 0.3 2 0.0043212 90TCS G KC=0.00379 10$LC=0.000436 14$MC=7.9E-5 3$NC=1.26E-5 4$OC=8.41E-7 17 90TCB G BM1W=0.0060 +31-19 $BE2W=2.3 +40-18 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TC G 993.7 1 100 3 E2 8.39E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000737 11$LC=8.44E-5 12$MC=1.526E-5 22$NC=2.42E-6 4$ 90TCS G OC=1.604E-7 23 90TCB G BE2W=16 +9-4 90TC L 1023.83 15 (7-) P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 608.1|g from (9-) 90TC G 683.5 1 100 E2 0.00210 90TCS G KC=0.00184 3$LC=0.000217 3$MC=3.92E-5 6$NC=6.21E-6 9$OC=3.97E-7 6 90TC L 1485.90 10 (11+) 5 PS LT R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$(M1+E2) 492.1|g to (10+) 90TC G 492.1 1 100 4 (M1+E2) 0.15 4 0.00443 90TCS G KC=0.00389 6$LC=0.000446 7$MC=8.07E-5 12$NC=1.285E-5 19$OC=8.66E-7 13 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); non-zero value of |d 90TC2cG suggests M1+E2 character 90TCB G BM1W GT 0.031 $BE2W GT 1.7 90TC G 991.5 2 10.1 22 [E2] 90TCB G BE2W GT 0.35 90TC L 1613.85 10 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 620.2 4 21 6 90TC G 1119.8 1 100 6 90TC L 1631.93 12 (9-) P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 363.3|g from (11-) 90TC G 608.1 1 100 9 E2 0.00288 90TCS G KC=0.00252 4$LC=0.000300 5$MC=5.43E-5 8$NC=8.57E-6 12$OC=5.41E-7 8 90TC G 1137.8 3 45 11 90TC L 1698.77 13 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 1204.4 4 100 90TC L 1938.56 10 (12+) 2.8 PS 5 R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 944.9|g to (10+) 90TC G 452.6 1 5.8 4 M1+E2 0.00617 90TCS G KC=0.0053 6$LC=0.00063 10$MC=0.000115 17$NC=1.8E-5 3$OC=1.15E-6 10 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W LT 0.0062 $BE2W LT 32 90TC G 944.9 1 100 3 E2 9.42E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000827 12$LC=9.50E-5 14$MC=1.719E-5 24$NC=2.73E-6 4$OC=1.80E-7 3 90TCB G BE2W=10.6 +23-16 90TC L 1995.09 9 (11-) 33 PS 4 P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$D 1001.4|g to (10+), (M1+E2) 191.6|g from (11-) 90TC G 296.3 1 1.7 7 90TC G 363.3 1 6.1 14 [E2] 0.01355 90TCS G KC=0.01174 17$LC=0.001491 21$MC=0.000271 4$NC=4.23E-5 6$OC=2.45E-6 4 90TCB G BE2W=5.1 +14-12 90TC G 381.3 1 5.0 10 90TC G 509.1 1 22.9 21 (E1) 1.51E-3 90TCS G KC=0.001330 19$LC=0.0001500 21$MC=2.71E-5 4$NC=4.30E-6 6$OC=2.85E-7 4 90TCB G BE1W=1.30E-5 +21-18 90TC cG M$D from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 90TC G 1001.4 1 100 3 (E1) 3.53E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000311 5$LC=3.46E-5 5$MC=6.25E-6 9$NC=9.95E-7 14$OC=6.73E-8 10 90TCB G BE1W=7.5E-6 +10-8 90TC cG M$D from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=yes from level scheme 90TC L 2186.48 11 (11-) 13 PS 2 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 554.4|g to (9-) 90TC G 191.6 1 100 6 (M1+E2) 0.20 +30-10 0.050 12 90TCS G KC=0.044 10$LC=0.0053 17$MC=9.6E-4 31$NC=1.52E-4 46$OC=9.8E-6 18 90TCB G BM1W=0.124 +20-27 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TC G 554.4 1 67.3 20 E2 0.00373 90TCS G KC=0.00326 5$LC=0.000392 6$MC=7.10E-5 10$NC=1.119E-5 16$OC=6.98E-7 10 90TCB G