37S 2H(36S,P):XUNDL-1 2014BU01 201501 37S c Compiled (unevaluated) data set from 2014Bu01: 37S 2c Phys Rev Lett 112, 042502 (2014). 37S c Some data for {+37}S may have been taken by 2014Bu01 from 37S 2c their reference 16: Ph.D. thesis by G. Burgunder, 37S 3c University of Caen (2011) 37S c Compiled by C. Smith (ORNL/UTK) and C.D. Nesaraja (ORNL), 37S 2c January 20, 2014 37S c Edited by B. Singh (McMaster), Jan 21, 2015 37S c (d,p) transfer reaction in inverse kinematics used to investigate 37S 2c spin-orbit (SO) splittings in p{-3/2}-p{-1/2} and f{-7/2}-f{-5/2} 37S 3c orbitals in {+35}Si and {+37}S 37S c Beam: {+36}S beam with energy of 19 MeV/nucleon produced by 37S 2c fragmentation of {+36}S{+16+} beam in a 1075 |mm-thick Be target. 37S 3c The beam was separated, and selected using the LISE3 spectrometer 37S 4c at GANIL with intensity of 2 |*10{+5} {+36}S pps and purity of 95%. 37S c Target: 2.6 mg/cm{+2}{I1} Cd{-2} target 37S c Detectors: Two position-sensitive multiwire proportional chambers 37S 2c (FWHM= 1 mm) placed 0.92 m and 0.52 m upstream of target for nuclei 37S 3c detection. Ionization chamber placed 40cm downstream of target and 37S 4c 1.5cm-thick plastic scintillator located behind the IC for energy 37S 5c loss, tof measurements, and beam monitoring. Four modules of the 37S 6c MUST2 array placed 10 cm from the target covering polar angles ranging 37S 7c from 105|' to 150|' with respect to the beam direction for E(p) and 37S 8c |q(p) measurements and a 16 Si strip annular detector at a distance 37S 9c of 11.3 cm to cover polar angles from 156|' to 168|' to detect full 37S ac E(p). Four segmented Ge detectors from the EXOGAM array perpendicular 37S bc to the beam axis at a mean distance of 5 cm, and 9 cm downstream from 37S cc the target for |g-ray measurements with efficiency |e= 3.8 % {I2} at 37S dc 1 MeV 37S c Measured: E(p), ({+36}S)p-coin 37S c Theory: Determined spectroscopic factors using ADWA calculation with 37S 2c TWOFNR code and spin-orbit interaction using shell model calculation 37S cL S$Additional uncertainty of |?15% due to global potential in the ADWA 37S 2cL calculation is not included here 37S L 0 7/2- 0.69 14 37S cL $f{-7/2} orbital 37S L 645 3/2- 0.53 10 37S cL $p{-3/2} orbital 37S L 2638 1/2- 0.68 13 37S cL $p{-1/2} orbital 37S L 5.6E3 5/2- 0.36 37S cL $f{-5/2} orbital 37S cL E,J,S$from literature, three states centered around 5.6 MeV, all 37S 2cL of J|p=5/2- (see Adopted Levels of {+37}S in ENSDF database) 37S 208PB(36S,37SG):XUNDL-2 2016CH14 201604 37S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2016Ch14: 37S 2c Phys Rev 93, 044318 (2016) 37S c Compiled by B. Singh (McMaster), April 18, 2016 37S c Structure of {+37}S studied in a binary grazing reaction 37S c 2016Ch14: E({+36}S)=215 MeV. Measured yields of A=34-38 sulphur ions, 37S 2c Doppler-corrected |g spectra correlated with {+37}S ions, E|g, I|g, 37S 3c ({+37}S)|g-coin using magnetic spectrometer PRISMA for analyzing 37S 4c projectile-like fragments such as {+37}S in the present case, and CLARA 37S 5c array of 22 escape-suppressed Ge clover detectors for |g detection at 37S 6c the Tandem-ALPI accelerator complex of INFN-Legnaro. Insufficient 37S 7c statistics did not allow |g|g-coin analysis. Deduced levels, J|p, 37S 8c configurations. Comparison with shell-model calculations using the 37S 9c SDPF-U effective interaction. The |g decays from levels discussed 37S Ac in terms of particle-core coupling model and the shell model 37S cG E(N)$New |g ray reported by 2016Ch14 37S cL $Dominant configurations are from shell-model calculations (2016Ch14) 37S cL E$Deduced by compiler from E|g values 37S cL E(n)$New level proposed by 2016Ch14 37S cL E(I)$Intruder state (2016Ch14) 37S cL E(K)$Member of configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+1}(1d{-3/2}){+1}] multiplet 37S cL J$2016Ch14 take values from {+37}S Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database 37S 2cL (Jan 2012 