94ZR 94ZR(N,N'G):XUNDL-3 2007EL01 201311 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2007El01: 94ZR2c Phys Rev C 75, 011301(R) (2007); and Erratum published in 94ZR3c published in Phys. Rev. C 88, 029902(E) (2013). See also 2003Pe16: 94ZR4c Phys. Rev. C 88, 024317 (2013) 94ZR c Compiled by: B. Singh (McMaster) January 3, 2007 94ZR c Edited by B. Singh (McMaster), Nov 4, 2013 to include Erratum to 94ZR2c 2007El01 published in Phys. Rev. C 88, 029902(E) (2013) 94ZR c Measured E|g, I|g, |g(|q), lifetimes. Comparisons with predictions 94ZR2c from IBM-2 model. 94ZR cG MR$ From |g(|q) data (2007El01) 94ZR cL T$ From Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) (2007El01); 94ZR2cL as corrected in Erratum published in Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) 94ZR3cL (2013). Values given in 2007El01 were in error due to chemical 94ZR4cL composition of the sample. New measurements are reported in detail 94ZR5cL in 2013Pe16 for oxide (amorphous) and metallic samples. 94ZR6cL Values given here are the averages of half-lives obtained from the 94ZR7cL metal and oxide scattering samples (See 2013Pe16 for details). 94ZR8cL Original values in 2007El01 are given under comments for comparison 94ZR PN 6 94ZR L 0 0+ 94ZR L 918.8 2+ 94ZR G 918.8 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=4.9 {i3} from ENSDF for {+94}Zr. 94ZR L 1671.4 1 2+ 255 FS +19-16 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 121 fs {I14} (2007El01) 94ZR cL E$ mixed-symmetry state from strong M1 transition to first 2+ 94ZR G 752.5 1 76 4 M1(+E2) +0.02 2 94ZR cG $B(M1)=0.085 {i+6-7}, B(E2)(W.u.)=0.06 {i+13-6} 94ZR G 1671.4 1 100 4 E2 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 {i3} 94ZR L 2151.3 1 2+ 0.52 PS +19-11 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 0.22 fs {I+8-5} (2007El01) 94ZR G 479.9 2 5 2 M1+E2 +1.6 +7-6 94ZR cG $B(M1)=0.005 {i+4-5}, B(E2)(W.u.)=60 {i+24-30} 94ZR G 1232.4 1 100 2 M1+E2 -0.74 5 94ZR cG $B(M1)=0.014 {i+3-5}, B(E2)(W.u.)=5.0 {i+12-19} 94ZR G 2151.3 3 2 2 E2 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=0.019 {i+11-12} 94ZR COULOMB EXCITATION:MOM:XUNDL-42008WE07 200809 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2008We07: 94ZR2c Phys Rev C 78, 031301(R) (2008) 94ZR c Compiled by S. Geraedts and B. Singh (McMaster); Sep 17, 2008 94ZR c Beam={+94}Zr, target=carbon target layers with Gd backing 94ZR c E{+94}Zr)=275 MeV. Carbon target with Gd and Cu backings used for 94ZR2c Coulomb excitation at WNSL facility at Yale. Measured E|g, I|g, 94ZR3c (particle)|g coin using four HPGe Clover detectors. 94ZR4c Measured g factors by transient field technique 94ZR c Level scheme is from ENSDF database 94ZR L 0 0+ 94ZR L 918.8 2+ 94ZR2 L MOMM1=-0.64 4 (2008We07) 94ZR cL $g factor=-0.32 {I2} (2008We07, transient-field technique) 94ZR G 918.8 94ZR L 1671.4 2+ 94ZR2 L MOMM1=+1.8 5 (2008We07) 94ZR cL $g factor=+0.88 {I27} (2008We07, transient-field technique) 94ZR G 752.6 94ZR G 1671.4 94ZR 94ZR(N,N'G):XUNDL-5 2008EL09 201311 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2008El09: 94ZR2c Phys Rev C 78, 064303 (2008); erratum: Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) 94ZR3c (2013). See also 2003Pe16: Phys. Rev. C 88, 024317 (2013) 94ZR c Compiled by: C. Ouellet and B. Singh (McMaster) January 20, 2009 94ZR c Edited by B. Singh (McMaster) May 26, 2009 to include A{-2} and A{-4} 94ZR2c coefficients received as e-mail reply from Nico Orce on Jan 24, 2009 94ZR c Edited by B. Singh (McMaster), Nov 4, 2013 to include Erratum to 94ZR2c 2008El09 published in Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) (2013) 94ZR c Two experiments were done: 1. at Univ. of Kentucky; E(n)=2.3-3.5 MeV 94ZR2c nearly monoenergetic neutrons produced in {+3}H(p,n) reaction using a 94ZR3c 7 MV electrostatic accelerator and a tritium gas cell target. 2. 94ZR4c Fast neutrons (5 MeV) produced in {+2}H(d,n){+3}He reaction using 94ZR5c TUNL FN Tandem Van de Graff accelerator. 94ZR6c Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |g(|q), lifetimes by DSAM. Comparison with 94ZR7c IBM-2 model and Shell model calculations. 94ZR c All lifetimes are revised in the Erratum to 2008El09 published in 94ZR2c Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) (2013) 94ZR cG $ A{-2}2 and A{-4}4 coefficients are from an e-mail reply from 94ZR2cG Nico Orce on Jan 24, 2009 94ZR cG E(X)$ The |g-ray energy not included in the fitting procedure 94ZR cL E$ From least-squares fit to E|g's. Normalized |h{+2}=3.7. 