BE2W=12.5 +24-18 90TC G 1192.8 5 14 6 [E1] 90TCB G BE1W=1.1E-6 5 90TC L 2247.95 18 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 309.5 2 100 90TC L 2537.40 11 (13+) 0.7 PS LT R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$1051.5|g to (11+), D+Q 598.9|g to (12+) 90TC G 598.9 1 100 3 (M1+E2) 0.07 +10-8 0.00278 90TCS G KC=0.00244 4$LC=0.000278 4$MC=5.03E-5 8$NC=8.01E-6 12$OC=5.43E-7 8 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W GT 0.12 90TC G 1051.5 1 15.9 11 [E2] 90TCB G BE2W GT 3.3 90TC L 2557.88 11 (12-) 0.7 PS LT P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$(M1+E2) 562.8|g to (11-) 90TC G 371.4 1 8.1 7 90TC G 562.8 1 100 3 (M1+E2) 0.08 3 0.00321 90TCS G KC=0.00282 4$LC=0.000322 5$MC=5.82E-5 9$NC=9.28E-6 13$OC=6.28E-7 9 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); non-zero value of |d 90TC2cG suggests M1+E2 character 90TCB G BM1W GT 0.16 $BE2W GT 1.4 90TC L 2600.48 11 (12-) 5.3 PS 8 A 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$(D+Q) 605.2|g to (11-); assignment to negative-parity sequence 90TC G 413.9 1 60 5 D+Q 90TC G 605.2 1 100 5 D+Q 90TC L 2775.61 10 (13-) 2.7 PS 3 P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 780.6|g to (11-) 90TC G 175.0 1 17.4 19 (M1+E2) 0.114 54 90TCS G KC=0.097 45$LC=0.0138 76$MC=0.0025 14$NC=3.9E-4 21$OC=1.97E-5 78 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W LT 0.18 90TC G 217.7 1 100 4 (M1+E2) 0.06 3 0.03416 90TCS G KC=0.0298 5$LC=0.00350 6$MC=0.000636 11$NC=0.0001011 16$OC=6.71E-6 10 90TCB G BM1W=0.42 5 $BE2W=35 +44-25 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TC G 589.3 1 7.4 12 [E2] 90TCB G BE2W=5.0 10 90TC G 780.6 1 39.9 16 E2 1.49E-3 90TCS G KC=0.001310 19$LC=0.0001525 22$MC=2.76E-5 4$NC=4.37E-6 7$OC=2.84E-7 4 90TCB G BE2W=6.5 +9-7 90TC G 837.1 1 15.9 8 [E1] 5.03E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000443 7$LC=4.95E-5 7$MC=8.93E-6 13$NC=1.421E-6 20$OC=9.56E-8 14 90TCB G BE1W=1.82E-5 +24-21 90TC L 2946.74 12 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 409.4 1 74 5 90TC G 698.9 2 37 11 90TC G 1008.5 2 100 21 90TC L 2982.00 12 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 381.3 1 25 5 90TC G 424.2 1 100 9 90TC L 3167.77 11 (14+) 1.0 PS 3 R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 1229.0|g to (12+) 90TC G 221.2 1 9.4 7 (M1+E2) 0.053 21 90TCS G KC=0.045 17$LC=0.0061 28$MC=0.00110 50$NC=1.71E-4 75$OC=9.4E-6 30 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W LT 0.26 90TC G 630.4 1 9 1 (M1+E2) 0.002549 90TCS G KC=0.00222 7$LC=0.000258 13$MC=4.68E-5 24$NC=7.4E-6 4$OC=4.87E-7 9 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W LT 0.011 $BE2W LT 29 90TC G 1229.0 1 100 4 E2 5.38E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000462 7$LC=5.24E-5 8$MC=9.46E-6 14$NC=1.506E-6 21$OC=1.009E-7 15 90TCB G BE2W=7.1 +30-17 90TC L 3201.19 14 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 600.9 2 100 90TC L 3383.26 13 (15+) 1.8 PS 4 R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 845.8|g to (13+) 90TC G 215.5 1 100 4 (M1+E2) 0.06 LE 0.0349 90TCS G KC=0.0306 5$LC=0.00359 