186OS 186W(4HE,4NG):XUNDL-7 2022MD01 202306 186OS c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2022Md01: 186OS2c Phys Rev C 106, 044325 (2022) 186OS c Compiled by J. Chen (FRIB, MSU), February 16, 2023 186OS c 2022Md01: E=48 MeV {+4}He beam was produced from the iThemba LABS 186OS2c Separated-Sector Cyclotron (SSC). Target was a stack of four 100 186OS3c |mg/cm{+2} {+186}W layers. |g rays were detected with the AFRODITE 186OS4c spectrometer consisting of 11 clover HPGe clover detectors. Measured 186OS5c E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g|g(|q), |g(lin pol). Deduced levels, band 186OS6c structures, J, |p, |g-ray multipolarities. Comparisons with theoretical 186OS7c calculations. 186OS cG $Angular Distribution ratio is R{-AD}=I|g(135|')/I|g(90|') for each 186OS2cG transition, with I|g(135|') and I|g(90|') obtained by gating on all 186OS3cG other transitions. Expected R{-AD} are ~0.8 and ~1.2 for pure stretched 186OS4cG dipole (|DJ=1) and quadrupole (|DJ=2) transitions, respectively, with a 186OS5cG gate on a quadrupole transition (2022Md01). Note that R{-AD}|?1.2 is 186OS6cG also consistent with |DJ=0 for some cases. 186OS cG $For polarization asymmetry A{-p} under comments, positive and negative 186OS2cG values indicate electric and magnetic nature, respectively. 186OS cG E,RI$From 2022Md01. Based on observed |g-ray spectra and a general 186OS2cG statement in 2022MdAA that measured |g-ray energies have uncertainties 186OS3cG of 0.3 keV and up to 0.5 keV for the weaker and double transitions and 186OS4cG , the compiler has assigned |DE|g for each E|g as follows: 0.3 keV for 186OS5cG I|g>=1.0 and 0.5 keV for I|g<1.0. 186OS cG E(X)$Newly identified transition in 2022Md01 186OS cG M$Deduced by the compiler based on measured |g|g(|q) (R{-AD} ratios) 186OS2cG and |g(lin pol) (A{-p}) as given under comments, with |DJ=1 for Mult=D 186OS3cG and |DJ=2 for Mult=Q and E2. 186OS cG M(W)$R{-AD} is too low for pure non-stretched dipole and suggests 186OS2cG considerable E2 admixture (2022Md01) 186OS cG $Previously reported transitions of 143 keV, 161 keV and 261 keV 186OS2cG placed as intraband transitions in the K=2 band, were not observed. 186OS3cG 2022Md01 state that if the transitions exist, their data suggest 186OS4cG their branchings are less than 1%. 186OS cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies (by compiler), unless 186OS2cL otherwise noted 186OS cL E(Y)$Newly proposed level in 2022Md01 186OS cL E(Z)$Not seen in 2022Md01; quoted in Fig.1 by the authors as previously 186OS2cL known levels. 186OS cL J$As given in 2022Md01, based on measured |g|g(|q), |g(lin pol) and 186OS2cL band assignments. 186OS CL BAND(A)$Band based on 1208.2, 2+ level. K=0 186OS CL BAND(D)$Band based on 3439.6, 14+ level 186OS CL BAND(C)$Band based on 3816.2, 15+ level 186OS CL BAND(B)$Band based on 2562.8, 10+ level. K=10 186OS CL BAND(E)$g.s. band. K=0 186OS CL BAND(F)$Band based on 767.5, 2+ level, |a=0. K=2 186OS CL BAND(f)$Band based on 767.5, 2+ level, |a=1. K=2 186OS CL BAND(G)$Band based on 1351.9, 4+ level. K=4 186OS CL BAND(H)$Band based on 1628.6, 5- level. K=5 186OS CL BAND(I)$Band based on 1774.6, 7- level. K=7 186OS CL BAND(J)$Band based on 2165.6, 9- level. K=9 186OS PN 5 186OS L 0 0+ E 186OS L 137.06 23 2+ E 186OS G 137.0 3 62 3 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.10 {I6} 186OS L 433.99 27 4+ E 186OS G 296.9 3 100 3 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.17 {I4}, A{-P}=0.05 {I2} 186OS L 767.54 23 2+ F 186OS G 630.4 3 15 1 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.5 {I6} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} is also consistent with |DJ=0 186OS G 767.6 3 17 1 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.5 {I6} 186OS L 868.74 29 6+ E 186OS G 434.8 3 70 3 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.17 {I5}, A{-P}=0.03 {I2} 186OS L 910.34 28 3+ f 186OS G 476.3 3 1.9 2 186OS G 773.3 3 17 1 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.73 {I15} 186OS L 1070.40 26 4+ F 186OS G 302.7 3 2.2 4 186OS G 636.4 3 14.2 5 W 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.8 {I3} 186OS G 933.4 3 11.9 6 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.2 {I3} 186OS L 1208.0 5 2+ A 186OS G 1070.7 5 0.41 15 186OS L 1275.48 29 5+ f 186OS G 365.1 3 2.4 2 186OS G 406.9 3 1.4 2 186OS G 841.5 3 10.6 4 (D) 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.0 {I2} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} indicates D or Q; D from level scheme 186OS L 1351.91 27 4+ G 186OS G 281.5 3 3.5 8 186OS G 441.6 3 10.8 4 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.9 {I2} 186OS G 584.5 3 24.8 8 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.1 {I1} 186OS G 917.9 5 0.5 1 186OS G 1214.9 5 0.8 1 186OS L 1420.64 33 8+ E 186OS G 551.9 3 37 2 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.19 {I6}, A{-P}=0.07 {I3} 186OS L 1460.8 4 4+ A 186OS G 252.5 5 0.08 4 186OS G 1026.7 5 0.5 2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.4 {I3} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} is also consistent with |DJ=0 186OS G 1323.8 5 0.4 1 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.6 {I7} 186OS L 1491.14 31 6+ F 186OS G 420.8 3 4.3 2 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.2 {I2} 186OS G 622.4 3 4.3 3 W 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.8 {I3} 186OS G 1057.1 3 3.9 3 (Q) 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.0 {I2} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} indicates D or Q; Q from level scheme 186OS L 1559.59 29 5+ G 186OS G 207.8 3 1.7 2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I2} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} indicates a pure quadrupole, but |DJ=1 186OS G 489.0 3 2.5 2 186OS G 649.2 3 2.9 2 186OS G 1125.6 5 0.4 1 X 186OS L 1628.65 29 5- H 186OS G 276.7 3 43.5 13 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.88 {I8} 186OS G 353.2 3 7.4 3 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.08 {I9} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} is also consistent with |DJ=0 186OS G 558.3 3 11.7 4 186OS G 759.8 3 12.3 4 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.9 {I1} 186OS G 1194.7 5 0.16 7 X 186OS L 1750.46 33 7+ f 186OS G 329.9 5 0.3 1 X ? 186OS G 475.1 3 2.7 2 186OS G 881.6 3 2.8 2 M1 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.75 {I14}, A{-P}=-0.08 {I6} 186OS L 1771.68 34 6- H 186OS G 143.0 3 9.7 3 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.7 {I1} 186OS G 212.0 5 0.9 2 X 186OS G 903.0 3 1.3 2 186OS L 1774.7 4 7- I 186OS G 146.0 3 27.4 9 186OS G 906.1 5 0.5 1 186OS L 1783.82 32 6+ G 186OSF L FLAG=Y 186OS G 224.2 5 0.9 2 X 186OS G 432.0 3 2.7 2 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.1 {I2} 186OS G 508.3 5 0.6 3 X 186OS G 713.4 5 0.7 4 X 186OS L 1812.6 4 6+ A 186OS G 351.6 5 0.8 1 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.2 {I2} 186OS G 943.8 5 0.7 1 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.0 {I2} 186OS cG M$R{-AD} is also consistent with |DJ=0 186OS G 1378.8 5 0.3 1 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.1 {I3} 186OS L 1938.8 7- H 186OSF L FLAG=Z 186OS L 1968.3 4 8- I 186OS G 193.7 3 35.6 11 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.7 {I1} 186OS L 2014.7 4 7+ G 186OSF L FLAG=Y 186OS G 231.0 5 1.3 6 X ? 186OS G 455.0 3 2.8 2 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I4} 186OS L 2014.84 35 8+ F 186OS G 523.7 3 3.3 2 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I3}, A{-P}=0.05 {I3} 186OS G 594.1 3 X ? 