94ZR2cL Three weak |g rays were left out of the fitting procedure. Their 94ZR3cL inclusion gives normalized |h{+2}=24 94ZR cL T$ From Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) (2008El09), unless 94ZR2cL otherwise stated. Values are taken from Erratum to 2008El09 94ZR3cL published in Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) (2013). Values given in 94ZR4cL 2008El09 were in error due to chemical composition of the sample. 94ZR5cL New measurements are reported in detail in 2013Pe16 for oxide 94ZR6cL (amorphous) and metallic samples, or deduced from correlations 94ZR7cL established between metallic and oxide samples. See 2013Pe16 94ZR7cL for full details. Values in 2008El09 are given under comments 94ZR8cL for comparison 94ZR cL T(A)$From the average of half-lives obtained from the metal and oxide 94ZR2cL scattering samples (See also 2013Pe16) 94ZR cL T(D)$Original value in 2008El09 from DSAM method for a powder sample 94ZR2cL of {+94}Zr adjusted by empirical correlations between powder and metal 94ZR3cL samples deduced in 2013Pe16. The given value is termed as metal 94ZR4cL equivalent 94ZR cL T(X)$ From Adopted dataset for {+94}Zr in ENSDF database 94ZR cL J$ From literature for low-lying levels, from |g(|q) and excitation 94ZR2cL functions for higher levels. All assignments are as given by 2008El09 94ZR PN 7 94ZR G 1398.1 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=2.8 MeV 94ZR G 1484.3 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.5 MeV 94ZR G 1855.6 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.4 MeV 94ZR G 1981.4 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=2.9 MeV 94ZR G 2252.8 2 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.6 MeV 94ZR G 2398.5 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.5 MeV 94ZR G 2561.9 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.7 MeV 94ZR G 2671.3 2 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.7 MeV 94ZR G 3156.3 1 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.5 MeV 94ZR G 3547.6 2 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.7 MeV 94ZR G 3660.8 2 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.9 MeV 94ZR G 3681.3 2 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.9 MeV 94ZR G 3871.6 2 94ZR cG E$ seen at lowest E(n)=3.9 MeV 94ZR L 0.0 0+ 94ZR L 918.826 19 2+ 6.9 PS 15 X 94ZR G 918.82 2 100 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.23 1 $ A4=-0.006 20 94ZRB G BE2W=4.9 3 94ZR L 1300.39 7 0+ 0.291 NS 11 X 94ZR G 381.58 10 100 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=9.4 4 94ZR L 1469.79 5 4+ 0.500 NS 13 X 94ZR G 550.78 10 100 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.37 15 $ A4=-0.11 3 94ZRB G BE2W=0.878 23 94ZR L 1671.47 3 2+ 255 FS +19-16 A 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 127 fs {I+9-8} (2008El09) 94ZR cL E$one phonon mixed-symmetry (ms) state with anomalous decay behavior 94ZR G 752.50 10 42 1 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.23 1 $ A4=-0.09 2 94ZR cG MR$+0.02 {I2} or +2.2 {I5} 94ZR cG $B(M1)=0.15 {I1}; B(E2)(W.u.)=0.06 {I+12-6} or 125 {I25} 94ZR G 1671.40 10 58 1 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.29 2 $ A4=-0.04 3 94ZRB G BE2W=3.9 3 94ZR L 2057.97 4 3- 88 FS +7-6 A 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 51 fs {I4} (2008El09) 94ZR G 588.05 10 2.5 5 E1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.1 1 $ A4=+0.2 2 94ZRB G BE1W=0.8E-3 2 94ZR G 1138.96 5 97.5 5 E1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.27 2 $ A4=-0.02 2 94ZRB G BE1W=4.3E-3 +4-3 94ZR cG E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1139.14 94ZR L 2151.29 4 2+ 0.52 PS +19-11 A 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 0.23 ps {I+7-5} (2008El09) 94ZR cL E$two phonon symmetric excitation 94ZR G 479.90 20 5 1 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.36 14 $ A4=+0.02 20 94ZR cG MR$+0.19 {I+25-15} or +1.6 {I+7-6} 94ZR cG $B(M1)=0.07 {I+4-3} or +0.012 {I+9-7}; B(E2)(W.u.)=7 {I+4-3} or 135 94ZRxcG {I+115-75} 94ZR G 1232.40 10 93 1 E2+M1 -0.75 +4-5 94ZR2 G A2=-0.26 1 $ A4=-0.02 2 94ZRB G BE2W=11 3 94ZRB G BM1=0.05 +2-1 94ZR G 2151.30 30 2 1 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.23 16 $ A4=+0.01 23 94ZRB G BE2W=0.04 +4-2 94ZR L 2329.93 4 4+ 0.29 PS +14-8 94ZR cL T$ from table I in 2003Pe16. Listed as 0.30 ps {+35-12} in 94ZR2cL table I of erratum. Previous value was 194 fs {I+28-23} (2008El09) 94ZR G 658.45 5 5.5 3 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.36 14 $ A4=+0.02 20 94ZRB G BE2W=52 +10-8 94ZR G 1411.11 5 94.5 3 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.40 3 $ A4=-0.13 5 94ZRB G BE2W=19 +3-2 94ZR L 2366.28 6 2+ 0.69 PS +56-22 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 268 fs {I+42-21} (2008El09) 94ZR G 308.50 5 8 1 E1 X 94ZR2 G A2=-0.03 3 $ A4=+0.04 5 94ZRB G BE1W=3.3E-3 5 94ZR G 694.80 5 40 1 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.19 