6$MC=0.000651 10$NC=0.0001036 15$OC=6.88E-6 10 90TCB G BM1W=0.81 +26-17 $BE2W LT 88 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TC G 845.8 1 47.8 20 E2 1.23E-3 90TCS G KC=0.001075 15$LC=0.0001245 18$MC=2.25E-5 4$NC=3.57E-6 5$OC=2.33E-7 4 90TCB G BE2W=9.6 +27-18 90TC L 3405.73 15 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 238.1 2 26 11 90TC G 868.4 2 100 21 90TC L 3488.64 12 (14-) 1.4 PS LT P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$(E2) 930.6|g to (12-) 90TC G 287.5 1 21.8 23 90TC G 506.5 1 49 6 90TC G 713.1 1 100 3 (M1+E2) 0.14 +9-6 0.00186 90TCS G KC=0.001633 23$LC=0.000185 3$MC=3.35E-5 5$NC=5.34E-6 8$OC=3.63E-7 5 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W GT 0.019 $BE2W GT 0.27 90TC G 930.6 2 33.3 23 (E2) 9.76E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000857 12$LC=9.86E-5 14$MC=1.783E-5 25$NC=2.83E-6 4$OC=1.86E-7 3 90TCB G BE2W GT 3.5 90TC L 3593.08 13 (15+) 1.2 PS 4 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 919.1|g from (17+) 90TC G 187.4 1 41 4 90TC G 210.1 4 11 5 90TC G 425.3 1 100 4 (M1+E2) 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W LT 0.25 90TC L 3672.91 12 (15-) 1.1 PS 3 P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 897.4|g to (13-) 90TC G 184.2 1 43.5 17 (M1+E2) 0.096 44 90TCS G KC=0.082 36$LC=0.0115 61$MC=0.0021 12$NC=3.2E-4 17$OC=1.67E-5 64 90TC cG M$D+Q from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) in (HI,xn|g); |D|p=no from level scheme 90TCB G BM1W LT 1.4 90TC G 505.0 2 5.0 10 [E1] 90TCB G BE1W=7.8E-5 +34-22 90TC G 897.4 1 100 4 E2 1.06E-3 90TCS G KC=0.000933 13$LC=0.0001076 15$MC=1.95E-5 3$NC=3.09E-6 5$OC=2.03E-7 3 90TCB G BE2W=24 +9-5 90TC L 4486.41 15 (16+) R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$1103|g to (15+); assignment to positive parity sequence 90TC G 1103.0 1 100 90TC L 4512.12 14 (17+) 1.5 PS 3 R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 1128.8|g to (15+) 90TC G 919.1 1 32.1 13 E2 1.01E-3 90TCS G KC=0.000882 13$LC=0.0001016 15$MC=1.84E-5 3$NC=2.92E-6 4$OC=1.92E-7 3 90TCB G BE2W=5.8 +15-10 90TC G 1128.8 1 100 3 E2 6.33E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000555 8$LC=6.31E-5 9$MC=1.141E-5 16$NC=1.81E-6 3$OC=1.209E-7 17 90TCB G BE2W=6.5 +17-11 90TC L 4637.12 16 (17-) 1.6 PS 2 P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 964.2|g to (15-) 90TC G 964.2 1 100 E2 8.99E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000789 11$LC=9.06E-5 13$MC=1.639E-5 23$NC=2.60E-6 4$ 90TCS G OC=1.718E-7 24 90TCB G BE2W=17.7 +26-20 90TC L 4864.66 17 (17+) 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$378.1|g to (16+), 1481.9|g to (15+) 90TC G 378.1 1 43 9 90TC G 1481.9 2 100 9 90TC L 5599.18 17 (18+) R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$1087.1|g to (17+); assignment to positive parity sequence 90TC G 1087.1 1 100 90TC L 5651.25 17 (19+) 2.4 PS 1 R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 1139.1|g to (17+) 90TC G 1139.1 1 100 E2 6.21E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000544 8$LC=6.18E-5 9$MC=1.118E-5 16$NC=1.778E-6 25$ 90TCS