35S 24MG(14N,3PG):XUNDL-1 2014AY01 201401 35S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2014Ay01: 35S 2c Phys Rev C 89, 014310 (2014) 35S c Compiled by B. Singh (McMaster), Jan 15, 2014 35S c E({+14}N)=40 MeV. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g(|q), |g|g(|q)(ADO), 35S 2c level lifetimes by DSAM using GASP array of 40 Compton-suppressed HPGe 35S 3c detectors at LNL, XTU-tandem accelerator facility at Legnaro. Deduced 35S 4c high-spin levels, J, |p. Comparison with large-scale shell model 35S 5c calculations 35S cG $R{-ADO}=(I|g(34|')+I|g(146|')/2I|g(90|'); expected ratios are 0.8 for 35S 2cG stretched dipoles and 1.4 for stretched quadrupoles or |DJ=0, dipoles 35S cG M,MR$From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) data (2014Ay01) 35S cL E$From least-squares fit (by compiler) to E|g data 35S cL J$From |g(|q) and |g|g(|q) data for levels of J>7/2 (2014Ay01); lower 35S 2cL J|p asignments are from Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 35S cL T$From DSAM and line-shape (2014Ay01), unless otherwise stated 35S cL T(E)$From Adopted Levels in ENSDF database 35S CL BAND(A)$|DJ=1 sequence based on 7/2- 35S CL BAND(B)$Sequence based on 3/2+ 35S PN 5 35S L 0.0 3/2+ B 35S L 1572.4 3 1/2+ 2.3 PS 4 E 35S G 1572.4 3 1.4 4 M1 35S 2 G BM1=0.004 1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.88 {I10} 35S L 1991.37 19 7/2- A 35S G 1991.3 2 100.0 57 M2+E3 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.45 {I15} 35S L 2347.88 25 3/2- 35S G 775.4 4 1.4 2 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.68 {I14} 35S G 2347.8 3 3.8 3 35S L 2717.1 4 5/2+ 69 FS 24 E 35S G 2717.0 4 0.5 3 [M1] 35S 2 G BM1=0.028 10 35S L 3594.7 3 7/2+ B 35S G 877.6 5 0.4 1 35S G 3594.7 7 4.3 4 E2 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.36 {I16} 35S L 3816.04 24 9/2- 0.28 PS 3 A 35S G 1824.6 2 24.9 15 M1+E2 +0.55 9 35S 2 G BM1=0.018 4 $ BE2=0.0023 8 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.58 {I5} 35S 2 G A2=+0.48 4 $ A4=+0.08 6 35S L 3886.4 4 5/2+ 35S G 1538.4 8 0.5 2 35S G 1894.9 4 2.1 3 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.69 {I10} 35S L 4023.2 3 11/2- 0.32 PS 3 A 35S G 207.0 5 0.4 2 35S G 2031.8 3 67.7 38 E2 35S 2 G BE2=0.0051 5 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.41 {I10} 35S 2 G A2=+0.29 4 $ A4=-0.10 6 35S L 4822.9 3 9/2+ 35S G 1006.8 2 0.8 1 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.37 {I11} 35S G 1228.1 3 1.1 1 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.78 {I9} 35S G 2831.4 9 0.4 1 35S L 4899.7 4 9/2+ 35S G 1304.8 12 0.6 2 35S G 2908.3 5 1.1 2 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.74 {I14} 35S L 5010.2 3 11/2- 0.45 PS 8 35S G 986.9 3 4.4 2 M1 35S 2 G BM1=0.064 12 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.30 {I13} 35S G 3018.5 7 1.9 2 E2 35S 2 G BE2=0.00015 3 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.35 {I34} 35S L 5412.2 4 9/2+ 35S G 1389.0 4 3.9 4 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.79 {I11} 35S G 1525.7 8 0.6 1 35S G 3420.6 9 1.1 1 35S L 5877.5 3 11/2+ B 35S G 465.3 3 1.2 1 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.71 {I9} 35S G 867.3 3 1.9 1 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.36 {I20} 35S G 977.8 3 1.6 1 M1+E2 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.43 {I16} 35S G 1054.5 3 3.0 2 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.72 {I11} 35S G 1854.4 4 1.7 1 35S G 2061.5 3 3.8 2 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.65 {I9} 35S G 2282.9 4 2.6 1 35S G 3886.0 13 0.3 1 35S L 6299.4 4 11/2+ 35S G 887.0 7 0.4 1 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.6 {I3} 35S G 2275.9 6 1.0 2 35S G 2483.6 8 0.9 2 35S L 6352.2 6 13/2- 0.05 PS 1 A 35S G 2329.5 9 3.6 7 M1 35S 2 G BM1=0.04 1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.8 {I3} 35S G 2535.8 11 1.8 2 E2 35S 2 G BM1=0.0037 9 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.5 {I5} 35S L 7179.8 3 15/2+ 3.1 PS 12 B 35S G 827.8 6 0.3 1 35S G 880.2 4 0.8 1 35S G 1302.2 2 13.5 8 E2 35S 2 G BE2=0.0045 17 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.40 {I5} 35S 2 G A2=+0.27 5 $ A4=-0.07 5 35S L 8023.7 9 17/2+ 0.15 PS 4 B 35S G 843.9 8 1.6 2 M1 35S 2 G BM1=0.44 12 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.8 {I3} 35S 26MG(18O,2ANG):XUNDL-2 2021GO09 202105 35S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2021Go09: 35S 2c Phys Rev C 103, 034327 (2021) 35S c Compiled by B. Singh (McMaster), March 30, 2021 35S c 2021Go09: E({+18}O)=80 MeV. Measured E|g, I|g, |a|g|g-coin, 35S 2c |g|g(|q)(ADO). Two experiments were carried out using the same 35S 3c reaction and beam energy: 1. at the JAEA tandem accelerator facility, 35S 4c using GEMINI-II array with BGO Compton suppressor shields and 14 Ge 35S 5c detectors; 2. at the ALTO-Tandem accelerator facility, using ORGAM 35S 6c array with BGO anti-Compton suppressors, and 13 Ge detectors. In both 35S 7c the experiments, a 4|p silicon detector array of 170 |mm-thick 35S 8c pentagonal-shape detectors was used for |a particle detection. 35S 9c Comparison with large-scale shell-model calculations, using the 35S Ac SDPF-MSD4 interaction 35S cG $R{-ADO}=(I|g{-1}(47|'),|g{-2} gated by all )/2I|g{-1}(86|'), |g{-2} 35S 2cG gated by all); expected ratios are |?0.8 for stretched dipoles and 35S 3cG |?1.0 for stretched quadrupoles 35S cG M$As given in 2021Go09, based on |g|g(|q)(ADO) data, and as implied 35S 2cG |DJ|p of levels involved. 35S cG M(x)$Compiler's note: no experimental supporting evidence, or 35S 2cG literature source reference given by 2021Go09 for confirmed 35S 3cG multipolarity assignment 35S cL E$Deduced by compiler from From least-squares fit to E|g values 35S cL J$From |g|g(|q)(ADO) ratios in this work for a few levels, while 35S 2cL most J|p assignments are taken by 2021Go09 from 2014Ay01 35S 3cL (Phys. Rev. C89, 014310) 35S cL SEQ(A)$|g cascade based on the g.s. 35S PN 5 35S L 0.0 3/2+ A 35S L 1990.6 4 7/2- A 35S G 1990.5 4 100 M2+E3 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.30 {I8} 35S L 3594.3 7 (7/2+) A 35S G 3594.4 11 35 2 E2 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.93 {I20} 35S cG $Compiler's note: ADO ratio overlaps stretched quadrupole or 35S 2cG stretched dipole 35S L 3815.0 7 (9/2-) 35S G 1824.4 6 48 2 M1 x 35S L 4023.1 6 (11/2-) 35S G 2032.4 4 70 16 E2 x 35S L 4822.5 7 (9/2+) 35S G 1007.2 11 4 2 