2 $ A4=+0.02 3 94ZR cG MR$+2.90 {I+35-25} or -0.07 {I+3-4} 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=1.02 {I15} or 187 {I+55-40}; B(M1)=0.18 {I+3-2} or 0.018 94ZRxcG {I5} 94ZR G 1065.89 5 10.5 5 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.39 7 $ A4=-0.01 8 94ZRB G BE2W=6 1 94ZR G 1447.55 20 41.5 5 M1+E2 +0.65 +25-20 94ZR2 G A2=+0.46 2 $ A4=-0.002 31 94ZRB G BE2W=1.6 +5-4 94ZRB G BM1=0.014 3 94ZR L 2507.89 10 3+ 1.04 PS +97-35 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 0.36 ps {I+9-6} (2008El09) 94ZR G 356.6 5 3 2 94ZR G 836.39 10 14 2 M1+E2 -0.9 +4-5 94ZR2 G A2=-0.85 13 $ A4=+0.15 14 94ZRB G BE2W=10 5 94ZRB G BM1=0.014 +8-6 94ZR G 1589.15 20 83 2 E2+M1 +1.5 +3-8 94ZR2 G A2=+0.67 2 $ A4=+0.12 3 94ZRB G BE2W=4 +1-2 94ZRB G BM1=0.006 +5-2 94ZR L 2605.5 3 5- 180 FS +76-49 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 111 fs {I+35-23} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1135.7 3 100 E1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.38 7 $ A4=-0.11 9 94ZRB G BE1W=2.0E-3 +6-5 94ZR L 2698.46 6 (1) 94ZR G 547.30 7 94ZR2 G A2=+0.5 3 $ A4=+0.3 4 94ZR G 1026.91 20 94ZR2 G A2=+0.39 16 $ A4=+0.62 20 94ZR G 1779.32 10 94ZR G 2698.9 4 94ZR L 2826.75 3 3+ 185 FS +33-26 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 115 fs {I+19-15} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1155.27 2 88.5 5 M1+E2 +0.40 3 94ZR2 G A2=+0.28 3 $ A4=+0.06 5 94ZRB G BE2W=11.5 20 94ZRB G BM1=0.17 3 94ZR G 1907.91 4 11.5 5 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.39 14 $ A4=+0.07 20 94ZR cG MR$+0.52 {I+16-12} or +0.3 {I+17-2} 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=0.18 {I+5-4} or 0.8 {I+8-4}; B(M1)=0.004 {I1} or 0.0005 94ZRxcG {I+3-4} 94ZR L 2846.35 5 1- 5.0 FS +19-17 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 1.5 fs {I6} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1927.30 10 E1 94ZR G 2846.36 5 100 10 E1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.16 6 $ A4=-0.08 8 94ZRB G BE1W=10E-3 +7-3 94ZR L 2860.79 6 (5+) 0.46 PS +42-16 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 187 fs {I+44-31} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1390.99 2 100 M1+E2 +0.35 +5-4 94ZR2 G A2=+0.34 5 $ A4=+0.10 7 94ZRB G BE2W=2.5 +6-5 94ZRB G BM1=0.07 2 94ZR L 2873.73 5 (4+) 243 FS +83-55 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 130 fs {I+26-19} (2008El09) 94ZR G 543.74 20 27 1 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=+0.19 13 $ A4=-0.1 2 94ZR G 1403.93 2 60 1 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=+0.06 6 $ A4=+0.09 9 94ZR G 1954.91 7 13 1 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.24 10 $ A4=-0.31 10 94ZRB G BE2W=0.8 2 94ZR L 2888.27 6 4+ 176 FS +30-23 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 101 fs {I+10-8} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1969.42 5 100 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.14 5 94ZRB G BE2W=7.5 7 94ZR L 2908.04 3 2+ 0.17 PS +10-6 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 113 fs {I+12-10} (2008El09) 94ZR cL E,J$candidate two phonon mixed-symmetry (ms) state 94ZR G 756.71 3 22.5 6 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.15 7 $ A4=-0.08 10 94ZR cG MR$-0.04 {I+9-8} or +2.7 {I+10-6} 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=0.3 {I+10-3} or 130 {I+74-48}; B(M1)=0.18 {I2} or 0.017 94ZRxcG {I+7-8} 94ZR G 1236.57 2 45 1 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.07 6 $ A4=-0.12 8 94ZR G 1989.21 3 17.5 7 M1+E2 +0.7 +6-5 94ZR2 G A2=+0.35 12 $ A4=-0.25 18 94ZRB G BE2W=0.4 +2-1 94ZRB G BM1=0.005 2 94ZR G 2908.05 10 15 1 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.26 13 $ A4=+0.08 17 94ZRB G BE2W=0.14 3 94ZR L 2927.59 7 3- 0.37 PS +65-16 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 0.18 ps {I+14-6} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1457.79 4 100 E1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.11 17 $ A4=+0.11 22 94ZRB G BE1W=0.6E-3 3 94ZR L 2945.44 5 5- 94ZR cL T$>0.26 ps (2008El09); no value given in erratum 94ZR G 887.46 3 100 E2 94ZR2 G A2=-0.21 9 $ A4=+0.08 11 94ZR L 3000.12 4 263 FS +97-62 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 140 fs {I+28-21} (2008El09) 94ZR G 2081.27 3 100 94ZR L 3029.81 12 (5+) 94ZR cL T$>0.87 ps (2008El09); no value given in erratum 94ZR G 1560.01 10 100 M1+E2 -0.28 +8-9 94ZR2 G A2=-0.76 15 $ A4=-0.03 20 94ZRB G BE2W<0.2 94ZRB G BM1<0.01 94ZR L 3056.4 10 (2+) 115 FS +55-32 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 69 fs {I+28-17} (2008El09) 94ZR G 2137.5 10 100 E2+M1 94ZR cG MR$+1.6 {I+5-4} or +0.15 {I+15-8} 94ZR2 G A2=+0.30 9 $ A4=-0.01 13 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=5 {I2} or 0.16 {I+6-5}; B(M1)=0.02 {I1} or 0.06 {I2} 94ZR L 3058.3 4 2(-) 55 FS +8-7 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 29.8 fs {I28} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1385.1 5 45 1 E1(+M2) -0.06 6 94ZR2 G A2=+0.16 6 $ A4=-0.06 8 94ZR cG E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=1386.8 94ZRB G BE1W=1.89E-3 +19-16 94ZR G 2141.1 5 55 1 E1+M2 -0.13 8 94ZR2 G A2=+0.06 11$ A4=-0.06 12 94ZR cG E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=2139.4 94ZRB G BE1W=0.62E-3 +6-5 94ZR L 3089.46 7 (4-) 0.31 PS +24-10 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 0.16 ps {I+7-4} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1031.48 5 55 1 M1+E2 -0.32 8 94ZR2 G A2=-0.72 12$ A4=+0.09 16 94ZRB G BE2W=5 2 94ZRB G BM1=0.11 4 94ZR G 1619.7 5 45 1 E1(+M2) -0.14 12 94ZR2 G A2=+0.46 9 $ A4=+0.29 12 94ZRB G BE1W=0.22E-3 8 94ZR L 3141.62 5 (4+) 114 FS +60-33 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 83 fs {I+21-17} (2008El09) 94ZR G 811.68 2 100 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.36 8 $ A4=-0.07 11 94ZR cG MR$-0.01 {I+9-8} or +1.24 {I+28-24} 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=0.1 {I+12-1} or 38E1 +16-12; B(M1)=0.89 {I+22-20} or 0.28 94ZRxcG {I+11-9} 94ZR L 3155.96 3 (4+) 64 FS +10-8 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 35.3 fs {I21} (2008El09) 94ZR G 2237.11 2 100 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.19 6 $ A4=+0.01 9 94ZRB G BE2W=11 1 94ZR L 3200.35 3 1(+) 14.6 FS +35-28 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 6.5 fs {I+23-21} (2008El09) 94ZR cL E,J$candidate two phonon mixed-symmetry (ms) state 94ZR G 2281.73 11 11.5 2 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.4 4 $ A4=-0.4 6 94ZR G 3200.27 3 88.5 2 M1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.07 8 $ A4=+0.10 11 94ZRB G BM1=0.16 +8-4 94ZR L 3219.85 5 (3+) 105 FS +19-15 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 65 fs {I+9-8} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1069.6 5 22.5 8 E2+M1 94ZR cG MR$+2.1 {I+8-7} or +0.9 {I+24-2} 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=46 {I+28-22} or 18 {I+36-5}; B(M1)=0.02 {I1} or 0.05 94ZRxcG {I+2-5} 94ZR G 1161.82 3 52 1 E1 94ZR2 G A2=+0.29 6 $ A4=-0.03 8 94ZRB G BE1W=1.7E-3 2 94ZR G 1751.04 11 E2+M1 X 94ZR2 G A2=-0.2 3 $ A4=-0.4 4 94ZRF G FL=1469.79 94ZR G 2301.44 10 25.5 8 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=+0.03 14$ A4=-0.24 18 94ZR cG E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=2300.99 94ZR L 3224.93 8 (4+) 94 FS +15-12 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 57 fs {I+7-6} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1755.22 10 75 1 M1+E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.45 12$ A4=-0.04 17 94ZR cG MR$+0.09 {I+25-14} or +1.0 {I+4-10} 94ZR cG $B(E2)(W.u.)=0.14 {I+72-14} or 9 {I+3-9}; B(M1)=0.095 {I+15-14} or 94ZRxcG 0.05 {I+5-2} 94ZR G 2305.98 10 25 1 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=1.5 2 94ZR L 3284.41 5 (2+) 54 FS +8-7 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 34 fs {I+5-4} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1226.34 5 34 1 E1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.01 12$ A4=+0.06 16 94ZRB G BE1W=1.8E-3 3 94ZR G 2365.65 5 58 2 M1+E2 +2.0 +7-5 94ZR2 G A2=+0.25 12$ A4=-0.19 17 94ZRB G BE2W=4 +2-1 94ZRB G BM1=0.014 6 94ZR G 3284.29 16 8 2 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.4 4 $ A4=+0.3 4 94ZRB G BE2W=0.14 +5-4 94ZR L 3318.69 5 2+ 45 FS +8-7 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 28 fs {I+5-4} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1647.0 5 51 5 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=+0.09 13$ A4=+0.15 17 94ZR G 3318.63 5 49 5 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.40 14$ A4=-0.02 20 94ZRB G BE2W=0.98 +29-23 94ZR L 3331.4 5 (1+) 94ZR cL T$0.20 fs {I+39-8} in 2008El09; no value given in erratum 94ZR G 2412.5 5 100 E2+M1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.12 22$ A4=-0.05 31 94ZR L 3336.3 5 (5+) 60 FS +24-16 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 37 fs {I+14-10} (2008El09) 94ZR G 1866.5 5 100 M1+E2 +0.5 1 94ZR2 G A2=-0.20 23$ A4=+0.4 3 94ZRB G BE2W=5 2 94ZRB G BM1=0.13 +6-4 94ZR L 3361.51 6 (3) 88 FS +21-15 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 54 fs {I+11-8} (2008El09) 94ZR G 996.77 3 X 94ZR2 G A2=+0.28 17$ A4=+0.11 22 94ZRF G FL=2366.28 94ZR G 1891.68 4 74 2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.02 12$ A4=+0.29 18 94ZR G 2442.86 14 26 2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.1 5 $ A4=+0.2 6 94ZR L 3411.24 11 (4+) 17 FS +7-6 D 94ZR cL T$ previous value was 9.7 fs {I+42-35} (2008El09) 