G OC=1.186E-7 17 90TCB G BE2W=5.13 21 90TC L 5705.92 19 (19-) 1.3 PS 2 P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$E2 1068.8|g to (17-) 90TC G 1068.8 1 100 E2 7.12E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000625 9$LC=7.13E-5 10$MC=1.290E-5 18$NC=2.05E-6 3$OC=1.363E-7 19 90TCB G BE2W=13.0 +24-17 90TC L 5808.21 21 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 209.2 2 100 90TC L 6338.54 24 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 1473.8 2 100 90TC L 6455.27 21 (20+) 0.7 PS LT R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TCF L FLAG=A 90TC cL J$(D+Q) 803.9|g to (19+); assignment to positive parity sequence 90TC G 647.1 1 12.3 14 90TC G 803.9 2 100 4 (D+Q) 90TC L 6884.81 23 (21+) R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$(D+Q) 429.6|g to (20+); assignment to positive parity sequence 90TC G 429.6 1 100 (D+Q) 90TC L 6993.93 21 (21-) 0.8 PS 2 P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TCF L FLAG=A 90TC cL J$E2 1288.0|g to (19-) 90TC G 1288.0 1 100 E2 5.00E-4 90TCS G KC=0.000419 6$LC=4.73E-5 7$MC=8.56E-6 12$NC=1.362E-6 19$OC=9.14E-8 13 90TCB G BE2W=8.3 +28-17 90TC L 7373.4 3 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 1722.2 5 100 90TC L 7439.6 4 (22-) P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$445.7|g to (21-); assignment to negative parity sequence 90TC G 445.7 3 100 90TC L 7678.8 3 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 305.4 2 53 13 90TC G 1340.2 2 100 7 90TC L 8394.4 4 (23-) P 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$954.8|g to (22-); assignment to negative parity sequence 90TC G 954.8 2 100 90TC L 8756.5 3 (22+) R 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC cL J$1872.2|g to (21+), 2300.8|g to (20+) 90TC G 1077.8 5 42 17 90TC G 1872.2 3 100 25 90TC G 2300.8 3 83 17 90TC L 9342.1 3 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 585.7 2 100 12 (D+Q) 90TC G 1663.0 4 30 6 90TC L 9804.2 3 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 462.1 1 100 (D+Q) 90TC L 11246.4 4 90TCX L XREF=B 90TC G 1442.2 2 100 (E2) 90TC 90RU EC DECAY 2004DE40 20NDS 202005 90TC H TYP=FUL$AUT=S. K. Basu, E.A. MCCUTCHAN$CIT=NDS 165, 1 (2020)$ 90TC2 H CUT=1-Mar-2020$ 90TC c 2004De40: {+90}Ru isotope produced in the {+58}Ni({+36}Ar{+10+}, 90TC2c 2n2p) reaction with E=150 MeV. Nuclei recoiling out of the target 90TC3c were stopped and neutralised by 500 mbar of purified Ar gas inside a 90TC4c cell. Reaction products were ionized selectively, according to Z, 90TC5c using two dye lasers tuned to the resonant atomic transitions of the 90TC6c particular element. Laser-ionized nuclei were guided to the LISOL 90TC7c mass separator by a sextupole ion guide. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, 90TC8c |b|g (coin), I|b, isotopic T{-1/2} with two HPGe detectors arranged 90TC9c in a compact configuration around |b-sensitive plastic |DE detectors. 