186OS G 1146.1 5 0.4 1 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I5} 186OS L 2067.9 4 10+ E 186OS G 647.3 3 26 1 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.22 {I6}, A{-P}=0.04 {I2} 186OS L 2133.6 8- H 186OSF L FLAG=Z 186OS L 2165.6 4 9- J 186OS G 197.3 3 23.6 7 186OS L 2187.8 6 9- I 186OS L 2257.9 4 8+ A 186OS G 445.2 3 1.6 2 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I2} 186OS G 837.4 5 0.3 1 X 186OS L 2301.6 5 8+ G 186OSF L FLAG=Y 186OS G 517.8 3 2.1 2 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.1 {I4} 186OS L 2316.9 4 9+ f 186OS G 566.5 3 3.5 2 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I3} 186OS G 896.2 3 1.3 2 M1 X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.84 {I14}, A{-P}=-0.14 {I8} 186OS L 2431.1 5 10- J 186OS G 243.3 3 1.3 6 186OS G 265.5 3 7.5 3 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.6 {I1} 186OS G 462.8 3 4.3 3 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.4 {I5} 186OS L 2435.1 10- I 186OSF L FLAG=Z 186OS L 2562.7 4 10+ B 186OS G 397.2 3 14.5 5 E1 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.84 {I5}, A{-P}=0.05 {I2} 186OS G 1141.9 5 0.30 5 186OS L 2624.2 4 10+ F 186OS G 609.2 3 2.4 2 Q 186OSF G FL=2014.84 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I2} 186OS G 1203.8 5 0.24 7 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.4 {I6} 186OS L 2714.5 11- J 186OSF L FLAG=Z 186OS L 2781.0 4 12+ E 186OS G 713.1 3 18 1 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.23 {I6}, A{-P}=0.04 {I2} 186OS L 2787.5 5 10+ A 186OS G 529.6 3 1.4 2 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I2} 186OS G 719.7 5 0.3 1 X 186OS L 2805.7 4 11+ B 186OS G 243.0 3 9.4 3 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.58 {I6} 186OS L 2955.0 4 11+ f 186OS G 638.0 3 2.6 2 186OS G 887.2 5 0.41 6 D X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.8 {I2} 186OS L 3006.6 12- J 186OSF L FLAG=Z 186OS L 3038.6 4 12+ B 186OS G 232.9 3 2.9 3 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.63 {I9} 186OS G 257.6 5 0.6 1 186OS G 476.0 5 0.7 1 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.22 {I13} 186OS G 970.7 3 1.0 1 186OS L 3293.4 5 13+ B 186OS G 254.8 3 2.6 2 D 186OS cG $R{-AD}=0.68 {I9} 186OS G 487.7 3 1.7 2 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.31 {I9}, A{-P}=0.03 {I3} 186OS L 3295.2 5 12+ F 186OS G 671.0 3 1.24 9 186OS L 3396.4 7 12+ A 186OSF L FLAG=Y 186OS G 608.9 5 0.8 2 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.4 {I2} 186OS L 3439.6 5 14+ D 186OS G 146.0 5 0.05 4 186OS G 401.0 3 1.1 2 186OS G 658.7 3 9.1 8 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.21 {I6}, A{-P}=0.04 {I2} 186OS L 3557.7 5 14+ E 186OS G 776.7 3 2.9 2 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.16 {I8}, A{-P}=0.06 {I4} 186OS L 3626.8 7 13+ f 186OS G 671.8 5 0.98 8 186OS L 3816.2 5 15+ C 186OS G 258.5 5 0.4 1 186OS G 376.4 5 0.9 1 186OS G 522.9 3 2.0 2 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.32 {I9} 186OS L 3934.5 5 16+ D 186OS G 118.3 5 0.4 1 186OS G 494.8 3 8.1 5 E2 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.24 {I7}, A{-P}=0.07 {I3} 186OS L 3971.7 7 14+ F 186OSF L FLAG=Y 186OS G 676.5 5 0.51 5 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.2 {I2} 186OS L 4318.3 8 15+ f 186OSF L FLAG=Y 186OS G 691.5 5 0.50 5 Q X 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I3} 186OS L 4413.4 6 17+ C 186OS G 597.2 3 2.5 5 186OS L 4504.2 6 18+ D 186OS G 569.7 3 3.4 5 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.05 {I16} 186OS L 5105.9 6 19+ C 186OS G 692.5 3 2.0 5 186OS L 5167.0 7 20+ D 186OS G 662.8 3 1.7 4 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.25 {I14} 186OS L 5914.4 8 22+ D 186OS G 747.4 5 0.5 2 Q 186OS cG $R{-AD}=1.3 {I7} 186OS 186OS A:T:XUNDL-8 2024Be17 202410 186OS c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2024Be17: 186OS2c Eur. Phys. J A 60, 150 (2024) 186OS c Compiled by E.A. McCutchan (NNDC, BNL), October 8, 2024 186OS c Metal osmium sample with 99.999% purity in the form of four 186OS2c ingots with a total mass of 173 g. Measured E|g, I|g using 186OS3c three ultra-low background HPGe detectors at LNGS. 186OS4c Measurement time was 5 years. Deduced limit for half-life. 186OS L 0.0 4.8E17 Y GE 186OS cL T$for decay to the 2+, 100.1-keV level in {+182}W. 186OS2cL Other: |> 6.0 |* 10{+18} y for decay to the 4+, 329.4-keV level 186OS3cL in {+182}W.