94ZR G 2492.38 10 100 E2 94ZR2 G A2=+0.15 27$ A4=+0.3 3 94ZRB G BE2W=24 +14-7 94ZR L 3482.41 12 (4+) 94ZR G 2012.6 1 94ZR L 3551.97 20 94ZR G 2633.1 2 94ZR L 3553.21 12 (5+) 94ZR G 2083.4 1 94ZR L 3562.01 21 (5+) 94ZR G 2092.2 2 94ZR L 3579.57 11 (4+) 94ZR G 2660.7 1 94ZR L 3597.37 11 (5-) 94ZR G 2678.5 1 94ZR L 3699.32 12 (4+) 94ZR G 2229.5 1 94ZR 94ZR(N,N'G):XUNDL-6 2013CH01 201301 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2013Ch01: 94ZR2c Phys Rev Lett 110, 022504 (2013) 94ZR c Compiled by B. Singh (McMaster), Jan 9, 2013 94ZR c Includes {+94}Y to {+94}Zr decay study 94ZR c In (n,n'|g), measured lifetimes by DSAM at E(n)=2.0-2.5 MeV 94ZR2c and E(n)=2.3-2.8 MeV. Gamma-ray angular distributions were 94ZR3c measured using HPGe detector. 94ZR c In {+94}Y decay experiment, radioactive ions of {+94}Y were 94ZR2c produced by the fission of {+238}UC{-x} with 500-MeV protons 94ZR3c from at TRIUMF-ISAC facility. Gamma-ray spectra in coincidence 94ZR4c mode were collected using 8|p array of 20 Compton-suppressed 94ZR5c HPGe detectors and a plastic scintillator for beta particles. 94ZR2c measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin. Deduced collective structure 94ZR3c in {+94}Zr 94ZR c Further results from the two experiments are to appear in future 94ZR2c publications (references 8 and 9 in 2013Ch01) 94ZR cG E$ Rounded values from 2008El09: Phys. Rev. C 78, 064303 (2008), 94ZR2cG unless otherwise stated 94ZR CL BAND(A)$ Collective structure based on excited 0+ 94ZR PN 7 94ZR L 0.0 0+ 94ZR L 918.8 2+ 6.9 PS 15 94ZR cL T$ from 2001Ra27 evaluation 94ZR G 918.8 100 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=4.9 11 94ZR L 1300.39 0+ 291 PS 11 A 94ZR cL T$ from 1990Ma40: Phys. Rev. C42, 568 94ZR G 381.6 100 E2 0.00973 94ZRB G BE2W=9.3 4 94ZR L 1469.70 4+ 500 PS 13 94ZR cL T$ from 1990Ma40: Phys. Rev. C42, 568 94ZR G 550.8 100 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=0.880 23 94ZR L 1671.45 2+ 0.255 PS +19-16 A 94ZR cL T$ from current work, also to be published (reference 9 in 2013Ch01) 94ZR G 371.1 2 0.150 6 E2 0.0106 94ZR cG E,RI$ from 2013Ch01, deduced from {+94}Y decay 94ZRB G BE2W=19 2 94ZR G 752.5 41.9 10 M1+E2 +0.02 2 94ZR cG MR$ from 2008El09 94ZRB G BE2W=0.06 +13-6 94ZR G 1671.4 57.9 10 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=3.9 3 94ZR L 2329.97 4+ 0.29 PS +14-8 A 94ZR cL T$ from current work, also to be published (reference 9 in 2013Ch01) 94ZR G 658.5 5.5 3 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=34 +10-17 94ZR G 1411.1 94.5 3 E2 94ZRB G BE2W=13 +4-7 94ZR 93ZR(N,G):RES:XUNDL-7 2013TA04 201305 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2013Ta04: 94ZR2c Phys Rev C 87, 014622 (2013) 94ZR c Compiled by E. Thiagalingam and B. Singh (McMaster); May. 24, 2013 94ZR c E(n)<8 keV from Pb(p,X),E=20 GeV/c. Target={+93}Zr 94ZR2c (19.98%). Measured prompt |g-ray cascades, and yields using two |g-ray 94ZR3c detectors consisting of C{-6}D{-6} liquid scintillator cells at the 94ZR4c n_TOF facility in CERN. 94ZR5c Deduced neutron resonances, capture kernel, resonance 94ZR6c parameters by R-matrix analysis. Maxwellian-averaged capture cross 94ZR7c sections. Comparison with previous experimental studies. 94ZR c J|p({+93}Zr g.s.)=5/2+ 94ZR cL E$ S(n)({+94}Zr)+E{-R}, where S(n)=8219.5 keV {I19} (2012Wa38) 94ZR CL S$LABEL=g|G{-n}|G{-|g}/(|G{-n}+|G{-|g}) meV 94ZR cL S$ Statistical factor g=(2J+1)/12, J=spin of the resonance 94ZR cL S(A)$ Parameter for poorly resolved resonance 94ZR L SN+.110383 2 37.16 8 94ZR L SN+.225035 4 6.64 5 94ZR L SN+.669096 9 25.2 3 94ZR L SN+0.69327 1 50.0 4 94ZR L SN+0.88211 3 3.9 1 94ZR L SN+0.93434 1 43.7 5 94ZR L SN+1.01072 1 30.5 4 94ZR L SN+1.23789 4 7.5 2 94ZR L SN+1.4979 1 3.2 6 94ZR L SN+1.57472 4 28.9 7 94ZR L SN+1.64221 4 24. 1 94ZR L SN+1.7085 1 6.4 7 94ZR L SN+1.74316 3 40 1 94ZR L SN+1.80242 3 41.4 8 94ZR L SN+2.05329 5 42 1 94ZR L SN+2.11632 8 10.9 5 94ZR L SN+2.2093 1 7.1 5 94ZR L SN+2.32018 6 44 2 94ZR L SN+2.3588 1 19 1 94ZR L SN+2.4040 1 7.0 5 94ZR L SN+2.61075 6 35 2 94ZR L SN+2.7674 4 94 8 94ZR L SN+2.89852 6 54 3 94ZR L SN+3.0087 1 69 2 94ZR L SN+3.1620 5 79 9 94ZR L SN+3.25143 7 90 2 94ZR L SN+3.5114 2 48 2 94ZR L SN+3.6900 1 43 2 94ZR L SN+3.6985 2 46 2 94ZR L SN+3.8723 2 61 5 94ZR L SN+3.9961 2 55 3 94ZR L SN+4.0935 5 11 2 94ZR L SN+4.130 1 59 9 94ZR L SN+4.1560 2 44 4 94ZR L SN+4.1805 2 85 4 94ZR L SN+4.2882 4 15 3 94ZR L SN+4.4323 2 30 2 94ZR L SN+4.4838 2 64 4 94ZR L SN+4.5773 2 54 3 94ZR L SN+4.7797 2 26 2 94ZR L SN+5.01070 2 106 4 94ZR L SN+5.0277 3 48 3 94ZR L SN+5.1336 3 51 3 94ZR L SN+5.5392 3 41 12 94ZR L SN+5.6747 6 31 3 94ZR L SN+5.7381 4 37 13 94ZR L SN+5.9001 6 26 10 94ZR L SN+5.923 1 25 8 94ZR L SN+6.1093 5 24 8 94ZR L