90TC c 1991Zh29, 1994Zh26: Enriched {+58}Ni({+35}Cl,2np) E({+35}Cl)=112-132 90TC2c MeV; Si(Li), Compton-suppressed HPGe and neutron detectors; Wheel 90TC3c transportation system; Measured |s(E({+58}Ni), E|g) and |g(t); 90TC4c Identification of {+90}Ru decay based on comparison of |s(E({+58}Ni)) 90TC5c with cascade calculations; 37 |g-rays identified in coincidence with 90TC6c Tc K|a| x ray by 1994Zh26 but not placed in a decay scheme. 90TC cE LOGFT$Values should be regarded as lower limits, as there is a large 90TC2cE difference between the allowed energy for decay (5.8 MeV) and the 90TC3cE highest observed excited level (0.6 MeV). 90TC cL E$From E|g, except where noted. 90TC cL J$From Adopted Levels 90TC cG $2004De40 confirm only two |g rays out of 37 |g rays reported by 90TC2cG 1994Zh26. 90TC cG E,RI$From 2004De20. 90RU P 0.0 0+ 11.7 S 9 5841 4 90TC N 0.42 9 1 90TC cN NR$from |SI|g(to 144-keV isomer)=51 {I11}, based on 144-keV isomer 90TC2cN I(|e+|b{++}) feeding of 49 {I11} from 2004De20 derived from a 90TC3cN measurement of 511-keV annihilation intensity. 90TC PN 3 90TC L 144.1 17 1+ 8.7 S 2 90TC cL E,T$from the Adopted Levels. 90TC E 48 111.3 3 4.67 11 49 11 90TCS E EAV=2224.2 20$CK=0.02316 6$CL=0.002806 7$CM+=0.0006525 1 90TC cE TI$isomer feeding was determined by 2004De20 from measurement of 90TC2cE 511-keV annihilation intensity. 2004De20 do not provide value for 90TC3cE I|g(511|g). 90TC L 298.7 17 90TC G 154.6 1 100 90TC cG E$strong |g-ray identified in coincidence with Tc K|a| x ray but not 90TC2cG placed in a decay scheme by 1994Zh26. 90TC E 41 5 1.2 1 4.67 7 42 5 90TCS E EAV=2149.8 20$CK=0.02544 7$CL=0.003082 8$CM+=0.0007167 1 90TC L 636.9 17 90TC G 492.8 1 21 4 90TC cG E$strong |g-ray identified in coincidence with Tc K|a| x ray but not 90TC2cG placed in a decay scheme by 1994Zh26. 90TC E 9 2 0.3 1 5.19 11 9 2 90TCS E EAV=1987.4 20$CK=0.03155 9$CL=0.003825 11$CM+=0.0008894 2 90TC (HI,XNG) 1993RU03 20NDS 202005 90TC H TYP=FUL$AUT=S. K. Basu, E.A. MCCUTCHAN$CIT=NDS 165, 1 (2020)$ 90TC2 H CUT=1-Mar-2020$ 90TC c 1993Ru03, 1993Ka24: 99.98% enriched {+58}Ni target; measured |g rays 90TC2c using the OSIRIS array of 12 Compton-suppressed HPGe detectors. 90TC3c Reactions: {+58}Ni({+36}Ar,3pn|g), E=149 MeV. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g 90TC4c coin, DCO ratios; {+58}Ni({+35}Cl,2pn|g), E=120 MeV. Measured 90TC5c |g|g(|q) for |q=0|' to 90|', angular correlation coefficients, n|g|g 90TC6c coin. 90TC c 1994Ru13: 99.8% enriched {+58}Ni target. Measured level half-lives 90TC2c using the recoil distance doppler-shift method (RDDS). Data were also 90TC3c analyzed using the differential decay curve method (DDCM). Reactions: 90TC4c {+58}Ni({+36}Ar,3pn), E=140 MeV; {+58}Ni({+35}Cl,2pn), E=120 MeV. 90TC c 1993Ka24: general treatment of DCO ratio analysis applied to a few 90TC2c transitions in {+90}Tc. 90TC c 1993Zh16: 99.8% enriched {+58}Ni({+35}Cl,2pn) reaction, E=124 MeV; 90TC2c measured E|g, I|g, n|g|g coin, DCO ratios; used an array of five 90TC3c Compton-suppressed HPGe detectors. 