update), unless otherwise stated 37S cL J(A)$Assignment proposed by 2016Ch14 37S PN 5 37S G 687 N 37S G 704 N 37S G 1185 N 37S cG $2016Ch14 mention that E|g matching is consistent with difference of 37S 2cG 3962 and 2776 levels, but J|p=(3/2-) for 3962 level and (11/2-) for 37S 3cG 2776 level is inconsistent with such a placement. However, compiler 37S 4cG notes that energy of the previously known level from (d,p) is 3967 keV, 37S 5cG not 3962, which gives a poor energy matching as well for the 1185 gamma 37S G 2589 N 37S L 0 7/2- 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+2}]; 70% amplitude 37S L 646 1 3/2- 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(2p{-3/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+2}]; 63% amplitude 37S G 646 1 100.0 8 37S L 1397 1 (3/2)+ I 37S G 751 1 5.4 3 37S L 1992 1 3/2- I 37S G 1346 1 1.9 2 37S G 1992 1 3.4 3 & 37S cG E$1992 |g ray is a possible unresolved doublet, with main placement 37S 2cG from the 2638 level 37S cG RI$compiler's note: from approximate branching ratios in {+37}S 37S 2cG Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset in the ENSDF database, intensity of 37S 3cG the 1992 transition from the 1992 level is expected to be only |?27% 37S 4cG of that of the 1346 transition i.e. |?0.5 relative intensity from 37S 5cG the 1992 level, and the remaining |?2.9 intensity from the 2638 level 37S L 2023 1 (7/2)- I 37S G 1377 1 0.8 2 37S G 2023 1 1.5 2 37S L 2515 1 (5/2)- K 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+1}(1d{-3/2}){+1}]; 70% amplitude 37S G 2515 1 4.0 4 N 37S L 2638 1 1/2- 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(2p{-1/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+2}]; 75% amplitude 37S G 1992 1 3.4 3 & 37S L 2776 2 (11/2-) A 37S F L FLAG=K 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+1}(1d{-3/2}){+1}]; 76% amplitude. 37S 3cL This strongly populated level in this work is also interpreted as 37S 4cL |n(1f{-7/2}){+1}~#(first 2+ in {+36}S) 37S G 2776 2 17.3 6 N 37S L 2978 2 (1/2,3/2) A 37S G 2332 2 2.1 3 N 37S L 3120 2 (9/2)+ I 37S G 3120 2 7.4 4 N 37S L 3262 2 3/2- K 37S cL $A previously proposed 1239 transition from 3262 level to 2023 level, 37S 2cL with an expected relative intensity of 1.6 was not seen by 2016Ch14 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+1}(1d{-3/2}){+1}]; 45% amplitude 37S G 2616 2 3.3 3 37S L 3341 2 (7/2,9/2) A 37S F L FLAG=nK 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(2s{-1/2}){+1}(1d{-3/2}){+1}] for J|p=9/2-; 37S 3cL 78% amplitude 37S G 3341 2 2.6 3 N 37S L 3442 2 (7/2)- 37S cL J$(7/2)- is given Fig. 5 of 2016Ch14, but (7/2,9/2) in authors' 37S 2cL Table II. In {+37}S Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database, J|p=(7/2)- 37S cL $Configuration=|n[(1d{-3/2}){+4}(1f{-7/2}){+1}]~# 37S 2cL |p[(1d{-5/2}){+6}(1d{-3/2}){+2}] for J|p=7/2-; 34% amplitude 37S G 3442 2 1.3 2 N 37S L 3605 3 (7/2,9/2) A 37S cL J$(1/2-,3/2+) was assigned based on L(d,p)=(1,2) in {+37}S Adopted 37S 2cL Levels in the ENSDF database. But in the present work 3605|g to 7/2- 37S 3cL g.s. is inconsistent with 1/2- or 3/2+. Either there is a disagreement 37S 4cL in J|p assignments or the level in (d,p) is different from the one 37S 5cL reported here, although the level energies are in excellent agreement 37S G 3605 3 2.3 3 N 37S L 4196 2 (13/2+) A ? 37S F L FLAG=n 37S cL $Potential yrast intruder 37S G 1420 1 7.5 3 N ? 37S 37P B- DECAY (2.31 S):XUNDL-3 2016WA25 201701 37S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset for 2016Wa25 37S c Phys Rev C 94, 044316 (2016) 37S c Compiled by E.A. McCutchan (NNDC,BNL), December 29, 2016 37S c {+37}P activity produced through fragmentation of {+40}Ar primary 37S 2c beam at 70 MeV/nucleon on a {+9}Be target at the Radioactive Ion Beam 37S 3c Line at the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou. Separation and 37S 4c purification by RIBLLI. A single sided Si detector was used for 37S 5c deposition of the secondary beam. Measured E|g, |b-|g coincidence, 37S 6c |g|g coincidence, |b|g(t) using a EJ212 plastic scintillator for |b 37S 7c particles, two fast timing LaBr{-3} detectors and two HPGe detectors. 