SN+6.1480 4 58 4 94ZR L SN+6.2074 5 36 3 94ZR L SN+6.3390 3 75 4 94ZR L SN+6.3764 4 39 3 94ZR L SN+6.620 1 (14) 3 A 94ZR L SN+6.7665 5 79 7 94ZR L SN+6.822 2 (15) 12A 94ZR L SN+6.9771 2 (31) 23A 94ZR L SN+7.0733 3 (23) 18A 94ZR L SN+7.1688 5 102 6 94ZR L SN+7.4071 6 45 4 94ZR L SN+7.5870 5 53 17 94ZR L SN+7.772 2 41 14 94ZR L SN+7.8931 6 50 5 94ZR L SN+7.945 1 141 9 94ZR 94ZR(N,N'G):DSAM:XUNDL-8 2013PE16 201311 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2013Pe16: 94ZR2c Phys Rev C 88, 024317 (2013). Includes Erratum to 2008El09 94ZR3c (Phys. Rev. C 78, 064303) published in 94ZR4c Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) (2013) 94ZR c Compiled by A. Chakraborty (Krishnath College, India), and B. Singh 94ZR2c (McMaster), Nov 4, 2013 94ZR c Level lifetimes of low-lying levels in {+94}Zr were measured with 94ZR2c the Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) following the (n,n'|g) 94ZR3c reaction on scattering samples of Zr metal and ZrO{-2} of natural 94ZR4c isotopic abundance at E(n)=2.0-3.5 MeV. A single HPGe detector 94ZR5c was used. Empirical relation established between half-lives obtained 94ZR6c from metallic and amorphous oxide samples of {+94}Zr 94ZR cG E$ From 2008El09 (Phys. Rev. C 78, 064303) 94ZR cL E,J$From 2008El09 (Phys. Rev. C 78, 064303) 94ZR cL T$From DSA measurement with metallic sample, unless otherwise stated 94ZR2cL (2013Pe16). The quoted uncertainties in half-lives are statistical 94ZR3cL only. Values for oxide sample are given in 2008El09 which are about 94ZR4cL a factor of 2 lower than those with metallic sample or deduced for 94ZR5cL metallic equivalent by an empirical formula relating lifetimes for 94ZR6cL metallic and oxide samples. 94ZR cL T(A)$From the average of half-lives obtained from the metal and oxide 94ZR2cL scattering samples (2013Pe16) 94ZR cL T(D)$Original value in 2008El09 from DSAM method for a powder sample 94ZR2cL of {+94}Zr adjusted by empirical correlations between powder and metal 94ZR3cL samples deduced in 2013Pe16. The given value is termed as metal 94ZR4cL equivalent 94ZR cL T(X)$ From Adopted Levels of {+94}Zr in ENSDF database 94ZR L 0.0 0+ 94ZR L 918.82 2 2+ 6.9 PS 15 X 94ZR G 918.82 2 94ZR L 1469.70 2 4+ 0.500 NS 13 X 94ZR G 550.78 10 94ZR L 1671.45 2 2+ 255 FS +19-16 A 94ZR G 752.50 10 94ZR G 1671.40 10 94ZR L 2057.87 2 3- 88 FS +7-6 A 94ZR G 1138.96 5 94ZR L 2151.34 2 2+ 0.52 PS +19-11 A 94ZR G 1232.40 10 94ZR L 2329.97 2 4+ 0.29 PS +14-8 94ZR cL T$from table I in 2013Pe16. Other: 0.30 ps {I+35-12} in table I of 94ZR2cL erratum: Phys. Rev. C 88, 029903(E) (2013) 94ZR G 1411.11 5 94ZR L 2366.34 2 2+ 0.69 PS +56-22 94ZR G 694.80 5 94ZR G 1447.55 20 94ZR L 2507.92 2 3+ 1.04 PS +97-35 D 94ZR G 1589.15 20 94ZR L 2605.39 3 5- 180 FS +76-49 D 94ZR G 1135.67 30 94ZR L 2826.75 3 3+ 185 FS +33-26 94ZR G 1155.27 2 94ZR L 2846.36 5 1- 5.0 FS +19-17 94ZR G 2846.36 5 94ZR L 2860.70 3 (5+) 0.46 PS +42-16 94ZR G 1390.99 2 94ZR L 2873.65 3 (4+) 243 FS +83-55 D 94ZR G 543.74 20 94ZR G 1403.93 2 94ZR G 1954.91 7 94ZR L 2888.25 7 4+ 176 FS +30-23 D 94ZR G 1969.42 5 94ZR L 2908.04 3 2+ 0.17 PS +10-6 94ZR G 756.71 3 94ZR G 1236.57 2 94ZR G 1989.21 3 94ZR G 2908.05 10 94ZR L 2927.50 5 3- 0.37 PS +65-16 D 94ZR G 1457.79 4 94ZR L 3000.01 4 263 FS +97-62 D 94ZR G 2081.27 3 94ZR L 3056.35 13 (2+) 115 FS +55-32 D 94ZR G 2137.5 10 94ZR L 3058.50 50 2(-) 55 FS +8-7 94ZR G 1385.08 50 94ZR G 2141.06 50 94ZR L 3089.39 46 (4-) 0.31 PS +24-10 D 94ZR G 1031.48 5 94ZR G 1619.7 5 94ZR L 3141.66 4 (4+) 114 FS +60-33 94ZR G 811.68 2 94ZR L 3155.93 3 (4+) 64 FS +10-8 94ZR G 2237.11 2 94ZR L 3200.28 4 1(+) 14.6 FS +35-28 94ZR G 2281.73 11 94ZR G 3200.27 3 94ZR L 3219.72 4 (3+) 105 FS +19-15 D 94ZR G 1069.58 50 94ZR G 1161.82 3 94ZR G 2301.44 10 94ZRF G FL=918.82 94ZR L 3224.84 4 (4+) 94 FS +15-12 D 94ZR G 1755.22 10 94ZR G 2305.98 10 94ZR L 3284.46 6 (2+) 54 FS +8-7 D 94ZR G 1226.34 5 94ZRF G FL=2057.87 94ZR G 2365.65 5 94ZR G 3284.29 16 94ZR L 3318.63 7 2+ 45 FS +8-7 D 94ZR G 1647.00 50 94ZR G 3318.63 5 94ZR L 3336.22 65 (5+) 60 FS +24-16 D 94ZR G 1866.52 50 94ZR L 3361.41 6 (3) 88 FS +21-15 D 94ZR G 1891.68 4 94ZR G 2442.86 14 94ZR L 3411.21 12 (4+) 17 FS +7-6 D 94ZR G 2492.38 10 94ZR 94ZR(E,E'):BE2:XUNDL-9 2014SC04 201403 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2014Sc04: 94ZR2c Phys Rev C 89, 037301 (2014) 94ZR c Compiled by B. Singh (McMaster); March 17, 2014 94ZR c Beam=71 MeV electron beam from S-DALINAC linear accelerator in 94ZR2c Darmstadt. Target=10 mg/cm{+2} 96.07% enriched {+94}Zr. 94ZR3c Measured electron scattering spectra and angular distributions. 