90TC c Others: 1992CrZY, 1992LiZT, 1992WeZR, 1993RuZV. 90TC cL E$Deduced by evaluators from a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies. 90TC cL J$Spin and parity assignments for excited states are based on |g-ray 90TC2cL multi-polarities, and on the assumption that |g-ray deexcitation 90TC3cL takes place through yrast states. Spin and parities between 90TC4cL parenthesis are based on shell-model calculations which use a 90TC5cL configuration space of only the 2p1/2 and 1g9/2 orbitals for protons 90TC6cL and neutrons (1993Ru03). 90TC cL T$Recoil distance Doppler-shift method (1994Ru13) 90TC cL T(A)$Effective half-life, not corrected for feeding (1994Ru13). 90TC cL SEQ(P)$Negative-parity sequence 90TC cL SEQ(R)$Positive-parity sequence 90TC cG E,RI$From {+58}Ni({+36}Ar,3pn|g), ({+35}Cl,2pn|g) (1993Ru03). 90TC cG M,MR$From |g(|q) in {+58}Ni({+35}Cl,2pn|g) and DCO ratios in 90TC2cG {+58}Ni({+36}Ar,3pn|g) (1993Ru03). 90TC PN 5 90TC L 0.0 8+ R 90TC cL J$based on systematics of J|p=8+ ground states in neighboring odd-odd 90TC2cL {+92}Tc(N=49), {+90}Nb(N=49) and {+88}Nb(N=47) nuclei. Shell-model 90TC3cL calculations predict J|p=8+ for the g.s. of {+90}Tc. 90TC L 103.70 22 (6+) 90TC cL J$shell-model calculations predict a J|p=6+ state at 106 keV. 90TC G 104 S 90TC L 152.52 21 4- P 90TC G 48.8 1 90TC L 340.34 18 5- P 90TC G 187.8 1 51 6 D+Q 0.23 +7-6 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.55 {I2}, A{-4}=0.05 {I3}; R(DCO)<1. 90TC G 236.8 3 5 3 90TC L 494.09 8 9+ R 90TC G 494.1 1 130 5 D+Q 0.20 +6-5 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.60 {I4}, A{-4}=0.16 {I5}; R(DCO)=0.40 {I14}. 90TC L 993.72 8 10+ 1.4 PS 5 R 90TC G 499.7 1 55 3 D+Q 0.3 2 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.59 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I8}; R(DCO)<1. 90TC G 993.7 1 1.00E3 3 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.31 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2}; R(DCO)=1.02 {I7}. 90TC L 1023.84 16 7- P 90TC G 683.5 1 53 3 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.31 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8}; R(DCO)=1.07 {I13}. 90TC L 1485.90 10 11+ 5 PS LT R 90TC G 492.1 1 139 5 D+Q 0.15 4 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.51 {I3}, A{-4}=0.10 {I3}; R(DCO)=0.50 {I7}. 90TC G 991.5 2 14 3 90TC L 1613.85 11 (10+) 90TC G 620.2 4 7 2 90TC G 1119.8 1 33 2 90TC L 1631.94 12 9- P 90TC G 608.1 1 53 5 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6}; R(DCO)=0.82 {I18}. 90TC G 1137.8 3 24 6 90TC L 1698.78 14 (10+) 90TC G 1204.4 4 9 3 90TC L 1938.56 10 12+ 2.8 PS 5 R 90TC G 452.6 1 32 2 D+Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.35 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I16}. 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.41 {I11} (1993Zh16) 90TC G 944.9 1 554 17 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.30 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I3}; R(DCO)=0.95 {I6}. 90TC L 1995.09 10 11- 33 PS 4 P 90TC G 296.3 1 7 3 90TC G 363.3 1 26 6 90TC G 381.3 1 21 4 90TC G 509.1 1 97 9 D 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.38 {I8}, A{-4}=0.05 {I9}; R(DCO)=1.10 {I23}. 90TC G 1001.4 1 423 14 D 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.36 {I3}, A{-4}=0.08 {I3}; R(DCO)=0.59 {I6}. 