37S 8c Deduced half-life of 3/2- state using the |b|g fast timing 37S 9c coincidence technique. Comparison of transition strength to two state 37S ac mixing calculations and systematics of N=21 isotones. 37S cL J$From the Adopted Levels of {+37}S in the ENSDF database (January 37S 2cL 2012 update) 37S cG E(A)$The 646|g was found in coincidence with the 1583|g, and not the 37S 2cG 751|g (2016Wa25) 37S cG $2016Wa25 state that all |g rays coincident with |b particles 37S 2cG reported in 1986Du07 were observed in the present experiment. 37P P 0 (1/2+) 2.31 S 13 7900 40 37P cP J,T$From the Adopted Levels of {+37}P in the ENSDF database (January 37P 2cP 2012 update) 37P cP QP$From 2012-AME (2012Wa38) 37S N 1.0 37S PN 5 37S G 751 37S X G FLAG=A 37S G 1583 37S X G FLAG=A 37S L 0 7/2- 5.05 M 2 37S cL T$from Adopted Levels of {+37}S in the ENSDF database (January 2012 37S 2cL update) 37S L 646.2 3 3/2- 133.8 PS 28 37S cL T$from |b|g fast timing coincidence using 646|g (2016Wa25) 37S G 646 [E2] 37S B G BE2W=5.13 12 37S 37P B- DECAY:XUNDL-4 2019AB06 202111 37S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2019Ab06: 37S c Phys. Rev. C 100, 014323 (2019) 37S c Compiled by E.A. McCutchan (NNDC,BNL) October 13, 2021 37S c {+37}Al ions were produced by fragmentation of a 140 37S 2c MeV/nucleon {+48}Ca beam from NSCL at Michigan State University on a 37S 3c 775 mg/cm{+2} Be target. Fragments were separated and identified 37S 4c using the A1900 spectrometer. The selected ions were implanted into 37S 5c a 16 x 16 segmented planar double-sided strip detector surrounded 37S 6c by 16 detectors of SeGA. The decay of {+37}P was studied as a 37S 7c daughter to the {+37}Al decay chain. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, 37S 8c |b|g using 16 detectors of the SeGA array. 37S c All data are from Figure 12 of 2019Ab06, except where noted. 37P P 0 1/2+ 2.31 S 13 7900 40 37P cP T$from the Adopted Levels of {+37}P in the ENSDF database 37S N 1.0 37S L 0 7/2- 37S L 646 1 3/2- 37S G 646 37S L 1397 1 (3/2+) 37S G 751 37S L 2229 1 1/2+ 37S cL $log {Ift} of 4.70 {I8} is given by 2019A06, for this level. 37S G 1583 37S L 2748 2 37S G 2102 37S L 2900 2 37S G 2254 37S L 3972 3 ? 37S G 3326 ? 37S 208PB(36S,XG):XUNDL-5 2022GR07 202209 37S c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2022Gr07: 37S 2c Phys Rev C 106, 024314 (2022) 37S c Compiled by J. Chen (FRIB, MSU), September 3, 2022 37S c 2022Gr07: E=215 MeV (mid-target) {+36}S beam was produced from the 37S 2c Tandem-ALPI accelerator complex at the INFN Legnaro National 37S 3c Laboratory, Italy. Target was 99.7% enriched {+208}Pb with a thickness 37S 4c of 1 mg/cm{+2} on a 1 mg/cm{+2} Nb backing mounted onto the Cologne 37S 5c differential plunger. Fragments were detected and identified with the 37S 6c PRISMA magnetic spectrometer. |g rays were detected with the AGATA 37S 7c Demonstrator array consisting of five triple cluster modules of 37S 8c 36-folded segmented Ge crystals. Measured E|g, I|g, fragment-|g-coin, 37S 9c recoil distance. Deduced levels, lifetimes. Comparisons with 37S ac shell-model calculations. 37S cG E$From 2022Gr07, uncertainty not given by the authors 37S cL E,J$As given in 2022Gr07 37S L 0.0 7/2- 37S L 646 3/2- 69 PS GT 37S cL T$from the observation of only the component corresponding to |g rays 37S 2cL after passage of the {+37}Si recoils through the setup for lifetime 37S 3cL range of 1 ps to 100 ps (2022Gr07) 37S G 646 37S L 1397 (3/2)+ 37S G 751 37S L 2776 (11/2-) 0.69 PS LT 37S cL T$from the observation of only the component corresponding to |g rays 37S 2cL before passage of the {+37}Si recoils through the setup for lifetime 37S 3cL range of 1 ps to 100 ps (2022Gr07) 37S G 2776 37S L 4196 (13/2+) ? 37S G 1420 ?