94ZR4c Deduced B(E2) ratios for first 2+ and second 2+ states using direct 94ZR5c relationship between form factors and transition strengths. Plane-wave 94ZR6c Born approximation analysis for the scattering process 94ZR cL E,J$From Adopted Levels for {+94}Zr in ENSDF database 94ZR L 0 0+ 94ZR L 918.8 2+ 94ZR L 1671.4 2+ 94ZR cL $ B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 {I9} (2014Sc04) 94ZR cL $B(E2)(second 2+)/B(E2)(first 2+)=0.789 {I43} (2014Sc04). 94ZR2cL Using B(E2)(W.u.)=4.9 {I11} for first 2+ from 2001Ra27 evaluation, 94ZR3cL 2014Sc04 obtain B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 {I9} for second 2+ state. 94ZR4cL This value is in agreement with DSAM result from 2013Pe16, but 94ZR5cL with earlier DSAM value from the same group reported in 2008El09 94ZR L 2057.6 3- 94ZR 94ZR 2B-:T1/2:XUNDL-12 2017DO04 201707 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2017Do04: 94ZR2c Eur Phys J A 53, 74 (2017) 94ZR c Compiled by: Jun Chen (NSCL/MSU), June 1, 2017 94ZR c 2017Do04: The measurement was performed at TIFR, Mumbai using a 94ZR2c 232 g~*y exposure of natural zirconium with the TiLES (TIFR Low 94ZR3c background Experimental Setup) consisting of a high-efficiency 94ZR4c (70%) HPGe detector surrounded by a Radon exclusion box and a 94ZR5c muon-veto system of three plastic scintillators. Measured E|g. No 94ZR6c evidence was found for neutrinoless double-beta decay of {+94}Zr to 94ZR7c first excited state of {+94}Mo. Deduced lower partial half-life limit. 94ZR L 0 0+ 3.4E19 Y GT 94ZR cL T$for the 0|n+2|n decay mode of {+94}Zr double-beta decay to the 94ZR2cL first excited state of {+94}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.) using the 94ZR3cL Bayesian analysis method (2017Do04). The authors also report a 94ZR4cL lower-limit of 2.0|*10{+19} y for the sensitivity at 90% C.L. using the 94ZR5cL Feldman-Cousins method. 94ZR 94ZR(A,A'):GIANT RES:XUNDL-10 2015KR08 201512 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2015Kr08: Phys Rev C 92, 044323 94ZR2c (2015) 94ZR c Compiled by B. Singh (McMaster) Dec 4, 2015 94ZR c E(|a)=240 MeV from Texas A&M K500 superconducting cyclotron. Target= 94ZR2c self-supporting target foils 5-8 mg/cm{+2} of >96% enriched {+92}Zr. 94ZR3c Measured E|a, I|a, |a(|q) using multipole-dipole-multipole (MDM) 94ZR4c spectrometer. Deduced Isoscalar giant resonances (ISGMR, ISGDR, 94ZR5c ISGQR and ISGOR), and E0, E1, E2 and E3 strengths. Comparison with 94ZR6c Spherical Hartree-Fock-based random-phase approximation calculations. 94ZR7c DWBA analysis of |s(|q) data 94ZR c ISGMR=isoscalar giant monopole (E0) resonance 94ZR c ISGDR=isoscalar giant dipole (E1) resonance 94ZR c ISGQR=isoscalar giant quadrupole (E2) resonance 94ZR c ISGOR=isoscalar giant octupole (E3) resonance 94ZR cL $Total Isoscalar E0 EWSR=106% {I12}, E1 EWSR=96% {I10}, E2 EWSR=67% 94ZR2cL {I11}, and E3 EWSR=58% {I8} 94ZR CL T$LABEL=WIDTH 94ZR cL T$FWHM value, unless otherwise stated 94ZR cL E(A),T(A)$From authors' earlier work 2013Yo07 (Phys. Rev. C88, 021301) 94ZR L 14.49E3 15 2+ 5.7 MEV 3 94ZR cL $%E2 EWSR=67 {I11} for ISGQR 94ZR cL $The rms width=2.49 MeV {I30} 94ZR L 15.7E3 2 1- 9.0 MEV 10 94ZR cL E$low-energy ISGDR 94ZR cL $%E1 EWSR=28.0 {I40} for ISGDR 94ZR L 15.8E3 0+ 5.9 MEV A 94ZR cL $%E0 EWSR=83 for ISGMR 94ZR cL $The rms width=4.2 MeV {I+10-4} 94ZR L 24E3 AP 3- 4.84 MEV 30 94ZR cL E$covers a region between 12-35 MeV comprised mainly of high-energy 94ZR2cL octupole resonance (HEOR); contribution from low-energy octupole 94ZR3cL resonance (LEOR) in the range of about 10-15 MeV is low 94ZR cL T$rms width 94ZR cL $%E3 EWSR=58 {I8} for ISGOR 94ZR L 24.2E3 0+ 5.6 MEV A 94ZR cL $%E0 EWSR=21 for ISGMR 94ZR L 27.0E3 5 1- 9.9 MEV 20 94ZR cL E$high-energy ISGDR 94ZR cL $%E1 EWSR=64 {I7} for ISGDR 94ZR 92ZR(18O,16OG):XUNDL-11 2016YA09 201609 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2016Ya09: 94ZR c Phys. Rev. C 94, 015804 (2016) 94ZR c Compiled by G. G~urdal (Millsaps College), August 1, 2016 94ZR c Two-nucleon transfer reactions {+92}Zr({+18}O,{+16}O|g) and 94ZR2c {+90}Zr({+18}O,{+16}O|g) were employed to check the surrogate ratio 94ZR3c method (SRM) to determine the {+93}Zr(n,|g){+94}Zr reaction cross 94ZR4c section. The {+18}O beam was accelerated to 117 MeV by the Tandem 94ZR5c accelerator of Japan Atomic Energy Agency and impinged on an 94ZR6c isotopically enriched self-supporting metallic foil. The {+92}Zr had 94ZR7c a thickness of 315 |mg/cm{+2} and 94.6% isotopic enrichment. A 94ZR8c silicon |DE-E telescope was used to identify the light ejectile 94ZR9c particles. Two LaBr{-3}(Ce) detectors were used to detect |g-rays. 94ZRac The absolute efficiency of each LaBr{-3} detector was measured as 94ZRbc 0.45% at 1173.2 keV. Measured: E{-ejectile}, E|g, E{-x}({+94}Zr), and 94ZRcc |DE-E. Comparison of SRM cross sections with the direct (n,|g) 94ZRdc reaction cross sections. 