90TC L 2186.48 11 11- 13 PS 2 90TC G 191.6 1 49 3 D+Q 0.20 +30-10 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.31 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}; R(DCO)=1.13 {I12}. 90TC G 554.4 1 33 1 Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.85 {I7} 90TC G 1192.8 5 7 3 90TC L 2247.95 18 (12+) 90TC G 309.5 2 9 2 90TC L 2537.40 11 13+ 0.7 PS LT R 90TC G 598.9 1 182 6 D+Q 0.07 +10-8 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.37 {I4}, A{-4}=0.08 {I4}; R(DCO)=0.53 {I7}. 90TC G 1051.5 1 29 2 90TC L 2557.88 11 12- 0.7 PS LT P 90TC G 371.4 1 24 2 90TC G 562.8 1 295 9 D+Q 0.08 3 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.35 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2}; R(DCO)=0.47 {I7}. 90TC L 2600.49 11 12- 5.3 PS 8 A 90TC G 413.9 1 34 3 (D+Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)<1 90TC G 605.2 1 57 3 D+Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.64 {I12} 90TC L 2775.61 11 13- 2.7 PS 3 P 90TC G 175.0 1 45 5 (D+Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)<1 90TC G 217.7 1 258 10 D+Q 0.06 3 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.33 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I2}; R(DCO)=0.35 {I7}. 90TC G 589.3 1 19 3 90TC G 780.6 1 103 4 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.39 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I6}; R(DCO)=0.92 {I15}. 90TC G 837.1 1 41 2 90TC L 2946.74 13 (13+) 90TC G 409.4 1 14 1 90TC G 698.9 2 7 2 90TC G 1008.5 2 19 4 90TC L 2982.01 12 (13-) 90TC G 381.3 1 16 3 90TC G 424.2 1 65 6 90TC L 3167.77 12 14+ 1.0 PS 3 R 90TC G 221.2 1 27 2 D+Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.52 {I11}, A{-4}=0.19 {I14}; R(DCO)<1. 90TC G 630.4 1 26 3 D+Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.44 {I13} 90TC G 1229.0 1 288 10 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.31 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4}; R(DCO)=1.00 {I8}. 90TC L 3201.19 15 (13-) 90TC G 600.9 2 24 5 90TC L 3383.26 13 15+ 1.8 PS 4 R 90TC G 215.5 1 249 10 D+Q 0.06 LE 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=0.08 {I3}; R(DCO)=0.37 {I6}. 90TC G 845.8 1 119 5 Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=1.15 {I12}. 90TC L 3405.73 15 (14+) 90TC G 238.1 2 5 2 90TC G 868.4 2 19 4 90TC L 3488.65 12 14- 1.4 PS LT P 90TC G 287.5 1 19 2 90TC G 506.5 1 43 5 90TC G 713.1 1 87 3 D+Q 0.14 +9-6 90TC cG M$A{-2}=-0.50 {I4}, A{-4}=0.10 {I4}; R(DCO)=0.39 {I10}. 90TC G 930.6 2 29 2 (Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.76 {I18} 90TC L 3593.08 14 15+ 1.2 PS 3 90TC G 187.4 1 34 3 90TC G 210.1 4 9 4 90TC G 425.3 1 83 3 D+Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.62 {I7} 90TC L 3672.91 13 15- 1.1 PS 3 P 90TC G 184.2 1 175 7 D+Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.37 {I9} 90TC G 505.0 2 20 4 90TC G 897.4 1 402 14 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3}; R(DCO)=0.99 {I19}. 90TC L 4486.42 16 (16+) R 90TC G 1103.0 1 17 2 90TC L 4512.12 14 17+ 1.5 PS 3 R 90TC G 919.1 1 77 3 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.30 {I12}, A{-4}=0.08 {I13}; R(DCO)=1.28 {I11}. 