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.87 {I15} 35S G 1228.3 6 11 2 M1 35S L 4899.6 8 (9/2+) 35S G 1305.3 4 5 3 M1 x 35S L 5009.8 6 (11/2-) 35S G 986.6 3 26 1 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.91 {I13} 35S cG M$the ADO ratio 35S 2cG is consistent with any multipolarity 35S L 5412.1 8 (9/2+) 35S G 1389.0 8 9 2 E1 35S L 5878.0 6 (11/2+) A 35S G 465.5 2 14 1 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.67 {I11} 35S G 868.2 4 20 2 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.54 {I21} 35S G 978.4 10 26 7 M1 x 35S G 1055.6 4 39 10 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.67 {I18} 35S G 1854.5 42 28 14 E1 35S G 2063.3 14 32 6 E1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.58 {I41} 35S cG M$the ADO ratio 35S 2cG is consistent with any multipolarity 35S G 2283.5 10 14 3 E2 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.83 {I17} 35S cG M$the ADO ratio 35S 2cG is consistent with any multipolarity 35S L 7179.7 7 (15/2+) A 35S G 1301.6 3 56 11 E2 35S cG $R{-ADO}=1.40 {I17} 35S L 8024.0 9 (17/2+) A 35S G 844.3 6 20 3 M1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.51 {I8} 35S L 8755.8 13 (17/2) 1 PS LT A 35S cL T$estimated by 2021Go09 from Doppler energy shifts 35S G 731.6 15 8 3 D 35S cG M$|DJ=1 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.43 {I9} 35S G 1576.3 14 14 3 D 35S cG M$from Weisskopf estimates (2021Go09) 35S cG M$|DJ=1 35S L 10048.5 11 (19/2) A 35S G 2868.7 8 26 2 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.98 {I13} 35S cG M$|DJ=2 assigned by 2021Go09 from ADO ratio, but the ratio overlaps 35S 2cG |DJ=1 also within the uncertainties 35S L 12469.2 16 (21/2) A 35S G 2420.6 11 21 6 35S cG $R{-ADO}=0.50 {I42} 35S cG M$|DJ=1 assigned by 2021Go09 from ADO ratio, but the ratio overlaps 35S 2cG |DJ=2 also within the uncertainties 35S 208PB(36S,XG):XUNDL-3 2022GR07 202209 35S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2022Gr07: 35S 2c Phys Rev C 106, 024314 (2022) 35S c Compiled by J. Chen (FRIB, MSU), September 3, 2022 35S c 2022Gr07: E=215 MeV (mid-target) {+36}S beam was produced from the 35S 2c Tandem-ALPI accelerator complex at the INFN Legnaro National 35S 3c Laboratory, Italy. Target was 99.7% enriched {+208}Pb with a thickness 35S 4c of 1 mg/cm{+2} on a 1 mg/cm{+2} Nb backing mounted onto the Cologne 35S 5c differential plunger. Fragments were detected and identified with the 35S 6c PRISMA magnetic spectrometer. |g rays were detected with the AGATA 35S 7c Demonstrator array consisting of five triple cluster modules of 35S 8c 36-folded segmented Ge crystals. Measured E|g, I|g, fragment-|g-coin, 35S 9c recoil distance. Deduced levels, lifetimes. Comparisons with 35S ac shell-model calculations. 35S cG E$As seen in FIG.2 of 2022Gr07; uncertainty not given by the authors 35S cL E,J$As given in 2022Gr07 35S cL T$From recoil-distance method with decay-curve analysis. 35S L 0.0 3/2+ 35S L 1572 1/2+ 2.29 PS 14 35S G 1572 35S L 1991 7/2- 35S G 1991 35S L 2717 7 5/2+ 35S G 2717 35S 34S(D,P),(D,PG):XUNDL-4 2024Ku24 202410 35S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2024Ku24 35S c Eur. Phys. J A 60, 176 (2024) 35S c Compiled by E.A. McCutchan (NNDC,BNL) October 15, 2024 35S c E=8 MeV/nucleon from Super-FN tandem Van de Graff accelerator 35S 2c at FSU. Measured Ep, Ip, E|g, I|g using the Super-Enge Split Pole 35S 3c Spectrograph (Se-SPS) for protons and a CeBr{-3} Array for gammas. 