94ZR cL E$From E|g. 94ZR cL J$From the Adopted Levels of {+94}Zr in ENSDF database. 94ZR cG E$From Figure 3a in 2016Ya09. The E|gs were detected in coincidence 94ZR2cG with {+16}O. 94ZR cG E(A)$Placement of the transition was not specified in 2016Ya09. The 94ZR2cG placement is from Adopted Levels of {+94}Zr in the ENSDF database by 94ZR3cG compiler. 94ZR c Compiler's note: The comparison of SRM and direct (n,|g) cross 94ZR2c sections are given in figure 5 as a function of neutron energy. 94ZR L 0 0+ 94ZR L 919 2+ 94ZR G 919 94ZR L 1470 4+ 94ZR G 551 94ZR L 1671 2+ ? 94ZR G 1671 ? 94ZRF G FLAG=A 94ZR L 2058 3- 94ZR G 1139 94ZR L 2330 4 ? 94ZR G 1411 ? 94ZRF G FLAG=A 94ZR L 2604 5- 94ZR G 1134 94ZRF G FLAG=A 94ZR 94ZR 2B-:T1/2:XUNDL-13 2018Do06 201811 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2018Do06: 94ZR2c J Phys G: Nucl Part Phys 45, 075104 (2018) 94ZR c Compiled by: Jun Chen (NSCL, MSU), June 29, 2018 94ZR c 2018Do06: the measurement was performed at the Felsenkeller 94ZR2c Underground Laboratory in Dresden, Germany, using natural Zr sample 94ZR3c with an ultra-low-background HPGe detector. Measured |g spectra. No 94ZR6c evidence was found for neutrinoless double-beta decay of {+94}Zr to 94ZR7c first excited state of {+94}Mo. Deduced lower partial half-life limit. 94ZR L 0 0+ 5.2E19 Y GT 94ZR cL T$for the 0|n+2|n decay mode of {+94}Zr double-beta decay to the 94ZR2cL first excited state of {+94}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.) using the 94ZR3cL Bayesian analysis method (2018Do06). 94ZR 94ZR(A,A'):GIANT RES:XUNDL-14 2021CR01 202209 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2021Cr01: Phys Lett B 816, 136210 94ZR2c (2021) 94ZR c Compiled by E.A. McCutchan (NNDC,BNL) August 24, 2022 94ZR c Includes data on proton scattering. 94ZR c E(|a)=130 MeV from AVP cyclotron at RCNP, Japan. Target= 94ZR2c self-supporting target foils 4 mg/cm{+2} thickness. 94ZR3c Measured E|a, |a-|g using the high resolution spectrometer, Grand 94ZR4c Raiden and the CAGRA array consisting of 12 Clover HPGe detectors. 94ZR L 0.0 0+ 94ZR L 919 2+ 94ZR G 919 E2 94ZR cG M$from |g(|q) (2021Cr01); data presented in Figure 1. 94ZR L 2846 1- 94ZR cL $%ISEWSR=1.0 {I15} for |a; %ISEWSR=1.05 {I15} for protons. Both values 94ZR2cL read by compiler from graph in Figure 3 of 2021Cr01 for Skl3 94ZR3cL interaction. 94ZR G 2846 E1 94ZR cG M$from |g(|q) (2021Cr01); data presented in Figure 1. 94ZR 94ZR 2B-:T:XUNDL-15 2023BE10 202309 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2023Be10: 94ZR2c Eur. Phys. J A 59, 176 (2023) 94ZR c Compiled by E.A. McCutchan (NNDC,BNL) September 18, 2023 94ZR c The measurement was performed at the DAMA/CRYA facility deep 94ZR2c underground at LNGS. Measurements were made with two CZC 94ZR3c scintillating crystals over 456.5 days. Deduced limits on the half 94ZR6c life of double-beta decay of {+94}Zr. 94ZR L 0 0+ 2.6E19 Y GT 94ZR cL T$for the 0|n2|b decay mode of {+94}Zr to the 94ZR2cL ground state of {+94}Mo at 90% confidence level (C.L.). 94ZR3cL Others: > 3.8|*10{+18} y for 0|n2|b decay mode to the 871 keV 94ZR4cL level of {+94}Mo, > 2.4 |*10{+18} y for 2|n2|b decay mode 94ZR5cL to the ground state of {+94}Mo, > 1.9 |*10{+17} y for 94ZR6cL 2|n2|b decay mode to the 871 keV level of {+94}Mo (2023Be10) 94ZR 94ZR 2B-:T1/2:XUNDL-16 2023CE01 202401 94ZR c Compiled (unevaluated) dataset from 2023Ce01: Eur Phys J C 83, 396 94ZR2c (2023). 94ZR c Compiled by G. G~urdal, Oct 6, 2023 94ZR c The measurement of half-life limit for the double-beta decay mode of 94ZR2c {+94}Zr to the first 2{++} excited state of {+94}Mo at 841.1 keV was 94ZR3c performed at Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso of INFN (Italy). 94ZR4c 736.35 g and 129.94 g Zr metal samples were used. The radiopurity of 94ZR5c the samples were measured via |g-spectroscopy with ultra-low 94ZR6c background HPGe detectors. Two data sets were collected using 736.35 94ZR7c g and 129.94 g Zr metal over 59.7 days and 37.3 days, respectively. 94ZR8c In the analysis, a simultaneous Binned Extended Likelihood fit on the 94ZR9c two datasets was performed taking into account all the background 94ZRac sources producing a peak in the energy range of 820 keV - 920 keV. 94ZRbc Deduced: Upper limit of decay rate |G{+|b|b} and lower limit of 94ZRcc T{-1/2} of double beta-decay of {+94}Zr to the first 2{++} state of 94ZRdc {+94}Mo. 94ZR L 0 0+ 2.1E20 Y GT 94ZR cL T$for the (0|n+2|b) decay mode of {+94}Zr to the 871.1 keV first 94ZR2cL excited state of {+94}Mo. Bayesian analysis was performed to deduce 94ZR3cL the upper limit of decay rate |G{+|b|b} < 3.36|*10{+-21} year{+-1} 94ZR4cL and lower limit of T{-1/2} at 90% C.L.