90TC G 1128.8 1 240 8 Q 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.98 {I9} 90TC L 4637.12 16 17- 1.6 PS 2 P 90TC G 964.2 1 443 12 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.30 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I2}; R(DCO)=1.02 {I7}. 90TC L 4864.66 17 (17+) 90TC G 378.1 1 10 2 90TC G 1481.9 2 23 2 90TC L 5599.18 17 (18+) R 90TC G 1087.1 1 22 2 90TC L 5651.25 17 19+ 2.4 PS 1 R 90TC G 1139.1 1 200 7 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.25 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}; R(DCO)=0.96 {I10}. 90TC L 5705.93 19 19- 1.3 PS 2 P 90TC G 1068.8 1 286 9 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I4}; R(DCO)=1.02 {I10}. 90TC L 5808.21 21 (19+) 90TC G 209.2 2 20 4 90TC L 6338.54 24 (19+) 90TC G 1473.8 2 19 2 90TC L 6455.27 21 (20+) 0.7 PS LT R 90TCF L FLAG=A 90TC G 647.1 1 17 2 90TC G 803.9 2 138 6 (D+Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.52 {I18} 90TC L 6884.81 23 (21+) 90TC G 429.6 1 39 4 (D+Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.73 {I10} 90TC L 6993.94 22 21- 0.8 PS 2 P 90TCF L FLAG=A 90TC G 1288.0 1 169 6 Q 90TC cG M$A{-2}=0.27 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I4}; R(DCO)=0.87 {I14}. 90TC L 7373.4 3 (20+) 90TC G 1722.2 5 11 3 90TC L 7439.6 4 (22-) P 90TC G 445.7 3 40 2 90TC L 7678.8 3 (21+) 90TC G 305.4 2 8 2 90TC G 1340.2 2 15 1 90TC L 8394.4 5 (23-) P 90TC G 954.8 2 28 3 90TC L 8756.5 3 (22+) R 90TC G 1077.8 5 5 2 90TC G 1872.2 3 12 3 90TC G 2300.8 3 10 2 90TC L 9342.1 3 (23+) 90TC G 585.7 2 33 4 (D+Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.73 {I14} 90TC G 1663.0 4 10 2 90TC L 9804.2 4 (24+) 90TC G 462.1 1 36 4 (D+Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=0.65 {I14} 90TC L 11246.4 4 (26+) 90TC G 1442.2 2 23 4 (Q) 90TC cG M$R(DCO)=1.05 {I21} 90TC NI(40CA,X) 2012KA12 20NDS 202005 90TC H TYP=FUL$AUT=S. K. Basu, E.A. MCCUTCHAN$CIT=NDS 165, 1 (2020)$ 90TC2 H CUT=1-Mar-2020$ 90TC c Determination of the energy of the low-spin isomeric state 90TC c 2012Ka12: {+90}Tc isotope was produced through the Ni({+40}Ca,X) at 90TC2c E=210 MeV using HIGISOL facility via JYFLTRAP mass measurement. 90TC3c Measured isomer excitation energy from difference in mass excess. 90TC4c Deduced T{-1/2} of high-spin ground state analyzing data from 2008We10 90TC L 0 (8+) 50.7 S 63 90TC cL T,J$from 2012Ka12 based on analysis of |b(t) data from 2008We10 90TC L 144.1 17 (1+) 8.7 S 2 90TC cL T$from the Adopted Levels 90TC cL E$from Penning-trap mass measurement (2012Ka12): mass excess=-70724.7 90TC2cL keV {I11} for {+90}Tc g.s. and -70580.6 keV {I13} for {+90}Tc isomer 90TC3cL (2012Ka12). Fit to tof spectra yields fractions of lower-mass and and 90TC4cL higher mass state as 89 % {I5} and 11 % {I5}, respectively 90TC5cL (2012Ka12). As the high-spin state is more favorably produced in the 90TC6cL reaction utilized in 2012Ka12, the ground state is most likely the 90TC7cL high-spin level and the isomer the low-spin level. 90TC cL J$from the Adopted Levels.