35S 4c Deduced energy levels, single-neutron spectroscopic overlaps; 35S 5c comparison to finite range DWBA PTOLEMY calculations. 35S CL S$LABEL=C{+2}S 35S cL E$Excitation energies without uncertainties are adopted from 35S 2cL the literature by 2024Ku24. 35S cL S$Uncertainties from fitting as well as sensitivity to 35S 2cL DWBA optical model parameters are included in reported uncertainties. 35S L 0 3/2+ 2 0.54 12 35S L 1571 1/2+ 0 0.14 7 35S cL S$from multi-dimensional fit to the data to account for L=1 transfer 35S 2cL to the 3.22 MeV state in {+33}S (2024Ku24) 35S G 1572 35S L 1991 7/2- 3 0.87 9 35S G 1991 35S L 2348 3/2- 1 0.22 7 35S L 2718 5/2+ 2 0.02 1 35S L 2939 3/2+ 2 0.01 1 35S cL S$based on measured yields from only 1 or 2 spectrometer settings. 35S L 3421 5/2+ 2 0.02 1 35S cL S$based on measured yields from only 1 or 2 spectrometer settings. 35S L 3802 3/2- 1 0.07 4 35S cL S$based on measured yields from only 1 or 2 spectrometer settings. 35S L 4189 1/2- 1 0.17 2 35S L 4477 3/2+ 2 0.07 2 35S cL E$assumed doublet 35S cL J,L,S$7/2-, 3, 0.05 {I2} for second component of doublet 35S L 4903 1/2- 1 0.78 8 35S L 4963 3/2- 1 0.32 3 35S L 5058 7/2- 3 0.08 1 35S L 5740 20 (5/2-) 3 0.03 1 35S L 5890 20 (3/2+) 2 0.11 2 35S L 6625 30 (2,3) 35S L 6915 30 (1,3) 35S L 7005 35 (2,3) 35S L 7150 35 (0,3) 35S L 7205 35 (1,2) 35S L 7495 40 (1,2) 35S L 7570 40 (2,3) 35S L 7640 40 (2,3) 35S 34S(D,PG):XUNDL-5 2024Co04 202506 35S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2024Co04: Nucl. Instrum. Methods 35S 2c Phys. Res. A 1058, 168827 (2024). 35S c Compiled by G. G~urdal, June 10, 2024 35S c {+35}S was populated by bombarding a {+34}S target with E{-d}=16 MeV 35S 2c at John D. Fox Superconducting Linear Accelerator Laboratory at 35S 3c Florida State University. Super-Enge Split-Pole Spectrography 35S 4c (Se-SPS) experimental setup consisted of light-ion focal plane 35S 5c detection system for particle identification and fast, low-background 35S 6c scintillators (four 2{+"}|*2{+"} and one 3{+"}|*4{+"} CeBr{-3}) for 35S 7c |g detection was used. For in-beam particle|g-coinc an external 35S 8c trigger was set requiring a coincidence between a focal-plane 35S 9c scintillator and the CeBr{-3} detectors within a |Dt=|+3|ms. T{-1/2} 35S ac was deduced by setting a direct excitation energy gate on the state 35S bc of interest and using fast-timing capabilities of Se-SPS. The side 35S cc feedings were excluded by selective excitation energy gates. 35S dc Measured: particle identification, particle energy, E{-|g}, 35S ec particle-|g coinc. Deduced: T{-1/2}. 35S cL E,J$From the Adopted Levels of {+35}S in ENSDF database. 35S cL T$From the relative timing between focal-plane scintillator and the 35S 2cL CeBr Array using convolution method. 35S cG E$From the particle-|g coin matrix gated on a specific excitation 35S 2cG energy. 35S L 0 3/2+ 35S L 1991 7/2- 1.2 NS 2 35S L 2348 3/2- 1.1 PS 1 35S cL T$from Fig. 14. The unit was typed as ns instead of ps in the Figure.